Skip to main content

Full text of "The literary remains of Samuel Taylor Coleridge"

See other formats


aiversity  of  Califl 
Southern  Regio] 
Library  Faciliti 


THE  LIBRARY 

OF 

THE  UNIVERSITY 

OF  CALIFORNIA 

LOS  ANGELES 


I'/ 


i^: 


\^^ 


f  ^lLhA^-*'^  ^^'^'^ 


v..i  ^.'•/.^  ''''"  '^       I,    .^  ,.,,/  ^,..  '^'"^'     I 

r    ,    L  i.^^^.  '^^'-    -^^^   'T        /  '    , 


;{     3-'ci<  Jtn^.^f^ 


THE    LITERARY    REMAINS 


OF    SAMUEL    TAYLOR    COLERIDGE 


COLLECTED  AND  EDITED  BY 


HENRY  NELSON  COLERIDGE,  ESQ.  M.A. 


VOLUME  THE  FIRST 


z- 


)  'jT' 


AI.  !)1 


LONDOiN 

WILLIAM    PICKERING 

1836 


\ 


CD 

co 


PR, 

CO'' 


tyj 


TO 

JOSEPH    HENRY   GREEN,    ESQ. 

MEMBER  OF  IIIF,  ROYAL  COLLEGE  OF  SUKGF.OXS, 

THE     APPROVED     FRIEND 

OF 

COLERIDGE 
THESE  VOLUMES 

ARE 

GRATEFULLY    INSCRIBED. 


VOL.  1. 


.-/ 


„-»   I  ^    ■      M 


.<!  /C  r» 


PREFACE. 


Mr.  Coleridge  by  his  will,  dated  in  Sep- 
tember, 1829,  authorized  his  executor,  if  he 
should  think  it  expedient,  to  publish  any  of 
the  notes  or  writing  made  by  him  (Mr.  C.) 
in  his  books,  or  any  other  of  his  manu- 
scripts or  writings,  or  any  letters  which 
should  thereafter  be  collected  from,  or  sup- 
plied by,  his  friends  or  correspondents. 
Agreeably  to  this  authority,  an  arrange- 
ment was  made,  under  the  superintendence 
of  Mr.  Green,  for  the  collection  of  Cole- 
ridge's literary  remains ;  and  at  the  same 
time  the  preparation  for  the  press  of  such 
part  of  the  materials  as  should  consist  of 
criticism  and  general  literature,  was  en- 
trusted to  the  care  of  the  present  Editor. 
The  volumes  now  offered  to  the  public  are 
the  first  results  of  that  arrangement.  They 
must  in  any  case  stand  in  need  of  much 
indulgence  from  the  ingenuous  reader ; — 


Vlll  PREFACE. 

mulfa  sunt  condonanda  in  opere  postumo  ; 
but  a  short  statement  of  the  difficulties 
attending  the  compihition  may  serve  to  ex- 
jihiin  some  apparent  anomahes,  and  to  pre- 
chule  some  unnecessaiy  censure. 

The  materials  were  fragmentary  in  the 
extreme — Sibylline  leaves  ; — notes  of  the 
lecturer,  memoranda  of  the  investigator, 
out-pourings  of  the  solitary  and  self-com- 
miming  student.  The  fear  of  the  press  was 
not  in  them.  Numerous  as  they  were,  too, 
they  came  to  light,  or  were  communicated, 
at  different  times,  before  and  after  the  print- 
ing was  commenced ;  and  the  dates,  the 
occasions,  and  the  references,  in  most  in- 
stances remained  to  be  discovered  or  con- 
jectured. To  give  to  such  materials  method 
and  continuity,  as  far  as  might  be, — to  set 
them  forth  in  the  least  disadvantageous 
manner  which  the  circumstances  would  per- 
mit,— was  a  delicate  and  perplexing  task ; 
and  the  Editor  is  painfully  sensible  that  he 
could  bring  few  qualifications  for  the  under- 
taking, but  such  as  were  involved  in  a  many 
years'  intercourse  with  the  author  himself, 
a  patient  study  of  his  writings,  a  reverential 
admiration  of  his  genius,  and  an  affectionate 
desire  to  help  in  extending  its  beneficial 
influence. 


PREFACE.  IX 

The  contents  of  these  volumes  are  drawn 
from  a  portion  only  of  the  manuscripts  en- 
trusted to  the  Editor :  the  remainder  of  the 
collection,  which,  under  favourable  circum- 
stances, he  hopes  may  hereafter  see  the 
light,  is  at  least  of  equal  value  with  what  is 
now  presented  to  the  reader  as  a  sample. 
In  perusing  the  following  pages,  the  reader 
will,  in  a  few  instances,  meet  with  disqui- 
sitions of  a  transcendental  character,  which, 
as  a  General  rule,  have  been  avoided  :  the 
truth  is,  that  they  were  sometimes  found  so 
indissolubly  intertwined  with  the  more  po- 
pular matter  which  preceded  and  followed, 
as  to  make  separation  impracticable.  There 
are  very  many  to  whom  no  apology  will  be 
necessary  in  this  respect ;  and  the  Editor 
only  adverts  to  it  for  the  purpose  of  ob- 
viating, as  far  as  may  be,  the  possible  com- 
plaint of  the  more  general  reader.  But 
there  is  another  point  to  which,  taught  by 
past  experience,  he  attaches  more  import- 
ance, and  as  to  which,  therefore,  he  ven- 
tures to  put  in  a  more  express  and  par- 
ticular caution.  In  many  of  the  books  and 
papers,  which  have  been  used  in  the  com- 
pilation of  these  volumes,  passages  from 
other  writers,  noted  down  by  Mr.  Coleridge 
as  in  some  way  remarkable,  were  mixed  up 


X  PREFACE. 

with  his  own  comments  on  such  passages, 
or  with  his  reflections  on  other  subjects,  in 
a  manner  very  eml)arrassing  to  the  eye  of 
a  tliircl  ])crson  undertaking  to  select  the 
original  matter,  after  the  lapse  of  several 
years.  The  Editor  need  not  say  that  he 
has  not  knowingly  admitted  any  thing  that 
was  not  genuine  without  an  express  decla- 
ration, as  in  Vol.  I.  p.  1  ;  and  in  another 
instance,  Vol.  II.  p.  379,  he  has  intimated 
his  own  suspicion :  but,  besides  these,  it  is 
possible  that  some  cases  of  mistake  in  this 
respect  may  have  occurred.  There  may 
be  one  or  two  passages — they  cannot  well 
be  more — printed  in  these  volumes,  which 
belong  to  other  writers ;  and  if  such  there 
be,  the  Editor  can  only  plead  in  excuse, 
that  the  work  has  been  prepared  by  him 
amidst  many  distractions,  and  hope  that,  in 
this  instance  at  least,  no  ungenerous  use 
will  be  made  of  such  a  circumstance  to  the 
disadvantage  of  the  author,  and  that  persons 
of  o^reater  reading:  or  more  retentive  memo- 
ries  than  the  Editor,  who  may  discover  any 
such  passages,  will  do  him  the  favour  to 
communicate  the  fact. 

The  Editor's  motive  in  publishing  the 
few  poems  and  fragments  included  in  these 
volumes,  was  to  make  a  supplement  to  the 


PREFACE.  XI 

collected  edition  of  Coleridge's  poetical 
works.  In  these  frag-ments  the  reader  will 
see  the  germs  of  several  passages  in  the 
already  published  poems  of  the  author,  but 
which  the  Editor  has  not  thought  it  neces- 
sary to  notice  more  particularly.  The  Fall 
of  Robespierre,  a  joint  composition,  has 
been  so  long  in  print  in  the  French  edition 
of  Coleridge's  poems,  that,  independently 
of  such  merit  as  it  may  possess,  it  seemed 
natural  to  adopt  it  upon  the  present  occasion, 
and  to  declare  the  true  state  of  the  author- 
ship. 

To  those  who  have  been  kind  enough 
to  communicate  books  and  manuscripts  for 
the  purpose  of  the  present  publication,  the 
Editor  and,  through  him,  Mr.  Coleridge's 
executor  return  their  grateful  thanks.  In 
most  cases  a  specific  acknowledgment  has 
been  made.  But,  above  and  independently 
of  all  others,  it  is  to  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Gillman, 
and  to  Mr.  Green  himself,  that  the  public 
are  indebted  for  the  preservation  and  use 
of  the  principal  part  of  the  contents  of  these 
volumes.  The  claims  of  those  respected 
individuals  on  the  gratitude  of  the  friends 
and  admirers  of  Coleridge  and  his  works 
are  already  well  known,  and  in  due  season 
those  claims  will  receive  additional  confir- 
mation. 


Xll  PREFACE. 

With  tlicse  remarks,  sincerely  conscious 
of  his  own  inadequate  execution  of  the  task 
assi«i;ned  to  liini,  yet  confident  withal  of  the 
general  worth  of  the  contents  of  the  follow- 
ing; pages — the  Editor  commits  the  reliques 
of  a  great  man  to  the  indulgent  consideration 
of  the  Pidjlic. 


Lincoln's  Inn, 
August  11,  1836. 


L' ENVOY 


He  was  one  who  with  long  and  large  arm 
still  collected  precious  armfulls  in  whatever 
direction  he  pressed  forward,  yet  still  took 
up  so  much  more  than  he  could  keep  to- 
gether, that  those  who  followed  him  gleaned 
more  from  his  continual  droppings  than  he 
himself  brought  home  ; — nay,  made  stately 
corn-ricks  therewith,  w^hile  the  reaper  him- 
self was  still  seen  only  with  a  strutting 
armful  of  newly-cut  sheaves.  But  I  should 
misinform  you  grossly  if  I  left  you  to  infer 
that  his  collections  were  a  heap  of  inco- 
herent miscellanea.  No !  the  very  con- 
trary. Their  variety,  conjoined  with  the 
too  great  coherency,  the  too  great  both 
desire  and  power  of  referring  them  in  sys- 
tematic, nay,  genetic  subordination,  w^as 
that  which  rendered  his  schemes  gigantic 
and  impracticable,  as  an  author,  and  his 
conversation    less    instructive    as    a    man. 


XIV  L  ENVOY. 

Auditoron  inopeni  ipsa  copia  fecit. — Too 
much  A\'as  g'iveii,  all  so  weighty  and  brilliant 
as  to  preclude  a  chance  of  its  being  all 
received, —  so  that  it  not  seldom  passed 
over  the  hearer's  mind  like  a  roar  of  many 
waters. 


I 


CONTENTS. 

Page 

The  Fall  of  Robespierre 1 

Poems. 

"  Julia  was  blest  with  beauty,  wit,  and  grace". ...  33 

" I  yet  remain" 34 

To  the  Rev.  W.  J.  Hort 35 

To  Charles  Lamb    36 

To  the  Nightingale 38 

To  Sara 39 

To  Joseph  Cottle     40 

Casimir 41 

Darwiniana 43 

"  The  early  year's  fast-flying  vapours  stray" 44 

Count  Rumford's  Essays    45 

Epigrams. 

On  a  late  Marriage  between  an  Old  Maid  and  a 

French  Petit  Maitre    45 

On  an  Amorous  Doctor 46 

"  There  comes  from  old  Avaro's  grave" 46 

"  Last  Monday  all  the  papers  said" 46 

To  a  Primrose,  (the  first  seen  in  the  season) 47 

On  the  Christening  of  a  Friend's  Child 48 

Epigram,  "  Hoarse  Msevius  reads  his  hobbling  verse"  49 
Inscription  by  the  Rev.  W.  L.  Bowles,  in  Nether 

Stowey  Church    50 

Translation 50 

Introduction  to  the  Tale  of  the  Dark  Ladie 50 

Epilogue  to  the  Rash  Conjuror 52 

Psyche     53 

Complaint    53 

Reproof 53 

An  Ode  to  the  Rain    54 

Translation  of  a  Passage  in  Ottfried's  Metrical  Pa- 
raphrase of  the  Gospels 56 


XVI  CONTENTS. 

Pfig-e 
Poonis. 

Israel's  Lament  on  ihe  Death  of  the  Princess  Char- 
lotte of  Wales -i^ 

Sentimental 59 

The  Alternative   59 

The  Exchange 59 

What  is  Life  ? 60 

Inscription  for  a  Time-piece   60 

'E.inTa(piov  avroypwrToy    60 

A  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Prospectus 61 

Lecture  I.    General  character  of  the  Gothic  Mind  in  tlie 

Middle  Ages 67 

II.    General  Character  of  the  Gothic  Literature 

and  Art    70 

III.    The  Troubadours  —  Boccaccio  —  Petrarch — 

Pulci — Chaucer — Spenser     79 

VII.     Ben  Jonson,   Beaumont  and   Fletcher,  and 

Massinger 97 

V'lII.    Don  Quixote.    Cervantes    113 

IX.  On  the  Distinctions  of  the  Witty,  the  Droll, 
the  Odd,  and  the  Humorous;  the  Nature 
and   Constituents  of  Humour;     Rabelais, 

Swift,  Sterne 131 

X.     Donne,  Dante,  Milton,  Paradise  Lost 148 

XL  Asiatic  and  Greek  Mythologies,  Robinson 
Crusoe,  Use  of  Works  of  Imagination  in 

Education 184 

XII.     Dreams,   Apparitions,    Alchemists,    Person- 
ality of  the  Evil  Being,  Bodily  Identity...    201 

XIII.  On  Poesy  or  Art 216 

XIV.  On  Style 230 

Notes  on  Sir  Thomas  Browne's  Religio  Medici 241 

Notes  on  .Junius 248 

Notes  on  Barclay's  Argenis 255 

Note  in  Casaubon's  Persius 258 


CONTENTS.  XVll 

Page 

Notes  on  Chapman's  Homer 259 

Note  in  Baxter's  Life  of  Himself 263 

Fragment  of  an  Essay  on  Taste 266 

Fragment  of  an  Essay  on  Beauty 270 

Poems  and  Poetical  Fragments 274 

OMNIANA. 

The  French  Decade    282 

Ride  and  Tie   , 284 

Jeremy  Taylor 285 

Criticism 285 

Public  Instruction 286 

Picturesque  Words 287 

Toleration 288 

War 288 

Parodies 289 

M.  Dupuis 289 

Origin  of  the  Worship  of  Hymen 290 

Egotism 291 

Cap  of  Liberty 293 

Bulls , 294 

Wise  Ignorance 295 

Rouge 296 

Hasty  Words 296 

Motives  and  Impulses 297 

Inward  Blindness 299 

The  Vices  of  Slaves  no  excuse  for  Slavery 300 

Circulation  of  the  Blood 301 

PeriturcB  Parcere  ChartcB 302 

To  have  and  to  be 303 

Party  Passion 304 

(jroodness  of  Heart  Indispensable  to  a  Man  of  Genius  .  .    304 

Milton  and  Ben  Jonson 305 

Statistics 305 

Magnanimity   306 

Negroes  and  Narcissuses 309 

An  Anecdote   309 

The  Pharos  at  Alexandria 310 


will  CONTESTS. 

Pnga 

Sense  and  Common  Sense 310 

Toleration 312 

Mint  for  a  New  Species  of  History 315 

Text  Sparring 320 

Pelagianism 321 

The  Soul  and  its  Organs  of  Sense 323 

Sir  George  Etherege,  &c 330 

Evidence 335 

Force  of  Habit    336 

Phoenix    336 

Memory  and  Recollection 336 

Aliquid  ex  Nihilo 337 

Brevity  of  the  Greek  and  English  compared 337 

The  Will  and  the  Deed 338 

The  Will  for  the  Deed    338 

Sincerity 339 

Truth  and  Falsehood 339 

Religious  Ceremonies 340 

Association 340 

Curiosity 341 

New  Truths 342 

Vicious  Pleasures    342 

Meriting  Heaven   342 

Dust  to  Dust 343 

Human  Countenance 343 

Lie  useful  to  Truth 343 

Science  in  Roman  Catholic  States 343 

Voluntary  Belief 344 

Amanda 344 

Hymen's  Torch 345 

Youth  and  Age 345 

December  Morning 345 

Archbishop  Leighton 346 

Christian  Honesty 346 

Inscription  on  a  Clock  in  Cheapside 347 

Rationalism  is  not  Reason 347 

Inconsistency 349 

Hope  in  Humanity 349 


CONTENTS.  XIX 

Page 

Self-love  in  Religion   351 

Limitation  of  Love  of  Poetry 356 

Humility  of  the  Amiable 357 

Temper  in  Argument 357 

Patriarchal  Government 358 

Callous  self-conceit 359 

A  Librarian 359 

Trimming  360 

Death 360 

Love  an  Act  of  the  Will 360 

Wedded  Union    361 

Difference  between  Hobbes  and  Spinosa 362 

The  End  may  justify  the  Means. . , 363 

Negative  Thought 363 

Man's  return  to  Heaven 364 

Young  Prodigies 364 

Welch  names 365 

German  Language 366 

The  Universe 367 

Harberous    368 

An  Admonition   368 

To  Thee  Cherubim  and  Seraphim  continually  do  cry. . .  .   370 

Definition  of  Miracle 370 

Death,  and  grounds  of  belief  in  a  Future  State 372 

Hatred  of  Injustice , 374 

Religion 374 

The  Apostles'  Creed 379 

A  Good  Heart 380 

Evidences  of  Christianity 386 

Confessio  Fidei 389 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE 

AND  OTHER  POEMS. 


VOL.   I. 


TO    n.    MARTIN,    ESQ. 

OF  JESUS  COLLKGE,  CAM  Hill  OCiE. 
DRAi;   Sll?, 

Accept,  as  a  small  testimony  of  my  grateful  attacli- 
ment,  the  following  Dramatic  Poem,  in  wliicli  I  have 
endeavoured  to  detail,  in  an  interesting  form,  the  fall  of 
a  man,  whose  great  bad  actions  have  cast  a  disastrous 
lustre  on  his  name.  In  the  execution  of  the  work,  as 
intricacy  of  plot  could  not  have  been  attempted  without 
a  gross  violation  of  recent  facts,  it  has  been  my  sole  aim 
to  imitate  the  impassioned  and  highly  figurative  lan- 
guage of  the  French  Orators,  and  to  develope  the  cha- 
racters of  the  chief  actors  on  a  vast  sta^e  of  horrors. 

Yours  fraternally, 

8.  T.  Coleridge. 

Jesus  College, 
September  22,  1794. 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE. 

AN  HISTORIC  DRAMA.     1794.* 

ACT  I. 

Scene — The  Tui/Ieries: 

BARRERE. 

The  tempest  gathers — be  it  mine  to  seek 

A  friendly  shelter,  ere  it  bursts  upon  him. 

But  where  ?  and  how  ?   I  fear  the  tyrant's  soul — 

Sudden  in  action,  fertile  in  resource, 

And  rising  awful  'mid  impending  ruins; 

In  splendour  gloomy,  as  the  midnight  meteor, 

That  fearless  thwarts  the  elemental  war. 

*  The  origin  and  authorship  of  "The  Fall  of  Robespierre"  will  be 
best  explained  by  the  following  extract  from  a  letter  from  Mr.  Southey 
to  tlie  Editor: 

"  This  is  the  history  of  The  Fall  of  Robespierre.  It  originated  in 
sportive  conversation  at  poor  Lovell's,  and  we  agreed  each  to  produce  an 
act  by  the  next  evening; — S.  T.  C.  the  first,  I  the  second,  and  Lovell 
the  third.  S.  T.  C.  brought  part  of  his,  I  and  Lovell  the  whole  of  ours ; 
but  L.'s  was  not  in  keeping,  and  therefore  I  undertook  to  supply  the 
third  also  by  the  following  day.  By  that  time,  S,  T.  C.  had  filled  up 
his.  A  dedication  to  Mrs.  Hannah  More  was  concocted,  and  the  notable 
performance  was  offered  for  sale  to  a  bookseller  in  Bristol,  who  was  too 
wise  to  buy  it.  Your  Uncle  took  the  MSS.  with  him  to  Cambridge, 
and  there  rewrote  the  first  act  at  leisure,  and  published  it.  My  portion 
I  never  saw  from  the  time  it  was  written  till  the  whole  was  before  the 
world.  It  was  written  with  newspapers  before  me,  as  fast  as  newspaper 
could  be  put  into  blank  verse.  I  have  no  desire  to  claim  it  now,  or 
hereafter;  but  neither  am  I  ashamed  of  it;  and  if  you  think  proper  to 
print  the  whole,  so  be  it." — 

"  Tlie  Fall  of  Robespierre,  a  tragedy,  of  whicli  the  first  act  was  written 
by  S.  T.  Coleridge."  Mr.  C.'s  note  in  the  Conciuiies  ad  Fopulimi, 
1795.     Ed. 


4  THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE. 

When  last  in  secret  conference  we  met, 

He  scovvl'd  upon  me  with  suspicious  rage, 

Making  his  eye  the  inmate  of  my  bosom. 

I  know  he  scorns  me — and  I  feel,  I  hate  him — 

Yet  there  is  in  him  that  which  makes  me  tremble ! 

[Exit. 

Enter  'r.MAAEts  and  Lkgendue. 

TALLIRN. 

It  was  Barrere,  Legendre !  didst  thou  mark  him  ? 

Abrupt  he  turn'd,  yet  linger'd  as  he  went, 

And  tow'rds  us  cast  a  look  of  doubtful  meaning. 

LEGENDRE. 

I  mark'd  him  well.     I  met  his  eye's  last  glance; 

It  menac'd  not  so  proudly  as  of  yore. 

Methought  he  would  have  spoke — but  that  he  dar'd  not — 

Such  agitation  darken'd  on  his  brow. 

TALLIKN. 

'Twas  all-distrusting  guilt  that  kept  from  bursting 
Th'  imprison'd  secret  struggling  in  the  face  : 
E'en  as  the  sudden  breeze  upstarting  onwards 
Hurries  the  thunder  cloud,  that  pois'd  awhile 
Hung  in  mid  air,  red  with  its  mutinous  burthen. 

LEGENDRE. 

Perfidious  traitor ! — still  afraid  to  bask 
In  the  full  blaze  of  power,  the  rustling  serpent 
Lurks  in  the  thicket  of  the  tyrant's  greatness, 
Ever  prepar'd  to  sting  who  shelters  him. 
Each  thought,  each  action  in  himself  converges ; 
And  love  and  friendship  on  his  coward  heart 
Shine  like  the  powerless  sun  on  polar  ice : 
To  all  attach'd,  by  turns  deserting  all, 
Cunning  and  dark — a  necessary  villain  ! 

TALLIEN. 

Yet  much  depends  upon  him — well  you  know 
With  plausible  harangue  'tis  his  to  paint 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  5 

Defeat  like  victory — and  blind  the  mob 
With  truth-mix'd  falsehood.     They,  led  on  by  him, 
And  wild  of  head  to  work  their  own  destruction, 
Support  with  uproar  what  he  plans  in  darkness. 

LEGENDRE. 

O  what  a  precious  name  is  liberty 

To  scare  or  cheat  the  simple  into  slaves ! 

Yes — we  must  gain  him  over :  by  dark  hints 

We'll  show  enough  to  rouse  his  watchful  fears, 

Till  the  cold  coward  blaze  a  patriot. 

O  Danton  !  murder'd  friend  !  assist  my  counsels — 

Hover  around  me  on  sad  memory's  wings. 

And  pour  thy  daring  vengeance  in  my  heart. 

Tallien  !  if  but  to-morrow's  fateful  sun 

Beholds  the  tyrant  living — we  are  dead  ! 

TALLIEN. 

Yet  his  keen  eye  that  flashes  mighty  meanings — 

LEGENDRE. 

Fear  not — or  rather  fear  th'  alternative. 

And  seek  for  courage  e'en  in  cowardice — 

But  see — hither  he  comes — let  us  away  ! 

His  brother  with  him,  and  the  bloody  Couthon, 

And,  high  of  haughty  spirit,  young  St.  Just.      [Exeunt. 

Enter  Robespierre,  Couthon,  St.  Just,  a/id 
Robespierre  Junior. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

What !  did  La  Fayette  fall  before  my  power — 
And  did  I  conquer  Roland's  spotless  virtues — 
The  fervent  eloquence  of  Vergniaud's  tongue. 
And  Brissot's  thoughtful  soul  unbribed  and  bold  ! 
Did  zealot  armies  haste  in  vain  to  save  them  ! 
What!  did  th'  assassin's  dagger  aim  its  point 
Vain,  as  a  dream  of  murder,  at  my  bosom; 
And  shall  I  dread  the  soft  luxurious  Tallien? 
Th'  Adonis  Tallien, — banquet-hunting  Tallien,- — 


0  THE  FALL  OF  ROIJESI'IERRE. 

Him,  whose  heart  flutters  at  the  dice-box  !   Ilini, 
Who  ever  on  the  harlots'  downy  pillow 
Resigns  his  head  impure  to  feverish  slumbers ! 

ST.  JLsr. 

1  cannot  fear  him — yet  we  must  not  scorn  him. 
Was  it  not  Antony  that  conquer'd  Brutus, 

Th*  Adonis,  banquet-hunting  Antony? 
The  state  is  not  yet  purified :  and  though 
The  stream  runs  clear,  yet  at  the  bottom  lies 
The  thick  black  sediment  of  all  the  factions — 
It  needs  no  magic  hand  to  stir  it  up  ! 

COL'TIION. 

O,  we  did  wrong  to  spare  them — fatal  error  ! 
Why  lived  Legendre,  when  that  Danton  died, 
And  Collot  d'Herbois  danoerous  in  crimes? 
I've  fear'd  him,  since  his  iron  heart  endured 
To  make  of  Lyons  one  vast  human  shambles, 
Compar'd  with  which  the  sun-scorch'd  wilderness 
Of  Zara  were  a  smiling  paradise. 

ST.  JUST. 

Rightly  thou  judgest,  Couthon  !  He  is  one. 
Who  flies  from  silent  solitary  anguish. 
Seeking  forgetful  peace  amid  the  jar 
Of  elements.     The  howl  of  maniac  uproar 
Lulls  to  sad  sleep  the  memory  of  himself. 
A  calm  is  fatal  to  him — then  he  feels 
The  dire  upboilings  of  the  storm  within  him. 
A  tiger  mad  with  inward  wounds  ! — I  dread 
The  fierce  and  restless  turbulence  of  guilt. 

IIOBESPIERRE. 

Is  not  the  Commune  ours  ?  the  stern  Tribunal  ? 
Dumas?  andVivier?  Fleuriot?  andLouvet? 
And  Henriot  ?  We'll  denounce  a  hundred,  nor 
Shall  they  behold  to-morrow's  sun  roll  westward. 

IJOBESl'lERRE  JUNIOR. 

iNav — I  am  sick  of  blood  !  my  achimi:  heart 


THE   FALL  OF   ROBESPIERllE. 

Reviews  the  long,  long  train  of  hideous  horrors 
That  still  have  glooni'd  the  rise  of  the  Republic. 
I  should  have  died  before  Toulon,  when  war 
Became  the  patriot ! 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Most  unworthy  wish  ! 
He,  whose  heart  sickens  at  the  blood  of  traitors 
Would  be  himself  a  traitor,  were  he  not 
A  coward  !  'Tis  congenial  souls  alone 
Shed  tears  of  sorrow  for  each  other's  fate. 
O,  thou  art  brave,  my  brother !  and  thine  eye 
Full  firmly  shines  amid  the  groaning  battle — 
Yet  in  thine  heart  the  woman-form  of  pity 
Asserts  too  large  a  share,  an  ill-timed  guest ! 
There  is  unsoundness  in  the  state — to-morrow 
Shall  see  it  cleansed  by  wholesome  massacre  ! 

ROBESPIERRE  JUNIOR. 

Beware  !  already  do  the  Sections  murmur — 
"  O  the  great  glorious  patriot,  Robespierre — 
The  tyrant  guardian  of  the  country's  freedom  !" 

COUTHON. 

'Tvvere  folly  sure  to  work  great  deeds  by  halves  ! 
Much  I  suspect  the  darksome  fickle  heart 
Of  cold  Barrere ! 

ROBESPIERRE. 

I  see  the  villain  in  him  ! 

ROBESPIERRE  JUNIOR. 

If  he — if  all  forsake  thee — what  remains? 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Myself!  the  steel-strong  rectitude  of  soul 

And  poverty  sublime  'mid  circling  virtues 

The  giant  victories,  my  counsels  form'd. 

Shall  stalk  around  me  with  sun-glittering  plumes. 

Bidding  the  darts  of  calumny  fall  pointless. 

[Exeuttt.    Manet  Coiithoit. 


I 


8         THE  FALL  OF  KOBESPIKRUE. 

COUTHOM. 

So  we  deceive  ourselves  !  What  goodly  virtues 

Bloom  on  the  poisonous  branches  of  ambition  ! 

Still,  Robespierre  !  thou'l't  guard  thy  country's  freedom 

To  despotize  in  all  the  patriot's  pomp. 

While  conscience,  'mid  the  mob's  applauding  clamours, 

Sleeps  in  thine  ear,  nor  whispers — blood-stain'd  tyrant ! 

Yet  what  is  conscience  ?  superstition's  dream 

Making  such  deep  impression  on  our  sleep — 

Tiiat  long  th'  awaken'd  breast  retains  its  horrors  ! 

But  he  returns — and  with  him  comes  Barrerc. 

[Exit  Couthon. 

Enter  Robespierre  and  Barrere. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

There  is  no  danger  but  in  cowardice. — 
Barrere  !  we  make  the  danger,  when  we  fear  it. 
We  have  such  force  without,  as  will  suspend 
The  cold  and  trembling  treachery  of  these  members. 

BARRERE. 

'Twill  be  a  j^ause  of  terror. — 

ROBESPIERRE. 

But  to  whom  ? 
Rather  the  short-lived  slumber  of  the  tempest, 
Gathering  its  strength  anew.     The  dastard  traitors  ! 
Moles,  that  would  undermine  the  rooted  oak  ! 
A  pause  ! — a  moment's  pause ! — 'Tis  all  their  life. 

BARRERE. 

Yet  much  they  talk — and  plausible  their  speech. 
Couthon's  decree  has  given  such  powers,  that — ■ 

ROBESPIERRE. 

That  what  ? 

BARRERE. 

The  freedom  of  debate — 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Transparent  mask ! 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  9 

They  wish  to  clog  the  wheels  of  government, 
Forcing  the  hand  that  guides  the  vast  machine 
To  bribe  them  to  their  duty. — English  patriots  ! 
Are  not  the  congregated  clouds  of  war 
Black  all  around  us  ?  In  our  very  vitals 
Works  not  the  king-bred  poison  of  rebellion  ? 
Say,  what  shall  counteract  the  selfish  plottings 
Of  wretches,  cold  of  heart,  nor  awed  by  fears 
Of  him,  whose  power  directs  th'  eternal  justice  ? 
Terror  ?  or  secret-sapping  gold  ?  The  first 
Heavy,  but  transient  as  the  ills  that  cause  it ; 
And  to  the  virtuous  patriot  render'd  light 
By  the  necessities  that  gave  it  birth : 
The  other  fouls  the  fount  of  the  Republic, 
Making  it  flow  polluted  to  all  ages; 
Inoculates  the  state  with  a  slow  venom, 
That  once  imbibed,  must  be  continued  ever. 
Myself  incorruptible  I  ne'er  could  bribe  them — 
Therefore  they  hate  me. 

BARRERE. 

Are  the  Sections  friendly  ? 

ROBESPIERRE. 

There  are  who  wish  my  ruin — but  I'll  make  them 
Blush  for  the  crime  in  blood  ! 

BARRERE. 

Nay — but  I  tell  thee, 
Thou  art  too  fond  of  slaughter — and  the  right 
(If  right  it  be)  workest  by  most  foul  means  ! 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Self-centering  Fear !  how  well  thou  canst  ape  Mercy ! 

Too  fond  of  slaughter  ! — matchless  hypocrite  ! 

Thought  Barrere  so,  when  Brissot,  Danton  died  ? 

Thought  Barrere  so,  when  through  the  streaming  streets 

Of  Paris  red-eyed  Massacre,  o'er  wearied, 

Reel'd  heavily,  intoxicate  with  blood? 

And  when  (O  heavens  !)  in  Lyons'  death-red  square 


10  THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE. 

Sick  fancy  groan'cl  o'er  putrid  liills  of  slain, 
Didst  thou  not  fiercely  laugh,  and  bless  the  day  i 
Why,  thou  hast  been  the  mouth-piece  of  ail  horrors, 
And,  like  a  blood-hound,  crouch'd  for  murder  !   Now 
Aloof  thou  standest  from  the  tottering  pillar. 
Or,  like  a  frighted  child  behind  its  mother, 
Hidest  thy  pale  face  in  the  skirts  of — Mercy  ! 

BAllRERE. 

0  prodigahty  of  eloquent  anger  ! 

Why  now  I  see  thou'rt  weak — thy  case  is  desperate  ! 
The  cool  ferocious  Robespierre  turn'd  scolder ! 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Who  from  a  bad  man's  bosom  wards  the  blow. 

Reserves  the  whetted  dawger  for  his  own. 

Denounced  twice — and  twice  I  sav'd  his  life  !         [Exit. 

BARRERE, 

The  Sections  will  support  them — there's  the  point ! 
No !  he  can  never  weather  out  the  storm — 
Yet  he  is  sudden  in  reven^-e — No  more  ! 

1  must  away  to  Tallien.  [  Exit. 

Scene  changes  to  the  House  oj'  Adelaide. 
Adelaide  enters,  speaking  to  a  Servant. 

ADELAIDE. 

Didst  thou  present  the  letter  that  I  gave  thee? 
Did  Tallien  answer,  he  would  soon  return  ? 

SERVANT. 

He  is  in  the  Tuilleries — with  him,  Legendre — 

In  deep  discourse  they  seem'd  :  as  I  approach'd 

He  waved  his  hand,  as  biddiniz;  me  retire : 

I  did  not  interrupt  him.  [Returns  the  letter. 

ADELAIDE. 

Thou  didst  rightly. 

[Exit  Servant. 
O  this  new  freedom  !  at  how  dear  a  price 
We've  bought  the  seeming  good !  The  peaceful  virtues 


THE  FALL  OF  11015ESPIERRE.  1  I 

And  every  blandishment  of  private  life, 

The  father's  cares,  the  mother's  fond  endearment. 

All  sacrificed  to  liberty's  wild  riot. 

The  winged  hours,  that  scatter'd  roses  round  me, 

Lanouid  and  sad  drag  their  slow  course  along, 

And  shake  big  gall-drops  from  their  heavy  wings. 

But  I  will  steal  away  these  anxious  thoughts 

By  the  soft  languishment  of  warbled  airs. 

If  haply  melodies  may  lull  the  sense 

Of  sorrow  for  a  while.  [Soft  Music. 

Elite)-  Tallien. 

TALLIEN, 

Music,  my  love  ?  O  breathe  again  that  air  ! 

Soft  nurse  of  pain,  it  soothes  the  weary  soul 

Of  care,  sweet  as  the  whisper'd  breeze  of  evening 

That  plays  around  the  sick  man's  throbbing  temples. 

SONG. 

Tell  me,  on  what  holy  ground 
May  domestic  peace  be  found  ? 
Halcyon  daughter  of  the  skies, 
Far  on  fearful  wing  she  flies. 
From  the  pomp  of  sceptred  state. 
From  the  rebel's  noisy  hate. 

In  a  cottag'd  vale  she  dwells, 
List'nino-  to  the  Sabbath  bells  ! 
Still  around  her  steps  are  seen 
Spotless  honour's  meeker  mien. 
Love,  the  sire  of  pleasing  fears. 
Sorrow  smilino-  through  her  tears. 
And  conscious  of  the  past  employ, 
Memory,  bosom-spring  of  joy. 

TALI.IEN. 

I  thank  thee,  Adelaide !  'twas  sweet,  though  mournful. 


12  THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE. 

13ut  wliy  thy  brow  o'ercast,  thy  cheek  so  wan  ? 
Thou  look'st  as  a  lorn  maid  beside  some  stream, 
That  sighs  away  the  soul  in  fond  despairing, 
While  sorrow  sad,  like  the  dank  willow  near  her, 
Hangs  o'er  the  troubled  fountain  ofher  eye. 

ADELAIDE. 

Ah  !  rather  let  me  ask  what  mystery  lowers 

On  Tallien's  darken'd  brow.     Thou  dost  me  wrong- 

Thy  soul  distemper'd,  can  my  heart  be  tranquil  ? 

TALLIEN. 

Tell  me,  by  whom  thy  brother's  blood  was  spilt  ? 
Asks  he  not  vengeance  on  these  patriot  murderers  ? 
It  has  been  borne  too  tamely.     Fears  and  curses 
Groan  on  our  midnight  beds,  and  e'en  our  dreams 
Threaten  the  assassin  hand  of  Robespierre. 
He  dies  ! — nor  has  the  plot  escaped  his  fears. 

ADELAIDE. 

Yet — yet — be  cautious  !  much  I  fear  the  Communc- 
The  tyrant's  creatures,  and  their  fate  with  his 
Fast  link'd  in  close  indissoluble  union. 
The  pale  Convention — 

TALLIEN. 

Hate  him  as  they  fear  him, 
Impatient  of  the  chain,  resolved  and  ready. 

ADELAIDE. 

Th'  enthusiast  mob,  confusion's  lawless  sons — 

TALLIEN. 

They  are  aweary  of  his  stern  morality, 
The  fair-mask'd  offspring  of  ferocious  pride. 
The  Sections  too  support  the  delegates : 
All — all  is  ours !  e'en  now  the  vital  air 
Of  Liberty,  condens'd  awhile,  is  bursting 
(Force  irresistible  !)  from  its  compressurc — 
To  shatter  the  arch  chemist  in  the  explosion ! 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  13 

Enter  Billaud  Varennes  and  Bourdon  l'Oise. 

\^ Adelaide  retires. 

BOURDON   l'oISE. 

Tallien  !  was  this  a  time  for  amorous  conference  ? 
Hen  riot,  the  tyrant's  most  devoted  creature, 
Marshals  the  force  of  Paris  :  The  fierce  club. 
With  Vivier  at  their  head,  in  loud  acclaim 
Have  sworn  to  make  the  guillotine  in  blood 
Float  on  the  scaffold. — But  who  comes  here  ? 

Enter  Barrere  abruptly. 

barrere. 
Say,  are  ye  friends  to  freedom  ?   I  am  hers  ! 
Let  us,  forgetful  of  all  common  feuds, 
Rally  around  her  shrine  !  E'en  now  the  tyrant 
Concerts  a  plan  of  instant  massacre  ! 

billaud  varennes. 
Away  to  the  Convention  !  with  that  voice 
So  oft  the  herald  of  glad  victory. 
Rouse  their  fallen  spirits,  thunder  in  their  ears 
The  names  of  tyrant,  plunderer,  assassin  ! 
The  violent  workings  of  my  soul  within 
Anticipate  the  monster's  blood  ! 

[Cry  from  the  street  of- — No  tyrant ! 
Down  with  the  tyrant  I 

TALLIEN. 

Hear  ye  that  outcry  ? — If  the  trembling  members 

Even  for  a  moment  hold  his  fate  suspended, 

I  swear  by  the  holy  poniard,  that  stabbed  Csesar, 

This  dagger  probes  his  heart !  [Exeu7it  omnes. 


14  THIi  FALL  OF   UOBESPIFRRi:. 

ACT    II. 

Scene — The  Convention. 

RoBiiSPiEiiRE  mounts  the  Tribune. 
Once  more  befits  it  that  the  voice  of"  trutli, 
Fearless  in  innocence,  thougli  Icaguer'd  round 
By  envy  and  her  hateful  brood  of  hell, 
Be  heard  amid  this  hall ;  once  more  befits 
The  patriot,  whose  prophetic  eye  so  oft 
Has  pierc'd  thro'  faction's  veil,  to  flash  on  crimes 
Of  deadliest  import.     Mouldering  in  the  grave 
Sleeps  Capet's  caitiff  corse ;  my  daring  hand 
Levell'd  to  earth  his  blood-cemented  throne,  ' 
My  voice  declared  his  guilt,  and  stirr'd  up  France 
To  call  for  vengeance.     1  too  dug  the  grave 
Where  sleep  the  Girondists,  detested  band ! 
Long  with  the  show  of  freedom  they  abused 
Her  ardent  sons.     Long  time  the  well-turn'd  phrase, 
The  high  fraught  sentence,  and  the  lofty  tone 
Of  declamation  thunder'd  in  this  hall, 
Till  reason,  midst  a  labyrinth  of  words, 
Perplex'd,  in  silence  seem'd  to  yield  assent. 
I  durst  oppose.     Soul  of  my  honour'd  friend. 
Spirit  of  Marat,  upon  thee  I  call — 
Thou  know'st  me  faithful,  know'st  with  what  warm  zeal 
I  urged  the  cause  of  justice,  stripp'd  the  mask 
From  faction's  deadly  visage,  and  destroy'd 
Her  traitor  brood.     Whose  patriot  arm  hurl'd  down 
Hebert  and  Rousin,  and  the  villain  friends 
Of  Danton,  foul  apostate  !  those,  who  long 
Mask'd  treason's  form  in  liberty's  fair  garb, 
Long  deluged  France  with  blood,  and  durst  defy 
Omni])otence  !   but  I,  it  seems,  am  false  ! 
I  am  a  traitor  too  !  I — Robespierre  ! 


THE  FALL  OF  RORESPIFRRE,  15 

I — at  whose  name  tlie  dastard  despot  brood 

Look  pale  with  fear,  and  call  on  saints  to  help  them 

Who  dares  accuse  me?  who  shall  dare  belie 

My  spotless  name  ?   Speak,  ye  accomplice  band, 

Of  what  am  I  accused  ?  of  what  strange  crime 

Is  Maximilian  Robespierre  accused. 

That  through  this  hall  the  buzz  of  discontent 

Should  murmur  ?   who  shall  speak  ? 

BILLAUD  VARENNES. 

O  patriot  tongue, 
Belying  the  foul  heart!  Who  was  it  urged 
Friendly  to  tyrants  that  accurst  decree, 
Whose  influence  brooding  o'er  this  hallow'd  hall, 
Has  chill'd  each  tongue  to  silence.     Who  destroy 'd 
The  freedom  of  debate,  and  carried  through 
The  fatal  law,  that  doom'd  the  delegates, 
Unlieard  before  their  equals,  to  the  bar 
Where  cruelty  sat  throned,  and  murder  reign'd 
With  her  Dumas  coequal?  Say — thou  man 
Of  mighty  eloquence,  whose  law  was  that  ? 

COUTH ON. 

That  law  was  mine.     I  urged  it — I  proposed — 
The  voice  of  France  assembled  in  her  sons 
Assented,  though  the  tame  and  timid  voice 
Of  traitors  murmur'd.     I  advised  that  law — 
I  justify  it.     It  was  wise  and  good. 

BARRERE. 

Oh,  wondrous  wise,  and  most  convenient  too  ! 
I  have  long  mark'd  thee,  Robespierre — and  now 
Proclaim  thee  traitor — tyrant  I  [Loud  apphnises. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

[t  is  well ; — 
I  am  a  traitor  !  oh,  that  I  had  fallen 
Wheu  Regnault  lifted  high  the  murderous  knife; 
Regnault,  the  instrument  belike  of  those 
Who  now  themselves  would  fain  assassinate, 


IC  THE  FALL  OF   ROBESPIERRE. 

And  legalize  their  murders.     I  stand  here 
An  isohitcd  patriot — henim'd  around 
By  faction's  noisy  pack ;  beset  and  bay'd 
By  the  foul  hell-hounds  who  know  no  escape 
From  justice'  outstretch'd  arm,  but  by  the  force 
That  pierces  through  her  breast. 

[Murmurs,  and  shouts  of — Down  ivith  the  tyrant ! 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Nay,  but  I  will  be  heard.     There  was  a  time 
When  Robespierre  began,  the  loud  applauses 
Of  honest  patriots  drown'd  the  honest  sound. 
But  times  are  changed,  and  villany  prevails. 

COLLOT  d'hERBOIS. 

No — villany  shall  fall.  France  could  not  brook 
A  monarch's  sway ; — sounds  the  dictator's  name 
More  soothing  to  her  ear  ? 

BOURDON    l'oISE. 

Rattle  her  chains 
More  musically  now  than  when  the  hand 
Of  Brissot  forged  her  fetters ;  or  the  crew 
Of  Hebert  thunder'd  out  their  blasphemies, 
And  Danton  talk'd  of  virtue  ? 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Oh,  that  Brissot 
Were  here  again  to  thunder  in  this  hall, — 
That  Hebert  lived,  and  Danton's  giant  form 
Scowl'd  once  again  defiance  !  so  my  soul 
Might  cope  with  worthy  foes. 

People  of  France, 
Hear  me  !  Beneath  the  vengeance  of  the  law 
Traitors  have  perish 'd  countless ;  more  survive : 
The  hydra-headed  faction  lifts  anew 
Her  daring  front,  and  fruitful  from  her  wounds, 
Cautious  from  past  defects,  contrives  new  wiles 
Against  the  sons  of  Freedom. 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  17 

TALLIRN. 

Freedom  lives ! 
Oppression  falls — for  France  has  felt  her  chains, 
Has  burst  them  too.     Who,  traitor-like,  stept  forth 
Amid  the  hall  of  Jacobins  to  save 
Camille  Desmoulins,  and  the  venal  wretch 
D'Egiantine  ? 

ROBESPIERRE. 

I  did — for  I  thought  them  honest. 
And  Heaven  forefend  that  vengeance  e'er  should  strike, 
Ere  justice  doom'd  the  blow. 

BAURERE. 

Traitor,  thou  didst. 
Yes,  the  accomplice  of  their  dark  designs, 
Awhile  didst  thou  defend  them,  when  the  storm 
Lour'd  at  safe  distance.  When  the  clouds  frown'd  darker, 
Fear'd  for  yourself,  and  left  them  to  their  fate. 
Oh,  I  have  mark'd  thee  long,  and  through  the  veil 
Seen  thy  foul  projects.     Yes,  ambitious  man, 
Self-will'd  dictator  o'er  the  realm  of  France, 
The  vengeance  thou  hast  plann'd  for  patriots. 
Falls  on  thy  head.     Look  how  thy  brother's  deeds 
Dishonour  thine  !  He,  the  firm  patriot ; 
Thou,  the  foul  parricide  of  Liberty  ! 

ROBESPIERRE  JUNIOR. 

Barrere — attempt  not  meanly  to  divide 
Me  from  my  brother.     I  partake  his  guilt, 
For  I  partake  his  virtue. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Brother,  by  my  soul. 
More  dear  I  hold  thee  to  my  heart,  that  thus 
With  me  thou  dar'st  to  tread  the  dangerous  path 
Of  virtue,  than  that  nature  twined  her  cords 
Of  kindred  round  us. 

BARRERE. 

Yes,  allied  in  onilt, 

VOL.    !.  c 


10  THE  FALL  OP  ROBESPIERRE. 

Even  as  in  blood  ye  are.     Oh,  tliou  worst  wretcli, 
Thou  worse  than  Sylla !  hast  thou  not  proscrib'd, 
Yea,  in  most  foul  anticipation  slaughter'd 
Each  patriot  representative  of  France  ? 

BOURDON   l'oISE. 

Was  not  the  younger  Caesar  too  to  reign 
O'er  all  our  valiant  armies  in  the  south, 
And  still  continue  there  his  merchant  wiles  ? 

ROBESPIERRE  JUNIOR. 

His  merchant  wiles  !  Oh,  grant  me  patience,  heaven ! 
Was  it  by  merchant  wiles  I  gain'd  you  back 
Toulon,  when  proudly  on  her  captive  towers 
Wav'd  high  the  English  flag?  or  fought  I  then 
With  merchant  wiles,  when  sword  in  hand  I  led 
Your  troops  to  conquest?  fought  I  merchant-like, 
Or  barter'd  I  for  victory,  when  death 
Strode  o'er  the  reeking  streets  with  giant  stride, 
And  shook  his  ebon  plumes,  and  sternly  smil'd 
Amid  the  bloody  banquet?  when  appall'd 
The  hireling  sons  of  England  spread  the  sail 
Of  safety,  fought  I  like  a  merchant  then  ? 
Oh,  patience  !  patience  ! 

BOURDON   l'oiSE. 

How  this  younger  tyrant 
Mouths  out  defiance  to  us !  even  so 
He  had  led  on  the  armies  of  the  south. 
Till  once  again  the  plains  of  France  were  drench'd 
With  her  best  blood. 

COLLOT  d'hERBOIS. 

Till  once  again  display 'd 
Lyons'  sad  tragedy  had  call'd  me  forth 
The  minister  of  wrath,  whilst  slaughter  by 
Had  bathed  in  human  blood. 

DUBOIS  GRANGE. 

No  wonder,  friend, 
That  we  are  traitors — that  our  heads  must  fall 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  19 

Beneatli  the  axe  of  death  !  when  Csesar-like 
Reigns  Robespierre,  'tis  wisely  done  to  doom 
The  fall  of  Brutus.     Tell  me,  bloody  man, 
Hast  thou  not  parcell'd  out  deluded  France 
As  it  had  been  some  province  won  in  fight 
Between  your  curst  triumvirate.     You,  Couthon, 
Go  with  my  brother  to  the  southern  plains ; 
St.  Just,  be  yours  the  army  of  the  north  ; 
Meantime  I  rule  at  Paris. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Matchless  knave! 
What — not  one  blush  of  conscience  on  thy  cheek — 
Not  one  poor  blush  of  truth  !  most  likely  tale  ! 
That  I,  who  ruin'd  Brissot's  towering  hopes, 
I,  who  discover'd  Hebert's  impious  wiles, 
And  sharp'd  for  Danton's  recreant  neck  the  axe. 
Should  now  be  traitor !  had  I  been  so  minded. 
Think  ye  I  had  destroy'd  the  very  men 
Whose  plots  resembled  mine  ?  bring  forth  your  proofs 
Of  this  deep  treason.     Tell  me  in  whose  breast 
Found  ye  the  fatal  scroll  ?  or  tell  me  rather 
Who  foreed  the  shameless  falsehood  ? 

COLLOT  d'hERBOIS. 

Ask  you  proofs  ? 
Robespierre,  what  proofs  were  ask'd  when  Brissotdied? 

LEGENDRE. 

What  proofs  adduced  you  when  the  Danton  died  ? 
When  at  the  imminent  peril  of  my  life 
I  rose,  and,  fearless  of  thy  frowning  brow, 
Proclaim'd  him  guiltless? 

ROBESPIERRE, 

I  remember  well 
The  fatal  day.     I  do  repent  me  much 
That  I  kill'd  Cgesar  and  spared  Antony. 
But  I  have  been  too  lenient.     I  have  spared 
The  stream  of  blood,  and  now  my  own  must  flow 


20  THE  FALL  OF  ROIJESPIEHRE. 

To  fill  the  current.  [Loud  Applauses. 

Triumph  not  too  soon, 
Justice  may  yet  be  victor. 

Enter  St.  Just,  and  mounts  the  Tribune. 

ST.  JUST. 

I  come  from  the  committee — charged  to  speak 
Of  matters  of  high  import.     I  omit 
Their  orders.     Representatives  of  France, 
Boldly  in  his  own  person  speaks  St.  Just 
What  his  own  heart  shall  dictate. 

TALLIEN. 

Hear  ye  this, 
Insulted  delegates  of  France  ?  St.  Just 
From  your  committee  comes — comes  charged  to  speak 
Of  matters  of  high  import — yet  omits 
Their  orders  !  Representatives  of  France, 
That  bold  man  I  denounce,  who  disobeys 
The  nation's  orders. — I  denounce  St.  Just. 

\_Loud  Applauses. 

ST.  JUST. 

Hear  me  !  [  Violent  Murmurs. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

He  shall  be  heard  ! 

BURDON   l'oISE. 

Must  we  contaminate  this  sacred  hall 
With  the  foul  breath  of  treason  ? 

COLLOT   d'hRRBOIS. 

Drag  him  away  ! 
Hence  with  him  to  the  bar. 

COUTHON. 

Oh,  just  proceedings  ! 
Robespierre  prevented  liberty  of  speech — 
And  Robespierre  is  a  tyrant !  Tallien  reigns, 
He  dreads  to  hear  the  voice  of  innocence — 
And  St.  Just  must  be  silent ! 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  21 

LEGENDRK. 

Heed  we  well 
That  justice  guide  our  actions.     No  light  import 
Attends  this  day.     I  move  St.  Just  be  heard. 

FRERON. 

Inviolate  be  the  sacred  right  of  man, 

The  freedom  of  debate.  [Violent  Applauses. 

ST.  JUST. 

I  may  be  heard  then  I  much  the  times  are  changed, 

When  St.  Just  thanks  this  hall  for  hearing  him. 

Robespierre  is  call'd  a  tyrant.     Men  of  France, 

Judge  not  too  soon.     By  popular  discontent 

Was  Aristides  driven  into  exile, 

Was  Phocion  murder'd !  Ere  ye  dare  pronounce 

Robespierre  is  guilty,  it  befits  ye  well, 

Consider  who  accuse  him.     Tallien, 

Bourdon  of  Oise — the  very  men  denounced, 

For  that  their  dark  intrigues  disturb'd  the  plan 

Of  o;overnment.     Legendre,  the  sworn  friend 

Of  Danton  fall'n  apostate.     Dubois  Crance, 

He  who  at  Lyons  spared  the  royalists — 

Collot  d'Herbois— 

BOURDON    l'oISE. 

What — shall  the  traitor  rear 
His  head  amid  our  tribune,  and  blaspheme 
Each  patriot  j^  shall  the  hireling  slave  of  faction — 

ST.  JUST. 

I  am  of  no  one  faction.     I  contend 
Against  all  factions. 

TALLIEN. 

I  espouse  the  cause 
Of  truth.     Robespierre  on  yester  morn  pronounced 
U{)on  his  own  authority  a  report. 
To-day  St.  Just  comes  down.     St.  Just  neglects 
What  the  committee  orders,  and  harangues 
From  his  own  will.     O  citizens  of  France, 


22  THE  FALL  OF   ROBESPIERRE. 

I  weep  for  you — I  weep  for  my  poor  country — 
I  tremble  for  the  cause  of  Liberty, 
When  individuals  shall  assume  the  sway, 
And  with  more  insolence  than  kingly  pride 
Rule  the  Republic. 

BILLAUD   VARENNES. 

Shudder,  ye  representatives  of  France, 
Shudder  with  horror.     Henriot  commands 
The  marshall'd  force  of  Paris.     Henriot, 
Foul  parricide — the  sworn  ally  of  Hebert 
Denounced  by  all — upheld  by  Robespierre. 
Who  spared  La  Valette?  who  promoted  him, 
Stain'd  with  the  deep  die  of  nobility  ? 
Who  to  an  ex-peer  gave  the  high  command  ? 
Who  screen'd  from  justice  the  rapacious  thief? 
Who  cast  in  chains  the  friends  of  Liberty  ? 
Robespierre,  the  self-styled  patriot,  Robespierre — 
Robespierre,  allied  with  villain  Daubigne — 
Robespierre,  the  foul  arch  tyrant,  Robespierre. 

BOURDON    l'oISE. 

He  talks  of  virtue — of  morality — 

Consistent  patriot !  he  Daubigne's  friend  I 

Henriot's  supporter  virtuous  !  preach  of  virtue. 

Yet  league  with  villains,  for  with  Robespierre 

Villains  alone  ally.     Thou  art  a  tyrant ! 

I  style  thee  tyrant,  Robespierre  !  [Loud  Applauses. 

ROBESPIERRE. 

Take  back  the  name.     Ye  citizens  of  France — 

[Violeut  Clamour.     Ci'ies  of- — Doivti  with  the  tyrant! 

TALLIEN. 

Oppression  falls.     The  traitor  stands  appall'd — 
Guilt's  iron  fangs  engrasp  his  shrinking  soul — 
He  hears  assembled  France  denounce  his  crimes  ! 
He  sees  the  mask  torn  from  his  secret  sins — 
He  trembles  on  the  precipice  of  fate. 
Fall'n  guilty  tyrant !  murder'd  by  thy  rage. 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  23 

How  many  an  innocent  victim's  blood  has  stain'd 

Fair  freedom's  altar  !   Sylla-like  thy  hand 

Mark'd  down  the  virtues,  that,  thy  foes  removed. 

Perpetual  Dictator  thou  might'st  reign, 

And  tyrannize  o'er  France,  and  call  it  freedom ! 

Long  time  in  timid  guilt  the  traitor  plann'd 

His  fearful  wiles — success  embolden'd  sin — 

And  his  stretch'd  arm  had  grasp'd  the  diadem 

Ere  now,  but  that  the  coward's  heart  recoil'd, 

Lest  France  awaked,  should  rouse  her  from  her  dream, 

And  call  aloud  for  vengeance.     He,  like  Caesar, 

With  rapid  step  urged  on  his  bold  career, 

Even  to  the  summit  of  ambitious  power. 

And  deem'd  the  name  of  King  alone  was  wanting. 

Was  it  for  this  we  hurl'd  proud  Capet  down  ? 

Is  it  for  this  we  wage  eternal  war 

Against  the  tyrant  horde  of  murderers. 

The  crowned  cockatrices  whose  foul  venom 

Infects  all  Europe  ?  was  it  then  for  this 

We  swore  to  guard  our  liberty  with  life. 

That  Robespierre  should  reign  ?  the  spirit  of  freedom 

Is  not  yet  sunk  so  low.     The  glowing  flame 

That  animates  each  honest  Frenchman's  heart 

Not  yet  extinguish'd.     I  invoke  thy  shade, 

Immortal  Brutus  !  I  too  wear  a  dagger ; 

And  if  the  representatives  of  France 

Through  fear  or  favour  should  delay  the  sword 

Of  justice,  Tallien  emulates  thy  virtues; 

Tallien,  like  Brutus,  lifts  the  avenging  arm  ; 

Tallien  shall  save  his  country.  IVio/ent  Applauses. 

BILLAUD  VARENNES. 

I  demand 
The  arrest  of  all  the  traitors.     Memorable 
Will  be  this  day  for  France. 

ROBESPIEIIUE. 

Yes !  Memorable 


24  THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE. 

This  day  will  be  for  France — for  villains  triumph. 

LEBAS. 

I  will  not  sliare  in  this  day's  damning  guilt. 
Condenni  me  too. 

\_Great  en/ — Doivn  with  the  tyrants!  The  tivo 
liobespierres,  Couthon,  St.  Just,  and  Lebas 
are  led  off. 

ACT  III. 

Scene  continues. 

COLLOT   d'hERBOIS.    , 

Csesar  is  fallen  !  The  baneful  tree  of  Java, 

Whose  death-distilling  boughs  dropt  poisonous  dew. 

Is  rooted  from  its  base.     This  worse  than  Cromwell, 

The  austere,  the  self-denying  Robespierre, 

Even  in  this  hall,  where  once  with  terror  mute 

We  listen 'd  to  the  hypocrite's  harangues, 

Has  heard  his  doom. 

BILLAUD  VARENNES. 

Yet  must  we  not  suppose 
The  tyrant  will  fall  tamely.     His  sworn  hireling 
Henriot,  the  daring  desperate  Henriot 
Commands  the  force  of  Paris.     I  denounce  him. 

FRERON. 

I  denounce  Fleuriot  too,  the  mayor  of  Paris. 
Enter  Dubois  Crance. 

DUBOIS  CRANCE. 

Robespierre  is  rescued.     Henriot,  at  the  head 
Of  the  arm'd  force,  has  rescued  the  fierce  tyrant. 

COLLOT   d'hERBOIS. 

Ring  the  tocsin — call  all  the  citizens 

To  save  their  country — never  yet  has  Paris 

Forsook  the  representatives  of  France. 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  20 

TALLIEN. 

It  is  the  hour  of  danger.     I  propose 

This  sitting  be  made  permanent.  [Loud  Applauses. 

COLLOT   d'hERBOIS. 

The  national  Convention  shall  remain 
Firm  at  its  post. 

Enter  a  Messenger. 

MESSENGER. 

Robespierre  has  reach'd  the  Commune.     They  espouse 
The  tyrant's  cause.     St.  Just  is  up  in  arms ! 
St.  Just — the  young,  ambitious,  bold  St.  Just 
Harangues  the  mob.     The  sanguinary  Couthon 
Thirsts  for  your  blood.  [Tocsin  rings. 

TALLIEN. 

These  tyrants  are  in  arms  against  the  law : 
Outlaw  the  rebels. 

Enter  Merlin  of  Douay. 

MERLIN. 

Health  to  the  representatives  of  France  ! 

I  pass'd  this  moment  through  the  armed  force — 

They  ask'd  my  name — and  when  they  heard  a  delegate. 

Swore  I  was  not  the  friend  of  France. 

COLLOT   d'hERBOIS. 

The  tyrants  threaten  us  as  when  they  turn'd 
The  cannon's  mouth  on  Brissot. 

Enter  another  Messenger. 

SECOND   MESSENGER. 

Vivier  harangues  the  Jacobins — the  club 
Espouse  the  cause  of  Robespierre. 

Etiter  another  Messenger. 

THIRD  messenger. 

All's  lost — the  tyrant  triuni])hs.     Hcnriut  leads 


26  THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIEIUIE. 

The  soldiers  to  his  aid. — Ah'eady  I  hear 
The  ratthng  cannon  destin'd  to  surround 
This  sacred  hall. 

TALLIEN. 

Why,  we  will  die  like  men  then. 
The  representatives  of  France  dare  death, 
When  duty  steels  their  bosoms.  [Loud  Applauses. 

TALLIEN  addressing  the  galleries. 

Citizens ! 
France  is  insulted  in  her  delecrates — 
The  majesty  of  the  Republic  is  insulted — 
Tyrants  are  up  in  arms.     An  armed  force 
Threats  the  Convention.     The  Convention  swears 
To  die,  or  save  the  country ! 

[Violent  Applauses  front  the  galleries. 
ciTizETS  Jroni  above. 

We  too  swear 
To  die,  or  save  the  country.     Follow  me. 

[All  the  men  quit  the  galleries. 

Enter  another  Messenger. 

FOURTH  MESSENGER. 

Henriot  is  taken  ! —  [Loud  Applauses. 

Henriot  is  taken.     Three  of  your  brave  soldiers 

Swore  they  would  seize  the  rebel  slave  of  tyrants. 

Or  perish  in  the  attempt.     As  he  patroU'd 

The  streets  of  Paris,  stirring  up  the  mob. 

They  seized  him.  [Applauses. 

BILLAUD  VARENNES. 

Let  the  names  of  these  brave  men 
•Live  to  the  future  day. 

Enter  Bourdon  l'Oise,  sword  in  hand. 

BOURDON    l'oISE. 

I  have  clear'd  the  Commune.  [Applauses. 

Tinough  the  throng  1  rush'd, 


THE  FALL  OF  ROBESPIERRE.  27 

Brandishing-  my  good  sword  to  drench  its  blade 

Deep  in  the  tyrant's  heart.     The  timid  rebels 

Gave  way.     I  met  the  soldiery — I  spake 

Of  the  dictator's  crimes — of  patriots  chain'd 

In  dark  deep  dungeons  by  his  lawless  rage — 

Of  knaves  secure  beneath  his  fostering  power. 

I  spake  of  Liberty.     Their  honest  hearts 

Caught  the  warm  flame.    The  general  shout  burst  forth, 

"  Live  the  Convention — Down  with  Robespierre  !" 

[Apjjlaiises. 
Shouts  from  without — Down  icith  the  tyrant ! 

TALLIEN. 

I  hear,  I  hear  the  soul-inspiring  sounds, 

France  shall  be  saved  !  her  generous  sons  attach'd 

To  principles,  not  persons,  spurn  the  idol 

They  worshipp'd  once.     Yes,  Robespierre  shall  fall 

As  Capet  fell !  Oh  !  never  let  us  deem 

That  France  shall  crouch  beneath  a  tyrant's  throne, 

That  the  almighty  people  who  have  broke 

On  their  oppressors'  heads  the  oppressive  chain. 

Will  court  again  their  fetters  !  easier  were  it 

To  hurl  the  cloud-capt  mountain  from  its  base, 

Than  force  the  bonds  of  slavery  upon  men 

Determined  to  be  free  !  {^Applauses. 

Enter  Legend  re,  a  Pistolin  one  hand,  Kei/s  in  the  other. 

i,EGET^ BEE., Jiinging  down  the  Keys. 
So — let  the  mutinous  Jacobins  meet  now 
Li  the  open  air.  [Loud  Aj^plauses. 

A  factious,  turbulent  party. 
Lording  it  o'er  the  state  since  Danton  died, 
And  with  him  the  Cordeliers. — A  hireling  band 
Of  loud-tongued  orators  controll'd  the  club, 
And  bade  them  bow  the  knee  to  Robespierre. 
Vivier  has  'seap'd  me.     Curse  his  coward  heart — 
This  fate-fraught  tube  of  Justice  in  my  hand, 


28  THE   FALL  OF   ROBESl'IERRE. 

I  rusli'd  into  the  ball.     He  mark'd  mine  eye. 

That  beam'd  its  patriot  anger,  and  flash'd  full 

With  death-denouncinfj  nieanino-.     'Mid  the  throno- 

He  mingled.     I  pursued — but  staid  my  hand, 

Lest  haply  I  might  shed  the  innocent  blood.  [Ajip/auses. 

FRERON. 

They  took  from  me  my  ticket  of  admission — 

Expell'd  me  from  their  sittings. — Now,  forsooth, 

Humbled  and  trembling  re-insert  my  name. 

But  Freron  enters  not  the  club  awain 

Till  it  be  purged  of  guilt — till,  purified 

Of  tyrants  and  of  traitors,  honest  men 

May  breathe  the  air  in  safety.         [Shotitsfroin  ivilhoiit. 

BARRERE. 

What  means  this  uproar !  if  the  tyrant  band 
Should  gain  the  people  once  again  to  rise — 
We  are  as  dead  ! 

TALLIEN. 

And  wherefore  fear  we  death  ? 
Did  Brutus  fear  it?  or  the  Grecian  friends 
Who  buried  in  Hipparchus'  breast  the  sword. 
And  died  triumphant?  Caesar  should  fear  death, 
Brutus  must  scorn  the  bugbear. 

\_Shoiitsfrom  without.     Live  the  Convention 
— Doivn  with  the  tyratits ! 

TALLIEN. 

Hark  !  again 
The  sounds  of  honest  Freedom  ! 

Enter  Deputies  from  the  Sections. 

CITIZEN. 

Citizens  !  representatives  of  France  ! 
Hold  on  your  steady  course.     The  men  of  Paris 
Espouse  your  cause.     The  men  of  Paris  swear 
They  will  defend  the  delegates  of  Freedom, 


THE  FALL  0{^  ROBESPIERRE.  29 

TALLIEN. 

Hear  ye  this,  colleagues  ?  hear  ye  this,  my  brethren  ? 

And  does  no  thrill  of  joy  pervade  your  breasts  ? 

My  bosom  bounds  to  rapture.     I  have  seen 

The  sons  of  France  shake  off  the  tyrant  yoke; 

I  have,  as  much  as  lies  in  mine  own  arm, 

Hurl'd  down  the  usurper. — Come  death  when  it  will, 

I  have  lived  long  enough.  [S/iotits  ivithout. 

BARRERE. 

Hark  !  how  the  noise  increases  !  through  the  gloom 
Of  the  still  evening — harbinp;er  of  death 
Rings  the  tocsin  !  the  dreadful  generale 
Thunders  through  Paris — 

[CVj/  without — Doum  xoith  the  tyrant  ! 

Enter  Lecointre. 

LECOINTRE. 

So  may  eternal  justice  blast  the  foes 

Of  France  !  so  perish  all  the  tyrant  brood. 

As  Robespierre  has  perish 'd  !  Citizens, 

Csesar  is  taken.  [Loud  and  repeated  Applauses. 

I  marvel  not,  that,  with  such  fearless  front. 

He  braved  our  vengeance,  and  with  angry  eye 

Scowl'd  round  the  hall  defiance.     He  relied 

On  Henriot's  aid — the  Commune's  villain  friendship, 

And  Henriot's  bouohten  succours.     Ye  have  heard 

How  Henriot  rescued  him — how  with  open  arms 

The  Commune  welcomed  in  the  rebel  tyrant — 

How  Fleuriot  aided,  and  seditious  Vivier 

Stirr'd  up  the  Jacobins.     All  had  been  lost — 

The  representatives  of  France  had  perish'd — 

Freedom  had  sunk  beneath  the  tyrant  arm 

Of  this  foul  parricide,  but  that  her  spirit 

Inspired  the  men  of  Paris.     Henriot  call'd 

"  To  arms"  in  vain,  whilst  Bourdon's  patriot  voice 

Breathed  eloquence,  and  o'er  the  Jacobins 


30  THE  FALL  OF   lyjllESPIliRRE. 

Legendre  frown'd  dismay.     The  tyrants  fled — 

They  reach'd  the  Hotel.    We  gather'd  round — we  call'd 

For  vengeance  !  Long  time,  obstinate  in  despair, 

With  knives  they  hack'd  around  them.     Till  foreboding 

The  sentence  of  the  law,  the  clamorous  cry 

Of  joyful  thousands  hailing  their  destruction, 

Each  sought  by  suicide  to  escape  the  dread 

Of  death.     Lebas  succeeded.     From  the  window 

Leap'd  the  younger  Robespierre;  but  his  fractur'd  limb 

Forbade  to  escape.     The  self-will'd  dictator 

Plung'd  often  the  keen  knife  in  his  dark  breast. 

Yet  impotent  to  die.     He  lives,  all  mangled 

By  his  own  tremulous  hand  !  All  gash'd  and  gored. 

He  lives  to  taste  the  bitterness  of  death. 

Even  now  they  meet  their  doom.     The  bloody  Coutlion, 

The  fierce  St.  Just,  even  now  attend  their  tyrant 

To  fall  beneath  the  axe.     I  saw  the  torches 

Flash  on  their  visages  a  dreadful  light — 

I  saw  them  whilst  the  black  blood  roll'd  adown 

Each  stern  face,  even  then  with  dauntless  eye 

Scowl  round  contemptuous,  dying  as  they  lived. 

Fearless  of  fate!  [Loud  and  repeated  Applauses. 

Barrere  mounts  the  Tribune. 

For  ever  hallow'd  be  this  glorious  day, 
When  Freedom,  bursting  her  oppressive  chain, 
Tramples  on  the  oppressor.     When  the  tyrant, 
Hurl'd  from  his  blood-cemented  throne  by  the  arm 
Of  the  almighty  people,  meets  the  death 
He  plann'd  for  thousands.     Oh  !  my  sickening  heart 
Has  sunk  within  me,  when  the  various  woes 
Of  my  brave  country  crowded  o'er  my  brain 
In  ghastly  numbers — when  assembled  hordes, 
Dragg'd  from  their  hovels  by  despotic  power, 
Rush'd  o'er  her  frontiers,  plunder'd  her  fair  hamlets. 
And  sack'd  her  populous  towns,  and  tlrench'd  with  blood 


THE  FALL  OF   ROBESPIERRE.  31 

The  reeking  fields  of  Flanders. — When  within, 

Upon  her  vitals  prey'd  the  rankling  tooth 

Of  treason;  and  oppression,  giant  form. 

Trampling  on  freedom,  left  the  alternative 

Of  slavery,  or  of  death.     Even  from  that  day, 

When,  on  the  guilty  Capet,  I  pronounced 

The  doom  of  injured  France,  has  faction  rear'd 

Her  hated  head  amongst  us.     Roland  preach 'd 

Of  mercy — the  uxorious,  dotard  Roland, 

The  vvoman-govern'd  Roland  durst  aspire 

To  govern  France ;  and  Petion  talk'd  of  virtue, 

And  Vergniaud's  eloquence,  like  the  honey'd  tongue 

Of  some  soft  Syren  wooed  us  to  destruction. 

W^e  triumph'd  over  these.     On  the  same  scaffold 

Where  the  last  Louis  pour'd  his  guilty  blood. 

Fell  Brissot's  head,  the  womb  of  darksome  treasons, 

And  Orleans,  villain  kinsman  of  the  Capet, 

And  Hebert's  atheist  crew,  whose  maddening  hand 

Hurl'd  down  the  altars  of  the  livino;  God, 

With  all  the  infidel's  intolerance. 

The  last  worst  traitor  triumph'd — triumph'd  long, 

Secured  by  matchless  villany.     By  turns 

Defending  and  deserting  each  accomplice 

As  interest  prompted.     In  the  goodly  soil 

Of  Freedom,  the  foul  tree  of  treason  struck 

Its  deep-fix'd  roots,  and  dropt  the  dews  of  death 

On  all  who  slumber'd  in  its  specious  shade. 

He  wove  the  web  of  treachery.     He  caught 

The  listening  crowd  by  his  wild  eloquence, 

His  cool  ferocity  that  persuaded  murder. 

Even  whilst  it  spake  of  mercy  ! — never,  never 

Shall  this  regenerated  country  wear 

The  despot  yoke.     Though  myriads  round  assail. 

And  with  worse  fury  urge  this  new  crusade 

Than  savages  have  known  ;  though  the  leagued  des])ots 

Depopulate  all  Europe,  so  to  pour 


32  THE  FALL  OF   ROHESPlERRr.. 

The  accumulated  mass  upon  our  coasts, 
Sublime  amid  the  storm  shall  France  arise, 
And  like  the  rock  amid  surrounding  waves 
Repel  the  rushing  ocean. — She  shall  wield 
The  thunder-bolt  of  vengeance — she  shall  blast 
The  despot's  pride,  and  liberate  the  world  ! 


POEMS. 


— medio  de  fonte  lepomm 
Surgit  amari  aliquid. Lucret. 

Julia  was  blest  with  beauty,  wit,  and  grace  : 
Small  poets  loved  to  sing  her  blooming  face. 
Before  her  altars,  lo !  a  numerous  train 
Preferr'd  their  vows ;  yet  all  preferr'd  in  vain  : 
Till  charming  Florio,  born  to  conquer,  came. 
And  touch'd  the  fair  one  with  an  equal  flame. 
The  flame  she  felt,  and  ill  could  she  conceal 
What  every  look  and  action  would  reveal. 
With  boldness  then,  which  seldom  fails  to  move. 
He  pleads  the  cause  of  marriage  and  of  love ; 
The  course  of  hymeneal  joys  he  rounds. 
The  fair  one's  eyes  dance  pleasure  at  the  sounds. 
Nouo;ht  now  remain'd  but  "  Noes" — how  little  meant- 
And  the  sweet  coyness  that  endears  consent. 
The  youth  upon  his  knees  enraptur'd  fell : — 
The  strange  misfortune,  oh  !  what  words  can  tell  ? 
Tell !  ye  neglected  sylphs  !  who  lap-dogs  guard, 
Why  snatch'd  ye  not  away  your  precious  ward  ? 
Why  suffer'd  ye  the  lover's  weight  to  fall 
On  the  ill-fated  neck  of  much-loved  Ball? 
The  favourite  on  his  mistress  cast  his  eyes, 
Gives  a  short  melancholy  howl,  and — dies ! 
Sacred  his  ashes  lie,  and  long  his  rest ! 
Anger  and  grief  divide  poor  Julia's  breast, 
vol..  1.  D 


34  POEMS. 

Her  eyes  she  fix'cl  on  guilty  Flurio  first, 
On  him  the  storm  of  angry  grief  must  burst. 
That  storm  he  fled  : — he  wooes  a  kinder  fair, 
Whose  fond  affections  no  dear  puppies  share. 
'Twere  vain  to  tell  how  Julia  pined  away ; — 
Unhappy  fair,  that  in  one  luckless  day 
(From  future  almanacks  the  day  be  crost !) 
At  once  her  lover  and  her  lap-dog  lost ! 

1789.* 


I  YET  remain 

To  mourn  the  hours  of  youth  (yet  mourn  in  vain) 
That  fled  neglected :  wisely  thou  hast  trod 
The  better  path — and  that  high  meed  which  God 
Assign'd  to  virtue,  tow'ring  from  the  dust, 
Shall  wait  thy  rising,  Spirit  pure  and  just ! 

O  God  !  how  sweet  it  were  to  think,  that  all 
Who  silent  mourn  around  this  gloomy  ball 
Might  hear  the  voice  of  joy; — but  'tis  the  will 
Of  man's  great  Author,  that  through  good  and  ill 
Calm  he  should  hold  his  course,  and  so  sustain 
His  varied  lot  of  pleasure,  toil,  and  pain  ! 

1793.t 

*  Tliis  copy  of  verses  was  wriUen  at  Clirist's  Hospital,  and  transcribed, 
honoih  causa,  into  the  book  kept  by  the  head-master,  Mr.  Bowyer,  for 
that  purpose.  Tliey  are  printed  by  Mr.  Trollope  in  p.  192  of  iiis  His- 
tory of  the  Hospital,  published  in  1834.     Ed. 

t  These  lines  were  found  in  Mr.  Coleridge's  hand-writing  in  one  of 
the  Prayer  Books  in  the  cliapel  of  Jesus  College,  Cambridge.     Ed. 


POEMS.  35 


TO  THE  REV.  W.  J.  HORT.- 

Hush  !  ye  clamorous  cares,  be  mute  ! 

Again,  dear  harmonist !   again 
Through  the  hollow  of  thy  flute 

Breathe  that  passion-warbled  strain  ; 
Till  memory  back  each  form  shall  bring 

The  loveliest  of  her  shadowy  throng, 
And  hope,  that  soars  on  sky-lark  wing, 

Shall  carol  forth  her  gladdest  song ! 

O  skill'd  with  magic  spell  to  roll 

The  tlirillino;  tones  that  concentrate  the  soul ! 

Breathe  through  thy  flute  those  tender  notes  again, 

While  near  thee  sits  the  chaste-eyed  maiden  mild  ; 

And  bid  her  raise  the  poet's  kindred  strain 

In  soft  impassion'd  voice,  correctly  wild. 

In  freedom's  undivided  dell. 
Where  toil  and  health  with  mellow'd  love  shall  dwell — 

Far  from  folly,  far  from  men. 

In  the  rude  romantic  glen. 

Up  the  clift",  and  through  the  glade, 

Wand'rino-  with  the  dear-loved  maid, 

I  shall  listen  to  the  lay. 

And  ponder  on  thee  far  away ; — 
Still  as  she  bids  those  thrilling  notes  aspire 
(Making  my  fond  attuned  heart  her  lyre), 
Thy  honour'd  form,  my  friend  !   shall  reappear. 
And  I  will  thank  thee  with  a  raptured  tear  ! 

1794. 

*  Mr.  Hort  was  a  Unitarian  clerg7man,and  in  1794  second  master  in 
Mr.  (afterwards  Dr.)  Estlin's  school  on  St.  Michael's  Hill,  Bristol.    Ed. 


^n  FOE  MS. 


TO    CHARLES    LAMB, 

WITH  AS  UNFINISHED  POEM. 

Thus  far  my  scanty  brain  hath  built  the  rhyme 

Elaborate  and  swelling ; — yet  the  heart 

Not  owns  it.     From  thy  spirit-breathing  powers 

I  ask  not  now,  my  friend  !  the  aiding  verse 

Tedious  to  thee,  and  from  thy  anxious  thought 

Of  dissonant  mood.     In  fancy  (well  I  know) 

From  business  wand'ring  far  and  local  cares. 

Thou  creepest  round  a  dear-loved  sister's  bed 

With  noiseless  step,  and  watchest  the  faint  look, 

Soothing  each  pang  with  fond  solicitude, 

And  tenderest  tones  medicinal  of  love. 

I,  too,  a  sister  had,  an  only  sister — * 

She  loved  me  dearly,  and  I  doted  on  her ; 

To  her  I  pour'd  forth  all  my  puny  sorrows ; 

(As  a  sick  patient  in  a  nurse's  arms,) 

And  of  the  heart  those  hidden  maladies — 

That  e'en  from  friendship's  eye  will  shrink  ashamed. 

O  !  I  have  waked  at  midnight,  and  have  wept 

Because  she  was  not ! — Cheerily,  dear  Charles  ! 

Thou  thy  best  friend  shalt  cherish  many  a  year; 

Such  warm  presages  feel  I  of  high  hope ! 

For  not  uninterested  the  dear  maid 

I've  view'd — her  soul  affectionate  yet  wise. 

Her  polish'd  wit  as  mild  as  lambent  glories 

That  play  around  a  sainted  infant's  head. 

He  knows  (the  Spirit  that  in  secret  sees, 

Of  whose  omniscient  and  all-spreading  love 

*  This  line  and  the  six  and  a  half  which  follow  are  printed,  by  mis- 
take, as  a  fragment  in  tlie  first  volume  of  the  Poetical  Works,  1834, 
p.  35.     Ed. 


POEMS.  37 

Aught  to  implore  were  impotence  of  mind  !)* 

That  my  mute  thoughts  are  sad  before  his  throne, — 

Prepared,  when  He  his  healing  ray  vouchsafes, 

Thanksgiving  to  pour  forth  with  lifted  heart, 

And  praise  him  gracious  with  a  brother's  joy  ! 

1794. 

*  "  I  utterly  recant  the  sentiment  contained  in  the  lines, 
Of  whose  omniscient  and  all-spreading  love 
Aught  to  implore  were  impotence  of  mind, — 
it  being  written  in  Scripture,  Ask,  and  it  shall  be  given  you !  and  my 
human  reason  being,  moreover,  convinced  of  the  propriety  of  oftering 
petitions  as  well  as  thanksgivings  to  Deity."     S.  T.  C.  1797. 

"  I  will  add,  at  the  risk  of  appearing  to  dwell  too  long  on  religious 
topics,  that  on  this  my  first  introduction  to  Coleridge,  he  reverted  with 
strong  compunction  to  a  sentiment  which  he  had  expressed  in  earlier 
days  upon  prayer.     In  one  of  his  youthful  poems,  speaking  of  God,  he 

had  said, — 

— '  Of  whose  all-seeing  eye 
Aught  to  demand  were  impotence  of  mind.' 

This  sentiment  he  now  so  utterly  condemned,  that,  on  the  contrary,  he 
told  me,  as  his  own  peculiar  opinion,  that  the  act  of  praying  was  the  high- 
est energy  of  which  the  human  heart  was  capable — praying,  that  is,  with 
the  total  concentration  of  the  faculties ;  and  the  great  mass  of  worldly 
men  and  of  learned  men  he  pronounced  absolutely  incapable  of  pray- 
ing." Mr.  De  Quincry  in  Taifs  Magazine,  September,  1834,  p.  515. 
"  Mr.  Coleridge,  within  two  years  of  his  death,  very  solemnly  de- 
clared to  me  his  conviction  upon  the  same  subject.  I  was  sitting  by  his 
bed-side  one  afternoon,  and  he  fell — an  unusual  thing  for  him — into  a 
long  account  of  many  passages  of  his  past  life,  lamenting  some  things, 
condemning  otliers,  but  complaining  withal,  though  very  gently,  of  the 
way  in  which  many  of  liis  most  innocent  acts  had  been  cruelly  misre- 
presented. '  But  I  have  no  difficulty,'  said  he,  'in  forgiveness;  indeed, 
I  know  not  how  to  say  with  sincerity  the  clause  in  the  Lord's  Prayer, 
which  asks  forgiveness  us  we  forgive.  I  feel  nothing  answering  to  it  in 
my  heart.  Neither  do  I  find,  or  reckon,  the  most  solemn  faith  in  God 
as  a  real  object,  the  most  arduous  act  of  the  reason  and  will ; — O  no  ! 
my  dear,  it  is  to  pray,  to  pray  as  God  would  have  us ;  this  is  what  at 
times  makes  me  turn  cold  to  my  soul.  Believe  me,  to  pray  with  all 
your  heart  and  strength,  with  the  reason  and  the  will,  to  believe  vividly 
that  God  will  listen  to  your  voice  through  Christ,  and  verily  do  the  thing 
he  pleaseth  thereupon — this  is  the  last,  the  greatest  achievement  of  the 
Christian's  warfare  on  earth.  Tench  us  to  pray,  O  Lord  ! '  And  then 
he  burst  into  a  flood  nf  tears,  and  begged  me  to  pray  for  him.  O  what 
a  sight  was  there!"     Table  Talk,  vol.  i.  p.  162,  n.     Eel. 


3^  POEMS. 


TO  THE  NIGHTINGALE. 

Sister  of  lovelorn  poets,  Philomel ! 
How  many  bards  in  city  garret  spent, 
While  at  their  window  they  with  downward  eye 
Mark  the  faint  lamp-beam  on  the  kenncll'd  mud, 
And  listen  to  the  drowsy  cry  of  watchmen, 
(Those  hoarse,  unfeather'd  nightingales  of  time  !) 
How  many  wretched  bards  address  thy  name, 
And  hers,  the  full-orb'd  queen,  that  shines  above. 
But  I  do  hear  thee,  and  the  high  bough  mark, 
Within  whose  mild  moon-mellow'd  foliage  hid, 
Thou  warblest  sad  thy  pity-pleading  strains. 

0  I  have  listen'd,  till  my  working  soul. 
Waked  by  those  strains  to  thousand  phantasies, 
Absorb'd,  hath  ceas'd  to  listen  !  Therefore  oft 

1  hymn  thy  name ;  and  witli  a  proud  delight 
Oft  will  I  tell  thee,  minstrel  of  the  moon. 
Most  musical,  most  melancholy  bird  ! 

That  all  thy  soft  diversities  of  tone, 
Thoudi  sweeter  far  than  the  delicious  airs 
That  vibrate  from  a  white-arm'd  lady's  harp, 
What  time  the  languishment  of  lonely  love 
Melts  in  her  eye,  and  heaves  her  breast  of  snow, 
Are  not  so  sweet,  as  is  the  voice  of  her. 
My  Sara — best  beloved  of  human  kind  ! 
When  breathing  the  pure  soul  of  tenderness. 
She  thrills  me  with  the  husband's  promised  name 

1794. 


POEMS.  39 


TO  SARA. 

The  stream  with  languid  murmur  creeps 

111  Lumin's  flowery  vale; 
Beneath  the  dew  the  lily  weeps, 

Slow  waving  to  the  gale. 

"  Cease,  restless  gale,"  it  seems  to  say, 
"  Nor  wake  me  with  thy  sighing: 

The  honours  of  my  vernal  day 
On  rapid  wings  are  flying. 

"  To-morrow  shall  the  traveller  come. 
That  erst  beheld  me  blooming, 

His  searching  eye  shall  vainly  roam 
The  dreary  vale  of  Lumin." 

With  eager  gaze  and  wetted  cheek 

My  wonted  haunts  along. 
Thus,  lovely  maiden,  thou  shalt  seek 

The  youth  of  simplest  song. 

But  I  alono-  the  breeze  will  roll 

The  voice  of  feeble  power. 
And  dwell,  the  moon-beam  of  thy  soul, 

In  slumber's  nightly  hour. 

1794. 


40  I'OLMS. 


TO  JOSEPH  COTTLE. 

Un BOASTFUL  Bard  !  whose  verse  concise,  yet  clear. 

Tunes  to  smooth  melody  unconquer'd  sense, 

May  your  fame  fadeless  live,  as  never-sere 

The  ivy  wreathes  yon  oak,  whose  broad  defence 

Embowers  me  from  noon's  sultry  influence  ! 

For,  like  that  nameless  rivulet  stealing  by, 

Your  modest  verse  to  musing  quiet  dear. 

Is  rich  with  tints  heaven-borrovv'd  ; — the  charm'd  eye 

Shall  gaze  undazzled  there,  and  love  the  soften'd  sky. 

