GIFT OF
157
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
FARMERS' BULLETIN No. 34.
.9 iar/
l /
MEATS: COMPOSITION AND COOKING.
BY
CHAS. D. WOODS,
OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS.
[Corrected February 17, 1904.]
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1904.
-(4
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS,
Washington, D. C., October 12, 1895.
SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a Farmers' Bulletin,
an article on the composition and cooking of meats, prepared under the immediate
direction of Prof. W. 0. Atwater, special agent in charge of nutrition investigations,
by Mr. Chas. D. Woods, vice-director of the Storrs (Conn.) Experiment Station, and
attached to this Office as an expert for nutrition investigations. This bulletin sum-
marizes the results of investigations regarding the nutritive value of different kinds
of meat, and points out some of the things which should be considered in the cooking
of meats for different purposes. The table appended to this article is based upon all
the available data regarding the composition and fuel value of American meats (exclu-
sive of fish), and is believed to be more complete than any similar table hitherto
published.
Respectfully,
A. C. TRUE,
Director.
Hon. J. STERLING MORTON,
Secretary.
CONTENTS.
Page.
Animal and vegetable foods compared
Structure of meats 4
Composition of meats 4
Refuse, as bone, skin, etc 5
Water 7
Fats 7
Nitrogenous constituents (protein) 10
Carbohydrates and ash
Texture (toughness) of meats 11
Flavor of meats 13
Digestibility of meats 13
The cooking of meats 14
Boiling 15
Stewing
Broths, soups, meat extracts 17
Roasting 18
Cute of meat 19
Cuts of beef 19
Cuts of veal 21
Cuts of lamb and mutton : 22
Cuts of pork 23
Composition and fuel value of meats 24
ILLUSTRATIONS.
FIG. x. Diagrams of cute of beef 20
2. Diagrams of cuts of veal 21
3. Diagrams of cuts of lamb and mutton 22
4. Diagrams of cuts of pork ,.,--. 23
34
MEATS: COMPOSITION AND COOKING.
ANIMAL AND VEGETABLE FOODS COMPARED.
The food of man can not be healthful and adequate unless it supplies
the proper amount of the different nutritive ingredients, or "nutrients."
Practical experience proves this, and experimental inquiry demonstrates
it as well. Just what the functions of the different foods are their
"nutritive value and cost" has been discussed in Bulletin No. 142 of
this series, and a knowledge of the facts there set forth is necessary to
a clear understanding of the present bulletin.
/ It is natural to divide foods into two classes animal food and vege-
table food. Not only is this division simple and convenient, as pointing
out the two great sources of man's food, but the classification is a true
one, for the difference between animal and vegetable food is very strik-
ing in appearance, composition, and value in the economy of life.
It is true that many of the chemical compounds which enter into the
composition of these two classes of food are either alike or quite simi-
lar; but in general the vegetable foods contain large amounts of carbo-
h}^drates such as sugar, starch, woody fiber, etc. while the animal
foods, and meat in particular, contain only small amounts of these
carbohydrates. As regards the fats and nitrogenous matters or "pro-
tein," the case is reversed; for vegetable foods have comparatively
little of these two classes of nutrients, while meats have relatively
very large amounts.
The value of meats as food, therefore, depends on the presence of two
classes of nutrients, protein and fat. The protein is essential for the
construction and maintenance of the body. Both protein and fat yield
muscular power and maintain the temperature. It is possible to com-
bine the fat of animal foods with the protein so as to meet the require-
ments of the body without waste, but the vegetable foods contain
nutrients more especially adapted for the production of energy.
284456 s
Another difference between animal and vegetable foods is in their
digestibility. The compounds contained in the animal foods are, of
course, very much like those of our bodies, and therefore need but little
change before they are ready for use. The vegetable compounds, on
the other hand, require much greater changes before they can be assimi-
lated. They are less readily and less completely digested than the
animal foods. This is due in part to the fact that the nutrients of
vegetable foods are often inclosed in cells with woody walls, which
resist the action of the digestive fluids, and in part to the action of the
woody fiber in irritating the lining of the intestine, and thus hastening
the food through the intestine before the digestive juices have time to
act thoroughly upon the food. Indeed, the presence of the woody fiber
frequently prevents the complete digestion and absorption not only of
the nutrients contained in the vegetable foods, but also of those con-
tained in the animal foods eaten at the same time.
STRUCTURE OF MEATS.
In the sense in which the word is here used, meat consists of the
muscular tissue, or lean, and the varying quantities of fat which are
found in the different parts, as between and within membranes and ten-
dons. Besides the fat ordinarily visible there is always present more
or less of fat in particles too small to be readily distinguished from the
lean which surrounds it. These particles can, however, be readily
obtained by chemical methods in quantities sufficient to be seen and
weighed.
The lean part of meat has practically the same final structure regard-
less of its kind and its muscular tissue. All muscular tissue is made
up of prism shaped bundles, which can be divided into smaller and
smaller bundles, until finally the muscle fibers or tubes are reached.
These irregular tubes are so small that they are 'invisible to the unaided
eye. They vary in diameter from ^ to ^^ of an inch.
These muscle fibers or tubes are held together in bundles by means
of connective tissue, and the invisible fat is stored between and inside
the different fibers and bundles of fibers. Each of the bundles of
muscle fibers, seen when a piece of meat is cut "across the grain," as
in a round steak, is made up of hundreds of the muscle tubes.
The envelope or wall of each tube is a very delicate, elastic mem-
brane, composed of nitrogenous material. The walls themselves are
quite permanent, but their contents are continual!} 7 undergoing change
and renewal.
COMPOSITION OF MEATS.
As regards composition, the meats found in the markets consist of
the lean or muscular tissue, connective tissue or gristle, fatty tissue,
34
5
blood vessels, nerves, bone, etc. No general statement can be made
with regard to the proportion in which these substances occur, as it is
found to vary greatly with the kind of animal, with different "cuts"
from the same animal, and with many other conditions.
REFUSE, AS BONE, SKIN", ETC.
Nearly all meats bought and sold in the markets contain some por-
tions not suitable for eating, which may properly be designated as
refuse. Some of these, as bone, contain some nutriment, and may be
utilized to a greater or less extent in making soups, and perhaps in
some other ways; but for the most part they are thrown away.
It is important to distinguish between refuse and "waste." As the
term is ordinarily used, any portion considered unsuitable for eating
would be designated as refuse. At another time or under other con-
ditions, it might be desirable to use for food the portion which was
before considered useless. Such portions, therefore, are not refuse in
the proper meaning of the term. They are waste. Some parts of
meat, however, from their lack of nutrients or from the impossibility
of preparing them for food, are and always will be useless, and these
portions we may properly call refuse. As population increases there
is, however, an increasing tendency to utilize portions of meats which
have hitherto been thrown away. If our classification is to be a true
one, therefore, we must narrow the use of the term "refuse" from its
generally too-broad application and must cover much of its popular
meaning by the term "waste." The skin of fish and poultry, "rind"
of pork, case of sausages, etc., are illustrations of materials which
might by one person be classed as refuse and by another be consid-
ered edible and thus be classed as waste if they were rejected at the
table.
In ordinary meats the chief refuse is bone. The percentage of bone
varies so greatly that no precise statement can be made. In many
species of fish, bone constitutes more than one-half the dressed weight.
In some cuts of meat, on the other hand, notably the round of beef,
slice of ham, and similar cuts in other animals, there may not be more
than 2 or 3 per cent of bone, and in still other cuts, as shoulder clod,
there will be no bone at all.
In general, the younger the animal the larger the relative proportion
of bone, and with increase in fatness there is a relative decrease in the
amount of bone.
The following diagram shows graphically the variations in the refuse,
chiefly bone, in different kinds and cuts of meats.
The smallest and largest percentages of refuse found in different kinds and cuts of ineats,
Kind of meat.
Percent.
Comparative scale.
Beef:
Side
j from 12
|
Sirloin
Ito 21
ffrom 4
:
Round
tto 26
ffrom 4
'
BB
tto 11
Shoulder and clod..
ffrom 5
tto 28
mmm
Veal:
Side
(from 19
I^MUHOMM
Chops
Ito 25
ffrom 14
MBnoamHBMMM
Cutlet
Ito 20
rfrom 13
Mutton:
Side
ffrom 13
_
\to 23
Chops
ffrom 11
tto 20
Lee
ffrom 12
tto 24
.*
Pork:
Chops
ffrom 12
1
Ito 24
piYinVed hftTn
ffrom 8
mttmt
Halibut steak
tto 14
ffrom 11
=r
Cod
tto 23
ffrom 26
mmmm,
^i
\to 34
Mnr>Vral
ffrom 34
(to 58
Ito 59
tto 88
ffrom 40
tto 45
ffrom 44
\to 61
(6)
WATER.
