Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at |http: //books .google .com/I
,, ■ # . ^ ■'■■
THE
MATHEMATICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL
WORKS
OFT^E
RIGHT REV, JOHN WILKINS,
LATE LQKD BISHQP OF CHISTEI.
TO WHICH IS PREFIXED
THE AUTHOR'S LIFE,
AND
AN AC<;OUNX OF HIS WORKS.
• - I
IN TWO VOLUMES.
VOL. I.
CONTAINING,
I, The Discovery of ■"New World: or,
a Disc jurse tendiog to prove, that it
}§ probable there may be another
Habitable World in (he Moon. With
a Discourse of the Possihility of a
Passage tluther.
II. That it is probable our Earth is one
of the Planets.
LONDON:
PRINTED BY C. WHITTINCHAM,
Dtan Street, Fetttr LarUf
FOR VERNOR AND HOOD, POULTRY j CUTIIELL, AND MARTIN. MIDDLE-ROW^
HOLBORN J AND J. WALKER, PA1ERN05TER-ROW.
*:«^
1802.
7^ 3
/ /.
L..
THE
LIFE OF THE AUTHOR
AND AN
ACCOUNT OF HIS WRITINGS.
TTTE was son to Walter Wilkins, citizen and gold-
smith of Oxford ; yras bom at Fawlsly, near
Daventry, in Northamptonshire, in the house of the
reverend and yrell ki;own Mr, John Dod, who
wrote upon the commandments, he being his
grandfather by the mother's side. He was taught
his Latin and Greek by Edward Sylvester, a noted
Greci?^n, who kept a private school in the parish
of All Saints in Oxford : his proficiency was suchj,
that at thirteen years of age he entered a student in
New-Inn, in Easter-term, 1627. He made no long
stay there, but was removed to Magdalen-Hall,
under the tuition of Mr. John Tombes, and there
Jie took his degrees in arts. He afterwards en-
tered into orders, and was first chaplain to William
a2
425907
IV THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.
Lord Say, and then to Charles Count Palatine of
the Rhine, and Prince Elector of the Empire, with
vrhom he continued for some time.
Upon the breaking out of the civil war, he
joined with the parliament, and took the splemo
league and covenant. He was afterguards made
warden of Wadham College by the committee of
parliament appointed for reforming the university;
and being created bachelor of divinity, April 12,
1648, was the day following put in possession of
his wardenship. Next year he was created doctor
of divinity, and about that time took the engage-
ment then enjoined by the powers in being.
In 1656, he married Robina, the widow of Peter
French, formerly canon of Christ-Church, sister
to Oliver, then Lord Protector. In 1659, he was
by Richard the Protector made head of Trinity
College in Cambridge, the best preferment in that
university.
After king Charles the lid's restoration, he was
ejected from thence, and became preacher to the
honourable society of Gray's-Inn, and minister of
St. Lawrence Jury, London, in the room of Dr.
Ward. About this time he became a member of
the royal society, was chosen one of their council,
And proved one of their most eminent members,
and chief benefactors. Soon after this he was
J
■ «
THE LIFE OP THE AUTHCR* V
irtade dean of Rippon, and by the interest of the
late duke of Buckingham, he was created bishop
df Chester, and consecrated in the chapel of Ely-
house in Holborn, the 15th of November, 1668,
by Dr. Cosin, bishop of Durham; Dr. Laney,
bishop of Ely; and Dn Ward, bishop of Salisbury ^
on which occasion Dr. Tillotson, afterwards arch-
bishop of Canterbury, preached an excellent
sermon.
He was a person of great natural endowments,
and by his indefatigable study attained to an uni-
versal insight into all, or at least most parts of use-
ful learning. He was a great mathematician, and
very much advanced the study of astronomy, both
while he was warden of Wadham College in Ox-
ford, and at London, when he was a member of
the royal society. He was as well seen in mecha-
nics and experimental philosophy as any man in
his time, and was a great promoter of them. In
divinity, which was his main business, he excelled,
and was a very able critic ; his talent of preaching
was admirable, and more suited to profit than to
please his hearers; he affected an apt and plain
way of speech, and expressed his conceptions in a
natural style. In his writings he was judicious
and plain, and valued not circumstances so much
as the substance. This appeared evident in what-
ever subject he undertook, which he always made
easier for those that came after him.
ti THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.
He treated sometimes on matters that did not
properly belong to his profession ; but always with
a design to make men wiser and better; which
was his chief end in promoting universal know-
ledge, and one of the main reasons for his entering
into the royal society. His virtues and graces
were very uncommon ; at least as to that degree of
them to which he attained : his prudence was very
remarkable, and seldom failed him ; but he was so
" openhearted and sincere himself, that he was ready
(except he knew some cause to the contrary) to
think other men to be so too; by. which he was
sometimes imposed on.
His greatness of mind was evident to all that
knew any thing of him, nor was the depth of his
judgment less discernible. He never was eager in
pursuit of dignities; but was advanced to them by
his merit. He contemned riches as much as others
admired them; and spent his ecclesiastical reve*
nues in the service of the church from which he
received them ; and being secured against want, he
would often say, that he would be no richer: and
his conduct made it evident that he was as good
as his word.
He was a stranger to revenge, and yet not in-
f sensible of personal injuries, especially such as re-
flected on his good name, if they proceeded from
such as had a good reputation of their own. The
if
THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR- VU
reproaches of others he despised; but frequently
wished he had been better understood by the
former: he bore it, however, patiently, as his mis-
fortune; never requited them with the like mea-
sure; but always mentioned them with respect,
and laid hold on all opportunities to oblige and do
them good.
His conversation was profitable and pleasant;
and his discourse was commonly of useful things;
without occasioning trouble or weariness in those
that conversed with him. He cultivated that most
necessary (but too much neglected) part of friend-
ship, to give seasonable reproof, and wholesome
advice, upon occasion. This he did with a great
deal of freedom ; but with so much calmness and
prudence, that it seldom gave offence.
He was particularly careful of the reputati9n of
his friends; and would suffer no blot to lie upon
the good name or memory of any of them, if he
could help it.
His enemies, who were strangers to moderation
themselves, made that virtue in which he excelled,
the chief subject of their reproaches, as if he had
been a person of unsteady principles, and not fixed
in matters of religion; this drew severe censures
upon him from archbishop Sheldon*) bishop Fell,
and archbishop Dolben, &c. without considering
Vm THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.
that he could not but have a great deal of charity
for dissenters, by reason of his education under Mr.
John Dod his grandfather, a truly pious and learned-
man; who dissented in many things from the
church of England long before the separation which
afterwards followed upon archbishop Laud's seve-
rities and new impositions.
And as his said grandfather never approved of
the extremities on the other side, but continued
loyal to the last, and advised others to continue in
their allegiance; in like manner Doctor Wilkins,
• (though he had clearness when the government
was dissolved, to submit to the powers then in
being, by which he procured an interest and Jt'
share in the government of both universities ;) was
always a friend to those who were loyal, and con-
tinued well affected to the church of England, and
protected several of them by the interest he had in
the then government.
After the restoration he conformed himself to the
church of England, and stood up for her govern-
ment and liturgy ; but disliked vehemence in little
and unnecessary things, and freely censured it as
fanatacism on both sides.
Having thus conformed to the church himself, he
was very willing to bring over others : in which he
was not without success, especially in his own
TflE LIFE OF, THE AUTHOR, IX
diocese; where the extremes on both si4es were
a^ remarkable, as in most parts of the nation. Being
a person of extensive charity hinrself, he was for
an indulgence and a comprehension, in order to
have brought our divisions in matters of religion
to a conclusion ; which drew upon him the hatred
and obloquy of those who were for contrary raea-
sures.
His indefatigable pains in study brought the
stone upon him ; which proved incurable. He had
for many days a prospect of death; which he
viewed in its approaches, and gradual advances
upon him : and a few days before his dissolution,
he frequently said, that he found a sentence of
death within himself. But in the height of his
pain and apprehensions of death, he shewed no
dismay or surprise, nor was ever heard to utter a
word unbecoming a wise man, or a true christian.
And thus he concluded his days with constancy of
mind, contempt of the world, and cheerful hopes of
a blessed eternity, through faith in our Lord Jesus
Christ. He died in the house of his friend Dr.
Tillotson, in Chancery-lane in London, on the l9th
of November, 1672; and was buried on the 12th
of December following, under the north wall of
the chancel of the church of St. Lawrence Jewry,
where he had formerly been minister. His funeral
sermon vvas preached by Dr. William Lloyd, then
dean of Bangor, (afterward Lord Bishop of Worces-
ter) at the Guildhall chapel in London ; by which.
X THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.
those who are curious may be satisfied, that every
part of the character here given him, may be jus-
tified to advantage.
As a further proof of it, and particularly of hh
unwearied endeavours to promote universal know-
ledge, it is proper to subjoin a catalogue of his
works.
The first was entitled,
1. The Discovery of a New World; or, a Dis-
course tending to prove, that it is probable there
may be another habitable World in the Moon.
Printed at London, in quarto, 1638, and had four
editions, the last in 1684.
2. Discourse concerning the Possibility of a Pas-
sage to the World in the Moon. Printed with the
Discovery.
3. Discourse concerning a New Planet ; tending
to prove, that it is probable our Earth is one of the
Planets. London, 1640, in octavo.
The author's name is put to none of the three ; but
they were so well known to be his, that Lan-
grenus, in his map of the moon, (dedicated to
the king of Spain) calls one of the spots of his
selenographic map after his name.
4. Mercury; or, the Secret Messenger: shew-
ing how a Man may with Privacy and Speed com-
THE LIFE OF THE AUTflOH. Xl
municate his Thoughts to his Friend at any Dis-
tance. London, 164PP'^The publication of this
was occasioned by the writing of a little thing,
called Nuncius Inanimatus, by Francis Goodwin.
5. Mathematical Magic ; or, the Wonders that
may be performed by Mechanical Geometry. In
two books. Printed at London in 1648, and
1680, in octavo.
6. Ecclesiastes ; or, A Discourse of the Gift of
Preaching, as it falls under the Rules of Art.
London, 1646, 1647, 1651, 1653, and 1675, oc-
tavo.
7. Discourse concerning the Beauty of Provi-
dence, in all the rugged Passages of it. I-ondon,
1649, in twelves; and in 1677, the fifth edition, in
octavo.
8. Discourse concerning the Gift of Prayer ;
shewing what it is ; wherein it consists ; and how
far it is . attainable by Industry, Sec. London,
1653, and 1674, octavo.
9. Of the Principles and Duties of Natural Re-
ligion. Two books. London, 1675, octavo. Pub-
lished by John TiUotson, D. D.
10. Sermons preached upon several Occasions.
London, 1682, octavo. They are in number fif-
teen, published by Dr. TiUotson.
■*
i
XU THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.
11. Essay towards a Real Character, and a Phi-
losophical Language. London, 1668, folio.
12. An Alphabetical Dictionary: wherein all
English Words, according to their various Signi-
fications, are either referred to their Places in the
Philosophical Tables, or explained by such Words
as are in those Tables. This is printed with the
Essay.
•j
I
CONTENTS.
1.
VOL. I.
BOOK J.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
PROPOSITION I.
Pago
Xhat the strangeness of this opinion is no sufficient reason
"why it should be rejected ; because other certain
truths have been formerly esteemed ridiculous, and
great absurdities entertained by .'common consent.
By way of Preface 3
XL That a plurality of worlds does not contradict any prin-
ciple of reason or faith 13
in. That the heavens do not consist of any fuch pure mat-
ter whjcb can privilege them from the like change and
, corruption, as these inferior bodies are liable unto 23
IV. That the moon is a solid, compacted^ opaceous body 32
> ■ ...
V^ That the moon hath not any light of her own 36
VI. That there is a world in the mo(to, hath been the direct
opinion of many ancient, withsom^^mpdern mathema-
ticians ; and may probably be' deduced from the te-
nets of others .*„..*.!. ...^....v 43
yW. That those spots and brighter I>arts> yrhich by our sight
may be distinguished in Uie.moon,. do shew the dif-
ference betwixt the sea anduuld in that other world ... 51
■ ■..■■■■;,:. P
• k. ■
• ■'"■.■ ■ ■ . ■ .
■ . ■„ • . ■
• ■■
•^ ■ » • .
• ■ If* f «>
XIV CONTENTS.
VIII. That the spots represent the sea, and the brighter parii
the land SS
IX. That there are high mountains, deep vallies, and spacious
plains in the body of the moon dS
X. That there is an atmosphzra, or an orb of gross vapo-
rous air, immediately compassing the body of the
moon 75
XL That as their world is our moon, so our world is their
moon 79
XII. That it is probable there may be such meteors belong-
ing to that world in the moon^ as there are with us ... 90
XIII. That it is probable there may be inhabitants in this
other world ; but of what kind they are is uncertain • • 1 00
XrV. That.it is possible for some of our posterity to find out
a conveyance to this other world ; and, if there be
inhabitants therci to have commerce with them 109
I •
BOOK II.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
■»
PROPOSITION I.
That the seeming novelty and singularity of this opinion can
be no sufficient reason to prove it erroneous 135
II. That the places of scripture vhich seem to intimate the
diurnal motion of the sua or heavens, are fairly capable
of another interpretation 149
III. That the holy ghost in many places of scripture does .,
plainly conform his expressions to the error of our con-
ceits, and does not speak of sundry things as they are
in themselves, but as they appear unto us 159
IV. That divers learned men have fallen into great absur-
dities, Avhilst they have looked for the grounds of phi-
losophy from the words of scripture 174
V. That the v^ords of scripture, in their proper and strict
construction, do not anywhere affirm the immobility
of the earth 181
VI. That there is not any argument from the words of scrip-
ture, principles of nature, or observations in astronomy,
vrhich can sufficiently evidence the earth to be in the
centre of the universe 189
VII. It is probable that the sun is in the centre of the
world 203
VIII. That there is not any sufficient reason to prove the
earth incapable of those motions which Copernicus
ascribes unto it ..• 205
IX. That it is more probid|le the earth does move than the
heavens 231
X» ^at this hypothesis is exactly agreeable to common ap-
pearances ..../ , 243
•-■ ■
TO
THE READER.
TF ama-ngst thy leisure haurst thou canst spare am/ for
the perusal of this Discourse^ and dost look to find some-
what in it which may serve for thy information and benefit ;
let me then advise thee to come unto it with an equal mind^
Tiet swayed by prejudice^ but indifferently resolved to assent
unto that truth which upon deliberation shall seem most
probable unto thy reason ; and then I doubt not, but either
thou wilt agree with me in this as^ertiont or at lekst not
think it to be as for from truths as it is from common
opinion.
Two cautions there are, which I would willingly, admo*
nish thee of in the beginning :
1 • That thou shouldst not here look to find an exact ac--
curate treatise ; since this discourse was but the fruit of
some lighter studies ^ and those too huddled up in a short
time ; being first thought of and finished in the space qf
some few weeks ; and therefore you cannot in reason expect
that it should be so polished^ as perhaps the subject would
require^or the leisure of the author might have done it.
2. To remember that /promise only probable arguments
for the proof of this opinion ; and therefore you must not
look that every consequence should be of an undeniable de^
pendance ; or that the truth qf each argument should be
measured by its necessity. I grants that some astronomic
cal appearances may possibly be solved otherwise than here
they are : but the thing I aim at is this : that probably
they may so be solved^ as I have here set them down*
fVhichy if it be granted (as J think it must) then 1 doubt
TWtf but the indifferent reader mil find some satisfaction in
the main thing that is to be proved.
TO THE READEIU
Mary ancient philosophers of the better note have for*
merly defended this assertion which I have here laid down;
and it were to be wished^ that same of us would more apply
our endeavours unto the examinatum of these old opinions;
which, though they have for a long tinie lain neglected by
others, yet in them you may find many t^iiths well worthy
your pains and observation. It is a false conceit, for us to
think that amongst the ancient variety and search of opi^
nions, the best hath still prevailed. Time (saith the learned
Verulam) seems to be of tl^t nature of a river or stream;
which carrieth down to us that which is light, or blown up^
but sinketh that which is weighty and solid.
It ii my desire, that by the occasion of this discourse^ I
may raise up some more active spirit to a search after other
hidden and unknown truths : since it must needs be a great
impediment unto the growth of sciences, for men still to plod
on upon beaten principles, as to be afraid of entertaining
any thing that inay seem to contradict them. An unwil^
lingness to take such things into examination is one of
those errors of learning, in these times observed by the ju--
dicious Verulam. Questionless there are many secret truths
which the ancients have passed aver, that are yet left to
make some of our age famous for their discovery.
If by this occasion I m>ay provoke any reader to an at*
tempt of this nature, I shall think myself happy, and this
Work successful.
Farewell.
, ■'!'
r
^
BOOK I,
THE
DISCOVERY OF A NEW WORLD?
PK,
A DISCOURSE
TENDING TO PROVE, THAT (FT IS PROPABLE) THERE MAT BE ANOTHER
HABITABLE WORLP IN THE MOO]^,
WITH
n DISCOURSE CONCERNING THE POSSIBItlTr OF A PASSAGE THFTfiER.
VOL I.
B
■T-
■*;*
■■ i
BOOK I.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
PROP. I.
BY WAY OF PREFACE.
That the strangeness of this opinion is no sufficient reason
why it should be rejected; h^ause other certain truths
have been formerly esteemed ridiculous^ and great ab^
surdities entertained by common consent.
THERE is an earnestness and hungering after novelty,
which doth still adhere unto all our natures ; and it
is part of that primitive image, that wide extent and infinite
capacity at first created in the heart pf man. For this^
since its depravation in Adam, perceiving itself altogether
emptied of any good, doth now catch after every new things
conceiving that possibly it may find satisfaction among
some of its fellow creatures. But our enemy the devil
(who strives still to pervert our gifts, and beat us with our
own weapons) hath so contrived it, that any truth doth
now seem distasteful for that very reason, for which error
is entertained ; novelty. For let but some upstart heresy
be set abroach, and present^ there are some out of a
curious hymour ; others, as if they watched an occasion of
singularity, will take it up for canonical,. and make it part
of their creed and profession ; whereas solitary truth can-
not anywhere find |p ready entertainment ; but the same
:|jovelty which is esteemed the commendation of error, and
makes that acceptable, is counted the fault of truth, and
f:auses that to be rejected.
4 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
How did the incredulous world gaze at Columbus, when
he promised to discover another part of the earth i Ajid he
could not for a long time, by his confidence or arguments,
induce any of the christian princes, either to assent unto
his opinion, or go to the charges of an experiment. Now
if he, who had such good grounds for his assertion, could
find no better entertainment among the wiser sort, and
upper end of the world ; it is not likely then that this
opinion which I now deliver,, shall receive any thing fronn
the men of these days ; especially pur vulgar wits, but
misbelief or derision.
It hath always been the unhappiness of new truths in
philosophy, to be derided by those that are ignorant of the
causes of things ; and rejected by others, whose perverse-
ness ties them to the contrary opinion ; men whose envious
pride will not allow any new thing for trutli, which they
themselves were not the first inventors of. So that I may
justly. expect to be accused of a pragmatical ignorance, and
bold ostentation ; especially, since for this opinion Xeno-
phanes, a ihan whose authority was able to add some cre-
dit to his assertion, could not escape the like censure frona
others. For Natales Comes *, speaking of that philosopher,
and this his opinion, saith thus : Nonnulli n^ nihil scisse
videantuVf aliqiia nova monstra in philosophiam iniroducunt^
ut alicujus ret inventores fuisse appareant. " Some there
« are who lest they might seem to know nothing, wilj
'< bring up monstrous absurdities in philosophy, that so
" afterward they may be famed for the invention of somer
"what." The same author doth also in another place f
accuse Anaxagoras of folly for the same opinion. Est
enim non ignobilis gradus stultifue, vel si nescias quid dicaSf
tamen velle de rebus propositis hanc vel illajn partem
stabilire. " 'Tis none of the worst kinds of folly, boldly
" to affirm one side or other, when a man knows not what
« to say."
If these men were thus censured, I may justly then expec^ ^^
•/ w
* MythoL lib. 3. ci 17. t lib. V. c. 1.
tHAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 5
to be derided by most, and to be believed by few or none ;
especially since this opinion seems to carry in it so much
istrangeness, and contradiction to the general consent of
others. But however, I am resolved that tliis shall not be
any dikouragemeht, dince I know that it is not common
bpinion that can either add or detract from the truth. For,
1. Other truths have been formerly esteemed altogether
as ridiculous as this can be.
2. Gross absurdities have beeti entertained by general
bpinioii.
I shall ^ve an instance of each, that so I may the better
prepare the teader to consider things without a prejudice i
When he shall see that the common opposition against this
Which I affirm, cannot anyway derogate from its truth.
i. Other truths have been formerly accounted as ridi-
(culous as this. I shall specify that of the Antipodes, which
have beeii denied, and laughed at by many wise men and
great scholars; such as were Herodotus, Chrysostom,
Austin, Lactailtius, the venerable Bede, Lucretius the poet,
Procopius, and the voluminous Abulensis, together with all
those fathers or other authors who denied the roundness of
the heavens*. Herodotus counted it so horrible an ab*
Surdity, that he could Jlot forbear laughing to think of it.
FeXu Se o^tav yvig T^ipioisg 7;tf4^«n/rA^, TOhhiS ffi^ nut sieyaySoy
iXoyrccg ^^yvfrdyi^VQy oi CiKeecyovre ^eivrtt y^af^wn^ Tfj/^ rvpf re
y>jv twttif xuxAo reqect (oq ttnco roqvu. ** I cannot chuse but
** laugh, (saith he) to see sd many men venture to describe
'< the earth's icompass, relating tho^e things that are without
'* all sense : as that the sea flows about the world, and that
" the earth itself is round as an orb." But this great^ ig-
norance is not so much to be admit-ed in him, as in those
learned men of later times, when all sciences began to
flourish in the world. Such were St. Chrysostom, who in
his 14th homily upon the Epistle to the Hebrews, does
inake a challenge to any man that shall dare to defend that
•a^the heavens are round, and not rather as a tent. Thus
^ Vid. ioiep. Acoita, de nat. novi orbU| 1. 1* cap. 1 .
.. '
6 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
likewise St. Austin *, who censures that rdation of the
Antipodes to be an incredible fable ; and with him agrees
the eloquent Lactantiusf. 2uid illi qui esse contrarios
vestigiis nostris Antipodes putantf nu7n aliquid loguunturf
aut est quUpiam tarn ineptus^ qui credat esse homines^ quorum
vestigia sunt superiora quayn capita ? aut ibi qua apud nos
jacent inversa pendere f fruges SC arhores deorsum versus
crescerey pluvias K nives^ H gratidinein sursum versus cadere
in terram ? H miratur aliquis hortos pensUes inter sepiem
mira narrari^ quum philosophic Sf agros^ KmariUf K urbest
K 7nontes pensilesfaciunty fife. *' What (saith he) are they
that think there are Antipodes, such as walk with their
feet against ours ? do they speak any likelihood ; or is
" there any one so foolish as to believe that there are nacn
" whose heels are higher than their heads ? that things
** which with us do lie on the ground, do hang there?
'^ that the plants and trees grow downwards, that the hail,
'^ and rain, and snow fall upwards to the earth ? and do we
** admire the hanging orchards amongst the seven wonders,
<< whereas here the philosophers have made the fields and
<* seas, the cities and mountains hanging?" What shall we
think (saith he in Plut.) that men do cling to that place
like worms, or hang by their claws as cats ? or if we sup-
pose a man a little beyond the centre, to be digging with a
spade, is it likely (as it must be according to this opinion)
that the earth which he loosened, should of itself ascend
upwards? Or else suppose two men with their middles
about the centre, the feet of the one being placed where
the head of the other is, and so two other men cross them ;
yet all these men thus situated, according to tliis opinion
should stand upright ; and many other such gross conse-
quences would follow (saith he) which a false imagination
is not able to fancy as possible. Upon which considera-
tions, Bede also denies the being of any Antipodes, Nequt
enim Antipodaruyn uUatenus est fabulis accornmodandus
* De civit. Dei, I. 16. cap. 9, f Instiiut. 1. 3. cap. 34.
THAT The moon may.be a WOULIJ. 7
nssemas*. "^Nor should we any longer assent to the fable
" of Antipodes." So also Lucretius the poet speaking of
the same subject, says,
Sed vantis stdlidis hiec omnia finxeril error \.
That some idle fancy feigned these for fools to believe.
Df this opinion was Procopius Gazaeus J ; but he was per-
isuaded to it by another kind of reason; for he thought that
all the earth uiider us was sunk in the water, according to
the saying of the Psalmist, He hath founded the earth upon
the seas^ ; and therefore he accounted it not inhabited by
any* Nay^ Tostatus, a man of later years and general
learning, doth also confidently deny that there are aily
such Antipodes, though the reason which he urges for it be
not so absurd aS the former ; for the apostles, saith he,
travelled through thie whole habitable world, but they never
parsed the equinoctial || : and if you answer, that they are
said to go through all the earth, because they went through
all the known world • he replied; That this is not sufficient,
^ince Christ would have all men to be saved, and come to
th^ knowledge of his truth ^T* and therefore it is requisite
that they should have travelled thither also, if there had
been any inhabitants; especially since he did expressly
command them to go and teach all nations, and preach the
goispel through the whole world** i and therefore he thinks,
that as there are no men, so neither are there seas, or
rivers, or any other conveniency for habitation ft* It is com-
iiionly related of one Virgilius, that he was excommuni-
cated and condemned for a heretic by Zachary bishop of
Rome, because he was not of the same opinion. But
Barbnius says J J, it was because he thought there was ano-
ther habitable world within ours. However, you may well
enough discern in these examples, how confident many of
these great scholars were in so gross an error ; * how un-
* De ratione temponim, cap. 32. f De nat. rerum, lib. 1.
X Comment, in 1 cap. Gen. § Psalm xxiv. 2.
\\ Comment, in 1 Gen. If I Tim.ii. 4. ** Matt, xxviii. 19.
tt A ventinus Annal. Boiorum, Ub. 3. Xt Annal, Eccles. A. D. 748.
8 THAT TH£ MOON MAY BE A WORLD*
likdy, what an incredible thing it $eeroed to them» that
there should be any Antipodes ; and yet now this truth is
as certain and plain, as sense or demonstration can make it
This then which I now deliver, is not to be rejected, though
it may seem to contradict the common opinion*
2. Gross absurdities have been entertained by general
consent. I might instance in many remarkable examples,
but I will only speak of the supposed labour of the moon
in her eclipses, because this is nearest to tlie chief matter
in hand, and was received as a common opinion amongst
many of the ancients ; insomuch, that from hence they
stiled eclipses by the name of vftdi), passions, or in the
phrase of the poets,
Sohs lufueque labores.
And therefore Plutarch speaking of a lunary eclipse, relates,
that at such times it was a custom amongst the Romans,
(the most civil and learned people in the world) to sound
brass instruments, and hol^ great torches toward the hea-
ven*. Twv Is Fuiutiuv («0Tc; eqiu fvo|Euqui£VOv) %ftAK9 tb
'marofyotg M;«)caA8|Xfv«v to (t>u( M/r^g yuu %vpct xqKXm SaXotg nuu
iofffftv av«%ovT«v vpog Tov speevov* For by this means they
supposed the moon was much eased in her labours ; and
therefore Ovid calls such loud instruments, the auxiliaries
or helps of the moon,
Cumfrustra resonant ara atixiliaria lun^\.
And therefore the satyrist too, describing a loud scold, says.
She was able to make noise enough to deliver the labouring
moon.
Utia laboranti poterit succurrere lume J.
Now the reason of all this their ceremony, was, because
they feared the world would fall asleep, when one of ita
eyes began to wink, and therefore they would do what they
could by loud sounds to rouse it from its drowsiness, and
keep it awake; by bright torches, to bestow that light
upon it which it began to lose.
* In vita Paul .£inil. f Metam. lib. 4. % Juveh. Sat. 6.
..■ 6
THAT THE m60K MAY B£ A WO&LD. ■ '^ .
•
Some of tbem thought hereby to keep the moon in %^
orb, whereas otherwise she would have fallen down upon
the earth, and the world would have lost one of its lights;
for the credulous people believed that inchanters and witches
could bring the moon down; which made Virgil say,
Cantus SC I aelopossunt deducere lunam.
And those wizards knowing the times of her eclipses, would
then threaten to shew their skill, by pulling her out of her
orb. So that when the silly multitude saw that she began
to look red, they presently feared they should lose the
benefit of her light, and therefore made a great noise that
she might not hear the sound of those charms, which
would otherwise bring her down ; and this is rendered for
a reason of this custom by Pliny and Propertius * ;
Cantus SC i curru hmam deducere tentant,
Et/acererit, si non ttra repuisa soneni,
Plutarch gives another reasoit of it; and he says, it Is
because they would hasten the moon out of the dark shade
wherein she was involved, that so she might bring away
the souls of those saints that inhabit within her, which cry
out by reason they are then deprived of their wonted hap-
piness, and cannot hear the music of the spheres ; but are
forced to behold the torments and wailings of those damned
souls which are represented to them as they are tortured
in the region of the air. But whether this, or whatever
else was the meaning of this superstition, yet certainly it
was a very ridiculous custom, and bewrayed a great igno-
rance of those ancient times ; especially since it was not
only received by the vulgar, such as were men of less note
and learning, but believed also by the more famous and
wiser sort ; such as were those great poets, Stesichorus and
Pindar : and not only amongst the more sottish heathens,
who might account that planet to be one of their gods,
but the primitive christians also were in this kind guilty ;
which made St. Ambrose so tartly to rebuke those of hi$
* Nat, Hist. lib. 2. cap. 117.
.>.
* < ■ ■
10 TrtAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOULD;
time, when he said, Tuyn turbatur carminibm globus lunal
quando calicibiis turbantur 5f oculi. " When your heads
" are troubled with cups, then you think the moon to be
** troubled with charms.'*
And for this reason also did Maximus *^ a bishop, write a
homily against it, wherein he shewed the absurdity of that
foolish superstition. I remember that Ludovicus Vives
relates a more ridiculous story of a people that imprisoned
an ass for drinking up the moon, whose image appearing
in the water, was covered with a cloud as the ass Was drink*
ing ; for which the poor beast was afterward brought to the
bar, to receive a sentence according to his deserts j where
the grave senate being set to examine the matter, one of
the counsel (perhaps wiser than the rest) rises up, and out
of his deep judgment, thinks it not fit that their town should
lose its moon, but that rather the ass should be cut up, and
that taken out of him ; which sentence being approved by
the rest of those politicians, as the subtilest way for the
conclusion of the matter, was accordingly performed. But
whether this tale were true or no, 1 will not question j
however, there is absurdity enough in that former custom
of the ancients, that may confirm the truth to be proved^
and plainly declare the insufficiency of common opinion to
add true worth or estimation unto any thing. So that from
that which I have said, may be gathered thus much^
1. That a new truth may seem absurd and impossible^
not only to the vulgar, but to those also who are otherwise'
wise men and excellent scholars : and hence it will follow^
that every new thing which seems to oppose common
principles, is net presently to be rejected, but rather to be
pryed into with a diligent enquiry, since there are many
things which are yet hid from us, and reserved for future
discovery.
2. That it is not the commonness of an opinion that can
privilege it for a truth ; the wrong way is sometimes a well
beaten path, whereas the right way (especially to liidden
truths) may be less trodden and more obscure.
* Turinen^. Episc*
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLb. U
True indeed, the strangeness of this opinion will detract
touch from its credit ; but yet we should know that nothing
is in itself strange, since every natural effect has an equal,
dependance upon its cause, and with the like necessity doth
follow from it ; so that it is our ignorance which makes
things appear so : and hence it comes to pass, that many
more evident truths seem incredible, to such who kndW
not the causes of things. You may as soon persuade some
country peasants that the moon is made of green cheese,
(as we say) as that it is bigger than his cart-wheel, since
both seem equally to contradict his sight, and he has not
rea:ison enough to lead him farther than his senses. Nay,
suppose (saith Plutarch) a philosopher should be educated
in such a secret pl^e, where he might not see either sea
or, river, and afterwards should be brought out where one
might shew him the great ocean, telling him the quality of
that water, that it is brackish, salt, and not portable, and
yet there were many vast creatures of all forms living in it,
which make use of the water as we do of the air ; question^
less he would laugh at all this, as being monstrous lies and
fables, without any colour of truth. Just so will this truth
which I now deliver appear unto others, because we never
dreamt of any such matter as a world in the moon ; be-
cause the state of that place hath as yet been veiled from
our knowledge, therefore we can scarcely assent to any
such matter. Things are very hardly received, which are
altogether strange to our thoughts and our senses. The
soul may with less difficulty be brought to believe any ab-
surdity, when as it has formerly, been acquainted with some
colours and probabilities for it ; but when a new, and sui un-
heard of truth shall come before it, though it have good
grounds and reasons, yet the understanding is afraid of it
as a stranger, and dares not admit it into his belief, without
a great deal of reluctancy and trial. And besides, things,
that are not manifested to the senses, are not assented unto
without someJabour of mind, some travel and discourse of
the understanding ; and many lazy souls had rather quietly
repose themselves in an easy error, than take pains to
is tit AT THE teOOK MAY BE A WOitfi^
•
seaith out the truth. The strangeness then of this opmioi
which I now deliveri will be a great hindrance to its belief i
but this is not to be respected^ by reason it cannot be
helped. I have stood the longer in the Pre&ce, becausfe
that prejudice which the mere title of the book may bege^
cannot easily be removed without a great deal of prepara-
tion : and I could not tell otherwise how to rectify th6
thoughts of the reader, for an impartjial survey of the foU
lowing discourse.
I must needs confess, though I had ofted thought with
myself that it was possible there might be a world in the
moon, yet it seemed such an uncouth opinion, that I nerer
durst discover it, for fear of being counted singular and
ridiculous ; but afterward, having read Plutarch, Galileus^
Keplar, with some others, and finding many of mine bwii
thoughts confirmed by such strong authority, I then con^
eluded that it was not only possible there might be» but
probable that there was another habitable world in that
planet. In the prosecuting of this asserdon, I shall first
endeavour to clear the way from such doubts asmay hinder
the speed or ease of farther progress. And because the
suppositions implied in this opinion, may seem to contra-
dict the principles of reason or faith, it will be requisite
that I first remove this scruple, shewing the conformity of
them to both these, and proving those truths that may
make way for the rest ; which I shall labour to perform in
the second, third, fourth, and fifth chapters, and then pro-*
ceed to confirm such propositions which do more directly
belong to the main point in»hand«
t
»/
THAT THE MOQN MAY BE A WORLD. 13
PROP. II.
That a plurality of worlds doth not contradict any fvin^
ciplc of reason or faith.
r^ is reported of Aristotle, that when he saw the books
of Moses, he commended them for such a majestic stil^
as might become a god ; but withal, he censured that
manner of writing to be very unfitting for a philosopher ;
because there was nothing proved in them, but matters
were deliverer} as if they would rather command than per-
suade belief. And it is observed, that he sets down nothing
loimself, but he confirms it by the strongest reasons that
may be found, there being scarce an argument of force for
any subject in philosophy, which may not be picked out of
his writings; and therefore it is likely if there were in
reason a necessity of one only world, that he would have
found out some such necessary proof as might confirm it ;
especially since he labours for it so much in two whole
(chapters. But now all the arguments which he himself
urges in this subject, are very weak, and far enough from
having in them any convincing power*. Therefore it is
likely that a plurality of worlds doth not contradict any
principle of reason. However, I will set down the two
chief of his aiguments from his own works, and from them
you may guess the force of the other.
The first is this f : Since every heavy bddy doth naturally
Itend downwards, and every li^t body upwards, what a
huddling and confusion must there be, if there were two
places for gravity, and two places for lightness? For it is
probable that the earth of that other world would fall down
to this centre, and so mutually the air and fire here ascend
to those regions in the other ; which must needs much
derogate from the provi4ence of nature, and cause a great
disorder in his works. But ratio^ hac €st minimi firma^
* De Caelo, 1. 1 . cap. 8, 9. f I^id.
\
14 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
(saith Zanchy*.) And if you well consider the nature of
gravity, you will plainly see there is no ground to fear any
such confusion ; for heaviness is nothing else but such a
quality as causes a propension in its subject to tend down-
wards towards its own centre : so that for some of that earth
to come hither, would not be said a fall, but an ascension,
since it is moved from its own place ; and this would be
impossible (saith Ruvio f) because against nature, and there-
fore no more to be feared than the falling of the heavens.
If you reply, that then according to this, there must be
more centres of gravity than one ; I answer, it is very pro-
bable there are ; nor can we well conceive what any piece
of the moon would do, being severed from the rest in the
free and open air, but only return unto it again.
Another argument he had from his master Plato J, That
there is but one world, because there i$ but one first movery
God.
Infirma eiiam est hac ratio (saith Zanchy) ; and we
may justly deny the consequence, since a plurality of
worlds doth not take away the unity of the first Mover, Ut
enim forma suhstantialis^ sic primurn efficiens apparentem
solummodo ynultiplickatem induit per signatam materiam
(saith a countryman of ours §.) As the substantial form, s^
the efficient cause hath only an appearing multiplicity froni
its particular matter. You may see this point more largely
handled, and these arguments more fully answered by Plu-
tarch in his book, " Why Oracles are silenV' and Jacob
Carpentarius in his comment on Alcinous.
But our opposites, the interpreters thenxselve^y (who too
often dojurare in verba magistri) will grant that there is
not any strength in these consequences ; and certainly then
such weak arguments could not convince that wise philosQ-
pher, who in his other opinions was wont to be swayed by
the strength and power of reaso^i;; wherefore I should
rather think that he had some by-respect, which made him
^ De operibus Dei, par. 2. lib. 2. cap. 2. f De Cselo, 1. 1. c. 9, q. 1»
% Metaphys. 1. 12. c. 8. Diog. Laert. lib. 3.
§ Nic. Hill, de Philosoph. Epic, panic. 379.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 15
I
first assent to this opinion, and afterwards strive to prove it.
Perhaps it was because he feared to displease his scholar
Alexander* ; of whoni it is related, that he wept to hear a
disputation of another world, since he had not then attained
the monarchy of this ; his restless wide heart would have
esteemed this globe of earth not big enough for him, if
there had been another ; which made the satyrist say of
bim,
jEsfi4at infcelix angusto limite fnundif.
f* That he did vex himself, and sweat in his desires, as
*' being penned up in a narrow room, when he was con-
f' fined but to one world." Before, he thought to seat
himself next tlie gods, but now, when he had done his
best, he must be content with some equal, or perhaps
superior kings.
It may be, that Aristotle was moved to this opinion, that
he might thereby take from Alexander the occasion of this
fear and discontent ; or else, perhaps, Aristotle himself was
as loth to hold the possibility of a world which he could not
discover, as Alexander was to hear of one which he could
not conquer. It is likely that some such by-respect moved
him to this opinion, since the arguments he urges for it are
confessed by his zealous followers and commentators, to
be very slight and frivolous ; and they themselves grant,
what I am now to prove, that there is not any evidence in
the light of natural reason, which can sufficiently manifest
that there is but one world.
But however some may object, would it not be incon-
venient and dangerous to admit of such opinions that do
destroy those principles of Aristotle which all the world
hath so long fbUowed ?
This question is much controverted by some of the
Romish divines J : Campanella hath writ a treatise in de-
fence of it, in whom you may see many things worth the
Reading and notice.
To it I answer, That this position in philosophy doth
* Plutarch, de tranq. anim. f JuvenaL J Apologia pro Galileo.
' •
16 THAT THE MOON MAY it A WORLD.*
not bring any inconveniency to the rest, since it ha&t
Aristotle, but truth, that should be the rule of our opinioBi;
and if they be not both found together, we may My to liuii»
as he said to his master Plato*,
*^ Though Plato were his friend, yet he would rather
** adhere to truth than him."
I must needs grant, that we are all much beholden to the
industry of the ancient philosophers, and more especially
to Aristotle, for die greater part of our learning ; but yet it
is not ingratitude to speak against him* when he opposeth
truth ; for then many of the fathers would be very guilty,
especially Justin, who hath writ a treatise purposely against
him. But suppose this opinion were fake, yet it is not
against the faith, and so it may serve for the better con-
firmation of that which is true ; the sparks of error being
forced out by opposition, as the sparks of fire by the strik-
ing of the flint and steel. But suppose too that it were
heretical, and against the faith, yet may it be admitted with
the same privilege as Aristotle, &om whom many more
dangerous opinions have proceeded : as that the world is
eternal ; that God cannot have while to look after these
inferior things ; that after death there is no reward or
punishment, and such like blasphemies ; which strike di-
rectly at the fundamentals of our religion.
So that it is justly to be wondered, why some should bq
so superstitious in these days, as to stick closer unto him,
than unto scripture, as if his philosophy were the only
foundation of all divine truths.
Upon these groimds, both St. Vincentius and Seraiinut
de Firmo (as I have seen them quoted] think that Aristotle
was the viol of God's wrath, which was poured out upoQ
the waters of wisdom by the third angel f : but for my part,
I think the world is much beholden to him for all his
sciences. But yet it were a shame for these later ages» to
rest ourselves merely upon the labours of our forefathers, a%
if they had informed us of all things to be known ; an4
* Ethic. I. 1 . c. 6. t Rc^« xvi. 4,
s
r
J;
THAT tHE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 17
when we are set upon their shoulders, not to see further
than they themselves did. It were a superstitious, a lazy
opinion, to think Aristotle's woHcs the bounds and limits of
all human invention, beyond which there could be no pos-
6ibDity of reaching. Certainly there are yet many things
left to discovery, and.it cannot be any inconveniency for
lis to maintain a new truth, or rectify an ancient errorJ
But the position (say some) is directly against scripture ;
for,
1 . Moses tells us but 6f one worlds and his history of the
Creation had been very imperfect, if God had made
ahothqr. . ^
2. St. John, speaking of God's works, says, he made the
world, in the singular number, and therefore there is but
one. It is the argument of Aquinas^, and he thinks that
none will oppose it, but sdch who with Democritus esteem
i^bme blind. chance, and not any wise Providence, to be the
framer.of all things.
3. Th6. opinion of more worlds ha^ in ancient times been
accounted a heresy ; and Baronius affirms that for this very
feason Virgilius was cast out of his bishoprick f, and ex-
communicated from the church.
4. A fourth argument there is urged by Aquinas : if there
be more worlds than one, then they must either be of the
^ame, or of a diverse nature ; but they are not of the same
kind ; fqr this Were needless, and would argue an improvi-
dence, since ohe would have no more perfection than the
Other J : not of divers kinds; for then one of them could
not be called the world or universe, since it did not contain
universal perfection. I liave cited this argument, because
it is so much stood upon by Julius CsSar la Galla §, one that
has purposely writ a treatise against this opinion which I
now deJiver ; but the dilemma is so blunt, that it cannot
cut on either iide, and the consequences so weak, that I
dare trust them without an answer : and (by the way) you
* Part 1. Q. 47. Art.3. f Annal Ecd. A. D. 748. t Ibid,
§ De Pheno*ii« in Qrb« Luna?.
VOL. I. "" C
18 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOULD.
may see this later author in that place, where he endea*
vours to prove a necessity of one world, doth leave the chief
matter in hand, and take much needless pains to dispute
against Democritus, who thought that the world was made
by the casual concourse of atoms in a great vacuum. It
should seem that eitlier his cause or his skill was weak, or
else he would have ventured upon a stronger adversary.
These arguments which I have set down are the chiefest
which I have met with against this subject ; and yet the
best of these hath not force enough to endanger the truth
that I have delivered.
Unto the two first it may be answered, that the negative
authority of scripture is not prevalent in those things which
are not the fundamentals of religion.
But you will reply, though it do not necessarily condudtf
yet it is probable if there had been another world, we
should have had some notice of it in scripture.
I answer, it is as probable that the scripture should haver
informed us of the planets, they being very remarkable parts
of the creation ; and yet neither Moses, nor Job, nor the
Psalms (the places most frequent in astronomical observa-
tions) nor any other scripture mention any of tlicm but the
sun and moon. Because the difference betwixt them and
the other stai-s, was known only to those who were learned
men, and had skill in astronomy. As for that expression
in Job ♦, np3 ODD, the stars of the morning, it is in the
plural number, and therefore cannot properly be applied to
Venus. And for that in Isaiah, y?»n, it is confessed to be a
word of obscure interpretation, and therefore is but by
guess translated in that sense. It being a true and commoM
rule, that Hebrai rei sideralis vimime curiosi ccelestium
nominmn penurid laborant. The Jews being but little skil-
led in astronomy, tlieir language does want proper exprc^
sions for tlie heavenly bodies ; and therefore they are fain
* Job xxxviii. 7. Isa. xiv. 12. Fromond. Vc»ta, t. 3. cap. 2. So 2 Reg.
xxiii. 5. rxbiO^ vvluch is interpreted both for the pUnjets aad for the
twehre sgni.
.IHAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 19
SOirietimes to attribute the same name unto divers constel-
lations.
Now if the Holy Ghost had intended to teveal unto ui
toy natural secrets, certainly he would never have omittea
the mention of the planets; Quorum motu nihil est quod
de conditorts ^apitntia testatur evidentius apud eos qui ca-
piunt*. Which do so evidently set forth tlie wisdom of the
Creator. Add therefore you must know that it is besides
the scope of the Old Testament or the Nevv, to discover
anything unto us concei*ning the secrets of philosophy. It
is not his intent in the New Testament, since we cannot
conceive how it might anyway belong either to the his-
torical, exegetical, or prophetical part§ of it: nor is it his
intent in the Old Testament; as is vtrell observed by our
countryman Master Wright f. Non Mosis aut prophetaruni v
institutum fuisie videtifr mathematicas aliquas aut phisicas
hibiiltates promulgarey sed ad viJdgi captum K loquendi
^wrem^ qu^madmodurh nutriccs iiifantulis solent^ sese ac^
conimodare, " It is not the endeavour of Moses or the
** prophets to discover any mathematical or philosophical
*' subtilties; but rather to accommodate themselves to
" vulgar ca{)acitics, and ordinary Speech, as nurses are wont
** to use their infants." True indeed, Moses is there to
handle the history of the creation. But it is certain (saitli
fcalvid X) that his J)urpose is to treat only of the visible form
of the world, and those part^ of it which might be most
easily understood by the ignorant and ruder sort of people,
and therefore we are not thence to expect thfe discovery of
any natural secret. Artes retanditas aliunde discat qui
ix>let; hie spiritus dei omnes simul sine exceptione docere
voluit. As for more hidden arts, they must be looked for
elsewhere ; the Holy Ghost did here intend to instruct all
without exception. And therefore it is observed, that
Moses does not anywhere meddle with such matters as
were veiy hard to be conceived ; for being to inform the
* Keplar. introduct. in Mart. f In Epist. ad Gilbert.
X Calvin in 1 Gen«
c 2
20 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOlLL]>.
common people as well as others, he does it after a vulgar
way, as it is commonly noted, declaring the original chiefly
of those things which are obvious to the sense; and being
silent of other things which then could not well be appre-
hended. And therefore Pererius * proposing the question,
why the creation of plants and herbs is mentioned, but not
of metals and minerals ?
Answers : 2ida istarum rerum generatio est vulgo oc-
culta £C ignota : Because these things are not so commonlj
known as the other ; and he adds, Moses non ormnoy ^^d
^nanifesta omnibt^s enarranda suscepit. Moses did not in-
tend to relate unto us the beginnings of all things, but those
only which were most evident unto all men. And there-
fore too, Aquinas observes t, that he writes nothing of the
air; because that being invisible, the people kncfw not
whether there were any such body or no. And for this
very reason St. Jerom % also thinks that there is nothli^
exprest concerning the creation of angels ; because the rude
and ignorant vulgar were not so capable of apprehending
their natures. And yet notwithstanding, these are as re-
markable parts of the creation, and as fit to be known as
another world. And therefore the Holy Ghost too, uses
such vulgar expressions, which set things forth rather as
they appear than as they are, as when he calls the moon
one of the greater lights §, whereas it is the least that we can
see in the whole heavens. So afterwards speaking of the
great rain which drowned the world, he says, the win-
dows of heaven were opened ||, because it seemed to come
witli that violence, as if it were poured out from windows
in the firmament 1[.
And in reference to this, a drowth is described in sundry
other places ** by the heavens being shut up. So that tho
phrases which the Holy Ghost uses concerning these things
are not to be understood in a literal sense ; but rather as
♦Com.inlGen.il. f Part 1. Q. 68, Art. 3.
X Epist. 139. ad Cypri. So Pererius in 2 Gen. § Gen. i. 16.
II Gen. xi. MaK iii. .10. IT Sir Walter Rawl. cap. 7. $ect. 6.
** Deut.xi. 17. j Reg. iii. 55. Luke iv. 25.
THAT THE MoON MAY BE A WORLD. 21
vulgar exp/essions ; and this rule is set down by St. Austin*,
where speaking concerning that in the psalm, who stretched
the earth upon the waters, he notes, that when the words
of scripture shall seem to contradict common sense or ex-
perience;, there arc they to be understood in a qualified
sense, and not according to the letter. And it is observed,
that for want of this rulet> some of the ancients have fast-
ened strange absurdities upon the words of the scripture.
So St. Ambrose esteemed it a heresy to think that the sun
and stars were not very hot, as being against the words of
scripture. Psalm xix.6. where the Psalmist says, that there
is nothing that is hid from the heat of the sun. So others
s there are that would prove the heavens not to be round, out
of that place, Psalm civ. 2. He stretched out the heavens
like a curtain. So Procopius also was of opinion, that the
earth was founded upon the waters ; nay, he made it part
of his faith, proving it out of Psalm xxiv. 2. He hathfound-
ed the earth upon the seas^ and established it upon the floods.
These and such like absurdities have followed, when men
look for thegrounds of philosophy in the words of scripture.
So that, from what hath been said, I may conclude that the
silence of scripture concerning any other world, is not suf-
ficient argument to prove that there is none. Thus for the
two first arguments.
Unto the third, I may answer, that this very example is
quoted by others, to shew the ignorance of those primitive
times, who did sometimes condemn what they did not un-
derstand ; and have often censured the lawful and undoubt-
ed parts of mathematics for heretical, because they them-
selves could not perceive a reason of it. And therefore
their practice in this particular is no sufficient testimony
against us.
But lastly, I answer to all the above-named objections,
that the term (world) may be taken in a double sense,
more generally for the whole universe, as it implies in it
* L. 2. in Gen. Ps. cxxxvi. 6.
t Hexamer lib. 2. Item Basil. Ilom. 3. in Gen. Wisd. il. 4. xvii. 5.
^clus. xliii. 3f 4. Com. in c. I Gen.
2'Z THAT THE MOOK MAY BE A WOB.lii:|.
the elementary and acthereal bodies, the stars and the earth.
Secondly, more particularly for an inferior world, consisting^
of elements.
Now the main drift of all these arguments, is to confute
a plurality of worlds in the first sense ; and if there were
any such, it might (perhaps) seem strange, that Moses or
St. John should either not know, or not mention its crea*
tion. And Yirgilius was condemned for this opinion, be-
cause he held guod sit alius murutus sub terras aliusque sol
K lunaj (as Baronius) that within our globe of earth, there
was another world, another sun and moon, ai])d' so he
might seem to exclude this froip the number of the other
creatures.
But now there is no such danger in this opinion, whicl^
is here delivered ; since this world is said to be in the
raeon, whose creation is particularly expressed.
So that in the first sense, I yield that there is but one
Vrorld, which is all that the arguments do prove ; but un-
derstand it in the second sense, and so I affirm there may
be more, nor do any of the above-named objections prove
tlie contrary.
Neither can this opinion derogate fro(n tlie divine wis-
dom (as Aquinas thinks) but rather advance it, shewing a
compendium of Providence, that could make the same
body a worlds and a moon ; a world for habitation,' and
a moon for the use of others, and the ornament of the
whole frame of nature. For as the members of tlie body
serve not only for the preservation of themselves, but for
the use and conveniency of the whole, as the hand pro-
tects the head as well as saves itself* ; so is it in the.
parts of the universe, where each one may serve as well
ifor the conservation of that which is within it, as the help
of others without it.
Mersennus a late Jesuit f, proposing the question whether
or no the opinion of more worlds than one, be heretical and
* Cusanus de Doct. Ignor. 1. 2. c. 12.
f Comment, in Gen. Qu, 19. Art. 2.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 23
against the feith ? He answers it negatively ; because it does
not contradict any express place of scripture, or determina-
tion of the church. And though (saith he) it seems to be
a rash opinion, as being against the consent of the fathers;
yet if this controversy be chiefly philosophical, then their
authorities are not of such weight. Unto this it may be
added, that the consent of the fathers is prevalent only in
such points as were first controverted amongst them, and
then generally decided one way, and not in such other
particulars as never fell under their examination and
dispute.
I have now in some measure shewed that a plurality of
worlds does not contradict any principle of reason or place
of scripture ; and so cleared the first part of that supposi-
tion which is implied in the opinion.
It may next be enquired, whether it is possible there
may be a globe of elements in that which we call the
asthereal parts of the universe ; for if this (as it is accord-
ing to the common opinion) be privileged from any
change err corruption, it will be in vain then to imagine
any element there ; and if we will have another world, we
must then seek out some other place for its situation. The
third proposition therelbre shall be this.
PROP. III.
That the heavens do not consist of any such pure matter^
which can privilege them from the like change and cor-
ruption as these inferior bodies are liable unto.
IT hath been often questioned amongst the ancient fa-
thers and philosophers, what kind of matter that
should be of which the heavens are framed. Some
think that they consist of a fifth substance distinct from
the four elements, as Aristotle holds*, and with him
• De Caelo, lib. 1. cap. 2.
24 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLQ.
some of the late schoolmen ; whose subtil brains oouldi
not be content to attribute to those vast glorious bodies*
but common materials, and therefore they themselves had
rather take pains to prefer them to some extraordinary
nature ; whereas notwithstanding, all the arguments they
could invent, were not able to convince a necessity of
any such matter, as is confessed by their own side*. It
were much to be desired, that these men had not in other
cases, as well as this, multiplied things without necessity ^
and, as if there had not been enough to be known in the
secrets of nature, have spun out new subjects from their
own brains, to find more work for future ages. I shall
not mention their arguments, since it is already confessed,
that they are none of them of any necessary consequence ;
and besides, you may see them set dowi; in any of the
books de Calo.
Sut it is the general consent of the fathers, aiid the opi-
nion of Lombard, that the heavens consist of the sam^
matter with these sublunary bodies. St. Ambrose is so
confident of it, that he esteems the contrary a heresy f.
True indeed, they differ much among themselves, some
thinking them to be made of fire, others of water, and
others of both : but herein they generally agree, that they
are all framed of some element or other ; which Diony-
sius Carthusianus I collects from that place in Genesis,
"where the heavens are mentioned in their creation, as di-
vided only in distance from the elementary bodies, and
not as being made of aoy new matter. To this purpose
others cite the derivation of the Hebrew word a»QU^,
quasi ryD ibi K Q'O aquce or quasi u;w ignis ^ 0*0 aqu^j
because they are framed out of these elements. But con-
cerning this, you may see sundry discourses more at large
in Ludovicus Molina, Eusebius Nirembergius, witli di-
Vers others. The venerable Bede thought the planets to
consist of all the four elements § ; and it is likely that the
* CoUeg. Connimb. de caelo. 1. 1 . c. 2. q. 6. art. 3. f ^^ Hex am . lib. 4,
1 Enarrat, in Genes, art. 10. § In operc. 6 dierum disput. 5.
•v
;>-
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLp. ^
lather parts of it are of an aereous substance/ as will be
>hewed afterwards* : however, I cannot now stand to re-
cite the arguments for either ; 1 have only urged these
authorities to countervail Aristotle and the schoolmen^
^d the better to make way for a proof of their corrup*
tibillty.
