Skip to main content

Full text of "The mediaeval stage"

See other formats


.-vVK-flXy 


UT 


(rpttvnmpmjhm  iHjniiteiiriafte  ijii  tresmar* 
(Jiftrs  tlfm  fiugl  tftfltdm  pmtfm  membi  fa  oxo 
mimH (jfi$at>T$Kffi m  .*--"/»  ,        

wr  ipiciii  nulla  nrtpa  inftat  o  mm  togtn  7  iL 
fraifcmotnroffiiflHo  -    ?    t*   '      y,.^ 


Ittw  tftittnaf  raftim '53 

frntoto  ?tnmt^      fe^ni  nfljin  ffros  mWi 

*     7  j  7  «7'  7  i7«, 

i|uflmtnja  Abaft  liefama  pfetg  ^aran 7  fajj- 

wM  E    ■  ;V.  g  7  I      | 


jtiofo  ftt]^  ni  none  toinp  odW  4111  una 

ft.    J      .    ft  ^    «  '  fffi  ,n,rl1  W 

tift  amtufitr  o  rc*  jitengni  'to^Jl^mo  rii.jTti,  35 at 


wmnufutif' 
i 


£# 


7   7    .7   7 '7     T)'.l',Kf 


T" 


trofet?  tur  nmtigtt  unrro:  mipttm  fttoe 


beginning  of  Dublin  Quern  quaeritis,  FROM  BODLEIAN  RAWLINSON  LITURGICAL  MS.  D.  4 

(14TH  century) 


THE 

MEDIAEVAL  STAGE 


BY 

E.  K.  CHAMBERS 


VOLUME  I 


OXFORD  UNIVERSITY  PRESS 


Oxford  University  Press,  Amen  House,  London  E.C.4 

GLASGOW    NEW  YORK    TORONTO    MELBOURNE    WELLINGTON 

BOMBAY    CALCUTTA    MADRAS     KARACHI    LAHORE    DACCA 

CAPE  TOWN     SALISBURY    NAIROBI     IBADAN    ACCRA 

KUALA  LUMPUR    HONG  KONG 


BR4,  N 


129  J96.-; 


99«M5? 


\o>b 


FIRST  EDITION    I9O3 

REPRINTED   LITHOGRAPHICALLY   IN   GREAT  BRITAIN 

BY   LOWE   &   BRYDONE,  PRINTERS,   LTD.,   LONDON 

FROM    SHEETS   OF  THE    FIRST  EDITION 

1925,    I948,    I954,    1963 


TO  N.  C. 


PREFACE 

Some  years  ago  I  was  thinking  of  a  little  book,  which  now 
may  or  may  not  ever  get  itself  finished,  about  Shakespeare 
and  the  conditions,  literary  and  dramatic,  under  which  Shake- 
speare wrote.  My  proper  task  would  have  begun  with  the 
middle  of  the  sixteenth  century.  But  it  seemed  natural  to 
put  first  some  short  account  of  the  origins  of  play-acting  in 
England  and  of  its  development  during  the  Middle  Ages. 
Unfortunately  it  soon  became  apparent  that  the  basis  for 
such  a  narrative  was  wanting.  The  history  of  the  mediaeval 
theatre  had  never,  from  an  English  point  of  view,  been 
written.  The  initial  chapter  of  Collier's  Annals  of  the  Stage 
is  even  less  adequate  than  is  usual  with  this  slovenly  and 
dishonest  antiquary,  tt  is  with  some  satisfaction  that,  in 
spite  of  the  barrier  set  up  by  an  incorrect  reference,  I  have 
resolved  one  dramatic  representation  elaborately  described 
by  Collier  into  a  soteltie  or  sweetmeat.  More  scholarly 
writers,  such  as  Dr.  A.  W.  Ward,  while  dealing  excellently 
with  the  mediaeval  drama  as  literature,  have  shown  themselves 
but  little  curious  about  the  social  and  economic  facts  upon 
which  the  mediaeval  drama  rested.  Yet  from  a  study  of  such 
facts,  I  am  sure,  any  literary  history,  which  does  not  confine 
itself  solely  to  the  analysis  of  genius,  must  make  a  start. 

An  attempt  of  my  own  to  fill  the  gap  has  grown  into  these 
two  volumes,  which  have,  I  fear,  been  unduly  swelled  by  the 
inclusion  of  new  interests  as,  from  time  to  time,  they  took 
hold  upon  me  ;  an  interest,  for  example,  in  the  light-hearted 
and  coloured  life  of  those  poverelli  of  letters,  the  minstrel 
folk  ;  a  very  deep  interest  in  the  track  across  the  ages  of 
certain  customs  and  symbols  of  rural  gaiety  which  bear  with 
them  the  inheritance  of  a  remote  and  ancestral  heathenism. 
I  can  only  hope  that  this  disproportionate  treatment  of  parts 
has  not  wholly  destroyed  the  unity  of  purpose  at  which,  after 
all,  I  aimed.  If  I  may  venture  to  define  for  myself  the 
formula  of  my  work,  I  would  say  that  it  endeavours  to  state 


vi  PREFACE 

and  explain  the  pre-existing  conditions  which,  by  the  latter 
half  of  the  sixteenth  century,  made  the  great  Shakespearean 
stage  possible.  The  story  is  one  of  a  sudden  dissolution  and 
a  slow  upbuilding.  I  have  arranged  the  material  in  four  Books. 
The  First  Book  shows  how  the  organization  of  the  Graeco- 
Roman  theatre  broke  down  before  the  onslaught  of  Christianity 
and  the  indifference  of  barbarism,  and  how  the  actors  became 
wandering  minstrels,  merging  with  the  gleemen  of  their 
Teutonic  conquerors,  entertaining  all  classes  of  mediaeval 
society  with  spectacula  in  which  the  dramatic  element  was  of 
the  slightest,  and  in  the  end,  after  long  endurance,  coming  to 
a  practical  compromise  with  the  hostility  of  the  Church.  In 
the  Second  Book  I  pass  to  spectacula  of  another  type,  which 
also  had  to  struggle  against  ecclesiastical  disfavour,  and 
which  also  made  their  ultimate  peace  with  all  but  the  most 
austere  forms  of  the  dominant  religion.  These  are  the  ludi 
of  the  village  feasts,  bearing  witness,  not  only  to  their  origin 
in  heathen  ritual,  but  also,  by  their  constant  tendency  to  break 
out  into  primitive  forms  of  drama,  to  the  deep-rooted  mimetic 
instinct  of  the  folk.  The  Third  Book  is  a  study  of  the  process 
by  which  the  Church  itself,  through  the  introduction  of 
dramatic  elements  into  its  liturgy,  came  to  make  its  own 
appeal  to  this  same  mimetic  instinct ;  and  of  that  by  which, 
from  such  beginnings,  grew  up  the  great  popular  religious 
drama  of  the  miracle-plays,  with  its  offshoots  in  the  moralities 
and  the  dramatic  pageants.  The  Fourth  and  final  Book  deals 
summarily  with  the  transformation  of  the  mediaeval  stage,  on 
the  literary  side  under  the  influence  of  humanism,  on  the 
social  and  economic  side  by  the  emergence  from  amongst 
the  ruins  of  minstrelsy  of  a  new  class  of  professional  players, 
in  whose  hands  the  theatre  was  destined  to  recover  a  stable 
organization  upon  lines  which  had  been  departed  from  since 
the  days  of  Tertullian. 

I  am  very  conscious  of  the  manifold  imperfections  of  these 
volumes.  They  are  the  work,  not  of  a  professed  student,  but 
of  one  who  only  plays  at  scholarship  in  the  rare  intervals  of  a 
busy  administrative  life.  They  owe  much  to  the  long-suffering 
officials  of  the  British  Museum  and  the  London  Library,  and 
more  recently  to  the  aid  and  encouragement  of  the  Delegates 


PREFACE  vii 

of  the  Clarendon  Press  and  their  accomplished  staff.  The 
literary  side  of  the  mediaeval  drama,  about  which  much 
remains  to  be  said,  I  have  almost  wholly  neglected.  I  shall 
not,  I  hope,  be  accused  of  attaching  too  much  importance  in 
the  first  volume  to  the  vague  and  uncertain  results  of  folk-lore 


research.  One  cannot  be  always  giving  expression  to  the 
minuter  shades  of  probability.  But  in  any  investigation 
the  validity  of  the  inferences  must  be  relative  to  the  nature 
of  the  subject-matter;  and,  whether  I  qualify  it  in  words  or 
not,  I  do  not,  of  course,  make  a  statement  about  the  intention, 
say,  of  primitive  sacrifice,  with  the  same  confidence  which 
attaches  to  one  about  matters  of  historic  record.  The  burden 
of  my  notes  and  appendices  sometimes  appears  to  me 
intolerable.  My  excuse  is  that  I  wanted  to  collect,  once  for 
all,  as  many  facts  with  as  precise  references  as  possible. 
These  may,  perhaps,  have  a  value  independent  of  any  con- 
clusions which  I  have  founded  upon  them.  And  even  now 
I  do  not  suppose  that  I  have  been  either  exhaustive  or  accurate. 
The  remorseless  ideal  of  the  historian's  duties  laid  down  in  the 
Introduction  aux  Jitndcs  Historiqnes  of  MM.  Langlois  and 
Seignobos  floats  before  me  like  an  accusing  spirit.  I  know 
how  very  far  lam  from  having  reached  that  austere  standard 
of  scientific  completeness.  To  begin  with,  I  had  not  the 
necessary  training.  Oxford,  my  most  kindly  nurse,  maintained 
in  my  day  no  Jicole  des  Chartes,  and  I  had  to  discover  the 
rules  of  method  as  I  went  along.  But  the  greater  difficulty  has 
been  the  want  of  leisure  and  the  spacious  life.  Shades  of  Duke 
Humphrey's  library,  how  often,  as  I  jostled  for  my  turn  at  the 
crowded  catalogue-shelves  of  the  British  Museum,  have  I  not 
envied  those  whose  lot  it  is  to  tread  your  ample  corridors  and 
to  bend  over  your  yellowing  folios !  Amongst  such  happy 
scholars,  the  canons  of  Clio  may  claim  implicit  obedience. 
A  silent  company,  they  '  class '  their  documents  and  '  try ' 
their  sources  from  morn  to  eve,  disturbed  in  the  pleasant  ways 
of  research  only  by  the  green  flicker  of  leaves  in  the  Exeter 
garden,  or  by  the  statutory  inconvenience  of  a  terminal  lec- 
ture.— 

'  Tanagra  !  think  not  I  forget ! ' 

E.  K.  C. 

London,  May,  1903. 


CONTENTS 

Volume  I 


Preface 

List  of  Authorities 


page 
v 

xiii 


BOOK  I.     MINSTRELSY 


CHAP 
I. 


The  Fall  of  the  Theatres 
II.  Mimus  and  Sc6p  . 

III.  The  Minstrel  Life     . 

IV.  The  Minstrel  Repertory  . 


i 

23 
42 

70 


BOOK  II.     FOLK  DRAMA 

V.  The  Religion  of  the  Folk 
VI.  Village  Festivals 
VII.  Festival  Play    . 
VIII.  The  May-Game  . 
IX.  The  Sword-Dance 
X.  The  Mummers'  Play  . 
XL  The  Beginning  of  Winter 
XII.  New  Year  Customs  . 

XIII.  The  Feast  of  Fools. 

XIV.  The  Feast  of  Fools  {continued) 
XV.  The  Boy  Bishop 

XVI.  Guild  Fools  and  Court  Fools 

XVII.  Masks  and  Misrule  . 


89 
116 
146 
160 
182 
205 
228 
249 
274 
301 
336 
372 
39o 


Volume  II 

BOOK  III.     RELIGIOUS  DRAMA 

XVIII.  Liturgical  Plays      ..... 

XIX. .  Liturgical  Plays  {continued)     . 

XX.  The  Secularization  of  the  Plays  . 

XXI.  Guild  Plays  and  Parish  Plays 
XXII.  Guild  Plays  and  Parish  Plays  {continued) 
XXIII.  Moralities,  Puppet-Plays,  and  Pageants 


1 

41 

68 

106 

124 

149 


X 


CONTENTS 


BOOK  IV.  THE  INTERLUDE 


CHAP. 

XXIV.  Players  of  Interludes     . 
XXV.  Humanism  and  Mediaevalism 


page 
179 
199 


APPENDICES 

A.  The  Tribunus  Voluptatum     . 

B.  TOTA    IOCULATORUM    ScENA 

C.  Court  Minstrelsy  in  1306    . 

D.  The  Minstrel  Hierarchy 

E.  Extracts  from  Account  Books 

I.  Durham  Priory  > 
II.  Maxstoke  Priory 

III.  Thetford  Priory  .... 

IV.  Winchester  College 
V.  Magdalen  College,  Oxford  . 

VI.  Shrewsbury  Corporation 
VII.  The  Howards  of  Stoke-by-Nayland,  Essex 
VIII.  The  English  Court     . 

F.  Minstrel  Guilds    ..... 

G.  Thomas  de  Cabham         .... 
H.  Princely  Pleasures  at  Kenilworth 

I.  A  Squire  Minstrel 

II.  The  Coventry  Hock-Tuesday  Show 
I.  The  Indian  Village  Feast    . 
J.  Sword-Dances  ..... 

I.  Sweden  (sixteenth  century). 

II.  Shetland  (eighteenth  century) 
K.  The  Lutterworth  St.  George  Play     . 
L.  The  Prose  of  the  Ass  .... 
M.  The  Boy  Bishop     ..... 
I.  The  Sarum  Office 

II.  The  York  Computus  . 
N.  Winter  Prohibitions      .... 
O.  The  Regularis  Concordia  of  St.  Ethelwold 
P.    The  Durham  Sepulchrum 
Q.  The  Sarum  Sepulchrum 
R.  The  Dublin  Quem  Quaeritis 


229 
230 

234 
238 
240 
240 
244 

245 
246 
248 
250 

255 
256 

258 
262 
263 
263 
264 
266 
270 
270 
271 
276 
279 
282 
282 
287 
290 
306 
310 
312 
315 


CONTENTS 

A  PP. 

S.  The  Aurea  Missa  of  Tournai 
T.  Subjects  of  the  Cyclical  Miracles 
U.  Interludium  de  Clerico  et  Puella 
V.  Terentius  et  Delusor    .... 
W.  Representations  of  Mediaeval  Plays    . 
X.  Texts  of  Mediaeval  Plays  and  Interludes 
I.  Miracle-Plays       .... 
II.  Popular  Moralities 

III.  Tudor  Makers  of  Interludes  . 

IV.  List  of  Early  Tudor  Interludes    . 

SUBJECT  INDEX 


XI 

PAGE 
318 
321 

324 
326 

329 

407 
407 

436 

443 
453 

462 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

[General  Bibliographical  Note.  I  mention  here  only  a  few  works  of 
wide  range,  which  may  be  taken  as  authorities  throughout  these  two 
volumes.  Others,  more  limited  in  their  scope,  are  named  in  the 
preliminary,  notes  to  the  sections  of  the  book  on  whose  subject-matter 
they  bear. — An  admirable  general  history  of  the  modern  drama  is 
W.  Creizenach's  still  incomplete  Geschichte  des  neueren  Dramas  (Band  i, 
Mittelalter  und  Friihrenaissance,  1893;  Bande  ii,  iii,  Renaissance  und 
Reformation,'  1901-3).  R.  Prolss,  Geschichte  des  neueren  Dramas 
(188 1-3),  is  slighter.  The  earlier  work  of  J.  L.  Klein,  Geschichte  des 
Dramas  (13  vols.  1865-76),  is  diffuse,  inconvenient,  and  now  partly 
obsolete.  A  valuable  study  is  expected  from  J.  M.  Manly  in  vol.  iii 
of  his  Specimens  of  the  Pre-Shakespearean  Drama,  of  which  two 
volumes,  containing  selected  texts,  appeared  in  1897.  C.  Hastings, 
Le  TJie'dtre  francais  et  anglais  (1900,  Eng.  trans.  1901),  is  a 
compilation  of  little  merit. — Prof.  Creizenach  may  be  supplemented 
for  Germany  by  R.  Froning,  Das  Drama  des  Mittelalters  (1891).  For 
France  there  are  the  exhaustive  and  excellent  volumes  of  L.  Petit  de 
Julleville's  Histoire  du  Thidtre  en  France  au  Moyen  Age  (Les  Mysteres, 
1880;  Les  Com/diens  en  France  au  Moyen  Age,  1885;  La  Com/die  el 
les  Mceurs  en  France  au  Moyen  Age,  1886;  Repertoire  du  Theatre 
comique  au  Moyen  Age,  1886).  G.  Bapst,  Essai  sur  T Histoire  du 
Theatre  (1893),  adds  some  useful  material  on  the  history  of  the  stage. 
For  Italy  A.  d' Ancona,  Origini  del  Teatro  italiano  (2nd  ed.,  1891),  is 
also  excellent. — The  best  English  book  is  A.  W.  Ward's  History  of 
English  Dramatic  Literature  to  the  death  of  Queen  Anne  (2nd  ed., 
1899).  J.  P.  Collier,  History  of  English  Dramatic  Poetry  (new  ed., 
1879),  is  full  of  matter,  but,  for  various  reasons,  not  wholly  trust- 
worthy. J.  J.  Jusserand,  Le  Thidtre  en  Angleterre  (2nd  ed.,  1881), 
J.  A.  Symonds,  Shakespeare's  Predecessors  in  the  English  Drama 
(1884),  and  G.  M.  Gayley,  Representative  English  Comedies  (1903), 
are  of  value.  Texts  will  be  found  in  Manly's  and  Gayley's  books, 
and  in  A.  W.  Pollard,  English  Miracle  Plays,  Moralities  and 
Interludes  (3rd  ed.,  1898);  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  Dodsley's  Old  Plays 
(15  vols.  1874-6);  A.  Brandl,  Quellen  des  weltlichen  Dramas  in 
England  (1898).  F.  H.  Stoddard,  References  for  Students  of  Miracle 
Plays  and  Mysteries  (1887),  and  K.  L.  Bates  and  L.  B.  Godfrey, 
English  Drama;   a   Working  Basis  (1896),  are   rough  attempts  at 


xiv  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

bibliographies. — In  addition  the  drama  of  course  finds  treatment  in 
the  general  histories  of  literature.  The  best  are:  for  Germany, 
R.  Kogel,  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Literatur  bis  zum  Ausgange  des 
Mittelalters  (1894-7,  a  fragment);  K.  Godeke,  Grundriss  zur 
Geschichte  der  deutschen  Dichtung  aus  den  Quellen  (2nd  ed.,  1884- 
1900);  W.  Scherer,  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Litteratur  (8th  ed., 
1899):  for  France,  L.  Petit  de  Julleville  (editor),  Histoire  de  la 
Langue  el  de  la  Litte'rature  francaises  (1 896-1 900);  G.  Paris.,  La 
Litter ature  francaise  au  Moyen  Age  (2nd  ed.,  1890):  for  Italy, 
A.  Gaspary,  Geschichte  der  italienischen  Litteratur  (1884—9,  Eng. 
transl.  1901):  for  England,  T.  Warton,  History  of  English  Poetry 
(ed  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  1871);  B.  Ten  Brink,  History  of  English 
Literature  (Eng.  trans.  1893-6);  J.  J.  Jusserand,  Literary  History 
of  the  English  People  (vol.  i.  1895);  W.  J.  Courthope,  History  of 
English  Poetry  (vols,  i,  ii.  1895-7);  G.  Saintsbury,  Short  History  of 
English  Literature  (1898),  and,  especially  for  bibliography,  G.  Korting, 
Grundriss  der  Geschichte  der  englischen  Litteratur  (3rd  ed.,  1899). 
The  Periods  of  European  Literature,  edited  by  Prof.  Saintsbury, 
especially  G.  Gregory  Smith,  The  Transition  Period  (1900),  and  the 
two  great  Grundrisse,  H.  Paul,  Grundriss  der  germanischen  Philologie 
(2nd  ed.,  1896-1903),  and  G.  Grober,  Grundriss  der  romanischen 
Philologie  (1 888-1 903),  should  also  be  consulted. — The  beginnings 
of  the  mediaeval  drama  are  closely  bound  up  with  liturgy,  and  the 
nature  of  the  liturgical  books  referred  to  is  explained  by  W.  Maskell, 
A  Dissertation  upon  the  Ancient  Service-Books  of  the  Church  of 
England  (in  Monumenta  Ritualia  Ecclesiae  Anglicanae,  2nd  ed.,  1882, 
vol.  iii) ;  H.  B.  Swete,  Church  Services  and  Service-Books  before  the 
Reformation  (1896);  Procter-Frere,  New  History  of  the  Book  of 
Common  Prayer  (1901).  The  beginnings  of  Catholic  ritual  are 
studied  by  L.  Duchesne,  Origines  du  Culte  chrtiien  (3rd  ed.,  1902, 
Eng.  trans.  1903),  and  its  mediaeval  forms  described  by  D.  Rock, 
The  Church  of  our  Fathers  (1849-53),  an<3  J-  D.  Chambers,  Divine 
Worship  in  England  in  the  Thirteenth  and  Fourteenth  Centuries  (1877). 
The  following  list  of  books  is  mainly  intended  to  elucidate  the 
references  in  the  footnotes,  and  has  no  claim  to  bibliographical 
completeness  or  accuracy.  I  have  included  the  titles  of  a  few  German 
and  French  dissertations  of  which  I  have  not  been  able  to  make  use.] 

Aberdeen  Records.     Extracts  from  the  Council  Register  of  the  Burgh  of 

Aberdeen.   Edited  by  J.  Stuart.   2  vols.  1844-8.   [Spalding  Club,  xii,  xix.] 

Acta  SS.    Acta  Sanctorum  quotquot  toto  orbe  coluntur,  quas  collegit 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xv 

I.  Bollandus.     Operam  continuavit  G.  Henschenius  [et  alii],  1734-1894. 
[In  progress.] 

Ahn.     English  Mysteries  and  Miracle  Plays.     By  Dr.  Ahn.     Trier, 
1867.     [Not  consulted.] 
Alcuin.    See  Dummler. 

Allard.    Julien  l'Apostat.     Par  P.  Allard.     3  vols.  1900-3. 
Allen.     The  Evolution  of  the   Idea  of  God  :    an  Enquiry  into  the 
Origins  of  Religion.     By  Grant  Allen,  1897. 

Alt.     Theater  und  Kirche  in  ihrem  gegenseitigen  Verhaltniss.    Von 
H.  Alt,  1846. 

Anal.  Hymn.  Analecta  Hymnica  Medii  Aevi.  Ediderunt  C.  Blume  et 
G.  M.  Dreves.     57  parts,  1 886-1901.     [In  progress.] 

Ancona.  Origini  del  Teatro  italiano.  Per  A.  d'Ancona,  2nd  ed. 
2  vols.  1 891. 

Ancona,  Sacr.  Rappr.  Sacre  Rappresentazioni  dei  secoli  xiv,  xv  e  xvi, 
raccolte  e  illustrate  per  cura  di  A.  d'Ancona,  1872. 

Anglia.  Anglia :  Zeitschrift  fur  englische  Philologie.  24  vols.  1878- 
1903.     [In  progress.] 

Ann.  Arch.  Annales  Archeologiques,  dirige"es  par  Didron  aine".  28 
vols.  1844-81. 

Antiquarian  Repertory.  The  Antiquarian  Repertory  :  A  Miscellaneous 
assemblage  of  Topography,  History,  Biography,  Customs  and  Manners. 
Compiled  by  F.  Grose  and  T.  Astle.     2nd  ed.  4  vols.  1807. 

Arbois  de  Jubainville,  Civ.  Celt.  La  Civilisation  des  Celtes  et  celle 
de  PEpope'e  homerique.  Par  H.  d' Arbois  de  Jubainville,  1899.  [Vol.  vi 
of  Cours  de  litterature  celtiyue.] 

Arbois  de  Jubainville,  Cyd.  Myth.  Le  Cycle  mythologique  irlandais 
et  la  Mythologie  celtique.  Par  H.  d'Arbois  de  Jubainville,  1884.  [Vol.  ii 
of  same.] 

Archaeologia.  Archaeologia :  or  Miscellaneous  Tracts  relating  to 
Antiquity.  Published  by  the  Society  of  Antiquaries  of  London.  57  vols. 
1770-1901.     [In  progress.] 

Arnold.  The  Customs  of  London,  otherwise  Arnold's  Chronicle. 
Edited  by  F.  Douce,  181 1. 

Ashton.     A  Righte  Merrie  Christmasse  !  ! !     By  J.  Ashton,  n.  d. 
Bahlmann,   Em.      Die    Erneuerer  des  antiken   Dramas   und   ihre 
ersten  dramatischen  Versuche  :  13 14-1478.     Von  P.  Bahlmann,  1896. 

Bahlmann,  L.  D.  Die  lateinischen  Dramen  von  Wimpheling's 
Stylpho  bis  zur  Mitte  des  sechzehnten  Jahrhunderts  :  1480-1550.  Von 
P.  Bahlmann,  1893. 

Bale.  Scriptorum  illustrium  maioris  Britanniae,  quam  nunc  Angliam 
et  Scotiam  vocant,  Catalogus.  Autore  Ioanne  Baleo  Sudouolgio  Anglo. 
2  vols.  Basileae,  Oporinus,  1557-9.  [Enlarged  from  the  edition  in  one 
vol.  of  1548.] 

Bale,  Index.  Index  Britanniae  Scriptorum  quos  ex  variis  bibliothecis 
non  parvo  labore  collegit  Ioannes  Baleus.     Edited  by  R.  L.  Poole  and 


xvi  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

M.  Bateson,  1902.  [Anecdota  Oxoniensia,  Mediaeval  and  Modern 
Series,  ix,  from  a  MS.  compiled  1 549-1 5  57.] 

Bapst.     Essai  sur  1'Histoire  du  Theatre.     Par  G.  Bapst,  1893. 

Barbazan-M£on.  Fabliaux  et  Contes  des  Poetes  francois  des  xi,  xii, 
xiii,  xiv  et  xv  siecles.  Publics  par  E.  Barbazan.  Nouvelle  e'ditibn,  par 
M.  Me"on.    4  vols.  1808. 

Barrett.  Riding  Skimmington  and  Riding  the  Stang.  By  C.  R.  B. 
Barrett,  1895.  [Jotirnal  of  British  Archaeological  Association,  N.  S. 
vol.  i.] 

Barthelemy.  Rational  ou  Manuel  des  divins  Offices  de  Guillaume 
Durand,  Eveque  de  Mende  au  treizieme  siecle.  Traduit  par  M.  C. 
Barthelemy.     5  vols.  1854. 

Bartsch.  Altfranzbsische  Romanzen  und  Pastourellen.  Par  K. 
Bartsch,  1870. 

Bates.     The  English  Religious  Drama.     By  K.  L.  Bates,  1893. 

Bates-Godfrey.  English  Drama:  a  Working  Basis.  By  K.  L. 
Bates  and  L.  B.  Godfrey,  1896. 

Bede,  D.  T.  R.  Venerabilis  Bedae  Opera  quae  Supersunt  Omnia. 
Edidit  J.  A.  Giles.  12  vols.  1843-4.  [The  De  Temporum  Rations  forms 
part  of  vol.  vi.] 

Bede,  E.  H.    See  Plummer. 

B£dier.  Les  Fabliaux.  Etudes  de  Literature  populaire  et  d'Histoire 
litteraire  du  Moyen  Age.    Par  J.  Be'dier,  2nd  ed.  1895. 

Belethus.  Rationale  Divinorum  Officiorum  Auctore  Joanne  Beletho 
Theologo  Parisiensi,  1855.     Un  P-  L.  ccii.] 

Bell.  Ancient  Poems,  Ballads,  and  Songs  of  the  Peasantry  of 
England.     Edited  by  R.  Bell,  1857. 

Berenger-F£raud.  Superstitions  et  Survivances  e'tudides  au  point 
de  vue  de  leur  Origine  et  de  leurs  Transformations.  Par  L.  J.  B. 
Berenger-Fdraud.     4  vols.  1896.  , 

Bernhard.  Recherches  sur  1'Histoire  de  la  Corporation  des  Mend- 
triers  ou  Joueurs  d'Instruments  de  la  Ville  de  Paris.  Par  B.  Bernhard. 
\_Bibl.  de  PEcole  des  Charles,  iii.  377,  iv.  525,  v.  254,  339.] 

Bertrand.  Nos  Origines  :  iv.  La  Religion  des  Gaulois  ;  Les  Druides 
et  le  Druidisme.     Par  A.  Bertrand,  1897. 

Bibl.  des  Chartes.  Bibliotheque  de  l'Ecole  des  Chartes.  Revue 
d'Erudition  consacrde  specialement  a  l'dtude  du  Moyen  Age.  [I  quote 
the  numbers  of  the  annual  volumes,  without  regard  to  the  Se'ries.] 

Bingham.  The  Works  of  Joseph  Bingham.  Edited  by  R.  Bingham. 
New  ed.  10  vols. 

Blomefield.  An  Essay  towards  a  Topographical  History  of  the 
County  of  Norfolk.     By  F.  Blomefield.     2nd  ed.  11  vols.  1805-10. 

Bohck.  Die  Anfange  des  englischen  Dramas.  Von  Dr.  Bdhck,  1890. 
[Not  consulted.] 

Bolton.  The  Counting-Out  Rhymes  of  Children.  By  H.  C.  Bolton, 
1888. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xvii 

BORETIUS.  Capitularia  Regum  Francorum.  Ediderunt  A.  Boretius  et 
V.  Krause.     2  vols.  1883-7.     [M.  G.  H.  Leges,  Sectio  ii.] 

Bourquelot.  Office  de  la  Fete  des  Fous.  Public  par  F.  Bourquelot, 
1858.  [Bulletin  de  la  Socie'te'  arche'ologique  de  Sens,  vol.  vi.  Not  con- 
sulted at  first  hand.] 

Bower.  The  Elevation  and  Procession  of  the  Ceri  at  Gubbio.  By 
H.  M.  Bower,  1897.     [F.  L.  S.] 

Brand.  Observations  on  Popular  Antiquities,  chiefly  illustrating  the 
Origin  of  our  Vulgar  Customs,  Ceremonies,  and  Superstitions.  By 
J.  Brand.     Enlarged  by  Sir  H.  Ellis.     3  vols.  1 84 1-2. 

Brand-Hazlitt.  Observations  on  Popular  Antiquities.  By  J.  Brand. 
Edited  with  additions  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt.     3  vols.  1870. 

Brandl.  Quellen  des  weltlichen  Dramas  in  England  vor  Shakespeare. 
Ein  Erganzungsband  zu  Dodsley's  Old  English  Plays.  Herausgegeben 
von  A.  Brandl,  1898.     [Quellen  und Forschungen,  Ixxx.] 

Brewer.  Letters  and  Papers,  Foreign  and  Domestic,  of  the  Reign  of 
Henry  VIII.  Arranged  and  catalogued  by  J.  S.  Brewer  [and  afterwards 
J.  Gairdner  and  R.  H.  Brodie].  18  vols.  1862-1902.  [Calendars  of  State 
Papers^ 

Brooke.  The  History  of  Early  English  Literature  :  being  the  History 
of  English  Poetry  to  the  Accession  of  King  Alfred.  By  S.  A.  Brooke. 
2  vols.  1892. 

Brooke,  Eng.  Lit.  English  Literature  from  the  Beginning  to  the 
Norman  Conquest.     By  S.  A.  Brooke,  1898. 

Brotanek.  Die  englischen  Maskenspiele.  Von  R.  Brotanek,  1902. 
[  Wiener  Beitrdge  zur  englischen  Philologie,  xv.] 

Brown.  Calendar  of  State  Papers  and  Manuscripts  relating  to  English 
Affairs,  in  the  Archives  and  Collections  of  Venice  and  in  other  Libraries 
of  North  Italy.  Edited  by  H.  F.  Brown  and  R.  Brown.  10  vols.  1864- 
1900. 

Brylinger.  Comoediae  et  Tragoediae  aliquot  ex  Novo  et  Vetere 
Testamento  desumptae.     Basileae,  Brylinger,  1540. 

Burchardus.  Burchardi  Wormaciencis  Ecclesiae  Episcopi  Decre- 
torum  Libri  xx,  1853.     [In  P.  L.  cxl.] 

Burne-Jackson.  Shropshire  Folk-lore:  A  Sheaf  of  Gleanings. 
Edited  by  C.  S.  Burne,  from  the  collections  of  G.  F.  Jackson,  1883. 

Burnet.  A  History  of  the  Reformation  of  the  Church  of  England. 
By  G.  Burnet.     Edited  by  N.  Pocock.     7  vols.  1865. 

BURTON.     Rushbearing.     By  A.  Burton,  1891. 

BURY-GlBBON.     See  GIBBON. 

Campbell.  Materials  for  a  History  of  the  Reign  of  Henry  VII,  from 
documents  in  the  Public  Record  Office.  By  W.  Campbell.  2  vols.  1873-7. 
[R.  S.  lx.] 

Canel.  Recherches  historiques  sur  les  Fous  des  Rois  de  France. 
Par  A.  Canel,  1873. 

Captain  Cox.     See  LANEHAM. 

CHAMBERS.    I  h 


xviii  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Carmina  Burana.     See  Schmeller. 

Caspari.  Eine  Augustin  falschlich  beilegte  Homilia  de  Sacrilegiis. 
Herausgegeben  von  C.  P.  Caspari,  1886.  [Gesellschaft  der  Wissen- 
schaften  zu  Christiania.~\ 

CASSIODORUS.  Cassiodori  Senatoris  Variae.  Recensuit  Theodorus 
Mommsen,  1894.     [M.  G.  H.  Auctores  Antiquissimi,  vol.  xii.] 

Catholicon  Anglicum.  Catholicon  Anglicum  :  an  English-Latin  Word- 
book (1483).     Edited  by  S.  J.  Herrtage,  1881.     [C.  S.  N.  S.  xxx.] 

Cavendish.  The  Life  of  Cardinal  Wolsey.  By  J.  Cavendish.  Edited 
by  S.  W.  Singer.     2  vols.  1825. 

Chambers.  Divine  Worship  in  the  Thirteenth  and  Fourteenth  Cen- 
turies, contrasted  with  the  Nineteenth.     By  J.  D.  Chambers,  1877. 

CHAMPOLLION-FlGEAC.      See  HlLARIUS. 

Chappell.  Old  English  Popular  Music.  By  W.  Chappell.  A  new 
edition  by  H.  E.  Wooldridge.     2  vols.  1893. 

C.  H.  B.  Corpus  Scriptorum  Historiae  Byzantinae.  Editio  emendatior, 
consilio  B.  G.  Niebuhrii  instituta,  1828-97. 

Cherest.  Nouvelles  Recherches  sur  la  Fete  des  Innocents  et  la  Fete 
des  Fous.  Par  A.  Cherest,  1853.  [Bulletin  de  la  Socie'te'  des  Sciences  de 
V  Yonne,  vol.  vii.] 

Child.  The  English  and  Scottish  Popular  Ballads.  Edited  by  F.  J. 
Child.     10  vols.  1882-98. 

Christinas  Prince.     See  HlGGS. 

C.I.  C.  Corpus  Iuris  Civilis.  Editio  altera,  1877—95.  [Vol.  i  contains 
the  Insliluliones,  ed.  P.  Krueger,  and  the  Digesta,  ed.  Th.  Mommsen  ; 
vol.  ii  the  Codex  lustiniani,  ed.  P.  Krueger ;  vol.  iii  the  Novellae 
lustiniani,  ed.  Schoell  and  Kroll.] 

C.  I.  Can.  Corpus  Iuris  Canonici.  Editio  Lipsiensis  secunda :  post 
A.  L.  Richter  curas  .  .  .  instruxit  A.  Friedberg.  2  vols.  1879-81.  [Con- 
tains the  Decretum  of  Gratian  (I-1139),  the  Decretales  of  Gregory  IX 
(1234),  the  Liber  Sexlus  of  Boniface  VIII  (1298),  the  Decretales  of  Cle- 
ment V  and  John  XXII  (1317),  and  the  Extravagantes  (down  to  1484).] 

Civis.  Minutes,  collected  from  the  ancient  Records  and  Accounts  in 
the  Chamber  of  Canterbury.  [By  C.  R.  Bunce  or  W.  Welfitt.  These 
documents,  bound  in  B.  M.  under  press-mark  10,358,  h.  i.,  appear  to  be 
reprints  or  proof-sheets  of  articles,  signed  Civis,  in  the  Kentish  Chronicle 
for  1 801-2.] 

Clarke.  The  Miracle  Play  in  England,  an  account  of  the  Early 
Religious  Drama.     By  S.  W.  Clarke,  n.  d. 

Cl£dat.  Le  Theatre  en  France  au  Moyen  Age.  Par  L.  Cledat,  1896. 
[Classiques  Populaires.] 

Clement.  Histoire  ge'ne'rale  de  la  Musique  religieuse.  Par  F. 
Clement,  i860. 

Clement-H£mery.  Histoire  des  Fetes  civiles  et  religieuses  du  D6- 
partement  du  Nord.     Par  Mme  Clement  (ne'e  H^mery),  1832. 

Cloetta.     Beitrage  zur  Litteraturgeschichte  des  Mittelalters  und  der 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xix 

Renaissance.    Von  W.   Cloetta.     i.  Komodie  und  Tragddie  im  Mittel- 
alter,  1890.     ii.  Die  Anfange  der  Renaissancetragodie,  1S92. 

Cod.  Th.  Codex  Theodosianus.  Edidit  G.  Haenel,  1844.  [Corpus 
fun's  Romani  Ante-Iustiniani,  vol.  ii.] 

Collier.  The  History  of  English  Dramatic  Poetry  to  the  Time  of 
Shakespeare  :  and  Annals  of  the  Stage  to  the  Restoration.  By  J.  P. 
Collier.     New  ed.  1879. 

Collier,  Five  Plays.  Five  Miracle  Plays,  or  Scriptural  Dramas. 
Edited  by  J.  P.  Collier,  1836. 

Collier,  P.  J.  Punch  and  Judy,  with  illustrations  by  G.  Cruikshank. 
Accompanied  by  the  Dialogue  of  the  Puppet-Show,  an  account  of  its 
Origin,  and  of  Puppet-Plays  in  England.    [By  J.  P.  Collier.]    5th  ed.  1870. 

Convbeare.  The  History  of  Christmas.  By  F.  C.  Conybeare,  1899 
[ Journal  of  American  Theology,  vol.  iii.] 

Conybeare,  Key  of  Truth.  The  Key  of  Truth :  a  Manual  of  the 
Paulician  Church.     Edited  and  translated  by  F.  C.  Conybeare,  1898. 

CORTET.  Essai  sur  les  Fetes  religieuses,  et  les  Traditions  popul'aires 
qui  s'y  rattachent.     Par  E.  Cortet,  1867. 

Cotgrave.  A  French-English  Dictionary,  with  another  in  English 
and  French.     By  R.  Cotgrave,  1650. 

County  Folk-Lore.  Examples  of  printed  Folk-Lore.  Vol.  i  (Glouces- 
tershire, Suffolk,  Leicestershire,  and  Rutland),  1S92-5.  Vol.  ii  (North 
Riding  of  Yorkshire,  York,  and  the  Ainsty),  1901.     [F.  L.  S.] 

COURTHOPE.  A  History  of  English  Poetry.  By  W.  J.  Courthope. 
Vols,  i,  ii.     1895-7.     [In  progress.] 

Coussemaker.  Drames  liturgiques  du  Moyen  Age.  Par  E.  de 
Coussemaker,  i860. 

Coussemaker,  Harm.  Histoire  de  l'Harmonie  au  Moyen  Age.  Par 
E.  de  Coussemaker,  1852. 

Cox.     Introduction  to  Folk-Lore.     By  M.  R.  Cox.     2nd  ed.  1897. 

C.  P.  B.  Corpus  Poeticum  Boreale :  the  Poetry  of  the  Old  Northern 
Tongue  from  the  Earliest  Times  to  the  Thirteenth  Century.  Edited  by 
G.  Vigfusson  and  F.  Y.  Powell.     2  vols.  1883. 

Creizenach.  Geschichte  des  neueren  Dramas.  Von  W.  Creizenach. 
Vols  i — iii ,  1893-1903.     [In  progress.] 

Crowest.  The  Story  of  British  Music,  from  the  Earliest  Times  to 
the  Tudor  Period.     By  F.  J.  Crowest,  1896. 

C.  S.  Camden  Society,  now  incorporated  with  the  Royal  Historical 
Society. 

C.  S.  E.  L.  Corpus  Scriptorum  Ecclesiasticorum  Latinorum.  Editum 
consilio  Academiae  Litterarum  Caesareae  Vindobonensis.  41  vols.  1866- 
I900.     [In  progress.] 

Cumont.  Textes  et  Monuments  figures  relatifs  aux  Mysteres  de 
Mithra.     Par  F.  Cumont.     2  vols.  1896-9. 

Cunliffe.  The  Influence  of  Seneca  on  Elizabethan  Tragedy.  An 
Essay  by  J.  W.  Cunliffe,  1893.     [Manchester  dissertation.] 

'    b3 


xx  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Cunningham.  Extracts  from  the  Accounts  of  Revels  at  Court  in  the 
Reigns  of  Queen  Elizabeth  and  King  James  I.  By  P.  Cunningham,  1842. 
[Shakespeare  Society.] 

Cushman.  The  Devil  and  the  Vice  in  the  English  Dramatic  Literature 
before  Shakespeare.  By  L.  W.  Cushman,  1900.  [Studien  zur  englischen 
Philologie,  vi.] 

Cutts.  Parish  Priests  and  their  People  in  the  Middle  Ages  in  England. 
By  E.  L.  Cutts,  1898. 

DankA  Die  Feier  des  Osterfestes.  Von  J.  Dank6,  1872.  [Not 
consulted.] 

Dank6,  Hymn.  Vetus  Hymnarium  Ecclesiasticum  Hungariae.  Edidit 
J.  Danko,  1893. 

David.  Etudes  historiques  sur  la  Podsie  et  la  Musique  dans  la  Cambrie. 
Par  E.  David,  1884. 

Davidson.  Studies  in  the  English  Mystery  Plays.  By  C.  Davidson, 
1892.     [Yale  dissertation,  in  Transactions  of  Connecticut  Academy,  ix.  1.] 

Davies.  Extracts  from  the  Municipal  Records  of  the  City  of  York 
during  the  Reigns  of  Edward  IV,  Edward  V,  and  Richard  III.  By 
R.  Davies,  1843. 

Dawson.  Christmas  :  Its  Origin  and  Associations.  By  W.  F.  Dawson, 
1902. 

D.  C.  A.  A  Dictionary  of  Christian  Antiquities.  Edited  by  Sir  W. 
Smith  and  S.  Cheetham.    2  vols.  1875-80. 

Deimling.  The  Chester  Plays.  Re-edited  from  the  MSS.  by  the  late 
H.  Deimling,  1893.     [E.  E.  T.  S.,  Part  i,  with  Plays  1-13,  only  published.] 

De  la  Fons-Melicocq.  Ceremonies  dramatiques  et  anciens  Usages 
dans  les  Eglises  du  Nord  de  la  France.     Par  A.  de  la  Fons-Melicocq,  1850. 

Denifle.  Chartularium  Universitatis  Parisiensis.  Collegit  H.  Denifle. 
4  vols.  1889-97. 

Desjardins.  Histoire  de  la  Cathddrale  de  Beauvais.  ParG.Desjardins, 
1865. 

Deslyons.  Traitez  singuliers  et  nouveaux  contre  le  Paganisme  du 
Roy  Boit.     Par  J.  Deslyons,  1670. 

Devrient.  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Schauspielkunst.  Von  E. 
Devrient.     2  vols.  1848. 

Didron.     See  Annales  Arcke'ologiques. 

Dieterich.  Pulcinella ;  pompejanische  Wandbilder  und  romische 
Satyrspiele.     Von  A.  Dieterich,  1897. 

Diez.     Die  Poesie  der  Troubadours.     Von  F.  C.  Diez,  1826. 

Diez-Bartsch.  Leben  und  Werke  der  Troubadours.  Von  F.  C.  Diez. 
Zweite  Auflage,  von  K.  Bartsch,  1882. 

Digby  Plays.     See  Furnivall  ;  Sharp. 

Dill.  Roman  Society  in  the  last  Century  of  the  Western  Empire.  By 
S.  Dill.    2nd  ed.  1899. 

Ditchfield.  Old  English  Customs  extant  at  the  present  Time.  By 
P.  H.  Ditchfield,  1896. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxi 

Dixon.  A  History  of  the  Church  of  England  from  the  Abolition  of  the 
Roman  Jurisdiction.     By  R.  W.  Dixon.     6  vols.  1878-1902. 

D.  N.  B.  Dictionary  of  National  Biography.  Edited  by  L.  Stephen 
and  S.  Lee.     66  vols.  1885-1901. 

Doran.    A  History  of  Court  Fools.     By  J.  Doran,  1858. 

DOUCE.  Illustrations  of  Shakspeare,  and  of  Ancient  Manners  :  with 
Dissertations  on  the  Clowns  and  Fools  of  Shakspeare,  and  on  the  English 
Morris  Dance.     By  F.  Douce,  1839. 

Douhet.  Dictionnaire  des  Mysteres.  Par  Jules,  Comte  de  Douhet, 
1854.     [J.  P.  Migne,  Encyclope'die  Thdologique,  Series  II,  vol.  xliii.] 

Drake.     Shakespeare  and  his  Times.     By  N.  Drake.     Paris,  1838. 

Dreux  de  Radier.  Histoire  des  Fous  en  titre  d'Office.  Par 
J.  F.  Dreux  de  Radier,  1768.     [In  Rdcrdations  Historiques.~] 

Dreves.  Zur  Geschichte  der  Fete  des  Fous.  Von  G\  M.  Dreves, 
1894.     \Stimmen  aus  Maria-Laach,  vol.  xlvii.] 

See  also  Analecta  Hymnica. 

Ducange.  Glossarium  mediae  et  infimae  Latinitatis  conditum  a  Du 
Cangio,  auctum  a  monachis  Ordinis  S.  Benedicti,  cum  supplements 
Carpenterii  suisque  digessit  G.  A.  L.  Henschel.  Editio  nova,  aucta  a 
L.  Favre.     10  vols.  1883-7. 

DUCHESNE.  Origines  du  Culte  Chretien  :  Etude  sur  la  Liturgie  avant 
Charlemagne.  Par  l'Abbe"  L.  Duchesne.  2nd  ed.  1898.  [A  3rd  ed.  was 
published  in  1902,  and  a  translation,  by  M.  L.  McLure,  under  the  title  of 
Christian  Worship:  its  Origin  and  Evolution,  in  1903.] 

Dugdale.  Origines  Iuridiciales :  or,  Historical  Memorials  of  the 
English  Laws  .  .  .  Inns  of  Court  and  Chancery.  By  W.  Dugdale.  2nd 
ed.  1671. 

Dugdale,  Monasticon.  Monasticon  Anglicanum  :  or,  the  History  of 
the  Ancient  Abbies  and  other  Monasteries,  Hospitals,  Cathedral  and 
Collegiate  Churches  in  England  and  Wales.  By  Sir  W.  Dugdale.  A 
new  edition  by  J.  Caley,  Sir  H.  Ellis,  and  the  Rev.  B.  Bandinel.  6  vols.  1846. 

Du  Meril.  Origines  latines  du  Theatre  moderne,  publiees  et  annot^es 
par  M.  Eddlestand  Du  Mdril,  1849.  [Has  also  a  Latin  title-page,  Theatri 
Liturgici  quae  Latina  superstant  Monumenta,  etc.  A  facsimile  reprint 
was  issued  in  1896.] 

Du  Meril,  La  Com.  Histoire  de  la  Comedie.  Par  E.  du  Me'ril. 
Period e  primitive,  1864.     [All  published.] 

DUMMLER.  Epistolae  Merowingici  et  Karolini  Aevi.  Recensuit  E.  L. 
Dummler.  3  vols.  1892-9.  \M.G.H.  Epistolae,  iii-v.  The  2nd  vol. 
contains  Alcuin's  letters.] 

DURANDUS.  Rationale  Divinorum  Officiorum  editum  per  .... 
Gulielmum  Duranti.  Haec  editio  a  multis  erroribus  diligenter  correcta. 
[Edidit  N.  Doard.]     Antwerpiae,  1614.    See  Barthelemy. 

Durham  Accounts.  Extracts  from  the  Account  Rolls  of  the  Abbey  of 
Durham.  Edited  by  Canon  Fowler.  3  vols.  1898-1901.  \Surtees  Soc. 
xcix,  c,  ciii.] 


xxii  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

DtJRR.  Commentatio  Historica  de  Episcopo  Puerorum,  vulgo  von 
Schul  Bischofif.  Von  F.  A.  Diirr,  1755.  [In  J,  Schmidt,  Thesaurus  Iuris 
Ecclesiastici  (1774),  iii.  58.] 

Du  Tilliot.  Me"moires  pour  servir  a  l'Histoire  de  la  Fete  des  Foux. 
Par  M.  Du  Tilliot,  Gentilhomme  Ordinaire  de  S.  A.  R.  Monseigneur  le 
Due  de  Berry,  175 1. 

Dyer.  British  Popular  Customs,  Present  and  Past.  By  T.  F. 
Thiselton  Dyer,  1876. 

Ebert.  Die  englischen  Mysterien.  Von  A.  Ebert,  1859.  [Jahrbuch 
fiir  romanische  una1  englische  Literatur,  vol.  i.] 

Eckhardt.  Die  lustige  Person  im  alteren  englischen  Drama  (bis 
1642).     Von  E.  Eckhardt,  1903.     [Palaestra,  xvii ;  not  consulted.] 

E.  H.  Review.  The  English  Historical  Review.  18  vols.  1886-1903. 
[In  progress.] 

Elton.     Origins  of  English  History.     By  C.  I.  Elton.     2nd  ed.  1890. 

Evans.  English  Masques.  With  an  introduction  by  H.  A.  Evans, 
1897.     [  Wariv ick  Library  ?± 

Fabian.  The  New  Chronicles  of  England  and  France.  By  R,  Fabyan. 
Edited  by  H.  Ellis,  181 1. 

Fairholt.  Lord  Mayor's  Pageants.  Edited  by  F.  W.  Fairholt. 
2  vols.  1843-4.     [Percy  Soc.  xxxviii,  xlviii.] 

Feasey.    Ancient  English  Holy  Week  Ceremonial.     By  H.  J.  Feasey, 

1897- 

FISCHER.  Zur  Kunstentwickelung  der  englischen  Tragodie  von  ihren 
ersten  Anfangen  bis  zu  Shakespeare.     Von  R.  Fischer,  1893. 

Fitch.  Norwich  Pageants.  The  Grocers'  Play.  From  a  manuscript 
in  possession  of  R.  Fitch,  1856.  [Extract  from  Norfolk  Archaeology, 
vol.  v.] 

F.  L.  Folk-Lore  :  a  Quarterly  Review  of  Myth,  Tradition,  Institution, 
and  Custom.     14  vols.  1890-1903.     [Organ  of  F.  L.  S.,  in  progress.] 

F.L.  Congress.  The  International  Folk-Lore  Congress,  1891.  Papers 
and  Transactions.     Edited  by  J.  Jacobs  and  A.  Nutt,  1892. 

F.  L.  Journal.  The  Folk-Lore  Journal,  7  vols.  1883-9.  [Organ  of 
F.  L.  S.} 

F.L.  Record.  The  Folk-Lore  Record.  5  vols.  1878-82.  [Organ  oiF.L.S.] 

Fleay.  C.H.  A  Chronicle  History  of  the  London  Stage,  1559-1642. 
By  F.  G.  Fleay,  1890. 

Flogel.    Geschichte  der  Hofnarren.    Von  C.  F.  Flogel,  1789. 

F.  L.  S.= Folk- Lore  Society. 

Fowler.  The  Roman  Festivals  of  the  Period  of  the  Republic  :  an 
Introduction  to  the  Study  of  the  Religion  of  the  Romans.  By  W.  W. 
Fowler,  1899.     [Handbooks  of  Archaeology  and  Antiquities.} 

Fournier.  Le  Theatre  francais  avant  la  Renaissance.  Par  E.  Fournier, 
1872. 

Foxe.  The  Acts  and  Monuments  of  John  Foxe.  With  a  Life  of  the 
Martyrologist  by  G.  Townsend.  [Edited  by  S.  R.  Cattley.]  8  vols.  1843-9. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxiii 

FRAZER.  The  Golden  Bough  :  a  Study  in  Comparative  Religion.  By 
J.  G.  Frazer.    2nd  ed.  3  vols.  1900. 

FRAZER,  Pausanias.  Pausanias's  Description  of  Greece.  Translated 
with  a  commentary  by  J.  G.  Frazer.     6  vols.  1898. 

Frere.  The  Winchester  Troper.  Edited  by  W.  H.  Frere,  1894. 
[Henry  Bradshaw  Society^ 

Frere, Use  of  S arum.     The  Use  of  Sarum.     Edited  by  W.  H.  Frere. 

2  vols.  1898-1901. 

See  also  Procter-Frere. 

Freymond.  Jongleurs  und  Menestrels.  Von  E.  Freymond,  1883. 
[Halle  dissertation.] 

Friedlander.  Darstellungen  aus  der  Sittengeschichte  Roms  in  der 
Zeit  von  August  bis  zum  Ausgang  der  Antonine.  Von  L.  Friedlander. 
6th  ed.  3  vols.  1888-90.     [Das  Theater  is  in  vol.  ii.] 

Froning.  Das  Drama  des  Mittelalters.  Herausgegeben  von  R.Froning. 

3  Parts,  1 89 1.     [Deutsche  National- Litteratur,  xiv.] 

FROUDE.  History  of  England  from  the  Fall  of  Wolsey  to  the  Defeat 
of  the  Spanish  Armada.     By  J.  A.  Froude.     2nd  ed.  1889-95. 

Furnivall.  The  Digby  Plays,  with  an  Incomplete  Morality  of 
Wisdom,  who  is  Christ.  Edited  by  F.  J.  Furnivall,  1882.  [N.  S.  S. 
Series  vii,  1 :  re-issue  for  E.  E.  T.  S.  1896.] 

See  also  Laneham,  Mannyng,  Stafford,  Stubbes. 

Furnivall  Miscellany.  An  English  Miscellany  Presented  to  Dr. 
Furnivall  in  Honour  of  his  Seventy-fifth  Birthday,  1901. 

GAIDOZ.  Etudes  de  Mythologie  gauloise.  Par  H.  Gaidoz.  I.  Le  Dieu 
gaulois  du  Soleil  et  le  Symbolisme  de  la  Roue,  1886.  [Extrait  de  la 
Revue  Arche'ologique,  1 8 84-8 5.] 

GASPARY.  The  History  of  Early  Italian  Literature  to  the  Death  of 
Dante.  Translated  from  the  German  of  A.  Gaspary,  by  H.  Oelsner,  1901. 

GaSTE.  Les  Drames  liturgiques  de  la  Cathedrale  de  Rouen.  Par 
A.  Gaste,  1893.     [Extrait  de  la  Revue  Catholique  de  Normandie.] 

Gatjtier.  Les  Epopees  francaises.  Par  L.  Gautier,  vol.  ii.  2nd  edition, 
1892.  [Lib.  ii.  chh.  xvii-xxi  form  the  section  on  Les  Propagateurs  des 
Chansons  de  Geste.  References  to  this  work  may  be  distinguished  from 
those  to  Les  Tropaires  by  the  presence  of  a  volume-number.] 

GAUTIER,  Bibl.  Bibliographie  des  Chansons  de  Geste.  Par  L.  Gautier, 
1897.     [A  section  on  Les  Propagateurs  des  Chansons  de  Geste.] 

Gautier,  Orig.  Origines  du  Theatre  moderne.  Par  L.  Gautier,  1872. 
[In  Le  Monde.] 

Gautier,  Tropaires.  Histoire  de  la  Poesie  liturgique  au  Moyen  Age. 
Par  L.  Gautier.     Vol.  i.     Les  Tropaires,  1886.     [All  published.] 

Gayley.  Representative  English  Comedies:  from  the  Beginnings  to 
Shakespeare.    Edited  by  C.  M.  Gayley,  1903. 

Gazeau.     Les  Bouffons.     Par  A.  Gazeau,  1882. 

GENEE.  Die  englischen  Mirakelspiele  und  Moralitaten  als  Vorliiufer 
des  englischen  Dramas.     Von  R.  Gende,  1878.     [Serie  xiii,  Heft  305  of 


xxiv  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Sammhing  gemeinverstdndlicher  wissenschaftlicher  Vortrdge,  heraus- 
gegeben  von  R.  Virchow  und  Fr.  v.  Holtzendorff.] 

Gibbon.  The  History  of  the  Decline  and  Fall  of  the  Roman  Empire. 
By  E.  Gibbon.     Edited  by  J.  B.  Bury.     7  vols.  1897-1900. 

Gilpin.  The  Beehive  of  the  Romish  Church.  By  G.  Gilpin,  1579. 
[Translated  from  Isaac  Rabbotenu,  of  Louvain,  1569.] 

Gloucester  F.  L.     See  County  Folk-Lore. 

Goedeke.  Grundriss  zur  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Dichtung,  aus  den 
Quellen.     Von  K.  Goedeke.     2nd  ed.  7  vols.  1 884-1900.     [In  progress.] 

Golden  Legend.  The  Golden  Legend :  or,  Lives  of  the  Saints,  as 
Englished  by  W.  Caxton.  Edited  by  F.  S.  Ellis,  1900,  &c.  [Temple 
Classics.] 

Golther.    Handbuch  der  germanischen  Mythologie.    Von  W.  Gblther, 

1895- 

Gomme.     Ethnology  in  Folk-lore.     By  G.  L.  Gomme,  1892. 

Gomme,  Brit.  Ass.  On  the  Method  of  determining  the  Value  of  Folk- 
lore as  Ethnological  Data.  By  G.  L.  Gomme,  1896.  [In  Report  of  British 
Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science.] 

Gomme,  Nature.  Christmas  Mummers.  By  G.  L.  Gomme,  1897. 
[Nature,  vol.  lvii.] 

Gomme,  Vill.  Comm.  The  Village  Community :  with  special  Reference 
to  the  Origin  and  Form  of  its  Survivals  in  Britain.  By  G.  L.  Gomme,  1890. 
[Contemporary  Science  Series.] 

GOMME,  Mrs.  The  Traditional  Games  of  England,  Scotland,  and 
Ireland,  with  Tunes.  Collected  and  annotated  by  A.  B.  Gomme.  2  vols. 
1894-8.  [Part  i  of  Dictionary  of  British  Folk-Lore,  Edited  by  G.  L. 
Gomme.] 

GOOGE.      See  KlRCHMAYER. 

Gracie.  The  Presentation  in  the  Temple :  A  Pageant,  as  originally 
represented  by  the  Corporation  of  Weavers  in  Coventry,  1836.  [Edited 
by  J.  B.  Gracie  for  the  Abbot sford  Club.] 

GRASS.  Das  Adamsspiel :  anglonormannisches  Gedicht  des  xii.  Jahr- 
hunderts.  Mit  einem  Anhang  '  Die  fiinfzehn  Zeichen  des  jiingsten  Gerichts.' 
Herausgegeben  von  K.  Grass,  1 891.     [Romanische  Bibliothek,  vi.] 

G  RATI  an.     See  C.  L.  Can. 

Greenidge.  Infamia  :  Its  Place  in  Roman  Public  and  Private  Law. 
By  A.  H.  J.  Greenidge,  1894. 

Greg,  Masques.  A  list  of  Masques,  Pageants,  &c.  Supplementary  to 
a  list  of  English  Plays.  By  W.  W.  Greg,  1902.   [Bibliographical  Society] 

Greg,  Plays.  A  List  of  English  Plays  written  before  1643,  and 
published  before  1700.    By  W.  W.  Greg,  1900.    [Bibliographical  Society] 

GREGORY.     Gregorii  Posthuma :    on  Certain  Learned  Tracts  written 
by  John  Gregory.     Published  by  his  Dearest  Friend  J.  G.  1683.     [Part  II 
of  his   Works :    A  separate  title-page  for  Episcopus  Puerorum  in  Die 
Innocentiinn  :  or,  A  Discovery  of  an  Ancient  Custom  in  the  Church  of 
Sarum,  of  making  an  Anniversary  Bishop  among  the  Choristers.] 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxv 

Gregory's  Chronicle.  The  Historical  Collections  of  a  Citizen  of  London 
in  the  Fifteenth  Century.  Edited  by  J.  Gairdner,  III,  William  Gregory's 
Chronicle  of  London.     [C.S.  N.  S.  xvii.] 

Grein-Wulcker.  Bibliothek  der  angelsachsischen  Poesie.  Heraus- 
gegeben  von  C.  W.  M.  Grein.  Neu  bearbeitet,  vermehrt  und  heraus- 
gegeben  von  R.  P.  Wiilcker.     3  vols.  1883-98. 

Grenier.  Introduction  a  l'Histoire  gdneYale  de  la  Province  de  Picardie. 
Par  Dom  Grenier,  1856.  [Memoires  de  la  Socie^te"  des  Antiquaires  de 
Picardie.     Documents  in/dits,  iii.] 

Grimm.  Teutonic  Mythology.  By  J.  Grimm.  Translated  from  the 
4th  ed.  with  notes  and  appendix  by  J.  S.  Stallybrass.     4  vols.  1880-8. 

Grober.  Zur  Volkskunde  aus  Concilbeschliissen  und  Capitularien. 
Von  G.  Grober.     1894. 

Grober,  Grundriss.  Grundriss  der  romanischen  Philologie.  Heraus- 
gegeben  von  G.  Grober.  1 888-1 902.  [In  progress.  Vol.  ii  has  article 
by  G.  Grober  on  Franzosische  Lilteratur.] 

GROOS.  Play  of  Animals.  The  Play  of  Animals  :  a  Study  of  Animal 
Life  and  Instinct.     By  K.  Groos.     Translated  by  E.  L.  Baldwin,  1898. 

Groos.  Play  of  Man.  The  Play  of  Man.  By  K.  Gross.  Translated 
by  E.  L.  Baldwin,  1901. 

Grosse.  Les  Debuts  de  1'Art.  Par  E.  Grosse.  Traduit  par  E.  Dirr. 
Introduction  par  L.  Marillier.  1902.  \Bibliotheque  Scientifique  Interna- 
tionale.} 

Grove.  Dancing.  By  L.  Grove,  and  other  writers.  With  Musical 
examples.     1895.     [Badminton  Lidrary.] 

Gummere,  B.  P.  The  Beginnings  of  Poetry.  By  F.  B.  Gummere, 
1901. 

Gummere,  G.  O.  Germanic  Origins  :  a  Study  in  Primitive  Culture. 
By  F.  B.  Gummere,  1892. 

Gutch.  A  Lytell  Geste  of  Robin  Hood,  with  other  Ballads  relative  to 
Robin  Hood.     Edited  by  J.  M.  Gutch.    2  vols.  1847. 

Guy.  Essai  sur  la  Vie  et  les  OZuvres  litteraires  du  Trouvere  Adan  de 
le  Hale.     Par  H.  Guy,  1898. 

Haddan-Stubbs.  Councils  and  Ecclesiastical  Documents  relating  to 
Great  Britain  and  Ireland.  Edited,  after  Spelman  and  Wilkins,  by  A.  W. 
Haddan  and  W.  Stubbs.     3  vols.  1869-78. 

H addon.  The  Study  of  Man.  By  A.  C.  H addon,  1898.  [Progres- 
sive Science  Series.] 

Haigh.     The  Tragic  Drama  of  the  Greeks.     By  A.  E.  Haigh,  1896. 

Hall.  The  Union  of  the  Families  of  Lancaster  and  York.  By 
E.  Hall.     Edited  by  H.  Ellis.     1809. 

Halliwell-Phillipps.  Outlines  of  the  Life  of  Shakespeare.  By  J. 
O.  Halliwell-Phillipps.     9th  ed.  2  vols.  1890. 

Halliwell-Phillips.  Bevels.  A  Collection  of  Ancient  Documents 
respecting  the  Office  of  Master  of  the  Revels,  and  other  Papers  relating 
to  the  Early  English  Theatre.     [By  J.  O.  Halliwell-Phillipps.]     1870. 


xxvi  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

HAMPSON.  Medii  Aevi  Kalendarium :  or  Dates.  Charters  and 
Customs  of  the  Middle  Ages,  &c.     By  R.  T.  Hampson.     2  vols.  184 1. 

Handlyng  Synne.     See  MANNYNG. 

Harland.  Lancashire  Folk-Lore.  By  J.  Harland  and  T.  T.  Wilkin- 
son, 1867. 

Harris.  Life  in  an  Old  English  Town  :  a  History  of  Coventry  from 
the  Earliest  Times.  Compiled  from  Official  Records  by  M.  D.  Harris, 
1898.     [Social  England  Series.] 

Hartland.  The  Legend  of  Perseus :  a  Study  of  Tradition  in  Story, 
Custom  and  Belief.     By  E.  S.  Hartland.     3  vols.  1894-6. 

HARTLAND.  Fairy  Tales.  The  Science  of  Fairy  Tales  :  an  Inquiry 
into  Fairy  Mythology.  By  E.  S.  Hartland,  1891.  {Contemporary 
Science  Series.] 

Hartzheim.    See  Schannat. 

Hase.  Miracle  Plays  and  Sacred  Dramas.  By  C.  A.  Hase.  Trans- 
lated by  A.  W.  Jackson,  1880. 

Hastings.  Le  Theatre  francais  et  anglais :  ses  Origines  grecques 
et  latines.     Par  C.  Hastings,  1900. 

Hastings.  The  Theatre :  its  Development  in  France  and  England. 
By  C.  Hastings.     Translated  by  F.  A.  Welby,  1901. 

HaUCK.  Kirchengeschichte  Deutschlands.  Von  A.  Hauck.  2nd  ed. 
3  vols.  1896-1900. 

Havard.     Les  Fetes  de  nos  Peres.     Par  O.  Havard,  1898. 

Hazlitt.  Remains  of  the  Early  Popular  Poetry  of  England.  Collected 
and  edited,  with  introductions  and  notes,  by  W.  Carew  Hazlitt.  4  vols. 
1864-6.     [Library  of  Old  Authors.] 

Hazlitt,  E.  D.  S.  The  English  Drama  and  Stage  under  the  Tudor  and 
Stuart  Princes,  1 543-1664,  illustrated  by  a  series  of  Documents,  Treatises, 
and  Poems.     Edited  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  1869.     [Roxburghe  Library.] 

Hazlitt,  Liv.  The  Livery  Companies  of  London.  By  W.  C.  Hazlitt, 
1892. 

Hazlitt,  Manual.  A  Manual  for  the  Collector  and  Amateur  of  Old 
English  Plays.     By  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  1892. 

Hazlitt-Dodsley.  A  Select  Collection  of  Old  Plays.  By  R.  Dodsley. 
Chronologically  arranged,  revised  and  enlarged  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt.  4th  ed. 
15  vols.  1874-6. 

Hazlitt-Warton.  History  of  English  Poetry,  from  the  Twelfth  to 
the  close  of  the  Sixteenth  Century.  By  T.  Warton.  Edited  by  W.  C. 
Hazlitt.     4  vols.  1871. 

H.  B.  S.  =  Henry  Bradshaw  Society. 

Heales.  Easter  Sepulchres  :  their  Object,  Nature,  and  History.  By 
A.  Heales,  1868.     [Arc/iaeologia,  vol.  xlii.] 

Heinzel.  Beschreibung  des  geistlichen  Schauspiels  im  deutschen 
Mittelalter.     Von  R.  Heinzel,  1898.     [Beitrcige  zur  Asthelik,\v.] 

Henderson.  Notes  on  the  Folk-Lore  of  the  Northern  Counties  of 
England  and  the  Borders.     By  W.  Henderson.    2nd  ed.  1879.     [F.L.S.] 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxvii 

Herbert.  Antiquities  of  the  Inns  of  Court  and  Chancery.  By  W. 
Herbert,  1804. 

Herbert,  Liv.  History  of  the  Twelve  Great  Livery  Companies  of 
London.     By  W.  Herbert.     2  vols.  1836-7. 

Hereford  Missal.  Missale  ad  usum  percelebris  Ecclesiae  Herfordensis. 
Edidit  W.  G.  Henderson,  1874. 

Herford.  The  Literary  Relations  of  England  and  Germany  in  the 
Sixteenth  Century.     By  C.  H.  Herford,  1886. 

Herrtrich.  Studien  zu  den  York  Plays.  Von  O.  Herrtrich,  1886. 
[Breslau  dissertation  ;  not  consulted.] 

HlGGS.  The  Christmas  Prince.  By  Griffin  Higgs,  1607.  [In  Miscel- 
lanea Antigua  Anglicana,  1816.] 

Hilarius.  Hilarii  Versus  et  Ludi.  Edidit  J.  J.  Champollion-Figeac, 
1838. 

HlRN.  The  Origins  of  Art :  a  Psychological  and  Sociological  Enquiry. 
By  Yrjo  Hirn,  1900. 

Hist.  cPAtitun.     Histoire  de  1'Eglise  d'Autun.     Autun,  1774. 

Hist.  Lilt.  Histoire  littdraire  de  la  France.  Par  des  Religieux  be'ne- 
dictins  de  la  Congregation  de  S.  Maur.  Continued  par  des  Membres  de 
l'lnstitut.     32  vols.  1 733-1898.     [In  progress.] 

Hist.  MSS.  Reports  of  the  Historical  Manuscripts  Commission,  1883- 
1902.     [In  progress.] 

Hobhouse.  Churchwardens'  Accounts  of  Croscombe,  PiUon,  Yatton, 
Tintinhull,  Morebath,  and  St.  Michael's,  Bath,  1 349-1 560.  Edited  by  E. 
Hobhouse,  1890.     [Somerset  Record  Society,  vol.  iv.] 

HODGKIN.     Italy  and  her  Invaders.     By  T.  Hodgkin.     8  vols.  1892-9. 

HOHLFELD.  Die  altenglischen  Kollektivmisterien,  unter  besonderer 
Berucksichtigung  des  Verhiiltnisses  der  York-  und  Towneley-Spiele.  Von 
A.  Hohlfeld,  1889.     [Anglia,  vol.  xi.] 

Holinshed.  Holinshed's  Chronicles  of  England,  Scotland,  and 
Ireland.     6  vols.  1807-8. 

HOLTHAUSEN.  Noah's  Ark:  or,  the  Shipwright's  Ancient  Play  or 
Dirge.  Edited  by  F.  Holthausen,  1897.  [Extract  from  Goteborg's  Hog- 
s kola's  Arss&rift.] 

Hone.  Ancient  Mysteries  described,  especially  the  English  Miracle 
Plays,  founded  on  Apocryphal  New  Testament  Story,  extant  among  the 
unpublished  Manuscripts  in  the  British  Museum.     By  W.  Hone,  1823. 

Hone,  E.  D.  B.  The  Every  Day  Book  and  Table  Book.  By  W.  Hone. 
3  vols.  1838. 

Household  Ordinances.  A  Collection  of  Ordinances  and  Regulations 
for  the  Government  of  the  Royal  Household,  made  in  divers  Reigns  from 
King  Edward  I II  to  King  William  and  Mary,  1790.  [Society  of  A?itiquaries 
of  London.} 

Hrotsvitha.  Hrotsvithae  Opera.  Recensuit  et  emendavit  P.  de 
Winterfeld,  1902.  [In  Scriptores  Rerum  Germanicarum  in  usum  Schola- 
rum  ex  Monumentis  Germaniae  Historicis  separatim  cditi.] 


xxvih  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Hubatsch.  Die  lateinischen  Vagantenlieder  des  Mittelalters.  Von 
O.  Hubatsch,  1870. 

Indiculus.     See  Saupe. 

Jahn.  Die  deutschen  Opfergebrauche  bei  Ackerbau  und  Viehzucht. 
Ein  Beitrag  von  U.  Jahn,  1884.  {Cermanistische  Abhandlungen,  heraus- 
gegeben  von  Karl  Weinhold,  iii.] 

Jeanroy.     Les  Origines  de  la  Poe"sie   lyrique  en  France  au  Moyen 

Age :    Etudes   de  Literature  francaise  et  comparee,  suivies   de  Textes 

ine"dits.     Par  A.  Jeanroy,  1889. 

Jevons.  An  Introduction  to  the  History  of  Religion.  By  F.  B.  Jevons, 
1896. 

Jevons,  Plutarch.  Plutarch's  Romane  Questions.  Translated  A.D. 
1603  by  Philemon  Holland.  Now  again  edited  by  F.  B.  Jevons.  With 
Dissertations  on  Italian  Cults,  1892. 

See  also  SCHRADER. 

Jones,  Fasti.  Fasti  Ecclesiae  Sarisburiensis,  or  A  Calendar  of  the 
Bishops,  Deans,  Archdeacons,  and  Members  of  the  Cathedral  Body  at 
Salisbury,  from  the  Earliest  Times  to  the  Present.  By  W.  H.  Jones,  1881. 
f  Pages  295-301  contain  an  account  of  the  Boy  Bishop  at  Salisbury.] 

Jordan.  The  Creation  of  the  World.  By  W.  Jordan.  Edited  with  a 
translation  by  Whitley  Stokes,  1863.  [Transactions  of  Philological 
Society.] 

Jubinal.  Jongleurs  et  Trouveres :  Choix  de  Pieces  des  xiiie  et  xiv* 
Siecles.     Par  M.  L.  A.  Jubinal,  1835. 

Jubinal,  Myst.  Mybteres  ine"dits  du  xve  Siecle.  Par  M.  L.  A.  Jubinal. 
2  vols.  1837. 

Jubinal,  N.R.  Nouveau  Recueil  de  Contes,  Dits,  Fabliaux,  et  autres 
Pieces  inddites  des  xiiie,  xive,  et  xve  Siecles.  Par  M.  L.  A.  Jubinal. 
2  vols.  1839-42. 

Julian.  Iuliani  Imperatoris  quae  supersunt.  Recensuit  F.  C.  Hert- 
lein.     2  vols.  1875-6. 

Julleville.    See  Petit  de  Julleville. 

Jusserand.  Le  Theatre  en  Angleterre  depuis  la  Conquete  jusqu'aux 
Pr^decesseurs  imme'diats  de  Shakespeare.  Par  J.  J.  Jusserand.  2nd  ed. 
1881. 

Jusserand,  E.  L.  A  Literary  History  of  the  English  People  from  the 
Origins  to  the  Renaissance.  By  J.  J.  Jusserand.  Vol.  i,  1895.  [In 
progress.] 

Jusserand,  E.  IV.  L.  English  Wayfaring  Life  in  the  Middle  Ages. 
By  J.  J.  Jusserand.  Translated  by  L.  T.  Smith.  4th  ed.  1892.  [The 
English  translation  has  valuable  illustrations.] 

Keary.  The  Vikings  in  Western  Christendom  :  A.D.  789  to  A.D.  888. 
By  C.  F.  Keary,  1891. 

Keller.  Fastnachtspiele  aus  dem  15.  Jahrhundert.  Von  A.  von 
Keller,  1853-8. 

Kelly.     Notices  Illustrative  of  the  Drama,  and  other  Popular  Amuse- 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxix 

ments,  chiefly  in  the  Sixteenth  and  Seventeenth  Centuries,  incidentally 
illustrating  Shakespeare  and  his  Contemporaries ;  extracted  from  the 
Chamberlain's  Accounts  and  other  Manuscripts  of  the  Borough  of  Leices- 
ter.    With  an  introduction  and  notes  by  W.  Kelly,  1865. 

Kemble.  The  Saxons  in  England  :  a  History  of  the  English  Common- 
wealth till  the  Period  of  the  Norman  Conquest.  By  J.  M.  Kemble.  2  vols. 
1849. 

Kempe.  Manuscripts  and  other  rare  Documents  from  the  Reign  of 
Henry  VIII  to  that  of  James  I,  preserved  in  the  Muniment  Room  at 
Loseley  House.     Edited  by  A.  J.  Kempe,  1835. 

Kirchmayer.  The  Popish  Kingdom,  or  reigne  of  Antichrist,  written 
in  Latine  verse  by  Thomas  Naogeorgus  (or  Kirchmayer),  and  englyshed 
by  Barnabe  Googe,  1570.     [See  STUBBES.] 

Klein.  Geschichte  des  Dramas.  Von  J.  L.  Klein.  13  vols.  1865-76. 
Register-Band  von  T.  Ebner,  1886.  [Vol.  ii  contains  'Das  Drama  der 
Romer,'  vol.  iii  '  Die  lateinischen  Schauspiele,'  vols,  xii,  xiii '  Das  englische 
Drama.'] 

"  Knappert.  Le  Christianisme  et  le  Paganisme  dans  1'Histoire  eccld- 
siastique  de  Bede  le  Ve'ne'rable.  Par  L.  Knappert,  1897.  [In  Revue  de 
r Histoire  des  Religions,  vol.  xxxv.] 

Kogel.  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Litteratur  bis  zum  Ausgange  des 
Mittelalters.     Von  R.  Kogel.     2  vols.  1894-7.     [All  published.] 

Koppen.  Beitrage  zur  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Weihnachtsspiele. 
Von  W.  Koppen,  1893. 

Korting.  Geschichte  des  Theaters  in  seinen  Beziehungen  zur  Kunst- 
entwickelung  der  dramatischen  Dichtkunst.  Erster  Band :  Geschichte 
des  griechischen  undromischen  Theaters.     Von  G.  Korting,  1897. 

Korting,  Grundriss.  Grundriss  der  Geschichte  der  englischen  Litte- 
ratur von  ihren  Anfangen  bis  zur  Gegenwart.  Von  G.  Korting.  3rd  ed.  1899. 

Kramer.  Sprache  und  Heimath  der  Coventry-Plays.  Von  M.  Kramer. 
[Not  consulted.] 

Krumbacher.  Geschichte  der  byzantinischen  Litteratur  von  Justinian 
bis  zum  Ende  des  ostromischen  Reiches  (527-1423).  Von  K.  Krumbacher. 
2nd  ed.  1897.  [Vol.  ix.  Pt.  I  of  Handbuch  der  klassischen  Altertums~ 
wissenschaft,  herausgegeben  von  Dr.  I.  von  Muller.] 

Labb£.  Sacrosancta  Concilia.  Studio  Philippi  Labbei  et  Gabrielis 
Cossartii.     17  vols.  1671-2. 

Lacroix.  Dissertation  sur  les  Fous  des  Rois  de  France.  Par  P. 
Lacroix.     [pseud.  P.  L.  Jacob.] 

Laneham.  Captain  Cox,  his  Ballads  and  Books:  or  Robert  Laneham's 
Letter.  Re-edited  by  F.  J.  Furnivall,  1871.  [Ballad  Society,  vii.  Re- 
printed with  slight  alterations  for  N.S.  S.,  series  vi.  14  in  1890.] 

Lang,  et  Litt.  Histoire  de  la  Langue  et  de  la  Literature  francaise, 
des  Origines  a  1900.  Publie*e  sous  la  direction  de  L.  Petit  de  Julleville, 
1 896-1900.  [Tom.  i,  in  two  parts,  covers  the  Moyen  Age  :  the  articles 
are  by  various  specialists.] 


xxx  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Lang,  M.  of  R.  The  Making  of  Religion.  By  A.  Lang.  2nd  ed. 
1900. 

Lang,  M.R.R.  Myth,  Ritual,  and  Religion.  By  A.  Lang.  2  vols. 
1887.     2nd  ed.  1899. 

Lange.  Die  lateinischen  Osterfeiern  :  Untersuchungen  iiber  den  Ur- 
sprung  und  die  Entwickelung  der  liturgisch-dramatischen  Auferstehungs- 
feier.    Von  C.  Lange,  1887. 

Lavoix.  La  Musique  au  Siecle  de  Saint-Louis.  Par  H.  Lavoix. 
[Contributed  to  G.  Raynaud,  Recueil  de  Motets  francais,  vol.  ii.] 

Leach.  The  Schoolboys' Feast.  By  A.  F.  Leach,  1896.  {Fortnightly 
Review,  vol.  lix.] 

Leach,  Beverley  MSS.  Report  on  the  Manuscripts  of  the  Corporation 
of  Beverley.     By  A.  F.  Leach,  1900.     [Hist.  MSS.] 

Leber.  Collection  des  meilleures  Dissertations,  Notices,  et  Traites 
particuliers,  relatifs  a  l'Histoire  de  France.  Par  C.  Leber,  J.  B.  Salgues 
et  J.  Cohen.     20  vols.  1826-38. 

Leicester  F.  L.     See  Country  Folk-Lore. 

Leland.  Iohannis  Lelandi  de  Rebus  Britannicis  Collectanea.  Cum 
T.  Hearnii  praefationibus,  notis,  &c.  Accedunt  de  Rebus  Anglicis  Opu- 
scula  varia.     2nd  ed.  6  vols.  1774. 

Le  Roy.     Etudes  sur  les  Mysteres.     Par  O.  Le  Roy,  1837. 

L.H.  T.  Accounts.  Accounts  of  the  Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Scotland. 
Edited  by  Thomas  Dickson  (vol.  i,  1473-1498)  and  Sir  J.  B.  Paul  (vols,  ii, 
1500-1504;  iii,  1506-1507),  1877-1901. 

Lincoln  Statutes.  Statutes  of  Lincoln  Cathedral.  Arranged  by 
H.  Bradshaw  ;  with  Illustrative  Documents,  edited  by  C.  Wordsworth. 
2  vols.  1892-7. 

LlPENIUS.  Martini  Lipenii  Strenarum  Historia,  1699  [in  J.  G.  Graevius. 
Thesaurus  Antiquitatum  Romanarutn,  xii.  409.] 

Loliee.  La  Fete  des  Fous.  Par  F.  Lolie'e,  1898.  [In  Revue  des 
Revues,  vol.  xxv.] 

London  Chronicle.  A  Chronicle  of  London,  from  1089  to  1483.  [Edited 
by  N.  H.  Nicolas  or  Edward  Tyrrell],  1827. 

Ludus  Coventriae.  Ludus  Coventriae.  A  Collection  of  Mysteries, 
formerly  represented  at  Coventry  on  the  Feast  of  Corpus  Christi.  Edited 
by  J.  O.  Halliwell,  1841  {Shakespeare  Society], 

Luick.  Zur  Geschichte  des  englischen  Dramas  im  xvi.  Jahrhundert. 
Von  K.  Luick,  1898.  [In  Forschungen  zur  neueren  Litteraturgeschichte  : 
Festgabe  fiir  Richard  Heinz  el  i\ 

Maassen.  Concilia  Aevi  Merovingici.  Recensuit  F.  Maassen,  1893. 
[M.  G.  H.  Leges,  Sectio  iii.] 

Machyn.  The  Diary  of  Henry  Machyn,  Citizen  and  Merchant-Taylor 
of  London,  1550-63.     Edited  by  J.  G.  Nichols,  1848.     [C.  S.  o.  s.  xlii.] 

Maclagan.  The  Games  and  Diversions  of  Argyleshire.  By  R.  C. 
Maclagan,  1901.     [F.L.S.] 

Magnin.     Les  Origines  du  Theatre  moderne,  ou  Histoire  du  Ge'nie 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxxi 

dramatique  depuis  le  ler  jusqu'au  xvie  Siecle.  Par  C.  Magnin,  1838. 
[Vol.  i  only  published,  containing  introductory  '  Etudes  sur  les  Origines 
du  Theatre  antique.'  Notes  of  Magnin's  lectures  in  the  Journal  general 
de  V Instruction  publique  (1834-6)  and  reviews  in  the  Journal  des  Savants 
(1846-7)  partly  cover  the  ground  of  the  missing  volumes.] 

Magnin,  Marionnettes.  Histoire  des  Marionnettes  en  Europe.  Par 
C.  Magnin.     2nd  ed.  1862. 

Malleson-Tuker.  Handbook  to  Christian  and  Ecclesiastical  Rome. 
By  H.  M[alleson]  and  M.  A.  R.  T[uker].     3  vols.  1 897-1900. 

Manly.  Specimens  of  the  Pre-Shaksperean  Drama.  With  an  intro- 
duction, notes,  and  a  glossary.  By  J.  M.  Manly.  3  vols.  1897. 
[Atheneeum  Press  Series  ;  2  vols,  only  yet  published.] 

Mannhardt.    Wald-  und  Feld-Kulte.    Von  W.  Mannhardt.     2  vols. 

1875-7- 

Manning.     Oxfordshire  Seasonal  Festivals.     By  P.  Manning,  1897. 

[Folk-Lore,  vol.  viii.] 

Mannyng.  Roberd  [Mannyng]  of  Brunne's  Handlyng  Synne.  Edited 
by  F.  J.  Furnivall,  1862.  [Roxburghe  Club  ;  a  new  edition  promised  for 
E.  E.  T.  S.] 

Mansi.  Sacrorum  Conciliorum  Nova  et  Amplissima  Collectio.  Editio 
novissima  a  patre  J.  D.  Mansi.     30  vols.     Florence,  1769-92. 

Map.    See  Wright. 

Markland.  Chester  Mysteries.  De  deluvio  Noe,  De  occisione  in- 
nocentium.     Edited  by  J.  H.  Markland,  1818.     [Roxburghe  Club.} 

Marquardt-Mommsen.  Handbuch  der  romischen  Alterthiimer. 
Von  J.  Marquardt  und  T.  Mommsen.     3rd  ed.  7  vols.  1881-8. 

Marriott.  A  Collection  of  English  Miracle-Plays  or  Mysteries. 
Edited  by  W.  Marriott.     Basle,  1838. 

Martene.  De  Antiquis  Ecclesiae  Ritibus  Libri  Tres  collecti  atque 
exornati  ab  Edmundo  Martene.  Editio  novissima,  1783.  [This  edition 
has  a  4th  vol.,  De  Monachorum  Ritibus.] 

Martin  of  Braga.  Martin  von  Bracara's  Schrift :  De  Correctione 
Rusticorum,  herausgegeben  von  C.  P.  Caspari,  1883.  [  Videnskabs-Selskab 
of  Christiania.] 

Martinengo-Cesaresco.  Essays  in  the  Study  of  Folk-Songs.  By 
the  Countess  E.  Martinengo-Cesaresco,  1886. 

Martonne.     La  Piete"  du  Moyen  Age.     Par  A.  de  Martonne,  1855. 

Maskell.  The  Ancient  Liturgy  of  the  Church  of  England  according 
to  the  Uses  of  Sarum,  York,  Hereford,  Bangor,  and  the  Roman  Liturgy. 
By  W.  Maskell.     3rd  ed.  1882. 

Maskell,  Mon.  Rit.  Monumenta  Ritualia  Ecclesiae  Anglicanae. 
Occasional  Offices  according  to  the  ancient  Use  of  Salisbury,  &c.  By 
W.  Maskell.     2nd  ed.  3  vols.  1882. 

MAUGRAS.     Les  Comediens  hors  la  Loi.     Par  G.  Maugras,  18S7. 

Mayer.  Ein  deutsches  Schwerttanzspiel  aus  Ungarn.  Von  F.  A. 
Mayer,  1889.     [Zeitschrift fur  Vblkerpsychologie.\ 


xxxii  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Milusine.  Melusine :  Recueil  de  Mythologie,  Litterature  populaire, 
Traditions  et  Usages,  1878,  1883,  &c. 

Merbot.  Aesthetische  Studien  zur  angelsachsischen  Poesie.  Von 
R.  Merbot,  1883. 

Merc.  Fr.     Le  Mercure  de  France.     974  vols.  1724-91. 

Meyer.  Fragmenta  Burana.  Herausgegeben  von  W.  Meyer  aus 
Speyer,  1901.  [Sonderabdruck  aus  der  Festschrift  zur  Feier  des  150- 
jahrigen  Bestehens  der  Koniglichen  Gesellschaft  der  Wissenschaften  zu 
Gottingen.] 

Meyer,  Germ.  Myth.  Germanische  Mythologie.  Par  E.  H.  Meyer,  1891. 

M.  G.  H.  Monumenta  Germaniae  Historiae.  Auspiciis  Societatis 
Aperiendis  Fontibus  Rerum  Germanicarum  Medii  Aevi.  Edidit  G.  H. 
Pertz,  T.  Mommsen,  et  alii,  1826-1902.  [In  progress,  under  various  series, 
as  Auctores  Antiquissimi,  Epistolae,  Leges,  Scriptores,  &c.    Indices,  1890.] 

Michels.  Studien  iiber  die  altesten  deutschen  Fastnachtspiele.  Von 
V.  Michels,  1896.     [Queilen  unci  Forschungen,  Ixxvii.] 

Micklethwaite.  The  Ornaments  of  the  Rubric.  By  J.  T.  Mickle- 
thwaite,  1897.     [Alcuin  Club  Tracts,  1.] 

Milchsack.  DieOster-und  Passionsspiele:  literar-historische  Unter- 
suchungen  iiber  den  Ursprung  und  die  Entwickelung  derselben  bis  zum 
siebenzehnten  Jahrhundert,  vornehmlich  in  Deutschland.  Von  G.  Milch- 
sack.    i,  Die  lateinischen  Osterfeiern,  1880.     [All  published.] 

Miracles  de  Nostre  Dame.  Miracles  de  Nostre  Dame  par  Personnages. 
Publics  d'apres  le  manuscrit  de  la  Bibliotheque  Nationale  par  G.  Paris  et 
U.  Robert.     8  vols.  1876-93.     [Socie'ti  des  Anciens  Textes  Francais.} 

MOGK.  Mythologie.  Von  E.  Mogk.  2nd  ed.  1897-8.  [In  Paul, 
Grundriss,  2nd  ed.  vol.  iii.] 

Mommsen,  C.  I.  L.  Inscriptiones  Latinae  Antiquissimae.  Editio 
Altera.  Pars  Prior.  Cura  Theodori  Mommsen  [et  aliorum],  1893. 
[Corpus  Inscriptionum  Latinarum,  vol.  i.  part  I.] 

See  Marquardt-Mommsen. 

Monaci.  Appunti  per  la  Storia  del  Teatro  italiano.  Per  E.  Monaci, 
1872-5.     \Rivista  di  Filologia  Romanza,  i,  ii.] 

Monasticon.     See  Dugdale. 

Mone.  Schauspiele  des  Mittelalters.  Herausgegeben  und  erklart  von 
F.  J.  Mone.     2  vols.  1846. 

Mone.   Altteutsche  Schauspiele.    Herausgegeben  von  F.  J.  Mone,  1835. 

Monmerqu£-Michel.  Theatre  francais  au  Moyen  Age.  Public* 
d'apres  les  Manuscrits  de  la  Bibliotheque  du  Roi  par  L.  J.  N.  Monmerque' 
et  F.  Michel,  1839. 

MONTAIGLON-RAYNAUD.  Recueil  general  et  complet  des  Fabliaux 
des  treizieme  et  quatorzieme  Siecles.  Par  A.  de  Montaiglon  et  G.  Ray- 
naud.    6  vols.  1872-90. 

Montaiglon-Rothschild.  Recueil  de  Podsies  franchises  des  quin- 
zieme  et  seizieme  Siecles.  Par  A.  de  Montaiglon  et  J.  de  Rothschild. 
13  vols.  1855-78. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxxiii 

MOREAU.  Fous  et  Bouffons.  Etude  physiologique,  psychologique  et 
historique  par  P.  Moreau,  1885. 

Morley.     Memoirs  of  Bartholomew  Fair.     By  H.  Morley,  1859. 

MORLEY,  E.  W.  English  Writers  :  an  Attempt  towards  a  History  of 
English  Literature.     By  H.  Morley.     11  vols.  1887-95. 

MORRIS.  Chester  in  the  Plantagenet  and  Tudor  Reigns.  By  Rupert 
Morris,  1893. 

MORTENSEN,  Medeltidsdramat  i  Frankrike.  By  Dr.  Mortensen,  1899. 
[Not. consulted.] 

MULLENHOFF.  Ueber  den  Schwerttanz.  Von  K.  Miillenhoff,  187 1. 
[In  Festgabenfiir  Gustav  Horneyer,  sum  28.  Juli  1871  (Berlin).  Miillen- 
hoffs  essay  is  contained  in  pages  m  to  147  ;  he  published  additions  to 
it  in  Zeitschriftfiir  deutsches  Alterthum,  xviii.  9  ;  xx.  10.] 

MtJLLER,  E.  Le  Jour  de  l'An  et  les  £trennes,  chez  tous  les  Peuples 
dans  tous  les  Temps.     Par  E.  Miiller,  n.  d. 

Muller,  P.  E.  Commentatio  Historica  de  Genio,  Moribus  et  Luxu 
Aevi  Theodosiani.     By  P.  E.  Muller.     2  parts,  1797-8. 

N.  E.  D.  A  New  English  Dictionary  on  Historical  Principles,  founded 
mainly  on  the  Materials  collected  by  the  Philological  Society.  Edited 
by  J.  A.  H.  Murray,  H.  Bradley,  and  W.  A.  Craigie.  Vols,  1-6,  1888-1903. 
[In  progress.] 

Newell.  Gamesand  Songs  of  American  Children.  ByW.W.Newell,i884. 

Nichols,  Elizabeth.  Progresses  and  Public  Processions  of  Queen 
Elizabeth.     With  historical  notes,  &c,  by  J.  Nichols.     2nd  ed.  3  vols.  1823. 

NICHOLS,  James  I.  Progresses,  Processions,  and  Festivities  of  James  I, 
his  Court,  &c.     By  J.  Nichols.     4  vols.  1828. 

NICHOLS,  Pageants.     London  Pageants.     By  J.  G.  Nichols,  1837. 

Nicholson.  Golspie  :  Contributions  to  its  Folklore.  Edited  by 
E.  W.  B.  Nicholson,  1897. 

Nick.     Hof-  und  Volksnarren.     Von  A.  F.  Nick,  1861. 

Nodes  Shaksperianae.  Noctes  Shaksperianae  :  Papers  edited  by 
C.  H.  Hawkins,  1887.     [Winchester  College  Shakespere  Society.] 

NOLDECHEN.  Tertullian  und  das  Theater.  Von  E.  Noldechen,  1894. 
[Zeitschrift  fur  Kirchengeschichte,  xv.  161.] 

Nor/.  Arch.  Norfolk  Archaeology  :  or,  Miscellaneous  Tracts  relating 
to  the  Antiquities  of  the  County  of  Norfolk,  1847-1903.  [In  progress  : 
transactions  of  Norfolk  and  Norivich  Archaeological  Society^ 

NORRIS.  The  Ancient  Cornish  Drama.  Edited  and  translated  by 
E.  Norris.     2  vols.  1859. 

Northall.  English  Folk-Rhymes:  a  Collection  of  Traditional  Verses 
relating  to  Places  and  Persons,  Customs,  Superstitions,  &c.  By  G.  F. 
Northall,  1892. 

Northern  F.  L.    See  Henderson. 

N.  Q.  Notes  and  Queries:  a  Medium  of  Intercommunication  for 
Literary  Men  and  General  Readers.  107  vols.  1850-1903.  [Ninth 
decennial  series  in  progress.] 

CHAMBERS.     I  Q 


xxxiv  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

JV.  S.  S.  =  New  Shakspere  Society. 

Olrik.  Middelalderens  vandrende  SpillemEend.  By  A.  Olrik,  1887. 
[In  Opuscula  Philologica,  Copenhagen ;  not  consulted.] 

Oporinus.  Dramata  Sacra,  Comoediae  et  Tragoediae  aliquot  e  Veteri 
Testamento  desumptae.     2  vols.     Basileae,  Oporinus,  1547. 

Ordish.  English  Folk-Drama.  By  T.  F.  Ordish,  1891-3.  [Folk- 
Lore,  vols,  ii,  iv.] 

OROSIUS.  Pauli  Orosii  Historiarum  adversus  Paganos  libri  vii. 
Recensuit  C.  Zangemeister,  1882.     [C.  S.  E.  L.  vol.  v.] 

Owen-Blakeway.  A  History  of  Shrewsbury.  [By  H.  Owen  and 
J.  B.  Blakeway.]     2  vols.  1825. 

Padelford.     Old  English  Musical  Terms.     By  F.  M.  Padelford,  1899. 

Paris.  La  Literature  franchise  au  Moyen  Age.  Par  G.  Paris. 
2nd  edition,  1890.     [A  volume  of  the  Manuel  d'ancien  Francais.] 

Paris,  Orig.  Les  Origines  de  la  Poe"sie  Iyrique  en  France  au  Moyen 
Age.     Par  G.  Paris,  1892.     [Extrait  du  Journal  des  Savants.] 

Paston  Letters.  The  Paston  Letters;  1422-1509  A.D.  Edited  by 
J.  Gairdner.     2nd  ed.  4  vols.  1900. 

Paul,  Grundriss.  Grundriss  der  germanischen  Philologie.  Heraus- 
gegeben  von  H.  Paul.     2nd  ed.  1896- 1902.     [In  progress.] 

Pearson.  The  Chances  of  Death  and  other  Studies  in  Evolution. 
By  K.  Pearson.     2  vols.  1897. 

Percy.  Reliques  of  Ancient  English  Poetry.  By  Thomas  Percy. 
Edited  by  H.  B.  Wheatley.  3  vols.  1876.  [Vol.  i  contains  an  Essay  on 
the  Ancient  Minstrels  in  England.] 

Percy,  N.  H.  B.  The  Regulations  and  Establishment  of  the  House- 
hold of  Henry  Algernon  Percy,  the  fifth  Earl  of  Northumberland,  &c. 
Edited  by  T.  Percy,  1827. 

Pertz.    See  M.  G.  H. 

Petit  de  Julleville.  Les  Mysteres.  Par  L.  Petit  de  Julleville. 
2  vols.  1880.  [Forms,  with  three  following,  the  Histoire  du  The'&tre  en 
France^ 

Petit  de  Julleville,  La  Com.  La  Comedie  et  les  Mceurs  en  France 
au  Moyen  Age.     Par  L.  Petit  de  Julleville,  1886. 

Petit  de  Julleville,  Les  Com.  Les  Comddiens  en  France  au  Moyen 
Age.     Par  L.  Petit  de  Julleville,  1889. 

Petit  de  Julleville,  Rep.  Com.  Repertoire  du  Theatre  Comique 
en  France  au  Moyen  Age.     Par  L.  Petit  de  Julleville,  1886. 

See  also  Lang,  et  Litt. 

Pfannenschmidt.  Germanische  Erntefeste  im  heidnischen  und 
christlichen  Cultus  mit  besonderer  Beziehung  auf  Niedersachsen.  Von  H. 
Pfannenschmidt,  1878. 

P.  G.  Patrologiae  Cursus  Completus,  seu  Bibliotheca  Universalis, 
Integra,  Uniformis,  Commoda,  Oeconomica,  Omnium  SS.  Patrum,  Do- 
ctorum  Scriptorumve  Ecclesiasticorum,  &c.  ;  Series  Graeca.  Accurante 
J.  P.  Migne.     161  vols.  1857-66. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxxv 

Philpot.  The  Sacred  Tree  :  or  the  Tree  in  Religion  and  Myth.  By 
Mrs.  J.  H.  Philpot,  1897. 

PlCOT.  .  La  Sottie  en  France.  Par  E.  Picot,  1878.  [In  Romania, 
vol.  vii.] 

Pilot  de  Thorey.  Usages,  Fetes,  et  Coutumes,  existant  ou  ayant 
exists  en  Dauphine".     Par  J.  J.  A.  Pilot  de  Thorey.     2  vols.  1884. 

P.  L.  Patrologiae  Cursus  Completus,  &c.  Series  Latina.  Accurante 
J.  P.  Migne.     221  vols.  1844-64. 

Plummer.     See  Bede,  E.  H. 

Pollard.  English  Miracle  Plays,  Moralities,  and  Interludes  :  Speci- 
mens of  the  Pre- Elizabethan  Drama.  Edited  by  A.  W.  Pollard.  3rd  ed. 
1898. 

See  also  Towneley  Plays. 

Preller.  Rbmische  Mythologie.  Von  L.  Preller.  3rd  ed.  by 
H.  Jordan.     2  vols.  188 1-3. 

Procter-Frere.  A  New  History  of  the  Book  of  Common  Prayer. 
By  F.  Procter.     Revised  and  rewritten  by  W.  H.  Frere,  1901. 

Prolss.  Geschichte  des  neueren  Dramas.  Von  R.  Prolss.  3  vols. 
1881-3. 

Promptorium  Parvulorum.  Promptorium  Parvulorum  seu  Clericorum: 
Lexicon  Anglo-Latinum  Princeps,  Auctore  Fratre  Galfrido  Grammatico 
Dicto,  circa  1440.  Recensuit  A.  Way.  3  vols.  1843-65.  [C.  S.  O.  S.  xxv, 
liv,  lxxxix.] 

Prynne.  Histrio-Mastix.  The  Players  Scourge  or  Actors  Tragedie. 
By  W.  Prynne,  1633. 

Puech.  St.  Jean  Chrysostome  et  les  Mceurs  de  son  Temps.  Par 
A.  Puech,  1 891. 

Ramsay,  F.  E.  The  Foundations  of  England,  or  Twelve  Centuries  of 
British  History;  B.C.  55-A.D.  1154.  By  Sir  J.  H.  Ramsay.  2  vols. 
1898. 

Ramsay,  L.  Y.  Lancaster  and  York:  1399-1485.  By  Sir  J.  H. 
Ramsay.     2  vols.  1892. 

Rashdall.  The  Universities  of  the  Middle  Ages.  By  H.  Rashdall. 
2  vols.  1895. 

Raynaud.  Recueil  de  Motets  francais  des  douzieme  et  treizieme 
Siecles,  avec  notes,  &c,  par  G.  Raynaud.  Suivi  d'une  Etude  sur  la  Mu- 
sique  au  Siecle  de  S.  Louis  par  H.  Lavoix  fils.     2  vols.  1881-3. 

Regularis  Concordia.  De  Consuetudine  Monachorum.  Herausgegeben 
von  W.  S.  Logemann,  1 891-3.     [Anglia,  vols,  xiii,  xv.] 

Reidt.  Das  geistliche  Schauspiel  des  Mittelalters  in  Deutschland. 
Von  H.  Reidt,  1868. 

REINERS.  Die  Tropen-,  Prosen-  und  Prafations-Gesange  des  feierlichen 
Hochamtes  im  Mittelalter.     Von  A.  Reiners,  1884.     [Not  consulted.] 

Reliquiae  Antiquae.     See  Wright-Halliwell. 

Rev.'  Celt.  Revue  Celtique,  dirig^e  par  H.  Gaidoz  [afterwards  H. 
D'Arbois  de  Jubainville],     24  vols.  1890-1903.     [In  progress.] 

C  2 


xxxvi  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Rev.  Hist.  Rel.  Annales  du  Mus^e  Guimet.  Revue  de  l'Histoire  des 
Religions.     46  vols.  1880-1902.     [In  progress.] 

Rev.  T.  P.  Revue  des  Traditions  populaires,  1886,  &c.  [Organ  of 
Societe"  des  Traditions  populaires.'] 

RHYS,  C.  F.  Celtic  Folklore:  Welsh  and  Manx.  By  J. Rhys.  2  vols.  1901. 

Rhys,  C.  H.  Lectures  on  the  Origin  and  Growth  of  Religion  as 
illustrated  by  Celtic  Heathendom.  By  J.  Rhys,  1888.  [The  Hibbert 
Lectures  for  1886.] 

Ribton-Turner.  A  History  of  Vagrants  and  Vagrancy.  By  C.  J. 
Ribton-Turner,  1887. 

RlGOLLOT.  Monnaies  inconnues  des  Eveques  des  Innocens,  des  Fous, 
et  de  quelques  autres  Associations  singulieres  du  meme  Temps.  Par 
M.  J.  R[igollot]  d'Amiens.  Avec  une  introduction  par  C.  L[eber].  2  vols. 
(Texte  et  Planches),  1837. 

Riley.  Memorials  of  London  and  London  Life:  a  series  of  Extracts 
from  the  Archives  of  the  City  of  London,  1276-1419.  Translated  and 
edited  by  H.  T.  Riley,  1868. 

RlMBAULT.  Two  Sermons  Preached  by  the  Boy  Bishop.  Edited  by 
J.  G.  Nichols.  With  an  introduction  giving  an  account  of  the  Festival 
of  the  Boy  Bishop  in  England.  By  E.  F.  Rimbault,  1875.  [Camden 
Miscellany,  vol.  vii.  C.  S.] 

RlTSON.  Ancient  English  Metrical  Romancees.  Selected  and  published 
by  J.  Ritson.  2  vols.  1802.  [Vol.  I  contains  a  Dissertation  on  Romance 
and  Minstrelsy.] 

RlTSON,  Bibl.  Poet.  Bibliographia  Poetica  :  a  Catalogue  of  English 
Poets,  from  the  twelfth  to  the  sixteenth  centuries,  with  an  account  of  their 
Works.     By  J.  Ritson,  1802. 

RlTSON,  Robin  Hood.  Robin  Hood  :  a  Collection  of  all  the  Ancient 
Poems,  Songs,  and  Ballads  now  extant,  relative  to  that  Outlaw.  Edited 
by  J.  Ritson,  1795. 

RlTSON,  Songs.  Ancient  Songs  and  Ballads,  from  Henry  II  to  the 
Revolution.     By  J.  Ritson.    3rd  ed.,  revised  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  1877. 

Ritual  Commission.  Second  Report  of  the  Commissioners  Appointed 
to  Inquire  into  the  Rubrics,  Orders,  and  Directions  for  Regulating  the 
Course  and  Conduct  of  Public  Worship,  &c.,  1868.  [A  Parliamentary 
paper.  Appendix  E  (pp.  399-685)  is  a  reprint  of  Injunctions  and  Visita- 
tion Articles  from  1561  to  1730.] 

ROCK.  The  Church  of  our  Fathers,  in  St.  Osmund's  Rite  for  Salisbury, 
&c.     By  D.  Rock.     3  vols.  1849-53. 

Romania.  Romania  :  Recueil  trimestriel  consacre'  a  l'Etude  des  Langues 
et  des  LitteVatures  romanes.     32  vols.  1872-1903.     [In  progress.] 

ROSCHER,  Lexicon.  Ausfiihrliches  Lexicon  der  griechischen  und 
rbmischen  Mythologie.  Herausgegeben  von  W.  H.  Roscher,  1884-97. 
[In  progress.] 

Rovenhagen.  Alt-englische  Dramen.  I.  Die  geistlichen  Schauspiele. 
Von  Prof.  Dr.  Rovenhagen,  1879. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxxvii 

R.  .S\  =  Rerum  Britannicarum  Medii  Aevi  Scriptores,  or,  Chronicles 
and  Memorials  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland  during  the  Middle  Ages. 
Published  under  the  direction  of  the  Master  of  the  Rolls,  1858-99.  [Rolis 
Series.] 

Rymer.  Foedera,  Conventiones,  Literae,  et  cuiuscumque  generis  Acta 
Publica.     Accurante  Thoma  Rymer.     20  vols.  1704-35. 

SAINTSBURY.  A  Short  History  of  English  Literature.  By  G.  Saintsbury, 
1898. 

Saintsbury,  Ren.  The  Earlier  Renaissance.  By  G.  Saintsbury,  1901. 
[Periods  of  European  Literature,  v.] 

Salvian.  Salviani  Presbyteri  Massiliensis  Opera  Omnia.  Recensuit 
Franciscus  Pauly,  1883.  [C.S.E.L.  viii.  The  references  in  the  text  are 
to  the  De  Gubernatione  Dei.] 

Sandys.  Christmastide  :  its  History,  Festivities,  and  Carols.  By  W. 
Sandys,  n.  d. 

Sandys,  Carols.  Christmas  Carols,  Ancient  and  Modern,  &c.  With 
an  introduction  and  notes  by  W.  Sandys,  1833. 

Sarum  Breviary.  Breviarium  ad  usum  insignis  Ecclesiae  Sarum. 
Lahore  F.  Procter  et  C.  Wordsworth.     3  vols.  1882-6. 

Sarum  Manual.     See  York  Manual. 

Sarum  Missal.  Missale  ad  usum  insignis  et  praeclarae  Ecclesiae 
Sarum.     Lahore  et  studio  F.  H.  Dickinson,  1861-83. 

Sarum  Processional.  Processionale  ad  usum  Sarum.  Edited  by  W. 
G.  Henderson,  1882.  [From  Rouen  edition  of  1508.]  See  Wordsworth, 
Proc. 

SATHAS.  'loropinav  8oic[p.iov  ?rep\  tov  dtdrpov  Kai  rrjs  /xovctik^s  tS>u  fiv^avTiviav . 
By  K.  N.  Sathas,  Venice,  1878. 

SAUPE.  Der  Indiculus  Superstitionum  et  Paganiarum  :  ein  Verzeichnis 
heidnischer  und  aberglaubischer  Gebrauche  und  Meinungen  aus  der  Zeit 
Karls  des  Grossen.     Von  H.  A.  Saupe,  189 1.     [Leipziger  Programm.] 

Schack.  Geschichte  der  dramatischen  Litteraturund  Kunst  in  Spanien. 
Von  A.  F.  von  Schack.     3  vols.  1845-6. 

SCHAFF.  History  of  the  Christian  Church.  By  P.  Schaff.  2nd  ed. 
12  vols.  1883-93. 

Schaffer.  Geschichte  des  spanischen  Nationaldramas.  Von  A. 
Schaffer,  1890. 

SCHANNAT.  Concilia  Germaniae,  quae  J.  F.  Schannat  primum  collegit, 
deinde  J.  Hartzheim  auxit.     11  vols.  1759-90. 

SCHELLING.  The  English  Chronicle  Play  :  a  Study  in  the  Popular 
Historical  Literature  environing  Shakespeare.     By  F.  E.  Schelling,  1902. 

Scherer.  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Litteratur.  Von  W.  Scherer. 
8th  ed.  1899.  [Eng.  transl.  from  3rd  ed.  by  Mrs.  F.  C.  Conybeare, 
1886.] 

SCHMELLER.  Carmina  Burana  :  lateinische  und  deutsche  Lieder  und 
Gedichte  einer  Handschrift  des  xiii.  Jahrhunderts  aus  Benedictbeuem. 
Herausgegeben  von  J.  A.  Schmeller,  3rd  edition,  1894. 


xxxviii  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Schmidt.  Die  Digby-Spiele.  Von  K.  Schmidt,  1884.  [Berlin  dis- 
sertation :  continued  in  Anglia,  vol.  viii.] 

Schmitz.  Die  Bussbiicher  und  die  Bussdisciplin  der  Kirche.  Von 
H.  J.  Schmitz,  1883. 

Schonbach.  Uber  die  Marienklagen.  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Geschichte 
der  geistlichen  Dichtung  in  Deutschland.     Von  A.  E.  Schonbach,  1874. 

Schrader.  Reallexicon  der  indo-germanischen  Altertumskunde.  Von 
O.  Schrader,  1901. 

Schrader-Jevons.  Prehistoric  Antiquities  of  the  Aryan  People. 
Translated  from  the '  Sprachvergleichung  und  Urgeschichte '  of  O.  Schrader 
by  F.  B.  Jevons,  1890. 

Schucking.  Studien  iiber  die  stofflichen  Beziehungen  der  englischen 
Komodie  zur  italienischen  bis  Lilly.  Von  L.  L.  Schucking,  1901.  [Studien 
zur  englischen  Philologie,  ix.] 

Schultz.  Das  hdfische  Leben  zur  Zeit  der  Minnesinger.  Von 
A.  Schultz.     2  vols.  2nd  edition,  1889. 

Seifert.  Wit-und-Science  Moralitaten.  Von  J.  Seifert,  1892.  [Not 
consulted.] 

Sepet.  Les  Prophetes  du  Christ.  £tude  sur  les  Origines  du  Theatre 
au  Moyen  Age.  Par  Marius  Sepet,  1878.  [First  published  in  Bibl.  des 
Charles,  vols,  xxviii,  xxix,  xxxviii,  from  which  I  quote.] 

SEPET,  D.  C.  Le  Drame  Chretien  au  Moyen  Age.  Par  Marius  Sepet, 
1878. 

Sepet,  Or.  Origines  catholiques  du  Theatre  moderne.  Par  Marius 
Sepet,  1901. 

Sharp.  A  Dissertation  on  the  Pageants  or  Dramatic  Mysteries, 
anciently  performed  at  Coventry.     By  T.  Sharp,  1825. 

Sharp.  Digby  Plays.  Ancient  Mysteries  from  the  Digby  Manuscripts 
in  the  Bodleian.     Edited  by  T.  Sharp,  1835.     [Abbolsford  Club.] 

Sh.-Jahrbuch.  Jahrbuch  der  Deutschen  Shakespeare-Gesellschaft. 
38  vols.  1 865-1902. 

Simpson.  The  Buddhist  Praying-wheel :  a  Collection  of  Material 
bearing  upon  the  Symbolism  of  the  Wheel  and  Circular  Movements  in 
Custom  and  Religious  Ritual.     By  W.  Simpson,  1896. 

SlTTL.     Die  Gebarden  der  Griechen  und  Romer.     Von  C.  Sittl,  1890. 

Smith,  Gregory.  The  Transition  Period.  By  G.  Gregory  Smith, 
1900.     \Periods  of  European  Literature] 

Smith,  Robertson.  Lectures  on  the  Religion  of  the  Semites  :  First 
Series,  The  Fundamental  Institutions.  By  W.  Robertson  Smith.  2nded. 
1894. 

SMITH,  Toulmin.  English  Gilds:  Original  Ordinances  of  more  than 
a  Hundred  Gilds.    Edited  with  notes  by  J.  T.  Smith,  1870.    [E.  E.  T.  S.  xl.] 

SORGEL.  Die  englischen  Maskenspiele.  Von  G.  Sorgel,  1882. 
[Halle  dissertation.] 

S.  P.  Dom.  Calendar  of  State  Papers,  Domestic  Series,  of  the  Reigns 
of  Edward  VI,  Mary,  Elizabeth,  and  James  I.     12  vols.  1856-72. 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xxxix 

Specht.  Geschichte  des  Unterrichtswesens  in  Deutschland.  Von 
F.  A.  Specht,  1885. 

Spence.     Shetland  Folk-Lore.     By  J.  Spence,  1899. 

Stafford.  A  Compendious  or  Brief  Examination  of  Certain  Ordinary 
Complaints.  By  W.  Stafford,  1581.  Edited  by  F.  J.  Furnivall,  1876. 
[N.  S.  S.  Series  vi.  3.] 

Stephens-Hunt.  A  History  of  the  English  Church.  Edited  by 
W.  R.  W.  Stephens  and  W.  Hunt.     4  vols.  1899-1902.     [In  progress.] 

Stoddard.  References  for  Students  of  Miracle  Plays  and  Mysteries. 
By  F.  H.  Stoddard,  1887.  [University  of  California  Library  Bulletin, 
No.  viii.] 

Stowe,  Annals.  Annales,  or  a  general  Chronicle  of  England.  By 
J.  Stowe.     Continued  to  the  end  of  1631  by  E.  Howes,  1631. 

Stowe,  Survey.  A  Survey  of  London.  By  J.  Stowe.  Edited  by 
W.  J.  Thorns,  1876. 

Strutt.  The  Sports  and  Pastimes  of  the  People  of  England :  in- 
cluding the  Rural  and  Domestic  Recreations,  May  Games,  Mummeries, 
Shows,  Processions,  Pageants,  and  Pompous  Spectacles,  from  the  earliest 
Period  to  the  present  Time.     By  J.  Strutt.     New  ed.  by  W.  Hone,  1833. 

STUBBES.  The  Anatomie  of  Abuses.  By  Phillip  Stubbes,  1583. 
Edited  by  F.  J.  Furnivall,  1877-82.  [N.  S.  S.  Series  vi.  4,  6,  12.  Part  I 
contains  Barnaby  Googe's  translation  (1570)  of  Kirchmayer's  Regnwn 
Papismi  (1553),  Bk.  iv.] 

Suffolk  F.  L.     See  County  Folk-Lore. 

Swete.  Church  Services  and  Service-Books  before  the  Reformation. 
By  H.  B.  Swete,  1896. 

Swoboda.  John  Heywood  als  Dramatiker.  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Entwick- 
lungsgeschichte  des  englischen  Dramas.  Von  W.  Swoboda,  1 888.  [  Wiener 
Beitrdge  zur  deutschen  und  englischen  Philologie,  iii  :  not  consulted.] 

Symonds.  Shakspere's  Predecessors  in  the  English  Drama.  By 
J.  A.  Symonds,  1884. 

TABOUROT.  Orchesographie;  par  Thoinot  Arbeau  [pseud,  for  Jehan 
Tabourot],  1588.  R&mpression  pre'ce'dee  d'une  notice  sur  les  Danses  du 
xvie  Siecle,  par  Laure  Fonta,  1888. 

Ten  Brink.  History  of  English  Literature.  By  B.  Ten  Brink. 
Translated  from  the  German.  3  vols.  1893-6.  [All  published;  a  2nd 
German  edition,  by  A.  Brandl,  in  progress.] 

TERTULLIAN.  Quinti  Septimi  Florentis  Tertulliani  Opera.  Ex  re- 
censione  Augusti  Reifferscheid  et  Georgii  Wissowa.  Pars  i.  1890  [vol.  xx 
of  Corpus  Scriptorum  Ecclesiasticorum  Latinorum.  The  De  Spectaculis 
and  De Idololatria  are  in  this  vol.,  and  are  translated,  with  the  Apologeticus, 
in  vol.  xi  of  the  Ante-Nicene  Christian  Library,  1869.  The  complete 
works  of  Tertullian  are  also  in  P.  L.  vols,  i  and  ii.] 

TEUFFEL.  Teuffel's  History  of  Roman  Literature.  Revised  and  en- 
larged by  L.  Schwabe.  Authorized  translation  from  the  5th  German 
edition  by  G.  C.  W.  Warr.     2  vols.  189 1. 


xl  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Thiers.  Iohannis  Baptistae  Thiers,  de  Festorum  Dierum  Imminu- 
tione  Liber,  1668. 

•Thiers.  Traite-  des  Jeux  et  des  Divertissemens  qui  peuvent  etre 
permis.     Par  J.-B.  Thiers,  1686. 

TlCKNOR.  History  of  Spanish  Literature.  By  G.  Ticknor.  6th 
American  ed.     3  vols.  1888. 

Tiersot.  Histoire  de  la  Chanson  populaire  en  France.  Par  J.  Tiersot, 
1889. 

Tille,  D.  W.  Die  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Weihnacht.  Von 
A.  Tille,  1893. 

Tille,  Y  and  C.  Yule  and  Christmas :  Their  Place  in  the  Germanic 
Year.    By  G.  Tille,  1899. 

TORRACA.  II  Teatro  italiano  dei  Secoli  xiii,  xiv,  e  xv.  Per  F.  Torraca, 
1885. 

Towneley  Plays.  The  Towneley  Mysteries.  Edited  by  J.  Raine,  with 
preface  by  J.  Hunter  and  glossary  by  J.  Gordon,  1836.     [Surlees  Soc.  iii.] 

Towneley  Plays.  Re-edited  from  the  unique  MS.  by  G.  England,  with 
side-notes  and  introduction  by  A.  W.  Pollard,  1897.  [E.  E.  T.S.  E.  S. 
Ixxi.] 

Trad.  La  Tradition  :  Revue  g£ne"rale  des  Contes,  Legendes,  Chants, 
Usages,  Traditions  et  Arts  populaires. 

Ungemacht.  Die  Quellen  der  fiinf  ersten  Chester  Plays.  Von  H. 
Ungemacht,  1890. 

USENER.  Religionsgeschichtliche  Untersuchungen.  Von  H.  Usener. 
3  vols.  1889-99. 

Use  of  S arum.     See  Frere. 

Vacandard.  L'Idolatrie  dans  la  Gaule.  Par  E.  Vacandard,  1899. 
[In  Revue  des  Questions  historiques,  vol.  lxv.] 

Variorum.  The  Plays  and  Poems  of  William  Shakespeare.  With 
a  Life  of  the  Poet  and  an  Enlarged  History  of  the  Stage.  By  the  late 
E.  Malone.     Edited  by  J.  Boswell.     21  vols.  1821. 

VAUX.  Church  Folklore.  By  the  Rev.  J.  E.  Vaux,  1894.  [A  2nd  ed. 
was  published  in  1902.] 

Venetian  Papers.     See  Brown. 

Viel  Testament.  Le  Mistere  du  Viel  Testament.  Public  avec  intro- 
duction, notes  et  glossaire  par  le  Baron  J.  de  Rothschild.  6  vols.  1878-91. 
[Socie't/  des  Anciens  Textes  Erancais.] 

VlOLLET-LE-Duc.  Ancien  Theatre  francois :  depuis  les  Mysteres 
jusqu'a  Corneille.     Par  E.  L.  N.  Viollet-le-Duc.     10  vols.  1854-7. 

VoGT.  Leben  und  Dichten  der  deutschen  Spielleute  im  Mittelalter. 
Von  F.  Vogt,  1876. 

Wackernagel.  Geschichte  der  deutschen  Litteratur.  Ein  Hand- 
buch  von  W.  Wackernagel.     2nd  ed.  by  E.  Martin,  1879. 

Wackernell.  Altdeutsche  Passionsspiele  aus  Tirol.  Von  J.  E. 
Wackernell,  1897. 

Wallaschek.     Primitive  Music :   an  Inquiry   into  the   Origin  and 


LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES  xli 

Developnient  of  Music,  Songs,  Instruments,  Dances,  and  Pantomimes  of 
Savage  Races.     By  R.  Wallaschek,  1893. 

Walter.  Das  Eselsfest.  Von  A.  Walter,  1885.  [In  Caecilien- 
Kalender,  75.] 

Ward.  A  History  of  English  Dramatic  Literature  to  the  Death  of 
Queen  Anne.     By  A.  W.  Ward.     2nd  ed.  3  vols.  1899. 

Warton.    See  Hazlitt-Warton. 

Wasserschleben.  Die  Bussordnungen  der  abendlandischen  Kirche. 
Von  F.  W.  H.  Wasserschleben,  1851. 

Weber.  Geistliches  Schauspiel  und  kirchliche  Kunst  in  ihrem  Ver- 
haltnis  erlautert  an  einer  Ikonographie  der  Kirche  und  Synagoge.  Von 
P.  Weber,  1894. 

WECHSSLER.  Die  romanischen  Marienklagen.  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Ge- 
schichte  des  Dramas  im  Mittelalter.     Von  E.  Wechssler,  1893. 

WESTERMARCK.  A  History  of  Human  Marriage.  By  E.  Wester- 
marck.     2nd  ed.  1894. 

Wetzer-Welte.  Kirchenlexicon.  Von  H.  J.  Wetzer  und  B.  Welte. 
2nd  ed.  by  J.  Hergenrother  and  F.  Kaulen.  12  vols.  1882-1900.  [In 
progress.] 

WlECK.  Der  Teufel  auf  der  mittelalterlichen  Mysterienbuhne.  Von 
H.  Wieck,  1887.     [Marburg  dissertation  :  not  consulted.] 

Wilken.  Geschichte  der  geistlichen  Spiele  in  Deutschland.  Von  E. 
Wilken,  1872. 

Wilkins.  Concilia  Magnae  Britanniae  et  Hiberniae,  446-1717. 
Accedunt  Constitutiones  et  alia  ad  Historiam  Ecclesiae  Anglicanae  Spe- 
ctantia.     4  vols.  1737. 

Wilmotte.  Les  Passions  allemandes  du  Rhin  dans  leur  Rapport 
avec  l'ancien  Theatre  francais.  Par  M.  Wilmotte,  1898.  [Ouvrages 
couronnh  et  antres  Memoir es  publies  par  VAcademie  Roy  ale  de  Bel- 
gique,  lv.] 

Winchester  Troper.     See  Frere. 

Wirth.  Die  Oster-  und  Passionsspiele  bis  zum  xvi.  Jahrhundert.  Von 
L.  Wirth,  1889. 

WlSSOWA.  Religion  und  Kultus  der  Romer.  Von  G.  Wissowa,  1902. 
[Vol.  v,  Part  4  of  I.  von  Midler's  Handbuch  der  classischen  Altertums- 
wissenschaft.'] 

WOOD,  Athenae.  Athenae  Oxonienses,  an  Exact  History  of  all  Writers 
and  Bishops  who  have  had  their  Education  in  the  University  of  Oxford. 
By  Anthony  a  Wood.     2nd  ed.  by  P.  Bliss.     4  vols.  1813-20. 

WOOD,  Hist.  Univ.  History  and  Antiquities  of  the  University  of 
Oxford.  By  Anthony  a  Wood.  Now  first  published  in  English  with  con- 
tinuation by  J.  Gutch.     2  vols.  1792-6. 

Wood-Martin.  Traces  of  the  Elder  Faiths  of  Ireland.  By  W.  G. 
Wood-Martin.     2  vols.  1902. 

Wordsworth.  Notes  on  Mediaeval  Services  in  England,  with  an 
index  of  Lincoln  Ceremonies.     By  C.  Wordsworth,  1898. 


xlii  LIST  OF  AUTHORITIES 

Wordsworth,  Proc.  Ceremonies  and  Processions  of  the  Cathedral 
Church  of  Salisbury.  Edited  by  C.  Wordsworth,  1901.  [From  Salisbury 
Chapter  MS.  148  of  1 1 445,  a  book  for  use  by  the  principalis  persona  in 
the  choir,  and  supplementary  to  the  printed  Processional.] 

WRIGHT.  Early  Mysteries  and  other  Latin  Poems  of  the  Twelfth  and 
Thirteenth  Centuries.     By  T.  Wright,  1838. 

Wright,  Chester  Plays.  The  Chester  Plays.  Edited  by  Thomas 
Wright.     2  vols.  1843.     [Shakespeare  Society. ,] 

Wright,  Map.  The  Latin  Poems  commonly  attributed  to  Walter 
Mapes.     Collected  and  edited  by  T.  Wright,  1841.     [C.  S.  O.  S.  xvii.] 

Wright-Halliwell.  Reliquiae  Antiquae:  Scraps  from  Ancient 
Manuscripts,  illustrating  chiefly  Early  English  Literature  and  the  English 
Language.     By  T.  Wright  and  J.  O.  Halliwell.     2  vols.  1841. 

Wright-Wulcker.  Anglo-Saxon  and  Old  English  Vocabularies.  By 
T.  Wright.     Edited  and  collated  by  R.  P.  Wulcker.     2  vols.  1884. 

WuLCKER.  Grundriss  zur  Geschichte  der  angelsachsischen  Litteratur: 
mit  einer  Obersicht  der  angelsachsischen  Sprachwissenschaft.  Von  R. 
Wulcker,  1885. 

Wylie.  A  History  of  England  under  Henry  IV.  By  J.  H.  Wylie. 
4  vols.  1884-98. 

York  Breviary.  Breviarium  ad  usum  insignis  Ecclesiae  Eboracensis. 
Edidit  S.  W.  Lawley.     2  vols.  1880-2.     [Surtees  Soc.  lxxi,  Ixxv.] 

York  Manual.  Manuale  et  Processionale  ad  usum  insignis  Ecclesiae 
Eboracensis.  Edidit  W.  G.  Henderson,  1875.  [Surtees  Soc.  Ixiii.  Con- 
tains also  Sarum  Manual.] 

York  Missal.  Missale  ad  usum  insignis  Ecclesiae  Eboracensis.  Edidit 
W.  G.  Henderson.     2  vols.  1874.     [Surtees  Soc.  lix,  lx.] 

York  Plays.  The  Plays  performed  by  the  Crafts  or  Mysteries  of  York 
on  the  Day  of  Corpus  Christi.     Edited  by  L.  T.  Smith,  1885. 

Z.f.  d.  A.  Zeitschrift  fur  deutsches  Alterthum  [afterwards  added  und 
deutsche  Literatur],  1841-1903.     [In  progress.] 

Z.f.  rom.  Phil.  Zeitschrift  fur  romanische  Philologie,  1877-1903.  [In 
progress.] 

Zschech.  Die  Anfange  des  englischen  Dramas.  Von  Dr.  Zschech, 
1886.     [Not  consulted.] 


BOOK  I 


MINSTRELSY 


C'est  une   etrange   entreprise   que   celle  de   faire   rire    les 
honnetes  gens.— J.-B.  POQUELIN  DE  MOLIERE. 

Moliere  est  un  infame  histrion.— J.-B.  BOSSUET. 


CHAPTER   I 
THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES 

[Bibliographical  Note.  —  A  convenient  sketch  of  the  history  of  the 
Roman  stage  will  be  found  in  G.  Korting,  Geschichte  des  griechischen 
und  romischen  Theaters  (1897).  The  details  given  in  L.  Friedlander, 
Sittengeschichte  Rotns  in  der  Zeit  von  August  bis  zum  Ausgang  der 
Antonine  (vol.  ii,  7th  ed.  1901),  and  the  same  writer's  article  on  Die 
Spiele  in  vol.  vi  of  Marquardt  and  Mommsen's  Handbuch  der  romischen 
Alterthiimer  (2nd  ed.  1885),  may  be  supplemented  from  E.  Noldechen's 
article  Tertullian  und  das  Theater  in  Zeitschrift  fur  Kirchengeschichte, 
xv  (1894),  161,  for  the  fabulae  Atellanae  from  A.  Dieterich,  Pulcinella 
(1897),  chs.  4-8,  and  for  the  pantomimi  from  C.  Sittl,  Die  Gebdrden 
der  Criechen  und  Romer  (1890),  ch.  13.  The  account  in  C.  Magnin, 
Les  Origines  du  Theatre  moderne  (vol.  i,  all  published,  183S),  is  by 
no  means  obsolete.  Teuffel  and  Schwabe,  History  of  Latin  Litera- 
ture, vol.  i,  §§  3-18  (trans.  G.  C.  W.  Warr,  1891),  contains  a  mass  of 
imperfectly  arranged  material.  The  later  history  of  the  Greek  stage  is 
dealt  with  by  P.  E.  Miiller,  Commentatio  historica  de  genio,  vwribus  et 
luxu  aevi  Theodosiani  (1798),  vol.  ii,  and  A.  E.  Haigh,  Tragic  Drama  of 
the  Greeks  (1896),  ch.  6.  The  ecclesiastical  prohibitions  are  collected  by 
\V.  Prynne,  Histriomastix  (1633),  and  J.  de  Douhet,  Dictio7inaire  des 
Mysteres  (1&54),  and  their  general  attitude  summarized  by  H.Alt,  Theater 
und  Kirche  in  ihrein  gegenseitigen  Verhaltniss  (1846).  S.  Dill,  Roman 
Society  in  the  Last  Centwy  of  the  Roman  Empire  (2nd  ed.  1899),  should 
be  consulted  for  an  admirable  study  of  the  conditions  under  which  the 
pre-mediaeval  stage  came  to  an  end.] 

Christianity,  emerging  from  Syria  with  a  prejudice 
against  disguisings  1,  found  the  Roman  world  full  of  scenici. 
The  mimetic  instinct,  which  no  race  of  mankind  is  wholly 
without,  appears  to  have  been  unusually  strong  amongst  the 
peoples  of  the  Mediterranean  stock.  A  literary  drama  came 
into  being  in  Athens  during  the  sixth  century,  and  estab- 
lished itself  in  city  after  city.  Theatres  were  built,  and 
tragedies  and  comedies  acted  on  the  Attic  model,  wherever 
a  Greek  foot  trod,  from  Hipola  in  Spain  to  Tigranocerta  in 
Armenia.     The  great  capitals  of  the  later  Greece,  Alexandria, 

1  Deuteronomy,  xxii.  5,  a  com-  cit.)    asserts,    'non    amat     falsum 

monplace  of  anti-stage  controversy  auctor    veritatis ;     adulterium     est 

from  Tertullian  (deSpectaculis,c.  23)  apud  ilium  omne  quod  fingitur.' 
to  Histrio-Mastix.    Tertullian  (loc. 

CHAMBERS.     I  B 


2  MINSTRELSY 

Antioch,  Pergamum,  rivalled  Athens  itself  in  their  devotion 
to  the  stage.  Another  development  of  drama,  independent 
of  Athens,  in  Sicily  and  Magna  Graecia,  may  be  distinguished 
as  farcical  rather  than  comic.  After  receiving  literary  treat- 
ment at  the  hands  of  Epicharmus  and  Sophron  in  the  fifth 
century,  it  continued  its  existence  under  the  name  of  mime 
(fujxos),  upon  a  more  popular  level.  Like  many  forms  of 
popular  drama,  it  seems  to  have  combined  the  elements  of 
farce  and  morality.  Its  exponents  are  described  as  buffoons 
(yekaiToiToioi,  Tiaiyvioypa^oi)  and  dealers  in  indecencies  (avai- 
<rxyvToypd(f)OL),  and  again  as  concerning  themselves  with  ques- 
tions of  character  and  manners  (?)#oAoyoi,  aperaXoyoi).  They 
even  produced  what  sound  singularly  like  problem  plays 
(v7ro0f'o-as).  Both  qualities  may  have  sprung  from  a  common 
root  in  the  observation  and  audacious  portrayal  of  contem- 
porary life.  The  mime  was  still  flourishing  in  and  about 
Tarentum  in  the  third  century  \ 

Probably  the  Romans  were  not  of  the  Mediterranean  stock, 
and  their  native  ludi  were  athletic  rather  than  mimetic.  But 
the  drama  gradually  filtered  in  from  the  neighbouring  peoples. 
Its  earliest  stirrings  in  the  rude  farce  of  the  satara  are 
attributed  by  Livy  to  Etruscan  influence 2.  From  Campania 
came  another  type  of  farce,  the  Oscum  ludicrum  or  fabula 
Atellana,  with  its  standing  masks  of  Maccus  and  Bucco, 
Pappus  and  Dossennus,  in  whom  it  is  hard  not  to  find  a 
kinship  to  the  traditional  personages  of  the  Neapolitan  corn- 
media  dell  arte.  About  240  B.  C.  the  Greek  Livius  Andro- 
nicus  introduced  tragedy  and  comedy.  The  play  now 
became  a  regular  element  in  the  spectacida  of  the  Roman 
festivals,  only  subordinate  in  interest  to  the  chariot-race  and 
the  gladiatorial  show.  Permanent  theatres  were  built  in  the 
closing  years  of  the  Republic  by  Pompey  and  others,  and 
the  number  of  days  annually  devoted  to  ludi  scenici  was  con- 
stantly on  the  increase.  From  48  under  Augustus  they 
grew  to  101  under  Constantius.     Throughout  the  period  of 

1  J.  Denis,  La  Comedie  grecque  not     intended    for    representation 

(1886),  i.  50,  106  ;  ii.  535.     The  so-  (Croiset,  Hist,  de  la  Litt.  grecque, 

called    mimes    of    Herodas    (third  v.  174). 

cent.  B.  c.)  are  literary  pieces,  based  2  Livy,  vii.  2 ;  Valerius  Maximus, 

probably  on  the  popular  mime  but  ii.  4.  4  (364  B.  a). 


•    THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  3 

the  Empire,  indeed,  the  theatre  was  of  no  small  political 
importance.  On  the  one  hand  it  was  the  rallying  point  of 
all  disturbers  of  the  peace  and  the  last  stronghold  of  a 
public  opinion  debarred  from  the  senate  and  the  forum ;  on 
the  other  it  was  a  potent  means  for  winning  the  affection  of 
the  populace  and  diverting  its  attention  from  dynastic 
questions.  The  scenici  might  be  thorns  in  the  side  of  the 
government,  but  they  were  quite  indispensable  to  it.  If  their 
perversities  drove  them  from  Italy,  the  clamour  of  the  mob 
soon  brought  them  back  again.  Trajan  revealed  one  of  the 
arcana  imperii  when  he  declared  that  the  amiona  and  the 
spectacula  controlled  Rome1.  And  what  was  true  of  Rome 
was  true  of  Byzantium,  and  in  a  lesser  degree  of  the  smaller 
provincial  cities.  So  long  as  the  Empire  itself  held  together, 
the  provision  firstly  of  corn  and  secondly  of  novel  ludi  re- 
mained one  of  the  chief  preoccupations  of  many  a  highly 
placed  official. 

The  vast  popular  audiences  of  the  period  under  consider- 
ation cared  but  little  for  the  literary  drama.  In  the  theatre 
of  Pompey,  thronged  with  slaves  and  foreigners  of  every 
tongue,  the  finer  histrionic  effects  must  necessarily  have  been 
lost 2.  Something  more  spectacular  and  sensuous,  something 
appealing  to  a  cruder  sense  of  humour,  almost  inevitably  took 
their  place. .  There  is  evidence  indeed  that,  while  the  theatres 
stood,  tragedy  and  comedy  never  wholly  disappeared  from 
their  boards  3.  But  it  was  probably  only  the  ancient  master- 
pieces that  got  a  hearing-  Even  in  Greece  performances  of 
new  plays  onlclassical  models  cannot  be  traced  beyond  about 
the  time  of  Hadrian.  And  in  Rome  the  tragic  poets  had  long 
before  then  learnt  to  content  themselves  with  recitations  and 
to  rely  for  victims  on  the  good  nature,  frequently  inadequate, 
of  their  friends4.     The^  s^lted_dramas  of  Sejieca^were_the 

1  Juvenal,  x.  81 ;   Dion  Chryso-  given  at  from  17,580  to  40,000,  that 

stom,  Or.  xxxii.  370,  18  M.;  Fronto,  of  the   theatre  of  Balbus  at  from 

Princip.  hist.  v.  13.     A  fourth-cen-  11,510  to  30,085,  that  of  the  theatre 

tury  inscription  {Bull.  d.  Commis.  of  Marcellus  as  20,000. 
arch. cotnun.diRoma,\&<)\, 3^2)00x1-  3  Friedlander,    ii.    100;    Haigh, 

tains  a  list  of  small  Roman  tabernarii  457;    Krumbacher,  646 ;  Welcker, 

entitiedtolocumspectaculiselpanem.  Die griechischen  Tragodien  (1S41), 

*  The   holding    capacity   of    the  iii.  1472. 
theatre    of    Pompey    is    variously         *  Juvenal,  i.  I  ;  Pliny,  Epist.  vi. 

B  2 


4  MINSTRELSY 

delight  of  the.  Renaissance  but  it  is  improbable  that,  until 
the  Renaissance,  they  were  ever  dignified  with  representation. 
Roughly  speaking,  for  comedy  and  tragedy  the  Empire  sub- 
stituted farce  and  pantomime. 

Farce,  as  has  been  noticed,  was  the  earliest  traffic  of  the 
Roman  stage.  The  Atellane,  relegated  during  the  brief 
vogue  of  comedy  and  tragedy  to  the  position  of  an  interlude 
or  an  afterpiece,  now  once  more  asserted  its  independence. 
But  already  during  the  Republic  the  Atellane,  with  its  some- 
what conventional  and  limited  methods,  was  beginning  to 
give  way  to  a  more  flexible  and  vital  type  of  farce.  This 
was  none  other  than  the  old  mime  of  Magna  Graecia,  which 
now  entered  on  a  fresh  phase  of  existence  and  overran  both 
West  and  East.  That  it  underwent  considerable  modifi- 
cations, and  probably  absorbed  much  both  of  Atellane  and 
of  Attic  comedy,  may  be  taken  for  granted.  Certainly  it 
extended  its  scope  to  mythological  themes.  But  its  leading 
characteristics  remained  unchanged.  The  ethical  element, 
one  may  fear,  sank  somewhat  into  the  background,  although 
it  was  by  no  means  absent  from  the  work  of  the  better  mime- 
writers,  such  as  Laberius  and  Publilius  Syrus1.  But  that 
the  note  of  shamelessness  was  preserved  there  is  no  doubt 
whatever2.  The  favourite  theme,  which  is  common  indeed 
to  farce  of  all  ages,  was  that  of  conjugal  infidelity3.  Un- 
chaste scenes  were  represented  with  an  astonishing  realism  4. 


15  ;  vii.  17  ;  Tacitus,  de   Oratori-  2  Incerti    (fourth     century)     ad 

bus,  9,  II.  Terentium  (ed.  Giles,  i.  xix)  '  mimos 

The    Scntentiae    of    Publilius  ab  diuturna  imitatione  vilium  rerum 

Syrus    were     collected    from     his  et  levium  personarum.'     Diomedes 

mimes  in  the  first  century  a. D.,  and  (fifth    century),    Ars   Grammatical, 

enlarged  from  other  sources  during  iii.     488     '  mimus      est     sermonis 

the  Middle  Ages  (Teuffel-Schwabe,  cuiuslibet    imitatio   et   motus   sine 

§    212).      Cf.    the    edition    by   W.  reverentia,  vel  factorum  et  dictorum 

Meyer,  1S80.     The  other  fragments  turpium  cum  lascivia  imitatio.' 

of  the  mimographs  are  included  in  3  Ovid,  Tristia,  ii.  497: 

O.  Ribbeck,  Comicorum  Romano-  'quid,  si  scripsissem  mimos  ob- 

rum    Fragmcnta    (3rd    ed.    1898).  scoena  iocantes, 

Philistion   of   Bithynia,   about   the  qui  semper  vetiti  crimen  amoris 

time  of  Tiberius,  gave   the   mime  habent.' 

a  literary  form   once  more  in    his  *  Hist.  Augusta,  Vita  Helioga- 

Ku>nu>Si<n   fiioXoyiical  (J.    Denis,   La  bali,   25  '  in   mimicis  adulteriis  ea 

Com.  grecquc,  ii.  544;  Croiset,  Hist,  quae  solent  simulato  fieri  effici  ad 

de  la  Litt.  grccque,  v.  449).  verum    iussit '  ;    cf.   the  pyrrichae 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  5 

Contrary  to  the  earlier  custom  of  the  classical  stage,  women 
took  part  in  the  performances,  and  at  the  F lor  alia,  loosest 
of  Roman  festivals,  the  spectators  seem  to  have  claimed  it 
as  their  right,  that^  the  vdniac  should  play  naked  \  '  The 
mimics — for  the  same  term  designates  both  piece  and  actor — 
was  just  the  kind  of  entertainer  whom  a  democratic  audience 
loves.  Clad  in  a  parti-coloured  centunculus,  with  no  mask 
to  conceal  the  play  of  facial  gesture,  and  planipes,  with  no 
borrowed  dignity  of  sock  or  buskin,  he  rattled  through  his 
side-splitting  scenes  of  low  life,  and  eked  out  his  text  with 
an  inexhaustible  variety  of  rude  dancing,  buffoonery  and 
horse-play 2.  Originally  the  mimes  seem  to  have  performed 
in  monologues,  and  the  action  of  their  pieces  continued  to 
be  generally  dominated  by  a  single  personage,  the  archi- 
viimus,  who  was  provided  with  certain  stupidi  and  parasiti 
to  act  as  foils  and  butts  for  his  wit.  A  satirical  intention 
was  frequently  present  in  both  mimes  and  Atellanes,  and 
their  outspoken  allusions  are  more  than  once  recorded  to 
have  wrung  the  withers  of  persons  of  importance  and  to  have 
brought  serious  retribution  on  the  actors  themselves.  Cali- 
gula, for  instance,  with  characteristic  brutality,  had  a  ribald 
playwright  burnt  alive  in  the  amphitheatre3. 

The  farce  was  the_^iy^morL_i^f--th^^roj^ta^iat_and  the 
bourgeoisie  of_R_omeI_.  Petronius,  with  all  the  insolence  of 
the  literary  man,  makes  Trimalchio  buy  a  troupe  of  comedians, 
and  insist  on  their  playing  an  Atellane4.     The  golden  and 

described  by  Suetonius,  Nero,  12.  to-be-traced-here,- 

The  Roman  taste  for  bloodshed  was  2  The  'mimus'  type  is  exactly  re-;' 

sometimes  gratified  by  mimes  given  produced  by  more  than  one  popular' 

in  the  amphitheatre,  and  designed  performer  on  the  modern  '  variety  '( 

to    introduce    the   actual  execution  or  '  burlesque '  stage. 

of  a  criminal.     Martial,  de  Specta-  3  Macrobius,  Sat.  ii.  7  ;   Cicero, 

cutis,  7,  mentions  the  worrying  and  ad  Atiicum,\W.  3  ;  Suetonius,  Au- 

crucifixion  of  a  brigand  in  the  mime  gustus,  45, 68  ;  Tiberius,^  ;  Cali- 

Laureolus,  by  order  of  Domitian  :  gula,  27;    Nero,   39;    Galba,   13; 

'nudaCaledoniosicpectoraprae-  Vespasia?i,     19;      Domitian,     10; 

buit  urso  Hist.  Augusta,  Vita  Marc.  Aurel. 

non  falsa  pendens  in  cruce  Lau-  8.    29 ;     Vita    Commodi,   3  ;     Vita 

reolus.'  Maximini,  9. 

1  Martial,   i.   1  ;    Ausonius,  Eel.         *  Petronius,  Satyricon,   liii ;    cf. 

xviii.    25;     Lactantius   (t3oo),    de  Taming  of  tlie  Shrew,   i.    1.   258 

Inst.  div.  i.  20.  10.     Jjiohahiv  the  "Tis  a  very  excellent  piece  of  work, 

influence  of  a  piece  of  folk-ritual  is  madam  lady  ;  would  'twere  done  ! ' 


6  MINSTRELSY 

cultured  classes  preferred  the  pantomimic  dance.  This  arose 
out  of  the  ruins  of  the  literary  drama.  On  the  Roman  stage 
grew  up  a  custom,  unknown  in  Greece,  by  which  the  lyric 
portions  of  the  text  {can  tied)  were  entrusted  to  a  singer  who 
stood  with  the  flute-player  at  the  side  of  the  stage,  while 
the  actor  confined  himself  to  dancing  in  silence  with  appro- 
priate dumb  show.  The  dialogue  (diverbia)  continued  to 
be  spoken  by  the  actors.  The  next  step  was  to  drop  the 
diverbia  altogether ;  and  thus  came  the  pantominms  who 
undertook  to  indicate  the  whole  development  of  a  plot  in 
a  series  of  dramatic  dances,  during  the  course  of  which  he 
often  represented  several  distinct  roles.  Instead  of  the  single 
flute-player  and  singer  a  full  choir  now  supplied  the  musical 
accompaniment,  and  great  poets — Lucan  and  Statius  among 
the  number — did  not  disdain  to  provide  texts  for  the  fabidae 
salticae.  Many  of  the  pantomimi  attained  to  an  extreme 
refinement  in  their  degenerate  and  sensuous  art.  They  were, 
as  Lucian  said,  yeipovcxpoi,  erudite  of  gesture  \  Their  subjects 
were,  for  the  most  part,  mythological  and  erotic,  not  to  say 
lascivious,  in  character2.  Pylades  the  Cilician,  who,  with 
his  great  rival  Bathyllus  the  Alexandrian,  brought  the  dance 
to  its  first  perfection  under  Augustus,  favoured  satyric 
themes ;  but  this  mode  does  not  appear  to  have  endured. 
Practically  the  dancers  were  the  tragedians,  and  the  mimes 
were  the  comedians,  of  the  Empire.  The  old  Etruscan  name 
for  an  actor,  histrio,  came  to  be  almost  synonymous  with 
pantomimus 3.  Rome,  which  could  lash  itself  into  a  fury 
over  the  contests  between  the  Whites  and  Reds  or  the 
Blues  and  Greens  in  the  circus,  was  not  slow  to  take  sides 
upon  the  respective  merits  of  its   scenic  entertainers.     The 

1  Lucian,  de  Saltatione,  69.  origin  of  the  name,  cf.  Livy,  vii.  2 

2  Juvenal,  Sat.  vi.  63  ;  Zosimus  '  ister  Tusco  verbo  ludius  vocaba- 
(450-501  A.  D.),  i.  6  (Corp.  Script,  tur.'  Besides  ludhts,  actor  is  good 
Hist.  Byz.  xx.  12)  rj  re  yap  travro-  Latin.  But  it  is  generally  used  in 
fiifios  opxTja-is  iv  eKcipois  ela-Tjx^l  T0's  some  such  phrase  as  actor  ftrima- 
Xpovois  .  .  .  ttoWcov  airia  yzyovora  rum  personarum,  protagonist,  and 
/le'xpi  ToiiSe  KaKav.  by    itself    often    means    dominus 

3  This  is  not  wholly  so,  at  any  gregis,  manager  of  the  grer  or 
rate  in  Tacitus,  who  seems  to  in-  company.  Mimus  signifies  both 
elude  the  players  both  of  mimes  performer  and  performance,  fianto- 
and  of  Atellanes  amongst  histriones  mimus  the  performer  only.  He  is 
{Ann.  i.  73 ;    iv.    14).      For    the  said  salt  are  fabulas. 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  7 

histrionalis  favor  led  again  and  again  to  brawls  which  set 
the  rulers  of  the  city  wondering  whether  after  all  the  panto- 
mimi  were  worth  while.  Augustus  had  found  it  to  his 
advantage  that  the  spirit  of  partisanship  should  attach  itself 
to  a  Pylades  or  a  Bathyllus  rather  than  to  more  illustrious 
antagonists1.  But  the  personal  instincts  of  Tiberius  were 
not  so  genial  as  those  of  Augustus.  Early  in  his  principate 
he  attempted  to  restrain  the  undignified  court  paid  by 
senators  and  knights  to  popular  dancers,  and  when  this 
measure  failed,  he  expelled  the  histriones  from  Italy2.  The 
example  was  followed  by  more  than  one  of  his  successors, 
but  Rome  clamoured  fiercely  for  its  toys,  and  the  period 
of  exile  was  never  a  long  one  3. 

Both  mimi  and  pantomimi  had  their  vogue  in  private,  at  the 
banquets  and  weddings  of  the  great,  as  well  as  in  public.  The 
class  of  scenici  further  included  a  heterogeneous  variety  of 
lesser  performers.  There  were  the  rhapsodes  who  sung  the 
tragic  cantica,  torn  from  their  context,  upon  the  stage.  There 
were  musicians  and  dancers  of  every  order  and  from  every 
land  4.  There  were  jugglers  {praestigiatores,  acetabuli),  rope- 
walkers  (funambuli),  stilt-walkers  {grallatores),  tumblers 
(cernui,  petauristae,  petaminarii),  buffoons  {sanniones,  scurrae), 
beast-tamers  and  strong  men.  The  pick  of  them  did  their 
'  turns '  in  the  theatre  or  the  amphitheatre  ;  the  more  humble 
were  content  with  modest  audiences  at  street  corners  or  in  the 
vestibule  of  the  circus.  From  Rome  the  entertainers  of 
the  imperial  race  naturally  found  their  way  into  the  theatres 
of  the  provinces.  Tragedy  and  comedy  no  doubt  held  their 
own  longer  in  Greece,  but  the  stage  of  Constantinople  under 
Justinian  does  not  seem  to  have  differed  notably  from  the  stage 
of  Rome  under  Nero.  Marseilles  alone  distinguished  itself  by 
the  honourable  austerity  which  forbade  the  mimi  its  gates 5. 

1  Dion  Cassius,  liv.  17.  Hadriani,  19 ;   Vita  Alex.  Severi, 

2  Tacitus,  Annates,  i.  77;  iv.  14;      34. 

Dion  Cassius,  lvii.  21 ;  Suetonius,  4  The  fiyrricha,   a   Greek    con- 

Tiberius,  37.  certed    dance,    probably    of    folk 

3  Tacitus,  Annates,  xiii.  25  ;  xiv.  origin  (cf.  ch.  ix),  was  often  given  a 
21  ;   Dion  Cassius,  lix.  2  ;  lxi.   8  ;  mythological  argumentum.    It  was 
lxviii.  10;  Suetonius,  Nero,  16,  26  ;  danced  in  the  amphitheatre. 
Titus,    7  ;     Domitian,    7  ;     Pliny,  6  Valerius     Maximus,    ii.    6.     7 
Paneg.  46;    Hist.  Augusta,    Vita  'eadem  civitas    severitatis    custos 


8  MINSTRELSY 

It  must  not  be  supposed  that  the  profession  of  the  scenici 
ever  became  an  honourable  one  in  the  eyes  of  the  Roman  law. 
They  were  for  the  most  part  slaves  or  at  best  freedmen.  They 
were  deliberately  branded  with  infamia  or  incapacity  for  civil 
rights.  This  infamia  was  of  two  kinds,  depending  respectively 
upon  the  action  of  the  censors  as  guardians  of  public  dignity 
and  that  of  the  praetors  as  presidents  in  the  law  courts.  The 
censors  habitually  excluded  actors  from  the  ins  snffragii  and 
the  ius  honorum,  the  rights  of  voting  and  of  holding  sena- 
torial or  equestrian  rank  ;  the  praetors  refused  to  allow  them, 
if  men,  to  appear  as  attorneys,  if  women,  to  appoint  attorneys, 
in  civil  suits  1.  The  legislation  of  Julius  Caesar  and  of  Augustus 
added  some  statutory  disabilities.  The  lex  lulia  municipalis 
forbade  actors  to  hold  municipal  honores  2 :  the  lex  lulia  de 
adnltcriis  set  the  example  of  denying  them  the  right  to  bring 
criminal  actions 3  ;  the  lex  lulia  et  Papia  Poppaca  limited 
their  privileges  when  freed,  and  in  particular  forbade  senators 
or  the  sons  of  senators  to  take  to  wife  women  who  had  been, 
or  whose  parents  had  been,  on  the  stage  4.  On  the  other  hand 
Augustus  confined  the  ius  virgarum,  which  the  praetors  had 
formerly  had  over  scenici,  to  the  actual  place  and  time  of 
performances  5 ;  and  so  far  as  the  censorian  infamia  was  con- 
cerned, the  whole  tendency  of  the  late  Republic  and  early 
Empire  was  to  relax  its  application  to  actors.  It  came  to  be 
possible  for  senators  and  knights  to  appear  on  the  stage  with- 
out losing  caste.     It  was  a  grievous  insult  when  Julius  Caesar 

acerrima    est :    nullum    aditum    in  further  exemption  for  persons  ap- 

scenam  mimis  dando,  quorum  argu-  pearing  in  their  minority  (C.I.  C. 

menta  maiore  in  parte  stuprorum  Cod.  lust.  ii.  II.  21).    The  censors, 

continent  actus  ;  ne  talia  spectandi  on    the    other    hand,    spared    the 

consuetudo   etiam    imitandi   licen-  Atellani,  whose  performances  had 

tiam  sumat.'  a   traditional   connexion   with    re- 

1  A.  H.  J.    Greenidge,  Infamia  ligious  rites. 

(passim)  ;  Bouch^-Leclercq,  Man-  2  C.I.L.i.  122. 

uel  des  Institutions  romaines,  352,  3  C.I.  C. Digest,  xlviii.  5.  25.      A 

449 ;  Edictum  praetoris  in  C.  I.  C.  husband   may    kill   an   actor   with 

Digest,  iii.  2.  1  '  infamia  notatur  qui  whom  his  wife  is  guilty. 

.  .  .  artis  ludicrae  pronuntiandive  4  Ibid,  xxiii.  2.  42,  44  ;  xxxviii.  1. 

causa  in  scaenam  prodierit.'     The  37  ;  Ulpian,  Fragm.  xiii. 

jurists   limited   the    application   of  6  Tacitus,   Annates,   i.   yy.      An 

the  rule  to  professional  actors.   Thy-  attempt  to  restore   the   old   usage 

melici,    or     orchestral     musicians,  under  Tiberius  was  unsuccessful, 
were  exempt.     Diocletian  made  a 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  9 

compelled  the  mimograph  Laberius  to  appear  in  one  of  his 
own  pieces.  But  after  all  Caesar  restored  Laberius  to  his 
rank  of  eques,  a  dignity  which  at  a  still  earlier  date  Sulla  had 
bestowed  on  Roscius l.  Later  the  restriction  broke  down 
altogether,  although  not  without  an  occasional  reforming  effort 
to  restore  it2.  Nero  himself  was  not  ashamed  to  take  the 
boards  as  a  singer  of  cantica 3.  And  even  an  i?ifamis,  if  he 
were  the  boon  companion  of  a  prince,  might  be  appointed  to 
a  post  directly  depending  on  the  imperial  dignity.  Thus 
Caracalla  sent  a  pantomimus  to  hold  a  military  command  on 
the  frontier,  and  Heliogabalus  made  another  praefectus  urbi  in 
Rome  itself4.  Under  Constantine  a  reaction  set  in,  and  a  new 
decree  formally  excluded  scenici  from  all  dignitates 5.  The 
severe  class  legislation  received  only  reluctant  and  piecemeal 
modification,  and  the  praetorian  infamia  outlived  the  Empire 
itself,  and  left  its  mark  upon  Carolingian  jurisprudence6. 

The  relaxation  of  the  old  Roman  austerity  implied  in  the 
popularity  of  the  viimi  and  histriones  did  not  pass  uncensured 
by  even  the  pagan  moralists  of  the  Empire.  The  stage  has 
a  share  in  the  denunciations  of  Tacitus  and  Juvenal,  both  of 
whom  lament  that  princes  and  patricians  should  condescend 
to  practise  arts  once  relegated  to  the  infames.  Martial's 
hypocrite  rails  at  the  times  and  the  theatres.  Three  centuries 
later  the  soldierly  Ammianus  Marcellinus  finds  in  the 
gyrations .  of  the  dancing-girls,  three  thousand  of  whom  were 
allowed  to  remain  in  Rome  when  it  was  starving,  a  blot 
upon  the  fame  of  the  state  ;  and  Macrobius  contrasts  the 
sober  evenings  of  Praetextatus  and  his  friends  with  revels 
dependent  for  their  mirth  on  the  song  and  wanton  motions  of 

1  Caesar  was  tolerably  magnani-      Domitian,  8. 

mous,  for    Laberius    had    already  *  Suetonius,  Nero,  21;    Tacitus, 

taken  his   revenge  in  a  scurrilous  Ann.  xiv.  14  ;    Juvenal,  viii.  198  ; 

prologue.  It  had  its  touch  of  pathos,  Pseudo-Lucian,  Nero,  9. 

too  :  4  Dion  Cassius,  lxxvii.  21  ;  Hist. 

'eques   Romanus    lare    egressus  Augusta,     Vita    Heliogabali,     12. 

meo  Yet  in  the  time  of  Severus  a  soldier 

domum  revertar  mimus.'  going  on   the  stage  was  liable  to 

2  CicerO,  ad  Fam.  x.  32  ;    Dion  death    (C.  /.  C.   Digest,   xlviii.    19. 
Cassius,  xlviii.  33  ;  liii.  31  ;  liv.  2;  14). 

lvi.  47  ;    lvii.  14  ;    lix.   10;    lxi.  9;  5  C.  I.  C.  Cod.  lust.  xii.  1.  2. 

lxv.  6;  Tacitus,  Ann.  xiv.  20;   Hist.         6  Cf.  p.  38. 
ii.  62  ;    Suetonius,  Augustus,  45  ; 


10  MINSTRELSY 

the  psaltria  or  the  jests  of  sabulo  and  planipes x.  Policy 
compelled  the  emperors  to  encourage  spectacula,  but  even  they 
were  not  always  blind  to  the  ethical  questions  involved. 
Tiberius  based  his  expulsion  of  the  kistriones,  at  least  in  part, 
on  moral  grounds.  Marcus  Aurelius,  with  a  philosophic 
regret  that  the  high  lessons  of  comedy  had  sunk  to  mere 
mimic  dexterity,  sat  publicly  in  his  box  and  averted  his  eyes 
to  a  state-paper  or  a  book2.  Julian,  weaned  by  his  tutor 
Mardonius  from  a  boyish  love  of  the  stage,  issued  strict 
injunctions  to  the  priests  of  the  Sun  to  avoid  a  theatre  which 
he  despaired  of  reforming  3.  Christian  teachers,  unconcerned 
with  the  interests  of  a  dynasty,  and  claiming  to  represent 
a  higher  morality  than  that  either  of  Marcus  Aurelius  or  of 
Julian,  naturally  took  even  stronger  ground.  Moreover,  they 
had  their  special  reasons  for  hostility  to  the  stage.  That  the 
actors  should  mock  at  the  pagan  religion,  with  whose  ludi  their 
own  performances  were  intimately  connected,  made  a  good 
dialectical  point.  But  the  connexion  itself  was  unpardonable, 
and  still  more  so  the  part  taken  by  the  mimes  during  the  war 
of  creeds,  in  parodying  and  holding  up  to  ridicule  the  most 
sacred  symbols  and  mysteries  of  the  church.  This  feeling  is 
reflected  in  the  legends  of  St.  Genesius,  St.  Pelagia  and  other 
holy  folk,  who  are  represented  as  turning  from  the  scenic 
profession  to  embrace  Christianity,  the  conversion  in  some 
cases  taking  place  on  the  very  boards  of  the  theatre  itself4. 

1  Tacitus,  Ann.  xiv.  20 ;  Juvenal,  He  also  thinks  that  the  moral  lay- 
vi.  60  ;  viii.  183  ;  Martial,  ix.  28.  9  ;  man  should  avoid  the  theatre 
Ammianus  Marcellinus,  xiv.  6.  18  ;      (Misopogon,  p.  343  c). 

xxviii.  4.  32  ;  Macrobius,  ii.  1.  5,  9.  4  On  the  critical  problem  offered 

2  M.  Aurelius,  Comm.  xi.  6 ;  Hist,  by  such  vitae  cf.  Prof.  Bury  in 
Augusta,  Vita  M.  Aurel.  15.  This  Gibbon,  i.  1.  B.  von  der  Lage, 
refers  directly  to  the  circus.  Studien      zur      Genesius  -  legende 

3  Gibbon,  ii.  447;  Schaff,  v.  49;  (1898),  attempts  to  show  that  the 
Dill,  34,  100 ;  P.  Allard,  Julien  legends  of  St.  Genesius  {Acta  SS. 
VApostat,  i.  272;  Alice  Gardner,  Aug.  v.  122),  St.  Gelasius  {Acta  SS. 
Julian  the  Apostate,20i ;  G.H.Ren-  Fed.  hi.  680),  St.  Ardalio  {Acta  SS. 
dall,  The  Emperor  Julian  (1879),  Apr.  ii.  213),  St.  Porphyrius  {Acta 
106.  The  most  interesting  passage  SS.  Sept.  v.  27)j  and  another  St. 
is  a  fragmentary  '  pastoral  letter  '  Porphyrius  {Acta  SS.  Nov.  ii.  230) 
to  a  priest  (ed.  Hertlein,  Fragm.  are  all  variants  of  a  Greek  story 
Ep.  p.  304  B  ;  cf.  Ep.  49,  p.  430  B ) ;  originally  told  of  an  anonymous 
Julian  requires  the  priests  to  ab-  mimus.  The  Passio  of  St.  Genesius 
stain  even  from  reading  the  Old  represents  him  as  a  magister  mimi- 
Comedy  {Fragm.  Ep.  p.  300  D).  themelae  artis,  converted  while  he 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES 


11 


So  far  as  the  direct  attack  upon  the  stage  is  concerned,  the 
key-note  of  patristic  eloquence  is  struck  in  the  characteristic 
and  uncompromising  treatise  De  Spectaculis  of  Tertullian. 
Here  theatre,  circus,  and  amphitheatre  are  joined  in  a  three- 
fold condemnation.  Tertullian  holds  that  the  Christian  has 
explicitly  forsworn  spectacula,  when  he  renounced  the  devil 
and  all  his  works  and  vanities  at  baptism.  What  are  these 
but  idolatry,  and  where  is  idolatry,  if  not  in  the  spectacula, 
which  not  only  minister  to  lust,  but  take  place  at  the  festivals 
and  in  the  holy  places  of  Venus  and  Bacchus  ?  The  story  is 
told  of  the  demon  who  entered  a  woman  in  the  theatre  and 
excused  himself  at  exorcism,  because  he  had  found  her  in  his 
own  demesne.  A  fervid  exhortation  follows.  To  worldly 
pleasures  Christians  have  no  claim.  If  they  need  spectacula 
they  can  find  them  in  the  exercises  of  their  Church.  Here  are 
nobler  poetry,  sweeter  voices,  maxims  more  sage,  melodies 
more  dulcet,  than  any  comedy  can  boast,  and  withal,  here  is 
truth  instead  of  fiction.  Moreover,  for  Christians  is  reserved 
the  last  great  spectaculum  of  all.  '  Then,'  says  Tertullian, 
'  will  be  the  time  to  listen  to  the  tragedians,  whose  lamenta- 
tions will  be  more  poignant  for  their  proper  pain.  Then  will 
the  comedians  turn  and  twist,  rendered  nimbler  than  ever  by 
the  sting  of  the  fire  that  is  not  quenched  V  With  Tertullian 
asceticism  is  always  a  passion,  but  the  vivid  African  rhetoric 
is  no  unfair  sample  of  a  catena  of  outspoken  comment  which 
extends  across  the  third  century  from  Tatian  to  Lactantius  2. 


was  mimicking  a  baptism  before 
Diocletian  and  martyred.  It  pro- 
fesses to  give  part  of  the  dialogue  of 
the  mime.  The  legends  of  St.  Phile- 
mon (Menologium  Basilii,  ii.  59 ; 
cf.  Acta  SS.  Mar.  i.  751)  and  St. 
Pelagia  or  Margarita  {Acta  SS.  Oct. 
iv.  248)  appear  to  be  distinct.  Pal- 
ladius,  Vita  Chrysostotni,  8,  records 
how  the  stage  of  Antioch  in  the 
fifth  century  rang  with  the  scandals 
caused  by  the  patriarch  Severus 
and  other  Monophysite  heretics. 

1  Tertullian,  De  Sped.,  especially 
cc.  4,  26,  30.  SchafT,  iv.  833,  dates 
the  treatise  t2oo.  An  earlier 
Greek  writing  by  Tertullian  on  the 
same  subject  is  lost ;   cf.  also  his 


Apologeticus,  1 5  {P.  L.  i.  357).  The 
information  as  to  the  contemporary 
stage  scattered  through  Tertullian's 
works  is  collected  by  E.  Noldechen, 
Tertullian  und  das  Theater  (Z.  /. 
Kirchengeschichte  (1894),  xv.  161). 
An  anonymous  De  Spectaculis,  for- 
merly ascribed  to  St.  Cyprian, 
follows  on  Tertullian's  lines  (P.  L. 
iv.  779,  transl.  in  Ante-Nicene 
Christian  Libr.  xiii.  221). 

2  Tatian,  ad  Graecos,  22  (P.  G. 
vi.  856)  ;  Minucius  Felix,  Octavius, 
27  (P.  L.  iii.  352) ;  Cyprian,  Epist. 
i.  8  (P.  L.  iv.  207)  ;  Lactantius,  de 
Inst.  div.  vi.  20  {P.  L.  vi.  710), '  quid 
de  mimis  loquar,  corruptelarum 
praeferentibus  disciplinary  qui  do- 


12 


MINSTRELSY 


The  judgement  of  the  Fathers  finds  more  cautious  expression 
in  the  disciplinary  regulations  of  the  Church.  An  early  formal 
condemnation  of  actors  is  included  in  the  so-called  Canons  of 
Hippolytus  \  and  the  relations  of  converts  to  the  stage  were 
discussed  during  the  fourth  century  by  the  councils  of  Elvira 
(306)  and  of  Aries  (314)  and  by  the  third  and  fourth  councils 
of  Carthage  (397-398) 2.  It  was  hardly  possible  for  practical 
legislators  to  take  the  extreme  step  of  forbidding  Christian 
laymen  to  enter  the  theatre  at  all.  No  doubt  that  would  be  the 
counsel  of  perfection,  but  in  dealing  with  a  deep-seated  popular 
instinct  something  of  a  compromise  was  necessary 3.  An 
absolute  prohibition  was  only  established  for  the  clergy:  so 
far  as  the  laity  were  concerned,  it  was  limited  to  Sundays  and 
ecclesiastical  festivals,  and  on  those  days  it  was  enforced  by 
a  threat  of  excommunication  4.  No  Christian,  however,  might 
be  a  scenicus  or  a  scenica,  or  might  marry  one  ;  and  if  a  member 
of  the  unhallowed  profession  sought  to  be  baptized,  the 
preliminary  of  abandoning  his  calling  was  essential5. 

3  The  strongest  pronouncement 
is  that  of  Augustine  and  others  in 
3  Cone.  Carth.  c.  1 1  '  ut  filii  epi- 
scoporum  vel  clericorum  spectacula 
saecularia  non  exhibeant,  sed  non 
spectent,  quandoquidem  ab  specta- 
culo  et  omnes  laici  prohibeantur. 
Semper  enim  Christianis  omnibus 
hoc  interdictum  est,  ut  ubi  blasphe- 
mi  sunt,  non  accedant.' 

4  4  Cone.  Carth.  c.  88  '  Qui  die 
solenni,  praetermisso  solenni  eccle- 
siae  conventu,  ad  spectacula  vadit, 
excommunicetur.' 

5  D.  C.A.  s.vv.  Actor,  Theatre; 
Bingham,  vi.  212,  373,  439;  Alt, 
310;  Prynne,  556.  Some,  how- 
ever, of  the  pronouncements  of  the 
fathers  came  to  have  equal  force 
with  the  decrees  of  councils  in 
canon  law.  The  Code  of  Gratian 
(til 39),  besides  3  Cone.  Carth. 
c.  35  '  scenicis  atque  ystrionibus, 
ceterisque  huiusmodi  personis,  vel 
apostaticis  conversis,  vel  reversis 
ad  Deum,  gratia  vel  reconcilia- 
tio  non  negetur '  (C.  I.  Can.  iii. 
2.  96)  and  7  Cone.  Carth.  (419)  c.  2 
(Mansi,  iv. 437)  'omnes  etiam  infa- 
miae  maculis  aspersi,  id  est  histrio- 


cent  adulteria,  dum  fingunt,  et 
simulatis  erudiunt  ad  vera  ? '  ;  cf. 
Du  Menl,  Or.  Lat.  6  ;  Schaff,  iii. 
339.  A  remarkable  collection  of 
all  conceivable  authorities  against 
the  stage  is  given  by  Prynne,  566, 
685,  &c. 

1  Canones  Hippolyti,  67  (Du- 
chesne, 509)  'Quicumque  fit  dea- 
rptKos  vel  gladiator  et  qui  currit  vel 
docet  voluptates  vel  [illegible]  vel 
[illegible]  vel  Kwrjyos  vel  lmro8p6- 
nos  [?],  vel  qui  cum  bestiis  pugnat 
vel  idolorum  sacerdos,  hi  omnes 
non  admittuntur  ad  sermones 
sacros  nisi  prius  ab  illis  immundis 
operibus  purgentur.'  This  is  from 
an  Arabic  translation  of  a  lost 
Greek  original.  M.  Duchesne  says 
'  ce  recueil  de  prescriptions  litur- 
giques  et  disciplinaires  est  surement 
antdrieur  au  ive  siecle,  et  rien  ne 
s'oppose  a  ce  qu'il  remonte  a  la 
date  indiquee  par  le  nom  d'Hippo- 
lyte'  [1198-236]. 

2  Cone.  1Mb.  cc.  62,  67  (Mansi, 
ii.  16)  ;  Cone.  Arelat.  c.  5  (Mansi, 
ii.  471)  ;  3  Cone.  Carth.  cc.  11,  35 
(Mansi,  iii.  882,  885);  4  Cone. 
Carth.  cc.  86,  88  (Mansi,  iii.  958). 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES 


13 


It  is  curious  to  notice  that  a  certain  sympathy  with  the 
stage  seems  to  have  been  characteristic  of  one  of  the  great 
heresiarchs.  This  was  none  other  than  Arius,  who  is  said  to 
have  had  designs  of  setting  up  a  Christian  theatre  in  rivalry 
to  those  of  paganism,  and  his  strange  work,  the  Thaleia,  may 
perhaps  have  been  intended  to  further  the  scheme.  At  any 
rate  an  orthodox  controversialist  takes  occasion  to  brand  his 
Arian  opponents  and  their  works  as  '  thymelic '  or  'stagy'1. 
But  it  would  probably  be  dangerous  to  lay  undue  stress  upon 
what,  after  all,  is  as  likely  as  not  to  be  merely  a  dialectical 
metaphor. 

After  the  edict  of  Milan  (313),  and  still  more  after  the  end 
of  the  pagan  reaction  with  the  death  of  Julian  (363),  Christian 
influences  began  to  make  themselves  felt  in  the  civil  legislation 
of  the  Empire.  But  if  the  councils  themselves  were  chary  of 
utterly  forbidding  the  theatre,  a  stronger  line  was  not  likely 
to  be  taken  in  rescripts  from  Constantinople  or  Ravenna. 
The  emperors  were,  indeed,  in  a  difficult  position.  They 
stood  between  bishops  pleading  for  decency  and  humanity 
and  populaces  now  traditionally  entitled  to  their  pattern  ct 
spcctacula.  The  theatrical  legislation  preserved  in  the  Code  of 
Theodosius  is  not  without  traces  of  this  embarrassment2.     It 


nes  . . .  abaccusationeprohibentur' 
(C.  I.  Can.  ii.  4.  I.  1),  includes  two 
patristic  citations.  One  is  Cyprian, 
Ep.  lxi.  {P.  L.  iv.  362),  which  is  '  de 
ystrione  et  mago  illo,  qui  apud  vos 
constitutus  adhuc  in  suae  artis 
dedecore  perseverat,'  and  forbids 
'  sacra  communio  cum  ceteris 
Christianis  dari '  (C.  I.  Can.  iii.  2. 
95);  the  other  Augustine,  Tract. 
C.  ad  c.  16  Iohannis  (P.  L.  xxxv. 
1891)  'donare  res  suas  histrionibus 
vitium  est  immane,  non  virtus '  (C. 
I.  Can.  i.  86.  J).  Gratian  adds  Isi- 
dorus  Hispalensis,  de  Eccl.  Off-  ii.  2 
(P.  L.  lxxxiii.  778)  '  his  igitur  lege 
Patrum  cavetur,  ut  a  vulgari  vita 
seclusi  a  mundi  voluptatibus  sese 
abstineant  ;  non  spectaculis,  non 
pompis    intersint'    (C.   /.    Can.    i. 

23-  3)- 

1  Sathas,   7  ;    Krumbacher,  644. 

Anastasius  Sinaita  (bp.  of  An- 
tioch,  564)  in  his  tract,  Adversus 


Monophvsitas  ac  Monothelitas 
(Mai,  Coll.  Nov.  Script.  Vet.  vii. 
202),  speaks  of  the  avyypafxp.ara 
of  the  Arians  as  dvp.€\i>cas  fii- 
fihovs,  and  calls  the  Arian  Euno- 

mius  TrpcDToaTaTTjs  TJ]S  'Apeiov  6vfj.e- 
Xik^?  opxTjo-rpas.  I  doubt  if  these 
phrases  should  be  taken  too  liter- 
ally ;  possibly  they  are  not  more 
than  a  criticism  of  the  buffoonery 
and  levity  which  the  fragments  of 
the  edXtta  display.  Krumbacher 
mentions  an  orthodox  xAvTi6d\aa 
of  which  no  more  seems  to  be 
known. 

2  Alt,  310  ;  Bingham,  vi.  273  ; 
S chaff,  v.  106,  125;  Haigh,  460; 
Dill,  56;  P.Allard,/»/zV?«  FApostat. 
i.  230.  The  Codex  Theodosianus, 
drawn  up  and  accepted  for  both 
empires  t435,  contains  imperial 
edicts  from  the  time  of  Constantine 
onwards. 


14  MINSTRELSY 

is  rather  an  interesting  study.  The  views  of  the  Church  were 
met  upon  two  points.  One  series  of  rescripts  forbade  perform- 
ances on  Sundays  or  during  the  more  sacred  periods  of  the 
Christian  calendar x :  another  relaxed  in  favour  of  Christians 
the  strict  caste  laws  which  sternly  forbade  actresses  or  their 
daughters  to  quit  the  unhappy  profession  in  which  they  were 
born 2.  Moreover,  certain  sumptuary  regulations  were  passed, 
which  must  have  proved  a  severe  restriction  on  the  popularity 
as  well  as  the  liberty  of  actors.  They  were  forbidden  to  wear 
gold  or  rich  fabrics,  or  to  ape  the  dress  of  nuns.  They  must 
avoid  the  company  of  Christian  women  and  i>oys.  They  must 
not  come  into  the  public  places  or  walk  the  streets  attended 
by  slaves  with  folding  chairs  3.  Some  of  the  rescripts  contain 
phrases  pointed  with  the  bitterest  contempt  and  detestation  of 
their  victims 4.  Theodosius  will  not  have  the  portraits  of 
scenici  polluting  the  neighbourhood  of  his  own  imagines  5.  It 
is  made  very  clear  that  the  old  court  favourites  are  now  to 
be  merely  tolerated.  But  they  are  to  be  tolerated.  The  idea 
\  of  suppressing  them  is  never  entertained.  On  the  contrary 
'the  provision  of  spectacula  and  of  performers  for  them 
remains  one  of  the  preoccupations  of  the  government 6.  The 
praetor  is  expected  to  be  lavish  on  this  item  of  his  budget 7, 

1  Spectaatla  are  forbidden  on  the  concessions,  in  the  interest  of 
Sunday,  unless  it  is  the  emperor's  the  public  voluptates,  but  this  may 
birthday,  by  C.  Th.  xv.  5.  2  (386),  have  been  only  a  temporary  or  local 
which  also   forbids  judges  to  rise  measure. 

for  them,  except  on  special  occa-         3  C.  Th.  xv.  7. 11  (393) ;  xv.  7. 12 

sions,  and  C.   Th.  ii.  8.  23  (399).  (394);  xv.  13.  I  (396). 
The  exception  is  removed  by  C.  Th.  4  C.  Th.  iv.  6.  3  (336)  'scenicae 

ii.  8;  25  (409)  and  C.  lust.  iii.  12.  9  ...   quarum    venenis    inficiuntur 

(469).     The   Christian   feasts   and  animi  perditorum';  xv.  7.  8  (381), 

fasts,    Christmas,     Epiphany,    the  of  the  relapsing  scenica,  '  perma- 

first    week   in   Lent,    Passion   and  neat  donee  anus  ridicula,  senectute 

Easter  weeks  are  added  by  C.  Th.  deformis,  nee  tunc  quidem  absolu- 

ii.  8.  23  (400)  and  C.  Th.  xv.  5.  5  tione    potiatur,    cum    aliud    quam 

(425).     According   to   some   MSS.  casta  esse  non  possit.' 
this  was  done  by  C.  Th.  ii.  8.  19  5  C.  Th.  xv.  7.  12  (394). 

(389),  but  the  events  of  399  recorded  6  C.  Th.  xv.  6.  2  (399  J  is  explicit, 

below  seem  to  show  that  400  is  the  '  ludicras  artes  concedimus  agitari, 

right  date.  ne    ex    nimia    harum    restrictione 

2  C.  Th.  xv.  7.  I,  2  (371)  ;  xv.  7.  tristitia  generetur.' 
4  (380);  xv.  7.  9  (381).  Historians  7  C.  Th.  vi.  4.  2  (327)  ;  vi.  4.  4 
have  seen  in  some  of  these  rescripts  (339) ;  vi.  4.  29  (396) ;  vi.  4.  32  (397). 
which  are  dated  from  Milan  the  It  appears  from  the  decree  of  396 
influence  of  St.  Ambrose.  C.  Th.  that  the 'theatralisdispensio' of  the 
xv.  7.  13  (414)  seems  to  withdraw  praetors  had  been  diverted  to  the 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  15 

and  special  municipal  officers,  the  tribuni  voluptatutn,  are 
appointed  to  superintend  the  arrangements  1.  Private  indi- 
viduals and  rival  cities  must  not  deport  actors,  or  withdraw 
them  from  the  public  service  2.  The  bonds  of  caste,  except 
for  the  few  freed  by  their  faith,  are  drawn  as  tight  as  ever 3, 
and  when  pagan  worship  ceases  the  shrines  are  preserved 
from  demolition  for  the  sake  of  the  theatres  built  therein  4. 

The  love  of  even  professing  Christians  for  spectacula  proved 
hard  to  combat.  There  are  no  documents  which  throw  more 
light  on  the  society  of  the  Eastern  Empire  at  the  close  of  the 
fourth  century  than  the  works  of  St.  Chrysostom ;  and  to 
St.  Chrysostom,  both  as  a  priest  at  Antioch  before  397  and  as 
patriarch  of  Constantinople  after  that  year,  the  stage  is  as 
present  a  danger  as  it  was  to  Tertullian  two  centuries  earlier  6. 
A  sermon  preached  on  Easter-day,  399,  is  good  evidence  of 
this.  St.  Chrysostom  had  been  attacking  the  stage  for 
a  whole  year,  and  his  exhortations  had  just  come  to  nought. 
Early  in  Holy  Week  there  was  a  great  storm,  and  the  people 
joined  the  rogatory  processions.  But  it  was  a  week  of  ludi. 
On  Good  Friday  the  circus,  and  on  Holy  Saturday  the  theatre, 
were  thronged  and  the  churches  were  empty.  The  Easter 
sermon  was  an  impassioned  harangue,  in  which  the  preacher 
dwelt  once  more  on  the  inevitable  corruption  bound  up  with 
things  theatrical,  and  ended  with  a  threat  to  enforce  the  sen- 
tence of  excommunication,  prescribed  only  a  few  months  before 
by  the  council  of  Carthage,  upon  whoever  should  again  ven- 
ture to  defy  the  Church's  law  in  like  fashion  on  Sunday  or 
holy  day6.     Perhaps  one  may  trace  the  controversy  which 

building  of  an  aqueduct ;  they  are  sacrifice  or  superstition. 

now  to  give  'scenicas  voluptates  '  5  A.  Puech,  St.  Jean  Chrysostome 

again.      Symmachus,    Ep.   vi.  42,  et  les  Mceurs  de  son  Temps  (1891), 

describes  his  difficulties  in  getting  266,  has  an  interesting  chapter  on  the 

scenici  for  his   son's    praetorship,  spectacula.     He  refers  to  Horn,  in 

which   cost   him   ,£80,000.      They  Matt.  6,  7,  37,  48  ;  Horn,  in  Ioann. 

were  lost  at  sea  ;  cf.  Dill,  151.  18 ;  Horn,  in  Ep.  I   ad  Thess.  5  ; 

1  See  Appendix  A.  Horn,  de  Ddv.  et  Saul,  3  ;  Horn,  in 

2  C.  Th.  xv.  7.  5  (380) ;    xv.  7.  10  Prise.  etAguil.i,8cc.    Most  of  these 
(385)  ;  C.  Just.  xi.  41.  5  (409).  works  belong  to  the  Antioch  period  ; 

3  C.  Th.  xv.  7.  8  (381) ;  xiv.  7.  3  cf.  also  Allard,  i.  229.     In  de  Sacer- 
(412).  dotio  I,  Chrysostom,  like  Augustine, 

4  C.   Th.  xvi.   10.  3    (346).     But  records  his  own  delight  in  the  stage 
C.    Th.   xvi.    10.    17    (399)   forbids  as  a  young  man. 

'  voluptates  '  to  be  connected  with         6  P.  G.  lvi.  263. 


16  MINSTRELSY 

St.  Chrysostom's  deliverance  must  have  awakened,  on  the  one 
hand  in  the  rescript  of  the  autumn  of  399  pointedly  laying 
down  that  the  ludicrae  artes  must  be  maintained,  on  the.  other 
in  the  prohibition  of  the  following  year  against  performances 
in  Holy  week,  and  similar  solemn  tides. 

More  than  a  century  after  the  exile  and  death  of 
St.  Chrysostom  the  theatre  was  still  receiving  state  recog- 
nition at  Constantinople.  A  regulation  of  Justinian  as  to 
the  ludi  to  be  given  by  newly  elected  consuls  specified  a  per- 
formance on  the  stage  ominously  designated  as  the  'Harlots  '*. 
By  this  date  the  status  of  the  theatrical  profession  had  at  last 
undergone  further  and  noticeable  modification.  The  ancient 
Roman  prohibition  against  the  marriage  of  men  of  noble  birth 
with  scenicae  or  other  infames  or  the  daughters  of  such,  had 
been  re-enacted  under  Constantine.  A  partial  repeal  in  454 
had  not  extended  to  the  scenicae  2.  During  the  first  half  of 
the  sixth  century,  however,  a  series  of  decrees  removed  their 
disability  on  condition  of  their  quitting  the  stage,  and  further 
made  it  an  offence  to  compel  slaves  or  freed  women  to  per- 
form against  their  will  3.  '  In  these  humane  relaxations  of  the 
ricid  laws  of  theatrical  caste  has  often  been  traced  the  hand  of 
the  empress  Theodora,  who,  according  to  the  contemporary 
gossip  of  Procopius,  was  herself,  before  her  conversion,  one  of 
the  most  shameless  of  mimes.  But  it  must  be  noted  that  the 
most  important  of  the  decrees  in  question  preceded  the  acces- 
sion of  Justinian,  although  it  may  possibly  have  been  intended 
to  facilitate  his  own  marriage  4.     The  history  of  the  stage  in 

1  C.  I.  C.  Nov.  lust.  cv.  I  (536)  sureties  of  actresses  who  hinder 
1  faciet  processum  qui  ad  theatrum  them  from  conversion  and  quitting 
ducit,  quern  pornas  vocant,  ubi  in  the  stage.  For  similar  legislation 
scena  ridiculorum  est  locus  tragoe-  cf.  Nov.  li  ;  Ixxxix.  15;  cxvii.  4. 
dis  et  thymelicis  choris '  ;  cf.  Chori-  By  Nov.  cxvii.  8.  6  a  man  is  per- 
cius,  Apology  for  Mimes,  ed.  Ch.  mitted  to  turn  his  wife  out  of  doors 
Graux,  in  R.  d.  PJiilologie,  i.  209  ;  and  afterwards  repudiate  her,  if  she 
Krumbacher,  646.  goes  to  theatre,  circus,  or  amphi- 

2  C.  Th.  iv.  6.  3  (336) ;  C.  lust,  theatre  without  his  knowledge  or 
v.  5.  7  (454).  against  his  will. 

s  C.  lust.  v.  4.  23  (520-3)  allows  4  Gibbon,    iv.    212,     516    (with 

the  marriage   on   condition  of  an  Prof.  Bury's  additions) ;  C.  E.  Mal- 

imperial   rescript  and  a  dotale  ittg-  let  in  E.  H.  Review,  ii.  1  ;  A.  Debi- 

strumentu??i.     C.  lust.  i.  4.  33  (534)  dour,  L' Tmperatrice  Theodora,  59. 

waives   the   rescript.     It  also   1m-  Neither  Prof.  Bury  nor  the  editor 

poses  penalties  on  Jideiussores  or  of  the   C.  I.  C.  accepts  M.   Debi- 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  17 

the  East  cannot  be  traced  much  further  with  any  certainty. 
The  canons  of  the  Quinisextine  council,  which  met  in  the 
Trullan  chamber  to  codify  ecclesiastical  discipline  in  692, 
appear  to  contemplate  the  possibility  of  performances  still 
being  given1.  A  modern  Greek  scholar,  M.Sathas,  has  made 
an  ingenious  attempt  to  establish  the  existence  of  a  Byzantine 
theatrical  tradition  right  through  the  Middle  Ages ;  but 
Dr.  Krumbacher,  the  most  learned  historian  of  Byzantine 
literature,  is  against  him,  and  holds  that,  so  far  as  our  know- 
ledge goes,  the  theatre  must  be  considered  to  have  perished 
during  the  stress  of  the  Saracen  invasions  which,  in  the 
seventh  and  eighth  centuries,  devastated  the  East  2. 

The  ending  of  the  theatre  in  the  West  was  in  very  similar 
fashion.  Chrysostom's  great  Latin  contemporaries,  Augustine 
and  Jerome,  are  at  one  with  him  and  with  each  other  in  their 
condemnation  of  the  evils  of  the  public  stage  as  they  knew  it3. 
Their  divergent  attitude  on  a  minor  point  may  perhaps  be 
explained  by  a  difference  of  temperament.  The  fifth  century 
saw  a  marked  revival  of  literary  interests  from  which  even 
dignitaries  of  the  Church  did  not  hold  themselves  wholly  aloof. 
Ausonius  urged  his  grandson  to  the  study  of  Menander. 
Sidonius,  a  bishop  and  no  undevout  one,  read  both  Menander 
and  Terence  with  his  son  4.  With  this  movement  Augustine 
had  some  sympathy.  In  a  well-known  passage  of  the  Con- 
fessions he  records  the  powerful  influence  exercised  by  tragedy, 

dour's  dating  of  C.  List.  v.  4.  23  pagan  religious  festivals  of  a  semi- 
under  Justinian  in  534.  theatrical  character  ;  cf.  ch.  xiv. 
1  Mansi,  xi.  943.  Canon  3  ex-  C.  66  forbids  the  circus  or  any  Se- 
cludes one  who  has  married  a  fxuSrjs  dea  in  Easter  week. 
oKTjviKT)  from  orders.  C.  24  forbids  2  Sathas,  passim  ;  Krumbacher, 
priests   and   monks    Ov/x^ikcov  nai-  644. 

ywo)!/  di-f^irAii,  and  confirms  a  de-  3  Jerome,   in  Ezechiel   (410-15) 

cree    of   the   council    of   Laodicea  'a.  spectaculis  removeamus  oculos 

(cf.  p.  24,  n.  4)  obliging  them,  if  arenae    circi   theatri '   (P.  L.   xxv. 

present  at  a  wedding,  to  leave  the  1S9)  ;  Augustine,  de  Fide  et  Sym- 

room  before  to.  naiyvia  are  intro-  bolo  (393)  '  in  theatris  labes  morum, 

duced.     C.  51  condemns,  both  for  discere    turpia,    audire    inhonesta, 

clergy    and    laity,  rols  Xcyopivovs  videre  perniciosa '  (P.  L.  xl.  639 ; 

fiifiovs  Kal  ra  tovtwv  Gtarpa  and  ras  cf.  the  sermon  quoted  in  Appendix 

eVi  (tktjvuv  opxrjvtis.    For  clergy  the  N,  N°.  x. 

penalty  is  degradation,  for  laity  ex-  *  Ausonius,  Idyl.  iv.    46  ;  Sido- 

communication.     C.  61  provides  a  nius,  Ep.  iv.  12  '  legebamus,  pariter 

six-years' excommunication  for  bear-  laudabamus,  iocabamurque.' 
leaders  and  such.    C.  62  deals  with 

CHAMBERS.    I  C 


18  MINSTRELSY 

and  particularly  erotic  tragedy,  over  his  tempestuous  youth  *. 
And  in  the  City  of  God  he  draws  a  careful  distinction  between 
the  higher  and  the  lower  forms  of  drama,  and  if  he  does  not 
approve,  at  least  does  not  condemn,  the  use  of  tragedies  and 
comedies  in  a  humane  education 2.  Jerome,  on  the  other  hand, 
although  himself  like  Augustine  a  good  scholar,  takes  a  more 
ascetic  line,  and  a  letter  of  his  protesting  against  the  reading 
of  comedies  by  priests  ultimately  came  to  be  quoted  as  arr 
authority  in  Roman  canon  law  3. 

The  references  to  the  stage  in  the  works  of  two  somewhat 
younger  ecclesiastical  writers  are  of  exceptional  interest. 
Orosius  was  a  pupil  of  both  Jerome  and  Augustine  ;  and 
Orosius,  endeavouring  a  few  years  after  the  sack  of  Rome  by 
the  Goths  to  prove  that  that  startling  disaster  was  not  due  to 
Christianity,  lays  great  and  indeed  exaggerated  importance 
on  the  share  of  the  theatre  in  promoting  the  decay  of  the 
Empire  4.  About  the  middle  of  the  fifth  century  the  same 
note  is  struck  by  Salvian  in  his  remarkable  treatise  De  Guber- 
natione  Dei 5.  The  sixth  book  of  his  work  is  almost  entirely 
devoted  to  the  spectacula.  Like  Tertullian,  Salvian  insists  on 
the  definite  renunciation  of  spectacula  by  Christians  in  their 
baptismal  vow  6.     Like  Orosius,  he  traces  to  the  weakening  of 

1  Augustine,  Conf.  iii.  2,  3  (P.  L.  facere  voluptatis '  (C.  I.  Can.  i. 
xxxii.  683).     The  whim   took  him      37.  2). 

once   '  theatrici  carminis  certamen  4  Orosius,    Hist.   adv.   Paganos 

inire.'  (417),  iv.  21.  5  'theatra  incusanda, 

2  Aug.  de  Civ.  Dei,  ii.  8  {P.  L.  non  tempora.'  On  the  character  of 
xli.  53)  'et  haec  sunt  scenico-  the  treatise  of  Orosius  cf.  Dill,  312; 
rum  tolerabiliora  ludorum,  comoe-  Gibbon,  iii.  490.  Mr.  Dill  shows 
diae  scilicet  et  tragoediae  ;  hoc  est,  in  the  third  book  of  his  admirable 
fabulae  poetarum  agendae  in  spec-  work  that  bad  government  and  bad 
taculis,  multa  rerum  turpitudine  sed  finance  had  much  more  to  do  with 
nulla  saltern  sicut  alia  multa  ver-  the  breakdown  of  the  Empire  than 
borum    obscoenitate     compositae  ;  the  bad  morals  of  the  stage. 

quas  etiam  inter  studia  quae  honesta  6  Dill,  58,  137;  Hodgkin,  i.  930. 

ac  libcralia  vocantur  pueri  legere  et  Salvian  was  a  priest  of  Marseilles, 

discere  coguntur  a  senibus.'  and  wrote  between  439  and  451. 

3  Jerome,  Eft.  21  (alii  146)  ad  6  Salvian,  vi.  31  'quae  est  enim 
Damasian,  written  383  (P.  L.  xxii.  in  baptismo  salutari  Christianorum 
386)  'at  nunc  etiam  sacerdotes  prima  confessio  ?  quae  scilicet  nisi 
Dei,  omissisevangeliis  et  prophetis,  ut  renuntiare  se  diabolo  ac  pompis 
videmus  comoedias  legere, amatoria  eius  et  spectaculis  atque  operibus 
bucolicorum  versuum  verba  canere,  protestentur  ? '  The  natural  inter- 
tenere  Vergilium,  et  id  quod  in  pretation  of  this  is  that  the  word 
pueris  necessitatis  est,  crimen  in  se  '  spectaculis '  actually  occurred  in 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  19 

moral  fibre  by  these  accursed  amusements  the  failure  of  the  West 
to  resist  the  barbarians.  Moritur  et  ridct  is  his  epigram  on  the 
Roman  world.  The  citizens  of  Treves,  three  times  destroyed, 
still  called  upon  their  rulers  for  races  and  a  theatre.  With  the 
Vandals  at  the  very  gates  of  Cirta  and  of  Carthage,  ccclesia 
Carthaginiensis  insaniebat  in  circis,  luxuriebat  in  theatrisx. 
Incidentally  Salvian  gives  some  valuable  information  as  to 
the  survival  of  the  stage  in  his  day.  Already  in  400  Augustine  / 
had  been  able  to  say  that  the  theatres  were  falling  on  every 
side  2.  Salvian,  fifty  years  later,  confirms  the  testimony,  but 
he  adds  the  reason.  It  was  not  because  Christians  had  learnt 
to  be  faithful  to  their  vows  and  to  the  teachings  of  the  Church  ; 
but  because  the  barbarians,  who  despised  spectacula,  and  therein 
set  a  good  example  to  degenerate  Romans  '6,  had  sacked  half 
the  cities,  while  in  the  rest  the  impoverished  citizens  could  no 
longer  pay  the  bills.  He  adds  that  at  Rome  a  circus  was  still 
open  and  a  theatre  at  Ravenna,  and  that  these  were  thronged 
with  delighted  travellers  from  all  parts  of  the  Empire  4.  There 
must,  however,  have  been  a  theatre  at  Rome  as  well,  for 
Sidonius  found  it  there  when  he  visited  the  city,  twelve  years 
after  it  had  been  sacked  for  the  second  time,  in  467.  He  was 
appointed  prefect  of  the  city,  and  in  one  of  his  letters  expresses 
a  fear  lest,  if  the  corn-supply  fail,  the  thunders  of  the  theatre 
may  burst  upon  his  head 5.  In  a  poem  written  a  few  years 
earlier  he  describes  the  spectacula  thcatri  of  mimes,  panto- 
mimes, and  acrobats  as  still  flourishing  at  Narbonne 6. 

