Skip to main content

Full text of "The mammalian fauna of Madura Cave, Western Australia :"

See other formats


UN'     RSITY  OF 
ILLIi^iS  LIBRARY 

nIt?HB^NA"CHAMPA'GN 
NATURAL  HIST.  SURVEY 


FIELDIANA 
Geology 

Published  by  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History 


Volume  31,  No.  1  February  14,  1973 

The  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Madura  Cave, 
Western  Australia 

Parti 

Ernest  L.  Lundelius,  Jr. 

Professor  of  Geological  Sciences,  University  of  Texas  at  Austin 

and  Research  Associate,  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History 

and 

William  D.  Turnbull 

Associate  Curator,  Fossil  Mammals,  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History 

INTRODUCTION 

This  is  the  first  of  several  planned  reports  of  the  second  investiga- 
tion of  the  stratified  deposits  of  Madura  Cave,  one  of  the  few  caves  in 
the  Eucla  Basin  known  to  contain  such  deposits.  As  such,  it  is  im- 
portant for  the  establishment  of  a  sequence.  Much  material  was 
obtained  during  this  investigation  and  the  collections  of  the  earlier 
investigation  have  also  been  used  in  the  preparation  of  the  present 
report. 

The  deposits  of  Madura  Cave  were  investigated  in  1955  by 
Lundelius.  A  brief  description  of  the  cave,  its  sediments  and  con- 
tained fossils,  and  their  importance  in  the  determination  of  the  faunal 
history  of  the  region  was  published  (Lundelius,  1963).  This  estab- 
lished that  the  deposits  were  stratified  and  that  extinct  marsupial 
remains  (Sthenurus)  present  in  the  lower  of  the  two  stratigraphic 
units  then  recognized  demonstrated  a  Pleistocene  age  for  that  unit. 
Thus  it  indicated  a  potential  for  gaining  a  longer  and  more  complete 
record  of  late  Pleistocene  faunal  elements  and  changes  if  a  more  ex- 
tensive study  and  excavation  could  be  made. 

Madura  Cave  is  located  in  the  Eucla  Basin,  which  occupies  a 
large  (nearly  170,000  sq.  km.  or  70,000  sq.  miles)  area  in  southern 
Australia  bordering  on  the  Great  Australian  Bight  (fig.  1).  The 
basin  is  vaguely  crescent-shaped,  bounded  on  the  south  for  over  500 

Library  of  Congress  Catalog  Card  Number:  72-9756 % 
Publication  1160  1 


•>  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

miles  by  the  Southern  Ocean  from  near  Penong  on  Fowlers  Bay  in 
the  east  to  Israelite  Bay  in  the  west.  Inland  its  border  reaches  north 
from  Penong  to  Lakes  Pidinga  and  Ifould,  then  to  Ooldea  where  it 
makes  a  decided  bend  westward,  in  a  great  sinuous  swing  that  takes 
it  past  Lakes  Jubilee  and  Gidgi.  From  this  point  it  takes  a  south- 
erly course  to  Balladonia  and  Israelite  Bay.  Thus  about  two-thirds 
of  the  Eucla  Basin  lies  within  Western  Australia,  and  one-third 
within  South  Australia. 

The  basement  complex  of  the  basin  is  reported  to  be  composed  of 
granitic  or  high  grade  metamorphic  rocks  (Ludbrook,  1958a,  b). 
The  basin  is  a  broad,  shallow  embayment  that  is  filled  with  onlapped 
Cretaceous  marine  conglomerates  and  shales  and  by  Cenozoic  mar- 
ine limestones.  The  latter  (the  Eucla  group  for  the  most  part,  which 
is  widespread  and  over  900  ft.  thick  at  Madura)  have  a  youthful 
karst  development  with  numerous  caves  and  dolines.  Hence  this 
constitutes  one  of  the  world's  largest  karst  regions  (Jennings,  1963). 
The  Eucla  group  is  comprised  of  the  lower  and  thicker  Wilson's 
Bluff  Limestone  and  the  upper  and  thinner  (100  ft.  or  less)  Nullar- 
bor  Limestone  (Singleton,  1954). 

Physiographically  it  is  an  area  of  extremely  low  relief  broken  only 
by  the  Hampton  Scarp  which  extends  from  near  Eucla  on  the  east 
(where  it  forms  a  sea  cliff — the  Bunda  Cliff)  for  approximately  150 
miles  west  near  Eyre  where  it  again  runs  along  the  Southern  Ocean. 
This  scarp  divides  the  region  into  the  low-lying  Roe,  or  Eyre,  Plain 
(about  100  ft.  above  sea  level)  to  the  south  and  the  far  larger  Bunda 
Plateau,  or  Hampton  Tableland,  (about  250  to  600  ft.  or  more  above 
sea  level)  to  the  north.  The  first  geologic,  biologic,  and  physio- 
graphic reports  of  the  region  were  made  by  Tate  (1879).  The  large 
central  portion  of  the  Hampton  Tableland  constitutes  the  true 
Nullarbor  Plain,  although  this  term  is  sometimes  loosely  used  for  the 
whole  region  of  the  Eucla  Basin. 

There  has  been  speculation  and  some  controversy  as  to  the  nature 
of  the  Hampton  Scarp.  Frost  (1958)  and  others  before  him  (Wool- 
nough,  1933;  David  &  Browne,  1950,  v.  1,  p.  538;  v.  2,  p.  548)  have 
considered  it  to  be  a  fault  scarp.  Ludbrook  (1958a)  concluded  on  the 
basis  of  paleontological  correlations  and  Pleistocene  depositional 
evidence  that  the  Nullarbor  Limestone  was  missing  from  the  seaward 


Fig.  1.  Map  of  region  of  the  Nullarbor  Plain  in  Western  Australia  and  South 
Australia,  with  detail  map  of  Madura  Cave  area  showing  location  of  the  cave,  the 
Hampton  scarp,  and  other  caves  nearby  on  the  Hampton  tableland. 


4  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

side  of  the  scarp  as  a  result  of  marine  erosion,  being  replaced  uncon- 
formably  by  thin  shelly  Pleistocene  marine  deposits.  Frost's  inter- 
pretation was  based  on  joint  patterns  and  lithic  correlations  from  the 
Madura  Bores  (number  1  below  the  scarp  and  numbers  2  and  3 
above).  Prior  fault  scarp  postulates  were  only  based  on  physio- 
graphic evidence.  Jennings  (1963)  has  thoroughly  reviewed  the 
various  arguments,  concluding  that,  "Further  stratigraphical  evi- 
dence may  be  necessary  before  this  issue  can  be  finally  decided;  one 
thing  seems  certain,  however,  namely  that  the  Hampton  Range 
[Scarp]  has  been  subjected  to  marine  erosion  and  is  no  longer  a  sim- 
ple fault  scarp.  Air  photographs  show  that  the  western  part  of  the 
Hampton  Range  takes  the  form  of  a  series  of  shallow,  smooth  curves 
in  plan,  best  interpreted  as  the  wavecut  bays  of  a  former  sea  cliff." 

The  Eucla  Basin  is  the  southern  part  of  the  central  arid  region  of 
Australia.  Most  of  this  area  receives  less  than  10  in.  of  rain  per  year 
and  is  subjected  to  high  evaporation  rates.  The  climate  of  most  of 
this  area  falls  into  the  BSh  category  of  the  Koppen  and  the  E  B'd 
of  the  Thornthwaite  classifications  of  climate  (Trewartha,  1954). 

This  area  is  interesting  from  the  standpoint  of  paleo-biogeogra- 
phy  because  it  is  situated  between  the  more  humid  coastal  areas  of 
southeastern  and  southwestern  Australia,  and  its  aridity  is  a  barrier 
to  the  free  exchange  of  faunal  elements  of  the  two  humid  regions. 
The  floral  zonation  is  directly  controlled  by  climatic  zonation.  A 
number  of  studies  of  speciation  patterns  of  various  groups  of  Recent 
and  fossil  vertebrates  in  southwestern  and  southeastern  Australia 
have  shown  that  these  two  regions  have  exchanged  faunal  elements 
across  this  area  at  one  or  more  times  in  the  past  (Serventy,  1951, 
1953;  Main  et  al.,  1958;  Gentilli,  1961;  and  others).  The  living 
fauna  is  a  desert  adapted  one.  Most  of  these  cited  studies  agree  that 
the  Nullarbor  Plain  was  the  probable  route  of  this  exchange,  and  that 
the  exchange  or  exchanges  took  place  when  the  climate  was  more 
humid  than  it  is  today.  Most  also  correlate  the  humid  periods  with 
glacial  stages  of  the  Pleistocene.  There  is,  however,  disagreement  on 
the  time  of  the  most  recent  exchange. 