The ne^t thing then to be enquired after, is. Whether
jthey be of a corruptible nature f ; not whether they can
bjB destroyed by God ; for this scripture puts out of
doubt
Nor whether or no in a long time tliey would wear
away and grow worse, for from any such fear they have
been lately privileged!. But whether they are capable of
such changes and vicissitudes, as this inferior world is liable
unto.
The two chief opinions concerning tliis, have both erred
jn some extremity, the one side going so far from the
other; that they have both gone beyond the right ; whilst
4^ristotle hath opposed the truth as well as the Stoics.
Some of the ancients have thought, that the heavenly
bodies haye stood in need of nourishment from the ele-
ments, by which they were continually fed, and so had
divers alterations by reason of their food. This is fathered
on Heraclitus, followed by that great naturalist Pliny, and
in general attributed to all the Stoicks§. You may see
ISeneca expressly to this purpose in these words. £x
■^ . ilia alimenta oynnibus animalibus. omnibus satisy omnibus
■ . $tellis dividuntur ; hinc profertur quo sustineantur tot si-
derOf tarn exercitatay tarn avida, per diem^ noctemque^ ut
in opera^ ita in pastu. Speaking of the earth, he says,
from thence it is that nourishment is divided to all the
living creatures, the planets and the ?tars; hence were
sustained so many constellations, so laborious, so greedy,
* In lib. de Mundi constit. t 2 Pet. iii. 12.
X By Debtor Hakewill. Apol. lib. 2. § Plutarch de plac.
Philos. 1. 2^ c, 17 . Nat. Hist. 1. 2. c. 9. Nat. quest, lib. 2. cap. 5.
»« >.
'26 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
both day and night, as well in their feeding as working.
Thus also Lucan sings,
Necnon aceano pasci Phcebumque polunique crcdimus.
Unto these, Ptoloray also*, that learned Egyptian,
seemed to agree, when he affirms that the body of the
moon is moister and cooler than any of the other planets,
by reason of the earthly vapours that are exhaled unto
it. You see these ancients thought the heavens to be so
far from this imagined incorruptibility, that ratlier like the
weakest bodies they stood in need of some continual nou*
rishment, Without which they could not subsist.
But Aristotle and his followers were so far from this f ,
tiiat they thought those glorious bodies could not contain
in them any such principles as might make tlieni liable to
the least change or corruption ; and their chief reason was,
because we could not in so long a space discern any altera-
tion amongst them. But unto this I answer :
1 . Supposing we could not, yet would it not hence foHow
that there were none, as he himself in effect doth confess
in another place ; for speaking concerning our knowledge
ef the heavens, he says J, it is very imperfect and difficult,
by reason of the vast distance of those bodies from us, and
because the changes which may happen unto them, are
not either big enough, or frequent enough to fall within
the apprehension and observation of our senses ; no won-
der then, if he himself be deceived in his assertions con*
cerning these particulars. But yet, in this he implies, that
if a man were nearer to these heavenly bodies, he would
be a fitter judge to decide this controversy than himself.
Now it is our advantage, that by the help of Galileus's
glass, we are advanced nearer unto them, and the heavens
are made more present to us than they were before.
Jlowever, as it is with us, where there be many vicissitudes
and successions of things, though the earth abideth for
* 1 Apostol. t De Caelo, 1. 1. c. 3.
i^ De cselo, 1. !3« cap. 5.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 21
pvcr; SO likewise may it be amongst the planets; in
which, though there should be clivers alterations, yet they
themselves may still continue of the same quantity and
light.
2. Though we could not by our senses see such altera-
tions, yet our reason might perhaps sufficiently convince
ps of them. Nor can we well conceive how the sun should
reflect against the moon, and yet not produce some alte-
ration of heat. Diogenes the philosopher was hence per-
suaded, that those scorching heats had burnt tlie moon
into the form of a pun^ice-stone.
3. I answer, /That there have been some alterations ob-
served there ; witness those comets which have been seen
above the moon ; as also those spots or clouds that encom-
pass the body of the sun ; amongst which, there is a fre-
ijuent succession by a corruption of the old, and a genera-
tion of new. So that though Aristotle's consequence were
sufficient, when he proved that the heavens were not cor-
ruptible, because there, have not any changes been disco-
vered in it ; yet this by the same reason must be as preva-
lent, that the heavens are corruptible, because there have
hccn so many alterations observed there. But of these,
together with a farther confirmation of this proposition, I
^hall have occasion to speak afterwards : in the mean
^pace, I will refer the reader to that work of Scheinen,
a late Jesuit, which he titles his Sosa Urnna *, where he
may see this point concerning the corruptibility of the hea-
vens largely handled, and sufficiently confirmed.
There are some other things, on which I might here
|ake an occasion to enlarge myself; but because they are
directly handled by many others, and do not immediately
belong to the chief matter in hand, I shall therefore refer
the reader to their authors, and omit any large proof of
them myself, as desiring all possible brevity.
1. The first is this: That there are no solid orbs. If
there be a habitable world in the moon, (which I now afr
* lib* 4. par« 2. cap. j24. 35.
^»
38 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
firm) it must follow, that her orb is not solid, as Aristotlff
supposed ; and if not hers, why any of the other ? I ra-
ther think that they are all of a fluid (perhaps acreous)
substance. St. Ambrose and St. Basil did endeavour to
prove this out of that place in Isaiah*, where they are
compared to smoke, as they are both quoted by Rhodigi-
nus. Eusebius Nierembergus doth likewise from that
placet* confute the solidity and incorruptibility of the
heavens, and cites for the same interpretation the autho-
rity of Eustachius, of Antioch ; and St. Austin J, I am sure,
in one place seems to assent unto this opinion, though he
does often in his other works contradict it.
If you esteem the testimony of the ancient fathers, to be
of any great force or consequence in a philosophical dis-
pute, you may see them to this purpose in Sixtus Senensis,
lib. 5. Biblioth. annot. 14. The chief reasons that are
commonly urged for the confirmation of it, are briefly
these three,
1. From the altitude of divers comets, which have been
observed to be above the planets ; through whose orbs (if
they had been solid) there would not have been any pas-
sage. To these may be added those lesser planets lately
discovered about Jupiter and Saturn, for which astrono-
mers had not yet framed any orbs.
2. From that uncertainty of all astronomical observa-
tions, which will follow upon the supposition of such solid
spheres. For then we should never discern any star, but
by a multitude of refractions, and so consequently we
could not possibly find their true situations, either in re-
spect of us, or in regard of one another : since whatever
the eye discerns by a refracted beam, it apprehends to be
in some other place than wherein it is. But now this
would be 5uch an inconvenience, as would quite subvert
the grounds and whole art of astronomy, and therefore is
by no means to be admitted.
* Isa; li. 1. 6. Ant, lect. 1. 1, c. 4.
f Hist. nat. L 2. c. 1 1 . 13t^ J In lib. sup. Gen. ad. lit.
.-^■■""
■>
THAT TrtE MOON MAY Bt A WORLDv 29
Unto this it is commonly answered, That all those orbs
are equally diaphanous, though not of a continued quan-
tity. We reply, Tliat supposing they were, yet this can-
not hinder them from being the causes of refraction,
which is produced as well by tlie diversity of superficies^
as the different perspicuity of bodies. Two glasses put
together, will cause a diverse refraction from another single
one, that is but of equal thickness and perspicuity.
3. From the different height of the same planet at se-
veral times. For, if according to the usual hypothesis,
there should be such distinct, solid orbs, then it would be
impossible that the planets should intrench upon one an-
other's orbs, or that two of them at several times should
be above one another, which notwithstanding hath been
proved to be so by later experience. Tycho hath ob-
served, that Venus is sometimes nearer to us than the
Sun or Mercury, and sometimes farther off than both :
which appearances Regiomontanus himself does acknow-
ledge, and withal, does confess that they cannot be recon-
ciled to the common hypothesis.
But for your better satisfaction herein, I shall refer you
to the above-named Scheiner, in his Rosa I/rsi?ia^j in
whom you may see both authorities and reason very largely
and distinctly set down for this opinion. For the better
confirmation of which, he adjoiit^ also some authentical
epistles of Fredericus Caesius Lynceus, a noble princCg
written to Bellarmine, containing divers reasons to th©
same purpose. You may also see the same truth set down
by Johannes Pena, in his preface to Euclid's Opticks, and
Christoph. Rothmannus, both who thought the firma-
ment to be only air ; and though the nyble Tycho do dis-
pute against themt> yet he himself holds, Suod propius ad
veritatis penetralia acctdit hac opinio^ qtutvi Jristotelica
vulgariter approbata, qua caelum pluribus realibus atqite
impervils orbibtis citra 7 em rephvit. " That this opinion
" conies nearer to tlie truth, than that common one of
* lib. 4. p. 11.2. c. 7. ^e. 30. fDestell. 1. 15, 72. 1. I.e. 9.
30 THAT THE koOl^ MAY B£ A WORLD;
'** Aristotle, which hath to no purpose filled the heavehi
^* with such xeal and impervious orbs.
2. There is no element of fire, which must be held witH
this opinion here delivered ; for if we suppose a world iil
^ the moon, then it will follow, that tlie sphere of fire either
is not there, where it is usually placed in the concavity of
his orb, or else that there is tio such thing at all ; which ii
most probable, since there are not ally such solid orbs^
that by their swift modon might heat and enkindle the ad-
joining air, which is imagined to be the reason of that ele-
ment. The arguments that are commonly Urged to thtft
purpose, are these.
I . That which was before alleged concerning the re-
fractions which will be caused by a different medium.
For if the matter of the heavens be of one thickness, and
the element of fire another, and the upper regioii of air
distinct ftom both these, and the lower region several
from all the rest ; there wilF then be such a multiplicity of
tefractiotis, as must ilecessarily destroy the certainty of
all astronohiical observations. All wliich inconvenienced
might be avoided, by supposing (as we do) that there i^
6nly one orb of vaporous air which encompasses our earthy
all the rest being aetbereal, and of the same perspicuity*
i. The situation of this element does no way agree witli
Aristotle's own principles^ or that common Providence of
nature, which v:e may discern in ordinary matters. For
if the heavens be without all elementary qualities, as i^
usually supposed, theii it would be a very incongruous
thing for the element of fire to be placed immediately
next unto it ; since the heat of this is the most povfrerfui
and vigorous Equality that is among all the rest : and na-
ture in her lYorks, does not join extremes, but by some-
tliing of a middle dispositiori. , So in the very frame of
our bodies, the bones which are of a hard substance, and
the flesh of a 6oft, are not joined together but by the in-
tercession of membranes and gristles, such as being of at
middle nature may fitly come betwixt.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. SI
3. It is not conceiveable for what use or benefit there
should be any such element in that place ; and certain it is,
that nature does not do any thing in vain.
4. Betwixt two extremes there can be but one medium ; . .-*
and therefore between those two opposite elements of
' earth and water, it hiay seem more convenient to place
only the air, which shall partake of middle qualities diffe-
rent from both.
5. Fire does not seem so properly and directly to be op-
pcued to any thing as ice ; and if the one be not an ele-
ment, why should the other ?
If you object, that the fii*e which we commonly use
does always tend upwards ; I answer, This cannot proved
that there is a natural place for such an element, since our
adversaries themselves do grant, that culinary and elemen-^
tary fire are of different kinds. The one does burn, shine,
and corrupt its subject ; the other disagrees from it in all
these respects. And therefore from the ascent of the one,
we cannot properly infer the being or the situation of the
other.
But for your farther satisfaction herein, you may peruse
Cardan, Johannes Pena, that learned Frenchman the noble
Tycho, with divers others who have purposely handled
this proposition.
3. I might add a third, viz. That there is no music of
the spheres ; for if they be not solid, how can their mo-
tion cause any such sound as is conceived ^ I do the rather
nleddle with this, because Phitarch speaks as if a man
xfiighi very conveniently hear that harmony, if he were an
inhabitant in the moon. But I guess that he said this
out of incogitancy, and did not well consider those ne-
cessary consequences which depend upon his opinion.
However, the world would have no gteat loss in being
deprived of this music, unless at some times we had the
privilege to hear it*: then indeed Philo the Jew thinks
it would save us the charges of diet, and we might live at
* De somniis.
33 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.'
an easy rate by feeding at the ear only, and receiving no
* other nourishment ; and for this very reason, says he, was
^ Moses enabled to tarry forty days and forty nights in the
mount without eating any thing, because he there heard
* the meJody of the heavens. — Risiim ieneatis. I know
this music hath had great patrons, both sacred and pro-
fane authors, such as Ambrose, Bede, Boetius, Anselm,
Plato, Cicero, and others ; but because it is not now, I
think, affirmed by any, I shall npt therefore bestow eitliec
{>ains or time in arguing against it.
It may suffice that t have only named these three last,
and for the two more necessary, have referred the reader
to others for satisfaction. I shall. in the next place pro-
ceed to the nature of the moon^a body, to know whether
^ that be capable of any siich conditions, as may make it
• » possible to be inhabited, and what those qualities are
wherein it more nearly agrees with our earth.
>
* PROP. IV.
Thai the Moon is a soUdy compacted^ opacotis body.
« **
I Shall not need to stand long in the proof of this propo-
sition, since it is a truth already agreed on by the ge-
neral consent of the most and the best philosophers.
It is soKd, in opposition to fluid, as is the air; for how.
otherwise could it beat back the light which it receives
from the sun ?
But here it may be questioned, whether or no the moott
bestow her light upon us by the reflection of the sun-beams
from the superficies of her body, or else. by her own illu-
mination ? Some there are who affirm this latter part. So
Averroes*, Caelius Rhodiginusf, Julius Caesar J, &c. And
their reason is, because this light is ^scorned in many
* De coelo 1. 5. com. 49. f Ant. lection. I. 20. c. 4.
t De phaenom. luna?. c. 11.
TfltAT THE MOON MAY B£^ A WORLtt. 38
places, whereas those bodies which give light by teflexion,
can there only be perceived where the angle of reflexion
is equal to the angle of incidence, arid this is only in one
iplacc ; as in a looking-gkss, those beams which are re-
flected frotti it, cannot be perceived in evety place where
you may see the glass,- but only thete where your eye ii
l^laced on the same line whereoti the beanis are reflected.
But to this I answer, That the argument will not hold 6f
such bodies whose superficies is full of unequal parts and
gibbosities, as the moon is. Wherefore it is as well the
more probable as the more common opinion, that her
light proceeds from both these causes, from reflexion and
illumination ; nor doth it herein differ from our earth,
since that also hath some light by illumination: For how
otherwise would the parts about us in .a sun-shine day ap-
pear so bright, when as the rays of reflexion cannot enter
into our eye ?
For the better illustration of this, we may consider the
several ways whereby divers bodies are enlightened. Either
as water by admitting the beams into its substance ; or as
air and thin clouds, by transmitting the rays q^iite through
their bodies ; or as those things that are of an bpacous na-
ture, and smooth superficies, which teflcct the light only
in one place ; or else as those things which are of an opa-
cDus naturcj and rugged superficies, which by a kind of ,
circumfluous reflexion, are at the same time discernible in
many places, as our earth and the moon.
2. It is compact, and not a spungy and porous sub-
stance. iBut this is denied by Diogenes*, Vitelliof, and
Reinoldus J, and some others, who held the moon to be
of the same kind of nature as a pumice-stone ; and this, say
they, is the reason why in the sun's eclipses, there appears
within her a duskish ruddy, colour, because the sun-beams
being refracted in passing through the pores of her body,
must necessarily be represented under such a colour,
* Plut. de pla. Phil. 1. 2. c. 13. t Opu 1. 4.
X Com. Furbac. Theo. p. 164.
VOL. I. D
34
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
But I reply, if this be the cause of her redness, then
why doth she not appear under the same form when she
is about a sextile aspect, and the darkened part of her body
is discernible ? for then also do the same rays pass through
her, and therefore in all likelihood should produce the
same effect ; and notwithstanding those beams are then
diverted from us, that tliey cannot enter into our eyes by
a straight line, yet must the colour still cemain visible in
her body. And besides, according to this opinion, the
spots would not always be the same, but diverse as the va-
rious distance of the sun requires. Again, if the sun-beams
did pass through her, why then hath she not a tail (saith
Scaliger*) as the comets ? Why doth she appear in such an
exact round ? and not rather attended witli a long flame,
since it is merely this penetration of the sun-beams that is
usually attributed to be the cause of beards in blazing stars.
3. It is opacous, not transparent or diaphanous like crys^
tal or glass, as Empedocles thought f, who held the moon
to be a globe of pure congealed air, like hail inclosed in a
sphere of fire ; for then,
1 . Why does she not always appear in the full ? sinca
the light is dispersed through all her body ?
2. How can the interposition of her body so darken the
sun Xi or cause such great eclipses as have turned day into
night ; that have discovered the stars, and frightened the
birds with such a sudden darkness, that they fell down
upon the «arth ? as it is related in divers histories. And
therefore Herodotus telling of an eclipse which fell in
Xerxes's time, describes it thus : o ijA<©^ f hA/tijv rtjv ex t*
BqavseS^viV ci^scvi^g vjv^. The sun leaving his wonted seat in
the heavens, vanished away ; all which argues such a great
darkness as could not^ have been, if her body had been
perspicuous. Yet some there are who interpret all these
relations to be hyperbolical expressions; and the noble
Tycho thinks it naturally impossible that any eclipse should
♦ Scaliger Excrcit. 80. sect. 13.
{ Thucid. Livii. Plut. de facie lunae.
f Plut. de facie lunx.
§ Herodot. I 7. c. 37*
TttAT tllE MOON MAY BE A WORLb, 35'
Cause such darkness, because the body of the moon can
never totally cover the sun. However, in this he is singu-
lar, all other astronomers (if I may believe Keplar) being
on the contrary opinion, by reason the diameter of the
moon does for the most part appear bigger to us than the
diameter of the sun.
But here Julius Csesar once more puts in to hinder out
passage. The moon (saith he*) is not altogether opacous,
because it is still of the same nature vfiih the heavens,
which are incapable of total opacity : and his reason is,
because perspicuity is an inseparable accident of those
purer bodies ; and this he tliinks must necessarily be
granted ; for he stops there, and proves no further ; but
to this I shall defer an answer till he hath made up his
argument.
We may frequently see, that her body does so eclipse
the sun, as our earth doth the moon^ And besides, the
mountains that are observed there, do cast a dark shadow
behind them, as shall be shewed afterwards f. Since then
the like interposition of them both, doth produce the like
effect, they must necessarily be of the like natures, that
is, alike opacous, which is the thing to be shewed ; and
this was the reason (as the interpreters guess) why Aris-
totle X affirmed the moon to be of the earth's nature, be-
cause of their agreement in opacity ; whereas all the other
elements, save that, are in some measure perspicuous.
But the greatest difference which may seem to make our
earth altogether unlike the moon, is, because the one is a
bright body, and hath light of its own, and the other a
gross dark body which cannot shine at all. It is requisite
therefore that in the next place I clear this doubt, and
shew that the moon hath no more light of her own than
our earth.
* De phaenom. lunae, c. 1 1 . f Prop. 9. ij: In lib* 4e animalib*
X> 2
36 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD^
PROP V.
That the Moon hath not any light of her own*
r" was the fancy of some of the Jews, and more espe*-
cially of Rabbi Simeon*, that the moon was nothing
else but a contracted sun ; and that both those planets,
at their first creation, were equal both in light and quan-
tity. For, because God did then call them both great
lights, therefore they inferred that they must be both
equal in bigness. But a while after (as the tradition goes)
the ambitious moon put up her complaint to God against
the sun, shewing that it was not fit there should be
two such great lights in the heavens ; a monarchy would
best become the place of order and harmony. Upon this,
God commanded her to contract herself into a narrower
compass ; but she being much discontented hereat, replies.
What ! because I have spoken that which is reason and
equity, must I therefore be diminished ? This sentence
could not chuse but much trouble her ; and for this reason
was she in great distress and grief for a long space ; but
that her sorrow might be some way pacified, God bid her
be of good cheer, because her privileges and charter should
be greater than tlie sun's ; he should appear in the day
time only, she both in the day and night ; but her melan-*
choly being not satisfied with this, she replied again, That
that alas was no benefit ; for in the day time she should be
cither not seen, or not noted. Wherefore, God to com-
fort her up, promised, that his people the Israelites should
celebrate all their feasts and holidays by a computation of
her months ; but this being not able to content her, she
has looked very melancholy ever since ; however, she hath
itill reserved much light of her own.
Others there were, that did think the moon to be a
round globe ; the one half of whose body was of a bright
substance, the other half being dark ; and the divers con-
* Tostatus in 1 Gen. Hyeron. de jancia fide Hebraomait. 1. 2. c. 4*
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 37
versions of those sides towards our eyes, caused the variety
of her appearances. Of this opinion was Berosus, as he
is cited by Vitruvius*; and St. Austin f thought it was
probable enough. But this fancy is almost equally absurd
with the former, and both of them sound rather like fables,
than philosophical truths. You may commonly see how
this latter does contradict frequent and easy experience ;
for it is observed, that that spot which is perceived about
her middle when she is in the increase, may be discerned
in the same place when she is in the full : whence it must
follow, that the same part which was before darkened, is
after enlightened, and that the one part is not always
dark, and the other light of itself But enough of this ;
I would be loth to make an enemy, that I may after-
wards overcome him, or bestow time in proving that which
is already granted ; I suppose now, that neither of them
hath any patrons, and therefore need no confutation.
It is agreed upon by all sides, that this planet receives
most of her light from the sun ; but the chief controversy
is, whether or no she hath any of her own ? The greater
multitude affirm this. Cardan J amongst the rest, is very
confident of it ; and he thinks that if any of us were in the
moon at the time of her greatest eclipse, lunam aspicere"
mus non secus ac innumems cereis splendidissimis accensisy
atque in eas oculis defixis cacutiremus ; ** we should per-
** ceive so great a brightness of her own, that would blind
** us with the mere sight, and when she is enlightened by
** the sun, then no eagle's eye (if there were any there) is
'* able to look upon her." This Cardan says, and he doth
but say it, without bringing any proof for its confirmation.
However, I will set down the arguments that are usually
urged for this opinion, and tliey are taken either from
scripture or reason ; from scripture is urged that place,
1 Cor. XV. where it is said. There is one glory of the sun,
^nd another glory of the moon. Ulysses Albergettus urges
* lib. 9. Architect. f Narrat. Psalm, item ep. 119.
% De subtil. 1. 3,
58. THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
that in Matth. xxiv. 29. >j (rsXviVv\y s Imei to (peyyO^ uvT\^Ci
the moon shall not give her light : therefore (says he) she
hath some of her own.
But to these we may easily answer, that the glory and
light there spoken of, may be said to be hers, though it be
derived, as you may see in many otlier instances.
The arguments from reason are taken either,
1. From that light which is discerned in her, when tliere
is a total eclipse of her own body, or of the sun.
2. From the light which is discerned in the darker part
of her body, when she is but a little distant from the sun.
1. For when there are any total eclipses, ^here appears
in her body a great redness, and many times light enough
to cause a remarkable shade, as common esiperience doth
sufficiently manifest : but tliis cannot come from the sun,
^ince at such times either the earth or her own body
shades her from the sun-beams ; therefore it must pro-
ceed from her own light.
2. Two or three days after the new moon, we may per-
ceive light in her whole body, whereas the rays of the sun
reflect but upon a small part of that which is visible ; there-
fore it is likely that there is some light of her own.
In answering to these objections, I shall first shew, that
this light cannot be her own ; and then declare that which
is the true reason of it.
That it is not her own, appears,
1 . Because then she would always retain it ; but she has
been sometimes altogether invisible, when as notwith-
standing some of the fixed stars of the fourth or fifth mag-
nitude might easily have been discerned close by her : as
it was in the year 1620*,
2.' This may appear likewise from the variety of it at
fivers times ; for it is commonly observed that sometimes
it is of a brighter, sometimes of a darker appearance ; now
redder, and at another time of a more duskish colour.
The observation of this variety in divers eclipses, you may
* Keplar ep. Astron. cop. L 6. p. 5. sect. 2.
^
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 39
4Jce set down by Keplar and many others*. But now this
could not be, if that light were her own, that being con-
stantly tl^e same, and without any reason of such an alte-,
ration : so that thus I may argue.
If there were any light proper to the moon, then would
that planet appear brightest when she is eclipsed in her
perige, being nearest to the earth ; and so consequently
more obscure and duskish when she is in her apoge or
farthest from it ; the reason is, because the nearer any en- ,
lightened body comes to the sight, by so much tlie more
strong are the species, and the better perceived. This
sequel is granted by some of our adversaries, and they are
the very words of noble Tycho ; Si Itlna genuino gauderet
lumine^ utique cum in umbra terra, esset, illud non amii-
teretysed eo evidentius exerceret; omne enim lumen in tene-
brisj plus splendet cum alio majore/ulgore non prapediturf.
If the moon had any light of her own, then would she not
lose it in the earth's shadow, but rather shine more clearly ;
since every light appears greater in the dark, when it is
not hindered by a more conspicuous brightness.
But now the event falls out clean contrary, (as observa-
tion doth manifest, and our opposites themselves do grant)
tlie moon appearing with a more reddish and clear light
when she is eclipsed, being in her apoge or farthest dis-
tance, and a more blackish iron colour when she is in her
perige or nearest to us, therefore she hath not any light
of her own. Nor may we think that the earth's shadow
can cloud the proper light of the moon from appearing,
or take away any thing from her inherent brightness J ; for
this were to think a shadow to be a body, an opinion alto-
gether misbecoming a philosopher, as Tycho grants in the
fore-cited place;. Nee umbra terra corporeum quid est^ aut
densa aliqua substantia^ ui luna lumen obtenebrare pos-
sity atque id visui nostro praripere^ sed est quadam priva--
tio luminis Solaris^ ob interposituyn opacum corpus terra.
* Opt. astron. c. 7. num. 3. t ^^ Ti07z. Stella. 1. 1. c. 10.
% Reinold Commem. in Furb. Theor. p. 164.
40 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
■Nor is the earth's shadow any corporeal thing, or thick
§ub3tance, that it can cloud the moon's brightness, or take
it away from our sight ; but it is a mere privation of th^
sun's light by reason of the interposition of the earth's
ppacous body.
3. If she had any light of her own, then that would
itself be cither such a ruddy brightness as appears in the
eclipses, or else such a leaden duskish light, as we se?
\n the darker p^rts of her body, when she is a little past
the conjunction. (That it must be one of the$e, may fol-
low from the opposite arguments;) but it is neither of
thes^, therefore she hath none of her own.
1. It is not such a ruddy light as appear? in eclipses;
for then why can we not see the like redness, when we
ii^ay discern the obscurer parts of the moon ?
You will say, perhaps, that tlien the nearness of that
greater light takes away that appearance.
I reply. This cannot be. For then, why does Mars shine
with his wonted redness, when he is near the moon ? Or
why cannot her greater brightness make him appear white.,
as the other planets ? Nor can there be any reason given,
\yhy that greater light should represent her body under 4.
false colour.
2. It is nqt such a du§kish leaden light, as we see in the
darker part of her body, when she is about a sextile aspect
distant from the sun ; for then, why docs she appear red
in the eclipses; since mere shade cannot cause such a va-
riety? For it is the nature of darkness, by its opposition^
^ther to make things appear of a more white and clear
brightness, than tliey are in themselves. Or, if it be the
shade, yet those parts of the mooi\ are then in the shade
ofher body, and therefore in reason should have the like
redness. Since» then, neither, of these lights are hers^;
it follows, that 5he hath none of her own. Nor is this a
singular opinion, but it hath had many learned patrons:
such was Macrobius*, who being for this quoted of Rho-*^
* Somn. Scip. 1. 1. c 20. Lect, antiq. 1. I.e. 15.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOKLD. 41
diginus, he calls him, vir reconditissima scleniia^ a man
who knew more than ordinary philosophers ; thus comtr
mending the opinioA in the credit of the author. To him
assents the venerable Bede *, upon whom the gloss hath
this comparison : As the looking-glass represents not any
image within itself, unless it receive some from with-
out ;'so the moon hath not any light, but what is bestowed
by the sun. To these agu'ecd Albertus Magnus f^ Sca-
ligerj, M2BsHn§, Keplar, and more especially Mulapcr-
tius II ; whose words are more pat to the purpose than
others, and therefore I shall set them down as you may
find them in his preface to his treatise concerning the
Austriaca Sydera : LunUy Venus, el Mercurius, terrestris
et humida sunt substantice ; idcoque de sua noii lucere, sicui
nee tert^a. The Moon, Venus, and Mercury (saith he),
are of an earthly and moist substance ; and therefore have
no more light of their own, than the earth hath. Nay,
some there- are who think (though without ground), that
all the other stars do receive that light whereby they ap-
pear visible to us, from the sun. So Ptolomy, Isidore His-
palensis^, Albertus "Magnus**, and Bedeft* much mote
then, must the moon shine with a borrowed light.
But enough of this. I have now sufEciently shewed what
at the first I promised ; that this light is not proper to the
moon. It remains in the next place, that I tell you the
true reason of it. And here, I think it is probable, that
the light which appears in the moon at the eclipses, is no-
thing else but the second species of the sun's rays, which
pass through the shadow unto her body : and from a mix-
lurc of this second light with the shadow, arises that red-'
ness which at such times appears unto us. I may call it
lumen creptcsculinum, the Aurora of the moon, or such a
kind of blushing light that the sun causes when he is near
^ In lib. de nat. rer. f De 4 Coaevis. Q. 4. Art. 21 . J Exercit. 62,
- 1 Epitom Astron. 1. 4. p. 2, \\ Epit. Astron. Cop. 1. 6. part 2. sect. 2*
ir Origin. 1. 3. c. 60. ** De Caelo, 1. 2.
tt De ratione temp. c. 4. Item Pirn. L 2. c. 6» Hugo de Sancto
Vktore. Anxiot in G^B* vi.
*.
"45 THAT THE JVroON MAY BE A WORLD.
his rising, when he bestows some small light upon the
thicker vapours. Thus we see commonly the sun being
in the horizon, and the reflection growing weak, how his
beams make the waters appear very red.
The Moabites, in Jehoram's time, when they rose early
in the morning, and beheld the waters afar off, mistook
them for blood*. Et causa hujus est^ quia radius Solaris in
aurora contrahit quondam rubedinem^ propter vapor ts corn-
bustos mancntes circa superficiem Urr^y per qujos radii
iranstunt I K ideo cum repercutiantur in aqua ad oculos
nostroSy irahunisecumeundem rubor em ^ K faciunt apparere
locum aquarum^ in quo est repercussioy esse rubrum ; saith
Tostatus. The reason is, because of his rays ; which
being in the lower vapours, those do convey an imperfect
mixed light upon the waters. Thus the moon being in the
earth's shadow, and the sun-beams which are round about
it not being able to come directly unto her body ; yet some
second rays there are, which passing through the shadow,
make her appear in that ruddy colour : so that she must
appear brightest, when she is eclipsed, being in her apoge
or gre/atest distance from us ; because then the cone of the
earth's shadow is less, and the refraction is made through a
narrower medium. So on the contrary, she must be re-
presented under a more dark and obscure form when she
15 eclipsed, being in her perige, or nearest to the earth ;
because then she is involved in a greater shadow, or bigger
part of the cone ; and so the refraction passing through a
greater medium, the light must needs be weaker which
doth proceed from it. If you ask now, What the reason
imay be of that light which we discern in the darker part of
the new moon ? I answer ; it is reflected from our earth ;
which returns as great a brightness to that planet, as it re-
ceives from it. This I shall have occasion to prove after-
ward. ^
I have nov^ done with these propositions, which were
set down to clear the passage, and confirm the suppositions
* U Kii^ lii. 22. 2 Quant, in hoc cap.
- <
T«AT THE MOOij MAY BE A WORLD. 41
implied in the opinion. I shall in the next place proceed
"to a more direct treating of the chief matter in hand.
PROP. VI.
That there is a world in the Moon, hath been the direct opi*
nion of many ancient, with some modern mathemati"
ciaiis ; and may probably be deduced from the tenets of
others.
SINCE this opinion may be suspected of singularity, I
shall therefore first confirm it by sufficient authority of
divers authors, both ancient and modern ; that so I may
the better clear it from the prejudice either of an upstart
fancy, or an obsolete error. This is by some attributed to
Orpheus, one of the most ancient Greek poets*, who
speaking of the moon, says thus ; »f toAA' npeu, £%«, toAX*
ttffT£ct, %oXXct (i€Kct6^X9 that it hath many mountains, and ci-»
ties, and houses in it. To him assented Anaxagoras, De-
mocritus, and Heraclides t ; all who thought it to have firm
solid ground, like to our earth ; containing in it many largt
fields, champion grounds, and divers inhabitants.
Of this opinion likewise was XenophanesJ, as he is
cited for it by Lactantius § ; though that father (perhaps)
did mistake his meaning, whilst he relates it thus : Dixit
Xenophanesy intra concavum lun^ esse aliam terram, et
ibi aliud genus hominum, shnili modo vivere sicut nos in
hac terra, He. As if he had conceived the moon to be a
great hollow body, in the midst of whose concavity, there
should be another globe of sea and land, inhabited by men,
as our earth is ; whereas, it seems to be more likely by
the relation of others, that this philosopher's opinion is to
be understood in the same sense as it is here to be proved.
True indeed, the father condemns this assertion, as an equal
♦ Plut. de plac. plul. 1. 2. c* 13. f Ibid. c. 25.
; Diog. Laert. L S. & Ij^. ^ Div. Imt. 1. 3. c. 13.
44 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
absurdity to that of Anaxagoras, who affirmed the snow to
be black : but no wonder ; for in the very next chapter it
is, that he does so much deride the opinion of those who
thought there were antipodes. So that his ignorance in
that particular, may perhaps disable him fiom being a
competent judge in any other the like point of philosophy.
Unto these agreed Pythagoras, who thought that our eirth
was bpt one of the planets which moved round about the
sun, (as Aristotle relates it of him * ;) and the Pythagoreans
in general did affirm that the moon also was terrestrial, and
that she was inhabited as this lower world : that those liv-
ing creatures and plants which are in her, exceed any of
the like kind with us in the same proportion, as their days
^re longer than ours, viz. by fifteen times. This Pythago-
ras t was esteemed by all, of a most divine wit, as appears
especially by his valuation amongst the Romans; who
being commanded by the oracle to erect a statue to the
wisest Grecian J, the senate determined Pythagoras to be
meant ; preferring him in their judgments before the di-
vine Socrates, whom their gods pronounced the wisest.
Some think him a Jew by birth ; but most agree that he
was much conversant amongst the learneder sort and
priests of that nation, by whom he was informed of manty
secrets ; and (perhaps) this opinion which he vented after-
wards in Greece, where he was much opposed by Aristotle
in 3ome worded disputations, but never confuted by any
folid reason. ^
Tp this opinion of Pythagoras did Plato also assent,
when l^e considered that there was the like eclipse made
by the eqrtl^ ; and this, that it had no light of its own, that
it was so full of spots §. And therefore we may often read
in him and his follpwers, of an aiherea terra^ and lunar es
popuHy an aethereal earth, and inhabiters in the moon ; but
afterwards this was mixed vi^ith many ridiculous fancies :
for some of them considering th^ mysteries implied in tlj^c
* De Coelo, 1. 2. c. 13. f Pl^t- Ibid. cap. 30.
J Piin. Nat. Hist. 1. 34. cap. 6.
§ Flat de conviviis. Macrob. Sonin. Scip. 1. 1. c. IK
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 45
number three, concluded that tliere must necessarily be a
trinity of worlds, whereof the first is this of ours ; the
second in the moon, whose element of water is represented
by the sphere of Mercury, the air by Venus, and the fire by
the sun. And thr.t tl;ic whole universe might the better
end in earth as it began ; they have contrived it, that Mar:}
shall be a sphere of the fire, Jupiter of air, Saturn of wa-
ter ; and above all these, the Klysian fields, spacious and
pleasant places appointed for the habitation of those un*
spotted souls, that eitlier never were imprisoned in, or else
now have freed themselves from any commerce with the
body. Scaliger * speaking of this Platonic fancy, qua in
ires trientes viundum quasi assem diiisit, thinks it is confu-
tation enough to say, it is Plato's. However, for the first
part of this assertion, it viras assented unto by many others,
and by reason of the grossness and inequality of this pla-
net, it was frequently called quasi terra caslestis t, as being
esteemed the sediment and more imperfect part of those
purer bodies ; you may see this proved by Plutarch, in that
delightful work which he properly made for the confirma-
tion of this particular. Witli him agreed Alcinous and
Plotinus, later writers J.
Thus Lucian also in his discourse of a journey to the
moon, where though he does speak many thhigs out of
mirth and in a jesting manner; yet in the beginning of it
he docs intimate that it did contain some serious truths
concerning the real frame of the universe.
The cardinal Cusanus and Jornaudus Brunus §, held a
particular world in every star; and therefore one of them
defining our eartli, he says, it is stella quadam nobilis, qu/e
lunajn et calorem et injiuentiavi habet aliavi, et divasam
ab omnibus aliis siellis \ " a noble star, having ^a distinct
•* light, heat, and influence from all the rest." Unto this
** Nicholas Hill ||, a countryman of ours, was inclined^
♦ Exerc. 62. t X)e facie Lunae.
X (nstit. ad ditcip. plat. Cal. Khodig. 1. 1. c. 4.
§ Cusade doct. ign. 1,2. cap. 12. || Philos. Epicur. par. 434.
46 THAT THfi MOON MAY l&t A WORLl^.
when he said, astrea terra naiura probabilis est: " That
** it is probable the earth hath a starry nature."
But the opinion which I have here delivered, was more
directly proved byMasslin*, Kcplarf? and GalilaeusJ ; each
of them late writers, and famous men for then* singular
skill in astronomy. Keplar calls this world by the name of
Levania, from the Hebrew word rQD^ which signifies the
moon, and our earth by the name of volva^ a 'vohendo;
because it does by reason of its diurnal revolution appear
unto them constantly to turn round ; and therefore he stiles
those who live in that hemisphere which is towards us, by
the title of Subvolvani, because they enjoy the sight of this
earth ; and the others Privolvani, quia sunt privati cdnspectu
voha^ because they are deprived of this privilege. But Julius
Caesar, whom I have above quoted, speaking of their testi-
mony whom I cite for this opinion, viz. Keplar and Ga-
lilseus§, affirms that to his knowledge they did but jest in
those things which they write concerning this ; and as for
any such world, he assuredly knows they never so much as
dreanit of it. But I had rather believe their own words,
tijan his pretended knowledge.
It is true indeed, in some things they do but trifle, but
for the main scope of those discourses, it is as manifest
they seriously meant it, as any indiflFerent reader may easily
discern : as for Galilaeus, it is evident that he did set
down his own judgment and opinion in these things;
Otherwise sure Campanella (a man as well acquainted with
his opinion, and perhaps his person, as Caesar was) would
never have writ. an apology for him. And besides, it is
very likely if it had been but a jest, Galilaeus would never
have suffered so much for it, as report saith afterwards he
did.
And as for Keplar, I will only refer the reader to his
own words, as they are set down in the preface to the
fourth book of his Epitom ; where his purpose is to make
♦ InThesibus. f Dissertatio cum Nunc.
% Nuifciw Sydereus. Somn. Astr. § De pha^om. Lu&ae, c. 4.
THAT THE MOOK MAY BE A WORLD, 4T
an apology for the strangeness of those truths that he was
there to deliver, amongst which there are divers things to
this purpose concerning the nature of the moon. He pro-
cesses that he did not publish them either out of a humour
of contradiction, or a desire of vain-glory, or in a jesting
way to make himself or o/thers merry, but after a consi-
derate and solemn manner for the discovery of the truth.
Now as for the knowledge which Caesar pretends to the
contrary, you may guess what it was by his strange confi-
dence in other assertions, and his boldness in them may
well derogate from his credit in this. For speaking of
Ptolemy*s Hypothesis*, he pronounces this verdict, Impos--
sibile est excentricorum et epicydorum positio^ nee aliquis
est ex matheviaticis adeo stidtiis qui veram illmn existimet,
•* The position of excentrics and epicycles is altogether im-
•* possible, nor is there any mathematician such a fool as
** to think it true." I should guess he could not have
knowledge enough to maintain any other hypothesis, who
was so ignorant in mathematics as to deny that any good
author held this. For I would fain know whether there
were never any that thought the heavens to be solid bo-
dies, and that there were such kinds of motion as is by
those feigned orbs supplied ; if so,. Caesar la Galla was
much mistaken. I think liis assertions are equally true,
that Galilaeus and Keplar did not hold this ; and that there
were none which ever held that other. Thus much for the
testimony of those who were directly of this opinion.
But, in my following discourse, I shall most insist on the
observation of Galilaeus, the inventor of that famous per-
6pective, whereby we may discern the heavens hard by us ;
whereby tliose things which others have formerly guessed
at, are manifested to the eye, and plainly discovered be-
yond exception or doubt ; of which admirable invention,
these latter ages of the world may justly boast, and for this
expect to be celebrated by posterity. It is related of Eu-
doxus, that he wished himself burnt with Phaeton, so he
*^ Cap. 7.
48 THAT THE HOON MAV BE A trOKtU:
might stand over the son to contemplate its nature ; hadf
he lived in tliese days, he might liave enjoyed his wish at
an easier rate ; and scaling the heavens by this glass, might
plainly have discerned what he so much desired. Kcplar
considering those strange discoveries which this perspec-
tive had made, could not choose but cry out in a tspcccKO-
TEia and rapture of admiration, multiscium et quovis seep-
tro preiiosius perspicillum ! an qui ie dextrd tenets ille non
dorninus constituatur operiim Dei? And Johannes Fabri-
cius*, an degant writer, speaking of the same glass, and
for this invention preferring our age before those former
times of greater ignorance, says thus : Adeo sumus superi-
orfs veieribus^ ut quam illi camiinis magici pronunciatu de-
missam representasse pictanHur^ nos non tajitum innocenter
demittamuSy sed etiamfamiliari qiwdam intuitu ejus quasi
conditimiem intueamur. " So much arc we above the an-
** cients, th^t whereas they were fain by their magical
" charms to represent the moon's approach^ we cannot
" only bring her lower with a greater innocence, but may
** also with a more familiar view behold her condition."
And because you shall have no occasion to question the
truth of those experiments which I shall afterwarck urge
from it, I will therefore set down the testimony of an
enemy ; and such a witness hath always been accounted
prevalent : you may see it in the above-named Caesar la
Gallaf, whose words are these. Mcrcurium caduceum
gestantem, cxlestia nunciare, et mortiwrum animas ab in-
feris rjevocare sapiens Jinxit antiquitas. Galilaum vero no-'
vum Jovis interpreiem telescopio caduceo instructum syderd
aperirCf et veteiixm philosophorum niaiies ad svperos revo^
care solers nostra atas videt et adviiraiur, '* Wise anti-
" quity fabled Mercury carrying a rod in his hand to rc-
" late news from heaven, and call back the souls of the
" dead; but it hath been the happiness of our industrious
'* age, to see and admire GaliljRus (the new ambassador of
" the gods}, furnished with his perspective to unfold the
* De macula in sol. obser. f Dcphsnom, cap. 1.
v:i^
THAT THE MOON MAY B£ A WORLD. 49
*< nature of the stars, and awaken the ghosts of the ancient
«* philosophers.** So worthily and highly did these men
esteem of this excellent invention.
Now if you would know what might be done by thit
glass, in the sight of such things as were nearer at hand,
the same author will tell you, when he says *, That by it
those things which could scarce at all be discerned by thl^
eye, at the distance of a mile and a half, might plainly and
distinctly be perceived for sixteen Italian miles, and that as
they were really in themselves, without any transposition
or falsifying at all. So that what the ancient poets were
fain to put in a fable, our more happy age hath found out
in a truth ; and we may discern as far with these eyes
which Galilaeus hath bestowed upon us, as Lynceus could
with those which the podts attributed unto him. But if
you yet doubt whether all these observations were true, the
same author may confirm you, when he says they were
shewed, Non uni aut alterU sed quamplurimiSf nequegrC''
gariis hominibm^ sed pracipuis atque disdplinis omnibus^
necnon 7nathematicis et optids praceptis optime instruetis
seduld ac diligenti inspectione'*^* " Not to one or two, but
•« to very many, and those not ordinary men, but to tlioSe
** who were well versed in mathematics and optics ; and
" that not with a mere glance, but with a sedulous and di»
** ligent inspection." And lest any scruple might remain
unanswered, or you might think the men who beheld al
this, though they might be skilful, yet they came with cre-
dulous minds, and so were more easy to be deluded : He
adds that it was shewed, Viris qui ad experimenta hac
contradicendi ammo accesserantf. ** To such as were
** come with a great deal of prejudice, and an intent of
" contradiction." Thus you may see the certainty of
those experiments which were taken by this glass. I have
spoken the more concerning it, because I shall borrow
many things in my further discourse, from those discove-
ries which were made by it.
* De pha&aom. c. 6. f Cap. 1. t Cap. 5.
VOL. I. £
^ «
50 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOELD^
I hive now cited such authors, both ancient and mo-
dern, who have directly mamtained the same opinion. I
told you likewise in the proposition, that it might pro-
bably be deduced from the tenets of others* : such were
Aristarchus, Philolaus, and Copernicus^ with many other
kter writers, who assented to their hypothesis ; so Joach.
Rhelicus, David Origanus Lansbergius, Guii. Gilbert ; and,
(if I may believe Campanella) innumeri alii Angli et
GaOS; very many others, both English and French, all
who affirmed our earth to be one of the planets, and tlie
aun to be the centre of all, about which the heavenly bo-
dies did move. And how horrid soever this may seem at
the first, yet it is likely enough to be true, nor is there any
maxim or observation in optics (saith Pena) that can dis*
prove it.
Now if our earth were one of the planets (as it is accord-
ing to them) then why may not another of the planets be
an earth ?
Thus have I shewed you the truth of this proposition.
Before I proceed farther, it is requisite that I inform the
reader what method I shall follow in the proving of this
assertion. That there is a world in the moon«
The order by which I shall be guided, will be that which
Aristotle uses in his book De Mundo (if that book were
his).
First, npi rSv ev avr^f of those chief parts which are in
tt; not the elementary and ethereal (as he doth there],
since this does not belong to the present question, but of
the sea and land, &c. Secondly, xepi etvrvjy t«^«v, of those
things which are extrinsical to it, as the seasons, meteors,
and inhabitants.
* See the second book, 1 prop. f Apologia pro Galil:eo.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WO&LD. 51
PROP. VIL
That those spots and brighter partSt which by our sight
iimy be distinguished in the Moon^ do 9hew the difference
betwixt the sea and land in that other world.
FOR the clear proof of this proposition, I shall firs
reckon up and refute the opinions of others concern
ing the matter and form of those spots, and then shew the
greater probability of this present assertion, and how agree-
able it is to that truth wliich is most commonly received
As for the opinions of others concerning these, they have
b^en very many : I will only reckon up those which are
common and remarkable.
Some there are that think those spots do not arise from
any deformity of the parts, but a deceit of the eye, which
cannot at such a distance discdm ail equal light in that
planet ' but these do but only say it, and shew not any
reason for the proof of their opinion. Others think that
there are some bodies betwixt the sun and moon^ which
keeping off the light' in some parts, do by their shadow
produce these spots which we there discern*.
Others would have them to be the figure of the seas or
mountains here below, represented there as in a looking-
glass. But none of those fancies can be true, because the
spots are still the same, and not varied according to the
difference of places ; and besides. Cardan t thinks it is im-
possible that any image should be conveyed so far, as there
to be represented unto us at such at a distance. But it is
commonly related of Pythagoras, that he by writing wha
he pleased in a glass, by the reflexion of the same species
would make those letters to appear in the circle of the
moon, where they should be legible by any other, who
•* So Bede in 1. de Mund. conitlt. f De subtjl. lib. 3.
£ 2
BSi VJftAT THE UodK MAY 6£ A WoULX^i
might at that time be some miles distant from him.
Agrippa * affirms this to be possible, and the way of per-
forming it not unknown to himself, with some others in .
his time. It may be, that bishop Godwin did by the like
means perform those strange conclusions, which he pro-
fesses in his Nuncius Inanimatus; where he pretends, that
he can inform his friends of what he pleases, though they
be an hundred miles distant, ybr/^ etiam^ vet mUliare mU-
Ushnwn (they are his own words), and perhaps a thou*
sand ; and all this in a little space, quicker than the sun can
move.
Now, what conveyance there should be for so speedy a
{passage, I cannot conceive, unless it be carried with the
l^t, than which we know not any thing quicker. But of
this only by the way. However, whether those images
can be represented so or not, yet certain it is, those spots
are not such representations. Some think that when God
had at first created too much earth to make a perfect globe*
not knowing well where to bestow the rest, he placed it in
the moon, which ever since hath so darkened it in some
part3 : but the impiety of this is sufficient confutation, since
it so much detracts from the divine power and wisdom.
The stoics f held that planet to be mixed of fire and air ;
and in their opinion, the variety of its composition caused
her spots : being not ashamed to stile the same body a
goddessj calling it Diana, Minerva, &c. and yet affirm it to
be an impure mixture of flame and smoke, and fuliginous
air. — But this planet cannot consist of fire, saith Plutarch,
because there is not any fuel to maintain it. And the poets
have therefore feigned Vulcan to be lame, because he can
no more subsist without wood or other fuel, than a lame
ihan without a staiF.
Anaxagoras thought all the stars to be of an earthly na*
ture, mixed with some fire ; and as for the sun, he affirmed
ijt to be noting else but a fiery stone : for which latter opi-
*
• Occulu ttulos. I. I. cap. 6. t Plut. de placit. phiL 1. 2. c. 25.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 53
nioiiy the Athenians sentenced him to death ^ ; those zeal*
oud idolaters counting it a great blasphemy to make their
god a stone ; whereas notwithstanding, tl\ey were so sense-
less in their adoration of idols, as to make a stone their
god. This Anaxagoras affirmed the moon to be more ter-
irestrial than the otlier planets, but of a greater purity than
anything here below; and the spots he tliought were no-
thing else but some cloudy parts intermingled with the
light which belonged to that planet ; but I have above de-
stroyed the supposition on which this fancy is grounded.
Pliny t thinks they arise from some drossy stuff, mixed
with that moisture which the moon attracts unto herself;
but he was of their opinion who thought the stars were nou-
rished by some earthly vapours; which you may com-
monly see refuted in the Commentators on the books De
Coelo.
Vitellio and ReinoldusJ affirm the spots to be the
thicker parts of the moon, into which the sun cannot infuse
much light ; and this (say they) is the reason why in the
Bun's eclipses the spots and brighter parts are still in some
measure distinguished, because tlie sun-beams are not able
80 well to penetrate through those thicker, as they may
through the thinner parts of that planet. Of this opinion
also was Csesar la Galla, whose words are these § ; ** The
moon doth there appear clearest, where she is transpi-
cuous, not only through the superficies, but the substance
•* also ; and there she seems spotted, where her body is
'* most opacous.'^ The ground of this his assertion was,
because he thought the moon did receive and bestow her
light by illumination only, and not at all by reflection ; but
this, together with the supposed penetration of the sun-
beams, and the perspicuity of the moon's body I have
above answered and refuted.
* J<Mepbuil.d.c(m. App. August, de Civit. Dei^ I. \S. c. 41.
t Nat. Hift^J,-2. c. 9. X ^P^* ^i^- ^* Comment, inturb. p. 164.
§ £x qua pafte luna est transpicua non solum secundum superflciem,
ted etiam lecunduxn tubstantiam^ eatenus clara« ex qua autem parte
opacaest, eatenus obtcura videtur. De Phaenom. cap. 1 1.
54 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
The more common and general opinion Is, that the
spots are the thinner parts of the moon, which are less able
to reflect the beams that they receive from the sun, and
this is most agreeable to reason ; for if the stars are there-
fore brightest, because they are thicker and more solid than
their orbs, then it will follow, that those parts of the moon
which have less light, have also less thickness *. It was the
providence of nature (say some) that so contrived that pla-
cet to have these spots within it ; for since that is nearest
to those lower bodies which are so full of deformity, it is
requisite that it should in some measure agree with them ;
. and as in this inferior world, the higher bodies are the most
complete, so also in the heavens, perfection is ascended
unto by degrees, and the moon being the lowest, must be
the least pure ; and therefore Philo the Jew interpreting
Jacob's dream concerning the ladder t> doth in an allegory
. shew how that in the fabric of thp world, ajl things grow
perfecter as they grow higher i and this is the reason (saith
he) why the moon doth not consist of any pure simple
matter, but is mixed with air, which shews so darkly within
her body.
But this cannot be a sufijicient reason; for though it
were true that naturg did frame every thing perfecter as it
wa§ higher, yet i^ it as true that nature frames every thing
fully perfect for that office to which she intends it. Now
had §he intended the moon merely to reflect the sun-
beams, and give light, the spots then had not so much ar-
gued her providence, as her unskilfulness and oversight, as
if in the haste of her work she could not telLhow to make
that body exactly fit for that office to which she intended
itj.
It is likely then that she had some other end which
moved her to produce this variety ; j^nd this, in all proba*
bility, was her intent, to make it a fit body for habitation,
with the same conveniences of sea and land, as this infe-
rior world doth partake of. For since the moon is such a
* Albert, mag. de Coaevis. Q. 4. Art. 21. CoUeg. Cqn.
f De spmniw, J Scalig. jsxercit. 6)?.
'.T,
» ^ THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLP. $5
vast, such a solid and opacous body, like our earth (as was
above proved) why may it not be probable that those thinner
and thicker parts appearing in her^ do shew the difference
betwixt the sea and land in that other world ? And Gali«
laeus doubts not, but that if our earth were visible at the
same distance, there would be the like appearance of it.
If we consider the moon as another habitable earth, then
the appearances of it will be altogether exact and beauti-
ful, and may argue unto us that it is fully accomplished for
all those ends to which Providence did appoint it. But
consider it barely as a star or light, and then there will ap«
pear in it much iipperfection and deformity, as being of an
impure dark substance, and so unfit for the office of that
nature.
As for the form of those spots, some of the vulgar think
they represent a man, and the poets guess it is the boy
Endymion, whose company she loves so well, that she car--
ties him with her : others will have it only to be the face
of a man, as the moon is usually pictured ; but Albertus
thinks rather, that it represents a lion with his tail towards
the east, and his head the west ; and some others * have
thought it to be very much like a fox ; and certainly it is
as much like a lion as that in the zodiac, or as ursa major
is like a bear.
I should guess that it represents one of these as well as
another, and any thing else as well as any of these, since
it is but a strong imagination which fancies such in^ages, as
school-boys usually do in the marks of a wall, whereas
there is not any similitude in the spots themselves, which
rather like our sea, in respect of the land, appears under a
ru^ed and conftjsed fig;ure,. and doth not represent any
distinct image : so that both in respect of the matter and
the form, it may be probable enough that those spots and
brighter parts may shew the distinction betwixt the sea and
)^nd in that other world.
* Eusebius Nieremb. I^ist. Nat. 1. S. c. 15.
56 THAT THE M00» MAY ^E A WORLD-
PROP. vin.
The spots represent the sea^ and the brighter parts the
land.
WHEN I first compared the nature of our earth and
water with those appearances in the moon, I con-
cluded contrary to the proposition, that the brighter parts
represented the water, and the spots the land. Of this
opinion likewise was Keplar at the first *. But my second
•thoughts, and the reading of others, have now convinced
me (as after he was) of the truth of that proposition which
I have now set down. Befpre I cotpe to the confirmation
of it, I shall mention those scruples which at first made me
4oubt the truth of this opinion.
1. It maybe objected, it is probable, if there be any
sucb sea and land as ours, that it bears some proportion and
similih^de with ours : but now this proposition takes away
^U likeness betwixt them. For whereas the superficies of
pur earth is but the third part of the whole surface in the
globe, two parts bei«ig overspread with the water (as Sca-
Jiger observes t)> yet here, according to this opinion, the
sea should be less than the land, since there is not so much
of the bespotted as there is of the enlightened parts ;
wherefore it is probable that there is no such thing at all,
or else that the brighter parts are the sea.