Meats contain large and varying amounts of water. For the pur-
poses of mastication, swallowing, etc., of course this is better than if
the meat were dry; but the water contained in flesh has no greater
value as food than other water. From this it follows that the greater
the amount of water in a given weight of food the less is its relative
nutritive value, for it will contain a less quantity of nutritive material.
Fish and oysters have relatively more water than most other meats.
In general, the greater the amount of fat in a given cut the less is the
amount of water. For instance, a lean cut of beef may have 75 per
cent of water, while a fat cut from the same animal may not contain
more than 50 per cent.
The diagram on page 8 illustrates the variations in the quantity of
water in the edible portions of different kinds and cuts of meats.
FATS.
All meats contain some fat, partly stored in quantities so large as to
be readily seen, and partly distributed in such small particles that it is
only by chemical means that it can be obtained in quantities sufficient
to be appreciated. In the flesh of some animals, as cod and other
white-meated fish, and in chicken (} T oung fowl), rabbit, and veal, there
is little or no visible fat. In a very fat ox, on the other hand, one-
fourth of the weight of meat may be visible fat, and, in the case of fat
hogs, more than half the weight may be fat. No flesh is so lean as not
to contain at least minute portions of fat. Very lean flesh, as dried
beef, may not have more than 3 per cent of fat, while fat pork may
contain more than 90 per cent.
Fat is a valuable constituent of food. It is used in the body to form
fatty tissue and is consumed as fuel, thus serving to maintain the
animal temperature and to yield energy in the form of muscular and
other power. It is the most concentrated form in which the fuel con-
stituents of food are found. Its fuel value is two and one-fourth times
that of protein or the carbohydrates. In other words, 1 pound of fat
yields as much heat when burned as 2i pounds of carbohydrates, such
as starch, sugar, etc. The fat of animal foods might be so supplied
that, together with animal protein, all the needs of the body could be
met. The fuel constituents of vegetable foods are, however, better
adapted to furnish a large part of the energy required by the body.
The diagram on page 9 illustrates the variations in the percentage
of fats in the edible portions of different kinds and cuts of meats.
84
The smallest and largest percentages of water found in the edible portion of different
kinds and cuts of meat.
Kind of meat.
Per cent.
Comparative scale.
Beef:
Side
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
\to
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
/from
tto
48
72
51
75
57
75
61
74
62
75
69
74
61
75
67
77
39
59
31
56
52
68
38
60
22
57
12
70
79
81
84
64
Sirloin
Round
Hind shank
Shoulderandclod
Veal:
Side
Chops
Cutlet
Mutton:
Side
Chops . .
Leg
Pork:
Chops
Smoked ham
Fat, salt .
__
Halibut steak
Cod
Mackerel
79
65
74
82
Shad
Oysters
Long clams
91
85
86
79
Lobster
(8)
The smallest and largest percentages of fat in the edible portion of different kinds and
cuts of meat.
Kind of meat.
Per cent.
Comparative scale.
Beef:
Side
("from 6
Sirloin
\to 36
/from 9
_
Round
/from 3
.
Hind shank
/from 4
(to 19
m
Shoulder clod
Veal:
Side
/from 1
tto 22
/from 6
3
Chops
\to 10
/from 5
Cutlet
\to 19
/from 1
i
Mutton:
Side
\to 12
x
/from 23
Chops
ffrom 26
Itn SQ
Leg
/from 12
Ito 30
,___
Pork:
Chops
ffrom 19
Smoked ham
/from 17
Ito 57
Fat, salt
/from 83
Halibut steak
/from 2
Cod
\to 10
/from . 3
Mackerel
(to .5
/from 2
i
Shad
\to 16
/from 7
^MHMH
Oysters
\to 14
/from .6
Long clams
\to 2
/from 1
I
Lobster
\to 1
/from 3
v
tto 2
(9)
30398 No. 3408 2
10
NITROGENOUS CONSTITUENTS (PROTEIN).
There are a great many kinds of nitrogenous compounds in flesh,
and an almost hopeless confusion exists in their classification and in
the names assigned to the various classes by different chemists.
Chemists are quite generally agreed, however, in designating the total
nitrogenous substance as protein. These compounds containing nitro-
gen may be arranged in the following three groups or classes:
PROTEIN:
Albuminoids, as albumen (white of eggs); casein (curd) of milk; myosin, the
basis of muscle (lean meat) ; gluten of wheat, etc.
Gelatinoids, as collogen of tendons and ossein of bones, which yield gelatin or
glue, etc.
Nitrogenous extractives. Meats and fish contain very small quantities of so-called
extractives. They include creatin and allied compounds, sometimes called
meat bases, and are the chief ingredients of beef tea and meat extract.
The nitrogenous compounds of meats are made up chiefly of albumi-
noids and gelatinoids. The albuminoids are so called because they
resemble albumen or white of egg in their properties, and the gelati-
noid substances are so named because of their similarity to gelatin.
They are easily changed into gelatin by the action of hot water or
steam, as in the manufacture of gelatin and glue from bones.
The value of meats as food is chiefly due to the nitrogenous com-
pounds which they contain, and of these the most valuable are the
albuminoids. This is due to the fact that they are very similar in com-
position to the nitrogenous compounds of the body, and are therefore
easily digested and assimilated. Experiments with sheep, swine, dogs,
and other animals seem to show that feeding rich, nitrogenous foods
considerably increases the percentage of albuminoids in the flesh.
Very different views have been held at different times as to the
value of gelatin as a food. At one time it was considered nearly as
valuable as the albuminoids themselves; but later, from the investiga-
tions of the "French Gelatin Commission," it fell into disrepute and
was held to have almost no food value. Later and better conducted
experiments, however, have demonstrated that gelatin, when combined
with albuminoids and extractives, has a very considerable nutritive
value and serves to economize the albuminoids.
The last class, known as nitrogenous extractives, or meat bases, are
so called because of the ease with which they may be dissolved out
(extracted) by water. They are formed by the decomposition (cleavage)
of albuminoids and probably gelatinoids. They consist largely of
creatin and creatinin, substances which somewhat resemble thein and
caffein, the active principles of tea and coffee. They are of little
value as food, but they give flavor to meats, and are therefore of great
importance. They will be referred to again when we come to consider
the flavor of meats, soups, and meat extracts.
The lean of meat has, in round numbers, about 20 per cent of pro-
tein, or, weight for weight, about five times as much as milk. The flesh
at
II
of fowls, especially wild fowl, has on the average more protein than
beef, and the flesh of fish has less.
While protein is the most important and valuable ingredient of food,
lean flesh is, nevertheless, a one-sided diet, and to make a well-balanced
ration for man the addition of foods containing carbon, such as fat,
starches, sugar, etc., is necessary.
The diagram on page 12 illustrates the variations in protein in the
edible portions of different kinds and cuts of meats.
CARBOHYDRATES AND ASH.
Although carbohydrates occur in considerable quantities in other
foods, flesh contains but a small amount only a fraction of 1 per
cent and that chiefly in the form of glycogen, or muscle sugar. In
some of the organs, notably the liver, there are considerable quantities
of glycogen.
Meats also contain more or less of mineral matters (ash) which have
value as food. The most important of these are the phosphates of
potash, lime, and magnesia. These are used chiefly in the formation
of bone.
TEXTURE (TOUGHNESS) OF MEATS.
Whether meats are tough or tender depends upon two things the
character of the walls of the muscle tubes and the character of the
connective tissues which bind the tubes and muscles together. In
young and well-nourished animals the tube walls are thin and delicate,
and the connective tissue is small in amount. As the animals grow
older, or are made to work (and this is particularly true in the case of
poorly nourished animals), the walls of the muscle tubes and the con-
nective tissues become thick and hard. This is the reason why the
flesh of young, well-fed animals is tender and easily masticated, while
the flesh of old, hard-worked, or poorly fed animals is often so tough
that prolonged boiling, or roasting, seems to have but little effect on it.
After slaughtering, meats undergo marked changes in texture. These
changes can be grouped under three classes or stages. In the first
stage, when the meat is just slaughtered, the flesh is soft, juicy, and quite
tender. In the next stage the flesh stiffens and the meat becomes
hard and tough. This condition is known as rigor mortis and continues
until the third stage, when the first changes of decomposition set in.
In hot climates the meat is commonly eaten in either the first or second
stage. In cold climates it is seldom eaten before the second stage, and
generally, in order to lessen the toughness, it is allowed to enter the
third stage, when it becomes soft and tender, and acquires added flavor.
The softening is due in part to the formation of lactic acid, which acts
upon the connective tissue. The same effect may be produced, though
more rapidly, by macerating the meat with weak vinegar. Meat is
sometimes made tender by cutting the flesh into thin slices and pound-
ing it across the cut ends until the fibers are broken.
34
The smallest and
largest percentages of protein in the edible portion of different kinds
and cuts of meats.