The  next  and  the  latest  records  of  the  stage  in  the  West 

the  formula  abrenuntiationis.   Was  pene   civitates   cadunt  theatra  .  .  . 

this  so  ?     It  was  not  when  Tertul-  cadunt  et  fora  vel  moenia,  in  quibus 

lian  wrote  (t2co).     He  gives  the  demonia   colebantur.     Unde   enim 

formula  as  '  renunciare  diabolo  et  cadunt,  nisi  inopia  rerum,  quarum 

pompae  et  angelis  eius,'  and  goes  lascivo  et  sacrilego  usu  constructa 

on  to  argue  that  visiting  '  spectacula'  sunt.' 

amounts  to 'idolatria,' or  worship  of         3  This  point  was  made  also  by 

the  '  diabolus '  {de  Spectaculz's,  c.  4).  Chrysostom  in  the  Easter-day  ser- 

Nor  is  the  word  used  in  any  of  the  mon,  already  cited  on  p.  15. 
numerous  versions  of  the  formula         *  Salvian,  vi.  39,  42,  49. 
given  by  Schaff,iii.  248;   Duchesne,  6  Sidonius,  Ep.  i.  10.  2  '  vereor 

293  ;   Martene,  i.  44 ;    Martin  von  autem    ne  famem    Populi  Romani 

Bracara,  de  Caeremoniis  (ed.  Cas-  theatralis  caveae  fragor  insonet  et 

pari),  c.l 5.  infortunio    meo   publica   deputetur 

1  Salvian,  vi.  69,  87.  esuries' ;  cf.  Ep.  i.  5.  10. 

2  Augustine,  de  Cons.  Evang.  i.  6  Sidonius,     Carm.     xxiii.      263 
33  (P.  L.  xxxiv.  1068)  'per  omnes  (t46o) ;  cf.  Ep.  ix.  13.  5. 

C  2 


SO  MINSTRELSY 

date  from  the  earlier  part  of  the  sixth  century,  when  the 
Ostrogoths  held  sway  in  Italy.  They  are  to  be  found  in 
the  Variae  of  Cassiodorus,  who  held  important  official  posts 
under  the  new  lords  of  Rome,  and  they  go  to  confirm  the  in- 
ference which  the  complaint  of  Salvian  already  suggests  that 
a  greater  menace  to  the  continuance  of  the  theatre  lay  in  the 
taste  of  the  barbarians  than  even  in  the  ethics  of  Christianity. 
The  Ostrogoths  had  long  dwelt  within  the  frontiers  of  the 
Empire,  and  Theodoric,  ruling  as  '  King  of  the  Goths  and 
Romans  in  Italy,'  over  a  mixed  multitude  of  Italians  and 
Italianate  Germans,  found  it  necessary  to  continue  the 
spectacula,  which  in  his  heart  he  despised.  There  are  many 
indications  of  this  in  the  state-papers  preserved  in  the  Variae, 
which  may  doubtless  be  taken  to  express  the  policy  and  temper 
of  the  masters  of  Cassiodorus  in  the  rhetorical  trappings  of 
the  secretary  himself.  The  scenici  are  rarely  mentioned  with- 
out a  sneer,  but  their  performances  and  those  of  the  aurigae, 
or  circus-drivers,  who  have  now  come  to  be  included  under 
the  all-embracing  designation  of  histriones,  are  carefully 
regulated  *.  The  gladiators  have,  indeed,  at  last  disappeared, 
two  centuries  after  Constantine  had  had  the  grace  to  sup- 
press them  in  the  East2.  There  is  a  letter  from  Theodoric 
to  an  architect,  requiring  him  to  repair  the  theatre  of  Pompey, 
and  digressing  into  an  historical  sketch,  imperfectly  erudite, 
of  the  history  of  the  drama,  its  invention  by  the  Greeks,  and 
its  degradation  by  the  Romans  3.  A  number  of  documents 
deal  with  the  choice  of  a  pantomimus  to  represent  the  prasini 
or  '  Greens/  and  show  that  the  rivalry  of  the  theatre-factions 

1  Cassiodorus,  Variae,  iii.  51  xv.  12.  I  '  cruenta  spectacula  in 
'quantum  histrionibus  rara  con-  otio  civili  et  domestica  quiete  non 
stantia  honestumque  votum,  tanto  placent;  quapropter  omnino  gladia- 
pretiosior  est,  cum  in  eis  probabilis  tores  esse  prohibemus  (325).' 
monstratur  affectus  '  ;  this  is  illus-  3  Cassiodorus,  Far.  iv.  51.  Of 
trated  by  the  conduct  of  one  the  mime  is  said  '  mimus  etiam, 
'Thomas  Auriga';  Var.\\.  8  '  Sa-  qui  nunc  modo  derisui  habetur, 
binus  auriga  .  .  .  quamvis  histrio  tanta  Philistionis  cautela  repertus 
honesta  nos  supplicatione  per-  est  uteius  actus  poneretur  in  litteris' 
movit ' ;  Var.  vi.  4  '  tanta  enim  est  (cf.  p.  4,  n.  1) ;  of  the  pantomime, 
vis  gloriosae  veritatis,  ut  etiam  in  '  orchestrarum  loquacissimae  ma- 
rebus  scenicis  aequitas  desideretur.'  nus,  linguosi  digiti,  silentium  cla- 

2  Schaff,  v.  122  ;  Dill,  55.     The  mosum,  expositio  tacita.' 
rescript  of  Constantine  is   C.  Th. 


THE  FALL  OF  THE  THEATRES  21 

remained  as  fierce  as  it  had  been  in  the  days  of  Bathyllus  and 
Pylades.  Helladius  is  given  the  preference  over  Thorodon, 
and  a  special  proclamation  exhorts  the  people  to  keep  the 
peace 1.  Still  more  interesting  is  the  formula,  preserved  by 
Cassiodorus,  which  was  used  in  the  appointment  of  the 
tribunus  voluptatam,  an  official  whom  we  have  already  come 
across  in  the  rescripts  of  the  emperors  of  the  fourth  century. 
This  is  so  characteristic,  in  its  contemptuous  references  to  the 
nature  of  the  functions  which  it  confers,  of  the  whole  German 
attitude  in  the  matter  of  spectacula,  that  it  seems  worth  while 
to  print  it  in  an  appendix2.  The  passages  hitherto  quoted 
from  the  Variae  all  seem  to  belong  to  the  period  between  507 
and  511,  when  Cassiodorus  was  quaestor  and  secretary  to 
Theodoric  at  Rome.  A  single  letter  written  about  533  in  the 
reign  of  Athalaric  shows  that  the  populace  was  still  looking 
to  its  Gothic  rulers  for  spectacula,  and  still  being  gratified  3. 
Beyond  this  the  Roman  theatre  has  not  been  traced.  The 
Goths  passed  in  553,  and  Italy  was  reabsorbed  in  the  Empire. 
In  568  came  the  Lombards,  raw  Germans  who  had  been  but 
little  under  southern  influence,  and  were  far  less  ready  than 
their  predecessors  to  adopt  Roman  manners.  Rome  and 
Ravenna  alone  remained  as  outposts  of  the  older  civilization, 
the  latter  under  an  exarch  appointed  from  Constantinople,  the 
former  under  its  bishop.  At  Ravenna  the  theatre  may  con- 
ceivably have  endured  ;  at  Rome,  the  Rome  of  Gregory  the 
Great,  it  assuredly  did  not.  An  alleged  mention  of  a  theatre 
at  Barcelona  in  Spain  during  the  seventh  century  resolves 
itself  into  either  a  survival  of  pagan  ritual  or  a  bull-fight4. 

1  Cassiodorus,  Var.  i.  20,  31-3.  cision    to    the    bishop.     He    says, 

2  Cf.  Appendix  A.  '  obiectum  hoc,  quod  de  ludis  thea- 

3  Cassiodorus,  Var.  ix.  21  'opes  triis  tauroram,  scilicet,  ministerio 
nostras  scaenicis  pro  populi  oble-  sis  adeptus  nulli  videtur  incertum  ; 
ctatione  largimur.'  quis  non  videat  quod  etiam  videre 

4  Du  Meril,  Or.  Lat.  13,  quotes  poeniteat.'  But  I  cannot  find  in 
from  Mariana,  Hist,  of  Spain,  vi.  3,  Sisebut  or  in  Mariana,  who  writes 
the  statement  that  Sisebut,  king  of  Spanish,  the  words  quoted  by  Du 
the  Visigoths,  deposed  Eusebius,  Meril.  For  '  taurorum '  one  MS. 
bishop  ot  Barcelona,  in  618,  '  quod  has  '  phanorum.'  I  suspect  the 
in  theatro  quaedam  agi  concessisset  former  is  right.  A  bull-fight  sounds 
quae  ex  vana  deorum  superstitione  so  Spanish,  and  such  festivals  of 
traducta  aures  Christianae  abhor-  heathen  origin  as  the  Kalends  (cf. 
rere  videantur.'  Sisebuthus,  Efi.  vi  ch.  xi)  were  not  held  in  theatres. 
(P.  L.  lxxx.  370),  conveys  his  de-  A.   Gassier,   Lc   Theatre  espagnol 


22  MINSTRELSY 

Isidore  of  Seville  has  his  learned  chapters  on  the  stage,  but 
they  are  written  in  the  imperfect  tense,  as  of  what  is  past  and 
gone  1.     The  bishops  and  the  barbarians  had  triumphed. 

(1898),  14,  thinks  such  a  festival  is  (ch.  xiii).     In  any  case  there  is  no 

intended  ;  if  so, '  theatriis'  probably  question  of  '  scenici.' 
means  not  literally,  'in  a  theatre,'  J  Isidorus    Hispalencis,   Etymo- 

but  merely  'theatrical';  cf.  the  'ludi  logiarum  (600-636),  xviii.  42  (P.  L. 

theatrales'  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  lxxxii.  658). 


CHAPTER  II 

MIMUS  AND   SCOP 

[Bibliographical  Note  (for  chs.  ii-iv). — By  far  the  best  account  of 
minstrelsy  is  the  section  on  Les  Propagateurs  des  Chansons  de  Gestes  in 
vol.  ii  of  L.  Gautier,  Les  Epope'es  franqaiscs  (2nd  ed.  1892),  bk.  ii,  chs. 
xvii-xxi.  It  may  be  supplemented  by  the  chapter  devoted  to  the  subject 
in  J.  Bedier,  Les  Fabliaux  (2nd  ed.  1895),  and  by  the  dissertation  of 
E.  Freymond,  Jongleurs  und  Menestrals  (Halle,  1S83).  I  have  not  seen 
A.  Olrik,  Middel alder  ens  vandrende  Spillemcend  {Opuscula  Philolegica, 
Copenhagen,  1887).  Some  German  facts  are  added  by  F.  Vogt,  Lebcn 
und Dichten  der  deutschen  Spielleute  im  Mittelalter  (1S76),  and  A.  Schultz, 
Das  hqfische  Leben-  zur  Zeit  der  Minnesinger  (2nd  ed.  1889),  i.  565,  who 
gives  further  references.  The  English  books  are  not  good,  and  probably 
the  most  reliable  account  of  English  minstrelsy  is  that  in  the  following 
pages  ;  but  materials  may  be  found  in  J.  Strutt,  Sports  and  Pastimes  of 
the  People  of  England  (1801,  ed.  W.  Hone,  1830) ;  T.  Percy,  Reliques  of 
Ancient  English  Poetry  (ed.  H.  B.  Wheatley,  1876,  ed.  Schroer,  1889); 
J.  Ritson,  Ancient  English  Metrical  Romances  (1802),  Ancient  Songs 
and  Ballads  (1829) ;  W.  Chappell,  Old  English  Popular  Music  (ed.  H.  E. 
Wooldridge,  1893) ;  F.  J.  Crowest,  The  Story  of  British  Music,  from  the 
Earliest  Times  to  the  Tudor  Period (1896);  J.J.  Jusserand,  English  Way- 
faring Li  fe  in  the  Middle  Ages  (trans.  L.T.  Smith,  4th  ed.  1892).  The  early 
English  data  are  discussed'by  R.  Merbot,  Aesthetische  Studien  zur  angel- 
sachsischen  Poesie  (1883 ),  and  F.  M.  Padelford,  Old  English  Musical  Terms 
(1899).  F.  B.  Gummere,  The  Beginnings  of  Poetry  (1901),  should  be  con- 
sulted on  the  relations  of  minstrelsy  to  communal  poetry ;  and  other  special 
points  are  dealt  with  by  O.  Hubatsch,  Die  lateinischen  Vagantenlieder  des 
Mittelalters  (1870)  ;  G.  Maugras,  Les  Comddiens  hors  la  Loi  (1887),  and 
H.  Lavoix,  La  Musique  an  Siecle  de  Saint-Louis  (in  G.  Raynaud,  Recueil 
de  Motets  francais,  1883,  vol.  ii).  To  the  above  list  of  authorities  should 
of  course  be  added  the  histories  of  literature  and  of  the  drama  enu- 
merated in  the  General  Bibliographical  Note.] 

The  fall  of  the  theatres  by  no  means  implied  the  complete 
extinction  of  the  scenici.  They  had  outlived  tragedy  and 
comedy :  they  were  destined  to  outlive  the  stage  itself. 
Private  performances,  especially  of  pantomimi  and  other 
dancers,  had  enjoyed  great  popularity  under  the  Empire, 
and  had  become  an  invariable  adjunct  of  all  banquets  and 
other  festivities.  At  such  revels,  as  at  the  decadence  of  the 
theatre  and  of  public  morals  generally,  the  graver  pagans  had 


24  MINSTRELSY 

looked  askance l :  the  Church  naturally  included  them  in  its 
universal  condemnation  of  spectacula.  Chrysostom  in  the 
East2,  Jerome  in  the  West3,  are  hostile  to  them,  and  1 
canon  of  the  fourth-century  council  of  Laodicea,  requiring 
the  clergy  who  might  be  present  at  weddings  and  similar 
rejoicings  to  rise  and  leave  the  room  before  the  actors  were 
introduced,  was  adopted  by  council  after  council  and  took  its 
place  as  part  of  the  ecclesiastical  law  4.  The  permanence  of 
the  regulation  proves  the  strength  of  the  habit,  which  indeed 
the  Church  might  ban,  but  was  not  able  to  subdue,  and  which 
seems  to  have  commended  itself,  far  more  than  the  theatre,  to 
Teutonic  manners.  Such  irregular  performances  proved  a 
refuge  for  the  dispossessed  scenici.  Driven  from  their  theatres, 
they  had  still  a  vogue,  not  only  at  banquets,  but  at  popular 
merry-makings  or  wherever  in  street  or  country  they  could 
gather  together  the  remnant  of  their  old  audiences.  Adversity 
and  change  of  masters  modified  many  of  their  characteristics. 
The  pantomiini,  in  particular,  fell  upon  evil  times.  Their 
subtle  art  had  had  its  origin  in  an  exquisite  if  corrupt  taste, 
and  adapted  itself  with  difficulty  to  the  ruder  conditions  of 
the  new  civilizations 5.  The  mimi  had  always  appealed  to 
a  common  and  gross  humanity.  But  even  they  must  now 
rub  shoulders  and  contend  for  denarii  with  jugglers  and  with 
rope-dancers,  with  out-at-elbows  gladiators  and  beast-tamers. 
More  than  ever  they  learnt  to  turn  their  hand  to  anything 
that  might  amuse ;  learnt  to  tumble,  for  instance ;  learnt  to 
tell  the  long  stories  which  the  Teutons  loved.  Nevertheless, 
in  essentials  they  remained  the  same  ;  still  jesters  and  buffoons, 


1  Macrobius, Saturnalia,  ii.  1. 5,9.  Cone,  of  Aix-la-Chapelle  (816)  c.  83 

2  Chrysostom,  Horn,  in  Ep.  ad  (Mansi,  vii.  1361);  and  finally,  C.  I. 
Col.  cap.  1,  Horn.  i.  cc.  5,  6  (P.  G.  Can.  hi.  5.  37  'non  oportet  ministros 
lxii.  306).  altaris  vel  quoslibet  clericos  specta- 

3  Jerome,  Ep.  117  (P.  L.  xxii.  culis  aliquibus,  quae  aut  in  nuptiis 
957)  'difficile  inter  epulas  servatur  aut  scenis  exhibentur, interesse,sed 
pudicitia';  cf.  Dill,  no.  ante,  quam  thymelici  ingrediantur, 

*  Cone,   of  Laodicea    (t  343-81)  surgere  eos  de  eonvivio  et  abire.'    It 

can.54(Mansi,ii.574)oT(oi<Seu'epar£-  is   noteworthy  that   'scenis'   here 

Koi/s  i]  K.\rjptKois  tivus  decoplas  deaptlf  translates  deinvois. 
tv  ydfiois   r)    delnvois,   aXXa  npo  tov  b  Muratori  Antiq.Ital.Aled.Aev. 

elaepxetrdai  roiis  dv^eXinovs  iyeipecrOat.  ii.  847,  traces  the  pantomimi  in  the 

avrois  Kal  ufaxcopelv.     Cf.  Cone,  of  Italian  mattaccini. 
Braga  (iS72)  c.  60  (Mansi,  v.  912), 


MIMUS  AND  SC6P  25 

still  irrepressible,  still  obscene.  In  little  companies  of  two 
or  three,  they  padded  the  hoof  along  the  roads,  travelling 
from  gathering  to  gathering,  making  their  own  welcome  in 
castle  or  tavern,  or,  if  need  were,  sleeping  in  some  grange  or 
beneath  a  wayside  hedge  in  the  white  moonlight.  They  were, 
in  fact,  absorbed  into  that  vast  body  of  nomad  entertainers  on 
whom  so  much  of  the  gaiety  of  the  Middle  Ages  depended. 
They  became  ioculatores,  jongleurs,  minstrels1. 

The  features  of  the  minstrels  as  we  trace  them  obscurely 
from  the  sixth  to  the  eleventh  century,  and  then  more  clearly 
from  the  eleventh  to  the  sixteenth,  are  very  largely  the 
features  of  the  Roman  mimi  as  they  go  under,  whelmed  in 
the  flood  which  bore  away  Latin  civilization.  But  to  regard 
them  as  nothing  else  than  mimi  would  be  a  serious  mistake. 
On  another  side  they  have  a  very  different  and  a  far  more 
reputable  ancestry.  Like  other  factors  in  mediaeval  society, 
they  represent  a  merging  of  Latin  and  the  Teutonic  elements. 
They  inherit  the  tradition  of  the  mimns :  they  inherit  also 
the  tradition  of  the  German  scop".  The  earliest  Teutonic 
poetry,  so  far  as  can  be  gathered,  knew  no  scop.  As  will  be 
shown  in  a  later  chapter,  it  was  communal  in  character,  closely 
bound  up  with  the  festal  dance,  or  with  the  rhythmic  move- 
ments of  labour.  It  was  genuine  folk-song,  the  utterance 
of  no  select  caste  of  singers,  but  of  whoever  in  the  ring  of 
worshippers  or  workers  had  the  impulse  and  the  gift  to  link 
the  common  movements  to  articulate  words.  At  the  festivals 
such  a  spokesman  would  be  he  who,  for  whatever  reason,  took 
the  lead  in  the  ceremonial  rites,  the  vates,  germ  at  once  of 
priest  and  bard.  The  subject-matter  of  communal  song  was 
naturally  determined  by  the  interests  ruling  on  the  occasions 
when  it  was  made.  That  of  daily  life  would  turn  largely  on 
the  activities  of  labour  itself:  that  of  the  high  days  on  the 
emotions  of  religion,  feasting,  and  love  which  were  evoked  by 
the  primitive  revels  of  a  pastoral  or  agricultural  folk. 

Presently  the  movements  of  the  populations  of  Europe 
brought  the  Germanic  tribes,  after  separating  from  their 
Scandinavian  kinsmen,  into  contact  with  Kelts,  with  Huns, 

1  Cf.  Appendix  B.  Romania    (1876),    260  ;    G.    Paris, 

2  Ten  Brink,  i.  11 ;   P.  Meyer  in      36 ;  Gautier,  ii.  6  ;  Kogel,  i.  2.  191. 


26  MINSTRELSY 

with  the  Roman  Empire,  and,  in  the  inevitable  recoil,  with 
each  other.   Then  for  the  first  time  war  assumed  a  prerogative 
place  in  their  life.     To  war,  the  old  habits  and  the  old  poetry 
adapted  themselves.     Tiwaz,  once  primarily  the  god  of  bene- 
ficent heaven,  became  the  god  of  battles.    The  chant  of  prayer 
before  the  onset,  the  chant  of  triumph  and  thanksgiving  after 
the  victory,  made  themselves  heard  \     From  these  were  dis- 
engaged, as  a  distinct  species  of  poetry,  songs  in  praise  of  the 
deeds  and  deaths  of  great  captains  and  popular  heroes.  Tacitus 
tells  us  that  poetry  served  the  Germans  of  his  day  for  both 
chronology  and  history  2.     Jordanis,  four  centuries  later,  has 
a  similar  account  to  give  of  the  Ostrogoths  3.     Arminius,  the 
vanquisher  of  a  Roman  army,  became  the  subject  of  heroic 
songs4:  Athalaric  has  no  higher  word  of  praise  for  Gensimund 
than  cantabilis5.     The  glories  of  Alboin  the  Lombard6,  of 
Charlemagne  himself7,  found  celebration  in  verse,  and  Charle- 
magne was  at  the  pains  to  collect  and  record  the  still  earlier 
cantilenae  which  were  the  chronicle  of  his  race.     Such  his- 
torical cantilenae,  mingled  with  more  primitive  ones  of  mytho- 
logical import,  form  the  basis  of  the  great  legendary  epics  8. 
But  the  process  of  epic-making  is  one  of  self-conscious  and  de- 
liberate art,  and  implies  a  considerable  advance  from  primitive 
modes  of  literary  composition.     No  doubt  the  earliest  heroic 
cantilenae  were  still  communal  in  character.     They  were  rondes 
footed  and  sung  at  festivals  by  bands  of  young  men  and  maidens. 
Nor  was  such   folk-song   quick  to  disappear.     Still   in  the 

1  Tacitus,  Ann.  i.  65  ;  iv.  47  ;  adhuc  barbaras  apud  gentes.' 
Hist.  n.  22;  iv.  18;  v.  15  ;  Germ.  5  Cassiodorus,  Far.  viii.  9. 
3  ;  Ammianus  Marcellinus,  xvi.  12.  6  Kdgel,  i.  1.  122,  quoting  Paulus 

43  ;    xxxi.  7.  1 1  ;    Vegetius,  de  re  Diaconus,  i.  27. 
militari,  iii.  18;  cf.  Kogel,  i.  1.  12,         7  Kogel,   i.    1.    122;    i.   2.   220; 

58,    in;     Miillenhoff,    Germania,  Gautier,  i.  72 ;  G.  Paris,  Hist.  Poet. 

ch.  3.     The  barditus  or  barritus  of  de  Charlemagne,  50 ;  cf.  Poeta  Saxo 

the  Germans,  whatever  the  name  (1890)  in  M.  G.  H.Scriptores,  i.  268 

exactly  means,  seems  to  have  been  'est    quoque  iam  notum;    vulgaria 

articulate,  and  not  a  mere  noise.  carmina  magnis  laudibus  eius  avos 

•  Tacitus,  Germ.  2  'quod  unum  et    proavos    celebrant.      Pippinos, 

apud   lllos  memoriae  et  annalium  Karolos,  Hludiwicos  et  Theodricos, 

genus  est.'  et  Carlomannos  Hlothariosque  ca- 

Jordanis,  de  orig.  Getarian  (in  nunt.' 
M.  G.  H.),  c.  4  'in  priscis  eorum  8  Gautier,  i.  37 ;  Grober,  ii.  1.447. 

carminibus  pene  storico  ritu  in  com-  The  shades  of  opinion  on  the  exact 

mune  recohtur.'  relation   of  the   cantilenae  to  the 

Tacitus,  Ann.  ii.   88   '  canitur  chansons  de  gestes  are  numerous. 


MIMUS  AND  SC6P 


27 


eleventh  century  the  deeds  of  St.  William  of  Orange  resounded 
amongst  the  chori  iuvenum1 ;  and  spinning- room  and  village 
green  were  destined  to  hear  similar  strains  for  many  centuries 
more  2.  But  long  before  this  the  cantilenae  had  entered  upon 
another  and  more  productive  course  of  development :  they 
were  in  the  mouths,  not  only  of  the  folk,  but  also  of  a  body 
of  professional  singers,  the  fashioners  of  the  epic  that  was 
to  be 3.     Like  heroic  song  itself,  the  professional  singers  owed 


1  Vita  S.  Willelmi  {Acta  SS. 
Mali,  vi.  80 1 )  '  qui  chori  iuve- 
num,  qui  conventus  populorum, 
praecipue  militum  ac  nobilium 
virorum,  quae  vigiliae  sanctorum 
dulce  non  resonant,  et  modulatis 
vocibus  decantant  qualis  et  quantus 
fuerit ' ;  cf.  Gautier,  i.  66.  The 
merest  fragments  of  such  folk-song 
heroic  cantilenae  are  left.  A  German 
one,  the  Ludwigslied,  on  the  battle 
of  Saucourt  (881)  is  in  Miillenhoff 
und  Scherer,  Denkmaler  deutscher 
Poesie  unci  Prosa  (1892),  N°.  xi ;  cf. 
Kogel,  i.  2.  86 ;  Gautier,  i.  62.  And 
a  few  lines  of  a  (probably)  French 
one  on  an  event  in  the  reign  of 
Clotaire  (I620)  are  translated  into 
Latin  in  Helgarius  (r  853—76), 
Vita  S.  Faronis  (Historiens  de 
France,  iii.  505  ;  Mabillon,  Acta 
SS.  Benedictinorum,  ii.  610).  Hel- 
garius calls  the  song  a  '  carmen 
rusticum'  and  says  'ex  qua  victoria 
carmen  publicum  iuxta  rusticitatem 
per  omnium  pene  volitabat  ora  ita 
canentium,  feminaeque  choros  inde 
plaudendo  componebant.'  The 
Vita  S.  Faronis  in  Acta  SS.  lx. 
612,  which  is  possibly  an  abridge- 
ment of  Helgarius,  says  '  carmine 
rustico  .  .  .  suavi  cantilena  de- 
cantabatur  ' ;  cf.  Gautier,  i.  47  ; 
Grober,  ii.  1.  446. 

2  Ten  Brink,  i.  148,  quotes  from 
Hist.  Fly,  ii.  27  (tl  166),  a  fragment 
of  a  song  on  Canute,  '  quae  usque 
hodie  in  choris  publice  cantantur,' 
and  mentions  another  instance  from 
Win.  of  Malmesbury.  Cf.  de  Gestis 
Herewardi  Saxonis  (Michel,  Chron. 
Anglo-Norm.  ii.  6)  '  mulieres  et 
puellae  de  eo  in  choris  canebant,' 
and  for  Scotland  the  song  on  Ban- 
nockburn  ( 1 3 1 4)  which,  says  Fabyan, 


Chronicle  (ed.  Ellis),  420,  'was  after 
many  days  sungyn  in  dances,  in 
carolles  of  ye  maydens  and  myn- 
strellys  of  Scotlande '  ;  cf.  also 
Gummere,  B.  P.  265. 

3  It  is  important  to  recognize  that 
the  cantilenae  of  the  folk  and  those 
of  the  professional  singers  existed 
side  by  side.  Both  are,  I  think, 
implied  in  the  account  of  the  St. 
William  songs  quoted  above :  the 
folk  sung  them  in  choruses  and  on 
wake-days,  the  professional  singers 
in  the  assemblies  of  warriors.  At 
any  rate,  in  the  next  (twelfth)  cent. 
Ordericus  Vitalis,  vi.  3  (ed.  Soc. 
de  V Hist,  de  France,  iii.  5),  says  of 
the  same  Willelmus,T  Vulgo  canitur 
a  ioculatoribus  de  illo  cantilena.' 
M.  Gautier  (ii.  6)  will  not  admit  the 
filiation  of  the  ioculatores  to  the 
scopas,  and  therefore  he  is  led  to 
suppose  (i.  78)  that  the  cantilenae 
and  vulgaria  carmina  were  all  folk- 
song up  to  the  end  of  the  tenth  cent, 
and  that  then  the  ioculatores  got 
hold  of  them  and  lengthened  them 
into  chansons  dc  gestes.  But,  as  we 
shall  see  (p.  34),  the  Franks  certainly 
had  their  professional  singers  as 
early  as  Clovis,  and  these  cannot 
well  have  sung  anything  but  heroic 
lays.  Therefore  the  cantilenae  and 
vulgaria  carmina  of  the  Mero- 
vingian and  Carolingian  periods 
may  have  been  either  folk-song,  or 
scop-song,  or,  more  probably,  both 
(Grober,  ii.  1 .  449).  Cantilena  really 
means  no  more  than  'chant'  of  any 
kind  ;  it  includes  ecclesiastical 
chant.  So  Alcuin  uses  it  (e.  g.  Ep. 
civ  in  Diimmler,  ii.  169) ;  and  what 
Gautier,  ii.  65,  prints  as  a  folk-song 
cantilena  of  S.  Eulalia  is  treated 
by  Grober,  ii.  l.  442,  as  a  sequence. 


28  MINSTRELSY 

their  origin  to  war,  and  to  the  prominence  of  the  individual, 
the  hero,  which  war  entailed.  Around  the  person  of  a  great 
leader  gathered  his  individual  following  or  comitattis,  bound 
to  him  by  ties  of  mutual  loyalty,  by  interchange  of  service 
and  reward  K  Amongst  the  comitattis  room  was  found  for 
one  who  was  no  spearman,  but  who,  none  the  less  honoured 
for  that,  became  the  poet  of  the  group  and  took  over  from  the 
less  gifted  chorus  the  duty  if  celebrating  the  praises  of  the 
chieftain.  These  he  sung  to  the  accompaniment,  no  longer 
of  flying  feet,  but  of  the  harp,  struck  when  the  meal  was  over 
in  tent  or  hall.  Such  a  harper  is  the  characteristically  Ger- 
manic type  of  professional  entertainer.  He  has  his  affinities 
with  the  Demodokos  of  a  Homeric  king.  Rich  in  dignities 
and  guerdons,  sitting  at  the  foot  of  the  leader,  consorting  on 
equal  terms  with  the  warriors,  he  differs  wholly  from  the 
scenicus  in/amis,  who  was  the  plaything  and  the  scorn  of 
Rome.  Precisely  when  the  shifting  of  social  conditions  brought 
him  into  being  it  is  hard  to  say.  Tacitus  dees  not  mention 
him,  which  is  no  proof,  but  a  presumption,  that  amongst  the 
tribes  on  the  frontier  he  had  not  yet  made  his  appearance 
in  the  first  century  of  the  Empire.  By  the  fifth  century  he 
was  thoroughly  established,  and  the  earliest  records  point  to 
his  existence  at  least  as  early  as  the  fourth.  These  are  not  to 
be  found  in  Latin  sources,  but  in  those  early  English  poems 
which,  although  probably  written  in  their  extant  forms  after  the 
invasion  of  these  islands,  seem  to  date  back  in  substance  to 
the  age  when  the  Angles  still  dwelt  in  a  continental  home  around 
the  base  of  the  Jutish  peninsula.  The  English  remained  to  a 
comparatively  late  stage  of  their  history  remote  from  Roman 
influence,  and  it  is  in  their  literature  that  both  the  original 
development  of  the  Teutonic  scop  and  his  subsequent  con- 
tamination by  the  Roman  mimus  can  most  easily  be  studied. 
The  earliest  of  all  English  poems  is  almost  certainly 
Widsith,  the  'far-traveller.'  This  has  been  edited  and 
interpolated  in  Christian  England,  but  the  kernel  of  it  is 
heathen  and  continental 2.  It  is  an  autobiographic  sketch 
of  the  life  of  Widsith,  who  was  himself  an  actual  or  ideal  scop, 
or  rather  gleomon,  for  the  precise  term  scop  is  not  used  in  the 
1  Gummere,  G.  0.  260.  2  Grein,  i.  1. 


MIMUS  AND  SCOP  29 

poem.  Widsith  was  of  the  Myrgings,  a  small  folk  who  dwelt 
hard  by  the  Angles.  In  his  youth  he  went  with  Ealhhild,  the 
1  weaver  of  peace,'  on  a  mission  to  Eormanric  the  Ostrogoth. 
Eormanric  is  the  Hermanric  of  legend,  and  his  death  in 
37 5  A.D.  gives  an  approximate  date  to  the  events  narrated. 
Then  Widsith  became  a  wanderer  upon  the  face  of  the  earth, 
one  who  could  '  sing  and  say  a  story'  in  the  '  mead-hall.'  He 
describes  the  nations  and  rulers  he  has  known.  Eormanric 
gave  him  a  collar  of  beaten  gold,  and  Guthhere  the  Burgundian 
a  ring.  He  has  been  with  Caesar,  lord  of  jocund  cities,  and 
has  seen  Franks  and  Lombards,  Finns  and  Huns,  Picts  and 
Scots,  Hebrews,  Indians,  Egyptians,  Medes  and  Persians.  At 
the  last  he  has  returned  to  the  land  of  the  Myrgings,  and  with 
his  fellow  Scilling  has  sung  loud  to  the  harp  the  praises  of 
his  lord  Eadgils  and  of  Ealhhild  the  daughter  of  Eadwine. 
Eadgils  has  given  him  land,  the  inheritance  of  his  fathers. 
The  poem  concludes  with  an  eulogy  of  the  life  of  gleemen. 
They  wander  through  realm  upon  realm,  voice  their  needs, 
and  have  but  to  give  thanks.  In  every  land  they  find  a  lord 
to  whom  songs  are  dear,  and  whose  bounty  is  open  to  the 
exalters  of  his  name.  Of  less  undeniable  antiquity  than  Widsith 
are  the  lines  known  as  the  Complaint  of  Deor.  These  touch 
the  seamy  side  of  the  singer's  life.  Deor  has  been  the  scop 
of  the  Heodenings  many  winters  through.  But  one  more 
skilled,  Heorrenda  by  name — the  Horant  of  the  Gudrun 
saga — has  outdone  him  in  song,  and  has  been  granted  the 
land-right  that  once  was  Deor's.  He  finds  his  consolation  in 
the  woes  of  the  heroes  of  old.  '  They  have  endured  :  may 
not  I  endure1?'  The  outline  drawn  in  Widsith  and  in  Deor 
is  completed  by  various  passages  in  the  epic  of  Beowulf ',  which 
may  be  taken  as  representing  the  social  conditions  of  the  sixth 
or  early  seventh  century.  In  Heorot,  the  hall  of  Hrothgar, 
there  was  sound  of  harp,  the  gleewood.  Sweetly  sang  the 
scop  after  the  mead-bench.  The  lay  was  sung,  the  gleeman's 
gyd  told.  Hrothgar's  thanes,  even  Hrothgar  himself,  took 
their  turns  to  unfold  the  wondrous  tale.  On  the  other  hand, 
when  a  folk  is  in  sorrow,  no  harp  is  heard,  the  glee-beam  is 
silent  in  the  halls2.  In  these  three  poems,  then,  is  fully 
1  Grein,  i.  278.     a  Beowulf,  89,  499,  869,  1064,  1 162,  2106,  2259,  2449. 


30  MINSTRELSY 

limned  the  singer  of  Teutonic  heathenism.  He  is  a  man 
of  repute,  the  equal  of  thanes.  He  holds  land,  even  the 
land  of  his  fathers.  He  receives  gifts  of  gold  from  princes 
for  the  praise  he  does  them.  As  yet  no  distinction  appears 
between  scop  and  gleomon.  Widsith  is  at  one  time  the  resident 
singer  of  a  court ;  at  another,  as  the  mood  takes  him,  a  wanderer 
to  the  ends  of  the  earth.  And  though  the  scop  leads  the  song, 
the  warriors  and  the  king  himself  do  not  disdain  to  take  part 
in  it.  This  is  noteworthy,  because  it  gives  the  real  measure 
of  the  difference  between  the  Teutonic  and  the  Roman  enter- 
tainer. For  a  Nero  to  perform  amongst  the  scenici  was  to 
descend  :  for  a  Hrothgar  to  touch  the  harp  was  a  customary 
and  an  honourable  act. 

The  singing  did  not  cease  when  the  English  came  to  these 
islands.  The  long  struggle  with  the  Britons  which  succeeded 
the  invasions  assuredly  gave  rise  to  many  new  lays,  both  in 
Northumbria  and  Wessex.  '  England,'  says  Mr.  Stopford 
Brooke,  ( was  conquered  to  the  music  of  verse,  and  settled 
to  the  sound  of  the  harp.'  But  though  Alfred  and  Dunstan 
knew  such  songs,  they  are  nearly  all  lost,  or  only  dimly 
discerned  as  the  basis  of  chronicles.  At  the  end  of  the  sixth 
century,  just  as  the  conquest  was  completed,  came  Christianity. 
The  natural  development  of  English  poetry  was  to  some 
extent  deflected.  A  religious  literature  grew  up  at  the  hands 
of  priests.  Eadhelm,  who,  anticipating  a  notion  of  St.  Francis 
of  Assisi,  used  to  stand  on  a  bridge  as  if  he  were  a  gleeman, 
and  waylay  the  folk  as  they  hurried  back  from  mass,  himself 
wrote  pious  songs.  One  of  these,  a  carmen  triviale,  was  still 
sung  in  the  twelfth  century1.  This  was  in  Wessex.  In 
Northumbria,  always  the  most  literary  district  of  early 
England,  the  lay  brother  Caedmon  founded  a  school  of  divine 
poetry.  But  even  amongst  the  disciples  of  Caedmon,  some, 
such  as  the  author  of  the  very  martial  Judith,  seem  to  have 
designed  their  work  for  the  mead-hall  as  well  as  the  monas- 
tery2. And  the  regular  scop  by  no  means  vanished.  The 
Wanderer ,  a  semi-heathen  elegiac  poem  of  the  early  eighth 

1  William    of    Malmesbury,    de     ...  sensim    inter    ludicra    verbis 
gestis  Pontif.  Angl.   (R.   S.),   336      scripturarum  insertis.' 
'  quasi  artem  cantitandi  professum,         2  Grein,  ii.  294. 


MIMUS  AND  SCOP  31 

century,  seems  to  be  the  lament  of  a  scop  driven  from  his 
haunts,  not  by  Christianity,  but  by  the  tumults  of  the  day1. 
The  great  poet  of  the  next  generation,  Cynewulf,  himself 
took  treasure  of  appled  gold  in  the  mead-hall.  A  riddle 
on  'the  wandering  singer'  is  ascribed  to  him2,  and  various 
poems  of  his  school  on  the  fates  or  the  crafts  of  man  bear 
witness  to  the  continued  existence  of  the  class 3.  With 
the  eighth  century,  except  for  the  songs  of  war  quoted 
or  paraphrased  in  the  Anglo-Saxon  Chronicle,  the  extant 
Early  English  poetry  reaches  a  somewhat  inexplicable  end. 
But  history  comes  to  the  rescue,  and  enables  us  still  to  trace 
the  scop.  It  is  in  the  guise  of  a  harp-player  that  Alfred  is 
reported  to  have  fooled  the  Danes,  and  Anlaf  in  his  turn  to 
have  fooled  the  Saxons  4 :  and  mythical  as  these  stories  may 
be,  they  would  not  have  even  been  plausible,  had  not  the 
presence  of  such  folk  by  the  camp-fire  been  a  natural  and 
common  event. 

Certainly  the  scop  survived  heathenism,  and  many  Christian 
bishops  and  pious  laymen,  such  as  Alfred  5,  were  not  ashamed 
of  their  sympathy  with  secular  song.  Nevertheless,  the  enter- 
tainers of  the  English  folk  did  not  find  favour  in  the  eyes  of 
the  Church  as  a  whole.  The  stricter  ecclesiastics  especially 
attacked  the  practice  of  harbouring  them  in  religious  houses. 
Decrees  condemning  this  were  made  by  the  council  on  English 
affairs  which  sat  at  Rome  in  679  6,  and  by  the  council  of 
Clovesho  in  747  7.    Bede,  writing  at  about  the  latter  date  on  the 

1  Grein,  i.  284.  A  similar  poem  book  was  a'Saxonicum  poematicae 
is  The  Sea-farer  (Grein,  i.  290).  artis  librum,'  and  'Saxonicos  libros 

2  Cynewulf,  Elene,  1259  (Grein,  recitareetmaximecarminaSaxonica 
ii.  135);  Riddle  lxxxix  (Grein,  iii.  memoriter  discere  non  desinebat.' 
J.  183).  But  A.  S.  Cook,  The  Christ  6  Haddan-Stubbs,  iii.  133 'Statui- 
(1900),  lv,  lxxxiii,  thinks  that  Cyne-  mus  atque  decernimus  ut  episcopi 
wulf  was  a  thane,  and  denies  him  vel  quicunque  ecclesiastici  ordinis 
the  Riddle.  religiosam  vitam  professi  sunt  .  .  . 

3  Cynewulf,  Christ  (ed.  Gollancz),  nee  citharoedas  habeant,  vel  quae- 
668  ;  Gifts  of  Men  (Grein,  iii.  1. 140);  cunque  symphoniaca,  nee  quoscun- 
Fates  of  Men  (Grein,  iii.  I.  148).  que  iocos  vel  ludos  ante  se  permit- 

*  William  of  Malmesbury,  Gesta  tant,   quia   omnia   haec   disciplina 

Reg.  Angl.  (R.  S.),  i.  126,  143.  sanctae  ecclesiae  sacerdotes  fideles 

Asserius,  de  rebus  gestis  A  If redi  suos  habere  non  sinit.' 

(Petrie-Sharp,  Mon.  Hist.  Brit.  i.  7  Ibid.    iii.    369    (can.    20)    '  ut 

473).    Alfred  was  slow  to  learn  as  a  monasteria  .  .  .  non   sint  ludicra- 

boy,  but  loved  '  Saxonica  poemata,'  rum   artium   receptacula,  hoc   est, 

and  remembered  them.     His  first  poetarum,    citharistarum,    musico- 


32 


MINSTRELSY 


condition  of  church  affairs  in  Northumbria  complains  of  those 
who  make  mirth  in  the  dwellings  of  bishops  * ;  and  the  com- 
plaint is  curiously  illustrated  by  a  letter  of  Gutbercht,  abbot 
of  Newcastle,  to  an  episcopal  friend  on  the  continent,  in  which 
he  asks  him  for  a  citharista  competent  to  play  upon  the  cithara 
or  rotta  which  he  already  possesses 2.  At  the  end  of  the  eighth 
century,  Alcuin  wrote  a  letter  to  Higbald,  bishop  of  Lindisfarne, 
warning  him  against  the  snares  of  citharistae  and  histriones  3 : 
and  some  two  hundred  years  later,  when -Edgar  and  Dunstan4 
were  setting  themselves  to  reform  the  religious  communities 
of  the  land,  the  favour  shown  to  such  ribald  folk  was  one  of 
the  abuses  which  called  for  correction 5.  This  hostile  attitude 
of  the  rulers  of  the  Church  is  not  quite  explained  by  anything 
in  the  poetry  of  the  scopas,  so  far  as  it  is  left  to  us.  This  had 
very  readily  exchanged  its  pagan  for  a  Christian  colouring:  it 
cannot  be  fairly  accused  of  immorality  or  even  coarseness,  and 


rum,  scurrorum.'  Can.  12  shows 
a  fear  of  the  influence  of  the  scop 
on  ritual :  'ut  presbyteri  saecularium 
poetarum  modo  in  ecclesia  non 
garriant,  ne  tragico  sono  sacrorum 
verborum  compositionem  et  dis- 
tinctionem  corrumpant  vel  con- 
fundant.'  Cf.  the  twelfth-century 
account  of  church  singers  who  used 
'  histrionicis  quibusdam  gestis,' 
quoted  by  Jusserand,i:.Z.  455,  from 
the  Speculum  Caritatis  of  Abbot 
./Elred  of  Rievaulx. 

1  Bede  to  Egbert  in  734  (Haddan- 
Stubbs,  iii.  315)  'de  quibusdam 
episcopis  fama  vulgatum  est  .  .  . 
quod  ipsi  .  .  .  secum  habeant  .  .  . 
illos  qui  risui,  iocis,  fabulis  .  . . 
subigantur.' 

2  Gutberchtus  to  Lullus  in  764 
(Diimmler,  Epist.  Mer.  et  Car.  in 
M.  G.  H.  i.  406). 

3  Alcuin,  Ep.  124  (797)  'melius 
est  pauperes  edere  de  mensa  tua 
quam  istriones  vel  luxuriosos  quos- 
libet  .  .  .  verba  Dei  legantur  in 
sacerdotali  convivio.  ibi  decet  lec- 
torem  audiri,  non  citharistam  ;  ser- 
mones  patrum,  non  carmina  gen- 
tium, quid  Hinieldus  cum  Christo  ? 
angusta  est  domus ;  utrosque  te- 
nere  non  poterit . . .  voces  legentium 


audire  in  domibus  tuis,  non  riden- 
tium  turbam  in  plateis.'  The  allu- 
sion to  a  lost  epic  cycle  of  Hiniel- 
dus (Ingeld)  is  highly  interesting; 
on  it  cf.  Haupt  in  Z.f  d.  A.  xv.  314. 

4  The  Vitae  of  Dunstan  (Stubbs, 
Memorials  of  Dunstan,  R.  S.  II,  20, 
80,  257)  record  that  he  himself 
learnt  the  'ars  citharizandi.'  One 
day  he  hung  '  citharam  suam  quam 
lingua  paterna  hearpam  vocamus ' 
on  the  wall,  and  it  discoursed  an 
anthem  by  itself.  Anthems,  doubt- 
less, were  his  mature  recreation,  but 
as  a  young  clerk  he  was  accused 
'  non  saluti  animae  profutura  sed 
avitae  gentilitatis  vanissima  didi- 
cisse  carmina,  et  historiarum  frivo- 
volas  colere  incantationum  nae- 
nias.' 

5  Anglo-Saxon  Canons  of  Edgar 
(906),  can.  58  (Wilkins,  i.  228),  sic 
Latine,  '  docemus  artem,  ut  nullus 
sacerdos  sit  cerevisarius,  nee  aliquo 
modo  scurram  agat  secum  ipso,  vel 
aliis  ' ;  Oratio  Edgari  Regis  (969) 
pro  monachatu  propaganda  (Wil- 
kins, i.  246)  '  ut  iam  domus  cleri- 
corum  putentur  .  .  .  conciliabulum 
histrionum  .  .  .  mimi  cantant  et  sal- 
tans' 


MIMUS  AND  SC6P  33 

the  Christian  sentiment  of  the  time  is  not  likely  to  have  been 
much  offended  by  the  prevailing  theme  of  battle  and  deeds  of 
blood.  The  probable  explanation  is  a  double  one.  There  is 
the  ascetic  tendency  to  regard  even  harmless  forms  of  secular 
amusement  as  barely  compatible  with  the  religious  life.  And 
there  is  the  fact,  which  the  language  of  the  prohibitions  them- 
selves makes  plain,  that  a  degeneration  of  the  old  Teutonic 
gleemen  had  set  in.  To  singing  and  harping  were  now  added 
novel  and  far  less  desirable  arts.  Certainly  the  prohibitions 
make  no  exception  for  poetae  and  musici ;  but  the  full  strength 
of  their  condemnation  seems  to  be  directed  against  scurrae  and 
their  ioca,  and  against  the  mimi  and  histriones  who  danced  as 
well  as  sang.  These  are  new  figures  in  English  life,  and  they 
point  to  the  fact  that  the  merging  of  the  Teutonic  with  the 
Latin  entertainer  had  begun.  To  some  extent,  the  Church 
itself  was  responsible  for  this.  The  conversion  of  England 
opened  the  remote  islands  to  Latin  civilization  in  general: 
and  it  is  not  to  be  wondered  at,  that  the  mimi,  no  less  than 
the  priests,  flocked  into  the  new  fields  of  enterprise.  If  this 
was  the  case  already  in  the  eighth  century,  we  can  hardly 
doubt  that  it  was  still  more  so  during  the  next  two  hundred 
years  of  which  the  literary  records  are  so  scanty.  Such 
a  view  is  supported  by  the  numerous  miniatures  of  dancers 
and  tumblers,  jugglers  and  bear-leaders,  in  both  Latin  and 
Early  English  manuscripts  of  this  period  \  and  by  the  glosses 
which  translate  such  terms  as  mtmus,  iocista,  scurra,  panto- 
mimus  by  gligmon,  reserving   scop  for  the  dignified  poeta'1. 

1  Strutt,  172  and  passim.  poet  is  opposed  to  the  skirnun  or 

2  Wright-Wiilker,  150,  311,  539.  tfimard,  scurra  or  mimus.  The 
A  synonym  for  scop  is  leodivyrhta.  buffoon  is  looked  askance  at  by  the 
On  188  lyricus  is  glossed  scop.  But  dignified  Scandinavian  men  of  let- 
the  distinctive  use  of  scop  is  not  ters  (Saxo  Grammaticus,  Hist. 
in  all  cases  maintained,  e.g.  tragi-  Datiica,  transl.  Elton,  vi.  186) ;  and 
cus  vel  comicus  unwurfi  scop  (188),  Keltic  bardism  stands  equally  aloof 
comicus  scop  (283),  comicus  id  est  from  the  c/erwr(d.p-  76).  Of  course 
qui  comedia  sen  bit,  can  tat  or  vel  Kelts  and  Teutons  might  conceiv- 
artifex  canticorum  seculorum,  idem  ably  have  developed  their  buffoons 
satyricus,  i.  scop,  ioculator,  poeta  for  themselves,  independently  of 
(206).  Other  western  peoples  in  Roman  influence,  but  so  far  as  the 
contact  with  Latin  civilization  came  Germans  go,  Tacitus,  Germ.  24, 
to  make  the  same  classification  of  knows  no  spectaculum  but  the 
poet  and  buffoon.  Wackernagel,  i.  sweorda-geldc  or  sword-dance  (ch. 
5 1 ,  says  that  the  German  liuderi  or  ix). 

CHAMBERS.    I  D 


34  MINSTRELSY 

This  distinction  I  regard  as  quite  a  late  one,  consequent 
upon  the  degeneracy  introduced  by  mimi  from  south  Europe 
into  the  lower  ranks  of  the  gleemen.  Some  writers,  indeed, 
think  that  it  existed  from  the  beginning,  and  that  the  scop 
was  always  the  resident  court  poet,  whereas  the  gleomon  was 
the  wandering  singer,  often  a  borrower  rather  than  a  maker  of 
songs,  who  appealed  to  the  smaller  folk1.  But  the  theory 
is  inconsistent  with  the  data  of  Widsith.  The  poet  there 
described  is  sometimes  a  wanderer,  sometimes  stationary. 
He  is  evidently  at  the  height  of  his  profession,  and  has  sung 
before  every  crowned  head  in  Europe,  but  he  calls  himself 
a  gleomon.  Nor  does  the  etymology  of  the  words  scop  and 
gleomon  suggest  any  vital  difference  of  signification  2. 

The  literary  records  of  the  continental  Teutons  are  far 
scantier  than  those  of  the  English.  But  amongst  them  also 
Latin  and  barbaric  traditions  seem  to  have  merged  in  the 
ioculator.  Ancestral  deeds  were  sung  to  the  harp,  and  there- 
fore, it  may  be  supposed,  by  a  scdp,  and  not  a  c/iorus,  before 
the  Ostrogoths  in  Italy,  at  the  beginning  of  the  sixth  century3. 
In  the  year  507  Clovis  the  Frank  sent  to  Theodoric  for 
a  citharoedus  trained  in  the  musical  science  of  the  South,  and 
Boethius  was  commissioned  to  make  the  selection  4.  On  the 
other  hand,  little  as  the  barbarians  loved  the  theatre,  the  mimi 
and  scurrae  of  the  conquered  lands  seem  to  have  tickled  their 
fancy  as  they  sat  over  their  wine.  At  the  banquet  with  which 
Attila  entertained  the  imperial  ambassadors  in  448,  the  guests 

1  Brooke,  i.  12  ;  Merbot,  n.  The  are  from  the  same  root  seg  (Kogel, 
gleomon,  according  to  Merbot,  be-  i.  I.  140).  Gleomon  is  from  gleo, 
came  mixed  with  the  plegman  or  gleow,  gliw,  glig  =  '  glee,'  '  mirth.' 
mimus.  In  the  glosses  pleja= ludus  The  harp,  in  Beowulf  and  elsewhere, 
in  the  widest  sense,  including  ath-  is  the  'glee-beam,'  'glee-wood.' 
letics;  and  plej-stowe  =  amphi-  3  Jordanis,  de  hist.  Get.  (in 
^m/rz*;«(Wright-Wiilker, 342).  A  M.G.H.),  c.  5  'ante  quos  etiam 
synonym  of  pleja  is  the  etymo-  cantu  maiorum  facta  modulatio- 
logical  equivalent  of  ludus,  lac  (cf.  nibus  citharisque  cantabant.' 

ch.  viii).     Spil  is  not  A.  S.,  sfiilian,  *  Cassiodorus,  Variae,  ii.  40,  41. 

a  loan-word  (Kogel,  i.  1.  11).  Kogel,  i.  1. 130,  thinks  that  the  pro- 

2  Scop,  the  O.  H.  G.  scop/ or  scof  fessional  singer,  as  distinct  from  the 
is  the  '  shaper,'  '  maker,'  from  ska-  chorus,  first  became  known  to  the 
pan,  'to  make';  it  is  only  a  West-  Franks  on  this  occasion.  But  one 
German  word,  and  is  distinct  from  may  rather  infer  from  Theodoric's 
scop/,  a  'scoff,'  'mock,'  and  also  letter  to  Boethius  that  the  citha- 
from  O.N.  skald.  This  is  not  West-  roedus  was  to  replace  barbaric  by 
German,  but  both  '  sing '  and  '  say '  civilized  music. 


MIMUS  AND  SC6P  35 

were  first  moved  to  martial  ardour  and  to  tears  by  the  recital 
of  ancient  deeds  of  prowess,  and  then  stirred  to  laughter  by 
the  antics  of  a  Scythian  and  a  Moorish  buffoon l.  Attila 
was  a  Hun  and  no  German  ;  but  the  Vandals  who  invaded 
Africa  in  429  are  recorded  to  have  taken  to  the  spcctacula  so 
extravagantly  popular  there  2,  and  Sidonius  tells  how  mimici 
sales,  chastened  in  view  of  barbaric  conceptions  of  decency, 
found  a  place  in  the  festivities  of  another  Theodoric,  king  from 
462  to  466  of  the  Visigoths  in  Gaul  3.  Three  centuries  later, 
under  Charlemagne,  the  blending  of  both  types  of  entertainer 
under  the  common  designation  of  iocidator  seems  to  be  .com- 
plete. And,  as  in  contemporary  England,  the  animosity  of 
the  Church  to  the  scenici  is  transferred  wholesale  to  the 
ioculatores,  without  much  formal  attempt  to  discriminate 
between  the  different  grades  of  the  profession.  Alcuin  may 
perhaps  be  taken  as  representing  the  position  of  the  more 
rigid  disciplinarians  on  this  point.  His  letter  to  the  English 
bishop,  Higbald,  does  not  stand  alone.  In  several  others  he 
warns  his  pupils  against  the  dangers  lurking  in  ludi  and 
spcctacula^,  and  he  shows  himself  particularly  exercised  by 

1  Priscus,  Hist.  Goth.  (ed.  Bonn)  feriatur.'  There  are  no  musicians, 
205  e'myevopevys  8e  eenrepas  Sq8es  'rege  solum  illis  fidibus  delenito, 
avj](p8r]crav,  860  8e  avriKpv  rov  'At-  quibus  non  minus  mulcet  virtus 
rrjXa  irapeXdovres  fiapfiapoi  qa-para  animum  quam  cantus  auditum.' 
TTenoirjptva  TXeyou,  pinas  avTov  Kal  ras  In  Carm.  xii  Sidonius  mentions 
Kara  noXepov  qSovres  operas'  es  ots  Gothic  songs,  without  specifying 
ol  rrjs  fvco^las  mrffikeirov,  na\  ot  pev  whether  they  are  professional  or 
TjSovro  rois  Troirjpaaiv,  ol  8e  ru>v  rroXe-  choric. 

pav  avapipvr)<jK6psvoi  8ir]ye'ipovTO  rols  4  Alcuin,  Ep.  eclxxxi  (793-804), 
(ppovTjpao-iv,  a'XAoi  Se  e'xupow  es  8d-  to  a  disciple  in  Italy,  'melius  est 
Kpva,  oiv  vn6  rov  xP°V0V  w@*v€l  T°  Deo  placere  quam  histrionibus,  pau- 
craipa  Kal  r)<rvxdCeiv  6  dvpos  rjvayKa-  perum  habere  curam  quam  mimo- 
£«to.  pera  be  to.  uapara  "2kv6t)s  tis  rum';  Ep.  ecl  (t8oi),  to  the  monks 
Tvape\6ujv  (ppevoffkafir]s, .  .  .  is  yeXara  of  Fulda,  '  non  sint  [adulescentuli] 
Trdvras  napea-Kevaae  napeXdelv.  ped'  luxuriosi,  non  ebrietati  servientes, 
bv  .  .  .  Zepaav  6  Mavpov<rios  .  .  .  ttuv-  non  contemptuosi,  non  inanes  se- 
ra? .  .  .  es  ao-fieo-Tov  opprjaai  yeXcora  quentes  ludos  '  ;  Ep.  ccxliv  (tSoi), 
7rap((TKevacre,  ttXtjv  'Att^Xo.  Cf.  Gib-  to  Fredegis,  master  of  the  palace 
bon,  iii.  440;  Hodgkin,  ii.  86;  school,  '  non  venlant  coronatae  co- 
Kogel,  i.  1.  114.  lumbae    ad    fenestras    tuas,    quae 

2  Procopius,  de  bell.  Vandal,  ii.  volant  per  cameras  palatii,  nee  equi 
6  ;  Victor  Vitensis,  de  persec.  Van-  indomiti  inrumpant  ostia  camerae  ; 
dal.  i.  15.  47.  nee    tibi    sit    ursorum    saltantium 

3  Sidonius,  Ep.  i.  2.  9  '  sane  in-  cura,  sed  clericorum  psallentium.' 
tromittuntur,  quanquam  raro,  inter  The  'coronatae  columbae'  were 
coenandum  mimici  sales,  ita  ut  nul-  Charlemagne's  wanton  daughters, 
lus  conviva  mordacis  linguae  felle  Dummler  {Ep.  Mer.  et  Car.  ii.  541) 

D  2 


36 


MINSTRELSY 


the  favour  which  they  found  with  Angilbert,  the  literary  and 
far  from  strict-lived  abbot  of  St.  Richer  K  The  influence 
of  Alcuin  with  Charlemagne  was  considerable,  and  so  far 
as  ecclesiastical  rule  went,  he  had  his  way.  A  capitulary 
(•f-787)  excluded  the  Italian  clergy  from  uncanonical  sports  2. 
In  789  bishops,  abbots,  and  abbesses  were  forbidden  to  keep 
ioculatoresz,  and  in  802  a  decree  applying  to  all  in  orders 
required  abstinence  from  idle  and  secular  amusements 4. 
These  prohibitions  were  confirmed  in  the  last  year  of  Charle- 
magne's reign  (813)  by  the  council  of  Tours5.  But  as  enter- 
tainers of  the  lay  folk,  the  minstrels  rather  gained  than  lost 
status  at  the  hands  of  Charlemagne.  Personally  he  took 
a  distinct  interest  in  their  performances.  He  treasured  up 
the  heroic  cantilenae  of  his  race 6,  and  attempted  in  vain  to 

prints  a  responsio  of  Leidradus, 
Abp.  of  Lyons,  to  Charles.  This  is 
interesting,  because  it  contrasts  the 
'mobilitas  histrionum' which  tempts 
the  eye,  with  the  'carmina  poetarum 
et  comediarum  mimorumque  urba- 
nitates  et  strophae,'  which  tempt 
the  ear.  This  looks  as  if  histriones, 
in  the  sense  of  pantomimic  were 
still  known,  but  the  piece  also  men- 
tions 'teatrorum  moles'  and  'cir- 
censes,'  and  is,  I  suspect,  quite 
antiquarian. 

1  Ep.  clxxv  (799),  to  Adalhart, 
Bp.  of  Old  Corbey,  'Vereor,  ne 
Homerus  [Angilbert]  irascatur  con- 
tra cartam  prohibentem  spectacula 
et  diabolica  figmenta.  quae  omnes 
sanctae  scripturae  prohibent,  in 
tantum  ut  legebam  sanctum  dicere 
Augustinum,  "  nescit  homo,  qui  hi- 
striones et  mimos  et  saltatores  in- 
troducit  in  domum  suam,  quam 
magna  eos  immundorum  sequitur 
turba  spirituum."  sed  absit  ut  in 
domo  Christiana  diabolus  habeat 
potestatem '  (the  quotation  from 
Augustine  cannot  be  identified) : 
Ep.  ccxxxvii  (801),  also  to  Adalhart, 
'  quod  deemendatis  moribus  Homeri 
mei  scripsisti,  satis  placuit  oculis 
meis  .  .  .  unum  fuit  de  histrionibus, 
quorum  vanitatibus  sciebam  non 
parvum  animae  sui  periculum  im- 
minere,  quod  mihi  non  placuit,  .  .  . 
mirumque  mihi  visum  est,  quomodo 


tarn  sapiens  animus  non  intellexisset 
reprehensibilia  dignitati  suae  facere 
et  non  laudabilia.'  Angilbert  also 
seems  to  have  had  relations  unbe- 
coming an  abbot  with  one  of  the 
'  coronatae  columbae.' 

2  Capit.  of  Mantua  (Boretius,  i. 
195),  can.  6  'neque  ulla  iocorum 
genera  ante  se  fieri  permittant  quae 
contra  canonum  auctoritatem  eve- 
niunt.' 

3  Capit.  Generate  (Boretius,  i.  64  ; 
P.  L.  xcvii.  188),  c.  31  '  ut  episcopi 
et  abbates  et  abbatissae  cupplas 
canum  non  habeant,  nee  falcones, 
nee  accipitres,  nee  ioculatores.'  If 
this  is  the  carta  of  Alcuin's  Ep. 
clxxv,  and  I  know  of  no  other  which 
it  can  be,  Diimmler's  date  for  the 
letter  of  799  seems  too  late.  Mabil- 
lon's  791  is  nearer  the  mark. 

4  Capit.  Gen.  (Boretius,  i.  96), 
can.  23  'cleri . . .  non  inanis  lusibus 
vel  conviviis  secularibus  vel  canticis 
vel  luxuriosis  usum  habeant.' 

5  Cone,  of  Tours  (Mansi,  xiv.  84), 
c.  7  '  histrionum  quoque  turpium  et 
obscoenorum  insolentiis  iocorum  et 
ipsi  [sacerdotes]  animo  effugere 
caeterisque  sacerdotibus  effugienda 
praedicare  debent.' 

6  Einhard,  Vita  Caroli  Magni, 
c.  29  '  barbara  et  antiquissima  car- 
mina, quibus  veterum  regum  actus 
et  bella  canebantur,  scripsit  me- 
moriaeque  mandavit.' 


MIMUS  AND  SCOP 


37 


inspire  the  saevitia  of  his  sons  with  his  own  enthusiasm  for 
these  \  The  chroniclers  more  than  once  relate  how  his 
policy  was  shaped  or  modified  by  the  chance  words  of  a  iocu- 
lator  or  scurra  2.  The  later  tradition  of  the  jongleurs  looked 
back  to  him  as  the  great  patron  of  their  order,  who  had  given 
them  all  the  fair  land  of  Provence  in  fee  3 :  and  it  is  clear  that 
the  songs  written  at  his  court  form  the  basis  not  only  of  the 
chansons  de  gestes,  but  also,  as  we  found  to  be  the  case  with 
the  English  war-songs,  of  many  passages  in  the  chronicles 
themselves4.  After  Charlemagne's  death  the  minstrels  fell 
for  a  time  on  evil  days.  Louis  the  Pious  by  no  means  shared 
his  father's  love  for  them.  He  attempted  to  suppress  the 
cantilenae  on  which  he  had  been  brought  up,  and  when  the 
mimi  jested  at  court  would  turn  away  his  head  and  refuse  to 
smile 5.  To  his  reign  may  perhaps  be  ascribed  a  decree 
contained  in  the  somewhat  dubious  collection  of  Benedictus 
Levita,  forbidding  idle  dances,  songs  and  tales  in  public  places 
and  at  crossways  on  Sundays 6,  and  another  which  continued 


1  Alcuin,  Ep.  cxlix  (798),  to  Char- 
lemagne, '  ut  puerorum  saevitia  ves- 
trorum  cuiuslibet  carminis  dulcedine 
mitigaretur,  voluistis ' ;  Alcuin,  who 
doubtless  had  to  manager  Charle- 
magne a  little,  is  apparently  to  write 
the  poem  himself. 

2  Kogel,  i.  2.  222.  The  Chroni- 
con  Novaliciense,  iii.  10,  describes 
how  after  crossing  Mt.  Cenis  in  773, 
Charlemagne  was  guided  by  a  Lom- 
bard ioculator  who  sung  a '  cantiun- 
culam  a  se  compositam  de  eadem 
re  rotando  in  conspectu  suorum.' 
As  a  reward  the  ioculator  had  all  the 
land  over  which  his  tuba  sounded  on 
a  hill  could  be  heard.  The  Mona- 
chus  S.  Calli  ( JarFe",  Bibl.  rer.  Germ. 
iv),  i.  13,  tells  how  ^783)  a  scurra 
brought  about  a  reconciliation  be- 
tween Charlemagne  and  his  brother- 
in-law  Uodalrich.  The  same  writer 
(i.  33)  mentions  an  '  incomparabilis 
clericus '  of  the  '  gloriosissimus  Ka- 
rolus,'  who  '  scientia  .  .  .  cantilenae 
ecclesiasticae  vel  iocularis  novaque 
carminum  compositione  sive  modu- 
latione  .  . .  cunctos  praecelleret.' 

3  Philippe    Mouskes,   de   Poetis 


Provincialibus   (quoted    Ducange, 
s.  v.  leccator) : 
1  Quar  quant  li  buens  Rois  Karle- 
maigne 
Ot  toute  mise  a  son  demaine 
Provence,  qui  mult  iert  plentive 
De  vins,  de  bois,  d'aigue,  de  rive, 
As  lecours,  as  menestreus, 
Qui  sont  auques  luxurieus, 
Le  donna  toute  et  departi.' 
*  Kogel,  i.  2.  220. 
6  Theganus, de  gesiisLudoviciPii 
(M.  G.  H.  Scriptores,  ii.  594),  c.  19 
'  Poetica  carmina  gentilia,  quae  in 
iuventute    didicerat,    respuit,    nee 
legere  nee  audire  nee  docere  voluit,' 
and   '  nunquam    in    risu    exaltavit 
vocem  suam,  nee  quando  in  festivi- 
tatibus  ad  laetitiam  populi  proce- 
debant  thymelici,  scurrae,  et  mimi 
cum  choraulis  et  citharistis  ad  men- 
sam  coram  eo,  tunc  ad  mensuram 
ridebat  populus  coram  eo,  ille  nun- 
quam vel  denies  candidos  suos  in 
risu  ostendit.'     The  'carmina  gen- 
tilia,' so  much  disliked  by  Louis, 
were  probably  Frankish   and   not 
classic  poems. 
6  Benedictus     Levita,     vi.     205 


38 


MINSTRELSY 


for  the  benefit  of  the  minstrels  the  legal  incapacity  of  the 
Roman  sccnici,  and  excluded  histriones  and  scurrae  from  all 
privilege  of  pleading  in  courts  of  justice  1. 

The  ill-will  of  a  Louis  the  Pious  could  hardly  affect  the  hold 
which  the  minstrels  had  established  on  society.  For  good  or 
for  bad,  they  were  part  of  the  mediaeval  order  of  things.  But 
their  popularity  had  to  maintain  itself  against  an  undying 
ecclesiastical  prejudice.  They  had  succeeded  irrevocably  to  the 
heritage  of  hate  handed  down  from  the  scenici  infantes.  To  be 
present  at  their  performances  was  a  sin  in  a  clerk,  and  merely 
tolerated  in  a  layman.  Largesse  to  them  was  declared  tanta- 
mount to  robbery  of  the  poor2.  It  may  be  fairly  said  that 
until  the  eleventh  century  at  least  the  history  of  minstrelsy  is 
written  in  the  attacks  of  ecclesiastical  legislators,  and  in  the 
exultant  notices  of  monkish  chroniclers  when  this  or  that 
monarch  was  austere  enough  to  follow  the  example  of  Louis 
the  Pious,  and  let  the  men  of  sin  go  empty  away  3.  Through- 
out the' Middle  Ages  proper  the  same  standpoint  was  officially 
maintained4.     The  canon  law,  as  codified  by  Gratian,  treats 


(M.  G.  H.  Leges,  ii.  2.  83), '  ne  in  illo 
sancto  die  vanis  fabulis  aut  locu- 
tionibus  sive  cantationibus  vel  sal- 
tationibus  stando  in  biviis  et  plateis 
ut  solet  inserviant.'  On  this  collec- 
tion see  Schaff,  v.  272. 

1  This  capitulary  is  of  doubtful 
date,  but  belongs  to  the  reign  either 
of  Louis  the  Pious,  or  Lothair 
(Boretius,  i.  334 ;  Pertz,  i.  324  ;  Ben. 
Levita,  ii.  49)  '  ut  in  palatiis  nostris 
ad  accusandum  et  iudicandum  et 
testimonium  faciendum  non  se  ex- 
hibeant  viles  personae  et  infames, 
histriones  scilicet,  nugatores,  man- 
zeres,  scurrae,  concubinarii,  .  .  .  aut 
servi  aut  criminosi ' ;  cf.  R.  Sohm, 
Die  frank.  Reichs-  und  Gerichts- 
verfassung,  354. 

2  For  ninth-century  prohibitions 
see  Statutes  of  Haito,  Bp.  of  Basle 
(807-23),  c.  11  (Boretius,  i.  364); 
Cone,  of  Maints  (847),  c.  13  (Bore- 
tius, ii.  179) ;  Cone.  ofMaintz  (852), 
c.  6  (Boretius,  ii.  187);  Capit. 
of  Walter  of  Orleans  (858),  c.  17 
(Mansi,  xv.  507),  Capit.  of  Hincmar 


of  Rheims  (P.  L.  exxv.  776) ;  and 
cf.  Prynne,  556.  Stress  is  often  laid 
on  the  claims  of  the  poor ;  e.  g. 
Agobardus  (t836),  de  Dispens.  Ec- 
cles.  Rer.  30  (P.  L.  civ.  249)  '  satiat 
praeterea  et  inebriat  histriones, 
mimos,  turpissimosque  et  vanis- 
simos  ioculares,  cum  pauperes 
ecclesiae  fame  discruciati  inter- 
eant.' 

3  Otto  Frisingensis,  Chronicon,  vi. 
32,  records  of  the  Emperor  Henry 
III  in  1045  that  '  quumque  ex  more 
regio  nuptias  Inglinheim  celebraret, 
omne  balatronum  et  histrionum 
collegium,  quod,  ut  assolet,  eo  con- 
fluxerat,  vacuum  abire  permisit, 
pauperibusque  ea  quae  membris 
diaboli  subtraxerat,  large  distribuit.' 
After  the  deathof  the  EmperorHenry 
I  of  Germany  his  widow  Matilda 
1  neminem  voluit  audire  carmina  sae- 
cularia  cantantem'(  VitaMachtildis 
Antiquior  in  M.G.H.  Seriptores, 
iv.  294). 

4  Honorius  Augustodunensis, 
Elucidarium  (I-1092),  ii.  18  (P.  L. 


MIMUS  AND  SCOP 


39 


as  applicable  to  minstrels  the  pronouncements  of  fathers  and 
councils  against  the  scenici,  and  adds  to  them  others  more 
recent,  in  which  clergy  who  attend  spectaada,  or  in  any  way 
by  word  or  deed  play  the  ioadator,  are  uncompromisingly 
condemned  ].  This  temper  of  the  Church  did  not  fail  to  find 
its  expression  in  post-Conquest  England.  The  -council  of 
Oxford  in  1222  adopted  for  this  country  the  restatement  of 
the  traditional  rule  by  the  Lateran  council  of  12152;  and  the 
stricter  disciplinary  authorities  at  least  attempted  to  enforce 
the  decision.  Bishop  Grosseteste  of  Lincoln,  for  instance, 
pressed  it  upon  his  clergy  in  or  about  1238  3.  The  reforming 
provisions  of  Oxford  in  1259  laid  down  that,  although  minstrels 
might  receive  charitable  doles  in  monasteries,  their  spcctaada 
must  not  be  given  4  ;  and  a  similar  prohibition,  couched  in  very 


clxxii.  1 148)  '  Habent  spem  iocu- 
latores  ?  nullam  ;  tota  namque  in- 
tentione  sunt  ministri  Satanae ' ;  on 
the  vogue  of  this  book  cf.  Furnivall 
Miscellany,  88. 

1  The  following  passages  of  the 
Decretum  Gratiani,  besides  those 
already  quoted,  bear  on  the  subject : 
(a)  i.  23.  3,  ex  Jsid.de  Eccl.  Officiis, 
ii.  2  '  His  igitur  lege  Patrum 
cavetur,  ut  a  vulgari  vita  seclusi 
a  mundi  voluptatibus  sese  absti- 
neant ;  non  spectaculis,  non  pom- 
pis  intersint' :  (b)  i.  44.  7,  ex  Cone. 
Nannetensi  'Nullus  presbyterorum 
.  .  .  quando  ad  collectam  presbyteri 
convenerit  .  .  .  plausus  et  risus  in- 
conditos,et  fabulas  inanes  ibi  referre 
aut  cantare  praesumat,  aut  turpia 
iocavel  ursovel  tornatricibus  ante  se 
fieri  patiatur';  I  cannot  identify  the 
Council  of  Nantes  referred  to  :  the 
canon  is  not  amongst  those  supposed 
to  belong  to  the  Council  of  660,  and 
given  by  Mansi,  xviii.  166  :  (c)  i.  46. 
6,  ex  Cone.  Carthag.  iv.  c.  60  [398. 
Mansi,  iii.  956]  '  Clericum  scur- 
rilem  et  verbis  turpibus  ioculatorem 
ab  officio  retrahendum  censemus  ' : 
(d)  ii.  4.  1.  1,  ex  Cone.  Carthag.  vii 
(419)  'Omnes  etiam  infamiae  macu- 
lis  aspersi,  id  est  histriones  .  .  .  ab 
accusatione  prohibentur.'  The 
Decretum  Gratiani  was  drawn  up 
+  1 1 39.  The  Decretales  of  Gregory 
IX  (1234)   incorporate  can.   16  of 


the  Lateran  Council  (Mansi,  xxii. 
1003),  held  in  121 5  {Deer.  Greg. 
IX,  iii.  1.  15)  '  [Clerici]  mimis, 
ioculatoribus,  et  .  histrionibus  non 
intendant ' ;  and  the  Liber  Sextus 
of  Boniface  VIII  (1298)  adds  the 
following  decree  of  that  Pope  (Sext. 
Deer.  iii.  1.  1)  '  Clerici  qui,  clericalis 
ordinis  dignitati  non  modicum  de- 
trahentes,  se  ioculatores  seu  goliar- 
dos  faciunt  aut  bufones,  si  per  annum 
artem  illam  ignominiosam  exer- 
cuerint,  ipso  iure,  si  autem  tempore 
breviori,  et  tertio  moniti  non  resi- 
puerint,  careant  omni  privilegio 
clericali.' 

2  Wilkins,  i.  5S5.  For  can.  16 
of  the  Lateran  council  see  last 
note.  The  prohibition  is  again 
confirmed  by  can.  17  of  the  Synod 
of  Exeter  in  1287  (Wilkins,  ii.  129). 

3  Constitutions  of  Bp.  Grosse- 
teste in  his  Epistolae  (R.  S.),  159 
1  ne  mimis,  ioculatoribus,  aut  histrio- 
nibus intendant.'  In  1230,  Grosse- 
teste's  predecessor,  Hugh  of  Wells, 
had  bid  his  archdeacons  inquire, 
'an  aliqui  intendant  histrionibus' 
(Wilkins,  i.  627). 

4  Annates  de  Burton  (Ann. 
Monast.  R.  S.  i.  485)  '  histrionibus 
potest  dari  cibus,  quia  pauperes 
sunt,  non  quia  histriones ;  et  eorum 
ludi  non  videantur,  vel  audiantur, 
vel  permittantur  fieri  coram  abbate 
vel  monachis.' 


40 


MINSTRELSY 


uncomplimentary  terms,  finds  a  place  in  the  new  statutes 
drawn  up  in  131 9  for  the  cathedral  church  of  Sarum  by  Roger 
de  Mortival  1.  A  few  years  later  the  statutes  of  St.  Albans 
follow  suit2,  while  in  131 2  a  charge  of  breaking  the  canons  in 
this  respect  brought  against  the  minor  clergy  of  Ripon  minster 
had  formed  the  subject  of  an  inquiry  by  Archbishop  Green- 
field 3.  Such  notices  might  be  multiplied  4  ;  and  the  tenor  of 
them  is  echoed  in  the  treatises  of  the  more  strait-laced  amongst 
monkish  writers.  John  of  Salisbury  5,  William  Fitz  Stephen  6, 
Robert  Mannyng  of  Brunne7,  are  at  one  in  their  disapproval 
of  ioculatores.  As  the  fourteenth  century  draws  to  its  close, 
and  the  Wyclifite  spirit  gets  abroad,  the  freer  critics  of  church 


1  Const,  of  Roger  de  Mortival, 
§  46  (Dayman  and  Jones,  Sarum 
Statutes,  76)  '  licet  robustos  cor- 
pore,  laborem  ad  quern  homo  nasci- 
tur  subire  contemnentes,  et  in 
delicato  otio  sibi  victum  quaerere 
sub  inepta  laetitia  saeculi  eligentes, 
qui  "  menestralli "  et  quandoque 
"ludorum  homines"  vulgari  eloquio 
nuncupantur,  non  quia  tales  sunt, 
sed  quia  opus  Dei  nostramque 
naturam  conspicimus  in  eisdem, 
nostris  domibus  refectionis  gratia 
aliquotiens  toleremus,'  yet  no  money 
or  goods  convertible  into  money 
may  be  given  them ;  'nee  ad  fabulas 
quas  referunt,  et  quae  in  detracta- 
tionibus,  turpiloquio,  scurrilitate 
consistunt,  ullus  voluntarium  prae- 
beat  auditum,  nee  ad  eas  audiendas 
aures  habeat  prurientes,  sed  per 
obauditionem  ab  huiusmodi  re- 
latibus,  quin  potius  iatratibus,  in 
quantum  fieri  poterit,  excludantur, 
tamen  nemo  libenter  invito  referat 
auditori.'  They  may,  if  they  are  not 
women,  have  their  dole  of  bread, 
and  keep  peace  from  evil  words. 
'  Nee  debet  de  huiusmodi  persona- 
rum,  quae  infames  sunt,  laude, 
immo  verius  fraude,  seu  obloquio, 
aut  alias  vanae  laudis  praeconio, 
ecclesiasticus  vir  curare,  cum  nihil 
eo  miserius  sit  praelato,  qui  luporum 
laudibus  gloriatur.'  The  statute  is 
headed '  De  maledicis,  adulatoribus, 
histrionibus,  et  detractoribus  re- 
spuendis.' 


2  Thomas  Walsingham,  Gesta 
Abbatum  S.  Albani  (ed.  Riley, 
R.  S.  ii.  469)  '  illicita  spectacula 
prorsus  evitent '  (1326-35). 

8  J.  T.  Fowler,  Memorials  of 
Ripon  Minster,  ii.  68  (Surtees  Soc.) ; 
the  charge  was  that  '  vicarii,  capel- 
lani,  et  caeteri  ministri  .  .  .  specta- 
culis  publicis,  ludibriis  et  coreis, 
immo  teatricalibus  ludis  inter  laicos 
frequentius  se  immiscent.' 

*  The  Statutes,  i.  5. 4,of  St.  Paul's, 
as  late  as  ti4So,  direct  the  beadles 
'  quod  menestrallos  coram  altaribus 
Virginis  et  Crucis  indevote  strepi- 
tantes  arceant  et  eiiciant'  (W.  S. 
Simpson,  Register  of  St.  Paul's, 
72). 

6  John  of  Salisbury,  Polycraticus 
(t  1 159),  i.  8  {P.L.  excix.  406)  'satius 
enim  fuerat  otiari  quam  turpiter 
occupari.  Hinc  mimi,  salii  vel 
saliares,  balatrones,  aemiliani, 
gladiatores,  palaestritae,  gignadii, 
praestigiatores,  malefici  quoque 
multi,  et  tota  ioculatorum  scena 
procedit.' 

6  Cf.  Representations,  s.v.  Lon- 
don. 

7  R.  Mannyng  de  Brunne  (t  1 303), 
Handlyng  Synne  (ed.  Furnivall), 
148.  '  Here  doyng  ys  ful  perylous ' 
he  translates  William  of  Wadington's 
'  Qe  unt  trop  perilus  mester  '  ;  and 
tells  a  tale  of  divine  judgement  on 
'a  mynstralle,  a  gulardous,'  who 
disturbed  a  priest  at  mass. 


MIMUS  AND  SCOP  41 

and  state,  such  as  William  Langland  *  or  the  imagined  author 
of  Chaucer's  Parsons  Tale2,  take  up  the  same  argument. 
And  they  in  their  turn  hand  it  on  to  the  interminable  pam- 
phleteering of  the  Calvinistic  Puritans  3. 

1  Piers  the  Plowman,   C.  text,  whiche     beth     godes     myn- 

viii.  97 :  strales.' 

'  Clerkus     and     knyjtes  '  wel-  2  Cant.  Tales  (ed.   Skeat),  §  69 

cometh  kynges  mynstrales,  '  Soothly,  what  thing  that  he  yeveth 

And  for  loue  of  here  lordes  *  for  veyne  glorie,  as  to  minstrals  and 

lithen  hem  at  festes  ;  to  folk,  for  to  beren  his  renoun  in  the 

Muchemore,methenketh*riche  world,  he  hath  sinne  ther-of,  and 

men  auhte  noon  almesse.' 

Haue    beggars    by-fore    hem*  3  e.  g.  Stubbes,  Anatomy,  i.  169. 


CHAPTER  III 

THE  MINSTREL  LIFE 

The  perpetual  infamia  of  the  minstrels  is  variously  reflected 
in  the  literature  of  their  production.  Sometimes  they  take 
their  condemnation  lightly  enough,  dismissing  it  with  a  jest  or 
a  touch  of  bravado.  In  Aucassin  et  Nicolete,  that  marvellous 
romance  of  the  viel  caitif,  when  the  hero  is  warned  that  if  he 
takes  a  mistress  he  must  go  to  hell,  he  replies  that,  to  hell  will 
he  go,  for  thither  go  all  the  goodly  things  of  the  world. 
'  Thither  go  the  gold  and  the  silver,  and  the  vair  and  the  grey, 
and  thither  too  go  harpers  and  minstrels  and  the  kings  of  the 
•world.  With  these  will  I  go,  so  that  I  have  Nicolete,  my 
most  sweet  friend,  with  me ' 1.  At  other  times  they  show 
a  wistful  sense  of  the  pathos  of  their  secular  lot.  They  tell 
little  stories  in  which  heaven  proves  more  merciful  than  the 
vice-gerents  of  heaven  upon  earth,  and  Virgin  or  saint 
bestows  upon  a  minstrel  the  sign  of  grace  which  the  priest 
denies2.     But  often,  again,  they  turn  upon  their  persecutors 

1  Aucassin  et  Nicolete  (+1150-  Coincy),  Miracles  de  Nostre  Dame 
1200),  ed.  Bourdillon  (1897),  22.  (t  1223,  ed.  Poquet,  1859),  and  Le 
The  term  '  caitif  has  puzzled  the  Harpeor  de  Roncestre  (Michel, 
editors.  Surely  the  minstrel  has  in  Roms.,  Contes,  Dits,  Fabl.  ii.  108). 
mind  the  abusive  epithets  with  Saint  Pierre  et  le  Jongleicr  (Mon- 
which  the  clergy  bespattered  his  taiglon  Raynaud,  v.  117)  is  a  witty 
profession.     See  Appendix  B.  tale,  in   which  a  minstrel,  left   in 

2  See  especially  Le  Tombeor  de  charge  of  hell,  loses  so  many  souls  to 
Notre  Dame  {Romania,  ii.  315).  St.  Peter  at  dice,  that  no  minstrel 
Movati  (Rom.  xxv.  591)  refers  to  a  has  been  allowed  there  since.  B. 
passage  quoted  by  Augustine,  de  Joannes  Bonus  (Acta  SS.  Oct. 
Civ.  Dei,  vi.  10,  from  the  lost  work  ix.  693)  was  a  minstrel  in  his  youth, 
of  Seneca,  de  Superstitionibus ,  but  the  patron  saints  of  the  min- 
i  doctus  archimimus,  senex  iam  de-  strels  were  always  St.  Genesius  the 
crepitus,  cotidie  in  Capitoliomimum  mime  (cf.  p.  10),  and  St.  Julian 
agebat,  quasi  dii  libenter  spectarent  Hospitator  (Acta  SS.Jan.  iii.  589), 
quern  illi  homines  desierant.'  Some-  who  built  a  hospital  and  once  en- 
what  similar  are  Don  Cierge  qui  tertained  an  angel  unawares. 
descendi  au  Jottgleour  (Gautier  de 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  43 

and  rend  them  with  the  merciless  satire  of  the  fabliaux,  wherein 
it  is  the  clerk,  the  theologian,  who  is  eternally  called  upon  to 
play  the  indecent  or  ridiculous  part  *. 

Under  spiritual  disabilities  the  minstrels  may  have  been,  but 
so  far  as  substantial  popularity  amongst  all  classes  went,  they 
had  no  cause  from  the  eleventh  to  the  fourteenth  century  to 
envy  the  monks.  As  a  social  and  literary  force  they  figure 
largely  both  on  the  continent  and  in  England.  The  distinc- 
tively Anglo-Saxon  types  of  scop  and  glcomon  of  course  dis- 
appear at  the  Conquest.  They  do  not  cease  to  exist;  but  they 
go  under  ground,  singing  their  defiant  lays  of  Hereward  2 ;  and 
they  pursue  a  more  or  less  subterranean  career  until  the  four- 
teenth century  brings  the  English  tongue  to  its  own  again. 
But  minstrelsy  was  no  less  popular  with  the  invaders  than 
with  the  invaded.  Whether  the  skald  had  yet  developed 
amongst  the  Scandinavian  pirates  who  landed  with  Rollo  on 
the  coasts  of  France  may  perhaps  be  left  undetermined  3 :  for 
a  century  and  a  half  had  sufficed  to  turn  the  Northmen  into 
Norman  French,  and  with  the  other  elements  of  the  borrowed 
civilization  had  certainly  come  the  ioculator.  In  the  very  van 
of  William's  army  at  Senlac  strutted  the  minstrel  Taillefer, 
and  went  to  his  death  exercising  the  double  arts  of  his  hybrid 
profession,  juggling  with  his  sword,  and  chanting  an  heroic 
lay  of  Roncesvalles  4.  Twenty  years  later,  Domesday  Book 
records  how  Berdic  the  ioculator  regis  held  three  vills  and 
five  carucates  of  land  in  Gloucestershire,  and  how  in  Hamp- 


2 


1  Paris,  113  ;  Bldier,  333.  4  Guy  of  Amiens,  de  Bello  Hastin- 

2  Brooke,  Eng.    Lit.    305;    Ten  gensi  (t  1068),  391,  399  : 

Brink,  i.  149.  '  Histrio,  cor  audax  nimium  quern 

8  Sophus   Bugge,    in  Bidrag  til  nobilitabat .  .  . 

den  aeldste  Skaldedigtni?igs    His-  .  .  .  Incisor-ferri  mimuscogno- 

torie   (1894;  cf.  L.  Duvau   in  Rev.  mine  dictus.' 

Celt.  xvii.  113),  holds  that  Skaldic  Wace,   Roman  de  Rou   (tii7o) 

poetry  began  in  the  Viking  raids  of  (ed.  Andresen,  iii.  8035) : 

the  eighth  and  ninth  centuries,  under  '  Taillefer,  ki  mult  bien  chantout, 

the  influence  of  the  Irish  f/id.   The  Sor  un  cheval  ki  tost  alout, 

tenth-century  skald  as  described  in  Devant  le  due  alout  chantant 

the  Raven-Song  of  Hornklon  at  the  De  Karlemaigne  et  de  Rolant 

court   of  Harold  Fair-hair  is  very  Et  d'Oliver  et  des  vassals 

like  the  scop  (C.B.  B.  i.  254),   and  Qui  morurent  en  Rencevals.' 

here  too  tumblers  and  buffoons  have  Cf.  Freeman,  Norman   Conquest, 

found  their  way.    Cf.  Kogel,  i.  I.  Ill ;  iii.  477. 
E.  Mogk,  in  Paul,  Grundriss 2,  iii.  248. 


44  MINSTRELSY 

shire  Adelinda,  a  ioculatrix,  held  a  virgate,  which  Earl  Roger 
had  given  her  *.  During  the  reigns  of  the  Angevin  and  Plan- 
tagenet  kings  the  minstrels  were  ubiquitous.  They  wandered 
at  their  will  from  castle  to  castle,  and  in  time  from  borough 
to  borough,  sure  of  their  ready  welcome  alike  in  the  village 
tavern,  the  guildhall,  and  the  baron's  keep  2.  They  sang  and 
jested  in  the  market-places,  stopping  cunningly  at  a  critical 
moment  in  the  performance,  to  gather  their  harvest  of  small 
coin  from  the  bystanders3.  In  the  great  castles,  while  lords 
and  ladies  supped  or  sat  around  the  fire,  it  was  theirs  to  while 
away  many  a  long  bookless  evening  with  courtly  geste  or  witty 
sally.  At  wedding  or  betrothal,  baptism  or  knight-dubbing, 
treaty  or  tournament,  their  presence  was  indispensable.  The 
greater  festivities  saw  them  literally  in  their  hundreds4,  and 
rich  was  their  reward  in  money  and  in  jewels,  in  costly  gar- 
ments 5,  and  in  broad  acres.  They  were  licensed  vagabonds, 
with  free  right  of  entry  into  the  presence-chambers  of  the 
land6.  You  might  know  them  from  afar  by  their  coats  of 
many  colours,  gaudier  than  any  knight  might  respectably 
wear 7,  by  the  instruments  upon  their  backs  and  those  of  their 

1  Domesday  Book,  Gloc.l.  162  ;  pro  quibus  forsan  viginti  vel  triginta 
Hants,  f.  38  (b).  Before  the  Con-  marcas  argenti  consumpserant,  vix 
quest,  not  to  speak  of  Widsith  revoltftis  septem  diebus,  histrioni- 
and  Deor,  Edmund  Ironside  had  bus,  ministris  scilicet  diaboli,  ad 
given     the      hills     of     Chartham  primam  vocem  dedisse.' 

and   Walworth  'cuidam  ioculatori  6  The  Annales  (1"i33o)  of  Johannes 

suo    nomine     Hitardo'    (Somner-  de  Trokelowe  (R.  S.),  98,  tell  s.a. 

Battely,  Antiq.  of Canterbury,  app.  13 17,  how  when   Edward   II   was 

39).      Hitardus,    wishing    to    visit  keeping  Pentecost  in  Westminster 

Rome,  gave  it  to   Christ   Church,  '  quaedam  mulier,  ornatu  histrionali 

Canterbury.  redimita,  equum  bonum,  histrionali- 

2  Bernhard,  iii.  378,  gives  a  thir-  ter  phaleratum,  ascensa,  dictam 
teenth  -  century  regulation  for  the  aulam  intravit,  mensas  more  hi- 
Petit  Pont  entry  of  Paris  :  '  Et  ausi  strionum  circuivit.'  She  rode  to  the 
tot  li  jougleur  sunt  quite  por  i  ver  king,  placed  an  insulting  letter  in 
de  chancon.'  his  hands,  and  retired.    The  '  iani- 

3  Gautier,  ii.  124.  tores   et   hostiarii,'  when    blamed, 

4  There  were  426  at  the  wedding  declared  '  non  esse  moris  regii,  ali- 
of  Margaret  of  England  with  John  cui  menestrallo,  palatium  intrare 
of  Brabant  in  1290  (Chappell,  i.  15,  volenti,  in  tanta  solemnitate  aditum 
from  Wardrobe  Bk.  18  Edw.  I).  denegare  ' ;  cf.  Walsingham,  Hist. 

6  Rigordus,    de   gestis    Philippi  Angl.  (R.  S.).  i.  149. 

Augusti  (1186)  'vidimus  quondam  7  Strutt,  189,  has  a  fourteenth- 

quosdam  principes  qui  vestes   diu  century  story  of  a  youth  rebuked  for 

excogitatas  et  variis  riorum  pictura-  coming  to  a  feast  in  a  coat  bardy, 

tionibus  artificiossisimis  elaboratas,  cut  German  fashion  like  a  minstrel's; 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  45 

servants,  and  by  the  shaven  faces,  close-clipped  hair  and  flat 
shoes  proper  to  their  profession  l.     This  kenspeckle  appear- 
ance, together  with  the  privilege  of  easy  access,  made  the 
minstrel's  dress  a  favourite  disguise  in  ages  when  disguise  was 
often  imperative.     The  device  attributed  by  the  chroniclers  to 
Alfred  and  to  Anlaf  becomes  in  the  romances  one  of  the  com- 
monest of  click h2-.     The  readiness  with  which  the  minstrels 
won  the  popular  ear  made  them  a  power  in  the  land.     William 
de   Longchamp,    the   little-loved    chancellor    of    Richard    I, 
found  it  worth  his  while  to  bring  a  number  of  them  over 
from  France,  that  they  might  sing  his  praises  abroad  in  the 
public  places  3.     Nor  were  they  less  in  request  for  satire  than 
for  eulogy.     The   English  speaking   minstrels,  in  particular, 
were   responsible  for  many  songs  in  derision  of  unpopular 
causes  and  personalities4  ;  and  we  need  not  doubt  that  'the  lay 
that  Sir  Dinadan  made  by  King  Mark,  which  was  the  worst 
lay  that  ever  harper  sang  with  harp  or  with  any  other  instru- 
ments,' must  have  had  its  precise  counterparts  in  actual  life 5. 
The  Sarum  statutes  of  131 9  lay  especial  stress  on  the  flattery 
and  the  evil  speaking  with  which  the  minstrels  rewarded  their 


cf.  the  complaint  against  knights  in  tonsure.     The  flat  shoe  had  been 

A  Poem  on  the  times  of  Edward  II  a  mark  of  the  niimi  planipedes  at 

(Percy  Soc.  lxxxii),  23  :  Rome. 

'  Now  thei  beth  disgysed,  2  Gautier,  ii.  105.     Thus  Nicolete 

So  diverselych  i-di^t,  (Aucassin  et    Nicolete,   ed.    Bour- 

That  no  man-may  knowe  dillon,  120)  'prist  une  herbe,  si  en 

A  mynstrel  from  a  knyjt  oinst  son  cief  et  son  visage,  si  qu'ele 

Wei  ny.'  fu  tote  noire  et  tainte.     Et  ele  fist 

The  miniatures  show  minstrels  in  faire  cote  et  mantel  et  cemisse  et 

short  coats  to  the  knees  and  some-  braies,si  s'atornaaguisedejogleor'; 

times  short  capes  with  hoods.    The  cf.   King  Horn    (ed.    Hall,   1901), 

Act  of  Apparel  (1463,  3  Edw.  IV,  c.  1471-2  : 

5)  excepts  minstrels  and  'players  in  'Hi  sede,  hi  weren  harpurs, 

their  interludes.'     The  Franciscan  And  sume  were  gigours.' 

story  (p.  57)  shows  that  some  of  the  s  Roger  de  Hoveden,  Chronicon 

humbler    minstrels     went     shabby  (R.  S),  iii.  143  '  De  regno  Francorum 

enough.  cantores  et  ioculatores   muneribus 

1  Klein,  iii.  635  ;  Du  MeVil,  Or.  allexerat,  ut  de  illo  canerent  in  pla- 

Lat.  30  ;  Gautier,  ii.  104  ;    Geoffrey  teis  ;  et  iam  dicebatur  quod  non  erat 

of  Monmouth,  Historia  Britonum,  talis  in  orbe.' 

ix.  1  '  rasit  capillos  suos  et  barbam,  4  Ten  Brink,  i.  314. 

cultumque  ioculatoris  cum  cithara  8  Malory,    Morte    d1  Arthur,    x. 

cepit. '      Cf.   the   canon  quoted  on  27,  31.     Even    King   Mark  let  the 

p.  61  requiring  Goliardic  clerks  to  minstrel  go  quit,  because  he  was  a 

be  shorn  or  shaven,  to  obliterate  the  minstrel. 


46  MINSTRELSY 

entertainers1.  Sometimes,  indeed,  they  over-reached  them- 
selves, for  Henry  I  is  related  to  have  put  out  the  eyes  of 
Lucas  de  Barre,  a  Norman  jongleur,  or  perhaps  rather  trou- 
vere,  who  made  and  sang  songs  against  him2.  But  Lucas  de 
Barre's  rank  probably  aggravated  his  offence,  and  as  a  rule  the 
minstrels  went  scot-free.  A  wiser  churchman  here  and  there 
was  not  slow  to  perceive  how  the  unexampled  hold  of  min- 
strelsy on  the  popular  ear  might  be  turned  to  the  service  of 
religion.  Eadhelm,  standing  in  gleeman's  attire  on  an  English 
bridge  to  mingle  words  of  serious  wisdom  with  his  carmina 
trivialia,  is  one  instance 3.  And  in  the  same  spirit  St.  Francis, 
himself  half  a  troubadour  in  youth,  would  call  his  Minorites 
ioculatores  Domini,  and  send  them  singing  over  the  world  to 
beg  for  their  fee  the  repentance  and  spiritual  joy  of  their 
hearers  4.  A  popular  hymn-writer  of  the  present  day  is  alleged 
to  have  thought  it  '  hard  that  the  devil  should  have  all  the  good 
tunes ' ;  but  already  in  the  Middle  Ages  religious  words  were 
being  set  to  secular  music,  and  graced  with  the  secular  imagery 
of  youth  and  spring5. 

But  if  the  minstrels  were  on  the  one  hand  a  force  among 
the  people,  on  the  other  they  had  the  ear  of  kings.     The 

1  Cf.  p.  40.  nerari  a  vobis,  videlicet  ut  stetis  in 

2  Ordericus  Vitalis,  Hist.  Eccles.  vera  paenitentia."  Et  ait  :  "  Quid 
xii.  19 'pro  derisoriis  cantionibus  . . .  enim  sunt  servi  Dei  nisi  quidam 
quin  etiam  indecentes  de  me  canti-  ioculatores  eius  qui  corda  hominum 
lenas  facetus  choraula  composuit,  erigere  debent  et  movere  ad  laeti- 
ad  iniuriam  mei  palam  cantavit,  ma-  tiam  spiritualem."  '  Cf.  Sabatier, 
levolosque  mihi  hostes  ad  cachinnos  Life  of  St.  Francis,  9,  51,  307. 
ita  saepe  provocavit.'  Lucas  de  Perhaps  Francis  may  have  heard  of 
Barre  seems  to  have  been  of  noble  Joachim  of  Flora,  his  contemporary, 
birth,  but  'palam  cantavit  cantile-  who  wrote  in  his  Commentary  on 
nas.'  the   Apocalypse,  f.  183.  a.  2    'qui 

3  Cf.  p.  30.  vere  monachus  est  nihil  reputat  esse 

4  Speculum  Perfectionis  (ed.  Sa-  suum  nisi  citharam.' 

batier),  197.  When  Francis  had  fin-  6  The  MS.   of  the  famous  thir- 

ished  his  Canticle  of  the  Sun,  he  teenth-century  canon  Sumer  is  icu- 

thought  for  a  moment  of  summon-  men  in  has  religious  words  written 

ing  '  frater  Pacificus  qui  in  saeculo  beneath  the  profane  ones  ;  cf.  Wool- 

vocabatur  rex  versuum  et  fuit  valde  dridge,   Oxford  Hist,  of  Music,  i. 

curialis  doctor  cantorum,' and  giving  326.     Several  religious  adaptations 

him  a  band  of  friars  who  might  sing  of  common  motives  of  profane  lyric 

it  to    the    people    at    the    end    of  are  amongst  the  English  thirteenth- 

their  sermons  :  '  finitis  autem  laudi-  century  poems  preserved  in   Harl. 

bus  volebat  quod  praedicator  diceret  MS.   2253    (Specimens  of  Lyrical 

populo  :    "Nos    sumus    ioculatores  Poetry:   Percy  Soc,  1842,  no.  19, 

Domini,  et  pro  his  volumus  remu-  and  ed.  Boddeker,  Berlin,  1878). 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  47 

English  court,  to  judge  by  the  payments  recorded   in   the 
exchequer  books,  must  have  been  full  of  them  1.     The  fullest 
and  most  curious  document  on  the  subject  dates  from  the 
reign  of  Edward  I.     It  is  a  roll  of  payments  made  on  the 
occasion  of  a  Whitsuntide  feast  held  in  London  in  the  year 
1306,  and  a  very  large  number  of  the  minstrels  recorded  are 
mentioned  by  name  2.     At  the  head  of  the  list  come  five  min- 
strels with  the  high-sounding  title  of  le  roy  3,  and  these  get  five 
marks  apiece.     A  number  of  others  follow,  who  received  sums 
varying  from  one  mark  upwards.     Most  of  these  have  French 
names,  and  many  are  said  to  be  in  the  company  of  this  or  that 
noble  or  reverend  guest  at  the  feast.     Finally,  two  hundred 
marks  were  distributed  in  smaller  sums  amongst  the  inferior 
minstrels,  les  autres  menestrans  de  la  commune,  and  some  of 
these  seem  to  have  been  of  English  birth.    Below  the  roys  rank 
two  minstrels,  Adam  le  Boscu  and  another,  who  are  dignified 
with  the  title  of  maistre,  which  probably  signifies  that  they 
were  clerks4.    The  other  names  are  mainly  descriptive,  'Janin 
le  Lutour,'  'Gillotin  le  Sautreour,'  'Baudec  le  Taboureur,'  and 
the  like  ;  a  few  are  jesting  stage  names,  such  as  the  inferior  per- 
formers of  our  music  halls  bear  to-day  6.    Such  are  '  Guillaume 
sanz  Maniere,'  '  Reginaldus  le  Menteur,'  'le  Petit  Gauteron,' 
'ParvusWillielmus,'  and  those  of  the  attractive  comedians  Perle 
in  the  Eghe,  and  Matill'  Makejoye.     The  last,  by  the  way,  is 
the  only  woman  performer  named.     The  resources  of  Edward 
I  could  no  doubt  stand  the  strain  of  rewarding  with  royal 
magnificence  the  entertainers  of  his  guests.     There  is  plenty 
of  evidence,  however,  that  even  on  secular  grounds  the  dia- 
tribes of  the  moralists  against  the  minstrels  were  often  enough 
justified.     To  the  lavish  and  unthrifty  of  purse  they  became 

1  Jusserand,  E.  W.  L.  195,  199,  wrote  a  lament  for  his  death  in  1288. 
215;  Strutt,  194-5,  210,  227;  He  quotes  Hist.  Lilt.  xx.  666,  as  to 
Hazlitt-Warton,  ii.  119;   Chappell,     this. 

i.    15;    Collier,    i.   22;     Wardrobe  5  Gautier,  ii.  103;   Be"dier,  405, 

Accounts  of Edward  J (Soc.  Antiq.),  quote    many   similar  names;    e.g. 

163,  166,  168.  Quatre   CEufs,  Malebouche,  Ronge- 

2  Cf.  Appendix  C.  foie,   Tourne-en-fuie,    Courtebarbe, 

3  Cf.  Appendix  D.  Porte-Hotte,  Mai  Quarrel,  Songe- 

4  This  cannot  be  the  famous  Adan  Feste    a    la    grant   viele,    Mal-ap- 
de  le  Hale  (cf.  ch.  viii),  known  as  pareillie,    Pe\6,   Brisc-Pot,    Simple 
'le  Bossu,'  if  Guy,  178,  is  right  in  d' Amour,  Chevrete,  Passereau. 
saying  that  his  nephew,  Jean  Mados, 


48  MINSTRELSY 

blood-suckers.  Matilda,  the  wife  of  Henry  I,  is  said  to  have 
squandered  most  of  her  revenues  upon  them *  ;  while  the 
unfortunate  Robert  of  Normandy,  if  no  less  a  chronicler  than 
Ordericus  Vitalis  may  be  believed,  was  stripped  by  these 
rapacious  gentry  to  the  very  skin  2.  Yet  for  all  the  days  of 
honour  and  all  the  rich  gifts  the  minstrel  life  must  have  had  its 
darker  side.  Easily  won,  easily  parted  with  ;  and  the  lands  and 
laced  mantles  did  not  last  long,  when  the  elbow  itched  for  the 
dice-box.  This  was  the  incurable  ruin  of  the  minstrel  folk  3. 
And  even  that  life  of  the  road,  so  alluring  to  the  fever  in  the 
blood,  must  have  been  a  hard  one  in  the  rigours  of  an  English 
climate.  To  tramp  long  miles  in  wind  and  rain,  to  stand  wet 
to  the  skin  and  hungry  and  footsore,  making  the  slow  bour- 
geois laugh  while  the  heart  was  bitter  within  ;  such  must  have 
been  the  daily  fate  of  many  amongst  the  humbler  minstrels  at 
least4.  And  at  the  end  to  die  like  a  dog  in  a  ditch,  under 
the  ban  of  the  Church  and  with  the  prospect  of  eternal  damna- 
tion before  the  soul. 

Kings  and  nobles  were  not  accustomed  to  depend  for  their 
entertainment  merely  upon  the  stray  visits  of  wandering 
minstrels.  Others  more  or  less  domiciled  formed  a  permanent 
part  of  the  household.  These  indeed  are  the  minstrels  in  the 
stricter  sense  of  that  term — ministri,  minister  tales.  In  Domes- 
day Book,  as  we  have  seen,  one  Berdic  bears  the  title  of 
the  ioculator  regis.  Shortly  afterwards  Henry  I  had  his 
mimus  regis,  by  name  Raherus,  who  made  large  sums  by  his 
suavitas  {ocularis,  and  founded  the  great  priory  of  St.  Bar- 
tholomew at  Smithfield 5.      Laying  aside  his  parti-coloured 

1  William  of  Malmesbury,  Gesta  works  by  Jubinal  and  Kressner,  and 

Reg.  Angl.  (R.  S.),  ii.  494.  the    biography    by   Cle"dat    in    the 

r  Ordericus  Vitalis,  v.  12,  &c.    On  series  of   Grands  E-crivains  fran- 

one  occasion   '  ad  ecclesiam,    quia  cais. 

nudus  erat,  non  pervenit.'  6  Morley,  Bartholomew  Fair,  I- 

3  Bddier,  359.  25,  from  Liber  Fundacionis  in  Cott. 

4  Gautier,  chs.  xx,  xxi,  gives  an  Vesfi.  B.  ix;  Leland,  Collectanea, 
admirable  account  of  the  jongleur1  s  I,  61,  99  ;  Dugdale,  Monasticon,  ii. 
daily  life,  and  its  seamy  side  is  166;  Stow,  Survey,  140;  C.  Knight, 
brought  out  by  Bddier,  399-418.  London,  ii.  34  ;  Percy,  406.  No  min- 
A  typical  jougletir  figure  is  that  of  strels,  however,  appear  in  the  formal 
the  poet  Rutebeuf,  a  man  of  genius,  list  of  Henry  I's  Norman  Household 
but  often  near  death's  door  from  (+1 135),  which  seems  to  have  been 
starvation.    See  the  editions  of  his  the  nucleus  of  the  English  Royal 


/ 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  49 

coat,  he  even  became  himself  the  first  prior  of  the  new 
community.  The  old  spirit  remained  with  him,  however  ; 
and  it  is  recorded  that  the  fame  of  the  house  was  largely 
magnified  by  means  of  some  feigned  miracles  which  Raherus 
put  forth.  Richard  I  was  a  noted  lover  of  song,  and  the 
names  of  more  than  one  minstrel  of  his  are  preserved. 
There  was  Ambroise,  who  was  present  at  Richard's  coro- 
nation in  1 189  and  at  the  siege  of  Acre  in  1191,  and  who 
wrote  a  history,  still  extant,  of  the  third  crusade 1.  And 
there  was  that  Blondiaux  or  Blondel  de  Nesle,  the  story 
of  whose  discovery  of  his  captive  master,  apocryphal  though 
it  may  be,  is  in  all  the  history  books2.  Henry  III  had. his 
magistcr  Henricus  versificator  in  1251  3,  and  his  magister 
Ricardus  citharista  in  1252  4.  A  harper  was  also  amongst 
the  ministri  of  Prince  Edward  in  the  Holy  War  5,  and  when 
the  prince  became  Edward  I,  he  still  retained  one  in  his 
service.  He  is  mentioned  as  Walter  de  Stourton,  the  king's 
harper,  in  1290 6,  and  as  the  citharista  regis  in  1300 7. 
Edward  II  had  several  minstrels,  to  one  of  whom,  William 
de  Morlee,  known  as  Roy.  de  North,  he  made  a  grant  of  land  8. 
By  this  time  the  royal  minstrels  seem  to  have  become  a 
regular"  establishment  of  no  inconsiderable  numbers.  Under 
Edward  III  they  received  j\d.  a  day9.  A  little  later  in  the 
reign,  between  1344  and  1347,  there  were  nineteen  who 
received  izd.  a  day  in  war,  when  they  doubtless  formed 
a  military  band,  and  20s.  a  year  in  peace.  These  included 
five  trumpeters,  one  citoler,  five  pipers,  one  tabouretter,  two 
clarions,  one   nakerer,  and  one  fiddler,  together  with  three 

Household  as  it  existed  up  to  1782  6  Chappell,  i.  15,  from  Wardrobe 

(Hall,  Red  Book  of 'Exchequer, R.S.,  Book,  18  Edw.  I. 

iii.  cclxxxvii,  807).  7   Wardrobe  Accounts  of  Edw.  I 

1  Gautier,    ii.  47,  54  ;    G.  Paris,  (Soc.  Antiq.),  323. 

§   88  ;    Ambroise,  L'Estoire  de  la  8  Anstis,  Register  of  Order  of  the 

Guerre  Sainte,  ed.  G.  Paris  (Docu-  Garter,  ii.  303,  from  Pat.  de  terr. 

ments  ine'dits  sur  F Hist,  de  France,  forisfact.  16  Edw.  III.     Cf.  Gesta 

1897).  Edw.  de   Carnarzion  in  Chron.  of 

2  Percy,  358.  Edw.  I  and  II  (R.  S.),  ii-  91  '  ad- 

3  Madox,  Hist,  of  Exchequer,  haesit  cantoribus,  tragoedis,  aurigis, 
268.  navigiis  et  aliis  huiuscemodi  artifi- 

4  Percy,  365.  ciis  mechanicis.'- 

6  Walter  Hemmingford,  Chroni-  9  Strutt,  194;  Issue  Roll  of  Tho- 
con,  c.  35  ( Vet.  Hist.  Angl.  Script,  mas  de  Brantingham  (ed.  Devon), 
ii.  591).  54-57,  296-8. 

CHAMBERS.    I  E 


50  MINSTRELSY 

additional  minstrels,  known  as  waits1.  The  leader  of  the 
minstrels  bore  the  title  of  rex,  for  in  1387  we  find  a  licence 
given  by  Richard  II  to  his  rex  ministrallorum,  John  Caumz, 
permitting  him  to  pass  the  seas 2.  Henry  V  had  fifteen 
minstrels  when  he  invaded  France  in  1415,  and  at  a  later  date 
eighteen,  who  received  lid.  a  day  apiece3.  At  the  end  of 
his  reign  his  minstrels  received  100^.  a  year,  and  this  annuity 
was  continued  under  Henry  VI,  who  in  1455  had  twelve  of 
them,  besides  a  wait.  In  the  next  year  this  king  issued 
a  commission  for  the  impressing  of  boys  to  fill  vacancies  in 
the  body 4.  Edward  IV  had  thirteen  minstrels  and  a  wait  5. 
By  1469  these  had  been  cut  down  to  eight.  At  their  head 
was  a  chief,  who  was  now  called,  not  as  in  Richard  II's  time 
rex,  but  marescallus 6.  The  eight  king's  minstrels  and  their 
marescallus  can  be  traced  through  the  reign  of  Henry  VII, 
and  so  on  into  the  sixteenth  century7. 

Nor  was  the  royal  household  singular  in  the  main- 
tenance of  a  permanent  body  of  minstrels.  The  citharista 
of  Margaret,  queen  of  Edward  I,  is  mentioned  in  1300, 
and  her  istrio  in  1302 8.  Philippa,  queen  of  Edward  III, 
had  her  minstrels  in  1337 9,  and  those  of  Queen  Elizabeth 
were  a  regular  establishment  in  the  reign  of  Henry  VII 10. 
The  Scottish  court,  too,  had  its  recognized  troupe,  known  by 
the  early  years  of  the  sixteenth  century  as  the  '  minstrelis 
of  the  chekkar  n.'  As  with  kings  and  queens  so  with  lesser 
men.  The  list  of  minstrels  at  court  in  1306  includes  the 
harpers  and  other  musicians  of  several  lords,  both  English 
and  foreign12.  In  1308  the  earl  of  Lancaster  had  a  body 
of  menestralli  and    an   armiger   menestrallorum 13.     During 

1  Household  Ordinances,  4,  11.  542,  572  ;  ii.  68,  84,  176. 

2  Rymer,  vii.  555.  "  The     entry     '  ad     solvendum 

3  Ibid.  ix.  255,  260,  336.  histrionibus '  occurs  in  1364  (Cotn- 

4  Ibid.  x.  287  ;  xi.  375.  pott  Camerarii  Scot.  i.  422).     The 

6  Household  Ordinances,  48.  Exchequer    Rolls    from     1433-50 
8  Rymer,  xi.  642;  cf.  Appendix  D.     contain  payments   to   the    '  mimi,' 

7  Ibid.  xiii.  705;  Collier,  i.  45;  '  histriones,'  '  ioculatores  regis'; 
Campbell,  i.  407, 5 16, 570;  ii.  100.224.  and  in   1507-8  for  the  'histriones 

8  Wardrobe  Accounts  of  Edw.  I  in  scaccario '  or  'minstrels  of  the 
(Soc.  Antiq.),  7,  95;  Calendar  of  chekkar'  {Accounts  of  Treasurer 
Anc.  Deeds,  ii.  A,  2050,  2068,  2076.  of  Scotland,  i.  xx,  cxcix;  ii.  lxxi). 

9  Strutt,  189.  "  Cf.  Appendix  C. 

10  Collier,i.  46;  Campbell,  i.  407,         13  Collier, i. 21, from Lansd.MS.l. 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  51 

the  fourteenth  and  fifteenth  centuries  entries  of  payments 
to  the  minstrels  of  a  vast  number  of  domini,  small  and 
great,  are  common  in  the  account  books x.  Henry,  earl 
of  Derby,  took  minstrels  with  him  in  his  expeditions  abroad 
of  1390  and  1392  2;  while  the  Household  Book  of  the  earl  of 
Northumberland  (f  1512)  shows  that  he  was  accustomed  to 
entertain  '  a  Taberett,  a  Luyte,  and  a  Rebecc,'  as  well  as  six 
'  trompettes3.'  Minstrels  are  also  found,  from  the  beginning 
of  the  fifteenth  century,  in  the  service  of  the  municipal  cor- 
porations. London,  Coventry,  Bristol,  Shrewsbury,  Norwich, 
Chester,  York,  Beverley,  Leicester,  Lynn,  Canterbury  had 
them,  to  name  no  others.  They  received  fixed  fees  or  dues, 
wore  the  town  livery  and  badge  of  a  silver  scutcheon,  played 
at  all  local  celebrations  and  festivities,  and  were  commonly 
known  as  waits4".  This  term  we  have  already  found  in  use 
at  court,  and  the  '  Black  Book,'  which  contains  the  household 
regulations  of  Edward  IV,  informs  us  that  the  primary  duty 
of  a  wait  was  to  '  pipe  the  watch,'  summer  and  winter,  at 
certain  fixed  hours  of  the  night5. 

It  must  not  be  supposed  that  established  minstrels,  whether 
royal,  noble,  or  municipal,  were  always  in  constant  attendance 
on  their  lords.     Certain  fixed  services  were  required  of  them, 

Two  of  this  lord's  menestriers  were  Gautier,  ii.  57,  describes  the  com- 

entertained   by   Robert   of  Artois,  munal  cantorini  of  Perugia,   from 

who  also  had  his  own  (Guy,  154).  the  fourteenth  to  the  sixteenth  cen- 

1  Gautier,  ii.  51  ;  cf.  the  extracts  tury.  The  usual  Latin  term  for 
from  various  coviputi  in  Appendix  the  Beverley  waits  is  speculatores  ; 
E.  There  are  many  entries  also  in  but  they  are  also  called  minislralli, 
the  accounts  of  King's  Lynn  {Hist,  histriones  and  mimi.  Apparently 
MSS.  xi.  3.213)  ;  Beverley  (Leach,  waits  are  intended  by  the  satrapi 
Beverley  MSS.  171),  &c.  of  the  Winchester  Accounts  (App. 

2  L.  T.  Smith,  Derby  Accounts  E.  (iv)).  Elsewhere  histriones  is 
(C.  S.),  xcvi.  the  most  usual  term.     The  signa- 

3  Percy,  N.  H.  B.  42,  344.  tories  to  the   1321    statutes  of  the 

4  Stowe,  Survey,  39  (London)  ;  Paris  guild  include  several  guhtes 
Smith,   English    Guilds,   423,  447  (Bernhard,  iii.  402). 

(Bristol,     Norwich);     Davies,    14  5  Household  Ordinances,  48  'A 

(York);     Kelly,    131     (Leicester);  Wayte,  that  nyghtly,  from  Mighel- 

Morris,  348  (Chester)  ;  Civis,  No.  masse  till  Shere-Thursday,  pipeth 

xxi    (Canterbury)  ;      Sharpe,     207  the  watche  within  this  courte  fower 

(Coventry) ;  Hist.  MSS.  xi.  3.  163  tymes,  and  in  the  somcr  nyghtes 

(Lynn)  ;     Leach,    Beverley   MSS.  three  tymes.'     He  is  also  to  attend 

105, &c.  (Beverley);  for  Shrewsbury  the  new  Knights  of  the  Bath  when 

cf.  Appendix  E.    On  Wails'  Badges,  they  keep  watch  in  the  chapel  the 

cf.  LI.  Jewitt,  in  Reliquary,  xii.  145.  night  before  they  are  dubbed. 

E  2 


52 


MINSTRELSY 


which  were  not  very  serious,  except  in  the  case  of  waits1; 
for  the  rest  of  their  time  they  were  free.  This  same  '  Black 
Book'  of  Edward  IV  is  very  explicit  on  the  point.  The 
minstrels  are  to  receive  a  yearly  fee  and  a  livery2.  They 
must  attend  at  court  for  the  five  great  feasts  of  the  year.  At 
other  times,  two  or  three  out  of  their  number,  or  more  if  the 
king  desire  it,  are  to  be  in  waiting.  The  last  regulation  on 
the  subject  is  curious.  The  king  forbids  his  minstrels 
to  be  too  presumptuous  or  familiar  in  asking  rewards  of 
any  lord  of  the  land ;  and  in  support  of  this  he  quotes  a 
similar  prohibition  by  the  Emperor  Henry  II  3.  Doubtless, 
in   the   intervals  of  their   services,  the   household  minstrels 


1  The  Lynn  waits  had  to  go 
through  the  town  from  All  Saints 
to  Candlemas.  Those  of  Coventry 
had  similar  duties,  and  in  1467  were 
forbidden  'to  pass  this  Cite  but  to 
Abbotts  and  Priors  within  x  myles 
of  this  Cite.' 

2  The  six  minstrels  of  the  Earl 
of  Derby  in  1391  had  a  livery  of 
'  blod  ray  cloth  and  tanne  facings ' 
(Wylie,  iv.  160). 

3  Household  Ordinances,  48 : 
'  Mynstrelles,  xiii,  whereof  one  is 
verger,  that  directeth  them  all  in 
festivall  dayes  to  theyre  stations,  to 
bloweings  and  pipynges,  to  suche 
offices  as  must  be  warned  to  pre- 
pare for  the  king  and  his  houshold 
at  metes  and  soupers,  to  be  the 
more  readie  in  all  servyces  ;  and  all 
these  sittinge  in  the  hall  togyder  ; 
whereof  sume  use  trumpettes,  sume 
shalmuse  and  small  pipes,  and 
sume  as  strengemen,  comyng  to 
this  courte  at  five  festes  of  the  yere, 
and  then  to  take  theyre  wages  of 
houshold  after  iiijd  ob.  a  day,  if  they 
be  present  in  courte,  and  then  they 
to  avoyde  the  next  day  after  the 
festes  be  done.  Besides  eche  of 
them  anothyr  reward  yerely,  taking 
of  the  king  in  the  resceyte  of  the 
chekker,  and  clothing  wynter  and 
somer,  or  xx8  a  piece,  and  lyverey 
in  courte,  at  evyn  amonges  them 
all,  iiij  gallons  ale  ;  and  for  wynter 
season,  iij  candels  wax,  vj  candells 
peris',  iiij  talwood,  and  sufficiaunt 


logging  by  the  herberger,  for  them 
and  theyre  horses,  nygh  to  the 
courte.  Also  havyng  into  courte 
ij  servauntes  honest,  to  beare  theyre 
trumpettes,  pipes,  and  other  instru- 
mentes,  and  a  torche  for  wynter 
nyghts,  whyles  theyblowe  to  souper, 
and  other  revelles,  delyvered  at  the 
chaundrey;  and  allway  ij  of  these 
persons  to  continue  in  courte  in 
wages,  beyng  present  to  warne  at  the 
kinge's  rydinges,  when  he  goeth  to 
horse-backe,asofteasitshallrequire, 
and  by  theyre  blowinges  the  hous- 
hold meny  may  follow  in  the  coun- 
tries. And  if  any  of  these  two 
minstrelles  be  sicke  in  courte,  he 
taketh  ij  loves,  one  messe  of  grete 
mete,  one  gallon  ale.  They  have 
no  part  of  any  rewardes  gevyn  to 
the  houshold.  And  if  it  please  the 
kinge  to  have  ij  strenge  Minstrelles 
to  contynue  in  like  wise.  The  kinge 
wull  not  for  his  worshipp  that  his 
Minstrelles  be  too  presumptuous, 
nor  too  familier  to  aske  any  rewardes 
of  the  lordes  of  his  londe,  remem- 
bring  De  Henrico  secundo  im- 
peratore  [1002-24]  qui  omnes 
Ioculatores  suos  et  Armaturos  mo- 
nuerit,  ut  nullus  eorum  in  eius 
nomine  vel  dummodo  steterint  in 
servicio  suo  nihil  ab  aliquo  in  regno 
suo  deberent  petere  donandum  ; 
sed  quod  ipsi  domini  donatores  pro 
Regis  amore  citius  pauperibus  ero- 
garent.' 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE 


53 


travelled,  like  their  unattached  brethren  of  the  road,  but  with 
the  added  advantage  of  a  letter  of  recommendation  from  their 
lord,  which  ensured  them  the  hospitality  of  his  friends1. 
Such  letters  were  indeed  often  given,  both  to  the  minstrels 
of  a  man's  own  household  and  as  testimonials  to  other 
minstrels  who  may  have  especially  pleased  the  giver.  Those 
interesting  collections  of  mediaeval  epistolary  formulae,  the 
summae  dictaminis,  contain  many  models  for  them,  and  judging 
by  the  lavish  eulogy  which  they  employ,  the  minstrels  them- 
selves must  have  had  a  hand  in  drawing  them  up 2.  Many 
minstrels  probably  confined  themselves  to  short  tours  in  the 
vicinity  of  their  head  quarters ;  others,  like  Widsith,  the  Anglo- 
Saxon  scop,  were  far  travellers.  John  Caumz  received  a  licence 
from  Richard  II  to  cross  the  seas,  and  in  1483  we  find 
Richard  III  entertaining  minstrels  of  the  dukes  of  Austria 
and  Bavaria3.  Possibly  the  object  of  John  Caumz  was  to 
visit  one  of  the  scolae  ministrallorum  in  France,  where  experi- 
ences might  be  exchanged  and  new  songs  learnt.  Beau- 
vais,  Lyon,  Cambrai  were  famous  for  these  schools,  which 
were  held  year  by  year  in  Lent,  when  performances  were 
stopped  ;  and  the  wardrobe  accounts  of  Edward  III  record 
grants  of  licences  and  expenses  to  Barbor  and  Morlan,  two  bag- 
pipers, to  visit  the  scolas  ministrallis  in  partibus  trans  mare  4. 


1  Percy,  N.  H.  B.  (tl5i2),  339. 
The  king's  shawms,  if  they  came 
yearly,  got  icw.,  the  king's  jugler 
and  the  king's  or  queen's  bearward, 
6s.  8d. ;  a  duke's  or  earl's  trumpeters, 
if  they  came  six  together,  also  got 
6s.  8d.,  an  earl's  minstrels  only  3^.  $d. 
If  the  troupe  came  only  once  in  two 
or  three  years,  and  belonged  to  a 
'  speciall  Lorde,  Friende,  or  Kyns- 
man'  of  the  earl,  the  rate  was 
higher. 

2  Gautier,  ii.  107,  from  Bibl.  de 
I1 'Arsenal MS.  854;  e.g.  '  Depreca- 
tio  pro  done?  instrioni  impendendo. 
Salutem  et  amoris  perpetui  firmi- 
tatem.  R.  latorem  praesentium, 
egregium  instrionem  qui  nuper 
meis  interfuit  nuptiis,  ubi  suum 
officium  exercuit  eleganter,  ad  vos 
cum  magna  confidentia  destinamus, 
rogantes    precibus,   quibus  possu- 


mus,  quatinus  aliquid  subsidium 
gracie  specialis  eidem  impendere 
debeatis.'  Collier,  i.  42,  gives  a 
letter  of  Richard  III  for  his  bear- 
ward. 

3  Collier,  i.  41. 

*  Strutt,  194  ;  Gautier,  ii.  173-8; 
H.  Lavoix,  ii.  198.  They  are 
called  Scolae  ministrorum,  Scolae 
mimorum.  They  can  be  traced  to 
the  fourteenth  century.  Geneve 
and  Bourg-en-Bresse  also  had 
them.  The  Paris  statutes  of  1407 
(cf.  Appendix  F)  require  a  licence 
from  the  rot  des  me'nestrels  for  such 
an  assembly.  A  Beauvais  com- 
putus (1402)  has  '  Dati  sunt  de 
gratia  panes  ducenti  capitulares 
mimis  in  hac  civitate  de  diversis 
partibus  pro  cantilenis  novis  addi- 
scendis  confluentibus.' 


54  MINSTRELSY 

From  the  fourteenth  century  it  is  possible  to  trace  the 
growth  of  the  household  minstrels  as  a  privileged  class  at 
the  expense  of  their  less  fortunate  rivals.  The  freedom 
of  access  enjoyed  by  the  entertainers  of  earlier  days  was 
obviously  open  to  abuse.  We  have  seen  that  in  1317  it  led 
to  the  offering  of  an  insult  to  Edward  II  by  an  emissary 
clad  as  a  minstrel  at  his  own  table.  It  was  only  two 
years  before  that  a  royal  proclamation  had  considerably 
restrained  the  liberty  of  the  minstrels.  In  view  of  the  number 
of  idle  persons  who  '  under  colour  of  mynstrelsie '  claimed 
food,  drink,  and  gifts  in  private  houses,  it  was  ordered  '  that 
to  the  houses  of  prelates  earls  and  barons  none  resort  to 
meate  and  drynke,  unless  he  be  a  mynstrel,  and  of  these 
mynstrels  that  there  come  none  except  it  be  three  or  four 
minstrels  of  honour  at  the  most  in  one  day,  unlesse  he  be 
desired  of  the  lorde  of  the  house.'  The  houses  of  meaner 
men  are  to  be  altogether  exempt,  except  at  their  desire1. 
I  think  it  is  probable  that  by  '  minstrels  of  honour '  we  must 
here  understand  'household  minstrels2';  and  that  the  seventy 
of  the  ordinance  must  have  come  upon  those  irresponsible 
vagrants  who  had  not  the  shelter  of  a  great  man's  name.  With 
the  Statutes  of  Labourers  in  the  middle  of  the  fourteenth  cen- 
tury begins  a  history  of  legislation  against  'vacabonds  and 
valiant  beggars,'  which  put  further  and  serious  difficulties  in 
the  way  of  the  free  movement  of  the  migratory  classes  through 
the  country  3.  Minstrels,  indeed,  are  not  specifically  declared 
to  be 'vacabonds' until  this  legislation  was  codified  by  William 
Cecil  in  1572 4;  but  there  is  evidence  that  they  were  none 

1  Hearne,  Appendix  ad  Lelandi  and  other  idlers  and  vagabonds, 
Collectanea,  vi.  36 ;  Percy,  367.  who  live  on  the  gifts  called  Cym- 
The  proclamation  is  dated  Aug.  6,  mortha,'  and  the  Act  of  1402 
9  Edvv.  II  (i.e.  13 1 5).  (4  Hen.  IV,  c.  27)  in  the  same  sense, 

2  No  technical  term  seems,  how-  seem  only  to  refer  to  the  Welsh 
ever,    intended     in    Launfal    (ed.  bards  (cf.  p.  yj). 

Ritson),  668  :  4  Ribton-Turner,    107    (14  Eliz. 

'  They  hadde  menstrales  of  moch  c.    5).     Whipping  is  provided  for 

honours,  '  all   Fencers  Bearewardes  Comon 

Fydelers,    sytolyrs,    and    trom-  Players     in     Enterludes    &    Min- 

pours.'  strels,  not  belonging  to  any  Baron 

3  C.J.  Ribton-Turner,  Vagrants  of  this  Realme  or  towards  any  other 
and  Vagrancy,  chs.  3,  4,  5.  The  honourable  personage  of  greater 
proclamation  of  1284  against  Degree;  all  Juglers  Pedlars  Tyn- 
•  Westours,   Bards,   and   Rhymers  kers  and  Petye  Chapmen ;   whiche 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  55 

the  less  liable  to  be  treated  as  such,  unless  they  had  some 
protection  in  the  shape  of  livery  or  licence.  At  Chester 
from  the  early  thirteenth  century,  and  at  Tutbury  in  Stafford- 
shire from  1380,  there  existed  courts  of  minstrelsy  which 
claimed  to  issue  licences  to  all  performers  within  their  pur- 
view. It  is  not  probable  that  this  jurisdiction  was  very 
effective.  But  a  step  taken  by  Edward  IV  in  1469  had  for 
its  avowed  object  to  strengthen  the  hands  of  what  may  be 
called  official  minstrelsy.  Representation  had  been  made 
to  the  king  that  certain  rude  husbandmen  and  artificers 
had  usurped  the  title  and  livery  of  his  minstrels,  and  had 
thus  been  enabled  to  gather  an  illegitimate  harvest  of  fees. 
He  therefore  created  or  revived  a  regular  guild  or  fraternity 
of  minstrels,  putting  his  own  household  performers  with 
their  marescallns  at  the  head  of  it,  and  giving  its  officers 
a  disciplinary  authority  over  the  profession  throughout  the 
country,  with  the  exception  of  Chester.  It  is  not  improbable, 
although  it  is  not  distinctly  stated,  that  admission  into  the 
guild  was  practically  confined  to  '  minstrels  of  honour.'  Cer- 
tainly one  of  the  later  local  guilds  which  grew  up  in  the 
sixteenth  century,  that  of  Beverley,  limited  its  membership  to 
such  as  could  claim  to  be  '  mynstrell  to  some  man  of  honour  or 
worship  or  waite  of  some  tovvne  corporate  or  other  ancient  town, 
or  else  of  such  honestye  and  conyng  as  shalbe  thought  laudable 
and  pleasant  to  the  hearers  V  In  any  case  the  whole  drift  of 
social  development  was  to  make  things  difficult  for  the  inde- 
pendent minstrels  and  to  restrict  the  area  of  their  wanderings. 
The  widespread  popularity  of  the  minstrels  amongst  the 
mediaeval  laity,  whether  courtiers,  burghers,  or  peasants,  needs 
no  further  labouring.  It  is  more  curious  to  find  that  in  spite 
of  the  formal  anathemas  of  the  Church  upon  their  art,  they 
were  not,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  rigorously  held  at  arm's  length 
by  the  clergy.     We  find  them  taking  a  prominent  part  in  the 

said  Fencers   Bearewardes   comon  Quorum,  wher  and  in  what   Shier 

Players      in      Enterludes       Myn-  they  shall  happen  to  wander.'    The 

strels  Juglers  Pedlars  Tynkers   &  terms  of  39  Eliz.  c.  4  (1 597~S)  are 

Petye     Chapmen,     shall      wander  very    similar,    but    I  Jac.   1,    c.    J 

abroade  and  have  not  Lycense  of  (1603-4),  took  away  the  exemption 

two   Justices   of  the  Peace  at  the  for  noblemen's  servants, 

leaste,  whereof  one  to   be   of  the  1  Appendix  F. 


56 


MINSTRELSY 


holyday  festivities  of  religious  guilds1;  we  find  them  solacing 
the  slow  progress  of  the  pilgrimages  with  their  ready  wit  and 
copious  narrative  or  song2;  we  find  them  received  with  favour 
by  bishops,  even  upon  their  visitations3,  and  not  excluded 
from  a  welcome  in  the  hall  of  many  a  monastery.  As  early 
as  1 1 80,  one  Galfridus,  a  citharoedus,  held  a  'corrody,'  or  right 
to  a  daily  commons  of  food  and  drink  in  the  abbey  of  Hyde 
at  Winchester4.  And  payments  for  performances  are  frequent 
in  the  accounts  of  the  Augustinian  priories  at  Canterbury5, 
Bicester,  and  Maxtoke,  and  the  great  Benedictine  houses  of 
Durham,  Norwich,  Thetford,  and  St.  Swithin's,  Winchester*, 
and  doubtless  in  those  of  many  another  cloistered  retreat.   The 


1  Gautier,  ii.  156;  Ducange,  s.v. 
Ministelli. 

2  Gautier,  ii.  158.  Strutt,  195, 
quotes  from  Colt.  MS.  Nero,  c.  viii 
a  payment  of  Edw.  Ill  'ministrallo 
facienti  ministralsiam  suam  coram 
imagine  Beatae  Mariae  in  Veltam, 
rege  praesente.'.  Chaucer's  pil- 
grims had  no  professional  minstrels, 
but  the  miller  did  as  well : 

'  He  was  a  janglere  and  a  goliar- 
deys,  .  .  . 
...  A  baggepype  wel  koude  he 

blowe  and  sowne, 
And  therwithal  he  broghte  us 
out  of  towne.' 
It  was  in  the  absence  of  regular 
minstrels  that  the  pilgrims  fell  to 
telling  one  another  stories. 

3  Gautier,  ii.  160.  Richard  Swin- 
field,  bishop  of  Hereford,  more 
than  once  rewarded  minstrels  on 
his  episcopal  rounds  (J.  Webb, 
Household  Expenses  of  Richard 
de  Swivfield,  C.  S.  i.  152,  155). 
The  bishops  of  Durham  in  1355, 
Norwich  in  1362,  and  Winchester  in 
1374,  1422,  and  1481  had  •  minstrels 
of  honour,'  like  any  secular  noble 
(see  Appendix  E,  &c).  Even  the 
austere  Robert  Grosseteste  had 
his  private  harper,  if  we  may  credit 
Mannyng,  150  : 

'  He   louede  moche  to  here  the 

harpe ; 
For   mannys   wyt   hyt   makyth 

sharpe. 
Next  hys  chaumbre,  besyde  hys 

stody, 


Hys     harpers     chaumbre    was 
fast  therby.' 
Mannyng  represents  Grosseteste  as 
excusing  his  predilection  by  a  refer- 
ence to  King  David. 

4  Madox,  Hist,  of  Exchequer, 
251. 

5  Norfolk  Archaeology,  xi.  339 
(Norwich)  ;  Hazlitt-Warton,  ii.  97  ; 
Kennet,  Parochial  Antiq.  ii.  259 
(Bicester) ;  Decern  Script  ores,  201 1 
(Canterbury) ;  for  the  rest  cf.  Ap- 
pendix E. 

6  Hazlitt-Warton,  ii.  97  ;  iii.  118, 
quotes  from  the  Register  of  St. 
Swithin's  amongst  the  Wolvesey 
MSS.;  in  1338  '  cantabat  ioculator 
quidam  nomine  Herebertus  canti- 
cum  Colbrondi,  necdum  gestum 
Emmae  reginae  a  iudicio  ignis 
liberatae,  in  aula  prions':  in  1374 
'  In  festo  Alwynis  episcopi  ...  in 
aula  conventus  sex  ministralli,  cum 
quatuor  citharisatoribus,  faciebant 
ministralcias  suas.  Et  post  cenam, 
in  magna  camera  arcuata  domini 
Prioris,  cantabant  idem  gestum  .  .  . 
Veniebant  autem  dicti  ioculatores 
a  castello  domini  regis  et  ex  familia 
episcopi.'  The  'canticum  Colbrondi' 
was  doubtless  a  romance  of  Guy  of 
Warwick,  of  which  Winchester  is 
the  locality.  Fragments  of  early 
fourteenth-century  English  versions 
exist  (Ten  Brink,  i.  246;  Jusserand, 
E.  L.  i.  224  ;  Zupitza,  Guy  of  War- 
wick, E.  E.  T.  S. ;  G.  L.  Morrill, 
Speculum  Gy  de  Warewyke,  E.  E. 
T.  S.  lxxxi). 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  57 

Minorite  chroniclers  relate,  how  at  the  time  of  the  coming  of 
the  friars  in  1224  two  of  them  were  mistaken  for  minstrels  by 
the  porter  of  a  Benedictine  grange  near  Abingdon,  received 
by  the  prior  and  brethren  with  unbecoming  glee,  and  when 
the  error  was  discovered,  turned  out  with  contumely1.  At 
such  semi-religious  foundations  also,  as  the  college  of  St.  Mary 
at  Winchester,  or  Waynflete's  great  house  of  St.  Mary 
Magdalen  in  Oxford,  minstrels  of  all  degrees  found,  at  least 
by  the  fifteenth  century,  ready  and  liberal  entertainment 2. 

How,  then,  is  one  to  reconcile  this  discrepancy  between  the 
actual  practice  of  the  monasteries  and  the  strict,  the  uncom- 
promising prohibition  of  minstrelsy  in  rule  and  canon  ?  An 
incomplete  answer  readily  presents  itself.  The  monks  being 
merely  human,  fell  short  of  the  ideal  prescribed  for  them. 
We  do  not  now  learn  for  the  first  time,  that  the  ambitions 
of  the  pious  founder,  the  ecclesiastical  law-giver,  the  patristic 
preacher,  were  one  thing  ;  the  effective  daily  life  of  churchmen 
in  many  respects  quite  another.  Here,  as  in  matters  of  even 
more  moment,  did  mediaeval  monasticism  '  dream  from  deed 
dissever ' — 

•  The  reule  of  Seint  Maure  or  of  Seint  Beneit, 
By-cause  that  it  was  old  and  som-del  streit 
This  ilke  monk  leet  olde  thinges  pace, 
And  held  after  the  newe  world  the  space.' 

True  enough,  but  not  the  whole  truth.  It  doubtless  explains 
the  behaviour  of  the  Benedictines  of  Abingdon  ;  but  we  can 
hardly  suppose  that  when  Robert  de  Grosseteste,  the  sworn 
enemy  of  ecclesiastical  abuses,  kept  his  harper's  chamber  next 
his  own,  he  was  surreptitiously  allowing  himself  an  illegitimate 
gratification  which  he  denied  to  his  clergy.  The  fact  is  that  the 
condemnations  of  the  Church,  transferred,  as  we  have  seen, 
wholesale   from   the   mimi  and   histriones   of   the   decaying 

1  Bartholomaeus(Albizzi)dePisis  2  See  Appendix  E.    At  Paris  the 

(1385-99),    Liber    Conformitatum  Statutes     of    Cornouaille    College 

(ed.  1590,  i.  94b)  ;  Antoninus  Episc.  (1380)    required    abstinence    from 

Florentiae  (1389-1459),  Chronicon  'ludis    mimorum,  ioculatorum,  hi- 

(ed.  1586,  iii.  752)  'alterius  linguae  strionum,  goliardorum,  et  consimi- 

ioculatores  eos  existimans  '  ;  cf.  A.  lium.'  Bulaeus,  v.  782,  gives  another 

Wood,  Hist,  et  Antiq.  Univ.  Oxon.  Paris  regulation  allowing  '  mimi,  ad 

(1674),     i.    69;    City    of   Oxford  summum  duo'  on  Twelfth   Night 

(O.  H.  S.),  ii.  349.  (Rashdall,  ii.  674). 


58  MINSTRELSY 

Empire,  were  honestly  not  applicable  without  qualification, 
even  from  the  ecclesiastical  point  of  view,  to  their  successors, 
the  mimi  and  histriones  of  the  Middle  Ages.  The  traditions 
of  the  Roman  stage,  its  manners,  its  topics,  its  ethical  code, 
became  indeed  a  large  part  of  the  direct  inheritance  of  min- 
strelsy. But,  as  we  have  seen,  they  were  far  from  being  the 
whole  of  that  inheritance.  The  Teutonic  as  well  as  the  Latin 
element  in  the  civilization  of  western  Europe  must  be  taken 
into  account.  The  minstrel  derives  from  the  disreputable 
planipes ;  he  derives  also  from  the  scop,  and  has  not  altogether 
renounced  the  very  different  social  and  ethical  position  which 
the  scop  enjoyed.  After  all,  nine-tenths  of  the  secular  music 
and  literature,  something  even  of  the  religious  literature,  of 
the  Middle  Ages  had  its  origin  in  minstrelsy.  Practically, 
if  not  theoretically,  the  Church  had  to  look  facts  in  the  face, 
and  to  draw  a  distinction  between  the  different  elements  and 
tendencies  that  bore  a  single  name.  The  formularies,  of  course, 
continued  to  confound  all  minstrels  under  the  common  con- 
■demnation  of  ioculatores.  The  Church  has  never  been  good 
at  altering  its  formularies  to  suit  altered  conditions.  But 
it  has  generally  been  good  at  practical  compromises.  And 
in  the  case  of  minstrelsy,  a  practical  compromise,  rough 
enough,  was  easily  arrived  at. 

The  effective  conscience  of  the  thirteenth-century  Church 
had  clearly  come  to  recognize  degrees  in  the  ethical  status  of 
the  minstrels.  No  more  authoritative  exponent  of  the  official 
morals  of  his  day  can  be  desired  than  St.  Thomas  Aquinas, 
and  St.  Thomas  Aquinas  is  very  far  from  pronouncing  an 
unqualified  condemnation  of  all  secular  entertainment.  The 
profession  of  an  histrio,  he  declares,  is  by  no  means  in  itself 
unlawful.  It  was  ordained  for  the  reasonable  solace  of 
humanity,  and  the  histrio  who  exercises  it  at  a  fitting  time 
and  in  a  fitting  manner  is  not  on  that  account  to  be  regarded 
as  a  sinner 1.     Another  contemporary  document  is  still  more 

1  Thomas  Aqu'mas,Summa  Theo-  manae,  deputari  possunt  aliqua  offi- 

logiae   (ti274),  ii.  2,  quaest.    168,  cia  licita.     et  ideo  etiam  officium 

art.    3    '  Sicut    dictum    est,    ludus  histrionum,  quod  ordinatur  ad  sola- 

est  necessarius  ad  conversationem  tium   hominibus  exhibendum,  non 

vitae  humanae.     ad  omnia  autem,  est  secundum  se  illicitum,  nee  sunt 

quae  sunt  utilia  conversationi  hu-  in  statu  peccati :  dummodo  moderate 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE 


59 


explicit.  This  is  the  Penitential  written  at  the  close  of  the 
thirteenth  century  by  Thomas  de  Cabham,  sub-dean  of  Salis- 
bury and  subsequently  archbishop  of  Canterbury1.  In  the 
course  of  his  analysis  of  human  frailty,  Thomas  de  Cabham 
makes  a  careful  classification  from  the  ethical  point  of  view, 
of  minstrels.  There  are  those  who  wear  horrible  masks,  or 
entertain  by  indecent  dance  and  gesture.  There  are  those 
again  who  follow  the  courts  of  the  great,  and  amuse  by  satire 
and  by  raillery.  Both  these  classes  are  altogether  damnable. 
Those  that  remain  are  distinguished  by  their  use  of  musical 
instruments.  Some  sing  wanton  songs  at  banquets.  These 
too  are  damnable,  no  less  than  the  satirists  and  posture- 
mongers.  Others,  however,  sing  of  the  deeds  of  princes, 
and  the  lives  of  the  saints.  To  these  it  is  that  the  name 
ioculatores  more  strictly  belongs,  and  they,  on  no  less  an 
authority  than  that  of  Pope  Alexander  himself2,  may  be 
tolerated. 

Of  the  three  main  groups  of  minstrels  distinguished  by 
Thomas  de  Cabham,  two  correspond  roughly  to  the  two 
broad  types  which,  from  the  point  of  view  of  racial  tradition, 
we  have  already  differentiated.  His  musicians  correspond 
to  the  Teutonic  gleemen  and  their  successors  ;  his  posture- 
mongers  and  buffoons  to  the  Roman  mimi  and  their  successors. 


ludo  utantur,  id  est,  non  utendo 
aliquibus  illicitis  verbis  vel  factis  ad 
ludum,  et  non  adhibendo  ludum 
negotiis  et  temporibus  indebitis  .  .  . 
unde  illi,  qui  moderate  iis  subveni- 
unt,  non  peccant,  sed  iusta  faciunt, 
mercedem  ministerii  eorum  iis  at- 
tribuendo.  si  qui  autem  superflue 
sua  in  tales  consumunt,  vel  etiam 
sustentant  illos  histriones  qui  illici- 
tis ludis  utuntur,  peccant,  quasi  eos 
in  peccatis  foventes.  unde  Augus- 
tinus  dicit,  super  loan,  quod  donare 
res  suas  histriotiibus  vitium  est 
immane?  &c,  &c 

1  Cf.  Appendix  G. 

2  Another  version  of  this  story  is 
given  by  Petrus  Cantor  (ob.  1197), 
Verbum  Abbreviatutn,  c.  84  (P.  L. 
ccv.  254)  '  Ioculatori  cuidam  papa 
Alexander  (Alex.  Ill)  nee  concessit 
vivere  de  officio  suo,  nee  ei  penitus 


interdixit.'  In  c.  49  of  the  same 
work  Petrus  Cantor  inveighs  learn- 
edly Contra  dantes  histrionibus. 
Doubtless  the  Alexander  in  ques- 
tion is  Alexander  III  (11 59-81), 
though  the  (Alex.  Ill)  above  may 
be  due  to  the  seventeenth-century 
editor,  Galopinus.  A  hasty  glance 
at  the  voluminous  and  practically 
unindexed  decrees  and  letters  of 
Alexander  III  in  P.  L.  cc.  and 
Jaffe,  Regesta  Pontificum  Roma- 
norum  (ed.  2,  1885-8),  ii.  145-418, 
has  not  revealed  the  source  of  the 
story ;  and  I  doubt  whether  the 
Pope's  decision,  if  it  was  ever  given, 
is  to  be  found  in  black  and  white. 
The  two  reports  of  it  by  Thomas 
de  Cabham  and  Petrus  Cantor  are 
barely  consistent.  In  any  case,  it 
never  got  into  the  Gregorian  De- 
cretals. 


60  MINSTRELSY 

Who  then  are  Thomas  de  Cabham's  third  and  intermediate 
group,  the  satirists  whose  lampoons  beset  the  courts  of  the 
great  ?  Well,  raillery  and  invective,  as  we  have  seen,  were 
common  features  of  minstrelsy  ;  but  Gautier  may  very  likely 
be  right  when  he  surmises  that  Thomas  de  Cabham  has  par- 
ticularly in  mind  the  scolares  vagautes,  who  brought  so  much 
scandal  upon  the  Church  during  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth 
centuries  1.  Some  of  these  were  actually  out  at  elbows  and 
disfrocked  clerks ;  others  were  scholars  drifting  from  univer- 
sity to  university,  and  making  their  living  meantime  by  their 
wits ;  most  of  them  were  probably  at  least  in  minor  orders. 
But  practically  they  lived  the  life  of  the  minstrels,  tramping 
the  road  with  them,  sharing  the  same  temptations  of  wine, 
women,  and  dice,  and  bringing  into  the  profession  a  trained 
facility  of  composition,  and  at  least  a  flavour  of  classical  learn- 
ing 2.  They  were  indeed  the  main  intermediaries  between  the 
learned  and  the  vernacular  letters  of  their  day  ;  the  spilth  of 
their  wit  and  wisdom  is  to  be  found  in  the  burlesque  Latin  verse 
of  such  collections  as  the  Carrnina  Bur  ana,  riotous  lines,  by  no 
means  devoid  of  poetry,  with  their  half-humorous  half-pathetic 
burden, 

'  In  taberna  quando  sumus 
Non  curamus  quid  sit  humus3.' 

And  especially  they  were  satirists,  satirists  mainly  of  the 
hypocrisy,  cupidity  and  evil  living  of  those  in  the  high  places 
of  the  Church,  for  whom  they  conceived  a  grotesque  expression 
in  Bishop  Golias,  a  type  of  materialistic  prelate,  in  whose 
name  they  wrote  and  whose  pueri  or  discipuli  they  declared 
themselves  to  be  4.     Goliardi,  goliardenses,  their  reputation  in 

1  Gautier,  ii.  42 ;  Be'dier,  389 ;  verse  are  Schmeller,  Carrnina 
Ten  Brink,  i.  186;  Ducange,  s.vv.  Burana  (ed.  3,  1894),  and  T.Wright, 
Colia,  &c;  O.  Hubatsch,  Lat.  Va-  Latin  Poems  attributed  to  Walter 
gantenlieder des  Mittelalters  (1870).  Mapes  (C.  S.  1 841):  for  others  cf. 

2  Le  Dfyartement  des  Livres  Hubatsch,  16.  Latin  was  not  un- 
(Me"on,  N.  R.  i.  404) :  known  amongst  lay  minstrels  :    cf. 

'  A  Bouvines  delez  Dinant  Deus   Bordeors    Ribauz   (Montai- 

Li  perdi-je  Ovide  le  grant  .  .  .  glon-Raynaud,  i.  3)  : 
Mon  Lucan  et  mon  Juvenal  '  Mais  ge  sai  aussi  bien  conter, 

Oubliai-je  a  Bonival,  Et  en  roumanz  et  en  latin.' 

Eustace  le  grant  et  Virgile  *  Hubatsch,    15.        The    origin, 

Perdi  aus  dez  a  Abeville.'  precise  meaning,  and  mutual  rela- 

8  The  chief  collections  of  goliardic  tions  of  the  terms  Golias,  goliardi 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE 


61 


the  eyes  of  the  ecclesiastical  authorities  was  of  the  worst,  and 
their  ill  practices  are  coupled  with  those  of  the  minstrels  in 
many  a  condemnatory  decree  1. 

It  is  not  with  the  goliardi  then,  that  Thomas  de  Cabham's 
relaxation  of  the  strict  ecclesiastical  rigours  is  concerned. 
Neither  is  it,  naturally  enough,  with  the  lower  minstrels  of  the 
mimns  tradition.  Towards  these  Thomas  de  Cabham,  like 
his  predecessors,  is  inexorable.  And  even  of  the  higher  min- 
strels the  musicians  and  singers,  his  toleration  has  its  limits. 
He  discriminates.  In  a  sense,  a  social  and  professional  sense, 
all  these  higher  minstrels  fall  into  the  same  class.  But  from 
the  ethical  point  of  view  there  is  a  very  marked  distinction 
amongst  them.    Some  there  are  who  haunt  taverns  and  merry- 


are  uncertain.  Probably  the  goli- 
ardic  literature  arose  in  France, 
rather  than  in  England  with  Walter 
Mapes,  the  attribution  to  whom  of 
many  of  the  poems  is  perhaps  due 
to  a  confusion  of  G[olias]  with 
G[ualterus]  in  the  MSS.  Giraldus 
Cambrensis  (ob.  1217),  Speculum 
Ecclesiae,  says  '  Parasitus  quidam 
Golias  nomine  nostris  diebus  gulo- 
sitate  pariter  et  leccacitate  famosis- 
simus  ...  in  papam  et  curiam 
Romanam  carmina  famosa  .  .  .  evo- 
muit':  but  the  following  note  points 
to  a  much  earlier  origin  for  Golias 
and  his pueri,  and  this  is  upheld  by 
W.  Scherer,  Gesch.  d.  deutsch.  Dich- 
tung  im  II.  unci  12.  Jahrh.  16. 

1  Early  decrees  forbidding  the 
clergy  to  be  ioculatores  are  given  on 
p.  39.  More  precise  is  the  order 
of  Gautier  of  Sens  (t  913)  in  his 
Constitutiones,  c.  13  (Mansi,  xviii. 
324) '  Statuimus  quod  clerici  ribaldi, 
maxime  qui  dicuntur  de  familia 
Goliae,  perepiscopos,archidiaconos, 
officiates,  et  decanos  Christianitatis, 
tonderi  praecipianturveletiam  radi, 
ita  quod  eis  non  remaneat  tonsura 
clericalis :  ita  tamen  quod  sine 
periculo  et  scandalo  ita  fiant.'  If 
Mansi's  date  is  right,  this  precedes 
by  three  centuries  the  almost  iden- 
tical Cone,  of  Rouen,  c.  8  (Mansi, 
xxiii.  215),  and  Cone,  of  Castle 
Gonther    (Tours),    c.    21    (Mansi, 


xxiii.  237),  both  in  1231.  Gautier, 
Les  Tropaires,  i.  186,  dwells  on 
the  influence  of  the  goliardi  on  the 
late  and  ribald  development  of  the 
tropes,  and  quotes  Cone,  of  Treves 
(1227),  c.  9  (Mansi,  xxiii.  33)  'prae- 
cipimus  ut  omnes  sacerdotes  non 
permittant  trutannos  et  alios  vagos 
scholares  aut  goliardos  cantare 
versus  super  Sanctits  et  Agnus  Dei.' 
On  their  probable  share  in  the  Feast 
of  Fools  cf.  ch.  xiv.  For  later  legis- 
lation cf.  Hubatsch,  14,  95,  and  the 
passage  from  the  Liber  Sextus  of 
Boniface  VIII  on  p.  39.  It  lasts  to 
the  Cone.  Frisingense  (1440)  '  sta- 
tuimus ne  clerici  mimis,  iocula- 
toribus,  histrionibus,  buffonibus, 
galliardis,  largiantur'  (Labbe,  xiii. 
1 286).  By  this  time  'goliard  '  seems 
little  more  than  a  synonym  for 
'minstrel.'  The  'mynstralle,  a 
gulardous,'  of  Mannyng,  148,  does 
not  appear  to  be  a  clerk,  while 
Chaucer's  'goliardeys'  is  the  Miller 
(C.  T.  prol.  560).  On  the  other 
hand,  Langland's  'Goliardeys,  a 
glotoun  of  wordes'  {Piers  Plowman, 
prol.  139),  speaks  Latin.  Another 
name  for  the  goliardi  occurs  in  an 
Epistola  Guidonis  S.  Laurentii  in 
Lucina  Cardinalis,\x  (1266,  Hartz- 
heim,  iii.  807)  against '  vagi  scolares, 
qui  Eberdini  vocantur,'  and  who 
'  divinum  invertunt  officium,  unde 
laici  scandalizantur.' 


62  MINSTRELSY 

makings  with  loose  songs  of  love  and  dalliance.  These  it  is 
not  to  be  expected  that  the  holy  mother  Church  should  in  any- 
way countenance.  Her  toleration  must  be  reserved  for  those 
more  reputable  performers  who  find  material  for  their  ve.rse 
either  in  the  life  and  conversation  of  the  saints  and  martyrs 
themselves,  or  at  least  in  the  noble  and  inspiring  deeds  of 
national  heroes  and  champions.  Legends  of  the  saints  and 
gests  of  princes  :  if  the  minstrels  will  confine  themselves  to 
the  celebration  of  these,  then,  secure  in  the  pronouncement  of 
a  pope,  they  may  claim  a  hearing  even  from  the  devout.  It 
would  be  rash  to  assert  that  even  the  comparatively  liberal 
theory  of  Thomas  de  .Cabham  certainly  justified  in  all  cases 
the  practice  of  the  monasteries.  But  it  is  at  least  noteworthy 
that  in  several  instances  where  the  subjects  of  the  minstrelsy 
presented  for  the  delectation  of  a  cowled  audience  remain 
upon  record,  they  do  fall  precisely  within  the  twofold  defini- 
tion which  he  lays  down.  At  Winchester  in  1338  the  minstrel 
/Herbert  sang  the  song  of  Colbrond  (or  Guy  of  Warwick),  and 
the  gest  of  the  miraculous  deliverance  of  Queen  Emma ; 
while  at  Bicester  in  1432  it  was  the  legend  of  the  Seven 
Sleepers  of  Ephesus  that  made  the  Epiphany  entertainment 
of  the  assembled  canons. 

If  now  we  set  aside  the  very  special  class  of  ribald  galiardi, 
and  if  we  set  aside  also  the  distinction  drawn  by  Thomas  de 
Cabham  on  purely  ethical  grounds  between  the  minstrels  of 
the  love-songs  and  the  minstrels  of  saintly  or  heroic  gest,  the 
net  result  is  the  twofold  classification  of  higher  and  lower 
minstrels  already  familiar  to  us.  Roughly — it  must  always  be 
borne  in  mind  how  roughly — it  corresponds  on  the  one  hand 
to  the  difference  between  the  Teutonic  and  the  Roman  tradi- 
tion, on  the  other  to  the  distinction  between  the  established 
'  minstrel  of  honour '  and  his  unattached  rival  of  the  road. 
And  there  is  abundant  evidence  that  such  a  distinction  was 
generally  present,  and  occasionally  became  acute,  in  the  con- 
sciousness of  the  minstrels  themselves.  The  aristocrats  of 
minstrelsy,  a  Baudouin  or  a  Jean  de  Conde,  or  a  Watriquet  de 
Couvin,  have  very  exalted  ideas  as  to  the  dignity  of  their 
profession.  They  will  not  let  you,  if  they  can  help  it,  put  the 
grans  menestreus  on  the  same   level  with   every-day  Jang- 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE 


63 


Icttr  of  poor  attainments  and  still  poorer  repute l.  In  the  Dit 
des  Tabotireurs  again  it  is  a  whole  class,  the  joncurs  de  viellc, 
who  arise  to  vindicate  their  dignity  and  to  pour  scorn  upon 
the  humble  and  uninstructed  drummers  2.  But  the  most  in- 
structive and  curious  evidence  comes  from  Provence.  It  was 
in  1273,  wnen  the  amazing  growth  of  Provencal  poetry  was 
approaching  its  sudden  decay,  that  the  last  of  the  great  trouba- 
dours, Guiraut  de  Riquier,  addressed  a  verse  Supplicatio  to 
Alphonso  X  of  Castile  on  the  state  of  minstrelsy.  He  points 
out  the  confusion  caused  by  the  indiscriminate  grouping  of 
poets,  singers,  and  entertainers  of  all  degrees  under  the  title 
oi  joglars,  and  begs  the  king,  as  high  patron  of  letters,  to  take 
order  for  it.  A  reply  from  Alphonso,  also  in  verse,  and  also, 
one  may  suspect,  due  to  the  fertile  pen  of  Guiraut  Riquier, 
is  extant.  Herein  he  establishes  or  confirms  a  fourfold 
hierarchy.  At  the  head  come  two  classes,  the  doctors  de 
trobar  and  the  trobaires,  who  are  composers,  the  former  of 
didactic,  the  latter  of  ordinary  songs  and  melodies.  Beneath 
these  are  the  joglars  proper,  instrumentalists  and  reciters  of 
delightful  stories,  and  beneath  these  again  the  bufos,  the  enter- 
tainers of  common  folk,  who  have  really  no  claim  to  be  con- 
sidered as  joglars  .at  all  3.  One  of  the  distinctions  here  made 
is  new  to  us.  The  difference  between  doctor  de  trobar  and 
trobaire  is  perhaps  negligible.     But  that  between  the  trobaire 


1  BaudouindeCondeinhisGw/^.r 
des  Hiraus  contrasts  the  '  grans 
menestreus,'  the 

'  Maistres  de  sa  menestrandie, 

Qui  bien  viele  ou  ki  bien  die 

De  bouce ' 
with  the  'felons   et  honteux,' who 
win  pence, 

Tun  por  faire  l'ivre, 

L'autre  le  cat,  le  tiers  le  sot,' 

while  in  Les  fctats  du  Monde  his 

son  Jean  sets  up  a  high  standard 

of  behaviour  for  the  true  minstrels  : 

'  Soies  de  cuer  nes  et  polis, 

Courtois,  envoisies,  et  jolis, 

Pour  les  boinnes  gens  solacier' 
(Scheler,  Dits  et  Contes  de  Bau- 
donin  de  Condd  et  de  son  fits  Jean 
deConde",  i.  154;  ii.  377).  Cf.  Watri- 
quet  de  Couvin,  Dis  dufot  menestrel 
(ed.  Scheler,  367)  : 


1  Menestriex  se  doit  maintenir 
Plus     simplement     c'une     pu- 

C-Cltj«     •   •   • 

Menestrel  qui  veut   son    droit 

faire 
Ne  doit  le  jangleur  contrefaire, 
Mais  en  sa  bouche  avoir  tous  dis 
Douces  paroles  et  biaus  dis, 
Estre  nds,  vivre  purement.' 
These  three  writers  belong  to  the 
end  of  the  thirteenth  and  the  begin- 
ning of  the  fourteenth  century. 

2  A.  ]ubina.l,  Jongleurs  et  Trou- 
veres,  165.  Cf.  Gautier,  ii.  78 ; 
Bedier,  418. 

3  F.  Diaz,  Poesie  der  Trouba- 
dours (ed.  Bartsch),  63 ;  K.  Bartsch, 
Grundriss  der  provensalischen 
Litcratur,  25  ;  F.  Hueffer,  The 
Troubadours,  63.  Diaz,  op-  at.  297, 
prints  the  documents. 


64  MINSTRELSY 

or  composer  and  the  joglar  or  executant  of  poetry,  is  an 
important  one.  It  is  not,  however,  so  far  as  the  Teutonic 
element  in  minstrelsy  goes,  primitive.  The  scopas  and  the 
French  or  Anglo-Norman  ioculatores  up  to  the  twelfth  century 
composed  their  verses  as  a  class,  and  sang  them  as  well  \  In 
Provence,  however,  the  Teutonic  element  in  minstrelsy  must 
have  been  of  the  slightest,  and  perhaps  the  Roman  tradition, 
illustrated  by  the  story  of  Laberius,  of  a  marked  barrier 
between  composing  and  executing,  had  vaguely  lingered.  At 
any  rate  it  is  in  Provence,  in  the  eleventh  century,  that  the 
distinction  between  trobaire  and  joglar  makes  its  appearance. 
It  never  became  a  very  complete  one.  The  trobaire  was 
generally,  not  always,  of  gentle  or  burgess  birth  ;  sometimes 
actually  a  king  or  noble.  In  the  latter  case  he  contented 
himself  with  writing  his  songs,  and  let  the  joglar s  spread  them 
abroad.  But  the  bulk  of  the  trobaires  lived  by  their  art. 
They  wandered  from  castle  to  castle,  alone  with  a  vielle,  or 
With,  joglar s  in  their  train,  and  although  they  mingled  with  their 
hosts  on  fairly  equal  terms,  they  did  not  disdain  to  take  their 
rewards  of  horse  or  mantle  or  jewel,  just  like  any  common 
performer.  Moreover,  they  confined  themselves  to  lyric 
poetry,  leaving  the  writing  of  epic,  so  far  as  epic  was  abroad  in 
Provence,  to  the  joglars  2.  From  Provence,  the  trobaire  spread 
to  other  countries,  reappearing  in  the  north  of  France  and 
England  as  the  trouvere.  We  seem  to  trace  an  early  trouvere 
in  Lucas  de  Barre  in  the  time  of  Henry  I.  But  it  is  Eleanor 
of  Poitiers,  daughter  of  the  trobaire  count  William  of  Poitiers, 
and  mother  of  the  trouvere  Richard  Cceur  de  Lion,  who 
appears  as  the  chief  intermediary  between  north  and  south. 
The  intrusion  of  the  trouvere  was  the  first  step  in  the  degrada- 
tion of  minstrelsy.  Amongst  the  Anglo-Saxons,  even  apart 
from  the  cantilenae  of  the  folk,  the  professional  singer  had 
no  monopoly  of  song.  Hrothgar  and  Alfred  harped  with  their 
scopas.     But  if  there  had  been  a  similar  tendency  amongst  the 

1  There  is  nothing  to  show  that  ii.  2.  15;  Gautier,  ii.  45,  58.    The 

Scilling,  the  companion  of  Widsith  commonest    of  phrases  in  trouba- 

(Widsith,  104),  was  of  an  inferior  dour  biography  is  '  cantet  et  trobet.' 

gra(je.  The  term  trobador  is  properly  the 

3  2  Hueffer,   52;    G.    Paris,    182:  accusative  case  of  trobaire. 
A.  Stimming  in  Grober's  Grundriss, 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  65 

continental  Teutons  who  merged  in  the  French  and  Norman- 
French,  it  had  been  checked  by  the  complete  absorption  of 
all  literary  energies,  outside  the  minstrel  class,  in  neo-Latin. 
It  was  not  until  the  twelfth  century,  and  as  has  been 
said,  under  Provencal  influence,  that  secular-minded  clerks, 
and  exceptionally  educated  nobles,  merchants,  or  officials, 
began  to  devote  themselves  to  the  vernacular,  and  by  so  doing 
to  develop  the  trouvere  type.  The  trouvere  had  the  advan- 
tage of  the  minstrel  in  learning  and  independence,  if  not  in 
leisure  ;  and  though  the  latter  long  held  his  own  by  the  side 
of  his  rival,  he  was  fated  in  the  end  to  give  way,  and  to  con- 
tent himself  with  the  humbler  task  of  spreading  abroad  what 
the  trouvire  wrote  \  By  the  second  quarter  of  the  fourteenth 
century,  the  conquest  of  literature  by  the  bourgeoisie  was  com- 
plete. The  interest  had  shifted  from  the  minstrel  on  the  hall 
floor  to  the  burgher  or  clerk  in  the  puy ;  the  prize  of  a  success- 
ful poem  was  no  longer  a  royal  mantle,  but  a  laureate  crown  or 
the  golden  violet  of  the  jcux  floraux  ;  and  its  destiny  less  to 
be  recited  at  the  banquet,  than  read  in  the  bower.  In  England 
the  completion  of  the  process  perhaps  came  a  little  later,  and 
was  coincident  with  the  triumph  of  English,  the  tongue  of  the 
bourgeois,  over  French,  the  tongue  of  the  noble.  The  full 
flower  of  minstrelsy  had  been  the  out-at-elbows  vagabond, 
Rutebeuf.  The  full  flower  of  the  trouvere  is  the  comptroller 
of  the  customs  and  subsidies  of  the  port  of  London,  Geoffrey 
Chaucer. 

The  first  distinction,  then,  made  by  Guiraut  Riquier,  that 
between  Irobairc  andjog/ar,  implies  a  development  from  within 
minstrelsy  itself  that  was  destined  one  day  to  overwhelm  it. 
But  the  second,  that  between  the j'og/ar  and  the  bufo,  is  precisely 
the  one  already  familiar  to   us,  between  the  minstrels  of  the 

1  Petrarch,   Epist.  Rerum  Senil.  cuniasquaerunt,et  vestes  et  munera.' 

v.  3  '  sunt  homines  non  magni  inge-  Fulke    of    Marseilles,      afterwards 

nii,magnae  vero  memoriae,  magnae-  bishop  of  Toulouse,  wrote  songs  in 

que  diligentiae,   sed  maioris  auda-  his  youth.     He  became  an  austere 

ciae,  qui  regum  ac  potentum  aulas  Cistercian  ;   but   the   songs  had  got 

frequentant,  de  proprio  nudi,  vestiti  abroad,  and  whenever  he  heard  one 

autem  carminibus  alienis,  dumque  of  them  sung  by  a  joglar^  he  would 

quid  ab  hoc,  aut  ab  illo  exquisitius  eat  only  bread  and  water  [Scrmooi 

materno  praesertim  charactere  die-  Robert    de    Sorbonne  in   Haureau, 

turn  sit,  ingenti  expressione  pronun-  Man.  Fr.  xxiv.  2.  2S6). 
ciant,  gratiam  sibi  nobilium,  et  PC- 
chambers.  1                                            F 


66  MINSTRELSY 

scdp  and  the  minstrels  of  the  mimus  tradition.  And,  as  has 
been  said,  it  is  partly,  if  not  entirely,  identical  with  that 
which  grew  up  in  course  of  time  between  the  protected 
minstrels  of  the  court  and  of  great  men's  houses,  and  their 
vagrant  brethren  of  the  road.  This  general  antithesis  between 
the  higher  and  lower  mintrelsy  may  now,  perhaps,  be  regarded 
as  established.  It  was  the  neglect  of  it,  surely,  that  led  to 
that  curious  and  barren  logomachy  between  Percy  and  Ritson, 
in  which  neither  of  the  disputants  can  be  said  to  have  had 
hold  of  more  than  a  bare  half  of  the  truth1.  And  it  runs 
through  the  whole  history  of  minstrelsy.  It  became  acute, 
no  doubt,  with  the  growth  in  importance  of  the  minstrels 
of  honour  in  the  thirteenth  and  fourteenth  centuries.  But 
it  had  probably  been  just  as  acute,  if  not  more  so,  at  the 
very  beginning  of  things,  when  the  clash  of  Teutonic  and 
Roman  civilization  first  brought  the  bard  face  to  face  with  the 
serious  rivalry  of  the  mime.  Bard  and  mime  merged  without 
ever  becoming  quite  identical ;  and  even  at  the  moment  when 
this  process  was  most  nearly  complete,  say  in  the  eleventh 
century,  the  jouglerie  seigneuriale \  to  use  Magnin's  happy 
terms,  was  never  quite  the  same  thing  as  the  jouglerie  foraine 
et  populaire 2,  least  of  all  in  a  country  like  England  where 
differences  of  tongue  went  to  perpetuate  and  emphasize  the 
breach. 

Nevertheless,  the  antithesis  may  easily  be  pushed  too  far. 
After  all,  the  minstrels  were  entertainers,  and  therefore  their 
business  was  to  entertain.  Did  the  lord  yawn  over  a  gest  or  a 
saintly  legend  ?  the  discreet  minstrel  would  be  well  advised  to 

1  In  the  first  edition  of  his  Reliques  the  two,  for  neither  appreciated  the 

(1765),    Percy   gave  the  mediaeval  wide  variety  covered  by  a  common 

minstrel   as    high  a   status  as  the  name.      On     the    controversy,    cf. 

Norse   scald  or  Anglo-Saxon  scop.  Minto  in  Enc.  Brit.  s.  v.  Minstrels, 

This  led  to  an  acrid  criticism  by  Courthope,   i.   426-31.   and    H.  B. 

Ritson   who,  in   his  essay  On  the  Wheatley's   Introduction  to  his  edi- 

ancient  English  Minstrels  in  An-  tion    of    Percy's    Reliques,  xiii-xv. 

cient    Songs    and  Ballads   (1829),  Percy  in  his  later  editions  profited 

easily  showed   the   low   repute    in  largely    by    Ritson's    criticism;    a 

which   many  minstrels  were  held,  careful  collation  of  these  is  given 

See  also  his  elaborate  Dissertation  in  Schroer's  edition  (1889). 
on  Romance  and  Minstrelsy  in  his         2  Magnin,  Journal  des  Savants 

Ancient  English  Metrical  Romances  (1846),  545. 
( 1 802).  The  truth  really  lay  between 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  67 

drop  high  art,  and  to  substitute  some  less  exacting,  even  if 
less  refined  fashion  of  passing  the  time.  The  instincts  of  boor 
and  baron  were  not  then,  of  course,  so  far  apart  as  they  are 
nowadays.  And  as  a  matter  of  fact  we  find  many  of  the 
most  eminent  minstrels  boasting  of  the  width  and  variety  of 
their  accomplishments.  Thus  of  Baudouin  II,  count  of  Guisnes 
(i  169-1206),  it  is  recorded  that  he  might  have  matched  the 
most  celebrated  professionals,  not  only  in  chansons  de  gestes 
and  romans  daventure  but  also  in  the  fabliaux  which  formed 
the  delight  of  the  vulgar  bourgeoisie  \  Less  aristocratic  per- 
formers descended  even  lower  than  Baudouin  de  Guisnes.  If 
we  study  the  repertoires  of  such  Jongleurs  as  the  diabolic  one  in 
Gautier  de  Coincy's  miracle2,  or  Daurel  in  the  romance  of 
Daurel et Betonz,  or  the  disputants  who  vaunt  their  respective 
proficiencies  in  Des  Deus  Bordeors  Ribauz*,  we  shall  find  that 
they  cover  not  only  every  conceivable  form  of  minstrel  literature 
proper,  but  also  tricks  with  knives  and  strings,  sleight  of  hand, 
dancing  and  tumbling.  Even  in  Provence,  the  Enseignamens 
for  joglars  warn  their  readers  to  learn  the  arts  of  imitating 
birds,  throwing  knives,  leaping  through  hoops,  showing  off  per- 
forming asses  and  dogs,  and  dangling  marionettes  5.     So  that 

1  Lambertus  Ardensis,  Chronicon,         Pueis  pres  l[a]  arpa,  a  .ij.  laisses 
c.  81  (ed.  Godefroy  Menilglaise,  1 75)  notatz, 

'  quid  plura  ?  tot  et  tantorum  ditatus  Et  ab  la  viola  a  los  gen  depor- 

est  copia  librorum  ut  Augustinum  tat[z], 

in   theologia,  Areopagitam  Diony-  Sautaetomba;  tuh  s'en  son  ale- 

sium  in  philosophia,  Milesium  fabu-  gratz.'_ 

larium  in  naeniis  gentium,  in  canti-  4  Montaiglon-Raynaud,  i.  I  : 

lenis    gestoriis,    sive    in   eventuris  '  Ge  sai  contes,  ge  sai  flabeax ; 

nobilium,  sive  etiam  in  fabellis  igno-  Ge  sai  conter  beax  dix  noveax, 

bilium,   ioculatores  quosque   nomi-  Rotruenges  viez  et  noveles, 

natissimos  aequiparare  putaretur.'  Et  sirventois  et  pastorels. 

2  F 'reymond,  Jongleurs  et  Menes-  Ge  sai  le  flabel  du  Denier, 
tre Is,  34  :  ...._. 

'  II  est  de  tout  bons  menesterieux :  Si  sai  de  Parceval  l'estoire, 

II  set  peschier,  il  set  chacier,  

II  set  trop  bien  genz  solacier  ;  Ge  sai  joer  des  baasteax, 

II  set  chancons,  sonnez  et  fables,  Et  si  sai  joer  des  costeax, 

II  set  d'eschez,  il  set  des  tables,  Et  de  la  corde  et  de  la  fonde, 

II  set  d'arbalestre  et  d'airon.'  Et  de  toz  les  beax  giex  du  monde, 

3  Daurel  et  Beton    (ed.    Meyer,  

Soc.  des  anc.  textes  fr.  1886),  1206  :  De  totes  les  chansons  dc  geste.' 

1  El  va  enant,  a  lor  des  jocz  mos-  6  Three  of  these  Enseignamens, 

tratz,  by   Guiraut   de   Cabreira   (tii7o), 

Dels  us  e  dels  altres,  qu'el  ne  Guiraut  de   Calanso   (t  1200),  and 

sap  pro  asatz.  Bertran    de    Paris    (t  1250),    are 

F  2 


68  MINSTRELSY 

one  discerns  the  difference  between  the  lower  and  the  higher 
minstrels  to  have  been  not  so  much  that  the  one  did  not  sink 
so  low,  as  that  the  other,  for  lack  of  capacity  and  education, 
did  not  rise  so  high. 

The  palmy  days  of  minstrelsy  were  the  eleventh,  twelfth  and 
thirteenth  centuries.  The  germ  of  decay,  however,  which 
appeared  when  the  separation  grew  up  between  trouvere  and 
jongleur,  and  when  men  began  to  read  books  instead  of  listen- 
ing to  recitations,  was  further  developed  by  the  invention  of 
printing.  For  then,  while  the  trouvere  could  adapt  himself 
readily  enough  to  the  new  order  of  things,  the  jongleur1  s  occu- 
pation was  gone.  Like  Benedick  he  might  still  be  talking,  but 
nobody  marked  him.  Eyes  cast  down  over  a  page  of  Chaucer 
or  of  Caxton  had  no  further  glitter  or  tear  for  him  to  win  \ 
The  fifteenth,  and  still  more  the  sixteenth  century,  witness  the 
complete  break-up  of  minstrelsy  in  its  mediaeval  form.  The 
mimes  of  course  endured.  They  survived  the  overthrow  of 
mediaevalism,  as  they  had  survived  the  overthrow  of  the 
Empire  2.  The  Tudor  kings  and  nobles  had  still  their  jugglers, 
their  bearwards,  their  domestic  buffoons,  jesters  or  fools  3. 
Bearbaiting  in  Elizabethan  London  rivalled  the  drama  in  its 
vogue.  Acrobats  and  miscellaneous  entertainers  never  ceased 
to  crowd  to  every  fair,  and  there  is  applause  even  to-day  in 


printed  by  K.  Bartsch,  Denkmdler  adds  :  '  At  hie  tamen  in  praeceptore 

der provenzalischen  Litteratur,  85-  arcendo     diligens,    libenter  patitur 

101.     Cf.    Bartsch,  Grundriss    der  scurras  et  mimos  (qui  digna  lupanari 

prov.  Lit.  25  ;  Hueffer,   The  Trou-  in    sacro    cubiculo    coram   principe 

badours,  66:    Hist.  Litt.  xvii.  581.  cantillent)admitti'  (Echols, Memoir 

1  Bernhard,  iii.  397,  gives  some  of  Hctiry  Fitzroy'vci  Camden  Miscel- 
French  references,  one  dated  1395,  lany,  iii.  xxxviii). 

for   '  menestriers    de    bouches,'     a  3  For  the  ioculator  regis,  cf.  Ap- 

term  signifying  minstrels  who  sang  pendix  E,  and  Leach, Beverley MSS. 

as  well  as  played  instruments.  179.  He  is  called 'jugler' in  N.H.B. 

2  There  are  numerous  payments  67.  Is  he  distinct  from  the  royal 
to  jugglers,  tumblers  and  dancers  in  gestator  (gestour,  jester)  ?  Both 
the  Household  Accounts  of  Henry  appear  in  the  Shrewsbury  accounts 
VII  (Bentley,  Excerpta  Historica,  (s.  ann.  1521,  1549)-  In  1554  both 
85-113  ;  Collier,  i.  50).  A  letter  to  le  jugler  and  le  gester  were  enter- 
Wolsey  of  July  6.  1527,  from  R.  tained.  The  gestator  seems  to  have 
Croke,  the  tutor  of  Henry  VIII's  merged  in  the  stultus  or  court  fool 
natural  son,  the  Duke  of  Richmond,  (ch.  xvi).  The  accounts  in  App.  E 
complains  of  difficulties  put  in  his  often  mention  the  royal  bearward, 
way  by  R.  Cotton,  the  Clerk-comp-  who  remained  an  important  official 
troller  of  the  duke*s  household,  and  under  Elizabeth. 


THE  MINSTREL  LIFE  69 

circus  and  music-hall  for  the  old  jests  and  the  old  somersaults 
that  have  already  done  duty  for  upwards  of  twenty  centuries. 
But  the  jongleur  as  the  thirteenth  century  knew  him  was  by 
the  sixteenth  century  no  more.  Professional  musicians  there 
were  in  plenty  ;  'Sneak's  noise'  haunted  the  taverns  of  East- 
cheap1,  and  instrumentalists  and  vocalists  in  royal  palaces 
and  noble  mansions  still  kept  the  name  and  style  of  minstrels. 
But  they  were  not  minstrels  in  the  old  sense,  for  with  the  pro- 
duction of  literature,  except  perhaps  for  a  song  here  and  there, 
they  had  no  longer  anything  to  do.  That  had  passed  into 
other  hands,  and  even  the  lineaments  of  the  trouverc  are 
barely  recognizable  in  the  new  types  of  poets  and  men  of  letters 
whom  the  Renaissance  produced.  The  old  fashioned  minstrel 
in  his  style  and  habit  as  he  lived,  was  to  be  presented  before 
Elizabeth  at  Kenilworth  as  an  interesting  anachronism  2.  Some 
of  the  discarded  entertainers,  as  we  shall  see,  were  absorbed  into 
the  growing  profession  of  stage-players  ;  others  sunk  to  be  ballad 
singers.  For  to  the  illiterate  the  story-teller  still  continued  to 
appeal.  The  ballad  indeed,  at  least  on  one  side  of  it,  was  the 
detritus,  as  the  lai  had  been  the  germ,  of  romance  3,  and  at 
the  very  moment  when  Spenser  was  reviving  romance  as 
a  conscious  archaism,  it  was  still  possible  for  a  blind  fiddler 
with  a  ballad  to  offend  the  irritable  susceptibilities  of  a  Puritan, 
or  to  touch  the  sensitive  heart-strings  of  a  Sidney4.  But  as 
a  social  and  literary  force,  the  glory  of  minstrelsy  had 
departed 


5 


1  2  Hen.  IV,  ii.  4.  12.  trumpet.     And  yet  is  it  sung  but  by 

2  Cf.  Appendix  H  (i).  some  blind  Crowder, with  no  rougher 

3  Courthope,  i.  445  ;  A.  Lang,  voice  than  rude  style.'  For  the 
s.v.  Ballad  va.  Enc.  Brit,  and  in  A  Puritan  view,  see  Stubbes,  i.  169. 
Collection  of  Ballads,  xi  ;  Quarterly  °  Ritson,  ccxxiv,  quotes  the  follow- 
Review  (July,  1S98)  ;  Henderson,  ing  lines,  ascribed  to  Dr.  Bull 
335;  G.  Smith,  180.  But  I  think  (t  1597),  from  a  Hart.  MS.,  as  the 
that  Gummere,   B.  P.  passim,  sue-  epitaph  of  minstrelsy  : 

ceeds  in  showing  that  the  element  of  'When    Jesus     went    to    Jairus' 

folk-poetry   in  balladry  is  stronger  house 

than  some  of  the  a'bove  writers  re-  (Whose  daughter  was  about  to 

cognize.  dye), 

4  Sidney,    Afiolo^ie  for   Poetric  He  turned  the  minstrels  out  of 
(ed.  Arber),  46    '  Certainly  I  must  doors. 

confess  my  own  barbarousness.     I  Among  the  rascal  company  : 

never  heard  the  old  song  of  Percy  Beggars    they    are,     with     one 

and  Douglas,  that  I   found  not  my  consent, 

heart    moved    more    than    with    a  And  rogues,by  Act  of  Parliament.' 


CHAPTER  IV 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY 

THE  floor  of  a  mediaeval  court,  thronged  with  minstrels  of 
every  degree,  provided  at  least  as  various  an  entertainment 
as  the  Roman  stage  itself 1.  The  performances  of  the  mimes, 
to  the  accompaniment  of  their  despised  tabor  or  wry-necked 
fife,  undoubtedly  made  up  in  versatility  for  what  they  lacked 
in  decorum.  There  were  the  tombeors,  tombcstercs  or  tumbleres, 
acrobats  and  contortionists,  who  twisted  themselves  into  incre- 
dible attitudes,  leapt  through  hoops,  turned  somersaults,  walked 
on  their  heads,  balanced  themselves  in  perilous  positions. 
Female  tumblers,  tomatriccs,  took  part  in  these  feats,  and 
several  districts  had  their  own  characteristic  modes  of  tumbling, 
such  as  le  tour  francais,  le  tour  romain,  le  tour  de  C/iampenots2.* 
Amongst  the  tombeors  must  be  reckoned  the  rarer  funambuli 

1  Du    Vilain  au  Buffet   (Mont-  Plowman,  Passus  xvi.  205  : 

aiglon-Raynaud,  iii.  202) :  '  Ich  can  nat  tabre  ne  trompe  "  ne 

'  Li  quens  manda  les  menestrels,  telle  faire  gestes, 

Et  si  a  fet  crier  entr'els  Farten,  ne  fithelen  ■  at  festes,  ne 

Qui  la  meillor  truffe  sauroit  harpen, 

Dire  ne  fere,  qu'il  auroit  Iapen   ne   iogelen  '  ne  gentel- 

Sa  robe  d'escarlate  nueve.  liche  pipe, 

L'uns  menestrels  a  l'autre  rueve  Nother  sailen  ne  sautrien  ■  ne 

Fere  son  mestier,  tel  qu'il  sot,  singe  with  the  giterne.' 

L'uns  fet  l'ivre,  l'autre  le  sot ;  2  Gautier,   ii.   63  ;     Strutt,    207. 

Li  uns  chante,  li  autres  note,  L.  T.  Smith,  Derby  Accounts  (Cam- 

Et  li  autres  dit  la  riote,  den  Soc),  109,  records  a  payment 

Et  li  autres  la  jenglerie  ;  by  Henry  of  Bolingbroke  when  in 

Cil  qui  sevent  de  jouglerie  Prussia   in    1390-1    'cuidam   tum- 

Vielent  par  devant  le  conte  ;  blere  facienti  ministralciam  suam.' 

Aucuns  i  a  qui  fabliaus  conte,  See  miniatures  of  tumblers  (Strutt, 

Ou  il  ot  mainte  gaberie,  211,  212),  stilt-dancing  (ibid.  226), 

Et  li  autres  dit  YErberie,  hoop-vaulting  (ibid.  229),  balancing 

La  oil  il  ot  mainte  risee.'  (ibid.  232-4),  a  contortionist  (ibid. 

Cf.  p.  67  ;    also  the  similar  list  in  235). 
Wace,    Brut,     10S23,    and     Piers 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY 


71 


or  rope-walkers,  such  as  he  whom  the  Corvei  annals  record 
to  have  met  with  a  sorry  accident  in  the  twelfth  century1, 
or  he  who  created  such  a  furore  in  the  thirteenth  by  his 
aerial  descent  from  the  cathedral  at  Basle2.  Nor  are  they 
very  distinct  from  the  crowd  of  dancers,  male  and  female,  who 
are  variously  designated  as  saltatores  and  saltatrices,  '  sau- 
tours,'  '  sailyours,'  '  hoppesteres.'  Indeed,  in  many  medi- 
aeval miniatures,  the  daughter  of  Herodias,  dancing  before 
Herod,  is  represented  rather  as  tumbling  or  standing  on  her 
head  than  in  any  more  subtle  pose  3.  A  second  group  includes 
the  jugglers  in  the  narrower  sense,  the  jouers  des  costeax  who 
tossed  and  caught  knives  and  balls  4,  and  the  practitioners  of 
sleight  of  hand,  who  generally  claimed  to  proceed  by  nigre- 
mance  or  sorcery  5.  The  two  seem  to  have  shared  the  names 
of  prestigiatores  or  tregetours  6.  Other  mimes,  the  bastaxi, 
ox  jotters  des  baste  ax,  brought  round,  like  the  Punch  and  Judy 
men  of  our  own  day,  little  wooden  performing  puppets  or 
marionettes7.  Others,  to  whom  Thomas  de  Cabham  more 
particularly  refers,  came  in  masked  as  animals,  and  played  the 
dog,  the  ass  or  the  bird  with  appropriate  noises  and  behaviour8. 


1  Annates  Corbeienses,  s.  a.  1135 
(Leibnitz,  Rer.  Brunsv.  Script,  ii. 
307)  'funambulus  inter  lusus  suos 
in  terrain  deiectus.' 

2  Gautier,  ii.  64,  quotes  Annates 
Basilienses,  s.a.  1276  'Basileam 
quidam  corpore  debilis  venit,  qui 
funem  protensum  de  campanili 
maioris  ecclesiae  ad  domum  can- 
toris manibus  et  pedibus  descende- 
bat ' ;  for  later  English  examples 
cf.  ch.  xxiv. 

3  Strutt,  172, 176, 209;  Jusserand, 
i.  214,  and  E.  W.  L.  23. 

4  Strutt,  173,  197;  Jusserand, 
E.  W.  L.  212  ;  Wright,  33-7. 

5  Gautier,  ii.  67,  quotes  Joufrois, 
1 146  : 

1  Ainz  veissiez  toz  avant  traire 
Les  jogleors  et  maint  jou  faire. 
Li  uns  dan^oit  .  .  . 
Li  autre  ovrent  de  nigremance.' 

6  Strutt,  194,  quotes  from  Cott. 
MS.  Nero,  c.  viii,  a  payment  'Ja- 
nins  le  Cheveretter  (bagpiper) 
called   le   Tregettour,'  for   playing 


before  Edw.  II.   Collier,  i.  30,  quotes 

Lydgate,  Daunce  de  Macabre  (Harl. 

116): 

'  Maister  John  Rykell,  sometyme 

tregitoure 

Of  noble  Henry  kynge  of  Eng- 

londe, 
And    of   Fraunce   the   myghty 

conqueroure, 
For  all  the  sleightes  and  turn- 

yngs  of  thyne  honde, 
Thou    must    come     nere    this 
daunce  to  understonde. 

Lygarde  de  mayne  now  helpeth 
me  right  nought.' 

7  Ducange(  s.  v.  bastaxi ;  Gau- 
tier, ii.  11;  C.  Magnin,  Hist,  des 
Marionnettes  en  Europe  (ed.2,iS62); 
cf.  ch.  xxiv.  Bastaxus  seems  to  be 
the  origin  of  the  modern  bateleur, 
used  in  a  wide  sense  of  travelling 
entertainers. 

8  Du  Meril,  Com.  74;  Strutt, 
253  ;  Jusserand,  E.  W.  L.  vi.  218. 
Amongst  the  letters  commendatory 


72  MINSTRELSY 

Others,  again,  led  round  real  animals  ;  generally  bears  or  apes, 
occasionally  also  horses,  cocks,  hares,  dogs,  camels  and  even 
lions 1.  Sometimes  these  beasts  did  tricks  ;  too  often  they  were 
baited  2,  and  from  time  to  time  a  man,  lineal  descendant  of  the 
imperial  gladiators,  would  step  forward  to  fight  with  them  3.  To 
the  gladiatorial  shows  may  perhaps  also  be  traced  the  fight 
with  wooden  swords  which  often  formed  a  part  of  the  fun.4  And, 
finally,  whatever  the  staple  of  the  performance,  there  was  the 
parade  or  preliminary  patter  to  call  the  audience  together,  and 
throughout  the  '  carping,'  a  continuous  flow  of  rough  witticism 
and  repartee,  such  as  one  is  accustomed  to  hear  Joey,  the 
clown,  in  the  pauses  of  a  circus,  pass  off  on  Mr.  Harris,  the 
ring-master5.  Here  came  in  the  especial  talents  of  the 
scurra,  bordcor  or  japere,  to  whom  the  moralists  took  such 
marked  exception.  '  L'uns  fet  tivre,  V autre  le  sot,'  says  the 
fabliau  ;  and  indeed  we  do  not  need  the  testimony  of  Thomas 
de  Cabham  or  of  John  of  Salisbury  to  conclude  that  such 
buffoonery  was  likely  to  be  of  a  ribald  type  6. 

Even  in  the  high  places  of  minstrelsy  there  was  some  mea- 
sure of  variety.     A  glance  at  the  pay-sheet  of  Edward  I's 

of  minstrels  quoted  by  Gautier,  ii.  The  minstrelles  synge,  the  joge- 

1 09,  is  one  '  De  illo  qui  scit  volucrum  lours  carpe.' 

exprimere  cantilenas  et  voces  asi-  6  John  of  Salisbury,  Polycraticus, 

ninas.'     Baudouin  de  Conde"  men-  i.  8  '  Quorum  adeo  error  invaluit, 

tions  a  minstrel  who  'fait  le  cat'  ut  a  praeclaris  domibus  non  arcean- 

(cf.  p.  63,  n.  1).  tur,  etiam  illi  qui  obscenis  partibus 

1  See  figures  of  bears  (Strutt,  corporis  oculis  omnium  earn  inge- 
176,  214,  239,  240),  apes  (ibid.  240,  runt  turpitudinem,  quam  erubescat 
241  ;  Jusserand,  E.  IV.  L.  218),  videre  vel  cynicus.  Quodque  magis 
horses  (Strutt,  243,  244),  dog  (ibid,  mirere,  nee  tunc  eiiciuntur,  quando 
246,  249),  hare  (ibid.  248),  cock  tumultuantes  inferius  crebro  sonitu 
(ibid.  249).  For  the  ursarius  and  aerem  foedant,  et  turpiter  inclusum 
for  lion,  marmoset,  &c,  cf.  pp.  53,  turpius  produnt';  Adam  of  Bremen 
68,  and  Appendix  E.  (M.  G.  H-),  iii.  38  '  Pantomimi,  qui 

2  Strutt,  256.  A  horse-baiting  is  obscoenis  corporis  motibus  oble- 
figured  in  Strutt,  243.  ctare  vulgus  solent.'     Raine,  Hist. 