• 2. The water, by reason of the smoothness of its super-
ficies, seems better able to reflect the sun-beams than the
earth, which in most places is so full of ruggedness, of grass
and trees^ and such like impediments of refle£lion ; and
besides, common experience shews that the water shines
with a greater and n^ore glorious brightness than the earth ;
therefore it should seem that the spots are the earth, and
* Opt. Astro, c. 6. num. 9. pissert. cum nuncio Qal.
t Exercit. 38;
* J
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORL0. 57
the brighter parts the water. But to the first it may be
answered.
1. Tl^ere is no great probability in this consequence,
that because it is so with us, therefore it must be so with
the parts of the moon ; for since there is such a difference
betwixt them in divers other respects, they may not per-
haps agree in this.
2. That assertion of Scaliger* is not by all granted for
a truth. Fromondus with others think that the superficies
off the sea and land, in so much of the world as is already
discovered, is equal and of the same extension.
3. The orb of thick and vaporous air which encompasses
the moon, makes the brighter parts of that planet appear
bigger than in themselves they are ; as I shall shew after*
Wards.
To the second it may be answered, That though the
water be of a smooth superficies, and so may seem most fit
^ reverberate the light, yet because it is of a perspicuous
nature, therefore the beams must sink into it, and cannot
so strongly and clearly be reflected. Sicut in spectdo ubi
flumbum abrasum fuerit (^aith Cardan), as in looking-
louses, '^ where part of the lead is razed of!; and nothing
Ml bebiiid to reverberate the image, the species must there
pass throu^, and not back again: so it is where the
beams penetrate and sink into the substance of the body,
there cannot be such an immediate and strong reflection, as
vrhen tbey are beat back firom the superficies ; and there-
4oTC the sun causes a greater heat by far upon the land,
tiian upon the water. Now as for that experiment, where
(it is said, that the waters have a greater brightness than the
land ; I answer. It is true only there where they represent
the image of the sun, or some bright cloud, and not in other
{>kces; especially if we look upon them at any great dis-
taace, as is very plain by common observation.
And it is certain, that from any high mountain the land
does appear a great deal brighter than any lake or river.
* DeMeteorls, i. 5. c. 1. Art. 1.
58 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
This may yet be farther illustrated by the similitude of a
looking-glass hanging upon a wall in the sun-shine ; where,
if the eye be not placed in the just line of reflection from
the glass, it is manifest that the wall will be of a brighter
appearance than the glass. True indeed, in the line of re-
flection, the light of the glass is equal almost unto that
which comes immediately from the sun itself; but now
this is only in one particular place, and so is not like that
brightness which we discern in the moon ; because this
does appear equally in several situations, like that of the
wall, which does seem bright as well from every place, as
from any one. And therefore the roughness of the wall,
or (as it is in the objection) the ruggedness of our earth, is
so far from being an hindrance of such a reflection as there
is from tlie moon, that it is rather required as a necessary
condition unto it. We may conceive that in every rough
body, there are, as it were, innumerable superficies, dis-
posed unto an innumerable diversity of inclinations. Ita
tii nulltis sit loaiSf ad quern non pertingant plurimi radii
reflexi a plurimis superficieadisy per omnem corporis scabri
radiis luminosispercussi superficiem dispersis*. " So that
*^ there is not any place unto which there are not some
** beams reflected from these diverse superficies, in the
" several parts of such a rugged body." But yet (as I
said before) the earth does receive a great part of its light
by illumination, as well as by reflection.
So that notwithstanding those doubts, yet this propo-
sition may remain true. That the spots may be the sea, and
the brighter parts the land. Of this opinion was Plu-
tarchf : unto him assented Keplar and Galilasus, whose words
are these : Si quis veterum Pyihagoreorum senttniiavi ex^
suscitare velity lunam scilicet esse quasi tellurem alteram ejus
pars lucidior terrenam superfidemy ohscurior vero aqueam
magis congrue reprasentet. Mihi autem dubium/uitnun^
quarn terrestris globi d longe conspectiy atque a radiis sola^
* Galilieus System. Coll. I.
f De facie Lun. Dissertatio Nunc, ^yd*
4C
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOULD. 69
tibus perjusif terream superjiciem clarioremy obscuriorem
vero ajueam sese in conspectum daturam. *^ If any man
** have a mind to renew the opinion of the Pythagoreans,
. ** That the moon is another earth ; then her brighter parts
may fitly represent the earth's superficies, and tlie darker
part the water : and for my part, I never doubted but
that our earthly globe being shined upon by the sun, and
** beheld at a great distance, the land would appear bright-
** est, and the sea more obscurely*" The reasons may
be,
1. That which 1 urged about the foregoing chapter ;
because the water is the thinner part, and therefore must
give less light.
Since the stars and planets, by reason of their brightness,
are usually concluded to be the thicker parts of tlieir orb.
2. Water is in itself of a blacker colour (saith Aristotle*),
and therefore more remote from light than the earth. Any
part of the ground being moistened with rain, does look
much more darkly than when it is dry.
3. It is observed that the secondary light of tlie moon
(which afterwards is proved to proceed from our earth) is
sensibly brighter unto us, for two or three days before the
conjunction, in the morning when she appears eastward,
than about the same time after the conjunction, when she
is seen in the west. The reason of which must be this,
because that part of the earth which is opposite to the
moon in the east, has more land in it than sea. Whereas
on tl^e contrary, the moon when she is in the west, is
shined upon by that part of our earth where there Js more
sea than land ; from whence it will follow with good pro-
bability, that the earth does cast a greater light than the
water.
4. Because observation tells us, that the spotted parts are
always smooth and equal, having everywhere an equality
of light, when once tJiey are enlightened by the sun ;
whereas tlie brighter parts are full of rugged gibbosities
* In lib. de coloribm.
60 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
end mountains, having many shades in them 9 as I shall
sliew more at large afterwards.
That in this planet there must be seas, Campanella * en-
deavours to prove out of Scripture, interpreting the waters
above the firmament, spoken in Genesis, to be meant of
the sea in this world. For (saith he) it is not likely that
there are any such waters above the orbs to moderate that
heat which they receive from their swift motion (as som0
of the fathers think). Nor did Moses mean the angels,
which may be called spiritual waters, as Origen and Austinf
would have it, for both these are rejected by the general
consent : nor could he mean any waters in the second re-
gion, as most commentators interpret it. For first there is
nothing but vapours, which though they are afterwards
turned into water, yet while they remain there, they are
only the matter of that element, which may as well be
fire, or earth, or air. 2. Those vapours are not above the
expansum, but in it. So that he thinks there is no other
way to salve all, but by making the planets several worlds
with sea and land, with such rivers and springs as we have
here below : especially since Esdras speaks of the springs
above the firmament f. But I cannot agree with him in
this, nor do I think that any such thing can be proved out
of scripture.
Before I proceed to the next position, I shall first answer
some doubts which might be made against the generality
of this truth, whereby it may seem impossible tliat there
sliould be either sea or land in the moon : for since she
moves so swiftly as astronomers observe, why then does
there nothing fall from her, or why doth she not shake
something out by the celerity of her revolution ? I answer,
You must know that the inclination of every heavy body
to its proper centre, doth sufficiently tie it unto its place ;
so that suppose any thing were separated, yet must it ne-
* Apologia pro Galilaeo.
f Vide leroti. Epist. ad Pammachium. Coufigssion. 1. 13. c. 32*
Retracted lib. 2. Retr. cap. 6.
jaEsdr. iv. 7.
THAT THE ItOOK MAY BE A WORLD. 6
ccsaarily return again. And there is no more danger of
their falling into our world, than there is fear of our falling .
into the moon.
But yet there are many fabulous relations of such things
as have dropped thence *. There is a tale of the Nemeafl
lion that Hercules slew, which first rushing among the
herds out of his unknown den in the mountain of Cythe-
ron in Boeotia, the credulous people thought he was sent
from their goddess the moon. And if a whirlwind did
chance to snatch any thing up, and afterwards rain it down
again, the ignorant multitude were apt to believe that it
dropt from heaven. Thus Avicenna relates the story of a
calf which fell down in a storm, the beholders thinking it
a moon-calf, and that it fell thence. So Cardan travelling
upon the Apennine mountains, a sudden blast took off his
hat, which if it had been carried far, he thinks the pea-
sants, who had perceived it to fail, would have sworn it
had rained hats. After some such manner many of our
prodigies come to pass, and the people are willing to be-
lieve any thing which they may relate to others as a ver/
strange and wonderful event. I doubt not but the Trojan
Palladium, the Roman Minerva, and our lady's church at
Loretto, with many sacred relics preserved by the papists,
might drop from the moon as well as any of these.
But it may be again objected, Suppose there were a bul-
let shot up in that world, would not the moon run away
from it before it could fall down, since the motion of her
Body (being every day round our earth) is far swifter than
the other, and so the bullet must be left beliind, and at
length fall down to us ? To this I answer,
1. If a bullet could be shot so far till it came to the cir-
cumference of those things which belong to our centre,
then it would fall down to us.
2. Though there were some heavy body a great height
in that air, yet would the motion of that magnetical globe
to which it did belong, by an attractive virtue still hold it
within its convenient distance, so that whether their earth
* Vide Guli. Nubrigens. de rebus Anglica. lib. 1.
62
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
moved or stood stilJ, yet would the same violence ca$t a
body from it equaUy far. That I aiay the plainer express
my meaning, I wiU set down this diagram.
Suppose this earth were A, which was to move in the
circle C, D, and let the bullet be supposed at B, within its
proper verge ; I say, whether this earth did stand still, or
move swiftly towards D, yet the bullet would still keep at
the same distance, by reason of that magnetic virtue of the
centre (if I may so speak) whereby all things within its
sphere are attracted with it. So that the violence to the
bullet, being nothing else but that whereby it is removed
from its centre, therefore an equal violence can carry a
body from its proper place but at an equal distance, whe-
ther or no this earth where its centre is, does stand still or
move.
The impartial reader may find sufficient satisfaction for
this and such other arguments as may be urged against the
motion of that earth, in the writings of Copernicus and his
followers ; unto whom^ for brevity sake^ I will refer tbcm.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 63
PROP. IX.
That there are high mountains^ deep valliesy and spacious
plains in the body of the Moon.
THOUGH there are some who think mountains to be
a deformity to the earth, as if they were either beat
up by the flood, or else cast up like so many heaps of rub-
bish left at the creation ; yet if well considered, they will
be found as much to conduce to the beauty and conve-
niency of the universe, as any of the other parts. Nature
(saith Pliny ^) purposely framed them for many excellent
uses; partly to tame the violence of greater rivers, to
strengthen certain joints within the veins and bowels of the
earth, to break the force of the sea's inundation, and for
the safety of the earth's inhabitants, whether beasts or
men. That they make much for the protection of beasts,
the Psalmist testifies f ; The highest hills are a refuge
for the wild goats, and the rocks for conies. The kingly
p]:ophet had likewise learned the safety of these by his
own experience, when he also was fain to make a moun-
tain his refuge from the fiiry of liis master Saul, who per-
secuted him in the wilderness.
True indeed, such places as these keep their neighbours
poor, as being most barren, but yet they preserve them
safe, as being most strong ; witness our unconquered Wales
and Scotland, whose gi*eatest protection hath been the na-
tural strength of their country ; so fortified with moun-
tains, that these have always been unto them sure retreats
from the violence and oppression of others. Wherefore
a, good author doth rightly call them nature's bulwarks,
cast up at God Almighty's own charges, the scorns and
curbs of victorious armies. Which made the Barbarians
in Curtius so confident of their own safety, when they
* Nat. Hist. 1. 36. c. 5. f Psal. civ. ver. IS.
64t THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOUtO.
were once retired to an inaccessible mountain ; that when
Alexander's legate had brought them to a parley, and per-
suading them to yield, told them of his master's victories,
what seas and wildernesses he had passed ; they replied,
that all that might be, but could Alexander fly too ? Over
the seas he might have ships, and over the land horses,
but he must have wings before he could get up thither.
Such safety did those barbarous nations conceive in the
mountains whereunto they were retired. Certainly then
such useful parts were not the effect of man's sin, or pro-
duced by the world's curse, the flood ; but rather at the
first created by the goodness and providence of the Al-^'
mighty.
This truth is usually concluded firom these and the like
arguments.
1. Because the scripture itself, in the description of
that general deluge, tells us, it overflowed the highest
mountains.
2. Because Moses who writ long after the flood, does
yet give the same description of places and rivers, as they
had before ; which could not well have been if this had
made so strange an alteration.
3. It is evident that the trees did stand as before. For
otherwise, Noah could not so well have concluded, that
the waters were abated, from this reason, because the dove
brought an olive leaf in her mouth, when she was sent
fbrth a second time : whereas had the trdes been rooted
up, she might have taken it the first time, from one of
them as it was floating on the top of the waters. Now if
the motion of the water was not so violent as to subvert
the trees, much less was it able to cast up such vast heaps
as the mountainsT
4. When tlie scripture doth set forth unto us the poWcr
and immensity of God by the variety or usefulness of the
creatures which he hath made ; amongst the rest it doth
often mention the mountains. Psal. civ. 8. item, cviii. 9
Isa. xl. 1 2. And therefore it is probable they were created
at the first Unto this I might add that in other places^
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 65
divine wisdom in shewing of its own antiquity; saith that
he was fix)m the beginning, before the earth or the moun-
tains were brought forth *•,
5. If we may trust the relations of antiquity f, there
were many monuments left undefaced after the flood.
So that if I intend to prove that the moon is such a ha-
bitable world as this is ; it is requisite that I shew it to
have the same conveniences of habitation as this hath.
And here if some Rabbi or Chymic were to handle the
point, they would first prove it out of scripture, from that
place in Moses his blessing, where he speaks of the an-
cient mountains and lasting hills, Deut. 33. n)^y\ iDp ♦'Tin
oViy for having immediately before mentioned those
blessings which should happen unto Joseph by the in-
fluence of the moon, he does presently exegetically ite-
rate them, in blessing him with the chief things of the
ancient mountains and lasting hills ; you may also see the
same expression used in Jacob's blessing of Josepli %>
But however we may deal pro or con in philosophy, yet
we must not be too bold with divine truths, or bring scrip-
ture to patronize any fancy of our own ; tliough, (perhaps)
it be a truth. I am not of their mind, who think it a
good course to confirm philosophical secrets from the let-
ter of the scripture, or by abusing some obscure text in
it. Methinks it favours too much of that melancholy hu-
mour of the chymics, who, aiming in all their studies at the
making of gold, do persuade themselves, that the most
learned and subtile of the ancient authors, in all their ob-
scure places do mean some such sense as may make to
their purpose. And hence it is that they derive such
strange mysteries from the fables of the poets ; and can
tell you what great secret it was, that antiquity did hide
under the fiction of Jupiter being turned into a shower of
gold: of Mercury's being made the interpreter of the
Gods : of the Moon's descending to the earth for the Iovq
* Prov. viii. 55. Psal. xc. 'J. f Joseph. Ant. 1. 1. cap. 3,
t Gen. xlix. 26.
VOL. I. F
66 *' THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WOllLD.
of Endymion : with such ridiculous interpretations of these
and the like fables, which any reasonable considering man
cannot conceive to proceed from any but such as are dis-
tracted. No less fantastical in this kind are the Jewish
Rabbles ; amongst whom, is not any opinion* whether in
nature or policy, whether true or false, but some of them,
by a cabalistical interpretation can father it upon a dark
place of scripture, or (if need be) upon a text that is clean
contrary. There being not any absurdity so gross and in-
credible, for which these abusers of the text, will not find
out an argument. Whereas, it is the more natural way,,
and should be observed in all controversies, to. apply onto
every thing the proper proofs of it ; and when we deal
with philosophical truths, to keep ourselves within the
bounds of human reason and authority.
But this by the way. For the better proof of this pro-
portion, I might here cite the testimony of Diodorus, who
thought the moon to be full of rugged places, vehU terres^
iribus iumuUs supercUiosam; but he erred much in some
circumstances of this opinion, espeqally where he says,
there is an island amongst the Hyperboreans, wherein
those hills may to the eye be plainly discovered ; and for
this reason Cslius^ calls him a fabulous writer. But you
may see more express authority for the proof of this in
the opinions of Anaxagoras and Democritusf, who held
that this planet was full of champion grounds, mountains
and vallies. And this seemed likewise probable unto Au*
gustinvs Nisus %$ whose words are these : Forsitan rum est
remotum dictre lurue partes esse diversas^ veluti stmt par^
ies terray qvarum alia sunt vaUosa^ alia montosa^ ex qua-
rum differentia effid potest fades ilia lumt^ nee est rationi
dissonunif nam luna est corpus imperfecte spharicumy cum
sit corpus ab ultimo ccelo elongatum^ ut supra dixit Aristo^
teles. ^< Perhaps, it would not be amiss to say that the
<* parts of the moon were divers, as the parts of this
* Lect. aut. L I.e. 15. f Plut. de plac. LS. «. 25.
X De CoBk). L 2. part. 49.
t:
THtiT THt Moon maV be a world. 67
** earth, whereof some are vallies, and some mountains;
** from the difference of whichy some spots in the moon
** may proceed ; nor is this against reason ; for that pla-
** net cannot be perfectly spherical, since it is so remote a
♦* body from the first orb, as Aristotle had said before."
You m^y see this truth assented unto by Blancanus the
Jesuit*, and by, him confirmed with divers reasons. Kep-
lar hath observed in the moon's eclipses, that the division
of her enlightened part from the shaded, was made by a
crooked unequal linef* of which there cannot be any pro-
bable cause conceived, unless it did arise from the rugged-
ness of that planet ; for it cannot at all be proxluced from
the shade of any mountains here upon earth ; because
these would be so lessened before they could reach $o,
liigh in a conical shadow, that they would not be at all
sensible unto us (as might easily be demonstrated) ; nor
can it be conceived what reason of this difference there
should be in the sun. Wherefore there being ho other
body that hath any thing to do in eclipses, we must neces-
sarily conclude, that it is caused by a variety of parts in
the moon itself; and what can these be but its gibbosities ?
now if you should ask a reason why there should be such
a multitude of these in that planet, the -same Keplar shall
jest you out an answer. Supposing (saith he) that those
inhabitants are bigger than any of us, in the same pro-
pottipn as their days are longer than ours, viz. by fifteen
times ; it may be, for want of stones to erect such vast
houses as were requisite for their bodies, they are fain to
dig great and round hollows in the earth $, where they may
both procure water for their thirst, and turning about with
the shade, may avoid those great heats which otherwise
they would be liable unto. Or if you will give Caesar la
Gatla leave to guess in the same manner, he would rather
think that those thirsty nations cast up so many and so
♦ De^Mundi fob. par. 3. c. 4. t Astron. Opt. c. 6»inim. 9.
) Kep. appen. Seienogra.
F 2
68 THAT THE HOOK HAY BE A W01.LD.
great heaps of earth in digg^g of their wine cellars ; but
this only by the way.
I shall next produce the eye-wttness ofGa)ilxu$*, on
which I most of all depend for the proof of this proposi-
sition ; when he beheld the new moon through his per-
spective, it appeared to him under a rugged and spotted^
figure, seeming to have the darker and enlightened parts
divided by a tortuous line, having some parcels of light at
- a. good distance irom the other ; and this difference is so
remariuble, that you may easily perceive it through one
of those ordinary perspectives, which are commonly sold
amongst us ; but for your better apprehending of what I
deliver, I will set down the figure as 1 find it in Ga-
illkeus.
Suppose S C B to represent the appearance of the
Moon's body being in a sexttle, you may see some brighter
parts separated at a pretty distance from the other, which
can be nothing else but a reBection of the sun-beams upon
some parts that are h^her than the rest ; and those obscure
^bouties which stand out towards the enlightened parts,
• Nundtts Sjdeieui.
THAT THE MOOK MAY BE A WORLD. 69
must be such hollow and deep places whereto the rays can-
not reach. But when the moon is got farther off from the
sun, and come to that fulness as this line B B doth repre^
sent her under ; then do these parts also receive an equal
light, excepting only that difference which doth appear
betwixt their sea and land. And if you do consider how
any ru^ed body would appear being enlightened, yoii
would easUy conceive that it mus: necessarily seem under
some such gibbous unequal form, as the moon is here re**
presented. Now for the infallibility of these appearances^
I shall refer the reader to that which hath been said in
the sixth proposition.
But Caesar la Galla affirms, that all tliese appearances
may consist with a plain superficies, if we suppose the
parts of the body to be some of them diaphanous, and
some opacous ; and if you object that the light which is
conveyed to any diaphanous part in a plain superficies,
must be by a continued line ; whereas here there appear
many brighter parts among the obscure at some distance
from the rest : to this he answers, it may rise from some
secret conveyances and channels within her body, that do
consist of a more diaphanous matter ; which being co-
vered over with an opacous superficies, the light passing
through them may break out a great way off; whereas the
other parts betwixt, ipay still remain dark. Just as the river
Arethusa in Sicily, which runs under ground for a great
way, and afterwards breaks out again. But, because this
is one of the chiefest fancies, whereby he thinks he hath
fully answered the argument of this opinion, I will there?
fore set down hi^ answer in his own words, lest the reader
might suspect more in them than I have expressed *• Non
€st imp&ssibile cacos ductm diaphard K ptrspicui corporis,
sed opaca superficie protendh usqute in diaphanam alU
quam ex profundo in superficiem emergeniem partem,
per quos ductus lumen lango postmodum interstitio erum^
pat, Kc. But I reply, if the superficies betwixt these two
* Cap. 11.
70 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
two enlightened parts remain dark because of its opacity ;
then would it always be dark, and the sun could not make
it partdke of light more than it could of perspicuity. But
this contradicts all experiei\ce, as you may see in Gali-
teus, who aifirms that when the sun comes nearer to his
opposition, then that which is betwixt them both, is en-
lightened as well as either. Nay, this opposes his own
eye-witness ; for he confesse$ himself that he saw this by
the glass. He had said before, that he came to see those
Strange sights discovered by Galil^us his glass, with an
intent of contradiction ; and you may read that confirmed
in the weakness of this answer, which rather bewrays ap
obstinate, than a persuaded will ; for otherwise sure h^
would never have undertook to have destroyed such cer-
tain proof with so groundless a fancy.
That instance of Galilaeus^, would have been a better
evasion, had this author been acquainted with it; whp
plight then have compared the moon to that which we
call mother of pearl, which though it be most exactly po-
lished in the sypei^cies of it, yet will seem unto the eye
as if there were divers swelliags and risings in its several
parts. But yet, this neither woqld not well have shifted
the experiment of the perspective. For these rugged parts
do not only appear upon one side of the moon, but as the
' sun does turn about in divers places, so do they also cast
their shadow. When the moon is in her increase, then
do they cast their shadows to the east. When she is in
the decrease, and the sun on the other side of her, then
likewise may wc discover the^e brighter parts casting theii;^
shadows westward. Whereas in the full moon there are
none pf all these to be seen. i
But it may be objected, that it is almost impossible, and
^together unlikely, that in the moon there should be any
mountains so high as those observations make them. For
i6 but suppose, according to the common principles, that
the mQoa's diameter unto the earth's, is very near^ to thf
■* Syst. mund. col. 1.
THAT THE I400N MAY BE A WORLD. tl
proportion, of two to seveof. Suppose withal that the
earth's diameter contains about 7000 Italian miles, and the
moon's 2000 (as is commonly granted.) Now Galilanis
hath observed, that Some parts have been enlightened, when
they were the twentieth part of the diameter distant from
the common term of illumination. From whence it must
necessarily follow, that there may be some mountains
in the moon so high, that they are able to cast a sha-
dow a hundred miles ofF. An opinion that sounds like a
prodigy or a fiction ; wherefore it is likely that either those
appearances are caused by somewhat else besides moun-
tains, qi else those are fallible observations ; from whence
may follow such improbable, inconceivable consequences.
But to this I answer ;
1. You must consider the height of the mountains is
but very little, if you compare them to the length of their
shadows. Sir Walter Rawleigh* observes that the mount
Athos, now called Lacas, casts its shadow 300 furlongs,
which is above 37 miles ; and yet that mount is none of the
highest. Nay Solinus + (whom I should rather believe in
tliis kind) affirms that this mountain gives his shadow
quite over the sea, from Macedon to the isle of Lemnos,
which is 700 furlongs, or 84 miles, and yet according to
the common reckoning it doth scarce reach 4 miles up-
wards in its perpendicular height.
2. I affirm that there are very high mountains in the
moon. Keplar and Galilaeus think that they are higher
than any which are upon our earth* But I am not of
their opinion in this, because I suppose they go upon a
false ground, whilst they conceive that the highest moun-
tain upon the earth is not above a mile perpendicular.
Whereas it is the qommon opinion, and found true
enough by observation, that Olympus, Atlas, Taurus and
£)mus, with many others, are much above this height.
Tenariffa, in the Canary islands, is commonly related to be
above 8 miles perpendicular, and about this height (say
♦ Hist. 1. 1. cap. 7. sect. 11. f Poly. Hist. c. 21.
73 THAT THE MOON HAY BE A WORLD.
some) is the mount Perjacaca in America. Sir Walter
Rawleigh* seems to think that the highest of these is
near 30 miles upright : nay Aristotle, speaking of Caucasus
in Asia, affinus it to be visible for 560 n^es, as some in-
terpreters find by computation ; from which it will follow,
that it was 78 miles perpendicularly high ; as you may see
confirmed by Jacobus Mazonius t. and out of him in Blan-
canus the Jesuit. But this deviates from the truth more
in excess than the other doth in defect. However, though
these in the moon are not so high as some amongst us ;
yet certain it is they are of a great height, and some of
them at the least four miles perpendicolar. This I shall
prove from the observation of Galilaeus, whose glass can
shew to the senses a proof beyond exception ; and cer-
tainly that man must needs be of a most timorous faith,
who dares not believe his own eye.
By that perspective you may pl^nly discern some en-<
lightened parts (which are the mountains) to be distant
from the other about the twentieth part of the diameter.
From .whence it will follow, that Uiose mounUius must
necessarily be at the least four Italian mites in height.
f C'oTnparatio Aritc.
Matth. Arlitloc. US.
• Meteor. L I.e. 11.
m. Plaume, leci. 3. c. 5. E»po*t. i
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. IS
For let B D E F be the body of the moon, ABC will
be a ray or beam of the sun, which enlightens a mountain
at A, and B is the point of contingency ; the distance betwixt
A and B must be supposed to be the twentieth part of the
diameter, which' is an 100 miles, for so far are some en-
lightened parts severed from the common term of illumi-
nation. Now the aggregate of the quadrate from A B a
hundred, and BG 1000 will be 1010000; unto which the
quadrate arising from A G must be equal ; according to
. the 47th proposition in the first book of elements. There-
fore the whole line A G is somewhat more than 104, and
the distance betwixt H A must be above 4 miles, which
was the thing to be proved.
But it may be again objected, if there be such rugged
parts, aitd so high mountains, why then cannot we dis-
cern them at this distance ? Why doth the moon appear
unto us so exactly round, and not rather as a wheel with
teetli ?
I answer, by reason of too great a distance ; for if the
whole body appears to our eye so little, then those parts
which bear so small a proportion to tlie whole, will not at
all be sensible.
But it may be replied, if there were any such remarkable
hillSy why does not the limb of the moon appear like a
wheel with teeth, to those who look upon it through the
great perspective* on whose witness you so much depend?
Or what reason is there that she appears as exactly round
through it, as she doth to the bare eye? certainly then
either there is no such thing as you imagine, or else the
glass fails much in this discovery.
To tills I shall answer out of Galilaeus.
]. You must know, that there is not merely one rank
of mountains above the edge of the moon, but divers or-
ders, one mountain behind another, and so there is some-
what to hinder those void spaces which otherwise, per-
|iaps, might appear.
Now where there be many hills, the ground seems even
(o a man that can see the tops of all. Thus when the sea
74 THAT THE MOON MAY fi£ A WOB.LD.
rages, and many vast waves are lifted up, yet all inay ap-
pear plain enough to one that stands at the shore. So
where there are so many hills, the inequality will be less
remarkable if it be discerned at a distance.
2. Though there be mountains in that part which ap-
pears unto us to be the limb of the moon, as well as in
any other place, yet the bright vapours hide their appear-
ance ; for there is an orb of thick vaporous air that doth
immediately compass the body of the moon ; which though
it have not so great opacity, as to terminate the sight, yet
beixig once enlightened by the sun, it doth represent the
body of the moon under a greater form, and hinders our
sight from a distinct view of her true circumference. But
of this in the next chapter.
3. Keplar hath observed*, that in the sokry eclipses,
when the rays may pass through this vaporous air, there
are some gibbosities to be discerned in the limb of the
moon.
I have now sufficiently proved, that there are hills in the
moon ; and hence it may seem likely that there is also a
world : for since providence hath some special end in all
its works, certainly then these mountains were not pro-
duced in vain ; and what more probable meaning can we
conceive there should be, than to make that place conve-
nient for habitation.
* Somn. Attr. not. 207.
*" ^
THAT THU MOON MAY B& A WOX.LD. 75
PROP. X.
That there is an Atmo-spharay or an orb of gross, vapo*
rous air immediately encofnpassing the body of the
Moon,
AS that part of our air which is nearest to the earth is
of a thicker substance than the other, by reason it is
always mixed with some vapours which are continually ex-
haled into it ; so is it equally requisite, that if there be a
world in the moon, that, the air about that should be alike
qualified with ours. Now that there is such an orb of
gross air, wa^ first of all (for ought I can read) observed by
Muslin *, afterwards assented unto by Keplar and Galilaeus,
and since by Baptista Cittacus, Scheiner, with others, all
pf them confirming it by the same arguments ; which I
shall only cite, and then leave this proposition.
1. It is not improbable that there should be a spheie of
grosser air about the moon ; because it is observed that
there are such kind of evaporations which proceed from
the sun itself. For there are discovered divers moveable
spotSy like clouds, that do encompass his body; which
those authors who have been most frequently versed 'u\
these kind of experiments and studies, do conclude to be
nothing else but evaporations from it. The probability
and tf uth of which observations may also be inferred from
some other appearances. As,
1. It hath been observed that tl^e sun hath sometimes
for the space of four days together f, appeared as dull an^
Tuddy almost as the moon in her eclipses , insomuch that
the stars have been seen at mid-day. Nay, he hath been
constantly darkened for almost a whole year, and never
shined but with a kind of heavy and duskish light, so that
* Vide Eu8eb. Nicrem. de Nat. Hist. 1. 2. c. 11.
I So A. D. 1547, April 2ith to the 9$th.
76 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
there was scarc6 heat enough to ripen the fruits. As it
was about the time when Cassar was killed. Which was
recorded by some of the poets. Thus Virgil speaking of
the sun*
lUe ctiam extincto tniseratus Cdtsare Romam,
Cum caput obscura nitidum ferrugine texif,
Impiaque dsternam iitnuerunt specula noctetn*.
He pitying Eome when at great Caesar dy'd«
Hit head within a mourning vail did hide.
And that the wicked guilty world did fright
With doubtful fears of an eternal night.
Ovid likewise, speaking of his death,
. Solis quoque tristis imago
Lurida soUicitis prtebebat lamina terris, f
; ■■ The sun's sad image then
Did yield a lowering light to fearful men.
Now these appearances could not arise from any lower
vapour : for then, !• They would not have been so univer-
sal as they were, being seen through all Europe : or else,
2. That vapour must have covered the stars as well as the
sun, which yet notwithstanding were then plainly discerned
in the day-time. You may see tliis argument illustrated
in another the like case, chap. 12. Hence then it will fol-
low, that this fuliginous matter, which did thus obscure the
son, must needs be very near his body ; and if so, then
what can we more probably ^ess it to be than evapora-
tions from it ?
2. It is observed, that in the sun's total eclipses, when
there is no part of his body discernible, yet there does not
always follow so great a darkness as might be expected
from his total absence. Now it is probable that the rea-
son is, because these thicker vapours being enlightened by
his heaps, do convey some light unto us, notwithstanding
the interposition of the moon betwixt his body and our
earth.
* Virga, Georg. I. 1. . f Metam. lib. 15.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 11
3. This likewise is by some guessed to be the reason of
the crepmculum^ or that light which we have before the
sun's rising.
Now if there be such evaporations from the sun, much
more ttien from the moon, which does consist of a more
gross and impure substance. The other arguments are
taken from several observations in the moon herself, and
do more directly tend to the proof of this proposition.
> 2. It is observed, that so much of the moon as is en-
lightened, is always part of a bigger circle tlian that which
is darker. The frequent experience of others hath proved
this, and an easy observation may quickly confirm it. But
now this cannot proceed from any other cause so probable
as from this orb of air ; especially when we consider how
that planet shining with a borrowed light, doth not send
forth any such rays as may make her appearance bigger
than her body.
3. When the moon being half enlightened, begins to
cover any star, if the star be towards the obscurer part,
then may it by the perspective be discerned to be nearer
unto the center of the moon than the outward circum-
ference of the enlightened part. But the moon being in
the full, then does it seem to receive these stars without
its limb.
4. Though the moon do sometime appear the first
day of her change^ when so much as appears enlightened
cannot be above the 80th part of her diameter, yet then
will the horns seem at least to be of a finger's breadth in
extension ; which could not be, unless the air about it
were illuminated.
5. It is observed in the solary eclipses, that there is
sometimes a great trepidation about the body of the moon,
from which we may likewise argue an atmosphaera, since
we cannot well conceive what so probable a cause there
should be of such an appearance as this, Stiod radii solares
a vaporibm lunam ambientibiLs fuerint intercisi^y that the '
* Scheiner Ros. Urs. 1. 4. part. 2. c. 27.
78 THAT TITE moon BIAY tt A WORLD.
sun-beams were broken and refracted by the vapours that
encompassed the moon.
6. I may add the like argument taken from another ob-
servation which will be easily tried and granted. When
the sun is eclipsed, we discern the moon as she is in her
own natural bigness ; but then she appears somewhat less
than when she is in the full, though she be in the same
place of her supposed excentrick and epicycle ; and there-
fore Tycho hath calculated a table for the diameter of the
divers new moons. But now there is no reason so pro-
bable to solve this appearance, as to place an orb of thicker
air near the body of that planet, which may be enlightened
by the reflected beams, and through which the direct rays
may easily penetrate.
But some may object, that this will not consist with that
which was before delivered, where I said, that the thinnest
parts had least light.
If this were true, how comes it to pass then that thi^
air should be as light as any of the other parts, when as it
is the thinnest of all ?
I answer, if the light be received by reflection only, then
the thickest body hath most, because it is best able to beat
back the rays ; but if the light be received by illumination
(especially if there be an opacous body behind, which may
double the beams by reflexion) as it is here, then I deny
not but a thin body may retain much light ; and perhaps
some of those appearances which we take for fiery cornets,
are nothing. else but a bright cloud enlightened; so that
probable it is there may be such air without the moon :
and hence it comes to pass, that the greater spots are only
visible towards her middle parts, and none near the cir-
cumference ; not but that there are some as well in those
parts as elsewhere, but they are not there perceiveable,
by reason of those brighter vapours which hide them.
THAT THP MOON MAY BE A WORLD. . 79
PROP. XL
That as their World is our Moon^ so our World is
their Moon.
I Have already handled the first thing that I promised,
according to the method which Aristotle uses in his
book De Mundo ; and shewed you the necessary parts
that belong to this world in the moon. In the next place
it is requisite that I proceed to those things which- are exr
trinsical^ unto it, as the seasons, the meteors, and the in«
habitants.
\. Of the seasons;
And if there be such a world in the moon, it is requisite
then that their seasons should be some way correspondent
unto ours, that they should have winter and summer,
night and day, as we have.
Now that in this planet there is some similitnde of win-
ter and summer, is afiirmed by Aristotle himself* ; since
there is one hemisphere that hath always heat and light
and the other that bath darkness and cold. True indeed,
their days and years are always of one and the same
length; (unless we make one of their years to be 19tof
ours, in which space all the stars do arise after the same
order.) But it is so with us also under the poles, and
therefore that great difference is not suf&cient to make it
altogether unlike ours ; nor can we expect that every thing ^
there should be in the same manner as it is here below,
as if nature had no way but one to bring about her pur-
poses. We have no reason then to think it necessary that
both these worlds should be altogether alike ; but it may
suffice if they be correspondent in something only. How-
ever, it may be questioned whether it doth not seem to be
against the wisdom of Providence, to make the night of so
^ Degen. anima. 1. 4. 12. f Golden number.
80 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
great a lengthy when they have such a long time unfit fof
work ? I answer, no ; since it is so, and more with us also
under the poles ; and besides, the general length of their
night is somewhat abated in the bigness of their moon,
which is our earth. For this returns as great a light unto
that planet, as it receives from it. But for the better proof
of this, I shall first free the way from such opinions a^
might otherwise hinder the speed of a clearer progress.
Plutarch, one of the chief patrons of this world in the
moon *, doth directly contradict this proposition ; affirm-
ing, that those who live there, may discern our world, as
the dregs and sediment of all other creatures ; appearing
to them through clouds and foggy mists, and that alto-
gether devoid of light, being base and unmoveable ; so
that they might well imagine the dark place of damnation
to be here situate, and that they only were the inhabiters
of the world, as being in the midst betwixt heaven and
hell.
To this I may answer, it is probable that Plutarch spake
this inconsiderately and without a reason ; which makes
him likewise fall into another absurdity, when he says our
earth would appear immoveable ; whereas questionless,
though it did not, yet would it seem to move, and theirs
to stand stilJ, as the land dotli to a man in a ship ; ac-
cording to that of the poet :
Provehimur poriu, terrteque, iirbcsque recedunt.
And I doubt not but that an ingenious author would easily
have recanted, if he had been but acquainted with those
experiences which men of later times have found out, for
the confirmation of this truth.
2. Unto him assents Macrobius, whose words are these ;
Terra accepto soils lumine clarescit tantummodoy non re^
lucet^. " Tl^e earth is by the sun-beams made bright,
" but not able to enlighten any thing so far." And his
reason is, because this being of a tliick and gross matter,
* Plut. de fac. lun.T, f Somm. Scip. 1. I.e. 19.
THAT THE MOON MAV BE A WORLD. 81
ihe light is terminated in its superficies, and cannot fifene-
trate into the substance ; whereas the moon doth there-
fore seem so bright to us, because it receives the beams
within itself. But the weakness of this assertion may be
easily maiiifcst by a common experience ; for polbhed
steel (whose opacity will not give any admittance to the
rays) reflects a stronger heat than glass, and so conse-
quently a greater light.
3. It is the general consent of philosophers, that the re->
flection of the sun-bcanis from the earth doth not reach
muth above half a m'lte high, Where they terminate the
fktst region ; so that to aflirm they ntight ascend to the
moon, were to say, tliere were but one region of air,
which contradicts the proved and received opinion;
Unto this H may be answered :
That it is indeed the Common consent, that the reflec-
iion of the sun beams reach only to the 'second region;
but yet some there are, and those too, philosophers of
good note, who thought otherwise. Thus Plotinus is
cited by Cslius, Si concipias te in suhlime qtwpiam mundi
I0CO9 Unde oculis subjiciatur terra moles aquis circumfusa^
li soils syderuvique radiis Ulustrafa^ nan aliam profecto
tnsam iri probdbile esU quam qualis modo visatur lunaris
globi species *. " If you conceive yourself to be in some
** such high place, where you might discern the whole
*^ globe of the earth and water, when it was enlightened
** by the sun's rays, it is probable it would then appear to
** you in the same shape as the moon doth now unto us."
So Paulus Foscarinus. Terra nihil aliud est quam altera
luna^ vel Stella^ talisque nobis apparerety si ex convenienti
elongatione eminus conspiciretur^ in ipsaque observari pos*
sent eadem aspectuum varietatesy qiae in Luna apparent t-
" The earth is nothing else but another moon or star, and
** would appear so unto us if it were beheld at a conve-
** nient distance, with the same changes and varieties as
«« there are in the moon." Thus also Carolus Malaper-
• Ant. lect. 1. 1, c. 4. t !» ep. ad Sebau. fimtonum.
V«L. X. -G
ft* THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORL».
tius, whose wotds dre these : Terra hac nostra^ si in lund
constituti essemus^ splendida prorsus quasi non ignobilis pld^
neta^ nobis appareret*. " If we were placed in the moon,
<* and from thence beheld this our earth, it would appear
*• unto us very bright, like one of the nobler planets." Unto
these doth Fromondus assent, when he says. Credo equi-
dem quod si oculus quispiam in drbe lunariforet^ globum
terra K aqua instar ingentis sydens ^ sole ilbistrem con^
spiceretf. " I believe that this globe of earth and water
** w&uld appear like some great star to any one, who
*< should look upon it from the moon/* Now this could
not be, nor could it shine so remarkably, unless the beams
of light were reflected from it. And therefore the same
/VoT/k^t^f expressly holds, that the first region of air is
there terminated, where the heat caused by reflection be-
gins to languish, whereas the beams themselves do pas«
a great way further. The chief argument which doth
most plainly manifest this truths is taken from a common
observation which may^be easily tried.
If you behold the moon a little before or after the con-
junction, when she is in a sextile with the sun, you may
discern not only the part which is enlightened, but the rest
also to have in it a kind of a duskish light ; but if you
chuse out such a situation, where some house or chim-
ney (being same seventy or eighty paces distaj^t from you)
may hide from your eye the enlightened horns, you m'ay
then discern a greater and more remarkable shining in those
parts unto whic^h the sun-beams cannot reach ; nay, there
is so great a light, that by the help of a good perspective
you may discern its spots. In so much that Blancanusthe
Jesuit speaking of it, says, H/ec experientia ita me ali-
quando fe/ellity ut in hunc fiilgorem casu )ac repente inci-
denSy existimarim iwvo quod^m viiraculo tempore a doles-
centis lume factum esse plenilunium J. " This experiment
♦* did once so deceive me, that happening upon the sight
«
* Praefat. ad Austriaca Syd. f Meteor. 1. I* c. 2. art. 2.
X De mundi/aj^. ,p. 3. c. 3. «
TilAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.' 8^
^ of this brightness upon a sudden, I thought that by Isome
** new nurade the moon had been got itito her full a little
" after her change."
But now this light is not proper to the modn ; it dottt
not proceed from the rays of the sun Which doth pene-
trate her body, nor is it caused by any other of the planctsr
and stars. Therefore it must hccefearily follow, that it
comes frdhi the earth. The ttto first of these I have al-
ready proved, and as for the last, it is confidently affirmed!
by Coelius, 2uod si in disquisitionem evocet qiiis^ an lunari
^yderi lUcem foerietent planeia item alii^ asseoerantur as^
truendum nonfcenerare"^. ** If any should ask whether the
'' other planets lend any light to the moon? I answer^
" they do not." True rrrdeed, the noble Tycho discus-
sing the reason 6f this light, attributes it to the planet Ve-
nus t ; and I grant that this may convey some light, to*
the moon; bUt that it is not the causd of^his whereof
we now discourse, is of itself sufficiently plain ;' because
Venus i^ sometimes over the moon, when as she cannot
convey any light to that part which is turned from her.
It doth' not proceed from the fixed stars \ for then it
would retain the same light in eclipses, whereas the light
at such times is more ri:iddy and dull. Then also the light
of the moon would not be greater or lesser, according ta
its distance from the edge of the earth's shadow, since it
did at all times equally participate this lighl of the stai*s.
In brief, this is neither proper to tlie moon, nor does it
j!)roceed from any penetration of the sun's rays, or the
shining of Venus, or the other planets, or the fixed stars.
]^ow because there is no other body in the whole universe,
$ave the earth, it remains that this light must necessarily
be caused by that, which with a just gratitude repays ta
the moon such illumination as it receives from her.
And as loving friends equally participate of the same
joy and grief, so do these mutually partake of the same
light from the sun, and the same darkness from the eclipses^
* Ant Lect. L 20, c. 5. t Pr«>gyni. 1.
G 2
W THAT TH£ MOON MAY BE A WORLB^*
being also severally helped by one anotlier in their greatest
wants: for when the moon is in conjunction vrith the sun^
and her upper part receives all the light, then her lower
hemisphere (which would otherwise be altogetlier dark) is
enlightened by the reflection of the sun-beains from tlie
earth. When these two planets are in opposition, then
that part of the earth which could not receive any light
from the sun-beams, is most enlightened by the moon,
being then in her full ; and as she doth most illuminate'
tlie earth when the sun-beams canitot, so the grateful
earth returns to her as great (nay greater) light when she
most wants it; so that always that visible part of the moon
which receives nothing from tlic sun, is enlightened by
the earth, as is proved by Galilxus, witlymany more ar-
guments, in that treatise which he calls Systema Mundi.
TVue indeed, when the moon comes to a quartile, then
y#0 can neither di3cern this light ; nor yet the darker parD
ef her body ; and that for a double reason ;
1 . Because the nearer it comes to the full, the less light
does it receive from the earth, whose illumination does aU
ways decrease in the same proportion as the moon does
increase.
2. Because of the exuberancy of the light in the other
parts. Sadppe Ulustratiim medium sptckm recipU valentio-
rem** The clearer brightness involves the weaker; it being
with the species of sight, as it is with those of sound ; and*
as the greater noise drowns the less, so the brighter object
hides that which is more obscure. But as they do always
in their mutual vicissitudes participate of one another's
* light : so also j^do they partake of the same defects and
darkenings ; for when our moon is eclipsed, tlien is their
isun- darkened ; and when our sun is eclipsed, then is their
moon deprived of its light, as you m«cy see afiirm<4 by
• Meslint* Quod si ternim noSis ex alia liccret intuerty i>.
quema4niodum deJiciinUem lunam ex longinquo spectart
passuwtiSy videre??ius tempore eclipsis solis^ terra aliquant
!'* ' * * Seal* exeic. 62. t Epit.A«tr.i;4.'part2^
THAT THE MOOK HAf BE A WOKID. SS
jNtrtem lumine solis dejicere, eodem plane mode sicut ex
opposite luna deficit. " If we might behold this globe of
*■' earth at the same distance as wcMo tlie moon in her
<* defect, we might discera some, part of It daricened in
" the sun's eclipses, just so as the moon is in hers."
Kor as our moon is eclipsed by the interposition of our
earth, so is their moon eclipsed by the interposition of
theirs. The manner of this mutual illumination betwixt
these two you may plainly discern in this £gure fol-
lowing.
,.?«"'%
Where A repreaents the suhi B ttie earth, and C the
njoon: Now suppose the moon C to be in a sextile of in-
crease, when there is only one small part of her body en-
lightened, then the earth £ will bare such a part of its ti*
■ibie hemisphere darkened, as is proportionable to that part
of the moOn which is enlightened ; and as for so much of
tb$ moon, as the sun-beams cannot reach unto, it le-
86 THAT THE M0017 MAY BE A WOULO.
ceives light from a proportionable part of the earth "whioH
ishines upon it, as you may plainly perceive by the
£gure.
You see then that agreement and similitude which
there is betwixt our earth and the moon. Now tlie
greatest difFerence which makes them unlike, is this, that
the moon enlightens our earth round* about, whereas our
earth gives light only to that hemisphere of the moon
Mfhich is visible unto us ; as may be certainly gathered
from the constant appearance of the same spots, which
could not thus come to pass, if the moon had such a diur-
nal motion about its own axis as perhaps our earth hath.
And though some suppose her to move in an epicycle,
yet this doth not so turn her bo^y round, that we may dis-
cern both hemispheres ; for according to that hypothesis
(say they) the motion of her eccentric doth turn her face
towards us, as much as the other doth from us.
But now, if any question what they do for a moon, who
live in the upper part of her body ? I answer. The solving
of this, is the most Uficj^rtain and difficult thing that I
know of, concerning this whole matter. But yet unto me
this seems a probable conjecture.
That the upper hemisphere of the moon doth receive a
sufficient light from those planets about it ; and amongst
these, Venus (it may be) bestows a more especial bright-r
ness, since Galilaeus hath plainly discerned that she suffers
the same increases and decreases, as the moon hath ; and
it i^ probable that this may be perceived there, without
the help of a glass, because they are far nearer it than wc.
When Venus (saith Keplar) lies down in the perige or
lower part of her supposed epicycle, then is she in con-
junction with her husband the sun ; from whom, after she
hath departed for the space of ten months, she gets plfinuvi
^terum. and is in the full.
But you will reply, though Venus may bestow some
light when she is over the moon, and in conjunction, yet
being in opposition, she is not visi|)l^ tp them, an^ wh^t
$haU they then do for light }
THAT THE MOON MAY fi£ A WORLD* S7
. I answer ; then they have none ; nor doth this make so
great a difference betwixt those two hemispheres, as there
is with us betwixt the places under the poles and the line.
And besides, it is considerable that there are two kind of
planets.
1. Primary; such whose proper circle do encompass
the body of the Siin, whereof there are six ; Saturn, Ju-
piter, Mars, Ceres or the Earth, Venus, Mercury. As
in the frontispiece.
2. Secondary ; such whose proper circles are not about
the sun, but some of the other primary planets.. Thus are
there two about Saturn, four about Jupiter, and thus like-
wise does the moon encompass our earth* Now it is pro-
bable that these lesser secondary planets, are not so ac-
commodated with all conveniencies of habitation, as the
others that are more principal.
But it may seem a very difficult thing to conceive, how
so gross and dark a body as our earth, should yield such a
clear light as proceeds from the moon ; and therefore the
Cardinal de Cusa^ (who thinks every star to be a several
world) is of opinion, that the light of the sun is not able
to make them appear so bright ; but the reason of their
shining is, because we behold them at a great distance
through their regions of fire, which do set a shining lustre
upon those bodies that of themselves are dark. Unde si
quis esset extra regionem ignis^ terra ista in circumfefen-
tia sua regionis per mtdiuin ignis hicida stella appareret.
^' So that if a man were beyond the region of fire, this
" earth would appear through that as a bright star." But
if this were the only reason, then would the moon be
freed from such increases and decreases, as she is npw
liable unto.
Keplar thinks that our earth receives that light whereby
it shines, from the sun ; but this (saith he) is not such zx\
intended clear brightness as the moon is capable of, and
therefore he guesses that the earth there is of a moi^Q
• 4?^ jJocfe ig. 1, 2, c. 12^
Iff TfTA'T i^HE VO<>N MAY 6E A WORLD.
&msky soil, like fhc isle of Crptc, and so is better a>le tp
jSflcct a sfrongcr light ; whereas our earth must supply
this intention with the quantity of its body. Put this I
i^onceive to be a needless conjecture, since our earth (if all
things were well considered) will bQ found able enough to
refliect as great a light. For,
1 . Consider its 'opacity ; if you mark these sublunary
things, you shall perceive that ^mongst them, those that
are most perspicuous, are not so well able to reverberate
fhe sun-BfeahiS, as tlje thicker bodies. The rays pass singly
dirough a diaphanous matter, but in an opacous substance
Ihey are doubled in their return, and multiplied by reflec-
tion. Now if the moon and tlie other planets can shine
so ctearly by beating back the ' sun-beam^, why may not
itit earth aiso shine as welK whkh agriees ¥^ith them in
the cause of this brightness, their opacity?
2. Consider what a clear light we may discern reflected
firom the caith in the midst of summer; and \Vithal, con-
ceive how much greater that must be v^hich is under the
lind. Where the rays are more directly and strongly rever*
berated.
3. It is considerable, that though the moon does in
tlie night-time seem to be of so cleat a brightness, yet
yrhtn we look upon it i(\ the day, it appears like some
httle whitish cloud: not but that at both times, she is of
ah equal light in herself. The reason of this difference
|s, because in the night We look upon it through a dark
and obscure medium, there being no other enlightened
"ftody, whose brightness may abate from this : whereas in
the day-time, the whole heavens round about it are of an
tqud] clearness, and so make it to appear with a weaker
light. Now because we cannot see how the enlightened
parts of our earth do look in the night, the/efore in com-j
piling it with the moon, we cnust not consider her, as
she is beheld t^irough the advantage of a dark medium,
Tfiut as she iecms in the day-time. Now in any clear sun-
l^bipe day, our earth does appear as bright as the moon,
i/vhich at the 3ame time does s^em like some duskish clou^
f^AT tH% IHOON MAY BC A WORlp^ 99
V.
(^ any little observatjion may easily manifest.) Therc^#
fore we need not doubt but that the earth is as well able IQ '
give light as the moon. To this it may be added, that
tho^ very clouds, which |n the jday-timc seem to be of ax^
equal light to the moon, do in the evening become as dark
as our earth ; and as for those of them which are looked
upon at any great distance, they are often mistaken for
the mountains.
4. It i§ considerable, that though thie moon seem to be
of so great a brightness in the night, by reason of its near-
ness onto those several shadows which it casts, yet is it of
itself weaker than that part of twilight, which usually we
haye for half an hour after sun-set, because we cannot til!
after that time discern any shadow to be made by it.
5. Consider the great distance at which we behold the
planets, for this must needs add much to their sl^ining; and
therefore Cusanus (in the above-cited place) thinks that if
a man were in the sun, that planet would not appear so
bright to him, as now it doth to us, because then his eye
could discern but little ; whereas here, we may compre-
hend the beams as they are contracted in a narrow body.
Keplar beholding the earth from a high mountain, when it
waw enlightened by the sun, confesses that it appeared un-
to him of an incredible brightness, whereas tlien he could
pnly see some small parts of it ; but how much brighter
(yould it have appeared, if he might in a direct line behold
the whole globe of earth and these rays gathered together?
So that if we consider that great light which the earth re-
ceives from the sun in the summer, and then suppose we
were in the moon, where w^e ipight see the whole earth
hanging in those vast spaces, where there is nothing to
terminate the sight, but those beams which are there con*
tracted into a Jittle compass ; I say, if we do well con-
sider this, we may easily conceive that our earth appears
9S bright to those other inhabitants in the moon, as theirs '
doth to us.
But here it may be objected, that with us for many
iisLys in the y^ar, tbsi heavens |ire so overclouded, that we
, I
90 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
pannot see the $un at alt ; and for the most part, in our
brightest days, there are many scattered clouds which
^ade thQ earth in sundry places : so that in this respect, it
must needs be unlike the moon^ and will not be able to
yield so clear, uninteroiitted a light» as it receives froipi
that planet.
To tliis I answer.
1. As for those lesser brighter clouds, which for the
J^ fnost part are scattered up and down in the clearest days,
these can be no reason why our earth should be of a darker
appearance, bepause these clouds being near unto the
earth, and so not distinguishable ^t so great a distance from
it]; and likewise being illuminated on their back parts by
the sun that shines upon them, must seem as bright to
those in the moon, as if the beams were immediately re-
flected from our earth.
2. When these clouds that are interposed, are of any
)arge extension, or great opacity, zs it is in extraordinary
lasting and great rains, then there must be some dis-
cernible alteration in (he light of our earth : but yet this
does not make it to differ from the moon, since it is so
also with that planet, as is shewed in the latter part of tb^
ixext chapter.
PROP. XIL
TTiat it is probable there may be such meteors belonging
to that world in thfMoon^ as titer e are with tcs.
PLUTARCH discussing on this point, affirms that it is
not necessary there should be the same means of
growth and fructifying in both these worlds, since nature
might in her policy find out more ways than one how tq
bring about the same effect. But however, he thinks it is
probable that the moon herself sendeth forth warm wipds;
and by the swiftness of her motion, thf;re should b^e^tlie
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A lyCRLD. 91
4).ut a sweet and pomfortable air, pleasant dews, and gentle
fpoisture, which might serve fpr refreshing and nourish-
ment of the inhabitants and plants in that other world.
But since they have all things alike with us, as sea and
land, and vaporous air encprnpassing both ; I should rather
therefore think, that nature there should use the same way
•pf producing meteors as she doth with us; and not by a
motion, (as Plutarch supposes) because she doth not love
to vary from hei' usual operations without some e:!^traor-
dinary impediment, but still ]^eeps her beat<en path, luiless
«he be driven thence.