Circling  the  base  of  the  poetic  mount, 
A  stream  there  is,  which  rolls  in  lazy  flow 
Its  coal-black  waters  from  oblivion's  fount : 
The  vapour-poison'd  birds,  that  fly  too  low, 
Fall  with  dead  swoop,  and  to  the  bottom  go. 
Escaped  that  heavy  stream  on  pinion  fleet 
Beneath  the  mountain's  lofty-frowning  brow, 
Ere  aught  of  perilous  ascent  you  meet, 
A  mead  of  mildest  charm  delays  th'  unlabouring  feet. 

Not  there  the  cloud-climb'd  rock,  sublime  and  vast, 
That,  like  some  giant  king,  o'er-glooms  the  hill ; 
Nor  there  the  pine-grove  to  the  midnight  blast 
Makes  solemn  music  !  but  th'  unceasing  rill 
To  the  soft  wren  or  lark's  descending  trill. 
Murmurs  sweet  undersong  mid  jasmine  bowers. 
In  this  same  pleasant  meadow,  at  your  will, 
I  ween,  you  wander'd — there  collecting  flowers 
Of  sober  tint,  and  herbs  of  med'cinable  powers  ! 


POEMS.  41 

There  for  the  monarch-murder'd  soldier's  tomb 
You  wove  th'  unfinish'd  wreath  of  saddest  hues ; 
And  to  that  hoher  chaplet  added  bloom, 
Besprinkling  it  with  Jordan's  cleansing  dews. 
But  lo  !  your  Henderson  awakes  the  Muse — 
His  spirit  beckon'd  from  the  mountain's  height ! 
You  left  the  plain,  and  soar'd  mid  richer  views. 
So  Nature  mourn'd,  when  sank  the  first  day's  light, 
With  stars,  unseen  before,  spangling  her  robe  of  night ! 

Still  soar,  my  friend  !  those  richer  views  among. 
Strong,  rapid,  fervent,  flashing  fancy's  beam ! 
Virtue  and  truth  shall  love  your  gentler  song; 
But  poesy  demands  th'  impassion'd  theme. 
Wak'd  by  heaven's  silent  dews  at  eve's  mild  gleam, 
What  balmy  sweets  Pomona  breathes  around  ! 
But  if  the  vext  air  rush  a  stormy  stream. 
Or  autumn's  shrill  gust  moan  in  plaintive  sound, 
With  fruits  and  flowers  she  loads  the  tempcst-honour'd 
ground!  1795. 


CASIMIR. 

If  we  except  Lucretius  and  Statins,  I  know  no  Latin 
poet,  ancient  or  modern,  who  has  equalled  Casimir 
in  boldness  of  conception,  opulence  of  fancy,  or 
beauty  of  versification.  The  Odes  of  this  illustrious 
Jesuit  were  translated  into  English  about  150  years 
ago,  by  a  G.  Hils,  I  think.*  I  never  saw  the  trans- 
lation. A  few  of  the  Odes  have  been  translated 
in  a  very  animated  manner  by  Watts.     I  have  sub- 

*  The  Odes  of  Casimire  translated  by  G.  H.     [G.  Hils.]  Londor?, 
1646.   12mo.   Ed. 


42  I'OEMS. 

joined  the  third  Ode  of  the  second  Book,  which, 
with  the  exception  of  the  first  Hne,  is  an  effusion 
of  exquisite  elegance.  In  the  imitation  attempted, 
I  am  sensible  that  I  have  destroyed  the  effect  of 
suddenness,  by  translating  into  two  stanzas  what  is 
one  in  the  original.  1 796. 


AD   LYRAM. 

SoNORA  buxi  filia  sutilis, 
Pendebis  alta,  barbite,  populo, 
Dum  ridet  aer,  et  supinas 
Solicitat  levis  aura  frondes. 

Te  sibilantis  lenior  halitus 
Perflabit  Euri :  me  juvet  interim 
CoUum  reclinasse,  et  virenti 
Sic  temere*  jacuisse  ripa. 

Eheu  !  serenum  qua3  nebuliB  tegunt 
Repente  calum  !  quis  sonus  imbrium 
Surgamus — heu  semper  fugaci 
Gaudia  prseteritura  passu ! 


IMITATION. 

The  solemn-breathing  air  is  ended — 
Cease,  O  Lyre  !  thy  kindred  lay  ! 

From  the  poplar  branch  suspended. 
Glitter  to  the  eye  of  day  ! 

*  Had  Ciisiinir  any  better  aulliority  fur  this  quantity  than   Tertul- 
lians  line, — 

Inimcmor  ille  Dei  temcie  commiltere  tale — ? 
In  the  classic  poets  the  last  syllabic  is,  I  believe,  uniformly  eut  off. 

Jul. 


POEMS. 

On  thy  wires,  hov'ring,  dying, 
Softly  sighs  the  summer  wind  : 

I  will  slumber,  careless  lying, 
By  yon  waterfall  reclin'd. 

In  the  forest  hollow-roaring, 

Hark  !   I  hear  a  deep'ning  sound — 

Clouds  rise  thick  with  heavy  low'ring  ! 
See  !  th'  horizon  blackens  romid  ! 

Parent  of  the  soothing  measure. 
Let  me  seize  thy  wetted  string  ! 

Swiftly  flies  the  flatterer,  pleasure, 
Hcadlono-,  ever  on  the  wing  ! 


43 


DARWINIANA. 

THE  HOUR  WHEN  WE  SHALL  MEET  AGAIN. 

(composed  during  ILLNliSS  AND  IN  ABSENCE.) 

Dim  Hour  !  that  sleep 'st  on  pillowing  clouds  afar, 
O  rise,  and  yoke  the  turtles  to  thy  car ! 
Bend  o'er  the  traces,  blame  each  lingering  dove, 
And  give  me  to  the  bosom  of  my  love  ! 
My  gentle  love  !  caressing  and  carest. 
With  heaving  heart  shall  cradle  me  to  rest ; 
Shed  the  warm  tear-drop  from  her  smiling  eyes, 
Lull  witli  fond  woe,  and  med'cine  me  with  sighs; 
While  Hncly-flushing  float  her  kisses  meek, 
Like  melted  rubies,  o'er  my  pallid  cheek. 


44  POEMS. 

Chill'd  by  the  night,  the  drooping  rose  of  May 
Mourns  the  long  absence  of  the  lovely  day : 
Young  Day  returning  at  her  promised  hour, 
Weeps  o'er  the  sorrows  of  the  fav'rite  flower, — 
Weeps  the  soft  dew,  the  balmy  gale  she  sighs, 
And  darts  a  trembling  lustre  from  her  eyes. 
New  life  and  joy  th'  expanding  flow'rct  feels: 
His  pitying  mistress  mourns,  and  mourning  heals  ! 

1796. 


In  my  calmer  moments  I  have  the  firmest  faith  that 
all  things  work  together  for  good.  But,  alas  !  it  seems 
a  long  and  a  dark  process : — 

The  early  year's  fast-flying  vapours  stray 
In  shadowing  trains  across  the  orb  of  day  ; 
And  we,  poor  insects  of  a  few  short  hours, 
Deem  it  a  world  of  gloom. 
Were  it  not  better  hope,  a  nobler  doom. 
Proud  to  believe,  that  with  more  active  powers 
On  rapid  many-colour'd  wing. 
We  thro'  one  bright  perpetual  spring 
Shall  hover  round  the  fruits  and  flowers, 
Screen'd  by  those  clouds,  and  cherish'd  by  those  showers ! 

1796. 


POEMS.  45 


COUNT  RUM  FORD'S  ESSAYS. 

These,  Virtue,  are  thy  triumphs,  that  adorn 
Fitliest  our  nature,  and  bespeak  us  born 
For  loftiest  action ; — not  to  gaze  and  run 
From  chme  to  chme ;  or  batten  in  the  sun, 
Dragging  a  drony  flight  from  flower  to  flowei', 
Like  summer  insects  in  a  gaudy  hour ; 
Nor  yet  o'er  lovesick  tales  with  fancy  range. 
And  cry,  '  'Tis  pitiful,  'tis  passing  strange  !' 
But  on  life's  varied  views  to  look  around, 
And  raise  expiring  sorrow  from  the  ground : — 
And  he — who  thus  hath  borne  his  part  assign'd 
In  the  sad  fellowship  of  human  kind. 
Or  for  a  moment  soothed  the  bitter  pain 
Of  a  poor  brother — has  not  lived  in  vain. 

1796. 


EPIGRAMS. 

ON  A  LATE  MARRIAGE  BETWEEN   AN  OLD  MAID  AND 
A  FRENCH  PETIT  MAITRE. 

Tho'  Miss 's  match  is  a  subject  of  mirth, 

She  consider'd  the  matter  full  well, 

And  wisely  preferr'd  leading  one  ape  on  earth 
To  perhaps  a  whole  dozen  in  hell. 

1796. 


46  p()i:ms. 


ON    AN   AMOi:OUS   DOCTOR. 

FiiOiM  Rufa's  eye  sly  Cupid  sljot  his  dart, 
And  left  it  sticking  in  Sangrado's  heart. 
No  quiet  from  that  moment  has  he  known, 
And  peaceful  sleep  has  from  his  eyelids  flown; 
And  opium's  force,  and  what  is  more,  alack  ! 
His  own  orations  cainiot  bring  it  back. 
In  short,  unless  she  pities  his  afflictions, 
Despair  will  make  him  take  his  own  prescriptions. 

1796. 


There  comes  from  old  Avaro's  orave 
A  deadly  stench  ; — why,  sure,  they  have 


Immured  his  soul  within  his  grave 


179G. 


liAST  Monday  all  the  papers  said 

That  Mr. was  dead  ; 

Why,  then,  what  said  the  city  ? 
The  tenth  part  sadly  shook  their  head, 
And  shaking  sigh'd,  and  sighing  said, 
"Pity,  indeed,  'tis  pity!" 

But  when  the  said  report  was  found 
A  rumour  wholly  without  ground, 
Why,  then,  what  said  the  city  ? 
The  other  nine  parts  shook  their  head. 
Repeating  what  the  tenth  had  said, 
"  Pity,  indeed,  'tis  pity  !" 

1796. 


POEMS. 


47 


TO  A  PRIMROSE, 

(the  first  seen  in  the  season.) 

— nitens,  et  roboris  expers 
Target  et  insolida  est:  at  spe  delectat.  Ovid. 

Thy  smiles  I  note,  sweet  early  flower, 
That  peeping  from  thy  rustic  bower, 
The  festive  news  to  earth  dost  bring, 
A  fragrant  messenger  of  spring  ! 

But  tender  blossom,  why  so  pale  ? 
Dost  hear  stern  winter  in  the  gale  ? 
And  didst  thou  tempt  th'  ungentle  sky 
To  catch  one  vernal  glance  and  die  ? 

Such  the  wan  lustre  sickness  wears. 
When  health's  first  feeble  beam  appears ; 
So  lanscuid  are  the  smiles  that  seek 
To  settle  on  the  care-worn  cheek, 

When  timorous  hope  the  head  uprears, 
Still  drooping  and  still  moist  with  tears, 
If,  through  dispersing  grief,  be  seen 
Of  bliss  the  heavenly  spark  serene. 

1796. 


48  POEMS. 


ON  THE  CIIRIS'l  i:NIN(J  OF  A  FRIEND'S  CHILD. 

This  day  among  the  faithful  placed, 

And  fed  with  fontal  manna, 
O  with  maternal  title  graced 

Dear  Anna's  dearest  Anna  ! — 

While  others  wish  thee  wise  and  fair, 

A  maid  of  spotless  fame, 
I'll  breathe  this  more  compendious  prayer — 

May'st  thou  deserve  thy  name  ! 

Thy  mother's  name — a  potent  spell. 

That  bids  the  virtues  hie 
From  mystic  grove  and  living  cell 

Confess'd  to  fancy's  eye ; — 

Meek  quietness  without  offence ; 

Content  in  homespun  kirtle  ; 
True  love ;  and  true  love's  innocence. 

White  blossom  of  the  myrtle  ! 

Associates  of  thy  name,  sweet  child  ! 

These  virtues  may'st  thou  win  ; 
With  face  as  eloquently  mild 

To  say,  they  lodge  within. 

So,  when  her  tale  of  days  all  flown. 

Thy  mother  shall  be  mist  here ; 
When  Heaven  at  length  shall  claim  its  own, 

And  angels  snatch  their  sister ; 


POEMS.  49 

Some  hoary-headed  friend,  perchance, 

May  gaze  with  stifled  breath  ; 
And  oft,  in  momentary  trance, 

Foraet  the  waste  of  death. 

Ev'n  thus  a  lovely  rose  T  view'd. 

In  summer-swelling  pride ; 
Nor  mark'd  the  bud,  that  green  and  rude 

Peep'd  at  the  rose's  side. 

It  chanced,  I  pass'd  again  that  way 

In  autumn's  latest  hour, 
And  wond'ring  saw  the  selfsame  spray 

Rich  with  the  selfsame  flower. 

Ah,  fond  deceit !  the  rude  green  bud 

Alike  in  shape,  place,  name. 
Had  bloom'd,  where  bloom 'd  its  parent  stud. 

Another  and  the  same  ! 

1796. 


EPIGRAM. 

Hoarse  Mtevius  reads  his  hobbling  verse 

To  all,  and  at  all  times ; 
And  finds  them  both  divinely  smooth. 

His  voice,  as  well  as  rhymes. 

Yet  folks  say — "  Msevius  is  no  ass :" — 
But  Msevius  makes  it  clear. 

That  he's  a  monster  of  an  ass, 
An  ass  without  an  ear. 

1797. 

VOL.  I.  E 


50  POEMS. 


INSCRIPTION  BY  THE  REV.  W.  L.  BOWLES 

IN  NETHER  STOWEY  CIIUKCH. 

LiETus  abi !  mundi  strepitu  curisque  remotus ; 

Lffitus  abi !  ca-li  qua  vocat  ahna  quics. 
Ipsa  Fides  loquitur,  lacrymamquc  incusat  inancm, 

Quffi  cadit  in  vestros,  care  pater,  cineres. 
Heu !  tantum  liceat  meritos  hos  solvere  ritus, 

Et  longum  tremula  dicere  voce,  Vale  ! 


TRANSLATION. 


Depart  in  joy  from  this  world's  noise  and  strife 
To  the  deep  quiet  of  celestial  life  ! 
Depart ! — Affection's  self  reproves  the  tear 
Which  falls,  O  honour'd  Parent!  on  thy  bier; — 
Yet  Nature  will  be  heard,  the  heart  will  swell. 
And  the  voice  tremble  with  a  last  Farewell ! 


INTRODUCTION  TO  THE  TALE  OF  THE 
DARK  LADIE. 

The  following  poem  is  intended  as  the  introduction  to 
a  somewhat  lono-er  one.  The  use  of  the  old  ballad 
word  Ladie  for  Lady,  is  the  only  piece  of  obsolete- 
ness in  it;  and  as  it  is  professedly  a  tale  of  ancient 


POEMS.  51 

times,  I  trust  that  the  affectionate  lovers  of  venerable 
antiquity,  as  Camden  says,  will  grant  me  their  par- 
don, and  perhaps  may  be  induced  to  admit  a  force 
and  propriety  in  it.  A  heavier  objection  may  be 
adduced  against  the  author,  tliat  in  these  times  of 
fear  and  expectation,  when  novelties  explode  around 
us  in  all  directions,  he  should  presume  to  offer  to 
the  public  a  silly  tale  of  old-fashioned  love ;  and 
five  years  ago,  I  own  I  should  have  allowed  and  felt 
the  force  of  this  objection.  But  alas  !  explosion  has 
succeeded  explosion  so  rapidly,  that  novelty  itself 
ceases  to  appear  new ;  and  it  is  possible  that  now, 
even  a  simple  story,  wholly  uninspired  with  politics 
or  personality,  may  find  some  attention  amid  the 
hubbub  of  revolutions,  as  to  those  who  have  re- 
mained a  long  time  by  the  falls  of  Niagara,  the 
lowest  whispering  becomes  distinctly  audible. 

1799. 

O  LEAVE  the  lily  on  its  stem  ; 

O  leave  the  rose  upon  the  spray ; 
O  leave  the  elder-bloom,  fair  maids  ! 

And  listen  to  my  lay. 

A  cypress  and  a  myrtle-bough 

This  morn  around  my  harp  you  twin'd, 

Because  it  fashion'd  mournfully 
Its  murmurs  in  the  wind. 

And  now  a  tale  of  love  and  woe, 

A  woful  tale  of  love  I  sing ; 
Hark,  gentle  maidens,  hark  !  it  sighs 

And  trembles  on  the  string. 


But  most,  my  own  dear  Genevieve, 
It  sighs  and  trembles  most  for  thee 


POEMS. 

0  come  and  hear  the  cruel  wrongs 
Befell  the  Dark  Ladie  !  * 

*  a:  *  *  * 

And  now  once  more  a  tale  of  woe, 

A  woful  tale  of  love  I  sing ; 
For  thee,  my  Genevieve  !  it  sighs, 

And  trembles  on  the  string. 

When  last  I  sang  the  cruel  scorn 

That  craz'd  this  bold  and  lovely  knight, 

And  how  he  roani'd  the  mountain-woods. 
Nor  rested  day  or  night ; 

1  promised  thee  a  sister  tale 
Of  man's  perfidious  cruelty ; 

Come,  then,  and  hear  what  cruel  wrong 
Befell  the  Dark  Ladie. 


EPILOGUE  TO  THE  RASH  CONJUROR. 

AN  UNCOMPOSED  POEM. 

We  ask  and  urge — (here  ends  the  story !) 
All  Christian  Papishes  to  pray 
That  this  unhappy  Conjuror  may, 
Instead  of  Hell,  be  but  in  Purgatory, — 

For  then  there's  hope; — 

Long  live  the  Pope  ! 

1805. 

*  Here  followed  the  stanzas,  afterwards  published  separately  under 
the  title  "  Love."  (Poet.  Works,  vol.  i.  p.  145.  Pickering,  1834.) 
and  after  them  came  the  other  three  stanzas  printed  above ;  the  whole 
forming  the  introduction  to  the  intended  Dark  Ladie,  of  which  all  that 
exists  is  to  be  found  ibid.  p.  150.     Ed. 


POEMS.  53 


PSYCHE. 

Th  e  butterfly  the  ancient  Grecians  made 
The  soul's  fair  emblem,  and  its  only  name — 
But  of  the  soul,  escap'd  the  slavish  trade 
Of  mortal  life  ! — For  in  this  earthly  frame 
Ours  is  the  reptile's  lot,  much  toil,  much  blame, 
Manifold  motions  making  little  speed. 
And  to  deform  and  kill  the  things  whereon  we  feed. 

1808. 


COMPLAINT. 


How  seldom.  Friend  !  a  good  great  man  inherits 
Honour  or  wealth,  with  all  his  worth  and  pains  ! 
It  sounds  like  stories  from  the  land  of  spirits, 
If  any  man  obtain  that  which  he  merits. 
Or  any  merit  that  which  he  obtains. 


REPROOF. 


For  shame,  dear  Friend  !   renounce  this  canting  strain  ! 

What  would'st  thou  have  a  good  great  man  obtain  ? 

Place — titles — salary — a  gilded  chain — 

Or  throne  of  corses  which  his  sword  hath  slain? — 

Greatness  and  goodness  are  not  means,  but  ends  ! 

Hath  he  not  always  treasures,  always  friends, 

The  good  great  man  ? — three  treasures,  love  and  light. 

And  calm  thoughts,  regular  as  infants'  breath  ; — 

And  three  firm  friends,  more  sure  than  day  and  night — 

Himself,  his  Maker,  and  the  angel  Death. 

1809. 


54  POEMS. 


AN  ODE  TO  THE  RAIN. 

COMPOSED  BEFORE  DAY-LIGHT,  ON  THE  MORNING  APPOINTED 

FOR  THE  DEPARTURE  OF  A  VERY  WORTHY, 

BUT  NOT  VERY  PLEASANT  VISITOR,  WHOM  IT  WAS  FEARED 

THE  RAIN  MIGHT  DETAIN. 

I  KNOW  it  is  dark;  and  though  I  have  lain 
Awake,  as  I  guess,  an  hour  or  twain, 
I  have  not  once  open'd  the  hds  of  my  eyes, 
But  I  he  in  the  dark,  as  a  bhnd  man  lies. 

0  Rain  !  that  I  lie  listening  to, 
You're  but  a  doleful  sound  at  best : 

1  owe  you  little  thanks,  'tis  true, 

For  breaking  thus  my  needful  rest ! 
Yet  if,  as  soon  as  it  is  light, 
O  Rain !  you  will  but  take  your  flight, 
I'll  neither  rail,  nor  malice  keep. 
Though  sick  and  sore  for  want  of  sleep. 

But  only  now,  for  this  one  day. 

Do  go,  dear  Rain !  do  go  away ! 

O  Rain !  with  your  dull  two-fold  sound, 

The  clash  hard  by,  and  the  murmur  all  round  ! 

You  know,  if  you  know  aught,  that  we. 

Both  night  and  day,  but  ill  agree : 

For  days,  and  months,  and  almost  years. 

Have  limped  on  through  this  vale  of  tears. 

Since  body  of  mine,  and  rainy  weather. 

Have  lived  on  easy  terms  together. 

Yet  if,  as  soon  as  it  is  light, 

O  Rain  !  you  will  but  take  your  flight. 

Though  you  should  come  again  to-morrow. 

And  bring  with  you  botli  pain  and  sorrow; 


POEMS.  55 

Though  stomach  should  sicken,  and  knees  should  swell— 
I'll  nothing  speak  of  you  but  well. 
But  only  now  for  this  one  day, 
Do  go,  dear  Rain  !  do  go  away  ! 

Dear  Rain  !  I  ne'er  refused  to  say 
You're  a  good  creature  in  your  way. 
Nay,  I  could  write  a  book  myself. 
Would  fit  a  parson's  lower  shelf, 
Showing,  how  very  good  you  are. — 
What  then?  sometimes  it  must  be  fair  ! 
And  if  sometimes,  why  not  to-day  ? 
Do  go,  dear  Rain  !  do  go  away  ! 

Dear  Rain  !  if  I've  been  cold  and  shy. 

Take  no  offence  !  I'll  tell  you  why. 

A  dear  old  Friend  e'en  now  is  here, 

And  with  him  came  my  sister  dear ; 

After  long  absence  now  first  met. 

Long  months  by  pain  and  grief  beset — 

With  three  dear  friends !  in  truth,  we  groan 

Impatiently  to  be  alone. 

We  three,  you  mark  !  and  not  one  more ! 

The  strong  wish  makes  my  spirit  sore. 

We  have  so  much  to  talk  about. 

So  many  sad  things  to  let  out ; 

So  many  tears  in  our  eye-corners. 

Sitting  like  little  Jacky  Homers — 

In  short,  as  soon  as  it  is  day. 

Do  go,  dear  Rain !  do  go  away. 

And  this  I'll  swear  to  you,  dear  Rain  ! 
Whenever  you  shall  come  again, 
Be  you  as  dull  as  e'er  you  could ; 
(And  by  the  bye  'tis  understood. 
You're  not  so  pleasant,  as  you're  good  ;) 


56  POEMS. 

Yet,  knowing  well  your  worth  and  place, 

I'll  welcome  you  with  cheerful  face ; 

And  though  you  stay'd  a  week  or  more, 

Were  ten  times  duller  than  before ; 

Yet  with  kind  heart,  and  right  good  will, 

I'll  sit  and  listen  to  you  still  ; 

Nor  should  you  go  away,  dear  Rain  ! 

Uninvited  to  remain. 

15 ut  only  now,  for  this  one  day. 

Do  go,  dear  Rain  !  do  go  away.  1H09. 


TRANSLATION 

OF  A  PASSAGE  IN  OTTFRIEd's  METRICAL  PARAPHRASE 
OF  THE  GOSPELS. 

"This  Paraphrase,  written  about  the  time  of  Charle- 
magne, is  by  no  means  deficient  in  occasional  pas- 
sages of  considerable  poetic  merit.  There  is  a  flow, 
and  a  tender  enthusiasm  in  the  following  lines  (at 
the  conclusion  of  Chapter  V.),  which  even  in  the 
translation  will  not,  I  flatter  myself,  fail  to  interest 
the  reader.  Ottfried  is  describing  the  circumstances 
immediately  following  the  birth  of  our  Lord." — 
Biog.  Lit,  vol.  i.  p.  203. 

She  gave  with  joy  her  virgin  breast; 

She  hid  it  not,  she  bared  the  breast. 

Which  suckled  that  divinest  babe  ! 

Blessed,  blessed  were  the  breasts 

Which  the  Saviour  infant  kiss'd  ; 

And  blessed,  blessed  was  the  mother 

Who  wrapp'd  his  limbs  in  swaddling  clothes, 

Singing  placed  him  on  her  lap. 

Hung  o'er  him  with  her  looks  of  love, 

And  soothed  him  with  ik  lulling  motion. 


POEMS. 


57 


Blessed  !  for  she  shelter'd  him 

From  the  damp  and  chiUing  air ; — 

Blessed,  blessed  !  for  she  lay 

With  such  a  babe  in  one  blest  bed, 

Close  as  babes  and  mothers  lie  ! 

Blessed,  blessed  evermore, 

With  her  virgin  lips  she  kiss'd. 

With  her  arms,  and  to  her  breast, 

She  embraced  the  babe  divine, 

Her  babe  divine  the  virgin  mother ! 

There  lives  not  on  this  ring  of  earth 

A  mortal  that  can  sing  her  praise. 

Mighty  mother,  virgin  pure. 

In  the  darkness  and  the  night 

For  us  she  bore  the  heavenly  Lord.  1810. 

Most  interesting:  is  it  to  consider  the  effect,  when  the 
feelings  are  wrought  above  the  natural  pitch  by  the 
belief  of  something  mysterious,  while  all  the  images 
are  purely  natural :  then  it  is  that  religion  and  poetry 
strike  deepest." — Biog.  Lit.  vol.  i.  p.  204. 


ISRAEL'S  LAMENT 

ON  THE  DEATH  OF  THE  PRINCESS  CHARLOTTE  OF  WALES. 
FROM  THE  HEBREW  OF  HYMAN  HURWITZ. 

Mourn,  Israel !  Sons  of  Israel,  mourn  ! 

Give  utterance  to  the  inward  throe. 
As  wails  of  her  first  love  forlorn 

The  virgin  clad  in  robes  of  woe  ! 

Mourn  the  young  mother  snatch'd  away 
From  light  and  life's  ascending  sun  ! 

Mourn  for  the  babe,  death's  voiceless  prey, 
Earn'd  by  long  pangs,  and  lost  ere  won ! 


58  POEMS. 

Mourn  the  bright  rose  that  blooin'd  and  went, 
Ere  half  disclosed  its  vernal  hue ! 

Mourn  the  green  bud,  so  rudely  rent. 
It  brake  the  stem  on  which  it  grew  ! 

Mourn  for  the  universal  woe, 

With  solemn  dirge  and  fait' ring  tongue; 
For  England's  Lady  is  laid  low. 

So  dear,  so  lovely,  and  so  young ! 

The  blossoms  on  her  tree  of  life 

Shone  with  the  dews  of  recent  bliss ; — 

Translated  in  that  deadly  strife 
She  plucks  its  fruit  in  Paradise. 

Mourn  for  the  prince,  who  rose  at  morn 
To  seek  and  bless  the  firstling  bud 

Of  his  own  rose,  and  fovuid  the  thorn, 
Its  point  bedew'd  with  tears  of  blood. 

Mourn  for  Britannia's  hopes  decay'd ; — 
Her  daughters  wail  their  dear  defence. 

Their  fair  example,  prostrate  laid, 
Chaste  love,  and  fervid  innocence  ! 

O  Thou  !  who  mark'st  the  monarch's  path, 

To  sad  Jeshurun's  sons  attend  ! 
Amid  the  lightnings  of  thy  wrath 

The  showers  of  consolation  send  ! 

Jehovah  frowns  ! — The  Islands  bow. 
And  prince  and  people  kiss  the  rod  ! 

Their  dread  chastising  judge  wert  Thou — 
Be  Thou  their  comforter,  O  God ! 

1817. 


POEMS.  50 


SENTIMENTAL. 

The  rose  that  blushes  hke  the  mora 

Bedecks  the  valleys  low ; 
And  so  dost  thou,  sweet  infant  corn, 

My  Angelina's  toe. 

But  on  the  rose  there  grows  a  thorn 

That  breeds  disastrous  woe ; 
And  so  dost  thou,  remorseless  corn, 

On  Angelina's  toe.  1825, 


THE  ALTERNATIVE. 

This  way  or  that,  ye  Powers  above  me ! 

I  of  my  grief  were  rid — 
Did  Enna  either  really  love  me, 

Or  cease  to  think  she  did.  1826. 


THE  EXCHANGE. 

We  pledged  our  hearts,  my  love  and  I, — 
I  in  my  arms  the  maiden  clasping ; 

I  could  not  tell  the  reason  why, 
But,  oh  !  I  trembled  like  an  aspen. 

Her  father's  love  she  bade  me  gain ; 

I  went,  and  shook  like  any  reed  ! 
I  strove  to  act  the  man — in  vain  ! 

We  had  exchanged  our  hearts  indeed. 

1826. 


00  I'OEMS. 


WHAT  IS  LIFE? 

Resembles  life  what  once  was  deem'd  of  liaht. 
Too  ample  in  itself  for  human  sight? 
An  absolute  self — an  element  ungrounded — 
All  that  we  see,  all  colours  of  all  shade 
By  encroach  of  darkness  made  ? — 
Is  very  life  by  consciousness  unbounded  ? 
And  all  the  thoughts,  pains,  joys  of  mortal  breath, 
A  war-embrace  of  wrestling  life  and  death  ? 

1829. 


INSCRIPTION  FOR  A  TIME-PIECE. 

Now  !  It  is  gone. — Our  brief  hours  travel  post, 
Each  with  its  thought  or  deed,  its  Why  or  How : — 
But  know,  each  parting  hour  gives  up  a  ghost 
To  dwell  within  thee — an  eternal  Now  ! 

1830. 


EniTA^ION  ATTOrPAnTON. 

Qu^  linquam,  aut  nihil,  aut  nihili,  aut  vix  sunt  mea; — 
Do  Morti ; — reddo  csetera,  Christe !  tibi.  [sordes 


A  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 


PROSPECTUS. 

There  are  few  families,  at  present,  in  the 
higher  and  middle  classes  of  English  society, 
in  which  literary  topics  and  the  productions  of 
the  Fine  Arts,  in  some  one  or  other  of  their 
various  forms,  do  not  occasionally  take  their 
turn  in  contributing  to  the  entertainment  of 
the  social  board,  and  the  amusement  of  the 
circle  at  the  fire  side.  The  acquisitions  and 
attainments  of  the  intellect  ought,  indeed,  to 
hold  a  very  inferior  rank  in  our  estimation, 
opposed  to  moral  worth,  or  even  to  professional 
and  specific  skill,  prudence,  and  industry. 
But  why  should  they  be  opposed,  when  they 
may  be  made  subservient  merely  by  being 
subordinated?  It  can  rarely  happen,  that  a 
man  of  social  disposition,  altogether  a  stranger 
to  subjects  of  taste,  (almost  the  only  ones  on 
which  persons  of  both  sexes  can  converse  with 
a  common  interest)  should  pass  through  the 
world  without  at  times  feeling  dissatisfied  with 
himself.     The  best  proof  of  this  is  to  be  found 


62  PROSPECTUS  OF  A 

ill  the  marked  anxiety  which  men,  wlio  have 
succeeded  in  life  without  the  aid  of  these  ac- 
compHshments,  shew  in  securing  them  to  their 
children.  A  young  man  of  ingenuous  mind 
will  not  wilfully  deprive  himself  of  any  species 
of  respect.  He  will  wish  to  feel  himself  on  a 
level  with  the  average  of  the  society  in  which 
he  lives,  though  he  may  be  ambitious  of  dis- 
tinguishing himself  only  in  his  own  immediate 
pursuit  or  occupation. 

Under  this  conviction,  the  following  Course 
of  Lectures  was  planned.  The  several  titles 
will  best  explain  the  particular  subjects  and 
purposes  of  each :  but  the  main  objects  j^ro- 
posed,  as  the  result  of  all,  are  the  two  following. 

1 .  To  convey,  in  a  form  best  fitted  to  render 
them  impressive  at  the  time,  and  remembered 
afterwards,  rules  and  principles  of  sound  judg- 
ment, with  a  kind  and  degree  of  connected  in- 
formation, such  as  the  hearers  cannot  generally 
be  supposed  likely  to  form,  collect,  and  arrange 
for  themselves,  by  their  own  unassisted  studies. 
It  might  be  presumption  to  say,  that  any  im- 
portant part  of  these  Lectures  could  not  be  de- 
rived from  books  ;  but  none,  I  trust,  in  suppos- 
ing, that  the  same  information  could  not  be 
so  surely  or  conveniently  acquired  from  such 
books  as  are  of  commonest  occurrence,  or  with 
that  quantity  of  time  and  attention  which  can 
be  reasonably  expected,  or  even  wisely  desired, 
of  men  engaged  in  business  and  the  active 
duties  of  the  world. 


COURSE  OF  LECTURES.  63 

2.  Under  a  strong  persuasion  that  little  of 
real  value  is  derived  by  persons  in  general 
from  a  wide  and  various  reading ;  but  still 
more  deeply  convinced  as  to  the  actual  mischief 
of  unconnected  and  promiscuous  reading,  and 
that  it  is  sure,  in  a  greater  or  less  degree,  to 
enervate  even  where  it  does  not  likewise  in- 
flate; I  hope  to  satisfy  many  an  ingenuous 
mind,  seriously  interested  in  its  own  develop- 
ment and  cultivation,  how  moderate  a  number 
of  volumes,  if  only  they  be  judiciously  chosen, 
will  suffice  for  the  attainment  of  every  wise  and 
desirable  purpose  ;  that  is,  in  addition  to  those 
which  he  studies  for  specific  and  professional 
purposes.  It  is  saying  less  than  the  truth  to 
affirm,  that  an  excellent  book  (and  the  remark 
holds  almost  equally  good  of  a  Raphael  as  of 
a  Milton)  is  like  a  well  chosen  and  well  tended 
fruit  tree.  Its  fruits  are  not  of  one  season 
only.  AVith  the  due  and  natural  intervals,  we 
may  recur  to  it  year  after  year,  and  it  will 
supply  the  same  nourishment  and  the  same 
gratification,  if  only  we  ourselves  return  to  it 
with  the  same  healthful  appetite. 

The  subjects  of  the  Lectures  are  indeed  very 
different,  but  not  (in  the  strict  sense  of  the 
term)  diverse ;  they  are  various,  rather  than 
miscellaneous.  There  is  this  bond  of  con- 
nexion common  to  them  all, — that  the  mental 
pleasure  which  they  are  calculated  to  excite  is 
not  dependent  on  accidents  of  fashion,  place, 
or  age,  or  the  events  or  the  customs  of  the  day  ; 


04  PROSPECTUS  OF  A 

but  commensurate  with  the  good  sense,  taste, 
and  feeling,  to  the  cultivation  of  which  they 
themselves  so  largely  contribute,  as  being  all 
in  kind,  though  not  all  in  the  same  degree,  pro- 
ductions of  genius. 

What  it  would  be  arrogant  to  promise,  I  may 
yet  be  permitted  to  hope, — that  the  execution 
will  prove  correspondent  and  adequate  to  the 
plan.  Assuredly,  my  best  efforts  have  not 
been  wanting  so  to  select  and  prepare  the  ma- 
terials, that,  at  the  conclusion  of  the  Lectures, 
an  attentive  auditor,  who  should  consent  to 
aid  his  future  recollection  by  a  few  notes  taken 
either  during  each  Lecture  or  soon  after,  would 
rarely  feel  himself,  for  the  time  to  come,  ex- 
cluded, from  taking  an  intelligent  interest  in 
any  general  conversation  likely  to  occur  in 
mixed  society. 


Syllahvs  of  the  Course. 

I.  January  27,  1818.- — On  the  manners, 
morals,  literature,  philosophy,  religion,  and 
the  state  of  society  in  general,  in  Euroj^ean 
Christendom,  from  the  eighth  to  the  fifteenth 
century,  (that  is  from  A.D.  700,  to  A.D.  1400), 
more  particularly  in  reference  to  England, 
France,  Italy  and  Germany ;  in  other  words, 
a  portrait  of  the  so  called  dark  ages  of  Eu- 
rope. 

n.  January  30. — On  the  tales  and  metrical 


COURSE  OF  LECTURES.  65 

romances  common,  for  the  most  part,  to  En- 
gland, Germany,  and  the  north  of  France, 
and  on  the  English  songs  and  ballads,  con- 
tinued to  the  reign  of  Charles  I.  A  few 
selections  will  be  made  from  the  Swedish, 
Danish,  and  German  languages,  translated 
for  the  purpose  by  the  Lecturer. 

III.  February  3.— Chaucer  and  Spenser; 
of  Petrarch  ;  of  Ariosto,  Pulci,  and  Boiardo. 

IV.  V.  VI.  February  6,  10,  13.— On  the 
dramatic  works  of  Shakspeare.  In  these 
Lectures  will  be  comprised  the  substance  of 
Mr.  Coleridge's  former  courses  on  the  same 
subject,  enlarged  and  varied  by  subsequent 
study  and  reflection. 

VII.  February  17.— On  Ben  Jonson,  Beau- 
mont and  Fletcher,  and  Massinger ;  with  the 
probable  causes  of  the  cessation  of  dramatic 
poetry  in  England  with  Shirley  and  Otway, 
soon  after  the  restoration  of  Charles  II. 

VIII.  February  20.— Of  the  life  and  all 
the  works  of  Cervantes,  but  chiefly  of  his 
Don  Quixote.  The  ridicule  of  knight  er- 
rantry shewn  to  have  been  but  a  secondary 
object  in  the  mind  of  the  author,  and  not  the 
principal  cause  of  the  delight  which  the 
work  continues  to  give  to  all  nations,  and 
imder  all  the  revolutions  of  manners  and 
opinions. 

IX.  February  24. — On  Rabelais,  Swift,  and 
Sterne :  on  the  nature  and  constituents  of 
genuine  Humour,   and  on  the  distinctions  of 

VOL.  I.  F 


GO  PROSPECTUS  OF  A 

the  Humorous  from  the  Witty,  the  Fauci fnl, 
the  Droll,  aud  the  Odd. 

X.  February  27. — Of  Donne,  Dante,  and 
Milton. 

XI.  March  3.— On  the  Arabian  Nights'  En- 
tertainments, and  on  the  romantic  use  of  the 
supernatural,  in  poetry,  and  in  works  of  fic- 
tion not  poetical.  On  the  conditions  and 
regulations  under  which  such  books  may  be 
employed  advantageously  in  the  earlier  periods 
of  education. 

XII.  March  6. — On  tales  of  Matches,  ap- 
paritions, &c.  as  distinguished  from  the  magic 
and  magicians  of  Asiatic  origin.  The  pro- 
bable sources  of  the  former,  and  of  the  belief 
in  them  in  certain  ages  and  classes  of  men. 
Criteria  by  which  mistaken  and  exaggerated 
facts  may  be  distinguished  from  absolute  false- 
hood and  imposture.  Lastly,  the  causes  of  the 
terror  and  interest  which  stories  of  ghosts  and 
witches  inspire,  in  early  life  at  least,  whether 
believed  or  not. 

XIII.  March  10. — On  colour,  sound,  and 
form  in  Nature,  as  coiuiected  with  poesy : 
the  word  "  Poesy  "  used  as  the  generic  or  class 
term,  including  poetry,  music,  painting,  sta- 
tuary, and  ideal  architecture,  as  its  species. 
The  reciprocal  relations  of  poetry  and  philo- 
sophy to  each  other ;  and  of  both  to  religion, 
and  the  moral  sense. 

XIV.  March  1.3. — On  the  corruptions  of  the 
English  language  since  the  reign  of  Queen 
Ann,  in  our  style  of  writing   prose.     A  few 


COURSE  OF  LECTURES.  67 

easy  rules  for  the  attainment  of  a  manly,  un- 
affected and  pure  language,  in  our  genuine 
mother  tongue,  whether  for  the  purpose  of 
writing,  oratory,  or  conversation. 


LECTURE  I.* 

GENERAL  CHARACTER  OF  THE  GOTHIC  MIND 
IN  THE  MIDDLE  AGES. 

Mr.  Coleridge  began  by  treating  of  the  races 
of  mankind  as  descended  from  Shem,  Ham, 
and  Japhet,  and  therein  of  the  early  condi- 
tion of  man  in  his  antique  form.  He  then 
dwelt  on  the  pre-eminence  of  the  Greeks  in 
Art  and  Philosophy,  and  noticed  the  suitable- 
ness of  polytheism  to  small  insulated  states,  in 
which  patriotism  acted  as  a  substitute  for  re- 
ligion, in  destroying  or  suspending  self.  Af- 
terwards, in  consequence  of  the  extension  of 
the  Roman  empire,  some  universal  or  common 
spirit  became  necessary  for  the  conservation  of 
the  vast  body,  and  this  common  spirit  was,  in 
fact,  produced  in  Christianity.  The  causes  of 
the  decline  of  the  Roman  empire  were  in 
operation  long  before  the  time  of  the  actual 
overthrow ;  that  overthrow  had  been  foreseen 
by  many  eminent  Romans,  especially  by 
Seneca.     In  fact,  there  was  under  the  empire 

*  From  Mr.  Green's  note  taken  at  the  delivery.     Ed. 


68  COURSE  OF   LKCTURES. 

an  Italian  and  a  German  party  in  Rome,  and 
in  the  end  the  latter  prevailed. 

He  then  proceeded  to  describe  the  generic 
character  of  the  Northern  nations,  and  defined 
it  as  an  independence  of  the  whole  in  the 
freedom  of  the  individual,  noticing  their  res- 
pect for  women,  and  their  consequent  chival- 
rous spirit  in  w  ar ;  and  how  evidently  the 
participation  in  the  general  council  laid  the 
foundation  of  the  representative  form  of  go- 
vernment, the  only  rational  mode  of  preserving 
individual  liberty  in  opposition  to  the  licentious 
democracy  of  the  ancient  republics. 

He  called  our  attention  to  the  peculiarity  of 
their  art,  and  showed  how  it  entirely  depended 
on  a  symbolical  expression  of  the  infinite, — 
which  is  not  vastness,  nor  immensity,  nor  per- 
fection, but  whatever  cannot  be  circumscribed 
within  the  limits  of  actual  sensuous  being. 
In  the  ancient  art,  on  the  contrary,  every 
thing  was  finite  and  material.  Accordingly, 
sculpture  was  not  attempted  by  the  Gothic 
races  till  the  ancient  specimens  were  disco- 
vered, whilst  painting  and  architecture  were 
of  native  growth  amongst  them.  In  the  earli- 
est specimens  of  the  paintings  of  modern  ages, 
as  in  those  of  Giotto  and  his  associates  in  the 
cemetery  at  Pisa,  this  complexity,  variety,  and 
symbolical  character  are  evident,  and  are  more 
fully  developed  in  the  mightier  works  of  Michel 
Angelo  and  Raffael.  The  contemplation  of 
the  works  of  antique  art  excites  a  feeling  of 
elevated  beauty,  and  exalted  notions  of  the 


LECTURE  I.  69 

human  self;  but  the  Gothic  architecture  im- 
presses the  beholder  with  a  sense  of  self- 
annihilation  ;  he  becomes,  as  it  were,  a  part 
of  the  work  contemplated.  An  endless  com- 
plexity and  variety  are  united  into  one  whole, 
the  plan  of  which  is  not  distinct  from  the  exe- 
cution. A  Gothic  cathedral  is  the  petrefaction 
of  our  religion.  The  only  work  of  truly  modern 
sculpture  is  the  Moses  of  Michel  Angelo. 

The  Northern  nations  were  prepared  by  their 
own  previous  religion  for  Christianity;  they, 
for  the  most  part,  received  it  gladly,  and  it 
took  root  as  in  a  native  soil.  The  deference 
to  woman,  characteristic  of  the  Gothic  races, 
combined  itself  with  devotion  in  the  idea  of  the 
Virgin  Mother,  and  gave  rise  to  many  beautiful 
associations. 

Mr.  C.  remarked  how  Gothic  an  instrument 
in  origin  and  character  the  organ  was. 

He  also  enlarged  on  the  influence  of  female 
character  on  our  education, the  first  impressions 
of  our  childhood  being  derived  from  women. 
Amongst  oriental  nations,  he  said,  the  only 
distinction  was  between  lord  and  slave.  With 
the  antique  Greeks,  the  will  of  every  one  con- 
flicting with  the  will  of  all,  produced  licentious- 
ness ;  with  the  modern  descendants  from  the 
northern  stocks,  both  these  extremes  were  shut 
out,  to  reappear  mixed  and  condensed  into  this 
principle  or  temper ; — submission,  but  with 
free  choice, — illustrated  in  chivalrous  devotion 
to  women  as  such,  in  attachment  to  the  sove- 
reign, &c. 


70  COURSE  OF   LKCTURES. 


LECTURE  II.* 

GENERAL  CHARACTER  OF  THE  GOTHIC 
LITERATURE  AND  ART. 

I N  my  last  lecture  I  stated  that  the  descendants 
of  Japhet  and  Shem  peopled  Europe  and  Asia, 
fulfilling  in  their  distribution  the  prophecies  of 
Scripture,  while  the  descendants  of  Ham  passed 
►into  Africa,  there  also  actually  verifying  the 
interdiction  pronounced  against  them.  The 
Keltic  and  Teutonic  nations  occupied  that  part 
of  Europe,  which  is  now  France,  Britain,  Ger- 
many, Sweden,  Denmark,  &c.  They  were  in 
general  a  hardy  race,  possessing  great  fortitude, 
and  capable  of  great  endurance.  The  Romans 
slowly  conquered  the  more  southerly  portion  of 
their  tribes,  and  succeeded  only  by  their  su- 
perior arts,  their  policy,  and  better  discipline. 
After  a  time,  when  the  Goths, — to  use  the  name 
of  the  noblest  and  most  historical  of  the  Teu- 
tonic tribes, — had  acquired  some  knowledge 
of  these  arts  from  mixing  with  their  conquerors, 
they  invaded  the  Roman  territories.  The  hardy 
habits,  the  steady  perseverance,  the  better  faith 
of  the  enduring  Goth  rendered  him  too  for- 
midable an  enemy  for  the  corrupt  Roman,  who 

*  From  Mr.  William  Hammond's  note  taken   at  the  deli- 
very.    Ed. 


LECTURE  II.  71 

was  more  inclined  to  purchase  the  subjection 
of  his  enemy,  than  to  go  through  the  suffering 
necessary  to  secure  it.  The  conquest  of  the 
Romans  gave  to  the  Goths  the  Christian  re- 
ligion as  it  was  then  existing  in  Italy  ;  and  the 
light  and  graceful  building  of  Grecian,  or  Ro- 
man-Greek order, became  singularly  combined 
witli  the  massy  architecture  of  the  Goths,  as 
wild  and  varied  as  the  forest  vegetation  which 
it  resembled.  The  Greek  art  is  beautiful. 
When  I  enter  a  Greek  church,  my  eye  is 
charmed,  and  my  mind  elated ;  I  feel  exalted, 
and  proud  that  I  am  a  man.  But  the  Gothic 
art  is  sublime.  On  entering  a  cathedral,  I  am 
filled  with  devotion  and  with  awe  ;  I  am  lost 
to  the  actualities  that  surround  me,  and  my 
whole  being  expands  into  the  infinite ;  earth 
and  air,  nature  and  art,  all  swell  up  into  eter- 
nity, and  the  only  sensible  impression  left,  is, 
'  that  I  am  nothing !'  This  religion,  while  it 
tended  to  soften  the,  manners  of  the  Northern 
tribes,  was  at  the  same  time  highly  congenial 
to  their  nature.  The  Goths  are  free  from  the 
stain  of  hero  worship.  Gazing  on  their  rugged 
mountains,  surrounded  by  impassable  forests, 
accustomed  to  gloomy  seasons,  they  lived  in 
the  bosom  of  nature,  and  worshipped  an  in- 
visible and  unknown  deity.  Firm  in  his  faith, 
domestic  in  his  habits,  the  life  of  the  Goth  was 
simple  and  dignified,  yet  tender  and  affec- 
tionate. 

The  Greeks  were  remarkabie  for  compla- 


72  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

cency  and  completion  ;  they  delighted  in  what- 
ever pleased  the  eye;  to  them  it  was  not  enough 
to  have  merely  the  idea  of  a  divinity,  they  must 
have  it  placed  before  them,  shaped  in  the  most 
perfect  symmetry,  and  presented  with  the 
nicest]  udgment;  and  if  we  look  upon  any  Greek 
production  of  art,  the  beauty  of  its  parts,  and 
the  harmony  of  their  union,  the  complete  and 
complacent  effect  of  the  whole,  are  the  striking 
characteristics.  It  is  the  same  in  their  poetry. 
In  Homer  you  have  a  poem  perfect  in  its  form, 
whether  originally  so,  or  from  the  labour  of 
after  critics,  I  know  not ;  his  descriptions  are 
pictures  brought  vividly  before  you,  and  as  far 
as  the  eye  and  understanding  are  concerned,  I 
am  indeed  gratified.  But  if  I  wish  my  feelings 
to  be  affected,  if  I  wish  my  heart  to  be  touched, 
if  I  wish  to  melt  into  sentiment  and  tenderness, 
I  must  turn  to  the  heroic  songs  of  the  Goths, 
to  the  poetry  of  the  middle  ages.  The  worship 
of  statues  in  Greece  had,  in  a  civil  sense,  its 
advantage,  and  disadvantage ;  advantage,  in 
promoting  statuary  and  the  arts  ;  disadvantage, 
in  bringing  their  gods  too  much  on  a  level  with 
human  beings,  and  thence  depriving  them  of 
their  dignity,  and  gradually  giving  rise  to  scep- 
ticism and  ridicule.  But  no  statue,  no  artificial 
emblem,  could  satisfy  the  Northman's  mind ; 
the  dark  wild  imagery  of  nature,  which  sur- 
rounded him,  and  the  freedom  of  his  life,  gave 
his  mind  a  tendency  to  the  infinite,  so  that 
he  found  rest  in  that  which  presented  no  end. 


LECTURE  II.  73 

and  derived  satisfaction  from  that  which  was 
indistinct. 

We  have  few  and  uncertain  vestiges  of  Gothic 
Hterature  till  the  time  of  Theodoric,  who  en- 
couraged his  subjects  to  write,  and  who  made 
a  collection  of  their  poems.  These  consisted 
chiefly  of  heroic  songs,  sung  at  the  Court;  for 
at  that  time  this  was  the  custom.  Charlemagne, 
in  the  beginning  of  the  ninth  century,  greatly 
encouraged  letters,  and  made  a  further  collec- 
tion of  the  poems  of  his  time,  among  which 
were  several  epic  poems  of  great  merit ;  or 
rather  in  strictness  there  was  a  vast  cycle  of 
heroic  poems,  or  minstrelsies,  from  and  out  of 
which  separate  poems  were  composed.  The 
form  of  poetry  was,  however,  for  the  most 
part,  the  metrical  romance  and  heroic  tale'. 
Charlemagne's  army,  or  a  large  division  of  it, 
was  utterly  destroyed  in  the  Pyrenees,  when 
returning  from  a  successful  attack  on  the  Arabs 
of  Navarre  and  Arragon;  yet  the  name  of  Ron- 
cesvalles  became  famous  in  the  songs  of  the 
Gothic  poets.  The  Greeks  and  Romans  would 
not  have  done  this ;  they  would  not  have  re- 
corded in  heroic  verse  the  death  and  defeat  of 
their  fellow-countrymen.  But  the  Goths,  firm 
in  their  faith,  with  a  constancy  not  to  be  shaken, 
celebrated  those  brave  men  who  died  for  their 
religion  and  their  country  !  What,  though  they 
had  been  defeated,  they  died  without  fear,  as 
they  had  lived  without  reproach  ;  they  left  no 
stain  on  their  names,  for  they  fell  fighting  for 


74  rOUIiSE  OF  LECTliRES. 

tlieir  God,  their  liberty,  and  their  rights ;  and 
the  song  that  sang  that  day's  reverse  animated 
them  to  future  victory  and  certain  vengeance. 
I  must  now  turn  to  our  great  monarch,  Al- 
fred, one  of  the  most  august  characters  that  any 
age  has  ever  produced ;   and  when  I   picture 
him  after  the  toils  of  government  and  the  dan- 
gers of  battle,  seated  by  a  solitary  lamp,  trans- 
lating the  holy  scriptures  into  the  Saxon  tongue, 
—  when  I  reflect  on  his  moderation  in  success, 
on  his  fortitude  and  perseverance  in  difficidty 
and  defeat,  and  on  the  wisdom  and  extensive 
nature  of  his  legislation,  I  am  really  at  a  loss 
which  part  of  this  great  man's  character  most 
to  admire.     Yet  above  all,  I  see  the  grandeur, 
the  freedom,  the  mildness,  the  domestic  unity, 
the  universal  character  of  the  middle  ages  con- 
densed into  Alfred's  glorious  institution  of  the 
trial  by  jury.     I  gaze  upon  it  as  the  immortal 
symbol  of  that  age ; — an   age  called   indeed 
dark ; — but  how  could  that  age  be  considered 
dark,  which  solved  the  difficult  problem  of  uni- 
versal liberty,  freed  man  from  the  shackles  of 
tyranny,  and  subjected  his  actions  to  the  deci- 
sion of  twelve  of  his  fellow  countrymen  ?  The 
liberty  of  the  Greeks  was  a  phenomenon,  a  me- 
teor, which  blazed  for  a  short  time,  and  then 
sank  into  eternal  darkness.     It  was  a  combi- 
nation of  most  opposite  materials,  slavery  and 
liberty.     Such  can  neither  be  happy  nor  last- 
ing.    The  Goths  on  the  other  hand  said,  You 
shall  be  our  Emperor;  but  we  must  be  Princes 


LECTURE  II.  75 

on  our  own  estates,  and  over  them  you  shall 
have  no  power !  The  Vassals  said  to  their 
Prince,  We  will  serve  yon  in  your  wars,  and 
defend  your  castle ;  but  we  must  have  liberty 
in  our  own  circle,  our  cottage,  our  cattle,  our 
proportion  of  land.  The  Cities  said,  We  ac- 
knowledge you  for  our  Emperor ;  but  we  must 
have  our  walls  and  our  strong  holds,  and  be 
governed  by  our  own  laws.  Thus  all  combined, 
yet  all  were  separate  ;  all  served,  yet  all  were 
free.  Such  a  government  could  not  exist  in  a 
dark  age.  Our  ancestors  may  not  indeed  have 
been  deep  in  the  metaphysics  of  the  schools  ; 
they  may  not  have  shone  in  the  fine  arts  ;  but 
much  knowledge  of  human  nature,  much  prac- 
tical wisdom  must  have  existed  amongst  them, 
when  this  admirable  constitution  was  formed ; 
and  I  believe  it  is  a  decided  truth,  though  cer- 
tainly an  awful  lesson,  that  nations  are  not  the 
most  happy  at  the  time  when  literature  and  the 
arts  flourish  the  most  among  them. 

The  translations  I  had  promised  in  my  syl- 
labus I  shall  defer  to  the  end  of  the  course, 
when  I  shall  give  a  single  lecture  of  recitations 
illustrative  of  the  different  ages  of  poetry. 
There  is  one  Northern  tale  I  will  relate,  as  it 
is  one  from  which  Shakspeare  derived  that 
strongly  marked  and  extraordinary  scene  be- 
tween Richard  III.  and  the  Lady  Anne.  It 
may  not  be  equal  to  that  in  strength  and  ge- 
nius, but  it  is,  undoubtedly,  superior  in  deco- 
rum and  delicacy. 


76  COURSE  OF  LKCTUKliS. 

A  Knight  had  slain  a  Prince,  the  lord  of  a 
strong  castle,  in  combat.  He  afterwards  con- 
trived to  get  into  the  castle,  where  he  obtained 
an  interview  with  the  Princess's  attendant, 
whose  life  he  had  saved  in  some  encounter ; 
he  told  her  of  his  love  for  her  mistress,  and 
won  her  to  his  interest.  She  then  slowly  and 
gradually  worked  on  her  mistress's  mind, 
spoke  of  the  beauty  of  his  person,  the  fire  of 
his  eyes,  the  sweetness  of  his  voice,  his  valour 
in  the  field,  his  gentleness  in  the  court ;  in 
short,  by  watching  her  opportunities,  she  at 
last  filled  the  Princess's  soul  with  this  one 
image ;  she  became  restless ;  sleep  forsook 
her ;  her  curiosity  to  see  this  Knight  became 
strong ;  but  her  maid  still  deferred  the  inter- 
view, till  at  length  she  confessed  she  was  in 
love  with  him  ; — the  Knight  is  then  introduced, 
and  the  nuptials  are  quickly  celebrated. 

In  this  age  there  was  a  tendency  in  writers 
to  the  droll  and  the  grotesque,  and  in  the  little 
dramas  which  at  that  time  existed,  there  were 
singular  instances  of  these.  It  was  the  disease 
of  the  age.  It  is  a  remarkable  fact  that  Luther 
and  Melancthon,  the  great  religious  reformers 
of  that  day,  should  have  strongly  recommended 
for  the  education  of  children,  dramas,  which 
at  present  would  be  considered  highly  indeco- 
rous, if  not  bordering  on  a  deeper  sin.  From 
one  which  they  particularly  recommended,  I 
will  give  a  few  extracts ;  more  I  should  not 
think   it  right  to  do.      The  play  opens  with 


LECTURE  II.  77 

Adam  and  Eve  washing  and  dressing  their 
children  to  appear  before  the  Lord,  who  is  co- 
ming from  heaven  to  hear  them  repeat  the 
Lord's  Prayer,  Belief,  &c.  In  the  next  scene 
the  Lord  appears  seated  like  a  schoolmaster, 
with  the  children  standing  round,  when  Cain, 
who  is  behind  hand,  and  a  sad  pickle,  comes 
running  in  with  a  bloody  nose  and  his  hat  on. 
Adam  says,  "  What,  with  your  hat  on  !"  Cain 
then  goes  up  to  shake  hands  with  the  Almighty, 
when  Adam  says  (giving  him  a  cuff),  "  Ah, 
would  you  give  your  left  hand  to  the  Lord?" 
At  length  Cain  takes  his  place  in  the  class,  and 
it  becomes  his  turn  to  say  the  Lord's  Prayer. 
At  this  time  the  Devil  (a  constant  attendant  at 
that  time)  makes  his  appearance,  and  getting 
behind  Cain,  whispers  in  his  ear ;  instead  of 
the  Lord's  Prayer,  Cain  gives  it  so  changed 
by  the  transposition  of  the  words,  that  the 
meaning  is  reversed;  yet  this  is  so  artfully  done 
by  the  author,  that  it  is  exactly  as  an  obstinate 
child  would  answer,  who  knows  his  lesson,  yet 
does  not  choose  to  say  it.  In  the  last  scene, 
horses  in  rich  trappings  and  carriages  covered 
with  gold  are  introduced,  and  the  good  children 
are  to  ride  in  them  and  be  Lord  Mayors, 
Lords,  &c. ;  Cain  and  the  bad  ones  are  to  be 
made  cobblers  and  tinkers,  and  only  to  associate 
with  such. 

This,  with  numberless  others,  was  written 
by  Hans  Sachs.  Our  simple  ancestors,  firm 
in  their  faith,  and  pure  in  their  morals,  were 


78  COl'RSE  OF  LECTURES. 

only  amused  by  these  pleasantries,  as  they 
seemed  to  them,  and  neither  they  nor  the  re- 
formers feared  their  having  any  influence  hos- 
tile to  religion.  When  I  was  many  years  back 
in  the  north  of  Germany,  there  were  several 
innocent  superstitions  in  practice.  Among 
others  at  Christmas,  presents  used  to  be  given 
to  the  children  by  the  parents,  and  they  were 
delivered  on  Christmas  day  by  a  person  who 
personated,  and  was  supposed  by  the  children 
to  be,  Christ :  early  on  Christmas  morning  he 
called,  knocking  loudly  at  the  door,  and  (hav- 
ing received  his  instructions)  left  presents  for 
the  good  and  a  rod  for  the  bad.  Those  who 
have  since  been  in  Germany  have  found  this 
custom  relinquished ;  it  was  considered  pro- 
fane and  irrational.  Yet  they  have  not  found 
the  children  better,  nor  the  mothers  more 
careful  of  their  offspring  ;  they  have  not  found 
their  devotion  more  fervent,  their  faith  more 
strong,  nor  their  morality  more  pure.* 

*  See  this  custom  of  Kneclit  Rupert  more  minutely  de- 
scribed in  Mr.  Coleridge's  own  letter  from  Germany,  published 
in  the  2nd  vol.  of  the  Friend,  p.  320.     Ed. 


LECTDUR  III.  79 


LECTURE  III. 

THE  TROUBADOURS — BOCCACCIO  —PETRARCH 

PULCI  —  CHAUCER — SPENSER. 

The  last  Lecture  was  allotted  to  an  investi- 
gation into  the  origin  and  character  of  a  species 
of  poetry,  the  least  influenced  of  any  by  the 
literature  of  Greece  and  Rome, — that  in  which 
the  portion  contributed  by  the  Gothic  conque- 
rors, the  predilections  and  general  tone  or 
habit  of  thought  and  feeling,  brought  by  our 
remote  ancestors  with  them  from  the  forests  of 
Germany,  or  the  deep  dells  and  rocky  moun- 
tains of  Norway,  are  the  most  prominent.  In 
the  present  Lecture  I  must  introduce  you  to  a 
species  of  poetry,  which  had  its  birth-place 
near  the  centre  of  Roman  glory,  and  in 
which,  as  might  be  anticipated,  the  influences 
of  the  Greek  and  Roman  muse  are  far  more 
conspicuous, — as  great,  indeed,  as  the  efforts  of 
intentional  imitation  on  the  part  of  the  poets 
themselves  could  render  them.  But  happily 
for  us  and  for  their  own  fame,  the  intention 
of  the  writers  as  men  is  often  at  complete  va- 
riance with  the  genius  of  the  same  men  as 
poets.  To  the  force  of  their  intention  we  owe 
their  mythological  ornaments,  and  the  greater 
definiteness  of  their  imagery  ;   and  their  pas- 


80  COURSE  OF  LECTUKi:S. 

sioii  for  the  beautiful,  the  vohiptuous,  and  the 
artificial,  we  must  in  part  attribute  to  the 
same  intention,  but  in  part  likewise  to  their 
natural  dispositions  and  tastes.  For  the  same 
climate  and  many  of  the  same  circumstances 
were  acting  on  them,  which  had  acted  on  the 
great  classics,  whom  they  were  endeavouring 
to  imitate.  But  the  love  of  the  marvellous,  the 
deeper  sensibility,  the  higher  reverence  for 
womanhood,  the  characteristic  spirit  of  senti- 
ment and  courtesy,^ — these  were  the  heir-looms 
of  nature,  which  still  regained  the  ascendant, 
whenever  the  use  of  the  living  mother-lan- 
guage enabled  the  inspired  poet  to  appear  in- 
stead of  the  toilsome  scholar. 

From  this  same  union,  in  which  the  soul 
(if  I  may  dare  so  express  myself)  was  Gothic, 
while  the  outward  forms  and  a  majority  of  the 
words  themselves,  were  the  reliques  of  the 
Roman,  arose  the  Romance,  or  romantic  lan- 
guage, in  which  the  Troubadours  or  Love- 
singers  of  Provence  sang  and  wrote,  and  the 
different  dialects  of  which  have  been  modified 
into  the  modern  Italian,  Spanish,  and  Portu- 
guese ;  while  the  language  of  the  Trouveurs, 
Trouveres,  or  Norman-French  poets,  forms  the 
intermediate  link  between  the  Romance  or  mo- 
dified Roman,  and  the  Teutonic,  including  the 
Dutch,  Danish,  Swedish,  and  the  upper  and 
lower  German,  as  being  the  modified  Gothic. 
And  as  the  northernmost  extreme  of  the  Nor- 
man-French, or  that  part  of  the  link  in  which 


LECTURE  III.  81 

it  formed  on  the  Teutonic,  we  must  take  the 
Norman-Enghsh  minstrels  and  metrical  ro- 
mances, from  the  greater  predominance  of  the 
Anglo-Saxon  Gothic  in  the  derivation  of  the 
words.  I  mean,  that  the  language  of  the  En- 
glish metrical  romance  is  less  romanized,  and 
has  fewer  words,  not  originally  of  a  northern 
origin,  than  the  same  romances  in  the  Norman - 
French ;  which  is  the  more  striking,  because  the 
former  were  for  the  most  part  translated  from 
the  latter ;  the  authors  of  which  seem  to  have 
eminently  merited  their  name  of  Trouveres,  or 
inventors.  Thus  then  we  have  a  chain  with 
two  rings  or  staples  : — at  the  southern  end  there 
is  the  Roman,  or  Latin  ;  at  the  northern  end 
the  Keltic,  Teutonic,  or  Gothic  ;  and  the  links 
beginning  with  the  southern  end,  are  the  Ro- 
mance, including  the  Provencal,  the  Italian, 
Spanish,  and  Portuguese,  with  their  different 
dialects,  then  the  Norman-French,  and  lastly 
the  English. 

My  object  in  adverting  to  the  Italian  j^oets, 
is  not  so  much  for  their  own  sakes,  in  which 
point  of  view  Dante  and  Ariosto  alone  would 
have  required  separate  Lectures,  but  for  the 
elucidation  of  the  merits  of  our  countrymen,  as 
to  what  extent  we  must  consider  them  as  for- 
tunate imitators  of  their  Italian  predecessors, 
and  in  what  points  they  have  the  higher  claims 
of  original  genius.  Of  Dante,  I  am  to  speak 
elsewhere.  Of  Boccaccio,  who  has  little  inte- 
rest as  a  metrical  poet  in  any  respect,  and  none 

VOL.  I.  G 


f 


82  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

for  my  present  purpose,  except,  perhaps,  as 
the  reputed  inventor  or  introducer  of  the  octave 
stanza  in  his  Teseide,  it  will  be  sufficient  to  say, 
that  we  owe  to  him  the  subjects  of  numerous 
poems  taken  from  his  famous  tales,  the  happy 
art  of  narration,  and  the  still  greater  merit  of 
a  depth  and  fineness  in  the  workings  of  the 
passions,  in  which  last  excellence,  as  likewise 
in  the  wild  and  imaginative  character  of  the 
situations,  his  almost  neglected  romances  ap- 
pear to  me  greatly  to  excel  his  far  famed  De- 
cameron. To  him,  too,  we  owe  the  more  doubt- 
ful merit  of  having  introduced  into  the  Italian 
prose,  and  by  the  authority  of  his  name  and 
the  influence  of  his  example,  more  or  less 
throughout  Europe,  the  long  interwoven  pe- 
riods, and  architectural  structure  which  arose 
from  the  very  nature  of  their  language  in  the 
Greek  writers,  but  which  already  in  the  Latin 
orators  and  historians,  had  betrayed  a  spe- 
cies of  effort,  a  foreign  something,  which  had 
been  superinduced  on  the  language,  instead  of 
growing  out  of  it;  and  which  was  far  too 
alien  from  that  individualizing  and  confedera- 
ting, yet  not  blending,  character  of  the  North, 
to  become  permanent,  although  its  magnifi- 
cence and  stateliness  were  objects  of  admi- 
ration and  occasional  imitation.  This  style 
diminished  the  control  of  the  writer  over  the 
inner  feelings  of  men,  and  created  too  great  a 
charm  between  the  body  and  the  life ;  and 
hence  especially  it  was  abandoned  by  Luther. 


LECTURE  III.  83 

But  lastly,  to  Boccaccio's  sanction  we  must 
trace  a  large  portion  of  the  mythological  pe- 
dantry and  incongruous  paganisms,  which  for 
so  long  a  period  deformed  the  poetry,  even  of 
the  truest  poets.  To  such  an  extravagance 
did  Boccaccio  himself  carry  this  folly,  that  in 
a  romance  of  chivalry,  he  has  uniformly  styled 
God  the  Father  Jupiter,  our  Saviour  Apollo, 
and  the  Evil  Being  Pluto.  But  for  this  there 
might  be  some  excuse  pleaded.  I  dare  make 
none  for  the  gross  and  disgusting  licentiousness, 
the  daring  profaneness,  which  rendered  the  De- 
cameron of  Boccaccio  the  parent  of  a  hundred 
worse  children,  fit  to  be  classed  among  the 
enemies  of  the  human  race ;  which  poisons 
Ariosto-~(for  that  I  may  not  speak  oftener 
than  necessary  of  so  odious  a  subject,  I  men- 
tion it  here  once  for  all) — which  interposes  a 
painful  mixture  in  the  humour  of  Chaucer,  and 
which  has  once  or  twice  seduced  even  our 
pure-minded  Spenser  into  a  grossness,  as  hete- 
rogeneous from  the  spirit  of  his  great  poem, 
as  it  was  alien  to  the  delicacy  of  his  morals. 


Petrarch. 
Born  at  Arezzo,  1304.— Died  1374. 

Petrarch  was  the  final  blossom  and  perfec- 
tion of  the  Troubadours.  See  Biog.  Lit.  vol.  ii, 
p.  27,  &c. 


84  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

NOTES  ON  PETRARCH'S*  SONNETS, 
CANZONES,   &c. 

VOL.  I. 

Good. 
Sonnet.  1.  Voi,  ch'  ascoltate,  &c. 
7.  La  gola,  e  '1  sonno,  &c. 

11.  Se  la  mia  vita,  &c. 

12.  Quando  fra  I'altre,  &c. 
18.  Vergognando  talor,  &c. 

25.  Quanto  piil  m'  avvicino,  &c. 

28.  Solo  e  pensoso,  &c. 

29.  S'  io  credessi,  &c. 
Canz.  14.  S\  e  debile  il  filo,  &c. 

PleasinQ\ 

Ball.  1,  Lassare  il  velo,  &c. 
Canz.  1.  Nel  dolce  tempo,  &c. 

This  poem  was  imitated  by  our  old  Herbert  ;i 
it  is  ridiculous  in  the  thoughts,  but  simple 
and  sweet  in  diction. 

Dignified. 

Canz.  2.  O  aspettata  in  ciel,  &c. 
9.  Gentil  mia  Donna,  &c. 

The  first  half  of  this  ninth  canzone  is  exquisite ; 
and  in  Canzone  8,  the  nine  lines  beginning 

0  poggi,  o  valli,  &c. 

to  cura,  are  expressed  with  vigour  and  chastity. 

*  These  notes,  by  Mr.  C,  are  written  in  a  Petrarch  in  my 
possession,  and  are  of  some  date  before  1812.  It  is  hoped 
that  they  will  not  seem  ill  placed  here.     Ed. 

t  If  George  Herbert  is  meant,  I  can  find  nothing  like  an 
imitation  of  this  canzone  in  his  poems.     Ed. 


LECTURE  III.  85 

Canz.  9.  Daquel  di  innanzi  a  me  medesmo  piacqui, 
Empiendo  d'un  pensier'  alto,  e  soave 
Quel  core,  07id'  hanno  i  begli  occhi  la  chiave. 

Note.  O  that  the  Pope  would  take  these 
eternal  keys,  which  so  for  ever  turn  the  bolts 
on  the  finest  passages  of  true  passion  ! 

VOL.  n. 

Canz.  1.  Che  debb'  io  far?  &c. 

Very  good  ;  but  not  equal,  I  think,  to  Can- 
zone 2, 

Amor,  se  vuoi  ch'  i'  torni,  &c. 

though  less  faulty.  With  the  omission  of  half- 
a-dozen  conceits  and  Petrarchisms  of  hooks, 
baits,  flames,  and  torches,  this  second  canzone 
is  a  bold  and  impassioned  lyric,  and  leaves  no 
doubt  in  my  mind  of  Petrarch's  having  posses- 
sed a  true  poetic  genius.  Utinam  deleri  possint 
secjuentia: — 

L.  17 — 19.   e  la  soave  fiamma 

Ch'  ancor,  lasso !  m'  infiamma 

Essendo  spenta,  or  che  fea  dunque  ardendo  ? 

L.  54 — 56.    ov*  erano  a  tutt'  ore 

Disposti  gli  ami  ov'  io  fui  preso,  e  I'esca 
Ch'  i'  bramo  sempre. 

L.  76 — 79.   onde  V  accese 

Saette  uscivan  d'  invisibil  foco, 

E  ragion  temean  poco  ; 

Che  contra  '1  ciel  non  val  difesa  umana. 

And  the  lines  86,  87. 

Poser'  in  dubbio,  a  cui 

Devesse  il  pregio  di  piu  laude  darsi — 

are  rather  flatly  worded. 


86  COURSE  OF  LECTUUES. 

LuiGI  PULCI. 

Born  at  Florence,  1431. — Died  about  1487. 

Piilci  was  of  one  of  the  noblest  families  in 
Florence,  reported  to  be  one  of  the  Prankish 
stocks  which  remained  in  that  city  after  the 
departure  of  Charlemagne  : — 

Pulcia  Gallorum  soboles  descendit  in  urbem, 
Clara  quidem  bello,  sacris  nee  inhospita  Musis. 

Verino  De  illustrat.   Cort.  Flor.  III.  v.  118. 

Members  of  this  family  were  five  times  elected 
to  the  Priorate,  one  of  the  highest  honours  of 
the  republic.  Pulci  had  two  brothers,  and  one 
of  their  wives,  Antonia,  wlio  were  all  poets  : — 

Carminibus  patriis  notissima  Pulcia  proles; 
Quis  non  banc  urbem  Musarum  dicat  araicam, 
Si  tres  producat  fratres  domus  una  poetas  ? 

lb.  II.  V.  241. 

Luigi  married  Lucrezia  di  Uberto,  of  the  Al- 
bizzi  family,  and  was  intimate  with  the  great 
men  of  his  time,  but  more  especially  with 
Angelo  Politian,  and  Lorenzo  the  Magnificent. 
His  Morgan te  has  been  attributed,  in  ^^art  at 
least,*  to  the  assistance  of  Marsilius  Ficinus, 
and  by  others  the  whole  has  been  attributed  to 
Politian,  The  first  conjecture  is  utterly  im- 
probable ;  the  last  is  possible,  indeed,  on  ac- 
count of  the  licentiousness  of  the  poem  ;   but 

*  Meaning  the  25th  cantu.     Ed. 


LECTURE  III. 


87 


there  are  no  direct  grounds  for  believing  it. 
The  Morgante  Maggiore  is  the  first  proper 
romance;  although,  perhaps,  Pulci  had  the 
Teseide  before  him.  The  story  is  taken  from 
the  fabulous  history  of  Turpin  ;  and  if  the 
author  had  any  distinct  object,  it  seems  to 
have  been  that  of  making  himself  merry  with 
the  absurdities  of  the  old  romancers.  The 
Morgante  sometimes  makes  you  think  of  Ra- 
belais. It  contains  the  most  remarkable  guess 
or  allusion  upon  the  subject  of  America  that 
can  be  found  in  any  book  published  before  the 
discovery.*  The  well  known  passage  in  the 
tragic  Seneca  is  not  to  be  compared  with  it. 
The  copia  verbornm  of  the  mother  Florentine 
tongue,  and  the  easiness  of  his  style,  afterwards 
brought  to  perfection  by  Berni,  are  the  chief 
merits  of  Pulci ;  his  chief  demerit  is  his  heart- 

*  The  reference  is,  of  course,  to  the  following  stanzas: — 

Disse  Astarotte  :  un  error  lungo  e  fioco 

Per  molti  secol  non  ben  conosciuto, 

Fa  che  si  dice  d'  Ercol  le  colonne, 

E  che  pill  la  molti  periti  sonne. 
Sappi  che  questa  opinione  e  vana ; 

Perch^  pill  oltre  navicar  si  puote, 

Pero  che  1'  acqua  in  ogni  parte  e  piana, 

Benche  la  terra  abbi  forma  di  mote  : 

Era  pill  grossa  allor  la  gente  humana; 

Falche  potrebbe  arrosirne  le  gote 

Ercule  ancor  d'  aver  posti  que'  segni, 

Perche  piii  oltre  passeranno  i  legni. 
E  puossi  andar  giii  ne  1'  altro  emisperio, 

Pero  che  al  centro  ogni  cosa  reprime  ; 

Si  che  la  terra  per  divin  niistcrio 


88  COURSE  Ol'  LECTURES. 

less  spirit  of  jest  and  buffoonery,  by  which 
sovereigns  and  their  courtieis  were  flattered 
by  the  degradation  of  nature,  and  the  impoa- 
sihilijication  of  a  pretended  virtue. 


Chaucer. 
Born  in  London,  i;528.— Died  1 400.1 

Chaucer  must  be  read  with  an  eye  to  the 
Norman-French  Trouveres,  of  whom  he  is  the 
best  representative  in  English.  He  had  great 
powers  of  invention.  As  in  Shakspeare,  his 
characters  represent  classes,  but  in  a  different 
manner;  Shakspeare's  characters  are  the  re- 
presentatives of  the  interior  nature  of  huma- 
nity, in  which  some  element  has  become  so 
predominant  as  to  destroy  the  health  of  the 

Sospesa  sta  fra  le  stelle  sublime, 
E  la  giu  son  citta,  castella,  e  imperio; 
Ma  nol  cognobbon  quelle  genti  prime  : 
Vedi  che  il  sol  di  camminar  s'  affretta, 
Dove  io  ti  dico  che  la  giu  s'  aspetta. 
E  come  un  segno  surge  in  Oriente, 
Un  altro  cade  con  mirabil  arte, 
Come  si  vede  qua  ne  1'  Occidente, 
Pero  che  il  ciel  giustamente  comparte ; 
Antipodi  appellata  e  quella  gente  ; 
Adora  il  sole  e  Jupiterre  e  Marte, 
E  piante  e  animal  come  voi  hanno, 
E  spesso  insieme  gran  battaglie  fanno. 

C.  XXV.  St.  228,  &c. 

The  Morgan te  was  printed  in  1488.     Ed. 

t  From  Mr.  Green's  note.     Ed. 


LECTURE  III.  89 

mind  ;  whereas  Chaucer's  are  rather  represen- 
tatives of  classes  of  manners.  He  is  therefore 
more  led  to  individualize  in  a  mere  personal 
sense.  Observe  Chaucer's  love  of  nature ;  and 
how  happily  the  subject  of  his  main  work  is 
chosen.  When  you  reflect  that  the  company 
in  the  Decameron  have  retired  to  a  place  of 
safety  from  the  raging  of  a  pestilence,  their 
mirth  provokes  a  sense  of  their  unfeelingness  ; 
whereas  in  Chaucer  nothing  of  this  sort  occurs, 
and  the  scheme  of  a  party  on  a  pilgrimage, 
with  different  ends  and  occupations,  aptly  al- 
lows of  the  greatest  variety  of  expression  in 
the  tales. 


Spenser. 
Born  in  London,  1553. — Died  1599. 

There  is  this  difference,  among  many  others, 
between  Shakspeare  and  Spenser: — Shaks- 
peare  is  never  coloured  by  the  customs  of  his 
age  ;  what  appears  of  contemporary  character 
in  him  is  merely  negative  ;  it  is  just  not  some- 
thing else.  He  has  none  of  the  fictitious  real- 
ities of  the  classics,  none  of  the  grotesquenesses 
of  chivalry,  none  of  the  allegory  of  the  middle 
ages  ;  there  is  no  sectarianism  either  of  politics 
or  religion,  no  miser,  no  witch, — no  common 
witch, — no  astrology — nothing  impermanent 
of  however  long  duration ;  but  he  stands  like 
the  yew  tree  in  Lorton  vale,  which  has  known 


90  COURSK  OF  LECTURES. 

SO  many  ages  that  it  belongs  to  none  in  par- 
ticular ;  a  living  image  of  endless  self-repro- 
duction, like  the  immortal  tree  of  Malabar. 
In  Spenser  the  spiiit  of  chivalry  is  entirely 
predominant,  although  with  a  much  greater 
infusion  of  the  poet's  own  individual  self  into 
it  than  is  found  in  any  other  writer.  He  has  the 
wit  of  the  southern  with  the  deeper  inwardness 
of  the  northern  genius. 

No  one  can  appreciate  Spenser  without  some 
reflection  on  the  nature  of  allegorical  writing. 
The  mere  etymological  meaning  of  the  word, 
allegory, — to  talk  of  one  thing  and  thereby  con- 
vey another, — is  too  wide.  The  true  sense  is 
this, — the  employment  of  one  set  of  agents  and 
images  to  convey  in  disguise  a  moral  meaning, 
with  a  likeness  to  the  imagination,  but  with  a 
difference  to  the  understanding, — those  agents 
and  images  being  so  combined  as  to  form  a 
homogeneous  whole.  This  distinguishes  it 
from  metaphor,  which  is  part  of  an  allegory. 
But  allegory  is  not  properly  distinguishable 
from  fable,  otherwise  than  as  the  first  includes 
the  second,  as  a  genus  its  species ;  for  in  a 
fable  there  must  be  nothing  but  what  is  uni- 
versally known  and  acknowledged,  but  in  an 
allegory  there  maybe  that  which  is  new  and  not 
previously  admitted.  The  pictures  of  the  great 
masters,  especially  of  the  Italian  schools,  are 
genuine  allegories.  Amongst  the  classics,  the 
multitude  of  their  gods  either  precluded  alle- 
gory altogether,  or  else  made  every  thing  alle- 


LECTURE  III.  91 

gory,  as  in  the  Hesiodic  Theogonia;  for  you 
can  scarcely  distinguish  between  power  and 
the  personification  of  power.  The  Cupid  and 
Psyche  of,  or  found  in,  Apuleius,  is  a  phseno- 
menon.  It  is  the  Platonic  mode  of  accounting 
for  the  fall  of  man.  The  Battle  of  the  Soul*  by 
Prudentius  is  an  early  instance  of  Christian 
allegory. 

Narrative  allegory  is  distinguished  from  my- 
thology as  reality  from  symbol ;  it  is,  in  short, 
the  proper  intermedium  between  person  and 
personification.  Where  it  is  too  strongly  in- 
dividualized, it  ceases  to  be  allegory ;  this  is 
often  felt  in  the  Pilgrim's  Progress,  where  the 
characters  are  real  persons  with  nick  names. 
Perhaps  one  of  the  most  curious  warnings 
against  another  attempt  at  narrative  allegory 
on  a  great  scale,  may  be  found  in  Tasso's 
account  of  what  he  himself  intended  in  and  by 
his  Jerusalem  Delivered. 

As  characteristic  of  Spenser,  I  would  call 
your  particular  attention  in  the  first  place  to  the 
indescribable  sweetness  and  fluent  projection 
of  his  verse,  very  clearly  distinguishable  from 
the  deeper  and  more  inwoven  harmonies  of 
Shakspeare  and  Milton.  This  stanza  is  a 
good  instance  of  what  I  mean  :  — 

Yet  she,  most  faithful!  ladie,  all  this  while 
Forsaken,  wofull,  solitarie  mayd, 
Far  from  all  peoples  preace,  as  in  exile, 
In  wildernesse  and  wastfuU  deserts  strayd 

*  Psychomachia,     Ed. 


92  COUKSK  OF  LECTURES. 

To  seeke  her  knight;   who,  subtily  betrayd 
Through  that  late  vision  which  th'  enchaunter  wrought, 
Had  her  abandond  ;  she,  of  nought  affrayd. 
Through  woods  and  wastnes  wide  him  daily  sought, 
Yet  wished  tydinges  none  of  him  unto  her  brought. 

F.  Qu.  B.  I.  c.  3.  St.  3. 

2.  Combined  with  this  sweetness  and  fluency, 
the  scientific  construction  of  the  metre  of  the 
Faery  Queene  is  very  noticeable.  One  of 
Spenser's  arts  is  that  of  alUteration,  and  he 
uses  it  with  great  effect  in  doubling  the  im- 
pression of  an  image  : — 

In  wildernesse  and  wastful  deserts, — 

Through  woods  and  ?/;astnes  wilde, — 

They  passe  the  bitter  waves  of  Acheron, 

Where  many  soules  sit  wailing  woefully, 

And  come  to^ery^ood  of  PAlegeton, 

Whereas  the  damned  ghosts  in  torments  fry. 

And  with  sharp  shrilling  shrieks  doth  bootlesse  cry, — &c. 

He  is  particularly  given  to  an  alternate  allite- 
ration, which  is,  perhaps,  when  well  used,  a 
great  secret  in  melody  : — 

A  ramping  lyon  rushed  suddenly, — 

And  sad  to  see  her  sorrowful  constraint, — 

And  on  the  grasse  her  ofaintie  Zimbes  did  /ay, — &c. 

You  cannot  read  a  page  of  the  Faery  Queene, 
if  you  read  for  that  purpose,  without  perceiv- 
ing the  intentional  alliterativeness  of  the  words ; 
and  yet  so  skilfully  is  this  managed,  that  it 
never  strikes  any  unwarned  ear  as  artificial, 
or  other  than  the  result  of  the  necessary  move- 
ment of  the  verse. 


LECTUKE  III.  93 

3.  Spenser  displays  great  skill  in  harmo- 
nizing his  descriptions  of  external  nature  and 
actual  incidents  with  the  allegorical  character 
and  epic  activity  of  the  poem.  Take  these  two 
beautiful  passages  as  illustrations  of  what  I 
mean : — 

By  this  the  northerne  wagoner  had  set 

His  sevenfol  teme  behind  the  stedfast  starre 

That  was  in  ocean  waves  yet  never  wet, 

But  firrae  is  fixt,  and  sendeth  light  from  farre 

To  all  that  in  the  wide  deepe  wandring  arre ; 

And  chearefuU  chaunticlere  with  his  note  shrill 

Had  warned  once,  that  Phoebus'  fiery  carre 

In  hast  was  climbing  up  the  easterne  hill, 

Full  envious  that  Night  so  long  his  roome  did  fill ; 

Whe7i  those  accursed  messengers  of  hell, 

That  feigning  dreame,  and  that  faire-forged  spright 

Came,  &c,     B,  I.  c.  2.  st.  1. 

*  *  * 

At  last,  the  golden  orientall  gate 
Of  greatest  Heaven  gan  to  open  fayre  ; 
And  Phoebus,  fresh  as  brydegrome  to  his  mate, 
Came  dauncing  forth,  shaking  his  deawie  hayre  ; 
And  hurld  his  glistring  beams  through  gloomy  ayre. 
Which  when  the  wakeful  Elfe  perceiv'd,  streightway 
He  started  up,  and  did  him  selfe  prepayre 
In  sunbright  armes  and  battailons  array  ; 
For  with  that  Pagan  proud  he  combat  will  that  day. 

lb.  c.  5.  St.  2. 

Observe  also  the  exceeding  vividness  of 
Spenser's  descriptions.  They  are  not,  in  the 
true  sense  of  the  word,  picturesque ;  but  are 
composed  of  a  wondrous  series  of  images,  as  in 
our  dreams.     Compare  the  following  passage 


94  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

with  any  thing  you  may  remember  in  pari 
materia  in  IMiUon  or  Shakspeare  : — 

His  liaughtie  helmet,  horrid  all  with  gold, 

Both  glorious  brightnesse  and  great  terrour  bredd 

For  all  the  crest  a  dragon  did  enfold 

With  greedie  pawes,  and  over  all  did  spredd 

His  golden  winges ;   his  dreadfuU  hideous  hcdd, 

Close  couched  on  the  bever,  sccmd  to  throw 

From  flaming  mouth  bright  sparkles  fiery  redd, 

That  suddeine  horrour  to  faint  hartes  did  show  ; 

And  scaly  tayle  was  stretcht  adowne  his  back  full  low. 