3  Strutt,  244,  figures  a  combat  Papers  from  Northern  Registers 
between  man  and  horse.  Gautier,  (R.  S.),  398,  prints  a  letter  of 
ii.  66,  cites  Ada  SS.  Jan.  iii.  257  Archbishop  Zouche  of  York  on  the 
for  the  intervention  of"  St.  Poppo  indecent  behaviour  of  some  clerks 
when  a  naked  man  smeared  with  of  the  bishop  of  Durham  in  York 
honey  was  to  fight  bears  before  the  Minster  on  Feb.  6,  1349, 'subtus 
emperor  Henry  IV  (t  1048).  imaginem  crucifixi  ventositates  per 

4  Strutt,  260,  262.  posteriora  dorsi  cum  foedo  strepitu 

5  Adam  Davie  (t  1312) :  more  ribaldorum  emittere  fecerunt 
'  Merry  it  is  in  halle  to  here  the      pluries  ac  turpiter  et  sonore.' 

harpe, 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       73 

Whitsuntide  feast  will  show  that  the  minstrels  who  aspired  to 
be  musicians  were  habitually  distinguished  by  the  name  of  the 
musical  instrument  on  which  they  played.  They  are  vidula- 
torcs,  citharistac,  trumpatores,  vilours,  gigours,  crouderesy 
har pours,  citolers,  lu  tours,  truntpours,  tabor  curs  and  the  like. 
The  harp  (cithara),  played  by  twitching  the  strings,  had  been 
the  old  instrument  of  the  Teutons,  but  in  the  Middle  Ages  it 
came  second  in  popularity  to  the  vielle  (vidula),  which  was 
also  a  string  instrument,  but,  like  the  modern  fiddle,  was  played 
with  a  bow.  The  drum  {tympakum,  tabour)  was,  as  we  have 
seen,  somewhat  despised,  and  relegated  to  the  mimes.  The 
trumpeters  appear  less  often  singly  than  in  twos  and  threes, 
and  it  is  possible  that  their  performances  may  have  been 
mainly  ceremonial  and  of  a  purely  instrumental  order.  But 
the  use  of  music  otherwise  than  to  accompany  the  voice  does 
not  seem  to  have  gone,  before  the  end  of  the  thirteenth  century, 
much  beyond  the  signals,  flourishes  and  fanfares  required  for 
wars,  triumphs  and  processions.  Concerted  instrumental 
music  was  a  later  development 1.  The  ordinary  functic^n  of 
the  harp  or  vielle  in  minstrelsy  was  to  assist  the  voice  of  the 
minstrel  in  one  of  the  many  forms  of  poetry  which  the  middle 
ages  knew.  These  were  both  lyric  and  narrative.  The  distinc- 
tion is  roughly  parallel  to  that  made  by  Thomas  de  Cabham 
when  he  subdivides  his  highest  grades  of  minstrels  into  those 
who  sing  wanton  songs  at  taverns,  and  those  more  properly 
called  ioculatores  who  solace  the  hearts  of  men  with  reciting 
the  deeds  of  the  heroes  and  the  lives  of  the  saints.  The 
themes  of  mediaeval  lyric,  as  of  all  lyric,  are  largely  wanton- 
ness and  wine  ;  but  it  must  be  borne  in  mind  that  Thomas  de 
Cabham's  classification  is  primarily  an  ethical  one,  and  does 
not  necessarily  imply  any  marked  difference  of  professional 
status  between  the  two  classes.  The  haunters  of  taverns  and 
the  solacers  of  the  virtuous  were  after  all  the  same  minstrels, 
or  at  least  minstrels  of  the  same  order.  That  the  chansons, 
in  their  innumerable  varieties,  caught  up  from  folk-song,  or  / 
devised  by  Provencal  ingenuity,  were  largely  in  the  mouths 
of  the  minstrels,  may  be  taken  for  granted.      It  was  here, 

1  Gautier,    ii.    69  ;    Lavoix,   La  Musiquc  au  Sihle  de  Saint-Louis, 
i.  315;  cf.  Appendix  C. 


74,  MINSTRELSY 

however,  that  the  competition  of  trobaire  and  trouvere  began 
earliest,  and  proved  most  triumphant,  and  the  supreme  minstrel 
genre  was  undoubtedly  the  narrative.  This  was,  in  a  sense, 
their  creation,  and  in  it  they  held  their  own,  until  the  laity 
learned  to  read  and  the  trouveres  became  able  to  eke  out  the 
shortness  of  their  memories  by  writing  down  or  printing  their 
stories.  With  narrative,  no  doubt,  the  minstrels  of  highest 
repute  mainly  occupied  themselves.  Harp  or  vielle  in  hand 
they  beguiled  many  a  long  hour  for  knight  and  chatelaine  with 
the  interminable  chansons  de  gestes  in  honour  of  Charlemagne 
and  his  heroic  band  \  or,  when  the  vogue  of  these  waned,  as  in 
time  it  did,  with  the  less  primitive  romans  daventure,  of  which 
those  that  clustered  round  the  Keltic  Arthur  were  the  widest 
famed.  Even  so  their  repertory  was  not  exhausted.  They  had 
lais,  dits  and  contes  of  every  kind ;  the  devout  contes  that 
Thomas  de  Cabham  loved,  historical  contes,  romantic  contes 
of  less  alarming  proportions  than  the  genuine  romans.  And 
for  the  bourgeoisie  they  had  those  improper,  witty  fabliaux,  so 
racy  of  the  French  soil,  in  which  the  esprit gaulois,  as  we  know 
it,  found  its  first  and  not  its  least  characteristic  expression. 
In  most  of  these  types  the  music  of  the  instrument  bore  its 
part.  The  shorter  lais  were  often  accompanied  musically 
throughout 2.  The  longer  poems  were  delivered  in  a  chant  or 
recitative,  the  monotony  of  which  was  broken  at  intervals  by 
a  phrase  or  two  of  intercalated  melody,  while  during  the  rest 
of  the  performance  a  few  perfunctory  notes  served  to  sustain 
the  voice 3.  And  at  times,  especially  in  the  later  days  of 
minstrelsy,  the  harp  or  vielle  was  laid  aside  altogether,  and  the 
singer  became  a  mere  story-teller.  The  antithesis,  no  infrequent 
one,  between  minstrel,  and  fabulator,  narrator,  fableor,conteor, 

1  W.  Mapes,  de  Nugis  Curia-  (B.N.  f.  fr.  2168)  of  Aucassin  et 
Hum  (Camden  Soc),  dist.  v.  prol.,  Nicolete  preserves  the  musical 
'  Caesar  Lucani,  Aeneas  Maronis,  notation  of  the  verse  sections.  Only 
multis  vivunt  in  laudibus,  plurimum  three  musical  phrases,  with  very 
suis  meritis  et  non  minimum  vigi-  slight  variations,  are  used.  Two  of 
lantia  poetarum  ;  nobis  divinam  these  were  probably  repeated,  alter- 
Karolorum  et  Pepinorum  nobilita-  nately  or  at  the  singer's  fancy, 
tern  vulgaribus  rithmis  sola  mimo-  throughout  the  tirade ;  the  third 
rum  concelebrat  nugacitas.'  provided  a  cadence  for  the  clos- 

2  Lavoix,  ii.  295.  ing   line  (Bourdillon,   Aucassin  et 

3  Ibid.  ii.  344.    The  Paris  MS.  Nicolette  (1897),  157). 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       75 

gestour,  disour,  segger,  though  all  these  are  themselves  else- 
where classed  as  minstrels,  sufficiently  suggests  this  \  It  was 
principally,  one  may  surmise,  the  dits  and  fabliaux  that  lent 
themselves  to  unmusical  narration  ;  and  when  prose  crept  in, 
as  in  time  it  did,  even  before  reading  became  universal,  it  can 
hardly  have  been  sung.  An  interesting  example  is  afforded 
by  Aucassin  et  Nicole te,  which  is  what  is  known  as  a  cante- 
fable.  That  is  to  say,  it  is  written  in  alternate  sections  of 
verse  and  prose.  The  former  have,  in  the  Paris  manuscript, 
a  musical  accompaniment,  and  are  introduced  with  the  words 
'  Or  se  cante ' ;  the  latter  have  no  music,  and  the  introduction 
'  Or  content  et  dient  etfablent! 

A  further  differentiation  amongst  minstrels  was  of  linguistic 
origin.  This  was  especially  apparent  in  England.  The  mime 
is  essentially  cosmopolitan.  In  whatever  land  he  finds  him- 
self the  few  sentences  of  patter  needful  to  introduce  his  tour 
or  his  nigremance  are  readily  picked  up.  It  is  not  so  with 
any  entertainer  whose  performances  claim  to  rank,  however 
humbly,  as  literature.  And  the  Conquest  in  England  brought 
into  existence  a  class  of  minstrels  who,  though  they  were  by 
no  means  mimes,  were  yet  obliged  to  compete  with  mimes, 
making  their  appeal  solely  to  the  bourgeoisie  and  the  peasants, 
because  their  speech  was  not  that  of  the  Anglo-Norman  lords 
and  ladies  who  formed  the  more  profitable  audiences  of  the 
castles.  The  native  English  gleemen  were  eclipsed  at  courts 
by  the  Taillefers  and  Raheres  of  the  invading  host.  But  they 
still  held  the  road  side  by  side  with  their  rivals,  shorn  of  their 
dignities,  and  winning  a  precarious  livelihood  from  the  shrunken 

1  Chaucer,  House  of  Fame,  1 1 97:  (Opera,  v.  col.  958)  'Apud  Anglos 
'  Of  alle  maner  of  minstrales,  est  simile  genus  hominum,  quales 
And  gestiours,  that  tellen  tales,  apud    Italos   sunt   circulatores,  de 
Bothe  of  weping  and  of  game.'  quibus  modo  dictum  est;  qui  irrum- 
Cf.  Sir  Thopas,  134;  and  Gower,  punt  in  convivia  magnatum,  aut  in 
Con/essio  Amantis,  vii.  2424  :  cauponas  vinarias  ;  et  argumentum 
'  And  every  menstral  hadde  pleid,  aliquod,  quod  cdidicerunt,  recitant ; 
And  every  disour  hadde  seid.'  puta    mortem    omnibus   dominari, 
The  evidence  of  Erasmus  is  late,  of  aut  laudem  matrimonii.     Sed  quo- 
course,   for  the   hey-day    of    min-  niam  ea  lingua   monosyllabis  fere 
strelsy,  but  in  his  time  there  were  constat,quemadmodumGermanica; 
certainly    English    minstrels    who  atque    illi    studio    vitant    cantum, 
merely     recited,    without     musical  nobis  latrare  videntur  verius  quam 
accompaniment ;     cf.     Ecclesiasles  loqui.' 


76  MINSTRELSY 

purses  of  those  of  their  own  blood  and  tongue 1.  It  was  they 
who  sang  the  unavailing  heroisms  of  Hereward,  and,  if  we 
may  judge  by  the  scanty  fragments  and  records  that  have 
come  down  to  us,  they  remained  for  long  the  natural  focus  and 
mouthpiece  of  popular  discontent  and  anti-court  sentiment. 
In  the  reign  of  Edward  III  a  gleeman  of  this  type,  Laurence 
Minot,  comes  to  the  front,  voicing  the  spirit  of  an  England 
united  in  its  nationalism  by  the  war  against  France  ;  the  rest 
are,  for  the  most  part,  nameless2.  Naturally  the  English 
gleemen  did  not  remain  for  ever  a  proscribed  and  isolated 
folk.  One  may  suspect  that  at  the  outset  many  of  them 
became  bilingual.  At  any  rate  they  learnt  to  mingle  with 
their  Anglo-Norman  confreres  :  they  borrowed  the  themes  of 
continental  minstrelsy;  translating  roman,  fabliau  and  chanson 
into  the  metres  and  dialects  of  the  vernacular  ;  and  had  their 
share  in  that  gradual  fusion  of  the  racial  elements  of  the  land, 
whose  completion  was  the  preparation  for  Chaucer. 

Besides  the  Saxons,  there  were  the  Kelts.  In  the  provinces 
of  France  that  bordered  on  Armorica,  in  the  English  counties 
that  marched  with  Wales,  the  Keltic  harper  is  no  unusual  or 
negligible  figure.  Whether  such  minstrels  ranked  very  high 
in  the  bardic  hierarchy  of  their  own  peoples  may  be  doubted  ; 
but  amid  alien  folk  they  achieved  popularity3.    Both  Giraldus 

1  Ten  Brink,  i.  193,  225,  235,  isolated  corner  of  Europe,  little 
314,  322  ;  Jusserand,  i.  219.  The  touched  by  Latin  influences,  the 
Old  gleeman  tradition  was  prob-  bards  long  retained  the  social  and 
ably  less  interfered  with  in  the  national  position  which  it  is  pro- 
lowlands  of  Scotland  than  in  Eng-  bable  they  once  had  held  in  all  the 
land  proper;  cf.  Henderson,  Scot-  Aryan  peoples.  Their  status  is 
tish  Vernacular  Literature ,  16.  defined  in  the  laws  of  Howel  Dha 

2  Ten  Brink,  i.  322  ;  Jusserand,  (t92o)  and  in  those  of  Gruffyd  ab 
i.  360  ;  Courthope,  i.  197.  Minot's  Cynan  (1100).  The  latter  code 
poems  have  been  edited  by  J.  Hall  distinguishes  three  orders  of  bards 
(Oxford,  1887).  See  also  Wright,  proper,  the  Pryddyd or  Chair  bards, 
Political  Songs  (C.S.)  and  Political  the  Teuluwr  or  Palace  bards,  and 
Poems  and  Songs  (R.S.).  Many  of  the  Arzvyddfardd  or  heralds,  also 
these,  however,  are  Latin.  called  Storiwwr,  the   cantores  hi- 

3  On  Welsh  bardism  see  H.  storici  of  Giraldus  Cambrensis.  The 
d'Arbois  de  Jubainville,  Jntr.  d  Pryddyd  and  Teuluwr  differ  pre- 
V Etude  de  la  Litt.  celtique,  63 ;  cisely  as  poets  and  executants, 
Stephens,  Literature  of  the  Kymry,  trouveres  and  jongleurs.  Below 
8,4>  93>  97;  io2  ;  Ernest  David,  all  these  come  the  Clerwr,  against 
Etudes  historiques  sur  la  Poe'sie  et  whom  official  bardism  from  the 
la  Musique  dans  la  Cambrie,  13,  sixth  to  the  thirteenth  century 
62-103,    147-64.      In    Wales,    an  showed    an    inveterate   animosity. 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       77 

Cambrensis  and  Thomas  the  author  of  Tristan  speak  of  a 
certain  famosus  fabulator  of  this  class,  Bledhericus  or  Breri 
by  name1.  Through  Breri  and  his  like  the  Keltic  traditions 
filtered  into  Romance  literature,  and  an  important  body  of 
scholars  are  prepared  to  find  in  lais  sung  to  a  Welsh  or  Breton 
harp  the  origincs  of  Arthurian  romance2.  In  England  the 
Welsh,  like  the  English-speaking  minstrels,  had  a  political,  as 
well  as  a  literary  significance.  They  were  the  means  by  which 
the  spirit  of  Welsh  disaffection  under  English  rule  was  kept 
alive,  and  at  times  fanned  into  a  blaze.  The  fable  of  the 
massacre  of  the  bards  by  Edward  I  is  now  discredited,  but  an 
ordinance  of  his  against  Keltic  'bards  and  rhymers'  is  upon 
record,  and  was  subsequently  repeated  under  Henry  IV3. 

An  important  question  now  presents  itself.  How  far,  in 
this  heterogeneous  welter  of  mediaeval  minstrelsy,  is  it  possible 
to  distinguish  any  elements  which  can  properly  be  called 
dramatic  ?  The  minstrels  were  entertainers  in  many  genres. 
Were  they  also  actors?  An  answer  may  be  sought  first  of 
all  in  their  literary  remains.  The  first  condition  of  drama  is 
dialogue,  and  dialogue  is  found  both  in  lyric  and  in  narrative 
minstrelsy.  Naturally,  it  is  scantiest  in  lyric.  But  there  is 
a  group  of  chansons  common  to  northern  France  and  to 
southern  France  or  Provence,  which  at  least  tended  to 
develop  in  this  direction.  There  are  the  chansons  a  danscr, 
which  are  frequently  a  semi-dialogue  between  a  soloist  and 
a  chorus,  the  one  singing  the  verses,  the  other  breaking  into 

These  are  an  unattached  wandering  Tristan  (t  1 170,  ed.  Michel,  ii.  847) : 

folk,  players  on  flutes,  tambourines,  '  Mes  sulum  50  que  j'ai  oy 

and  other  instruments  meaner  than  N'el  dient  pas  sulum  Breri, 

the  tclyn  or  harp,  and  the  crwth  or  Ky  solt  les  gestes  e  les  cuntes 

viol  which  alone  the  bards  proper  De  tuz  les  reis,  de  tuz  les  cuntes 

deigned  to  use.    Many  of  them  had  Ki  orent  este  en  Bretaingne.' 

also  picked  up  the  mime-tricks  of  2  G.  Paris,  in  Hist.  Litt.  xxx.  1- 

the    foreigners.      It   was    probably  22  ;     Litt.    Fr.     §§     53-5  ;     Nutt, 

with  these  Clerwr  that  the  English  Legend  of  the   Holy   Grail,   228  ; 

and  French  neighbours  of  the  Kelts  Rhys,  Arthurian  Legend,   370-90. 

came  mainly  into  contact.     Padel-  These  views  have  been  vigorously 

ford,  5,  puts  this  contact  as  early  as  criticized  by  Prof.  Zimmer  in  Gbt- 

the  Anglo-Saxon  period.  tingische  gelehrte  Anzeigen  (1891), 

1  Giraldus Cambrensis, Desc7ifilio  488,  7S5,  and  elsewhere. 

Cambriae,  i.  17  'famosus  ille  fabu-  s  David,   op.   cit.    13,  235  ;    cf. 

lator     Bledhericus,     qui     tempora  p.  54. 
nostra  paulo  praevenit.'     Thomas, 


78  MINSTRELSY 

a  burden  or  refrain.  There  are  the  chansons  a  personnages  or 
chansons  de  mal  marie'e,  complaints  of  unhappy  wives,  which 
often  take  the  form  of  a  dialogue  between  the  woman  and  her 
husband,  her  friend  or,  it  may  be,  the  poet,  occasionally  that 
of  a  discussion  on  courtly  love  in  general.  There  are  the 
atibes,  of  which  the  type  is  the  morning  dialogue  between 
woman  and  lover  adapted  by  Shakespeare  with  such  splendid 
effect  in  the  third  act  of  Romeo  ajid  Juliet.  And  finally 
there  are  the  pastourelles,  which  are  generally  dialogues 
between  a  knight  and  a  shepherdess,  in  which  the  knight 
makes  love  and,  successful  or  repulsed,  rides  away.  All  these 
chansons,  like  the  chansons  d'histoire  or  de  toile,  which  did  not 
develop  into  dialogues,  are,  in  the  form  in  which  we  have 
them,  of  minstrel  origin.  But  behind  them  are  probably  folk- 
songs of  similar  character,  and  M.  Gaston  Paris  is  perhaps 
right  in  tracing  them  to  the  fetes  du  mai,  those  agricultural 
festivals  of  immemorial  antiquity  in  which  women  traditionally 
took  so  large  a  part.  A  further  word  will  have  to  be  said  of 
their  ultimate  contribution  to  drama  in  a  future  chapter  \ 

Other  lyrical  dialogues  of  very  different  type  found  their 
way  into  the  literature  of  northern  France  from  that  of  Pro- 
vence. These  were  the  elaborate  disputes  about  abstract 
questions,  generally  of  love,  so  dear  to  the  artistic  and  scholas- 
tic mind  of  the  trobaire.  There  was  the  tenso  (Fr.  tencon)  in 
which  two  speakers  freely  discussed  a  given  subject,  each 
taking  the  point  of  view  which  seems  good  to  him.  And 
there  was  the  joc-partitz  or  par  timen  (Fr.jeu-parti  or  par ture), 
in  which  the  challenger  proposed  a  theme,  indicated  two 
opposed  attitudes  towards  it,  and  gave  his  opponent  his  choice 
to  maintain  one  or  other2.  Origi'nally,  no  doubt  the  tensons 
and  the  jocs-partitz  were,  as  they  professed  to  be,  improvised 
verbal  tournaments  :  afterwards  they  became  little  more  than 
academic  exercises3.    To  the  drama  they  have  nothing  to  say. 

1  Paris,  §§    118,  122,  and    Orig.  2  Paris,  §  126;   Orig.  (passim); 

(Passim) ;  Jeanroy,  1,  84,  102,  387  ;  Jeanroy,  45,  and  in  Lang,  et  Litt. 

Lang,  et  Litt.  i.  345  ;    cf.  ch.  viii.  i.    384  ;     Bartsch,    Grundriss    der 

Texts   of  chansons  d  personnages  prov.  Lit.  34 ;  Hueffer,  The  Trou- 

and  pastourelles  in  Bartsch,  Alt-  badours,  112;  Stimming  in  Grober's 

franzosische  Romanzen  und  Pas-  Grundriss,  ii.  2.  24. 

tourellen\    of    aubes    in    Bartsch,  3  In  1386  we  hear  of '  des  com- 

Chrestomathie  de  Fancien  francais.  paingnons,  pour  de  jeux  de  parture 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       79 

The  dialogue  elements  in  lyric  minstrelsy  thus  exhausted, 
we  turn  to  the  wider  field  of  narrative.  But  over  the  greater 
space  of  this  field  we  look  in  vain.  If  there  is  anything  of 
dialogue  in  the  chansons  de  gestes  and  the  romans  it  is  merely 
reported  dialogue  such  as  every  form  of  narrative  poetry  con- 
tains, and  is  not  to  the  purpose.  It  is  not  until  we  come  to 
the  humbler  branches  of  narrative,  the  unimportant  contes  and 
dits,  that  we  find  ourselves  in  the  presence  of  dialogue  proper. 
Dits  and  fabliaux  dialogue's  are  not  rare  \  There  is  the  already 
quoted  Deus  Bordeors  Ribauz  in  which  two  jougleurs  meet 
and  vaunt  in  turn  their  rival  proficiencies  in  the  various 
branches  of  their  common  art 2.  There  is  Rutebeuf's  Chariot 
et  le  Barbier,  a  similar  '  fiyting '  between  two  gentlemen  of  the 
road  3.  There  is  Courtois  a* Arras,  a  version  of  the  Prodigal 
Son  story 4.  There  is  Le  Rot  dAngleterre  et  le  Jongleur 
d'Ely,  a  specimen  of  witty  minstrel  repartee,  of  which  more 
will  be  said  immediately.  These  dialogues  naturally  tend  to 
become  of  the  nature  of  disputes,  and  they  merge  into  that 
special  kind  of  dit,  the  dibat  or  disputoison  proper.  The  dibat 
is  a  kind  of  poetical  controversy  put  into  the  mouths  of  two 
types  or  two  personified  abstractions,  each  of  which  pleads 
the  cause  of  its  own  superiority,  while  in  the  end  the  decision 
is  not  infrequently  referred  to  an  umpire  in  the  fashion  familiar 
in  the  eclogues  of  Theocritus  6.    The  dSats  thus  bear  a  strong 

juer  et  esbattre '  at  Douai  (Julie-  '  Rutebeuf  (ed.  Kressner),  99. 

ville,  Rip.  Com.  323),  which  looks  4  Barbazan-Me"on,i.  356.   Bddier, 

as  if,  by  the  end  of  the  fourteenth  33,  considers  Courtois  d' Arras  as 

century,  the  partures  were   being  the  oldest  French    comedy,  a  jeu 

professionally  performed.  dramatique  with  intercalated  narra- 

1  Paris,  §  109  ;    Be"dier,  31.      A  tive  by  a  meneur  de  jeu.    But  the 

fabliau  is  properly  a  '  conte  a  rire  fact  that  it  ends  with  the  words  Te 

en  vers ' ;  the  term  dit  is  applied  Deum  leads  one  to  look  upon  it  as 

more    generally   to  a    number    of  an  adaptation  of  a  religious  play  ; 

short  poems  which  deal,  '  souvent  cf.  ch.  xix. 

avecagre"ment,dessujetsemprunt6s  6  On  the  dibats  in  general,  see 

a  la  vie  quotidienne.'     Some  dits  Hist.  Litt.  xxiii.  216  sqq. ;    Paris, 

are   satirical,   others    eulogistic    of  Litt.fr.  §§  no,  155  ;  Arthur  Piaget, 

a  class  or  profession,  others  descrip-  Littirature    didactique     in    Lang. 

tive.    But  the  distinction  is  not  very  et  Litt.  ii.  208  ;    Jeanroy,  48  ;    R. 

well  defined,  and  the  fabliaux  are  Hirzel,  Der  Dialog,  ii.  382  ;  Litera- 

often  called  dits  in  the  MSS.  turblatt  (1887),  76.     A  full  list  is 

a  Montaiglon-Raynaud,  i.  I  ;  ii.  given  by  Petit,    Rip.  Com.  405-9. 

257.      The   dit  is   also   called   La  The  dibats  merge  into    such  alle- 

fengle  au  Ribaut  el  laContrejengle.  gorical  poems  as  Henri  d'Andeli's 


80 


MINSTRELSY 


resemblance  to  the  lyric  tencons  and  jeux-partis  already  men- 
tioned. Like  the  chansons,  they  probably  owe  something  to 
the  folk  festivals  with  their  '  flytings  '  and  seasonal  songs.  In 
any  case  they  are  common  ground  to  minstrelsy  and  to  the 
clerkly  literature  of  the  Middle  Ages.  Many  of  the  most  famous 
of  them,  such  as  the  Debat  dc  I  Hivcr  et  dc  F Etc,  the  Dcbat 
du  Vin  et  dc  FEau,  the  Dcbat  du  Corps  ct  dc  FAme,  exist  in 
neo-Latin  forms,  the  intermediaries  being  naturally  enough 
those  vagantcs  or  wandering  scholars,  to  whom  so  much  of  the 
interaction  of  learned  and  of  popular  literature  must  be  due l. 
And  in  their  turn  many  of  the  debats  were  translated  sooner  or 
later  into  English.  English  literature,  indeed,  had  had  from 
Anglo-Saxon  days  a  natural  affinity  for  the  dialogue  form  2, 


Bataille  des  Vins  (Barbazon-Meon, 
i.  152)  or  Le  Mariage  des  Sept  A  rts 
et  des  Sept  Vert  us  (Jubinal,  CEuvres 
de  Rutcbeuf  ii.  415);  cf.  Paris, 
Lift.  fr.  158. 

1  Ten  Brink,  i.  215;  Hubatsch, 
24 ;  Gummere,  B.  P.  200,  306.  The 
Debat  de  f  Yver  ct  de  V Este  has  the 
nearest  folk-lore  origin ;  cf.  ch.  ix. 
Paris,  Origines,  28,  mentions  several 
Greek  and  Latin  versions  beginning 
with  Aesop  (Halm,  414).  The  most 
important  is  the  ninth-century  Con- 
flict us  Verts  et  Hiemis  (Riese, 
Anth.  Lat.  i.  2.  145),  variously 
ascribed  to  Bede  ( Wernsdorff, 
Poetae  Latini  Minores,  ii.  239), 
Alcuin  (Ate.  Opera,  ed.  Froben,  ii. 
612)  and  others.  French  versions 
are  printed  in  Montaiglon- Roth- 
schild, Anc.  Poes.fr.  vi.  190,  x. 
41,  and  Jubinal,  N.  R.  ii.  40.  There 
are  imitations  in  all  tongues :  cf. 
M.  Emile  Picot's  note  in  Mont.- 
Rothsch.  op.  cit.  x.  49 ;  Hist.  Litt. 
xxiii.  231  ;  Douhet,  1441. — La  Dis- 
putoison  du  Vin  et  de  V Iaue  is 
printed  in  Jubinal,  N.  R.  i.  293  ; 
Wright,  Lat.  Poems  of  Walter 
Mapes,  299  ;  Carmina  Burana,  232. 
It  is  based  on  the  Goliae  Dialogus 
inter  Aquam  ct  Vinum  (Wright, 
loc.  cit.  87)  ;  cf.  Hist.  Litt.  xxiii. 
228  ;  Romania,  xvi.  366. — On  the 
complicated  history  of  the  Dcbat  du 
Corps  et  de  I'Ame,  see  T.  Batiouch- 
kof   in    Romania,  xx.    1.    513;    G. 


Kleinert,  Ueber  den  Streit  von  Leib 
und  Seele;  Hist.  Litt.  xxii.  162; 
P.  de  Julleville,  Repertoire  Comique, 
5,  300,  347  ;  Wright,  .Latin  Poetns, 
xxiii.  95,  321.  Latin,  French  and 
other  versions  are  given  by  Wright, 
and  by  Viollet-Leduc,  Anc.  The.fr. 
iii.  325. — Phil  lis  et  Flora,  or  De 
Phyllis  qui  aime  tin  chevalier  et  de 
Flora  qui  aune  un  prctre,  is  also 
referred  by  Paris,  Orig.  28,  to  a  folk- 
song beginning  ;  cf.  //.  L.  xxii.  138, 
165  ;  Romania,  xxii.  536.  Latin 
versions  are  in  Carmina  Burana, 
155;  WTright,  Latin  Poems  of  W. 
Mapes,  258.— A  possible  influence 
of  the  Theocritean  and  Virgilian 
eclogues  upon  these  debats,  through 
their  neo-Latin  forms,  must  be  borne 
in  mind. 

2  Wiilker,  384;  Brooke,  i.  139,  ii. 
93,  221,  268  ;  Jussenmd,  i.  75,  443. 
The  passages  of  dialogue  dwelt  on 
by  these  writers  mostly  belong  to  the 
work  of  Cynewulf  and  his  school. 
It  has  been  suggested  that  some  of 
them,  e.g.  the  A.-S.  Descent  into 
Hell  (Grein,  iii.  1 75  ;  cf.  Anglia,  xix. 
137),  or  the  dialogue  between  Mary 
and  Joseph  in  Cynewulf's  Christ, 
163  (ed.  Gollancz,  p.  16),  may  have 
been  intended  for  liturgical  use  by 
half-choirs ;  but  of  this  there  is 
really  no  proof.  Wiilker,  loc.  cit., 
shows  clearly  that  the  notion  of  a 
dramatic  representation  was  unfa- 
miliar to  the  Anglo-Saxons. 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       81 

and  presents  side  by  side  with  the  translated  de'bats  others — 
strifs  or  estrifs  is  the  English  term — of  native  origin  x.  The 
thirteenth-century  Harrowing  of  Hell  is  an  estrif 'on  a  subject 
familiar  in  the  miracle  plays :  and  for  an  early  miracle  play  it 
has  sometimes  been  mistaken  2.  Two  or  three  other  estrifs 
of  English  origin  are  remarkable,  because  the  interlocutors 
are  not  exactly  abstractions,  but  species  of  birds  and 
animals  3. 

Dialogue  then,  in  one  shape  or  another,  was  part  of  the 
minstrel's  regular  stock-in-trade.  But  dialogue  by  itself  is  not 
drama.  The  notion  of  drama  does  not,  perhaps,  necessarily 
imply  scenery  on  a  regular  stage,  but  it  does  imply  impersona- 
tion and  a  distribution  of  roles  between  at  least  two  performers. 
Is  there  anything  to  be  traced  in  minstrelsy  that  satisfies  these, 
conditions  ?  So  far  as  impersonation  is  concerned,  there  are 
several  scattered  notices  which  seem  to  show  that  it  was  not 
altogether  unknown.  In  the  twelfth  century  for  instance, 
iElred,  abbot  of  Rievaulx,  commenting  on  certain  unpleasing 
innovations  in  the  church  services  of  the  day,  complains  that 
the  singers  use  gestures  just  like  those  of  histriones,  fit  rather 
for  a  Iheatrum  than  for  a  house  of  prayer  4.    The  word  theatrum 

1  Ten  Brink,  i.  312.  Several  ritatis,  ii.  23  (P.  L.  cxcv.  571)  '  Vi- 
English  versions  of  the  Debate  be-  deas  aliquando  hominem  aperto  ore 
tween  Body^and  Soul  are  given  by  quasi  intercluso  halitu  expirare, 
Wright,  loc.  at.  334.  An  English  non  cantare,  ac  ridiculosa  quadam 
Debate  and  Stryfe  betwene  Somer  vocis  interceptione  quasi  minitari 
and  Wynter  is  in  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  silentium  ;  nunc  agones  morientium, 
Early  Popular  Poetry,  iii.  29.  vel  extasim  patientium  imitari.  Inte- 

2  Cf.  ch.  xx.  rim  histrionicis  quibusdara  gestibus 
8  Ten  Brink,    i.  214,  309.      The     totum   corpus   agitatur,   torquentur 

Owl  and  the  Nightingale  (c.  1 216-  labia,  rotant,  ludunt  humeri ;  et  ad 

72),  was  printed  by  J.   Stevenson  singulas  quasque  notas   digitorum 

(Roxburghe  Club)  ;  the  Thrush  and  flexus  respondet.     Et   haec  ridicu- 

the  Nightingale  and  the  Fox  and  losa  dissolutio  vocatur  religio !  .  .  . 

the  Wolf,  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt,  Early  Vulgus  .  .  .  miratur  .  .  .  sed  lasci- 

Popular  Poetry,   i.  50,  58.     There  vas  cantantium  gesticulationes,  me- 

are  also  a  Debate  of  the  Carpenter's  retricias    vocum     alternationes    et 

Tools  (Hazlitt,  i.  79)  and  an  English  infractiones,  non  sine  cachinno  risu- 

version  of  a  Latin  Dtsputacio  inter  que  intuetur,  ut  eos  non  ad  orato- 

Mariam    et     Crucem   (R.    Morris,  rium  sed  ad  theatrum,  non  ad  oran- 

Legends  of  the  Holy   Rood,   131);  dum,  sed  ad  spectandum  aestimes 

cf.  Ten  Brink,  i.  259,  312.  An  A.-S.  convenisse.'    Cf.op.cit.ii.  17  '  Cum 

version  of  the  Debate  between  Body  enim  in  tragediis  vanisve  carminibus 

and    Soul  is  in   the  Exeter  Book  quisquam    iniuriatus    ringitur,    vel 

(Grein,  ii.  92).  oppressus  .  .  .  si  quis  haec,  vel  cum 

4.iElred(tn66),  Speculum  Cha-  canuntur    audiens,  vel    cernens   si 

CHAMBERS.     I  G 


82 


MINSTRELSY 


is,  however,  a  little  suspicious,  for  an  actual  theatre  in  the 
twelfth  century  is  hardly  thinkable,  and  with  a  learned  eccle- 
siastic one  can  never  be  sure  that  he  is  not  drawing  his 
illustrations  rather  from  his  knowledge  of  classical  literature 
than  from  the  real  life  around  him.  It  is  more  conclusive, 
perhaps,  when  fabliaux  or  contes  speak  of  minstrels  as  '  doing ' 
fivre,  or  le  cat,  or  le  sot x ;  or  when  it  appears  from  con- 
temporary accounts  that  at  a  performance  in  Savoy  the 
manners  of  England  and  Brittany  were  mimicked  2.  In  Pro- 
vence ccmtrafazedor  seems  to  have  been  a  regular  name  for 
a  minstrel 3  ;  and  the  facts  that  the  minstrels  wore  masks 
'  with  intent  to  deceive '  4,  and  were  forbidden  to  wear  eccle- 
siastical dresses  5,  also  point  to  something  in  the  way  of  rudi- 
mentary impersonation. 

As  for  the  distribution  of  r61es,  all  that  can  be  said,  so  far 
as  the  de'bats  and  dits  dialogue's  go,  is,  that  while  some  of  them 


recitentur  .  .  .  moveatur'  ;  and 
Johannes  de  Janua,  s.v.  persona 
(cited  Creizenach,  i.  381)  '  Item  per- 
sona dicitur  histrio,  repraesentator 
comoediarum,  qui  diversis  modis 
personat  diversas  repraesentando 
personas.'  All  these  passages,  like 
the  ninth-century  responsio  of  arch- 
bishop Leidradus  referred  to  on 
p.  36,  may  be  suspected  of  learning 
rather  than  actuality.  As  for  the 
epitaph  of  the  mime  Vitalis  (Riese, 
Anth.  Lat.  i.  2.  143 ;  Baehrens, 
P.  L.  M.  iii.  245),  sometimes  quoted 
in  this  connexion,  it  appears  to  be 
classical  and  not  mediaeval  at  all ; 
cf.  Teuffel-Schwabe,  §§  8.  11  ;  32.  6. 
Probably  this  is  also  the  case  with 
the  lines  De  Mitno  iam  Sene  in 
Wright,  Anecdota  Literaria,  100, 
where  again  '  theatra '  are  men- 
tioned. 

1  Cf.  p.  71.  The  mention  of  a 
'Disare  that  played  the  sheppart' 
at  the  English  court  in  1502  (Nico- 
las, Pi  ivy  Purse  Expenses  of  Eli- 
zabeth of  York)  is  too  late  to  be  of 
importance  here. 

*  Creizenach,  i.  383,  citing  at 
second-hand  from  fourteenth-cen- 
tury accounts  of  a  Savoy  treasurer 
4  rappresentando    i    costumi    delle 


compagnie  inglesi  e  bretoni.' 

3  Creizenach,  i.  380. 

*  Thomas  de  Cabham  mentions 
the  horribiles  larvae  of  some 
minstrels.  A.  Lecoy  de  la  Marche, 
La  Chaire  francaise  (ed.  2,  1886), 
444,  quotes  a  sermon  of  Etienne 
de  Bourbon  in  MS.  B.  N.  Lat. 
I597°>  f«  352  'a(l  similitudinem 
illorum  ioculatorum  qui  ferunt 
facies  depictas  quae  dicuntur  arti- 
ficia  gallice,  cum  quibus  ludunt  et 
homines  deludunt.'  Cf.  Liudprand, 
iii.  15  (Pertz,  iii.  310)  'histrionum 
mimorumve  more  incedere,  qui,  ut 
ad  risum  facile  turbas  illiciant, 
variis  sese  depingunt  coloribus.' 
The  monstra  larvarum,  however, 
of  various  ecclesiastical  prohibitions 
I  take  to  refer  specifically  to  the 
Feast  of  Fools  (cf.  ch.  xiii). 

5  Schack,  Gesch.  der  dram.  Litt. 
und  Kunst  in  Spanien,  i.  30,  quotes 
a  Carolingian  capitulary,  from  Hei- 
neccius,  Capit.  lib.  v.  c.  388  '  si  quis 
ex  scenicis  vestem  sacerdotalem  aut 
monasticam  vel  mulieris  religiosae 
vel  qualicunque  ecclesiastico  statu 
similem  indutus  fuerit,  corporali 
poena  subsistat  et  exilio  tradatur.' 
This  prohibition  is  as  old  as  the 
Codex  Theodosianus  ;  cf.  p.  14. 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY       83 

may  conceivably  have  been  represented  by  more  than  one- 
performer,  none  of  them  need  necessarily  have  been  so,  and 
some  of  them  certainly  were  not.  There  is  generally  a  narrative 
introduction  and  often  a  sprinkling  of  narrative  interspersed 
amongst  the  dialogue.  These  parts  may  have  been  pronounced 
by  an  auctor  or  by  one  of  the  interlocutors  acting  as  anctor. 
and  some  such  device  must  have  been  occasionally  necessitated 
in  the  religious  drama.  But  there  is  really  no  difficulty  in 
supposing  the  whole  of  these  pieces  to  have  been  recited  by 
a  single  minstrel  with  appropriate  changes  of  gesture  and 
intonation,  and  in  The  Harrowing  of  Hell,  which  begins  '  A 
strif  will  I  tellen  of,'  this  was  clearly  the  case.  The  evidences 
of  impersonation  given  above  are  of  course  quite  consistent 
with  such  an  arrangement  ;  or,  for  the  matter  of  that,  with 
sheer  monologue.  The  minstrel  who  recited  Rutebeuf's  Dit 
dc  I Erberie  may  readily  be  supposed  to  have  got  himself  up 
in  the  character  of  a  quack  1. 

But  the  possibilities  of  secular  mediaeval  drama  are  not 
quite  exhausted  by  the  debats  and  dits  dialogue's.  For  after 
all,  the  written  literature  which  the  minstrels  have  left  us 
belongs  almost  entirely  to  those  higher  strata  of  their  complex 
fraternity  which  derived  from  the  thoroughly  undramatic 
Teutonic  scop.  But  if  mediaeval  farce  there  were,  it  would 
not  be  here  that  we  should  look  for  it.  It  would  belong  to 
the  inheritance,  not  of  the  scop,  but  of  the  mimus.  The  Roman 
mimus  was  essentially  a  player  of  farces  ;  that  and  little  else. 
It  is  of  course  open  to  any  one  to  suppose  that  the  mimus 
went  down  in  the  seventh  century  playing  farces,  and  that  his 
like  appeared  in  the  fifteenth  century  playing  farces,  and  that 
not  a  farce  was  played  between.  But  is  it  not  more  probable 
on  the  whole  that,  while  occupying  himself  largely  with  other 
matters,  he  preserved  at  least  the  rudiments  of  the  art  of 
acting,  and  that  when  the  appointed  time  came,  the  despised 
and  forgotten  farce,  under  the  stimulus  of  new  conditions, 
blossomed  forth  once  more  as  a  vital  and  effective  form  of 
literature  ?  In  the  absence  of  data  we  are  reduced  to  con- 
jecture.    But  the  mere  absence  of  data  itself  does  not  render 

1  (Euvresde  Rutebeuf  (ed.  Kress-  Julleville,  Les  Com.  24;  Rtp.  Com. 
ner),   115;  cf.  Romania,  xvi.  496;      407. 

G  a 


84  MINSTRELSY 

the  conjecture  untenable.  For  if  such  rudimentary,  or,  if  you 
please,  degenerate  farces  as  I  have  in  mind,  ever  existed  in 
the  Middle  Ages,  the  chances  were  all  against  their  literary 
survival.  They  were  assuredly  very  brief,  very  crude,  often 
improvised,  and  rarely,  if  ever,  written  down.  They  belonged 
to  an  order  of  minstrels  far  below  that  which  made  literature1. 
And  one  little  bit  of  evidence  which  has  not  yet  been  brought 
forward  seems  to  point  to  the  existence  of  something  in  the 
way  of  a  secular  as  well  as  a  religious  mediaeval  drama.  In 
the  well-known  Wyclifite  sermon  against  miracle  plays,  an 
imaginary  opponent  of  the  preacher's  argument  is  made  to 
say  that  after  all  it  is  '  lesse  yvels  that  thei  have  thyre  recrea- 
ceon  by  pleyinge  of  myraclis  than  bi  pleyinge  of  other  japis'; 
and  again  that  '  to  pley  in  rebaudye  '  is  worse  than  '  to  pley 
in  myriclis  V  Now,  there  is  of  course  no  necessary  dramatic 
connotation  either  in  the  word  'pley'  or  in  the  word  'japis,' 
which,  like  '  bourde '  or  '  gab '  is  frequently  used  of  any  kind 
of  rowdy  merriment,  or  of  the  lower  types  of  minstrelsy  in 
general 3.  But  on  the  other  hand  the  whole  tone  of  the  passage 
seems  to  draw  a  very  close  parallel  between  the  'japis'  and 
the  undeniably  dramatic  '  myriclis,'  and  to  imply  something 
in  the  former  a  little  beyond  the  mere  recitation,  even  with 
the  help  of  impersonation,  of  a  solitary  mime. 

Such  rude  farces  or  'japis'  as  we  are  considering,  if  they 

1  Creizenach,  i.  386,  further  points  term  in  a  more  technical  sense, 
out  that  a  stage  was  not  indispens-  Activa  Vita  in  Piers  Plowman,  xvi. 
able  to  the  Latin  mimus,  who  habi-  207,  is  no  minstrel,  because '  Ich  can 
tually  played  before  the  curtain  and  not  .  .  .  japen  ne  jogelen.'  No 
probably  with  very  little  setting;  doubt  a  'jape'  would  include  a 
that  the  favourite  situations  of  fabliau.  It  is  equivalent  etymo- 
fifteenth-century  French  farce  close-  logically  to  'gab,'  and  Bedier,  33, 
ly  resemble  those  of  the  mimes ;  points  out  that  the  jongleurs  use 
and  that  the  use  of  marionettes  gabet,  as  well  as  bourde,  trufe,  and 
is  a  proof  of  some  knowledge  of  rise'e  for  a  fabliau. — The  use  of 
dramatic  methods  amongst  the  '  pleye '  as  'jest'  may  be  illus- 
minstrels.  trated  by  Chaucer,  Pardoner's  Tale 

2  On  this  treatise,  cf.  ch.  xx.  (C.    T.   12712)    'My   wit   is   greet, 

3  A'japer'  is  often  an  idle  talker,  though  that  I  bourde  and  pleye.' — 
like  a  'jangler'  which  is  clearly  The  'japis  '  of  the  Tretise  are  pro- 
sometimes  confused  with  a  'jon-  bably  the  '  knakkes  '  of  the  passage 
gleur';  cf.  Chaucer,  Parson's  Tale,  on  'japeris'  in  Parson's  Tale,  651 
89  '  He  is  a  japere  and  a  gabber  '  right  so  conforten  the  vileyns 
and  no  verray  repentant  that  eft-  wordes  and  knakkes  of  japeris  hem 
soone  dooth  thing  for  which  hym  that  travaillen  in  the  service  of  the 
oghte  repente.'     Langland  uses  the  devel.' 


THE  MINSTREL  REPERTORY  85 

formed  part  of  the  travelling  equipment  of  the  humbler  mimes, 
could  only  get  into  literature  by  an  accident ;  in  the  event,  that 
is  to  say,  of  some  minstrel  of  a  higher  class  taking  it  into  his 
head  to  experiment  in  the  form  or  to  adapt  it  to  the  purposes 
of  his  own  art.  And  this  is  precisely  what  appears  to  have 
happened.  A  very  natural  use  of  the  farce  would  be  in  the 
parade  or  preliminary  patter,  merely  about  himself  and  his 
proficiency,  which  at  all  times  has  served  the  itinerant  enter- 
tainer as  a  means  whereby  to  attract  his  audiences.  And  just 
as  the  very  similar  boniment  or  patter  of  the  mountebank 
charlatan  at  a  fair  became  the  model  for  Rutebeuf's  Dit  de 
V  Erberie,  so  the  parade  may  be  traced  as  the  underlying  motive 
of  other  dits  ox  fabliaux.  The  Dens  Bordeors  Ribanz  is  itself 
little  other  than  a  glorified  parade,  and  another,  very  slightly 
disguised,  may  be  found  in  the  discomfiture  of  the  king  by 
the  characteristic  repartees  of  the  wandering  minstrel  in  Le 
Roi  dAngleterre  et  le  Jongleur  cfEly1.  The  parade,  also, 
seems  to  be  the  origin  of  a  certain  familiar  type  of  dramatic 
prologue  in  which  the  author  or  the  presenters  of  a  play 
appear  in  their  own  persons.  The  earliest  example  of  this  is 
perhaps  that  enigmatic  Terentius  et  Dclusor  piece  which  some 
have  thought  to  point  to  a  representation  of  Terence  some- 
where in  the  dark  ages  between  the  seventh  and  the  eleventh 
century  2.  And  there  is  a  later  one  in  the  Jen  du  Pelerin 
which  was  written  about  1288  to  precede  Adan  de  la  Hale's 
Jen  de  Robin  et  Marion. 

The  renascence  of  farce  in  the  fifteenth  century  will  call 
for  consideration  in  a  later  chapter.  It  is  possible  that,  as  is 
here  suggested,  that  renascence  was  but  the  coming  to  light 
again   of  an    earth-bourne   of  dramatic   tradition    that   had 

1  Montaiglon-Raynaud,    ii.   243.  with  which  the  jongleur  meets  the 

Ci.Hisi.Litt.yxm..  103;  Jusserand,  king's  questions.    Thus,  in  La  Riote 

Lit.  Hist.  i.  442.     A  shorter  prose  du  Monde  :  '  Dont  ies  tu?— Je  suis 

form  of  the  story  is  found  in  La  de  no  vile. — U  est  te  vile  ? — Entor 

Riote  du   Monde  (ed.  Fr.   Michel,  le  moustier. — U  est  li  moustiers  ? — 

1834),  a  popular  face'tie  of  which  En  l'atre. — U    est    li    atres  ?— Sor 

both    French   and    Anglo-Norman  terre.— U     siet    cele    terre?  — Sor 

versions  exist ;  cf.  Paris,   Litt.  fr.  l'iaue.— Comment    apiel-on  l'iaue  ? 

153.     And  a  Latin  form,  De  Mtmo  —On  ne  l'apiele   nient ;  ele  vient 

et  Rege  Francorum  is  in  Wright,  bien  sans  apieler.' 
Latin  Stories,  No.  1 37.     The  point  2  Cf.  Appendix  V. 

consists    in    the   quibbling   replies 


86  MINSTRELSY 

worked  its  way  beneath  the  ground  ever  since  the  theatres 
of  the  Empire  fell.  In  any  case,  rare  documents  of  earlier 
date  survive  to  show  that  it  was  at  least  no  absolutely  sudden 
and  unprecedented  thing.  The  jcux  of  Adan  de  la  Hale, 
indeed,  are  somewhat  irrelevant  here.  They  were  not  farces, 
and  will  fall  to  be  dealt  with  in  the  discussion  of  the  popular 
fetes  from  which  they  derive  their  origin1.  But  the  French 
farce  of  Lc  Gar  con  ct  FAveugle,  ascribed  to  the  second  half  of 
the  thirteenth  century,  is  over  a  hundred  years  older  than  any 
of  its  extant  successors 2.  And  even  more  interesting  to  us, 
because  it  is  of  English  provenance  and  in  the  English  tongue, 
is  a  fragment  found  in  an  early  fourteenth-century  manuscript 
of  a  dramatic  version  of  the  popular  mediaeval  tale  of  Dame 
Siriz ::.  This  bears  the  heading  Hie  incipit  intcrludium  de 
Clerico  ct  Puella.  But  the  significance  of  this  fateful  word 
intcrludium  must  be  left  for  study  at  a  later  period,  when  the 
history  of  the  secular  drama  is  resumed  from  the  point  at 
which  it  must  now  be  dropped. 

1  Cf.  ch.  viii.  for  the  earlier  non-dramatic  versions 

2  Ed.  P.  Meyer,  in  Jahrbuch  fiir  in  Latin,  French,  and  English  of 
romanische  und  englischc  Lit  era-  the  story  are  given  by  Jusserand, 
tur,  vi.  163.  The  piece  was  pro-  Lit.  Hist.  i.  447.  A  Cornish  dra- 
bably  written  in  Flanders,  between  matic  fragment  of  the  fourteenth 
1266  and  1290.  Cf.  Creizenach,  i.  century  is  printed  in  the  Athenceum 
390.  for  Dec.  i,  1877,  and  Revue  celtique, 

*  See  Appendix  U.     References      iv.  259  ;  cf.  Creizenach,  i.  401. 


BOOK  II 

FOLK     DRAMA 

Stultorum  infinitus  est  numerus. 

ECCLESIASTES. 


CHAPTER  V 
THE   RELIGION   OF  THE   FOLK 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  conversion  of  heathen  England  is  described 
in  the  Ecclesiastical  History  of  Bede  (C.  Plummer,  Baedae  Opera  Hislorica, 
1896).  Stress  is  laid  on  the  imperfect  character  of  the  process  by 
L.  Knappert,  Le  Christianisme  et  le  Paganisme  dans  I'Histoire  eccUsias- 
tique  de  Bede  le  Vendrable  (in  Revue  de  I 'Histoire  des  Religions,  1897, 
vol.  xxxv).  A  similar  study  for  Gaul  is  E.  Vacandard,  L'Idolatrie  dans 
la  Gaule  (in  Revite  des  Questions  historiques,  1899,  vol.  lxv).  Witness 
is  borne  to  the  continued  presence  of  pre-Christian  elements  in  the  folk- 
civilization  of  western  Europe  both  by  the  general  results  of  folk-lore 
research  and  by  the  ecclesiastical  documents  of  the  early  Middle  Ages. 
Of  these  the  most  important  in  this  respect  are — (1)  the  Decrees  of 
Councils,  collected  generally  in  P.  Labbe  and  G.  Cossart,  Sacrosancta 
Concilia  (1671-2),  and  J.  D.  Mansi,  Sacrorum  Conciliorum  nova  et 
amplissima  Collectio  (1759-98),  and  for  England  in  particular  in 
D.  Wilkins,  Concilia  Magnae  Britanniae  et  Hiberniae  (1737)  and  A.  W. 
Haddan  and  W.  Stubbs,  Councils  and  Ecclesiastical  Documents  relating 
to  Great  Britain  and  Ireland  (1869-78).  An  interesting  series  of 
extracts  is  given  by  G.  Grober,  Zur  Volkskunde  aus  Concilbeschliissen 
und  Capitularien  (1894)  : — (2)  the  Penitentials,  or  catalogues  of  sins  and 
their  penalties  drawn  up  for  the  guidance  of  confessors.  The  most 
important  English  example  is  the  Penitential  of  Theodore  (668-90), 
on  which  the  Penitentials  of  Bede  and  of  Egbert  are  based.  Authentic 
texts  are  given  by  Haddan  and  Stubbs,  vol.  iii,  and,  with  others  of  con- 
tinental origin,  in  F.  W.  H.  Wasserschleben,  Die  Bussordnungen  der 
abendlandischen  Kirche  (1851),  and  H.  J.  Schmitz,  Die  Bussbiicher  und 
die  Bussdisciplin  der  Kirche  (1883).  The  most  interesting  for  its  heathen 
survivals  is  the  eleventh-century  Collectio  Decretorum  of  Burchardus 
of  Worms  (Migne,  P.  L.  cxl,  extracts  in  J.  Grimm,  Teutonic  Mythology, 
iv.  1740): — (3)  Homilies  or  Sermons,  such  as  the  Sermo  ascribed  to  the 
seventh-century  St.  Eligius  (P.  L.  Ixxxvii.  524,  transl.  Grimm,  iv.  1737), 
and  the  eighth-century  Frankish  pseudo-Augustinian  Homilia  de  Sacri- 
legiis  (ed.  C.  P.  Caspari,  1886): — (4)  the  Vitae  of  the  apostles  of  the 
West,  St.  Boniface,  St.  Columban,  St.  Gall,  and  others.  A  critical  edition 
of  these  is  looked  for  from  M.  Knappert.  The  Epistolae  of  Boniface  are 
in  P.  L.  lxxxix.  593  : — (5)  Miscellaneous  Documents,  including  the  sixth- 
century  De  correctione  Rusticorum  of  Bishop  Martin  of  Braga  in  Spain 
(ed.  C.  P.  Caspari,  1883)  and  the  so-called  Indiculus  Superstitionum  et 
Paganiarum  (ed.  H.  A.  Saupe,  1891),  a  list  of  heathen  customs  probably 
drawn  up  in  eighth-century  Saxony. — The  view  of  primitive  religion  taken 
in  this  book  is  largely,  although  not  altogether  in  detail,  that  of  J.  G. 
Frazer,  The  Golden  Bough  (1890,  2nd  ed.  1900),  which  itself  owes  much 
to  E.  B.  Tylor,  Primitive  Culture  (1871);  W.  Robertson  Smith, 
Religion  of  the  Semites  (2nd  ed.  1894)  ;  W.  Mannhardt,  Der  Baumkultus 
der  Germanen  (1875) ;  Antike  Wald-  und  Feldkulte  (1875-7).     A  more 


90  FOLK  DRAMA 

systematic  work  on  similar  lines  is  F.  B.  Jevons,  An  Introduction  to  the 
History  of  Religion  (1896) :  and  amongst  many  others  may  be  mentioned 
A.  Lang,  Myth,  Ritual,  and  Religion  (1887,  2nd  ed.  1899),  the  conclusions 
of  which  are  somewhat  modified  in  the  same  writer's  The  Making  of 
Religion  (1898);  Grant  Allen,  The  Evolution  of  the  Idea  of  God  (1897) ; 
E.  S.  Hartland,  The  Legend  of  Perseus  (1894-6);  J.  Rhys,  The  Origin 
and  Growth  of  Religion  as  illustrated  by  Celtic  Heathendom  (1888). 
The  last  of  these  deals  especially  with  Keltic  data,  which  may  be  further 
studied  in  H.  D'Arbois  de  Jubainville,  Le  Cycle  mythologique  irlaudais 
el  la  Mythologie  celtique  (1884),  together  with  the  chapter  on  La  Religion 
in  the  same  writer's  La  Civilisation  des  Celtes  et  celle  de  V Efiofie'e 
homerique  (1899)  and  A.  Bertrand,  La  Religion  des  Gaulois  (1897). 
Teutonic  religion  has  been  more  completely  investigated.  Recent  works 
of  authority  are  E.  H.  Meyer,  Gertnanische  Mythologie  (1891)  ;  W.  Golther, 
Handbuch  dergermanischen  Mythologie  (1895 ) ;  and  the  article  by  E.  Mogk 
on  Mythologie  in  H.  Paul's  Grundriss  der  germanischen  Philologie,  vol.  iii 
(2nded.  1897).  Thecollection  of  material  inj.  Grimm's  Teutonic  Mythology 
(transl.  J.  S.  Stallybrass,  1880-8)  is  still  of  the  greatest  value.  The  general 
facts  of  early  German  civilization  are  given  by  F.  B.  Gummere,  Germanic 
Origins  (1892),  and  for  the  Aryan-speaking  peoples  in  general  by 
O.  Schrader,  Prehistoric  Antiquities  of  the  Aryan  Peoples  (transl.  F.  B. 
Jevons,  1890),  and  Reallexicon  der  indo-germanischen  Altertumskunde 
(1901).  In  dealing  with  the  primitive  calendar  I  have  mainly,  but  not  wholly, 
followed  the  valuable  researches  of  A.  Tilie,  Deutsche  Weihnacht  (1893) 
and  Yule  and  Christmas  (1899),  a  scholar  the  loss  of  whom  to  this  country 
is  one  of  the  lamentable  results  of  the  recent  war.] 

Minstrelsy  was  an  institution  of  the  folk,  no  less  than  of 
)  the  court  and  the  bourgeoisie.  At  many  a  village  festival,  one 
may  be  sure,  the  taberers  and  buffoons  played  their  conspicuous 
part,  ravishing  the  souls  of  Dorcas  and  Mopsa  with  merry  and 
doleful  ballads, and  tumbling  through  their  amazing  programme 
of  monkey  tricks  before  the  ring  of  wide-mouthed  rustics  on 
the  green.     Yet  the  soul  and  centre  of  such  revels  always  lay, 

/  not  in  these  alien  professional  spectacula,  but  in  other  entertain- 
ments, home-grown  and  racy  of  the  soil,  wherein  the  peasants 
shared,  not  as  onlookers  only,  but  as  performers,  even  as 
their  fathers  and  mothers,  from  immemorial  antiquity,  had 
done  before  them.  A  full  consideration  of  the  village  ludi 
is  important  to  the  scheme  of  the  present  book  for  more  than 
one  reason.     They  shared  with  the  ludi  of  the  minstrels  the 

/  hostility  of  the  Church.  They  bear  witness,  at  point  after 
point,  to  the  deep-lying  dramatic  instincts  of  the  folk.  And 
their  substantial  contribution  to  mediaeval  and  Renaissance 
drama  and  dramatic  spectacle  is  greater  than  has  been  fully 
recognized. 

Historically,  the  ludi  of  the  folk  come  into  prominence  with 
the  attacks  made  upon  them  by  the  reforming  ecclesiastics  of 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK 


91 


the  thirteenth  century  and  in  particular  by  Robert  Grosseteste, 
bishop  of  Lincoln  *.  Between  1 236  and  1 244  Grosseteste  issued 
a  series  of  disciplinary  pronouncements,  in  which  he  condemned 
many  customs  prevalent  in  his  diocese.  Amongst  these  are 
included  miracle  plays,  'scotales'  or  drinking-bouts,  'ram- 
raisings  '  and  other  contests  of  athletic  prowess,  together  with 
ceremonies  known  respectively  as  the  festum  stultoruvi  and 
the  Inductio  Mali  sive  Autumni2.  Very  similar  are  the 
prohibitions  contained  in  the  Constitutions  (1240)  of  Walter 
de  Chanteloup,  bishop  of  Worcester 3.  These  particularly 
specify  the  Indus  de  Regc  et  Regina,  a  term  which  may  be 
taken  as  generally  applicable  to  the  typical  English  folk- 
festival,  of  which  the  Inductio  Mali  sive  Autumni,  the 
'  May-game '  and  '  mell-supper,'  mentioned  by  Grosseteste, 
are  varieties  4.     Both  this  Indus,  in  its  various  forms,  and  the 


1  Stephens-Hunt,  ii.  301  ;  F.  S. 
Stevenson,  Robert  Grosseteste,  126. 
The  disciplinary  attack  seems 
to  have  begun  with  Grosseteste's 
predecessor,  Hugh  de  Wells,  in 
1230  (Wilkins,  i.  627),  but  he,  like 
Roger  West- ham,  bishop  of  Coventry 
and  Lichfield,  in  1252  {Annates  Mo- 
nastiei,  R.  S.  i.  296),  merely  con- 
demns tudi,  a  term  which  may  mean 
folk-festivals  or  minstrelsy,  or  both. 
A  similar  ambiguity  attaches  to  the 
obligation  of  the  anchoresses  of 
Tarrant  Keyneston  not  to  look  on 
at  a  Indus  {ftleowwe)  in  the  church- 
yard (Ancren  Riivle,  C.  S.  318). 

1  In  1236  Grosseteste  wrote  to  his 
archdeacons  forbidding  'arictum 
super  ligna  et  rotas  elevationes, 
cacterosque  ludos  consimiles,  in  quo 
decertatur  pro  bravio  ;  cum  huius- 
modi  ludorum  tarn  actores  quam 
spectatores,  sicut  evidenter  demon- 
strat  Isidorus,  immolant  daemoni- 
bus, . . .  et  cum  etiam  huiusmodi  ludi 
frequenter  dant  occasiones  irae,  odii, 
pugnae,  et  homicidii.'  His  Consti- 
tutiones  of  1238  say  '  Praecipimus 
etiam  ut  in  singulis  ecclesiis  denun- 
cietur  solenniter  ne  quisquam  levet 
arietes  super  rotas,  vel  alios  ludos 
statuat,  in  quibus  decertatur  pro 
bravio:  nee  huiusmodi  ludis  quis- 
quam intersit,  &c*     About  1244  he 


wrote  again  to  the  archdeacons  : 
'  Faciunt  etiam,  ut  audivimus,  clerici 
ludos  quos  vocant  miracula :  et 
alios  ludos  quos  vocant  Inductioncm 
Maii  sive  Autumni ;  et  laici  scotales 
.  .  .  miracula  etiam  et  ludos  supra 
nominatos  et  scotales,  quod  est  in 
vestra  potestate  facili,  omnino  exter- 
minetis'  (Luard,  Letters  of  Robert 
Grosseteste  (R.  S.)  Efp.  xxii,  lii,  cvii, 
pp.  74,  162,  317).  For  his  condem- 
nations of  the  Feast  of  Fools  cf.  ch. 
xiv. 

3  Const.  Walt,  de  Catitilupo 
(Wilkins,  i.  673)  'prohibemus  cleri- 
cis  .  .  .  nee  sustineant  ludos  lien 
de  Rege  et  Regina,  nee  arietas 
levari,  nee  palaestras  publicas  fieri, 
nee  gildales  inhonestas.'  The  clergy 
must  also  abstain  and  dissuade  the 
laity  from  '  compotationibus  quae 
vocantur  scottales '  (Wilkins,  i. 
672).  On  '  ram-raisings,'  &C,  cf. 
ch.  vii ;  on  '  gildales '  and  '  scotales  ' 
ch.  viii. 

4  Surely  the  reference  is  to  the 
mock  kings  and  queens  of  the  village 
festivals,  and  not,  as  Guy,  521  ; 
J usserand, /./'//.  Hist.  i.  444,  su^gi  -4, 
to  the  question-and-anb\\er  game  of 
Le  Roi  qui  ne  ment  described  in 
Jean  de  Condi's  Sentier  Batu 
(Montaiglon-Raynaud,  iii.  248), 
although  this  is  called  playing 'as 


92 


FOLK  DRAMA 


less  strictly  popular  festum  stultorum,  will  find  ample  illus- 
tration in  the  sequel.  Waiter  de  Chanteloup  also  lays  stress 
upon  an  aggravation  of  the  ludi  inhonesti  by  the  perform- 
ance of  them  in  churchyards  and  other  holy  places,  and  on 
Sundays  or  the  vigils  and  days  of  saints  l. 

The  decrees  of  the  two  bishops  already  cited  do  not  stand 
alone.  About  1 250  the  University  of  Oxford  found  it  necessary 
to  forbid  the  routs  of  masked  and  garlanded  students  in  the 
churches  and  open  places  of  the  city  2.  These  appear  to  have 
been  held  in  connexion  with  the  feasts  of  the  '  nations  '  into 
which  a  mediaeval  university  was  divided.  Articles  of  visitation 
drawn  up  in  connexion  with  the  provisions  of  Oxford  in  1253 
made  inquiry  as  to  several  of  the  obnoxious  ludi  and  as  to 
the  measures  adopted  to  check  them  throughout  the  country  3. 
Prohibitions  are  upon  record  by  the  synod  of  Exeter  in  1287 4, 
and  during  the  next  century  by  the  synod  of  York  in  1367  5, 
and  by  William  of  Wykeham,  bishop  of  Winchester,  in 
1 384  s;   while  the  denunciations  of  the  rulers  of  the  church 


rois  et  as  reines '  in  Adan  de  la 
Hale's  Robin  et  Marion  (ed.  Mon- 
merque-Michel,  121)  and  elsewhere 
(cf.  Guy,  222),  and  possibly  grew 
out  of  the  festival  custom.  Yet 
another  game  of  King  and  Queen, 
of  the  practical  joke  order,  is  de- 
scribed as  played  at  Golspie  by 
Nicholson,  119. 

1  Wilkins,  i.  666. 

2  Anstey,  Munimenta  Academica 
(R.  S.),  i.  18  '  ne  quis  choreas  cum 
larvis  seu  strepitu  aliquo  in  ecclesiis 
vel  plateis  ducat,  vel  sertatus,  vel 
coronatus  corona  ex  foliis  arborum, 
vel  florum  vel  aliunde  composita 
alicubi  incedat  .  .  .  prohibemus.' 

3  Inquisitioties  . .  .  de  vita  et  con- 
versatione  clericorum  et  laicorum 
mAnnales  de  Burton  {Ann.Monast. 
R.  S.  i.  307)  'an  aliqui  laici  mercata, 
vel  ludos,  seu  placita  peculiaria  fieri 
faciant  in  locis  sacris,  et  an  haec 
fuerint  prohibita  ex  parte  episcopi 
.  .  .  An  aliqui  laici  elevaverint 
arietes,  vel  fieri  faciant  schothales, 
vel  decertaverint  de  praeeundo  cum 
vexillis  in  visitatione  matricis  eccle- 
siae.' 


4  Wilkins,  ii.  129  'c.  13  ...  Ne 
quisquam  luctas,  choreas,  vel  alios 
ludos  inhonestos  in  coemeteriis 
exercere  praesumat ;  praecipue  in 
vigiliis  et  festis  sanctorum,  cum 
•huiusmodi  ludos  theatrales  et  ludi- 
briorium  spectacula  introductos 
per  quos  ecclesiarum  coinquinatur 
honestas,  sacri  ordines  detestan- 
tur.' 

5  Wilkins,  iii.  68  'c.  2  .  .  .  nee 
in  ipsis  [locis  sacris]  fiant  lucta- 
tiones,  sagittationes,  vel  ludi.'  A 
special  caution  is  given  against  ludi 
1  in  sanctorum  vigiliis  '  and  '  in  exe- 
quiis  defunctorum.' 

6  T.  F.  Kirby,  Wykehani's  Regis- 
ter (Hampshire  Record  Soc),  ii. 
410,  forbids  '  ad  pilas  ludere,  iacta- 
ciones  lapidum  facere  .  .  .  coreas 
facere  dissolutas,  et  interdum  canere 
cantilenas,  ludibriorum  spectacula 
facere,  saltaciones  et  alios  ludos 
inhonestos  frequentare,  ac  multas 
alias  insolencias  perpetrare,  ex  qui- 
bus  cimeterii  huiusmodi  execracio 
seu  pollucio  frequencius  verisimiliter 
formidetur.' 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  93 

find  an  unofficial  echo  in  that  handbook  of  ecclesiastical 
morality.  Robert  Mannyng  of  Brunne's  Handlyng  Synne l. 
There  is,  however,  reason  to  suppose  that  the  attitude  thus 
taken  up  hardly  represents  that  of  the  average  ecclesiastical 
authority,  still  less  that  of  the  average  parish  priest,  towards 
the  ludi  in  question.  The  condemnatory  decrees  should 
probably  be  looked  upon  as  the  individual  pronouncements 
of  men  of  austere  or  reforming  temper  against  customs  which 
the  laxer  discipline  of  their  fellows  failed  to  touch ;  perhaps 
it  should  rather  be  said,  which  the  wiser  discipline  of  their 
fellows  found  it  better  to  regulate  than  to  ban.  At  any  rate 
there  is  evidence  to  show  that  the  village  ludi,  as  distinct 
from  the  spectacula  of  the  minstrels,  were  accepted,  and  even 
to  some  extent  directed,  by  the  Church.  They  became  part 
of  the  parochial  organization,  and  were  conducted  through  the 
parochial  machinery.  Doubtless  this  was  the  course  of  practical 
wisdom.  But  the  moralist  would  find  it  difficult  to  deny  that 
Robert  Grosseteste  and  Walter  de  Chanteloup  had,  after  all, 
some  reason  on  their  side.  On  the  one  hand  they  could  point 
to  the  ethical  lapses  of  which  the  ludi  were  undoubtedly  the 
cause — the  drunkenness,  the  quarrels,  the  wantonings,  by  which 
they  were  disgraced  2.     And  on  the  other  they  could — if  they 

1  Handlyng  Synne  (ed.  Furnivall),  Or  entyrludes,  or  syngynge, 

p.  148,  1.  4684  :  Or  tabure  bete,  or  of>er  pypynge, 

'  Daunces,  karols,  somour  games,  Alle  swyche  byng  forbodyn  es, 

Of   many    swych    come    many  Whyle     be     prest     stondeb    at 

shames.'  messe ' ; 

This    poem   is    a    free    adaptation  where  the  Manuel  de  Pe"chd  has 

(ti303)   of   the  thirteenth-century  '  Karoles  ne  lutes  nul  deit  fere, 

Anglo-Norman  Manuel  de   Pich<f,  En    seint    eglise    qe    me    veut 

which  is  probably  by  William  de  crere ; 

Wadington,  but  has  been  ascribed  Car  en  cymiter  neis  karoler 

to  Bishop  Grosseteste  himself.  The  Est  outrage  grant,  ou  luter : 

corresponding  lines  in  this  are  Souent  lur  est  mes  auenu 

'  Muses  et  tieles  musardries,  Qe  la  fet  tel  maner  de  iu  ; 

Trippes,  dances,  et  teles  folies.'  Qe  grant  peche  est,  desturber 

Cf.  also  Handlyng  Synne,  p.  278,  Le  prestre  quant  deit  celebrer.' 

1,  g989  :  2  The  Puritan  Fetherston,  in  his 

'  Karolles,  wrastlynges,  or  somour  Dialogue  agaynst  light,  lewde,  and 

games,  lascivious  Dancing  (1583),  sign.  D. 

Who  so  euer  haunteb  any  swyche  7,  says  that  he  has  '  hearde  of  tenne 

shames,  maidens  which  went  to  set  May,  and 

Yy   cherche,   ober  yn  cherche-  nine  of  them  came  home  with  childe.' 

jerde,  Stubbes,  i.  149,  has  a  very  similar 

Of  sacrylage  he  may  be  a  ferde  ;  observation.     Cf.  the  adventures  of 


94  FOLK  DRAMA 

were  historically  minded — recall  the  origin  of  the  objectionable 
rites  in  some  of  those  obscure  survivals  of  heathenism  in  the 
rustic  blood,  which  half  a  dozen  centuries  of  Christianity  had 
failed  to  purge1.  For  if  the  comparative  study  of  religions 
proves  anything  it  is,  that  the  traditional  beliefs  and  customs 
of  the  mediaeval  or  modern  peasant  are  in  nine  cases  out  of 
ten  but  the  detritus  of  heathen  mythology  and  heathen  worship, 
enduring  with  but  little  external  change  in  the  shadow  of  an 
hostile  creed.  This  is  notably  true  of  the  village  festivals 
and  their  ludi.  Their  full  significance  only  appears  when  they 
are  regarded  as  fragments  of  forgotten  cults,  the  naive  cults 
addressed  by  a  primitive  folk  to  the  beneficent  deities  of  field 
and  wood  and  river,  or  the  shadowy  populace  of  its  own 
dreams.  Not  that  when  even  the  mediaeval  peasant  set  up 
his  Maypole  at  the  approach  of  summer  or  drove  his  cattle 
through  the  bonfire  on  Midsummer  eve,  the  real  character  of 
his  act  was  at  all  explicit  in  his  consciousness.  To  him,  as  to 
his  descendant  of  to-day,  the  festival  was  at  once  a  practice 
sanctioned  by  tradition  and  the  rare  amusement  of  a  strenuous 
life :  it  was  not,  save  perhaps  in  some  unplumbed  recesses  of 
his  being,  anything  more  definitely  sacred.  At  most  it  was 
held  to  be  '  for  luck,'  and  in  some  vague  general  way,  to  the 
interest  of  a  fruitful  year  in  field  and  fold.  The  scientific 
anthropologist,  however,  from  his  very  different  point  of  view, 
cannot  regard  the  conversion  to  Christianity  as  a  complete 
solution  of  continuity  in  the  spiritual  and  social  life  of  western 
Europe.  This  conversion,  indeed,  was  clearly  a  much  slower 
and-more  incomplete  process  than  the  ecclesiastical  chroniclers 
quite  plainly  state.  It  was  so  even  on  the  shores  of  the 
Mediterranean.  But  there  the  triumph  of  Christianity  began 
from  below.  Long  before  the  edict  of  Milan,  the  new  religion, 
in  spite  of  persecutions,  had  got  its  firm  hold  upon  the  masses 
of  the  great  cities  of  the  Empire.     And  when,  less  than  a 

Dr.  Fitzpiers  and  Suke  Damson  on  (560-636), Etymologiarwn,-x.v\\\.2j , 

Midsummer  Eve  in  Thomas  Hardy's  De  ludis  circensibus  {P.  L.  lxxxii. 

novel,  The  IVoodlanders,  ch.  xx.  653).   This,  of  course,  refers  directly 

1  Grosseteste,    in     1236,    quotes  to    the    religious     associations    of 

'Isidorus'  as  to  the   pagan  origin  Roman  rather  than  Celto-Teutonic 

of '  ludi,  in  quo  decertatur  de  bravio'  ludi. 
The  reference  is  to  Isidore  of  Seville 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  95 

century  later,  Theodosius  made  the  public  profession  of  any 
other  faith  a  crime,  he  was  but  formally  acknowledging 
a  chose  juge'e.  But  even  in  these  lands  of  the  first  ardour  the 
old  beliefs  and,  above  all,  the  old  rituals  died  hard.  Lingering 
unacknowledged  in  the  country,  the  pagan,  districts,  they 
passed  silently  into  the  dim  realm  of  folk-lore.  How  could 
this  but  be  more  so  when  Christianity  came  with  the  mission- 
aries of  Rome  or  of  Iona  to  the  peoples  of  the  West  ?  For 
with  them  conversion  was  hardly  a  spontaneous,  an  individual 
thing.  As  a  rule,  the  baptism  of  the  king  was  the  starting- 
point  and  motive  for  that  of  his  followers  :  and  the  bulk  of 
the  people  adopted  wonderingly  an  alien  cult  in  an  alien 
tongue  imposed  upon  them  by  the  will  of  their  rulers. 
Such  a  Christianity  could  at  best  be  only  nominal.  Ancient 
beliefs  are  not  so  easily  surrendered :  nor  are  habits  and 
instincts,  deep-rooted  in  the  lives  of  a  folk,  thus  lightly  laid 
down  for  ever,  at  the  word  of  a  king.  The  churches  of  the 
West  had,  therefore,  to  dispose  somehow  of  a  vast  body  of 
practical  heathenism  surviving  in  all  essentials  beneath  a  new 
faith  which  was  but  skin-deep.  The  conflict  which  followed 
is  faintly  adumbrated  in  the  pages  of  Bede :  something  more 
may  be  guessed  of  its  fortunes  by  a  comparison  of  the 
customs  and  superstitions  recorded  in  early  documents  of 
church  discipline  with  those  which,  after  all,  the  peasantry 
long  retained,  or  even  now  retain. 

Two  letters  of  Gregory  the  Great,  written  at  the  time  of  the 
mission  of  St.  Augustine,  are  a  key  to  the  methods  adopted 
by  the  apostles  of  the  West.  In  June  601,  writing  to  Ethelbert 
of  Kent  by  the  hands  of  abbot  Mellitus,  Gregory  bade  the 
new  convert  show  zeal  in  suppressing  the  worship  of  idols,  and 
throwing  down  their  fanes1.  Having  written  thus,  the  pope 
changed  his  mind.  Before  Mellitus  could  reach  England,  he 
received  a  letter  instructing  him  to  expound  to  Augustine 
a  new  policy.  '  Do  not,  after  all,'  wrote  Gregory,  'pull  down 
the  fanes.  Destroy  the  idols  ;  purify  the  buildings  with  holy 
water  ;  set  relics  there  ;  and  let  them  become  temples  of  the 
true  God.     So  the  people  will  have  no  need  to  change  their 

1  Haddan-Stubbs,  iii.  30  '  idolorum  cultus  insequere,  fanorum  aedificia 
everate.' 


96  FOLK  DRAMA 

places  of  concourse,  and  where  of  old  they  were  wont  to 
sacrifice  cattle  to  demons,  thither  let  them  continue  to  resort 
on  the  day  of  the  saint  to  whom  the  church  is  dedicated,  and 
slay  their  beasts  no  longer  as  a  sacrifice,  but  for  a  social  meal 
in  honour  of  Him  whom  they  now  worship  V  There  can  be 
little  doubt  that  the  conversion  of  England  proceeded  in  the 
main  on  the  lines  thus  laid  down  by  Gregory.  Tradition  has 
it  that  the  church  of  Saint  Pancras  outside  the  walls  of  Canter- 
bury stands  on  the  site  of  a  fane  at  which  Ethelbert  himself 
once  worshipped 2  ;  and  that  in  London  St.  Paul's  replaced 
a  temple  and  grove  of  Diana,  by  whom  the  equivalent 
Teutonic  wood-goddess,  Freyja,  is  doubtless  intended3. 
Gregory's  directions  were,  perhaps,  not  always  carried  out 
quite  so  literally  as  this.  When,  for  instance,  the  priest  Coifi, 
on  horseback  and  sword  in  hand,  led  the  onslaught  against 
the  gods  of  Northumbria,  he  bade  his  followers  set  fire  to  the 
fane  and  to  all  the  hedges  that  girt  it  round  4.  On  the  other 
hand,  Reduald,  king  of  East  Anglia,  must  have  kept  his  fane 
standing,  and  indeed  he  carried  the  policy  of  amalgamation 

l  Bede, Hist.  Eccl.  i.  30  ;  Haddan-  nitatem  celebrent ;  nee  diabolo  iam 

Stubbs,  iii.  37  '  Dicite  [Augustino],  animalia  immolent,  sed  ad  laudem 

quid  diu  mecum  de  causa  Anglorum  Dei  in  esum  suum  animalia  occidant, 

cogitans    tractavi  :    videlicet    quia  et  donatori  omnium  de  satietate  sua 

fana    idolorum    destrui    in   eadem  gratias  referant  :   ut  dum  eis  aliqua 

gente   minime  debeant ;    sed    ipsa  exterius  gaudia  reservantur,  ad  inte- 

quae  in  illis  sunt  idola  destruantur,  riora  gaudia  consentire  facilius  va- 

aqua  benedicta  fiat,  in  eisdem  fanis  leant.     Nam  duris  mentibus  simul 

aspergatur,     altaria    construantur,  omnia  abscindere  impossibile  esse 

reliquiae   ponantur  :    quia   si  fana  non    dubium    est,    quia   et   is   qui 

eadem   bene   constructa   sunt,  ne-  summum  locum  ascendere   nititur 

cesse  est  ut  a  cultu  daemonum  in  gradibus    vel   passibus   non  autem 

obsequium  veri  Dei  debeant  com-  saltibus  elevatur '.  .  . 

mutari,   ut   dum  gens   ipsa  eadem  2  Stanley,  Memorials  of  Canter- 

fana  sua  non  videt  destrui,  de  corde  bury,  37. 

errorem  deponat,  et  Deum  verum  3  H.  B.  Wheatley,  London,  Past 

cognoscens    ac    adorans,   ad  loca,  and  Present,  iii.  39  ;  Donne,  Poems 

quae    consuevit,    familiarius     con-  (Muses'  Library),  ii.  23. 

currat.     Et    quia   boves   solent    in  "  Bede,  ii.  13    '  iussit  sociis   de- 

sacrificio  daemonum   multos   occi-  struere   ac  succendere  fanum  cum 

dere,   debet   eis   etiam   hac   de   re  omnibus  septis  suis.'     In  Essex  in 

aliqua  solemnitas  immutari :  ut  die  a  time  of  plague  and  famine  (664), 

dedicationis,  vel  natalitii  sanctorum  Sigheri  and  his  people  '  coeperunt 

martyrum    quorum    illic    reliquiae  fana,  quae  derelicta  sunt,  restaurare, 

ponuntur,  tabernacula  sibi  circa  eas-  et  adorare  simulacra.'  Bp.  Jaruman 

dem  ecclesias  quae  ex  fanis  com-  induced  them  to  reopen  the  churches, 

mutatae    sunt,   de   ramis  arborum  'relictis  sive  destructis   fanis  aris- 

faciant,et  religiosis  conviviis  sollem-  que  '  (Bede,  iii.  30). 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  97 

further  than  its  author  intended,  for  he  wavered  faint-heartedly 
between  the  old  religion  and  the  new,  and  maintained  in  one 
building  an  altare  for  Christian  worship  and  an  aritla  for 
sacrifice  to  demons 1.  Speaking  generally,  it  would  seem  to 
have  been  the  endeavour  of  the  Christian  missionaries  to  effect 
the  change  of  creed  with  as  little  dislocation  of  popular  senti- 
ment as  possible.  If  they  could  extirpate  the  essentials,  or 
what  they  considered  as  the  essentials,  of  heathenism,  they 
were  willing  enough  to  leave  the  accidentals  to  be  worn  away 
by  the  slow  process  of  time.  They  did  not,  probably,  quite 
realize  how  long  it  would  take.  And  what  happened  in 
England,  happened  also,  no  doubt,  on  the  continent,  save 
perhaps  in  such  districts  as  Saxony,  where  Christianity  was 
introduced  vi  et  armts,  and  therefore  in  a  more  wholesale,  if 
not  in  the  end  a  more  effectual  fashion  2. 

The  measure  of  surviving  heathenism  under  Christianity 
must  have  varied  considerably  from  district  to  district.  Much 
would  depend  on  the  natural  temper  of  the  converts,  on  the 
tact  of  the  clergy  and  on  the  influence  they  were  able  to 
secure.  Roughly  speaking,  the  old  worships  left  their  trace 
upon  the  new  society  in  two  ways.  Certain  central  practices, 
the  deliberate  invocation  of  the  discarded  gods,  the  deliberate 
acknowledgement  of  their  divinity  by  sacrifice,  were  bound  to 
be  altogether  proscribed  3.  And  these,  if  they  did  not  precisely 

1  Bede,  ii.  15.  So  too  in  eighth-  Poesie  und  Prosa  aus  dent  8.-12. 
century  Germany  there  were  priests  Jahrhundert,  1892,  No.  Ii)  speci- 
who  were  equally  ready  to  sacrifice  fically  renounces  '  Thuner  ende 
to  Wuotan  and  to  administer  the  Uuoden  ende  Saxnote  ende  allum 
sacrament  of  baptism  (Gummere,  them  unholdum  the'  hira  genotas 
342).  See  also  Grimm,  i.  7,  and  sint.'  Anglo-Saxon  laws  and  council 
the  letter  of  Gregory  the  Great  to  decrees  contain  frequent  references 
queen  Brunichildis  in  M.  G.  H.  to  sacrifices  and  other  lingering 
Epist.  ii.  I.  7  'pervenit  ad  nos,  remnants  of  heathenism.  Cf.  Court- 
quod  multi  Christianorum  et  ad  cils  of  Pincanhale  and  Cealcythe 
ecclesias  occurrant,  et  a  culturis  (787),  c.  19  (Haddan-Stubbs,  iii. 
daemonum  non  abscedant.'  458)  '  si  quid   ex    ritu  paganorum 

2  Willibald  (Gesch.-Schreiber  der  remansit,  avellatur,  contemnatur, 
deutschen  Vorzeit,  27)  relates  that  abiiciatur. '  Council  of  Gratlea 
in  Germany,  when  Boniface  felled  (928),  c.  3  (Vvilkins,  i.  205)  'dixi- 
the  sacred  oak  of  Thor(robur  Iovis)  mus  .  .  .  de  sacrifices  barbaris .  .  . 
he  built  the  wood  into  a  church.  si    quis    aliquem  occiderit  .  .  .   ut 

s  A  Saxon  formula  abrenuntia-      vitam   suam   perdat.'      Council  of 
tionis  of  the  ninth  century  (Mullen-      London  (1075)  (Vvilkins,  i.  363)  '  ne 
hoff-Scherer,  Denkmaler  deutscher     offa  mortuorum  animalium,   quasi 

CHAMBERS.     I  J{ 


98 


FOLK  DRAMA 


vanish,  at  least  went  underground,  coming  to  light  only  as 
shameful  secrets  of  the  confessional x  or  the  witch-trial 2,  or 
when  the  dominant  faith  received  a  rude  shock  in  times  of 
especial  distress,  famine  or  pestilence  3.  Others  again  were 
absorbed  into  the  scheme  of  Christianity  itself.  Many  of  the 
protective  functions,  for  instance,  of  the  old  pantheon  were 
taken  over  bodily  by  the  Virgin  Mary,  by  St.  John,  St.  Michael, 
St.  Martin,  St.  Nicholas,  and  other  personages  of  the  new 
dispensation  4.  And  in  particular,  as  we  have  seen  shadowed 
forth  in  Pope  Gregory's  policy,  the  festal  customs  of  heathenism, 
purified  so  far  as  might  be,  received  a  generous  amount  of 
toleration.  The  chief  thing  required  was  that  the  outward 
and  visible  signs  of  the  connexion  with  the  hostile  religion 


pro  vitanda  animalium  peste,  ali- 
cubi  suspendantur ;  nee  sortes,  vel 
aruspicia,  seu  divinationes,  vel  ali- 
qua  huiusmodi  opera  diaboli  ab 
aliquo  exerceantur.'  Also  Leges  of 
Wihtred  of  Kent  (696),  c.  12 
(Haddan-Stubbs,  iii.  235),  and  other 
A.-S.   laws   quoted  by   Kemble,  i. 

523- 

1  Penitential  of  Theodore  (Had- 
dan-Stubbs, iii.  189),  i.  15,  de  Cnl- 
tura  Idolorum  ;  Penitential  of  Eg- 
bert (H.-S.  iii.  424),  8,  de  Auguriis 
•vel  Divinationibus. 

2  Pearson,  ii.  1  (Essay  on  Wo- 
man as  Witch) ;  cf.  A.-S.  spells  in 
Kemble,  i.  528,  and  Cockayne, 
Leechdoms  (R.  S.),  iii.  35,  55.  Early 
and  mediaeval  Christianity  did  not 
deny  the  existence  of  the  heathen 
gods,  but  treated  them  as  evil 
spirits,  demons. 

3  An  Essex  case  of  664  has  just 
been  quoted.  Kemble,  i.  358,  gives 
two  later  ones  from  the  Chronicle 
of  Lanercost.  In  1268  '  cum  hoc 
anno  in  Laodonia  pestis  grassaretur 
in  pecudes  armenti,  quam  vocant 
usitate  Lungessouth,  quidam  bestia- 
les,  habitu  claustrales  non  animo, 
docebant  idiotas  patriae  ignem  con- 
frictione  de  lignis  educere  et  simula- 
chrum  Priapi  statuere,  et  per  haec 
bestiis  succurrere.'  In  1282  '  sacer- 
dos  parochialis,  nomine  Johannes, 
Priapi  prophana  parans,  congrega- 
tis  ex  villa  puellulis,  cogebat   ejs, 


choreis  factis,  Libero  patri  circuire.' 
By  Priapus-Liber  is  probably 
meant  Freyr,  the  only  Teutonic 
god  known  to  have  had  Priapic 
characteristics  (Adam  of  Bremen, 
Gesta  Hammaburge?isis  Eccles. 
Pontif.  iv.  26  in  M.  G.  H.  Script. 
vii.  267). 

*  Grimm,  i.  5,  11,  64,  174;  iii. 
xxxiv-xlv  ;  Keary,  90  ;  Pearson,  ii. 
16,  32,  42,  243,  285,  350.  The  Vir- 
gin Mary  succeeds  to  the  place  of 
the  old  Teutonic  goddess  of  fertility, 
Freyja,  Nerthus.  So  elsewhere 
does  St.  Walpurg.  The  toasts  or 
minni  drunk  to  Odin  and  Freyja 
are  transferred  to  St.  John  and  St. 
Gertrude.  The  travels  of  Odin  and 
Loki  become  the  travels  of  Christ 
and  St.  Peter.  Many  examples  of 
the  adaptation  of  pre-existing  cus- 
toms to  Christianity  will  be  found 
in  the  course  of  this  book.  A  capi- 
tulary of  Karlmann,  drawn  up  in 
742  after  the  synod  of  Ratisbon 
held  by  Boniface  in  Germany, 
speaks  of 'hostias  immolatitias,quas 
stulti  homines  iuxta  ecclesias  ritu 
pagano  faciunt  sub  nomine  sancto- 
rum martyrum  vel  confessorum ' 
(Boretius,  Capitularia  Reg.  Franc. 
i.  24  in  M.  G.  H.  ;  Mansi,  xii.  367). 
At  Kirkcudbright  in  the  twelfth 
century  bulls  were  killed  '  as  an 
alms  and  oblation  to  St.  Cuthbert 
(F.  L.  x.  353). 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  99 

should  be  abandoned.  Nor  was  this  such  a  difficult  matter. 
Cult,  the  sum  of  what  man  feels  it  obligatory  upon  him  to  do 
in  virtue  of  his  relation  to  the  unseen  powers,  is  notoriously 
a  more  enduring  thing  than  belief,  the  speculative,  or  mythology, 
the  imaginative  statement  of  those  relations.  And  it  was  of 
the  customs  themselves  that  the  people  were  tenacious,  not 
of  the  meaning,  so  far  as  there  was  still  a  meaning,  attached 
to  them,  or  of  the  names  which  their  priests  had  been  wont  to 
invoke.  Leave  them  but  their  familiar  revels,  and  the  ritual 
so  indissolubly  bound  up  with  their  hopes  of  fertility  for  their 
flocks  and  crops,  they  would  not  stick  upon  the  explicit 
consciousness  that  they  drank  or  danced  in  the  might  of 
Eostre  or  of  Freyr.  And  in  time,  as  the  Christian  inter- 
pretation of  life  became  an  everyday  thing,  it  passed  out  of 
sight  that  the  customs  had  been  ritual  at  all.  At  the  most 
a  general  sense  ,of  their  '  lucky '  influence  survived.  But  to 
stop  doing  them  ;  that  was  not  likely  to  suggest  itself  to  the 
rustic  mind.  And  so  the  church  and  the  open  space  around 
the  church  continued  to  be,  what  the  temple  and  the  temple 
precinct  had  been,  the  centre,  both  secular  and  religious,  of  the 
village  life.  From  the  Christian  point  of  view,  the  arrange- 
ment had  its  obvious  advantages.  It  had  also  this  disadvantage, 
that  so  far  as  obnoxious  elements  still  clung  to  the  festivals, 
so  far  as  the  darker  practices  of  heathenism  still  lingered,  it 
was  precisely  the  most  sacred  spot  that  they  defiled.  Were 
incantations  and  spells  still  muttered  secretly  for  the  good 
will  of  the  deposed  divinities?  it  was  the  churchyard  that 
was  sure  to  be  selected  as  the  nocturnal  scene  of  the  unhallowed 
ceremony.  Were  the  clergy  unable  to  cleanse  the  yearly 
wake  of  wanton  dance  and  song  ?  it  was  the  church  itself, 
by  Gregory's  own  decree,  that  became  the  focus  of  the 
riot. 

The  partial  survival  of  the  village  ceremonies  under  Christi- 
anity will  appear  less  surprising  when  it  is  borne  in  mind  that 
the  heathenism  which  Christianity  combated  was  itself  only 
the  final  term  of  a  long  process  of  evolution.  The  worshippers 
of  the  Keltic  or  Teutonic  deities  already  practised  a  traditional 
ritual,  probably  without  any  very  clear  conception  of  the 
rationale  on  which  some  at  least  of  the  acts  which  they  per- 
il a 


100  FOLK  DRAMA 

formed  were  based.     These  acts  had  their  origin  far  back  in 
the  history  of  the  religious  consciousness  ;  and  it  must  not  be 
supposed,  because  modern  scholarship,  with  its  comparative 
methods,  is  able  to  some  extent   to  reconstruct  the  mental 
conditions  out  of  which  they  arose,  that  these  conditions  were 
still  wholly  operative  in  the  sixth,  any  more  than   in   the 
thirteenth   or    the    twentieth   century.      Side  by-  side   with 
customs  which  had  still  their  definite  and  intelligible  signi- 
ficance, religious  conservatism  had  certainly  preserved  others 
of  a  very  primitive  type,  some  of  which  survived  as  mere 
fossils,  while  others  had  undergone   that   transformation  of 
intention,  that  pouring  of  new  wine  into  old  bottles,  which  is 
one  of  the  most  familiar  features  in  the  history  of  institutions. 
The  heathenism  of  western  Europe  must  be  regarded,  there- 
fore, as  a  group   of  religious   practices   originating  in  very 
different  strata  of  civilization,  and  only  fused  together  in  the 
continuity  of  tradition.     Its  permanence  lay  in  the  law  of 
association  through  which  a  piece  of  ritual  originally  devised 
by  the  folk  to  secure  their  practical  well-being  remained,  even 
after  the  initial  meaning  grew  obscure,  irrevocably  bound  up 
with  their  expectations  of  that  well-being.     Its  interest  to  the 
student  is  that  of  a  development,  rather  than  that  of  a  system. 
Only   the   briefest    outline    of   the   direction    taken   by  this 
development   can  be   here  indicated.     But   it  must  first  be 
pointed  out   that,  whether    from   a   common    derivation,  or 
through  a  similar  intellectual  structure  reacting  upon  similar 
conditions  of  life,  it  seems,  at  least  up  to  the  point  of  emer- 
gence of  the  fully  formed  village  cult,  to  have  proceeded  on 
uniform  lines,  not  only  amongst  the  Teutonic  and  Keltic  tribes 
who  inhabited  western  and  northern  Europe  and  these  islands, 
but  also  amongst  all  the  Aryan-speaking  peoples.     In  par- 
ticular, although  the   Teutonic  and   the  Keltic   priests   and 
bards  elaborated,  probably  in   comparatively  late  stages  of 
their   history,  very  different   god-names   and   very  different 
mythologies,  yet  these  are  but  the  superstructure  of  religion  ; 
and  it  is  possible  to  infer,  both  from  the  results  of  folk-lore 
and  from  the  more  scanty  documentary  evidence,  a  substantial 
identity  throughout  the  whole  Kelto-Teutonic  group,  of  the 
underlying  institutions    of  ritual  and    of  the    fundamental 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK 


101 


theological  conceptions  *.  I  am  aware  that  it  is  no  longer 
permissible  to  sum  up  all  the  facts  of  European  civilization  in 
an  Aryan  formula.  Ethnology  has  satisfactorily  established 
the  existence  on  the  continent  of  at  least  two  important  racial 
strains  besides  that  of  the  blonde  invader  from  Latham-land2. 
But  I  do  not  think  that  any  of  the  attempts  hitherto  made  to 
distinguish  Aryan  from  pre-Aryan  elements  in  folk-lore  have 
met  with  any  measure  of  success  3.  Nor  is  it  quite  clear  that 
any  such  distinction  need  have  been  implied  by  the  difference 
of  blood.  Archaeologists  speak  of  a  remarkable  uniformity 
of  material  culture  throughout  the  whole  of  Europe  during 
the  neolithic  period ;  and  there  appears  to  be  no  special 
reason  why  this  uniformity  may  not  have  extended  to  the 
comparatively  simple  notions  which  man  was  led  to  form  of 
the  not-man  by  his  early  contacts  with  his  environment.  In 
any  case  the  social  amalgamation  of  Aryan  and  pre-Aryan 


1  In  the  present  state  of  Gaulish 
and  still  more  of  Irish  studies,  only 
a  glimmering  of  possible  equations 
between  Teutonic  and  Keltic  gods 
is  apparent. 

2  Recent  ethnological  research  is 
summed  up  in  G.  Vacher  de  La- 
pouge,  L'Aryen  (1899);  W.  Z. 
Ripley,  The  Races  oj 'Europe (1900)  ; 
A.  H.  Keane,  Ethnology  (1896)  ; 
Man,  Past  and  Present  (1899); 
J.  Deniker,  The  Races  of  Man 
(1900)  ;  G.  Sergi,  The  Mediterra- 
nean Race  (1901).  The  three  ra- 
cial types  that,  in  many  pure  and 
hybrid  forms,  mainly  compose  the 
population  of  Europe  may  be  distin- 
guished as  (1)  Homo  Europaeus, 
the  tall  blonde  long-headed  (doli- 
chocephalic) race  of  north  Europe, 
(including  Teutons  and  red-haired 
4  Kelts '),  to  which  the  Aryan  speech 
seems  primarily  to  have  belonged  ; 
(2)  Homo  alpinus,  the  medium 
coloured  and  sized  brachycephalic 
(round-headed)  race  of  central  Eu- 
rope ;  (3)  Homo  meridionalis  (La- 
pouge)  or  mediterranensis  (Keane), 
the  small  dark  dolichocephalic  race 
of  the  Mediterranean  basin  and 
the  western  isles  ( including  dark 
'  Kelts ').     During  the  formative  pe- 


riod of  European  culture  (2)  was 
probably  of  little  importance,  and 
(1)  and  (3)  are  possibly  of  closer 
racial  affinity  to  each  other  than 
either  of  them  is  to  (2). 

3  Gomme,  Ethnology  in  Folk- 
lore, 21  ;  Village  Community,  69; 
Report  of  Brit.  Ass.  (1896),  626  ; 
F.  L.  Congress,  348  ;  F.  L.  x.  129, 
ascribes  the  fire  customs  of  Europe 
to  Aryans  and  the  water  customs 
to  the  pre-Aryans.  A.  Bertrand, 
Religion  des  Gaulois,  68,  considers 
human  sacrifice  characteristically 
pre-Aryan.  There  seems  to  me 
more  hope  of  arriving  at  a  know- 
ledge of  specific  Mediterranean  cults, 
before  the  Aryan  intermixture,  from 
a  study  of  the  stone  amulets  and 
cup-markings  of  the  megaliths  (Ber- 
trand, op.  cit.  42)  or  from  such 
investigations  into  '  Mycenaean  ' 
antiquity  as  that  of  A.J.  Evans, 
Mycenaean  Tree  and  Pillar  Cult 
(1901).  The  speculations  of  Nietz- 
sche, \nA  Genealogy  of  Morals  and 
elsewhere,  as  to  the  altruistic  '  slave ' 
morality  of  the  pre-Aryan  and  the 
self-regarding  morality  of  the  con- 
quering Aryan  '  blond  beast '  are 
amusing  or  pitiful  reading,  accord- 
ing to  one's  mood. 


102  FOLK  DRAMA 

was  a  process  already  complete  by  the  Middle  Ages  ;  and  for 
the  purpose  of  this  investigation  it  seems  justifiable,  and  in 
the  present  state  of  knowledge  even  necessary,  to  treat  the 
village  customs  as  roughly  speaking  homogeneous  throughout 
the  whole  of  the  Kelto-Teutonic  area. 

An  analysis  of  these  customs  suggests  a  mental  history 
somewhat  as  follows.  The  first  relations  of  man  to  the  not- 
man  are,  it  need  hardly  be  said,  of  a  practical  rather  than 
a  sentimental  or  a  philosophic  character.  They  arise  out  of 
an  endeavour  to  procure  certain  goods  which  depend,  in  part 
at  least,  upon  natural  processes  beyond  man's  own  control. 
The  chief  of  these  goods  is,  of  course,  food  ;  that  is  to  say,  in 
a  primitive  state  of  civilization,  success  in  hunting,  whether  of 
berries,  mussels  and  '  witchetty  grubs,'  or  of  more  elusive  and 
difficult  game  ;  and  later,  when  hunting  ceases  to  be  the  main- 
stay of  existence,  the  continued  fertility  of  the  flocks  and 
herds,  which  form  the  support  of  a  pastoral  race,  and  of  the 
cornfields  .and  orchards  which  in  their  turn  come  to  supple- 
ment these,  on  the  appearance  of  agriculture.  Food  once 
supplied,  the  little  tale  of  primitive  man's  limited  conception 
of  the  desirable  is  soon  completed.  Fire  and  a  roof-tree  are 
his  already.  But  he  asks  for  physical  health,  for  success  in 
love  and  in  the  begetting  of  offspring,  and  for  the  power  to 
anticipate  by  divination  that  future  about  which  he  is  always  so 
childishly  curious.  In  the  pursuit,  then,  of  these  simple  goods 
man  endeavours  to  control  nature.  But  his  earliest  essays  in 
this  direction  are,  as  Dr.  Frazer  has  recently  pointed  out,  not 
properly  to  be  called    religion1.     The   magical   charms   by 

1  Frazer,  G.  B.  i.  9   '  The  fun-  at   pleasure   and    at  any  distance 

damental    principles    on   which    it  any  person  of  whom,  or  any  thing 

[savage  magic]  is  based  would  seem  of  which,  he  possesses  a  particle. 

to  be  reducible  to  two  :  first,  that  Magic  of  the  latter  sort,  resting  as 

like  produces  like,  or  that  an  effect  it  does  on  the  belief  in  a  certain 

resembles   its  cause  ;    and  second,  secret  sympathy  which  unites  indis- 

that  things  which  have  once  been  solubly  things  that  have  once  been 

in  contact,  but  have  ceased  to  be  connected    with    each   other    may 

so,  continue  to  act  upon  each  other  appropriately  be  termed  sympathe- 

as   if  the    contact    still    persisted,  tic  in  the  strict  sense  of  the  term. 

From  the  first  of  these  principles,  Magic  of  the  former  kind,  in  which 

the  savage  infers  that  he  can  pro-  the   supposed   cause  resembles    or 

duce  any  desired  effect  merely  by  simulates  the  supposed  effect,  may 

imitating  it ;  from   the   second  he  conveniently  be  described  as  imi- 

concludes   that   he   can    influence  tative  or  mimetic'     Cf.  Jevons,  31 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  103 

which  he  attempts  to  make  the  sun  burn,  and  the  waters  fall, 
and  the  wind  blow  as  it  pleases  him,  certainly  do  not  imply- 
that  recognition  of  a  quasi-human  personality  outside  himself, 
which  any  religious  definition  may  be  supposed  to  require  as 
a  minimum.  They  are  rather  to  be  regarded  as  applications 
of  primitive  science,  for  they  depend  upon  a  vague  general 
notion  of  the  relations  of  cause  and  effect.  To  assume  that 
you  can  influence  a  thing  through  what  is  similar  to  it,  or 
through  what  has  been  in  contact  with  it,  which,  according  to 
Dr.  Frazer,  are  the  postulates  of  magic  in  its  mimetic  and  its 
sympathetic  form  respectively,  may  be  bad  science,  but  at 
least  it  is  science  of  a  sort,  and  not  religion. 

The  magical  charms  play  a  large  part  in  the  village  ritual, 
and  will  be  illustrated  in  the  following  chapter.  Presently, 
however,  the  scientific  spirit  is  modified  by  that  tendency  of 
animism  through  which  man  comes  to  look  upon  the  external 
world  not  as  mere  more  or  less  resisting  matter  to  be  moved 
hither  or  thither,  but  rather  as  a  debateable  land  peopled  with 
spirits  in  some  sense  alive.  These  spirits  are  the  active  forces 
dimly  discerned  by  human  imagination  as  at  work  behind  the 
shifting  and  often  mysterious  natural  phenomena — forces  of 
the  moving  winds  and  waters,  of  the  skies  now  clear,  now 
overcast,  of  the  animal  races  of  hill  and  plain,  of  the  growth 
waxing  and  waning  year  by  year  in  field  and  woodland.  The 
control  of  nature  now  means  the  control  of  these  powers,  and 
to  this  object  the  charms  are  directed.     In  particular,  I  think, 

'  The  savage  makes  the  generaliza-  term  for  this  sort  of  savage  science, 

tion  that  like  produces   like;  and  In  its  ordinary  sense   (the  'black 

then  he  is  provided  with  the  means  art '),   it  certainly  contains  a  large 

of    bringing     about     anything    he  element   of   what   Dr.   Frr.zer   dis- 

wishes,  fqr  to  produce  an  effect  he  tinguishes  from  magic  as  religion, 

has  only  to  imitate  it.     To  cause  a  '  a   propitiation   or   conciliation    of 

wind  to  blow,  he  flaps  a  blanket,  as  powers  superior  to  man  which  are 

the  sailor  still  whistles  to  bring  a  believed  to  direct  and  control  the 

whistling  gale.  ...  If  the  vegeta-  course   of  nature    and    of    human 

tion  requires  rain,  all  that  is  needed  life.'      True,  these  powers  are  not 

is  to  dip   a  branch  in  water,  and  to  whom  the  orthodox    religion    is 

with  it  to  sprinkle  the  ground.     Or  directed,  but  the  approach  to  them  is 

a  spray  of  water  squirted  from  the  religious  in  the  sense  of  the  above 

mouth   will   produce  a  mist   suffi-  definition.     Such  magic  is  in  tact 

ciently   like   the   mist    required  to  an  amalgam  of  charms,  which  are 

produce  the  desired  effect ;  or  black  Dr.    Frazer's   'magic,'    and  spells, 

clouds  of  smoke  will  be  followed  by  which  are  his   '  religion.'      But  so 

black  clouds  of  rain.'     I  do  not  feel  are  many  more  recognized  cults, 
that  magic  is  altogether  a  happy 


104  FOLK  DRAMA 

at  this  stage  of  his  development,  man  conceives  a  spirit  of  that 
food  which  still  remains  in  the  very  forefront  of  his  aspirations, 
of  his  actual  food-plant,  or  of  the  animal  species  which  he 
habitually  hunts1.  Of  this  spirit  he  initiates  a  cult,  which 
rests  upon  the  old  magical  principle  of  the  mastering  efficacy 
of  direct  contact.  He  binds  the  spirit  literally  to  him  by 
wearing  it  as  a  garment,  or  absorbs  it  into  himself  in  a  solemn 
meal,  hoping  by  either  process  to  acquire  an  influence  or 
power  over  it.  Naturally,  at  this  stage,  the  spirit  becomes 
to  the  eye  of  his  imagination  phytomorphic  or  theriomorphic 
in  aspect.  He  may  conceive  it  as  especially  incarnate  in  a 
single  sacred  plant  or  animal.  But  the  most  critical  moment 
in  the  history  of  animism  is  that  at  which  the  elemental  spirits 
come  to  be  looked  upon  as  anthropomorphic,  made  in  the 
likeness  of  man  himself.  This  is  perhaps  due  to  the  identifica- 
tion of  them  with  those  other  quasi-human  spirits,  of  whose 
existence  man  has  by  an  independent  line  of  thought  also 
become  aware.  These  are  the  ghostly  spirits  of  departed 
kinsmen,  still  in  some  shadowy  way  inhabiting  or  revisiting 
the  house-place.  The  change  does  not  merely  mean  that 
the  visible  phytomorphic  and  theriomorphic  embodiments  of 
mental  forces  sink  into  subordination ;  the  plants  and  animals 
becoming  no  more  than  symbols  and  appurtenances  of  the 
anthropomorphic  spirit,  or  temporary  forms  with  which  from 
time  to  time  he  invests  himself.  A  transformation  of  the 
whole  character  of  the  cult  is  involved,  for  man  must  now 
approach  the  spirits,  not  merely  by  charms,  although  con- 
servatism preserves  these  as  an  element  in  ritual,  but  with 
modifications  of  the  modes  in  which  he  approaches  his  fellow 
man.  He  must  beg  their  favour  with  submissive  speech  or 
buy  it  with  bribes.  And  here,  with  prayer  and  oblation, 
religion  in  the  stricter  sense  makes  its  appearance. 

The  next  step  of  man  is  from  the  crowd  of  animistic  spirits 
to  isolate  the  god.  The  notion  of  a  god  is  much  the  old 
notion   of    an    anthropomorphic    elemental   spirit,  widened, 

1  Some  facts  of  European  animal  F.L.xi.227.     The  relation  of  such 

worship  are  dealt  with  in  two  impor-  worship  to  the  group  of  savage  social 

tant  recent  papers,  one  by  S.  Rei-  institutions  classed  as  totemism  is  a 

nach  in  Revue  celtique,  xxi.    269,  difficult  and  far  from  solved  problem, 

the  other  by  N.  W.   Thomas,  in  which  cannot  be  touched  upon  here. 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  105 

exalted,  and  further  removed  from  sense.  Instead  of  a  local 
and  limited  home,  the  god  has  his  dwelling  in  the  whole 
expanse  of  heaven  or  in  some  distant  region  of  space.  He 
transcends  and  as  an  object  of  cult  supplants  the  more 
bounded  and  more  concrete  personifications  of  natural  forces 
out  of  which  he  has  been  evolved.  But  he  does  not  annul 
these :  they  survive  in  popular  credence  as  his  servants  and 
ministers.  It  is  indeed  on  the  analogy  of  the  position  of  the 
human  chief  amongst  his  comitatus  that,  in  all  probability, 
the  conception  of  the  god  is  largely  arrived  at.  Comparative 
philology  seems  to  show  that  the  belief  in  gods  is  common  to 
the  Aryan-speaking  peoples,  and  that  at  the  root  of  all  the 
cognate  mythologies  there  lies  a  single  fundamental  divinity. 
This  is  the  Dyaus  of  the  Indians,  the  Zeus  of  the  Greeks,  the 
Jupiter  of  the  Romans,  the  Tiwaz  (O.H.G.  Ziu,  O.N.  Tyr, 
A.-S.  Tiw)  of  the  Teutons.  He  is  an  embodiment  of  the 
great  clear  sunlit  heavens,  the  dispenser  of  light  to  the  hunts- 
man, and  of  warmth  and  moisture  to  the  crops.  Side  by  side 
with  the  conception  of  the  heaven-god  comes  that  of  his  female 
counterpart,  who  is  also,  though  less  clearly,  indicated  in  all 
the  mythologies.  In  her  earliest  aspect  she  is  the  lady  of  the 
woods  and  of  the  blossoming  fruitful  earth.  This  primary 
dualism  is  an  extremely  important  factor  in  the  explanation  of 
early  religion.  The  all-father,  the  heaven,  and  the  mother- 
goddess,  the  earth,  are  distinct  personalities  from  the  begin- 
ning. It  does  not  appear  possible  to  resolve  one  into  a  mere 
doublet  or  derivative  of  the  other.  Certainly  the  marriage  of 
earth  and  heaven  in  the  showers  that  fertilize  the  crops  is  one 
of  the  oldest  and  most  natural  of  myths.  But  it  is  generally 
admitted  that  myth  is  determined  by  and  does  not  determine 
the  forms  of  cult.  The  heaven-god  and  the  earth-goddess 
must  have  already  had  their  separate  existence  before  the 
priests  could  hymn  their  marriage.  An  explanation  of  the 
dualism  is  probably  to  be  traced  in  the  merging  of  two  cults 
originally  distinct.  These  will  have  been  sex-cults.  Tillage 
is,  of  course,  little  esteemed  by  primitive  man.  It  was  so  with 
the  Germans,  even  up  to  the  point  at  which  they  first  came 
into  contact  with  the  Romans  \  Yet  all  the  Aryan  languages 
1  Gummere,  39 ;  Caesar,  de  B.  G.  iv.  I.  7 ;  vi.  22.  2  ;  Tacitus,  Germ.  26. 


106  FOLK  DRAMA 

show  some  acquaintance  with  the  use  of  grains  \  The  analogy 
with  existing  savages  suggests  that  European  agriculture  in 
its  early  stages  was  an  affair  of  the  women.  While  the  men 
hunted  or  afterwards  tended  their  droves  of  cattle  and  horses, 
the  women  grubbed  for  roots,  and  presently  learnt  to  scratch 
the  surface  of  the  ground,  to  scatter  the  seed,  and  painfully  to 
garner  and  grind  the  scanty  produce  2.  As  the  avocations  of 
the  sexes  were  distinct,  so  would  their  magic  or  their  religion 
be.  Each  would  develop  rites  of  its  own  of  a  type  strictly 
determined  by  its  practical  ambitions,  and  each  would  stand 
apart  from  the  rites  of  the  other.  The  interest  of  the  men 
would  centre  in  the  boar  or  stag,  that  of  the  women  in  the 
fruit-tree  or  the  wheat-sheaf.  To  the  former  the  stone  altar 
on  the  open  hill-top  would  be  holy  ;  to  the  latter  the  dim 
recesses  of  the  impenetrable  grove.  Presently  when  the  god 
concept  appeared,  the  men's  divinity  would  be  a  personifica- 
tion of  the  illimitable  and  mysterious  heavens  beneath  which 
they  hunted  and  herded,  from  which  the  pools  were  filled  with 
water,  and  at  times  the  pestilence  was  darted  in  the  sun  rays  ; 
the  women's  of  the  wooded  and  deep-bosomed  earth  out  of 
which  their  wealth  sprang.  This  would  as  naturally  take 
a  female  as  that  a  male  form.  Agriculture,  however,  was 
not  for  ever  left  solely  to  the  women.  In  time  pasturage  and 
tillage  came  to  be  carried  on  as  two  branches  of  a  single  pur- 
suit, and  the  independent  sex-cults  which  had  sprung  out  of 
them  coalesced  in  the  common  village  worship  of  later  days. 
Certain  features  of  the  primitive  differentiation  can  still  be 
obscurely  distinguished.     Here  and  there  one  or  the  other  sex 

1  Schrader-Jevons,  281,  says  that  the  soil  and   the  narrowed  space 
the    Indo-Europeans    begin    their  for  pasturage.     On  the  other  hand, 
history  'acquainted  with  the  rudi-  V.     Hehn,      Culturpflanzen      und 
ments    of    agriculture,'    but    '  still  Haustiere,  and  Mommsen,  Hist,  of 
possessed  with  nomadic  tendencies.'  Rome,  i.  16,  find  the  traces  of  agri- 
He  adds  that  considerable  progress  culture     amongst     the     undivided 
must  have  been  made  before  the  Indo-Europeans  very   slight ;    the 
dispersion  ofthe  European  branches,  word  yava-^ka,  which  is  common 
and    points    out    that    agriculture  to  the  tongues,  need  mean  nothing 
would  naturally  develop  when  the  more  than  a  wild  cereal, 
migratory  hordes  from  the  steppes  2  Jevons,  240,  255  ;   Pearson,  ii. 
reached  the  great  forests  of  central  42  ;  O.  T.  Mason,  Woma??s  Share 
Europe.     For  this  there  would  be  in  Primitive  Culture,  14. 
two  reasons,  the  greater  fertility  of 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  107 

is  barred  from  particular  ceremonies,  or  a  male  priest  must 
perform  his  mystic  functions  in  woman's  garb.  The  heaven- 
god  perhaps  remains  the  especial  protector  of  the  cattle,  and 
the  earth-goddess  of  the  corn.  But  generally  speaking  they 
have  all  the  interests  of  the  farm  in  a  joint  tutelage.  The 
stone  altar  is  set  up  in  the  sacred  grove  ;  the  mystic  tree  is 
planted  on  the  hill-top  K  Theriomorphic  and  phytomorphic 
symbols  shadow  forth  a  single  godhead  2.  The  earth-mother 
becomes  a  divinity  of  light.  The  heaven-father  takes  up  his 
abode  in  the  spreading  oak. 

The  historic  religions  of  heathenism  have  not  preserved 
either  the  primitive  dualistic  monotheism,  if  the  phrase  may  be 
permitted,  or  the  simplicity  of  divine  functions  here  sketched. 
With  the  advance  of  civilization  the  objects  of  worship  must 
necessarily  take  upon  them  new  responsibilities.  If  a  tribe 
has  its  home  by  the  sea,  sooner  or  later  it  trusts  frail  barks  to 
the  waters,  and  to  its  gods  is  committed  the  charge  of  sea- 
faring. When  handicrafts  are  invented,  these  also  become 
their  care.  When  the  pressure  of  tribe  upon  tribe  leads  to 
war,  they  champion  the  host  in  battle.  Moral  ideas  emerge 
and  attach  themselves  to  their  service :  and  ultimately  they 
become  identified  with  the  rulers  of  the  dead,  and  reign  in  the 
shadowy  world  beyond  the  tomb.  Another  set  of  processes 
combine  to  produce  what  is  known  as  polytheism.  The  con- 
stant application  of  fixed  epithets  to  the  godhead  tends  in  the 
long  run  to  break  up  its  unity.  Special  aspects  of  it  begin  to 
take  on  an  independent  existence.  Thus  amongst  the  Teutonic 
peoples  Tiwaz-Thunaraz,  the  thunderous  sky,  gives  rise  to 
Thunar  or  Thor,  and  Tiwaz-Frawiaz,  the  bounteous  sky,  to 
Freyr.  And  so  the  ancient  heaven-god  is  replaced  by  dis- 
tinct gods  of  rain  and  sunshine,  who,  with  the  mother-goddess, 
form  that  triad  of  divinities  so  prominent  in  several  European 
cults  3.     Again  as  tribes  come  into  contact  with  each  other, 

1  Burne-Jackson,352,362;  Rhys,  'mound'  at  Marlborough  were  piled 

C.  F.  i.  312  ;   F.  L.  v.  339  ;    Dyer,  up. 

133  ;     Ditchfield,    70  ;    cf.   ch.   vi.  2  Frazer,  ii.  261,  deals  very  fully 

One  of  the  hills  so    visited  is  the  with  the  theriomorphic  corn-spirits 

artificial  one  of  Silbury,  and  perhaps  of  folk  belief. 

the   custom    points   to   the    object  3  On  these  triads  and  others  in 

with   which   this   and    the   similar  which  three  male  or  three  female 


108  FOLK  DRAMA 

there  is  a  borrowing  of  religious  conceptions,  and  the  tribal 
deities  are  duplicated  by  others  who  are  really  the  same  in 
origin,  but  have  different  names.  The  mythological  specula- 
tions of  priests  and  bards  cause  further  elaboration.  The 
friendly  national  gods  are  contrasted  with  the  dark  hostile 
deities  of  foreign  enemies.  A  belief  in  the  culture-hero  or 
semi-divine  man,  who  wrests  the  gifts  of  civilization  from  the 
older  gods,  makes  its  appearance.  Certain  cults,  such  as  that 
of  Druidism,  become  the  starting-point  for  even  more  philo- 
sophic conceptions.  The  personal  predilection  of  an  important 
worshipper  or  group  of  worshippers  for  this  or  that  deity 
extends  his  vogue.  The  great  event  in  the  later  history  of 
Teutonic  heathenism  is  the  overshadowing  of  earlier  cults  by 
that  of  Odin  or  Wodan,  who  seems  to  have  been  originally 
a  ruler  of  the  dead,  or  perhaps  a  culture-hero,  and  not  an 
elemental  god  at  all l.  The  multiplicity  of  forms  under  which 
essentially  the  same  divinity  presents  itself  in  history  and  in 
popular  belief  may  be  illustrated  by  the  mother-goddess  of 
the  Teutons.  As  Freyja  she  is  the  female  counterpart  of 
Freyr ;  as  Nerthus  of  Freyr's  northern  doublet,  Njordr.  When 
Wodan  largely  absorbs  the  elemental  functions,  she  becomes 
his  wife,  as  Frija  or  Frigg.  Thr-ough  her  association  with  the 
heaven-gods,  she  is  herself  a  heaven-  as  well  as  an  earth- 
goddess  2,  the  Eostre  of  Bede  3,  as  well  as  the  Erce  of  the 
Anglo-Saxon  ploughing  charm  4.   She  is  probably  the  Tanfana 

figures  appear,  cf.  Bertrand,  341  ;  vocabatur,  et  cui  in  illo  festa  cele- 

A.  Maury,  Croyances  et  L/gendes  brabant,    nomen   habuit ;   a    cuius 

du  Moy 'en  Age  (1896),  &;  Matronen-  nomine  nunc  paschale  tempus  co- 

Kultus    in   Zeitschrift  d.    Vereins  gnominant,  consueto  antiquae   ob- 

f.  Volkskultur,  ii.  24.     I  have  not  servationis  vocabulo  gaudia  novae 

yet  seen  L.  L.  Paine,  The  Ethnic  solemnitatisvocantes.'  There  seems 

Trinities  and  their  Relation  to  the  no  reason  for  thinking  with  Golther 

Christian  Trinity  (1901).  and  Tille,  that  Bede  made  a  mis- 

1  Mogk,  iii.   333  ;  Golther,  298  ;  take.     Charlemagne  took  the  name 

Grimm,  iv.  1709;   Kemble,  i.  335;  dstarmdnoth    for    April,    perhaps 

Rhys,  C.  H.  282  ;  H.  M.  Chadwick,  only    out    of   compliment    to    the 

Cult  of  Othin  (1899).  English,  nuchas  Alcuin,  at  his  court. 

3  Mogk,  iii.  366 ;  Golther,  428.  *  A    Charm  for    unfruitful   or 

3  Mogk,  iii.  374;    Golther,  488;  bewitched  land  (O.Cockayne., Leech- 

Tille,  Y.  and  C.  144 ;  Bede,  de  temp,  doms  of  Early  England,  R.  S.  i.  399) ; 

ratione,  c.  15  (Opera,  ed.  Giles,  vi.  cf.  Grimm,  i.  253;    Golther,  455; 

179) 'Eostur-monath  qui  nunc  pas-  Kdgel,  i.  I.  39.     The  ceremony  has 

chalis  mensis   interpretatur,  quon-  taken  on  a  Christian  colouring,  but 

dam  a  dea  illorum,  quae  Eostre  retains    many    primitive   features. 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  109 

of  Tacitus  and  the  Nehellenia  of  the  Romano-Germanic  votive 
stones.  If  so,  she  must  have  become  a  goddess  of  mariners, 
for  Nehellenia  seems  to  be  the  Isis  of  the  interpretatio  Romance. 
As  earth-goddess  she  comes  naturally  into  relation  with  the 
dead,  and  like  Odin  is  a  leader  of  the  rout  of  souls.  In 
German  peasant-lore  she  survives  under  various  names,  of 
which  Perchta  is  the  most  important ;  in  witch-lore,  as  Diana, 
and  by  a  curious  mediaeval  identification,  as  Herodias  l.  And 
her  more  primitive  functions  are  largely  inherited  by  the 
Virgin,  by  St.  Walpurg  and  by  countless  local  saints. 

Most  of  the  imaginative  and  mythological  superstructure  so 
briefly  sketched  in  the  last  paragraph  must  be  considered  as 
subsequent  in  order  of  development  to  the  typical  village  cult. 
Both  before  and  in  more  fragmentary  shape  after  the  death 
of  the  old  Keltic  and  Teutonic  gods,  that  continued  to  be  in 
great  measure  an  amalgam  of  traditional  rites  of  forgotten 
magical  or  pre-religious  import.  So  far  as  the  conscious- 
ness of  the  mediaeval  or  modern  peasant  directed  it  to  unseen 
powers  at  all,  which  was  but  little,  it  was  rather  to  some  of 
these  more  local  and  bounded  spirits  who  remained  in  the 
train  of  the  gods,  than  to  the  gods  themselves.  For  the  pur- 
poses of  the  present  discussion,  it  is  sufficient  to  think  of  it 
quite  generally  as  a  cult  of  the  spirits  of  fertilization,  without 
attaching  a  very  precise  connotation  to  that  term.  Unlike 
the  domestic  cult  of  the  ancestral  ghosts,  conducted  for  each 
household  by  the  house-father  at  the  hearth,  it  was  communal 
in  character.     Whatever  the  tenure  of  land  may  have  been, 

Strips  of  turf  are  removed,  and  under  the  first  furrow.  Kogel  con- 
masses  said  over  them.  They  are  siders  Erce  to  be  derived  from  ero, 
replaced  after  oil,  honey,  barm,  'earth.'  Brooke,  i.  217,  states  on 
milk  of  every  kind  of  cattle,  twigs  the  authority  of  Montanus  that  a 
of  every  tree,  and  holy  water  have  version  of  the  prayer  preserved  in 
been  put  on  the  spot.  Seed  is  a  convent  at  Corvei  begins  '  Eostar, 
bought  at  a  double  price  from  Eostar,  Eordhanmodor.'  He  adds: 
almsmen  and  poured  into  a  hole  '  nothing  seems  to  follow  from  this 
in  the  plough  with  salt  and  herbs,  clerical  error.'  But  why  an  error  ? 
Various  invocations  are  used,  in-  The  equation  Erce-Eostre  is  con- 
cluding one  which  calls  on  'Erce,  sistent  with  the  fundamental  identity 
Erce,  Erce,  Eorthan  modor,'  and  of  the  light-goddess  and  the  earth- 
implores  the  Almighty  to  grant  her  goddess. 

fertility.    Then  the  plough  is  driven,  '  Tacitus,   Ann.   i.    51  ;    Mogk, 

and  a  loaf,  made  of  every  kind  of  iii.  373  ;  Golther,  458  ;  cf.  ch.  xii. 
corn  with  milk  and  holy  water,  laid 


110  FOLK  DRAMA 

there  seems  no  doubt  that  up  to  a  late  period  '  co-aration,'  or 
co-operative  ploughing  in  open  fields,  remained  the  normal 
method  of  tillage,  while  the  cattle  of  the  community  roamed 
in  charge  of  a  public  herd  over  unenclosed  pastures  and  forest 
lands x.  The  farm,  as  a  self-sufficing  agricultural  unit,  is 
a  comparatively  recent  institution,  the  development  of  which 
has  done  much  to  render  the  village  festivals  obsolete. 
Originally  the  critical  moments  of  the  agricultural  year  were 
the  same  for  the  whole  village,  and  the  observances  which 
they  entailed  were  shared  in  by  all. 

The  observances  in  question,  or  rather  broken  fragments  of 
them,  have  now  attached  themselves  to  a  number  of  different 
outstanding  dates  in  the  Christian  calendar,  and  the  recon- 
struction of  the  original  year,  with  its  seasonal  feasts,  is 
a  matter  of  some  difficulty2.  The  earliest  year  that  can  be 
traced  amongst  the  Aryan-speaking  peoples  was  a  bipartite 
one,  made  up  of  only  two  seasons,  winter  and  summer.  For 
some  reason  that  eludes  research,  winter  preceded  summer, 
just  as  night,  in  the  primitive  reckoning,  preceded  day.  The 
divisions  seem  to  have  been  determined  by  the  conditions  of 
a  pastoral  existence  passed  in  the  regularly  recurring  seasons 
of  central  Europe.  Winter  began  when  snow  blocked  the 
pastures  and  the  cattle  had  to  be  brought  home  to  the  stall  : 
summer  when  the  grass  grew  green  again  and  there  was  once 
more  fodder  in  the  open.  Approximately  these  dates  would 
correspond  to  mid-November  and  mid-March  3.  Actually,  in 
the  absence  of  a  calendar,  they  would  vary  a  little  from  year 

1  Gomme,    Village    Community,      deutschen  Mitt  clatters  (1S91). 

157  ;    B.    C.    A.    Windle,    Life  in  s  In     Scandinavia     the     winter 

Early  Britain,  200 ;   F.  W.  Mait-  naturally  began  earlier  and  ended 

land,  Domesday  Book  and  Beyond,  later.      Throughout,  Scandinavian 

142,  337,  346.  seasons    diverged    from    those    of 

2  I  have  followed  in  many  points  Germany  and  the  British  Isles.  In 
the  views  on  Teutonic  chronology  particular  the  high  summer  feast 
o(Ti\le, Beulsc/ies  IVeinnacltt(iSgs)  and  the  consequent  tripartition  of 
and  Yule  and  Christmas  (1899),  the  year  do  not  seem  to  have  estab- 
which  are  accepted  in  the  main  by  lished  themselves  (C.  P.  B.  i.  430). 
O.  Schrader,  Reallexicon  der  indo-  Further  south  the  period  of  stall- 
germanischenAltertuf/iskunde,  s.vv.  feeding  was  extended  when  a  better 
Jahr,  Jahreszeiten,  and  partly  cor-  supply  of  fodder  made  it  possible 
rect  those  of  Weinhold,  Ueber  die  (Tille,  Y.  and  C.  56,  62  ;  Burne- 
deutsche  Jalirtheilung  (1862),  and  Jackson,  380). 

Grotefend,  Die  Zeitrechnung  des 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  111 

to  year  and  would  perhaps  depend  on  some  significant  annual 
event,  such  as  the  first  snowstorm  in  the  one  case1,  in  the 
other  the  appearance  of  the  first  violet,  butterfly  or  cockchafer, 
or  of  one  of  those  migratory  birds  which  still  in  popular  belief 
bring  good  fortune  and  the  summer,  the  swallow,  cuckoo  or 
stork2.  Both  dates  would  give  occasion  for  religious  cere- 
monies, together  with  the  natural  accompaniment  of  feasting 
and  revel.  More  especially  would  this  be  the  case  at  mid- 
November,  when  a  great  slaughtering  of  cattle  was  rendered 
economically  necessary  by  the  difficulty  of  stall-feeding  the 
whole  herd  throughout  the  winter.  Presently,  however, 
new  conditions  established  themselves.  Agriculture  o-rew 
in  importance,  and  the  crops  rather  than  the  cattle  became 
the  central  interest  of  the  village  life.  Fresh  feasts  sprang  up 
side  by  side  with  the  primitive  ones,  one  at  the  beginning  of 
ploughing  about  mid-February,  another  at  the  end  of  harvest, 
about  mid-September.  At  the  same  time  the  increased 
supply  of  dry  fodder  tended  to  drive  the  annual  slaughtering 
farther  on  into  the  winter.  More  or  less  contemporaneously 
with  these  processes,  the  old  bipartite  year  was  changed  into 
a  tripartite  one  by  the  growth  of  yet  another  new  feast  during 
that  dangerous  period  when  the  due  succession  of  rain  and 
sun  for  the  crops  becomes  a  matter  of  the  greatest  moment  to 
the  farmer.  Early  summer,  or  spring,  was  thus  set  apart 
from  late  summer,  or  summer   proper 3.     This    development 

1  Cf.  ch.  xi,  where  the  winter  languages.  The  Keltic  seasons,  in 
feasts  are  discussed  in  more  detail.  particular,     seem     to     be     closely 

2  Grimm,  ii.  675,  693,  762,  notes  parallel  to  the  Teutonic.  Of  the 
the  heralds  of  summer.  three  great  Keltic  feasts  described 

3  Jahn,  34;  Mogk,  iii.  387;  by  Rhys,  C.  H.  409,  513,  676  ;  C.  F. 
Golther,  572  ;  Schnider-Jevons,  i.  308,  the  Lugnassad  was  probably 
303.  The  Germans  still  knew  three  the  harvest  feast,  the  Samhain  the 
seasons  only  when  they  came  into  old  beginning  of  winter  feast,  and 
contactwiththeRomans  ;  cf.Tacitus,  the  Beltain  the  high  summer  feast. 
Germ.  26  '  annum  quoque  ipsum  The  meaning  of  '  Beltain  '  (cf. 
non  in  totidem  digerunt  species:  N.  E.  D.  s.v.  Beltane)  seems  quite 
hiems  et  ver  et  aestas  intellcctum  uncertain.  A  connexion  is  possible 
acvocabulahabent,autumni  perinde  but  certainly  unproved  with  the 
nomen  ac  bona  ignorantur.'  I  do  Abelio  of  the  Pyrenean  inscriptions, 
not  a^ree  with  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  6,  the  Belenus-Apollo  of  those  of  the 
that  the  tripartition  of  the  year,  in  eastern  Alps,  and,  more  rarely, 
this  pre-calendar  form,  was  'of  Provence  (Roscher,  Lexicon^  s.v. 
foreign  extraction.'  Schrader  shows  Belenus  ;  Holder,  Alt-celtischer 
that   it   is   common    to  the  Aryan  Sprachschatz,%.w. Belenus, Abelio; 


112  FOLK  DRAMA 

also  may  be  traced  to  the  influence  of  agriculture,  whose 
interest  runs  in  a  curve,  while  that  of  herding  keeps  compara- 
tively a  straight  course.  But  as  too  much  sun  or  too  much 
wet  not  only  spoils  the  crops  but  brings  a  murrain  on  the  cattle, 
the  herdsmen  fell  into  line  and  took  their  share  in  the  high 
summer  rites.  At  first,  no  doubt,  this  last  feast  was  a  sporadic 
affair,  held  for  propitiation  of  the  unfavourable  fertilization 
spirits  when  the  elders  of  the  village  thought  it  called  for. 
And  to  the  end  resort  may  have  been  had  to  exceptional 
acts  of  cult  in  times  of  especial  distress.  But  gradually  the 
occasional  ceremony  became  an  annual  one,  held  as  soon  as 
the  corn  was  thick  in  the  green  blade  and  the  critical  days 
were  at  hand. 

So  far,  there  has  been  no  need  to  assume  the  existence  of 
a  calendar.  How  long  the  actual  climatic  conditions  con- 
tinued to  determine  the  dates  of  the  annual  feasts  can  hardly 
be  said.  But  when  a  calendar  did  make  its  appearance,  the 
five  feasts  adapted  themselves  without  much  difficulty  to  it. 
The  earliest  calendar  that  can  be  inferred  in  central  Europe 
was  one,  either  of  Oriental  or  possibly  of  Mediterranean 
provenance,  which  divided  the  year  into  six  tides  of  three- 
score days  each  *.  The  beginnings  of  these  tides  almost 
certainly  fell  at  about  the  middle  of  corresponding  months 
of  the  Roman  calendar 2.  The  first  would  thus  be  marked 
by  the  beginning  of  winter  feast  in  mid-November ;  two 
others  by  the  beginning  of  summer  feast  and  the  harvest 
feast  in  mid-March  and  mid-August  respectively.  A  little 
accommodation  of  the  seasonal  feasts  of  the  farm  would  be 
required  to  adapt  them  to  the  remaining  three.  And  here 
begins  a  process  of  dislocation  of  the  original  dates  of 
customs,  now  becoming  traditional  rather  than  vital,  which 

Ausonius,  Pro/essores,  iv.  7),  or  the  Ecclesiological  Society,  i.  83. 

Bel  of  Bohemia  mentioned  by  Allso  l  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  7,  148,  suggests 

(ch.xii).  The  Semitic  Baal,  although  an  Egyptian  or  Babylonian  origin, 

a  cult  of  Belus,  found  its  way  into  but    the    equation   of   the   Gothic 

the  Roman  world  (cf.  Appendix  N,  Jiuleis    and    the    Cypriote    IXalos, 

No.  xxxii,  and   Wissowa,  302),  is  lovXalos,  lovXlrjos,  lovKios  as  names 

naturally  even  a  less  plausible  re-  for  winter  periods  makes  a  Mediter- 

lation.     But  it  is  dear  to  the  folk-  ranean  connexion  seem  possible, 

etymologist;  cf.  e.g.  S.  M.  Mayhew,  2  Cf.  ch.  xi. 
Baalism  in   Trans,  of  St.  Parts 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK  113 

was  afterwards  extended  by  successive  stages  to  a  bewildering 
degree.  By  this  time,  with  the  greater  permanence  of  agri- 
culture, the  system  of  autumn  ploughing  had  perhaps  been 
invented.  The  spring  ploughing  festival  was  therefore  of  less 
importance,  and  bore  to  be  shifted  back  to  mid-January 
instead  of  mid-February.  Four  of  the  six  tides  are  now 
provided  with  initial  feasts.  These  are  mid-November,  mid- 
January,  mid-March,  and  mid-September.  There  are,  however, 
still  mid-May  and  mid-July,  and  only  the  high  summer  feast 
to  divide  between  them.  I  am  inclined  to  believe  that  a 
division  is  precisely  what  took  place,  and  that  the  hitherto 
fluctuating  date  of  the  summer  feast  was  determined  in  some 
localities  to  mid-May,  in  others  to  mid-July  l. 

The  European  three-score-day-tide  calendar  is  rather  an 
ingenious  conjecture  than  an  ascertained  fact  of  history. 
When  the  Germano-Keltic  peoples  came  under  the  influence 
of  Roman  civilization,  they  adopted  amongst  other  things  the 
Roman  calendar,  first  in  its  primitive  form  and  then  in  the 
more  scientific  one  given  to  it  under  Julius  Caesar.  The  latter 
divided  the  year  into  four  quarters  and  twelve  months,  and 
carried  with  it  a  knowledge  of  the  solstices,  at  which  the 
astronomy  neither  of  Kelts  nor  of  Germans  seems  to  have  pre- 
viously arrived2.  The  feasts  again  underwent  a  process  of  dis- 

1  Grimm, ii.615,  notes  that  Easter  and  this  Sermo  may  have  been 
fires  are  normal  in  the  north,  Mid-  interpolated  in  the  eighth  century 
summer  fires  in  the  south  of  (O.  Reich,  Uber  Audoen's  Lebens- 
Germany.  The  Beltane  fires  both  beschreibioig  des  heiligen  Eligius 
of  Scotland  and  Ireland  are  usually  (1872),  cited  in  Rev.  celtique,  ix. 
on  May  1,  but  some  of  the  Irish  433).  It  is  not  clear  that  the 
examples  collected  by  J.  Jamieson,  un-Romanized  Teuton  or  Kelt  made 
Etym.  Diet,  of  the  Scottish  Lan-  a  god  of  the  sun,  as  distinct  from 
gua^e,  s.  v.,  are  at  midsummer.  the  heaven-god,  who  of  course  has 

2  Tille,  Y.andC.  71  ;  Rhys,  C.  H.  solar  attributes  and  emblems.  In 
419.  The  primitive  yearwas  thermo-  the  same  Sermo  Eligius  says  'nullus 
metric,  not  astronomic,  its  critical  dominos  solem  aut  lunam  vocet, 
moments,  not  the  solstices,  a  know-  neque  per  eos  iuret.'  But  the  notion 
ledge  of  which  means  science,  but  of  '  domini '  may  be  post-Roman, 
the  sensible  increase  and  diminution  and  the  oath  is  by  the  permanent, 
of  heat  in  spring  and  autumn.  The  rather  than  the  divine;  cf.  A.  de 
solstices  came  through  Rome.  Jubainville,  Intr.  i\  VEtude  de  la 
TheSerm0Ettgii(Grimm,iv.  1737)  Litt.  celt.  181.  It  is  noticeable  that 
has  'nullus  in  festivitate  S.  Ioannis  German  names  for  the  sun  are 
vel  quibuslibet  sanctorum  solemni-  originallyfeminine  and  for  the  moon 
tatibus  solstitia . . .  exerceat,'  but  Eli-  masculine. 

gius  was  a  seventh-century  bishop, 

CHAMBERS.     I  I 


114  FOLK  DRAMA 

location  in  order  to  harmonize  them  with  the  new  arrangement. 
The  ceremonies  of  the  winter  feast  were  pulled  back  to  Novem- 
ber i  or  pushed  forward  to  January  i.  The  high  summer  feast 
was  attracted  from  mid-May  and  mid-July  respectively  to 
the  important  Roman  dates  of  the  Floralia  on  May  i  and  the 
summer  solstice  on  June  24.  Last  of  all,  to  complete  the  con- 
fusion, came,  on  the  top  of  three-score-day-tide  calendar  and 
Roman  calendar  alike,  the  scheme  of  Christianity  with  its 
host  of  major  and  minor  ecclesiastical  festivals,  some  of  them 
fixed,  others  movable.  Inevitably  these  in  their  turn  began 
to  absorb  the  agricultural  customs.  The  present  distribution 
of  the  five  original  feasts,  therefore,  is  somewhat  as  follows. 
The  winter  feast  is  spread  over  all  the  winter  half  of  the  year 
from  All  Souls  day  to  Twelfth  night.  A  later  chapter  will 
illustrate  its  destiny  more  in  detail.  The  ploughing  feast  is 
to  be  sought  mainly  in  Plough  Monday,  in  Candlemas  and 
in  Shrovetide  or  Carnival 1 ;  the  beginning  of  summer  feast  in 
Palm  Sunday,  Easter  and  St.  Mark's  day  ;  the  early  variety 
of  the  high  summer  feast  probably  also  in  Easter,  and  certainly 
in  May-day,  St.  George's  day,  Ascensiontide  with  its  Roga- 
tions, Whitsuntide  and  Trinity  Sunday ;  the  later  variety  of 
the  same  feast  in  Midsummer  day  and  Lammastide  ;  and  the 
harvest  feast  in  Michaelmas.  These  are  days  of  more  or  less 
general  observance.  Locally,  in  strict  accordance  with  the 
policy  of  Gregory  the  Great  as  expounded,  to  Mellitus,  the 
floating  customs  have  often  settled  upon  cpnveniently  neigh- 
bouring dates  of  wakes,  rushbearings,  kirmesses  and  other 
forms  of  vigil  or  dedication  festivals  2 ;  and  even,  in  the  utter 

1  Mogk,  iii.  393;  Golther,  584;  'shoot.'     Bede,  de  temp.  rat.  c.  15, 

Jahn,  84;  Caspari,  35;  Saupe,  7;  calls  February  Sol-monath,  which  he 

Hauck,  ii.  357;  Michels,  93.     The  explains  as  'mensis  placentarum.' 

ploughing    feast    is    probably    the  September,  the  month  of  the  harvest- 

spurcalia  of  the  Indiculus  and  of  festival,  is  Haleg-in-math, or  'mensis 

Eadhelm,  de  laudibus  virginitatis,  sacrorum.' 

c.  25,  and  the  dies  spurci  of  the  2  Pfannenschmidt,  244  ;    Brand, 

Horn,   de   Sacrilegiis.     This   term  ii.  1  ;  Ditchfield,  130;  Burne-Jack- 

appears  in  the  later  German  name  son,   439  ;     Burton,    Rushbearing, 

for  February,  Sporkele.     It  seems  147  ;    Schaff,  vi.  544 ;    Duchesne, 

to  be  founded  on  Roman  analogy  385.     The  dedication  of  churches 

from  spurcus,  '  unclean.'     Pearson,  was  solemnly  carried  out  from  the 

ii.  159,  would,  however,  trace  it  to  an  fourth    century,  and   the   anniver- 

Aryan  root  sp/ierag, '  swell,' '  burst,'  sary  observed.     Gregory  the  Great 


THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  FOLK 


115 


oblivion  of  their  primitive  significance,  upon  the  anniversaries 
of  historical  events,  such  as  Royal  Oak  day  on  May  29  \  or 
Gunpowder  day.  Finally  it  may  be  noted,  that  of  the  five 
feasts  that  of  high  summer  is  the  one  most  fully  preserved  in 
modern  survivals.  This  is  partly  because  it  comes  at  a  con- 
venient time  of  year  for  the  out-of-door  holiday-making  which 
serves  as  a  preservative  for  the  traditional  rites  ;  partly  also 
because,  while  the  pastoral  element  in  the  feasts  of  the 
beginnings  of  winter  and  summer  soon  became  comparatively 
unimportant  through  the  subordination  of  pasturage  to  tillage, 
and  the  ploughing  and  harvest  feasts  tended  more  and  more 
to  become  affairs  of,  the  individual  farm  carried  out  in  close 
connexion  with  those  operations  themselves,  the  summer  feast 
retained  its  communal  character  and  continued  to  be  cele- 
brated by  the  whole  village  for  the  benefit  of  everybody's 
crops  and  trees,  and  everybody's  flocks  and  herds2.  It  is 
therefore  mainly,  although  not  wholly,  upon  the  summer  feast 
that  the  analysis  of  the  agricultural  ritual  to  be  given  in  the 
next  chapter  will  be  based. 


ordered  '  solemnitates  ecclesiarum 
dedicationum  per  singulos  annos 
sunt  celebrandae.'  The  A.-S.  Canons 
of  Edgar  (960),  c.  28  (W'ilkins,  i.  227), 
require  them  to  be  kept  with  sobriety. 
Originally  the  anniversary,  as  well 
as  the  actual  dedication  day,  was 
observed  with  an  all  night  watch, 
whence  the  name  vigilia,  wakes. 
Belethus,  de  rat.  offic.  (P.  L.  ccii. 
141),  c.  137,  says  that  the  custom 
was  abolished  owing  to  the  immo- 
rality to  which  it  led.  But  the  '  eve ' 
of  these  and  other  feasts  continued 
to  share  in  the  sanctity  of  the  '  day,' 
a  practice  in  harmony  with  the 
European  sense  of  the  precedence 
of  night  over  day  (cf.  Schrader- 
Jevons,  311;    Bertrand,  267,  354, 


413).  An  Act  of  Convocation  in 
1536  (Wilkins,  iii.  823)  required  all 
wakes  to  be  held  on  the  first  Sunday 
in  October,  but  it  does  not  appear 
to  have  been  very  effectual. 

1  S.  O.  Addy,  in  F.  L.  xii.  394, 
has  a  full  account  of  '  Garland  day' 
at  Castleton,  Derbyshire,  on  May  29; 
cf.  F.  L.  xii.  76  (Wishford,  Wilts) ; 
Burne-Jackson,  365. 

2  The  classification  of  agricultural 
feasts  in  U.  Jahn,  Die  dentschen 
Opfergebrauche,  seems  through- 
out to  be  based  less  on  the  facts 
of  primitive  communal  agriculture, 
than  on  those  of  the  more  elaborate 
methods  of  the  later  farms  with  their 
variety  of  crops. 


I  2 


CHAPTER  VI 
VILLAGE  FESTIVALS 


[Bibliographical  Note. — A  systematic  calendar  of  English  festival  usages 
by  a  competent  folk-lorist  is  much  needed.  J.  Brand,  Observations  on 
Popular  Antiquities  (1777),  based  on  H.  Bourne,  Antiquitates  Vulgares 
(1725  s  and  edited,  first  by  Sir  Henry  Ellis  in  1813,  1841-2  and  1849,  and 
then  by  W.  C.  Hazlitt  in  1870,  is  full  of  valuable  material,  but  belongs  to  the 
age  of  pre-scientific  antiquarianism.  R.  T.  Hampson,  Medii  Acvi  Kalen- 
darium  (1841),  is  no  less  unsatisfactory.  In  default  of  anything  better, 
T.  F.  T.  Dyer,  British  Popular  Customs  (1891),  is  a  useful  compilation 
from  printed  sources,  and  P.  H.  Ditchfield,  Old  English  Customs  (1896), 
a  gossipy  account  of  contemporary  survivals.  These  may  be  supplemented 
from  collections  of  more  limited  range,  such  as  H.  J.  Feasey,  Ancient 
Englisii  Holy  Week  Ceremonial  (1897),  and  J.  E.  Vaux,  Church  Folk-Lore 
(1894) ;  by  treatises  on  local  folk-lore,  of  which  W.  Henderson,  Notes 
on  the  Folk-Lore  of  the  Northern  Counties  of  England  and  the  Borders 
(2nd  ed.  1879),  C.  S.  Burne  and  G.  F.  Jackson,  Shropshire  Folk-Lore 
(1883-5),  and  J.  Rhys,  Celtic  Folk-L^ore,  Welsh  and  Manx  (1901),  are  the 
best ;  and  by  the  various  publications  of  the  Folk-Lore  Society,  especially 
the  series  of  County  Folk-Lore  (1895-9)  ar,d  tne  successive  periodicals, 
The  Folk-Lore  Record  (1878-82),  Folk-Lore  Journal  (1883-9),  and  Folk- 
Lore  (1890-1903).  Popular  accounts  of  French/?/^  are  given  by  E.  Cortet, 
Essai  sur  les  Fetes  religieuses  (1867),  and  O.  Havard,  Les  Fetes  de  nos 
Plres  (1898).  L.  J.  B.  Berenger-Feraud,  Superstitions  et  Survivances 
(1896),  is  more  pretentious,  but  not  really  scholarly.  C.  Leber,  Disserta- 
tions relatives  a  V Histoire  de  France  (1826-38),  vol.  ix,  contains  interesting 
material  of  an  historical  character,  largely  drawn  from  papers  in  the 
eighteenth-century  periodical  L^e  Mercure  de  France.  Amongst  German 
books,  J.  Grimm,  Teutonic  Mythology  (transl.  J.  S.  Stallybrass,  1880-8), 
H.  Pfannenschmidt,  Germanische  Erntefeste  (1878),  and  U.  Jahn,  Die 
deutschen  Opfergebrduche  bei  Ackerbau  und  Viehsucht  (1884),  are  all 
excellent.  Many  of  the  books  mentioned  in  the  bibliographical  note  to 
the  last  chapter  remain  useful  for  the  present  and  following  ones ;  in 
particular  J.  G.  Frazer,  The  Golden  Bough  (2nd  ed.  1900),  is,  of  course, 
invaluable.  I  have  only  included  in  the  above  list  such  works  of  general 
range  as  I  have  actually  made  most  use  of.  Many  others  dealing  with 
special  points  are  cited  in  the  notes.  A  fuller  guide  to  folk-lore  literature 
will  be  found  in  M.  R.  Cox,  Lntroduction  to  Folklore  (2nd  ed.  1897).] 

The  central  fact  of  the  agricultural  festivals  is  the  presence 
in  the  village  of  the  fertilization  spirit  in  the  visible  and 
tangible  form  of  flowers  and  green  foliage  or  of  the  fruits  of 
the  earth.  Thus,  when  the  peasants  do  their  '  observaunce  to 
a  morn  of  May,'  great  boughs  of  hawthorn  are  cut  before 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  117 

daybreak  in  the  woods,  and  carried,  with  other  seasonable 
leafage  and  blossom,  into  the  village  street.  Lads  plant 
branches  before  the  doors  of  their  mistresses.  The  folk  deck 
themselves,  their  houses,  and  the  church  in  green.  Some  of 
them  are  clad  almost  entirely  in  wreaths  and  tutties,  and  be- 
come walking  bushes,  '  Jacks  i'  the  green.'  The  revel  centres 
in  dance  and  song  around  a  young  tree  set  up  in  some  open 
space  of  the  village,  or  a  more  permanent  May-pole  adorned 
for  the  occasion  with  fresh  garlands.  A  large  garland,  often 
with  an  anthropomorphic  representation  of  the  fertilization 
spirit  in  the  form  of  a  doll,  parades  the  streets,  and  is  accom- 
panied by  a  '  king '  or  '  queen,'  or  a  '  king  '  and  '  queen ' 
together.  Such  a  garland  finds  its  place  at  all  the  seasonal 
feasts  ;  but  whereas  in  spring  and  summer  it  is  naturally 
made  of  the  new  vegetation,  at  harvest  it  as  naturally  takes 
the  form  of  a  sheaf,  often  the  last  sheaf  cut,  of  the  corn. 
Then  it  is  known  as  the  'harvest- May'  or  the  'neck,' or  if  it  is 
anthropomorphic  in  character,  as  the  '  kern-baby.'  Summer 
and  harvest  garlands  alike  are  not  destroyed  when  the  festival 
is  over,  but  remain  hung  up  on  the  May-pole  or  the  church 
or  the  barn-door  until  the  season  for  their  annual  renewing 
comes  round.  And  sometimes  the  grain  of  the  'harvest-May' 
is  mingled  in  the  spring  with  the  seed-corn1. 

The  rationale  of  such  customs  is  fairly  simple.  They 
depend  upon  a  notion  of  sympathetic  magic  carried  on  into 
the  animistic  stage  of  belief.  Their  object  is  to  secure  the 
beneficent  influence  of  the  fertilization  spirit  by  bringing 
the  persons  or  places  to  be  benefited  into  direct  contact  with 
the  physical  embodiment  of  that  spirit.  In  the  burgeoning 
quick  set  up  on  the  village  green  is  the  divine  presence. 
The  worshipper  clad  in  leaves  and  flowers  has  made  himself 
a  garment  of  the  god,  and  is  therefore  in  a  very  special  sense 
under  his  protection.  Thus  efficacy  in  folk-belief  of  physical 
contact  may  be  illustrated  by  another  set  of  practices  in 
which  recourse  is  had  to  the  fertilization  spirit  for  the  cure  of 
disease.     A  child  suffering  from   croup,  convulsions,  rickets, 

1  Frazer,  i.  193;  ii.  96:    Brand,  is  minutely  studied  by  S.  O.  Addy, 

i.  125  ;  Dyer,  2^.3  ;  Ditchfield,  95  ;  Garland  Day  at  Castlcton,  in  F.  L. 

Philpot,  144;  Grimm,  ii.  762  ;  &c,  xii.  394. 
&c.  A  single  example  of  the  custom 


118  FOLK  DRAMA 

or  other  ailment,  is  passed  through  a  hole  in  a  split  tree, 
or  beneath  a  bramble  rooted  at  both  ends,  or  a  strip  of  turf 
partly  raised  from  the  ground.  It  is  the  actual  touch  of 
earth  or  stem  that  works  the  healing  K 

May-pole  or  church  may  represent  a  focus  of  the  cult  at 
some  specially  sacred  tree  or  grove  in  the  heathen  village. 
But  the  ceremony,  though  it  centres  at  these,  is  not  con- 
fined to  them,  for  its  whole  purpose  is  to  distribute  the 
benign  influence  over  the  entire  community,  every  field,  fold, 
pasture,  orchard  close  and  homestead  thereof.  At  plough- 
ing, the  driving  of  the  first  furrow ;  at  harvest,  the  home- 
coming of  the  last  wain,  is  attended  with  ritual.  Probably  all 
the  primitive  festivals,  and  certainly  that  of  high  summer, 
included  a  lustration,  in  which  the  image  or  tree  which  stood 
for  the  fertilization  spirit  was  borne  in  solemn  procession  from 
dwelling  to  dwelling  and  round  all  the  boundaries  of  the 
village.  Tacitus  records  the  progress  of  the  earth-goddess 
Nerthus  amongst  the  German  tribes  about  the  mouth  of  the 
Elbe,  and  the  dipping  of  the  goddess  and  the  drowning  of 
her  slaves  in  a  lake  at  the  term  of  the  ceremony 2.  So  too 
at  Upsala  in  Sweden  the  statue  of  Freyr  went  round  when 
winter  was  at  an  end 3  ;  while  Sozomenes  tells  how,  when 
Ulfilas  was  preaching  Christianity  to  the  Visigoths,  Atha- 
naric  sent  the  image  of  his  god  abroad  in  a  wagon,  and  burnt 
the  houses  of  all  who  refused  to  bow  down  and  sacrifice4. 
Such  lustrations  continue  to  be  a  prominent  feature  of  the 
folk  survivals.  They  are  preserved  in  a  number  of  pro- 
cessional customs  in  all  parts  of  England  ;  in  the  municipal 
'  ridings,' '  shows,'  or  '  watches  '  on  St.  George's5  or  Midsummer6 

1  A.  B.Gomme,  ii.  507;  Hartland,  Martini,  0  12,  by  Sulpicius  Severus 
Perseus,  ii.  187;  Grimm,  iv.  1738,  {Opera,  ed.  Halm,  in  Corp.  Script. 
1747  ;  Gaidoz,  Un  vieux  rite  medi-  Eccl.  Hist.  i.  122)  'quia  esset  haec 
cal  (1893).  Gallorum  rusticis  consuetudo,  simu- 

2  Tacitus,  Germania,  40.  lacradaemonurn,candidotectavela- 
8  Vigfusson  and  Ungar,  Flatey-      mine,  misera  per  agros  suos  circum- 

jarbok,  i.  337;  Grimm,  i.  107;  Gum-  ferre  dementia,'  and  Alsso's  account 

mere,  G.  O.  433  ;  Mogk,  iii.  321 ;  of  the  fifteenth-century  calendisa- 

Golther,  228.  tiones  in  Bohemia  (ch.  xii). 

4  Sozomenes,  Hist.  Eccles.  vi.  yj.  5  Cf.  ch.  x. 

Cf.  also  Indiculus  (ed.  Saupe,  32)  6  Cf.    Representations    (Chester, 

'de    simulacro,  quod   per   campos  London,  York).   There  were  similar 

portant,'  the  fifth-century   Vita  S.  watches  at  Nottingham  (Deering, 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  119 

days  ;  in  the  '  Godiva '  procession  at  Coventry  *,  the  '  Bezant ' 
procession  at  Shaftesbury 2.  Hardly  a  rural  merry-making  or 
wake,  indeed,  is  without  its  procession  ;  if  it  is  only  in  the 
simple  form  of  the  quite  which  the  children  consider  them- 
selves entitled  to  make,  with  their  May-garland,  or  on  some 
other  traditional  pretext,  at  various  seasons  of  the  calendar. 
Obviously  in  becoming  mere  quetes,  collections  of  eggs,  cakes 
and  so  forth,  or  even  of  small  coins,  as  well  as  in  falling 
entirely  into  the  hands  of  the  .children,  the  processions  have 
to  some  extent  lost  their  original  character.  But  the  notion 
that  the  visit  is  to  bring  good  fortune,  or  the  '  May '  or  the 
'summer'  to  the  household,  is  not  wholly  forgotten  in  the 
rhymes  used  3.  An  interesting  version  of  the  ceremony  is 
the  'furry'  or  'faddy'  dance  formerly  used  at  Helston 
wake;  for  in  this  the  oak-decked  dancers  claimed  the  right 
to  pass  in  at  one  door  and  out  at  another  through  every 
house  in  the  village4. 

Room  has  been  found  for  the  summer  lustrations  in  the 
scheme  of  the  Church.  In  Catholic  countries  the  statue  of 
the  local  saint  is  commonly  carried  round  the  village,  either 
annually  on  his  feast-day  or  in  times  of  exceptional  trouble  5. 
The  inter-relations  of  ecclesiastical  and  folk-ritual  in  this  re- 
spect are  singularly  illustrated  by  the  celebration  of  St.Ubaldo's 
eve  (May  15)  at  Gubbio  in  Umbria.  The  folk  procession  of 
the  Ceri  is  a  very  complete  variety  of  the  summer  festival. 
After  vespers  the  clergy  also  hold  a  procession  in  honour  of 
the  saint.  At  a  certain  point  the  two  companies  meet.  An 
interchange  of  courtesies  takes  place.  The  priest  elevates 
the  host ;  the  bearers  of  the  Ceri  bow  them  to  the  ground  ; 
and  each  procession  passes  on  its  way 6.  In  England  the 
summer  lustrations  take  an  ecclesiastical  form  in  the  Roga- 

Hist.    of  Nott.    123),    Worcester  3  Cf.  ch.  viii. 

(Smith,  English  Gilds,  408),  Lydd  4  Dyer,  275  ;  Ditchfield,  in  ;  cf. 

and  Bristol  (Green,  Town  Life  in  the  phrase  '  in  and  out  the  windows ' 

the  Fifteenth  Century,  i.  148),  and  of  the   singing   game  Round  and 

on    St.  Thomas's   day  (July  7)   at  Round  the  Village  (A.  B.  Gomme, 

Canterbury   {Arch,   Cant.   xii.   34;  s.  v.). 

Hist.  MSS.  ix.  1.  148).  6  M.    Deloche,  Le  Tour    de    la 

1  Harris,    7  ;    Hartland,    Fairy  Lunade,  in  Rev.  celtique,  ix.  425  ; 
Tales,  71.  Berenger-Fe"raud,  i.  423  >  ni-  l67- 

2  Dyer,  205.  *  Bower,  13. 


120 


FOLK  DRAMA 


tions  or  '  bannering '  of  '  Gang-week,'  a  ceremony  which  itself 
appears  to  be  based  on  very  similar  folk-customs  of  southern 
Europe1.  Since  the  Reformation  the  Rogations  have  come 
to  be  regarded  as  little  more  than  a  '  beating  of  the  bounds.' 
But  the  declared  intention  of  them  was  originally  to  call  for 
a  blessing  upon  the  fruits  of  the  earth  ;  and  it  is  not  difficult 
to  trace  folk-elements  in  the  '  gospel  oaks  '  and  'gospel  wells' 
at  which  station  was  made  and  the  gospel  read,  in  the  peeled 
willow  wands  borne  by  the  boys  who  accompany  the  pro- 
cession, in  the  whipping  or  '  bumping '  of  the  said  boys  at  the 
stations,  and  in  the  choice  of  '  Gang-week '  for  such  agri- 
cultural rites  a?  '  youling  '  and  '  well-dressing  2.' 

Some  anthropomorphic  representation  of  the  fertilization 
spirit  is  a  common,  though  not  an  invariable  element  in  the 
lustration.-  A  doll  is  set  on  the  garland,  or  some  popular 
'giant'  or  other  image  is  carried  round3.  Nor  is  it  sur- 
prising  that   at  the   early  spring   festival  which   survives  in 


1  Duchesne,  276;  Usener,  i.  293  ; 
Tille,  Y.  and  C.  5 1  ;  W.  W.  Fowler, 
124;  Boissier,  La  Religion  romaine, 
i.  323.  The  Rogations  or  litaniae 
minores  represent  in  Italy  the  Am- 
barvalia  on  May  29.  But  they  are 
of  Gallican  origin,  were  begun  by 
Mamertus,  bishop  of  Vienne  (1470;, 
adapted  by  the  Council  of  Orleans 
(511),  c.  27  (Mansi,  viii.  355),  and 
required  by  the  English  Council  of 
Clovesho  (747),  c.  16  (Haddan- 
Stubbs,  iii.  368),  to  be  held  '  non 
admixtis  vanitatibus,  uti  mos  est 
plurimis,  vel  negligentibus,  vel  im- 
peritis,  id  est  in  ludis  et  equorum 
cursibus,  et  epulis  maioribus.'  Jahn, 
147,  quotes  the  German  abbess 
Marcsuith  (940),  who  describes 
them  as  '  pro  gentilicio  Ambarvali,' 
and  adds,  'confido  autem  de  Patroni 
huius  misericordia,  quod  sic  ab  eo 
gyrade  terrae  semina  uberius  pro- 
venient,  et  variae  aeris  inclemen- 
tiae  cessent.'  Mediaeval  Rogation 
litanies  are  in  Sarum  Processional, 
103,  and  York  Processional  {York 
Manual,  182).  The  more  strictly 
Roman  litania  major  on  St.  Mark's 
day  (March  25)  takes  the  place  of 
the  Rubigalia,  but  is  not  of  great 


importance  in  English  folk-custom. 

2  Injunctions,  ch.  xix,  of  1559 
(Gee- Hardy,  Docts.  illustrative  of 
English  Church  History,  426). 
Thanks  are  to  be  given  to  God  'for 
the  increase  and  abundance  of  his 
fruits  upon  the  face  of  the  earth.' 
The  Book  of  Homilies  contains  an 
exhortation  to  be  used  on  the  occa- 
sion. The  episcopal  injunctions  and 
interrogatories  in  Ritual  Commis- 
sion, 404,  409,  416,  &c,  endeavour 
to  preserve  the  Rogations,  and  to 
eliminate  '  superstition  '  from  them  ; 
for  the  development  of  the  notion 
of  '  beating  of  bounds,'  cf.  the 
eighteenth-century  notices  in  Dyer, 
Old  English  Social  Life,  196. 

3  The  image  is  represented  by 
the  doll  of  the  May-garland,  which 
has  sometimes,  according  to  Ditch- 
field,  102,  become  the  Virgin  Mary, 
with  a  child  doll  in  its  arms,  and  at 
other  times  (e.  g.  Castleton,  E.  L. 
xii.  469)  has  disappeared,  leaving 
the  name  of  '  queen '  to  a  particular 
bunch  of  flowers  ;  also  by  the  'giant' 
of  the  midsummer  watch.  The 
Salisbury  giant,  St.  Christopher, 
with  his  hobby-horse,  Hob-nob,  is 
described  in  Rev.  d.  T.  P.  iv.  601. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  121 

Plough  Monday,  the  plough  itself,  the  central  instrument  of 
the  opening  labour,  figures.  A  variant  of  this  custom  may 
be  traced  in  certain  maritime  districts,  where  the  functions  of 
the  agricultural  deities  have  been  extended  to  include  the 
oversight  of  seafaring.  Here  it  is  not  a  plough  but  a  boat 
or  ship  that  makes  its  rounds,  when  the  fishing  season  is 
about  to  begin.  Ship  processions  are  to  be  found  in  various 
parts  of  Germany 1 ;  at  Minehead,  Plymouth,  and  Devonport 
in  the  west  of  England,  and  probably  also  at  Hull  in  the 
north 2. 

The  magical  notions  which,  in  part  at  least,  explain  the 
garland  customs  of  the  agricultural  festival,  are  still  more 
strongly  at  work  in  some  of  its  subsidiary  rites.  These 
declare  themselves,  when  understood,  to  be  of  an  essentially 
practical  character,  charms  designed  to  influence  the  weather, 
and  to  secure  the  proper  alternation  of  moisture  and  warmth 
which  is  needed  alike  for  the  growth  and  ripening  of  the 
crops  and  for  the  welfare  of  the  cattle.  They  are  probably 
even  older  than  the  garland-customs,  for  they  do  not  imply 
the  animistic  conception  of  a  fertilization  spirit  immanent  in 
leaf  and  blossom ;  and  they  depend  not  only  upon  the 
1  sympathetic '  principle  of  influence  by  direct  contact  already 
illustrated,  but  also  upon  that  other  principle  of  similarity 
distinguished  by  Dr.  Frazer  as  the  basis  of  what  he  calls 
'  mimetic '  magic.  To  the  primitive  mind  the  obvious  way 
of  obtaining  a  result  in  nature  is  to  make  an  imitation  of  it 
on  a  small  scale.  To  achieve  rain,  water  must  be  splashed 
about,  or  some  other  characteristic  of  a  storm  or  shower  must 
be  reproduced.  To  achieve  sunshine,  a  fire  must  be  lit,  or 
some  other  representation  of  the  appearance  and  motion  of 
the  sun  must  be  devised.  Both  rain-charms  and  sun-charms 
are  very  clearly  recognizable  in  the  village  ritual. 

As  rain-charms,  conscious  or  unconscious,  must  be  classified 

1  Grimm,  i.  257  ;  Golther,  463  ;  the  currus  navalis  used  by  Roman 

Mogk,  iii.  374  ;   Hahn,  Demeter  und  women.      A    modern    survival    at 

Bai/bo,  38;  Uscner,  Die  Sinljluth-  Frejus  is  described  in  F.  L.  xii.  307. 

sagen,    115.      There    are    parallels  2  Ditchfield,   103;    Transactions 

in    south    European    custom,    both  of  Devonshire  Association,  xv.  104; 

classical  and  modern,  and  Usener  cf.  the  Noah's   ship  procession  at 

even   derives   the   term   'carnival,'  Hull  (Representation s,  s. v.). 
not  from  camem  ievare,  but  from 


122  FOLK  DRAMA 

the  many  festival  customs  in  which  bathing  or  sprinkling  holds 
an  important  place.  The  image  or  bough  which  represents 
the  fertilization  spirit  is  solemnly  dipped  in  or  drenched  with 
water.  Here  is  the  explanation  of  the  ceremonial  bathing 
of  the  goddess  Nerthus  recorded  by  Tacitus.  It  has  its 
parallels  in  the  dipping  of  the  images  of  saints  in  the  feast- 
day  processions  of  many  Catholic  villages,  and  in  the  buckets 
of  water  sometimes  thrown  over  May-pole  or  harvest-May. 
Nor  is  the  dipping  or  drenching  confined  to  the  fertilization 
spirit.  In  order  that  the  beneficent  influences  of  the  rite 
may  be  spread  widely  abroad,  water  is  thrown  on  the  fields 
and  on  the  plough,  while  the  worshippers  themselves,  or 
a  representative  chosen  from  among  them,  are  sprinkled  or 
immersed.  To  this  practice  many  survivals  bear  evidence ; 
the  virtues  persistently  ascribed  to  dew  gathered  on  May 
morning,  the  ceremonial  bathing  of  women  annually  or  in 
times  of  drought  with  the  expressed  purpose  of  bringing 
fruitfulness  on  man  or  beast  or  crop,  the  '  ducking '  customs 
which  play  no  inconsiderable  part  in  the  traditions  of  many 
a  rural  merry-making.  Naturally  enough,  the  original  sense 
of  the  rite  has  been  generally  perverted.  The  'ducking'  has 
become  either  mere  horse-play  or  else  a  rough-and-ready 
form  of  punishment  for  offences,  real  or  imaginary,  against 
the  rustic  code  of  conduct.  The  churl  who  will  not  stop 
working  or  will  not  wear  green  on  the  feast-day  must  be 
1  ducked,'  and  under  the  form  of  the  '  cucking-stool,'  the 
ceremony  has  almost  worked  its  way  into  formal  juris- 
prudence as  an  appropriate  treatment  for  feminine  offenders. 
So,  too,  it  has  been  with  the  '  ducking  '  of  the  divinity.  When 
the  modern  French  peasant  throws  the  image  of  his  saint 
into  the  water,  he  believes  himself  to  be  doing  it,  not  as 
a  mimetic  rain-charm,  but  as  a  punishment  to  compel  a 
power  obdurate  to  prayer  to  grant  through  fear  the  required 
boon. 

The  rain-charms  took  place,  doubtless,  at  such  wells, 
springs,  or  brooks  as  the  lustral  procession  passed  in  its 
progress  round  the  village.  It  is  also  possible  that  there  may 
have  been,  sometimes  or  always,  a  well  within  the  sacred 
grove   itself  and   hard   by   the    sacred    tree.     The   sanctity 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  123 

derived  by  such  wells  and  streams  from  the  use  of  them  in 
the  cult  of  the  fertilization  spirit  is  probably  what  is  really 
intended  by  the  water-worship  so  often  ascribed  to  the 
heathen  of  western  Europe,  and  coupled  closely  with  tree- 
worship  in  the  Christian  discipline-books.  The  goddess  of 
the  tree  was  also  the  goddess  of  the  well.  At  the  con- 
version her  wells  were  taken  over  by  the  new  religion.  They 
became  holy  wells,  under  the  protection  of  the  Virgin  or  one 
of  the  saints.  And  they  continued  to  be  approached  with 
the  same  rites  as  of  old,  for  the  purpose  of  obtaining  the 
ancient  boons  for  which  the  fertilization  spirit  had  always 
been  invoked.  It  will  not  be  forgotten  that,  besides  the  public 
cult  of  the  fertilization  spirit  for  the  welfare  of  the  crops 
and  herds,  there  was  also  a  private  cult,  which  aimed  at 
such  more  personal  objects  of  desire  as  health,  success  in 
love  and  marriage,  and  divination  of  the  future.  It  is  this 
private  cult  that  is  most  markedly  preserved  in  modern  holy 
well  customs.  These  may  be  briefly  summarized  as  follows  \ 
The  wells  are  sought  for  procuring  a  husband  or  children, 
for  healing  diseases,  especially  eye-ailments  or  warts,  and  for 
omens,  these  too  most  often  in  relation  to  wedlock.  The 
worshipper  bathes  wholly  or  in  part,  or  drinks  the  water. 
Silence  is  often  enjoined,  or  a  motion  deasil,  that  is,  with 
the  sun's  course,  round  the  well.  Occasionally  cakes  are 
eaten,  or  sugar  and  water  drunk,  or  the  well-water  is  splashed 
on  a  stone.  Very  commonly  rags  or  bits  of  wool  or  hair  are 
laid  under  a  pebble  or  hung  on  a  bush  near  the  well,  or  pins, 
more  rarely  coins  or  even  articles  of  food,  are  thrown  into  it. 
The  objects  so  left  are  not  probably  to  be  regarded  as  offerings  ; 
the  intention  is  rather  to  bring  the  worshipper,  through  the 
medium  of  his  hair  or  clothes,  or  some  object  belonging  to 
him,  into  direct  contact  with  the  divinity.  The  close  con- 
nexion between  tree-  and  well-cult  is  shown  by  the  use  of 

the  neighbouring  bush  on  which  to  hang  the  rags.     And  the 

i 

1  Brand,  ii.  223  ;  Grimm,  ii.  584  ;  Couch,  Ancient  and  Holy  Wells  of 

Elton,  284  ;  Gorame,  Ethnology,  73  ;  Cornwall  (1894) ;  J.  Rhys,  C.  F.  i. 

Hartland,  Perseus,  ii.  175  ;  Haddon,  332,  354,  and  in  F.  L.  iii.  74.  iv.  55  5 

362;  Vaux,  269;  Wood-Martin,  ii.  A.  W.  Moore,  in  F.L.  v.  212  ;  H.C. 

46  ;  BeVenger-Fdraud,  iii.  291 ;  R.  C.  March,  in  F.  L.  x.  479  (Dorset). 
Hope,  Holy  Wells;  M.-L.  Quiller- 


124  FOLK  DRAMA 

practice  of  dropping  pins  into  the  well  is  almost  exactly 
paralleled  by  that  of  driving  nails  '  for  luck  '  into  a  sacred  tree 
or  its  later  representative,  a  cross  or  saintly  image.  The  theory 
may  be  hazarded  that  originally  the  sacred  well  was  never 
found  without  the  sacred  tree  beside  it.  This  is  by  no  means 
the  case  now ;  but  it  must  be  remembered  that  a  tree  is  much 
more  perishable  than  a  well.  The  tree  once  gone,  its  part  in 
the  ceremony  would  drop  out,  or  be  transferred  to  the  well. 
But  the  original  rite  would  include  them  both.  The  visitant, 
for  instance,  would  dip  in  the  well,  and  then  creep  under 
or  through  the  tree,  a  double  ritual  which  seems  to  survive  in 
the  most  curious  of  all  the  dramatic  games  of  children, '  Draw 
a  Pail  of  Water  V 

The  private  cult  of  the  fertilization  spirit  is  not,  of  course, 
tied  to  fixed  seasons.  Its  occasion  is  determined  by  the 
needs  of  the  worshipper.  But  it  is  noteworthy  that  the 
efficacy  of  some  holy  wells  is  greatest  on  particular  days, 
such  as  Easter  or  the  first  three  Sundays  in  May.  And  in 
many  places  the  wells,  whether  ordinarily  held  '  holy '  or  not, 
take  an  important  place  in  the  ceremonies  of  the  village  festival. 
The  '  gospel  wells '  of  the  Rogation  processions,  and  the  well 
to  which  the  '  Bezant '  procession  goes  at  Shaftesbury  are 
cases  in  point ;  while  in  Derbyshire  the  '  well-dressings  '  corre- 
spond to  the  '  wakes,'  '  rushbearings,'  and  '  Mayings '  of  other 
districts.  Palm  Sunday  and  Easter  Sunday,  as  well  as  the 
Rogation  days,  are  in  a  measure  Christian  versions  of  the 
heathen  agricultural  feasts,  and  it  is  not,  therefore,  surprising 
to  find  an  extensive  use  of  holy  water  in  ecclesiastical  ritual, 
and  a  special  rite  of  Benedictio  Fontium  included  amongst 
the  Easter  ceremonies 2.  But  the  Christian  custom  has  been 
moralized,  and  its  avowed  aim  is  purification  rather  than 
prosperity. 

The  ordinary  form  of  heat-charm  was  to  build,  in  semblance 

1  A.  B.  Gomme,  s.  v. ;  Haddon,  lichen  Cultus  (1869).  The  Bene- 
362.  dictio  Fontium  took  place  on  Easter 

2  Schaff,  iii.  247  ;  Duchesne,  281,  Saturday,  in  preparation  for  the 
385  ;  Rock,  iii.  2. 101, 180;  Maskell,  baptism  which  in  the  earliest  times 
i.  cccxi ;  Feasey,  235  ;  Wordsworth,  was  a  characteristic  Easter  rite.  The 
24;  Pfannenschmidt,  Das  Weih-  formulae  are  in  York  Missal,  i.  121 ; 
wasser  im  heidnischen  und  christ-  Sarum  Missal,  350;  Maskell,  i.  13. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  125 

of  the  sun,  the  source  of  heat,  a  great  fire l.  Just  as  in  the 
rain-charm  the  worshippers  must  be  literally  sprinkled  with 
water,  so,  in  order  that  they  may  receive  the  full  benefits  of 
the  heat-charm,  they  must  come  into  direct  physical  contact 
with  the  fire,  by  standing  in  the  smoke,  or  even  leaping 
through  the  flames,  or  by  smearing  their  faces  with  the 
charred  ashes 2.  The  cattle  too  must  be  driven  through  the  fire, 
in  order  that  they  may  be  fertile  and  free  from  pestilence 
throughout  the  summer ;  and  a  whole  series  of  observances 
had  for  their  especial  object  the  distribution  of  the  preserving 
influence  over  the  farms.  The  fires  were  built  on  high  ground, 
that  they  might  be  visible  far  and  wide.  Or  they  were  built 
in  a  circle  round  the  fields,  or  to  windward,  so  that  the  smoke 
might  blow  across  the  corn.  Blazing  arrows  were  shot  in  the 
air,  or  blazing  torches  carried  about.  Ashes  were  sprinkled 
over  the  fields,  or  mingled  with  the  seed  corn  or  the  fodder 
in  the  stall 3.  Charred  brands  were  buried  or  stuck  upright  in 
the  furrows.  Further,  by  a  simple  symbolism,  the  shape  and 
motion  of  the  sun  were  mimicked  with  circular  rotating 
bodies.  A  fiery  barrel  or  a  fiery  wheel  was  rolled  down  the 
hill  on  the  top  of  which  the  ceremony  took  place.  The 
lighted  torches  were  whirled  in  the  air,  or  replaced  by  lighted 
disks  of  wood,  flung  on  high.  All  these  customs  still  linger 
in  these  islands  or  in  other  parts  of  western  Europe,  and  often 
the  popular  imagination  finds  in  their  successful  performance 
an  omen  for  the  fertility  of  the  year. 

On  a  priori  grounds  one  might  have  expected  two  agricul- 
tural festivals  during  the  summer ;  one  in  the  earlier  part  of 
it,  when  moisture  was  all-important,  accompanied  with  rain- 
charms  ;  the  other  later  on,  when  the  crops  were  well  grown 

1  Frazer,  iii.  237;  Gomme,  in  Brit,  chimney-sweeps'  holiday. 

Ass.  Rep.  (1896),   626;    Simpson,  s  The  reasons  given  are  various, 

195  ;  Grenier,  380;  Gaidoz,  16 ;  Ber-  '  to  keep  off  hail '  (whence  the  term 

trand,  98  ;    Gummere,   1.  O.  400 ;  Hagelfeuer  mentioned  by  Pfannen- 

Grimm,  ii.  601;  Jahn,  25;  Brand,  schmidt, 67), 'vermin,' 'caterpillars,' 

i.   127,   166;    Dyer,  269,  311,  332;  '  blight,' '  to  make  the  fields  fertile.' 

Ditchfield,  141 ;  Cortet,  211.  In  Bavaria  torches  are  carried  round 

-  To  this   custom  may  possibly  the  fields 'to  drive  away  the  wicked 

be  traced  the  black-a-vised  figures  sower' (of  tares  ?).   In  Northumber- 

who  are  persistent  in  the  folk  ludi,  land  raids  are  made  on  the  ashes  of 

and     also     the     curious    tradition  neighbouring  villages  (Dyer,  332). 
which  makes  May-day  especially  the 


126 


FOLK  DRAMA 


and  heat  was  required  to  ripen  them,  accompanied  with  sun- 
charms.  But  the  evidence  is  rather  in  favour  of  a  single 
original  festival  determined,  in  the  dislocation  caused  by 
a  calendar,  to  different  dates  in  different  localities l.  ■  The 
Midsummer  or  St.  John's  fires  are  perhaps  the  most  widely- 
spread  and  best  known  of  surviving  heat-charms.  But  they 
can  be  paralleled  by  others  distributed  all  over  the  summer 
cycle  of  festivals,  at  Easter2  and  on  May-day,  and  in  con- 
nexion with  the  ploughing  celebrations  on  Epiphany,  Candle- 
mas, Shrovetide,  Quadragesima,  and  St.  Blaize's  day.  It  is 
indeed  at  Easter  and  Candlemas  that  the  Bene  die  tiones, 
which  are  the  ecclesiastical  versions  of  the  ceremony,  appear 
in  the  ritual-books 3.  On  the  other  hand,  although,  perhaps 
owing  to  the  later  notion  of  the  solstice,  the  fires  are  greatly 
prominent  on  St.  John's  day,  and  are  explained  with  con- 
siderable ingenuity  by  the  monkish  writers 4,  yet  this  day 
was  never  a  fire-festival  and  nothing  else.  Garland  customs 
are  common  upon  it,  and  there  is  even  evidence,  though  slight 

1  Cf.  p.  113. 

2  I  know  of  no  English  Easter 
folk-fires,  but  St.  Patrick  is  said  to 
have  lit  one  on  the  hill  of  Slane, 
opposite  Tara,  on  Easter  Eve,  433 
(Feasey,  180). 

3  Schaff,  v.  403  ;  Duchesne,  240 ; 
Rock,  iii.  2.  71,  94,  98,  107,  244  ; 
Feasey,  184;  Wordsworth,  204; 
Frazer,  iii.  245  ;  Jahn,  129  ;  Grimm, 
ii.616;  Simpson,  198.  The  formulae 
of  the  benedictio  ignis  and  benedictio 
cereorum  at  Candlemas,  and  the 
benedictio  ignis,  benedictio  incensi, 
and  benedictio  cerei  on  Easter  Eve, 
are  in  Sarum  Missal,  334,  697 ; 
York  Missal,  i.  109;  ii.  17.  One 
York  MS.  has  '  Paschae  ignis  de 
berillo  vel  de  silice  exceptus  .  .  . 
accenditur.'  The  correspondence 
between  Pope  Zacharias  and  St. 
Boniface  shows  that  the  lighting  of 
the  ignis  by  a  crystal  instead  of 
from  a  lamp  kept  secretly  burning 
distinguished  Gallican  from  Roman 
ceremonial  in  the  eighth  century 
(Jaffe,  2291).  All  the  lights  in  the 
church  are  previously  put  out,  and 
this  itself  has  become  a  ceremony 
in    the    Tenebrae.      Ecclesiastical 


symbolism  explained  the  extinction 
and  rekindling  of  lights  as  typifying 
the  Resurrection.  Sometimes  the 
ignis  provides  a  light  for  the  folk- 
fire  outside. 

4  Belethus  (+  1 162),  de  Div.  Offic. 
c.  137  (P.  L.  ccii.  141),  gives  three 
customs  of  St.  John's  Eve.  Bones 
are  burnt,  because  (1)  there  are 
dragons  in  air,  earth,  and  water, 
and  when  these  '  in  aere  ad  libidi- 
nem  concitantur,  quod  fere  fit,  saepe 
ipsum  sperma  vel  in  puteos  vel  in 
aquas  fluviales  eiiciunt,  ex  quo  le- 
thalis  sequitur  annus,'  but  the  smoke 
of  the  bonfires  drives  them  away ; 
and  (2)  because  St.  John's  bones 
were  burnt  in  Sebasta.  Torches 
are  carried,  because  St.  John  was 
a  shining  light.  A  wheel  is  rolled, 
because  of  the  solstice,  which  is 
made  appropriate  to  St.  John  by  St. 
John  iii.  30.  The  account  of  Bele- 
thus is  amplified  by  Durandus,  Ra- 
tionale Div.  Offic.  (ed.  corr.  Antwerp, 
1614)  vii.  14,  and  taken  in  turn  from 
Durandus  by  a  fifteenth-century 
monk  of  Winchelscombe  in  a  ser- 
mon preserved  in  Harl.  MS.  2345, 
f.  49  (b). 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  127 

evidence,  for  rain-charms1.  It  is  perhaps  justifiable  to  infer 
that  the  crystallization  of  the  rain-  and  heat-charms,  which 
doubtless  were  originally  used  only  when  the  actual  condition 
of  the  weather  made  them  necessary,  into  annual  festivals, 
took  place  after  the  exact  rationale  of  them  had  been  lost, 
and  they  had  both  come  to  be  looked  upon,  rather  vaguely, 
as  weather-charms. 

Apart  from  the  festival-fires,  a  superstitious  use  of  sun- 
charms  endured  in  England  to  an  extraordinarily  late  date.  This 
was  in  times  of  drought  and  pestilence  as  a  magical  remedy 
against  mortality  amongst  the  cattle.  A  fire  was  built,  and, 
as  on  the  festivals,  the  cattle  were  made  to  pass  through  the 
smoke  and  flames2.  On  such  occasions,  and  often  at  the 
festival-fires  themselves,  it  was  held  requisite  that,  just  as 
the  water  used  in  the  rain-charms  would  be  fresh- water  from 
the  spring,  so  the  fire  must  be  fresh  fire.  That  is  to  say, 
it  must  not  be  lit  from  any  pre-existing  fire,  but  must  be 
made  anew.  And,  so  conservative  is  cult,  this  must  be  done, 
not  with  the  modern  device  of  matches,  or  even  with  flint 
and  steel,  but  by  the  primitive  method  of  causing  friction  in 
dry  work.  Such  fire  is  known  as  '  need-fire '  or  '  forced  fire,' 
and  is  produced  in  various  ways,  by  rubbing  two  pieces  of 
wood  together,  by  turning  a  drill  in  a  solid  block,  or  by  rapidly 
rotating  a  wheel  upon  an  axle.  Often  certain  precautions  are 
observed,  as  that  nine  men  must  work  at  the  job,  or  chaste 
boys ;  and  often  all  the  hearth-fires  in  the  village  are  first 
extinguished,  to  be  rekindled  by  the  new  flame3. 

The  custom  of  rolling  a  burning  wheel  downhill  from  the 

1  Gaidoz,  24,  109  ;  Bertrand,  122  ;  fetter.  It  is  variously  derived  from 
Dyer,  323;  Stubbes,  i.  339,  from  ndt  'need,'  ninwan  'rub,'  or  hnio- 
Naogeorgos;  Usener,  ii.  81;  and  the  tan  'press.'  If  the  last  is  right, 
mediaeval  calendar  in  Brand,  i.  179.  the  English  form   should  perhaps 

2  Gomme,mBn't.Ass.J?ep.(iSg6),  be  knead-fire  (Grimm,  ii.  607,  609  ; 
636  (Moray,  Mull) ;  F.  L.  ix.  280  Golther,  570).  Another  German 
(Caithness,  with  illustration  of  wood  term  is  Wildfeuer.  The  Gaelic 
used);  Kemble,  i.  360  (Perthshire  tin-egin  is  from  tin  '  fire,'  and  egin 
in  1826,  Devonshire).  'violence'  (Grimm,    ii.   609).     For 

3  Grimm,  ii.  603 ;  Kemble,  i.  ecclesiastical  prohibitions  cf.  Indi- 
359;  Elton,  293;  Frazer,  iii.  301;  cuius  (Saupe,  20)  '  de  igne  fricato 
Gaidoz,  22;  Jahn,  26;  Simpson,  de  Ijgno,  i.  e.  nodfyr ' ;  Capit.Karl- 
196;  Bertrand,  107;  Golther,  570.  manni  (742),  c.  5  (Grimm,  ii.  604) 
The  English  term  is  needjire,  '  illos  sacrilegos  ignes  quos  niedfyr 
Scotch    neid/yre,    German    Noth-  vocant.' 


128 


FOLK  DRAMA 


festival-fire  amongst  the  vineyards  has  been  noted.  The 
wheel  is,  of  course,  by  no  means  an  uncommon  solar  emblem  *. 
Sometimes  round  bannocks  or  hard-boiled  eggs  are  similarly 
rolled  downhill.  The  use  of  both  of  these  may  be  sacrificial 
in  its  nature.  But  the  egg  plays  such  a  large  part  in  festival 
customs,  especially  at  Easter,  when  it  is  reddened,  or  gilt,  or 
coloured  yellow  with  furze  or  broom  flowers,  and  popularly 
regarded  as  a  symbol  of  the  Resurrection,  that  one  is  tempted 
to  ask  whether  it  does  not  stand  for  the  sun  itself2.  And 
are  we  to  find  the  sun  in  the  '  parish  top  V  or  m  the  ball  with 
which,  even  in  cathedrals,  ceremonial  games  were  played  4  ? 


1  Gaidoz,  I  ;  Bertrand,  109,  140; 
Simpson,  109,  240 ;  Rhys,  C.  H.  54. 
The  commonest  form  of  the  symbol 
is  the  swastika,  but  others  appear  to 
be  found  in  the  'hammer'  of  Thor, 
and  on  the  altars  and  statues  of 
a  Gaulish  deity  equated  in  the 
interpretatio  Romana  with  Jupiter. 
There  is  a  wheel  decoration  on  the 
barelle  or  cars  of  the  Gubbio  ceri 
(Bower,  4). 

2  Brand,  i.  97  ;  Dyer,  159  ;  Ditch- 
field,  78.  Eggs  are  used  cere- 
monially at  the  Scotch  Beltane  fires 
(Frazer,  iii.  261  ;  Simpson,  285). 
Strings  of  birds'  eggs  are  hung  on 
the  Lynn  May  garland  {F.  L.  x. 
443).  In  Dauphine  an  omelette  is 
made  when  the  sun  rises  on  St. 
John's  day  (Cortet,  217).  In  Ger- 
many children  are  sent  to  look  for 
the  Easter  eggs  in  the  nest  of  a 
hare,  a  very  divine  animal.  Among 
the  miscellaneous  Benedictions  in 
the  Sarum  Manual,  with  the  Ben. 
Seminis  and  the  Ben.  Pomorum  in 
die  Su  Iacobi  are  a  Ben.  Carnis 
Casei  Butyri  Ovorum  sive  Pastil- 
larum  in  Pascha  and  a  Ben.  Agni 
Paschalis,  Ovorum  et  Herbarum  in 
die  Paschae.  These  Benedictions 
are  little  more  than  graces.  The 
Durham  Accounts,  i.  71-174,  con- 
tain entries  of  fifteenth-  and  sixteenth- 
century  payments  'fratribus  et  soro- 
ribus  de  Wytton  pro  eorum  Egsilver 
erga  festum  pasche.' 

3  Tiv.  N.  i.  3.  42  '  He's  a  coward 
and  a  coystrill,that  will  not  drink  to 


my  niece  till  his  brains  turn  o'  the 
toe  like  a  parish-top.'  Steevens 
says  '  a  large  top  was  formerly  kept 
in  every  village,  to  be  whipt  in  frosty 
weather,  that  the  peasants  might  be 
kept  warm  by  exercise  and  out  of 
mischief  while  they  could  not  work.' 
This  is  evidently  a  '  fake  '  of  the 
'  Puck  of  commentators.'  Hone, 
E.D.B.  i.  199,  says  'According  to 
a  story  (whether  true  or  false),  in 
one  of  the  churches  of  Paris,  a  choir 
boy  used  to  whip  a  top  marked 
with  Alleluia,  written  in  gold  letters, 
from  one  end  of  the  choir  to  the 
other.'  The  '  burial  of  Alleluia '  is 
shown  later  on  to  be  a  mediaeval 
perversion  of  an  agricultural  rite. 
On  the  whole  question  of  tops,  see 
Haddon,  255  ;  A.  B.  Gomme,  s.  v. 
4  Leber,  ix.  391  ;  Barthelemy,  iv. 
447  ;  Du  Tilliot,  30  ;  Grenier,  385  ; 
Be'renger-Fe'raud,  iii. 427;  Belethus, 
c.  120  '  Sunt  nonnullae  ecclesiae 
in  quibus  usitatum  est,  ut  vel  etiam 
episcopi  et  archiepiscopi  in  coenobiis 
cum  •  suis  ludant  subditis,  ita  ut 
etiam  se  ad  lusum  /pilae  demit- 
tant.  atque  haec  quidem  libertas 
ideo  dicta  est  decembrica. . . .  quam- 
quam  vero  magnae  ecclesiae,  ut 
est  Remensis,  hanc  ludendi  con- 
suetudinem  qbservent,  videtur  ta- 
men  laudabilius  esse  non  ludere  ' ; 
Durandus,  vi.  86  '  In  quibusdam 
locis  hac  die,  in  aliis  in  Natali, 
praelati  cum  suis  clericis  ludunt, 
vel  in  claustris,  vel  in  domibus  epi- 
scopalibus ;  ita  ut  etiam  descendant 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS 


129 


If  so,  perhaps  this  game  of  ball  may  be  connected  with  the 
curious  belief  that  if  you  get  up  early  enough  on  Easter 
morning  you  may  see  the  sun  dance x. 

In  any  case  sun-charms,  quite  independent  of  the  fires,  may 
probably  be  traced  in  the  circular  movements  which  so  often 
appear  invested  with  a  religious  significance,  and  which  some- 
times form  part  of  the  festivals  2.  It  would  be  rash  to  regard 
such  movements  as  the  basis  of  every  circular  dance  or  ronde 
on  such  an  occasion  ;  a  ring  is  too  obviously  the  form  which 
a  crowd  of  spectators  round  any  object,  sacred  or  otherwise, 
must  take.  But  there  are  many  circumambulatory  rites  in 
which  stress  is  laid  on  the  necessity  for  the  motion  to  be 
deasil,  or  with  the  right  hand  to  the  centre,  in  accordance 
with  the  course  of  the  sun,  and  not  in  the  opposite  direction, 
cartnaitheail  or  wither shinsz.  And  these,  perhaps,  may  be 
legitimately  considered  as  of  magical  origin. 


ad  ludum  pilae,  vel  etiam  ad  choreas 
et  cantus,  &c.'  Often  the  ball  play 
was  outside  the  church,  but  the  ca- 
nons of  Evreux  on  their  return  from 
the  procession  noire  of  May  I ,  played 
'  ad  quillas  super  voltas  ecclesiae  ' ; 
and  the  Easter  pilota  of  Auxerre 
which  lasted  to  1538,  took  place 
in  the  nave  before  vespers.  Full 
accounts  of  this  ceremony  have 
been  preserved.  The  dean  and 
canons  danced  and  tossed  the  ball, 
singing  the  Victimaepu  rchali.  For 
examples  of  Easter  hand-ball  or 
marbles  in  English  folk-custom,  cf. 
Brand,  i.  103 ;  Vaux,  240  ;  F.  L, 
xii.  75  ;  Mrs.  Gomme,  s.  v.  Hand- 
ball. 

1  Brand,  i.  93  ;  Burne- Jackson, 
335.  A  Norfolk  version  (F.  L.  vii. 
90)  has  '  dances  as  if  in  agony.' 
On  the  Mendips  (F.  L.  v.  339)  what 
is  expected  is  '  a  lamb  in  the  sun.' 
The  moon,  and  perhaps  the  sun  also, 
is  sometimes  'wobbly,'  'jumping' 
or  '  skipping,'  owing  to  the  presence 
of  strata  of  air  differing  in  humidity 
or  temperature,  and  so  changing 
the  index  of  refraction  (Nicholson, 
Golspie,  186).  At  Pontesford  Hill 
in  Shropshire  (Burne-Jackson,  330) 
the  pilgrimage  was  on  Palm  Sunday, 
actually  to  pluck  a  sprig  from  a 


haunted  yew,  traditionally  '  to  look 
for  the  golden  arrow,'  which  must 
be  solar.  In  the  Isle  of  Man  hills, 
on  which  are  sacred  wells,  are 
visited  on  the  Lugnassad,  to  gather 
ling-berries.  Others  say  that  it 
is  because  of  Jephthah's  daughter, 
who  went  up  and  down  on  the 
mountains  and  bewailed  her  vir- 
ginity. And  the  old  folk  now  stop 
at  home  and  read  Judges  xi  (Rhys, 
C.  F.  i.  312).  On  the  place  of  hill- 
tops in  agricultural  religion  cf.  p. 
106,  and  for  the  use  of  elevated  spots 
for  sun-worship  at  Rome,  ch.  xi. 

2  Simpson,  passim  ;  cf.  F.  L.  vi. 
168;  xi.  220.  Deasil  is  from  Gaelic 
deas,  'right,'  'south.'  Mediaeval 
ecclesiastical  processions  went 
'  contra  solis  cursum  et  morem  eccle- 
siasticum '  only  in  seasons  of  woe 
or  sadness  (Rock,  iii.  2.  182). 