One ai:gument whereby I shall manifest this trpth, may
be taken from those new stars which have appeared in di-
vers ages of the world, and by their parajax have been dis-
cerned to have been above the moon ; such as was that in
Cassiopeia, that in Sagittarius, witii m^ny others betwixt
the planets. Hipparchus* in his time took especial no-
tice of such as these, and therefore fancied out such con^
stellations in which to place the star$, shewing how many
there were in every asterism ; that so afterwards, posterity
might know whether ^there were any new star produced,
or ^ny old one missing. Now the nature of these comets
^ay. probably manifest, that in this other world there are
other meteors also ; for these in all likelihood, are nothing
/else but such evaporations caused by the sun from the bo^
dies of the plai|ets. I shall prove this by shewing tlie im-
probabilities an4 inconveniences of any other opinion.
For the better pursuit of this, it is in the first place re^
quisite, that I deal with our chief adversary, Csesar la Galla,
who doth most directly oppose that truth which is here to
be proved. He endeavouring to confinn the incorrupti-
bility of the heavens, and being there to satisfy the argu-
ment which is taken frqm these comets; he answers it
thus: Atti argumentum desumptum ex paralaariy non est
efficaXf ant si est ejficax^ ^orum insfruvientonnn usum de--
j^ipere^ vtl ratiane astri^ vel mediit vel di^tanti^t au( erg0
* Piili. Nat. Hi»t. 1. 2. c. S6.
9^ THAir THE MOON MAY BZ A WORLD,
erai in ^vpi^ema parte aeris, aut si in coeloy tiimforsanfacw
turn evdt ex reflexione radiorum Saturni H Jovis^ qui tutu:
in conjunctjone fueranL " Either the argument from the
•* paralax is not efficacious, or if it be, yet the use of the
instruments might deceive, either in regard of the star,
or the medium, or the distance, and so this comet
*< jnight be in the upper regions of the air ; or if it were
f^ in the heavens, there it might be produced by the re-
** flection of the rays from Saturn and Jupiter, who wepe
*' then in conjunction." You see what shifts he is driven
to, how he runs up ^nd down to many starting holes that
he may find soipe shelter ; and instead of the strength of
reason, he answers with a multitude of words, thinking (as
the proverb is) that he may use hail when he hath no
thunder. Nihil turpius (saith Sepeca *) dukio K incerto,
pedem moifo feferente^ modo producenie. " Wb^^ can
^* there be more unseemly in one tl^at should be a fair
*• disputaifit, than to be now here, now there, and so un-
♦* certain, that one cannot tell where to find him ?" He
thinks that the^e are qot comets in the heavens, because
there may be many other reasons of such appearances ;
but what he knows not: perhaps (he saysf) that argu-
ment from the paralax is not sufficient ; or if it be, then
there may be spme deceit in the observation. To this I
may safely say, thi^ he may justly b^ accounted a weai^
niathematician, who mistrusts the strength of this argu*
ment ; not caA he know much in astronomy, who underr
stands not the paralax, which is a foundation of that
science : and I am sure that he is a timorous man, who
dares not believe the frequent experience of hi? senses, or
trudt to a demonstration.
True indeed, I grant it is possible that the eye, the me-
dium, and the distance, may all deceive the behcjder ; but
1 would have him shew whjich of all these was. Kkely to
cause an error in this ob^rvation? Merely to say they
tnight be deceived, is no sufficient answer; for.by thi^ I
* Epist; 95. t Vide G&lilaeum iqi^iiundi, Cojioq. 3,.
.-fc
THAt THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. *?
might confute the positions of all astronomers, and affiriti
the stars are hard by us, because it is possible they might
be deceived in their observing distaiK:e. But I forbear any
further reply : my opinion is of that treatise, that either it
was set forth purposely to tempt a confutation, that he
might see the opinion of Galilseus confirmed by othefs ;
or else it was invented with as much haste and negligence
as it was printed, there being in It almost as many faults
as lines.
Others think that these are not any new cornels, but
Some ancient stars that were - there bfefore, whichf now
shine with tliat unusual brightness, by reason of the itiicr-*
position of such vapours, which do multiply their light ;
and so the alteration will be here only, and m>i in the
heavens. Thus Aristotle thought the appearance of th^
milky way was produced: for he held that there were
many little stai*s, Which by their influence did constantly
attract such a vapour towards that place of heaven, so
that it always appeared white. Now by the same reason
may a brighter vapour be the cause of these appear-
ances.
But how probable soever this opinion may seem, yet if
well considei^ed, you shall find it to be altogether absurd
aod impossible : for,
1 . These stars were never seen there before ; and it iff
not likely that a vapour being hard by us, cas so multiply
that light which could not before be at all discerned.
2. This supposed vapour cannot be either contracted
into a narrow compass, or dilated into a broad. 1. $t
could ni^t be within a little space^ for then that star would
not appear with the same multiplied light to those in other
dimates. 2. It cannot be a dilated vapour, for then other
stars which were discerned through the same vapour, would
seem as big as that. This argument is the same in effect
with that of the paralax, as you may sec in this figure.
>
J* • • • %
• J
941 TRAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
Suppose A B tohta hemisphere of one eaith, G D to
be the Ufiper part of the highest region, in which thfirtJ
m^ht be either a contracted vapour, as G, or else a dilated
one, as If I. Suppose E F likewise to represent half the
heavens, wherein was this appearing comet at K. Now'
I say, that a contracted vapour, as G, coutd not cause this
appearance, because an inhabitant af M could not discern
the same star with this brightness, but perhaps another at
L, betwixt which tlie vapour is directly interposed. Nor
could it be caused by a dilated vapour, as H I, because then
all the stars that were discerned through it, would be per-
ceived with the same brightness.
It is necessary therefore that the cause of tliis appearance
should be in the heavens. And this is granted by th£
most and best astronomers, fiut, say some, this doth not
argue any natural alteration in those purer bodies, since it
is probable that the concourse of many* little vagabond
stars, by the union of their beams may cause so great i
light. Of this opinion Were Anaxagoras and Zeno amongst
the ancient, and Baptista Cisatus, Blancanus, with otb'eri
amongst our modern astronomers. For, say they, whea
there happens to be a concourse of some few stars, then
do many other fly unto them from all the parts of heaven
like so many bees unto their king. But t. It is not likely
that aaigiigst those which we count the £xed stars, there
Taxr THE Mooir may be a worlit. SB
l&hould be any such uncertain motions, that they can wai^r
from all parts of the heavens, as if nature had negle4l|d
them, or forgot to appoint them a determinate coiiise,
2. If there be such a conflux of these, as of bees to theit
king, then what reason is there that they do not still tarry
with it, that so the comet may not be dissolved? But
enough of this. You may commonly see it confuted by
many other arguments. Others there are, who affirmi
these to be some new created stars, produced by an extra-
ordinary supernatural power*. I answer, true indeed, it is
possible they might be so, but however it is not likely
they were so, since such appearances may be solved some
other way ; wherefore to fly unto a mu'acle for such things,
were a great injury to nature, and to derogate from her
skill; an indignity much misbecoming a man who pro-
fesses himself to be a philosopher. Miraculum (saith one)
est ignorantiiff asylum ; a miracle often serves for the re-
ceptacle of a lazy ignorance ^ which any industrious spirit
would be ashamed of ; it being but an idle way to shift ofF
the labour of any further search. But here is the misery
of it, we first tie ourselves unto Aristotle's principles, and
then conclude that nothing could contradict them but a
miracle ; whereas it would be much better for the com-
monwealth of learning, if we would ground our principles
rather upon the frequent experiences of our own, than
the bare authority of others.
Some there are who think that these comets are nothing
«lse but exhalations &om our earth f, carried up into the
higher parts of the heaven. So Peno, Rothmannus and
Galilaeus. But this is not possible, since by computation
it is found, that one of them is above 300 times bigger
than the whole globe of land and water. Others there-
fore have thought tliat they did proceed from the body of
the sun, and that that planet only is annetarum officina^
unde tanqiLam emissarii fiC exploratores eniitierentur, brevt
ad solem rediturU the shop or forge of comets, from
• Ciavius in spliaaram, cap. K. + Tycho Progym. 1. c. ^.
I*
f'
96 XBAV THE M06N MAY BE A WOTlttD.
•
Whence tbcy were sent, like so many spies, that tbey
Sdight in some short space ret^^rn again. But this cannot
be^ince if so much matter bad proceeded from him aloney
it would .bsive made a sensible diminution iti his body.
The iidbie Tycho therefore thJinks that they consist of
. sooM^liDcb'fluider parts of the heaven, as the milky way is
framed of, which being coflndensed together, yet not attain-
ing to the consistency o{ a star, is in some space of time
rariiied again into its wpnted nature.' J3ut this is not likely,
because the appearance of the milky way 'does fiOt arise'
from ^ome fluider part^ of the heaven (as he supposes)
but firom the light of nuiny lesser stars which are there-
abouts*. And therefore it is usually thus described: f^ia
lacteq rtihUaliud est quam irmumerabilis stellarum Jixai^m
gregesi fui eonfuso K pallenti lumme tractum ilium inaU
banL The milky way is nothing else but the pale ai>c^
confused light of many lesser stains, whereby Some parts
of the heaven are made to appear white.
And beside^ what likely caiise Can we conceive of this
eondensatiouy unless there be such. qualities there, as there
■ ■ are in our air, and then why may not the planets have the
like qiialities as our earth ? And if so, then it is more pro-
bable that they are made by the ordinary way of nature,^
aS they are whh us, and consist of such exhalations from
the bodies of the planets, as heing very much farified,
may be drawn up through the orb of gross vaporous air
that encompasses them. Nor is this a singular opinion ;
but it seemed most likely to Camillus Gloriosas, Th. Cam-
panella, Fromondus, with some others f. But if you. ask,
whither shall ail these exhalations return ? I answer, every
one into his own planet. If it be again objected, that tbea
there will be so many centers of gravity, and each several
planet will be a distinct world : 1 reply, we have not like
probability concerning the rest ; but yet perhaps ail of
them arc so, except the sun, though Cusanus and some
* Pcotnond. Meteor. 1. 2. c. 5. art. 2. Item Vesta, tract. 5. c. 2.
t De Comet. I. 5. c. 4. Apol. pro. Galii* Meteor. 1.3. c; 2. art. &
TtfAT tHE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 9?
Others, think there is one also ; and. later times Jiaye ' dis*
covered some lesser clouds moving round aboutiiim*. But
ias for Saturn, he. hath two moons on each side. Jupiter
hath four, that encircle hi;n with their motion ; which are
likewise eclipsed by the interposition of his body, as the
moon is by out earth. Venus is observed to increase and
decrease as the moon. And this perhaps hath been noted
by former ages, as may be guessed by that relation of St.
Austin out of Varrof. Mars, and all the rest, derive their
light from the sun. Concerning Mercury, there hath been
little or no observation, because, for the most part, he lies
hid under the sun-beams, and seldom appears by himself.
But when he does, yet the compass of his body is so^ittle,
and his light of s^o clear a brightness, by reason of his
nearness to the. sun, th^^the perspectiye cannot make the
same discoveries upon him, as from the rest.
So that if youconsider their quantity, tlieir opacity, or these
other discoveries, you shall find it probable enough, that .
each of them may be a several world. Especially since
every one of them is allotted to a several orb, and not al-
together in one, as the fixed stars seem to be. But this
would be too much for to vent at the first : the chief thing ..
at which I now aim in this discourse, is to prove that thero
may be one in the moon.
It hath been before confirmed, that there was a sphere
of thick vaporous air encompassing the moon, as the first
and second regions do this earth. I have now shewed,
that thence such exhalations may proceed as do produce
the comets : now. from hence it may probably follow,
that there may be wind also and rain, with such other me-
teors as are common amongst us. This consequence is so
dependant, that Fromondus dares not deny it, though he
would (as he confesses himself J ;) for if the sun be able to
exhale from them such fumes as may cause comets, why
not then such as may cause winds, and why not such also
* Lactant. Inst. 1. 3. c. 23. f ^^ Civit. Dei, 1. 21. c. 8.
t De Meteor. 1. 3. c. 2. art. 6.
VOL. I. H '
':-^
68 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLI);
as may cause raiii, since I have above shewed, that there
is sea and land, as with us } Now rain seems to be more
especially requisite for them, since it may allay the heat
and soorchings of the sun when he is over their heads.
And nature hath thus provided for those in Peru, with the
oUicr inhabitants under the line.
But if there be such great and frequent alterations ki the
heavens, why cannot we disctrn them ?
I answer :
1. There may be such, and we not able to perceive;
them, because of the weakness of our eye, and the dis*
lance of those places from us ; they are thd words of Fie-
nus (fts they are quoted by Fromondus in the above-Cited
place) Possunt maxima permutationes in ccelojieriy etiamsi
a nobis non conspiciantur ; hoc vistts nostn debilitas b( tm-*
mensa casli distantia faciunt. And unto him assents Fro-
mondus himself, when a little after he says, Si in spharis
planetarum dcgereviusj plurima for^an ccslestium nebula-^
rum vellera toto athere passim dispefsa videremuSf qtwrutn
species jam evanescit nimia spatii intercapedine. " If we
•* did live in the spheres of the planets, we might there
** perhaps discern many great clouds dispersed through
*^ tlie whole heavens, which are not now visible by reason
*' of this great distance.
2. Majslin and Keplar affirm, that they have seen some
of these alterations. The words of Maeslin are these (as I
find them cited.) In eclipsi lunari vespere dominicst
pabnanim anni 1605, in cor pore lume versus boream^
nigricans quadam macula conspecta fuity obscurior catero
loto corporCy quod candentis ferrijiguram reprasentabat ;
dixisses nubila in multam regionem extensa pluviis if tem^
pestuosis imbribus gravida^ cujusmodi ab excelsomm mon-*
fium jugis in humlliora convallium loca videre non raro
contingit^. " In that lunary eclipse which happened id
the even of Paltti^Sunday, in the year 1605, there was a
certain blackish spot discerned in the northerly part of
* Dissert, 2. cum nunc. Calil. item Somn. Astron. nota ulti^iau
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLX>. 99
'* the moon, being darker than any other place of her
^ I
ii
body, and representing the colour of red hot iron ; you
might conjecture that it was some dilated cloud, being
pregnant with showers ; for thus do such lower clouds
appear from the tops of high mountains."
And a little before this passage, the same author speak*
ihg of that vaporous air about the moon, tells us ; 2uod
tircumfium ille splendor diversis temporibus apparet /im-
pidior plus minusrve. That it does at divers times appear
of a different clearness, sometimes more, and sometimes
less : which he guesseis to arise frorj the clouds and va-
pours that arc in it.
Unto this I niay add another testimony of Bapt. Cisatus,
as he is quoted by Niercmbergius, grounded upon an ob-
servation taken 23 years after this of Maeslin, and writ to
this Euseb. Nieremberg. in a letter by that diligent and
Judicious astronomer. The words of it run tlius ; Et qui»
dam in eclipsi nupera solaria quafuit ipso die naiali Christij
observavi dare in luha soli siipposita^ quidpiam quod vald&
probat id ipsum quod cometa quoque H mdcula solares ur^^
gent, neynpe caelum non esse a tenuilaie K variationibus
aeris exemptum ; nam circa lunarn adverii esse spharam
seu orbem quendam vaporosuniy non secus aique circum ter--
rami adeoqiie sicut ex terra iii aliquam usque spharam va*
pores Sf exhahtiones expirant, ita queque ex luna*. " In
" that iate solary eclipse which happened on Christmas-
** day, when the moon was just under the sun, I plainly
** discerned that in her which may clearly confirm what
** the comet's and sun's spots do seem to prove, viz. That
** the heavens are not so solid, nor freed from tliose
*' changes which our air is liable unto; for about the
** moon 1 perceived such an orb, or vaporous air as that is
** which doth encompass our earth ; and as vapours and
'^ exhalations are raised from our eartli into this air, so aie
" they also from the moon." ^^
* Hlitor. jsat. I. 2. c* 1 1.
H 2
•* *
100 THAT THE MOOK MAY BE A WORLD.
You see what probable grounds, and plain testimonies
I have brought for the confirmation of this proposition :
many other things in this behalf might be spoken, which
for brevity sake I now omit, and pass unto the next
PROP. xin.
That it IS probable there may be inhabitants in this other
world i but of what kind they are^ is uncertain.
I Have already handled the seasons, and meteors belong*
ing to this new world : it is requisite that in the next
place I should come unto the third thing which I pro-^
mised, and say somewhat of the inhabitants : concerning
whom there might be many difficult questions raised ; as,
whether that place be more inconvenient for habitation
than our world (as Keplar thinks) ; whether they are the
seed of Adam ; whether they are there in a blessed estate,
or else what means there may be for their salvation? With
many other such uncertain enquiries, which I shall wil*
lingly omit; leaving it to their examination who have
more leisure and learning for the search of such parti*
culars.
Being for mine own part content only to set down such
notes belonging unto these, which I have observed in other
writers. Cum tota ilia regio nobis ignota sit, remanent
inhabitatores illi ignoti penitus (saith Cusanus * ;) since
we know not the regions of that place, we must be alto«.
gether ignorant of the inhabitants. There hath not yet
been any such discovery concerning these, upon which we
may buUd a certainty, or good probability : well may we
* Dedoct.ignorantia, LS. c. 1?»
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. ^0^
guess at them, and that too very doubtfully, but we can
know nothing ; for, if we do hardly guess aright at things
which be upon earth, if with labour we do find the things
that are at hand, how then can we search out those things
that are in heaven*? What a little is that which, we
know, in respect of those many matters contained withia
this great universe f This whole globe of earth and water,
though it seem to us to be of a large extent, yet it bears
liot so great a proportion unto the whole frame ' of nature^
as a small sand doth unto it ; and what can such little crea-
tures as we discern, who are tied to this point of earth i
or what can they in the moon know of us ? If w^ underr
stand any thing (saith flsdras f) it is nothing but that which
is upon the earth ; and he that dwelleth above in the hea-
vens, may only understand the things that are above in the
height of the heavens.
So that it were a very needless thing for us to search
after any particulars ; however, we may guess in the gene-
ral that there are some inhabitants in that planet : for why
else did providence furnish that place with all such conve-
i}ierices of habitation as have been above declared ?
But you will say, perhaps, is there not too great and in**
tolerable a heat, since the sun is in their zenith every
month, and doth tarry there so long before he leaves it ?
I answer, 1. This may, perhaps, be remedied (as it Is
under the line (by the frequency of mid-day showers,
which may cloud their sun, and cool their earth.
2. The equality of their nights doth much temper the
scorching of the day ; and the extreme cold that comes
from the one, requires some space before it can be dis-v
pelled by the other; so that the heat spending a great
while before it can have the victory, hath not afterwards
much time to rage in. Wherefore notwitiistanding this
doubt, yet that place may remain habitable. And this
was the opinion of the Cardinal de Cusa, when speaking
of this planet, he says, Uk locics mundi est habitatio ho^
• Wiad.ix. 16. t SEsd.iv.SI.
102 THAT THE MODK MAY BE A WORLD.
minum K ammalium atque vegetabUium ♦. " This part of
•* tlic world is inhabited by men, and beast, and plants.''
To him assented Campanella ; but he cannot determine
vrhether they were men or rather some other kind of
creatures. If they were men, then he thinks they could
not be infected with Adam's sin ; yet, perhaps, they had
some of their own, which might make Ihem liable to the
same misery with us ; out of which, \i may be, they were
deJivcred by the same means as we, the death of Christ ;
and thus he thinks that place of the Ephesians may be in*
. terpreted, where the Apostle says, God gathered all things
together in Christ, both which are in earth, and which are
in the heavens f. Su also that of the same Apostle to the
Colossians, where he says, that it pleased the father to re-
concile all things into himself by Christ, whether they be
things in earth, or things in heaven J.
But 1 dare not jest with divine truths, or apply these
places according as fancy directs. As I think this opinion
doth n<** any where contradict scripture ; so I think like-
wise, that ii cannot be proved from it. Wherefore Cam-
' panciia's second conjecture may be more probable, that
tlie inhabitants of that world are not men as we are ; but
some other kinU of crcaturci» which bear some proportion
and likeness to our natures. Or it mai be, they are of a
quite different nature from any thing ht^re below, such as
no imagination can describe ; our understandings being ca-
pable only of such things as have entered by our senses,
or else such mixed natures as may be composed from them.
Kow, there may be many other species of creatures be-
side those that are already known in the world ; there is a
great cha:i:^ betwixt the nature of men and angels: it may
be the inhabitants of llie planers are of a middle nature be*
tween both these. It is not improbable that God might
create some of all kinds, that so he might more com-
pletely glorify himself in the works gf his ppWer and
wisdom.
* D^» doct. ign. 1. 2. cap. 12. f Ephes. i. 10. J Col. i. 20.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 103
Cusauus too, thinks they difFer from us in many respects ;
I will set down his words as they may be found in the
above-cited place, Suspicamur in regione solis magis esse
splares, claros K illuminatos intdleciuales habitafort^Sy spi^
rititalipres etiam quam in luna^ ubi mogis Itinaticiy &" in
terra magis 7?iAterialts H crassij nt illi intelleetqalis Tiafur
ra solares sint mulfum in acta SC parum in potential ter--
reni vero magis in potential Sf parmn in actUy lunares in
medio fluctuantes. Hoc quidem opinamur ex iiifluentia
ignili solisy aquatica simul H aerea lume iC gravedint ma*
ieriali teme^ K consimiliter de aliis stellarum, regionibuSf^
suspicantes nullam habitationibus. careiy, quasi, tot sint pav
its pc^rticulares mundiales vnius ujiiv^rsiy quot sunt stellip
quarMm, no7i est ifnum^rus^ nisi apud ewn ^ui omnia in nU"
mero creavit.
" W« nsiay conjecture (saith he) the inhabitants of the
♦> sun are Uke to the qat^re of that planet, nfiore clear and
*' bright, more intellectual than those in the moon, where
** tliey are nearer to the nature of that duller planet, and
" those of the earth being more gross and material than
<* either ; so that these intellectual natures in the sun, are
*^ more form than matter, those in the earth more matter
<• than form, and those in the moon betwixt both. Tfajs
" we may guess from the fiery influence of the sun, the
** watefy and aereous influence of the moon, as al^fQ the
** material heaviness of the earth. In sun'*e such mi^na^
«
** likewise is it with the regions of thg other «tars ; for
** we conjecture that none of them are w^thoitf iuhabi-
*' tants, but that there are so many particular worlds and
" parts of this one univ^se, as there are stars^ which are
** innumerable^ unless it be to^liim who created all things
** in number."
For he held tliat the stars were not all in one equal orb
as wc commonly suppose ; but chat some were far higher
than others, which made- them appear less ; aad that many
others wer^ so far above 4ny of these, tUat they were alto-
gether invisible unto us. An oj)in.iQn which (as I con-
•i«
104 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
ccive) hath not any great probability for itj nor certainty
against it.
The priest of Saturn relating to Plutarch (as he feigns
it) the nature of these Selenites, told him they were of di-
vers dispositions, some desiring to live in the lower parts
of the moon, where they might look downwards upon us,
while others were more surely mounted aloft, all of them
shining like the rays of the sun, and as being victorious, are
crowned with garlands made with the wings of Eustathia
or Constancy.
It hath been the opinion amongst some of the ancients,
that their heavens and Elysian fields were in the moon,
where the air is most quiet and pure. Thus Socrates, thus
Plato*, with his followers, did esteem this to be the place
where those purer souls inhabit, who are freed from the
sepulchre, and contagion of the body. And by the fable
of Ceres, continually wandering in search of her daughter
Proserpina, is meant nothing else but the longing desire
of men, who live upon Ceres, earth, to attain a place in
Proserpina, the moon or heaven.
Plutarch also seems to assent unto this ; but he thinks
moreover, that there are two places of happiness answer-
able to two parts, which he faAcies to remain of a man
when he is dead, the soul and the understanding; the soul he
thinks is made of the moon ; and as our bodies do so pro-
ceed from the dust of this earth, that they shall return to it
hereafter ; so our souls were generated put of that planet,
and shall be resolved into it again ; whereas the under-
standing shall ascend unto the sun, out of which it was
made ; where it shall possess an eternity of well-^being,
and far greater happiness than that which is enjoyed in the
moon. So that when a man dies, if his soul be much pol-
luted, then must it wander up and down in the middle re-
gion of the air where hell is, and there suffer unspeakable
torments for those sins whereof it is guilty. Whereas the
souls of better men, when they have in some space of time
* Nat. (^om. 1. 3. c. 19.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD, 105
been purged from' that impurity which they did derive
from the body, then do they return into the mooa, where
they are possest with such joy, as those men feel who
profess holy mysteries ; firom which place (saith he) some
are sent down to have the superintendance of oracles,
being diligent either in the preservation of the good, either
from, or in, all perils, and the prevention or punishment
of all wicked actions ; but if in these employments they
misbehave themselves, then are they again to be impri-
soned in a body, otherwise they remain in the moon, till
their souls be resolved into it, and the understanding being
cleared from all impediments, ascends to the sun, which is
its proper place. But this requires a diverse space of time,
according to the divers affections of the soul. As for those
who have been retired and honest, addicting themselves to
a studious and quiet life, these are quickly preferred to a
higher happiness. But as for such who have busied them-
selves in many broils, or have been vehement in the prose-
cution of any lust, as the ambitious, the amorous, the
wrathful man, these still retain the glimpses and dreams of
such things as they have performed in their bodies, which
make them either altogether unfit to remain there, where
they are, or else keeps them long ere they can put pfF
their souls. Thus you see Plutarch's opinion concerning
the inhabitants and neighbours of the moon, which (ac-
cording to the manner of the Academics) he delivers in a
third person ; you see he makes that planet an inferior
kind of heaven ; and though he differs in many circum-
stances, yet doth he describe it to be some such place, as
we suppose Paradise to be. You see likewise his opinion
concerning the place of the damned spirits, that it is in
the middle region of the air ; and in neither of these is he
singular, but some more late and orthodox writers have
agreed with him. As for the place of hell, many think it
may be in the air, as well as any where else.
True indeed, St. Austin affirms*, that this place cannot
be discovered; but others there are who can shew the si-
♦ De Civit. Dei, 1. 22, c. 16. .
306 THAT THE MOON MAY HE A WORLD.
tuation of it out of scripture ; soiue {molding it to b© in
another world without this, because our Saviour calls it
cKOTog sicare^v *, outward darkness. But the mpst will
have it placed towards the center of our earth, because it
js said, Christ descended into the lower parts of the eartk ;
and some of these are so confident that this Is its situation,
tliat they can describe you its bigness also, and of what
capacity it is. Francis (libera in his comment on the Reve-
lations, speaking of those words, where it is said, that the
blood went out of the wine-press, even unto the horses
bridles, by the space of one thousand and six hundred ftir^
longs t» interprets them to be meant of h^ll^ j^nd that that
number expifesses the diameter of its concavity, which i?
200 Italian miles. ButLessiusJ thinks that this opinion
gives them too much room in hell, and therefore he
guesses that it is not so wide ; for, saith he, the diameter
pf one league being cubically multiplied, will make a sphere
capable of 800000 millions of damned bodies, allowing to
e^ch six foot in the square i whereas, says he, it is certain,
that there sl\all not be one hundred thousand millions in
^11 that shall be damned. You see the bold Jesuit was
careful that every one should have but room enough in
hell ; and by the strangeness of the conjecture, you may
guess that he Jxad ^^ather be absurd^^ than seem either un-
charitable or ignorant. I remcinbcr there is. a relation in
Pliny, how that Dionysiodorus a mathemal;igian„ being
^ead, did send a letter from this place to some of his
friends upon earth, to certify them what distance there
was betwixt the center and s.uperficies : he might have
done well to have prevented this controversy, and informed
them the utmost capacity of that place. However, certain
it is, that that number cannot be known ; and probable it
is, tliat the place is not yet determined, but that hell is
there where there is any totmented soul, which may
be4n the regions of the air, as well as in the center ; and
* Mat. XXV. 30. Eph. IV. 9. t Rcv.xiv.^O.
J De morib. div. 1, IJ. c 24,
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLO. 101
therefore perhaps it is, that tlie devil is stiled the prince of
the air. But of this only occasionally, and by reason of
Plutarch's opinion concerning those that are round about
the moon. As for the moon itself, he esteems it to be ^
lower kind gf heaven ; and therefore in another place he
calls it a terrestrial star, and an olympian or caelestial
tarth ; answerable, as I conceive, to the paradise of the
schoolmen*. And that paradise was either in, or near the
moon, is the opinion of some late writers, who derived it
(in all likelihood) from the assertion of Plato, and per-
haps, this of Plutarch. Tostatus lays this opinion upon
Isiodor. Hispalensis, and the venerable Bede, and Perius,
father it upon Strabus and Rabanus his master f. Some
would have it to be situated in such a place as could not be
discovered ; which cajised the penman of Esdras to make
it a harder matter to know the out-goings of paradise, than
to weigh the weight of the fire, or measure the blasts of
wind, or call again a day that is past J. But notwithstand-
ing this, there be some others, who think thaf it is on the
top of some high mountain under the line ; and these iar
terpreted the torrid zone to be the flaming sword whereby
paradise was guarded. It is the consent of divers others,
that paradise is situated iq some high and eminent place.
So Tostatus: Est etiam panidisas situ altissima^ suprct
cmnem terr^ altitudinem §. ^* Paradise is situated in some .
^' high place above^the earfh.'* And therefore in his
" comment upon the 49th of Genesis, he understands the
blessing of Jacob concerning the everlasting hills, to be
meant of paradise, and the blessing itself to be nothing else
but a promise of Chrisi's coming, by whose passion the
gates of paradise should be opened. Unto him assented
Rupertus, Scotus, and most of the other schoolmen, as I
find them cited by Percrius, and cut of him in Sir Walter
}lavvleigh1[. Their reason was this: because in probabi-
* Cur silent oracula. \ Sir W. Raw. 1. I.e. S. sect. 7. In Genes.
X 2 Es<ir. iv. 7. § In Genes.
^Conu'oent. in 3 Gen. v. 8. 1. 1. €.3. sect. 6, 7*
108 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A W0III,D*
lity, this place was not overflowed by the flood, since there
were no sinners there, which might draw that curse upon
it. Nay, Tostatus thinks that the body of Enoch yns kept
there; and some of the fathers, as TertuUian and Austin
have affirmed, that the blessed souls were reserved in that
place till the day of judgment ; and therefore it is likely
that it was not overflowed by the flood. It were easy to
produce the unanimous consent of the fathers, to prove
that paradise is yet really existent. Any diligent peruser
of them, may easily observe how they do' generally inter-
pret the paradise whereto St. Paul * was wrapt, and that
wherein our Saiviour promised the thief should be with
him, to be locally the same from whence our first parents
were banished. Now tliere cannot be any place on earth
designed where this should be ; and therefore it is not alto«»
gether' improbable that it was in this other world.
And besides, since all men should have went naked if
Adam had not fell, it is requisite therefore that it should
be situated in some such place where it might be privileged
from the extremities of heat and cold. But now this could
not be (they thought) so conveniently in any lower, as it
might in some higher air. For these and such like consi*
derations, have so many affirmed that paradise was in a
high elevated place : which some have conceived could be
no where but in the moon : for it could not be in the top of
any mountain ; nor can we think of any other body sepa-
rated from this earth, which can be a more convenient
place for habitation thin this planet ; therefore they con-
cluded that it was there.
It could not be on the top of any mountain :
1. Because we have express scripture, that the highest
of them was overflowed f*
2. Because it must be of a greater extension, and pot
some small patch of ground, since it is likely all men
should have lived there, if Adam had not fell. But for a
satisfaction of the arguments, together with a farther dis*
* 2 Cor. xii. 4. Luke xxiii. 43. f Gen. vii, 19.
tttAT TliE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 109
course of paradise, I shall refer you to those who have
written purposely upon this subject. Being content for my
own part to have spoken so much of it, as may conduce to
shew the opinion of others concerning the inhabitants of
the moon ; I dare not myself affirm any thing of thes^
Selenites, because I know not any ground whereon to
build any probable opinion. But I think that future ages
will discover more ; and our posterity, perhaps, may in-
vent some nleans for our better acquaintance with these
inhabitants.
PROP. XIV.
That it is possible for some of our posterity td find out a
conveyance to this other world; and if there be inhu'*
bitants there^ to have commerce with them.
ALL that hath been said concerning the people of the
new world, is but conjectural, and full of uncertain-
ties; nor can we ever look for any evident or more pro-
bable discoveries in this kind, unless there be some hopes
of inventing means for our conveyance thither. The pos-
sibility of which shall be the subject of our enquiry in this
last proposition.
And, if we do but consider by what steps and leisure, all
arts do usually rise to their growth, we shall have no cause
to doubt why this also may not hereafter be found out
amongst other secrets. It hath constantly yet been the
^method of providence, not presently to shew us all, but to
lead us on by degrees, from the knowledge of one thing
to anotlier.
It was a great while ere the planets were distinguished
£:pm the fixed stars ; and some time after that, ere the
morning and evening star were found to be the same ;
.^
110 THAT TffK MOON MAY BE A WORLrfl
and in greater space (I doubt not) but this also, and other
as excellent mysteries ilvill be discovered. Time, who
hath always been the father of new truths, and hath re-
vealed unto us many things which but ancestoi*s were igno-
irant of, will also manifest to our posterity that which wc
now desire, but cannot know. Veniet tempus (saith Sc*
neca*) quo ista qua nunc la tent , in lucem dies extvahet^ H
iongioris avi dUigenticu Time will come, when the eir-
dc:^v^urs of after-ages shall bring such things to light, as
now lie hid in obscurity. Arts are not yet come to their
Solstice ; but the industry of future tirtie's^ assisted with the
labourt of their forefathers, may reach that height which
ive could not attain to. Veniet tempus quo posieri nostri
fios turn aperta 7iescisse mirentur. As we now wonder at
the blindness of our ancestors, who were not able to discern
such things as seem plain and obvious unto us ; io will our
posterity admire our ignorance in as perspicuocaf matters.
In the first ages of the world, the inlanders thooglit
thertiselvcs either to be the only dwellers upon earth, or
else !: there were any other, they could not possibly con-
ceive how they might have any commerce with them,
being severed by the deep and broad sea. But after-limes
found out the invention of ships ; in which notwithstajid-
ing, none but some bold daring men durst venture, ae-*'
cording to that of the tragedian :
AucUix mn%iwn qui freta priniUs
Rate tam/ragili perfida rupitf.
Too bold was he, who in a ship so fi^ali,
First ventured on the treacherous Waves to salk
And yet now, how easy a thing is thJs ^tti to a timo-
rous and cowardly nature ? Arid questiorflcss, the inven-
tion of some other means for our conveyance to the moon»
^nnot seem more incredible to ' us, than this did at first
* Nat. ciu. 1. 7. c. 25. f Sen. Med. act. 1. Vide Hor. Od. S.
Juvenal, sat. 1$. Claud, praef. ad. 1 lib. de rap. Profcr.
THAT THE MOON MAY Bfe A WORLD. Ill
to them ; and therefore we have no just reason to oe dis-
'couraged in our hopes of the like success.
Yea, but (you will say) there can be no sailing thitheri
\inless that were true which the poet does but feign, that
she made htv bed in the sea. We have not now any
Drake, or Columbus, to undertake this voyage, or any
Daedalus to invent a conveyance through the air.
I answer, though we huve liot, yet why may not suc-
ceeding times raise up some spirits as eminent for new at-
tempts, and strange inventions, as any that Were before
them ? It is the opinion of Keplar*, that aS soon as the
art of flying is found out, some of their nation will make
one of the first colonies that shall transplant into that other
world. 1 suppose his appropriating this preheminence to
his own countrymen, may arise from an over-partial affec-
tion to them. But yet tlius far I agree with him, that
whenever that art is invented, or any other, whereby a
man may be conveyed some twenty miles high, or there-
abouts, then it is not altogether improbable that some ot
other may be successful in this attempt.
For the better clearing of which I shall first lay dowH^
and then answer those doubts that may make it ^teiA Ut-
terly impossible.
These are chiefly three.
The first, taken from the natui*al heaviness of a man's
body, whereby it is made unfit for the itiotioh of ascent,
together with the vast distance of that place from us.
2. From the extreme coldness of the aethereal air.
3. The extreme thinness of it.
Both which must needs make it impassible^ though it
were but as many single miles thither as it is thousands.
For the first. Though it were supposed that a man
could fly, yet we may well think he would be very slow in
it, since he hath so heavy a body, and such a one too, as
nature did not principally intend for that kind of motion.
It is usually observed, that amongst the variety of birdSi
^ Dissert, cum Nun. Syder.
■ .^
Hi THAT Tttlt.MOON MAT SB A WO&tD. ^
.those which do most converse upon the earth, and are swifteit
in their running, as a pheasant, partridge, !kC. together
With all domestical fowl, are less able for flig|Ht than otheri
which are for the most* part upon the wing, ak a swalloWf
iwift, &c. And therefore we may well think, that man
being not natarally endowed with any such condition as
may enable him for this motion; and being necessarily
tied to a more especial residence on the earth, must needs
be slower than any fowl, or less able to hold out. Thus it
is also in swimming ; which art, though it be grown to a
good eminence, yet he that is best skilled in it, is not
able either for continuance, or swiftness, to equal a fish ;
because he is not naturally appointed to it So that though
a man could fly, yet he would be so slow in it, and so
quickly weary, that he could never think to reach so great
a journey as it is to the moon.
But suppose withal that he could fly as fast and long
as the swiftest bird, yet it cannot possibly be conceived
how he should ever be able to pass through so vast a dis-
tance as there is betwixt the moon and our earth. For
this planet, according to the common grounds, is usually
granted to be at the least 52 semidiameters of the
earth from us; reckoning for each semidiameter 3456
English miles, of which the whole space will be about
179712.
So that though a man could constantly keep on in his
journey thither by a strait line, though he could fly a
thousand miles in a day, yet he would not arrive thither
under 180 days, or half a year.
And how were it possible for any to tarry so long with*
out diet or sleep ?
1. For diet. I suppose there could be no trusting to
that fancy- of Philo the Jew (mentioned before*,) who
thinks that the music of the spheres should supply the
strength of food.
♦ Prop. 3.
I
THAT THE MOON MAY ^ A ^ORLD.' 1131
Nor can we well conceive how a mail should be able ttf -
fcarry so much luggage with him, as might serve for h&
i^iaticwn inst} tedious a joutney.
2. But if he ^ouM, yet he must have s6me time to rest
and sleep in. And I believe he shall scarce find any lodg*'
ings by the way. No inils to entertaicf passengers, hot
any castles in the air (unless they be eftChanted ones)
to receive poor pilgrims, or errant knights. And so con-
sequently he cannot have any possible hopes of reaching
thither.
Notwithstanding all whith doubts, I shall lay dov^ this
position.
That supposing a man Could fly, or by any other roeansf
raise himself twenty milfes upwards, or thereabouts, it
were possible for him to come unto the moon.
As for those arguments of the first kind, that seem to
Overthrow the truth of this, they proceed upon a wrong
ground ; whilst they suppose that a condensed body, in
any place of the air, would always retain in it a strong
inclination of tending downwards towards the centre of
this earth. Whereas 'tis more probable, that if it were
t)ut somewhat above this orb of vaporous air, it might
there rest imrtiovable, and would not have in it any prO-
pension to this motion of descent.
For the better illustration of thi$, you must know, that
the heaviness of a body, or (as Aristotle defines it *) the
proneness of it to tend down unto some centre, is not any
absolute quality intrinsical unto it, as if where-^ver the
body did retain its essence, it must also retain this qua-
lity ; or as^ if nature had implanted in every Condensed
body appetitionetn centric K fugam extremitatist such
a love to the centre, and hatred to the extremities. Be-
cause one of these being less than a quantity, and the other
no more, cannot have any power of attraction or d6pul-*
Aon in them. According to that common principle,
guantitatis nulla est efficaciai '
* Deoaela, lib. 4. c. iv
toL. i. I
• \
114
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
But now the true nature of gravity is this. Its such ^
respective mutual desire of union, whereby condensed
bodies, when they come with\n the sphere of their own
vigour, do naturally apply themselves one to another by
attraction or coition. But being both without the reach of
cither's virtue, they then cease to move, and though they
have general aptitude, yet they have not any present incli-
nation or proneness to one another. And so consequently
cannot be styled heavy *.
The meaning of this will be more clearly illustrated by
a similitude. As any light body (suppose the sun) docs
send forth its beams in an orbicular form ; so likewise any
magnetical body, for instance a round loadstone, does cast
abroad his magnetical vigour in a sphere f. Thus
Where suppose the inward circle at A to represent the
loadstone, and the outward one betwixt B, C, the orb that
does determinate its virtue.
Now any other body that is like afiected coming within
this sphere, as B, will presently descend towards the cen-
tre of it, and in that respect may be styled heavy. But
place it without this sphere as C, and then the desire of
union ceaseth, and so consequently the motion also.
* SoKeplar, Sonin. Astron. N. 66. Cop^r.M. cap. 26. Foscari»
in epist. ad Sebast. Fantonum.
t Gilbert, de Magnet, 1. 2, cap. 7.
THAT tt*E MOON MAY HE A WORLD. 115
To apply then what hath been said. This gi-eat globe
bf earth and water hath been proved by many observations,
to participate of magnetical properties. And as the load-
stone does cast forth its own vigour round about its body,
in a magnetical compass, so likewise does our earth* The
difference is, that it is another kind of affection which
causes the union betwixt the iron and loadstone, from that
which makes bodies move unto the earth. The former is
some kind of nearness and similitude in their natures, for
which philosophy^ as yet, has not found a particular
name. The latter does arise from that peculiar quality
whereby the eaith is properly distinguished from the other
eljements, which is its condensity. Of which the more
any thing does participate, by so much the stronger will
be the desire of union to it. So gold and other metals
which are most close in their composition, are likewise
most swift in their motion of descent.
And though this may seem to be contradicted by the
instance of metals which are of the same weight, when
they are melted, and when they are hard : as also of water,
which does not differ in respect of gravity, when it i»
frozen, and when it is fluid : yet we must know that metals
are not rarified by melting, but mollified. And so too for
frozen waters, they are not properly condensed, but con*
gealed into a harder substance, the parts being not con-
tracted closer together, but still possessing the same ex-
tension. But yet (I say) 'tis very probable that there is
such a sphere about the earth, which does terminate its
power of attracting other things unto it* So that sup-
pose a body to be placed within the limits of this sphere,
and then it must needs tend downwards towards the centre
of it. But on the contrary, if it be beyond this compass,
then there can be no such mutual attraction ^ and so con-
sequently it must rest immovable from any such motion.
For the farther confirmation of this, I shall propose two
pertinent observations.
The first taken in the presence of many physicians, and
12
i
116 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
reJated by an eminent man in that profession, Hiercfn*
JPracastorius*. There being divers needles provided of
several kinds, like those of a mariner's chart ; they found
that there was an attractive power not only in the mag-
net, but that iron also, and steel, and silver did each of
them draw its own metal. Whence he concludes, omnc
irahit quod sibi simile est. And as these peculiar like-
nesses have such a mutual efficacy, so it is probable that
this more general qualification of condensity may be the
cause why things so affected desire union to the earth t*
And though 'tis likely that this would appear betwixt two
lesser condensed bodies, (as suppose two pieces of earth)
if they were both placed at liberty in their aethereal air,
yet being near the earth, the stronger species of this great
globe does, as it were, drown the less.
*Tis a common experiment, that such a lump of ore or
stone, as being on the ground, cannot be moved by less
than six men, being in the bottom of a deep mine, may
be stirred by two. The reason is, because Uien 'tis com-
passed with attractive beams, there being many above it
as well as below it. Whence we may probably infer
(saith the learned Verulam J), " That the nature of gravity
** does work but weakly also far from the earth •, because
*^ the appetite of union in dense bodies must be more dull
" in respect of distance." As we may also conclude from
the motion of birds, which rise from the ground but
heavily, though with much labour ; whereas being c i high,
they can keep themselves up, and soar about by the meet
extension of tHteir wings. Now the reason of this differ-
ence is not (as some falsely conceive) the depth of air
under them. For a bird is not heavier when there is but a
foot of air under him, than where there is a furlong. As
appears by a ship in the water, (an instance of the same
nature) which does not sink deeper, and so consequently iS'
not heavier, when it has but five fathom depth, than whea
* Lib. de Sympath. & Antip. c. 7,
t Vid. Bapt. Masul. exer. Acad, de atusct; excr. 4»
% Nat. Hist. Cent, 1. exper. 33. *
;' *
THAT THE MOOM MAY BE A WORLD. 117
it has fifty. But the true reason is, the weakness of the
desire of union in dense bodies at a distance.
So that from hence, there might be just occasion to tax
Aristotle and his followers, for teaching that heaviness is
an absolute quality of itself, and really distinct from con-
density: whereas it is only a modification of it, or rather
another name given to a condensed body in reference to
its motion.
For if it were absolute, then it should always be in-
herent in its subject, and not have its ess^Qce depend
upon the bodies being here or there. But it is not so^
For,
1 . Nothing is heavy in its proper place, according to his
own principle. Nihil grave est in suo loco. And then,
2. Nothing is heavy, which is so far distant from that
proper orb to which it does belong, that it is not within
the reach of its virtue. As was before confirmed.
But unto this it may be objected ; though a body being
so placed, be not heavy in actu secundo ; yet it is Vn actu
prifno: because it retains in it an inward proneness to
move downwards, being once severed from its proper
place. And this were reason enough why the quality of
heaviness should have an absolute being.
I answer, this distinction is only applicable to such natural
powers as can suspend their acts; and will not hold in
elementary qualities, whose very essence does necessarily
require an exercise of the second act, as you may easily
discern by an induction of all the rest. I. cannot say, that
body has in it the quality of heat, coldness, dryness, mois-r
ture, hardness, softness, &c. which for the present has not
the second act of these qualities. And if you mean by
the essence of them, a power unto them : why, there is
not any natural body but ha3 a pow^r to them all^
From that which hath been sai!d concerning the nature
of gravity, it will follow. That if a man were abov^ the
sphere of this magnetical virtue which proceeds firom the
earth, he might there stand as firmly in the open air, as
he can now upon the ground : afid not only so, but he
»
-.■ti
I
118 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLl>»
may also move with a far greater swiftness, than any living
creatures here belowj because then he is without ail gra»
vity, being not attracted any way; and so consequently
will not be liable to such impedin^ents as may in the least
manner resist that kind of motion which he shall apply him-
self imto.
If you yet enquire, how we may conceive it possible, that
» condensed body should not be heavy in such a place ?
I answer, by the same reason as a body is not heavy
in its proper place. Of this I will set down two in-
stances.
1. When a man is in the bottom of a deep river, though
lie have over him a multitude of heavy waters, yet he is
not burdened with the weight of them. Ai\d though ano<9
ther body, diat should be but of aq equal gravity with thesis
waters, when they are taken out, would be heavy enougjh
to press him to death ; yet notwithstanding whilst they ar^
In the channel, they do not in the least manner crush him
with their load. The reason is, because they ai'e both in
their right places ; and it is proper for the man, being the
more condensed body, to be lower than the waters. Or
rather thus, Because the body of the man does more neaVly
ligree with tlie earth, in this affection, which is the ground
of its attraction, and therefore doth that more strongly
attract It, than the waters that are over it. Now, as in
such a case, a body may lose the operation of its gravity,
which is, to move, or to press downwaids : so may it like?-
wise, when it is so far out of its place, that this attractive
power cannot reach unto it,
It is a pretty notion to tliis purpose, mentioned by Alber-
tus de Saxonia ^, and out of him by Francis Mendoca f, that
the air is in some part of it navigable. And that upon this
static principle, any brass or iron vessel (suppose a kettle)
ivhose substance is much heavier than that of the water ;
yet being filled with the lighter air, it will swim upon it,
gn4 not sink |. So suppose a cup, or wooden vessel, upo^
* Fhys. 1. 3. Q. art. 2.6. f Viriilar. 1, 4. prob, 47.
;j; \\d. Arch. 1. de iniidentibus humido,
."Sj."' \
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 119
the outward borders of this elementary air, the cavity of it
being filled with fire, or rather aetliereal air, it must neces-
sarily upon the same ground remain swimming there,
and of itself can no more fall, than an empty ship can
sink.
2. It is commonly granted, that if there were a hole
quite through the centre of tlie earth, though any heavy
body (as suppose a millstone) were let fall into it ; yet
when it came unto the place of the centre, it would there
rest immoveable in the air. Now, as in tliis case, its own
condensity cannot hinder, but that it may rest in the
open air, when there is no other place to which it should
be attracted ; so neither could it be any impediment unto
it, if it were placed without the sphere of the earth's mag-
netical vigor, where there should be no attraction at all.
From hence then (I say) you may conceive, that if a
man were beyond this sphere, he might there stand as
firmly in the open air, as now upon the earth. And if he
might stand there, why might he not also go there ? And if
so ; then there is a possibility likewise of having other
conveniences for travelling.
And here it is considerable, that since our bodies will
then be devoid of gravity, and other impediments of motion ;
we sliall not at all spend ourselves in any labour, and so
consequently not much need the reparation of diet : but
may perhaps live altogether without it, as those creatures
have done, who by reason of their sleeping for many day$
together, have not spent any spirits, and so not wanted any
food ; which is commonly related of serpents, crocodiles,
bears, cuckoos, swallows, and such like. To tliis puj^ose,
Mendoca * reckons up divers strange relations. As that of
Epimenides, who is storied to have slept 75 years, And
another of a rustic in Germany, who being accidentally
covered with a hay-rick slept there for all autumn, and the
winter following, without any nourishment.
Or, if this will not serve ; yet why may not a papist £ist
* Viridar. J. 4. prob. 24.
..!;»•
/I
120 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLO.
SO long, as well as Ignatius or Xaverius ? Or if there bt
$uch a strange efficacy in the bread of the eucharist, a^
their miraculous relations do attribute to it: why then^
that may serve well enough, for thjcir viaticum^
Or, if we must needs feed upon something else, why
may not smells nourish us ? Plptarch ♦ and Pliny t and
divers other ancients, tell u^ of a nation in India that lived
only upon pleasing odours. And it is the common opinion
of physicians, that these do strangely both strengthen and
repair the spirits. Hience was ;t that Dempcritus was able,
for divers days together, to feed himself with the meer
smell of hot bread :|:.
Or if it be necessary that our stomachs must receive the
food : why then it is not impossible that the purity of the
ethereal air, being not mixed with any improper vapours,
may be so agreeable to our bodies, as to yield us sufficient
aourishment *, according to that of the Poet § :
'Vescitur aura
ALtherca-
It was an old Platonic principle, that there is in some
part of the world such a place where men might be plen**
tifuUy nourished by the air they breathe : which cannot
more properly be assigned to any one particular, than tQ
the aethcreal air above th;s.
I know it is the common opinion, that no element can
prove aliment, because it is not proportionate to the bodies
of living creatures which are compounded ||. But,
1. The aethercal air is not an element ; and though it bf
purer, yet it is perhaps of a greater agreeableness to man's
nature and constitution.
2. If we consult experience and the credible relations of
pthers, we shall find it probable enough that many things
^receive nourishment from meet elements.
First, for the earth ; Aristotle *♦ and Pliny f f, those twq
* De fkcie in Luna. + Nat. Hist. 1. 7. c. 2. + Diog. Laer. 1. 1 . c. 9.
^ Virgil. II Arist. de Sens, c, 5. ** Hist. Animal. 1. §. c. 5^
tt Hist. L 10. C.72, * ■ '
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WQRLD. 121
great naturalists, tell us of some creatures, that are fed only
with this. And it was the curse of the serpent. Gen. iii^
14}. Upon thy belly shalt tlxou go, and dust shalt thou eat
all tlie days of thy life.
So likewise for the water. Albertus Magni^ * speaks
pf a man who lived seven weeks togetlier by the ngieer
drinking of water. Rondoletius f (to whose diligence these
later times are much beholden for sundry observations
concerning the nature of aquatils;) affirms that his wife
did keep a fish In a glass of water, without any other food,
for three years; in which space it was constantly aug-
mented, till at first it could not come out of the place at
wliich it was put in, and at length was too big for the glass
itself, though that were of a large capacity. Cardan tells u^
of some worms, that are bred and nourished by the snow,
from which being once separated, they die J.
Thus also is it with tlie air, which we may well conceive
does chiefly concur to the nourishing of all vegetables. For
if their food v^ere all sucked out from the earth, there must
needs be then some sensible decay in the ground by them ;
especially since they do every year renew their leaves
and fruits : wjiich being so many, and so often, could not be
produced without abundance of nourishment. To this pur-
pose is the experiment of treos cut down which will of
themselves put forth sprouts. As also that of onions, and
the seniper-vive, which will strangely shoot forth, and grow
as they hang in the open air. Thus likewise i$ . it with
some senysible creatures; the camelion (saith Plinyjj and
^olinus §) me^erly nourished by this: and so are the birds of
paradise, treated of by many, which reside constantly in the
air, nature having ^ot bestowed upon them any 'legs, and
therefore they are never seen upon the ground but being
^ead %. If you ask how they multiply ? It is answered, they
* De Animal. 1. 7. f I>e Pi»c. 1. 1. c. 12. % SubtiL i. 9.
II Hist. I. 8. cap. 33. Polyhistor. cap. 53*
§ Lop. hist. Ind. Oaid.cap^^G. Maiolus, Colloq. 3.
^ Tii likely that these binis do chiefly reside in the ajthcreal air^
\yberc chcy are nourished and iii'hcld.
122 THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD.
lay their eggs on the backs of one another, upon which thef
sit till their young ones be fledged. Rhondoletius*, from
the history of Hermolaus Barbarus, tells us of a priest (of
whom one of the popes had the custody) that lived forty
years upon meer air. As also of a maid in France, and
another in Germany, that for divers years together did feed
on nothing but this : nay, he affirms that he himself had
seen one, who lived till ten years of age without any other
nourishment. You may find most of these, and some
otlier examples to this purpose, gathered together by Men-
doca, Viridar. lib. 4. prob. 33» 24, Now, if this elementary
air, which is mixed with such improper vapours, may acci-
dentally nourish some persons; perhaps then, that pure
ethereal air may of itself be more natural to our tempers.
But if none of these conjectures may satisfy ; yet there
may haply be some possible means for the conveyance of
other food, as shall be shewed afterwards.
Again, seeing we do not thpn spend ourselves in any la-
bour, we shall not, it may be, need the refreshment of sleep.
But if we do, we cannot desire a softer bed than the air,
where we may repose ourselves firmly and safely as in our
chambers.
But here you may ask, whether there be any mesms for
us to know, how far this sphere of the earth's virtue does
extend itself?
I answer, 'tis probable that it does not reach much farther
than that orb of thick vaporous air, that encompasseth the
earth ; because 'tis likely the sun may exhale some earthly
Tapours, near unto the utmost bounds of the sphere allotted
to them.
Now there are divers ways used by astronomers, to take
the altitude of this vaporous air. As,
1. By observing the height of that air which causeth the
crepusculum, or twilight; for the finding of which, the
ancients used this means: as soon as ever they could discern
the air in the east to be altere<* ith the least light, they
♦ De Piscibus, 1. 1. cap. 13.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 123
would by the situation of tl>e stars find out how many de-
grees the sun wa^^ below the horizon, which was usually
about eighteen. From whence they would easily conclude,
how high that air must be above us, which the sun could
shine upon, when he was 18 degrees below us. And from
this observation, it was concluded to be about 52 miles
l^igh*.
But in this conclusion, the ancients were much deceived,
because they proceeded upon a wrong ground, whilst they
supposed that the shining of the sun's direct rays upon the
air, was the only reason of the cxepusculum ; whereas it i^
certain that there are many other things which may also
concur to the causing of itf. As,
1. Some bright clouds below the horizon, w]aich being
illuminated by the sun, may be the means of conveying
some light to our air, before the direct rays can touch it
2. The often refi-action of the rays, which sufler a fte-
quent repercussion from the cavity of this sphere, may
likewise yield us some light.