The  fossil  record,  which  can  provide  the  basis  for  the  reconstruc- 
tion of  the  faunal  and  climatic  history,  is  poorly  known  for  the  Null- 
arbor  Plain.  It  is  confined  at  present  to  several  pond  deposits  near 
Balladonia  on  the  western  edge  and  to  cave  deposits  in  many  places. 
The  former  contain  remains  of  a  number  of  extinct  marsupials  which 
are  widely  distributed  in  Pleistocene  deposits  in  Australia,  (Glauert, 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  5 

1912;  Merrilees,  1968).  The  latter  contain  remains  of  both  extant 
and  extinct  forms  (Lundelius,  1957,  1963).  While  the  assemblages 
mentioned  above  demonstrate  a  more  humid  climate  in  the  past, 
there  is  little  or  no  data  that  permit  the  construction  of  a  sequence  of 
faunas  or  the  correlation  of  the  known  assemblages  with  those  in 
other  places.  Merrilees  (1968)  has  recently  reviewed  various  inter- 
pretations of  the  evidence  relating  to  the  Pleistocene  and  post- 
Plesitocene  climates  of  the  continent  in  comparison  with  those  of  the 
rest  of  the  world. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  MADURA  CAVE 

Madura  Cave  is  located  on  the  Roe  Plain,  six  miles  south  of  the 
settlement  of  Madura,  110  miles  west  of  Eucla  (fig.  1).  It  is  one  of 
the  few  known  caves  on  the  Roe  Plain  and  is  the  only  cave  south  of 
the  Hampton  Scarp  investigated  by  us.  The  cave  system  consists  of 
a  shallow  doline,  an  oval  depression  whose  long  axis  is  oriented 
NW-SE,  with  two  tunnels  extending  outward  from  its  margins  (fig.  2, 
and  see  Frost,  1958) .  The  oval  depression  quite  clearly  is  the  product 
of  a  collapse  of  the  roof  of  a  cave.  Frost  believed  the  cave  to  be 
formed  in  the  Nullarbor  Is.,  but  if  the  Ludbrook  (1958a,  b)  assess- 
ments are  correct,  it  is  developed  in  the  Wilson  Bluff  Is.  One  tunnel 
extends  southwestward  from  the  doline's  southern  end,  the  other 
northwestward  from  its  northern  end.  The  southern  tunnel  is  open 
for  160  ft.  It  is  40  ft.  wide  and  7  ft.  high  at  the  opening.  Its  floor 
consists  of  loose  gray  sand  and  is  at  the  same  level  as  the  bottom  of 
the  central  depression.  No  excavations  were  carried  out  in  this 
tunnel. 

The  northern  tunnel  is  much  larger.  It  extends  northwestward 
for  275  ft.  where  it  divides  into  two,  one  branch  trending  southwest- 
ward,  the  other  north-northwest.  Each  of  these  subdivide  again  into 
smaller  tunnels  which  gradually  shrink  until  they  cannot  be  entered. 
The  main  part  of  this  tunnel  is  about  20  ft.  wide  with  little  variation 
(fig.  2) .  A  small  tunnel  leaves  the  main  tunnel  to  the  southeast  140 
ft.  from  the  entrance. 

The  floor  of  the  main  tunnel  is  8-10  ft.  lower  than  the  surface  of 
the  depression.  It  has  a  gentle  gradient  toward  the  back  of  the  cave. 
The  floor  has  a  small  meandering  channel  cut  into  it  to  a  depth  of  one 
to  two  feet.  This  channel  sends  a  small  distributary  branch  into  the 
small  southeast  trending  passage  at  the  halfway  point  of  the  main 
tunnel.    The  main  channel  continues  on  to  the  branching  of  the  main 


FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 


.REAR      TRENCH  (#5) 


MAP     OF 

MADURA    CAVE 


010  \\  — APPROX.  POSITION  TRENCH  #  2  (ELL-1955) 


APPROX. 

POSITION  TRENCH  #1  (ELL-1955) 


ROCK     HOLE  =  O 
REFERENCE    POINTS  ==© 


MAGNETIC 


Fig.  2.    Map  of  cave. 

tunnel  where  it  follows  the  larger  southwest-trending  branch.  This 
channel  clearly  carries  water  from  the  surface  depression  during 
heavy  rains. 

STRATIGRAPHY 

In  1955  Lundelius  dug  two  test  trenches  in  the  main  tunnel  of 
Madura  Cave,  numbered  Trenches  1  and  2.  In  1964  we  added  three 
more  trenches  (fig.  2),  numbers  3-5.  These  are  precisely  located  with 
respect  to  the  cave  entrance  and  to  one  another,  as  well  as  to  various 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE 

SECTION  C-C  MADURA  CAVE 

ENTRANCE    PIT     SECTION    PARALLEL    TO     LONG     AXIS    OF    CAVE— #3 


c 


1      GRAY-BROWN     SILT 


(Tx    1145)    15.600  ±  250  YBP 
2     RED    CLAY     AND    SILT 


580    YBP 


jjy — (Tx    1142)    22.400  + 


LIMIT    OF y-Z^r^^If^^^^S^Z r^zQ^^-p-^Z: 

EXCAVATION 


4     WHITE     SANDY     SILT 


5     RED    CLAY 


Fig.  3.    Section  C-C,  Entrance  Trench,  3. 

other  landmarks  within  the  cave.  The  exact  locations  of  Trenches  1 
and  2  were  not  recorded  and  we  were  unable  to  relocate  them  pre- 
cisely in  1964.  Trench  1  lay  about  80  ft.  in  from  the  entrance,  near 
Trench  4,  and  Trench  2  lay  about  E  of  Instrument  Station  10  (fig.  2), 
near  Trench  5.  Trench  No.  3,  the  Entrance  Pit,  is  located  40  ft.  from 
the  entrance  in  approximately  the  center  of  the  cave.  Trench  4,  the 
Middle  Trench,  is  110  ft.  from  the  entrance  and  extends  out  from  the 
northeast  wall  to  the  midline  of  the  cave.  Trench  5,  the  Rear 
Trench,  is  located  in  the  northern  branch  and  is  oriented  parallel  to 
the  axis  of  the  branch. 

The  sequence  in  the  northeast  wall  of  Trench  3  (Sec.  C-C;  fig.  3) 
from  top  to  bottom  is  as  follows: 

1.  Loose,  gray-brown  silt  with  many  limestone  fragments  and 
boulders  up  to  4  in.  in  diameter  and  abundant  small  bones  and  or- 
ganic materials.  This  unit  forms  the  floor  of  the  main  passage  of  the 
cave.  Its  surface  is  irregular  because  of  the  incised  drainage  channel 
which  is  filled  with  limestone  boulders.    This  unit  is  2  ft.  thick. 

2.  Loose,  red  clayey  silt  with  lenses  of  gravel  and  bones  and 
numerous  limestone  boulders.    This  unit  is  2  ft.  thick  at  this  place. 


8  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

Two  C-14  dates1  based  on  bone  are  available  from  this  unit.  One 
(Tx  1145)  from  the  upper  one  foot  is  15,600  ±  250  years  B.P.  The 
other  (Tx  1142)  from  the  lower  one  foot  is  22,400  ±  580  years  B.P. 

The  bottom  of  this  unit  forms  the  roof  of  an  extensive  void  or 
opening,  a  "tunnel"  12  to  18  in.  high.  This  tunnel  which  is  formed 
completely  in  the  cave  fill  has  an  arched  roof  and  a  floor  which  slopes 
gently  toward  the  present  entrance.  The  floor  of  the  "tunnel"  is 
covered  with  limestone  cobbles  in  a  matrix  of  gray-brown  clay  and 
silt.  This  grades  downward  rapidly  into  the  more  reddish-colored 
material  typical  of  unit  3. 

3.  Very  loose,  brownish-red  silt  with  many  limestone  cobbles 
and    some  bones.    This  unit  is  23  in.  thick. 

4.  Loose,  almost  white,  sandy  silt  with  a  few  cobbles  and  some 
very  fragile  bones.  Many  of  the  cobbles  are  composed  of  limestone 
fragments  cemented  together.    This  unit  is  7  in.  thick. 

5.  Friable,  red  clay  with  limestone  cobbles  and  sparse  bones. 
There  were  ten  inches  exposed. 

The  sequence  in  the  southeast  wall  of  Trench  4,  the  main  trench, 
(Sec.  A-A';  fig.  4)  from  top  to  bottom  is  as  follows: 

1.  Loose  gray-brown  silt  with  numerous  limestone  cobbles  and 
boulders.  The  contact  of  this  unit  with  unit  two  is  irregular  and  is 
marked  by  a  1-2  in.  zone  of  relatively  clean  gravel.  The  top  has  ap- 
parently been  eroded  off  by  the  present  drainage.  As  a  result  of  these 
irregularities,  the  thickness  varies  from  42  in.  near  the  wall  to  12  in. 
in  the  center  of  the  cave.  A  C-14  date  (Tx  1146)  of  7,470  ±  120  B.P. 
was  obtained  from  bone  from  the  top  one  foot  of  this  unit. 

2.  Loose,  red  to  orange-red  clay  and  silt  with  numerous  cobbles 
and  boulders  and  abundant  bones.  Thickness  is  24  in.  Two  C-14 
dates  based  on  bone  are  available  for  this  unit.  One  (Tx  1140)  from 
the  upper  6  in.  is  18,990  ±  220  years.  The  other  (Tx  1141)  from  6  to 
12  in.  below  the  top  of  this  unit  is  20,000  ±  430  years. 