Kind of meat.
Perc
ent. Comparative scale.
Beef:
Side
("from
15 p
Sirloin
\to
ffrom
10 "
Round
\to
/from
Hind shank
(to
/from
"
Shoulder clod
Veal:
Side
[to
/from
\to
/from
s
Chops
(to
/from
"1
Cutlet
(to
ffrom
"1
Mutton:
Side
\to
ffrom
Chops
\to
/from
Leg
\to
[from
Pork:
Chops
(.10
/from
Smoked ham
/from
\to
Fat salt
ffrom
1 i
\to
Halibut steak
Cod . ..
\to
/from
19 p^" '
Mackerel
\to
ffrom
![ == "
Shad
\to
/from
19 1
Oysters.
\to
/from
4-
Long clams
[to
/from
9 BHBs^a
8 "
Lobster
\to
/from
9 mmmm,
ito
(12)
34
13
FLAVOR OF MEATS.
The toughness or tenderness of meat, as has been stated above, is
dependent upon the walls of the muscle tubes and the connective
tissue. The flavor, however, depends largely upon the kinds and
amounts of "nitrogenous extractives " which the tubes contain. Pork
and mutton are deficient in extractives, and what flavor they possess
is due largely to the fats contained in them. The flesh of birds and of
most game is very rich in extractives/ which accounts ior its high
flavor. In general the flavor of any particular meat is largely modified
by the condition of the animal when slaughtered, and by its food, age,
breed, etc. We have seen that the flesh of young animals is more
tender, but it is also true that it is not so highly flavored as that from
more mature animals. In most cases, also, the flesh of males is more
highly flavored than that of females. There are two exceptions to this
rule. The flesh of the goose is more highly flavored than that of the
gander, and in the case of pork there is little difference between the
flesh of the male and that of the female. Castration, as illustrated in
the familiar example of the capon, makes the flesh more tender, fatter,
and better flavored.
With the exception of fish, the flesh of animals which feed exclu-
sively upon fish or flesh has a strong, disagreeable taste, and is eaten
only by uncivilized people or those in great need. As regards ordinary
mat, however, it is enough to say that the nitrogenous extractives, and
hence the flavor, depend mainly upon the age of the animal and the
character of its food.
Meat which is allowed to hang and ripen develops added flavors. In
the first stages of decomposition compounds quite similar to the nitrog-
enous extractives are formed, and it is to these that the added flavors
are due. Game is sometimes allowed to hang until the decomposition
changes have gone so far as to be offensive to one whose taste is not
educated to enjoy the flavor of u high" meat.
DIGESTIBILITY OF MEATS.
We must remember that, as in the case of other foods, the value of
meats does not depend entirely upon the amount of nutrients which
they contain, but to some extent upon the amount of these nutrients
which the body can digest and use for its support. Digestion proper
consists of the changes which the food undergoes in the digestive tract,
where the digestible portion is prepared to be taken up by the blood
and lymph. These changes are chemical processes, and we can deter-
mine quite readily by experiment how much of each nutrient will be
digested, but this line of research is new and the methods are not yet
perfect^ matured.
Comparatively little attention has been given to the percentages of
the different meats which are digested; but the facts so far obtained
84
14
seem to indicate that flesh of all kinds, either raw or cooked, is quite
completely digested by a healthy man. Rubner found that when given
in quantities of not more than 2 pounds per day all but 3 per cent of
the dry matter of roasted beef was digested by a healthy man. From
other experiments roasted flesh seems to be rather more completely
digested than either raw or boiled meat, but raw meat is more easily
digested than cooked (boiled or roasted).
A far larger number of experiments and observations have been
made upon the digestive processes which pertain to the stomach than
upon complete digestion. This is partly due to the hygienic importance
of stomach digestion (for a large part of the digestive disorders occur
in the stomach) and partly to the ease with which observations of
stomach digestion can be made. Much is said about " ease of diges-
tion," by which is usually meant the rapidity with which certain foods
pass out of the stomach into the intestine, where the principal work
of digestion actually takes place. Roast chicken and veal are tender,
easily masticated, well flavored and appetizing, and, so far as the stomach
or gastric digestion is concerned, are easily and rapidly digested. This
agrees with the practice of using the so-called " white meats" in diets
for the sick room. The rapidity of gastric digestion of this class of
foods is due to the tenderness of the muscular tissues, and to the fact
that this kind of meat contains almost no fat. Fat meats, as beef and
mutton, are much less quickly passed out of the stomach, and gastric
digestion in the case of fat pork is especially difficult. Although
gastric digestion is important, it is by no means a measure of the
digestibility of a food.
The question of the digestibility of food in the broad sense is a very
complex one, and there is much room for investigation in this field of
research in learning the quantities of nutrients which are digested
from different kinds of meats, in studying the effects of cooking, in
determining the influence of different substances and conditions upon
digestion, and in the study of numerous other questions. Until these
investigations and experiments shall have been made, it will not be
possible to affirm much more about the digestibility of meats than the
simple but important statement that nearly all the protein and about
95 per cent of the fats are digested by the average person.
THE COOKING OF MEATS.
Uncivilized man differs from civilized man in no more striking way
than in the preparation of food. The former takes his nourishment as
it is offered by nature; the latter prepares his food before eating, and
in ways which are the more perfect the higher his culture.
Meat is rarely eaten raw by civilized people. For the most part it is
either roasted, stewed, fried, or boiled. Among the chief objects of
cooking are the loosening and softening of the tissues, which facilitates
84
15
digestion by exposing them more fully to the action of the digestive
juices. Another important object is to kill parasites, and thus render
harmless organisms that might otherwise expose the eater to great
risks. Minor, but by no means unimportant, objects are the coagula-
tion of the albumen and blood so as to render the meat more accepta-
ble to the sight, and the development and improvement of the natural
flavor, which is often accomplished in part by the addition of condi-
ments.
Flavoring materials and an agreeable appearance do not directly
increase the thoroughness of digestion, but serve to stimulate the
digestive organs to greater activity. As regards the actual amount
digested, this stimulation is probably not of so great moment as is
commonly supposed. Meat that has been extracted with water so as
to be entirely tasteless has been found in actual experiment to be as
quickly and completely digested as an equal weight of meat roasted in
the usual way.
In general, it is probably true that cooking diminishes the ease of
digestion of most meats. Cooking certainly can not add to the amount
of nutritive material in meat; and it may, as we shall see, remove con-
siderable quantities of the nutrients.
BOILING.
If it is desired to heat the meat enough to kill parasites or bacteria ia
the inner portions of the cut, the piece must be exposed to the action
of heat for a long time. Ordinary methods of cooking are seldom
sufficient. In a piece of meat weighing 10 pounds the temperature of
the interior, after boiling four hours, was only 190 F. The inner tem-
perature of meat when roasting has been observed to vary from 160
to 200 F. , according to the size of the piece. In experiments upon the
canning of meat it was found that when large and even small cans were
kept for some time in a salt-water bath at a temperature considerably
above the boiling point of water, the interior temperature of the meat
rose to 208 in some cases and only 165 in others. Large cans of meat
are more liable to have bad spots than smaller cans, because the heat
in them is not sufficient to destroy the bacteria or other organisms that
cause the meat to decompose.
If meat is placed in cold water, part of the organic salts, the soluble
albumen, and the extractives or flavoring matters will be dissolved out.
At the same time small portions of lactic acid are formed, which act
upon the meat and change some of the insoluble matters into materials
which may also be dissolved out. The extent of this action and the
quantity of materials which actually go into the solution depend upon
three things the amount of surface exposed to the water, the tem-
perature of the water, and the length of the time of the exposure.
The smaller the pieces the longer the time, or the hotter the water the
16
richer will be the broth and the poorer the meat. If the water is
heated gradually, more and more of the soluble materials are dissolved.
At a temperature of about 134 F. the soluble albumen will begin to
coagulate, and at 160 F. the dissolved albumen will rise as a brown-
ish scum to the top, and the liquid will become clear. Upon heating
still higher, the connective tissues begin to be changed into gelatin,
and are partly dissolved out, while the insoluble albuminoids are
coagulated. The longer the action of the hot water continues, the
tougher and more tasteless the meat becomes, but the better the broth.
Treated in this way flesh may lose over 40 per cent by weight. This
loss is principally water, but from 5 to 8 per cent may be made up of
the soluble albumen, gelatin, mineral matters, organic acids, muscle
sugar, and flavoring materials. Part of the melted fat also goes into
the broth.
It would be a great mistake to assume that the nearly tasteless mass
of fibers which is left undissolved by the water has no nutritive value.
This tasteless material has been found to be as easily and completely
digested as the same weight of ordinary roast. It contains nearly all
the protein of the meat, and, if it is properly combined with vegeta-
bles, salt, and flavoring materials, makes an agreeable as well as nutri-
tive food.