3. And so may the orb of enlightened air compassing the
sun, part of which must rise before his body.
2. The second way whereby we may more surely find
tlxe altitude of this grosser air, is by taking the heig^th of
the highest cloud : which may be done, 1. Either as they
use to measure the altitude of things that cannot be ap-
proached unto, viz. by two stations, when two persona
?hall at the same time, in several places, observe the de-
clination of any cloud from the vertical point. Or, 2«
which is the more easy way, when a man shall cTiuse such
a station, where he iji^y at sonae distance discern the place
on which the cloud does cast its shadow, and withal does
observe, how much both the cloud and the sun decline from
the vertical point J. From which he may easily conclude
tlie true altitude of it, as you naay more plainly concieive by
this following diagram. *
* Vitel. 1. 10. Theo. 7. f Keplar Ep. Coper. 1. 1, part 3,
f Steviixius, Geog, U 3. prop. 3. ^
124
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD^
Where A B is a perpendicular from the cloud, C the
station of him that measures, D the place where the shadow
of the cloud does fall.
The instrument being directed • from the station C, to
the cloud at A, the perpendicular will shew the angle B AC.
Then letting the 9un shine through the sights of your in-
strument, the petftendicular of it will give the angle BAD.
Afterwards having measured the distance C D by paces, you
may according to the common rules, find the heighth B A*.
But if without making the observation, you would know
of what altitude the highest of these are found by observa-
tion; Cardant answers, not above two miles ; KeplarJ no^
above 1 6000 psLC'es or thereabouts.
3, Another way to find the height of this vaporous air,
is, by knowing the difference of altitude which it causeth in
refracting the beams of any star near the horizon. And
firom this observation also, it is usually concluded to bo
about two or three miles high.
But now you must not conceive, as if the orb of magne-
tlcal vigour weris bounded in an exaet superficies, oi; as if it
did equally hold out just to such a determinate line, and no
farther. But, as it hath been said of the first region, which
is there terminated where the heat of reflexion does begin
to languish ; so likewise is it probable, that this magneticai
vigour does remit of its degrees proportionally to its distance
froftithe earth, which is the cause of it: and therefore
• Pitisc. Trigoa. f Subt. I. 17. t Epit^Cop. 1. 1. p.3i.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 125
though the thicker clouds may be elevated no higher, yet
this orb may be continued in weaker degrees a little beyond
them. We will suppose it (which in all likelihood is the
most) to be about twenty miles high. So that you see the
former thesis remains probable -, that if a man could but
fly, or by any other means get twenty miles upwards, il
were possible for him to reach unto the moon.
But it may be again objected; though all this were true;
though there were such an orb of air which did terminate
the earth's vigor: and though the heaviness of our bodies,
could not hinder our passage through tlie vast spaces of the
aethereal air ; yet those two other impediments may seer^
to deny the possibility of any such voyage,
1. The extreme coldness of that air. If some of our
higher mountains for this reason be not habitable, much
more then vnll those places be so, whidb «re farther from
any cause of heat.
2. The extreme thinness of it, which may make it unfit
for expiration. For, if in some mountains (as Aristotle tell*
us of Olympus, and out of him St. Austin*) the air be so
thin, that men cannot draw their breath, unless it were
through some moistened spunges ; much more then must
that air be thin, which is more remotely situated from the
causes of impurity and mixture. And then beside, the
I'efraction that is made by the vaporous air encompassing
our earth, may sufficiently prove that there is a great dif-
ference betwixt the sethereal air and this, in respect of
rarity. w,
To the first of these I answer, that though the second
region fee naturally endowed with so much coldness, as may
make it fit for the production of meteors ; yet it will not
hence follow, that all that air above it, which is not ap*"
pointed for the like purpose, should partake of the same
condition : but it may seem more probable, that this sethe-
real air is freed from having any quality in the extremes*
And this may be confirmed firom those common arguments,
* la Gen. ad literam, 1. 3. cap. 2,
126 THAT THE MOON MAY Bt A WORLD.
which are usually brought to prove the warmness of the
third region; as you may see in Fiomundus*» and others
who treat of that subject.
*Tis the assertion of Pereriusf, that the second region is
not cold merely for this reason, because it is distant from
the ordinary causes of heat, but because it was actually
made so at the first, for the condensing of the clouds, and
the production of other meteors that were there to be gene-
rated ; which (as I conceive) might be sufficiently confirmed
from that order of the creation observed by Moses, who
tells us that the waters above th^ firmament (by which,
in the greatest probability, we are to understand the cloudy
in the second region) were made the second day, Gen. i,
7, 8. whereas the sun itself (whose reflection is the cause
of heat) was not created till the fourth day, ver. 16, 19.
To the other objection I answer, that though the air in
the second region (where by reason of its coldness there are
many thick vapours) do cause a great refraction ; yet it is
probable that the air wliich is next the earth, is sometimes^
and in some places, of a far greater thinness; nay, as thin
as the athereal air itself; since soaietimes there is such a
special heat of the sun, as may rarify it in an eminent de-
gree : and in some dry places, there are no gross impure
exhalations to mix with it.
But here it may be objected : if the air in tke second
region were nlore condensed and heavy than tliis wherein
we breath, then that must necessarily tend downwards, and
possess the lower place.
To this soYne answer, that the hanging of the clouds in
the open air, is no less than a miracle. They are the words
of Pliny J: quid mirabilius aquis incalo stantibus? what
more wonderful thing is there, than that the w^aters should
stand in the heavens? Others prove this from the derivation
of the word d»DU? from T\kW siupescere and Q>D aqua; be-
cause the waters do hang there after such a stupendous in^
♦ Meteor, lib. I. ca. 2. art. 1. f Comment, in Gen, i. Si.
X Hist. 1. 3. cap. 1.
THAT THE MOON MAY BE A WORLD. 127
conceivable manner : which seems likewise to be favoured
by scripture, where it is mentioned as a great argument of
God's omnipotency, that he holds up the cloucis from fall-
ing. He binds up the waters in his thick clouds, and the
cloud is not rent under them*.
But that which unto me seems full satisfaction against
this doubt, is this consideration ; that tbi^ natural vigour
whereby the earth does attract dense bodies unto it, is less
efficacious at a distance ; and therefore a body of less den-
sity, which is near unto it, as suppose this thin air wherein
we breathe, may naturally be lower in its situation, than ano-
ther of a greater<:ondensity that is ferther off; as suppose
the clouds in the second region. And though the one be
absolutely, and in itself more fit for this motion of descent ;
yet by reason of its distance, the earth's magnetical virtue
cannot so powerfully work upon it.
As for that relation of Aristotle, if it were true, yet it does
not prove this air to be altogether impassible, since moist-
ened sponges might help us against its thinness : but it is
more likely that he took it upoQ trust, as he did some other
lelations concerning the height of the mountains, wherein
it is evident that he was grosly mistaken : as where he tells
us of Caucasus, that it casts its shadow 560 miiesf. And
this relation being of tlie same nature, we cannot safely
trust unto him for the truth of it.
If it be here enquired, what means there may be con-
jectured, for our ascending beyond the sphere of the earth's
magnetical vigour.
I answer. 1. It is not perhaps . impossible that a man
may be able to fly by the application of wings to his own
body: as angels are pictured, as Mercury and Daedalus are
feigned, and as hath been attempted by divers ; particularly
by a Turk in Constantinople, as Busbequius relates.
2. If there be such a great ruck in Madagascar, as Marcus
Polus| the Venetian mentions, the feathers in whose wings
* Job XKvu $. f Meteor. I. 1. c« 1 1. % I^* ^' c. 40.
w
*»
I2ft i^HAT TriE MOON MAY *£ A WORLD.
are twelve foot long, which can soop up a horse and hi5
rider, or aa elephant, as our kites do a mouse i why theri
it is but teaching one of these to carry a man, and he may
ride up thither, as Ganymede does, upon an eagle.
3. Or if neither of these ways will serve : yet I do seri-
ously, and upon good grounds affirm it possible to make a
flying-chariot; in which a man may sit, and give such i,
mot^n unto it, as shall convey him through the air. And
this perhaps might be made krge enough to carry divers
nien at the same time, together with food for their viaticum^
and commodities for traffic. It is not the bigness of any
thing in this kind, that can hinder its motion, if the motive
faculty be answerable thereunto. We see a great ship
swims as Well as a small cork, and an eagle flies in the air
as well as a little gnat.
This engine may be contrived from the same principles
by which Archytas made a wooden dove, and Regiomon-
tanus a wooden eagle.
I conceive it were no difficult matter (if a man had leisure)
to shew more particularly the means of composing it.
The perfecting of such an invention, would be of such
excellent use, that it were enough, not only to make a man
famous, but the age also wherein he lives. For besides the
strange discoveries that it might occasion in this otlier
world, it would be also of inconceivable advantage for tra-*
veiling, above any other conveyance that is now in use.
So that notwithstanding all these seeming impossibilities^
it is likely enough, that there may be a means invented of
jounieying to the moon ; and how happy shall they be, that
are flrst successful in this attempt ?
' ■ ■ ■ ' Felicesque anima, quas ?iubila supra,
Et turpesfumospplenumque vaporibus orbem,
Jnservit cash saneti schUiUa Promethei.
Having thus finished this discourse, I chanced upon a
late fancy to thils purpose, under the feigned name of Do*
iningo Gonsalesy written by a late rsiverend and learife^
* ■ V*"
THAT THE f^OC-N ItfAY BE A WORLjJ. 1/W
bishop : in which (besides sundry particulars wherein this
lat^r chapter did unwittingly agree with it) there is deli-
vered a very pleasant and well-contrived fancy concerning
a voyage to this other world.
He supposeth that there is a natural and usual passage
for many creatures betwixt our earth and this planet Thus
he says, those great multitudes of locusts, wherewith divers
countries have been destroyed, do proceed from thence.
And if we peruse the authors who treat of them, we shall
find that many times they fly in numberless troops, or
swarms, and for sundry days together pefoxe they, fall, are
seen over those places in great high clouds, such as com-
ing nearer, are of extension enough to obscure the day, and
hinder the light of the sun. From which, together with
divers other such relations, he concludes that it is not alto-
gether improbable they should proceed from the moon.
Thus likewise he supposeth the swallows, cuckoos, night-
ingales, with divers other fowl, which are with us only half
the year, to fly up thither, when they go from us. Amongst
which kind, there is a wild swan in the East Indies, which
at certain seasons of the year do constantly take their flight
thither. Now this bird being of great strength, able to
continue for a long flight, as also going usually in flocks,
like our wild-geese ; he supposeth that many of them to-
gether, might be taught to carry the weight, of a man; es-
pecially if an engine were so contrived (aa he thinks it
might) that each of them should bear an equal share in the
burthen. So that by this means it is easily conceivable,
how once every year a man might finish such a voyage ;
going along with these birds at the beginning of winter,
and again returning with them at the spring.
And here, one that had a strong fancy, were better able
to set forth the great benefit and pleasure to be had by such
a journey. And that whether you consider the strange-
ness of the persons, language, arts, policy, religion of those
inhabitants, together with the new traflSc that might be
brought tlience. In briefs do but consider the pleasure and
VOL. I. K
.- I
■ I
130 THAT TRt MOOir MAY BE A WO1.L0.
profit of those later discoveries in America, and we mus^
needs conclude this to be inconceivably beyond it.
But such imaginations as the8e> I shall leave to the fancy
of the reader.
Sic itur ad astra.
Reftet humi qwcunqtie velit
C(Bfo resUU iter, c^io ieniabitnus ir^
i.
• BOOK II.
A
DISCOURSE
CONCERNING A
IfEW PLANET,
TENDING TO FROVE, THAT (FT IS FROBABLE)
OUR EAETH IS ONE OF THE PLANETS:
X>igna res en contemplatioM» ut scUmus in quo rertUB Itatu scimus : pigtri-i
mam sortiti^ an velocissimam wp^ntm i circa &ofi deus onuuay an not agat
Stn, JVW. ^umt^ lib. 7. cap. 9.
1^2
"it
i. W f.'
TO THE READER.
J^OT to trouble you with an invective against those muU
titudes of pamphlets which are every day pressed into
the world; or an apology y why this was published amongst
the rest (the usual matter fojr such kind of epistles : J let me
in brief premonish you something concerning the
i
CHIEF SCOPE 1
and V of this following Discourse.
MANNER 3
1. it is not the purpose of it to set down an exact treatise
qf this kind qf astronomy y but rather to rein&oe those com'-
vwn prejudices which usually deter men from taking any
argument^ tending this way^ into their considerations. lor
we may observe^ that in those points which ate cried down
by the more general opinion^ men do for the mest part rest
iherttselves in the superficial knowledge of things^ as they
seem at their first appearances^ thinking they can say
enough to any paradox^ against which they can urge the
most obvious and easy objections; and therefore seldom or
never search into the depth of these points^ or enter into any
serious impartial examination of thdse grounds on which they
are bottomed. Which as it must needs be a great hindrance
to the proficiency of all kind of learnings so moi^e especially
is it in this particular. We might discern a greater come-
liness and order in this great fabrick of the worlds and
more easily understand the appearances in astronomy y if we
could with indifferency attend to what might be said for
that opinion of CopernicuSy which is here defended.
2. For the manner. It is. not maintained with such heat
and religion^ as if every one that reads it were presently
bound to yield up his assent : but as it is in other wars where
victory cannot be hady men must be content with peace: so
likewise is it in thisy and should be in all other philosophical
to THE REAbER.
contentions. If there be nothing able to convince and satisfy
the indifferent reader , he may still enjoy his own opinion.
^11 men have not the same way of apprehending things ; but
according to the variety of their temper^ custom^ and abilv-
iiest their understandings are severally fashioned to differ^
ent assents: which had it been but well considered by some
ijfour hot adversaries'^ i they would not have shewed more
violence in opposing the petsons against whom they write^
than strength in confuting the cause.
It is an excellent rule to be observed in all disputes y that
men should give soft words and hard arguments; that they
ioeuld not so much striifc to vex^ as to convince an enemy i
If this were but diligently practised in all casesy and on all
sideSf ^e might in a good measure be freed from those vex^
ations in the search of truths which the wise Solomon^ by his
(Bwn experience did so much complain of Ecchsiastes i. 18.
In much wisdo^n there is much gritf; and he that increase tb
knowledgCi increaseth sorrow.
To conclude: though there should be ru>thing in this dis^
course conducible to your information and benefit; yet it
m^ serve in the perusal^ as it did in the composure^ for the
Recreation of such leisure hours as may conveniently be
spared from more weighty employments.
. \ "^ Farewell.
%^ ♦ Fromond. AL Ros^.
/
I.
BOOK tt.
THAT THE EAHTH MAY BE A PLANET.
is±i±
PROP. I
Ithat the seeming novelty and singulariiy qftkis opiinM%
can be no sufficient reason to prote it erroneous*
IN the search of theological truths, It is the safest methodt
first of ail to look unto divine authority ; because that
carries with it as clear an evidence to our feith, as any thing
else. can be to our reason. But on the cohtrary, in the ex-
amination of philosophical points, it Were a preposterous
course to begin at the testimony and opinion of others^ and
then afterwards to descend unto the reasons that may be
drawn from the nature and essence of the things themselves :
because these inartificial arguments (as the logicians call
them) do not carry with them any clear and convincing
evidence ; and therefore should come after those that are
of more necessary dependance, as serving rather to confirnif
than resolve the judgment.
But yet, so it is, that in those points which are besides
the common opinion, meii are carried aWay at the first by
the general cry» and seldom or never come so far, as ta
examine the reasons that may be urged for them. And
therefore, since it is the purpose of this disconrse, to re*
move those prejudices which may hinder our judgment in
the like case, it is requisite that in the first place there be
some satisfaction given to those arguments that may be
taken from the authority of others.
Which arguments are insisted on by our adversaries
with much heat and violence.
136 TrtAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET^
What (say they) shall an upstart novelty thrust out
such a truth as hath passed by successive tradition through
all ages of the world ; and hath been generally enter-
tained, not only in the opinion of the vulgar, but also
of the greatest philosophers, and most learned men*?
Shall we think that amongst the multitude of those who
in several times have Ueen eminent for new inventions,
and strange discoveries, there was none able to find out
such a secret as this, besides some fabulous Pythago-
reans, and of late Copernicus? Is it probable that the
world should last for above five thousand years together,
and yet the inhabitants of it be so dull and stupid, as to be
Unacquainted with its motion ? Nay, shall we tliink that
those excellent men whom the Holy Ghost made use of
in the penning of scripture, who were extraordinarily in-
spired with supernatural truths, should notwithstanding be
so grossly Ignorant of so common a matter as this ? Can we'
believe, if there were any such thing, that Joshua, and
Job, and David, and Solomon, &c. should know nothing of
it ? Certainly it must needs argue a strotig affectation of
singularity, for a man to take up any groundless fancy
against such ancient and general authority.
I answer : as we should not be so fondly conceited of
ourselves, and the extraordinary abilities of these prjesent
ages, as to think every thing that is ancient to be obsolete :
or, as if it must needs be with opinions as it is with
clothes; where the newest is for the most part best. So
neither should we be so ^superstitiously devoted to anti-
quity, as to take up every thing foi* canonical, which drops
from the pen of a father, or was approved hy the consent
cf the ancients. It is an excellent saying, Aei eKev^^m etvcu
rvi yvtayjvi t9v y^KKovrx (^iXoffoCpeiv- It behoves every one in
the search of trutbi always to preserve a philosophical
liberty ; not to be so enslaved to the opinion of any man,
as to think whatever he says to be infallible. We must
* Alex. Ross de terrs motu, contra Laasb. L 1. sect. 1« cap. 10.
t Alcinous.
THAT TH£ £ARTH MAY BE A PLANET. ISI
labour to find out what things are in themselves, by our
own experience, and a thorough examination of their na-
tures, not what another says of them. And if in such an
impartial enquiry, we chance to light upon a new way,
and that which is besides the common road, this is neither
our fault, nor our unhappiness.
Not our fault, because it did not arise from singularity
or affectation. Not our unhappiness, because it is rather
a privilege to be the first in finding out such truths as are
not discernible to every common eye. If novelty should
always be rejected, n^either would arts have arrived to that
perfection wherein now we enjoy them, nor could we ever
hope for any future reformation : though all truth be in it-
self eternal, yet in respect of men's opinions, there is
scarce any so ancient but had a beginning, and was once
counted a novelty ; and if for this reason it had been con-
den^ned as an error, what a general darkness and igno-
rance would then have been in the world, in comparison
of that light which now abounds ; according to that of the
poet;
Quod si tarn antiquis nopitas invisafuisset,
Quam Tiobis, quid nunc esse vetus aut quid haheret,
-iQ^od kgeret tereretque viritim pvhlicus usus* f
li our forefathers had but hated thus.
All that were new ; what had been old to us ?
Or> how might any thing confirmed be.
For public u-se by its antiquity ?
But for more full satisfaction of all those scruples that
may arise from the seeming novelty or singularity of this
^opinion, I shall propose these following considerations.
1. Suppose it were a novelty, yet it is in philosophy, and
that is made up of nothing else ; but receives addition from
every day's experiment. True indeed, for divinity we have
ian infaUible rule that does plainly inform us of all necessary
trutlis ; and therefore the primitive times are of greater
* Horat. lib. 2. ep. 1.
i
ii^ TRAf tHE £ArTH MAT BE A PLA17ET
authority, because they were nearer to those holy men wh<y
were the penmen of scripture. But now for philosophy,
there is no such reason : whatever the schoolmen may talk^
yet Aristotle's works are not necessarily true, and he him-^
Self hath by sufficient arguments proved himself to be liabl^
unto errot. Now in this case, if we should speak properly^
antiquity does consist in the old age of the worid, not in the
youth of it. In such leatning as may be increased by fresh
experiments and new discoveries ; it is we are the fathers^
and of more authority than former ages; because we have
the advantage of more time than they had, and truth (we
say) is the daughter of time. However, there is nothing in
this opinion so magisteriaUy proposed, but the reader may
use his own liberty; and if all the reasons considered, toge*
ther do not seem convincing unto him, he may freely reject
it.
In those natural points which carry with them any doubt
or obscurity, it is the safest way to suspend our assents ; and
though we iriay dispute pro or c(w, yet not to settle our
opinion on either side.
2. In weighing the authority of others, it is not their
multitude that should prevail, or their skill in some things
that should make them of credit in every thing ; but we
should examine what particular insight and experience they
had in those things for which they are cited. Now it is
plain, that common people judge by their senses, and there-"
fore their voices are altogether unfit to decide any philoso*
phical doubt, which cannot well be examined or explained
without discourse and reason. And as for the ancient fa<*
tliers, though they were men very eminent for their holy
lives, and extraordinary skill in divinity, yet they weic most
of them very ignorant in that part of learning which cofl-
ceims this opinion ; as appears by many of their gross mis*
takes in this kind ; as that concerning the antipodes, &c.
and therefore it is not their opinion neither, in this business,
that to an indifferent seeker of truth will be of any strong
authority.
TriAT THfe EARTH MAY BE A PLAN^, 139
But against this it is objected*. That the instance of the
Antipodes does not argue any special ignorance in theses
learned men ; or that they had less skijl in such human
arts than others ; since Aristotle himself^ and Pliny, did
deny this as well as they.
I answer:
1. If they did, yet this does make mor^ to the present
purpose : for if such great scholars, who were so eminent
for their knowledge in natural things, might yet notwith«>
standing be grossly mistaken in such matters as are now evi<^
dent and certain, why then we have no reason to depend
upon their assertions or authorities^ as if they were infalli^*
ble.
2. Though these great naturalists, for want of some ex-
perience, were mistaken in that opinion, whilst they thought
no place was habitable but the temperate zones : yet it
cannot be from hence inferred that they denied the pos«
sibility of antipodes; since these are such inhabitants as
live opposite unto us in the other temperate zone: and
it were an absurd thing to imagine that those who lived in
different zones, can be antipodes to one another; and av*
gues that a man did not imderstand, or else had forgotten
that common distinction in geography, wherein the relation
of the world's inhabitants unto^ one another are reckoned
Up under these three heads; aniacU periieciy and antipodes.
But to let this pass: it is certain, that some of the fathers
did deny the being of any such, upon other more absurd
grounds. Now if such as Chrysostom, Lactantius, &c. who
were noted for great scholars ; and such too as flourished in
these latter times, when all human learning was more ge-
nerally professed, should notwithstanding be so much mis-
taken in so obvious a matter: why then may we not think
that those primitive saints, who were the penmen of scrip-
ture, and eminent above' others in their time for holiness
' and knowledge ; might yet be utterly ignorant of many
philosophical truths, which are commonly known in th^e
« AJex. Koss. 1. 1. sect. c. 8.
140 THAT THE EARTH MAY 6E A PLANET.
days? It is probable, that the Holy Ghost did inform them
only with the knowledge of those things whereof they were
' to be the penmen, and that they were not better skilled in
points of philosophy than others. There were indeed some
of them who were supernaturally endowed with human
learning ; yet this was, because they might thereby be fitted
for some particular ends, which all the rest were not ap-
)>ointed unt6 : thus Solomon was strangely gifted with all
kind of knowledge, in a great measure; because he was to
teach us by his own experience the extreme vanity of ity
that we might not so settle our desires upon it, as if it were
ablcito yield us contentment*. So too the apostles were
extraordinarily inspired with the knowledge of languages,
because they were to preach unto all nations. But it will
not hence follow, that therefore the other holy penmen
were greater scholars than others. It is likely that Job had
as much human learning as most of tliem, because his book
is more especially remarkable for lofty expressions, and
discourses of nature ; and yet it is not likely that he was
acquainted with all those mysteries which later ages have
discovered ; because when God would convince him of his
own folly and ignorance, he proposes to him such questions,
as being altogether unanswerable ; which notwithstanding,
any ordinary philosopher in these days might have resolved.
As you may see at large in the thirty-eighth chapter of
that book.
The occasion was this: Jobf having before desired that
he might dispute with the Almighty concerning the up-
rightness of his own ways, and the unreasonableness of
those afflictions which he ifnderwent, does at length obtain
his desire in this kind; and God vouchsafes, in this tliirty-
eighth chapter, to argue the case with him. Where he
does shew Job how unfit he was to judge of the ways of
providence, in disposing of blessings and afflictions ; when
as he was so ignorant in ordinary matters, being not able to
discern the reason of natural and common events. As why
* £cd.i. 18. f Cap.xiii.3.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLACET. 141
the sea should be sa bounded from overflowing the land* I
What is the breadtli of the earth f ? What is tlie reason of
the snow or hailt ? What was the cause of the rain or dew,
of ice and frosft, and the like || ? By which questions, it;
seems, Job wa^so utterly puzzled, that he is fain afterwards
to hunablehimkelf in this acknowledgment: I have uttered
that I understood not, things too wonderful for me, whicb
I knew not. Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust
and ashes §. i
So that it is likely these holy meQ had not these human
arts by any special inspiration, but by instruction and study,
and other ordinai^y means ; and therefore Moses his skill
in this kind is called the learning of the Egyptianslf- Nfpw,
because in those times all sciences were taught only in a rude
and imperfect manner ; therefore it is likely that they also ^
had but a dark and confused apprehension of things, and
were liable to the common errors. And for this reason is
it, why Tostatus** (speaking of Joshua's bidding the moon
stand still as well as the sun) says, 2uod forte erat impe-
ritus circa astrorum dodrinarrif sentient ut mdgares senii"
unt: that perhaps he was unskilful in astronomy, having
the same gross conceit of the heavens, as the vulgat had.
From all which it may be inferred, that the ignorance of
such good men and great scholars concerning these philo*
sophical points, can be no sufficient reason, why after ex?
amination we should deny them, or doubt of their truth.
3. It is considerable, that in the rudiments and first be-*
gipnings of astronomy, and so in several ages after, this
opinion hath found many patrons, and those too men of
eminent note and learning. Such was more especially Py-
thagoras, who was generally and highly esteemed for his
divine wit, and rare inventions ; under whose mysterious
sayings, there be many excellent truths to be discovered.
But against histestii^ony, it is again objectedft; ifPytha-r
* Ver. 8, 10, 11. f Ver. 18. t Ver. 22. || Ver. 28, 29.
§ Cap. xlii. ver. 3, 6. ^ Acts vii. 22.
** Jogh. c. 10. Quxst. 13, t+ Alex. Roi. l.TJ. sect. 2. c. 10,
142 THAT THB EARTH MAY BE A PLANET..
goras were of this opinion, yet his authority should not be
of aqy credit, because he was the author of many other
monstrous absurdities.
To this I answer; if a man's error in some particulars
should take away his credit for every thing else, this wouI4
abolish the force of all human authority ; for humanum esi
errare. Secondly, it is probable that many of Pythagoras's
sayings which seem so absurd, are not to be understood ac-r
cording to their letter, but in a mystical sense.
2. But he objects again, that Pythagoras was not of this
opinion ; and that for two reasons ; first, because no ancient
;iuthor that he had read ascribes it unto him. Secondly, it
js contradictory to his other opinions, concerning the har-
mony that was made by the motion of the heavens; which
could not consist with dii» other of the earth's motion.
To the first I answer; the objector could not chuse but
know that this assertion is by many ancient authors ascribed
to .that sect whereof Pythagoras was the chief. He might
have seen it expressly in Aristotle^ himself, Oi ii HxAiyo^eiof
h^yoxmv BXf yjv tou lutrta isv^ meu^ n^v ts yv^t ev rov offr^
pwruv KW\Xc^ 0eqo(uv^y 7g€ft iietrtv^ vuxr« re tau iiie^eev voietv.
In which the philosopher does compendiously reckon up
the three chief particulars implied in the opinion of the
Pythagoreans. First, the sun's being in the centre of the
world. Secondly, the earth's annual motion about it, as
being one of the planets. Thirdly, its diurnal revolution,
whereby it £ause,d day and night.
To his second reason I answer; first, that Pythagoras
thought the earth to be one of the planets (as appeals by
Aristotle's testimony concerning him) and to move amongst
the rest. So that his opinion concerning the motion of the
heavens is not inconsistent with that of the earth. Se-
condly, hut as for the celestial harmony, he might perhaps
under this mystical expression, according to his usual cus-
tom, shadow forth unto us that mutual proportion and hac-
monical consent, which he did conceive in the several big-
'^ De Capio, 1. ?. c. 13.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BIE A PLANET. 145
pesSy distance, motions of the orbs. So that notwithstandt
ing these objections, it is evident that Pythagoras was of
this opinion, and tliat his authority m^y add somewhat for
the confirmation of it. Unto him assented Aristarchus
Samius^, who flourished about 280 y^ars .before the birth of
our Saviour; and was by reason of this opinion, arraigned
for profaneness and sacrilege bytbe Areopagites; because
he had blasphemed the deity of Vesta, af&rming the earth,
to move. To them agreed Philolaus, Heraclidcs, Pontius,
Nicetas, Syracusanus, Ecphantus, Lucippus, and Plato himr
$elf (as s5me think.) So likewise Numa Pompilius, as
Plutarch relates it in his life; who in reference to this opi-
nion, built the temple of Vesta round, like tlie universe; in
the middle of it was placed the perpetual vestal fire ; by
which he did represent the sun in the centre of the world,
All these men were in their several times of special note, as
well for their extraordinary learning, as for this opinion.
4. It is considerable, that since this science of astrononiy
hath been raised to any perfection, there have been mahjr
of the best skill in it, that have assented unto that assertioa
which is here defended. Amongst whom was the cardinal
pusanusf, but more especially Copernicus, who was a maa
very exact and diligent in these studies for above thirty
years together, from the year 1500 to 1530, and upwards;
and since him, most of the best astronomers have been of
this side. So that now there is scarce any of note and
skill, who are not Copemicus's followers; and if we should
go to most voices, this opinion would carry it from any
other. It would be too tedious to reckon up the names of
those that may be cited for it ; I will only mention some of
the chief; sudi were Joachinus Rheticus, an elegant writer;
Christopherus Rothman ; Mestlin, a man very eminent for
bis singular skill in this science; who though at the first he
were a follower of Ptolemy, yet upon his second and more
exact thoughts, he concluded Copernicus to'be in the right;
and that the usual hypothesis, prascriptume potius quar^
f ^chimedet 0e arfi^s nuflnero. \ Pe 4oct. ignor. 1. 2. cap. 12.
. \
1. 1
1' ■ *
•
/ .
144. THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PtAKBV.
ratime valft*^ does prevail more by prescription than rea^
son. So likewise Erasmus Reinoldus, who was the man
that calculated the prutenical tables fh>m Copernicus his
Observations, and did intend to write a commentary upon
his other works, but that he was taken out of this life before
he could finish those resolutions. Unto these also I might
add the names of Gilbert, Keplar, Galilaeus, with sundry-
others, who have much beautified and confirmed this hy-
pothesis, with their new inventionst. Nay I may safely
affirm, that amongst the variety of those opinions that are
in astronomy, there are more (of those which have skill in
it) that are of this opinion, not only than any other side,
but than all the rest put together. So that now it is a
greater ai'gumcnt of singularity to oppose it.
5. It is probable, that many other of the ancients would
have assented unto this opinion, if they had been acquainted
with those experiments which later times have found out
for the confirmation of it : and therefore Rheticus^ and
Keplarll do so often wish that Aristotle were now alive
again. Questionless, he was so rational and ingenious a
man, (not half so obstinate as many of his followers) that
upon such probabilities as these, he would quickly have re-
nounced his own principles, and have come over to this side :
for in one place, having proposed some questions about the
heavens§, which were not easy to be resolved, he sets down
this rule ; that in difficulties, a man may take a liberty to
speak that which seems most likely to him ; and in such
cases, an aptness to guess at some resolution, for the satis-
fying of our philosophical thirst, does deserve rather to be
stiled by the name of modesty, than boldness. And in a*-
nother placelf* he refers the reader to the different opinions
of astronomers, advising him to examine their several te-
nets, as well Eudoxus as Calippus ; and to entertain that
(not which is most ancient, but) which is most exact and
• Praef. ad Narrat. Khetici. f Ibid. J In narrationc.
II Myst. Cosmogr. e. 1. item Praef. ad 4. 1. Astr. Copcm.
§ De CobL L 3. c. 12. H Met. lib. 12. cap. a.
1 ■ ■ w ■ --
. I'kAT THE EARTH MAy BE A PLAFETi 145
iigreeable to reason. And as fbt Ptplomyi it i^ his counsfel*,
that we should endeavour to frame such suppositions of the
heavens, as ooiight be more simple, being void of ail super-
fluities: and he confesses, that his hypothesis had many
implications in it, together with sundry intricate and un-
likely turnings ; and therefore in the ^ame place; he seems
to admonish us, that we should not be too Confident the
heavens were really in the same form wherein astronomer^
did suppose them. So that it is likbly, it was his chief in-
tent to propose unto us such a frame of the celestial bodies^
from which we might, in some measure, conceive of their
different appearances; and according to which, we might
be able to calculate their motions. But now it is Coperni-
cus's endeavour, to propound unto us the true natural causes
of these several motions and appearances : it was the in-
tent of the one, to settle the imagination ; and of the other,
to Satisfy the judgment. So that we have no reason to
doubt of his assent unto this opinion, if he had but clearly
understood all the grounds of it.
It is reported of Clavius^ that when lying upon his death-
bed, he heard the first news of those diseovferies which
were made by Galilaeus's glass, he brake forth into these
wqrds: videre astronomos^ quo pccto constituendi sunt orbes
ccelestes^ ut hac phuenomena salvari ppssint ; that it did be-
hove astronomers to consider of some other hypothesis^
beside that of Ptolomy, whereby they might solve all those
new appearances. Intimating that this old one, which for-
merly he had defended, would not now serve the turn : and
doubtless, if he had been informed how congruous all these
might have been unto the opinion of Copernicus, he would
quickly havel turned on that side. It is considerable, that
amongst the followers of Copernicus, there are scarce any
who were not formerly against him; and such, as at first
had been thoroughly seasoned with the principles of Ari-
stotle ; in which, for the most part, they have no less skill
than those who are so violent iathe defence of them,u
* Aim. 1. 13. cap; ji.
rot. ii t ■
146 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
Whereas on the contrary, there ^re very few to be found
amongst the followers of Aristotle and Ptolomy, that have
read any thing in Copernicus, or do fully understand the
grounds of his opinion ; and I think, not any, who having
been once settled with any strong assent on this side, that
have afterwards revolted from it. Now if we do but seri-
ously weigh with ourselves, that so many ingenious, consi-
dering men, should reject that opinion which they were
nutsed up in, and which is generally approved as the truth ;
and that for the embracing of such a paradox as is con-
demned in schools, and commonly cried down, as being
absurd and ridiculous; I say, if a man do but well consider
all this, he must needs conclude, that there is some strong
evidence for it to be found out by examination ; and that in
all probability, this is the righter side.
7. It IS probable, that most of those authors who have
opposed this opinion, since it hath been confirmed by new
discoveries, were stirred up thereunto by some of these
three insufficient grounds,
1 . An over-fond and partial conceit of their proper in-
ventions. Every man is naturally niore affected to his own
brood, than to that of which another is the author; though
perhaps it may be more agreeable to reason. It is very
difficult for any one, in the search of truth, to find in him-
self such an indifrerency, as that his judgment is not at all
jswayed by an over-weaning affection unto that which is
proper unto himself. And this perhaps might be the first
reason that moved the noble Tycho with so much heat to
oppose Copernicus, that so he might the better make way
for the spreading of that hypothesis which was of his own
invention. To this I might likewise refer that opinion of
Origanus and Mr. Carpenter, who attribute to the earth
only a diurnal revolution. It does more especially concern
those men that are leaders of several sides, to beat down
any that should oppose them.
2. A servile and superstitious fes^r of derogating from the
authority of the ancients, or opposing that meaning of scrip-
ture-phrases, wherein the suppose^ infallible church hath
fHAt THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 147
for a long time understood them. It is made part of the
new creed, set forth by Pius the Fourth, 1564. That no
man should assent unto any interpretation of scripture,
which is not approved of by the authority of the fathers.
And this is the reason why the Jesuits, who are otherwise
the greatest afFectors of those opinions which seem to be
new and subtil, do yet forbear to say any thing in defence
of this ; but rather take ail occasions to inveigh against it.
One of them*, does expressly condemn it for a heresy.
And since him, it hath been called in by two sessions of the
cardinalsf, as being an opiniofi both absurd and dangerous.
And therefore likewise do they punish it, by casting the
defenders of it into the pope's truest purgatory, the inqui-
sition : but yet neither these councils, nor ahy (that I know
of) since them, have proceeded to such a peremptory cen-
sure of it, as to conclude it a heresy; fearing perhaps, lest
a more exact examination, and the discovery of future
times, finding it to be an undeniable truth, it might redound
to the prejudice of their church, and its infallibility. And
therefore he that is most bitter against it, in the heat and
violence of opposition, will not call it a heresy: the worst
that he dares say of it, is, that it is opinio temeraria qvuB
altera saltern pede intramt haresios limenX : a rash opinion,
and bordering upon heresy. Though unto this likewise he
was incited by the eagerness of disputation, and a desire of
victory ; for it seems many eminent men of that church
before him, were a great deal more mild and moderate in
their censures of it.
Paul the Third was not so much ofended at Copernicus^
when he dedicated his work unto him.
The cardinal of Cusa does expressly maintain this opi-
nion.
Schonberg^us, the cardinal of Capua, did with much im*
portunity and great approbation, beg of Copernicus the
commentaries that he writ in this kind ; and it seems the '
* Serrarius Commen. in Jos. cap. 10. quaest. 14 . So lipsius, Fhysiol.,1. 2.
t Ann. Dom. 1616. kern 1633. % Fronvondus, Antarist. cap ,6.
l2
i
148 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
fathers of the council of Trent were not such confident
defenders of Ptolomy*s hypothesis against Copernicus, as
many now are. For, speaking of those intricate subtilties
which the fancies of men had framed to maintain the prac-
tice of the church, they compared them to astronomers,
who, say they, do feign excentrics and epicicles, and such
engines of orbs, to save the phaenomena ; though they know
there are no such things. But now, because this opinion
of Copernicus in later times hath been so strictly forbidden
and punished, it will concern those of that religion, to take
heed of meddling in the defence of it, but rather to submit
the liberty of their reason under the command of their su-
periors, and (which is very absurd) even in natural ques«
tions, not to assent unto any thing but what authority shall
allow of.
3. A judging of things by sense rather than by discourse
and reason: a tying of the meaning of scripture to the let-
ter of it, and frotn thence concluding philosophical points,
together with an ignorance of all those grounds and proba«
bilities in astronomy, upon which this opinion is bottomed.
And this, in all likelihood, is the reason why some men,
who in other things perhaps are able scholars, do write so
vehemently against it; and why the common people in
general do cry it down, as bf^ing absurd and ridiculous. Un-
der this head I might refer the opposition of Mr. Fuller,'
Al. Ross. &c.
But now, no prejudice that may arise from the bare au-
thority of such enemies as these, will be liable to sway the
judgment of an indifferent considering man ; and I doubt
not but that he who will thoroughly weigh with himself
these particulars that are here propounded, may find some
satisfaction for these arguments, which are taken from the
seeming novelty and singularity of this opinion.
^■
THAT THE £ART& MAY BE A PLANET. 149
PROP. II.
That there is not any place in scriptures^/rmn which f being
rightly understood) we may infer the diurnal motion of
the sun or heavens^
IT were happy for us, if we could exempt scripture from,
philosophical controversies : if we could be content to
let it be perfect for that end unto which it was intended, for
a rule of our faith and obedience ; and not stretch it also to
be a judge of such natural truths as are to be found out by
our own industry and experience. Though the Holy Ghost
could easily have given us a full resolution of all such parti-
culars; yet he hath left this travel to the sons of men to be
exercised therewith* : mundum reliquit disputationibus ho-
minum: that being busied for the most part In an inquisi-
tion after the; creatures, we might find the less leisure to
wait upon our lusts, or serve our more sinful inclinations.
But however, because our adversaries generally do so
much insult in those arguments that may be drawn from
hence ; and more especially, because Pinedaf doth for this
reason with so many bitter and empty reproaches, revile
our learned countryipan, Dr. Gilbert; in that renewing of
this opinion, he omitted an answer to the scripture expres-
sions : therefore it is requisite, that in the prosecution of
this discourse, we should lay down such satisfaction as may
clear all doubts that may be taken thence: especially since
the prejudice that may arise from the misapprehension of
thpse scriptqre phrases, may much disable the reader fronx
looking on any other argument with an equal and indiffer-
ent mind.
The places that seem to oppose this, are of two kind$.
First, such as imply a motion in the heavens : or, secondly,
iSucU as seem to express a rest and immobility in the earth.
* Kccles, iii. 10j( 1 1 • f Comment, in ^cles. cb^ i. ver. ^k
\
i
150 THAT THE SAHTH MAY BE A PLANET.
Those of the first kind seem to bear in them the clearest
evidence, and therefore are more insisted on by our adver-
saries. They may be referred unto these three heads.
1. All those scriptures where there is any mention made
of the rising or setting of the sun or stars.
2. That story in Joshua, where the sun standing still is
reckoned for a miracle.
3. That other wonder in the days of Hezekiah, whenthe
sun went back ten degrees in the dial of Ahaz. All which
places do seem to conclude, that tlie diurnal motion is caused
by the heavens.
To this I answer in general;
That the Holy Ghost in these scripture expressions, is
pleased to accommodate himself unto the conceit of the
vulgar, and the usual opinion : whereas, if in the more
proper phrase it had been said, that the earth did rise and
set ; or, that the earth stood still, &c. the people who had
been unacquainted with that secret in philosophy, would
not have understood the meaning of it; and tiierefore it
was convenient that they should be spoken unto in their
own language.
Ay, but you will reply, it should seem more likely, if
there had been any such thing, that the Holy Ghost should
use the truest expressions : for then he would at the same
time have informed them of the thing, and reformed them
in an error : since his authority alone had been sufficient to
have rectified the mistake.
I answer:
1 . Though it were, yet it is beside the chief scope of
those places, to instruct us in any philosophical points, as
hath been proved in the former book; especially when
these things are neither necessary in themselves, nor do
necessarily induce to a more full understanding of that
which is the main business of those scriptures. But now
the people might better conceive the meaning of the Holy
Ghost, when he does conform himself unto their capacities
and opinions, than when he talks exactly of things in such
a proper phrase as is beyond their reach : and therefore it
\.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 151
is said in Isaiah, I am the Lord which teache^ thee utilia^
profitable things : where the Gloss has it, non subtilia^ not
such curiosities of nature as are not easily apprehended.
2. It is not only besides that which is the chief purpose
of those places, but it might happen also to be somewhat
opposite unto it. For men being naturally unapt to believe
any thing that seems contrary to their senses, might upon
this begin to question the authority of that book which af-
firmed it, or at least to retch scripture some wrong way, to
force it to some other sense, which might be more agree-
able to their own false imagination. Tertullian* tells us
of some heretics, who when they were plainly confuted
out of any scripture, would presently accuse those texts or
books to be fallible, and of no authority ; and rather yield
scripture to be erroneous, than forego those tenets for which
they thought there was so good reason. So likewise might
it have been in these points which seem to bear in them so
much contradiction to the senses and common opinion :
and therefore it is excellent advice set down by St. Austinf*
2tAod nihil credere de re obscurd temere debemust ne/ort^
qu/)d posted Veritas pate/eceritf quamvis libris Sanctis sive
testamentiveteriSi sioe novi^ nulla mode esse possit adversum^
tamen propter amarem nostri erroris oderimus: that we
should not hastily settle our opinions concerning any ob-
scure matter, lest afterwards, the truth being discovered,,
(which, however it may seem, cannot be repugnant to any
thing in scripture) we should hate that, out of love to the
error that we have before entertained* A little rcwding
may inform us how those texts have been abused to strange
and unmeant ^legories, which have mentioned any natural
truth in such a manner as was not agreeable to men's con-
ceits. And besides, if the Holy Ghost had propounded unta
us any secrets in philosophy, we should have been apt to
be so busied about them, as to neglect other matters of
greater importance. And therefore St. Austin^ proposing
the question, what should be the reason, why the scripture
* PneKopt. c. 17. f In Gene*, ad Ik. 1. 2. in Gpe^ % Ibid. cap. Uc^
1
f '
152 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAN£T«
does not clearly set down any thing concerning the naturet
figure, magnitude and motion of the heavenly orbs ; he an-?
swers it thus: the Holy Ghost being to deliver more neces^
sary truths, would not insert these, lest men, according to the
pravity of their dispositions, should neglect the more
weighty matters, and bestow their thoughts about the spe-r
culative natural points, which were less needful. So that
it might seem more convenient that the scripture should
not meddle with the revealing of these unlikely secrets^
especially when it is to deliver unto us many other myste-f
ries.ofgreater necessity, which seem to be directly opposite
to our sense and reason. And therefore, I say, the Holy
Ghost might purposely omit the treating of these philoso*
phical secrets, tiij time and future discovery might with lei«
sure settle them in the opinion of others: as he is pleased
in other things of a higher kind, to apply himself unto the
infirmity of our apprehensions, by being represented* as if
he were a human nature, with the parts and passions of a
man. So in these things like^e, that he might descend
to our capacities, does he vouchsafe to conform his expres-
sions unto the error and nqlstake of our judgments.
But before we come to a further illustration, let us a little
examine those particular scriptures which are commonly
urged to prove the motion of the sun or heavens. These
(as was said) might be distributed under these three heads.
1. Those places which mention the rising or setting of
the sun ; as that in the psalm*. The sun like a bridegroom
Cometh out of his chamber^ and rejoiceth as a giant to run
his race : his going forth is from the end of heaven^ and his
circuit unto the end of it^ and there is nothing hid from the
heat thereof. And that in Ecclesiastest, The sun ariseth^
and the suyi goeth down, &c.
In which scriptures we may observe divers phrases that
are evidently spoken in reference to the appearance of
|;hiqg$, and the false opinion of the vulgar. And therefore
4t i$ not altogether unlikely, that this, which they seem t^
* Psal. j^.5,6. t i;ccleu i. 5^
tHAT THE EARTH 4^ AY BE A PLANET. 15S
affirm concerning the motion of the heavens, should also
be understood in the same sense.
The sun like a bridegroom cometh out of his chamber;
alluding perhaps unto the conceit of ignorant people : as if
it took rest all the while it was absent from us, and came
out of its chamber when it arose.
And rejoiceth as a giant to run his race; because in the
morning it appears bigger than at other times j and there-
fore in reference to this appearance, may then be compared
unto a giant.
His going forth is from the end of heaven, and his dr^
cuit unto the ends of it. Alluding again unto the opinion
of the vulgar: who not apprehending the roundness of the
heavens, do conceive it to have two ends, one where the
sun riseth, the other where it setteth.
And there is nothing hid from the heat thereof; speak-
ing still in reference to the common mistake, as if the sun
were actually hot in itself; and as if the heat of the weather
were not generated by reflection, but did inunediately pro-
ceed from the body of the sun.
So likewise, for that in Ecckwstes, where it is said, tht
sun risethy and the sun goeih dewn^ &c. which phrases
being properly understood, do import that he is sometimes,
in a higher place than at others : whereas, in a circumfe-
rence, there is no place higher or lower, each part being at
the same distance from the centre, which is the bottom.
But now understand the phrase In reference to the sun's
appearance, and then we grant that he does seem some-
times to rise, and sometimes to go down, because in refe-
rence to the horizon, (which common people apprehend to
be the bottom, and in the utmost bounds of it to join witK
the heavens,) the sun does appear in the morning to rise up
from it, and in the evening to go down unto it. Now, I say,
beicause the Holy Ghost, in the manner of these expressions,
does so plainly allude unto vulgar errors, and the false ap-
pearance of things; therefore it is not without probability,
that he should be interpreted in the same sense, when he
f C?ni3 to imply a motion in the sun or heavens.
;
H
154 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET*.
2. The second place was that relation in Joshua ; where
it is mentioned as a miracle, that the sun did stand still.
And Joshua said*, Sun^ stand thou still upon Gibeon, and
thou moon in the valley of Ajalon, So the sun stood still
in the midst of heaven^ and hasted not to go down about a
whole day. And there was no day like that^ before it^ or
after jt. In which place likewise th^re are divers phrases
wherein the Holy Ghost does not express things according
to their true nature, and as they are in themselves ; but ac-
cording to their appearances, and as they are conceived in
common opinioti. As,
1. When he says, Sun^ stand thou still upon Gibeon^ or
aver Gibeon, Now the whole earth being so little in com-
parison to the body of the sun, and but as a point, in re-
spect of that orb wherein the sun is supposed to move ; and
Gibeon being, as it were, but a point of this globe of earth ;
therefore the words cannot be understood properly, but
according to appearance. It is probable that Joshua was
then at Azecha, a little east from Gibeon, and the sun be-
ing somewhat beyond the meridian, did seem unto him as
he was in that place, to be over against Gibeon ; and in re-
ference to this appearance, and vulgar conceit, does he
command it to stand still upon thatplacef.
2. And so secondly for that other expression; and thou
moon in the valley of Ajalon, This planet was now a
little east from the sun, it being about three or four days
old (as commentators! guess.) Ajalon was three miles
from Gibeon eastward, and Joshua commanded the moon.
to stand still there ; because unto him it did then seem to
be over against that valley ; whereas^ it is certain, if he had
been there himself, it would still have seemed to be as
much distant from him. Just as men commonly speak in.
shewing another the stars: we point to a star over such a
chimney, or such a tree, because to us it appears so;
* Jos. X. 12, 14. Gaiilaeus maintains the literal sense of this place,
towards the end of that treatise, which he calls, Nov. Antiq. pat. doctrina.
t Tostat. in locum> quaest. 1^, 17. Anus Montanusin locum.
{ Tostat. ib. quaest. 18. Serrarius in Josh. 10. quaest. 21 ,22.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 155
whereas the star in itself is not sensibly mo^e over them,
than it is oyer us. So that in this phrase likewise the Holy
Ghost doth conform himself unto the appearance of things,
^nd our grosser conceit.
3. And the sun stood still in the midst of heaven. Now
to speak properly, and as the thing is in itself, heaven has
no midst but the centre ; and therefore this also must be
interpreted in reference to the opinion of the vulgar ; and
by the midst of heaven, we are to understand such a place .
as was not very near to either of the ends, the east or west,
4. And there was no day like that^ before ity or after it :
which words are not to be understood absolutely, for there
are always longer days under the poles ; but in respect to
the opinion of the vulgar; that is, there was never any
day so long which these ignorant people knew of.
3. As for this last place concerning the sun's returning
ten degrees in the dial of Ahaz* : I think it may probably
be affirmed, that it is to be understood only concerning the
shadow : which though it do necessarily happen in all hori-
zontal dials, for any latitude betwixt the tropics : and so
consequently in all declining dials, the elevation of whose
pole is less than the sun's greatest declination ; as Clavius
de Horol. cap. 21. observes: yet the circumstances of this
relation in scripture, make' the event to differ from that
other which is common and natural : which against its na-
ture did seem to go backwards, when as the sun itself was
not in the least manner altered from its usual course. Of
this opinion were Abarbinel, Arius Montanus, Burgensis,
Vatablas Sanctius, &c.
The reasons for it may be these ;
1. The miracle is proposed only concerning the shadow ;
Wilt thou that the shadow shall ascend or return by itn de-
grees ? there being not in the offer of this wonder, any the
least mention made concerning the sun's going backwards.
2. It is likely we should have had some intimation con-
i;:erning the extraordinary length of the day, as it is in that
* 2 iCings XX. 1 1 . Isa. xxxviiL 8.
i
156 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
of Joshua; but in this relation, the chief matter that the
story takes notice of, is the alteration of the shadow.
3. Had it been by the supposed return of the sun's body,
this had been a greater miracle than those which were per*
formed upon more solemn occasions; it had been more
wonderful than its seeming rest in Joshua's time ; than the
supernatural eclipse at our Saviour's death, when the moon
was in the full. And then it is not likely, that the Holy
Ghost in relating of this miracle, should chiefly insist in ex-
pressing how the shadow returned, and that only ia the dial
of Ahaz.
4. This sign did not appear in the sun itself; because in
the 2 Chron. xxxii. 31. it is said, that the ambassadors of
the king of Babylon did come unto Hezekiah, to enquire of
the wonder that was done in the Lord ; and therefore it
seems the miracle did not consist in any change of the
heavens,
5. If it had been in the sun, it would have been as well
discerned in other parts of the world, as in the land of Judea.
And then,
1. What need the king of Babylon send thither to en*
quire after it ? If you reply, because it was occasioned by
Hezekiah's recovery; I answer, it is not likely that the
heathens v/ould ever believe so great a miracle should be
wrought merely for a sign of one man's recovery from a
disease : but would rather be apt to think that it was done
for some more remarkable purpose, and that by some of
their own gods, unto whom they attributed a far greater
power than unto any other. It is more probable, they
might hear some flying rumour of a miracle that was seen
in Judea: which because it happened only in Hezekiah's
house and dial, and that too upon his recovery from a dan-^
gerous sickness, they might be more apt to believe that i^
was a sign of it.
2. Why have we no mention made of it in the writings
of the ancients? It is no way likely, that so great a miracle
as this was (if it were in the sun) should have been passed
over in silence ; especially, since it happened in those later
THAT THE EARTH MAY !BE A PLANET, 15T
times, when there were many heathen writers that flou-
rished in the world; Hesiod, Archilochus, Symonides;
and not loiig after. Homer, with divers others ; and yet
none of them have the least mention of any such Jli'odigy.
We haVe many relations of matters that were less observ-
able, which were done about that time; the history of
Numa Pompilius, Gyges; the fight betwixt the three bre-
thren, with divers such stories. And it is scarce crediblcy .
that this should have been omitted amongst the rest.
Nay, we have (as many guess) some hints from profane
antiquity, of the miracle wrought by Joshua. Unto which,
it is thought the ancients did allude in the fable of Phaeton;
when the sun was so irregular in his course, that he burnt'
some part of the world. And questionless then, this which
happened in later times, would not have been so wholly ^
forgotten. It is an argument urged by Origen*, that the
eclipse at our Saviour's passion was not universal, because
no profane author of those times mentions it. Which
consequence js the very same with that which Is urged in
this other case ; but by the way, his antecedent was false,
since TertuUianf affirms, that it was recorded amongst the
Roman annals.
Now as for that story in Herodotus:]:, where after he had
related the flight of Senacherib, he tells us, how the sun did
four times in the space of 10340 years invert his course, and
rise in the west; which would seem so unto other nations,
if he had only returned, as many conclude, from this scrip-
ture : as for this story, (I say) it cannot well be ui^ed as
pertinent to the present business, because it seems to have
reference unto times that never were.
So that all these things being well considered, we shall
find it more probable, that this miracle doth consist in th^
return of the shadow. ,
. If you object, that the scripture does expressly say, the
sun itself returned ten degrees || ; I answer, it is a frequent
* Tractat. 35. in Mat. f Apologet. c. 21.
I Lib. 2. II Isa. xxxviii. 8.
\
M
158 THAT THE EARTH MAV BE A PLANtT.
manner of speech in scripture, to put the cause for the e&
feet; as that in Jonas^, where it is said, that the sun did
beat upon the head of Jonas ^ that is, the beams of the sun.
So that of the Psalmistf, the sun shall not smite thee by
day, diat is, the heat which proceeds from the sun's refleC'^
lion. In the same sense may the phrase be understood in
this place ; and the sun may be said to return back, becau^
the light, which is the effect of it, did seem to do so ; or
rather, because the shadow, which is the effect of that, did
, change its course.
This later scripture then, will not at all make to the pre-
sent purpose : as for those of the two former kinds, I have
already answered, that they are spoken in reference to the
appearance of things, and vulgar opinion. For the further
illustration of which, I shall endeavour to confirm these two
particulars.
1. That the Holy Ghost in many other places of scrip-
ture, does accommodate his expressions unto the error of
our conceits: and does not speak of divers things as they
are in themselves, but as they appear unto us. Therefore
it is not unlikely, that these phrases also may be liable unto
the same interpretation.