3.  Loose  to  tight,  yellow  orange  sand  with  few  cobbles.  Bones 
are  not  abundant.  It  is  composed  mostly  of  fine  limestone  fragments 
and  dust.  It  is  tightly  cemented  in  place  and  incorporates  cobbles 
and  pebbles  of  the  underlying  unit  where  the  cemented  areas  are  in 
contact  with  it.    This  unit  dips  slightly  toward  the  center  of  the  cave 

1  All  C-14  dates  reported  here  were  obtained  from  bone  samples  by  the  method 
developed  by  Haynes  (1968).  They  are  based  on  the  calcium  carbonate  contained 
in  the  structure  of  the  apatite  crystallites  of  the  bone. 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE 


ROCK    HOLE 


YELLOW -ORANGE    GRITTY    SAND 


'•>*t"i     RED-GRAY    SAND      AND     GRAVEL 
TIGHT    SILT    AND    CLAY     SEAMS 


RED-ORANGE     SILTY    CLAY 


(Tx1143)     37,880  ±  3,520   YBP 

Fig.  4.    Section  A-A',  Middle  Trench,  4. 

and  the  thickness  varies  from  6  to  8  in.  near  the  wall  to  0  in.  near  the 
middle  of  the  cave. 

4.  Loose,  dark  red  clayey  silt  with  less  rock  than  overlying  unit. 
Thickness  varies  from  6  in.  near  the  wall  to  3  in.  near  the  center  of 
cave. 

5.  Loose,  reddish  gray  sand  and  gravel  with  a  minor  amount  of 
limestone  dust  and  abundant  bones.  This  unit  has  a  "speckled" 
appearance  because  of  the  presence  of  well-rounded  particles  of  dark 
carbonaceous  limestone.  The  thickness  varies  from  6  in.  near  the 
wall  to  16  in.  toward  the  center  of  the  cave.  A  C-14  date  (Tx  1144) 
of  22,220  ±  570  years  B.P.  was  obtained  on  bone  from  units  4  and  5, 
most  of  it  from  near  the  contact  of  these  units  or  at  the  interface. 

6.  Soft,  white  limestone  powder  with  thin  seams  of  orange  clay. 
Bones  absent.  Thickness  varies  from  27  in.  near  the  wall  to  15  in. 
near  the  center  of  the  cave. 

7.  Tight,  reddish-orange,  silty  to  sandy  clay  with  few  large  rocks. 
Fifteen  inches  were  exposed.  A  C-14  date  (Tx  1143)  of  37,880  ± 
3,520  years  B.P.  was  obtained  from  bone  from  the  lower  one  foot  of 
this  unit. 


ID 

* 

X 

0 

z 

UJ 

a: 

\- 

LU 

-> 

a: 

< 

< 

UJ 

o 

tr. 

UJ 

< 

IL 

1- 

DC 

0 

< 

Z) 

-I 
-I 

1 

Q 

< 

X 

1- 

0 
0. 

DO 

1 

0) 

< 

HI 

Q. 
< 

DO 

IL 

UJ 

_1 

2 
O 

0 

1- 

UJ 

< 

U 
0) 

1— 

UJ 

u. 

W 

o 

0 

0 

LU 

cm 

w 

CO 

z 

< 

u 

s 

o 

0 

IL 

r 

z 

w 

0 

0) 
UJ 

o 

ID 

r 
o 

z 

UJ 

rr 
I- 

10 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  11 

In  the  east  wall  of  Trench  5  (Sec.  B-B';  fig.  5),  parallel  to  the  long 
axis  of  the  passageway,  the  following  sequence  is  exposed : 

1.  Loose,  brownish-gray  sandy  silt  with  limestone  cobbles  and 
boulders.  This  is  lenticular  and  appears  to  be  the  filling  of  a  channel 
which  was  cut  30  in.  into  the  underlying  sediments.  To  the  north,  it 
forms  the  surface  of  the  cave  floor,  thickens  to  approximately  2  ft. 
and  acquires  thin  layers  of  rock  dust  which  thin  and  disappear  south- 
ward. 

2.  Loose,  light  orange  to  reddish-orange  sand  and  gravel  with  a 
minor  amount  of  silt  and  many  limestone  fragments.  It  is  about  1  ft. 
thick.    To  the  north  it  ends  against  large  limestone  boulders. 

3.  Loose,  reddish-brown  silt  with  no  cobbles.  This  is  a  channel 
fill  which  has  been  cut  through  by  a  subsequent  channel  of  unit  1, 
leaving  this  unit  preserved  only  on  the  sides  of  the  channel  it  fills. 

4.  Alternating  layers  of  brown  silt  and  white  rock  dust.  The 
strata  in  the  upper  part  are  up  to  6  in.  thick  with  lenses  of  coarser 
material  and  bones.  The  lower  layers  are  1-2  in.  thick.  The  rela- 
tionship of  unit  5  to  this  one  may  indicate  that  unit  4  is  compound. 
Unit  5  appears  to  be  emplaced  into  the  lower  part  of  unit.  4.  No 
evidence  of  any  change  was  seen  in  unit  4,  aside  from  the  change  in 
the  thickness  of  the  layers  of  silt  and  rock  dust. 

To  the  north  this  unit  becomes  coarser  and  ends  among  large 
limestone  boulders.  The  upper  part  overlaps  these  boulders  and  a 
few  of  the  individual  layers  extend  into  the  silts  characteristic  of  unit 
5,  suggesting  that  the  upper  parts  of  units  4  and  5  interdigitate  in  this 
area.  The  bedding  in  the  parts  of  both  units  4  and  5  that  underlie  the 
boulders  is  disturbed  in  a  way  that  suggests  that  the  boulders  fell 
from  the  roof  of  the  cave  into  the  sediments. 

5.  Loose,  reddish-brown  silt  with  few  rocks.  It  is  similar  to  unit 
3.    This  unit  rests  largely  on  large  limestone  boulders. 

6.  Large  limestone  boulders  in  a  matrix  of  reddish-orange  clayey 
silt.    The  base  of  the  unit  was  not  reached  in  the  excavations. 

Multiple  channelings  and  other  disturbances  of  the  sedimentary 
regime,  so  clearly  seen  in  the  walls  of  Trench  5,  indicate  a  very  com- 
plex genesis  of  the  sequence  of  beds  in  the  rear  of  the  cave.  This  ap- 
pears to  be  in  contrast  to  the  simpler-looking  sequences  in  Trenches 
3  and  4.  These  are  somewhat  deceptive  because  the  evidences  of 
disturbances  in  deposition  (cavity,  lenses,  and  channels),  being  near 


Fig.  5.    Section  B-B',  Rear  Trench,  5. 


12  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

horizontal  and  low-angled  features,  are  less  apparent.  All  such  evi- 
dences of  a  complex  depositional  history  argue  for  extreme  caution 
when  attempting  to  correlate  strata  between  trenches.  Hence  no 
correlation  will  be  made  for  Trench  5  beyond  noting  that  the  brown 
silt  (unit  1,  the  uppermost  channel)  is  similar  to  that  of  the  top  unit 
in  Trenches  1,  3,  and  4:  presumably  unit  1  in  each  of  these  trenches 
is  approximately  equivalent. 

It  is  possible  to  make  some  limited  correlations  of  stratigraphic 
units  between  Trenches  3  and  4  on  the  basis  of  the  C-14  dates.  It  is 
probable  that  the  uppermost  brown  silt  exposed  in  both  is  the  same 
age.  It  is  similar  in  both  trenches  and  is  very  different  from  the 
underlying  material.  The  C-14  date  of  7,470  +  120  years  B.P.  was 
obtained  from  bone  adjacent  to  Trench  4.  No  C-14  date  on  this  unit 
from  Trench  3  is  available.  The  red  clay  and  silt,  designated  unit  2 
in  Trenches  3  and  4  is  similar  in  both  places  and  is  probably  equiva- 
lent to  the  red  soil  reported  for  Trench  1  (Lundelius,  1963).  In  gen- 
eral, the  C-14  dates  support  a  correlation  based  on  lithology. 

The  discrepancies  concern  the  top  and  bottom  of  the  red  clay  and 
silt,  designated  unit  2  in  both  trenches,  and  units  4-5  of  Trench  4. 
The  difference  in  the  age  of  the  top  of  unit  2  is  readily  explicable  in 
terms  of  the  erosion  surface  that  separates  the  upper  brown  silt  from 
the  underlying  red  clay  and  silt.  The  discrepancies  in  the  ages  of  the 
unit  2  lower  boundaries  are  interpreted  as  the  result  of  different  ages 
for  the  onset  of  deposition  of  unit  2  material  in  the  two  areas  of  the 
cave.  In  Trench  4  we  have  no  C-14  dates  for  the  lowermost  foot  of 
unit  2,  but  the  date  for  units  4-5  indicates  that  the  bottom  of  unit  2 
in  this  trench  is  younger  than  the  bottom  of  this  unit  in  Trench  3. 
Different  materials  are  being  deposited  in  different  parts  of  the  cave 
today.  Light-colored,  fine-grained,  granular  material  similar  to  that 
of  unit  6  of  Trench  4  is  accumulating,  apparently  by  spalation  from 
the  walls,  along  the  sides  of  the  cave  in  some  cases.  This  is  different 
from  the  brown  silt  and  clay  that  is  being  deposited  by  runoff  from 
the  surface. 