3  Dr.  Murray  kindly  informs  me 
that  the  etymology  of  ivithershins 
(A.-S.  wipersynes)  is  uncertain.  It 
is  from  wiper,  '  against,'  and  either 
some  lost  noun,  or  one  derived  from 
se"on,  '  to  see,'  or  sitip,  '  course.' 
The  original  sense  is  simply  '  back- 
wards,' and  the  equivalence  with  dea- 
sil not  earlier  than  the  seventeenth 
century.  A  folk-etymology  from 
shine  may  account  for  the  aspirate. 


CHAMBERS.     I 


K 


130  FOLK  DRAMA 

With  the  growth  of  animistic  or  spiritual  religion,  the  mental 
tendencies,  out  of  which  magical  practices  or  charms  arise, 
gradually  cease  to  be  operative  in  the  consciousness  of  the 
worshippers.  The  charms  themselves,  however,  are  preserved 
by  the  conservative  instinct  of  cult.  In  part  they  survive  as 
mere  bits  of  traditional  ritual,  for  which  no  particular  reason 
is  given  or  demanded  ;  in  part  also  they  become  material  for 
that  other  instinct,  itself  no  less  inveterate  in  the  human 
mind,  by  which  the  relics  of  the  past  are  constantly  in  process 
of  being  re-explained  and  brought  into  new  relations  with  the 
present.  The  sprinkling  with  holy  water,  for  instance,  which 
was  originally  of  the  nature  of  a  rain-charm,  comes  to  be 
regarded  as  a  rite  symbolical  of  spiritual  purification  and 
regeneration.  An  even  more  striking  example  of  such  trans- 
formation of  intention  is  to  be  found  in  the  practice,  hardly 
yet  referred  to  in  this  account  of  the  agricultural  festivals,  of 
sacrifice.  In  the  ordinary  acceptation  of  the  term,  sacrifice 
implies  not  merely  an  animistic,  but  an  anthropomorphic 
conception  of  the  object  of  cult.  The  offering  or  oblation 
with  which  man  approaches  his  god  is  an  extension  of  the 
gift  with  which,  as  suppliant,  he  approaches  his  fellow  men. 
But  the  oblational  aspect  of  sacrifice  is  not  the  only  one. 
In  his  remarkable  book  upon  The  Religion  of  the  Semites, 
Professor  Robertson  Smith  has  formulated  another,  which 
may  be  distinguished  as  '  sacramental.'  In  this  the  sacrifice 
is  regarded  as  the  renewal  of  a  special  tie  between  the  god 
and  his  worshippers,  analogous  to  the  blood-bond  which 
exists  amongst  those  worshippers  themselves.  The  victim 
is  not  an  offering  made  to  the  god  ;  on  the  contrary,  the 
god  himself  is,  or  is  present  in,  the  victim.  It  is  his  blood 
which  is  shed,  and  by  means  of  the  sacrificial  banquet  and 
its  subsidiary  rites,  his  personality  becomes,  as  it  were, 
incorporated  in  those  of  his  clansmen1.  It  is  not  necessary 
to  determine  here  the  general  priority  of  the  two  types  or 

1  Robertson   Smith,   Religion   of  distinguished  the 'alimentary '  sac- 

the    Semites,    196;    Jevons,    130;  rifice  of  food  and  other  things  made 

Frazer,  ii.  352;  Grant  Allen,  318;  to   the   dead.      This   rests   on   the 

Hartland,   ii.  236 ;    Turnbull,    The  belief  in   the  continuance    of    the 

Blood    Covenant.     Perhaps,    as    a  mortal  life  with  its  needs  and  desires 

third  type  of  sacrifice,  should   be  after  death. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  131 

conceptions  of  sacrifice  described.  But,  while  it  is  probable 
that  the  Kelts  and  Teutons  of  the  time  of  the  conversion 
consciously  looked  upon  sacrifice  as  an  oblation,  there  is  also 
reason  to  believe  that,  at  an  earlier  period,  the  notion  of 
a  sacrament  had  been  the  predominant  one.  For  the 
sacrificial  ritual  of  these  peoples,  and  especially  that  used 
in  the  agricultural  cult,  so  far  as  it  can  be  traced,  is  only 
explicable  as  an  elaborate  process  of  just  that  physical 
incorporation  of  the  deity  in  the  worshippers  and  their 
belongings,  which  it  was  the  precise  object  of  the  sacramental 
sacrifice  to  bring  about.  It  will  be  clear  that  sacrifice,  so 
regarded,  enters  precisely  into  that  category  of  ideas  which 
has  been  defined  as  magical.  It  is  but  one  more  example 
of  that  belief  in  the  efficacy  of  direct  contact  which  lies  at 
the  root  of  sympathetic  magic.  As  in  the  case  of  the  garland 
customs,  this  belief,  originally  pre-animistic,  has  endured  into 
an  animistic  stage  of  thought.  Through  the  garland  and  the 
posies  the  worshipper  sought  contact  with  the  fertilization 
spirit  in  its  phytomorphic  form  ;  through  sacrifice  he 
approaches  it  in  its  theriomorphic  form  also.  The  earliest 
sacrificial  animals,  then,  were  themselves  regarded  as  divine, 
and  were  naturally  enough  the  food  animals  of  the  folk.  The 
use  made  by  the  Kelto-Teutonic  peoples  of  oxen,  sheep,  goats, 
swine,  deer,  geese,  and  fowls  requires  no  explanation.  A 
common  victim  was  also  the  horse,  which  the  Germans  seem, 
up  to  a  late  date,  to  have  kept  in  droves  and  used  for  food. 
The  strong  opposition  of  the  Church  to  the  sacrificial  use  of 
horse-flesh  may  possibly  account  for  the  prejudice  against 
it  as  a  food-stuff  in  modern  Europe1.  A  similar  prejudice, 
however,  in  the  case  of  the  hare,  an  animal  of  great  impor- 
tance in  folk  belief,  already  existed  in  the  time  of  Caesar2. 
It  is  a  little  more  puzzling  to  find  distinct  traces  of  sacrificial 

1  Grimm,   i.   47;    Golther,  565;  Stubbs,  iii.  458)  'equos  etiam  ple- 

Gummere,c7. 0.40,457.  Gregorylll  rique  invobis  comedunt,  quodnullus 

wrote  (+73 1 )  to  Boniface  (P.  Z.lxxxix.  Christianorum  in  Orientalibus  facit.' 

577)  '  inter  cetera  agrestem  cabal-  The  decking  of  horses  is  a  familiar 

luin      aliquantos     comedere      ad-  feature  of  May-day  in  London  and 

iunxisti    plerosque  et  domesticum.  elsewhere. 

hoc  nequaquam  fieri  deinceps    si-  2  C.  J.  Billson,  The  Easter  Hare, 

nas,'  cf.  Councils  of  Cealcythe  and  in  F.  L.  iii.  441. 
Pincanhale  (787),  c.  19  (Haddan- 

K  2 


132  FOLK  DRAMA 

customs  in  connexion  with  animals,  such  as  the  dog,  cat,  wolf, 
fox,  squirrel,  owl,  wren,  and  so  forth,  which  are  not  now 
food  animals *.  But  they  may  once  have  been  such,  or  the 
explanation  may  lie  in  an  extension  of  the  sacrificial  practice 
after  the  first  rationale  of  it  was  lost. 

At  every  agricultural  festival,  then,  animal  sacrifice  may  be 
assumed  as  an  element.  The  analogy  of  the  relation  between 
the  fertilization  spirit  and  his  worshippers  to  the  human  blood 
bond  makes  it  probable  that  originally  the  rite  was  always 
a  bloody  one  2.  Some  of  the  blood  was  poured  on  the  sacred 
tree.  Some  was  sprinkled  upon  the  worshippers,  or  smeared 
over  their  faces,  or  solemnly  drunk  by  them  3.  Hides,  horns, 
and  entrails  were  also  hung  upon  the  tree4,  or  worn  as  festival 
trappings  5.  The  flesh  was,  of  course,  solemnly  eaten  in  the 
sacrificial  meal 6.  The  crops,  as  well  as  their  cultivators,  must 
benefit  by  the  rites  ;  and  therefore  the  fields,  and  doubtless 
also  the  cattle,  had  their  sprinkling  of  blood,  while  heads  or 
pieces  of  flesh  were  buried  in  the  furrows,  or  at  the  threshold 
of  the  byre 7.  A  fair  notion  of  the  whole  proceeding  may  be 
obtained  from  the  account  of  the  similar  Indian  worship  of 
the  earth-goddess  given  in  Appendix  I.  The  intention  of  the 
ceremonies  will  be  obvious  by  a  comparison  with  those 
already  explained.  The  wearing  of  the  skins  of  the  victims 
is  precisely  parallel  to  the  wearing  of  the  green  vegetation, 
the  sprinkling  with  blood  to  the  sprinkling  with  lustral  water, 
the  burial  in  the  fields  of  flesh  and  skulls  to  the  burial  of 


1  N.W.  Thomas  in  F.  L.  xi.  227.  phic  larva  or  mask  (Frazer,  Pau- 

2  Grimm,   i.    55  ;    Golther,    559,  sanias,  iv.  239). 

575;    Gummere,   G.  O.  456.     The  6  Grimm,  i.  46,  57  ;  Golther,  576; 

universal  Teutonic  term  for  sacri-  Frazer,  ii.  31S,  353;  Jevons,  144; 

ficing  is  blotan.  Grant  Allen,  325.     Savages  believe 

3  Frazer, Pausam'as,i'ri. 20;  Jevons,  that  by  eating  an  animal  they  will 
130,191.  Does  the  modern  hunts-  acquire  its  bodily  and  mental 
man     know    why    he    'bloods'    a  qualities. 

novice  ?  7  Jahn,  14,  and  for  classical  pa- 

*  Grimm,  i.  47,  57,77;  Jahn,  24  ;  rallels  Frazer,  ii.  315  ;  Pausanias, 

Gummere,  G.  O.  459.     Hence  the  iii.    288 ;    Jevons,    Plutarch,    lxix. 

theriomorphic  '  image.'  143.     Grant  Allen,  292,  was  told  as 

0  Robertson    Smith,    414,    448;  a  boy  in  Normandy  that  at  certain 

Jevons,   102,  285;   Frazer,  ii.  448;  lustrations  'a  portion  of  the  Host 

Lang,  M.  R.  R}  ii.  73,  80,  106,  214,  (stolen  or  concealed,  I  imagine)  was 

226  ;  Grant  Allen,  335  ;  Du  Meril,  sometimes  buried  in  each  field.' 

Com.  i.  75.     Hence  the  theriomor- 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  133 

brands  from  the  festival-fire.  In  each  case  the  belief  in  the 
necessity  of  direct  physical  contact  to  convey  the  beneficent 
influence  is  at  the  bottom  of  the  practice.  It  need  hardly  be 
said  that  of  such  physical  contact  the  most  complete  example 
is  in  the  sacramental  banquet  itself. 

It  is  entirely  consistent  with  the  view  here  taken  of  the 
primitive  nature  of  sacrifice,  that  the  fertilization  spirit  was 
sacrificed  at  the  village  festivals  in  its  vegetable  as  well  as  in 
its  animal  form.  There  were  bread-offerings  as  well  as  meat- 
offerings1. Sacramental  cakes  were  prepared  with  curious 
rituals  which  attest  their  primitive  character.  Like  the 
tcharnican  or  Beltane  cakes,  they  were  kneaded  and  moulded 
by  hand  and  not  upon  a  board  2 ;  like  the  loaf  in  the  Anglo- 
Saxon  charm,  they  were  compounded  of  all  sorts  of  grain 
in  order  that  they  might  be  representative  of  every  crop  in 
the  field  3.  At  the  harvest  they  would  naturally  be  made, 
wholly  or  in  part,  of  the  last  sheaf  cut.  The  use  of  them 
corresponded  closely  to  that  made  of  the  flesh  of  the  sacrificial 
victim.  Some  were  laid  on  a  branch  of  the  sacred  tree4; 
others  flung  into  the  sacred  well  or  the  festival-fire ;  others 
again  buried  in  the  furrows,  or  crumbled  up  and  mingled  with 
the  seed-corn5.  And  like  the  flesh  they  were  solemnly  eaten 
by  the  worshippers  themselves  at  the  sacrificial  banquet. 
With  the  sacrificial  cake  went  the  sacrificial  draught,  also 
made  out  of  the  fruits  of  the  earth,  in  the  southern  lands  wine, 
but  in  the  vineless  north  ale,  or  cider,  or  that  mead  which 
Pytheas  described  the  Britons  as  brewing  out  of  honey  and 
wheat 6.  Of  this,  too,  the  trees  and  crops  received  their  share, 
while  it  filled  the  cup  for  those  toasts  or  minnes  to  the  dead  and 
to  Odin  and  Freyja  their  rulers,  which  were  afterwards  trans- 
ferred by  Christian  Germany  to  St.  John  and  St.  Gertrude7. 

The  animal  and  the  cereal  sacrifices  seem  plausible  enough, 
but  they  do  not  exhaust  the  problem.  One  has  to  face  the 
fact  that   human   sacrifice,  as  Victor   Hehn  puts   it,  'peers 

1  Frazer,    ii.  318;  Grant  Allen,     2)  a  bit  of  the  bannock  is  reserved 
337  5  Jevons,  206.  for  the   '  cuack  '   or  cuckoo,   here 

2  F.L.  vi.  1.  doubtless  the  inheritor  of  the  gods. 

3  Frazer,  ii.  319;  Jevons,  214;         5  Grimm,  iii.  1240. 
cf.  the  ndva-Tiepfw.  at  the  Athenian  6  Elton,  428. 

Pyanepsia.  7  Grimm,  i.  59;  Gummere,  G.  O. 

4  In  the  Beltane  rite  (F.  L.  vi.     455. 


134  FOLK  DRAMA 

uncannily  forth  from  the  dark  past  of  every  Aryan  race1. 
So  far  as  the  Kelts  and  Teutons  go,  there  is  plenty  of  evidence 
to  show,  that  up  to  the  very  moment  of  their  contact  with 
Roman  civilization,  in  some  branches  even  up  to  the  very 
moment  of  their  conversion  to  Christianity,  it  was  not  yet 
obsolete 2.  An  explanation  of  it  is  therefore  required,  which 
shall  fall  in  with  the  general  theory  of  agricultural  sacrifice. 
The  subject  is  very  difficult,  but,  on  the  whole,  it  seems 
probable  that  originally  the  slaying  of  a  human  being  at  an 
annually  recurring  festival  was  not  of  the  nature  of  sacrifice 
at  all.  It  is  doubtful  whether  it  was  ever  sacrifice  in  the 
sacramental  sense,  and  although  in  time  it  came  to  be  regarded 
as  an  oblation,  this  was  not  until  the  first  meaning,  both  of 
the  sacrifice  and  of  the  human  death,  had  been  lost.  The 
essential  .facts  bearing  on  the  question  have  been  gathered 
together  by  Dr.  Frazer  in  The  Golden  Bough.  He  brings 
out  the  point  that  the  victim  in  a  human  sacrifice  was  not 
originally  merely  a  man,  but  a  very  important  man,  none 
other  than  the  king,  the  priest-king  of  the  tribe.  In  many 
communities,  Aryan-speaking  and  other,  it  has  been  the 
principal  function  of  such  a  priest-king  to  die,  annually  or 
at  longer  intervals,  for  the  people.  His  place  is  taken,  as 
a  rule,  by  the  tribesman  who  has  slain  him  3.  Dr.  Frazer's 
own  explanation  of  this  custom  is,  that  the  head  of  the  tribe 
was  looked  upon  as  possessed  of  great  magical  powers,  as 
a  big  medicine  man,  and  was  in  fact  identified  with  the  god 
himself.  And  his  periodical  death,  says  Dr.  Frazer,  was 
necessary,  in  order  to  renew  the  vitality  of  the  god,  who 
might  decay  and  cease  to  exist,  were  he  not  from  time  to 
time  reincarnated  by  being  slain  and  passing  into  the  body 
of  his  slayer  and  successor4.      This   is   a   highly  ingenious 

1  V.  Hehn,  Culturpflanzen,  438.  norum,  daemonibus  obtulerit'  ;  Lex 

2  Grimm,  i.  44,  48,  53  ;  Golther,  Frisionu7n}  additio  sup.  tit.  42  '  qui 
561 ;  Gummere,CV.  O. 45 9;  Schrader,  fanum  effregerit  .  .  .  immolatur  diis, 
422;  Mogk,  iii.  388;  Meyer,  199,  quorum  templa  violavit '  ;  Epist. 
and  for  Keltic  evidence  Elton,  270.  Greg.  Ill,  1  (P.  L.  lxxxix,  578)  '  hoc 
Many  of  these  examples  belong  quoque  inter  alia  crimina  agi  in 
rather  to  the  war  than  to  the  agri-  partibus  illis  dixisti,  quod  quidam  ex 
cultural  cult.  The  latest  in  the  fidelibus  ad  immolandum  paganis 
west  are  Capit.  de  pariib.  Saxon.  9  sua  venundent  mancipia.' 

'  Si  quis  hominem  diabolo  sacrifi-  3  Frazer,  ii.  1  ;  Jevons,  279. 

caverit  et  in  hostiam,  more  paga-         4  Frazer,  ii.  5,  59. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  135 

and  fascinating  theory,  but  unfortunately  there  are  several 
difficulties  in  the  way  of  accepting  it.  In  the  first  place  it 
is  inconsistent  with  the  explanation  of  the  sacramental 
killing  of  the  god  arrived  at  by,  Professor  Robertson  Smith. 
According  to  this  the  sacrifice  of  the  god  is  for  the  sake 
of  his  worshippers,  that  the  blood-bond  with  them  may  be 
renewed ;  and  we  have  seen  that  this  view  fits  in  admirably 
with  the  minor  sacrificial  rites,  such  as  the  eating  and  bury- 
ing of  the  flesh,  as  the  wearing  of  the  horns  and  hides. 
Dr.  Frazer,  however,  obliges  us  to  hold  that  the  god  is  also 
sacrificed  for  his  own  sake,  and  leaves  us  in  the  position  of 
propounding  two  quite  distinct  and  independent  reasons  for 
the  same  fact.  Secondly,  there  is  no  evidence,  at  least 
amongst  Aryan-speaking  peoples,  for  that  breaking  down 
of  the  very  real  and  obvious  distinction  between  the  god  and 
his  chief  worshipper  or  priest,  which  Dr.  Frazer's  theory 
implies.  And  thirdly,  if  the  human  victim  were  slain  as 
being  the  god,  surely  this  slaughter  should  have  replaced 
the  slaughter  of  the  animal  victim  previously  slain  for  the 
same  reason,  which  it  did  not,  and  should  have  been  followed 
by  a  sacramental  meal  of  a  cannibal  type,  of  which  also,  in 
western  Europe,  there  is  but  the  slightest  trace  \ 

Probably,  therefore,  the  alternative  explanation  of  Dr. 
Frazer's  own  facts  given  by  Dr.  Jevons  is  preferable.  Ac- 
cording to  this  the  death  of  the  human  victim  arises  out  of 
the  circumstances  of  the  animal  sacrifice.  The  slaying  of  the 
divine  animal  is  an  act  approached  by  the  tribe  with  mingled 
feelings.  It  is  necessary,  in  order  to  renew  the  all-essential 
blood-bond  between  the  god  and  his  worshippers.  And  at 
the  same  time  it  is  an  act  of  sacrilege ;  it  is  killing  the  god. 
There  is  some  hesitation  amongst  the  assembled  worshippers. 
Who  will  dare  the  deed  and  face  its  consequences  ?  '  The 
clansman,'  says  Dr.  Jevons,  'whose  religious  conviction  of 
the  clan's  need  of  communion  with  the  god  was  deepest, 
would  eventually  and  after  long  waiting  be  the  one  to 
strike,  and    take    upon   himself  the   issue,   for   the   sake   of 

1  Strabo,  iv.  5.  4  ;  Bastian,  Oestl.      not  necessarily  represent  a  primitive 
Asien,  v.  272.     The  Mexican  evi-     notion  of  the  nature  of  the  rite, 
dence  given  by  Frazer,  iii.  134,  does 


136  FOLK  DRAMA 

his  fellow  men.'  This  issue  would  be  twofold.  The  slayer 
would  be  exalted  in  the  eyes  of  his  fellows.  He  would 
naturally  be  the  first  to  drink  the  shed  blood  of  the  god. 
A  double  portion  of  the  divine  spirit  would  enter  into  him. 
He  would  become,  for  a  while,  the  leader,  the  priest-king,  of 
the  community.  At  the  same  time  he  would  incur  blood- 
guiltiness.  And  in  a  year's  time,  when  his  sanctity  was 
exhausted,  the  penalty  would  have  to  be  paid.  His  death 
would  accompany  the  renewal  of  the  bond  by  a  fresh  sacrifice, 
implying  in  its  turn  the  self-devotion  of  a  fresh  annual  king 1. 

These  theories  belong  to  a  region  of  somewhat  shadowy 
conjecture.  If  Dr.  Jevons  is  right,  it  would  seem  to  follow 
that,  as  has  already  been  suggested,  the  human  death  at  an 
annual  festival  was  not  initially  sacrifice.  It  accompanied, 
but  did  not  replace  the  sacramental  slaughter  of  a  divine 
animal.  But  when  the  animal  sacrifice  had  itself  changed 
its  character,  and  was  looked  upon,  no  longer  as  an  act  of 
communion'  with  the  god,  but  as  an  offering  or  bribe  made 
to  him,  then  a  new  conception  of  the  human  death  also  was 
required.  When  the  animal  ceased  to  be  recognized  as  the 
god,  the  need  of  a  punishment  for  slaying  it  disappeared. 
But  the  human  death  could  not  be  left  meaningless,  and  its 
meaning  was  assimilated  to  that  of  the  animal  sacrifice  itself. 
It  also  became  an  oblation,  the  greatest  that  could  be  offered 
by  the  tribe  to  its  protector  and  its  judge.  And  no  doubt 
this  was  the  conscious  view  taken  of  the  matter  by  Kelts  and 
Teutons  at  the  time  when  they  appear  in  history.  The  human 
sacrifice  was  on  the  same  footing  as  the  animal  sacrifice,  but  it 
was  a  more  binding,  a  more  potent,  a  more  solemn  appeal. 

In  whatever  way  human  sacrifice  originated,  it  was  ob- 
viously destined,  with  the  advance  of  civilization,  to  undergo 
modification.  Not  only  would  the  growing  moral  sense  of 
mankind  learn  to  hold  it  a  dark  and  terrible  thing,  but  also 
to  go  on  killing  the  leading  man  of  the  tribe,  the  king-priest, 
would  have  its  obvious  practical  inconveniences.  At  first, 
indeed,  these  would  not  be  great.     The  king-priest  would  be 

1  Jevons,  291  ;  Plutarch,  Ixx.  at  Athens  and  the  regifugium  at 
For  traces  of  the  blood-guiltiness  Rome  (Frazer,  ii.  294 ;  Robertson 
incurred  by  sacrifice,  cf.  the  frovfyovia     Smith,  i.  286). 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  137 

little  more  than  a  rain-maker,  a  rex  sacrorum,  and  one 
man  might  perform  the  ceremonial  observances  as  well  as 
another.  But  as  time  went  on,  and  the  tribe  settled  down 
to  a  comparatively  civilized  life,  the  serious  functions  of  its 
leader  would  increase.  He  would  become  the  arbiter  of 
justice,  the  adviser  in  debate ;  above  all,  when  war  grew 
into  importance,  the  captain  in  battle.  And  to  spare  and 
replace,  year  by  year,  the  wisest  councillor  and  the  bravest 
warrior  would  grow  into  an  intolerable  burden.  Under  some 
such  circumstances,  one  can  hardly  doubt,  a  process  of  sub- 
stitution set  in.  Somebody  had  to  die  for  the  king.  At  first, 
perhaps,  the  substitute  was  an  inferior  member  of  the  king's 
own  house,  or  even  an  ordinary  tribesman,  chosen  by  lot. 
But  the  process,  once  begun,  was  sure  to  continue,  and 
presently  it  was  sufficient  if  a  life  of  little  value,  that  of 
a  prisoner,  a  slave,  a  criminal,  a  stranger  within  the  gates, 
was  sacrificed  \  The  common  belief  in  madness  or  imbecility 
as  a  sign  of  divine  possession  may  perhaps  have  contributed 
to  make  the  village  fool  or  natural  seem  a  particularly  suit- 
able victim.  But  to  the  very  end  of  Teutonic  and  Keltic 
heathenism,  the  sense  that  the  substitute  was,  after  all,  only 
a  substitute  can  be  traced.  In  times  of  great  stress  or 
danger,  indeed,  the  king  might  still  be  called  upon  to  suffer 
in  person2.  And  always  a  certain  pretence  that  the  victim 
was  the  king  was  kept  up.  Even  though  a  slave  or  criminal, 
he  was  for  a  few  days  preceding  the  sacrifice  treated  royally. 
He  was  a  temporary  king,  was  richly  dressed  and  feasted, 
had  a  crown  set  on  his  head,  and  was  permitted  to  hold  revel 
with  his  fellows.  The  farce  was  played  out  in  the  sight  of 
men  and  gods3.  Ultimately,  of  course,  the  natural  growth 
of  the  sanctity  of  human  life  in  a  progressive  people,  or  in 
an  unprogressive  people  the  pressure  of  outside  ideals 4, 
forbids  the  sacrifice  of  a  man  at  all.     Perhaps  the  temporary 

1  Frazer,  ii.  15,  55,  232  ;  Jevons,      Grant  Allen,  296. 

280 ;  Grant  Allen,  242,  296,  329.  4  The  British  rule  in  India  for- 

2  In  three  successive  years  of  bids  human  sacrifice,  and  the 
famine  the  Swedes  sacrificed  first  Khonds,  a  Dravidian  race  of  Ben- 
oxen,  then  men,  finally  their  king  gal,  have  substituted  animal  for 
Domaldi  himself  ( Ynglingasaga,  human  victims  within  the  memory 
c.  18).  of  man  (Frazer,  ii.  245). 

3  Frazer,    ii.   24 ;    Jevons,    280 ; 


138  FOLK  DRAMA 

king  is  still  chosen,  and  even  some  symbolic  mimicked  slaying 
of  him  takes  place ;  but  actually  he  does  not  die.  An  animal 
takes  his  place  upon  the  altar ;  or  more  strictly  speaking,  an 
animal  remains  the  last  victim,  as  it  had  been  the  first,  and  in 
myth  is  regarded  as  a  substitute  for  the  human  victim  which 
for  a  time  had  shared  its  fate.  Of  such  a  myth  the  legends 
of  Abraham  and  Isaac  and  of  Iphigeneia  at  Aulis  are  the 
classical  examples. 

There  is  another  group  of  myths  for  which,  although  they 
lack  this  element  of  a  substituted  victim,  mythologists  find  an 
origin  in  a  reformation  of  religious  sentiment  leading  to  the 
abolition  of  human  sacrifice.  The  classical  legend  of  Perseus 
and  Andromeda,  the  hagiological  legend  of  St.  George  and 
the  Dragon,  the  Teutonic  legend  of  Beowulf  and  Grendel, 
are  only  types  of  innumerable  tales  in  which  the  hero  puts 
an  end  to  the  periodical  death  of  a  victim  by  slaying  the 
monster  who  has  enforced  and  profited  by  it 1.  What  is 
such  a  story  but  the  imaginative  statement  of  the  fact  that 
such  sacrifices  at  one  time  were,  and  are  not  ?  It  is,  how- 
ever, noticeable,  that  in  the  majority  of  these  stories,  although 
not  in  all,  the  dragon  or  monster  slain  has  his  dwelling  in 
water,  and  this  leads  to  the  consideration  of  yet  another 
sophistication  of  the  primitive  notion  of  sacrifice.  According 
to  this  notion  sacrifice  was  necessarily  bloody ;  in  the  shed- 
ding of  blood  and  in  the  sacrament  of  blood  partaken  of  by 
the  worshippers,  lay  the  whole  gist  of  the  rite :  a  bloodless 
sacrifice  would  have  no  raison  d'etre.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  myths  just  referred  to  seem  to  imply  a  bloodless  sacrifice 
by  drowning,  and  this  notion  is  confirmed  by  an  occasional 
bit  of  ritual,  and  by  the  common  superstition  which  repre- 
sents the  spirits  of  certain  lakes  and  rivers  as  claiming 
a  periodical  victim  in  the  shape  of  a  drowned  person 2. 
Similarly  there  are  traces  of  sacrifices,  which  must  have  been 
equally  bloodless,  by  fire.  At  the  Beltane  festival,  for 
instance,  one  member   of  the  party  is  chosen  by  lot  to  be 

1  Hartland,  iii.  i  ;  Frazer,  Pau-  2  Hartland,  iii.  81  ;  Grimm,  ii. 
sanias,  iv.  197;  v.  44,  143;  Beren-  494;  Gummere,  G.  O.  396.  The 
ger-Feraud,  i.  207.  Mr.  Frazer  enu-  slaves  of  Nerthus  were  drowned  in 
merates  forty-one  versions  of  the  the  same  lake  in  which  the  god- 
legend,  dess  was  dipped. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  139 

the  '  victim,'  is  made  to  jump  over  the  flames  and  is  spoken 
of  in  jest  as  '  dead  V  Various  Roman  writers,  who  apparently 
draw  from  the  second-century  B.C.  Greek  explorer  Posido- 
nius,  ascribe  to  the  Druids  of  Gaul  a  custom  of  burning 
human  and  other  victims  at  quinquennial  feasts  in  colossal 
images  of  hollow  wickerwork  ;  and  squirrels,  cats,  snakes  and 
other  creatures  are  frequently  burnt  in  modern  festival-fires  2. 
The  constant  practice,  indeed,  of  burning  bones  in  such  fires 
has  given  them  the  specific  name  of  bonfires,  and  it  may  be 
taken  for  granted  that  the  bones  are  only  representatives  of 
more  complete  victims.  I  would  suggest  that  such  sacrifices 
by  water  and  fire  are  really  developments  of  the  water-  and 
fire-charms  described  in  the  last  chapter ;  and  that  just  as 
the  original  notion  of  sacrifice  has  been  extended  to  give  a 
new  significance  to  the  death  of  a  human  being  at  a  religious 
festival,  when  the  real  reason  for  that  death  had  been  for- 
gotten, so  it  has  been  still  further  extended  to  cover  the 
primitive  water-  and  fire-charms  when  they  too  had  become 
meaningless.  I  mean  that  at  a  festival  the  victims,  like  the 
image  and  the  worshippers,  were  doubtless  habitually  flung 
into  water  or  passed  through  fire  as  part  of  the  charm  ;  and 
that,  at  a  time  when  sacrifice  had  grown  into  mere  oblation 
and  the  shedding  of  blood  was  therefore  no  longer  essential, 
these  rites  were  adapted  and  given  new  life  as  alternative 
methods  of  effecting  the  sacrifice. 

It  is  not  surprising  that  there  should  be  but  few  direct  and 
evident  survivals  of  sacrifice  in  English  village  custom.  For 
at  the  time  of  the  conversion  the  rite  must  have  borne  the 
whole  brunt  of  the  missionary  attack.  The  other  elements  of 
the  festivals,  the  sacred  garlands,  the  water-  and  fire- charms, 
had  already  lost  much  of  their  original  significance.  A  judge- 
ment predisposed  to  toleration  might   plausibly  look   upon 

1  F.  L.  vi.  I.  festival-fires.     But  elsewhere,  as  in 

2  Frazer,  iii.  319;  Gaidoz,  27;  the  midsummershows,  such  'giants' 
Cortet,  213;  Simpson,  221;  Ber-  seem  to  be  images  of  the  agri- 
trand,  68;  F.  L.  xii.  315.  The  cultural  divinities,  and  it  is  not  clear 
work  of  Posidonius  does  not  exist,  by  what  process  they  came  to  be 
but  was  possibly  used  by  Caesar,  burnt  and  so  destroyed.  Perhaps 
B.  G.  vi.  15;  Strabo,  iv.  4.  5;  they  were  originally  only  smoked, 
Diodorus,  v.  32.     Wicker  'giants'  just  as  they  were  dipped. 

are    still   burnt    in    some    French 


140  FOLK  DRAMA 

them  as  custom  rather  than  worship.  It  was  not  so  with 
sacrifice.  This  too  had  had  its  history,  and  in  divers  ways 
changed  its  character.  But  it  was  still  essentially  a  liturgy. 
Oblation  or  sacrament,  it  could  not  possibly  be  dissociated 
from  a  recognition  of  the  divine  nature  of  the  power  in  whose 
honour  it  took  place.  And  therefore  it  must  necessarily  be 
renounced,  as  a  condition  of  acceptance  in  the  Church  at  all, 
by  the  most  weak-kneed  convert.  What  happened  was 
precisely  that  to  which  Gregory  the  Great  looked  forward. 
The  sacrificial  banquet,  the  great  chines  of  flesh,  and  the 
beakers  of  ale,  cider,  and  mead,  endured,  but  the  central 
rite  of  the  old  festival,  the  ceremonial  slaying  of  the  animal, 
vanished.  The  exceptions,  however,  are  not  so  rare  as  might 
at  first  sight  be  thought,  and  naturally  they  are  of  singular 
interest.  It  has  already  been  pointed  out  that  in  times  of 
stress  and  trouble,  the  thinly  veneered  heathenism  of  the 
country  folk  long  tended  to  break  out,  and  in  particular  that 
up  to  a  very  late  date  the  primitive  need-fire  was  occa- 
sionally revived  to  meet  the  exigencies  of  a  cattle-plague. 
Under  precisely  similar  circumstances,  and  sometimes  in 
immediate  connexion  with  the  need-fire,  cattle  have  been 
known,  even  during  the  present  century,  to  be  sacrificed  l. 
Nor  are  such  sporadic  instances  the  only  ones  that  can  be 
adduced.  Here  and  there  sacrifice,  in  a  more  or  less  modi- 
fied form,  remains  an  incident  in  the  village  festival.  The 
alleged  custom  of  annually  sacrificing  a  sheep  on  May-day  at 
Andreas  in  the  Isle  of  Man  rests  on  slight  evidence 2 ;  but 
there  is  a  fairly  well  authenticated  example  in  the  '  ram 
feast'  formerly  held  on  the  same  day  in  the  village  of 
Holne  in  Devonshire.  A  ram  was  slain  at  a  granite  pillar 
or  ancient  altar  in  the  village  '  ploy-field,'  and  a  struggle 
took  place  for  slices  which  were  supposed  to  bring  luck  3. 

1  Gomme,  Ethnology,  137  ;  F.L.  s  1  N.  Q,  vii.  353  ;  Gomme,  Eth- 
ii.  300;  x.  101 ;  xii.  217;  Vaux,  nology,  32;  Village  Community, 
287;  Rhys,  C.  F.  i.  306.  113  ;  Grant  Allen,  290.   The  custom 

2  F.  L.  ii.  302  ;  Rhys,  C.  F.  i.  307.  was  extinct  when  it  was  first  de- 
In  1656,  bulls  were  sacrificed  near  scribed  in  1853,  and  some  doubt 
Dingwall  (F.  L.  x.  353).  A  few  has  recently  been  thrown  upon  the 
additional  examples,  beyond  those  '  altar,'  the  '  struggle '  and  other 
here  given,  are  mentioned  by  N.  W.  details  ;  cf.  Trans,  of  Devonshire 
Thomas,  in  F.  L.  xi.  247.  Assn.  xxviii.  99  ;  F.  L.  viii.  287. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  141 

Still  more  degenerate  survivals  are  afforded  by  the  Whitsun 
feast  at  King's  Teignton,  also  in  Devonshire  \  and  by  the 
Whitsun  '  lamb  feast '  at  Kidlington 2,  the  Trinity  '  lamb 
ale'  at  Kirtlington 3,  and  the  'Whit  hunt'  in  Wychwood 
Forest 4,  all  three  places  lying  close  together  in  Oxfordshire. 
These  five  cases  have  been  carefully  recorded  and  studied  ; 
but  they  do  not  stand  alone ;  for  the  folk-calendar  affords 
numerous  examples  of  days  which  are  marked,  either  univer- 
sally or  locally,  by  the  ceremonial  hunting  or  killing  of  some 
wild  or  domestic  animal,  or  by  the  consumption  of  a  parti- 
cular dish  which  readily  betrays  its  sacrificial  origin 6.  The 
appearance  of  animals  in  ecclesiastical  processions  in  St. 
Paul's  cathedral6  and  at  Bury  St.  Edmunds7  is  especially 
significant ;  and  it  is  natural  to  find  an  origin  for  the  old 
English  sport  of  bull-baiting  rather  in  a  survival  of  heathen 
ritual  than  in  any  reminiscence  of  the  Roman  amphitheatre 8. 
Even  where  sacrifice  itself  has  vanished,  the  minor  rites 
which  once  accompanied  it  are  still  perpetuated  in  the  super- 
stitions or  the  festival  customs  of  the  peasantry.  The  heads 
and  hides  of  horses  or  cattle,  like  the  exuviae  of  the  sacrificial 
victims,  are  worn  or  carried  in  dance,  procession  or  quite  9.  The 
dead  bodies  of  animals  are  suspended  by  shepherds  or  game- 
keepers upon  tree  and  barn-door,  from  immemorial  habit  or  from 

1  xN.Q.vn.  353;  Gomme,  Einno-  Sparrow  Simpson,  St.  Paul's  Cath. 
logy,  30  5  Vaux,  285.  and  Old  City  Life,  234). 

2  Blount,  Jocular  Tenures  (ed.  7  F.  L.  iv.  9;  x.  355.  White 
Beckwith),  281  ;  Dyer,  297.  bulls  are  said  to  have  been  led  to 

3  Dunkin, //z>/.  of Bicester  (1816),  the  shrine  by  women  desirous  of 
268;  P.  Manning,  in  F.  L.  viii.  313.  children.     F.  C.  Conybeare,  in  R. 

4  P.  Manning,  in  F.  L.  viii.  310;  de  V Hist,  des  Religions,  xliv.  108, 
Dyer,  282.  describes   some   survivals    of  sac- 

5  N.W.Thomas,  in  F.  L.  xi.  227  ;  rificial  rites  in  the  Armenian  church 
Dyer,  285,  438,  470  ;  Ditchfield,  which  existed  primitively  in  other 
85,  131.  Greek  churches  also. 

6  Certain  lands  were  held  of  the  8  F.  L.  vii.  346.  Bull-baiting 
chapter  for  which  a  fat  buck  was  often  took  place  on  festivals,  and 
paid  on  the  Conversion  of  St.  Paul  in  several  cases,  as  at  Tutbury,  the 
(January  25),  and  a  fat  doe  on  bull  was  driven  into  or  over  a  river, 
the  Commemoration  of  St.  Paul  Bear-baiting  is  possibly  a  later 
(June  30).     They  were  offered,  ac-  variant  of  the  sport. 

cording  to  one  writer,  alive,  at  the  9  Burton,  165  ;  Suffolk  F.  L.  71 ; 

high  altar;  the  flesh  was  baked,  the  Ditchfield,  227  ;  Dyer,  387  ;  Pfan- 

head  and   horns   carried    in  festal  nenschmidt,  279 ;    cf.   the   Abbots 

procession.      The    custom    dated  Bromley  Horn-dance  (ch.  viii). 
from  at  least  1274  (Dyer,  49 ;  W. 


142  FOLK  DRAMA 

some  vague  suspicion  of  the  luck  they  will  bring.  Although 
inquiry  will  perhaps  elicit  the  fallacious  explanation  that 
they  are  there  pour  enconrager  les  autres x.  In  the  following 
chapters  an  attempt  will  be  made  to  show  how  widely 
sacrifice  is  represented  in  popular  amusements  and  ludi.  Here 
it  will  be  sufficient  to  call  attention  to  two  personages  who 
figure  largely  in  innumerable  village  festivals.  One  is  the 
'  hobby-horse,'  not  yet,  though  Shakespeare  will  have  it  so, 
1  forgot 2 '  :  the  other  the  '  fool '  or  '  squire,'  a  buffoon  with 
a  pendent  cow's  tail,  who  is  in  many  places  de  rigueur  in 
Maying  or  rushbearing  3.  Both  of  these  grotesques  seem  to 
be  at  bottom  nothing  but  worshippers  careering  in  the  skins 
of  sacrificed  animals. 

The  cereal  or  liquor  sacrifice  is  of  less  importance.  Sugar 
and  water,  which  may  be  conjectured  to  represent  mead,  is 
occasionally  drunk  beside  a  sacred  well,  and  in  one  instance, 
at  least,  bread  and  cheese  are  thrown  into  the  depths.  Some- 
times also  a  ploughman  carries  bread  and  cheese  in  his  pocket 
when  he  goes  abroad  to  cut  the  first  furrow4.  But  the  original 
rite  is  probably  most  nearly  preserved  in  the  custom  of 
'youling'  fruit-trees  to  secure  a  good  crop.  When  this  is 
done,  at  Christmas  or  Ascension-tide,  ale  or  cider  is  poured 
on  the  roots  of  the  trees,  and  a  cake  placed  in  a  fork  of  the 
boughs.  Here  and  there  a  cake  is  also  hung  on  the  horn  of 
an  ox  in  the  stall5.    Doubtless  the  'feasten'  cake,  of  traditional 

1  F.  L.  iv.  5.  The  custom  of  'fool 'or  'squire'  in  the  sword  and 
sacrifice  at  the  foundation  of  a  new  morris  dances,  and  ch.  xvi  on  his 
building  has  also  left  traces  :  cf.  court  and  literary  congener.  The 
Grant  Allen,  248 ;  F.  L.  xi.  322,  folk-fool  wears  a  cow's  tail  or  fox's 
437  ;  Speth,  Builders'  Rites  and  brush,  or  carries  a  stick  with  a  tail 
Ceremonies.  at  one  end  and  a  bladder  and  peas 

2  Douce,  598,  gives  a  cut  of  a  at  the  other.  He  often  wears 
hobby-horse,  i.e.  a  man  riding  a  a  mask  or  has  his  face  blacked, 
pasteboard  or  wicker  horse  with  In  Lancashire  he  is  sometimes 
his  legs  concealed  beneath  a  foot-  merged  with  the 'woman' grotesque 
cloth.  According  to  Du  Meril,  of  the  folk-festivals,  and  called 
Com.  i.  79,  421,  the  device  is  known  'owd  Bet.' 

throughout  Europe.    In  France  it  is  4  W.  Gregor,  F.  L.of  N.  E.  Scot- 

the  chevalet,  cheval-mallet,  cheval-  /and, 181,  says  that  bread  and  cheese 

fol,  &c.  ;    in  Germany  the  Schim-  were  actually  laid  in  the  field,  and 

mel.  in  the  plough  when  it  was  '  strykit.' 

8  Dyer,    182,    266,   271;    Ditch-  5  Dyer,  20,  207,447;  Ditchfield, 

field,  97 ;   Burton,  40 ;   F.  L.  viii.  46 ;    F.   L.   vi.    93.      Pirminius  v. 

3°9>  3l3>  317;    cf.  ch.  ix  on   the  Reichenau,    Dicta{i  753),    c.    22, 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  143 

shape  and  composition,  which  pervades  the  country,  is  in  its 
origin  sacramental  \  Commonly  enough,  it  represents  an 
animal  or  human  being,  and  in  such  cases  it  may  be  held, 
while  retaining  its  own  character  of  a  cereal  sacrifice,  to  be 
also  a  substitute  for  the  animal  or  human  sacrifice  with  which 
it  should  by  rights  be  associated  2. 

An  unauthenticated  and  somewhat  incredible  story  has 
been  brought  from  Italy  to  the  effect  that  the  moun- 
taineers of  the  Abruzzi  are  still  in  the  habit  of  offering 
up  a  human  sacrifice  in  Holy  week 3.  In  these  islands  a 
reminiscence  of  the  observance  is  preserved  in  the  'victim' 
of  the  Beltane  festival4,  and  a  transformation  of  it  in  the 
whipping  of  lads  when  the  bounds  are  beaten  in  the  Roga- 
tions 5.  Some  others,  less  obvious,  will  be  suggested  in  the 
sequel.  In  any  case  one  ceremony  which,  as  has  been  seen, 
grew  out  of  human  sacrifice,  has  proved  remarkably  enduring. 
This  is  the  election  of  the  temporary  king.  Originally  chosen 
out  of  the  lowest  of  the  people  for  death,  and  feted  as  the 
equivalent  or  double  of  the  real  king-priest  of  the  community, 
he  has  survived  the  tragic  event  which  gave  him  birth,  and 
plays  a  great  part  as  the  master  of  the  ceremonies  in  many 
a  village  revel.  The  English  '  May-king,'  or  '  summer-king,' 
or  '  harvest-lord  V  or  '  mock-mayor  V  is  a  very  familiar 
personage,   and    can    be   even    more   abundantly   paralleled 

forbids  'effundere    super    truncum  sometimes  includes  burying  them, 

frugem  et  vinum.'  closely   resembles    the    symbolical 

1  F.  L.  Congress,  449,  gives  a  list  sacrifices  of  the  harvest  field  (p. 
of  about  fifty  'feasten'  cakes.  158).  Grant  Allen,  270,  suggests 
Some  are  quite  local ;  others,  from  that  the  tears  shed  are  a  rain- 
the    Shrove   Tuesday    pancake   to  charm.     I  hope  he  is  joking. 

the  Good   Friday   hot   cross   bun,  6  Brand,  ii.  13  ;  Suffolk  F.  L.  69, 

widespread.  71;  Leicester  F.  L.  121.     A  'har- 

2  Grimm,  i.  57  ;  Frazer,  ii.  344  ;  vest-lord  '  is  probably  meant  by  the 
Grant  Allen,  339;  Jevons,  215;  'Rex  Autumnalis'  mentioned  in 
Dyer,  165  ;  Ditchfield,  81.  the  Accounts  of  St.  Michael's,  Bath 

3  F.  L.  vi.  57  ;  viii.  354 ;  ix.  (ed.  Somerset  Arch.  Soc.  88),  in 
362;  x.  in.  1487,   1490,  and   1492.      A  corona 

*  F.  L.  vi.  1.  was  hired  by  him  from  the  parish. 

5  Ditchfield,  116,    227  ;    Suffolk  Often  the  reaper  who  cuts  the  last 

F.   L.    108  ;    Dyer,    Old   English  sheaf  (i.e.   slays  the  divinity)  be- 

Social  Life,    197.      The   boys    are  comes  harvest-lord. 

now  said  to  be  whipped  in  order  7  Gomme,    Village    Community, 

that  they  may  remember  the  boun-  107  ;    Dyer,    339  ;    Northall,    202  ; 

daries ;     but    the    custom,    which  Gloucester  F.  L.  33. 


144  FOLK  DRAMA 

from  continental  festivals1.  To  the  May-king  in  particular 
we  shall  return.  But  in  concluding  this  chapter  it  is  worth 
while  to  point  out  and  account  for  two  variants  of  the  custom 
under  consideration.  In  many  cases,  probably  in  the  majority 
of  cases  so  far  as  the  English  May-day  is  concerned,  the  king 
is  not  a  king,  but  a  queen.  Often,  indeed,  the  part  is  played 
by  a  lad  in  woman's  clothes,  but  this  seems  only  to  emphasize 
the  fact  that  the  temporary  ruler  is  traditionally  regarded  as 
a  female  one2.  It  is  probable  that  we  have  here  no  modern 
development,  but  a  primitive  element  in  the  agricultural 
worship.  Tacitus  records  the  presence  amongst  the  Germans 
of  a  male  priest  '  adorned  as  women  use 3,'  while  the  exchange 
of  garments  by  the  sexes  is  included  amongst  festival  abuses 
in  the  ecclesiastical  discipline-books4.  Occasionally,  more- 
over, the  agricultural  festivals,  like  those  of  the  Bona  Dea  at 
Rome,  are  strictly  feminine  functions,  from  which  all  men  are 
excluded  5.  Naturally  I  regard  these  facts  as  supporting  my 
view  of  the  origin  of  the  agricultural  worship  in  a  women's 
cult,  upon  which  the  pastoral  cult  of  the  men  was  afterwards 
engrafted.  And  finally,  there  are  cases  in  which  not  a  king 
alone  nor  a  queen  alone  is  found,  but  a  king  and  a  queen  6. 
This  also  would  be  a  reasonable  outcome  of  the  merging  of 
the  two  cults.  Some  districts  know  the  May-queen  as  the 
May-bride,  and  it  is  possible  that  a  symbolical  wedding  of 
a  priest  and  priestess  may  have  been  one  of  the  regular  rites 
of  the  summer  festivals.  For  this  there  seem  to  be  some 
parallels  in  Greek  and  Roman  custom,  while  the  myth  which 

1  Frazer,  i.  216;  E.  Pabst,  Die  in  habitu  muliebri  et  mulier  in 
Volksfeste  des  Maigrafen  (1865).  habitu   viri    emendatione    pollicita 

2  Frazer,  i.  219;  Cortet,  160;  tres  annos  poeniteat.'  The  ex- 
Brand,  i.  126  ;  Dyer,  266  ;  Ditch-  change  of  head-gear  between  men 
field,  98.  and    women    remains    a    familiar 

3  Tacitus,  Germ.  c.  43  '  apud  feature  of  the  modern  bank- 
Nahanarvalos  antiquae  religionis  holiday.  Some  Greek  parallels  are 
lucus  ostenditur.  praesidet  sacer-  collected  by  Frazer,  Pausanias,  iii. 
dos  muliebri  ornatu.'  197.     E.  Crawley,  The  Mystic  Rose 

4  Cone,  of  Trullo  (692),  c.  62  (1902),  viii.  371,  suggests  another 
(Mansi,xi.67i)'Nullus  vir  deinceps  explanation,  which  would  connect 
muliebri  veste  induatur,  vel  mulier  the  custom  with  the  amorous  side 
veste  viro  conveniente ' ;    Cone,  of  of  the  primitive  festivals. 

Braga   (of   doubtful    date),    c.   80  6  Frazer,  ii.  93,  109. 

(Mansi,  ix.  844) '  Si  quis  ballationes  e  Ibid.    i.   220;     Brand,   i.   t$7  ; 

ante  ecclesias  sanctorum  fecerit,  seu  Dyer,  217;   Ditchfield,  97;   Kelly, 

quis   faciem  suam  transformaverit  62  :  cf.  ch.  viii. 


VILLAGE  FESTIVALS  145 

represents  the  heaven  as  the  fertilizing  husband  of  the  fruitful 
earth  is  of  hoar  antiquity  amongst  the  Aryan-speaking  peoples. 
The .  forces  which  make  for  the  fertility  of  the  fields  were 
certainly  identified  in  worship  with  those  which  make  for 
human  fertility.  The  waters  of  the  sacred  well  or  the  blaze 
of  the  festival  fire  help  the  growth  of  the  crops ;  they  also 
help  women  in  their  desire  for  a  lover  and  for  motherhood. 
And  it  may  be  taken  for  granted  that  the  summer  festivals 
knew  from  the  beginning  that  element  of  sexual  licence  which 
fourteen  centuries  of  Christianity  have  not  wholly  been  able 
to  banish  K 

1  Pearson,  ii.  24,  407.    Cf.  the  evidence  for  a  primitive  human  pairing- 
season  in  Westermarck,  25. 


CHAMBERS.     I 


CHAPTER   VII 
FESTIVAL  PLAY 

[Bibliographical  Note. — A  systematic  revision  of  J.  Strutt,  The  Sports 
and  Pastimes  of  the  People  of  England  (1801,  ed.  W.  Hone,  1830),  is,  as 
in  the  case  of  Brand's  book,  much  needed.  On  the  psychology  of  play 
should  be  consulted  K.  Groos,  Die  Spiele  der  Thiere  (1896,  transl.  1898), 
and  Die  Spiele  der  Menschen  (1899,  transl.  1901).  Various  anthropo- 
logical aspects  of  play  are  discussed  by  A.  C.  Haddon,  The  Study  of 
Man  (1898),  and  the  elaborate  dictionary  of  The  Traditional  Games  of 
England,  Scotland  and  Ireland  by  Mrs.  A.  B.  Gomme  (1894-8)  may 
be  supplemented  from  W.  W.  Newell,  Games  and  Songs  oj  American 
Children  (1884),  H.  C.  Bolton,  The  Counting-Out  Rhymes  of  Children 
(1888),  E.  W.  B.  Nicholson,  Golspie  (1897),  and  R.  C.  Maclagan,  The 
Games  and  Diversions  of  Argyleshire  (F.L.S.  1901).  The  charivari 
is  treated  by  C.  R.  B.  Barrett,  Riding  Skimmington  and  Riding  the  Stang 
in  the  Journal  of  the  British  Archaeological  Association,  N.  S.  i.  58,  and 
C.  Noirot,  L'Origine  des  Masques  (1609),  reprinted  with  illustrative  matter 
by  C.  Leber,  Dissertations  relatives  a  PHistoire  de  France,  vol.  ix.  The 
account  of  the  Coventry  Hox  Tuesday  Play  given  in  Robert  Laneham's 
Letter  (1575)  will  be  found  in  Appendix  H.] 

The  charms,  the  prayer,  the  sacrifice,  make  up  that  side 
of  the  agricultural  festival  which  may  properly  be  regarded 
as  cult :  they  do  not  make  up  the  whole  of  it.  It  is 
natural  to  ask  whether,  side  by  side  with  the  observances  of 
a  natural  religion,  there  were  any  of  a  more  spiritual  type ; 
whether  the  village  gods  of  our  Keltic  and  Teutonic  ancestors 
were  approached  on  festival  occasions  solely  as  the  givers 
of  the  good  things  of  earth,  or  whether  there  was  also  any 
recognition  of  the  higher  character  which  in  time  they  came 
to  have  as  the  guardians  of  morality,  such  as  we  can  trace 
alike  in  the  ritual  of  Eleusis  and  in  the  tribal  mysteries  of 
some  existing  savage  peoples.  It  is  not  improbable  that 
this  was  so ;  but  it  may  be  doubted  whether  there  is  much 
available  evidence  on  the  matter,  and,  in  any  case,  it  cannot 
be  gone  into  here1.     There  is,  however,  a  third  element  of 

1  Purity  of  life  is  sometimes  required  of  those  who  are  to  kindle  the 
new  fire  (Frazer,  iii.  260,  302). 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  147 

the  village  festival  which  does  demand  consideration,  and 
that  is  the  element  of  play.  The  day  of  sacrifice  was  also 
a  day  of  cessation  from  the  ordinary  toil  of  the  fields,  a 
holiday  as  well  as  a  holy  day.  Sacred  and  secular  met  in 
the  amorous  encounters  smiled  upon  by  the  liberal  wood- 
goddess,  and  in  the  sacramental  banquet  with  its  collops  of 
flesh  and  spilth  of  ale  and  mead.  But  the  experience  of  any 
bank  holiday  will  show  that,  for  those  who  labour,  the 
suspension  of  their  ordinary  avocations  does  not  mean  quies- 
cence. When  the  blood  is  heated  with  love  and  liquor,  the 
nervous  energies  habitually  devoted  to  wielding  the  goad 
and  guiding  the  plough  must  find  vent  in  new  and  for  the 
nonce  unprofitable  activities.  But  such  activities,  self-suffi- 
cing, and  primarily  at  least  serving  no  end  beyond  them- 
selves, are,  from  pushpin  to  poetry,  exactly  what  is  meant 
by  play1. 

The  instinct  of  play  found  a  foothold  at  the  village  feast 
in  the  debris  which  ritual,  in  its  gradual  transformation,  left 
behind.  It  has  already  been  noted  as  a  constant  feature  in 
the  history  of  institutions  that  a  survival  does  not  always 
remain  merely  a  survival ;  it  may  be  its  destiny,  when  it  is 
emptied  of  its  first  significance,  to  be  taken  up  into  a  different 
order  of  ideas,  and  to  receive  a  new  lease  of  vitality  under 
a  fresh  interpretation.  Sacrifice  ceases  to  be  sacrament  and 
becomes  oblation.  Dipping  and  smoking  customs,  originally 
magical,  grow  to  be  regarded  as  modes  of  sacrificial  death. 
Other  such  waifs  of  the  past  become  the  inheritance  of 
play.  As  the  old  conception  of  sacrifice  passed  into  the 
new  one,  the  subsidiary  rites,  through  which  the  sacramental 
influence  had  of  old  been  distributed  over  the  worshippers 
and  their  fields,  although  by  no  means  disused,  lost  their 
primitive  meaning.  Similarly,  when  human  sacrifice  was 
abolished,  that  too  left  traces  of  itself,  only  imperfectly  in- 
telligible, in  mock  or  symbolical  deaths,  or  in  the  election 
of  the  temporary  king.  Thus,  even  before  Christianity  anti- 
quated the  whole  structure  of  the  village  festivals,  there  were 
individual  practices  kept  alive  only  by  the  conservatism  of 

1  H.  Spencer,  Principles  of  Psychology,  ii.  629  ;    K.  Groos,  Play  of 
Man,  361  ;  Hirn,  25. 

l  a 


148  FOLK  DRAMA 

tradition,  and  available  as  material  for  the  play  instinct. 
These  find  room  in  the  festivals  side  by  side  with  other 
customs  which  the  same  instinct  not  only  preserved  but 
initiated.  Of  course,  the  antithesis  between  play  and  cult 
must  not  be  pushed  too  far.  The  peasant  mind  is  tenacious  of 
acts  and  forgetful  of  explanations ;  and  the  chapters  to  come 
will  afford  examples  of  practices  which,  though  they  began 
in  play,  came  in  time  to  have  a  serious  significance  of  quasi- 
ritual,  and  to  share  in  the  popular  imagination  the  prestige 
as  fertility  charms  of  the  older  ceremonies  of  worship  with 
which  they  were  associated.  The  ludi  to  be  immediately 
discussed,  however,  present  themselves  in  the  main  as  sheer 
play.  Several  of  them  have  broken  loose  from  the  festivals 
altogether,  or,  if  they  still  acknowledge  their  origin  by  making 
a  special  appearance  on  some  fixed  day,  are  also  at  the 
service  of  ordinary  amusement,  whenever  the  leisure  or  the 
whim  of  youth  may  so  suggest. 

To  begin  with,  it  is  possible  that  athletic  sports  and  horse- 
racing  are  largely  an  outcome  of  sacrificial  festivals.  Like 
the  Greeks  around  the  pyre  of  Patroclus,  the  Teutons  cele- 
brated games  at  the  tombs  of  their  dead  chieftains1.  But 
games  were  a  feature  of  seasonal,  no  less  than  funeral  feasts. 
It  will  be  remembered  that  the  council  of  Clovesho  took  pains 
to  forbid  the  keeping  of  the  Rogation  days  with  horse-races. 
A  bit  of  wrestling  or  a  bout  of  quarter-staff  is  still  de  rigueur 
at  many  a  wake  or  rushbearing,  while  in  parts  of  Germany 
the  winner  of  a  race  or  of  a  shooting-match  at  the  popinjay  is 
entitled  to  light  the  festival  fire,  or  to  hold  the  desired  office  of 
May-king  2.  The  reforming  bishops  of  the  thirteenth  century 
include  public  wrestling-bouts  and  contests  for  prizes  amongst 
the  ludi  whose  performance  they  condemn  ;  and  they  lay 
particular  stress  upon  a  custom  described  as  arietum  super 
ligna  et  rotas  elevationes.  The  object  of  these  '  ram-raisings ' 
seems  to  be  explained  by  the  fact  that  in  the  days  of  Chaucer 
a  ram  was  the  traditional  reward  proposed  for  a  successful 
wrestler3;  and  this  perhaps  enables  us  to  push  the  connexion 

1  Gummere,  G.  O.  331.  (C.  T.  prol.  548) : 

2  Frazer,  i.  217  ;  iii.  258.  'At  wrastlynge  he  wolde  have 

3  Chaucer    says    of    the    Miller  alwey  the  ram ' ; 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  149 

with  the  sacrificial  rite  a  little  further.  I  would  suggest  that 
the  original  object  of  the  man  who  wrestled  for  a  ram,  or 
climbed  a  greasy  pole  for  a  leg  of  mutton,  or  shot  for  a  popin- 
jay, was  to  win  a  sacrificial  victim  or  a  capital  portion  thereof, 
which  buried  in  his  field  might  bring  him  abundant  crops. 
The  orderly  competition  doubtless  evolved  itself  from  such  an 
indiscriminate  scrimmage  for  the  fertilizing  fragments  as  marks 
the  rites  of  the  earth-goddess  in  the  Indian  village  feast  K 
Tug-of-war  would  seem  to  be  capable  of  a  similar  explana- 
tion, though  here  the  desired  object  is  not  a  portion  of  the 
victim,  but  rather  a  straw  rope  made  out  of  the  corn  divinity 
itself  in  the  form  of  the  harvest- May2.  An  even  closer 
analogy  with  the  Indian  rite  is  afforded  by  such  games  as 
hockey  and  football.  The  ball  is  nothing  else  than  the  head 
of  the  sacrificial  beast,  and  it  is  the  endeavour  of  each  player 
to  get  it  into  his  own  possession,  or,  if  sides  are  taken,  to  get 
it  over  a  particular  boundary3.  Originally,  of  course,  this 
was  the  player's  own  boundary ;  it  has  come  to  be  regarded 
as  that  of  his  opponents  ;  but  this  inversion  of  the  point  of 
view  is  not  one  on  which  much  stress  can  be  laid.  In  proof 
of  this  theory  it  may  be  pointed  out  that  in  many  places 
football  is  still  played,  traditionally,  on  certain  days  of  the 
year.  The  most  notable  example  is  perhaps  at  Dorking, 
where  the  annual  Shrove  Tuesday  scrimmage  in  the  streets 

and  of  Sir  Thopas  (C.  T.  13670) :  games,  in  which  the  ball  is  fought 

'  Of  wrastlynge  was  ther  noon  his  for,  are  distinct  from  those  already 

peer,  mentioned  as  having  a  ceremonial 

Ther  any  ram  shal  stonde.'  use,  in  which  it  is  amicably  tossed 

Strutt,  82,  figures  a  wrestling  from  from  player  to  player  (cf.  p.  128). 

Royal  MS.  2,  B.  viii,  with  a  cock  If   Golf  belongs    to    the    present 

set  on  a  pole  as  the  prize.  category,  it  is  a  case  in  which  the 

1  Cf.  Appendix  I.,  and  Frazer,  ii.  endeavour  seems  to  be  actually  to 
316  ;  Jevons,  Plutarch,  lxix.  143,  on  bury  the  ball.  It  is  tempting  to 
the  struggle  between  two  wards —  compare  the  name  Hockey  with  the 
the  Sacred  Way  and  the  Subura —  Hock-cart  of  the  harvest  festival, 
for  the  head  of  the  October  Horse  and  with  Hock-tide ;  but  it  does  not 
at  Rome.  really   seem   to    be    anything   but 

2  Haddon,  270.  The  tug-of-war  Hookey.  The  original  of  both  the 
reappears  in  Korea  and  Japan  as  hockey-stick  and  the  golf-club  was 
a  ceremony  intended  to  secure  a  probably  the  shepherd's  crook, 
good  harvest.  Mr.  Pepys  tried  to  cast  stones  with 

3  Mrs.  Gomme,  s.  vv.  Bandy-  a  shepherd's  crook  on  those  very 
ball,  Camp,  Football,  Hockey,  Epsom  downs  where  the  stock- 
Hood,    Hurling,    Shinty.     These  broker  now  foozles  bis  tee  shot. 


150  FOLK  DRAMA 

of  the  town  and  the  annual  efforts  of  the  local  authorities  to 
suppress  it  furnish  their  regular  paragraph  to  the  newspapers. 
There  are  several  others,  in  most  of  which,  as  at  Dorking, 
the  contest  is  between  two  wards  or  districts  of  the  town  l. 
This  feature  is  repeated  in  the  Shrove  Tuesday  tug-of-war 
at  Ludlow,  and  in  annual  faction-fights  elsewhere 2.  It  is 
probably  due  to  that  o-woikkt/xo's  of  village  communities  by 
which  towns  often  came  into  being.  Here  and  there,  more- 
over, there  are  to  be  found  rude  forms  of  football  in  which 
the  primitive  character  of  the  proceeding  is  far  more  evident 
than  in  the  sophisticated  game.  Two  of  these  deserve  espe- 
cial mention.  At  Hallaton  in  Leicestershire  a  feast  is  held 
on  Easter  Monday  at  a  piece  of  high  ground  called  Hare-pie 
Bank:  A  hare — the  sacrificial  character  of  the  hare  has 
already  been  dwelt  upon — is  carried  in  procession.  '  Hare- 
pies  '  are  scrambled  for ;  and  then  follows  a  sport  known  as 
'  bottle-kicking.'  Hooped  wooden  field-bottles  are  thrown 
down  and  a  scrimmage  ensues  between  the  men  of  Hallaton 
and  the  men  of  the  adjoining  village  of  Medbourne.  Besides 
the  connexion  with  the  hare  sacrifice,  it  is  noticeable  that 
each  party  tries  to  drive  the  bottle  towards  its  own  boundary, 
and  not  that  of  its  opponents  3.  More  interesting  still  is  the 
Epiphany  struggle  for  the  '  Haxey  hood '  at  Haxey  in 
Lincolnshire.  The  '  hood  '  is  a  roll  of  sacking  or  leather,  and 
it  is  the  object  of  each  of  the  players  to  carry  it  to  a  public- 
house  in  his  own  village.  The  ceremony  is  connected  with 
the  Plough  Monday  quite,  and  the  '  plough-bullocks '  or 
'  boggons '  led  by  their  '  lord  duke '  and  their  '  fool,'  known 
as  '  Billy  Buck,'  are  the  presiding  officials.  On  the  following 
day  a   festival-fire  is   lit,  over  which  the  fool  is  '  smoked.' 

1  F.  L.   vii.  345  ;    M.  Shearman,  annual  Shrove  Tuesday  football  on 

Athletics  and  Football,  246  ;  Had-  the  Roodee  was  commuted  for  races 

don,    271;    Gomme,     Vill.    Comm.  in  1540  {Hist.  MSS.  viii.   1.  362). 

240;   Ditchfield,  57,  64;  W.   Fitz-  At  Dublin  there   was,   in   1569,  a 

Stephen,    Vita  S.  Thomae  (t  11 70-  Shrove    Tuesday   'riding'   of   the 

82)    in   Mat.  for   Hist,  of  Becket  '  occupacions' each 'bearing balles' 

(R.  S.),  iii.  9,  speaks  of  the  'lusum  (Gilbert,  ii.  54). 

pilae   celebrem  '   in    London   'die  2  Haddon,  loc.  cit. ;  Gomme,  loc. 

quae  dicitur  Carnilevaria.'     Riley,  cit. ;   Gloucester  F.  L.  38.     Cf.  the 

571,   has  a   London   proclamation  conflictus  described  in  ch.  ix,  and 

of    1409    forbidding    the    levy    of  the   classical   parallels    in    Frazer, 

money   for    'foteballe'    and    'cok-  Pausanias,  iii.  267. 

thresshyng.'       At      Chester      the  s  F.L.  iii.  441 ;  Ditchfield,  85. 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  151 

The  strongest  support  is  given  to  my  theory  of  the  origin 
of  this  type  of  game,  by  an  extraordinary  speech  which  the 
fool  delivers  from  the  steps  of  an  old  cross.  As  usual,  the 
cross  has  taken  the  place  of  a  more  primitive  tree  or  shrine. 
The  speech  runs  as  follows  :  '  Now,  good  folks,  this  is  Haxa' 
Hood.  We've  killed  two  bullocks  and  a  half,  but  the  other 
half  we  had  to  leave  running  field:  we  can  fetch  it  if  it's 
wanted.     Remember  it's 

1  Hoose  agin  hoose,  toon  agin  toon, 
And  if  you  meet  a  man,  knock  him  doon.' 

In  this  case  then,  the  popular  memory  has  actually  preserved 
the  tradition  that  the  '  hood'  or  ball  played  with  is  the  half  of 
a  bullock,  the  head  that  is  to  say,  of  the  victim  decapitated 
at  a  sacrifice  x. 

Hockey  and  football  and  tug-of-war  are  lusty  male  sports, 
but  the  sacrificial  survival  recurs  in  some  of  the  singing  games 
played  by  girls  and  children.  The  most  interesting  of  these 
is  that  known  as  '  Oranges  and  Lemons.'  An  arch  is  formed 
by  two  children  with  raised  hands,  and  under  this  the  rest 
of  the  players  pass.  Meanwhile  rhymes  are  sung  naming 
the  bells  of  various  parishes,  and  ending  with  some  such 
formula  as 

'  Here  comes  a  chopper  to  chop  off  your  head  : 
The  last,  last,  last,  last  man's  head.' 

As  the  last  word  is  sung,  the  hands  forming  the  arch  are 
lowered,  and  the  child  who  is  then  passing  is  caught,  and  falls 
in  behind  one  of  the  leaders.  When  all  in  turn  have  been 
so  caught,  a  tug-of-war,  only  without  a  rope,  follows.  The 
'  chopping '  obviously  suggests  a  sacrifice,  in  this  case  a  human 
sacrifice.  And  the  bell-rhymes  show  the  connexion  of  the 
game  with  the  parish  contests  just  described.  There  exists 
indeed  a  precisely  similar  set  of  verses  which  has  the  title, 
Song  of  the  Bells  of  Derby  on  Football  Morning.  The  set 
ordinarily  used    in   'Oranges   and    Lemons'   names   London 

1  F.  L.  vii.  330  (a  very  full  ac-  hood  on  a  windy  day,  and  instituted 

count);    viii.    72,   173;    Uitchfield,  the    contest    in     memory    of    the 

50.     There   is   a   local  aetiological  event, 
myth   about   a   lady  who  lost  her 


152  FOLK  DRAMA 

parishes,  but  here  is  a  Northamptonshire  variant,  which  is 
particularly  valuable  because  it  alludes  to  another  rite  of  the 
agricultural  festival,  the  sacramental  cake  buried  in  a  furrow : 

1  Pancakes  and  fritters, 
Says  the  bells  of  St.  Peter's : 
Where  must  we  fry  'em  ? 
Says  the  bells  of  Cold  Higham : 
In  yonder  land  thurrow  (furrow) 
Says  the  bells  of  Wellingborough,  &c. x 

Other  games  of  the  same  type  are  '  How  many  Miles  to 
Babylon,'  'Through  the  Needle  Eye,'  and  'Tower  of  London.' 
These  add  an  important  incident  to  'Oranges  and  Lemons,'  in 
that  a  '  king '  is  said  to  be  passing  through  the  arch.  On  the 
other  hand,  some  of  them  omit  the  tug-of-war2.  With  all 
these  singing  games  it  is  a  little  difficult  to  say  whether 
they  proceed  from  children's  imitations  of  the  more  serious 
proceedings  pf  their  elders,  or  whether  they  were  originally 
played  at  the  festivals  by  grown  men  and  maidens,  and  have 
gradually,  like  the  May  quite  itself,  fallen  into  the  children's 
hands.  The  '  Oranges  and  Lemons '  group  has  its  analogy  to 
the  tug-of-war;  the  use  of  the  arch  formation  also  connects 
it  with  the  festival  '  country '  dances  which  will  be  mentioned 
in  the  next  chapter. 

The  rude  punishments  by  which  the  far  from  rigid  code 
of  village  ethics  vindicates  itself  against  offenders,  are  on 
the  border  line  between  play  and  jurisprudence.  These  also 
appear  to  be  in  some  cases  survivals,  diverted  from  their 
proper  context,  of  festival  usage.  It  has  been  pointed  out 
that  the  ducking  which  was  a  form  of  rain-charm  came  to  be 
used  as  a  penalty  for  the  churlish  or  dispirited  person,  who 
declined  to  throw  up  his  work  or  to  wear  green  on  the  festival 
day.  In  other  places  this  same  person  has  to  '  ride  the  stang.' 
That  is  to  say,  he  is  set  astride  a  pole  and  borne  about  with 
contumely,  until  he  compounds  for  his  misdemeanour  by 
a  fine  in  coin  or  liquor 3.      '  Riding  the  stang,'  however,  is 

1  Mrs.  Gomme,  s.v.  Oranges  and  word,  of  Scandinavian  origin,  for 
Lemons.  'pole'  or  'stake.'     The  Scandina- 

2  Mrs.  Gomme,  s.  vv.  vian  nift-stong  (scorn-stake)  was  a 
*  Dyer,    6,   481.     'Stang'   is    a     horse's  head  on  a  pole,  with  a  written 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  153 

a  rural  punishment  of  somewhat  wide  application1.  It  is 
common  to  England  and  to  France,  where  it  can  be  traced 
back,  under  the  names  of  charivari  and  chevauche'e,  to  the 
fifteenth  century2.  The  French  sociith  joyeuses,  which  will 
be  described  in  a  later  chapter,  made  liberal  use  of  it 3.  The 
offences  to  which  it  is  appropriate  are  various.  A  miser,  a 
henpecked  husband  or  a  wife-beater,  especially  in  May,  and, 
on  the  other  hand,  a  shrew  or  an  unchaste  woman,  are  liable 
to  visitation,  as  are  the  parties  to  a  second  or  third  marriage, 
or  to  one  perilously  long  delayed,  or  one  linking  May  to 
December.  The  precise  ceremonial  varies  considerably. 
Sometimes  the  victim  has  to  ride  on  a  pole,  sometimes  on  a 
hobby-horse 4,  or  on  an  ass  with  his  face  turned  to  the  tail 5. 
Sometimes,  again,  he  does  not  appear  at  all,  but  is  repre- 
sented by  an  effigy  or  guy,  or,  in  France,  by  his  next-door 
neighbour6.  This  dramatic  version  is,  according  to  Mr.  Barrett, 
properly  called  a  'skimmington  riding,'  while  the  term 
'riding  the  stang'  is  reserved  for  that  in  which  the  offender 
figures  in  person.  The  din  of  kettles,  bones,  and  cleavers,  so 
frequent  an  element  in  rustic  ceremonies,  is  found  here  also, 

curse  and  a  likeness  of  the  man  to  et  manibus  sibilatione,  instrumento 

be  ill-wished  (Vigfusson,  Icel.  Diet,  aeruginariorum,  sive  fabricantium, 

s.v.  n$).  et    aliarum    rerum    sonorosarum, 

1  Cf.  with  Mr.  Barrett's  account,  vociferationibus  tumultuosis  et  aliis 

Northall,     253;     Ditchfield,    178;  ludibriis    et    irrisionibus,    in     illo 

Northern  F.  L.  29  ;   Julleville,  Les  damnabili    actu    (qui    cariuarium, 

Com.   205 ;    also  Thomas  Hardy's  vulgariter    charivari,  nuncupatur) 

Mayor  of  Casterbridge,  and  his  The  circa  domos  nubentium,  et  in  ipso- 

Fire  at  Tranter  Sweatley's  ( Wessex  rum  detestationem  et  opprobrium 

Poems,  201).     The  penalty  is  used  post  eorum  secundas  nuptias  fieri 

by  schoolboys  {Northern  F.  L.  29)  consuetum,  &c.' 

as  well  as  villagers.  s  Cf.  ch.  xvi,  and  Leber,  ix.  148, 

s  Grenier,    375;    Ducange,   s.v.  169;  Julleville,  Les  Com.  205,  243. 

Charivarium,  which  he  defines  as  In   1579  a  regular  jeu  was  made 

'  ludus  turpis  tinnitibus  et  clamori-  by  the  Dijon  Mlre-Folle  of  the  che- 

bus  variis,  quibus  illudunt  iis,  qui  ad  vauchie  of  one  M.  Du  Tillet.    The 

secundas   convolant   nuptias.'     He  text  is  preserved  in  Bid/.  Nat.  MS. 

refers   to   the    statutes    of   Melun  24039  and  analysed  by  M.  Petit  de 

cathedral    (1365)    in    Instrumenta  Julleville. 

Hist.   Feci.    Melud.    ii.    503.     Cf.  *  In  Berks  a  draped  horse's  head 

Cone,  of  Langres  (1404)  'ludo  quod  is    carried,    and    the    proceeding 

dicitur  Chareuari,  in  quo  utuntur  known  as  a  Hooset  Hunt  (Ditch- 

larvis  in  figura  daemonum,  et  hor-  field,  178). 

renda  ibidem  committuntur  ';  Cone.  6  Ducange,    s.v.   Asini  caudam 

of  Angers  (1448),  c.  12  (Labbe",  xiii.  in  manu  tenens. 

1358)  '  pulsatione  patellarum,  pel-  6  Julleville,  Les  Com.  207. 
vium  et  campanarum,  eorum  oris 


154  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  in  one  locality  at  least  the  attendants  are  accustomed  to 
blacken  their  faces  l.  It  may  perhaps  be  taken  for  granted  that 
'  riding  the  stang '  is  an  earlier  form  of  the  punishment  than 
the  more  delicate  and  symbolical  'skimmington  riding';  and 
it  is  probable  that  the  rider  represents  a  primitive  village 
criminal  haled  off  to  become  the  literal  victim  at  a  sacrificial 
rite.  The  fine  or  forfeit  by  which  in  some  cases  the  offence 
can  be  purged  seems  to  create  an  analogy  between  the 
custom  under  consideration  and  other  sacrificial  survivals 
which  must  now  be  considered.  These  are  perhaps  best 
treated  in  connexion  with  Hock-tide  and  the  curious  play 
proper  to  that  festival  at  Coventry  2.  This  play  was  revived 
for  the  entertainment  of  Elizabeth  when  she  visited  the  Earl 
of  Leicester  at  Kenilworth  in  July,  1575,  and  there  exists  a  de- 
scription of  it  in  a  letter  written  by  one  Robert  Laneham,  who 
accompanied  the  court,  to  a  friend  in  London  3.  The  men  of 
Coventry,  led  by  one  Captain  Cox,  who  presented  it  called 
it  an  '  olid  storiall  sheaw,'  with  for  argument  the  massacre 
of  the  Danes  by  Ethelred  on  Saint  Brice's  night  100a4. 
Laneham  says  that  it  was  '  expressed  in  actionz  and  rymez,' 
and  it  appears  from  his  account  to  have  been  a  kind  of  sham 
fight  or  '  barriers '  between  two  parties  representing  respec- 
tively Danish  '  launsknights '  and  English,  '  each  with  allder 
poll  marcially  in  their  hand  V  In  the  end  the  Danes  were 
defeated  and  l  many  led  captiue  for  triumph  by  our  English 
wdemen.'  The  presenters  also  stated  that  the  play  was  of 
'  an  auncient  beginning '  and  '  woont  too  bee  plaid  in  oour 
Citee  yearely.'  Of  late,  however,  it  had  been  '  laid  dooun,' 
owing  to  the  importunity  of  their  preachers,  and  ( they 
woold  make  theyr  humbl  peticion  vntoo  her  highnes,  that 
they  myght   haue   theyr  playz  vp  agayn.'     The  records  of 

1  So  on  Ikhester  Meads,  where  4  Laneham,  or  his  informant,  ac- 
the  proceeding  is  known  as  Mom-  tually  said,  in  error,  1012.  On  the 
mets  or  Mommicks  (Barrett,  65).  historical  event  see  Ramsay,  i.  353. 

2  On  Hock-tide  and  the  Hock-  B  There  were  performers  both  on 
play  generally  see  Brand-Ellis,  i.  horse  and  on  foot.  Probably  hobby- 
107;  Strutt,  349;  Sharpe,  125;  horses  were  used,  for  Jonson  brings 
Dyer,  188  ;  S.  Denne,  Memoir  on  in  Captain  Cox  '  in  his  Hobby- 
Hokeday  in  Archaeologia,  vii.  244.  horse,'  which  was  '  foaled  in  Queen 

3  Cf.  Appendix  H.     An  allusion  Elizabeth's  time'  in  the  Masque  of 
to    the   play  by   Sir  R.  Morrison  Owls  (ed.  Cunningham,  iii.  188). 
(11542)  is  quoted  in  chap.  xxv. 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  155 

Coventry  itself  add  but  little  to  what  Laneham  gathered. 
The  local  Annals,  not  a  very  trustworthy  chronicle,  ascribe 
the  invention  of  '  Hox  Tuesday'  to  1416-7,  and  perhaps 
confirm  the  Letter  by  noting  that  in  1575-6  the  'pageants 
on  Hox  Tuesday '  were  played  after  eight  years  l.  We  have 
seen  that,  according  to  the  statement  made  at  Kenilworth, 
the  event  commemorated  by  the  performance  was  the  Danish 
massacre  of  1002.  There  was,  however,  another  tradition, 
preserved  by  the  fifteenth-century  writer  John  Rous,  which 
connected  it  rather  with  the  sudden  death  of  Hardicanute 
and  the  end  of  the  Danish  usurpation  at  the  accession  of 
Edward  the  Confessor2.  It  is,  of  course,  possible  that  local 
cantilenae  on  either  or  both  of  these  events  may  have  existed, 
and  may  have  been  worked  into  the  'rymez'  of  the  play. 
But  I  think  it  may  be  taken  for  granted  that,  as  in  the 
Lady  Godiva  procession,  the  historical  element  is  com- 
paratively a  late  one,  which  has  been  grafted  upon  already 
existing  festival  customs.  One  of  these  is  perhaps  the 
faction-fight  just  discussed.  But  it  is  to  be  noticed  that 
the  performance  as  described  by  Laneham  ended  with  the 
Danes  being  led  away  captive  by  English  women ;  and  this 
episode  seems  to  be  clearly  a  dramatization  of  a  characteristic 
Hock-tide  Indus  found  in  many  places  other  than  Coventry. 
On  Hock-Monday,  the  women  '  hocked '  the  men  ;  that  is  to 
say,  they  went  abroad  with  ropes,  caught  and  bound  any  man 
they  came  across,  and  exacted  a  forfeit.  On  Hock-Tuesday, 
the  men  retaliated  in  similar  fashion  upon  the  women. 
Bishop  Carpenter  of  Worcester  forbade  this  practice  in  his 
diocese  in  1450  3,  but  like  some  other  festival  customs  it  came 

1  Cf.  Representations,  s.  v.  Coven-  plays  proposed  for  municipal  per- 

try.  formance  in  1591  were  the  '  Con- 

3  Rossius,  Hist.  Regum  Angliae  quest  of  the  Danes 'and  the 'History 

(ed.  Hearne,  1716),  105  'in   cuius  of  Edward  the  Confessor.'     These 

signum  usque   hodie   ilia   die  vul-  were  to  be  upon  the  '  pagens,'  and 

gariter  dicta  Hox  Tuisday  ludunt  probably   they  were   more   regular 

in  villis  trahendo  cordas  partialiter  dramas  than  the  performance  wit- 

cum   aliis   iocis.'     Rous,  who  died  nessed  by  Elizabeth  in  1575  (Repre- 

1491,  is  speaking  of  the  death  of  sentation s,  s.  v.  Coventry).    » 

Hardicanute.      On   the   event    see  s  Leland,  Cot/ectanea(ed.  Hearne), 

Ramsay,  i.  434.  Possibly  both  events  v.  298  'uno  certo  die  heu   usitato 

were  celebrated  in  the  sixteenth  cen-  (forsan  Hoc  vocitato)  hoc  solempni 

tury  at  Coventry.    Two  of  the  three  festo  paschatis  transacto,  mulieres 


156  FOLK  DRAMA 

to  be  recognized  as  a  source  of  parochial  revenue,  and  the 
'gaderyngs'  at  Hock-tide,  of  which  the  women's  was  always 
the  most  productive,  figure  in  many  a  churchwarden's  budget 
well  into  the  seventeenth  century1.  At  Shrewsbury  in  1549 
*  hocking '  led  to  a  tragedy.  Two  men  were  '  smothered  under 
the  Castle  hill/  hiding  themselves  from  maids,  the  hill  falling 
there  on  them  V  '  Hockney  day '  is  still  kept  at  Hungerford, 
and  amongst  the  old-fashioned  officers  elected  on  this  occa- 
sion, with  the  hay-ward  and  the  ale-tasters,  are  the  two 
'  tything  men '  or  '  tutti  men,'  somewhat  doubtfully  said  to  be 
so  named  from  their  poles  wreathed  with  'tutties'  or  nose- 
gays, whose  function  it  is  to  visit  the  commoners,  and  to  claim 
from  every  man  a  coin  and  from  every  woman  a  kiss 3.  The 
derivation  of  the  term  Hock-tide  has  given  rise  to  some  wild 
conjectures,  and  philologists  have  failed  to  come  to  a  con- 
clusion on  the  subject  *  Hock-tide  is  properly  the  Monday 
and  Tuesday  following  the  Second  Sunday  after  Easter,  and 
'  Hokedaie '  or  Quindena  Paschae  is  a  frequent  term  day  in 
leases  and  other  legal  documents  from  the  thirteenth  century 
onwards  5. 

'  Hocking '  can  be  closely  paralleled  from  other  customs  of 
the  spring  festivals.  The  household  books  of  Edward  I 
record  in  1290  a  payment  'to  seven  ladies  of  the  queen's 
chamber  who  took  the  king  in  bed  on  the  morrow  of  Easter, 
and  made  him  fine  himself6.'  This  was  the  prisio  which  at 
a  later  date  perturbed  the  peace  of  French  ecclesiastics. 
The  council  of  Nantes,  for  instance,  in  1431,  complains  that 
clergy  were  hurried  out  of  their  beds  on  Easter  Monday, 
dragged  into  church,  and  sprinkled  with  water  upon  the 
altar  7.     In  this  aggravated  form  the  prisio  hardly  survived 

homines,  alioque  die  homines  mu-  ing ;  Hobhouse,  232  ;  N.E.  D.  s.  w. 

lieres  ligare,  ac  cetera  media  utinam  Hock,  &c. 

non  inhonesta  vel  deteriora  facere         2  Owen  and  Blakeway,  Hist,  of 

moliantur     et     exercere,     lucrum  Shrewsbury,  i.  559. 
ecclesiae   fingentes,  set   dampnum  3  Dyer,  191  ;  Ditchfield,  90. 

animae  sub  fucato  colore  lucrantes,  *  N.  E.  D.  s.  v.  Hock-day. 

&c.'  Riley,  561,  571,  gives  London  B  Brand-Ellis,  i.  106. 

proclamations  against  'hokkyng'  of         G  Ibid.  i.  109. 
1405  and  1409.  7  Ducange,    s.  v.    Prisio ;    Bar- 

1  Brand-Ellis,    i.    113;    Lysons,  the"lemy,iv.463.  On  Innocents' Day, 

Environs  of  London,   i.   229 ;    C.  the  customs  of  taking  in  bed  and 

Kerry,  Accts.  oj rSt. Lawrence,  Read-  whipping  were  united  (cf.  ch.  xii). 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  157 

the  frank  manners  of  the  Middle  Ages.  But  it  was  essentially 
identical  with  the  ceremonies  in  which  a  more  modern  usage 
has  permitted  the  levying  of  forfeits  at  both  Pasque  and  Pen- 
tecost. In  the  north  of  England,  women  were  liable  to  have 
their  shoes  taken  on  one  or  other  of  these  feasts,  and  must 
redeem  them  by  payment.  On  the  following  day  they  were 
entitled  to  retaliate  on  the  shoes  of  the  men 1.  A  more  widely 
spread  method  of  exacting  the  droit  is  that  of  '  heaving.' 
The  unwary  wanderer  in  some  of  the  northern  manufactur- 
ing towns  on  Easter  Monday  is  still  liable  to  find  himself 
swung  high  in  the  air  by  the  stalwart  hands  of  factory  girls, 
and  will  be  lucky  if  he  can  purchase  his  liberty  with  nothing 
more  costly  than  a  kiss.  If  he  likes,  he  may  take  his  revenge 
on  Easter  Tuesday 2.  Another  mediaeval  custom  described  by 
Belethus  in  the  twelfth  century,  which  prescribed  the  whip- 
ping of  husbands  by  wives  on  Easter  Monday  and  of  wives 
by  husbands  on  Easter  Tuesday,  has  also  its  modern  parallel 3. 
On  Shrove  Tuesday  a  hockey  match  was  played  at  Leicester, 
and  after  it  a  number  of  young  men  took  their  stand  with 
cart  whips  in  the  precincts  of  the  Castle.  Any  passer-by  who 
did  not  pay  a  forfeit  was  liable  to  lashes.  The  '  whipping 
Toms/  as  they  were  called,  were  put  down  by  a  special  Act  of 
Parliament  in  1 847  4.  The  analogy  of  these  customs  with 
the  requirement  made  of  visitors  to  certain  markets  or  to 
the  roofs  of  houses  in  the  building  to  '  pay  their  footing '  is 
obvious  6. 

In  all  these  cases,  even  where  the  significant  whipping  or 
sprinkling  is  absent,  the  meaning  is  the  same.  The  binding 
with  ropes,  the  loss  of  the  shoes,  the  lifting  in  the  air,  are 

1  Northern  F.  L.  84 ;  Brand-Ellis,  3  Belethus,  c.  120  '  notandum 
i.  94, 96  ;  Vaux,  242  ;  Ditchfield,  80 ;  quoque  est  in  plerisque  regionibus 
Dyer,  133.  secundo  die  post  Pascha  mulieres 

2  Brand-Ellis,  i.  106 ;  Owen  and  maritos  suos  verberare  ac  vicissim 
Blakeway,  i.  559;  Dyer,  173 ;  Ditch-  viros  eas  tertio  die.'  The  spiritually 
field,  90;  Burne  -  Jackson,  336;  minded  Belethus  explains  the  custom 
Northern  F.  L.  84 ;  Vaux,  242.  as  a  warning  to  keep  from  carnal 
A  dignified  H.  M.  I.  is  said  to  have  intercourse. 

made  his  first  official  visit  to  War-  *  Dyer,  79 ;  Ditchfield,  83. 

rington  on  Easter  Monday,  and  to  8  Brand-Ellis,  i.  114;  Ditchfield, 

have    suffered   accordingly.      Miss  252.  Mr.  W.  Crooke  has  just  studied 

Burne  describes  sprinkling  as  an  this  and  analogous  customs  in  The 

element  in  Shropshire  heaving.  Lifting  of  the  Bride  (F.L.  xiii.  226). 


158  FOLK  DRAMA 

symbols  of  capture.  And  the  capture  is  for  the  purposes  of 
sacrifice,  for  which  no  more  suitable  victim,  in  substitution  for 
the  priest-king,  than  a  stranger,  could  be  found.  This  will, 
I  think,  be  clear  by  comparison  with  some  further  parallels 
from  the  harvest  field  and  the  threshing-floor,  in  more  than 
one  of  which  the  symbolism  is  such  as  actually  to  indicate 
the  sacrifice  itself,  as  well  as  the  preliminary  capture.  In 
many  parts  of  England  a  stranger,  and  sometimes  even  the 
farmer  himself,  when  visiting  a  harvest  field,  is  liable  to  be 
asked  for  '  largess  ' l.  In  Scotland,  the  tribute  is  called 
'  head-money,'  and  he  who  refuses  is  seized  by  the  arms  and 
feet  and  '  dumped '  on  the  ground  2.  Similar  customs  prevail 
on  the  continent,  in  Germany,  Norway,  France ;  and  the 
stranger  is  often,  just  as  in  the  '  hocking '  ceremony,  caught 
with  straw  ropes,  or  swathed  in  a  sheaf  of  corn.  It  is  mainly 
in  Germany  that  the  still  more  elaborate  rites  survive.  In 
various  districts  of  Mecklenburg,  and  of  Pomerania,  the 
reapers  form  a  ring  round  the  stranger,  and  fiercely  whet 
their  scythes,  sometimes  with  traditional  rhymest  which  con^ 
tain  a  threat  to  mow  him  down.  In  Schleswig,  and  again 
in  Sweden,  the  stranger  in  a  threshing-floor  is  'taught 
the  flail-dance '  or  '  the  threshing-song.'  The  arms  of  a 
flail  are  put  round  his  neck  and  pressed  so  tightly  that  he 
is  nearly  choked.  When  the  madder-roots  are  being  dug, 
a  stranger  passing  the  field  is  caught  by  the  workers,  and 
buried  up  to  his  middle  in  the  soil 3. 

The  central  incident  of '  hocking '  appears  therefore  to  be 
nothing  but  a  form  of  that  symbolical  capture  of  a  human 
victim  of  which  various  other  examples  are  afforded  by  the 
village  festivals.  The  development  of  the  custom  into  a  play 
or  mock-fight  at  Coventry  may  very  well  have  taken  place, 
as  the  town  annals  say,  about  the  beginning  of  the  fifteenth 
century.  Whether  it  had  previously  been  connected  by  local 
tradition  with  some  event  in  the  struggles  of  Danes  and  Saxons 
or  not,  is  a  question  which  one   must  be  content  to  leave 

1  Suffolk  F.  L.  69  ;  F.  L.  v.  167.  to  Lancashire  gyst-ales  (Dyer,  182). 

The    use    of  largess,    a    Norman-  2  Ditchfield,  155. 

French  word  (largitio),  is  curious.  s  Frazer,  ii.  233 ;  Pfannenschmidt, 

It  is  also  used  for  the  subscriptions  93. 


FESTIVAL  PLAY  159 

unsolved.  A  final  word  is  due  to  the  curious  arrangement 
by  which  in  the  group  of  customs  here  considered  the  r61es 
of  sacrificers  and  sacrificed  are  exchanged  between  men  and 
women  on  the  second  day  ;  for  it  lends  support  to  the  theory 
already  put  forward  that  a  certain  stage  in  the  evolution  of 
the  village  worship  was  marked  by  the  merging  of  previously 
independent  sex-cults. 


CHAPTER  VIII 

THE  MAY-GAME 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  festal  character  of  primitive  dance  and 
song  is  admirably  brought  out  by  R.  WallascheK,  Primitive  Music  (1893) ; 
E.  Grosse,  Die  Anfdnge  der  Kunst  (1894,  French  transl.  1902) ;  Y.  Hirn, 
The  Origins  of  Art  (1900) ;  F.  B.  Gummere,  The  Beginnings  of  Poetry 
(1901).  The  popular  element  in  French  lyric  is  illustrated^by  A.  Jeanroy, 
Les  Origines  de  la  Podsie  lyrique  en  France  au  Moyen  Age  (1889),  and 
J.  Tiersot,  Histoire  de  la  Chanson  populaire  en  France  (1889).  Most 
of  such  English  material  as  exists  is  collected  in  Mrs.  Gomme's  Traditional 
Games  (1896-8)  and  G.  F.  NorthalJ,  English  Folk-Rhymes  (1892).  For 
comparative  study  E.  Martinengo-Cesaresco,  Essays  in  the  Study  of  Folk- 
songs (1886),  may  be  consulted.  The  notices  of  the  May-game  are 
scattered  through  the  works  mentioned  in  the  bibliographical  note  to 
ch.  vi  and  others.] 

THE  foregoing  chapter  has  illustrated  the  remarkable  variety 
of  modes  in  which  the  instinct  of  play  comes  to  find  expres- 
sion. But  of  all  such  the  simplest  and  most  primitive  is  un- 
doubtedly the  dance.  Psychology  discovers  in  the  dance  the 
most  rudimentary  and  physical  of  the  arts,  and  traces  it  to 
precisely  that  overflow  of  nervous  energies  shut  off  from  their 
normal  practical  ends  which  constitutes  play1.  And  the 
verdict  of  psychology  is  confirmed  by  philology ;  for  in  all  the 
Germanic  languages  the  same  word  signifies  both  'dance '  and 
'play,'  and  in  some  of  them  it  is  even  extended  to  the  cognate 
ideas  of '  sacrifice '  or  '  festival 2.'     The  dance  must  therefore 

1  Haddon,    335;     Grosse,    167;  Tanz,Gesang,Opfer,Aufzug.' From 

Herbert  Spencer  in  Contemp.  Re-  the  same  root  come  probably  ludus, 

view  (1895),   114;  Groos,  Play  of  and  possibly,  through   the  Celtic, 

Man,  88,  354.     Evidence  for   the  the  O.  F.   lai.     The   A.-S.  Idc  is 

wide  use  of  the   dance  at  savage  glossed  ludus,  sacrificium,  victimat 

festivals   is   given  by  Wallaschek,  munus.    It  occurs  in  the  compounds 

163,  187.  ecga-geldc  and  sveorda-geldc,  both 

'  Grimm,  i.  39  ;  Pearson,  ii.  133  ;  meaning  '  sword  -  dance,'  sige-ldc, 

Mu\\znh.off,Germania,  ch.  24,andd<?  'victory-dance,'  as-ldc, ' god-dance,' 

antiq.  Germ,  poesi  chorica, 4;  Kdgel,  wine-ldc,  '  love-dance  '  (cf.  p.  170), 

i.  1.  8.     The  primitive  word  form  &c.     An  A.-S.  synonym  for  Idc  is 

should   have  been  laikaz,  whence  plega,  '  play,'  which  gives  sweord- 

Gothic  laiks,  O.  N.  leikr,  O.  H.  G.  plega  and  ecg-plega.     Spil  is  not 

leih,  A.-S.  Idc.    The  word  has,  says  A.-S.  and  spilian  is  a  loan-word 

Miillenhoff,  all  the  senses  '  Spiel,  from  O.  H.  G. 


THE  MAY-GAME 


161 


be  thought  of  as  an  essential  part  of  all  the  festivals  with  which 
we  have  to  deal.  And  with  the  dance  comes  song :  the 
rhythms  of  motion  seem  to  have  been  invariably  accompanied 
by  the  rhythms  of  musical  instruments,  or  of  the  voice,  or  of 
both  combined  l. 

The  dance  had  been  from  the  beginning  a  subject  of  conten- 
tion between  Christianity  and  the  Roman  world  2 ;  but  where- 
as the  dances  of  the  East  and  South,  so  obnoxious  to  the 
early  Fathers,  were  mainly  those  of  professional  entertainers, 
upon  the  stage  or  at  banquets,  the  missionaries  of  the  West 
had  to  face  the  even  more  difficult  problem  of  a  folk-dance 
and  folk-song  which  were  amongst  the  most  inveterate  habits 
of  the  freshly  converted  peoples.  As  the  old  worship  vanished, 
these  tended  to  attach  themselves  to  the  new.  Upon  great 
feasts  and  wake-days,  choruses  of  women  invaded  with  wanton 
cantica  and  ballationes  the  precincts  of  the  churches  and  even 
the  sacred  buildings  themselves,  a  desecration  against  which 
generation  after  generation  of  ecclesiastical  authorities  was 
fain  to  protest  3.     Clerkly  sentiment  in  the  matter  is  repre- 

1  Gummere,  B.  P.  328 ;  Kogel,  i.     pervigiles    cum   ebrietate,  scurrili- 
1.  6. 

3  S.  Ambrose,  de  Elia  et  Ieiunio, 
c.  18  (P.  L.  xiv.  720),  de  Poeni- 
tentia,  ii.'  6  (P.  L.  xvi.  508) ;  S.  Au- 
gustine, contra  Parmenianum,  iii. 
6  (P.  L.  xliii.  107)  ;  S.  Chrysostom, 
Horn.  47  in  Julian,  mart.  p.  613; 
Horn.  23  de  Novilun.  p.  264  ;  C.  of 
Laodicea  (t366),  c.  53  (Mansi,  ii. 
571).  Cf.  B.C.  A.  s.  v.  Dancing, 
and  ch.  i.  Barthelemy,  ii.  438,  and 
other  writers  have  some  rather 
doubtful  theories  as  to  liturgical 
dancing  in  early  Christian  worship ; 
cf.  Julian.  Diet.  0/ Hymn.  206. 

3  Du  Menl,  Com.  67 ;  Pearson, 
ii.  17,  281;  Grober,  ii.  1.  444; 
Kogel,  i.  1.  25  ;  Indiculus  Super- 
stitionum  (ed.  Saupe),  10  'de  sacri- 
legiis  per  ecclesias.'  Amongst  the 
prohibitions  are  Caesarius  of  Aries 
(t542),.SVr,w0xiii  (P.  L.  xxxix.  2325) 
'  quam  multi  rustici  et  quam  multae 
mulieres  rusticanae  cantica  dia- 
bolica,  amatoria  et  turpia  memoriter 
retinent  et  ore  decantant '  ;  Const. 
Childeberti  (c.  554)  de  abol.  relig. 
idololatriae  (Mansi,  ix.  738) '  noctes 

CHAMBERS.     I  J^J 


tate,  vel  canticis,  etiam  in  ipsis 
sacris  diebus,  pascha,  natale  Do- 
mini, et  reliquis  festivitatibus,  vel 
adveniente  die  Dominico  dansa- 
trices  per  villas  ambulare  .  .  . 
nullatenus  fieri  permittimus '  \  C.of 
Auxerre  (573-603),  c.  9  (Maassen, 
i.  180)  '  non  licet  in  ecclesia  choros 
secularium  vel  puellarum  cantica 
exercere  nee  convivia  in  ecclesia 
praeparare';  C.  of  Chalons  (639- 
54),  c.  19  (Maassen,  i.  212)  'Valde 
omnibus  noscetur  esse  decretum, 
ne  per  dedicationes  basilicarum 
aut  festivitates  martyrum  ad  ipsa 
solemnia  confluentes  obscoena  et 
turpia  cantica,  dum  orare  debent 
aut  clericos  psallentes  audire,  cum 
choris  foemineis,  turpia  quidem 
decantare  videantur.  unde  con- 
venit,  ut  sacerdotes  loci  illos  a 
septa  basilicarum  vel  porticus  ip- 
sarum  basilicarum  etiam  et  ab 
ipsis  atriis  vetare  debeant  et  ar- 
cere.'  Sermo  Eligii  (Grimm,  iv. 
1737)  '  nullus  in  festivitate  S.  Ioan- 
nis  vel  quibuslibet  sanctorum 
solemnitatibus   solstitia  aut   valla- 


162 


FOLK  DRAMA 


sented  by  a  pious  legend,  very  popular  in  the  Middle  Ages, 
which  told  how  some  reprobate  folk  of  Kolbigk  in  Anhalt 
disobeyed  the  command  of  a  priest  to  cease  their  unholy 
revels  before  the  church  of  Saint  Magnus  while  he  said  mass 
on  Christmas  day,  and  for  their  punishment  must  dance  there 
the  year  round  without  stopping  \  The  struggle  was  a  long 
one,  and  in  the  end  the  Church  never  quite  succeeded  even  in 
expelling  the  dance  from  its  own  doors.  The  chapter  of 
Wells  about  1338  forbade  choreae  and  other  ludi  within  the 
cathedral  and  the  cloisters,  chiefly  on  account  of  the  damage 

tiones  vel  saltationes  aut  caraulas 
aut  cantica  diabolica  exerceat ' ; 
Judicium  dementis  (t  693),  c.  20 
(Haddan-Stubbs,  iii.  226)  '  si  quis 
in  quacunque  festivitate  ad  eccle- 
siam  veniens  pallat  foris,  aut  sal- 
tat,  aut  cantat  orationes  amatorias 
.  .  .  excommunicetur  '  (apparently 
a  fragment  of  a  penitential  com- 
posed by  Clement  or  Willibrord, 
an  A.-S.  missionary  to  Frisia,  on 
whom  see  Bede,  H.  E.  v.  9,  and 
the  only  dance  prohibition  of  pos- 
sible A.-S.  provenance  of  which  I 
know);  Statuta  Salisburensia  (Sah- 
burg:  t  800;  Boretius,  i.  229)  'Ut 
omnis  populus  .  .  .  absque  inlece- 
broso  canticu  et  lusu  saeculari  cum 
laetaniis  procedant';  C.  of  Mainz 
(81 3),  c.  48  (Mansi, xiv.  74)  'canticum 
turpe  atque  luxuriosum  circa  eccle- 
sias  agere  omnino  contradicimus ' ; 
C.  of  Rome  (826),  c.  35  (Mansi,  xiv. 
1008)  'sunt  quidam,  et  maxime 
mulieres,  qui  festis  ac  sacris  diebus 
atque  sanctorum  natalitiis  non  pro 
eorum  quibus  debent  delectantur  de- 
sideriis  advenire,  sed  ballando,  verba 
turpia  decantando,  choros  tenendoac 
ducendo,  similitudinem  paganorum 
peragendo,  advenire  procurant ' ; 
cf.  Dicta  abbatis  Pirminii  (Caspari, 
Kirchenliistorische  Anecdota,  1 88) ; 
Penitentiale  pseudo-  Theodorianum 


denunciations  of  the  Kalends  (ch. 
xi  and  Appendix  N).  Nearly  four 
centuries  after  the  C.  of  Rome  we 
find  the  C.  of  Avignon  (1209),  c.  17 
(Mansi,  xxii.  791)  '  statuimus,  ut  in 
sanctorum  vigiliis  in  ecclesiis  his- 
toricae  saltationes,  obscoeni  motus, 
seu  choreae  non  fiant,  nee  dicantur 
amatoria  carmina,  vel  cantilenae 
ibidem  .  .  .'  Still  later  the  C.  of 
Bayeux  (1300),  c.  31  (Mansi,  xxv. 
66)  '  ut  dicit  Augustinus,  melius  est 
festivis  diebus  fodere  vel  arare, 
quam  choreas  ducere  '  ;  and  so  on 
ad  infinitum.  The  pseudo-Augus- 
tine Sermo,  265,  de  Christiano 
nojnine  cu?n  operibus  non  Christi- 
anis  (P.  L.  xxxix.  2237),  which  is 
possibly  by  Caesarius  of  Aries, 
asserts  explicitly  the  pagan  charac- 
ter of  the  custom :  '  isti  enim 
infelices  et  miseri  homines,  qui 
balationes  et  saltationes  ante  ipsas 
basilicas  sanctorum  exercere  non 
metuunt  nee  erubescunt,  etsi 
Christiani  ad  ecclesiam  venerint, 
pagani  de  ecclesia  revertuntur ; 
quia  ista  consuetudo  balandi  de 
paganorum  observatione  remansit.' 
A  mediaeval  preacher  (quoted  by  A. 
Lecoy  de  la  Marche,  Chair e  fran- 
caise  au  Moyen  Age,  447,  from 
B.  N.  Lat.  MS.  "17509,  f.  146) 
declares,  '  chorea  enim  circulus  est 


(Wasserschleben,  607)  ;  Leonis  IV     cuius  centrum  est  diabolus,etomnes 
Homilia   (847,  Mansi,    xiv.    895);      vergunt  ad  sinistrum.' 


Benedictus  Levita,  Capitularia 
(t85o),  vi.  96  (M.  G.  H.  Script,  iv. 
2)  ;  and  for  Spain,  C.  of  Toledo 
(589),  c.  23  (Mansi,  be.  999),  and 
the  undated  C.  of  Braga,  c.  80 
(quoted  on  p.  144).     Cf.  also  the 


1  Tille,  D.  W.  301  ;  G.  Raynaud, 
in  Etudes  de'die'es  a  Gaston  Paris, 
53  ;  E.  Schroder,  Die  Tanzer  von 
Kolbigk,  in  Z.f  Kirchcngeschichte, 
xvii.  94  ;  G.  Paris,  in  Journal  des 
Savants  (1899),  733. 


THE  MAY-GAME 


163 


too  often  done  to  its  property  *.  A  seventeenth-century 
French  writer  records  that  he  had  seen  clergy  and  singing- 
boys  dancing  at  Easter  in  the  churches  of  Paris  2 ;  and  even 
at  the  present  day  there  are  some  astounding  survivals.  At 
Seville,  as  is  well  known,  the  six  boys,  called  los  Seises,  dance 
with  castanets  before  the  Holy  Sacrament  in  the  presence  of 
the  archbishop  at  Shrovetide,  and  during  the  feasts  of  the 
Immaculate  Conception  and  Corpus  Christi 3.  At  Echternach 
in  Luxembourg  there  is  an  annual  dance  through  the  church 
of  pilgrims  to  the  shrine  of  St.  Willibrord  4,  while  at  Barjols 
in  Provence  a  '  tripe-dance '  is  danced  at  mass  on  St.  Marcel's 
day  in  honour  of  the  patron  6. 

Still  less,  of  course,  did  dance  and  song  cease  to  be  important 
features  of  the  secular  side  of  the  festivals.  We  have  already 
seen  how  cantilenae  on  the  great  deeds  of  heroes  had  their 
vogue  in  the  mouths  of  the  chori  of  young  men  and  maidens, 
as  well  as  in  those  of  the  minstrels 6.     The  Carmina  Burana 


1  H.  E.  Reynolds,  Wells  Cathe- 
dral, 85  '  cum  ex  choreis  ludis  et 
spectaculis  et  Iapidum  proiectioni- 
bus  in  prae/ata  ecclesia  et  eius 
cemeteriis  ac  claustro  dissentiones 
sanguinis  efFusiones  et  violentiae 
saepius  oriantur  et  in  hiis  dicta 
Wellensis  ecclesia  multa  dispendia 
patiatur.' 

2  Menestrier,  Des  Ballets  anciens 
et  modernes  (1863),  4 ;  on  other 
French  church  dances,  cf.  Du  Til- 
liot,  21;  Barthe'lemy,  iv.  447; 
Leber,  ix.  420.  The  most  famous 
are  the  pilota  of  Auxerre,  which  was 
accompanied  with  ball-play  (cf.  ch. 
vi)  and  the  bergeretta  of  Besancon. 
Julian,  Diet,  of  Hymn.  206,  gives 
some  English  examples. 

3  Grove,  106.  A  full  account  of 
the  ceremony  at  the  feast  of  the 
Conception  in  1901  is  given  in  the 
Church  Times  for  Jan.  17,  1902. 

4  Grove,  103  ;  Berenger-F^raud, 
iii.  430;  Me'lusine  (1879),  39;  N. 
and  Q.  for  May  17,  1890.  The 
dance  is  headed  by  the  clergy,  and 
proceeds  to  a  traditional  tune  from 
the  banks  of  the  Sure  to  the  church, 
up.  sixty-two  steps,  along  the  north 


aisle,  round  the  altar  deasil,  and 
down  the  south  aisle.  It  is  curious 
that  until  the  seventeenth  century 
only  men  took  part  in  it.  St.  Willi- 
brord is  famous  for  curing  nervous 
diseases,  and  the  pilgrimage  is  done 
by  way  of  vow  for  such  cures.  The 
local  legend  asserts  that  the  cere- 
mony had  its  origin  in  an  eighth- 
century  cattle-plague,  which  ceased 
through  an  invocation  of  St.  Willi- 
brord :  it  is  a  little  hard  on  the 
saint,  whose  prohibition  of  dances 
at  the  church-door  has  just  been 
quoted. 

6  Berenger-Fe'raud,  iii.  409.  A 
similarly  named  saint,  St.  Martial, 
was  formerly  honoured  in  the  same 
way.  Every  psalm  on  his  day 
ended,  not  with  the  Gloria  Patri, 
but  with  a  dance,  and  the  chant, 
'  Saint- Marceau,  pregas  per  nous, 
et  nous  epingaren  per  vous '  (Du 
Meril,  La  Com.  68). 

0  Cf.  p.  26.  There  were  '  ma- 
dinnis  that  dansit '  before  James  IV 
of  Scotland  at  Forres,  Elgin  and 
Dernway  in  1504,  but  nothing  is 
said  of  songs  (L.  H.  T.  Accounts,  ii. 
463). 


M  a 


164  FOLK  DRAMA 

describe  the  dances  of  girls  upon  the  meadows  as  amongst 
the  pleasures  of  spring  1.  William  Fitzstephen  tells  us  that 
such  dances  were  to  be  seen  in  London  in  the  twelfth  century2, 
and  we  have  found  the  University  of  Oxford  solemnly  for- 
bidding them  in  the  thirteenth.  The  romans  and  pastonrelles 
frequently  mention  chansons  or  rondets  de  carole,  which  appear 
to  have  been  the  chansons  used  to  accompany  the  choric 
dances,  and  to  have  generally  consisted  of  a  series  of  couplets 
sung  by  the  leader,  and  a  refrain  with  which  the  rest  of  the 
band  answered  him.  Occasionally  the  refrains  are  quoted  3. 
The  minstrels  borrowed  this  type  of  folk  chanson,  and  the 
conjoint  dance  and  song  themselves  found  their  way  from  the 
village  green  to  the  courtly  hall.  In  the  twelfth  century 
ladies  carolent,  and  more  rarely  even  men  condescend  to  take 
a  part  4.  Still  later  carole,  like  tripudium,  seems  to  become  a 
term  for  popular  rejoicing  in  general,  not  necessarily  expressed 
in  rhythmical  shape  6. 

The  customs  of  the  village  festival  gave  rise  by  natural 
development  to  two  types  of  dance  6.  There  was  the  pro- 
cessional dance  of  the  band  of  worshippers  in  progress  round 
their  boundaries  and  from  field  to  field,  from  house  to  house, 

1  Carm.  Bur.  191  :  French  carole  was  always  accom- 

'  ludunt  super  gramina  panied,  not  with  a  flute,  but  with  a 

virgines  decorae  sung  chanson. 

quarum  nova  carmina  4  Paris,   loc.   cit.   410 ;    Jeanroy, 

dulci  sonant  ore.'  391.      In    Wace's     description     of 

Ibid.  195  :  Arthur's  wedding,  the  women   ca- 

1  ecce  florescunt  lilia,  rolent  and  the  men  behourdent.    Cf. 

et  virginum  dant  agmina  Bartsch,    Romanzen    und  Pastou- 

summo  deorum  carmina.'  rellen,  i.  13  : 

8  W.      Fitzstephen,      Descriptio  '  Cez    damoiseles     i     vont     por 

Londin.  {Mat.  for  Hist,  of  Becket,  caroler, 

R.  S.  iii.  Il)  '  puellarum  Cytherea  cil  escuier  i  vont  por  behorder, 

ducit  choros  usque  imminente  luna,  cil  chevalier  i  vont  por  esgar- 

et  pede  libero  pulsatur  tellus.'  der.' 

^  Jeanroy,  102,  387  ;  Guy,  504  ;  B  On  the  return   of  Edward    II 

Paris,  Journal  des  Savants  (1892),  and  Isabella  of  France  in  1308,  the 

407.      M.    Paris    points    out    that  mayor    and    other    dignitaries     of 

dances,    other    than    professional,  London  went  '  coram  rege  et  regina 

first  appear  in  the  West  after  the  karolantes'    (Chronicles     of    Ed- 

fall  of  the  Empire.      The  French  ward  I  and  Edward  II,   R.  S.  i. 

terms  for  dancing—  bailer,  danser,  152).     On  the  birth  of  Prince  Ed- 

treschier,    caroler — are    not    Latin,  ward    in    13 1 2,  they  '  menerent  la 

Caroler,  however,  he  thinks  to  be  karole'in  church  and  street  (Riley, 

the  Greek  xopavkfiv,  'to  accompany  107). 

a  dance  with    a    flute.'     But   the  a  Kogel,  i.  1.  6. 


THE  MAY-GAME  165 

from  well  to  well  of  the  village.  It  is  this  that  survives  in  the 
dance  of  the  Echternach  pilgrims,  or  in  the  'faddy-dance'  in 
and  out  the  cottage  doors  at  Helston  wake.  And  it  is  prob- 
ably this  that  is  at  the  bottom  of  the  interesting  game  of 
*  Thread  the  Needle.'  This  is  something  like  '  Oranges  and 
Lemons,'  the  first  part  of  which,  indeed,  seems  to  have  been 
adapted  from  it.  There  is,  however,  no  sacrifice  or  '  tug-of- 
war,'  although  there  is  sometimes  a  '  king,'  or  a  '  king '  and 
his  '  lady  '  or  '  bride  '  in  the  accompanying  rhymes,  and  in  one 
instance  a  '  pancake.'  The  players  stand  in  two  long  lines. 
Those  at  the  end  of  each  line  form  an  arch  with  uplifted  arms, 
and  the  rest  run  in  pairs  beneath  it.  Then  another  pair  form 
an  arch,  and  the  process  is  repeated.  In  this  way  long  strings 
of  lads  and  lasses  stream  up  and  down  the  streets  or  round 
and  about  a  meadow  or  green.  In  many  parts  of  England 
this  game  is  played  annually  on  Shrove  Tuesday  or  Easter 
Monday,  and  the  peasants  who  play  it  at  Chatre  in  central 
France  say  that  it  is  done  '  to  make  the  hemp  grow/  Its 
origin  in  connexion  with  the  agricultural  festivals  can  there- 
fore hardly  be  doubtful 1.  It  is  probable  that  in  the  beginning 
the  players  danced  rather  than  ran  under  the  '  arch ' ;  and  it 
is  obvious  that  the  •  figure  '  of  the  game  is  practically  identical 
with  one  familiar  in  Sir  Roger  de  Covcrlcy  and  other  old 
English  '  country '  dances  of  the  same  type. 

Just  as  the  '  country '  dance  is  derived  from  the  processional 
dance,  so  the  other  type  of  folk-dance,  the  ronde  or  'round,'  is 
derived  from  the  comparatively  stationary  dance  of  the  group 
of  worshippers  around  the  more  especially  sacred  objects  of 
the  festival,  such  as  the  tree  or  the  fire2.  The  custom  of 
dancing  round  the  May-pole  has  been  more  or  less  preserved 
wherever  the  May-pole  is  known.  But  '  Thread  the  Needle  ' 
itself  often  winds  up  with  a  circular  dance  or  ronde,  either 
around  one  of  the  players,  or,  on  festival  occasions,  around  the 
representative  of  the  earlier  home  of  the  fertilization  divinity, 

1  Mrs.  Gomme,  ii.  228;   Haddon,  room.     Grimm,  i.  52,  quotes  Gre- 
345.  gory  the  Great,  Dial.  iii.  28  on   a 

2  Cf.  ch.  vi  on  the  motion  deasil  Lombard  sacrifice,  '  caput  caprae, 
round    the    sacred    object.      It    is  hoc    ei,   per    circuitum    currentes, 
curious    that    the    modern    round  carmine  nefando  dedicantes.' 
dances    go    withershins    round    a 


&v 


166  FOLK  DRAMA 

the  parish  church.  This  custom  is  popularly  known  as 
1  clipping  the  church  V 

Naturally  the  worshippers  at  a  festival  would  dance  in  their 
festival  costume ;  that  is  to  say,  in  the  garb  of  leaves  and 
flowers  worn  for  the  sake  of  the  beneficent  influence  of  the 
indwelling  divinity,  or  in  the  hides  and  horns  of  sacrificial 
animals  which  served  a  similar  purpose.  Travellers  describe 
elaborate  and  beautiful  beast-dances  amongst  savage  peoples, 
and  the  Greeks  had  their  own  bear-  and  crane-dances,  as  well 
as  the  dithyrambic  goat-dance  of  the  Dionysia.  They  had 
also  flower  dances 2.  In  England  the  village  dancers  wear 
posies,  but  I  do  not  know  that  they  ever  attempt  a  more 
elaborate  representation  of  flowers.  But  a  good  example  of 
the  beast-dance  is  furnished  by  the  '  horn-dance '  at  Abbots 
Bromley  in  Staffordshire,  held  now  at  a  September  wake,  and 
formerly  at  Christmas.  In  this  six  of  the  performers  wear  sets 
of  horns.  These  are  preserved  from  year  to  year  in  the  church, 
and  according  to  local  tradition  the  dance  used  at  one  time 
to  take  place  in  the  churchyard  on  a  Sunday.  The  horns  are 
said  to  be  those  of  the  reindeer,  and  from  this  it  may  possibly 
be  inferred  that  they  were  brought  to  Abbots  Bromley  by 
Scandinavian  settlers.  The  remaining  performers  represent 
a  hobby-horse,  a  clown,  a  woman,  and  an  archer,  who  makes 
believe  to  shoot  the  horned  men  3. 

The  motifs  of  the  dances  and  their  chanso?is  must  also  at  first 
have  been  determined  by  the  nature  of  the  festivals  at  which 
they  took  place.  There  were  dances,  no  doubt,  at  such  domestic 

1  At    Bradford -on -Avon,    Wilts  '  dumplings' and 'a  bundle  of  rags' 

(which   preserves   its  Anglo-Saxon  perhaps    connect  themselves   with 

church),  and  at    South  Petherton,  the  cereal  cake  and  the  rags  hung 

Somerset,  in  both  cases  on  Shrove  on  the  tree  for  luck.     In  Cornwall 

Tuesday  (Mrs.  Gomme,  ii.  230)  ;  cf.  such  a  game  is  played  under  the 

Vaux,  18.  The  church  at  Painswick,  name  of  '  Snail's  Creep 'at  certain 

Gloucester,    is    danced    round    on  village  feasts  in  June,  and  directed 

wake-day  (F.  L.  viii.  392).     There  by  young  men  with  leafy  branches. 

is  a  group  of  games,  in  which  the  2  Du  Me"ril,  La  Com.  72  ;  Had- 

players  wind  and  unwind  in  spirals  don,  346;    Grove,  50,  81;  Haigh, 

round  a  centre.  Such  are  EllerTree,  14;     N.   W.   Thomas,    La    Dansc 

Windup  the  Bush  Faggot,a.nd  Butli-  totimique  en  Europe,  in  Actes  d. 

heisle.    These  Mrs.  Gomme  regards  Cong,  intern,  d.  Trad.  pop.  (1900). 

as   survivals  of    the   ritual    dance  ?  Plot,   Hist,  of  Staffs.   (1686)  ; 

round  a  sacred  tree.   Some  obscure  F.  L.  iv.  172;  vii.  382  (with  cuts  of 

references  in  the  rhymes  used  to  properties)  ;  Ditchfield,  139. 


THE  MAY-GAME 


167 


festivals  as  weddings  and  funerals  1.  In  Flanders  it  is  still  the 
custom  to  dance  at  the  funeral  of  a  young  girl,  and  a  very  charm- 
ing chanson  is  used  2.  The  development  of  epic  poetry  from 
the  cantilenae  of  the  war-festival  has  been  noted  in  a  former 
chapter.  At  the  agricultural  festivals,  the  primary  motif  is,  of 
course,  the  desire  for  the  fertility  of  the  crops  and  herds.  The 
song  becomes,  as  in  the  Anglo-Saxon  charm,  so  often  referred 
to,  practically  a  prayer  3.  With  this,  and  with  the  use  of 
'Thread  the  Needle'  at  Chatre  '  to  make  the  hemp  grow,'  may 
be  compared  the  games  known  to  modern  children,  as  to 
Gargantua,  in  which  the  operations  of  the  farmer's  year,  and 
in  particular  his  prayer  for  his  crops,  are  mimicked  in  a  ronde*. 
Allusions  to  the  process  of  the  seasons,  above  all  to  the 
delight  of  the  renouveau  in  spring,  would  naturally  also  find 
a  place  in  the  festival  songs.  The  words  of  the  famous 
thirteenth-century  lyric  were  perhaps  written  to  be  sung  to 
the  twinkling  feet  of  English  girls  in  a  round.  It  has  the 
necessary  refrain  : 


1  The  O.  H.  G.  hileih,  originally 
meaning  '  sex-dance,'  comes  to  be 
1  wedding.'  The  root  hi,  like  ivini 
(cf.  p.  1 70), has  asexual  connotation 
(Pearson,  ii.  132;  Kogel,  i.  1.  10). 

2  Coussemaker,  Chants  popu- 
laircs  des  Flamands  de  France, 
100: 

'  In  den  hemel  is  eenen  dans  : 
Alleluia. 
Daer   dansen   all'   de    maegde- 
kens : 
Benedicamus  Domino, 
Alleluia,  Alleluia, 
't  is  voor  Amelia : 

Alleluia. 
Wy  dansen   naer  de   maegde- 
kens : 
Benedicamus,  etc' 
8  Frazer,  i.  35  ;  Dyer,  7  ;  North- 
all,    233.     A    Lancashire    song    is 
sung    '  to    draw    you    these     cold 
winters   away,'  and  wishes  '  peace 
and  plenty '  to  the  household.     A 
favourite  French  May  chanson  is 
'  Etrennez  notre  £pous£e, 
Voici  le  mois, 
Le  joli  mois  de  Mai, 
Etrennez  notre  e"pouse"e 
En  bonne  £trenne. 


Voici  le  mois, 

Le  joli  mois  de  Mai, 
Qu'on  vous  amene.' 
If  the  queteurs  come  on  a  churl, 
they   have   an    ill-wishing  variant. 
The  following   is  characteristic   of 
the  French  peasantry : 

'  J'vous  souhaitons  autant  d'en- 
fants, 

Qu'y  a  des  pierrettes  dans  les 
champs.' 
Often  more  practical  tokens  of  re- 
venge are  shown.  The  Plough 
Monday  '  bullocks '  in  some  places 
consider  themselves  licensed  to 
plough  up  the  ground  before  a 
house  where  they  have  been  re- 
buffed.' 

*  Mrs.  Gomme,  ii.  1,  399  ;  Had- 
don,  343  ;  Du  Me"ril,  La  Com.  81. 
Amongst  the  jeux  of  the  young 
Gargantua  (Rabelais,  i.  22)  was  one 
'  a  semer  l'avoyne  et  au  laboureur.' 
This  probably  resembled  the  games 
of  Oats  and  Beans  and  Barley,  and 
Would  you  know  how  doth  the 
Peasant?  which  exist  in  English, 
French,  Catalonian,  and  Italian 
versions.  On  the  mimetic  character 
of  these  games,  cf.  ch.  viii. 


168  FOLK  DRAMA 

'  Sumer  is  icumen  in, 
Lhude  sing  cuccu ! 
Groweth  sed  and  bloweth  med 
And  springth  the  wde  nu, 

Sing  cuccu  ! 

'Awe  bleteth  after  lomb, 
Lhouth'  after  calve  cu. 
Bulloc  sterteth,  bucke  verteth, 
Murie  sing  cuccu  ! 

1  Cuccu,  cuccu,  wel  singes  thu,  cuccu  ; 
Ne  swik  thu  naver  nu. 
Sing  cuccu  nu.     Sing  cuccu. 
Sing  cuccu.     Sing  cuccu  nu!'1 

The  savour  of  the  spring  is  still  in  the  English  May  songs, 
the  French  maierolles  or  calendes  de  mat  and  the  Italian 
calen  di  maggio.  But  for  the  rest  they  have  either  become 
little  but  mere  qucte  songs,  or  else,  under  the  influence  of  the 
priests,  have  taken  on  a  Christian  colouring2.  At  Oxford 
the  '  merry  ketches  '  sung  by  choristers  on  the  top  of  Magdalen 
tower  on  May  morning  were  replaced  in  the  seventeenth 
century  by  the  hymn  now  used 3.  Another  very  popular 
Mayers'  song  would  seem  to  show  that  the  Puritans,  in  despair 
of  abolishing  the  festival,  tried  to  reform  it. 

1  Text  from  Harl.  MS.  978  in  formance  began  as  a  mass  for  the 
H.  E.  Wooldridge,  Oxford  Hist,  of  obit  of  Henry  VII.  The  hymn  is 
Music,  i.  326,  with  full  account,  printed  in  Dyer,  259 ;  Ditchfield, 
The  music,  to  which  religious  as  96.  It  has  no  relation  to  the  sum- 
well  as  the  secular  words  are  at-  mer  festival,  having  been  written  in 
tached,  is  technically  known  as  a  the  seventeenth  century  by  Thomas 
rota  or  rondel.  It  is  of  the  nature  Smith  and  set  by  Benjamin  Rogers 
of  polyphonic  part-song,  and  of  as  a  grace.  In  other  cases  hymns 
course  more  advanced  than  the  have  been  attached  to  the  village 
typical  mediaeval  rondet  can  have  festivals.  At  Tissington  the  '  well- 
been,  dressing,'    on    Ascension  Day    in- 

2  On  these  songs  in  general,  see  eludes  a  clerical  procession  in  which 
Northall,  233 ;  Martinengo-Cesa-  '  Rock  of  Ages '  and  '  A  Living 
resco,  249;  Cortet,  153;  Tiersot,  Stream 'are  sung  (Ditchfield,  187). 
191;  Jeanroy,  88;  Paris,  J.  des  A  special  '  Rushbearers'  Hymn' 
Savants  (1891),  685,  (1892),  155,  was  written  for  the  Grasmere  Rush- 
407.  bearing  in   1835,  and  a  hymn  for 

3  H.  A.  Wilson,  Hist,  of  Magd.  St.  Oswald  has  been  recently  added 
Coll.  (1899),  50.  Mr.  Wilson  dis-  (E.  G.  Fletcher,  The  Rushbearing, 
credits  the  tradition  that  the  per-  13,  74). 


THE  MAY-GAME  169 

'  Remember  us  poor  Mayers  all, 
And  thus  we  do  begin 
To  lead  our  lives  in  righteousness, 
Or  else  we  die  in  sin. 

'  We  have  been  rambling  all  this  night, 
And  almost  all  this  day : 
And  now  returned  back  again, 

We  have  brought  you  a  branch  of  May. 

'  A  branch  of  May  we  have  brought  you, 
And  at  your  door  it  stands ; 
It  is  but  a  sprout,  but  it's  well  budded  out, 
By  the  work  of  our  Lord's  hands,'  &C.1 

Another  religious  element,  besides  prayer,  may  have  entered 
into  the  pre-Christian  festival  songs;  and  that  is  myth. 
A  stage  in  the  evolution  of  drama  from  the  Dionysiac  dithy- 
ramb was  the  introduction  of  mythical  narratives  about  the 
wanderings  and  victories  of  the  god,  to  be  chanted  or  recited  by 
the  choragns.  The  relation  of  the  choragus  to  the  chorus  bears 
a  close  analogy  to  that  between  the  leader  of  the  mediaeval 
carole  and  his  companions  who  sang  the  refrain.  This  leader 
probably  represents  the  Keltic  or  Teutonic  priest  at  the  head 
of  his  band  of  worshippers ;  and  one  may  suspect  that  in  the 
north  and  west  of  Europe,  as  in  Greece,  the  pauses  of  the 
festival  dance  provided  the  occasion  on  which  the  earliest 
strata  of  stories  about  the  gods,  the  hieratic  as  distinguished 
from  the  literary  myths,  took  shape.  If  so  the  development  of 
divine  myth  was  very  closely  parallel  to  that  of  heroic  myth  2. 
After  religion,  the  commonest  motif  of  dance  and  song  at 
the  village  festivals  must  have  been  love.  This  is  quite  in 
keeping  with  the  amorous  licence  which  was  one  of  their 
characteristics.  The  goddess  of  the  fertility  of  earth  was  also 
the  goddess  of  the  fertility  of  women.  The  ecclesiastical  pro- 
hibitions lay  particular  stress  upon  the  orationes  amatoriac  and 
the  cantica  turpia  et  luxuriosa  which  the  women  sang  at  the 
church  doors,  and  only  as  love-songs  can  be  interpreted  the 
winileodi  forbidden  to  the  inmates  of  convents  by  a  capitulary 

1  Dyer,  240,  from  Hertfordshire.    There  are  many  other  versions ;  cf. 
Northall,  240.  *  Kogel,  i.  I.  32. 


170  FOLK  DRAMA 

of  789  *.  The  love-interest  continues  to  be  prominent  in  the 
folk-song,  or  the  minstrel  song  still  in  close  relation  to  folk- 
song, of  mediaeval  and  modern  France.  The  beautiful  wooing 
chanson  of  Transformations,  which  savants  have  found  it 
difficult  to  believe  not  to  be  a  supercherie ;  is  sung  by  harvesters 
and  by  lace-makers  at  the  pillow2.  That  of  Marion,  an  ironic 
expression  of  wifely  submission,  belongs  to  Shrove  Tuesday  3. 
These  are  modern,  but  the  following,  from  the  Chansonnier 
de  St.  Germain,  may  be  a  genuine  mediaeval  folk-song  of 
Limousin  provenance : 

'A  l'entrada  dal  tems  clar,  eya, 
Per  joja  recomencar,  eya, 
Et  per  jelos  irritar,  eya, 
Vol  la  regina  mostrar 
Qu'el'  es  si  amoroza. 
Alavi',  alavia  jelos, 
Laissaz  nos,  laissaz  nas 
Ballar  entre  nos,  entre  nos  V 

The  '  queen '  here  is,  of  course,  the  festival  queen  or  lady  of 
the  May,  the  regina  avrillosa  of  the  Latin  writers,  la  reine,  la 
marine,  liponse'e,  la  trimousette  of  popular  custom 6.  The 
defiance  of  the  jelos,  and  the  desire  of  the  queen  and  her 
maidens  to  dance  alone,  recall  the  conventional  freedom  of 
women  from  restraint  in  May,  the  month  of  their  ancient  sex- 
festival,  and  the  month  in  which  the  mediaeval  wife-beater 
still  ran  notable  danger  of  a  chevauche'e. 

1  Pertz,  Leges,  i.  68  '  nullatenus  the  idea  of  this  poem  in  A  Match 
ibi  uuinileodos  scribere  vel  mittere  (Poems  and  Ballads,  1st  Series, 
praesumat.'     Kogel,  i.  1.  61  :   Goe-      116). 

deke,  i.  11,  quote  other  uses  of  the  3  Romania,  ix.  568. 

term  from  eighth-century    glosses,  *  K.  Bartsch,  Chrest.  Prov.  ill. 

e.g.    '  uuiniliod,   cantilenas  saecu-  A  similar  chanson  is  in  G.  Raynaud, 

lares,  psalmos  vulgares,  seculares,  Motets,  i.  151,  and  another  is  de- 

plebeios  psalmos,  cantica  rustica  et  scribed  in  the  rotnan  of  Flamenca 

inepta.'     Winiliod  is  literally  '  love-  (ed.  P.  Meyer),  3244.    It  ends 

song,'  from  root  wini  (conn,  with  '  E,  si  parla,  qu'il  li  responda  : 

Venus).      Kogel  traces   an   earlier  Nom  sones  mot,  faitz  vos  en  lai, 

term  O.  H.  G.  winileih,  A.-S.  wine-  Qu'entre  mos  braes  mos  amies 

Idc  =  hileih.     On  the  erotic  motive  j'ai. 

in  savage  dances,  cf.  Grosse,  165,  Kalenda  maia.     E  vai  s'  en.' 

172  ;  Him,  229.  5  Trimousette,   from  tri  tnd  cd, 

2  Romania,  vii.  61  ;  Trad.  Pop.  an  unexplained  burden  in  some  of 
i.  98.     Mr.  Swinburne  has  adapted  the  French  maierolles. 


THE  MAY-GAME  171 

The  amorous  note  recurs  in  those  types  of  minstrel  song 
which  are  most  directly  founded  upon  folk  models.  Such  are 
the  chansons  a  danser  with  their  refrains,  the  chansons  de  mal- 
mariies,  in  which  the  'Jalous'  is  often  introduced,  the  anbes 
and  the  pastourelles1.  Common  in  all  of  these  is  the  spring 
setting  proper  to  the  chansons  of  our  festivals,  and  of  the 
( queen  '  or  '  king  '  there  is  from  time  to  time  mention.  The 
leading  theme  of  the  pastourelles  is  the  wooing,  successful  or 
the  reverse,  of  a  shepherdess  by  a  knight.  But  the  shepherdess 
has  generally  also  a  lover  of  her  own  degree,  and  for  this  pair 
the  names  of  Robin  and  Marion  seem  to  have  been  conven- 
tionally appropriated.  Robin  was  perhaps  borrowed  by  the 
pastourelles  from  the  widely  spread  refrain 

'  Robins  m'aime,  Robins  m'a : 
Robins  m'a  demandee  :   si  m'ara2.' 

The  borrowing  may,  of  course,  have  been  the  other  way  round, 
but  the  close  relation  of  the  chanson  a  danser  with  its  refrain 
to  the  dance  suggests  that  this  was  the  earliest  type  of  lyric 
minstrelsy  to  be  evolved,  as  well  as  the  closest  to  the  folk-song 
pattern.  The  pastourelle  forms  a  link  between  folk-song  and 
drama,  for  towards  the  end  of  the  thirteenth  century  Adan  de 
la  Hale,  known  as '  le  Bossu,'  a  minstrel  of  Arras,  wrote  a  Jeu  de 
Robin  et  Marion,  which  is  practically  a  pastourelle  par  person- 
nages.  The  familiar  theme  is  preserved.  A  knight  woos 
Marion,  who  is  faithful  to  her  Robin.  Repulsed,  he  rides 
away,  but  returns  and  beats  Robin.  All,  however,  ends* 
happily  with  dances  and  jeu x  amongst  the  peasants.  Adan 
de  la  Hale  was  one  of  the  train  of  Count  Robert  of  Artois  in 
Italy.  The  play  may  originally  have  been  written  about  1283 
for  the  delectation  of  the  court  of  Robert's  kinsman,  Charles, 
king  of  Naples,  but  the  extant  version  was  probably  produced 
about  1290  at  Arras,  when  the  poet  was  already  dead. 
Another  hand  has  prefixed  a  dramatic  prologue,  the  Jeu  du 
Pelerin,  glorifying  Adan,  and  has  also  made  some  interpola- 
tions in  the  text  designed  to  localize  the  action  near  Arras. 

1  Guy,  503.  197,  295  ;  Raynaud,  Rec.  de  Motets, 

2  Tiersot,  Robin  et  Marion  ;  Guy,      i.  227. 
506.     See  the  refrain  in  Bartsch, 


172  FOLK  DRAMA 

The  performers  are  not  likely  to  have  been  villagers  :  they 
may  have  been  the  members  of  some  puy  or  literary  society, 
which  had  taken  over  the  celebration  of  the  summer  festival. 
In  any  case  the  Jeu  de  Robin  et  Marion  is  the  earliest  and 
not  the  least  charming  of  pastoral  comedies  l. 

It  is  impossible  exactly  to  parallel  from  the  history  of 
English  literature  this  interaction  of  folk-song  and  minstrelsy 
at  the  French  fete  dn  mat.  For  unfortunately  no  body  of 
English  mediaeval  lyric  exists.  Even  '  Sumer  is  icumen  in ' 
only  owes  its  preservation  to  the  happy  accident  which  led 
some  priest  to  fit  sacred  words  to  the  secular  tune  ;  while  the 
few  pieces  recovered  from  a  Harleian  manuscript  of  the  reign 
of  Edward  I,  beautiful  as  they  are,  read  like  adaptations  less 
of  English  folk-song,  than  of  French  lyric  itself2.  Neverthe- 
less, the  village  summer  festival  of  England  seems  to  have 
closely  resembled  that  of  France,  and  to  have  likewise  taken 
in  the  long  run  a  dramatic  turn.  A  short  sketch  of  it  will  not 
be  without  interest. 

I  have  quoted  at  the  beginning  of  this  discussion  of  folk- 
customs  the  thirteenth-century  condemnations  of  the  Inductio 
Maii  by  Bishop  Grosseteste  of  Lincoln  and  of  the  ludide  Rege 
et  Regina  by  Bishop  Chanteloup  of  Worcester.  The  ludus  de 
Rege  et  Regina  is  not  indeed  necessarily  to  be  identified  with 
the  Inductio  Maii,  for  the  harvest  feast  or  Inductio  Autumni  of 
Bishop  Grosseteste  had  also  its  '  king '  and  '  queen,'  and  so  too 
had  some  of  the  feasts  in  the  winter  cycle,  notably  Twelfth 
night 3.     It  is,  however,  in  the  summer  feast  held  usually  on 

1  Langlois,    Robin    et  Marion  :  those  by  E.  Langlois  (1896),  and 

Romania,  xxiv.  437  ;  H.  Guy,  A  dan  by   Bartsch   in   La   Langue  et  la 

de  la  Hale,  177;  J.  Tiersot,  Sur  le  Litteraticre  francaises   (1887),  col. 

Jeu  de  Robin   et  Marion    (1897);  523.     E.  de  Coussemaker,  CEuvres 

Petit  de  Julleville,  La  Comddie,  27  ;  de  Adam  de  la  Halle  (1872),  347, 

Rep.  Com.  21,  324.     Ajeuoi  Robin  gives  the  music,  and  A.  Rambeau, 

et    Marion    is    recorded    also    as  Die  dent    Trouvere    Adam    de  la 

played  at  Angers  in  1392,  but  there  Halle     zugeschriebenen      Dramen 

is  no  proof  that  this  was  Adan  de  (1886),    facsimiles    the     text.     On 

la  Hale's  play,  or  a  drama  at  all.  Adan  de  la  Hale's  earlier  sottie  of 

There  were  folk  going  '  desguiziez,  La  Feuille'e,  see  ch.  xvi. 

a  un  jeu   que  Ten    dit   Robin    et  2  Thomas  Wright,  Lyrical  Poems 

Marion,  ainsi  qu'il  est   accoutume'  of  the  Reign  of  Edward  I  (Percy 

de  fere,  chacun  an,  en  les  foiries  de  Soc). 

Penthecouste '  (Guy,  197).  The  best  3  Cf.  ch.  xvii. 
editions  of  Robin  et  Marion  are 


THE  MAY-GAME 


173 


the  first  of  May  or  at  Whitsuntide  *,  that  these  rustic  dignitaries 
are  more  particularly  prominent.  Before  the  middle  of  the 
fifteenth  century  I  have  not  come  across  many  notices  of  them. 
That  a  summer  king  was  familiar  in  Scotland  is  implied  by 
the  jest  of  Robert  Bruces  wife  after  his  coronation  at  Scone  in 
1306  2.  In  1412  a  '  somerkyng '  received  a  reward  from  the 
bursar  of  Winchester  College  3.  But  from  about  1450  onwards 
they  begin  to  appear  frequently  in  local  records.  The  whole 
ludus  is  generally  known  as  a  '  May-play '  or  'May-game,'  or 
as  a  '  king-play 4,'  '  king's  revel  V  or  '  king-game  6.'  The 
leading  personages  are  indifferently  the  '  king '  and  '  queen,'  or 
1  lord  '  and  '  lady.'  But  sometimes  the  king  is  more  specifically 
the  '  somerkyng '  or  rex  aestivalis.  At  other  times  he  is  the 
'  lord  of  misrule  V  or  takes  a  local  title,  such  as  that^  of  the 
'Abbot  of  Marham,'  'Mardall,'  'Marrall,'  'Marram,'  'Mayvole' 
or  'Mayvoll'  at  Shrewsbury  8,  and  the  'Abbot  of  Bon-Accord' 


1  The  May-game  is  probably  in- 
tended by  the  '  Whitsun  pastorals ' 
of  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  4.  134,  and 
the  '  pageants  of  delight '  at  Pente- 
cost, where  a  boy  '  trimmed  in 
Madam  Julias  gown '  played  '  the 
woman's  part '  (i.  e.  Maid  Marian) 
of  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  iv.  4. 
163.  Cf.  also  W.  Warner,  Albioris 
England,  v.  25  : 

'  At  Paske  began  our  Morrise,  and 
ere  Penticost  our  May.' 

2  Flores  Historiarum  (R.  S.),  iii. 
130  '  aestimo  quod  rex  aestivalis 
sis ;  forsitan  hyemalis  non  eris.' 

s  Cf.  Appendix  E. 

*  '  King-play'  at  Reading  (Read- 
ing St.  Giles  Accounts  in  Brand- 
Hazlitt,  i.  157  ;  Kerry,  Hist,  of  St. 
Lawrence,  Reading,  226). 

6  '  King's  revel '  at  Croscombe, 
Somerset  ( Churchwardens'  Ac- 
counts in  Hobhouse,  3). 

6  'King'sgame'at  Leicester  (Kel- 
ly, 68)  and  'King-game'  at  Kingston 
(Lysons,  Environs  of  London,  i. 
225).  On  the  other  hand  the  King- 
game  in  church  at  Hascombe  in  1 578 
(Representations,  s.  v.  Hascombe), 
was  probably  a  miracle-play  of  the 
Magi  or  Three  Kings  of  Cologne. 
This  belongs  to  Twelfth  night  (cf. 


ch.xix),but  curiously  the  accounts  of 
St.  Lawrence,  Reading,  contain  a 
payment  for  the  '  Kyngs  of  Colen  ' 
on  May  day,  1498  (Kerry,  loc.  cit.). 

7  Cf.  ch.  xvii.  Local '  lords  of  mis- 
rule' in  the  summer  occur  at  Mon- 
tacute  in  1447-8  (Hobhouse,  183 
'  in  expensis  Regis  de  Montagu  apud 
Tyntenhull  existentis  tempore  aesti- 
vali'),  at  Meriden  in  1565  (Sharpe, 
209),  at  Melton  Mowbray  in  1558 
(Kelly,  65),  at  Tombland,  near  Nor- 
wich (Norfolk  Archaeology,  iii.  7 ;  xi. 
345),  at  Broseley,  near  Much  Wen- 
lock,  as  late  as  1652  (Burne-Jackson, 
480).  See  the  attack  on  them  in 
Stubbes,  i.  146.  The  term  'lord  of 
misrule '  seems  to  have  been  bor- 
rowed from  Christmas  (ch.  xvii). 
It  does  not  appear  whether  the 
lords  of  misrule  of  Old  Romney  in 
1525  (Archaeologia  Cantiana,  xiii. 
216)  and  Braintree  in  1531  (Pear- 
son, ii.  413)  were  in  winter  or  sum- 
mer. 

8  Owen  and  Blakeway,  i.  33 1  ; 
Jackson  and  Burne,  480  (cf.  Appen- 
dix E).  Miss  Burne  suggests  several 
possible  derivations  of  the  name  ; 
from  mar  '  make  mischief,'  from 
Mardoll  or  Marwell  (St.  Mary's 
Well),  streets    in   Shrewsbury,   or 


174  FOLK  DRAMA 

at  Aberdeen  K  The  use  of  an  ecclesiastical  term  will  be  ex- 
plained in  a  later  chapter  2.  The  queen  appears  to  have  been 
sometimes  known  as  a  'whitepot'  queen3.  And  finally  the  king 
and  queen  receive,  in  many  widely  separated  places,  the  names 
of  Robin  Hood  and  Maid  Marian,  and  are  accompanied  in 
their  revels  by  Little  John,  Friar  Tuck,  and  the  whole  joyous 
fellowship  of  Sherwood  Forest 4.  This  affiliation  of  the  ludus 
de  Rege  et  Regina  to  the  Robin  Hood  legend  is  so  curious  as 
to  deserve  a  moment's  examination  5. 

The  earliest  recorded  mention  of  Robin  Hood  is  in 
Langland's  Piers  Plowman,  written  about  1377.  Here  he 
is  coupled  with  another  great  popular  hero  of  the  north  as 
a  subject  of  current  songs : 

'But  I  can  rymes  of  Robyn  hood,  and  Randolf  erle  of 
Chestre  V 
In  the  following  century  his  fame  as  a  great  outlaw  spread  far 
and  wide,  especially  in  the  north  and  the  midlands  7.  The 
Scottish  chronicler  Bower  tells  us  in  1447  that  whether  for 
comedy  or  tragedy  no  other  subject  of  romance  and  minstrelsy 

from  Muryvale  or  Meryvalle,  a  local  that  from   1553  Robin  Hood  suc- 

hamlet.     But  the  form   '  Mayvoll '  ceeds  the  Abbot  of  Mayvoie  in  the 

seems  to  point  to  '  Maypole.'  May-game  at  Shrewsbury  (Appen- 

1  Representations,  s.  v.  Aberdeen,  dix  E).  Similarly,  in  an  Aberdeen 
Here  the  lord  of  the  summer  feast  order  of  1508  we  find  'Robert  Huyid 
seems  to  have  acted  also  as  pre-  and  Litile  Johne,  quhilk  was  callit, 
senter  of  the  Corpus  Christi  plays.  in  yers  bipast,  Abbat  and  Prior  of 

2  Cf.  ch.  xvii.  Bonacord  '    {Representations,    s.  v. 

3  Batman,  Golden  Books  of  the  Aberdeen).  Robin  Hood  seems, 
Leaden  Gods  (1577),  f.  30.  The  therefore,  to  have  come  rather  late 
Pope  is  said  to  be  carried  on  the  into  the  May-games,  but  to  have 
backs  of  four  deacons,  '  after  the  enjoyed  a  widening  popularity. 
maner  of  carying  whytepot  queenes  6  The  material  for  the  study  of 
in  Western  May  games.'  A  'white-  the  Robin  Hood  legend  is  gathered 
pot '  is  a  kind  of  custard.  together  by  S.  Lee  in  D.  N.  B.  s,  v. 

4  Such  phrases  occur  as  '  the  Hood  ;  Child,  Popular  Ballads,  v. 
May -play  called  Robyn  Hod'  39  ;  Ritson,  Robin.  Hood  (1832);  J.M. 
(Kerry,  Hist,  of  St.  Lawrence,  Gutch,  Robin  Hood  (1847).  Prof. 
Reading,  226,  s.  a.  1502),  'Robin  Child  gives  a  critical  edition  of  all 
Hood  and  May  game  '  and  '  Kyng-  the  ballads. 

gam  and  Robyn  Hode  '  {Kingston  8  Piers  Plowman,  B-text,  passus 

Accounts,  1505-36,  in  Lysons,  En-  v.  401. 

virons  of  London,   i.  225).      The  7  Fabian,  Chronicle,  687,  records 

accounts  of  St.  Helen's,  Abingdon,  in    1502  the   capture  of  'a  feiowe 

in  1566,  have  an  entry  'for  setting  whych    hadde    renewed    many   of 

up  Robin  Hood's  bower'  (Brand-  Robin     Hode's     pagentes,     which 

Hazlitt,  i.  144).     It  is  noticeable  named  himselfe  Greneleef.' 


THE  MAY-GAME  175 

had  such  a  hold  upon  the  common  folk1.  The  first  of  the 
extant  ballads  of  the  cycle,  A  Gest  of  Robyn  Hode,  was 
probably  printed  before  1500,  and  in  composition  may  be  at 
least  a  century  earlier.  A  recent  investigator  of  the  legend,  and 
a  very  able  one,  denies  to  Robin  Hood  any  traceable  historic 
origin.  He  is,  says  Dr.  Child,  '  absolutely  a  creation  of  the 
ballad  muse.'  However  this  may  be,  the  version  of  the 
Elizabethan  playwright  Anthony  Munday,  who  made  him  an 
earl  of  Huntingdon  and  the  lover  of  Matilda  the  daughter  of 
Lord  Fitzwater,  may  be  taken  as  merely  a  fabrication.  And 
whether  he  is  historical  or  not,  it  is  difficult  to  see  how  he  got, 
as  by  the  sixteenth  century  he  did  get,  into  the  May-game. 
One  theory  is  that  he  was  there  from  the  beginning,  and  that 
he  is  in  fact  a  mythological  figure,  whose  name  but  faintly 
disguises  either  Woden  in  the  aspect  of  a  vegetation  deity 2, 
or  a  minor  wood-spirit  Hode,  who  also  survives  in  the 
Hodeken  of  German  legend  3.  Against  this  it  may  be  pointed 
out,  firstly  that  Hood  is  not  an  uncommon  English  name, 
probably  meaning  nothing  but  '  a-Wood  or  '  of  the  wood  V 
and  secondly  that  we  have  seen  no  reason  to  suppose  that  the 
mock  king,  which  is  the  part  assigned  to  Robin  Hood  in 
the  May-game,  was  ever  regarded  as  an  incarnation  of  the 
fertilization  spirit  at  all.  He  is  the  priest  of  that  spirit,  slain 
at  its  festival,  but  nothing  more.  I  venture  to  offer  a  more 
plausible  explanation.  It  is  noticeable  that  whereas  in  the 
May-game  Robin  Hood  and  Maid  Marian  are  inseparable,  in 
the  early  ballads  Maid  Marian  has  no  part.  She  is  barely 
mentioned  in  one  or  two  of  the  latest  ones 5.  Moreover 
Marian  is  not  an  English  but  a  French  name,  and  we  have 
already  seen  that  Robin  and  Marion  are  the  typical  shepherd 
and  shepherdess  of  the  French  pastonrelles  and  of  Adan  de 

1  Cf.  p.  177.  If  he  is  mythological  at  all,  may  he 

2  Kiihn,  in    Haupt's  Zeitschrift,  not  be  a  form  of  the  '  wild-man ' 
v.  481.  or    '  wood-woz  '   of  certain  spring 

3  Ramsay,  F.  E.  i.  168.  dramatic      ceremonies,     and      the 

4  In  the  Nottingham  Hall-books  'Green  Knight'  of  romance?     Cf. 
(Hist.  MSS.  i.  105),  the  same  local-  ch.  ix. 

ity  seems  to  be  described  in  1548  as  6  The  earliest  mention  of  her  is 

'Robyn  Wood's  Well,'  and  in  1597  (tisoo)  in  A.  Barclay,  Eclogue,  5, 

as  '  Robyn    Hood's  Well.'     Robin  '  some  may  fit  of  Maide  Marian  or 

Hood  is  traditionally  clad  in  green,  else  of  Robin  Hood.' 


176  FOLK  DRAMA 

la  Hale's  dramatic  jeu  founded  upon  these.  I  suggest  then, 
that  the  names  were  introduced  by  the  minstrels  into  English 
and  transferred  from  the  French  fetes  du  mai  to  the  '  lord ' 
and  '  lady '  of  the  corresponding  English  May-game.  •  Robin 
Hood  grew  up  independently  from  heroic  cantilenae,  but  owing 
to  the  similarity  of  name  he  was  identified  with  the  other 
Robin,  and  brought  Little  John,  Friar  Tuck  and  the  rest  with 
him  into  the  May-game.  On  the  other  hand  Maid  Marian, 
who  does  not  properly  belong  to  the  heroic  legend,  was  in 
turn,  naturally  enough,  adopted  into  the  later  ballads.  This 
is  an  hypothesis,  but  not,  I  think,  an  unlikely  hypothesis. 

Of  what,  then,  did  the  May-game,  as  it  took  shape  in 
the  fifteenth  and  sixteenth  centuries,  consist  ?  Primarily,  no 
doubt,  of  a  quite  or  '  gaderyng.'  In  many  places  this  became 
a  parochial,  or  even  a  municipal,  affair.  In  1498  the  corpora- 
tion of  Wells  possessed  moneys  ' provenientes  ante  hoc  tempus 
de  Robynhode1.'  Elsewhere  the  churchwardens  paid  the 
expenses  of  the  feast  and  accounted  for  the  receipts  in 
the  annual  parish  budget2.  There  are  many  entries  con- 
cerning the  May-game  in  the  accounts  of  Kingston-on- 
Thames  during  some  half  a  century.  In  1506  it  is  recorded 
that  '  Wylm.  Kempe '  was  '  kenge '  and  '  Joan  Whytebrede ' 
was  'quen.'  In  1513  and  again  in  1536  the  game  went  to 
Croydon 3.  Similarly  the  accounts  of  New  Romney  note  that 
in  1422  or  thereabouts  the  men  of  Lydd  'came  with  their 
may  and  ours  V  and  those  of  Reading  St.  Lawrence  that  in 
1505  came  '  Robyn  Hod  of  Handley  and  his  company'  and 
in  1507  '  Robyn  Hod  and  his  company  from  ffynchamsted 5.' 
In  contemporary  Scotland  James  IV  gave  a  present  at  mid- 

1  Hist.  MSS.  i.  107, from  Convo-  raised  by  the  'lord'  was  set  aside 
cation  Book,  '  pecuniae  ecclesiae  ac  for  mending  the  highways  (Kelly, 
communitatis  Welliae .  .  .  videlicet,      65). 

provenientes  ante   hoc  tempus  de  3  LysonsyEnvirons,  i.  225.    Men- 

Robynhode,  puellis  tripudiantibus,  tion  is  made  of  Robin  Hood,'  'the 

communi  cervisia  ecclesiae,  ethuius-  Lady,'      'Maid     Marion,'     'Little 

modi.'  John,'  '  the  Frere,'  '  the  Fool,*  '  the 

2  The  accounts  of  Croscombe,  Dysard,'  '  the  Morris-dance.' 
Somerset,  contain  yearly  entries  of  *  Archaeologia  Cantiana, xiii.  216. 
receipts  from  '  Roben  Hod's  re-  6  C.  Kerry,  History  of  St.  Law- 
cones'  from  1476  to  15 10,  and  rence,  Reading,  226.  'Made  Ma- 
again  in  1525  (Hobhouse,  1  sqq.).  ryon,'  'the  tree'  and  'the  morris- 
At    Melton  Mowbray   the   amount  dance,'  are  mentioned. 


THE  MAY-GAME  177 

summer  in  1503  ( to  Robin  Hude  of  Perth1.'  It  would  hardly 
have  been  worth  while,  however,  to  carry  the  May-game  from 
one  village  or  town  to  another,  had  it  been  nothing  but  a 
procession  with  a  garland  and  a  '  gaderyng ' ;  and  as  a  matter 
of  fact  we  find  that  in  England  as  in  France  dramatic 
performances  came  to  be  associated  with  the  summer  folk- 
festivals.  The  London  '  Maying '  included  stage  plays  2.  At 
Shrewsbury  lusores  under  the  Abbot  of  Marham  acted  inter- 
ludes '  for  the  glee  of  the  town '  at  Pentecost 3.  The  guild  of 
St.  Luke  at  Norwich  performed  secular  as  well  as  miracle 
plays,  and  the  guild  of  Holy  Cross  at  Abingdon  held  its 
feast  on  May  3  with  'pageants,  plays  and  May-games,'  as 
early  as  1445  4.  Some  of  these  plays  were  doubtless  miracles, 
but  so  far  as  they  were  secular,  the  subjects  of  them  were 
naturally  drawn,  in  the  absence  of  pastotirelles,  from  the  ballads 
of  the  Robin  Hood  cycle  5.  Amongst  the  Paston  letters  is 
preserved  one  written  in  1473,  m  which  the  writer  laments  the 
loss  of  a  servant,  whom  he  has  kept  '  thys  iij  yer  to  pleye 
Seynt  Jorge  and  Robyn  Hod  and  the  Shryff  off  Nottyngham6.' 
Moreover,  some  specimens  of  the  plays  themselves  are  still 
extant.  One  of  them,  unfortunately  only  a  fragment,  must  be 
the  very  play  referred  to  in  the  letter  just  quoted,  for  its 
subject  is  '  Robin  Hood  and  the  Sheriff  of  Nottingham,'  and 
it  is  found  on  a  scrap  of  paper  formerly  in  the  possession  of 
Sir  John  Fenn,  the  first  editor  of  the  Paston  Letters1.  A  second 

1  L.  H.  T.  Accounts,  ii.  377.  'tragoediae'  in  the  fifteenth  century, 

2  Stowe,  Survey  (1598),  38.     He      cf.  ch.  xxv. 

is   speaking  mainly  of  the   period  6  Gairdner,  Paston   Letters,    in. 

before  1 5 17,  when  there  was  a  riot  89;    Child,    v.    90;   '  W.  Woode, 

on 'Black' May-day, and  afterwards  whyche     promysed  .  .  .     he     wold 

the  May-games  were  not  '  so  freely  never  goo  ffro  me,  and  ther  uppon 

used  as  before.'  I  have  kepyd  hym  thys  iij  yer  to 

3  Appendix  E  (vi).  pleye  Seynt  Jorge  and  Robyn  Hod 
*  Cf.  Representations.  and  the  Shryff  off  Nottyngham,  and 
8  Bower  (t  1437),  Scotichronlcon  now,  when  I  wolde  have  good  horse, 

(ed.  Hearne),  iii.  774  '  ille  famosissi-  he  is  goon  into  Bernysdale,  and  I 

mus    sicarius    Robertus    Hode    et  withowt    a    keeper.'     The   North- 

Litill-Iohanne  cum  eorum  complici-  umberland   Household    Book,    60, 

bus,    de    quibus    stolidum    vulgus  makes    provision    for  '  liveries  for 

hianter  in  comoediis  et  tragoediis  Robin  Hood' in  theEarl's household, 

prurienter  festum  faciunt,  et,  prae  7  Printed  by  Child,  v.  90 ;  Manly, 

ceteris  romanciis,  mimos  et  barda-  i.  279.     The  MS.  of  the  fragment 

nos  cantitare  delectantur.'     On  the  probably  dates  before  1475. 
ambiguity    of    'comoediae'     and 

CHAMBERS.     I  N 


178  FOLK  DRAMA 

play  on '  Robin  Hood  and  the  Friar '  and  a  fragment  of  a  third 
on  '  Robin  Hood  and  the  Potter '  were  printed  by  Copland  in 
the  edition  of  the  Gest  of  Robyn  Hode  published  by  him  about 
1550 1.  The  Robin  Hood  plays  are,  of  course,  subsequent  to 
the  development  of  religious  drama  which  will  be  discussed 
in  the  next  volume.  They  are  of  the  nature  of  interludes,  and 
were  doubtless  written,  like  the  plays  of  Adan  de  la  Hale,  by 
some  clerk  or  minstrel  for  the  delectation  of  the  villagers.  They 
are,  therefore,  in  a  less  degree  folk-drama,  than  the  examples 
which  we  shall  have  to  consider  in  the  next  chapter.  But  it  is 
worthy  of  notice,  that  even  in  the  heyday  of  the  stage  under 
Elizabeth  and  James  I,  the  summer  festival  continued  to  supply 
motives  to  the  dramatists.  Anthony  Munday's  Downfall  and 
Death  of  Robert  Earl  of  Huntingdon  2,  Chapman's  May-Day, 
and  Jonson's  delightful  fragment  The  Sad  Shepherd  form  an 
interesting  group  of  pastoral  comedies,  affinities  to  which 
may  be  traced  in  the  As  You  Like  It  and  Winter  s  Tale 
of  Shakespeare  himself. 

As  has  been  said,  it  is  impossible  to  establish  any  direct 
affiliation  between  the  Robin  Hood  plays  and  earlier  caroles 
on  the  same  theme,  in  the  way  in  which  this  can  be  done  for 
Xhejeu  of  Adan  de  la  Hale,  and  the  Robin  and  Marion  of  the 
pastourcllcs.  The  extant  Robin  Hood  ballads  are  certainly  not 
caroles  ;  they  are  probably  not  folk-song  at  all,  but  minstrelsy 
of  a  somewhat  debased  type.  The  only  actual  trace  of  such 
caroles  that  has  been  come  across  is  the  mention  of '  Robene 
hude '  as  the  name  of  a  dance  in  the  Complaynt  of  Scotland 

1  Printed  by  Child,  v.  114,  127;  two  are  lost,  as  is  The  May  Lord 
Manly,  i.  281,  285.  They  were  ori-  which  Jonson  wrote  {Conversations 
ginally  printed  as  one  play  by  with  Drummond,2j).  Robin  Hood 
Copland  (t  1550).  also  appears  in  Peele's  Edward  I 

2  Printed  in  Dodsley-Hazlitt,  vol.  (ti59o),  and  the  anonymous  Look 
viii.  These  plays  were  written  for  About  You  (1600),  and  is  the  hero 
Henslowe  about  February  1598.  In  of  Greene's  George  a  Greene  the 
November  Chettle  '  mended  Roben  Pinner  of  Wakefield  (t  1593).  An- 
hood  for  the  corte'  {Henslowe 's  thonyMunday  introduced  him  again 
Diary,  118-20,139).  At  Christinas  into  his  pageant  of  Metropolis  Co- 
1600,  Henslowe  had  another  play  ronata  (161 5),  and  a  comedy  of 
of  '  Roben  hoodes  penerths  '  by  Robin  Hood  and  his  Crew  of  Sol- 
William  Haughton  {Diary,  174-5).  diers,  acted  at  Nottingham  on  the 
An  earlier  '  pastoral  pleasant  come-  day  of  the  coronation  of  Charles  II, 
die  of  Robin  Hood  and  Little  John '  was  published  in  1661.  On  all  these 
was  entered  on  the  Stationers'  Re-  plays,  cf.  F.  E.  Schelling,  The 
gisters  on  May  18,   1 594.     These  English  Chronicle  Play,  156. 


THE  MAY-GAME  179 

about  1548  \  Dances,  however,  of  one  kind  or  another,  there 
undoubtedly  were  at  the  May-games.  The  Wells  corporation 
accounts  mention  puellae  tripudiantes  in  close  relation  with 
Robynhode2.  And  particularly  there  was  the  morris-dance, 
which  was  so  universally  in  use  on  May-day,  that  it  borrowed, 
almost  in  permanence,  for  its  leading  character  the  name  of 
Maid  Marian.  The  morris-dance,  however,  is  common  to 
nearly  all  the  village  feasts,  and  its  origin  and  nature  will 
be  matter  for  discussion'  in  the  next  chapter. 

In  many  places,  even  during  the  Middle  Ages,  and  still 
more  afterwards,  the  summer  feast  dropped  out  or  degenerated. 
It  became  a  mere  beer-swilling,  an  '  ale  V  And  so  we  find  in 
the  sixteenth  century  a  '  king-ale  4 '  or  a  '  Robin  Hood's  ale  V 
and  in  modern  times  a  '  Whitsun-ale 6,'  a  'lamb-ale7'  or  a 
'gyst-ale8'  beside  the  'church-ales'  and  'scot-ales'  which  the 
thirteenth-century  bishops  had  already  condemned9.  On 
the  other  hand,  the  village  festival  found  its  way  to  court, 
and  became  a  sumptuous  pageant  under  the  splendour-loving 
Tudors.  For  this,  indeed,  there  was  Arthurian  precedent  in 
the  romance  of  Malory,  who  records  how  Guenever  was  taken 

1  Furnivall,    Robert   Laneham's  7  Cf.  p.  141. 

Letter,    clxiii.      Chaucer,  Rom.    of  8   At    Ashton-under-Lyne,    from 

Rose,  7455,  has  'the  daunce  Joly  1422  to  a  recent  date  (Dyer,  181). 

Robin,'  but  this  is  from  his  French  '  Gyst '  appears  to  be  either  '  gist ' 

original  '  li  biaus  Robins.'  {glte)  '  right  of  pasturage  '  or  a  cor- 

2  Cf.  p.  176.  ruption  of  '  guising' ;  cf.  ch.  xvii. 

3  Dyer,  278  ;  Drake,  86 ;  Brand-  9  Cf.  p.  91.  On  Scot-ale,  cf. 
Ellis,  i.  157  ;  Cutts,  Parish  Priests,  Ducange,  s.  v.  Scotallum;  Archaeo- 
317;  Archaeologia,  xii.  11  ;  Stubbes,  logia,  xii.  11  ;  H.  T.  Riley,  Muni- 
i.  150;  F.  L.  x.  350.  At  an  '  ale'  a  tnenta  Gildhallae  Londin.  (R. S.), 
cask  of  home-brewed  was  broached  ii.  760.  The  term  first  appears  as 
for  sale  in  the  church  or  church-  the  name  of  a  tax,  as  in  a  North- 
house,  and  the  profits  went  to  some  ampton  charter  of  1 189  (Markham- 
public  object ;  at  a  church-ale  to  the  Cox,  Northampton  Borough  Re- 
parish,  at  a  clerk-ale  to  the  clerk,  cords,  i.  26)  '  concessimus  quod  sint 
at  a  bride-ale  or  bridal  to  the  quieti  de  .  .  .  Brudtol  et  de  Child- 
bride,  at  a  bid-ale  to  some  poor  wite  et  de  hieresgiue  et  de  Scottale. 
man  in  trouble.  A  love-ale  was  ita  quod  Prepositus  Northampto- 
probably  merely  social.  nie  ut  aliquis  alius  Ballivus  scottale 

*  At  Reading  in  1557  (C.  Kerry,  non  faciat' ;  cf.  the  thirteenth-ceh- 
Hist.  of  St.  Lawrence,  Reading,  226).      tury  examples  quoted  by  Ducange. 

6  At   Tintinhull   in    1513    (Hob-  The  Council  of Lambeth  (1206),  c.  2, 

house,  200,  '  Robine  Hood's  All ').  clearly  defines  the  term  as  '  com- 

*  Brand-Ellis,  i.  157  ;  Dyer,  278.  munes  potationes,' and  the  primary 
Acarvingon  the  church  of  St. John's,  sense  is  therefore  probably  that  of 
Chichester,  represents  a  Whitsun-  an  ale  at  which  a  scot  or  tax  is 
ale,  with  a  •  lord '  and  '  lady.'  raised. 

N  2 


180  FOLK  DRAMA 

by  Sir  Meliagraunce,  when  •  as  the  queen  had  mayed  and  all 
her  knights,  all  were  bedashed  with  herbs,  mosses,  and  flowers, 
in  the  best  manner  and  freshest 1.'  The  chronicler  Hall  tells 
of  the  Mayings  of  Henry  VIII  in  1510,  151 1,  and  1515.  In 
the  last  of  these  some  hundred  and  thirty  persons  took  part. 
Henry  was  entertained  by  Robin  Hood  and  the  rest  with 
shooting-matches  and  a  collation  of  venison  in  a  bower  ;  and 
returning  was  met  by  a  chariot  in  which  rode  the  Lady  May 
and  the  Lady  Flora,  while  on  the  five  horses  sat  the  Ladies 
Humidity,  Vert,  Vegetave,  Pleasaunce  and  Sweet  Odour2. 
Obviously  the  pastime  has  here  degenerated  in  another 
direction.  It  has  become  learned,  allegorical,  and  pseudo- 
classic.  At  the  Reformation  the  May-game  and  the  May- 
pole were  marks  for  Puritan  onslaught.  Latimer,  in  one  of 
his  sermons  before  Edward  VI,  complains  how,  when  he  had 
intended  to  preach  in  a  certain  country  town  on  his  way  to 
London,  he  was  told  that  he  could  not  be  heard,  for  'it  is 
Robyn  hoodes  daye.  The  parishe  are  gone  a  brode  to  gather 
for  Robyn  hoode  V  Machyn's  Diary  mentions  the  breaking 
of  a  May-pole  in  Fenchurch  by  the  lord  mayor  of  1552  4,  and 
the  revival  of  elaborate  and  heterogeneous  May-games  through- 
out London  during  the  brief  span  of  Queen  Mary5.  The 
Elizabethan  Puritans  renewed  the  attack,  but  though  some- 
thing may  have  been  done  by  reforming  municipalities  here 
and  there  to  put  down  the  festivals  6,the  ecclesiastical  authori- 

1  Ma\ory,Morted,Arthur,yi\x.i.2.  *  Machyn,  20. 

9  Hall,   515,   520,  582;    Brewer,  5  Ibid.   89,    137,   196,   201,  283, 

Letters  and  Papers  of  Henry  VIII,  373.      In    1559,  e.g.  'the  xxiiij    of 

ii.  1504.     In  1 5 10,  Henry  and  his  June  ther  was     a    May-game  .  .  . 

courtiers  visited  the  queen's  cham-  and   Sant    John    Sacerys,    with    a 

ber  in  the  guise  of  Robin  Hood  and  gyant,  and  drumes  and  gunes  [and 

his  men  on  the  inappropriate  date  the]    ix    wordes    (worthies),    with 

of  January  18.     In  Scotland,  about  spechys,  and  a  goodly  pagant  with 

the   same   time,    Dunbar    wrote   a  a  quen  .  .  .  and  dyvers  odur,  with 

'  cry '   for    a   maying    with    Robin  spechys  ;  and  then  Sant  Gorge  and 

Hood  ;  cf.  Texts,  s.v.  Dunbar.  the  dragon,  the  mores  dansse,  and 

3    Latimer,    Sermon     vi     before  after  Robyn  Hode  and  lytyll  John, 

Edw.   VI  (1549,    ed.   Arber,    173).  and  M [aid  Marian]  and  frere  Tuke, 

Perhaps  the  town  was  Melton  Mow-  and  they  had  spechys  round  a-bout 

bray,  where  Robin  Hood  was  very  London.' 

popular,  and  where  Latimer  is  shown  6  '  Mr.  Tomkys  publickeprechar' 

by  the  churchwardens'  accounts  to  in  Shrewsbury  induced  the  bailiffs 

have  preached  several  years  later  in  to  '  reform'  May-poles  in  1588,  and 

1553  (Kelly,  67).  in  1591  some  apprentices  were  com- 


THE  MAY-GAME 


181 


ties  could  not  be  induced  to  go  much  beyond  forbidding  them 
to  take  place  in  churchyards l.  William  Stafford,  indeed, 
declared  in  1581  that  'May-games,  wakes,  and  revels'  were 
1  now  laid  down  V  but  the  violent  abuse  directed  against  them 
only  two  years  later  by  Philip  Stubbes,  which  may  be  taken 
as  a  fair  sample  of  the  Puritan  polemic  as  a  whole,  shows  that 
this  was  far  from  being  really  the  case  3.  In  Scotland  the 
Parliament  ordered,  as  early  as  1555,  that  no  one  'be  chosen 
Robert  Hude,  nor  Lytill  Johne,  Abbot  of  vnressoun,  Quenis 
of  Maij,  nor  vtherwyse,  nouther  in  Burgh  nor  to  land  wart  in 
ony  tyme  to  cum  *.'  But  the  prohibition  was  not  very  effective, 
for  in  1577  and  1578  the  General  Assembly  is  found  petition- 
ing for  its  renewal  5.  And  in  England  no  similar  action  was 
taken  until  1644  when  the  Long  Parliament  decreed  the 
destruction  of  such  May-poles  as  the  municipalities  had  spared. 
Naturally  this  policy  was  reversed  at  the  Restoration,  and 
a  new  London  pole  was  erected  in  the  Strand,  hard  by 
Somerset  House,  which  endured  until  17 17  6. 


mitted  for  disobeying  the  order.  A 
judicial  decision  was,  however,given 
in  favour  of  the  'tree'  (Burne-Jack- 
son,  358  ;  Hibbert,  English  Craft- 
Gilds,  121).  In  London  the  Cornhill 
Maypole,  which  gave  its  name  to 
St.  Andrew  Undershaft,  was  de- 
stroyed by  persuasion  of  a  preacher 
as  early  as  1549  (Dyer,  248)  ;  cf. 
also  Stubbes,  i.  306,  and  Morrison's 
advice  to  Henry  VIII  quoted  in 
ch.  xxv. 

1  Archbishop  Grindal's  Visita- 
tion Articles  of  1576  (Remains, 
Parker  Soc.  175),  'whether  the 
minister  and  churchwardens  have 
suffered  any  lords  of  misrule  or 
summer  lords  or  ladies,  or  any 
disguised  persons,  or  others,  in 
Christmas  or  at  May-games,  or  any 
morris-dancers,  or  at  any  other 
times,  to  come  unreverently  into 
the  church  or  churchyard,  and  there 
to  dance,  or  play  any  unseemly 
parts,  with  scoffs,  jests,  wanton 
gestures,  or  ribald  talk,  namely  in 
the  time  of  Common  Prayer.'  Si- 
milarly worded  Injunctions  for  Nor- 
wich (1569),  York  (1571),  Lichfield 
(1584),   London  (1601)  and  Oxlord 


(161 9)  are  quoted  in  the  Second 
Report  of  the  Ritual  Commission  ; 
cf.  the  eighty-eighth  Canon  of  1604. 
It  is  true  that  the  Visitation  Arti- 
cles for  St.  Mary's,  Shrewsbury,  in 
1584  inquire  more  generally  'whe- 
ther there  have  been  any  lords  of 
mysrule,  or  somer  lords  or  ladies,  or 
any  disguised  persons,  as  morice 
dancers,  maskers,  or  mum'ers,  or 
such  lyke,  within  the  parishe,  ether 
in  the  nativititide  or  in  som'er,  or 
at  any  other  tyme,  and  what  be 
their  names';  but  this  church  was 
a  'peculiar'  and  its  'official'  the 
Puritan  Tomkys  mentioned  in  the 
last  note  (Owen  and  Blakeway,  i. 
333  ;  Burne-Jackson,  481). 

2  Stafford,  16. 

3  Stubbes,  i.  146;  cf.  the  further 
quotations  and  references  there 
given  in  the  notes. 

4  6  Mary,  cap.  61. 

5  Child,  v.  45 ;  cf.  Representa- 
tions,s.v.  Aberdeen,  on  the  breaches 
of  the  statute  there  in  1562  and  1565. 

G  Dyer, 228;  Drake,«5.  At  Cerne 
Abbas,  Dorset,  the  May-pole  was 
cut  down  in  1635  and  made  into  a 
town  ladder  (F.  L.  x.  481). 


CHAPTER  IX 
THE  SWORD-DANCE 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  books  mentioned  in  the  bibliographical 
note  to  the  last  chapter  should  be  consulted  on  the  general  tendency 
to  fil/irja-is  in  festival  dance  and  song.  The  symbolical  dramatic  cere- 
monies of  the  renouveau  are  collected  by  Dr.  J.  G.  Frazer  in  The  Golden 
Bough.  The  sword-dance  has  been  the  subject  of  two  elaborate  studies  : 
K.  Miillenhoff,  Ueber  den  Schwerttanz,  in  Festgaben  fiir  Gustav  Homeyer 
(1871),  iii,  with  additions  in  Zeitschrift  fur  deutsches  Alterthum,  xviii.  9, 
xx.  10;  and  F.  A.  Mayer,  Ein  deutsches  Schwerttanzspiel  aus  Ungarn 
(with  full  bibliography),  in  Zeitschrift  fiir  Volkerpsychologic  (1889),  204, 
416.  The  best  accounts  of  the  morris-dance  are  in  F.  Douce,  Illustrations 
of  Shakespeare  (1807, new  ed.  l839),and  A.  Burton,  Rushbearing(  1 891),  95.] 

The  last  two  chapters  have  afforded  more  than  one  example 
of  village  festival  customs  ultimately  taking  shape  as  drama. 
But  neither  the  English  Robin  Hood  plays,  nor  the  French 
Jcu  de  Robin  et  Marion,  can  be  regarded  as  folk-drama  in  the 
proper  sense  of  the  word.  They  were  written  not  by  the  folk 
themselves,  but  by  trouvhes  or  minstrels  for  the  folk  ;  and  at 
a  period  when  the  independent  evolution  of  the  religious  play 
had  already  set  a  model  of  dramatic  composition.  Probably 
the  same  is  true  of  the  Hox  Tuesday  play  in  the  form  in 
which  we  may  conjecture  it  to  have  been  presented  before 
Elizabeth  late  in  the  sixteenth  century.  Nevertheless  it  is 
possible  to  trace,  apart  from  minstrel  intervention  and  apart 
from  imitation  of  miracles,  the  existence  of  certain  embryonic 
dramatic  tendencies  in  the  village  ceremonies  themselves. 
Too  much  must  not  be  made  of  these.  Jacob  Grimm  was 
inclined  to  find  in  them  the  first  vague  beginnings  of  the 
whole  of  modern  drama1.  This  is  demonstrably  wrong. 
Modern  drama  arose,  by  a  fairly  well  defined  line  of  evolution, 
from  a  threefold  source,  the  ecclesiastical  liturgy,  the  farce  of 
the  mimes,  the  classical  revivals  of  humanism.  Folk-drama 
contributed  but  the  tiniest  rill  to  the  mighty  stream.    Such  as 

1  Grimm,  ii.  784  ;  Kleinere  Schriften,  v.  281 ;  Pearson,  ii.  281. 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  183 

it  was,  however,  a  couple  of  further  chapters  may  be  not 
unprofitably  spent  in  its  analysis. 

The  festival  customs  include  a  number  of  dramatic  rites 
which  appear  to  have  been  originally  symbolical  expressions 
of  the  facts  of  seasonal  recurrence  lying  at  the  root  of  the 
festivals  themselves.  The  antithesis  of  winter  and  summer, 
the  rencuveau  of  spring,  are  mimed  in  three  or  four  distinct 
fashions.  The  first  and  the  most  important,  as  well  as  the 
most  widespread  of  these,  is  the  mock  representation  of  a  death 
or  burial.  Dr.  Frazer  has  collected  many  instances  of  the 
ceremony  known  as  the  '  expulsion  of  Death  V  This  takes 
place  at  various  dates  in  spring  and  early  summer,  but  most 
often  on  the  fourth  Sunday  in  Lent,  one  of  the  many  names 
of  which  is  consequently  Todten-Sonntag.  An  effigy  is  made, 
generally  of  straw,  but  in  some  cases  of  birch  twigs,  a  beechen 
bough,  or  other  such  material.  This  is  called  Death,  is  treated 
with  marks  of  fear,  hatred  or  contempt,  and  is  finally  carried 
in  procession,  and  thrust  over  the  boundary  of  the  village.  Or 
it  is  torn  in  pieces,  buried,  burnt,  or  thrown  into  a  river  or 
pool.  Sometimes  the  health  or  other  welfare  of  the  folk 
during  the  year  is  held  to  depend  on  the  rite  being  duly  per- 
formed. The  fragments  of  Death  have  fertilizing  efficacy  for 
women  and  cattle ;  they  are  put  in  the  fields,  the  mangers, 
the  hens'  nests.  Here  and  there  women  alone  take  part  in 
the  ceremony,  but  more  often  it  is  common  to  the  whole 
village.  The  expulsion  of  Death  is  found  in  various  parts  of 
Teutonic  Germany,  but  especially  in  districts  such  as  Thuringia, 
Bohemia,  Silesia,  where  the  population  is  wholly  or  mainly 
Slavonic.  A  similar  custom,  known  both  in  Slavonic  districts 
and  in  Italy,  France,  and  Spain,  had  the  name  of '  sawing  the 
old  woman.'  At  Florence,  for  instance,  the  effigy  of  an  old 
woman  was  placed  on  a  ladder.  At  Mid  Lent  it  was  sawn 
through,  and  the  nuts  and  dried  fruits  with  which  it  was 
stuffed  scrambled  for  by  the  crowd.  At  Palermo  there  was 
a  still  more  realistic  representation  with  a  real  old  woman,  to 
whose  neck  a  bladder  of  blood  was  fitted  2. 

1  Frazer,  ii.  82  ;  Grant  Allen,  293,  2  Frazer,  ii.  86  ;  Martinengo-Ce- 
315;  Grimm,  ii.  764;  Pearson,  ii.  saresco,  267.  Cf.  the  use  of  the 
283.  bladder  of  blood  in  the  St.  Thomas 


184  FOLK  DRAMA 

The  'Death '  of  the  German  and  Slavonic  form  of  the  custom 
has  clearly  come  to  be  regarded  as  the  personification  of  the 
forces  of  evil  within  the  village  ;  and  the  ceremony  of  expul- 
sion may  be  compared  with  other  periodical  rites,  European 
and  non-European,  in  which  evil  spirits  are  similarly  expelled1. 
The  effigy  may  even  be  regarded  in  the  light  of  a  scapegoat, 
bearing  away  the  sins  of  the  community  2.  But  it  is  doubtful 
how  far  the  notion  of  evil  spirits  warring  against  the  good 
spirits  which  protect  man  and  his  crops  is  a  European,  or  at 
any  rate  a  primitive  European  one  3 ;  and  it  may  perhaps  be 
taken  for  granted  that  what  was  originally  thought  to  be 
expelled  in  the  rite  was  not  so  much  either  '  Death  '  or  '  Sin  ' 
as  winter.  This  view  is  confirmed  by  the  evidence  of  an 
eighth-century  homily,  which  speaks  of  the  expulsion  of 
winter  in  February  as  a  relic  of  pagan  belief4.  Moreover,  the 
expulsion  of  Death  is  often  found  in  the  closest  relation  to 
the  more  widespread  custom  of  bringing  summer,  in  the  shape 
of  green  tree  or  bough,  into  the  village.  The  procession 
which  carries  away  the  dead  effigy  brings  back  the  summer 
tree  ;  and  the  rhymes  used  treat  the  two  events  as  connected5. 

The  homily  just  quoted  suggests  that  the  mock  funeral  or 
expulsion  of  winter  was  no  new  thing  in  the  eighth  century. 
On  the  other  hand,  it  can  hardly  be  supposed  that  customs 
which  imply  such  abstract  ideas  as  death,  or  even  as  summer 
and  winter,  belong  to  the  earliest  stages  of  the  village  festival. 
What  has  happened  is  what  happens  in  other  forms  of  festival 
play.  The  instinct  of  play,  in  this  case  finding  vent  in 
a   dramatic  representation  of  the  succession  of  summer  to 

procession   at  Canterbury  (Refire-  at  Oxford  (Dyer,  261)  and  elsewhere 
sentations,  s.  v.).  on  May  1,  and  I  have  heard  it  said 
1  Frazer,  iii.  70.     Amongst  such  that  the  object  of  the  Oxford  cus- 
customs  are  the  expulsion  of  Satan  torn   is  to  drive  away  evil   spirits. 
on  New  Year's  day  by  the  Finns,  Similar  discords  are  de  rigueur  at 
the  expulsion  of  Kore  at  Easter  in  Skimmington  Ridings.  I  very  much 
Albania,   the   expulsion  of  witches  doubt   whether  they  are  anything 
on    March   I   in    Calabria,  and  on  but  a  degenerate  survival  of  a  bar- 
May  1  in  the  Tyrol,  the  frightening  baric  type  of  music, 
of  the   wood-sprites    Strudeli   and  2  Frazer,  iii.  121. 
Stratteli  on  Twelfth  night  at  Brun-  8  Tylor,  Anthropology,  382. 
nen   in    Switzerland.      Such  cere-  4  Caspari,  10  '  qui  in  mense  fe- 
monies  are  often  accompanied  with  bruario  hibernum  credit  expellere. .. 
a  horrible  noise  of  horns,  cleavers  non  christianus,  sed  gentilis  est.' 
and  the  like.     Horns  are  also  used  6  Frazer,  ii.  91. 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  185 

winter,  has  taken  hold  of  and  adapted  to  its  own  purposes 
elements  in  the  celebrations  which,  once  significant,  have 
gradually  come  to  be  mere  traditional  survivals.  Such  are 
the  ceremonial  burial  in  the  ground,  the  ceremonial  burning, 
the  ceremonial  plunging  into  water,  of  the  representative  of 
the  fertilization  spirit.  In  particular,  the  southern  term  '  the 
old  woman  '  suggests  that  the  effigy  expelled  or  destroyed 
is  none  other  than  the  '  corn  mother '  or  '  harvest-May,' 
fashioned  to  represent  the  fertilization  spirit  out  of  the  last 
sheaf  at  harvest,  and  preserved  until  its  place  is  taken  by 
a  new  and  green  representative  in  the  spring. 

There  are,  however,  other  versions  of  the  mock  death  in 
which  the  central  figure  of  the  little  drama  is  not  the  represen- 
tative of  the  fertilization  spirit  itself,  but  one  of  the  worshippers. 
In  Bavaria  the  Whitsuntide  Pfi?igstl  is  dressed  in  leaves  and 
water-plants  with  a  cap  of  peonies.  He  is  soused  with  water, 
and  then,  in  mimicry,  has  his  head  cut  off.  Similar  customs 
prevail  in  the  Erzgebirge  and  elsewhere  \  We  have  seen 
this  Pjingstl  before.  He  is  the  Jack  in  the  green,  the  wor- 
shipper clad  in  the  god  under  whose  protection  he  desires  to 
put  himself2.  But  how  can  the  killing  of  him  symbolize  the 
spring,  for  obviously  it  is  the  coming  summer,  not  the  dying 
winter,  that  the  leaf-clad  figure  must  represent  ?  The  fact  is 
that  the  Bavarian  drama  is  not  complete.  The  full  ceremony 
is  found  in  other  parts  of  Germany.  Thus  in  Saxony  and 
Thuringia  a  '  wild  man '  covered  with  leaves  and  moss  is 
hunted  in  a  wood,  caught,  and  executed.  Then  comes  forward 
a  lad  dressed  as  a  doctor,  who  brings  the  victim  to  life  again 
by  bleeding3.  Even  so  annually  the  summer  dies  and  has  its 
resurrection.  In  Swabia,  again,  on  Shrove  Tuesday,  '  Dr. 
Eisenbart'  bleeds  a  man  to  death,  and  afterwards  revives 
him.  This  same  Dr.  Eisenbart  appears  also  in  the  Swabian 
Whitsuntide  execution,  although  here  too  the  actual  resur- 
rection seems  to  have  dropped  out  of  the  ceremony4.     It  is 

1  Frazer,  ii.  60.  similar  figures  are  not  uncommon 

2  Sometimes  the  Pfingstl  is  called  in   the   sixteenth-century  masques 
a    '  wild     man.'      Two     '  myghty  and  entertainments, 
woordwossys    [cf.  p.  392]  or  wyld  3  Frazer,  ii.  62. 

men' appeared  in  a  revel  at  the  court  *  Ibid.    ii.    61,    82;     E.    Meier, 

of  Henry  VIII  in  1 5 1 3  {Revels  Ac-      Deutsche  Sagen,  Sitten    und    Ge- 
count    in    Brewer,    ii.    1499),    and     brauche  aus  Schwaben,  374,  409. 


186  FOLK  DRAMA 

interesting  to  note  that  the  green  man  of  the  peasantry,  who 
dies  and  lives  again,  reappears  as  the  Green  Knight  in  one  of 
the  most  famous  divisions  of  Arthurian  romance  1. 

The  mock  death  or  burial  type  of  folk-drama  resolves  itself, 
then,  into  two  varieties.  In  one,  it  is  winter  whose  passing  is 
represented,  and  for  this  the  discarded  harvest-May  serves  as 
a  nucleus.  In  the  other,  which  is  not  really  complete  without 
a  resurrection,  it  is  summer,  whose  death  is  mimed  merely 
as  a  preliminary  to  its  joyful  renewal ;  and  this  too  is  built 
up  around  a  fragment  of  ancient  cult  in  the  person  of  the 
leaf-clad  worshipper,  who  is,  indeed,  none  other  than  the 
priest-king,  once  actually,  and  still  in  some  sort  and  show, 
slain  at  the  festival 2.  In  the  instances  so  far  dealt  with,  the 
original  significance  of  the  rite  is  still  fairly  traceable.  But 
there  are  others  into  which  new  meanings,  due  to  the  influence 
of  Christian  custom,  have  been  read.  In  many  parts  of 
Germany  customs  closely  analogous  to  those  of  the  expulsion 
of  winter  or  Death  take  place  on  Shrove  Tuesday,  and  have 
suffered  metamorphosis  into  'burial  of  the  Carnival3.'  England 
affords  the  'Jack  o'  Lent'  effigy  which  is  taken  to  represent 
Judas  Iscariot  4,  the  Lincoln  '  funeral  of  Alleluia  5,'  the  Tenby 

1  Syr  Gawayne  and  the  Grene  as  the  Carnival  or  Shrovetide 
Knyghte  (ed.   Madden,  Bannatyne      '  Fool '  or  '  Bear.' 

Club,  1839);  cf.  J.  L.  Weston,  The  4  Dyer,  93.     The  Jack  o'  Lent 

Legend  of  Sir  Gawain,  85.     Arthur  apparently    stood    as    a   cock-shy 

was    keeping    New     Year's    Day,  from  Ash  Wednesday  to  Good  Fri- 

when  a  knight   dressed   in   green,  day,  and  was  then  burnt.     Portu- 

with  a  green  beard,  riding  a  green  guese     sailors    in    English    docks 

horse,  and  bearing  a  holly  bough,  thrash  and  duck  an  effigy  of  Judas 

and  an  axe  of  green  steel,  entered  Iscariot    on    Good   Friday  (Dyer, 

the  hall.      He  challenged  any  man  155). 

of  the  Round  Table  to  deal  him  5  Alleluia  was  not  sung  during 
a  buffet  with  the  axe  on  condition  of  Lent.  Fosbrooke,  British  Mona- 
receiving  one  in  return  after  the  chism,  56,  describes  the  Funeral  of 
lapse  of  a  year.  Sir  Gawain  accepts.  Alleluia  by  the  choristers  of  an 
The  stranger's  head  is  cut  off,  but  English  cathedral  on  the  Saturday 
he  picks  it  up  and  rides  away  with  before  Septuagesima.  A  turf  was 
it.  This  is  a  close  parallel  to  the  carried  in  procession  with  howl- 
resurrection  of  the  slain  'wild  man.'  ing  to  the  cloisters.     Probably  this 

2  Frazer,  ii.  105,  115,  163,  219;  cathedral  was  Lincoln,  whence 
Pausanias,  iii.  53;  v.  259;  Gardner,  Wordsworth,  105,  quotes  payments 
New  Chapters  in  Greek  History,  '  pro  excludend' Alleluya'  from  1452 
395 >  give  Russian,  Greek,  and  Asia-  to  161 7.  Leber,  ix.  338  ;  Barthelemy, 
tic  parallels.  iii.  481,  give  French  examples  of 

3  Frazer,  ii.  71 ;  Pfannenschmidt,  the  custom;  cf.  the  Alleluia  top, 
302.  The  victim  is  sometimes  known  p.  128. 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  187 

1  making  Christ's  bed  V  the  Monkton  '  risin'  and  buryin' 
Peter  V  The  truth  that  the  vitality  of  a  folk  custom  is  far 
greater  than  that  of  any  single  interpretation  of  it  is  admirably 
illustrated. 

Two  other  symbolical  representations  of  the  phenomena  of 
the  renouvean  must  be  very  briefly  treated.  At  Briancon  in 
Dauphine,  instead  of  a  death  and  resurrection,  is  used  a  pretty 
little  May-day  drama,  in  which  the  leaf-clad  man  falls  into 
sleep  upon  the  ground  and  is  awakened  by  the  kiss  of  a 
maiden  3.  Russia  has  a  similar  custom  ;  and  such  a  magic 
kiss,  bringing  summer  with  it,  lies  at  the  heart  of  the  story  of 
the  Sleeping  Beauty.  Indeed,  the  marriage  of  heaven  and 
earth  seems  to  have  been  a  myth  very  early  invented  by  the 
Aryan  mind  to  explain  the  fertility  of  crops  beneath  the  rain, 
and  it  probably  received  dramatic  form  in  religious  ceremonies 
both  in  Greece  and  Italy 4.  Finally,  there  is  a  fairly  wide- 
spread spring  custom  of  holding  a  dramatic  fight  between  two 
parties,  one  clad  in  green  to  represent  summer,  the  other  in 
straw  or  fur  to  represent  winter.  Waldron  describes  this  in 
the  Isle  of  Man 5 ;  Olaus  Magnus  in  Sweden  6.  Grimm  says 
that  it  is  found  in  various  districts  on  both  sides  of  the  middle 
Rhine7.  Perhaps  both  this  dramatic  battle  and  that  of  the 
Coventry  Hox  Tuesday  owe  their  origin  to  the  struggle  for 
the  fertilizing  head  of  a  sacrificial  animal,  which  also  issued 
in  football  and  similar  games.  Dr.  Frazer  quotes  several  in- 
stances from  all  parts  of  the  world  in  which  a  mock  fight, 
or  an  interchange  of  abuse  and  raillery  taking  the  place  of 
an  actual  fight,  serves  as  a  crop-charm8.  The  summer  and 
winter  battle  gave  to  literature  a  famous  type  of  neo-Latin 
and  Romance  debat 9.    In  one  of  the  most  interesting  forms  of 

1  Dyer,  1 58.  Reeds  were  woven  May-queen  is  often  called  la  marine 
on  Good  Friday  into  the  shape  of     or  Fe'pouse. 

a  crucifix  and  left  in  some  hidden  *  Frazer,  i.  225  ;  Jevons,  Plutarch 

part  of  a  field  or  garden.  R.  Q.  lxxxiii.  56. 

2  Dyer,  333.  The  village  feast  6  Waldron,  Hist,  of  Isle  of  Man, 
was   on  St.  Peter's  day,  June  29.  95  ;  Dyer,  246. 

On  the  Saturday  before  an  effigy  6    Olaus     Magnus,     History    of 

was  dug  up  from  under  a  sycamore  Swedes    and    Goths,    xv.  4,  8,  9  ; 

on  Maypole   hill ;   a  week  later  it  Grimm,  ii.  774. 

was  buried  again.     In  this  case  the  7  Grimm,  ii.765;  Paul,  Grundriss 

order  of  events  seems  to  have  been  (ed.  1),  i.  836. 

inverted.  8  Frazer,  Pausanias,  iii.  267. 