Upon  the  top  of  all  his  loftie  crest 

A  bounch  of  haires  discolourd  diversly. 

With  sprinkled  pearle  and  gold  full  richly  drest, 

Did  shake,  and  seemd  to  daunce  for  jollitie  ; 

Like  to  an  almond  tree  ymounted  hye 

On  top  of  greene  Selinis  all  alone, 

With  blossoms  brave  bedecked  daintily, 

Whose  tender  locks  do  tremble  every  one 

At  everie  little  breath  that  under  heaven  is  blowne. 

lb.  c.  7.  St.  31-2. 

4.  You  will  take  especial  note  of  the  marvel- 
lous independence  and  true  imaginative  ab- 
sence of  all  particular  space  or  time  in  the 
Faery  Queene.  It  is  in  the  domains  neither 
of  history  or  geography  ;  it  is  ignorant  of  all 
artificial  boundary,  all  material  obstacles  ;  it  is 
truly  in  land  of  Faery,  that  is,  of  mental  space. 
The  poet  has  placed  you  in  a  dream,  a  charm- 
ed sleep,  and  you  neither  wish,  nor  have  the 
power,  to  inquire  where  you  are,  or  how  you 
got  there.  It  reminds  me  of  some  lines  of  my 
own : — 


LECTURE  III.  95 

Oh  !  would  to  Alia  ! 
The  raven  or  the  sea-mew  were  appointed 
To  bring  me  food ! — or  rather  that  my  soul 
Might  draw  in  life  from  the  universal  air! 
It  were  a  lot  divine  in  some  small  skifF 
Along  some  ocean's  boundless  solitude 
To  float  for  ever  with  a  careless  course 
And  think  myself  the  only  being  alive  ! 

Remorse,  Act  iv.  sc.  3. 

Indeed  Spenser  himself,  in  the  conduct  of  his 
great  poem,  may  be  represented  under  the 
same  image,  his  symbolizing  purpose  being  his 
mariner's  compass : — 

As  pilot  well  expert  in  perilous  wave, 
That  to  a  stedfast  starre  his  course  hath  bent, 
When  foggy  mistes  or  cloudy  tempests  have 
The  faithfull  light  of  that  faire  lampe  yblent, 
And  coverd  Heaven  with  hideous  dreriment ; 
Upon  his  card  and  compas  tirmes  his  eye, 
The  maysters  of  his  long  experiment, 
And  to  them  does  the  steddy  helme  apply, 
Bidding  his  winged  vessell  fairely  forward  fly. 

B.  II.  c.  7.  St.  I. 

So  the  poet  through  the  realms  of  allegory. 

5.  You  should  note  the  quintessential  cha- 
racter of  Christian  chivalry  in  all  his  cha- 
racters, but  more  especially  in  his  women. 
The  Greeks,  except,  perhaps,  in  Homer,  seem 
to  have  had  no  way  of  making  their  women 
interesting,  but  by  unsexing  them,  as  in  the 
instances  of  the  tragic  Medea,  Electra,  &c. 
Contrast  such  characters  with  Spenser's  Una, 
who  exhibits  no  prominent  feature,  has  nopar- 
ticularization,  but  produces  the  same  feeling 


9G  COURSK  OF   LECTURKS. 

that  a  statue   does,  when  contemplated  at  a 
distance : — 

From  her  fayre  head  her  fillet  she  iindight, 

And  layd  her  stole  aside  :  her  angels  face, 

As  the  great  eye  of  Heaven,  shyned  bright, 

And  made  a  sunshine  in  the  shady  place; 

Did  never  mortal  eye  behold  such  heavenly  grace. 

B.  I.  c.  3.  St.  4. 

6.  In  Spenser  we  see  the  brightest  and 
purest  form  of  that  nationality  which  was  so 
common  a  characteristic  of  our  elder  poets. 
There  is  nothing  unamiable,  nothing  con- 
temptuous of  others,  in  it.  To  glorify  their 
country — to  elevate  England  into  a  queen,  an 
empress  of  the  heart — this  was  their  passion 
and  object;  and  how  dear  and  important  an 
object  it  was  or  may  be,  let  Spain,  in  the  re- 
collection of  her  Cid,  declare  !  There  is  a  great 
magic  in  national  names.  AVhat  a  damper  to 
all  interest  is  a  list  of  native  East  Indian  mer- 
chants !  Unknown  names  are  non-conductors  ; 
they  stop  all  sympathy.  No  one  of  our  poets 
has  touched  this  string  more  exquisitely  than 
Spenser ;  especially  in  his  chronicle  of  the 
British  Kings  (B.  II.  c.  10.),  and  the  marriage 
of  the  Thames  with  the  Medway  (B.  IV.  c.  1 1 .), 
in  both  which  passages  the  mere  names  con- 
stitute half  the  pleasure  we  receive.  To  the 
same  feeling  we  must  in  particular  attribute 
Spenser's  sweet  reference  to  Ireland  : — 

Ne  thence  the  Irishe  rivers  absent  were  ; 

Sith  no  lesse  famous  than  the  rest  they  be,  &c.     lb. 

»  *  * 

And  MuUa  mine,  whose  waves  I  whilom  taught  to  weep.  lb. 


LECTURE  III.  97 

And  there  is  a  beautiful  passage  of  the  same 
sort  ill  the  Colin  Clout's  Come  Home  Again : — 

"  One  day,"  quoth  he,  "  I  sat,  as  was  my  trade, 
Under  the  foot  of  Mole,"  &c. 

Lastly,  the  great  and  prevailing  character  of 
Spenser's  mind  is  fancy  under  the  conditions 
of  imagination,  as  an  ever  present  but  not 
always  active  power.  He  has  an  imaginative 
fancy,  but  he  has  not  imagination,  in  kind  or 
degree,  as  Shakspeare  and  Milton  have ;  the 
boldest  effort  of  his  powers  in  this  way  is  the 
character  of  Talus.*  Add  to  this  a  feminine 
tenderness  and  almost  maidenly  purity  of 
feeling,  and  above  all,  a  deep  moral  earnest- 
ness which  produces  a  believing  sympathy 
and  acquiescence  in  the  reader,  and  you  have 
a  tolerably  adequate  view  of  Spenser's  intel- 
lectual being. 


LECTURE  VIL 

BEN  JONSON,  BEAUMONT  AND  FLETCHEK,  AND 

MASSINOER. 

A  CONTEMPORARY  is  rather  an  ambiguous 
term,  when  applied  to  authors.  It  may  simply 
mean  that  one  man  lived  and  wrote  while 
another   was   yet   alive,  however  deeply   the 

*  B.  5.  Legend  of  Artegall.     Ed. 
VOL.  I.  H 


98  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Ibrmer  may  have  been  indebted  to  the  latter 
as  liis  model.  There  have  been  instances  in 
the  literary  world  that  might  remind  a  botanist 
of  a  singular  sort  of  parasite  plant,  which 
rises  above  ground,  independent  and  unsup- 
ported, an  apparent  original ;  but  trace  its 
roots,  and  you  will  find  the  fibres  all  termi- 
nating in  the  root  of  another  plant  at  an 
unsuspected  distance,  which,  perhaps,  from 
want  of  sun  and  genial  soil,  and  the  loss  of  sap, 
has  scarcely  been  able  to  peep  above  the 
ground. — Or  the  word  may  mean  those  whose 
compositions  were  contemporaneous  in  such  a 
sense  as  to  preclude  all  likelihood  of  the 
one  having  borrowed  from  the  other.  In  the 
latter  sense  I  should  call  Ben  Jonson  a  con- 
temporary of  Shakspeare,  though  he  long  sur- 
vived him  ;  while  I  should  prefer  the  phrase 
of  immediate  successors  for  Beaumont  and 
Fletcher,  and  Massinger,  though  they  too 
were  Shakspeare's  contemporaries  in  the  for- 
mer sense. 


Ben  Jonson.* 
Born,  1574.— Died,  1637. 

Ben  Jonson  is  original ;  he  is,  indeed,  the 
only  one  of  the  great  dramatists  of  that  day 
who  was  not  either  directly  produced,  or  very 

*  From  Mr.  Green's  note.     Ed. 


LECTURE  VII.  99 

greatly  modified,  by  Shakspeare.  In  truth, 
he  differs  from  our  great  master  in  every 
thing — in  form  and  in  substance — and  betrays 
no  tokens  of  his  proximity.  He  is  not  original 
in  the  same  way  as  Shakspeare  is  original  ; 
but  after  a  fashion  of  his  own,  Ben  Jonson  is 
most  truly  original. 

The  characters  in  his  plays  are,  in  the 
strictest  sense  of  the  term,  abstractions.  Some 
very  prominent  feature  is  taken  from  the  whole 
man,  and  that  single  feature  or  humour  is  made 
the  basis  upon  which  the  entire  character  is 
built  up.  Ben  Jonson 's  dramatis  personce  are 
almost  as  fixed  as  the  masks  of  the  ancient 
actors  ;  you  know  from  the  first  scene — some- 
times from  the  list  of  names — exactly  what 
every  one  of  them  is  to  be.  He  was  a  very 
accurately  observing  man ;  but  he  cared  only 
to  observe  what  was  external  or  open  to,  and 
likely  to  impress,  the  senses.  He  individual- 
izes, not  so  much,  if  at  all,  by  the  exhibition  of 
moral  or  intellectual  differences,  as  by  the 
varieties  and  contrasts  of  manners,  modes  of 
speech  and  tricks  of  temper  ;  as  in  such  cha- 
racters as  Puntarvolo,  Bobadill,  &c. 

I  believe  there  is  not  one  whim  or  affectation 
in  common  life  noted  in  any  memoir  of  that 
age  which  may  not  be  found  drawn  and  framed 
in  some  corner  or  other  of  Ben  Jonson 's  dra- 
mas ;  and  they  have  this  merit,  in  common 
with  Hogarth's  prints,  that  not  a  single  cir- 
cumstance is  introduced  in  them  which  does 


100  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

not  play  upon,  and  help  to  bring  out,  the 
dominant  humour  or  humours  of  the  piece. 
Indeed  I  ought  very  particularly  to  call  your 
attention  to  the  extraordinary  skill  shown  by 
Ben  Jonson  in  contriving  situations  for  the 
display  of  his  characters.  In  fact,  his  care 
and  anxiety  in  this  matter  led  him  to  do  what 
scarcely  any  of  the  dramatists  of  that  age  did 
— that  is,  invent  his  plots.  It  is  not  a  first 
perusal  that  suffices  for  the  full  perception  of 
the  elaborate  artifice  of  the  plots  of  the  Alche- 
mist and  the  Silent  Woman ; — that  of  the 
former  is  absolute  perfection  for  a  necessary 
entanglement,  and  an  unexpected,  yet  natural, 
evolution . 

Ben  Jonson  exhibits  a  sterling  English  dic- 
tion, and  he  has  with  great  skill  contrived 
varieties  of  construction  ;  but  his  style  is  rarely 
sweet  or  harmonious,  in  consequence  of  his 
labour  at  point  and  strength  being  so  evident. 
In  all  his  works,  in  verse  or  prose,  there  is  an 
extraordinary  opulence  of  thought ;  but  it  is 
the  produce  of  an  amassing  power  in  the  au- 
thor, and  not  of  a  growth  from  within.  In- 
deed a  large  proportion  of  Ben  Jon  son's 
thoughts  may  be  traced  to  classic  or  obscure 
modern  writers,  by  those  who  are  learned  and 
curious  enough  to  follow  the  steps  of  this 
robust,  surly,  and  observing  dramatist. 


LECTURE  VII.  101 


Beaumont.     Born,  1580. — Died,  1616. 
Fletcher.      Bom,  1576.— Died,  1625. 

Mr.  Weber,  to  whose  taste,  industry,  and 
appropriate  erudition  we  owe,  I  will  not  say 
the  best,  (for  that  would  be  saying  little,)  but 
a  good,  edition  of  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  has 
complimented  the  Philaster,  which  he  himself 
describes  as  inferior  to  the  Maid's  Tragedy  by 
the  same  writers,  as  but  little  below  the  noblest 
of  Shakspeare's  plays,  Lear,  Macbeth,  Othello, 
&c.  and  consequently  implying  the  equality, 
at  least,  of  the  Maid's  Tragedy ; — and  an  emi- 
nent living  critic, — who  in  the  manly  wit,  strong 
sterling  sense,  and  robust  style  of  his  ori- 
ginal works,  had  presented  the  best  possible 
credentials  of  office  as  charge  d'affaires  of  lite- 
rature in  general, — and  who  by  his  edition  of 
Massinger — a  work  in  which  there  was  more 
for  an  editor  to  do,  and  in  which  more  was  ac- 
tually well  done,  than  in  any  similar  work 
within  my  knowledge — has  proved  an  especial 
right  of  authority  in  the  appreciation  of  dra- 
matic poetry,  and  hath  potentially  a  double 
voice  with  the  public  in  his  own  right  and  in 
that  of  the  critical  synod,  where,  as  princeps 
senatits,  he  possesses  it  by  his  prerogative, — has 
affirmed  that  Shakspeare's  superiority  to  his 
contemporaries  rests  on  his  superior  wit  alone, 
while  in  all  the  other,  and,  as  I  should  deem. 


10-2  couusi:  OF  lectures. 

higher  excellencies  of  the  drama,  character, 
pathos,  depth  of  thought,  &c.  he  is  equalled 
by  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Ben  Jonson,  and 
Massinger  !* 

Of  wit  I  am  engaged  to  treat  in  another 
Lecture.  It  is  a  genus  of  many  species  ;  and 
at  present  I  shall  only  say,  that  the  species 
which  is  predominant  in  Sliakspeare,  is  so 
completely  Shakspearian,  and  in  its  essence  so 
interwoven  with  all  his  other  characteristic 
excellencies,  that  I  am  equally  incapable  of 
comprehending,  both  how  it  can  be  detached 
from  his  other  powers,  and  how,  being  dispa- 
rate in  kind  from  the  wit  of  contemporary  dra- 
matists, it  can  be  compared  with  theirs  in 
degree.  And  again — the  detachment  and  the 
practicability  of  the  comparison  being  granted 
— I  should,  I  confess,  be  rather  inclined  to  con- 
cede the  contrary  ; — and  in  the  most  common 
species  of  wit,  and  in  the  ordinary  application 
of  the  term,  to  yield  this  particular  palm  to 
Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  whom  here  and  here- 
after I  take  as  one  poet  with  two  names, — 
leaving  undivided  what  a  rare  love  and  still 
rarer  congeniality  have  united.  At  least,  1 
have  never  been  able  to  distinguish  the  pre- 
sence of  Fletcher  during  the  life  of  Beaumont, 
nor  the  absence  of  Beaumont  during  the  sur- 
vival of  Fletcher. 

But  waiving,  or  rather  deferring,  this  ques- 

*  See  Mr.  Gifford's  introduction  to  his  edition  of  Massin- 
ger,    Ed. 


LECTURK  \'II.  103 

tion,  I  protest  against  the  remainder  of  the  po- 
sition in  toto.  And  indeed,  whilst  I  can  never, 
I  trust,  show  myself  blind  to  the  various  merits 
of  Jonson,  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  and  Mas- 
singer,  or  insensible  to  the  greatness  of  the 
merits  which  they  possess  in  common,  or  to 
the  specific  excellencies  which  give  to  each  of 
the  three  a  worth  of  his  own, — I  confess,  that 
one  main  object  of  this  Lecture  was  to  prove 
that  Shakspeare's  eminence  is  his  own,  and 
not  that  of  his  age; — even  as  the  pine-apple, 
the  melon,  and  the  gourd  may  grow  on  the 
same  bed ; — yea,  the  same  circumstances  of 
warmth  and  soil  may  be  necessary  to  their 
full  development,  yet  do  not  account  for  the 
golden  hue,  the  ambrosial  flavour,  the  perfect 
shape  of  the  pine-apple,  or  the  tufted  crown  on 
its  head.  Would  that  those,  who  seek  to  twist 
it  off,  could  but  promise  us  in  this  instance  to 
make  it  the  germ  of  an  equal  successor  ! 

What  had  a  grammatical  and  logical  con- 
sistency for  the  ear, — what  could  be  put  to- 
gether and  represented  to  the  eye — these  poets 
took  from  the  ear  and  eye,  unchecked  by  any 
intuition  of  an  inward  impossibility  ; — ^justasa 
man  might  put  together  a  quarter  of  an  orange, 
a  quarter  of  an  apple,  and  the  like  of  a  lemon 
and  a  pomegranate,  and  make  it  look  like  one 
round  diverse-coloured  fruit.  But  nature,  which 
works  from  within  by  evolution  and  assimi- 
lation according  to  a  law,  cannot  do  so,  nor 
could  Shakspeare  \   for  he  too  worked  in  the 


J  04  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

spirit  of  nature,  by  evolving  the  germ  from 
within  by  the  imaginative  power  according  to 
an  idea.  For  as  the  power  of  seeing  is  to 
lighl,  so  is  an  idea  in  mind  to  a  law  in  nature. 
They  are  correlatives,  which  suppose  each 
other. 

The  plays  of  Beaumont  and  Fletcher  are 
mere  aggregations  without  unity ;  in  the  Shaks- 
pearian  drama  there  is  a  vitality  which  grows 
and  evolves  itself  from  within, — a  key  note 
which  guides  and  controls  the  harmonies 
throughout.  What  is  Lear? — It  is  storm  and 
tempest — the  thunder  at  first  grumbling  in  the 
far  horizon,  then  gathering  around  us,  and  at 
length  bursting  in  fury  over  our  heads, — suc- 
ceeded by  a  breaking  of  the  clouds  for  a  while, 
a  last  flash  of  lightning,  the  closing  in  of 
night,  and  the  single  hope  of  darkness !  And 
Romeo  and  Juliet? — It  is  a  spring  day,  gusty 
and  beautiful  in  the  morn,  and  closing  like  an 
April  evening  with  the  song  of  the  nightingale  ; 
-—whilst  Macbeth  is  deep  and  earthy, — com- 
posed to  the  subterranean  music  of  a  troubled 
conscience,  which  converts  every  thing  into 
the  wild  and  fearful ! 

Doubtless  from  mere  observation,  or  from 
the  occasional  similarity  of  the  writer's  own 
character,  more  or  less  in  Beaumont  and 
Fletcher,  and  other  such  writers  will  happen 
to  be  in  correspondence  with  nature,  and  still 
more  in  apparent  compatibility  with  it.  But 
yet  the  false  source  is  always   discoverable, 


LECTURE  VII.  105 

first  by  the  gross  contradictions  to  nature  in  so 
many  other  parts,  and  secondly,  by  the  want 
of  the  impression  which  Shakspeare  makes, 
that  the  thing  said  not  only  might  have  been 
said,  but  that  nothing  else  could  be  substi- 
tuted, so  as  to  excite  the  same  sense  of  its  ex- 
quisite propriety.  I  have  always  thought  the 
conduct  and  expressions  of  Othello  and  lago 
in  the  last  scene,  when  lago  is  brought  in 
prisoner,  a  wonderful  instance  of  Shakspeare's 
consummate  judgment : — 

0th.    I  look  down  towards  his  feet ; — but  that's  a  fable. 

If  that  thou  be'st  a  devil,  I  cannot  kill  thee. 
lago.    I  bleed,  Sir;  but  not  kill'd. 
0th.    I  am  not  sorry  neither. 

Think  what  a  volley  of  execrations  and  de- 
fiances Beaumont  and  Fletcher  would  have 
poured  forth  here  ! 

Indeed  Massinger  and  Ben  Jonson  are  both 
more  perfect  in  their  kind  than  Beaumont  and 
Fletcher;  the  former  in  the  story  and  affecting- 
incidents  ;  the  latter  in  the  exhibition  of  man- 
ners and  peculiarities,  whims  in  language,  and 
vanities  of  appearance. 

There  is,  however,  a  diversity  of  the  most 
dangerous  kind  here.  Shakspeare  shaped  his 
characters  out  of  the  nature  within  ;  but  we 
cannot  so  safely  say,  out  of  his  own  nature  as 
an  individual  person.  No!  this  latter  is  itself 
but  a  natura  natnrata, — an  effect,  a  product, 
not  a  power.     It  was  Siiakspeare's  prerogative 


106  COURSE  OK  LECTURES. 

to  have  the  universal,  which  is  potentially  in 
each  particular,  opened  out  to  him,  the  homo 
geueralis,  not  as  an  abstraction  from  observation 
of  a  variety  of  men,  but  as  the  substance  ca- 
pable of  endless  modifications,  of  which  his 
own  personal  existence  was  but  one,  and  to 
use  this  one  as  the  eye  that  beheld  the  other, 
and  as  the  tongue  that  could  convey  the  dis- 
covery. There  is  no  greater  or  more  common 
vice  in  dramatic  writers  tlian  to  draw  out  of 
themselves.  How  I — alone  and  in  the  self- 
sufficiency  of  my  study,  as  all  men  are  apt  to 
be  proud  in  their  dreams — should  like  to  be 
talking  king  !  Shakspeare,  in  composing,  had 
no  /,  but  the  /  representative.  In  Beaumont 
and  Fletcher  you  have  descriptions  of  cha- 
racters by  the  poet  rather  than  the  characters 
themselves ;  we  are  told,  and  impressively 
told,  of  their  being;  but  we  rarely  or  never 
feel  that  they  actually  are. 

Beaumont  and  Fletcher  are  the  most  lyrical 
of  our  dramatists.  I  think  their  comedies  the 
best  part  of  their  works,  although  there  are 
scenes  of  very  deep  tragic  interest  in  some  of 
their  plays.  I  particularly  recommend  Mon- 
sieur Thomas  for  good  pure  comic  humor. 

There  is,  occasionally,  considerable  license 
in  their  dramas ;  and  this  opens  a  subject 
much  needing  vindication  and  sound  exposi- 
tion, but  which  is  beset  with  such  difficulties 
for  a  Lecturer,  that  I  must  pass  it  by.  Only 
as  far  as  Shakspeare  is  concerned,  I  own,  1 


LECTURE  VII.  107 

can  with  less  pain  admit  a  fault  in  him  than 
beg  an  excuse  for  it.  I  will  not,  therefore, 
attempt  to  palliate  the  grossness  that  actually 
exists  in  his  plays  by  the  customs  of  his  age,  or 
by  the  far  greater  coarseness  of  all  his  contem- 
poraries, excepting  Spenser,  who  is  himself  not 
wholly  blameless,  though  nearly  so;— for  I 
place  Shakspeare's  merit  on  being  of  no  age. 
But  I  would  clear  away  what  is,  in  my  judg- 
ment, not  his,  as  that  scene  of  the  Porter*  in 
Macbeth,  and  many  other  such  passages,  and 
abstract  what  is  coarse  in  manners  only,  and 
all  that  which  from  the  frequency  of  our  own 
vices,  we  associate  with  his  words.  If  this 
were  truly  done,  little  that  could  be  justly  re- 
prehensible would  remain.  Compare  the  vile 
comments,  offensive  and  defensive,  on  Pope's 

Lust  thro'  some  gentle  strainers,  &c. 

with  the  M'orst  thing  in  Shakspeare,  or  even 
in  Beaumont  and  Fletcher  ;  and  then  consider 
how  unfair  the  attack  is  on  our  old  dramatists  ; 
especially  because  it  is  an  attack  that  cannot 
be  properly  answered  in  that  presence  in  which 
an  answer  would  be  most  desirable,  from  the 
painful  nature  of  one  part  of  the  position  ; 
but  this  very  pain  is  almost  a  demonstration 
of  its  falsehood ! 

*  Act  ii.  sc.  3. 


108  course  of  lectures. 

Massinger. 
Born  at  Salisbury,  1584. — Died,  1610. 

With  regard  to  Massinger,  observe, 
1 .  The  vein  of  satire  on  the  times ;  but  this 
is  not  as  in  Shakspeare,  where  the  natures 
evolve  themselves  according  to  their  incidental 
disproportions,  from  excess,  deficiency,  or  mis- 
location,  of  one  or  more  of  the  component 
elements ;  but  is  merely  satire  on  what  is  at- 
tributed to  them  by  others. 

2.  His  excellent  metre — a  better  model  for 
dramatists  in  general  to  imitate  than  Shaks- 
peare's, — even  if  a  dramatic  taste  existed  in 
the  frequenters  of  the  stage,  and  could  be  gra- 
tified  in  the  present  size  and  management,  or 
rather  mismanagement,  of  the  two  patent 
theatres.  I  do  not  mean  that  Massinger's 
verse  is  superior  to  Shakspeare's  or  equal  to  it. 
Far  from  it ;  but  it  is  much  more  easily  con- 
structed and  may  be  more  successfully  adopted 
by  writers  in  the  present  day.  It  is  the 
nearest  approach  to  the  language  of  real  life 
at  all  compatible  with  a  fixed  metre.  In 
Massinger,  as  in  all  our  poets  before  Dryden, 
in  order  to  make  harmonious  verse  in  the 
reading,  it  is  absolutely  necessary  that  the 
meaning  should  be  understood ;— when  the 
meaning  is  once  seen,  then  the  harmony  is 
perfect.     Whereas  in  Pope  and  in  most  of  the 


LECTURE  VII.  109 

writers  who  followed  in  his  school,  it  is  the 
mechanical  metre  which  determines  the  sense. 

3.  The  impropriety,  and  indecorum  of  de- 
meanour in  his  favourite  characters,  as  in  Ber- 
toldo  in  the  Maid  of  Honour,  who  is  a  swag- 
gerer, talking  to  his  sovereign  what  no  sove- 
reign could  endure,  and  to  gentlemen  what 
no  gentleman  would  answer  without  pulling 
his  nose. 

4.  Shakspeare's  Ague-cheek,  Osric,  &c.  are 
displayed  through  others,  in  the  course  of  social 
intercourse,  by  the  mode  of  their  performing- 
some  office  in  which  they  are  employed ;  but 
Massinger's  Sylli  come  forward  to  declare 
themselves  fools  ad  aihitrium  auctoris,  and  so 
the  diction  always  needs  the  suhiritelligitur 
('  the  man  looks  as  if  he  thought  so  and  so,') 
expressed  in  the  language  of  the  satirist,  and 
not  in  that  of  the  man  himself: — 

Sylli.  You  may,  madam, 
Perhaps,  believe  that  I  in  this  use  art 
To  make  you  dote  upon  me,  by  exposing 
My  more  than  most  rare  features  to  your  view  ; 
But  I,  as  I  have  ever  done,  deal  simply, 
A  mark  of  sweet  simplicity,  ever  noted 
In  the  family  of  the  Syllis.     Therefore,  lady, 
Look  not  with  too  much  contemplation  on  me ; 
If  you  do,  you  are  in  the  suds. 

Maid  of  Honour,  act  i.  sc.  2. 

The  author  mixes  his  own  feelings  and  judg- 
ments concerning  the  presumed  fool ;  but  the 
man  himself,  till  mad,  tights  up  against  them, 
and  betrays,  by  his  attempts  to  modify  them, 


no  COURSE  OF  LECTURliS. 

that  he  is  no  fool  at  all,  but  one  gifted  with 
activity  and  copiousness  of  thought,  image  and 
expression,  which  belong  not  to  a  fool,  but  to 
a  man  of  wit  making  himself  merry  with  his 
own  character. 

5.  There  is  an  utter  want  of  preparation  in 
the  decisive  acts  of  Massinger's  characters,  as 
in  Cainiola  and  Aurelia  in  the  Maid  of  Honour. 
Why?  Because  the  dramatis personce  were  all 
planned  each  by  itself.  Whereas  in  Shaks- 
peare,  the  play  is  syiigenesia;  each  character 
has,  indeed,  a  life  of  its  own,  and  is  an  indivi- 
dmim  of  itself,  but  yet  an  organ  of  the  whole, 
as  the  heart  in  the  human  body.  Shakspeare 
was  a  great  comparative  anatomist. 

Hence  Massinger  and  all,  indeed,  but  Shaks- 
peare, take  a  dislike  to  their  own  characters, 
and  spite  themselves  upon  them  by  making 
them  talk  like  fools  or  monsters ;  as  Fulgentio 
in  his  visit  to  Camiola,  (Act  ii.  sc.  2.)  Hence 
too,  in  Massinger,  the  continued  flings  at  kings, 
courtiers,  and  all  the  favourites  of  fortune,  like 
one  who  had  enough  of  intellect  to  see  injus- 
tice in  his  own  inferiority  in  the  share  of  the 
good  things  of  life,  but  not  genius  enough  to 
rise  above  it,  and  forget  himself.  Beaumont 
and  Fletcher  have  the  same  vice  in  the  oppo- 
site pole,  a  servility  of  sentiment  and  a  spirit 
of  partizanship  with  the  monarchical  faction. 

0.  From  the  want  of  a  guiding  point  in  Mas- 
singer's  characters,  you  never  know  what  they 
are  about.     In  fact  they  have  no  character. 

7.  Note  the  faultiness  of  his  soliloquies,  with 


LECTURE  VII.  11  I 

connectives  and  arrangements,  that  have  no 
other  motive  but  the  fear  lest  the  audience 
should  not  understand  him. 

8.  A  play  of  Massinger's  produces  no  one 
single  effect,  whether  arising  from  the  spirit  of 
the  whole,  as  in  the  As  You  Like  It ;  or  from 
any  one  indisputably  prominent  character  as 
Hamlet.  It  is  just  "  which  you  like  best,  gen- 
tlemen !" 

9.  The  unnaturally  irrational  passions  and 
strange  whims  of  feeling  which  Massinger 
delights  to  draw,  deprive  the  reader  of  all 
sound  interest  in  the  characters ; — as  in  Ma- 
thias  in  the  Picture,  and  in  other  instances. 

10.  The  comic  scenes  in  Massinger  not  only 
do  not  harmonize  with  the  tragic,  not  only  in- 
terrupt the  feeling,  but  degrade  the  characters 
that  are  to  form  any  part  in  the  action  of  the 
piece,  so  as  to  render  them  unfit  for  any  tragic 
interest.  At  least,  they  do  not  concern,  or  act 
upon,  or  modify,  the  principal  characters.  As 
when  a  gentleman  is  insulted  by  a  mere  black- 
guard,— it  is  the  same  as  if  any  other  accident 
of  nature  had  occurred,  a  pig  run  under  his 
legs,  or  his  horse  thrown  him.  There  is  no 
dramatic  interest  in  it. 

I  like  Massinger's  comedies  better  than  his 
tragedies,  although  where  the  situation  requires 
it,  he  often  rises  into  the  truly  tragic  and  pa- 
thetic. He  excells  in  narration,  and  for  the 
most  part  displays  his  mere  story  with  skill. 
But  he  is  not  a  poet  of  high  imagination  ;  he  is 
like  a  Flemish  painter,  in  whose  delineations 


112  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

objects  appear  as  they  do  in  nature,  have  the 
same  force  and  truth,  and  produce  the  same 
effect  upon  the  spectator.  But  Shakspeare  is 
beyond  this ; — he  always  by  metaphors  and 
figures  involves  in  the  thing  considered  a  uni- 
verse of  past  and  possible  experiences;  he 
mingles  earth,  sea  and  air,  gives  a  soul  to 
every  thing,  and  at  the  same  time  that  he  in- 
spires hiniian  feelings,  adds  a  dignity  in  his 
imaaes  to  human  nature  itself: — 


'O' 


Full  many  a  glorious  morning  have  I  seen 
Flatter  the  mountain  tops  with  sovereign  eye  ; 
Kissing  with  golden  face  the  meadows  green, 
Gilding  pale  streams  with  heavenly  alchymy,  &c. 

33rd  Sonnet. 

Note. — Have  I  not  over-rated  Gifford's  edi- 
tion of  Massinger? — Not, — if  I  have,  as  but  just 
is,  main  reference  to  the  restitution  of  the  text ; 
but  yes,  perhaps,  if  I  were  talking  of  the  notes. 
These  are  more  often  wrong  than  right.  In 
the  Maid  of  Honour,  Act  i.  sg.  5.  Astutio  de- 
scribes Fulgentio  as  "  A  gentleman,  yet  no 
lord."  Gifford  supposes  a  transposition  of 
the  press  for  "  No  gentleman,  yet  a  lord." 
But  this  would  have  no  connection  with  what 
follows ;  and  we  have  only  to  recollect  that 
**  lord"  means  a  lord  of  lands,  to  see  that  the 
after  lines  are  explanatory.  He  is  a  man  of 
high  birth,  but  no  landed  property  ; — as  to  the 
former,  he  is  a  distant  branch  of  the  blood 
royal ; — as  to  the  latter,  his  whole  rent  lies  in 


LECTURE  VII.  1  13 

a  narrow  compass,  the  king's  ear  !  In  the  same 
scene  the  text  stands  : 

Bert.  No  !  they  are  useful 
For  your  imitation  ; — I  remember  you,  &c. ; — 

and  Gifford  condemns  Mason's  conjecture  of 
'initiation'  as  void  of  meaning  and  harmony. 
Now  my  ear  deceives  me  if  '  initiation'  be  not 
the  right  word.  In  fact, '  imitation'  is  utterly  im- 
pertinent to  all  that  follows.  Bertoldo  tells  An- 
tonio that  he  had  been  initiated  in  the  manners 
suited  to  the  court  by  two  or  three  sacred 
beauties,  and  that  a  similar  experience  would 
be  equally  useful  for  his  initiation  into  the 
camp.  Not  a  word  of  his  imitation.  Besides, 
I  say  the  rhythm  requires '  initiation,'  and  is 
lame  as  the  verse  now  stands. 


LECTURE  VIII. 
Don  Quixote. 

Cervantes. 

Born  at  Madrid,  1547  ; — Shakspeare,  1564; 
both  put  off  mortality  on  the  same  day,  the 
23rd  of  April,  1616, — the  one  in  the  sixty- 
ninth,  the  other  in  the  fifty-second,  year  of  his 
life.  The  resemblance  in  their  physiognomies 
is  striking,  but  with  a  predominance  of  acute- 
ness  in  Cervantes,  and  of  reflection  in  Shaks- 

VOL.   I.  I 


114  COUnSE  OF  LECTURES. 

peare,  which  is  the  specific  difference  between 
the  Spanish  and  English  characters  of  mind. 

I.  The  nature  and  eminence  of  Symbolical 
writing  ; — 

II.  Madness,  and  its  different  sorts,  (consi- 
dered without  pretension  to  medical  science) ; — 

To  each  of  these,  or  at  least  to  my  own 
notions  respecting  them,  I  must  devote  a  few 
words  of  explanation,  in  order  to  render  the 
after  critique  on  Don  Quixote,  the  master  work 
of  Cervantes'  and  his  country's  genius  easily 
and  throughout  intelligible.  This  is  not  the 
least  valuable,  though  it  may  most  often  be  felt 
by  us  both  as  the  heaviest  and  least  entertain- 
ing portion  of  these  critical  disquisitions :  for 
without  it,  I  must  have  foregone  one  at  least  of 
the  two  appropriate  objects  of  a  Lecture,  that 
of  interesting  you  during  its  delivery,  and  of 
leaving  behind  in  your  minds  the  germs  of 
after-thought,  and  tlie  materials  for  future  en- 
joyment. To  have  been  assured  by  several  of 
my  intelligent  auditors  that  they  have  re- 
perused  Hamlet  or  Othello  with  increased 
satisfaction  in  consequence  of  the  new  points 
of  view  in  which  I  had  placed  those  characters 
— is  the  highest  compliment  I  could  receive  or 
desire  ;  and  should  the  address  of  this  evening 
open  out  a  new  source  of  pleasure,  or  enlarge 
the  former  in  your  perusal  of  Don  Quixote,  it 
will  compensate  for  the  failure  of  any  personal 
or  temporary  object. 

I.    The    Symbolical    cannot,    perhaps,    be 


LECTURR  VIII.  115 

better  defined  in  distinction  from  the  Allego- 
rical, than  that  it  is  always  itself  a  part  of  that, 
of  the  whole  of  which  it  is  the  representative. 
— "  Here  comes  a  sail," — (that  is,  a  ship) 
is  a  symbolical  expression.  "  Behold  our 
lion  ! "  when  we  speak  of  some  gallant  soldier, 
is  allegorical.  Of  most  importance  to  our  pre- 
sent subject  is  this  point,  that  the  latter  (the 
allegory)  cannot  be  other  than  spoken  con- 
sciously ; — whereas  in  the  former  (the  symbol) 
it  is  very  possible  that  the  general  truth  repre- 
sented may  be  working  unconsciously  in  the 
writer's  mind  during  the  construction  of  the 
symbol ; — and  it  proves  itself  by  being  pro- 
duced out  of  his  own  mind, — as  the  Don 
Quixote  out  of  the  perfectly  sane  mind  of 
Cervantes,  and  not  by  outward  observation,  or 
historically.  The  advantage  of  symbolical 
writing  over  allegory  is,  that  it  presumes  no 
disjunction  of  faculties,  but. simple  predomi- 
nance. 

11.  Madness  may  be  divided  as  — 

1.  hypochondriasis;   or,  the   man   is  out 
of  his  senses. 

2.  derangement  of   the   understanding ; 
or,  the  man  is  out  of  his  wits. 

3.  loss  of  reason. 

4.  frenzy,  or  derangement  of  the  sensa- 
tions. 

Cervantes's  own  preface  to  Don  Quixote  is 
a  perfect  model  of  the  gentle,  every  where 
intelligible,  irony  in  the  best    essays   of  the 


116  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Tatler  and  the  Spectator.  Equally  natural 
and  easy,  Cervantes  is  more  spirited  than 
Addison  ;  whilst  he  blends  with  the  terseness 
of  Swift,  an  exquisite  flow  and  music  of  style, 
and  above  all,  contrasts  with  the  latter  by  the 
sweet  temper  of  a  superior  mind,  which  saw 
the  follies  of  mankind,  and  was  even  at  the 
moment  suffering  severely  under  hard  mis- 
treatment;* and  yet  seems  every  where  to 
have  but  one  thought  as  the  undersong — 
"  Brethren !  with  all  your  faults  I  love  you 
still!" — or  as  a  mother  that  chides  the  child 
she  loves,  with  one  hand  holds  up  the  rod,  and 
with  the  other  wipes  off  each  tear  as  it  drops! 
Don  Quixote  was  neither  fettered  to  the 
earth  by  want,  nor  holden  in  its  embraces  by 
wealth ; — of  which,  with  the  temperance  na- 
tural to  his  country,  as  a  Spaniard,  he  had 
both  far  too  little,  and  somewhat  too  much,  to 
be  under  any  necessity  of  thinking  about  it. 
His  age  too,  fifty,  may  be  well  supposed  to 
prevent  his  mind  from  being  tempted  out  of 
itself  by  any  of  the  lower  passions  ; — while  his 
habits,  as  a  very  early  riser  and  a  keen  sports- 
man, were  such  as  kept  his  spare  body  in 
serviceable  subjection  to  his  will,  and  yet  by 
the  play  of  hope  that  accompanies  pursuit, 

*  Bien  como  quien  se  engendro  en  una  carcel,  donde  toda 
incomodidad  tiene  su  assiento,  y  todo  triste  ruido  hace  su 
habitacion.  Like  one  you  may  suppose  born  in  a  prison, 
where  every  inconvenience  keeps  its  residence,  and  every  dis- 
mal sound  its  liabitation.     Pref.  Jarvis's  Tr.     Ed. 


LECTURE  VIII.  117 

not  only  permitted,  but  assisted,  his  fancy  in 
shaping  what  it  would.  Nor  must  we  omit 
his  meagerness  and  entire  featureliness,  face 
and  frame,  which  Cervantes  gives  us  at  once  : 
"  It  is  said  that  his  surname  was  Quixada  or 
Quesacla,''  &c. — even  in  this  trifle  showing  an 
exquisite  judgment ; — just  once  insinuating  the 
association  of  lantern-jmcs  into  the  reader's 
mind,  yet  not  retaining  it  obtrusively  like  the 
names  in  old  farces  and  in  the  Pilgrim's  Pro- 
gress,— but  taking  for  the  regular  appellative 
one  which  had  the  no  meaning  of  a  proper 
name  in  real  life,  and  which  yet  was  capable 
of  recalling  a  number  of  very  difterent,  but  all 
pertinent,  recollections,  as  old  armour,  the 
precious  metals  hidden  in  the  ore,  &c.  Don 
Quixote's  leanness  and  featureliness  are  happy 
exponents  of  the  excess  of  the  formative  or 
imaginative  in  him,  contrasted  with  Sancho's 
plump  rotundity,  and  recipiency  of  external 
impression. 

He  has  no  knowledge  of  the  sciences  or 
scientific  arts  which  give  to  the  meanest  por- 
tions of  matter  an  intellectual  interest,  and 
which  enable  the  mind  to  decypher  in  the 
world  of  the  senses  the  invisible  agency — that 
alone,  of  which  the  world's  phenomena  are  the 
effects  and  manifestations, — and  thus,  as  in  a 
mirror,  to  contemplate  its  own  reflex,  its  life 
in  the  powers,  its  imagination  in  the  symbolic 
forms,  its  moral  instincts  in  the  final  causes, 
and  its  reason  in  the  laws  of  material  nature: 


1  18  COURSE  or  LliCTURES. 

but — estranged  i'roui  all  the  motives  to  obser- 
vation from  self-iiiterest — the  persons  that  sur- 
round him  too  few  and  too  familiar  to  enter 
into  any  connection  with  his  thoughts,  or  to 
require  any  adaptation  of  his  conduct  to  their 
particular  characters  or  relations  to  himself — 
his  judgment  lies  fallow,  with  nothing  to  ex- 
cite, nothing  to  employ  it.  Yet, — and  here  is 
the  point,  where  genius  even  of  the  most  per- 
fect kind,  allotted  but  to  few  in  the  course  of 
many  ages,  does  not  preclude  the  necessity  in 
part,  and  in  part  counterbalance  the  craving 
by  sanity  of  judgment,  without  which  genius 
either  cannot  be,  or  cannot  at  least  manifest 
itself, — the  dependency  of  our  nature  asks  for 
some  confirmation  from  without,  though  it  be 
only  from  the  shadows  of  other  men's  fictions. 
Too  uninformed,  and  with  too  narrow  a 
sphere  of  power  and  opportunity  to  rise  into 
the  scientific  artist,  or  to  be  himself  a  patron  of 
art,  and  with  too  deep  a  principle  and  too 
much  innocence  to  become  a  mere  projector, 
Don  Quixote  has  recourse  to  romances  : — 

His  curiosity  and  extravagant  fondness  herein  arrived  at 
that  pitch,  that  he  sold  many  acres  of  arable  land  to  purchase 
books  of  knight-errantry,  and  carried  home  all  he  could  lay 
hands  on  of  that  kind  !     CI. 

The  more  remote  these  romances  were  from 
the  language  of  common  life,  the  more  akin 
on  that  very  account  were  they  to  the  shapeless 
dreams  and  strivings   of  his   own   mind; — a 


LECTURE  VIII,  11') 

mind,  which  possessed  not  the  highest  order  of 
genius  which  lives  in  an  atmosphere  of  power 
over  mankind,  but  that  minor  kind  which,  in 
its  restlessness,  seeks  for  a  vivid  representative 
of  its  own  wishes,  and  substitutes  the  move- 
ments of  that  objective  puppet  for  an  exercise 
of  actual  power  in  and  by  itself.  The  more 
wild  and  improbable  these  romances  were,  the 
more  were  they  akin  to  his  will,  which  had 
been  in  the  habit  of  acting  as  an  unlimited 
monarch  over  the  creations  of  his  fancy  ! 
Hence  observe  how  the  startling  of  the  remain- 
ing common  sense,  like  a  glimmering  before  its 
death,  in  the  notice  of  the  impossible-impro- 
bable of  Don  Belianis,  is  dismissed  by  Don 
Quixote  as  impertinent : — 

He  had  some  doubt*  as  to  the  dreadful  wounds  which 
Don  Belianis  gave  and  received  :  for  he  imagined,  that  not- 
withstanding the  most  expert  surgeons  had  cured  him,  his 
face  and  whole  body  must  still  be  full  of  seams  and  scars. 
Nevertheless  ^  he  commended  in  his  author  the  concluding 
his  book  with'  a  promise  of  that  unfinishable  adventure!  C.  1. 

Hence  also  his  first  intention  to  turn  author; 
but  who,  with  such  a  restless  struggle  within 
him,  could  content  himself  with  writing  in  a 
remote  village  among  apathists  and  ignorants? 
During  his  colloquies  with  the  village  priest 
and  the  barber  surgeon,  in  which  the  fervour 
of  critical  controversy  feeds  the  passion  and 

*   No  estaba  muy  bieii  con.     Ed. 
f  Pero  con  todo.     Ed, 


120  (OUUSE  OF  LECTURES. 

gives  retility  to  its  object — what  more  natural 
than  that  the  mental  striving  should  become 
an  eddy  ? — madness  may  perhaps  be  defined  as 
the  circling  in  a  stream  which  should  be  pro- 
gressive and  adaptive :  Don  Quixote  grows  at 
length  to  be  a  man  out  of  his  wits;  his  under- 
standing is  deranged  ;  and  hence  without  the 
least  deviation  from  the  truth  of  nature,  with- 
out losing  the  least  trait  of  personal  individu- 
ality, he  becomes  a  substantial  living  allegory, 
or  personification  of  the  reason  and  the  moral 
sense,  divested  of  the  judgment  and  the  un- 
derstanding. Sancho  is  the  converse.  He  is 
the  common  sense  without  reason  or  imagina- 
tion ;  and  Cervantes  not  only  shows  the  excel- 
lence and  power  of  reason  in  Don  Quixote,  but 
in  both  him  and  Sancho  the  mischiefs  result- 
ing from  a  severance  of  the  two  main  consti- 
tuents of  sound  intellectual  and  moral  action. 
Put  him  and  his  master  together,  and  they 
form  a  perfect  intellect ;  but  they  are  separated 
and  M'ithout  cement ;  and  hence  each  having 
a  need  of  the  other  for  its  own  completeness, 
each  has  at  times  a  mastery  over  the  other. 
For  the  common  sense,  although  it  may  see 
the  practical  inapplicability  of  the  dictates  of 
the  imagination  or  abstract  reason,  yet  cannot 
help  submitting  to  them.  These  two  cha- 
racters possess  the  world,  alternately  and  in- 
terchangeably the  cheater  and  the  cheated. 
To  impersonate  them,  and  to  combine  the  per- 
manent with  the  individual,  is  one  of  the 
highest    creations   of  genius,    and    has   been 


LECTURE  VIII.  121 

achieved  by  Cervantes  and  Shakspeare,  almost 
alone. 


Observations  on  particular  passages, 

B.  I.  c.  1.  But  not  altogether  approving  of  his  having 
broken  it  to  pieces  with  so  much  ease,  to  secure  himself  from 
the  like  danger  for  the  future,  he  made  it  over  again,  fencing 
it  with  small  bars  of  iron  within,  in  such  a  manner,  that  he 
rested  satisfied  of  its  strength  ;  and  luithout  caring  to  make 
afresh  experiment  on  it,  he  approved  and  looked  upon  it  as 
a  most  excellent  helmet. 

His  not  trying  his  improved  scull-cap  is  an 
exquisite  trait  of  human  character,  founded 
on  the  oppugnancy  of  the  soul  in  such  a  state 
to  any  disturbance  by  doubt  of  its  own  brood- 
ings.  Even  the  long  deliberation  about  his 
horse's  name  is  full  of  meaning  ; — for  in  these 
day-dreams  the  greater  part  of  the  history 
passes  and  is  carried  on  in  words,  which  look 
forward  to  other  words  as  what  will  be  said  of 
them. 

lb.  Near  the  place  where  he  lived,  there  dwelt  a  very 
comely  country  lass,  with  whom  he  had  formerly  been  in 
love;  though;  as  it  is  supposed,  she  never  knew  it,  nor 
troubled  herself  about  it. 

The  nascent  love  for  the  country  lass,  but 
without  any  attempt  at  utterance,  or  an  oppor- 
tunity of  knowing  her,  except  as  the  hint — the 
on  Uti — of  the  inward  imagination,  is  happily 
conceived  in  both  parts  ; — first,  as  confirmative 
of  the  shrinking  back  of  the  mind  on  itself,  and 
its  dread  of  having  a  cherished  image  destroyed 


122  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

by  its  own  judgment ;  and  secondly,  as  show- 
ing how  necessarily  love  is  the  passion  of 
novels.  Novels  are  to  love  as  fairy  tales  to 
dreams.  I  never  knew  but  two  men  of  taste 
and  feeling  who  could  not  understand  why  I 
was  delighted  with  the  Arabian  Nights'  Tales, 
and  they  were  likewise  the  only  persons  in  my 
knowledge  who  scarcely  remembered  having 
ever  dreamed.  Magic  and  war — itself  a  ma- 
gic— are  the  day-dreams  of  childhood  ;  love  is 
the  day-dream  of  youth  and  early  manhood. 

C.  2.  "  Scarcely  had  ruddy  Phoebus  spread  the  golden 
tresses  of  his  beauteous  hair  over  the  face  of  the  wide  and 
spacious  earth ;  and  scarcely  had  the  little  painted  birds, 
with  the  sweet  and  mellifluous  harmony  of  their  forked 
tongues,  saluted  the  approach  of  rosy  Aurora,  who,  quitting 
the  soft  couch  of  her  jealous  husband,  disclosed  herself  to 
mortals  through  the  gates  of  the  Mauchegan  horizon  ;  when 
the  renowned  Don  Quixote,"  &c. 

How  happily  already  is  the  abstraction 
from  the  senses,  from  observation,  and  the 
consequent  confusion  of  the  judgment,  mar- 
ked in  this  description  !  The  knight  is  de- 
scribing objects  immediate  to  his  senses  and 
sensations  without  borrowing  a  single  trait 
from  either.  Would  it  be  difficult  to  find  pa- 
rallel descriptions  in  Dryden's  plays  and  in 
those  of  his  successors  ? 

C.  3.  The  host  is  here  happily  conceived  as 
one  who  from  his  past  life  as  a  sharper,  was 
capable  of  entering  into  and  humouring  the 
knight,  and  so  perfectly  in  character,  that  he 


LECTURE  VIII.  123 

precludes  a  considerable  source  of  improba- 
bility in  the  future  narrative,  by  enforcing 
upon  Don  Quixote  the  necessity  of  taking- 
money  with  him. 

C.  3.  "  Ho,  there,  whoever  thou  art,  rash  knight,  that  ap- 
proachest  to  touch  the  arms  of  the  most  valorous  adventurer 
that  ever  girded  sword,"  &c. 

Don  Quixote's  high  eulogiums  on  himself — 
"  the  most  valorous  adventurer  !"— butitis  not 
himself  that  he  has  before  him,  but  the  idol  of 
his  imagination,  the  imaginary  being  whom  he 
is  acting.  And  this,  that  it  is  entirely  a  third 
person,  excuses  his  heart  from  the  otherwise 
inevitable  charge  of  selfish  vanity  ;  and  so  by 
madness  itself  he  preserves  our  esteem,  and 
renders  those  actions  natural  by  which  he,  the 
first  person,  deserves  it. 

C.  4.  Andres  and  his  master. 

The  manner  in  which  Don  Quixote  redressed 
this  wrong,  is  a  picture  of  the  true  revolution- 
ary passion  in  its  first  honest  state,  while  it  is 
yet  only  a  bewilderment  of  the  understanding. 
You  have  a  benevolence  limitless  in  its  prayers, 
which  are  in  fact  aspirations  towards  omnipo- 
tence ;  but  between  it  and  beneficence  the 
bridge  of  judgment— that  is,  of  measurement 
of  personal  power — intervenes,  and  must  be 
passed.  Otherwise  you  will  be  bruised  by  the 
leap  into  the  chasm,  or  be  drowned  in  the 
revolutionary  river,  and  drag  others  with  you 
to  the  same  fate. 


124  COURSE  OF  Li:cTURi:s. 

C.  4.  Mercliants  of  Toledo. 

When  they  were  come  so  near  as  to  be  seen  and  heard, 
Don  Quixote  raised  his  voice,  and  with  arrogant  air  cried 
out:  "  Let  the  whole  world  stand;  if  tlie  whole  world  does 
not  confess  that  there  is  not  in  the  whole  world  a  damsel  more 
beautiful  than,"  &c. 

Now  mark  the  presumption  which  follows 
the  self-complacency  of  the  last  act !  That 
was  an  honest  attempt  to  redress  a  real  wrong  ; 
this  is  an  arbitrary  determination  to  enforce  a 
Brissotine  or  Rousseau's  ideal  on  all  his  fellow 
creatures. 

Let  the  whole  world  stand  ! 

*  If  there  had  been  any  experience  in  proof  of 
the  excellence  of  our  code,  where  would  be 
our  superiority  in  this  enlightened  age?' 

"  No!  the  business  is  that  without  seeing  her,  you  believe, 
confess,  affirm,  swear,  and  maintain  it ;  and  if  not,  I  challenge 
you  all  to  battle.^'* 

Next  see  the  persecution  and  fury  excited 
by  opposition  however  moderate !  The  only 
words  listened  to  are  those,  that  without  their 
context  and  their  conditionals,  and  transformed 
into  positive  assertions,  might  give  some  sha- 
dow of  excuse  for  the  violence  shown  !  This 
rich  story  ends,  to  the  compassion  of  the  men 
in  their  senses,  in  a  sound  rib-roasting  of  the 
idealist  by  the  muleteer,  the  mob.  And  happy 
for   thee,  poor   knight !    that  the   mob  were 


*   Donde  no,  coninigo  sois  en  batalla,  yente  descomunal ! 

Ed. 


LECTURE  VIII.  125 

against  thee  !  For  had  they  been  with  thee,  by 
the  change  of  the  moon  and  of  them,  thy  head 
would  have  been  off. 

C.  5.  first  part — The  idealist  recollects  the 
causes  that  had  been  accessary  to  the  reverse 
and  attempts  to  remove  them — too  late.  He 
is  beaten  and  disgraced. 

C.  6.  This  chapter  on  Don  Quixote's  library 
proves  that  the  author  did  not  wish  to  destroy 
the  romances,  but  to  cause  them  to  be  read  as 
romances — that  is,  for  their  merits  as  poetry. 

C.  7.  Among  other  things,  Don  Quixote  told  him,  he 
should  dispose  himself  to  go  with  him  willingly ; — for  some 
time  or  other  such  an  adventure  might  present,  that  an  island 
might  be  won,  in  the  turn  of  a  hand,  and  he  be  left  governor 
thereof. 

At  length  the  promises  of  the  imaginative 
reason  begin  to  act  on  the  plump,  sensual,  ho- 
nest common  sense  accomplice, — butunhappily 
not  in  the  same  person,  and  without  the  copula 
of  the  judgment, — in  hopes  of  the  substantial 
good  things,  of  which  the  former  contemplated 
only  the  glory  and  the  colours. 

C.  7.  Sancho  Panza  went  riding  upon  his  ass,  like  any 
patriarch,  with  his  wallet  and  leathern  bottle,  and  with  a  ve- 
hement desire  to  find  himself  governor  of  the  island  which  his 
master  had  promised  him. 

The  first  relief  from  regular  labour  is  so 
pleasant  to  poor  Sancho ! 

C.  8.  "  I  no  gentleman  !  I  swear  by  the  great  God,  thou 
liest,  as  I  am  a  Christian.      Biscainer  by  land,  gentleman  by 


120  COURSK  OF  LECTURES. 

sea,  g-entleinan  for  the  devil,  and  thou  liest :  look  (hen  it'  thou 
hast  any  thing  else  to  say." 

This  Biscainer  is  an  excellent  image  of  the 
prejudices  and  bigotry  provoked  by  the  ideal- 
ism of  a  speculator.  This  story  happily  detects 
tlie  trick  which  our  imagination  plays  in  the 
description  of  single  combats  :  only  change  the 
preconception  of  the  magnificence  of  the  com- 
batants, and  all  is  gone. 

B.  II.  c.  2.  "  Be  pleased,  my  lord  Don  Quixote,  to  bestow 
upon  me  the  government  of  that  island,"  &c. 

Sancho's  eagerness  for  his  government,  the 
nascent  lust  of  actual  democracy,  or  isocracy  ! 

C.  2.  "  But  tell  me,  on  your  life,  have  you  ever  seen  a  more 
valorous  knight  than  I,  upon  the  whole  face  of  the  known 
earth?  Have  you  read  in  story  of  any  other,  who  has,  or  ever 
had,  more  bravery  in  assailing,  more  breath  in  holding  out,  more 
dexterity  in  wounding,  or  more  address  in  giving  a  fall  ?" — 
'*  The  truth  is,"  answered  Sancho,  *'  that  I  never  read  any 
history  at  all ;  for  I  can  neither  read  nor  write ;  but  what  I 
dare  affirm  is,  that  I  never  served  a  bolder  master,"  &c. 

This  appeal  to  Sancho,  and  Sancho's  an- 
swer are  exquisitely  humorous.  It  is  impos- 
sible not  to  think  of  the  French  bulletins  and 
proclamations.  Remark  the  necessity  under 
which  we  are  of  being  sympathized  with,  fly 
as  high  into  abstraction  as  we  may,  and  how 
constantly  the  imagination  is  recalled  to  the 
ground  of  our  common  humanity  !  And  note  a 
little  further  on,  the  knight's  easy  vaunting 
of  his  balsam,  and  his  quietly  deferring  the 
making  and  application  of  it. 


LECTURE  VIII.  127 

C.  .'J.  The  speech  before  the  goatherds  : 

"  Happy  times  and  happy  ages,"  &c.* 

Note  the  rhythm  of  this,  and  the  admirable 
beauty  and  wisdom  of  the  thoughts  in  them- 
selves, but  the  total  want  of  judgment  in  Don 
Quixote's  addressing  them  to  such  an  audience. 

B.  III.  c.  3.  Don  Quixote's  balsam,  and  the 
vomiting  and  consequent  relief;  an  excellent  hit 
at  panacea  nostrums,  which  cure  the  patient  by 
his  being  himself  cured  of  the  medicine  by 
revolting  nature. 

C.  4.  "  Peace  !  and  have  patience;  the  day  will  come,"  &c. 

The  perpetual  promises  of  the  imagination  ! 

lb.  "  Your  Worship,"  said  Sancho,  "  would  make  a  better 
preacher  than  knight  errant !" 

Exactly  so.     This  is  the  true  moral. 

C.  6.  The  uncommon  beauty  of  the  descrip- 
tion in  the  commencement  of  this  chapter. 
In  truth,  the  whole  of  it  seems  to  put  all  nature 
in  its  heights  and  its  humiliations,  before  us. 

lb.  Sancho's  story  of  the  goats  : 

"  Make  account,  he  carried  them  all  over,"  said  Don 
Quixote,  "  and  do  not  be  going  and  coming  in  this  manner ; 
for  at  this  rate,  you  will  not  have  done  carrying  them  over  in 
a  twelvemonth."  "  How  many  are  passed  already?"  said 
Sancho,  &c. 

Observe  the  happy  contrast  between  the  all- 
generalizing  mind  of  the   mad   knight,  and 

•  Dichosa  edad  y  sighs  dichosos  aquellos,  ^c.     Ed. 


12S  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Sancho's  all-pcirticiilariziiig  memory.  How 
admirable  a  symbol  of  the  dependence  of  all 
copula  on  the  higher  powers  of  the  mind,  with 
the  single  exception  of  the  succession  in  time 
and  the  accidental  relations  of  space.  Men  of 
mere  common  sense  have  no  theoi*y  or  means 
of  making  one  fact  more  important  or  promi- 
nent than  the  rest ;  if  they  lose  one  link,  all  is 
lost.  Compare  Mrs.  Quickly  and  the  Tapster.* 
And  note  also  Sancho's  good  heart,  when  his 
master  is  about  to  leave  him.  Don  Quixote's 
conduct  upon  discovering  the  fuUing-hammers, 
proves  he  was  meant  to  be  in  his  senses.  No- 
thing can  be  better  conceived  than  his  fit  of 
passion  at  Sancho's  laughing,  and  his  sophism 
of  self-justification  by  the  courage  he  had 
shown. 

Sancho  is  by  this  time  cured,  through  expe- 
rience, as  far  as  his  own  errors  are  concerned  ; 
yet  still  is  he  lured  on  by  the  unconquerable 
awe  of  his  master's  superiority,  even  when  he 
is  cheating  him. 

C.  8.  The  adventure  of  the  Galley-slaves. 
I  think  this  is  the  only  passage  of  moment  in 
which  Cervantes  slips  the  mask  of  his  hero, 
and  speaks  for  himself. 

C.  9.  Don  Quixote  desired  to  have  it,  and  bade  him  take 
the  money,  and  keep  it  for  himself.  Sancho  kissed  his  hands 
for  the  favour,  drc. 

Observe  Sancho's  eagerness  to  avail  himself 

*  See  the  Friend,  vol.  iii.  p.  138.     Ed. 


LECTURE  VIII.  129 

of  the  permission  of  his  master,  who,  in  the 
war  sports  of  knight-errantry,  had,  without 
any  selfish  dishonesty,  overlooked  the  meum 
and  tuum.  Sancho's  selfishness  is  modified 
by  his  involuntary  goodness  of  heart,  and  Don 
Quixote's  flighty  goodness  is  debased  by  the 
involuntary  or  unconscious  selfishness  of  his 
vanity  and  self- applause. 

C.  10.  Cardenio  is  the  madman  of  passion, 
who  meets  and  easily  overthrows  for  the  mo- 
ment the  madman  of  imagination.  And  note 
the  contagion  of  madness  of  any  kind,  upon 
Don  Quixote's  interruption  of  Cardenio's  story. 

C.  11.  Perhaps  the  best  specimen  of  San- 
cho's  proverbial izing  is  this  : 

"  And  I  (Don  Q.)  say  again,  they  lie,  and  will  lie  two 
hundred  times  more,  all  who  say,  or  think  her  so."  "  I  nei- 
ther say,  nor  think  so,"  answered  Sancho  ;  "  let  those  who 
say  it,  eat  the  lie,  and  swallow  it  with  their  bread  :  whether 
they  were  guilty  or  no,  they  have  given  an  account  to  God 
before  now  :  I  come  from  my  vineyard,  I  know  nothing ;  I 
am  no  friend  to  inquiring  into  other  men's  lives;  for  he  that 
buys  and  lies  shall  find  the  lie  left  in  his  purse  behind  ;  be- 
sides, naked  was  I  born,  and  naked  I  remain;  I  neither  win 
nor  lose  ;  if  they  were  guilty,  what  is  that  to  me  ?  Many  think 
to  find  bacon,  where  there  is  not  so  much  as  a  pin  to  hang  it 
on  :  but  who  can  hedge  in  the  cuckoo?  Especially,  do  they 
spare  God  himself?" 

lb.  "  And  it  is  no  great  matter,  if  it  be  in  another  hand ; 
for  by  what  I  remember,  Dulcinea  can  neither  write  nor 
read,"  &c. 

The  wonderful  twilight  of  the  mind  !  and 
mark  Cervantes's  courage  in  daring  to  present 

VOL.   I.  K 


J  30  COUKSE  OF  LECTURES. 

it,  and  trust  to  a  distant  posterity  for  an  appre- 
ciation of  its  truth  to  nature. 

P.  II.  B.  III.  c.  9.  Sanclio's  account  of  what 
he  had  seen  on  Clavileno  is  a  counterpart  in  his 
style  to  Don  Quixote's  adventures  in  the  cave 
of  Montesinos.  This  last  is  the  only  impeach- 
ment of  the  knight's  moral  character ;  Cer- 
vantes just  gives  one  instance  of  the  veracity 
failing  before  the  strong  cravings  of  the  ima- 
gination for  something  real  and  external ;  the 
picture  would  not  have  been  complete  without 
this ;  and  yet  it  is  so  well  managed,  that  the 
reader  has  no  unpleasant  sense  of  Don  Quixote 
having  told  a  lie.  It  is  evident  that  he  hardly 
knows  whether  it  was  a  dream  or  not ;  and 
goes  to  the  enchanter  to  inquire  the  real  nature 
of  the  adventure. 

SUMMARY  ON  CERVANTES. 

A  Castilian  of  refined  manners ;  a  gentle- 
man, true  to  religion,  and  true  to  honour. 

A  scholar  and  a  soldier,  and  fought  vuider 
the  banners  of  Don  John  of  Austria,  at  Le- 
panto,  lost  his  arm  and  was  captured. 

Endured  slavery  not  only  with  fortitude,  but 
with  mirth  ;  and  by  the  superiority  of  nature, 
mastered  and  overawed  his  barbarian  owner. 

Finally  ransomed,  he  resumed  his  native 
destiny,  the  awful  task  of  achieving  fame; 
and  for  that  reason  died  poor  and  a  prisoner, 
while  nobles  and  kings  over  their  goblets  of 


LECTURE  Mil.  131 

gold  gave  relish  to  their  pleasures  by  the 
charms  of  his  divine  genius.  He  was  the  in- 
ventor of  novels  for  the  Spaniards,  and  in  his 
Persilis  and  Sigismunda,  the  English  may  find 
the  germ  of  their  Robinson  Crusoe. 

The  world  was  a  drama  to  him.  His  own 
thoughts,  in  spite  of  poverty  and  sickness,  per- 
petuated for  him  the  feelings  of  youth.  He 
painted  only  what  he  knew  and  had  looked 
into,  but  he  knew  and  had  looked  into  much 
indeed  ;  and  his  imagination  was  ever  at  hand 
to  adapt  and  modify  the  world  of  his  experi- 
ence. Of  delicious  love  he  fabled,  yet  with 
stainless  virtue. 


LECTURE  IX. 

ON  THE  DISTINCTIONS  OF  THE  WITTY,  THE  DROLL, 

THE  ODD,  AND  THE  HUMOUROUS  ; 

THE  NATURE  AND  CONSTITUENTS  OF  HUMOUR  ; — 

RABELAIS SWIFT — STERNE. 

I.  Perhaps  the  most  important  of  our  intel- 
lectual operations  are  those  of  detecting  the  dif- 
ference in  similar, and  the  identity  in  dissimilar, 
things.  Out  of  the  latter  operation  it  is  that  wit 
arises ;  and  it,  generically  regarded,  consists  in 
presenting  thoughts  or  images  in  an  unusual 
connection  with  each  other,  for  the  purpose  of 
exciting  pleasure  by  the  surprise.     This  con- 


132  COURSE  OF  LECTUnr.S. 

nection  may  be  real ;    ami  there  is  in  fact  a 
scientific  wit;  though  where  the  object,  con- 
sciously entertained,  is  truth,  and  not  amuse- 
ment, we  commonly  give  it  some  higher  name. 
But  in  wit  }3opular]y  understood,  the  connec- 
tion may  be,  and  for  the  most  part  is,  apparent 
only,  and  transitory  ;  and  this  connection  may 
be  by  thoughts,  or  by  words,  or  by  images. 
The  first  is  our  Butler's  especial  eminence; 
the  second,  Voltaire's;    the  third,  which   we 
oftener  call  fancy,  constitutes  the  larger  and 
more  peculiar  part  of  the  wit  of  Shakspeare. 
You  can  scarcely  turn  to  a  single  speech  of 
Falstaff's  without  finding  instances  of  it.    Nor 
does  wit  always  cease  to  deserve  the  name  by 
being  transient,  or  incapable  of  analysis.     I 
may  add  that  the  wit  of  thoughts  belongs  emi- 
nently to  the  Italians,  that  of  words  to  the 
French,  and  that  of  images  to  the  English. 

II.  Where  the  laughable  is  its  own  end,  and 
neither  inference,  nor  moral  is  intended,  or 
where  at  least  the  writer  M^ould  wish  it  so 
to  appear,  there  arises  what  we  call  drollery. 
The  pure,  unmixed,  ludicrous  or  laughable  be- 
longs exclusively  to  the  understanding,  and 
must  be  presented  under  the  form  of  the  senses  ; 
it  lies  within  the  spheres  of  the  eye  and  the 
ear,  and  hence  is  allied  to  the  fancy.  It  does 
not  appertain  to  the  reason  or  the  moral  sense, 
and  accordingly  is  alien  to  the  imagination. 
I  think  Aristotle  has  already  excellently  de- 
fined the  laughable,  to  yjXorov,  as  consisting  of, 


LECTURE  IX.  133 

or  depending  on,  what  is  out  of  its  proper  time 
and  place,  yet  without  danger  or  pain.  Here 
the  impropriety — to  utottov — is  the  positive  qua- 
lification ;  the  da7igerless7iess — to  o.kiv'^vvov — the 
negative.  Neither  the  understanding  without 
an  object  of  the  senses,  as  for  example,  a  mere 
notional  error,  or  idiocy ; — nor  any  external 
object,  unless  attributed  to  the  understanding, 
can  produce  the  poetically  laughable.  Nay, 
even  in  ridiculous  positions  of  the  body  laugh- 
ed at  by  the  vulgar,  there  is  a  subtle  personi- 
fication always  going  on,  which  acts  on  the, 
perhaps,  unconscious  mind  of  the  spectator  as 
a  symbol  of  intellectual  character.  And  hence 
arises  the  imperfect  and  awkward  effect  of 
comic  stories  of  animals ;  because  although 
the  understanding  is  satisfied  in  them,  the 
senses  are  not.  Hence  too,  it  is,  that  the 
true  ludicrous  is  its  own  end.  When  serious 
satire  commences,  or  satire  that  is  felt  as  seri- 
ous, however  comically  drest,  free  and  genuine 
laughter  ceases;  it  becomes  sardonic.  This 
you  experience  in  reading  Young,  and  also 
not  unfrequently  in  Butler.  The  true  comic 
is  the  blossom  of  the  nettle. 

III.  When  words  or  images  are  placed  in 
unusual  juxta-position  rather  than  connection, 
and  are  so  placed  merely  because  the  juxta- 
position is  unusual— we  have  the  odd  or  the 
grotesque  ;  the  occasional  use  of  which  in  the 
minor  ornaments  of  architecture,  is  an  in- 
teresting problem  for  a  student  in  the  psycho- 
logy of  the  Fine  Arts. 


134  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

IV.  In  the  simply  laughable  there  is  a  mere 
disproportion  between  a  definite  act  and  a 
definite  purpose  or  end,  or  a  disproportion  of 
the  end  itself  to  the  rank  or  circumstances  of 
the  definite  person  ;  but  humour  is  of  more 
difficult  description.  I  must  try  to  define  it  in 
the  first  place  by  its  points  of  diversity  from 
the  former  species.  Humour  does  not,  like 
the  different  kinds  of  wit,  which  is  imper- 
sonal, consist  wholly  in  the  understanding  and 
the  senses.  No  combination  of  thoughts, 
words,  or  images  will  of  itself  constitute  hu- 
mour, unless  some  peculiarity  of  individual 
temperament  and  character  be  indicated  there- 
by, as  the  cause  of  the  same.  Compare  the 
comedies  of  Congreve  with  the  FalstafF  in 
Henry  IV.  or  with  Sterne's  Corporal  Trim, 
Uncle  Toby,  and  Mr.  Shandy,  or  with  some 
of  Steele's  charming  papers  in  the  Tatler, 
and  you  will  feel  the  difference  better  than  I 
can  express  it.  Thus  again,  (to  take  an  in- 
stance from  the  different  works  of  the  same 
writer),  in  Smollett's  Strap,  his  Lieutenant 
Bowling,  his  Morgan  the  honest  Welshman, 
and  his  Matthew  Bramble,  we  have  exquisite 
humour, — while  in  his  Peregrine  Pickle  we 
find  an  abundance  of  drollery,  which  too  often 
degenerates  into  mere  oddity ;  in  short,  we 
feel  that  a  number  of  things  are  put  together 
to  counterfeit  humour,  but  that  there  is  no 
growth  from  within.  And  this  indeed  is  the 
origin  of  the  word,  derived  from  the  humoral 


LECTURE  IX.  135 

pathology,  and  excellently  described  by  Ben 
Jonson  : 

So  in  every  human  body, 
The  choler,  melancholy,  phlegm,  and  blood, 
By  reason  that  they  flow  continually 
In  some  one  part,  and  are  not  continent, 
Receive  the  name  of  humours.     Now  thus  far 
It  may,  by  metaphor,  apply  itself 
Unto  the  general  disposition  : 
As  when  some  one  peculiar  quality 
Doth  so  possess  a  man,  that  it  doth  draw 
All  his  effects,  his  spirits,  and  his  powers. 
In  their  confluctions,  all  to  run  one  way. 
This  may  be  truly  said  to  be  a  humour.* 

Hence  we  may  explain  the  congeniality  of 
humour  with  pathos,  so  exquisite  in  Sterne 
and  Smollett,  and  hence  also  the  tender  feeling 
which  we  always  have  for,  and  associate  with, 
the  humours  or  hobby-horses  of  a  man.  First, 
we  respect  a  humourist,  because  absence  of 
interested  motive  is  the  ground-work  of  the 
character,  although  the  imagination  of  an  inte- 
rest may  exist  in  the  individual  himself,  as  if 
a  remarkably  simple-hearted  man  should  pride 
himself  on  his  knowledge  of  the  world,  and  how 
well  he  can  manage  it : — and  secondly,  there 
always  is  in  a  genuine  humour  an  acknowledg- 
ment of  the  hollowness  and  farce  of  the  world, 
and  its  disproportion  to  the  godlike  within  us. 
And  it  follows  immediately  from  this,  that 
whenever   particular   acts   have  reference   to 

*  Every  Man  Out  Of  His  Humour.     Prologue. 


130  COUKSK  OF  LECTURES, 

particular  selfisli  motives,  tlie  Inimourous  bursts 
into  the  indignant  and  abhorring  ;  \vhilst  all 
follies  not  selfish  are  pardoned  or  palliated. 
The  danger  of  this  habit,  in  respect  of  pure 
morality,  is  strongly  exemplified  in  Sterne. 

This  would  be  enough,  and  indeed  less  than 
this  has  passed,  for  a  sufficient  account  of 
humour,  if  we  did  not  recollect  that  not  every 
predominance  of  character,  even  where  not 
precluded  by  the  moral  sense,  as  in  criminal 
dispositions,  constitutes  what  we  mean  by  a 
humourist,  or  the  presentation  of  its  produce, 
humour.  What  then  is  it  ?  Is  it  manifold?  Or 
is  there  some  one  hiunorific  point  common  to 
all  that  can  be  called  humourous?— I  am  not 
prepared  to  answer  this  fully,  even  if  my  time 
permitted;  but  I  think  there  is; — and  that  it 
consists  in  a  certain  reference  to  the  general 
and  the  universal,  by  which  the  finite  great  is 
brought  into  identity  with  the  little,  or  the  little 
with  the  finite  great,  so  as  to  make  both  no- 
thing in  comparison  with  the  infinite.  The 
little  is  made  great,  and  the  great  little,  in 
order  to  destroy  both  ;  because  all  is  equal  in 
contrast  with  the  infinite.  "  It  is  not  without 
reason,  brother  Toby,  that  learned  men  write 
dialogues  on  long  noses."*  I  would  suggest, 
therefore,  that  whenever  a  finite  is  contem- 
plated in  reference  to  the  infinite,  whether  con- 
sciously or  unconsciously,  humour  essentially 

*  Tiist.  Sh.  Vol.  iii.  c.  37. 


LECTURE  IX.  .  137 

arises.  In  the  highest  humour,  at  least,  there 
is  always  a  reference  to,  and  a  connection 
with,  some  general  power  not  finite,  in  the 
form  of  some  finite  ridiculously  disproportion- 
ate in  our  feelings  to  that  of  which  it  is,  never- 
theless, the  representative,  or  by  which  it  is  to 
be  displayed.  Humourous  writers,  therefore, 
as  Sterne  in  particular,  delight,  after  much 
preparation,  to  end  in  nothing,  or  in  a  direct 
contradiction. 

That  there  is  some  truth  in  this  definition, 
or  origination  of  humonr,  is  evident ;  for  you 
cannot  conceive  a  humourous  man  who  does  not 
give  some  disproportionate  generality,  or  even 
a  imiversality  to  his  hobby-horse,  as  is  the  case 
with  Mr.  Shandy ;  or  at  least  there  is  an 
absence  of  any  interest  but  what  arises  from 
the  humour  itself,  as  in  my  Uncle  Toby,  and 
it  is  the  idea  of  the  soul,  of  its  undefined  capa- 
city and  dignity,  that  gives  the  sting  to  any 
absorption  of  it  by  any  one  pursuit,  and  this 
not  in  respect  of  the  humourist  as  a  mere 
member  of  society  for  a  particular,  however 
mistaken,  interest,  but  as  a  man. 

The  English  humour  is  the  most  thoughtful, 
the  Spanish  the  most  etherial — the  most  ideal 
— of  modern  literature.  Amongst  the  classic 
ancients  there  was  little  or  no  humour  in  the 
foregoing  sense  of  the  term.  Socrates,  or  Plato 
under  his  name,  gives  some  notion  of  humour 
in  the  Banquet,  when  he  argues  that  tragedy 
and  comedy  rest  upon  the  same  ground.     But 


138  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

liumour  properly  took  its  rise  in  the  middle 
ages  ;  and  the  Devil,  the  Vice  of  the  mys- 
teries, incorporates  the  modern  humour  in  its 
elements.  It  is  a  spirit  measured  by  dispro- 
portionate finites.  The  Devil  is  not,  indeed, 
perfectly  humourous  ;  but  that  is  only  because 
he  is  the  extreme  of  all  humour. 


Rabelais.* 
Born  at  Chinon,  1483-4.— Died  1553. 

One  cannot  help  regretting  that  no  friend  of 
Rabelais,  (and  surely  friends  he  must  have 
had),  has  left  an  authentic  account  of  him. 
His  buffoonery  was  not  merely  Brutus'  rough 
stick,  which  contained  a  rod  of  gold ;  it  was 
necessary  as  an  amulet  against  the  monks  and 
bigots.  Beyond  a  doubt,  he  was  among  the 
deepest  as  well  as  boldest  thinkers  of  his  age. 
Never  was  a  more  plausible,  and  seldom,  I  am 
persuaded,  a  less  appropriate  line  than  the 
thousand  times  quoted, 

Rabelais  laughing  in  his  easy  chair — 

of  Mr.  Pope.  The  caricature  of  his  filth  and 
zanyism  proves  how  fully  he  both  knew  and  felt 
the  danger  in  which  he  stood.    I  could  write  a 

*  No  note  remains  of  that  part  of  this  Lecture  which  treated 
of  Rabelais.  This  seems,  therefore,  a  convenient  place  for 
the  reception  of  some  remarks  written  by  Mr.  C.  in  Mr.  Gill- 
man's  copy  of  Rabelais,  about  the  year  1825.  See  Table 
Talk,  vol.  i.  p.  177.     Ed. 


LECTURE  IX.  139 

treatise  in  proof  and  praise  of  the  morality  and 
moral  elevation  of  Rabelais'  work  which  would 
make  the  church  stare  and  the  conventicle 
groan,  and  yet  should  be  the  truth  and  nothing 
but  the  truth.  I  class  Rabelais  withlhe  crea- 
tive minds  of  the  world,  Shakspeare,  Dante, 
Cervantes,  &c. 

All  Rabelais'  personages  are  phantasmagoric 
allegories,  but  Panurge  above  all.  He  is 
throughout  the  Travovpyia, — the  wisdom,  that  is, 
the  cunning  of  the  human  animal, — the  under- 
standing, as  the  faculty  of  means  to  purposes 
without  ultimate  ends,  in  the  most  comprehen- 
sive sense,  and  including  art,  sensuous  fancy, 
and  all  the  passions  of  the  understanding.  It 
is  impossible  to  read  Rabelais  without  an  ad- 
miration mixed  with  wonder  at  the  depth  and 
extent  of  his  learning,  his  multifarious  know- 
ledge, and  original  observation  beyond  what 
books  could  in  that  age  have  supplied  him 
with. 

B.  III.  c.  9.  How  Panurge  asketh  counsel  of  Pantagruel, 
whether  he  should  marry,  yea  or  no. 

Note  this  incomparable  chapter.  Pantagruel 
stands  for  the  reason  as  contradistinguished 
from  the  understanding  and  choice,  that 
is,  from  Panurge ;  and  the  humour  consists 
in  the  latter  asking  advice  of  the  former  on  a 
subject  in  which  the  reason  can  only  give 
the  inevitable  conclusion,  the  syllogistic  ergo^ 
from  the  premisses  provided  by  tlie   under- 


140  COURSE  OI    LECTURES. 

standing  itself,  which  puts  each  case  so  as  of 
necessity  to  predetermine  the  verdict  thereon. 
This  chapter,  independently  of  the  allegory,  is 
an  exquisite  satire  on  the  spirit  in  which 
people  commonly  ask  advice. 


Swift.* 
Born  in  Dublin,  1067.— Died  1745. 

In  Swift's  writings  there  is  a  false  misan- 
thropy grounded  upon  an  exclusive  contem- 
plation of  the  vices  and  follies  of  mankind,  and 
this  misanthropic  tone  is  also  disfigured  or 
brutalized  by  his  obtrusion  of  physical  dirt 
and  coarseness.  1  think  Gulliver's  Travels 
the  great  work  of  Swift.  In  the  voyages  to 
Lilliput  and  Brobdingnag  he  displays  the  little- 
ness and  moral  contemptibility  of  human 
nature ;  in  that  to  t!:e  Houyhnhnms  he  repre- 
sents the  disgusting  spectacle  of  man  with  the 
understanding  only,  without  the  reason  or  the 
moral  feeling,  and  in  his  horse  he  gives  the 
misanthropic  ideal  of  man— that  is,  a  being 
virtuous  from  rule  and  duty,  but  untouched  by 
the  principle  of  love. 

*  From  Mr.  Green's  note.     Ed. 


LECTURK  iX.  141 


Sterne. 
Born  at  Clonmel,  1713.— Died  1708. 

With  regard  to  Sterne,  and  the  charge  of 
licentiousness  which  presses  so  seriously  upon 
his  character  as  a  writer,  I  would  remark  that 
there  is  a  sort  of  know  ingness,  the  wit  of  which 
depends — 1st,  on  the  modesty  it  gives  pain  to  ; 
or,  2dly,  on  the  innocence  and  innocent  igno- 
rance over  which  it  triumphs  ;   or,  3dly,  on  a 
certain  oscillation  in  the  individual's  own  mind 
between  the  remaining  good  and  the  encroach- 
ing evil  of  his  nature — a  sort  of  dallying  with 
the  devil — a  fluxionary  act  of  combining  cou- 
rage and  cowardice,  as  when  a  man  sn lifts  a 
candle  with  his  fingers  for  the  first  time,  or 
better  still,  perhaps,  like  that  trembling  daring 
with  which  a  child  touches  a  hot  tea  urn,  be- 
cause it  has  been  forbidden  ;  so  that  the  mind 
has  in  its  own  white  and  black  anoel  the  same 
or  similar  amusement,  as   may  be  supposed 
to  take  place  between  an  old  debauchee  and 
a  prude,— she  feeling  resentment,  on  the  one 
hand,  from  a  prudential  anxiety  to   preserve 
appearances  and  have  a  character,  and,  on  the 
other,  an  inward  sympathy  with  the  enemy. 
We  have  only  to   suppose  society  innocent, 
and  then  nine-tenths  of  this  sort  of  wit  would 
be  like  a  stone  that  falls  in  snow,  making  no 


142  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

sound  because  excitinp^  no  resistance ;  the  re- 
mainder rests  on  its  being  an  offence  against 
the  good  manners  of  human  nature  itself. 

This  source,  unworthy  as  it  is,  may  doubtless 
be  combined  with  wit,  drollery,  fancy,   and 
even  humour,  and  we  have  only  to  regret  the 
misalliance ;   but  that  the  latter  are  quite  dis- 
tinct from  the  former,  may  be  made  evident 
by  abstracting  in  our  imagination  the  morality 
of  the  characters  of  Mr.  Shandy,  my  Uncle 
Toby,   and  Trim,  which   are  all  antagonists 
to  this  spurious  sort  of  wit,  from  the  rest  of 
Tristram  Shandy,  and  by  supposing,  instead 
of  them,  the  presence  of  two  or  three  callous 
debauchees.     The  result  will  be  pure  disgust. 
Sterne  cannot  be  too  severely  censured  for  thus 
using  the  best  dispositions  of  our  nature  as  the 
panders  and  condiments  for  the  basest. 
The  excellencies  of  Sterne  consist — 
1.    In    bringing  forward  into  distinct  con- 
sciousness those  minutiae  of  thought  and  feel- 
ing which  appear  trifles,  yet  have  an  impor- 
tance for  the  moment,  and  which  almost  every 
man  feels  in  one  way  or  other.     Thus  is  pro- 
duced the  novelty  of  an  individual  peculiarity, 
together  with  the  interest  of  a  something  that 
belongs   to   our   common    nature.      In   short, 
Sterne  seizes  happily  on  those  points,  in  which 
every  man  is  more  or  less  a  humourist.     And, 
indeed,  to  be  a  little  more  subtle,  the  propen- 
sity to  notice  these  things  does  itself  constitute 
the  humourist,  and  the  superadded  power  of  so 


LECTURE  IX.  143 

presenting  them  to  men  in  general  gives  us  the 
man  of  humour.  Hence  the  difference  of  the 
man  of  humour,  the  effect  of  whose  portraits 
does  not  depend  on  the  felt  presence  of  him- 
self, as  a  humourist,  as  in  the  instances  of 
Cervantes  and  Shakspeare — nay,  of  Rabelais 
too ;  and  of  the  humourist,  the  effect  of  whose 
works  does  very  much  depend  on  the  sense  of 
his  own  oddity,  as  in  Sterne's  case,  and  per- 
haps Swift's;  though  Swift  again  would  require 
a  separate  classification. 

2.  In  the  traits  of  human  nature,  which  so 
easily  assume  a  particular  cast  and  colour 
from  individual  character.  Hence  this  excel- 
lence and  the  pathos  connected  with  it  quickly 
pass  into  humour,  and  form  the  ground  of  it. 
See  particularly  the  beautiful  passage,  so  well 
known,  of  Uncle  Toby's  catching  and  libera- 
ting the  fly  : 

"  Go," — says  he,  one  day  at  dinner,  to  an  overgrown  one 
which  had  buzzed  about  his  nose,  and  tormented  him  cruelly 
all  dinner-time,  and  which,  after  infinite  attempts,  he  had 
caught  at  last,  as  it  flew  by  him ; — "  I'll  not  hurt  thee,"  says 
my  Uncle  Toby,  rising  from  his  chair,  and  going  across  the 
room,  with  the  fly  in  his  hand, — "  I'll  not  hurt  a  hair  of  thy 
head : — Go,"  says  he,  lifting  up  the  sash,  and  opening  his 
hand  as  he  spoke,  to  let  it  escape ; — "  go,  poor  devil,  get  thee 
gone,  why  should  I  hurt  thee?  This  world  is  surely  wide 
enough  to  hold  both  thee  and  me."     Vol.  ii.  ch.  12. 

Observe  in  this  incident  how  individual  cha- 
racter may  be  given  by  the  mere  delicacy  of 
presentation  and  elevation  in  degree  of  a  com- 


144  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

nioii   good  quality,  hmnanily,  which  in   itself 
Mould  not  be  characteristic  at  all. 