If a piece of meat is plunged into boiling water or very hot fat the
albumen on the entire surface of the meat is quickly coagulated, and
the enveloping crust thus formed resists the dissolving action of water
and prevents the escape of the juices and flavoring matters. Thus
cooked, the meat retains most of its flavoring matters and has the
desired meaty taste. The resulting broth is correspondingly poor.
The. foregoing statements will be of much help in the rational cook-
ing of meats in water. The treatment depends largely upon what it is
desired to do. It is impossible to make a rich broth and have a juicy,
highly flavored piece of boiled meat at the same time. If the meat
alone is to be used, the cooking in water should be as follows: Plunge
the cut at once into a generous supply of boiling water and keep the
water at the boiling point, or as near boiling as possible, for ten minutes,
in order to coagulate the albumen and seal the pores of the meat; the
coating thus formed will prevent the solvent action of the water and
the escape of the soluble albumen and juices from the inner portions
of the meat. But if the action of the boiling water should be contin-
ued, the whole interior of the meat would, in time, be brought near the
temperature of boiling water, and all the albumen would be coagulated
and rendered hard. Instead of keeping the water at the boiling point
(212 F.), therefore, the temperature should be allowed to fall to about
180 F., when the meat could be thoroughly cooked without becoming
hard. A longer time will be required for cooking meat in this way,
but the albumen will not be firmly coagulated, and the flesh will be
84
17
tender and juicy instead of tough and dry, as will be the case when
the water is kept boiling, or nearly boiling, during the entire time of
cooking.
In boiling sections of delicate fish, as salmon, cod, or halibut, the
plunging into boiling water is objectionable because the motion of the
boiling water tends to break the fish into small pieces. Fish should be
first put into water that is on the point of boiling. The water should
be kept at this temperature for a few minutes and then allowed to fall
to 180 F., as in the case of meats.
STEWING.
If both the broth and the meat are to be used, the process of cooking
should be quite different from that outlined for boiling meat. Stewing
is in this country a much undervalued method of cooking. This is
probably due partly to the fact that stewing is generally very improp-
erly done, and partly to the general aversion which Americans, con-
sciously or unconsciously, have to "made dishes" of any kind. This
aversion probably has its origin in a false notion which spurns economy
or any attempt at economy in diet.
In stewing, the meat should be cut into small pieces, so as to present
relatively as large a surface as possible, and, instead of being quickly
plunged into hot water, should be put into cold water in order that
much of the juices and flavoring materials may be dissolved. The
temperature should then be slowly raised until it reaches about 180
F., where it should be kept for some hours. Treated in this way, the
broth will be rich and the meat still tender and juicy.
If the watej* is made much hotter than 180 F. the meat will be dry
and fibrous. It is true that if a high temperature is maintained long
enough the connective tissues will be changed to gelatin and partly
dissolved away, and the meat will apparently be so tender that if
touched with a fork it will fall to pieces. It will be discovered, how-
ever, that no matter how easily the fibers come apart, they offer con-
siderable resistance to mastication. The albumen and fibrin have
become thoroughly coagulated, and while the fibers have separated
from each other the prolonged boiling has only made them drier and
firmer.
BROTHS, SOUPS, MEAT EXTRACTS.
The quantities of the ingredients in a meat broth may be illustrated
by a German experiment. One pound of beef and 7 ounces of veal bones
gave about a pint of strong broth or soup, which contained, by weight:
Water, 95.2 percent; protein, 1.2 per cent; fat, 1.5 per cent; extract-
ives, 1.8 per cent; and mineral matters, 0.3 per cent.
Very palatable broths can be made by using more water and adding
savory herbs. Broths thus made have, of course, a greater amount of
water, frequently as much as 98 percent, or even more, and the nutrients
18
are correspondingly reduced in amount. It would appear from the
analysis given above that the amount of solids in broths is generally
small. Consequently their strong taste and stimulating effect upon the
nervous system must be ascribed to the meat bases (flavoring matters)
and to the salts of potash which they contain. Besides meat bases,
soups contain more or less gelatin, varying directly with the quantity
of bones used in the preparation.
The term meat extract is commonly applied to a large number of
preparations of very different character. They may be conveniently
divided into three classes: (1) True meat extracts; (2) meat juice
obtained by pressure and preserved, compounds which contain dried
pulverized meat, and similar preparations; and (3) albumose or peptose
preparations, commonly called predigested foods.
The true meat extract, if pure, contains little else besides the flavor-
ing matters of the meat from which it is prepared, together with such
mineral salts as may be dissolved out. It should contain no gelatin
or fat, and can not, from the way in which it is made, contain any
albumen. It is, therefore, not a food at all, but a stimulant, and
should be classed with tea, coffee, and other allied substances. It
should never be administered to the sick except as directed by compe-
tent medical advice. Its strong, meaty taste is deceptive, and the
person depending upon it alone for food would certainly die of starvation.
Such meat extracts are often found useful in the kitchen for flavoring-
soups, sauces, etc. Broth and beef tea as prepared ordinarily in the
household contain more or less protein, gelatin, and fat, and therefore
are foods as well as stimulants. The proportion of water in such com-
pounds is always very large.
The preserved meat juice and similar preparations contain more or
less protein, and therefore have some value as food.
The third class of preparations is comparatively new. The better
ones are really what they claim to be predigested foods. They con-
tain the soluble albumoses (peptoses), etc., which are obtained from
meat by artificial digestion. Their use should be regulated by com-
petent medical advice.
BOASTING.
The principal difference between roasting and boiling is in the medium
in which the meat is cooked. In boiling, the flesh to be cooked is sur-
rounded by boiling water; in roasting, by hot air, although in roast-
ing proper much of the heat comes to the joint as " radiant" heat. In
both cases, if properly conducted, the fibers of the meats are cooked in
their own juices.
When the meat alone is to be eaten, either roasting, broiling, or fry-
ing in deep fat is, when properly done, a more rational method than
boiling, for the juices are very largely saved. The shrinkage in a roast
of meat during cooking is chiefly due to a loss of water. At the same
19
time small amounts of carbon and nitrogen are driven off and a, little
acid is produced which dissolves some of the constituents of the meat.
The fat undergoes a partial decomposition into fatty acids and glycerin,
and a little of it is volatilized.
It is interesting and at the same time important to remember that
the smaller the cut to be roasted the hotter should be the fire. An
intensely hot fire coagulates the exterior and prevents the drying up
of the meat juices. This method would not, however, be applicable
to large cuts, because meats are poor conductors of heat, and a large
piece of meat exposed to this intense heat would become burned and
changed to charcoal on the exterior long before the heat could pene-
trate to the interior. Hence the rule : The smaller the cut to be roasted,
the higher the temperature to which it should be exposed.
The broiling of a steak or a chop is done on exactly this principle. An
intense heat should be applied to thoroughly coagulate the albumen
and stop the pores, and thus prevent the escape of the juices. A steak
exposed to an intense heat for ten minutes is thoroughly cooked, and
has yet that rare, juicy appearance which is so desirable.
CUTS OF MEAT.
The methods of cutting sides of beef, veal, mutton, and pork into
parts, and the terms used for the different "cuts," as these parts are
commonly called, vary in different localities. The analyses here
reported apply to cuts as indicated by the following diagrams. These
show the positions of the different cuts, both in the live animal and
in the dressed carcass as found in the markets. The lines of division
between the different cuts will vary slightly, according to the usage of
the local market, even where the general method of cutting is as here
indicated. The names of the same cuts likewise vary in different parts
of the country.
CUTS OF BEEF.
The general method of cutting up a side of beef is illustrated in
fig. 1, which shows the relative position of the cuts in the animal and
in a dressed side. The neck piece is frequently cut so as to include
more of the chuck than is represented by the diagrams. The shoulder
clod is usually cut without bone, while the shoulder (not indicated
in diagram) would include more or less of the shoulder blade and
of the upper -end of the fore shank. Shoulder steak is cut from the
chuck. In many localities the plate is made to include all the parts
of the forequarter designated on the diagrams as brisket, cross-ribs,
plate and navel, and different portions of the plate, as thus cut, are
spoken of as the " brisket end of plate" and "navel end of plate."
This part of the animal is largely used for corning. The ribs are
20
frequently divided into first, second, and third cuts, the latter lying
nearest the chuck and being slightly less desirable than the former.
The chuck is sometimes subdivided in a similar manner the third cut
1. Neck.
2. Chuck.
3. Ribs.
4. Shoulder clod.
5. Fore shank.
6. Brisket.
7. Cross ribs.
8. Plate.
9. Navel.
10. Loin.
11. Flank.
12. Rump.
13. Round.
14. Second cut round.
15. Hind shank.
FIG. 1. Diagrams of cuts of beef.
of the chuck being nearest the neck. The names applied to different
portions of the loin vary considerably in different localities. The part
nearest the ribs is freqently called "small end of loin" or "short
34
steak." The other end of the loin is called " hip sirloin" or " sirloin."