2, That divers men have fallen into great absurdities,
whilst they have looked for the grounds of philosophy
^» from the words of scripture ; and therefore it may be dan-
gerous in this point also, to adhere so closely unto the letter
of the text. .
* Jonah iv. 8. f Psalm cxxi, 6.
. ^
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 159
PROP. III.
That the Holy Ghosts in many places of scripture, does
plainly conform his expressions unto the errors of our con*
ceits; and does not speak of divers things as they are in
themselves, but as they appear unto us.
THERE is not any particular by which philosophy hath
been moreendamaged, than the ignorant superstition
of some meii: who in stating the controversies of it, do so
closely adhere unto the mere words of scripture. 2uam
plurima occurrunt in libris sacris ad naturam pertinentia,
&c. They are the words of Vallesius* " There are sun-
** dry things in holy writ concerning natui*al points, which
*' most men think are not so to be understood, as if the
*^ Holy Ghost did intend to unfold unto us any thing in
that kind : but referring all to the salvation of our souls,
does speak of other matters according to common opi«
** nion." And a little after, Ego^ divina hac eloquia, &C4
** I for my part am persuaded, that these divine treatisei
** were not written by the holy and inspired penmen, for
the interpretation of philosophy, because God left such
things to be found out by men's labour and industry*
But yet whatsoever is in them concerning nature is most
true : as proceeding from the God of nature, from whom
nothing could be hid." And questionless, all those
things which the scripture does deliver concerning any na-
tural point, cannot be but certain and infallible, being under-^
stood in that sense, wherein they were first intended ; but
now that it does speak sometimes according to common
opinion, rather than the true nature of the things them-
selves, was intimated before ; wherefore (by the way) Fro-
mondusf his triumph upon the latter part of this quotation,
is but vain, and to no purpose. It is a good rule set down
* Prooem. ad Phil, sacram. t Vest, tract. 3. c. Z,
it
t'»-
im
160 t'rtAT th£ earth may 6t A MAMKYt
by a learned commentator*, to be observed in the int^f*-
pretation of scripture: scriptura sacra sape nan tarn ad
veritatem ipsam, quam ad h&minum opinionem^ sermonent
accommodat; that it does many times accommodite its ex-
pressions, not so much to the truth itsdf, as to men's opi-^
nions. And in tliis sense is that speech of Gregory Con-
cerning images and pictures, attributed by Calvin f unto the
history of the creation t viz. librum esse ideotarum^ that it is
a book for the simpler and ignorant people. For it being
written to infotm them, as well as others, it is requisite that
it should use the most plain and easy expressions. To thisr
purpose likewise is that of Mersennus Xj mille sunt scriptura
hca &c. *♦ There are very many places of scripture, which
** are not to be interpreted according to the letter ; and
<^ that for this reason, because God would apply himself
'* unto our capacity and sense || :" presertim in iis^ fiue ad
res naiuraleSf oculisque subjectas pertinent ; . more especially
in those things which concern nature, and are subject to
our eyes. And therefore in the very same place, though
he be eager enough against Copernicus, yet he concludes,
that opinion not to be a heresy ^ because (saith he) those
scriptures which seem to oppose it, are not so evident, but
tliat they may be capable of another interpretation : inti-*-
mating, that it was not unlikely they should be understood
in reference to outward appearance and common opinion ;
and that this manner of speech is frequently used in many
other places of scripture^ may be easily manifest from these
following examples.
Thus though the moon may be proved by infallible ob-»
servations, to be less than any of the visible stars ; y6t be-
cause of its appearanccy and vulgar opinion, therefore doth
the scripture in comparison to them, call it. one of the great
i^hts. Of which place, saith Calvin §, Moses popular Her
scripsity nos potiiis respexit quam sydera, Moses did not
* Sanctius in Isa. xm» 5, Item in Zachar. 1. 9. n. 45.
\ Comment, in Gen. c. i. | In Gen. cap. i. ver. 10. art. 6v
II Vid. Hiero. in Jer. 28. Aquinas in Job xxvi. 7.
§ Gen. i. IG. Fsal. cxxxvi. 7.
ti
ti
THAT,,.THE 3EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 161
SO much regard the nature of the thing, as our capacity;
and therefore uses a popular phrase : so as ordinary people
without the help of artis and learning, might easily under-
istand hina ; arid in another plabe, jton fmt spiritvi^ sancti
concilium ^strologiam docere*: ** It was not the purpose
of the Holy Ghost to teach us astronomy: but being tp
propound a doctrine that concerns the most rude and
simple people, he does (both by Moses and the prophets)
** conform himself unto their phrases and conceits: lest
*' any should think to excuse his own ignorance with the
** pretence of difficulty: as men commonly do in those
things which are deUvered after a learned and sublime
manner*" Thus Zanchy f likewise, Moses majorem ra^
iionem habmt nostri humanique judidi, &c. " Vif hen Moses
** calls the moon a great light, he had a more especial refe-
" rcnce to men's opinioiiis of it, than to the truth of the
" thing itself; . because he was to deal with sucli, who do
** usually judge rather By their sense than by their reason?'
Nor will that distinction of Fromondus and others avoid
this interpretation, when he tells iis oiF magnum materiale,
which refers to the bulk and quantity of the body; and
magnvm fcrmale^ which imports the greatness of its light.
For we grant, that it is really unto us jx greater light than
any of the stars, or than all of them together: yet there is
not one of them, but is in itself a bigger light than this:
and therefore when we say this speech is to be understood
according to its appearance, we do not oppose this to rca-
lity : but it is im|>lied, that this reality is not absolute, and
in the nature of the thing itself; but only relative, and in
reference, to us, I may say a candle is a bigger light than a
star, or the moon, because it is really so to me. However
any one will think this to be spoken^ only in relation to its
appearance, and not to be understood as if the thing were
so in itself. But (by the way) it does concern Fromondus J
to maintain tlie scripture's authority, in revealing of natural
* Comment, ^in Psal. cxxxvi. f De Open Dei. par. !?. 1. 6. c. L
% De Meteor. 1. 4. c. 2. art. 5.
VOL. \, Jfi,
i
162 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
secrets; because, from thence it is that he fetches the chief
argument for that strange astertion of his, concerning the
heaviness of the wind ; where Job says*^ that Grod makes
the weight for the wind. Thus likewise, because the com-
mon people usually think the rain to proceed from some
waters in the expansum, therefore doth Moses in reference
to this erroneous conceit, tell us of waters above the firma-
ment, and the windows of heaven : of which saith Calvin t>
nimis servilitei' litera s^ astringunty &c. " Such men too
" servilely tie themselves unto the letter of the text, who
" hence conclude, that thiere is a sea in the heavens; when
" as we know that Moses and the prophets, to accommo-
" date themselves unto the capacity of ruder people, da
** use a vulgar expression ; and therefore it would be a
preposterous course, to reduce their phrases unto the
exact rules of philosophy." Let me add, that from this
mistake, it is likely did arise that groundless observation of
the ancient Jews, who would not admit any to read the be«
ginning of Genesis, till he was arrived t© thirty years of age.
The true reason of which was tliis : not because that book
was harder than any other, but because Moses conforming
his expression to vulgar conceits, and they examining of
them by more ekact rules of philosophy, were fain to force
upon them many strange allegories, and unnatural myste-
ries.
Thus alsa, because for the most part we conceive the
stars to be innumerable, therefore doth the Holy Ghost
often speak of them in reference to this opinion. So Jere-
my J, as the host of heaven cannot be numbered, neither
the sand of the sea measured, so will I multiply the seed of
David. So likewise, when God would comfort Abraham
with the promise of a numberless posterity, he bids him
look up to heaven, and tells him, that his seed should be
like those stars for number || ; which, saith Ciavius§, intclT.
ligendum est secundum communem sententiavi vulgi, exisH-
* Job xxviii. 25. f Comment, in Ps. cxlviii. 4. $ Jer. xxxv. 22.
II Gen. XV. 5. § In 1 cap. Sphaers.
tHAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 163
mantis infinitam esse multitudinem stellarum^ dum easnocte
Serena confuse intuetur, is to be understood according to
the common opinion of the vulgar, who think the stars to
be of an infinite multitude, whilst they behold them all (as
they seem confused) in a clear night. And though many
/ of our divines do commonly interpret this speech to be a
hyperbole ; yet being well considered, ^e shall find that
Abraham's posterity, in some few generations, were far
more than there are visible stars in the firmament ; and of
such only does God speak, because he bids Abraham look
up to the heavens.
Now all these, even unto six differences of magnitude, are
reckoned to be but 1022. True indeed, at the first viewing
of the heavens, it may seem an incredible thing that tliey
should be of no greater a number; but the reason of this
is, because tliey appear scattered and confused, so that the
eye cannot place them in any such order, as to reckon them
up, or take any distinct survey of them. Now it is a known
truth, qujod fortius operatur pluralitas partiumy ubi ordo
abest ; nam inducit similitudinem iiifiniti^ et impedit com"
prehensionem * ; that a plurality of parts without order, has
a more strong operation, because it has ^ kind of seeming
infinity, and so hinders comprehension. And then besides,
there are more appearances of stars many times, than there
are bodies of them : for the eye, by reason of its weakness
and disability to discern any thing at so great a distance ; as
also, because of those beams which proceed from such re-
mote bodies in a twinkling and wavering manner, and so
mix and confound themselves at their entrance into that
organ; it must needs receive imore representations than
there are true bodies. But now, if a man do but leisurely
and distinctly compare the stars of the heaven with those
of this number that are noted in a celestial globe, he shall
scarce find any in the sky which are not marked ffith the
globe; nay, he may observe many in the globe, which he
can scarce at ali^^iscern in the heavens. -
* Sir Fr. Bac. Table of Coloun, No. 5.
M 2
•s.
164 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
Now this number of the stars is commonly distributed
into 48 constellations; in each of which, though we should
suppose ten thousand stars, (which can scarce be conceived)
yet would not all this number equal that of the children of
Israel Nay, it is the assertion of Clavius *, that Abraham's
posterity in some few generations were far more than there
could be stars in the firmament, though they stuck so close
that they touched one another. And he proves it thus: a
great circle in the firmament does contain the diameter of
a star of the first magnitude 14960 times. In the diameter
of the firmament, there are contained 4760 diameters of
such a star : now if we multiply this circumference by this
diameter, the product will be 71209600, which is the full
number of stars, that the eighth sphere (according to Pto-
lemy's grounds) would contain, if they stood so close that
they touched one another.
The children oi Israel were reckoned at their going out
of Egypt 603550 1, of such as were one and twenty years
old and upwards, and were able to go to war; besides chil-
dren, and women, and youths, and old men, and the Le-
vites; which in probability, did always treble the other
number. Now if they were sp many at one time, we may
well conceive that in all those several generations, both be*
fore and since, the number was much augmented ; and long
before this time, did far exceed this supposed multitude of
the stars. From all which, we may infer, that the scripture
expressions in this kind, are to be understood according to
appearance and common opinion.
Another place usually cited for the same purpose, to
shew that the Holy Ghost does not speak exactly concern-
ing natural secrets, is that in the Kings and Chronicles X^
which relates unto us the measure of Solomon's brazen sea,
whose diameter was ten cubits, and its circumference thirty ;
wherdlis to speak geometrically, the more exact proportion
betwixt the diameter and tlie circumference, is not as ten
to thirty, but rather as seven to.twenty-two.
* In prim. ca. Sphaerae. f Num. i. 46. *
X 1 King, vii, 23. 2 Chr. iv. 2
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. . 165
But against this it is objected ^ by our adversaries,
1. This sea was not perfectly round, but rather inclining
to a semicircular forrti, as Josephus* affirms.
I reply : if it were so, yet this is so much /rom helping
the matter, that it makes it much worse j for then the dis-
proportion will be far greater.
But secondly, scripture, which is to be believed before
Josephus, does tell us in express terms, that it was round
all about, 1 Kings vii. 23.
2. The proportion of the diameter to the circumference,
is not exactly the same as seven to two and twenty, but
rather less\ I answer, though it be, yet it is nearer unto
that, than any other number.
3. The scripture does but, according to its usual custom,
suppress the less number, and mention only that which is
bigger and more full*. So in some places% Abraham's poste-
rity is said to remain in the land of Egypt for four hundred
years; when as notwithstanding, other scriptures tell us%
that they tarried there thirty years longer. Thus likewise
in one place \ the number of Jacob's house who came
into Egypt, is reckoned to be seventy ; whereas else-
where ® they are said to be seventy-five.
I answer: all this is so far from destroying the force of
the present argument, that it does rather, confirm it, and
more clearly evidence unto us, that the scripture does not
only, not speak exactly in these subtle and more secret
points of philosophy; but also, in the ordinary obvious
numbering of things, does conform unto common custom,
and often use the round number for the whole.
4. It is yet objected by another adversary ^ that we
have no reason to expect the Holy Ghost should reve&l
unto us this secret in nature ; becauie neither Archimedes,
nor any other, had then found it out. I reply, and why
then should we think that the scripture must needs jpfonn
* "Ross. 1. 1. sect. 1. c. 8, * Antiq. Jud. lib. 8. cap. 2.
^ Ross. ibid. * Ibid. ^ Gen. xv. 15. Acts, vii. 5*
« Exod. xii. 41. Gal iii. 17. '^ Gen. xlvi. 27.
•Acts. vii. 4. * Fromond. Yesta 4. tract. 3< c. ?<,
i
166 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
US of the earth's motion ; when as neither Pythagoras, nor
Copfernicus, nor any else, had then discovered it ?
5. In taking the compass of this vessel, they measured
somewhat below the brim, where it was nanower than at
the top, and so the circumference there might be exactly
but thirty cubits : whereof its diameter was ten*.
I answer : it is evident this is a mere shift, there being
not the least ground for it in the text. And then besides,
why might not we affirm, that the diameter w^s measure4
from that place, as well as the circumference ? since it is
very probable that the Holy Ghost did speak ad idenh and
not tell us the breadth of one place, and the compass of
another. So that all our adversaries evasions cannot well
avoid the force of the argument that is taken from this
scripture.
Again, common people usually conceive the earth to be
such a plain, as in its utmost parts is terminated by the
heavens, so that if a man were in the farthermost coasts of
it, he might touch the sky. And hence also, they thinly
that the reason why some countries are hotter than others,^
is, because they lie nearer unto the sun. Nay, Strabo tells
us of some philosophers too, who in this point have grossly
erred ; affirming, that there was a place towards the utr
most coasts of Lusitania, where a man might hear th€
noise that the sun made, as he quenched his beams in his.
descent to the ocean ; which, though it be an absurd mis-
take, yet we may note, that the Holy Ghost in the ex-
pression of these tilings, is pleased to conform himself unto
such kind of vulgar and false conceits ; and therefore often
speaks of the ends of heaven t> and the ends of the
world J. In this sense, they that come from any far country
are said to come from the end of heaven, Isaiah xiii. 5.
And in another place, from the side of the heavens, Deut.
iv. 32. All which phrases do plainly allude unto the error
of vulgar capacities (saith Sanctius§) which hereby is better
instructed, than it woul^ be by more proper expressions.
* Fromond. Vesta. 4, tract. 3. c. 2. f Ps.xix. 6. Mat. xxhr. 31.
X Vs. xxii. xxviL &c. § Comment, in Isa.xiii. 5.
f
•THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 167
Thus likewise, because ignorant people cjannot well ap-
prehend how so great a weight as the sea and land should
hang alone in the open air, without being founded upon
some basis to uphold it ; therefore in this respect also does
scripture apply itself unto their conceits, where it often
mentions the foundations of the earth*. Which phrase,
in the letter of it, does manifestly allude unto men's ima-
ginations in this kind.
Thus also the common people usually Conceive the
earth to be upon the water ; because, when they have tra-
velled any way as far as they can, they are at length
stopped by the sea. Therefore doth scripture in reference
to this, afiirmt, that God stretched the earth upon the wa-
ters, founded the earth upon the seas, and established it
upon the floods. Of which places saith Calvin, Non dispu-
tat philoscphke David, de ten^te situ ; sed popularitdr lo'
jguevSf ad rudium captum s^ accommodat : It was not Da-
vid's intent to speak philosophically concerning the earth's
situation ; but rather by using a popular phrase, to accom-
modate liis speech unto the capacities of the ruder people.
In this sense likewise, are we to understand all those
places of scripture, wherein the coasts of heaven are de-
nominated from the relations of before, behind, the right
hand, or the left. Which do not imply, saith Scaliger J,
any absolute difference in such places, but are spoken
merely in reference to men's estimations, and the common
opinion of those people for whom tlie scriptures were first
penned. Thus because it was the opinion of the Jewish
rabbles, that man was created with his face to the east,
therefore the Hebrew word QTp signifiess^w/^, or the
east ; iin** posty or the west ; |»Q> dextrui or the south ;
h^Oii sinistra^ or the north. You may see all of them
put together in that place of Job § : Behold I go forward,
and he is not^ there, and backward, but I cannot perceive
him ; on the left hand, where he doth work, but I cannot
* Job. xxxviii. 4. Ps. cii. 25. + Ps. cxxxvi. 6. xxiv. 2.
} Subtil. Exercit. 67* § Job xxiii. 8. 9.
16S THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET-
|)chpld him. He hideth himself on the right hand, that X
cannot see him. Which expressions are by some inter-
preters referred unto the four coasts of heaven, according
to the common use of those original words. From hence
it is, that many of the ancients have concluded hell to be
in the north, which is signified by the left hand : untp
which side our Saviour tells us, that the goats shall be di-
vided *. Which opinion likewige seems to be favoured
by that plac^ in Job t> where it is said, hell is naked be-
fore God, and desti^uction hath no covering. And pre-
sently is added, he stretched out the north over the empty
place.
Upon these grounds, St. Jerom interprets that speech of
the preacher, Eccles. xi. 3. If the tree falls towards the
south, or towards the north, in the place where the tree
falleth, there shall it be. Concerning those who shall go
cither to heaven or hell. And in this sensjs also do some
* expound that of Zachary, xiv. 4, where it is said, that
the Mount of Qlives shall cleave in the midst ; half of it
shall remove towards the north, and half of it towards the
south. By which is intimated, that amongst those Gen-
tiles who shall take upon them the profession of Christ,
there are two sorts ; some that go to the north, that js, to
hell, and others to the south, that is to heaven. And
therefore it is (say they) that God so often threatens evil
out of the north ; and upon this ground it is (saith Besol-
dus§) that there is no religion that worships that way. We
read of the Mahometans, that they adore towards the
south ; the Jews towards the west ; Christiaxis towards the
east, but none to the north.
But of this only by the way. However, certain it ^
that the Holy Ghost does frequently in scripture set forth
the several coasts of heaven, by those relative terms of
right hand and left hand, &c. which expressions do not de-
note any real intrinsical difference betwixt those places.
# Mat. XXV. 33. f Job xxxvi. 6, 7.
t Jer. i. 14^ 15. Item cap. iv. 6. vi. 1. § L. de nat. pop. €• 4<
tHAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET, 169
^ut are rather fitted for the apprehension of those men,
from whose fancy it is that they have such denominations.
And though Aristotle * concludes these several positions to
be natural unto the heavens ; yet his authority in this parr
ticular is not available, because he delivers it upon a wrong
ground, supposing the orbs to be living creatures, and as-
sisted with intelligences. We may observe, that the
meaning of these coasts by the relations of right hand and
left hand, &c. is so far from having any ground in the na-.
ture of those several places, ' that these relations are not
only variously applied unto them by divers religions (as
was said before,) but also by divers arts and professions.
Thus because astronomers make their observations to-
ward the south parts of the horizon, where there be most
stars that rise an^ set^ therefore do they account the west
to be at their right hand, and tlie ea$t at their left The
cosmographers in taking the latitude oJF places^ and reckon*
ing their several climates niust Iqok ^owa|fds the north
pole ; and therefore in their phrase, ^y the right hand is
meant the east , and by the left hand, the west: and thus
(saith Plutarch t) a e we to understand these expressions
in Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle. The poets count th^
south to be towards the left, and the north the right hand,
Thus Lucan | speaking of the Ai^abians coming unto Thes*?
• galy says ;
Ignotum whis Arabes venistis in orbem:
Umbras mirati nemorum^ non ire sinisiras.
The augurs taking their observations at the east, count
the south to be at their right hand, and the north their
left: so that these denominations have not any real ground
in the nature of the things, but are imposed upon them by
the scripture phrase, in reference to the account and opi«
nion of the Jews.
Thus also, because heretofore it was generally received,
that the heart was the principal seat of the faculties§ ; there*'
* De CobL I. 2. c. 2. t l^e plac. Philosoph. 1. 2, c. 10.
t lib. 3. § D. Hakwel, Apol. 1. 1. c. 1. sect. 2*
170 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
fore doth the spirit apply himself unto this common te*
nent; and In many places, attributes wisdom and under-
standing to the heart *. Whereas, to speak properly, the
reason and discursive faculties have their principal resi-
dence in the head (saith Galen and Hippocrates, together
with the generality of our later physicians,) because they
are hindered in their operations by the distempers of that
part, and recovered by medicines applied unto it.
So likewise are we to understand those other places, Isa.
lix. 5. where some translations read it, ova aspidum rupc"
runtf they have broken the vipers eggs ; alluding to that
common but fabulous story of the vipei^ who breaks his
passage through the bowels of the female. So Psal. Iviii.
4^ 5. where the prophet speaks of the deaf adder, that stops
her ears against the voice of the charmer. Both which re-
lations (if we may believe many naturalists) are as false as
they are common ; and yet because they were entertained
with the general opinion of those days, therefore doth the
Holy Ghost vouchsafe to allude unto them in holy writ. It
is a plain mistake of Fromondus f, when in answer to these
places, he is fain to say, that they are used proverbially
only, and do not positively conclude any thing. For when
David writes these words, that they are like the deaf adder
which stoppeth her ears, &c. this affirmation is manifestly
implied, that the deaf adder does stop her ears against the
voice of the charmer : which because it is not true in the
letter of it, (as was said before) therefore it is very probable
that it should be interpreted in the same sense wherein here
it is cited.
In reference to thb also, we are to conceive of those
other expressions; Cold cometh out of the north; Job
xxxvii. 9. and again, Fair weather comes out of the north,
ver. 22. So ver. 11. Thy garments are quieted when he
warmeth the earth by the south wind. And Prov. xxv. 23.
The north wind driveth away rain. Which phrases do not
* Prdv. viij. 5. z. 8. Eccles. i. 13, 16, 17. and viii. 5.
f Vesta Trac. 3. cap. 3.
THAT THK EARTH MAY BE A PLANET, Ml
contain in them any absolute general truth, but can so far
only be verified, as they referred to several climates: and
though unto us who live on this side of the line, the north
wind be coldest and driest; and on the contrary, the south
wind moist and warm, by reason that in one of these places
there is a stronger heat of the sun to exhale moist vapours,
than in the other ; yet it is clean otherwise with the inha-<
bitants beyond the other tropic ; for there the north wind is
the hottest, and moist, and the south the coldest, and dry:
so that with them, these scriptures cannot properly be af-
firmed, that cold or that fair weather cometh out of the
north; bat rather on the contrary. All which notwith-
standing, does not in the least manner derogate from the
truth of these speeches, or the omnisciency of the speaker,
but do rather shew the wisdom and goodness of the blessed
spirit, in vouchsafing thus to conform his language unto the
capacity of those people unto whom these speeches were
first directed : in the same sense are we to understand all
those places where the lights of heaven are said to be dark-
ened, and the constellations not to give their light, Isa. xiii.
10 *. Not as if they were absolutely in themselves deprived
of their light, and did not shine at all ; but because of their
appearance to us ; and therefore in another place answer-
able to these, God says, he will cover the heavens, and so
make the stars thereof dark, Ezek. xxxvii. 2. Which ar-
gues, that they themselves were not deprived of this light
(as those other speeches seem to imply) but we.
In reference to this likewise are we to conceive of those
other, expressions, that the moon shall blush, and the sun be
ashamed, Isa. xxiv. 23. That they shall be turned into
blood, Matth. xxiv. 29. Not that these things shall be so in
themselves (saith St. Jeromf,) but because tliey shall appear
so unto us. Thus also Mark xiii. 25. The stars shall (M.
from heaven ; that is, they shall be so wholly covered from
our sight, as if they were quite fallen from their wonted
places. rOr if this be understood of tlieir real fall, as it
* Joel ii. 31. item iii» 15. f Comment, in JoeJ, c. 3.
«
172 THAT THE SARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
.may seem probable by that place in the Revelations, vi. 1 5.
And the stars of heaven fell uato the earth, even as a fig*
tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken by a
mighty wind : then is it to be interpreted not of them that
are truly stars, but them that appear so : alluding unto the
opinion of the unskilful vulgar (saith Sanctius^} that think
the meteors to be stars. And Mersennus^ speaking of
the same scripture, says, hoc de verts stellis minime volunt
inierpretes intelligu sed de cometis et aliis ignitis ?neteoris:
interpreters do by no means understand this of true stars,
but of the comets and. other fiery meteors. Though the
&lling of these be a natural event, yet may it be accounted
a strange prodigy, as well as an earthquake, and the dark*
ening of the sun and moon, which are mentioned in the
verse before.
In reference to this, doth the scripture speak of some
common natural effects, as if their true causes were altoge-*
ther inscrutable, and not to be found out, because they were
generally so esteemed by the vulgar. Thus of the wind it
is said%' that none know whence it cometh, nor whither it
goeth. In another place ^ God is said to bring it out of his
treasures; and elsewhere* it is called the breath of iGrod^;
and so likewise of the thunder: concerning which, Joh''
proposes this question, the thunder of his power who cslm
understand ? and therefore too David^ does so oflen stile
it, the voice of God. All which places seem to imply, that
the cause of these things was not to be discovered, which
yet later philosophers pretend to know : so that according
to their construction, these phrases are to be understood ia
relation unto their ignorance unto whom these speeches
were immediately directed^
For tills reason is it ; why, though there be in nature
many other causes of springs and rivers than the sea, yet
Solomon (who was a great philosopher, and perhaps not
^ Commen. in Isa. c. xiii. 5.
• Commelit. in Gen. c. iii. v. 10. ar. 6. ^ Jph. iii. 8.
* Jer. X. 1 3. item li. 1 6. ^ Ot^y ^ Job xxxvii. 1 0.
''Jo. xxvi. 14. •Pial.ii.9.iii.4, &c, » Eccle5,i. 7.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 17S
ignorant of theni) does menfion only this ; because most
obvious, and easily apprehended by the vulgar *. Unto all
these scriptures, I might add that in Amos v. 8. which
speaks of the constellation coriimonly called the seven stars ;
whereas later discoveries have found that there are but six
of them discernible to the bare eye, as appears by Gali-
laeus his glass t : the seveilth of them being but a deceit of
the eye, arising from their too great nearness j and if a man
try in a clear night to number them distinctly, he shall find
that there will sometimes appear but six, and sometimes
more.
True indeed, the original word of this scripture HDO, does
not necessarily imply any such number in its isignifica^iony
but yet our English translation renders it the seven stars;
and if it had been expressly so in the original too, it might
have spoken true enough, because they are usually esteemed
of that number. And when it had been said, he made the
seven stars and Orion, we might have easily understood the
words thus : he made those constellations that are common-
ly known unto us under such names.
From all these scriptures it is clearly manifest, that it is a
frequent custom for the Holy Ghost to speak of nafural
things, rather according to their appearance and common
opinion, than the truth itself. Now it is very plain, and
our enemies themselves do grant it, that if the world had
been framed according to the system of Copernicus t,yii/i^.
rum esset ut vulgicSf de solis motu et terra statu proinde ui
nunc loqueretur. The vulgar phrase would have been the
same as now it is, when it speaks of the sun's motion, and
the earth's standing still.
Wherefore it is not improbable, that such kind of scrip-
ture-expressions are to be understood only in relation to
outward appearances, and vulgar opinion. .
* Job ix. 9. itexn. xxxviii. 31.
f Vide Fromond. Met. 1. 3. c. 1. art. 1. { Fromond. Ant. c. 6*
m
'-»
174 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANB^f.
PROP. IV.
That divers learned men have fallen into great aAsurdiikh
whilst they have looked for the sects of philosophy/ from
the words of scripture.
rr has been an ancient and common opinion amongst the
Jews, that the law of Moses did contain in It, not only
those things which concern our religion and obedience, but
every secret also that may possibly be -known in any art or
science * ; so that there is not a demonstration in geonaetry^
or rule in arithmetic ; not a mystery in any trade, but it
may be found out in the Pentateuch. Hence it was (say
they) that Solomon had all his wisdom and policy : hence
it was that he did fetch his knowledge concerning the na«
ture of vegetables, from the cedar of Lebanon, to the hyssop
that grows upon the wall. Nay from hence, they thought
a man might learn the art of miracles, to remove a moun<%
tain, or recover the dead. So strangely have the leameder*
sort of that nation been befooled, since their own curse hath
lighted upon them.
Not much unlike this foblish superstition of theirs, is
that custom of many artists amongst us ; who upon the in-
vention of any new secret, will presently find out some ob-
scure text or other to father it upon, as if the Holy Ghost
must needs take notice of every particular which their par-
tial fancies did over-value.
Nor are they altogether guiltless of this fault, who look
for any secrets of nature from the words of scripture; or
will examine all its expressions by the exact rules of philo-
sophy.
Unto what strange absurdities this false Imagination of
the learneder Jews hath exposed them, maybe manifest by
a great multitude of examples. I will mention only some
few of them. Hence it is that they prove the sliin-bone of
* Schlckard. Bechin. Hapem. Disp. 5. Num. S.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 115
Og the gianf to be above three leagues long * ; or (which is a
more modest relation) that Moses being fourteen cubits in
stature, having a spear ten ells in length, and leaping up ten
cubits, could touch this giant but on the ancle. All whicli
ihey can confirm unto you by a cabalistical interpretation
of this story, as it is set down in scripture. Hence it is that
they tell us of all those strange beasts which shall be seen at '
the coming of the Messias f : as first, the ox, which Job
calls Behemoth, that every day devours the grass oii a thou-
sand mountains, as you may see it in the psalm t, where
David mentions the cattle, or Ji^iOin:! upon a thousand hills.
If you ask how this beast does to find pasture enough, they
answer, that he remains constantly in one place, and where
there is as much grass grows up in the night, as was eateif
in the- day.
They tell us also of a bird, which was of that quantity,
that having upon a time cast an 6gg out of her nest, there
were beaten down by the fall of it three hundred of the
tallest cedars, and no less than threescore villages drowned.
As also of a frog as big as a town capable of sixty houses;
which frog, notwithstanding his greatness, was devoured by
a serpent, and that serpent by a crow ; which crow, as she
was fiying up to a tree, eclipsed the sun, and darkened
the world ; by which you may guess what a pretty twig that
tree was. If you would know the proper name of this bird,
you may find it in Psal. L 11 . where it is called V3, or in our
translation, the fowl of the mountains ||. It seems it was
somewhat of kin to that other bird they tell us of, whose
legs were so long, that they reached unto the bottom of
that sea, where there had been an axe-head falling for seven
years together, before it could come to the bottom.
Many other relations there are, which contain such hor-
rible absurdities, that a man cannot well conceive how they
should proceed from reasonable creatures. And all this
arising from that wrong principle of tlieirs, that scripture
* Schickard. ib. Disp. 6. num. 2* + Buxtor. Synag. Juda. c 36.
X Psal. 1. 10. II Vide Parap. Chald,
176 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANEl^.
did exactly contain in it all kind of truths; and that everf
meaning was true, which by the letter of it^ or by cabalisti*
cat iatcrpretcitions might be found out.
Now as it hath been with them, so likewise hath it haj^
pcned in proportion unto others, who by a superstitious ad-
hering unto the bare words of scripture, have exposed them-
selves unto many strange errors. Thus St. Basil ^ holds^
that next to the sun, the moon is bigger than any of tbt
stars, because Moses does call them only two great li^ts.
Tlius others maintain, that there are waters properly so
called, above the starry firmament, because of tixese vulgar
expressions in scripture, which in their literal sense do
mention them. Of this opinion were many of the ancients,
Philo, Josephus, and since them the fathers Justin Martyr*,
Theodoret^ Austin \ Ambi*ose% Basil^ and almost all the
rest Since them sundry other learned men, as Beda, Stra-
bo, Damascen, Tho. Aquinas, &c. If you ask for what
purpose they were placed here, Justin Martyr teUs us, for
these two ends : first, to cool the heat that might otherwise
arise from the motion of the solid orbs; and hence it is, say
they, that Saturn is colder than any of the other planets,
because though he move faster, yet he is nearer to these
waters. Secondly, to press and keep down the heavens,
lest the frequency and violence of winds might break and
scatter them asunder; which opinion, together with hodx
its reasons, are now accounted absurd and ridiculous.
St. Austin'' concludes the visible stars to be inhume'rable,
because scripture phrases seem to imply as much.
Tliat the heavens are not round, Was the opinion of
Justin Martyr*, Ambrose % Chrysostom ^°, Theodoret*^,
Theophilact'^^ doubted of by St. Austin", and divers others.
Nay, St. Chrysostom was so confident of it, that he pro-
' Enarrat. in Gen. ^Rcspons. ad Qiies. 93. Orthod.
^ Que. 11. sup. Gen. * De Civ. Dei, lib. 11. cap. ult.
5 Hcxam. 1. 2. c. 2. « Homil. 3. in Gen. *» Civ. Dei,l. 16. c. 23-
•Respon.ad Quest. 93. * Ilcxam. 1. 1. c. t*. ,
^ Homil. 14. in Ep. ad Ikbr. " In c. 8. Hebr.
^ In id. c» *^ In Gen. ad lit. l. I.e. 9. item. 1. 2. c. G.
'1^
THAT THE EART'H MAY BB A PLANET. IT?
poses the question in a triumphant manner: Tin eitrtv a
€<paipo£iS^ aqavov eiveu awo^>iuvoiJi.evoi ; Where are those men
that can prove the heavens to have a spherical form ? The
reason of which was this, because it is said In one scripture,
that God stretched forth the heavens as a curtain, Psal. civ.
2. and spreadeth them as a tent to dwell in, Isa. xl. 22. and~
so in that place of the epistle to the Hebrews, viii. 2. they
are called, a tent or tabernacle : which because it is no(
spherical, therefore they conclude also, that tlie heavens
are not of that form ; whereas now, the contrary is as evi-
dent as demonstration can make a thing. And therefore,
St Jerom^ in his time, speaking of the same error, gives it
this plain censure : est in ecclesia stultUoquitmiy si quis coe^
Ivm putetfornicis modo curoatum^ Esaiie quern nonintelligit
sermone deceptus. It is foolish speaking in the church, If
any through misapprehension of those words in Isaiah, shall
affirm the heavens not to be round.
That the seas not overflowing the land is a miracle, was
the opinion of Basil*, Chrysostom^, Theodoret*, Ambrose*,
NazianzenS and since them, Aquinas^ Luther^ Calvin,
Marlorate, with sundry others: which they proved from
these scripture expressions : that in Job xxxviii. 8, 11. who
hath shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if
it had issued out of the womb ; when I did break up for it
my decreed place ; and set bars, and doors, and said, hi-i^
therto shalt thou come, and no further, and here shall the
pride of the waves be staid. So likewise, Prov. viii. 29,
God gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not
pass his commandment. And Jerem. v. 22. I have placed
the sand for a bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that
they cannot pass it ; and though the waves thereof toss
themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet
can they not pass over, that they turn not again to cover
the earth. In all which places, say they, it is implied, that
^ lib. 3. Comment, in Galat. c. 5. ' Homil. 4. Hexam.
' Comment, in Job. * In Psal. ciii. * Hexam. 1. 3 . c. 2, 3 •
*Orat.34. '^ Aquinas^part 1. quest. 69. art, 1.
* Comment, in PiaL xxiv. item in Paal. cXxxvi. G.
▼OL. Z. N
178 THAT THE EA&TU MAY BE A PLANET.,
the water of itself, were it not mthheld from its own natu-
ral inclination by a more special power of God, would over-
flow the land.
Others infer the same conclusion from that in Ecclesias*
tes, where the rivers are said to come from the sea, which
they could not do, unless that were higher. I answer : they
should as well consider the latter part of that scripture,
which says, that the rivers return to that place from whence
they came, and then the force of this consequence will va-
nish. To this purpose some urge that speech of our Savi-
our, where he bids Simeon to launch forth into the deep* ;
the Latin word is, in altum ; from whence they gather, that
the sea is higher than the land. But this savours so much
of monkish ignorance, that it deserves rather to be laughed
at, than to be answered.
But now if we consider the true properties of this ele-
ment, according to the rules of philosophy, we shall find,
that its not overflowing the land is so far from being a mira-
cle, that it is a necessary consequence of its nature ; and it
would rather be a miracle, if it should be otherwise, as it
was in the general deluge. The reason is, because the wa-
ter of itself must necessarily descend to the lowest place;
which it cannot do, unless it be collected in a spherical
form, as you may plainly discern in this figure.
* Lttkev*4.Eiff«iM0c
' ;.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 179
Where the sea at D, may seem to be higher than a
mountain at B^ or C, because the rising of it in the midst,
does so intercept our sight fiom either of those places, that
we cannot look in a strait line, from the one to the other.
So that it may seem to be no less than a miracle, by which
the sea (being a heavy body) was withheld from flowing
^own to those lower places of B, or C. But now, if you
consider that the ascending of a body is its motion from the
centre, and descent is its approaching unto it; you shall
find, that for the sea to move from D, to B or C, is a mo-
tion of ascent, which is contrary to its nature, because the
mountains at B, or C, are farther off from the centre, than
the sea at D ; the lines A B, and A C, being longer than the
other A D. So that for the sea to keep always in its chan*
nel, is but agreeable to its nature, as being a heavy body.
But the meaning of those scriptures is, to set forth the power
and wisdom of God ; who hath appointed these channels
for it, and beset it with such strong banks to withstand the
fury of its waves. Or if these men do so much rely in na-
tural points, upon the bare words of scripture, they might
easily be confuted from those other places, where God is
said to have founded the earth upon the seas, and estab-
lished it upon the floods. From the literal interpretation
of which, many of the ancients have fallen into another er-
ror ; affirming the water to be in the lower place ; and as a
basis, whereon the weight of the earth was borne up. Of
this opinion were Clemens Alexandrinus*, Athanasiusf,
Hillary:):, £usebius||, and others. So that it seems, if a
man should resolutely adhere to the bare words of the
scripture, he might find contradiction in it; of which the
natural meaning is altogether incapable. St. Jerom § tells
us of some who would prover^stars to have understanding,
from that place in Isaiah, xlv. 1 2. My hands have stretched
out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.
Now (say they) none but intelligent creatures are capable
* Recog. 8. ^ Orat. cont. Idolos. | InPsal. cxxxvi. 6.
II In PiaL xxir. f Comment, in Isa. 1. 13.
V 2
i
. >
180 THAT THE EARTH MAT BE A tXAKBT.
of precqits ; mnd therefore the stars must needs have ra-
tional souls. Oftliis opinion was Philo the Jew*: nay»
many of the rabbies cOiu:lude, that they do every hour sing
praises unto God with an audible real voice f ; because of
that in Job xxxviii. 7. which speaks of the morning stars
singing together. And Psal. xix. 3, 4. where it is said of
the heavens, that there is no speech nor language where
their voice is not heard, and their words are gone to the
ends of the world. And whereas we translate that place
in the tenth of Joshua, concerning the standing still of the
heavens ; the original word, oi*t does properly signify si-
lence, and according to their opinion, Joshua did only bid
them hold their peace. From such grounds it is likely did
Origen:): fetch his opinion, that the stars should be saved*
I might set down many other the like instances, were it not
for being already weary of raking into the errors of anti*
quity, or uncovering the nakedness of our fore&thers. That
excuse of Acosta || may justly serve to mitigate the mistakes
of these ancient divines: facile ctrndmavdum est pairibuSf
si cum cognoscendo colendoque creatori ioti vacareniy de
creatura minus apte aliqua ex parte opinati sunt. Those
good men were so wholly busied about the knowledge and
worship of the creator, that they had not leisure enough
for an exact search into the essence of the creatures. How-
ever, these examples that have been already cited, may
sufficiently manifest how frequently others have been de-
ceived, in concluding the points of philosophy from the
expressions of scripture. And therefore it is not certain,
but that in the present case also, it may be insufficient for
such a manner of arguing.
* De plant. Noe. f Tostatusin Josh. c. 10. quest. 13, 14.
X Tom. 1. in Johan. |i De nat. noviorbis, 1, I.e. 2«
V
THAT THIS £AR1^ MAV B£ A PtANETr 181
PROP. V.
That the scinpture^ in its proper construction^ does not av^
where affirm the immobility of the earth.
npHE same answer which was insisted on before, con-
-*^ cernlng the conformity of scripture expressions to
men*s capacity and common opinion, may well enough sa-
tisfy all those other arguments, which seem thence to af-
firm the earth's settledness and immobility ; since this is as
well agreeable to outward appearance and vulgar apprehen-
sion as the other. But now for more full satisfaction, I
shall set down the particular places that are urged for it;
iK4iich being thoroughly examined, we may plainly discern
that none of them, in their proper meaning, will serve to
infer any such condusion.
One of these sayings is that of the preacher, Eccles. i, 4.
One generation cometh, and another passeth, but the earth
endureth for ever; where the original word is, HOVt and the
vulgar, j/a^; from whence our adversaries* conclude that
it is immoveable.
I answer: the meaning of the word, as it is here applied,
is permanent; or as we translate it, endureth. For it is
not the purpose of this place to deny all kind of motion to
the whole earth, but that of generation and corruption, to
which other things in it are liable. And though Pineda
and others keep a great deal of impertinent stir about this
scripture, yet they grant this to be the natural meaning of
it: which you may more clearly discern, if you consider
the chief scope of this book ; wherein the preacher's intent
is, to shew the extraordinary vanity of all earthly content-
ments, ver. 2. the utter unprofitableness of all a man's la-
bour, ver. 3. and this he illustrates by the shortness and un-
♦ VaDesius Sacra Phil.c. 62^ Fuller, MisceU. 1. l.c, 15. Pineda
Comment, in locum.
\
IM THAT THE EAUTH MAY BE A PLANET.
certainty of his life, in which respect he is below many of
his fellow creatures, as may be manifested from these four
comparisons.
1 . From the earth, which though it seem to be but as
the sediment of the world, as the rubbish of the creation;
yet is this better than man in respect of his lastingness ; for
one generation passeth away, and another cometh ; but the
earth that abideth for ever, ver. 4.
2. From the sun ; who though he seem frequently to go
down, yet he constantly seems to rise again, and shines
with the same glory*, ver. 5. but man dieth, and wasteth
away, yea, man givcth up the ghost, and where is he ? he
lieth down, and riseth not till the heavens be no more.
3. From the wind, the common emblem of uncertainty;
yet it is more constant than man, for that knows its circuits,
and whirieth about continually, ver. 6. whereas our life pas-
seth away as doth the wind, but returneth not again f.
4. From the sea ; though it be as uncertain as the moon,
by whom it is governed, yet it is more durable than man and
his happiness. For though the rivers run into it, and from
it, yet it is still of the same quantity that it was at the be-
ginning, ver. 7. but man grows worse as he grows older, and
still nearer to a decay, So that in this respect he is much
inferior to many other of his fellow creatures.
From whence it is manifest, that this constancy, or stand-
ing of the earth, is not opposed to its local motion, but to
the changing or passing away of divers men in their several
generations. And therefore thence to conclude the earth's
inmiobility were as weak and ridiculous as if one should
argue thus : one miller goes, and another comes, but the
mill remains still; ergo, the mill hath no motion {•
Or thus: one pilate goes, and another comes, but the
ship remains still ; erf^o^ the ship does not stir.
R. Moses II tells us, how that many of the Jews did from
this place conclude, that Solomon thought the earth to be^
♦ Job xiv. 10, 12. . t Pwl. Ixxviii. 39.
X Mr. Carpenter's Geog. 1. 1. c. 4. |) Perplex. L 2. c. 2d^
I
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 18S
eternal, because he saith it abideth tzh\)fy for ever ; and
questionless, if we examine it impartially, we shall find that
the phrase seems more to favour this absurdity, than that
which our adversaries would collect from hence, that it is
without motion. '
But Mr. Fuller urging this text against Copernicus, tells
us, if any should interpret these phrases concerning the
earth's standing still, ver. 4. and the sun's motion, ver. 5. in
reference only to appearance, and common opinion ; he must
necessarily also understand those two other verses which
mention the motion of the wind and rivers in the saide
sense. As if he should say ; because some things appear
otherwise than they are, therefore every thing is odierwise
than it appears: or, because scripture speaks of some na*
tural things, as they are esteemed according to man's false
conceit, therefore it is necessary that every natural thing
mentioned in scripture must be interpreted in the like
sense : or, because in one place we read of the ends of a
staff, 1 Kings viii. 8. and in many other places of the ends
of the earth, and the ends of heaven; therefore the earth
and heavens have as properly ends as a staff. It is the very
same consequence of that in the objection^ Because in
this place of Ecclesiastes we read with the rest of the earth»
and the motion of the sun; thereforis these phrases must
needs be understood in the same proper construction as
those afterwards, where motion was attributed to the wind
and rivers. Which inference you see is so weak, that the
objector need not triumph so much in its strength as he
doth.
Another proof like unto this is taken from St. Peter,
Epist. 2. cap. iii. ver. 5. where he speaks of the earth stand-
ing out of the water, and in the water, yv\ ^vstrmtrx, and
therefore the earth is irrimoveable.
I answer: it is evident that the word here is equivalent
with fuit ; and the scope of the apostle is to shew, that God
made all tlie earth, both that which was above the water,
and that which was under it. So that from this expression,
to collect the rest and immobility of the earth, would be
4
184 THAT THE EAUTH UAY BE A PX^ANET.
^scich an argumeat as this other. Such a man made that
* part of a mill-wheel, or a ship, which stands below the ^
water, and that part which stands above the water; there- Ij
fore those tilings are immoveable. j
To such vain and idle consequences does the heat of op-
position drive our adversaries.
A third argument stronger than either of the former, they
conceive may be collected from those scriptures*, where
it is said, the world is established, that it cannot be moved.
^To which I answer: these places speak of the world in
general, and not particularly of our earth ; and therefore
may as well prove the immobility of the heavens, they be-
ing the greatest part of the world ; in comparison to which,
our earth is but as an insensible point.
If you reply, that the word in these places is to be under-
stood by a synechdoche, as being meant only of this habi-
table world, the earth :
I answer: first, this is only said, not proved: secondly,
David but a little before seems to make a difierence between
the world and the earth, Psal. xc. 2. where he says, before
thou hadst formed the earth and the world. But thirdly,
in another place there is the same original word applied ex-
pressly to the heavens ; and which is yet more, the same
place does likewise mention this supposed settledness of the
earth, Prov. iii. 19. The JLord by wisdom hath founded the
earth; and by understanding hath he established the hea-
, vens. So that these places can no more prove an immobi-
lity in the earth than in the heavens.
If you yet reply, that by the heavens there is meant the
seat of the blessed, which does not move with the rest:
I answer: though by such an evasion a man might pos-
sibly avoid the force of this place ; yet, first, it is but a
groundless shift, because then that vCrse will not contain a
full enumeration of the parts in the world, as may seem
more agreeable to the intention of it; but only shew, that
God created this earth where we live, and the heaven of
* J Chron. xvi. 30. Psal. xciii. I. item xfvi. 10,
THAT THE EAIBLTH MAY BE A PLANET. 18$
m
heavens. So that the heaven of the stars and planets shall
be shifted out from the number of the other creatures. Se-"^^ *'
condly, there is another place which cannot be so avoided,
Psal. Ixxxix. 37. where the Psalmist uses this expression,
p3> it shall be established as the moon. So Psal. viii. 4. the
moon and the stars, nnariD liVi^ which thou hast established.
Thus likewise, Prov. viii. 27. when he established the hea-
vens: and in the next verse, our English translation reads
it, when he established the clouds. And yet our adversaries
will affirm the moon« and stars, and clouds to be subjec^t
unto natural motions : why then should the very same ex*
pressions be counted as sufficient arguments to take it away
from the earth ?
If it be replied, that by establishing the heavens, is meant ^
only the holding of them up, that they do not fall down to "^
us (as Lorinus* explains that in the eighth psalm, and
quotes Euthymius for the same interpretation;) fundan^i
verbum significat decidere non posse^ aut dim<yveri a loco ubi
collocata sunt. I answer, why may not we as well interpret
the words thus of the earth; so that by establishing of it, is
meant only the keeping of it up in the vast places of the
open air, Without falling to any other place.
From hence it is plain, that these scriptures are to be un-
derstood of such an immobility in the earth, as may likewise
agree with the heavens : the same original word being so
promiscuously applied to both.
Ay, but (you will say) there are some other places which >■
do more peculiarly apply this settledness and establishment *
to the earth. So Psal. cxix. 90* Thy faithfulness is unto
all generations: Thou hast established the earth, and it
abideth. Thus likewise, Psal. civ. 5. Who laid the foun-
dations of the earth, that it should not be moved for ever.
The latter of which, being well weighed in its original (saith
Mr. Fuller t) does in three emphatical words strongly con-
clude the earth's immobility.
As first, when he says lO* /undavit^ he hath founded It ;
* liorinus Comment, in Psal, viii. f Miscel. 1. 1. cap. 15.
i
186 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET-
wherein it is implied, that it does not change his place. To
which may be added all those texts, which so frequently
speak of the foundations of the earth ; as also that expres-
sion of the Psalmist, where he mentions the pillars of the
earth, Psal. Ixxv. 3.
The second word is mno translated basis; and by the
Septuagint, b%i thv ct(T(puKBtav ccuInQ ; that is, he hath founded
it upon its own firmness; and therefore it is altogether
without motion.
The third expression is IOOtVd^ from the root DVD which
1 rignifics, declinare\ implying, that it could not wag with
the least kind of declination.
To these I answer severally :
First, for the word, td» fundavit, it cannot be imdcrstood
properly, as if the natural frame of the earth, like other ar-
tificial buildings, did need any bottom to uphold it; for he
hangeth the earth upon nothing, Job xxvi. 1. But it is a
metaphor, and signifies God's placing or situating this globe
of land and water. As David tells us of tl.r pillars of the
earth ; so Job mentions pillars of the heavens, Job xxvL 1 1.
and yet that will not prove them to be immoveable.
True indeed, we read often concerning the foundations
of the earth : but so we do likewise of the ends, sides, and
corners of the earth ; and yet these scriptures will not prove
it to be of a long or square form. Besides, we read also of
the foundations of heaven, nHDID, 2 Sam. xxii. 8. And yet
we must not hence infer, that they are without all motion :
as also of the planting of the heavens, Isa. li. 6. which may
as well prove tliem to be immoveable, as that which follows
in the same verse concerning the foundations of the earth.
Which phrase (if I have observed right) in several places
of scripture, is to be understood according to these three
interpretations.
1. It is taken sometimes for the lower parts of the earth,
as appears by that place, 2 Sam. xxii. 16. The channels
of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were di&-^
covered *.
* So PsaL xviii. 1$.
TStAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 181
2. Sometimes for the beguming and fii-st creation of it»
Isa. xl. 2. Hath it not been told you from the beginnings
have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?
and in many other places, before the foundation of the
world was laid * ; that is, before the iirst creation*
3. Sometlrnes it signifies the magistrates and chief go-
vernors of the earth. So, many interpret that place in
Micah, where it is said, vi. 2. Hear O ye mountains the
Lord's controversy, and ye strong foundations of the earths
So Psal.lxxxii. 5. The foundations of the earth are out of
course ; and in Sam. ii. 8. they are called pillars. For the
pillars of the earth are the Lord's, and he hath set the world,
upon them. Hence it is, that the Hebrews derive their
word for master, or lord, from a root which signifies a basis
or bottom, pw, abfT^♦. And the Greek word for king,
does in its primitives import as much as the foundation of
the people, fieuriKBvg^ qtutsifiofftgrs Kasf. But now, none
of all the several interpretations of this phrase, will in the
least manner conduce to the confirmation of the present
argument.
As for the second word, noiDQ basis ejus: I answer, the
proper signification of it, is locus dispositus^ sedesy or static f
an appointed seat or station ; and according to this sense,
is it most frequently used in scripture. And therefore, the
heavens are sometimes called ]*30the seat of God*s habita-
tion. And for this reason likewise, do Aquila and Symma-
chus translate it by the word IS^, a seat or appointed situa-
tion, which may as well be attributed to the heavens.
The third expression is DIDn toy that it should not be
moved, from the primitive lOlO, which does not signify
barely to move, but declinare^ or vacillare, to decline or
slip aside from its usual course. Thus is it used by David,
Psal. xvii. 5. where he prays, hold up my goings in thy
paths, »03;d 1003 to that my footsteps slide not: he does not
mean that his feet should not move. So Psal. cxxi, 3. He
yrill not suffer thy foot to be moved. Thus likewise, PsaL
* John xvii. 24. Ephes.i.4. t Etymol. mag.
i
18ft THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAK£T.
xvi. 8. Because the Lord is at my right hand, I shall not
be moved. Which last place is translated in the New Tes-
tament* by the Greek word ^tfX^ftp, which signi&esjluctuaref
or vacillarey to be shaken by such an uncertain motion as
the waves of the sea. Now as David's feet may have their
usual motion, and yet in this sense be said pot to move,
that is, not to decline or slip aside ; so neither can the same
phrase applied to the earth, prove it to be immoveable.
Nor do I see any reason, why that of Didacus Astunkaf
may not be truly aiErmed, that we may prove the natural
motion of the earth, from that place in Job ix. 6. 2ui cam-
maoet terram e loco suo^ as well as its rest and immobility
from these.
From all which, it is very evident, that each of these ex-
pressions, concerning the founding or establishing both of
heaven or earth, were not intended to shew the unmove- \
ableness of either ; but rather, to manifest the power and i
wisdom of providence, who had so settled these parts of the
world in their proper situations, that no natoral cause could
displace them, or make them decline from their appointed
course. As for such who do utterly dislike all new inter-
pretation of scripture, even in such matters as do merely
concern opinion, and are not fundamental, I would only
propose unto them a speech of St. Hierom, concerning
some that were of the same mind in his time. Cum novas
semper expetant voluptates^ et gtUa eorum vicina mdria
turn sitfficianU cur in solo studio scripturarumy vcteri saperc
contenti sunt
Thus have I in some measure cleared the chiejfaigu<«
ments from scripture, against this opinion. For which not-
withstanding, I have not thence cited any \ because I con-
ceive the holy writ, being chiefly intended to' inform us of
jucb things as concern our faith and obedience, we cannot
ttiiice take any proper proof for the confirmation of natu-
ral secrets.
^ Act. ii. 25. t Comment, in J0I9&
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 18»
PROP. VI.
That thei^e is not any argument fr^x the words of scrips
turey principles of nature^ or observations in astronomy y
which can stiffidently evidence the earth to he in the cen-^
tre of the universe.
OUR adversaries do much insult in the strength of those
arguments which they conceive do unanswerably con-
clude the earth to be in the centre of the world. Whereas,
if they were but impartially considered, they would be
found altogether insufficient for any such conclusion, as
shall be clearly manifested in this following chapter.
The arguments which they urge in the proof of this,
are of three sorts ; either such as are taken,
1. From expressions of scripture.
2. From principles of natural philosophy.
3. From conimon appearances in astronomy.
Those of the first kind are chiefly two : the first is
grounded on that common scripture-phrase, which speaks
of the sun, as being above us. So Solomon often men^
tioning human affairs, calls them, the works which are
done under the sun *. From whence it appears, that the
earth is below it, and therefore nearer to the centre of the
universe, than the sun.