.3.  In  Mr.  Shandy's  character, — the  essence  of 
which  is  a  craving  for  sympathy  in  exact  jjro- 
portion  to  the  oddity  and  iinsympathizability 
of  what  he  proposes; — this  coupled  with  an 
instinctive  desire  to  be  at  least  disputed  with, 
or  rather  both  in  one,  to  dispute  and  yet  to 
agree — and  holding  as  worst  of  all — to  acqui- 
esce without  either  resistance  or  sympatliy. 
This  is  charmingly,  indeed,  profoundly  con- 
ceived, and  is  psychologically  and  ethically 
true  of  all  Mr.  Shandies.  Note,  too,  how  the 
contrasts  of  character,  which  are  always  either 
balanced  or  remedied,  increase  the  love  be- 
tween the  brothers. 

4.  No  writer  is  so  happy  as  Sterne  in  the 
unexaggerated  and  truly  natural  representation 
of  that  species  of  slander,  which  consists  in 
gossiping  about  our  neighbours,  as  whetstones 
of  our  moral  discrimination ;  as  if  they  were 
conscience-blocks  which  we  used  in  our  ap- 
prenticeship, in  order  not  to  waste  such  pre- 
cious materials  as  our  own  consciences  in  the 
trimming  and  shaping  of  ourselves  by  self-exa- 
mination : — 

Alas  o'day ! — -had  Mrs.  Shandy  (poor  g'entlewoman  !)  had 
but  her  wish  in  going-  up  to  town  just  to  lie  in  and  come  down 
again  ;  which,  they  say,  she  begged  and  prayed  for  upon  her 
bare  knees,  and  which,  in  my  opinion,  considering  the  fortune 
which  Mr.  Shandy  got  with  her,  was  np  such  mighty  matter 
to  have  complied  with,  the  lady  and  her  babe  might  both  of 
them  have  been  alive  at  this  hour.     Vol.  i.  c.  18. 


LECTURE  IX.  145 

5,  When  you  have  secured  a  man's  likings 

and  prejudices  in  your  favour,  you  may  then 

safely  appeal  to  his  impartial  judgment.     In 

the  following  passage  not  only  is  acute  sense 

shrouded  in  wit,  but  a  life  and  a  character 

are   added   which  exalt  the   whole   into   the 

dramatic  : — ■ 

"  I  see  plainly,  Sir,  by  your  looks'"  (or  as  the  case  happened) 
my  father  would  say — "  that  you  do  not  heartily  subscribe  to 
this  opinion  of  mine — which,  to  those,"  he  would  add,  "  who 
have  not  carefully  sifted  it  to  the  bottom, — I  own  has  an  air 
more  of  fancy  than  of  solid  reasoning  in  it;  and  yet,  my  dear 
Sir,  if '  I  may  presume  to  know  your  character,  I  am  morally 
assured,  I  should  hazard  little  in  stating  a  case  to  you,  not  as 
a  party  in  the  dispute,  but  as  a  judge,  and  trusting  my  appeal 
upon  it  to  your  good  sense  and  candid  disquisition  in  this 
matter;  you  are  a  person  free  from  as  many  narrow  preju- 
dices of  education  as  most  men ;  and,  if  I  may  presume  to 
penetrate  farther  into  you,  of  a  liberality  of  genius  above 
bearing  down  an  opinion,  merely  because  it  wants  friends. 
Your  son, — your  dear  son, — from  whose  sweet  and  open 
temper  you  have  so  much  to  expect, — your  Billy,  Sir  !— 
would  you,  for  the  world,  have  called  him  Judas  ?  Would 
you,  my  dear  Sir,"  he  would  say,  laying  his  hand  upon  your 
breast,  with  the  genteelest  address, — and  in  that  soft  and  ir- 
resistible piar«>  of  voice  which  the  nature  of  the  arguynentum 
ad  ho?nine?n  absolutely  requires, — "  Would  you,  Sir,  if  a  Jew 
of  a  godfather  had  proposed  the  name  for  your  child,  and  of- 
fered you  his  purse  along  with  it,  would  you  have  consented 
to  such  a  desecration  of  him  ?  O  my  God  !"  he  would  say, 
looking  up,  "  if  I  know  your  temper  rightly.  Sir,  you  are  inca- 
pable of  it; — you  would  have  trampled  upon  the  offer; — you 
would  have  thrown  the  temptation  at  the  tempter's  head  with 
abhorrence.  Your  greatness  of  mind  in  this  action,  which  I 
admire,  with  that  generous  contempt  of  money,  which  you 
show  me  in  the  whole  transaction,  is  really  noble  ; — and  what 
renders  it  more  so,  is  the  principle  of  it ; — the  workings  of  a 
parent's  love  upon  the  truth  and  conviction  of  this  very  hypo- 

VOL.  I.  L 


146  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

thesis,  namely,  tliat  were  your  son  called  Jiulas, — the  sordid 
and  treacherous  idea,  so  inseparable  from  the  name,  would  have 
accompanied  him  through  life  like  his  shadow,  and  in  the  end 
made  a  miser  and  a  rascal  of  him,  in  spite,  Sir,  of  your  ex- 
ample."    Vol.  i.  c.  19. 

0.  There  is  great  physiognomic  tact  in 
Sterne.  See  it  particularly  displayed  in  his 
descri})tion  of  Dr.  Slop,  accompanied  with  all 
that  happiest  use  of  drapery  and  attitude, 
M'hich  at  once  give  reality  by  individualizing 
and  vividness  by  unusual,  yet  probable,  com- 
binations:— 

Imagine  to  yourself  a  little  squat,  nncourtly  figure  of  a 
Doctor  Slop,  of  about  four  feet  and  a  half  perpendicular 
height,  with  a  breadth  of  back,  and  a  sesquipedality  of  belly, 
which  might  have  done  honour  to  a  Serjeant  in  the  horse- 
guards. 

*  *  *  « 

Imagine  such  a  one; — for  such  I  say,  were  the  outlines  of 
Dr.  Slop's  figure,  coming  slowly  along,  foot  by  foot,  waddling 
through  the  dirt  upon  the  vertehree  of  a  little  diminutive  pony, 
of  a  pretty  colour — but  of  strength, — alack  !  scarce  able  to 
have  made  an  amble  of  it,  under  such  a  fardel,  had  the  roads 
been  in  an  ambling  condition; — they  were  not.  Imagine  to 
yourself  Obadiah  mounted  upon  a  strong  monster  of  a  coach- 
horse,  pricked  into  a  fidl  gallop,  and  making  all  practicable 
speed  the  adverse  way.     Vol.  ii.  c.  9. 

7.  T  think  there  is  more  humour  in  the 
single  remark,  which  I  have  quoted  before — 
"  Learned  men,  brother  Toby,  don't  write  dia- 
logues upon  long  noses  for  nothing  !" — than  in 
the  whole  Slawkenburghian  tale  that  follows, 
which  is  mere  oddity  interspersed  with  drol- 
lery. 


LECTURE  IX.  147 

8.  Note  Sterne's  assertion  of,  and  faith  in, 
a  moral  good  in  the  characters  of  Trim,  Toby, 
&c.  as  contrasted  with  the  cold  scepticism  of 
motives  which  is  the  stamp  of  the  Jacobin 
spirit.     Vol.  V.  c.  9. 

9.  You  must  bear  in  mind,  in  order  to  do 
justice  to  Rabelais  and  Sterne,  that  by  right 
of  humoristic  universality  each  part  is  essen- 
tially a  whole  in  itself.  Hence  the  digressive 
spirit  is  not  mere  wantonness,  but  in  fact  the 
very  form  and  vehicle  of  their  genius.  The 
connection,  such  as  was  needed,  is  given  by 
the  continuity  of  the  characters. 


Instances  of  different  forms  of  wit,  taken 
largely : 

1.  Why  are  you  reading  romances  at  your  age?" — "  Why, 
I  used  to  be  fond  of  history,  but  I  have  given  it  up, — it  was 
so  grossly  improbable." 

2.  "  Pray,  sir,  do  it !— although  yoa  have  promised  me." 

3.  The  Spartan  mother's — 

"  Return  with,  or  on,  thy  shield." 
"  My  sword  is  too  short!" — "  Take  a  step  forwarder." 

4.  The  Gasconade  : — 

"  I  believe  you,  Sir!  but  you  will  excuse  my  repeating  it 
on  account  of  my  provincial  accent." 

5.  Pasquil  on  Pope  Urban,  who  had  em- 
ployed a  committee  to  rip  up  the  old  errors 
of  his  predecessors. 

Some  one  placed  a  pair  of  spurs  on  the  heels 


148  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

of  the  statue  of  St.  Peter,  and  a  label  from  the 

opposite    statue    of  St.    Paul,    on    the   same 

bridge  ; — 

St.  Paul.  "  Whither  then  are  you  bound?" 

St.  Peter.   *'  I  apprehend  danger  here; — they'll  soon  call 

me  in  question  for  denying  my  Master." 

5*^  Paul.   "  Nay,  then,  I  had  better  be  off  too ;  for  they'll 

question  me  for  having  persecuted  the  Christians,  before  my 

conversion." 

0.  Speaking  of  the  small  German  poten- 
tates, I  dictated  the  phrase, — ojficious  for  equi- 
valents. This  my  amanuensis  wrote,— Jishhio- 
for  elephants; — which,  as  I  observed  at  the 
time,  was  a  sort  of  Noah's  angling,  that  could 
hardly  have  occurred,  except  at  the  commence- 
ment of  the  Deluge. 


LECTURE  X. 

donne — dante  —  milton paradlse  lost. 

Donne.* 
Born  in  London,  1573.— Died,  1()31. 

I. 

With  Donne,  whose  muse  on  dromedary  trots, 
Wreathe  iron  pokers  into  true-love  knots; 
Rhyme's  sturdy  cripple,  fancy's  maze  and  clue, 
Wit's  forge  and  fire-blast,  meaning's  press  and  screw. 

*  Nothing  remains  of  what  was  said  on  Donne  in  this  Lec- 
ture. Here,  therefore,  as  in  previous  like  instances,  the  gap 
is  filled  up  with  some  notes  written  by  Mr.  Coleridge  in  a 
volume  of  Chalmers's  Poets,  belonging  to  Mr.  Gillman.  The 
verses  were  added  in  pencil  to  the  collection  of  commendatory 


LECTURE  X.  149 

II. 

See  lewdness  and  theology  combin'd, — 

A  cynic  and  a  sycophantic  mind  ; 

A  fancy  shar'd  party  per  pale  between 

Death's  heads  and  skeletons  and  Aretine  ! — 

Not  his  peculiar  defect  or  crime, 

But  the  true  current  mintage  of  the  time. 

Such  were  the  establish'd  signs  and  tokens  given 

To  mark  a  loyal  churchman,  sound  and  even, 

Free  from  papistic  and  fanatic  leaven. 

The  wit  of  Donne,  the  wit  of  Butler,  Uie  wit 
of  Pope,  the  wit  of  Congreve,  the  wit  of  Sheri- 
dan— how  many  disparate  things  are  here 
expressed  by  one  and  tlie  same  m  ord,  Wit ! — 
Wonder-exciting  vigour,  intenseness  and  pecu- 
liarity of  thought,  using  at  will  the  almost 
boundless  stores  of  a  capacious  memory,  and 
exercised  on  subjects,  where  we  have  no  right 
to  expect  it — this  is  the  wit  of  Donne  !  The 
four  others  I  am  just  in  the  mood  to  describe 
and  inter-distinguish ; — what  a  pity  that  the 
marginal  space  will  not  let  me  ! 

My  face  in  thine  eye,  thine  in  mine  appears,. 
And  true  plain  hearts  do  in  the  faces  rest ; 
Where  can  w&  find  two  fitter  hemispheres 
Without  sharp  north,  without  declining  west? 

Good-Morrow,  v.  15,  &c. 

The  sense  is ; — Our  mutual  loves  may  in 
many  respects  be  fitly  compared  to  correspond- 

lines;  No.  I.  is  Mr.  C.'s  ;  the  publication  of  No.  II.  I  trust 
the  all-accomplished  author  will,  under  the  circumstances, 
pardon.  Numerous  and  elaborate  notes  by  Mr.  Coleridjj,e  on 
Donne's  Sermons  are  in  existetice,  and  will  be  published  here- 
after.    Ed. 


150  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

ing  hemispheres;  but  as  no  simile  squares 
{riihil  simile  est  idem),  so  here  the  simile  fails, 
for  there  is  nothing  in  our  loves  that  corres- 
ponds to  the  cold  north,  or  the  declining  west, 
which  in  two  hemispheres  must  necessarily  be 
supposed.  But  an  ellipse  of  such  length  will 
scarcely  rescue  the  line  from  the  charge  of  non- 
sense or  a  bull.  January,  1829. 
Woman's  constancy. 

A  misnomer.     The  title  ought  to  be — 

Mutual  Inconstancy. 

Whether  both  ih'  Indias  of  spice  and  mine,  &c. 

Sun  Rising,  v.  17. 

And  see  at  night  thy  western  land  of  mine,  &c. 

Progress  of  the  Soul,  1  Song,  2.  st. 

This  use  of  the  word  mi7ie  specifically  for 
mines  of  gold,  silver,  or  precious  stones,  is,  1 
believe,  peculiar  to  Donne. 


Dante. 

Born  at  Florence,  1265.— Died,  1.321. 

As  I  remarked  in  a  former  Lecture  on  a 
different  subject  (for  subjects  the  most  diverse 
in  literature  have  still  their  tangents),  the 
Gothic  character,  and  its  good  and  evil  fruits, 
appeared  less  in  Italy  than  in  any  other  part 
of  European  Christendom.  There  was  accord- 
ingly much  less  romance,  as  that  word  is  com- 
monly  understood ;    or,   perhaps,  more  truly 


LECTURE  X.  151 

stated,  there  was  romance  instead  of  chivalry. 
In  Italy,  an  earlier  imitation  of,  and  a  more 
evident  and  intentional  blending  with,  the  Latin 
literature  took  place  than  elsewhere.  The 
operation  of  the  feudal  system,  too,  was  incal- 
culably weaker,  of  that  singular  chain  of  inde- 
pendent interdependents,  the  principle  of  which 
was  a  confederacy  for  the  preservation  of  indi- 
vidual, consistently  with  general,  freedom.  In 
short,  Italy,  in  the  time  of  Dante,  was  an  after- 
birth of  eldest  Greece,  a  renewal  or  a  reflex  of 
the  old  Italy  nnder  its  kings  and  first  Roman 
consuls,  a  net-work  of  free  little  republics,  with 
the  same  domestic  feuds,  civil  wars,  and  party 
spirit, — the  same  vices  and  virtues  produced 
on  a  similarly  narrow  theatre, — the  existing 
state  of  things  being,  as  in  all  small  demo- 
cracies, under  the  working  and  direction  of 
certain  individuals,  to  whose  will  even  the  laws 
were  swayed ; — whilst  at  the  same  time  the 
singular  spectacle  was  exhibited  amidst  all 
this  confusion  of  tlie  flourishing  of  commerce, 
and  the  protection  and  encouragement  of  let- 
ters and  arts.  Never  was  the  commercial  spirit 
so  well  reconciled  to  the  nobler  principles  of 
social  polity  as  in  Florence.  It  tended  there 
to  union  and  permanence  and  elevation, — not 
as  the  overbalance  of  it  in  England  is  now 
doing,  to  dislocation,  change  and  moral  de- 
gradation. The  intensest  patriotism  reigned  in 
these  communities,  but  confined  and  attached 
exclusively  to  the  snuiU  locality  of  the  patriot's 


152  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

birth  and  residence ;  Avhereas  in  the  true 
Gothic  feudalism,  country  was  nothing  but 
the  preservation  of  personal  independence. 
But  then,  on  the  other  hand,  as  a  counter- 
balance to  these  disuniting  elements,  there  m  as 
in  Dante's  Italy,  as  in  Greece,  a  much  greater 
uniformity  of  religion  common  to  all  than 
amongst  the  northern  nations. 

Upon  these  hints  the  history  of  the  repub- 
lican seras  of  ancient  Greece  and  modern 
Italy  ought  to  be  written.  There  are  three 
kinds  or  stages  of  historic  narrative; — 1.  that 
of  the  annalist  or  chronicler,  who  deals  merely 
in  facts  and  events  arranged  in  order  of  time, 
having  no  principle  of  selection,  no  plan  of 
arrangement,  and  whose  work  properly  consti- 
tutes a  supplement  to  the  poetical  writings  of 
romance  or  heroic  legends: — 2.  that  of  the 
writer  who  takes  his  stand  on  some  moral 
point,  and  selects  a  series  of  events  for  the  ex- 
press purpose  of  illustrating  it,  and  in  whose 
hands  the  narrative  of  the  selected  events  is 
modified  by  the  principle  of  selection  ;— as 
Thucydides,  whose  object  was  to  describe  the 
evils  of  democratic  and  aristocratic  partizan- 
ships ; — or  Polybius,  whose  design  was  to  show 
the  social  benefits  resulting  from  the  triumph 
and  grandeur  of  Rome,  in  public  institutions 
and  military  discipline ; — or  Tacitus,  whose 
secret  aim  was  to  exhibit  the  pressure  and 
corruptions  of  despotism ;— in  all  which  writers 
and  others  like  them,  the  ground-object  of  the 


LECTURE  X.  153 

historian  colours  with  artificial  lights  the  facts 
which  he  relates  : — 3.  and  which  in  idea  is  the 
grandest— the  most  truly  founded  in  philo- 
sophy— there  is  the  Herodotean  history,  which 
is  not  composed  with  reference  to  any  parti- 
cular causes,  but  attempts  to  describe  human 
nature  itself  on  a  great  scale  as  a  portion  of 
the  drama  of  providence,  the  free  will  of  man 
resisting  the  destiny  of  events, — for  the  indi- 
viduals often  succeeding  against  it,  but  for  the 
race  always  yielding  to  it,  and  in  the  resistance 
itself  invariably  affording  means  towards  the 
completion  of  the  ultimate  result.  Mitford's 
history  is  a  good  and  useful  work  ;  but  in  his 
zeal  against  democratic  government,  Mitford 
forgot,  or  never  saw,  that  ancient  Greece  was 
not,  nor  ought  ever  to  be  considered,  a  perma- 
nent thing,  but  that  it  existed,  in  the  dispo- 
sition of  providence,  as  a  proclaimer  of  ideal 
truths,  and  that  everlasting  proclamation  being 
made,  that  its  functions  were  naturally  at  an 
end. 

However,  in  the  height  of  such  a  state  of 
society  in  Italy,  Dante  was  born  and  flourished ; 
and  was  himself  eminently  a  picture  of  the  age 
in  which  he  lived.  But  of  more  importance 
even  than  this,  to  a  right  understanding  of 
Dante,  is  the  consideration  that  the  scholastic 
philosophy  was  then  at  its  acme  even  in  itself; 
but  more  especially  in  Italy,  where  it  never 
prevailed  so  exclusively  as  northward  of  the 
Alps.    It  is  impossible  to  understand  the  geniu;? 


154  COURSE  OV  LECTUUES. 

of  Dtiiite,  and  ditiicult  to  luiderstaiKl  his  poem, 
without  some  knowledge  of  the  characters, 
studies,  and  writings  of  the  schoohnen  of  the 
twelfth,  thirteenth,  and  fourteenth  centuries. 
For  Dante  was  the  living  link  between  religion 
and  philosophy  ;  he  philosophized  the  religion 
and  christianized  the  philosophy  of  Italy  ;  and, 
in  this  poetic  union  of  religion  and  philosophy, 
he  became  the  ground  of  transition  into  the 
mixed  Platonism  and  Aristotelianism  of  the 
Schools,  under  which,  by  numerous  minute 
articles  of  faith  and  ceremony,  Christianity 
became  a  craft  of  hair-splitting,  and  was  ulti- 
mately degraded  into  a  complete  fetisch  wor- 
ship, divorced  from  philosophy,  and  made  up 
of  a  faith  without  thought,  and  a  credulity 
directed  by  passion.  Afterwards,  indeed,  phi- 
losophy revived  under  condition  of  defending 
this  very  superstition ;  and,  in  so  doing,  it 
necessarily  led  the  way  to  its  subversion,  and 
that  in  exact  proportion  to  the  influence  of  the 
philosophic  schools.  Hence  it  did  its  work 
most  completely  in  Germany,  then  in  England, 
next  in  France,  then  in  Spain,  least  of  all  in 
Italy.  We  must,  therefore,  take  the  poetry 
of  Dante  as  christianized,  but  without  the 
further  Gothic  accession  of  proper  chivalry. 
It  was  at  a  somewhat  later  period,  that  the 
importations  from  the  East,  through  the  Ve- 
netian commerce  and  the  crusading  arma- 
ments, exercised  a  peculiarly  strong  influence 
on  Italy. 


LECTURE  X.  155 

In    studying    Dante,    therefore,    we    must 
consider  carefully  the   difterences   produced, 
first,  by  allegory  being  substituted  for  poly- 
theism ;  and  secondly  and  mainly,  by  the  op- 
position of  Christianity  to  the  spirit  of  pagan 
Greece,  which  receiving  the  very  names  of  its 
gods  from  Egypt,  soon  deprived  them  of  all 
that  was  universal.     The  Greeks  changed  the 
ideas  into  finites,  and  these  finites  into  an- 
thropomorphic or  forms  of  men.     Hence  their 
religion,  their  poetry,  nay,  their  very  pictures, 
became  statuesque.     With  them  the  form  was 
the  end.     The  reverse  of  this  was  the  natural 
effect  of  Christianity ;   in  which  finites,  even 
the  human  form,  must,  in  order  to  satisfy  the 
mind,  be  brought  into  connexion  with,  and  be 
in  fact  symbolical  of,  the  infinite;  and  must 
be  considered  in  some  enduring,  however  sha- 
dowy and  indistinct,  point  of  view,  as  the  ve- 
hicle or  representative  of  moral  truth. 

Hence  resulted  two  great  effects;  a  com- 
bination of  poetry  with  doctrine,  and,  by  turn- 
ins:  the  mind  inward  on  its  own  essence  instead 
of  letting  it  act  only  on  its  outward  circum- 
stances and  communities,  a  combination  of 
poetry  with  sentiment.  And  it  is  this  inward- 
ness or  subjectivity,  which  principally  and 
most  fundamentally  distinguishes  all  the  classic 
from  all  the  modern  poetry.  Compare  the 
passage  in  the  Iliad  (Z'.  vi.  1 19 — 236.)  in  which 
Diomed  and  Glaucus  change  arms, — 


loG  COUKSK  OF  LLCTUKES. 

XtipaQ  r  aWijXioy  Xa/^tVjjj'  kciI  TrirTTwrravro — 

They  took  each  other  by  the  hand,  and  pledged  friendship — 

with  the  scene  in  Ariosto  (Orhmdo  Furioso, 
c.  i.  St.  20-22.),  where  Rinaldo  and  Ferrauto 
fight  and  afterwards  make  it  up  :  — 

Al  Pagan  la  proposta  non  dispiacque  : 
Cos!  fu  differita  la  tenzone ; 
E  tal  tregua  tra  lor  subito  nacque, 
Si  r  odio  e  r  ira  va  in  oblivi'one, 
Che  '1  Pagano  al  partir  dalle  fresclie  acque 
Non  lascio  a  piede  il  buon  figliuol  d'  Anione : 
Con  preghi  invita,  e  al  fin  lo  toglie  in  groppa, 
E  per  r  orrae  d'  Angelica  galoppa. 

Here  Homer  would  have  left  it.  But  the 
Christian  poet  has  his  own  feelings  to  express, 
and  goes  on  : — 

Oh  gran  bonta  de'  cavalieri  antiqui ! 
Eran  rivali,  eran  di  fe  diversi, 
E  si  sentian  degli  aspri  colpi  iniqui 
Per  tutta  la  persona  anco  dolersi ; 
E  pur  per  selve  oscure  e  calli  obbliqui 
Insieme  van  senza  sospetto  aversi ! 

And  here  you  will  observe,  that  the  reaction  of 
Ariosto's  own  feelings  on  the  image  or  act  is 
more  fore-grounded  (to  use  a  painter's  phrase) 
than  the  image  or  act  itself. 

The  two  different  modes  in  which  the  ima- 
gination is  acted  on  by  the  ancient  and  modern 
poetry,  may  be  illustrated  by  the  parallel 
effects  caused  by  the  contemplation  of  the 
Greek  or  Roman-Greek  architecture,  com- 
pared with  the  Gothic.  In  the  Pantheon,  the 
whole  is  perceived  in  a  perceived  harmony  with 


LECTURE  X.  157 

the  parts  which  compose  it ;  and  generally  you 
will  remember  that  where  the  parts  preserve 
any  distinct  individuality,  there  simple  beauty, 
or  beauty  simply,  arises ;  but  where  the  parts 
melt  undistinguished  into  the  whole,  there 
majestic  beauty,  or  majesty,  is  the  result.  In 
York  Minster,  the  parts,  the  grotesques,  are  in 
themselves  very  sharply  distinct  and  separate, 
and  this  distinction  and  separation  of  the  parts 
is  counterbalanced  only  by  the  multitude  and 
variety  of  those  parts,  by  which  the  attention  is 
bewildered ; — whilst  the  whole,  or  that  there 
is  a  whole  produced,  is  altogether  a  feeling  in 
which  the  several  thousand  distinct  impressions 
lose  themselves  as  in  a  universal  solvent.  Hence 
in  a  Gothic  cathedral,  as  in  a  prospect  from 
a  mountain's  top,  there  is,  indeed,  a  unity,  an 
awful  oneness ; — but  it  is,  because  all  distinc- 
tion evades  the  eye.  And  just  such  is  the  dis- 
tinction between  the  Antigone  of  Sophocles 
and  the  Hamlet  of  Shakspeare. 

The  Divina  Commedia  is  a  system  of  moral, 
political,  and  theological  truths,  with  arbi- 
trary personal  exemplifications,  which  are  not, 
in  my  opinion,  allegorical.  I  do  not  even 
feel  convinced  that  the  punishments  in  the  In- 
ferno are  strictly  allegorical.  I  rather  take 
them  to  have  been  in  Dante's  mind  quasi-^\]e- 
gorical,  or  conceived  in  analogy  to  pure  alle- 
gory. 

I  have  said,  that  a  combination  of  poetry 
with  doctrines,  is  one  of  the  characteristics  of 


1">8  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

the  Christian  iiiiise;  but  I  think  Dante  has 
not  succeeded  in  effecting  this  combination 
nearly  so  well  as  Milton. 

This  comparative  failure  of  Dante,  as  also 
some  other  peculiarities  of  his  mind,  in  malam 
partem,  must  be  innnediately  attributed  to 
the  state  of  North  Italy  in  his  time,  which  is 
vividly  represented  in  Dante's  life  ;  a  state 
of  intense  democratical  partizanship,  in  which 
an  exaggerated  importance  was  attached  to  in- 
dividuals, and  which  whilst  it  afforded  a  vast 
field  for  the  intellect,  opened  also  a  boundless 
arena  •  for  the  passions,  and  in  which  envy, 
jealousy,  hatred,  and  other  malignant  feelings, 
could  and  did  assume  the  form  of  patriotism, 
even  to  the  individual's  own  conscience. 

All  this  common,  and,  as  it  were,  natural 
partizanship,  was  aggravated  and  coloured  by 
the  Guelf  and  Ghibelline  factions;  and,  in 
part  explanation  of  Dante's  adherence  to  the 
latter,  you  must  particularly  remark,  that  the 
Pope  had  recently  territorialized  his  authority 
to  a  great  extent,  and  that  this  increase  of  ter- 
ritorial power  in  the  church,  was  by  no  means 
the  same  beneficial  movement  for  the  citizens 
of  free  republics,  as  the  parallel  advance  in 
other  countries  was  for  those  who  groaned  as 
vassals  under  the  oppression  of  the  circumja- 
cent baronial  castles.* 

*  Mr.  Coleridge  here  notes :  **  I  will,  if  I  can,  here  make 
an  historical  movement,  and  pay  a  proper  compliment  to  Mr. 
Hallam."     Ed. 


LECTURE  X.  159 

By  way  of  preparation  to  a  satisfactory  pe- 
rusal of  the  Diviiia  Commedia,  I  will  now  pro- 
ceed to  state  what  I  consider  to  be  Dante's 
chief  excellences  as  a  poet.    And  I  begin  with 

I.  Style — the  vividness,  logical  connexion, 
strength  and  energy  of  which  cannot  be  sur- 
passed. In  this  I  think  Dante  superior  to 
Milton  ;  and  his  style  is  accordingly  more  imi- 
table  than  Milton's,  and  does  to  this  day  exer- 
cise a  greater  influence  on  the  literature  of  his 
country.  You  cannot  read  Dante  without 
feeling  a  gush  of  manliness  of  thought  within 
you.  Dante  was  very  sensible  of  his  own  ex- 
cellence in  this  particular,  and  speaks  of  poets 
as  guardians  of  the  vast  armory  of  language, 
which  is  the  intermediate  something  between 
matter  and  spirit : — 

Or  se'  tu  quel  Virgilio,  e  quella  fonte, 
Che  spande  di  parlar  si  largo  fiume  ? 
Risposi  lui  con  vcrgognosa  fronte. 

O  degli  altri  poeti  onore  e  lume, 
Vagliami  '1  lungo  studio  e  '1  grande  amore, 
Che  m'  han  fatto  cercar  lo  tuo  volume. 

Tu  se'  lo  mio  maestro,  e  '1  mio  autore ; 
Tu  se'  solo  colui,  da  cu  io  tolsi 
Lo  hello  stile,  chc  rn   ha  fatto  onore. 

Inf.  c.  1.  V.  79. 

"  And  art  thou  then  that  Virgil,  that  well-spring, 
From  which  such  copious  floods  of  eloquence 
Have  issued  ?"     I,  with  front  abash'd,  replied  : 

"  Glory  and  light  of  all  the  tuneful  train  ! 
May  it  avail  me,  that  I  long  with  zeal 
Have  sought  thy  volume,  and  with  love  immense 


100  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Have  conn'd  it  o'er.     My  master,  thou,  and  guide! 
Thou  he  from  whom  I  have  alone  derivd 
That  style,  which  for  its  beauty  into  fame 
Exalts  me."  Cauy. 

Indeed  there  was  a  passion  and  a  miracle  of 
words  in  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries, 
afterthe  long  slumber  of  language  in  barbarism, 
which  gave  an  almost  romantic  character,  a 
virtuous  quality  and  power,  to  what  was  read 
in  a  book,  independently  of  the  thoughts  or 
images  contained  in  it.  This  feeling  is  very 
often  perceptible  in  Dante. 

II.  The  Images  in  Dante  are  not  only  taken 
from  obvious  nature,  and  are  all  intelligible  to 
all,  but  are  ever  conjoined  with  the  universal 
feeling  received  from  nature,  and  therefore  af- 
fect the  general  feelings  of  all  men.  And  in 
this  respect,  Dante's  excellence  is  very  great, 
and  may  be  contrasted  with  the  idiosyncracies 
of  some  meritorious  modern  poets,  who  attempt 
an  eruditeness,  the  result  of  particular  feelings. 
Consider  the  simplicity,  I  may  say  plainness, 
of  the  following  simile,  and  how  differently  we 
should  in  all  probability  deal  with  it  at  the 
jjresent  day  : 

Quale  i  fioretti  dal  notturno  gelo 
Chinati  e  cbiusi,  poi  die  '1  sol  gl'  imbianca, 
Si  drizzan  tutti  aperti  in  loro  stelo, — 

Fal  mi  fee'  io  di  mia  virtute  stanca  ; 

Inf.  c.  2.  V.  127. 

As  florets,  by  the  frosty  air  of  nigbt 

Bent  down  and  clos'd,  when  day  has  blanch'd  their  leaves, 


LECTURE  X.  101 


Rise  all  unfolded  on  their  spiry  stems, — 
So  was  my  fainting  vigour  new  restor'd. 

Gary 


* 


III.  Consider  the  wonderful  profoundness  of 
the  whole  third  canto  of  the  Inferno ;  and  es- 
pecially of  the  inscription  over  Hell  gate  : 

Per  me  si  va,  &c. — 

which  can  only  be  explained  by  a  meditation 
on  the  true  nature  of  religion  ;  that  is, — reason 
plus  the  understanding.  I  say  profoundness 
rather  than  sublimity ;  for  Dante  does  not  so 
much  elevate  your  thoughts  as  send  them  down 
deeper.  In  this  canto  all  the  images  are  dis- 
tinct, and  even  vividly  distinct ;  but  there  is  a 
total  impression  of  infinity ;  the  wholeness  is 
not  in  vision  or  conception,  but  in  an  inner 
feeling  of  totality,  and  absolute  being. 

IV.  In  picturesqueness,  Dante  is  beyond  all 
other  poets,  modern  or  ancient,  and  more  in 
the  stern  style  of  Pindar,  than  of  any  other. 
Michel  Angelo  is  said  to  have  made  a  design 
for  every  page  of  the  Divina  Commedia.  As 
superexcellent  in  this  respect,  I  would  note  the 
conclusion  of  the  third  canto  of  the  Inferno  : 

Ed  ecco  verso  noi  venir  per  nave 
Un  vecchio  bianco  per  antico  pelo 
Gridando  :  guai  a  voi  anime  prave  :  &c. 

Ver.  82.  &c. 


*  Mr.  Coleridge  here  notes :  "  Here  to  speak  of  Mr.  Gary's 
translation." — Ed. 

VOL.  I.  M 


IG'2  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 


And  lo !  toward  us  in  a  bark 
Comes  on  an  old  man,  hoary  white  with  eld. 
Crying,  "  Woe  to  you  wicked  spirits !" 

******* 

Gary 

Caron  dimonio  con  occhi  di  bragia 
Loro  accennando,  tutte  le  raccoglie  : 
Batte  col  remo  qualunque  s'  adagia. 

Come  d'  autunno  si  levan  le  foglie 
L'  una  appresso  dell  altra,  infin  che  '1  ramo 
Rende  alia  terra  tutte  le  sue  spoglie ; 

Similemente  il  mal  seme  d'  Adamo, 
Gittansi  di  quel  lito  ad  una  ad  una 
Per  cenni,  com'  augel  per  suo  richiamo. 

Ver.  100,  &c. 

Charon,  demoniac  form, 


With  eyes  of  burning  coal,  collects  them  all, 
Beck'ning,  and  each  that  lingers,  with  his  oar 
Strikes.     As  fall  off  the  light  autumnal  leaves, 
One  still  another  following,  till  the  bough 
Strews  all  its  honours  on  the  earth  beneath ; — 
E'en  in  like  manner  Adam's  evil  brood 
Cast  themselves  one  by  one  down  from  tlie  shore 
Each  at  a  beck,  as  falcon  at  his  call.  Cary. 

And  this  passage,  which  I  think  admirably 
picturesque : 

Ma  poco  valse,  che  1'  ale  al  sospetto 
Non  potero  avanzar  :  quegli  ando  sotto, 
E  quel  drizz6,  volando,  suso  il  petto  ; 

Non  altrimenti  1'  anitra  di  botto, 
Quando  '1  falcon  s'  appressa,  gii\  s'  attuffa, 
Ed  ei  ritorna  su  crucciato  e  rotto. 

Irato  Calcabrina  della  buffa, 
Volando  dietro  gli  tenne,  invaghlto, 
Che  quei  campasse,  per  aver  la  zuffa  : 

E  come  '1  barattier  fu  disparito, 


LECTURE  X.  163 

Cosl  volse  gli  artigli  al  suo  compagno, 
E  fu  con  lui  sovra  '1  fosso  ghermito. 

Ma  r  altro  fu  bene  sparvier  grifagno 
Ad  artigliar  ben  lui,  e  amedue 
Cadder  nel  mezzo  del  bollente  stagno. 

Lo  caldo  sghermidor  subito  fue  : 
Ma  peio  di  levarsi  era  niente, 
Si  aveano  inviscate  1'  ale  sue. 

Infer,  c.  xxii.  ver.  127,  &c. 

But  little  it  avail'd  :  terror  outstripp'd 
His  following  flight :  the  other  plung'd  beneath, 
And  he  with  upward  pinion  rais'd  his  breast : 
E'en  thus  the  water- fowl,  when  she  perceives 
The  falcon  near,  dives  instant  down,  while  he 
Enrag'd  and  spent  retires.     That  mockery 
In  Calcabrina  fury  stirr'd,  who  flew 
After  him,  with  desire  of  strife  inflara'd  ; 
And,  for  the  barterer  had  'scap'd,  so  turn'd 
His  talons  on  his  comrade.     O'er  the  dyke 
In  grapple  close  they  join'd  ;  but  th'  other  prov'd 
A  goshawk,  able  to  rend  well  his  foe  ; 
And  in  the  boiling  lake  both  fell.     The  heat 
Was  umpire  soon  between  them,  but  in  vain 
To  lift  themselves  they  strove,  so  fast  were  glued 
Their  pennons.  Gary. 

V.  Very  closely  connected  with  this  pictu- 
resqueness,isthe  topographic  reality  of  Dante's 
journey  through  Hell.  You  should  note  and 
dwell  on  this  as  one  of  his  great  charms,  and 
which  gives  a  striking  peculiarity  to  his  poetic 
power.  He  thus  takes  the  thousand  delusive 
forms  of  a  nature  worse  than  chaos,  having  no 
reality  but  from  the  passions  which  they 
excite,  and  compels  them  into  the  service  of 
the  permanent.  Observe  the  exceeding  truth 
of  these  lines  : 


104  COURSK  OF  LECTURES. 

Noi  ricidemmo  '1  cercliio  all'  altra  liva, 
Sovr'  una  foiitc  die  bolle,  e  riversa, 
Per  un  fossato  die  da  lei  diriva. 

L'  acqua  era  buja  niolto  piu  die  persa  : 
E  noi  in  compagnia  dell'  onde  bige 
Entraninio  gii\  per  una  via  diversa. 

Una  palude  fa,  ch'  ha  noma  Stige, 
Questo  tristo  ruscel,  quando  ^  disceso 
A\  pie  delle  maligne  piagge  grige. 

Ed  io  die  di  niirar  mi  stava  inteso, — 
Vidi  genti  fangose  in  quel  pantano 
Ignude  tutte,  e  con  senibiante  offeso. 

Questi  si  percotean  non  pur  con  mano, 
Ma  con  la  testa,  e  col  petto,  e  co'  piedi, 
Troncandosi  co'  denti  a  brano  a  brano. 
*  *  *  *  * 

Cos!  girammo  della  lorda  pozza 
Grand'  arco  tra  la  ripa  secca  e  '1  mezzo, 
Con  gli  ocelli  volti  a  clii  del  fango  ingozza  : 

Venimmo  appic  d'  una  torre  al  dassezzo. 

C.  vii.  ver.  100  and  127. 

We  the  circle  cross'd 


To  the  next  steep,  arriving  at  a  well. 
That  boiling  pours  itself  down  to  a  foss 
Sluic'd  from  its  source.     Far  murkier  was  the  wave 
Than  sablest  grain :  and  we  in  company 
Of  th'  inky  waters,  journeying  by  their  side, 
Enter'd,  though  by  a  different  track,  beneath. 
Into  a  lake,  the  Stygian  nam'd,  expands 
The  dismal  stream,  when  it  hath  reach'd  the  foot 
Of  the  grey  wither'd  cliffs.     Intent  I  stood 
To  gaze,  and  in  the  marish  sunk,  descried 
A  miry  tribe,  all  naked,  and  with  looks 
Betok'ning  rage.     They  with  their  hands  alone 
Struck  not,  but  with  the  head,  the  breast,  the  feet, 
Cutting  each  other  piecemeal  with  their  fangs. 
***** 

Our  route 


Thus  compass'd,  we  a  segment  widely  stretch'd 


LECTURE  X.  165 

Between  the  dry  embankment  and  the  cove 
Of  the  loath'd  pool,  turning  meanwhile  our  eyes 
Downward  on  those  who  gulp'd  its  muddy  lees ; 
Nor  stopped,  till  to  a  tower  s  loiv  base  we  came. 

Gary. 

VI.  For  Dante's  power, — his  absolute  mas- 
tery over,  although  rare  exhibition  of,  the  pa- 
thetic, I  can  do  no  more  than  refer  to  the  pas- 
sages on  Francesca  di  Rimini  (Infer.  C.  v.  ver. 
7.3  to  the  end.)  and  on  Ugolino,  (Infer.  C.  xxxiii. 
ver.  1.  to  75.)  They  are  so  well  known,  and 
rightly  so  admired,  that  it  would  be  pedantry 
to  analyze  their  composition  ;  but  you  will  note 
that  the  first  is  the  pathos  of  passion,  the  se- 
cond that  of  affection ;  and  yet  even  in  the 
first,  you  seem  to  perceive  that  the  lovers  have 
sacrificed  their  passion  to  the  cherishing  of  a 
deep  and  rememberable  impression. 

VII.  As  to  going  into  the  endless  subtle 
beauties  of  Dante,  that  is  impossible ;  but  I 
cannot  help  citing  the  first  triplet  of  the  2.9th 
canto  of  the  Inferno  : 

La  molta  gente  e  le  diverse  piaghe 
Avean  le  luci  mie  si  inebriate, 
Che  dello  stare  a  piangere  eran  vaghe. 

So  were  mine  eyes  inebriate  with  the  view 
Of  the  vast  multitude,  whom  various  wounds 
Disfigur'd,  that  they  long'd  to  stay  and  weep. 

Gary. 

Nor  have  I  now  room  for  any  specific  compa- 
rison of  Dante  with  Milton.     But  if  I  had,  1 


1G6  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

would  institute  it  upon  the  ground  of  the  last 
canto  of  the  Inferno  from  the  1st  to  the  69th 
line,  and  from  the  lOOth  to  the  end.  And  in 
this  comparison  I  should  notice  Dante's  occa- 
sional fault  of  becoming  grotesque  from  being 
too  graphic  without  imagination  ;  as  in  his 
Lucifer  compared  with  Milton's  Satan.  Indeed 
he  is  sometimes  horrible  rather  than  terrible, — 
falling  into  the  /«ctj/tov  instead  of  the  ^avov  of 
Longinus  ;*  in  other  words,  many  of  his  images 
excite  bodily  disgust,  and  not  moral  fear.  But 
here,  as  in  other  cases,  you  may  perceive  that 
the  faults  of  great  authors  are  generally  excel- 
lencies carried  to  an  excess. 


Milton. 
Born  in  London,  1608.— Died,  1674. 

If  we  divide  the  period  from  the  accession  of 
Elizabeth  to  the  Protectorate  of  Cromwell  into 
two  unequal  jiortions,  the  first  ending  with  the 
death  of  James  I.  the  other  comprehending 
the  reign  of  Charles  and  the  brief  glories  of 
the  Republic,  we  are  forcibly  struck  with  a 
difference  in  the  character  of  the  illustrious 
actors,  by  whom  each  period  is  rendered 
severally  memorable.  Or  rather,  the  diffe- 
rence in  the  characters  of  the  great  men  in 
each  period,  leads  us  to  make  this  division = 

*  De  Subl.  1.  ix. 


LECTURE  X.  167 

Eminent  as  the  intellectual  powers  were  that 
were  displayed  in  both ;  yet  in  the  number  of 
great  men,  in  the  various  sorts  of  excellence, 
and  not  merely  in  the  variety  but  almost  diver- 
sity of  talents  united  in  the  same  individual, 
the  age  of  Charles  falls  short  of  its  predecessor; 
and  the  stars  of  the  Parliament,  keen  as  their 
radiance  was,  in  fulness  and  richness  of  lustre, 
yield  to  the  constellation  at  the  court  of  Eliza- 
beth ; — which  can  only  be  paralleled  by  Greece 
in  her  brightest  moment,  when  the  titles  of  the 
poet,  the  philosopher,  the  historian,  the  states- 
man and  the  general  not  seldom  formed  a  gar- 
land round  the  same  head,  as  in  the  instances 
of  our  Sidneys  and  Raleighs.  But  then,  on  the 
other  hand,  there  was  a  vehemence  of  will,  an 
enthusiasm  of  principle,  a  depth  and  an  ear- 
nestness of  spirit,  which  the  charms  of  indi- 
vidual fame  and  personal  aggrandisement  could 
not  pacify ,^ — an  aspiration  after  reality,  perma- 
nence, and  general  good, — in  short,  a  moral 
grandeur  in  the  latter  period,  with  which  the 
low  intrigues,  Machiavellic  maxims,  and  selfish 
and  servile  ambition  of  the  former,  stand  in 
painful  contrast. 

The  causes  of  this  it  belongs  not  to  the  pre- 
sent occasion  to  detail  at  length ;  but  a  mere 
allusion  to  the  quick  succession  of  revolutions 
in  religion,  breeding  a  political  indifference  in 
the  mass  of  men  to  religion  itself,  the  enor- 
mous increase  of  the  royal  power  in  conse- 
quence of  the  humiliation  of  the  nobility  and 


108  COURSE  OF  LFXTURES. 

the  clergy — the  transference  of  the  papal  au- 
thority to  the  crown, — the  unfixed  state  of 
Elizabeth's  own  opinions,  whose  inclinations 
were  as  popish  as  her  interests  were  protestant 
— the  controversial  extravagance  and  practical 
imbecility  of  her  successor — will  help  to  ex- 
plain the  former  period  ;  and  the  persecutions 
that  had  given  a  life  and  soid-interest  to  the 
disputes  so  imprudently  fostered  by  James, — 
the  ardour  of  a  conscious  increase  of  power  in 
the  commons,  and  the  greater  austerity  of 
manners  and  maxims,  the  natural  product  and 
most  formidable  weapon  of  religious  disputa- 
tion, not  merely  in  conjunction,  but  in  closest 
combination,  with  newly  awakened  political 
and  republican  zeal,  these  perhaps  account  for 
the  character  of  the  latter  aera. 

In  the  close  of  the  former  period,  and  during 
the  bloom  of  the  latter,  the  poet  Milton  was 
educated  and  formed ;  and  he  survived  the 
latter,  and  all  the  fond  hopes  and  aspirations 
which  had  been  its  life ;  and  so  in  evil  days, 
standing  as  the  representative  of  the  combined 
excellence  of  both  periods,  he  produced  the 
Paradise  Lost  as  by  an  after- throe  of  nature. 
"  There  are  some  persons  (observes  a  divine,  a 
contemporary  of  Milton's)  of  whom  the  grace 
of  God  takes  early  hold,  and  the  good  spirit 
inhabiting  them,  carries  them  on  in  an  even 
constancy  through  innocence  into  virtue,  their 
Christianity  bearing  equal  date  with  their  man- 
hood, and  reason  and  religion,  like  warp  and 


LECTURE  X.  1C9 

woof,  riiiiniiig  together,  make  up  one  web  of  a 
wise  and  exemplary  life.     This  (he  adds)  is  a 
most  happy  case,  wherever  it  happens;    for, 
besides  that  there  is  no  sweeter  or  more  lovely 
thing  on  earth  than  the  early  buds  of  piety, 
which  drew  from  our  Saviour  signal  affection 
to  the  beloved  disciple,  it  is  better  to  have  no 
wound  than  to  experience  the  most  sovereign 
balsam,  which,  if  it  work  a  cure,  yet  usually 
leaves  a  scar  behind."     Although  it  was  and  is 
my  intention  to  defer  the  consideration  of  Mil- 
ton's own  character  to  the  conclusion  of  this 
Lecture,  yet  I  could  not  prevail  on  myself  to 
approach  the  Paradise  Lost  without  impressing 
on  your   minds   the   conditions  under  which 
such  a  work  was  in  fact  producible  at  all,  the 
original  genius  having  been  assumed  as  the 
immediate  agent  and  efficient  cause  ;  and  these 
conditions  I  find  in  the  character  of  the  times 
and  in  his  own  character.     The  age  in  which 
the   foundations  of  his  mind  were  laid,  was 
congenial  to  it  as  one  golden  oera  of  profound 
erudition    and    individual    genius ; — that    in 
which  the  superstructure  was  carried  up,  was 
no  less  favourable  to  it  by  a  sternness  of  disci- 
pline and  a  show  of  self-control,  highly  flatter- 
ing to  the  imaginative  dignity  of  an  heir  of 
fame,  and  which  won  Milton  over  from  the 
dear-loved  delights  of  academic  groves  and 
cathedral  aisles  to  the  anti-prelatic  party.     It 
acted  on  him,  too,  no  doubt,  and  modified  his 
studies  by  a  characteristic  controversial  spirit, 


170  COURSE  OF   LECTUUES. 

(his  presentation  of  God  is  tinted  with  it)— a 
spirit  not  less  busy  indeed  in  political  than  in 
theological  and  ecclesiastical  dispute,  but  car- 
rying on  the  former  almost  always,  more  or 
less,  in  the  guise  of  the  latter.  And  so  far  as 
Pope's  censure*  of  our  poet, — that  he  makes 
God  the  Father  a  school  divine — is  just,  we 
must  attribute  it  to  the  character  of  his  age, 
from  which  the  men  of  genius,  who  escaped, 
escaped  by  a  worse  disease,  the  licentious  in- 
difference of  a  Frenchified  court. 

Such  was  the  nidus  or  soil,  which  consti- 
tuted, in  the  strict  sense  of  the  word,  the  cir- 
cumstances of  Milton's  mind.  In  his  mind 
itself  there  were  purity  and  piety  absolute ;  an 
imagination  to  which  neither  the  past  nor  the 
present  were  interesting,  except  as  far  as  they 
called  forth  and  enlivened  the  great  ideal,  in 
which  and  for  which  he  lived ;  a  keen  love  of 
truth,  which,  after  many  weary  pursuits,  found 
a  harbour  in  a  sublime  listening  to  the  still 
voice  in  his  own  spirit,  and  as  keen  a  love  of 
his  country,  which,  after  a  disappointment 
still  more  depressive,  expanded  and  soared 
into  a  love  of  man  as  a  probationer  of  immor- 
tality. These  were,  these  alone  could  be,  the 
conditions  under  whidi  such  a  work  as  the 
Paradise  Lost  could  be  conceived  and  accom- 
plished. By  a  life-long  study  Milton  had 
known — 

*  Table  Talk,  vol.  ii.  p.  264. 


\ 


LECTIJUK  X.  171 

What  was  of  use  to  know, 
What  best  to  say  could  say,  to  do  had  done. 
His  actions  to  his  words  agreed,  his  words 
To  his  large  heart  gave  utterance  due,  his  heart 
Contain'd  of  good,  wise,  fair,  the  perfect  shape  ; 

and  he  left  the  imperishable  total,  as  a  bequest 
to  the  ages  coming,  in  the  Paradise  Lost.* 

Difficult  as  I  shall  find  it  to  turn  over  these 
leaves  without  catching  some  passage,  which 
would  tempt  me  to  stop,  I  propose  to  consider, 
1st,  the  general  plan  and  arrangement  of  the 
work ; — 2ndly,  the  subject  with  its  difficulties 
and  advantages; — 3rdly,  the  poet's  object,  the 
spirit  in  the  letter,  the  evSv/^uov  Iv  /.wOm,  the  true 
school-divinity  ;  and  lastly,  the  characteristic 
excellencies  of  the  poem,  in  what  they  consist, 
and  by  what  means  they  were  produced. 

1.  As  to  the  plan  and  ordonnance  of  the 
Poem. 

Compare  it  with  the  Iliad,  many  of  the  books 
of  which  might  change  places  without  any  in- 
jury to  the  thread  of  the  story.  Indeed,  I 
doubt  the  original  existence  of  the  Iliad  as  one 
poem  ;  it  seems  more  probable  that  it  was  put 
together  about  the  time  of  the  Pisistratidse. 
The  Iliad — and,  more  or  less,  all  epic  poems, 
the  subjects  of  which  are  taken  from  history — 

*  Here  Mr.  C.  notes  :  "  Not  perhaps  here,  but  towards,  or 
as,  the  conclusion,  to  chastise  the  fashionable  notion  that 
poetry  is  a  relaxation  or  amusement,  one  of  the  superfluous 
toys  and  luxuries  of  the  intellect!  To  contrast  the  perma- 
nence of  poems  with  the  transiency  and  fleeting  moral  effects 
of  empires,  and  what  are  called,  great  events."     Ed. 


172  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

have  no  rounded  conclusion ;  they  remain, 
after  all,  but  single  chapters  from  the  volume 
of  history,  although  they  are  ornamental 
chapters.  Consider  the  exquisite  simplicity  of 
the  Paradise  Lost.  It  and  it  alone  really 
possesses  a  beginning,  a  middle,  and  an  end ; 
it  has  the  totality  of  the  poem  as  distinguished 
from  the  ah  ovo  birth  and  parentage,  or 
straight  line,  of  history. 

2.  As  to  the  subject. 

In  Homer,  the  supposed  importance  of  the 
subject,  as  the  first  effort  of  confederated 
Greece,  is  an  after-thought  of  the  critics  ;  and 
the  interest,  such  as  it  is,  derived  from  the  events 
themselves,  as  distinguished  from  the  manner 
of  representing  them,  is  very  languid  to  all  but 
Greeks.  It  is  a  Greek  poem.  The  superiority 
of  the  Paradise  Lost  is  obvious  in  this  respect, 
that  the  interest  transcends  the  limits  of  a  na- 
tion. But  we  do  not  generally  dwell  on  this 
excellence  of  the  Paradise  Lost,  because  it 
seems  attributable  to  Christianity  itself; — yet  in 
fact  the  interest  is  wider  than  Christendom,  and 
comprehends  the  Jewish  and  Mohammedan 
worlds  ; — nay,  still  further,  inasmuch  as  it  re- 
presents the  origin  of  evil,  and  the  combat  of 
evil  and  good,  it  contains  matter  of  deep  interest 
to  all  mankind,  as  forming  the  basis  of  all  re- 
ligion, and  the  true  occasion  of  all  philosophy 
whatsoever. 

The  Fall  of  Man  is  the  subject ;   Satan  is 
the  cause ;  man's  blissful  state  the  immediate 


LECTURE  X.  173 

object  of  his  enmity  and  attack  ;  man  is  warned 
by  an  angel  who  gives  him  an  account  of  all 
that  was  requisite  to  be  known,  to  make  the 
warning  at  once  intelligible  and  awful ;  then 
the  temj^tation  ensues,  and  the  Fall ;  then  the 
immediate  sensible  consequence ;  then  the 
consolation,  wherein  an  angel  presents  a  vision 
of  the  history  of  men  with  the  ultimate  triumph 
of  the  Redeemer.  Nothing  is  touched  in  this 
vision  but  what  is  of  general  interest  in  re- 
ligion ;  any  thing  else  would  have  been  im- 
proper. 

The  inferiority  of  Klopstock's  Messiah  is 
inexpressible.  I  admit  the  prerogative  of 
poetic  feeling,  and  poetic  faith ;  but  I  cannot 
suspend  the  judgment  even  for  a  moment.  A 
poem  may  in  one  sense  be  a  dream,  but  it 
must  be  a  waking  dream.  In  Milton  you  have 
a  religious  faith  combined  with  the  moral 
nature ;  it  is  an  efflux ;  you  go  along  with  it. 
In  Klopstock  there  is  a  wilfulness ;  he  makes 
things  so  and  so.  The  feigned  speeches  and 
events  in  the  Messiah  shock  us  like  false- 
hoods ;  but  nothing  of  that  sort  is  felt  in  the 
Paradise  Lost,  in  M^hich  no  particulars,  at  least 
very  few  indeed,  are  touched  which  can  come 
into  collision  or  juxta-position  with  recorded 
matter. 

But  notwithstanding  the  advantages  in  Mil- 
ton's subject,  there  were  concomitant  insupe- 
rable difficulties,  and  Milton  has  exhibited 
marvellous  skill  in  keeping  most  of  them  out 


174  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

of  sight.  High  poetry  is  tlie  translation  of 
reality  into  the  ideal  under  the  predicament  of 
succession  of  time  only.  The  poet  is  an 
historian,  upon  condition  of  moral  power  being 
the  only  force  in  the  universe.  The  very  gran- 
deur of  his  subject  ministered  a  difficulty  to 
Milton.  The  statement  of  a  being  of  high  in- 
tellect, warring  against  the  svipreme  Being, 
seems  to  contradict  the  idea  of  a  supreme 
Being.  Milton  precludes  our  feeling  this,  as 
much  as  possible,  by  keeping  the  peculiar  at- 
tributes of  divinity  less  in  sight,  making  them 
to  a  certain  extent  allegorical  only.  Again, 
poetry  implies  the  language  of  excitement ;  yet 
how  to  reconcile  such  language  with  God  .' 
Hence  Milton  confines  the  poetic  passion  in 
God's  speeches  to  the  language  of  scripture ; 
and  once  only  allows  the  passio  vera,  or  quasi- 
humana  to  appear,  in  the  passage,  where  the 
Father  contemplates  his  own  likeness  in  the 
Son  before  the  battle  : — 

Go  then,  thou  Mightiest,  in  thy  Father's  might, 
Ascend  my  chariot,  guide  the  rapid  wheels 
That  shake  Heaven's  basis,  bring  forth  all  my  war, 
My  bow  and  thunder ;  my  almighty  arms 
Gird  on,  and  sword  upon  thy  puissant  thigh; 
Pursue  these  sons  of  darkness,  drive  them  out 
From  all  Heaven's  bounds  into  the  utter  deep  : 
There  let  them  learn,  as  likes  them,  to  despise 
God  and  Messiah  his  anointed  king. 

B.  VI.  V.  710. 

3.  As  to  Milton's  object : — 


LECTURE  X.  175 

It  was  to  justify  the  ways  of  God  to  man  ! 
The  controversial  spirit  observable  in  many 
parts  of  the  poem,  especially  in  God's  speeches, 
is  immediately  attributable  to  the  great  con- 
troversy of  that  age,  the  origination  of  evil. 
The  Arminians  considered  it  a  mere  calamity. 
The  Calvinists  took  away  all  human  will. 
Milton  asserted  the  will,  but  declared  for  the 
enslavement  of  the  will  out  of  an  act  of  the  will 
itself.  There  are  three  powers  in  us,  whicli 
distinguish  us  from  the  beasts  that  perish ; — 
1 ,  reason ;  2,  the  power  of  viewing  universal 
truth ;  and  3,  the  power  of  contracting  uni- 
versal truth  into  particulars.  Religion  is  the 
will  in  the  reason,  and  love  in  the  will. 

The  character  of  Satan  is  pride  and  sensual 
indulgence,  finding  in  self  the  sole  motive  of 
action.  It  is  the  character  so  often  seen  in 
little  on  the  political  stage.  It  exhibits  all  the 
restlessness,  temerity,  and  cunning  which  have 
marked  the  mighty  hunters  of  mankind  from 
Nimrod  to  Napoleon.  The  common  fascina- 
tion of  men  is,  that  these  great  men,  as  they 
are  called,  must  act  from  some  great  motive. 
Milton  has  carefully  marked  in  his  Satan  the 
intense  selfishness,  the  alcohol  of  egotism, 
which  would  rather  reign  in  hell  than  serve  in 
heaven.  To  place  this  lust  of  self  in  opposition 
to  denial  of  self  or  duty,  and  to  show  what  ex- 
ertions it  would  make,  and  what  pains  endure 
to  accomplish  its  end,  is  Milton's  particular 
object  in  the  character  of  Satan.     But  around 


17G  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

this  character  he  has  thrown  a  singuhirity  of 
daring,  a  grandeur  of  sufterance,  and  a  ruined 
splendour,  which  constitute  the  very  height  of 
poetic  sublimity. 

Lastly,  as  to  the  execution  : — 

The  language  and  versification  of  the  Para- 
dise Lost  are  peculiar  in  being  so  much  more 
necessarily  correspondent  to  each  than  those  in 
any  other  poem  or  poet.  The  connexion  of 
the  sentences  and  the  position  of  the  words  are 
exquisitely  artificial ;  but  the  position  is  rather 
according  to  the  logic  of  passion  or  universal 
logic,  than  to  the  logic  of  grammar.  Milton 
attempted  to  make  the  English  language  obey 
the  logic  of  passion  as  perfectly  as  the  Greek 
and  Latin.  Hence  the  occasional  harshness 
in  the  construction. 

Sublimity  is  the  pre-eminent  characteristic 
of  the  Paradise  Lost.  It  is  not  an  arithmetical 
sublime  like  Klopstock's,  whose  rule  always  is 
to  treat  what  we  might  think  large  as  con- 
temptibly small.  Klopstock  mistakes  bigness 
for  greatness.  There  is  a  greatness  arising 
from  images  of  effort  and  daring,  and  also  from 
those  of  moral  endurance  ;  in  Milton  both  are 
united.  The  fallen  angels  are  human  pas- 
sions, invested  with  a  dramatic  reality. 

The  apostrophe  to  light  at  the  commence- 
ment of  the  third  book  is  particularly  beautiful 
as  an  intermediate  link  between  Hell  and 
Heaven  ;  and  observe,  how  the  second  and  third 
book  support  the  subjective  character  of  the 


^^ECTUUi:  X.  177 

poem.  Ill  all  modern  poetry  in  Christendom 
there  is  an  under  consciousness  of  a  sinful 
nature,  a  fleeting  away  of  external  things,  the 
mind  or  subject  greater  than  the  object,  the 
reflective  character  predominant.  In  the  Pa- 
radise Lost  the  sublimest  parts  are  the  reve- 
lations of  Milton's  own  mind,  producing  itself 
and  evolving  its  own  greatness ;  and  this  is  so 
truly  so,  that  when  that  which  is  merely  enter- 
taining for  its  objective  beauty  is  introduced, 
it  at  first  seems  a  discord 

'  In  the  description  of  Paradise  itself  you 
have  Milton's  sunny  side  as  a  man  ;  here  his 
descriptive  powers  are  exercised  to  the  utmost, 
and  he  draws  deep  upon  his  Italian  resources. 
In  the  description  of  Eve,  and  throughout  this 
part  of  the  poem,  the  poet  is  predominant  over 
the  theologian.  Dress  is  the  symbol  of  the 
Fall,  but  the  mark  of  intellect ;  and  the  meta- 
physics of  dress  are,  the  hiding  what  is  not 
symbolic  and  displaying  by  discrimination 
what  is.  The  love  of  Adam  and  Eve  in  Pa- 
radise is  of  the  highest  merit — not  phanto- 
matic,  and  yet  removed  from  every  thing  de- 
grading. It  is  the  sentiment  of  one  rational 
being  towards  another  made  tender  by  a  spe- 
cific difterence  in  that  which  is  essentially  the 
same  in  both  ;  it  is  a  union  of  opposites,  a 
giving  and  receiving  mutually  of  the  perma- 
nent in  either,  a  completion  of  each  in  the 
other. 

Milton  is  not  a  picturesque,  but  a  musical, 

VOL.  I.  N 


178  COURSK  OF  LECTURES. 

poet ;  althougli  he  has  this  merit  that  the  oh- 
ject  chosen  by  him  for  any  particular  fore- 
ground always  remains  prominent  to  the  end, 
enriched,  but  not  incumbered,  by  the  opulence 
of  descriptive  details  furnished  by  an  exhaust- 
less  imagination.  I  wish  the  Paradise  Lost 
were  more  carefully  read  and  studied  than  I 
can  see  any  ground  for  believing  it  is,  es^^e- 
cially  those  parts  which,  from  the  habit  of  al- 
ways looking  for  a  story  in  poetry,  are  scarcely 
read  at  all, — as  for  example,  Adam's  vision  of 
future  events  in  the  11th  and  12th  books.  No 
one  can  rise  from  the  perusal  of  this  immortal 
poem  without  a  deep  sense  of  the  grandeur  and 
the  purity  of  Milton's  soul,  or  without  feeling 
how  susceptible  of  domestic  enjoyments  he 
really  was,  notwithstanding  the  discomforts 
which  actually  resulted  from  an  apparently 
unhappy  choice  in  marriage.  He  was,  as 
every  truly  great  poet  has  ever  been,  a  good 
man ;  but  finding  it  impossible  to  realize  his 
own  aspirations,  either  in  religion,  or  politics,  or 
society,  he  gave  up  his  heart  to  the  living  spirit 
and  light  within  him,  and  avenged  himself  on 
the  world  by  enriching  it  with  this  record  of 
his  own  transcendant  ideal. 


lEOTUUE  X.  179 


NOTES  ON  MILTON.       1807.* 

(Hayley  quotes  the  following  passage  : — ) 

"  Time  serves  not  now,  and,  perhaps,  I  might  seem  too 
profuse  to  give  any  certain  account  of  what  the  mind  at  home, 
in  the  spacious  circuits  of  her  musing,  hath  liberty  to  propose 
to  herself,  though  of  highest  hope  and  hardest  attempting; 
whether  that  epic  form,  Avhereof  the  two  poems  of  Homer,  and 
those  other  two  of  Virgil  and  Tasso,  are  a  diffuse,  and  the 
Book  of  Job  a  bnef,  model.'^     p.  69. 

These  latter  words  deserve  particular  no- 
tice. I  do  not  doubt  that  Milton  intended  his 
Paradise  Lost  as  an  epic  of  the  first  class,  and 
that  the  poetic  dialogue  of  the  Book  of  Job 
was  his  model  for  the  general  scheme  of  his 
Paradise  Regained.  Readers  would  not  be 
disappointed  in  this  latter  poem,  if  they  pro- 
ceeded to  a  perusal  of  it  with  a  proper  precon- 
ception of  the  kind  of  interest  intended  to  be 
excited  in  that  admirable  work.  In  its  kind 
it  is  the  most  perfect  poem  extant,  though  its 
kind  may  be  inferior  in  interest — being  in  its 
essence  didactic— to  that  other  sort,  in  which 
instruction  is  conveyed  more  effectively,  be- 
cause less  directly,  in  connection  with  stronger 
and  more  pleasurable  emotions,  and  thereby 

*  These  notes  were  written  by  Mr.  Coleridge  in  a  copy  of 
Hayley 's  Life  of  Milton,  (4to.  1796),  belonging  to  Mr.  Poole. 
By  him  they  were  communicated,  and  this  seems  the  fittest 
place  for  their  publication.     Ed, 


180  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

in  a  closer  aflniity  with  action.  But  might  wc 
not  as  rationally  object  to  an  accomplislud 
woman's  conversing,  however  agreeably,  be- 
canse  it  has  happened  that  wc  have  received  a 
keener  pleasure  from  her  singing  to  the  harp? 
Si  genus  sit  proho  et  sapienti  viro  hand  indig- 
7ium^  et  si  poetna  sit  in  suo  gen  ere  perfectum, 
satis  est.  Quod  si  hoc  auctor  idem  alliorihns 
numeris  et  carmini  diviniori  ipsnm  jier  se  divi- 
num  sicperaddiderit,  mehcrcule  satis  est,  ct  plus- 
quam  satis.  I  cannot,  however,  but  wish  that 
the  answer  of  Jesus  to  Satan  in  the  4th  book, 
(v.  285.)— 

Think  not  but  that  I  know  these  things ;  or  think 
I  know  them  not,  not  therefore  am  I  short 
Of  knowing  what  I  ought,  &c. 

had  breathed  the  spirit  of  Hayley's  noble 
quotation  rather  than  the  narrow  bigotry  of 
Gregory  the  Great.  The  passage  is,  indeed, 
excellent,  and  is  partially  true ;  but  partial 
truth  is  the  worst  mode  of  conveying  false- 
hood. 

Hayley,  p.  75.  "  The  sincerest  friends  of  Milton  may 
here  agree  with  Johnson,  who  speaks  of  his  controversial 
merriment  as  disgusting." 

The  man  who  reads  a  work  meant  for  imme- 
diate effect  on  one  age  with  the  notions  and 
feelings  of  another,  may  be  a  refined  gentle- 
man, but  must  be  a  sorry  critic.  He  who 
possesses  imagination  enough  to  live  with  his 
forefathers,  and,  leaving  comparative  reflection 


LECTURE  X.  181 

for  an  after  moment,  to  give  himself  up  during* 
the  first  perusal  to  the  feelings  of  a  contempo- 
rary, if  not  a  partizan,  will,  I  dare  aver,  rarely 
find  any  part  of  Milton's  prose  works  disgust- 
ing. 

(Hayley,  p.  104.  Hayley  is  speaking  of  the 
passage  in  Milton's  Answer  to  Icon  Basilice, 
in  which  he  accuses  Charles  of  taking  his 
Prayer  in  captivity  from  Pamela's  prayer  in 
the  3rd  book  of  Sidney's  Arcadia.  The  pas- 
sage begins, — 

"  But  this  king,  not  content  with  that  which,  although  in  a 
thing  holy,  is  no  holy  theft,  to  attribute  to  his  own  making 
other  men's  whole  prayers,  &c.   Symmons'  ed.  1806,  p.  407.) 

Assuredly,  I  regret  that  Milton  should  have 
written  this  passage  ;  and  yet  the  adoption  of  a 
prayer  from  a  romance  on  such  an  occasion 
does  not  evince  a  delicate  or  deeply  sincere 
mind.  We  are  the  creatures  of  association. 
There  are  some  excellent  moral  and  even 
serious  lines  in  Hudibras ;  but  what  if  a  clergy- 
man should  adorn  his  sermon  with  a  quotation 
from  that  poem  !  Would  the  abstract  propriety 
of  the  verses  leave  him  "  honourably  ac- 
qiutted?"  The  Christian  baptism  of  a  line  in 
Virgil  is  so  far  from  being  a  parallel,  that  it  is 
ridiculously  inappropriate, — an  absurdity  as 
glaring  as  that  of  the  bigotted  Puritans,  who 
objected  to  some  of  the  noblest  and  most  scrip- 
tural prayers  ever  dictated  by  wisdom  and 
piety,  simply  because  the  Roman  Catholics 
had  used  them. 


182  COURSE  or  lectures. 

Hayley,  p.  107.     "  The  ambition  of  Milton,"  &c. 

I  do  not  approve  the  so  frequent  use  of  this 
word  rehitively  to  Milton.  Indeed  the  fondness 
for  ingrafting  a  good  sense  on  the  word  "  am- 
bition," is  not  a  Christian  impulse  in  general. 

Hayley,  p.  110.  "  Milton  himself  seems  to  have  thought 
it  allowable  in  literary  contention  to  vilify,  &c.  the  character 
of  an  opponent;  but  surely  this  doctrine  is  unworthy,"  &c. 

If  ever  it  were  allowable,  in  this  case  it  was 
especially  so.  But  these  general  observations, 
\vithout  meditation  on  the  particular  times  and 
the  genius  of  the  times,  are  most  often  as  un- 
just as  they  are  always  superficial. 

(Hayley,  p.  133.  Hayley  is  speaking  of 
Milton's  panegyric  on  CromwelFs  govern- 
ment : — ) 

Besides,  however  Milton  might  and  did  re- 
gret the  immediate  necessity,  yet  what  alter- 
native was  there?  Was  it  not  better  that 
Cromwell  should  usurp  power,  to  protect  re- 
ligious freedom  at  least,  than  that  the  Presby- 
terians should  usurp  it  to  introduce  a  religious 
persecution, — extending  the  notion  of  spiritual 
concerns  so  far  as  to  leave  no  freedom  even  to 
a  man's  bedchamber? 

(Hayley,  p.  '250.  Hayley's  conjectures  on 
the  origin  of  the  Paradise  Lost : — ) 

If  Milton  borrowed  a  hint  from  any  writer, 
it  was  more  probably  from  Strada's  Prolusions, 
in  which  the  Fall  of  the  Angels  is  pointed  out 


LECTURE  X.  183 

as  the  noblest  subject  for  a  Christian  poet.* 
The  more  dissimilar  the  detailed  images  are, 
the  more  likely  it  is  that  a  great  genius  should 
catcli  the  general  idea. 

(Hayl.  p.  294.  Extracts  from  the  Adamo  of 
Andreini :) 

"  Lucifero.  Che  dal  mio  centre  oscuro 

Mi  chiaina  a  rimirar  cotanta  luce  ? 

Who  from  my  dark  abyss 

Calls  me  to  gaze  on  this  excess  of  light  ?" 

The  words  in  italics  are  an  unfair  transla- 
tion. They  may  suggest  that  Milton  really 
had  read  and  did  imitate  this  drama.  The 
original  is  '  in  so  great  light.'  Indeed  the  whole 
version  is  affectedly  and  inaccurately  Miltonic. 

lb.  V.  1 1 .     Che  di  fango  opre  festi — 

Forming  thy  works  of  dust  (nO,  dirt. — ) 

lb.  V.  17.     Tessa  pur  stella  a  stella 

V  aggiungo  e  luna,  e  sole. — 

Let  him  unite  above 

Star  upon  star,  moon,  sun. 

Let  him  weave  star  to  star, 
Then  join  both  moon  and  sun  ! 


*  The  reference  seems  generally  to  be  to  the  5th  Prolusion 
of  the  1st  Book.  Hie  arcus  ac  tela,  quibus  olim  in  magno 
illo  Sujierum  tumultu  pj'ijiceps  armorum  Michael  confixit 
auctorem  proditionis  ;  hie  fulmina  humancB  mentis  terror.    * 

*  *       *.       hi   nuhibus   armatas   bello    legiones   instruam, 
atque  inde  pro  re  7iata  auxiliares  ad  ten-am  copias  evocabo. 

*  *     *.     Hie  mihi  Ccelites,  quos  esse  ferunt  elementorum 
tutelares,  jjrima  ilia  corpora  miscebunt.  sect.  4.     Ed. 


184  COURSE  or  lectures. 

lb,  V.  21.      Ch  'al  fin  con  biasmo  e  scorno 

Vana  1*  opra  sara,  vano  il  siidore  ! 

Since  in  the  end  division 

Shall  prove  his  works  and  all  his  efforts  vain. 

Since  finally  with  censure  and  disdain 
Vain  shall  the  work  be,  and  his  toil  be  vain  ! 

1790.* 
The  reader  of  Milton  must  be  always  on  his 
duty  :  he  is  surrounded  with  sense  ;  it  rises  in 
every  line ;  every  word  is  to  the  purpose. 
There  are  no  lazy  intervals ;  all  has  been  con- 
sidered, and  demands  and  merits  observation. 
If  this  be  called  obscurity,  let  it  be  remem- 
bered that  it  is  such  an  obscurity  as  is  a  com- 
pliment to  the  reader ;  not  that  vicious  obscu- 
rity, which  proceeds  from  a  muddled  head. 


LECTURE  Xl.t 

ASIATIC   AND    GREEK   MYTHOLOGIES  —  ROBINSON 
CRUSOE — USE  OF  WORKS  OF  IMAGINA- 
TION IN  EDUCATION. 

A  CONFOUNDING  of  God  witli  Nature,  and  an 
incapacity  of  finding  unity  in  the  manifold  and 
infinity  in  the  individual, — these  are  the  origin 
of  polytheism.     The  most  perfect  instance  of 

*  From  a  common-place  book  of  Mr.  C.'s,  communicated 
by  Mr.  J.  M.  Gutch.     Ed. 

t  Partly  from  Mr.  Green's  note.     Ed. 


LECTURE  XI.  185 

this  kind  of  theism  is  that  of  early  Greece; 
other  nations  seem  to  have  either  transcended, 
or  come  short  of,  the  old  Hellenic  standard, — a 
mythology  in  itself  fundamentally  allegorical, 
and  typical  of  the  powers  and  functions  of 
nature,  but  subsequently  mixed  up  with  a 
deification  of  great  men  and  hero-worship, — 
so  that  finally  the  original  idea  became  inex- 
tricably combined  with  the  form  and  attributes 
of  some  legendary  individual.  In  Asia,  pro- 
bably from  the  greater  unity  of  the  govern- 
ment and  the  still  surviving  influence  of  patri- 
archal tradition,  the  idea  of  the  unity  of  God, 
in  a  distorted  reflection  of  the  Mosaic  scheme, 
was  much  more  generally  preserved ;  and  ac- 
cordingly all  other  super  or  ultra-human  beings 
coukl  only  be  represented  as  ministers  of,  or 
rebels  against,  his  will.  The  Asiatic  genii  and 
fairies  are,  therefore,  always  endowed  with 
moral  qualities,  and  distinguishable  as  malig- 
nant or  benevolent  to  man.  It  is  this  uniform 
attribution  of  fixed  moral  qualities  to  the  super- 
natural agents  of  eastern  mythology  that  parti- 
cularly separates  them  from  the  divinities  of 
old  Greece. 

Yet  it  is  not  altogether  improbable  that  in 
the  Samothracian  or  Cabeiric  mysteries  the 
link  between  the  Asiatic  and  Greek  popular 
schemes  of  mythology  lay  concealed.  Of 
these  mysteries  there  are  conflicting  accounts, 
and,  perhaps,  there  were  variations  of  doctrine 
in   tlie   lapse    of  ages   and   intercourse   with 


18G  COURSE  or  lectures. 

other  systems.  But,  upon  a  review  of  all 
that  is  left  to  us  on  this  subject  in  the  writings 
of  the  ancients,  we  may,  I  think,  make  out 
thus  much  of  an  interesting  fact, — that  Ca- 
biri,  impliedly  at  least,  meant  socii,  com- 
plices, having  a  hypostatic  or  fundamental 
union  with,  or  relation  to,  each  other ;  that 
these  mysterious  divinities  were,  ultimately  at 
least,  divided  into  a  higher  and  lower  triad ; 
that  the  lower  triad,  pri mi  quia  injimi,  consisted 
of  the  old  Titanic  deities  or  powers  of  nature, 
under  the  obscure  names  of  Axieros,  Axioker- 
sos,  and  Axiokersa,  representing  symbolically 
different  modifications  of  animal  desire  or  ma- 
terial action,  such  as  hunger,  thirst,  and  fire, 
without  consciousness ;  that  the  higher  triad, 
ultimi  quia  superiores,  consisted  of  Jupiter, 
(Pallas,  or  Apollo,  or  Bacchus,  or  Mercury, 
mystically  called  Cadmilos)  and  Venus,  repre- 
senting, as  before,  the  vovq  or  reason,  the  Xo-yo<; 
or  M'ord  or  communicative  power,  and  the  i^^q 
or  love ; — that  the  Cadmilos  or  Mercury,  the 
manifested,  communicated,  or  sent,  appeared 
not  only  in  his  proper  person  as  second  of  the 
higher  triad,  but  also  as  a  mediator  between 
the  higher  and  lower  triad,  and  so  there  were 
seven  divinities ;  and,  indeed,  according  to 
some  authorities,  it  might  seem  that  the  Cad- 
milos acted  once  as  a  mediator  of  the  higher, 
and  once  of  the  lower,  triad,  and  that  so  there 
were  eight  Cabeiric  divinities.  The  lower  or 
Titanic  powers  being  subdued,  chaos  ceased, 


LECTURE  XI.  187 

and  creation  began  in  the  reign  of  the  divi- 
nities of  mind  and  love  ;  but  the  chaotic  gods 
still  existed  in  the  abyss,  and  the  notion  of 
evoking  them  was  the  origin,  the  idea,  of  the 
Greek  necromancy. 

These  mysteries,  like  all  the  others,  were 
certainly  in  connection  with  either  the  Phceni- 
cian  or  Egyptian  systems,  perhaps  with  both. 
Hence  the  old  Cabeiric  powers  were  soon  made 
to  answer  to  the  corresponding  popular  divi- 
nities ;  and  the  lower  triad  was  called  by  the 
uninitiated,  Ceres,  Vulcan  or  Pluto,  and  Pro- 
serpine, and  the  Cadmilos  became  Mercury. 
It  is  not  without  ground  that  I  direct  your  at- 
tention, under  these  circumstances,  to  the  pro- 
bable derivation  of  some  portion  of  this  most 
remarkable  system  from  patriarchal  tradition, 
and  to  the  connection  of  the  Cabeiri  with  the 
Kabbala. 

The  Samothracian  mysteries  continued  in 
celebrity  till  some  time  after  the  commence- 
ment of  the  Christian  era.*  But  they  gra- 
dually sank  with  the  rest  of  the  ancient  system 
of  mythology,  to  which,  in  fact,  they  did  not 
properly  belong.  The  peculiar  doctrines,  how- 
ever, were  preserved  in  the  memories  of  the 
initiated,  and  handed  down  by  individuals. 
No  doubt  they  were  propagated  in  Europe,  and 

*  In  the  reign  of  Tiberius,  A.  D.  18,Germanicus  attempted 
to  visit  Samotluace  ; — ilium  in  rccjressu  sacra  Samotkracuvi 
visere  nitentem  obvii  aquiluncs  dcjmlcre.  Tacit.  Ann.  II.  c. 
54.     Ed. 


188  COURSE  OK  LECTURES. 

it  is  not  improbable  that  Paracelsus  received 
many  of  his  opinions  from  such  persons,  and  I 
think  a  connection  may  be  traced  between 
him  and  Jacob  Behmen. 

The  Asiatic  supernatural  beings  are  all  pro- 
duced by  imagining  an  excessive  magnitude, 
or  an  excessive  smallness  combined  with  great 
power  ;  and  the  broken  associations,  which 
must  have  given  rise  to  such  conceptions,  are 
the  sources  of  the  interest  which  they  inspire, 
as  exhibiting,  through  the  working  of  the  ima- 
gination, the  idea  of  power  in  the  will.  This 
is  delightfully  exemplified  in  the  Arabian 
Nights'  Entertainments,  and  indeed,  more  or 
less,  in  other  works  of  the  same  kind.  In  all 
these  there  is  the  same  activity  of  mind  as  in 
dreaming,  that  is — an  exertion  of  the  fancy  in 
the  combination  and  recombination  of  familiar 
objects  so  as  to  produce  novel  and  wonderful 
imagery.  To  this  must  be  added  that  these 
tales  cause  no  deep  feeling  of  a  moral  kind — 
whether  of  religion  or  love  ;  but  an  impulse  of 
motion  is  communicated  to  the  mind  without 
excitement,  and  this  is  the  reason  of  their 
being  so  generally  read  and  admired. 

I  think  it  not  unlikely  that  the  Milesian 
Talcs  contained  the  germs  of  many  of  those 
now  in  the  Arabian  Nights;  indeed  it  is 
scarcely  possible  to  doubt  that  the  Greek  em- 
pire must  have  left  deep  impression  on  the 
Persian  intellect.  So  also  many  of  the  Roman 
Catholic  legends  are  taken  from  Apuleius,    In 


LECTURE  XI.  189 

that  exquisite  story  of  Cupid  and  Psyche,  the 
allegory  is  of  no  injury  to  the  dramatic  vivid- 
ness of  the  tale.  It  is  evidently  a  philosophic 
attempt  to  parry  Christianity  with  a  quasi-Ph\- 
tonic  account  of  the  fall  and  redemption  of 
the  soul. 

The  charm  of  De  Foe's  works,  especially  of 
Robinson  Crusoe,  is  founded  on  the  same  prin- 
ciple. It  always  interests,  never  agitates. 
Crusoe  himself  is  merely  a  representative  of 
humanity  in  general ;  neither  his  intellectual 
nor  his  moral  qualities  set  him  above  the  mid- 
dle degree  of  mankind  ;  his  only  prominent 
characteristic  is  the  spirit  of  enterprise  and 
wandering,  which  is,  nevertheless,  a  very  com- 
mon disposition.  You  will  observe  that  all 
that  is  wonderful  in  this  tale  is  the  result  of 
of  external  circumstances — of  things  which 
fortune  brings  to  Crusoe's  hand. 


NOTES  ON   ROBINSON  CRUSOE.* 

Vol.  i.  p.  17.  But  my  ill  fate  pushed  me  on  now  with  an 
obstinacy  that  nothing  could  resist ;  and  though  I  had  several 
times  loud  calls  from  my  reason,  and  my  more  composed 
judgment  to  go  home,  yet  I  had  no  power  to  do  it.  I  know 
not  what  to  call  this,  nor  will  I  urge  that  it  is  a  secret  over- 
ruling decree  that  hurries  us  on  to  be  the  instruments  of  our 
own  destruction,  even  though  it  be  before  us,  and  that  we 
rush  upon  it  with  our  eyes  open. 

*  These  notes  were  written  by  Mr.  C.  in  Mr.  Gillman's 
copy  of  Robinson  Crusoe,  in  the  summer  of  1830.  The  refe- 
rences in  the  text  are  to  Major's  edition,  1831.     £d. 


100  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

The  wise  only  possess  ideas ;    the  greater 
part  of  mankind  are  possessed  by  them.     Ro- 
binson Crusoe  was  not  conscious  of  the  master 
impulse,  even  because  it  was  his  master,  and 
had  taken,  as  he  says,  full  possession  of  him. 
When  once  the  mind,  in  despite  of  the  remon- 
strating conscience,   has  abandoned  its   free 
power  to  a   haunting   impulse  or   idea,  then 
whatever  tends  to  give  depth  and  vividness  to 
this  idea  or  indefinite  imagination,  increases  its 
despotism,  and  in  the  same  proportion  renders 
the  reason   and  free  will   ineffectual.      Now, 
fearful  calamities,  sufferings,  horrors,  and  hair- 
breadth escapes  will  have  this  effect,  far  more 
than  even  sensual  pleasure  and  prosperous  in- 
cidents.    Hence  the  evil  consequences  of  sin 
in  such  cases,  instead  of  retracting  or  deterring 
the  sinner,  goad  him  on  to  his    destruction. 
This  is  the  moral  of  Shakspeare's  Macbeth, 
and  the  true  solution  of  this  paragraph, — not 
any  overruling  decree  of  divine  wrath,  but  the 
tyranny  of  the  sinner's  own  evil  imagination, 
which  he  has  voluntarily  chosen  as  his  master. 
Compare  the  contemptuous  Swift  with  the 
contemned  De  Foe,  and  how  superior  will  the 
latter  be  found  !  But  by  what  test? — Even  by 
this ;   that  the  writer  who  makes  me  sympa- 
thize with  his  presentations  with  the  whole  of 
my  being,  is  more  estimable  than  lie  who  calls 
forth,  and  appeals  but  to,  a  part  of  my  being — 
my  sense  of  the  ludicrous,  for  instance.     De 
Foe's  excellence  it  is,  to  make  me  forget  my 


LECTURE  XI.  191 

specific  class,  character,  and  circumstances, 
and  to  raise  me  while  1  read  him,  into  the  uni- 
versal man. 

P.  80.  I  smiled  to  myself  at  the  sight  of  this  money  : 
"  O  drug  !"  said  I  aloud,  &c.  However,  iqjon  second  thoughts ^ 
I  took  it  away  ;  and  wrapping  all  this  in  a  piece  of  canvass,  Sec. 

Worthy  of  Shakspeare  ! — and  yet  the  simple 
semicolon  after  it,  the  instant  passing  on  with- 
out the  least  pause  of  reflex  consciousness,  is 
more  exquisite  and  masterlike  than  the  touch 
itself.  A  meaner  writer,  a  Marmontel,  would 
have  put  an  (!)  after  '  away,''  and  have  com- 
menced a  fresh  paragraph.     30th  July,  1830. 

P.  111.  And  I  must  confess,  my  religious  thankfulness  to 
God's  providence  began  to  abate  too,  upon  the  discovering 
that  all  this  was  nothing  but  what  was  common  ;  though  I 
ought  to  have  been  as  thankful  for  so  strange  and  unforeseen 
a  providence,  as  if  it  had  been  miraculous. 

To  make  men  feel  the  truth  of  this  is  one 
characteristic  object  of  the  miracles  worked 
by  Moses ; — in  them  the  providence  is  mira- 
culous, the  miracles  providential. 

P.  126.  The  growing  up  of  the  corn,  as  is  hinted  in  my 
Journal,  had,  at  first,  some  little  influence  upon  me,  and  be- 
gan to  affect  me  with  seriousness,  as  long  as  I  thought  it  had 
something  miraculous  in  it,  &c. 

By  far  the  ablest  vindication  of  miracles 
which  I  have  met  with.  It  is  indeed  the  true 
ground,  the  proper  purpose  and  intention  of  a 
miracle. 


192  COURSE  OF  LFXTURKS. 

P.  141 .  To  think  that  this  was  all  my  own,  that  I  was  king 
and  lord  of  all  tliis  country  indcfeasibly,  &c. 