Between the short and the sirloin is a portion quite generally called
the " tenderloin," for the reason that the real tenderloin, the very tender
strip of meat lying inside the loin, is found most fully developed in this
cut. Porterhouse steak is a term most frequently applied to either the
short steak or the tenderloin. It is not uncommon to find the flank
cut so as to include more of the loin than is indicated- in the figures, in
which case the upper portion is called " flank steak." The larger part
of the flank is, however, very frequently corned, as is also the case with
the rump. In some markets the rump is cut so as to include a portion
of the loin, which is then sold as u rump steak." The portion of the
round on the inside of the leg is regarded as more tender than that
on the outside, and is frequently preferred to the latter. As the leg
lies upon the butcher's table this inside of the round is usually on the
upper, or top side, and is therefore called "top round." Occasionally
the plate is called the " rattle."
CUTS OF VEAL.
The method of cutting up a side of veal differs considerably from
that employed with beef. This is illustrated by fig. 2, which shows
the relative position of the cuts in the animal and in a dressed side.
1. Neck, 6. Ribs. ,
2. Chuck. 7. Loin.
3. Shoulder. 8. Flank.
4. Fore shank. 9. Leg.
5. Breast. 10. Hind shank.
FIG. 2. Diagrams of cuts of veal.
The chuck is much smaller in proportion, and frequently no distinction
is made between the chuck and the neck. The chuck is often cut so
as to include a considerable of the portion here designated as shoulder,
following more nearly the method adopted for subdividing beef. The
22
shoulder of veal as here indicated includes, besides the portion corre-
sponding to the shoulder in beef, the larger part of what is here classed
as chuck in the adult animal. The under part of the forequarter,
corresponding to the plate in the beef, is often designated as breast in
the veal. The part of the veal corresponding to the rump of beef is
here included with the loin, but is often cut to form part of the leg.
In many localities the fore and hind shanks of veal are called the
"knuckles."
CUTS OF LAMB AND MUTTON.
Fig. 3 shows the relative position of the cuts in a dressed side of
mutton or lamb and in a live animal. The cuts in a side of lamb and
mutton number but six, three in each quarter. The chuck includes
the ribs as far as the end of the shoulder blades, beyond which comes
the loin. The flank is made to include all the under side of the animal.
Some butchers, however, make a larger number of cuts in the fore-
1. Neck.
2. Chuck.
3. Shoulder.
4. Flank.
5. Loin.
6. Leg.
FIG. 3. Diagrams of cuts of lamb and mutton.
quarter, including a portion of the cuts marked "loin" and "chuck"
in fig. 3, to make a cut designated as "rib," and a portion of the
"flank" and "shoulder" to make a cut designated as "brisket." The
term "chops" is ordinarily used to designate portions of either the
loin, ribs, chuck or shoulder, which are either cut or "chopped" by
the butcher into pieces suitable for frying or broiling. The chuck
and ribs are sometimes called the " rack."
CTJTS OF PORK.
The method of cutting up a side of pork differs considerably from
that employed with other meats. A large portion of the carcass of a
dressed pig consists of almost clear fat. This furnishes the cuts which
are used for "salt pork" and bacon. Fig. 4 illustrates a common
method of cutting up pork, showing the relative position of the cuts
in the animal and in the dressed side. The cut designated as "back
cut" is almost clear fat and is used for salting and pickling. The
"middle cut" is the portion quite generally used for bacon and for
"lean ends" salt pork. The belly is salted or pickled or may be made
into sausages.
Beneath the "back cut" are the ribs and loin, from which are
obtained "spareribs," "chops," and roasting pieces, here designated by
1. Head.
2. Shoulder.
3. Back.
4. Middle cut.
5. Belly.
6. Ham.
7. Ribs.
8. Loin.
FIG. 4. Diagrams of cuts of pork.
dotted lines. The hams and shoulders are more frequently cured, but
are also sold fresh as pork "steak." The tenderloin proper is a com-
paratively lean and very small strip of meat lying under the bones of
the loin and usually weighing a fraction of a pound. Some fat is
usually trimmed off from the hams and shoulders, which is called
"ham and shoulder fat," and is often used for sausages, etc. What
is called "leaf lard," at least in some localities, comes from the inside
of the back. It is the kidney fat.
As stated above, cuts as shown in the diagrams herewith correspond
to those of which analyses are reported in the table beyond, but do
not attempt to show the different methods of cutting followed in
markets in different parts of the United States.
84
24
COMPOSITION AND FUEL VALUE OF MEATS.
Within recent years analyses of a large number of samples of meat
have been made in this country. In the table below, the average results
of these analyses are given. Analyses of fish are not included,
because the subject of the composition and nutritive value of fish is
fully treated in another bulletin of this series. a
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat.
Food materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
BEEF. FKE8H.
Brisket:
Edible portion
Perct.
Perct.
64.6
Perct.
15.8
Per ct.
28.5
Perct.
Per ct.
0.9
Cols.
1.495
As purchased .
23.3
41.6
12.0
22.3
.6
1,165
Chuck, including shoulder:
65
19 2
15.4
.9
1.005
As purchased ................
17.3
54.0
15.8
12.6
.7
820
Chuck rib:
66 8
19
13 4
1.0
920
As purchased . ...
19.1
53.8
15.3
11.1
.8
755
Flank:
Edible portion
59.3
19.6
21.1
.9
1,255
5 5
56 1
18.6
19.9
.8
1,185
Loin:
Edible portion
61.3
19.0
19.1
1.0
1,155
As purchased
13.3
62.9
16.4
16.9
.9
1,020
Loin boneless strip as purchased b .
66.3
17.8
16.7
.8
1.035
62 5
19 7
17.7
.9
1 115
Loin,' porter house steak: &
60
21.9
20.4
1.0
1,270
As purchased .... .................
12.7
52.4
19.1
17.9
.8
1,110
Loin, sirloin steak :*>
Edible portion
61 9
18 9
18 6
1.0
1 130
As purchased . ............
12.8
54.0
16.5
16.1
.9
985
Loin, top of sirloin: &
Edible portion
42.2
13.8
43.7
0.8
2,100
3 2
40.9
13 3
42.3
.7
2,030
59 2
16 2
24 4
.8
1 330
Loin, trimmings :&
Edible portion
55
16 9
28.0
.8
1,496
As purchased ....
48.8
27.9
8.5
14.7
.4
780
Navel:
Edible portion
47.6
15.6
36.5
.8
1,830
11.4
42.2
13.8
32.3
.7
1,620
Neck:
Edible portion
66.3
20.7
12.7
1.0
920
31 2
45 3
14.2
9.2
.7
650
Plate:
Edible portion
56.3
16.8
26.9
.8
1,450
19 8
44 4
13 1
22.7
.6
1,200
Ribs:
57
17.8
24.6
.9
1,370
As purchased
20.1
45.3
14.4
20.0
.7
1,110
Rib rolls as purchased . . .
64.8
19.4
15.5
.9
1,015
Rib trimmings:
Edible portion . .......
54.7
16.9
28.4
.8
1,615
34 1
35.7
11.0
19.2
.5
1,015
Ribs, cross:
Edible portion
54.9
15.9
28.2
.8
1,485
12 5
48
13.8
24.8
.7
1,305
Round:
Edible portion
67.8
20.9
10.6
1.1
835
8 5
62.5
19.2
9.2
1.0
746
Round, second cut:
Edible portion
69.8
20.4
8.6
1.1
740
19 5
56 2
16.4
6.9
.9
595
Rump:
Edible portion
57.9
18.7
23.1
.9
1,325
19
46 9
15.2
18.6
.8
1,065
Shank, fore:
Edible portion .
70.3
21.4
8.1
.9
710
38.3
43.2
13.2
6.2
.6
465
. S. Dept. Agr., Farmers' Bui. 85. b All loin parts are included under analyses of " loin."
25
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Food materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
BEEP, FKESH continued.
Shank, hind:
Edible portion
Perct.
Perct.
69.6
31.0
68.9
67.0
57.1
36.7
68.6
63.3
60.4
49.1
62.6
49.5
66.3
55.3
59.8
60.4
62.2
52.0
62.2
60.5
80.6
62.6
53.2
76.7
63.1
71.2
65.6
70.9
13.7
70.8
51.8
23.2
48.2
44.1
63.0
54.8
68.3
51.8
75.4
72.3
51.8
44.8
71.9
52.9
66.1
71.4
67.9
47.7
58.9
49.9
51.3
74.6
Perct.