I answer : Though the sun in comparison to the abso*
lute frame of the world, be ia the midst ; yet this does not
hinder, but that in respect to our earth, he may be truly
said to be above it; because we usually measure the
height or lowncss of every thing, hy its being further off,
or nearer unto this centre of our earth. From Which,
9ince the sun is so remote, it may properly be affirmed t||tttr
we are under it, though notwitl^standing that be ilk 3ie
centre of the world*
* Ecclet i, 14, &c.
■ :,*
k
190 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
A second argument of the same kind, is urged by Fro*
mondus.
It is requisite, that hell (which is in the centre of the
earth*) should be most remotely situated from the seat of
the blessed. But now this heaven, which is the seat of the
blessed, is concentrical to tlie starry sphere : and therefore
it will follow, that our earth must be in the midst of this
sphere ; and so consequently in the centre of the world.
I answers this argument is grounded upon these uncer-
tainties ;
It That hell must needs be situated in the centra of our
earth.
2. That the heaven of the blessed must needs be con-^
centrical to that of the stars.
3. That places must be as far distant in atuatien as in
use.
Which because they are taken for granted, without any
proof, and are in themselves but weak and doubtful,
therefore the conclusion (which always follows the worser
part) cannot be strong, and so will not need any other
answer.
The second sort of arguments taken &om natural philo*
sophy, are principally these three.
1. First, from the vileness of our earth, because it con-
sists of a more sordid and base matter than any other part
of the world ; and therefore must be situated in the centre,
which is the worst place, and at the greatest distance from
those purer incorruptible bodies, the heavens.
I answer : this argument does suppose such propositions
for grounds, which are not yet proved, and therefore not
to be granted. As,
1 • That bodies must be as far distant in places, as in
nobility.
2. That the earth is of a more ignoble substance than
any of the other planets, consisting of a more base and vi)c
matter.
* Ancar. c. 12. item Vesta, tract. 5. c. 2.
I
•*
THAT THE EARTH M-AY BE A PLANET, 191
3. That the centre is the worst place.
All which are (if not evidently false) yet very uncertain.
2. From the nature of the centre, which is the place of
rest, and such as in all circular motions is itself immove-
able, and therefore will be the fittest situation for the
earth ; which by reason of its heaviness, is naturally unfit
for motion.
I answer: this argument likewise is grounded upon
these two false foundations ; as,
1. That the whole frame of nature does move round,
excepting only the earth.
2. That the whole earth, considered as whole, and in its
proper place, is heavy, or more unfit for a natural motion,
than any of the other planets.
Which are so far firom being such general grounds from
which controversies should be discussed, that they are the
very tiling in question betwixt us and our adversaries.
3. From the nature of all heavy bodies, which is to fall
towards the lowest place. From whence they conclude,
that our earth must be in the centre.
I answer : this may prove it to be a centre of gravity,
but not of distance, or that it is in the midst of the world.
Yea, (but say our adversaries) Aristotle for this urges a de-
monstration, which must needs be infallible. Thus the
motion of light bodies does apparently tend upward towards
the circumference of the world : but now the motion of
heavy bodies is directly contrary to the ascent of the other;
wherefore it will necessarily follow, that these do all of
them tend unto the centre of the world.
I answer: though Aristotle were a master in the art of
syllogisms, and he from whom we i-eccived the rules of
disputation ; yet in this particular, it is very plain that he
was deceived with a fallacy, whilst his argument does sup-
pose that which it does pretend to prove.
That light bodies do ascend unto some circunq^ence
which is higher and above the earth, is plain and undenia-
ble. But that this circumference is the same with that of
the world, or concentrical unto it, cannot be reasonably
4
192 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAVET.
affirmed, uitless he suppose the earth to be in the centre of
the universe, which is the thing to be proved.
I would fain know from what grounds our adversaries can
prove, that the descent of heavy bodies is to the centre; or
the ascent of light bodies, to the circumference of the
world. The utmost experience we can have in this kind,
does but extend to those things that are upon our earth, or
in the air above it And alas ! what is this unto the vast
frame of the whole universe, but punctulum, such an insen-
sible point, which does not bear so great a proportion to
' the whole, as a small sand does unto the earth. Where-
fore it were a senseless thing, from our experience of so
little a part, to pronounce any thing infallibly concerning the
situation of the whole. The arguments from astronomy,
are chiefly these four; each of which are boasted of to be
unanswerable.
I . The horizon does every where divide all the great
^ circles of a sphere into two equal parts; so there is always
half the equinoctial above it, and half below. Thus like-
wise, there will constantly be six signs of the zodiac above
the horizon, and other six below it. And besides, the ciN
cles of the heaven and earth, are each way proportionable
to one another; as fifteen German m9es on the earth, are
¥ every where agreeable to one degree in the heavens ; and
one hour in tlie earth, is correspondent to fifteen degrees in
the equator. From whence it may be inferred, that the
oarth must necessarily be situated in the midst of these cir-
cles; and so consequently, in the centre of the world.
I answer : this argument does rightly prove the earth to
be in the midst of these circles ; but we cannot hence con-
clude, that it is in the centre of the world: from which,
though it were never so much distant, yet would it still re-
main in the midst of those circles, because it is the eye that
imagines tliem to be described about it. Wherefore it
were a weak and preposterous collection, to argue thus,
tliat the earth is in the centre of the world, because in the
midst of those circles; or because the parts and degrees qS
the earth are answerable in proportion to the parts and d^
*,■
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
193
J
grees in heav^. Whereas, it follows rather on the contra-
ry, that these circles are equally distant and proportional in
their parts, in respect of the earth, because it is our eye
that describes them about the centre of it.
So that tliough a far greater part of the world did appear
at one time than at another, yet in respect of those circles
which our eye describes about the earth, all thiat we could
see at once, would seem to be but a perfect hemisphere ;
as may be manifested by this following figure.
Where if we suppose A to be our earth, B C D E one of
the great circles which we fancy about it, F G H I the orb
of fixed stars, R the ceiitte of them : now though the ark
G F I be bigger than the other G H I, yet notwithstanding,
to the eye on the earth A, one will appear a semicircle a4
well as the other; because the imagination does transfer all
those stars into the lesser circle B C D E, which it does
fancy to be described above that centre. Nay, though
there were a habitable earth at a far greater distance from
the centre of tlie world, even in the place of Jupiter, as sup-
pose at Q ; yet then also would there be the same appear-
ance. For though the ark K F L in the starry heaven,
were twice as big as the other K H L, yet notwithstanding
at the earth Q they would both appear but as equal hemi-
VOL. I. o
■*•■,. , .
•r.-.'-V-
J
i
194 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
spheres, being transferred into that other circle M N O P,
which is part of the sphere, that the eye describes to itself
about that earth.
From whence we mxff plainly discern, that though the
earth be never so far distant from the centre of the world,
yet the parts and degrees of that imaginary sphere about
it, will always be proportional to the parts and degrees of
the earth.
2. Another demonstration like unto this former, fre-
quently urged to the same purpose, is this. If the earth be
out of the centre of the world, then must it be situated in
one of these three positions : eitlier in tlie equator, but out
of the axis; or 2dly, in the axis, but but of the equator;
or 3dly, besides both of them. But it is not placed accord-
ing to any of these situations, therefore must it needs be in
the centre *.
1. It is not in the equator, and beside the axis: for then,
1st, there will be no equinox at all in some places, when
the days and nights shall be of an equal length; 2dly, the
afternoons and forenoons will not be of the same length;
because, then our meridian line must divide the hemisphere
into unequal parts.
2. It is not in the axis, but out of the equator; for then,
first, the equinox would not happen when the sun was in
the middle line betwixt the two solstices, but in some other
parallel, which might be nearer to one of them, according
as the earth did approach to one tropic more than another.
Secondly, there would not be such a proportion between
the increase and decrease of days and nights, as now there
is.
3. It is not besides both of them: for then, all these in-
conveniencies, and sundry others must with the same ne-
cessity of consequence be inferred. From whence it will
follow, that the earth must be situated there where the
axis and equator meet, which is in the centre of the world.
To this we grant, that the earth must needs be placed
V
* Vid. Carp. Geog, 1. I. c. 5.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAN5T. 19S
both in the axis and equator ; and so consequently, in the ^
centre of that sphere which we imagine about it. But yet
this will not prove, that it is in the midst of the universe :
for let our adversaries suppose it to be as far distant from
that, as they conceive the sun to be ; yet may it still be si-
tuated in the very concourse of these two ' lines ; because
the axis of the world is nothing else, but' thai^. imaginary
line which passes through the poles of our earth, to the
poles of the world. And so likewise the equator is nothing
else but a great circle in the midst of the earth, betwixt
both the poles, which by imagination is continued even to
the fixed stars. Thus also, we may affirm the earth to be
in the plane of the zodiac, if by its annual motion it did
describe that imaginary circle : and in the plane of the
equator, if by its diurnal motion about its own axis, it (did
make several parallels, the midst of which should be the
equator. From whence it appears, that these two former
arguments proceed firom one and the same mistake ; whilst
our adversaries suppose the circumference and centre of
the sphere, to be the same with that of the world.
Another demonstration of the same kind, is taken from
the eclipses of the sun and moon; which would not always
happen when these two luminaries are diametrically op-
posed, but sometimes when they are less distant than a
semicircle, if it were so that the earth were not in the
centre.
I answer: this argument, if well considered, will be
found most directly to infer this conclusion; that in ^11
eclipses, the earth is in such a strait line (betwixt the two
luminaries) whose extremities do point unto opposite parts
of the zodiac. Now, though our adversaries should sup-
pose (as Copernicus does) the earth to be situated in that
which they would have to be the sun's orb ; yet would
there not be any eclipse, but when the sun and moon were
diametrically opposite, and our earth betwixt them ; as may
clearly be manifested by this figure, where you see the two
lunjinaries in opposite signs : and according as any part of
o 2
196 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
our earth is situated by its diurnal revolution, so will every
eclipse be either visible, or not visible unto it.
The last and chief argument, is taken from the appear-
ance of the stars; which in every horizon, at each hour of
the night, and at all times of the year, seem of an equal
bigness*. Now this could not be, if our earth were some-
times nearer unto them by 2000000 German miles, which
is granted to be the diameter of that orb wherein the earth
is supposed to move.
I answer: this consequence will not hold, if we affirm
the earth's orb not to be big enough for the making of ;piny
sensible difference in the appearance of the fixed stars-
Yea, but (you will say) it is beyond conceit, and without
all reason, to think the fixed stars of so vast'a distance from
us, that our approaching nearer unto them by 2000000
German miles, cannot make any difference in the seeming
quantity of their bodies f .
I reply: there is no certain way to find out the exact
distance of the starry firmament; but we are fain to con-
* Ariit. de coek), lib. 2. c. 14.
t Copem. 1. 1. cap. 5> 6.
.' •.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 197
elude of it by conjectures, according as several reasons and
observations seem most likely unto the fancies of divers
men. Now that this opinion of Copernicus does not make
it too big, may be discerned from these following conside-
rations.
The words great and little, are relative terms, and do im-
port a comparison to something else : so that where the
firmament, (as it is according to Copernicus) is said to be
too big, it is likely that this word is to be understood in re-
ference to some other thing of tlie same kind, the least of
which is the moon's orb. But now if its being so much
bigger than this, maybe a sufBcient reason why it should be
thought too great, then it seems that every thing which ex-
ceeds another of the same kind in such a proportion, may
be concluded to be of too big a quantity; and so conse-
quently, we may affirm that tliere is no such thing in the
world. And hence it will follow, that whales and elephants
are mere chimseras, and poetical fictions, because they do
so much exceed so many other living creatures. If all this
cightii sphere, (saith Galilseus) as great as it is, were a light
body, and placed so far from us that it appeared but as one
of the lesser stars, we should then esteem it but little; and
therefore we have no reason now to thrust it out from being
amongst the works of nature, by reason of its too great im-
mensity. It is a fiequent speech of our adversaries, Tycho,
Fromondus, and others, in excuse of that incredible swift-
ness which they imagine in their primum mobile^ that it
was requisite the motion of the heavens should have a kind
of infinity in it, the better to manifest the infiniteness of the
creator. And why may not we as well affirm this con-
cerning the bigness of the heavens? Difficilius est accidens
prater modulum subjecti intendere^ quam subjectum sine
accidente auger e (saith Keplar.) His meaning is, that it is
less absurd to imagine the eighth sphere of so vast a big-
ness, as long as it is without motion, or at least has but a
very slow one ; than to attribute unto it such an incredible
celerity, as is altogether disproportionable to its bigness.
198 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
2. It is the acknowledgment of Clavius*, and might
easily be demonstrated, that if the centre were fastened
upon the pole of the world, the orb wherein he supposes
the sun to move would not be able to reach so far in the
eighth sphere (being considered according to Ptolemy's
hypothesis) as to touch the pole star; which notwithstand-
ing (saitli he) is so near the pole itself, that we can scarce
discern it to move; nay, that circle which the pole-star
makes about the pole, is above four times bigger than the
orb of the sun. So that according to the opinion of our
adversaries, though our earth were at that distance from the
centre, as they suppose the sun to be, yet would not this
eccentricity make it nearer to any one part of the firma-
ment, than the pole-star is to the pole ; which according to
his confession, is scarce sensible. And tlierefore according
to their opinion, it would cause very little difference in the
appearance of those stars, the biggest of which does not
seem to be of above five seconds in its diameter.
3. It is considerable, that the spheres of Saturn, Jupiter,
Mars, are, according to the general opinion, of very great
extension ; and yet each of them is appointed only to carry
about its particular planet, which are but very little in com-
parison of the fixed stars. Now if for the situation of these
fixed stars, there should be allotted a proportionable part
of the world, it is certain that their orb must be far bigger
than it is commonly supposed, and very near to this opinion
of Copernicus.
4. We usually judge the bigness of the higher orbs by
their different motions : as because Saturn finishes his course
in thirty years, and Jupiter in twelve, therefore we attribute
unto those orbs such a different proportion in their bigness.
Now if by this rule we would find out the quantity of the
eighth sphere, we shall discern it to be far nearer unto that
bigness which Copernicus supposeth it to have, than that
which Ptolemy, Tycho, and others ordinarily ascribe unt^
* Comment, ijx Sphaer. cap. 1,
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 199
it: for the starry heaven (say they) does not finish his
course under 26000 years; whereas Saturn, which is next
'Unto it, does compass his orb in thiriJy years. From,
whence it will probably follow, tllat there is a very great
distance betwixt these in place, because they have sucli dif-
ferent terms of their revolutions.
But against this answer unto the last argument, our ad-
.versaries thus reply :
1. If the fixed stars are so far distant from us, that our
approaching nearer unto them by 1000000 German miles,
does not make any sensible difference in their appearance ;
then Galilaeus's perspective could not make them seem of
a bigger form than they do to the bare eye, which yet is
contrary to common experience*.
2. From hence it may be inferred, that the least fixed
star is bigger than all this orb wherein we suppose the .
earth to move; because there is none of them but are of a ,
sensible bigness in respect of the firmament, whereas this it
seems is notf.
3. Since God did at first create the stars for the use of
all nations that are under the whole heavens, Deut. iv. 19.
it might have argued some improvidence in him, if he had
made them of such vast magnitudes; whereas they might
as well bestow their light and influences, and so conse-
quently be as serviceable to that end for which they were
appointed, if they had been made with less bodies, and
placed nearer unto us. And it is a common maxim, that
nature in all her operations, does avoid superfluities, and
use the most compendious way J.
I answer:
1. To the first, whether the perspective do make the
fixed stars appear bigger than they do to the bare eye, can-
not certainly be concluded, unless we had such an exact
glass, by which we might try the experiment. But if in
this kind we will trust the authority of others, Keplar |1 tell§
* Fromond. Vesta, tract. 5. cap. 1. f Ibid. ' J Ibid.
II Astron. Copern. lib. 4. par. 1.
• J
200 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET*
US from the experience of skilful men, that the better
the perspective is, by so much the less will the fixed stais
appear through it, being but as meet points, from which the
beams of light do disperse themselves like hairs. And it is
commonly affirmed by others, that the dog-star^ which
seems to be the biggest star amongst those of tlie firsi mag*
nitude, does yet appear through this glass but as a little
pcJint no bigger than thje fiftieth part of Jupiter. Hence it
is, that though the common opinion hold the stars of the
first magnitude to be two minutes in thek diameter, and
Tycho three ; yet GalilaBU|*, who hath been most versed
in the experiments of his own perspective concludes them
to be but five seconds. '
2. To the second : first we a&m, the fixed stars to be of
a vast magnitude. But however,' this argument does not
induce any necessity that we should conceive them so big
as the earth's orb. For it might easily be proved, that
though a star of the sixth magnitude were but equal in di-
ameter unto the sun (which is far enough from the great-
ness of the earth's orb ;) yet the starry heaven would be at
such a distance from us, t^t the earth's annual motion
could not cause any difFcrence in its appearance.
Suppose the diameter of the sun to be abqut half a
degree t> as our adversaries grant ; whereas a star of the
sixth magnitude is 50 thirds, which is comprehended in
that of the sun 21 60 times. Now if the sun were removed
so far from us, that its diameter would seem but as one of
that number whereof it now contains 2160 ; then must his
distance from us be 21 6Q times greater than now it is:
which is all one, as if we should say, that a staf of the
sixth magnitude is severed from us by so many semidia-
meters of the earth's orb. But now according to comipon
consent, the distance of the earth frpm the sun does con-
tain 1 28 seoudiameters of the earth, and (as was said be-
fore) this supposed distance of the fixed stars does compre-
hend 2160 semidiameters of the earth^s orb. From whence
it is manifest, that the semidiameter of the earth, in com-:
* System. Mundi. CoU. 3. f Vid. Gal. ibid.
THAT THE EAUTH MAY BE A Pl-ANET. 201
parison to its distance from the sun, will be almost doubly
bigger than the semidiameter of the earth's orb, in compa-
rison to this distance of the stars. But now, the semidia-
meter of the earth does make very little difference in the
appearance of the sun, because we see common observa-^
tions upon the surface of it, are as exactly true to the sense
as if they were made from the centre of it. Wherefore,
that difference which would be made in these fixed stars,
by the annual course of the earth, must needs be much
more unobservable, or ratlier altogether insensible.
2. The consequence of this^argument is grounded" upoa
this false supposition, that every body must necessarily be
of an equal extension to that distance from whence there
does not appear any sensible difference in its quantity.
So that when I see a bird flying such a height in the air,
that my being nearer unto it, or farther from it, by ten or
twenty foot, does not make it seem unto my eyes either
bigger or less; then I may conclude, that the bird must
needs be either ten or twenty foot thick : Or when I see
the body of a tree that may b^ half a mile from me, and
perceive that my approaching nearer to it by 30 or 40
paces, does not sensibly make any different appearance, I
may then infer, that the tree is forty paces thick ; with
many the like absurd consequences, that would follow
from that foundation upon which this argument is bot-
tomed.
To the third I answer : it is too much presumption, to
conclude that to be superfluous, the usefulness of which we
do not understand. Therc»-be many secret ends in these
great works of Providence, which human wisdom cannot
reach unto ; and as Solomon speaks of those things that
are under the sun, so may we also of those things that
are above it; that no man can find out the works of
God ; for though a man labour to seek it out, yea further,
though a wise man think to know it, yet shall he not be-
able to find it *. He that hath most insight into the works
of nature, is not able to give a satisfying reason, why the
* ^ccles. viii. 17.
4
202 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANJET.
planets or stars should be placed just at tfab particular
distance from the earth, and no nearer or farther. And
besides, this argument might as well be urged against the
hypothesis of Ptolemy or Tycho, smce the stars, for ought
wc know, might have been as serviceable to us, if they had
been placed far nearer, than either of those authors suppose
them. Again, were there any force in such a consequence,
it would as well conclude a great improvidence of nature,
in making such a multitude of those lesser stars, which have
lately been discovered by the perspective. For to what
purpose should so many lights be created for the use of
man, since his eyes were not able to discern them ? So
that our disability to comprehend all those ends which
might be aimed at in the works of nature, can be no suffi-
cient argument to prove their superfluity. Though scrip-
ture do tell us that these things were made for our use, yet
it does not tell us, that this is their only end. It is not
impossible, but that there may be elsewhere some other
inhabitants, by whom these lesser stars may be more
plainly discerned. And (as was said before) why may not
we affirm that of the bigness, which our adversaries do
concerning the motion of the heavens ? That God, to
shew his own immensity, did put a kind of infinity in the
creature.
There is yet another argument to this purpose, urged
by Al. Ross *. which was not referred to any of the former
kind, because I could scarcely believe I did rightly under-
stand it ; since he puts it in the front of his other argu^
ments, as being of strength and subtilty enough to be a
leader unto all the rest ; and yet in the most likely sense of
it, it is so extremely simple to be pressed in a controversy, ^
that every fresh-man would laugh at it. The words of it
are these : Suod minimum est in circulo debet esse centimni
illius ; at terra longe minor est sole, X ^quinoctialis tcr-
reHris est omnium in coelo drculus minimus ; ergOy &c.
By the same reason, it would rather follow, that the
* Lib. 1. sect. 2. c. 1.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 203
moon or Mertury were in the centre, since both these are
less than the earth. And then, whereas he says that the
^equinoctial of the earth is the least circle in the heavens,
it is neither true nor pertinent, and would make one suspect,
that he who should urge such an argument, did scarce un-
derstand any thing in astronomy.
There are many other objections like unto this, not
worth the citing : tlie chief of all have been already an-
swered ; by which you may discern, that there is not any
such great necessity as our adversaries pretend, why the
earth should be situated in the midst of the universe.
PROP. VII.
It is probable that the Sun is in the centre of the rtorld.
THE chief reasons for the confirmation of this truth, are
implied in the conveniences of this hypothesis above
afty other ; whereby we may resolve the motions and ap-
pearances of the heavens into more easy and natural
causes.
Hence will the frame of nature be freed from that
deformity which it has according to the system of Tycho ;
who though he make the sun to be in the midst of the
planets, yet without any good reason denies it to be in the
midst of the fixed stars ; as if the planets, which are such
eminent parts of the world, should be appointed to move
about a distinct centre of their own, which was beside that
of the universe.
Hence likewise are we freed from many of those incon-
veniences in the hypothesis of Ptolemy, who supposed in
the heavens, epicycles and eccentrics, and other orbs,
which he calls tJie deferents of the apoge and perige. As
if nature in framing this great engine of the world, had been
put unto such hard shifts, that she was fain to make use of
wheels and screws, and other the like artificial instruments
of motion.
%
204- THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
There be sundry other particulars, whereby this opinion
concerning the sun's being in the centre, may be strongly
evidenced ; which because they relate unto several motions
also, cannot therefore properly be insisted on in this place,
You may easily enough discern them, by considering the
whole frame of the heavens, as they are according to the
system of Copernicus , wherein all those probable resolu-
tions that are given for divers appearances amongst the
planets, do mainly depend upon this supposition, that the
sun is in the centre. Which arguments (were there no
other) might be abundantly enough for the confirmation of
it. But for the greater plenty, there are likewise tliese pro-
babilities considerable.
1. It may seem agreeable to reason, that the light which
is diffused in several stars, through the circumference of
the world, should be more eminently contained, and (as it
were) contracted in the centre of it, which can only be by
placing the sun there.
2. It is an argument of Clavius.*, and frequently urged
by our adversaries. That the most natural situation of the
sun's body was in the midst, betwixt the other planets ; and
that for this reason, because from thence he might more
conveniently distribute amongst them both his light and
heat. The force of which may more properly be applied
to prove him in the centre.
3. It is probable that the planetary orbs (which are
Special parts of the universe) do move about the centre of
the world, rather than about any other centre which is re-
mote from it. But now it is evident that the planets Saturn,
Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Mercury, do by their mbtion encom-
pass the body of the sun. It is likely therefore that this is
situated in the midst of the world.
As for the three upper planets, it is found by observation,
that they are always nearest to the earth when in opposition
to the sun, and farthest from us when in conjunction with
it ; wliich difference is so eminent, that Mars in his pcrige
* In prim. c. Sphcr.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 205
does appear sixty times bigger than when he is in the apoge,
and at the greatest distance.
Now, that the revolution of Venus and Mercury also is
about the sun, may from hence be evidenced.: First, be-
cause they are never at any great/ distance from him.
Secondly, because they are seen sometimes above, and
sometimes below him. Thirdly, because Venus, according
to her different situation, does change her appearance as the
moon.
4. There is yet another argument, which Aristotle *
himself does repeat from Pythagoras. The most excellent
body should have the best place ; but the sun is the most
excellent body, and the* centre is the best place ; therefore
it is likely the sun is in the centre. In the frame of nature
(which is supposed to be of an orbicular form) there are but
two places of any eminency, the circumference and the
centre. The circumference being of so wide a capacity,
cannot so fitly be the peculiar seat of a body, that is so little
in respect of it : and besides, that which is the most ex-
cellent part of the world, should be equally preserved in it-
self, and shared in its virtues by all the other parts, which
can only be done by its being placed in the midst of them.
This is intimated unto us in that frequent speech of Plato,
that the soul of the world does reside in the innermost
place of it; and that in Macrobius f, who often compares
the sun in the world to the heart in a living creature.
Unto this Aristotle answers by a distinction: there is
medium magnitudims^ so the centre is the middle of a
sphere, and there is medium natura<, or informationisy
which is riot always the same with the other ; for in this
sense the heart is the middle of a man ; because from
thence (saith he) as from the centre, the vital spirits are
conveyed to all the members : and yet we know that it is
not the centre of magnitude, or at an equal distance from
all the other parts.
And besides, the middle is the worst place, because most
circumscribed, since that is more excellent which does
* De Coelo, 1. 2. c. 13. f Saturnal. L 1. c. 17, &c.
206 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
limit any thing, than that which is bounded by it. For this
reason is it, tliat matter is amongst those things which are
terminated, and form, that which does circumscribe.
But against this answer of Aristotle, it is again replied :
1 . Though it be true, that in living creatures the best
and chiefest part is not placed always just in the midst, yet
this may be, because they are not of an orbicular form, as
the world is *.
2. Though that which bounds another thing be more
excellent than that which is terminated by it, yet this does
not prove the centre to be the worst place, because that is
one of the terms or limits of a round body, as well as the
circumference.
There are likewise other arguments to this purpose,
much insisted on by eminent astronomers f, taken from
that harmonical proportion which there may be betwixt the
several distance and bigness of the orbs, if we suppose the
sun to be in the centre.
For according to this (say they) we may conceive an
excellent harmony both in the number and the distance of
the planets : (and if God made all other things numero K
mensurdy much more then those greater -works, the hea-
vens) ; for then the five mathematical bodies, so much
spoken of by Euclid J, will bear in them a proportion an-
swerable to the several distances of the planets from one
another.
Thus a cube will measure the distance betwixt Saturn
and Jupiter ; a pyramis or tctraedron, the distance betwixt
Jupiter and Mars ; a dodecaedron, the distance betwixt Mars
and the Q^rth ; an icosaedron, the distance betwixt the earth
and Venus ; and an octaedron the distance betwixt Venus
and Mercury ; that is, if we conceive a circumference de-
scribed immediately without the cube, and another within it,
the distance between these two will shew what proportional
distance there is betwixt the orb of Saturn and that of
* Keplar, Astr. Copcrn. 1. 4. part 2.
f Maeslin.prx. ad Narrat. Ehetici, Keplar, MysteriumCosmographiciun,
% Lib. 13.prop. U, 15> &c.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 207
Jupiter. Thus also if you conceive a circumference de-
scribed on the outside of a pyramis or tetraedron, and ano-
ther within it, this will shew such a proportional distance as
there is betwixt the orb of Mars from that of Jupiter.
And so of the rest.
Now if any ask w^hy there are but six planetary orbs ?
Keplar answers : 2uia non oportet plures quam quinque
proportiones esse^ totidem nempe quot regularia sunt in
maihesi corpora. Sex autem termini consummant hunc
proportionum numerum. Because there are but five pro-
portions, so many as there are regular bodies in mathe-
matics, each of whose sides and angles are equal to one
another. But now there are six terms required to consum-
mate this number of proportions; and so consequently,
there can be but six primary planets.
Thus likewise by placing the sun in the centre, we may
conceive such a proportion betwixt the bodies of the
planets, as will be answerable unto their several spheres:
then Mercury, which has the least orb, will have the least
body ; Venus bigger than that, but less than any of the
other ; our earth bigger than Venus, but less than the rest;
Mars bigger than the earth, but less than Jupiter; Jupiter
bigger than Mars, and less than Saturn ; Saturn being the
highest, should also be the biggest. All which harmon^v '-
would be disturbed by putting in the sun amongst thetn ;
and therefore it may be more convenient for him to sit still ~
in the centre.
There are sundry other arguments in this kind to be
found out, by a consideration of this whole hypothesis :
He that does rightly understand it, may therein easily dis-
cern many strong probabilities, why the sun should be ia
the midst of the world, rather than in any other position.
208 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET- :|br "
PROP. VIII.
That there is not any sufficient reason to prtwe the earth
incapable of those motiom which Copernicus ascribes
unto it.
THE two chief motions in the world, which are more
especially remarkable above the rest, are the diurnal,
and annual.
The diurnal, which makes the difference betwixt night
and day, is caused by the revolution of our earth upon its
own axis, in the space of four and twenty hours.
The annual, which makes the difference betwixt winter
and summer, is likewise caused by the earth, when being
carried through the ecliptic in its own orb, it finishes its
course in a year.
The first is usually stiled, motus revolutianis : the second,
motus circumlationis : tliere is likewise a third, which
Copernicus calls, mottts inclinationis : but this being tho-
roughly considered, cannot properly be stiled a motion, but
rather an immutability, it being that whereby the axis of
the earth does always keep parallel to itself, from which si*
tuation it is not his annual course that does make it in the
least manner to decline.
As for the difficulties which concern the second of these,
they have been already handled in the sixth proposition,
where the earth's eccentricity was maintained.
So that the chief business of this chapter, is to defend the
earth's diurnal motion, against the objections of our adver-
saries. Sundry of which objections, to speak (as the truth
is) do bear in tliem a great shew of probability, and such
too (as it seems) was very efficacious ; since Aristotle and
Ptolemy, &c. Men of excellent parts and deep judgments
did ground upon them, as being of infallible and necessary-
consequence.
I shall reckon them up severally, and set down such an^
swers unto each, as may yield some satisfaction to every
indifferent seeker of truth.
\
• tHAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET; 209
1. First then, it is objected from our senses ; if the earth
did move, we should perceive it. The western mountains
Would then appear to ascend towards the stars, rather than
the stars to descend below themi
1 answer : the sight judges of motion according as any
thing does desert the plain whereon itself is seated ; which
plain everywhere keeping the same situation and distance,
in respect of the eye, does therefore seem immoveable unto
it, and the motion will appear in those stars and parts of
the heaven, through which the vertical line does pass.
The reason of such deceit may be this ! motion being
not a proper object of the^ight, nor belonging to any other
peculiar sense, must therefore be judged of by the sensus
communis^ which is liable to iriistake in this respect ; be-
cause it apprehends the eye itself to rest' immoveable, whilst!
it does not feel any effects of this motion in the body:
as it is when a man is carried in a ship ; so that sense is
but an ill judge of natural secrets. It is a good rule of
Plato, Eig rov vbv ceCPo^v iei (PiXo(to0ov vlcu jxi^ eig rt)v o^/v :
a philbsopher must not be carried away by the bare ap-*
peafance of things to sight, but must examine them by rea-
son. If this were a good consequence, tl^e earth does not
move, because it does not appear so to us, we might then
as well argue, that it does move when we go upon the wa«*
ter, according to the verse :
Pr<wehimur portu^ terraque^ urbesque recedunt.
Or if such arguments vrould hold, it were an easy matter
to prove the sun and moon not so big as a hat, or the fixed
stars as a candle.
Yea, but if the motion of the heavens be only apparent,
and not real, then the motion of the clouds will be so too,
since the eye may be as Well deceived in the one as the
other *.
I answer : it is all one, as if he should infer that the sense
was mistaken, in every thing, because it was 30 in one
^ Al. Rom. L 1» sect. 1. c. 1.
VOL. 1. p
\
210 THAT THE EARTIT'MAY BE A PBANET*
thing : and this would be an excellent argument to prove
that opinion of Anaxagoras, that the snow was black.
The reason why that motion which is caused by the
earth does appear as if it were in the heavens, is, because
the sensus communis in judging of it, does conceive the eye
to be itself immoveable (as was said before) there being no
sense that does discern the effects of any motion in the
body ; and therefore it does conclude every thing to move,
which it does perceive to change its distance from it : so
that the clouds do not seem to move sometimes, when as
notwithstanding they are everywhere carried about with
our earth, by such a swift revolution ; yet this can be no
hindrance at all, why we may not judge aright of their
other particular motions, for which tliere is not the same
reason. Though to a man in a ship, the trees and banks
may seem to move, yet it would be but a weak argument,
to conclude from hence, that therefore such a one could not
tell whether his friend does really stir, whom he sees to
walk up and down in the ship : or that he might as well be
deceived in judging the oars to move when they do not
It is again replied by the same objector *, that it is not
credible the eye should be mistaken in judging of the stars
and heavens ; because those being light bodies, are the pri-
mary and proper objects of that sense.
I answer : the deceit here is not concerning the light or
colour of those bodies, but concerning their motion ; which
is neither the primary nor proper object of the eye, but
reckoned amongst the ebjecta commuma.
2. Another common argument against this motion, is
taken from the danger that would thence arise, unto all
high buildings, which by this would quickly be ruinated, and
scattered abroad.
I answer: this motion is supposed to be natural; and
those things which are according to nature, have contrary
effects to other matters, which are by force and violence t«
Now it. belongs unto things of this latter kind to be incos-
* Al. Ross. 1. 1. sect. 1. c. 1. f Coper, h 1. c. 8.
THAT TltE EAartl j^f AY Bt A l>LANEt. 211
sistent and hurtful; whereas those of the first kind must be
regular, and tending to conservation. The motion of the
earth is always equal and like itself ; not by starts and fits.
If a glass of beer may stand firmly enough in a ship, when
it moves swiftly upon a smooth stream, much less then will
the motion of the earth, which is more natural, and so con-
sequently morfc^ equal, cause any danger unto those build-
ings that are erected upon it. And therefore to suspect any
such event, would be like the fear of Lactantius, who would
not acknowledge the being of any antipodes, lest then he
taight be forced to grant that they should fall down unto
the heavens *. We have equal reason to be afraid of high
buildings, if the whole world above us were whirled about
Vrith such a mad celerity as our adversaries suppose ; for
then there would be but small hopes that this little point of
earth, should escape from the rest. . jr^
But supposing (saith Rossef) that this motion were na-
tural to the earth, yet it is hot natural to towns and build«
ings, for these are artificial.
To which I answer; ha, ha, he.
3. Another argument to this pilkrpose is taken from the
rest and quietness of the air about us; which could not be,
if there were any such swift motion of the earth. If a man
riding upon a fieet horse, do perceive the air to bj^t against
his face, as if there wexfi a wind, what a vehement tempest
should we continually feel from the east, if the earth were
turned about with such a swift revolution as is supposed.
Unto this it is usually answered, that the air also is carried
along with the same motion of the earth: for if the conca-
vity of the moon^s orb, which is of so smooth and glabrous
a superficies, may (according to our adversaries) drive along
with it the greatest part of this, elementary world, all the
regions of fire, and all the vast upper regions of air, and (as
Some will have it) the two lower regions, together with the
sea likewise; for from hence (saith Alex« Rosse, I. 1. sect.
1. c. 3.) is it, that betwixt the tropics there is a constant
* ' • ' ' *
' * Gilbert de Magn. 1 6. c. 5. ' , f I4b» 1. lect. 1 . c. 3.
P2
^
212 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A JLAKET-
castern wind, and a continual flowing of the sea westward;
I say, if the motion of the heavens, which are smooth bo-
dies, may be able to carry with it so great a part of the ele-
mentary world : or if the rugged parts of the moon's body
be able to carry with it so great a part of the air, as Fro-
mondus (Ant. c. 16.) affirms; much more then may our
earth, which is a rugged mountainous body, be able to turn
about so little a part of the world, as that vaporous air next
unto it.
««••••!•••••
Suppose the inward circle to represent the earth ; and
the outward the thicker air, which encompasses it Now
it is easily conceivable, that the revolution of so great a
body as this globe of earth, may turn about by its mere
motion (if there were nothing else) so little a part of the
adjoining air, as is here represented : and yet,
1. The disproportion betwixt the thickness of the earth,
and this, orb of air, is far greater than could be expressed in
the figure, being but as twenty miles ; which is at most the
thickness of this air, unto 3456 miles, which is the semidi-
ameter of our earth, and so is but as an insensible number
in respect of this other.
2. Besides the mere motion of the earth, which in proba-
bility (being such a nigged body) might be enough to carry
so little a part of the air along with it; there is also (as we
suppose) a magnetical vigour whigh proceeds from it.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 213
whereby it is more able to make all things that are near
unto it, to observe the same revolution.
. But if it be so (saith Alex. Ross*.) that not only the
man, but the medium also, and the object be moved : this
must needs be such a great hindrance to the sight, that the
eye cannot judge exactly of any thing. For, suppose the
man alone to be in a motion, he could not see so well as
when he-is still; but now if npt only he, but his spectacles
and book were all moved, he would not be able to discern
any thing distinctly.
I answer: the consequence were pertinent, if all these
were several motions ; but if the subject, and medium, and
object, were all carried with one and the same eqiial mo-
tion, (as it is here supposed) this could be no impediment
to the act of seeing, but it would be all one with the rest-,
because by this means, they are not severed from one ano-
ther, and therefore thfi species are not disturbed. It is an
excellent saying of Galilaeusf* and may serve for the reso-
lution of many such doubts as these : motus eatenus tan»
quant mottis operatur^ guatenus relationem habet ad eas res
qua ipso distituuntur^ in its vero rebus^ qu^ iota aqualiter
de €0 participant^ nihil operatur^ et ita se habet ac si nullus
esstt. If a man be within some room of a ship, he may
read altogether as easily when the ship moves, as when it
stands still.
4. Another argument against this circular motion of the
earth, is grounded upon that common principle amongst
the Aristotelians: unius corporis simplicis unus tantum est
motus. One kind of body has but one kind of motion.
But now the earth and water has a motion of descent; the
air a motion of ascent ; and therefore none of them can
s have any circular motion natural unto them.
I answer: first, these right motions of elementary bodies
belong only to the parts of them, and that too when they
are out of their proper places ; so that the whole to which
they belong, may notwithstanding this, have another mo^-
^ lil?, 1 9ect. 1. cap. 5* f Syst. Mundi, Colloq. 2«
214 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
tion of its own. But secondly, this saying which Aristofle
calls a principle, will not consist with other evident experi-
ments of nature. Thus, though a loadstone, in respect of
its matter and condensity, naturally tends downward ; yet
this does not hinder, but that in respect of some other qua-
lities, as its desire of union and coition to another loadstone,
it may also naturally move upwards. From whence it will
follow, that the same elementary body may have divers na-^
tural motions.
5. The gravity and magnitude of this ea^y globe do
make it altogether unfit for so swift a motion.
I answer : first, heaviness can only be applied unto those
bodies which are out of their proper places, or unto such
parts as are severed from the whole to which they belong.
And therefore the globe of earth, (considered as whole,
and in its right place) cannot truly be called heavy. 1 deny
i^ot, but that there is in it, and so likewise in the other pla-
nets, an ineptitude to motion, by reason of the matter and
condensity of their bodies : and so likewise there is as ti'uly
(though not according to the ^ame degrees) in the least
particle of a material condensed substance: so that this
cannot reasonably be pretended as a just impediment, why
tte earth should be incapable of such a motion. Secondly,
and though this globe be of so vast a magnitude, yet as na-
ture bestows upon other creatures (for instance, an eagle
and a fly) spirits, and motive powers, proportionable to their
several bodies ; so likewise may she endow the earth with
a motive faculty answerable to its greatness. Or if this may
make the earth incapable of so swift a motion as is sup-
posed, much more then will the heavens be disabled for that
greater swiftness which is imagined in them. I might add^
the globe of the sun and Jupiter are observed to move about
their own centres ; and therefore the earth, which is far
less than either of them, is not, by reason of its too great
magnitude, made unfit for such a revolution. Thirdly: as
for the swiftness of the earth's course, it does not exceed
(all circumstances well considered) the celerity of some
p^ier motions, with which we are acquainted; as that of
.t -'
TkAT THE EAATH Sf AY BE A PLANEt. 215
the clouds, when driven by a tempestuous -wind ; that of a
bullet shot from a cannon/Wliich m the space of a minute
does fly four miles*: or as another hath observed, in the
second scruple of an hour it may pass the fifteenth part of a
German mile. Than which, there is not any point in the
earth's equinoctial that moves faster: and though a bullet
be much slower in moving a^ greater distance, yet for so
little a space, while the force of the powder is most fresh
and powerful, it does equal the swiftness of the earth. And
yet,
1. A bullet or cloud is carried in its whole body, being
fain to break its way through the air round about it: but
now the earth, (in respect of this first motion) does remain
still in the same situation, and move only about its own
centre.
2. The motion of a bullet is violent, and against its na-
ture, which does strongly incline it to move downwards:
whereas the earth, being considered as whole, and in its
proper place, is not heavy, nor does it contain any repug-
nancy to a circular motion.
6. The chief argument on which our adversaries do most
insist, is this. If there were such a motion of the earth as
is supposed, then those bodies which are severed from it in
the air, would be forsaken by it f . The clouds would seem
to rise and set as the stars: the birds would be carried
away from their nests : no heavy body could fall perpendi-
cular: an arrow or bullet being shot from east to west by
the same violence, will not be carried an equal distance
from us, but we should by the revolution of our earth,
overtake that which was shot to the east, before it could
fall. If a man leaping up, should abide in the air but one
second scruple of an hour, or the sixtieth part of a minute,
the earth in that space would withdraw itself from him al-
most a quarter of a mile, All these, and many other such
strange inferences, which are directly contrary to sense and
experience, would follow from this motion of the earth.
* Meslin praefat. ad Narrat. Rhet, Fromond. Vesta, tract. 1. cap. 3.
t Arist. de Caelo, lib. 2. cap. 13.
. , If « •
216 THAT THE EARTH MaV^e'^ PLANET.
There are three several ways Sfost -frequently used for
the resolving of these kind of doubts.
1. From tliose magnetical qualities, which all elementary
bodies do partake of.
2. From the like motion of other things, within the room
of a sailing ^p.
3. From the like participation of motion in the open
parts of a ship.
1. For those magnetical properties, with which all these
bodies are endowed. For the better understanding of this,
you must know, that besides those common elementary
qualities of heat, coldness, dryness, moisture, &c. which
arise from the predominancy of several elements, there are
likewise other qualities (not so well known to the ancients)
which we call magnetical, of which every particle in the
terrestrial globe does necessarily participate : and whether
it be joined to this globe by continuity or contiguity, or
whether it be severed from it, as the clpuds in the second
region, a bird, or bullet in the air; yet does it still retain its
magnetical qualities, together with all those operations that
proceed from them.
Now from these properties, do we suppose the circular
^lotion of the earth to arise.
If you ask what probabilities there are, to prove that the
earth is endowed with any such affections ; I answer : it is
likely, that the lower parts of this globe do not consist of
mich a soft fructifying earth, as there is in the surface, (be-
cause there can be no such use for it, as here, and nature
does nothing in vain,^) but rather of some hard rocky sub-
stance ; sin^e we may well conceive, that these lower parts
are pressed close together by the weight of all those heavy
bodies above them. Now it is probable, that this rocky
substance is a loadstone, rather than a jaspis, adamant,
marble, or any other ; because experience teacheth us,
that the earth and loadstone do agree together in so many
properties. Suppose a man were to judge the matter of dii-
vers bodies, each of which should be wrapt up in some co*
yering fri>m his eye, so that he might only examine thgoi ][>y
THAT THE EAETH 1*AY BE A PLANET. 217
some other outward signs : if in this examination he should
find any particular body v^ich had all the properties that
are peculiar to a loadstone, he should in reason conclude it
to be of that nature, rather than any other. Now there is
altogether as much reason why we should infer, that the
inward parts of the earth do consist of a magnetical sub-
stance. The agreement of these two you may see largely
set forth in the treatise of D. Gilbert. I will instance only
in one example; which of itself may sufficiently evidence,
that the globe of earth does partake of the like affections
with the loadstone. In the mariners' needle you may ob-
serve the mafgnetical motions of direction, variation, decli-
nation; the two last of which are found to he different, ac-
cording to the variety of places. Now this diflcrence can-r
not proceed from the needle itself, because that is the same
every where. Nor can we well conceive how it should be
caused by the heavens; for then the variation would not be
always alike in the same place, but diverse, according to
those several parts of the heaven, which at several times
should happen to be over it: and therefore it must neces-
sarily proceed from the earth, which being itself endowed
with magnetical affections, does diversly dispose the motions
of the needle, according to the difference of that disponent
virtue which is in its several parts.
Now to apply this unto the particular instances of the ob-
jection ; we say, though some parts of this great magnet,
the earth, may according to their matter be severed from '
the whole ; yet are they always joined to it by a communion
of the same magnetical qualities; and do no less observe
these kind of motions, whfsn they are separated from the
whole, than if they were united to it. Nor need this seem
incredible, that a heavy bullet, in such a swift violent course,
should be able to observe this magnetical revolution of the
whole earth ; when as we see that those great bodies of
Saturn, Jupiter, &c. hanging in the vast spaces of the aethe-
real air, do so constantly and regularly move on, in their
appointed courses. Though we could not shew any sLtni-
220 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
of the ship ; then may wc easily conceive, that an arrow
or bullet being shot with the same violence, will pass but
the same space on the earth, whether or no it be sfeot to-
wards the east or west.
If a heavy body, while the ship does move, will fail down
in a strait line, then it is not the revolution of our earth
that can hinder a perpendicular descent.
If a man leaping up in a ship, may abide in the air one
second scruple of an hour, and yet this ship in its greatest
swiftness not withdraw itself fifteen foot; then will not the
earth in that space go from him almost a quarter of a mile.
But against this it is objected, that the earth has the simi-
litude of an open ship, and not of any room that is close ^.
And though it be true, that when the roof and che walls do
all move together, the air which is included betwixt them,
must be carried along by the same motion; yet it is not so
with the earth, because that hath not any such walls or roof,
wherein it may contain and carry along with it the n^edium. '
And therefore experience will rather argue against this sup-»
posed revolution. Thus it is observed, that a stone'beiog
let fall from the mast of a ship that moves swiftly, will not
descend to the same point, ^s If the ship did stand still. *
From whence it will follow, that if our earth had such a
circular motion, then any heavy body being let fall from
some high tower, or other steep place^ would not descend
unto that point of earth which was directly under it at thQ
beginning.
To this we answer ; that the air which moves along with
our earth, is as well limited in certain bounds, as that which
is included in a room. If you ask where these bounds are
terminated ; I answer, neither by the utmost parts of the
world, nor yet by the concavity of the moon's orb (as Fro-
mondus would have us affirm ;) but by the sphere of va-
porous air that encompasses our earth; or which is all one,
by the orb of magnetical vigour, which proceeds from it.
And besides, it is considerable that all earthly bodies arc
* Fromondus. Vest. Tract. 2. cap. 2,
t HAt ttlE £ARtH MAY B£ A l^LANET. ^21
not only contained within these limits, as things are in a
close room, but also as parts in that whole to which they
belong.
2. Though the carrying along of the medium may solve
the motion of light bodies in a ship, as the flame of a can-
dle, smoke, or the like^ yet this cannot concur to that
which hath been said of heavy bodies, as a man leaping up,
a bullet descending, &c. since it is not the motion of the
mere air that is able to make these partake of the same
motion with the ship. Unto that argument which he urges
from the experiment of a stone falling in an open ship, we
answer: ^
1 . Though the instance of a ship may serve as a proof for
this opinion, it being an argument a minori ad rnajus, from
an accidental motion to a natural ; yet it will not serve
against it. For though it were not thus in accidental mo-
tions ; yet this would not hinder but that it might be so in
those that are supposed to be proper and natural.
2. As for that experiment itself, it is but a groundless /
im^ination, and was never yet confirmed by any particular
experience ; because it is certain the event would be clean
otherwise, as shall be proved in the third way of answer-
• ing.
S. The third and last way of clearing the doubts in the
sixth argument, is by shewing the like participation of mo-
tion, in those things that are in the open parts of a ship.
To which purpose Galilseus^ urges this experiment: If
any one should let fait a stone from an high mast, he would
find lapidem in eundem seniptr navis locmn decidere^ sen
consistat illa^ seu guaniacungue velocitafe moveatur: that
the stone would always descend 4into the very same place,
whether or no the ship did move or stand still. The rea-^
son of which is, because the motion of the ship is likewise
impressed in the stone : which impression is not equally
prevalent in a light body, as a feather, or wool? because
the air which has power over them, is not carried along by
♦ Sy«t. Mund. Colloq. 2.
522 THAT THE JSARTH MAY B£ A PLAK^T.
the same motion of the ship. Thus likewise will it be in
this other experiment: if a man upon a running horse
should in his swiftest course let fall a bullet or stone» these
heavy bodies, besides their own descent, would also parti-
cipate that transverse motion of the horse. For as those
things that are thrown from us, do continue their motion
when they are out of the hand in the open air j so likewise
must it be when the force is conferred by that motion
which the arm has from the horse. While a man is riding,
his arm is also carried by the same .swiftness of the horse;
therefore, if he should only open his hand and let fall any
thing, it would not descend in a strait line, but must neces-
sarily be driven foiward, by reason of that force impressed
in it by the swiftness of the horse, which is also communi-
cated to the arm; it being all one in effect, whether or no
the arm be moved by a particular mption of its own, as it
is in casting of things from us ; or by the common motion
of the body, as it is in dropping of any thing from us, either
when we are on the top of some sailing ship, as in the
former; or on some running horse, as in this latter in-»
stance.
What hath been said concerning the motion of descents
is likewise appliable, both to that which is upward, ai^d
that which is transversal. So that when it is objected, if
the earth did move, then a bullet that were shot up perpea--
dicularly would be forsaken by it, and not descend to the
place from whence it arose : we answer, that the cannon
which is upon the earth, together with the bullet in it, do
partake of the same circular motion with the earth ; and
this perhaps our adversaries will grant. Whilst we suppose
the bullet to remain stUl in the cannon ; all the difficulty
will be to shew how it must necessarily observe the same
motion, when it is shot out into the open air*. For flic
better explication of this, you may note this following
figure.
* Gall. Syst. CoUoq. 2.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
223
Where we suppose A C to be a cannon perpendicularly*
erected with a bullet in it at B, which if it were immove-
able, we grant that the bullet being discharged, must ascend
in a just perpendicular. But now conceive this cannon to
move along with the earth, then in that space of time while
the bullet by the force of the powder is ascending to the
top of the bore, the cannon will be transferred to the situa-
tion D£; so that the bullet must be moved according to
the line F G, which is not directly upright, but somewhat
declining. Now the motion of the bullet in the air, must
necessarily be conformed unto that direction that is im*
pressed in it by the cannon from whence it is shot, and so
consequently it must be continued according to the line F G,
and therefore will always keep perpendicularly over the
point from which it did ascend.
If you reply, that the motion of the buUeUn the cannon
must needs be so swift, that the earth cannot carry the can-
non from C to E, in the same space of time wherein the
bullet does move from B to A. I answer; it is not mate-
rial whether the earth be of a greater or lesser swiftness
than the bullet, because the declination must always be
proportionable to the motion of the earth ; and if we sup-
pose this to be slower than the bullet, then the declination
of the line F G, will be so much the less.
This truth may yet farther be illustrated by the practice
of those fowlers, who used to kilt birds as they are flying :
224 THAT THE EAB.TH MAY BE A PI-ANET.
concerning which art, it is commonly thought that these
men direct their aims to some certain space in the air, just
before the birds, where they conceive tlie bullet will meet
with them in their flight ; whereas the truth is, they pro-
ceed in this case, the very same way, as if the birds did
stand still, by a direct aiming at their bodies, and following
of their flight by the motion of the piece, till at length,
having got a perifcct aim, they discbarge, and do hit altoge-
ther as surely, as if the birds were sitting upon a tree.
From whence we may observe, that the motion of the
piece, as in our aiming it is made to follow the birds in
their flight (though'it be but slow,} yet is communicated to
the bullet in the air.
But here it may seem very difficolt to give any reason
according to those grounds concerning the flight of birds ,-
which being animated, have a liberty to fly here or there,
to tarry for a good space of time in the open air, and so it
is not easy to conceive what means there is, by which they
should participate of the earth's diurnal revolution.
To this Galilseus answers, that the motion of the air, as
it does turn about the clouds, so doth it also carry with it
the birds, together with such other like things that are in it
For if some violent wind be able to drive with such swift-
ness a full laden ship, to throw down towers, to turn up
trees, and the like ; much more then may the diurnal mo-
tion of the air, (which does so far exceed in swiftness the
most tempestuous wind) be able to carry with it the bodies
of birds.
But if all things be turned about by tins revolution, th^
it should seem there is no such thing as a right motioui
whether of ascent, or descent in a strait line.
■ I answer ; the moving of heavy or light bodies, may be
considered in a double relation.
1. According to the space wherein they move, and we
grant their motions not to be simple, but mixed of a direct
and circular.
2. According to the body or medium wherein they
move, and then they may properly be said to have rlg^t
tHAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 225
motions, because they pass through the medium in a strait
line ; and therefore it is, that unto us they seem directly to
ascend or descend. Aristotle himself would not deny, but
that fire may ascend in a strait line unto its sphere ; and yet
participate also of that circular motion which he supposes
to be communicated from the heaven, unto the upper part
of the air, and its own region. So likewise must it be for
the descent of any thing. Suppose a ship in its swiftest
motion, and a man in it, having some vessel filled with
water, should let fall into it a little ball of wax, or some
other matter which may be slow in its sinking, so that in
one minute it should scarce descend the space of a cubit,
though the ship (it may be) in the same time may pass at
least a hundred cubits; yet would this still seem unto dM
eye to descend in a strait line ; and the other motion which
is communicated unto it by the dhip, w6uld not at all be
discernible in it. And though in this case, the motion
were in itself composed of a circular and direct; yet in i-e-
spect of us it would appear, and so might be stiled, exactly
strait.
Now if it be thus in those which are generally granted to
be preternatural motions'; we fieed not doubt then the
possibility of the like effect in that motion which we con-
ceive to be proper and natural, both to the earth, and the
things that belong unto it.
There is yet another objection to this purpose urged by
Malapertius^, a late Jesuit; who, though he do with much
eagerness press this argument concerning a bullet or stone,
against the opinion of Copernicus ; yet he grants that it
might easily l?e resolved, if the defenders of it would affirai
that the air did move round with the earth. But tliis, say»
he, they dar^ not avouch; for then the comets Would al-
ways seem to stand still, being carried about with the re-
volution of this air; and then they could not rise or set, as
experience shews they do.
To this it may be answered, that most comets are above
Austriaca Syder. par^ 2. prop. 25.
VOL. I. Q^
926 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
that sphere of air which is turned round with our earth, as
is manifest by their height The motion that appears vol
them, is caused by the revolution of our earth, whereby we
are turned from them.
As for those which are within the orb of our air, these
do seem to stand still. Such a* one was that mentioned by
Joscphus^, which did Constantly hangover Jerusalem; and
that likewise which appeared about the time of Agrippa's
death, and for many days together did hang over the city
of Rome. Wherefore Seneca t does well distinguish out
of Epigenes, betwixt two sorts of comets ; the one being
lowy and such as seem immoveable; the other higher, and
such as did constantly observe tlieir risings and settings, as
the stars.
I have done with all the arguments of any note or dif-
ficulty, that are urged against this diurnal motion of the
earth. Many other cavils there are, not worth the naming,
which discover themselves to be rather the objections of a
captious, than a doubtful mind. Amongst which, I might
justly pass over those that are set down by Alex. Rosse];.