By  the  by,  what  is  the  law  of  England  res- 
pecting this?  Suppose  I  had  discovered,  or 
been  wrecked  on  an  uninhabited  island,  would 
it  be  mine  or  the  king's  ? 

P.  223.  I  considered — that  as  I  could  not  foresee  what 
the  ends  of  divine  wisdom  might  be  in  all  this,  so  I  was  not 
to  dispute  his  sovereignty,  who,  as  I  was  his  creature,  had  an 
undoubted  right,  by  creation,  to  govern  and  dispose  of  me  ab- 
solutely as  he  thought  fit,  &c. 

I  could  never  understand  this  reasoning, 
grounded  on  a  complete  misapprehension  of 
St.  PauFs  image  of  the  potter,  Rom.  ix.,  or 
rather  I  do  fully  understand  the  absurdity 
of  it.  The  susceptibility  of  pain  and  plea- 
sure, of  good  and  evil,  constitutes  a  right  in 
every  creature  endowed  therewith  in  relation 
to  every  rational  and  moral  being, — a  fortiori, 
therefore,  to  the  Supreme  Reason,  to  the  abso- 
lutely good  Being.  Remember  Davenant's 
verses ; — 

Doth  it  our  reason's  mutinies  appease 
To  say,  the  potter  may  his  own  clay  mould 
To  every  use,  or  in  what  shape  he  please, 
At  first  not  counsell'd,  nor  at  last  controU'd? 

Power's  hand  can  neither  easy  be,  nor  strict 
To  lifeless  clay,  which  ease  nor  torment  knows, 
And  where  it  cannot  favour  or  afflict. 
It  neither  justice  or  injustice  shows. 

But  souls  have  life,  and  life  eternal  too: 
Therefore,  if  doom'd  before  they  can  offend, 


LECTURE  XI.  193 

It  seems  to  show  what  heavenly  power  can  do, 
But  does  not  in  that  deed  that  power  commend. 

Death  of  Astragon.  st.  88,  &c. 

P.  232-3.  And  this  I  must  observe  with  grief  too,  that  the 
discomposure  of  my  mind  had  too  great  impressions  also  upon 
the  religious  parts  of  my  thoughts, — praying  to  God  being 
properly  an  act  of  the  mind,  not  of  the  body. 

As  justly  conceived  as  it  is  beautifully  ex- 
pressed. And  a  mighty  motive  for  habitual 
prayer ;  for  this  cannot  but  greatly  facilitate 
the  performance  of  rational  prayer  even  in 
moments  of  urgent  distress. 

P.  244.  That  this  would  justify  the  conduct  of  the  Spa- 
niards in  all  their  barbarities  practised  in  America. 

De  Foe  was  a  true  philanthropist,  who  had 
risen  above  the  antipathies  of  nationality  ;  but 
he  was  evidently  partial  to  the  Spanish  cha- 
racter, which,  however,  it  is  not,  I  fear,  pos- 
sible to  acquit  of  cruelty.  Witness  the  Nether- 
lands, the  Inquisition,  the  late  Guerilla  war- 
fare, &c. 

P.  249.  That  I  shall  not  discuss,  and  perhaps  cannot  ac- 
count for ;  but  certainly  they  are  a  proof  of  the  converse  of 
spirits,  &c. 

This  reminds  me  of  a  conversation  I  once 
over  heard.  "  How  a  statement  so  injurious 
to  Mr.  A.  and  so  contrary  to  the  truth,  should 
have  been  made  to  you  by  Mr.  B.  I  do  not 
pretend  to  account  for ; — only  I  know  of  my 
own  knowledge  that  B.  is  an  inveterate  liar, 
and  has  long  borne  malice  against  Mr.  A. ; 
and  I  can  prove  that  he  has  repeatedly  dc- 

VOL.  I.  o 


194  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

clared  that  in  some  way  or  other  he  would  do 
Mr.  A.  a  mischief." 

P.  254.  The  place  I  was  in  was  a  most  delightful  cavity 
or  grotto  of  its  kind,  as  could  be  expected,  though  perfectly 
dark ;  the  floor  was  dry  and  level,  and  had  a  sort  of  small 
loose  gravel  on  it,  &c. 

How  accurate  an  observer  of  nature  De 
Foe  was !  The  reader  will  at  once  recognize 
Professor  Buckland's  caves  and  the  diluvial 
gravel. 

P.  308.  I  entered  into  a  long  discourse  with  him  about 
the  devil,  the  original  of  him,  his  rebellion  against  God,  his 
enmity  to  man,  the  reason  of  it,  his  setting  himself  up  in  the 
dark  parts  of  the  world  to  be  worshipped  instead  of  God,  &c. 

I  presume  that  Milton's  Paradise  Lost  must 
have  been  bound  up  with  one  of  Crusoe's 
Bibles  :  otherwise  I  should  be  puzzled  to  know 
where  he  found  all  this  history  of  the  Old 
Gentleman.  Not  a  word  of  it  in  the  Bible 
itself,  I  am  quite  sure.  But  to  be  serious.  De 
Foe  did  not  reflect  that  all  these  difficulties  are 
attached  to  a  mere  fiction,  or,  at  the  best,  an 
allegory,  supported  by  a  few  popular  phrases 
and  figures  of  speech  used  incidentally  or  dra- 
matically by  the  Evangelists, — and  that  the 
existence  of  a  personal,  intelligent,  evil  being, 
the  counterpart  and  antagonist  of  God,  is  in 
direct  contradiction  to  the  most  express  decla- 
rations of  Holy  Writ.  "  Shall  there  he  evil 
in  a  city,  and  the  Lord  hath  not  done  it  ?" 
Amos,  iii.  6.  "  /  make  peace  and  create  evil.'' 
Isa.  xlv.  7.  This  is  the  deep  mystery  of  the 
abyss  of  God. 


LECTURE  XI.  195 

Vol.  ii.  p.  3.  I  have  often  heard  persons  of  good  judgment 
say,  *  *  *  that  there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  spirit  appear- 
ing, a  ghost  walking,  and  the  like,  &c. 

I  cannot  conceive  a  better  definition  of  Body 
than  "  spirit  appearing,"  or  of  a  flesh-and-blood 
man  than  a  rational  spirit  apparent.  But  a 
spirit  2^er  se  appearing  is  tantamount  to  a  spirit 
appearing  without  its  appearances.  And  as  for 
ghosts,  it  is  enough  for  a  man  of  common  sense 
to  observe,  that  a  ghost  and  a  shadow  are  con- 
cluded in  the  same  definition,  that  is,  visibility 
without  tangibility. 

P.  9.  She  was,  in  a  few  words  the  stay  of  all  ray  affairs, 
the  centre  of  all  my  enterprises,  &c. 

The  stay  of  his  affairs,  the  centre  of  his  in- 
terests, the  regulator  of  his  schemes  and  move- 
ments, whom  it  soothed  his  pride  to  submit  to, 
and  in  complying  Avith  whose  wishes  the  con- 
scions  sensation  of  his  acting  will  increased  the 
impulse,  while  it  disguised  the  coercion,  of 
duty  ! — the  clinging  dependent,  yet  the  strong 
supporter — the  comforter,  the  comfort,  and  the 
soul's  living  home  !  This  is  De  Foe's  compre- 
hensive character  of  the  wife,  as  she  should  be; 
and,  to  the  honour  of  womanhood  be  it  spo- 
ken, there  are  few  neighbourhoods  in  which 
one  name  at  least  might  not  be  found  for  the 
portrait. 

The  exquisite  paragraphs  in  this  and  the 
next  page,  in  addition  to  others  scattered, 
though  with  a  sparing  hand,  through  his  novels. 


lOG  (OURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

afford  sufficient  proof  that  De  Foe  was  a  first- 
rate  master  of  periodic  style  ;  but  with  sound 
nidgment,  and  the  fine  tact  of  genius,  he  has 
avoided  it  as  adverse  to,  nay,  incompatible 
with,  the  every-day  matter  of  fact  realness, 
which  forms  the  charm  and  the  character  of  all 
his  romances.  The  Robinson  Crusoe  is  like  the 
vision  of  a  happy  night-mair,  such  as  a  denizen 
of  Elysium  might  be  supposed  to  have  from  a 
little  excess  in  his  nectar  and  ambrosia  supper. 
Our  imagination  is  kept  in  full  play,  excited  to 
the  highest ;  yet  all  the  while  we  are  touching, 
or  touched  by,  common  flesh  and  blood. 

P.  67.     The  ungrateful  creatures  began  to  be  as  insolent 
and  troublesome  as  before,  &c. 

How  should  it  be  otherwise?  They  were 
idle ;  and  when  we  will  not  sow  corn,  the 
devil  will  be  sure  to  sow  weeds,  night-shade, 
henbane,  and  deviFs-bit. 

P,  82.     That  hardened  villain  was  so  far  from  denying  it, 

that  he  said  it  was  true,  and him  they  would  do  it 

still  before  they  had  done  with  them. 

Observe  when  a  man  has  once  abandoned 
himself  to  wickedness,  he  cannot  stop,  and 
does  not  join  the  devils  till  he  has  become  a 
devil  himself.  Rebelling  against  his  consci- 
ence he  becomes  the  slave  of  his  own  furious 
will. 

One  excellence  of  De  Foe,  amongst  many,  is 
his  sacrifice  of  lesser  interest  to  the  greater 
because  more  miiversal.     Had  he  (as  without 


LECTURE  XI.  197 

any  improbability  he  might  have  done)  given 
his  Robinson  Crusoe  any  of  the  turn  for  na- 
tural history,  which  forms  so  striking  and  de- 
lightful a  feature  in  the  equally  uneducated 
Dampier ; — had  he  made  him  find  out  qualities 
and  uses  in  the  before  (to  him)  unknown  plants 
of  the  island,  discover,  for  instance,  a  substi- 
tute for  hops,  or  describe  birds,  &c. — many 
delightful  pages  and  incidents  might  have 
enriched  the  book; — but  then  Crusoe  would 
have  ceased  to  be  the  universal  representative, 
the  person,  for  whom  every  reader  could  sub- 
stitute himself.  But  now  nothing  is  done, 
thought,  suffered,  or  desired,  but  what  every 
man  can  imagine  himself  doing,  thinking,  feel- 
ing, or  wishing  for.  Even  so  very  easy  a 
problem  as  that  of  finding  a  substitute  for  ink, 
is  with  exquisite  judgment  made  to  bafile  Cru- 
soe's inventive  faculties.  And  in  what  he 
does,  he  arrives  at  no  excellence ;  he  does  not 
make  basket  work  like  Will  Atkins ;  the  car- 
pentering, tailoring,  pottery,  &c.  are  all  just 
Avhat  will  answer  his  purposes,  and  those  are 
confined  to  needs  that  all  men  have,  and  com- 
forts that  all  men  desire.  Crusoe  rises  only 
to  the  point  to  which  all  men  may  be  made  to 
feel  that  they  might,  and  that  they  ought  to, 
rise  in  religion, — to  resignation,  dependence 
on,  and  thankful  acknowledgment  of,  the 
divine  mercy  and  goodness. 


198  COURSE  OF  LECTUUES. 

Ill  the  education  of  children,  love  is  first  to 
be  instilled,  and  out  of  love  obedience  is  to  be 
educed.     Then  impulse  and  power  should  be 
given  to  the  intellect,  and  the  ends  of  a  moral 
being  be  exhibited.    For  this  object  thus  much 
is  effected  by  works  of  imagination  ; — that  they 
carry  the  mind  out  of  self,  and  show  the  pos- 
sible of  the  good  and  the  great  in  the  human 
character.     The  height,  whatever  it  may  be, 
of  the  imaginative  standard  will  do  no  harm  ; 
we    are  commanded   to   imitate   one    who    is 
inimitable.     We  should  address  ourselves  to 
those  faculties  in  a  child's  mind,  which  are 
first  awakened  by  nature,  and  consequently 
first  admit  of  cultivation,  that  is  to  say,  the 
memory  and  the  imagination.    The  comparing 
power,  the  judgment,  is  not  at  that  age  active, 
and  ought  not  to  be  forcibly  excited,  as  is  too 
frequently  and  mistakenly  done  in  the  modern 
systems  of  education,  which  can  only  lead  to 
selfish  views,  debtor   and  creditor  principles 
of  virtue,  and  an  inflated  sense  of  merit.     In 
the  imagination   of  man   exist  the  seeds   of 
all  moral  and  scientific   improvement ;    che- 
mistry was  first  alchemy,  and  out  of  astrology 
sprang  astronomy.     In  the  childhood  of  those 
sciences  the  imagination  opened  a  way,  and 
furnished    materials,    on    which    the    ratioci- 
native  powers  in  a  maturer  state  operated  m  ith 
success.     The  imagination  is  the  distinguish- 
ing  characteristic   of  man    as   a  progressive 
being ;  and  I  repeat  that  it  ought  to  be  care- 


LECTURE  XI.  199 

fully  guided  and  strengthened  as  the  indispen- 
sable means  and  instrument  of  continued  ame- 
lioration and  refinement.  Men  of  genius  and 
goodness  are  generally  restless  in  their  minds 
in  the  present,  and  this,  because  they  are  by  a 
law  of  their  nature  unremittingly  regarding 
themselves  in  the  future,  and  contemplating 
the  possible  of  moral  and  intellectual  advance 
towards  perfection.  Thus  we  live  by  hope 
and  faith  ;  thus  we  are  for  the  most  part  able 
to  realize  what  we  will,  and  thus  we  accom- 
plish the  end  of  our  being.  The  contempla- 
tion of  futurity  inspires  humility  of  soul  in  our 
judgment  of  the  present. 

1  think  the  memory  of  children  cannot,  iii 
reason,  be  too  much  stored  with  the  objects 
and  facts  of  natural  history.  God  opens  the 
images  of  nature,  like  the  leaves  of  a  book, 
before  the  eyes  of  his  creature,  Man — and 
teaches  him  all  that  is  grand  and  beautiful  in 
the  foaming  cataract,  the  glassy  lake,  and  the 
floating  mist. 

The  common  modern  novel,  in  which  there 
is  no  imagination,  but  a  miserable  struggle  to 
excite  and  gratify  mere  curiosity,  ought,  in  my 
judgment,  to  be  wholly  forbidden  to  children. 
Novel-reading  of  this  sort  is  especially  injurious 
to  the  growth  of  the  imagination,  the  judg- 
ment, and  the  morals,  especially  to  the  latter, 
because  it  excites  mere  feelings  without  at  the 
same  time  ministering  an  impulse  to  action. 
Women    are    good    novelists,    but    indilierent 


200  C  OURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

poets ;  and  this  because  they  rarely  or  never 
tlioroughly  disthiguish  between  fact  and  fiction. 
In  the  jumble  of  the  two  lies  the  secret  of  the 
modern  novel,  which  is  the  medium  aliquid 
between  them,  having  just  so  much  of  fiction 
as  to  obscure  the  fact,  and  so  much  of  fact  as 
to  render  the  fiction  insipid.  The  perusal  of  a 
fashionable  lady's  novel  is  to  me  very  much 
like  looking  at  the  scenery  and  decorations  of 
a  theatre  by  broad  daylight.  The  source  of 
the  common  fondness  for  novels  of  this  sort 
rests  in  that  dislike  of  vacancy  and  that  love  of 
sloth,  which  are  inherent  in  the  human  mind  ; 
they  afford  excitement  without  producing  re- 
action. By  reaction  I  mean  an  activity  of  the 
intellectual  faculties,  which  shows  itself  in 
consequent  reasoning  and  observation,  and  ori- 
ginates action  and  conduct  according  to  a  prin- 
ciple. Thus,  the  act  of  thinking  presents  two 
sides  for  contemplation, — that  of  external  caus- 
ality, in  which  the  train  of  thought  may  be 
considered  as  the  result  of  outward  impressions, 
of  accidental  combinations,  of  fancy,  or  the 
associations  of  the  memory, — and  on  the  other 
hand,  that  of  internal  causality,  or  of  the 
energy  of  the  will  on  the  mind  itself.  Thought, 
therefore,  might  thus  be  regarded  as  passive  or 
active;  and  the  same  faculties  may  in  a  popular 
sense  be  expressed  as  perception  or  obser- 
vation, fancy  or  imagination,  memory  or  recol- 
lection. 


201 


LECTURE  XII. 

DREAMS — APPARITIONS — ALCHEMISTS  —  PER- 
SONALITY OF  THE  EVIL  BEING 

BODILY  IDENTITY. 

It  is  a  general,  but,  as  it  appears  to  me,  a 
mistaken  opinion,  that  in  our  ordinary  dreams 
we  judge  the  objects  to  be  real.  I  say  our 
ordinary  dreams ; — because  as  to  the  night- 
mair  the  opinion  is  to  a  considerable  extent 
just.  But  the  night-mair  is  not  a  mere  dream, 
but  takes  place  when  the  waking  state  of  the 
brain  is  recommencing,  and  most  often  during 
a  rapid  alternation,  a  twinkling,  as  it  were,  of 
sleeping  and  waking ; — while  either  from  pres- 
sure on,  or  from  some  derangement  in,  the 
stomach  or  other  digestive  organs  acting  on 
the  external  skin  (which  is  still  in  sympathy 
with  the  stomach  and  bowels,)  and  benumbing 
it,  the  sensations  sent  ujd  to  the  brain  by  double 
touch  (that  is,  when  my  own  hand  touches  my 
side  or  breast,)  are  so  faint  as  to  be  merely 
equivalent  to  the  sensation  given  by  single 
touch,  as  when  another  person's  hand  touches 
me.  The  mind,  therefore,  which  at  all  times, 
with  and  without  our  distinct  consciousness, 
seeks  for,  and  assumes,  some  outward  cause 


202  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

Ibr  every  impression  from  without,  and  which 
in  sleep,  by  aid  of  the  imaginative  faculty, 
converts  its  judgments  respecting  the  cause 
into  a  personal  image  as  being  the  cause, — 
the  mind,  I  say,  in  this  case,  deceived  by 
past  experience,  attributes  the  painful  sensa- 
tion received  to  a  correspondent  agent, — an 
assassin,  for  instance,  stabbing  at  the  side,  or 
a  goblin  sitting  on  the  breast.  Add  too  that 
the  impressions  of  the  bed,  curtains,  room,  &c. 
received  by  the  eyes  in  the  half-moments  of 
their  opening,  blend  with,  and  give  vividness 
and  appropriate  distance  to,  the  dream  image 
which  returns  w  hen  they  close  again ;  and 
thus  we  unite  the  actual  perceptions,  or  their 
immediate  reliques,  with  the  phantoms  of  the 
inward  sense  ;  and  in  this  manner  so  confound 
the  half-waking,  half-sleeping, reasoning  power, 
that  we  actually  do  pass  a  positive  judgment 
on  the  reality  of  what  we  see  and  hear,  though 
often  accompanied  by  doubt  and  self-question- 
ing, which,  as  I  have  myself  experienced,  will 
at  times  become  strong  enough,  even  before 
we  awake,  to  convince  us  that  it  is  what  it  is — 
namely,  the  night-mair. 

In  ordinary  dreams  we  do  not  judge  the 
objects  to  be  real ; — we  simply  do  not  deter- 
mine that  they  are  unreal.  The  sensations 
which  they  seem  to  produce,  are  in  truth  the 
causes  and  occasions  of  the  images  ;  of  which 
there  are  two  obvious  proofs:  first,  that  in 
dreams  the  strangest  and  most  sudden  meta- 


LECTURE  XII.  203 

morphoses  do  not  create  any  sensation  of  sur- 
prise:    and  the  second,  that   as  to  the  most 
dreadful  images,  which  during  the  dream  were 
accompanied  with  agonies  of  terror,  we  merely 
awake,  or  turn  round  on  the  other  side,  and 
off  fly  both  image   and   agony,  which  would 
be  impossible  if  the  sensations  were  produced 
by  the  images.     This  has  always  appeared  to 
me  an  absolute  demonstration  of  the  true  na- 
ture of  ghosts  and  apparitions — such  I  mean 
of   the   tribe   as   were   not    pure   inventions. 
Fifty  years  ago,  (and  to  this  day  in  the  ruder 
parts  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  in  almost 
every  kitchen  and  in  too  many  parlours  it  is 
nearly  the  same,)  you  might  meet  persons  who 
would  assure  you  in  the  most  solemn  manner, 
so  that   you   could  not  doubt  their  veracity 
at  least,  that  they  had  seen  an  apparition  of 
such  and  such  a  person, — in  many  cases,  that 
the  apparition  had  spoken  to  them  ;  and  they 
would  describe  themselves  as  having  been  in 
an  agony  of  terror.     They  would  tell  you  the 
story  in  perfect  health.     Now  take  the  other 
class  of  facts,  in  which  real  ghosts  have  ap- 
peared ; — I   mean,  where  figures    have   been 
dressed  up  for  the  purpose  of  passing  for  appa- 
ritions : — in  every  instance  I  have  known  or 
heard  of  (and  I  have  collected  very  many) 
the  consequence  has  been  either  sudden  death, 
or  fits,  or  idiocy,  or  mania,  or  a  brain  fever. 
Whence  comes  the  difference  ?  evidently  from 
this, — that  in  the  one  case  the  whole  of  the 


204  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

nervous  system  has  been  by  slight  internal 
causes  gradually  and  all  together  brought  into 
a  certain  state,  the  sensation  of  which  is  extra- 
vagantly exaggerated  during  sleep,  and  of 
which  the  images  are  the  mere  effects  and 
exponents,  as  the  motions  of  the  weather- 
cock are  of  the  wind  ; — while  in  the  other 
case,  the  image  rushing  through  the  senses 
upon  a  nervous  system,  wholly  unprepared, 
actually  causes  the  sensation,  which  is  some- 
times j^owerful  enough  to  produce  a  total 
check,  and  almost  always  a  lesion  or  inflamma- 
tion. Who  has  not  witnessed  the  difference  in 
shock  when  we  have  leaped  down  half-a-dozen 
steps  intentionally,  and  that  of  having  missed 
a  single  stair.  How  comparatively  severe  the 
latter  is  !  The  fact  really  is,  as  to  apparitions, 
that  the  terror  produces  the  image  instead  of 
the  contrary  ;  for  in  omnem  actum  pe?'ceptioms 
injiuit  imagiuatio,  as  says  Wolfe. 

O,  strange  is  the  self-power  of  the  imagina- 
tion— when  painful  sensations  have  made  it 
their  interpreter,  or  returning  gladsomeness 
or  convalescence  has  made  its  chilled  and 
evanished  figures  and  landscape  bud,  blossom, 
and  live  in  scarlet,  green,  and  snowy  white 
(like  the  fire-screen  inscribed  with  the  nitrate 
and  muriate  of  cobalt,)— strange  is  the  power  to 
represent  the  events  and  circumstances,  even 
to  the  anguish  or  the  triumph  of  the  quasi-cre- 
dent soul,  while  the  necessary  conditions,  the 
only   possible    causes   of  such  contingencies, 


LECTURE  XII.  205 

are  known  to  be  in  fact  quite  hopeless  ; — yea, 
when  the  pure  mind  would  recoil  from  the 
eve-lengthened  shadow  of  an  approaching 
hope,  as  from  a  crime ; — and  yet  the  eftect 
shall  have  place,  and  substance,  and  living 
energy,  and,  on  a  blue  islet  of  ether,  in  a  whole 
sky  of  blackest  cloudage,  shine  like  a  firstling 
of  creation  ! 

To  return,  however  to  apparitions,  and  by 
way  of  an  amusing  illustration  of  the  nature 
and  value  of  even  contemporary  testimony 
upon  such  subjects,  I  will  present  you  with  a 
passage,  literally  translated  by  my  friend,  Mr. 
South ey,  from  the  well  known  work  of  Bernal 
Dias,  one  of  the  companions  of  Cortes,  in  the 
conquest  of  Mexico  : 

Here  it  is  that  Gomara  says,  that  Francisco  de  Morla  rode 
forward  on  a  dappled  grey  horse,  before  Cortes  and  the 
cavalry  came  up,  and  that  the  apostle  St.  lago,  or  St.  Peter, 
was  there.  I  must  say  that  all  our  works  and  victories  are 
by  the  hand  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  and  that  in  this  battle 
there  were  for  each  of  us  so  many  Indians,  that  they  could 
have  covered  us  with  handfuls  of  earth,  if  it  had  not  been  that 
the  great  mercy  of  God  helped  us  in  every  thing.  And  it 
may  be  that  he  of  whom  Gomara  speaks,  was  the  glorious 
Santiago  or  San  Pedro,  and  I,  as  a  sinner,  was  not  worthy  to 
see  him  ;  but  he  whom  I  saw  there  and  knew,  was  Francisco 
de  Morla  on  a  chesnut  horse,  who  came  up  with  Cortes. 
And  it  seems  to  me  that  now  while  I  am  writing  this,  the 
whole  war  is  represented  before  these  sinful  eyes,  just  in  the 
manner  as  we  then  went  through  it.  And  though  I,  as  an 
unworthy  sinner,  might  not  deserve  to  see  either  of  these  glo- 
rious apostles,  there  were  in  our  company  above  four  hundred 
soldiers,  and  Cortes,  and  many  other  knights ;  and  it  would 
have  been  talked  of  and  testified,  and  they  would  have  made 


'200  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

a  churcli,  wlien  they  peopled  the  town,  which  would  have 
been  called  Santiago  de  la  Vittoria,  or  San  Pedro  de  la 
Vittoria,  as  it  is  now  called,  Santa  Maria  de  la  Vittoria.  And 
if  it  was,  as  Gomara  says,  bad  Christians  must  we  have  been, 
when  our  Lord  God  sent  us  his  holy  apostles,  not  to  acknow- 
ledge his  great  mercy,  and  venerate  his  church  daily.  And 
would  to  God,  it  had  been,  as  the  Chronicler  says ! — but  till 
I  read  his  Chronicle,  I  never  heard  such  a  thing  from  any  of 
the  conquerors  who  were  there. 

Now,  what  if  the  odd  accident  of  such  a 
man  as  Bernal  Dias'  writing  a  history  had  not 
taken  place  !  Gomara's  account,  the  account  of 
a  contemporary,  which  yet  must  have  been 
read  by  scores  who  were  present,  would 
have  remained  uncontradicted.  I  remember 
the  story  of  a  man,  whom  the  devil  met  and 
talked  with,  but  left  at  a  particular  lane ; — the 
man  followed  him  with  his  eyes,  and  when  the 
devil  got  to  the  turning  or  bend  of  the  lane,  he 
vanished !  The  devil  was  upon  this  occasion 
drest  in  a  blue  coat,  plush  waistcoat,  leather 
breeches  and  boots,  and  talked  and  looked  just 
like  a  common  man,  except  as  to  a  particular 
lock  of  hair  which  he  had.  "  And  how  do  you 
know  then  that  it  was  the  devil?" — "  How  do 
I  know,"  replied  the  fellow, — "  why,  if  it  had 
not  been  the  devil,  being  drest  as  he  was,  and 
looking  as  he  did,  why  should  I  have  been 
sore  stricken  with  fright,  when  I  first  saw  him  ? 
and  why  should  I  be  in  such  a  tremble  all  the 
while  he  talked?  And,  moreover,  he  had  a 
particular  sort  of  a  kind  of  a  lock,  and  when 
I  groaned  and  said,  upon  every  question  he 
asked  me.   Lord  have  mercy  upon  me !    or, 


LECTURE  XII.  207 

Christ  have  mercy  upon  me!  it  was  plain 
enough  that  he  did  not  like  it,  and  so  he  left 
nie !"— The  man  was  quite  sober  when  he  re- 
lated this  story  ;  but  as  it  happened  to  him  on 
his  return  from  market,  it  is  probable  that  he 
was  then  muddled.  As  for  myself,  I  was 
actually  seen  in  Newgate  in  the  winter  of 
1798  . — the  person  who  saw  me  there,  said  he 
had  asked  my  name  of  Mr.  A.  B.  a  known  ac- 
quaintance of  mine,  who  told  him  that  it  was 
young  Coleridge,  who  had  married  the  eldest 

j\Iiss .     "  Will  you  go  to  Newgate,  Sir  ?" 

said  my  friend  ;  "  for  I  assure  yon  that  Mr.  C. 
is  now  in  Germany."  "  Very  willingly,"  re- 
plied the  other,  and  away  they  went  to  New- 
gate, and  sent  for  A.  B.  "  Coleridge,"  cried 
he,  "  in  Newgate  !  God  forbid  !"  I  said,  '*  young 

Col who  married  the  eldest  Miss ." 

The  names  were  something  similar.  And  yet 
this  person  had  himself  really  seen  me  at  one 
of  my  lectures. 

I  remember,  upon  the  occasion  of  my  inha- 
ling the  nitrous  oxide  at  the  Royal  Institution, 
about  five  minutes  afterwards,  a  gentleman 
came  from  the  other  side  of  the  theatre  and 
said  to  me, — "  Was  it  not  ravishingly  delight- 
ful, Sir?" — "  It  was  highly  pleasurable,  no 
doubt." — "  Was  it  not  very  like  sweet  music  ?" 
— "  I  cannot  say  I  perceived  any  analogy  to 
it." — "  Did  you  not  say  it  was  very  like  Mrs. 
Billington  singing  by  your  ear?" — "  No,  Sir, 
I  said  that  while  I  was  breathing  the  gas, 
there  was  a  singing  in  my  ears." 


208  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

To  return,  however,  to  dreams,  I  not  only 
believe,  for  the  reasons  given,  but  have  more 
than  once  actually  experienced  that  the  most 
fearful  forms,  when  produced  simply  by  asso- 
ciation, instead  of  causing  fear,  operate  no 
other  effect  than  the  same  would  do  if  they 
had  passed  through  my  mind  as  thoughts, 
while  I  was  composing  a  faery  tale ;  the 
whole  depending  on  the  wise  and  gracious  law 
in  our  nature,  that  the  actual  bodily  sensations, 
called  forth  according  to  the  law  of  association 
by  thoughts  and  images  of  the  mind,  never 
greatly  transcend  the  limits  of  pleasurable 
feeling  in  a  tolerably  healthy  frame,  unless 
where  an  act  of  the  judgment  supervenes  and 
interprets  them  as  purporting  instant  danger 
to  ourselves. 

*  There  have  been  very  strange  and  incredible 
stories  told  of  and  by  the  alchemists.  Per- 
haps in  some  of  them  there  may  have  been  a 
specific  form  of  mania,  originating  in  the  con- 
stant intension  of  the  mind  on  an  imaginary 
end,  associated  with  an  immense  variety  of 
means,  all  of  them  substances  not  familiar  to 
men  in  general,  and  in  forms  strange  and  un- 
like to  those  of  ordinary  nature.  Sometimes, 
it  seems  as  if  the  alchemists  wrote  like  the 
Pythagoreans  on  music,  imagining  a  meta- 
physical and  inaudible  music  as  the  basis  of 
the  audible.     It  is  clear  that  by  sulphur  they 

*  From  Mr.  Green's  note.     Ed. 


LECTUKE  XII.  209 

meant  the  solar  rays  or  light,  and  by  mercury 
the  principle  of  ponderability,  so  that  their 
theory  was  the  same  with  that  of  the  Hera- 
clitic  physics,  or  the  modern  German  Natnr- 
phUosophie,  which  deduces  all  things  from  light 
and  gravitation,  each  being  bipolar ;  gravi- 
tation =north  and  south,  or  attraction  and  re- 
pulsion ;  light=east  and  west,  or  contraction 
and  dilation  ;  and  gold  being  the  tetrad,  or  in- 
terpenetration  of  both,  as  water  was  the  dyad 
of  light,  and  iron  the  dyad  of  gravitation. 

It  is,  probably,  unjust  to  accuse  the  alche- 
mists generally  of  dabbling  with  attempts  at 
maffic  in  the  common  sense  of  the  term.     The 
supposed  exercise  of  magical   power   always 
involved   some  moral  guilt,  directly  or   indi- 
rectly, as  in  stealing  a  piece  of  meat  to  lay  on 
warts,  touching  humours  with  the  hand  of  an 
executed  person,  &c.     Rites  of  this  sort  and 
other  practices  of  sorcery  have   always  been 
regarded    with    trembling    abhorrence    by   all 
luitions,  even  the  most   ignorant,  as    by   the 
Africans,  the  Hudson's  Bay  people  and  others. 
The  alchemists  were,  no  doubt,  often  consi- 
dered as  dealers  in   art  magic,  and  many  of 
them   were  not  unwilling  that  such   a  belief 
should   be  prevalent;    and   the  more  earnest 
among  them  evidently   looked  at  their  asso- 
ciation of  substances,  fumigations,  and  other 
chemical  operations  as  merely  ceremonial,  and 
seem,  therefore,  to  have  had  a  deeper  meaning, 
that  of  evoking  a  latent  power.     Tt  would  be 

VOL,  I.  V 


210  COURSK  OF  LECTURES. 

])rofitable  to  make  a  collection  of  all  the  cases 
of  cures  by  magical  charms  and  incantations ; 
much  useful  information  might,  probably,  be 
derived  from  it ;  for  it  is  to  be  observed  that 
such  rites  are  the  form  in  which  medical 
knowledge  would  be  preserved  amongst  a  bar- 
barous and  ignorant  people. 

Note.*     June,  1827. 

The  apocryphal  book  of  Tobit  consists  of 
a  very  simple,  but  beautiful  and  interesting, 
family-memoir,  into  which  some  later  Jewish 
poet  or  fabulist  of  Alexandria  wove  the  ridicu- 
lous and  frigid  machinery,  borrowed  from  the 
popular  superstitions  of  the  Greeks  (though, 
probably,  of  Egyptian  origin),  and  accommo- 
dated, clumsily  enough,  to  the  purer  mono- 
theism of  the  Mosaic  law.  The  Rape  of  the 
Lock  is  another  instance  of  a  simple  tale  thus 
enlarged  at  a  later  period,  though  in  this  case 
by  the  same  author,  and  with  a  very  different 
result.  Now  unless  Mr.  Hillhouse  is  Romanist 
enough  to  receive  this  nursery-tale  garnish  of 
a  domestic  incident  as  grave  history  and  holy 
writ,  (for  which,  even  from  learned  Roman 
Catholics,  he  would  gain  more  credit  as  a  very 
obedient  child  of  the  Church  than  as  a  biblical 
critic),  he  will  find  it  no  easy  matter  to  sup- 
port this  assertion  of  his  by  the  passages  of 
Scripture  here  referred  to,  consistently   with 

*  Written  in  a  copy  of  Mr.  Hillhouse's  Hadad.     Ed. 


LECTURE  XII.  2]  1 

any  sane  interpretation  of  their  import   and 
purpose. 

I.  The  Fallen  Spirits. 

This  is  the  mythological  form,  or,  if  yon 
will,  the  symbolical  representation,  of  a  pro- 
found idea  necessary  as  the  pr(e-stippositum  of 
the  Christian  scheme,  or  a  postulate  of  reason, 
indispensable,  if  we  would  render  the  existence 
of  a  world  of  finites  compatible  with  the  as- 
sumption of  a  super-mundane  God,  not  one 
with  the  world.  In  short,  this  idea  is  the  con- 
dition under  which  alone  the  reason  of  man 
can  retain  the  doctrine  of  an  infinite  and  abso- 
lute Being,  and  yet  keep  clear  of  pantheism 
as  exhibited  by  Benedict  Spinosa. 

II.  The  Egyptian  Magicians. 

This  whole  narrative  is  probably  a  relic  of 
the  old  diplomatic  lingua- arcana,  or  state-sym- 
bolique — in  which  the  prediction  of  events  is 
expressed  as  the  immediate  causing  of  them. 
Thus  the  prophet  is  said  to  destroy  the  city, 
the  destruction  of  which  he  predicts.  The 
word  which  our  version  renders  by  ''  enchant- 
ments" signifies  "  flames  or  burnings,"  by 
which  it  is  probable  that  the  Egyptians  were 
able  to  deceive  the  spectators,  and  substitute 
serpents  for  staves.     See  Parkhurst  in  voce. 

And  with  regard  to  the  possessions  in  the 
Gospels,  bear  in  mind  first  of  all,  that  spirits 
are  not  necessarily  souls  or  Is  {ich-heiten  or 
self- consciousnesses),  and  that  the  most  ludicrous 
absurdities  would  follow  from  takinix  them  as 


212  COURSK  OF   LECTURES. 

sucli  in  the  Gospel  instances  ;  and  secondly, 
that  the  Evangelist,  who  lias  recorded  the 
most  of  these  incidents,  himself  speaks  of  one 
of  these   possessed    persons   as    a   lunatic ; — 

((TfXj/vto^srHi — i^i]X^£v  air    avrov  to  ^at/uovtov.      Matt. 

xvii.  15. 18.)  while  St.  John  names  them  not  at 
all, but  seems  to  include  them  under  the  descrip- 
tion of  diseased  or  deranged  persons.  That 
madness  may  result  from  spiritual  causes,  and 
not  only  or  principally  from  physical  ailments, 
may  readily  be  admitted.  Is  not  our  will 
itself  a  spiritual  power?  Is  it  not  the  spirit  of 
the  man?  The  mind  of  a  rational  and  respon- 
sible being  (that  is,  of  a  free- agent)  is  a  spirit, 
though  it  does  not  follow  that  all  spirits  are 
minds.  Who  shall  dare  determine  what  spiri- 
tual influences  may  not  arise  out  of  the  col- 
lective evil  wills  of  wicked  men  ?  Even  the 
bestial  life,  sinless  in  animals  and  their  nature, 
may  when  awakened  in  the  man  and  by  his 
own  act  admitted  into  his  will,  become  a  spiri- 
tual influence.  He  receives  a  nature  into  his 
will,  which  by  this  very  act  becomes  a  corrupt 
w  ill ;  and  vice  versa,  this  will  becomes  his 
nature,  and  thus  a  corrupt  nature.  This  may 
be  conceded  ;  and  this  is  all  that  the  recorded 
words  of  our  Saviour  absolutely  require  in 
order  to  receive  an  appropriate  sense ;  but 
this  is  altogether  different  from  making  spirits 
to  be  devils,  and  devils  self-conscious  indi- 
viduals. 


LECTURE  Xll.  213 


Notes.*     March,  1824. 

A  Christian's  conflicts  and  conquests,  p.  459.  By  the 
devi!  we  are  to  understand  that  apostate  spirit  which  fell  from 
God,  and  is  always  designing  to  hale  down  others  from  God 
also.  The  Old  Dragon  (mentioned  in  the  Revelation)  with 
his  tail  drew  down  the  third  part  of  the  stars  of  heaven  and 
cast  them  to  the  earth. 

How  much  is  it  to  be  regretted,  that  so 
enlightened  and  able  a  divine  as  Smith,  had 
not  philosophically  and  scripturally  enucleated 
this  so  difficult  yet  important  question, — res- 
pecting the  personal  existence  of  the  evil  prin- 
ciple ;  that  is,  whether  as  to  Beiov  of  paganism 
is  o  deog  in  Christianity,  so  the  to  noviipov  is  to  be 
o  TTovrjpog, — and  whether  this  is  an  express 
doctrine  of  Christ,  and  not  merely  a  Jewish 
dogma  left  undisturbed  to  fade  away  under  the 
increasing  light  of  the  Gospel,  instead  of  as- 
suming the  former,  and  confirming  the  position 
by  a  verse  from  a  poetic  tissue  of  visual  sym- 
bols,— a  verse  alien  from  the  subject,  and  by 
which  the  Apocalypt  enigmatized  the  Neronian 
persecutions  and  the  apostacy  through  fear 
occasioned  by  it  in  a  large  number  of  converts. 

lb.  p.  463.  When  we  say,  the  devil  is  continually  busy 
with  us,  I  mean  not  only  some  apostate  spirit  as  one  parti- 
cular being,  but  that  spirit  of  apostacy  which  is  lodged  in  all 


*  Written  in  a  copy  of"  Select  Discourses  by  John  Smith, 
of  Queen's  College,  Cambridge,  1660,"  and  communicated 
by  the  Rev.  Edward  Coleridge,     Ed. 


214  COURSE  OF   LECTURES. 

men's  natures  ;  and  this  may  seem  particularly  to  be  aimed  at 
in  this  place,  if  we  observe  the  context: — as  the  scripture 
speaks  of  Christ  not  only  as  a  particular  person,  but  as  a 
divine  principle  in  holy  souls. 

Indeed  the  devil  is  not  only  the  name  of  one  particular  thing, 
but  a  nature. 


May  I  not  venture  to  suspect  that  this  was 
Smith's  own  belief  and  judgment?  and  that 
his  conversion  of  the  Satan,  that  is,  circuitor,  or 
minister  of  police  (what  our  Sterne  calls  the 
accusing  angel)  in  the  prologue  to  Job  into  the 
devil  was  a  mere  condescension  to  the  prevail- 
ing prejudice?  Here,  however,  he  speaks  Uke 
himself,  and  like  a  true  religious  philosopher, 
who  felt  that  the  personality  of  evil  spirits 
is  a  trifling  question,  compared  with  the  per- 
sonality of  the  evil  principle.  This  is  indeed 
most  momentous. 


NOTE  ON  A  PASSAGE  IN  THE  LIFE  OF  HENRY 
EARL  OF  MORLAND.       20th  JuUC,   1827. 

The  defect  of  this  and  all  similar  theories 
that  I  am  acquainted  with,  or  rather,  let  me 
say,  the  desideratum,  is  the  neglect  of  a  pre- 
vious definition  of  the  term  "  body."  What 
do  you  mean  by  it?  The  immediate  grounds 
of  a  man's  size,  visibility,  tangibility,  &C'? — But 
these  are  in  a  continual  flux  even  as  a  column 
of  smoke.  The  material  particles  of  carbon, 
nitrogen,  oxygen,  hydrogen,  lime,  phosphorus. 


LECTURE  XII.  215 

sulphur,  soda,  iron,  that  constitute  the  ponder- 
able organism  in  May,  1827,  at  the  moment  of 
Pollio's  death  in  his  70th  year,  have  no  better 
claim  to  be  called  his  "  body,"  than  the  nume- 
rical particles  of  the  same  names  that  consti- 
tuted the  ponderable  mass  in  May,  1787,  in 
Pollio's  prime  of  manhood  in  his  30th  year ; — 
the  latter  no  less  than  the  former  go  into  the 
grave,  that  is,  suffer  dissolution,  the  one  in  a 
series,  the  other  simultaneously.  The  result 
to  the  particles  is  precisely  the  same  in  both, 
and  of  both  therefore  we  must  say  with  holy 
Paul, — "  Thou  fool!  that  ivhich  thou  soivest, 
thou  soivest  not  that  hody  that  shall  be,'  &c. 
Neither  this  nor  that  is  the  body  that  abideth. 
Abideth,  I  say ;  for  that  which  riseth  again 
must  have  remained,  though  perhaps  in  an 
inert  state. — It  is  not  dead,  but  sleepeth ; — 
that  is,  it  is  not  dissolved  any  more  than  the 
exterior  or  phenomenal  organism  appears  to 
us  dissolved  when  it  lieth  in  apparent  inacti- 
vity during  our  sleep. 

Sound  reasoning  this,  to  the  best  of  my 
judgment,  as  far  as  it  goes.  But  how  are  we 
to  explain  the  reaction  of  this  fluxional  body  on 
the  animal?  In  each  moment  the  particles  by 
the  informing  force  of  the  living  principle  con- 
stitute an  organ  not  only  of  motion  and  sense, 
but  of  consciousness.  The  organ  plays  on 
the  organist.  How  is  this  conceivable  ?  The 
solution  requires  a  depth,  stillness,  and  sub- 
tlety of  spirit  not  only  for  its  discovery,  but 


21G  COURSE  OF  LF.CTUUES. 

even  for  the  understanding  of  it  when  disco- 
vered, and  in  the  most  appropriate  words 
enunciated.  I  can  merely  give  a  hint.  The 
particles  themselves  must  have  an  interior  and 
gravitative  being,  and  the  multeity  must  be  a 
removable  or  at  least  suspensible  accident. 


LECTURE  XIII. 

ON   POESY  OR  AR'l'. 

Man  communicates  by  articulation  of  sounds, 
and  paramountly  by  the  memory  in  the  ear ; 
nature  by  the  impression  of  bounds  and  sur- 
faces on  the  eye,  and  through  the  eye  it  gives 
significance  and  appropriation,  and  thus  the 
conditions  of  memory,  or  the  capability  of  be- 
ing remembered,  to  sounds,  smells,  &c.  Now 
Art,  used  collectively  for  painting,  sculpture, 
architecture  and  music,  is  the  mediatress  be- 
tween, and  reconciler  of,  nature  and  man.  It 
is,  therefore,  the  power  of  humanizing  nature, 
of  infusing  the  thoughts  and  passions  of  man 
into  every  thing  whicli  is  the  object  of  his 
contemplation  ;  colour,  form,  motion  and  sound 
are  the  elements  which  it  combines,  and  it 
stamps  them  into  unity  in  the  mould  of  a 
moral  idea. 

The  primary  art  is  writing ; — primary,  if  we 
regard  the  purpose  abstracted  from  the  diffe- 
rent modes  of  realizing  it,  those  steps  of  pro- 


LECTURE  XIII.  217 

gression  of  which  the  instances  are  still  visible 
in  the  lower  degrees  of  civilization.  First, 
there  is  mere  gesticulation  ;  then  rosaries  or 
wampim ;  then  picture-language  ;  then  hie- 
roglyphics, and  finally  alphabetic  letters. 
These  all  consist  of  a  translation  of  man  into 
nature,  of  a  substitution  of  the  visible  for  the 
audible. 

The  so  called  music  of  savage  tribes  as  little 
deserves  the  name  of  art  for  the  understanding 
as  the  ear  warrants  it  for  music.     Its  lowest 
state  is  a  mere  expression  of  passion  by  sounds 
which    the    passion   itself    necessitates;— the 
highest  amounts  to  no  more  than  a  voluntary 
reproduction  of  these  sounds  in  the  absence  of 
the  occasioning  causes,  so  as  to  give  the  plea- 
sure of  contrast, — for  example,  by  the  various 
outcries  of  battle  in  the  song  of  security  and 
triumph.     Poetry  also  is  purely  human  ;    for 
all  its  materials  are  from  the  mind,  and  all  its 
products  are  for  the  mind.     But  it  is  the  apo- 
theosis of  the  former  state,  in  which  by  excite- 
ment of  the  associative  power  passion  itself 
imitates  order,   and  the  order  resulting  pro- 
duces a  pleasurable  passion,  and  thus  it  elevates 
the  mind  by  making  its  feelings  the  object  of 
its  reflexion.     So  likewise,  whilst  it  recalls  the 
sights  and  sounds  that  had  accompanied  the 
occasions  of  the  original  passions,  poetry  im- 
pregnates them  with  an  interest  not  their  own 
by  means  of  the  passions,  and  yet  tempers  the 
passion  by  the  calming  power  which  all  dis- 


'218  COURSE  OF  LECTUUES. 

tinct  images  exert  on  the  human  soul.  In  this 
way  poetry  is  the  preparation  for  art,  inasmuch 
as  it  avails  itself  of  the  forms  of  nature  to  re- 
call, to  express,  and  to  modify  the  thoughts 
and  feelings  of  the  mind.  Still,  however, 
poetry  can  only  act  through  the  intervention 
of  articulate  speech,  which  is  so  peculiarly 
human,  that  in  all  languages  it  constitutes  the 
ordinary  phrase  by  which  man  and  nature  are 
contradistinguished.  It  is  the  original  force 
of  the  word  '  brute,'  and  even  '  mute,'  and 
'  dumb'  do  not  convey  the  absence  of  sound, 
but  the  absence  of  articulated  sounds. 

As  soon  as  the  human  mind  is  intelligibly 
addressed  by  an  outward  image  exclusively  of 
articulate  speech,  so  soon  does  art  commence. 
But  please  to  observe  that  I  have  laid  parti- 
cular stress  on  the  words '  human  mind,' — mean- 
ing to  exclude  thereby  all  results  common  to 
man  and  all  other  sentient  creatures,  and  con- 
sequently confining  myself  to  the  effect  pro- 
duced by  the  congruity  of  the  animal  impres- 
sion with  the  reflective  powers  of  the  mind ; 
so  that  not  the  thing  presented,  but  that  which 
is  re-presented  by  the  thing  shall  be  the  source 
of  the  pleasure.  In  this  sense  nature  itself  is 
to  a  religious  observer  the  art  of  God  ;  and  for 
the  same  cause  art  itself  might  be  defined  as 
of  a  middle  quality  between  a  thought  and  a 
thing,  or  as  I  said  before,  the  union  and  recon- 
ciliation of  that  which  is  nature  with  that 
which  is  exclusively  human.     It  is  the  figured 


LECTUUE  XIII.  2  1  9 

language  of  thought,  and  is  distinguished  from 
nature  by  the  unity  of  all  the  parts  in  one 
thought  or  idea.  Hence  nature  itself  would 
give  us  the  impression  of  a  work  of  art  if  we 
could  see  the  thought  which  is  present  at  once 
in  the  whole  and  in  every  part ;  and  a  work  of 
art  will  be  just  in  proportion  as  it  adequately 
conveys  the  thought,  and  rich  in  proportion 
to  the  variety  of  parts  which  it  holds  in  unity. 

If,  therefore,  the  term  '  mute'  be  taken  as 
opposed  not  to  sound  but  to  articulate  speech, 
the  old  definition  of  painting  will  in  fact  be 
the  true  and  best  definition  of  the  Fine  Arts  in 
general,  that  is,  muta  poesis,  mute  poesy,  and  so 
of  course  poesy.  And,  as  all  languages  perfect 
themselves  by  a  gradual  process  of  desyn- 
onymizing  words  originally  equivalent,  I  have 
cherished  the  wish  to  use  the  word  '  poesy'  as 
the  generic  or  common  term,  and  to  distinguish 
that  species  of  poesy  which  is  not  7nuta  poesis 
by  its  usual  name  '  poetry ;'  while  of  all  the 
other  species  which  collectively  form  the  Fine 
Arts,  there  would  remain  this  as  the  common 
definition,— that  they  all,  like  poetry,  are  to 
express  intellectual  purposes,  thoughts,  con- 
ceptions, and  sentiments  which  have  their 
origin  in  the  human  mind, — not,  however,  as 
poetry  does,  by  means  of  articulate  speech, 
but  as  nature  or  the  divine  art  does,  by  form, 
colour,  magnitude,  proportion,  or  by  sound,  that 
is,  silently  or  musically. 

Well !    it  may  be  said — but  who  has  ever 


220  couKsE  or  lectures. 

thought  otherwise?  We  all  know  that  art  is 
the  iniitatress  of  nature.  And,  doubtless,  the 
truths  which  I  hope  to  convey  would  be  barren 
truisms,  if  all  men  meant  the  same  by  the 
words  '  imitate'  and  '  nature.'  But  it  would 
be  flattering  mankind  at  large,  to  presume 
that  such  is  the  fact.  First,  to  imitate.  The 
impression  on  the  wax  is  not  an  imitation,  but 
a  copy,  of  the  seal ;  the  seal  itself  is  an  imi- 
tation. But,  further,  in  order  to  form  a  philo- 
sophic conception,  we  must  seek  for  the  kind, 
as  the  heat  in  ice,  invisible  light,  &c.  whilst, 
for  practical  purposes,  we  must  have  reference 
to  the  degree.  It  is  sufficient  that  philoso- 
phically we  understand  that  in  all  imitation 
two  elements  must  coexist,  and  not  only  co- 
exist, but  must  be  perceived  as  coexisting. 
These  two  constituent  elements  are  likeness 
and  unlikeness,  or  sameness  and  difference, 
and  in  all  genuine  creations  of  art  there  must 
be  a  union  of  these  disparates.  The  artist 
may  take  his  point  of  view  where  he  pleases, 
provided  that  the  desired  effect  be  perceptibly 
produced, — that  there  be  likeness  in  the  diffe- 
rence, difference  in  the  likeness,  and  a  recon- 
cilement of  both  in  one.  If  there  be  likeness 
to  nature  without  any  check  of  difference,  the 
result  is  disgusting,  and  the  more  complete  the 
delusion,  the  more  loathsome  the  effect.  Why 
are  such  simulations  of  nature,  as  wax-work 
figures  of  men  and  women,  so  disagreeable? 
Because,  not  finding  the  motion  and  the  life 


LECTURE  XIII.  221 

which  we  expected,  we  are  shocked  as  by  a 
falsehood,  every  circumstance  of  detail,  which 
before  induced  us  to  be  interested,  making  the 
distance  from  truth  more  palpable^  You  set 
out  with  a  supposed  reality  and  are  disap- 
pointed and  disgusted  with  the  deception ; 
whilst,  in  respect  to  a  work  of  genuine  imita- 
tion, you  begin  with  an  acknowledged  total 
difference,  and  then  every  touch  of  nature 
gives  you  the  pleasure  of  an  approximation  to 
truth.  The  fundamental  principle  of  all  this 
is  undoubtedly  the  horror  of  falsehood  and  the 

a/ 

love  of  truth  inherent  in  the  human  breast. 
The  Greek  tragic  dance  rested  on  these  prin- 
ciples, and  I  can  deeply  symi3athize  in  imagi- 
nation with  the  Greeks  in  this  favourite  part 
of  their  theatrical  exhibitions,  when  I  call  to 
mind  the  pleasure  1  felt  in  beholding  the  combat 
of  the  Horatii  and  Curiatii  most  exquisitely 
danced  in  Italy  to  the  music  of  Cimarosa. 

Secondly,  as  to  nature.  We  must  imitate 
nature  !  yes,  but  what  in  nature, — all  and  every 
thing  ?  No,  the  beautiful  in  nature.  And 
what  then  is  the  beautiful  ?  What  is  beauty  ? 
It  is,  in  the  abstract,  the  unity  of  the  manifold, 
the  coalescence  of  the  diverse  ;  in  the  concrete, 
it  is  the  union  of  the  shapely  (formosum)  with 
the  vital.  In  the  dead  organic  it  depends  on 
regularity  of  form,  the  first  and  lowest  species 
of  which  is  the  triangle  with  all  its  modifica- 
tions, as  in  crystals,  architecture,  &c. ;  in  the 
living  organic  it  is  not  mere  regularity  of  form, 


222  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

which  would  jnoduce  a  sense  of  formality  ;  nei- 
ther is  it  subservient  to  any  thing  beside  itself. 
It  may  be  present  in  a  disagreeable  object,  in 
which  the  proportion  of  the  parts  constitutes  a 
whole ;  it  docs  not  arise  from  association,  as 
the  agreeable  does,  but  sometimes  lies  in  the 
rupture  of  association  ;  it  is  not  different  to 
different  individuals  and  nations,  as  has  been 
said,  nor  is  it  connected  with  the  ideas  of  the 
good,  or  the  fit,  or  the  useful.  The  sense  of 
beauty  is  intuitive,  and  beauty  itself  is  all  that 
inspires  pleasure  without,  and  aloof  from,  and 
even  contrarily  to,  interest. 

If  the  artist  copies  the  mere  nature,  the 
natura  natiirata,  what  idle  rivalry  ?  If  he  pro- 
ceeds only  from  a  given  form,  which  is  sup- 
posed to  answer  to  the  notion  of  beauty,  what 
an  emptiness,  what  an  unreality  there  always 
is  in  his  productions,  as  in  Cipriani's  pictures  ! 
Believe  me,  you  must  master  the  essence,  the 
natura  natiwans,  which  presupposes  a  bond 
between  nature  in  the  higher  sense  and  the 
soul  of  man. 

The  wisdom  in  nature  is  distinguished  from 
that  in  man  by  the  co-instantaneity  of  the 
plan  and  the  execution ;  the  thought  and  the 
product  are  one,  or  are  given  at  once ;  but 
there  is  no  reflex  act,  and  hence  there  is  no 
moral  responsibility.  In  man  there  is  reflexion, 
freedom,  and  choice  ;  he  is,  therefore,  the  head 
of  the  visible  creation.  In  the  objects  of  na- 
ture are  presented,  as  in  a  mirror,  all  the  pos- 


LECTURE  XIII.  223 

sible  elements,  steps,  and  processes  of  intellect 
antecedent  to  consciousness,  and  therefore  to 
the  full  development  of  the  intelligential  act ; 
and  man's  mind  is  the  very  focus  of  all  the 
rays  of  intellect  which  are  scattered  through- 
out the  images  of  nature.  Now  so  to  place 
these  images,  totalized,  and  fitted  to  the  limits 
of  the  human  mind,  as  to  elicit  from,  and  to 
superinduce  upon,  the  forms  themselves  the 
moral  reflexions  to  which  they  approximate, 
to  make  the  external  internal,  the  internal 
external,  to  make  nature  thought,  and  thought 
nature, — this  is  the  mystery  of  genius  in  the 
Fine  Arts.  Dare  I  add  that  the  genius  must 
act  on  the  feeling,  that  body  is  but  a  striving 
to  become  mind, — that  it  is  mind  in  its  es- 
sence ! 

In  every  work  of  art  there  is  a  reconcile- 
ment of  the  external  with  the  internal ;  the 
conscious  is  so  impressed  on  the  vmconscious 
as  to  appear  in  it ;  as  compare  mere  letters  in- 
scribed on  a  tomb  with  figures  themselves  con- 
stituting the  tomb.  He  who  combines  the  two 
is  the  man  of  genius  ;  and  for  that  reason  he 
must  partake  of  both.  Hence  there  is  in 
genius  itself  an  unconscious  activity ;  nay, 
that  is  the  genius  in  the  man  of  genius.  And 
this  is  the  true  exposition  of  the  rule  that  the 
artist  must  first  eloign  himself  from  nature  in 
order  to  return  to  her  with  full  effect.  Why 
this?  Because  if  he  were  to  begin  by  mere 
painful  copying,  he  woidd  produce  masks  only, 


224  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

not  forms  breathing  life.  He  must  out  of  his 
own  mind  create  forms  according  to  the  severe 
h^^A  s  of  the  intellect,  in  order  to  generate  in 
himself  that  co-ordination  of  freedom  and  law, 
that  involution  of  obedience  in  the  prescript, 
and  of  the  prescript  in  the  impulse  to  obey, 
which  assimilates  him  to  nature,  and  enables 
him  to  luiderstand  her.  He  merely  absents 
himself  for  a  season  from  her,  that  his  own 
Sjjirit,  which  has  the  same  ground  w  ith  nature, 
may  learn  her  unspoken  language  in  its  main 
radicals,  before  he  approaches  to  her  endless 
compositions  of  them.  Yes,  not  to  acquire 
cold  notions — lifeless  technical  rules — but  living 
and  life-producing  ideas,  which  shall  contain 
their  own  evidence,  the  certainty  that  they 
are  essentially  one  with  the  germinal  causes 
in  nature — his  consciousness  being  the  focus 
and  miiTor  of  both, — for  this  does  the  artist  for 
a  time  abandon  the  external  real  m  order  to 
return  to  it  with  a  complete  sympathy  with  its 
internal  and  actual.  For  of  all  we  see,  hear, 
feel  and  touch  the  substance  is  and  must  be  in 
ourselves ;  and  therefore  there  is  no  alternative 
in  reason  between  the  dreary  (and  thank  hea- 
ven !  almost  impossible)  belief  that  every  thing 
around  us  is  but  a  phantom,  or  that  the  life 
which  is  in  us  is  in  them  likewise  ;  and  that  to 
know  is  to  resemble,  when  v.e  speak  of  objects 
out  of  ourselves,  even  as  within  ourselves  to 
learn  is,  according  to  Plato,  only  to  recollect; — 
the  only  effective  answer  to  which,  that  I  have 


LECTURE  XIII.  225 

been  fortunate  to  meet  with,  is  that  which 
Pope  has  consecrated  for  future  use  in  theline — 

And  coxcombs  vanquish  Berkeley  with  a  grin ! 

The  artist  must  imitate  that  which  is  within 
the  thing,  that  which  is  active  through  form 
and  figure,  and  discourses  to  us  by  symbols — 
the  Natur-geist,  or  spirit  of  nature,  as  we  uncon- 
sciously imitate  those  whom  we  love ;  for  so 
only  can  he  hope  to  produce  any  work  truly 
natural  in  the  object  and  truly  human  in  the 
effect.  The  idea  which  puts  the  form  together 
cannot  itself  be  the  form.  It  is  above  form, 
and  is  its  essence,  the  universal  in  the  indivi- 
dual, or  the  individuality  itself, — the  glance  and 
the  exponent  of  the  indwelling  power. 

Each  thing  that  lives  has  its  moment  of 
self-exposition,  and  so  has  each  period  of  each 
thing,  if  we  remove  the  disturbing  forces  of 
accident.  To  do  this  is  the  business  of  ideal 
art,  whether  in  images  of  childhood,  youth,  or 
age,  in  man  or  in  woman.  Hence  a  good 
portrait  is  the  abstract  of  the  personal ;  it  is 
not  the  likeness  for  actual  comparison,  but  for 
recollection.  This  explains  why  the  likeness 
of  a  very  good  portrait  is  not  always  recog- 
nized ;  because  some  persons  never  abstract, 
and  amongst  these  aie  especially  to  be  num- 
bered the  near  relations  and  friends  of  the 
subject,  in  consequence  of  the  constant  pres- 
sure and  check  exercised  on  their  minds  by 
the  actual  presence  of  the  original.     And  each 

VOL.  I.  Q 


226  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

thing  that  only  appears  to  live  has  also  its  pos- 
sible position  of  relation  to  life,  as  natnre  her- 
self testifies,  who,  where  she  cannot  be,  pro- 
phecies her  being  in  the  crystallized  metal, 
or  the  inhaling  plant. 

The  charm,  the  indispensable  requisite,  of 
sculpture  is  unity  of  effect.  But  painting- 
rests  in  a  material  remoter  from  nature,  and 
its  compass  is  therefore  greater.  Light  and 
shade  give  external,  as  well  internal,  being 
even  with  all  its  accidents,  whilst  sculpture  is 
confined  to  the  latter.  And  here  I  may  ob- 
serve that  the  subjects  chosen  for  works  of  art, 
whether  in  sculpture  or  painting,  should  be 
such  as  really  are  capable  of  being  expressed 
and  conveyed  within  the  limits  of  those  arts. 
Moreover  they  ought  to  be  such  as  will  affect 
the  spectator  by  their  truth,  their  beauty,  or 
their  sublimity,  and  therefore  they  may  be 
addressed  to  the  judgment,  the  senses,  or  the 
reason.  The  peculiarity  of  the  impression 
which  they  may  make,  may  be  derived  either 
from  colour  and  form,  or  from  proportion  and 
fitness,  or  from  the  excitement  of  the  moral 
feelings ;  or  all  these  may  be  combined.  Such 
works  as  do  combine  these  sources  of  effect 
must  have  the  preference  in  dignity. 

Imitation  of  the  antique  may  be  too  exclu- 
sive, and  may  produce  an  injurious  effect  on 
modern  sculpture;  —  1st,  generally,  because 
such  an  imitation  cannot  fail  to  have  a  ten- 
dency to  keep  the  attention  fixed  on  externals 


LECTURE  XIII.  227 

rather  than  on  the  thought  within ; — 2ndly, 
because,  accordingly,  it  leads  the  artist  to  rest 
satisfied  with  that  which  is  always  imperfect, 
namely,  bodily  form,  and  circumscribes  his 
views  of  mental  expression  to  the  ideas  of 
power  and  grandeur  only ; — 3rdly,  because  it 
induces  an  effort  to  combine  together  two  in- 
congruous things,  that  is  to  say,  modern  feel- 
ings in  antique  forms; — 4thly,  because  it 
speaks  in  a  language,  as  it  were,  learned  and 
dead,  the  tones  of  which,  being  unfamiliar, 
leave  the  common  spectator  cold  and  unim- 
pressed ; — and  lastly,  because  it  necessarily 
causes  a  neglect  of  thoughts,  emotions  and 
images  of  profounder  interest  and  more  exalted 
dignity,  as  motherly,  sisterly,  and  brotherly 
love,  piety,  devotion,  the  divine  become  hu- 
man,— the  Virgin,  the  Apostle,  the  Christ. 
The  artist's  principle  in  the  statue  of  a  great 
man  should  be  the  illustration  of  departed 
merit;  and  I  cannot  but  think  that  a  skilful 
adoption  of  modern  habiliments  would,  in 
many  instances,  give  a  variety  and  force  of 
effect  which  a  bigotted  adherence  to  Greek  or 
Roman  costume  precludes.  It  is,  I  believe, 
from  artists  finding  Greek  models  unfit  for 
several  important  modern  purposes,  that  we 
see  so  many  allegorical  figures  on  monuments 
and  elsewhere.  Painting  was,  as  it  were,  a 
new  art,  and  being  unshackled  by  old  models 
it  chose  its  own  subjects,  and  took  an  eagle's 
flight.    And  a  new  field  seems  opened  for  mo- 


228  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

(lern  sculpture  in  the  syuibolical  expression  of 
the  ends  of  life,  as  in  Guy's  monument,  Chant- 
rey's  children  in  Worcester  Cathedral,  &c. 

Architecture  exhibits  the  greatest  extent  of 
the  difierence  from  nature  which  may  exist  in 
works  of  art.  It  involves  all  the  powers  of 
design,  and  is  sculpture  and  painting  inclu- 
sively. It  shews  the  greatness  of  man,  and 
should  at  the  same  time  teach  him  humility. 

Music  is  the  most  entirely  human  of  the 
tine  arts,  and  has  the  fewest  analoga  in  nature. 
Its  first  delightfulness  is  simple  accordance 
with  the  ear  ;  but  it  is  an  associated  thing,  and 
recalls  the  deep  emotions  of  the  past  with  an 
intellectual  sense  of  proportion.  Every  human 
feeling  is  greater  and  larger  than  the  exciting 
cause, — a  proof,  I  think,  that  man  is  designed 
for  a  higher  state  of  existence ;  and  this  is 
deeply  implied  in  music  in  which  there  is 
always  something  more  and  beyond  the  im- 
mediate expression. 

With  regard  to  works  in  all  the  branches 
of  the  fine  arts,  I  may  remark  that  the  plea- 
sure arising  from  novelty  must  of  course  be 
allowed  its  due  place  and  weight.  This  plea- 
sure consists  in  the  identity  of  two  opposite 
elements,  that  is  to  say — sameness  and  variety. 
If  in  the  midst  of  the  variety  there  be  not 
some  fixed  object  for  the  attention,  the  un- 
ceasing succession  of  the  variety  will  prevent 
the  mind  from  observing  the  difference  of  the 


LECTUUi-:  xiii.  229 

individual  objects;  and  the  only  thing  re- 
mainins:  will  be  the  succession,  which  will 
then  produce  precisely  the  same  effect  as 
sameness.  This  we  experience  when  we  let 
the  trees  or  hedges  pass  before  the  fixed  eye 
during  a  rapid  movement  in  a  carriage,  or  on 
the  other  hand,  when  we  suffer  a  file  of  soldiers 
or  ranks  of  men  in  procession  to  go  on  before 
us  without  resting  the  eye  on  any  one  in  par- 
ticular. In  order  to  derive  pleasure  from  the 
occupation  of  the  mind,  the  principle  of  unity 
must  always  be  present,  so  that  in  the  midst 
of  the  multeity  the  centripetal  force  be  never 
suspended,  nor  the  sense  be  fatigued  by  the 
predominance  of  the  centrifugal  force.  This 
unity  in  multeity  I  have  elsewhere  stated  as 
the  principle  of  beauty.  It  is  equally  the  source 
of  pleasure  in  variety,  and  in  fact  a  higher  term 
including  both.  What  is  the  seclusive  or  dis- 
tinguishing term  between  them  ? 

Remember  that  there  is  a  difference  between 
form  as  proceeding,  and  shape  as  superin- 
duced ; — the  latter  is  either  the  death  or  the 
imprisonment  of  the  thing; — the  former  is  its 
self-witnessing  and  self-effected  sphere  of 
agency.  Art  would  or  should  be  the  abridg- 
ment of  nature.  Now  the  fulness  of  nature  is 
without  character,  as  water  is  purest  when 
without  taste,  smell,  or  colour;  but  this  is  the 
highest,  the  apex  only, — it  is  not  the  whole. 
The    object  of  art   is    to  give  the  whole  ad 


230  COURSE  Ol'  LE('TUUi:S. 

Iiominem ;  hence  each  step  of  nature  hath  its 
ideal,  and  hence  the  possibility  of  a  climax  up 
to  the  perfect  form  of  a  harmonized  chaos. 

To  the  idea  of  life  victory  or  strife  is  neces- 
sary ;  as  virtue  consists  not  simply  in  the  ab- 
sence of  vices,  but  in  the  overcoming  of  them. 
So  it  is  in  beauty.  The  sight  of  what  is  subor- 
dinated and  conquered  heightens  the  strength 
and  the  pleasure  ;  and  this  should  be  exhibited 
by  the  artist  either  inclusively  in  his  figure,  or 
else  out  of  it  and  beside  it  to  act  by  way  of 
supplement  and  contrast.  And  with  a  view 
to  this,  remark  the  seeming  identity  of  body 
and  mind  in  infants,  and  thence  the  loveliness 
of  the  former ;  the  commencing  separation  in 
boyhood,  and  the  struggle  of  equilibrium  in 
youth  :  thence  onward  the  body  is  first  simply 
indifferent ;  then  demanding  the  translucency 
of  the  mind  not  to  be  worse  than  indifferent ; 
and  finally  all  that  presents  the  body  as  body 
becoming  almost  of  an  excremental  nature. 


LECTURE  XIV. 


ON  STYLE. 


I  HAVE,  I  believe,  formerly  observed  with  re- 
gard to  the  character  of  the  governments  of 
the  East,  that  their  tendency  was  despotic, 
that  is,  towards  unity  ;  whilst  that  of  the  Greek 


LECTURE  XIV.  231 

governments,  on  the  other  hand,  leaned  to  the 
manifold  and  the  popular,  the  unity  in  them 
being  purely  ideal,  namely  of  all  as  an  identi- 
fication of  the  whole.     In  the  northern  or  Go- 
thic nations  the  aim  and  purpose  of  the  go- 
vernment were  the  preservation  of  the  rights 
and  interests  of  the  individual  in  conjunction 
with  those  of  the  whole.     The  individual  in- 
terest was  sacred.     In  the  character  and  ten- 
dency  of  the  Greek  and   Gothic  languages 
there  is  precisely  the  same  relative  difference. 
In  Greek  the  sentences  are  long,  and  the  struc- 
ture architectural,  so  that  each  part  or  clause 
is  insignificant  when  compared  with  the  whole. 
The  result  is  every  thing,  the  steps  and  pro- 
cesses nothing.     But  in  the  Gothic  and,  gene- 
rally, in  what  we  call  the  modern,  languages, 
the  structure  is  short,  simple,  and  complete  in 
each  part,  and  the  connexion  of  the  parts  with 
the  sum  total  of  the  discourse  is  maintained  by 
the  sequency  of  the  logic,  or  the  community  of 
feelings  excited  between  the  writer  and  his 
readers.      As  an  instance  equally  delightful 
and  complete,  of  what  may  be  called  the  Go- 
thic structure  as  contra-distinguished  from  that 
of  the  Greeks,  let  me  cite  a  part  of  our  famous 
Chaucer's  character  of  a  parish  priest  as  he 
should  be.     Can  it  ever  be  quoted  too  often  ? 

A  good  man  ther  was  of  religioun 
That  was  a  poure  Parsone  of  a  toun, 
But  riche  he  was  of  holy  thought  and  werk  ; 
He  was  also  a  Icrned  man,  a  clerk, 


232  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

That  Cristes  gospel  trewely  wolde  preche  ; 
His  parishensi  devoutly  wolde  he  teche  ; 
Benigne  he  was,  and  wonder^  diligent, 
And  in  adversite  ful  patient, 
And  swiche''  he  was  ypreved"*  often  sithes*; 
Ful  loth  were  him  to  cursen  for  his  tithes, 
But  rather  wolde  he  yeven^  out  of  doute 
Unto  his  poure  parishens  aboute 
Of  his  offring,  and  eke  of  his  substance  ; 
He  coude  in  litel  thing  have  suffisance : 
Wide  was  his  parish,  and  houses  fer  asonder. 
But  he  ne^  left  nought  for  no  rain  ne«  thonder, 
In  sikenesse  and  in  mischief  to  visite 
The  ferrest9  in  his  parish  moche  and  lite*" 
Upon  his  fete,  and  in  his  hand  a  staf : 
This  noble  ensample  to  his  shepe  he  yaf,*' 
That  first  he  wrought,  and  afterward  he  taught. 
Out  of  the  gospel  he  the  wordes  caught, 
And  this  figure  he  added  yet  thereto, 
That  if  gold  ruste,  what  should  iren  do. 

He  sette  not  his  benefice  to  hire, 
And  lette'2  his  shepe  accombred  i"*  in  the  mire. 
And  ran  unto  London  unto  Seint  Poules, 
To  seken  him  a  chanterie  for  soules. 
Or  with  a  brotherhede  to  be  withold, 
But  dwelt  at  home,  and  kepte  wel  his  fold. 
So  that  the  wolf  ne  made  it  not  miscarie : 
He  was  a  shepherd  and  no  mercenarie; 
And  though  he  holy  were  and  vertuous, 
He  was  to  sinful  men  not  dispitous,!^ 
Ne  of  his  speche  dangerous  ne  digne,i5 
But  in  his  teching  discrete  and  benigne, 
To  drawen  folk  to  heven  with  fairenesse, 
By  good  ensample  was  his  besinesse; 


A  Parishioners.         ~  Wondrous.  ■''  Such. 

4  Proved.  ^  Times.  ^  Give  or  have  given. 

7  Not.  ^  Nor.  9  Farthest. 

10  Great  and  small,  i*  Gave.  ^~  Left. 

13  Encumbered.      '*  Despiteous.  '^  Proud. 


LECTURE  XIV.  233 

But  it  were  any  persona  obstinat, 
What  so  he  were  of  high  or  low  estat, 
Him  wolde  he  snibben^^  sharply  for  the  nones: 
A  better  preest  I  trowe  that  no  wher  non  is ; 
He  waited  after  no  ponipe  ne  reverence, 
He  maked  him  no  spiced  conscience, 
But  Cristes  love  and  his  apostles'  twelve 
He  taught,  but  first  he  folwed  it  himselve.* 

Such  change  as  really  took  place  in  the 
style  of  our  literature  after  Chaucer's  time  is 
with  difficulty  perceptible,  on  account  of  the 
dearth  of  writers,  during  the  civil  wars  of  the 
15th  century.  But  the  transition  was  not  very 
great ;  and  accordingly  we  find  in  Latimer 
and  our  other  venerable  autliors  about  the  time 
of  Edward  VI.  as  in  Luther,  the  general  cha- 
racteristics of  the  earliest  manner; — that  is, 
every  part  popular,  and  the  discourse  addressed 
to  all  degrees  of  intellect ; — the  sentences  short, 
the  tone  vehement,  and  the  connexion  of  the 
whole  produced  by  honesty  and  singleness  of 
purpose,  intensity  of  passion,  and  pervading 
importance  of  the  subject. 

Another  and  a  very  different  species  of  style 
is  that  which  was  derived  from,  and  founded 
on,  the  admiration  and  cultivation  of  the  clas- 
sical writers,  and  which  was  more  exclusively 
addressed  to  the  learned  class  in  society.  I 
have  previously  mentioned  Boccaccio  as  the 
original  Italian  introducer  of  this  manner,  and 
the  great  models  of  it  in  English  are  Hooker, 
Bacon,  Milton,  and  Taylor,  although  it  maybe 

1'?  Reprove.  *  Prologue  to  Canterbury  Tales. 


234  ( OURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

traced  in  many  other  authors  of  that  age.  In 
all  these  the  language  is  dignified  but  plain, 
genuine  English,  although  elevated  and  bright- 
ened by  superiority  of  intellect  in  the  writer. 
Individual  words  themselves  are  always  used 
by  them  in  their  precise  meaning,  without  either 
affectation  or  slipslop.  The  letters  and  state 
papers  of  Sir  Francis  Walsingham  are  re- 
markable for  excellence  in  style  of  this  de- 
scription. In  Jeremy  Taylor  the  sentences  are 
often  extremely  long,  and  yet  are  generally 
so  perspicuous  in  consequence  of  their  logical 
structure,  that  they  require  no  reperusal  to  be 
understood  ;  and  it  is  for  the  most  part  the 
same  in  Milton  and  Hooker. 

Take  the  following  sentence  as  a  specimen 
of  the  sort  of  style  to  which  I  have  been  al- 
luding : — 

Concerning  Faith,  the  principal  object  whereof  is  that  eter- 
nal verity  which  hath  discovered  the  treasures  of  hidden  wis- 
dom in  Christ ;  concerning  Hope,  the  highest  object  whereof 
is  that  everlasting  goodness  which  in  Christ  doth  quicken  the 
dead  ;  concerning  Charity,  the  final  object  whereof  is  that  in- 
comprehensible beauty  which  shineth  in  the  countenance  of 
Christ,  the  Son  of  the  living  God :  concerning  these  virtues, 
the  first  of  which  beginning  here  with  a  weak  apprehension 
of  things  not  seen,  endeth  with  the  intuitive  vision  of  God  in 
the  world  to  come  ;  the  second  beginning  here  with  a  tremb- 
ling expectation  of  things  far  removed,  and  as  yet  but  only 
heard  of,  endeth  with  real  and  actual  fruition  of  that  which  no 
tongue  can  express ;  the  third  beginning  here  with  a  weak  in- 
clination of  heart  towards  him  unto  whom  we  are  not  able  to 
approach,  endeth  with  endless  union,  the  mystery  whereof  is 
higher  than  the  reach  of  the  thoughts  of  men  ;  concerning 
that  Fiiith,  Hope,  and  Charity,  without  which  there  can  be  no 


LECTURE  XIV.  235 

salvation,  was  there  ever  any  mention  made  saving  only  in 
that  Law  which  God  himself  hath  from  Heaven  revealed? 
There  is  not  in  the  world  a  syllable  muttered  with  certain  truth 
concerning  any  of  these  three,  more  than  hath  been  superna- 
turally  received  from  the  mouth  of  the  eternal  God, 

Eccles.  Pol.  I.  s.  11. 

The  unity  in  these  writers  is  produced  by 
the  unity  of  the  subject,  and  the  perpetual 
growth  and  evolution  of  the  thoughts,  one  ge- 
nerating, and  explaining,  and  justifying,  the 
place  of  another,  not,  as  it  is  in  Seneca,  where 
the  thoughts,  striking  as  they  are,  are  merely 
strung  together  like  beads,  without  any  causa- 
tion or  progression.  The  words  are  selected 
because  they  are  the  most  appropriate  regard 
being  had  to  the  dignity  of  the  total  impres- 
sion, and  no  merely  big  phrases  are  used  where 
plain  ones  would  have  sufficed,  even  in  the 
most  learned  of  their  works. 

There  is  some  truth  in  a  remark,  which  I 
believe  was  made  by  Sir  Joshua  Reynolds, 
that  the  greatest  man  is  he  who  forms  the  taste 
of  a  nation,  and  that  the  next  greatest  is  he 
who  corrupts  it.  The  true  classical  style  of 
Hooker  and  his  fellows  was  easily  open  to 
corruption ;  and  Sir  Thomas  Brown  it  was, 
who,  though  a  writer  of  great  genius,  first  ef- 
fectually injured  the  literary  taste  of  the  nation 
by  his  introduction  of  learned  words,  merely 
because  they  were  learned.  It  would  be  diffi- 
cult to  describe  Brown  adequately  ;  exuberant 
in  conception  and  conceit,  dignified,  hyper- 
latinistic,  a  quiet  and  sublime  enthusiast;  yet  a 


236  COURSE  OF  LECTURKS. 

fantast,  a  humourist,  a  brain  with  a  twist;  ego- 
tistic Hke  Montaigne,  yet  with  a  feeling  heart 
and  an  active  curiosity,  which,  however,  too 
often  degenerates  into  a  hunting  after  oddities. 
In  Iiis  Hydriotaphia  and,  indeed,  ahnost  all  his 
works  the  entireness  of  his  mental  action  is  very 
observable  ;  he  metamorphoses  every  thing,  be 
it  what  it  may,  into  the  subject  under  conside- 
ration. But  Sir  Thomas  Brown  with  all  his 
faults  had  a  genuine  idiom  ;  and  it  is  the  exis- 
tence of  an  individual  idiom  in  each,  that 
makes  the  principal  writers  before  the  Resto- 
ration the  great  patterns  or  integers  of  En- 
glish style.  In  them  the  precise  intended 
meaning  of  a  word  can  never  be  mistaken ; 
whereas  in  the  later  writers,  as  especially  in 
Pope,  the  use  of  words  is  for  the  most  part 
purely  arbitrary,  so  that  the  context  will  rarely 
show  the  true  specific  sense,  but  only  that  some- 
thing of  the  sort  is  designed.  A  perusal  of  the 
authorities  cited  by  Johnson  in  his  dictionary 
under  any  leading  word,  w^ill  give  you  a  lively 
sense  of  this  declension  in  etymological  truth 
of  expression  in  the  writers  after  the  Restora- 
tion, or  perhaps,  strictly,  after  the  middle  of 
the  reign  of  Charles  II. 

The  general  characteristic  of  the  style  of  our 
literature  down  to  the  period  which  I  have  just 
mentioned,  was  gravity,  and  in  Milton  and 
some  other  writers  of  his  day  there  are  percep- 
tible traces  of  the  sternness  of  republicanism. 
Soon  after  the  Restoration  a  material  change 


LECTURE  XIV.  237 

took  place,  and  the  cause  of  royalism  was 
graced,  sometimes  disgraced,  by  every  shade  of 
lightness  of  manner.  A  free  and  easy  style 
was  considered  as  a  test  of  loyalty,  or  at  all 
events,  as  a  badge  of  the  cavalier  party  ;  you 
may  detect  it  occasionally  even  in  Barrow, 
who  is,  however,  in  general  remarkable  for 
dignity  and  logical  sequency  of  expression  ; 
but  in  L'Estrange,  Collyer,  and  the  writers  of 
that  class,  this  easy  manner  was  carried  out  to 
the  utmost  extreme  of  slang  and  ribaldry.  Yet 
still  the  works,  even  of  these  last  authors,  have 
considerable  merit  in  one  point  of  view  ;  their 
language  is  level  to  the  understandings  of  all 
men  ;  it  is  an  actual  transcript  of  the  colloqui- 
alism of  the  day,  and  is  accordingly  full  of  life 
and  reality.  Roger  North's  life  of  his  brother 
the  Lord  Keeper,  is  the  most  valuable  sjjeci- 
men  of  this  class  of  our  literature  ;  it  is  delight- 
ful, and  much  beyond  any  other  of  the  writings 
of  his  contemporaries. 

From  the  common  opinion  that  the  English 
style  attained  its  greatest  perfection  in  and 
about  Queen  Ann's  reign  I  altogether  dissent; 
not  only  because  it  is  in  one  species  alone  in 
which  it  can  be  pretended  that  the  writers  of 
that  age  excelled  their  predecessors,  but  also 
because  the  specimens  themselves  are  not 
equal,  upon  sound  principles  of  judgment,  to 
much  that  had  been  produced  before.  The 
classical  structure  of  Hooker — the  impetuous, 
thought-agglomerating,    flood    of   Taylor — to 


238  COURSE  OF  LECTURES. 

these  tliere  is  no  pretence  of  a  parallel ;  and 
for  mere  ease  and  grace,  is  Cowley  inferior  to 
Addison,  being  as  he  is  so  much  more  thought- 
ful and  full  of  fancy  ?  Cowley,  with  the  omis- 
sion of  a  quaintness  here  and  there,  is  probably 
the  best  model  of  style  for  modern  imitation  in 
general.  Taylor's  periods  have  been  frequently 
attempted  by  his  admirers ;  you  may,  perhaps, 
just  catch  the  turn  of  a  simile  or  single  image, 
but  to  write  in  the  real  manner  of  Jeremy  Tay- 
lor would  require  as  mighty  a  mind  as  his. 
Many  parts  of  Algernon  Sidney's  treatises  af- 
ford excellent  exemplars  of  a  good  modern 
practical  style ;  and  Dryden  in  his  prose 
works,  is  a  still  better  model,  if  you  add  a 
stricter  and  purer  grammar.  It  is,  indeed, 
worthy  of  remark  that  all  our  great  poets  have 
been  good  prose  writers,  as  Chaucer,  Spenser, 
Milton ;  and  this  probably  arose  from  their 
just  sense  of  metre.  For  a  true  poet  will 
never  confound  verse  and  prose  ;  whereas  it  is 
almost  characteristic  of  indifferent  prose  wri- 
ters that  they  should  be  constantly  slipping 
into  scraps  of  metre.  Swift's  style  is,  in  its  line, 
perfect ;  the  manner  is  a  complete  expression 
of  the  matter,  the  terms  appropriate,  and  the 
artifice  concealed.  It  is  simplicity  in  the  true 
sense  of  the  word. 

After  the  Revolution,  the  spirit  of  the  nation 
became  much  more  commercial,  than  it  had 
been  before  ;  a  learned  body,  or  clerisy,  as 
such,  gradually  disappeared,  and  literature  in 


LECTURE  XIV.  239 

general  began  to  be  addressed  to  the  common 
miscellaneous  public.    That  public  had  become 
accustomed  to,  and  required,  a  strong  stimu- 
lus ;  and  to  meet  the  requisitions  of  the  public 
taste,  a  style  was  produced  which  by  com- 
bining triteness  of  thought  with   singularity 
and  excess  of  manner  of  expression,  was  cal- 
culated at  once  to  soothe  ignorance  and  to 
flatter   vanity.      The  thought   was   carefully 
kept  down  to  the  immediate  apprehension  of 
the  commonest  understanding,  and  the  dress 
was  as  anxiously  arranged  for  the  purpose  of 
making  the  thought  appear  something  very 
profound.     The  essence  of  this  style  consisted 
in  a  mock  antithesis,  that  is,  an  opposition  of 
mere  sounds,  in  a  rage  for  personification,  the 
abstract  made  animate,  far-fetched  metaphors, 
strange  plirases,  metrical  scraps, in  every  thing, 
in  short,  but  genuine  prose.    Style  is,  of  course, 
nothing  else  but  the  art  of  conveying  the  mean- 
ing appropriately  and  with  perspicuity,  what- 
ever that  meaning  may  be,  and  one  criterion  of 
style  is  that  it  shall  not  be  translateable  with- 
out injury  to  the  meaning.      Johnson's  style 
has  pleased  many  from  the  very  fault  of  being 
perpetually  translateable ;    he  creates  an  im- 
pression  of  cleverness  by  never  saying  any 
thing  in  a  common  way.     The  best  specimen 
of  this  manner  is  in  Junius,  because  his  anti- 
thesis is  less  merely  verbal  than   Johnson's. 
Gibbon's  manner  is  the  worst  of  all ;    it  has 
every  fault  of  which  this  peculiar  style  iscapa- 


240  COURSE  OF  LECTURES, 

ble.  Tacitus  is  an  example  of  it  in  Latin  ;  in 
coming  from  Cicero  you  feel  the  falsetto  imme- 
diately. 