Correlations  with  the  units  exposed  in  the  other  trenches  seem  im- 
possible at  present  with  the  exception  of  the  upper  brown  silt  and  the 
uppermost  6  in.  of  the  underlying  red  clay  in  Trench  1  reported  by 
Lundelius  (1963) .  They  are  probably  the  same  as  units  1  and  units  2 
in  Trenches  3  and  4.  No  correlations  can  be  made  for  units  below 
unit  2  of  Trenches  3  and  4. 

The  fact  that  all  of  the  deposits  in  the  northern  tunnel  are 
topographically  lower  than  the  material  in  the  central  doline  raises 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  13 

the  possibility  that  material  in  the  northern  tunnel  may  be  in  part  re- 
worked. This  is  not  believed  to  be  a  serious  problem  because  stra- 
tigraphy and  C-14  date  chronology  are  consistent.  Reworking  may 
have  happened  with  an  occasional  specimen,  however. 

An  analysis  of  the  salts  in  the  dry  screen  concentrates  has  been 
carried  out  for  us  by  Mr.  Gordon  F.  U.  Baker  (personal  communica- 
tion, 1965).  The  brown  silt  of  unit  1  contained  .26  per  cent  chlorides 
and  2  per  cent  sulfates;  the  concentrates  from  unit  2  contained  .05 
per  cent  chlorides.  Although  these  results  were  obtained  from  dry 
screen  concentrates  and  may  not  be  completely  accurate  indicators 
of  the  salt  content  of  the  two  materials,  they  are  highly  suggestive 
of  significant  climatic  differences  at  the  times  of  deposition  of  the 
two  units.  This  will  be  discussed  in  more  detail  in  a  later  publica- 
tion on  environmental  interpretation  in  our  series. 

METHODS 

Material  was  removed  from  Trenches  3-5  in  approximately  6  in. 
intervals  within  each  stratigraphic  unit,  with  one  exception  (unit  1) 
for  which  a  sample  of  the  top  1  ft.  was  taken  adjacent  to  Trench  4. 
All  matrix  was  dry  sieved  in  the  field  and  all  concentrate  larger  than 
1/50  in.  was  kept.  The  better  specimens  were  picked  in  the  field  and 
treated  with  shellac  to  minimize  breakage  and  loss  of  teeth. 

The  map  of  the  cave  (fig.  2)  was  made  with  a  Brunton  compass 
and  tape  and  an  open-sight  alidade. 

Tooth  measurements  were  made  as  shown  in  Figure  6  using  either 
micrometer  calipers  graduated  to  .01  mm.  or  a  microscope  ocular 
micrometer  graduated  into  100  units,  which,  with  the  optics  usually 
used,  permitted  direct  reading  to  either  .038  mm.  or  .051  mm.  Inter- 
polation permitted  accurate  readings  to  half  of  these  values  per  unit. 
Other  measurements  were  made  with  vernier  calipers  graduated  to 
.1  mm.  and  capable  of  interpolation  to  about  .01  with  the  vernier 
scale. 

The  dental  nomenclature  in  general  follows  the  familiar  Cope-Os- 
borne  terminology  with  additions  taken  from  Hershkovitz's  (1971) 
summary  of  terms  used  by  a  great  number  of  authors.  The  first  use 
of  a  term  is  followed  by  the  Hershkovitz  numerical  designation  given 
in  parenthesis. 

Because  the  dental  morphology  of  many  of  the  taxa  of  Australian 
mammals  is  poorly  known,  we  have  figured  dentitions  of  Recent 
species  in  cases  in  which  this  aids  the  identification  and  description  of 


14 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  15 

the  fossil  material.  The  drawings  were  made  by  Dr.  Tibor  Parenyi 
from  camera  lucida  drawings  of  the  specimens.  They  are  accurate  as 
to  scale,  dimensions,  and  proportions,  and  are  shaded  to  show  details 
of  surface  texture  and  appearance,  and  to  de-emphasize  distracting 
cracks,  breaks,  or  other  artifacts. 

The  bivariate  scatter  diagrams  are  plotted  to  the  same  scale  for 
each  group  of  organisms  to  facilitate  comparisons  (see  figs.  12,  13,  for 
examples) . 

ABBREVIATIONS 

Abbreviations  used  are  as  follows:  FMNH  or  FM — Field  Museum 
of  Natural  History,  Recent  Mammal  Collection;  PM — Field  Mu- 
seum fossil  mammal  collection;  MVZ — Museum  of  Vertebrate  Zool- 
ogy, University  of  California,  Berkeley;  TMM  or  UT — Texas 
Memorial  Museum,  University  of  Texas  at  Austin1;  WAM — Western 
Australian  Museum;  L — length;  W — width;  AW — anterior  width; 
PW — posterior  width;  Tr.  L — trigonid  length;  Tal.L — talonid  length. 
Other  abbreviations  are  either  in  common  use  or  are  defined  where 
used  in  the  text. 

SYSTEMATICS 

Class  Mammalia 

Subclass  Theria 

Infraclass  Eutheria  (Sensu  VandeBroek,  1961,  1964) 

Cohort  Marsupiata  (Sensu  Turnbull,  1971;  =  Metatheria) 

Order  Marsupicarnivora  (Ride,  1964) 

Dasyuridae 

Phascogalinae 

Genus  and  species  indet. 

The  fauna  contains  this  indeterminate  taxon,  a  pigmy  antechinus, 
which  is  close  to  Planigale  ingrami  and  Antechinus  maculatus  in  size 
and  most  of  its  dental  morphology,  but  which  differs  from  both  in 
several  ways  that  prevent  an  assignment  to  either  genus. 

1  Fossil  vertebrates  at  Austin  were  formerly  in  the  collections  of  the  Bureau 
of  Economic  Geology  and  (in  earlier  reports)  bore  the  prefix  BEG.  They  have  been 
transferred  to  the  Texas  Memorial  Museum  and  will  henceforth  bear  the  prefix 
TMM.  An  integral  part  of  every  TMM  catalogue  number  is  the  five-digit 
locality  designation.  That  for  Madura  Cave  is  41106-.  In  addition,  recent  mam- 
mals in  the  UT  or  TMM  collection  have  an  M  prefix  designation. 


16  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

Material. — 

Entrance  Pit  (Trench  3),  Lower  red  unit,  under  collapse  (unit  3) 

TMM  41106-660,  right  mandible  with  MT. 
Middle  Pit  (Trench  4),  unit  2,  level  2 

TMM  44106-661,  -662,  edentulous  left  mandibles  with  alveoli  for 

TMM  41106-663,  right  mandible  with  M^  and  alveoli  for  rest 

of  cheek  teeth  and  C. 
WAM  72.3.6,  right  mandible  with  MT_^  and  alveoli  for  other  cheek 

teeth  and  C. 

TMM  41106-667,  -668,  edentulous  mandibular  fragments  with 
alveoli  of  last  tooth  or  two. 

TMM  41106-741,  left  M^  (fig.  8) 

TMM  41106-742,  left  MT 

TMM  41106-743,  right  M^  or  7 

TMM  41106-744,  right  ramus  fragment  with  MT 

TMM  41106-745-6,  two  edentulous  right  ramus  fragments 

PM  25596,  right  ramus  with  M7  and  alveoli  for  M^  and  MT 

PM  25597,  right  ramus  with  M7_T  (fig.  9B) 

PM  25710,  right  ramus  fragment  with  M7 

PM  25713,  right  ramus  fragment  with  MT  or  M^ 

WAM  72.3.7,  left  mandible  with  M^  and  alveoli  for  PT  and  other 
molars 

PM  26189,  edentulous  right  ramus  with  alveoli  for  M^_T 

PM  26193,  left  MT 

PM  26194,  -5,  a  right  ramus  fragment  with  alveoli  for  four  teeth 

and  a  left  with  alveoli  for  three,  respectively. 
PM  26268,  left  MT 
PM  26269,  right  M^  or  * 
PM  26270-1,  two  edentulous  right  ramus  fragments. 

Units  4-5 

WAM  72.3.3,  right  maxillary  with  M-  and  alveoli  for  other  molars 
TMM  41106-696,  left  ramus  with  PT-M7  and  alveoli  for  other 

cheek  teeth  (fig.  9A) 
TMM  41106-699,  left  mandible  with  M^_T  and  alveoli  for  rest  of 

cheek  teeth  through  C, 


SMINTHOPSIS 
CRASSICAUDATA 

AND 
ANTECHINOMYS 
SPENCERI 


PLANISALE    C.F. 
INGRAMI 


MADURA 
SPECIES 
INDET. 


ANTECHINUS 
MACULATUS 


Fig.  7.  Diagram  of  condition  of  crowding  of  premolars  of  certain  phascogales 
as  reflected  in  their  alveolar  patterns.  Shown  are  the  Madura  Planigale-\\ke  form 
and  several  other  small  phascogales  which  are  compared  to  it. 


17 


18  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

TMM  41106-740,  left  M^  (fig.  8) 

WAM  72.3.1,  edentulous  right  max. 