3  Frazer,   i.   221.     The   French  9  Cf.  ch.  iv. 


188  FOLK  DRAMA 

this,  the  eighth-  or  ninth-century  Conflictus  Veris  et  Hiemis, 
the  subject  of  dispute  is  the  cuckoo,  which  spring  praises  and 
winter  chides,  while  the  shepherds  declare  that  he  must  be 
drowned  or  stolen  away,  because  summer  cometh  not.  The 
cuckoo  is  everywhere  a  characteristic  bird  of  spring,  and  his 
coming  was  probably  a  primitive  signal  for  the  high  summer 
festival  \ 

The  symbolical  dramas  of  the  seasons  stand  alone  and 
independent,  but  it  may  safely  be  asserted  that  drama  first 
arose  at  the  village  feasts  in  close  relation  to  the  dance.  That 
dancing,  like  all  the  arts,  tends  to  be  mimetic  is  a  fact  which 
did  not  escape  the  attention  of  Aristotle 2.  The  pantomimes 
of  the  decadent  Roman  stage  are  a  case  in  point.  Greek 
tragedy  itself  had  grown  out  of  the  Dionysiac  dithyramb, 
and  travellers  describe  how  readily  the  dances  of  the  modern 
savage  take  shape  as  primitive  dramas  of  war,  hunting,  love, 
religion,  labour,  or  domestic  life3.  Doubtless  this  was  the 
case  also  with  the  caroles  of  the  European  festivals.  The 
types  of  chanson  most  immediately  derived  from  these 
are  full  of  dialogue,  and  already  on  the  point  of  bursting 
into  drama.  That  they  did  do  this,  with  the  aid  of  the 
minstrels,  in  the  Jeu  de  Robin  et  de  Marion  we  have  seen4. 
A  curious  passage  in  the  Itinerarium  Cambriae  of  Giraldus 
Cambrensis   (f  1188)  describes  a  dance  of   peasants  in  and 

1  Grimm,  ii.  675,  763  ;  Swainson,  elle-meme  ...  en  simulant  la  gaiete" 

Folk-lore  of  British  Birds  (F.L.S.),  on  parvenait  reellement  a  la  sentir.' 

109;    Hardy,   Popular  History  of  3  Wallaschek,  216 ;  Grosse,  165, 

the   Cuckoo,  in   F.   L.   Record,  ii ;  201;  Hirn,  157,  182,229,259,261; 

Mannhardt,      in     Zeitschrift    fiir  Du    Menl,     Com.     72 ;     Haddon, 

deutsche  Mythologie,  iii.  209.     Cf.  346;  Grove,  52,  81  ;  Mrs.  Gomme, 

ch.  v.  ii.  518  ;  G.  Catlin,  On  Manners  .  .  . 

j*  Aristotle,  Poetics,  i.  5  aiV&5  8e  of  N.  Amer.  Indians  (1841),  i.  128, 

rep  pvdptp  [TroieiTcu  tt)v  fjiifx^aiv]  xap^  244.     Lang,  M.R.  R.  i.  272,  dwells 

dpfiovias  17  [Te^J"?]  tS>v  6pxrjo-T<bv,  Kcu  on  the  representation  of  myths  in 

yap   ovtoi    81a    r&v    <TxrHxaTlC°lx*VUlV  savage  mystery-dances,  and  points 

pvdpuv  pupovvTai  Ka\  fjOrj  ko.1  ■naQr]  Kal  out  that  Lucian  (loc.  cit.)  says  that 

■n-pdgeis.     Cf.  Lucian,  de  Saltatione,  the   Greeks  used    to   '  dance  out ' 

xv.   277.      Du    Menl,  65,  puts  the  {t^opx^dai)  their  mysteries, 

thing  well :  '  La  danse  n'a  6te  Tin-  4  The  chanson    of   Transforma- 

vention  de  personne  :  elle  s'est  pro-  tions  (cf.  p.  170)  is  sung  by  peasant- 

duite   d'elle-meme  le  jour   que    le  girls  as  a  semi-dramatic  duet  (Ro- 

corps  a  subi  et  du  refle'ter  un  £tat  mania,  vii.  62) ;  and  that  of  Marion 

de   Tame  .  .  .     On    ne   tarda   pas  was   performed    '  a    deux    person- 

cependant  a  la  s^parer  de  sa  cause  nages '  on  Shrove  Tuesday  in  Lor- 

premiere  et   a  la  reproduire  pour  raine  {Romania,  ix.  568). 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  189 

about  the  church  of  St.  Elined,  near  Brecknock  on  the  Gwyl 
Awst,  in  which  the  ordinary  operations  of  the  village  life,  such 
as  ploughing,  sewing,  spinning  were  mimetically  represented  *. 
Such  dances  seem  to  survive  in  some  of  the  rondes  or  'singing-  * 
games,'  so  frequently  dramatic,  of  children  2.  On  the  whole,  / 
perhaps,  these  connect  themselves  rather  with  the  domestic" 
than  with  the  strictly  agricultural  element  in  village  cult. 
A  large  proportion  of  them  are  concerned  with  marriage. 
But  the  domestic  and  the  agricultural  Cannot  be  altogether 
dissociated.  The  game  of  Nuts  in  May,'  for  instance,  seems 
to  have  as  its  kernel  a  reminiscence  of  marriage  by  capture  ; 
but  the  '  nuts  '  or  rather '  knots '  or '  posies ' '  in  May  '  certainly 
suggest  a  setting  at  a  seasonal  festival.  So  too,  with  '  Round 
the  Mulberry  Bush.'  The  mimicry  here  is  of  domestic  opera- 
tions, but  the  '  bush '  recalls  the  sacred  tree,  the  natural  centre 
of  the  seasonal  dances.  The  closest  parallels  to  the  dance 
described  by  Giraldus  Cambrensis  are  to  be  found  in  the 
rondes  of  Oats  and  Beans  and  Barley '  and  '  Would  you  know 
how  doth  the  Peasant  ?  ',  in  which  the  chief,  though  not  always 
the  only,  subjects  of  mimicry  are  ploughing,  sowing  and  the 
like,  and  which  frequently  contain  a  prayer  or  aspiration  for 
the  welfare  of  the  crops  3. 

1  Giraldus  Cambrensis,  Itinera-  extractum    occandum  tanquam    in 

rium  Cambriae,  i.  2  {Opera,  R.S.  vi.  fusum    revocare  :    istam    deambu- 

32)  '  Videas  enim  hie  homines  seu  lando    productis   filis  quasi    telam 

puellas,  nunc  in  ecclesia,  nunc  in  ordiri  :    illam   sedendo  quasi    iam 

coemiterio,    nunc   in  chorea,  quae  orditam  oppositis  lanceolae  iactibus 

circa    coemiterium   cum   cantilena  et  alternis  calamistrae  cominus  icti- 

circumfertur,  subito  in  terram  cor-  bus  texere  mireris.     Demum   vero 

ruere,  et  primo  tanquam  in  extasim  intra  ecclesiam  cum  oblationibus  ad 

ductos   et   quietos  ;    deinde   statim  altare  perductos  tanquam  experrec- 

tanquam  in  phrenesim  raptos  exsi-  tos  et  ad  se  redeuntes  obstupescas.' 
lientes,    opera    quaecunque    festis  2  Cf.  p.  15 1  with  Mrs.  Gomme's 

diebus   illicite    perpetrare    consue-  Memoir     (ii.    458)    passim,     and 

verant,  tarn  manibus  quam  pedibus,  Haddon,     328.       Parallel     savage 

coram  populo  repraesentantes.    vi-  examples  are  in  Wallaschek,  216; 

deas   hunc    aratro    manus   aptare,  Hirn,  157,  259. 
ilium  quasi  stimulo  boves  excitare ;  s  Mrs.  Gomme,  ii.  399,  494  and 

et   utrumque  quasi    laborem   miti-  s.   vv.  ;     Haddon,    340.       Similar 

gando  solitas  barbarae  modulatio-  games  are  widespread  on  the  con- 

nis  voces  efiferre.   videas  hunc  artem  tinent ;  cf.  the  Rabelais  quotation  on 

sutoriam,  ilium  pellipariam  imitari.  p.   167.     Haddon  quotes  a  French 

item  videas  hanc  quasi  colum  ba-  formula,  ending 
iulando,    nunc    filum    manibus    et  '  Aveine,  aveine,  aveine, 

brachiis  in  longum  extrahere,  nunc  Que  le  Bon  Dieu  t'amene.' 


\ 


190  FOLK  DRAMA 

I  have  treated  the  mimetic  element  of  budding  drama  in  the 
agricultural  festivals  as  being  primarily  a  manifestation  of  the 
activities  of  play  determined  in  its  direction  by  the  dominant 
interests  of  the  occasion,  and  finding  its  material  in  the  debris 
of  ritual  custom  left  over  from  forgotten  stages  of  religious 
thought.  It  is  possible  also  to  hold  that  the  mimesis  is  more 
closely  interwoven  with  the  religious  and  practical  side  of  the 
festivals,  and  is  in  fact  yet  another  example  of  that  primitive 
magical  notion  of  causation  by  the  production  of  the  similar, 

* 

which  is  at  the  root  of  the  rain-  and  sun-charms.  Certainly 
the  village  dramas,  like  the  other  ceremonies  which  they 
accompany,  are  often  regarded  as  influencing  the  luck  of  the 
farmer's  year  ;  just  as  the  hunting-  and  war-dances  of  savages 
are  often  regarded  not  merely  as  amusement  or  as  practice  for 
actual  war  and  hunting,  but  as  charms  to  secure  success  in 
these  pursuits1.  But  it  does  not  seem  clear  to  me  that  in  this 
case  the  magical  efficacy  belongs  to  the  drama  from  the 
beginning,  and  I  incline  to  look  upon  it  as  merely  part  of 
the  sanctity  of  the  feast  as  a  whole,  which  has  attached  itself 
in  the  course  of  time  even  to  that  side  of  it  which  began  as  play. 
The  evolution  of  folk-drama  out  of  folk-dance  may  be  most 
completely  studied  through  a  comparison  of  the  various  types 
of  European  sword-dance  with  the  so-called  '  mummers',' 
'  guisers'/  or  '  Pace  -  eggers' '  play  of  Saint  George.  The 
history  of  the  sword-dance  has  received  a  good  deal  of  atten- 
tion from  German  archaeologists,  who,  however,  perhaps  from 
imperfect  acquaintance  with  the  English  data,  have  stopped 
short  of  the  affiliation  to  it  of  the  play 2.  The  dance  itself 
can  boast  a  hoar  antiquity.  Tacitus  describes  it  as  the  one 
form  of  spectaculurn  to  be  seen  at  the  gatherings  of  the 
Germans  with  whom  he  was  conversant.  The  dancers  were 
young  men  who  leapt  with  much  agility  amongst  menacing 

1  Wallaschek,  273  ;  Hirn,  285.  schichte  des  Tanzes  in  Deutschland 

2  The  German  data  here  used  are  (1 886) ;  Sepp,  Die  Religion  der  alten 
chiefly  collected  by  Miillenhofif  and  Detitschen,  und  ihr  Fortbe stand  in 
F.  A.  Mayer  ;  cf.  also  Creizenach,  Volkssagen,  Aufziigen  tind  Fest- 
i.  408  ;  Michels,  84  ;  J.  J.  Ammann,  brauchen  bis  zur  Gegenwart  (1890), 
Nachtrdge  zic7n  Schwerttanz,  in  91 ;  OWittstock,UeberdenSchwerl- 
Z.  f.  d.  Alterthum  xxxiv  (1890),  tanz  der  Siebenbiirger  Sachscn,  in 
178;  A.  Hartmann,  Volksschauspiele  Philologische  Studien  :  Festgabe 
(1880),   130;   F.  M.   Bohme,    Ge-  fur  Eduard  Sievers  (1896),  349. 


THE  SWORD-DANCE 


191 


spear-points  and  sword-blades  *.  Some  centuries  later  the 
use  of  sweorda-gelac  as  a  metaphor  for  battle  in  Beowulf 
shows  that  the  term  was  known  to  the  continental  ancestors 
of  the  Anglo-Saxons2.  Then  follows  a  long  gap  in  the 
record,  bridged  only  by  a  doubtful  reference  in  an  eighth- 
century  Frankish  homily 3,  and  a  possible  representation 
in  a  ninth-century  Latin  and  Anglo-Saxon  manuscript4. 
The  minstrels  seem  to  have  adopted  the  sword-dance  into 
their  repertory5,  but  the  earliest  mediaeval  notice  of  it  as 
a  popular  Indus  is  at  Nuremberg  in  1350.  From  that  date 
onwards  until  quite  recent  years  it  crops  up  frequently,  alike 
at  Shrovetide,  Christmas  and  other  folk  festivals,  and  as 
an  element  in  the  revels  at  weddings,  royal  entries,  and  the 
like 6.  It  is  fairly  widespread  throughout  Germany.  It  is 
found  in  Italy,  where  it  is  called  the  mattaccino1 ,  and  in  Spain 
{matachin),  and  under  this  name  or  that  of  the  dansedes  bouffons 
it  was  known  both  in  France  and  England  at  the  Renaissance 8. 
It  is  given  by  Paradin  in  his  Le  Blason  des  Danses  and,  with 
the  music  and  cuts  of  the  performers,  by  Tabourot  in  his 
Orche'sographie  (1588) 9.  These  are  the  sophisticated  versions 
of  courtly  halls.  But  about  the  same  date  Olaus  Magnus 
describes  it  as  a  folk-dance,  to  the  accompaniment  of  pipes  or 
cantilenae,  in  Sweden 10.     In  England,  the  main  area  of  the 


1  Tacitus,  Germania,  24  '  genus 
spectaculorum  unum  atque  in  omni 
coetu  idem,  nudi  iuvenes,  quibus  id 
ludicrum  est,  inter  gladios  se  atque 
infestas  frameas  saltu  iaciunt.  exer- 
citatio  artem  paravit,  ars  decorem, 
non  in  quaestum  tamen  aut  merce- 
dem  ;  quamvis  audacis  lasciviae 
pretium  est  voluptas  spectantium.' 

2  Beowulf,  1042.  It  is  in  the 
hall  of  Hrothgar  at  Heorot, 

1  baet    waes    hilde  -  setl  :     heah- 
cyninges, 
bonne    sweorda  -  gelac  :     sunu 

Healfdenes 
efnan  wolde  :  n£fre  on  ore  l£g 
wid- cubes  wfg  :     ponne    walu 
feollon.' 
8  Appendix  N,  no.  xxxix ;  '  arma 
in  campo  ostendit.' 

*  Strutt,  215.  The  tenth-century 
to  yoT&KoV  at  Byzantium  seems  to 


have  been  a  kind  of  sword-dance 
(cf.  ch.  xii  ad  fin.'). 
6  Strutt,  260 ;  Du  Meril,  La  Com. 

84. 

6  Mayer,  259. 

7  Mullenhoff,  ■  145,  quoting  Don 
Quixote,  ii.  20 ;  Z.f.  d.  A.  xviii.  1 1  ; 
Du  Me'ril,  La  Com.  86. 

8  Webster,  The  White  Devil,  v. 
6,  'a  matachin,  it  seems  by  your 
drawn  swords '  ;  the  '  buffons  '  is 
included  in  the  list  of  dances  in  the 
Compiaynt  of  Scotland  (t  1548) ; 
cf.  Furnivall,  Laneham's  Letter, 
clxii. 

9  Tabourot,  Orche'sographie,  97, 
Les  Bouffons  ou  Mattachins.  The 
dancers  held  bucklers  and  swords 
which  they  clashed  together.  They 
also  wore  bells  on  their  legs. 

10  Cf.  Appendix  J. 


192  FOLK  DRAMA 

acknowledged  sword-dance  is  in  the  north.  It  is  found, 
according  to  Mr.  Henderson,  from  the  Humber  to  the 
Cheviots ;  and  it  extends  as  far  south  as  Cheshire  and 
Nottinghamshire 1.  Outlying  examples  are  recorded  from 
Winchester 2  and  from  Devonshire 3.  In  Scotland  Sir  Walter 
Scott  found  it  among  the  farthest  Hebrides,  and  it  has  also 
been  traced  in  Fifeshire4. 

» 

The  name  of  danse  des  bouffons  sometimes  given  to  the 
sword-dance  may  be  explained  by  a  very  constant  feature  of 
the  English  examples,  in  which  the  dancers  generally  include 
or  are  accompanied  by  one  or  more  comic  or  grotesque  person- 
ages. The  types  of  these  grotesques  are  not  kept  very 
distinct  in  the  descriptions,  or,  probably,  in  fact.  But  they 
appear  to  be  fundamentally  two.  There  is  the  '  Tommy '  or 
'  fool,'  who  wears  the  skin  and  tail  of  a  fox  or  some  other 
animal,  and  there  is  the  '  Bessy,' who  is  a  man  dressed  in 
a  woman's  clothes.  And  they  can  be  paralleled  from  outside 
England.  A  Narr  or  Fasching  (carnival  fool)  is  a  figure  in 
several  German  sword-dances,  and  in  one  from  Bohemia  he 
has  his  female  counterpart  in  a  Mehlweib  6. 

With  the  cantilenae  noticed  by  Olaus  Magnus  may  be  com- 
pared the  sets  of  verses  with  which  several  modern  sword- 
dances,  both  in  these  islands  and  in  Germany,  are  provided. 

v  They  are  sung  before  or  during  part  of  the  dances,  and  as 
\  a  rule  are  little  more  than  an  introduction  of  the  performers, 

/  to  whom  they  give  distinctive  names.     If  they  contain  any 

1  Henderson,   67.      The  sword-  Plough  Monday.    The  figures  in- 

dance   is    also    mentioned   by  W.  eluded  the  placing  of  a  hexagon  or 

Hutchinson,   A    View    of   North-  rose  of  swords  on  the  head  of  one 

umberland  (1778),  ii  ad  fin.  18-,  by  of  the  performers.     The  dance  was 

J.  Wallis,  Hist,  of  Northumberland  accompanied  with  '  Toms  or  downs' 

(1779),   ii.   28,  who   describes   the  masked  or  painted,  and  '  Madgies 

leader  as    having    'a    fox's    skin,  or  Madgy- Pegs 'in  women's  clothes, 

generally  serving  him  for  a  cover-  Sometimes   a  farce,   with   a  king, 

ing  and  ornament  to  his  head,  the  miller,  clown  and  doctor  was  added 

tail  hanging  down  his  back  ' ;  and  (G.  Young,  Hist,  of  Whitby  (1817), 

as  practised  in  the  north  Riding  of  ii.  880). 

Yorks.  by  a  writer  in  the  Gentle-  2  Cf.  Appendix  J. 

man's  Magazine  (181  i),lxxxi.  1.423.  3  R.  Bell,  Ancient  Poems,  Bal- 

Here  it  took  place  from   St.  Ste-  lads  and  Songs  of  the  Peasantry  of 

phen's  to  New  Year's  Day.     There  England,  175. 

were  six  lads,  a  fiddler,  Bessy  and  *  Cf.  Appendix  J. 

a  Doctor.     At  Whitby,  six  dancers  6  Mayer,  230,  417. 
went  with  the  'Plough  Stots'  on 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  193 

incident,  it  is  generally  of  the  nature  of  a  quarrel,  in  which 
one  of  the  dancers  or  one  of  the  grotesques  is  killed.  To 
this  point  it  will  be  necessary  to  return.  The  names  given 
to  the  characters  are  sometimes  extremely  nondescript;  some- 
times, under  a  more  or  less  literary  influence,  of  an  heroic 
order.  Here  and  there  a  touch  of  something  more  primitive 
may  be  detected.  Five  sets  of  verses  from  the  north  of 
England  are  available  in  print.  Two  of  these  are  of  Durham 
provenance.  One,  from  Houghton-le-Spring,  has,  besides  the 
skin-clad  '  Tommy '  and  the  '  Bessy,'  five  dancers.  These 
are  King  George,  a  Squire's  Son  also  called  AHck  or  Alex, 
a  King  of  Sicily,  Little  Foxey,  and  a  Pitman  \  The  other 
Durham  version  has  a  captain  called  True  Blue,  a  Squire's  Son, 
Mr.  Snip  a  tailor,  a  Prodigal  Son  (replaced  in  later  years  by 
a  Sailor),  a  Skipper,  a  Jolly  Dog.  There  is  only  one  clown, 
who  calls  himself  a  '  fool/ and  acts  as  treasurer.  He  is  named 
Bessy,  but  wears  a  hairy  cap  with  a  fox's  brush  pendent 2. 
Two  other  versions  come  from  Yorkshire.  At  Wharfdale 
there  are  seven  dancers,  Thomas  the  clown,  his  son  Tom, 
Captain  Brown,  Obadiah  Trim  a  tailor,  a  Foppish  Knight, 
Love-ale  a  vintner,  and  Bridget  the  clown's  wife 3.  At 
Linton  in  Craven  there  are  five,  the  clown,  Nelson,  Jack  Tar, 
Tosspot,  and  Miser  a  woman4.  The  fifth  version  is  of 
unnamed  locality.  It  has  two  clowns,  Tommy  in  skin  and 
tail,  and  Bessy,  and  amongst  the  dancers  are  a  Squire's  Son 

•  1  Henderson,    67.      The    clown  into  a  fight.     Bell  mentions  a  simi- 

introduces    each   dancer    in  turn  ;  lar  set  of  verses  from  Devonshire, 

then  there  is  a  dance  with  raised  3  Bell,  172.     A  Christmas  dance, 

swords  which  are  tied  in  a  '  knot.'  The  clown  makes  the  preliminary 

Henderson  speaks  of  a  later  set  of  circle  with  his  sword,  and  calls  on 

verses  also  in  use,  which  he  does  the  other  dancers, 

not  print.  *  Bell,  j8i.     The  clown  calls  for 

2  R.  Bell,  Ancient  Poems,  Bal-  'a  room,' after  which  one  of  the  party 

lads  and  Songs  of  the  Peasantry  of  introduces  the  rest.     This  also  is  a 

England,  ij$  (from  Sir  C.  Sharpe's  Christmas  dacce,  but  as  the  words 

Bishopritk  Garland).    A  Christmas  '  we've  come  a  pace-egging  '  occur, 

dance.      The    captain    began    the  it  must  have  been  transferred  from 

performance   by  drawing  a   circle  Easter.    Bell  says  that  a  somewhat 

with  his  sword.     Then  the  Bessy  similar    performance    is    given    at 

introduced  the  captain,  who  called  Easter  in  Coniston,  and  Halliwell, 

on  the  rest  in  turn,  each  walking  Popular    Rhymes     and    Nursery 

round  the  circle  to   music.     Then  Tales,  244,  describes  a  similar  set  of 

came  an  elaborate  dance  with  care-  rhymes  as  used  near  York  for  pace- 

ful  formations,  which  degenerated  egging. 

CHAMBERS.     1  O 


194  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  a  Tailor1.  Such  a  nomenclature  will  not  repay  much 
analysis.  The  '  Squire,'  whose  son  figures  amongst  the 
dancers,  is  identical  with  the  '  Tommy,'  although  why  he 
should  have  a  son  I  do  not  know.  Similarly,  the  '  Bridget ' 
at  Wharfdale  and  the  '  Miser '  at  Linton  correspond  to  the 
'Bessy'  who  appears  elsewhere. 

The  Shetland  dance,  so  far  as  the  names  go,  is  far  more 
literary  and  less  of  a  folk  affair  than  any  of  the  English 
examples.  The  grotesques  are  absent  altogether,  and  the 
dancers  belong  wholly  to  that  heroic  category  which  is  also 
represented  in  a  degenerate  form  at  Houghton-le-Spring. 
They  are  in  fact  those  '  seven  champions  of  Christendom  '— 
St.  George  of  England,  St.  James  of  Spain,  St.  Denys  of 
France,  St.  David  of  Wales,  St.  Patrick  of  Ireland,  St.  Anthony 
of  Italy,  and  St.  Andrew  of  Scotland — whose  legends  were  first 
brought  together  under  that  designation  by  Richard  Johnson 
in  1596 2. 

Precisely  the  same  divergence  between  a  popular  and 
a  literary  or  heroic  type  of  nomenclature  presents  itself  in 
such  of  the  German  sword-dance  rhymes  as  are  in  print. 
Three  very  similar  versions  from  Styria,  Hungary,  and  Bohemia 
are  traceable  to  a  common  '  Austro-Bavarian '  archetype 3. 
The  names  of  these,  so  far  as  they  are  intelligible  at  all, 
appear  to  be  due  to  the  village  imagination,  working  perhaps 
in  one  or  two  instances,  such  as  *  Grunwald '  or  '  Wilder 
Waldmann,' upon  stock  figures  of  the  folk  festivals4.  It  is 
the  heroic  element,  however,  which  predominates  in  the  two 
other  sets  of  verses  which  are  available.  One  is  from  the 
Clausthal  in  the  Harz  mountains,  and  here  the  dancers 
represent  the  five  kings  of  England,  Saxony,  Poland,  Den- 
mark, and  Moorland,  together  with  a  serving-man,  Hans,  and 
one   Schnortison,  who  acts  as   leader   and   treasurer  of  the 

1  Described  by  Miillenhoff,  138,  Styrian  verses:  they  are  Obersteiner 

from  Ausland  (1857),  No.  4,  f.  81.  (the    Vortdnzer)   or    Hans    Kanix, 

The  clown  gives  the  prologue,  and  Fasching  (the  Narr),  Obermayer, 

introduces  the  rest.  Jungesgsell,  Grunwald,   Edlesblut, 

*  Cf.  p.  221.  Springesklee,  Schellerfriedl,  Wilder 

3  Mayer  prints  and  compares  all  Waldmann,     Handssupp,     Ruben- 
three  texts.  dunst,  Leberdarm,  Rotwein,  Hofen- 

4  Cf.  p.  185.    The  original  names  streit. 
seem  to  be  best  preserved  in  the 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  195 

party1.  In  the  other,  from  Liibeck,  the  dancers  are  the 
'  worthies '  Kaiser  Karl,  Josua,  Hector,  David,  Alexander, 
and  Judas  Maccabaeus.  They  fight  with  one  Sterkader,  in 
whom  Mullenhoff  finds  the  Danish  hero  Stercatherus  men- 
tioned by  Saxo  Grammaticus  ;  and  to  the  Hans  of  the 
Clausthal  corresponds  a  Klas  Rugebart,  who  seems  to  be 
the  red-bearded  St.  Nicholas2. 

In  view  of  the  wide  range  of  the  sword-dance  in  Germany, 
I  do  not  think  it  is  necessary  to  attach  any  importance  to  the 
theories  advanced  by  Sir  Walter  Scott  and  others  that  it  is, 
in  England  and  Scotland,  of  Scandinavian  origin.  It  is  true 
that  it  appears  to  be  found  mainly  in  those  parts  of  these 
islands  where  the  influence  of  Danes  and  Northmen  may 
be  conjectured  to  have  been  strongest.  But  I  believe  that 
this  is  a  matter  of  appearance  merely,  and  that  a  type  of  folk- 
dance  far  more  widely  spread  in  the  south  of  England  than 
the  sword-dance  proper, Js  really  identical  wTtrTTE  This  is 
the  morris-dance,  the  chief  characteristic  of  which  is  that  the 
performers  wear  bells  which  jingle  at  every  step.  Judging 
by  the  evidence  of  account-books,  as  well  as  by  the  allusions 
of  contemporary  writers,  the  morris  was  remarkably  popular 
in  the  sixteenth  and  seventeenth  centuries  3.  Frequently,  but 
by  no  means  always,  it  is  mentioned  in  company  with  the 
May-game 4.  In  a  certain  painted  window  at  Betley  in 
Staffordshire  are  represented  six  morris-dancers,  together 
with  a  Maypole,  a  musician,  a  fool,  a  crowned  man  on 
a  hobby-horse,  a  crowned  lady  with  a  pink  in  her  hand, 
and  a  friar.  The  last  three  may  reasonably  be  regarded  as 
Robin  Hood,  Maid  Marian,  and  Friar  Tuck  5.     The  closeness 

1  H.  Prohle,  Weltliche  unci geist-  shown  before  Elizabeth  at  Kenil- 
liche  Volkslieder  und  Volksschau-  worth  'a  lively  morrisdauns,  accord- 
spi'ele  (1855),  245.  ing  too  the  auncient  manner:   six 

2  Mullenhoff,  Z.f,  d.  A.  xx.  10.         daunserz,    Mawdmarion,    and    the 
8  Brand-Ellis,    i.    142  ;    Douce,      fool.' 

576;     Burton,   95;     Gutch,   Robin  6  A  good  engraving  of  the  window 

Hood,  i.  301  ;  Drake,  76.  is  in    Variorum   Shakespeare,  xvi. 

4  Burton,  117;  Warner,  A  //don's  419,   and   small    reproductions    in 

England,  v.  25  'At   Paske  begun  Brand,  i.  145  ;  Burton,  103  ;  Gutch, 

our  Morrise,  and  ere  Penticost  our  i.  349;  Mr.  Toilet's  own  account  of 

May.'      The   morris   was    familiar  the  window,  printed  in  the   Vario- 

in  the  revels  of  Christmas.     Lane-  rum,  loc.  cit.,  is  interesting,  but  too 

ham.,  23,  describes  at  the  Bride-ale  ingenious.     He  dates  the   window 

O  2, 


196  FOLK  DRAMA 

of  the  relation  between  the  morris-dance  and  the  May-game 
is,  however,  often  exaggerated.  The  Betley  figures  only 
accompany  the  morris-dance  ;  they  do  not  themselves  wear 
the  bells.  And  besides  the  window,  the  only  trace  of  evidence 
that  any  member  of  the  Robin  Hood  cortege,  with  the  excep- 
tion of  Maid  Marian,  was  essential  to  the  morris-dance,  is 
a  passage  in  a  masque  of  Ben  Jonson's,  which  so  seems  to 
regard  the  friar1.  The  fact  is  that  the  morris-dance  was 
a  great  deal  older,  as  an  element  in  the  May-game,  than 
Robin  Hood,  and  that  when  Robin  Hood's  name  was  for- 
gotten in  this  connexion,  the  morris-dance  continued  to  be  in 
vogue,  not  at  May-games  only,  but  at  every  form  of  rustic 
merry-making.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  true  that  the  actual 
dancers  were  generally  accompanied  by  grotesque  personages, 
and  that  one  of  these  was  a  woman,  or  a  man  dressed  in 
woman's  clothes,  to  whom  literary  writers  at  least  continued 
to  give  the  name  of  Maid  Marian.  The  others  have  nothing 
whatever  to  do  with  Robin  Hood.  They  were  a  clown  or 
fool,  and  a  hobby-horse,  who,  if  the  evidence  of  an  Elizabethan 
song  ^an  be  trusted,  was  already  beginning  to  go  out  of 
fashion 2.     A  rarer  feature  was  a  dragon,  and  it  is  possible 

in  the  reign  of  Henry  VIII;  Douce,  schoolmaster  : 

585,  a  better  authority,  ascribes  it  '  I  first  appear  .  .  . 

to  that  of  Edward  IV.  The  next,  the  Lord  of  May  and 

1  Ben  Jonson,  The  Gipsies  Meta-  Lady  bright, 

tnorphosed    (ed,    Cunningham,   iii.  The  Chambermaid  and  Serving- 

15  0  :  man,  by  night 

'  Clod.   They  should   be  morris-  That  seek  out  silent  hanging : 

dancers  by  their  gingle,  but  they  then  mine  Host 

have  no  napkins.  And  his  fat  Spouse,  that  wel- 

iCockrel.  No,  nor  a  hobby-horse.  comes  to  their  cost 

'Clod.   Oh,  he's  often  forgotten,  The  galled  traveller,  and  with  a 

that's  no  rule ;  but  there  is  no  Maid  beck'ning 

Marian  nor  Friar  amongst   them,  Informs  the  tapster  to   inflame 

which  is  the  surer  mark.  the  reck'ning  : 

'  Cockrel.  Nor  a  fool  that  I  see. '  Then   the   beast-eating   Clown, 

2  The  lady,  the  fool,  the  hobby-  and  next  the  Fool, 

horse   are   all  in  Toilet's   window,  The  Bavian,  with  long  tail  and 

and  in  a  seventeenth-century  print-  eke  long  tool ; 

ing    by   Vinkenboom    from    Rich-  Cum  multis  aliis,  that  make  a 

mond  palace,  engraved  by  Douce,  dance.' 

598 ;    Burton,    105.      Cf.   the   last  Evidently  some  of  these  dramatis 

note  and  other  passages  quoted  by  personae  are   not   traditional;   the 

Douce,    Brand,    and    Burton.     In  ingenuity  of  the  presenter  has  been 

Two  Noble  Kinsmen,  iii.  5,  125,  a  at  work  on  them.     '  Bavian  '  as  a 

morris  of  six  men  and  six  women  name   for  the  fool,    is   the  Dutch 

is  thus  presented  by  Gerrold,  -the  •  baviaan,  'baboon.'    His  'tail'  is  to 


THE  SWORD-DANCE 


197 


that,  when  there  was  a  dragon,  the  rider  of  the  hobby-horse 
was  supposed  to  personate  St.  George  l.  The  morris-dance 
is  by  no  means  extinct,  especially  in  the  north  and  midlands. 
Accounts  of  it  are  available  from  Lancashire  and  Cheshire  2, 
Derbyshire  3,    Shropshire  4,     Leicestershire 5,    and     Oxford- 


be  noted ;  for  the  phallic  shape 
sometimes  given  to  the  bladder 
which  he  carries,  cf.  Rigollot,  164. 
In  the  Betley  window  the  fool  has 
a  bauble ;  in  the  Vinkenboom  pic- 
ture a  staff  with  a  bladder  at  one 
end,  and  a  ladle  (to  gather  money 
in)  at  the  other.  In  the  window 
the  ladle  is  carried  by  the  hobby- 
horse. '  The  hobby-horse  is  forgot ' 
is  a  phrase  occurring  in  L.  L.  L.  iii. 
I.  30 ;  Hamlet,  iii.  2.  144,  and 
alluded  to  by  Beaumont  and 
Fletcher,  Women  Pleased,  iv.  I, 
and  Ben  Jonson,  in  the  masque 
quoted  above,  and  in  The  Satyr 
(Cunningham,  ii.  577).  Apparently 
it  is  a  line  from  a  lost  ballad. 

1  Stubbes,  i.  147,  of  the  'devil's 
daunce '  in  the  train  of  the  lord  of 
misrule,  evidently  a  morris,  '  then 
haue  they  their  Hobby-horses, 
dragons  &  other  Antiques.'  In 
VV.  Sampson's  Vow-breaker  (1636), 
one  morris-dancer  says  '  I'll  be  a 
fiery  dragon';  another,  'I'll  be 
a  thund'ring  Saint  George  as  ever 
rode  on  horseback.' 

2  Burton,  40,  43,  48,  49,  56,  59, 
61,  65,  69,  75,  115,  117,  121,  123, 
cites  many  notices  throughout  the 
century,  and  gives  several  figures. 
The  morris  is  in  request  at  wakes 
and  rushbearings.  Both  men  and 
women  dance,  sometimes  to  the 
number  of  twenty  or  thirty.  Gay 
dresses  are  worn,  with  white  skirts, 
knee-breeches  and  ribbons.  Hand- 
kerchiefs are  carried  or  hung  on 
the  arm  or  wrist,  or  replaced  by 
dangling  streamers,  cords,  or 
skeins  of  cotton.  Bells  are  not 
worn  on  the  legs,  but  jingling  horse- 
collars  are  sometimes  carried  on 
the  body.  There  is  generally  a  fool, 
described  in  one  account  as  wearing 
'a  horrid  mask.'  He  is,  however, 
generally  black,  and  is  known  as 


'King  Coffee'  (Gorton),  'owd  sooty- 
face,'  '  dirty  Bet,'  and  '  owd  molly- 
coddle.' This  last  name,  like  the 
'  molly-dancers  '  of  Gorton,  seems 
to  be  due  to  a  linguistic  corruption. 
In  1829  a  writer  describes  the  fool 
as  '  a  nondescript,  made  up  of  the 
ancient  fool  and  Maid  Marian.'  At 
Heaton,  in  1830,  were  two  figures, 
said  to  represent  Adam  and  Eve, 
as  well  as  the  fool.  The  masked 
fool,  mentioned  above,  had  as  com- 
panion a  shepherdess  with  lamb 
and  crook. 

8  Burton,  115,  from  Journal  of 
Archaeol.  Assoc,  vii.  201.  The 
dancers  went  on  Twelfth-night, 
without  bells,  but  with  a  fool,  a 
'  fool's  wife '  and  sometimes  a 
hobby-horse. 

4  Jackson  and  Burne,  402,  410, 
477.  The  morris-dance  proper  is 
mainly  in  south  Shropshire  and  at 
Christmas.  At  Shrewsbury,  in 
1885,  were  ten  dancers,  with  a  fool. 
Five  carried  trowels  and  five  short 
staves  which  they  clashed.  The 
fool  had  a  black  face,  and  a  bell  on 
his  coat.  No  other  bells  are  men- 
tioned. Staves  or  wooden  swords 
are  used  at  other  places  in  Shrop- 
shire, and  at  Brosely  all  the  faces 
are  black.  The  traditional  music 
is  a  tabor  and  pipe.  A  1652  ac- 
count of  the  Brosely  dance  with 
six  sword-bearers,  a  '  leader  or  lord 
of  misrule '  and  a  '  vice '  (cf.  ch. 
xxv)  called  the  '  lord's  son '  is 
quoted.  In  north-east  Shropshire, 
the  Christmas  '  guisers '  are  often 
called  '  morris-dancers,'  '  murry- 
dancers,'  or  '  merry-dancers.'  In 
Shetland  the  name  'merry  dancers' 
is  given  to  the  aurora  borealis 
(J.  Spence,  Shetland  Folk-Lore, 
116). 

8  Leicester  F.  L.  93.  The  dance 
was  on  Plough  Monday  with  paper 


198 


FOLK  DRAMA 


shire 1 ;  and  there  are  many  other  counties  in  which  it  makes,  or 
has  recently  made,  an  appearance  2.  The  hobby-horse,  it  would 
seem,  is  now  at  last,  except  in  Derbyshire,  finally  '  forgot '  ; 
but  the  two  other  traditional  grotesques  are  still  de  rigneur. 
Few  morris-dances  are  complete  without  the  '  fool '  or  clown, 
amongst  whose  various  names  that  of  '  squire  '  in  Oxfordshire 
and  that  of 'dirty  Bet'  in  Lancashire  are  the  most  interesting. 
The  woman  is  less  invariable.  Her  Tudor  name  of  Maid  Marian 
is  preserved  in  Leicestershire  alone  ;  elsewhere  she  appears  as 
a  shepherdess,  or  Eve,  or  'the  fool's  wife';  and  sometimes  she 
is  merged  with  the  '  fool '  into  a  single  nondescript  personage. 
The  morris-dance  is  by  no  means  confined  to  England. 
There  are  records  of  it  from  Scotland  3,  Germany  4,  Flanders 5, 
Switzerland6,  Italy7,  Spain8,  and  France9.     In  the  last-named 


masks,  a  plough,  the  bullocks,  men 
in  women's  dresses,  one  called  Maid 
Marian,  Curly  the  fool,  and  Beelze- 
bub. This  is,  I  think,  the  only 
survival  of  the  name  Maid  Marian, 
and  it  may  be  doubted  if  even 
this  is  really  popular  and  not 
literary. 

1  P.  Manning,  Oxfordshire  Sea- 
sonal Festivals,  in  F.  L.  viii.  317, 
summarizes  accounts  from  fourteen 
villages,  and  gives  illustrations. 
There  are  always  six  dancers.  A 
broad  garter  of  bells  is  worn  below 
the  knee.  There  are  two  sets  of 
figures :  in  one  handkerchiefs  are 
carried,  in  the  other  short  staves 
are  swung  and  clashed.  Some- 
times the  dancers  sing  to  the  air, 
which  is  that  of  an  old  country- 
dance.  There  is  always  a  fool,  who 
carries  a  stick  with  a  bladder  and 
cow's  tail,  and  is  called  in  two 
places  '  Rodney,'  elsewhere  the 
'  squire.'  The  music  is  that  of  a 
pipe  and  tabor  ('whittle'  and  'dub') 
played  by  one  man ;  a  fiddle  is  now 
often  used.  At  Bampton  there  was 
a  solo  dance  between  crossed 
tobacco-pipes.  At  Spelsbury  and 
at  Chipping  Warden  the  dance  used 
to  be  on  the  church-tower.  At  the 
Bampton  Whit-feast  and  the  Duck- 
lington  Whit-hunt,  the  dancers 
were  accompanied  by  a  sword- 
bearer,   who  impaled  a  cake.     A 


sword-bearer  also  appears  in  a  list 
of  Finstock  dancers,  given  me  by 
Mr.  T.  J.  Carter,  of  Oxford.  He 
also  told  me  that  the  dance  on 
Spelsbury  church-tower,  seventy 
years  ago,  was  by  women. 

2  Norfolk,  Monmouthshire,  Berk- 
shire (Douce,  606) ;  Worcester- 
shire, Northamptonshire,  Glouces- 
tershire, Somersetshire,  Wiltshire, 
Warwickshire,  and  around  London 
(Burton,  114). 

3  L.  H.  T.  Accounts,  ii.  414  ;    iii. 

359,  381. 

4  Pfannenschmidt,  582;  Michels, 
84;  Creizenach,  i.  411.  Burton, 
102,  reproduces,  from  Art  Journal 
(1885),  121,  cuts  of  ten  morris- 
dancers  carved  in  wood  at  Munich 
by  Erasmus  Schnitzer  in  1480. 

5  Douce,  585,  and  Burton,  97, 
reproduce  Israel  von  Mecheln's 
engraving  (fi47o)  of  a  morris  with 
a  fool  and  a  lady. 

6  Coquillart,c2sw'Z/r<?.y(tl47o),  127. 

7  Memoires  de  Petrarque,  ii.  app. 
3,  9  ;  Petrarch  danced  '  en  pour- 
point  une  belle  et  vigoureuse  mo- 
resque  '  to  please  the  Roman  ladies 
on  the  night  of  his  coronation. 

8  Somers  Tracts,  ii.  81,  87.  The 
Earl  of  Nottingham,  when  on  an 
embassy  from  James  I, saw  morrice- 
dancers  in  a  Corpus  Christi  pro- 
cession. 

9  Douce,  480 ;    Favine,  Theater 


THE  SWORD-DANCE 


199 


country  Tabourot  described  it  about  1588  under  the  name 
of  morisqne  1i  and  the  earlier  English  writers  call  it  the 
morisce,  morisk,  or  morisco2.  This  seems  to  imply  a  deriva- 
tion of  the  name  at  least  from  the  Spanish  morisco,  a  Moor. 
The  dance  itself  has  consequently  been  held  to  be  of  Moorish 
origin,  and  the  habit  of  blackening  the  face  has  been  con- 
sidered as  a  proof  of  this  3.  Such  a  theory  seems  to  invert 
the  order  of  facts.  The  dance  is  too  closely  bound  up  with 
English  village  custom  to  be  lightly  regarded  as  a  foreign 
importation  ;  and  I  would  suggest  that  the  faces  were  not 
blackened,  because  the  dancers  represented  Moors,  but  rather 
the  dancers  were  thought  to  represent  Moors,  because  their 
faces  were  blackened.  The  blackened^  face  is  common 
enough  in  theyillage^Jestival.  Hence,  as  we  have  seen, 
May-day  became  proper  to  the  chimney-sweeps,  and  we  have 
found  a  conjectural  reason  for  the  disguise  in  the  primitive 
custom  of  smearing  the  face  with  the  beneficent  ashes  of  the 
festival  fire  4.  Blackened  faces  are  known  in  the  sword-dance 
as  well  asJajthe  morns-dance  6.;  and  there  are  other  reasons 
which  make  it  probable  that  the  two  are  only  variants  of  the 


of  Honor,  345  :  at  a  feast  given  by 
Gaston  de  Foix  at  Vendome,  in 
1458,  '  foure  young  laddes  and 
a  damosell,  attired  like  savages, 
daunced  (by  good  direction)  an 
excellent  Morisco,  before  the  as- 
sembly.' 

1  Tabourot,  Orche'sographie ,  94: 
in  his  youth  a  lad  used  to  come 
after  supper,  with  his  face  black- 
ened, his  forehead  bound  with 
white  or  yellow  taffeta,  and  bells 
on  his  legs,  and  dance  the  morris 
up  and  down  the  hall. 

2  Douce,  577  ;  Burton,  95. 

*  A  dance  certainly  of  Moorish 
origin  is  the  fandango,  in  which 
castanets  were  used  ;  cf.  the  comedy 
of  Variety  (1649)  'like  a  Baccha- 
nalian, dancing  the  Spanish  Morisco, 
with  knackers  at  his  fingers'  (Strutt, 
223).  This,  however,  seems  to  show 
that  the  fandango  was  considered 
a  variety  of  morisco.  Douce,  602  ; 
Burton,  1 24,  figure  an  African  woman 
from  Fez  dancing  with  bells  on  her 
ankles.     This  is  taken  from  Hans 


Weigel's  book  of  national  costumes 
published  at  Nuremberg  in  1577. 

4  Tabourot's  morris-dancing  boy 
had  his  face  blackened,  and  Junius 
(F.  Du  Jon),  Etymologicum  Angli- 
canum  (1743),  says  of  England 
'faciemplerumque  inficiunt  fuligine, 
et  peregrinum  vestium  cultum  as- 
sumunt,  qui  ludicris  talibus  indul- 
gent, ut  Mauri  esse  videantur,  aut 
e  longius  remota  patria  credantur 
advolasse,  atque  insolens  recrea- 
tionis  genus  ad  vexisse.'  \viSpousalls 
of  Princess  Mary  ( 1 508)  '  morisks ' 
is  rendered  '  ludi  Maurei  quas 
morescas  dicunt.'  In  the  modern 
morris  the  black  element  is  repre- 
sented, except  at  Brosely,  chiefly  by 
'owd  sooty  face,'  the  fool :  in  Leices- 
tershire it  gives  rise  to  a  distinct 
figure,  Beelzebub. 

6  Du  Meril,  La  Com.  89,  quotes 
a  sixteenth-century  French  sword- 
dance  of  *  Mores,  Sauvages,  et 
Satyres.'  In  parts  of  Yorkshire  the 
sword-dancers  had  black  faces  or 
masks  (Henderson,  70). 


200  FOLK  DRAMA 

same  performance.  Tabourot,  it  is  true,  distinguishes  les 
boujfons,  or  the  sword-dance,  and  le  morisque ;  but  then 
Tabourot  is  dealing  with  the  sophisticated  versions  of 
the  folk-dances  used  in  society,  and  Cotgrave,  translating 
les  bujfons,  can  find  no  better  English  term  than  morris  for 
the  purpose l.  The  two  dances  appear  at  the  same  festivals, 
and  they  have  the  same  grotesques  ;  for  the  Tommy  and 
Bessy  of  the  English  sword-dance,  who  occasionally  merge  in 
one,  are  obviously  identical  with  the  Maid  Marian  and  the 
'fool'of  the  morris-dance,  who  also  nowadays  similarly  coalesce. 
There  are  traces,  too,  of  an  association  of  the  hobby-horse 
with  the  sword-dance,  as  well  as  with  the  morris-clance 2. 
Most  conclusive  of  all,  however,  is  the  fact  that  in  Oxford- 
shire and  in  Shropshire  the  morris-dancers  still  use  swords  or 
wooden  staves  which  obviously  represent  swords,  and  that  the 
performers  of  the  elaborate  Revesby  sword-dance  or  play,  to 
be  hereafter  described,  are  called  in  the  eighteenth-century 
manuscript  '  morrice  dancers  V  I  do  not  think  that  the 
floating  handkerchiefs  of  the  morris-dance  are  found  in  its 
congener,  nor  do  I  know  what,  if  any,  significance  they  have. 
Probably,  like  the  ribbons,  they  merely  represent  rustic 
notions  of  ornament.  Mullenhoff  lays  stress  on  the  white 
shirts  or  smocks  which  he  finds  almost  universal  in  the  sword- 
dance  4.  The  morris-dancers  are  often  described  as  dressed  in 
white ;  but  here  too,  if  the  ordinary  work-a-day  costume  is 
a  smock,  the  festal  costume  is  naturally  a  clean  white  smock. 
Finally,  there  are  the  bells.  These,  though  they  have  partially 
disappeared  in  the  north,  seem  to  be  proper  to  the  morris- 

1  Cotgrave,  '  Dancer  les  Buffons,         s  Cf.  ch.  x ;  also  Wise,  Enquiries 

To   daunce  a  morris.'     The  term  concerning  the  Inhabitants,  .  .  .  of 

'the  madman's  morris'  appears  as  Europe,  51  'the  common  people  in 

the  name  of  the  dance  in  The  Figure  many  parts  of  England  still  practise 

of  Nine   (temp.  Charles    II)  ;    cf.  what  they  call  a  Morisco  dance,  in 

Furnivall,  LanehanCs  Letter,  clxii.  a  wild  manner,  and  as  it  were  in 

The  buffon  is  presumably  the  'fool' ;  armour,  at  proper  intervals  striking 

cf.    Cotgrave,    '  Buffon  :     m.       A  upon    one    another's    staves,'   &c. 

buffoon,  jeaster,  sycophant,  merrie  Johnson's   Dictionary  (1755)  calls 

fool,  sportfull  companion  :  one  that  the  morris  '  a  dance  in  which  bells 

lives  by  making  others  merrie.'  are   gingled,  or  staves  or  swords 

3  Henderson,  70.     In  Yorkshire  clashed.' 
the  sword-dancers  carried  the  image  *  Mullenhoff,    124;     cf.    Mayer, 

of  a  white  horse ;    in  Cheshire  a  236. 
horse's  head  and  skin. 


THE  SWORD-DANCE  201 

dance,  and  to  differentiate  it  from  the  sword-dance1.  But 
this  is  only~slPwhen  the  English  examples  are  alone  taken 
into  consideration,  for  Miillenhoff  quotes  one  Spanish  and 
three  German  descriptions  of  sword-dances  in  which  the  bells 
are  a  feature2.  Tabourot  affords  similar  evidence  for  the 
French  version 3 ;  while  Olaus  Magnus  supplements  his 
account  of  the  Scandinavian  sword-dance  with  one  of  a  similar 
performance,  in  which  the  swords  were  replaced  by  bows,  and 
bells  were  added  4.  The  object  of  the  bells  was  probably  to 
increase  or  preserve  the  musical  effect  of  the  clashing  swords. 
The  performers  known  to  Tacitus  were  nudi,  and  no  bells  are 
mentioned.  One  other  point  with  regard  to  the  morris-dance 
is  worth  noticing  before  we  leave  the  subject.  It  is  capable  of 
use  both  as  a  stationary  and  a  processional  dance,  and 
therefore  illustrates  both  of  the  two  types  of  dancing  motion- 
naturally  evolved  from  the  circumstances  of  the  village 
festival 5. 

Miillenhoff  regards  the  sword-dance  as  primarily  a  rhythmic 
Abbild  or  mimic  representation  of  war,  subsequently  modified 
in  character  by  use  at  the  village  feasts 6.  It  is  true  that  the 
notice  of  Tacitus  and  the  allusion  in  Beowulf  suggest  that 
it  had  a  military  character  ;  and  it  may  fairly  be  inferred  that 
it  formed  part  of  that  war-cult  from  which,  as  pointed  out  in 
a  previous  chapter,  heroic  poetry  sprang.  This  is  confirmed 
by  the  fact  that  some  at  least  of  the  dramatis  personae  of 
the  modern  dances  belong  to  the  heroic  category.  Side  by 
side  with  local  types  such  as  the  Pitman  or  the  Sailor,  and 
with  doublets  of  the  grotesques  such  as  Little  Foxey  or  the 

1  Douce,  602  ;  Barton,  123.    The  treble  bells ';  cf.  Rowley,  Witch  of 
bells   were  usually   fastened  upon  Edmonton,  i.  2. 
broad  garters,  as  they  are  still  worn         a  Miillenhoff,  123  ;  Mayer,  235. 
in    Oxfordshire.       But    they    also  s  Tabourot,  Orchisographie,^. 
appear  as  anklets  or  are  hung  on         4  Cf.  Appendix  J.   A  figure  with  a 
various  parts  of  the  dress.   In  a  cut  bow  and  arrow  occurs  in  the  Abbots 
from  Randle  Holme's  Academie  of  Bromley  horn-dance  (p.  166). 
Armorie,    iii.    109    (Douce,    603;  8  W.  Kempe's Nine  Days  Wonder 
Burton,  127),  a  morris-dancer  holds  (ed.  Dyce,  Camden  Soc.)  describes 
a  pair  of  bells  in  his  hands.   Some-  his  dancing  of  the  morris  in  bell- 
times  the  bells  were   harmonized,  shangles  from  London  to  Norwich 
In  Pasquil  and  Marforius  (1589)  in  1599. 
Penry   is    described    as   'the  fore         8  Miillenhoff,  114. 
gallant   of   the    Morrice  with   the 


202  FOLK  DRAMA 

Squire's  Son  \  appear  the  five  kings  of  the  Clausthal  dance, 
the  '  worthies '  of  the  Liibeck  dance,  and  the  '  champions  of 
Christendom  '  of  the  Shetland  dance.  These  particular  groups 
betray  a  Renaissance  rather  than  a  mediaeval  imagination ;  as 
with  the  morris-dance  of  The  Two  Noble  Kinsmen,  the  village 
schoolmaster,  Holophernes  or  another,  has  probably  been  at 
work  upon  them 2.  Some  of  the  heterogeneous  English 
dramatis  personae,  Nelson  for  instance,  testify  to  a  still  later 
origin.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Sterkader  or  Stgrcatherus 
of  the  Liibeck  dance  suggests  that  genuine  national  heroes 
were  occasionally  celebrated  in  this  fashion.  At  the  same 
time  I  do  not  believe,  with  MullenhofF,  that  the  sword-dance 
originated  in  the  war-cult  Its  essentially  agricultural 
character  seems  to  be  shown  by  the  grotesques  traditionally 
associated  with  it,  the  man  in  woman's  clothes,  the  skin  or 
tail-wearing  clown  and  the  hobby-horse,  all  of  which  seem 
to  find  their  natural  explanation  in  the  facts  of  agricultural 
worship  3.  Again,  the  dance  makes  its  appearance,  not  like 
heroic  poetry  in  general  as  part  of  the  minstrel  repertory,  but 
as  a  purely  popular  thingat  the  agricultural  festivals.  To 
these  fe^tivaJs^JJierefore,  we  may  reasonably  suppose  it  to 
have  originally  belonged,  and  to  have  been  borrowed  from 
them  by  the  young  warriors  who  danced  before  the  king. 
They,  however,  perhaps  gave  it  the  heroic  element  which,  in 

1  The    '  Squire's    Son  '    of    the      (sixteenth  century),  looks  more  like 
Durham   dances    is    probably  the      a  dance  or  play : 

clown's     son     of     the     Wharfdale  '  I  ame  a  knighte 

version;   for  the  term  'squire'  is  And  menes  to  fight 
not  an  uncommon  one  for  the  rustic  And  armet  well  ame  I 

fool.      Cf.   also  the   Revesby   play  Lo  here  I  stand 

described  in  the  next  chapter.  Why  With  swerd  ine  hand 
the  fool  should  have  a  son,  I  do  not  My  manhoud  for  to  try. 

2°^u    <xr-      \xr  _^u-     »    c  r       ,  Thou  marciall  wite 

2  The 'Nine  Worthies    of  Love's  That  menes  to  fight 
Labour  s  Lost,  v.  2  are  a  pageant  And  sete  n  me  so 
not  a  dance,  and  the  two  sets  of  Lo  heare  j  stand 
speeches  quoted  from  Bodl.  Tanner  wkh  swrdJ  in  hand 

MS    407,  by  Ritson,  Remarks  on  To  dubbene  eurey  blow.' 

Shakesfieare    &,  one   of  which   is  8  M  ^    finds   in  the 

called  by  Ashton   127,  the  earliest  dance  I  symboiicai  drama  of  the 

mummers    play  that  he  can  find,  death  of  Jinter     but  he  does  not 

also  probably  belong  to  pageants.  seem  t0  see  the  actual  relic  of  a 

The  following  also  quoted  by  R.tson  sacrificial  rite. 
toe.  at.  from  Hart.  MS.  1197,  f.  10 1* 


THE  SWORD-DANCE 


203 


its  turn,  drifted  into  the  popular  versions.  We  have  already- 
seen  that  popular  heroic  cantilenae  existed  together  with 
those  of  minstrelsy  up  to  a  late  date.  Nor  does  Miillenhoffs 
view  find  much  support  from  the  classical  sword-dances  which 
he  adduces.  As  to  the  origin  of  the  lusus  Troiae  or  Pyrrhic 
dance  which  the  Romans  adopted  from  Doric  Greece,  I  can 
say  nothing1;  but  the  native  Italian  dance  of  the  Salii  or 
priests  of  Mars  in  March  and  October  is  clearly  agricultural. 
It  belongs  to  the  cult  of  Mars,  not  as  war-god,  but  in  his  more 
primitive  quality  of  a  fertilization  spirit2. 

Further,  I  believe  that  the  use  of  swords  in  the  dance  was 
not  martial  at  all  ;  their  object  was  to  suggest  not  a  fight,  but 
a  mock  or  symbolical^gagfirlce.  SeveraTof  the  dances  include' 
figures  in  which  the  swords  are  brought  together  in  a  signifi- 
cant manner  about  the  person  of  one  or  more  of  the  dancers. 
Thus  in  the  Scandinavian  dance  described  by  Olaus  Magnus, 
a  quadrata  rosa  of  swords  is  placed  on  the  head  of  each 
performer.  A  precisely  similar  figure  occurs  in  the  Shetland 
and  in  a  variety  of  the  Yorkshire  dances  3.  In  the  Sieben- 
biirgen  dances  there  are  two  figures  in  which  the  performers 
pretend  to  cut  at  each  other's  heads  or  feet,  and  a  third  in 
which  one  of  them  has  the  swords  put  in  a  ring  round  his 
neck4.  This  latter  evolution  occurs  also  in  a  variety  of  the 
Yorkshire  dance  6  and  in  a  Spanish  one  described  by  Miillen- 


1  Mullenhoff,  114;  Du  Meril, 
La  Com.  82  ;  Plato,  Leges,  815  ; 
Dion  Cassius,  Ix.  23  ;  Suetonius, 
Julius,  39,  Nero,  12  ;  Servius  ad 
Aen.  v.  602  ;  cf.  p.  7.  A  Thracian 
sword-dance,  ending  in  a  mimic 
death,  and  therefore  closely  parallel 
to  the  west  European  examples 
mentioned  in  the  next  chapter,  is 
described  by  Xenophon,  Anabasis, 
v.  9. 

2  Mullenhoff,  115;  Frazer,iii.i22; 
W.  W.  Fowler,  The  Roman  Festi- 
vals, 38,  44.  The  song  of  the  Salii 
mentioned  Saeturnus,god  of  sowing. 
It  appears  also  to  have  been  their 
function  to  expel  the  Mamurius 
Veturius  in  spring.  Servius  ad  Aen. 
viii.  285,  says  that  the  Salii  were 
founded  by  Morrius,  king  of  Veii. 


According  to  Frazer,  Morrius  is 
etymologically  equivalent  to  Ma- 
murius— Mars.  He  even  suggests 
that  Morris  may  possibly  belong  to 
the  same  group  of  words. 

3  Cf.  Appendix  J.  In  other  dances 
a  performer  stands  on  a  similar 
'  knot '  or  Stern  of  swords.  Mayer, 
230,suggests  thatthis  may  represent 
the  triumph  of  summer,  which  seems 
a  little  far-fetched. 

*  Mayer,  243 ;  O.  Wittstock,  in 
Sievers-Festgabe,  349. 

6  Grimm,  i.  304,  gives  the  follow- 
ing as  communicated  to  him  by 
J.  M.  Kemble,  from  the  mouth  of 
an  old  Yorkshireman :  '  In  some 
parts  of  northern  England,  in  York- 
shire, especially  Hallamshire,  popu- 
lar customs  show  remnants  of  the 


204 


FOLK  DRAMA 


hoff  after  a  seventeenth-century  writer.     And  here  the  figure 
has  the  significant  name  of  la  degollada, '  the  beheading  V 


worship  of  Fri eg.  In  the  neighbour- 
hood of  Dent,  at  certain  seasons  of 
the  year,  especially  autumn,  the 
country  folk  hold  a  procession  and 
perform  old  dances,  one  called  the 
giants  dance  :  the  leading  giant 
they  name  Woden,  and  his  wife 
Frigga,  the  principal  action  of  the 
play  consisting  in  two  swords  being 
swung  and  clashed  together  about 
the  neck  of  a  boy  without  hurting 
him.'  There  is  nothing  about  this 
in  the  account  of  Teutonic  mytho- 
logy in  J.  M.  Kemble's  own  Saxons 
in  England.  I  do  not  believe  that 
the  names  of  Woden  and  Frigga 
were  preserved  in  connexion  with 
this  custom  continuously  from 
heathen  times.  Probably  some 
antiquary  had  introduced  them ; 
and  in  error,  for  there  is  no  reason 


to  suppose  that  the  '  clown '  and 
'  woman '  of  the  sword-dance  were 
ever  thought  to  represent  gods. 
But  the  description  of  the  business 
with  the  swords  is  interesting. 

1  Miillenhoff,  Z.f.  d.  A.  xviii.  II, 
quoting  Covarubias,  Tesoro  della 
tengua  castellana  (161 1),  s.v.  Danza 
de  Espadas  :  '  una  mudanza  que 
llaman  la  degollada,  porque  cercan 
el  cuello  del  que  los  guia  con  las 
espadas.'  With  these  sword  man- 
oeuvres should  be  compared  the 
use  of  scythes  and  flails  in  the 
mock  sacrifices  of  the  harvest-field 
and  threshing-floor  (p.  158),  the 
'  Chop  off  his  head'  of  the  '  Oranges 
and  Lemons'  game  (p.  1 51),  and 
the  ancient  tale  of  Wodan  and  the 
Mowers. 


CHAPTER   X 
THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY 

[Bibliographical  Note.— The  subject  is  treated  by  T.  F.  Ordish,  English 
Folk-Drama  in  Folk-Lore,  ii.  326,  iv.  162.  The  Folk-Lore  Society  has 
in  preparation  a  volume  on  Folk-Drama  to  be  edited  by  Mr.  Ordish 
(F.  L.  xiii.  296).  The  following  is  a  list  of  the  twenty-nine  printed 
versions  upon  which  the  account  of  the  St.  George  play  in  the  present 
chapter  is  based.     The  Lutterworth  play  is  given  in  Appendix  K. 

Northumberland. 

1.  Newcastle.  Chap-book— W.  Sandys,  Christmastide,  292,  from  Alex- 
ander and  the  King  of  Egypt.  A  mock  Play,  as  it  is  acted  by  the 
Mummers  every  Christmas.  Newcastle,  1788.  XDivided  into  Acts 
and  Scenes.) 

Cumberland. 

2.  Whitehaven.  Chap-book— Hone,  E.  D.  £.  ii.  1646.  (Practically 
identical  with  (1).) 

Lancashire. 

3.  Manchester.  Chap-book—  The  Peace  Egg,  published  by  J.  Wrigley, 
30,  Miller  Street,  Manchester.  (Brit.  Mus.  1077,  g/27  (37):  Acts  and 
Scenes :  a  coloured  cut  of  each  character.) 

Shropshire. 

4.  Newport.  Oral.  Jackson  and  Burne,  484.  (Called  the  Guisers' 
(gheez-u'rz)  play.) 

5.  Eccleshall.  Oral.  F.  L.  J.  iv.  350.  (Guisers'  play :  practically 
identical  with  (4).  I  have  not  seen  a  version  from  Stone  in  W.  W. 
Bladen,  Notes  on  the  Folk-lore  of  North  Staffs. :  cf.  F.  L.  xiii.  107.) 

Leicestershire. 

6.  Lutterworth.     Oral.     Kelly,  53  ;  Manly,  i.  292  ;  Leicester  F.  L.  130. 

Worcestershire. 

7.  Leigh.     Oral.     2  N.  Q.  xi.  271. 

Warwickshire. 

8.  Newbold.  Oral.  F.  L.  x.  186  (with  variants  from  a  similar  Rugby 
version). 

Oxfordshire. 

9.  /slip.     Oral.     Ditchfield,  316. 

10.  Bampton.     Oral.     Ditchfield,  320. 

11.  Thame.     Oral.     5  N.  Q.  ii.  503 ;  Manly,  i.  289. 

12.  Uncertain.     Oral.     6  N.  Q.  xii.  489  ;  Ashton,  128. 

Berkshire. 

13.  Uncertain.    Oral.     Ditchfield,  310. 

Middlesex. 

14.  Chiswick.     Oral.     2  N.  Q.  x.  466. 


206  FOLK  DRAMA 

Sussex. 

15.  Selmeslon.  Oral.  Parish,  Diet,  of  Sussex  Dialect  (2nd  ed.  1875), 
136. 

16.  Hollington.     Oral.     5  N.  Q.  x.  489. 

17.  Steyning.    Oral.    F.  L.J.  ii.  1.     (The  «  Tipteerers"  play.) 

Hampshire. 

18.  St.  Mary  Bourne.     Oral.     Stevens,  Hist,  of  St.  Mary  Bourne,  340. 

19.  Uncertain.     Oral.     2  TV.  2-  xh-  492. 
Dorsetshire. 

20.  (A)  Uncertain.    Oral.    i7.  Z.  i?.  iii.  92;  Ashton,  129. 

21.  (B)  Uncertain.     Oral.    .F.  Z..  /?.  iii.  102. 

Cornwall. 

22.  Uncertain.  Oral.  Sandys,  Chrisimastide,  298.  (Slightly  different 
version  in  Sandys,  Christmas  Carols,  174;  Du  Menl,  Z.a  Gw*.  428.J 

Wales. 

23.  7V«<5y.  Oral.  Chambers,  Book  of  Days,  ii.  740,  from  Tales  and 
Traditions  of  Tenby. 

Ireland. 

24.  Belfast.    Chap-book.    4  N.  Q.  x.  487.   ('  The  Christmas  Rhymes.') 

25.  Ballybrennan,  Wexford.  Oral.  Kennedy,  The  Banks  of  the  Boro, 
226. 

Uncertain  Locality. 

26.  Sharpens  London  Magazine,  i.  154.     Oral. 

27.  Archaeologist,  i.  176.  Chap-book.  H.  Sleight,  .,4  Christmas  Pageant 
Play  or  Mysterie  of  St.  George,  Alexander  and  the  King  of  Egypt. 
(Said  to  be  '  compiled  from  and  collated  with  several  curious  ancient 
black-letter  editions.'  I  have  never  seen  or  heard  of  a  '  black-letter ' 
edition,  and  I  take  it  the  improbable  title  is  Mr.  Sleight's  own.) 

28.  Halliwell.  Oral.  Popular  Rhymes,  231.  (Said  to  be  the  best 
of  six  versions.) 

29.  F.  L.J.  iv.  97.     (Fragment,  from  '  old  MS.')] 

The  degollada  figures  of  certain  sword-dances  preserve  with 
some  clearness  the  memory  of  an  actual  sacrifice,  abolished 
and  replaced  by  a  mere  symbolic  dumb  show.     Even  in  these, 


and  still  more  in  the  other  dances,  the  symbolism  is  very  slight. 
It  is  completely  subordinated  to  the  rhythmic  evolutions  of 
a  choric  figure.  There  is  an  advance,  however,  in  the  direction 
of  drama,  when  in  the  course  of  the  performance  some  one  is 
represented  as  actually  slain.  In  a  few  dances  of  the  type 
discussed  in  the  last  chapter,  such  a  dramatic  episode  precedes 
or  follows  the  regular  figures.  It  is  recorded  in  three  or  four 
of  the  German  examples1.  A  writer  in  the  Gentleman's 
Magazine  describes  a  Yorkshire  dance  in  which  •  the  Bessy 
interferes  while  they  are  making  a  hexagon  with  their  swords, 
and   is   killed.'     Amongst  the   characters   of  this   dance  is 

1  Mayer,  229. 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  207 

a  Doctor,  and  although  the  writer  does  not  say  so,  it  may  be 
inferred  that  the  function  of  the  Doctor  is  to  bring  the  Bessy 
to  life  again  *.  It  will  be  remembered  that  a  precisely  similar 
device  is  used  in  the  German  Shrove  Tuesday  plays  to 
symbolize  the  resurrection  of  the  year  in  spring  after  its  death 
in  winter.  The  Doctor^lreappears  m  one~oT  the  Durham 
dances,  and  here  there  is  no  doubt  as  to  the  part  he  plays. 
At  a  certain  point  the  careful  formations  of  the  dance  degenerate 
into  a  fight.  The  parish  clergyman  rushes  in  to  separate  the 
combatants.  He  is  accidentally  slain.  There  is  general 
lamentation,  but  the  Doctor  comes  forward,  and  revives  the 
victim,  and  the  dance  proceeds  2. 

It  is  but  a  step  from  such  dramatic  episodes  to  the  more 
elaborate  performances  which  remain  to  be  considered  in  the 
present  chapter,  and  which  are  properly  to  be  called  J>lays 

i^Lther_thati^ dances^ They  belong  to  a  stage  in  the  evolution 

of  drama  from  dance,  in  which  the  dance  has  been  driven  into 
the^bacTcground  and  has  sometimes  disappeared  altogether. 
But  they  have  the  same  characters,  and  especially  the  same 
grotesques,  as  the  dances,  and  the  general  continuity  of  the 
two  sets  of  performances  cannot  be  doubted.  Moreover, 
though  the  plays  differ  in  many  respects,  they  have  a  common 
incident,  which  may  reasonably  be  taken  to  be  the  central 
incident,  in  the  death  and  revival,  generally  by  a  Doctor,  of 
one  of  the  characters.  And  in  virtue  of  this  central  incident 
one  is  justified  in  classing  them  as  forms  of  a  folk-drama  in 
which  the  resurrection  of  the  year  is  symbolized. 

I  take  first,  on  account  of  the  large  amount  of  dancing  which 
remains  in  it,  the  play  acted  at  the  end  of  the  eighteenth 
century  by  '  The  Plow  Boys  or  Morris  Dancers  '  of  Revesby 
in  Lincolnshire  3.    There  are  seven  dancers  :  six  men,  the  Fool 

1  Gentleman's  Magazine,  lxxxi  clergyman  took  part,  or  whether 
(181 1 ),  1.423.  The  dance  was  given  a  mere  personage  in  the  play  is 
in  the  north  Riding  from  St.  intended  ;  but  see  what  Olaus 
Stephen's  day  to  the  New  Year.  Magnus  (App.  J  (i))  says  about  the 
Besides  the  Bessy  and  the  Doctor  propriety  of  the  sword-dances  for 
there  were  six  lads,  one  of  whom  clerici.  It  will  be  curious  if  the 
acted  king  '  in  a  kind  of  farce  Christian  priest  has  succeeded  to 
which  consists  of  singing  and  the  part  of  the  heathen  priest  slain, 
dancing.'  first  literally,  and  then  in  mimicry, 

2  Bell,  178  ;  cf.  p.  193.     I  do  not  at  the  festivals. 

feel  sure  whether  the  actual  parish         3  Printed  by  Mr.  T.  F.  Ordish  in 


208  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  his  five  sons,  Pickle  Herring,  Blue  Breeches,  Pepper 
Breeches,  Ginger  Breeches,  and  Mr.  Allspice 1 ;  and  one 
woman,  Cicely.  The  somewhat  incoherent  incidents  are  as 
follows.  The  Fool  acts  as  presenter  and  introduces  the  play. 
He  fights  successively  a  Hobby-horse  and  a  '  Wild  Worm '  or 
dragon.  The  dancers  '  lock  their  swords  to  make  the  glass,' 
which,  after  some  jesting,  is  broken  up  again.  The  sons 
determine  to  kill  the  Fool.  He  kneels  down  and  makes  his 
will,  with  the  swords  round  his  neck2 ;  is  slain  and  revived  by 
Pickle  Herring  stamping  with  his  foot.  This  is  repeated 
with  variations.  Hitherto,  the  dancers  have  '  footed  it '  round 
the  room  at  intervals.  Now  follow  a  series  of  sword-dances. 
During  and  after  these  the  Fool  and  his  sons  in  turn  woo  Cicely, 
the  Fool  taking  the  name  of  '  Anthony  V  Pickle  Herring  that 
of '  the  Lord  of  Pool,'  and  Blue  Breeches  that  of  •  the  Knight 
of  Lee.'  There  is  nothing  particularly  interesting  about  this 
part  of  the  play,  obviously  written  to  '  work  in '  the  woman 
grotesque.  In  the  course  of  it  a  morris-dance  is  introduced, 
and  a  final  sword-dance,  with  an  obeisance  to  the  master  of  the 
house,  winds  up  the  whole. 

Secondly,  there  are  the  Plough  Monday  plays  of  the  east 
Midlands  4.    These  appear  in  Nottinghamshire,  Northampton- 

.F.Z.y.vii.338,  and  again  by  Manly,  earlier  Anglo-German  actor,  John 

i.  296.   The  MS.  used  appears  to  be  Spencer.     The   'spicy'  names  of 

headed   'October    Ye   20,   1779';  the    other    Revesby    clowns    are 

but  the  performers  are  called  '  The  probably  imitations  of  Pickle  Her- 

Plow  Boys  or  Morris  Dancers '  and  ring. 

the  prologue  says  that  they  'takes  2  The  lines  (197-8) 

delight  in  Christmas  toys.'     I  do  *  Our  old  Fool's  bracelet  is  not 

not  doubt  that  the  play  belonged  made  of  gold 

to    Plough    Monday,    which    only  But   it   is  made  of  iron  and 

falls    just    outside    the   Christmas  good  steel ' 

season.  suggest  the  vaunt  of  the  champions 

1  On  the  name  Pickle  Herring,  in  the  St.  George  plays, 

see  W.  Creizenach,  Die  Schauspiele  3  Is  '  Anthony '  a  reminiscence  of 

der  englischen  Komodianten,  xciii.  the  Seven  Champions?     The  Fool 

It  does  not  occur  in  old  English  says  (11.  247-9),  like  Beelzebub  in 

comedy,  but  was   introduced  into  the  St.  George  plays, 

Anglo-German  and  German  farce  '  Here  comes  I  that  never  come 

as  a  name  for  the  '  fool '  or  '  clown '  yet,  .  .  . 

by   Robert   Reynolds,  the   '  comic  I  have  a  great  head  but  little 

lead'    of   a   company  of    English  wit.' 

actors  who  crossed  to  Germany  in  He  also  jests  (1.  229)  on  his  '  tool ' ; 

1618.     Probably  it  was  Reynolds'  cf.  p.  196  n. 

invention,   and    suggested   by  the  *  Brand,  i.  278  ;  Dyer,  37 ;  Ditch- 

sobriquet  'Stockfish'  taken  by  an  field,  47;  Drake,65;  Mrs.  Chaworth 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY 


209 


shire  and  Lincolnshire.  Two  printed  versions  are  available. 
The  first  comes  from  Cropwell  in  Nottinghamshire1.  The 
actors  are  'the  plough-bullocks.'  The  male  characters  are 
Tom  the  Fool,  a  Recruiting  Sergeant,  and  a  Ribboner  or 
Recruit,  three  farm-servants,  Threshing  Blade,  Hopper  Joe2, 
and  the  Ploughman,  a  Doctor,  and  Beelzebub  3.  There  are 
two  women,  a  young  Lady  and  old  Dame  Jane.  Tom  Fool  is 
presenter.  The  Ribboner,  rejected  by  the  young  Lady,  enlists 
as  a  recruit.  The  Lady  is  consoled  by  Tom  Fool.  Then  enter 
successively  the  three  farm-servants,  each  describing  his 
function  on  the  farm.     Dame  Jane  tries  to  father  a  child  on 


Musters,  A  Cavalier  Stronghold, 
387.  Plough  Monday  is  the  Monday 
after  Twelfth  night,  when  the  field 
work  begins.  A  plough  is  dragged 
round  the  village  and  a  quite  made. 
The  survivals  ef  the  custom  are 
mainly  in  the  north,  east  and  east 
midlands.  In  the  city,  a  banquet 
marks  the  day.  A  Norfolk  name 
is  'Plowlick  Monday,'  and  a  Hunts 
one '  Plough-Witching.'  The  plough 
is  called  the  '  Fool  Plough,'  '  Fond 
Plough,'  'Stot  Plough'  or  'White 
Plough  ' ;  the  latter  name  probably 
from  the  white  shirts  worn  (cf. 
p.  200).  At' Cropwell,  Notts,  horses 
cut  out  in  black  or  red  adorn  these. 
In  Lincolnshire,  bunches  of  corn 
were  worn  in  the  hats.  Those  who 
draw  the  plough  are  called  'Plough 
Bullocks,'  '  Boggons  '  or  '  Stots.' 
They  sometimes  dance  a  morris-  or 
sword-dance,  or  act  a  play.  At 
Haxey,  they  take  a  leading  part 
in  the  Twelfth  day  '  Hood-game ' 
(p.  150).  In  Northants  their  faces 
are  blackened  or  reddled.  The 
plough  is  generally  accompanied 
by  the  now  familiar  grotesques, 
'  Bessy '  and  the  Fool  or  '  Captain 
Cauf-Tail.'  In  Northants  there 
are  two  of  each  ;  the  Fools  have 
humps,  and  are  known  as  '  Red 
Jacks';  there  is  also  a  'Master.' 
In  Lincolnshire,  reapers,  threshers, 
and  carters  joined  the  procession. 
A  contribution  to  thequete  is  greeted 
with  the  cry  of '  Largess  ! '  and  a 
churl  is  liable  to  have  the  ground 
before  his  door  ploughed  up.     Of 


old  the  profits  of  the  quete  or  'plow- 
gadrin  '  went  into  the  parish  chest, 
or  as  in  Norfolk  kept  a  'plow-light' 
burning  in  the  church.  A  sixteenth 
century  pamphlet  speaks  of  the 
'  sensing  the  Ploughess  '  on  Plough 
Monday.  Jevons,  247,  calls  the  rite 
a  'worship  of  the  plough1;  probably 
it  rather  represents  an  early  spring 
perambulation  of  the  fields  in  which 
the  divinity  rode  upon  a  plough, 
as  elsewhere  upon  a  ship.  A  plough- 
ing custom  of  putting  a  loaf  in  the 
furrow  has  been  noted.  Plough 
Monday  has  also  its  water  rite. 
The  returning  ploughman  was  liable 
to  be  soused  by  the  women,  like  the 
bearer  of  the  '  neck '  at  harvest. 
Elsewhere,  the  women  must  get 
the  kettle  on  before  the  ploughman 
can  reach  the  hearth,  or  pay  for- 
feit. 

1  Printed  by  Mrs.  Chaworth 
Musters  in  A  Cavalier  Stronghold 
(1890),  388,  and  in  a  French  transla- 
tion by  Mrs.  H.  G.  M.  Murray- 
Aynsley,  in  R.  d.  T.  P.  iv.  605. 

2  'Hopper  Joe'  also  calls  himself 
*  old  Sanky-Benny,'  which  invites 
interpretation.  Is  it  'Saint  Bennet' 
or  '  Benedict '  ? 

3  '  In  comes  I,  Beelzebub, 

On  my  shoulder  I   carry  my 

club, 
In   my   hand    a  wet    leather 

frying-pan  ; 
Don't  you  think  I'm  a  funny 

old  man  ? ' 
Cf.  the  St.  George  play  (p.  214). 


CHAMBERS.     I 


210  FOLK  DRAMA 

Tom  Pool.  Beelzebub  knocks  her  down  \  and  kills  her.  The 
Doctor  comes  in,  and  after  some  comic  business  about  his 
travels,  his  qualifications  and  his  remedies2,  declares  Dame 
Jane  to  be  only  in  a  trance,  and  raises  her  up.  A  country- 
dance  and  songs  follow,  and  the  performance  ends  with 
a  quite.  The  second  version,  from  Lincolnshire,  is  very- 
similar  3.  But  there  are  no  farm-servants,  and  instead  of 
Beelzebub  is  a  personage  called  '  old  Esem  Esquesem,'  who 
carries  a  broom.  It  is  he,  not  an  old  woman,  who  is  killed 
and  brought  to  life.  There  are  several  dancers,  besides  the 
performers ;  and  these  include  '  Bessy,'  a  man  dressed  as 
a  woman,  with  a  cow's  tail. 

The  distinction  between  a  popular  and  a  literary  or  heroic 
type  of  personification  which  was  noticeable  in  the  sword- 
dances  persists  in  the  folk-plays  founded  uj3on_  them. 
Both  in  the  Revesby  play  and  in  the  Plough  Monday  plays7 
the  drama  is  carried  on  by  personages  resembling  the 
1  grotesques  '  of  the  sword-  and  morris-dances  4.  There  are  no 
heroic  characters.  The  death  is  of  the  nature  of  an  accident 
or  an  execution.  On  the  other  hand,  in  the  '  mummers'  play ' 
of  St.  George,  the  heroes  take  once  more  the  leading  part,  and 
the  death,  or  at  least  one  of  the  deaths,  is  caused  by  a  fight 
amongst  them.  This  play  is  far  more  widely  spread  than  its 
rivals.  It  is  found  in  all  parts  of  England,  in  Wales,  and  in 
Ireland  ;  in  Scotland  it  occurs  also,  but  here  some  other  hero 
is  generally  substituted  as  protagonist  for  St.  George  5.     The 

1  '  Dame  Jane  '  says,  n.  i)  but  not  described,  probably 
'  My  head  is  made  of  iron,  belonged  to  the  '  popular '  type. 

My  body  made  of  steel,  5  Chambers,  Popular  Rhymes  of 
My  hands  and  feet  of  knuckle-  Scotland,  169,  prints  a  Peebles  ver- 
bone,  sion.     Instead   of  George,  a  hero 
I  think  nobody  can  make  me  called    Galatian    fights  the   Black 
feel.'  Knight.     Judas,  with  his  bag,  re- 
in the  Lincolnshire  play  Beelzebub  places   Beelzebub.      But  it   is    the 
has  this  vaunt.     Cf.  the  St.  George  same  play.     Versions  or  fragments 
play  (p.  220).  of  it  are  found  all  over  the  Low- 

2  The  Doctor  can  cure 'the  hipsy-  lands.  The  performers  are  invari- 
pipsy,  palsy,  and  the  gout ' ;  cf.  the  ably  called  '  guizards.'  In  a  Falkirk 
St.  George  play  (p.  213).  version  the  hero  is  Prince  George 

3  Printed  in  French  by  Mrs.  ofVille.  Hone,  E.  D.  B.,  says  that 
Murray  Aynsley  in  R.  d.  T.  P.  iv.  the  hero  is  sometimes  Galacheus  or 
609.  St.  Lawrence.     But  in  another  Fal- 

*  The  farce  recorded  as  occasion-  kirk  version,  part  of  which  he  prints, 
ally  introduced  at  Whitby  (cf.  p.  192,     the  name  is  Galgacus,  and  of  this 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  211 

following  account  is  based  on  the  twenty-nine  versions,  drawn 
from  chap-books  or  from  oral  tradition,  enumerated  in  the 
bibliographical  note.  The  list  might,  doubtless,  be  almost 
indefinitely  extended.  As  will  soon  be  seen,  the_lo^aJ_yaria=L- 
tions  of  the  play— are  numerous.  In  order  to  make  them 
intelligible,  I  have  given  in  full  in  an  appendix  a  version  from 
Lutterworth  in  Leicestershire.  This  is  chosen,  not  as  a  par- 
ticularly interesting  variant,  for  that  it  is  not,  but  on  the 
contrary  as  being  comparatively  colourless.  It  shows  very 
clearly  and  briefly  the  normal  structure  of  the  play,  and  may  be 
regarded  as  the  type  from  which  the  other  versions  diverge  1. 
The  whole  perJoxmajice  may  be  divided,  for  convenience  of 
analysis,  into  three  parts,  the  Presentation,  the  Drama,  the 
Q^iie^.ln  the  first  somebody  speaks  a  prologue,  claiming  a 
welcome  from  the  s£ectators2,  and  then  the  leading  characters 
are  in  turn  introduced.  The  second  consists  of  a  fight 
followed  by  the  intervention  of  a  doctor  to  revive  the  slain. 
In  the  third  some  supernumerary  characters  enter,  and  there 
is  a  collection.  It  is  the_dramatic  nucleus  that  first  requires 
consideration.  The  leading  fighter  is  generally  St.  George, 
jyho  alone  appears  in  all  the  versions.  Instead  of '  St.  George,' 
he  is  sometimes  called  c  Sir  George,'  and  more  often  '  Prince 
George '  or  '  King  George,'  modifications  which  one  may 
reasonably  suppose  to  be  no  older  than  the  present  Hanoverian 
dynasty.  At  Whitehaven  and  at  Falkirk  he  is  *  Prince  George 
of  Ville.'     George's  chief  opponent  is  usually  one  of  two  per- 

both  Galacheus  and  Galatian  are  2  In  F.  L.  x.  351,  Miss  Florence 

probably  corruptions,  for  Galgacus  Grove    describes   some    Christmas 

or  Calgacus  was  the  leader  of  the  mummers  seen  at  Mullion, Cornwall, 

Picts  in  their  battle  with  Agricola  in    1 890-1.      'Every  one  naturally 

at   the   Mons    Graupius  (a.  d.  84 ;  knows   who   the  actors  are,   since 

Tacitus,  Agricola,  29).  there    are   not   more    than   a   few 

1  Appendix  K.      Other  versions  hundred    persons     within     several 

may  be  conveniently  compared  in  miles  ;  but  no  one  is  supposed  to 

Manly,  i.  289;  Ditchfield,  310.    The  know  who  they  are  or  where  they 

best  discussions  of  the  St.  George  come  from,  nor  must  any  one  speak 

*        plays  in  general,  besides  Mr.  Or-  to   them,  nor  they  to  those  in  the 

dish's,  are  J.  S.  Udall,  Christmas  houses  they  visit.     As  far  as  I  can 

Mummers  in  Dorsetshire  (F.  L.  R.  remember  the  performance  is  silent 

iii.  1.  87) ;  Jackson  and  Burne,  482  ;  and  dramatic  ;  I  have  no  recollec- 

G.  L.  Gomme,  Christmas  Mummers  tion  of  reciting.'     The  dumb  show 

{Nature,  Dec.  23,  1897).    The  notes  is  rare  and  probably  a  sign  of  deca- 

and  introductions  to  the  versions  ta-  dence,  butjbe  bit  of  rural  etiquelte  is 

bulated  above  give  many  useful  data.  archaicTancTrecursln  savagediama. 

P  2 


1 


L 


212  FOLK  DRAMA 

sonages,  who  are  not  absolutely  distinct  from  each  other1. 
One  is  the  '  Turkish  Knight,'  of  whom  a  variant  appears  to  be 
the '  Prince  Of  Paradine '  (Manchester),  or  '  Paradise '  (Newport, 
Eccleshall),  perhaps  originally  '  Palestine.'  I|ejLs_SQmgtimes 
represented  with  a  blackened  face2.  The  other  is  variously 
called  '  Slasher,'  '  Captain  Slasher,'  '  Bold  Slasher,'  or,  by  an 
obvious  corruption,  '  Beau  Slasher.'  Rarer  names  for  him  are 
'  Bold  Slaughterer'  (Bampton),  'Captain  Bluster'  (Dorset  [A]), 
and  '  Swiff,  Swash,  and  Swagger'  (Chiswick).  His  names  fairly- 
express  his  vaunting,  disposition,  which,  however,  is  largely 
shared  by  the  other  characters  in  the  play.  In  the  place  of, 
or  as  minor  fighters  by  the  side  of  George,  the  Turkish  Knight 
and  Bold  Slasher,  there  appear,  in  one  version  or  another, 
a  bewildering  variety  of  personages,  of  whom  only  a  rough 
classification  can  be  attempted.  Some  belong  to  the  heroic 
cycles.'  Such  are  '  Alexander '  (Newcastle,  Whitehaven), 
'  Hector '  (Manchester),  '  St.  Guy '  (Newport),  '  St.  Giles  ' 
(Eccleshall) 3,  « St.  Patrick  '  (Dorset  [A],  Wexford),  '  King 
Alfred '  and  '  King  Cole  '  (Brill),  '  Giant  Blunderbore  '  (Brill), 
'  Giant  Turpin  '  (Cornwall).  Others  again  are  moderns  who 
have  caught  the  popular  imagination  :  '  Bold  Bonaparte ' 
_[Leigh)^,  and  '  King  of  Prussia '  (Bampton,  Oxford)  5,  '  King 
William  '  (Brill),  the  '  Duke  of  Cumberland  '  (Oxford)  and  the 
'  Duke  of  Northumberland  '  (Islip),  '  Lord  Nelson  '  (Stoke 
Gabriel,  Devon)  6,  '  Wolfe '  and  '  Wellington  '  (Cornwall) 7, 
even  the  '  Prince  Imperial '  (Wilts) 8,  all  have  been  pressed 
into  the  service.  In  some  cases  characters  have  lost  their 
personal  names,  if  they  ever  had  any,  and  figure  merely  as 
'  Knight,'  '  Soldier,'  '  Valiant  Soldier,'  «  Noble  Captain,'  '  Bold 
Prince,'  '  Gracious  King.'  Others  bear  names  which  defy 
explanation, '  Alonso  '  (Chiswick),  '  Hy  Gwyer  '  (Hollington), 

1  In  Berkshire  and  at  Eccleshall,  from  English  ground,'  St.  Guy  (of 
Slasher  is  '  come  from  Turkish  Warwick)  was  probably  the  origi- 
land.'  On  the  other  hand,  the  two  nal  form,  and  St.  Giles  a  corruption, 
often  appear  in  the  same  version,  4  Here  may  be  traced  the  influence 
and  even,  as  at  Leigh,  fight  together,  of  the  Napoleonic  wars.     In  Berk- 

2  Burne-Jackson,  483.  shire,  Slasher  is  a  '  French  officer.' 

3  Ibid.  483.      He  appears  in  the  B  F.  L.  v.  88. 
MSS.    written    by    the    actors   as  8  Ditchfield,  12. 
'  Singuy '  or  '  Singhiles.'     Professor  7  Sandys,  153. 

Skeat  points  out  that,  as  he  '  sprang         8  P.  Tennant,  Village  Notes,  179. 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  213 

'  Marshalee  '  and  '  Cutting  Star  '  (Dorset  [B]).  The  signifi- 
cance of  «  General  Valentine  '  and  '  Colonel  Spring '  (Dorset 
[A])  will  be  considered  presently ;  and  '  Room '  (Dorset  [B]), 
'Little  Jack,'  the  *  Bride'  and  the  '  Fool '  (Brill),  and  the  «  King 
of  Egypt '  (Newcastle,  Whitehaven)  have  strayed  in  amongst 
the  fighters  from  the  presenters.  The  fighting  generally  takes 
the  form  of  a  duel,  or  a  succession  of  duels.  In  the  latter  case, 
George  may  fight  all  comers,  or  he  may  intervene  to  subdue 
a  previously  successful  champion.  But  an  important  point  is_ 
that  he  is  not  always  victorious.  On  the  contrary,  the  versions 
in  which  he  slays  and  those  in  which  he  is  slain  are  about 
equal  in  number.  In  two  versions  (Brill,  Steyning)  the  fight- 
ing is  not  a  duel  or  a  series  of  duels,  but  a  mette.  The  Brill 
play,  in  particular,  is  quite  unlike  the  usual  type.  A  prominent 
part  is  taken  by  the  Dragon,  with  whom  fight,  all  at  once, 
St.  George  and  a  heterogeneous  company  made  up  of  King 
Alfred  and  his  Bride,  King  Cole,  King  William,  Giant  Blun- 
derbore,  Little  Jack  and  a  morris-dance  Fool.  \ 

Whatever  the  nature  of  the  fight,  the  result  is  always  the 
same.  One  or  more  of  the  champions  falls,  and  then  appears 
upon  the  scene  a  Doctor,  who  brings  the  dead  to  life  again. 
The  Doctor  is  a  comic  character.  He  enters,  boasting  his 
universal  skill,  and  works  his  cure  by  exhibiting  a  bolus,  or  by 
drawing  out  a  tooth  with  a  mighty  pair  of  pliers.  At  New- 
bold  he  is  '  Dr.  Brown/  at  Islip  '  Dr.  Good '  (also  called  '  Jack 
Spinney '.),  at  Brill  '  Dr.  Ball '  ;  in  Dorsetshire  (A)  he  is  an 
Irishman,  'Mr.  Martin'  (perhaps  originally  'Martyr')  'Dennis.' 
More  often  he  is  nameless.  Frequently  the  revival  scene  is 
duplicated  ;  either  the  Doctor  is  called  in  twice,  or  one  cure 
is  left  to  him,  and  another  is  effected  by  some  other  per- 
former, such  as  St.  George  (Dorset  [B]),  '  Father  Christmas ' 
(Newbold,  Steyning),  or  the  Fool  (Bampton). 

The  central  action  of  the  play  consists,  then,  in  these  two 
episodes  of  the  fight^and  the  resurrection  ;  and  the  ,protago= 
nists,  so  to  speak,  are  the  heroes— a  ragged  troop  of  heroes, 
certainly — and  the  Doctor.  But  just  as  in  the  sword-dances, 
so  in  the  plays,  we  find  introduced,  besides  the  protagonists, 
a  number  of  supernumerary  figures.  The  nature  of  these,  and 
the  part  they  take,  must  now  be  considered.     Some  of  them 


214  FOLK  DRAMA 

are  by  this  time  familiar.  They  are  none  other  than  the 
grotesques  that  have  haunted  this  discussion  of  the  village 
festivals  from  the  very  beginning,  and  that  I  have  attempted 
to  trace  to  their  origin  in  magical  or  sacrificial  custom. 
There  are  the  woman,  or  lad  dressed  in  woman's  clothes,  the 
hobby-horse,  the  fool,  and  the  black-faced  man.  The  woman 
and  the  hobby-horse  are  unmistakable  ;  the  other  two  are 
a  little  more  Protean  in  their  modern  appearance.  The  '  Fool ' 
is  so  called  only  at  Manchester  and  at  Brill,  where  he  brings 
his  morris-dance  with  him.  At  Lutterworth  he  is  the 
'  Clown' ;  in  Cornwall, '  Old  Squire ' ;  at  Newbold,  '  Big  Head 
and  Little  Wits.'  But  I  think  that  we  may  also  recognize 
him  in  the  very  commonly  occurring  figure  '  Beelzebub,'  also 
known  in  Cornwall  as  '  Hub  Bub '  and  at  Chiswick  as  '  Lord 
Grubb.'  The  key  to  this  identification  is  the  fact  that  in 
several  cases  Beelzebub  uses  the  description  '  big  head  and 
little  wit '  to  announce  himself  on  his  arrival.  Occasionally, 
however,  the  personality  of  the  Fool  has  been  duplicated. 
At  Lutterworth  Beelzebub  and  the  Clown,  at  Newbold  Beel- 
zebub and  Big  Head  and  Little  Wits  appear  in  the  same  play  *. 
The  black-faced  man  has  in  some  cases  lost  his  black  face, 
but  he  keeps  it  at  Bampton,  where  he  is  '  Tom  the  Tinker,' 
at  Rugby,  where  he  is  '  Little  Johnny  Sweep,'  and  in  a  Sussex 
version,  where  he  is  also  a  sweep 2.  The  analogy  of  the  May- 
day chimney-sweeps  is  an  obvious  one.  "A  black  face  was^ 
a  feature  in  the  mediaeval  representatiojauoX- devils,  and  the 
sweep  of  some  plays  is  probably  in  origin  identical  with  the 
devil,  black-faced_or  not,  of  others.     This  is  all  the  more  so, 

1  Beelzebub  appears  also  in  the  horses  being  represented  at  different 
Cropwell  Plough  Monday  play;  places  where  details  of  the  mumming 
cf.  p.  209.  Doubtless  he  once  wore  play  have  been  recorded.'  Nowa- 
a  calf-skin,  like  other  rural  '  Fools,'  days,  Beelzebub  generally  carries  a 
but,  as  far  as  I  know,  this  feature  has  club  and  a  ladle  or  frying-pan,  with 
dropped  out.  Sandys,  154,  however,  which  he  makes  the  quite.  At 
quotes  '  Captain  Calf-tail '  as  the  Newport  and  Eccleshall  he  has  a 
name  of  the '  Fool '  in  an  eighteenth-  bell  fastened  on  his  back  ;  at  New- 
century  Scotch  version,  and  Mr.  bold  he  has  a  black  face.  The 
Gomme  (Nature,  Dec.  23,  1897),  '  Fool '  figured  in  the  Manchester 
says  'some  of  the  mummers,  or  chap-book  resembles  Punch, 
maskers  as  the  name  implies,  for-  2  See  notes  to  Steyning  play  in 
merly  disguised  themselves  as  ani-  F.  L.J.  ii.  I. 
mals— goats,  oxen,  deer,  foxes  and 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  215 

as  the  devil,  like  the  sweep,  usually  carries  a  besom  l.  One 
would  expect  his  name,  and  not  the  Fool's,  to  be  Beelzebub. 
He  is,  however, '  Little  Devil  Dout '  or  '  Doubt,'  '  Little  Jack 
Doubt '  or  '  Jack  Devil  Doubt.'  At  Leigh  Little  Devil  Doubt 
also  calls  himself  '  Jack,' 

'  With  my  wife  and  family  on  my  back ' ; 

and  perhaps  we  may  therefore  trace  a  further  avatar'  of  this 
same  personage  in  the  'John'  or  'Johnny  Jack'  who  at 
Salisbury  gives  a  name  to  the  whole  performance2.  He  is 
also  '  Little  Jack '  (Brill,  St.  Mary  Bourne),  '  Fat  Jack  '  (Islip), 
'  Happy  Jack '  (Berkshire,  Hollington),  '  Humpty  Jack  '  (New- 
bold).  He  generally  makes  the  remark  about  his  wife  and 
family.  What  he  does  carry  upon  his  back  is  sometimes 
a  hump,  sometimes  a  number  of  rag-dolls.  I  take  it  that  the 
hump  came  first,  and  that  the  dolls  arose  out  of  Jack's  jocular 
explanation  of  his  own  deformity.  But  why  the  hump  ? 
Was  it  originally  a  bag  of  soot  ?  Or  the  saccus  with  which 
the  German  Knechte  Ruperte  wander  in  the  Twelve  nights  ?  3 
At  Hollington  and  in  a  Hampshire  version  Jack  has  been 
somewhat  incongruously  turned  into  a  press-gang.  In  thJs 
capacity  he  gets  at  Hollington  the  additional  name  of 
1  Tommy  Twing-twang.' 

Having  got  these  grotesques,  traditional  accompaniments 
of  the  play,  to  dispose  of  somehow,  what  do  the  playwrights 
do  with  them  ?  The  simplest  and  most  primitive  method  is 
just  to  bring  them  in,  to  show  them  to  the  spectators  when 
the  righting  is  over.  Thus  Beelzebub,  like  the  Fool  at  one 
point  in  the  Revesby  play,  often  comes  in  with 

1  Here  come  I  ;   ain't  been  yit, 
Big  head  and  little  wit.' 

'  Ain't  been  yit ! '  Could  a  more  naYve  explanation  of  the 
presence  of  a  '  stock '  character  on  the  stage  be  imagined  ? 

1    Mr.   Gomme,    in     Nature  for  also  to  make  a  circle  for  the  players, 

Dec.  23,  1897,  finds  in  this  broom  but  here  it  may  have  merely  taken 

1  the  magic  weapon  of  the  witch  '  the  place  of  a  sword, 

discussed  by  Pearson,  ii.  29.     Prob-  2  Parish,  Diet,  of  Sussex  Dialect, 

ably,  however,  it    was    introduced  136.      The    mummers    are    called 

into  the   plays  for  the  purposes  of  'John  Jacks.' 

the  quite;  cf.  p.  217.      It  is  used  a  Cf.  p.  268,  n.  4. 


216  FOLK  DRAMA 

Similarly  in  Cornwall  the  woman  is  worked  in  by  making 
'Sabra,'  a  persona  muta,  come  forward  to  join  St.  George1.  In 
the  play  printed  in  Sharpens  London  Magazine  the  '  Hobby- 
horse '  is  led  in.  Obviously  personages  other  than  the  tradi- 
tional four  can  be  introduced  in  the  same  way,  at  the  bidding 
of  the  rustic  fancy.  Thus  at  Bampton '  Robin  Hood '  and  '  Little 
John '  briefly  appear,  in  both  the  Irish  plays  and  at  Tenby 
'  Oliver  Cromwell,'  at  Belfast  '  St.  Patrick,'  at  Steyning  the 
1  Prince  of  Peace.' 

Secondly,  the  supernumeraries  may  be  utilized,  either  as 
presenters  of  the  main  characters  or  for  the  purposes  of  the 
gue/elat  the  end.  Thus  at  Leigh  the  performance  is  begun 
by  Little  Devil  Doubt,  who  enters  with  his  broom  and  sweeps 
a  'room  '  or  'hall'  for  the  actors,  just  as  in  the  sword-dances 
a  preliminary  circle  is  made  with  a  sword  upon  the  ground 2. 
In  the  Midlands  this  is  the  task  of  the  woman,  called  at  Islip 
and  in  Berkshire  '  Molly,'  and  at  Bright-Walton  '  Queen 
Mary  V  Elsewhere  the  business  with  the  broom  is  omitted  ; 
but  there  is  nearly  always  a  short  prologue  in  which  an  appeal 
is  made  to  the  spectators  for  '  room.'  This  prologue  may  be 
spoken,  as  at  Manchester  by  the  Fool,  or  as  at  Lutterworth 
by  one  of  the  fighters.  The  commonest  presenter,  however, 
is  a  personification  of  the  festal  season  at  which  the  plays  are 
usually  performed,  '  Old  Father  Christmas.' 

'  Here  comes  I,  Father  Christmas,  welcome  or  welcome  not, 
I  hope  Old  Father  Christmas  will  never  be  forgot.' 

At  St.  Mary  Bourne  Christmas  is  accompanied  by  '  Mince- 
Pie,'  and  in  both  the  Dorset  versions,  instead  of  calling  for 
'  room,'  he  introduces  '  Room  '  as  an  actual  personage.  Simi- 
larly, at  Newport  and  Eccleshall,  the  prologue  speaker  receives 
the  curious  soubriquet  of  '  Open-the-Door.'     After  the  pro- 

1  Sandys,  301.  3  Ditchfield,  315.    'The  play  in 

s  Cf.  Capulet,  vs\  Romeo  and  Juliet,  this   village   is   performed  in  most 

i.  5. 28  '  A  hah,  a  hall  !  give  room  !  approved  fashion,  as  the  Rector  has 

and  foot  it,   girls ' ;  and  Puck  who  taken  the  matter  in  hand,  coached 

precedes   the   dance    of   fairies  in  the  actors  in  their  parts,  and  taught 

Midsummer Night 's Dream,v.  1. 396  them  some  elocution.'     This   sort 

'  I  am  sent  with  broom  before,  of  thing,  of  course,  is  soon  fatal  to 

To  sweep  the  dust  behind  the  folk-drama. 


door, 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  217 

logue,  the  fighters  are  introduced.  They  stand  in  a  clump 
outside  the  circle,  and  in  turns  step  forward  and  strut  round 
it l.  Each  is  announced,  by  himself  or  by  his  predecessor  or 
by  the  presenter,  with  a  set  of  rhymes  closely  parallel  to 
those  used  in  the  sword-dances.  With  the  fighters  generally 
comes  the  '  King  of  Egypt '  (occasionally  corrupted  into  the 
1  King  of  England '),  and  the  description  of  St.  George  often 
contains  an  allusion  to  his  fight  with  the  dragon  and  the 
rescue  of  Sabra,  the  King  of  Egypt's  daughter.  In  one  or 
two  of  the  northern  versions  (Newcastle,  Whitehaven)  the 
King  of  Egypt  is  a  fighter ;  generally  he  stands  by.  In 
one  of  the  Dorset  versions  (A)  he  is  called  '  Anthony.' 
Sabra  appears  only  in  Cornwall,  and  keeps  silence.  The 
Dragon  fights  with  St.  George  in  Cornwall,  and  also,  as  we 
have  seen,  in  the  curious  Brill  milie.  , ^_ 

The  performance,  naturally,  ends  with  a  quite,  This  takes 
various  forms.  Sometimes  the  presenter,  or  the  whole  body 
of  actors,  comes  forward,  and  wishes  prosperity  to  the  house- 
hold. Beelzebub,  with  his  frying-pan  or  ladle,  goes  round  to 
gather  in  the  contributions.  In  the  version  preserved  in 
Sharpe  s  London  Magazine,  this  is  the  function  of  a  special 
personage,  '  Boxholder.'  In  a  considerable  number  of  cases, 
however,  the  quite  is  preceded  by  a  singular  action  on  the 
part  of  Little  Devil  Dout.  He  enters  with  his  broom,  and 
threatens  to  sweep  the  whole  party  out,  or  '  into  their  graves,' 
if  money  is  not  given.  In  Shropshire  and  Staffordshire  he 
sweeps  up  the  hearth,  and  the  custom  is  probably  connected 
with  the  superstition  that  it  is  unlucky  to  remove  fire  or 
ashes  from  the  house  on  Christmas  Day.  '  Dout '  appears 
to  be  a  corruption  of  '  Do  out  V 

Another  way  of  working  in  the  grotesques  and  other  super- 
numeraries is  to  give  them  minor  parts  in  the  drama  itself. 
Father  Christmas  or  the  King  of  Egypt  is  utilized  as  a  sort 

1  Burne-Jackson,  484  ;  Manly,  i.  Christmas  song,  sung  by  '  Little 
289.  David  Daubt '  with  black  face,  skin 

2  Burne-Jackson,  402,  410  ;  F.  L.  jcoat  and  broom.  At  Bradford  they 
iv.  162  ;  Dyer,  504.  The  broom  is  ;  '  sweep  out  the  Old  Year ' ;  at 
used  in  Christmas  and  New  Year  Wakefield  they  sweep  up  dirty 
quetes  in  Scotland  and  Yorkshire,  hearths.  In  these  cases  the  notion 
even  when  there  is  no  drama,  of  threatening  to  do  the  unlucky 
Northall    205,  gives  a  Lancashire  thing  has  gone. 


218  FOLK  DRAMA 

of  chorus,  to  cheer  on  the  fighters,  lament  the  vanquished,  and 
summon  the  Doctor.  At  Newbold  the  woman,  called  '  Moll 
Finney,'  plays  a  similar  part,  as  mother  of  the  Turkish  Knight. 
At  Stoke  Gabriel,  Devon,  the  woman  is  the  Doctor's  wife l. 
Finally,  in  three  cases,  a  complete  subordinate  dramatic  epi- 
sode is  introduced  for  their  sake.  At  Islip,  after  the  main 
drama  is  concluded,  the  presenter  Molly  suddenly  becomes 
King  George's  wife  'Susannah.'  She  falls  ill,  and  the  Doctor's 
services  are  requisitioned  to  cure  her.  The  Doctor  rides  in, 
not  on  a  hobby-horse,  but  on  one  of  the  disengaged 
characters  who  plays  the  part  of  a  horse.  In  Dorsetshire 
the  secondary  drama  is  quite  elaborate.  In  the  'A'  version 
'  Old  Bet '  calls  herself  •  Dame  Dorothy,'  and  is  the  wife  of 
Father  Christmas,  named,  for  the  nonce,  '  Jan.'  They  quarrel 
about  a  Jack  hare,  which  he  wants  fried  and  she  wants 
roasted.  He  kills  her,  and  at  the  happy  moment  the  Doctor 
is  passing  by,  and  brings  her  to  life  again.  Version  '  B '  is 
very  similar,  except  that  the  performance  closes  by  Old  Bet 
bringing  in  the  hobby-horse  for  Father  Christmas  to  mount. 

I  do  not  think  that  I  need  further  labour  the  affiliation  of 
the  St.  George  plays  to  the  sword-dances.  Placed  in  a  series, 
as  I  have  placed  them  in  these  chapters,  the  two  sets  of  per- 
formances show  a  sufficiently  obvious  continuity.  They  are 
held  together  by  the  use  of  the  swords,  by  their  common 
grotesques,  and  by  the  episode  of  the  Doctor,  which  connects 
them  also  with  the  German  Shrovetide  and  Whitsun  folk- 
ceremonies.  They  are  /properly  called  folk-drama,  because 
they  are  derived,  with  the  minimum  of  literary  intervention, 
from  the  dramatic  tendencies  latent  in  folk-festivals  of  a  very 
primitive  type.  They  are  the  outcome  of  the  instinct  of  play, 
manipulating  for  its  own  purposes  the  mock  sacrifice  and 
other  ddbris  of  extinct  ritual.  Their  central  incident  symbo- 
lizes the  renouveau,  the  annual  death  of  the  year  or  the  fertili- 
zation spirit  and  its  annual  resurrection  in  spring 2.     To  this 

1  Ditchfield,  12.    An  '  Old  Bet '  castle  chap-book  promises  a' Dives' 

is  mentioned  in  5  N.  Q.  iv.  511,  as  who  never  appears.     Was  this  the 

belonging  to  a  Belper  version.  The  woman  ?     In  the  Linton  in  Craven 

woman  is  worked  in  with  various  sword-dance,   she  has   the   similar 

ingenuity,  but  several  versions  have  name  of  '  Miser.' 

lost  her.    The  prologue  to  the  New-  2  I  hardly  like  to  trace  a  remi- 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  219 

have  become  attached  some  of  those  heroic  cantilenae  which, 
as  the  early  mediaeval  chroniclers  tell  us,  existed  in  the  mouths 
of  the  chori  iuvemim  side  by  side  with  the  cantilenae  of  the 
minstrels.  The  symbolism  of  the  renouveau  is  preserved 
unmistakably  enough  in  the  episode  of  the  Doctor,  but  the 
cantilenae  have  been  to  some  extent  modified  by  the^compara- 
tively  late  literary  element,  due  perhaps  to  that  universa 
go-between  of  literature  and  the  folk,  the  village  school- 
master. The  genuine  national  heroes,  a  Stercatherus  or  a 
Galgacus,  have  given  way  to  the  'worthies'  and  the  'champions 
of  Christendom,'  dear  to  Holophernes.  The  literary  tradition 
has  also  perhaps  contributed  to  the  transformation  of  the 
chorus  or  semi-dramatic  dance  into  drama  pure  and  simple. 
In  the  St.  George  plays  dancing  holds  a  very  subordinate 
place,  far  more  so  than  in  the  '  Plow-boys '  play  of  Rev 
Dances  and  songs  are  occasionally  introduced  before  the 
quite,  but  rarely  during  the  main  performance.  In  the  eccen- 
tric Brill  version,  however,  a  complete  morris-dance  appears. 
And  of  course  it  must  be  borne  in  mind  that  the  fighting 
itself,  with  its  gestures  and  pacings  round  the  circle  and 
clashing  of  swords,  has  much  more  the  ejffect^of  a  sword- 
dance^  than  of  a  jugular  fight.  So  far  asit  is  a  fight,  the 
question  arises^  whether  we  ought  to_gee_-iri_i|,  besides  the 
heroic  element  introduced  by  the  cantilenae,  any  trace  of  the 
mimic  contest  b^w^enjwjntgr  -and.,  sum mer,  which  is  found 
here  and  there,  alternating  with  the  resurreCtion~3rama,  as 


niscence  of  the  connexion  with  the  Cf.  Thomas  Hardy,  The  Return  of 

renouveau  in  the  '  General  Valen-  the  Native,  bk.  ii.  ch.  3  :  '  The  girls 

tine'    and    'Colonel   Spring'  who  could  never  be  brought  to  respect 

fight  and  are  slain  in  the  Dorset  (A)  tradition  in  designing  and  decorat- 

version  ;   but  there  the  names  are.  ing  the  armour :  they  insisted  on 

Mr.  Gomme  {Nature  for  Dec.  23,  attaching   loops   and  bows  of  silk 

1897)   finds    in  certain  mumming  and  velvet  in  any  situation  pleasing 

costumes  preserved  in  the  Anthro-  to  their  taste.     Gorget,  gusset,  bas- 

pological    Museum    at    Cambridge  sinet,  cuirass,  gauntlet,  sleeve,  all 

and  made  of  paper  scales,  a  repre-  alike  in  the  view  of  these  feminine 

sentation  of  leaves  of  trees.     Mr.  eyes  were  practicable  spaces  whereon 

Ordish,  I  believe,  finds  in  them  the  to  sew  scraps  of  fluttering  colour.' The 

scales  of  the  dragon  (F.  L.  iv.  163).  usual  costume  of  the  sword-dancers, 

Some  scepticism  may  be  permitted  as   we   have   seen    (p.  200),  was  a 

as  to   these   conjectures.     Injnjisi  clean  white   smock,  and  probably 

places    the   dress   represents   little  that  of  the  mummers  is  based  upon 

but  rustic  notions  of  the  ornamental,  this. 


220  FOLK  DRAMA 

a  symbolical  representation  of  the  renouveau.  The  fight  does 
not,  of  course,  in  itself  stand  in  any  need  of  such  an  explana- 
tion ;  but  it  is  suggested  by  a  singular  passage  which  in 
several  versions  is  put  in  the  mouth  of  one  or  other  of  the 
heroes.  St.  George,  or  the  Slasher,  or  the  Turkish  Knight, 
is  made  to  boast  something  as  follows  : 

'  My  arms  are  made  of  iron,  my  body 's  made  of  steel, 
My  head  is  made  of  beaten  brass,  no  man  can  make  me  feel.' 

It  does  not  much  matter  who  speaks  these  words  in  the 
versions  of  Holophernes,  but  there  are  those  who  think  that 
they  originally  belonged  to  the  representative  of  winter,  and 
contained  an  allusion  to  the  hardness  of  the  frost-bound  earth1. 
Personally  I  do  not  see  why  they  should  refer  to  anything  but 
the  armour  which  a  champion  might  reasonably  be  supposed 
to  wear. 

A  curious  thing  about  the  St.  George  play  is  the  width  of 
its  range.  All  the  versions,  with  the  possible  exception  of  that 
found  at  Brill,  seem  to  be  derived  from  a  common  type.  They 
are  spread  over  England,  Wales,  Scotland  and  Ireland,  and 
only  in  the  eastern  counties  do  they  give  way  to  the  partly, 
though  not  wholly,  independent  Plough  Monday  type.  Un- 
fortunately, the  degeneracy  of  the  texts  is  such  that  any  closer 
investigation  into  their  inter-relations  or  into  the  origin  and 
transmission  of  the  archetype  would  probably  be  futile. 
Something,  however,  must  be  said  as  to  the  prominence,  at 
any  rate  outside  Scotland,  of  the  character  of  St.  George.  As 
far  as  I  can  see,  the  play  owes  nothing  at  all  to  John  Kirke's 
stage-play  of  The  Seven  Champions  of  Christendom,  printed 
in  1630^  It  is  possible,  however,  that  it  may  be  a  develop- 
ment of  a  sword-dance  in  which,  as  in  the  Shetland  dance,  the 
'  seven  champions '  had  usurped  the  place  of  more  primitive 
heroes.     If  so  the  six  champions,  other  than  St.  George,  have 

1  T.  F.  Ordish,  in  F.  L.  iv.  158.  worth    Smith,   was    amongst    the 

2  Printed  in  The  Old  English  manuscripts  destroyed  by  War- 
Drama  (1830),  vol.  iii.  Burne-Jack-  burton's  cook,  and  a  Bartholomew 
son,  490,  think  that  '  the  masque  Fair  '  drolP'  of  St.  George  and 
owes  something  to  the  play,'  but  the  Dragon  is  alluded  to  in  the 
the  resemblances  they  trace  are  Theatre  of  Compliments,  1688 
infinitesimal.     A  play  of  St.  George  (Fleay,    C.  H.    ii.    25 1  ;    Hazlitt, 

for  England,  by  William  or  Went-     Manual,  201). 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY 


221 


singularly  vanished  l.  In  any  case,  there  can  have  been  no 
'  seven  champions,'  either  in  sword-dance  or  mummers'  play, 
before  Richard  Johnson  brought  together  the  scattered  legends 
of  the  national  heroes  in  his  History  of  the  Seven  Champions 
in  1596  2.  This  fact  presents  no  difficulty,  for  the  archetype 
of  our  texts  need  certainly  not  be  earlier  than  the  seventeenth 
century  3.  By  this  time  the  literary  dramatic  tradition  was 
fully  established,  even  in  the  provinces,  and  it  may  well  have  I 
occurred  to  Holophernes  to  convert  the  sword-dance  into  the 
semblance  of  a  regular  play. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  mediaeval  period  had  its  dramatic 
or  semi-dramatic  performances  in  which  St.  George  figured, 
and  possibly  it  is  to  these,  and  not  to  the  '  seven  champions,' 
that  his  introduction  into  the  sword-dance  is  due.  These 
performances  generally  took  the  form  of  a  '  riding '  or  proces- 


1  In  the  Dorset  (A)  version,  the 
king  of  Egypt  is  '  Anthony '  and  the 
doctor  '  Mr.  Martin  Dennis.'  Con- 
ceivably these  are  reminiscences  of 
St.  Anthony  of  Padua  and  St.  Denys 
of  France.  The  Revesby  Plough 
Monday  play  (cf.  p.  208)  has  also 
an  '  Anthony.'  The  '  Seven  Cham- 
pions '  do  not  appear  in  the  English 
sword-dances  described  in  ch.ix,  but 
the  morris-dancers  at  Edgemond 
wake  used  to  take  that  name  (Burne- 
Jackson,  491).  Mrs.  Nina  Sharp 
writes  in  F.  L.  R.  iii.  I.  113  :  '  I  was 
staying  at  Minety,  near  Malmes- 
bury,  in  Wilts  (my  cousin  is  the 
vicar),  when  the  mummers  came 
round  (1876).  They  went  through 
a  dancing  fight  in  two  lines  opposed 
to  each  other — performed  by  the 
Seven  Champions  of  Christendom. 
There  was  no  St.  George,  and  they 
did  not  appear  to  have  heard  of  the 
Dragon.  When  I  inquired  for  him, 
they  went  through  the  performance 
of  drawing  a  tooth — the  tooth  pro- 
duced, after  great  agony,  being  a 
horse's.  The  mummers  then  carried 
into  the  hall  a  bush  gaily  decorated 
with  coloured  ribbons  .  .  .  [They] 
were  all  in  white  smock  frocks  and 
masks.  At  Acomb,  near  York,  I 
saw  very  similar  mummers  a  few 
years  ago,  but  they  distinguished 


St.  George,  and  the  Dragon  was  a 
prominent  person.  There  was  the 
same  tooth-drawing,  and  I  think  the 
Dragon  was  the  patient,  a;id  was 
brought  back  to  life  by  the  opera- 
tion.' I  wonder  whether  the  '  Seven 
Champions'  were  named  or  whether 
Mrs.  Sharp  inferred  them.  Any- 
how, there  could  not  have  been 
seven  at  Minety,  without  St.  George. 
The  'bush'  is  an  interesting  fea- 
ture. According  to  C.  R.  Smith, 
Isle  of  Wight  Words  {Eng.Dial.Soc. 
xxxii.  63)  the  mummers  are  known 
in  Kent  as  the  '  Seven  Champions.' 

2  Entered  on  the  Stationers1  Re- 
gisters in  1596.  The  first  extant 
edition  is  dated  1597.  Johnson  first 
introduced  Sabra,  princess  of  Egypt, 
into  the  story;  in  the  mediaeval 
versions,  the  heroine  is  an  unnamed 
princess  of  Silena  in  Libya.  The 
mummers' play  follows  Johnson,  and 
makes  it  Egypt.  On  Johnson  was 
based  Heylin's  History  of  St.  George 
(1631  and  1633),  and  on  one  or  both 
of  these  Kirke's  play. 

3  Jackson  and  Burne,  489: '  Miss 
L.  Toulmin  Smith  .  .  .  considers 
that  the  diction  and  composition  of 
the  [Shropshire]  piece,  as  we  now 
have  it,  date  mainly  from  the  seven- 
teenth century.' 


} 


222  FOLK  DRAMA 

sion  on  St.  George's  day,  April  33.  Such  ridings  may,  of 
course,  have  originally,  like  the  Godiva  processions  or  the 
midsummer  shows,  have  preserved  the  memory  of  the  pre- 
Christian  perambulations  of  the  fields  in  spring,  but  during 
the  period  for  which  records  are  available  they  were  rather 
municipal  celebrations  of  a  semi-ecclesiastical  type.  St.  George 
was  the  patron  saint  of  England,  and  his  day  was  hon6ured 
as  one  of  the  greater  feasts,  notably  at  court,  where  the 
chivalric  order  of  the  Garter  was  under  his  protection  1.  The 
conduct  of  the  ridings  was  generally,  from  the  end  of  the 
fourteenth  century  onwards,  in  the  hands  of  a  guild,  founded 
not  as  a  trade  guild,  but  as  a  half  social,  ha^f  religious  fraternity, 
for  the  worship  of  the  saint,  and  the  mutual  aid  and  good 
fellowship  of  its  members.  The  fullest  accounts  preserved 
are  from INorwlcEj where  the  guild  or  company  of  St.  George 
was  founded  in  1385,  received  a  charter  from  Henry  V  in  1416, 
and  by  1451  had  obtained  a  predominant  share  in  the  govern- 
ment of  the  city  2.  The  records  of  this  guild  throw  a  good 
deal  of  light  on  the  riding.  The  brethren  and  '  sustren '  had 
a  chapel  in  the  choir  of  the  cathedral,  and  after  the  Reforma- 
tion held  their  feasts  in  a  chapel  of  the  common  hall  of  the 
city,  which  had  formerly  been  the  church  of  a  Dominican 
convent.  The  riding  was  already  established  by  1408  when 
the  court  of  the  guild  ordered  that  '  the  George  shall  go  in 
procession  and  make  a  conflict  with  the  Dragon  and  keep  his 
estate  both  days.'  The  George  was  a  man  in  '  coat  armour 
beaten  with  silver,'  and  had  his  club-bearer,  henchmen,  min- 
strels and  banners.  He  was  accompanied  by  the  Dragon,  the 
guild-priest,  and  the  court  and  brethren  of  the  guild  in  red 
and  white  capes  and  gowns.  The  procession  went  to  'the 
wood '  outside  the  city,  and  here  doubtless  the  conflict  with 
the  dragon  took  place.     By  1537  there  had  been  added  to  the 


1  Dyer,  193  ;  Anstis,  Register  of  tices  Illustrative  of  Municipal  Pa- 
the  Garler(l724),'n.  38 ;  E.  Ashmole,  geants  and  Processions  (with  plates, 
Hist,  of  the  Garter  (ed.  1672),  188,  publ.  C.  Muskett,  Norwich,  1850) ; 
467  ;  (ed.  1715),  130,  410.  Toulmin     Smith,    English     Gilds 

2  F.  Blomefield,  Hist,  of  Norfolk  (E.  E.  T.  S.),  17,  443  ;  Kelly,  48. 
(1805),  iv.  6,  347  ;  Mackerell,  MS.  Hudson  andTingey,  Cal.  of  Records 
Hist,  of  Norfolk  (1737),  quoted  in  of  Norwich  (1898),  calendar  many 
Norfolk  Archaeology y  iii.  315  ;  No-  documents  of  the  guild. 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY  223 

dramatis  personae  St.  Margaret,  also  called  '  the  lady/  who 
apparently  aided  St.  George  in  his  enterprise1.  Strange  to 
say,  the  guild  survived  the  Reformation.  In  1553,  tFe  court" 
ordered,  '  there  shall  be  neither  George  nor  Margaret,  but  for 
pastime  the  dragon  to  come  and  show  himself,  as  in  other 
years.'  But  the  feast  continued,  and  in  spite  of  an  attempt 
to  get  rid  of  him  under  the  Long  Parliament,  the  Dragon 
endured  until  1733  when  the  guild  was  dissolved.  Eighteenth- 
century  witnesses  describe  the  procession  as  it  then  existed. 
The  Dragon  was  carried  by  a  man  concealed  in  its  body.  It 
was  of  basket  work  and  painted  cloth,  and  could  move  or 
spread  its  wings,  and  distend  or  contract  its  head.  The  ranks 
were  kept  by  '  whifflers '  who  juggled  with  their  swords,  and 
by  '  Dick  Fools,'  in  motley  and  decked  with  cats'  tails  and 
small  bells.  There  is  one  more  point  of  interest  about  the 
Norwich  guild.  In  the  fifteenth  centurynrFln^Iu^ed~manv 
persons  of  distinction  in  Norfolk.  Sir  John  Fastolf  gave  it 
an  'angell  silver  and  guy  It.'  And  amongst  the  members  in 
1496  was  Sir  John  Paston.  I  have  already  quoted  the  lament 
in  the  Paston  Letters  over  William  Woode,  the  keeper,  whom 
the  writer  'kepyd  thys  iij  yer  to  pleye  Seynt  Jorge  and 
Robyn  Hod  and  the  Shryff  off  Nottyngham,'  and  who  at 
a  critical  moment  went  off  to  Bernysdale  and  left  his  master 
in  the  lurch  2.  I  have  also  identified  his  Robin  Hood  play, 
and  now  it  becomes  apparent  where  he  played  '  Seynt  Jorge.' 
It  is  curious  how  the  fragments  of  the  wreckage  of  time  fit 
into  one  another.  The  riding  of  the  George  is  not  peculiar 
to  Norwich.  We  find  it  at  Leicester3,  at  Coventry4,  at_Strat 


1  Hartland,  iii.  58,  citing  Jacobus  men  in  1424.  Probably  there  was 
a  Voragine,  Legenda  Aurea,  xciii,  a  riding.  In  any  case,  at  the 
gives  the  story  of  St.  Margaret,  and  visit  of  Prince  Edward  in  1474, 
the  appearance  of  the  devil  to  her  there  was  a  pageant  or  mystire 
in  the  shape  of  a  dragon.  She  was  mimd  '  upon  the  Conddite  in  the 
in  his  mouth,  but  made  the  sign  of  Crosse  Chepyng'  of  '  seint  George 
the  cross,  and  he  burst  asunder.  armed  and  Kynges  doughf  knelyng 

2  Cf.  p.  177.  afore  hym  wl  a  lambe  and  the  fader 

3  Kelly,  37.  The  '  dressyng  of  and  the  moder  beyng  in  a  toure 
the  dragon'  appears  in  the  town  a  boven  beholdyng  seint  George 
accounts  for  1536.  The  guild  had  savyng  their  doughf  from  the 
dropped  the  riding,  even  before  the  dragon.'  There  was  a  similar  pa- 
Reformation,  geant  at  the  visit  of  Prince  Arthur 

4  Harris,  97,  190,  277  ;  Kelly,  41.  in  1498. 
The  guild  was  formed  by  journey- 


224  FOLK  DRAMA 

ford^.at  Chester2,  at  York,  at  Dublin3.  An  elaborate  pro- 
gramme for  the  Dublin  procession  is  preserved.  It  included 
an  emperor  and  empress  with  their  train,  St.  George  on  horse- 
back, the  dragon  led  by  aline  and  the  king  and  queen  of  Dele. 
But  no  princess  is  mentioned.  The  '  may  '  or  maiden  figured 
at  York,  however,  and  there  was  also  a  St.  Christopher.  At 
other  places,  such  as  Reading,  Aston  4  and  Louth  5,  an  eques- 
trian figure,  called  a  '  George,'  is  known  to  have  stood  on 
a  ' loft '  in  the  church,  and  here,  too,  an  annual  '  riding '  may 
be  presumed. 

There  is  no  jproof  that  the  dramatic  element  in  these 
'  ridings '  was  anything  more  than  a  mystfre  minii,  or 
pageant  in  dumb  show.  On  the  other  hand,  there  were  places 
where  the  performance  on  St.  George's  day  took  the  form 
of  a  regular  miracle-play.  I  The  performance  described  by 
Collier  as  taking  place  before  Henry  V  and  the  Emperor 
Sigismund  at  Windsor  in  141 6  turns  out  on  examination  of 
Collier's  authority  to  be  really  a  '  soteltie,'  a  cake  or  raised 
pie  of  elaborate  form.  But  the  town  of  Lydd  had  its 
St.  George  play  in  1456,  and  probably  throughout  the 
century  ;  while  in  1490  the  chaplain  of  the  guild  of  St.  George 
at  New  Romney  went  to  see  this  Lydd  play  with  a  view  to 
reproducing  it  at  the  sister  town.  In  151 1  again  a  play  of 
St.  George  is  recorded  to  have  been  held  at  Bassingbourne  in 
Cambridgeshire,  not  on  St.  George's,  but  on  St.  Margaret's  day6. 

Obviously  the   subject-matter   of  all  these   pageants  anoL 
miracles  was  provided  by  the  familiar  ecclesiastical  legend  of_ 


f5-'  kelly^ST'  Hist,  of  Reading,  221,  the  account 

8   Morris,    139,    168;     Fenwick,  for  setting-up  a  'George'  in  1 536. 

Hist,   of  Chester,  372  ;  Dyer,  195.  Dugdale,    Hist,  of  Warwickshire, 

The  Fraternity  of  St.  George  was  928,   has     a    notice    of    a    legacy 

founded  for  the  encouragement  of  in  1526  by  John  Arden  to  Aston 

shooting  in  1537.     They  had  a  cha-  church  of  his  '  white  harneis  ...  for 

pel  with  a  George  in  the  choir  of  a  George  to  were  it,  and  to  stand 

St.  Peter's.      St.  George's  was  the  on  his  pewe,  a  place  made  for  it.' 
great  day  for  races  on  the  Rood-  5  R.W.  Goulding,  Louth  Records, 

dee.     In   1610  was  a  famous  show,  quotes  from  the  churchwardens' ac- 

wherein  St.  George  was  attended  by  counts  for  1538  payments  for  taking 

Fame,  Mercury,  and  various  allego-  down  the  image  of  St.  George  and 

rical  figures.  his  horse. 

Cf.  Representations,  s.  v.  York,  8  Representations,  s.  v.  Windsor, 

Dublin.  Lydd,     New     Romney,     Bassing- 

4  Dyer,  194,  gives  from  Coates,  bourne. 


■■    Du 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY 


St.  George  the  dragon-slayer,  with  which  was  occasionally 
interwoven  the  parallel  legend  of  St.  Margaret1.  Similar 
performances  can  be  traced  on  the  continent.  There  was  one 
at  Mons  called  le  luniegon2.  Rabelais  describes  one  at  Metz, 
of  which,  however,  the  hero  was  not  St.  George,  but  yet 
another  dragon -slayer,  St.  Clement3.  There  is  no  need  to 
ascribe  to  them  a  folk^origiru-akhough  tEalldragnn-siaying 
champion  is. a.  common  per§pnagp_ln  fnlV-talf4,  |They  belong 
to  the  cycle  of  religious  drama,  which  is  dealt  with  in  the 
second  volume  of  this  book.'  And  although  in  Shropshire 
at  least  they  seem  to  have  been  preserved  in  a  village  stage- 


1  For  the  legend,  see  Acta  Sanc- 
torum, April,  iii.  101 ;  Jacobus  a 
Voragine,  Legenda  Aurea  (1280), 
Iviii  ;  E.  A.  W.  Budge,  The  Martyr- 
dom and  Miracles  of  St.  George 
of  Cappadocia :  the  Coptic  Texts 
(Oriental  Text  Series,  1888).  In 
Rudder,  Hist,  of  Gloucestershire, 
461,  and  Gloucester  F.  L.  47,  is 
printed  an  English  version  of  the 
legend,  apparently  used  for  read- 
ing in  church  on  the  Sunday 
preceding  St.  George's  day,  April 
23.  Cf.  also  Gibbon  (ed.  Bury),  ii. 
472,  568 ;  Hartland,  Perseus,  iii.  38 ; 
Baring-Gould,  Curious  Myths  of  the 
Middle  Ages,  266 ;  Zockler,  s.  v. 
St.  Georg,  in  Herzog  and  Plitt's 
Encyclopedia;  F.  Gorres,  Ritter 
St.  Georg  {n  Geschichte,  Legende 
undKunst,'mZeitschriftfurwissen- 
schaftliche  Theologie,xxx  (1887),  54; 
F.  Vetter,  Introduction  to  Reimbot 
von  Durne's  Der  heilige  Georg 
(1896 '.  Gibbon  identified  St. George 
with  the  Arian  bishop  George  of 
Cappadocia,  and  the  dragon  with 
Athanasius.  This  view  has  been 
recently  revived  with  much  learning 
by  J.  Friedrich  in  Sitzb.  Akad.  Wiss. 
Munchen  (phil.-h2st.JCl.),  1 899,  ii.  2. 
Pope  Gelasius  (t495)  condemned 
the  Passio  as  apocryphal  and  here- 
tical, but  he  admits  the  historical 
existence  of  the  saint,  whose  cult 
indeed  was  well  established  both  in 
East  and  West  in  the  fifth  century. 
Budge  tries  to  find  an  historical 
basis  for  him  in  a  young  man  at 

CHAMBERS.    I  ( 


Nicomedia  who  tore  down  an  edict 
during  the  persecution  of  Diocletian 
(+3°3)>  an<l  identifies  his  torturer 
Dadianus  with  the  co-emperor 
Galerius. 

2  Du  Menl,  La  Com.  98.  He 
quotes  Novidius,  Sacri  Fasti  (ed. 
1559),  bk.  vi.  f.  48™: 

'perque  annos  duci  monet  [rex] 
in  spectacula  casum 
unde      datur     multis     annua 
scena  locis.' 
A       fifteenth-century       Augsburg 
miracle-play     of     St.     George     is 
printed  by  Keller,  Fastnachtsspiele, 
No.  125  ;  for  other  Continental  data 
cf.  Creizenach,  i.  231,  246;    Julle- 
ville,  Les  Myst.  ii.  10,  644  ;    D'An- 
cona.  i.  104. 

3  Rabelais,  Gargantua,  iv.  59. 
The  dragon  was  called  Graoully, 
and  snapped  its  jaws,  like  the 
Norwich  '  snap-dragons  '  and  the 
English  hobby-horse. 

4  Cf.  p.  138.  The  myth  has 
attached  itself  to  other  undoubtedly 
historical  persons  besides  St.George 
(Bury,  Gibbon,  ii.  569).  In  his  case 
it  is  possibly  due  to  a  misunderstood 
bit  of  rhetoric.  In  the  Coptic  version 
of  the  legend  edited  by  Budge 
(p.  223),  Dadianus  is  called  'the 
dragon  of  the  abyss.'  There  is  no 
literal  dragon  in  this  version  :  the 
princess  is  perhaps  represented  by 
Alexandra,  the  wife  of  Dadianus, 
whom  George  converts.  Cf.  Hart- 
land,  Perseus,  iii.  44. 


226  FOLK  DRAMA 

play  up  to  quite  a  recent  date  \  they  obviously  do  not  directly 
survive  in  the  folk-play  with  which  we  are  concerned.  As 
far  as  I  know,  that  nowhere  takes  place  on  St.  George's  day. 
The  Dragon  is  very  rarely  a  character,  and  though  St.  George's 
traditional  exploit  is  generally  mentioned,  it  is,  as  that  very 
mention  shows,  not  the  motive  of  the  action.  On  the 
other  hand  the  legend,  in  its  mediaeval  form,  has  no  room  for 
the  episode  of  the  Doctor 2.  At  the  same  time  the  Dragon 
does  sometimes  occur,  and  the  traditional  exploit  is  mentioned, 
and  therefore  if  any  one  chooses  to  say  that  the  fame  of 
St.  George  in  the  guild  celebrations  as  well  as  the  fame  of  the 
'  seven  champions '  romance  determined  his  choice  as  the  hero 
of  the  later  sword-dance  rhymes,  I  do  not  see  that  there  is 
much  to  urge  against  the  view  3. 

With  regard  to  the  main  drift  of  this  chapter,  the  criticism 
presents  itself;  if  the  folk-plays  are  essentially  a  celebration 
of  the  renouveau  of  spring,  how  is  it  that  the  performances 
generally  take  place  in  mid-winter  at  Christmas  ?  The  answer 
is  that,  as  will  be  shown  in  the  next  chapter,  none  of  the 
Christmas  folk-customs  are  proper  to  mid-winter.  They  have 
been  attracted  by  the  ecclesiastical  feast  from  the  seasons 
which  in  the  old  European  calendar  preceded  and  followed  it, 
from  the  beginning  of  winter  and  the  beginning  of  summer  or 
spring.  The  folk-play  has  come  with  the  rest.  But  the 
transference  has  not  invariably  taken  place.  The  Norfolk 
versions  belong  not  to  Christmas  but  to  Plough  Monday, 
which  lies  immediately  outside  the  Christmas  season  proper, 
and  is  indeed,  though  probably  dislocated  from  its  primitive 
date,  the  earliest  of  the  spring  feasts.  The  St.  George  play 
itself  is  occasionally  performed  at  Easter,  and  even  perhaps  on 
May-day,  whilst  versions,  which  in  their  present  form  contain 
clear  allusions  to  Christmas,  yet  betray  another  origin  by  the 
title  which  they  bear  of  the  '  Pace-eggers"  or  '  Pasque-eggers" 


1  Cf.  ch.  xxiv,  as  to  these  plays.  years.     But  I  do  not  think  that  this 

2  I  ought  perhaps  to  say  that  in  episode  occurs  in  any  of  the  Euro- 
one  of  the  Coptic  versions  of  the  pean  versions  of  the  legend, 
legend   St.  George   is   periodically  3  '  Sant  George  and  the  dragon ' 
slain  and  brought  back  to  life  by  are  introduced  into  a  London  May- 
a  miracle  during  the  space  of  seven  game  in  1559  (ch.  viii). 


THE  MUMMERS'  PLAY 


227 


play1.  Christmas,  however,  has  given  to  the  play  the  charac- 
teristic figure  of  Old  Father  Christmas.  And  the  players  are 
known  as  '  mummers  '  and  '  guisers,'  or,  in  Cornwall,  '  geese- 
dancers,'  because  their  performance  was  regarded  as  a  variety 
of  the  'mumming'  or  'disguising'  which,  as  we  shall  see, 
became  a  regular  name  for  the  Christmas  revel  or  quite  2. 


1  See  the  Manchester  Peace  Egg 
chap-book.  At  Manchester,  Lang- 
dale,  and,  I  believe,  Coniston,  the 
play  is  performed  at  Easter:  cf. 
Halliwell,  Popular  Rhymes,  231. 
The  Steyning  play  is  believed  to 
have  been  given  at  May-day  as  well 
as  Christmas.  Of  course,  so  far  as 
this  goes,the  transference  might  have 
been  from  Christmas,  not  to  Christ- 
mas, but  the  German  analogies 
point  the  other  way.  The  Cheshire 
performance  on  All  Souls'  Day 
(Nov.  2),  mentioned  by  Child,  v. 
291,  is,  so  far  as  I  know,  exceptional. 

2  Cf.   ch.  xvii :    In  the    Isle    of 


Wight  the  performers  are  called 
the  '  Christmas  Boys  '  (C.  R.  Smith, 
Isle  of  Wight  Words,  in  E.  D.  S. 
xxxii.  63).  The  terms '  Seven  Cham- 
pions'  (Kent)  and  'John  Jacks' 
(Salisbury)  have  already  been  ex- 
plained. The  Steyning  '  Tipteers  ' 
or  '  Tipteerers '  may  be  named  from 
the  'tips'  collected  in  the  quite. 
The  '  Guisers '  of  Staffordshire  be- 
come on  the  Shropshire  border 
'  Morris-dancers,5  '  Murry-dancers,' 
or  '  Merry-dancers  '  —  a  further 
proof  of  the  essential  identity  of 
the  morris-  or  sword-dance  with  the 
play. 


Q2 


CHAPTER  XI 
THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 

{Bibliographical  Note. — I  have  largely  followed  the  conclusions  of 
A.  Tille,  Deutsche  Weihnacht  (1893)  and  Yule  and  Christmas  (1899). 
The  Roman  winter  feasts  are  well  treated  by  J.  Marquardt  and  T. 
Mommsen,  Handbuch  der  romischen  Alterthiimer  (3rd  ed.  1 881-8),  vol.  vii ; 
W.  W.  Fowler,  The  Roman  Festivals  of  the  Period  of  the  Republic  (1899) ; 
G.  Wissowa,  Religion  und  Kultus  der  Rbyier  (1902);  and  the  Christian 
feasts  by  L.  Duchesne,  Origines  du  Culte  chritien  (2nd  ed.  1898).  On 
the  history  of  Christmas,  H.  Usener,  Das  Weihnachtsfest,  in  Religions- 
geschichtliche  Untersuchungen,  vol.  i  (1889),  and  F.  C.  Conybeare's  intro- 
duction to  The  Key.  of  Truth  (1898)  should  also  be  consulted.  Much 
information  on  the  Kalends  customs  is  collected  by  M.  Lipenius,  Strenarum 
Historia,  in  J.  G.  Graevius,  Thesaurus  Antiquitatum  Romanarum  (1699), 
vol.  xii.  I  have  brought  together  a  number  of  ecclesiastical  references  to 
the  Kalends,  from  the  third  to  the  eleventh  century,  in  Appendix  N.] 

So  far  this  study  has  concerned  itself,  on  the  one  hand 
with  the  general  character  of  the  peasant  festivals,  on  the 
other  with  the  special  history  of  such  of  these  as  fall  within 
the  summer  cycle  of  the  agricultural  year,  from  ploughing  to 
harvest.  The  remaining  chapters  will  approach  the  corre- 
sponding festivals,  centring  around  Christmas,  of  winter. 
These  present  a  somewhat  more  difficult  problem,  partly 
because  their  elements  are  not  quite  so  plainly  agricultural, 
partly  because  of  the  remarkable  dislocations  which  the 
development  and  clash  of  civilizations  have  brought  about. 

It  must,  I  think,  be  taken  as  established  that  the  Germano- 
Keltic  tribes  had  no  primitive  mid-winter  feast,  corresponding 
directly  to  the  modern  Christmas1.  They  had  no  solstitial 
feast,  for  they  knew  nothing  of  the  solstices.  And  although 
they  had  a  winter  feast  of  the  dead,  belonging  rather  to  the 
domestic  than  to  the  elemental  side  of  cult,  this  probably 
fell  not  at  the  middle,  but  at  the  beginning  of  the  season. 
It  was  an  aspect  in  the  great  feast  with  which  not  the  winter 
only  but  the  Germano-Keltic  year  began.     This  took  place 

1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  78,  107  ;  Rhys,  C.  AT.  519  :  cf.  ch.  v. 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER  229 

when  the  advance  of  snow  and  frost  drove  the  warriors  back 
from  foray  and  the  cattle  from  the  pastures.  The  scarcity  of 
fodder  made  the  stall-feeding  of  the  whole  herd  an  im- 
possibility, and  there  was  therefore  an  economic  reason  for 
a  great  slaughtering.  This  in  its  turn  led  to  a  great  banquet 
on  the  fresh  meat,  and  to  a  great  sacrifice,  accompanied  with 
the  usual  perambulations,  water-rites  and  fire-rites  which 
sacrifice  to  the  deities  of  field  and  flock  entailed 1.  The 
vegetation  spirit  would  again  be  abroad,  no  longer,  as  in 
spring  or  summer,  in  the  form  of  flowers  and  fresh  green 
boughs,  but  in  that  of  the  last  sheaf  or  '  kern-baby '  saved 
from  harvest,  or  in  that  of  such  evergreens  or  rarer  blossoms 
as  might  chance  to  brave  the  snows.  The  particular  '  inten- 
tion '  of  the  festival  would  be  to  secure  the  bounty  of  the 
divine  powers  for  the  coming  year,  and  a  natural  superstition 
would  find  omens  for  the  whole  period  in  the  events  of  the 
initial  day.  The  feast,  however,  would  be  domestic,  as  well 
as  seasonal.  The  fire  on  the  hearth  was  made  '  new,'  and 
beside  it  the  fathers,  resting  from  the  toils  of  war,  or  herding 
or  tillage,  held  jollification  with  their  children.  Nor  were 
the  dead  forgotten.  Minni  were  drunk  in  honour  of  ances- 
tors and  ancestral  deities ;  and  a  share  of  the  banquet  was 
laid  out  for  such  of  these  as  might  be  expected,  in  the  whirl 
of  the  wintry  storm,  to  revisit  the  familiar  house-place. 

Originally,  no  doubt,  the  time  of  the  feast  was  determined 
by  the  actual  closing  of  the  war- ways  and  the  pastures.  Just 
as  the  first  violet  or  some  migratory  bird  of  March  was 
hailed  for  the  herald  of  summer,  so  the  first  fall  of  snow  gave 
the  signal  that  winter  was  at  hand  2.  In  the  continental  home 
of  the  Germano-Keltic  tribes  amongst  the  forests  of  central 
Europe  this  would  take  place  with  some  regularity  about  the 
middle  of  November 3.  A  fixed  date  for  the  feast  could  only 
arise  when,  at  some  undefined  time,  the  first  calendar,  the 
'  three-score-day-tide  '  calendar  of  unknown  origin,  was  intro- 

1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  18  ;  D.  W.  6.  rent.' 

Bede,Z?.  T.R.  15,  gives  Blot-monath  2  Burton,  15,  notes  a  tradition  at 

as  the  Anglo-Saxon  name  for  No-  Disley,  in  Cheshire,  that  the  local 

vember,  and  explains  it  as  '  mensis  wake  was  formerly  held  after  the 

immolationum,  quia  in  ea   pecora  first  fall  of  snow, 

quae  occisuri  erant,  Diis  suis  vove-  3  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  18. 


230 


FOLK  DRAMA 


duced  1.  Probably  it  was  thenceforward  held  regularly  upon  a 
day  corresponding  to  either  November  the  nth  or  the  12th  in 
our  reckoning.  If  it  is  accurately  represented  by  St.  Martin's 
day,  it  was  the  nth2,  if  by  the  Manx  Samhain,  the  12th3. 
It  continued  to  begin  the  year,  and  also  the  first  of  the  six 
tides  into  which  that  year  was  divided.  As  good  fortune  will 
have  it,  the  name  of  that  tide  is  preserved  to  us  in  the  Gothic 
term  Iiuleis  for  November  and  December4,  in  the  Anglo- 
Saxon  Giuli  or  Geola  which,  according  to  Bede,  applied  both  to 
December  and  to  January 5,  and  in  Yule,  the  popular  designa- 
tion, both  in  England  and  Scandinavia,  of  Christmas  itself6. 
The  meaning  of  this  name  is,  however,  more  doubtful.  The 
older  philology,  with  solstices  running  in  its  brain,  supposed 
that  it  applied  primarily  to  a  mid-winter  feast,  and  con- 
nected it  with  the  Anglo-Saxon  hweol,  a  wheel7.  Bede 
himself,  learned  in  Roman  lore,  seems  to  hint  at  such  an 
explanation  8.     The  current  modern  explanation  derives  the 


1  Mogk,  iii.  391  ;  Tille,  Y.  and  C. 
24,  find  the  winter  feast  in  the  festival 
of  Tanfana  which  the  Marsi  were 
celebrating  when  Germanicus  at- 
tacked them  in  A.  D.  14  (Tacitus, 
Ann.  i.  51).  Winter,  though  immi- 
nent, had  not  yet  actually  set  in, 
but  this  might  be  the  case  in  any 
year  after  the  festival  had  come  to 
be  determined  by  a  fixed  calendar. 

8  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  57. 

3  Rhys,  C.  H.  513,  says  that  the 
Samhain  fell  on  Nov.  1.  The  pre- 
ceding night  was  known  as  Nos 
Galan-geaf,  the  'night  of  winter 
calends,'  and  that  following  as  Dy' 
gwyl  y  Meirw,  '  the  feast  of  the 
Dead.'  In  F.  L.  ii.  308  he  gives 
the  date  of  the  Manx  Samhain  as 
Nov.  12,  and  explains  this  as  being 
Nov.  1,  O.  S.  But  is  it  not  really 
the  original  date  of  the  feast  which 
has  been  shifted  elsewhere  to  the 
beginning  of  the  month  ? 

4  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  12,  citing  M. 
Heyne,  Ulfilas,  226:  'In  a  Gothic 
calendarium  of  the  sixth  century 
November,  or  Naubaimbair,  is  called 

fruma  Iiuleis,  which  presupposes 
that  December  was  called  *aftuma 
Iiuleis.' 


6  Bede,  de  temp.  rat.  c.  15.  Tille, 
Y.  and  C.  20,  points  out  that  the 
application  of  the  old  tide-name  to 
fit  November  and  December  by  the 
Goths  and  December  and  January 
by  the  Anglo-Saxons  is  fair  evidence 
for  the  belief  that  the  tide  itself 
corresponded  to  a  period  from  mid- 
November  to  mid-January. 

6  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  147.  The  terms 
gehhol,  gedhel,  geol,  giul,  Ml,  &c. 
signify  the  Christmas  festival  season 
from  the  ninth  century  onwards,  and 
from  the  eleventh  also  Christmas 
Day  itself.  The  fifteenth-century 
forms  are  Yule,  Ywle,  Yole,  Ymvle. 
In  the  A.-S.  Chronicle  the  terms 
used  for  Christmas  are '  midewinter,' 
'  Cristes  meessa,'  '  Cristes  tyde,' 
'  Natiuitedh.'  As  a  single  word 
'  Cristesmesse'  appears  first  in  1131 
(Tille,  Y.  andC.  159).  The  German 
'  Weihnacht '  (M.  H.  G.  wich, '  holy ') 
appears  1 1000  (Tille,  D.  W.  22). 

7  Pfannenschmidt,  238,  512. 

8  The  notion  is  of  a  circular  course 
of  the  sun,  passing  through  the  four 
turning-  or  wheeling-points  of  the 
solstices  and  equinoxes.  Cf.  ch.  vi 
for  the  use  of  the  wheel  as  a  solar 
symbol. 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 


231 


word  from  a  supposed  Germanic  jehwela,  equivalent  to  the 
Latin  ioculns l.  It  would  thus  mean  simply  a  '  feast '  or 
'  rejoicing,'  and  some  support  seems  to  be  lent  to  this  de- 
rivation by  the  occasional  use  of  the  English  '  yule  '  and  the 
Keltic  gwyl  to  denote  feasts  other  than  that  of  winter 2. 
Other  good  authorities,  however,  prefer  to  trace  it  to  a 
Germanic  root  jeula-  from  which  is  derived  the  Old  Norse  //, 
'  a  snowstorm';  and  this  also,  so  far  as  its  application  to  the 
feast  and  tide  of  winter  is  concerned,  seems  plausible  enough  3. 
It  is  possible  that  to  the  winter  feast  originally  belonged  the 
term  applied  by  Bede  to  December  24  of  Modranicht  or 
Modraneht^.  It  would  be  tempting  to  interpret  this  as  •  the 
night  which  gives  birth  to  the  year';  but  philologists  say 
that  it  can  only  mean  '  night  of  mothers,'  and  we  must  there- 
fore explain  it  as  due  to  some  cult  of  the  Matres  or  triad  of 
mother-goddesses,  which  took  place  at  the  feast  5. 
1Mogk,  iii.  391,  quoting  Kluge,     412,  421,  515,  and  in  F.  L.  ii.  305, 


Englische  Studien,  ix.  311,  and 
Bugge,  Ark.f.  nord.  Filolog.  iv.  135. 
Tille,  Y.  and  C.  8,  148,  desirous  to 
establish  an  Oriental  origin  for  the 
Three  Score  Day  tides,  doubts  the 
equation  *jehwela  =  ioculus,  and 
suggests  a  connexion  between  the 
Teutonic  terms  and  the  old  Cypriote 
names  tkaios,iov\aios,lov\ir)os,iov\ios 
for  the  period  Dec.  22  to  Jan.  23  (K. 

F.  Hermann,  Uber  griech.  Monats- 
kunde,  64),  and,  more  hesitatingly, 
with  the  Greek  "lovXos  or  hymn  to 
Ceres.  Weinhold,  Deutsche  Monats- 
namen,  4 ;  Deutsche  Jahrteilung,  1 5, 
thinks  that  both  the  Teutonic  and 
Cypriote  names  are  the  Roman 
Julius  transferred  from  mid-summer 
to  mid-winter.  Northall,  208,  makes 
yule  =  ol,  oel,  a  feast  or  '  ale,'  for 
which  I  suppose  there  is  nothing  to 
be  said.  Skeat,  Etym.  Diet.  s.  v., 
makes  it  'a  time  of  revelry,'  and 
connects  with  M.E.  youlen,  yollen, 
to  'yawl'  or  'yell,'  and  with  A.-S. 
gylan,  Dutch  joelen,  to  make  merry, 

G.  jolen,  jodeln,  to  sing  out.  He 
thus  gets  in  a  different  way  much 
the  sense  given  in  the  text. 

2  At  a  Cots  wold  Whitsun  ale  a 
lord  and  lady  '  of  yule '  were  chosen 
{Gloucester  F.  L.  56).     Rhys,  C  H. 


gives  Gwyl  as  a  Welsh  term  for 
'  feast '  in  general,  and  in  particular 
mentions,  besides  the  Gwyl yMeirw 
at  the  Samhain,  the  Gwyl  Aust 
(Aug.  1,  Lammas  or  Lugnassad 
Day).  This  also  appears  in  Latin 
as  the  Gula  Augusti  (Ducange,  s.v. 
temp.  Edw.  Ill),  and  in  English  as 
'  the  Gule  of  August'  (Hearne,  Robert 
of  Gloucester 's  Chron.  679).  Tille, 
Y.  and  C.  56,  declares  that  Gula 
here  is  only  a  mutilation  of  Vincula, 
Aug.  1  being  in  the  ecclesiastical 
calendar  the  feast  of  St.  Peter  ad 
Vincula. 

8  Kluge  and  Lutz,  English  Ety- 
mology, s.  v.  Yule. 

*  Bede,  D.  T.  R.  c.  15  '  ipsam 
noctem  nobis  sacrosanctam,  tunc 
gentili  vocabulo  Modranicht  [v.l. 
Modraneht],  id  est,  matrum  noctem 
appellabant ;  ob  causam  ut  suspi- 
camur  ceremoniarum,  quas  in  ea 
pervigiles  agebant.' 

6  Mogk,  iii.391.  Tille,  YandC. 
152,  gives  some  earlier  explana- 
tions, criticizes  that  of  Mogk,  and 
offers  as  his  own  a  reference  to  a 
custom  of  baking  a  cake  (placenta) 
to  represent  the  physical  mother- 
hood of  the  Virgin.  The  practice 
doubtless    existed    and  was    con- 


232  FOLK  DRAMA 

The  subsequent  history  of  the  winter  feast  consists  in  its 
gradual  dislocation  from  the  original  mid-November  position, 
and  dispersion  over  a  large  number  of  dates  covering  roughly 
the  whole  period  between  Michaelmas  and  Twelfth  night. 
For  this  process  a  variety  of  causes  are  responsible.  Some 
of  these  are  economic.  As  civilization  progressed,  mid- 
November  came  to  be,  less  than  of  old,  a  signal  turning-point 
in  the  year.  In  certain  districts  to  which  the  Germano-Keltic 
tribes  penetrated,  in  Gaul,  for  instance,  or  in  Britain  with  its 
insular  climate,  the  winter  tarried,  and  the  regular  central 
European  closing  of  the  pastures  was  no  longer  a  law.  Then 
again  tillage  came  gradually  to  equal  or  outstrip  pasturage  in 
importance,  and  the  year  of  tillage  closed,  even  in  Germany, 
at  the  end  of  September  rather  than  in  mid-November.  The 
harvest  feast  began  to  throw  the  winter  feast  rather  into  the 
shade  as  a  wind-up  of  the  year's  agricultural  labours.  This 
same  development  of  tillage,  together  with  the  more  scientific 
management  of  pasturage  itself,  did  more.  It  provided  a 
supply  of  fodder  for  the  cattle,  and  by  making  stall-feeding 
possible  put  off  further  and  further  into  the  winter  the  neces- 
sity of  the  great  annual  slaughter.  The  importance  in 
Germany,  side  by  side  with  St.  Martin's  day  (November  n), 
of  St.  Andrew's  day  (November  30),  and  still  more  St. 
Nicholas'  day  (December  6)  1)  as  folk-feasts,  seems  to  suggest 
a  consequent  tendency  to  a  gradual  shifting  of  the  winter 
festival. 

These  economic  causes  came  gradually  into  operation 
throughout  a  number  of  centuries.  In  displacing  the  Novem- 
ber feast,  they  prepared  the  way  for  and  assisted  the  action 
of  one  still  more  important.  This  was  the  influence  of  Roman 
usage.     When   the   Germano-Keltic   tribes   first   came   into 

demned  by  Pope  Hormisdas  (514-  the    Virgin,    here    as     elsewhere, 

23),    by    the    Lateran    Council    of  taking  over  the  cult  of  the  mother- 

649,  the  Council  of  Hatfield  (680),  goddesses. 

and  the  Trullan  Council  (692).    But  *  Tille,    Y.  and  C.  65.      In   his 

Bede    must    have    known   this   as  earlier  book  D.  W.  7,  29,  Dr.  Tille 

a  Christian  abuse,  and  he  is  quite  held  the  view  that  there  had  always 

plainly  speaking  of  a  pre-Christian  been  a  second  winter  feast  about 

custom.     J.   M.  Neale,  Essays   in  three  weeks   after  the    first,  when 

Liturgiology  (1867),  5  n,  says,  '  In  the  males  held  over  for  breeding 

most   Celtic   languages   Christmas  were  slain, 
eve  is   called  the  night  of  Mary,' 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER  233 

contact  with  the  Roman  world,  the  beginning  of  the  Roman 
year  was  still,  nominally  at  least,  upon  the  Kalends,  or  first 
of  March.  This  did  not,  so  far  as  I  know,  leave  any  traces 
upon  the  practice  of  the  barbarians  *.  In  45  B.C.  the  Julian 
calendar  replaced  the  Kalends  of  March  by  those  of  January. 
During  the  century  and  a  half  that  followed,  Gaul  became 
largely  and  Britain  partially  Romanized,  while  there  was 
a  steady  infiltration  of  Roman  customs  and  ideas  amongst 
the  German  tribes  about  and  even  far  beyond  the  Rhine. 
With  other  elements  of  the  southern  civilization  came  the 
Roman  calendar  which  largely  replaced  the  older  Germanic 
calendar  of  three-score-day-tides.  The  old  winter  festival 
fell  in  the  middle  of  a  Roman  month,  and  a  tendency  set 
in  to  transfer  the  whole  or  a  part  of  its  customs  either 
to  the  beginning  of  this  month  2  or,  more  usually,  to  the 
beginning  of  the  Roman  year,  a  month  and  a  half  later. 
This  process  was  doubtless  helped  by  the  fact  that  the 
Roman  New  Year  customs  were  not  in  their  origin,  or  even 
at  the  period  of  contact,  essentially  different  from  those  of 
their  more  northerly  cousins.  It  remained,  of  course,  a 
partial  and  incomplete  one.  In  Gaul,  where  the  Roman 
influence  was  strongest,  it  probably  reached  its  maximum. 
But  in  Germany  the  days  of  St.  Martin3  and  St.  Nicholas4 
have  fully  maintained  their  position  as  folk-feasts  by  the  side 
of  New  Year's  day,  and  even  Christmas  itself;  while  St. 
Martin's  day  at  least  has  never  been  quite  forgotten  in  our 
islands5.      The    state    of  transition    is   represented   by  the 

1  According  to  Bede,  D.  T.  R.  Christmas  only  replaced  the  days 
c.  1 5,  the  Anglo-Saxons  hadadopted  of  St.  Martin  and  St.  Nicholas  as  a 
the  system  of  intercalary  months  German  children's  festival  in  the 
which  belongs  to  the  pre-Julian  and  sixteenth  century. 

not   the  Julian   Roman    calendar.  6  Tille,  K  andC.  34,65 ;  Pfannen- 

But  Bede's  chapter  is  full  of  con-  schmidt,  206;  Dyer,  418;  N.Drake, 

fusions  :  cf.  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  145.  Shakespeare  and  his  Times  (1838), 

2  All  Saints'  day  or  Hallowmas  93.  Martinmas  was  a  favourite 
(November  1)  and  All  Souls'  day  Anglo-Saxon  and  mediaeval  legal 
(November  2)  have  largely,  though  term.  It  survived  also  as  a  tradi- 
not  wholly,  absorbed  the  November  tional '  tyme  of  slauchter '  for  cattle, 
feast  of  the  Dead.  '  Martlemas   beef  was  a  common 

3  Pfannenschmidt,  203;  Jahn,  term  for  salt  beef.  In  Scotland  a 
229;  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  21,  28,  36,  Mart  is  a  fat  cow  or  bullock,  but 
42,  57;  D.  IV.  23.  the  derivation  of  this  appears  to  be 

4  Tille,  D.  IV.  29 ;  Miiller,  239,  from  a  Celtic  word  Mart  =  cow. 
248.    According  to  Tille,  D.  W.  63, 


234  FOLK  DRAMA 

isolated  Keltic  district  known  as  the  Isle  of  Man.  Here, 
according  to  Professor  Rhys,  the  old  Samhain  or  Hollan- 
tide  day  of  November  12  is  still  regarded  by  many  of  the 
inhabitants  as  the  beginning  of  the  year.  Others  accept 
January  1  ;  and  there  is  considerable  division  of  opinion  as 
to  which  is  the  day  whereon  the  traditional  New  Year 
observances  should  properly  be  held  *. 

A  final  factor  in  the  dislocation  of  the  winter  feast  was  the 
introduction  of  Christianity,  and  in  especial  the  establishment 
of  the  great  ecclesiastical  celebration  of  Christmas.  When 
Christianity  first  began  to  claim  the  allegiance  of  the  Roman 
world,  the  rulers  of  the  Church  were  confronted  by  a  series  of 
southern  winter  feasts  which  together  made  the  latter  half 
of  December  and  the  beginning  of  January  into  one  continuous 
carnival.  The  nature  and  position  of  these  feasts  claim  a  brief 
attention. 

To  begin  with,  there  were  the  feasts  of  the  Sun.  The 
Bruma  (brevissima)  or  Brnmalia  was  held  on  November  24, 
as  the  day  which  ushered  in  the  period  of  the  year  during 
which  the  sun's  light  is  diminished.  This  seems  to  have  been 
a  beginning  of  winter  feast,  adopted  by  Rome  from  Thrace  2. 
The  term  bruma  was  also  sometimes  applied  to  the  whole 
period  between  November  24  and  the  solstice,  and  ultimately 
even  to  the  solstitial  day  itself,  fixed  somewhat  incorrectly  by 
the  Julian  calendar  on  December  25  s.  On  this  day  also  came 
a  festival,  which  probably  owed  its  origin  to  the  Emperor 
Aurelian  (270-75),  whose  mother  was  a  semi-Oriental  priestess 
of  the  Sun,  in  one  of  his  Syrian  forms  as  Baal  or  Belus4, 
and  who  instituted  an  official  cult  of  this  divinity  at  Rome 
with  a  temple  on  the  Quirinal,  a  collegium  of  pontifices,  and 
ludi  circenses  held  every  fourth  year5.  These  fell  on  the 
day  of  the  solstice,  which  from  the  lengthening  of  the  sun's 


1  Rhys,  in  F.  L.  ii.  308.  *  Cf.  p.  112. 

2  Mommsen,  C.  I.  L.  i2.  287  ;  5  Prefler,  ii.  408 ;  P.  Allard,  Ju- 
Pauly-Wissowa,  Real-Encycl.  s.  v.  lien  FApostat,  i.  16  ;  J.  ReVille,  La 
Bruma;Toma.schek,'mSiiz&.A&ad.  Religion  a  Rome  sous  les  Sdveres 
Wiss.  Wien,  be  (1869),  358.  (1885) ;  Wissowa,  306.     An  earlier 

3  Ovid,  Fasti,  i.  163  'bruma  novi  cult  of  the  same  type  introduced 
prima  est  veterisque  novissima  by  Elagabalus  did  not  survive  its 
solis.'  founder. 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 


235 


course  was  known  as  the  c  birthday '  of  Sol  Novus  or  Sol 
Invictus1.  This  cult  was  practised  by  Diocletian  and  by 
Constantine  before  his  conversion,  and  was  the  rallying-point 
of  Julian  in  his  reaction  against  Christianity^.  Moreover, 
the  Sol  Invictus  was  identified  with  the  central  figure  of  that 
curious  half-Oriental,  half-philosophical  worship  of  Mithra, 
which  at  one  time  threatened  to  become  a  serious  rival  to 
Christianity  as  the  religion  of  the  thinking  portion  of  the 
Roman  world  3.  That  an  important  Mithraic  feast  also  fell 
on  December  25  can  hardly  be  doubted,  although  there  is  no 
direct  evidence  of  the  fact 4. 

The  cult  of  the  Sol  Invictus  was  not  a  part  of  the  ancient 
Roman  religion,  and,  like  the  Brumalia,  the  solstitial  festival 
in  his  honour,  however  important  to  the  educated  and  official 
classes  of  the  empire,  was  not  a  folk-festival.  It  lay,  however, 
exactly  between  two  such  festivals.     The  Saturnalia  imme- 

1  The  earliest  reference  is  prob- 
ably that  in  the  calendar  of  the 
Greek  astronomer,  of  uncertain 
date,  Antiochus,  'HXi'ov  ycv£6\iov' 
av£fi  (pas  (Cumont,  i.  342,  from 
Cod.  Monac.  gr.  287,  f.  132).  The 
Fasti  of  Furius  Dionysius  Philo- 
calus  (a.d.  354)  have  vin.  kal. 
ian.  N[atalis]  invicti  C[ircenses] 
M[issus]  xxx'  (C.  I.  L.  i2.  278, 
338).  Cf.  Julian,  Orat.  4  (p.  156 
ed.  Spanheim)  evBtvs  nera  top 
TtXevTa'iop  tov  Kpovov  fxrjva  iroiovfitv 
17X10)  tov  nepi<papeo-TaTOv  aycova,  rfjv 
toprfjv  HXi'w  Kara(f>r)p.lo~avT(s  Avi- 
kt)t<p  ;  Corippus,  de  laud.  lust, 
min.  i.  314  '  Solis  honore  novi 
grati  spectacula  circi';  cf.  the 
Christian  references  on  p.  242. 
Mommsen's  Scriptor  Syrus  quoted 
C.  I.  L.  i2.  338  tells  us  that  lights 
were  used  ;  '  accenderunt  lumina 
festivitatis  causa.' 

2  Preller,  ii.  410;  Gibbon,  ii.  446. 
8  On  Mithraicism,  cf.  F.  Cumont, 

Textes  et  Monuments  relatifs  aux 
Mysteres  de  Mithra  (1896-9)  ;  also 
the  art.  by  the  same  writer  in 
Roscher's  Lexicon,  ii.  3028,  and  A. 
Gasquet,  Le  Culte  de  Mithra  (Re- 
vue des  Deux  Mondes  for  April  I, 
1899)  ;  J.  ReVille,  La  Religion  d 
Rome  sous  les  Se'veres,  yy ;  Wis- 


sowa,  307;  Preller,  ii.  410;  A. 
Gardner,  Julian  the  Apostate,  175  ; 
P.  Allard,  Julien  FApostat,  i.  18  ; 
ii.  232  ;  G.  Zippel,  Le  Taurobolium, 
in  Festschrift  f.  L.  Friedlander 
(1895),  498.  Mithra  was  originally 
a  form  of  the  Aryan  Sun-god,  who 
though  subordinated  in  the  Maz- 
dean  system  to  Ahoura  Mazda  con- 
tinued to  be  worshipped  by  the 
Persian  folk.  His  cult  made  its 
appearance  in  Rome  about  70  B.C., 
and  was  developed  during  the 
third  and  fourth  centuries  A.  D.  under 
philosophic  influences.  Mithra  was 
regarded  as  the  fount  of  all  life,  and 
the  yearly  obscuration  of  the  sun's 
forces  in  winter  became  a  hint  and 
promise  of  immortality  to  his  wor- 
shippers :  cf.  Carm.  adv.  paganos, 
47  '  qui  hibernum  docuit  sub  terra 
quaerere  solem.'  Mithraic  votive 
stones  have  been  found  in  all  parts 
of  the  empire,  Britain  included. 
They  are  inscribed  "'  Soli  Invicto,' 
'  Deo  Soli  Invicto  Mithrae,'  '  Nu- 
mini  Invicto  Soli  Mithrae,'  and  the 
like. 

4  Cumont,  Textes  et  Mon.  i.  325  ; 
ii.  66,  and  in  Roscher's  Lexicon, 
ii.  3065  ;  Lichtenberger,  Encycl.  des 
Sciences  religieuses,  s.  v.  Mithra. 


236  FOLK  DRAMA 

diately  preceded  it ;  a  few  days  later  followed  the  January 
Kalends. 

The  Saturnalia,  so  far  as  the  religious  feast  of  Saturn  was 
concerned,  took  place  on  December  17.  Augustus,  however, 
added  two  days  to  the  feriae  iudiciariae,  during  which  the 
law-courts  were  shut,  and  popular  usage  extended  the  festival 
to  seven.  Amongst  the  customs  practised  was  that  of  the 
sigillariorum  celebritas,  a  kind  of  fair,  at  which  the  sigillaria, 
little  clay  dolls  or  oscilla,  were  bought  and  given  as  presents. 
Originally,  perhaps,  these  oscilla  were  like  some  of  our  feasten 
cakes,  figures  of  dough.  Candles  (cerei  or  candelae)  appear 
also  to  have  been  given.  On  the  second  and  third  days  it 
was  customary  to  bathe  in  the  early  morning x.  But  the  chief 
characteristic  of  the  feast  was  the  licence  allowed  to  the  lower 
classes,  to  freedmen  and  to  slaves.  During  the  libertas 
Decetnbris  both  moral  and  social  restraints  were  thrown  off2. 
Masters  made  merry  with  their  servants,  and  consented  for 
the  time  to  be  on  a  footing  of  strict  equality  with  them  3. 
A  rex  Saturnalitius,  chosen  by  lot,  led  the  revels,  and  was 
entitled  to  claim  obedience  for  the  most  ludicrous  commands4. 

1  Preller,  R.  M.  ii.  15;  Momm-  '  unctis  falciferi  senis  diebus, 

sen,  in  C.  I.  L.  i2.  337  ;  Marquardt  ,  regnator    quibus    imperat   fritil- 

and  Mommsen,  Handbuch  der  rb-  lus.' 

mischen  Alterthiimer,v'\.  562  ;  Diet.  Lucian,   Saturnalia,^.  385,  intro- 

0/  CI.  A.  s. v.   Saturnalia;    Tille,  duces  a  dialogue  between  Saturn 

Y.    and  C,   85;    Frazer,  iii.    138;  and  his  priests.     Saturn  says  iirra 

W.  W.   Fowler,   268  ;    C.   Dezobry,  fiev  f]fiepa>v  tj   irava  fiaaiXeia,   kcu  fjv 

Rome  au  Siecle  d'Auguste  (ed.  4,  cKirpodecruos   tovtw  yevafiat,  I8id>rqs 

1 875)?  iii-  I40.  tvdvs  dpi,  koi  tov  ttoWov  drjuov  els' 

a  Horace,  Satires,  ii.  7.  4 :  ev    avrais    Sf    rals    ewra.    anovbaiov 

'  age,  libertate  Decembri,  y,ev  oiibev  ov&e  ayopaiov  SioutTjo-ao-daL 

quando    ita    maiores   voluerunt,  ftoi   o-vy«^tbfjrjTat,  iviveiv  Be   *a\  /tt«- 

utere ;    narra.'  6veiv   koX    fioav    Kai    irai£eiv    Kai  kv- 

8  The   democratic    character  of  (Seveiv  koX   apxovras  Kad'urravai   koi 

the  feast  is  brought  out  in  the  vop.01  roiis  olKtras  eia>xeiv  k<A  yvy.v6v  abeiv 

put     by    Lucian     (Luc.     Opp.     ed.  Kai  Kporelv  vnoTpepovra,  ivlore  be  Kai 

Jacobitz,  iii.  307  ;  Saturnalia,  p.  393)  is  vdmp  y\rvxpbv  iir\  Ke(pa\fjv  &&eitr6cu 

in  the   mouth  of  the  divinely  in-  ao-/3o\&)     Kexpi&pivov    to    7rp6o-(onov, 

Structed     vouoderr)!,     Chronosolon,  ravra  i<pelrai  p,oi  troielv  ;  and  again  : 

and  in  the  '  Letters  of  Saturn '  that  tvo>xa>peda  Be  tjBr)  ml  Kporafiev  ml 

follow.  in\    rrj    eoprij    iXevdepidCcop-ev^    eira 

4  According    to    Tacitus,    Ann.  irerrcxmixev  is  t6  apxalou  eiri  Kapvtov 

xiii.    15,    Nero    was    king    of   the  koX  fjao-ikias  xeiP°TOV«>p-c v  Kai  neiBap- 

Saturnalia  at  the  time  of  the  murder  x^P-fV  awoif  ovra>  yap  &v  tt\v  irapoi- 

of  Britannicus.     On  the  nature  of  ftiav  iira\r}0evaaip,i,  rj  (prjert,  iraXLuTrai- 

this    sovereignty,    cf.  Arrian,  Epi-  has   roiis   yepovras   yiyveo-dai.      The 

ctetus,  i.  25  ;  Martial,  xi.  6 :  ducking  is  curiously  suggestive  of 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER  237 

The  similarity  of  the  Saturnalia  to  the  folk-feasts  of 
western  Europe  will  be  at  once  apparent.  The  name  Saturnus 
seems  to  point  to  a  ploughing  and  sowing  festival,  although 
how  such  a  festival  came  to  be  held  in  mid-December  must 
be  matter  of  conjecture 1.  The  Kalends,  on  the  other  hand, 
are  clearly  a  New  Year  festival.  They  began  on  January  I, 
with  the  solemn  induction  of  the  new  consuls  into  office.  As 
in  the  case  of  the  Saturnalia,  the  feriae  lasted  for  more  than 
one  day,  covering  at  least  a  triduum.  The  third  day  was  the 
day  of  vota  or  solemn  wishes  of  prosperity  for  the  New  Year 
to  the  emperor.  The  houses  were  decked  with  lights  and 
greenery,  and  once  more  the  masters  drank  and  played  dice 
with  their  slaves.  The  resemblance  in  this  respect  between 
the  Kalends  and  the  Saturnalia  was  recognized  by  a  myth 
which  told  how  when  Saturn  came  bringing  the  gifts  of 
civilization  to  Italy  he  was  hospitably  received  by  Janus,  who 
then  reigned  in  the  land2.  Another  Kalends  custom,  the 
knowledge  of  which  we  owe  to  the  denunciations  of  the 
Fathers,  was  the  parading  of  the  city  by  bands  of  revellers 

western  festival  customs,  but  I  do  vii.  245;  Roscher,  Lexicon,  ii.  yj; 
not  feel  sure  whether  it  was  the  W.  W.  Fowler,  278 ;  Tille,  Y.  and 
image  of  Saturn  that  was  ducked  C.  84;  M.  Lipenius,  Strenarum 
or  the  rex  with  whom  he  appears  Historia  in  J.  G.  Graevius,  The- 
to  half,  and  only  half,  identify  saurus  Antiq.  Rom.  (1699),  xii. 
himself.  Frazer,  iii.  140,  lays  stress  409.  The  last-named  treatise  con- 
on  the  primitive  sacrificial  character  tains  a  quantity  of  information  set 
of  the  '  rex,'  who  is  said  still  to  out  with  some  obsolete  learning, 
have  been  annually  slain  in  Lower  The  most  important  contemporary 
Moesia  at  the  beginning  of  the  account  is  that  of  Libanius  (314- 
fourth  century  A.  D. ;  cf.  Acta  S.  t95)  in  his  sis  ras  ndKdvdas  and  his 
Dasii,  in  Acta  Bollandiana,  xvi.  Kahavh&v  eMppaais  (ed.  Reiske,  i. 
(1897),  5;  Parmentier  et  Cumont,  256;  iv.  1053;  cf.  Sievers,  Das 
Le  Rot  des  Saturnales,  in  R.  de  Leben  der  Libanius,  170,  204).  In 
Phitologie,  xxi  (1897),  143.  the  former  speech  he  says  ravrr^v 

1  Frazer,  iii.  144,  suggests  that  rfjv  (oprrjv  evpoi  t'  av  Ttrap.(vr)v  e(p' 
the  Saturnalia  may  once  have  been  airav,  oaov  17  'Papaiav  dpxn  rtrarai, 
in  February,  and  have  left  a  trace  in  the  latter,  p.lav  8t  oida  koivtjv 
of  themselves  in  the  similar  festival  airavrmv  onoaoi  (Sxriv  vno  ttjv  'Poj- 
of  the  female  slaves,  the  Matro-  paia>v  apxty.  Under  the  emperors, 
nalia,  on  March  1,  which,  like  the  who  made  much  of  the  strenae  and 
winter  feasts,  came  in  for  Chris-  vota,  the  importance  of  the  Kalends 
tian  censure ;  cf.  Appendix  N.  grew,  probably  at  the  expense  of 
No.  (i).  the  Saturnalia;  cf.  Macrobius,  Sa- 

2  Preller,  R.  M.  i.  64,  178;  ii.  turnalia,  i.  2.  1  'adsunt  feriae  quas 
13  ;  C.  Dezobry,  Rome  au  Steele  indulget  magna  pars  mensis  Iano 
d'Auguste  (ed.   4,    1875),  ii.   169;  dicati.' 

Mommsen  and  Marquardt,  vi.  545  ; 


238  FOLK  DRAMA 

dressed  in  women's  clothes  or  in  the  skins  of  animals.  And, 
finally,  a  series  of  superstitious  observances  testified  to  the 
belief  that  the  events  of  the  first  day  of  the  year  were 
ominous  for  those  of  the  year  itself.  A  table  loaded  all 
night  long  with  viands  was  to  ensure  abundance  of  food  ; 
such  necessaries  of  life  as  iron  and  fire  must  not  be  given 
or  lent  out  of  the  house,  lest  the  future  supply  of  them  should 
fail.  To  this  order  of  ideas  belonged,  ultimately  at  least,  if 
not  originally,  the  central  feature  of  the  whole  feast,  the 
strenae  or  presents  so  freely  exchanged  between  all  classes 
of  society  on  the  Kalends.  Once,  so  tradition  had  it,  the 
strenae  were  nothing  more  than  twigs  plucked  from  the  grove 
of  the  goddess  Strenia,  associated  with  Janus  in  the  feast 1  ; 
but  in  imperial  times  men  gave  honeyed  things,  that  the  year 
of  the  recipient  might  be  full  of  sweetness,  lamps  that  it  might 
be  full  of  light,  copper  and  silver  and  gold  that  wealth  might 
flow  in  amain  2. 

Naturally,  the  Fathers  were  not  slow  to  protest  against  these 
feasts,  and,  in  particular,  against  the  participation  in  them  of 
professing  Christians.  Tertullian  is,  as  usual,  explicit  and 
emphatic  in  his  condemnation3.  The  position  was  aggravated 
when,  probably  in  the  fourth  century,  the  Christian  feast  of 
the  Birthday  of  Christ  came  to  be  fixed  upon  December  25, 
in  the  very  heart  of  the  pagan  rejoicings  and  upon  the  actual 
day  hitherto  sacred  to  Sol  Invictus.  The  origin  of  Christmas 
is  wrapped  in  some  obscurity4.     The  earliest  notices  of  a 

1  Preller,  i.  180;  Mommsen  and  that  the  sweet  cakes  and  the  lamps 
Marquardt,  vi.  14;  vii.  245  ;  W.W.  like  the  verhenae  had  originally  a 
Fowler,  278;  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  84,  closer  connexion  with  the  rites  of 
104.  Strenia  was  interpreted  in  the  the  feast  than  that  of  mere  omens, 
sense  of  '  strenuous ' ;  cf.  Sym-  The  emperors  expected  liberal 
machus,  Epist.  x.  15  'ab  exortu  strenae,  and  from  them  the  cus- 
paene  urbis  Martiae  strenarum  usus  torn  passed  into  mediaeval  and 
adolevit  auctore  Tatio  rege,  qui  Renaissance  courts.  Queen  Eliza- 
verbenas  felicis  arboris  ex  luco  beth  received  sumptuous  new  year 
Streniae  anni  novi  auspices  primus  gifts  from  her  subjects.  For  a 
accepit.  .  .  .  Nomen  indicio  est  money  payment  the  later  empire 
viris^  strenuis  haec  convenire  vir-  used  the  term  KaXavftiKov  or  kalen- 
tute.'  Preller  calls  Strenia  a  Sabine  daticum.  Strenae  survives  in  the 
Segensgottin.  French  e'trennes  (M tiller,  150,  504). 

*  Mommsen  and  Marquardt,  vii.  3  Appendix  N,  Nos.  (i),  (ii). 

245  ;     Lipenius,    489.      The    gifts  *  The  most  recent  authorities  are 

were   often   inscribed   'anno   novo  Tille,    Y.  and  C.  119;  H.  Usener, 

faustum  felix  tibi.'     It  is  probable  Religionsgeschichtliche  Untersuch- 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 


239 


celebration  of  the  birth  of  Christ  in  the  eastern  Church  attach 
it  to  that  of  his  baptism  on  the  Epiphany.  This  feast  is  as 
old  as  the  second  century.  By  the  fourth  it  was  widespread 
in  the  East,  and  was  known  also  in  Gaul  and  probably  in 
northern  Italy 1.  At  Rome  it  cannot  be  traced  so  early ; 
but  it  was  generally  adopted  there  by  the  beginning  of  the 
fifth,  and  Augustine  blames  the  Donatists  for  rejecting  it, 
and  so  cutting  themselves  off  from  fellowship  with  the  East 2. 
Christmas,  on  the  other  hand,  made  its  appearance  first  at 
Rome,  and  the  East  only  gradually  and  somewhat  grudgingly 
accepted  it.  The  Paulician  Christians  of  Armenia  to  this  day 
continue  to  feast  the  birth  and  the  baptism  together  on 
January  6,  and  to  regard  the  normal  Christian  practice  as 
heretical.  An  exact  date  for  the  establishment  of  the  Roman 
feast  cannot  be  given,  for  the  theory  which  ascribed  it  to 
Pope  Liberius  in  353  has  been  shown  to  be  baseless  3.  But 
it  appears  from  a  document  of  336  that  the  beginning  of  the 
liturgical  year  then  already  fell  between   December  8   and 


ungen,  i,  Das  Weihnachtsfest 
(1889) ;  L.  Duchesne,  Origines  du 
Culte  chritien  (ed.  2,  1898),  247, 
and  in  Bulletin  critique  (1890), 
41  ;  F.  C.  Conybeare,  The  History 
of  Christmas,  in  American  Journal 
of  Theology  (1899),  iii.  1,  and  Intro- 
duction to  The  Key  of  Truth 
(1898);  F.  Cumont,  Textes  et 
Monuments  mithraiques,  i  (1899), 
342>  355-  I  have  not  been  able  to 
see  an  article  praised  by  Mr.  Cony- 
beare, in  P.  de  Lagarde,  Mitthei- 
lungen  (1890),  iv.  241. 

1  Conybeare,  Am.  J.  Th.  iii.  7, 
cites,  without  giving  exact  refer- 
ences, two  'north  Italian  homilies' 
of  the  fourth  century,  which  seem 
to  show  this. 

2  Sermo  ccn(P,L.  xxxviii.  1033). 

3  The  depositio  martyrum,  at- 
tached to  the  Fasti  of  Philocalus 
drawn  up  in  354,  opens  with  the 
entry  'viii  kl.  ianu.  natus  Christus 
in  Bethleem  Iudeae.'  December  25 
was  therefore  kept  as  the  birthday 
at  least  as  early  as  353.  Usener,  i. 
267,  argued  that  the  change  must 
have  taken  place  in  this  very  year, 
because  Liberius,  while  veiling  Mar- 


cellina,  the  sister  of  St.  Ambrose,  on 
the  Epiphany,  spoke  of  the  day  as 
'  natalem  Sponsi  tui '  (de  Virgini- 
bus,  iii.  1,  in  P.  L.  xvi.  219).  But  it 
is  not  proved  either  that  this  event 
took  place  in  363,  or  that  it  was  on 
Epiphany  rather  than  Christmas 
day.  Liberius  refers  to  the  Marriage 
at  Cana  and  the  Feeding  of  the  Five 
Thousand.  But  the  first  allusion  is 
directly  led  up  to  by  the  sponsalia 
of  Marcellina,  and  both  events, 
although  at  a  later  date  commemo- 
rated at  Epiphany,  may  have  be- 
longed to  Christmas  at  Rome,  before 
Epiphany  made  its  appearance  (Du- 
chesne, Bulletin  critique  (1890), 
41).  Usener  adds  that  Liberius 
built  the  Basilica  Liberii,  also 
known  as  Sta.  Maria  ad  Praesepe 
or  Sta.  Maria  Maggiore,  which  is 
still  a  great  station  for  the  Christmas 
ceremonies,  in  honour  of  the  new 
feast.  But  Duchesne  shows  that 
the  dedication  to  St.  Mary  only 
dates  from  a  rebuilding  in  the  fifth 
century,  that  the  praesepe  cannot 
be  traced  there  before  the  seventh, 
and  that  the  original  Christmas 
statio  was  at  St.  Peter's. 


240  FOLK  DRAMA 

ay1.  Christmas  may,  therefore,  be  assumed  to  have  been  in 
existence  at  least  by  336. 

It  would  seem,  then,  that  the  fourth  century  witnessed  ,the 
establishment,  both  at  Rome  and  elsewhere,  of  Christmas  and 
Epiphany  as  two  distinct  feasts,  whereas  only  one,  although 
probably  not  everywhere  the  same  one,  had  been  known 
before.  This  fact  is  hardly  to  be  explained  by  a  mere 
attempt  to  accommodate  varying  local  uses.  The  tradition 
of  the  Armenian  doctors,  who  stood  out  against  Christmas, 
asserts  that  their  opponents  removed  the  birthday  of  Christ 
from  January  6  out  of  'disobedience2.'  This  points  to  a 
doctrinal  reason  for  the  separate  celebration  of  the  birth  and 
the  baptism.  And  such  a  reason  may  perhaps  be  found  in 
the  Adoptionist  controversies.  The  joint  feast  appeared  to 
lend  credence  to  the  view,  considered  a  heresy,  but  still 
adhered  to  by  the  Armenian  Church,  that  Christ  was  God, 
not  from  his  mother's  womb,  but  only  from  his  adoption  or 
spiritual  birth  at  the  baptism  in  Jordan.  It  was  needful  that 
orthodox  Christians  should  celebrate  him  as  divine  from  the 
very  moment  of  his  carnal  birth  3. 

The  choice  of  December  25  as  the  day  for  the  Roman  feast 
cannot  be  supposed  to  rest  upon  any  authentic  tradition  as 
to  the  historic  date  of  the  Nativity.    It  is  one  of  several  early 

1  Duchesne,  Bulletin  critique  Sun.  However,whentheSonofGod 
(1890),  44.  This  document  also  was  born  of  the  Virgin,  they  cele- 
belongs  to  the  collection  of  Philo-  brated  the  same  feast,  although 
calus.  they  had  turned  from  their  idols  to 

2  Conybeare,  Key  of  Truth,  clii-  God.  And  when  their  bishops  {or 
clvii,  quoting  an  Armenian  bishop  primates)  saw  this,  they  proceeded 
Hippolytus  vbBodl.  Armen.  Marsh  to  take  the  Feast  of  the  Birth  of 
467,  f.  338  a,  '  as  many  as  were  dis-  Christ,  which  was  on  the  sixth  of 
obedient  have  divided  the  two  January,  and  placed  it  there  (viz. 
feasts.'  According  to  the  Catechism  on  Dec.  25).  And  they  abrogated 
of  the  Syrian  Doctors  in  the  same  the  feast  of  the  Sun,  because  it  (the 
MS.,  Sahak  asked  Afrem  why  the  Sun)  was  nothing,  as  we  said  before.' 
churches  feast  Dec.  25:  the  teacher  Mommsen,  C.  I.  L.  i2.  338,  quotes 
replied,  '  The  Roman  world  does  to  the  same  effect  another  Scriptor 
so  from  idolatry,  because  of  the  Syrus  (in  Assemanus,  Bibl.  Orient. 
worship  of  the  Sun.  And  on  the  ii.  164) :  cf.  p.  235.  The  early  apo- 
25th  of  Dec,  which  is  the  first  of  logists  (Tertullian,  Apol.  16;  ad 
Qanun ;  when  the  day  made  a  Nationes,  i.  13;  Origen,  contra 
beginning  out  of  the  darkness  they  Celsum,  viii.  67)  defend  Chris- 
feasted  the  Sun  with  great  joy,  and  tianity  against  pagan  charges  of 
declared  that  day  to  be  the  nuptials  Sun-worship. 

[? '  natals,'  but  cf.  p.  241,  n.  1]  of  the         3  Conybeare,/.  Am.  Th.  iii.  8. 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 


241 


patristic  guesses  on  the  subject.  It  is  not  at  all  improbable 
that  it  was  determined  by  an  attempt  to  adopt  some  of  the 
principal  Christian  festivals  to  the  solstices  and  equinoxes  of 
the  Roman  calendar1.  The  enemies  of  Roman  orthodoxy 
were  not  slow  to  assert  that  it  merely  continued  under 
another  name  the  pagan  celebration  of  the  birthday  of  Sol 
Invictus2.     Nor  was  the  suggestion  entirely  an  empty  one. 


1  Most  of  these  dates  were  in  the 
spring  (Duchesne,  247).  As  late 
as  1 243  the  Pseudo-Cyprianic  de 
Pascha  computus  gives  March  28. 
On  the  other  hand,  December  25 
is  given  early  in  the  third  century 
by  Hippoh/tus,  Comtn.  super 
Danielem,  iv.  23  (p.  243,  ed.  Bon- 
wetsch,  1897),  although  the  text 
has  been  suspected  of  interpolation 
(Hilgenfeld,  va.Berlin.phil.  Wochen- 
schrift,  1897,  p.  1324,  s.).  Ananias 
of  Shirak  (+  600-50),  Horn,  de 
Nat.  (transl.  in  Expositor,  Nov. 
1890),  says  that  the  followers  of 
Cerinthus  first  separated  the  birth 
and  baptism :  cf.  Conybeare,  Key  of 
Truth, cliv.  Thisisfurtherexplained 
by  Paul  of  Taron  (ob.  1123),  adv. 
Theopistum,  222  (quoted  Cony- 
beare, clvi),  who  says  that  Artemon 
calculated  the  dates  of  the  Annun- 
ciation as  March  25  and  the  Birth 
as  December  25,  'the  birth,  not 
however  of  the  Divine  Being,  but 
only  of  the  mere  man.'  Both  Cerin- 
thus (end  of  1st  cent.)  and  Artemon 
(t  202-17)  appear  to  have  held 
Adoptionist  tenets :  cf.  Schaff,  iv. 
465,  574.  Paul  adds  that  Artemon 
calculated  the  dates  from  those  for 
the  conception  and  nativity  of  John 
the  Baptist.  This  implies  that  St. 
John  Baptist's  day  was  already  June 
24  by  1 200.  It  was  traditional  on 
that  day  by  St.  Augustine's  time, 
1  Hoc  maiorum  traditione  suscepi- 
mus'  (Sermo  ccxcii.  1,  in  Migne, 
P.  Z.xxxviii.  1320).  The  six  months' 
interval  between  the  two  nativities 
may  be  inferred  from  St.  Luke  i. 
26.  St.  Augustine  refers  to  the 
symbolism  of  their  relation  to  each 
other,  and  quotes  with  regard  to 
their  position  on  the  solstices  the 
words   ascribed  to  the  Baptist  in 


St.  John  iii.  30  '  ilium  oportet  cre- 
scere,  me  autem  minui '  ( Sermo  cxciv. 
2;  cclxxxvii.  3;  cclxxxviii.  5;  Migne, 
P.  L.  xxxviii.  1016,  1302,  1306). 
Duchesne,  250,  conjectures  that  the 
varying  dates  of  West  (Dec.  25) 
and  East  (Jan.  6)  depended  on  a 
similar  variation  in  the  date  as- 
signed to  the  Passion,  it  being 
assumed  in  each  case  that  the  life 
of  Christ  must  have  been  a  com- 
plete circle,  and  that  therefore  he 
must  have  died  on  the  anniversary 
of  his  conception  in  the  womb. 
Thus  St.  Augustine  (in  Heptat.  ii. 
90)  upbraids  the  Jews, '  non  coques 
agnum  in  lacte  matris  suae.'  March 
25  was  widely  accepted  for  the 
Passion  from  Tertullian  onwards, 
and  certain  Montanists  held  to  the 
date  of  April  6.  Astronomy  makes 
it  impossible  that  March  25  can  be 
historically  correct,  and  therefore 
the  whole  calculation,  if  Duchesne 
is  right,  probably  started  from  an 
arbitrary  identification  of  a  Chris- 
tian date  with  the  spring  equinox, 
just  as,  if  Ananias  of  Shirak  is 
right,  it  started  from  a  similar 
identification  of  another  such  date 
with  the  summer  solstice.  But  it 
seems  just  as  likely  that  the  birth 
was  fixed  first,  and  the  Annuncia- 
tion and  St.  John  Baptist's  day 
calculated  back  from  that.  If  the 
Passion  had  been  the  starting-point, 
would  not  the  feast  of  Christmas, 
as  distinct  from  the  traditional  date 
for  the  event,  have  become  a  mov- 
able one  ? 

2  The  Armenian  criticism  just 
quoted  only  re-echoes  that  put  by 
St.  Augustine  in  the  mouth  of  the 
Manichaeans  in  Contra  Faustum, 
xx.  4  (Corp.  Script.  Eccl.  xxvj 
'  Faustus  dixit . . .  solemnes  gentium 


CHAMBERS. 


R 


242 


FOLK  DRAMA 


The  worshippers  of  Sol  Invictus,  and  in  particular  the 
Mithraic  sect,  were  not  quite  on  the  level  of  the  ordinary- 
pagans  by  tradition.  Mithraism  had  claims  to  be  a  serious 
and  reasonable  rival  to  Christianity,  and  if  its  adherents 
could  be  induced  by  argument  to  merge  their  worship  of 
the  physical  sun  in  that  of  the  '  Sun  of  Righteousness,'  they 
were  well  worth  winning1.  On  the  other  hand  there  were 
obvious  dangers  in  the  Roman  policy  which  were  not  wholly 
averted,  and  we  find  Leo  the  Great  condemning  certain 
superstitious  customs  amongst  his  flock  which  it  is  difficult 
to  distinguish  from  the  sun-worship  practised  alike  by  pagans 
and  by  Saint  Augustine's  heretical  opponents,  the  Mani- 
chaeans  2. 


dies  cum  ipsis  celebratis  ut  Kalen- 
das  et  solstitia.'  Augustine  answers 
other  criticisms  of  the  same  order 
in  the  course  of  the  book,  but  he 
does  not  take  up  this  one. 

1  Augustine,  in  his  sermons,  uses 
a  solar  symbolism  in  two  ways, 
besides  drawing  the  parallel  with 
St.  John  already  quoted.  Christ  is 
lux  e  tenebris  :  '  quoniam  ipsa  infi- 
delitas  quae  totum  mundum  vice 
noctis  obtexerat,  minuenda  fuerat 
fide  crescente ;  ideo  die  Natalis 
Domini  nostri  Iesu  Christi,  et  nox 
incipit  perpeti  detrimenta,  et  dies 
sumere  augmenta'  (Sermo  cxc.  I 
in  P.  L.  xxxviii.  1007).  He  is  also 
sponsus  procedens  de  thalamo  suo 
(Sermo  cxcii.  3  ;  cxcv.  3,  in  P.  L. 
xxxviii.  1013,  1018).  Following  this 
Caesarius  or  anothercalls  Christmas 
the  dies  nuptialis  Christi,  on  which 
'  sponsae  suae  Ecclesiae  adiunctus 
est '  (Serm.  Pseudo-Aug.  cxvi.  2,  in 
P.  L.  xxxix.  1975).  Cumont,  i.  355, 
gives  other  examples  of  Le  Soleil 
Symbole  du  Christ  from  an  early 
date,  and  especially  of  the  use  of 
the  phrase  Sol  Iustitiae  from 
Malachi,  iv.  2. 