In  order  to  form  a  good  style,  the  primary 
rule  and  condition  is,  not  to  attempt  to  express 
ourselves  in  language  before  we  thoroughly 
know  our  own  meaning ; — when  a  man  per- 
fectly understands  himself,  appropriate  diction 
will  generally  be  at  his  command  either  in  wri- 
ting or  speaking.  In  such  cases  the  thoughts 
and  the  words  are  associated.  In  the  next  place 
preciseness  in  the  use  of  terms  is  required,  and 
the  test  is  whether  you  can  translate  the  phrase 
adequately  into  simpler  terms,  regard  being- 
had  to  the  feeling  of  the  whole  passage.  Try 
this  upon  Shakspeare,  or  Milton,  and  see  if 
you  can  substitute  other  simpler  words  in  any 
given  passage  without  a  violation  of  the  mean- 
ing or  tone.  The  source  of  bad  writing  is  the 
desire  to  be  something  more  than  a  man  of 
sense, — the  straining  to  be  thought  a  genius ; 
and  it  is  just  the  same  in  speech  making.  If 
men  would  only  say  what  they  have  to  say  in 
plain  terms,  how  much  more  eloquent  they 
would  be  !  Another  rule  is  to  avoid  converting- 
mere  abstractions  into  persons.  I  believe  you 
will  very  rarely  find  in  any  great  writer  before 
the  Revolution  the  possessive  case  of  an  inani- 
mate noun  used  in  prose  instead  of  the  depen- 
dent case,  as  '  the  watch's  hand,'  for  '  the  hand 
of  the  watch.'  The  possessive  or  Saxon  geni- 
tive was  confined  to  persons,  or  at  least  to  ani- 


LECTURE  XIV.  24  i 

inated  subjects.  And  I  cannot  conclude  this 
Lecture  without  insisting  on  the  importance  of 
accuracy  of  style  as  being  near  akin  to  veracity 
and  truthful  habits  of  mind  ;  he  wlio  thinks 
loosely  will  write  loosely,  and,  perhaps,  there 
is  some  moral  inconvenience  in  the  common 
forms  of  our  grammars  which  give  children  so 
many  obscure  terms  for  material  distinctions. 
Let  me  also  exhort  you  to  careful  examination 
of  what  you  read,  if  it  be  worth  any  perusal  at 
all ;  such  examination  will  be  a  safeguard 
from  fanaticism,  the  universal  origin  of  which 
is  in  the  contemplation  of  phenomena  without 
investigation  into  their  causes. 


NOTES  ON  SIR  THOMAS  BROWn\s  RELIGIO  MEDICI. 


1 802 


* 


Strong  feeling  and  an  active  intellect  con- 
joined, lead  almost  necessarily,  in  the  first 
stage  of  philosophising,  to  Spinosism.  Sir  T. 
Brown  was  a  Spinosist  without  knowing  it. 

If  I  have  not  quite  all  the  faith  that  the  au- 
thor of  the  Religio  Medici  possessed,  I  have 
all  the  inclination  to  it ;  it  gives  me  pleasure  to 
believe. 

The  postscript  at  the  very  end  of  the  book  is 
well  worth  reading.  Sir  K.  Digby's  observa- 
tions, however,  are  those  of  a  pedant  in  his 

*  Cotnmunirated  bv  Mr.  Wnrdswortli.     EJ. 
VOL.  I.  R 


242  NOTKS  ON    HELIGIO  IMKDK  I. 

own  system  and  opinion.  He  ought  to  have 
considered  the  R.  M.  in  a  dramatic,  and  not 
in  a  metaphysical,  view,  as  a  sweet  exhibition 
of  character  and  passion,  and  not  as  an  expres- 
sion, or  investigation,  of  positive  truth.  The 
R.  M.  is  a  fine  portrait  of  a  liandsome  man  in 
his  best  clothes ;  it  is  much  of  what  he  was  at 
all  times,  a  good  deal  of  what  he  was  only  in 
his  best  moments.  I  have  never  read  a  book 
in  which  I  felt  greater  similarity  to  my  own 
make  of  mind — active  in  inquiry,  and  yet  with 
an  appetite  to  believe — in  short  an  affectionate 
visionary !  But  then  I  should  tell  a  different 
tale  of  my  own  heart ;  for  I  would  not  only  en- 
deavour to  tell  the  truth,  (which  I  doubt  not 
Sir  T.  B.  has  done),  but  likewise  to  tell  the 
whole  truth,  which  most  assuredly  he  has  not 
done.     However,  it  is  a  most  delicious  book. 

His  own  character  was  a  fine  mixture  of 
humourist,  genius,  and  pedant.  A  library  was 
a  living  world  to  him,  and  every  book  a  man, 
absolute  flesh  and  blood !  and  the  gravity 
with  which  he  records  contradictory  opinions 
is  exquisite. 

Part  I.  sect.  9.  Now  contrarily,  I  bless  myself,  and  am 
thankful  that  I  lived  not  in  the  days  of  miracles,  that  I  never 
saw  Christ  nor  his  disciples,  &c. 

So  say  I. 

S.  15.  I  could  never  content  my  contemplation  with  those 
general  pieces  of  wonder,  the  flux  and  reflux  of  the  sea,  the 
increase  of  Nile,  the  conversion  of  the  needle  to  the  north ; 
and  have  studied  to  match  and  parallel  those  in  the  more  ob- 


NOTES  ON   IJF.LIGIO   ^[EDiri.  243 

vious  and  neglected  pieces  of  nature ;  which  without  further 
travel  I  can  do  in  the  cosmography  of  myself;  we  carry  with 
U3  the  wonders  we  seek  without  us.  There  is  all  Africa  and 
her  prodigies  in  us ;  we  are  that  bold  and  adventurous  piece 
of  nature,  which  he  that  studies  wisely  learns  in  a  compen- 
dium what  others  labour  at  in  a  divided  piece  and  endless 
volume. 

This  is  the  true  characteristic  of  geiiius  ; 
our  destiny  and  instinct  is  to  unriddle  the 
world,  and  he  is  the  man  of  genius  who  feels 
this  instinct  fresh  and  strong  in  his  nature ; 
who  perceiving  the  riddle  and  the  mystery  of 
all  things  even  the  commonest,  needs  no 
strange  and  out-of-the-way  tales  or  images  to 
stimulate  him  into  wonder  and  a  deep  interest. 

S.  16,  17.  All  this  is  very  fine  philosophy, 
and  the  best  and  most  ingenious  defence  of 
revelation.  Moreover,  I  do  hold  and  believe 
that  a  toad  is  a  comely  animal ;  but  neverthe- 
less a  toad  is  called  ugly  by  almost  all  men, 
and  it  is  the  business  of  a  philosopher  to  ex- 
plain the  reason  of  this. 

S.  19.  This  is  exceedingly  striking.  Had 
SirT.  B.  lived  now-a-days,  he  would  probably 
have  been  a  very  ingenious  and  bold  infidel  in 
his  real  opinions,  though  the  kindness  of  his 
nature  would  have  kept  him  aloof  from  vulgar 
prating  obtrusive  infidelity. 

S.  35.  An  excellent  burlesque  on  parts  of 
the  Schoolmen,  though  I  believe  an  uninten- 
tional one. 

S.  36.  Truly  sublime— and  in  Sir  T.  B.'s 
very  best  manner. 


244  NOTF.S  ON    RI'-LKilO   MKDlCI. 

S.  .39.  This  is  a  most  admirable  passage. 
Yes,— the  history  of  a  man  for  the  nine  months 
preceding  his  birth,  would,  probably,  be  far 
more  interesting,  and  contain  events  of  greater 
moment  than  all  the  three  score  and  ten  years 
that  follow  it. 

S.  48.  This  is  made  good  by  experience,  which  can  from 
the  ashes  of  a  plant  revive  the  plant,  and  from  its  cinders  re- 
call it  into  its  stalks  and  leaves  again. 

Stuff.  This  was,  I  believe,  some  lying  boast 
of  Paracelsus,  which  the  good  Sir  T.  B.  has 
swallowed  for  a  fact. 

Part  II.  s.  2.  I  give  no  alms  to  satisfy  the  hunger  of  my 
brother,  but  to  fulfil  and  accomplish  the  will  and  command  of 
my  God. 

We  ought  not  to  relieve  a  poor  man  merely 
because  our  own  feelings  impel  us,  but  because 
these  feelings  are  just  and  proper  feelings. 
My  feelings  might  impel  me  to  revenge  with 
the  same  force  with  which  they  urge  me  to 
charity.  I  must  therefore  have  some  rule  by 
which  I  may  judge  my  feelings,— and  this  rule 
is  God's  will. 

S.  5,  6.  I  never  yet  cast  a  true  aflPection  on  a  woman  ; 
but  I  have  loved  my  friend  as  I  do  virtue,  my  soul,  my  God. 

We  cannot  love  a  friend  as  a  woman  ;  but 
we  may  love  a  woman  as  a  friend.  Friendship 
satisfies  the  highest  parts  of  our  nature ;  but  a 
wife,  who  is  capable  of  friendship,  satisfies  all. 
The  great  business  of  real  unostentatious  virtue 


NOTES  ON   RELIGIO  MEDICI.  245 

is — not  to  eradicate  any  genuine  instinct  or 
appetite  of  human  nature  ;  but — to  establish 
a  concord  and  unity  betwixt  all  parts  of  our 
nature,  to  give  a  feeling  and  a  passion  to  our 
purer  intellect,  and  to  intellectualize  our  feel- 
ings and  passions.  This  a  happy  marriage, 
blest  with  children,  effectuates  in  the  highest 
degree,  of  which  our  nature  is  capable,  and  is 
therefore  chosen  by  St.  Paul  as  the  symbol  of 
the  union  of  the  church  with  Christ ;  that  is,  of 
the  souls  of  all  good  men  with  God.  "  I  scarcely 
distinguish,"  said  once  a  good  old  man,  "  the 
wife  of  my  old  age  from  the  wife  of  my  youth  ; 
for  when  we  were  both  young,  and  she  was 
beautiful,  for  once  that  1  caressed  her  with  a 
meaner  passion,  I  caressed  her  a  thousand  times 
with  love — and  these  caresses  still  remain  to 
us."  Besides,  there  is  another  reason  why 
friendship  is  of  somewhat  less  value  than  love, 
which  includes  friendship,  it  is  this — we  may 
love  many  persons,  all  very  dearly ;  but  we 
cannot  love  many  persons  all  equally  dearly. 
There  will  be  differences,  there  will  be  grada- 
tions. But  our  nature  imperiously  asks  a 
summit,  a  resting-place ;  it  is  with  the  affec- 
tions in  love  as  with  the  reason  in  religion,  we 
cannot  diffuse  and  equalize ;  we  must  have  a 
supreme,  a  one,  the  highest.  What  is  more 
common  than  to  say  of  a  man  in  love, '  he  ido- 
lizes her,'  '  he  makes  a  god  of  her?'  Now,  in 
order  that  a  person  should  continue  to  love 
another  better  than  all  others,  it  seems  neces» 


24G  NOTES  ON   KKLKilO  MEDICI. 

sary,  that  this  I'eehiig  should  be  reciprocal. 
For  if  it  be  not  so,  sympathy  is  broken  oft'  in 
the  very  highest  point.  A.  (we  will  say  by 
way  of  illustration)  loves  B.  above  all  others,  in 
the  best  and  fullest  sense  of  the  word,  love,  but 
B.  loves  C.  above  all  others.  Either,  there- 
fore, A.  does  not  sympathize  with  B.  in  this 
most  important  feeling ;  and  then  his  love 
nnist  necessarily  be  incomplete,  and  accompa- 
nied with  a  craving  after  something  that  is  not, 
and  yet  might  be ;  or  he  does  sympathize  with 
B.  in  loving  C.  above  all  others — and  then,  of 
course,  he  loves  C.  better  than  B.  Now  it  is 
selfishness,  at  least  it  seems  so  to  me,  to  desire 
that  your  friend  should  love  you  better  than  all 
others — but  not  to  wish  that  a  wife  should. 

S,  6,  Another  misery  there  is  in  affection,  that  whom  we 
truly  love  like  ourselves,  we  forget  their  looks,  nor  can  our 
memory  retain  the  idea  of  their  faces ;  and  it  is  no  wonder  : 
for  they  are  ourselves,  and  our  affection  makes  their  looks  our 
own. 

A  thought  1  have  often  had,  and  once  ex- 
pressed it  in  almost  the  same  language.  The 
fact  is  certain,  but  the  explanation  here  given 
is  very  unsatisfactory.  For  why  do  we  never 
have  an  image  of  our  own  faces — an  image  of 
fancy,  I  mean  ? 

S.  7.  I  can  hold  there  is  no  such  thing  as  injury;  that  if 
there  be,  there  is  no  such  injury  as  revenge,  and  no  such  re- 
venge as  the  contempt  of  an  injury;  that  to  hate  another,  is 
to  malign  himself,  and  that  the  truest  way  to  love  another  is 
to  despise  ourselvei.. 


NOTES  ON   llELIGIO  MEDICI.  247 

I  thank  God  that  I  can,  with  a  full  and 
unfeigning  heart,  utter  Amen  to  this  passage. 

S.  10.     In  brief,  there  can  be  nothing  truly  alone,  and  by 
itself,  which  is  not  truly  one ;   and  such  is  only  God. 

Reciprocity  is  that  which  alone  gives  sta- 
bility to  love.  It  is  not  mere  selfishness  that 
impels  all  kind  natures  to  desire  that  there 
should  be  some  one  human  being,  to  whom  they 
are  most  dear.  It  is  because  they  wish  some 
one  being  to  exist,  who  shall  be  the  resting- 
place  and  summit  of  their  love  ;  and  this  in 
human  nature  is  not  possible,  unless  the  two 
affections  coincide.  The  reason  is,  that  the  ob- 
ject of  the  highest  love  will  not  otherwise  be 
the  same  in  both  parties. 

S.  11 .     I  thank  God  for  my  happy  dreams,  &c. 

I  am  quite  different  from  Sir  T.  B.  in  this  ; 
for  all,  or  almost  all,  the  painful  and  fearful 
thoughts  that  I  know,  are  in  my  dreams  ; — so 
much  so,  that  when  I  am  wounded  by  a  friend, 
or  receive  an  unpleasant  letter,  it  throws  me 
into  a  state  very  nearly  resembling  that  of  a 
dream. 

S.  13.  Statists  that  labour  to  contrive  a  commonwealth 
without  any  poverty,  take  away  the  object  of  our  charity,  not 
only  not  understanding  the  commonwealth  of  a  Christian,  but 
forgetting  the  prophecies  of  Christ. 

O,  for  shame !  for  shame !  Is  there  no  fit 
object  of  charity  but  abject  poverty  ?  And  what 
sort  of  a  charity  must  that  be  which  wishes 


248  KOTES  ON   JUNIUS. 

misery  in  order  that  it  may  have  the  credit  of 
relieving  a  small  part  of  it, — pulling  down  the 
comfortable  cottages  of  independent  industry 
to  build  alms-houses  out  of  the  ruins  ! 

This  book  paints  certain  parts  of  my  moral 
and  intellectual  being,  (the  best  parts,  no 
doubt,)  better  than  any  other  book  I  have  ever 
met  with ; — and  the  style  is  throughout  de- 
licious. 


NOTES  ON  JUNIUS.     1807. 
Stat  nominis  umhra. 

As  he  never  dropped  the  mask,  so  he  too  often 
used  the  poisoned  dagger  of  an  assassin. 

Dedication  to  the  English  nation. 

The  whole  of  this  dedication  reads  like  a 
string  of  aphorisms  arranged  in  chapters,  and 
classified  by  a  resemblance  of  subject,  or  a 
cento  of  points. 

lb.  If  an  honest,  and  I  may  truly  affirm  a  laborious,  zeal 
for  the  public  service  has  given  me  any  weight  in  your  esteem, 
let  me  exhort  and  conjure  you  never  to  suffer  an  invasion  of 
your  political  constitution,  however  minute  the  instance  may 
appear,  to  pass  by,  without  a  determined  persevering  resist- 
ance. 

A  longer  sentence  and  proportionately  in- 
elegant. 

lb.     II'  you  reflect  that  in  the  changes  of  administration 


NOTES  ON  JUNIUS.  249 

which  have  marked  and  disgraced  the  present  reign,  although 
your  warmest  patriots  have,  in  their  turn,  been  invested  with 
the  lawful  and  unlawful  authority  of  the  crown,  and  though 
other  reliefs  or  improvements  have  been  held  forth  to  the 
people,  yet  that  no  one  man  in  office  has  ever  promoted  or  en- 
couraged a  bill  for  shortening  the  duration  of  parliaments,  but 
that  (whoever  was  minister)  the  opposition  to  this  measure, 
ever  since  the  septennial  act  passed,  has  been  constant  and 
uniform  on  the  part  of  government. 

Long,  and  as  usual,  inelegant.  Junius  can- 
not manage  a  long  sentence  ;  it  has  all  the  ins 
and  outs  of  a  snappish  figure-dance. 

Preface. 

An  excellent  preface,  and  the  sentences  not 
so  snipt  as  in  the  dedication.  The  paragraph 
near  the  conclusion  beginning  with  "  some 
oj^inion  may  now  be  expected,"  &c.  and  ending 
with  "  relation  between  guilt  and  punishment," 
deserves  to  be  quoted  as  a  master-piece  of  rhe- 
torical ratiocination  in  a  series  of  questions 
that  permit  no  answer;  or  (as  Junius  says) 
carry  their  own  answer  along  with  them.  The 
great  art  of  Junius  is  never  to  say  too  much, 
and  to  avoid  with  equal  anxiety  a  common- 
place manner,  and  matter  that  is  not  common- 
place. If  ever  he  deviates  into  any  originality 
of  thought,  he  takes  care  that  it  shall  be  such 
as  excites  surprise  for  its  acuteness,  rather 
than  admiration  for  its  profundity.  He  takes 
care  ?  say  rather,  that  nature  took  care  for 
him.  It  is  impossible  to  detract  from  the  me- 
rit of  these  Letters  :    they  are  suited  to  their 


250  NOTES  ON  JUNIUS. 

l)iirpose,  and  perfect  in  their  kind.  They  im- 
pel to  action,  not  thought.  Had  they  been 
profound  or  subtle  in  thought,  or  majestic  and 
sweeping  in  composition,  they  would  have 
been  adapted  for  the  closet  of  a  Sidney,  or  for 
a  House  of  Lords  such  as  it  was  in  the  time  of 
Lord  Bacon ;  but  they  are  plain  and  sensible 
whenever  the  author  is  in  the  right,  and  whe- 
ther right  or  wrong,  always  shrewd  and  epi- 
grammatic, and  fitted  for  the  coffee-house,  the 
exchange,  the  lobby  of  the  House  of  Commons, 
and  to  be  read  aloud  at  a  public  meeting.  When 
connected,  dropping  the  forms  of  connection, 
desultory  without  abruptness  or  appearance  of 
disconnection,  epigrammatic  and  antithetical 
to  excess,  sententious  and  personal,  regardless 
of  right  or  wrong,  yet  well-skilled  to  act  the 
part  of  an  honest  warm-hearted  man,  and  even 
when  he  is  in  the  right,  saying  the  truth  but 
never  proving  it,  much  less  attempting  to  bot- 
tom it, — this  is  the  character  of  Junius; — and 
on  this  character,  and  in  the  mould  of  these 
writings  must  every  man  cast  himself,  who 
would  wish  in  factious  times  to  be  the  impor- 
tant and  long  remembered  agent  of  a  faction. 
1  believe  that  I  could  do  all  that  Junius  has 
done,  and  surpass  him  by  doing  many  things 
which  he  has  not  done  :  for  example, — by  an 
occasional  induction  of  startling  facts,  in  the 
manner  of  Tom  Paine,  and  lively  illustrations 
and  witty  applications  of  good  stories  and  ap- 
propriate anecdotes  in  the  manner  of  Home 


NOTES  ON  JUNIUS.  251 

Tooke.  I  believe  I  could  do  it  if  it  were  in  my 
nature  to  aim  at  this  sort  of  excellence,  or  to  be 
enamoured  of  the  fame,  and  immediate  influ- 
ence, which  would  be  its  consequence  and  re- 
Avard.  But  it  is  not  in  my  nature.  I  not  only 
love  truth,  but  I  have  a  passion  for  the  legiti- 
mate investigation  of  truth.  The  love  of  truth 
conjoined  with  a  keen  delight  in  a  strict  and 
skilful  yet  impassioned  argumentation,  is  my 
master-passion,  and  to  it  are  subordinated  even 
the  love  of  liberty  and  all  my  public  feelings— 
and  to  it  whatever  I  labour  under  of  vanity, 
ambition,  and  all  my  inward  impulses. 

Letter  I.  From  this  Letter  all  the  faults 
and  excellencies  of  Junius  may  be  exemplified. 
The  moral  and  political  aphorisms  are  just  and 
sensible,  the  irony  in  which  his  personal  satire 
is  conveyed  is  fine,  yet  always  intelligible  ;  but 
it  approaches  too  nearly  to  the  nature  of  a 
sneer  ;  the  sentences  are  cautiously  constructed 
without  the  forms  of  connection  ;  the  he  and  it 
everywhere  substituted  for  the  wlw  and  which; 
the  sentences  are  short,  laboriously  balanced, 
and  the  antitheses  stand  the  test  of  analysis 
much  better  than  Johnson's.  These  are  all 
excellencies  in  their  kind; — where  is  the  defect? 
In  this ; — there  is  too  much  of  each,  and  there  is 
a  defect  of  many  things,  the  presence  of  which 
would  have  been  not  only  valuable  for  their 
own  sakes,  but  for  the  relief  and  variety  which 
they  would  have  given.  It  is  observable  too 
that  every  Letter  adds  to  the  faults  of  these 


252  NOTES  ON  JUNIUS. 

Letters,  while  it  weakens  the  effect  of  their 
beauties. 

L.  III.  A  capital  letter,  addressed  to  a 
private  person,  and  intended  as  a  sharp  reproof 
for  intrusion.  Its  short  sentences,  its  witty 
perversions  and  deductions,  its  questions  and 
omissions  of  connectives,  all  in  their  proper 
places,  are  dramatically  good. 

L.  V.  For  my  own  part,  I  willingly  leave  it  to  the  public 
to  determine  whether  your  vindication  of  your  friend  has  been 
as  able  and  judicious  as  it  was  certainly  well  intended  ;  and 
you,  I  think,  may  be  satisfied  with  the  warm  acknowledgments 
he  already  owes  you  for  making  him  the  principal  figure  in  a 
piece  in  which,  but  for  your  amicable  assistance,  he  might  have 
passed  without  particular  notice  or  distinction. 

A  long  sentence  and,  as  usual,  inelegant  and 
cumbrous.  This  Letter  is  a  faultless  com- 
position with  exception  of  the  one  long  sen- 
tence. 

L.  Vll.  These  are  the  gloomy  companions  of  a  disturbed 
imagination  ;  the  melancholy  madness  of  poetry,  without  the 
inspiration. 

The  rhyme  is  a  fault.  '  Fancy'  had  been 
better ;  though  but  for  the  rhyme,  imagination 
is  the  fitter  word. 

lb.  Such  a  question  might  perhaps  discompose  the  gravity 
of  his  muscles,  but  1  believe  it  would  little  affect  the  tranquil- 
lity of  his  conscience. 

A  false  antithesis,  a  mere  verbal  balance ; 
there  are  far,  far  too  many  of  these.  However, 
with  these   few   exceptions,  this   Letter  is   a 


NOTES  ON  JUNIUS.  253 

blameless  composition.  Junius  may  be  safely 
studied  as  a  model  for  letters  where  he  truly 
writes  letters.  Those  to  the  Duke  of  Grafton 
and  others,  are  small  pamphlets  in  the  form  of 
letters. 

L.  VIII.  To  do  justice  to  your  Grace's  humanity,  you  felt 
for  Mac  Quick  as  you  ought  to  do  ;  and,  if  you  had  been  con- 
tented to  assist  him  indirectly,  without  a  notorious  denial  of 
justice,  or  openly  insulting  the  sense  of  the  nation,  you  might 
have  satisfied  every  duty  of  political  friendship,  without  com- 
mitting the  honour  of  your  sovereign,  or  hazarding  the  reputa- 
tion of  his  government. 

An  inelegant  cluster  of  withouts.  Junius 
asks  questions  incomparably  well ; — but  ne 
quid  nimis. 

L.  IX.  Perhaps  the  fair  way  of  considering 
these  Letters  would  be  as  a  kind  of  satirical 
poems  ;  the  short,  and  for  ever  balanced,  sen- 
tences constitute  a  true  metre ;  and  the  con- 
nection is  that  of  satiric  poetry,  a  witty  logic, 
an  association  of  thoughts  by  amusing  sem- 
blances of  cause  and  effect,  the  sophistry  of 
which  the  reader  has  an  interest  in  not  stop- 
ping to  detect,  for  it  flatters  his  love  of  mischief, 
and  makes  the  sport. 

L.  XII.  One  of  Junius's  arts,  and  which 
gives  me  a  high  notion  of  his  genius,  as  a  poet 
and  satirist,  is  this  : — he  takes  for  granted  the 
existence  of  a  character  that  never  did  and 
never  can  exist,  and  then  employs  his  wit,  and 
surprises  and  amuses  his  readers  with  analy- 
zing its  incompatibilities. 


254  NOTES  ON  JUNIUS. 

L.  XIV.  Continual  sneer,  continual  irony, 
all  excellent,  if  it  were  not  for  the  '  all;' — but 
a  countenance,  with  a  malignant  smile  in  sta- 
tuary fixure  on  it,  becomes  at  length  an  object 
of  aversion,  however  beautiful  the  face,  and 
however  beautiful  the  smile.  We  are  relieved, 
in  some  measure,  from  this  by  fretiuent  just 
and  well  expressed  moral  aphorisms  ;  but  then 
the  preceding  and  following  irony  gives  them 
the  appearance  of  proceeding  from  the  head, 
not  from  the  heart.  This  objection  would  be 
less  felt,  when  the  Letters  were  first  published 
at  considerable  intervals ;  but  Junius  wrote 
for  posterity. 

L.  XXIII.  Sneer  and  irony  continued 
with  such  gross  violation  of  good  sense,  as  to 
be  perfectly  nonsense.  The  man  who  can  ad- 
dress another  on  his  most  detestable  vices  in  a 
strain  of  cold  continual  irony,  is  himself  a 
wretch. 

L.  XXXV.  To  honour  them  with  a  determined  predilection 
and  confidence  in  exclusion  of  your  English  subjects,  who 
placed  your  family,  and,  in  spite  of  treachery  and  rebellion, 
have  supported  it  upon  the  throne,  is  a  mistake  too  gross  even 
for  the  unsuspecting  generosity  of  youth. 

The  words  '  upon  the  throne,'  stand  unfor- 
tunately for  the  harmonious  effect  of  the  ba- 
lance of  '  placed'  and  '  supported.' 

This  address  to  the  king  is  almost  faultless  in 
composition,  and  has  been  evidently  tormented 
with  the  file.  But  it  has  fewer  beauties  than 
any  other  long  letter  of  Junius ;   and  it  is  ut- 


NOTES  OX  BARCLAY  S  ARGENIS.  255 

terly  undramatic.  There  is  nothing  in  the 
style,  the  transitions,  or  the  sentiments,  which 
represents  the  passions  of  a  man  emboldening 
himself  to  address  his  sovereign  personally. 
Like  a  Presbyterian's  prayer,  you  may  sub- 
stitute almost  every  where  the  third  for  the 
second  person  without  injury.  The  news- 
paper, his  closet,  and  his  own  person  were 
alone  present  to  the  author's  intention  and 
imagination.  This  makes  the  composition 
vapid.  It  possesses  an  Isocratic  correctness, 
when  it  should  have  had  the  force  and  drama 
of  an  oration  of  Demosthenes.  From  this, 
however,  the  paragraph  beginning  with  the 
words  '  As  to  the  Scotch,'  and  also  the  last  two 
paragraphs  must  be  honourably  excepted. 
They  are,  perhaps,  the  finest  passages  in  the 
whole  collection. 


NOTES  ON  BARCLAY'S  ARGENIS.     1803.* 

Heaven  forbid  that  this  work  should  not  exist 
in  its  present  form  and  language  !  Yet  I  can- 
not avoid  the  wish  that  it  had,  during  the 
reign  of  James  I.,  been  moulded  into  an  heroic 
poem  in  English  octave  stanza,  or  epic  blank 
verse  ; — which,  however,  at  that  time  had  not 
been  invented,  and  which,  alas !  still  remains 

*  Communicated  by  the  Rev.  Derwent  Coleridge.     Ed. 


2oG  NOTES  ON  Barclay's  argenis. 

the  sole  property  of  the  inventor,  as  if  the 
Muses  had  given  him  an  unevadible  patent 
for  it.  Of  dramatic  blank  verse  we  have  many 
and  various  specimens ; — for  example,  Shaks- 
peare's  as  compared  with  Massinger's,  both 
excellent  in  their  kind  :— of  lyric,  and  of  what 
may  be  called  Orphic,  or  philosophic,  blank 
verse,  perfect  models  may  be  found  in  Words- 
worth :  of  colloquial  blank  verse  there  are  ex- 
cellent, though  not  perfect,  examples  in  Cow- 
per; — but  of  epic  blank  verse,  since  Milton, 
there  is  not  one. 

It  absolutely  distresses  me  when  I  reflect 
that  this  work,  admired  as  it  has  been  by 
great  men  of  all  ages,  and  lately,  I  hear,  by  the 
poet  Cowper,  should  be  only  not  unknown  to 
general  readers.  It  has  been  translated  into 
English  two  or  three  times — how,  I  know  not, 
wretchedly,  I  doubt  not.  It  affords  matter  for 
thought  that  the  last  translation  (or  rather,  in 
all  probability,  miserable  and  faithless  abridg- 
ment of  some  former  one)  was  given  under 
another  name.  What  a  mournful  proof  of  the 
incelebrity  of  this  great  and  amazing  work 
among  both  the  public  and  the  people !  For 
as  Wordsworth,  the  greater  of  the  two  great 
men  of  this  age, — (at  least,  except  Davy  and 
him,  I  have  known,  read  of,  heard  of,  no  others) 
— for  as  Wordsworth  did  me  the  honour  of 
once  observing  to  me,  the  people  and  the 
public  are  two  distinct  classes,  and,  as  things 
go,  the  former  is  likely  to  retain  a  better  taste, 


NOTES  ON  Barclay's  arc  en  is.  257 

the  less  it  is  acted  oii  by  the  latter.  Yet  Tele- 
machus  is  in  every  mouth,  in  every  school- 
boy's and  school-girls  hand  !  It  is  awful  to  say 
of  a  work,  like  the  Argenis,  the  style  and 
Latinity  of  which,  judged  (not  according  to 
classical  pedantry,  which  pronounces  every 
sentence  right  which  can  be  found  in  any  book 
prior  to  Boetius,  however  vicious  the  age,  or 
affected  the  author,  and  every  sentence  wrong, 
how'ever  natural  and  beautiful,  which  has 
been  of  the  author's  own  combination, — but) 
according  to  the  universal  logic  of  thought  as 
modified  by  feeling,  is  equal  to  that  of  Tacitus 
in  energy  and  genuine  conciseness,  and  is  as 
perspicuous  as  that  of  Livy,  whilst  it  is  free 
from  the  affectations,  obscurities,  and  lust  to 
surprise  of  the  former,  and  seems  a  sort  of  an- 
tithesis to  the  slowness  and  prolixity  of  the 
latter; — (this  remark  does  not,  however,  im- 
peach even  the  classicality  of  the  language, 
which,  when  the  freedom  and  originality,  the 
easy  motion  and  perfect  command  of  the 
thoughts,  are  considered,  is  truly  wonderful) : — 
of  such  a  work  it  is  awful  to  say,  that  it  would 
have  been  well  if  it  had  been  written  in  En- 
glish or  Italian  verse  !  Yet  the  event  seems  to 
justify  the  notion.  Alas!  it  is  now^  too  late. 
What  modern  work,  even  of  the  size  of  the 
Paradise  Lost — much  less  of  the  Faery  Queene 
—  would  be  read  in  the  present  day,  or  even 
bought  or  be  likely  to  be  bought,  unless  it 
were  an  instructive  work,  as  the  phrase  is,  like 
VOL.  I.  s 


258  NOTE  IN  casaubon's  pkrsius. 

Roscoe's  quartos  of  Leo  X.,  or  entertaining 
like  Bosweirs  tliree  of  Dr.  Johnson's  conver- 
sations. It  may  be  fairly  objected — what  work 
of  surpassing  merit  has  given  the  proof? — Cer- 
tainly, none.  Yet  still  there  are  ominous  facts, 
sufficient,  I  fear,  to  afford  a  certain  prophecy 
of  its  reception,  if  such  were  produced. 


NOTE  IN  CASAUBON'S  PERSIUS.     1807. 

There  are  six  hundred  and  sixteen  pages  in 
this  volume,  of  which  twenty-two  are  text ; 
and  five  hundred  and  ninety-four  commentary 
and  introductory  matter.  Yet  when  I  recol- 
lect, that  I  have  the  whole  works  of  Cicero, 
Livy,  and  Quinctilian,  with  many  others, — the 
whole  works  of  each  in  a  single  volume,  either 
thick  quarto  with  thin  paper  and  small  yet 
distinct  print,  or  thick  octavo  or  duodecimo  of 
the  same  character,  and  that  they  cost  me  in 
the  proportion  of  a  shilling  to  a  guinea  for  the 
same  quantity  of  worse  matter  in  modern 
books,   or  editions, — I   a   poor  man,  yet  one 

whom  |3(|3Atti)v   KTrjcrewc  bk  Trai^aplov   Suvog  eKpaTr](Te 

TToBoq,  feel  the  liveliest  gratitude  for  the  age, 
which  produced  such  editions,  and  for  the  edu- 
cation, which  by  enabling  me  to  understand 
and  taste  the  Greek  and  Latin  writers,  has 
thus  put  it  in  my  power  to  collect  on  my  own 
shelves,  for  my  actual  use,  almost  all  the  best 


NOTES  ON  chapman's  HOMER.  259 

])Ooks  ill  spite  of  my  small  income.  Some- 
what too  I  am  indebted  to  the  ostentation  of 
expense  among  the  rich,  which  has  occasioned 
these  cheap  editions  to  become  so  dispropor- 
tionately cheap. 


NOTES  ON  CHAPMAN'S  HOMER. 

EXTRACT  OF  A  LETTER  SENT  WITH  THE  VOLUME.*   1807, 

Chapman  I  have  sent  in  order  that  you  might 
read  the  Odyssey ;  the  Iliad  is  fine,  but  less 
equal  in  the  translation,  as  well  as  less  inte- 
resting in  itself.  What  is  stupidly  said  of 
Shakspeare,  is  really  true  and  appropriate  of 
Chapman ;  mighty  faults  counterpoised  by 
mighty  beauties.  Excepting  his  quaint  epi- 
thets which  he  affects  to  render  literally  from 
the  Greek,  a  language  above  all  others  blest  in 
the  happy  marriage  of  sweet  words,  and  which 
in  our  language  are  mere  printer's  compound 
epithets— such  as  quaffed  divine  joy-in-the- 
heart'of-man-inf using  wine,  (the  undermarked 
is  to  be  one  word,  because  one  sweet  mellifluous 
word  expresses  it  in  Homer)  ; — excepting  this, 
it  has  no  look,  no  air,  of  a  translation.  It  is 
as  truly  an  original  poem  as  the  Faery 
Queene ; — it  will  give  you  small  idea  of  Homer, 

*  Commuricated  ihrouo-h  Mr.  Wordsworth.     Ed. 


2n0  NOTKS  ON  chapman's   HOMEK. 

though  a  far  truer  one  than  Pope's  epigrams, 
or  Cowper's  cumbersome  most  anti-Homeric 
Miltonism.  For  Chapman  writes  and  feels  as  a 
poet, — as  Homer  might  have  written  had  he 
lived  in  Enghmd  in  the  reign  of  Queen  EUza- 
beth.  In  short,  it  is  an  exquisite  poem,  in  spite 
of  its  frequent  and  perverse  quaintnesses  and 
harshnesses,  which  are,  however,  amply  repaid 
by  almost  unexampled  sweetness  and  beauty 
of  language,  all  over  spirit  and  feeling.  In 
the  main  it  is  an  English  heroic  poem,  the  tale 
of  which  is  borrowed  from  the  Greek.  The 
dedication  to  the  Iliad  is  a  noble  copy  of  verses, 
especially  those  sublime  lines  beginning, — 


O  !  'tis  wondrous  much 
(Though  nothing  priscle)  that  the  right  vertuous  touch 
Of  a  well  written  soule,  to  vertue  moves. 
Nor  haue  we  soules  to  purpose,  if  their  loves 
Of  fitting  objects  be  not  so  inflam'd. 

How  much  then,  were  this  kingdome's  maine  soule  maim'd. 
To  want  this  great  inflamer  of  all  powers 
That  move  in  humane  soules !   All  realmes  but  yours, 
Are  honor'd  with  him ;   and  hold  blest  that  state 
That  have  his  workes  to  reade  and  contemplate. 
In  which,  humanitie  to  her  height  is  raisde ; 
Which  all  the  world  (yet,  none  enough)  hath  praisde. 
Seas,  earth,  and  heaven,  he  did  in  verse  comprize; 
Out  sung  the  Muses,  and  did  equalise 
Their  king  Apollo ;  being  so  farre  from  cause 
Of  princes  light  thoughts,  that  their  gravest  lawes 
May  finde  stufFe  to  be  fashiond  by  his  lines. 
Through  all  the  pompe  of  kingdomes  still  he  shines 
And  graceth  all  his  gracers.     Then  let  lie 
Your  lutes,  and  viols,  and  more  loftily 


NOTES  ON  chapman's  homeu.     26 E 

Make  the  heroiques  of  your  Homer  sung, 

To  drums  and  trumpets  set  his  Angels  tongue  : 

And  with  the  princely  sports  of  haukes  you  use, 

Behold  the  kingly  flight  of  his  high  Muse : 

And  see  how  like  the  Phoenix  she  renues 

Her  age,  and  starrie  feathers  in  your  sunne ; 

Thousands  of  yeares  attending  ;  everie  one 

Blowing  the  holy  fire,  and  throwing  in 

Their  seasons,  kingdomes,  nations  that  have  bin 

Subverted  in  them ;  lawes,  religions,  all 

OfFerd  to  change,  and  greedie  funerall ; 

Yet  still  your  Homer  lasting,  living,  raigning. — 

and  likewise  the  1st,  the  11  th,  and  last  but  one, 
of  the  prefatory  sonnets  to  the  Odyssey.  Could 
I  have  foreseen  any  other  speedy  opportunity, 
I  should  have  begged  your  acceptance  of  the 
volume  in  a  somewhat  handsomer  coat ;  but 
as  it  is,  it  will  better  represent  the  sender, — to 
quote  from  myself — 

A  man  disherited,  in  form  and  face, 

By  nature  and  mishap,  of  outward  grace. 

Chapman  in  his  moral  heroic  verse,  as  in  this  Dedication  to 
dedication  and  the  prefatory  sonnets  to  his  P"'^*^®  ^®^'"y 
Odyssey,  stands  above  Ben  Jonson ;  there  is 
more  dignity,  more  lustre,  and  equal  strength ; 
but  not  midway  quite  between  him  and  the 
sonnets  of  Milton.  I  do  not  know  whether  I 
give  him  the  higher  praise,  in  that  he  reminds 
me  of  Ben  Jonson  with  a  sense  of  his  superior 
excellence,  or  that  he  brings  Milton  to  memory 
notwithstanding  his  inferiority.  His  moral 
poems  are  not  quite  out  of  books  like  Jonson's, 


262 


NOTES  ON  CHAPMAN  S  HOMER. 


Epistle  Dedi- 
catorie  to  the 
Odyssey. 


K])istle  ])edi- 
fdtorie  to  tJie 
Batrachomyo- 
machia. 


nor  yet  do  the  sentiments  so  wholly  grow  up 
out  of"  his  own  natural  habit  and  grandeur  of 
thought,  as  in  Milton.  The  sentiments  have 
been  attracted  to  him  by  a  natural  affinity  of 
his  intellect,  and  so  combined; — but  Jonson 
has  taken  them  by  individual  and  successive 
acts  of  choice. 

All  this  and  the  preceding  is  well  felt  and 
vigorously,  though  harshly,  expressed,  respect- 
ing sublime  poetry  in  genere;  but  in  reading- 
Homer  1  look  about  me,  and  ask  how  does  all 
this  apply  here.  For  surely  never  was  there 
plainer  writing  ;  there  are  a  thousand  charms 
of  sun  and  moonbeam,  ripple,  and  wave,  and 
stormy  billow,  but  all  on  the  surface.  Had 
Chapman  read  Proclus  and  Porphyry? — and 
did  he  really  believe  them, — or  even  that  they 
believed  themselves?  They  felt  the  immense 
power  of  a  Bible,  a  Shaster,  a  Koran.  There 
was  none  in  Greece  or  Rome,  and  they  tried 
therefore  by  subtle  allegorical  accommodations 
to  conjure  the  poem  of  Homer  into  the  jSt/SAtov 
0£O7rap«Sorov  of  Greek  faith. 

Chapman's  identification  of  his  fate  with  Ho- 
mer's, and  his  complete  forgetful ness  of  the 
distinction  between  Christianity  and  idolatry, 
under  the  general  feeling  of  some  religion,  is 
very  interesting.  It  is  amusing  to  observe,  how 
familiar  Chapman's  fancy  has  become  with 
Homer,  his  life  and  its  circumstances,  though 
the  very  existence  of  any  such  individual,  at 
least  with  regard  to  the  Iliad  and  the  Hymns, 


NOTE  IN  Baxter's  life  of  himself.     263 

is  more  than  problematic.  N.  B.  The  rude 
engraving  in  the  page  was  designed  by  no 
vulgar  hand.     It  is  full  of  spirit  and  passion. 

I  am  so  dull,  that  neither  in  the  original  nor  Es.dofthe 
in  any  translation  could  I  ever  find  any  wit  or  Katrachomy- 
wise  purpose  in  this  poem.  The  whole  humour 
seems  to  lie  in  the  names.  The  frogs  and 
mice  are  not  frogs  or  mice,  but  men,  and  yet 
they  do  nothing  that  conveys  any  satire.  In 
the  Greek  there  is  much  beauty  of  language, 
but  the  joke  is  very  flat.  This  is  always  the 
case  in  rude  ages ; — their  serious  vein  is  inimi- 
table,— their  comic  low  and  low  indeed.  The 
psychological  cause  is  easily  stated,  and  copi- 
ously exemplifiable. 


NOTE  IN  BAXTER'S  LIFE  OF  HIMSELF.     1820. 

Amqnct  the  grounds  for  recommending  the  pe- 
rusal of  our  elder  writers — Hooker — Taylor- 
Baxter — in  short  almost  any  of  the  folios  com- 
posed from  Edward  VI.  to  Charles  II.  I  note 
1.  The  overcoming  the  habit  of  deriving 
your  whole  pleasure  passively  from  the  book 
itself,  which  can  only  be  effected  by  excite- 
ment of  curiosity  or  of  some  passion.  Force 
yourself  to  reflect  on  what  you  read  paragraph 
by  paragraph,  and  in  a  short  time  you  will 
derive  your  pleasure,  an  ample  portion  of  it,  at 
least,  from  the  activity  of  your  own  mind.  All 
f3lse  is  picture  sunshine. 


264       NOTE  IN    BA\I"i:irs  LIFE  OF   HIMSELF. 

'2.  The  coiKiiiest  of  party  and  sectarian  pre- 
indices,  when  you  have  on  the  same  table 
before  you  the  works  of  a  Hammond  and  a  Bax- 
ter, and  reflect  how  many  and  how  momentous 
their  points  of  agreement,  how  few  and  ahiiost 
childish  the  differences,  which  estranged  and 
irritated  these  good  men.  Let  us  but  imagine 
what  tiieir  blessed  spirits  now  feel  at  the  retro- 
spect of  their  earthly  frailties,  and  can  we 
do  other  than  strive  to  feel  as  they  now  feel, 
not  as  they  once  felt?  So  will  it  be  with  the 
disputes  between  good  men  of  the  present 
day  ;  and  if  you  have  no  other  reason  to  doubt 
your  opponent's  goodness  than  the  point  in  dis- 
pute, think  of  Baxter  and  Hammond,  of  Mil- 
ton and  Taylor,  and  let  it  be  no  reason  at  all. 

3.  It  will  secure  you  from  the  narrow  ido- 
latry of  the  present  times  and  fashions,  and 
create  the  noblest  kind  of  imaginative  power 
in  your  soul,  that  of  living  in  past  ages ; — 
wholly  devoid  of  which  power,  a  man  can  nei- 
ther anticipate  the  future,  nor  ever  live  a  truly 
human  life,  a  life  of  reason  in  the  present. 

4.  In  this  particular  work  we  may  derive  a 
most  instructive  lesson,  that  in  certain  points, 
as  of  religion  in  relation  to  law,  the  medio  tutis- 
simus  ibis,  is  inapplicable.  There  is  no  medium 
possible ;  and  all  the  attempts  as  those  of 
Baxter,  though  no  more  were  lequired  than 
*  I  believe  in  God  through  Christ,'  prove  only 
the  mildness  of  the  proposer's  temper,  but  as  a 
rule  would  be  either  equal  to  nothing,  at  least 


NOTE  IN  Baxter's  life  oe  himself.     265 

exclude  only  the  two  or  three  in  a  century 
that  make  it  a  matter  of  religion  to  declare 
themselves  atheists,  or  else  be  just  as  fruitful  a 
rule  for  a  persecutor  as  the  most  complete  set 
of  articles  that  could  be  framed  by  a  Spanish 
Inquisition.      For  to  '  believe'  must  mean  to 
believe  aright — and  '  God'  must  mean  the  true 
God — and  '  Christ'  the  Christ  in  the  sense  and 
with  the  attributes  understood  by  Christians 
who   are   truly    Christians.       An   established 
church  with  a  liturgy  is  the  sufficient  solution 
of  the  problem  cle  jure  mag  istratus.    Articles  of 
faith  are  in  this  point  of  view  superfluous  ;  for 
is  it  not  too  absurd  for  a  man  to  hesitate  at 
subscribing  his  name  to  doctrines  which  yet  in 
the  more  awful  duty  of  prayer  and  profession 
he  dares  affirm  before  his  Maker  !  They  are 
therefore,  in  this  sense,  merely  superfluous ; — 
not   worth    re-enacting,  had  they  ever   been 
done  away  with  ; — not  worth  removing  now  that 
they  exist. 

5.  The  characteristic  contra-distinction  be- 
tween the  speculative  reason  ers  of  the  age  be- 
fore the  Revolution,  and  those  since,  is  this:— the 
former  cultivated  metaphysics  without,  or  neg- 
lecting empirical,  psychology  : — the  latter  cul- 
tivate a  mechanical  psychology  to  the  neglect 
and  contempt  of  metaphysics.  Both,  therefore, 
are  almost  equi-distant  from  true  philosophy. 
Hence  the  belief  in  ghosts,  witches,  sensible 
replies  to  prayer,  &c.  in  Baxter  and  in  a  hun- 
dred others.     See  also  Luther's  Table  Talk. 


266         FRAGMENT  OF  AN   ESSAY  ON  TASTE. 

(j.  The  earlier  part  of  tliis  volume  is  interest- 
ing as  materials  for  medical  history.  The 
state  of  medical  science  in  the  reign  of  Charles 
I.  was  almost  incredibly  low. 


FRAGMENT  OF  AN  ESSAY  ON  TASTE.     1810. 

The  same  arguments  that  decide  the  question, 
whether  taste  has  any  fixed  principles,  may 
probably  lead  to  a  determination  of  what  those 
principles  are.  First  then,  what  is  taste  in  its 
metaphorical  sense,  or,  which  will  be  the 
easiest  mode  of  arriving  at  the  same  solution, 
what  is  there  in  the  primary  sense  of  the  word, 
which  may  give  to  its  metaphorical  meaning 
an  import  different  from  that  of  sight  or  hear- 
ing, on  the  one  hand,  and  of  touch  or  smell  on 
the  other?  And  this  question  seems  the  more 
natural,  because  in  correct  language  we  confine 
beauty,  the  main  subject  of  taste,  to  objects  of 
sight  and  combinations  of  sounds,  and  never, 
except  sportively  or  by  abuse  of  words,  speak 
of  a  beautiful  flavour  or  a  beautiful  scent. 

Now  the  analysis  of  our  senses  in  the  com- 
monest books  of  anthropology  has  drawn  our 
attention  to  the  distinction  between  the  per- 
fectly organic,  and  the  mixed  senses ; — the 
first  presenting  objects,  as  distinct  from  the 
perception  ; — the  last  as  blending  the  percep- 
tion with  the  sense  of  the  object.     Our  eyes 


MiAGMENT  OF  AN   ESSAY  ON  TASTE.         267 

and  ears — (I  am  not  now  considering  what  is 
or  is  not  the  case  really,  but  only  that  of  which 
we  are  regularly  conscious  as  appearances,) 
our  eyes  most  often  appear  to  us  perfect  organs 
of  the  sentient  principle,  and  wholly  in  action, 
and  our  hearing  so  much  more  so  than  the 
three  other  senses,  and  in  all  the  ordinary  ex- 
ertions of  that  sense,  perhaps,  equally  so  with 
the  sight,  that  all  languages  place  them  in  one 
class,  and  express  their  different  modifications 
by  nearly  the  same  metaphors.     The  three  re- 
maining  senses   appear  in  part  passive,  and 
combine  with  the  perception  of  the  outward 
object  a  distinct  sense  of  our  own  life.     Taste, 
therefore,  as  opposed  to  vision  and  sound,  will 
teach  us  to  expect  in  its  metaphorical  use  a 
certain  reference  of  any  given  object  to  our 
own  being,  and  not  merely  a  distinct  notion  of 
the  object  as  in  itself,  or  in  its  independent 
properties.     From  the  sense  of  touch,  on  the 
other  hand,   it   is  distinguishable  by   adding 
to  this  reference  to  our  vital  being  some  degree 
of  enjoyment,  or  the  contrary, — some  percep- 
tible impulse  from  pleasure  or  pain  to  com- 
placency or  dislike.     The  sense  of  smell,  in- 
deed, might  perhaps  have  furnished  a  meta- 
phor of  the  same  import  with  that  of  taste  ;  but 
the  latter  was  naturally  chosen  by  the  majority 
of  civilized  nations  on  account  of  the  greater 
frequency,  importance,  and  dignity  of  its  em- 
ployment or  exertion  in  human  nature. 

By  taste,  therefore,  as  applied  to  the  fine 


2G8         FRAGMENT  OF  AN   ESSAY   ON  TASTE. 

arts,  we  must  be  supposed  to  mean  an  intel- 
lectual perception  of  any  object  blended  with 
a  distinct  reference  to  our  own  sensibility  of 
pain  or  pleasure,  or,  vice  versa,  a  sense  of  en- 
joyment or  dislike  co-instantaneously  combined 
with,  and  appearing  to  proceed  from,  some  in- 
tellectual perception  of  theobject ; — intellectual 
perception,  1  say ;  for  otherwise  it  would  be 
a  definition  of  taste  in  its  primary  rather  than 
in  its  metaphorical  sense.  Briefiy,  taste  is  a 
metaphor  taken  from  one  of  our  mixed  senses, 
and  applied  to  objects  of  the  more  purely  or- 
ganic senses,  and  of  our  moral  sense,  when  we 
would  imply  the  co-existence  of  immediate 
personal  dislike  or  complacency.  In  this  defi- 
nition of  taste,  therefore,  is  involved  the  defi- 
nition of  fine  arts,  namely,  as  being  such  the 
chief  and  discriminative  purpose  of  which  it  is 
to  gratify  the  taste, — that  is,  not  merely  to  con- 
nect, but  to  combine  and  unite,  a  sense  of  im- 
mediate pleasure  in  ourselves,  with  the  per- 
ception of  external  arrangement. 

The  great  question,  therefore,  whether  taste 
in  any  one  of  the  fine  arts  has  any  fixed  prin- 
ciple or  ideal,  will  find  its  solution  in  the  ascer- 
tainment of  two  facts  : — first,  whether  in  every 
determination  of  the  taste  concerning  any  work 
of  the  fine  arts,  the  individual  does  not,  with 
or  even  against  the  approbation  of  his  general 
judgment,  involuntarily  claim  that  all  other 
minds  ought  to  think  and  feel  the  same  ;  whe- 
ther the  common  expressions,  '  1  dare  S9y  I 


FRAGMENT  OF  AN   ESSAY  ON  TASTE.         2G9 

may  be  wrong,  but  that  is  my  particular 
taste;' — are  uttered  as  an  offering  of  courtesy, 
as  a  sacrifice  to  the  undoubted  fact  of  our  indi- 
vidual fallibility,  or  are  spoken  with  perfect 
sincerity,  not  only  of  the  reason  but  of  the 
whole  feeling,  with  the  same  entireness  of 
mind  and  heart,  with  which  we  concede  a 
right  to  every  person  to  differ  from  another  in 
his  preference  of  bodily  tastes  and  flavours. 
If  we  should  find  ourselves  compelled  to  deny 
this,  and  to  admit  that,  notwithstanding  the 
consciousness  of  our  liability  to  error,  and  in 
spite  of  all  those  many  individual  experiences 
which  may  have  strengthened  the  conscious- 
ness, each  man  does  at  the  moment  so  far  le- 
gislate for  all  men,  as  to  believe  of  necessity 
that  he  is  either  right  or  wrong,  and  that  if 
it  be  right  for  him,  it  is  universally  right, — we 
must  then  proceed  to  ascertain  : — secondly, 
whether  the  source  of  these  phenomena  is  at 
all  to  be  found  in  those  parts  of  our  nature,  in 
which  each  intellect  is  representative  of  all, — 
and  whether  wholly,  or  partially.  No  person 
of  common  reflection  demands  even  in  feeling, 
that  what  tastes  pleasant  to  him  ought  to  pro- 
duce the  same  effect  on  all  living  beings ;  but 
every  man  does  and  must  expect  and  demand 
the  universal  acquiescence  of  all  intelligent  be- 
ings in  every  conviction  of  his  understanding. 
***** 


270 


FRAGMENT  OF  AN  ESSAY  ON  BEAUTY.     1818. 

The  only  necessary,  but  this  the  absolutely 
necessary,  pre-requisite  to  a  full  insight  into 
the  grounds  of  the  beauty  in  the  objects  of  sight, 
is — the  directing  of  the  attention  to  the  action 
of  those  thoughts  in  our  own  mind  which  are 
not  consciously  distinguished.  Every  man  may 
understand  this,  if  he  will  but  recall  the  state 
of  his  feelings  in  endeavouring  to  recollect  a 
name,  which  he  is  quite  sure  that  he  remem- 
bers, though  he  cannot  force  it  back  into  con- 
sciousness. Thisregion  of  unconscious  tlioughts, 
oftentimes  the  more  working  the  more  indistinct 
they  are,  may,  in  reference  to  this  subject,  be 
conceived  as  forming  an  ascending  scale  from 
the  most  universal  associations  of  motion  with 
the  functions  and  passions  of  life, — as  when, 
on  passing  out  of  a  crowded  city  into  the  fields 
on  a  day  in  June,  we  describe  the  grass  and 
king-cups  as  nodding  their  heads  and  dancing 
in  the  breeze,— up  to  the  half  perceived,  yet 
not  fixable,  resemblance  of  a  form  to  some  par- 
ticular object  of  a  diverse  class,  which  resem- 
blance we  need  only  increase  but  a  little,  to 
destroy,  or  at  least  injure,  its  beauty-enhanc- 
ing effect,  and  to  make  it  a  fantastic  intrusion 
of  the  accidental  and  the  arbitrary,  and  con- 
sequently a  disturbance  of  the  beautifid.    This 


FRAGMENT  OI-   AN   ESSAY  ON  BEAUTY.         271 

might  be  abundantly  exemplified  and    illus- 
trated from  the  paintings  of  Salvator  Rosa. 

I  am  now  using  the  term  beauty  in  its  most 
comprehensive  sense,  as  including  expression 
and  artistic  interest, — that  is,  I  consider  not 
only  the  living  balance,  but  likewise  all  the 
accompaniments  that  even  by  disturbing  are 
necessary  to  the  renewal  and  continuance  of 
the  balance.  And  in  this  sense  I  proceed  to 
show,  that  the  beautiful  in  the  object  may  be 
referred  to  two  elements, — lines  and  colours ; 
the  first  belonging  to  the  shapely  (forma ^  for- 
malism formosus),  and  in  this,  to  the  law,  and 
the  reason ;  and  the  second,  to  the  lively,  the 
free,  the  spontaneous,  and  the  self-justifying. 
As  to  lines,  the  rectilineal  are  in  themselves 
the  lifeless,  the  determined  ah  extra,  but  still 
in  innnediate  union  with  the  cycloidal,  which 
are  expressive  of  function.  The  curve  line  is 
a  modification  of  the  force  from  without  by  the 
force  from  within,  or  the  spontaneous.  These 
are  not  arbitrary  symbols,  but  the  language  of 
nature,  universal  and  intuitive,  by  virtue  of 
the  law  by  which  man  is  impelled  to  explain 
visible  motions  by  imaginary  causative  powei'S 
analogous  to  his  own  acts,  as  the  Dryads,  Ha- 
madryads, Naiads,  &c. 

The  better  way  of  applying  these  principles 
will  be  by  a  brief  and  rapid  sketch  of  the  his- 
tory of  the  fine  arts,— in  which  it  will  be  found, 
that  the  beautiful  in  nature  has  been  appro- 
priated to  the  works  of  man,  just  in  proportion 


272       FRAGMENT  OF  AN  ESSAY  ON   BEAUTY. 

as  the  state  of  tlie  mind  in  tlie  artists  tlieni- 
selves  approached  to  the  subjective  beauty. 
Determine  what  predominance  in  the  minds  of 
the  men  is  preventive  of  the  living  balance  of 
excited  faculties,  and  you  will  discover  the 
exact  counterpart  in  the  outward  products. 
Egypt  is  an  illustration  of  this.  Shapeliness 
is  intellect  without  freedom  ;  but  colours  are 
significant.  The  introduction  of  the  arch  is 
not  less  an  epoch  in  the  fine  than  in  the  useful 
arts. 

Order  is  beautiful  arrangement  without  any 
purpose  ad  extra; — therefore  there  is  a  beauty 
of  order,  or  order  may  be  contemplated  exclu- 
sively as  beauty. 

The  form  given  in  every  empirical  intuition, 
— the  stuff,  that  is,  the  quality  of  the  stuff,  de- 
termines the  agreeable  :  but  when  a  thing  ex- 
cites us  to  receive  it  in  such  and  such  a  mould, 
so  that  its  exact  correspondence  to  that  mould 
is  what  occupies  the  mind, — this  is  taste  or  the 
sense  of  beauty.  Whether  dishes  full  of  painted 
wood  or  exquisite  viands  were  laid  out  on  a 
table  in  the  same  arrangement,  would  be  indif- 
ferent to  the  taste,  as  in  ladies'  patterns ;  but 
surely  the  one  is  far  more  agreeable  than  the 
other.  Hence  observe  the  disinterestedness  of 
all  taste  ;  and  hence  also  a  sensual  perfection 
with  intellect  is  occasionally  possible  without 
moral  feeling.  So  it  may  be  in  music  and 
painting,  but  not  in  poetry.  How  far  it  is  a 
real  preference  of  the  refined  to  the  gross  plea- 


FRAGMENT  OF  AN    ESSAY  ON  BEAUTY.       273 

siires,  is  another  question,  upon  the  supposition 
that  pleasure,  in  some  form  or  other,  is  that  alone 
which  determines  men  to  the  objects  of  the 
former; — \Yhether  experience  does  not  show- 
that  if  the  latter  were  equally  in  our  power, 
occasioned  no  more  trouble  to  enjoy,  and  caused 
no  more  exhaustion  of  the  power  of  enjoying 
them  by  the  enjoyment  itself,  we  should  in  real 
practice  prefer  the  grosser  pleasure.  It  is  not, 
therefore,  any  excellence  in  the  quality  of  the 
refined  pleasures  themselves,  but  the  advan- 
tages and  facilities  in  the  means  of  enjoying 
them,  that  give  them  the  pre-eminence. 

This  is,  of  course,  on  the  supposition  of  the 
absence  of  all  moral  feeling.  Suppose  its 
presence,  and  then  there  will  accrue  an  excel- 
lence even  to  the  quality  of  the  pleasures  them- 
selves ;  not  only,  however,  of  the  refined,  but 
also  of  the  grosser  kinds, — inasmuch  as  a 
larger  sweep  of  thoughts  will  be  associated 
with  each  enjoyment,  and  with  each  thought 
will  be  associated  a  number  of  sensations  ;  and 
so,  consequently,  each  pleasure  will  become 
more  the  pleasure  of  the  whole  being.  This 
is  one  of  the  earthly  rewards  of  our  being  what 
we  ought  to  be,  but  which  would  be  annihi- 
lated, if  we  attempted  to  be  it  for  the  sake  of 
this  increased  enjoyment.  Indeed  it  is  a  con- 
tradiction to  suppose  it.  Yet  this  is  the  com- 
mon argumentmn  in  ciicido,  in  which  the  eu- 

dsemonists  flee  and  pursue. 

*  #  *  * 

VOL.   I.  T 


POEMS  AND  POETICAL  FRAGMENTS. 


Vivamtis,  mea  Lesbia,  atque  amemus.     Catullus. 

My  Lesbia,  let  us  love  and  live, 
And  to  the  winds,  my  Lesbia,  give 
Each  cold  restraint,  each  boding  fear 
Of  age,  and  all  its  saws  severe  ! 
Yon  sun  now  posting  to  the  main 
Will  set, — but  'tis  to  rise  again ; — 
But  we,  when  once  our  little  light 
Is  set,  must  sleep  in  endless  night. 
Then  come,  with  whom  alone  I'll  live, 
A  thousand  kisses  take  and  give  ! 
Another  thousand  ! — to  the  store 
Add  hundreds — then  a  thousand  more  ! 
And  when  they  to  a  million  mount. 
Let  confusion  take  the  account, — 
That  you,  the  number  never  knowing, 
May  continue  still  bestowing — 
That  I  for  joys  may  never  pine. 
Which  never  can  again  be  mine  !* 


Lugete,  O  Veneres,  Cupidinesque.     Catullus. 

Pity,  mourn  in  plaintive  tone 
The  lovely  starling  dead  and  gone ! 
Pity  mourns  in  plaintive  tone 
The  lovely  starling  dead  and  gone. 

*  Tliis  and  the  following  poems  and  fragments,  with  the  exception  of 
those  marked  with  an  asterisk,  were  communicated  by  Mr.  Gutch.  Ed. 


POETICAL  FRAGMENTS.  275 

Weep,  ye  Loves  !  and  Venus,  weep 
The  lovely  starling  fall'n  asleep  ! 
Venus  see  with  tearful  eyes — 
In  her  lap  the  starling  lies, 
While  the  Loves  all  in  a  ring- 
Softly  stroke  the  stiffen'd  wing. 


Moriens  sttperstiti. 

"  The  hour-bell  sounds,  and  I  must  go ; 

Death  waits — again  I  hear  him  calling; — 

No  cowardly  desires  have  I, 

Nor  will  I  shun  his  face  appalling. 

I  die  in  faith  and  honour  rich — 

But  ah !  I  leave  behind  my  treasure 

In  widowhood  and  lonely  pain ; — 

To  live  were  surely  then  a  pleasure  ! 

"  My  lifeless  eyes  upon  thy  face 
Shall  never  open  more  to-morrow ;     "* 
To-morrow  shall  thy  beauteous  eyes 
Be  closed  to  love,  and  drown'd  in  sorrow ; 
To-morrow  death  shall  freeze  this  hand. 
And  on  thy  breast,  my  wedded  treasure, 
I  never,  never  more  shall  live ; — 
Alas  !  I  quit  a  life  of  pleasure." 


Morienti  superstes. 

"  Yet  art  thou  happier  far  than  she 
Who  feels  the  widow's  love  for  thee ! 
For  while  her  days  are  days  of  weeping. 
Thou,  in  peace,  in  silence  sleeping, 
III  some  still  world,  unknown,  remote, 


276  POETICAL  FRAGMENTS. 

The  mighty  parent's  care  hast  found, 
Without  whose  tender  guardian  thought 
No  sparrow  falleth  to  the  ground." 


THE  STRIPLING'S  WAR  SONG. 

IMITATED  FROM  STOLBERG. 

My  noble  old  warrior !  this  lieart  has  beat  high, 
Since  you  told  of  the  deeds  that  our  countrymen  wrought ; 
Ah !  give  me  the  sabre  which  hung  by  thy  thigh, 
And  I  too  will  fight  as  my  forefathers  fought ! 

O,  despise  not  my  youth  !  for  my  spirit  is  steel'd, 
And  I  know  there  is  strength  in  the  grasp  of  my  hand ; 
Yea,  as  firm  as  thyself  would  I  move  to  the  field. 
And  as  proudly  would  die  for  my  dear  father-land. 

In  the  sports  of  my  childhood  I  mimick'd  the  fight, — - 
The  shrill  of  a  trumpet  suspended  my  breath ; 
And  my  fancy  still  wander'd  by  day  and  by  night 
Amid  tumult  and  perils,  'mid  conquest  and  death. 

My  own  eager  shout  in  the  heat  of  my  trance. 
How  oft  it  awakes  me  from  dreams  full  of  glory, 
When  I  meant  to  have  leap'd  on  the  hero  of  France, 
And  have  dash'd  him  to  earth  pale  and  deathless  and 
gory  ! 

As  late  through  the  city  with  bannerets  streaming, 
And  the  music  of  trumpets  the  warriors  flew  by, — 
With  helmet  and  scymetar  naked  and  gleaming 
On  their  proud  trampling  thunder-hoof 'd  steeds  did 
they  fly,— 

I  sped  to  yon  heath  which  is  lonely  and  bare — 
For  each  nerve  was  unquiet,  each  pulse  in  alarm, — 


POETICAL  FRAGMENTS.  277 

I  huiTd  my  mock  lance  through  the  objectless  air, 
And  in  open-eyed  dream  prov'd  the  strength  of  my  arm. 

Yes,  noble  old  warrior !  this  heart  has  beat  high. 
Since  you  told  of  the  deeds  that  our  countrymen  wrought; 
Ah  !  give  me  the  falchion  that  hung  by  thy  thigh. 
And  I  too  will  fight  as  my  forefathers  fought ! 


*His  own  fair  countenance,  his  kingly  forehead, 

His  tender  smiles,  love's  day-dawn  on  his  lips. 

The  sense,  and  spirit,  and  the  light  divine. 

At  the  same  moment  in  his  steadfast  eye 

Were  virtue's  native  crest,  th'  immortal  soul's 

Unconscious  meek  self-heraldry, — to  man 

Genial,  and  pleasant  to  his  guardian  angel. 

He  sufFer'd,  nor  complain'd  ; — tho'  oft  with  tears 

He  mourn'd  th'  oppression  of  his  helpless  brethren, — 

Yea,  with  a  deeper  and  yet  holier  grief 

Moui'n'd  for  the  oppressor.     In  those  sabbath  hours 

His  solemn  grief,  like  the  slow  cloud  at  sunset. 

Was  but  the  veil  of  purest  meditation 

Pierced  thro'  and  saturate  with  the  rays  of  mind. 


'Twas  sweet  to  know  it  only  possible  ! 
Some  wishes  cross'd  my  mind  and  dimly  cheer'd  it, 
And  one  or  two  poor  melancholy  pleasures, 
Each  in  the  pale  unwarming  light  of  hope 
Silvering  its  flimsy  wing,  flew  silent  by — 
Moths  in  the  moonbeam  ! — 


—  Behind  the  thin 
Grey  cloud  that  cover'd,  but  not  hid,  the  sky. 
The  round  full  moon  look'd  small. 


278  POETICAL  FRAGMENTS. 

The  subtle  snow  in  every  passing  breeze 

Rose  curling;  from  the  c;rove  like  shafts  of  smoke. 


—  On  the  broad  mountain  top 
The  neighing  wild  colt  races  with  the  wind 
O'er  fern  and  heath-flowers. 


—  Like  a  mighty  giantess 
Seized  in  sore  travail  and  prodigious  birth, 
Sick  nature  struggled  :  long  and  strange  her  pangs, 
Her  groans  were  horrible ; — but  O,  most  fair 
The  twins  she  bore,  Equality  and  Peace. 


—  Terrible  and  loud 
As  the  strong  voice  that  from  the  thunder-cloud 
Speaks  to  the  startled  midnight. 


Such  fierce  vivacity  as  fires  the  eye 
Of  genius  fancy-craz'd. 

The  mild  despairing  of  a  heart  resign 'd. 


FOR  THE  HYMN  ON  THE  SUN. 

—  The  sun  (for  now  his  orb 
'Gan  slowly  sink) — 

Shot  half  his  rays  aslant  the  heath,  whose  flow'rs 
Purpled  the  mountain's  broad  and  level  top. 
Rich  was  his  bed  of  clouds,  and  wide  beneath 
Expecting  ocean  smil'd  with  dimpled  face. 


POETICAL  FRAGMENTS.  279 


FOR  THE  HYMN  ON  THE  MOON. 

In  a  cave  in  the  mountains  of  Cashmeer  there  is  an 
image  of  ice,  which  makes  its  appearance  thus:  Two 
days  before  the  new  moon  there  appears  a  bubble  of  ice, 
which  increases  in  size  every  day  till  the  fifteenth,  by 
which  time  it  is  an  ell  or  more  in  height ; — then  as  the 
moon  wanes,  the  image  decreases  till  it  vanishes  away. 


In  darkness  I  remain'd ; — the  neighb'ring  clock 
Told  me  that  now  the  rising  sun  at  dawn 
Shone  lovely  on  my  garden. 


These  be  staggerers  that,  made  drunk  by  power, 
Forget  thirst's  eager  promise,  and  presume. 
Dark  dreamers  !  that  the  world  forgets  it  too  ! 


—  Perish  warmth, 
Unfaithful  to  its  seeming  ! 
Old  age, '  the  shape  and  messenger  of  death,' 
His  wither'd  fist  still  knocking  at  death's  door. 


—  God  no  distance  knows 
All  of  the  whole  possessing. 


With  skill  that  never  alchemist  yet  told. 
Made  drossy  lead  as  ductile  as  pure  gold. 

Guess  at  the  wound  and  heal  with  secret  hand. 


280  POETICAL   FRAGMENTS. 


The  broad-breasted  rock. 
Glasses  his  rugged  forehead  in  the  sea. 


I  mix  in  hfe,  and  labour  to  seem  free, 
With  common  persons  pleas 'd  and  common  things, 
While  every  thought  and  action  tends  to  thee, 
And  every  impulse  from  thy  influence  springs. 


FAREWELL  TO  LOVE. 

*  Farewell,  sweet  Love  !   yet  blame  you  not  my  truth  ; 

More  fondly  ne'er  did  mother  eye  her  child 

Than  I  your  form  :  your's  were  my  hopes  of  youth. 

And  as  you  shaped  my  thoughts,  I  sigh'd  or  smil'd. 

While  most  were  wooing  wealth,  or  gaily  swerving 

To  pleasure's  secret  haunt,  and  some  apart 

Stood  strong  in  pride,  self-conscious  of  deserving. 

To  you  I  gave  my  whole  weak  wishing  heart ; 

And  when  I  met  the  maid  that  realized 

Your  fair  creations,  and  had  won  her  kindness. 

Say  but  for  her  if  aught  on  earth  I  prized  ! 

Your  dreams  alone  I  dreamt  and  caught  your  blindness. 

O  grief! — but  farewell,  Love  !   I  will  go  play  me 

With  thoughts  that  please  me  less,  and  less  betray  me. 


*  Within  these  circling  hollies,  woodbine-clad — 

Beneath  this  small  blue  roof  of  vernal  sky — 

How  warm,  how  still !  Tho'  tears  should  dim  mine  eye, 

Yet  will  my  heart  for  days  continue  glad. 

For  here,  my  love,  thou  art,  and  here  am  I ! 


rOETICAL  FRAGMENTS.  281 


*  Each  crime  that  once  estrang-es  from  the  virtues 
Doth  make  the  memory  of  their  features  daily 
More  dim  and  vague,  till  each  coarse  counterfeit 
Can  have  the  passport  to  our  confidence 
Sign'd  by  ourselves.     And  fitly  are  they  punish'd, 
Who  prize  and  seek  the  honest  man  but  as 
A  safer  lock  to  guard  dishonest  treasures. 


Grant  me  a  patron,  gracious  Heaven  !  whene'er 

My  unwash'd  follies  call  for  penance  drear : 

But  when  more  hideous  guilt  this  heart  infects, 

Instead  of  fiery  coals  upon  my  pate, 

O  let  a  titled  patron  be  my  fate ; — 

That  fierce  compendium  of  Egyptian  pests  ! 

Right  reverend  dean,  right  honourable  squire. 

Lord,  marquis,  earl,  duke,  prince, — or  if  aught  higher, 

However  proudly  nicknamed,  he  shall  be 

Anathema  Maranatha  to  me  ! 


A  SOBER  STATEMENT  OF  HUMAN  LIFE, 

OR  THE  TRUE  MEDIUM. 

*A  chance  may  win  what  by  mischance  was  lost; 
The  net  that  holds  not  great,  takes  little  fish  : 
In  somethings  all,  in  all  things  none  are  crost; 
Few  all  they  need,  but  none  have  all  they  wish : 
Unmingled  joys  to  no  one  here  befall; 
Who  least,  hath  some ;  who  most,  hath  never  all  ! 


OMNIANA.     1812. 


THE  FRENCH  DECADE. 

I  HAVE  nothing  to  say  in  defence  of  the  French 
revolutionists,  as  far  as  they  are  personally 
concerned  in  this  substitution  of  every  tenth 
for  the  seventh  day  as  a  day  of  rest.  It  was 
not  only  a  senseless  outrage  on  an  ancient  ob- 
servance, around  which  a  thousand  good  and 
gentle  feelings  had  clustered  ;  it  not  only  ten- 
ded to  weaken  the  bond  of  brotherhood  be- 
tween France  and  the  other  members  of  Chris- 
tendom ;  but  it  was  dishonest,  and  robbed  the 
labourer  of  fifteen  days  of  restorative  and 
humanizing  repose  in  every  year,  and  ex- 
tended the  wrong  to  all  the  friends  and  fellow 
labourers  of  man  in  the  brute  creation.  Yet 
when  I  hear  Protestants,  and  even  those  of 
the  Lutheran  persuasion,  and  members  of  the 
church  of  England,  inveigh  against  this  change 
as  a  blasphemous  contempt  of  the  fourth  com- 
mandment, I  pause,  and  before  I  can  assent  to 
the  verdict  of  condemnation,  I  must  prepare 
my  mind  to  include  in  the  same  sentence,  at 
least  as  far  as  theory  goes,  the  names  of  se- 
veral among   the  most  revered  reformers   of 


OMNIANA.  283 

t 

Christianity.  Without  referring  to  Luther,  I 
will  begin  with  Master  Frith,  a  founder  and 
martyr  of  the  church  of  England,  having  wit- 
nessed his  faith  amid  the  flames  in  the  year 
1533.  This  meek  and  enlightened,  no  less 
than  zealous  and  orthodox,  divine,  in  his  "  De- 
claration of  Baptism"  thus  expresses  himself; 

Our  forefathers,  which  were  in  the  beginning  of  the 
Church,  did  abrogate  the  sabbath,  to  the  intent  that  men 
might  have  an  example  of  Christian  Hberty.  Howbeit,  be- 
cause it  was  necessary  that  a  day  should  be  reserved  in  which 
the  people  should  come  together  to  hear  the  word  of  God, 
they  ordained  instead  of  the  Sabbath,  which  was  Saturday, 
the  next  following  which  is  Sunday.  And  although  they 
might  have  kept  the  Saturday  with  the  Jew  as  a  thing  indif- 
ferent, yet  they  did  much  better. 

Some  three  years  after  the  martyrdom  of 
Frith,  in  1536,  being  the  27th  of  Henry  VIII. 
suffered  Master  Tindal  in  the  same  glorious 
cause,  and  this  illustrious  martyr  and  translator 
of  the  word  of  life,  likewise,  in  his  "  Answer 
to  Sir  Thomas  More,"  hath  similarly  resolved 
this  point : 

As  for  the  Sabbath,  we  be  lords  of  the  Sabbath,  and  may 
yet  change  it  into  Monday,  or  any  other  day,  as  we  see  need  ; 
or  we  may  make  every  tenth  day  holy  day  only,  if  we  see 
cause  why.  Neither  was  there  any  cause  to  change  it  from 
the  Saturday,  save  only  to  put  a  difference  between  us  and 
the  Jews;  neither  need  we  any  holy  day  at  all,  if  the  people 
might  be  taught  without  it. 

This  great  man  believed  that  if  Christian 
nations  should  ever  become  Christians  indeed, 
there  would  every  day  be  so  many  hours 
taken  from  the  labour  for  the  perishable  body, 


284  OMNIANA. 

to  the  service  of  the  souls  and  the  understand- 
ings of  mankind,  both  masters  and  servants,  as 
to  supersede  the  necessity  of  a  particular  day. 
At  present  our  Sunday  may  be  considered  as 
so  much  Holy  Land,  rescued  from  the  sea  of 
oppression  and  vain  luxury,  and  embanked 
against  the  fury  of  their  billows. 


RIDE  AND  TIE. 

"  On  a  scheme  of  perfect  retribution  in  the 
moral  world"— observed  Empeiristes,and  paused 
to  look  at,  and  wipe  his  spectacles. 

"  Frogs,"  interposed  Musaello,  "  must  have 
been  experimental  philosophers,  and  experi- 
mental philosophers  must  all  transmigrate  into 
frogs." 

*'  The  scheme  will  not  be  yet  perfect,"  ad- 
ded Gelon,  "  unless  our  friend  Empeiristes,  is 
specially  privileged  to  become  an  elect  frog- 
twenty  times  successively,  before  he  reascends 
into  a  galvanic  philosopher." 

"  Well,  well,"  replied  Empeiristes,  with  a 
benignant  smile,  "  I  give  my  consent,  if  only 
our  little  Mary's  fits  do  not  recur." 

Little  Mary  was  Gel  on 's  only  child,  and  the 
darling  and  god-daughter  of  Empeiristes.  By 
the  application  of  galvanic  influence  Empei- 
ristes had  removed  a  nervous  affection  of  her 
right  leg,  accompanied  with  symptomatic  epi- 
lepsy.    The  tear  started  in  Gelon's  eye,  and 


-OMNIANA.  285 

he  pressed  the  hand  of  his  friend,  while  Musa- 
ello,  half  suppressing,  half  indulging,  a  similar 
sense  of  shame,  sportively  exclaimed,  "  Hang 
it,  Gelon  !  somehow  or  other  these  philosopher 
fellows  always  have  the  better  of  us  wits,  in 
the  long  run  !" 


JEREMY  TAYLOR. 

The  writings  of  Bishop  Jeremy  Taylor  are  a 
perpetual  feast,  to  me.  His  hospitable  board 
groans  under  the  weight  and  multitude  of 
viands.  Yet  I  seldom  rise  from  the  perusal  of 
his  works  without  repeating  or  recollecting  the 
excellent  observation  of  Minucius  Felix. 
Fahulas  et  errores  ah  imperitis  parentibus  disci- 
mns ;  et  quod  est  gravius,  ipsis  stndiis  et  disci- 
plinis  elaboramus. 


CRITICISM. 

Many  of  our  modern  criticisms  on  the  works 
of  our  elder  writers  remind  me  of  the  connois- 
seur, who,  taking  up  a  small  cabinet  picture, 
railed  most  eloquently  at  the  absurd  caprice 
of  the  artist  in  painting  a  horse  sprawling. 
"  Excuse  me.  Sir,"  replied  the  owner  of  the 
piece,  "  you  hold  it  the  wrong  way  :  it  is  a 
horse  galloping." 


286  OMNIANA. 


PUBLIC  INSTRUCTION. 

Our  statesmen,  who  survey  with  jealous  dread 
all  plans  for  the  education  of  the  lower  orders, 
may  be  thought  to  proceed  on  the  system  of 
antagonist  muscles  ;  and  in  the  belief,  that  the 
closer  a  nation  shuts  its  eyes,  the  wider  it  will 
open  its  hands.  Or  do  they  act  on  the  prin- 
ciple, that  the  status  helli  is  the  natural  relation 
between  the  people  and  the  government,  and 
that  it  is  prudent  to  secure  the  result  of  the 
contest  by  gouging  the  adversary  in  the  first 
instance  ?  Alas !  the  policy  of  the  maxim  is 
on  a  level  with  its  honesty.  The  Philistines 
had  put  out  the  eyes  of  Samson,  and  thus,  as 
they  thought,  fitted  him  to  drudge  and  grind 

Among  the  slaves  and  asses,  his  comrades, 
As  good  for  nothing  else,  no  .better  service : — 

But  his  darkness  added  to  his  fury  without 
diminishing  his  strength,  and  the  very  pillars 
of  the  temple  of  oppression — ■ 

With  horrible  convulsion,  to  and  fro, 
He  tugged,  he  shook,  till  down  they  came,  and  drew 
The  whole  roof  after  them  with  burst  of  thunder. 
Upon  the  heads  of  all  who  sat  beneath  ; 
Lords,  ladies,  captains,  counsellors,  and  priests, 
Their  choice  nobility. 

The  error  might  be  less  unpardonable  with 
a  statesman  of  the  continent;— but  with  En- 


OMNIANA.  287 

glishmen,  who  have  Ireland  in  one  direction, 
and  Scotland  in  another;  the  one  in  igno- 
rance, sloth,  and  rebellion,— in  the  other  ge- 
neral information,  industry,  and  loyalty,  verily 
it  is  not  error  merely,  but  infatuation. 


PICTURESQUE  WORDS. 

Who  is  ignorant  of  Homer's  IlTJXtov  hvook^vWovI 
Yet  in  some  Greek  manuscript  hexameters  I 
have  met  with  a  compound  epithet,  which  may 
compare  with  it  for  the  prize  of  excellence  in 
flashing  on  the  mental  eye  a  complete  image. 
It  is  an  epithet  of  the  brutified  archangel,  and 
forms  the  latter  half  of  the  verse,^ — 

KfjJ/co/cepwviiva  2aTav. 

Ye  youthful  bards !  compare  this  word  with 
its  literal  translation,  "  tail-horn-hoofed  Satan," 
and  be  shy  of  compound  epithets,  the  compo- 
nents of  which  are  indebted  for  their  union 
exclusively  to  the  printer's  hyphen.  Henry 
More,  indeed,  would  have  naturalized  the  word 
without  hesitation,  and  cercoceronychous  would 
have  shared  the  astonishment  of  the  English 
reader  in  the  glossary  to  his  Song  of  the  Soul 
with  Achronycul,  Anaisthsesie,  &c.  &c. 


288  OMNIANA. 


TOLERATION. 

The  state,  with  respect  to  the  different  sects  of 
religion  under  its  protection,  should  resemble 
a  well  drawn  portrait.  Let  there  be  half  a 
score  individuals  looking  at  it,  every  one  sees 
its  eyes  and  its  benignant  smile  directed  to- 
wards himself. 

The  framer  of  preventive  laws,  no  less  than 
private  tutors  and  school-masters,  should  re- 
member, that  the  readiest  way  to  make  either 
mind  or  body  grow  awry,  is  by  lacing  it  too 
tight. 

WAR. 

It  would  have  proved  a  striking  part  of  a  vision 
presented  to  Adam  the  day  after  the  death  of 
Abel,  to  have  brought  before  his  eyes  half  a 
million  of  men  crowded  together  in  the  space 
of  a  square  mile.  When  the  first  father  had 
exhausted  his  wonder  on  the  multitude  of  his 
offspring,  he  would  then  naturally  inquire  of 
his  angelic  instructor,  for  what  purposes  so 
vast  a  multitude  had  assembled  ?  what  is  the 
common  end  ?  Alas !  to  murder  each  other, — 
all  Cains,  and  yet  no  Abels ! 


OMNIANA.  289 


PARODIES. 

Parodies  on  new  poems  are  read  as  satires ; 
on  old  ones, — the  soliloquy  of  Hamlet  for  in- 
stance— as  compliments.  A  man  of  genius 
may  securely  laugh  at  a  mode  of  attack  by 
which  his  reviler,  in  half  a  century  or  less,  be- 
comes his  encomiast. 


M.  DUPUIS. 


Among  the  extravagancies  of  faith  which  have 
characterized  many  infidel  writers,  who  would 
swallow  a  whale  to  avoid  believing  that  a 
whale  swallowed  Jonas, — a  high  rank  should  be 
given  to  Dupuis,  who,  at  the  commencement  of 
the  French  Revolution,  published  a  work  in 
twelve  volumes,  octavo,  in  order  to  prove  that 
Jesus  Christ  was  the  sun,  and  all  Christians, 
worshippers  of  Mithra.  His  arguments,  if  ar- 
guments they  can  be  called,  consist  chiefly  of 
metaphors  quoted  from  the  Fathers.  What 
irresistible  conviction  would  not  the  following 
passage  from  South's  sermons  (vol.  v.  p.  165.) 
have  flashed  on  his  fancy,  had  it  occurred  in 
the  writings  of  Origen  or  Tertullian !  and  how 
complete  a  confutation  of  all  his  grounds  does 
not  the  passage  afford  to  those  humble  souls, 
who,  gifted  with  common  sense  alone,  can  boast 

VOL.  I.  u 


290  OIMNIANA. 

of  no  additional  light  received  through  a  crack 
in  their  upper  apartments  : — 

Christ  the  great  sun  of  righteousness  and  saviour  of  the 
world,  having  by  a  glorious  rising,  after  a  red  and  I)loody  set- 
ting, proclaimed  his  deity  to  men  and  angels ;  and  by  a  com- 
plete triumph  over  the  two  grand  enemies  of  mankind,  sin 
and  death,  set  up  the  everlasting  gospel  in  the  room  of  all 
false  religions,  has  now  changed  the  Persian  superstition  into 
the  Christian  doctrine,  and  without  the  least  approach  to  the 
idolatry  of  the  former,  made  it  henceforward  the  duty  of  all 
nations,  Jews  and  Gentiles,  to  worship  the  rising  sun. 

This  one  passage  outblazes  the  whole  host 
of  Diipuis'  evidences  and  extracts.  In  the 
same  sermon,  the  reader  will  meet  with  Hume's 
argument  against  miracles  anticipated,  and  put 
in  Thomas's  mouth. 


ORIGIN  OF  THE  WORSHIP  OF  HYMEN. 

The  origin  of  the  worship  of  Hymen  is  thus 
related  by  Lactantius.  The  story  would  fur- 
nish matter  for  an  excellent  pantomime.  Hy- 
men was  a  beautiful  youth  of  Athens,  who  for 
the  love  of  a  young  v' '"gin  disguised  himself,  and 
assisted  at  the  Eleusinian  rites :  and  at  this 
time  he,  together  with  his  beloved,  and  divers 
other  young  ladies  of  that  city,  was  surprized 
and  carried  off  by  pirates,  who  supposing  him 
to  be  what  he  appeared,  lodged  him  with  his 
mistress.  In  the  dead  of  the  night  when  the 
robbers  were  all  asleep,  he  arose  and  cut  their 
throats.     Thence  making  hasty  way  back  to' 


OMNIANA.  291 

Athens,  he  bargained  with  the  parents  that  he 
would  restore  to  them  their  daughter  and  all  her 
companions,  if  they  would  consent  to  her  mar- 
riage with  him.  They  did  so,  and  this  mar- 
riage proving  remarkably  happy,  it  became 
the  custom  to  invoke  the  name  of  Hymen  at 
all  nuptials. 


EGOTISM. 