TMM  41106-748,  edentulous  left  max. 

TMM  41106-749,  -750,  edentulous  right  mandible  fragments 

TMM  41106-751,  -752,  753,  edentulous  left  mandible  fragments 

TMM  41106-754,  right  MT 

PM  25621,  left  maxillary  fragment  with  P*-*  and  alveoli  for  C, 
P^  and  M1  (fig.  8) 

PM  26190,  left  maxillary  with  M^  and  alveoli  for  M^  and  MA  (fig. 

8) 
PM  26191,  right  ramus  fragment  with  MT  and  alveoli  for  P7_T  and 

M¥.7 
PM  26192,  right  ramus  fragment  with  Mg  and  part  of  M7  and 

alveoli  for  MT 

PM  26216,  left  M-l 

PM  26272,  edentulous  left  max.  with  alveoli  for  C-M- 

PM  26273,  -274,  -275,  -276,  edentulous  left  ramus  fragments 

WAM  72.3.4  and  WAM  72.3.5,  edentulous  right  ramus  fragments 

WAM  72.3.2,  right  M1 

Unit  7,  level  2 
TMM  41106-659,  right  mandible  with  PT,  MT 

Descriptions. — This  is  the  smallest  and  one  of  the  rarest  dasyurids 
represented  in  the  Madura  collection.  Only  ten  fragments  were  re- 
covered that  preserve  any  part  of  the  maxillary  bone  or  upper  denti- 
tion and,  fortunately,  one  of  them  (PM  25621)  shows  the  condition 
of  the  root  pattern  of  the  upper  premolars.  The  pattern  corresponds 
to  that  of  A.  maculatus,  with  P-*  being  crowded  out  of  alignment, 
rather  than  with  that  of  Planigale  c.f.  ingrami  in  which  the  pre- 
molars are  all  aligned  (fig.  7A) . 

The  Pa  and  PA  are  each  elliptical  in  outline  with  a  single  prominent 
central  cusp  that  is  rounded  anteriorly  and  ridged  posteriorly  (and 
worn  in  PM  25621,  fig.  8B).  The  posterior  ridge  runs  to  a  prominent 
cingular  cuspule  and  a  weak  cingulum  surrounds  each  tooth. 

The  M-l's  (TMM  41106-740  and  PxM  26216)  are  triangular  in  out- 
line, with  very  small  paracones.    In  both,  the  metacone  is  much  the 

*  PL  or  P2.    The  first  of  the  premolar  teeth,  whatever  its  true  homology  is. 


Fig.  8.  The  Madura  Planigale-\ike  form.  The  right  upper  dentition  in  buccal 
(A)  and  occlusal  (B)  views,  based  upon  four  of  the  fragmentary  specimens  that 
contribute  the  most  to  knowledge  of  the  maxillary  and  its  dentition.  Shown,  left 
to  right  are  PM  25621  and  PM  26190,  the  maxillary  fragments  with  Pa-*  and  Ma 
and  TMM  41106-740  and  -741,  isolated  M±  and  M2. 


19 


20  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

largest  primary  cusp,  and  the  protocone  is  low  and  intermediate  in 
size  (fig.  8) .  The  paracone-stylocone  crest  (stylocrista)  portion  of  the 
eocrista  is  very  short,  as  in  most  phascogales,  due  to  the  very  narrow 
anterior  part  of  the  stylar  shelf.  The  posterior  half  of  the  stylar  shelf 
is  high  and  posterolaterally  expanded.  There  is  a  well-formed  ante- 
rior cingulum  which  ties  the  protocone  to  the  parastyle  at  the  poste- 
rior edge  of  that  cuspule.  No  distinct  conule  is  present,  but  this 
anterior  cingulum  is  inflected  near  the  base  of  the  paracone  in  a 
manner  suggestive  of  a  vestigial  protoconule.  The  posterior  cingu- 
lum also  ties  to  the  protocone,  but  shortly  after  leaving  that  cusp  it 
becomes  very  weak  and  continues  in  that  manner  past  the  base  of  the 
metacone  almost  to  the  posterolateral  corner  of  the  tooth.  In  this  it 
is  like  both  A.  maculatus  and  P.  ingrami  (figs.  10, 11)  and  differs  from 
most  Sminthopsis  crassicaudata  and  S.  murina  in  which  it  rarely 
reaches  as  far  as  the  posterior  side  of  the  metacone. 

The  M*  (TMM  41106-741)  is  a  deeply  worn  tooth  that  is  closer  in 
its  overall  shape  to  that  of  the  M-  than  to  that  of  the  M-  (fig.  8) .  It 
is  intermediate  in  the  degree  of  development  of  the  parastylar  shelf. 

The  M^  in  both  specimens  (TMM  41106-680  and  PM  26190)  is 
worn  and  the  relative  development  of  the  secondary  cusps  cannot 
be  determined  with  certainty.  The  tooth  has  the  normal  dasyurid 
triangular  shape  but  the  protocone  is  smaller  relative  to  the  re- 
mainder of  the  cusps  than  is  the  case  in  other  dasyurids  and  it  lacks 
the  posterior  bulge  seen  in  many  dasyurids  (fig.  8).  The  paracone  is 
smaller  and  lower  than  the  metacone.  The  mesostyle  (stylar  cusp 
C  of  Bensley,  1903)  is  the  only  stylar  cusp  preserved.  It  is  about 
the  same  size  relative  to  the  whole  tooth  as  in  other  small  dasyurids 
(Planigale  and  Antechinus),  but  is  less  pronounced  than  in  Sminthop- 
sis and  Antechinomys  spenceri  (AMNH  15012).  The  labial  (ecto- 
loph)  margin  is  notably  straighter  with  the  pre-mesostyle  notch 
shallower  than  in  Planigale  cf.  ingrami  (AMNH  160308)  or  Smin- 
thopsis crassicaudata  (UT  M-839).  In  this  it  is  more  like  A.  macu- 
latus. There  is  a  small  procingulum  in  the  region  of  the  antero- 
external  root  that  extends  lingually  from  the  parastyle  down  to  the 
base  of  the  tooth  where  it  is  weakly  joined  to  the  anterior  crest  from 
the  protocone. 

The  lower  jaws  and  dentition  are  represented  by  more  and  bet- 
ter, though  also  fragmentary,  materials.  Specimen  TMM  41106-696 
is  the  most  complete  of  the  lot  (fig.  9A).  In  no  case  are  incisor  or 
canine  teeth  preserved  and,  of  the  premolars,  only  the  last  (PT)  is 


4-1106  -696 


B 


PM    25597 


Fig.  9.  The  lower  dentition  of  the  Madura  Planigale-like  form,  seen  in  oc- 
clusal and  lingual  views.  A.  Left  mandibular  fragment  with  P?  through  Ms,  TMM 
41106-696.    B.  Right  mandibular  fragment,  PM  25597,  with  M3_T. 


21 


22 


FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 


*J® 


Fig.  10.    Antechinus  maculatus,  FM  64350. 
of  right  maxillary  and  its  dentition. 


A,  B.  Buccal  and  occlusal  views 


known  in  any  of  the  specimens.  In  all  specimens  in  which  the  evi- 
dence of  premolar  condition  is  preserved  by  teeth  or  alveoli  (TMM 
41106-663,  PM  26188,  TMM  41106-666,  TMM  41106-696,  TMM 
41106-699,  and  PM  26191  and  TMM  41106-659)  there  is  crowding 
in  this  region.  But  unlike  the  condition  of  crowding  in  Recent  Plani- 
gale  ingrami,  in  which  PT  is  consistently  crowded  out  of  line  and  is 
reduced  considerably,  here  it  is  the  anterior-most  premolar  that  is 
consistently  out  of  line  while  the  PT  is  usually  aligned  or  just  slightly 
out  of  line  in  some  specimens.  Figure  7B  diagrams  these  conditions 
for  P.  ingrami,  A.  maculatus,  the  Madura  specimens  discussed  here, 
and  other  small  phascogales.    The  depth  of  the  horizontal  ramus  is 


u 


Q 
23 


fe 


24 


FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 


J 


x 


tN-f» 


TPi^f 


Fig.  11.    Planigale  ingrami,  AMNH  160308. 
of  the  right  maxillary  and  upper  dentition. 


A,  B.  Buccal  and  occlusal  views 


variable,  but  never  very  deep.  The  inferior  dental  canal  is  usually 
divided  so  that  the  anterior  foramen  is  at  the  level  of  P^  (or  this  may 
be  further  divided  as  in  PM  26191,  with  reduced  openings  in  the 
region  of  P^_7  and  P^_T)  and  the  posterior  foramen  is  beneath  MT_^, 
often  under  the  posterior  root  of  MT. 

The  PT  has  a  sub-elliptical  outline  in  crown  view.  It  is  made  up 
of  a  primary  cusp  that  lies  somewhat  anterior  to  the  center  of  the 
tooth.    A  ridge  leads  anteriorly  from  its  apex  to  its  base  where  it 


V 


25 


26  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

joins  the  cingulum.  Posterior  to  the  apex  there  is  a  similar  crest 
that  descends  to  the  broadened  cingular  shelf  with  its  cuspule.  Wear 
rapidly  produces  a  flat  surface  on  this  crest,  a  surface  that  broadens 
with  increased  attrition.  The  cingulum  completely  surrounds  the 
tooth  at  its  base.  It  is  weak  anteriorly,  and  pronounced  posteriorly, 
especially  postero-labially. 