21.7
9.7
20.0
16.5
16.9
10.8
18.9
14.7
17.9
14.5
18.3
14.4
20.0
16.7
18.3
15.4
19.3
16.1
18.8
15.2
8.8
16.0
14.8
16.6
13.7
20.4
20.2
16.8
4.7
18.9
14.1
21.4
22.3
23.6
27.6
23.5
28.0
25.5
13.3
17.8
26.3
39.2
18.4
27.6
22.2
17.8
26.3
18.5
26.9
21.4
19.6
16.8
Perct.
8.7
- 8.9
10.3
8.4
25.2
16.2
12.2
9.5
21.4
17.6
18.9
15.1
13.4
11.2
21.6
18.3
18.3
15.4
18.8
15.5
9.3
20.4
24.7
4.8
1.9
4.5
3.1
12.1
81.8
9.2
6.7
61.7
28.6
27.7
7.7
20.4
11.0
22.5
4.6
6.8
18.7
5.4
5.1
15.9
8.4
10.0
6.8
4.6
14.8
25.1
23.2
8.5
Perct.
Perct.
1.0
.4
1.1
.9
1.0
.6
.8
.6
.9
.7
.9
.7
1.0
.8
.9
.7
.9
.8
.9
.7
1.1
1.0
.9
1.2
1.0
1.6
1.3
1.6
.3
1.0
.8
8.5
1.3
1.5
1.8
1.2
2.8
1.3
2.7
1.9
4.0
11.2
2.5
4.8
3.2
1.2
1.2
.8
1.3
4.0
4.0
.6
Cals.
77
346
805
660
1,380
885
865
675
1,236
1,010
1,135
905
935
785
1,250
1,060
1,130
950
1,145
935
655
1,160
1,320
520
335
605
555
825
3,540
740
545
2,680
1,620
1,610
840
1,300
985
1,425
615
640
1,280
960
600
1,185
765
755
756
535
1,105
1,465
1,340
670
55.4
Shoulder and clod:
Edible portion
As purchased
17.4
Socket:
Edible portion
As purchased
35.8
Forequarter, lean:
Edible portion
As purchased
22.3
Forequarter, medium fat:
Edible portion
As purchased
18.7
Forequarter:
Edible portion
As purcnased
20.6
Hind quarter, lean:
Edible portion
As purchased
16.6
Hind quarter, medium fat:
Edible portion
As purchased
15.7
Hind quarter:
Edible portion
As purchased
16.3
Sides: P
Edible portion
As purchased .
18.6
BEEP ORGANS.
Brain, edible portion . . .
Heart:
Edible portion
As purchased . . .....
5.9
Kidney:
Edible portion.
0.4
As purchased ... .
19.9
Beef liver:
Edible portion
1.7
2.5
As purchased .
7.3
Suet, as purchased
Tongue:
Edible portion
As purchased . . ............
26.5
BEEP, COOKED.
Roast as purchased
Pressed as purchased
Loin steak, te'nderloin , broiled, edible portion
BEEF, CANNED.
Chili-con-carne as purchased ....
4.0
1.1
Corned 'beef ....'.. *..
Dried beef as purchased
2.1
Luncheon beef as purchased
Ox cheek as purchased . .
Oxtails: '
Edible portion
29.7
34
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Food materials.
Refuse
Water.
Protein
(N x
6.26).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
BEEF, CORNED AND PICKLED.
Brisket:
Edible portion
Perct.
Per ct.
50.9
Per ct.
18.3
Per ct.
24.7
Perct.
Per ct.
6.7
Cols.
I 385
As purchased.
21 4
40
14 4
19 4
4 5
1 085
Flank:
Edible portion .... ....
49 9
14.6
33
2 9
1 665
As purchased
12 1
43 7
12 9
29 2
2 6
1*470
Plate:
Edible portion
40 1
13 7
41 9
4 7
2 025
As purchased
14.5
34.3
11.7
35.8
4.0
1 730
Rump:
Edible portion
58.1
15.3
23.3
o o
1 270
As purchased
6.0
54.6
14.3
22.0
3 1
1 195
Extra family beef:
Edible portion
37.0
12.3
47.2
4.0
2 220
As purchased ...
10 4
33.1
11 1
42.3
3 6
1 990
Mess beef, salted:
Edible portion
37.0
12 6
44.5
6 5
2 HO
As purchased
10 5
33
11 2
39 9
5 9
1 890
Corned beef:
Edible portion
53 6
15 6
26 2
4 9
1 395
As purchased
8.4
49.2
14.3
23.8
4.6
1 271
Spiced beef, rolled as purchased
30
12
51.4
6.8
2 390
Tongues, pickled:
Edible portion
62.3
12 8
20.5
4.7
1 105
As purchased
6
58 9
11 9
19 2
4 3
1 030
Tripe, as purchased
86.6
11.7
1.2
2
.3
*270
Dried, salted, and smoked:
Edible portion
54.3
30.0
6.5
.4
9.1
840
As purchased . .
4.7
53 7
26 4
6.9
8.9
780
VEAL, FRESH.
Breast, very lean:
Edible portion
73.2
23.1
2.5
1.2
536
46.8
88.9
12.3
1.3
.7
285
Breast:
Edible portion
68.2
20.3
11.0
1.0
840
As purcnased ........
24.5
51.3
15.3
8.6
.8
645
Chuck:
Edible portion
73.8
19.7
5.8
1.0
610
As purchased
19
59 8
16
4.7
.8
495
66.9
20.1
12.7
1.0
910
Leg:
Edible portion
71.7
20.7
6.7
1.1
670
As purcnased
11.7
63.4
18.3
5.8
1.0
585
Leg, cutlets:
Edible portion
70.7
20.3
7.7
1.1
705
As purchased. ...........
3 4
68 3
20 1
7.6
1.0
690
Loin:
Edible portion
69 5
19 9
10.0
1.1
790
As purchased ....
18 9
56 3
16 1
8 2
.9
645
Neck:
Edible portion
72 6
20 3
6.9
1.0
670
31.5
49.9
13.9
4.6
.7
456
Rib:
Edible portion .
69 8
20 2
9 4
1 i
775
25
62.3
15.2
7.1
.8
680
Rump:
Edible portion
62.6
19.8
16.2
1.1
1,060
30 2
43 7
13 8
11.3
.8
735
Shank, hind:
73.6
20.7
5.5
1.0
615
As purchased
61 1
28 6
8
2.2
.4
240
Shoulder, lean:
73 4
20 7
4.6
1.3
580
As purchased..
18 3
59 9
16 9
3.9
1.0
480
Shoulder and flank, medium fat:
Edible portion
65 2
19.7
14.4
1.1
975
As purchased................. ..
23
60 2
15 1
11.0
.9
745
Forequarter:
Edible portion
71 7
20
8.0
.9
710
As purchased............. .
24 5
64 2
16 1
6.0
.7
635
Hind quarter:
Edible portion
70 9
20 7
8.3
1.0
735
As purcnased.. ...... .......
20 7
56 2
16 2
6.6
.8
580
Side, with kidney, fat, and tallow:
71.8
20.2
8.1
1.0
716
As ptiTfthflaari
92."*
56.?.
15.6
6.3
8
566
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Food materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
VEAL, FRESH continued.
Heart as purchased
Per at.
Perct.
73.2
Per ct.
16.8
Perct.
9.6
Perct.
Perct.
1.0
Cols.
72C
Kidnevs as purchased
75.8
16 9
6.4
1.3
585
73
19
5 3
1 3
575
Lungs as purchased
76.8
17.1
5.0
1.1
58C
LAMB, FRESH.
Breast or chuck:
Edible portion
56.2
19.1
23.6
1.0
1,35C
As purchased
19.1
45.5
15.4
19.1
.8
1,09C
Leg, hind:
Edible portion
58.6
18.6
22.6
1.0
1,30C
As purchased
13.8
50.3
16.0
19.7
.9
1.13C
Loin, without kidney and tallow:
Edible portion
53.1
18.7
28.3
1.0
1,54C
As purchased
14 8
45.3
16.0
24.1
.8
1,315
Neck:
Edible portion
56.7
17.7
24.8
1.0
1,37
As purchased
17.7
46.7
14.6
20.4
.8
1,13
Shoulder:
Edible portion
51 8
18 1
29.7
1.0
1,69C
As purchased
20.3
41.3
14.4
23.6
.8
1.26E
Forequarter:
Edible portion
65.1
18.3
26.8
1.0
1.43C
As purchased
18.8
44.7
14.9
21.0
.8
1,16
Hind quarter:
Edible portion
60.9
19.6
19.1
1.0
1.17C
As purchased
15 7
51 3
16 6
16.1
.9
98E
Side, without tallow:
Edible portion
58 2
17.6
23.1
1.1
1.30C
19 3
47
14 1
18 7
.8
1,05
LAMB, COOKED.
Chops, broiled:
Edible portion
47 6
21 7
29 9
1.3
1.66J
As purchased .