It  is  hard  and  uncandid  to  censure  the  great 
reformers  in  philosophy  and  religion  for  their 
egotism  and  boastfulness.  It  is  scarcely  pos- 
sible for  a  man  to  meet  with  continued  personal 
abuse,  on  account  of  his  superior  talents,  with- 
out associating  more  and  more  the  sense  of  the 
value  of  his  discoveries  or  detections  with  his 
own  person.  The  necessity  of  repelling  imjust 
contempt,  forces  the  most  modest  man  into  a 
feeling  of  pride  and  self-consciousness.  How 
can  a  tall  man  help  thinking  of  his  size,  when 
dwarfs  are  constantly  on  tiptoe  beside  him  ? — 
Paracelsus  was  a  braggart  and  a  quack ;  so 
was  Cardan  ;  but  it  was  their  merits,  and  not 
their  follies,  which  drew  upon  them  that  tor- 
rent of  detraction  and  calumny,  which  com- 
pelled them  so  frequently  to  think  and  write 
concerning  themselves,  that  at  length  it  became 
a  habit  to  do  so.  Wolff  too,  though  not  a 
boaster,  was  yet  persecuted  into  a  habit  of 
egotism  botli  in  his  prefaces  and  in  his  ordi- 


292  OMNI  AN  A. 

nary  conversation ,  and  the  same  holds  good 
of  the  founder  of  the  Brunonian  system,  and 
of  his  great  namesake  Giordano  Bruno.  The 
more  decorous  manners  of  the  present  age  have 
attached  a  disproportionate  opprobrium  to  this 
foible,  and  many  therefore  abstain  with  cau- 
tious prudence  from  all  displays  of  what  they 
feel.  Nay,  some  do  actually  flatter  themselves, 
that  they  abhor  all  egotism,  and  never  betray 
it  either  in  their  writings  or  discourse.  But 
watch  these  men  narrowly  ;  and  in  the  greater 
number  of  cases  you  will  find  their  thoughts, 
feelings,  and  mode  of  expression,  saturated 
with  the  passion  of  contempt,  which  is  the  con- 
centrated vinegar  of  egotism. 

Your  very  humble  men  in  company,  if  they 
produce  any  thing,  are  in  that  thing  of  the 
most  exquisite  irritability  and  vanity. 

When  a  man  is  attempting  to  describe  ano- 
ther person's  character,  he  may  be  right  or  he 
may  be  wrong ;  but  in  one  thing  he  Avill  always 
succeed,  that  is,  in  describing  himself.  If,  for 
example,  he  expresses  simple  approbation,  he 
praises  from  a  consciousness  of  possessing  si- 
milar qualities  ; — if  he  approves  with  admira- 
tion, it  is  from  a  consciousness  of  deficiency. 
A.  "  Ay  !  he  is  a  sober  man."  B.  "  Ah  !  Sir, 
what  a  blessing  is  sobriety!"  Here  A.  is  a 
man  conscious  of  sobriety,  who  egotizes  in 
tuism  ;— B.  is  one  who,  feeling  the  ill  effects  of 
a  contrary  habit,  contemplates  sobriety  with 
blameless  envy.     Again  : — A.  "  Yes,  he  is  a 


OMNIANA.  293 

warm  man,  a  moneyed  fellow ;  you  may  rely 
upon  him."  B.  "  Yes,  yes,  Sir,  no  wonder ! 
he  has  the  blessing  of  being  well  in  the  world." 
This  reflection  might  be  introduced  in  defence 
of  plaintive  egotism,  and  by  way  of  preface  to 
an  examination  of  all  the  charges  against  it, 
and  from  what  feelings  they  proceed.     1800 


* 


Contempt  is  egotism  in  ill  humonr.  Appe- 
tite without  moral  affection,  social  sympathy, 
and  even  without  passion  and  imagination — 
(in  plain  English,  mere  lust,) — is  the  basest 
form  of  egotism, — and  being  infra  human,  or 
below  humanity,  should  be  pronounced  with 
the  harsh  breathing,  as  he-goat-ism.     1820. 


CAP  OF  LIBERTY. 

TtTosE  who  hoped  proudly  of  human  nature, 
and  admitted  no  distinction  between  Chris- 
tians and  Frenchmen,  regarded  the  first  con- 
stitution as  a  colossal  statue  of  Corinthian  brass, 
formed  by  the  fusion  and  commixture  of  all 
metals  in  the  conflagration  of  the  state.  But 
there  is  a  common  fungus,  which  so  exactly 
represents  the  pole  and  cap  of  liberty,  that  it 
seems  offered  by  nature  herself  as  the  appro- 
priate emblem  of  Gallic  republicanism, — mush- 
room patriots,  with  a  mushroom  cap  of  liberty. 

*  From  Mr.  Gutch's  comniotiplace  book.     Ed. 


294  OMNIANA. 


BULLS. 

Novi  ego  aliquem  qui  dormitabundus  aliquando 
pulsari  horam  quartam  midiverit,  et  sic  numera- 
vit,  una,  una,  una,  una;  ac  turn  prce  rei  ahsur- 
ditate,quam  anima  concipiehat,  exclamavit.  Nee! 
delirat  horologium!  Quater  pulsavit  horam 
unayn. 

I  knew  a  person,  who,  during  imperfect  sleep, 
or  dozing,  as  we  say,  listened  to  the  clock 
as  it  was  striking  four,  and  as  it  struck,  he 
counted  the  four,  one,  one,  one,  one ;  and 
then  exclaimed,  "  Why,  the  clock  is  out  of  its 
wits ;  it  has  struck  one  four  times  over  !" 

This  is  a  good  exemplification  of  the  nature 
of  Sulls,  which  will  be  found  always  to  contain 
in  them  a  confusion  of  what  the  schoolmen 
would  have  called — objectivity  with  subjec- 
tivity ; — in  plain  English,  the  impression  of  a 
thing  as  it  exists  in  itself,  and  extrinsically, 
with  the  image  which  the  mind  abstracts  from 
the  impression.  Thus,  number,  or  the  total  of 
a  series,  is  a  generalization  of  the  mind,  an 
ens  rationis  not  an  ens  reale.  I  have  read  many 
attempts  at  a  definition  of  a  JBidl,  and  lately 
in  the  Edinburgh  Review ;  but  it  then  ap- 
peared to  me  that  the  definers  had  fallen  into 
the  same  fault  with  Miss  Edgeworth,  in  her 
delightful  essay  on  Bulls,  and  given  the  defi- 
nition of  the  genus.  Blunder,  for  that  of  the 


OMNIANA.  295 

particular  species.  I  will  venture,  therefore, 
to  propose  the  following :  a  Bull  consists  in  a 
mental  juxta-position  of  incongruous  images 
or  thoughts  with  the  sensation,  but  without  the 
sense,  of  connection.  The  psychological  con- 
ditions of  the  possibility  of  a  Bull,  it  would  not 
be  difficvdt  to  determine ;  but  it  would  require 
a  larger  space  than  can  be  afforded  here,  at 
least  more  attention  than  my  readers  would  be 
likely  to  afford. 

There  is  a  sort  of  spurious  Bull  which  con- 
sists wholly  in  mistake  of  language,  and  which 
the  closest  thinker  may  make,  if  speaking  in  a 
language  of  which  he  is  not  master. 


WISE  IGNORANCE. 

It  is  impossible  to  become  either  an  eminently 
great,  or  truly  pious  man,  without  the  courage 
to  remain  ignorant  of  many  things.  This  im- 
portant truth  is  most  happily  expressed  by  the 
elder  Scaliger  in  prose,  and  by  the  younger  in 
verse ;  the  latter  extract  has  an  additional 
claim  from  the  exquisite  terseness  of  its  diction, 
and  the  purity  of  its  Latinity.  I  particularly 
recommend  its  perusal  to  the  commentators  on 
the  Apocalypse. 

Quare  ulterior  disquisitio  morosi  atque  sata- 
gentis  animi  est ;  humancE  etiim  sapientice  jjars 
est,  qu<jedam  aquo  animo  nesclre  velle. 

J.  C.  Scalig.     Ex.  307.  s.  29. 


296  OMNIANA. 

Ne  curiosus  queer e  causas  ojnnium, 
QucECunque  lihris  vis  prophetarum  irididit, 
Afflata  ccelo,  plena  veraci  Deo  ; 
Ncc  operta  sacri  snpparo  silenfii 
Irrumperc  audc  ;  sed  prudenter  prceteri  ! 
Ncscire  velle  quce  magister  optimus 
Docere  non  vult,  erudita  inscitia  est. 

Josep.  Scalig. 


ROUGE. 

Triumphant  generals  in  Rome  wore  rouge. 
The  ladies  of  France,  and  their  fair  sisters  and 
imitators  in  Britain,  conceive  themselves  al- 
ways in  the  chair  of  triumph,  and  of  course 
entitled  to  the  same  distinction.  The  custom 
originated,  perhaps,  in  the  humility  of  the  con- 
querors, that  they  might  seem  to  blush  conti- 
nually at  their  own  praises.  Mr.  Gilpin  fre- 
quently speaks  of  a  "  picturesque  eye :"  with 
something  less  of  solecism,  I  may  affirm  that 
our  fair  ever  blushing  triumphants  have  se- 
cured to  themselves  the  charm  of  picturesque 
cheeks,  every  face  being  its  own  portrait. 


"ETTEa  Trrepdeyra.      HASTY   WORDS. 

I  CRAVE  mercy  (at  least  of  my  contemporaries : 
for  if  these  Omniana  should  outlive  the  present 
generation,  the  opinion  will  not  need  it)  but  I 
could  not  help  writing  in  the  blank  page  of  a 


OMNIANA.  297 

very  celebrated  work*  the  following  passage 
from  Picus  Mirandula  :— 

Movent  mihi  stomachum  grammatlstcB  quidam,  qui  cum 
duas  tenuerint  vocahulorum  origines,  ita  seostentant,  ita  ven- 
ditant,  ita  circumferunt  jactabundi,  tit  prce  ipsis  pro  nihilo 
habendos  jjhilosophos  arbitrentur.     Epist.  ad  Hcrniol.  Barb. 


MOTIVES  AND  IMPULSES. 

It  is  a  matter  of  infinite  difficulty,  but  fortu- 
nately of  comparative  indifference  to  determine 
what  a  man's  motive  may  have  been  for  this 
or  that  particular  action.  Rather  seek  to  learn 
what  his  objects  in  general  are.  What  does 
he  habitually  wish,  habitually  pursue?  and 
thence  deduce  his  impulses  which  are  com- 
monly the  true  efficient  causes  of  men's  con- 
duct ;  and  without  which  the  motive  itself 
would  not  have  become  a  motive.  Let  a 
haunch  of  venison  represent  the  motive,  and 
the  keen  appetite  of  health,  and  exercise  the 
impulse :  then  place  the  same  or  some  more 
favourite  dish  before  the  same  man,  sick,  dys- 
peptic, and  stomach-worn,  and  we  may  then 
weigh  the  comparative  influences  of  motives 
and  impulses.  Without  the  perception  of 
this  truth,  it  is  impossible  to  understand  the 
character  of  lago,  who  is  represented  as  now 
assigning  one,  and  then  another,  and  again  a 

*  Diversions  of  Piirley.     Ed. 


298  OMNIANA. 

third  motive  for  his  conduct,  all  alike  the  mere 
fictions  of  his  own  restless  natm'e,  distempered 
by  a  keen  sense  of  his  intellectual  superiority, 
and  haunted  by  the  love  of  exerting  power  on 
those  especially  who  are  his  superiors  in  prac- 
tical and  moral  excellence.  Yet  how  many 
among  our  modern  critics  have  attributed  to 
the  profound  author  this  the  appropriate  in- 
consistency of  the  character  itself 

A  second  illustration : — Did  Curio,  the  quon- 
dam patriot,  reformer,  and  semi-revolutionist, 
abjure  his  opinion,  and  yell  the  foremost  in 
the  hunt  of  persecution  against  his  old  friends 
and  fellow-philosophists,  with  a  cold  clear  pre- 
determination, formed  at  one  moment,  of  mak- 
ing £5000  a  year  by  his  apostacy  ? — I  neither 
know  nor  care.  Probably  not.  But  this  I 
know,  that  to  be  thought  a  man  of  consequence 
by  his  contemporaries,  to  be  admitted  into  the 
society  of  his  superiors  in  artificial  rank,  to 
excite  the  admiration  of  lords,  to  live  in  splen- 
dour and  sensual  luxury,  have  been  the  objects 
of  his  habitual  wishes.  A  flash  of  lightning 
has  turned  at  once  the  polarity  of  the  compass 
needle  :  and  so,  perhaps,  now  and  then,  but  as 
rarely,  a  violent  motive  may  revolutionize  a 
man's  opinions  and  professions.  But  more 
frequently  his  honesty  dies  away  imperceptibly 
from  evening  into  twilight,  and  from  twilight 
into  utter  darkness.  He  turns  hypocrite  so 
gradually,  and  by  such  tiny  atoms  of  motion, 
that  by  the  time  he  has  arrived  at  a  given  point, 


OMNIANA.  299 

he  forgets  his  own  hypocrisy  in  tlie  impercep- 
tible degrees  of  his  conversion.  The  difference 
between  such  a  man  and  a  bolder  bar,  is 
merely  that  between  the  hour  hand,  and  that 
which  tells  the  seconds,  on  a  watch.  Of  the 
former  you  can  see  only  the  past  motion ;  of 
the  latter  both  the  past  motion  and  the  present 
moving.  Yet  there  is,  perhaps,  more  hope  of 
the  latter  rogue :  for  he  has  lied  to  mankind 
only  and  not  to  himself — the  former  lies  to  his 
own  heart,  as  well  as  to  the  public. 


INWARD  BLINDNESS. 

Talk  to  a  blind  man — he  knows  he  wants  the 
sense  of  sight,  and  willingly  makes  the  proper 
allowances.  But  there  are  certain  internal 
senses,  which  a  man  may  want,  and  yet  be 
wholly  ignorant  that  he  wants  them.  It  is 
most  unpleasant  to  converse  with  such  persons 
on  subjects  of  taste,  philosophy,  or  religion. 
Of  course  there  is  no  reasoning  with  them  :  for 
they  do  not  possess  the  facts,  on  which  the 
reasoning  must  be  grounded.  Nothing  is  pos- 
sible, but  a  naked  dissent,  which  implies  a  sort 
of  unsocial  contempt ;  or,  what  a  man  of  kind 
dispositions  is  very  likely  to  fall  into,  a  heart- 
less tacit  acquiescence,  which  borders  too 
nearly  on  duplicity. 


300  OMNIANA. 


THE  VICES  OF  SLAVES  NO  EXCUSE  FOR 
SLAVERY. 

It  often  happens,  that  the  slave  himself  has 
neither  the  power  nor  the  wish  to  be  free. 
He  is  then  brutified  ;  but  this  apathy  is  the 
dire  effect  of  slavery,  and  so  far  from  being  a 
justifying  cause,  that  it  contains  the  grounds  of 
its  bitterest  condemnation.  The  Carlovingian 
race  bred  up  the  Merovingi  as  beasts  ;  and  then 
assigned  their  un worthiness  as  the  satisfactory 
reason  for  their  dethronement.  Alas  !  the  hu- 
man being  is  more  easily  Meaned  from  the 
habit  of  commanding  than  from  that  of  abject* 
obedience.  The  slave  loses  his  soul  when  he 
loses  his  master  ;  even  as  the  dog  that  has  lost 
himself  in  the  street,  howls  and  whines  till  he 
has  found  the  house  again,  where  he  had  been 
kicked  and  cudgelled,  and  half  starved  to 
boot.  As  we,  however,  or  our  ancestors  must 
have  inoculated  our  fellow-creature  with  this 
wasting  disease  of  the  soul,  it  becomes  our  duty 
to  cure  him ;  and  though  we  cannot  immedi- 
ately make  him  free,  yet  we  can,  and  ought 
to,  put  him  in  the  way  of  becoming  so  at  some 
future  time,  if  not  in  his  own  person,  yet  in 
that  of  his  children.  The  French,  you  will  say, 
are  not  capable  of  freedom.  Grant  this  ; — but 
does  this  fact  justify  the  ungrateful  traitor, 
whose  every  measure  has  been  to  make  them 
still  more  incapable  of  it  ? 


OMNI  AN  A. 


301 


CIRCULATION  OF  THE  BLOOD. 

The  ancients  attributed  to  the  blood  the  same 
motion  of  ascent  and  descent  which  really 
takes  place  in  the  sap  of  trees.  Servetus  dis- 
covered the  minor  circulation  from  the  heart 
to  the  lungs.  Do  not  the  following  passages  of 
Giordano  Bnmo  (published  in  1591)  seem  to 
imply  more?  I  put  the  question,  pauperisforma, 
with  unfeigned  diffidence. 

"  De  Immenso  et  Innumerabili"  lib.  vi.  cap.  8. 

Ut  in  nostro  corpore  sanguis  per  totum  circumcursat  et  re- 
^cursat,  sic  in  toto  munclo,  astro,  tellure. 

Quare  non  aliter  quam  nostro  in  corpore  sanguis 
Hinc  meat,  hinc  remeat,  yieque  ad  inferiora  Jluit  vi 
Majors,  ad  supera  a  pedibus  quam  deinde  recedat : — 

and  still  more  plainly,  in  the  ninth  chapter  of 
the  same  book, 

Quid  esset 
Quodam  ni  gyro  nature  cuncta  redirent 
Ortus  ad  proprios  rursum  ;  si  sorheat  omnes 
Pontus  aquas,  totum  non  restituatque  perenni 
Ordine  ;  qua  possit  rerum  consistere  vita  ? 
Tanquam  si  totus  concurrat  sanguis  in  unam. 
In  qua  consistat,  partem,  nee  prima  revisat 
Ordia,  et  antiquos  cursus  non  hide  resumat. 

It  is  affirmed  in  the  "  Supplement  to  the 
Scotch  Encyclopoedia  Britannica,"  that  Des 
Cartes  was  the  first  who  in  defiance  of  Aris- 
totle and  the  Schools,  attributed  infinity  to 


302  OMNIANA. 

the  universe.     The  very  title  of  Bruno's  poem 
proves,  tliat  this  honour  belongs  to  him. 

Feyjoo  lays  claim  to  a  knowledge  of  the 
circulation  of  the  blood  for  Francisco  de  la 
Reyna,  a  farrier,  who  published  a  work  upon  his 
own  art  at  Burgos,  in  1 564.  The  passage  which 
he  quotes  is  perfectly  clear.  Por  manera,  que 
la  sangre  anda  en  tortio,  y  en  rueda  po?-  todos  los 
mietnbros,  excluye  toda  duda.  Whether  Reyna 
himself  claimed  any  discovery,  Feyjoo  does 
not  mention ; — but,  these  words  seem  to  refer 
to  some  preceding  demonstration  of  the  fact. 
I  am  inclined  to  think  that  this,  like  many 
other  things,  was  known  before  it  was  disco- 
vered ;  just  as  the  preventive  powers  of  the 
vaccine  disease,  the  existence  of  adipocire  in 
graves,  and  certain  principles  in  grammar  and 
in  population,  upon  which  bulky  books  have 
been  written  and  great  reputations  raised  in 
our  days. 


PERITUR.E  PARCERE  CHARTS. 

What  scholar  but  must  at  times  have  a  feeling 
of  splenetic  regret,  when  he  looks  at  the  list 
of  novels,  in  two,  three,  or  four  volumes  each, 
published  monthly  by  Messrs.  Lane,  &c.  and 
then  reflects  that  there  are  valuable  works  of 
Cudworth,  prepared  by  himself  for  the  press, 
yet  still  unpublished  by  the  University  which 
possesses  them,  and  which  ought  to  glory  in 


OMNIANA. 


303 


the  name  of  their  great  author !  and  that  there 
is  extant  in  manuscript  a  folio  volume  of  un- 
printed  sermons  by  Jeremy  Taylor.  Surely, 
surely,  the  patronage  of  our  many  literary 
societies  might  be  employed  more  beneficially 
to  the  literature  and  to  the  actual  literati  of 
the  country,  if  they  would  publish  the  valu- 
able manuscripts  that  lurk  in  our  different 
public  libraries,  and  make  it  worth  the  while  of 
men  of  learning  to  correct  and  annotate  the 

copies,  instead  of ,  but  it  is  treading  on 

hot  embers ! 


TO  HAVE  AND  TO  BE. 

The  distinction  is  marked  in  a  beautiful  senti- 
ment of  a  German  poet:  Hast  thou  any  thing? 
share  it  with  me  and  I  will  pay  thee  the 
worth  of  it.  Art  thou  any  thing  ?  O  then  let 
us  exchange  souls ! 

The  following  is  offered  as  a  mere  playful 
illustration : 

"  Women  have  no  souls,"  says  prophet  Ma- 
homet. 

Nay,  dearest  Anna !  why  so  grave  ? 
I  said  you  had  no  soul,  'tis  true  : 
For  what  you  are,  you  cannot  have — 
'Tis  I,  that  have  one,  since  I  first  had  you. 


304  OMNIANA. 


PARTY  PASSION. 

"  Well,  Sir  !'^  exclaimed  a  lady,  the  vehe- 
ment and  impassionate  partizan  of  Mr.  Wilkes, 
in  the  day  of  his  glory,  and  during  the  broad 
blaze  of  his  patriotism,  "  Well,  Sir !  and  will 
you  dare  deny  that  Mr.  Wilkes  is  a  great  man, 
and  an  eloquent  man  ?" — "  Oh  !  by  no  means. 
Madam !  I  have  not  a  doubt  respecting  Mr. 
Wilkes's  talents!"— "Well,  but.  Sir!  and  is 
he  not  a  fine  man,  too,  and  a  handsome  man  ?" 
— "  Why,  Madam  !  he  squints,  doesn't  he?" — 
"  Squints !  yes  to  be  sure  he  does.  Sir !  but 
not  a  bit  more  than  a  gentleman  and  a  man  of 
sense  ought  to  squint !" 


GOODNESS  OF  HEART  INDISPENSABLE  TO 
A  MAN  OF  GENIUS. 

If  men  will  imjmrtially,  and  not  asquint,  look 

toivard  the  offices  and  function  of  a  poet,  they 

ivill  easily  conclude  to  themselves  the  iinpossihility 

of  any  7nans  being  the  good  poet  ivithout  being 

first  a  good  man.     Dedication  to  the  Fox. 

Ben  Jonson  has  borrowed  this  just  and  noble 
sentiment  from  Strabo. 

H  Se  (^dpeTTi)  7roir}TOv  avvet^vKTCU  ry  tov  avOptoirov' 
Kai  ov\  oiovTS  ayaOov  yevtaOcu  7roir)Tr]v,  jin]  irpoTEpov 
yevvOivra  avcpa  ayaOov.       Liib.  1.  p.  3»>.  lOllO. 


OMNIANA.  305 


MILTON  AND  BEN  JONSON. 

Those  who  have  more  faith  in  paralleUsm  than 
myself,  may  trace  Satan's  address  to  the  sun  in 
Paradise  Lost  to  the  first  Unes  of  Ben  Jonson's 
Poetaster : 

"  Light !  I  salute  thee,  but  with  wounded  nerves. 
Wishing  thy  golden  splendour  pitchy  darkness  !" 

But  even  if  Milton  had  the  above  in  his  mind, 
his  own  verses  would  be  more  fitly  entitled  an 
apotheosis  of  Jonson's  lines  than  an  imitation. 


STATISTICS. 

We  all  remember  Burke's  curious  assertion 
that  there  were  80,000  incorrigible  jacobins  in 
England.  Mr.  Colquhoun  is  equally  precise 
in  the  number  of  beggars,  prostitutes,  and 
thieves  in  the  City  of  London.  Mercetinus, 
who  wrote  under  Lewis  XV.  seems  to  have  af- 
forded the  precedent ;  he  assures  his  readers, 
that  by  an  accurate  calculation  there  were 
50,000  incorrigible  atheists  in  the  City  of 
Paris  !  Atheism  then  may  have  been  a  co-cause 
of  the  French  revolution  ;  but  it  should  not  be 
burthened  on  it,  as  its  monster-child. 


VOL.  I.  X 


306  OMNIANA. 


MAGNANIMITY. 

The  following  ode  was  written  by  Giordano 
Bruno,  under  prospect  of  that  martyrdom  which 
he  soon  after  suft'ered  at  Rome,  for  atheism  : 
that  is,  as  is  proved  by  all  his  works,  for  a 
lofty  and  enlightened  piety,  which  was  of 
course  unintelligible  to  bigots  and  dangerous 
to  an  apostate  hierarchy.  If  the  human  mind 
be,  as  it  assuredly  is,  the  sublimest  object  which 
nature  affords  to  our  contemplation,  these  lines 
which  portray  the  human  mind  under  the  ac- 
tion of  its  most  elevated  affections,  have  a  fair 
claim  to  the  praise  of  sublimity.  The  work 
from  which  they  are  extracted  is  exceedingly 
rare  (as  are,  indeed,  all  the  works  of  the  Nolan 
philosopher),  and  I  have  never  seen  them 
quoted : — 

Dcedaleas  vacuis  pliimas  nectere  humeris 
Concupiant  alii;  aut  vi  suspendi  nubium 
Alis,  ventorumve  appelant  remigium ; 
Aut  orbilcE  Jlammanlis  raptari  alveo  ; 
Bellerophontisve  alilem. 

Nos  vero  illo  donali  sumus  genio, 
Ut  falum  inlrepedi  objectasque  umbras  cernimus, 
Ne  ccEci  ad  lumen  solis,  ad  jiersjncuas 
Naturce  voces  surdi,  ad  Divum  munera 
Ingrato  adsimus  pec  fore. 

Non  curamus  stultorum  quid  opinio 

De  nobis  ferat,  aut  queis  dignetur  sedibus. 


OMNIANA.  307 

Alls  ascendimus  sursum  melioribus  ! 
Quid  nubes  ultra,  ventorum  ultra  est  semita. 
Vidimus,  quantum  satis  est. 

Illuc  conscendent  plurimi,  nobis  ducibus, 
Per  scalam  propria  erectam  et  firmam  in  pectore, 
Quam  Deus,  et  vegeti  sors  dabit  ingeni  ; 
Non  manes,  pluma,  ignis,  ventus,  nubes,  spiritus, 
Divinantum  2)hantasmata. 

Non  sensus  vegetans,  non  me  ratio  arguet, 
Non  indoles  exculti  clara  ingenii ; 
Sed  perjidi  sycophants  supercilium 
Absque  lance,  statera,  trutiyia,  oculo, 
Miraculum  armati  segete. 

Versijicantis  grammatistce  eiicomium, 
Buglossce  Grcecissantum,  et  epistolia 
Lectorem  libri  salutantum  a  limine, 
Latrantum  adversum  Zoilos,  Memos,  mastiges, 
Hinc  absint  testimonia  ! 

Procedat  nudus,  quern  non  ornant  nubila, 
Sol !  Non  conveniunt  quadrupedum  phalera 
'Humano  dorso  I  Porro  veri  species 
QucEsita,  inventa,  et  patefacta  me  efferat  ! 

Etsi  nidlus  intelligat, 
Si  cum  natura  sapio,  et  sub  numine. 
Id  vere  plus  quam  satis  est. 

The  conclusion  alludes  to  a  charge  of  impe- 
netrable obscurity,  in  which  Bruno  shares  one 
and  the  same  fate  with  Plato,  Aristotle,  Kant, 
and  in  truth  with  every  great  discoverer  and 
benefactor  of  the  human  race  ;  excepting  only 
when  the  discoveries  have  been  capable  of 
being  rendered  palpable  to  the  outward  senses, 
and  have  therefore  come  under  the  cognizance 


30R  OMNIANA. 

of  our  "sober  judicious  critics,"  the  men  of 
"  sound  common  sense  ;"  that  is,  of  those 
snails  in  intellect,  who  wear  their  eyes  at  the 
tips  of  their  feelers,  and  cannot  even  see  unless 
they  at  the  same  time  touch.  When  these 
finger-philosophers  affirm  that  Plato,  Bruno, 
&c.  must  have  been  "  out  of  their  senses,"  the 
just  and  proper  retort  is, — "  Gentlemen  !  it  is 
still  worse  with  you !  you  have  lost  your  rea- 
son ! 

By  the  by,  Addison  in  the  Spectator  has 
grossly  misrepresented  the  design  and  tendency 
of  Bruno's  Bestia  Triomphante;  the  object  of 
which  was  to  show  of  all  the  theologies  and 
theogonies  which  have  been  conceived  for  the 
mere  purpose  of  solving  problems  in  the  mate- 
rial universe,  that  as  they  originate  in  fancy,  so 
they  all  end  in  delusion,  and  act  to  the  hind- 
rance or  prevention  of  sound  knowledge  and 
actual  discovery.  But  the  principal  and  most 
important  truth  taught  in  this  allegory  is,  that  in 
the  concerns  of  morality  all  pretended  know- 
ledge of  the  will  of  Heaven  which  is  not  re- 
vealed to  marrthrough  his  conscience  ;  that  all 
commands  which  do  not  consist  in  the  uncon- 
ditional obedience  of  the  will  to  the  pure  rea- 
son, without  tampering  with  consequences 
(which  are  in  God's  power,  not  in  ours) ;  in 
short,  that  all  motives  of  hope  and  fear  from 
invisible  powers,  which  are  not  immediately 
derived  from,  and  absolutely  coincident  with, 
the  reverence  due  to  the  supreme  reason  of  the 


OMNIANA.  309 

universe,  are  all  alike  dangerous  superstitions. 
The  worship  founded  on  them,  whether  offered 
by  the  Catholic  to  St.  Francis,  or  by  the  poor 
African  to  his  Fetish  differ  in  form  only,  not 
in  substance.  Herein  Bruno  speaks  not  only 
as  a  philosopher,  but  as  an  enlightened  Chris- 
tian ; — the  Evangelists  and  Apostles  every 
Avhere  representing  their  moral  precepts  not  as 
doctrines  then  first  revealed,  but  as  truths  im- 
planted in  the  hearts  of  men,  whicli  their  vices 
only  could  have  obscured. 


NEGROS  AND  NARCISSUSES. 

There  are  certain  tribes  of  Negros  who  take 
for  the  deity  of  the  day  the  first  thing  they  see 
or  meet  with  in  the  morning.  Many  of  our 
fine  ladies,  and  some  of  our  very  fine  gentle- 
men, are  followers  of  the  same  sect ;  though 
by  aid  of  the  looking-glass  they  secure  a  con- 
stancy as  to  the  object  of  their  devotion. 


AN  ANECDOTE. 

We  here  in  England  received  a  very  high  cha- 
racter of  Lord during  his  stay  abroad. 

"  Not  unlikely,  Sir,"  replied  the  traveller ;  "  a 
dead  dog  at  a  distance  is  said  to  smell  like 
musk." 


oiO  OlMNIANA. 


THE  PHAROS  AT  ALEXANDRIA. 

Certain  full  and  highly-wrought  dissuasivcs 
from  sensual  indulgencies,  in  the  works  of  the- 
ologians as  well  as  of  satirists  and  story-writers, 
may,  not  unaptly,  remind  one  of  the  Pharos ; 
the  many  lights  of  which  appeared  at  a  dis- 
tance as  one,  and  this  as  a  polar  star,  so  as  more 
often  to  occasion  wrecks  than  prevent  them. 

At  the  base  of  the  Pharos  the  name  of  the 
reigning  monarch  was  engraved,  on  a  compo- 
sition, which  the  artist  well  knew  would  last  no 
longer  than  the  king's  life.  Under  this,  and 
cut  deep  in  the  marble  itself,  was  his  own  name 
and  dedication  :  "  Sostratos  of  Gyndos,  son  of 
Dexiteles  to  the  Gods,  protectors  of  sailors  !" — 
So  will  it  be  with  the  Georgimn  Sidus  the  Fer- 
dinancUa,  &c.  &c. — Flattery's  plaister  of  Paris 
will  crumble  away,  and  under  it  we  shall  read 
the  names  of  Herschel,  Piozzi,  and  their  com- 
peers. 


SENSE  AND  COMMON  SENSE. 

I  HAVE  noticed  two  main  evils  in  philosophi- 
zing. The  first  is,  the  absurdity  of  demanding 
proof  for  the  very  facts  which  constitute  the 
nature  of  him  who  demands  it, — a  proof  for 
those  primary   and   unceasing  revelations   of 


OMNIANA.  311 

self-consciousness,  which  every  possible  proof 
must  pre-suppose  ;  reasoning,  for  instance,  joro 
and  con,  concerning  the  existence  of  the  power 
of  reasoning.  Other  truths  may  be  ascer- 
tained ;  but  these  are  certainty  itself  (all  at 
least  which  we  mean  by  the  word),  and  are  the 
measure  of  every  thing  else  which  we  deem 
certain.  The  second  evil  is,  that  of  mistaking 
for  such  facts  mere  general  prejudices,  and 
those  opinions  that,  having  been  habitually 
taken  for  granted,  are  dignified  with  the  name 
of  common  sense.  Of  these,  the  first  is  the 
more  injurious  to  the  reputation,  the  latter  more 
detrimental  to  the  progress  of  philosophy.  In 
the  affairs  of  common  life  we  very  properly 
appeal  to  common  sense ;  but  it  is  absurd  to 
reject  the  results  of  the  microscope  from  the 
negative  testimony  of  the  naked  eye.  Knives 
are  sufficient  for  the  table  and  the  market ; — 
but  for  the  purposes  of  science  we  must  dissect 
with  the  lancet. 

As  an  instance  of  the  latter  evil,  take  that 
truly  powerful  and  active  intellect,  Sir  Thomas 
Brown,  who,  though  he  had  written  a  large 
volume  in  detection  of  vulgar  errors,  yet 
peremptorily  pronounces  the  motion  of  the 
earth  round  the  sun,  and  consequently  the 
whole  of  the  Copernican  system  unworthy  of 
any  serious  confutation,  as  being  manifestly  re- 
pugnant to  common  sense ;  which  said  com- 
mon sense,  like  a  miller's  scales,  used  to  weigh 
gold  or  gasses,  may,  and  often  does,  become 


312  OMNIANA. 

very  gross,  though  unfortunately  not  very  un- 
common, nonsense.  And  as  for  the  former, 
which  may  be  called  Logica  Prcepostera,  I 
have  read  in  metaphysical  essays  of  no  small 
fame,  arguments  drawn  ah  extra  in  proof  and 
disproof  of  personal  identity,  which,  ingenious 
as  they  may  be,  were  clearly  anticipated  by  the 
little  old  woman's  appeal  to  her  little  dog,  for 
the  solution  of  the  very  same  doubts,  occa- 
sioned by  her  petticoats  having  been  cut  round 
about : — 

If  it  is  not  me,  he'll  bark  and  he'll  rail, 
But  if  I  be  I,  he'll  wag  his  little  tail. 


TOLERATION. 

1  DARE  confess  that  Mr.  Locke's  treatise  on 
Toleration  appeared  to  me  far  from  being  a 
full  and  satisfactory  answer  to  the  subtle  and 
oft-times  plausible  arguments  of  Bellarmin, 
and  other  Romanists.  On  the  whole,  I  was 
more  pleased  with  the  celebrated  W.  Penn's 
tracts  on  the  same  subject.  The  following  ex- 
tract from  his  excellent  letter  to  the  king  of 
Poland  appeals  to  the  heart  rather  than  to  the 
head,  to  the  Christian  rather  than  to  the  phi- 
losopher ;  and,  besides,  overlooks  the  ostensible 
object  of  religious  penalties,  which  is  not  so 
much  to  convert  the  heretic,  as  to  prevent  the 
spread  of  heresy.  The  thoughts,  however,  are 
so  just  in  themselves,  and  expressed  with  so 


OMMANA.  313 

much  life  and  simplicity,  that  it  well  deserves  a 
place  in  these  Omniana  :  — 

Now,  O  Prince !  give  a  poor  Christian  leave  to  expostu- 
late with  thee.  Did  Christ  Jesus  or  his  holy  followers  endea- 
vour, by  precept  or  example,  to  set  up  their  religion  with  a 
carnal  sword  ?  Called  he  any  troops  of  men  or  angels  to  defend 
him?  Did  he  encourage  Peter  to  dispute  his  right  with  the 
sword  ?  But  did  he  not  say,  Put  it  up  ?  Or  did  he  countenance 
his  over-zealous  disciples,  when  they  would  have  had  fire  from 
heaven  to  destroy  those  that  were  not  of  their  mind  ?  No  ! 
But  did  not  Christ  rebuke  them,  saying.  Ye  know  not  what 
spirit  ye  are  of?  And  if  it  was  neither  Christ's  spirit,  nor  their 
own  spirit  that  would  have  fire  from  heaven — Oh !  what  is 
that  spirit  that  would  kindle  fire  on  earth  to  destroy  such  as 
peaceably  dissent  upon  the  account  of  conscience  ! 

O  King!  when  did  the  true  religion  persecute?  When 
did  the  true  church  oflTer  violence  for  religion  ?  Were  not  her 
weapons  prayers,  tears,  and  patience  ?  did  not  Jesus  conquer 
by  these  weapons,  and  vanquish  cruelty  by  suffering?  can 
clubs,  and  staves,  and  swords,  and  prisons,  and  banishments 
reach  the  soul,  convert  the  heart,  or  convince  the  understand- 
ins:  of  man  ?  When  did  violence  ever  make  a  true  convert,  or 
bodily  punishment,  a  sincere  Christian?  This  maketh  void 
the  end  of  Christ's  coming.  Yea,  it  robbeth  God's  spirit  of  its 
office,  which  is  to  convince  the  world.  That  is  the  sword  by 
which  the  ancient  Christians  overcame. 

The  theory  of  persecution  seems  to  rest  on 
the  following  assumptions.  1.  A  duty  implies 
a  right.  We  have  a  right  to  do  whatever  it  is 
our  duty  to  do.  2.  It  is  the  duty  and  conse- 
quently the  right  of  the  supreme  power  in  a 
state  to  promote  the  greatest  possible  sum  of 
well-being  in  that  state.  3.  This  is  impossible 
without  morality.  4.  But  morality  can  neither 
be  produced  or  preserved  in  a  people  at  large 
without  true  religion.    5.  Relative  to  the  duties 


314  OMNIANA. 

of  the  legislature  or  governors,  that  is  the  true 
religion  which  they  conscientiously  believe  to 
be  so.  G.  As  there  can  be  but  one  true  reli- 
gion, at  the  same  time,  this  one  it  is  their  duty 
and  right  to  authorize  and  protect.  7.  But  the 
established  religion  cannot  be  protected  and 
secured  except  by  the  imposition  of  restraints 
or  the  influence  of  penalties  on  those,  who  pro- 
fess and  propagate  hostility  to  it.  8.  True  re- 
ligion, consisting  of  precepts,  counsels,  com- 
mandments, doctrines,  and  historical  narra- 
tives, cannot  be  effectually  proved  or  defended,- 
but  by  a  comprehensive  view  of  the  whole  as  a 
system.  Now  this  cannot  be  hoped  for  from 
the  mass  of  mankind.  But  it  may  be  attacked, 
and  the  faith  of  ignorant  men  subverted  by 
particular  objections,  by  the  statement  of  diffi- 
culties without  any  counter-statement  of  the 
greater  difficulties  whicli  would  result  from  the 
rejection  of  the  former,  and  by  all  the  otlier 
stratagems  used  in  the  desultory  warfare  of 
sectaries  and  infidels.  This  is,  however,  mani- 
festly dishonest  and  dangerous,  and  there  must 
exist,  therefore,  a  power  in  the  state  to  prevent, 
suppress,  and  punish  it.  9.  The  advocates  of 
toleration  have  never  been  able  to  agree  among 
themselves  concerning  the  limits  to  their  own 
claims  ;  liave  never  established  any  clear  rules, 
as  to  what  shall  and  what  shall  not  be  admitted 
under  tlie  name  of  religion  and  conscience. 
Treason  and  the  grossest  indecencies  not  only 
may  be,  but  fiave  been,  called  by  tliese  names  : 


OMNIANA.  315 

as  among  the  earlier  Anabaptists.  10.  And 
last,  it  is  a  petitio  piincipii,  or  begging  the 
question,  to  take  for  granted  that  a  state  has 
no  power  except  in  case  of  overt  acts.  It  is  its 
duty  to  prevent  a  present  evil,  as  much  at  least 
as  to  punish  the  perpetrators  of  it.  Besides, 
preaching  and  publishing  are  overt  acts.  Nor 
has  it  yet  been  proved,  though  often  asserted, 
that  a  Christian  sovereign  has  nothing  to  do 
with  the  eternal  happiness  or  misery  of  the 
fellow  creatures  entrusted  to  his  charge. 


HINT  FOR  A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  HISTORY. 

"  The  very  knowledge  of  the  opinions  and  customs  of  so 
considerable  a  part  of  mankind  as  the  Jews  now  are,  and 
especially  have  been  heretofore,  is  valuable  both  for  pleasure 
and  use.  It  is  a  very  good  piece  of  history,  and  that  of  the 
best  kind,  namely,  of  human  nature,  and  of  that  part  of  it 
whi'ch  is  most  different  from  us,  and  commonly  the  least  known 
to  us.  And,  indeed,  the  principal  advantage  which  is  to  be 
made  by  the  wiser  sort  of  men  of  most  writings,  is  rather  to 
see  what  men  think  and  are,  than  to  be  informed  of  the  na- 
tures and  truth  of  things;  to  observe  what  thoughts  and  pas- 
sions have  occupied  men's  minds,  what  opinions  and  manners 
they  are  of.  In  this  view  it  becomes  of  no  mean  importance 
to  notice  and  record  the  strangest  ignorance,  the  most  putid 
fables,  impertinent,  trilling,  ridiculous  disputes,  and  more  ridi- 
culous pugnacity  in  the  defence  and  retention  of  the  subjects 
disputed."  Publisher's  preface  to  the  reader  in  Lightfoot's 
Works,  vol.  i. 

I\  the  thick  volume  of  title  pages  and  chapters 
of  contents    (composed)    of  large   and    small 


310  OMNI  ANA. 

works  correspondent  to  each  (proposed)  by  a 
certain  owjw/-pregnant,  7ti  hi  I  i-pnitwricnt  genius 
of  my  acquaintance,  not  the  least  promising  is, 
— "  A  History  of  the  morals  and  (as  connected 
therewith)  of  the  manners  of  the  English  Na- 
tion from  the  Conquest  to  the  present  time." 
From  the  chapter  of  contents  it  appears,  that 
my  friend  is  a  steady  believer  in  the  uninter- 
rupted progression  of  his  fellow  countrymen  ; 
that  there  has  been  a  constant  growth  of  wealth 
and  well-being  among  us,  and  with  these  an 
increase  of  knowledge,  and  with  increasing 
knowledge  an  increase  and  diffusion  of  prac- 
tical goodness.  The  degrees  of  acceleration, 
indeed,  have  been  different  at  different  periods. 
The  moral  being  has  sometimes  crawled,  some- 
times strolled,  sometimes  walked,  sometimes 
run ;  but  it  has  at  all  times  been  moving  on- 
ward. If  in  any  one  point  it  has  gone  back- 
ward, it  has  been  only  in  order  to  leap  forward 
in  some  other.  The  work  was  to  commence 
with  a  numeration  table,  or  catalogue,  of  those 
virtues  or  qualities  which  make  a  man  happy 
in  himself,  and  which  conduce  to  the  happiness 
of  those  about  him,  in  a  greater  or  lesser  sphere 
of  agency.  The  degree  and  the  frequency  in 
which  each  of  these  virtues  manifested  them- 
selves, in  the  successive  reigns  from  William 
the  Conqueror  inclusively,  were  to  be  illustrated 
by  apposite  quotations  from  the  works  of  con- 
temporary writers,  not  only  of  historians  and 
chroniclers,  but  of  the  poets,  romance  writers, 


OMNIANA.  317 

and  theologians,  not  omitting  the  correspon- 
dence between  literary  men,  the  laws  and 
regulations,  civil  and  ecclesiastical,  and  what- 
ever records  the  industry  of  antiquarians  has 
brought  to  light  in  their  provincial,  municipal, 
and  monastic  histories  : — tall  tomes  and  huge  ! 
undegenerate  sons  of  Anak,  which  look  down 
from  a  dizzy  height  on  the  dwarfish  progeny  of 
contemporary  wit,  and  can  find  no  associates  in 
size  at  a  less  distance  than  two  centuries ;  and 
in  arranging  which  the  puzzled  librarian  must 
commit  an  anachronism  in  order  to  avoid  an 
anatopism. 

Such  of  these  illustrations  as  most  amused  or 
impressed  me,  when  I  heard  them  (for  alas ! 
even  his  very  title  pages  and  contents  my 
friend  composes  only  in  air !)  I  shall  pro- 
bably attempt  to  preserve  in  different  parts  of 
these  Omniana.  At  present  I  shall  cite  one 
article  only  which  I  found  wafered  on  a  blank 
leaf  of  his  memorandum  book,  superscribed : 
"  Flattering  news  for  Anno  Domini  2000, 
whenever  it  shall  institute  a  comparison  be- 
tween itself  and  the  17th  and  18th  centuries." 
It  consists  of  an  extract,  say  rather,  an  exsec- 
tion  from  the  Kingston  Mercantile  Advertiser, 
from  Saturday,  August  the  15th,  to  Tuesday, 
August  18th,  1801.  This  paper  which  con- 
tained at  least  twenty  more  advertisements  of 
the  very  same  kind,  was  found  by  accident 
among  the  wrapping-papers  in  the  trunk  of 
an  officer  just  returned  from  the  West  India 


318  OMNIANA. 

station.     Tliey  stand   here  exactly  as  in  the 
original,  from  which  they  are  reprinted  : — 

King-ston,  July  30,  1801. 

Run  away,  about  three  weeks  ago,  from  a  penn  near  Half- 
way Tree,  a  negro  wench,  named  Nancy,  of  the  Chamba 
country,  strong  made,  an  ulcer  on  her  left  leg,  marked  D.  C. 
diamond  between.  She  is  supposed  to  be  harboured  by  her 
husband,  Dublin,  who  has  the  direction  of  a  wherry  working 
between  this  town  and  Port  Royal,  and  is  the  property  of  Mr. 
Fishley,  of  that  place ;  the  said  negro  man  having  concealed 
a  boy  in  his  wherry  before.  Half  a  joe  will  be  paid  to  any 
person  apprehending  the  above  described  wench,  and  deliver- 
ing to  Mr.  Archibald  M'  Lea,  East  end  ;  and  if  found  secreted 
by  any  person,  the  law  will  be  put  in  force. 

Kingston,  August  13,  1801. 

Strayed  on  Monday  evening  last,  a  negro  boy  of  the  Moco 
country,  named  Joe,  the  property  of  Mr.  Thomas  Williams, 
planter,  in  St.  John's,  who  had  sent  him  to  town  under  the 
charge  of  a  negro  man,  with  a  cart  for  provisions.  The  said 
boy  is,  perhaps,  from  15  to  18  years  of  age,  about  twelve 
months  in  the  country,  no  mark,  speaks  little  English,  but 
can  tell  his  owner's  name;  had  on  a  long  Oznaburg  frock. 
It  is  supposed  he  might  have  gone  out  to  vend  some  pears  and 
lemon-grass,  and  have  lost  himself  in  the  street.  One  pistole 
will  be  paid  to  any  person  apprehending  and  bringing  him  to 
this  ofiice. 

Kingston,  July  1,  1801. 
Forty  Shillings  Reward. 

Strayed  on  Friday  evening  last,  (and  was  seen  going  up 
West  Street  the  following  morning),  a  small  bay 

HORSE, 
the  left  ear  lapped,  flat  rump,  much  scored  from  the  saddle  on 
his  back,  and  marked  on  the  near  side  F.  M.  with  a  diamond 
between.  Whoever  will  take  up  the  said  horse,  and  deliver 
him  to  W.  Balantine,  butcher,  back  of  West  Street,  will  re- 
ceive the  above  reward. 

Kingston,  July  4,  1801. 

Strayed  on  Sunday  morning  last,  from  the  subscriber's 
house,  in  East  Street,  a  bright  dun  He-Mule,  the  mane  lately 


OMNI  AN  A.  319 

cropped,  a  large  chafe  slightly  skinned  over  on  the  near  but- 
tock, and  otherwise  chafed  from  the  action  of  the  harness  in 
his  recent  breaking.  Half  a  joe  will  be  paid  to  any  person 
taking  up  and  bringing  this  mule  to  the  subscriber's  house,  or 
to  the  Store  in  Harbour  Street.  John  Walsh. 

Kingston,  July  2,  1801. 

Ten  pounds  Reward, 
Ran  away 
About  two  years  ago  from  the  subscriber,  a  Negro  woman 
named 

DORAH, 
purchased  from  Alexander  M'Kean,  Esq.  She  is  about  20 
years  of  age,  and  5  feet  6  or  7  inches  high ;  has  a  mark  on 
one  of  her  shoulders,  about  the  size  of  a  quarter  dollar,  occa- 
sioned, she  says,  by  the  yaws ;  of  a  coal  black  complexion, 
very  artful,  and  most  probably  passes  about  the  country  with 
false  papers  and  under  another  name;  if  that  is  not  the  case, 
it  must  be  presumed  she  is  harboured  about  Green  pond,  where 
she  has  a  mother  and  other  connexions. 

What  a  history  !  horses  and  negros  !  negros 
and  horses !  It  makes  me  tremble  at  my  own 
nature.  Surely,  every  religious  and  conscien- 
tious Briton  is  equally  a  debtor  in  gratitude  to 
Thomas  Clarkson  and  his  fellow  labourers  with 
every  African :  for  on  the  soul  of  every  indivi- 
dual among  us  did  a  portion  of  guilt  rest,  as 
long  as  the  Slave  Trade  remained  legal. 

A  few  years  back  the  public  was  satiated 
with  accounts  of  the  happy  condition  of  the 
slaves  in  our  colonies,  and  the  great  encourage- 
ments and  facilities  afforded  to  such  of  them, 
as  by  industry  and  foresight  laboured  to  better 
their  situation.  With  what  truth  this  is  stated 
as  the  general  tone  of  feeling  among  our  plan- 
ters, and  their  agents,  may  be  conjectured  from 


320  OMNIANA. 

the  following-  sentences,  which  made  part  of 
what  in  England  we  call  the  leading  paragraph 
of  the  same  newspaper  : — 

Strange  as  it  may  appear,  we  are  assured  as  a  fact,  that  a 
number  of  slaves  in  this  town  have  purchased  lots  of  land,  and 
are  absolutely  in  possession  of  the  fee  simple  of  lands  and  te- 
nements. Neither  is  it  uncommon  for  the  men  slaves  to  pur- 
chase or  manumize  their  wives,  and  vice  versa,  the  wives  their 
husbands.  To  account  for  this,  we  need  only  look  to  the  de- 
predations daily  committed,  and  the  impositions  practised  to 
the  distress  of  the  community  and  ruin  of  the  fair  trader. 
Negro  yards  too,  under  such  direction,  will  necessarily  prove 
the  asylum  of  runaways  from  the  country. 


TEXT  SPARRING. 

When  I  hear  (as  who  now  can  travel  twenty 
miles  in  a  stage  coach  without  the  probability 
of  hearing)  an  ignorant  religionist  quote  an 
unconnected  sentence  of  half  a  dozen  words 
from  any  part  of  the  Old  or  New  Testament, 
and  resting  on  the  literal  sense  of  these  words 
the  eternal  misery  of  all  who  reject,  nay,  even 
of  all  those  countless  myriads,  who  have  never 
had  the  opportunity  of  accepting  this,  and 
sundry  other  articles  of  faith  conjured  up  by 
the  same  textual  magic  ;  I  ask  myself  what 
idea  these  persons  form  of  the  Bible,  that  they 
should  use  it  in  a  way  in  which  they  themselves 
use  no  other  book?  They  deem  the  whole 
written  by  inspiration.  Well !  but  is  the  very 
essence  of  rational  discourse,  that  is,  connec- 


OMNIANA.  321 

tion  and  dependency  done  away,  because  the 
discourse  is  infallibly  rational  ?  The  mysteries, 
which  these  spiritual  lynxes  detect  in  the  sim- 
plest texts,  remind  me  of  the  500  nondescripts, 
each  as  large  as  his  own  black  cat,  which  Dr. 
Katterfelto,  by  aid  of  his  solar  microscope,  dis- 
covered in  a  drop  of  transparent  water. 

But  to  a  contemporary  who  has  not  thrown 
his  lot  in  the  same  helmet  with  them,  these 
fanatics  think  it  a  crime  to  listen.  Let  them 
then,  or  far  rather,  let  those  who  are  in  danger 
of  infection  from  them,  attend  to  the  golden 
aphorisms  of  the  old  and  orthodox  divines. 
"  Sentences  in  scripture  (says  Dr.  Donne)  like 
hairs  in  horses'  tails,  concur  in  one  rootof  beauty 
and  strength ;  but  being  plucked  out,  one  by 
one,  serve  only  for  springes  and  snares." 

The  second  I  transcribe  from  the  preface  to 
Lightfoot's  works.  "  Inspired  writings  are  an 
inestimable  treasure  to  mankind  ;  for  so  many 
sentences,  so  many  truths.  But  then  the  true 
sense  of  them  must  be  known :  otherwise, 
so  many  sentences,  so  many  authorized  false- 
hoods." 


PELAGIANISM. 

Our  modern  latitudinarians  will  find  it  diffi- 
cult to  suppose,  that  any  thing  could  have  been 
said  in  the  defence  of  Pelagianism  equally 
absurd   with  the  facts  and    arguments  which 

VOL.  I.  Y 


322  OMNIANA. 

have  been  adduced  in  favour  of  original  sin, 
(sin  being  taken  as  guilt ;  that  is,  observes  a 
Socinian  wit,  the  crime  of  being  born).  But  in 
the  connnent  of  Rabbi  Akibah  on  Ecclesiastes 
xii.  1 .  we  have  a  story  of  a  mother,  who  must 
have  been  a  most  determined  believer  in  the 
uninheritability  of  sin.  For  having  a  sickly 
and  deformed  child,  and  resolved  that  it  should 
not  be  thought  to  have  been  punished  for  any 
fault  of  its  parents  or  ancestors,  and  yet  having 
nothing  else  for  which  to  blame  the  child,  she 
seriously  and  earnestly  accused  it  before  the 
judge  of  having  kicked  her  unmercifully  du- 
ring her  pregnancy. 

I  am  firmly  persuaded  that  no  doctrine  was 
ever  widely  diftused  among  various  nations 
through  successive  ages  and  under  difterent 
religions,  (such  as  is  the  doctrine  of  original 
sin,  and  redemption,  those  fundamental  articles 
of  every  known  religion  professing  to  be  re- 
vealed,) which  is  not  founded  either  in  the  na- 
ture of  things  or  in  the  necessities  of  our  nature. 
In  the  language  of  the  schools,  it  cariies  with 
it  presumptive  evidence  that  it  is  either  objec- 
tively or  subjectively  true.  And  the  more 
strange  and  contradictory  such  a  doctrine  may 
appear  to  the  understanding,  or  discursive  fa- 
culty, the  stronger  is  the  presumption  in  its 
favour.  For  whatever  satirists  may  say,  and 
sciolists  imagine,  the  human  mind  has  no  pre- 
dilection for  absurdity.  I  do  not,  however, 
mean  that  such  a  doctrine  shall  be  always  the 


OMNIANA.  323 

best  possible  representation  of  the  truth  on 
which  it  is  founded ;  for  the  same  body  casts 
strangely  different  shadows  in  different  places, 
and  different  degrees  of  light,  but  that  it  always 
does  shadow  out  some  such  truth,  and  derive 
its  influence  over  our  faith  from  our  obscure 
perception  of  that  truth.  Yea,  even  where  the 
person  himself  attributes  his  belief  of  it  to  the 
miracles,  with  which  it  was  announced  by  the 
founder  of  his  religion. 


THE  SOUL  AND  ITS  ORGANS  OF  SENSE. 

It  is  a  strong  presumptive  proof  against  mate- 
rialism, that  there  does  not  exist  a  language  on 
earth,  from  the  rudest  to  the  most  refined,  in 
which  a  materialist  can  talk  for  five  minutes 
together,  without  involving  some  contradiction 
in  terms  to  his  own  system.  Objection.  Will 
not  this  apply  equally  to  the  astronomer? 
Newton,  no  doubt,  talked  of  the  sun's  rising 
and  setting,  just  like  other  men.  What  should 
we  think  of  the  coxcomb  who  should  have  ob- 
jected to  him,  that  he  contradicted  his  own 
system  ?  Ansiver — No !  it  does  not  apply 
equally ;  say  rather,  it  is  utterly  inapplicable 
to  the  astronomer  and  natural  philosopher. 
For  his  philosophic,  and  his  ordinary  language 
speak  of  two  quite  different  things,  both  of 
which  are  equally  true.  In  his  ordinary  lan- 
guage he  refers  to  a  fact  of  appearance,  to  a 


324  OMNI  AN  A. 

phenomenon  common  and  necessary  to  all  per- 
sons in  a  given  situation ;  in  his  scientific  lan- 
guage he  determines  that  one  position  or  figure, 
wliich  being  supposed,  the  appearance  in  ques- 
tion would  be  the  necessary  result,  and  all  ap- 
pearances in  all  situations  maybe  demonstrably 
foretold.  Let  a  body  be  suspended  in  the  air, 
and  strongly  illuminated.  What  figure  is  here? 
A  triangle.  But  what  here?  A  trapezium; — and 
so  on.  The  same  question  put  to  twenty  men, 
in  twenty  different  positions  and  distances, 
would  receive  twenty  different  answers :  each 
would  be  a  true  answer.  But  what  is  that  one 
figure  which,  being  so  placed,  all  these  facts  of 
appearance  must  result  according  to  the  law  of 
perspective  ? — Ay  !  this  is  a  different  question, 
this  is  a  new  subject.  The  words  which  answer 
this  would  be  absurd  if  used  in  reply  to  the 
former.* 

Thus,  the  language  of  the  scripture  on  natu- 
ral objects  is  as  strictly  philosophical  as  that  of 
the  Newtonian  system.  Perhaps  more  so. 
For  it  is  not  only  equally  true,  but  it  is  universal 
among  mankind,  and  unchangeable.  It  de- 
scribes facts  of  appearance.  And  what  other 
language  would  have  been  consistent  with  the 
divine  wisdom  ?  The  inspired  writers  must 
have  borrowed  their  terminology,  either  from 
the  crude  and  mistaken  philosophy  of  their 
own  times,  and  so  have  sanctified  and  perpe- 

*  See  Church  and  State.     Appendix,  p.  231.     Ed. 


OMNIANA.  325 

tiiated  falsehood,  unintelligible  meantime  to  all 
but  one  in  ten  thousand ;  or  they  must  have 
anticipated  the  terminology  of  the  true  system, 
without  any  revelation  of  the  system  itself,  and 
so  have  become  unintelligible  to  all  men  ;  or 
lastly,  they  must  have  revealed  the  system 
itself,  and  thus  have  left  nothing  for  the  exer- 
cise, developement,  or  reward  of  the  human 
understanding,  instead  of  teaching  that  moral 
knowledge,  and  enforcing  those  social  and  civic 
virtues,  out  of  which  the  arts  and  sciences  will 
spring  up  in  due  time  and  of  their  own  accord. 
But  nothing  of  this  applies  to  the  materialist ; 
he  refers  to  the  very  same  facts,  of  which  the 
common  language  of  mankind  speaks :  and 
these  too  are  facts  that  have  their  sole  and 
entire  being  in  our  own  consciousness ;  facts,  as 
to  which  esse  and  conscire  are  identical.  Now, 
whatever  is  common  to  all  languages,  in  all 
climates,  at  all  times,  and  in  all  stages  of  civi- 
lization, must  be  the  exponent  and  consequent 
of  the  common  consciousness  of  man  as  man. 
Whatever  contradicts  this  universal  language, 
therefore,  contradicts  the  universal  conscious- 
ness, and  the  facts  in  question  subsisting  ex- 
clusively in  consciousness,  whatever  contradicts 
the  consciousness  contradicts  the  fact. 

I  have  been  seduced  into  a  dry  discussion 
where  I  had  intended  only  a  iew  amusing  facts, 
in  proof,  that  the  mind  makes  the  sense  far 
more  than  the  senses  make  the  mind.  If  I 
have  life,  and  health,  and  leisure,  I  purpose  to 


32G  OMNIANA. 

compile  from  the  works,  memoirs,  and  trans- 
actions of  the  different  philosophical  societies 
in  Europe,  from  magazines,  and  the  rich  store 
of  medical  and  psychological  publications,  fur- 
nished by  the  English,  French,  and  German 
press,  all  the  essays  and  cases  that  relate  to 
the  human  faculties  under  unusual  circum- 
stances, (for  pathology  is  the  crucible  of  phy- 
siology), excluding  such  only  as  are  not  intel- 
ligible without  the  symbols  or  terminology  of 
science.  These  I  would  arrange  under  the 
different  senses  and  powers :  as  the  eye,  the 
ear,  the  touch,  &c. ;  the  imitative  power,  vo- 
luntary and  automatic ;  the  imagination,  or 
shaping  and  modifying  power;  the  fancy  or 
the  aggregative  and  associative  power;  the 
understanding,  or  the  regulative,  substantiating, 
and  realizing  power;  the  speculative  reason, 
vis  theoretica  et  scientijica,  or  the  power,  by 
which  we  produce,  or  aim  to  produce,  unity, 
necessity,  and  a  universality  in  all  our  know- 
ledge by  means  of  principles,  *a  priori;  the 
will  or  practical  reason  ;  the  faculty  of  choice, 

*  This  phrase,  a  priori,  is,  in  common,  most  grossly  misun- 
derstood, and  an  absurdity  burthened  on  it  which  it  does  not 
deserve.  By  knowledge  a  priori,  we  do  not  mean  that  we 
can  know  any  thing  previously  to  experience,  which  would  be 
a  contradiction  in  terms ;  but  having  once  known  it  by  occa- 
sion of  experience  (that  is,  something  acting  upon  us  from 
without)  we  then  know,  that  it  must  have  pre-existed,  or  the 
experience  itself  would  have  been  impossible.  By  experience 
only  I  know,  that  I  have  eyes ;  but  then  my  reason  convinces 
me,  that  1  must  have  had  eyes  in  order  to  the  experience. 


OMNIANA.  327 

(Willkiilir),  and  (distinct  both  from  the  moral 
will,  and  the  choice),  the  sensation  of  volition 
which  I  have  found  reason  to  include  under  the 
head  of  single  and  double  touch.     Thence  I 
propose  to  make  a  new  arrangement  of  mad- 
ness, whether  as  defect,  or  as  excess,  of  any  of 
these  senses  or  faculties  ;   and  thus  by  appro- 
priate cases  to  shew  the  difference  between  ; — 
1.  a  man  having  lost  his  reason  but  not  his 
senses  or  understanding — that  is,  when  he  sees 
things  as  other  men  see  them,— adapts  means 
to  ends  as  other  men  would  adapt  them,  and 
not  seldom,  with  more  sagacity, — but  his  final 
end  is  altogether  irrational :    2.  his  having  lost 
his  wits,  that  is,  his  understanding  or  judicial 
power ;    but  not  his  reason  or  the  use  of  his 
senses, — (such  was  Don  Quixote ;  and,  there- 
fore, we  love  and  reverence  him,  while  we  des- 
pise Hudibras)  :  3.  his  being  out  of  his  senses, 
as  in  the  case  of  a  hypochondriac,  to  whom  his 
limbs  appear  to  be  of  glass,  although  all  his 
conduct  is  both  rational,  or  moral,  and  prudent : 
4.  Or  the  case  may  be  a  combination  of  all 
three,  though  I  doubt  the  existence  of  such  a 
case,  or  of  any  two  of  them :    5.  And  lastly, 
it  may  be  merely  such  an  excess  of  sensation, 
as  overpowers  and  suspends  all,  which  is  frenzy 
or  raving  madness. 

A  diseased  state  of  an  organ  of  sense,  or  of 
the  inner  organs  connected  with  it,  will  perpe- 
tually tamper  with  the  understanding,  and  un- 
less there  be  an  energetic  and  watchful  counter- 


328  OMNIANA. 

action  of  the  judo;ment  (of  whicli  I  have  known 
more  than  one  instance,  in  which  the  compa- 
ring and  reflecting  judgment  has  obstinately, 
though  painfully,  rejected  the  full  testimony  of 
the  senses,)  will  finally  overpower  it.  But  when 
the  organ  is  obliterated,  or  totally  suspended, 
then  the  mind  applies  some  other  organ  to  a 
double  use.  Passing  through  Temple  Sow- 
erby,  in  Westmorland,  some  ten  years  back,  I 
was  shewn  a  man  perfectly  blind  ;  and  blind 
from  his  infancy.  Powell  was  his  name.  This 
man's  chief  amusement  was  fishing  on  the  wild 
and  uneven  banks  of  the  River  Eden,  and  up 
the  different  streams  and  tarns  among  the 
mountains.  He  had  an  intimate  friend,  like- 
wise stone  blind,  a  dexterous  card  player,  who 
knows  every  gate  and  stile  far  and  near 
throughout  the  country.  These  two  often 
coursed  together,  and  the  people  here,  as 
every  where,  fond  of  the  marvellous,  affirm 
that  they  were  the  best  beaters  up  of  game  in 
the  whole  country.  The  every  way  amiable 
and  estimable  John  Gough  of  Kendal  is  not 
only  an  excellent  mathematician,  but  an  infal- 
lible botanist  and  zoologist.  He  has  frequently 
at  the  first  feel  corrected  the  mistakes  of  the 
most  experienced  sportsman  with  regard  to  the 
birds  or  vermin  which  they  had  killed,  when 
it  chanced  to  be  a  variety  or  rare  species  so 
completely  resembling  the  common  one,  that 
it  required  great  steadiness  of  observation  to 
detect  the  difference,  even  after  it  had  been 


OMNIANA.  329 

pointed  out.  As  to  plants  and  flowers,  the  ra- 
pidity of  his  touch  appears  fully  equal  to  that 
of  sight ;  and  the  accuracy  greater.  Good 
heavens !  it  needs  only  to  look  at  him !  Why 
his  face  sees  all  over !  It  is  all  one  eye !  I  al- 
most envied  him  ;  for  the  purity  and  excellence 
of  his  own  nature,  never  broken  in  upon  by 
those  evil  looks,  (or  features,  which  are  looks 
become  fixtures),  with  which  low  cunning, 
habitual  cupidity,  presumptuous  sciolism,  and 
heart-hardening  vanity,  coarsen  the  human 
face, — it  is  the  mere  stamp,  the  undisturbed 
eciypoii  of  his  own  soul !  Add  to  this  that  he 
is  a  Quaker,  with  all  the  blest  negatives,  with- 
out any  of  the  silly  and  factious  positives,  of 
that  sect,  which,  with  all  its  bogs  and  hollows, 
is  still  the  prime  sun-shine  spot  of  Christendom 
in  the  eye  of  the  true  philosopher.  When  I 
was  in  Germany  in  the  year  1798,  I  read  at 
Hanover,  and  met  with  two  respectable  per- 
sons, one  a  clergyman,  the  other  a  physician, 
who  confirmed  to  me,  the  account  of  the  upper- 
stall  master  at  Hanover,  written  by  himself, 
and  countersigned  by  all  his  medical  atten- 
dants. As  far  as  I  recollect,  he  had  fallen 
from  his  horse  on  his  head,  and  in  consequence 
of  the  blow  lost  both  his  sight  and  hearing  for 
nearly  three  years,  and  continued  for  the 
greater  part  of  this  period  in  a  state  of  nervous 
fever.  His  understanding,  however,  remained 
miimpaired  and  unaffected,  and  his  entire  con- 
sciousness, as  to  outward  impressions,  being 


330  OMNIANA. 

confined  to  the  sense  of  touch,  he  at  length 
became  capable  of  reading  any  book  (if  printed, 
as  most  German  books  are,  on  coarse  paper) 
with  his  lingers,  in  much  the  same  manner  in 
which  the  piano-forte  is  played,  and  latterly 
with  an  almost  incredible  rapidity.  Likewise 
by  placing  his  hand  with  the  fingers  all  ex- 
tended, at  a  small  distance  from  the  lips  of  any 
person  that  spoke  slowly  and  distinctly  to  him, 
he  learned  to  recognize  each  letter  by  its  difie- 
rent  effects  on  his  nerves,  and  thus  spelt  the 
words  as  they  were  uttered.  It  was  particularly 
noticed  both  by  himself  from  his  sensations,  and 
by  his  medical  attendants  from  observation, 
that  the  letter  R,  if  pronounced  full  and  strong, 
and  recurring  once  or  more  in  the  same  word, 
produced  a  small  spasm,  or  twitch  in  his  hand 
and  fingers.  At  the  end  of  three  years  he  re- 
covered both  his  health  and  senses,  and  with 
the  necessity  soon  lost  the  power,  which  he  had 
thus  acquired. 


SIR  GEORGE  ETHEREGE,  ETC. 

Often  and  often  had  I  read  Gay's  Beggar's 
Opera,  and  always  delighted  with  its  poignant 
wit  and  original  satire,  and  if  not  without  noti- 
cing its  immorality,  yet  without  any  offence 
from  it.  Some  years  ago,  I  for  the  first  time 
saw  it  represented  in  one  of  the  London  the- 


OMNIANA.  331 

atres ;  and  such  were  the  horror  and  disgust 
with  which  it  impressed  me,  so  grossly  did  it 
outrage  all  the  best  feelings  of  my  nature,  that 
even  the  angelic  voice,  and  perfect  science  of 
Mrs.  Billington,  lost  half  their  charms,  or  rather 
increased  my  aversion  to  the  piece  by  an  addi- 
tional sense  of  incongruity.  Then  I  learned 
the  immense  difference  between  reading  and 
seeing  a  play  ; — and  no  wonder,  indeed  ;  for 
who  has  not  passed  over  with  his  eye  a  hundred 
passages  without  offence,  which  he  yet  could 
not  have  even  read  aloud,  or  have  heard  so 
read  by  another  person,  without  an  inward 
struggle  ? — In  mere  passive  silent  reading  the 
thoughts  remain  mere  thoughts,  and  these  too 
not  our  own, — phantoms  with  no  attribute  of 
place,  no  sense  of  appropriation,  that  flit  over 
the  consciousness  as  shadows  over  the  grass  or 
young  corn  in  an  April  day.  But  even  the 
sound  of  our  own  or  another's  voice  takes  them 
out  of  that  lifeless,  twilight,  realm  of  thought, 
which  is  the  confine,  the  intermimclium,  as  it 
were,  of  existence  and  non-existence.  Merely 
that  the  thoughts  have  become  audible  by 
blending  with  them  a  sense  of  outness  gives 
them  a  sort  of  reality.  What  then, — when  by 
every  contrivance  of  scenery,  appropriate  dres- 
ses, according  and  auxiliary  looks  and  ges- 
tures, and  the  variety  of  persons  on  the  stage, 
realities  are  employed  to  carry  the  imitation  of 
reality  as  near  as  possible  to  perfect  delusion  ? 


332  OMNIANA. 

If  a  manly  modesty  shrinks  from  uttering  an 
indecent  phrase  before  a  wife  or  sister  in  a 
private  room,  what  must  be  the  effect  when  a 
repetition  of  such  treasons  (for  all  gross  and 
libidinous  allusions  are  emphatically  treasons 
against  the  very  foundations  of  human  society, 
against  all  its  endearing  charities,  and  all  the 
mother  virtues,)  is  hazarded  before  a  mixed 
multitude  in  a  public  theatre?  When  every 
innocent  woman  must  blush  at  once  Avith  pain 
at  the  thoughts  she  rejects,  and  with  indignant 
shame  at  those,  which  the  foul  hearts  of  others 
may  attribute  to  her ! 

Thus  too  with  regard  to  the  comedies  of 
Wycherly,  Vanburgh,  and  Etherege,  I  used  to 
please  myself  with  the  flattering  comparison  of 
the  manners  universal  at  present  among  all 
classes  above  the  lowest  with  those  of  our  an- 
cestors even  of  the  highest  ranks.  But  if  for 
a  moment  I  think  of  those  comedies  as  having 
been  acted,  I  lose  all  sense  of  comparison  in 
the  shame,  that  human  nature  could  at  any 
time  have  endured  such  outrages  to  its  dignity  ; 
and  if  conjugal  affection  and  the  sweet  name 
of  sister  were  too  weak,  that  yet  filial  piety,  the 
gratitude  for  a  mother's  holy  love,  should  not 
have  risen  and  hissed  into  infancy  these  traitors 
to  their  own  natural  gifts,  who  himpooned  the 
noblest  passions  of  humanity,  in  order  to  pan- 
der for  its  lowest  appetites. 

As  far,  however,  as  one  bad  thing  can  be 
palliated  by  comparison  with  a  worse,  this  may 


OMNIANA. 


333 


be  said,  in  extenuation  of  these  writers ;  that 
the  mischief,  which  they  can  do  even  on  the 
stage,  is  trifling  compared  with  that  stile  of 
writing  whichbegan  in  the  pest-house  of  French 
literature,  and  has  of  late  been   imported  by 
the  Littles  of  the  age,  which  consists  in  a  perpe- 
tual tampering  with  the  morals  without  offend- 
ing the  decencies.     And  yet  the  admirers  of 
these  publications,  nay,  the  authors  themselves 
have  the  assurance  to  complain  of  Shakspeare 
(for  I  will  not  refer  to  one  yet  far  deeper  blas- 
phemy)— Shakspeare,  whose  most  objection- 
able passages  are  but  grossnesses  against  lust, 
and  these  written  in  a  gross  age ;  while  three 
fourths  of  their  whole  works  are  delicacies  for 
its   support  and  sustenance.      Lastly,  that   I 
may  leave  the  reader  in  better  humour  with  the 
name  at  the  head  of  this  article,  I  shall  quote 
one  scene  from  Etherege's  Love  in   a  Tub, 
which  for  exquisite,  genuine,  original  humour, 
is  worth  all  the  rest  of  his  plays,  though  two 
or   three   of    his   witty    contemporaries    were 
thrown  in    among  them,   as  a  make  weight. 
The  scene  might  be  entitled,  the  different  ways 
in   which  the  very  same   story  may  be   told 
without  any  variation  in  matter  of  fact ;    for 
the  least  attentive  reader  will  perceive  the  per- 
fect identity  of  the  footboy's  account  with  the 
Frenchman's  own  statement  in  contradiction 
to  it. 


334  OMNIANA. 


SCENE  IV. 

Scene — Sir  Frederick's  Lodging. 

Enter  Dufoy  and  Clakk. 

Clark.  I  wonder  Sir  Frederick  stays  out  so  late. 

Dufoy.  Dis  is  noting;  six,  seven  o'clock  in  the  morning 
is  ver  good  hour. 

Clark.  I  hope  he  does  not  use  these  hours  often. 

Dufoy.  Some  six,  seven  time  a  veek ;  no  oftiner. 

Clark.  My  Lord  commanded  me  to  wait  his  coming. 

Dufoy.  Matre  Clark,  to  divertise  you,  I  vill  tell  you,  how  I 
did  get  be  acquainted  vid  dis  Bedlam  Matre.  About  two, 
tree  year  ago  me  had  for  my  convenience  discharge  myself 
from  attending  (Enter  afoot  boy)  as  Matre  D'ostel  to  a  per- 
son of  condition  in  Parie ;  it  hapen  after  de  dispatch  of  my 
little  affaire. 

Foot  B.  That  is,  after  h'ad  spent  his  money,  Sir. 

Difoy.  Jan  foutre  de  lacque;  me  vil  have  vip  and  de 
belle  vor  your  breeck,  rogue. 

Foot  B.  Sir,  in  a  word,  he  was  a  Jack-pudding  to  a  moun- 
tebank, and  turned  off  for  want  of  wit :  my  master  picked  him 
up  before  a  puppet-show,  mumbling  a  half-penny  custard,  to 
send  him  with  a  letter  to  the  post. 

Dufoy.  Morbleu,  see,  see  de  insolence  of  de  foot  boy 
English,  bogre,  rascale,  you  lie,  begar  I  vill  cutteyour  troate. 

\^Exit  Foot  Boy. 

Clark.  He's  a  rogue ;  on  with  your  story.  Monsieur. 
Dufoy.  Matre  Clark,  I  am  your  ver  humble  serviteur ;  but 
begar  me  have  no  patience  to  be  abuse.  As  I  did  say,  after 
de  dispatche  of  my  affaire,  von  day  being  idele,  vich  does  pro- 
duce the  mellanchollique,  I  did  valke  over  de  new  bridge  in 
Parie,  and  to  divertise  de  time,  and  my  more  serious  toughte, 
me  did  look  to  see  de  marrionete,  and  Ae  jack-pudding ,  vich 
did  play  hundred  pretty  tricke;  time  de  collation  vas  come; 
and  vor  I  had  no  company,  I  vas  unvilling  to  go  to  de  Caba- 
rete,  but  did  buy  a  darriole,  littel  custarde  vich  did  satisfie  my 
appetite  ver  vel :  in  dis  time  young  Monsieur  de  Grandvil  (a 
jentelman  of  ver  great  quality,  van  dat  vas  my  ver  good 
friende,  and  has  done  me  ver  great  and  insignal  faveure)  come 


OMNIANA. 


335 


by  in  his  caroche  vid  dis  Sir  Frolick,  who  did  petition  at  the 
same  academy,  to  learn  de  language,  de  bon  mine,  de  great 
horse,  and  many  oder  tricke.  Monsieur  seeing  me  did  make 
de  bowe  and  did  becken  me  to  come  to  him  :  he  did  telle  me 
dat  de  Englis  jentelman  had  de  lettre  vor  de  poste,  and  did 
entreate  me  (if  I  had  de  opportunity)  to  see  de  lettre  delivere  : 
he  did  telle  me  too,  it  void  be  ver  great  obligation  :  de  memory 
of  de  faveurs  I  had  received  from  his  famelye,  beside  de  incli- 
nation I  naturally  have  to  serve  de  strangere,  made  me  returne 
de  complemen  vid  ver  great  civility,  and  so  I  did  take  de  lettre 
and  see  it  delivere.  Sir  Frollick  perceiving  (by  de  manage- 
ment of  dis  affaire)  dat  I  vas  man  d'esprit,  and  of  vitte,  did 
entreate  me  to  be  his  serviteur  ;  me  did  take  d'affection  to  his 
persone,  and  was  coritente  to  live  vid  him,  to  counsel  and 
advise  him.  You  see  now  de  lie  of  de  bougre  de  lacque  En- 
glishe,  morbleu. 


EVIDENCE. 

When  I  was  at  Malta,  1805,  there  happened 
a  drunken  squabble  on  the  road  from  Valette 
to  St.  Antonio,  between  a  party  of  soldiers 
and  another  of  sailors.  They  were  brought 
before  me  the  next  morning,  and  the  great 
effect  which  their  intoxication  had  produced 
on  their  memory,  and  the  little  or  no  effect  on 
their  courage  in  giving  evidence,  may  be  seen 
by  the  following  specimen.  The  soldiers  swore 
that  the  sailors  were  the  first  aggressors,  and 
had  assaulted  them  with  the  following  words  : 

" your  eyes  !  who  stops  the  line  of  march 

there?"  The  sailors  with  equal  vehemence  and 
unanimity  averred,  that  the  soldiers  were  the 
first  aggressors,  and  had  burst  in  on  them  cal- 
ling out — "  Heave  to,  you  lubbers !  or  we'll 
run  you  down." 


336  OMNIANA. 


FORCE  OF  HABIT. 


An  Emir  had  bought  a  left  eye  of  a  glass  eye- 
maker,  supposing  that  he  would  be  able  to  see 
with  it.  The  man  begged  him  to  give  it  a  little 
time  :  he  could  not  expect  that  it  would  see  all 
at  once  as  Mell  as  the  right  eye,  which  had 
been  for  so  many  years  in  the  habit  of  it. 


PHCENIX. 

The  Phoenix  lives  a  thousand  years,  a  secular 
bird  of  ages ;  and  there  is  never  more  than  one 
at  a  time  in  the  world.  Yet  Plutarch  very 
gravely  informs  us,  that  the  brain  of  the  Phoe- 
nix is  a  pleasant  bit,  but  apt  to  occasion  the 
head  ache.  By  the  by,  there  are  few  styles 
that  are  not  fit  for  something.  I  have  often 
wished  to  see  Claudian's  splendid  poem  on  the 
Phoenix  translated  into  English  verse  in  the 
elaborate  rhyme  and  gorgeous  diction  of  Dar- 
win. Indeed  Claudian  throughout  would  bear 
translation  better  than  any  of  the  ancients. 


MEMORY  AND  RECOLLECTION. 

Beasts  and  babies  remember,  that  is,  recog- 
nize :  man  alone  recollects.  This  distinction 
was  made  by  Aristotle. 


OMNIANA.  337 


A  liquid  ex  Nihilo. 

In  answer  to  the  iii/iil  e  nihilo  of  the  atheists, 
and  their  near  relations,  the  aimna-muudi  men, 
a  humourist  pointed  to  a  white  blank  in  a  rude 
wood-cut,  which  very  ingeniously  served  for 
the  head  of  hair  in  one  of  the  figures. 


BREVITY  OF  THE  GREEK  AND  ENGLISH 
COMPARED. 

As  an  instance  of  compression  and  brevity  in 
narration,  unattainable  in  any  language  but  the 
Greek,  the  following  distich  was  quoted  : 

^pvffoi'  uy))p  evpojy,  kXnre  jjpo-^oy'  avrap  6  ^putroj', 
o*'  XiTTtP,  ovk:  evpiji',  ij\piv,  vv  £vpe,  f^po'^or. 

This  was  denied  by  one  of  the  company,  who 
instantly  rendered  the  lines  in  English,  con- 
tending with  reason  that  the  indefinite  article 
in  English,  together  with  the  pronoun  "  his," 
&c.  should  be  considered  as  one  word  with  the 
noun  following,  and  more  than  counterbalanced 
by  the  greater  number  of  syllables  in  the  Greek 
words,  the  terminations  of  which  are  in  truth 
only  little  words  glued  on  to  them.  The  En- 
glish distich  follows,  and  the  reader  will  recol- 
lect that  it  is  a  mere  trial  of  comparative  bre- 
vity, wit  and  poetry  quite  out  of  the  question  : 

Jack  finding  gold  left  a  rope  on  the  ground ; 

Bill  missing  his  gold  used  the  rope,  which  lie  found. 

VOL.  1.  Z 


338  OMNIANA. 


ia09— 1816. 

THE  WILL  AND  THE  DEED. 

The  will  to  the  deed, — the  inward  principle  to 
the  outward  act, — is  as  the  kernel  to  the  shell ; 
but  yet,  in  the  first  place,  the  shell  is  necessary 
for  the  kernel,  and  that  by  which  it  is  commonly 
known ; — and,  in  the  next  place,  as  the  shell 
comes  first,  and  the  kernel  grows  gradually  and 
hardens  within  it,  so  is  it  with  the  moral  prin- 
ciple in  man.  Legality  precedes  morality  in 
every  individual,  even  as  the  Jewish  dispensa- 
tion preceded  the  Christian  in  the  education 
of  the  world  at  large. 


THE  WILL  FOR  THE  DEED. 

When  may  the  will  be  taken  for  the  deed  ? — 
Then  when  the  will  is  the  obedience  of  the 
whole  man  ; — when  the  will  is  in  fact  the  deed, 
that  is,  all  the  deed  in  our  power.  In  every 
other  case,  it  is  bending  the  bow  without  shoot- 
ing the  arrow.  The  bird  of  Paradise  gleams 
on  the  lofty  branch,  and  the  man  takes  aim, 
and  draws  the  tough  yew  into  a  crescent  with 
might  and  main,- — and  lo !  there  is  never  an 
arrow  on  the  string. 


OMNI  AN  A.  339 


SINCERITY. 

The  first  great  requisite  is  absolute  sincerity. 
Falsehood  and  disguise  are  miseries  and  mi- 
sery-makers, under  whatever  strength  of  sym- 
pathy, or  desire  to  prolong  happy  thoughts  in 
others  for  their  sake  or  your  own  only  as  sym- 
pathizing with  theirs,  it  may  originate.  All 
sympathy,  not  consistent  with  acknowledged 
virtue,  is  but  disguised  selfishness. 


TRUTH  AND  FALSEHOOD. 

The  pre-eminence  of  truth  over  falsehood, 
even  when  occasioned  by  that  truth,  is  as  a 
gentle  fountain  breathing  from  forth  its  air-let 
into  the  snow  piled  over  and  around  it,  which 
it  turns  into  its  own  substance,  and  flows  with 
greater  murmur;  and  though  it  be  again  ar- 
rested, still  it  is  but  for  a  time , — it  awaits  only 
the  change  of  the  wind  to  awake  and  roll  on- 
wards its  ever  increasing  stream  : — 

/  semplici  pastori 
Sul  Vesolo  nevoso, 
Fatti  curvi  e  canuti, 
D'  alto  stupor  son  muti, 
Mirando  al  fonte  ombroso 
II  Pa  con  pochi  umori ; 
Poscia  udendo  gV  onori 
DelV  urna  angusta  e  stretta, 


340  OMNIANA. 

Che  'I  Adda,  che  7  Tesino 
Soverchia  il  suo  cammino, 
Che  ampio  al  mar  s"  affretta, 
Che  si  spuma,  e  si  suona, 

Che  gli  si  dd.  corona  ! 

Chiabrera,  Rime,  xxviii. 

But  falsehood  is  fire  in  stubble  ; — it  likewise 
turns  all  the  light  stuff'  around  it  into  its  own 
substance  for  a  moment,  one  crackling  blazing 
moment, — and  then  dies  ;  and  all  its  converts 
are  scattered  in  the  wind,  without  place  or  evi- 
dence of  their  existence,  as  viewless  as  the 
wind  which  scatters  them. 


RELIGIOUS  CEREMONIES. 

A  MAN  may  look  at  glass,  or  through  it,  or 
both.  Let  all  earthly  things  be  unto  thee  as 
glass  to  see  heaven  through  !  Religious  cere- 
monies should  be  pure  glass,  not  dyed  in  the 
gorgeous  crimsons  and  purple  blues  and  greens 
of  the  drapery  of  saints  and  saintesses. 


ASSOCIATION. 

Many  a  star,  which  we  behold  as  single,  the 
astronomer  resolves  into  two,  each,  perhaps, 
the  centre  of  a  separate  system.  Oft  are  the 
flowers  of  the  bind-weed  mistaken  for  the 
growth  of  the  plant,  which  it  chokes  with  its 
intertwine.     And  many  are  the  unsuspected 


OMNIANA.  341 

double  stars,  and  frequent  are  the  parasite 
weeds,  which  the  philosopher  detects  in  the 
received  opinions  of  men  : — so  strong  is  the 
tendency  of  the  imagination  to  identify  what 
it  has  long  consociated.  Things  that  have 
habitually,  though,  perhaps,  accidentally  and 
arbitrarily,  been  thought  of  in  connection  with 
each  other,  we  are  prone  to  regard  as  insepa- 
rable. The  fatal  brand  is  cast  into  the  fire, 
and  therefore  Meleager  must  consume  in  the 
flames.  To  these  conjunctions  of  custom  and 
association — (the  associative  power  of  the  mind 
which  holds  the  mid  place  between  memory 
and  sense,) — we  may  best  apply  Sir  Thomas 
Brown's  remark,  that  many  things  coagulate 
on  commixture,  the  separate  natures  of  which 
promise  no  concretion. 


CURIOSITY. 