The  MT  is  a  triangular  tooth  with  the  protoconid  and  metaconid 
about  equal  in  height  and  placed  very  close  together.  The  para- 
conid  is  very  much  smaller  and  forms  the  anterior  end  of  the  tooth. 
The  talonid  is  basined.  It  is  bordered  labially  by  the  hypoconid, 
which  is  about  one-half  the  height  of  the  protoconid.  It  is  bordered 
lingually  by  a  low,  rounded  ridge  which  joins  the  metaconid  and  the 
hypoconulid.  The  posterior  margin  of  the  talonid  is  concave  and 
broadly  "V"-shaped.  The  hypoconulid  is  a  low  cusp  in  TMM  41106- 
666  located  at  the  posterolingual  corner  of  the  talonid.  It  is  the 
posterior-most  cusp  of  the  tooth.  The  hypoconid  and  the  hypo- 
conulid are  joined  in  TMM  41106-666  by  a  ridge  that  forms  the 
posterior  margin  of  the  talonid  basin.  The  hypoconulid  in  TMM 
41106-660  is  a  slightly  elongate  blunt  cusp.  It  is  not  joined  to  the 
hypoconid.  The  talonid  basin  is  thus  open  posteriorly.  There  is  no 
entoconid  in  either  TMM  41106-666  or  TMM  41106-660.  A  post- 
cingulum  extends  from  the  base  of  the  hypoconid  up  the  posterior 
face  of  the  tooth  and  merges  with  the  hypoconulid. 

The  Mg  and  M^  have  the  normal  dasyurid  structure.  The  trigo- 
nid  is  well  developed.  There  is  a  deep,  narrow  cleft  developed  in 
the  paracristid  (I')  ridge  that  connects  the  paraconid  and  proto- 
conid. The  talonid  is  basined  and  is  wider  than  long.  As  in  the  MT 
there  is  no  entoconid.  The  talonid  is  proportionately  shorter  than 
in  most  other  dasyurids.  Its  posterior  edge  is  straight  and  parallel 
to  the  posterior  edge  of  the  trigonid  except  at  the  posterolingual 
corner  where  it  turns  abruptly  posteriorly  to  join  the  hypoconulid. 
The  anterior  cingulum  extends  upward  from  the  antero-labial  side 
of  the  base  of  the  protoconid  but  does  not  reach  the  anterior  edge  of 
the  paraconid.  It  ends  abruptly  where  the  postero-lingual  corner  of 
the  preceeding  tooth  is  in  contact  with  the  paraconid.  The  posterior 
cingulum  extends  upward  along  the  posterior  face  of  the  talonid  and 
joins  the  hypoconulid. 

The  only  MT  is  in  PM  25597.  It  has  a  trigonid  that  is  nearly  the 
same  as  that  of  M7  in  its  proportions  (fig.  9B),  being  only  slightly 
smaller  and  more  compressed  laterally.  The  protoconid  is  much  the 
largest  cusp  in  both  height  and  bulk.    It  is  followed  by  the  meta- 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  27 

conid  which  is  rather  columnar  and  stands  nearly  two-thirds  as  high 
as  the  protoconid.  The  paraconid  has  a  broad  base  but  it  barely 
reaches  to  two-thirds  the  height  of  the  metaconid  in  its  worn  state. 
Since  this  cusp  shows  more  wear  than  the  others,  it  probably  was 
nearly  as  high  as  the  metaconid  in  the  unworn  tooth.  Both  crests, 
paracristid  (I')  and  the  combined  epicristid-centrocristid  (II'  and 
la'"),  have  a  carnassial  notch  and  groove.  The  posterior  part  of 
the  centrocristid  (lb'")  joins  this  main  crest  of  the  epicristid  at  its 
base,  medial  to  the  groove.  The  talonid  is  laterally  compressed, 
progressively  toward  the  rear.  It  has  a  well-developed  hypoconid. 
Antero-lingual  to  the  hypoconid  there  is  an  elongated  shallow  basin 
delimited  by  hypoconid,  centrocristid,  metaconid,  and  a  low  cingular 
crest,  apparently  equivalent  to  the  combined  postmetacristid,  disto- 
cristid,  and  entocristid  (I",  VI,  and  V  in  the  Hershkovitz  symbolism) 
There  is  no  entoconid  or  hypoconulid.  The  anterior  cingulum  is 
well  developed  with  a  good  parastylid  and  another  more  labial 
stylid,  the  two  surrounding  the  hypoconulid  of  the  M^. 

Discussion. — Pigmy  antechinuses  are  the  smallest  of  the  dasy- 
urids  and  are  among  the  smallest-sized  mammals.  They  are  not 
well-represented  in  collections  and  are  poorly  known  as  to  their 
dental  morphology,  their  ecology,  and  their  taxonomy. 

A  comparison  of  the  Madura  Cave  specimens  with  those  of  Re- 
cent species  shows  many  similarities,  such  as  size  and  the  tendency 
to  crowd  the  premolars.  Comparison  also  reveals  a  number  of  dif- 
ferences that  indicate  that  the  Madura  Cave  form  is  different  from 
the  described  Recent  species.  In  general,  the  cheek  teeth  of  the 
Madura  Cave  form  are  slightly  larger  than  their  counterparts  in 
Recent  Planigale  ingrami,  especially  PT  and  M^_T  (figs.  12, 13;  tables 
1,  2).  Comparison  with  MT_^  of  Antechinus  maculatus  is  very  close 
(fig.  12).  However,  PT  is  much  longer  in  the  Madura  Cave  form  than 
it  is  in  either  Planigale  ingrami  or  Antechinus  maculatus.  The  MT 
is  also  larger  than  that  of  Antechinus  maculatus  but  the  difference  is 
not  as  great  as  with  Planigale  ingrami. 

It  is  clear  that  the  Madura  Cave  material  cannot  be  referred  to 
any  of  the  described  species  of  pygmy  antechinuses.  In  addition, 
it  is  clear,  as  stated  by  Ride  (1970),  that  the  generic  grouping  of  the 
species  of  pygmy  antechinuses  is  still  in  doubt.  For  these  reasons 
we  are  not  assigning  the  Madura  Cave  material  to  a  genus  or  species. 

General  faunal  and  environmental  significance  of  the  presence 
of  this  taxon  in  the  Madura  Cave  deposits  will  be  deferred  until  the 
discussion  in  the  final  section  of  our  series  on  the  Madura  Cave.    It 


o. 

E 

D    #• 

O- 

»    l  o 

1™ 
I- 

E 
:- 

•  ■  * 

CO 

0 


b 

h- 

00 

*i 

< 

LU 

< 

u 

o 

< 

LU 
Q_ 

z 

LU 

I/) 

> 

3 

< 

< 

z 

u 

o 

T 

< 

Z 

U 

in 

ex. 

< 

z 

< 

Q_ 

< 

£ 

28 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE 


29 


3.6  3.8  4.0  4.2  4.4  4.6  4.8  s.O 

Length    M  1 _  4 

Fig.  13.  Bivariate  graph  comparing  Planigale  ingrami  (circle),  Antechinus 
maculatus  (square),  and  the  Madura  Cave  Planigale-like  species  (star).  Length  of 
lower  molar  tooth  row  is  plotted  against  length  of  P?  in  each  case.  Individually 
each  of  the  lower  teeth  of  the  Madura  form  is,  or  tends  to  be,  slightly  larger  than  its 
counterpart  in  the  other  species.  This  results  in  a  cumulative  difference  seen  in 
these  plots  so  as  to  give  complete  separation  of  the  taxa.  Wavy  lines  in  the 
P.  ingrami  plot  show  specimens  for  which  only  the  MT-4  length  value  was  avail- 
able. The  dashed  line  of  the  Madura  species  plot  is  an  estimate  of  the  probable 
limits  of  the  range  of  the  MT.?  length  values.  It  is  based  upon  the  cumulative 
engths  of  the  smallest  of  each  of  the  molars  (MT  +  M2  etc.)  for  the  shortest  limit, 
and  the  largest  of  each  for  the  longest  limit.  The  star  is  at  the  position  of  the  mean. 
In  each  case  a  93  per  cent  factor  was  applied  to  accomodate  for  the  overlapping  of 
the  teeth  in  the  series.  This  factor  was  chosen  because  it  applied  to  both  of  the 
other  taxa  shown,  and  hence  gave  the  best  indication  of  what  could  be  expected  in 
the  Madura  form.  The  only  P^'s  available  are  both  the  same  length,  so  there  is  no 
way  of  estimating  the  range  of  variability  from  the  sample  in  that  case. 

should  be  noted  that  Madura  Cave  is  over  1,000  miles  from  the  clos- 
est known  occurrence  of  any  living  pigmy  antechinus  as  follows: 
Antechinus  maculatus  in  the  extreme  southeast  corner  of  South 
Australia;  Planigale  ingrami  in  north  and  central  Queensland  and 
north  of  both  Western  Australia  and  the  Northern  Territory;  Plani- 


Fig.  12.  Bivariate  graph  comparing  proportions  of  the  lower  cheek  teeth  of 
Planigale  ingrami,  Antechinus  maculatus,  and  the  Madura  Cave  Planigale-like  form. 
Width  measurements  used  are  anterior  widths  of  molars  and  maximum  widths  of 
premolars. 