2  Pseudo-Chrysostom  (Italian, 
4th  cent.),  de  solstitiis  et  aeqai- 
noctiis  {Op.  Chrys.  ed.  1588,  ii. 
118)  'Sed  et  dominus  nascitur 
mense  Decembri,  hiemis  tempore, 
viii  kal.  Ianuarias  .  .  .  Sed  et  in- 
victi  natalem  appellant.     Quis  uti- 


que  tarn  invictus  nisi  dominus  noster 
qui  Mortem  subactam  devicit  ?  vel 
quod  dicant  Solis  esse  natalem, 
ipse  est  Sol  iustitiae  de  quo  Mala- 
chias  propheta  dixit ' ;  St.  Augu- 
stine. Sermo  cxc.  1  (P.  L.  xxxviii. 
1007)  '  habeamus,  igitur,  fratres, 
solemnem  istum  diem ;  non  sicut 
infideles  propter  hunc  solem,  sed 
propter  eum  qui  fecit  hunc  solem ' ; 
Tract,  in  Iohann.  xxxiv.  2  (P.  L. 
xxxv.  1652)  'numquid  forte  Domi- 
nus Christus  est  Sol  iste  qui  ortu 
et  occasu  peragit  diem?  Non 
enim  defuerunt  heretici  qui  ita  sen- 
serunt  .  .  .  (c.  4)  ne  quis  carnaliter 
sapiens  solem  istum  intelligendum 
putaret ' ;  Pseudo-Ambrose  (per- 
haps Maximus  of  Turin,  t4i2- 
65),  Sermo  vi.  (P.  L.  xvii.  614) 
'  bene  quodammodo  sanctum  hunc 
diem  natalis  Domini  solem  novum 
vulgus  appellat  .  .  .  quod  libenter 
nobis  amplectendum  est ;  quia 
oriente  Salvatore  non  solum  hu- 
mani  generis  salus,  sed  etiam  solis 
ipsius  claritas  innovatur '  ;  Leo 
Magnus,  Sermo  xxii,  in  Nativ. 
Dom.  (P.  L.  liv.  198)  'Ne  idem 
ille  tentator,  cuius  iam  a  vobis 
dominationem  Christus  exclusit,  ali- 
quibus  vos  iterum  seducat  insidiis, 
et  haec  ipsa  praesentis  diei  gaudia 
suae  fallaciae  arte  corrumpat,  illu- 
dens  simplicioribus  animis  de  quo- 
rumdam  persuasione  pestifera,  qui- 
bus  haec  dies  solemnitatis  nostrae 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER 


243 


From  Rome  the  Christmas  feast  gradually  made  its  way 
over  East  and  West.  It  does  not  seem  to  have  reached 
Jerusalem  until  at  least  the  sixth  century,  and,  as  we  have 
seen,  the  outlying  Church  of  Armenia  never  adopted  it.  But 
it  was  established. at  Antioch  about  375  and  at  Alexandria 
about  430 x.  At  Constantinople  an  edict  of  400  included  it 
in  the  list  of  holy  days  upon  which  ludi  must  not  be  held  2. 
In  506  the  council  of  Agatha  recognized  the  Nativity  as  one 
of  the  great  days  of  the  Christian  year 3,  while  fasting  on 
that  day  was  forbidden  by  the  council  of  Braga  in  561  as 
savouring  of  Priscillianist  heresy  4.  The  feast  of  the  Epiphany, 
meanwhile,  was  relegated  to  a  secondary  place ;  but  it  was 
not  forgotten,  and  served  as  a  celebration,  in  addition  to  the 
baptism,  of  a  number  of  events  in  the  life  of  Christ,  which 
included  the  marriage  at  Cana  and  the  feeding  of  the  five 


non  tam  de  nativitate  Christi  quam 
de  novi,  ut  dicunt,  solis  ortu  honora- 
bilis  videatur ' ;  Sermo  xxvii,  in 
Nat.  Dom.  {P.  L.  liv.  218)  '  De 
talibus  institutis  etiam  ilia  generatur 
impietas  ut  sol  in  inchoatione  diurnae 
lucis  exsurgens  a  quibusdam  in- 
sipientioribus  de  locis  eminenti- 
oribus  adoretur ;  quod  nonnulli 
etiam  Christiani  adeo  se  religiose 
facere  putant,  ut  priusquam  ad  B. 
Petri  apostoli  basilicam,  quae  uni 
Deo  vivo  et  vero  est  dedicata,  per- 
veniant,  superatis  gradibus  quibus 
ad  suggestum  areae  superioris 
ascenditur,  converso  corpore  ad 
nascentem  se  solem  reflectant,  et 
curvatis  cervicibus,  in  honorem  se 
splendidi  orbis  inclinent.  Quod  fieri 
partim  ignorantiae  vitio,  partim 
paganitatis  spiritu,  multum  tabe- 
scimus  et  dolemus.'  Eusebius, 
Sermo  xxii.  7repi  do-rpovoficov  (P.  G. 
lxxxvi.  453), also  refers  to  the  adora- 
tion of  the  sun  by  professing  Chris- 
tians. The  '  tentator '  of  Leo  and 
the '  heretici '  of  Augustine  are  prob- 
ably Manichaeus  and  his  followers, 
against  whose  sun-worship  Augu- 
stine argues  at  length  in  Contra 
Faustum,  xx  {Corp.  Script.  Eccl. 
xxv). 

1  Duchesne,  248. 

2  Cf.  p.  14. 


3  C.  Agathense,c.2l  (Mansi,viii. 
328)  '  Pascha  vero,  natale  domini, 
epiphania,  ascensionem  domini, 
pentecostem,  et  natalem  S.  Ioannis 
Baptistae,  vel  si  qui  maximi  dies  in 
festivitatibus  habentur,  non  nisi  in 
civitatibus  aut  in  parochiis  teneant.' 

4  Cone.  Bracarense  (t56o),  Prop. 
4  (Mansi,  ix.  775)  '  Si  quis  natalem 
Christi  secundum  carnem  non  bene 
honorat,  sed  honorare  se  simulat, 
ieiunans  in  eodem  die,  et  in  domi- 
nico ;  quia  Christum  in  vera  hominis 
natura  natum  esse  non  credit,  sicut 
Cerdon,  Marcion,  Manichaeus,  et 
Priscillianus,  anathema  sit.'  A 
similar  prohibition  is  given  by 
Gregory  II  (t725),  Capitulare,  c. 
10  (P.  L.  lxxxix.  534).  To  failings 
in  the  opposite  direction  the  Church 
was  more  tender :  cf.  Penitentiale 
Theodori  (Haddan  and  Stubbs,  iii. 
177),  de  Crapida  et  Ebrietate  'Si 
vero  pro  infirmitate  aut  quia  longo 
tempore  se  abstinuerit,  et  in  con- 
suetudine  non  erit  ei  multum  bibere 
vel  manducare,  aut  pro  gaudio  in 
Natale  Domini  aut  in  Pascha  aut 
proalicuius  Sanctorum  commemora- 
tione  faciebat,  et  tunc  plus  non  ac- 
cipit  quam  decretum  est  a  seniori- 
bus,  nihil  nocet.  Si  episcopus 
iuberit,  non  nocet  illi,  nisi  ipse 
similiter  faciat.' 


R  % 


244  FOLK  DRAMA 

thousand,  and  of  which  the  visit  of  the  Magi  gradually 
became  the  leading  feature.  The  Dodecahemerony  or  period 
of  twelve  days,  linking  together  Christmas  and  Epiphany, 
was  already  known  to  Ephraim  Syrus  as  a  festal  tide  at  the 
end  of  the  fourth  century 1,  and  was  declared  to  be  such  by 
the  council  of  Tours  in  567  2. 

To  these  islands  Christmas  came,  if  not  with  the  Keltic 
Church,  at  least  with  St.  Augustine  in  592.  On  Christmas 
day,  598,  more  than  ten  thousand  English  converts  were 
baptized  3,  and  by  the  time  of  Bede  (f  734)  Christmas  was 
established,  with  Epiphany  and  Easter,  as  one  of  the  three 
leading  festivals  of  the  year 4.  The  Laws  of  Ethelred  (991- 
10 1 6)  and  of  Edward  the  Confessor  ordain  it  a  holy  tide  of 
peace  and  concord  5.  Continental  Germany  received  it  from 
the  synod  of  Mainz  in  813 6,  while  Norway  owed  it  to  King 
Hakon  the  Good  in  the  middle  of  the  tenth  century 7. 

Side  by  side  with  the  establishment  of  Christmas  pro- 
ceeded the  ecclesiastical  denunciation  of  those  pagan  festivals 
whose  place  it  was  to  take.  Little  is  heard  in  Christian 
times  of  the  Saturnalia,  which  do  not  seem  to  have  shared 
the  popularity  of  the  Kalends  outside  the  limits  of  Rome 
itself.  But  these  latter,  and  especially  the  Kalends,  are  the 
subject  of  attack  in  every  corner  of  the  empire.  Jerome  of 
Rome,  Ambrose  of  Milan,  Maximus  of  Turin,  Chrysologus 
of  Ravenna,  assail  them  in  Italy ;  Augustine  in  Africa ; 
Chrysostom  and  Asterius  and  the  Trullan  council  in  the 
East.  In  Spain,  Bishop  Pacian  of  Barcelona  made  a  treatise 
upon  one  of  the  most  objectionable  features  of  the  festival 
which,  as  he  says  with  some  humour,  probably  tended  to 
increase  its  vogue.  In  Gaul,  Caesarius  of  Aries  initiated 
a   vigorous   campaign.     To   cite   all   the   ecclesiastical   pro- 

1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  122.  gum  tidan  ealswahit  riht  is,  eallum 

2  Cf.  Appendix  N,  No.  xxii.  cristenum   mannum    sib   and    som 
8  Efiist.  Gregorii  ad  Eulogium     gemaene,    and    aelc    sacu    getwae- 

(Haddan  and  Stubbs,  iii.  12).  med.'    Cf.  Leges  Edwardi  (Thorpe, 

4  Epist.    Bedae    ad    Egbertum  i.  443). 

(Haddan  and  Stubbs,  iii.  323).  6  C.  Moguntiacum,  c.  36  (Mansi, 

0  Leges      Ethelredi       (Thorpe,  xiv.   73)    '  In   natali    Domini    dies 

Ancient  Laws,  i.  309)  '  Ordal  and  quatuor,     octavas      Domini,     epi- 

adhar  sindon  tocweden  .  .  .  fram  phaniam  Domini.' 

Adventum     Domini    odh    octavas  7  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  203. 
Epiphanie.  .  .  .  And  beo  tham  hal- 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER  245 

nouncements  on  the  subject  would  be  tedious.  Homily 
followed  homily,  canon  followed  canon,  capitulary  followed 
capitulary,  penitential  followed  penitential,  for  half  a  thousand 
years.  But  the  Kalends  died  hard.  When  Boniface  was 
tackling  them  amongst  the  Franks  in  the  middle  of  the 
eighth  century,  he  was  sorely  hampered  by  the  bad  example 
of  their  continued  prevalence  at  the  very  gates  of  the  Vatican; 
and  when  Burchardus  was  making  his  collection  of  heathen 
observances  in  the  eleventh  century,  those  of  the  Kalends 
were  still  to  be  included.  In  England  there  is  not  much  heard 
of  them,  but  a  reference  in  the  so-called  Penitential  of  Egbert 
about  766  proves  that  they  were  not  unknown.  It  need  hardly 
be  said  that  all  formal  religious  celebration  of  the  Kalends 
disappeared  with  the  official  victory  of  Christianity.  But  this 
element  had  never  been  of  great  importance  in  the  feast ;  and 
the  terms  in  which  the  ecclesiastical  references  from  beginning 
to  end  are  couched  prove  that  they  relate  mainly  to  popular 
New  Year  customs  common  to  the  Germanic  and  the  more 
completely  Latinized  populations I. 

It  appears  from  a  decree  of  the  council  of  Tours  in  567  that, 
ad  calcandam  Gentilium  consuetudinem,  the  fourth-century 
Fathers  established  on  the  first  three  days  of  January  a 
triduum  ieiunii,  with  litanies,  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  these 
days  fell  in  the  very  midst  of  the  festal  period  of  the 
Dodecahemeron2.  At  the  same  time  January  1  was  kept 
as  the  octave  of  Christmas,  and  the  early  Roman  ritual- 
books  show  two  masses  for  that  day,  one  in  octavis  Domini, 
the  other  ad  prohibendum  ab  idolis.  The  Jewish  custom  by 
which  circumcision  took  place  eight  days  after  birth  made  it 
almost  inevitable  that  there  should  be  some  celebration  of  the 
circumcision  of  Christ  upon  the  octave  of  his  Nativity.  This 
was  the  case  from  the  sixth  century,  and  ultimately,  about 
the  eighth,  the  attempt  to  keep  up  a  fast  on  January  1  was 
surrendered,  and  the  festival  of  the  Circumcision  took  its 
place  3. 

Some  tendency  was  shown  by  the  Church  not  merely  to 

1  Cf.   the   collection   of  prohibi-      N,  No.  xxii). 

tions  in  Appendix  N.  3  R.   Sinker,   in  D.   C.  A.   s.  v. 

2  C.  of  Tours,  c.   18  (Appendix      Circumcision. 


246  FOLK  DRAMA 

set  up  Christmas  as  a  rival  to  the  pagan  winter  feasts,  but 
also  to  substitute  it  for  the  Kalends  of  January  as  the 
beginning  of  the  year.  But  the  innovation  never  affected 
the  civil  year,  and  was  not  maintained  even  by  ecclesiastical 
writers  with  any  consistency,  for  even  they  prefer  in  many 
cases  a  year  dating  from  the  Annunciation,  or  more  rarely 
from  Easter.  The  so-called  Annunciation  style  found  favour 
even  for  many  civil  purposes  in  Great  Britain,  and  was  not 
finally  abandoned  until  1753 *■  But  although  Christmas 
cannot  be  said  to  have  ever  become  a  popular  New  Year's 
day,  yet  its  festal  importance  and  its  propinquity  to 
January  1  naturally  led  to  a  result  undesired  and  possibly 
undreamt  of  by  its  founders,  namely,  the  further  transference 
to  it  of  many  of  the  long-suffering  Germano-Keltic  folk- 
customs,  which  had  already  travelled  under  Roman  influence 
from  the  middle  of  November  to  the  beginning  of  January2. 
Already  in  the  sixth  century  it  had  become  necessary  to 
forbid  the  abuses  which  had  gathered  around  the  celebration 
of  Christmas  eve  3  ;  and  the  Christmas  customs  of  to-day, 
even  where  their  name  does  not  testify  to  their  original 
connexion   with   the   Kalends 4,  are   in    a   large   number   of 


1  On  this  difficult  subject  see  chalendan,  chalendal,  calignaon, 
Tille,  Y.  and  C.  134;  H.  Grotefend,  or  atlenos,  and  the  peasants  sang 
Taschenbuch  der  Zeitrechnung  round  it  '  Calene  vient '  (Tille,  D. 
(\%<fi),\\;¥.'Rw\<\,Chronologiedes  W.2S6;  Miiller,  475,478).  Thiers, 
Mittelalters  und der Neuzeii  (1897),  i.  264,  speaks  of  '  le  pain  de  Ca- 
23 ;  C.  Plummer,  Anglo-Saxon  lende.'  Christmas  songs  used  to 
Chronicle,  ii.  cxxix  ;  R.  L.  Poole,  be  known  in  Silesia  as  Kolende- 
in  Eng.  Hist.  Review  (1 901),  719.  lieder   (Tille,  D.    W.    287).      The 

2  The  position  of  Christmas  would  Lithuanian  term  for  Christmas  is 
have  made  it  natural  that  it  should  Kalledos  and  the  Czechic  Koleda 
attract  observances  from  the  spring  (Polish  Kolenda,  Russian Koljada). 
festivals  also,  and,  in  fact,  it  did  at-  A  verb  colendisare  appears  as  a 
tract  the  Mummers' play:  cf.  p.  226.  Bohemian  law  term  (Tille,  Y.  and 
It  cannot  of  course  be  positively  C.  84) ;  while  in  the  fourteenth 
said  whether  the  Epiphany  fires  and  century  the  Christmas  quete  at 
some  of  the  other  agricultural  rites  Prague  was  known  as  the  Ko- 
to be  presently  mentioned  (ch.  xii)  ledasammeln  (Tille,  D.  W.  112). 
came  from  the  November  or  the  The  Bohemian  Christmas  proces- 
ploughing  festival.  sion  described  by  Alsso  (cf.  ch.  xii) 

8  C.  of '  Auxerre  (573-603),  c.  II  was   called  Calendizatio,   and   ac- 

(Appendix  N.  No.  xxv).  cording  to   tradition   St    Adalbert 

*  In  the  south  of  France  Christmas  (tenth  century)  transferred  it  from 

is  Chalendes,  in  Provence  Calendas  the     Kalends    to   Christmas,    and 

or  Calenos.      The  log  is  calignau,  called  it  colendizatio  '  a  colendo' 


THE  BEGINNING  OF  WINTER  247 

cases,  so  far  of  course  as  they  are  not  simply  ecclesiastical, 
merely  doublets  of  those  of  the  New  Year. 

What  is  true  of  Christmas  is  true  also  of  Epiphany  or 
Twelfth  night ;  and  the  history  of  the  other  modern  festivals 
of  the  winter  cycle  is  closely  parallel.  The  old  Germanic 
New  Year's  day  on  November  n  became  the  day  of  St. 
Martin,  a  fourth-century  bishop  of  Tours,  and  the  pervigiliae 
of  St.  Martin,  like  those  of  the  Nativity  itself,  already  caused 
a  scandal  in  the  sixth  century1.  The  observances  of  the 
deferred  days  of  slaughter  clustered  round  the  feasts  of 
St.  Andrew  on  November  30,  and  more  especially  St.  Nicholas 
on  December  6.  The  Todtenfest,  which  had  strayed  to  the 
beginning  of  November,  was  continued  in  the  feasts  of  All 
Saints  or  Hallowmas,  the  French  Toussaint,  on  November  1, 
and  its  charitable  supplement  of  All  Souls,  on  November  2. 
That  which  had  strayed  still  further  to  the  time  of  harvest 
became  the  Gemeinwoche  or  week-wake,  and  ultimately  St. 
Michael  and  All  Angels.  Nor  is  this  all.  Very  similar 
customs  attached  themselves  to  the  minor  feasts  of  the 
Dodecahemeron,  St.  Stephen's,  St.  John  the  Evangelist's, 
Innocents'  days,  to  the  numerous  dedication  wakes  that  fell 
on  days,  such  as  St.  Luke's2,  in  autumn  or  early  winter,  or 
to  the  miscellaneous  feasts  closely  approaching  the  Christmas 
season,  St.  Clement's,  St.  Catherine's,  St.  Thomas's,  with  which 
indeed  in  many  localities  that  season  is  popularly  supposed 
to  begin3.  Nor  was  this  process  sensibly  affected  by  the 
establishment  in  the  sixth  century  of  the  ieiunium  known 
as  Advent,  which  stretched  for  a   Quadragesima,  or  period 

1  C.  of  Auxerre  (573-603),  c.  5  and   the   gilt   on  the    gingerbread 

(Appendix    N,    No.   xxv).      Pfan-  took  the  same  shape.     It  will  be 

nenschmidt,   498,   has  collected    a  remembered  that  the  symbol  of  St. 

number   of  notices  of  Martinalia  Luke  in  Christian  art  is  a  horned 

from  the  tenth  century  onwards.  ox. 

a  Pfannenschmidt,     279;    Dyer,  s  Cf.  p.  114.  According  to  Spence, 

386,  describe  the  •  Horn  Fair  '  at  196,  the  Shetland  Christmas  begins 

Charlton,  Kent,  on  St.  Luke's  Day,  on  St.  Thomas's  Day  and  ends  on 

Oct.    18.     A  king  and  queen  were  Jan.    18,    known     as    'Four    and 

chosen,  who  went  in  procession  to  Twenty  Day.'     Candlemas  (Feb.  2) 

the  church,  wearing  horns.     The  is  also  often  regarded  as  the  end 

visitors   wore   masks    or    women's  of    the    Christmas    season.       The 

clothes,  and  played  practical  jokes  Anglo-Saxon  Christmas  feast  lasted 

with  water.    Rams'  horns  were  sold  to  the  Octave  of  Epiphany  (Tille, 

at  the  fair,  which  lasted  three  days,  Y  and  C.  165). 


248  FOLK  DRAMA 

of  forty  days,  from  Martinmas  onwards.  And  finally,  just  as 
in  May  village  dipping  customs  attached  themselves  in  the 
seventeenth  century  to  Royal  Oak  day,  so  in  the  same 
century  we  find  the  winter  festival  fires  turned  to  new 
account  in  the  celebration  of  the  escape  of  King  and  Parlia- 
ment from  the  nefarious  machinations  of  Guy  Fawkes. 


CHAPTER  XII 
NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  two  works  of  Dr.  Tille  remain  of  im- 
portance. The  compilations  specially  devoted  to  the  usages  of  the 
Christmas  season  are  chiefly  of  a  popular  character ;  W.  Sandys, 
Christmas  Tide  (n.d.),  J.  Ashton,  A  Righte  Merrie  Christmasse! 7 /(n.  d.), 
and,  for  French  data,  E.  Miiller,  Le  Jour  de  rAn  (n.  d.),  may  be  men- 
tioned ;  H.  Usener,  Religionsgeschichtliche  Untersuchungen,  vol.  ii  (1889), 
prints  various  documents,  including  the  Largum  Seroota.  Bohemian  priest 
named  Alsso,  on  early  fifteenth-century  Christmas  eve  customs.  Most  of 
the  books  named  in  the  bibliographical  note  to  chap,  v  also  cover  the 
subject.  A  Bibliography  of  Christmas  runs  through  Notes  and  Queries} 
6th  series,  vi.  506,  viii.  491,  x.  492,  xii.  489;  7th  series,  ii.  502,  Hi.  152, 
iv.  502,  vi.  483,  x.  502,  xii.  483 ;  8th  series,  ii.  505,  iv.  502,  vi.  483,  viii. 
483,  x.  512,  xii.  502  ;  9th  series,  ii.  505,  iv.  515,  vi.  485.] 

It  is  the  outcome  of  the  last  chapter  that  all  the  folk- 
customs  of  the  winter  half  of  the  year,  from  Michaelmas  to 
Plough  Monday,  must  be  regarded  as  the  flotsam  and  jetsam 
of  a  single  original  feast.  This  was  a  New  Year's  feast,  held 
by  the  Germano-Keltic  tribes  at  the  beginning  of  the  central 
European  winter  when  the  first  snows  fell  about  the  middle 
of  November,  and  subsequently  dislocated  and  dispersed  by 
the  successive  clash  of  Germano-Keltic  civilization  with  the 
rival  schemes  of  Rome  and  of  Christianity.  A  brief  summary 
of  the  customs  in  question  will  show  clearly  their  common 
character.  For  purposes  of  classification  they  may  be  divided 
into  several  groups.  There  are  such  customs  belonging  to 
the  agricultural  side  of  the  old  winter  feast  as  have  not  been 
transferred  with  the  growing  importance  of  tillage  to  the 
feast  of  harvest.  There  are  the  customs  of  its  domestic  side, 
as  a  feast  of  the  family  hearth  and  of  the  dead  ancestors. 
There  are  the  distinctively  New  Year  customs  of  omen  and 
prognostication  for  the  approaching  twelve  months.  There 
are  the  customs  of  play,  common  more  or  less  to  all  the 
village  festivals.  And,  finally,  there  are  a  small  number  of 
customs,  or  perhaps  it  would  be  truer  to  say  legends,  which 


250  FOLK  DRAMA 

appear  to  owe  their  origin  not  merely  to  heathenism  trans- 
formed by  Christianity,  but  to  Christianity  itself.  Each  of 
these  groups  may  well  claim  a  more  thoroughgoing  con- 
sideration than  can  here  be  given  to  any  one  of  them. 

The  agricultural  customs  are  just  those  of  the  summer 
feasts  over  again.  Once  more  the  fertilization  spirit  is 
abroad  in  the  land.  The  embodiment  of  it  in  vegetation 
takes  several  forms.  Obviously  the  last  foliage  and  bur- 
geoning flowers  of  spring  and  summer  are  no  longer  avail- 
able. But  there  is,  to  begin  with,  the  sheaf  of  corn  or 
'harvest -May'  in  which  the  spirit  appeared  at  harvest,  and"1 
which  is  called  upon  once  more  to  play  its  part  in  the  winter 
rites.  This,  however,  is  not  a  very  marked  part.  A  York- 
shire custom  of  hanging  a  sheaf  on  the  church  door  at 
Christmas  is  of  dubious  origin  1.  But  Swedish  and  Danish 
peasants  use  the  grain  of  the  '  last  sheaf  to  bake  the 
Christmas  cake,  and  both  in  Scandinavia  and  Germany  the 
'  Yule  straw '  serves  various  superstitious  purposes.  It  is 
scattered  on  barren  fields  to  make  them  productive.  It  is 
strewed,  instead  of  rushes,  upon  the  house  floor  and  the 
church  floor.  It  is  laid  in  the  mangers  of  the  cattle.  Fruit- 
trees  are  tied  together  with  straw  ropes,  that  they  may  bear 
well  and  are  said  to  be  '  married  V 

More  naturally  the  fertilization  spirit'  may  be  discerned  at 
the  approach  of  winter  in  such  exceptional  forms  of  vegeta- 
tion as  endure  the  season.  In  November  the  apples  and  the 
nuts  still  hang  upon  their  boughs,  and  these  are  traditional 
features  in  the  winter  celebrations.  Then  there  are  the 
evergreens.  Libanius,  Tertullian,  and  Chrysostom  tell  how 
on  the  Kalends  the  doors  of  houses  throughout  the  Roman 
empire  were  crowned  with  bay.  Martin  of  Braga  forbade 
the  '  pagan  observance '  in  a  degree  which  found  its  way  into 
the  canon  law.  The  original  strena  which  men  gave  one 
another  on  the  same  day  for  luck  was  nothing  but  a  twig 
plucked  from  a  sacred  grove  ;  and  still  in  the  fifth  century  men 

1  Dyer,  451 ;  Ashton,  118,  where  birds.' 

the   custom   is   said  to  have  been  a  Frazer,    i.    177,   ii.   I72>    286  ; 

'started  by  the  Rev.  J.  Kenworthy,  Grimm,  iv.  1783;  Tille,  D.  W.  50, 

Rector  of  Ackworth,  in  Yorkshire,  178  ;  Alsso,  in  Usener,  ii.  61,  65. 
...  for  the  special   benefit  of  the 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  251 

returned  from  their  new  year  auguries  laden  with  ramusculi 
that  they  might  thereafter  be  laden  with  wealth l.  It  is  not 
necessary  to  dwell  upon  the  surviving  use  of  evergreens  in 
the  decoration  at  Christmas  of  houses  and  churches2.  The 
sacredness  of  these  is  reflected  in  the  taboo  which  enjoins 
that  they  shall  not  be  cast  out  upon  the  dust-heap,  but  shall, 
when  some  appropriate  day,  such  as  Candlemas,  arrives,  be 
solemnly  committed  to  the  flames 3.  Obviously  amongst 
other  evergreens  the  holly  and  the  ivy,  with  their  clustering 
pseudo-blossoms  of  coral  and  of  jet,  are  the  more  adequate 
representatives  of  the  fertilization  spirit4;  most  of  all  the 
mistletoe,  perched  an  alien  visitant,  faintly  green  and  white, 
amongst  the  bared  branches  of  apple  or  of  oak.  The  mistle- 
toe has  its  especial  place  in  Scandinavian  myth 5 :  Pliny 
records  the  ritual  use  of  it  by  the  Druids 6 ;  it  is  essential  to 
the  winter  revels  in  their  amorous  aspect ;  and  its  vanished 
dignities  still  serve,  here  to  bar  it  from,  there  to  make  it  impera- 
tive in,  the  edifices  of  Christian  worship 7.  A  more  artificial 
embodiment  of  the  fertilization  spirit  is  the  '  Christmas  tree' 

1  Lipenius,  423  ;  cf.  Appendix  N,  one  of  them  drop  her  materials  on 
Nos.  i,  vi,  xiii,  xxiv.  the  ground,  she  was  torn  to  pieces 

2  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  103,  174;  Phil-  by  her  companions  (Rhys,  C.  H. 
pot,  164;  Jackson  and  Burne,  397;  196).  They  are  replaced  on  Candle- 
Dyer,  457  ;  Stow,  Survey  of  London  mas  by  snowdrops,  or,  according  to 
(ed.  1618),  149 'Against  the  feast  Herrick,  'the  greener  box.'  In 
of  Christmas,  euery  mans  house,  Shropshire  a  garland  made  of 
as  also  their  parish  Churches,  were  blackthorn  is  left  hanging  from 
decked  with  Holm,  Iuy,  Bayes,  and  New  Year  to  New  Year,  and  then 
whatsoever  the  season  of  the  yeere  burnt  in  a  festival  fire  (F.  L.  x.  489  ; 
aforded  to  be  greene.      The  Con-  xii.  349). 

duits  and  Standards  in  the  streetes  4  The  Christmas, rivalry  between 

were,    likewise,    garnished.'        He  holly   and    ivy    is    the    subject    of 

gives  an  example  from  1444.  carols,    some   dating  from  the   fif- 

3  Burne-Jackson,  245,  397,  411;  teenth  century;  cf.  Ashton,  92; 
Ashton,  95.     Customs  vary:   here  Burne-Jackson,  245. 

the  evergreens  must  be  burnt ;  there  5  Grimm,  iii.  1205. 

given  to  the  cattle.     They  should  6  Pliny,  Nat.  Hist.  xxi.  95. 

not  touch  the  ground  (Grimm,  iii.  "'  Ashton,  81,  92;  Ditchfield,  18; 

1207).     With  this   taboo   compare  Brand,  i.  285  ;  Dyer,  458;  Philpot, 

that  described  by  ancient  writers,  164.     Mistletoe  is  the  chief  ingre- 

probably  on  the  authority  of  Posi-  dient  of  the  '  kissing-bunch,'  some- 

donius,  as   existing    in    a    cult    of  times  a  very  elaborate  affair,  with 

a    god    identified    with    Dionysus  apples  and  dolls  hung  in  it.     The 

amongst  the  Namnites  on  the  west  ecclesiastical  taboo  is  not  universal ; 

coast   of  Gaul.     A   temple   on    an  in  York  Minster,  e.g.,  mistletoe  was 

island  was  unroofed  and  reroofed  laid  on  the  altar. 
by  the  priestesses  annually.     Did 


252  FOLK  DRAMA 

par  excellence,  adorned  with  lights  and  apples,  and  often  with 
a  doll  or  image  upon  the  topmost  sprig.  The  first  recorded 
Christmas  tree  is  at  Strassburg  in  1604.  The  custom  is 
familiar  enough  in  modern  England,  but  there  can  be  little 
doubt  that  here  it  is  of  recent  introduction,  and  came  in,  in 
fact,  with  the  Hanoverians  x. 

Finally,  there  can  be  little  wonder  that  the  popular 
imagination  found  a  special  manifestation  of  the  fertiliza- 
tion spirit  in  the  unusual  blossoming  of  particular  trees  or 
species  of  trees  in  the  depths  of  winter.  In  mild  seasons 
a  crab  or  cherry  might  well  adorn  the  old  winter  feast 
in  November.  A  favourable  climate  permits  such  a  thing 
even  at  mid-winter.  Legend,  at  any  rate,  has  no  doubt  of 
the  matter,  and  connects  the  event  definitely  with  Christmas. 
A  tenth-century  Arabian  geographer  relates  how  all  the  trees 
of  the  forest  stand  in  full  bloom  on  the  holy  night.  In  the 
thirteenth-century  Vita  of  St.  Hadwigis  the  story  is  told  of 
a  cherry-tree.  A  fifteenth-century  bishop  of  Bamberg  tells 
it  of  two  apple-trees,  and  to  apple-trees  the  miracle  belongs, 
in  German  folk-belief,  to  this  day 2.  In  England  the  stories 
of  Christmas-flowering  hawthorns  or  blackthorns  are  specific 
and  probably  not  altogether  baseless 3.     The  belief  found  a 

1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  174 ;  D.  IV.  Oake  in  the  New  Forest.  In  Par- 
256,  and  in  F.  L.  iii.  166;  Philpot,  ham  Park,  in  Suffolk  (Mr.  Bou- 
164;  Ashton,  189;  Kempe,  Loseley  tele's),  is  a  pretty  ancient  thorne, 
MSS.  75.  The  earliest  English  that  blossomes  like  that  at  Glaston- 
mention  is  in  1789.  bury;  the  people  flock  hitherto  see 

2  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  170.  it  on  Christmas  day.      But  in  the 

3  Ibid.  172  ;  Ashton,  105,  quoting  rode  that  leades  from  Worcester  to 
Aubrey,  Natural  Hist,  of  Wilts,  Droitwiche  is  a  black  thorne  hedge 
'  Mr.  Anthony  Hinton,  one  of  the  at  Clayes,  half  a  mile  long  or  more, 
officers  of  the  Earle  of  Pembroke,  that  blossoms  about  Christmas-day 
did  inoculate,  not  long  before  the  for  a  week  or  more  together.  Dr. 
late  civill  warres  (ten  yeares  or  Ezerel  Tong  sayd  that  about 
more),  a  bud  of  Glastonbury  Thorne,  Rumly-Marsh  in  Kent,  are  thornes 
on  a  thorne,  at  his  farm  house,  at  naturally  like  that  near  Glaston- 
Wilton,  which  blossoms  at  Christ-  bury.  The  Soldiers  did  cutt  downe 
mas,  as  the  other  did.  My  mother  that  near  Glastonbury  :  the  stump 
has  had  branches  of  them  for  a  remaines.'  Specimens  are  stillfound 
flower-pott,  several  Christmasses,  about  Glastonbury  of  Crataegus 
which  I  have  seen.  Elias  Ashmole,  oxyacantha  praecox,  a  winter- 
Esq.,  in  his  notes  upon  Theatrum  flowering  variety  of  hawthorn:  some 
Chymicum,  saies  that  in  the  church-  of  the  alleged  slips  from  the  Glas- 
yard  at  Glastonbury  grew  a  walnutt  tonbury  thorn  appear,  however,  to 
tree,  that  did  putt  out  young  leaves  be  Prunus  communis,  or  black- 
at  Christmas,  as  doth  the  King's  thorn.   A  writer  in  the  Gentleman's 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  253 

special  location  at  Glastonbury,  where  the  famous  thorn  is 
said  by  William  of  Malmesbury  and  other  writers  to  have 
budded  from  the  staff  of  Joseph  of  Arimathea,  who  there 
ended  his  wanderings  with  the  Holy  Grail.  Where  winter- 
flowering  trees  are  not  found,  a  custom  sometimes  exists  of 
putting  a  branch  of  cherry  or  of  hawthorn  in  water  some 
weeks  before  Christmas  in  order  that  it  may  blossom  and 
serve  as  a  substitute  K 

It  may  fairly  be  conjectured  that  at  the  winter,  as  at  the 
summer  feast,  the  fertilization  spirit,  in  the  form  of  bush  or 
idol,  was  borne  about  the  fields.  The  fifteenth-century  writer, 
Alsso,  records  the  calendisationes  of  the  god  Bel  in  Bohemia, 
suppressed  by  St.  Adalbert 2.  In  modern  England,  a  '  holly- 
bough'  or  '  wesley-bob,'  with  or  without  an  image  or  doll, 
occasionally  goes  its  rounds  3.  But  a  definite  lustration  of  the 
bounds  is  rare  4,  and,  for  the  most  part,  the  winter  procession 
either  is  merely  riotous  or  else,  like  too  many  of  the  summer 
processions  themselves,  has  been  converted,  under  the  succes- 
sive influence  of  the  strenae  and  the  cash  nexus,  into  little 
more  than  a  quite.  Thus  children  and  the  poor  go  '  souling ' 
for  apples  and  '  soul-cakes '  on  All  Souls'  day ;  on  November 
5  they  collect  for  the  'guy';  on  November  n  in  Germany, 
if  not  in  England,  for  St.  Martin  ;  on  St.  Clement's  day 
(November  23)  they  go  '  clemencing ' ;  on  St.  Catherine's 
(November  25)  '  catherning.'  Wheat  is  the  coveted  boon  on 
St.  Thomas's  day  (December  21)  or  '  doling  day,'  and  the 
quite  is  variously  known  as  '  thomasing,'  '  mumping/  '  corn- 
ing,' '  gooding,'  '  hodening,'  or  '  hooding  V     Christmas  brings 

Magazine  for  1753  reports  that  the  for  the  idol,  and  the  cry  of '  Vele, 
opponents  of  the  '  New  Style  '  in-  Vele,'  for  that  of '  Bely,  Bely.' 
troduced  in  1752  were  encouraged  s  Ashton,  244;  Dyer,  483  ;  Ditch- 
by  the    refusal    of  the  thorns    at  field,    15.      The    dolls    sometimes 
Glastonbury  and  Quainton  in  Buck-  represent   the   Virgin    and    Child, 
inghamshire  to  flower  before  Old  '  Wesley-bob '  and  the  alternative 
Christmas  day.   A  Somerset  woman  '  vessel-cup '  appear  to  be  corrup- 
told  a  writer  in  3  N.  Q.  ix.  33  that  tions  of  'wassail.' 
the  buds  of  the  thorns  burst  into  *  Cf.,    however,    the    Burghead 
flower  at   midnight   on   Christmas  ceremony  (p.  256). 
Eve,  'As  they  corned  out,  you  could  6  Brand,  i.  217  ;  Burne- Jackson, 
hear  'um  haffer.'  381 ;    Dyer,    405  ;    Ditchfield,   25, 
1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  175.  161;    Northall,   216;    Henderson, 
*  Usener,  ii.  61.    Alsso  says  that  66;  Haddon,  476  ;  Pfannenschmidt, 
St.  Adalbert  substituted  a  crucifix  206.     The  N.  E.  D.  plausibly  ex- 


254 


FOLK  DRAMA 


'wassailing'  with  its  bowl  of  lamb's-wool  and  its  bobbing 
apple,  and  this  is  repeated  on  New  Year's  day  or  eve 1. 
The  New  Year  quite  is  probably  the  most  widespread  and 
popular  of  all.  Ducange  records  it  at  Rome 2.  In  France  it 
is  known  as  V  Aguilaneufz,  in  Scotland  and  the  north  of 
England  as  Hogmanay,  terms  in  which  the  philologists  meet 
problems  still  unsolved 4.     Other  forms  of  the  winter  quite 


plains  '  gooding,'  which  seems  to  be 
used  of  any  of  these  quetes  as  'wish- 
ing good,'  and  '  hooding '  may  be  a 
corruption  of  this. 

1  Brand,  i.  I  ;  Dyer,  501  ;  Ditch- 
field,  42 ;  Northall,  183.  Skeat 
derives  wassail,  M.E.  wasseyl,  '  a 
health-drinking,'  from  N.E.  was 
heel,  A.-S.  wes  hdl,  '  be  whole.' 

2  Ducange,  Gloss,  s.v.  Kalendae 
Ianuarii,  quoting  Cerem.  Rom.  ad 
calcem  Cod.  MS.  eccl.  Camerac. 
'  Hii  sunt  ludi  Romani  communes 
in  Kalendis  Ianuarii.  In  vigilia 
Kalendarum  in  sero  surgunt  pueri, 
et  portant  scutum.  Quidam  eorum 
est  larvatus  cum  maza  in  collo ; 
sibilando  sonant  timpanum,  eunt 
per  domos,  circumdant  scutum,  tim- 
panum sonat,  larva  sibilat.  Quo 
ludo  finito,  accipiunt  munus  a  do- 
mino domus,  secundum  quod  placet 
ei.  Sic  faciunt  per  unamquamque 
domum.  Eo  die  de  omnibus  legu- 
minibus  comedunt.  Mane  autem 
surgunt  duo  pueri  ex  illis,  accipiunt 
ramos  olivae  -et  sal,  et  intrant  per 
domos,  salutant  domum  :  Gaudium 
et  laetitia  sit  in  hac  domo ;  tot 
filii,  tot  porcelli,  tot  agni,  et  de 
omnibus  bonis  optant,  et  antequam 
sol  oriatur,  comedunt  vel  favum 
mellis,  vel  aliquid  duke,  ut  totus 
annus  procedat  eis  dulcis,  sine  lite 
et  labore  magno.' 

3  Du  Tilliot,  67,  quoting  J.  B. 
Thiers,  Traill  des  jeux  et  des  diver- 
tissemens,  452  ;  Midler,  103.  There 
are  some  Guillaneu  songs  in  Bu- 
jeaud,  ii.  153.  The  quete  was  pro- 
hibited by  two  synods  of  Angers 
in  1595  and  1668. 

4  Brand,  i.  247 ;  Dyer,  505 ; 
Ditchfield,  44;  Ashton,2i7;  North- 
all,  181  ,;  Henderson,  76  ;  Tille, 
Y.  and  C.  204;    Nicholson,  Gol- 


spie, 100;  Rhys,  in  F.  L.  ii.  308. 
Properly. speaking,  '  Hogmanay'  is 
the  gift  of  an  oaten  farl  asked  for 
in  the  quete.  It  is  also  applied  to 
the  day  on  which  the  quete  takes 
place,  which  is  in  Scotland  generally 
New  Year's  Eve.  Besides  the  quete, 
Hogmanay  night,  like  Halloween 
elsewhere,  is  the  night  for  horse-play 
and  practical  joking.  The  name 
appears  in  many  forms, '  Hogmana,' 
'  Hogomanay,' '  Nog-money'  (Scot- 
land), '  Hogmina '  (Cumberland), 
1  Hagmena '  (Northumberland), 
'  Hagman  heigh  !'  '  Hagman  ha! ' 
(Yorkshire),  'Agganow'  (Lanca- 
shire), '  Hob  dy  naa,'  '  Hob  ju  naa' 
(Isle  of  Man).  It  is  generally  ac- 
cepted as  equivalent  to  the  French 
aguilanneuf,  aguilanleu,  guillaneu, 
hagui  men  lo,  hoquinano,  &c,  ad 
infin.,  the  earliest  form  being  augui- 
lanleu  (1353).  With  the  Scotch 
'  Hogmanay, 
Trollolay, 

Give  us  of  your  white  bread  and 
none  of  your  grey ' ! 
may  be  compared  the  French, 
'  Tire  lire, 

Maint  de  blanc,  et  point  du  bis.' 
On  no  word  has  amateur  philology 
been  more  riotous.  It  has  been 
derived  from  '  au  gui  menez,'  '  a 
gui  1'an  neuf,'  'au  gueux  menez,' 
'Halig  monath,'  ayla  ni]VT),  '  Homme 
est  ne,'  and  the  like.  Tille  thinks 
that  the  whole  of  December  was 
formerly  Hogmanay,  and  derives 
from  mondth  and  either  *  hoggva, 
'  hew,'  hag,  '  witch,'  or  hog,  '  pig.' 
Nicholson  tries  the  other  end,  and 
traces  auguilanleu  to  the  Spanish 
aguinaldo  or  aguilando,  '  a  New 
Year's  gift.'  This  in  turn  he  makes 
the  gerund  of  *aguilar,  an  assumed 
corruption  of  alquilar,  'to  hire  one- 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS 


255 


will  crop  up  presently,  and  the  visits  of  the  guisers  with  their 
play  or  song,  the  carol  singers  and  the  waits  may  be  expected 
at  any  time  during  the  Christmas  season.  As  at  the  summer 
quetes,  some  reminiscence  of  the  primitive  character  of  the 
processions  is  to  be  found  in  the  songs  sung,  with  their  wish 
of  prosperity  to  the  liberal  household  and  their  ill-will  to  the 
churl  K 

In  the  summer  festivals  both  water-rites  and  fire-rites 
frequently  occur.  In  those  of  winter,  water-rites  are  com- 
paratively rare,  as  might  naturally  be  expected  at  a  season 
when  snow  and  ice  prevail.  There  is  some  trace,  however, 
of  a  custom  of  drawing  '  new '  water,  as  of  making  '  new  '  fire, 
for  the  new  year2.  Festival  fires,  on  the  other  hand,  are 
widely  distributed,  and  agree  in  general  features  -with  those 
of  summer.  Their  relation  to  the  fertility  of  crop  and  herd 
is  often  plainly  enough  marked.  They  are  perhaps  most 
familiar  to-day  in  the  comparatively  modern  form  of  the  Guy 
Fawkes  celebration   on  November  53,  but  they  are   known 


self  out.'  Hogmanay  will  thus  mean 
properly  '  handsel '  or  '  hiring- 
money,'  and  the  first  Monday  in 
the  New  Year  is  actually  called  in 
Scotland  '  Handsel  Monday.'  This 
is  plausible,  but,  although  no  philo- 
logist, I  think  a  case  might  be  made 
out  for  regarding  the  terms  as 
corruptions  of  the  Celtic  Nos 
Calan-gaeaf, '  the  night  of  the  winter 
Calends  '  (Rhys,  514).  This  is  All 
Saints'  eve,  while  the  Manx  '  Hob 
dy  naa'  quete  is  on  Hollantide 
(November  12  ;  cf.  p.  230). 

1  A  Gloucestershire  wassail  song 

in  Dixon,  Ancient  Poems,  199,  ends, 

'  Come,  butler,  come  bring  us  a 

bowl  of  the  best : 

I  hope  your  soul  in  heaven  will 

rest ; 
But  if  you  do  bring  us  a  bowl 

of  the  small, 

Then    down    fall    butler,    bowl 

and  all.' 

a  In  Herefordshire  and  the  south 

of  Scotland  it  is  lucky  to  draw  '  the 

cream  of  the  well '  or  '  the  flower 

of  the  .well,'  i.e.  the   first   pail   of 

water  after  midnight  on  New  Year's 

eve  (Dyer,  7,    17).      In    Germany 


Heilwag  similarly  drawn  at  Christ- 
mas is  medicinal  (Grimm,  iv.  1810). 
Pembroke  folk  sprinkle  each  other 
on  New  Year's  Day  (F.  L.  iii. 
263).  St.  Martin  of  Braga  con- 
demns amongst  Kalends  customs 
'  panem  in  fontem  mittere  (Appen- 
dix N,  No.  xxiii),  and  this  form  of 
well-cult  survives  at  Christmas  in 
the  Tyrol  (Jahn,  283)  and  in  France 
(Miiller,  500).  Tertullian  chaffs 
the  custom  of  early  bathing  at 
the  Saturnalia  (Appendix  N,  No. 
ii).  Gervase  of  Tilbury  (ed.  Lie- 
brecht,  ii.  12)  mentions  an  Eng- 
lish belief  (ti2oo)  in  a  wonder- 
working Christmas  dew.  This 
Tille  (Y.  and  C.  168)  thinks  an 
outgrowth  from  the  Advent  chant 
ftorate  coeli,  but  it  seems  closely 
parallel  to  the  folk  belief  in  May- 
dew. 

3  Burne-Jackson,  388  ;  Simpson, 
202  ;  F.  L.  v.  38  ;  Dyer,  410.  The 
festival  in  its  present  form  can  only 
date  from  the  reign  of  James  I,  but 
the  Pope  used  to  be  burned  in  bon- 
fires as  early  as  1570  upon  the 
accession  day  of  Elizabeth,  Nov.  17 
(Dyer,  422). 


256  FOLK  DRAMA 

also  on  St  Crispin's  day  (October  25)  \  Hallow  e'en2,  St. 
Martin's  day3,  St.  Thomas's  day4,  Christmas  eve5,  New 
Year 6,  and  Twelfth  night 7.  An  elaborate  and  typical  ex- 
ample is  the  '  burning  of  the  clavie '  at  the  little  fishing 
village  of  Burghead  on  the  Moray  Firth 8.  This  takes  place 
on  New  Year's  eve,  or,  according  to  another  account 9,  Christ- 
mas eve  (O.S.).  Strangers  to  the  village  are  excluded  from 
any  share  in  the  ritual.  The  '  clavie '  is  a  blazing  tar-barrel 
hoisted  on  a  pole.  In  making  it,  a  stone  must  be  used  instead 
of  a  hammer,  and  must  then  be  thrown  away.  Similarly,  the 
barrel  must  be  lit  with  a  blazing  peat,  and  not  with  lucifer 
matches.  The  bearers  are  honoured,  and  the  bridegroom  of 
the  year  gets  the  '  first  lift.'  Should  3  bearer  stumble,  it 
portends  death  to  himself  during  the  year  and  ill-luck  to 
the  town.  The  procession  passes  round  the  boundaries  of 
Burghead,  and  formerly  visited  every  boat  in  the  harbour. 
Then  it  is  carried  to  the  top  of  a  hillock  called  the  '  Doorie,' 
down  the  sides  of  which  it  is  finally  rolled.  Blazing  brands 
are  used  to  kindle  the  house  fires,  and  the  embers  are  pre- 
served as  charms. 

The  central  heathen  rite  of  sacrifice  has  also  left  its 
abundant  traces  upon  winter  custom.  Bede  records  the 
significant  name  of  blot-monath,  given  to  November  by  the 
still  unconverted  Anglo-Saxons10.  The  tradition  of  solemn 
slaughter  hangs  around  both  Martinmas  and  Christmas. 
'Martlemas  beef  in  England,  St.  Martin's  swine;  hens,  and 
geese  in  Germany,  mark  the   former  day11.     At  Christmas 

1  Dyer,  389  (Sussex).  small  fires  and  one  large  one  are 
8  Brand,    i.    210,   215    (Buchan,  made  out  in  the  wheat-fields. 
Perthshire,  Aberdeenshire,   North  8  Dyer,  507;  Ashton,  218;  Simp- 
Wales),  son,  205  ;  Gomme,  Brit.  Ass.  Rept. 

•  Pfannenschmidt,  207;  Jahn,  (1896),  631  ;  F.L.  /.vii.  12  ;  Trans. 
240.  Soc.  Antiq.  Scot.  x.  649. 

*  Ashton,  47  (Isle  of  Man,  where  9  Simpson,  205,  quoting  Gordon 
the  day  is  called  '  Fingan's  Eve  ').        Cumming,   From  the  Hebrides  to 

8  Jahn,  253.  the  Himalayas,  i.  245. 

6  F.  L.  xii.  349;  W.  Gregor,  10  Bede,  D.  T.  R.  c.  17:  cf.  the 
Brit.  Ass.  Rept.  (1896),  620  (Min-  A.-S.  passage  quoted  by  Pfannen- 
nigaff,  Galloway;  bones  being  saved  schmidt,  495;  Jahn,  252.  Other 
up  for  this  fire) ;  Gomme,  Brit.  Germanic  names  for  the  winter 
Ass.  Rept.  (1896),  633  (Biggar,  months  are  '  Schlachtmonat,"  Gor- 
Lanarkshire).  manaSa ' :  cf.  Weinhold,  Die  deut- 

7  Brand,  i.  14;  Dyer,  22  (Glou-      schen  Monatsnamen,  54. 
cestershire,  Herefordshire).  Twelve         u  Jahn,   229 ;   Tille,   Y.  and  C. 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  257 

the  outstanding  victim  seems  to  be  the  boar.  Caput  apri 
defero :  reddens  laudem  Domino,  sings  the  taberdar  at  Queen's 
College,  Oxford,  as  the  manciple  bears  in  the  boar's  head  to 
the  Christmas  banquet.  So  it  was  sung  in  many  another 
mediaeval  and  Elizabethan  hall  *,  while  the  gentlemen  of  the 
Inner  Temple  broke  their  Christmas  fast  on  '  brawn,  mustard, 
and  malmsey 2,'  and  in  the  far-off  Orkneys  each  householder 
of  Sandwick  must  slay  his  sow  on  St.  Ignace's  or  '  Sow '  day, 
December  1 7  3.  The  older  mythologists,  with  the  fear  of 
solstices  before  their  eyes,  are  accustomed  to  connect  the 
Christmas  boar  with  the  light-god,  Freyr4.  If  the  cult  of 
any  one  divinity  is  alone  concerned,  the  analogous  use  of  the 
pig  in  the  Eleusinian  mysteries  of  Demeter  would  make 
the  earth-goddess  a  more  probable  guess5.  A  few  more 
recondite  customs  associated  with  particular  winter  anniver- 
saries may  be  briefly  named.  St.  Thomas's  day  is  at  Woking- 
ham the  day  for  bull-baiting6.  On  St.  Stephen's  day,  both 
in  England  and  Germany,  horses  are  let  blood 7.  On  or  about 
Christmas,  boys  are  accustomed  to  set  on  foot  a  hunt  of 
victims  not  ordinarily  destined  to  such  a  fate 8 ;  owls  and 
squirrels,  and  especially  wrens,  the  last,  be  it  noted, 
creatures  which  at  other  times  of  the  year  a  taboo  protects. 
The  wren-hunt  is  found  on  various  dates  in  France,  England, 
Ireland,  and  the  Isle  of  Man,  and  is  carried  out  with  various 
curious  rituals.  Often  the  body  is  borne  in  a  quite,  and  in  the 
Isle  of  Man  the  quiteurs  give  a  feather  as  an  amulet  in  return 
for  hospitality.  There  are  other  examples  of  winter  quites, 
in  which  the  representation  of  a  sacrificial  victim  is  carried 
round9.     'Hoodening'  in  Kent  and  other  parts  of  England 

28,  65;  Pfannenschmidt,  206,  217,  tant :  id  pro  armis  omnique  tutela 

228.  securum  deae  cultorem  etiam  inter 

1  Dyer,  456,  470,  474,  477  ;  Ash-  hostis  praestat.' 
ton,  171  ;  Karl  Blind,   The  Boar's  6  Dyer,  439. 

Head  Dinner  at  Oxford  and  an  7  Dyer,  492 ;  Ashton,  204 ;  Grimm, 

Otd  Teutonic  Sun- God,   in    Saga  iv.  18 16. 

Book  of  Viking  Club  for  1895.  8  Dyer,  481  ;  N.  W.  Thomas,  in 

2  Dyer,  473.  F.  L.  xi.  250.  Cf.  ch.  xvii  for  the 
'  Hampson,  i.  82.  hunt  of  a  cat  and  a  fox  at  the 
*  Gummere,  G.  0.  433.  'grand  Christmas'  of  the  Inner 
5  Tacitus,  Germ.  45,  of  the  Aestii,  Temple. 

'  matrem  deum  venerantur.  insigne  9  Dyer,  494,  497  ;  Frazer,  ii.  442  ; 

superstitionis  formas  aprorum  ges-      Northall,  229. 

CHAMBERS.     I  S 


258  FOLK  DRAMA 

is  accompanied  by  a  horse's  head  or  hobby-horse1.  The 
Welsh  '  Mari  Lwyd'  is  a  similar  feature2,  while  at  Kingscote, 
in  Gloucestershire,  the  wassailers  drink  to  a  bull's  head  called 
<  the  Broad  V 

The  hobby-horse  is  an  example  of  an  apparently  grotesque 
element  which  is  found  widespread  in  folk-processions,  and 
which  a  previous  chapter  has  traced  to  its  ritual  origin.  The 
man  clad  in  a  beast-skin  is  the  worshipper  putting  himself  by 
personal  contact  under  the  influence  and  protection  of  the 
sacrificed  god.  The  rite  is  not  a  very  salient  one  in  modern 
winter  processions,  although  it  has  its  examples,  but  its 
historical  importance  is  great.  A  glance  at  the  ecclesiastical 
denunciations  of  the  Kalends  collected  in  an  appendix  will 
disclose  numerous  references  to  it.  These  are  co-extensive 
with  the  western  area  of  the  Kalends  celebrations.  In  Italy, 
in  Gaul,  in  southern  Germany,  apparently  also  in  Spain  and 
in  England,  men  decked  themselves  for  riot  in  the  heads  and 
skins  of  cattle  and  the  beasts  of  the  chase,  blackened  their 
faces  or  bedaubed  them  with  filth,  or  wore  masks  fit  to  terrify 
the  demons  themselves.  The  accounts  of  these  proceedings 
are  naturally  allusive  rather  than  descriptive ;  the  fullest  are 
given  by  a  certain  Severian,  whose  locality  and  date  are 
unknown,  but  who  may  be  conjectured  to  speak  for  Italy, 
by  Maximus  of  Turin  and  Chrysologus  of  Ravenna  in  the 
fifth  century,  and  by  Caesarius  of  Aries  in  the  beginning 
of  the  sixth.  Amongst  the  portenta  denounced  is  a  certain 
cervulus,  which  lingers  in  the  Penitentials  right  up  to  the 
tenth  century,  and  with  which  are  sometimes  associated 
a  vitula  or  iuvenca.  Caesarius  adds  a  hinnicala,  and 
St.  Eadhelm,  who  is  my  only  authority  for  the  presence 
of  the  cervulus  in  England,  an  ermulus.  These  seem  to  be 
precisely  of  the  nature  of  '  hobby-horses.'  Men  are  said 
cervulunt  ambulare,  cervulum  facere,  in  cervulo  vadere,  and 
Christians  are  forbidden  to  allow  these  portenta  to  come 
before  their  houses.  The  Penitential  of  the  Pseudo-Theodore 
tells  us  that  the  performers  were  those  who  wore  the  skins 

1  Ashton,  114  (Reculver) ;  Dyer,  472  (Ramsgate) ;  Ditchfield,  27 
(Walmer),  28  (Cheshire :  All  Souls'  day). 

2  Dyer,  486.  8  Ditchfield,  28. 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  259 

and  heads  of  beasts.  Maximus  of  Turin,  and  several  writers 
after  him,  put  the  objection  to  the  beast-mimicry  of  the 
Kalends  largely  on  the  ground  that  man  made  in  the  image 
of  God  must  not  transform  himself  into  the  image  of  a  beast. 
But  it  is  clear  that  the  real  reason  for  condemning  it  was  its 
unforgettable  connexion  with  heathen  cult.  Caesarius  warns 
the  culprit  that  he  is  making  himself  into  a  sacrificium 
daemonum,  and  the  disguised  reveller  is  more  than  once 
spoken  of  as  a  living  image  of  the  heathen  god  or  demon 
itself.  There  is  some  confusion  of  thought  here,  and  it  must 
be  remembered  that  the  initial  significance  of  the  skin-wearing 
rite  was  probably  buried  in  oblivion,  both  for  those  who 
practised  it  and  for  those  who  reprobated.  But  it  is  obvious 
that  the  worshipper  wearing  a  sacrificial  skin  would  bear 
a  close  resemblance  to  the  theriomorphic  or  semi-therio- 
morphic  image  developed  out  of  the  sacrificial  skin  nailed 
on  a  tree-trunk ;  and  it  is  impossible  not  to  connect  the 
fact  that  in  the  prohibitions  a  cervulus  or  '  hobby-buck ' 
rather  than  a  '  hobby-horse  '  is  prominent  with  the  widespread 
worship  throughout  the  districts  whence  many  of  these  notices 
come  of  the  mysterious  stag-horned  deity,  the  Cernunnos  of 
the  Gaulish  altars1.  On  the  whole  I  incline  to  think  that 
at  least  amongst  the  Germano-Keltic  peoples  the  agricultural 
gods  were  not  mimed  in  procession  by  human  representatives. 
It  is  true  that  in  the  mediaeval  German  processions  which 
sprang  out  of  those  of  the  Kalends  St.  Nicholas  plays  a  part, 
and  that  the  presence  of  St.  Nicholas  may  be  thought  to 
imply  that  of  some  heathen  precursor.  It  will,  however,  be 
seen  shortly  that  St.  Nicholas  may  have  got  into  these 
processions  through  a  different  train  of  ideas,  equally  con- 
nected with  the  Kalends,  but  not  with  the  strictly  agricultural 
aspect  of  that  festival.  But  of  the  continuity  of  the  beast- 
masks  and  other  horrors  of  these  Christmas  processions  with 
those  condemned  in  the  prohibitions,  there  can  be  no  doubt 2. 
A  few  other  survivals  of  the  cervulus  and  its  revel  can  be 
traced  in  various  parts  of  Europe3. 

1  Bertrand,  314  ;  Arbois  de  Ju-  2  Tille,  D.  W.  109. 

bainville,   Cycl.  myth.  385;    Rhys,  s  C.  de  Berger  (1723),  Commen- 

C.  H.  77.  tatio  de  personis  vulgo  larvis  sen 

S  2 


260  FOLK  DRAMA 

The  sacrifices  of  cereals  and  of  the  juice  of  the  vine  or  the 
barley  are  exemplified,  the  one  by  the  traditional  furmenty, 
plum-porridge,  mince-pie,  souling-cake,  Yule-dough,  Twelfth 
night  cake,  pain  de  calende,  and  other  forms  of  'feasten' 
cake 1 ;  the  other  by  the  wassail-bowl  with  its  bobbing 
apple2.  The  summer  'youling '  or  '  tree-wassailing '  is  repeated 
in  the  orchard3,  and  a  curious  Herefordshire  custom  represents 
an  extension  of  the  same  principle  to  the  ox-byre4.  A  German 
hen-yard  custom  requires  mixed  corn,  for  the  familiar  reason 
that  every  kind  of  crop  must  be  included  in  the  sacrifice  5. 

Human  sacrifice  has  been  preserved  in  the  whipping  of 
boys  on  Innocents'  day,  because  it  could  be  turned  into 
the  symbol  of  a  Christian  myth6.  It  is  preserved  also,  as 
throughout  the  summer,  in  the  custom,  Roman  as  well  as 
Germano-Keltic,  of  electing  a  mock  or  temporary  king.  Of 
such  the  Epiphany  king  or  '  king  of  the  bean  '  is,  especially  in 
France,  the  best  known7.     Here  again,  the  association  with 


mascharis,  218  'Vecolo  aut  cer- 
volo  facere ;  hoc  est  sub  forma 
vitulae  aut  cervuli  per  plateas  dis- 
currere,  ut  apud  nos  in  festis  Bac- 
chanalibus  vulgo  dicitur  correr  la 
tora';  J.  Ihre  (11769),  G/oss.  Suio-' 
Gothicum,  s.  v.  Jul.  '  Julbock  est 
ludicrum,  quo  tempore  hoc  pellem 
et  formam  arietis  induunt  adoles- 
centuli  et  ita  adstantibus  incursant. 
Credo  idem  hoc  esse  quod  exteri 
scriptores  cervulum  appellant.'  In 
the  Life  of  Bishop  Ami  (nat.  1237) 
it  is  recorded  how  in  his  youth  he 
once  joined  in  a  scinnleic  or  '  hide- 
play  '  (C.  P.  B.  ii.  385).  Frazer,  ii. 
447,  describes  the  New  Year  custom 
of  colhcinn  in  Scotland  and  St. 
Kilda.  A  man  clad  in  a  cowhide 
is  driven  deasil  round  each  house 
to  bless  it.  Bits  of  hide  are  also 
burnt  for  amulets.  Probably  the 
favourite  Christmas  game  of  Blind 
Man's  Buff  was  originally  a  scinnleic 
(N.  W.  Thomas,  in  F.  L.  xi.  262). 

1  Brand,  i.  210,  217;  Jackson  and 
Burne,  381,  392,  407;  Ashton,  178  ; 
Jahn,  487,  500;  MiiHer,  487,  500. 
Scandinavian  countries  bake  the 
Christmas  'Yule-boar.'  Often  this 
is  made  from  the  last  sheaf  and 


the  crumbs  mixed  with  the  seed- 
corn  (Frazer,  ii.  29).  Germany  has 
its  Martinshorner  (Jahn,  250 ; 
Pfannenschmidt,  215). 

2  Dyer,  501  ;  Ashton,  214. 

3  Brand,  i.  19;  Dyer,  21,  447; 
Ashton,  86,  233.  Brand,  i.  210,  de- 
scribes a  Hallow-e'en  custom  in  the 
Isle  of  Lewis  of  pouring  a  cup  of 
ale  in  the  sea  to  '  Shony,'  a  sea  god. 

4  Brand,  i.  14;  Dyer,  22,  448; 
Northall,  187.  A  cake  with  a  hole 
in  the  middle  is  hung  on  the  horn 
of  the  leading  ox. 

5  Grimm,  iv.  1808.  Hens  are 
fed  on  New  Year's  day  with  mixed 
corn  to  make  them  lay  well. 

6  Gregory,  Posthwna,  113  'It 
hath  been  a  Custom,  and  yet  is  else- 
where, to  whip  up  the  Children  upon 
Innocents-Day  morning,  that  the 
memory  of  this  Murther  might  stick 
the  closer,  and  in  a  moderate  pro- 
portion to  act  over  the  cruelty  again 
in  kind.'  In  Germany,  adults  are 
beaten  (Grimm,  iv.  1820).  In 
mediaeval  France  '  innocenter,' 
'  donner  les  innocents,'  was  a  cus- 
tom exactly  parallel  to  the  Easter 
prisio  (Rigollot,  138,  173). 

7  Dyer,  24 ;  Cortet,  32 ;  Frazer, 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS 


261 


the  three  kings  or  Magi  has  doubtless  prolonged  his  sway. 
But  he  is  not  unparalleled.  The  rex  autumnalis  of  Bath  is 
perhaps  a  harvest  rather  than  a  beginning  of  winter  king1. 
But  the  shoemakers  choose  their  King  Crispin  on  October  25, 
the  day  of  their  patron  saints,  Crispin  and  Crispinian ;  on 
St.  Clement's  (November  23)  the  Woolwich  blacksmiths  have 
their  King  Clem,  and  the  maidens  of  Peterborough  and  else- 
where a  queen  on  St.  Catherine's  (November  25).  Tenby, 
again,  elects  its  Christmas  mock  mayor2.  At  York,  the  pro- 
claiming of  Yule  by  'Yule '  and  'Yule's  wife '  on  St.  Thomas's 
day  was  once  a  notable  pageant 3.  At  Norwich,  the  riding  of 
a  '  kyng  of  Crestemesse '  was  the  occasion  of  a  serious  riot  in 
1443 4.     These  may  be  regarded   as   'folk'  versions   of  the 


iii.  143 ;  Deslyons,  Traitfc  contre 
le  Paganisme  du  Roi  boit  (2nd  ed. 
1670).  The  accounts  of  Edward  II 
record  a  gift  to  the  rex  fabae  on 
January  1,  1316  (Archaeologia,xxvi. 
342).  Payments  to  the  '  King  of 
Bene '  and  '  for  furnissing  his  graith' 
were  made  by  James  IV  of  Scot- 
land between  1490  and  1503  (L.  H. 
T.  Accounts,  I.  ccxliii ;  II.  xxiv, 
xxxi,  &c).  The  familiar  mode  of 
choosing  the  king  is  thus  described 
at  Mont  St.  Michel  '  In  vigilia 
Epyphaniae  ad  prandium  habeant 
fratres  gastellos  et  ponatur  faba 
in  uno ;  et  frater  qui  inveniet 
fabam,  vocabitur  rex  et  sedebit  ad 
magnam  mensam,  et  scilicet  sedebit 
ad  vesperas  ad  matutinam  et  ad 
magnam  missam  in  cathedra  pa- 
rata'  (Gast£,  53).  The  pre-eminence 
of  the  bean,  largest  of  cereals,  in 
the  mixed  cereal  cake  (cf.  ch.  vi) 
presents  no  great  difficulty  ;  on  the 
religious  significance  attached  to 
it  in  South  Europe,  cf.  W.  W. 
Fowler,  94,  no,  130.  Lady  Jane 
Grey  was  scornfully  dubbed  a 
Twelfth  -  day  queen  by  Noailles 
(Froude,  v.  206),  just  as  the  Bruce's 
wife  held  her  lord  a  summer  king 
(ch.  viii). 

1  Accts.  of  St.  Michael's,  Bath, 
s.  ann.  1487,  1490,  1492  (Somerset 
Arch.  Soc. Trans.  1878,  1879,  1883). 
One  entry  is  '  pro  corona  conducta 
Regi  Attumnali.'    The  learned  edi- 


tor explains  this  as  '  a  quest  con- 
ducted by  the  King's  Attorney' ! 

2  Ashton,   119;  Dyer,  388,  423, 
427. 

3  Brand,  i.  261,  prints  from  Le- 
land,  Itinerary  (ed.  1769),  iv.  182, 
a  description  of  the  proclamation 
of  Youle  by  the  sheriffs  at  the 
'  Youle-Girth '  and  throughout  the 
city.  In  Davies,  270,  is  a  letter  from 
Archbp.  Grindal  and  other  eccle- 
siastical commissioners  to  the  Lord 
Mayor,  dated  November  13,  1572, 
blaming  'a  very  rude  and  barba- 
rouse  custome  maynteyned  in  this 
citie  and  in  no  other  citie  or  towne 
of  this  realme  to  our  knowledge, 
that  yerely  upon  St.  Thomas  day 
before  Christmas  twoo  disguysed 
persons,  called  Yule  and  Yule's 
wife,  shoulde  ryde  throughe  the 
citie  very  undecently  and  uncome- 
ly ..  .'  Hereupon  the  council  sup- 
pressed the  riding.  Drake,  Ebora- 
cum  (1736),  217,  says  that  originally 
a  friar  rode  backwards  and  '  painted 
like  a  Jew.'  He  gives  an  historical 
legend  to  account  for  the  origin  of 
the  custom.  Religious  interludes 
were  played  on  the  same  day : 
cf.  Representations.  The  '  Yule  '  of 
York  was  perhaps  less  a  '  king  ' 
than  a  symbolical  personage  like 
the  modern  '  Old  Father  Christ- 
mas.' 

4  Ramsay,    Y.   and    L.    ii.    52  ; 
Blomefield,   Hist,   of  Norfolk,    iii. 


.'262  FOLK  DRAMA 

mock  king.  Others,  in  which  the  folk  were  less  concerned, 
will  be  the  subject  of  chapters  to  follow. 

Before  passing  to  a  fresh  group  of  Christmas  customs, 
I  must  note  the  presence  of  one  more  bit  of  ritual  closely- 
related  to  sacrificial  survivals.  That  is,  the  man  masquerad- 
ing in  woman's  clothes,  in  whom  we  have  found  a  last  faint 
reminiscence  of  the  once  exclusive  supremacy  of  women  in 
the  conduct  of  agricultural  worship.  At  Rome,  musicians 
dressed  as  women  paraded  the  city,  not  on  the  Kalends,  but 
on  the  Ides  of  January 1.  The  Fathers,  however,  know  such 
disguising  as  a  Kalends  custom,  and  a  condemnation  of  it 
often  accompanies  that  of  beast-mimicry,  from  the  fourth  to 
the  eighth  century  2. 

The  winter  festival  is  thus,  like  the  summer  festivals, 
a  moment  in  the  cycle  of  agricultural  ritual,  and  is  therefore 
shared  in  by  the  whole  village  in  common.  It  is  also,  and 
from  the  time  of  the  institution  of  harvest  perhaps  pre- 
eminently, a  festival  of  the  family  and  the  homestead.  This 
side  of  it  finds  various  manifestations.  There  is  the  solemn 
renewal  of  the  undying  fire  upon  the  hearth,  the  central 
symbol  and  almost  condition  of  the  existence  of  the  family 
as  such.  This  survives  in  the  institution  of  the  '  Yule-losr,' 
which  throughout  the  Germano-Keltic  area  is  lighted  on 
Christmas   or  more  rarely  New  Year's  eve,  and  must  burn, 

149.     The    riot    was    against    the  should  end  with  the  twelve  monethes 

Abbot   of   St.   Benet's    Holm,  and  of  the  yere,  aforn  hym  yche  moneth 

the  monks  declared  that  one  John  disguysed  after  the  seson  requiryd, 

Gladman  was  set  up  as  a  king,  an  and  Lenton  clad  in  whyte  and  red 

act  of  treason   against  Henry  VI.  heryngs  skinns,  and  his  hors trapped 

The  city  was  fined    1,000  marks,  with    oystyr-shells    after    him,    in 

In  1448  they  set  forth  their  wrongs  token  that  sadnesse  shuld  folowe, 

in  a  '  Bill'  and  explained  that  Glad-  and  an  holy  tyme,  and  so  rode  in 

man  '  who  was  ever,  and  at  thys  diverse  stretis  of  the  cite,  with  other 

our  is,  a  man  of  sad  disposition,  people,  with  hym  disguysed  makyng 

and  trewe  and  feythfull  to  God  and  myrth,  disportes  and  plays.' 

to  the  Kyng,  of  disporte  as  hath  *    Jevons,     Plutarch's    Romane 

ben    acustomed    in     ony    cite    or  Questions,  86.     The  Ides  (Jan.  9) 

burgh  thorowe  alle  this  realme,  on  must    have    practically    been     in- 

Tuesday  in  the  last  ende  of  Criste-  eluded    in    the    Kalends    festival, 

messe,  viz.  Fastyngonge  Tuesday,  The  Agonium,  probably  a  sacrifice 

made   a   disport   with  hys  neygh-  to  Janus,  was  on  that  day  (W.  W. 

bours,   havyng    his   hors    trappyd  Fowler,  282). 

with  tynnsoyle  and  other  nyse  dis-  2  Appendix  N,  Nos.  ix,  xi,  xiv, 

gisy  things,  coronned  as  kyng  of  xvii,  xviii,  xxviii,  xxxvi. 
Crestemesse,  in  tokyn  that  seson 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  263 

as  local  custom  may  exact,  either  until  midnight,  or  for  three 
days,  or  during  the  whole  of  the  Twelve-night  period,  from 
Christmas  to  Epiphany  \  Dr.  Tille,  intent  on  magnifying 
the  Roman  element  in  western  winter  customs,  denies  any 
Germano-Keltic  origin  to  the  Christmas  blaze,  and  traces  it 
to  the  Roman  practice  of  hanging  lamps  upon  the  house- 
doors  during  the  Saturnalia  and  the  Kalends2.  It  is  true 
that  the  Yule-log  is  sometimes  supplemented  or  even  replaced 
by  the  Christmas  candle  3,  but  I  do  not  think  that  there  can 
be  any  doubt  which  is  the  primitive  form  of  rite.  And  the 
Yule-log  enters  closely  into  the  Germano-Keltic  scheme  of 
festival  ideas.  The  preservation  of  its  brands  or  ashes  to  be 
placed  in  the  mangers  or  mingled  with  the  seed-corn  suggests 
many  and  familiar  analogies.  Moreover,  it  is  essentially  con- 
nected with  the  festival  fire  of  the  village,  from  which  it  is 
still  sometimes,  and  once  no  doubt  was  invariably,  lit,  afford- 
ing thus  an  exact  parallel  to  the  Germano-Keltic  practice  on 
the  occasion  of  summer  festival  fires,  or  of  those  built  to  stay 
an  epidemic. 

Another  aspect  of  the  domestic  character  of  the  winter 
festival  is  to  be  found  in  the  prominent  part  which  children 
take  in  it.  As  queteurs,  they  have  no  doubt  gradually 
replaced  the  elder  folk,  during  the  process  through  which, 
even  within  the  historical  purview,  ritual  has  been  trans- 
formed into  play.  But  St.  Nicholas,  the  chief  mythical  figure 
of  the  festival,  is  their  patron  saint ;  for  their  benefit  especially, 
the  strenae  or  Christmas  and  New  Year's  gifts  are  main- 
tained ;  and  in  one  or  two  places  it  is  their  privilege,  on  some 
fixed  day  during  the  season,  to  '  bar  out '  their  parents  or 
masters  4. 

Thirdly,  the  winter  festival  included  a  commemoration  of 

1  G.  L.  Gomme,  in  Brit.  Ass.  Rep.  No.  xxxviii)  forbids  a  Christmas 
(1896),  616  sqq. ;  Tille,  D.  W.  II,  candle  to  be  burnt  beneath  the 
Y.  and  C.  90  ;   Jahn,  253  ;    Dyer,      kneading-trough. 

446,466;  Ashton,  76,  219  ;  Grimm,  4  Miiller,  236;  Dyer,  430;  Ashton, 

iv.   1793,    1798,    1812,    1826,    1839,  54;     Rigollot,     173;     Records     of 

1841  ;  Bertrand,  in,  404;  Miiller,  Aberdeen   (Spalding   Club),    ii.  39, 

47&-  45,  66.     In  Belgium  the  household 

2  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  95.  keys  are  entrusted  to  the  youngest 
s  Dyer,  456;    Ashton,  125,   188.  child    on    Innocents'    day    (Durr, 

A    Lombard  Capitulary  (App.  N,      73). 


264  FOLK  DRAMA 

ancestors.  It  was  a  feast,  not  only  of  riotous  life,  but  of 
the  dead.  For,  to  the  thinking  of  the  Germano-Keltic 
peoples,  the  dead  kinsmen  were  not  altogether  outside  the 
range  of  human  fellowship.  They  shared  with  the  living  in 
banquets  upon  the  tomb.  They  could  even  at  times  return 
to  the  visible  world  and  hover  round  the  familiar  precincts  of 
their  own  domestic  hearth.  The  Germans,  at  least,  heard 
them  in  the  gusts  of  the  storm,  and  imagined  for  them  a 
leader  who  became  Odin.  From  another  point  of  view  they 
were  naturally  regarded  as  under  the  keeping  of  earth,  and 
the  earth-mother,  in  one  aspect  a  goddess  of  fertility,  was  in 
another  the  goddess  of  the  dead.  As  such  she  was  worshipped 
under  various  names  and  forms,  amongst  others  in  the  triad 
of  the  Matres  or  Matronae.  In  mediaeval  superstition  she 
is  represented  by  Frau  Perchte,  Frau  Holda  and  similar 
personages,  by  Diana,  by  Herodias,  by  St.  Gertrude,  just  as 
the  functions  of  Odin  are  transferred  to  St.  Martin,  St. 
Nicholas,' St.  John,  Hellequin.  It  was  not  unnatural  that 
the  return  of  the  spirits,  in  the  '  wild  hunt '  or  otherwise,  to 
earth  should  be  held  to  take  place  especially  at  the  two 
primitive  festivals  which  respectively  began  the  winter  and 
the  summer.  Of  the  summer  or  spring  commemoration  but 
scant  traces  are  to  be  recovered  * ;  that  of  winter  survives,  in 
a  dislocated  form,  in  more  than  one  important  anniversary. 
Its  observances  have  been  transferred  with  those  of  the 
agricultural  side  of  the  feast  to  the  Gemeinwoche  of  harvest 2 ; 

1  Saupe,  9;  Tille,  Y.andC.  118  ;  to  either  Feb.  21  (Feralia)  or  Feb. 

Duchesne,  267.    A  custom  of  feast-  22    (Cara    Cognatio) :    cf.   Fowler, 

ing  on  the  tombs  of  the  dead  on  306.     The  '  cibi '  mentioned  by  the 

the  day  of  St.  Peter  de  Cathedra  council  of  Tours  seem  to  have  been 

(Feb.    22)    is    condemned    by  the  offered  in  the  house,  like  the  winter 

Council    of    Tours    (567),    c.    23  offerings  described  below ;  but  there 

(Maassen,  i.   133)  'sunt  etiam  qui  is  also  evidence  for  similar  Germano- 

in  festivitate  cathedrae  domui  Petri  Keltic   offerings    on   the   tomb   or 

apostoli  cibos  mortuis  offerunt,  et  howe  itself ;  and  these  were  often 

post   missas    redeuntes   ad   domos  accompanied  by  dadsisas  or  dirges ; 

proprias,  ad  gentilium  revertuntur  cf.  Saupe,  Indiculus,   5-9.     Saupe 

errores,   et    post    corpus    Domini,  considers  the  spurcalia  in  Febru- 

sacratas  daemoni  escas  accipiunt.'  ario,  explained   above  (p.  114)  as 

1  do  not  doubt  that  the  Germano-  a  ploughing  rite,  to  be  funereal. 

Keltic     tribes     had    their     spring  2  Pfannenschmidt,  123,  165,  435  ; 

Todtenfest,  but   the   date   Feb.  22  Saupe,  9 ;  Golther,  586 ;  C.  P.  B. 

seems   determined  by  the  Roman  i.  43  ;   Jahn,  251.     The  chronicler 

Parentalia  extending  from  Feb.  13  Widukind,  Res  gestae  Sax.  (Pertz, 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  265 

but  they  are  also  retained,  at  or  about  their  original  date,  on 
All  Saints'  and  All  Souls'  days  * ;  and,  as  I  proceed  to  show, 
they  form  a  marked  and  interesting  part  of  the  Christmas 
and  New  Year  ritual.  I  do  not,  indeed,  agree  with  Dr.  Mogk, 
who  thinks  that  the  Germans  held  their  primitive  feast  of  the 
dead  in  the  blackest  time  of  winter,  for  it  seems  to  me  more 
economical  to  suppose  that  the  observances  in  question  have 
been  shifted  like  others  from  November  to  the  Kalends.  But  I 
still  less  share  the  view  of  Dr.  Tille,  who  denies  that  any  relics  of 
a  feast  of  the  dead  can  be  traced  in  the  Christmas  season  at  all2. 
Bede  makes  the  statement  that  the  heathen  Anglo-Saxons 
gave  to  the  eve  of  the  Nativity  the  name  of  Modranicht  or 
1  night  of  mothers,'  and  in  it  practised  certain  ceremonies 3. 
It  is  a  difficult  passage,  but  the  most  plausible  of  various 
explanations  seems  to  be  that  which  identifies  these  cere- 
monies with  the  cult  of  those  Matres  or  Malronae,  corre- 
sponding with  the  Scandinavian  disar,  whom  we  seem  justified 
in  regarding  as  guardians  and  representatives  of  the  dead. 
Nor  is  there  any  particular  difficulty  in  guessing  at  the  nature 
of  the  ceremonies  referred  to.  Amongst  all  peoples  the  cult 
of  the  dead  consists  in  feeding  them  ;  and  there  is  a  long 
catena  of  evidence  for  the  persistent  survival  in  the  Germano- 
Keltic  area  of  a  Christmas  and  New  Year  custom  closely 
parallel  to  the  alfablot  and  disablot  of  the  northern  jid.  When 
the  household  went  to  bed  after  the  New  Year  revel,  a  portion 
of  the  banquet  was  left  spread  upon  the  table  in  the  firm 
belief  that  during  the  night  the  ancestral  spirits  and  their 
leaders  would  come  and  partake  thereof.  The  practice, 
which  was  also  known  on  the  Mediterranean,  does  not  escape 

Mon.    SS.    iii.    423),    describes    a  rites    from    November.      For    the 

Saxon  three-days'  feast  in  honour  mediaeval  Gemeinwoche,  beginning 

of  a  victory  over  the  Thuringi   in  on  the  Sunday  after  Michaelmas, 

534.     He   adds  'acta   sunt   autem  was  common  to  Germany,  and  not 

haec  omnia,  ut  maiorum  memoria  confined  to  Saxony.     Michaelmas, 

prodit,  die  Kal.  Octobris,  qui  dies  the  feast  of  angels,  known  at  Rome 

erroris,  religiosorum  sanctione  viro-  in  the  sixth  century,  and  in  Germany 

rum  mutati  sunt  in  ieiunia  et  ora-  by  the  ninth,  also  adapts  itself  to 

tiones,  oblationes  quoque  omnium  the  notion  of  a  Todtenfest. 

nos  praecedentium  christianorum.'  J  Pfannenschmidt,  168,  443. 

This  is  probably  a  myth  to  account  2  Mogk,  in  Paul,  iii.  260;  Tille, 

for   the   harvest   Todtenfest,  which  Y.andC.loj. 

may  more  naturally  be  thought  of  3  Cf.  p.  231. 
as  transferred  with  the  agricultural 


266  FOLK  DRAMA 

the  animadversion  of  the  ecclesiastical  prohibitions.  The 
earlier  writers  who  speak  of  it,  Jerome,  Caesarius,  Eligius, 
Boniface,  Zacharias,  the  author  of  the  Homilia  de  Sacrilegiis, 
if  they  give  any  explanation  at  all,  treat  it  as  a  kind  of 
charm1.  The  laden  table,  like  the  human  over-eating  and  over- 
drinking, is  to  prognosticate  or  cause  a  year  of  plentiful  fare. 
The  preachers  were  more  anxious  to  eradicate  heathenism 
than  to  study  its  antiquities.  Burchardus,  however,  had  a 
touch  of  the  anthropologist,  and  Burchardus  says  definitely 
that  food,  drink,  and  three  knives  were  laid  on  the  Kalends 
table  for  the  three  Parcae,  figures  of  Roman  mythology  with 
whom  the  western  Matres  or  '  weird  sisters '  were  identified  2. 
Mediaeval  notices  confirm  the  statement  of  Burchardus. 
Martin  of  Amberg 3,  the  Thesaurus  Pauperum 4  and  the 
Kloster  Scheyern  manuscript5  make  the  recipient  of  the 
bounty  Frau  Perchte.  In  Alsso's  Largum  Sero  it  is  for 
the  heathen  gods  or  demons 6 ;  in  Dives  and  Pauper  for 
'  Atholde  or  GobelynV  In  modern  survivals  it  is  still  often 
Frau  Perchte  or  the  Perchten  or  Persteln  for  whom  fragments 
of  food  are  left ;  in  other  cases  the  custom  has  taken  on 
a  Christian  colouring,  and  the  ancestors'  bit  becomes  the 
portion  of  le  bon  Dieu  or  the  Virgin  or  Christ  or  the  Magi, 
and  is  actually  given  to  queteurs  or  the  poor 8. 

1  Appendix  N,  Nos.  xii,  xvii,  .  .  .  ut  inde  sint  eis  propitii  ad  pro- 
xxvii,  xxxiii,  xxxv,  xxxix.  speritatem    domus    et    negotiorum 

2  Appendix  N,  No.  xlii.  rerum  temporalium.' 

3  Martin  of  Amberg,  Gewissens-  6  Usener,  ii.  84  '  Qui  preparant 
Spiegel  (thirteenth  century,  quoted  mensam  dominaePerthae' (fifteenth 
Jahn,  282),  the  food  and  drink  century).  Schmeller,  Bairisck. 
are  left  for  '  Percht  mit  der  eisnen  Worterb.  i.  270,  gives  other  refer- 
nasen.'  ences  for  Perchte  in  this  connexion. 

4  Thes.   Patcp.   s.  v.    Superstitio  6  Usener,  ii.  58. 

(fifteenth  century,  quoted  Jahn,  282)  7  Dives    and  Pauper    (Pynson, 

'multi  credunt  sacris  noctibus  inter  1493)  '  Alle  that  .  .  .  use  nyce  ob- 

natalem    diem    Christi    et    noctem  servances  in  the  .  .  .  new  yere,  as 

Epiphaniae  evenire  ad  domos  suas  setting  of  mete  or  drynke,  by  nighte 

quasdam   mulieres,  quibus  praeest  on  the  benche,  to  fede  Atholde  or 

dominaPerchta . . .  multi  in  domibus  Gobelyn.'     In  English  folk-custom, 

in  noctibus  praedictis  post  coenam  food  is  left  for  the  house-spirit  or 

dimittunt   panem   et   caseum,    lac,  '  brownie '  on  ordinary  as  well  as 

carnes,   ova,  vinum,  et   aquam   et  festal    days ;    cf.    my    '  Warwick ' 

huiusmodi  super  mensas  et  code-  edition     of    Midsummer    Night's 

area,   discos,    ciphos,    cultellos    et  Dream,  145. 

similia  propter  visitationem  Perhtae  8  Jahn,  283  ;  Brand,  i.  18  ;  Ber- 

cum  cohorte  sua,  ut  eis  complaceant  trand,  405  ;  Cortet,  33,  45. 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  267 

It  is  the  ancestors,  perhaps,  who  are  really  had  in  mind 
when  libations  are  made  upon  the  Yule-log,  an  observance 
known  to  Martin  of  Braga  in  the  sixth  century  1,  and  still  in 
use  in  France2.  Nor  can  it  be  doubted  that  the  healths 
drunk  to  them,  and  to  the  first  of  them,  Odin,  lived  on  in  the 
St.  John's  minnes,  no  less  than  in  the  St.  Martin's  minnes,  of 
Germany 3.  Apart  from  eating  and  drinking,  numerous  folk- 
beliefs  testify  to  the  presence  of  the  spirits  of  the  dead  on 
earth  in  the  Twelve  nights  of  Christmas.  During  these  days, 
or  some  one  of  them,  Frau  Holle  and  Frau  Perchte  are 
abroad 4.  So  is  the  '  wild  hunt 5.'  Dreams  then  dreamt 
come  true 6,  and  children  then  born  see  ghosts  7.  The  wer- 
wolf, possessed  by  a  human  spirit,  is  to  be  dreaded8.  The 
devil  and  his  company  dance  in  the  Isle  of  Man9 :  in  Brittany 
the  korrigans  are  unloosed,  and  the  dolmens  and  menhirs 
disclose  their  hidden  treasures10.  Marcellus  in  Hamlet  de- 
clares : 

'  Some  say  that  ever  'gainst  that  season  comes 
Wherein  our  Saviour's  birth  is  celebrated, 
The  bird  of  dawning  singeth  all  night  long ; 
And  then,  they  say,  no  spirit  dare  stir  abroad ; 
The  nights  are  wholesome  ;   then  no  planets  strike, 
No  fairy  takes,  nor  witch  hath  power  to  charm, 
So  hallow 'd  and  so  gracious  is  the  time11.' 

The  folk-lorist  can  only  reply,  '  So  have  I  heard,  and  do  not 
in  the  least  believe  it.' 

1  Appendix  N,  No.  xxiii.     If  the         6  Grimm,  iv.  1798. 
words  '  in  foco '  are  not  part  of  the  7  Ibid.  iv.  1814. 

text, '  youling '  (cf.  pp.  142,  260)  may         8  Tille,  D.  W.  163;  Grimm,  iv. 

be  intended.  1782. 

2  Bertrand,  ill,  404.  9  Ashton,  104. 
8  Jahn,  120,  244,  269 :  the  Ger-         10  Miiller,  496. 

truden-minnes  on  St.  Gertrude's  day  "  Hamlet,  i.   1.    158.     I  do  not 

(March  1 7)  perhaps  preserve  another  know  where  Shakespeare  got  the 

fragment  of  the  spring  Todtenfest,  idea,  of  which  I  find  no  confirma- 

St.    Gertrude    here    replacing    the  tion ;  but  its  origin  is  probably  an 

mother-goddess ;    cf.    Grimm,    iii.  ecclesiastical  attempt  to  parry  folk- 

xxxviii.  belief.  Other  Kalends  notions  have 

4  Grimm,  i.  268,  273,  281  ;  Mogk,  taken  on  a  Christian  colouring. 
in  Paul,  iii.  279.  The  especial  day  The  miraculous  events  of  Christmas 
of  Frau  Perchte  is  Epiphany.  night  are  rooted  in  the  conception 

5  Mogk,  in  Paul,  iii.  260 ;  Tille,  that  the  Kalends  must  abound  in 
D.  IV.  173.  all  good  things,  in  order  that  the 


268 


FOLK  DRAMA 


The  wanderings  of  Odin  in  the  winter  nights  must  be  at 
the  bottom  of  the  nursery  myth  that  the  Christian  repre- 
sentatives of  this  divinity,  Saints  Martin  and  Nicholas  (the 
Santa  Claus  of  modern  legend),  are  the  nocturnal  givers  of 
strenae  to  children.  In  Italy,  the  fairy  Befana  (Epiphania), 
an  equivalent  of  Diana,  has  a  similar  function  \  It  was  but 
a  step  to  the  actual  representation  of  such  personages  for  the 
greater  delight  of  the  children.  In  Anspach  the  skin-clad 
Pelzmarten,  in  Holland  St.  Martin  in  bishop's  robes,  make 
their  rounds  on  St.  Martin's  day  with  nuts,  apples,  and  such- 
like 2.  St.  Nicholas  does  the  same  on  St.  Nicholas'  day  in 
Holland  and  Alsace-Lorraine,  at  Christmas  in  Germany 3. 
The  beneficent  saints  were  incorporated  into  the  Kalends 
processions  already  described,  which  in  the  sixteenth-century 
Germany  included  two  distinct  groups,  a  dark  one  of  devils 
and  beast-masks,  terrible  to  children,  and  a  white  or  kindly 
one,  in  which  sometimes  appeared  the  Jesus-Kind  himself4. 


coming  year  may  do  so.  But  allu- 
sions to  Christian  legend  have  been 
worked  into  and  have  transformed 
them.  On  Christmas  night  bees 
sing  (Brand,  i.  3),  and  water  is 
turned  into  wine  (Grimm,  iv.  1779, 
1809).  While  the  genealogy  is 
sung  at  the  midnight  mass,  hidden 
treasures  are  revealed  (Grimm,  iv. 
1840).  Similarly,  the  cattle  of 
heathen  masters  naturally  shared 
in  the  Kalends  good  cheer;  whence 
a  Christian  notion  that  they,  and 
in  particular  the  ox  and  the  ass, 
witnesses  of  the  Nativity,  can  speak 
on  that  night,  and  bear  testimony 
to  the  good  or  ill-treatment  of  the 
farmers  (Grimm,  iv.  1809,  1840)  ; 
cf.  the  Speculum  Perfectionis,  c. 
114,  ed.  Sabatier,  225  'quod  volebat 
[S.  Franciscus]  suadere  imperatori 
ut  faceret  specialem  legem  quod  in 
Nativitate  Domini  homines  bene 
providerent  avibus  et  bovi  et  asino 
et  pauperibus  ' :  also  p.  250,  n.  1. — 
Ten  minutes  after  writing  the  above 
note,  I  have  come  on  the  following 
passage  in  Tolstoi,  Resurrection 
(trad,  frang.),  i.  297  'Un  proverbe 
dit  que  les  coqs  chantent  de  bonne 
heure  dans  les  nuits  joyeuses.' 


1  Midler,  272. 

2  Pfannenschmidt,  207. 

3  Midler,  235,  239,  248. 

4  Tille,  D.  IV.  107 ;  Y.  and  C. 
116;  Saupe,  28;  Io.  lac.  Reiske, 
Comm.  ad  Const.  Porph.,  de  Caere- 
moniis,  ii.  357  (Corp.  Script.  Byz. 
1830)  'Vidi  puerulus  et  horrui 
robustos  iuvenes  pelliceis  indutos, 
cornutos  in  fronte,  vultus  fuligine 
atratos,  intra  dentes  carbones  vivos 
tenentes,  quos  reciprocato  spiritu 
animabant,  et  scintillis  quaqua- 
versum  sparsis  ignem  quasi  vome- 
bant,  cum  saccis  cursitantes,  in 
quos  abdere  puerulos  occursantes 
minitabantur,  appensis  cymbalis  et 
insano  clamore  frementes.'  He 
calls  them  '  die  Knecht  Ruperte,' 
and  says  that  they  performed  in 
the  Twelve  nights.  The  sacci 
are  interesting,  for  English  nurses 
frighten  children  with  a  threat  that 
the  chimney-sweep  (here  as  in  the 
May-game  inheriting  the  tradition 
on  account  of  his  black  face)  will 
put  them  in  his  sack.  The  bene- 
ficent Christmas  wanderers  use  the 
sack  to  bring  presents  in  ;  cf.  the 
development  of  the  sack  in  the 
Mummers'  play  (p.  215). 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  269 

It  is  perhaps  a  relic  of  the  same  merging  which  gives  the 
German  and  Flemish  St.  Nicholas  a  black  Moor  as  com- 
panion in  his  nightly  peregrinations l. 

Besides  the  customs  which  form  part  of  the  agricultural 
or  the  domestic  observances  of  the  winter  feasts,  there  are 
others  which  belong  to  these  in  their  quality  as  feasts  of  the 
New  Year.  To  the  primitive  mind  the  first  night  and  day 
of  the  year  are  full  of  omen  for  the  nights  and  days  that 
follow.  Their  events  must  be  observed  as  foretelling,  nay 
more,  they  must  as  far  as  possible  be  regulated  as  deter- 
mining, those  of  the  larger  period.  The  eves  and  days  of 
All  Saints,  Christmas,  and  the  New  Year  itself,  as  well  as 
in  some  degree  the  minor  feasts,  preserve  in  modern-folk-lore 
this  prophetic  character.  It  is  but  an  extension  and  systema- 
tization  of  the  same  notion  that  ascribes  to  each  of  the 
twelve  days  between  Christmas  and  Epiphany  a  special 
influence  upon  one  of  the  twelve  months  of  the  year  2.  This 
group  of  customs  I  can  only  touch  most  cursorily.  The 
most  interesting  are  those  which,  as  I  have  just  said,  attempt 
to  go  beyond  foretelling  and  to  determine  the  arrival  of  good 
fortune.  Their  method  is  symbolic.  In  order  that  the  house 
may  be  prosperous  during  the  year,  wealth  during  the  critical 
day  must  flow  in  and  not  flow  out.  Hence  the  taboos  which 
forbid  the  carrying  out  in  particular  of  those  two  central  ele- 
ments of  early  civilization,  fire3  and  iron  4.  Hence  too  the  belief 
that  a  job  of  work  begun  on  the  feast  day  will  succeed,  which 

1  Miiller,  235,  248.  some  of  the  cases  quoted  under  the 

2  A  mince-pie  eaten  in  a  different  last  reference  and  elsewhere,  nothing 
house  on  each  night  of  the  Twelves  may  be  taken  out  of  the  house  on 
(not  twelve  mince-pies  eaten  before  New  Year's  Day.  Ashes  and  other 
Christmas)  ensures  twelve  lucky  refuse  which  would  naturally  be 
months.  The  weather  of  each  day  taken  out  in  the  morning  were 
in  the  Twelves  determines  that  of  removed  the  night  before.  Ashes, 
a  month  (Harland,  99;  Jackson  of  course,  share  the  sanctity  of  the 
and  Burne,  408).  I  have  heard  of  fire.  Cf.  the  maskers'  threat  (p. 
a   custom   of   leaping   over  twelve  217). 

lighted    candles    on    New    Year's  *  Boniface  (App.  N,  No.  xxxiii) ; 

eve.      Each   that  goes  out  means  cf.  the  Kloster  Scheyern  (Usener, 

ill-luck  in  a  corresponding  month.  ii.  84)  condemnation  of  those  'qui 

3  Caesarius;  Boniface  (App.  N,  vomerem  ponunt  sub  mensa  tem- 
Nos.  xvii,  xviii,  xxxiii);  Alsso,  in  pore  nativitatis  Christi.'  For  other 
Usener,  ii.  65  ;  F.  L.  iii.  253  ;  Jack-  uses  of  iron  as  a  potent  agricultural 
son  and  Burne,  400;  Ashton,  in;  charm,  cf.  Grimm,  iv.  1795,  1798, 
Brit.  Ass.  Report  (1896),  620.     In  1807,  1816  ;  Burne-Jackson,  164. 


270  FOLK  DRAMA 

conflicts  rather  curiously  in  practice  with  the  universal  rustic 
sentiment  that  to  work  or  make  others  work  on  holidays  is 
the  act  of  a  churl1.  Nothing,  again,  is  more  important  to 
the  welfare  of  the  household  during  the  coming  year  than 
the  character  of  the  first  visitor  who  may  enter  the  house  on 
New  Year's  day.  The  precise  requirements  of  a  '  first  foot ' 
vary  in  different  localities ;  but  as  a  rule  he  must  be  a  boy 
or  man,  and  not  a  girl  or  woman,  and  he  must  be  dark-haired 
and  not  splay-footed 2.  An  ingenious  conjecture  has  con- 
nected the  latter  requirements  with  the  racial  antagonism  of 
the  high-instepped  dark  pre- Aryan  to  the  fiat-footed  blonde 
or  red-haired  invading  Kelt 3.  A  Bohemian  parallel  enables 
me  to  explain  that  of  masculinity  by  the  belief  in  the  in- 
fluence of  the  sex  of  the  '  first  foot '  upon  that  of  the  cattle 
to  be  born  during  the  year  4.  I  regret  to  add  that  there  are 
traces  also  of  a  requirement  that  the  '  first  foot '  should  not 
be  a  priest,  possibly  because  in  that  event  the  shadow  of 
celibacy  would  make  any  births  at  all  improbable  5. 

Some  of  the  New  Year  observances  are  but  prophetic  by 
second  intention,  having  been  originally  elements  of  cult. 
An  example  is  afforded  by  the  all-night  table  for  the  leaders 
of  the  dead,  which,  as  has  been  pointed  out,  was  regarded  by 

1  Cf.  Burchardus  (App.  N,  No.  intrant  domum  in  die  nativitatis, 
xlii) ;  Grimm,  iv.  1793,  with  many  quod  omnes  vaccae  generent  mas- 
other    superstitions    in    the    same      culos  et  e  con  verso.' 

appendix  to  Grimm  ;  Brand,  i.  9  ;  6  Miiller,  269  (Italy).    Grimm,  iv. 

Ashton,  222;  Jackson  and  Burne,  1784,  notes  '  If  the  first  person  you 

403.      The    practical    outcome    is  meet  in  the  morning  be  a  virgin  or 

to  begin  jobs  for  form's  sake  and  a  priest,  'tis  a  sign  of  bad  luck  ; 

then  stop.     The  same  is  done  on  if  a  harlot,  of  good ' :  cf.  Caspari, 

Saint    Distaff's    day,    January   7;  Horn,    de    Sacrilegiis,    §    11    'qui 

cf.  Brand,  i.  15.  clericum  vel  monachum   de  mane 

2  Harland,  117;  Jackson  and  aut  quacumque  hora  videns  aut 
Burne,  314;  Brit.  Ass.  Rep.  (1896),  o[b]vians,  abominosum  sibi  esse 
620;  Dyer,  483  ;  Ashton,  112,  119,  credet,  iste  non  solum  paganus, 
224.  There  is  a  long  discussion  in  sed  demoniacus  est,  qui  christi  mili- 
F.  L.  iii.  78,  253.  I  am  tempted  to  tern  abominatur.'  These  German 
find  a  very  early  notice  of  the  '  first  examples  have  no  special  relation 
foot '  in  the  prohibition  '  pedem  to  the  New  Year,  and  the  '  first 
observare '  of  Martin  of  Braga  foot'  superstition  is  indeed  only 
(App.  N,  No.  xxiii).  the  ordinary  belief  in  the  ominous 

3  F.  L.  iii.  253.  character  of  the  first  thing  seen  on 

4  Kloster  Scheyern  MS.  (fifteenth  leaving  the  house,  intensified  by 
century)    in    Usener,    ii.   84   '  Qui  the  critical  season. 

credunt,     quando     masculi     primi 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  271 

the  Fathers  who  condemned  it  as  merely  a  device,  with  the 
festal  banquet  itself,  to  ensure  carnal  well-being.  Another 
is  the  habit  of  giving  presents.  This,  though  widespread,  is 
apparently  of  Italian  and  not  Germano-Keltic  origin  l.  It  has 
gone  through  three  phases.  The  original  strena  played  a 
part  in  the  cult  of  the  wood-goddess.  It  was  a  twig  from 
a  sacred  tree  and  the  channel  of  the  divine  influence  upon 
the  personality  of  him  who  held  or  wore  it.  The  later  strena 
had  clearly  become  an  omen,  as  is  shown  by  the  tradition 
which  required  it  to  be  honeyed  or  light-bearing  or  golden 2. 
To-day  even  this  notion  may  be  said  to  have  disappeared,  and 
the  Christmas-box  or  Hrenne  is  merely  a  token  of  goodwill,  an 
amusement  for  children,  or  a  blackmail  levied  by  satellites. 

The  number  of  minor  omens  by  which  the  curiosity,  chiefly 
of  women,  strives  on  the  winter  nights  to  get  a  peep  into 
futurity  is  legion  3.  Many  of  them  arise  out  of  the  ordinary 
incidents  of  the  festivities,  the  baking  of  the  Christmas 
cakes 4,  the  roasting  of  the  nuts  in  the  Hallow-e'en  fire 5. 
Some  of  them  preserve  ideas  of  extreme  antiquity,  as  when 
a  girl  takes  off  her  shift  and  sits  naked  in  the  belief  that  the 
vision  of  her  future  husband  will  restore  it  to  her.  Others  are 
based  upon  the  most  naive  symbolism,  as  when  the  same  girl 
pulls  a  stick  out  of  the  wood-pile  to  see  if  her  husband  will  be 
straight  or  crooked 6.  But  however  diversified  the  methods, 
the  objects  of  the  omens  are  few  and  unvarying.  What  will 
be  the  weather  and  what  his  crops?  How  shall  he  fare  in 
love  and  the  begetting  of  children  ?  What  are  his  chances 
of  escaping  for  yet  another  year  the  summons  of  the  lord  of 
shadows  ?  Such  are  the  simple  questions  to  which  the  rustic 
claims  from  his  gods  an  answer. 

1  Tille,  D.  W.\%<)\  Y.  and  C.  84,  crossways.  This  was  called  liodor- 
95)  io4-  sdza,  a  term  which  a  glossator  also 

2  Cf.  p.  238.  uses  for  the  kindred  custom  of 
^  3  Brand,  i.  3,  209,  226,  257  ;  cervulus  (Tille,  Y.  and  C.  96).  Is 
Spence,  Shetland  Folk-Lore,  189  ;  the  man  in  Horn,  de  Sacr.  (App. 
Grimm,  iv.  1777-1848  passim;  N,  No.  xxxix)  '  qui  arma  in  campo 
Jackson  and  Burne,  176,  380,  &c,  ostendit '  taking  omens  like  the 
&c.  Burchardus  (App.  N,  No.  man  on  the  housetop,  or  is  he 
xlii)    mentions    that   the   Germans  conducting  a  sword-dance  ? 

took  New  Year  omens  sitting  girt  *  Burchardus  (App.  N,  No.  xlii). 

with  a  sword  on  the  housetop  or  6  Brand,  i.  209. 

upon    a    [sacrificial]    skin   at    the  9  Grimm,  iv.  1781,  1797,  1818. 


272  FOLK  DRAMA 

Finally,  the  instinct  of  play  proved  no  less  enduring  in  the 
Germano- Keltic  winter  feasts  than  in  those  of  summer.  The 
priestly  protests  against  the  invasion  of  the  churches  by  folk- 
dance  and  folk-song  apply  just  as  much  to  Christmas  as 
to  any  other  festal  period.  It  is,  indeed,  to  Christmas  that 
the  monitory  legend  of  the  dancers  of  Kolbigk  attaches 
itself.  A  similar  pious  narrative  is  that  in  the  thirteenth- 
century  Bonutn  Universale  de  Apibus  of  Thomas  of  Can- 
timpre\  which  tells  how  a  devil  made#  a  famous  song  of 
St.  Martin,  and  spread  it  abroad  over  France  and  Germany1. 
Yet  a  third  is  solemnly  retailed  by  a  fifteenth-century  English 
theologian,  who  professes  to  have  known  a  man  who  once 
heard  an  indecent  song  at  Christmas,  and  not  long  after  died 
of  a  melancholy 2.  During  the  seventeenth  century  folk  still 
danced  and  cried  'Yole'  in  Yorkshire  churches  after  the 
Christmas  services3.  Hopeless  of  abolishing  such  customs, 
the  clergy  tried  to  capture  them.  The  Christmas  crib  was 
rocked  to  the  rhythms  of  a  dance,  and  such  great  Latin 
hymns  as  the  Hie  iacet  in  canabulis  and  the  Resonat  in 
laudibus  became  the  parents  of  a  long  series  of  festival 
songs,  half  sacred,  half  profane  4.  In  Germany  these  were 
known  as  Wiegenlieder,  in  France  as  noels,  in  England  as 
carols ;  and  the  latter  name  makes  it  clear  that  they  are  but 
a  specialized  development  of  those  caroles  or  rondes  which 
of  all  mediaeval  chansons  came  nearest  to  the  type  of  Ger- 
mano-Keltic    folk-song.     A  single  passage   in   a    Byzantine 

1  Quoted    Pfannen schmidt,    489  s  Aubrey,  Gentilisme  and  Juda- 
5  quod    autem    obscoena    carmina      isme  {F.  L.  S.),  1. 

finguntur  a  daemonibus  et  perdi-  4  Tille,  D.   W.  55;  K.  Simrock, 

torum  mentibus  immittuntur,  qui-  Deutsche  Weihnachtslieder  (1854); 

dam   daemon  nequissimus,  qui  in  Cortet,  246  ;  Grove,  Diet,  of  Music, 

Nivella   urbe    Brabantiae    puellam  s.  v.  Noel;  Julian,  Diet,  of  Hymn. 

nobilem  anno  domini  1216  prose-  s. v.   Carol;  A.   H.   Bullen,   Carols 

quebatur,  manifeste   populis   audi-  and  Poems,  188  5;  Helmore,  Carols 

entibus  dixit :    cantum  hunc  cele-  for  Christmastide.   The  cry  '  Noel ' 

brem  de  Martino  ego  cum  collega  appears  in  the  fifteenth  century  both 

meo  composui  et  per  diversas  terras  in  France  and  England  as  one  of 

Galliae  et  Theutoniae  promulgavi.  general   rejoicing  without   relation 

Erat  autem  cantus  ille  turpissimus  to  Christmas.     It  greeted  Henry  V 

et  plenus  luxuriosis  plausibus.'     On  in  London  in  1415  and  the  Mar- 

Martinslieder  in  general  cf.  Pfan-  quis  of  Suffolk  in  Rouen  in  1446 

nenschmidt,  468,  613.  (Ramsay,  Lancaster  and   York,  i. 

2  T.  Gascoigne,  Loci  e  LidroVeri-  226;  ii.  60). 
latum  (1403-58),  ed.  Rogers,  144. 


NEW  YEAR  CUSTOMS  273 

writer  gives  a  tantalizing  glimpse  of  such  a  folk-revel  or  laiks 
at  a  much  earlier  stage.  Constantine  Porphyrogennetos  de- 
scribes amongst  the  New  Year  sports  and  ceremonies  of  the 
court  of  Byzantium  in  the  tenth  century  one  known  as  to 
TotOikov.  In  this  the  courtiers  were  led  by  two  '  Goths' wearing 
skins  and  masks,  and  carrying  staves  and  shields  which  they 
clashed  together.  An  intricate  dance  took  place  about  the 
hall,  which  naturally  recalls  the  sword-dance  of  western 
Europe.  A  song  followed,  of  which  the  words  are  preserved. 
They  are  only  partly  intelligible,  and  seem  to  contain  allu- 
sions to  the  sacrificial  boar  and  to  the  Gothic  names  of 
certain  deities.  From  the  fact  that  they  are  in  Latin,  the 
scholars  who  have  studied  them  infer  that  the  TotOikov  drifted 
to  Byzantium  from  the  court  of  the  great  sixth-century  Ostro- 
goth, Theodoric  1. 

1  Constantinus  Porphyrogenitus,  B.    Bieliaiev,    Byzantina,   vol.   ii  ; 

de  Caeremoniis  Aulae  Byzantinae,  Haupt's    Zeitschrift,    i.    368  ;     C. 

Bk.  i.  c.  83  (ed.  Reiske,  in  Corp.  KraMS,Gotischesl¥eiknachtsspiel,\r\ 

Script.  Hist.  Byz.  i.  38 1) ;  cf.  Bury-  Beitr.  z.  Gesch.  d.  deutschen  Sprache 

Gibbon,    vi.    516;    Kbgel,    i.    34;  und  Litteratur,  xx  (1895),  223. 


CHAMBERS.     1 


CHAPTER    XIII 
THE   FEAST   OF   FOOLS 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  best  recent  accounts  of  the  Feast  of  Fools 
as  a  whole  are  those  of  G.  M.  Dreves  in  Stimmen  aus  Maria-Laach  (1894), 
xlvii.  571,  and  Heuser  in  Wetzer  and  Welte,  Kirchenlexicon  (ed.  2),  iv. 
1.402,  s.  v.  Feste  (2),  and  an  article  in  Zeitschrift  ficr  Philosophic  und 
katholische  Theologie  (Bonn,  1850),  N.  F.  xi.  2. 161.  There  is  also  a  sum- 
mary by  F.  Lolie'e  in  Revue  des  Revues,  xxv  (1898),  400.  The  articles  by 
L.  J.  B.  Berenger-Feraud  in  Superstitions  et  Survivances (1896),  vol.  iv, and 
in  La  Tradition,  viii.  153  ;  ix.  1  are  unscholarly  compilations.  A  pamphlet 
by  J.  X.  Carre"  de  Busserolle,  published  in  1859,  I  have  not  been  able  to 
see ;  another,  or  a  reprint  of  the  same,  was  promised  in  his  series  of 
Usages  singuliers  de  Touraine,  but  as  far  as  I  know  never  appeared.  Of 
the  older  learning  the  interest  is  mainly  polemical  in  J.  Deslyons,  Traitez 
singuliers  et  nouveaux  contre  le  Paganisme  du  Roy-doit  (1670);  J.  B. 
Thiers,  De  Festorum  Dierutn  Imminutione  (1668),  c.  48  ;  Traite"  des  Jeux 
et  des  Divertissemens  (1686),  c.  33  ;  and  historical  in  Du  Tilliot,  Memoires 
pour  servir  d  VHistoire  de  la  Fete  des  Foux  (1741  and  1751) ;  F.  Douce, 
in  Archaeologia,  xv.  225  ;  M.  J.  R[igollot]  et  C.  L[eber],  Monnaies  incon- 
nues  des  E-veques  des  Innocens,  des  Fous,  &r*c.  (1837).  Vols,  ix  and  x  of 
C.  Leber,  Collection  des  meilleurs  Dissertations,  &*£.,  relatifs  d  PP/istoire 
de  France  (1826  and  1838),  contain  various  treatises  on  the  subject,  some 
of  them,  by  the  Abbe"  Lebeuf  and  others,  from  the  Mercure  de  France. 
A.  de  Martonne,Za  Pie'tS du  Moyen  Age  (1855),  202,  gives  a  useful  biblio- 
graphical list.  The  collection  of  material  in  Ducange's  Glossary,  s.vv. 
Deposuit,  Festum  Asini,  Kalendae,  &c,  is  invaluable.  Authorities  of  less 
general  range  are  quoted  in  the  footnotes  to  this  chapter :  the  most  im- 
portant is  A.  CheYest's  account  of  the  Sens  feast  in  Bulletin  de  la  Soc.  des 
Sciences  de  P  Yonne  (1853),  vol.  vii.  Cherest  used  a  collection  of  notes  by 
E.  Baluze  (1630-1718)  which  are  in  MS.  Bibl.  Nat.  135 1  (cf.  Bibl.  deFEcole 
des  Charles,  xxxv.  267).  Dora.  Grenier  (1725-89)  wrote  an  account  of 
the  Picardy  feasts,  in  his  Introduction  d  PHistoire  de  Picardie  (Soc.  des 
Antiquaires  de  Picardie,  Documens  inedits  (1856),  iii.  352).  But  many 
of  his  probata  remain  in  his  MSS.  Picardie  in  the  Bibl.  Nat.  (cf.  Bibl. 
de  PEcole  des  Charles,  xxxii.  275).  Some  of  this  material  was  used  by 
Rigollot  for  the  book  named  above.] 

The  New  Year  customs,  all  too  briefly  summed  up  in  the 
last  chapter,  are  essentially  folk  customs.  They  belong  to 
the  ritual  of  that  village  community  whose  primitive  organi- 
zation still,  though  obscurely,  underlies  the  complex  society 
of  western  Europe.  The  remaining  chapters  of  the  present 
volume  will  deal  with  certain  modifications  and  developments 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  275 

introduced  into  those  customs  by  new  social  classes  which 
gradually  differentiated  themselves  during  the  Middle  Ages 
from  the  village  folk.  The  churchman,  the  bourgeois,  the 
courtier,  celebrated  the  New  Year,  even  as  the  peasant  did. 
But  they  put  their  own  temper  into  the  observances  ;  and  it 
is  worth  while  to  accord  a  separate  treatment  to  the  shapes 
which  these  took  in  such  hands,  and  to  the  resulting  influence 
upon  the  dramatic  conditions  of  the  sixteenth  century. 

The  discussion  must  begin  with  the  somewhat  startling 
New  Year  revels  held  by  the  inferior  clergy  in  mediaeval 
cathedrals  and  collegiate  churches,  which  may  be  known 
generically  as  the  '  Feast  of  Fools.'  Actually,  the  feast  has 
different  names  in  different  localities.  Most  commonly  it  is 
the  festum  stidtorum,  fatuorum  or  follorum  ;  but  it  is  also 
called  the  festum  subdiaconorum  from  the  highest  of  the 
minores  ordines  who,  originally  at  least,  conducted  it,  and  the 
festum  bacidi  from  one  of  its  most  characteristic  and  sym- 
bolical ceremonies  ;  while  it  shares  with  certain  other  rites 
the  suggestive  title  of  the  '  Feast  of  Asses,'  asinaria  festa. 

The  main  area  of  the  feast  is  in  France,  and  it  is  in  France 
that  it  must  first  of  all  be  considered.  I  do  not  find  a  clear 
notice  of  it  until  the  end  of  the  twelfth  century1.  It  is  mentioned, 
however,  in  the  Rationale  Divinorum  Officium  (f  1182-90)  of 
Joannes  Belethus,  rector  of  Theology  at  Paris,  and  afterwards 
a  cathedral  dignitary  at  Amiens.  '  There  are  four  tripudia] 
Belethus  tells  us,  '  after  Christmas.  They  are  those  of  the 
deacons,  priests,  and  choir-children,  and  finally  that  of  the  sub- 
deacons,  quod  vocamus  stultorum,  which  is  held  according  to 
varying  uses,  on  the  Circumcision,  or  on  Epiphany,  or  on  the 
octave  of  Epiphany  V     Almost  simultaneously  the  feast  can 

1  Fouquier-Cholet,  Hist,  des  Circumcisione,  a  quibusdam  vero 
Comtes  de  Verjnaftdots,  159,  says  in  Epiphania,  vel  in  eius  octavis. 
that  Heribert  IV  (ob.  +1081)  per-  Fiunt  autem  quatuor  tripudia  post 
suaded  the  clergy  of  the  Verman-  Nativitatem  Domini  in  Ecclesia, 
dois  to  suppress  the.  fete  de  Pdne.  levitarum  scilicet,  sacerdotum, 
This  would  have  been  a  century  puerorum,  id  est  minorum  aetate 
before  Belethus  wrote.  But  he  et  ordine,  et  hypodiaconorilm,  qui 
does  not  give  his  probation,  and  ordo  incertus  est.  Unde  fit  ut 
I  suspect  he  misread  it.  ille   quandoque  annumeretur  inter 

2  Belethus,  c.  72  '  Festum  hypo-  sacros  ordines,  quandoque  non, 
diaconorum,  quod  vocamus  stulto-  quod  expresse  ex  eo  intelligitur 
rum,    a    quibusdam    perficitur    in  quod  certum  tempus   non    habeat, 

T  2 


276 


FOLK  DRAMA 


be  traced  in  the  cathedral  of  Notre-Dame  at  Paris,  through 
an  epigram  written  by  one  Leonius,  a  canon  of  the  cathe- 
dral, to  a  friend  who  was  about  to  pay  him  a  visit  for  the 
festum  bacilli  at  the  New  Year  1.  The  baculus  was  the  staff 
used  by  the  precentor  of  a  cathedral,  or  whoever  might  be 
conducting  the  choir  in  his  place 2.  Its  function  in  the  Feast 
of  Fools  may  be  illustrated  from  an  order  for  the  reformation 
of  the  Notre-Dame  ceremony  issued  in  J 199.  This  order 
was  made  by  Eudes  de  Sully,  bishop  of  Paris,  together  with 
the  dean  and  other  chapter  officers 3.  It  recites  a  mandate 
sent  to  them  by  cardinal  Peter  of  Capua,  then  legate  in 
France.  The  legate  had  been  informed  of  the  improprieties 
and  disorders,  even  to  shedding  of  blood,  which  had  given 
to  the  feast  of  the  Circumcision  in  the  cathedral  the  appro- 
priate name  of  the  festum  fatuorum.  It  was  not  a  time 
for  mirth,  for  the  fourth  crusade  had  failed,  and  Pope 
Innocent  III  was  preaching  the  fifth.  Nor  could  such 
spurcitia  be  allowed  in  the  sanctuary  of  God.     The  bishop 


et  officio  celebretur  confuso.'     Cf. 
ch.  xv  on  the  three  other  tripudia. 

1  Lebeuf,  Hist,  de  Paris  (1741), 
ii.  277  ;  Grenier,  365  : 

Ad  amicum  venturum  ad  festum 
Baculi. 
Festa  dies  aliis   Baculus    venit  et 
novus  annus, 
Qua  venies,  veniet  haec  mihi  festa 
dies. 
Leonius  is  named  as  canon  of  N.-D. 
in    the    Obituary    of    the    church 
Guerard,   Cartulaire    de  N.-D.   in 
{Doc.  inedits  sur  VHist.  de  France, 
iv.  34),  but  unfortunately  the  year 
of  his  death  is  not  given. 

2  During  the  fifteenth  century 
the  Chantre  of  N.-D.  'porta  le 
baston '  at  the  chief  feasts  as  ruler 
of  the  choir  (F.  L.  Chartier,  Van- 
cien  Chafitre  de  N.-D.  de  Paris 
(1897),  176).  This  baculus  must  be 
distinguished  from  the  baculus 
pastoralis  or  episcopi. 

3  Guerard,  Cartulaire  de  N.-D. 
{Doc.  ined.  sur  PHist.  de  France), 
i.  73  ;  also  printed  by  Ducange,  s.  v. 
Kalendae ;  P.  L.  ccxii.  70.  The 
ckarta,   dated   1198,   runs    in    the 


names  of 'Odo  [deSoliaco]  episco- 
pus,  H.  decanus,  R.  cantor,  Mauri- 
tius, Heimericus  et  Odo  archi- 
diaconi,  Galo,  succentor,  magister 
Petrus  cancellarius,  et  magister 
Petrus  de  Corbolio,  canonicus  Pari- 
siensis.'  Possibly  the  real  moving 
spirit  in  the  reform  was  the  dean 
Hfugo  Clemens],  to  whom  the  Paris 
Obituary  (Guerard,  loc.  cit.  iv.  61) 
assigns  a  similar  reform  of  the  feast 
of  St.  John  the  Evangelist.  Petrus 
de  Corbolio  we  shall  meet  again. 
Eudes  de  Sully  was  bishop  1196- 
1208.  His  Constitutions  (P.  L.  ccxii. 
66)  contain  a  prohibition  of  choreae 
...  in  ecclesiie,  in  coemeteriis  et  in 
processionibus.'  In  a  second  decree 
of  1 1 99  (P.L.  ccxii.  72)  he  provided 
a  solatium  for  the  loss  of  the  Feast 
of  Fools  in  a  payment  of  three 
deniers  to  each  clerk  below  the  de- 
gree of  canon,  and  two  deniers  to 
each  boy  present  at  Matins  on  the 
Circumcision.  Should  the  abuses 
recur,  the  payment  was  to  lapse. 
This  donation  was  confirmed  in 
1208  by  his  successor  Petrus  de 
Nemore  [P.L.  ccxii.  92). 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


277 


and  his  fellows  must  at  once  take  order  for  the  pruning  of 
the  feast.  In  obedience  to  the  legate  they  decree  as  follows. 
The  bells  for  first  Vespers  on  the  eve  of  the  Circumcision  are 
to  be  rung  in  the  usual  way.  There  are  to  be  no  chansons, 
no  masks,  and  no  hearse  lights,  except  on  the  iron  wheels  or 
on  the  penna  at  the  will  of  the  functionary  who  is  to  surrender 
the  cope  l.  The  lord  of  the  feast  is  not  to  be  led  in  pro- 
cession or  with  singing  to  the  cathedral  or  back  to  his  house. 
He  is  to  put  on  his  cope  in  the  choir,  and  with  the  precentor's 
baculus  in  his  hand  to  start  the  singing  of  the  prose  Laetcmur 
gandiis 2.  Vespers,  Compline,  Matins  and  Mass  are  to  be 
sung  in  the  usual  festal  manner.  Certain  small  functions  are 
reserved  for  the  sub-deacons,  and  the  Epistle  at  Mass  is  to 
be  '  farced 3.'  At  second  Vespers  Laetemur  gaudiis  is  to 
be  again  sung,  and  also  Laetabundus*.  Then  comes  an 
interesting  direction.  Deposuit  is  to  be  sung  where  it  occurs 
five  times  at  most,  and  '  if  the  baculus  has  been  taken,'  Vespers 
are  to  be  closed  by  the  ordinary  officiant  after  a  Te  Deum. 
Throughout  the  feast  canons  and  clerks  are  to  remain 
properly  in  their  stalls 5.     The  abuses  which  it  was  intended 


1  A  '  hearse '  was  a  framework  of 
wood  or  iron  bearing  spikes  for 
tapers  (Wordsworth,  Mediaeval 
Services,  156).  The  penna  was  also 
a  stand  for  candles  (Ducange,  s.v.). 

2  A  prosa  is  a  term  given  in 
French  liturgies  to  an  additional 
chant  inserted  on  festal  occasions 
as  a  gloss  upon  or  interpolation  in 
the  text  of  the  office  or  mass.  It 
covers  nearly,  though  not  quite,  the 
same  ground  as  Sequentia,  and 
comes  under  the  general  head  of 
Tropus  (ch.  xviii).  For  a  more 
exact  differentiation  cf.  Frere, 
Winchester  Troper,  ix.     Laetcmur 

Caudiis  is  a  prose  ascribed  to  Not- 
er  Balbulus  of  St.  Gall. 

3  cum  farsia  :  a  farsia,  farsa, 
or  far  sura  ( Lat./arcire, '  to  stuff'),  is 
a  Tropus  interpolated  into  the  text 
of  certain  portions  of  the  office  or 
mass,  especially  the  Kyric,  the 
Lectiones  and  the  Epistola.  Such 
farces  were  generally  in  Latin,  but 
occasionally,     especially     in     the 


Epistle,  in  the  vernacular  (Frere, 
Winchester  Troper,  ix,  xvi). 

4  Laetabufidus :  i.e.  St.  Bernard's 
prose  beginning  Laetabundus  exul- 
tet fidelis  chorus;  Alleluia  (Daniel, 
Thesaurus  Hymnologicus,  ii.  61), 
which  was  widely  used  in  the  feasts 
of  the  Christmas  season. 

5  The  document  is  too  long  to 
quote  in  full.  These  are  the  essen- 
tial passages.  The  legate  says : 
The  Church  of  Paris  is  famous, 
therefore  diligence  must  be  used 
'ad  exstirpandum  penitus  quod 
ibidem  sub  praetextu  pravae  con- 
suetudinis  inolevit  .  .  .  Didicimus 
quod  in  festo  Circumcisionis  Do- 
minicae  ...  tot  consueverunt  enor- 
mitates  et  opera  flagitiosa  committi, 
quod  locum  sanctum  .  .  .  non  solum 
foeditate  verborum,  verum  etiam 
sanguinis  effusione  plerumque  con- 
tingit  inquinari,  et  .  .  .  ut  sacratis- 
sima  dies  .  .  .  festum  fatuorum  nee 
immerito  generaliter  consueverit 
appellari.'   Odo  and  the  rest  order : 


278 


FOLK  DRAMA 


to  eliminate  from  the  feast  are  implied  rather  than  stated  ; 
but  the  general  character  of  the  ceremony  is  clear.  It  con- 
sisted in  the  predominance  throughout  the  services,  for  this 
one  day  in  the  year,  of  the  despised  sub-deacons.  Probably 
they  had  been  accustomed  to  take  the  canons'  stalls.  This 
Eudes  de  Sully  forbids,  but  even  in  the  feast  as  he  left  it  the 
importance  of  the  dominus  festi,  the  sub-deacons'  representa- 
tive, is  marked  by  the  transfer  to  him  of  the  baculus,  and 
with  it  the  precentor's  control.  Deposuit  potentes  de  sede :  et 
exaltavit  humiles  occurs  in  the  Magnificat,  which  is  sung  at 
Vespers  ;  and  the  symbolical  phrase,  during  which  probably 
the  bacillus  was  handed  over  from  the  dominus  of  one  year 
to  the  dominus  of  the  next,  became  the  keynote  of  the  feast, 
and  was. hailed  with  inordinate  repetition  by  the  delighted 
throng  of  inferior  clergy1. 


'  In  vigilia  festivitatis  ad  Vesperas 
campanae  ordinate  sicut  in  duplo 
simplici  pulsabuntur.  Cantor  faciet 
matriculam  (the  roll  of  clergy  for 
the  day's  services)  in  omnibus 
ordinate ;  rimos,  personas,  lumi- 
naria  herciarum  nisi  tantum  in 
rods  ferreis,  et  in  penna,  si  tamen 
voluerit  ille  qui  capam  redditurus 
est,  fieri  prohibemus ;  statuimus 
etiam  ne  dominus  festi  cum  proces- 
sione  vel  cantu  ad  ecclesiam  addu- 
catur,  vel  ad  domum  suam  ab 
ecclesia  reducatur.  In  choro  autem 
induet  capam  suam,  assistentibus 
ei  duobus  canonicis  subdiaconis,  et 
tenens  baculum  cantoris,  antequam 
incipiantur  Vesperae,  incipiet  pro- 
sam  Laetemur  gaudiis :  qua  finita 
episcopus,  si  praesens  fuerit  .  .  .  in- 
cipiet Vesperas  ordinate  et  solemni- 
ter  celebrandas ;  .  .  .  a  quatuor 
subdiaconis  indutis  capis  sericis 
Responsorium  cantabitur. . . .  Missa 
similiter  cum  horis  ordinate  cele- 
brabitur  ab  aliquo  praedictorum, 
hoc  addito  quod  Epistola  cum  farsia 
dicetur  a  duobus  in  capis  sericis, 
et  postmodum  a  subdiacono  .  .  . 
Vesperae  sequentes  sicut  priores 
a  Laetemur  gaudiis  habebunt  ini- 
tium :  et  cantabitur  Laetabundus, 
loco  hymni.  Deposuit  quinquies 
ad    plus    dicetur  loco  suo ;    et   si 


captus  fuerit  baculus,  finito  Te 
Deum  laudamus,  consummabuntur 
Vesperae  ab  eo  quo  fuerint  in- 
choatae.  .  .  .  Per  totum  festum  in 
omnibus  horis  canonici  et  clerici 
in  stallis  suis  ordinate  et  regulariter 
se  habebunt.' 

1  The  feast  lasted  from  Vespers 
on  the  vigil  to  Vespers  on  the  day 
of  the  Circumcision.  The  Haupt- 
moment  was  evidently  the  Magni- 
ficat in  the  second  Vespers.  But 
what  exactly  took  place  then  ?  Did 
the  cathedral  precentor  hand  over 
the  baculus  to  the  dominus  festi,  or 
was  it  last  year's  dominus  festi, 
who  now  handed  it  over  to  his 
newly-chosen  successor  ?  Probably 
the  latter.  The  dominus  festi  is 
called  at  first  Vespers  'capam  reddi- 
turus': doubtless  the  cope  and 
baculus  went  together.  The  domi- 
nus festi  may  have,  as  elsewhere, 
exercised  disciplinary  and  repre- 
sentative functions  amongst  the  in- 
ferior clergy  during  the  year.  His 
title  I  take  to  have  been,  as  at  Sens, 
precentor  stultorum.  The  order 
says,  '  si  captus  fuerit  baculus ' ; 
probably  it  was  left  to  the  chapter 
to  decide  whether  the  formal  instal- 
lation of  the  precentor  in  church 
should  take  place  in  any  particular 
year. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  279 

Shortly  after  the  Paris  reformation  a  greater  than  Eudes 
de  Sully  and  a  greater  than  Peter  de  Capua  was  stirred  into 
action  by  the  scandal  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  and  the  cognate 
tripudia.  In  1207,  Pope  Innocent  III  issued  a  decretal  to 
the  archbishop  and  bishops  of  the  province  of  Gnesen  in 
Poland,  in  which  he  called  attention  to  the  introduction, 
especially  during  the  Christmas  feasts  held  by  deacons, 
priests  and  sub-deacons,  of  larvae  or  masks  and  theatrales 
ludi  into  churches,  and  directed  the  discontinuance  of  the 
practice1.  This  decretal  was  included  as  part  of  the  per- 
manent canon  law  in  the  Deere  tales  of  Gregory  IX  in  1234  2. 
But  some  years  before  this  it  found  support,  so  far  as  France 
was  concerned,  in  a  national  council  held  at  Paris  by  the 
legate  Robert  de  Courcon  in  121 2,  at  which  both  regular 
and  secular  clergy  were  directed  to  abstain  from  the  festa 
follorum,  ubi  baculus  accipitur  3. 

It  was  now  time  for  other  cathedral  chapters  besides  that 
of  Paris  to  set  their  houses  in  order,  and  good  fortune  has 
preserved  to  us  a  singular  monument  of  the  attempts  which 
they  made  to  do  so.  The  so-called  Missel  des  Fous  of  Sens 
may  be  seen  in  the  municipal  library  of  that  city4.  It  is 
enshrined  in  a  Byzantine  ivory  diptych  of  much  older  date 

1  P.  Z..ccxv.  1070'Interdumludi  452).  I  cannot  verify  an  alleged 
fiunt  in  eisdem  ecclesiis  theatrales,  confirmation  of  the  decretal  by 
et  non  solum  ad  ludibriorum  specta-      Innocent  IV  in  1246. 

cula  introducuntur  in  eas  monstra  s  C.  of  Paris  (1212),  pars  iv.  c.  16 

larvarum,   verum  etiam   in    tribus  (Mansi,  xxii.   842)  '  A  festis   vero 

anni   festivitatibus,   quae   continue  follorum,    ubi     baculus    accipitur, 

Natalem  Christi  sequuntur,  diaconi,  omnino  abstineatur.     Idem  fortius 

presbiteri    ac    subdiaconi   vicissim  monachis   et   monialibus   prohibe- 

insaniae    suae    ludibria  exercentes,  mus.'      Can.    18    is    a   prohibition 

per    gesticulationum    suarum    de-  against  'choreae,'    similar  to   that 

bacchationes    obscoenas    in    con-  of  Eudes  de  Sully  already  referred 

spectu  populi   decus  faciunt   cleri-  to.     Such  general  prohibitions  are 

cale  vilescere.  .  .  .  Fraternitati  ve-  as    common    during    the    mediae- 

strae  .  .  .  mandamus,  quatenus  ...  val   period  as  during  that   of  the 

praelibatam  vero  ludibriorum  con-  conversion  (cf.ch.viii), and  probably 

suetudinem  vel  potius  corruptelam  covered  the  Feast  of  Fools.     See 

curetis  e  vestris  ecclesiis  .  .  .  exstir-  e.g.    C.   of  Avignon  (1209),  c.   17 

pare.'      As   to   the   scope    of    this  (Mansi, xxii.  791), C.ofPouen  (1231), 

decretal    and    the    glosses    of  the  c.  14  (Mansi, xxiii. 216),  C.  of  Bayeux 

canonists  upon  it,  cf.  the  account  (1300),  c.  31  (Mansi,  xxv.  661. 

of  miracle  plays  (ch.  xx).  *  Codex  Senonen.  46  A.     There 

2  Dccretales  Greg.  IX,  lib.  iii.tit.  i.  are  two  copies  in  the  Bibl.  Nat., 
cap.  12  (C.  /.  Can.  ed.  Friedberg,  ii.  (i)   Cod.  Parisin.    10520    B,  con- 


280  FOLK  DRAMA 

than  itself1.  It  is  not  a  missal  at  all.  It  is  headed  Officimn 
Circumcisionis  i?i  uswn  urbis  Senonensis,  and  is  a  choir-book 
containing  the  words  and  music  of  the  Propria  or  special 
chants  used  in  the  Hours  and  Mass  at  the  feast 2.  Local 
tradition  at  Sens,  as  far  back  as  the  early  sixteenth  century, 
ascribed  the  compilation  of  this  office  to  that  very  Petrus  de 


taining  the  text  only,  dated  1667  ; 
(ii)  Cod.  Parisin.  1351  C,  containing 
text  and  music,  made  for  Baluze 
(1630-17 1 8).  The  Officium  has  been 
printed  by  F.  Bourquelot  in  Bul- 
letin de  la  Soc.  arch,  de  Sens  (1858), 
vi.  79,  and  by  Clement,  125  sqq. 
The  metrical  portions  are  also  in 
Dreves,  Analecta  Hymnica  Medii 
Aevi,  xx.  217,  who  cites  other  Quel- 
len  for  many  of  them.  See  further 
on  the  MS.,  Dreves,  Stitnmen  aus 
Maria-Laach,  xlvii.  575  ;  Desjar- 
dins,  126  ;  Cherest,  14  ;  A.  L.  Millin, 
Monuments  antiques  inedits  (1802- 
6),  ii.  336';  Du  Tilliot,  13;  J.  A. 
Dulaure,  Environs  de  Paris  (1825), 
vii.  576;  Nisard,  in  Archives  des 
Missions  scientifiques  et  littdraires 
(1851),  187;  Leber,  ix.  344  (lAbbe 
Lebeuf).  Before  the  Officium  pro- 
per, on  f.  lvo  of  the  MS.  a  fifteenth- 
century  hand  (Cherest,  18)  has 
written  the  following  quatrain : 

'  Festum  stultorum  de  consuetudine 

morum 
omnibus  urbs  Senonis  festivat  no- 

bilis  annis, 
quo  gaudet  precentor,  sed  tamen 

omnis  honor 
sit      Christo      circumciso      nunc 

semper  et  almo '  : 

and  the  following  couplet : 

'  Tartara   Bacchorum  non    pocula 

sunt  fatuorum, 
tartara  vincentes  sic  hunt  ut  sa- 
pientes.' 

Millin,  loc.  cit.  344,  cites  a  MS. 
dissertation  of  one  Pere  Laire, 
which  ascribes  these  lines  to  one 
Lubin,  an  official  at  Chartres.  The 
last  eight  pages  of  the  MS.  contain 
epistles  for  the  feasts  of  St.  Stephen, 


St.  John   the  Evangelist,  and   the 
Innocents. 

1  Cherest,  14  ;  Millin,  op.  cit.  ii. 
336  (plates),  and  Voyage  dans  le 
Midi,  i.  60  (plates);  Clement,  122, 
162 ;  Bourquelot,  op.  cit.  vi.  79 
(plates)  ;  A.  de  Montaiglon,  in 
Gazette  des  Beaux-arts  (1880),  i.  24 
(plates) ;  E.  Molinier,  Hist,  gene- 
rate des  Arts  applique's,  i ;  Les 
Ivoires  (1896),  47  (plate)  ;  A.  M. 
Cust,  Ivory  Workers  of  the  Middle 
Ages  (1902),  34.  This  last  writer 
says  that  the  diptych  is  now  in  the 
Bibl.  Nationale.  The  leaves  of  the 
diptych  represent  a  Triumph  of 
Bacchus,  and  a  Triumph  of  Arte- 
mis or  Aphrodite.  It  has  nothing 
to  do  with  the  Feast  of  Fools,  and 
is  of  sixth-century  workmanship. 

2  Dreves,  575,  thinks  the  MS. 
was  '  fur  eine  Geckenbruderschaft,' 
as  the  chants  are  not  in  the  con- 
temporary Missals,  Breviaries,  Gra- 
duals,  and  Antiphonals  of  the 
church.  But  if  they  were,  a  sepa- 
rate Officium  book  would  be  super- 
fluous. Such  special  festorum  libri 
were  in  use  elsewhere,  e.g.  at 
Amiens.  Nisard,  op.  cit.,  thinks 
the  Officium  was  an  imitation  one 
written  by  '  notaires  '  to  amuse  the 
choir-boys,  and  cites  a  paper  of 
M.  Carlier,  canon  of  Sens,  before 
the  Historic  Congress  held  at  Sens 
in  1850  in  support  of  this  view. 
Doubtless  the  goliardi  wrote  such 
imitations  (cf.  the  missa  lusorum  in 
Schmeller,  Carmina  Burana,  248  ; 
the  missa  de  potatoribus  in  Wright- 
Halliwell,  Reliquiae  Antiquae,  ii. 
208  ;  and  the  missa  potatorum  in 
F.  Novati,  La  Parodia  sacra  nelle 
Letterature  moderne  (Studi  critici 
e  letterari,  289))  ;  but  this  is  too 
long  to  be  one,  and  is  not  a  bur- 
lesque at  all. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  281 

Corbolio  who  was  associated  with  Eudes  de  Sully  in  the 
Paris  reformation 1.  Pierre  de  Corbeil,  whom  scholastics 
called  doctor  opinatissimus  and  his  epitaph  Jlos  et  honor 
cleri,  had  a  varied  ecclesiastical  career.  As  canon  of  Notre- 
Dame  and  reader  in  the  Paris  School  of  Theology  he 
counted  amongst  his  pupils  one  no  less  distinguished  than 
the  future  Pope  Innocent  III  himself.  He  became  archdeacon 
of  Evreux,  coadjutor  of  Lincoln  (a  fact  of  some  interest 
in  connexion  with  the  scanty  traces  of  the  Feast  of  Fools 
in  England),  bishop  of  Cambrai,  and  finally  archbishop  of 
Sens,  where  he  died  in  1222.  There  is  really  no  reason  to 
doubt  his  connexion  with  the  Officium.  The  handwriting 
of  the  manuscript  and  the  character  of  the  music  are 
consistent  with  a  date  early  in  the  thirteenth  century2. 
Elaborate  and  interpolated  offices  were  then  still  in  vogue, 
and  the  good  bishop  enjoyed  some  reputation  for  literature 
as  well  as  for  learning.  He  composed  an  office  for  the 
Assumption,  and  is  even  suspected  of  contributions  in  his 
youth  to  goliardic  song 3.  It  is  unlikely  that  he  actually 
wrote  much  of  the  text  of  the  Officium  Circumcisionis,  very 
little  of  which  is  peculiar  to  Sens.  But  he  may  well  have 
compiled  or  revised  it  for  his  own  cathedral,  with  the  in- 
tention of  pruning  the  abuses  of  the  feast ;  and,  in  so  doing, 
he  evidently  admitted  proses  and  farsurae  with  a  far  more 
liberal  hand  than  did  Eudes  de  Sully.  The  whole  office, 
which  is  quite  serious  and  not  in  the  least  burlesque,  well 
repays  study.  I  can  only  dwell  on  those  parts  of  it  which 
throw  light  on  the  general  character  of  the  celebration  for 
which  it  was  intended. 

The  first  Vespers  on  the  eve  of  the  Circumcision  are  pre- 
ceded by  four  lines  sung  in  ianuis  ecclesiae: 

1  Cf.  the  chapter  decree  of  1524  Quantin,   '  archiviste   de    I'Yonne.' 

4  festum  Circumcisionis  a  defuncto  M.  Quantin  believes  that  the  hand 

Corbolio  institutum,' which  is  doubt-  is   that  of  a  charter  of  Pierre  de 

less  the  authority  for  the  statements  Corbeil,  dated  1201,  in  the  Yonne 

of  Taveau,  Hist,  archiep.  Senonen.  archives.  On  the  other  hand  Nisard, 

(1608),   94  ;    Saint-Marthe,    Gallia  op.  cit.,  and  Danjou,  Revue  de  ?nu- 

Ckristiana  (1770),  xii.  60;  Baluze,  sique  religieuse  (1847),  287,  think 

note  in  B.  N.  Cod.  Parisin.  135 1  C.  that  the  MS.  is  of  the  fourteenth 

(quoted  Nisard,  op.  cit.).  century. 

1  Dreves,  575;  CheVest,  15,  who  3  Cherest,  35;  Dreves,  576. 

quotes  an  elaborate  opinion  of  M. 


282  FOLK  DRAMA 

'  Lux  hodie,  lux  laetitiae,  me  iudice  tristis 
quisquis  erit,  removendus  erit  solemnibus  istis, 
sint  hodie  procul  invidiae,  procul  omnia  maesta, 
laeta  volunt,  quicunque  colunt  asinaria  festa.' 

These  lines  are  interesting,  because  they  show  that  the 
thirteenth-century  name  for  the  feast  at  Sens  was  the 
asinaria  festa,  the  « Feast  of  the  Ass.'  They  are  followed 
by  what  is  popularly  known  as  the  «  Prose  of  the  Ass,'  but 
is  headed  in  the  manuscript  Condtictus  ad  tabulam.  A  con- 
ductus  is  a  chant  sung  while  the  officiant  is  conducted  from 
one  station  to  another  in  the  church1,  and  the  tabula  is 
the  rota  of  names  and  duties  pro  cantu  et  lectura,  with  the 
reading  of  which  the  Vespers  began  2.  The  text  of  the  Prose 
of  the  Ass,  as  used  at  Sens  and  elsewhere,  is  given  in  an 
appendix3.  Next  come  a  trope  and  a  farsed  Alleluia,  a 
long  interpolation  dividing  'Alle-'  and  '  -luia,'  and  then 
another  passage  which  has  given  a  wrong  impression  of  the 
nature  of  the  office : 

'  Quatuor  vel  quinque  in  fa/so  retro  altare : 

Haec  est  clara  dies,  clararum  clara  dierum, 
haec  est  festa  dies,  festarum  festa  dierum, 
nobile  nobilium  rutilans  diadema  dierum. 

Duo  vel  tres  in  voce  retro  altare: 

Salve  festa  dies,  toto  venerabilis  aevo, 
qua  Deus  est  ortus  virginis  ex  utero  *.' 

1  Liturgically  a  conductus  is  a  cal  and  given  to  the  lower  voice 

form  of  Cantio,  that  is,  an  interpo-  only.'     The  term  is  several  times 

lation  in  the  mass  or  office,  which  used  in  the  Officium.  Clement,  163, 

stands    as    an    independent    unit,  falls  foul  of  Dulaure  for  taking  it 

and   not,   like   the  Tropes,  Proses  as   an    adjective    throughout,   with 

and  Sequences,  as  an  extension  of  asinns  understood, 

the  proper  liturgical  texts.  TheCan-  2  Wordsworth,   Mediaeval   Ser- 

tiones  are,  however,  only  a  further  vices,    289;      Clement,    126,    163. 

step  in   the   process  which   began  Dulaure  seems  to  have  taken  the 

with  Tropes  (Nisard,  op.  cit.  191 ;  tabula  for  the  altar.     The  English 

Dreves,  Anal.  Hymn.  xx.  6).  From  name  for  the  tabula  was  wax-brede. 

the  point  of  view  of  musical  science  An  example  (t  1500)  is  printed  by 

H.  E.  Wooldridge,  Oxford  Hist,  of  H.   E.   Reynolds,    Use    of  Exeter 

Music,  i.  308,  defines  a  conductus  Cathedral,  73. 

as  '  a  composition  of  equally  free  s  Appendix  L  ;  where  the  various 

and   flowing   melodies    in    all    the  versions  of  the  '  Prose '  are  collated, 

parts,  in  which  the  words  are  metri-  *  There  are  many  hymns  begin- 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


283 


The  phrase  in  falso  does  not  really  mean  '  out  of  tune.'  It 
means,  '  with  the  harmonized  accompaniment  known  as  en 
faux  bourdon',  and  is  opposed  to  in  voce,  '  in  unison  V  The 
Vespers,  with  many  further  interpolations,  then  continue,  and 
after  them  follow  Compline,  Matins,  Lauds  2,  Prime,  Tierce, 
the  Mass,  Sext,  and  second  Vespers.  These  end  with  three 
further  pieces  of  particular  interest  from  our  point  of  view. 
The  first  is  a  Condactus  ad  Bacidarium,  the  name  Bacularius 
being  doubtless  that  given  at  Sens  to  the  dominus  festi 3. 
This  opens  in  a  marked  festal  strain  : 

1  Novus  annus  hodie 
monet  nos  laetitiae 

laudes  inchoare, 
felix  est  principium, 
finem  cuius  gaudium 

solet  terminare. 
celebremus  igitur 

festum  annuale, 
quo  peccati  solvitur 

vinculum  mortale 
et  infirmis  proponitur 

poculum  vitale  ; 
adhuc  sanat  aegrotantes 

hoc  medicinale, 


riing  Salve,  festa  dies.  The  model 
is  a  couplet  of  Venantius  Fortu- 
natus,  Carmina,  iii.  9,  Ad  Felicem 
episcopum  de  Pascha,  39  (M.  G.  H. 
Auct.  Antiquiss.  iv.  1.  60)  : 

'  Salve,  festa  dies,  toto  venerabilis 
aevo, 
qua  Deus  infernum  vicit  et  astra 

tenet.' 
1  Clement,  127,  correcting  an 
error  of  Lebeuf.  A  still  more  curious 
slip  is  that  of  M.  Bourquelot,  who 
found  in  the  word  euouae,  which 
occurs  frequently  in  the  Officium, 
an  echo  of  the  Bacchic  cry  e'vohi1. 
Now  euouae  represents  the  vowels 
of  the  words  Seculorum  amen,  and 
is  noted  at  the  ends  of  antiphons  in 


most  choir-books  to  give  the  tone 
for  the  following  psalm  (Cldment, 

164). 

2  Clement,  138,  reads  Conductus 
ad  Ludos,  and  inserts  before  In 
Laudibus  the  word  Ludarius. 
Dreves,  Anal.  Hymn.  xx.  221,  reads 
Conductus  ad  Laudes.  The  sec- 
tion In  Laudibus,  not  being  me- 
trical, is  not  printed  by  him,  so  I 
do  not  know  what  he  makes  of 
Ludarius.  If  Clement  is  right, 
I  suppose  a  secular  revel  divided 
Matins  and  Lauds,  which  seems 
unlikely. 

3  I  follow  Dreves,  Anal.  Hymn. 
xx.  228.  Cldment,  151,  has  again 
Licdarium. 


284  FOLK  DRAMA 

unde  psallimus  laetantes 

ad  memoriale. 
ha,  ha,  ha, 

qui  vult  vere  psallere, 
trino  psallat  munere, 
corde,  ore,  opere 

debet  laborare, 
ut  sic  Deum  colere 

possit  et  placare.' 

The  Bacularius  is  then,  one  may  assume,  led  out  of  the 
church,  with  the  Conductus  ad  Poculum,  which  begins, 

'  Kalendas  Ianuarias 
solemnes,  Christe,  facias, 
et  nos  ad  tuas  nuptias 
vocatus  rex  suscipias.' 

The  manuscript  ends,  so  far  as  the  Feast  of  the  Circumcision 
is  concerned,  with  some  Versus  ad  Prandium,  to  be  sung  in 
the  refectory,  taken  from  a  hymn  of  Prudentius  1. 

The  Sens  Missel  des  Fous  has  been  described  again  and 
again.  Less  well  known,  however,  is  the  very  similar  Offi- 
cium  of  Beauvais,  and  for  the  simple  reason  that  although 
recent  writers  on  the  Feast  of  Fools  have  been  aware  of  its 
existence,  they  have  not  been  aware  of  its  habitat.  I  have 
been  fortunate  enough  to  find  it  in  the  British  Museum,  and 
only  regret  that  I  am  not  sufficiently  acquainted  with  textual 
and  musical  palaeography  to  print  it  in  extenso  as  an  appendix 
to   this  chapter2.     The  date  of  the  manuscript  is  probably 

1  Prudentius,  Catkemerinon,  iii.  archeologiques  (1856),  xvi.  259,  300. 

2  Egerton  MS.  2615  {Catalogue  Dreves,  Anal.  Hy?nn.  xx.  230 
of  Additions  to  MSS.  in  B.  M.  (1895),  speaks  of  it  as  'vielleicht 
1882-87,  p.  336).  On  the  last  noch  in  Italien  in  Privatbesitz.* 
page  is  written  '  Iste  liber  est  beati  This,  and  not  the  MS.  used  by 
petri  beluacensis.'  On  ff.  78,  nov  Ducange's  editors,  is  the  MS. 
are  book-plates  of  the  chapter  of  whose  description  Desjardins,  127, 
Beauvais,  the  former  signed  '  Vollet  168,  gives  from  a  1464  Beauvais 
f[ecit].'  The  MS.  was  bought  by  inventory:  '  N°.  76.  Item  ung  petit 
the  British  Museum  in  1883,  and  volume  entre  deux  ais  sans  cuir  Tung 
formerly  belonged  to  SignorPachia-  d'icelx  ais  rompu  a  demy  contenant 
rotti  of  Padua.  It  was  described  plusieurs  proses  antiennes  et  com- 
and  a  facsimile  of  the  harmonized  mencemens  des  messes  avec  orai- 
Prose  of  the  Ass  given  in  Annales  sons    commencant    au    iie   feuillet 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  285 

1227-34  \  Like  that  of  Sens  it  contains  the  Propria  for 
the  Feast  of  the  Circumcision  from  Vespers  to  Vespers. 
Unluckily,  there  is  a  lacuna  of  several  pages  in  the  middle  2. 
The  office  resembles  that  of  Sens  in  general  character,  but  is 
much  longer.  There  are  two  lines  of  opening  rubric,  of  which 
all  that  remains  legible  is  .  .  .  medio  stantes  incipit  cantor. 
Then  comes  the  quatrain  Lux  hodie  similarly  used  at  Sens, 
but  with  the  notable  variant  of  praesentia  festa  for  asinaria 
festa.  Then,  under  the  rubric,  also  barely  legible,  Conductus, 
quando  asinus  adducitur  3,  comes  the  '  Prose  of  the  Ass.'  At 
the  end  of  Lauds  is  the  following  rubric :  Postea  omnes  eant 
ante  ianuas  ecclesiae  clausas.  Et  quatuor  stent  /oris  tenentes 
singli  urnas  vino  plenas  cum  cyfis  vitreis.  Quorum  unus 
canonicus  incipiat  Kalendas  Ianuarias.  Tunc  aperiantur 
ianuac.  Here  comes  the  lacuna  in  the  manuscript,  which 
begins  again  in  the  Mass.  Shortly  before  the  prayer  for  the 
pope  is  a  rubric  Quod  dicitur,  ubi  apponatur  bacuhis,  which 
appears  to  be  a  direction  for  a  ceremony  not  fully  described 
in  the  Officium.  The  '  Prose  of  the  Ass  '  occurs  a  second 
time  as  the  Conductus  Subdiaconi  ad  Epistolam,  and  on  this 
occasion  the  musical  accompaniment  is  harmonized  in  three 
parts 4.  I  can  find  nothing  about  a  Bacularius  at  second 
Vespers,  but  the  office  ends  with  a  series  of  conductus  and 
hymns,  some  of  which  are  also  harmonized  in  parts.  The 
Officium  is  followed  in  the  manuscript  by  a  Latin  cloister  play 
of  Daniel^. 

An  earlier  manuscript  than  that  just  described  was  formerly 
preserved  in  the  Beauvais  cathedral  library.  It  dated  from 
11 60-80 6.  It  was  known  to  Pierre  Louvet,  the  seventeenth- 
century  historian    of   Beauvais 7,    and   apparently    to    Dom 

Belle bouche  et  au  pe'nultieme  cooper-  none  for  any  queen  of  France. 

turn  stolla  Candida.'    The   broken  2  Between  ff.  40™  and  41. 

board  was  mended,  after  420  years,  3  So   B.  M.  Catalogue,  loc.  cit. 

by  the  British  Museum  in  1884.  To  me  it  reads  like  '  Conductus  asi 

1  B.    M.     Catalogue,     loc.    cit.,  .  .  .  adducitur.' 

'  Written  in  the  xiiith  cent.,  prob-  *  F.  43. 

ably     during     the     pontificate     of  6  Cf.  ch.  xix. 

Gregory   IX  (1227-41)  and  before  6  Louis  VII    married   Adele   de 

the  marriage  of  Louis  IX  to  Mar-  Champagne   in   1160  and   died   in 

guerite  of  Provence  in  1234.'  There  1180. 

are  prayers  for  Gregorius  Papa  and  7  Pierre  Louvet,  Hist,  du  Dioc. 

Ludovicus  Rex  on  ff.  42,  42v,  but  de  Beauvais  (1635),  ii.  299,  quoted 


286  FOLK  DRAMA 

Grenier,  who  died  in  1789  \    According  to  Grenier's  account 
it  must  have  closely  resembled  that  in  the  British  Museum. 

'  Aux  premieres  vepres,  le  chantre  commencait  par  entonner 
au  milieu  de  la  nef :  Lux  hodie,  lux  laetitiae,  etc.  ...  A  laudes 
rien  de  particulier  que  le  Benedictus  et  son  repons  farcis.     Les 
laudes  finies  on  sortait  de  l'eglise  pour  aller  trouver  lane  qui 
attendait  a  la  grande  porte.     Elle  etait  fermee.     La,  chacun 
des  chanoines  s'y  trouvant  la  bouteille  et  le  verre  a  la  main, 
le  chantre  entonnait  la  prose :   Kalendas  ianuarias  solemne 
Chris te  facias.    Voici  ce  que  porte  l'ancien  ceremonial :  domi- 
nus  cantor  et  canonici  ante  ianuas  ecclesiae  clausas  stent  /oris 
tenentes  singuli  urnas  vini  plenas  cum  cyfis  vitreis,  quorum 
unus  cantor  incipiat :  Kalendas  ianuarias,  etc.     Les  battants 
de  la    porte  ouverts,  on  introduisait  lane  dans   l'eglise,  en 
chantant  la  prose :  Orientis  partibus.    Ici  est  une  lacune  dans 
le  manuscrit  j  usque  vers  le  milieu  du  Gloria  in  excelsis.  .  .  . 
On  chantait  la  litanie :  Christus  vincit,  Christus  regnat,  dans 
laquelle  on  priait  pour  le  pape  Alexandre  III,  pour  Henri 
de  France,  eveque  de  Beauvais,  pour  le  roi  Louis  VII  et  pour 
Alixe  ou  Adele  de  Champagne  qui  £tait  devenue  reine  en 
1 160  ;  par  quoi  on  peut  juger  de  l'antiquite  de  ce  ceremonial. 
L'livangile  etait  precede"  d'une  prose  et  suivi  d'une  autre.     II 
est  marque*  dans  le  ceremonial    de  cinq  cents   ans  que   les 
encensements  du  jour  de  cette  fete  se  feront  avec  le  boudin 
et  la  saucisse :  hoc  die  incensabitur  cum  boudino  et  saucila.' 

by  Desjardins,  124.  I  am  sorry  or  parts  of  them,  are  printed  by 
not  to  have  been  able  to  get  hold  F.  Bourquelot,  in  Bulletin  de  la  Soc. 
of  the  original.  Nor  can  I  find  arch,  de  Sens  (1854),  vi.  171  (which 
E.  Charvet,  Rech.  sur  les  anciens  also,  unfortunately,  I  have  not  seen), 
thedtres  de  Beauvais  (1881).  and  chants  from  them  are  in  Dreves, 
1  Grenier,  362.  He  says  the  Anal.  Hymn.  xx.  229.  But  here 
1  ceremonial '  is  '  tire*  d'un  ms.  de  Dreves  seems  to  speak  of  them  as 
la  cathe"drale  de  Beauvais,'  and  copies  of  Pacchiarotti's  MS.  {Eger- 
gives  the  footnote  'Preuv.  part  I,  ton  MS.  2615).  And  Desjardins, 
n°.  .'  On  the  prose  Kalendas  124,  says  that  Grenier  and  Bour- 
Ianuarias  and  the  censing  his  foot-  quelot  used  extracts  from  eighteenth- 
notes  refer  to  Ducange,  s.  v.  Kalen-  century  copies  of  Pacchiarotti's  MS. 
dae.  The  '  Preuves '  for  his  history  in  the  library  of  M.  Borel  de  Bre"- 
are  scattered  through  the  MSS.  tizel.  Are  these  writers  mistaken, 
Picardie  in  the  Bibl.  Nat.  No  or  did  Grenier  only  see  the  copies, 
doubt  the  reference  here  is  to  MSS.  and  take  his  description  from  Lou- 
14  and  158  which  are  copies  of  the  vet  ?  And  what  has  become  of  the 
Beauvais  office  (Dreves,  in  Stimmen  twelfth-century  MS.  ? 
aus  Maria-Laacn,xlvu.  575).  These, 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


287 


Dom  Grenier  gives  as  the  authority  for  his  last  sentence, 
not  the  Officium,  but  the  Glossary  of  Ducange,  or  rather  the 
additions  thereto  made  by  certain  Benedictine  editors  in 
1733-6.  They  quote  the  pudding  and  sausage  rubric  together 
with  that  as  to  the  drinking-bout,  which  occurs  in  both  the 
Officia.  as  from  a  Beauvais  manuscript.  This  they  describe  as 
a  codex  ann.  circiter  500 1.  It  seems  probable  that  this  was 
not  an  Officium  at  all,  but  something  of  the  nature  of  a 
Processional,  and  that  it  was  identical  with  the  codex  500 
annorum  from  which  the  same  Benedictines  derived  their 
amazing  account  of  a  Beauvais  ceremony  which  took  place 
not  on  January  1  but  on  January  14  2.  A  pretty  girl,  with 
a  child  in  her  arms,  was  set  upon  an  ass,  to  represent 
the  Flight  into  Egypt.  There  was  a  procession  from  the 
cathedral  to  the  church  of  St.  Stephen.  The  ass  and  its  riders 
were  stationed  on  the  gospel  side  of  the  altar.  A  solemn 
mass  was  sung,  in  which  Introit,  Kyrie,  Gloria  and  Credo 
ended  with  a  bray.  To  crown  all,  the  rubrics  direct  that  the 
celebrant,  instead  of  saying  Ite,  missa  est,  shall  bray  three 
times  {ter  hinhannabit)  and  that  the  people  shall  respond 
in  similar  fashion.  At  this  ceremony  also  the  '  Prose  of  the 
Ass'  was  used,  and  the  version  preserved  in  the  Glossary  is 
longer  and  more  ludicrous  than  that  of  either  the  Sens  or  the 
Beauvais  Officium. 

On  a  review  of  all  the  facts  it  would  seem  that  the  Beauvais 
documents  represent  a  stage  of  the  feast  unaffected  by  any 
such  reform  as  that  carried  out  by  Pierre  de  Corbeil  at  Sens. 
And   the   nature   of   that  reform  is  fairly  clear.     Pierre   de 


1  Ducange,  s.  v.  Kalendae,  '  MS. 
codice  Bellovac.  ann.  circiter  500, 
ubi  la  haec  occurrit  rubrica  Domi- 
nus  .  .  .  ianuae.  Et  alibi  Hac  .  . . 
saudia.' 

2  Ducange, s.v .Festum  Asinorum. 
Desjardins  and  other  writers  give 
the  date  of  the  '  codex '  as  twelfth 
century.  But  500  years  from  1733-6 
only  bring  it  to  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury. The  mistake  is  due  to  the 
fact  that  the  first  edition  of  Du- 
cange, in  which  the  '  codex '  is  not 
mentioned,  is  of  1678.      Clement, 


158,  appears  to  have  no  knowledge 
of  the  MS.  but  what  he  read  in 
Ducange ;  and  it  is  not  quite  clear 
what  he  means  when  he  says  that 
it  'd'apres  nos  renseignements,  ne 
renferme  pas  un  office,  mais  une 
sorte  de  my  stir e  posteYieur  d'un 
siecle  au  moins  a  l'office  de  Sens, 
et  n'ayant  aucune  autorite"  historique 
et  encore  bien  moins  religieuse.' 
The  MS.  was  contemporary  with 
the  Sens  Officium,  and.  although  cer- 
tainly influenced  by  the  religious 
drama  was  still  liturgic  (cf.  ch.  xx). 


288  FOLK  DRAMA 

Corbeil  provided  a  text  of  the  Officium  based  either  on  that 
of  Beauvais  or  on  an  earlier  version  already  existing  at  Sens. 
He  probably  added  very  little  of  his  own,  for  the  Sens  manu- 
script only  contains  a  few  short  passages  not  to  be  found  in 
that  of  Beauvais.  And  as  the  twelfth-century  Beauvais  manu- 
script seems  to  have  closely  resembled  the  thirteenth-century 
one  still  extant,  Beauvais  cannot  well  have  borrowed  from 
him.  At  the  same  time  he  doubtless  suppressed  whatever 
burlesque  ceremonies,  similar  to  the  Beauvais  drinking-bout 
in  the  porch  and  censing  with  pudding  and  sausage,  may  have 
been  in  use  at  Sens.  One  of  these  was  possibly  the  actual 
introduction  of  an  ass  into  the  church.  But  it  must  be 
remembered  that  the  most  extravagant  of  such  ceremonies 
would  not  be  likely  at  either  place  to  get  into  the  formal  service- 
books1.  As  the  Sens  Officium  only  includes  the  actual  service 
of  January  i  itself,  it  is  impossible  to  compare  the  way  in 
which  the  semi-dramatic  extension  of  the  feast  was  treated  in 
the  two  neighbouring  cathedrals.  But  Sens  probably  had  this 
extension,  for  as  late  as  1634  there  was  an  annual  procession, 
in  which  the  leading  figures  were  the  Virgin  Mary  mounted 
on  an  ass  and  a  cortege  of  the  twelve  Apostles.  This  did 
not,  however,  at  that  time  take  part  in  the  Mass  2. 

The  full  records  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  at  Sens  do  not 
begin  until  the  best  part  of  a  century  after  the  probable 
date  of  its  Officium.  But  one  isolated  notice  breaks  the 
interval,  and  shows  that  the  efforts  of  Pierre  de  Corbeil  were 
not  for  long  successful  in  purging  the  revel  of  its  abuses. 
This  is  a  letter  written  to  the  chapter  in  1245  by  Odo, 
cardinal  of  Tusculum,  who  was  then  papal  legate  in  France. 
He  calls  attention  to  the  antiqua  ludibria  of  the  feasts  of 
Christmas  week  and  of  the  Circumcision,  and  requires  these 

1  Cf.  Appendix  L,  on  an  Officium  He  describes  a  Rabelaisian  contre- 

(!553)  f°r  Jan-  I)  without  stulti  or  temps,  which  is  said  to  have  put  an 

asinus,  from  Puy.  end  to  the  procession  in  1634.     No 

Leber,  ix.  238.    This  is  a  note  authority  is  given  for  this  account, 

by  J.  B.  Salques  to  the  reprint  of  which  I  believe  to   be  the  source 

D'Artigny's   memoir   on    the  Fete  of  all   later   notices.      I    may  add 

des  Fous.      The   writer    calls    the  that     Ducange     gives     the    name 

ceremony  the   'fete   des    apotres,'  Festum  Apostolorum  to   the  feast 

and  says  that  it  was  held  at  the  of    St.   Philip   and    St.    James   on 

same  time  as  the  'fete  de  l'ane.'  May  1. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


289 


to  be  celebrated,  not  iuxta  pristinum  modum,  but  with  the 
proper  ecclesiastical  ceremonies.  He  specifically  reprobates 
the  use  of  unclerical  dress  and  the  wearing  of  wreaths  of 
flowers  \ 

A  little  later  in  date  than  either  the  Sens  or  the  Beauvais 
Officium  is  a  Ritual  of  St.  Omer,  which  throws  some  light 
on  the  Feast  of  Fools  as  it  was  celebrated  in  the  northern 
town  on  the  day  of  the  Circumcision  about  1264.  It  was  the 
feast  of  the  vicars  and  the  choir.  A  '  bishop  '  and  a  '  dean  ' 
of  Fools  took  part  in  the  services.  The  latter  was  censed 
in  burlesque  fashion,  and  the  whole  office  was  recited  at  the 
pitch  of  the  voice,  and  even  with  howls.  There  cannot  have 
been  much  of  a  reformation  here 2. 

A  few  other  scattered  notices  of  thirteenth-century  Feasts 
of  Fools  may  be  gathered  together.  The  Roman  de  Renard 
is  witness  to  the  existence  of  such  a  feast,  with  jeux  and 
tippling,  at  Bayeux,  about  12003.  At  Autun,  the  chapter 
forbade   the  baculus  anni  novi  in   1230 4.     Feasts  of  Fools 


1  Cod.  Senonens.  G.  133,  printed 
by  Cherest,  47 ;  Quantin,  Recueil 
de  pieces  pour  faire  suite  au  Car- 
tulaire  general  de  FYonne  (1873), 
235  (N°.  504)  '  mandamus,  quate- 
nus  ilia  festorum  antiqua  ludibria, 
quae  in  contemptum  Dei,  oppro- 
brium cleri ,  et  derisum  populi  non  est 
dubium  exerceri,  videlicet,  in  festis 
Sancti  Ioannis  Evangelistae,  Inno- 
centium,  et  Circumcisionis  Domini, 
iuxta  pristinum  modum  nullatenus 
faciatis  aut  fieri  permittatis,  sed 
iuxta  formam  et  cultum  aliarum 
festivitatum  quae  per  anni  circulum 
celebrantur,  ita  volumus  et  prae- 
cipimus  celebrari.  Ita  quod  ipso 
facto  sententiam  suspensionis  incur- 
rat  quicumque  in  mutatione  habitus 
aut  in  sertis  de  floribus  seu  aliis 
dissolutionibus  iuxta  praedictum 
ritum  reprobatum  adeo  in  prae- 
dictis  festivitatibus  seu  aliis  a  modo 
praesumpserit  se  habere.' 

2  L.  Deschamps  de  Pas,  Les 
Ce're'monies  religieuses  dans  la  Col- 
ligiale  de  Saint-  Omer  au  xiii"  Steele 
{Me"m.  de  la  Soc.  de  la  Morinie, 
xx.  147).  The  directions  for  Jan.  I 
are  fragmentary :    •  In   quo   vicarii 


ceterique  clerici  chorum  frequen- 
tantes  et  eorum  episcopus  se  ha- 
beantin  cantando  et  officiando  sicut 
superius  dictum  est  in  festo  Sancto- 
rum Innocentium  (cf.  p.  370),  hoc 
tamen  excepto  quod  omnia  quae 
ista  die  fiunt  officiando  quando  est 
festum  fatuorum  pro  posse  fiunt  et 
etiam  ullulando  .  .  .  domino  decano 
fatuorum  ferunt  incensum  sed  pre- 
postere  ut  dictum  est.'  Ululatus 
is,  however,  sometimes  a  technical 
term  in  church  music ;  cf.  vol.  ii.  p.  7. 

3  R.  de    Renard,    xii.   469    (ed. 
Martin,  vol.  ii.  14) : 

?  Dan  prestre,  il  est  la  feste  as  fox. 
Si  fera  len  demein  des  chox 
Et  grant  departie  a  Baieus  : 
Ales  i,  si  verres  les  jeus.' 

Branch  xii  of  the  Roman  is  the 
composition  of  Richart  de  Lison, 
who,  according  to  Martin,  suppl. 
72,  wrote  in  Normandy  1 1200. 
The  phrase  'faire  les  choux  '  =  '  get 
drunk,'  cabbages  being  regarded  as 
prophylactic  of  the  ill  effects  of 
liquor. 

4  Hist,     de    ritglise    d' Autun 
(1774),  469,631  'Item  innovamus, 


CHAMBERS.     I 


u 


290 


FOLK  DRAMA 


on  Innocents'  and  New  Year's  days  are  forbidden  by  the 
statutes  of  Nevers  cathedral  in  1246  *.  At  Romans,  in 
Dauphine,  an  agreement  was  come  to  in  1274  between  the 
chapter,  the  archbishop  of  Vienne  and  the  municipal  authori- 
ties, that  the  choice  of  an  abbot  by  the  cathedral  clerks 
known  as  esclaffardi  should  cease,  on  account  of  the  -dis- 
turbances and  scandals  to  which  it  had  given  rise2.  The 
earliest  mention  of  the  feast  at  Laon  is  about  1280 3;  while 
it  is  provided  for  as  the  sub-deacons'  feast  by  an  Amiens 
Ordinarium  of  1 29 1 4.  Nor  are  the  ecclesiastical  writers 
oblivious  of  it.  William  of  Auxerre  opens  an  era  of  learned 
speculation  in  his  De  Officiis  Ecclesiasticis,  by  explaining  it  as 
a  Christian  substitute  for  the  Parentalia  of  the  pagans5. 
Towards  the  end  of  the  century,  Durandus,  bishop  of  Mende, 
who  drew  upon  both  William  of  Auxerre  and  Belethus  for 


quod  ille  qui  de  caetero  capiet 
baculum  anni  novi  nihil  penitus 
habebit  de  bursa  Capituli '  {Registr. 
Capit.  s.  a.  1230). 

1  Martene  and  Durand,  Thesau- 
rus Anecdotorum,  iv.  1070  '  in  festo 
stultorum,  scilicet  Innocentium  et 
anni  novi  .  .  .  multa  fiunt  inhonesta 
.  .  .  ne  talia  festa  irrisoria  de  cetero 
facere  praesumant.' 

2  Ducange,  s.  v.  abbas  esclaffar- 
dorum,  quoting  Hist.  Delphin.  i. 
132  ;  J.  J.  A.  Pilot  de  Thorey, 
Usages,  Fetes  et  Continues  en  Dau- 
phine", i.  182.  The  latter  writer 
says  that  there  was  also  an  epi- 
scopus,  who  was  not  suppressed, 
that  the  canons  did  reverence  to 
him,  and  that  the  singing  of  the 
Magnificat  was  part  of  the  feast. 

3  C.  Hide-,  Bull,  de  la  Soc.  acad. 
de  Laon  (1863),  xiii.  115. 

4  Grenier,  361  '  Si  hoc  dicitur 
festum  stultorum  a  subdiaconis  fiat, 
et  dominica  eveniat,  ab  ipsis  fiat 
festum  in  cappis  sericis,  sicut  in 
libris  festorum  continetur.'  These 
libri  possibly  resembled  those  of 
Sens  and  Beauvais. 

5  Sunitna  Gulielmi  Autissiodo- 
rensis  de  Off.  Eccles.  (quoted  by 
Cherest,  44,  from  Bibl.  Nat.  MS. 
1411)  '  Quaeritur  quare  in  hac  die 
fit  festum  stultorum.  .  . .  Ante  ad- 


ventum  Domini  celeb rabant  festa 
quae  vocabant  Parentalia ;  et  in 
ilia  die  spem  ponebant  credentes 
quod  si  in  ilia  die  bene  eis  accideret, 
quod  similiter  in  toto  anno.  Hoc 
festum  voluit  removere  Ecclesia 
quod  contra  fidem  est.  Et  quia 
extirpare  omnino  non  potuit,  festum 
illud  permittit  et  celebrat  illud  fe- 
stum celeberrimum  ut  aliuddemitta- 
tur :  et  ideo  in  matutinali  officio 
leguntur  lectiones  quae  dehortantur 
ab  huiusmodi  quae  sunt  contra 
fidem  (cf.  p.  245).  Et  si  ista  die  ab  ec- 
clesia quaedam  fiunt  praeter  fidem, 
nulla  tamen  contra  fidem.  Et  ideo 
ludos  qui  sunt  contra  fidem  permu- 
tavit  in  ludos  qui  non  sunt  contra 
fidem.'  There  is  clearly  a  confusion 
here  between  the  Roman  Paren- 
talia (Feb.  13-22)  and  Kalendae 
(Jan.  1).  On  William  of  Auxerre, 
whose  work  remains  in  MS.,  cf. 
Lebeuf,  in  P.  Desmolets,  Me'moires, 
iii.  339  ;  Nouvelle  Biographie  uni- 
verselle,  s.  n.  He  was  bishop  of 
Auxerre,  translated  to  Paris  in  1220, 
ob.  1223.  He  must  be  distinguished 
from  another  William  of  Auxerre, 
who  was  archdeacon  of  Beauvais 
(fi23o),  and  wrote  a  comment  on 
Petrus  Lombardus,  printed  at  Paris 
in  1 500  (Grdber,  Grundriss  der  rom. 
Phtlologie,  ii.  1.  239). 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


291 


his  Rationale  Divinorum  Officiorum,  gave  an  account  of 
it  which  agrees  closely  with  that  of  Belethus1.  Neither 
William  of  Auxerre  nor  Durandus  shows  himself  hostile 
to  the  Feast  of  Fools.  Its  abuses  are,  however,  condemned 
in  more  than  one  contemporary  collection  of  sermons2. 

With  the  fourteenth  century  the  records  of  the  Feast  of 
Fools  become  more   frequent.     In    particular,  the   account- 
books    of  the    chapter    of  Sens   throw   some    light   on   the 
organization  of  the  feast  in  that  cathedral  3.     The  Compotus 
Camerarii  has,  from  1345  onwards,  a  yearly  entry  pro  vino 
praesentato     vicariis    ecclesiae     die     Circumcisionis    Domini. 
Sometimes  the  formula  is  varied  to  die  festi  fatuorum.     In 
course  of  time  the  whole  expenses  of  the  feast  come  to  be 
a  charge  on  the  chapter,  and  in  particular,  it  would  appear, 
upon  the  sub-deacon  canons4.     In  1376  is  mentioned,  for  the 
first   time,  the  dominus  festi,  to   whom   under  the   title   of 
precentor   et  provisor  festi  shdtorum   a   payment  is    made. 
The  Compotus  Nemorum  shows  that  by  1374  a  prebend  in 
the  chapter  woods  had  been  appropriated  to  the  vicars  pro 
festo  fatuorum.     Similar   entries   occur  to  the   end   of   the 


1  Gulielmlis  Durandus,  Rationale 
Div.  Off.  (Antwerp,  161 4),  vi.  15, 
de  Circumcisione,  '  In  quibusdam 
ecclesiis  subdiaconi  fortes  et  iuvenes 
faciunt  hodie  festum  ad  significan- 
dum  quod  in  octava  resurgentium, 
quae  significatur  per  octavam  diem, 
qua  circumcisio  fiebat,  nulla  erit 
debilis  aetas,  non  senectus,  non 
senium,  non  impotens  pueritia  .  .  . 
&c.'  A  reference  to  the  heathen 
Kalends  follows  ;  cf.  also  vii.  42,  de 
festis  SS.  Stephani,  Ioannis  Evang. 
et  Innocentium,  ' .  .  .  subdiaconi 
vero  faciunt  festum  in  quibusdam 
ecclesiis  in  festo  circumcisionis,  ut 
ibi  dictum  est  :  in  aliis  in  Epiphania 
et  etiam  in  aliis  in  octava  Epipha- 
niae,  quod  vocant  festum  stultorum. 
Quia  enim  ordo  ille  antiquitus  in- 
certus  erat,  nam  in  canonibus  anti- 
quis  (extra  de  aetate  et  qualitate) 
multis  quandoque  vocatur  sacer  et 
quandoque  non,  ideo  subdiaconi 
certum  ad  festandum  non  habent 
diem,  et  eorum  festum  officio  cele- 


bratur  confuso.'  On  Durandus  cf. 
the  translation  of  his  work  by 
C.  Barthe"lemy  (1854).  He  was 
born  at  Puymisson  in  the  diocese 
of  Beziers  (1230),  finished  the 
Rationale  (1284),  became  bishop  of 
Mende  (1285),  and  ob.  (1296). 

2  A.  Lecoy  de  la  Marche,  La 
Chaire  frangaise  au  M.  A.  368, 
citing  Bibl.  Nat.  MSS.fr.  133 14, 
f.  18;  16481,  N°.  93.  The  latter 
MS.,  which  is  analysed  by  Echard, 
Script.  Ord.  Predicatorum,  i.  269, 
contains  Dominican  sermons  de- 
livered in  Paris,  1272-3. 

3  Cherest,  49  sqq.,  from  Sens 
Chapter  Accounts  in  Archives  de 
V  Yonne,  at  Auxerre.  The  Com- 
potus Camerarii  begins  in  1295-6. 
The  Chapter  Register  is  missing 
before  1662  :  some  of  Baluze's  ex- 
tracts from  it  are  in  Bibl.  Nat.  Cod. 
Parisin.  135 1. 

4  Cherest,  55  '  pro  servitiofacien- 
do  die  dicti  festi  quatenus  tangit 
canonicos  subdiaconos  in  ecclesia.' 


U  2 


292 


FOLK  DRAMA 


fourteenth  century  and  during  the  first  quarter  of  the  fifteenth1. 
Then  came  the  war  to  disturb  everything,  and  from  1420 
the  account-books  rarely  show  any  traces  of  the  feast.  Nor 
were  civil  commotions  alone  against  it.  As  in  the  twelfth 
and  thirteenth  centuries,  so  in  the  fourteenth  and  fifteenth 
the  abuses  which  clung  about  the  Feasts  of  Fools  rendered 
them  everywhere  a  mark  for  the  eloquence  of  ecclesiastical 
reformers.  About  1400  the  famous  theologian  and  rector 
of  Paris  University,  Jean-Charlier  de  Gerson,  put  himself  at 
the  head  of  a  crusade  against  the  ritus  ille  impiissimus  et 
insanus  qui  regnat  per  totam  Franciam,  and  denounced  it 
roundly  in  sermons  and  conclusiones.  The  indecencies  of 
the  feast,  he  declares,  would  shame  a  kitchen  or  a  tavern. 
The  chapters  will  do  nothing  to  stop  them,  and  if  the  bishops 
protest,  they  are  flouted  and  defied.  The  scandal  can  only 
be  ended  by  the  interposition  of  royal  authority  2.     According 


1  Towards  the  end  of  this  period 
the  accounts  are  in  French :  '  le 
pre"centre  de  la  feste  aux  fols.' 

2  Epistola  de  Reformatione  Theo- 
logiae  (Gerson,  Opera  Omnia,  i. 
121),  from  Bruges,  1st  Jan.  1400 
'ex  sacrilegis  paganorum  idolola- 
trarumque  ritibus  reliquiae,'  &c. ; 
Solemnis  oratio  ex  parte  Universi- 
tatis  Paris,  in  praesentia  Regis 
Caroli  Sexti  (1405,  Opera  iv.  620  ; 
cf.  French  version  in  Bibl.  Nat. 
ancf.fr.  7275,  described  P.  Paris, 
Manus.  franc,  de  la  Bibl.  du  Roi, 
vii.  266)  '  hie  commendari  potest 
bona  Regis  fides  et  vestrum  omnium 
Dominorum  variis  modis  religio- 
sorum, ...  in  hoc  quod  iam  dudum 
litteras  dedistis  contra  abominabiles 
maledictiones  et  quasi  idolatrias, 
quae  in  Francorum  fiunt  ecclesiis 
sub  umbra  Festi  fatuorum.  Fatui 
sunt  ipsi,  et  perniciosi  fatui,  nee 
sustinendi,  opus  est  executione'; 
Retnemoratio  quorumdam  quae  per 
Praelatum  quemlibet  pro  parte  sua 
nunc  agenda  viderentur  (1407-8, 
Opera,  ii.  109)  'sciatur  quomodo 
ritus  ille  impiissimus  et  insanus  qui 
regnat  per  totam  Franciam  poterit 
evelli  aut  saltern  temperari.  De 
hoc  scilicet  quod  ecclesiastici  fa- 


ciunt,  vel  in  die  Innocentium,  vel  in 
die  Circumcisionis,vel  in  Epiphania 
Domini,  vel  in  Carnisprivio  per 
Ecclesias  suas,  ubi  fit  irrisio  de- 
testabilis  Servitii  Domini  et  Sacra- 
mentorum  :  ubi  plura  fiunt  impu- 
denter  et  execrabiliter  quam  fieri 
deberent,  in  tabernis  vel  prostibulis, 
vel  apud  Saracenos  et  Iudaeos; 
sciunt  qui  viderunt,  quod  non  suffi- 
citcensura  Ecclesiastica ;  quaeratur 
auxiliumpotestatisRegiaeperedicta 
sua  vehementer  urgentia' ;  Quinque 
conclusiones  super  ludo  stulterum 
communiter  fieri  solito  {Opera  iii. 
309)  '  qui  per  Regnum  Franciae  in 
diversis  fiunt  Ecclesiis  et  Abbatiis 
monachorum  et  monialium  .  .  .  hae 
enim  insolentiae  non  dicerentur 
cocis  in  eorum  culina  absque  dede- 
core  aut  reprehensione,  quae  ibi  fiunt 
in  Ecclesiis  Sacrosanctis,  in  loco 
orationis,  in  praesentia  Sancti  Sacra- 
mentiAltaris,dum  divinum  cantatur 
servitium,  toto  populo  Christiano 
spectante  et  interdum  Iudaeis  .  .  . 
adhuc  peius  est  dicere,  festum  hoc 
adeo  approbatum  esse  sicut  festum 
Conceptionis  Virginis  Mariae,  quod 
paulo  ante  asseruit  quidam  in  urbe 
Altissiodorensi  secundum  quod  dici- 
tur  et  narrari  solet,  &c.' 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  293 

to  Gerson,  Charles  the  Sixth  did  on  one  occasion  issue  letters 
against  the  feast ;  and  the  view  of  the  reformers  found 
support  in  the  diocesan  council  of  Langres  in  1404 l,  and 
the  provincial  council  of  Tours,  held  at  Nantes  in  143 1  2. 
It  was  a  more  serious  matter  when,  some  years  after  Gerson's 
death,  the  great  council  of  Basle  included  a  prohibition  of 
the  feast  in  its  reformatory  decrees  of  1435 3.  By  the 
Pragmatic  Sanction  issued  by  Charles  VII  at  the  national 
council  of  Bourges  in  1438,  these  decrees  became  ecclesi- 
astical law  in  France4,  and  it  was  competent  for  the  Parle- 
ments  to  put  them  into  execution5.  But  the  chapters  were 
obstinate  ;  the  feasts  were  popular,  not  only  with  the  in- 
ferior clergy  themselves,  but  with  the  spectac/e-loving  bour- 
geois of  the  cathedral  towns ;  and  it  was  only  gradually  that 
they  died  out  during  the  course  of  the  next  century  and 
a  half.  The  failure  of  the  Pragmatic  Sanction  to  secure 
immediate  obedience  in  this  matter  roused  the  University  of 
Paris,  still  possessed  with  the  spirit  of  Gerson,  to  fresh  action. 
On  March  12,  1445,  tne  Faculty  of  Theology,  acting  through 
its  dean,  Eustace  de  Mesnil,  addressed  to  the  bishops  and 

1  Council  of  Langres  (1404)  quibusdam  frequentatum  Ecclesiis, 
'  prohibemus  clericis  .  .  .  ne  in-  quo  certis  anni  celebritatibus  non- 
tersint  ...  in  ludis  illis  inhonestis  nullis  cum  mitra,  baculo  ac  vestibus 
quae  solent  fieri  in  aliquibus  Ec-  pontificalibus  more  episcoporum 
clesiis  in  festo  Fatuorum  quod  benedicunt,  alii  ut  reges  ac  duces 
faciunt  in  festivitatibus  Natalis  induti  quod  festum  Fatuorum,  vel 
Domini.'  Innocentum  seu  Puerorum  in  qui- 

2  Council  of  Nantes  (1431),  c.  13  busdam  regionibus  nuncupatur,  alii 
(J.  Maan,  Sancta  et  Metrop.  Eccl.  larvales  et  theatrales  iocos,  alii 
Turonensis,  ii.  101)  '  quia  in  talibus  choreas  et  tripudia  marium  et  mu- 
Ecclesiis  Provinciae  Turonensis  lierum  facientes  homines  ad  specta- 
inolevit  et  servatur  usus,  .  .  .  quod  cula  et  cachinnationes  movent,  alii 
festis  Nativitatis  Domini,  Sancto-  comessationes  et  convivia  ibidem 
rum    Stephani,    Ioannis    et    Inno-  praeparant.' 

centium,  nonnulli  Papam,  nonnulli  4  Council  of  Bourges,  July  7,1438 

Episcopum,  alii  Ducem  vel  Comitem  (Ordonnances  des  Rois  de  France  de 

aut  Principem  in  suis  Ecclesiis  ex  la  Troisihne  Race,  xiii.  287)  '  Item, 

novitiis   praecipuis    faciunt   et   or-  Acceptat  Decretum  de  spectaculis 

dinant  .  .  .  Et  talia  . .  .  vulgari  elo-  in    Ecclesia    non    faciendis,   quod 

quio  festum  stultorum  nuncupatur,  incipit :   Turpem,  &c.' 
quod  de  residuis  Kalendis  Ianuariis  6  F.  Aubert,    Le  Parlement   de 

a  multo  tempore  ortum  fuisse  ere-  Paris,  sa  Competence,  ses  Attribu- 

datur.'  tions,  1314-1422(1890),  182  ;  Hist. 

3  Council  of  Basle, sessioxx.\(]une  du  Parlement  de  Paris,  1250-1515 
9,  1435),  can-  xi  (Mansi,  xxix.  108)  (1894),  i.  163. 

'  Turpem   etiam   ilium  abusum    in 


294  FOLK  DRAMA 

chapters  of  France  a  letter  which,  from  the  minuteness  of 
its  indictment,  is  perhaps  the  most  curious  of  the  many 
curious  documents  concerning  the  feast 1.  It  consists  of  a 
preamble  and  no  less  than  fourteen  conclusiones,  some  of  which 
are  further  complicated  by  qualificationes.  The  preamble 
sets  forth  the  facts  concerning  the  festum  fatuorum.  It  has 
its  clear  origin,  say  the  theologians,  in  the  rites  of  paganism, 
amongst  which  this  Janus-worship  of  the  Kalends  has  alone 
been  allowed  to  survive.  They  then  describe  the  customs  of 
the  feast  in  a  passage  which  I  must  translate : 

1  Priests  and  clerks  may  be  seen  wearing  masks  and  mon- 
strous visages  at  the  hours  of  office.  They  dance  in  the  choir 
dressed  as  women,  panders  or  minstrels.  They  sing  wanton 
songs.  They  eat  black  puddings  at  the  horn  of  the  altar 
while  the  celebrant  is  saying  mass.  They  play  at  dice  there. 
They  cense  with  stinking  smoke  from  the  soles  of  old  shoes. 
They  run  and  leap  through  the  church,  without  a  blush  at 
their  own  shame.  Finally  they  drive  about  the  town  and 
its  theatres  in  shabby  traps  and  carts  ,  and  rouse  the  laughter 
of  their  fellows  and  the  bystanders  in  infamous  performances, 
with  indecent  gestures  and  verses  scurrilous  and  unchaste  V 

There  follows  a  refutation  of  the  argument  that  such  ludi 
are  but  the  relaxation  of  the  bent  bow  in  a  fashion  sanctioned 
by  antiquity.  On  the  contrary,  they  are  due  to  original  sin, 
and  the  snares  of  devils.  The  bishops  are  besought  to  follow 
the  example  of  St.  Paul  and  St.  Augustine,  of  bishops  Martin, 


1  Epistola  et  xiv.  conclusiones  histrionum  choreas  ducere  in  choro, 
facultatis  theologiae  Parisiensis  ad  cantilenas  inhonestas  cantare,  offas 
ecclesiarum  praelatos  contra  festuin  pingues  supra  cornu  altaris  iuxta 
fatuorum   in    Oct  avis    Nativitatis  celebrantem  missam  comedere,  lu- 

Domini    vel   prima    Ianuarii    in  dum    taxillorum    ibidem    exercere, 

quibusdam  Ecclesiis  celebration  (H.  thurificare  de  fumo  fetido  ex  corio 

Denifle,  Chartularium  Univ.  Paris.  veterum   sotularium,  et  per  totam 

iv.  652;  P.  L.  ccvii.  1 169).      The  ecclesiam  currere,  saltare,  turpitu- 

document  is  too  long  and  too  scho-  dinem   suam    non    erubescere,   ac 

lastic  to  quote  in  full.     The  date  is  deinde    per  villam    et    theatra   in 

March  12,  144^.  curribus  et  vehiculis  sordidis  duci 

2  '  Quis,  quaeso,  Christianorum  ad  infamia  spectacula,  pro  risu 
sensatus  non  diceret  malos  illos  astantium  et  concurrentium  turpes 
sacerdotes  et  clericos,  quos  divini  gesticulationes  sui  corporisfaciendo, 
officii  tempore  videret  larvatos,  et  verba  impudicissima  ac  scurrilia 
monstruosis  vultibus,  aut  in  vesti-  proferendo  ? ' 

bus    mulierum,   aut    lenonum,   vel 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  295 

Hilarius,  Chrysostom,  Nicholas  and  Germanus  of  Auxerre, 
all  of  whom  made  war  on  sacrilegious  practices,  not  to  speak 
of  the  canons  of  popes  and  general  councils,  and  to  stamp 
out  the  ludibria.  It  rests  with  them,  for  the  clergy  will  not 
be  so  besotted  as  to  face  the  Inquisition  and  the  secular  arm l. 

The  conclusiones  thus  introduced  yield  a  few  further  data  as 
to  the  ceremonies  of  the  feast.  It  seems  to  be  indifferently 
called  festitm  stultorum  and  fcs turn  fatuorum.  It  takes  place 
in  cathedrals  and  collegiate  churches,  on  Innocents'  day, 
on  St.  Stephen's,  on  the  Circumcision,  or  on  other  dates. 
'Bishops'  or  'archbishops'  of  Fools  are  chosen,  who  wear  mitres 
and  pastoral  staffs,  and  have  crosses  borne  before  them,  as 
if  they  were  on  visitation.  They  take  the  Office,  and  give 
Benedictions  to  the  readers  of  the  lessons  at  Matins,  and  to 
the  congregations.  In  exempt  churches,  subject  only  to  the 
Holy  See,  a  '  pope '  of  Fools  is  naturally  chosen  instead  of 
a  '  bishop  '  or  an  '  archbishop.'  The  clergy  wear  the  garments 
of  the  laity  or  of  fools,  and  the  laity  put  on  priestly  or 
monastic  robes.  Ladi  the atr ales  and  personagiorum  ludi  are 
performed. 

The  manifesto  of  the  Theological  Faculty  helped  in  at  least 
one  town  to  bring  matters  to  a  crisis.  At  Troyes  the  Feast 
of  Fools  appears  to  have  been  celebrated  on  the  Circumcision 
in  the  three  great  collegiate  churches  of  St.  Peter,  St.  Stephen, 
and  St.  Urban,  and  on  Epiphany  in  the  abbey  of  St.  Loup. 
The  earliest  records  are  from  St.  Peter's.  In  1372  the  chapter 
forbade  the  vicars  to  celebrate  the  feast  without  leave.  In 
1380  and  1 38 1  there  are  significant  entries  of  payments  for 
damage  done :  in  the  former  year  Marie-la-Folle  broke  a 
candelabrum ;  in  the  latter  a  cross  had  to  be  repaired  and 
gilded.  In  1436,  the  year  after  the  council  of  Basle,  leave 
was  given  to  hold  the  feast  without  irreverence.  In  1439, 
the  year  after  the  Pragmatic  Sanction,  it  was  forbidden.     In 

1  '  Concludimus,   quod    a   vobis  nexibilem   a  punitione  cum  assis- 

praelatis    pendet    continuatio    vel  tentia  inquisitorum  ndei,  et  auxilio 

abolitio  huius  pestiferi  ritus  ;  nam  brachii  saecularis,  quam  illico  cede- 

ipsos   ecclesiasticos    ita    dementes  rent    aut   frangerentur.     Timerent 

esse  et  obstinatos  in  hac  furia  non  namque  carceres,  timerent  perdere 

est  verisimile,  quod  si  faciem  prae-  benericia,   perdere    famam    et    ab 

lati  reperirent  rigidam  et  nullatenus  altaribus  sacris  repelli.' 