But because this author does proceed in his whole discourse
with so much scorn and triumph, it will not be amiss there-
fore to examine what infallible evidence there is in those
arguments upon which he grounds his boastings.
We have in one chapter no less than these nine.
1. If the earth did move, then would it be irotter than
the water, because motion does produce heat: and for this
reason likewise, the water would be so hot and rarified,
that it could not be congealed ; since that also does partake
of the same motion with the earth.
2. The air which is next the earth, would be purer, as
being rarified with motion.
3« If the earth did move the air, it would cause some
sound ; but this is no more Audible, than Pythagoras's har^
mony of the heavens.
• De bello Judaico, i. 7. cap. 12. Dion. 1. 54.
t Nat. Qu. iil^« 7. cap. 6. $ lib. 1. secu 2. cap. 6.
fkAT THE EARTII MAY BE A PLANET. Ht
r
4. It would have been in vain for nature to have endow-
ed the heavens with all conditions requisite for motion, if
they had been to stand still. As first, they have a round
figure. Secondly, they have neither gravity nor levity.
Thirdly, they are incorruptible. Fourthly, they have no
contrary.
5. All similary parts are of the same nature with the
whole : but each part of the earth does rest in its place ;
therefore also doth the whole. -
6. The sun in the world is as the heart in a man^s body ;
but the motion of the heart ceasing, none of the members
do stir: therefore also if the sun should stand still, the other
parts of the world would be without motion.
7. The sun and heavens do work upon these inferior bo^
dies by their light and m9tion. So the moon does operate
upon the sea.
8. The earth is the foundation of buildings, and there-
fore must be firm and stable.
9. It is the constant opinion of divines^ that the heavens
shall rest after the day of judgment; which they proye
from Isa. vi. 20. Thy sun shall no more go down, neither
shall thy moon withdraw itself. So likewise. Rev. x. 6.
The angel swears that there shall be time no longer; and
therefore the heavens must rest, since by their motion it is
that time is measured. And St. Paul says, Rom. viii. 20.
That all the creatures are subject to vanity. Now this can
be no other in the heavens, than the vanity of motion,
which the wise man speaks of, Eccles. i. 4. The sun riseth,
and the sun goeth down, &c.
To these it may be answered :
In the first you may note a manifest contradiction, when
he will have the earth to be hotter than the water, by rea-
son of this motion; when as notwithstanding, he acknow-
ledges the water to move along with it : and therefore too
in ihe next line, he infers that the water, because of that
heat and rarefaction which it receives from this motion
with the earth, must be incapable of so much cold, as to
be congealed into ice.
CL2
S28 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAKTET*
But unto that which may be conceived to be his meaning
in this and the next argument; I answer: if he had fully
understood this opinion which he opposes, he would easily
have apprehended that it could not be prejudiced by either
of these consequences. Fo^ we suppose that not only this
globe of earth and water, but also all the vaporous air
which environs it, are carried along by the same motion.
And therefore, though what he says concerning the heat;
which would be produced by such a motion, were true, yet
it would not be pertinent, since our earth and water, and
the air next unto them, are not by this means severed from
one another, and so do not come within the compass of this
argument.
If any reply, that this will notwithstanding hold tri^ con-
cerning the upper part of the air, where there is such a
separation of one body from another; and so consequently^
an answerable heat. I answer,
1 . It is not generally granted, that motion in all kind of
bodies does produce heat ; some restrain it only to solid bo-
dies, affirming, that in those which are fluid, it is rather the
cause of coldness. 'This is the reason, say they, why run--
ning waters are ever to our sense the coolest; and why,
amongst those winds which proceed from the same coasts
of heaven, about the same time of the year, the strongest
always is the coldest? If you object, that running waters arc
not so soon frozen as others, they answer; this is not be-
cause they are thereby heated, but because unto congela-
tion it is requisite that a body should settle and rest, as
well as be cold.
2. If we should grant a moderate heat in tho>se parts of
the air, we have not any experiment to the contrary, nor
would it prejudice the present opinion, or common prin-
ciples.
As tlie sound of this motion is not more heard than the
harmony of the heavens ; so neither is there any reason
why this motion should cause a sound, more than the sup-
posed motion of the heavens, which is likewise thought to
be continued unto the air hard by us.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 229
This will provfe the earth to move as well as the heavens:
for that has, first, a round figure, as is generally granted.
Secondly, being considered as whole, and in its proper
place, it is not heavy, as was proved before. And as for
the two other conditions, neither are they true of the hea-
vens, nor if they were, would they at all conduce to their
motion.
1. This argument would prove that the sea did not ebb
and How, because there is not the same kind of motion in
every drop of water; or that the whole earth is not sphe-
rical, because every little piece of it is not of the same
form.
This is rather an illustration than a proof; or if it do
prove any thing, it may serve as- well for that purpose unto
which it is afterward applied, where the motion of every
planet is supposed to depend upon the revolution of the
sun.
That the sun and planets do work upon the earth by their
own real daily motion, is the thing in question ; and there-
fore must not be taken for a common ground.
We grant that the earth is &cm and stable firom all such
motions whereby it is joggled or uncertainly shaken.
1. For the authority of those divines, which he urgfes for
the interpretation of these scriptures; this will be but a
weak argument against that opinion which is already
granted to be a paradox.
2. The scriptures themselves, in their right meaning,
will not at all conduce to the present purpose.
As for that in Isaiah, if we consult the coherence, we
shall find that the scope of the prophet is to set forth the
glory of the church triumphant. Wherein he says there
shall not be any need of the sun or moon, but God's pre-
sence shall supply them both : for the Lord shall be unto
thee an everlasting light, and thy God thy glory, ver. 19.
and as for this sun and moon, it shall not go down, or
withdraw itself, but he shall be an everlasting light with-
out intcrmissien. So that it i3 evident he speaks of
230 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET*
t\i9t light which shall hereafter be instead of the sun imd
mqon *.
As for that in the Revelations, we yield that time shall
cease; but to say that this depends upon the cessation of
the heavens, is to beg the question, and to suppose that
wliich is to b^ proved ; viz, that time is measured by the
motion of the heavens, and not o^ the earth. Perreriusf
(from whom this last argument was borrowed without ac-
Juiowledgment) might have to}4 hina in the very saiae place,
that time does not absolutely and upivefsally depend upoii
^e motion of the heavens^ sed in motu et successione, cu^
juslibet duraftonis, but in any such succession, by whicl^
duration piay be, measured.
As for tbat in the Romans, we say, that there are othef
vanities to whiph the heavenly bodies are svibject: as first,
VTito many changes ^nd alterations ; witness those comets
which at several times have been discerned amongst them;
^nd then likewise to that general corruption, in which all
the creatures shall be involved at the last day. When
they shall pass away with a great noise, and the element^
shall melt with fei-vent he^tj.
Thus you 3ee, there i^ not any such invincible strength
in these arguments, as might cause the author of them to
triumph before-hand with any great noise of victory.
Another gbjection like unto ^ese is taken fronj the etyr
mology of several words. Thus the heavens are called
^thercti ab m ^f^Vy because they are always in motion, and
the earth Ve%ta^ guivi siaty because of its immobility.
To which I answer; it we^e no difficult matter to find
.^uch proofs for thi^ opinion, as \f ell a^ againit it.
Thus we may say that the Hebrejv word io** is derived
fjrom )pr\ quia currii ; and terra^ non quod terratuf^ sed quo4
perenni cursu pmni^ terat^ saith Calcagnius. However,
tjitpygl^ wp suppose the etymology to be never so true andj
♦ Vid. Bevel, xxi. S3.]teinxxii. 5.
I Gen. c 1, 1.2. quaeit. ^ %2 Pe^, iii, IQj, 1%
• .>
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET- 231
«
genuine, yet it can at the best but shew what the more
common opinion was of those times when such names were
first imposed. '
But suppose all this were so, that the earth had such a
diurnal revolution ; yet how is it conceivable that it should
at the samie time have two distinct motions ?
I answer : this may easily be apprehended, if you con-
sider how both these motions do tend the same way from
west to east. Thus a bowl being turned out of the hand,
has two motions in the air; one, whereby it is carried
round ; the other, whereby it is cast forward.
From what hath been delivered in this chapter, the in-
different reader may gather some satisfaction for those ar-
gunjents which are usually urged against this diurnal motion
of the earth.
s
PROP. IX.
Thai it is more probable the earth does move^ than the sur^
or heavens.
AMONGST those many arguments that may be urged
for the confirmation of this truth^ I shall set down
only these five.
1 . If we suppose the earth to be the cause of this motion,
then will those vast and glorious bodies of the heavens be
freed from that inconceivable, unnatural swiftness, which
must qtherwise be attributed unto them.
For if the diurnal revolution be in the heavens, then it
will follow according to the common hypothesis*, that
each star in the equator must in every hour move at the
least 4529538 German miles. So that according to the
observation of Cardan t> who tells us that the pulse of ^
* Vid. Mesl. Epit. Astr. I. l.in fine.
\ De Prop, 1. 5. prpp. 58.
I .
2S2 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLAIVBT*
well-tempered man does beat 4000 times in an houTt one of
these stars in that space, whilst the pulse beats once, must
pass 1132 German miles (saith Alphraganus :) or according
tp Tycho, 732 German miles. But these numbers seem to
be somewhat of the least, and therefore many others do
much enlarge them, affirming that every star in the equator,
in one beating of the pulse, must move 252S of these
miles.
It is the assertion of Clavius *, that though the distance
of the orbs, and so consequently their swiftness, seem to be
altogether incredible ; yet it is rather far greater in itself
than astronomers usually suppose it ; and yet saith he, ac-^
cording to the common grounds, every star in the equator
must move 42398437 i niiles in an hour. And though a
man should constantly travel forty mile^a day, yet he would
not be able to go so far as a star does in one hour, under
2904 years : or if we wiH suppose an arrow to be of the
same swiftness, then must it compass this great globe of
earth and water 1884 times in an hour. And a bird that
could but fly as fast, might go round the world seven times
in that space, whilst one could say, Ave Maria^ gratia pleruh
Dominus tecum.
Which though it be a pretty round pace, yet you must
conceive that all this is spoken only of the eighth sphere ;
and so being compared to the swiftness of the prwtum mo^
bile, is but a slow and heavy motion.
For (saith the same author) the thickness of each
orb is equal to the distance of its concave superficies from
the cciiLre of the earth. Thus the orb of the moon docs
contain as much space in its thickness, as there is betwixt
the nearest parts of th^t and the centre. Thus also the
eighth sphere is as thick as that whole space betwixt the
centre of the e^rth and its own concave superficies. So
likewise must it be in those three other orbs, which he sup,
pbses to be above the starry heaven. Now if we propor*
tlQn their swiftness according to this difference in th^ii^
^ Cominent. m prim. cap. Sphaera«
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 233
bigness, you may then conceive (if you can) what a kind of
celerity that must be, by which the primum mobile will be
whirled about.
Tycho makes the distance of the stars to be much less,
and their motion slower ; and yet he is fain to confess, that
it is mnni cogitatione celej'ior*
Clavius likewise speaking concerning the swiftness of the
starry orb, does acknowledge, Stiod velociias ejus captum
huniani ingenii exeedit. What then could he think of the
primum mobile ?
Dr. Gilbert * being it seems astonished at the conside*
ration of this strange swiftness, says of it, that it is mottis
supra omnes cogitatiojieSy somnia^/abulas if licentias poeticas
insuperabiliSf ineffabilisy incoinprekensibilis, A man may
more easily conceive the possibility of any fable or fiction,
how beasts and trees might talk together, than how any
material body should be moved with such a swiftness.
Not but that it is possible for God to turn them about
with a far greater velocity. Nay it is possible for art to
contrive a motion, which shall be equally slow in that pro-
portion as this is swift. But however, the question here is
not what can be done, but what is most likely to be done
according to the usual course of nature. It is the part of
a philosopher, in the revolution of natural events, not to, fly
ynto the absolute power of God, and tell us what he can do,
but what according to the usual way of providence is most
likely to be done, to find out such causes of tilings, as may
seem most easy and probable to our reason.
If you ask what repugnancy there is in the heavens, unto
so great a swiftness: we answer, their being such vast ma-
t^rial condensed substances, with which this inconceivable
motion cannot agree.
Since motion and magnitude are two such geometrical
things, as bear a mutual proportion to one another ; there-
fore it may seem convenient, that slowness ghotild be more
agreeable to a great bddy, and swiftness to a lesser : and so
li should be more consonant to the principles of nature, that
• De laagnete, 1. 6. c. 3.
234 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANJET.
the earth, which is of a lesser quantity, should be appointed *
to such a motion as^ is somewhat proportionable to its big-
ness, than that the heavens that are of such a vast magni-
tude, should be whirled about with such an incredible swift-
ness, which does as far exceed the proportion of their
bigness, as their bigness does exceed this earth, that is but a
point or centre to them. It is not likely that nature in these
constant and great works, should so much deviate from
that usual harmony and proportion which she observes in
lesser matters. If this globe of earth only were appointed
to move every day round the orb of the fixed stars, though
it be but a little body, and so more capable of a swift mo-
tion ; yet that swiftness would be so extremely dispropor^
tionable unto it, that we could not with reason conceive it
possible, according to the usual course of nature. But now
that the heavens themselves, of such strange bigness, with
so many stars, which do so far exceed the magnitude of our
earth, should be able to turn about with the same celerity ,
oh ! it is altogether beyond the fancy of a poet or a mad-
man*
For answer unto this argument, our adversaries tell us!
that there is not in the heavens any repugnancy to so swifi
a motion $ and that whether we consider the nature of those
bodies ; or, secondly, the swiftness of this motion.
I. For the nature of those bodies, either C Qualities,
their 1 Quantity.
1. There is not in them the qualities of lightness or hea-
viness, or any the least contrariety that may make them
reluctant to one another.
2. Their magnitude will help them in their swiftness ♦ :
for the greater any body is, the quicker will it be in its
motion, and that not only when it is moved by an inward
principle, as a millstone will descend faster than a little
pebble ; but also when its motion does proceed from some
external agibt ; as the wind will drive a great cloud, or a
Ixeavy ship, when it is not able to stir a little stone^
* Koss. 1. 1. sect. 1. c. I,
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PtANET. 2M
II. As for the swiftness of this rdotion, the possibility of it
may be illustrated by other particulars in nature : as,
1. The sound of a cannon, in a little time is carried for
twenty miles distance *.
2. Though a star be situated so remotely from us, yet the
eye discerns it in a moment, which is not without some mo-»
tion, either of the species of the star, or the rays of the
eye. Thus also the light does in an instant pass from one
side of the heaven to another f.
V I. If the force of powder be abl^ to carry a bullet with
so great a swiftness, we need not doubt then^ but that
the hp^ve^s are capable of such a celerity a3 is usually
attributed unto them.
Unto these it may be answered :
1. Where they say that the heavenly bodies are without
all gravity, we grant it, in the same sense as our earth also,
l^eing considered as whole, and in its proper place, may be
denied to be heavy : Since this quality in the exactest sense»
C?an only be ascribed unto such parts as are severed from the
whole to which they belong. But however, since th^
heavens or stars are of a material substance, it is impossible
but there should be in them some ineptitude to motion ;
because matter is of itself a dull and sluggish thing'; and by.
so ipucl^ the more, as it is kept close and condensed toge«>
then And though the followers of Ptolemy do with mucl|
confidence deny the heavens to be capable of any reluctancy
to motion, yet it were easy to prove the contrary out of
^eir own principles. It is not conceivable how the upper
sphere should move the nether, unless their superficies
were full of rugged parts (which they deny) : or el$e one
qf the orbs must lean upon tl^e other with its weight, an4
so make it partake of its own motion. And besides, they
tell us, that the farther any sphere is distant from the prU^
n^tim mobile^ the less it is hindered by that in its proper
pourse, and the sooner does it finish its own revolution.
f i^sfi L ^. sect. 1. c. 5. t lien^f 1* 1* tec^, 1. c* S*
^
336 THAT THB EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
From whence it will easily follow, that these bodies have
resistency from one another.
I have often wondered why amongst the enchanted
buildings of the poets, they have not feigned any castle to
be made of the same materials with the solid orbs, suice in
such a fabric there would have been these eoiinent coavc*
niences.
1- It mpst needs be very pleasant; by reason of its per-
spicuity, because it is more diaphanous than the air itseifjr
and so the walls of it could not hinder the prospect any way.
2. Being so solid and impenetrable, it must needs be ex-
cellent against all violence of weathers, as also against the
assaults of the enemy, who should not be able to break it
with the most furious batteries of the ram, or pierce it with
9ny cannon shot.
3. Being void of all heaviness, a man may carry it up and
down with him, as a snail does his house ; and so whether
he follow the enemy, or fly from him, he has still this ad-
vantage, that he may take his castle and defence along with
him.
But then againt there are on the other side as many in-
conveniencies. For,
1 . Its perspicuity would make it so open, that a man
should not be able to retire himself into any private part of
it. And then,
2. Being so extremely solid, as well as invisible, a man
should be still in danger of knocking his head against every
wall and pillar ; unless it were also intangible, as some of
the peripatetics affirm.
3. Its being without all gravity, would bring this incon-
venience, that every little pufFof wind would blow it up and
down ; since some of the same sect are not ashamed to say,
that the heavens are so utterly devoid of heaviness, that if
but a little fly sfeould jostle against the vast frame of the ce-
lestial spheres, he would move them out of tlieir places.
A strong fancy, that could be at leisure, might make eX*
cellent sport with this astronomical fiction.
YliA^ THE EARTH MAY BE A i*LANET. S$i
»
^0 that this first evasion of our adversaries will not shelter
them from the force of tl^at argument, which is taken from
the incredible swiftness of the heavens.
2. Whereas they tell us in the second place, that a bigger,
body, as a millstone, will naturally descend swifter than a
less, as a pebble. I answer : this is not because such a
great body is in itself more easily moveable, but because the
bi^er any thing is which^ is out of its own place, the
stronger will be its natural desire of returning thither, and
so consequently, the quicker its motion. But now those
bodies that move circularly, are always in their proper si-
tuations, and so the same reason is not appliable unto them.
And then, whereas it is said, that magnitude does always
add'to the swiftness of a violent motion (as wind will move
a great ship sooner than a little stone : we answer : this is not
because a ship is more easily moveable in itself than a little
stone : for I suppose the objector will not think he can throw
the One as far as the other ; but because these- little bodies
are not so liable to that kind of violence from whence their
motion does proceed.
As for those instances, which are cited to illustrate the
possibility of this swiftness in the heavens, we answer: the
passage of a sound is but very slow in comparison to the
motion of the heavens. And then besides, the swiftness of
the species of sound or sight which are accidents, are not
fit to infer the like celerity in a material substance : and so
likewise for the ligfit which Aristotle himself *, and with
him the generality of philosophers, do for this very reason
prove not to be a body, because it moves with such swift-
ness, of which (it seems) they tlxought a body to be inca-
pable. Nay, the objector t himself in another place,
speaking of light in reference to a substance, does say :
Lumen est accidens^ sic species ret 'visa^ H alia est ratio
substantiarunfiy alia accidentiurn.
To that of a bullet, we answer : he might as well have
illustrated the swiftne^ of a bullet, which will pass four or
five miles in two minutes, by the motion of a hand in a
* De Anima, L 3. c. 7. t ^os9. 1. 2. sect. 1. c. 4.
at TtXAT tHE EARTR MAY it A PLAKEf.
watch, which passes two or three inches in twelve houts ;
there being a greater disproportion betwixt the motion of
the heavens and the swiftness of a bullet, than there is be-
twixt the swiftness of a bullet and the motion of a hand in
a watch.
Another argument to this purpose may )ie taken firom
the chief end of the diurnal and annual motions, which is
to distinguish betwixt night and day, winter and summer ;
and so consequently, to serve for the commodities and s^-
sons of the habitable world. Wherefore it may seem more
agreeable to the wisdom of providence, for to make the
earth as well the efficient, as the final cause of this motion;
especially since nature in her other operations does never
use any tedious difficult means to perform that which may
as well be accomplished by shorter and easier ways. But
now, the appearances would be the same, in respect of us,
if only this little point of earth were made the subject of
these motions, as if the vast frame of the world, with all^
those stars of such number and bigness were moved about it.
It is a common maxim, MviSev etxyi n^v (pvtrtv epyct^ea^tu *.
Nature does nothing in vain, but in all her courses does take
the most compendious way. It is not therefore (I say) '
likely, that the whole fabric of the heavens, which do so
much exceed our earth in magnitude and perfection, should
be put to undergo so great and constant a work in the ser-
vice of our earth, which might more easily save all that la-
bour by the circumvolution of its own body ; especially,
since the heavens do not by this motion attain any farther
perfection for themselves, but are made thus serviceable to
this little ball of earth. So tliat in this case it may seem to
argue as much improvidence in nature to employ them in
this motion, as it would in a mother f? who in warming hef
child, would rather turn the fire about that, than that about
the fire : or in a cook J, who would not roast his meat by
turning it about to the fire ; but rather, by turning the fire
about it : or in a man ||, who ascending some high tower, to
* Galen. f Laniberg. J Keplar. |i GaliL
TMAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET, S3d
save the labour of stirring his head, should rather desire that
all the regions mighjt successively be turned before his eye,
that so he might easily take a view of them.
We allow every watchmaker so much wisdom as not to
put any motion in his instrument, which is superfluous, or
may be supplied an easier way : and shall we not think
that nature has as much providence as every ordinary me^
chanic ? or can we imagine that she should appoint those
numerous and vast bodies, the stars, to compass us with
such a swift and restless motion, so full of confusion and
uncertainties, when as all this might as well be done by the
revolution of this little ball of earth ?
Amongst the several parts of the world, there are six
planets which are generally granted to move. As for the
sun and the earth, and the fixed stars, it is yet in question,
which of them are naturally endowed with the same con-*
dition. Now common reason will dictate unto us, that
motion is most agreeable to that which in kind and proper-
ties, is most near to those bodies that undoubtedly are
moved. But now there is one eminent qualification^
wherein the earth does agree with the planets ; whereas
the sun, together with the fixed stars, do in the same respect
differ from them : and that is light, which all the planets,
and so too the earth, are fain to borrow elsewhere, whilst
the sun and the stars have it of their own. From whence
it may be probably concluded, that the earth is rather the
subject of this motion than the other. To this it may be
added, that the sun and stars seem to be of a more excellent
nature than the other parts of the world ; and therefore
should in reason be endowed with the best qualifications.
But now motion is not so noble a condition as rest. That
is but a kind of wearisome and servile thing ; whereas, this
is usually ascribed to God himself: of whom it is said :
Immotus stabilisque manens dans cuncta moveri*,
Aristotle t tells us, it is very agreeable to reason that
the time appointed for the revolution of each orb should
* Boet. de ConsoL Phil. 13, fDe Coelo, 1 2. c ip.
'240 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
be proportionable to its bigness. But now this can only be
by making the earth a planet, and the subject of the annual
and diurnal motions. Wherefore it is probable, that this
does rather move than the hearens.
According to the common hypothesis, the primum mth
bile will move round in a day. Saturn in thirty years.
Jupiter In twelve.' Mars in two. The Sun, Venus, and
Mercury, which have several orbs, yet will agree in their
revolutions, being each of them about a year in finishiif
their courses : whereas by making the earth a planet, there
will be a just proportion betwixt the bigness of the orbs and
the time of their motions : f6r then, next t6 the sun or cen-
tre, there will be the sphere of Mercury ; which as it is but
narrower in its diameter, so likewise is it quick in its. mo*
tion, running its course in 88 days. Venus, that is next
unto it, in 224 days. The earth in 365 days, or a year.
Mars in 687 days, Jupiter in 4332 days, Saturn in 10759
days. Thus likewise is it with those Medicean stars that
encompass Jupiter. That which is lowest amongst them,
finishes his course in two and twenty hours ; the next in
three days and a half ; the third in seven, days ; and the
farthest in seventeen days. Now as it is (according to
Aristotle's confession) more likely that nature should ob*
serve such a due. proportion betwixt tlie heavenly orbs ; so
is it more probable, that tlie earth should move, rather than
the heavens.
This may likewise be confirmed from the appearance of
comets: concerning which there are three things com-
monly granted, or if they were not, might be easily proved :
namely,
1. That there are divers comets in the air, betwixt the
moon and our eartli.
2. That many of these comets do seem to rise and set as
the stars.
3. That this appearing motion is not properly their own,
but communicated unto them from somewhat else.
But now, this motion of theirs cannot be caused by the
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET 341
Iieavens ; and therefore it must necessarily proceed from
the revolution of our earth.
That the moon's orb cannot carry aloi\g with it the
greater part of the air, wherein these comets are placed,
might easily l)p proved from the Common grpuuds. For
the concave superficies of that sphere is usually supposed to
be exactly terse and smooth ; so that the meer touch of it
cs^nnot turn about the whole element of iire, with a motion
that is not natural unto il;. Nor could this elementary firej
which they imagine to be of a more rarified and subtle nar
ture, communicate the same motion to the thicker air, and
that to the waters (as some affirm:) for by what means
could that smooth orb take hold of the adjoining air? To
this Sarsius answers, that there are great gibbosities apd
mountainous inequalities in the concavity of the lowest
sphere, and by these is it enabled to carry along with it the
£reand air. But Fromondus * tells him, Fictiiia-Mfa l^
adfugam reperta sunt. And yet his own conjecture is
scarce $0 good, when he affirms, that this motion of the
aethereal air, as also of that elementary air hard by us, is
caused by that rgggedness which there is in the bodies of
the planfets ; of which opinion we may with as good reason
say as he says to Sarsius, ficlitia isia 5f ad fttgam reperta :
these things are mere fictions invented for shifts, and with-
out aijy probable ground.
But now this appearance of the comets may easily be
resolved, if we suppose the earth to, move. For then,
though they did still remain in their wonted places ; yet.
this, by its diurnal revolution successively withdrawing it-
self from them, tlaey wili appear to rise and set. And
therefore, according to this common natural experiment, it
is more probable tliat the earth should move, than the
heavens.
Another argument urged by some to prove that this
globe of .earth is easily moveable, is taken from the opinion
of those who affirm tlaat the access of any weight unto a
,% Antar. cap. 16.
.ft
VOL. I. R
i43 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
new place *, as suppose an army, does make the earth
poise itself afresh, and change the centre of gravity that it
had before : but this is not generally granted ; and there-
fore not to be insisted on as a common ground.
To this purpose likewise is that inference of Lansbergius,
who from Archimedes his saying, that he could move the
earth, if he knew where to stand and fasten his insttument;
concludes, that the earth is easily moveable ; whereas it was
the intent of Archimedes in that speech, to shew the infi-
nite power of engines : there being no weight so great, but
that an instrument might be invented to move iL
Before we finish this chapter, it is requisite tiuit we in-
quire what kind of faculty that is from which these motions
that Copernicus ascribes unto the earth, do proceed:
whether or no it be some animal power, that does assist (as
Aristotle) or inform (as Keplar thinks,) or else some other
natural motive quality which is intrinsical unto it.
We may observe, that when the proper genuine cause of
any motion is not obvious, men are very prone to attribute
unto that which they discern to be the most frequent origi-
nal of it in other things, life. Thus the stoics affirm the
soul of the water to be the cause of the ebbing and flowing
of the sea. Thus others think the wind to proceed from the
life of the air, whereby it is able to move itself several ways,
as other living creatures f. And upon the same grounds
do the Platonics, Stoics, and some of the Peripatetics, affirm
tlae heavens to be animated. From hence likewise it is,
that so many do maintain Aristotle his opinion concerning
intelligences ; which some of his followers, the schoolmen,
do confirm out of scripture, from that place in Matthew
xxiv. 29. where it is said, the powers of the heavens shall
be shaken. In which words, by powers (say they) are
^ meapt the angels, by whose power it is, that the heavens are
moved. And so likewise in that. Job ix. 13. where the
vulgar has it, sub qiw curvaniur^ qui portant orbem ; that is,
<* Vid. Vasq. 1. 1, diff. 2. cap. 8. 16.
t Sen. Nat. Quest. 1. 5. cap. 5, 6.
tHAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 243
the intelligences. Which text might serve altogether as *
Well, to prove the fable of Atlas and Hercules. Thus
Cajetan concludes from that place irt the PSaliii cxixvL 5.
where it is said, " God by wisdom made the heavens ; of
according to the vulgar, Qui fecit coelos intellectUy that the
heavens are moved by an intelligent soul.
If we consider the original of this opinion, we shall find it
to proceed from that mistake of Aristotle, who thought the
heavens to be eternal ; and therefore to require such a mov-
ing cause, as being of an immaterial substance, might be
exempted from all that weariness and inconstancy which
other things are liable unto.
But now this ground of his is evidently false, since it is
certain that the heavens had a beginning, and shall have art
end. However, the employing of angels in these motions
of the world, is both superfluous, and very improbable. .
1 . Because a natural power, intrinsical to those bodies,
will serve the turn as well. And as for other opei^ations,
which are to be constant and regular, nature does com-
monly make use of some inward principle.
2. The intelligences being immaterial, cannot immedi-
ately work upon a body ; nor does any one tell us what
instruments they should make use of in this business.
They have not any hands to take hold of the heavens, or
turn them about. And that opinion of Aquinas, Durand,
Soncinus, with other schoolmen, seems to be without all
reason ; who make the faculty whereby the angels move
the orbs, to be the very same with their understandings
and will : so that if an angel do but merely suspend the
act of willing their motion, they must necessarily stand
still : and on the contrary, his only willing them to move,
shall be enough to carry them about in their several courses:
since it were then a needless thing for providence to have
appointed angels unto this business, which might have been
done as well by the only will of God. And besides, how
are the orbs capable of perceiving this will in the intelli-
gences ? Or if they were, yet what motive faculty have they
of themselves, which can enable them to obey it ? .
R 2
244 THAT THE BAJITH MAY BE A l^LAKET.
Now as it would be with the heavens, so likewi^ is it
with the earth, which may be turned about in its diurnal
revolution, without the help of intelligences, by som6 motive
power of its own, that may be intrinsical unto it.
If it be yet inquired, what cause there is of its annual
motion : I answer ; it is easily conceivable, how the same
principle may serve for both these, since they tend the
same way from west to east.
However, that opinion of Keplar is not very improbable,
that all the primary planets are moved round by the sun,
which once in twenty-five or twenty-six days, does observe
a revolution about its own axis, and so carry along the pla-
nets that encompass it ; which planets are therefore slower
or swifter, according to their distances from him. If you
ask by what means the sun can produce such a motion ?
he answers ; by sending forth a kind of magnetic virtue in
strait lines, from each part of its body ; of which there is
always a constant succession : so that as soon as one beam
of this vigour has passed a planet, there is another presently
takes hold of it, like the teeth of a wheel.
But how can any virtue hold out to such a distance ?
He answers : first, as light and heat, together with those
other secret influences which work upon minerals in the
bowels of the earth ; so likewise may the sun send forth a
magnetic, motive virtue, whose power may be continued to
the farthest planets. JSecondly, if the moon, according to
common philosophy, may move the sea, why then may not
the sun move this globe of eailh ?
In such queries as these, we can conclude only from
conjectures: that speech of the wise man, Eccles. iii. 11.
being more especially verified of astronomical questions
Iconcerning the frame of the whole universe, that no man
can find out the works of God from the beginning to the
end. Though we may discern divers things in the world,
which may argue the infinite wisdom and power of the au-
thor, yet therv^ will be always some particulars left fpr our
dispute and inquiry, and we shall never be able with all our
industry, to attain a perfect comprehension of the crea*
ffHAT THE BARTH MAY BE A* PLANET. 245
tures, or to find them wholly out, from the beginning to the
end.
The providence of God having thus contrived it *,
that so man might look for another life after this, when alt
his longing and thirst shall be fully satisfied. For since no
liatural appetite is in vain, it must necessarily follow, that
there is a possibility of attaining so much knowledge as shall
be commensurate unto these desires ; which because it is
not to be had in this world, it will behove us then to expect
wd provide for another.
prop; X.
That this hypothesis is exactly agreeable to common ap-
pearances.
IT hath been already proved, that the earth is capable of
such a situation and motion as this opinion supposes it to
have. It remains, that in the last place we shew how
agreeable this would be unto those ordinary seasons of days,
pionths, years, and all other appearances in the heavens.
1. As for the difference betwixt days and nights; it i^
evident, that this may be as well cauised by the revolution of
the earth, as the motion of the sun ; since the heavenly
bodies must needs seem after the same manner to rise and
set, whether or no they themselves by their own motion,
do pass by our horizon and vertical point ; or whether our
horizon and vertical point, by the revolution of our earth,
do pass by them. According to that of Aristotle +, aJfV
hot^Bqsi amiv rviv o\p/v i( ro opciofjievoVj there will not appear
any difference, whether or no the eye be moved from the
object, or the object from the eye. And therefore I cannot
chuse but wonder that a man of any reason or sense, should
♦ Valtes. lacr. Philos. c. 64. t De Coelo, lib. 2. cap. 8.
24? THAT TI|£ EAUTH MAY BE A PLANET.
make choice of no better an argument to conclude his book
withal, than that which we read at the latter end of
AI. Rosse» where he infers, tliat the earth does not move,
because then the shadow in a sun-dial would not be al-
tered.
2. As for the difference of iponths, we say, that the dir
verse illumination of the mpQn,the diflSprent bigness of her
body, her remaining for a longer or shorter time in the
earth's shadow, when she is eclipsed, &c. may well enough
be solved by supposing her to move above our earth, in an
eccentrical epicycte. Thus,
In which kind of hypothesis, there will be a double dif?
fercnce of motion ; the one caused by the different situa-r
tions of the moon's body, in its own eccentric ; the other
by the different situations of the moon's orb, in the earth's
eccentric : which is so exactly answerable to the motions
and appearances of this planet, that from hence Lansber-
gius draws an argument for this system of the heavens,
which in the strength of his confidence he calls, demonstror-
tionem exi crrvifjuovtKviVf cut nulla ratione potest contradict.
4. As for the difference betwixt winter and summer ;
betwixt the number and length of days, which appertain to
fsach of those seasons ; the seeming motion of the sun from
pne sign to another in the zodiac i all this may easily be
THAT THE EA^LTH MAY BE A PLAKET. 247'
solvedt.by supposing the eaith to move in an ecccntricaJ
orb about the sun. Thus,
Suppose file earth to be at C, then the sun at A will seem
to be in the sign ®, and at the greatest distance from us,
because the earth is then in the farthest part of its eccen-
tric. When after by its annual motion it hath passed suc-
eessively by the signs asXvH n, at length it comes to
the other solstice at B, where the sun will appear in VS, and
M^mrbiggest, as being in its perige, because our earth in
then in the nearest part of its eccentric.
• r' As for all other appearances of the sun which concern
the annual motion, you may see by the foUowing %ure,
Jjiat they are exactly agreeable to this hypothesis.
Where you have the earth described about the sun at 'A,
in Uie four chief points of the zodiac j namely, the two
1W8 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A ^LAKETi
equinoctials at T and -^, and the solstices at ^fS and ©.
Through all which points the earth does pass in his aimoal
motion from west to east.
The axis upon which our earth does move, is represented
by the line B C, which axis does always decline from that
of the ecliptic, about 23 degrees, 30 minutes. The points
B C are imagined to be the poles, B the north-pole, and C
the south.
Now if we suppose this earth to turn about its own axis
by a diurnal motion, then every point of it will describe a
paraHlei circle, which will be either bigger eft lesser, accord-
ing to its distance from the poles. The chief of them are
the equinoctial D, E. The two tropic^, F, G ; and H, I,
the two polar circles. M, N, the arctit, and K, L» the ant-
arctic ; of which the equinoctial only is a grfsat cjicle, and
therefore wlH ahrays be equaHy divided by ti>6 fiiie'Of iSu-
mination M, L, whereas the other parallels are (hereby .dis^
tributed into unequal parts. Amongst which j^artSy thd
diurnal arches of those that are towards B, the n6rlh pofe^
are bigger than the nocturnal, when our earth is in ^fS and
the sun appears in ^ : insonruch, that the whole arctic cii^*
cle is enlightened, and there is day for half a year together
under that pole.
Now when the earth proceeds to, the othdr solstice at ®,
and the sun appears in Vrf, then that hemisphere must be
involved in darkness, which did before partake of light.
And those parallels towards the north and south poles will
still be divided by the sam^ inequality. But those bigger
parts which were before enlightened, will not be darkened,
d vice versa. As when the earth was in N, the arptic cir-
cle M,N, was wholly enlightened, and the antarctic, K, L,
altogether in the dark. So now, when it is in A, the ant-
arctjc K, L, will be >¥holly in the light, and the,,ather M,
N, altogether obscured. Whereas the suti before was ver-
tical to the inhabitants at the tropic F, G ; so now is he in
the same situation to those that live under the other tropic|^
H, I. And whereas before the pole did incline 23 de-
grees 30 minutes towaxds the soiiy so jqow does it decline
THAT THE EART<I MAY BS A PLANET.
M9
as much from him. The whole difference will amount to
47 degrees, which is the distance of one tropic from the
other.
But now in the two other figures, when the earth is in
either of the equinoctials V «^, the circle of illumination
will pass through both the poles, and therefore must divide
all the parallels into equal parts. From whence it will foi-*
low, that the day and night must then be equal in all places
of the world.
As the earth is here represented in =^, it turns only the
enlightened part towards us : as it is in T we see its noc*
turnal hemisphere.
So that according to this hypothesis, we may easily and
exactly reconcile every appearance concerning the diffe*
rence betwutt days and nights, winter and summer, toge-
ther with.jdl those other varieties which depend upon
them.
If you would know how the planets (according to the
system of the heavens) will appear direct, stationary, re-
trograde ; and yet still move regularly about their own cen-
tres, you may plainly discern it by this following diagram.
250 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
■Whcre suppose the sun to be at A, the circle (B, G, M)
to be the orb of the earth's motion, and that above it noted
with the same letters, to be the sphere of Jupiter; and the
uppermost of all, to be a part of the zodiac in the starry
heaven.
Now if you conceive the letters ABCDEFGHIKL
M, and hcdejghiklm, to divide the earth's orb and
that of Jupiter, into several parts, proportionable to the
slowness or swiftness of their different motions (Jupiter
finishes his course in twelve years, and the earth In one)
then supposing the earth to be at the point (B) and Jnpiter
likewise in his orb to be situated at (6,) he will appear unto
us to be in the zodiac at the point (r.) But afterwards
both of them moving forwards to the letter (C c) Jupiter
wiU seem to be in the zodiac at (v,) as having paued di-
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 2Sl
tcctly forward according to the order of the signs. And so
likewise each of them being transferred to the places (D d)
(E e) Jupiter will still appear direct, and to have moved in
the zodiac unto the points (y z.) But now when the earth
comes to be more immediately interposed betwixt this pla-
net and the sun ; as when both of them ajre at the letter
(F/) then will Jupiter be discerned in the zodiac at (jr.) So
that all the while the earth was passing the arch (E F) Ju-
piter did still remain betwixt the points {z) and (jr,) and
therefore must seem unto us as if he were stationary ; but
afterwards both of them being carried to (G^,) then Jupiter
will appear at (s,) a3 if by a hasty motion he had returned
from his former course the space {x s.) Both of them pass-
ing to (HA,) this planet will still seem to be swiftly retror
grade, and appear in the point at (/?,) but when they come
to the points (I/,) Jupiter will then seem to be slower in
this motion, and to have only passed the space {p n.) Both
of them being transferred to (K k,) Jupiter will tijen appear
in the zodiac at (o) as being again direct, going forward ac-
icording to the order of the signs, and while the eaith did
pass the arch (I K) Jupiter then remained between the
points (n o,) and so consequently did again seem to be sta-
tionary. Both of them coming to (L /,) ^nd thence to
(M m,) Jupiter will still appear direct, and to have gone
forward in the zodiac from {q) to (/.) So that all the space
wherein Jupiter is retrograde, is represented by the arch
(n z.) In which space he himself moves in his own orb,
the arch {e /,) and so the earth in its orb, a proportional
space (EI).
As it hath been said of this planet, so likewise is it ap-
pliable to the other, Saturn, Mars, Venus, Mercury; all
which are thus made to appear direct, stationary, and i*fc-
trograde, by the motion of our earthy without the help of
those epicycles and excentrics, and such unnecessary
wheel-work, wherewith Ptolemy hath filled the heavens,
jLpsomuch, that here Fromondus * is fain to confess, nuUo
^ Antari3t. c. 18. Veat. tract, 4. c. 3. . , ,.
252
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
argumenio in speciem probabilioriy motum terne annum a
Copernicanis astruh quam illo stationis^ directionis^ regres"
sionts plafietarum. There is not any more probable argu-
ment to prove the annual motion of the earth» than its
agreeablenessto the station, direction, and regression of the
planets.
Lastly, that Copemicus's system of the heavens is very
answerable to the exactest observations, may be manifest
from this following description of it.
Suppose the sun to be situated at A : now because Mer-
cury is found by experience to be always very near the sun,
sb that be does for the most part lie hid under his rays; as
also because this planet hath a more lively vigorous light
than any of the other ; therefore we may infer, that his
orb is placed next unto the sun, as that at B.
As for Venus, it is observed, that she does always keep
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. f5$
At a set distance from the sun, never going from him above
'40 degrees, or thereabouts ; that her body appears through
the perspective to be forty times bigger at one time than at
SLaoiher; that when she seems biggest and nearest unto us,
we then discern her as being perfectly round. Therefore
doth this plapet also move in a circle that encompasses the
sun. Which circle does not contain the eaith within it;
because then V^nus would sometimes be in opposition to
the sun ; whereas it is generally granted^ that she never yet
came so far as to be in a sextile.
Nor is this circle below the sun (as Ptolemy supposeth)
because then this planet, in both its conjunctions, would ap-
pear horned, which she does not *.
Nor is it above the sun, because then she would always
appear in the full, and never horned.
From whence it will follow, that this orb must necessa^
rily be betwixt the earth and the sun, as that at C.
As for Mars, it is observed, that he does appear sixty
times bigger when he is near us, than at his greatest dis-
tance; that he is sometimes in opposition to the sun.
From whence we may conclude that his orb does contain
our earth within it. It is observed also, that he does con-
stantly appear in the full, and never horned: from whence
likewise it is manifest, that the sun is comprehended within
its orb, as it is in that which is represented by the circle E.
And because the like appearances are observed in Jupiter
and Saturn (though in less degrees) therefore we may with
good reason conceive them to be in the heavens, after some
such manner as they are here set down in the figure, by the
circles F G.
As for the moon, because she is sometimes in opposition
to the sun, therefore must her orb comprehend in it the
earth; because she appears dark in her conjunction, and
sometimes eclipses the sun ; therefore that must necessarily
be without her orb, as it is in that epicycle at H. In the
centre of which,- the earth must necessarily be situated,
* Matucina Vespertina.
254 THAT THE EAkTH mAy BE A PLANET.
according to all those appearances mentioned before. So
that the orb of its annual motion ^11 be represented by ftc
circle D. ^
All which appearances cannot so well be recoociled by
ftolemy, Tycho, Origanus, or by any other hypothesis^ as
by this of Copernicus. But the application of these to the
several planets, together with sundry other particulars,
concerning the theorical part of astronomy, you may see
more fully set down by those who have purposely handled
this subject, Copernicus, Rhetichus, Galilseus; but more
especially Keplar: unto whom I do acknowledge myself
indebted for sundry particulars in this discourse.
I have done with that which was the chief purpose of the
present treatise; namely, the removal of those common
prejudices that men usually entertain against this opinion.
It remains, that by way of conclusion, I endeavour to stir
tip others unto these kind of studies, which by most men
are so much neglected.
It is the most rational way, in the prosecution of several
objects, to proportion our love and endeavour after every
thing, according to the excellency and desirableness of it.
But now amongst all earthly contentments, there is nothing .
cither better in itself, or more convenient for us, than this
kind of learning; and that, whether you consider it accord-
ing to its general nature, as a science ; or according to its
more special nature, as such a science.
1 . Consider it as a science. Certain it is, that amongst
the variety of objects, those are more eligible which con-
duce unto the welfare of that which is our best part, our
souls. It is not so much the pleasing of our senses, or the
increasing of our fortunes, that does deserve our industry, as
the information of our judgments, the improvement of our
knowledge. Whatever the world may think, yet it is not a
vast estate, a noble birth, an eminent place, that can add
any thing to our true real worth ; but it must be the de-
grees of that which makes us men, that must make us bett^
men, the endowments of our soul, the enlargement of our
reason. Were it not for the contemplation of philosophy.
THAT THE EARTlt »|AY fiE A PLANET* 2B5
the heathen Seneca* would not so much as thank the
gods for his being: nisi ad hiec adinitterer non fuit opert
pretiuin nasci. Detrahe hoc inestimabile bonum non est
vita tanti, ut sudeniy ut testuem. Take but away this be-
nefit, and he would not think life worth the sweating for.
So much happiness could he discern in the studies of na-
ture. And therefore as a science in general, it may very
well deserve our love and industry.
2. Consider it as such a particular science, astronomy :
the word signifies the law of the stars ; and. the Hebrews
(who do not ordinarily admit of composition) call it in two
words, DOU; n\[:T\y ccelorum statutay or the ordinances of
heaven t ; because they are governed in their courses by a
certain rule, as the Psalmist speaks in the cxlviiith Psal. ver.
6. God has given them a law which shall not be broken.
Now this of all other natural sciences may best of all
challenge our industry; ^and that, whether you consider it,
1 . Absolutely, as it is in itself: or,
2. As it stands in reference to us.
1 . As it is in itself. The excellency of any science may
be judged of (saith the philosopher) first, by the excellency
of the object. Secondly, by the certainty of its demonstra-
tions.
1. For the object. It is no less than the whole world
(since our earth also is one of the planets) more especially
those vast and glorious bodies of the heavens. So tliat in
this respect it far exceeds all those barren, empty specula-
tions about materia prima^ and universale, and such like
cobwebs of learning ; in the study of which so many do
misplace their younger years. And for the same reason
likewise is it to be preferred before all those other sciences,
whose subjects are not either of so wide an extent, or so
excellent a nature.
2. For the demonstrations of astronomy, they are as in-
fallible as truth itself; and for this reason also does it excel
all other knowledge, which does more depend upon con-
* Prajf, ad L I.Nat. Qu^st. f Job xxxviii. 33. Jer. xxxiii. 25.
2B6 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
jectures and uncertainty. They are only those who want
skill in the principles of this science, tliat mistrust the con-
clusions of it. Since therefore in these respects, it is one
of the most excellent sciences in nature, it may best deserve
the industry of man, who is one of tlie best works o/ nature.
Other creatures were made with then* heads and eyes turned
downwards : would you know why man was not created so
too i why it was, that he might be an astronomer.
Os homini sublime deditf celumque iueri
Jussit, et erecios ad sydcra toUere vuitus*
God gave to man an upright face, that he
Might view the stars, and learn astronomy,
2. Consider it in reference to us; and so it is,
1. Most useful.
2. Most pleasant.
1. Most useful, and that in sundry respects. It proves a
God and a providence, and incites our hearts to a greater
admiration and fear of his omnipotency. We may under*
stand by the heavens, how much mightier he is that made
them ; for by the greatness and beauty of the creatures,
proportionably the maker of them is seen, saith the book of
Wisdom, xiii. 4, 5. It was hence that Aristotle did fetch his
chief argument to prove a primus motor. It was the con-
sideration of these things that first led men to the know-
ledge and worship of God (saith TuUy *) hac nos primum
ad deorum cultumy turn ad modestiamy magiiitudinemqiu
animi erudivit. And therefore when God by the prophet
would convince the people of his deity, he bids them lift up
their eyes on high, and behold who hatli created those
things ; that bringeth out their host by number, that calleth
them all by their names, &c. Isa. xl. 26. which occasi*
oned that saying of Lactantiusf ; Tanta rerum rnagnitudo^
ianta disposition tanta in servandis ordinibus^ tempuyribusque
constant ia; non potuit aut olim sine pravido artijice oririf
* Tiucul. 1. item Piut. de Placit. Phil. 1. 1. c. 6..
I Ixistit. 1. 2. c« 5. '
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. 257
aui c&nstare tot saculis sine incola potentCy aut perpetttum
gubernari sine perito et sciente rectore, quod ratio ipsa de*
clarat. Such a great order and constancy amongst tliose
vast bodies, could not at first be made but by a wise pro-
videnccj nor since preserved without a powerful inhatant,
nor so perpetually governed without a skilful guide.
True indeed, ati ordinary view and common apprehen«
doa of these celestial bodies, must needs manifest the ex-
cellency and omnipotency of their maker; but yet a more
accurate and diligent enquiry into their natures^ will raise
our understandings unto a nearer knowledge, and a greater
' admiration of the deity: as it is in those inferior things,
where the meer outside of a man, the comeliness and ma-
jesty of his countenance, may be some argument from
whence to infer the excellency of his creator. But yet the
subtle anatomist, who searches more deeply intd this won-
derful structure, may see a clear evidence for this in the
consideration of the inward fabric, the muscles, nerves,
membranes, together with all those secret contrivances in
the frame of this little world. Thus also is it in the great
universe, where tlie common apprehension of things is not
at all considerable, in comparison to those other discoveries,
which may be found out by a more exact enquiry.
As this knowledge may conduce to the proving of a God,
and making men religious ; so likewise may it serve to con-
firm unto us the truth of the holy scriptures : since the sa-
cred story, in the order of its narrations, does so exactly
agree with the conversions of heaven, and logistical astro-
nomy.
It may also stir us up to behave ourselves answerably
unto the noble and divine nature of our souls. When I
consider the heaven, the works of thy fingers, the moon
and the stars which thou hast ordained, what is man, that
thou art so mindful of him * ? as to create such vast glorious
bodies for his serviced
Again, when I consider with myself the strange immen-
* Psal; viii. 3. 6.
VOL. I. 9
35S THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
sity and bigness of this great universe, in comparison to
which, this earth of ours is but as an undiscemible point :
when I consider that I carry a soul about me, of far greater
worth than all this, and desires that are of a wider extent,
and more unbounded capacity than this whole frame of na-
ture ; then, methinks, it must needs argue a degeneratencss
and poverty of spirit, to busy my faculties about so ignoble,
narrow a subject as any of these earthly tilings. What a
folly is it in men to have such high conceits of themselves,
for some small possessions which they have in the world
above others ; to keep so great a bustle about so poor a
matter? Hoc est punctum quod inter tot gentts ferro et
igni dividitur*. It is but a little point which with so much
ado is distributed unto so many natjlons by fire and sword.
What great matter is it to be monarch of a small part of a
point? Might not the ants as well divide a little mole-bill
into divers provinces, and keep as great a stir in disposing of
their government? punctum est illudin que navigatis^ in
quo bellatisy in qua regna desponitis. All this place wherein
we war, and travel, and dispose of kingdoms, is but a point
far less than any of those small stars, that at this distance
are scarce discernible. Which when the soul does seriously
meditate upon, it will begin to despise the narrowness of
its present habitation, and think of providing for itself a
mansion in those wider spaces above ; such as may be
more agreeable to the nobleness and divinity of its nature.
Why should any one dream of propagating his name, or
spreading his report through the world ? When although
he had more glory than ambition can hope for, yet as long
as all this habitable earth is but an inconsiderable point,
what great matter can there be in that fame which is in-
cluded within such strait contracted limits ?
Quicunque solam mente preecipiti petit
Summumque credit gloriam,
* Sen. Nat. Quaest. 1. 1. Nonne d terrena animalia consideratis^ qui-
bus prxsidere videamini ? Nam si inter mares videres unum aliquam,
jus sibi ac potestatem pr« casteris vihdicentem, quanlo movereris ca-
cbionOf &c. Boetius de Consol. L 2.
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET. S^
Late patenies tetheris cemat plagas,
Arctumque terrarum si turn,
JBrev§m replere non valentis ambitum,
Ptidebit aucti nominis *.
** He that to honour only seeks to mount,
'' And that his chiefest end doth count ;
** Let him behold the largeness of the skies,
'< And on the strait earth cast his eyes;
*' He will despise the glory of his name,
'* Which cannot fill so small a frame."
Why should any one be taken up in the admiration of
these lower outsidcs, these earthly glories ? Respicite c(eli
spatium, Jirmiiudinem, celeritateniy et aliqtiando definite
vilia mirarif. He that rightly understands the nature of
the heavens, will scarce esteem any other thing worth his
notice, much less his wonder.
Now when we lay all this together, that he who hath
most in the world, hath almost nothing of it : that the earth
itself, in comparison to the universe is but an inconsiderable
point ; and yet that this whole universe does not bear so
great a proportion to the soul of man, as the earth does
unto that. I say, when a man in some retired thoughts
shall lay all this together, it must needs stir up his spirits
to a contempt of these earthly things, and make him place '
his love and endeavour upon those comforts that may be
more answerable to the excellency of his nature.
Without this science, what traffic could we have with fo-
reign nations? What would become of that mutual com-*
merce, whereby the world is now made but as one coni-
monwealth.
Vosque medits in aquis steiUe, pelagoque timendo»
Decretum monstrastis iter^ toiiqve dedistis,
Legibus inventis homtnum, commercia mundo,
'Us you bright stars, that m the fearful sea.
Do guide the pilot through His purposed way.
*Iis yoiur direction that doth commerce give.
With all those men that through the world do Ijve.
* BoetiuB de Consol. 1. 2. f Idem, lib. 3.
m
260 THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET.
2. As this science is thus profitable in these and n^ny
other respects ; so likewise is it ec^ually pleasant. The eye
(saith the philosopher) is the sense of pleasurci and there
are no delights so pure and immaterial as those which enter
through that organ. Now to tlie understanding, which is
the eye of , the soul, there cannot be any fairer prospect,
than to view the whole frame of nature, the fabric of this
great universe, to discern that order and comeliness which
there is in the magnitude, situation, motion of the several
parts that belong unto it ; to see the true cau?e of that con-
stant variety and alteration which there is in the different
seasons of the year*. All which must needs enter into a
man's thoughts with a great deal of sweetness and compla-
cency. And therefore it was that Julius Caesar in the
broils and tumult of the camp, make choice of this delight :
Media inter pnelia semper,
Stellar um, calique plagis, superisquc vacavit, \
He always, leisure found amidst his wart,
''I o mark the coast of heaven, and learn the stars.
And for this reason likewise did Seneca, amidst the con-
tinual noise and bustle of tb^ court^ betake liimself to this
recreation.
■0 quamjitvabaty quo nihil majust parens
Natura genuit, operis immensi artifex^
Ctpliim intueri solis, et currus sacros
Mundique motus, solis alternas vices,
Orbeniqne Pkeebes, astra quern citigunt vaga
Latequefulgeus (tiheris magui deciis.
O what a pleasure was it to survey
Nature's chief work^ the heavens ; where we may
View the alternate courses of the sun,
The sgcred chariots^ how the world doth run :
llie moon's bright orb, when- she's attended by
Those scattered stars, whose light adorns the sky.
And certainly those eminent men who have this way
Ibestowed a great part of their employment, such as werq
* Wis. vii. 18, 19. t Lucan, 1. 10,
THAT THE EARTH MAY BE A PLANET- 261
Ftolomyy Julius Caesar, Alphonsus king of Spain, the noble
Tycho, &c. have not only by this means pitched upon that
which for the present was a more solid kind of pleasure an^
contentment; Jsut also a surer way to propagate their me-
mories unto future ages Tliose great costly pyramids
which were built to perpetuate the memory of their foun-
ders, shall sooner perish and moulder away into their pri-
mitive dust, than the names of such wortliies shall be for-
gotten. The monuments of learning are more durable
than the monuments of wealth or power.
All which encouragements may be abundantly enough
to stir any considering man, to bestow some part of his
time in the study and inquisition of these truths.
Fcelices aninne, qnibus h<ec cognoscere primtmip
Tnque doijws superas scaiidcre curaj'uit.
EKD OF VOL. !•
C Wliittiogham, Printer,
Deaa*street, Fetter-Lane^ Loiiioo,
w
-I