13.5
40.1
18 4
26.7
1.2
1,47C
Leg roast
67 1
19 7
12 7
.8
90C
Tongue, spiced and cooked:
Edible portion
67 4
13 9
17.8
.6
1,01C
As purchased
2 6
65 7
13 5
17 3
.5
981
MUTTON, FRESH.
Chuck, lean:
Edible portion
64.7
17 8
16.3
.9
1,02(
As purchased
19 5
52 1
14 3
13 1
.8
820
Chuck:
Edible portion
48 2
14 6
36 8
.8
1.82J
As purchased
19 4
38 5
11 7
30
.7
1,48
Flank:
Edible portion
42 7
14 3
42 6
.7
2,06
As purchased
9.9
39.0
13.8
36.9
.6
1.81J
Leg, hind:
Edible portion
63 2
18 7
17 6
1.0
1.08J
As purchased .....
17.7
61.9
15.4
14.5
.8
90(
Loin, without kidney or tallow:
Edible portion
47 8
15 5
36 2
.8
1,81
As purchased
14.8
40.4
13.1
31.5
.6
l,67f
Neck:
Edible portion
56 6
16 7
26.3
1.0
1.42C
As purchased
26.4
41.5
12.2
19.6
.7
1,05S
Shoulder:
Edible portion
60 2
17.5
21.8
.9
1.24
22 1
46 8
13 7
17.1
.7
97f
Forequarter:
Edible portion
52 9
15.6
30.9
.9
1,596
As purchased
21.2
41.6
12.3
24.5
.7
1,26
Hind quarter:
Edible portion
54.8
16.7
28.1
.8
1,49E
As purchased
17.2
45.4
13.8
23.2
.7
1,23
Side, including tallow:
Edible portion
54.2
16.3
28.9
.9
1,52C
18.1
45.4
13.0
23.1
.7
1,21
Side, not including tallow:
Edible portion
53.6
16.2
29.8
.8
1.56C
19.3
43.3
13.0
24.0
.7
V25E
MUTTON, COOKED.
50.9
25.0
22.6
1.2
L42C
34
28
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Pood materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
MUTTON, ORGANS.
Heart, as purchased
Perct.
Perct.
69 5
Per ct.
16 9
Perct.
12.6
Per ct.
Per ct.
9
Cols.
845
Kidneys as purchased
78 7
16 5
3 2
1 3
440
Liver, as purchased
61.2
23.1
9.0
5.0
1.7
906
MUTTON, CANNED.
Corned as purchased
45 8
28 8
22.8
4 2
1 500
47.6
24.4
24.0
4.8
1,466
PORK, FRESH.
Chuck ribs and shoulder:
Edible portion
51 1
17 3
31 1
9
1 635
As purchased
18.1
41.8
14.1
25.5
.8
1,340
Flank:
Edible portion
59
18 5
22 2
1
1 280
As purchased
18.0
48.5
15.1
18.6
.7
1,065
Ham, fresh:
Edible portion
50.1
15.7
33.4
.9
1.700
As purchased
10.3
45.1
14.3
29.7
.8
1 520
Head:
Edible portion
45.3
13.4
41.3
.7
1,990
As purchased . ..
68 4
13.8
4 1
13 8
2
660
Head cheese:
Edible portion
43.3
19.5
oq Q
3.3
1,790
As purchased
12 1
42 3
18 9
24
3
1 366
Loin (chops):
Edible portion
50 7
16 4
32
.9
1 666
As purchased
19 3
40 8
13 2
26
g
1 340
Loin, tenderloin, as purchased o
66.5
18 9
13
1.0
900
Middle cuts:
Edible portion
48.2
15.7
36.3
.7
1,825
As purchased ... ..
19 7
38 6
12 7
28 9
7
1 456
Shoulder:
51 2
13 3
34 2
.8
1 690
As purchased
12 4
44 9
12
29 8
7
1 480
Side, lard and other fat included:
Edible portion
29 4
9 4
61 7
4
2 780
As purchased
11.2
26.1
8.3
54.8
.4
2,465
Side, not including lard and kidney:
Edible portion o
34 4
9 1
55 3
5
2 505
As purchased
11.6
30.4
8.0
49.0
.5
2,215
Clear backs:
Edible portion d
25.1
6.4
67.6
.4
2,970
As purchased
5 7
23 7
6
63 8
.4
2 805
Clear bellies:
Edible portion
31.4
6 9
60.4
.4
2,675
As purchased
6 2
29 5
6 5
56 6
4
2 510
Back fat, as purchased
7.7
3.6
89.9
.1
3,860
Belly fat as purchased
13 8
5 2
81 9
.2
3 656
Ham fat as purchased
9 1
3 5
88
2
3 780
Jowl fat, as purchased . .
16.0
6.9
78.8
.2
3,435
Feet:
Edible portion /
55.4
15.8
26.3
.8
1,405
As purchased. . .
74 1
14 3
4 1
6.9
.2
365
Tails:
Edible portion
17.4
4.8
77.1
.3
3,340
As purchased .
13 3
15
4 1
66 9
.3
2 900
Trimmings:
Edible portion
23.3
5 4
70.2
.3
3,060
As purchased . .......
7 4
21 6
5 o
65
.3
2 836
PORK ORGANS, ETC.
75.8
11.7
10.3
1.6
655
Heart, as purchased . .... . .
75.6
17 1
6 3
1.0
585
Kidneys as purchased
77 8
15 6
4 8
1 2
490
Liver, as purchased
71.4
21.3
4.5
1.4
1.4
615
Lungs as* purchased .
83 3
11 9
4
.9
390
Marrow as purchased
14 6
2 3
81 2
3 470
Skin, as purchased . . ,
46.3
26.4
22.7
.6
1,450
a Eight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.51, gelatinoids 0.6, and
b Eight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.25, gelatinoids 0.8, and
cEight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.35, gelatinoids 1, and
dEight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.21, gelatinoids 0.6, and
e Eight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.18, gelatinoids 0.6, and
/Eight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.32, gelatinoids 3.5, and
o Eight samples contained an average of lecithin 0.20, gelatinoids 0.6, and "flesh bases
84
flesh bases'
flesh bases'
flesh bases'
flesh bases'
1 0.9 per cent.
1.1 per cent.
1.5 per cent.
0.8 per cent.
0.9 per cent.
2 per cent.
0.6 per cent
29
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Pood materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
PORK, PICKLED, SALTED, AND SMOKED.
Ham, smoked:
Edible portion
Perct.
Perct.
39 8
Perct.
16 5
Perct.
38 8
Per ct.
Perct.
4 7
Cols.
1 945
As purchased
12.2
35.8
14.5
33.2
4.2
1 670
Ham skin as purchased
27.2
15.4
63 7
3 1
2 555
Ham smoked boiled as purchased
51 3
20 2
22 4
6 1
1 320
Ham smoked fried, as purchased
36.6
22.2
83.2
5 8
1*815
Ham, boneless, raw:
Edible portion .
50.1
14.9
28.5
6.0
1 480
As purchased
a3.3
48.5
14.3
27 5
5 8
1 425
Ham, luncheon, cooked:
Edible portion
49.2
22.5
21
5 8
1 305
As purchased
2 1
48 1
22 1
20 6
5 7
1 280
Shoulder, smoked:
Edible portion
37 6
15.5
41 o
6 1
2 020
18 9
30 7
12 6
33
5
1 626
Pigs' tongues, pickled:
Edible portion
58 6
17 7
19 8
3 6
1 165
As purchased
3.2
56.8
17.1
19.1
3.4
1,125
Pig's feet, pickled:
Edible portion
68.2
16.3
14.8
.9
930
As purchased .
35.5
44.6
10.2
9 3
.6
585
Dry-salted backs:
Edible portion
17.3
7.7
72.7
2 8
3,210
As purchased
8.1
15 9
7.1
66 8
2 7
2 950
Dry-salted bellies:
Edible portion
17.7
8.4
72 2
3 4
3 200
As purchased
8 2
16 2
7 7
66 2
8 2
2 935
Salt pork, clear fat, as purchased
7.9
1.9
86 2
3 9
3,670
Salt pork, lean ends:
Edible portion
19.9
8.4
67.1
5 7
2,985
As purchased ... ...
11.2
17.6
7.4
59 6
5 1
2,655
Bacon, smoked:
Edible portion
20.2
10.5
64 8
6 1
2, 930
As purchased
8.7
18 4
9 5
59 4
4 5
2 685
Ribs cooked, as purchased
33.6
24.8
37.6
2.2
2,050
Steak cooked as purchased
33.2
45 4
1 5
2,285
PORK, CANNED.