296  FOLK  DRAMA 

1443,  it  was  again  permitted.  But  it  must  be  outside  the 
church.  The  'archbishop'  might  wear  a  rochet,  but  the 
supper  must  take  place  in  the  house  of  one  of  the  canons, 
and  not  at  a  tavern.  The  experiment  was  not  altogether 
a  success,  for  a  canon  had  to  be  fined  twenty  sous  pour  les 
grandes  sottises  et  les  gestes  extravagants  quit  s'e'tait permis 
a  la  fete  des  fols1.  Towards  the  end  of  1444,  when  it  was 
proposed  to  renew  the  feast,  the  bishop  of  Troyes,  Jean 
Leguise,  intervened.  The  clergy  of  St.  Peter's  were  appar- 
ently willing  to  submit,  but  those  of  St.  Stephen's  stood  out. 
They  told  the  bishop  that  they  were  exempt  from  his  juris- 
diction, and  subject  only  to  his  metropolitan,  the  archbishop 
of  Sens ;  and  they  held  an  elaborate  revel  with  even  more 
than  the  usual  insolence  and  riot.  On  the  Sunday  before 
Christmas  they  publicly  consecrated  their  '  archbishop '  in  the 
most  public  place  of  the  town  with  a.jeu  de  personnages  called 
le  jeu  du  sacre  de  leur  arcevesque,  which  was  a  burlesque  of 
the  saint  mis  the  de  consecration  pontificale.  The  feast  itself 
took  place  in  St.  Stephen's  Church.  The  vicar  who  was 
chosen  '  archbishop '  performed  the  service  on  the  eve  and 
day  of  the  Circumcision  in  pontificalibus ,  gave  the  Benediction 
to  the  people,  and  went  in  procession  through  the  town. 
Finally,  on  Sunday,  January  3,  the  clergy  of  all  three  churches 
joined  in  another  jeu  de  personnages,  in  which,  under  the 
names  of  Hypocrisie,  Faintise  and  Faux-semblant,  the  bishop 
and  two  canons  who  had  been  most  active  in  opposing  the 
feast,  were  held  up  to  ridicule.  Jean  Leguise'  was  not  a  man 
to  be  defied  with  impunity.  On  January  23  he  wrote  a  letter 
to  the  archbishop  of  Sens,  Louis  de  Melun,  calling  his 
attention  to  the  fact  that  the  rebellious  clerks  had  claimed 
his  authority  for  their  action.  He  also  lodged  a  complaint 
with  the  king  himself,  and  probably  incited  the  Faculty  of 
Theology  at  Paris  to  back  him  up  with  the  protest  already 
described.     The  upshot   of  it  all  was   a   sharp  letter  from 

1  T.  Boutiot,  Hist,  de  la  Ville  de  left    the    cathedral    and    returned 

Troyes  (1870-80),  ii.  264;    iii.  19.  again,   need    not    serve    a   second 

A  chapter  decree  of  1437  lays  down  time.     It  was  doubtless  an  expen- 

that   a  vicar  who   has    served   as  sive  dignity. 
'  archbishop  '  and  has  subsequently 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


297 


Charles  VII  to  the  bailly  and  provost  of  Troyes,  setting 
forth  what  had  taken  place,  and  requiring  them  to  see  that 
no  repetition  of  the  scandalous  jeux  was  allowed  1.  Shortly 
afterwards  the  chapter  of  St.  Peter's  sent  for  their  Ordinarium, 
and  solemnly  erased  all  that  was  derogatory  to  religion  and 
the  good  name  of  the  clergy  in  the  directions  for  the  feast. 
What  the  chapter  of  St.  Stephen's  did,  we  do  not  know. 
The  canons  mainly  to  blame  had  already  apologized  to  the 
bishop.  Probably  it  was  thought  best  to  say  nothing,  and 
let  it  blow  over.  At  any  rate,  it  is  interesting  to  note  that 
in  1595,  a  century  and  a  half  later,  St.  Stephen's  was  still 
electing  its  archevesque  des  saulx,  and  that  droits  were 
paid  on  account  of  the  vicars'  feast  until  all  droits  tumbled 
in  1 789 2. 

The  proceedings  at  Troyes  seem  to  have  reacted  upon  the 
feast  at  Sens.  In  December,  1444,  the  chapter  had  issued 
an  elaborate  order  for  the  regulation  of  the  ceremony,  in 
which  they  somewhat  pointedly  avoided  any  reference  to 
the  council  of  Basle  or  the  Pragmatic  Sanction,  and  cited  only 
the  legatine  statute  of  Odo  of  Tusculum  in  1345.  The  order 
requires  that  divine  service  shall  be  devoutly  and  decently 
performed,  prout  iacet  in  libro  ipsius  servitii.  By  this  is 
doubtless  meant  the  Officium  already  described.     There  must 


1  Boutiot,  op.  cit.  iii.  20 ;  A.  de 
Jubainville,  Inventaire  sommaire 
des  Archives  departementales  de 
I'Aude,  i.  244  (G.  1275);  P.  de 
Julleville,  Les  Com.  35,  Rdp.  Com. 
330  ;  A.  Vallet  de  Viriville,  in  Bibl. 
de  t'Ecoledes  Chartes,  iii.  448.  The 
letter  of  Jean  Leguise  to  Louis  de 
Melun  is  printed  in  Annates  archeo- 
togzques,  iv.  209  ;  -Revue  des  Soc. 
Savantes  (2nd  series),  vi.  94 ; 
Journal  de  Verdun,  Oct.  1751,  and 
partly  by  Rigollot,  153.  It  is  dated 
only  Jan.  23,  but  clearly  refers  to 
the  events  of  1444-5.  The  Ordon- 
nance  of  Charles  VII  is  in  Martene 
and  Durand,  Thesaurus  Novus 
Anecdotorum,  i.  1804;  H.  Denifle, 
Chartularium  Univ.  Paris,  iv.  657. 
Extracts  are  given  by  Ducange, 
s.  v.  Kalendae.  The  king  speaks 
of  the  Troyes  affair  as  leading  to 


the  Theological  Faculty's  letter.  It 
is  permissible  to  conjecture  that  he 
was  moved,  no  doubt  by  the  ab- 
stract rights  and  wrongs  of  the  case, 
but  also  by  a  rumour  spread  at 
Troyes  that  he  had  revoked  the 
Pragmatic  Sanction.  For,  as  a 
matter  of  fact,  Peter  of  Brescia, 
the  papal  legate,  was  trying  hard 
to  get  him  to  revoke  it. 

a  Boutiot,  op.  cit.  i.  494,  iii.  20. 
The  chapters  of  St.  Stephen's  and 
St.  Urban's  and  the  abbey  of  St. 
Loup  all  continued  to  make  pay- 
ments for  their  feasts  after  1445. 
They  may  have  been  pruned  of 
abuses.  In  the  sixteenth  century 
the  Comte  of  Champagne  pays  five 
sous  to  the  '  archevesque  des  Saulx' 
at  St.  Stephen's,  and  this  appears 
to  be  the  droit  charged  upon  the 
royal  demesne  up  to  1789. 


298 


FOLK  DRAMA 


be  no  mockery  or  impropriety,  no  unclerical  costume,  no 
dissonant  singing.  Then  comes  what,  considering  that  this 
is  a  reform,  appears  a  sufficiently  remarkable  direction.  Not 
more  than  three  buckets  of  water  at  most  must  be  poured 
over  the  precentor  stultortim  at  Vespers.  The  custom  of 
ducking  on  St.  John's  eve,  apparently  the  occasion  when 
the  precentor  was  elected,  is  also  pruned,  and  a  final  clause 
provides  that  if  nobody's  rights  are  infringed  the  stulti  may 
do  what  they  like  outside  the  church  l.  Under  these 
straitened  conditions  the  feast  was  probably  held  in  1445. 
There  was,  however,  the  archbishop  as  well  as  the  chapter  to 
be  reckoned  with.  It  was  difficult  for  Louis  de  Melun,  after 
the  direct  appeal  made  to  him  by  his  suffragan  at  Troyes, 
to  avoid  taking  some  action,  and  in  certain  statutes  promul- 
gated in  November,  1445,  he  required  the  suppression  of  the 
whole  consuetudo  and  ordered  the  directions  for  it  to  be  erased 
from  the  chant-books 2.  There  is  now  no  mention  of  the  feast 
until  1486,  from  which  date  an  occasional   payment  for  la 


1  Cherest,  66,  from  Acta  Capitu- 
laria  (Dec.  4,  1444)  in  Bibl.  Nat. 
Cod.  Paris.  1014  and  1 35 1  '  De 
servitio  dominicae  circumcisionis. 
viso  super  hoc  statuto  per  quem- 
dam  legatum  edito,  et  consideratis 
aliis  circa  hoc  considerandis,  et  ad 
evitandum  scandala,  quae  super 
hoc  possent  exoriri,  ordinatum  fuit 
unanimiter  et  concorditer,  nemine 
discrepante,  quod  de  caetero  dictum 
servitium  fiet,  prout  iacet  in  libro 
ipsius  servitii,  devote  et  cum  reve- 
rentia ;  absque  aliqua  derisione, 
tumultu  aut  turpitudine,  prout  hunt 
alia  servitia  in  aliis  festis,  in  habiti- 
bus  per  dictum  statutum  ordinatis, 
et  non  alias,  et  voce  modulosa, 
absque  dissonantia,  et  assistant  in 
huiusmodi  servitio  omnes  qui  tenen- 
tur  in  eo  interesse,  et  faciant  debitum 
suum  absque  discursu  aut  turba- 
tione  servitii,  potissime  in  ecclesia ; 
nee  proiiciatur  aqua  in  vesperis 
super  praecentorem  stultorum  ultra 
quantitatem  trium  sitularum  ad 
plus ;  nee  adducantur  nudi  in  cra- 
stino  festi  dominicae  nativitatis,  sine 
brachis    verenda    tegentibus,    nee 


etiam  adducantur  in  ecclesia,  sed 
ducantur  ad  puteum  claustri,  non 
hora  servitii  sed  alia,  et  ibi  rigentur 
sola  situla  aquae  sine  lesione.  Qui 
contrarium  fecerit  occurrit  ipso 
facto  suspensionis  censuram  per 
dictum  statutum  latam  ;  attamen 
extra  ecclesiam  permissum  est  quod 
stulti  faciant  alias  ceremonias  sine 
damno  aut  iniuria  cuiusquam.'  The 
proceedings  on  the  day  after  the 
Nativity  are  probably  explained  by 
the  election  of  the  precentor  on 
that  day  (after  Vespers).  The  vic- 
tims ducked  may  have  failed  to  be 
present  at  the  election  ;  but  cf.  the 
Easter  prisio  (ch.  vii). 

2  Saint-Marthe,  Gallia  Chris- 
tiana, xii.  96,  partly  quoted  by  Du- 
cange,  s.  v.  Kalendae.  The  bishop 
describes  the  feast  almost  in  the 
ipsissima  verba  of  the  Paris  Theo- 
logians, but  in  one  passage  ('  nudos 
homines  sine  verendorum  tegmine 
inverecunde  ducendo  per  villam  et 
theatra  in  curribus  et  vehiculis  sor- 
didis,  &c.')  he  adds  a  trait  from 
the  Sens  chapter  act  just  quoted. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


299 


feste  du  premier  jour  de  Fan  begins  to  appear  again  in  the 
chapter  account-books1.  In  i5IJ>  ths  servitium  divinum 
after  the  old  custom  is  back  in  the  church.  But  the  chapter 
draws  a  distinction  between  the  servitium  and  the  festum 
stultorum,  which  is  forbidden.  The  performance  of  jeux  de 
personnages  and  the  public  shaving  of  the  precentor's  beard 
on  a  stage  are  especially  reprobated2.  The  servitium  was 
again  allowed  in  15 14,  151 6,  15 17,  and  in  1520  with  a  pro- 
vision that  the  lucerna  precentoris  fatuorum  must  not  be 
brought  into  the  church  3.  In  1522,  both  servitium  and 
festum  were  forbidden  on  account  of  the  war  with  Spain ;  the 
shaving  of  the  precentor  and  the  ceremony  of  his  election 
on  the  feast  of  St.  John  the  Evangelist  again  coming  in  for 
express  prohibition4.  In  1523  the  servitium  was  allowed 
upon  a  protest  by  the  vicars,  but  only  with  the  strict  exclu- 
sion of  the  popular  elements5.  In  1524  even  the  servitium 
was  withheld,  and  though  sanctioned  again  in  i535>  J539  and 
1543,  it  was  finally  suppressed  in  1547  6.  Some  feast,  however, 
would  still  seem  to  have  been  held,  probably  outside  the 
church,  until  1614 7,  and  even  as  late  as  1634  there  was 
a  trace  of  it  in  the  annual  procession  of  the  Virgin  Mary 
and  the  Apostles,  already  referred  to. 

This  later  history  of  the  feast  at  Sens  is  fairly  typical,  as 
the  following  chapter  will  show,  of  what  took  place  all  over 
France.     The    chapters    by   no    means    showed   themselves 


1  Che'rest,  68.  The  councils  of 
Sens  in  1460  and  1485  (p.  300)  are 
for  the  province.  That  of  1528 
(sometimes  called  of  Sens,  but  pro- 
perly of  Paris)  is  national.  They 
are  not  evidence  for  the  feast  at 
Sens  itself. 

'l  Ibid.  72  '  Insolentias,  tam  de 
die  quam  de  nocte,  faciendo  ton- 
dere  barbam  parte,  ut  fieri  con- 
suevit,  in  theairo  .  .  .  ac  ludere 
personagia,  die  scilicet  circumci- 
sionis  Domini.'  The  shaven  face 
was  characteristic  of  the  mediaeval 
fool,  minstrel,  or  actor  (cf.  ch.  ii). 
Dreves,  586,  adds  that  Tallinus  Bis- 
sart,  the  precentor  of  this  year,  was 
threatened  with  excommunication. 

3  Ibid.  75. 


4  Ibid.  76  '  prohibitum  vicariis 
ne  attentent,  ultima  die  anni,  in 
theatro  tabulato  ante  valvas  eccle- 
siae  aut  alibi  in  civitate  Seno- 
nensi,  publice  barbam  illius  qui  se 
praecentorem  fatuorum  nominat, 
aut  alterius,  radere,  radifacere,  per- 
mittere,  aut  procurare  ;  et  ne  ad 
electionem  dicti  praecentoris  die 
festo  Sancti  Iohannis  Evangelistae 
sub  poenis  excommunicationis. 

5  Ibid.  77  '  honeste,  ac  devote, 
sine  laternis,  sine  precentore,  sine 
delatione  baculi  domini  precen- 
toris, nee  poterunt  facere  rasuram 
in  theatro  ante  ecclesiam.' 

9  Ibid.  78. 
7  Dreves,  586. 


300 


FOLK  DRAMA 


universally  willing  to  submit  to  the  decree  promulgated  in  the 
Pragmatic  Sanction.  In  many  of  them  the  struggle  between 
the  conservative  and  the  reforming  parties  was  spread  over  a 
number  of  years.  Councils,  national,  provincial  and  diocesan, 
continued  to  find  it  necessary  to  condemn  the  feast,  men- 
tioning it  either  by  name  or  in  a  common  category  with 
other  ludi,  spec  taenia,  choreae,  tripudia  and  larvationes1.  In 
one  or  two  instances  the  authority  of  the  Parlements  was 
invoked.  But  in  the  majority  of  cases  the  feast  either 
gradually  disappeared,  or  else  passed,  first  from  the  'churches 
into  the  streets,  and  then  from  the  clerks  to  the  bourgeois, 
often  to  receive  a  new  life  under  quite  altered  circumstances 
at  the  hands  of  some  witty  and  popular  compagnie  des  fous*. 


1  Prov,  C.  of  Rouen  (1445),  c.  ir 
(Labb£,  xiii.  1304)  '  prohibet  haec 
sancta  synodus  ludos  qui  fatuorum 
vulgariter  nuncupantur  cum  larva- 
tis  faciebus  et  alias  inhoneste  fieri 
in  ecclesiis  aut  cemeteriis ' ;  Prov. 
C.  of  Sens  (1485,  repeats  decrees  of 
earlier  council  of  1460),  c.  3  (Labbe-, 
xiii.  1728),  quoting  and  adopting 
Basle  decree,  with  careful  excep- 
tion for  consuetudines  of  Nativity 
and  Resurrection  ;  cf.  ch.  xx  ;  Dioc. 
C.  of  Chartres  (1526,  apparently 
repeated  1550,  tit.  16  ;  cf.  Du  Tilliot, 
62)  quoted  Bochellus,  iv.  7.  46  '  de- 
nique  ab  Ecclesia  eiiciantur  vestes 
fatuorum  personas  scenicas  agen- 
tium ' ;  Nat.  C.  of  Paris  (1528,  held 
by  Abp.  of  Sens  as  primate),  Deer. 
Morum,  c.  16  (Labbe,  xiv.  471) 
'  prohibemus  ne  fiat  deinceps  fe- 
stum  fatuorum  aut  innocentium, 
neque  erigatur  decanatus  patellae.' 
The  Prov.  C.  of  Rheims  (1456,  held 
at  Soissons)  in  Labbe",  xiii.  1397, 
mentions  only  '  larvales  et  theatra- 
les  ioci,'  '  choreae,'  '  tripudia,'  but 


refers  explicitly  to  the  Pragmatic 
Sanction.  This,  it  may  be  observed, 
was  suspended  for  a  while  in  1461 
and  finally  annulled  in  1516.  Still 
more  general  are  the  terms  of  the 
C.  ofOr/eans(i$2$,  repeated  1587  ; 
Du  Tilliot,  61);  C.  of  Narbonne 
(155 1),  c.  46  (Labbe",  xv.  26) ;  C.  of 
Beauvais  (1554;  E.  Fleury,  Cin- 
quante  Ans  de  Laon,  53)  ;  C.  of 
Cambrai  (1565),  vi.  n  (Labbe,  xv. 
160);  C.  of  Rheims  (1583),  c.  5 
(Labbe",  xv.  889) ;  C.  of  Tours  (1583, 
quoted  Bochellus,  iv.  7.  40).  See 
also  the  councils  quoted  as  to  the 
Boy  Bishop,  in  ch.  xv.  Finally,  the 
C.  of  Trent,  although  in  its  22nd 
session  (1562)  it  renewed  the  de- 
crees of  popes  and  councils  '  de 
choreis,  aleis,  lusibus '  {Deer,  de 
Reformatione ,c.  1) ,  made  no  specific 
mention  of  'fatui'  {Can.  et  Deer. 
Sacros.  Oec.  Cone.  Tridentini, 
(Romae,  1845),  127).  Probably  the 
range  of  the  feast  was  by  this  time 
insignificant. 
2  Cf.  ch.  xvi. 


CHAPTER   XIV 

THE   FEAST   OF   FOOLS   {continued) 

The  history  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  has  been  so  imperfectly 
written,  that  it  is  perhaps  worth  while  to  bring  together  the 
records  of  its  occurrence,  elsewhere  than  in  Troyes  and  Sens, 
from  the  fourteenth  century  onwards.  They  could  probably 
be  somewhat  increased  by  an  exhaustive  research  amongst 
French  local  histories,  archives,  and  the  transactions  of  learned 
societies.  Of  the  feast  in  Notre-Dame  at  Paris  nothing  is 
heard  after  the  reformation  carried  out  in  1198  by  Eudes  de 
Sully 1.  The  bourgeois  of  Tournai  were,  indeed,  able  to  quote 
a  Paris  precedent  for  the  feast  of  their  own  city  in  1499  ;  but 
this  may  have  been  merely  the  feast  of  some  minor  collegiate 
body,  such  as  that  founded  in  1303  by  cardinal  Le  Moine2; 
or  of  the  scholars  of  the  University,  or  of  the  compagnie  joyeuse 
of  the  Enfants-sans-Souci.  At  Beauvais,  too,  there  are  only 
the  faintest  traces  of  the  feast  outside  the  actual  twelfth-  and 
thirteenth-century  service-books  3.  But  there  are  several  other 
towns  in  the  provinces  immediately  north  and  east  of  the 
capital,  lie  de  France,  Picardy,  Champagne,  where  it  is 
recorded.  The  provision  made  for  it  in  the  Amiens  Ordi- 
narium  of  1291  has  been  already  quoted.     Shortly  after  this, 


1  But  there  was  another  revel  on 
Aug.  28.  F.  L.  Chartier,  L'ancien 
Chapitre  de  N.-D.  de  Paris,  175, 
quotes  Archives  Nationales,  LL. 
288,  p.  219  '  iniunctum  est  clericis 
matutinalibus,  ne  in  festo  S.  Augu- 
stinifaciant  dissolutionesquasfacere 
assueverant  annis  praeteritis.' 

1  Dulaure,  Hist,  de  Paris,  iii.  81 ; 


Grenier,  370.  A  '  cardinal '  was 
chosen  on  Jan.  13,  and  took  part  in 
the  office. 

3  Grenier,  362.  A  model  account 
form  has  the  heading  '  in  die  Cir- 
cumcisionis,  si  fiatfestum  stultorum.' 
The  '  rubriques  du  luminaire  '  pro- 
vide for  a  distribution  of  wax  to  the 
sub-deacons  and  choir-clerks.' 


302  FOLK  DRAMA 

bishop  William  de  Macon,  who  died  in  1303,  left  his  own 
pontificalia  for  the  use  of  the  {  bishop  of  Fools1.'  When, 
however,  the  feast  reappears  in  the  fifteenth  century  the 
dominus  festi  is  no  longer  a  '  bishop,'  but  a  '  pope.'  In  1438 
there  was  an  endowment  consisting  of  a  share  in  the  profits 
of  some  lead  left  by  one  John  le  Caron,  who  had  himself  been 
'pope2.'  In  1520  the  feast  was  held,  but  no  bells  were  to  be 
jangled3.  It  was  repeated  in  1538.  Later  in  the  year  the 
customary  election  of  the  '  pope '  on  the  anniversary  of  Easter 
was  forbidden,  but  the  canons  afterwards  repented  of  their 
severity4.  In  1540  the  chapter  paid  a  subsidy  towards  the 
amusements  of  the  '  pope  '  and  his  '  cardinals '  on  the  Sunday 
called  brioris  b.  In  1548  the  feast  was  suppressed6.  At 
Noyon  the  vicars  chose  a  '  king  of  Fools '  on  Epiphany  eve. 
The  custom  is  mentioned  in  1366  as  '  le  gieu  des  roys.'  By 
14 1 9  it  was  forbidden,  and  canon  John  de  Gribauval  was 
punished  for  an  attempt  to  renew  it  by  taking  the  sceptre  off 
the  high  altar  at  Compline  on  Epiphany.  In  1497,  1499, 
and  1505  it  was  permitted  again,  with  certain  restrictions. 
The  cavalcade  must  be  over  before  Nones ;  there  must  be  no 

l  Martonne,  49,  giving  no  autho-  choro    ecclesiae    solemne,    absque 

rity-  faciendo    insolentias     aut    aliquas 

Grenier,    361  ;     Dreves,    583  ;  irrisiones,    nee    deferendo    aliquas 

Rigollot,  15,  quoting  Actum  Capit.  campanas    in    dicta    ecclesia,   aut 

Leave  was  given  to  John  Cornet,  alibi,  et  si  dicti  vicarii  facere  volue- 

of  St.  Michael's,  John  de  Nceux  of  rint    aliqua    convivia,    erit    eorum 

St.  Maurice's,  rectors,  and  Everard  sumptibus  et  non  sumptibus  Domi- 

Duirech,  capellanus  of  the  cathe-  norum  canonicorum.' 
dral,    'pridem    electi,    instituti    et  4  Rigollot,  16  'inhibuerunt  capel- 

assumpti     in    papatum     stultorum  lanis  et  vicariis  .  .  .  facere  recrea- 

villae  Ambianensis  .  .  .  quod  dictus  tiones  solitas  in  pascha  annotino, 

Cornet  .  .  .  et  sui  praedecessores  in  etiam   facere   electionem   de  Papa 

ipso  papatu  ordinati  superstites  die  Stultorum.'     Later  in  the  year  the 

circumcisionis  Domini  .  .  .  facerent  '  iocalia   Papae,   videlicet    annulus 

prandium  in  quo  beneficiati  ipsius  aureus,    tassara    (sic)   argentea  et 

villae  convocarentur  .  .  .  ut  inibi  sigillum '  were  put  in  charge  of  the 

eligere  instituere  et  ordinare  vale-  '  canonicus  vicarialis.' 
rent  papam  ac  papatum  relevarent  6  Rigollot,  17  '  licentiam  dederunt 

absque  tamen  praeiudicio  in  aliquo  .  .  .  ludere   die    dominica    proxima 

tangendo   servitium   divinum   .  .  .  brioris.'    Rigollot  and  Leber  think 

faciendum.'     Apparently  the  paro-  that '  brioris '  may  be  for '  burarum,' 

chial  clergy  of  Amiens  joined  with  the  feast  of  '  buras '  or  '  brandons  ' 

the  cathedral  vicars  and  chaplains  on  the  first  Sunday  in  Lent.     Can 

in  the  feast.  it   be  the  same   as   the   'fete  des 

Grenier,  362  ;  Rigollot,  15  <  Ser-  Braies  '  of  Laon  ? 
vitium  divinum  facient  honeste  in  6  Grenier,  414 ;  Rigollot,  17. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  303 

licentious  or  scurrilous  chansons,  no  dance  before  the  great 
doors  ;  the  '  king  '  must  wear  ecclesiastical  dress  in  the  choir. 
In  1520,  however,  he  was  allowed  to  wear  his  crown  more 
antiquo.  The  feast  finally  perished  in  1721,  owing  to  la 
cherte  des  vivres1.  At  Soissons,  the  feast  was  held  on 
January  1,  with  masquing 2.  At  Senlis,  the  dominus  festi 
was  a  'pope.'  In  i4°3  there  was  much  division  of  opinion 
amongst  the  chapter  as  to  the  continuance  of  the  feast, 
and  it  was  finally  decided  that  it  must  take  place  outside 
the  church.  In  1523  it  came  to  an  end.  The  vicars  of 
the  chapter  of  Saint-Rieul  had  in  1501  their  separate  feast 
on  January  1,  with  a  'prelate  of  Fools'  and  jeux  in  the 
churchyard  3.  From  Laon  fuller  records  are  available  4.  A 
'  patriarch  of  Fools  '  was  chosen  with  his  '  consorts  '  on 
Epiphany  eve  after  Prime,  by  the  vicars,  chaplains  and 
choir-clerks.  There  was  a  cavalcade  through  the  city  and 
a  procession  called  the  Rabardiaux,  of  which  the  nature  is 
not  stated  5.  The  chapter  bore  the  expenses  of  the  banquet 
and  the  masks.  The  first  notice  is  about  1280.  In  1307  one 
Pierre  Caput  was  '  patriarch.'  In  1454  the  bishop  upheld 
the  feast  against  the  dean,  but  it  was  decided  that  it  should 
take  place  outside   the  church.      A    similar   regulation   was 


1  L.  Maziere,  Noyon  Religieux  Dreves,  584,  quoting  cathedral 
in  Comptes-Rendus  et  Memoir es  of  Actum  Capit.  of  19  Dec.  1403,  from 
the  Comite"  arch,  et  hist,  de  Noyon  Grenier's  MS.  Picardie,  158.  Five 
(1895),  xi.  92;  Grenier,  370,  413;  canons  said  'quod  papa  fieret  in 
Rigollot,  28,  quoting  Actum  Capit.  ecclesia,  sed  nulla  elevatio,  et  quod, 
of  1497  'cavere  a  cantu  carminum  qui  vellet  venire,  in  habitu  saeculari 
infamium  et  scandalosorum,  nee  honesto  veniret,  et  quod  nulla  dansio 
non  similiter  carminibus  indecoris  ibi  fieret ' ;  but  the  casting-vote  of 
et  impudicis  verbis  in  ultimo  festo  the  dean  was  against  them,  '  sed 
Innocentium  per  eos  fetide  de-  extra  possent  facere  capellani  et 
cantatis ;    et    si    ricarii    cum   rege  alii  quidquid  vellent.' 

vadant  ad  equitatum  solito,  nequa-  *  Grenier,  370 ;  Rigollot,  22  ;  E. 

quam  fiet  chorea  et  tripudia  ante  Fleury,  Cinquante  Ans  de  Laon,  16; 

magnum portale, saltern itaimpudice  C.  Hide,  in  Bull,  de  la  Soc.  aca- 

ut  fieri  solet.'  de'mique  de  Laon  (1863),  xiii.  ill. 

2  Grenier,  365  ;  Rigollot,  29,  quot-  B  Hide,  op.cit.  116,  thinks  that  the 
ing,  I  think,  a  ceremonial  (1350)  of  Patriarch  used  jetons  de  presence, 
the  collegiate  church  of  Saint-  similar  to  those  used  by  the  Boy 
Pierre-au-Parvis.  The  masquers  Bishop  at  Amiens  and  elsewhere 
obtained  permission  from  some  (ch.  xv).  He  figures  some,  but  they 
canons  seated  on  a  theatre  near  the  may  belong  to  the  period  of  the 
house  called  Grosse-  Tete.  confre'rie. 


3  Grenier,    365 ;     Rigollot,     26 ; 


304  FOLK  DRAMA 

made  in  1455,  J456, 1459-  *n  1462  the  servitium  was  allowed, 
and  the  jeu  was  to  be  submitted  to  censorship.  In  1464  and 
1465  mysteries  were  acted  before  the  Rabardiattx.  In  i486 
the  jeu  was  given  before  the  church  of  St.-Martin-au-Parvis. 
In  1490  the  jeux  and  cavalcade  were  forbidden,  and  the 
banquet  only  allowed.  In  1500  a  chaplain,  Jean  Hubreland, 
was  fined  for  not  taking  part  in  the  ceremony.  In  I5i8the 
worse  fate  of  imprisonment  befell  Albert  Gosselin,  another 
chaplain,  who  flung  fire  from  above  the  porch  upon  the 
'patriarch'  and  his  ' consorts.'  By  1521  the  servitium  seems  to 
have  been  conducted  by  the  cure's  of  the  Laon  churches,  and 
the  vicars  and  chaplains  merely  assisted.  The  expense  now 
fell  on  the  cure's,  and  the  chapter  subsidy  was  cut  down.  In 
1522  and  1525  the  perquisites  of  the  'patriarch'  were  still 
further  reduced  by  the  refusal  of  a  donation  from  the  chapter 
as  well  as  of  the  fines  formerly  imposed  on  absentees.  In 
1527  a  protest  of  Laurent  Brayart,  'patriarch,'  demanding 
either  leave  to  celebrate  the  feast  more  antiquo  or  a  dispensa- 
tion from  assisting  at  the  election  of  his  successor,  was 
referred  to  the  ex-' patriarch.'  In  this  same  year  canons, 
vicars,  chaplains  and  habitue's  of  the  cathedral  were  forbidden 
to  appear  at  the  farces  of  the  fete  des  dnes  l.  In  1531  the 
'patriarch'  Theobald  Bucquet,  recovered  the  right  to  play 
comedies  and  jeux  and  to  take  the  absentee  fines ;  but  in 
1 541  Absalon  Bourgeois  was  refused  leave  pour  faire  semblant 
de  dire  la  messe  a  Hesse.  The  feast  was  cut  down  to  the  bare 
election  of  the  'patriarch'  in  1560,  and  seems  to  have  passed 
into  the  hands  of  a  confririe  ;  all  that  was  retained  in  the 
cathedral  being  the  Primes  folles  on  Epiphany  eve,  in  which 
the  laity  occupied  the  high  stalls,  and  all  present  wore  crowns 
of  green  leaves. 

At  Rheims,  a  Feast  of  Fools  in  1490  was  the  occasion  for 
a  satirical  attack  by  the  vicars  and  choir-boys  on  the  fashion 
of  the  hoods  worn  by  the  bourgeoises.  This  led  to  reprisals 
in  the  form  of  some  anti-ecclesiastical  farces  played  on  the 
following  dimanche  des  Brandons  by  the  law  clerks  of  the 

1  MS.  Hist,  of  Dom.  Bugniatre      term '  fete  des  anes '  was  really  used 
(eighteenth  century)  quoted  Fleury,      at  Laou. 
op.  cit.  16.  I  do  not  feel  sure  that  the 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  305 

Rheims  Basoche1.  At  Chalons-sur-Marne  a  detailed  and 
curious  account  is  preserved  of  the  way  in  which  the  Feast 
of  Fools  was  celebrated  in  1570 2.  It  took  place  on 
St.  Stephen's  day.  The  chapter  provided  a  banquet  on 
a  theatre  in  front  of  the  great  porch.  To  this  the  '  bishop 
of  Fools '  was  conducted  in  procession  from  the  maitrise  des 
fous,  with  bells  and  music  upon  a  gaily  trapped  ass.  He  was 
then  vested  in  cope,  mitre,  pectoral  cross,  gloves  and  crozier, 
and  enjoyed  a  banquet  with  the  canons  who  formed  his 
'  household.'  Meanwhile  some  of  the  inferior  clergy  entered 
the  cathedral,  sang  gibberish,  grimaced  and  made  contortions. 
After  the  banquet,  Vespers  were  precipitately  sung,  followed 
by  a  motet3.  Then  came  a  musical  cavalcade  round  the 
cathedral  and  through  the  streets.  A  game  of  la  paume 
took  place  in  the  market ;  then  dancing  and  further  cavalcades. 
Finally  a  band  gathered  before  the  cathedral,  howled  and 
clanged  kettles  and  saucepans,  while  the  bells  were  rung 
and  the  clergy  appeared  in  grotesque  costumes. 

Flanders  also  had  its  Feasts  of  Fools.  That  of  St.  Omer, 
which  existed  in  the  twelfth  century,  lasted  to  the  sixteenth  4. 
An  attempt  was  made  to  stop  it  in  1407,  when  the  chapter 
forbade  any  one  to  take  the  name  of  '  bishop '  or  '  abbot ' 
of  Fools.  But  Seraphin  Cotinet  was  '  bishop '  of  Fools  in 
1431,  and  led  the  gaude  on  St.  Nicholas'  eve6.  The  ' bishop ' 
is  again  mentioned  in  1490,  but  in  1515  the  feast  was  sup- 
pressed by  Francis  de  Melun,  bishop  of  Arras  and  provost  of 
St.  Omer 6.    Some  payments  made  by  the  chapter  of  B^thune 

1  Julleville,  Les  Com.  36  ;    Re"p.  Hist.,  de  la  mime  Soc.  (1887),  62. 
Com.  348.;    L.  Paris,  Remensiana,  5  Deschamps  de  Pas,  op.  cit.  133 
32,    Le     The'dtre    d    Reims,    30  ;  '  solitum  est  fieri  gaude  in  cena  ob 
Coquillart,  CEuvres  (Bibl.  ElzeV.),  i.  reverentiam  ipsius  sancti.' 

cxxxv.     Coquillart  is  said  to  have  6  Ibid.    op.    cit.    107.      Grenier, 

written  verses  for  the  Basoche  on  414,  citing  Sammarthanus,  Gallia 

this  occasion.  Christiana,  x.  15 10,  calls    Francis 

2  Rigollot,  211,  from  A.  Hugo,  de  Melun  'bishop  of  Terouanne.' 
La  France  pitloresque,  ii.  226,  on  An  earlier  reform  of  the  feast  seems 
the  authority  of  a  register  of  1570  implied  by  the  undated  Chapter 
in  the  cathedral  archives.  Statute  in  Ducange,  s.  v.  Episcopus 

3  It  begins  '  Cantemus  ad  hono-  Fatuorum  '  quia  temporibus  retro- 
rem,  gloriam  et  laudem  Sancti  actismultidefectusetplurascandala, 
Stephani.'  deordinationes  et  mala,  occasione 

4  L.  Deschamps  de  Pas,  in  Mdm.  Episcopi  Fatuorum  et  suorum  eve- 
de  la  Soc.  des  Antiq.  de  la  Morinie,  nerint,  statuimus  et  ordinamus  quod 
xx.  104,  107,  133  ;  O.  Bled,  in  Bull,  de  caetero  in  festo  Circumcisionis 

CHAMBERS.     I  Y 


306  FOLK  DRAMA 

in  1445  and  1474  leave  it  doubtful  how  far  the  feast  was 
really  established  in  that  cathedral  1.  At  Lille  the  feast 
was  forbidden  by  the  chapter  statutes  of  1323  and  1328  2. 
But  at  the  end  of  the  fourteenth  century  it  was  in  full  swing, 
lasting  under  its  '  bishop  '  or  '  prelate  '  from  the  vigil  to  the 
octave  of  Epiphany.  Amongst  the  payments  made  by 
the  chapter  on  account  of  it  is  one  to  replace  a  tin  can 
{kanne  stannee)  lost  at  the  banquet.  The  '  bishop  '  was  chosen, 
as  elsewhere,  by  the  inferior  clergy  of  the  cathedral ;  but  he 
also  stood  in  some  relation  to  the  municipality  of  Lille,  and 
superintended  the  miracle  plays  performed  at  the  procession 
of  the  Holy  Sacrament  and  upon  other  occasions.  In  1393 
he  received  a  payment  from  the  duke  of  Burgundy  for  the 
fete  of  the  Trots  Rots.  Municipal  subsidies  were  paid  to  him 
in  the  fifteenth  century ;  he  collected  additional  funds  from 
private  sources  and  offered  prizes,  by  proclamation  soubz 
nostre  seel  de  fatuity  for  pageants  and  histoires  de  la  Sainte 
Escripture ;  was,  in  fact,  a  sort  of  Master  of  the  Revels  for 
Lille.  He  was  active  in  1468,  but  in  1469  the  town  itself 
gave  the  prizes,  in  place  de  Vevesque  des  folz,  qui  a  present 
est  rue"  jus.  The  chapter  accounts  show  that  he  was  re- 
appointed in  1485  hoc  anno,  de  gratia  speciali.  In  1492  and 
1493  tne  chapter  payments  were  not  to  him  but  sociis  domus 
clericorum,  and  from  this  year  onwards  he  appears  neither 
in  the  chapter  accounts  nor  in  those  of  the  municipality 3. 
Nevertheless,  he  did  not  yet  cease  to  exist,  for  a  statute  was 
passed  by  the  chapter  for  his  extinction,  together  with  that  of 
the  Indus,  qucm  Deposuit  vocant,  in  1531  4.     Five  years  before 

Domini  Vicarii  caeterique  chorum  -  E.  Hautcoeur,  Hist,  de  VEglise 

frequentantes  et  eorum  Episcopus  collegiate  de  Saint-Pierre  de  Lille 

sehabeant  honeste.cantandoet  offi-  (1896-9),  ii.  30  ;  Id.  Cartulaire  de 

ciando  sicut   continetur  plenius  in  I'Eglise,    &c.    ii.    630,    651    {Stat. 

Ordinario  Ecclesiae.'  Capit.  of  July  7,   1323,  confirmed 

1  De    la    Fons-Melicocq,    Ceri-  June     23,    1328);    'item    volumus 

monies    dramatiques    et    Anciens  festum  folorum  penitus  anullari.' 

Usages  dans  les  Eglises  dn  Nord  3  Hautcoeur,  Hist.  ii.  215  ;  De  la 

de  la  Fra?ice  (1850),  4.     In  1445  is  Fons-Melicocq,   Archives   hist,    et 

a  payment  to  the  'eveque  des  fous  lilt,  du  Nord  de  France  (3rd  seriesj, 

de   Saint- Aldegonde '  for  a  'jeu';  v.    374  ;      Flammermont,    Album 

in  1474,  one  for  the  chapter's  share  paliographique    du    Nord    de    la 

of  '  le  feste  du  vesque  des  asnes,  France  (1896),  No.  45. 

par  dessus  tout  ce   que  ly    cceurz  4  Ducange,  s.  v.  Deposuit  (Stat. 

paya.'  Capit.  S.  Petri  Jnsul.  July  13,  1531 , 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


307 


this  the  canons  and  vicars  were  still  wearing  masks  and 
playing  comedies  in  public1.  The  history  of  the  feast  at 
Tournai  is  only  known  to  me  through  certain  legal  pro- 
ceedings which  took  place  before  the  Parle ment  of  Paris 
in  1499.  It  appears  that  the  young  bourgeois  of  Tournai 
were  accustomed  to  require  the  vicars  of  Notre-Dame  to 
choose  an  evesque  des  sotz  from  amongst  themselves  on 
Innocents'  day.  In  1489  they  took  one  Matthieu  de  Porta 
and  insulted  him  in  the  church  itself.  The  chapter  brought 
an  action  in  the  local  court  against  the  prevost  ct  jurez  of 
the  town ;  and  in  the  meantime  obtained  provisional  letters 
inhibitory  from  Charles  VIII,  forbidding  the  vicars  to  hold 
the  feast  or  the  bourgeois  to  enforce  it.  All  went  well  for 
some  years,  but  in  1497  the  bourgeois  grumbled  greatly, 
and  in  1498,  with  the  connivance  of  the  municipal  authorities 
themselves,  they  broke  out.  On  the  eve  of  the  Holy  Innocents, 
between  nine  and  ten  o'clock,  Jacques  de  l'Arcq,  mayor  of 
the  Edwardeurs,  and  others  got  into  the  house  of  Messire 
Pasquier  le  Pame,  a  chaplain,  and  dragged  him  half  naked, 
through  snow  and  frost,  to  a  cabaret.  Seven  or  eight  other 
vicars,  one  of  whom  was  found  saying  his  Hours  in  a  church- 
yard, were  similarly  treated,  and  as  none  of  them  would  be 
made  e'vesque  des  sotz  they  were  all  kept  prisoners.  The 
chapter  protested  to  the  provost  et  jurez,  but  in  vain.  On  the 
following  day  the  bourgeois  chose  one  of  the  vicars  evesque, 
baptized  him  by  torchlight  with  three  buckets  of  water  at 
a  fountain,  led  him  about  for  three  days  in  a  surplice,  and 
played   scurrilous   farces.      They  then   dismissed   the   vicar, 


ex  Reg.  k.)  '  Scandala  et  ludibria 
quae  sub  Fatuitatis  praetextu  per 
beneficiatos  et  habituatos  dictae 
nostrae  ecclesiae  a  vigilia  usque  ad 
completas  octavas  Epiphaniae  fieri 
et  exerceri  consueverunt  .  .  .  dein- 
ceps  nullus  nominetur,  assumatur 
et  creetur  praelatus  follorum,  nee 
Indus,  quern  Deposuit  vocant,  in 
dicta  vigilia,  aut  alio  quocumque 
tempore,  ludatur,  exerceatur,  aut 
fiat.'  Probably  to  this  date  belongs 
the  very  similarly  worded  but  un- 
dated memorandum  in  Delobel, 
Collectanea,  f.  76,  which  Hautcceur, 


Hist.  ii.  220,  224,  assigns  to  1490. 
This  adds  '  de  non  .  .  .  faciendo 
officio  .  .  .  per  vicarios  in  octava 
Epiphaniae.'  The  municipal  duties 
of  the  praelatus  fell  to  the  confrJrie 
of  the  Prince  des  Foux,  afterwards 
Prince  d'Amour,  which  held  revels 
in  1547  (Du  Tilliot,  87),  and  still 
later  to  the  'fou  de  la  ville '  who 
led  the  procession  of  the  Holy 
Sacrament,  and  flung  water  at  the 
people  in  the  eighteenth  century 
(Leber,  ix.  265). 
1  Rigollot,  14. 


X  2 


308  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  elected  as  tvesqne  a  clerk  from  the  diocese  of  Cambrai, 
who  defied  the  chapter.  They  drove  Jean  Parisiz,  the  <rw/of 
La  Madeleine,  who  had  displeased  them,  from  his  church 
in  the  midst  of  Vespers,  and  on  Epiphany  day  made  him  too 
a  prisoner.  In  the  following  March  the  chapter  and  Messire 
Jean  Parisiz  brought  a  joint  action  before  the  High  Court 
at  Paris  against  the  delinquents  and  the  municipal  authorities, 
who  had  backed  them  up.  The  case  came  on  for  hearing 
in  November,  when  it  was  pleaded  that  the  custom  of  electing 
an  dvesque  des  sotz  upon  Innocents'  day  was  an  ancient  one. 
The  ceremony  took  place  upon  a  scaffold  near  the  church 
door;  there  werejeux  in  the  streets  for  seven  or  eight  days, 
and  a  final  convict  in  which  the  canons  and  others  of  the  town 
were  satirized.  The  chapter  and  some  of  the  citizens  sent 
bread  and  wine.  The  same  thing  was  done  in  many  dioceses 
of  Picardy,  and  even  in  Paris.  It  was  all  ad  solarium  popidi, 
and  divine  service  was  not  disturbed,  for  nobody  entered  the 
church.  The  vicar  who  had  been  chosen  tvesque  thought  it 
a  great  and  unexpected  honour.  There  would  have  been 
no  trouble  had  not  the  tvesque  when  distributing  hoods  with 
ears  at  the  end  of  the  jeux  unfortunately  included  certain 
persons  who  would  rather  have  been  left  out,  and  who  conse- 
quently stirred  up  the  chapter  to  take  action.  The  court 
adjourned  the  case,  and  ultimately  it  appears  to  have  been 
settled,  for  one  of  the  documents  preserved  is  endorsed  with 
a  note  of  a  concordat  between  the  chapter  and  the  town,  by 
which  the  feast  was  abolished  in  1500 1. 

Of  the  Feast  of  Fools  in  central  France  I  can  say  but 
little.  At  Chartres,  the  Papi-Fol  and  his  cardinals  committed 
many  insolences  during  the  first  four  days  of  the  year,  and 
exacted  droits  from  passers-by.      They  were  suppressed  in 

1  Two  documents  are  preserved,  Hi.  568) ;    cf.  Julleville,  Rip.  com. 

each  giving  a  full  account  of  the  355  ;    Cousin,   Hist,  de   Tournay, 

event :    (a)  summons   of  the    de-  Bk.  iv.  261.    The  Synod  of  Tournai 

linquents    before     the    Parlement,  in  1520  still  found  it  necessary  to 

dated  March  16, 149! (J-  F-  Foppens,  forbid  students  to  appear  in  church 

Supplement  (1748),  to  A.  Miraeus,  'en  habits  de  fous,  en  repre"sentant 

Opera  Diplomat: ca,  iv.  295).     This  des   personnages  de   comddie'  on 

is  endorsed   with    some   notes    of  St.  Nicholas'  day,  Innocents'  day, 

further    proceedings  ;     (b)    official  or  '  la  fete  de  l'eveque '  (E.  Fleury, 

notes  of  the  hearing  on  Nov.  18,  Cinquante  Ans  de  Laon,  54). 
1499  (Bibl.  de  PEcole  des  Chartes, 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


309 


1479  anc*  again  in  1504 1.  At  Tours  a  Ritual  of  the  four- 
teenth century  contains  elaborate  directions  for  the  fcstum 
novi  anni,  quod  non  debet  remanere,  nisi  corpora  sint  hwni. 
This  is  clearly  a  reformed  feast,  of  which  the  chief  features 
are  the  dramatic  procession  of  the  Prophetae,  including 
doubtless  Balaam  on  his  ass,  in  church,  and  a  miracidum 
in  the  cloister 2.  The  '  Boy  Bishop '  gives  the  benediction 
at  Tierce,  and  before  Vespers  there  are  chori  (carols,  I  sup- 
pose) also  in  the  cloisters.  At  Vespers  Deposuit  is  sung 
three  times,  and  the  bacidus  may  be  taken.  If  so,  the 
thesaurarius  is  beaten  with  baculi  by  the  clergy  at  Compline, 
and  the  new  cantor  is  led  home  with  beating  of  baculi  on 
the  walls  a.  At  Bourges,  the  use  of  the  '  Prose  of  the  Ass  ' 
in  Notre-Dame  de  Sales  seems  to  imply  the  existence  of 
the  feast,  but  I  know  no  details 4.  At  Avallon  the  dominus 
festi  seems  to  have  been,  as  at  Laon,  a  'patriarch,'  and  to 
have  officiated  on  Innocents'  day.  A  chapter  statute  regu- 
lated the  proceedings  in  1453,  an(^  another  abolished  them 
in  15105.  At  Auxerre,  full  accounts  of  a  long  chapter 
wrangle  are  preserved  in  the  register6.  It  began  in  1395 
with  an  order  requiring  the  decent  performance  of  the 
servitium,  and  imposing  a  fee  upon  newly  admitted  canons 


1  Rigollot,  19,  157. 

2  Cf.  ch.  xix. 

8  Martene,  iii.  41  '[at  second  Ves- 
pers] Cantor  .  .  .  dicit  ter  Deposuit 
baculum  tenens,  et  si  baculus  capi- 
tur,  Te  Deum  Laudamus  incipietur 
...  [at  Compline]  ascendunt  duo 
clerici  super  formam  thesaurarii  et 
cantant  Haec  est  sancta  dies,  &c. 
et  post  Conserva  Deus,  et  dum 
canitur  verberant  eum  clerici  ba- 
culis,  et  ante  eos  cantores  festi  et 
erupitores  .  .  .  Post  incipit  cantor 
novus  Verbum  caro  factutn  est,  et 
hoc  cantando  ducunt  eum  in  domum 
suam  per  parietes  cum  baculis 
feriendo.  Si  autem  baculus  non 
accipitur,  nihil  de  iis  dicitur,  sed 
vadunt,  et  extinguitur  luminare.' 

4  Cf.  Appendix  L. 

5  Che"rest,  9,  55,  quoting  Acta 
Capit.  (1453)  'item  circa  festum  In- 
nocentium  ordinatum  est  quod  in 


ecclesia  nullae  fient  insolenciae  seu 
derisiones  potissime  tempore  divini 
servitii  et  quod  pulsentur  matutinae 
non  ante  quartam  horam.  Permit- 
timus  tamen  quod  reverenter  et  in 
habitu  ecclesiastico  per  Innocentes 
et  alios  iuvenes  de  sedibus  inferiori- 
bus  dictum  fiat  officium,  saltern 
circa  ea  quae  sine  sacris  ordinibus 
possunt  exerceri  '  ;  (1510)  'item 
turpem  ilium  abusum  festi  fatuorum 
in  nostra  hactenus  ecclesia,  proh 
dolor,  frequentatum  quo  in  celebri- 
tate  sanctorum  Innocentium  quidam 
sub  nomine  patriarchali  divinum 
celebrant  officium,  penitus  detesta- 
mus,  abolemus  et  interdicimus.' 

6  Lebeuf,  Mint,  concernant  f ' His- 
toire  .  .  .  d' Auxerre  (ed.  Challe  et 
Quantin,  1848-55),  ii.  30  ;  iv.  232 
(quoting  Acta  Capit.  partly  ex- 
tracted by  Ducange,  s.v.  Kalcndae) ; 
and  in  Leber,  ix.  358,  375,  385. 


310  FOLK  DRAMA 

towards  the  feast.  In  1396  the  feast  was  not  held,  owing 
to  the  recent  defeat  of  Sigismund  of  Hungary  and  the  count 
of  Nevers  by  Bajazet  and  his  Ottomans  at  Nicopolis  \  In 
1398  the  dean  entered  a  protest  against  a  grant  of  wine 
made  by  the  chapter  to  the  thirsty  revellers.  In  1400  a 
further  order  was  passed  to  check  various  abuses,  the  excessive 
ringing  of  bells,  the  licence  of  the  scrmones  fatni,  the  im- 
pounding of  copes  in  pledge  for  contributions,  the  beating 
of  men  and  women  through  the  streets,  and  all  dcrisioncs 
likely  to  bring  discredit  on  the  church 2.  In  the  following 
January,  the  bishop  of  Auxerre,  Michel  de  Crency,  intervened, 
forbidding  the  fatui  to  form  a  'chapter,'  or  to  appoint 
'  proctors,'  or  clamare  la  fete  aax  fous  after  the  singing  of 
the  Hours  in  the  church.  This  led  to  a  storm.  The  bishop 
brought  an  action  in  the  secular  court,  and  the  chapter 
appealed  to  the  ecclesiastical  court  of  the  Sens  province. 
In  June,  however,  it  was  agreed  as  part  of  a  general  concordat 
between  the  parties,  that  all  these  proceedings  should  be  non 
avenu3.  It  seems,  however,  to  have  been  understood  that 
the  chapter  would  reform  the  feast.  On  December  2,  the 
abbot  of  Pontigny  preached  a  sermon  before  the  chapter 
in  favour  of  the  abolition  of  the  feast,  and  on  the  following 
day  the  dean  came  down  and  warned  the  canons  that  it  was 
the  intention  of  the  University  of  Paris  to  take  action,  even 
if  necessary,  by  calling  in  the  secular  arm  4.     It  was  better  to 

1  '  Cum  domini  nostri  rex  et  alii  preacher  that  the  feast  of  Fools  was 

regales  Franciae  sint  valde  dolorosi,  as  approbatum  as  that  of  the  Con- 

propter  nova  armaturae  factae   in  ception.     To  this  there  seems  to  be 

partibus  Ungariae  contra  Saracenos  a  reference  in  the  account   of  the 

et  inimicos  fidei';  cf.  Bury-Gibbon,  Abbot  of  Pontigny's  sermon  in  the 

vii.  35.  Acta  Capit.  'praedicavit  .  .  .  quod 

2 '  Ordinavit  quod  de  caeteroom-  dictum   festum  non  erat,  nee  un- 

ncs,  qui  de  festo  fatuorum  fuerint,  quam    fuerat   a    Deo   nee  Ecclesia 

non  pulsent  campanam  capituli  sui  approbandum  seu  approbatum.'  Le- 

post  prandium,  dempta  prima  die  beuf,  in  Leber,  ix.  385,  points  out 

in  qua  suum  episcopum  eligent,  et  that  Gerson  was  intimate  with  one 

etiam    quod    in     suis    sermonibus  member   of  the    Auxerre   chapter 

fatuis  non  ponant  seu  dicant  aliqua  This   was   Nicolas   de   Clamengis, 

opprobria    in    vituperium    alicuius  whose  Opera,  151  (ed.  Lydius,  1613), 

personae.'  include  a  treatise  De  novis  celebri- 

3  Lebeuf,  Hist,  a" Auxerre,  ii.  30.  tatibus  non  instituendis,  in  which 

4  1  suppose  the  intended  action  the  suppression  of  feasts  in  his 
took  shape  in  the  Quinque  Conciu-  diocese  by  Michael  of  Auxerre  is 
stones  of  Gerson  (p.  292),  in  which  alluded  to. 

he  quotes  the  dictum  of  an  Auxerre 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  311 

reform  themselves  than  to  be  reformed.  It  was  then  agreed 
to  suppress  the  abuses  of  the  feast,  the  sermons  and  the 
wearing  of  unecclesiastical  garb,  and  to  hold  nothing  but 
a  festum  subdiaconoruvi  on  the  day  of  the  Circumcision. 
Outside  the  church,  however,  the  clergy  might  dance  and 
promenade  [chorizare  .  .  .  et  .  .  .  spatiare)  on  the  place  of 
St.  Stephen's.  These  regulations  were  disregarded,  on  the 
plea  that  they  were  intended  to  apply  only  to  the  year  in 
which  they  were  made.  In  1407  the  chapter  declared  that 
they  were  to  be  permanent,  but  strong  opposition  was  offered 
to  this  decision  by  three  canons,  Jean  Piqueron,  himself 
a  sub-deacon,  Jean  Bonat,  and  Jean  Berthome,  who  maintained 
that  the  concordat  with  the  bishop  was  for  reform,  not  for 
abolition.  The  matter  was  before  the  chapter  for  the  last 
time,  so  far  as  the  extant  documents  go,  in  141 1.  On 
January  2,  the  dean  reported  that  in  spite  of  the  prohibition 
certain  cano?iici  tortrarii1,  chaplains  and  choir-clerks  had 
held  the  feast.  A  committee  of  investigation  was  appointed, 
and  in  December  the  prohibition  was  renewed.  Jean  Pique- 
ron was  once  more  a  protestant,  and  on  this  occasion  obtained 
the  support  of  five  colleagues  2.  It  may  be  added  that  in 
the  sixteenth  century  an  abbas  stultorum  was  still  annually 
elected  on  July  18,  beneath  a  great  elm  at  the  porch  of 
Auxerre  cathedral.  He  was  charged  with  the  maintenance 
of  certain  small  points  of  choir  discipline  3. 

In  Franche  Comte  and  Burgundy,  the  Feast  of  Fools  is 
also  found.  At  Besancon  it  was  celebrated  by  all  the  four 
great  churches.  In  the  cathedrals  of  St.  John  and  St.  Stephen, 
'  cardinals '  were  chosen  on  St.  Stephen's  day  by  the  deacons 

1  These  were  canons  of  inferior  8  CheVest,  76 ;  Julleville,  Les  Com. 
rank  at  Auxerre  (Ducange,  s.  v.  234;  Lebeuf,  in  Leber,  ix.  35S,  373, 
tortarius).  quoting  a  Cry  pour  V abbd  de  Pcg/ise 

2  Canons  J.  Boileaue,  Devisco,  d'Ausserre  et  ses  sttpfiosts,  from  the 
Pavionis,  Viandi  and  H.  Desnoes.  CEuvresoi Rogerde  Collerye(  1536). 
Was  Viandi  the  canon  John  Vivien  This  resembles  the  productions  of 
who,  according  to  Lebeuf,  Hist.  the  confreries  des  fous  (cf.  ch.  xvi) 
d'  Auxerre,  iv.   234,  noted  on   his  and  begins, 

Breviary     (now    Bibl.    Nat.     Cod. 

Colbert.  4227)  that  at  first  Vespers  'Sortez,  sadlez,  venez  de  toutes 

on  the  Circumcision,  Hodie  Christus  parts, 

was  sung  after  each  Psalm,  'quia  Sottes  et  sots  plus  prompts  que 

Festum  Circumcisionis  vocatur   in  hepars. 

diversis  ecclesiis  festum  Fatuorum '  ? 


312  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  sub-deacons,  on  St.  John's  day  by  the  priests,  on  the 
Holy  Innocents'  day  by  the  choir-clerks  and  choir-boys.  In 
the  collegiate  churches  of  St.  Paul  and  St.  Mary  Magdalen, 
'  bishops  '  or  '  abbots '  were  similarly  chosen.  All  these 
domini  festorum  seem  to  have  had  the  generic  title  of  rois 
des  fous,  and  on  the  choir-feast  four  cavalcades  went  about 
the  streets  and  exchanged  railleries  (se  chantaient  pouille)  when 
they  met.  In  1387  the  Statutes  of  cardinal  Thomas  of 
Naples  ordered  that  the  feasts  should  be  held  jointly  in  each 
church  in  turn  ;  and  in  15 18  the  cavalcades  were  suppressed, 
owing  to  a  conflict  upon  the  bridge  which  had  a  fatal  ending. 
Up  to  1 710,  however,  reges  were  still  elected  in  St.  Mary 
Magdalen's  ;  not,  indeed,  those  for  the  three  feasts  of  Christ- 
mas week,  but  a  rex  capellanorum  and  a  rex  canonicorum, 
who  officiated  respectively  on  the  Circumcision  and  on 
Epiphany  *.  At  Autun  the  feast  of  the  bacidus  in  the 
thirteenth  century  has  already  been  recorded.  In  the  fifteenth 
and  sixteenth  centuries  some  interesting  notices  are  available 
in  the  chapter  registers2.  In  141 1  the  feast  required  reforming. 
The  canons  were  ordered  to  attend  in  decent  clothes  as  on 
the  Nativity ;  and  the  custom  of  leading  an  ass  in  procession 
and  singing  a  cantilena  thereon  was  suppressed  3.  In  1412  the 
abolition  of  the  feast  was  decreed  4.  But  in  1484  it  was  sanc- 
tioned again,  and  licence  was  given  to  punish  those  who  failed 
to  put  in  an  appearance  at  the  Hours  by  burning  at  the  well 5. 

1  Dunot  de  Charnage,  Hist,  de  diei,  ut  fuit  solitum  fieri,  nee  dica- 
Besancon,  i.  227  ;  Rigollot,  47  ;  tur  cantilena  quae  dici  solebat  super 
Leber,  ix.  434 ;  x.  40.  dictum    asinum,    et    supra    officio 

2  The  anonymous  author  of  the  quod  fieri  consuetum  est  dicta  die 
Histoire  defEglised'' 'Autun  (1774),  in  Ecclesia  dicti  Domini  postea 
462,  628,  gives  probata  from  the  providebunt.'  Ducange  says  that 
Acta  Capitularia  for  some,  but  not  the  ass  had  a  golden  foot-cloth  of 
all  of  his  statements.  Du  Tilliot,  which  four  of  the  principal  canons 
24  and  possibly  Ducange,  s.  v.  Fe-  held  the  corners.  On  the  cantilena 
stum  Asinorum  appear  also  to  have  cf.  Appendix  L. 

seen  at  least  one  register  kept  by  4  '  Ordinaverunt  quod  festum  fo- 

the    rotarius    which    covered    the  lorum  penitus  cesset.' 

period  141 1  to  1416.  5    '  Concluserunt    ad    requestum 

3  Deliberaverunt  super  festo  folo-  stultorum  quod  hoc  anno  fiat  festum 
.  rum  quod  fieri  consuevit  anno  quo-  folorum  .  .  .  cum  solemnitatibus  in 

libet  in  festo  Circumcisionis  Domini,  dicto  festo  requisitis  in  libris  dicti 

ad    resecandum    superfluitates    et  festi  descriptis  ...  qui  defecerit  in 

derisiones  quae  fieri  consueverunt  matutinis    et    aliis    horis    statutis 

.  .  .  item  quod  amodo  non  adduca-  comburatur  in  fonte.' 
tur  asinus  ad  processionem  dictae 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  313 

This  custom,  however,  was  forbidden  in  1498 1.  Nothing 
more  is  heard  of  the  asinus,  but  it  is  possible  that  he 
figured  in  the  play  of  Herod  which  was  undoubtedly  per- 
formed at  the  feast,  and  which  gave  a  name  to  the  dominus 
festi  2.  Under  the  general  name  of  festa  fatuorum  was  in- 
cluded at  Autun,  besides  the  feast  of  the  Circumcision,  also 
that  of  the  'bishop'  and  'dean'  of  Innocents,  and  a  missa 
fatuorum  was  sung  ex  ore  infantium  from  the  Innocents'  day 
to  Epiphany  3.  In  1499  Jean  Rolin,  abbot  of  St.  Martin's 
and  dean  of  Autun,  led  a  renewed  attack  upon  the  feast. 
He  had  armed  himself  with  a  letter  from  Louis  XI,  and 
induced  the  chapter,  in  virtue  of  the  Basle  decree,  to  suppress 
both  Herod  and  the  'bishop'  of  Innocents4.  In  1514  and 
1515  the  play  of  Herod  was  performed  ;  but  in  151 8,  when 
application  was  made  to  the  chapter  to  sanction  the  election 
of  both  a  '  Herod  '  and  the  '  bishop'  and  '  dean'  of  Innocents, 
they  applied  to  the  king's  official  for  leave,  and  failed  to  get 
it.  Finally  in  1535  the  chapter  recurred  to  the  Basle  decree, 
and  again  forbade  the  feast,  particularly  specifying  under  the 
name  of  Gaigizons  the  obnoxious  ceremony  of  '  ducking.5 ' 
The  feast  held  in  the  ducal,  afterwards  royal  chapel  of  Dijon 
yields  documents  which  are  unique,  because  they  are  in 
French  verse.  The  first  is  a  mandement  of  Philip  the  Good, 
duke  of  Burgundy,  in  1454,  confirming,  on  the  request  of  the 
haut-Bdtonnier,  the  privilege  of  the  fete,  against  those  who 
would  abolish  it.     He  declares 

'  Que  cette  Fete  cdl^bree 
Soit  a  jamais  un  jour  l'annee, 

1  '  In  fine  Matutinarum  nonnulli      received  a  cheese  from  the  chapter, 
larvati  alii  inordinate  vestiti  choreas,  8  Cf.  ch.  xv. 

tripudia  et  saltus  in  eadem  ecclesia  *  '  Regna  Herodis  et  Episcopatus 

faciunt  .  .  .  [aliquos]  ad  fontem  de-  Innocentium,   seu    fatuorum    festa 

ferunt  et  ibi  aqua  intinguntur.'  hactenus  .  .  .  fieri    solita  .  .  .  abo- 

2  Cf.  ch.  xix.  A  representation  of  lentes.' 

the  '  Flight  into  Egypt '  might  well  6  '  Quod  vulgo  dicitur  Les  Gaigi- 

come  into  a  play  of  Herod.     The  zons  . .  .  amplius  neminem  balneare 

Hist,  d' Autun,  462,  says  that,  before  aut  . . .  pignus  aufferre.'     It  is  here 

the  reform  of  141 1,  the  ass  appeared  only  the   choice  of  'bishop'   and 

as  Balaam's  ass  in  connexion  with  '  dean '  of  Innocents,  '  quod  festum 

a  Prophetae  on  a  stage  at  the  church  fatuorum  a  nonnullis  nuncupatur' 

door.     There  was  a  procession  to  that     is     forbidden.       Apparently 

church,  and  the  Prose.     The  rex  '  Herod '  had  died  out. 


314  FOLK  DRAMA 

Le  premier  du  mois  de  Janvier  ; 
Et  que  joyeux  Fous  sans  dangier, 
De  l'habit  de  notre  Chapelle, 
Fassent  la  Fete  bonne  et  belle, 
Sans  outrage  ni  derision.' 

In  1477  Louis  XI  seized  Burgundy,  and  in  1482  his 
representatives,  Jean  d'Amboise,  bishop  and  duke  of  Langres, 
lieutenant  of  the  duchy,  and  Baudricourt  the  governor,  ac- 
corded to  Guy  Baroset 

c  Protonotaire  et  Procureur  des  Foux,' 

a  fresh  confirmation  for  the  privilege  of  the  feast  held  by 

'  Le  Batonnier  et  tous  ses  vrais  suppots1.' 

There  was  a  second  feast  in  Dijon  at  the  church  of  St. 
Stephen.  In  1494  it  was  the  custom  here,  as  at  Sens,  to 
shave  the  'precentor'  of  Fools  upon  a  stage  before  the  church. 
In  1 62 1  the  vicars  still  paraded  the  streets  with  music  and 
lanterns  in  honour  of  their  'precentor2.'  In  1552,  however, 
the  Feasts  of  Fools  throughout  Burgundy  had  been  pro- 
hibited by  an  arret  of  the  Par  lenient  of  Dijon.  This  was 
immediately  provoked  by  the  desire  of  the  chapter  of  St. 
Vincent's  at  Chalons-sur-Saone  to  end  the  scandal  of  the 
feast  under  their  jurisdiction.  It  was,  however,  general  in  its 
terms,  and  probably  put  an  end  to  the  Chapelle  feast  at  Dijon, 
since  to  about  this  period  may  be  traced  the  origin  of  the 
famous  compagnie  of  the  Mhe-Folle  in  that  city  3. 

In  Dauphine  there  was  a  rex  et  festum  fatuorum  at 
St.  Apollinaire's  in  Valence,  but  I  cannot  give  the  date4. 
At  Vienne  the  Statutes  of  St.  Maurice,  passed  in  13H5,  forbid 
the  abbas  stultorum  sen  sociorum,  but  apparently  allow  rots 

1  Du  Tilliot,  100;  Petit  de  Julie-  et  de  toutes  autres  Eglises  de  son 
ville,  Les  Coin.  194.  Amongst  Du  Ressort,  et  dor^snavant  le  jour  de 
Tilliot's  woodcuts  is  one  of  a  baton  la  Fete  des  Innocens,  et  autres 
(No.  4)  bearing  this  date  1482.  It  jours  faire  aucunes  insolences  et 
represents  a  nest  of  fools.  tumultes    esdites  Eglises,  vacquer 

2  Ibid.  21.  en  icelles,  et  courir  parmi  les  villes 

3  Ibid.  74  '  Icelle  cour  a  or-  avec  danses  et  habits  indecens  a 
donne"    et    ordonne,    que    defenses  leur  e"tat  eccle'siastique.' 

seront  faites  aux  Choriaux  et  habi-  *  Pilot  de  Thorey,  i.  177. 

tues  de  ladite  Eglise  Saint-Vincent 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  315 

on  the  Circumcision  and  Epiphany,  as  well  as  in  the  three 
post-Nativity  feasts.  They  also  forbid  certain  ludibria.  No 
pasquinades  are  to  be  recited,  and  no  one  is  to  be  carried  in 
Rost  or  to  have  his  property  put  in  pawn l.  More  can  be 
said  of  the  feast  at  Viviers.  A  Ceremonial  of  1365  contains 
minute  directions  for  its  conduct2,  On  December  17  the 
sciafardi  et  clericidi  chose  an  abbas  stultus  to  be  re- 
sponsible, as  at  Auxerre,  for  the  decorum  of  the  choir 
throughout  the  year.  He  was  shouldered  and  borne  to  a 
place  of  honour  at  a  drinking-bout.  Here  even  the  bishop, 
if  present,  must  do  him  honour.  After  the  drinking,  the 
company  divided  into  two  parts,  one  composed  of  inferior 
clergy,  the  other  of  dignitaries,  and  sang  a  doggerel  song,  each 
endeavouring  to  sing  its  rival  down.  They  shouted,  hissed, 
howled,  cackled,  jeered  and  gesticulated  ;  and  the  victors 
mocked  and  flouted  the  vanquished.  Then  the  door-keeper 
made  a  proclamation  on  behalf  of  the  '  abbot,'  calling  on 
all  to  follow  him,  on  pain  of  having  their  breeches  slit,  and 
the  whole  crew  rushed  violently  out  of  the  church.  A  pro- 
gress through  the  town  followed,  which  was  repeated  daily 
until    Christmas   eve3.      On  the   three   post-Nativity  feasts, 

1  Pilot  de  Thorey,  i.  178  (Statu/a,  priests,  and  choir  in  the  high  stalls 

c.  40)   '  Item  statuimus  et  ordina-  was   continued  by  these  Statutes, 

mus,  quod  ex  nunc  cessent  abusus  but  suppressed  about  167c. 

qui  fieri  consueverunt  per  abbatem  2  Lancelot,  in  Hist,  de  rAcadcmie 

vulgariter  vocatum    stultorum    seu  des  Inscriptio?is  (ed.  4to),  vii.  255, 

sociorum  .  .  .     Item   statuimus   et  (ed.  i2mo),  iv.  397;  Ducange,  s.  v. 

ordinamus,  cum  in  ecclesia  Dei  non  Kalendae ;  Du  Tilliot,  46. 

deceat  fieri  ludibria  vel  inhonesta  3  '.  .  .  Te  Dewn,  et  tunc  per  con- 

committi,  quod,  in  festis  Sanctorum  socios   subtollitur,   et   elevatur,   ac 

Stephani,     Iohannis     evangelistae,  super  humeros  ad  domum,ubicaeteri 

Innocentium    et    Epiphaniae,    do-  pro  potu  sunt  congregati,  laetanter 

mino  de  cetero  officiatur  et   des-  deportatur,  atque   in  loco  ad    hoc 

serviatur  in  divinis,  prout  in  aliis  specialiter    ornato    et    praeparato 

diebus  infra  fieri  statuetur,  et  quod  ponitur,  statuitur  et  collocatur.    Ad 

nullus,    de    cetero,   ut    quandoque  eius  introitum  omnes  debent  assur- 

factum   fuisse  audivimus,  portetur  gere,  etiam  dominus  Episcopus,  si 

in  Rost,  et  quod,  de  nulla  persona  fuerit  praesens,  ac  impensa   reve- 

ecclesiastica  vel  seculari  cuiuscum-  rentia  consueta  per  consodales   et 

que    status    existat,    inhonesti    vel  consocios  electo,  fructus  species  et 

diffamatorii    rithmi    recitentur,    et  vinum  cum  credentia  ei  dentur,  &c. 

quod    nullus    pignoret    aut    aliena  Sumpto  autem  potu  idem  Abbas  vel 

rapiat    quovisimodo.'      A    Vienne  maior    succentor    ex    eius    officio 

writer,  in  Leber,  ix.  259,  adds  that  absente  Abbate  incipit  cantando  ea 

the  performance  of  the  office  on  the  quae  secuntur  ;  ab  ista  enim  parte 

three  post-Nativityfeastsbydeacons,  sciafardi,     clericuli     ceterique     de 


316 


FOLK  DRAMA 


a  distinct  dominus  festi,  the  episcopus  stultus,  apparently 
elected  the  previous  year,  took  the  place  of  the  abbas.  On 
each  of  these  days  he  presided  at  Matins,  Mass,  and  Vespers, 
sat  in  full  pontificals  on  the  bishop's  throne,  attended  by  his 
'  chaplain,'  and  gave  the  Benedictions.  Both  on  St.  Stephen's 
and  St.  John's  days  these  were  followed  by  the  recitation 
of  a  burlesque  formula  of  indulgence l.  The  whole  festivity 
seems  to  have  concluded  on  Innocents'  day  with  the  election 
of  a  new  episcopus,  who,  after  the  shouldering  and  the 
drinking-bout,  took  his  stand  at  a  window  of  the  great  hall 
of  the  bishop's  palace,  and  blessed  the  people  of  the  city2. 
The  episcopus  was  bound  to  give  a  supper  to  his  fellows. 
In  1406  one  William  Raynoard  attempted  to  evade  this 
obligation.  An  action  was  brought  against  him  in  the  court 
of  the  bishop's  official,  by  the  then  abbas  and  his  predecessor. 


suptus  chorum  debent  esse  simul- 
que  canere,  ceteri  vero  desuper 
chorum  ab  alia  parte  simul  debent 
respondere  .  .  .  Sed  dum  eorum 
cantus  saepius  et  frequentius  per 
partes  continuando  cantatu  tanto 
amplius  ascendendo  elevatur  in 
tantum  quod  una  pars  cantando, 
clamando,  efort  cridar,  vincit  aliam. 
Tunc  enim  inter  se  ad  invicem 
clamando,  sibilando,  ululando,  ca- 
chinnando,  deridendo  ac  cum  mani- 
bus  demonstrando,  pars  victrix 
quantum  potest  partem  adversam 
deridere  conatur  ac  superare,  ioco- 
sasque  trufas  sine  taedio  breviter 
inferre. 

A  parte  Abbatis.     Heros. 

Alter  chorus.    Et  nolic.  nolierno. 

A  parte  Abbatis.  Ad  fons  sancti 
bacon. 

Alii.  Kyrie  Eleison. 

Quo  finito  illico  gachia  ex  eius 
officio  facit  praeconizationem  sic 
dicendo  :  De  par  Mossenhor  Labat 
2  sos  Cosselliers  vos  /am  assaber 
que  tot  horns  lo  sequa,  lay  on  -uoura 
anar,  ea  quo  sus  la  pena  de  talhar 
lo  braye.  Tunc  Abbas  aliique 
domum  exeunt  impetum  facientes. 
Iuniores  canonici  chorarii  scutiferi- 
que  domini  Episcopi  et  canonico- 
rum  Abbatem  comitantur  per  urbem, 
cui  transeunti  salutem  omnes  im- 


pertiunt.  In  istis  vero  visitationi- 
bus  (quae  usque  ad  vigiliam  Natalis 
Domini  quotidie  vespere  hunt) 
Abbas  debet  semper  deportare  ha- 
bitum,  sive  fuerit  manta,  sive  tabar- 
dum,  sive  cappa  una  cum  capputio 
de  variis  folrato.'  It  is  curious  how 
the  characteristic  meridional  love 
of  sheer  noise  and  of  gesture 
comes  out. 

1  De  indulgentiis  dandis  : 
[St.  Stephen's  Day] 

De  par  Mossenhor  l'Evesque, 
Que  Dieus  vos  donne  gran  mal 

al  bescle, 
Avec  una  plena  balasta  de  pardos 
E  dos  das  de  raycha  de  sot  lo 

mento. 
[St.  John's  Day] 

Mossenhor  ques  ayssi  presenz 
Vos  dona   xx  balastas  de  mal 

de  dens, 
Et  a  vos  autras  donas  atressi 
Dona  ia  coa  de  rossi. 

2  '  Deinde  electus  per  sclafardos 
subtollitur  et  campanilla  precedente 
portatur  ad  domum  episcopalem,  ad 
cuius  adventum  ianuae  domus,  ab- 
sente  vel  praesente  ipso  domino 
Episcopo,  debent  totaliter  aperiri, 
ac  in  una  de  fenestris  magni  tinelli 
debet  deponi,et  stans  dat  ibi  iterum 
benedictionem  versus  villam.' 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  317 

It  was  referred  to  the  arbitration  of  three  canons,  who  decided 
that  Raynoard  must  give  the  supper  on  St.  Bartholomew's 
next,  August  24,  at  the  accustomed  place  (a  tavern,  one  fears) 
in  the  little  village  of  Gras,  near  Viviers l. 

Finally,  there  are  examples  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  in 
Provence.  At  Aries  it  was  held  in  the  church  of  St.  Trophime, 
and  is  said  to  have  been  presented,  out  of  its  due  season, 
it  may  be  supposed,  for  the  amusement  of  the  Emperor 
Charles  IV  at  his  coronation  in  1365,  to  have  scandalized 
him  and  so  to  have  met  its  end2.  Nevertheless  in  the 
fifteenth  century  an  'archbishop  of  Innocents,'  alias  stultus, 
still  sang  the  '  O '  on  St.  Thomas's  day,  officiated  on  the  days 
of  St.  John  and  the  Innocents,  and  on  St.  Trophime's  day 
(Dec.  29)  paid  a  visit  to  the  abadesse  fole  of  the  convent 
of  Saint-Cesaire.  The  real  abbess  of  this  convent  was  bound 
to  provide  chicken,  bread  and  wine  for  his  regaling3.  At 
Frejus  in  1558  an  attempt  to  put  down  the  feast  led  to 
a  riot.  The  bishop,  L^on  des  Ursins,  was  threatened  with 
murder,  and  had  to  hide  while  his  palace  was  stormed4. 
At  Aix  the  chapter  of  St.  Saviour's  chose  on  St.  Thomas's 
day,  an  episcopus  fatnus  vel  Innocentium  from  the  choir-boys. 
He  officiated  on  Innocents'  day,  and  boys  and  canons 
exchanged  stalls.  The  custom  lasted  until  at  least  1585  5. 
Antibes,  as  late  as  1645,  affords  a  rare  example  of  the  feast 
held  by  a  religious  house.  It  was  on  Innocents'  day  in  the 
church  of  the  Franciscans.  The  choir  and  office  were  left 
to  the  lay-brothers,  the  queteurs,  cooks  and  gardeners.  These 
put  on  the  vestments  inside  out,  held  the  books  upside  down, 
and  wore  spectacles  with  rounds  of  orange  peel  instead  of 
glasses.  They  blew  the  ashes  from  the  censers  upon  each 
other's  faces  and  heads,  and  instead  of  the  proper  liturgy 
chanted    confused   and    inarticulate    gibberish.     All    this    is 

1  Ducange,  s.v.  Kalendae\    Be"-  6  Rigollot,  171  ;  Fauris  de  Saint- 
renger-Feraud,  iv.  14.  Vincent,    in     Magasin    encydopi- 

2  Papon,  Hist,  de  Provence  (1784),  digue  (1814),  i.  24.     A  chapter in- 
iv.  212.  ventory  mentions  a  'mitra  episcopi 

s  Rigollot,  125.  fatuorum.'     The  Council  of  Aix  in 

4  BeVenger-Feraud,  iv.  131,  quot-  1585  (Labb£,  xv.  1146)  ordered  the 

ing  Mireur,  Bull.  hist,  et philos.  du  suppression  of  Mudibria  omnia  et 

Comitd  des   Travaux  hist.  (1885),  pueriles  ac  theatrales  lusus'  on  In- 

N03.  3,  4.  nocents'  day. 


318 


FOLK  DRAMA 


recorded  by  the  contemporary  free-thinker  Mathurin  de  Neure 
in  a  letter  to  his  leader  and  inspirer,  Gassendi  K 

It  will  be  noticed  that  the  range  of  the  Feast  of  Fools 
in  France,  so  far  as  I  have  come  across  it,  seems  markedly 
to  exclude  the  west  and  south-west  of  the  country.  I  have 
not  been  able  to  verify  an  alleged  exception  at  Bordeaux a. 
Possibly  there  is  some  ethnographical  reason  for  this.  But 
on  the  whole,  I  am  inclined  to  think  that  it  is  an  accident, 
and  that  a  more  complete  investigation  would  disclose  a 
sufficiency  of  examples  in  this  area.  Outside  France,  the 
Feast  of  Fools  is  of  much  less  importance.  The  Spanish 
disciplinary  councils  appear  to  make  no  specific  mention  of  it, 
although  they  know  the  cognate  feast  of  the  Boy  Bishop,  and 
more  than  once  prohibit  ludi,  choreae,  and  so  forth,  in  general 
terms 3.  In  Germany,  again,  I  do  not  know  of  a  case  in 
which  the  term  '  Fools '  is  used.  But  the  feast  itself  occurs 
sporadically.  As  early  as  the  twelfth  century,  Herrad  von 
Landsberg,  abbess  of  Hohenburg,  complained  that  miracle- 
plays,  such  as  that  of  the  Magi,  instituted  on  Epiphany  and 
its  octave  by  the  Fathers  of  the  Church,  had  given  place  to 


1  Thiers,  Traite"  des  Jeux  et  des 
Divertissements ,449;  Du  Tilliot,  33, 
39,  quoting  [Mathurin  de  Neure] 
Querela  ad  Gassendum,  de  parum 
Christianis  Provincialium  suorutn 
ritibus  .  .  .  S^c.  (1645)  '  Choro 
cedunt  omnes  Therapeutae  Sacer- 
dotes,  et  ipse  Archimandrita ;  in 
quorum  omnium  locos  sufficiuntur 
Coenobii  mediastini  viles,  quorum 
aliis  manticae  explendae  cura  est, 
aliis  culina,  aliis  hortus  colendus  : 
Fratres  Laicos  vocant,  qui  tunc  oc- 
cupatis  hinc  et  inde  Initiatorum  ac 
Mystarum  sedibus,  .  .  .  Sacerdota- 
libus  nempe  induuntur  vestibus, 
sed  laceris,  si  quae  suppetant,  ac 
praepostere  aptatis,  inversisque  ; 
inversos  etiam  tenent  libros  in  qui- 
bus  se  fingunt  legere,  appensis  ad 
nasum  perspicillis,  quibus  detrac- 
tum  vitrum,eiusque  loco  mali  aurati 
putamen  insertum  .  .  .  Thuricremi 
Sanniones  in  cuiusque  faciem  cineres 
exsufflarunt,  et  favillas  ex  acerris, 
quas  perludibrium  temere  iactantes, 


stolidis  quandoque  capitibus  afifun- 
dunt  ;  sic  autem  instructi  non 
hymnos,  non  Psalmos,  non  liturgias 
de  more  concinunt,  sed  confusa  ac 
inarticula  verba  demurmurant,  in- 
sanasque  prorsus  vociferationes  de- 
rudunt.'  The  same  M.  de  Neurd 
(whose  real  name  was  Laurent 
Mesme)  says  more  generally  that 
in  many  towns  of  the  province  on 
Innocents'  day,  '  Stolidorum  se  Di- 
vorum  celebrare  festa  putant,  qui- 
bus stolide  litandum  sit,  nee  aliis 
quam  stolidis  illius  diei  sacra  cere- 
moniis  peragenda.'  He  quotes  (p. 
72)  from  a  Rituale  a  direction  for 
the  singing  of  the  Magnificat  to 
the  tune  '  Que  ne  vous  requinquez- 
vous,  vielle  ?  Que  ne  vous  requin- 
quez-vous  done  ? ' 

2  B^renger-Feraud,  iv.  17. 

3  C.  of  Toledo,  N°.  38,  in  1582 
(Aguirre,  Coll.  Cone.  Hisfi.  vi.  12)  ; 
C.  of  Oriolana,  in  1600  (Aguirre, 
vi.  452) :  cf.  pp.  162,  350. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


319 


licence,  buffoonery  and  quarrelling.  The  priests  came  into 
the  churches  dressed  as  knights,  to  drink  and  play  in  the 
company  of  courtesans1.  A  Mosburg  Gradual  of  1360  con- 
tains a  series  of  cantiones  compiled  and  partly  written  by 
the  dean  John  von  Perchausen  for  use  when  the  scholarium 
episcopus  was  chosen  at  the  Nativity2.  Some  of  these, 
however,  are  shown  by  their  headings  or  by  internal  evidence 
to  belong  rather  to  a  New  Year's  day  feast,  than  to  one  on 
Innocents'  day  3.  A  festum  baculi  is  mentioned  and  an  epi- 
scopus or  pracsul  who  is  chosen  and  enthroned.  One  carol 
has  the  following  refrain  4  : 

'  gaudeamus  et  psallamus 
novo  praesuli 
ad  honorem  et  decorem 
sumpti  baculi.' 


1  Pearson,  ii.  285  ;  C.  M.  Engel- 
hardt,  H.  von  Landsberg  (1818), 
104 ;  C.  Schmidt,  H.  von  Lands- 
berg, 40.  Herrad  was  abbess  of 
Hohenburg,  near  Strasburg,  1167- 
95.  The  MS.  of  her  Hortus 
Deliciarum  was  destroyed  at  Stras- 
burg in  1870,  but  Engelhardt,  and 
from  him  Pearson,  translated  the 
bit  about  the  Epiphany  feasts  :  cf. 
ch.  xx. 

2  Dreves,  Anal.  Hymn.  xx.  22 
(from  the  Gradual,  Cod.  Monacens. 
1 57,  f.  23ivo);  after  quoting  a  decree 
against  cantiones  of  the  C.  of  Lyons 
in  1274;  '  ne  igitur  propter  schola- 
rium episcopum,  cum  quo  in  multis 
ecclesiis  a  iuniore  clero  ad  specialem 
laudem  et  devotionem  natalis  Do- 
mini solet  tripudiari,  saecularia  par- 
liamenta  nee  non  strepitus  clamorque 
et  cachitus  mundanarum  cantionum 
in  nostro  choro  invalescant  .  .  .  ego 
Iohannes,  cognomine  de  Perchau- 
sen, Decanus  ecclesiae  Mosburgen- 
sis,  antequam  in  decanum  essem 
assumptus  .  .  .  infra  scriptas  can- 
tiones, olim  ab  antiquis  etiam  in 
maioribus  ecclesiis  cum  scholarium 
episcopo  decantatas,  paucis  mo- 
dernis,  etiam  aliquibus  propriis, 
quas  olim,  cum  rector  fuissem  scho- 
larium, pro  laude  nativitatis  Do- 
mini et  beatae  Virginis  composui, 


adiunctis,  coepi  in  unum  colligere 
et  praesenti  libro  adnectere  pro 
speciali  reverentia  infantiae  Salva- 
toris,  ut  sibi  tempore  suae  nativita- 
tis his  cantionibus  a  novellis  cleri- 
culis  quasi  ex  ore  infantium  et 
lactentium  laus  et  hymnizans  de- 
votio  postposita  vulgarium  lascivia 
possit  tam  decenter  quam  reveren- 
ter  exhiberi.' 

3  The  following  may  all  be 
for  Jan.  I,  and  I  do  not  think 
that  there  was  a  scholarium  epi- 
scopus on  any  other  day  at  Mos- 
burg :  Gregis  pastor  Tityrus 
(Dreves,  op.  cit.  no),  Ecce  novus 
annus  est  (Dreves,  131,  headed  in 
MS.  'ad  novum  annum'),   Nostri 

festi gaudium  (Dreves,  131,  'in  cir- 
cumcisione  Domini '),  Castis  psal- 
lamus mentibus  (Dreves,  135,  251, 
'cum    episcopus     eligitur'),     Mos 

fiorentis  venus talis  (Dreves,  135 
'dum  itur  extra  ecclesiam  ad  cho- 
ream'),  Anni  novi  novitas  (Dreves, 
136  '  cum  infulatus  et  vestitus  prae- 
sul  inthronizatur').  Some  other 
New  Year  cantiones  found  else- 
where by  Dreves  (pp.  130,  131) 
have  no  special  reference  to  the 
feast. 

4  Dreves,  op.  cit.  136  (beginning 
anni  novi  novitas),  250,  with 
musical  notation. 


320  FOLK  DRAMA 

Another  is  so  interesting,  for  its  classical  turn,  and  for  the 
names  which  it  gives  to  the  '  bishop '  and  his  crew  that  I  quote 
it  in  full  \ 

1.  Gregis  pastor  Tityrus, 
asinorum  dominus, 
noster  est  episcopus. 

R°.  eia,  eia,  eia, 

vocant  nos  ad  gaudia 
Tityri  cibaria. 

2.  ad  honorem  Tityri, 
festum  colant  baculi 
satrapae  et  asini. 

R°.  eia,  eia,  eia, 

vocant  nos  ad  gaudiaj 
Tityri  cibaria. 

3.  applaudamus  Tityro 
cum  melodis  organo, 
cum  chordis  et  tympano. 

4.  veneremur  Tityrum, 

qui  nos  propter  baculum 
invitat  ad  epulum. 

The  reforms  of  the  council  of  Basle  were  adopted  for 
Germany  by  the  Emperor  Albrecht  II  in  the  Instrumentum 
Acceptationis  of  Mainz  in  1439.  In  1536  the  council  of 
Cologne,  quoting  the  decretal  of  Innocent  III,  condemned 
theatrales  ludi  in  churches.  A  Cologne  Ritual  preserves  an 
account  of  the  sub-deacons'  feast  upon  the  octave  of  Epi- 
phany2. The  sub-deacons  were  hederaceo  serto  coronati. 
Tapers  were  lit,  and  a  rex  chosen,  who  acted  as  hebdomarius 
from  first  to  second  Vespers.  Carols  were  sung,  as  at  Mosburg3. 
John  Huss,  early  in  the  fifteenth  century,  describes  the  Feast 
of  Fools  as  it  existed  in  far-off  Bohemia4.     The  revellers, 

1  Dreves,  op.  cit:  no,  254,  with  the  Ritual  is  not  given,  but  the 
notation.  ceremony  had  disappeared  by  1645. 

2  Wetzer  und  Welte,  Kirchen-  s  'Admiscent  autem  natalitias 
lexicon,  s.  v.  Epiphany,  quoting  cantiones,  non  sine  gestientis  animi 
Crombach,   Hist.    Trium    Regum  voluptate.' 

(1654),   752 ;    Galenius,  de  admir.  4  Tractatus  de  precatione  Dei, 

Coloniae  (1645),  661.    The  date  of      i.  302  (t  1406-15),  in  F.  Palacky, 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


321 


of  whom,  to  his  remorse,  Huss  had  himself  been  one  as  a 
lad,  wore  masks.  A  clerk,  grotesquely  vested,  was  dubbed 
'  bishop,'  set  on  an  ass  with  his  face  to  the  tail,  and  led  to 
mass  in  the  church.  He  was  regaled  on  a  platter  of  broth 
and  a  bowl  of  beer,  and  Huss  recalls  the  unseemly  revel 
which  took  place 1.  Torches  were  borne  instead  of  candles, 
and  the  clergy  turned  their  garments  inside  out,  and  danced. 
These  ludi  had  been  forbidden  by  one  archbishop  John  of 
holy  memory. 

It  would  be  surprising,  in  view  of  the  close  political  and 
ecclesiastical  relations  between  mediaeval  France  and  England, 
if  the  Feast  of  Fools  had  not  found  its  way  across  the  channel. 
It  did  ;  but  apparently  it  never  became  so  inveterate  as 
successfully  to  resist  the  disciplinary  zeal  of  reforming  bishops, 
and  the  few  notices  of  it  are  all  previous  to  the  end  of  the 
fourteenth  century.  It  seems  to  have  lasted  longest  at 
Lincoln,  and  at  Beverley.  Of  Lincoln,  it  will  be  remembered, 
Pierre  de  Corbeil,  the  probable  compiler  of  the  Sens  Officium, 
was  at  one  time  coadjutor  bishop.  Robert  Grosseteste,  whose 
attack  upon  the  Inductio  Mail  and  other  village  festivals 
served  as  a  starting-point  for  this  discussion,  was  no  less 
intolerant  of  the  Feast  of  Fools.     In  1236  he  forbade  it  to 


Documenta  Mag.  Ioannis  Hus 
vitam  illustrantia  (1869),  722 : 
1  Quantam  autem  quamque  mani- 
festam  licentiam  in  ecclesia  com- 
mittant,  larvas  induentes  —  sicut 
ipse  quoque  adolescens  proh  dolor 
larva  fui — quis  Pragae  describat  ? 
Namque  clericum  monstrosis  vesti- 
bus  indutum  facientes  episcopum, 
imponunt  asinae,  facie  ad  caudam 
conversa,  in  ecclesiam  eum  ad  mis- 
sam  ducunt,  praeferentes  lancem 
iusculi  et  cantharum  vel  amphoram 
cerevisiae  ;  atque  dum  haec  prae- 
tendunt,  ille  cibum  potionemque  in 
ecclesia  capit.  Vidi  quoque  eum 
aras  suffientem  et  pedem  sursum 
tollentem  audivique  magna  voce 
clamantem  :  bii  !  Clerici  autem 
magnas  faces  cereorum  loco  ei 
praeferebant,  singulas  aras  obeunti 
et  sufpenti.  Deinde  vidi  clericos 
cucullos  pellicios  aversa  parte  in- 
duentes et  in  ecclesia  tripudiantes. 


Spectatores  autem  rident  atque  haec 
omnia  religiosa  et  iusta  esse  putant ; 
opinantur  enim,  hos  esse  in  eorum 
rubricis,  id  est  institutis.  Prae- 
clarum  vero  institutum :  pravitas, 
foeditas ! — Atque  quum  tenera  aetate 
et  mente  essem,  ipse  quoque  talium 
nugarumsociuseram;  sedutprimum 
dei  auxilio  adiutus  sacras  literas 
intelligere  coepi,  statim  hanc  ru- 
bricam,  id  est  institutum  huius  in- 
saniae,  ex  stultitia  mea  delevi.  Ac 
sanctae  memoriae  dominus  Ioannes 
archiepiscopus,  is  quidem  excom- 
municationis  poena  proposita  hanc 
licentiam  ludosque  fieri  vetuit,  idque 
summo  iure,  &c.' 

1  The  quotation  given  above  is 
a  translation  by  J.  Kvicala  from  the 
Bohemian  of  Huss.  There  seems 
to  be  a  confusion  between  the 
'  bishop '  and  his  steed.  It  was 
probably  the  latter  who  lifted  up 
his  leg  and  cried  bii. 


CHAMBERS      I 


322 


FOLK  DRAMA 


be  held  either  in  the  cathedral  or  elsewhere  in  the  diocese1; 
and  two  years  later  he  included  the  prohibition  in  his  formal 
Constitutions'1.  But  after  another  century  and  a  half,  when 
William  Courtney,  archbishop  of  Canterbury,  made  a  visitation 
of  Lincoln  in  1390,  he  found  that  the  vicars  were  still  in  the 
habit  of  disturbing  divine  service  on  January  1,  in  the  name 
of  the  feast 3.  Probably  his  strict  mandate  put  a  stop  to  the 
custom 4.  At  almost  precisely  the  same  date  the  Feast  of 
Fools  was  forbidden  by  the  statutes  of  Beverley  minster, 
although  the  sub-deacons  and  other  inferior  clergy  were  still 
to  receive  a  special  commons  on  the  day  of  the  Circumcision5. 
Outside  Lincoln  and  Beverley,  the  feast  is  only  known  in 
England  by  the  mention  of  paraphernalia  for  it  in  thirteenth- 


1  Grosseteste,  Epistolae  (ed. 
Luard,  R.  S.),  118  '  vobis  manda- 
mus in  virtute  obedientiae  firmiter 
iniungentes,  quatenus  festum  stul- 
torum  cum  sit  vanitate  plenum  et 
voluptatibus  spurcum,  Deo  odibile 
et  daemonibus  amabile,  ne  de  cae- 
tero  in  ecclesia  Lincolniensi  die 
venerandae  circumcisionis  Domini 
nullatenus  permittatis  fieri.' 

2  Ibid.  op.  cit.  161  'execra- 
bilem  etiam  consuetudinem,  quae 
consuevit  in  quibusdam  ecclesiis  ob- 
servari  de  faciendo  festo  stultorum, 
speciali  authoritate  rescripti  aposto- 
lici  penitus  inhibemus  ;  ne  de  domo 
orationis  fiat  domus  ludibrii,  et  acer- 
bitas  circumcisionis  Domini  Iesu 
Christi  iocis  et  voluptatibus  subsan- 
netur.'  The  'rescript'  will  be  Inno- 
cent Ill's  decretal  of  1207,  just 
republished  in  Gregory  IX's  De- 
cretales  of  1234  ;  cf.  p.  279. 

3  Lincoln  Statutes,  ii.  247  'quia 
in  eadem  visitacione  nostra  coram 
nobis  a  nonnullis  fide  dignis  de- 
latum  extitit  quod  vicarii  et  clerici 
ipsius  ecclesiae  in  die  Circum- 
cisionis Domini  induti  veste  laicali 
per  eorum  strepitus  truffas  garula- 
ciones  et  ludos,  quos  festa  stultorum 
communiter  et  convenienter  appel- 
lant, divinum  officium  multipliciter 
et  consuete  impediunt,  tenore  pre- 
sencium  Inhibemus  ne  ipsi  vicarii 
qui  nunc  sunt,  vel  erunt  pro  tem- 
pore,  talibus   uti   de  caetero    non 


praesumant  nee  idem  vicarii  seu 
quivis  alii  ecclesiae  ministri  pub- 
licas  potaciones  aut  insolencias  alias 
in  ecclesia,  quae  domus  oracionis 
existit,  contra  honestatem  eiusdem 
faciant  quouismodo.'  Mr.  Leach, 
in  Furnivall  Miscellany,  222,  notes 
'  a  sarcastic  vicar  has  written  in 
the  margin, "  Harrow  barrow.  Here 
goes  the  Feast  of  Fools  (hie 
subducitur festum  stultorum)."  ' 

4  What  was  ly  ffolcfeste  of  which 
Canon  John  Marchall  complained 
in  Bishop  Alnwick's  visitation  of 
1437  that  he  was  called  upon  to 
bear  the  expense  ?  Cf.  Lincoln 
Statutes,  ii.  388  '  item  dicit  quod 
subtrahuntur  ab  ipso  expensae  per 
eum  factae  pascendo  ly  ffolcfeste 
in  ultimo  Natali,  quod  non  erat  in 
propria,  nee  in  cursu,  sed  tamen 
rogatus  fecit  cum  promisso  sibi 
facto  de  effusione  expensarum  et 
non  est  sibi  satisfactum.' 

5  Statutes  of  Thos.  abp.  of  York 
(1391)  in  Monasticon,  vi.  1310  '  in 
die  etiam  Circumcisionis  Domini 
subdiaconis  et  clericis  de  secunda 
forma  de  victualibus  annis  singulis, 
secundum  morem  et  consuetudinem 
ecclesiae  ab  antiquo  usitatos,  debite 
ministrabit  [praepositus],  antiqua 
consuetudine  immo  verius  cor- 
rupted regis  stultorum  infra  ec- 
clesiam  et  extra  hactenus  usitata 
sublata  penitus  et  extirpata.' 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  323 

century  inventories  of  St.  Paul's  \  and  Salisbury  2,  and  by  a 
doubtful  allusion  in  a  sophisticated  version  of  the  St.  George 
play  3. 

A  brief  summary  of  the  data  concerning  the  Feast  of  Fools 
presented  in  this  and  the  preceding  chapter  is  inevitable.  It 
may  be  combined  with  some  indication  of  the  relation  in 
which  the  feast  stands  with  regard  to  the  other  feasts  dealt 
with  in  the  present  volume.  If  we  look  back  to  Belethus  in 
the  twelfth  century  we  find  him  speaking  of  the  Feast  of 
Fools  as  held  on  the  Circumcision,  on  Epiphany  or  on  the 
octave  of  Epiphany,  and  as  being  specifically  a  feast  of  sub- 
deacons.  Later  records  bear  out  on  the  whole  the  first  of 
these  statements.  As  a  rule  the  feast  focussed  on  the  Cir- 
cumcision, although  the  rejoicings  were  often  prolonged,  and 
the  election  of  the  domhms  festi  in  some  instances  gave  rise 
to  a  minor  celebration  on  an  earlier  day.  Occasionally 
(Noyon,  Laon)  the  Epiphany,  once  at  least  (Cologne)  the 
octave  of  the  Epiphany,  takes  the  place  of  the  Circumcision. 
But  we  also  find  the  term  Feast  of  Fools  extended  to  cover 
one  or  more  of  three  feasts,  distinguished  from  it  by  Belethus, 
which  immediately  follow  Christmas.  Sometimes  it  includes 
them  all  three  (Besancon,  Viviers,  Vienne),  sometimes  the 
feast  of  the  Innocents  alone  (Autun,  Avallon,  Aix,  Antibes, 
Aries),  once  .the  feast  of  St.  Stephen  (Chalons-sur-Marne)  4. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  definition  of  the  feast  as  a  sub-deacons' 
feast  is  not  fully  applicable  to  its  later  developments.  Traces 
of  a  connexion  with  the  sub-deacons  appear  more  than  once 
(Amiens,  Sens,  Auxerre,  Beverley)  ;  but  as  a  rule  the  feast 
is  held  by  the  inferior  clergy  known  as  vicars,  chaplains,  and 
choir-clerks,  all  of  whom  are  grouped  at  Viviers  and  Romans 
under  the  general  term  of  esclaffardi.  At  Laon  a  part  is 
taken  in  it  by  the  cure's  of  the  various  parishes  in  the  city. 

1  Inventory  of  St.  Paul's  (1245)  w-  H.  R.  Jones,  Vetus  Registr. 
in  Archaeologia,  1.  472,  480  '  Ba-  Sarisb.  (R.  S.),  ii.  135  '  Item  baculi 
cuius  stultorum  est  de  ebore  et  sine  ii  ad  "  Festum  Folorum." ' 
cambuca,  cum  pomello  de  ebore  3  N°.  27  in  the  list  given  for  ch. 
subtus  indentatus  ebore  et  cornu :  x.  Father  Christmas  says  '  Here 
.  .  .  capa  et  mantella  puerorum  ad  comes  in  "  The  Feast  of  Fools."  ' 
festum  Innocentum  et  Stultorum  4  Cf.  the  further  account  of  these 
sunt  xxviij  debiles  et  contritae.'  post-Nativity  feasts  in  ch.  xv. 

2  Sarum   Inventory  of  1222    in 

Y  2 


324  FOLK  DRAMA 

The  explanation  is,  I  think,  fairly  obvious.  Originally,  per- 
haps, the  sub-deacons  held  the  feast,  just  as  the  deacons, 
priests,  and  boys  held  theirs  in  Christmas  week.  But  it  had 
its  vogue  mainly  in  the  great  cathedrals  served  by  secular 
canons1,  and  in  these  the  distinction  between  the  canons  in 
different  orders — for  a  sub-deacon  might  be  a  full  canon2 — 
was  of  less  importance  than  the  difference  between  the  canons 
as  a  whole  and  the  minor  clergy  who  made  up  the  rest  of 
the  cathedral  body,  the  hired  choir-clerks,  the  vicars  choral 
who,  originally  at  least,  supplied  the  place  in  the  choir  of 
absent  canons,  and  the  chaplains  who  served  the  chantries 
or  small  foundations  attached  to  the  cathedral  3.  The  status 
of  spiritual  dignity  gave  way  to  the  status  of  material  pre- 
ferment. And  so,  as  the  vicars  gradually  coalesced  into 
a  corporation  of  their  own,  the  Feast  of  Fools  passed  into 
their  hands,  and  became  a  celebration  of  the  annual  election 
of  the  head  of  their  body 4.  The  vicars  and  their  associates 
were  probably  an  ill-educated  and  an  ill-paid  class.  Certainly 
they  were  difficult  to  discipline 5  ;  and  it  is  not  surprising 
that  their  rare  holiday,  of  which  the  expenses  were  met 
partly  by  the  chapter,  partly  by  dues  levied  upon  themselves 
or  upon  the  bystanders  6,  was  an  occasion  for  popular  rather 

1  The  C.  of  Paris  in  121 2  (p.  279)  were  often  at  the  same  time  capel- 
forbids  the  Feast  of  Fools  in  re-  lani  or  chantry-priests.  On  chan- 
ligious  houses.  But  that  in  the  tries  see  Cutts,  438. 
Franciscan  convent  at  Antibes  is  *  The  Lincoln  vicars  chose  two 
the  only  actual  instance  I  have  Provosts  yearly  (Maddison,  op.  cit.); 
come  across.  the   Wells    vicars    two    Principals 

2  There  were  canonici  presbiteri,  (Reynolds,  op.  cit.  clxxi). 
diaconi,  subdiaconi  and  even  pueri  5  Reynolds,  op.  cit.,  gives  nume- 
at  Salisbury  (VV.  H.  Frere,  Use  of  rous    and    interesting    notices    of 
Sarum,  i.  51).  chapter  discipline  from  the  Wells 

3  On  the  nature  and  growth  of  Liber  Ruber. 

vicars  choral,  cf.  Cutts,  341 ;  W.  H.  6  In  Leber,  ix.  379, 407,  is  described 

Frere,  Use  of  Sarum,  i.xvn;  Lincoln  a  curious  way  of  raising  funds  for 

Statutes,  passim  ;  A.  R.  Maddison,  choir  suppers,  known   at   Auxerre 

Vicars  Choral  of  Lincoln  (1878) ;  and   in   Auvergne,   and    not   quite 

H.  E.  Reynolds,  Wells  Cathedral,  extinct  in  the  eighteenth  century, 

xxix,     cvii,    clxx.      Vicars    choral  It   has    a   certain   analogy   to    the 

make     their     appearance     in     the  Deposuit.    From  Christmas  to  Epi- 

eleventh    century    as    choir    sub-  phany   the    Psalm    Memento    was 

stitutes    for    non-resident    canons.  sung  at  Vespers,  and  the  anthem 

At   Lincoln  they  got  benefactions  De  fructu   ventris  inserted  in   it. 

from  about   1190,  and  in  the  thir-  When  this  began  the  ruler  of  the 

teenth  century  formed  a  regularly  choir    advanced  and   presented   a 

organized  communitas.  The  vicarii  bouquet  to  some  canon  or  bourgeois 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  325 

than  refined  merry-making  l.  That  it  should  perpetuate  or 
absorb  folk-customs  was  also,  considering  the  peasant  or 
small  bourgeois  extraction  of  such  men,  quite  natural. 

The  simple  psychology  of  the  last  two  sentences  really 
gives  the  key  to  the  nature  of  the  feast.  It  was  largely  an 
ebullition  of  the  natural  lout  beneath  the  cassock.  The 
vicars  hooted  and  sang  improper  ditties,  and  played  dice 
upon  the  altar,  in  a  reaction  from  the  wonted  restraints  of 
choir  discipline.  Familiarity  breeds  contempt,  and  it  was 
almost  an  obvious  sport  to  burlesque  the  sacred  and  tedious 
ceremonies  with  which  they  were  only  too  painfully  familiar. 
Indeed,  the  reverend  founders  and  reformers  of  the  feast  had 
given  a  lead  to  this  apishness  by  the  introduction  of  the 
symbolical  transference  of  the  bacillus  at  the  Deposuit  in  the 
Magnificat.  The  ruling  idea  of  the  feast  is  the  inversion  of 
status,  and  the  performance,  inevitably  burlesque,  by  the 
inferior  clergy  of  functions  properly  belonging  to  their  betters. 
The  fools  jangle  the  bells  (Paris,  Amiens,  Auxerre),  they 
take  the  higher  stalls  (Paris),  sing  dissonantly  (Sens),  repeat 
meaningless  words  (Chalons,  Antibes),  say  the  mcsse  Hesse 
(Laon)  or  the  missa  fatuorum  (Autun),  preach  the  scrmones 
fatui  (Auxerre),  cense  pracpostcre  (St.  Omer)  with  pudding 
and  sausage  (Beauvais)  or  with  old  shoes  (Paris  theologians). 
They  have  their  chapter  and  their  proctors  (Auxerre,  Dijon). 
They  install  their  dominus  festi  with  a  ceremony  of  sacre 
(Troyes),  or  shaving  (Sens,  Dijon).  He  is  vested  in  full 
pontificals,  goes  in  procession,  as  at  the  Rabardiaux  of  Laon, 
gives  the  benedictions,  issues  indulgences  (Viviers),  has  his 
seal  (Lille),  perhaps  his  right  of  coining  (Laon).      Much  in 

as  a  sign  that  the  choir  would  sup  totius  cleri  et  fiunt  et  cantantur.' 
with  him.  This  was  called  '  annonce  '  When,  however,  Ducange  says 

en     forme     d'antienne,'    and     the  that  the  feast  was  not  called  Subdia- 

suppers  def rutins.    The  C.  of  Nar-  conorum,  because  the  sub-deacons 

^««,?(i55i),c.47,forbade'parochis  held  it,  but  rather  as  being  '  ebrio- 

.  .  .  ne  .  .  .  ad  commessationes  quas  rum  Clericorum  seu   Diaconorum: 

defructus  appellant,  ullo  modo  paro-  id  enim  evincit  vox  Soudiacres,  id 

chianos   suos   admittant,  nee  per-  est,   ad   litteram,    Saturi  Diaconi, 

mittantquempiamcanereutdicunt:  quasi    Diacres    Saou/s,'    we    must 

Memento,    Domine,    David    sans  take  it  for  a  *  sole  joke  of  Thucy- 

trnffe,    &c.    Nee    alia     huiusmodi  dides.'      1   believe  there  is  also   a 

ridenda,  quae  in  contemptum  divini  joke    somewhere     in    Liddell   and 

officii   ac  in   dedecus  et   probrum  iicott. 


326  FOLK  DRAMA 

all  these  proceedings  was  doubtless  the  merest  horseplay  ; 
such  ingenuity  and  humour  as  they  required  may  have  been 
provided  by  the  wicked  wit  of  the  goliardi1. 

Now  I  would  point  out  that  this  inversion  of  status  so 
characteristic  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  is  equally  characteristic 
of  folk-festivals.  What  is  Dr.  Frazer's  mock  king  but  one 
of  the  meanest  of  the  people  chosen  out  to  represent  the  real 
king  as  the  priest  victim  of  a  divine  sacrifice,  and  surrounded, 
for  the  period  of  the  feast,  in  a  naive  attempt  to  outwit 
heaven,  with  all  the  paraphernalia  and  luxury  of  kingship  ? 
Precisely  such  a  mock  king  is  the  dominus  festi  with  whom 
we  have  to  do.  His  actual  titles,  indeed,  are  generally 
ecclesiastical.  Most  often  he  is  a  '  bishop,'  or  '  prelate ' 
(Senlis) ;  in  metropolitan  churches  an  '  archbishop,'  in  churches 
exempt  from  other  authority  than  that  of  the  Holy  See,  a 
'  pope '  (Amiens,  Senlis,  Chartres).  More  rarely  he  is  a 
'patriarch'  (Laon,  Avallon),  a  'cardinal'  (Paris,  Besancon), 
an  '  abbot '  (Vienne,  Viviers,  Romans,  Auxerre) 2,  or  is  even 
content  with  the  humbler  dignity  of  '  precentor,'  '  baadarius ' 
or  '  batonnier '  (Sens,  Dijon).  At  Autun  he  is,  quite  ex- 
ceptionally, '  Herod.'  Nevertheless  the  term  '  king '  is  not 
unknown.  It  is  found  at  Noyon,  at  Vienne,  at  Besancon, 
at  Beverley,  and  the  council  of  Basle  testifies  to  its  use,  as 
well  as  that  of  '  duke.'  Nor  is  it,  after  all,  of  much  im- 
portance what  the  dominus  festi  is  called.  The  point  is  that 
his  existence  and  functions  in  the  ecclesiastical  festivals 
afford  precise  parallels  to  his  existence  and  functions  in 
folk-festivals  all  Europe  over. 

Besides  the  '  king  '  many  other  features  of  the  folk-festivals 
may  readily  be  traced  at  the  Feast  of  Fools.  Some  here, 
some  there,  they  jot  up  in  the  records.  There  are  dance 
and  chanson,  tripndium  and   cantilena  (Noyon,  Chalons-sur- 

1  Cf.  p.  60 ;  Gautier,  Les  Tro-  been  sometimes  charged  with  choir 
paires,  i.  186;  and  C.  of  Treves  in  discipline  throughout  the  year,  and 
1227  (J.  F.  Schannat,  Cone.  Germ.  at  Vienne  and  Viviers  exists  side 
iii.  532)  '  praecipimus  ut  omnes  by  side  with  another  dominus  festi. 
Sacerdotes  non  permittant  trutan-  Similarly  at  St.  Omer  there  was 
nos  et  alios  vagos  scolares  aut  a  '  dean '  as  well  as  a  '  bishop.' 
goliardos  cantare  versus  super  The  vicars  of  Lincoln  and  Wells 
Sanctus  et  Agnus  Dei.'  also  chose  two  officers. 

2  The  '  abbot '  appears  to  have 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  327 

Marne,  Paris  theologians,  council  of  Basle).  There  is  eating 
and  drinking,  not  merely  in  the  refectory,  but  within  or 
at  the  doors  of  the  church  itself  (Paris  theologians,  Beau- 
vais,  Prague).  There  is  ball-playing  (Chalons-sur-Marne). 
There  is  the  procession  or  cavalcade  through  the  streets 
(Laon,  Chalons-sur-Marne,  &c).  There  are  torches  and 
lanterns  (Sens,  Tournai).  Men  are  led  nudi  (Sens);  they 
are  whipped  (Tours)  ;  they  are  ceremonially  ducked  or 
roasted  (Sens,  Tournai,  Vienne,  les  Gaigizons  at  Autun) 1. 
A  comparison  with  earlier  chapters  of  the  present  volume 
will  establish  the  significance  which  these  points,  taken  in 
bulk,  possess.  Equally  characteristic  of  folk-festivals  is  the 
costume  considered  proper  to  the  feasts.  The  riotous  clergy 
wear  their  vestments  inside  out  (Antibes),  or  exchange  dress 
with  the  laity  (Lincoln,  Paris  theologians).  But  they  also 
wear  leaves  or  flowers  (Sens,  Laon,  Cologne)  and  women's 
dress  (Paris  theologians) ;  and  above  all  they  wear  hideous 
and  monstrous  masks,  larvae  or  personac  (decretal  of  1207, 
Paris  theologians,  council  of  Basle,  Paris,  Soissons,  Laon, 
Lille).  These  masks,  indeed,  are  perhaps  the  one  feature  of 
the  feast  which  called  down  the  most  unqualified  condemna- 
tion from  the  ecclesiastical  authorities.  We  shall  not  be  far 
wrong  if  we  assume  them  to  have  been  beast-masks,  and  to 
have  taken  the  place  of  the  actual  skins  and  heads  of  sacri- 
ficial animals,  here,  as  so  often,  worn  at  the  feast  by  the 
worshippers. 

An  attempt  has  been  made  to  find  an  oriental  origin  for 
the  Feast  of  Fools2.  Gibbon  relates  the  insults  offered  to 
the  church  at  Constantinople  by  the  Emperor  Michael  III, 
the  'Drunkard'  (842-67) 3.  A  noisy  crew  of  courtiers 
dressed  themselves  in  the  sacred  vestments.  One  Theo- 
philus  or  Grylus,  captain  of  the  guard,  a  mime  and  buffoon, 
was  chosen  as  a  mock  '  patriarch.'     The  rest  were  his  twelve 

1  I  suppose  that  'portetur  in  iv.p.4<)B(C0r/>.Iftst.B_yz.x.i.2.io2); 
rost'  at  Vienne  means  that  the  Paphlagon  (Migne,  P.  G.  cv.  527); 
victims  were  roasted  like  the  fags  Theophanes  Continuatus,  iv.  38 
in  Tom  Brown.  (Corp.  Hist,  Byz.xxn. 200) ;  Symeon 

2  Ducange,  s.  v.  Kalendae.  Magister,  p.  437  D  (Corp.  Hist.  Byz. 

3  Gibbon  -  Bury,  v.  201.  The  xxii.  661),  on  all  of  whom  see  Bury, 
Byzantine  authorities  are  Genesius,  App.  I  to  torn.  cit. 


328  FOLK  DRAMA 

'  metropolitans,'  Michael  himself  being  entitled  '  metropolitan 
of  Cologne.'  The  '  divine  mysteries '  were  burlesqued  with 
vinegar  and  mustard  in  a  golden  cup  set  with  gems.  Theo- 
philus  rode  about  the  streets  of  the  city  on  a  white  ass,  and 
when  he  met  the  real  patriarch  Ignatius,  exposed  him  to 
the  mockery  of  the  revellers.  After  the  death  of  Michael, 
this  profanity  was  solemnly  anathematized  by  the  council 
of  Constantinople  held  under  his  successor  Basil  in  869 l. 
Theophilus,  though  he  borrowed  the  vestments  for  his 
mummery,  seems  to  have  carried  it  on  in  the  streets  and 
the  palace,  not  in  the  church.  In  the  tenth  century,  however, 
the  patriarch  Theophylactus  won  an  unenviable  reputation 
by  admitting  dances  and  profane  songs  into  the  ecclesiastical 
festivals 2  ;  while  in  the  twelfth,  the  patriarch  Balsamon 
describes  his  own  unavailing  struggle  against  proceedings 
at  Christmas  and  Candlemas,  which  come  uncommonly  near 
the  Feast  of  Fools.  The  clergy  of  St.  Sophia's,  he  says, 
claim  as  of  ancient  custom  to  wear  masks,  and  to  enter  the 
church  in  the  guise  of  soldiers,  or  of  monks,  or  of  four-footed 
animals.  The  superintendents  snap  their  fingers  like  cha- 
rioteers, or  paint  their  faces  and  mimic  women.  The  rustics 
are  moved  to  laughter  by  the  pouring  of  wine  into  pitchers, 
and  are  allowed  to  chant  Kyrie  eleison  in  ludicrous  iteration 
at  every  verse3.     Balsamon,  who  died  in  11 93,  was  almost 

1  C.  of  Constantinople  (869-70),  nias,  damnationes  et    depositiones 

c.  16  (Mansi,  xvi.  169,  ex  versione  episcoporum  quasi  ab  in vicemet  per 

Latina,   abest   in    Graeca)    '  fuisse  invicem  miserabiliter  et   praevari- 

quosdam     laicos,    qui     secundum  catorie  agentes  et  patientes.     Talis 

diversam  imperatoriam  dignitatem  autem   actio    nee    apud   gentes    a 

videbantur  capillorum  comam  cir-  saeculo  unquam  audita  est.' 

cumplexam     involvere    atque     re-  2  Cedrenus,  Historiarum    Com- 

ponere,  et  gradum   quasi  sacerdo-  fiendhtm,  p.  639  B  (ed.  Bekker,  in 

talem    per    quaedam    inducia    et  Corp.  Hist, By z. yam. 2. 333), follows 

vestimenta  sacerdotalia  sumere,  et,  verbatim  the  still  unprintedeleventh- 

ut  putabatur,  episcopos  constituere,  century    John    Scylitzes    (Gibbon- 

superhumeralibus,  id  est,  palliis,cir-  Bury,  v.  508).     Theophylactus  was 

cumamictos,  etomnem  aliam  Ponti-  Patriarch  from  933  to  956. 

ficalem  indutos  stolam,  qui  etiam  3  Theodorus  Balsamon,  In  Can. 

proprium  patriarcham  adscribentes  Ixii  Cone,  in  Trullo  (P.  G.  exxxvii. 

eum  qui  in   adinventionibus  risum  727)   ^rjpdaaai  tov  irapovra  navova, 

moventibus    praelatus   et   princeps  kcli  £t)tt)o-ov  bi6p6uxriv  eVl  rols  yivo- 

erat,    et    insultabant  et   illudebant  pivois   napa    rcov    KkrjpiKav    els    ttjv 

quibusque    divinis,   modo    quidem  iopTrjv  eiri  rijs  yewrjaccos  rov  Xpta-rov, 

electiones,    promotiones   et   conse-  *al  rr\v  eoprijv  tu>v  Q?a>Ta>v  [Lumina- 

crationes,  modo  autem  acute  calum-  rium,  Candlemas]  vntvavriias  rovra>' 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  329 

precisely  a  contemporary  of  Belethus,  and  the  earlier  By- 
zantine notices  considerably  ante-date  any  records  that  we 
possess  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  in  the  West.  A  slight  cor- 
roboration of  this  theory  of  an  eastern  origin  may  be  derived 
from  the  use  of  the  term  '  patriarch  '  for  the  domimis  festi 
at  Laon  and  Avallon.  It  would,  I  think,  be  far-fetched  to 
find  another  in  the  fact  that  Theophilus,  like  the  western 
'  bishops '  of  Fools,  rode  upon  an  ass,  and  that  the  Prose  de 

I Ane  begins  : 

'  Orientis  partibus, 
adventavit  asinus.' 

In  any  case,  the  oriental  example  can  hardly  be  responsible 
for  more  than  the  admission  of  the  feast  within  the  doors 
of  the  church.  One  cannot  doubt  that  it  was  essentially 
an  adaptation  of  a  folk-custom  long  perfectly  well  known 
in  the  West  itself.  The  question  of  origin  had  already  pre- 
sented itself  to  the  learned  writers  of  the  thirteenth  century. 
William  of  Auxerre,  by  a  misunderstanding  which  I  shall 
hope  to  explain,  traced  the  Feast  of  Fools  to  the  Roman 
Parentalia:  Durandus,  and  the  Paris  theologians  after  him, 
to  the  January  Kalends.  Certainly  Durandus  was  right. 
The  Kalends,  unlike  the  more  specifically  Italian  feasts, 
were  coextensive  with  the  Roman  empire,  and  were  naturally 
widespread  in  Gaul.  The  date  corresponds  precisely  with  that 
by  far  the  most  common  for  the  Feast  of  Fools.  A  singular 
history  indeed,  that  of  the  ecclesiastical  celebration   of  the 

Ka\  pdXXov  els  rrjv  ayia>Ta.TTjv  MeydXrjv  dirpeTrfj,   Iva  npos    yeXcora    robs    (3Xt- 

eKKXr/ariav  .  .  .  aAXd  Kai  rives  <XrjpiKoi  novras   peraKivrjcraxri.       to    8e    ye\av 

Kara  ru>as  eopras  777)6?  &id<popa  pera-  tovs    ayporas    ey^eopevovs    tov    olvnv 

o-xinnrifrvTai  npoaconela.  (cat  nore  pev  rols    iridois,    cocrei    ri   napeTropei'ov  e'£ 

{•Kprjptis  iv  rep  peaovdu  rfjs  eKKXr/crlas  dvayitrjs   eori    toIs    Xrjvo^aroiaii''      el 

pera  aTpartinTiKociv  dp(picov  elaepxovrai,  prjTCS  elnj]  rr)v  craraviKov  ravrqv  e'pya- 

7rore  be  Ka\  coy  pova\o\  npoobevovo'iv,  o~Lav  Karapyelcrdai  Sid  rov  Xeyeiv  tovs 

t)  Kai  ws  £a>u  rerpdnoba.     e'pcoTTjO~as  ovu  dyporas  ov^vorepov  e'cj)'  eKa<rrco  perpa> 

oncos  raiira  napexoopTjOrjaav  ylveadai,  cr)(ebbv  to,  Kvpie  e'Xerjtrov.      to.  pevroi 

oiibev    Te     erepov    fjnovcra    dXX'    77     e'<  irore  yivopeva  dnpenrj  irapa  ra>v  vora- 

paKpds     o~vvi]deias     rnvra     reXeio~dai.  piaiv  iraibob'ibao'KaXayv  Kara  tt]v  eoprrjv 

Totavrd    elatv,   u>s    epo\    boKel,   Kai   to  tu>p  dyiaiu  vorapionv,  pera  it po&unreiwv 

irapa  tivwv  bopevTiKevovraiv  ev  KXrjpa>  QKrjviKotv  hiep^op^vatv  ttjv  dyopdvt  trpo 

yivopeva,  tov  dipa  rols  baKrvXots  Kara  \povuiv  tivuv  Karri  pyrjdrjaav,  Ka6   opi- 

rjvi6\ovs     tvtttovtcov,    Kai     (pvKT)    rals  apov  tov  ayiatrdrov  eKe ivov  narpi.dp\ov 

yvddois  Srjdev  nepinOepevuiv  Kai  invop-  Kvplov  AovKci. 
pivopevaiv  epya  rivd  yvvaiKeia,  Kai  erepa 


330  FOLK  DRAMA 

First  of  January.  Up  to  the  eighth  century  a  fast,  with  its 
mass  pro  prohibendo  ab  idolis,  it  gradually  took  on  a  festal 
character,  and  became  ultimately  the  one  feast  in  the  year 
in  which  paganism  made  its  most  startling  and  persistent 
recoil  upon  Christianity.  The  attacks  upon  the  Kalends 
in  the  disciplinary  documents  form  a  catena  which  extends 
very  nearly  to  the  point  at  which  the  notices  of  the  Feast 
of  Fools  begin.  In  each  alike  the  masking,  in  mimicry  of 
beasts  and  probably  of  beast-gods  or  '  demons,'  appears 
to  have  been  a  prominent  and  highly  reprobated  feature. 
It  is  true  that  we  hear  nothing  of  a  dominus  festi  at  the 
Kalends  ;  but  much  stress  must  not  be  laid  upon  the  omis- 
sion of  the  disciplinary  writers  to  record  any  one  point  in 
a  custom  which  after  all  they  were  not  describing  as  anthro- 
pologists, and  it  would  certainly  be  an  exceptional  Germano- 
Keltic  folk-feast  which  had  not  a  dominus.  As  a  matter  of 
fact,  there  is  no  mention  of  a  rex  in  the  accounts  of  the 
pre-Christian  Kalends  in  Italy  itself.  There  was  a  rex  at  the 
Saturnalia,  and  this,  together  with  an  allusion  of  Belethus 
in  a  quite  different  connexion  to  the  libertas  Decembrica1, 
has  led  some  writers  to  find  in  the  Saturnalia,  rather  than 
the  Kalends,  the  origin  of  the  Feast  of  Fools2.  This  is, 
I  venture  to  think,  wrong.  The  Saturnalia  were  over  well 
before  December  25 :  there  is  no  evidence  that  they  had 
a  vogue  outside  Italy :  the  Kalends,  like  the  Saturnalia, 
were  an  occasion  at  which  slaves  met  their  masters  upon 
equal  terms,  and  I  believe  that  the  existence  of  a  Kalends 
rex,  both  in  Italy  and  in  Gaul,  may  be  taken  for  granted. 

But  the  parallel  between  Kalends  and  the  Feast  of  Fools 
cannot  be  held  to  be  quite  perfect,  unless  we  can  trace  in 
the  latter  feast  that  most  characteristic  of  all  Kalends  customs, 
the  Cervulus.  Is  it  possible  that  a  representative  of  the 
Cervulus  is  to  be  found  in  the  Ass,  who,  whether  introduced 
from  Constantinople  or  not,  gave  to  the  Feast  of  Fools  one 
of  its  popular  names  ?  The  Feast  of  Asses  has  been  the  sport 
of  controversialists  who  had  not,  and  were  at  no  great  pains 

1  Belethus,  c.  120,  compares  the      not  speaking  here  of  the  Feast  of 
ecclesiastical    ball-play   at    Easter      Fools, 
to  the  libertas  Decembrica.      He  is  2  e.g.  Du  Tilliot,  2. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  331 

to  have,  the  full  facts  before  them.  I  do  not  propose  to 
awake  once  more  these  ancient  angers  \  The  facts  them- 
selves are  briefly  these.  The  '  Prose  of  the  Ass '  was  used 
at  Bourges,  at  Sens,  and  at  Beauvais.  As  to  the  Bourges 
feast  I  have  no  details.  At  Sens,  the  use  of  the  Prose  by- 
Pierre  de  Corbeil  is  indeed  no  proof  that  he  allowed  an  ass 
to  appear  in  the  ceremony.  But  the  Prose  would  not  have 
much  point  unless  it  was  at  least  a  survival  from  a  time  when 
an  ass  did  appear  ;  the  feast  was  known  as  the  asinaria  fcsta; 
and  even  now,  three  centuries  after  it  was  abolished,  the  Sens 
choir-boys  still  play  at  being  due  archbishop  on  Innocents' 
day 2.  At  Beauvais  the  heading  Conductus  quando  asinus 
adducitur  in  the  thirteenth-century  Officium  seems  to  show 
that  there  at  least  the  ass  appeared,  and  even  entered  the 
church.  The  document,  also  of  the  thirteenth  century,  quoted 
by  the  editors  of  Ducange,  certainly  brings  him,  in  the 
ceremony  of  January  14,  into  the  church  and  near  the  altar. 
An  imitation  of  his  braying  is  introduced  into  the  service 
itself.  At  Autun  the  leading  of  an  ass  ad  processionem,  artd 
the  cantileiia  s?tper  dictum  asimim  were  suppressed  in  141 1. 
At  Chalons-sur-Marne  in  1570  an  ass  bore  the  '  bishop '  to 
the  theatre  at  the  church  door  only.  At  Prague,  on  the 
other  hand,  towards  the  end  of  the  fourteenth  century,  an 
ass  was  led,  as  at  Beauvais,  right  into  the  church.  These, 
with  doubtful  references  to  fetes  des  dues  at  St.  Quentin  about 
1081,  at  Bethune  in  1474,  and  at  Laon  in  1537,  and  the 
Mosburg  description  of  the  '  bishop '  as  asinorum  do-minus, 
are  all  the  cases  I  have  found  in  which  an  ass  has  anything 
to  do  with  the  feast.  But  they  are  enough  to  prove  that  an 
ass  was  an  early  and  widespread,  though  not  an  invariable 
feature.  I  may  quote  here  a  curious  survival  in  a  ronde  from 
the  west  of  France,  said  to  have  been  sung  at  church  doors 
on  January  1 3.      It  is  called  La  Mort  de  FAne,  and  begins: 

1  S.  R.  Maitland,  The  Dark  Ages,  2  CheVest,  81. 

141,  tilts  at  the  Protestant  historian  3  J.  Bujeaud,  Chants  et  Chansons 

Robertson's  History  of  Charles  V,  populaires  des  Provinces  de  POuest, 

as  do  F.  Clement,  1 59,  and  A.  Walter,  i.  63.  The  ronde  is  known  in  Poitou, 

Das  Eselsfest  in  Caecilien-Kalender  Aunis,  Angoumois.     P.  Tarbe',  Ro- 

(1885),   75,  at    Dulaure,  Hist,   des  mancero  de  Champagne  (2e  partie), 

Environs  de  Paris,   iii.  509,  and  257,  gives  a  variant.   Bujeaud,  i.  61, 

other  '  Voltairiens.'  gives  another  ronde,  the  Testament 


332  FOLK  DRAMA 

'  Quand  le  bonhomme  s'en  va, 
Quand  le  bonhomme  s'en  va, 
Trouvit  la  tete  a  son  ane, 
Que  le  loup  mangit  au  bois. 

ParU.     O  tete,  pauvre  tete, 
Ta  qui  chantas  si  be 
V Magnificat  a  Vepres. 

Daux  matin  a  quat'  lecons, 
La  sambredondon,  bredondaine, 
Daux  matin  a  quat'  lecons, 
La  sambredondon.' 

This,  like  the  Sens  choir-boys'  custom  of  calling  their  '  arch- 
bishop '  dne,  would  seem  to  suggest  that  the  dominus  festi 
was  himself  the  ass,  with  a  mask  on  ;  and  this  may  have  been 
sometimes  the  case.  But  in  most  of  the  mediaeval  instances 
the  ass  was  probably  used  to  ride.  At  Prague,  so  far  as 
one  can  judge  from  Huss's  description,  he  was  a  real  ass. 
There  is  no  proof  in  any  of  the  French  examples  that  he 
was,  or  was  not,  merely  a  '  hobby-ass.'  If  he  was,  he  came 
all  the  nearer  to  the  Cervulus. 

It  has  been  pointed  out,  and  will,  in  the  next  volume,  be 
pointed  out  again,  that  the  ecclesiastical  authorities  attempted 
to  sanctify  the  spirit  of  play  at  the  Feast  of  Fools  and 
similar  festivities  by  diverting  the  energies  of  the  revellers 
to  ludi  of  the  miracle-play  order.  In  such  ludi  they  found 
a  place  for  the  ass.  He  appears  for  instance  as  Balaam's 
ass  in  the  later  versions  from  Laon  and  Rouen  of the  Prophetae, 
and  at  Rouen  he  gave  to  the  whole  of  this  performance  the 
name  of  the  festum  or  processio  asinorum  \     At  Hamburg, 

df.   FAne,   in   which    the    ass    has  522,  with  the  Beauvais  Offitium  in 

fallen    into   a   ditch,  and  amongst  his  mind,  says  '  Voulez-vous  qu'au 

other  legacies   leaves   his    tail    to  lieu  de  dire,  Ite,  missa  est,  le  pretre 

the  cure  for  an   aspersoir.      This  se  mette  a  braire  trois  fois  de  toute 

is   known   in    Poitou,   Angoumois,  sa  force,  et  que  le  peuple  re"ponde 

Franche-Comte.    He  also  says  that  en  chceur,  comme  je  1'ai  vu  faire 

he   has  heard   children   of  Poitou  en   1788,   dans   l'dglise   de  Bellai- 

and  Angoumois  go  through  a  mock  gues,  en  Pe"rigord  ? ' 

catechism,  giving  an  ecclesiastical  x  Cf.  ch.  xx.    Gaste,  20,  considers 

significance  to  each  part  of  the  ass.  the  Rouen  Festum  Asinorum  'l'ori- 

The  tail  is  the  goupillon,  and  so  gine  de  toutes  les  Fetes  de  l'Ane 

forth.  Fournier-Verneuil,/3arz'.s-,  Ta-  qui    se    cdlebraient    dans    d'autres 

bleau  moral  et  philosophique  (1826),  dioceses':  but  the  Rouen  MS.  in 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS 


333 


by  a  curious  combination,  he  is  at  once  Balaam's  ass  and 
the  finder  of  the  star  in  a  ludus  Trium  Regum1.  His  use 
as  the  mount  of  the  Virgin  on  January  14  at  Beauvais,  and  on 
some  uncertain  day  at  Sens,  seems  to  suggest  another  favourite 
episode  in  such  ludi,  that  of  the  Flight  into  Egypt.  At 
Varennes,  in  Picardy,  and  at  Bayonne,  exist  carved  wooden 
groups  representing  this  event.  That  of  Varennes  is  carried 
in  procession  ;  that  of  Bayonne  is  the  object  of  pilgrimage  on 
the  fetes  of  the  Virgin  2. 

Not  at  the  Feast  of  Fools  alone,  or  at  the  miracle-plays 
connected  with  this  feast,  did  the  ass  make  its  appearance  in 
Christian  worship.  It  stood  with  the  ox,  on  the  morning 
of  the  Nativity,  beside  the  Christmas  crib.  On  Palm  Sunday 
it  again  formed  part  of  a  procession,  in  the  semblance  of 
the  beast  on  which  Christ  made  his  triumphal  entry  into 
Jerusalem 3.  A  Cambrai  Ordinarium  quoted  by  Ducange 
directs  that  the  asina  picta  shall  remain  behind  the  altar 
for    four    days4.      Kirchmeyer   describes   the   custom    as   it 


which  it  occurs  is  only  of  the  four- 
teenth century,  and  the  Balaam 
episode  does  not  occur  at  all  in 
the  more  primitive  forms  of  the 
Prophetae,  while  the  Sens  Feast 
of  Fools  is  called  the  festa  asinaria 
in  the  Officium  of  the  early  thir- 
teenth century. 

1  Tille,  D.  W.  31.  In  Madrid 
an  ass  was  led  in  procession  on 
Jan.  17,  with  anthems  on  the  Balaam 
legend  (Clement,  181). 

2  Cldment,  182;  D'idr  on,  Annates 
arche'ologiques,  xv.  384. 

3  Dulaure,  Hist,  des  Environs  de 
Paris,  iii.  509,  quotes  a  legend  to 
the  effect  that  the  very  ass  ridden 
by  Christ  came  ultimately  to  Verona, 
died  there,  was  buried  in  a  wooden 
effigy  at  Sta-Maria  in  Organo,  and 
honoured  by  a  yearly  procession. 
He  guesses  at  this  as  the  origin  of 
the  Beauvais  and  other  fetes.  Di- 
dron,  Annates  arcn.xv.  377,  xvi.  33, 
found  that  nothing  was  known  of 
this  legend  at  Verona,  though  such 
a  statue  group  as  is  described  above 
apparently  existed  in  the  church 
named.      Dulaure    gives     as    his 


authorities  F.  M.  Misson,  Nouveau 
Voyage  d'ltalie  (1731),  i.  164  ;  Diet, 
de  Vltalie,  i.  56.  Misson's  visit  to 
Verona  was  in  1687,  although  the 
passage  was  not  printed  in  the 
first  edition  (1691)  of  his  book. 
It  is  in  the  English  translation  of 
17 1 4  (i.  198).  His  authority  was 
a  French  merchant  (M.  Montel) 
living  in  Verona,  who  had  often 
seen  the  procession.  In  Cenni 
intorno  alf  origine  e  descrizione 
delta  Festa  che  annualmente  si 
eclebra  in  Verona  f  ultimo  Venerdl 
del  Carnovale,  comunaynente  de- 
nominata  Gnoccolare  (1818),  75,  is 
a  mention  of  the  '  asinello  del 
vecchio  padre  Sileno '  which  served 
as  a  mount  for  the  '  Capo  de'  Mac- 
cheroni.'  This  is  probably  Misson's 
procession,  but  there  is  no  mention  of 
the  legend  in  any  of  the  eighteenth- 
century  accounts  quoted  in  the 
pamphlet.  Rienzi  was  likened  to  an 
Abbate  Asinino'  (Gibbon,  vii.  269). 
4  Ducange,  s.  v.  Festum  Asino- 
rum  ;  cf.  Leber,  ix.  270  ;  Molanus, 
de  Hist.  SS.  Imaginum  et  Pictu- 
rarum  (1594),  iv.  18. 


334 


FOLK  DRAMA 


existed  during  the  sixteenth  century  in  Germany 1  ;  and  the 
stray  tourist  who  drops  into  the  wonderful  collection  of 
domestic  and  ecclesiastical  antiquities  in  the  Barfiisserkirche 
at  Basle  will  find  there  three  specimens  of  the  Palmesel, 
including  a  thirteenth-century  one  from  Bayern  and  a  seven- 
teenth-century one  from  Elsass.  The  third  is  not  labelled 
with  Its,  provenance,  but  it  is  on  wheels  and  has  a  hole  for  the 
rope  by  which  it  was  dragged  round  the  church.  All  three 
are  of  painted  wood,  and  upon  each  is  a  figure  representing 
Christ  2. 

The  affiliation  of  the  ecclesiastical  New  Year  revelries 
to  the  pagan  Kalends  does  not  explain  why  those  who  took 
part  in  them  were  called  '  Fools.'  The  obvious  thing  to  say 
is  that  they  were  called  '  Fools  '  because  they  played  the 
fool  ;   and  indeed  their  mediaeval  critics  were  not  slow  to 


1  T.  Naogeorgus  (Kirchmeyer), 
The  Popish  Kingdom,  iv.  443  (1553, 
transl.  Barnabe  Googe,  1570,  in 
New  Shakspere  Society  edition 
of  Stubbes,  Anatomy  of  Abuses,  i. 
332)  ;  cf.  Beehive  of  the  Roman 
Church,  199.  The  earliest  notice 
is  inGerardus,  Leben  St .  Ulrichs  von 
Augsburg(ob.  973),  c.  4.  E. Bishop, 
in  Dublin  Review,  cxxiii.  405,  traces 
the  custom  in  a  Prague  fourteenth- 
century  Missal  and  sixteenth-cen- 
tury Breviary  ;  also  in  the  modern 
Greek  Church  at  Moscow  where 
until  recently  the  Czar  held  the 
bridle.  But  there  is  no  ass,  as  he 
says,  in  the  Palm  Sunday  cere- 
mony described  in  the  Peregrinatio 
Silviae  (Duchesne,  486). 

2  A  peeress  of  the  realm  lately 
stated  that  this  custom  had  been 
introduced  in  recent  years  into  the 
Anglican  church.  Denials  were  to 
hand,  and  an  amazing  conflict  of 
evidence  resulted.  Is  there  any 
proof  that  the  Palmesel  was  ever 
an  English  ceremony  at  all  ?  The 
Hereford  riding  of  1706  (cf.  Repre- 
sentations) was  not  in  the  church. 
Brand,  i.  73,  quotes  A  Dialogue: 
the  Pilgremage  of  Pure  Devotyon 
(1551?),  'Upon  Palme  Sondaye 
they  play  the  foles  sadely,  drawynge 
after  them  an  Asse  in  a  rope,  when 


they  be  not  moche  distante  from 
the  Woden  Asse  that  they  drawe.' 
Clearly  this,  like  Googe's  translation 
of  Naogeorgus,  is  a  description  of 
contemporary  continental  Papistry. 
W.  Fulke,  The  Text  of  the  New 
Testament  (ed.  1633),  76  {ad  Marc. 
xi.  8)  quotes  a  note  of  the  Rheims 
translation  to  the  effect  that  in 
memory  of  the  entry  into  Jerusalem 
is  a  procession  on  Palm  Sunday 
'  with  the  blessed  Sacrament  reve- 
rently carried  as  it  were  Christ  upon 
the  Asse,'  and  comments,  '  But  it 
is  pretty  sport,  that  you  make  the 
Priest  that  carrieth  the  idoll,  to 
supply  the  roome  of  the  Asse  on 
which  Christ  did  ride.  .  .  .  Thus 
you  turn  the  holy  mysterie  of 
Christ's  riding  to  Jerusalem  to  a 
May  -  game  and  Pageant  -  play.' 
Fulke,  who  lived  1538-89,  is  evi- 
dently unaware  that  there  was  an 
ass,  as  well  as  the  priest,  in  the 
procession,  from  which  I  infer  that 
the  custom  was  not  known  in  Eng- 
land. Not  that  this  consideration 
would  weigh  with  the  mediaevally- 
minded  curate,  who  is  as  a  rule  only 
too  ready  to  make  up  by  the  cere- 
monial inaccuracy  of  his  mummeries 
for  the  offence  which  they  cause  to 
his  congregation. 


THE  FEAST  OF  FOOLS  335 

draw  this  inference.  But  it  is  noteworthy  that  pagan  Rome 
already  had  its  Feast  of  Fools,  which,  indeed,  had  nothing 
to  do  with  the  Kalends.  The  stultorum  feriae  on  February  17 
was  the  last  day  on  which  the  Fornacalia  or  ritual  sacrifice 
of  the  curiae  was  held.  Upon  it  all  the  curiae  sacrificed  in 
common,  and  it  therefore  afforded  an  opportunity  for  any 
citizen  who  did  not  know  which  his  curia  was  to  partake 
in  the  ceremony1.  I  am  not  prepared  to  say  that  the  stul- 
torum feriae  gave  its  name  to  the  Feast  of  Fools  ;  but  the 
identity  of  the  two  names  certainly  seems  to  explain  some 
of  the  statements  which  mediaeval  scholars  make  about  that 
feast.  It  explains  William  of  Auxerre's  derivation  of  it  from 
the  Parentalia,  for  the  stultorum  feriae  fell  in  the  midst  of 
the  Parentalia11.  And  I  think  it  explains  the  remark  of 
Belethus,  and,  following  him,  of  Durandus,  about  the  ordo 
stibdiaconortim  being  incertus.  The  sub-deacons  were  a  regular 
ordo,  the  highest  of  the  ordines  minores  from  the  third 
century3.  But  Belethus  seems  to  be  struggling  with  the 
notion  that  the  sub-deacons'  feast,  closing  the  series  of  post- 
Nativity  feasts  held  by  deacons,  priests  and  choir-boys,  was 
in  some  way  parallel  to  the  feriae  of  the  Roman  slulti  who 
were  incerti  as  to  their  curia. 

1  Marquardt-Mommsen,  vi.  191 ;        '  stultaque   pars   populi,  quae  sit 
Jevons,  Plutarch's  Romane  Ques-  sua  curia,  nescit  ; 

tions,  134  ;  Fowler,  304,  322  ;  Ovid,  sed  facit  extrema  sacra  relata 

Fasti,  ii.  531  :  .        die.' 

8  Fowler,  306.     s  Schaff,  iii.  131. 


CHAPTER  XV 
THE  BOY  BISHOP 


[Bibliographical  Note. — Most  of  the  authorities  for  chh.  xiii,  xiv,  are 
still  available,  since  many  writers  have  not  been  careful  to  distinguish 
between  the  various  feasts  of  the  Twelve  nights.  The  best  modern 
account  of  the  Boy  Bishop  is  Mr.  A.  F.  Leach's  paper  on  The  Schoolboys' 
Feast  in  The  Fortnightly  Review,  N.  S.  lix  (1896),  128.  The  contributions 
of  F.  A.  Diirr,  Comment  alio  Historica  de  Episcopo  Puerorum,  vulgo  vom 
Schul-Bischoff (1755) ;  F.  A.  Specht,  Geschichte  des  Unterrichtswesens  in 
Deutschland,  222  sqq.  (1885);  A.  Gaste",  Les  Drames  liturgiques  de  la 
Cathe'drale  de  Rouen,  35  sqq.  (1893) ;  E.  F.  Rimbault,  The  Festival  of  the 
Boy  Bishop  in  England  in  The  Camden  Miscellany ,  vol.  vii  (Camden 
Soc.  1875),  are  a'so  valuable.  Dr.  Rimbault  speaks  of  'considerable 
collections  for  a  history  of  the  festival  of  the  Boy  Bishop  throughout 
Europe,'  made  by  Mr.  J.  G.  Nichols,  but  I  do  not  know  where  these  are 
to  be  found.  Brand  (ed.  Ellis),  i.  227  sqq.,  has  some  miscellaneous  data, 
and  a  notice  interesting  by  reason  of  its  antiquity  is  that  on  the  Episcopus 
Puerorum,  in  Die  Innocentium,  in  the  Posthuma,  95  sqq.,  of  John  Gregory 
(1649)-] 

Joannes  Belethus,  the  learned  theologian  of  Paris  and 
Amiens,  towards  the  end  of  the  twelfth  century,  describes,  as 
well  as  the  Feast  of  Fools,  no  less  than  three  other  tripudia 
falling  in  Christmas  week 1.  Upon  the  days  of  St.  Stephen, 
St.  John  the  Evangelist,  and  the  Holy  Innocents,  the  deacons, 

1  Belethus,  c.  70  '  Debent   ergo  pro    Christo    occisi   sunt,   ...  in 

vesperaeNatalis  primo  integre  cele-  festo    itaque    Innocentium   penitus 

brari,  ac  postea  conveniunt  diaconi  subticentur  cantica  laetitiae,  quo- 

quasi  in  tripudio,  cantantque  Mag-  niam  ii  ad   inferos   descenderunt.' 

nificat  cum   antiphona  de    S.  Ste-  Cf.  also    c.  72,  quoted  on   p.  275. 

phano,    sed    sacerdos   recitat    col-  Durandus,  Rat.   Div.   Off.    (1284), 

lectam.     Nocturnos    et   universum  vii.  42,  Defeslis  SS.  Stephani, loan- 

officium   crastinum   celebrant    dia-  nis  Evang.  et  Innocentium,  gives  a 

coni,   quod    Stephanus   fuerit   dia-  similar  account.      At    Vespers   on 

conus,   et   ad  lectiones    concedunt  Christmas  Day, he  says,  the  deacons 

benedictiones,   ita   tamen,   ut   eius  '  in   tripudio   convenientes   cantant 

diei  missam  celebret  hebdomarius,  antiphonam   de    sancto   Stephano, 

hoc  est  ille  cuius  turn  vices  fuerint  et  sacerdos  collectam.     Nocturnos 

earn    exsequi.     Sic    eodem    modo  autem  et  officium  in  crastinum  cele- 

omne  officium  perncient  sacerdotes  brant   et    benedictiones    super    le- 

ipso    die    B.    loannis,    quod     hie  ctiones  dant :    quod  tamen  facere 

sacerdos    fuerit,   et  pueri    in   ipso  non  debent.'    So  too  for  the  priests 

festo  Innocentium,  quia  innocentes  and  boys  on  the  following  days. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  337 

the  priests,  the  choir-boys,  held  their  respective  revels,  each 
body  in  turn  claiming  that  pre-eminence  in  the  divine  services 
which  in  the  Feast  of  Fools  was  assigned  to  the  sub-deacons. 
The  distinction  drawn  by  Belethus  is  not  wholly  observed  in 
the  ecclesiastical  prohibitions  either  of  the  thirteenth  or  of  the 
fifteenth  century.  In  many  of  these  the  term  '  Feast  of  Fools' 
has  a  wide  meaning.  The  council  of  Nevers  in  1246  includes 
under  it  the  feasts  of  the  Innocents  and  the  New  Year ;  that 
of  Langres  in  1404  the  '  festivals  of  the  Nativity '  ;  that  of 
Nantes  in  143 1  the  Nativity  itself,  St.  Stephen's,  St.  Johns, 
and  the  Innocents'.  For  the  council  of  Basle  it  is  apparently 
synonymous  with  the  '  Feast  of  Innocents  or  Boys ' ;  the 
Paris  theologians  speak  of  its  rites  as  practised  on  St.  Stephen's, 
the  Innocents',  the  Circumcision,  and  other  dates.  The  same 
tendency  to  group  all  these  tripudia  together  recurs  in 
passages  in  which  the  '  Feast  of  Fools '  is  not  in  so  many 
words  mentioned.  The  famous  decretal  of  Pope  Innocent  III 
is  directed  against  the  ludibria  practised  in  turns  by  deacons, 
priests,  and  sub-deacons  during  the  feasts  immediately  follow- 
ing upon  Christmas.  The  irrisio  servitii  inveighed  against 
in  the  Rememoratio  of  Gerson  took  place  on  Innocents'  day, 
on  the  Circumcision,  on  the  Epiphany,  or  at  Shrovetide. 

Local  usage,  however,  only  partly  bears  out  this  loose 
language  of  the  prohibitions.  At  Chalons-sur-Marne,  in 
1570, the  'bishop'  of  Fools  sported  on  St.  Stephen's  day.  At 
Besancon,  in  1387,  a  distinct  dominus  festi  was  chosen  on 
each  of  the  three  days  after  Christmas,  and  all  alike  were 
called  rots  des  fous.  At  Autun,  during  the  fifteenth  cen- 
tury, the  regna  of  the  'bishop'  and  'dean'  of  Innocents  and 
of  '  Herod '  at  the  New  Year  were  known  together  as  the 
festa  folorum.  Further  south,  the  identification  is  perhaps 
more  common.  At  Avallon,  Aix,  Antibes,  the  Feast  of  Fools 
was  on  Innocents'  day ;  at  Aries  the  episcopus  stidtorum 
officiated  both  on  the  Innocents'  and  on  St.  John's,  at  Viviers 
on  all  three  of  the  post-Nativity  feasts.  But  these  are  excep- 
tions, and,  at  least  outside  Provence,  the  rule  seems  to  have 
been  to  apply  the  name  of  '  Feast  of  Fools'  to  the  tripudium, 
originally  that  of  the  sub-deacons,  on  New  Year's  day  or  the 
Epiphany,  and  to  distinguish  from  this,  as  does  Belethus,  the 

CHAMBERS.     I  7. 


338  FOLK  DRAMA 

tripudia  of  the  deacons,  priests,  and  choir-boys  in  Christmas 
week. 

We  may  go  further  and  say,  without  much  hesitation,  that 
the  three  latter  feasts  are  of  older  ecclesiastical  standing  than 
their  riotous  rival.  Belethus  is  the  first  writer  to  mention 
the  Feast  of  Fools,  but  he  is  by  no  means  the  first  writer 
to  mention  the  Christmas  tripudia.  They  were  known  to. 
Honorius  of  Autun 1,  early  in  the  twelfth  century,  and  to 
John  of  Avranches 2,  late  in  the  eleventh.  They  can  be 
traced  at  least  from  the  beginning  of  the  tenth,  more  than 
two  hundred  and  fifty  years  before  the  Feast  of  Fools  is  heard 
of.  The  earliest  notice  I  have  come  across  is  at  the  monastery 
of  St.  Gall,  hard  by  Constance,  in  911.  In  that  year  King 
Conrad  I  was  spending  Christmas  with  Bishop  Solomon  of 
Constance.  He  heard  so  much  of  the  Vespers  processions 
during  the  triduum  at  St.  Gall  that  he  insisted  on  visiting  the 
monastery,  and  arrived  there  in  the  midst  of  the  revels.  It 
was  all  very  amusing,  and  especially  the  procession  of 
children,  so  grave  and  sedate  that  even  when  Conrad  bade 
his  train  roll  apples  along  the  aisle  they  did  not  budge3. 
That  the  other  Vespers  processions  of  the  triduum  were  of 
deacons  and  priests  may  be  taken  for  granted.  I  do  not 
know  whether  the  triduum  originated  at  St.  Gall,  but  the 
famous  song-school  of  that  monastery  was  all-important  in 

1  Honorius  Augustodunensis,  of  the  song-school,  and  von  Knonau 
Gemma  Animae,  iii.  12  {P.  L.  clxxii.  mentions  some  cantiones  written  by 
646).  him  and  others  for  the  feast,  e.  g. 

2  Ioannes  Abrincensis  (bishop  of  one  beginning  '  Salve  lacteolo  de- 
Rouen  1-1070),  de  Eccl.  Offic.  {P.  L.  coratum  sanguine  festum.'  He  has 
cxlvii.  41),  with  fairly  full  account  another  story  (c.  26)  of  how  Solo- 
of  the  '  officia.'  mon  who  was  abbot  of  the  monas- 

8  Ekkehardus  IV,  de  Casibus  S.  tery,  as  well  as  bishop  of  Constance, 

Galli,    c.    14   (ed.    G.    Meyer    von  looking  into  the  song-school  on  the 

Knonau,     in     Mittheilungen    zur  'dies    scolarium,'   when   the    boys 

vaterlandischen  Gesch.  of  the  Hist,  had  a (ius  .  .  .  ut  hospites  intrantes 

Verein   in    St.    Gallen,   N.  F.,  v. ;  capiant,  captos,  usque  dum  se  redi- 

M.  G.  H.  Scriptores,  ii.  84) '  longum  mant,    teneant,'    was    duly    made 

est    dicere,    quibus    iocunditatibus  prisoner,  and  set  on  the  master's 

dies  exegerit  et  noctes,  maxime  in  seat.     '  Si  in  magistri  solio  sedeo,' 

processione  infantum  ;  quibus  poma  cried  the  witty  bishop,  '  iure  eius 

in     medio     ecclesiae     pavimento  uti  habeo.   Omnes  exuimini.'    After 

antesterni  iubens,  cum  nee  unum  his  jest,  he  paid  his  footing  like  a 

parvissimorum     moveri     nee     ad  man.     The  '  Schulabt '  of  St.  Gall 

ea  adtendere  vidisset,  miratus  est  is  said  to  have  survived  until  the 

disciplinam.'   Ekkehart  was  master  council  of  Trent. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  339 

the  movement  towards  the  greater  elaboration  of  church 
ceremonial,  and  even  more  of  chant,  which  marked  the  tenth 
century.  This  gave  rise  to  the  tropes,  of  which  much  will  be 
said  in  the  next  volume  ;  and  it  is  in  a  tropary,  an  English 
tropary  from  Winchester,  dating  from  before  980,  that  the 
feasts  of  the  triduum  next  occur.  The  ceremonies  of  those 
feasts,  as  described  by  Belethus,  belong  mainly  to  the  Office, 
and  the  tropes  are  mainly  chanted  elaborations  of  the  text 
of  the  Mass :  but  the  Winchester  tropes  for  the  days  of 
St.  Stephen,  St.  John,  and  the  Holy  Innocents  clearly  imply 
the  respective  connexion  of  the  services,  to  which  they  belong, 
with  deacons,  priests,  and  choir-boys 1.  Of  the  sub-deacons, 
on  Circumcision  or  Epiphany,  there  is  as  yet  nothing.  John 
of  Avranches,  Honorius  of  Autun,  and  Belethus  bridge  a  gap, 
and  from  the  thirteenth  century  the  triduum  is  normal  in 
service-books,  both  continental  and  English,  throughout  the 
Middle  Ages  2.  It  is  provided  for  in  the  Nantes  Ordinarium 
of  1 263  s,  in  the  Amiens  Ordinarium  of  1291  4,  and  in  the 
Tours  Rituale  of  the  fourteenth  century  5.  It  required  reform- 
ing at  Vienne  in  1385,  but  continued  to  exist  there  up  to 
1670 6.  In  the  last  three  cases  it  is  clearly  marked  side  by 
side  with,  but  other  than,  the  Feast  of  Fools.    In  Germany,  it 

1  Frere,  Winch.  Troper,  6,  8,  10.  '  propinatur  in  refectorio,  sicut  in 
The  deacons'  sang  '  Eia,  conlevitae      vigilia  nativitatis.' 

in  protomartyris  Stephani  natalicio  3  Martene,  iii.  38  '  tria  festa,  quae 

ex   persona   ipsius   cum   psalmista  sequuntur,  fiunt  cum  magna  solem- 

ouantes  concinnamus ' ;  the  priests,  nitate  et  tripudio.     Primum  faciunt 

'  Hodie  candidati  sacerdotum  chori  diaconi,  secundum  presbiteri,    ter- 

centenietmilleniconiubilentChristo  tium  pueri.' 

dilectoque  suo  Iohanni '  ;  the  boys,  4  Grenier,  353  '  si  festa  [S.  Ste- 

*  Psallite  nunc  Christo  pueri,  dicente  phani]   fiant,  ut   consuetum   est,  a 

propheta.'  diaconis  in  cappis  sericis  ...  fit 

2  Rock,  iii.  2.  214;  Clement,  118;  statio  in  medio  choro,  et  ab  ipsis 
Grenier,  353 ;  Martene,  iii.  38.  regitur  chorus  .  .  .  et  fiant  festa 
These  writers  add  several  refer-  sicut  docent  libri ' ;  and  so  for  the 
ences  for  the  triduum  or  one  or  other  two  other  feasts. 

of  its  feasts  to  those  here  given:  6  Martene,  iii.  38  'cum  in  primis 

e.  g.   Martene   quotes   on   St.   Ste-  vesperis  [in  festo  S.  Stephani]  ad 

phen's   feast   Ordinarium  of  Lan-  ilium  cantici  Magnificat  versiculum 

gres,  'finitis  vesperis  fiunt  tripudia' ;  Deposuit  potentes  perventum  erat, 

Ordinarium   of  Limoges,   'vadunt  cantor    baculum    locumque    suum 

omnes  ad  capitulum,  ubi  Episcopus,  diacono,  qui  pro  eo  chorum  regeret, 

sive   praesens,    sive   absens   fuerit,  cedebat';    and    so    on    the    other 

dat   eis    potum    ex    tribus   vinis ' ;  feasts. 

Ordinarium  of  Strasburg  (+1364),  6  Cf.  p.  315. 

Z  2 


340  FOLK  DRAMA 

is  contemplated  in  the  Ritual  of  Mainz  l.  In  England  I  trace 
it  at  Salisbury2,  at  York3,  at  Lincoln4,  at  St.  Albans5. 
These  instances  could  doubtless  be  multiplied,  although  there 
were  certainly  places  where  the  special  devotion  of  the  three 
feasts  to  the  three  bodies  dropped  out  at  an  early  date.  The 
Rheims  Or  dinar  turn  of  the  fourteenth  century,  for  instance, 
knows  nothing  of  it  6.  The  extent  of  the  ceremonies,  again, 
would  naturally  be  subject  to  local  variation.  The  germ  of 
them  lay  in  the  procession  at  first  Vespers  described  by 
Ekkehard  at  St.  Gall.  But  they  often  grew  to  a  good  deal 
more  than  this.  The  deacons,  priests,  or  choir-boys,  as  the 
case  might  be,  took  the  higher  stalls,  and  the  whole  conduct 
of  the  services;'  the  Deposuit  was  sung;  epistolae  farcitae 
were  read 7 ;   there  was  a  dominus  festi. 

The  main  outlines  of  the  feasts  of  the  triduum  are  thus 
almost  exactly  parallel,  so  far  as  the  divine  scrvitium  is  con- 
cerned, to  those  of  the  Feast  of  Fools,  for  which  indeed  they 
probably  served  as  a  model.  And  like  the  Feast  of  Fools, 
they  had  their  secular  side,  which  often  became  riotousness. 
Occasionally  they  were  absorbed  in,  or  overshadowed  by,  the 
more  popular  and  wilder  merry-making  of  the  inferior  clergy. 


1  Durr,  jj.     Here  the  sub-dea-  the  Minster)  '  In  die  S.  Steph.  .  .  . 
cons  shared  in  the  deacons'  feast.  finita     processione,    si     Dominica 

2  The  Consuetudinarium  offi2io  fuerit,ut  in  Processionali  continetur, 
(Frere,  Use  of  S arum,  i.  124,  223)  Diaconis  et  Subdiaconis  in  choro 
mentions  the  procession  of  deacons  ordinatim  astantibus,  unus  Dia- 
after  Vespers  on  Christmas  day,  conus,  cui  Praecentor  imposuerit, 
but  says  nothing  of  the  share  of  the  incipiatOfficium.  . . .  In  dieS.Ioann. 
priests  and  boys  in  those  of  the  .  ..  omnibus  Personis  et  Presbyteris 
following  days.  The  Sarum  Bre-  civitatis  ex  antiqua  consuetudine  ad 
viary  gives  all  three  (Fasc.  i.  cols.  Ecclesiam  Cathedralem  convenien- 
cxcv,  ccxiii,  ccxxix),  and  has  a  note  tibus,  et  omnibus  ordinate  ex  utra- 
(col.  clxxvi)  'nunquam  enim  dicitur  que  parte  Chori  in  Capis  sericis 
Prosa  ad  Matutinas  per  totum  astantibus,  Praecentor  incipiat  Offi- 
annum,  sed  ad  Vesperas,  et  ad  Pro-  cium.  .  .  .  In  die  SS.  Innoc.  .  .  . 
cessionem,  excepto  die  sancti  Ste-  omnibus  pueris  in  Capis,  Praecentor 
phani,  cuius  servitium  committitur  illorum  incipiat.'  There  are  re- 
voluntati  Diaconorum  ;  et  excepto  sponds  for  the  '  turba  diaconorum,' 
die  sancti  Iohannis,  cuius  servitium  '  presbyterorum  '  or  '  puerorum.' 
committitur  voluntati  Sacerdotum;  *  Lincoln  Statutes,  i.  290;  ii. 
et  excepto  die  sanctorum  Innocen-  ccxxx,  552. 

tium,  cuius  servitium   committitur  5  Gasquet,    Old  English    Bible, 

voluntati  Puerorum.'  250. 

3  York  Missal,  i.  20,  22,  23  (from  6  Martene,  iii.  40. 
fifteenth-century   MS.   D  used   in  7  Ibid.  iii.  39. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


341 


But  elsewhere  they  have  their  own  history  of  reformations  or 
suppression,  or  are  grouped  with  the  Feast  of  Fools,  as  by 
the  decretal  of  Innocent  III,  in  a  common  condemnation. 
The  diversity  of  local  practice  is  well  illustrated  by  the  records 
of  such  acts  of  discipline.  Sometimes,  as  at  Paris l,  or 
Soissons  2,  it  is  the  deacons'  feast  alone  that  has  become  an 
abuse  :  sometimes,  as  at  Worms,  that  of  the  priests' 3  ;  some- 
times two  of  them  4,  sometimes  all  three 5,  require  correction. 


1  In  his  second  decree  of  1199 
as  to  the  feast  of  the  Circumcision 
at  Paris  (cf.  p.  276),  Bishop  Eudes 
de  Sully  says  (P.  L.  ccxii.  73)  '  quo- 
niam  festivitas  beati  protomartyris 
Stephani  eiusdem  fere  subiacebat 
dissolutionis  et  temeritatis  incom- 
modo,  nee  ita  solemniter,  sicut 
decebat  et  martyris  merita  requ ire- 
bant,  in  Ecclesia  Parisiensi  con- 
sueverat  celebrari,  nos,  qui  eidem 
martyri  sumus  specialiter  debitores, 
quoniam  in  Ecclesia  Bituricensi 
patronum  habuerimus,  in  cuius 
gremio  ab  ineunte  aetate  fuimus 
nutriti ;  de  voluntate  et  assensu 
dilectorum  nostrorum  Hugonis  de- 
cani et  capituli  Parisiensis,  festivi- 
tatem  ipsam  ad  statum  reducere 
regularem,eumque  magnis  Ecclesiae 
solemnitatibus  adnumerare  decre- 
vimus  ;  statuentes  ut  in  ipso  festo 
tantum  celebritatis  agatur,  quan- 
tum in  ceteris  festis  annualibus 
fieri  consuevit.'  Eudes  de  Sully 
made  a  donative  to  the  canons  and 
clerks  present  at  Matins  on  the 
feast,  which  his  successor  Petrus  de 
Nemore  confirmed  in  1208  (P.  L. 
ccxii.  91).  Dean  Hugo  Clemens 
instigated  a  similar  reform  of  St. 
John's  day  (see  p.  276). 

2  Martene,  iii.  40;  Grenier,  353, 
412.  The  Ritual  of  Bishop  Nive- 
lon,  at  the  end  of  the  twelfth  cen- 
tury, orders  St.  Stephen's  to  be  kept 
as  a  triple  feast,  '  exclusa  antiqua 
consuetudine  diaconorum  et  ludo- 
rum.' 

3  Schannat,  iv.  258  (1316)  '  illud, 
quod  .  .  .  causa  devotionis  ordina- 
tum  fuerat . . .  ut  Sacerdotes  singulis 
annis  in  festivitate  Beati  Iohannis 
Evangelistae  unum  ex  se  eligant, 


qui  more  episcopi  ilia  die  Missam 
gloriose  celebret  et  festive,  nunc  in 
ludibrium  vertitur,  et  in  ecclesia 
ludi  fiunt  theatrales,  et  non  solum 
in  ecclesia  introducuntur  monstra 
larvarum,  verum  etiam  Presbyteri, 
Diaconi  et  Subdiaconi  insaniae  suae 
ludibria  exercere  praesumunt,  fa- 
cientes  prandia  sumptuosa,  et  cum 
tympanis  et  cymbalis  ducentes 
choreas  per  domos  et  plateas  civi- 
tatis.' 

*  At  Rouen  in  1445  the  feast  of 
St.  John,  held  by  the  capellani,  was 
alone  in  question.  The  chapter 
ordered  (Gaste,  46)  '  ut  faciant  die 
festi  sancti  euangelistae  Iohannis 
servicium  divinum  bene  et  honeste, 
sine  derisionibus  et  fatuitatibus  ;  et 
inhibitum  fuit  eisdem  ne  habeant 
vestes  difformes,  insuper  quod  fiat 
mensa  et  ponantur  boni  cantores, 
qui  bene  sciant  cantare,  omnibus 
derisionibus  cessantibus.'  But  in 
1446.  the  feast  of  St.  Stephen  needed 
reforming,  as  well  as  that  of  St.  John 
(A.  Che>uel,  Hist,  de  Rouen  sous  la 
Domination  anglaise,  206) ;  and  in 
145 1  all  three  (Gast£,  47)  '  praefati 
Domini  capitulantes  ordinaverunt 
quod  in  festis  solemnitatis  Nativi- 
tatis  Domini  nostri  Ihesu  Christi 
proxime  futuris,  omnes  indecencie 
et  inhonestates  consuete  fieri  in 
dedecus  ecclesie,  tam  per  presby- 
teros  dyaconos  quam  pueros  chori 
et  basse  forme,  cessent  omnino,  nee 
sit  aliquis  puer  in  habitu  episcopi, 
sed  fiat  servicium  devote  et  honori- 
fice  prout  in  aliis  festis  similis 
gradus.' 

5  Co/Toledo {i473),c-i9(Lsibb6, 
xiii.  1460)  '  Quia  vero  quaedam 
tam    in    Metropolitans    quam    in 


342 


FOLK  DRAMA 


I  need  only  refer  more  particularly  to  two  interesting  English 
examples.  One  is  at  Wells,  where  a  chapter  statute  of  about 
1331  condemns  the  tumult  and  ludibrium  with  which  divine 
service  was  celebrated"  from  the  Nativity  to  the  octave  of  the 
Innocents,  and  in  particular  the  ludi  theatrales  and  monstra 
larvarum  introduced  into  the  cathedral  by  the  deacons, 
priests,  sub-deacons,  and  even  vicars  during  this  period 1. 
Nor  was  the  abuse  easy  to  check,  for  about  1338  a  second 
statute  was  required  to  reinforce  and  strengthen  the  prohibi- 
tion 2.  So,  too,  in  the  neighbouring  diocese  of  Exeter.  The 
register  of  Bishop  Grandisson  records  the  mandates  against 
ludi  inhonesti  addressed  by  him  in  1360  to  the  chapters  of 
Exeter  cathedral,  and  of  the  collegiate  churches  of  Ottery, 


Cathedralibus  et  aliis  Ecclesiis 
nostrae  prdvinciae  consuetudo  ino- 
levit  ut  videlicet  in  festis  Nativitatis 
Domini  nostri  Iesu  Christi  et  sanc- 
torum Stephani,  Ioannis  et  Inno- 
centium  aliisque  certis  diebus  festi- 
vis,  etiam  in  solemnitatibus  Mis- 
sarum  novarum  dum  divina  aguntur, 
ludi  theatrales,  larvae,  monstra, 
spectacula,  necnon  quamplurima 
inhonesta  et  diversa  figmenta  in 
Ecclesiis  introducuntur  .  .  .  huius- 
modi  larvas,  ludos,  monstra,  specta- 
cula, figmenta  et  tumultuationes  fieri 
.  .  .  prohibemus  .  .  .  Per  hoc  tarn 
honestas  repraesentationes  et  de- 
votas,  quae  populum  ad  devotionem 
movent,  tarn  in  praefatis  diebus 
quam  in  aliis  non  intendimus  pro- 
hibere ' ;  C.  of  Lyons  (1566  and 
1577),  c.  15  (Du  Tilliot,  63)  'Es 
jours  de  Fete  des  Innocens  et  autres, 
Ton  ne  doit  souffrir  es  Eglises 
jouer  jeux,  tragedies,  farces,  &c.' ; 
cf.  the  Cologne  statutes  (1662)  quoted 
on  p.  352. 

1  H.E.Reynolds,  Wells  Cathedral, 
75  '  Quod  non  sint  ludi  contra 
honestatem  Ecclesiae  Wellensis. 
Item  a  festo  Nativitatis  Domini 
usque  ad  octavas  Innocentium  quod 
Clerici  Subdiaconi  Diaconi  Presbi- 
teri  etiam  huius  ecclesiae  vicarii 
ludos  faciant  theatrales  in  ecclesia 
Wellensi  et  monstra  larvarum  in- 
troducentes,    in   ea   insaniae   suae 


ludibriaexercere  praesumunt  contra 
honestatem  clericalem  et  sacrorum 
prohibitionem  canonum  divinum 
officium  multipliciter  impediendo ; 
quod  de  cetero  in  ecclesia  Wellensi 
et  sub  pena  canonica  fieri  pro- 
hibentes  volumus  quod  divinum 
officium  in  festo  dictorum  sanctorum 
Innocentium  sicuti  in  festis  sancto- 
rum consimilibus  quiete  ac  pacifice 
absque  quocunque  tumultu  et 
ludibrio  cum  devotione  debita  cele- 
bretur.' 

2  Reynolds,  op.  cit.  87  '  Prohibitio 
ludorum  theatralium  et  sftecta- 
culorum  et  ostentationum  larvarum 
in  Ecclesia.  Item,  cum  infra  septi- 
manam  Pentecostes  et  etiam  in 
aliis  festivitatibus  fiant  a  laicis  ludi 
theatrales  in  ecclesia  praedicta  et 
non  solum  ad  ludibriorum  specta- 
cula introducantur  in  ea  monstra 
larvarum,  verum  etiam  in  sanctorum 
Innocentium  et  aliorum  sanctorum 
festivitatibus  quae  Natale  Christi 
secuntur,  Presbyteri  Diaconi  et 
Subdiaconi  dictae  Wellensis  eccle- 
siae vicissim  insaniae  suae  ludibria 
exercentes  per  gesticulationem  de- 
bacchationes  obscenas  divinum 
officium  impediant  in  conspectu 
populi,  decus  faciant  clericale  vile- 
scere  quern  potius  illo  tempore 
deberent  praedicatione  mulcere. . . .' 
The  statute  goes  on  to  threaten 
offenders  with  excommunication. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


343 


Crediton,  and  Glasney.  These  ludi  were  performed  by  men 
and  boys  at  Vespers,  Matins,  and  Mass  on  Christmas  and  the 
three  following  days.  They  amounted  to  a  mockery  of  the 
divine  worship,  did  much  damage  to  the  church  vestments 
and  ornaments,  and  brought  the  clergy  into  disrepute  \ 
These  southern  prohibitions  are  shortly  before  the  final 
suppression  of  the  Feast  of  Fools  in  the  north  at  Beverley 
and  Lincoln.  The  Wells  customs,  indeed,  probably  included 
a  regular  Feast  of  Fools,  for  the  part  taken  by  the  sub- 
deacons  and  vicars  is  specifically  mentioned,  and  the  proceed- 
ings lasted  over  the  New  Year.  But  it  is  clear  that  even 
where  the  term  '  Feast  of  Fools '  is  not  known  to  have  been 
in  use,  the  temper  of  that  revel  found  a  ready  vent  in  other 
of  the  winter  rejoicings.  Nor  was  it  the  triduum  alone  which 
afforded  its  opportunities.  More  rarely  the  performances  of 
the  Pastor es  on  Christmas  day  itself2,  or  the  suppers  given 
by  the  great  officers  of  cathedrals  and  monasteries,  when  they 


1  F.  C.  Hingeston  Randolph, 
Bishop  Grandisori s  Register,  Part 
iii,  p.  12 1 3  ;  Inhibicio  Episcopi 
de  ludis  inhonestis.  The  bishop 
writes  to  all  four  bodies  in  identical 
terms.  He  wishes  them  '  Salutem, 
et  morum  clericalium  honestatem,' 
and  adds  'Ad  nostram,  non  sine 
gravi  cordis  displicencia  et  stupore, 
pervenit  noticiam  quod,  annis  prae- 
teritis  et  quibusdam  praecedentibus, 
in  Sanctissimis  Dominice  Nati- 
vitatis,  ac  Sanctorum  Stephani, 
Iohannis,  Apostoli  et  Evangelistae, 
ac  Innocencium  Solempniis,  quando 
omnes  Christi  Fideles  Divinis  laudi- 
busetOfficiisEcclesiasticisdevocius 
ac  quiescius  insistere  tenentur, 
aliqui  praedicte  Ecclesie  nost/e 
Ministri,  cum  pueris,  nedum  Matu- 
tinis  et  Vesperis  ac  Horis  aliis, 
set,  quod  magis  detestandum  est, 
inter  Missarum  Sollempnia,  ludos 
ineptos  et  noxios,  honestatique 
clericali  indecentes,  quia  verius 
Cultus  Divini  ludibria  detestanda, 
infra  Ecclesiam  ipsam  inmiscendo 
committere,  Divino  timore  post- 
posito,  pernicioso  quarundam  Eccle- 
siarum  exemplo,temere  praesumpse- 
runt ;  Vestimenta  et  alia  Ornamenta 


Ecclesie,  in  non  modicum  eiusdem 
Ecclesie  nostre  et  nostrum  dam- 
pnum  et  dedecus,  vilium  scilicet 
scenulentorumque  (or  scev.)  spar- 
sione  multipliciter  deturpando.  Ex 
quorum  gestis,  seu  risibus  et 
cachinnis  derisoriis,  nedum  populus, 
more  Catholico  illis  potissime  tempo- 
ribus  ad  Ecclesiam  conveniens,  a 
debita  devocione  abstrahitur,  set  et 
in  risum  incompositum  ac  oblecta- 
menta  illicitadissolvitur;  Cultusque 
Divinus  irridetur  et  Ofncium  perpe- 
ram  impeditur.  .  .  .' 

2  On  the  Pastores  cf.  ch.  xix. 
Gaste\  33,  gives  several  Rouen 
chapter  acts  from  1449  t0  14S7 
requiring  them  to  officiate  'cessanti- 
bus  stultitiis  et  insolenciis.'  These 
orders  and  those  quoted  on  p.  341 
above  were  prompted  by  the  Letter 
of  the  Paris  theologians  against  the 
Feast  of  Fools  and  similar  revels. 
In  1445  (or  1449)  a  committee  was 
chosen  'ad  videndum  et  visitandum 
ordinationem  ecclesiae  pro  festis 
Nativitatis  Domini  et  deliberationes 
Facultatis  Theologiae  super  hoc 
habitas  et  quod  tollantur  derisiones 
in  ipsis  fieri  solitas.' 


344  FOLK  DRAMA 

sang  their  '  Oes,'  on  the  nights  between  December  16  and 
Christmas  1)  were  the  occasions  for  excesses  which  called  for 
reprehension. 

Already,  when  Conrad  visited  St.  Gall  in  911,  the  third 
feast  of  the  tridnum  was  the  most  interesting.  In  after  years 
this  reached  an  importance  denied  to  the  other  two.  The 
Vespers  procession  was  the  germ  of  an  annual  rejoicing, 
secular  as  well  as  ritual,  which  became  for  the  pueri  attached 
as  choir-boys  and  servers  to  the  cathedrals  and  great  churches 
very  much  what  the  Feast  of  Fools  became  for  the  adult 
inferior  clergy  of  the  same  bodies.  Where  the  two  feasts 
were  not  merged  in  one,  this  distinction  of  personnel  was 
retained.  A  good  example  is  afforded  by  Sens.  Here,  from 
the  middle  of  the  fourteenth  century,  the  chapter  accounts 
show  an  archiepiscopus  puerorum  side  by  side  with  the  dominus 
of  the  Feast  of  Fools.  Each  feast  got  its  own  grant  of  wine 
from  the  chapter,  and  had  its  own  prebend  in  the  chapter 
woods.  In  the  fifteenth  century  the  two  fell  and  rose 
together.  In  the  sixteenth,  the  Feast  of  Boys  was  the  more 
flourishing,  and  claimed  certain  dues  from  a  market  in  Sens, 
which  were  commuted  for  a  small  money  payment  by  the 
chapter.  Finally,  both  feasts  are  suppressed  together  in 
1547  2.  It  is  to  be  observed  that  the  original  celebration  of 
the  Holy  Innocents'  day  in  the  western  Church  was  not  of  an 
unmixed  festal  character.  It  commemorated  a  martyrdom 
which  typified  and  might  actually  have  been  that  of  Christ 
himself,  and  it  was  therefore  held  cum  tristitia.  As  in  Lent 
or  on  Good  Friday  itself,  the  'joyful  chants,'  such  as  the 
Te  Deum  or  the  Alleluia,  were  silenced.     This  characteristic 

1  At  Sarum  a  Constitutio  of  Roger  Green,  On  the  words  '  O  Sapientia ' 

de  Mortival  in  1324  (Dayman  and  in    the    Kalendar    (Archaeologia, 

Jones,  Sarum  Statutes,  52)  forbade  xlix.    219);    Cynewulf,  Christ  (ed. 

drinking   when    the    antiphon    'O  A.  S.  Cook),xxxv.    Payments  '  can- 

Sapientia'  was  sung  after  Compline  toribus  ad  ludum  suum  '  or  '  ad '  or 

on   Dec.    16.    John   of  Avranches  'ante    natale'  appear    in  Durham 

(tio/o)  allowed  for  the  feast  of  his  accounts  ;      cf.     Finchale    Priory 

'  O  '  at  Rouen  '  unum  galcnem  vini  ccccxxviii  (Surtees  Soc.,)  and  Dur- 

de  cellario  archiepiscopi,'  and  the  ham  Accounts, passim  (Surtees  Soc). 

'  vin  de  l'O  '  was  still  given  in  1377  I  do  not  feel  sure  what  feast  is  here 

(Gaste,  47).     On  these  '  Oes,'  sung  referred  to. 

by  the  great  functionaries  of  cathe-  2  Che"rest,  49  sqq. 
drals     and     monasteries,    see    E. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  345 

of  the  day  was  known  to  Belethus,  but  even  before  his  time  it 
had  begun  to  give  way  to  the  festal  tendencies.  Local  practice 
differed  widely,  as  the  notices  collected  by  Martene  show, 
but  even  when  John  of  Avranches  wrote,  at  the  end  of  the 
eleventh  century,  the  'modern'  custom  was  to  sing  the  chants1. 
Many  interesting  details  of  the  Feast  of  Boys,  as  it  was 
celebrated  in  France,  are  contained  in  various  ceremonial 
books.  The  Officium  Infantum  of  Rouen  may  be  taken  as 
typical 2.  After  second  Vespers  on  St.  John's  day  the  boys 
marched  out  of  the  vestry,  two  by  two,  with  their  '  bishop,' 
singing  Centum  quadraginta.  There  was  a  procession 
to  the  altar  of  the  Holy  Innocents,  and  Hi  empti  sunt 
was  sung 3.  Then  the  '  bishop  '  gave  the  Benediction.  The 
feast  of  the  following  day  was  '  double,'  but  the  boys  might 
make  it  '  triple/  if  they  would.  There  was  a  procession,  with 
the  Centum  quadraginta,  at  Matins.  At  Mass,  the  boys  led 
the  choir.  At  Vespers  the  baculus  was  handed  over,  while 
the  Deposuit potentes  was  being  sung  4.  At  Bayeux  the  feast 
followed  the  same  general  lines,  but  the  procession  at  first 
Vespers  was  to  the  altar,  not  of  the  Holy  Innocents,  but  of 
St.  Nicholas  6.  Precise  directions  are  given  as  to  the  functions 
of  the  '  bishop.'  He  is  to  wear  a  silk  tunic  and  cope,  and  to 
have  a  mitre  and  pastoral  staff,  but  not  a  ring.  The  boys 
are  to  do  him  the  same  reverence  that  is  done  to  the  real 


1  Ioannes  Abrincensis,  de  Eccl.  3  These  chants  are  taken  from 
Offic.  (P.  L.  cxlvii.  42)  '  Licet,  ut  in  Revelation,  xiv.  3  '  nemo  poterat 
morte  Domini,  Te  Deum  et  Gloria  dicere  canticum,  nisi  ilia  centum 
in  excelsis  et  Alleluia  in  aliquot  quadraginta  quatuor  millia,  qui 
ecclesiis,  ex  more  antiquo,  omittan-  empti  sunt  de  terra.  Hi  sunt,  qui 
tur  ;  quia  ut  Christus  occideretur  cum  mulieribus  non  sunt  coinqui- 
tot  parvuli  occidi  iubentur  ;  et  illis  nati,  virgines  enim  sunt.  Hi  se- 
occisis  fit  mors  Christi  secundum  quuntur  Agnum  quocumque  ierit.' 
aestimationemHerodis;  tamenquia  This  passage  is  still  read  in  the 
placuit  modernis,  placet  et  nobis  ut  'Epistle' at  Mass  on  Holy  Innocents' 
cantentur  '  ;  cf.  the  passage  from  day.  Cf.  the  use  of  the  same  chants 
Belethus  quoted  on  p.  336 ;  also  at  Salisbury  (Appendix  M). 
Honorius  Augustodunensis,  Gemma  *  '  Et  tamdiu  cantetur  Deposuit 
Animae,  iii.14  {P.L.  clxxii.646),and  potentes  quod  baculus  accipiatur  ab 
Martene,  iii.  40.  eo  qui  accipere  voluerit.' 

2  Ordinarium  of  Rouen  (four-  5  Ordinarium  of  Bayeux  (un- 
teenth  century)  in  Ducange,  s.v.  dated)  in  Gast£,  37.  On  the  Bayeux 
Kalendae;  P.  L.  cxlvii.  155 ;  Gast£,  feast  and  its  parvus  episcopus  or 
35.  On  the  Rouen  feast  cf.  also  petit  e'veque  cf.  F.  Pluquet,  Essaisur 
Gast£,  48. .  Bayeux,  274. 


346  FOLK  DRAMA 

bishop.  There  are  also  to  be  a  boy  cantor  and  a  boy  '  chaplain.' 
The  '  bishop '  is  to  perform  the  duties  of  a  priest,  so  long 
as  the  feast  lasts,  except  in  the  Mass.  He  is  to  give  the 
benediction  after  Benedicamus  at  first  Vespers.  Then  the 
boys  are  to  take  the  higher  stalls,  and  to  keep  them 
throughout  the  following  day,  the  '  bishop  '  sitting  in  the 
dean's  chair.  The  boys  are  to  say  Compline  as  they  will. 
The  '  bishop '  is  to  be  solemnly  conducted  home  with  the 
prose  Sedentem,  and  on  the  following  day  he  is  to  be 
similarly  conducted  both  to  and  from  service.  At  Mass 
he  is  to  cense  and  be  censed  like  the  '  great  bishop '  on 
solemn  occasions.  He  is  also  to  give  the  benediction  at 
Mass.  There  is  a  minute  description  of  the  ceremony  of 
Deposuit,  from  which  it  is  clear  that,  at  Bayeux  at  least,  the 
handing  over  of  the  baculus  was  from  an  incoming  to  an 
outgoing  '  bishop,'  to  whom  the  former  was  in  turn  to  act 
as  '  chaplain  V  The  rubrics  of  the  Coutances  feast  are  even 
more  minute 2.  The  proceedings  began  after  Matins  on 
St.  John's  day,  when  the  boys  drew  up  a  tabula  appointing 
their  superiors  to  the  minor  offices  of  the  coming  feast.  This, 
however,  they  were  to  do  without  impertinence 3.  The 
vesting  of  the  '  bishop '  and  the  Vespers  procession  are 
exactly  described.  As  at  Bayeux  the  boys  take  the  high 
stalls   for    Compline.      The   canon  who   holds   a   particular 

1  'Dum  perventum  fuerit  ad  suis  sociisresumitacapitepsalmum 
ilium  :  Deposuit  potentes,  vadunt  Magnificat,  et  sic  cantant  vesperas 
omnes  ad  medium  ecclesiae  et  ibi  usque  ad  finem.' 
qui  in  processione  stant  ordinate  2  Novus  Ordinarius  of  Coutances 
eumdem  versum,  episcopo  inchoan-  (undated)  in  Gastd,  39. 
te,  plures  replicantes.  Qui  dum  s  '  Post  Matutinas  conveniant 
sic  cantatur,  offert  ipse  episcopus  omnes  pueri  ad  suam  tabulam 
sociissuisdechorobaculumpastora-  faciendam,  quibus  licitum  est  ma- 
lem.Postmultasitaqueresumptiones  iores  personas  Ecclesiae  minoribus 
dicti  versus,  revertuntur  in  chorum,  officiis  deputare.  Diaconis  et  sub- 
TV  Deum  laudamus,  si  habent  diaconis  ordinatis,  thuribula  impo- 
novum  episcopum,  decantantes,  et  nantur  et  candelabra  maiora  vide- 
ita  canendo  deducunt  eum  ad  licet  et  minora.  Episcopo  vero, 
altare,  et  mitra  sibi  imposita  et  cantori  et  aliis  canonicis  aquam, 
baculo  cum  capa  serica,  revertuntur  manutergium,  missale,  ignem  et 
in  chorum,  illo  qui  fuerat  episcopus  campanam  possunt  imponere  pro 
explente  officium  capellani,  creato  suae  libito  voluntatis.  Nihil  tamen 
nihilominus  novo  cantore.  Tunc  inhonestum  aut  impertinens  ap- 
chorus,  si  non  fuerit  ibi  novus  ponatur;  antiquioresprimi  ponantur 
episcopus,  vel  novus  episcopus  qui  in  tabula  et  ultimi  iuniores.' 
baculum  duxerit  capiendum,  cum 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  347 

prebend  is  bound  to  carry  the  candle  and  the  col  Ice  tar  turn 
for  the  '  bishop.'  After  Compline  the  '  bishop '  is  led  home 
with  Laetabundus,  but  not  in  pontificals.  Throughout  the 
services  of  the  following  day  the  '  bishop '  plays  his  part, 
and  when  Vespers  comes  gives  way  to  a  '  bishop  '-elect  at  the 
Deposuit  \  The  '  bishop '  of  St.  Martin  of  Tours  was  in- 
stalled in  the  neighbouring  convent  of  Beaumont,  whither  all 
the  clcriculi  rode  for  the  purpose  after  Prime  on  St.  John's 
day.  He  was  vested  in  the  church  there,  blessed  the  nuns, 
then  returned  to  Tours,  was  installed  in  his  own  cathedral, 
and  blessed  the  populace2.  The  secular  side  of  the  feast 
comes  out  in  the  Toul  Statutes  of  1497  3.  Here  it  may  be 
said  to  have  absorbed  in  its  turn  the  Feast  of  Fools,  for  the 
'  bishop  '  was  a  choir-boy  chosen  by  the  choir-boys  themselves 
and  also  by  the  sub-deacons,  who  shared  with  them  the  name 
of  Innocentes  4.  The  election  took  place  after  Compline  on 
the  first  Sunday  in  Advent,  and  the  '  bishop '  was  enthroned 
with  a  Te  Deum.  He  officiated  in  the  usual  way  throughout 
the  Innocents'  day  services.  In  the  morning  he  rode  at  the 
head  of  a  cortege  to  the  monasteries  of  St.  Mansuetus  and 
St.  Aper,  sang  an  anthem  and  said  a  prayer  at  the  door 
of  each  church,  and  claimed  a  customary  fee5.  After  Vespers 
he  again  rode  in  state  with  mimes  and  trumpeters  through 
the  city  6.     On  the  following  day,  all  the  '  Innocents '  went 

1  '  Quo  facto  dicat  [Episcopus]  feriati,  qui  in  numero  dictorum 
Deposuit.  Statimque  electus  Epi-  Innocentium  computantur.' 
scopus,  tradito  sibi  baculo  pastorali  6  '  Ipsa  autem  die  de  mane  equi- 
a  pueris  ad  altare  praesentetur,  et  tare  habet  idem  episcopus  In- 
osculate altari  in  domum  suam  a  nocentium  ad  monasteria  SS. 
dictis  pueris  deferatur.  Et  interim,  Mansueti  et  Apri  per  civitatem 
finito  tumultu,  eat  processio  ad  transeundo  in  comitiva  suorum 
altare  S.  Thomae  martyris.'  aequalium,   quibus   etiam    maiores 

2  Rituale  (fourteenth  century)  of  et  digniores  personae  dignitatum 
Tours  in  Martene,  iii.  39.  There  comitantur  per  se  vel  suos  servi- 
was  a  cantor  puerorum  as  well  as  tores  et  equos,  et  descendentes 
the  episcopus.  At  second  Vespers  ad  fores  ecclesiarum  praedictarum 
'quando  Magnificat  camtur.  veniunt  intonat  unam  antiphonam  et  dicit 
clericuli  in  choro  cum  episcopo  episcopus  orationem,  sibique  de- 
habentes  candelas  accensas  de  pro-  bentur  a  quolibet  monasteriorum 
prio  et  quando  Deposuit  Canitur,  eorundem  xviij  den.  Tullenses,  qui 
accipit  cantor  puerorum  baculum,  si  illico  non  solvantur,  possunt  ac- 
et  tunc  in  stallo  ascendunt  pueri,  et  cipere  libros  vel  vadia.' 

alii  descendunt.'  6  '  Cantatis  eiusdem  diei  vesperis, 

3  Ducange,  s.  v.  Kalendae.  episcopus  ipse  cum  mimis  et  tubis 

4  '  Omnes    pueri    et    subdiaconi     procedit    per    civitatem    cum    sua 


348  FOLK  DRAMA 

masked  into  the  city,  where,  if  it  was  fine  enough,  farces  and 
apparently  also  moralities  and  miracles  were  played  1.  On 
the  octave  the  '  bishop '  and  his  cortege  went  to  the  church 
of  St.  Genevieve.  After  an  anthem  and  collect  they  adjourned 
to  the  '  church-house,'  where  they  were  entertained  by  the 
hospital  at  a  dessert  of  cake,  apples  and  nuts,  during  which 
they  chose  disciplinary  officers  for  the  coming  year2.  The 
expenses  of  the  feast,  with  the  exception  of  the  dinner  on  the 
day  after  Innocents'  day  which  came  out  of  the  disciplinary 
fines,  are  assigned  by  the  statutes  to  the  canons  in  the  ordeV 
of  their  appointment.  The  responsible  canon  must  give  a 
supper  on  Innocents'  day,  and  a  dessert  out  of  what  is  over 
on  the  following  day.  He  must  also  provide  the  '  bishop ' 
with  a  horse,  gloves,  and  a  biretta  when  he  rides  abroad. 
At  the  supper  a  curious  ceremony  took  place.  The  canon 
returned  thanks  to  the  '  bishop,'  apologized  for  any  short- 
comings in  the  preparations,  and  finally  handed  the  '  bishop  ' 
a  cap  of  rosemary  or  other  flowers,  which  was  then  conferred 
upon  the  canon  to  whose  lot  it  would  fall  to  provide  the  feast 
for  the  next  anniversary3.  Should  the  canon  disregard  his 
duties  the  boys  and  sub-deacons  were  entitled  to  hang  up 
a  black  cope  on  a  candlestick  in  the  middle  of  the  choir 
in  illius  vituperium  for  as  long  as  they  might  choose  4. 

comitiva,   via  qua  fiunt  generales  ecclesia  est  unita,  paraverint  foca- 

processiones.'  pam  unam,  poma,  nuces,   &c.   ad 

1  'In  crastino  Innocentium,  quo  merendam  oportuna ;  et  ibi  insti- 
omnes  vadunt  per  civitatem  post  tuunturofficiarii  ad  marencias  super 
prandium,  faciebus  opertis,  in  diver-  defectibus  aut  excessibus  in  officio 
sis  habitibus,  et  si  quae  farsae  divino  per  totum  annum  com- 
practicari  valeant,  tempore   tamen  missis.' 

sicco,  fiunt  in  aliquibus  locis  civi-  a  '  Fit . . .  assignatio  post  coenam 

tatis,      omnia      cum       honestate.'  diei  Innocentium ;  ita  quod  is  qui 

Another    passage,   referring    more  ilia  die  festum  peregit,  gratias  refert 

generally  to  the  feast,  has  'Fiunt  episcopo  et  toti  comitivae,  ac  ex- 

ibi   moralitates   vel   simulacra  mi-  cusari  petit,  si  in  aliquo  defecit ;  et 

raculorum  cum  farsis  et  similibus  finaliter  pileum  romarini  vel  alterius 

ioculis,  semper  tamen  honestis.'  confectionis    floreum    exhibet    ipsi 

2  '  In  octavis  Innocentium  rursus  episcopo,  ut  tradat  canonico  in  re- 
vadit  episcopus  cum  omni  comitiva  ceptione  sequenti  constituto  ad 
sua  in  habitibus  suis  ad  ecclesiam  futurum  annum  ipsum  festum  agen- 
B.  Genovefae,  ubi  cantata  anti-  dum.'  Cf.  the  bouquets  at  the 
phona  de  ipsavirgine  cum  collecta,  '  defructus'  (p.  324). 

itur  ad   domum   parochialem   eius  *  'Si  autem  facere   contemneret 

ecclesiae  vel  alibi,  ubi  magister  et  adveniente  festo,  suspenderetur 
fratres    domus    Dei,   quibus    ipsa      cappa  nigra  in  raustro  medio  chori, 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


349 


I  cannot  pretend  to  give  a  complete  account  of  all  the 
French  examples  of  the  Boy  Bishop  with  which  I  have 
met,  and  it  is  the  less  necessary,  as  the  feast  seems  to  have 
been  far  more  popular  and  enduring  in  England  than  the 
Feast  of  Fools.  I  content  myself  with  giving  references  for 
its  history  at  Amiens1,  St.  Quentin2,  Senlis3,  Soissons4,  Roye5, 
Peronne6,  Rheims7,  Brussels8,  Lille9,  Liege10,  Laon11,  Troyes12, 
Mans13,  Bourges14,  Chalons-sur-Saone15,  Grenoble16.  Not  un- 
naturally it  proved  less  of  a  scandal  to  ecclesiastical  reformers 
than  the  Feast  of  Fools ;  for  the  choir-boys  must  have  been 
more  amenable  to  discipline,  even  in  moments  of  festivity, 
than  the  adult  clerks.  But  it  shared  in  the  general  condemna- 
tion of  all  such  customs,  and  was  specifically  arraigned  by 
more  than  one  council,  rather  perhaps  for  puerility  than  for 


et    tamdiu    ibi    maneret    in    illius . 
vituperium,  quamdiu  placeret  sub- 
diaconis  feriatis  et  pueris  chori ;  et 
in  ea  re  non  tenerentur  nobis  capi- 
tulo  obedire.' 