W   N    O 

in  eg  «o 

h  co  co 


at-    Of- 
Nt-     HO 


c 

o> 

s 

^ 

« 

e» 

s 

e 

ft.   £ 

c3    a> 

oj  a 

C      K 

a;   T3 

3     0) 

.s  s 

JS    c3 

s?    c 

CD 

C   -C 

rt    -<-» 

>>    O 

c   <d 

M   a; 

.-.    0 

»J3 

CS    "^ 

3    ^ 

T3  -r 
ca    ? 

4-> 

s* 

0) 

T3 

C 

ifl 

jg    rt 

■** 

1 

*3    ft 

03 

•si 

J3    « 

a 

— 

'5 

— ' 

03 

s 

o 

V-t 

a 

*  s 

c3 

9J 

«_     as 

o   s 

3 

h 

a>    <a 

e  i 

3^ 

CS     C 

0)     CS 

^  tO^lSO  !0<0     ^©     <0(0  (OtD  <D(C  (0(D     »(0 

-.  WNO  OO^J     MOO     BOl  DJt-  0000  IP,m     00O 

SC    i  P5  t":  "*.  °°  "*  «    ww    t>  -^  mm  i-H  h  |g  eg    co  i-H 

^^H  ^     CO     CO  '  1-i         '  1-H    1-H  *    ,_}            °    ,-J 

So  OOTtt-  (D<D     COM     31»  mo  Of1  .no     WW 

<!<  co  p£  ^huj  -«t  co    weo    wm  eg  oo  »h  *->  ^  £    -*  as 

'"H  i— i  co  co"  '  h     '  h  i- I  '  ,_} 

f^.  OOOiH  «■*     WOO     "300  iHD  0<0  ^n     'I'H 

tU  i  Ph  ^  *"i  ^  "^  m.    w.  TO.  *°.  w.  ^  t^  T1  °.  as  »h  co  os 

^^"  i— I  CO  CO  i— I  iH  iH  *  ,_J 

^H  CO 

*£<  O  »NN  NO     fflO     Mi*  MN  (DM  _,«     00O! 

^  CD  iO    H   rf  ^  n     ^f  co     IB  M  H  (.  O  3j  5  ©     B  a 

rH    CO    CO  IH  »H  *   ,_J 

Uj  CD 

•7$  HWM  ^Tf     M>*     t-O  WW  MM  (,«     MO 

£2  f_  h  io  n  eo    mm    wm  n  t-  q  q  ^  o    mm 

S   CO  >-H    CO*    M  '  H        '  Hi-1  'h 
HH   M 

>-^t-  Oho:  oi'f    isif    tea  wn  Oio  m.n    m^i 

<<  OS  «OMCDMM-^'M«OC-JCNIt^'-lOoo,l1,a5 

S  g  ^   M   M  •      •                        '      '^*      '^HH'^         '      ' 

5  -*t-«5M<X>cO',*OMT-i 

Mt(|     O  CD  Mo  N  M  eg  ^J 


< 

M 

« 

£ 

fc- 
CD 

3 

►J 

Hi 

•M 

3 

5 

CO 

© 

— 

J 

H 

-** 

O 

3 

05 

.-3 

- 

CO 

CM 

3 

CD 

~ 

- 

lO 

M  CO 


t-    i-H 

M  o 


<m  eg 


5   CO  Q* 

S  2  oo  5  "*  _5 


M  © 


- 

Eh 


Wffl 


rt^T3 


8e--s8^ 


a  n  co    as<M    osm    cdcd    q^t-    rj 

CO    t-;   h     "#  M     Tl<  M     t-;  Tj<     W  M     CM 

•h   m  ^i'  "     i— (      '     »— i 


CD  M 
O  M 


in  t- 


M     T* 


a 


a. S 


^   j^'   j^'   ^^   J^'   J^'   J^' 


b   d     41 

O      I  I  Ml 

-I       ^       M  L 


t3  CO  W    hj  ij  hj    Phj 


30 


Oh 


c 
a 

8    . 

s  ■* 

>»    CD 

S  3 
.5  « 

«l—     k. 


3   '" 


0-1  OJ    t—  C-  t-    CO  to  CO    t-  t—  t—    CM  CM  Ol 


O 
CD     CD 

■5  § 

OS  JS 


s    £ 


^>   o 
o  S 


-     ~ 


- 
< 


«-  C 


s-s   a 


cd  ~D 

a 


§     S      - 


5  to 
2  o  as 
§  ^h  m  n> 

f*  i-H  CO  ^ 

^  to 

«  o  <js 

«  o  to 

^  to 
"5  o  o 

5    ^H   <X>   Qj 
«    ^H    CO    ** 

Sgtf    OS 

2    5   "*    5    <0        j, 

§  ^h  io  »fl  <m  Q* 
S  ^  t?  Ph  ^ 

^  to-  S  2  j 

>£!   *  toM 
E>  t-<>3  cm 

m  C£  ^OS 
A  ©  ^  co 

^  t- 

<i  in  Qi 

Oh  ifl 


t-  «3  CM 
2  ©  CO 


^H  I— I 


oo    oo 

s  1 


S  «>  Oh 


co  i-h  Hcoa>  t»H^f  t-  as  as 
t--rj<   otoco   <M00  t-  co  oo  c- 


Moot- 


cm  co  as  t-  as  co  t-  to  i-H 

CM  CO  t-    IMCO00   CO  OS  00 


tO  tO  i-H     Oi-Hi-H     lO|-H^H 

©  m  to  co  oq  t-  ■**'.  as  c-_ 


11 


X) 

s  £ 


3  8.2 


CM  in  t-  CO  OCO   tOOO  tot— i-H   t-  ©  to  co  •■*  cm   lO  •**  t- 

■**  m  ioif  oo  m  -^  co  ©  in  to  noow  co  oq  t-;  n^n 


o        ^  ^  &  >i&&  Jfefc  ^  ^ 

p+*   h  -<Plh       <JDm       <0-»       ^J0h 

£0hJ 

a>  o  o    ^ 
C  c  c     i-c 

*  2  2  S  o 


o..n 


_   —        Oh        Oh 


bx 

a 

3 

— 

3 

C 

T3 

o 

a 

7. 

S 

_2 

IM 

« 

P. 

c 

c 

2 

3) 

3 

0) 

O 

a> 

CD 

^3 

a> 

a 

a> 

o 

e 

c 

c 

0 

tx 

% 

■»-> 

X 

~ 

gg 

ja 

o 

M 

— i 

CO 

en 
03 

c 

0) 

>> 

S 

C 

-a 

'ed 

c 

*3 

etl 

Z 

a 

3 

"c 

0) 

s 

o 

- 

m 

3 

« 

> 

t) 

0) 

J5 

£ 

+-> 

-t-> 

s 

-G 

o 

U 

«*-< 

3 
^ 

"8 

4-> 

— 

b 

C 

s 

oo 

s 

q 

CD 

« 

t- 

£ 

a 

'8 

& 

a^ 

GO 

H 

31 


32  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

TABLE  2b.    Measurements  of  lower  teeth  of  Planigale  ingrami  for 
comparison  with  those  of  Antechinus  maculalus  and  the  Madura  form. 


Species  and 

Planigale  : 

ingrami 

Trench, 
Unit  and  Lc 

^ 

ivel 

FMNH  AMNH 

AMNH 

AMNH 

Specimen  numbers 

66973 

160066 

160307-8 

160311-2 

N 

Mean 

Side 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

Distance  from 

front  of  F 

'xtO 

front  of  MT 

.38 

.08 

.19 

3 

.22 

L.  MT_4 

4.03 

3.89 

3.75 

4.03 

3.96 

4.22 

6 

3.98 

PT  or  2 

L. 

.55 

.55 

.57 

.57 

.53 

.55 

6 

.55 

W. 

.36 

.42 

.34 

.38 

.46 

.46 

6 

.40 

Pa 

L. 

.70 

.72 

.72 

.72 

.68 

.61 

6 

.69 

W. 

.42 

.46 

.38 

.49 

.46 

.49 

6 

.45 

P? 

L. 

.44 

.30 

.48 

.48 

4 

.43 

W. 

.32 

.27 

.34 

.42 

4 

.34 

MT 

L. 

.95 

.99 

.95 

1.01 

.99 

1.03 

6 

.99 

AW. 

.51 

.57 

.46 

.55 

.59 

— 

5 

.54 

PW. 

.57 

.59 

.51 

.61 

.61 

.61 

6 

.58 

M5 

L. 

1.18 

1.14 

1.10 

1.14 

1.14 

1.14 

6 

1.14 

AW. 

.68 

.68 

.65 

.68 

.72 

.72 

6 

.69 

PW. 