The  curiosity  of  an  honourable  mind  willingly 
rests  there,  where  the  love  of  truth  does  not 
urge  it  farther  onward,  and  the  love  of  its 
neighbour  bids  it  stop ; — in  other  words,  it 
willingly  stops  at  the  point,  where  the  inte- 
rests of  truth  do  not  beckon  it  onward,  and 
charity  cries.  Halt ! 


342  OMNIANA. 


NEW  TRUTHS. 

To  all  new  truths,  or  renovation  of  old  truths, 
it  must  be  as  in  the  ark  between  the  destroyed 
and  the  about-to-be  renovated  world.  The 
raven  must  be  sent  out  before  the  dove,  and 
ominous  controversy  must  precede  peace  and 
the  olive- wreath. 


VICIOUS  PLEASURES. 

Gentries,  or  wooden  frames,  are  put  under 
the  arches  of  a  bridge,  to  remain  no  longer 
than  till  the  latter  are  consolidated.  Even  so 
pleasures  are  the  devil's  scaffolding  to  build  a 
habit  upon  ; — that  formed  and  steady,  the 
pleasures  are  sent  for  fire-wood,  and  the  hell 
begins  in  this  life. 


MERITING  HEAVEN, 

Virtue  makes  us  not  worthy,  but  only  wor- 
thier, of  happiness.  Existence  itself  gives  a 
claim  to  joy.  Virtue  and  happiness  are  in- 
commensurate quantities.  How  much  virtue 
must  I  have,  before  I  have  paid  off  the  old 
debt  of  my  happiness  in  infancy  and  child- 
hood !  O  !   We  all  outrun  the  constable  with 


OMNIANA.  343 

heaveirs  justice !   We  have  to  earn  the  earth, 
before  we  can  think  of  earning  heaven. 


DUST  TO  DUST. 
We  were  indeed, — 

iravra  koviq,  koX  Travra  yiXiog,  Kai  Trctvra  to  fjirjbey — 

if  we  did  not  feel  that  we  were  so. 


HUMAN  COUNTENANCE. 

There  is  in  every  human  countenance  either  a 
history  or  a  prophecy,  which  must  sadden,  or 
at  least  soften,  every  reflecting  observer. 


LIE  USEFUL  TO  TRUTH. 

A  LIE  accidentally  useful  to  the  cause  of  an 
oppressed  truth  :  Thus  was  the  tongue  of  a  dog 
made  medicinal  to  a  feeble  and  sickly  Lazarus. 


SCIENCE  IN  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  STATES. 

In  Roman  Catholic  states,  where  science  has 
forced  its  way,  and  some  light  must  follow,  the 
devil  himself  cunningly  sets  up  a  shop  for 
common  sense  at  the  sign  of  the  Infidel. 


344  OMNIANA. 


VOLUNTARY  BELIEF. 

"  It  is  possible,"  says  Jeremy  Taylor,  "  for  a 
man  to  bring  liimself  to  believe  any  thing  he 
hath  a  mind  to."  But  what  is  this  belief? — 
Analyse  it  into  its  constituents ; — is  it  more 
than  certain  passions  or  feelings  converging 
into  the  sensation  of  positiveness  as  their  focus, 
and  then  associated  with  certain  sounds  or 
images? — Nemo  eiiim,  says  Augustin,  Imic evi- 
denticB  contraclicet,  nisi  quem  plus  defensare  de- 
lectat,  quod  sentit,  qumn,  quid  sentiendmn  sit^ 
invenire. 


AMANDA. 

Lovely  and  pure — no  bird  of  Paradise,  to  feed 
on  dew  and  flower-fragrance,  and  never  to 
ahght  on  earth,  till  shot  by  death  with  pointless 
shaft ;  but  a  rose,  to  fix  its  roots  in  the  genial 
earth,  thence  to  suck  up  nutriment  and  bloom 
strong  and  healthy, — not  to  droop  and  fade 
amid  sunshine  and  zephyrs  on  a  soilless  rock ! 
Her  marriage  was  no  meagre  prose  comment 
on  the  glowing  and  gorgeous  poetry  of  her 
wooing ; — nor  did  the  surly  over-browing  rock 
of  reality  ever  cast  the  dusky  shadow  of  this 
earth  on  the  soft  moonlight  of  her  love's  first 
phantasies. 


OMNI  ANA.  345 


HYMEN'S  TORCIL 

The  torch  of  love  may  be  blown  out  wholly, 
but  not  that  of  Hymen.  Whom  the  flame  and 
its  cheering  light  and  genial  warmth  no  longer 
bless,  him  the  smoke  stifles ;  for  the  spark  is 
inextinguishable,  save  by  death  : — 

nigro  circumvelatus  amictu 
Mceret  Hymeri,  fumantque  atrce  sine  lumine  tcedce. 


YOUTH  AND  AGE. 


Youth  beholds  happiness  gleaming  in  the 
prospect.  Age  looks  back  on  the  happiness 
of  youth  ;  and  instead  of  hopes,  seeks  its  enjoy- 
ment in  the  recollections  of  hope. 


DECEMBER  MORNING. 


The  giant  shadows  sleeping  amid  the  wan 
yellow  light  of  the  December  morning,  looked 
like  wrecks  and  scattered  ruhis  of  the  long, 
long  night. 


346  OMNIANA. 


ARCHBISHOP  LEIGHTON. 

Next  to  the  inspired  Scriptures, — yea,  and  as 
the  vibration  of  that  once  struck  hour  remain- 
ing on  the  air,  stands  Leighton's  Commentary 
on  the  first  Epistle  of  Peter. 


CHRISTIAN  HONESTY. 

"  O  !  that  God,  '  says  Carey  in  his  Journal  in 
Hindostan,  "  would  make  the  Gospel  success- 
ful among  them !  That  would  undoubtedly 
miake  them  honest  men,  and  I  fear  nothing 
else  ever  will."  Now  this  is  a  fact, — spite  of 
infidels  and  psilosophizing  Christians,  a  fact. 
A  perfect  explanation  of  it  would  require  and 
would  show  the  psychology  of  faith, — the  dif- 
ference between  the  whole  soul's  modifying  an 
action,  and  an  action  enforced  by  modifications 
of  the  soul  amid  prudential  motives  or  favour- 
ing impulses.  Let  me  here  remind  myself  of 
the  absolute  necessity  of  having  my  whole 
faculties  awake  and  imaginative,  in  order  to 
illustrate  this  and  similar  truths; — otherwise 
my  writings  will  be  no  other  than  pages  of 
algebra. 


OMNIANA.  347 


INSCRIPTION  ON  A  CLOCK  IN  CHEAPSIDE. 

What  now  thou  do'st,  or  art  about  to  do, 
Will  help  to  give  thee  peace,  or  make  thee  rue; 
When  hov'ring  o'er  the  hue  this  hand  will  tell 
The  last  dread  moment — 'twill  be  heaven  or  hell. 

Read  for  the  last  two  lines — 

When  wav'ring  o'er  the  dot  this  hand  shall  tell 
The  moment  that  secures  thee  heaven  or  hell ! 


RATIONALISM  IS  NOT  REASON. 

Vens:eance  is  mijie,  saith  the  Lord.  An  awful 
text !  Now  because  vengeance  is  most  wisely 
and  lovingly  forbidden  to  us,  hence  we  have 
by  degrees,  under  false  generalizations  and 
puny  sensibilities,  taken  up  the  notion  that 
vengeance  is  no  where.  In  short,  the  abuse  of 
figurative  interpretation  is  endless; — instead  of 
being  applied,  as  it  ought  to  be,  to  those 
things  which  are  the  most  comprehensible, 
that  is,  sensuous,  and  which  therefore  are  the 
parts  likely  to  be  figurative,  because  such  lan- 
guage is  a  condescension  to  our  weakness, —  it 
is  applied  to  rot  away  the  very  pillars,  yea,  to 
fret  away  and  dissolve  the  very  corner  stones 
of  the  temple  of  religion.  O,  holy  Paul !  O, 
beloved  John  !    full  of  light  and  love,  whose 


348  OMNIANA. 

books  are  full  of  intuitions,  as  those  of  Paul 
are  books  of  energies, — the  one  uttering  to 
sympathizing  angels  what  the  other  toils  to 
convey  to  weak-sighted  yet  docile  men  :—  O 
Luther!  Calvin!  Fox,  with  Penn  and  Bar- 
clay! O  Zinzendorf!  and  ye  too,  whose  out- 
Mard  garments  only  have  been  singed  and 
dishonoured  in  the  heathenish  furnace  of  Ro- 
man apostacy,  Francis  of  Sales,  Fenelon ; — 
yea,  even  Aquinas  and  Scotus ! — ^With  what 
astoundment  would  ye,  if  ye  were  alive  with 
your  merely  human  perfections,  listen  to  the 
creed  of  our,  so  called,  rational  religionists ! 
Rational ! — They,  who  in  the  very  outset  deny 
all  reason,  and  leave  us  nothing  but  degrees  to 
distinguish  us  from  brutes  ; — a  greater  degree 
of  memory,  dearly  purchased  by  the  greater 
solicitudes  of  fear  which  convert  that  memory 
into  foresight.  O  !  place  before  your  eyes  the 
island  of  Britain  in  the  reign  of  Alfred,  its  un- 
pierced  woods,  its  wide  morasses  and  dreary 
heaths,  its  blood-stained  and  desolated  shores, 
its  untaught  and  scanty  population  ;  behold 
the  monarch  listening  now  to  Bede,  and  now 
to  John  Erigena  ;  and  then  see  the  same  realm, 
a  mighty  empire,  full  of  motion,  full  of  books, 
Avhere  the  cotter's  son,  twelve  years  old,  has 
read  more  than  archbishops  of  yore,  and  pos- 
sesses the  opportunity  of  reading  more  than  our 
Alfred  himself; — and  then  finally  behold  this 
mighty  nation,  its  rulers  and  its  wise  men  lis- 
tening to Paley  and  to Malthus  !  It 

is  mournful,  mournful. 


OMNIANA.  349 


INCONSISTENCY. 

How  strange  and  sad  is  the  laxity  with  which 
men  in  these  days  suffer  the  most  inconsistent 
opinions  to  lie  jumbled  lazily  together  in  their 
minds, — holding  the  antimoralism  of  Paley  and 
the  hypophysics  of  Locke,  and  yet  gravely,  and 
with  a  mock  faith,  talking  of  God  as  a  pure 
spirit,  of  passing  out  of  time  into  eternity,  of  a 
peace  which  passes  all  understanding,  of  loving 
our  neighbour  as  ourselves,  and  God  above  all, 
and  so  forth  ! — Blank  contradictions  ! — What 
are  these  men's  minds  but  a  huge  lumber- 
room  of  hilly,  that  is,  of  incompatible  notions 
brought  together  by  a  feeling  without  a  sense 
of  connection  ? 


HOPE  IN  HUMANITY. 

Consider  the  state  of  a  rich  man  perfectly 
Adam  Smithed,  yet  with  a  naturally  good 
heart ; — then  suppose  him  suddenly  convinced, 
vitally  convinced,  of  the  truth  of  the  blessed 
system  of  hope  and  confidence  in  reason  and 
humanity !  Contrast  his  new  and  old  views 
and  reflections,  the  feelings  with  which  he 
would  begin  to  receive  his  rents,  and  to  con- 
template his  increase  of  power  by  wealth,  the 
study  to  relieve  the  labour  of  man  from  all 


350  OMNI  ANA. 

mere  annoy  and  disgust,  the  preclusion  in  liis 
own  mind  of  all  cooling  down  from  the  expe- 
rience of  individual  ingratitude,  and  his  con- 
viction that  the  true  cause  of  all  his  disappoint- 
ments was,  that  his  plans  were  too  narrow,  too 
short,  too  selfish ! 

Wenn  das  Elend  viel  ist  aiif  der  Erde,  so 
beruhet  der  gnind  davou,  nach  Abzug  des  theils 
ertr'dglichen,  theils  verbesserlichen,  theils  einge- 
bildeten  Uebels  der  Naturivelt,  ganz  allein  in 
den  moralischen  Haiidlimgen  der  Menschen* 
O  my  God !  What  a  great,  inspiriting,  heroic 
thought !  Were  only  a  hundred  men  to  com- 
bine even  my  clearness  of  conviction  of  this, 
with  a  Clarkson  and  Bell's  perseverance, 
what  might  not  be  done !  How  awful  a  duty 
does  not  hope  become !  What  a  nurse,  yea, 
mother  of  all  other  the  fairest  virtues!  We 
despair  of  others'  goodness,  and  thence  are  our- 
selves bad.  O  !  let  me  live  to  show  the  errors 
of  the  most  of  those  who  have  hitherto  attempt- 
ed this  work, — how  they  have  too  often  put  the 
intellectual  and  the  moral,  yea,  the  moral  and 
the  religious,  faculties  at  strife  with  each  other, 
and  how  they  ought  to  act  with  an  equal  eye 
to  all,  to  feel  that  all  is  involved  in  the  perfec- 
tion of  each  !  This  is  the  fundamental  position. 

*  Although  the  misery  on  the  earth  is  great  indeed,  yet  the 
foundation  of  it  rests,  after  deduction  of  the  partly  bearable, 
partly  removable,  and  partly  imaginary,  evil  of  the  natural 
world,  entirely  and  alone  on  the  moral  dealings  of  men.    Ed. 


OMNIANA.  351 


SELF-LOVE  IN  RELIGION. 

The  unselfishness  of  self-love  in  the  hopes  and 
fears  of  religion  consists ;— first, — in  the  pre- 
vious necessity  of  a  moral  energy,  in  order  so 
far  to  subjugate  the  sensual,  which  is  indeed 
and  properly  the  selfish,  part  of  our  nature,  as 
to  believe  in  a  state  after  death,  on  the  grounds 
of  the  Christian  religion  : — secondly, — in  the 
abstract  and,  as  it  were,  unindividual  nature  of 
the  idea,  self,  or  soul,  when  conceived  apart 
from  our  present  living  body  and  the  world  of 
the  senses.  In  my  religious  meditations  of 
hope  and  fear,  the  reflection  that  this  course  of 
action  will  purchase  heaven  for  me,  for  my 
soul,  involves  a  thought  of  and  for  all  men  who 
pursue  the  same  course.  In  worldly  blessings, 
such  as  those  promised  in  the  Old  Law,  each 
man  might  make  up  to  himself  his  own  favou- 
rite scheme  of  happiness.  "  I  will  be  strictly 
just,  and  observe  all  the  laws  and  ceremonies 
of  my  religion,  that  God  may  grant  me  such  a 
woman  for  my  wife,  or  wealth  and  honour, 
with  which  I  will  purchase  such  and  such  an 
estate,"  &c.  But  the  reward  of  heaven  admits 
no  day-dreams ;  its  hopes  and  its  fears  are  too 
vast  to  endure  an  outline.  "  I  will  endeavour 
to  abstain  from  vice,  and  force  myself  to  do 
such  and  such  acts  of  duty,  in  order  that  I  may 
make  my«elf  capable  of  that  freedom  of  moral 


352  OMNIANA. 

being,  without  which  heaven  would  be  no 
heaven  to  me."  Now  this  very  thought  tends 
to  annihilate  self.  For  what  is  a  self  not  dis- 
tinguished from  any  other  self,  but  like  an  in- 
dividual circle  in  geometry,  uncoloured,  and 
the  representative  of  all  other  circles.  The 
circle  is  differenced,  indeed,  from  a  triangle  or 
square;  so  is  a  virtuous  soul  from  a  vicious 
soul,  a  soul  in  bliss  from  a  soul  in  misery,  but 
no  wise  distinguished  from  other  souls  under 
the  same  predicament.  That  selfishness  whicli 
includes,  of  necessity,  the  selves  of  all  my 
fellow-creatures,  is  assuredly  a  social  and  gene- 
rous principle.  I  speak,  as  before  observed, 
of  the  objective  or  reflex  self; — for  as  to  the 
subjective  self,  it  is  merely  synonymous  with 
consciousness,  and  obtains  equally  whether  I 
think  of  me  or  of  him ; — in  both  cases  it  is  I 
thinking. 

Still,  however,  I  freely  admit  that  there  nei- 
ther is,  nor  can  be,  any  such  self-oblivion  in 
these  hopes  and  fears  when  practically  re- 
flected on,  as  often  takes  place  in  love  and  acts 
of  loving  kindness,  and  the  habit  of  which  con- 
stitutes a  sweet  and  loving  nature.  And  this 
leads  me  to  the  third,  and  most  important  reflec- 
tion, namely,  that  the  soul's  infinite  capacity  of 
pain  and  of  joy,  through  an  infinite  duration, 
does  really,  on  the  most  high-flying  notions  of 
love  and  justice,  make  my  own  soul  and  the 
most  anxious  care  for  the  character  of  its 
future  fate,  an  object  of  emphatic  duty.    What 


OMNI  AN  A.  353 

can  be  the  object  of  human  virtue  but  tlie 
happiness  of  sentient,  still  more  of  moral, 
beings  ?  But  an  infinite  duration  of  faculties, 
infinite  in  progression,  even  of  one  soul,  is  so 
vast,  so  boundless  an  idea,  that  we  are  unable 
to  distinguish  it  from  the  idea  of  the  whole 
race  of  mankind.  If  to  seek  the  temporal 
welfare  of  all  mankind  be  disinterested  virtue, 
much  more  must  the  eternal  welfare  of  my 
own  soul  be  so  ; — for  the  temporal  welfare  of 
all  mankind  is  included  within  a  finite  space 
and  finite  number,  and  my  imagination  makes 
it  easy  by  sympathies  and  visions  of  outward 
resemblance ;  but  myself  in  eternity,  as  the 
object  of  my  contemplation,  differs  unimagi- 
nably from  my  present  self.  Do  but  try  to 
think  of  yourself  in  eternal  misery  ! — you  will 
find  that  you  are  stricken  with  horror  for  it, 
even  as  for  a  third  person ;  conceive  it  in  ha- 
zard thereof,  and  you  will  feel  commiseration 
for  it,  and  pray  for  it  with  an  anguish  of  sym- 
pathy very  different  from  the  outcry  of  an 
immediate  self-suffering. 

Blessed  be  God !  that  which  makes  us  ca- 
pable of  vicious  self-interestedness,  capacitates 
us  also  for  disinterestedness.  That  I  am  ca- 
pable of  preferring  a  smaller  advantage  of  my 
own  to  a  far  greater  good  of  another  man, — 
this,  the  power  of  comparing  the  notions  of 
*'  him  and  me"  objectively,  enables  me  like- 
wise to  prefer — at  least  furnishes  the  condition 
of  my  preferring — a  greater  good  of  another  to 

VOL.  I.  A  A 


354  OMNIANA. 

a  lesser  good  of  my  own  ; — nay,  a  pleasure  of 
his,  or  external  advantage,  to  an  equal  one  of 
my  own.  And  thus  too,  that  I  am  capable  of 
loving  my  neighbour  as  myself,  empowers  me 
to  love  myself  as  my  neighbour, — not  only  as 
much,  but  in  the  same  way  and  with  the  very 
same  feeling. 

This  is  the  great  privilege  of  pure  religion. 
By  diverting  self-love  to  our  self  under  those 
relations,  in  which  alone  it  is  worthy  of  our 
anxiety,  it  annihilates  self,  as  a  notion  of  diver- 
sity. Extremes  meet.  These  reflections  sup- 
ply a  forcible,  and,  I  believe,  quite  new  argu- 
ment against  the  purgatory,  both  of  the  Ro- 
manists, and  of  the  modern  Millennarians,  and 
final  Salvationists.  Their  motives  do,  indeed, 
destroy  the  essence  of  virtue. 

The  doctors  of  self-love  are  misled  by  a 
wrong  use  of  the  words, — "  We  love  ourselves  !" 
Now  this  is  impossible  for  a  finite  and  created 
being  in  the  absolute  meaning  of  self;  and  in 
its  secondary  and  figurative  meaning,  self  sig- 
nifies only  a  less  degree  of  distance,  a  narrow- 
ness of  moral  view,  and  a  determination  of 
value  by  measurement.  Hence  the  body  is  in 
this  sense  our  self,  because  the  sensations  have 
been  habitually  appropriated  to  it  in  too  great 
a  proportion  ;  but  this  is  not  a  necessity  of  our 
nature.  There  is  a  state  possible  even  in  this 
life,  in  which  we  may  truly  say,  "  My  self 
loves," — freely  constituting  its  secondary  or 
objective  love  in  what  it  wills  to  love,  com- 


OMNI  ANA.  355 

mands  what  it  wills,  and  wills  what  it  com- 
mands. The  difference  between  self-love,  and 
self  that  loves,  consists  in  the  objects  of  the 
former  as  given  to  it  according  to  the  law  of 
the  senses,  while  the  latter  determines  the  ob- 
jects according  to  the  law  in  the  spirit.  The 
first  loves  because  it  must ;  the  second,  because 
it  ought ;  and  the  result  of  the  first  is  not  in 
any  objective,  imaginable,  comprehensible,  ac- 
tion, but  in  that  action  by  which  it  abandoned 
its  power  of  true  agency,  and  willed  its  own 
fall.  This  is,  indeed,  a  mystery.  How  can  it 
be  otherwise  ? — For  if  the  will  be  unconditional, 
it  must  be  inexplicable,  the  understanding 
of  a  thing  being  an  insight  into  its  conditions 
and  causes.  But  whatever  is  in  the  will  is  the 
will,  and  must  therefore  be  equally  inexpli- 
cable. 

In  a  word,  the  difference  of  an  unselfish 
from  a  selfish  love,  even  in  this  life,  consists 
in  this,  that  the  latter  depends  on  our  trans- 
ferring our  present  passion  or  appetite,  or  ra- 
ther on  our  dilating  and  stretching  it  out  in 
imagination,  as  the  covetous  man  does  ; — while 
in  the  former  we  carry  ourselves  forward  un- 
der a  very  different  state  from  the  present,  as 
the  young  man,  who  restrains  his  appetites  in 
respect  of  his  future  self  as  a  tranquil  and 
healthy  old  man.  This  last  requires  as  great 
an  effort  of  disinterestedness  as,  if  not  a  greater 
than,  to  give  up  a  present  enjoyment  to  another 
person  who  is  present  to  us.     The  alienation 


35G 


OMNIANA. 


from  distance  in  time  and  from  diversity  of 
circumstance,  is  greater  in  the  one  case  than 
in  the  other.  And  let  it  be  remembered,  that 
a  Christian  may  exert  all  the  virtues  and  vir- 
tuous charities  of  humanity  in  any  state  ;  yea, 
in  the  pan^s  of  a  wounded  conscience,  he  may 
feel  for  the  future  periods  of  his  own  lost  spirit, 
just  as  Adam  for  all  his  posterity. 

O  magical,  sympathetic,  anima  !  principium 
hylarcliicum!  rationes  spermaticce !  Xoyoi  ttou^tikoi! 
O  formidable  words  !  And  O  man  !  thou  mar- 
vellous beast-angel !  thou  ambitious  beggar  ! 
How  pompously  dost  thou  trick  out  thy  very 
ignorance  with  such  glorious  disguises,  that 
thou  may  est  seem  to  hide  it  in  order  only  to 
worship  it ! 


LIMITATION  OF  LOVE  OF  POETRY. 

A  MAN  may  be,  perhaps,  exclusively  a  poet,  a 
poet  Inost  exquisite  in  his  kind,  though  the 
kind  must  needs  be  of  inferior  worth ;  I  say, 
may  be  ;  for  I  cannot  recollect  any  one  instance 
in  which  I  have  a  right  to  suppose  it.  But, 
surely,  to  have  an  exclusive  pleasure  in  poetry, 
not  being  yourself  a  poet; — to  turn  away  from 
all  effort,  and  to  dwell  wholly  on  the  images  of 
another's  vision, — is  an  unworthy  and  effemi- 
nate thing.  A  jeweller  may  devote  his  whole 
time  to  jewels  unblamed  ;  but  the  mere  ama- 
teur, who  grounds  his  taste  on  no  chemical  or 


OMNI  AN  A.  357 

geological  idea,  cannot  claim  the  same  exemp- 
tion from  despect.  How  shall  he  fully  enjoy 
Wordsworth,  who  has  never  meditated  on  the 
truths  which  Wordsworth  has  wedded  to  im- 
mortal verse  ? 


HUMILITY  OF  THE  AMIABLE. 

It  is  well  ordered  by  nature,  that  the  amiable 
and  estimable  have  a  fainter  perception  of 
their  own  qualities  than  their  friends  have ; — 
otherwise  they  would  love  themselves.  And 
though  they  may  fear  flattery,  yet  if  not  jus- 
tified in  suspecting  intentional  deceit,  they 
cannot  but  love  and  esteem  those  who  love  and 
esteem  them,  only  as  lovely  and  estimable,  and 
give  them  proof  of  their  having  done  well, 
where  they  have  meant  to  do  well. 


TEMPER  IN  ARGUMENT. 

All  reasoners  ought  to  be  perfectly  dispassionate,  and  ready 
to  allow  all  the  force  of  the  arguments,  they  are  to  confute. 
But  more  especially  those,  who  are  to  argue  in  behalf  of  Chris- 
tianity, ought  carefully  to  preserve  the  spirit  of  it  in  their  man- 
ner of  expressing  themselves,  I  have  so  much  honour  for  the 
Christian  clergy,  that  I  had  much  rather  hear  them  railed  at, 
than  hear  them  rail ;  and  I  must  say,  that  I  am  often  griev- 
ously offended  with  the  generality  of  them  for  their  method 
of  treating  all  who  differ  from  them  in  opinion. 

Mrs.  Chapone. 

Besides,  what  is  the  use  of  violence  ?    None. 


358  OMNIANA. 

What  is  the  harm  ?  Great,  very  great ; — chief- 
ly, in  the  confirmation  of  error,  to  which  no- 
thing so  much  tends,  as  to  find  your  opinions 
attacked  with  weak  arguments  and  unworthy 
feelings.  A  generous  mind  becomes  more  at- 
tached to  principles  so  treated,  even  as  it 
would  to  an  old  friend,  after  he  had  been  gross- 
ly calumniated.  We  are  eager  to  make  com- 
pensation. 


PATRIARCHAL  GOVERNMENT. 

The  smooth  words  used  by  all  factions,  and 
their  wide  influence,  may  be  exemplified  in  all 
the  extreme  systems,  as  for  instance  in  the 
patriarchal  government  of  Filmer.  Take  it  in 
one  relation,  and  it  imports  love,  tender  anxiety, 
longer  experience,  and  superior  wisdom,  border- 
ing on  revelation,  especially  to  Jews  and 
Christians,  who  are  in  the  life-long  habit  of 
attaching  to  patriarchs  an  intimacy  with  the 
Supreme  Being.  Take  it  on  the  other  side, 
and  it  imports,  that  a  whole  people  are  to  be 
treated  and  governed  as  children  by  a  man 
not  so  old  as  very  many,  not  older  than  very 
many,  and  in  all  probability  not  wiser  than 
the  many,  and  by  his  very  situation  precluded 
from  the  same  experience. 


OMNIANA.  359 


CALLOUS  SELF-CONCEIT. 

The  most  hateful  form  of  self-conceit  is  the 
callous  form,  when  it  boasts  and  swells  up  on 
the  score  of  its  own  ignorance,  as  implying  ex- 
emption from  a  folly.  "  We  profess  not  to 
understand  ;" — "  We  are  so  unhappy  as  to  be 
quite  in  the  dark  as  to  the  meaning  of  this 
writer  ;" — "  All  this  may  be  very  fine,  but  we 
are  not  ashamed  to  confess  that  to  us  it  is 
quite  unintelligible:" — then  quote  a  passage 
without  the  context,  and  appeal  to  the  Public, 
whether  they  understand  it  or  not ! — Wretches ! 
Such  books  were  not  written  for  your  public. 
If  it  be  a  work  on  inward  religion,  appeal  to 
the  inwardly  religious,  and  ask  them ! — If  it  be 
of  true  love  and  its  anguish  and  its  yearnings, 
appeal  to  the  true  lover  !  What  have  the  public 
to  do  with  this  ? 


A  LIBRARIAN. 


He  was  like  a  cork,  flexible,  floating,  full  of 
pores  and  openings,  and  yet  he  could  neither 
return  nor  transmit  the  waters  of  Helicon,  much 
less  the  light  of  Apollo.  The  poet,  by  his  side, 
was  like  a  diamond,  transmitting  to  all  around, 
yet  retaining  for  himself  alone,  the  rays  of  the 
god  of  day. 


360  OMNI  AN  A, 


TRIMMING. 

An  upright  shoe  may  fit  both  feet ;  but  never 
saw  I  a  glove  that  would  fit  both  hands.  It  is 
a  man  for  a  mean  or  mechanic  office,  that  can 
be  employed  equally  well  under  either  of  two 
opposite  parties. 


DEATH. 

Death  but  supplies  the  oil  for  the  inextin- 
guishable lamp  of  life. 


LOVE  AN  ACT  OF  THE  WILL. 

Love,  however  sudden,  as  when  we  fall  in  love 
at  first  sight,  (which  is,  perhaps,  always  the 
case  of  love  in  its  highest  sense,)  is  yet  an  act 
of  the  will,  and  that  too  one  of  its  primary,  and 
therefore  ineffable  acts.  This  is  most  impor- 
tant ;  for  if  it  be  not  true,  either  love  itself  is 
all  a  romantic  hum,  a  mere  connection  of  de- 
sire with  a  form  appropriated  to  excite  and 
gratify  it,  or  the  mere  repetition  of  a  day- 
dream ; — or  if  it  be  granted  that  love  has  a 
real,  distinct,  and  excellent  being,  I  know  not 
how  we  could  attach  blame  and  immorality  to 
inconstancy,  when  confined  to  the  affections 


OMMANA.  361 

and  a  sense  of  preference.  Either,  therefore, 
we  must  brutalize  our  notions  with  Pope  :  — 

Lust,  thro'  some  certain  strainers  well  refin'd, 
Is  gentle  love  and  charms  all  woman-kind : 

or  we  must  dissolve  and  thaw  away  all  bonds 
of  morality  by  the  irresistible  shocks  of  an 
irresistible  sensibility  with  Sterne. 


WEDDED  UNION. 

The  well-spring  of  all  sensible  communion  is 
the  natural  delight  and  need,  which  unde- 
praved  man  hath  to  transfuse  from  himself 
into  others,  and  to  receive  from  others  into 
himself,  those  things,  wherein  the  excellency 
of  his  kind  doth  most  consist ;  and  the  emi- 
nence of  love  or  marriage  communion  is,  that 
this  mutual  transfusion  can  take  place  more 
perfectly  and  totally  in  this,  than  in  any  other 
mode. 

Prefer  person  before  money,  good-temper 
with  good  sense  before  person ;  and  let  all, 
wealth,  easy  temper,  strong  understanding  and 
beauty,  be  as  nothing  to  thee,  unless  accompa- 
nied by  virtue  in  principle  and  in  habit. 

Suppose  competence,  health,  and  honesty ; 
then  a  happy  marriage  depends  on  four  things  : 
— 1.  An  understanding  proportionate  to  thine, 
that  is,  a  recipiency  at  least  of  thine : — 2.  na- 


362  UMNIANA. 

tural  sensibility  and  lively  sympathy  in  gene- 
ral : — 3.  steadiness  in  attaching  and  retaining 
sensibility  to  its  proper  objects  in  its  proper 
proportions  : — 4.  mutual  liking  ;  including  per- 
son and  all  the  thousand  obscure  sympathies 
that  determine  conjugal  liking,  that  is,  love 
and  desire  to  A.  rather  than  to  B.  This  seems 
very  obvious  and  almost  trivial :  and  yet  all 
unhappy  marriages  arise  from  the  not  honestly 
putting,  and  sincerely  answering  each  of  these 
four  questions :  any  one  of  them  negatived,  mar- 
riage is  imperfect,  and  in  hazard  of  discontent. 


DIFFERENCE  BETWEEN  HOBBES  AND  SPINOSA. 

In  the  most  similar  and  nearest  points  there  is 
a  difference,  but  for  the  most  part  there  is  an 
absolute  contrast,  between  Hobbes  and  Spi- 
nosa.  Thus  Hobbes  makes  a  state  of  war  the 
natural  state  of  man  from  the  essential  and 
ever  continuing  nature  of  man,  as  not  a  moral, 
but  only  a  frightenable,  being :—Spinosa  makes 
the  same  state  a  necessity  of  man  out  of  soci- 
ety, because  he  must  then  be  an  undeveloped 
man,  and  his  moral  being  dormant;  and  so  on 
through  the  whole. 


OMNIANA.  363 


THE  END  MAY  JUSTIFY  THE  MEANS. 

Whatever  act  is  necessary  to  an  end,  and  as- 
certained to  be  necessary  and  proportionate 
both  to  the  end  and  the  agent,  takes  its  nature 
from  that  end.  This  premised,  the  proposition 
is  innocent  that  ends  may  justify  means.  Re- 
member, however,  the  important  distinction  : — 
TJniusfacti  cliversi  fines  esse  possimt :  unius  ac- 
tionis  non  possimt. 

I  have  somewhere  read  this  remark  : — Omne 
meritum  est  voluntaritim,  aut  voluntate  originis, 
aut  origine  voluntatis.  Quaintly  as  this  is  ex- 
pressed, it  is  well  worth  consideration,  and 
gives  the  true  meaning  of  Baxter's  famous 
saying, — "  Hell  is  paved  with  good  intentions." 


NEGATIVE  THOUGHT. 

On  this  calm  morning  of  the  13th  of  Novem- 
ber, 1 809,  it  occurs  to  me,  that  it  is  by  a  nega- 
tion and  voluntary  act  of  no  thinking  that  we 
think  of  earth,  air,  water,  &c.  as  dead.  It  is 
necessary  for  our  limited  powers  of  conscious- 
ness, that  we  should  be  brought  to  this  negative 
state,  and  that  this  state  should  pass  into  custom ; 
but  it  is  likewise  necessary  that  at  times  we 
should  awake  and  step  forward ;  and  this  is 
effected  by  those  extenders  of  our  conscious- 


364  OMNIANA. 

ness — sorrow;  sickness,  poetry,  and  religion. 
The  truth  is,  we  stop  in  the  sense  of  life  just 
when  we  are  not  forced  to  go  on,  and  then 
adopt  a  permission  of  our  feelings  for  a  precept 
of  our  reason. 


MAN'S  RETURN  TO  HEAVEN. 

Heaven  bestows  light  and  influence  on  this 
lower  world,  which  reflects  the  blessed  rays, 
though  it  cannot  recompense  them.  So  man 
may  make  a  return  to  God,  but  no  requital. 


YOUNG  PRODIGIES. 

Fair  criticism  on  young  prodigies  and  Ros- 
ciuses  in  verse,  or  on  the  stage,  is  arraigned, — 

as  the  envious  sneaping  frost 
That  bites  the  first-born  infants  of  the  spring. 

If  there  were  no  better  answer,  the  following  a 
good  heart  would  scarcely  admit ; — but  where 
nine-tenths  of  the  applause  have  been  mere 
wonderment  and  miracle-lust  (Wundursucht) 
these  verses  are  an  excellent  accompaniment 
to  other  arguments : — 

Well,  say  it  be  ! — Yet  why  of  summer  boast, 
Before  the  birds  have  natural  cause  to  sing? 
Why  should  we  joy  in  an  abortive  birth  ? 


OMNI  ANA.  365 

At  Christmas  I  no  more  desire  a  rose,  • 

Than  wish  a  snow  in  May's  new  budding  shows ; 

But  like  of  each  thing  that  in  reason  grows. 

Loves  Labour  s  Lost.*' 


WELCH  NAMES. 

The  small  number  of  surnames,  and  those 
Christian  names  and  patronymics,  not  derived 
from  trades,  &c.  is  one  mark  of  a  country 
either  not  yet,  or  only  recently,  unfeudalized. 
Hence  in  Scotland  the  Mackintoshes,  Macau- 
lays,  and  so  on.  But  the  most  remarkable 
show  of  this  I  ever  saw,  is  the  list  of  subscri- 
bers to  Owen's  Welch  Dictionary.  In  letter 
D.  there  are  31  names,  21  of  which  are  Davis 
or  Davies,  and  the  other  three  are  not  Welch- 
men.  In  E.  there  are  30;  10  Evans;  6  Ed- 
tcards ;  1  Edmonds ;  1  Egan,  and  the  remain- 
der Ellis.  In  G.  two-thirds  are  Griffiths.  In 
H.  all  are  Hughes  and  Howell.  In  I.  there  are 
Q(j ;  all  Jonesses.  In  L.  3  or  4  Leivises ;  1 
Eewellyn;  all  the  rest  Lloyds.  M,  four-fifths 
Morgans.  O.  entirely  Owen.  R.  all  Roberts 
or  Richards.  T.  all  Thomases.  V.  all  Vaugh- 
ans; — and  W.  64  names,  5(S  of  them  Williams. 

*  Slightly  altered.     Ed. 


36G  OMNIANA. 


GERMAN  LANGUAGE. 

The  real  value  of  melody  in  a  language  is  con- 
siderable as  subadditive  ;  but  when  not  j  utting 
out  into  consciousness  under  the  friction  of 
comparison,  the  absence  or  inferiority  of  it  is, 
as  privative  of  pleasure,  of  little  consequence. 
For  example,  when  I  read  Voss's  translation 
of  the  Georgics,  I  am,  as  it  were,  reading  the 
original  poem,  until  something  particularly 
well  expressed  occasions  me  to  revert  to  the 
Latin ;  and  then  I  find  the  superiority,  or  at 
least  the  powers,  of  the  German  in  all  other 
respects,  but  am  made  feelingly  alive,  at  the 
same  time,  to  its  unsmooth  mixture  of  the 
vocal  and  the  organic,  the  fluid  and  the  sub- 
stance, of  language.  The  fluid  seems  to  have 
been  poured  in  on  the  corpuscles  all  at  once, 
and  the  whole  has,  therefore,  curdled,  and  col- 
lected itself  into  a  lumpy  soup  full  of  knots  of 
curds  inisled  by  interjacent  whey  at  irregular 
distances,  and  the  curd  lumpets  of  various 
sizes. 

It  is  always  a  question  how  far  the  apparent 
defects  of  a  language  arise  from  itself  or  from 
the  false  taste  of  the  nation  speaking  it.  Is 
the  practical  inferiority  of  the  English  to  the 
Italian  in  the  power  of  passing  from  grave  to 
light  subjects,  in  the  manner  of  Ariosto,  the 


OMNIANA.  367 

fault  of  the  language  itself?  Wieland  in  his 
Oberon,  broke  successfully  through  equal  dif- 
ficulties. It  is  grievous  to  think  how  much 
less  careful  the  English  have  been  to  preserve 
than  to  acquire.  Why  have  we  lost,  or  all  but 
lost,  the  ver  ov  for  as  a  prefix, — -fordone,  for- 
wearied,  &c. ;  and  the  zer  or  to, — zerreisseii,  to- 
rend,  &c.  Jugend,  Jihigling :  youth,  youngling ; 
why  is  that  last  word  now  lost  to  common  use, 
and  confined  to  sheep  and  other  animals  ? 


'Ev  rw  (jjpoveiy  fjirj^EV  rj^ierroe  fiiog.      Soph. 

His  life  was  playful  from  infancy  to  death, 
like  the  snow  which  in  a  calm  day  falls,  but 
scarce  seems  to  fall,  and  plays  and  dances  in 
and  out  till  the  very  moment  that  it  gently 
reaches  the  earth. 


THE  UNIVERSE. 

It  surely  is  not  impossible  that  to  some  infi- 
nitely superior  being  the  whole  universe  may 
be  as  one  plain,  the  distance  between  planet 
and  planet  being  only  as  the  pores  in  a  grain 
of  sand,  and  the  spaces  between  system  and 
system  no  greater  than  the  intervals  between 
one  grain  and  the  grain  adjacent. 


3G8  OMNIANA. 


HARBEROUS. 

HarbcroKs,  that  is,  harbourous,  is  the  old  ver- 
sion of  St.  Paul's  (piXo^tvoQ,  and  a  beautiful 
word  it  is.  Koa/niog  should  be  rendered  a  gen- 
tleman in  dress  and  address,  in  appearance  and 
demeanour,  a  man  of  the  world  in  an  innocent 
sense.  The  Latin  mimduslms  the  same  double 
force  in  it ;  only  that  to  the  rude  early  Ro- 
mans, to  have  a  clean  pair  of  hands  and  a 
clean  dress,  was  to  be  drest ;  just  as  we  say  to 
boys,  "  Put  on  your  clean  clothes!" 

The  different  meanings  attached  to  the  same 
word  or  phrase  in  different  sentences,  will, 
of  course,  be  accompanied  with  a  different 
feeling  in  the  mind  ;  this  will  affect  the  pro- 
nunciation, and  hence  arises  a  new  word.  We 
should  vainly  try  to  produce  the  same  feeling  in 
our  minds  by  a7id  he  as  by  tuho;  for  the  diffe- 
rent use  of  the  latter,  and  its  feeling  having  now 
coalesced.  Yet  tvho  is  properly  the  same  word 
and  pronunciation,  as  o  with  the  digammate 
prefix,  and  as  qui  Kal  o. 


AN  ADMONITION. 

There  are  two  sides  to  every  question.  If 
thou  hast  genius  and  poverty  to  thy  lot,  dwell 
on  the  foolish,  f)erplexing,  imprudent,  dange- 
rous, and  even  immoral,  conduct  of  promise- 


OMNIANA.  369 

breach  in  small  things,  of  want  of  punctuality, 
of  procrastination  in  all  its  shapes  and  dis- 
guises. Force  men  to  reverence  the  dignity  of 
thy  moral  strength  in  and  for  itself, — seeking 
no  excuses  or  palliations  from  fortune,  or  sick- 
ness, or  a  too  full  mind  that,  in  opulence  of  con- 
ception, overrated  its  powers  of  application. 
But  if  thy  fate  should  be  different,  shouldest 
thou  possess  competence,  health  and  ease  of 
mind,  and  then  be  thyself  called  upon  to  judge 
such  faults  in  another  so  gifted, — O  !  then, 
upon  the  other  view  of  the  question,  say,  Am  I 
in  ease  and  comfort,  and  dare  I  wonder  that  he, 
poor  fellow,  acted  so  and  so?  Dare  I  accuse 
him  ?  Ought  I  not  to  shadow  forth  to  myself 
that,  glad  and  luxuriating  in  a  short  escape 
from  anxiety,  his  mind  over-promised  for  itself; 
that,  want  combating  with  his  eager  desire  to 
produce  things  worthy  of  fame,  he  dreamed  of 
the  nobler,  when  he  should  have  been  pro- 
ducing the  meaner,  and  so  had  the  meaner 
obtruded  on  his  moral  being,  when  the  no- 
bler was  making  full  way  on  his  intellectual? 
Think  of  the  manifoldness  of  his  accumulated 
petty  calls !  Think,  in  short,  on  all  that  should 
be  like  a  voice  from  heaven  to  warn  thyself 
against  this  and  this,  and  call  it  all  up  for  pity 
and  for  palliation  ;  and  then  draw  the  balance. 
Take  him  in  his  whole, — his  head,  his  heart, 
his  wishes,  his  innocence  of  all  selfish  crime, 
and  a  hundred  years  hence,  what  will  be  the 
result  ?  The  good, — were  it  but  a  single  volume 

VOL.  I.  B  B 


370  OMNIANA. 

It 

that  made  truth  more  visible,  and  goodness 
more  lovely,  and  pleasure  at  once  more  akin 
to  virtue  and,  self- doubled,  more  pleasurable ! 
and  the  evil, — while  he  lived,  it  injured  none 
but  himself;  and  where  is  it  now?  in  his  grave. 
Follow  it  not  thither. 


TO  THEE  CHERUBIM  AND  SERAPHIM 
CONTINUALLY  DO  CRY. 

The  mighty  kingdoms  angelical,  like  the  thin 
clouds  at  dawn,  receiving  and  hailing  the  first 
radiance,  and  singing  and  sounding  forth  their 
blessedness,  increase  the  rising  joy  in  the  heart 
of  God,  spread  wide  and  utter  forth  the  joy 
arisen,  and  in  innumerable  finite  glories  inter- 
pret all  they  can  of  infinite  bliss. 


DEFINITION  OF  MIRACLE. 

A  phjEnomenon  in  no  connection  with  any 
other  phaenomenon,  as  its  immediate  cause,  is 
a  miracle ;  and  what  is  believed  to  have  been 
such,  is  miraculous  for  the  person  so  believing. 
When  it  is  strange  and  surprising,  that  is,  with- 
out any  analogy  in  our  former  experience — it 
is  called  a  miracle.  The  kind  defines  the 
thing : — the  circumstances  the  word. 

To  stretch  out  my  arm  is  a  miracle,  unless 
the  materialists  should  be  more  cunning  than 


OMNIANA.  371 

they  have  proved  themselves  hitherto.  To 
reanimate  a  dead  man  by  an  act  of  the  will, 
no  intermediate  agency  employed,  not  only  is, 
but  is  called,  a  miracle.  A  scripture  miracle, 
therefore,  must  be  so  defined,  as  to  express, 
not  only  its  miracular  essence,  but  likewise  the 
condition  of  its  appearing  miraculous ;  add 
therefore  to  the  preceding,  the  words  prcEter 
omnem  prio?'em  experieutiam. 

It  might  be  defined  likewise  an  effect,  not 
having  its  cause  in  any  thing  congenerous. 
That  thought  calls  up  thought  is  no  more  mira- 
culous than  that  a  billiard  ball  moves  a  billiard 
ball ;  but  that  a  billiard  ball  should  excite  a 
thought,  that  is,  be  perceived,  is  a  miracle,  and, 
were  it  strange,  would  be  called  such.  For 
take  the  converse,  that  a  thought  should  call  up 
a  billiard  ball !  Yet  where  is  the  difference, 
but  that  the  one  is  a  common  experience,  the 
other  never  yet  experienced  ? 

It  is  not  strictly  accurate  to  affirm,  that 
every  thing  would  appear  a  miracle,  if  we  were 
wholly  uninfluenced  by  custom,  and  saw  things 
as  they  are  : — for  then  the  very  ground  of  all 
miracles  would  probably  vanish,  namely,  the 
heterogeneity  of  spirit  and  matter.  For  the 
quid  ulterius  ?  of  wonder,  we  should  have  the 
ne  plus  ultra  of  adoration. 

Again — the  word  miracle  has  an  objective, 
a  subjective,  and  a  popular  meaning; — as  ob- 
jective,— the  essence  of  a  miracle  consists  in 
the  heterogeneity  of  the  consequent  and  its 


372  OMNIANA. 

causative  antecedent ; — as  subjective, — in  the 
assumption  of  the  heterogeneity.  Add  tlie 
wonder  and  surprise  excited,  when  the  conse- 
quent is  out  of  the  course  of  experience,  and 
we  know  the  popular  sense  and  ordinary  use 
of  the  word. 


DEATH,  AND  GROUNDS  OF  BELIEF  IN  A 
FUTURE  STATE. 

It  is  an  important  thought,  that  death,  judged 
of  by  corporeal  analogies,  certainly  implies 
discerption  or  dissolution  of  parts ;  but  pain 
and  pleasure  do  not ;  nay,  they  seem  incon- 
ceivable except  under  the  idea  of  concentra- 
tion. Therefore  the  influence  of  the  body  on 
the  soul  will  not  prove  the  common  destiny  of 
both.  I  feel  myself  not  the  slave  of  nature 
(nature  used  here  as  the  mundns  sensihilis)  in 
the  sense  in  which  animals  are.  Not  only  my 
thoughts  and  aft'ections  extend  to  objects  trans- 
natural,  as  truth,  virtue,  God  ;  not  only  do  my 
powers  extend  vastly  beyond  all  those,  which 
I  could  have  derived  from  the  instruments  and 
organs,  with  which  nature  has  furnished  me ; 
but  I  can  do  what  nature  per  se  cannot.  I 
ingraft,  I  raise  heavy  bodies  above  the  clouds, 
and  guide  my  course  over  ocean  and  through 
air.  I  alone  am  lord  of  fire  and  light ;  other 
creatures  are  but  their  alms-folk,  and  of  all  the 
so  called  elements,  water,  earth,  air,  and  all 
their  compounds  (to  speak  in  the  ever-endu- 


OiMNIANA.  373 

ring  language  of  the  senses,  to  which  nothing- 
can  be  revealed,  but  as  compact,  or  fluid,  or 
aerial),  I  not  merely  subserve  myself  of  them, 
but  I  employ  them.  Ergo,  there  is  in  me,  or 
rather  I  am,  a  praeter-natural,  that  is,  a  super- 
sensuous  thing :  but  what  is  not  nature,  why 
should  it  perish  with  nature?  why  lose  the 
faculty  of  vision,  because  my  spectacles  are 
broken  ? 

Now  to  this  it  will  be  objected,  and  very  for- 
cibly too ; — that  the  soul  or  self  is  acted  upon  by 
nature  through  the  body,  and  water  or  caloric, 
diffused  through  or  collected  in  the  brain,  will 
derange  the  faculties  of  the  soul  by  deranging 
the  organization  of  the  brain  ;  the  sword  can- 
not touch  the  soul ;  but  by  rending  the  flesh, 
it  will  rend  the  feelings.  Therefore  the  vio- 
lence of  nature  may,  in  destroying  the  body, 
mediately  destroy  the  soul !  It  is  to  this  objec- 
tion that  my  first  sentence  applies  ;  and  is  an 
important,  and,  I  believe,  a  new  and  the  only 
satisfactory  reply  I  have  ever  heard. 

The  one  great  and  binding  ground  of  the 
belief  of  God  and  a  hereafter,  is  the  law  of  con- 
science :  but  as  the  aptitudes,  and  beauty,  and 
grandeur,  of  the  world,  are  a  sweet  and  benefi- 
cent inducement  to  this  belief,  a  constant  fuel  to 
our  faith,  so  here  we  seek  these  arguments,  not 
as  dissatisfied  with  the  one  main  ground,  not  as 
of  little  faith,  but  because,  believing  it  to  be,  it 
is  natural  we  should  expect  to  find  traces  of  it, 


374  OMNIANA. 


and  as  a  noble  way  of  employing  and  develop- 
ing, and  enlarging  the  faculties  of  the  soul, 
and  this,  not  by  way  of  motive,  but  of  assimi- 
lation, producing  virtue.     2d  April,  1811. 


HATRED  OF  INJUSTICE. 

It  is  the  mark  of  a  noble  nature  to  be  more 
shocked  with  the  unjust  condemnation  of  a  bad 
man  than  of  a  virtuous  one ;  as  in  the  instance 
of  Strafford.  For  in  such  cases  the  love  of 
justice,  and  the  hatred  of  the  contrary,  are  felt 
more  nakedly,  and  constitute  a  strong  passion 
per  se,  not  only  unaided  by,  but  in  conquest  of, 
the  softer  self-repaying  sympathies.  A  wise 
foresight  too  inspires  jealousy,  that  so  may  prin- 
ciples be  most  easily  overthrown.  This  is  the 
virtue  of  a  wise  man,  which  a  mob  never  pos- 
sesses, even  as  a  mob  never,  perhaps,  has  the 
malignant  Jiuis  uUimus,  which  is  the  vice  of 
a  man. 


RELIGION. 

Amonost  the  great  truths  are  these  : — 

I.  That  religion  has  no  speculative  dogmas ; 
that  all  is  practical,  all  appealing  to  the  will, 
and  therefore  all  imperative.  /  am  the  Lord 
thy  God:  Thou  shall  have  none  other  gods 
but  me. 


OMNIANA.  375 

II.  That,  therefore,  miracles  are  not  the 
proofs,  but  the  necessary  results,  of  revelation. 
They  are  not  the  key  of  the  arch  and  roof  of 
evidence,  though  they  may  be  a  compacting 
stone  in  it,  which  gives  while  it  receives 
strength.  Hence,  to  make  the  intellectual  faith 
a  fair  analogon  or  unison  of  the  vital  faith,  it 
ought  to  be  stamped  in  the  mind  by  all  the 
evidences  duly  co-ordinated,  and  not  designed 
by  single  pen-strokes,  beginning  either  here 
or  there. 

III.  That,  according  to  No.  I.,  Christ  is  not 
described  primarily  and  characteristically  as 
a  teacher,  but  as  a  doer ;  a  light  indeed,  but 
an  effective  light,  the  sun  which  causes  what 
it  shows,  as  well  as  shows  what  it  first  causes. 

IV.  That  a  certain  degree  of  morality  is 
presupposed  in  the  reception  of  Christianity  ; 
it  is  the  substratum  of  the  moral  interest  which 
substantiates  the  evidence  of  miracles.  The 
instance  of  a  profligate  suddenly  converted,  if 
l^roperly  sifted,  will  be  found  but  an  apparent 
exception. 

V.  That  the  being  of  a  God,  and  the  immor- 
tality of  man,  are  every  where  assumed  by 
Christ. 

VI.  That  Socinianism  is  not  a  religion,  but 
a  theory,  and  that,  too,  a  very  pernicious,  or  a 
very  unsatisfactory,  theory.  Pernicious, — for 
it  excludes  all  our  deep  and  awful  ideas  of  the 
perfect  holiness  of  God,  his  justice  and  his 
mercy,  and  thereby  makes  the  voice  of  con- 


376  OMNI  AN  A. 

science  a  delusion,  as  having  no  correspondent 
in  the  character  of  the  legislator;  regarding 
God  as  merely  a  good-natured  pleasure-giver, 
so  happiness  be  produced,  indifferent  as  to  the 
means ; — Unsatisfactory,  for  it  promises  for- 
giveness without  any  solution  of  the  difficulty 
of  the  compatibility  of  this  with  the  justice  of 
God  ;  in  no  way  explains  the  fallen  condition 
of  man,  nor  offers  any  means  for  his  regenera- 
tion. "  If  you  will  be  good,  you  will  be 
happy,"  it  says :  that  may  be,  but  my  will  is 
weak  ;  I  sink  in  the  struggle. 

VII.  That  Socinianism  never  did  and  never 
can  subsist  as  a  general  religion.  For  1.  It 
neither  states  the  disease,  on  account  of  which 
the  human  being  hungers  for  revelation,  nor 
prepares  any  remedy  in  general,  nor  ministers 
any  hope  to  the  individual.  2.  In  order  to 
make  itself  endurable  on  scriptural  grounds,  it 
must  so  weaken  the  texts  and  authority  of 
scripture,  as  to  leave  in  scripture  no  binding 
ground  of  proof  of  any  thing.  3.  Take  a  pious 
Jew,  one  of  the  Maccabees,  and  compare  his 
faith  and  its  grounds  with  Priestley's;  and 
then,  for  what  did  Christ  come? 

VIII.  That  Socinianism  involves  the  shock- 
ing thought  that  man  will  not,  and  ought  not 
to  be  expected  to,  do  his  duty  as  man,  unless 
he  first  makes  a  bargain  with  his  Maker,  and 
his  Maker  with  him.  Give  me,  the  individual 
me,  a  positive  proof  that  I  shall  be  in  a  state  of 
pleasure  after  my  death,  if  I  do  so  and  so,  and 


OMNIANA.  377 

then  I  will  do  it,  not  else  !  And  the  proof  asked 
is  not  one  dependent  on,  or  flowing  from,  his 
moral  nature  and  moral  feelings,  but  wholly 
extra-mom],  namely,  by  his  outward  senses, 
the  subjugation  of  which  to  faith,  that  is,  the 
passive  to  the  actional  and  self-created  belief, 
is  the  great  object  of  all  religion  ! 

IX.  That  Socinianism  involves  the  dreadful 
reflection,  that  it  can  establish  its  probability 
(its  certainty  being  wholly  out  of  the  question 
and  impossible,  Priestley  himself  declaring  that 
his  own  continuance  as  a  Christian  depended 
on  a  contingency,)  only  on  the  destruction  of 
all  the  arguments  furnished  for  our  permanent 
and  essential  distinction  from  brutes ;  that  it 
must  prove  that  we  have  no  grounds  to  obey, 
but,  on  the  contrary,  that  in  wisdom  we  ought 
to  reject  and  declare  utterly  null,  all  the  com- 
mands of  conscience,  and  all  that  is  implied  in 
those  commands,  reckless  of  the  confusion  in- 
troduced into  our  notions  of  means  and  ends  by 
the  denial  of  truth,  goodness,  justice,  mercy, 
and  the  other  fundamental  ideas  in  the  idea  of 
God ;  and  all  this  in  order  to  conduct  us  to  a 
Mahomet's  bridge  of  a  knife's  edge,  or  the 
breadth  of  a  spear,  to  salvation.  And,  should 
we  discover  any  new  documents,  or  should  an 
acuter  logician  make  plain  the  sophistry  of  the 
deductions  drawn  from  the  present  documents 
(and  surely  a  man  who  has  passed  from  ortho- 
doxy to  the  loosest  Arminianism,  and  thence  to 
Arianism,  and  thence  to  direct  Humanism,  has 


378  OMNIANA. 

no  right  from  his  experience  to  deny  the  pro- 
bability of  this) — then  to  fall  off  into  the  hope- 
less abyss  of  atheism.  For  the  present  life,  we 
know,  is  governed  by  fixed  laws,  which  the 
atheist  acknowledges  as  well  as  the  theist ;  and 
if  there  be  no  spiritual  world,  and  no  spiritual 
life  in  a  spiritual  world,  what  possible  bearing 
can  the  admission  or  rejection  of  this  hypo- 
thesis have  on  our  practice  or  feelings  ? 

Lastly,  the  Mosaic  dispensation  was  a  scheme 
of  national  education  ;  the  Christian  is  a  world- 
religion  ;  and  the  former  was  susceptible  of 
evidence  and  probabilities  which  do  not,  and 
cannot,  apply  to  the  latter.  A  savage  people 
forced,  as  it  were,  into  a  school  of  circum- 
stances, and  gradually  in  the  course  of  gene- 
rations taught  the  vmity  of  God,  first  and  for 
centuries  merely  as  a  practical  abstinence  from 
the  worship  of  any  other, — how  can  the  prin- 
ciples of  such  a  system  apply  to  Christianity, 
which  goes  into  all  nations  and  to  all  men, 
the  most  enlightened,  even  by  preference? 

Writing  several  years  later  than  the  date  of 
the  preceding  paragraphs,  I  commend  the  mo- 
dern Unitarians  for  their  candour  in  giving  up 
the  possible  worshipability  of  Christ,  if  not 
very  God, — a  proof  that  truth  will  ultimately 
prevail.  The  Arians,  then  existing,  against 
whom  Waterland  wrote,  were  not  converted ; 
but  in  the  next  generation  the  arguments 
made  their  way.  This  is  fame  versus  reputa- 
tion. 


OMNIANA. 


^ 


THE  APOOTLEG'  CREE&T 

not  prfhbn]>]p  from  ^vhnt  js^  found  in 
ri^h<os  of  Cyril,  Eusebius,  Cyprian,  ii'iar 
elliis  oi.  Ancyra  and  others,  that  our  present 
[Apostles'  \^reed  is  not  the  very  Smnbolum 
Fidei,  whicnVwas  not  to  be  written, /but  was 
always  repeated  at  baptism  ?  For  this  Fatter  cer- 
tainly contained\he  doctrine  of  the  eternal  ge 
neration  of  the  Logos  ;  and,  therefore,  it  seem 
likely  that  the  present  Apostles'  creed  was  a 
introductory,  and,  asVit  were,/alphabeticaj, 
creed  for  young  catechimiens  in  their  first  el 
mentation.  Is  it  to  be  beiieved  that  the  Spji 
bolmn  Fidei  contained  notWig  but  the  more 
history  of  Jesus,  without  ajay  of  the  peculiar 
doctrines,  or  that,  if  it  didr  not  contain  sonie- 
thing  more,  the  great  and/vehement  defend  3rs 
of  the  Trinity  would  s^ak  of  m  so  magnifi- 
cently as  they  do,  eveivpreferring  its  author  ty 
to  that  of  the  scriptures? — Beside!^  does  iiot 
Austin  positively  say  that  our  presentM.postl  3s' 
creed  was  gathered  out  of  the  scriptures? 
Whereas  the  Snmholmn  Fidei  was  elde\  tlikn 
the  Gospels,  aiid  probably  contained  onlVthe 
three  doctrhl^s  of  the  Trinity,  the  Redemptt^)n, 
and  the  Jjnity  of  the  Church.  May  it  iV)t 
have  h^pened,  when  baptism  was  admima- 
tere^|/so  early,  and  at  last  even  to  infants,  tiiai 
trhi — iSi/mbvium — Fidni  becailie    gradually 


SSET 


OMNIANA. 


SjufsikiUum,    no    bciug^ippropriatpd-.  to   nduk 
prdseli^tes  from  Judai^iit-oiJ^agaiiism?    Tnia 
/en  mon;  than  pi^^le  ;  for|in\ 
the  nuvority  of  bcrn  oYei:ccn-\ 


W^ns 


t( 


nie  e 
propoittioiixio 


\jerte4)  Christi^Trs-mrrgrjthe  cfBgd-djjyisti-ucti  on 

an  thaTof  "dtKte* 


tjavc  been 
,,ju^i|ession. 


[ofeTreqiient  than 


A  GOOD  HEART. 

There  is  in  Abbt's  Essays  an  attempt  to  de- 
termine the  true  sense  of  this  phrase,  at  least 
to  unfold  (auseinmidersetzen)  what  is  meant  and 
felt  by  it.  I  was  much  pleased  with  the  re- 
marks, I  remember,  and  with  the  counterpo- 
sition  of  Tom  Jones  and  Sir  Charles  Grandi- 
son.  Might  not  Luther  and  Calvin  serve? 
But  it  is  made  less  noticeable  in  these  last  by 
its  cb-existence  with,  and  sometimes  real,  more 
often  apparent,  subordination  to  fixed  con- 
scious principles,  and  is  thus  less  naturally 
characteristic.  Parson  Adams  contrasted  with 
Dr.  Harrison  in  Fielding's  Amelia  would  do. 
Then  there  is  the  suppression  of  the  good 
heart  and  the  substitution  of  principles  or  mo- 
tives for  the  good  heart,  as  in  Laud,  and  the 
whole  race  of  conscientious  persecutors.  Such 
principles  constitute  the  virtues  of  the  Inqui- 
sition. A  good  heart  contrasts  with  the  Pha- 
risaic righteousness.  This  last  contemplation 
of  the  Pharisees,  the  dogmatists,  and  the  rigo- 


OMNIANA.  ^*8^ 

rists  in  toto  genere,  serves  to  reconcile  me  to 
the  fewness  of  the  men  who  act  on  fixed  prin- 
ciples. For  unless  there  exist  intellectual 
power  to  determine  aright  what  are  the  princi- 
pia  jam  fixa  et  formata,  and  unless  there  be 
the  wisdom  of  love  preceding  the  love  of  wis- 
dom, and  unless  to  this  be  added  a  graciousness 
of  nature,  a  loving  kindness, — these  rigorists 
are  but  bigots  often  to  errors,  and  active,  yea, 
remorseless  in  preventing  or  staying  the  rise 
and  progress  of  truth.  And  even  when  bigotted 
adherents  to  true  principles,  yet  they  render 
truth  unamiable,  and  forbid  little  children  to 
come  thereunto.  As  human  nature  now  is, 
it  is  well,  perhaps,  that  the  number  should  be 
few,  seeing  that  of  the  few,  the  greater  part 
are  pre-maturities. 

The  number  of  those  who  act  from  good 
hearted  impulses,  a  kindly  and  cheerful  mood, 
and  the  play  of  minute  sympathies,  continuous 
in  their  discontinuity,  like  the  sand-thread  of 
the  hour-glass,  and  from  their  minuteness  and 
transiency  not  calculated  to  stiffen  or  inflate 
the  individual,  and  thus  remaining  unendan- 
gered  by  egotism,  and  its  unhandsome  vizard 
contempt,  is  far  larger  :  and  though  these  tem- 
peramental j97o-virtues  will  too  often  fail,  and 
are  not  built  to  stand  the  storms  of  strong 
temptation  ;  yet  on  the  whole  they  carry  on 
the  benignant  scheme  of  social  nature,  like  the 
other  instincts  that  rule  the  animal  creation. 
But  of  all  the  most  numerous  are  the  men,  who 


^    / 


JB2  omniana.  . 

have  ever  more  their  own  dearHesl  beloved 
self,  as  the  only  or  main  goal  or  butt  of  their 
endeavours  straight  and  steady  before  their 
eyes,  and  whose  whole  inner  world  turns  on  the 
great  axis  of  self-interest.  These  form  the  ma- 
jority, if  not  of  mankind,  yet  of  those  by  whom 
the  business  of  life  is  carried  on  ;  and  most  ex- 
pedient it  is,  that  so  it  should  be ;  nor  can  we 
imagine  any  thing  better  contrived  for  the  ad- 
vantage of  society.  For  these  are  the  most  in- 
dustrious, orderly,  and  circumspect  portion  of 
society,  and  the  actions  governed  by  this  prin- 
ciple with  the  results,  are  the  only  materials  on 
which  either  the  statesman,  or  individuals  can 
safely  calculate. 

There  is,  indeed,  another  sort,  (a  class  they 
can  scarcely  be  called),  who  are  below  self- 
interest  ;  who  live  under  the  mastery  of  their 
senses  and  appetites  ;  and  whose  selfishness  is 
an  animal  instinct,  a  goad  a  tergo,  not  an  at- 
traction, a  re  prospecta,  or  (so  to  speak)  from  a 
projected  self.  In  fact,  such  individuals  can- 
not so  properly  be  said  to  have  a  self,  as  to  be 
machines  for  the  self  of  nature :  and  are  as 
little  capable  of  loving  themselves  as  of  loving 
their  neighbours.  Such  there  are.  Nay,  (if 
we  were  to  count  only  without  weighing)  the 
aggregate  of  such  persons  might  possibly  form 
a  larger  number  than  the  class  preceding.  But 
they  may  safely  be  taken  up  into  the  latter, 
for  the  main  ends  of  society,  as  being  or  sure 
to  become  its  materials  and  tools.     Their  folly 


OMNIANA. 

is  the  stuff  in  which  the  sound  sense  of  the 
worldly-wise  is  at  once  manifested  and  remu- 
nerated ;  their  idleness  of  thought,  with  the 
passions,  appetites,  likings  and  fancies,  which 
are  its  natural  growth,  though  weeds,  give  di- 
rection and  employment  to  the  industry  of 
the  other.  The  accidents  of  inheritance  by 
birth,  of  accumulation  of  property  in  partial 
masses,  are  thus  counteracted, — and  the  aneu- 
risms in  the  circulating  system  prevented  or 
rendered  fewer  and  less  obstinate, — whilst  ani- 
mal want,  the  sure  general  result  of  idleness 
and  its  accompanying  vices,  tames  at  length 
the  selfish  host,  into  the  laborious  slaves  and 
mechanic  implements  of  the  self-interested. 
Thus,  without  public  spirit,  nay,  by  the  predo- 
minance of  the  opposite  quality,  the  latter  are 
the  public  benefactors  :  and,  giving  steadfast- 
ness and  compactness  to  the  whole,  lay  in  the 
ground  of  the  canvass,  on  which  minds  of  finer 
texture  may  impress  beauty  and  harmony. 

Lastly,  there  is  in  the  heart  of  all  men  a 
working  principle, — call  it  ambition,  or  vanity, 
or  desire  of  distinction,  the  inseparable  adjunct 
of  our  individuality  and  personal  nature,  and 
flowing  from  the  same  source  as  language 
— the  instinct  and  necessity  in  each  man  of 
declaring  his  particular  existence,  and  thus  of 
singling  or  singularizing  himself.  In  some 
this  principle  is  far  stronger  than  in  others, 
while  in  others  its  comparative  dimness  may 
pass  for  its  non-existence.     But  in  thoughts  at 


3^"  OMNIANA. 

least,  and  secret  fancies  there  is  in  all  men 
(idiocy  of  conrse  excepted)  a  wish  to  remain 
the  same  and  yet  to  be  something  else,  and 
something  more,  or  to  exhibit  what  they  are, 
or  imagine  they  might  be,  somewhere  else  and 
to  other  spectators.  Now,  though  this  desire 
of  distinction,  when  it  is  disproportionate  to  the 
powers  and  qualities  by  which  the  individual 
is  indeed  distinguished,  or  when  it  is  the  go- 
verning passion,  or  taken  as  the  rule  of  con- 
duct, is  but  a  "  knavish  sprite,"  yet  as  an  at- 
tendant and  subaltern  spirit,  it  has  its  good 
purposes  and  beneficial  effects :  and  is  not 
seldom 

sent  with  broom  before, 

To  sweep  the  dust  behuid  the  door. 

Though  selfish  in  its  origin,  it  yet  tends  to  ele- 
vate the  individual  from  selfishness  into  self- 
love,  under  a  softer  and  perhaps  better  form 
than  that  of  self-interest,  the  form  of  self-res- 
pect. Whatever  other  objects  the  man  may 
be  pursuing,  and  with  whatever  other  inclina- 
tions, he  is  still  by  this  principle  impelled  and 
almost  compelled  to  pass  out  of  himself  in 
imagination,  and  to  survey  himself  at  a  suffi- 
cient distance,  in  order  to  judge  what  figure  he 
is  likely  to  make  in  the  eyes  of  his  fellow  men. 
But  in  thus  taking  his  station  as  at  the  apex  of 
a  triangle,  while  the  self  is  at  one  angle  of  the 
base,  he  makes  it  possible  at  least  that  the 
image  of  his  neighbour  may  appear  at  the 


OMNTANA. 


385 


Other,  whether  by  spontaneous  association,  or 
placed  there  for  the  purposes  of  comparison ; 
and  so  both  be  contemplated  at  equal  distance. 
But  this  is  the  first  step  towards  disinterested- 
ness ;  and  though  it  should  never  be  reached, 
the  advantage  of  the  appearance  is  soon  learnt, 
and  the  necessity  of  avoiding  the  appearance 
of  the  contrary.  But  appearances  cannot  be 
long  sustained  without  some  touch  of  the  rea- 
lity. At  all  events  there  results  a  control  over 
our  actions  ;  some  good  may  be  produced,  and 
many  a  poisonous  or  offensive  fruit  will  be  pre- 
vented. Courtesy,  urbanity,  gallantry,  munifi- 
cence ;  the  outward  influence  of  the  law  shall 
I  call  it,  or  rather  fashion  of  honour— these 
are  the  handsome  hypocrisies  that  spring  from 
the  desire  of  distinction.  I  ask  not  the  genius 
of  a  Machiavel,  a  Tacitus,  or  a  Swift;— it 
needs  only  a  worldly  experience  and  an  obser- 
ving mind,  to  convince  a  man  of  forty  that 
there  is  no  medium  between  the  creed  of  mis- 
anthropy and  that  of  the  gospel. 

A  pagan  might  be  as  orthodox  as  Paul  on 
the  doctrine  of  works.  First, — set  aside  the 
large  portion  of  them  that  have  their  source  in 
the  constitutional  temperament, — the  merit  of 
which,  if  any,  belongs  to  nature,  not  to  the  in- 
dividual agent ;  and  of  the  remaining  number 
of  good  works,  nine  are  derived  from  vices 
for  one  that  has  its  origin  in  virtue.  I  have 
often  in  looking  at  the  water-works,  and  com- 
plex machinery  of  our  manufactories,  indulged 

VOL.  1.  c  c 


386  OMNIANA. 

a  humorous  mood  by  fancying  that  the  ham- 
mers, cogs,  fly-wheels,  &c.  were  each  actuated 
by  some  appetite,  or  passion — hate,  rage,  re- 
venge, vanity,  cupidity,  &c.  while  the  general 
result  was  most  benignant,  and  the  machine, 
taken  as  a  whole,  the  product  of  power,  know- 
ledge, and  benevolence  !  Such  a  machine  does 
the  moral  world,  the  world  of  human  nature, 
appear — and  to  those  who  seem  ever  more  to 
place  the  comparison  and  the  alternative  be- 
tween hell  and  earth,  and  quite  overlook  the 
opposition  between  earth  and  heaven,  I  re- 
commend this  meditation. 


EVIDENCES  OF  CHRISTIANITY.* 

I.  Miracles — as  precluding  the  contrary  evi- 
dence of  no  miracles. 

II.  The  material  of  Christianity,  its  exis- 
tence and  history. 

III.  The  doctrines  of  Christianity,  and  the 
correspondence  of  human  nature  to  those  doc- 
trines,— illustrated,  1  st,  historically — as  the  ac- 
tual production  of  a  new  world,  and  the  depen- 
dence of  the  fate  of  the  planet  upon  it ; — 2nd, 
individually — from  its  appeal  for  its  truth  to 
an  asserted  fact, — which,  whether  it  be  real  or 
not,  every  man  possessing  reason  has  an  equal 

*  Dictated  to,  and  communicated  by,  Dr.  Brabant  of  De- 
vizes.    Ed. 


I 


OMNIANA.  387 

power  of  ascertaining  within  himself; — name- 
ly, a  will  which  has  more  or  less  lost  its  free- 
dom, though  not  the  consciousness  that  it 
ought  to  be  and  may  become  free ; — the  con- 
viction that  this  cannot  be  achieved  without 
the  operation  of  a  principle  connatural  with 
itself; — the  evident  rationality  of  an  entire 
confidence  in  that  principle,  being  the  condi- 
tion and  means  of  its  operation  ; — the  experi- 
ence in  his  own  nature  of  the  truth  of  the  pro- 
cess described  by  Scripture  as  far  as  he  can 
place  himself  within  the  process,  aided  by  the 
confident  assurances  of  others  as  to  the  effects 
experienced  by  them,  and  which  he  is  striving 
to  arrive  at.  All  these  form  a  practical  Chris- 
tian. Add,  however,  a  gradual  o^^ening  out  of 
the  intellect  to  more  and  more  clear  percep- 
tions of  the  strict  coincidence  of  the  doctrines 
of  Christianity,  with  the  truths  evolved  by  the 
mind,  from  reflections  on  its  own  nature.  To 
such  a  man  one  main  test  of  the  objectivity, 
the  entity,  the  objective  truth  of  his  faith,  is  its 
accompaniment  by  an  increase  of  insight  into 
the  moral  beauty  and  necessity  of  the  process 
which  it  comprises,  and  the  dependence  of  that 
proof  on  the  causes  asserted.  Believe,  and  if 
thy  belief  be  right,  that  insight  which  gradu- 
ally transmutes  faith  into  knowledge  will  be 
the  reward  of  that  belief.  The  Christian,  to 
whom,  after  a  long  profession  of  Christianity, 
the  mysteries  remain  as  much  mysteries  as 
before,  is  in  the  same  state  as  a  schoolboy  with 


388  OMNIANA. 

regard  to  his  arithmetic  to  whom  the  facit  at 
the  end  of  the  examples  in  his  cyphering  book 
is  the  whole  ground  for  his  assuming  that  such 
and  such  figures  amount  to  so  and  so. 

3rd.  In  the  above  I  include  the  increasing 
discoveries  in  the  correspondence  of  the  his- 
tory, the  doctrines  and  the  promises  of  Chris- 
tianity, M  ith  the  past,  present,  and  probable 
future  of  human  nature ;  and  in  this  state  a 
fair  comparison  of  the  religion  as  a  divine  phi- 
losophy, with  all  other  religions  which  have 
j^retended  to  revelations  and  all  other  systems 
of  philosophy  ;  both  with  regard  to  the  totality 
of  its  truth  and  its  identification  with  the  mani- 
fest march  of  affairs. 

I  should  conclude  that,  if  we  suppose  a  man 
to  have  convinced  himself  that  not  only  the 
doctrines  of  Christianity,  which  may  be  con- 
ceived independently  of  history  or  time,  as  the 
Trinity,  spiritual  influences,  &c.  are  coincident 
with  the  truths  which  his  reason,  thus  strength- 
ened, has  evolved  from  its  own  sources,  but 
that  the  historical  dogmas,  namely,  of  the  in- 
carnation of  the  creative  Logos,  and  his  be- 
coming a  personal  agent,  are  themselves  foun- 
ded in  philosophical  necessity ;  then  it  seems 
irrational,  that  such  a  man  should  reject  the 
belief  of  the  actual  appearance  of  a  religion 
strictly  correspondent  therewith,  at  a  given  time 
recorded,  even  as  much  as  that  he  should  re- 
ject Caesar's  account  of  his  wars  in  Gaul,  after 
he  has  convinced  himself  «  j^Woyz  of  their  pro- 
bability. 


OMNIANA.  389 

As  the  result  of  these  convictions  he  will 
not  scruple  to  receive  the  particular  miracles 
recorded,  inasmuch  as  it  would  be  miraculous 
that  an  incarnate  God  should  not  work  what 
must  to  mere  men  appear  as  miracles;  inas- 
much as  it  is  strictly  accordant  with  the  ends 
and  benevolent  nature  of  such  a  being,  to 
commence  the  elevation  of  man  above  his 
mere  senses  by  attracting  and  enforcing  atten- 
tion, first  through  an  appeal  to  those  senses. 
But  with  equal  reason  will  he  expect  that  no 
other  or  greater  force  should  be  laid  on  these 
miracles  as  such ;  that  they  should  not  be 
spoken  of  as  good  in  themselves,  much  less  as 
the  adequate  and  ultimate  proof  of  that  reli- 
gion ;  and  likewise  he  will  receive  additional 
satisfaction,  should  he  find  these  miracles  so 
wrought,  and  on  such  occasions,  as  to  give 
them  a  personal  value  as  symbols  of  important 
truths  when  their  miraculousness  was  no  longer 
needful  or  efficacious. 


CONFESSIO  FIDEL     Nov.  3,  1816. 

I. 

I.  1  BELIEVE  that  I  am  a  free-agent,  inasmuch 
as,  and  so  far  as,  I  have  a  will,  which  renders 
me  justly  responsible  for  my  actions,  omissive 
as  well  as  commissive.  Likewise  that  I  pos- 
sess reason,  or  a  law  of  right  and  wrong,  which. 


390  OMNIANA. 

uniting  with  my  sense  of  moral  responsibility, 
constitutes  the  voice  of  conscience. 

II.  Hence  it  becomes  my  absolute  duty  to 
believe,  and  I  do  believe,  that  there  is  a  God, 
that  is,  a  Being,  in  whom  supreme  reason  and 
a  most  holy  will  are  one  with  an  infinite  power ; 
and  that  all  holy  will  is  coincident  with  the 
will  of  God,  and  therefore  secure  in  its  ulti- 
mate consequences  by  His  omnipotence ; — ^hav- 
ing,  if  such  similitude  be  not  unlawful,  such  a 
relation  to  the  goodness  of  the  Almighty,  as  a 
perfect  time-piece  will  have  to  the  sun. 

COROLLARY. 

The  wonderful  works  of  God  in  the  sensible 
world  are  a  perpetual  discourse,  reminding  me 
of  his  existence,  and  shadowing  out  to  me  his 
perfections.  But  as  all  language  presupposes 
in  the  intelligent  hearer  or  reader  those  pri- 
mary notions,  which  it  symbolizes  ;  as  well  as 
the  power  of  making  those  combinations  of 
these  primary  notions,  which  it  represents  and 
excites  us  to  combine, — even  so  I  believe,  that 
the  notion  of  God  is  essential  to  the  human 
mind  ;  that  it  is  called  forth  into  distinct  con- 
sciousness principally  by  the  conscience,  and 
auxiliarly  by  the  manifest  adaptation  of  means 
to  ends  in  the  outward  creation.  It  is,  there- 
fore, evident  to  my  reason,  that  the  existence 
of  God  is  absolutely  and  necessarily  insuscep- 
tible of  a  scientific  demonstration,  and  that 


OMNIANA.  391 

Scriptuie  has  so  represented  it.  For  it  com- 
mands us  to  believe  in  one  God.  /  am  the 
LiOrd  thy  God :  thou  shalt  have  none  other  gods 
but  me.  Now  all  commandment  necessarily 
relates  to  the  w  ill ;  whereas  all  scientific  de- 
monstration is  independent  of  the  will,  and  is 
apodictic  or  demonstrative  only  as  far  as  it  is 
compulsory  on  the  mind,  volentem,  nolentem. 

III.  My  conscience  forbids  me  to  propose  to 
myself  the  pains  and  pleasures  of  this  life,  as 
the  primary  motive,  or  ultimate  end,  of  my 
actions ; — on  the  contrary,  it  makes  me  per- 
ceive an  utter  disproportionateness  and  hetero- 
geneity between  the  acts  of  the  spirit,  as  virtue 
and  vice,  and  the  things  of  the  sense,  such  as 
all  earthly  rewards  and  punishments  must  be. 
Its  hopes  and  fears,  therefore,  refer  me  to  a 
different  and  spiritual  state  of  being  :  and  I  be- 
lieve in  the  life  to  come,  not  through  argu- 
ments acquired  by  my  understanding  or  dis- 
cursive faculty,  but  chiefly  and  effectively,  be- 
cause so  to  believe  is  my  duty,  and  in  obedi- 
ence to  the  commands  of  my  conscience. 

Here  ends  the  first  table  of  my  creed,  which 
would  have  been  my  creed,  had  I  been  born 
with  Adam ;  and  which,  therefore,  constitutes 
what  may  in  this  sense  be  called  natural  reli- 
gion, that  is,  the  religion  of  all  finite  rational 
beings.  The  second  table  contains  the  creed 
of  revealed  religion,  my  belief  as  a  Christian. 


31)2  OMNIANA. 


II. 


IV.  1  believe,  and  hold  it  as  the  fLindameii- 
tal  article  of  Christianity,  that  I  am  a  fallen 
creature ;  that  I  am  of  myself  capable  of 
moral  evil,  but  not  of  myself  capable  of  moral 
good,  and  that  an  evil  ground  existed  in  my 
will,  previously  to  any  given  act,  or  assignable 
moment  of  time,  in  my  consciousness.  I  am  born 
a  child  of  wrath.  This  fearful  mystery  1  pretend 
not  to  understand.  I  cannot  even  conceive  the 
possibility  of  it, — but  I  know  that  it  is  so.  My 
conscience,  the  sole  fountain  of  certainty,  com- 
mands me  to  believe  it,  and  would  itself  be  a 
contradiction,  were  it  not  so — and  what  is  real 
must  be  possible. 

V.  I  receive  with  full  and  grateful  faith  the 
assurance  of  revelation,  that  the  Word,  which  is 
from  all  eternity  with  God,  and  is  God,  assumed 
our  human  nature  in  order  to  redeem  me,  and 
all  mankind  from  this  our  connate  corruption. 
My  reason  convinces  me,  that  no  other  mode 
of  redemption  is  conceivable,  and,  as  did 
Socrates,  would  have  yearned  after  the  Re- 
deemer, though  it  would  not  dare  expect  so 
wonderful  an  act  of  divine  love,  except  only  as 
an  effort  of  my  mind  to  conceive  the  utmost  of 
the  infinite  greatness  of  that  love. 

VI.  I  believe,  that  this  assumption  of  hu- 
manity by  the  Son  of  God,  was  revealed  and 
realized  to  us  by  the  Word  made  flesh,  and 
manifested  to  us  in   Christ  Jesus;    and  that 


OMNIANA.  393 

his  miraculous  birth,  his  agony,  his  crucifixion, 
death,  resurrection,  and  ascension,  were  all 
both  symbols  of  our  redemption  (<paiv6iuEva  tmv 
vov/iuviov)  and  necessary  parts  of  the  awful 
process. 

VII.  I  believe  in  the  descent  and  sending 
of  the  Holy  Spirit,  by  whose  free  grace  ob- 
tained for  me  by  the  merits  of  my  Redeemer, 
I  can  alone  be  sanctified  and  restored  from  my 
natural  inheritance  of  sin  and  condemnation, 
be  a  child  of  God,  and  an  inheritor  of  the 
kingdom  of  God. 

COROLLARY. 

The  Trinity  of  persons  in  the  Unity  of  the 
God  would  have  been  a  necessary  idea  of  my 
speculative  reason,  deduced  from  the  neces- 
sary postulate  of  an  intelligent  creator,  whose 
ideas  being  anterior  to  the  things,  must  be 
more  actual  than  those  things,  even  as  those 
things  are  more  actual  than  our  images  de- 
rived from  them  ;  and  who,  as  intelligent,  must 
have  had  co-eternally  an  adequate  idea  of 
himself,  in  and  through  which  he  created  all 
things  both  in  heaven  and  earth.  But  this 
would  only  have  been  a  speculative  idea,  like 
those  of  circles  and  other  mathematical  figures, 
to  which  we  are  not  authorized  by  the  prac- 
tical reason  to  attribute  reality.  Solely  in 
consequence  of  our  Redemption  does  the  Tri- 
nity become  a  doctrine,  the  belief  of  which  as 


394  OMNI  AN  A. 

real  is  conimniuled  by  our  conscience.  But  to 
Christians  it  is  commanded,  and  it  is  false 
candour  in  a  Christian,  believing  in  original 
sin  and  redemption  therefrom,  to  admit  that 
any  man  denying  the  divinity  of  Christ  can  be 
a  Christian.  The  true  language  of  a  Christian, 
which  reconciles  humility  with  truth  would 
be ; — God  and  not  man  is  the  judge  of  man  : 
which  of  the  two  is  the  Christian,  he  will  de- 
termine ;  but  this  is  evident,  that  if  the  tliean- 
thropist  is  a  Christian,  the  psilanthropist  can- 
not be  so  ;  and  vice  vei'sa.  Suppose,  that  two 
tribes  used  the  same  written  characters,  but 
attached  different  and  opposite  meanings  to 
them,  so  that  iiiger,  for  instance,  was  used  by 
one  tribe  to  convey  the  notion  Mack,  by  the 
other,  ivhite; — could  they,  without  absurdity, 
be  said  to  have  the  same  language  ?  Even  so, 
in  the  instance  of  the  crucifixion,  the  same 
image  is  present  to  the  theanthropist  and  to  the 
psilanthropist  or  Socinian — but  to  the  latter  it 
represents  a  mere  man,  a  good  man  indeed  and 
divinely  inspired,  but  still  a  mere  man,  even  as 
Moses  or  Paul,  dying  in  attestation  of  the 
truth  of  his  preaching,  and  in  order  by  his  re- 
surrection to  give  a  proof  of  his  mission,  and 
inclusively  of  the  resurrection  of  all  men  : — to 
the  former  it  represents  God  incarnate  taking 
upon  himself  the  sins  of  the  world,  and  himself 
thereby  redeeming  us,  and  giving  us  life  ever- 
lasting, not  merely  teaching  it.  The  same 
difference,  that  exists  between  God  and  man, 


OMNIANA.  395 

between  giving  and  the  declaration  of  a  gift, 
exists  between  the  Trinitarian  and  the  Unita- 
rian. This  might  be  proved  in  a  few  moments, 
if  we  would  only  conceive  a  Greek  or  Roman, 
to  whom  two  persons  relate  their  belief,  each 
calling  Christ  by  a  different  name.  It  would 
be  impossible  for  the  Greek  even  to  guess,  that 
they  both  meant  the  same  person,  or  referred 
to  the  same  facts. 


END  OF  VOL.  I, 


C.  Whittingham,  Tooks  Court,  Chancery  Lane. 


university  ot  OaiiTornia 

SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 

305  De  Neve  Drive  -  Parking  Lot  17  •   Box  951388 

LOS  ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA  90095-1388 

Return  this  material  to  the  library  from  which  it  was  borrowed. 


\] 


■lAA 


01 


L    , 


Form  L9-Series  4939 


0 


rr\-T-rix«  v^iji7i_       j.u_»«j  i. 


/\3/; 


3   1158  00156  0332 


Ml  '^ 

i  .5- 


m/^ 


UC  SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 


AA    000  368  714    2 


iversity  of  Cal 
louthern  Regie 
Library  Facili