Brawn boars' brains as purchased
49
25 2
23
4 6
1 440
Boars' heads as purchased
65.3
20.7
22.2
3.3
1,320
Ham deviled as purchased
44.1
19.0
34.1
3.3
1,790
SAUSAGE, b
Aries:
Edible portion
17.2
26.8
50.6
7.3
2,635
As purchased
5.2
16.8
25.4
48.0
6.9
2,495
Banquet:
Edible portion
62.7
18.3
15.7
3.7
1,005
As purchased
1.6
61.7
18.0
15.4
3.6
985
Bologna:
Edible portion
60.0
18.7
17.6
0.3
1,095
As purchased
q O
55.2
18.2
19.7
3.8
1,170
Farmer:
Edible portion
23 2
29 o
42
7 6
2 310
As purchased
3.9
22.2
27.9
40.4
7.3
2,225
Frankfort as purchased
57 2
19 6
18 6
1.1
3.4
1,170
Holsteiner:
Edible portion
25.6
29.4
37.3
3.4
4.3
2,220
As purchased .
2.2
25 1
28 7
36 6
3.3
4.2
2,135
Lyon, pure ham:
Edible portion
32 5
32 3
27 2
8
1 750
As purchased
10.0
29.2
29.1
24 5
7.2
1,675
Pork as purchased
39 8
13
44 2
1.1
2.2
2 126
Pork sausage meat, as purchased
46.2
17.4
32.5
3.4
1,695
Pork and beef chopped together, as pur-
chased .
55.4
19 4
24 1
1.0
1 380
Salmi:
Edible portion
30.5
24.1
39.9
7.0
2,130
As purchased...
9.3
27.6
21.8
36.2
6.4
1,935
Refuse, case.
bin some cases the sum of the percentages of water, protein, fat, and ash in sausage does not make
100. In such cases the difference is estimated as carbohydrates. There are. however, no tests show-
ing the presence of these, and it may be more nearly correct to give no value for carbohydrates.
80
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Food materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
SAUSAGE continued.
Summer:
Edible portion
Perct.
Perct.
23.2
20.9
46.4
43.9
59.6
42.6
72.7
28.9
56.6
49.5
55.5
68.4
66.9
70.1
70.3
71.0
69.3
72.0
72.5
51.2
69.7
69.2
72.8
46.8
56.7
65.8
63.3
47.3
59.5
63.4
64.7
49.2
57.4
57.0
63.9
56.7
53.7
58.5
44.7
66.1
52.0
68.6
69.6
62.7
51.4
61.1
55.5
73.9
73.2
43.3
61.7
48.3
70.2
41.9
48.2
46.0
68.7
Per ct.
26.0
24.5
20.1
28.0
17.9
24.9
14.9
9.9
16.6
14.6
17.8
21.9
22.6
20.8
21.9
19.8
22.4
20.7
24.7
15.5
20.7
21.1
18.7
17.7
21.5
21.6
20.6
14.4
20.4
19.4
18.7
19.0
22.2
21.4
25.7
17.7
39.2
34.6
16.8
24.9
27.8
16.8
22.9
20.5
15.4
18.3
17.4
22.3
17.9
12.0
14.3
13.5
18.9
13.6
15.1
15.0
22.3
Per ct.
44.5
42.1
33.1
22.1
20.6
27.8
9.9
58.5
24.8
21.6
7.2
8.9
10.1
8.2
7.4
6.4
4.2
5.5
1.4
3.3
8.3
8.8
6.1
17.5
21.2
22.1
14.6
12.6
19.2
16.6
13.7
16.2
18.9
20.6
9.4
23.5
4.3
4.9
5.9
8.7
18.4
13.2
5.2
14.5
16.0
19.0
26.1
2.3
5.0
28.0
33.4
37.9
8.1
31.6
36.0
38.3
7.8
Perct.
Perct.
7.7
7.0
3.2
4.4
2.0
6.4
2.8
2.1
2.0
1.8
.9
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.7
1.4
1.4
.8
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.3
.7
1.1
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.2
2.2
1.8
.9
1.3
1.2
1.0
.7
.1
.1
.3
.0
1.3
1.8
.7
.9
.7
1.6
.8
.9
.8
1.4
Cols.
2,360
2,230
1,770
1,485
1,200
1,635
695
2,665
1,355
1,180
765
945
1,000
850
835
810
800
770
695
540
890
880
730
1,205
1,465
1,460
1,155
910
1,350
1,215
1,070
1,185
1,385
1,435
1,065
1,480
1,200
1,090
685
1,015
1,505
1,000
820
1,170
1,086
1,290
1,540
685
720
1,516
1,805
1,950
835
1,710
1,940
2,030
995
As purchased
7.0
Tongue as purchased
Wienerwurst, as purchased
1.6
SAUSAGE, CANNED.
Beef as purchased
Bologna Italian as purchased
F ankf ort as purchased
Oxford as purchased
0.6
Pork: '
Edible portion
As purchased
a 12. 6
18.8
CHICKENS.
Young:
As purchased
Edible portion
Meat not including giblets
Dark meat
Light meat .
Giblets
Liver
2.4
Heart
Gizzard
Broiler:
As purchased
29.1
Edible portion
Meat, not including giblets
Giblets
Capon:
As purchased
17.5
Edible portion
Meat, not including giblets
Giblets
Other:
As purchased
25.2
Edible portion . . . .
Meat not including giblets
Giblets
OTHER FOWL.
Turkey:
As purchased
14.3
Edible portion
Dark meat ...
Light meat
Giblets
Dart jnp.ftt oookp.<1
Light meat, cooked
Young, as purchased
32.4
Young edible portion
Cooked
Heart
Liver
.6
1.2
Gizzard
Duck:
As purchased
15.9
Edible portion
Meat, not including breast or giblets
Breast
Giblets
Duckling:
As purchased
16.2
Edible portion
Meat, not including giblets
Giblets
Green goose:
As purchased
12.2
Edible portion
Meat not including giblets
34
a Refuse liquid.
81
Average chemical composition of different kinds of meat Continued.
Food materials.
Refuse.
Water.
Protein
(Nx
6.25).
Fat.
Total
carbo-
hy-
drates.
Ash.
Fuel
value
per
pound.
OTHER FOWL continued.
Goose:
As purchased
Perct.
11.1
Perct.
48.0
Perct.
14.8
Perct.
25.5
Per ct.
Perct.
1.0
Cols.
1,475
54.0
16.6
28.7
1.1
1.660
51 8
16 2
31.5
1.0
1 755
Giblets
70.0
20.1
8.2
1.7
910
73.8
19.6
6.8
1.0
750
62.6
16.6
15.9
3.7
1.2
1,175
Pigecn:
As purchased
13.6
55.2
19.7
9.5
1.3
915
Edible portion . . .
64.0
22.8
11.0
1.6
1,060
63.2
22.9
12.1
1.4
1,100
Giblets
68.1
22.2
6.2
2.3
845
Squabs:
As purchased
15.6
49.0
15.7
18.6
1.3
1,205
Edible portion
58.0
18.6
22.1
1.6
1,430
66.6
18.5
23.8
1.4
1,470
Giblets
69 8
19 8
7.2
2.0
835
Guinea hen:
As purchased
16.4
57.7
19.4
5.4
1.1
730
69.1
23.1
6.5
1.3
870
68.9
23.4
6.5
1.3
865
Giblets
69 9
20.8
7.1
1.3
865
Pheasant:
As purchased
12.0
61.5
21.6
4.2
1.0
730
69.9
24.4
4.8
1.1
830
70.0
24.7
4.6
1.1
815
Giblets
68.9
20.1
7.2
1.6
880
Russian pheasant:
14.1
61.1
21.5
1.9
1.2
636
71.1
25.0
2.3
1.4
740
70.6
25.7
2.3
1.4
730
atHiA+fl
74.4
21.2
2.2
1.3
665
Quail:
10.5
59.0
22.3
6.1
1.4
835
65.9
26.0
6.8
1.6
935
66.3
25.4
7.0
1.4
945
Giblets
63.0
21.8
6.2
2.3
970
PRESERVED POULTRY MEAT.
Smoked goose breast (including skin and
fat)
35.7
20.1
38.7
5.5
2,210
Smoked goose breast (skin and outer fat
61.3
26.1
4.4
8.0
845
56.0
17.2
22.0
3.0
1,390
56.1
19.4
20.3
2.5
1,390
87.1
2.9
3.3
5.1
1.6
300
91.0
2.4
.2
4.8
1.6
160
07.6
27.7
12.8
2.2
1,246
46.9
20.8
30.0
2.6
1,825
47.4
20.7
29.2
2.7
1,790
66.9
21.8
8.0
1.7
1.6
936
41.3
13.6
38.2
4.3
2.6
2,075
31
o
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY
BERKELEY
Return to desk from which borrowed.
This book is DUE on the last date stamped below.
MAY
LD 21-100m-9,'47(A5702sl6)476
284456