.62 

.68 

.61 

.65 

.68 

.68 

6 

.65 

M5 

L. 

1.16 

1.10 

1.05 

1.18 

1.14 

1.16 

6 

1.13 

AW. 

.68 

.70 

.72 

.72 

.80 

.76 

6 

.73 

PW. 

.57 

.57 

.53 

.63 

.57 

.68 

6 

.59 

M? 

L. 

.98 

.95 

.93 

1.05 

.99 

1.10 

6 

1.00 

AW. 

.58 

.53 

.53 

.61 

.57 

.68 

6 

.58 

PW. 

.27 

.17 

.23 

.25 

.19 

.23 

6 

.22 

gale  tenuirostris  in  south-central  Queensland  and  northeast  New 
South  Wales. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 


The  following  people  generously  provided  space,  facilities,  and 
information:  Prof.  H.  Waring,  Dr.  A.  R.  Main,  Dr.  J.  Shield,  of  the 
University  of  Western  Australia;  Dr.  W.  D.  L.  Ride,  Dr.  D.  Mer- 
rilees,  of  the  Western  Australian  Museum;  Profs.  A.  J.  Marshall,  J. 
Warren,  Dr.  A.  K.  Lee,  of  Monash  University;  Dr.  J.  Jennings  of 
the  Australian  National  University,  Canberra;  Mr.  J.  Calaby,  of 
CSIRO,  Canberra;  Mr.  K.  Quartermaine  and  Mr.  H.  Wheeler,  of 
the  School  of  Mines,  Kalgoorlie,  W.  A.,  and  Mr.  G.  F.  U.  Baker, 
Research  Officer,  Main  Roads  Department,  Western  Australia. 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  33 

Prof.  Warren,  Dr.  and  Mrs.  Lee,  and  Mr.  L.  Van  der  Velde  pro- 
vided assistance  in  the  field,  as  did  our  wives. 

The  following  persons  provided  technical  assistance  in  the  prepa- 
ration and  cataloguing  of  the  material  and  manuscript  preparation: 
Mrs.  M.  Littlejohn,  Miss  Ethel  Butler,  Miss  Susan  Deutsch,  Mr.  E. 
Krish,  Mr.  J.  Joy,  Mr.  and  Mrs.  D.  Witter,  Mr.  and  Mrs.  M.  Col- 
lins, Mr.  B.  Davidson,  Mrs.  K.  Cooper,  Mr.  F.  Corral,  Dr.  T.  Per- 
enyi,  Mrs.  W.  Reinders,  Mrs.  R.  Keppler,  and  Mrs.  W.  Krueger. 

We  are  especially  grateful  for  the  assistance  and  encouragement 
of  our  wives  in  every  stage  of  the  work. 

The  work  was  made  possible  by  the  financial  support  of  Grants 
GB  975,  GB  3729,  GB  7662  from  the  National  Science  Foundation; 
Field  Museum  of  Natural  History;  and  from  the  Geology  Founda- 
tion of  the  University  of  Texas.  The  writing  was  done  while  Lun- 
delius  was  on  a  research  leave  sponsored  by  the  University  Research 
Institute  of  the  University  of  Texas. 

The  Radiocarbon  Laboratory  of  the  University  of  Texas  ran  the 
C-14  dates.  We  thank  Mr.  S.  Valastro,  Director  of  the  laboratory, 
for  this  important  service. 

REFERENCES 

Bensley,  B.  A. 

1903.  On  the  evolution  of  the  Australian  Marsupialia;  with  remarks  on  the 
relationships  of  the  marsupials  in  general.  Trans.  Linnean  Soc,  London, 
ser.  2,  9,  Zool.,  pp.  83-216,  figs.  1-6,  pis.  5-7. 

David,  T.  W.  E.  and  W.  R.  Browne 

1950.  The  geology  of  the  Commonwealth  of  Australia.  Edward  Arnold  &  Co., 
London.    Vol.  1,  xx,  747  pp.;  Vol.  2,  iv,  618  pp.;  Vol.  3,  geologic  maps. 

Frost,  M.J. 

1958.  Jointing  associated  with  the  Hampton  Fault  near  Madura,  W.  A.  Jour. 
Roy.  Soc.  W.  Austral.,  Perth,  41,  no.  1,  pp.  23-26. 

Gentilli,  J. 

1961.  Quaternary  climates  of  the  Australian  region.  Ann.  N.  Y.  Acad.  Sci., 
95,  pp.  465-501. 

Glauert,  L. 

1912.  Fossil  remains  from  Balladonia  in  the  Eucla  Division.  Rec.  W.  Austral. 
Mus.,  1,  no.  2,  pp.  47-65. 

Haynes,  C.  V. 

1968.  Radiocarbon:  Analysis  of  Inorganic  Carbon  of  Fossil  Bone  and  Enamel. 
Science,  161,  pp.  687-688. 


34  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  31 

Hershkovitz,  P. 

1971.  Basic  crown  patterns  and  cusp  homologies  of  mammalian  teeth,  pp.  95- 
150.  In  Dahlberg,  A.  A.,  ed.,  Dental  morphology  and  evolution,  Univ.  of 
Chgo.  Press,  Chicago,  350  pp. 

Jennings,  J.  N. 

1963.  Some  geomorphological  problems  of  the  Nullarbor  Plain.  Trans.  Roy. 
Soc.  South  Austral,  87,  pp.  41-62. 

Ludbrook,  N.  H. 

1958a.    The  stratigraphic  sequence  in  the  western  portion  of  the  Eucla  Basin. 

Jour.  Roy.  Soc.  W.  Austral.,  Perth,  41,  no.  4,  pp.  108-114. 
1958b.     The  Eucla  Basin  in  South  Australia,  pp.  127-135.    In  Glaessner  and 

Parkin,  ed.,  The  Geology  of  South  Australia,  Melbourne  Univ.  Press,  163  pp. 

Lundelius,  E.  L.  Jr. 

1957.  Additions  to  knowledge  of  the  ranges  of  Western  Australian  mammals. 
W.  Austral.  Nat.,  5,  no.  7,  pp.  173-182. 

1963.  Vertebrate  remains  from  the  Nullarbor  caves,  Western  Australia.  Jour. 
Roy.  Soc.  W.  Austral.,  Perth,  46,  no.  3,  pp.  75-80. 

Main,  A.  R.,  A.  K.  Lee,  and  M.  J.  Littlejohn 

1958.  Evolution  in  three  genera  of  Australian  frogs.  Evolution,  12,  pp.  299- 
304. 

Merrilees,  D. 

1968.  Man  the  destroyer.  Late  Quaternary  changes  in  the  Australian  Mar- 
supial Fauna.    Jour.  Roy.  Soc.  W.  Austral.,  Perth,  51,  no.  1,  pp.  1-24. 

Ride,  W.  D.  L. 

1964.  A  review  of  Australian  fossil  marsupials.  Jour.  Roy.  Soc.  W.  Austral., 
Perth,  47,  no.  4,  pp.  97-131. 

1970.  A  guide  to  the  native  mammals  of  Australia.  Oxford  Univ.  Press,  xiv, 
249  pp. 

Serventy,  D.  L. 

1951.  The  evolution  of  the  chestnut-shouldered  wrens  (Malurus).  Emu,  51, 
pp. 113-120. 

1953.  Some  speciation  problems  in  Australian  birds.    Emu,  53,  pp.  131-145. 

Singleton,  O.  P. 

1954.  The  Tertiary  stratigraphy  of  Western  Australia — a  review.  Proc.  Pan 
Ind.  Ocean  Sci.  Congr.,  1st.,  Perth,  1954;  Sect.  C.  Geol.,  pp.  59-65. 

Tate,  R. 

1879.  The  natural  history  of  the  country  around  the  head  of  the  Great  Austral- 
ian Bight.    Trans.  Royal  Soc.  S.  Austral.,  2,  pp.  94-128. 

Trewartha,  G.  T. 

1954.    An  introduction  to  climate.    McGraw-Hill,  New  York.,  vii,  402  pp. 


LUNDELIUS  AND  TURNBULL:  MADURA  CAVE  35 

Turnbull,  W.  D. 

1971.  The  Trinity  therians:  their  bearing  on  evolution  in  marsupials  and  other 
therians,  pp.  151-179.  In  Dahlberg,  A.  A.,  ed.,  Dental  morphology  and 
evolution,  Univ.  of  Chgo.  Press,  Chicago,  350  pp. 

VandeBroek,  G. 

1961.  The  comparative  anatomy  of  the  teeth  of  lower  and  nonspecialized  mam- 
mals. Intl.  Colloq.  Evol.  Mammals.  Kon  VI.  Acad.  Wetensch.  Lett.  Sch. 
Kunsten  Belgie,  Brussels.  Pp.  215-320  (part  1);  pis.  1-44  (part  2). 

1964.  Recherches  sur  l'origine  des  mammiferes.  Ann.  Soc.  Roy.  Zool.  Belg., 
94,  pp.  117-160. 

WoOLNOUGH,  W.  G. 

1933.  Report  on  aerial  survey  operations  in  Australia  during  1932.  Canberra, 
Commonwealth  Govt.  Printer.  83  pp.