1  Amiens:  Rigollot,  13  and  pas- 
sim ;  cf.  p.  339. 

2  St.  Quentin :  Rigollot,  32 ; 
Grenier,  360. 

3  Senlis  :  Rigollot,  26  ;  Grenier, 
360. 

*  Soissons :  Matton,  Archives  de 
Soissons,  75. 

s  Roye :    Rigollot,  33  ;   Grenier, 

359- 

6  Peronne  :  Rigollot,  34 ;  Gre- 
nier, 359,  413. 

7  Rheims  :  Rigollot,  50  ;  Petit 
de  Julleville,  Re'p.  Com.  348  ;  Mar- 
lot,  Hist,  de  Rheims,  ii.  266.  In 
1479  the  chapter  undertook  the 
expense,  '  modo  fiat  sine  larvis  et 
strepitu  tubicinis,  ac  sine  equita- 
tione  per  villain.'  Martene,  iii.  40, 
says  that  there  is  no  trace  of  any  of 
the  triduum  ceremonies  in  the  early 
thirteenth-century  Rheims  Ordi- 
narium. 

8  Brussels :  Laborde,  Dues  de 
Bourgogne,  ii.  2.  286  '[1378]  Item 
xxi  decembris  episcopo  scholarium 
sanctae  Gudilae  profecto  Sancti 
Nycolay  quod  scholares  annuatim 
faciunt  \\  mutfones].' 

9  Lille:  E.  Hautcoeur,  Hist,  de 


Saint- Pierre  de  Lille,  ii.  217,  223. 
On  June  29,  1501,  Guillemot  de 
Lespine  'tr^passa  dveque  des  Inno- 
cens.'  His  epitaph  is  in  the  cloister 
gallery  (Hautcoeur,  Doc.  liturg.  de 
S.  P.  de  Lille,  342). 

10  Liege  :  Rigollot,  42  ;  Diirr,  82. 
A  statute  of  1 330  laid  the  expense 
on  the  last  admitted  canon  '  nisi 
canonicus  scholaris  sub  virga  exi- 
stens  ipsum  exemerit.' 

11  Laon  :  Rigollot,  21  ;  Grenier, 
356,  413  ;  C.  Hide",  Bull,  de  la  Soc. 
acad.  de  Laon,  xiii.  122  ;  E.  Fleury, 
Cinquante  Ans  de  Laon,  52.  A 
chapter  act  of  1546  states  that 
the  custom  of  playing  a  comedy  at 
the  election  of  the  Boy  Bishop  on 
St.  Eloi's  day  (Dec.  1)  has  ceased. 
The  Mass  is  not  to  be  disturbed, 
but  '  si  les  escoliers  veulent  faire 
un  petit  discours,  il  seroit  entendu 
avec  plaisir.' 

12  Troyes :  T.  Boutiot,  Hist,  de 
Troyes,  iii.  20. 

13  Mans:  Gasti,  43;  Julleville, 
Les  Com.  38. 

14  Bourges  :  Martene,  iii.  40. 

15  Chalons-sur-Saone:  DuTilliot, 
20  ;    C.   Perry,   Hist,  de    Chalons 

(1659).  435- 

14  Grenoble  :    Pilot   de   Thorey, 

Usages,  Fetes  et  Coutumes  en  Dau- 

phine',  i.  181. 


350 


FOLK  DRAMA 


any  graver  offence 1.  Gradually  therefore,  it  vanished,  leaving 
only  a  few  survivals  to  recent  centuries  2.  As  was  the  case 
with  the  Feast  of  Fools,  the  question  of  its  suppression  some- 
times set  a  chapter  by  the  ears.  Notably  was  this  so  at 
Noyon,  where  the  act  of  his  reforming  colleagues  in  1622  was 
highly  disapproved  of  by  the  dean,  Jacques  Le  Vasseur.'  In 
a  letter  written  on  the  occasion  he  declares  that  the  Boy 
Bishop  had  flourished  in  Noyon  cathedral  for  four  hundred 
years,  and  brands  the  reformers  as  brute  beasts  masquerading 
in  the  robes  and  beards  of  philosophy  3. 

I  have  no  special  records  of  the  Boy  Bishop  in  Spain  except 
the  council  decrees  already  quoted.  In  Germany  he  appears 
to  have  been  more  widely  popular  than  his  rival  of  Fools.  My 
first  notice,  however,  is  two  centuries  after  the  visit  of  Conrad 
to  the  triduum  at  St.  Gall.  The  chronicle  of  the  monastery  of 
St.  Petersburg,  hard  by  Halle,  mentions  an  accident  in  ludo  qui 
vocatur  puerorum,  by  which  a  lad  was  trodden  to  death.  This 
was  in  11374.     The  thirteenth  and  fourteenth  centuries  yield 

lemy,  v.  334) ;  at  Sens,  in  the  nine- 
teenth, the  choir-boys  still  play  at 
being  bishops  on  Innocents'  day, 
and  name  the  'archbishop'  tine 
(CheYest,  81). 

3  Grenier,  358,  quoting  Le  Vas- 
seur, Efiistolae,  Cent.  ii.  Epist.  68  ; 
cf.  on  the  Noyon  feast,  Leach,  135  ; 
Du  Tilliot,  17  ;  Rigollot,  27  ;  L. 
Maziere,  Noyon  religieux,  in 
Comptes-Rendus  et  Memoires,  xi. 
9I)  of  The  Comite  arch,  et  hist,  de 
Noyon.  Le  Vasseur,  an  ex-Rector 
of  the  University  of  Paris,  writes  to 
Francois  Geuffrin  '  ecce  ludunt 
etiam  ante  ipsas  aras  ;  internecio- 
nem  detestamur,  execramur  carni- 
ficem.  Ludunt  et  placet  iste  ludus 
ecclesiae.  .  .  .  Tarn  grandis  est  natu 
ritus  iste,  quem  viguisse  deprehendo 
iam  ante  quadringentos  annos  in 
hac  aede,  magno  totius  orbis  ordi- 
num  et  aetatum  plausu  fructuque 
.  .  .  O  miserum  saeculum !  .  .  .  solo 
gestu  externoque  habitu  spectabiles, 
sola  barba  et  pallio  philosophi,cae- 
tera  pecudes ! ' 

4  Chronicon  Montis  Sereni  in 
Pertz,  Scriptores,  xxiii.  144. 


1  C.  of  Cognac  (1260) ,  c.  2  (Mansi, 
xxiii.  1033)  '  cum  in  balleatione 
quae  in  festo  SS.  Innocentium  in 
quibusdam  Ecclesiis  fieri  inolevit, 
multae  rixae,  contentiones  et  tur- 
bationes,  tarn  in  divinis  officiis  quam 
aliis  consueverint  provenire,  prae- 
dictas  balleationes  ulterius  sub  inti- 
matione  anathematis  fieri  prohibe- 
mus ;  nee  non  et  Episcopos  in 
praedicto  festo  creari  ;  cum  hoc  in 
ecclesia  Dei  ridiculum  existat,  et 
hoc  dignitatis  episcopalis  ludibrio 
fiat.'  C.  of  Salzburg  (1274),  c.  17 
(Labbe\  xi.  1004)  'ludi  noxii  quos 
vulgaris  elocutio  Eptus  puor.  appel- 
lat ' ;  CC.  of  Chartres  (1526  and 
1575  ;  Bochellus,  Deer.  Eccl.  Gall. 
iv.  7.  46 ;  Du  Tilliot,  66)  '  stultum 
aut  ridiculum  in  ecclesia'  on  days 
of  SS.  Nicholas  and  Catharine,  and 
the  Innocents  ;  C.  of  Toledo  (1565), 
ii.  21  (Labbe",  xv.  764)  '  ficta  ilia  et 
puerilis  episcopatus  electio  ' ;  C.  of 
Rouen  (1581  ;  Hardouin,  Concilia, 
x.  1217)  'in  festivitate  SS.  Inno- 
centium theatralia.' 

2  There  are  traces  of  it  in  the 
eighteenth  century  at  Lyons  (Mar- 
tene,  iii.  40)  and  Rheims  (Barthe- 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  351 

more  examples.  In  1249  Pope  Innocent  IV  complained  to 
the  bishop  of  Ratisbon  that  the  clerks  and  scholars  of  that 
cathedral,  when  choosing  their  anniversary  '  bishop,'  did 
violence  to  the  abbey  of  Pruviningen  *.  In  1357  the  Ratisbon 
feast  was  stained  with  homicide,  and  was  consequently  sup- 
pressed2. In  1282  the  feast  was  forbidden  at  Eichstadt  3. 
In  1304  it  led  to  a  dispute  between  the  municipality  and  the 
chapter  of  Hamburg,  which  ended  in  a  promise  by  the 
scholares  to  refrain  from  defamatory  songs  either  in  Latin 
or  German4.  Similarly  at  Worms  in  1307  the  pneri  were 
forbidden  to  sing  in  the  streets  after  Compline,  as  had  been 
the  custom  on  the  feasts  of  St.  Nicholas  and  St.  Lucy,  on 
Christmas  and  the  three  following  days,  and  on  the  octave  of 
the  Holy  Innocents' 5.  At  Lubeck  the  feast  was  abolished  in 
1336 6.  I  have  already  quoted  the  long  reference  to  the 
scholarium  episcopus  in  the  Mosburg  Gradual  of  13607.  He 
may  be  traced  also  at  Regensburg  8  and  at  Prague  9.  But  the 
fullest  account  of  him  is  from  Mainz  10.  Here  he  was  called 
the  Schtd-Bischojf,  and  in  derision  Apffeln-Bischoff.  He  was 
chosen  before  St.  Nicholas'  day  by  the  ludi  magister  of  the 
schola  trivialis.  He  had  his  equites,  his  capellani,  and  his 
pedelli.  On  St.  Nicholas'  day,  and  on  that  of  the  Holy 
Innocents',  he  had  a  seat  near  the  high  altar,  and  took  part 
in  the  first  and  second  Vespers.  In  the  interval  he  paid  a 
visit  with  his  company  to  the  palace  of  the  elector,  sang 
a  hymn  n,  and  claimed  a  banquet  or  a  donation.    The  custom 

1  Monum.  Bote.  xiii.  214,  quoted  thirteenth  century  a  child-abbot 
by  Specht,  228  '  in  festo  nativitatis  was  chosen  in  Hamburg  on  St. 
Dominicae  annuatim  sibi  ludendo  Andrew's  day  (Nov.  30).  On  St. 
constituentes  episcopum.'  Nicholas'  day  (Dec.  6)  he  gave  way 

2  Vitus  Arnpekius,  Chron.  Baio-  to  a  child-bishop,  who  remained  in 
ariorum,  v.  53,  cited  by  Martene,  office  until  Dec.  28  (Tille,  D.  W. 
iii.  40.  31,   citing   Beneke,  Hamburgische 

3  Specht,  228.  Geschichte  und  Sagen,  90). 

4  Ibid.  225  ;  Creizenach,  i.  391  ;  6  Specht,  229. 
both  quoting  E.  Meyer,  Gesch.  des  6  Ibid.  228. 
hamburgischen  Schul-  und  Unter-  7  Cf.  p.  319. 
richtswesens    im    Mittelalter,    197  8  Tille,  D.  W.  31. 
'  praeterea  scholares  nunquam,  sive  9  Ibid.  299. 

in    electione     sive     extra,    aliquos  10  Diirr,  67,  quoting  a  Ritual  of 

rhythmos   faciant,   tarn    in    latino,  the  cathedral  ('  tempore  Alberti '). 
quam  in  teutonico,  qui  famam  ali-  n  It  began  : 

cuius   valeant  maculare.'      In   the         '  lam  tuum  festum  Nicolae  dives 


352  FOLK  DRAMA 

was  not  altogether  extinct  in  Mainz  by  17791.  In  other 
German  towns,  also,  it  well  out-lived  the  Middle  Ages.  At 
Cologne,  for  instance,  it  was  only  suppressed  by  the  statutes 
of  Bishop  Max  Heinrich  in  1662  2. 

In  England,  the  Boy  Bishop  weathered  the  storms  of 
discipline  which  swept  away  the  Feast  of  Fools  in  the 
thirteenth  and  fourteenth  centuries.  He  was  widely  popular 
in  the  later  Middle  Ages,  and  finally  fell  before  an  austerity 
of  the  Reformation.  The  prerogative  instance  of  the  custom 
is  in  the  church  f  Salisbury.  Here  the  existence  of  the 
Boy  Bishop  is  already  implied  by  the  notice  of  a  ring  for 
use  at  the  'Feast  of  Boys'  in  an  inventory  of  1222  3.  A 
century  later,  the  statutes  of  Roger  de  Mortival  in  131 9 
include  elaborate  regulations  for  the  ceremony.  The  ' bishop* 
may  perform  the  officiuni  as  is  the  use,  but  he  must  hold 
no  banquet,  and  no  visitation  either  within  or  without  the 
cathedral.  He  may  be  invited  to  the  table  of  a  canon,  but 
otherwise  he  must  remain  in  the  common  house,  and  must 
return  to  his  duties  in  church  and  school  immediately  after 
the  feast  of  Innocents.  The  statute  also  regulates  the 
behaviour  of  the  crowds  which  were  wont  to  press  upon  and 
impede  the  boys  in  their  annual  procession  to  the  altar  of 
the  Holy  Trinity,  and  the  rest  of  their  ministry  4.     Two  of  the 

more  solemni  recolit  iuventus,  bus  et  collectis  Sacerdotum,  Diaco- 

nec    tibi     dignas,     sacerdotum  norum   aut  Subdiaconorum   officia 

Caesar,  quaedam   usurpent ;    multo  minus 

promere  laudes.'  convenit  ut  Canonici  aut  Vicarii  ex 

1  Tille,  D.  IV.  31,  citing  Nork,  collegarum  suorum  numero  aliquem 
Feslkalender,  783.  Dtirr's  tract  designent  Episcopum  qui  reliquos 
was  published  at  Mainz  in  1755.  omnes    magnis    impendiis   liberali 

2  Wetzer  und  Welte,  s.  v.  Feste  convivio  excipiat.' 

'  consuetudo  seu  potius  detestabilis  s  W.  H.  R.  Jones,  Vetus  Registr. 
corruptela,  quapueri  a  die  S.  Nicolai  Sarisb.  (R.  S.),  ii.  128;  Words- 
usque  ad  festum  SS.  Innocentium  worth,  Proc.  170  'Item,  annulus 
personatum  Episcopum  colunt  .  .  .  unus  aureus  ad  Festum  Puero- 
ea  puerilibus  levitatibus  et  ineptiis  rum.' 

plena    coeperit     esse     multumque  *  Constitutiones,  §  45  (Jones  and 

gravitatis  et  decoris  divinis  detrahat  Dayman,  Sarunt  Statutes,  75  ;    cf. 

officiis  .  .  .  ne  clerus  se  pueris  die  Jones,   Fasti,    295)    '  Electus  puer 

SS.  Inn.  submittat  ac  eorum  locum  chorista  in  episcopum  modo  solito 

occupet,  aut  illis  functiones  aliquas  puerili  officium  in    ecclesia,  prout 

in  divinis  officiis  permittat,  neque  fieri  consuevit,  licenter  exequatur, 

praesentes  aliquis  Episcopus  bene-  convivium  aliquod  de  caetero,  vel 

dictiones   faciat,    aliique    pueri    in  visitationem    exterius   seu    interius 

cantandis  horariis  precibus  lectioni-  nullatenus  faciendo,  sed  in   domo 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  353 

great  service-books  of  the  Sarum  use,  the  Breviary  and  the 
Processional,  give  ample  details  as  to  the  'ministry'  of  the  Boy 
Bishop  and  his  fellows.  The  office,  as  preserved  in  these, 
will  be  found  in  an  appendix1.  The  proceedings  differ  in 
some  respects  from  the  continental  models  already  described. 
There  is  no  mention  of  the  Deposnit;  and  the  central  rite 
is  still  the  great  procession  between  Vespers  and  Compline  on 
the  eve  of  the  Holy  Innocents.  This  procession  went  from 
the  choir  either  to  the  altar  of  the  Holy  Innocents  or  to  that 
of  the  Holy  Trinity  and  All  Saints  in  the  Lady  chapel,  and 
at  its  return  the  boys  took  the  higher  stalls  and  kept  them 
until  the  second  Vespers  of  the  feast.  For  this  procession  the 
boys  were  entitled  to  assign  the  functions  of  carrying  the 
book,  the  censer,  the  candles,  and  so  forth  to  the  canons. 
Some  miscellaneous  notices  of  the  Salisbury  feast  are  con- 
tained in  the  chapter  register  between  1387  and  1473.  From 
1387  the  oblations  on  the  feast  appear  to  have  been  given  to 
the  'bishop.'  In  1413  he  was  allowed  a  banquet.  In  1448 
the  precentor,  Nicholas  Upton,  proposed  that  the  boys,  instead 
of  freely  electing  a  '  bishop,'  should  be  confined  to  a  choice 
amongst  three  candidates  named  by  the  chapter.  But  this 
innovation  was  successfully  resisted  2.  Cathedral  documents 
also  give  the  names  of  twenty-one  boys  who  held  the  office  3. 
There  is  in  Salisbury  cathedral  a  dwarf  effigy  of  a  bishop, 
dating  from  the  latter  part  of  the  thirteenth  century.     Local 

communi   cum   sociis   conversetur,  mus  incurrere  ipso  facto,  inhibemus 

nisi  cum  ut  choristam  ad  domum  ne  quis  pueros  illos  in  praefata  pro- 

canonici  causa  solatii  ad  mensam  cessione  vel  alias  in  suo  ministerio 

contigerit     evocari,    ecclesiam     et  premat  vel  impediat  quoquomodo, 

scholas  cum  caeteris  choristis  statim  quominus  pacifice  valeant  facere  et 

post  festum  Innocentium  frequen-  exequi  quod   illis   imminet   facien- 

tando.       Et    quia    in    processione  dum ;    sed   qui   eidem   processioni 

quam  ad  altare  Sanctae  Trinitatis  devotionis  causa  voluerint  interesse, 

faciunt   annuatim   pueri  supradicti  ita    modo    maturo    se   habeant  et 

per  concurrentium  pressuras  et  alias  honeste  sicut  et  in  aliis  processioni- 

dissolutiones   multiplices    nonnulla  bus  dictae  ecclesiae  se  habent  qui 

damna  personis  et  ecclesiae  gravia  ad  honorem  Dei  frequentant  quando 

intelleximus  priscis  temporibus  per-  que  ecclesiam  supradictam.' 

venisse,  ex  parte  Dei  omnipotentis  l  Appendix  M. 

et  sub  poena  maioris  excommunica-  2  Jones,  Fasti,  299. 

tionis,  quam  contravenientes  utpote  s  Wordsworth,  Proc.  259.     The 

libertates   dictae  ecclesiae  nostrae  oblationes  vary  from  W\s.  v\\\d.  in 

infringentes  et  illius  pacem  et  quie-  1448  to  as  much  as  lxxxixy.  xid.  in 

tern  temerarie  perturbantes  declara-  1456. 

CHAMBERS.    I  A    a 


354  FOLK  DRAMA 

tradition,   from    at    least   the   beginning   of  the  seventeenth 
century,  has  regarded  this  as  the  monument  of  a  Boy  Bishop 
who  died  during  his  term  of  office.    But  modern  archaeologists 
repudiate  the  theory.     Such  miniature  effigies  are  not   un- 
common, and  possibly  indicate  that  the  heart  alone  of  the 
person  commemorated  is  buried  in  the  spot  which  they  mark1. 
The  gradual  adoption  of  the  use  of  Sarum  by  other  dioceses 
would  naturally  tend  to  carry  with  it  that  of  the  Boy  Bishop. 
But  he  is  to  be  found  at  Exeter  and  at   St.  Paul's  before 
the  change  of  use,  as  well  as  at  Lincoln   and  York  which 
retained  their  own  uses  up  to  the  Reformation.     At  Exeter 
Bishop  Grandisson's  Ordinate  of  1337  provides  an  Officium 
puerorum   for  the   eve    and    day   of   the    Innocents    which, 
with  different  detail,  is  on  the  same  general  lines  as  that  of 
Salisbury2.     At    St.  Paul's   there  was  a  Boy  Bishop  about 
1225,  when  a  gift  was  made  to  him  of  a  mitre  by  John  de 
Belemains,  prebendary  of  Chiswick.    This  appears,  with  other 
vestments  for  the  feast,  in  an  inventory  drawn  up  some  twenty 
years  later3.     By  1263  abuses  had  grown  up,  and  the  chapter 
passed  a  statute  to  reform  them  4.   They  required  the  election 
of  the  praesid  and  his  chapter  and  the  drawing  up  of  the 
tabula  to  take  place  in  the  chapter-house  instead  of  in  the 
cathedral,  on  account  of  the  irreverence  of  the  crowds  pressing 
to  see.     The  great  dignitaries  must  not  be  put  down  on  the 
tabula  for  the  servers'  functions,  but  only  the  clergy  of  the 
second  or  third (  form.'  The  procession  and  all  the  proceedings 
in  the  cathedral  must  be  orderly  and  creditable  to  the  boys5. 

1  Jones,  Fasti,  300  ;  Rimbault,  for  the  Boy  Bishop  (Simpson,  St. 
xxvni;  Planche,  \n  Journal  of  Brit.  Paul's  Cathedral  and  Old  City 
Archaeol.Assoc.-xv.123.    Gregory,      Life,  40). 

93,  gives  a  cut  of  the  statue.  *  Statutes,  bk.  i,  pars  vi.  c.  9,  De 

2  Ordinate  secundum  [/sum  officio  puerorum  in  festo  Sanctorum 
Exon.  (ed.  H.  E.  Reynolds),  f.  30.        Innocencium  (W.  S.Simpson,  Regi- 

8  Archaeologia,   1.  446,  472  sqq.  strum  Statutorum  et   Consuetudi- 

( Invent,  of  1245)  'mitra  alia  alba  num  Ecclesiae  Cathedralis  Sancti 

addubbata    aurifrigio,    plana    est;  Fault  Londinensis,  91). 

quam  dedit  J.  Belemains  episcopo  5  '  Memorandum,     quod      Anno 

innocentum  .  .  .  Mitra  episcopi  in-  Domini  Millesimo  cc  Ixjij.  tempore 

nocentum,   nullius  precii  .  .  .  Capa  G.  de  fferring,  Decani,  ordinatum 

et    mantella  puerorum   ad    festum  fuit  de  officio  Puerorum  die  Sancto- 

Innocentumet  Stultorum  [cf.  p.  323]  rum   Innocencium,  prout  sequitur. 

sunt  xxviij  debiles  et  contritae.'    In  Provida   fuit  ab  antiquis   patribus 

1402  there  were   two  little  staves  predecessoribus    nostris    delibera- 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


355 


Minute  directions  follow  as  to  the  right  of  the  c  bishop '  to 
claim  a  supper  on  the  eve  from  one  of  the  canons,  and  as  to 
the  train  he  may  take  with  him,  as  well  as  for  the  dinner  and 
supper  of  the  feast-day  itself.  After  dinner  a  cavalcade  is  to 
start  from  the  cathedral  for  the  blessing  of  the  people.  The 
dean  must  find  a  horse  for  the  '  bishop,'  and  each  canon 
residentiary  one  for  the  lad  who  personates  him  l.  Other 
statutes  of  earlier  date  make  it  incumbent  on  a  new  residen- 
tiary to  entertain  his  own  boy-representative  cum  daunsa  et 
chorea  et  torchiis  on  Innocents'  day,  and  to  sit  up  at  night  for 
the  '  bishop  '  and  all  his  cortege  on  the  octave.  If  he  is  kept 
up  very  late,  he  may  'cut'  Matins  next  morning2.  The  Boy 
Bishop  of  St.  Paul's  was  accustomed  to  preach  a  sermon 
which,  not  unnaturally,  he  did  not  write  himself.  William  de 
Tolleshunte,  almoner  of  St.  Paul's  in  1329,  bequeathed  to  the 
almonry   copies   of  all   the   sermons   preached  by   the  Bo'y 


cione  statutum,  ut  in  sollennitate 
Sanctorum  Innocencium,  qui  pro 
Innocente  Christo  sanguinem  suum 
fuderunt,  innocens  puer  Presulatus 
officio  fungeretur,  ut  sic  puer  pueris 
preesset,  et  innocens  innocentibus 
imperaret,  illius  tipum  tenens  in 
Ecclesia,  quem  sequuntur  iuvenes, 
quocumque  ierit.  Cum  igitur  quod 
ad  laudem  lactencium  fuit  adinven- 
tum,  conversum  sit  in  dedecus,  et 
in  derisum  decoris  Domus  Dei, 
propter  insolenciam  effrenatae  mul- 
titudinis  subsequentis  eundem,  et 
affluentis  improborum  turbae  pacem 
Praesulis  exturbantis,  statuendum 
duximus  ut  praedicti  pueri,  tarn  in 
eligendo  suo  Pontifice  et  personis 
dignitatum  Decani,  Archidiaco- 
norum,  et  aliorum,  necnon  et  Stacio- 
nariorum,  antiquum  suum  ritum 
observent,  tabulam  suam  faciant,  et 
legant  in  Capitulo.  Hoc  tamen 
adhibito  moderamine,  ut  nullum 
decetero  de  Canonicis  Maioribus 
vel  Minoribus  ad  candelabra,  vel 
turribulum,  vel  ad  aliqua  obsequia 
eiusdem  Ecclesiae,  vel  ipsius  Ponti- 
ficis  dcputent  in  futurum,  set  suos 
eligant  ministeriales  de  illis  qui  sunt 
in  secunda  forma  vel  in  tercia.  Pro- 
cessionem  suam  habeant  honestam, 
tarn    in    incessu,  quam    habitu   et 

A  a  2 


cantu,  competenti ;  ita  vero  se 
gerant  in  omnibus  in  Ecclesia,  quod 
clerus  et  populus  illos  habeant  re- 
commendatos.' 

1 '  Die  vero  solemnitatis  post  pran- 
dium  admandatum  personae  Decani 
convenient  omnes  in  atrio  Ecclesiae, 
ibidem  equos  ascendant  ituri  ad 
populum  benedicendum.  Tenetur 
autem  Decanus  Presuli  presentare 
equum,  et  quilibet  Stacionarius  sua 
personae  in  equo  providere.' 

2  Statutes,  bk.  i,  pars  vii.  c.  6 
(Simpson,  op.  cit.  129),  a  statute 
made  in  the  time  of  Dean  Ralph 
de  Diceto  (n8i-ti204)  'Debet 
eciam  novus  Residenciarius  post 
cenam  die  Sanctorum  Innocencium 
ducere  puerum  suum  cum  daunsa  et 
chorea  et  torchiis  ad  Elemosinariam, 
et  ibi  cum  torticiis  potum  et  species 
singulis  ministrare,  et  liberatam  vini 
cervisiaeet  specierum  et  candcllarum 
facere,  et  ibidem  ministri  sui  expe- 
ctare,  quousque  alius  puer  Canonici 
senioris  veniat.  Et  secundam 
cenam  in  octavis  Innocencium  tene- 
bit,  Episcopum  cum  pueris  et  eorum 
comitiva  pascendo,  et  in  recessu 
dona  dando,  et,  si  diu  expectat 
adventum  illorum  nocte  ilia,  ad 
matutinos  non  teneatur  venire.' 


356  FOLK  DRAMA 

Bishops  in  his  time.  Probably  he  was  himself  responsible  for 
them  *.  One  such  sermon  was  printed  by  Wynkyn  de  Worde 
before  1500 2.  Another  was  written  by  Erasmus,  and  exists 
both  in  Latin  and  English  3.  When  Dean  Colet  drew  up  the 
statutes  of  St.  Paul's  School  in  1512  he  was  careful  to  enact 
that  the  scholars  should  attend  the  cathedral  on  Childermass 
day,  hear  the  sermon,  and  mass,and  give  a  penny  to  the '  bishop  *.' 
The  earliest  notice  of  the  Boy  Bishop  at  York,  or  for  the 
matter  of  that,  in  England,  is  in  a  statute  (before  1221),  which 
lays  on  him  the  duty  of  finding  rushes  for  the  Nativity  and 
Epiphany  feasts  5.  After  this,  there  is  nothing  further  until 
the  second  half  of  the  fourteenth  century,  when  some  interest- 
ing documents  become  available.  The  chapter  register  for 
1367  requires  that  in  future  the  'bishop'  shall  be  the  boy 
who  has  served  longest  and  proved  most  useful  in  the 
cathedral.  A  saving  clause  is  added :  dum  tamen  compe- 
tenter  sit  corpore  formosus  6.  This  shows  a  sense  of  humour 
in  the  chapter,  for  at  York,  as  at  Salisbury,  Corpore  enim 
formosus  es,  O  jili  was  a  respond  for  the  day.  In  1390,  was 
added  a  further  qualification  that  the  '  bishop '  must  be  a  lad  in 
good  voice  7.  Doubtless  the  office  was  much  coveted,  for  it 
was  a  very  remunerative  one.     The  visitation   forbidden  at 

1  Rimbault,  xxxii.  of  them  offre  a  id.  to  the  Childe  Bis- 

2  Printed  in  Rimbault,  I.     Duff,      shopp;  and  with  theme  the  Maisters 
Handlists,  ii.  5,  notes  also  a  Sermo      and  surveyours  of  the  scole.' 

Pro  episcopo  puerorum  by  J.  Alcock,  5  Lincoln  Statutes,  ii.  98 '  Inveniet 

printed,  in,  the  fifteenth  century  by  [thesaurarius]  Stellas  cum  omnibus 

R.  Pynson.  ad  illas  pertinentibus,  prefer  cirpos, 

3  Concio  de  puero  lesu  pronun-  quos  inveniet  Episcopus  Puerorum 
data  a  puero  in  nova  schola  futurorum  [Pfatuorum],  vnam  in 
lohannis  Coleti  per  eum  instituta  nocte  Natalis  Domini  pro  pastori- 
Londini  in  qua  praesidet  imago  bus  et  -ijas  in  nocte  Epiphanie,  si  de- 
Pueri  lesu  docentis  specie  (Erasmi  beat  fieri  presentacio  -iijum  regum.' 
Opera  (1704),  v.  599).  The  English  6  Warton,  iv.  224  '  Ioannes  de 
version  was  printed  by  W.  Redman  Quixly  confirmatur  Episcopus  Pue- 
(Lupton, Life  oj Colet,  176).  It  is  not  rorum,  et  Capitulum  ordinavit,  quod 
clear  that  this  Concio  was  preached  electio  Episcopi  Puerorum  in  eccle- 
by  a  boy  bishop,  for  Colet's  school  sia  Eboracensi  de  cetero  fieret  de 
(cf.  next  note)  attended  the 'bishop'  eo,  qui  diutius  et  magis  in  dicta 
of  St.  Paul's  song-school.  ecclesialaboraverit,et magis  idoneus 

*  Lupton,  op.  cit.  175  'Alle  these  repertus  fuerit,  dum  tamen  compe- 

Chyldren  shall  every  Chyldremasse  tenter  sit  corpore  formosus,  et  quod 

day  come  to  paulis  Church  and  here  aliter  facta  electio  non  valebit.' 

the  Chylde  Bisshoppis  sermon,  and  7  Warton,  iv.  237  '  nisi  habuerit 

after  be  at  the  hye  masse,  and  eche  claram  vocem  puerilem.' 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  357 

Salisbury  by  Roger  de  Mortival  was  permitted  at  York,  and 
the  profits  were  considerable.  Robert  de  Holme,  who  was 
'bishop'  in  1369,  received  from  the  choirmaster,  John  Gisson, 
who  acted  as  his  treasurer,  no  less  a  sum  than  £3  155-.  lhd.1 
In  1396  the  amount  was  only  £2  os.  6\d.  But  this  was  only 
a  small  portion  of  the  total  receipts.  The  complete  Computus 
for  this  year  happens  to  be  preserved,  and  shows  that  the  Boy 
Bishop  made  a  quite  at  intervals  during  the  weeks  between 
Christmas  and  Candlemas,  travelling  with  a  'seneschal,'  four 
singers  and  a  servant  to  such  distant  places  as  Bridlington, 
Leeds,  Beverley,  Fountains  abbey  and  Allerton.  Their 
principal  journey  lasted  a  fortnight.  The  oblations  on  Christ- 
mas and  Innocents'  days  and  the  collection  from  the  dignitaries 
in  the  cloister  realized  £2  i$s.  $d.  In  the  city  they  got  10s. 
and  abroad  £$  10s.  Out  of  this  there  were  heavy  expenses. 
The  supper  given  by  the  '  bishop  '  cost  i$s.  6\d.  Purchased 
meals  had  to  supplement  hospitality  at  home  and  abroad. 
Horse  hire  and  stable  expenses  had  to  be  met.  There  were 
the  c  bishop's '  outfit,  candles  to  be  borne  in  procession,  fees  to 
the  minor  cathedral  officials,  gloves  for  presents  to  the  vicars 
and  schoolmasters.  There  was  the  'bishop's '  own  company  to 
be  rewarded  for  its  services.  The  £2  os.  6\d.  represents  the 
balance  available  for  his  private  use2.  The  most  generous 
contributor  to  the  quite  was  the  countess  of  Northumberland, 
who  gave  20s.  and  a  gold  ring.  This  is  precisely  the  amount 
of  the  reward  prescribed  about  1522  for  the '  barne  bishop'  of 
York,  as  well  as  for  his  brother  of  Beverley  in  the  Household 
Book  of  the  fifth  earl  of  Northumberland3. 

The  printed  service-books  of  the  use  of  York  do  not 
deal  as  fully  with  the  Feast  of  Boys  as  do  those  of  Sarum  ; 
but  a  manuscript  missal  of  the  fifteenth  century  used  in  the 
cathedral  itself  contains  some  additional  rubrics  with  regard 
to  the  functions  of  the  '  bishop '  and  his  '  precentor '  at 
Mass 4.      The   names   of  some   of  the   York   '  bishops '    are 

1  Warton,  iv.  224.  bus    pueris    in    Capis,  Praccentor 

2  Appendix  M.  Cf.  Rimbault,  xi,  illorum  incipiat.'  There  are  some 
for  further  elucidations  of  the  Com-  responds  for  the  '  Praecentor'  and 
fiutus.  the    '  turba   puerorum.'      After  the 

3  Percy,  North.  H.  B.  340.  Kyrie,  '  omnibus   pueris    in   medio 

4  York  Missal,  i.  23.  The  rubric  Chori  stantibus  et  ibi  omnia  can- 
at  the  beginning  of  Mass  is 'Omni-     tantibus,  Episcopo   eorum   interim 


358 


FOLK  DRAMA 


preserved,  and  show  that  the  ceremony  prevailed  up  to  the 
Reformation  1.  And  this  is  confirmed  by  a  list  of  ornaments 
for  the  '  bishop '  in  a  sixteenth-century  inventory  2. 

I  am  unable  to  give  such  full  data  for  Lincoln  as  for  the 
cathedrals  already  named  ;  but  regulations  of  1300  and  1527 
provide  for  the  supply  of  candles  to  the  '  bishop '  and  the 
rest  of  the  choir  at  Vespers  on  the  eve  and  matins  on  the 
day  of  the  Innocents3,  and  an  inventory  of  1536  mentions 
a  cope  for  the  '  barne  busshop  '  with  a  moral  '  scriptur ' 
embroidered  on  it4.  Nor  can  I  hope  to  supply  any  exhaustive 
list  of  localities  where  the  Boy  Bishop  flourished.  These 
include  minor  cathedrals  such  as  Hereford 5,  Lichfield 6, 
Gloucester 7,  and  Norwich  8,  great  collegiate  churches  such 
as  Beverley  minster  9,  St.  Peter's,  Canterbury 10,  and  Ottery 
in  cathedra  sedente  ;  et  si  Dominica      this  scriptur  "the  hye  wey  ys  best".' 


fuerit,  dicitur  ab  Episcopo  stante  in 
cathedra  Gloria  in  excelsis  Deo : 
aliter  non.'  •  The  Sequentia  for  the 
day  is 

'  Celsa  pueri  concrepent  melodia, 
eia,    Innocentum    colentes    tri- 
pudia,  &c.' 

1  Rimbault,  xvi.  The  dates  are 
between  1416  and  1537. 

2  Raine,  Fabric  Rolls  of  York 
Minster  (Surtees  Soc),  213  sqq. 
(tl5oo,  the  additions  in  brackets 
being  tl5io) '  una  mitra  parva  cum 
petris  pro  episcopo  puerorum  ,  .  . 
[unus  annulus  pro  episcopo  puero- 
rum et  duo  owchys,  unus  in  medio 
ad  modum  crucis  cum  lapidibus  in 
circumferenciis  cum  alio  parvo  cum 
uno  lapide  in  medio  vocato  turchas] 
.  .  .  Capae  Rubiae  .  .  .Una  capa  de 
tyssue  pro  Episcopo  puerili  .  .  . 
[duae  capae  veteres  olim  pro  Epi- 
scopo puerorum].'  Leach,  132,  says 
'At  York,  in  1 32 I,  the  Master  of 
the  Works  gave  "a  gold  ring  with 
a  great  stone  for  the  Bishop  of 
the  Innocents."  In  1491  the  Boy 
Bishop's  pontifical  was  mended 
with  silver-gilt.' 

3  Lincoln  Statutes,  i.  290  {Black 
Book,  11300)  ;  ii.  ccxxxi. 

4  Archacologia,  liii.  25,  50;  Mo- 
nasticon,  viii.  1282  '  Item,  a  coope 
of  Rede  velvett  w*  Rolles  &  clowdes 
ordenyd  for  the  barne  busshop  w* 


The   entry  is   repeated   in   a  later 
inventory  of  1548. 

6  Hereford,  Consuetudines  of 
thirteenth  century  {Lincoln  Statutes, 
ii.  67)  'Thesaurarius  debet  invenire 
...  in  festo  Innocencium  pueris 
candelas  et  -ij03  cereos  coram  parvo 
Episcopo.' 

6  Lichfield — J.  C.  Cox,  Sports  in 
Churches,  in  W.  Andrews,  Curious 
Church  Customs,  3,  quoting  inven- 
tories of  1345  and  of  the  fifteenth 
century.  The  latter  uses  the  term 
'Nicholas  Bishop.' 

7  Gloucester — Rimbault, I4,prints 
from  Cotton  MSS.  Vesp.  A.  xxv, 
f.  173,  a  Sermon  of  the  Child  Bishop, 
Pronoivnysed  by  John  Stubs,  Quere- 
ster,  on  Childermas  Day,  at  Gloce- 
ter,  1558. 

8  Norwich — a  fourteenth-century 
antiphonal  of  Sarum  Use,  probably 
of  Norwich  provenance  {Lansd. 
MS.  463,  f.  i6v),  provides  for  the 
giving  of  the  bacillus  to  the  Epi- 
scopus  Puerorum  at  Vespers  on 
St.  John's  Day. 

9  Beverley — the  fifth  earl  of 
Northumberland  about  1522  gave 
xx.y.  at  Christmas  to  the  '  Barne 
Bishop '  of  Beverley,  as  well  as  to 
him  of  York  (Percy,  North.  H.  B. 
340) ;  cf.  p.  357. 

10  Wordsworth,  Proc.  52 ;  cf. 
Appendix  M  (1). 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


359 


St.  Mary's1,  college  chapels  such  as  Magdalen2  and  All  Souls3, 
at  Oxford,  the  private  chapels  of  the  king4  and  the  earl 
of  Northumberland5,  and  many  parish  churches  both  in 
London 6,  and  throughout  the  length  and  breadth  of  England  7 
and  Scotland8. 

Nor  is  this  all.     Unlike  the  Feast  of  Fools,  the  Feast  of 
Boys  enjoyed  a  considerable  vogue  in  religious  houses.  When 


1  Ottery — Statutes  of  Bishop 
Grandisson  (1337),  quoted  by 
Warton,  ii.  229  '  Item  statuimus, 
quod  nullus  canonicus,  vicarius, 
vel  secundarius,  pueros  choristas  in 
festo  sanctorum  Innocentium  extra 
parochiam  de  Otery  trahant,  aut 
eis  licentiam  vagandi  concedant.' 

2  Magdalen — see  Appendix  E. 

3  All  Souls — An  inventory  has 
'  j  chem.  j  cap  et  mitra  pro  Episcopo 
Nicholao'  (Rock,  iii.  2.  217). 

4  In  1299  Edward  I  heard  vespers 
said  'de  Sancto  Nicholao  ...  in 
Capella  suaapud  Heton  iuxta  Novum 
Castrum  super  Tynam'  {Wardrobe 
Account,  ed.  Soc.  of  Antiq.,  25).  In 
1306  a  Boy  Bishop  officiated  before 
Edward  II  on  St.  Nicholas'  Day  in 
the  king's  chapel  at  Scroby  ( Ward- 
robe Account  in  Archaeologia,  xxvi. 
342).  In  1339  Edward  III  gave 
a  gift  '  Episcopo  puerorum  ecclesiae 
de  Andeworp  cantanti  coram  do- 
mino rege  in  camera  sua  in  festo 
sanctorum  Innocentium '  (Warton, 
ii.  229).  There  was  a  yearly  payment 
of  £1  to  the  Boy  Bishop  at  St. 
Stephen's,  Westminster,  in  1382 
(Devon,  Issues  of  Exchequer,  222), 
and  about  1 528-32  (Brewer,  iv.  1939). 

6  The  fifth  earl  of  Northumber- 
land (ti5i2)  was  wont  to  'gyfe 
yerly  upon  Saynt  Nicolas- Even  if 
he  kepe  Chapell  for  Saynt  Nicolas 
to  the  Master  of  his  Childeren  of  his 
Chapell  for  one  of  the  Childeren  of 
his  Chapell  yerely  vj8.  viijd.  And 
if  Saynt  Nicolas  com  owt  of  the 
Towne  wher  my  Lord  lyeth  and  my 
Lord  kepe  no  Chapell  than  to  have 
yerely  iij8.  iiijd.'  (Percy,  North.  H.B. 
343).  An  elaborate  Contenta  de 
Ornamentis  Ep.,puer.,  of  uncertain 
provenance,  is  printed  by  Percy,  op. 
cit.  439. 


6  St.  Mary  at  Hill  (Brand,  i.  233) ; 
St.  Mary  de  Prees  {Monasticon,  iii. 
360)  ;  St.  Peter  Cheap  {Journal  of 
Bt it.  Arch. Ass.  xxiv.  156);  Hospital 
of  St.  Katharine  by  the  Tower  {Reli- 
quary, iv.  153)  ;  Lambeth  (Lysons, 
Environs  of  London,  i.  310] ;    cf. 

P-  3°7- 

7  Louth  (E.  Hewlett,  Boy  Bishops, 
in  W.  Andrews,  Curious  Church 
Gleanings,  241) — the  payments  for 
the  Chyld  Bishop  include  some  for 
'making  his  See'  {sedes)  ;  Notting- 
ham {Archaeologia,  xxvi.  342); 
Sandwich  (Boys,  Hist,  of  S.  376) ; 
New  Romney(y/z'.r/.  Af.S'.S'.v.s  1 7-28), 
Yorkshire,  Derbyshire,  Somerset- 
shire (J.  C.  Cox,  Sports  in  Churches, 
in  W.  Andrews,  Curious  Church 
Customs)  ;  Bristol — L.  T.  Smith, 
RicarVs  {Calendar,  80  (1479- 1506, 
Camden  Soc).  On  Nov.  24,  the 
Mayor,  Sheriff,  and  '  worshipfull 
men  '  are  to  '  receyue  at  theire  dores 
Seynt  Kateryn's  pleyers,  making 
them  to  drynk  at  their  dores  and 
rewardyng  theym  for  theire  playes.' 
On  Dec.  5  they  are  '  to  walke  to 
Seynt  Nicholas  churche,  there  to 
hire  theire  even-song :  and  on  the 
morowe  to  hire  theire  masse,  and 
offre,  and  hire  the  bishop's  sermon, 
and  have  his  blissyng.'  After  dinner 
they  are  to  play  dice  at  the  mayor's 
counter,  '  and  when  the  Bishope  is 
come  thedir,  his  chapell  there  to 
synge,  and  the  bishope  to  geve  them 
his  blissyng,  and  then  he  and  all  his 
chapell  to  be  serued  there  with  brede 
and  wyne.'  And  so  to  even-song  in 
St.  Nicholas'  church. 

8  L.  T.  Accounts,  i.  ccxlvi  record 
annual  payments  by  James  IV 
(ti473~98)  to  Boy  Bishops  from 
Holyrood  Abbey  and  St.  Giles's, 
Edinburgh. 


360  FOLK  DRAMA 

John  Peckham,  archbishop  of  Canterbury,  was  drawing  up 
his  constitutions  for  such  communities  in  1279,  ne  found  it 
necessary  to  limit  the  duration  of  this  feast  to  the  eve  and 
day  of  the  Holy  Innocents  \  Traces  of  the  Boy  Bishop  are 
to  be  found  in  the  archives  of  more  than  one  great  monastery. 
A  Westminster  inventory  of  1388  gives  minute  descriptions 
of  vestments  and  ornaments  for  his  use,  many  of  which  appear 
to  have  been  quite  recently  provided  by  the  '  westerer '  or 
vestiarius,  Richard  Tonworthe2.  There  was  a  mitre  with 
silvered  and  gilt  plates  and  gems,  and  the  inscription  Sancte 
Nicholac  or  a  pro  nobis  set  in  pearls.  There  was  a  bacillus  with 
images  of  St.  Peter  and  St.  Edward  the  Confessor  upon 
thrones.  There  were  two  pair  of  cheveril  gloves,  to  match 
the  mitre.  There  were  an  amice,  a  rochet  and  a  surplice. 
There  were  two  albs  and  a  cope  of  blood  colour  worked  with 
gryphons  and  other  beasts  and  cisterns  spouting  water.  There 
was  another  'principal'  cope  of  ruby  and  blood-coloured 
velvet  embroidered  in  gold,  and  with  the  'new  arms  of 
England '  woven  into  it.  An  older  mitre  and  pair  of  gloves 
and  a  ring  had  been  laid  aside  as  old-fashioned  or  worn  out. 
Evidently  the  feast  was  celebrated  with  some  splendour. 
Several  of  the  vestments  are  again  inventoried  in  1540 3. 
A  payment  for  the  feast  is  recorded  in  a  Computus  of  141 3-14 4. 
The  accounts  of  the  obedientiaries  of  Durham  priory  show 
from  1369  onwards  many  payments  by  nearly  all  these  officers 
to  a  Boy  Bishop  of  the  almonry.  He  also  received  a  gift  up 
to  1528  from  the  dependent  house  or  '  cell '  of  Finchale  priory. 
This  payment  was  made  at  the  office  of  the  feretrarius  or 
keeper  of  Saint  Cuthbert's  shrine.  The  '  bishop '  is  called 
episcopus  puerilist  episcopus  eleemosynariae,  or  the  like.  In 
1405  he  was  not  elected,  propter  guerras  eo  tempore.  In  1423 
and  1434  there  was  also  an  episcopus  de  Elvett  or  Elvetham, 

1  Wilkins,  ii.  38  '  Puerilia  autem  *  Athenceum  (1900),  ii.  655,  692 
solemnia,  quae  in  festo  solent  fieri  •  data  Pueris  de  Elemosinaria  luden- 
Innocentumpostvesperas  S.  Iohan-  tibus  coram  Domino  apud  West- 
nis,  tantum  inchoari  permittimus,  monasterium,  iij8.  iiijd.'  Dr.  E.  J.  L. 
et  in  crastino  in  ipsa  die  Innocentum  Scott  and  Dr.  Rutherford  found  in 
totaliter  terminentur.'  this  entry  a  proof  of  the  existence 

2  Archaeologia,  lii.  221  sqq.  of  the  Westminster  Latin  play  at 
'  Transactions   of  London    and     '  a  period  anterior  to  the  foundation 

Middlesex  Arch.  Soc.  vols,  iv,  v.  of  Eton ' ! 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  361 

a  manor  of  the  priory l.  The  abbey  of  Bury  St.  Edmunds 
had  its  episcopus  sancti  Nicolai  in  1418  and  for  at  least  a 
century  longer  2.  At  Winchester  each  of  the  great  monasteries 
held  a  Feast  of  Boys ;  the  abbey  of  Hyde  on  St.  Nicholas'  day 3 ; 
the  priory  of  St.  Swithin's  on  that  of  the  Holy  Innocents. 
Here,  too,  the  accounts  of  the  obedientiaries  contain  evidence 
of  the  feast  in  payments  between  1312  and  1536  for  beer  or 
wine  sent  to  the  episcopus  iuvenum.  Nearly  all  the  officers 
whose  rolls  are  preserved,  the  chamberlain,  the  curtarian,  the 
cellarian,  the  almoner,  the  sacristan,  the  custos  operum, 
the  hordarian,  seem  to  have  contributed4.  A  Computus  of 
1 441  contains  a  payment  to  the  pueri  eleemosynariae  who, 
with  the  pueri  of  St.  Elizabeth's  chapel,  visited  St.  Mary's 
convent,  dressed  as  girls,  and  danced,  sang  and  sported  before 
the  abbess  and  the  nuns 5.  We  have  had  some  French 
instances  in  which  the  Boy  Bishop  visited  a  neighbouring 
convent.  But  the  nuns  were  not  always  dependent  on  out- 
side visitors  for  their  revel.  In  some  places  they  held  their 
own  feast,  with  an  '  abbess  '  instead  of  a  '  bishop.'  Archbishop 
John  Peckham,  in  addition  to  his  general  constitution  already 
quoted,  issued  a  special  mandate  to  Godstow  nunnery,  for- 
bidding the  office  and  prayers  to  be  said  per  parvulas  on 
Innocents'  day6.  Three  centuries  later,  in  1526,  a  visitation 
of  Carrow  nunnery  by  Richard  Nicke,  bishop  of  Norwich, 
disclosed  a  custom  of  electing  a  Christmas  '  abbess '  there, 
which  the  bishop  condemned 7.    Continental  parallels  to  these 

1  Rimbault,       xviii ;        Finchale  Documents  (H.  R.  Soc),  24. 
Priory  (Surtees    Soc),  ccccxxviii ;  6  Warton,    ii.    231     '  1441,    pro 
Durham  Accounts  (Surtees  Soc),  pueris    Eleemosynariae    una    cum 
iii.  xliii,  and  passim.  pueris  Capellae  sanctae  Elizabethae, 

2  Hist.  MSS.  xiv.  8.  124,  157.  ornatis  more  puellarum,  et  saltanti- 

3  Computi  of  Cellarer  (Warton,  bus,  cantantibus,  et  ludentibus, 
ii.  232,  iii.  300)  '  1397,  pro  epulis  coram  domina  Abbatissa  et  mo- 
Pueri  celebrantis  in  festo  S.  Nicholai  nialibus  Abbathiae  beatae  Mariae 
...  1490,  in  larvis  et  aliis  indumentis  virginis,  in  aula  ibidem  in  die 
PuerorumvisentiumDominumapud  sanctorum  Innocentium.' 
Wulsey,  et  Constabularium  Castri  6  Harpsfield,  Hist.  Eccl.  Angl. 
Winton.inapparatu  suo,necnonsub-  (1622),  441,  citing  Peckham's  Regi- 
intrantium  omnia  monasteria  civita-  ster.  He  says  the  mandate  was  in 
tis  Winton,  in  festo  sancti  Nicholai.'  French. 

4  G.  W.  Kitchin,  Computus  Rolls  7  Visitations  0/  Diocese  of  Nor- 
of  St.  Swithin's  (Hampshire  Rec.  wich  (Camden  Soc),  209  '  Domina 
Soc),  passim  ;  G.  W.  Kitchin  and  Iohanna  Botulphe  dicit  . . .  quod  . . . 
F.  T.  Madge,  Winchester  Chapter  habent    in    festo    Natalis    Domini 


362 


FOLK  DRAMA 


examples  are  available.  An  eighth-century  case,  indeed, 
which  is  quoted  by  some  writers,  has  probably  been  the 
subject  of  a  misinterpretation  \  But  the  visitation-books  of 
Odo  Rigaud,  archbishop  of  Rouen  (1248-69)  record  that  he 
forbade  the  ludibria  of  the  younger  nuns  at  the  Christmas 
feasts  and  the  feast  of  St.  Mary  Magdalen  in  more  than  one 
convent  of  his  diocese.  One  of  these  was  the  convent  of  the 
Holy  Trinity  at  Caen,  in  which  an  '  abbess '  was  still  chosen 
by  the  novices  in  1423  2.  All  the  monastic  examples  here 
quoted  come  from  houses  of  the  older  foundations.  The 
Statutes,  however,  of  the  Observant  Franciscans  made  at 
Barcelona  in  1401,  expressly  forbid  the  use  of  secular  garments 
or  the  loan  of  habits  of  the  order  for  ludi  on  St.  Nicholas'  or 
Innocents'  days  3 ;  whence  it  may  be  inferred  that  the  irregu- 
larities provided  against  were  not  unknown. 

Mediaeval   education    began    with   the   song-school  :    and 


iuniorem  monialem  in  abbatissam 
assumptam,  vocandi  [?  iocandi]  gra- 
tia ;  cuius  occasione  ipsa  consumere 
et  dissipare  cogitur  quae  vel  elemosi- 
na  vel  aliorum  amicorum  largitione 
acquisierit  .  .  .  Iniunctum  est  .  .  . 
quod  de  cetero  non  observetur 
assumptioabbatissaevocandicausa.' 

1  Gregory  of  Tours,  x.  16  (M.  G. 
H.  Script.  Rerum  Meroving.  i.  427), 
mentions  among  the  complaints  laid 
before  the  visitors  of  the  convent  of 
St.  Radegund  in  Poitou,  that  the 
abbess  '  vittam  de  auro  exornatam 
idem  neptae  suae  superflue  fecerit, 
barbaturias  intus  eo  quod  celebra- 
verit.'  Ducange,  s.  v.  Barbatoriae, 
finds  here  a  reference  to  some  kind 
of  masquing,  and  Peter  of  Blois, 
Epist.  14,  certainly  uses  barbatores 
as  a  synonym  for  mitni.  The  M. 
G.  H.  editors  of  Gregory,  however, 
explain  '  barbatoria  '  as  ' primam 
barbam  ponerej  the  sense  borne  by 
the  term  in  Petronius,  Sat.  Ixxiii.  6. 
The  abbess's  niece  had  probably  no 
beard,  but  may  not  the  reference  be 
to  the  cutting  of  the  hair  of  a  novice 
when  she  takes  the  vows  ? 

2  Ducange,  s.  v.  Kalendae  ('  de 
monialibus  Villae-Arcelli '),  '  Item 
inhibemus  ne  de  caetero  in  festis 
Innocentum  et  B.  M.  Magdalenae 


ludibria  exerceatis  consueta,  in- 
duendo  vos  scilicet  vestibus  saecu- 
larium  aut  inter  vos  seu  cum  secula- 
ribus  choreas  ducendo ' ;  and  again 
'  in  festo  S.  Iohannis  et  Innocentium 
mimia  iocositate  et  scurrilibus  canti- 
bus  utebantur,  ut  pote  farsis,  con- 
ductis,  motulis  ;  praecepimus  quod 
honestius  et  cum  maiori  devotione 
alias  se  haberent '  ;  Gaste\  36  (on 
Caen)  '  iuniores  in  festo  Innocen- 
tium cantant  lectiones  suas  cum 
farsis.  Hoc  inhibuimus.'  In  1423, 
the  real  abbess  gave  place  to  the 
little  abbess  at  the  Deposuit.  Caste", 
44,  describes  a  survival  of  the  elec- 
tion of  an  '  abbess '  from  amongst 
the  pensionnaires  on  the  days  of 
St.  Catherine  and  the  Innocents  in 
the  Abbaye  aux  Bois,  Faubourg 
St.  Germain,  from  the  Memoires  of 
He"lene  Massalska.    This  was  about 

1773- 

3  Howlett,  Monumenta  Franci- 
scana  (R.  S.),  ii.  93  '  Caveant  fratres 
in  festo  Sancti  Nicolai  seu  Inno- 
centium, vel  quibuscunque  aliis  festis 
vestes  extraneas  religiosas  seu  secu- 
lares  aut  clericales  vel  muliebres 
sub  specie  devotionis  induere  ;  nee 
habitus  fratrum  secularibus  pro  ludis 
faciendis  accommodentur  sub  poena 
amotionis  confusibilis  de  conventu.' 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  363 

although  the  universities  and  other  great  seats  of  learning  came 
to  be  much  more  than  glorified  choirs,  they  still  retained 
certain  traces  of  their  humble  origin.  Amongst  these  was  the 
Boy  Bishop.  The  students  of  Paris  regularly  chose  their  Boy 
Bishops  on  St.  Nicholas'  day.  In  1275,  indeed,  the  Faculty  of 
Arts  forbade  the  torchlight  processions  which  took  place  on 
that  day  and  on  St.  Catherine's,  the  two  great  common 
holidays  of  the  clerks  \  But  in  1367  such  processions  were 
held  as  of  ancient  custom,  and  it  would  appear  that  every  little 
group  of  students  gathered  together  under  the  protection  and 
in  the  house  of  a  master  of  arts  considered  itself  entitled  to 
choose  a  '  bishop,'  and  to  lead  him  in  a  rout  through  the 
streets.  In  that  year  the  custom  led  to  a  tragic  brawl  which 
came  under  the  cognizance  of  the  Parlement  of  Paris  2.  The 
scholars  of  one  Peter  de  Zippa,  dwelling  in  vico  Bucherie  ultra 
Parvum  Pattern,  had  chosen  as  '  bishop  '  Bartholomew  Divitis 
of  Ypres.  On  St.  Nicholas'  eve,  they  were  promenading, 
with  a  torch  but  unarmed,  to  the  houses  of  the  rector 
of  the  Faculty  and  others  causa  solacii  et  iocosa,  when  they 
met  with  the  watch.  Peter  de  Zippa  was  with  them,  and  the 
watch  had  a  grudge  against  Peter.  On  the  previous  St. 
Catherine's  day  they  had  arrested  him,  but  he  had  been 
released  by  the  prefet.  They  now  attacked  the  procession 
with  drawn  swords,  and  wounded  Jacobus  de  Buissono  in  the 
leg.  As  the  scholars  were  remonstrating,  up  came  Philippus 
de  Villaribus,  miles  gueti,  and  Bernardus  Blondelli,  his  deputy, 
and  cried  '  Ad  mortem'.  The  scholars  fled  home,  but  the 
watch  made  an  attack  on  the  house.  Peter  de  Zippa  attempted 
to  appease  them  from  a  window,  and  was  wounded  four  fingers 
from  a  mortal  spot.  As  the  watch  were  on  the  point  of  break- 
ing in,  the  scholars  surrendered.     The  house  was  looted,  and 

1  Denifle,   i.    532.       It    was   for-  abbas  beiannorum  ad  octo  solidos 

bidden  '  in  eisdem  festis    vel  aliis  parisienses,  eo  quod  non  explevisset 

paramenta  nee  coreas  duci  in  vico  officium  suum  die  Innocentium  post 

de  die  nee  de  nocte  cum  torticiis  vel  prandium,  in  mundationem  beian- 

sine.'    But  it  was  on  Innocents'  Day  norum    per  aspersionem   aquae   ut 

that  the  bejaunes  or  '  freshmen '  of  moris  est,  quanquam  solemniter  in- 

the    Sorbonne    were    subjected   to  coepisset    exercere    suum   officium 

rites    bearing-   a  close   analogy    to  ante  prandium  inducendo  beiannos 

the    feast    of   fools  ;    cf.    Rigollot,  per  vicum  super  asinum.' 

172  '  1476  .  .  .  condemnatus  fuit  in  i  Denifle,  iii.  166. 
crastino     Innocentium     capellanus 


364  FOLK  DRAMA 

the  inmates  beaten.  One  lad  was  pitched  out  on  his  head  and 
driven  into  the  Seine,  out  of  which  he  was  helped  by  a  woman. 
Peter  de  Zippa  and  twenty-four  others  were  rolled  in  the  mud 
and  then  carried  off  to  the  Chdtclct,  where  they  were  shut  up 
in  a  dark  and  malodorous  cell.  Worst  of  all,  the  'bishop' 
had  disappeared  altogether.  It  was  believed  that  the  watch 
had  slain  him,  and  flung  the  body  into  the  Seine.  A  com- 
plaint was  brought  before  the  Parlemcnt,  and  a  commission  of 
inquiry  appointed.  The  watch  declared  that  Peter  de  Zippa 
was  insubordinate  to  authority  and,  although  warned,  as 
a  foreigner,  both  in  French  and  Latin l,  that  they  were  the 
king's  men,  persisted  in  hurling  logs  and  stones  out  of  his 
window,  with  the  result  of  knocking  four  teeth  out  of  Peter 
Patou's  mouth,  and  wounding  the  horse  of  Philip  de  Villaribus. 
This  defence  was  apparently  thought  unsatisfactory,  and 
a  further  inquiry  was  held,  with  the  aid  of  torture.  Finally 
the  court  condemned  the  offending  watch  to  terms  of  imprison- 
ment and  the  payment  of  damages.  They  had  also  to  offer 
a  humble  apology,  with  bare  head  and  bent  knee,  to  the 
bishop  of  Paris,  the  rector  of  the  Faculty,  Peter  de  Zippa, 
and  the  injured  scholars,  in  the  cloister  or  the  chapter-house 
of  St.  Mathurin's.  The  case  of  the  alleged  murder  of  the 
'  bishop,'  Bartholomew  Divitis,  was  not  to  be  prejudiced  by 
this  judgement,  and  Peter  de  Zippa  was  warned  to  be  more 
submissive  to  authority  in  future.  The  whole  episode  is  an 
interesting  parallel  to  the  famous  '  town  and  gown  '  at  Oxford 
on  St.  Scholastica's  day,  1353  2. 

Provision  is  made  for  a  Boy  Bishop  in  the  statutes  of  more 
than  one  great  English  educational  foundation.  William  of 
Wykeham  ordained  in  1400  that  one  should  be  chosen  at 
Winchester  College,  and  at  New  College,  Oxford,  and  should 
recite  the  office  at  the  Feast  of  the  Innocents 3.     Some  notices 

1  'Verbis nedum  gallicis  sed  eciam  503)  ' Permittimus  tamen  quod  in 
latinis,  ut  ipsi  qui  de  partibus  alie-  festo  Innocencium  pueri  vesperas 
nis  oriundi  linguam  gallicam  nequa-  matutinas  et  alia  divina  officia  le- 
quam  intelligebant  plenarie.'  genda  et  cantanda  dicere  et  exse- 

2  S.  F.  Hulton,  Rixae  Oxontenses,  qui  valeant  secundum  usum  et  con- 
68.  There  had  been  many  earlier  suetudinem  ecclesiae  Sarum.'  The 
brawls.  same  formula  is  used  in  New  Col- 

3  Statute  xxix  (T.  F.  Kirby,  lege  Statute  xlii  {Statutes  of  the 
Annals    of    Winchester    College,     Colleges  of  Oxford,  vol.  i). 


THE  BOY  BISHOP  365 

in  the  Winchester  College  accounts  during  the  fifteenth  cen- 
tury show  that  he  also  presided  at  secular  revels.  In  1462 
he  is  called  Episcopus  Nicholatensis,  and  on  St.  Nicholas'  day 
he  paid  a  visit  of  ceremony  to  the  warden,  who  presented  him, 
out  of  the  college  funds,  with  fourpence 1.  The  example  of 
William  of  Wykeham  was  followed,  forty  years  later,  in  the 
statutes  of  the  royal  foundations  of  Eton  College  and  King's 
College,  Cambridge.  But  there  was  one  modification.  These 
colleges  were  dedicated  to  the  Virgin  and  to  St.  Nicholas,  and 
it  was  carefully  laid  down  that  the  performance  of  the  officium 
by  the  '  bishop '  was  to  be  on  St.  Nicholas'  day,  '  and  by  no 
means  on  that  of  the  Innocents  V  The  Eton  '  bishop  '  is  said 
by  the  Elizabethan  schoolmaster  Malim,  who  wrote  a  Consue- 
tudinarium  of  the  college  in  1561,  to  have  been  called  epi- 
scopus Nihilensis,  and  to  have  been  chosen  on  St.  Hugh's  day 
(November  17).  Probably  Nihilensis  is  a  scribal  mistake  for 
Nicholatensis  3.  The  custom  had  been  abolished  before  Malim 
wrote,  but  was  extant  in  1507,  for  in  that  year  the  '  bishop's ' 
rochet  was  mended4.  Some  Eton  historians  have  thought 
that  the  Boy  Bishop  ceremony  was  the  origin  of  the  famous 

1  Cf.  Appendix  E.  Kirby,  op.  cit.  secreta  exequi  et  dici  permittimus 
90,  quotes  an  inventory  of  1406  perepiscopum  puerorumscholarium, 
'  Baculus  pastoralis  de  cupro  de-  ad  hoc  de  eisdem  annis  singulis  eli- 
aurato   pro  Epo   puerorum  in   die  gendum.' 

Innocencium  .  .  .  Mitra  de  panno  3  Warton,    ii.   228;     Leach,  133. 

aureo  ex  dono  Dni.   Fundatoris  her-  The  passage  from  the  Consuetudi- 

nesiat  (mounted)  cum  argento  de-  narium  is  given  from  Harl.  MS. 

aurato   ex    dono    unius    socii    coll.  7044  f.  167   (apparently  a  transcript 

[Robert  Heete]  pro  Epo  puerorum.'  from  a  C.  C.  C.  C.  MS.)  by  Heywood 

2  The  Charter  of  King's  College  and  Wright,  op.  cit.  632  ;  E.  S. 
(1443),  c.  42  (Documents  relating  to  Creasy,  Eminent  Etonians,  91 
the  Univ.  of  Camb.  ii.  569 ;  Hey-  '  in  die  Sli  Hugonis  pontificis  sole- 
wood  and  Wright,  Ancient  Laws  of  bat  Aetonae  fieri  electio  Episcopi 
the  Fifteenth  Century  for  King's  Nihilensis, sedconsuetudoobsolevit. 
Coll.  Camb.  and  Eton  Coll.  112),  Olim  episcopus  ille  puerorum  habe- 
closely  follows  Wykeham's  formula:  batur  nobilis,  in  cuius  electione  et 
'excepto  festo  S^Nicholaipraedicto,  literata  et  laudatissima  exercitatio, 
in  quo  festo  et  nullatenus  in  festo  ad  ingeniorum  vires  et  motus  exci- 
Innocentium,  permittimus  quod  tandos,  Aetonae  Celebris  erat.' 
pueri  .  .  .  secundum  usum  in  dicto  4  Eton  Audit  Book,  1507-8,  quoted 
Regali  Collegio  hactenus  usitatum.'  by  H.  C.  Maxwell-Lyte,  Hist,  of 
The  Eton  formula  (c.  31)  in  1444  is  Eton  (ed.  1899),  149  J  Pro  repara- 
slightly  different  (Heywood  and  tione  le  rochet  pro  episcopo  puero- 
Wright  (op.  cit.  560)  'excepto  in  rum,  xjd.'  An  inventory  of  Henry 
festo  Sancti  Nicholai,  in  quo,  et  VIU's  reign  says  that  this  rochet 
nullatenus  in  festo  Sanctorum  Inno-  was  given  by  James  Denton  (K.  S. 
centium,divinaofficiapraetermissae  i486)  for  use  at  St.  Nicholas'  time. 


366  FOLK  DRAMA 

*  Montem  ' ;  but  as  the  '  Montem  '  was  held  on  the  feast  of  the 
Conversion  of  St.  Paul  (January  25),  and  as  Malim  mentions 
both  customs  independently,  this  is  improbable  \ 

Smaller  schools  than  Winchester  or  Eton  had  none  the  less 
their  Boy  Bishops.  Archbishop  Rotherham,  who  founded  in 
1 48 1  a  college  at  his  native  place  of  Rotherham  in  Yorkshire, 
left  by  will  in  1500  a  mitre  for  the  '  barnebishop  V  The 
grammar  school  at  Canterbury  had,  or  should  have  had,  its 
Boy  Bishop  in  1464 3.  Aberdeen  was  a  city  of  which  St. 
Nicholas  was  the  patron,  and  at  Aberdeen  the  master  of  the 
grammar  school  was  paid  by  a  collection  taken  when  he  went 
the  rounds  with  the  '  bishop  •  on  St.  Nicholas'  day  4.  Dean 
Colet,  on  the  other  hand,  when  founding  St.  Paul's  school 
did  not  provide  for  a  '  bishop '  in  the  school  itself,  but,  as  we 
have  seen,  directed  the  scholars  to  attend  the  mass  and  sermon 
of  the  f  bishop  '  in  the  cathedral. 

Naturally  the  Reformation  made  war  on  the  Boy  Bishop. 
A  royal  proclamation  of  July  22,  1541,  forbade  the  'gather- 
ings '  by  children  '  decked  and  apparalid  to  counterfaite 
priestes,  bysshopps,  and  women '  on  '  sainte  Nicolas,  sainte 
Catheryne,  sainte  Clement,  the  holye  Innocentes,  and  such  like,' 
and  also  the  singing  of  mass  and  preaching  by  boys  on  these 
days 5.     Naturally  also,  during  the  Marian  reaction  the  Boy 

1  Maxwell-Lyte,  op.  cit.  450.  resauis  him  and  the  bischopatSanct 

2  Hearne,  Liber  Niger  Scaccarii,  Nicolace  day.'  This  is  to  be  held 
674  '  Item,  unam  Mitram  de  Cloth  a  legal  fee,  '  he  hes  na  uder  fee  to 
of  goold  habentem  2  knoppes  arg.  leif  on.' 

enameld,    dat.    ad    occupand.    per  6  Wilkins,  Concilia,  iii.  860  '  And 

Barnebishop.'  whereas     heretofore    dyverse     and 

3  John  Stone,  a  monk  of  Canter-  many  superstitious  and  childysshe 
bury,  records  in  his  De  Obitibus  et  observations  have  been  usid,  and 
aliis  Memorabilibus  sui  Coenobii  yet  to  this  day  are  observed  and 
(MS.  C.  C.  C.  C,  Q.  8,  quoted  War-  kept  in  many  and  sondry  parties  of 
ton,  ii.  230)  'Hoc  anno,  1464,  in  this  realm,  as  upon  sainte  Nicolas, 
festo  Sancti  Nicolai  nonerat  episco-  sainte  Catheryne,  sainte  Clement, 
pus  puerorum  in  schola  grammatica  the  holye  Innocentes,  and  such  like; 
in  civitate  Cantuariae  ex  defectu  children  be  strangelye  decked  and 
Magistrorum,  viz.  I.  Sidney  et  T.  apparelid  to  counterfaite  priestes, 
Hikson.'  bysshopps,    and   women  ;    and   so 

4  J.  Stuart,  Extracts  from  Coun-  ledde  with  songes  and  dauncesfrom 
cil  Registers  of  Aberdeen  (Spalding  house  to  house,  bleasing  the  people, 
Club), i.  186.  The  council  ordered  on  andgatheryngeofmonye;  andboyes 
Nov.  27,  1542,  '  that  the  maister  of  doo  singe  masse,  and  preache  in  the 
thair  grammar  scuyll  sell  haf  iiij3  pulpitt,  with  suche  other  unfittinge 
Scottis,  of  the  sobirest  persoun  that  and  inconvenyent  usages,  rather  to 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


367 


Bishop  reappeared.  On  November  13,  1554,  Bishop  Bonner 
issued  an  order  permitting  all  clerks  in  the  diocese  of  London 
to  have  St.  Nicholas  and  to  go  abroad  ;  and  although  this 
order  was  annulled  on  the  very  eve  of  the  festival,  apparently 
because  Cardinal  Pole  had  appointed  St.  Nicholas'  day  for 
a  great  ceremony  of  reconciliation  at  Lambeth,  yet  the 
custom  was  actually  revived  in  several  London  parishes, 
including  St.  Andrew's,  Holborn,  and  St.  Nicholas  Olave, 
Bread  Street1.     In  1556  it  was  still  more  widely  observed 2. 


the  derision  than  to  any  true  glory  of 
God,  or  honour  of  his  saints  ;  the 
kyng's  majestie  therefore  mynd- 
ing  nothing  so  moche,  as  to  avaunce 
the  true  glorye  of  God  without 
vayne  superstition,  willith  and  com- 
maundeth,  that  from  henceforth  all 
suche  superstitions  be  loste  and 
clyerlye  extinguisshed  throughowte 
all  this  his  realmes  and  dominions, 
forasmoche  as  the  same  doo  resemble 
rather  the  unlawfull  superstition  of 
gentilitie,  than  the  pure  and  sincere 
religion  of  Christe.'  Brand,  i.  236, 
suggests  that  there  was  an  earlier 
proclamation  of  July  22,  1540,  to  the 
same  effect.  Johan  Bale  in  his  Yet 
a  Course  at  the  Romyshe  Foxe  ( 1 542), 
says  that  if  Bonner's  censure  of  those 
who  lay  aside  certain  '  auncyent 
rytes  '  is  justified,  '  then  ought  my 
Lorde  also  to  suffer  the  same  selfe 
ponnyshment,fornotgoyngeabought 
with  Saynt  Nycolas  clarkes.'  Tho- 
mas Becon,  Catechism,  320  (ed. 
Parker  Soc),  compares  a  bishop  who 
does  not  preach,  a  '  dumb  dog,'  to 
a  '  Nicholas  bishop.'  The  Articles 
put  to  bishop  Gardiner  in  1550  re- 
quired him  to  declare  'that  the  coun- 
terfeiting St.  Nicholas,  St.  Clement, 
St.  Catherine  and  St.  Edmund,  by 
children,  heretofore  brought  into  the 
church,  was  a  mockery  and  foolish- 
ness '  (Froude,  iv.  550). 

1  Machyn's  Diary,  75  '  The  xij 
day  of  November  [1554]  was  com- 
mondyd  by  the  bysshope  of  London 
to  all  clarkes  in  the  dyoses  of  Lon- 
don for  to  have  Sant  Necolas  and  to 
go  a-brod,  as  mony  as  wold  have 
ytt .  .  .  [the  v  day  of  December,  the 
which  was  Saint  Nicholas'  eve,  at 


evensong  time,  came  a  command- 
ment that  St.  Nicholas  should  not 
go  abroad,  nor  about.  But,  not- 
withstanding, there  went  about  these 
Saint  Nicholases  in  divers  parishes, 
as  St.  Andrew's,  Holborn,  and  St.] 
Nicolas  Olyffe  in  Bredstret.'  War- 
ton,  iv.  237,  says  that  during  Mary's 
reign  Hugh  Rhodes,  a  gentleman 
or  musician  of  the  Chapel  royal, 
printed  in  black  letter  quarto  a 
poem  of  thirty-six  octave  stanzas, 
entitled  The  Song  of  the  Chyld- 
byfshop,  as  it  was  songe  before  the 
queenes  maieslie  in  her  privie  cham- 
ber at  her  manour  of  saynt  James 
in  the  Feeldes  on  Saynt  Nicholas 
day  and  Innocents  day  this  yeare 
nowe  present,  by  the  chylde  bysshope 
of  Poules  churche  with  his  com- 
pany! Warton  apparently  saw  the 
poem,  for  he  describes  it  as  'a  ful- 
some panegyric  on  the  queen's  de- 
votion, in  which  she  is  compared  to 
Judith,  Esther,  the  Queen  of  Sheba, 
and  the  Virgin  Mary,'  but  no  copy 
of  it  is  now  known  ;  cf.  F.  J.  Furni- 
vall,  The  Babees  Book  (E.  E.  T.  S.), 
lxxxv. 

2  Machyn's  Diary,  121  'The  v 
day  of  Desember  [1556]  was  Sant 
Necolas  evyn,  and  Sant  Necolas 
whentt  a-brod  in  most  partt  in  Lon- 
don syngyng  after  the  old  fassyon, 
and  was  reseyvyd  with  mony  good 
pepulle  in-to  ther  howses,  and  had 
myche  good  chere  as  ever  they 
had,  in  mony  plasses.'  Foxe,  Acts 
and  Monuments,  viii.  726,  cele- 
brates the  wit  of  a  'godly  matron,' 
Mrs.  Gertrude  Crockhay,  who  shut 
'  the  foqlish  popish  Saint  Nicholas  ' 
out  of  her  house  in  this  year,  and 


368 


FOLK  DRAMA 


But  upon  the  accession  of  Elizabeth  it  naturally  fell  again 
into  disuse,  and  it  has  left  few,  if  any,  traces  in  modern  folk- 
custom  \ 

I  need  not,  after  the  last  two  chapters,  attempt  an  elaborate 
analysis  of  the  customs  connected  with  the  Boy  Bishop.  In 
the  main  they  are  parallel  to  those  of  the  Feast  of  Fools. 
They  include  the  burlesque  of  divine  service,  the  quite  y  the 
banquet,  the  dominus  festi.  Like  the  Feast  of  Fools,  'they 
probably  contain  a  folk  as  well  as  an  ecclesiastical  element. 
But  the  former  is  chastened  and  subdued,  the  strength  of 
ecclesiastical  discipline  having  proved  sufficient,  in  the  case  of 
the  boys,  to  bar  for  the  most  part  such  excesses  as  the  adult 
clerks  inherited  from  the  pagan  Kalends-  .  On  one  point,  how- 
ever, a  little  more  must  be  said.  The  dominus  festi,  who  at 
the  Feast  of  Fools  bears  various  names,  is  almost  invariably 
at  the  Feast  of  Boys  a  '  bishop  V     This  term  must  have  been 


told  her  brother-in-law,  Dr  Mallet, 
when  he  remonstrated,  that  she  had 
heard  of  men  robbed  by  •  Saint 
Nicholas's  clerks.'  This  was  a 
slang  term  for  thieves,  of  whom,  as 
of  children,  St.  Nicholas  was  the 
patron ;  for  the  reason  of  which 
cf.  Golden  Legend,  ii.  119.  Another 
procession  forbidden  by  the  pro- 
clamation of  1 541  was  also  revived 
in  1556;  cf.  Machyn's  Diary,  119 
1  [The  xxiv  day  of  November,  being 
the  eve  of  Saint  Katharine,  at  six  of 
the  clock  at  night]  sant  Katheryn('s) 
lyght  [went  about  the  battlements 
of  Saint  Paul's  with  singing,]  and 
Sant  Katheryn  gohying  a  prosses- 
syon.' 

1  At  Exton  in  Rutlandshire,  chil- 
dren were  allowed  at  the  beginning 
of  the  nineteenth  century  to  play 
in  the  church  on  Innocents'  Day 
{Leicester  and  Rutland  Folk-Lore, 
96).  Probably  a  few  other  examples 
could  be  collected. 

a  At  Mainz,  not  only  the  pueri, 
but  also  the  diaconi  and  the  sacer- 
dotes,  had  their  episcopus  (Diirr,  71). 
On  the  other  hand  at  Vienne  the 
term  used  at  all  the  feasts,  of  the 
triduum  and  on  January  1  and  6, 
was  rex  (Pilot  de  Thorey,  Usages, 


Fetes  et  Coutumes  en  Dauphine', 
i.  179).  The  Boy  Bishops  received, 
for  their  brief  day,  all  the  external 
marks  of  honour  paid  to  real 
bishops.  They  are  alleged  to  have 
occasionally  enjoyed  more  solid 
privileges.  Louvet  (Hist,  et  Ant. 
de  Beauvais,  cited  Rigollot,  142), 
says  that  at  Beauvais  the  right  of 
presentation  to  chapter  benefices 
falling  vacant  on  Innocents'  Day  fell 
to  the  pueri.  Jean  Van  der  Muelen 
or  Molanus  (De  Canonicis  (1587),  ii. 
43)  makes  a  similar  statement  as  to 
Cambrai :  '  Immo  personatus  hie 
episcopus  in  quibusdam  locis  redi- 
tus,  census  et  capones,  annue  per- 
cipit:  alibi  mitram  habet,  multis 
episcoporum  mitris  sumptuosiorem. 
In  Cameracensi  ecclesia  visus  est 
vacantem,  in  mense  episcopi,  prae- 
bendam,  quasi  iure  ad  se  devoluto, 
conferre  ;  quam  collationem  bene- 
ficii  vere  magnifici,  reverendissimus 
praesul,  cum  puer  grato  animo,  ma- 
gistrum  suum,  bene  de  ecclesia 
meritum,  nominasset,  gratam  et  ra- 
ram  habuit.'  At  Mainz  lost  tradi- 
tion had  it  that  if  an  Elector  died 
during  the  tenure  of  office  by  a  Boy 
Bishop,  the  revenues  sede  vacante 
would  fall  to  him.     Unfortunately 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


369 


familiar  by  the  end  of  the  eleventh  century  for  it  lends  a  point 
of  sarcasm  to  the  protest  made  by  Yves,  bishop  of  Chartres,  in 
a  letter  to  Pope  Urban  II  against  the  disgraceful  nomination 
by  Philip  I  of  France  of  a  wanton  lad  to  be  bishop  of  Orleans 
in  1099  x.  In  later  documents  it  appears  in  various  forms,  episco- 
pus puerorum,  episcopellus 2,  episcopus  puerilis  or  parvulus, '  boy 
bishop,'  'child  bishop,'  'barne  bishop.'  In  some  English 
monasteries  it  is  episcopus  eleemosynariae  ('of  the  almonry') ;  in 
Germany,  Schul-Bischof,  or,  derisively,  Apfeln-Bischof.  More 
significant  than  any  of  these  is  the  common  variant  episcopus 
Nicholatensis,  'Nicholas  bishop.'  For  St.  Nicholas'  day 
(December  6)  was  hardly  less  important  in  the  career  of  the 
Boy  Bishop  than  that  of  the  Holy  Innocents  itself.  At  this  feast 
he  was  generally  chosen  and  began  his  quete  through  the  streets. 
In  more  than  one  locality,  Mainz  for  instance  in  Germany, 
Eton  in  England,  it  was  on  this  day  as  well  as,  or  in  substitu- 
tion for,  that  of  the  Innocents  that  he  made  his  appearance  in 
divine  service  3.     St.  Nicholas  was,  of  course,  the  patron  saint 


the  chapter  and  verse  of  history 
disprove  this  (Diirr,  67,  79).  On 
the  other  hand  it  is  certain  that  the 
Boy  Bishops  assumed  the  episcopal 
privilege  of  coinage.  Rigollot,  52 
sqq.,  describes  and  figures  a  long 
series  of  fifteenth-  and  sixteenth- 
century  coins .  or  medals  mostly 
struck  by  'bishops'  of  the  various 
churches  and  monastic  houses  of 
Amiens.  They  are  the  more  inter- 
esting, because  some  of  them  bear 
'  fools  '  as  devices,  and  thus  afford 
another  proof  of  the  relations  be- 
tween the  feasts  of  Boys  and  Fools. 
Lille  monetae  of  the  sixteenth 
century  are  figured  by  Vanhende, 
Numismatique  Lilloise,  256,  and 
others  from  Laon  by  C.  Hide-,  in 
Bull,  de  la  Soc.  acad.  de  Laon,  xiii. 
126.  Some  of  Rigollot's  specimens 
seem  to  have  belonged,  not  to  Boy 
Bishops,  but  to  confriries,  who 
struck  them  as  '  jetons  de  presence  ' 
(Chartier,  Eancien  Chapitre  de 
N.-D.  de  Paris,  178) ;  and  probably 
this  is  also  the  origin  of  the  pieces 
found  at  Bury  St.  Edmunds,  which 
have   nothing   in   their  devices   to 


connect  them  with  a  Boy  Bishop 
(Rimbault,  xxvi). 

1  Ivo  Carnotensis,  Epist.  67,  ad 
papam  Urbanum  (P.  L.  clxii.  87) 

'eligimus  puerum,  puerorum  festa 

colentes, 
non  nostrum  morem,  sed  regis 

iussa  sequentes.' 
Cf.  Rigollot,  143. 

2  Lucas  Cusentinus  (11203-24) 
Ordinarium  ( Martene,  iii.  39) : 
'  Puero  episcopello  pontificalia  con- 
ceduntur  insignia,  et  ipse  dicit  ora- 
tiones.' 

3  The  Ritual  ft  1264)  of  St.  Omer 
{Me'm.  de  la  Soc.  des  Antiq.  de  la 
Morinie,  xx.  186)  has  the  following 
rubric  for  St.  Nicholas'  Day  '  in  se- 
cundis  vesperis  ...  a  choristis  in- 
cipitur prosa  Sospitati  dedit  egros, 
in  qua  altercando  cantatur  iste  ver- 
sus Ergo  laudes  novies  tantum,  ne 
immoderatum  tedium  generet  vel 
derisum.'  The  same  rubric  recurs 
on  St.  Catherine's  Day.  At  St. 
Omer,  as  at  Paris  (cf.  p.  363),  these 
were  the  two  winter  holidays  for 
scholars.  Cf.  also  p.  289,  and  A. 
Legrand,  Rijouissances  des  e'coliers 


CHAMBERS.    I 


Bb 


370 


FOLK  DRAMA 


of  schoolboys  and  of  children  generally  *.  His  prominence  in 
the  winter  processions  of  Germany  and  the  presents  which  in 
modern  folk-belief  he  brings  to  children  have  been  touched 
upon  in  an  earlier  chapter.  It  now  appears  that  originally  he 
took  rather  than  gave  presents,  and  that  where  he  appeared 
in  person  he  was  represented  by  the  Boy  Bishop.  And  this 
suggests  the  possibility  that  it  was  this  connexion  with 
St.  Nicholas,  and  not  the  profane  mummings  of  Michael  the 
Drunkard  at  Constantinople,  which  led  to  the  use  of  the  term 
'  bishop '  for  the  dominus  festi,  first  at  the  Feast  of  Boys, 
and  ultimately  at  the  other  Christmas  feasts  as  well.  For 
St.  Nicholas  was  not  only  the  boys'  saint  par  excellence ;  he 
was  also,  owing  to  the  legend  of  his  divinely  ordered  consecra- 
tion when  only  a  layman  as  bishop  of  Myra,  the  bishop  saint 
par  excellence'1.  However  this  may  be,  I  think  it  is  a  fair 
guess  that  St.  Nicholas'  day  was  an  older  date  for  a  Feast  of 
Boys  than  that  of  the  Holy  Innocents,  and  that  the  double 
date  records  an  instance  of  the  process,  generally  imperfect,  by 
which,  under  Roman  and  Christian  influence,  the  beginning  of 


de  N.-D.  de  St.  Omer,  le  jour  de 
St.-Nicholas,  leur  glorieux  patron 
(Me'tnoires,  ut  cit.  vii.  160).  The 
St.  Omer  Episcopus  puerorum  also 
officiated  on  Innocents'  Eve  and  the 
octave.  Dreves,  Anal.  Hymn.  xxi. 
82,  gives  various  cantiones  for  St. 
Nicholas'  Day;  e.g. 
'  Nicolai  praesulis 
Festum  celebremus, 

In  tanto  natalitio 
Patrum  docet  traditio 
Ut  consonet  in  gaudio 
Fidelium  devotio, 
Est  ergo  superstitio 
Vacare  a  tripudio.' 
In  England  it  is  probable  that  the 
Beverley  Boy  Bishop  also  officiated 
on  St.  Nicholas'  Day.  A  chapter  or- 
der of  Jan.  7,  1313,  directs  the  trans- 
fer of  the  '  servitium  sancti  Nicholai 
in   festo    eiusdem    per   Magistrum 
Scholarum     Beverlacensium     cele- 
brandum  '  to  the  altar  of  St.  Blaize 
during  the  building  of  a  new  nave 
(A.  F.  Leach,  Memorials  of  Bever- 
ley Minster,  Surtees  Soc.  i.  307). 


1  Tille,  D.  IV.  32;  Leach,  130. 
The  connexion  of  St.  Nicholas  with 
children  may  be  explained  by,  if  it 
did  not  rather  give  rise  to,  either 
the  legend  of  his  early  piety,  '  The 
first  day  that  he  was  washed  and 
bained,  he  addressed  him  right  up 
in  the  bason,  and  he  wold  not  take 
the  breast  nor  the  pap  but  once  on 
the  Wednesday  and  once  on  the 
Friday,  and  in  his  young  age  he 
eschewed  the  plays  and  japes  of 
other  young  children '  (Golden 
Legend,  ii.  no);  or  the  various 
other  legends  which  represent  him 
as  bringing  children  out  of  peril. 
Cf.  Golden  Legend,  ii.  119  sqq.,  and 
especially  the  history  of  the  resur- 
rection of  three  boys  from  a  pickle- 
tub  narrated  by  Mr.  Leach  from 
Wace.  A.  Maury,  Croyances  et 
Le'gendes  du  Moyen  Age  (ed.  1896), 
149)  tries  to  find  the  origin  of  this 
in  misunderstood  iconographic 
representations  of  the  missionary 
saint  at  the  baptismal  font. 

2  Leach,  130  ;  Golden  Legend,  ii. 
III. 


THE  BOY  BISHOP 


371 


winter  customs  of  the  Germano-Keltic  peoples  were  gradually 
transformed  into  mid-winter  customs 1.  The  beginning  of 
winter  feast  was  largely  a  domestic  feast,  and  the  children 
probably  had  a  special  part  in  it.  It  is  possible  also  to  trace 
a  survival  of  the  corresponding  beginning  of  summer  feast  in 
the  day  of  St.  Gregory  on  March  12,  which  was  also  sometimes 
marked  by  the  election  of  a  Schul-Bischof1. 


1  Cf.  ch.  xi.  The  position  of  St. 
Nicholas'  Day  in  the  ceremonies  dis- 
cussed in  this  chapter  is  sometimes 
shared  by  other  feasts  of  the  winter 
cycle:  St.  Edmund's  (Nov.  20), 
St.  Clement's  (Nov.  23),  St.  Cathe- 
rine's (Nov.  25),  St.  Andrew's  (Nov. 
301,  St.  Eloi's  (Dec.  1),  St.  Lucy's 
(Dec.  13).  Cf. pp. 349-51, 359,366-8. 
The  feast  of  St.  Mary  Magdalen, 


kept  in  a  Norman  convent  (p.  362), 
was,  however,  in  the  summer  (July 
22 ). 

"  2Specht,229  ;  Tille,  D.  IV.  300  ; 
Wetze  and  Welte,  iv.  141 1.  Ro- 
man schoolmasters  expected  a  pre- 
sent at  the  Minerva! ; a  (March  iS- 
23)  ;  cf.  the  passage  from  Tertullian 
in  Appendix  N  (ij. 


B  b  2 


CHAPTER  XVI 
GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS 

[Bibliographical  Note. — The  best  account  of  the  Socidtis  joyeuses  is 
that  of  L.  Petit  de  Julleville,  Les  Comddiens  en  France  au  Moyen  Age 
(1889).  Much  material  is  collected  in  the  same  writer's  Repertoire  du 
ThMtre  comique  en  France  au  Moyen  Age  (1886),  and  in  several  of  the 
books  given  as  authorities  on  the  Feast  of  Fools  (ch.  xiii),  especially  those 
of  Du  Tilliot,  Rigollot,  Leber,  and  Grenier.  Mme.  Clement  (nee  He"mery), 
Histoire  des  Fetes  civiles  et  religieuses  du  Dfyartement  du  Nord  (1832), 
may  also  be  consulted.  M.  Petit  de  Julleville's  account  of  the  Sottie  is 
supplemented  by  E.  Picot,  La  Sottie  en  France,  in  Romania,  vol.  vii,  and 
there  is  a  good  study  of  the  fool-literature  of  the  Renascence  in  C.  H. 
Herfo'rd,  Literary  Relations  between  England  and  Germany  in  the  Six- 
teenth Century  (1886).  Amongst  writers  on  the  court  fool  are  J.F.  Dreux  du 
Radier,  Histoire  des  Fous  en  Titre  d' Office,  in  Ricriations  historiques 
(1768);  C.  F.  Flogel,  Geschichte  der  Hofnarren  (1789);  F.  Douce,  Clowns 
and  Fools  of  Shakespeare  in  Variorum  Shakespeare  (1821),  xxi.  420,  and 
Illustrations  of  Shakespeare  (1839)  !  C.  Leber  in  Rigollot,  xl ;  J.  Doran, 
History  of  Court  Fools  (1858) ;  A.  F.  Nick,  Hof-  und  Volksnarren  (1861) ; 
P.  Lacroix  (le  bibliophile  Jacob)  ;  Dissertation  sur  les  Fous  des  Rois  de 
France  ;  A.  Canel,  Recherches  historiques  sur  les  Fous  des  Rois  de  France 
(1873);  A.  Gazeau,  Les  Bouffons  (1882);  P.  Moreau,  Fous  et  Bouffons 
(1885).  Much  of  this  literature  fails  to  distinguish  between  the  stultus  and 
the  ioculator  regis  (ch.  iii).  There  is  an  admirable  essay  by  L.  Johnson 
on  The  Fools  of  Shakespeare  in  Nodes  Shakesperianae  (1887).] 

The  conclusion  of  this  volume  must  call  attention  to  certain 
traces  left  by  the  ecclesiastical  ludi  of  the  New  Year,  them- 
selves extinct,  upon  festival  custom,  and,  through  this,  upon 
dramatic  tradition.  The  Feast  of  Fools  did  not  altogether 
vanish  with  its  suppression  in  the  cathedrals.  It  had  had  its 
origin  in  the  popular  celebration  of  the  Kalends.  Throughout 
it  did  not  altogether  lack  a  popular  element.  The  bourgeois 
crowded  into  the  cathedral  to  see  and  share  in  the  revel. 
The  Fool  Bishop  in  his  turn  left  the  precincts  and  made  his 
progress  through  the  city  streets,  while  his  satellites  played 
their  pranks  abroad  for  the  entertainment  of  the  mob.  The 
feast  was  a  dash  of  colour  in  the  civic  as  well  as  the  eccle- 
siastical  year.      The  Tournai  riots  of  1499  show  that  the 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS        373 

jeunesse  of  that  city  had  come  to  look  upon  it  as  a  spectacle 
which  they  were  entitled  to  claim  from  the  cathedral.  What 
happened  in  Tournai  doubtless  happened  elsewhere.  And 
the  upshot  of  it  was  that  when  in  chapter  after  chapter  the 
reforming  party  got  the  upper  hand  and  the  official  celebra- 
tion was  dropped,  the  city  and  its  jeunesse  themselves  stepped 
into  the  breach  and  took  measures  to  perpetuate  the 
threatened  delightful  dynasty.  It  was  an  easy  way  to  avert 
the  loss  of  a  holiday.  And  so  we  find  a  second  tradition  of 
Feasts  of  Fools,  in  which  the  fons  are  no  longer  vicars  but 
bourgeois \  and  the  dominus  festi  is  a  popular  '  king  '  or  '  prince  ' 
rather  than  a  clerical  '  bishop.'  A  mid-fifteenth-century 
writer,  Martin  Franc,  attests  the  vogue  of  the  prince  des  folz 
in  the  towns  of  northern  France : 

'  Va  t'en  aux  festes  a  Tournay, 

A  celles  d'Arras  et  de  Lille, 
DAmiens,  de  Douay,  de  Cambray, 

De  Valenciennes,  dAbbeville. 

La  verras  tu  des  gens  dix  mille, 
Plus  qu'en  la  forest  de  Torfolz, 

Qui  servent  par  sales,  par  viles, 
A  ton  dieu,  le  prince  des  folz1.' 

The  term  Roi  or  Prince  des  Sots  is  perhaps  the  most 
common  one  for  the  new  dominus  festi,  and,  like  sots  or  folz 
themselves,  is  generic.  But  there  are  many  local  variants,  as 
the  Pre'vot  des  fitourdis  at  Bouchain  2,  the  Roi  des  Braies 
at  Laon,  the  Roi  de  FEpinette  at  Lille,  and  the  Prince  de  la 
Jeunesse  at  St.  Quentin  3.  The  dominus  festi  was  as  a  rule 
chosen  by  one  or  more  local  guilds  or  confre'ries  into  which 
the  jeunesse  were  organized  for  the  purpose  of  maintaining  the 
feast.  The  fifteenth  century  was  an  age  of  guilds  in  every 
department  of  social  life,  and  the  compagnics  desfous  or  soci/te's 
joyeuses  are  but  the  frivolous  counterparts  of  religious  con- 
fre'ries or  literary  ptiys.  The  most  famous  of  all  such  socie'te's, 
that  of  V Infantcrie  Dijonnaise  at  Dijon,  seems  directly  trace- 

1  Martin  Franc,    Champion    des         2  Du  Tilliot,  87. 
dames  (Bibl.  de  I  Ecole  des  Chartes,         3  Julleville,  Les  Com.  241. 
v.  58). 


374 


FOLK  DRAMA 


able  to  the  fall  of  an  ecclesiastical  Feast  of  Fools.  Such 
a  feast  was  held,  as  we  have  seen,  in  the  ducal,  afterwards 
royal,  chapel,  and  was  abolished  by  the  Parlement  of  Dijon 
in  1552.  Before  this  date  nothing  is  heard  of  V Infanterie. 
A  quarter  of  a  century  later  it  is  in  full  swing,  and  the 
character  of  its  dignitaries  and  its  badges  point  clearly  to 
a  derivation  from  the  chapel  feast 1.  The  Dijon  example  is 
but  a  late  one  of  a  development  which  had  long  taken  place 
in  many  parts  of  northern  France  and  Flanders.  It  would 
be  difficult  to  assert  that  a  society  joyense  never  made  its 
appearance  in  any  town  before  the  ecclesiastical  Feast  of 
Fools  had  died  out  therein.  Occasionally  the  two  institutions 
overlap  2.  But,  roughly  speaking,  the  one  is  the  inheritor  of 
the  other;  '  La  confre'rie  des  sots,  cest  la  Fete  des  Fous 
se/cularise'ez'  Amongst  the  chief  of  these  socie'te's  are  the 
E nfants-sans-Souci  of  Paris,  the  Cornards  or  Connards  of 
Rouen  and  Evreux  4,  the  Suppots  dn  Seigneur  de  la  Coquille 


1  Julleville,  Les  Com.  193,  256  ; 
Du  Tilliot,  97.  The  chief  officers 
of  the  chapel  fous  were  the  '  baton- 
nier '  and  the  '  protonotaire  et  pro- 
cureur  des  fous.'  In  the  Infanterie 
these  are  replaced  by  the  emblemati- 
cal Mere  Folle  and  the  '  Procureur 
fiscal '  known  as  '  Fiscal  vert '  or 
'Griffon  vert'  Du  Tilliot  and  others 
have  collected  a  number  of  docu- 
ments concerning  the  Infanterie,  to- 
gether with  representations  of  seals, 
badges,  &c,  used  by  them.  These 
may  be  compared  in  Du  Tilliot  with 
the  bdton  belonging  to  the  Chapel 
period  (1482),  which  he  also  gives. 
The  motto  of  the  Infanterie  is 
worth  noticing.  It  was  Numerus 
stultorum  infinitus  est,  and  was 
taken  from  Ecclesiastes,  i.  15.  It 
was  used  also  at  Amiens  (Julle- 
ville, Les  Com.  234). 

2  At  Amiens  the  'feste  du  Prince 
des  Sots '  existed  in  1450  (Julle- 
ville, Les  Com.  233),  but  the  '  Pope 
of  Fools'  was  not  finally  suppressed 
in  the  cathedral  for  another  century. 
But  at  Amiens  there  was  an  im- 
mense multiplication  of  'fool'- 
organizations.     Each    church    and 


convent  had  its  'episcopus  puero- 
rum,'  and  several  of  these  show 
fous  on  their  coins.  Rigollot,  jj, 
105,  figures  a  coin  v/khfous,  which 
he  assigns  to  a  confre'rie  in  the 
parish  of  St.  Remigius  ;  also  a  coin, 
dated  1 543,  of  an  '  Evesque  des 
Griffons.' 

3  Julleville,  Les  Com.  144. 

*  The  term  cornard  seems  to  be 
derived  from  the  '  cornes '  of  the 
traditional  fool  headdress.  Leber, 
ix.  353,  reprints  from  the  Mercure 
de  France  for  April,  1725,  an  ac- 
count of  a  procession  made  by 
the  abbas  cornardorum  at  Evreux 
mounted  upon  an  ass,  which  di- 
rectly recalls  the  Feast  of  Fools. 
A  macaronic  chanson  used  on  the 
occasion  of  one  of  these  processions 
is  preserved : 
'  De  asino  bono  nostro, 

Meliori  et  optimo, 

Debemus  faire  fete. 

En  revenant  de  Gravignaria, 

Un  gros  chardon  rcperit  in  via ; 

II  lui  coupa  la  tete. 

Vir  monachus,  in  mense  Iulio, 

Egressus  est  e  monasterio, 

Cest  dom  de  la  Bucaille. 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         375 

of  Lyons  1.  The  history  of  these  has  been  written  excellently 
well  by  M.  Petit  de  Julleville,  and  I  do  not  propose  to  repeat 
it.     A  few  general  points,  however,  deserve  attention. 

The  ecclesiastical  Feast  of  Fools  flourished  rather  in 
cathedrals  than  in  monasteries.  The  societc's  however,  like 
some  more  serious  confr tries 2,  seem  to  have  preferred  a  con- 
ventual to  a  capitular  model  for  their  organization 3.  The 
Cornards,  both  at  Rouen  and  Evreux,  were  under  an  AbbL 
Cambrai  had  its  Abbaye  joyease  de  Lescache-Profit,  Chalons- 
sur-Saone  its  Abbt  de  la  Grande  Abbaye,  Arras  its  Abbe  de 
Liesse,  Poitiers  its  Abb/  de  Man  Gouverne*.  The  literary 
adaptation  of  this  idea  by  Rabelais  in  the  Abbaye  de  Tktflhne 
is  familiar.  This  term  abbaye  is  common  to  the  soci^tes,  with 
some  at  least  of  the  Basochcs  or  associations  of  law-clerks  to 
the  Parlements  of  Paris  and  the  greater  provincial  towns. 
The  Basoches  existed  for  mutual  protection,  but  for  mutual 
amusement  also,  and  on  one  side  at  least  of  their  activity 
they  were  much  of  the  nature  of  socittes  joyeuses 5.  At  Rheims 
in  1490'  b.  Basoche  entered  into  rivalry  of  dramatic  invective 
with  the  celebrants  of  the  ecclesiastical  Feast  of  Fools 6.  The 
Basoche  of  Paris  was  in  the  closest  relations  to,  if  not  actually 
identical  with,  the  socie'te  of  the  Enfants-sans-Souci 7.    Just  as 

Egressus  est  sine  licentid,  Confratriae ;  quoting  a  Paris  exam- 
Pour  aller  voir  donna  Venissia,  pie.     Grenier,  362,  however,  men- 
Et  faire  la  ripaille.'  tions  a  'confrerie'  in  the  Hopital  de 
Research  has  identified  Dom  de  la  Rue  at  Amiens  (ti2io)  which  was 
Bucaille   and   Donna   Venissia    as  under  an  '£veque'  ;  cf.  the  following 
respectively  a  prior  of  St.  Taurfn,  note. 

and  a  prioress  of  St.  Saviour's,  in  3  I  find  an  '  dvesque  des  folz  '  at 

Evreux.  Bdthune,  a  'M.  le  Cardinal '  as  head 

1  A  coquille  is  a  misprint,  and  of  the  'Joyeux'  at  Rheims  (Julle- 

this   socie'te'  was    composed  of  the  ville,  Les  Com.  242;  Rep.  Com.  340), 

printers  of  Lyon.  and  an  ' dvesque  des  Griffons'  at 

3  C071C.  of  Avignon  (1326),  c.  37,  Amiens  (Rigollot,  105).  Exceptional 

de    societatibus    colligationibus    et  is,  I  believe,  the  Socie'te  des  Foux 

coniurationibus    quas    confratrias  founded  on  the  lines  of  a  chivalric 

appellant      radicitus     extirpandis  order  by  Adolphe,  Comte  de  Cleves, 

(Labbe\    xi.    1738),    forbids     both  in  1380  (Du  Tilliot,  84). 

clerks  and  laymen  '  ne  se  confratres  4  Julleville,  236  ;  Guy,  471. 

priores   abbatas    praedictae   socie-  6  Julleville,  88,  136.     The  Paris 

tatis      appellent.'      The      charges  Basoche  was  a  'royaume'  ;  those  of 

brought  against  the  confriries  are  Chambery  and  Geneva  were  '  ab- 

of  perverting  justice,  not  of  wanton  bayes.' 

revelry,  and  therefore  it  is  probably  6  Cf.  p.  304. 

not  '  societes  joyeuses'  that  are  in  7  Julleville,  Les  Com.  152. 
question  ;  cf.  Ducange,  s.  v.  Abbas 


376  FOLK  DRAMA 

the  law-clerks  of  Paris  were  banded  together  in  their  Basocke, 
so  were  the  students  of  Paris  in  their  '  university,'  '  faculties,' 
'  nations,'  and  other  groups  ;  and  in  1470,  long  after  the 
regular  Feast  of  Fools  had  disappeared  from  the  city,  the 
students  were  still  wont  to  put  on  the  fool  habit  and  elect 
their  rex  fatuorum  on  Twelfth  night  *.  Yet  other  guilds  of 
a  more  serious  character,  generally  speaking,  than  the  sociitis 
joyeuses,  none  the  less  occasionally  gave  themselves  over  to 
joyeusete'.  The  Deposuit  brought  rebuke  upon  religious  con- 
fr tries  up  to  a  quite  late  date2  ;  and  traces  of  the  fotis  are  to 
be  found  amongst  the  recreations  of  no  less  a  body  than  the 
famous  and  highly  literary  puy  of  Arras.  The  sociHh  joyeuses, 
like  the  puys,  were  primarily  associations  of  amateur,  rather 
than  professional  merry-makers,  a  fact  which  distinguishes 
them  from  the  corporations  of  minstrels  described  in  a  previous 
chapter 3.  But  minstrels  and  trouveres  were  by  no  means 
excluded.  The  poet  Gringoire  was  Mere-Sotte  of  the  Paris 
Enfants-sans-Souci.  Clement  Marot  was  a  member  of  the 
same  body.  In  the  puy  of  Arras  the  minstrels  traditionally 
held  an  important  place ;  and  as  the  literary  and  dramatic 
side  of  the  socie'te's  grew,  it  is  evident  that  the  men  who  were 


1  Bulaeus,  Hist.  Univ.  Paris,  v.  Iacobi  Paris,  (sixteenth  century), 
690  ;  Julleville,  Les  Com.  297  ;  '  apres  le  diner,  on  porte  le  baton 
Rashdall,  Universities  of  Europe,  au  cueur,  et  la  est  le  tre"sorier,  qui 
ii.  611.  It  was  probably  to  this  chante  et  fait  le  Deposuit!  Stat. 
student  custom  that  the  Tournai  Syn.  Petri  de  Broc.  episc.  Autiss. 
rioters  of  1499  appealed  (cf.  p.  301).  (J642)  'pendant  que  les  batons 
In  1470  the  Faculty  of  Arts  ordered  de  confnfrie  seront  exposez,  pour 
the  suppression  of  it.  Cf.  C.  Jour-  etre  encheris,  Ton  ne  chantera  Mag- 
dain,  Index  Chartarum  Paris.  294  nificat,  et  n'appliquera-t-on  point 
(No.  1369).  On  Jan.  5  they  met  ces  versets  Deposuit  et  Suscepit  a 
'  ad  providendum  remedium  de  la  delivrance  d'iceux ;  ains  on  chan- 
electione  regis  fatuorum,'  and  de-  tera  quelque  antienne  et  repons 
creed  'quod  nullus  scolaris  assu-  avec  l'oraison  propre  en  l'honneur 
meret  habitum  fatui  pro  illo  anno,  du  Saint,  duquel  on  celebre  la 
nee  in  collegio,  nee  extra  collegium,  feste.' 

nisi  forsan  duntaxat  ludendo  farsam  s  Cf.  ch.   iii   and   Appendix   F; 

vel  moralitatem.'     Several  scholars  and  on  the  general  character  of  the 

'  portantes     arma    et    assumentes  puys,  Julleville,  Les  Com.  42  ;  Guy, 

habitus   fatuorum'  were  corrected  xxxiv  ;    Paris,    185.      Some   docu- 

on  Jan.  24,  and  it  was  laid  down  ments  with  regard  to  a  fourteenth- 

that  'reges  vero  fatuorum  priventur  century  puy  in  London  are  in  Riley, 

penitus  a  gradu  quocumque.'  Liber  Custumarum,  xlviii.  216,  479 

2  Grenier,  365  ;  Ducange,  s.  v.  (Munim.  Cildh.  Lond.  in  R.  S.) ; 
Deposuit,  quoting  Stat.  Hosp.  S.  Memorials  of  London,  42. 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         377 

professionally  ready  with  their  pens  must  everywhere  have 
been  in  demand. 

The  primary  function  of  the  socie'te's  joyeuses  and  their 
congeners  was  the  celebration  of  the  traditional  Feast  of 
Fools  at  or  about  the  New  Year.  In  Paris,  Twelfth  night 
was  a  day  of  festival  for  the  Basoche  as  well  as  for  the  minor 
association  of  exchequer  clerks  known  as  the  Empire  de 
Galilee.  In  mid-January  came  the  fete  des  Braies  at  Laon, 
and  the  fete  of  the  Abbaye  de  Lescacke-Profit  at  Cambrai. 
That  of  the  Prince  des  Sots  at  Amiens  was  on  the  first  of 
January  itself1.  On  the  same  day  three  socie'te's  joyeuses 
united  in  a  fete  de  I'dne  at  Douai 2.  But  January  was  no 
clement  month  for  the  elaborated  revels  of  increasingly 
luxurious  burghers;  and  it  is  not  surprising  to  find  that 
many  of  the  socie'te's  transferred  their  attention  to  other 
popular  feasts  which  happened  to  fall  at  more  genial  seasons 
of  the  year.  To  the  celebration  of  these,  the  spring  feast  of 
the  carnival  or  Shrovetide,  the  summer  feasts  of  May-day 
or  Midsummer,  they  brought  all  the  wantonness  of  the  Feast 
of  Fools.  The  Infanterie  Dijonnaise,  the  Cornards  of  Rouen 
and  Evreux,  the  third  Parisian  law  association,  that  of  the 
Chatelet,  especially  cultivated  the  carnival.  The  three 
obligatory  feasts  of  the  Basoche  included,  besides  that  of 
Twelfth  night,  one  on  May-day  and  one  at  the  beginning 
of  July  3.  On  May-day,  too,  a  guild  in  the  parish  of  St.  Ger- 
main at  Amiens  held  its  fete  desfous  4.    It  may  be  noted  that 

1  Julleville,    Les    Com.  92,   233,  the  Saturday  before  the  first  Sunday 
236,  241.  in  May  children  in  the  rue  St.  Ger- 

2  Cle'ment-He'mery,     Fetes     du  main  carry  boughs,  singing 
Dip.  du  Nord,  184,  states  on  the  <  Saint  Germain,  coucou, 
authority   of   a   MS.  without  title  Ch'est  l'fette  d'che"s  fous,  &c.' 
or  signature  that  this  /^originated  In  Ae  church  ±       used  tQ     lace 
m  a  prose  wuh  a  bray  mt  it,  sung  &     boUle     crowned     with     yellow 
by  the  canons  of  St.  Peter  s.     The  rimroses    called  <  Coucous.*     The 
lay  form  of  the  feast  can  be  traced  gwellers  in  the        ish  are   Iocally 
from  ti476  to  1668.     Leber,  x.  135,  known  as  <fous  -  and  an  historical 
puts    the    (clerical)    origin    before  myth  .g   toW   tQ  account  for  this. 

1  ,  ,'  „  ^  .        Probably  May-day  has  here  merged 

Julleville,   Les    Com.   92,   204,      with  St/Germain's  Day  (May  2)  in 

24Zv   ^    ,  r       t-       j    c    ■  /       a    'fete   des  fous.'     Payments    for 

*  F.  GueVard,Z^  Fous  de  Saint-      decki       the  church  appear  in  old 

GJTT\  Am  •  AManHS ,    2     ni     accounts. 
d  Arch.  (Amiens,   1861),   17.    On 


378  FOLK  DRAMA 

these  summer  extensions  of  the  reign  of  folly  are  not  without 
parallels  of  a  strictly  ecclesiastical  type.  At  Chalons-sur- 
Marne,  as  late  as  1648,  a  chapter  procession  went  to  the 
woods  on  St.  John's  eve  to  cut  boughs  for  the  decking  of 
the  church  l.  At  Evreux  a  similar  custom  grew  into  a  very 
famous  revel 2.  This  was  the  procession  noire,  otherwise 
known  as  the  ce're'monic  de  la  Saint-  Vital,  because  the  pro- 
ceedings began  on  the  day  of  St.  Vitalis  (April  28)  and  lasted 
to  the  second  Vespers  on  May  1.  Originally  the  canons, 
afterwards  the  choir-clerks,  chaplains,  and  vicars,  went  at  day- 
break on  May  morning  to  gather  branches  in  the  bishop's 
woods.  Their  return  was  the  signal  for  riotous  proceedings. 
The  bells  were  violently  rung.  Masks  were  worn.  Bran  was 
thrown  in  the  eyes  of  passers-by,  and  they  were  made  to  leap 
over  broomsticks.  The  choir-clerks  took  the  high  stalls,  and 
the  choir-boys  recited  the  office.  In  the  intervals  the  canons 
played  at  skittles  over  the  vaults ;  there  were  dancing  and 
singing  and  the  rest,  '  as  at  the  time  of  the  Nativity  3.'  The 
abuses  of  this  festival  must  have  begun  at  an  early  date,  for 
two  canons  of  the  cathedral,  one  of  whom  died  in  1206,  are 
recorded  to  have  been  hung  out  of  the  belfry  windows  in 
a  vain  attempt  to  stop  the  bell-ringing.  Its  extension  to 
St.  Vitalis'  day  is  ascribed  to  another  canon,  singularly  named 
Bouteille,  who  is  said  to  have  founded  about  1270  a  very  odd 
obit.  He  desired  that  a  pall  should  lie  on  the  pavement  of 
the  choir,  and  that  on  each  corner  and  in  the  middle  of  this 
should  stand  a  bottle  of  wine,  to  be  drunk  by  the  singing-men. 
The  canon  Bouteille  may  be  legendary,  but  the  wine-bottle 
figured  largely  in  the  festival  ceremonies.  While  the  branches 
were  distributed  in  the  bishop's  wood,  which  came  to  be 
known  as  the  bois  de  la  Bouteille,  the  company  drank  and 
ate  cakes.  Two  bottle-shaped  holes  were  dug  in  the  earth 
and  filled  with  sand.  On  the  day  of  the  obit  an  enormous 
leather  bottle,  painted  with  marmosets,  serpents,  and  other 
grotesques,  was  placed  in  the  choir.     These  rites  were  still 

1  Gue'rard,  op.  cit.  46.  ecclesiae  .  .  .  faciunt  podia,  choreas 

2  Leber,  x.  125,  from  Mercure  de  et    choros  .  .  .  et   reliqua   sicut   in 
France  for  April,  1726  ;  Gaste,  46.  natalibus.' 

3  '  ludunt  ad  quillas  super  voltas 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         379 

extant  at  Evreux  in  1462,  when  a  fresh  attempt  to  suppress 
the  bell-jangling  led  to  a  fresh  riot.  No  explanation  is  given 
of  the  term  procession  noire  as  used  at  Evreux,  but  a  Vienne 
parallel  suggests  that,  as  in  some  other  seasonal  festivals, 
those  who  took  part  in  the  procession  had  their  faces  blacked. 
At  Vienne,  early  on  May  1,  four  men,  naked  and  black, 
started  from  the  archbishop's  palace  and  paraded  the  city. 
They  were  chosen  respectively  by  the  archbishop,  the  cathedral 
chapter,  and  the  abbots  of  St.  Peter's  and  St.  John's.  Subse- 
quently they  formed  a  cortege  for  a  rex,  also  chosen  by  the 
archbishop,  and  a  regina  from  the  convent  of  St.  Andrew's. 
A  St.  Paul,  from  the  hospital  dedicated  to  that  saint,  also 
joined  in  the  procession,  and  carried  a  cup  of  ashes  which  he 
sprinkled  in  the  faces  of  those  he  met.  This  custom  lasted  to 
the  seventeenth  century  1. 

But  the  seasonal  feasts  did  not  exhaust  the  activities  of  the 
societh.  Occasional  events,  a  national  triumph,  a  royal  entry, 
not  to  speak  of  local  fails  divers,  found  them  ready  with 
appropriate  celebrations  2.  The  Infanterie  Dijonnaise  made 
a  solemn  function  of  the  admission  of  new  members  3.  And 
more  than  one  socic'te'  picked  up  from  folk-custom  the  tradition 
of  the  charivari,  constituting  itself  thus  the  somewhat  arbitrary 
guardian  of  burgess  morality  4.  M.  Petit  de  Julleville  analyses 
a  curious  jen  filled  with  chaff  against  an  unfortunate  M.  Du 
Tillet  who  underwent  the  penalty  at  Dijon  in  1579  for  the 
crime  of  beating  his  wife  in  the  month  of  May5.  At  Lyon, 
too,  chevaziche'es  of  a  similar  type  seem  to  have  been  much  in 
vogue  6. 

In  the  fifteenth  and  sixteenth  centuries  the  entertainment 
of  the  socie'te's  joyensos  was  largely  dramatic.     We  find  them, 

1  Leber,  ix.  261.  s  Ibid.  214. 

2  Julleville,  Les  Com.  233,  quotes  4  Cf.  ch.  vii. 

a    decree    of    the   municipality   of  B  Julleville,  Les  Com.  209. 

Amiens  in   1450,  '  II  a  este  dit  et  6  Leber,  ix.  150,  reprints  the  Re- 

declairie"  qu'il  semble  que  ce  sera  cueil  de  la  Chevanche'e  faicte  en  la 

tres    grande    recreacion,  consider^  Ville  de  Lyon  le  dix  septiesme  de 

les  bonnes  nouvelles  que  de  jour  en  novembre,    1578.      Another     Lyon 

jour  en  disoit  du  Roy  nostre  sire,  Recueil  dates  from  1566.     Cf.  Julle- 

et  que  le  ducde  de  Normendie  est  ville,  Les  Com.  234  (Amiens),  243 

du  tout  reunye  en  sa  main,  de  fere  (Lyon),  248  (Rouen). 
la  feste  du  Prince  des  Sots.' 


380 


FOLK  DRAMA 


as  indeed  we  find  the  participants  in  the  strictly  clerical  feasts 
of  Fools 1  and  of  Boys 2,  during  the  same  period,  occupied 
with  the  performance  both  of  miracles  and  of  the  various 
forms  of  contemporary  comedy  known  as  farces,  moralities, 
sotties  and  sermons  joyeux 3.  Of  their  share  in  the  miracles 
the  next  volume  may  speak  4  :  their  relations  to  the  develop- 
ment of  comedy  require  a  word  or  two  here.  That  normal 
fifteenth-century  comedy,  that  of  the  farce  and  the  morality, 
in  any  way  had  its  origin  in  the  Feast  of  Fools,  whether 
clerical  or  lay,  can  hardly  be  admitted.  It  almost  certainly 
arose  out  of  the  minstrel  tradition,  and  when  already  a  full- 
blown art  was  adapted  by  the  fous,  as  by  other  groups  of 
amateur  performers,  from  minstrelsy.  With  the  special  forms 
of  the  sottie  and  the  sermon  joyeux  it  is  otherwise.  These 
may  reasonably  be  regarded  as  the  definite  contribution  of 


1  Cf.  chs.  xiii,  xiv.  The  theatrales 
ludi  of  Pope  Innocent  Ill's  decree 
in  1207  probably  refers  only  to  the 
burlesque  '  offices '  of  the  feasts 
condemned  ;  and  even  the  terms 
used  by  the  Theological  Faculty  in 
1445 — spectacula,  ludi  theatrales ; 
personagiorum  ludi — might  mean 
no  more,  for  at  Troyes  in  the  pre- 
vious year  the  '  jeu  du  sacre  de  leur 
arcevesque '  was  called  a  '  jeu  de 
personnages,'  and  this  might  have 
been  a  mere  burlesque  consecration. 
However,  'jeu  de  personnages' 
generally  implies  something  dis- 
tinctly dramatic  (cf.  ch.  xxiv).  It 
recurs  in  the  Sens  order  of  151 1. 
The  Beauvais  Daniel  was  possibly 
played  at  a  Feast  of  Fools:  at  Tours 
a  Prophetae  and  a  miraculum  ap- 
pear under  similar  conditions ;  at 
Autun  a  Herod  gave  a  name  to  the 
dominus  festi.  At  Laon  there  were 
'mysteries'  in  1464  and  1465;  by 
1 53 1  these  had  given  way  to  '  come- 
dies.' Farces  were  played  at  Tour- 
nai  in  1498  and  comedies  at  Lille 
in  1526. 

2  Cf.  ch.  xv.  The  Toul  Sta- 
tutes of  1497  mention  the  playing 
of  miracles,  morals,  and  farces.  At 
Laon  the  playing  of  a  comedy  had 
been  dropped  before  1546. 

3  Julleville,  Rip.  Com.  321  (Cata- 


logue des  representations),  and  else- 
where, gives  many  examples.  The 
following  decree  (ti327)  of  Domi- 
nique Grima,  bishop  of  Pamiers,  is 
quoted  by  L.  Delisle,  in  Romania, 
xxii.  274 :  '  Dampnamus  autem  et 
anathematizamus  ludum  cenicum 
vocatum  Centum  Drudorum,  vul- 
gariter  Cent  Drutz,  actenus  obser- 
vatum  in  nostra  dyocesi,  et  speciali- 
ter  in  nostra  civitate  Appamiensi 
et  villa  de  Fuxo,  per  clericos  et 
laycos  interdum  magni  status  ;  in 
quo  ludo  effigiabantur  prelati  et 
religiosi  graduum  et  ordinum  diver- 
sorum,  facientes  processionem  cum 
candelis  de  cepo,  et  vexilis  in  quibus 
depicta  erant  membra  pudibunda 
hominis et  mulieris.  Induebant etiam 
confratres  illius  ludi  masculos  iuve- 
nes  habitu  muliebri  et  deducebant 
eos  processionaliter  ad  quendam 
quern  vocabant  priorem  dicti  ludi, 
cum  carminibus  inhonestissima 
verba  continentes  . .  .'  The  con- 
frates  and  the  prior  here  look  like 
a  sociitd  joyeuse,  but  the  '  ludus 
cenicus  '  was  probably  less  a  regular 
play  than  a  dramatized  bit  of  folk- 
ritual,  like  the  Troyes  Sacre  de 
F arcevesque  and  the  Charivaris. 
The  change  of  sex-costume  is  to  be 
noted. 

4  Cf.  ch.  xx. 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         381 

the  Feast  of  Fools  to  the  types  of  comedy.     The  very  name 
of  the  sermon  joyeux,  indeed,  sufficiently  declares  its  deriva- 
tion.    It  is  parody  of  a  class,  the  humour  of  which  would 
particularly  appeal  to  revelling  clerks :  it  finds  its  place  in  the 
general  burlesque  of  divine  worship,  which  is  the  special  note 
of  the  feast  *.     The  character  of  the  sotties,  again,  does  not 
leave  their  origin  doubtful  ;    they  are,  on  the  face  of  them, 
farces  in  which  the  actors  are  sots  or  fous.     Historically,  we 
know  that  some  at  least  of  the  extant  sotties  were  played  by 
socie'th  joyeuses  at    Paris,  Geneva  and    elsewhere  ;    and   the 
analysis  of  their  contents  lays  bare  the  ruling  idea  as  precisely 
that  expressed  in  the  motto  of  the  Infanterie  Dijonnaise — 
c  Stultorum   numerus  est  infinitus!     It  is  their  humour  and 
their  mode  of  satire  to  represent  the  whole  world,  from  king 
to  clown,  as  wearing  the  cap  and  bells,  and  obeying  the  lord- 
ship of  folly.     French  writers  have  aptly  compared  them  to 
the  modern  dramatic  type  known  as  the  revue  2.     The  germ 
of  the  sottie  is  to  be  found  as  early  as  the  thirteenth  century 
in  the  work  of  that  Adan  de  la  Hale,  whose  anticipation  of 
at  least  one  other  form  of  fifteenth-century  drama  has  called 
for  comment 3.     Adan's  jfeu  de  la  FeuilUe  seems  to  have  been 
played  before  the  puy  of  Arras,  perhaps,  as  the  name  suggests, 
in  the  tonnelle  of  a  garden,  on  the  eve  of  the  first  of  May,  1262. 
It  is  composed  of  various  elements:  the  later  scenes  are  a 
fforie  in  which  the   author  draws  upon    Hellequin  and  his 
mesnie  and  the  three  f/es,  Morgue,  Maglore    and  Arsile,  of 
peasant  tradition.     But  there  is  an  episode  which  is  sheer 
sottie.     The  relics  of  St.  Acaire,  warranted  to  cure  folly,  are 

1  Julleville,   Les  Com.   33 ;     La  La  Com.  68  ;   E.  Picot,  La  Sottie 

Com.  73    '  Le  premier  qui   s'avisa,  en    France    {Romania,    vii.    236). 

pendant   l'ivresse   bruyante    de    la  Jean   Bouchet,  E-pltres  morales  et 

fete,    de    monter    dans    la    chaire  familieres  du    Traverseur  (1545), 

chre"tienne  et  d'y  parodier  le  prddi-  i.  32,  thus  defines  the  Sottie : 

cateur     dans     une     improvisation  '  En   France  elle  a   de  sotie  le 

burlesque,  d<£bita  le  premier  sermon  nom, 

joyeux.     C'est   a  Porigine,  comme  Parce   que   sotz    des    gens    de 

nous    avons    dit,   "  une    inde"cente  grand  renom 

plaisanterie    de   sacristain   en    go-  Et  des  petits  jouent  les  grands 

guette."  '     A  list  of  extant  sermons  follies 

joyeux  is  given  by  Julleville,  Rdp.  Sur     eschaffaux     en     parolles 

Com.  259.  polies.' 

•Julleville,  Les   Com.   32,   145;  s  Cf.  ch.  viii. 


382  FOLK  DRAMA 

tried  upon  the  good  burgesses  of  Arras  one  by  one  ;  and  there 
is  a  genuine  fool  or  dervfc,  who,  like  his  lineal  descendant 
Touchstone,  'uses  his  folly  as  a  stalking-horse  to  shoot  his 
wit '  in  showers  of  arrowy  satire  upon  mankind  \  Of  the 
later  and  regular  sotties,  the  most  famous  are  those  written 
by  Pierre  Gringoire  for  the  Enfants-sans-Souci  of  Paris.  In 
these,  notably  the  Jett  dn  Prince  des  Sotz,  and  in  others  by  less 
famous  writers,  the  conception  of  the  all-embracing  reign  of 
folly  finds  constant  and  various  expression  2.  Outside  France 
some  reflection  of  the  sot  tie  is  to  be  found  in  the  Fastnacht- 
spiele  or  Shrovetide  plays  of  Nuremberg  and  other  German 
towns.  These  were  performed  mainly,  but  not  invariably,  at 
Shrovetide,  by  students  or  artisans,  not  necessarily  organized 
into  regular  guilds.  They  are  dramatically  of  the  crudest, 
being  little  more  than  processions  of  figures,  each  of  whom  in 
turn  sings  his  couplets.  But  in  several  examples  these  figures 
are  a  string  of  Narren,  and  the  matter  of  the  verses  is  in  the 
satirical  vein  of  the  sotties 3.  The  Fastnachtspielc  are  probably 
to  be  traced,  not  so  much  to  the  Feast  of  Fools  proper,  as  to 
the  spring  sword-dances  in  which,  as  we  have  seen,  a  Narr  or 
'  fool '  is  de  rigueur.  They  share,  however,  with  the  sotties 
their  fundamental  idea  of  the  universal  domination  of  folly. 

The  extension  of  this  idea  may  indeed  be  traced  somewhat 
widely  in  the  satirical  and  didactic  literature  of  the  later 
Middle  Ages  and  the  Renascence.  I  cannot  go  at  length  into 
this  question  here,  but  must  content  myself  with  referring  to 
Professor  Herford's  valuable  account  of  the  cycle,  which 
includes  the  Speculum  Stultorum  of  Wireker,  Lydgate's  Order 

1  Creizenach,  i.  395  ;  Julleville,  and  E.  Picot,  in  Romania,  vii. 
Les  Com.  46;    La  Com.  19;    Rep.      249. 

Com.    20;    E.  Langlois,  Robin   et  3  Creizenach,  i.  406  ;  G.Gregory 

Marion,  13;  Guy,  337;   M.  Sepet,  Smith,     Transition    Period,    317; 

Le  Jeu  de  la  Feuillde,  in  F.tudes  Goedeke,  Deutsche  Dichtung,\.  325; 

romaines   dediees   a   G.  Paris,  69.  V.  Michels,  Studien  iiber  die  altes- 

The  play  is    sometimes   called  Le  ten  deutschen  Fastnaciitspiele,  101. 

Jeu  d 'Adam.     The  text  is  printed  in  The  latter  writer  inclines  to  con- 

Monmerque     et     Michel,     Theatre  sider  the  Narr  of  these  plays  as 

frangais  au   Moyen   Age,  55,  and  substituted  by  fifteenth  century  for 

E.   de    Coussemaker,   CEuvres    de  a  more  primitive  7  °ufel.   The  plays 

Adam  de  la  Halle,  297.  themselves  are  collected  by  A.  von 

2  The  extant  sotties  are  cata-  Keller,  Fastnachtspiele  aus  dem  15. 
logued  by  Julleville,  Rep.  Com.  104,  Jahrhundcrt  (1853-8). 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS 


383 


of  Fools,  Sebastian  Brandt's  Narrcnschijf  and  its  innumerable 
imitations,  the  Encomium  Moriae  of  Erasmus,  and  Robert 
Armin  the  player's  Nest  of  Ninnies  '. 

Wireker  was  an  Englishman,  and  the  '  Order '  founded  in 
the  Speculum  by  Brunellus,  the  Ass,  was  clearly  suggested  by 
the  societds  joyeuses.  Traces  of  such  socie'tc's  in  England  are, 
however,  rare.  Some  of  the  titles  of  local  lords  of  misrule, 
such  as  the  Abbot  of  Marrall  at  Shrewsbury  or  the  Abbot  of 
Bon-Accord  at  Aberdeen,  so  closely  resemble  the  French 
nomenclature  as  to  suggest  their  existence  ;  but  the  only 
certain  example  I  have  come  across  is  in  a  very  curious  record 
from  Exeter.  The  register  of  Bishop  Grandisson  contains 
under  the  date  July  1 1,  1348,  a  mandate  to  the  archdeacon  and 
dean  of  Exeter  and  the  rector  of  St.  Paul's,  requiring  them  to 
prohibit  the  proceedings  of  a  certain  '  sect  of  malign  men ' 
who  call  themselves  the  '  Order  of  Brothelyngham.'  These 
men,  says  the  bishop,  wear  a  monkish  habit,  choose  a  lunatic 
fellow  as  abbot,  set  him  up  in  the  theatre,  blow  horns,  and 
for  day  after  day  beset  in  a  great  company  the  streets  and 
places  of  the  city,  capturing  laity  and  clergy,  and  exacting 
ransom  from  them  '  in  lieu  of  a  sacrifice.'  This  they  call 
a  Indus,  but  it  is  sheer  rapine  2.     Grandisson's  learned  editor 


1  C.  H.  Herford,  Literary  Rela- 
tions of  England  and  Germany, 
323  sqq.  ;  cf.  G.  Gregory  Smith, 
op.  cil.  176.  On  an  actual  pseudo- 
chivalric  Order  of  Fools  cf.  p.  375. 

2  F.  C.  Hingeston- Randolph, 
Register  of  Bishop  Grandisson,  ii. 
105 5,  Litera pro  iniqua fraternitate 
de  Brothelyngham.  '  Ad  nostrum, 
siquidem,  non  sine  inquietudine 
gravi,  pervenit  auditum,  quod  in 
Civitate  nostra  Exonie  secta  que- 
dam  abhominabilis  quorundam 
hominum  malignorum,  sub  nomine 
Ordinis,  quin  pocius  erroris,  de 
Brothelyngham,  procurante  satore 
malorum  operum,noviter  insurrexit; 
qui,  non  Conventum  sed  conventi- 
culamfacientesevidenter  illicitam  et 
suspectam,  quemdam  lunaticum  et 
delirum,  ipsorum  utique  operibus 
aptissime  congruentem,  sibi,  sub 
Abbatis  nomine,  prefecerunt,  ipsum- 
que     Monachali    habitu    induentes 


ac  in  Theatro  constitutum  velut 
ipsorum  idolum  adorantes,  ad  fla- 
tum  cornu,  quod  sibi  statuerunt  pro 
campana,  per  Civitatis  eiusdem 
vicos  et  plateas,  aliquibus  iam 
elapsis  diebus,  cum  maxima  equi- 
tum  et  peditum  multitudine  com- 
mitarunt  [sic]  ;  clericos  eciam 
laicos  ceperunt  eis  obviam  tunc 
prestantes,  ac  aliquos  de  ipsorum 
domibus  extraxerunt,  et  invitos  tarn 
diu  ausu  temerario  et  interdum 
sacrilego  tenuerunt,  donee  certas 
pecuniarum  summas  loco  sacrificii, 
quin  verius  sacrilegii,  extorserunt 
ab  eisdem.  Et  quamvis  hec  vide- 
antur  sub  colore  et  velamine  ludi, 
immo  ludibrii,  attemptari,  furtum 
est,  tamen,  proculdubio,  in  eo 
quod  ab  invitis  capitur  et  rapina.' 
There  is  no  such  place  as  Bro- 
thelyngham, but '  brethelyng'  'bre- 
thel,'  'brothel,'  mean  'good-for- 
nothing  '  (N.E.D.,  s.vv.). 


384  FOLK  DRAMA 

thinks  that  this  secta  was  a  sect  of  mediaeval  dissenters,  but 
the  description  clearly  points  to  a  socie'te'  joyeuse.  And  the 
recognition  of  the  droits  exacted  as  being  loco  sacrificii  is  to 
a  folk-lorist  most  interesting. 

More  than  one  of  the  records  which  I  have  had  occasion  to 
quote  make  mention  of  an  habit  des  fousas  of  a  recognized  and 
familiar  type  of  dress.  These  records  are  not  of  the  earliest. 
The  celebrants  of  the  ecclesiastical  Feast  of  Fools  wore  larvae 
or  masks.  Laity  and  clergy  exchanged  costumes :  and  the 
wearing  of  women's  garments  by  men  probably  represents 
one  of  the  most  primitive  elements  in  the  custom.  But  there 
can  be  little  doubt  as  to  the  nature  of  the  traditional  'habit 
des  fous'  from  the  fourteenth  century  onwards.  Its  most 
characteristic  feature  was  that  hood  garnished  with  ears,  the 
distribution  of  which  to  persons  of  importance  gave  such 
offence  at  Tournai  in  1499.  A  similar  hood,  fitting  closely 
over  the  head  and  cut  in  scollops  upon  the  shoulders,  re- 
appears in  the  bdlon,  dated  1482,  of  the  fools  in  the  ducal 
chapel  of  Dijon.  Besides  two  large  asses'  ears,  it  also  bears 
a  central  peak  or  crest *.  The  eared  hood  became  the  regular 
badge  of  the  sociith  joyeuses.  It  is  found  on  most  of  the  seals 
and  other  devices  of  the  Infanterie  Dijonnaise,  variously 
modified,  and  often  with  bells  hung  upon  the  ears  and  the  points 
of  the  scollops  2.  It  was  used  at  Amiens  3,  and  at  Rouen  and 
Evreux  probably  gave  a  name  to  the  Cornards*.  Marot 
describes  it  as  appropriate  to  a  sot  de  la  Basoche  at  Paris5. 
It  belongs  also  to  the  Narren  of  Nuremberg6,  and  is  to  be 
seen  in  innumerable  figured  representations  of  fools  in 
miniatures,  woodcuts,  carvings,  the  Amiens  monetae,  and  so 
forth,  during  the  later  Middle  Ages  and  the  Renascence 7. 

1  Du  Tilliot,  pi.  4.  Aussi  bien  painct  qu'il  est  pos- 

2  Ibid.  pll.  1-12  passim.  sible.' 

8  Julleville,  Les  Com.  234.  For  other  Paris  evidence  cf.  Julle- 

*  Ibid.  246  ;  Rigollot,  lxxxiv.  ville,  Les  Com.  144,  147 ;  E.  Picot, 

6  Ma.rot,  Eflistre  du  Cot?  enTAsne  in  Romania,  vii.  242. 

(ed.  Jannet,  i.  224  ;    ed.  Guiffrey,  '  Picot,   in    Romania,  vii.   245  ; 

iii.  352)  :  Keller,  Fastnachtspiele,  258. 

'  Attachez  moy  une  sonnette  7  Rigollot,  73,  166,  and  passim  ; 

Sur  le  front  d'un  moyne  crotte",  Strutt,   222;    Douce,    516;    Julle- 

Une  aureille  a  chaque  coste"  ville,   Les  Com.    147.      There   are 

Du  capuchon  de  sa  caboche  ;  many  examples  in    the    literature 

Voyla  un  sot  de  la  Basoche,  referred  to  on  p.  382. 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         385 

Such  a  close-fitting  hood  was  of  course  common  wear  in  the 
fourteenth  century.  It  is  said  to  be  of  Gaulish  origin,  and 
to  be  retained  in  the  religious  cowl.  The  differentiae  of  the 
hood  of  a  'fool'  from  another  must  be  sought  in  the  grotesque 
appendages  of  ears,  crest  and  bells  l.  Already  an  eared  hood, 
exactly  like  that  of  the  '  fools,'  distinguishes  a  mask,  perhaps 
Gaulish,  of  the  Roman  period  2.  It  may  therefore  have  been 
adopted  in  the  Kalendae  at  an  early  date.  But  it  is  not, 
I  think,  unfair  to  assume  that  it  was  originally  a  sophistication 
of  a  more  primitive  headdress,  namely  the  actual  head  of 
a  sacrificial  animal  worn  by  the  worshipper  at  the  New  Year 
festival.  That  the  ears  are  asses'  ears  explains  itself  in  view 
of  the  prominence  of  that  animal  at  the  Feast  of  Fools.  It' 
must  be  added  that  the  central  crest  is  developed  in  some 
of  the  examples  figured  by  Douce  into  the  head  and  neck, 
in  others  into  the  comb  only,  of  a  cock  3.  With  the  hood,  in 
most  of  the  examples  quoted  above,  goes  the  marotte.  This 
is  a  kind  of  doll  carried  by  the  '  fool,'  and  presents  a  replica  of 
his  own  head  and  shoulders  with  their  hood  upon  the  end 
of  a  short  staff.  In  some  of  Douce's  figures  the  marotte  is 
replaced  or  supplemented  by  some  other  form  of  bauble,  such 
as  a  bladder  on  a  stick,  stuffed  into  various  shapes,  or  hollow 
and  containing  peas  4.  Naturally  the  colours  of  the  '  fools '  were 
gay  and  strikingly  contrasted.  Those  of  the  Paris  Enfants- 
sans-Sottci  were  yellow  and  green5.  But  it  may  be  doubted 
whether  these  colours  were  invariable,  or  whether  there  is 
much  in  the  symbolical  significance  attributed  to  them  by 

1  Rigollot,  lxxix.  en    forme     de     braiette,    frappant 

2  F.  de  Ficoroni,  Le  Maschere  hommes  et  femmes.'  I  suppose  the 
sceniche  e  le  Figure  comiche  d'  bauble,  like  the  hood,  was  originally 
antichi  Romani,  1 86,  pi.  72.  part  of  the  sacrificial  exuviae  and 

3  Dieterich,  237,  traces  the  cox-  the  marotte  a  sophistication  of  it. 
comb  to  Italian  comedy  of  the  Atel-  5  Julleville,  Z.f  j  Com.  147,  quoting 
lane  type;  cf.  ch.  xxiii,  on  '  Punch.'  Reponse  d'Angoulcvcut  a  Varchi- 

4  Douce,    pi.    3;     cf.    Leber,   in  poete  des  fiois  piliez  (1603): 
Rigollot,  lxi.  164,  quoting  the  pro-  '  Qu'apres,  dedans  le  char  de  la 
verb   '  pisa   in    utre   perstrepentia '  troupe  idiotte 

and  a  statement  of  Savaron,  Traite  Ayant  pour  sceptre  en  main  une 

contre  les  Masques  (1611),  that  at  peinte  marotte, 

Clermont  in  Auvergne  men  disguised  Tu  sois  parmi  Paris  pourmene 

'  en  Fols '  ran  through  the  streets  at  doucement, 

Christmas  'tenant  des  masses  a  la  Vestu  de  jaune  et  vert  en  ton 

main,  farcies  de  paille  ou  de  bourre,  accoustrement.' 

CHAMBERS.     I  C    C 


386  FOLK  DRAMA 

certain  writers1.  The  Infantcrie  Dijonnaise  in  fact  added 
red  to  their  yellow  and  green2.  The  colours  of  the  CleVes 
Order  of  Fools  were  red  and  yellow3. 

It  will  not  have  escaped  notice  that  the  costume  just 
described,  the  parti-coloured  garments,  the  hood  with  its  ears, 
bells  and  coxcomb,  and  the  marotte,  is  precisely  that  assigned 
by  the  custom  of  the  stage  to  the  fools  who  appear  as  dramatis 
personae  in  several  of  Shakespeare's  plays4.  Yet  these  fools 
have  nothing  to  do  with  societcs  joyeuses  or  the  Feast  of 
Fools  ;  they  represent  the  '  set,'  '  allowed,'  or  '  all-licensed ' 
fool  5,  the  domestic  jester  of  royal  courts  and  noble  houses. 
The  great  have  always  found  pleasure  in  that  near  neighbour- 
hood of  folly  which  meaner  men  vainly  attempt  to  shun. 
Rome  shared  the  stultus  with  her  eastern  subjects  and  her 
barbarian  invaders  alike ;  and  the  '  natural/  genuine  or  assumed, 
was,  like  his  fellow  the  dwarf,  an  institution  in  every  mediaeval 
and  Renascence  palace  6.  The  question  arises  how  far  the 
habit  of  the  socie'tes  joyenses  was  also  that  of  the  domestic  fool. 
In  France  there  is  some  evidence  that  from  the  end  of  the 
fourteenth  century  it  was  occasionally  at  least  taken  as  such. 
The  tomb  in  Saint  Maurice's  at  Senlis  of  Thevenin  de  St. 
Leger,  fool  to  Charles  V,  who  died  in  1374,  represents  him  in 
a  crested  hood  with  a  marotte  7.     Rabelais  describes  the  fool 

1  Leber,  in  Rigollot,  Ixviii.  For  fools  at  the  Scottish  court  of 

2  Julleville,  Les  Com.  195,  203.  James    IV    cf.   L.  H.  T.    i.    cxcix, 

3  Du  Tilliot,  84.  &c;  iii.  xcii,  &c.  ;  and  on  Thomas, 
*  See  e.  g.  the   plate  (p.  9)  and  the    fool     of    Durham    Priory    in 

description  (p.  xii)  of  Touchstone  in  the  fourteenth   century,    Appendix 

Miss  E.  Fogerty's 'costume edition'  E  (1). 

oi  As  You  Like  It.  7  Rigollot,     74;     Moreau,     180, 

5  Twelfth  Night,  i.   5.  95,  101  ;  quoting  a  (clearly  misdated)  letter 
Lear,  i.  4.  220.  of  Charles  V  to  the  municipality  of 

6  To  the  English  data  given  by  Troyes,  which  requires  the  provision 
the  historians  of  court  fools  may  of  a  new  '  fol  de  cour '  by  that  city 
be  added  Wardrobe  Account  28  as  a  royal  droit.  The  king's  eulogy 
Edw.  I,  1299-1300  (Soc.  Antiq.),  of  his  fool  is  rather  touching:  'savoir 
166  '  Martinetto  de  Vasconia  fatuo  faisons  a  leurs  dessus  dictes  sei- 
ludenti  coram  dicto  domino  Ed-  gneuries  que  Thevenin  nostre  fol  de 
wardo,'  and  Lib.  de  Comp.  Garde-  cour  vient  de  trespasser  de  celluy 
robae,  temp.  Edw.  II  {MS.  Cotton,  monde  dedans  1'aultre.  Le  Seigneur^ 
Nero,  C.  viii.  ff.  83,  85),  quoted  by  Dieu  veuille  avoir  en  gre"  lame  de 
Strutt,  194  'twenty  shillings  paid  luy  qui  oncques  ne  faillit  en  sa 
to  Robert  le  Foil  to  buy  a  boclarium  charge  et  fonction  empres  nostre 
ad  ludendum  before  the  king.'  royale  Seigneurie  et  mesmement  ne 
Robert  le  Foil  had  also  a  garcio.  voult  si  trespasser  sans  faire  quel- 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         387 

Seigni  Joan,  apparently  intended  for  a  court  fool,  as  having 
a  marotte  and  ears  to  his  hood.  On  the  other  hand,  he  makes 
Panurge  present  Triboulet,  the  fool  of  Louis  XII,  with  a  sword 
of  gilt  wood  and  a  bladder  \  A  little  later  Jean  Passerat 
speaks  of  the  hood,  green  and  yellow,  with  bells,  of  another 
royal  fool 2.  In  the  seventeenth  century  the  green  and  yellow 
and  an  eared  hood  formed  part  of  the  fool's  dress  which  the 
duke  of  Nevers  imposed  upon  a  peccant  treasurer 3.  But  in 
France  the  influence  of  the  socitttts  joycuses  was  directly 
present.  I  do  not  find  that  the  data  quoted  by  Douce  quite 
bear  out  his  transference  of  the  regular  French  habit  de  fou  to 
England.  Hoods  were  certainly  required  as  part  of  the 
costume  for  '  fools,'  '  disards,'  or  '  vices  '  in  the  court  revels  of' 
i55i_2j  together  with  '  longe  '  coats  of  various  gay  colours4  ; 
but  these  were  for  masks,  and  on  ordinary  occasions  the 
fools  of  the  king  and  the  nobles  seem  to  have  worn  the  usual 
dress  of  a  courtier  or  servant 5.  Like  Triboulet,  they  often 
bore,  as  part  of  this,  a  gilded  wooden  sword  6.  A  coxcomb, 
however,  seems  to  have  been  a  recognized  fool  ensign7,  and 
once,  in  a  tale,  the  complete  habit  is  described 8.  Other  fool 
costumes  include  a  long  petticoat 9,  the  more  primitive  calf-skin 10, 

que  joyeusete  et  gentille  farce  de  Lodge,    Wits  Miscrie  (1599),   de- 
son  metier.*'  scribes  a  fool  as  '  in  person  comely, 

1  Moreau,  177,  197.  in  apparell  courtly.'     The  Durham 

2  Quoted  by  Julleville,  Les  Com.  accounts  (Appendix  E  (1))  contain 
148  :  several  entries  of  cloth  and  shoes 

'  L'un  [le  poete]  a  la  teste  verte  ;  purchased  for  the  fool  Thomas,  but 

et  l'autre  va  couvert  there  is  no  mention  of  a  hood. 

D'un    joli    chapperon,   fait    de  6  Douce,  510. 

jaune  et  de  vert ;  7  Ibid.    510,    511.       Hence    the 

L'un    s'amuse    aux    grelots,   et  common    derived    sense    of  '  cox- 

l'autre  a  des  sornettes.'  comb  '  for  a  foolish,  vain  fellow. 

3  Requestes  presentees  au  Roy  .  .  .  8  Douce,  509,  quoting 'the  second 
par  le  S.  de  Vertau  (1605),  quoted  by  tale  of  the  priests  of  Peblis,'  which, 
Leber,  in  Rigollot,  lxvi  ;  Julleville,  for  all  I  know,  may  be  a  transla- 
Les  Com.  147  '  un  habit  .  .  .  qui  tion,  'a  man  who  counterfeits  a 
estoit  faict  par  bandes  de  serge,  fool  is  described  "with  club  and 
moitie"  de  couleur  verte  et  l'autre  bel  and  partie  cote  with  ei lis  "  ;  but 
de  jaune  ;  et  la  ou  il  y  avoit  des  it  afterwards  appears  that  he  had 
bandes  jaunes,  il  y  avoit  des  passe-  both  a  club  and  a  bauble. ' 

mens  verts,  et  sur  les  vertes  des  9  Douce,  510. 

passemens  jaunes  .  .  .  et  un  bonnet  10  Douce,  51 2,quoting6r.?A;  c7>vzy- 

aussi  moitie  de  jaune  et  vert,  avec  orum,  'the  scribe  claims  the  manor 

des  oreilles,  &c.'  of  Noverinte,  by  providing  sheep- 

4'Kempe,Zc^/^yyTA95',35,47,85.  skins  and  calves-skins  to   wrappe 

6  Douce,     512;       Doran,     293.  his  highness  wards  and  idiotts  in'; 

C  C  2 


388  FOLK  DRAMA 

and  a  fox  tail  hanging  from  the  back  l.  The  two  latter  seem 
to  bring  us  back  to  the  sacrificial  exuviae,  and  form  a  link 
between  the  court  fool  and  the  grotesque  '  fool,'  or  '  Captain 
Cauf  Tail '  of  the  morris  dances  and  other  village  revels. 

Whatever  may  have  been  the  case  with  the  domestic 
fool  of  history,  it  is  not  improbable  that  the  tradition  of  the 
stage  rightly  interprets  the  intention  of  Shakespeare.  The 
actual  texts  are  not  very  decisive.  The  point  that  is  most 
clear  is  that  the  fool  wears  a  '  motley '  or  '  patched  '  coat 2. 
The  fool  in  Lear  has  a  '  coxcomb  3 ' ;  Monsieur  Lavache  in 
Alts  Well  a  '  bauble,'  not  of  course  necessarily  a  marotte  4  ; 
Touchstone,  in  As  Yon  Like  Lt,  is  a  courtier  and  has  a  sword  5. 
The  sword  may  perhaps  be  inherited  from  the  'vice'  of  the 
later  moralities  6  ;  and,  in  other  respects,  it  is  possible  that 
Shakespeare  took  his  conception  of  the  fool  less  from  contem- 
porary custom,  for  indeed  we  hear  of  no  fool  at  Elizabeth's 
court,  than  from  the  abundant  fool-literature,  continental  and 
English,  above  described.  The  earliest  of  his  fools,  Feste  in 
Ttvelfth  Night,  quotes  Rabelais,  in  whose  work,  as  we  have 
just  seen,  the  fool  Triboulet  figures7.  It  is  noticeable  that 
the  appearance  of  fools  as  important  dramatis  personae  in  the 
plays  apparently  coincides  with  the  substitution  for  William 
Kempe  as  '  comic  lead  '  in  the  Lord  Chamberlain's  company 
of  Robert  Armin  8,  whose  own  Nest  of  Ninnies  abounds  in 
reminiscences  of  the  fool-literature9.     But  whatever  outward 

cf.   King  John,   iii.    i.    129    'And  and  Juliet,  ii.  4.  97,  which  suggest 

hang  a  calf  s-skin  on  those  recreant  less  a  '  marotte  '  than  a  bauble  of 

limbs.'  the  bladder  type  ;  cf.  p.  197. 

1  Douce,  511.  5  As  You  Like  It,  ii.  4.  47. 

2  Twelfth   Night,  i.    5.  63  ;    As  6  Cf.  ch.  xxv. 

You  Like  It,  ii.  7.   13,   43  ;  King  7   Twelfth  Night,  ii.  3.  22. 

Lear,  i.  4.  160;  Midsummer  Nigh t's  8  Fools  appear  in  As  You  Like 

Dream,  iv.  1.  215.     But  the   'long  //  (ti599),  All's   Well  that  Ends 

motley  coat  guarded  with  yellow'  Well      (ti6oi),      Twelfth     Night 

of  Hen.    VIII,  prol.   16,  does   not  (ti6oi),    King  Lear   (I-1605)  ;    cf. 

quite  correspond  to  anything  in  the  the  allusion  to  Yorick,  the   king's 

'  habit  de  fou.'  jester  in  Hamlet,  v.  1.  198  (I-1603). 

6  King    Lear,    i.    4.    106.      Cf.  Kempe  seems  to  have  left  the  Shake- 

Taming  of  the   Shrew,  ii.  1.   226  spearian  company  in  1598  or  1599. 

'  What  is  your  crest  ?  a  coxcomb  ? '  9   According     to     Fleay,     Biog. 

4  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  iv.  Chron.  i.  25,  Armin's  Nest  of  Nin- 

5.  32.     There  are  double  entendre's  nies,  of  1608  (ed.  Shakes.  Soc),  is 

here    and    in   the   allusion   to   the  a  revision  of  his  Fool  upon  Fool  of 

'bauble'  of  a  'natural'  in  Romeo  1605. 


GUILD  FOOLS  AND  COURT  FOOLS         389 

appearance  Shakespeare  intended  his  fools  to  bear,  there  can 
be  no  doubt  that  in  their  dramatic  use  as  vehicles  of  general 
social  satire  they  very  closely  recall  the  manner  of  the  sotties. 
Touchstone  is  the  type  :  '  He  uses  his  folly  like  a  stalking- 
horse,  and  under  the  presentation  of  that  he  shoots  his  wit  V 

1  As  You  Like  It,  v.  4.  ill.  Cf.  (Winchester  Sh.  Soc.) ;  J.  Thiim- 
Lionel  Johnson,  The  Fools  of  Shake-  mel,  Ueber  Sh.'s  Narren  {Sh.-Jahr- 
speare,  in  Nodes  Shakespearianae      buch,  ix.  87). 


CHAPTER  XVII 
MASKS  AND  MISRULE 

[Bibliographical  Note. — On  the  history  of  the  English  Masque  A.  Soer- 
gel,  Die  engtischen  Maskenspiele  (1882) ;  H.  A.  Evans,  English  Masques 
(1897) ;  J.  A.  Symonds,  Shakespeare 's  Predecessors,  ch.  ix;  A.  W.  Ward, 
English  Dramatic  Literature,  passim  ;  W.  W.  Greg,  A  List  of  Masques, 
Pageants,  &*c.  (1902),  may  be  consulted.  Much  of  the  material  used  by 
these  writers  is  in  Collier,  H.  E.  D.  P.  vol.  i,  and  P.  Cunningham, 
Extracts  from  the  Accounts  of  the  Revels  at  Court  (Shakespeare  Soc. 
1842).  For  the  early  Tudor  period  E.  Hall's  History  of  the  Union  of 
Lancaster  and  York  (1548)  and  the  Revels  Accounts  in  J.  S.  Brewer  and 
J.  Gairdner,  Letters  and  Papers  of  the  Reign  of  Henry  VIII,  vols,  ii,  iii, 
are  detailed  and  valuable.  R.  Brotanek's  very  full  Die  englischen 
Maskenspiele  (1902)  only  reached  me  when  this  chapter  was  in  type.] 

ALREADY  in  Saxon  England  Christmas  was  becoming 
a  season  of  secular  merry-making  as  well  as  of  religious 
devotion  *.  Under  the  post-Conquest  kings  this  tendency  was 
stimulated  by  the  fixed  habit  of  the  court.  William  the  Bastard, 
like  Charlemagne  before  him,  chose  the  solemn  day  for  his 
coronation ;  and  from  his  reign  Christmas  takes  rank,  with 
Easter,  Whitsuntide,  and,  at  a  much  later  date,  St.  George's 
day,  as  one  of  the  great  courtly  festivals  of  the  year.  The 
Anglo-Saxon  Chronicle  is  at  the  pains  to  record  the  place  of 
its  celebration,  twelvemonth  after  twelvemonth  2.  Among  the 
many  forgotten  Christmassings  of  mediaeval  kings,  history 
lays  a  finger  on  a  few  of  special  note :  that  at  which 
Richard  II,  with  characteristic  extravagance  and  the  con- 
sumption of  '  200  tunns  of  wine  and  2,000  oxen  with  their 
appurtenances,'  entertained  the  papal  legate  in  1398  ;  and  that, 
more  truly  royal,  at  which  Henry  V,  besieging  Rouen  in  1418, 

1  Tille,  Y.  and  C.  162;    Sandys,  of  Worcester,  Chronicle,  ed.  Thorpe, 

20.     At    Christmas,   1065,  Edward  i.  224). 

the    Confessor   '  curiam   tenuit '  at  2  Tille,  Y,  and  C.  160 ;  Ramsay, 

London, and  dedicated  Westminster  F.  of  E.  ii.  43. 
Abbey  on  Innocents'  day  (Florence 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  391 

'  refreshed  all  the  poore  people  with  vittels  to  their  great  com- 
fort and  his  high  praise  V  The  Tudors  were  not  behindhand 
with  aViy  opportunity  for  pageantry  and  display,  nor  does  the 
vogue  of  Christmas  throughout  the  length  and  breadth  of 
'  merrie  England '  need  demonstration  2.  The  Puritans  girded 
at  it,  as  they  did  at  May  games,  and  the  rest  of  the  delightful 
circumstance  of  life,  until  in  1644  an  ordinance  of  the  Long 
Parliament  required  the  festival  to  give  place  to  a  monthly 
fast  with  the  day  fixed  for  which  it  happened  to  coincide  3. 

The  entertainment  of  a  mediaeval  Christmas  was  diverse. 
There  was  the  banquet.  The  Boy  Bishop  came  to  court. 
Carols  were  sung.  New  Year  gifts  were  exchanged.  Hasti- 
ludia — jousts  or  tournaments — were  popular  and  splendid. 
Minstrels  and  jugglers  made  music  and  mirth.  A  succession 
of  gaieties  filled  the  Twelve  nights  from  the  Nativity  to  the 
Epiphany,  or  even  the  wider  space  from  St.  Thomas's  day  to 
Candlemas.  It  is,  however,  in  the  custom  of  masquing  that 
I  find  the  most  direct  legacy  to  Christmas  of  the  Kalends 
celebrations  in  their  bourgeois  forms.  Larvae  or  masks  are 
prominent  in  the  records  and  prohibitions  of  the  Feast  of  Fools 
from  the  decretal  of  Innocent  III  in  1207  to  the  letter  of  the 
Paris  theologians  in  1445  4.  I  take  them  as  being,  like  the 
characteristic  hood  of  the  '  fool,'  sophistications  of  the  capita 
pecudum,  the  sacrificial  exuviae  worn  by  the  rout  of  worshippers 
at  the  Kalendae.  Precisely  such  larvae,  under  another  name, 
confront  us  in  the  detailed  records  of  two  fourteenth-century 
Christmasses.  Amongst  the  documents  of  the  Royal  Ward- 
robe for  the  reign  of  Edward  III  are  lists  of  stuffs  issued  for 

1  Sandys,  23  ;  Ashton,  9.  Savaron,  Traite"  contre  les  masques 

s  Sandys,      53;       Ashton,      14;  (161 1)  ;  J.  G.  Drechssler,  de  larvis 

Drake,  94.  natalitiis  (1683)  ;   C.  H.  de  Berger, 

3  Ashton,  26  ;  Stubbes,  i.  173.  Cf.  Commentatio  de  personis  vulgo 
Vaughan's  Poems  (Muses  Library,  larvis  seu  mascheratis  (1723) ;  Pfan- 
i.  107) :  nenschmidt,    617;     Fr.    Back,    de 

i  Alas,  my  God !    Thy  birth  now  Graecorum  caeremoniis   in  quibus 

here  homines  deorum  vice  fungebantur 

Must  not  be  number'd   in  the  (1883);    W.    H.    Dall,   On   masks, 

year.'  labrets  and  certain  aboriginal  cus- 

4  Cf.  ch.  xiii.  There  is  much  toms  {Third  Annual  Report  of 
learning  on  the  use  of  masks  in  American  Bureau  of  Ethnology, 
seasonal  festivals  in  C.  Noirot,  1884,  p.  73);  Frazer,  Pausantas, 
Traitd   de    forigine   des    masques  iv.  239. 

(1609,  reprinted  in  Leber,  ix.  5) ; 


392 


FOLK  DRAMA 


the  ludi  domini  regis  in  1347-8  and  1348-9  x.  For  the 
Christmas  of  1347,  held  at  Guildford,  were  required  a  number 
of  '  viseres '  in  the  likeness  of  men,  women,  and  angels, 
curiously  designed  '  crestes,'  and  other  costumes  representing 
dragons, peacocks,  and  swans2.  The  Christmas  of  1348  held 
at  Ottford  and  the  following  Epiphany  at  Merton  yield  similar 
entries  3.  What  were  these  '  viseres  '  used  for  ?  The  term 
ludi  must  not  be  pressed.  It  appears  to  be  distinct  from 
hastiludia,  which  comes  frequently  in  the  same  documents, 
although  in  the  hastiludia  also  '  viseres '  were  used  4.     But  it 


1  Archaeologia,  xxxi,  37,  43,  44, 
120,  122. 

2  '  Et  ad  faciendum  ludos  domini 
Regis  ad  festum  Natalis  domini 
celebratum  apud  Guldefordum  anno 
Regis   xxj°,  in  quo  expendebantur 

XX 

iiij.  iiij.  tunicae  de  bokeram  diver- 
sorum  colorum,  xlij  viseres  diver- 
sorum  similitudinum  {specified  as 
xiiij  similitudines  facierum  mulie- 
rum,  xiiij  similitudines  facierum 
hominum  cum  barbis,  xiiij  similitu- 
dines capitum  angelorum  de  ar- 
gento)  xxviij  crestes  {specified  as 
xiiij  crestes  cum  tibiis  reversatis  et 
calciatis,  xiiij  crestes  cum  montibus 
et  cuniculis),  xiiij  clocae  depictae, 
xiiij  capita  draconum,  xiiij  tunicae 
albae,  xiiij  capita  pavonum  cumalis, 
xiiij  tunicae  depictae  cum  oculis 
pavonum,  xiiij  capita  cygnorum  cum 
suis  alis,  xiiij  tunicae  de  tela  linea 
depictae,  xiiij  tunicae  depictae  cum 
stellis  de  auro  et  argento  vapulatis.' 
The  performers  seem  to  have  made 
six  groups  of  fourteen  each,  repre- 
senting respectively  men,  women, 
angels,  dragons,  peacocks,  and 
swans.  A  notion  of  their  appearance 
is  given  by  the  cuts  from  miniatures 
(ti343)  in  Strutt,  160. 

3  '  Et  ad  faciendum  ludos  Regis 
ad  festum  Natalis  domini  anno 
Regis  xxijdo  celebratum  apud  Otte- 
fordum  ubi  expendebantur  viseres 
videlicet  xij  capita  hominum  et 
desuper  tot  capita  leonum,  xij  capita 
hominum  et  tot  capita  elephantum, 
xij  capita  hominum  cum  alis  ves- 
pertilionum,  xij  capita  de  wodewose 


[cf.  p.  185],  xvij  capita  virginum, xiiij 
supertunicaede  worsted  rubro  gutta- 
taecum  auro  et  lineatae  etreversatae 
et  totidem  tunicae  de  worsted  viridi 
.  .  .  Et  ad  faciendum  ludos  Regis  in 
festo  Epiphaniae  domini  celebrato 
apud  Mertonum  ubi  expendebantur 
xiij  visers  cum  capitibus  draconum  et 
xiij  visers  cum  capitibus  hominum 
habentibus  diademata,x  cr  tepies  de 
bokeram  nigro  et  tela  linea  Anglica.' 
4  Archaeologia,  xxxi.  29,  30,  118. 
The  element  of  semi-dramatic  spec- 
tacle was  already  getting  into  the 
fourteenth-century  tournament.  In 
1 33 1  Edward  III  and  his  court  rode 
to  the  lists  in  Cheap,  'omnes  splen- 
dido  apparatu  vestiti  et  ad  simili- 
tudinem  Tartarorum  larvati '  (An- 
nates Paulitii  in  Chron.  Edw.  I  and 
II,  R.  S.  i.  354).  In  1375  'rood 
dame  Alice  Ferrers,  as  lady  of 
the  sune,  fro  the  tour  of  London 
thorugh  Chepe  ;  and  alwey  a  lady 
ledyngealordysbrydell.  Andthanne 
begun  the  grete  justes  in  Smythe- 
feld '  (London  Chronicle,  70).  These 
ridings  closely  resemble  the  '  mum- 
mings '  proper.  But  they  were  a 
prelude  to  hastiludia,  which  from 
the  fourteenth  to  the  sixteenth  cen- 
tury constantly  grew  less  actual  and 
more  mimetic.  In  1343  'fuerunt 
pulchra  hastiludia  in  Smethfield, 
ubi  papa  et  duodecim  cardinales 
per  tres  dies  contra  quoscumque 
tirocinium  habuerunt'  (Murimuth, 
Contitiuatio  Chronicarum,  R.  S. 
146).  And  so  on,  through  the  jousts 
of  Pallas  and  Diana  at  the  corona- 
tion  of    Henry   VIII    (Hall,    511) 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE 


393 


does  not  necessarily  imply  anything  dramatic,  and  the  analo- 
gies suggest  that  it  is  a  wide  generic  term,  roughly  equivalent 
to  '  disports,'  or  to  the  '  revels  '  of  the  Tudor  vocabulary 1.  It 
recurs  in  1388  when  the  Wardrobe  provided  linen  coifs  for 
twenty-one  counterfeit  men  of  the  law  in  the  ludus  regis 2.  The 
sets  of  costumes  supplied  for  all  these  ludi  would  most 
naturally  be  used  by  groups  of  performers  in  something  of  the 
nature  of  a  dance ;  and  they  point  to  some  primitive  form  of 
masque,  such  as  Froissart  describes  in  contemporary  France  3, 
the  precursor  of  the  long  line  of  development  which,  traceable 
from  the  end  of  the  following  century,  culminates  in  the  glories 
of  Ben  Jonson.  The  vernacular  name  for  such  a  ludus  in  the 
fourteenth  century  was  'mumming'  or  '  disguising4.'  Orders 
of  the  city  of  London  in  1334,  1393,  and  1405  forbid  a  practice 
of  going  about  the  streets  at  Christmas  ove  visere  ne  faux 
visage,  and  entering  the  houses  of  citizens  to  play  at  dice 

of  her  husband's  death  there  should 
be  at  Christmas '  non  dysgysyngs,  ner 
harpyng,  ner  lutyng,  ner  syngyn,  ner 
non  lowde  dysports,  but  pleyng  at 
the  tabyllys,  and  schesse,  and  cards. 
Sweche  dysports  sche  gave  her 
folkys  leve  to  play,  and  non  odyr.' 
I  find  the  first  use  of  '  revels '  in 
the  Household  Books  of  Henry  VII 
for  1493  (Collier,  i.  50).  In  1496 
the  same  source  gives  the  Latin 
'revelliones'  (Collier,  i.  46). 
Sir  Thomas  Cawarden  (1545)  was 
patented  '  magister  iocorum,  revel- 
lorum  et  mascorum'  (Rymer,xv.  62). 
Another  synonym  is  'triumph,'  used 
in  151 1  (Arnold,  Chronicle,  xlv). 
The  latter  means  properly  a  royal 
entry  or  reception  ;  cf.  ch.  xxiii. 

2  Warton,  ii.  220,  from  Compotus 
Magn.  Garderobae,  14  Ric.  II, f.  I98b 
'  pro  xxi  coifs  de  tela  linea  pro  homi- 
nibus  de  lege  contrafactis  pro  ludo 
regis  tempore  natalis  domini  anno 
xii.' 

8  Froissart  (ed.  Buchon,  iii.  176), 
Bk.  iv,  ch.  32,  describes  the  dance 
°f  1393,  in  which  Charles  VI 
dressed  in  flax  as  a  wild  man  was 
nearly  burnt  to  death. 

4  The  English  William  of  Palerne, 
1620  (T1350,  ed.  Skeat,  E.  E.  T.  S.), 
has  '  daunces  disgisi.' 


to  the  regular  Elizabethan  'Barriers,' 
such  as  the  siege  of  the  '  Fortress 
of  Perfect  Beauty '  by  the  '  Four 
Foster  Children  of  Desire,'  in  which 
Sidney  took  part  in  1581. 

1  This  seems  to  be  clearly  the 
sense  of  the  ludi  Domini  Prions  in 
the  accounts  of  Durham  Priory  (cf. 
Appendix  E).  The  Scottish  Ex- 
chequer Rolls  between  1446  and 
1478  contain  such  entries  as  'iocis 
et  ludis,' '  ludis  et  interludes,' '  iocu- 
lancium  et  ludencium,'  'ludos  et 
disportus  suos,'  where  all  the  terms 
used,  except '  interludiis '  (cf.ch.xxiv), 
appear  to  be  more  or  less  equivalent 
(Accounts  of  the  Treasurer  of  Scot- 
land, i.  ccxxxix).  The  Liber  Niger 
of  Edward  IV  declares  that  in  the 
Dotnus  of  Henry  I  were  allowed 
'ludi  honesti,'  such  as  military  sports 
'cum  ceterorum  iocorum  diversitate' 
(Household  Ordinances,  18).  '  I  oca  ' 
is  here  exactly  the  French  'jeux.' 
Polydore  Vergil,  Hist.  Anglica  (ed. 
Thysius),  772,  says  of  the  weddings 
of  the  children  of  Henry  VII  'utrius- 
que  puellae  nuptiae  omnium  gene- 
rum  ludis  factae.'  For  '  disports ' 
cf.  Hall,  774, '  enterludes . . .  maskes 
and  dispones,'  and  Paston  Letters, 
iii.  3 1 4,  where  LadyMorley  is  said  to 
have  ordered  in  1476  that  on  account 


394 


FOLK  DRAMA 


therein1.  In  1417  'mummyng'  is  specifically  included  in  a 
similar  prohibition 2 ;  and  in  a  proclamation  of  the  following 
year,  '  mommyng '  is  classed  with  '  playes  '  and  'enterludes  '  as 
a  variety  of  '  disgisyng  V  But  the  disport  which  they  denied 
to  less  dignified  folk  the  rulers  of  the  city  retained  for  them- 
selves as  the  traditional  way  of  paying  a  visit  of  compliment 
to  a  great  personage.  A  fragmentary  chronicle  amongst 
Stowe's  manuscripts  describes  such  a  visit  paid  to  Richard  II 
at  the  Candlemas  preceding  his  accession  in  1377.  The 
'  mummers '  were  disguised  with  '  vizards '  to  represent  an 
emperor  and  a  pope  with  their  corteges.  They  rode  to 
Kennington,  entered  the  hall  on  foot,  invited  the  prince  and 
the  lords  to  dice  and  discreetly  lost,  drank  and  danced  with 
the  company,  and  so  departed  4.     This  is  the  first  of  several 


1  H.  T.  Riley,  Liber  Albus  (R.  S. 
xii),  i.  644,  645,  647,  673,  676 ;  Me- 
morials of  London,  193,  534,  561. 
For  similar  orders  elsewhere  cf. 
L.  T.  Smith,  Ricarfs  Calendar,  85 
(Bristol),  and  Harl.  MS.  2015,  f.  64 
(Chester). 

2  Riley,  Memorials,  658. 

3  Ibid.  669.  It  was  proclaimed 
'  that  no  manere  persone,  of  what 
astate,  degre,  or  condicioun  that 
euere  he  be,  duryng  this  holy  tyme 
of  Cristemes  be  so  hardy  in  eny 
wyse  to  walk  by  nyght  in  any 
manere  mommyng,  pleyes,  enter- 
ludes, or  eny  other  disgisynges 
with  eny  feynyd  berdis,  peyntid 
visers,diffourmyd  orcolourid  visages 
in  eny  wyse  .  .  .  outake  that  hit  be 
leful  to  eche  persone  for  to  be  honestly 
mery  as  he  can,  with  in  his  owne 
hous  dwellyng.' 

4  Stowe,  Survey  (ed.  Thorns),  37, 
from  a  fragment  of  an  English 
chronicle,  in  a  sixteenth-century 
hand,  in  Harl.  MS.  247,  f.  172' 
(cf.  Archaeologia,  xxii.  208).  I  print 
the  original  text,  which  Stowe  para- 
phrases, introducing,  e.g.,  the  term 
'maskers':  'At  ye  same  tyme  ye 
Comons  of  London  made  great 
sporte  and  solemnity  to  y9  yong 
prince :  for  upon  y6  monday  next 
before  ye  purification  of  our  lady 
at  night  and  in  ye  night  were  130 


men  disguizedly  aparailed  and  well 
mounted  on  horsebacke  to  goe  on 
mumming  to  ye  said  prince,  riding 
from  Newgate  through  Cheape 
whear  many  people  saw  them  with 
great  noyse  of  minstralsye,trumpets, 
cornets  and  shawmes  and  great 
plenty  of  waxe  torches  lighted  and  in 
the  beginning  they  rid  48  after  ye 
manei  of  esquiers  two  and  two  to- 
gether clothed  in  cotes  and  clokes 
of  red  say  or  sendall  and  their  faces 
covered  with  vizards  well  and  hand- 
somely made  :  after  these  esquiers 
came  48  like  knightes  well  arayed 
after  ye  same  maner  :  after  ye 
knightes  came  one  excellent  arrayed 
and  well  mounted  as  he  had  bene 
an  emperor :  after  him  some  100 
yards  came  one  nobly  arayed  as  a 
pope  and  after  him  came  24  arayed 
like  cardinals  and  after  ye  cardinals 
came  8  or  10  arayed  and  with  black 
vizardes  like  deuils  appearing  no- 
thing amiable  seeming  like  legates, 
riding  through  London  and  ouer 
London  bridge  towards  Kenyton 
wher  ye  yong  prince  made  his 
aboad  with  his  mother  and  the 
D.  of  Lancaster  and  ye  Earles  of 
Cambridge,  Hertford  Warrick  and 
Suffolk  and  many  other  lordes  which 
were  with  him  to  hould  the  solemnity, 
and  when  they  were  come  before  ye 
mansion  they  alighted  on  foot  and 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE 


395 


such  mummings  upon  record.  Some  chroniclers  relate  that  it 
was  at  a  mumming  that  the  partisans  of  Richard  II  attempted 
to  seize  Henry  IV  on  Twelfth  night  in  1400  1.  In  the  follow- 
ing year,  when  the  Emperor  Manuel  of  Constantinople  spent 
Christmas  with  Henry  at  Eltham,  the  '  men  of  London  maden 
a  gret  mommyng  to  hym  of  xij  aldermen  and  there  sons,  for 
whiche  they  hadde  gret  thanke2.'  In  1414  Sir  John  Oldcastle 
and  his  Lollards  were  in  their  turn  accused  of  using  a  mumming 
as  a  cloak  of  sedition3.     Thus  the  London  distrust  of  false 


entered  into  ye  haule  and  sone 
after  ye  prince  and  his  mother  and 
ye  other  lordes  came  out  of  ye  cham- 
ber into  ye  haule,  and  ye  said  mum- 
mers saluted  them,  shewing  a  pair 
of  dice  upon  a  table  to  play  with  ye 
prince,  which  dice  were  subtilly 
made  that  when  ye  prince  shold 
cast  he  shold  winne  and  y°  said 
players  and  mummers  set  before  ye 
prince  three  jewels  each  after  other : 
and  first  a  balle  of  gould,  then  a 
cupp  of  gould,  then  a  gould  ring,  y6 
which  y6  said  prince  wonne  at  thre 
castes  as  before  it  was  appointed, 
and  after  that  they  set  before  the 
prince's  mother,  the  D.  of  Lancaster, 
and  ye  other  earles  euery  one  a  gould 
ringe  and  y°  mother  and  ye  lordes 
wonne  them.  And  then  ye  prince 
caused  to  bring  ye  wyne  and  they 
dronk  with  great  joye,  commanding 
ye  minstrels  to  play  and  y°  trompets 
began  to  sound  and  other  instru- 
ments to  pipe  &c.  And  ye  prince 
and  ye  lordes  dansed  on  y°  one 
syde,  and  ye  mummers  on  ye  other 
a  great  while  and  then  they  drank 
and  tooke  their  leaue  and  so  de- 
parted toward  London.'  Collier,  i. 
26,  speaks  of  earlier  mummings 
recorded  by  Stowe  in  1236  and 
1298  ;  but  Stowe  only  names 
'  pageants  '  (cf.  ch.  xxiii).  M.  Paris, 
Chro?iica  Maiora  (R.  S.  lvii),  v. 
269,  mentions  'vestium  transforma- 
tarum  varietatem '  at  the  wedding 
of  Alexander  III  of  Scotland  and 
Margaret  of  England  in  125 1,  but 
this  probably  means  'a  succession 
of  rapidly  changed  robes.' 

1  A  Chronicle  0/  London  (1 1442, 


ed.  N.  H.  Nicolas  or  E.  Tyrrell, 
1827), 85  'to  have  sclayn  the  kyng . . . 
be  a  mommynge ' ;  Incerti  Scrip/oris 
Chronicon  (before  1455,  ed.  J.  A. 
Giles),  7  'conduxerunt  lusores  Lon- 
doniam,  ad  inducendum  regi  prae- 
textum  gaudii  et  laetitiae  iuxta 
temporis  dispositionem,  ludum 
nuncupatum  Anglice  Mummynge'; 
Capgrave,  Chronicle  of  England 
(+1464,  R.S.),  275  'undir  thecoloure 
of  mummeris  in  Cristmasse  tyme' ; 
An  English  Chronicle  (11461-71, 
C.  S.),  20  '  to  make  a  mommyng  to 
the  king  .  .  .  and  in  that  mommyng 
they  purposid  to  sle  him' ;  Fabian, 
Chronicle,  567  '  a  dysguysynge  or  a 
mummynge.'  But  other  chroniclers 
say  that  the  outbreak  was  to  be 
at  a  tournament,  e.g.  Continuatio 
Eulogii  (R.  S.  ix),  iii.  385  ;  Annates 
Henrici  (R.  S.  xxviii),  323  '  Sub 
simulatione  natalitiorum  vel  hasti- 
ludiorum.'  I  suppose  'natalitia'  is 
'Christmas  games'  and  might  cover 
a  mumming.  Hall,  Chronicle  (ed. 
1809),  16,  makes  it  'justes.'  So 
does  Holinshed  (ed.  1586),  iii-  514, 
516,  but  he  knew  both  versions; 
'  them  that  write  how  the  king 
should  have  beene  made  awaie  at 
a  justs ;  and  other  that  testifie, 
how  it  should  have  been  at  a 
maske  or  mummerie ' ;  cf.  Wylie, 
Henry  the  Fourth,  i.  93  ;  Ramsay, 
L.  and  Y.  i.  20. 

2  Stowe,  Survey  (ed.  Thorns),  37, 
doubtless  from  A  Chronicle  of 
Londoti  (t  1442,  ut  supra),  87.  I  do 
not  find  the  mumming  named  in 
other  accounts  of  the  visit. 

3  Gregory's     Chronicle     (before 


396 


FOLK  DRAMA 


visages  had  its  justification,  and  it  is  noteworthy  that  so  late 
as  151 1  an  Act  of  Parliament  forbade  the  visits  of  mummers 
disguised  with  visors  to  great  houses  on  account  of  the 
disorders  so  caused.  Even  the  sale  of  visors  was  made  illegal1. 
So  far  there  is  nothing  to  point  to  the  use  of  any  dialogue 
or  speeches  at  mummings.  The  only  detailed  account  is  that 
of  i377>  and  the  passage  which  describes  how  the  mummers 
'  saluted  '  the  lords,  '  shewing  a  pair  of  dice  upon  a  table  to 
play  with  the  prince,'  reads  rather  as  if  the  whole  performance 
were  in  dumb  show.  This  is  confirmed  by  the  explanation  of 
the  term  '  mummynge '  given  in  a  contemporary  glossary  2. 
The  development  of  the  mumming  in  a  literary  direction  may 
very  likely  have  been  due  to  the  multifarious  activity  of  John 
Lydgate.  Amongst  his  miscellaneous  poems  are  preserved 
several  which  are  stated  by  their  collector  Shirley  to  have 
been  written  for  mummings  or  disguisings  either  before  the 
king  or  before  the  lord  mayor  of  London  3.  They  all  seem 
to  belong  to  the  reign  of  Henry  VI  and  probably  to  the  years 


1467,  in  Hist.  Collections  of  a 
Citizen  0/ London,  C.  S.),  108  '  the 
whyche  Lollers  hadde  caste  to  have 
made  a  mommynge  at  Eltham,  and 
undyr  coloure  of  the  mommynge  to 
have  destryte  the  Kynge  and  Hooly 
Chyrche.' 

1  Acte  against  disguysed persons 
and  Wearing  of  Visours  (3  Hen. 
VIII,  c.  9).  The  preamble  states 
that  '  lately  wythin  this  realme 
dyvers  persons  have  disgysed  and 
appareld  theym,  and  covert  theyr 
fayces  with  Vysours  and  other 
thynge  in  such  manner  that  they 
sholde  nott  be  knowen  and  divers 
of  theym  in  a  Companye  togeder 
namyng  them  selfe  Mummers  have 
commyn  to  the  dwellyng  place  of 
divers  men  of  honor  and  other 
substanciall  persones  ;  and  so  de- 
parted unknowen.'  Offenders  are 
to  be  treated  as  'Suspectes  or  Vaca- 
bundes.' 

2  The Promptorium  Parvulorum 
(ti440  C.  S.),  ii.  348,  translates 
'  Mummynge '  by  '  mussacio  vel 
mussatus '  ('  murmuring '  or  '  keep- 
ing silence,'  conn,  mutus),  and  gives 


a  cognate  word  '  Mummyn,  as  they 
that  nojt  speke  Mutio'  This  is 
of  course  the  ordinary  sense  of 
mum.  But  Skeat  (Etym.  Diet,  s.v.) 
derives  '  mummer '  from  the  Dutch 
through  Old  French,  and  explains 
it  by  the  Low  German  Mumme,  a 
1  mask.'  He  adds  '  The  word  is 
imitative,  from  the  sound  mum  or 
mom,  used  by  nurses  to  frighten  or 
amuse  children,  at  the  same  time 
pretending  to  cover  thei'r  faces.' 
Whether  the  fourteenth  -  century 
mumming  was  silent  or  not,  there 
is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  the 
primitive  folk-procession  out  of 
which  it  arose  was  unaccompanied 
by  dance  and  song  ;  and  silence  is 
rarely,  if  ever  (cf.  p.  211)  de  rigueur 
in  modern  'guisings.' 

3  They  are  in  Trin.  Coll.  Camb. 
MS.  R.  iii.  20  (Shirley's ;  cf.  E.  P. 
Hammond,  Lydgate 's  Mumming 
at  Hertford  in  Anglia,  xxii.  364), 
and  copied  by  or  for  Stowe  '  out  of 
)>e  boke  of  John  Sherley '  in  B.  M. 
Add.  MS.  29729,  f.  132  (cf.  E. 
Sieper,  Lydgate 's  Reson  and 
Sensuallyte,    E.   E.   T.   S.    i.  xvi). 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE 


397 


1427-30.  And  they  show  pretty  clearly  the  way  in  which 
verses  got  into  the  disguisings.  Two  of  them  are  '  lettres ' 
introducing  mummings  presented  by  the  guilds  of  the  mercers 
and  the  goldsmiths  to  lord  mayor  Eastfield  l.  They  were 
doubtless  read  aloud  in  the  hall.  A  balade  sent  to  Henry 
and  the  queen  mother  at  Eltham  is  of  the  same  type  2.  Two 
'  devyses '  for  mummings  at  London  and  Windsor  were 
probably  recited  by  a  '  presenter.'  The  Windsor  one  is  of  the 
nature  of  a  prologue,  describing  a  '  myracle '  which  the  king  is 
'  to  see 3.'  The  London  one  was  meant  to  accompany  the 
course  of  the  performance,  and  describes  the  various  personages 
as  they  enter  4.     Still  more  elaborate  is  a  set  of  verses  used  at 


The  Hertford  verses  have  been 
printed  by  Miss  Hammond  (loc.  at.) 
and  the  others  by  Brotanek,  306. 
I  do  not  find  any  notice  of  dis- 
guisings when  Henry  VI  spent  the 
Christmas  of  1433  at  Lydgate's  own 
monastery  of  Bury  St.  Edmunds 
(F.  A.  Gasquet.  A  Royal  Christmas 
in  The  Old  English  Bible,  226). 
Devon,  Issues  of  the  Exchequer, 
473,  notes  a  payment  for  the  king's 
1  plays  and  recreations'  at  Christmas, 

1449- 

1  '  A    lettre    made    in    wyse    of 

balade  by  daun  Johan,  brought  by 

a  poursuyant  in  wyse  of  Mommers 

desguysed    to   fore    be    Mayre    of 

London,  Eestfeld,  vpon  be  twelffebe 

night     of     Cristmasse,     ordeyned 

Ryallych   by    be   worthy  Merciers, 

Citeseyns  of  london '  and  '  A  lettre 

made  in  wyse  of  balade  by  lede- 

gate  daun  Johan,  of  a  mommynge, 

whiche  be  Goldesmythes  of  be  Cite 

of  London  mommed  in  Right  fresshe 

and  costele  welych  desguysing  to 

beyre  Mayre  Eestfeld,  vpon  Candel- 

masse  day  at  nyght,  affter  souper ; 

brought    and    presented   vn   to    be 

Mayre     by     an     heraude,     cleped 

fifortune.'     The  Mercer's  pursuivant 

is  sent  from  Jupiter;  the  Goldsmiths' 

mummers  are  David  and  the  twelve 

tribes.     The  Levites  were  to  sing. 

William  Eastfield  was  mayor  1429- 

30    and     1437-8.      Brotanek,    306, 

argues  that,  as   a  second   term    is 

not  alluded    to,  this  was  probably 

the   first.     Fairholt,  Lord  Mayors' 


Pageants,  ii.  240,  prints  a  similar 
letterof  Lydgate's  sent  tothe  Sheriffs 
at  a  May-day  dinner. 

2  'A  balade  made  by  daun  John 
Lidegate  at  Eltham  in  Cristmasse 
for  a  momyng  tofore  be  kyng  and 
be  Qwene.'  Bacchus,  Juno  and 
Ceres  send  gifts  '  by  marchandes 
bat  here  be.'  The  same  collections 
contain  a  balade,  'gyven  vnto  b* 
Kyng  Henry  and  to  his  moder  the 
quene  Kateryne  sittyng  at  be  mete 
vpon  the  yeares  day  in  the  castell  of 
Hertford.'  Some  historical  allusions 
make  1427  a  likely  date  (Brotanek, 

3°5)- 

3  '  pe  devyse  of  a  momyng  to  fore 

be  kyng  henry  be  sixte,  beinge  in 
his  Castell  of  wyndesore,  be  fest  of 
his  crystmasse  holdyng  ber,  made 
by  lidegate  daun  John,  be  munk  of 
Bury,  howe  bampull  and  be  floure 
delys  came  first  to  )>e  Kynges  of 
ffraunce  by  myrakle  at  Reynes.'  An 
allusion  to  Henry's  coming  corona- 
tion in  Paris  fixes  the  date  101429-30. 

4  '  pe  deuyse  of  a  desguysing  to 
fore  be  gret  estates  of  bis  lande,  bane 
being  at  London,  made  by  Lidegate 
daun  Johan,  be  Munk  of  Bury,  of 
dame  fortune,  dame  prudence,  dame 
Rightwysnesse  and  dame  ffortitudo. 
beholdebe,  for  it  is  moral,  plesaunt 
and  notable.'  A  fifth  dame  is 
'  Attemperaunce.'  The  time  is 
'  Cristmasse.'  An  elaborate  pageant 
in  which  Fortune  dwelt  is  described. 
A  song  is  directed  at  the  close. 
Henry  V  is  spoken  of  as  dead. 


398  FOLK  DRAMA 

Hertford.  The  first  part  of  these  is  certainly  spoken  by  a 
presenter  who  points  out  the  '  vpplandishe '  complainants  to 
whom  he  refers.  But  the  reply  is  in  the  first  person,  and 
apparently  put  in  the  mouths  of  the  '  wyues '  themselves, 
while  the  conclusion  is  a  judgement  delivered,  again  probably 
by  the  presenter,  in  the  name  of  the  king  \ 

Whether  Lydgate  was  the  author  of  an  innovation  or  not, 
the  introduction  of  speeches,  songs,  and  dialogues  was  common 
enough  in  the  fully-developed  mummings.  For  these  we 
must  look  to  the  sumptuous  courts  of  the  early  Tudors. 
Lydgate  died  about  1451,  and  the  Wars  of  the  Roses  did  not 
encourage  revelry.  The  Paston  Letters  tell  how  the  Lady 
Morley  forbade  'dysguysyngs'  in  her  house  at  Christmas  after 
her  husband's  death  in  1476  2.  There  were  ludi  in  Scotland 
under  James  III  3.  But  those  of  his  successor,  James  IV, 
although  numerous  and  varied  4,  probably  paled  before  the 
elaborate  '  plays  '  and  '  disguisings '  which  the  contemporary 
account-books  of  Henry  VII  reveal 5.  Of  only  one  '  disguising/ 
however,  of  this  period  is  a  full  account  preserved.  It  took 
place  in  Westminster  Hall  after  the  wedding  of  Prince  Arthur 
with  Katharine  of  Spain  on  November  18,  150 1,  and  was 
'  convayed  and  showed  in  pageants  proper  and  subtile.5  There 
was  a  castle,  bearing  singing  children  and  eight  disguised 
ladies,  amongst  whom  was  one  '  apparelled  like  unto  the 
Princesse  of  Spaine,'  a  Ship  in  which  came  Hope  and  Desire  as 


1  '  Nowe  foloweth  here  the  maner  s  L.H.  T.Accounts,  i.  ccxl '  Iohanni 
of  a  bille  by  weye  of  supplycation  put  Rate,  pictori,  pro  le  mumre  regis' 
to  the  kynge  holdinge  his  noble  fest  (1465-6)  ;  ad  le  mumre  grath  ' 
of  crystmasse  in  the  castell  of  hart-  (1466-7). 

ford  as  in  dysguysinge  of  \>e  rude  *  Ibid.   i.   Ixxix,   cxliv,   ccxxxix  ; 

vpplandishe   people   complayninge  ii.     Ixxi,    ex  ;     iii.    xlvi,     lv,     and 

on  their  wyues  with  the  boystrus  passim,  have   many  payments  for 

answere  of  ther  wyues  deuysed  by  dances    at    court,   of  which   some 

lidgate     at     \>e    requeste     of    the  were    morris    dances,    with    '  leg- 

countrowlore  Brys  slain  at  louiers.'  harnis,'    and    also    to    '  madinnis,' 

Louviers  was  taken  by  the  French  'gysaris,'  or  'dansaris'  who  'dansit' 

in    1430   and   besieged    next    year  or  '  playit '  to  the  king  in  various 

(Brotanek,    306).      The    text    has  parts  of  the  country, 

marginal  notes,  '  demonstrando  vj  5  Campbell,     Materials    for    a 

rusticos,'  &c.  Hist,  of  Henry  VII (R.S.),  passim; 

2  Cf.  p.  393.  There  is  a  disguising  Collier,  i.  38-64 ;  Bentley,  Excerpta 
of  1483  in  the  Howard  Accounts  Historica,  85-133  ;  Leland,  Col- 
(Appendix  E,  vii).  lectanea,  iii.  256. 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  399 

Ambassadors,  and  a  Mount  of  Love,  from  which  issued  eight 
knights,  and  assaulted  the  castle.  This  allegorical  compli- 
ment, which  was  set  forth  by  '  countenance,  speeches,  and 
demeanor,'  ended,  the  knights  and  ladies  danced  together  and 
presently  'avoided.'  Thereupon  the  royal  party  themselves 
fell  to  dancing1.  'Pageants'  are  mentioned  in  connexion 
with  other  disguisings  of  the  reign,  and  on  one  occasion  the 
disguising  was  '  for  a  moryce  2.'  Further  light  is  thrown  upon 
the  nature  of  a  disguising  by  the  regulations  contained  in 
a  contemporary  book  of  '  Orders  concerning  an  Earl's  House.' 
A  disguising  is  to  be  introduced  by  torch-bearers  and  accom- 
panied by  minstrels.  If  there  are  women  disguised,  they  are 
to  dance  first,  and  then  the  men.  Then  is  to  come  the 
morris,  '  if  any  be  ordeynid.'  Finally  men  and  women  are  to 
dance  together  and  depart  in  the  '  towre,  or  thing  devised  for 
theim.'  The  whole  performance  is  to  be  under  the  control  of 
a  '  maister  of  the  disguisinges  '  or  '  revills  3.' 

It  is  possible  to  distinguish  a  simpler  and  a  more  elaborate 
type  of  masked  entertainment,  side  by  side,  throughout  the 
splendid  festivities  of  the  court  of  Henry  VIII.  For  the 
more  or  less  impromptu  '  mumming,'  the  light-hearted  and 
riotous  king  had  a  great  liking.  In  the  first  year  of  his  reign 
we  find  him  invading  the  queen's  chamber  at  Westminster  '  for 
a  gladness  to  the  queen's  grace '  in  the  guise  of  Robin  Hood, 
with  his  men  '  in  green  coats  and  hose  of  Kentish  Kendal ' 
and  a  Maid  Marian  4.  The  queen  subsequently  got  left  out, 
but  there  were  many  similar  disports  throughout  the  reign. 
One  of  these,  in  which  the  king  and  a  party  disguised  as 
shepherds  broke  in  upon  a  banquet  of  Wolsey's,  has  been 
immortalized  by  Shakespeare  5.      Such  mummings  were  com- 

1  Collier,  i.  58,  from  Harl.  MS.  '  some  part  is  dated  16  Henry  VII, 
69.  A  word  which  Collier  prints  although  the  handwriting  appears 
'Maskers'  is  clearly  a  misprint  for  to  be  that  of  the  latter  end  of  the 
'  Masters,'  and  misleading.  reign  of  Henry  VIII.' 

2  Ibid.     i.    53.       The    'morris'  4  Hall,  513  ;  Brewer,  ii.  1490. 
provided     a     grotesque     element,  5  Hen.    VIII,  i.  4;    Hall,  719; 
analogous  to  the  '  antimasque  '  of  Stowe,  Chronicle,  845  ;   Cavendish, 
Jonson's  day.  Life  of  IVolsey,  112;  Boswell-Stone, 

3  Ibid.  i.  24,  from  Fairfax  MS S.  Shakespeare's  Holinshed,  44.1? 
Of  this  Booke  of  all  manner  of  R.  Brown,  Venetian  Papers,  iv. 
Orders  cojicerning  an  Earle's  house  3,  4. 


400  FOLK  DRAMA 

paratively  simple,  and  the  Wardrobe  was  as  a  rule  only  called 
upon  to  provide  costumes  and  masks,  although  on  one  occasion 
a  lady  in  a  '  tryke  '  or  '  spell '  wagon  was  drawn  in  *.  But  the 
more  formal  '  disguisings '  of  the  previous  reign  were  also 
continued  and  set  forth  with  great  splendour.  In  1527  a 
'  House  of  Revel '  called  the  '  Long  House'  was  built  for  their 
performance  and  decorated  by  Holbein 2,  and  there  was 
constant  expenditure  on  the  provision  of  pageants.  '  The 
Golldyn  Arber  in  the  Arche-yerd  of  Plesyer,'  '  the  Dangerus 
Fortrees,'  '  the  Ryche  Mount,'  the  Pavyllon  un  the  Plas 
Parlos,'  '  the  Gardyn  de  Esperans,'  '  the  Schatew  Vert '  3  are 
some  of  the  names  given  to  them,  and  these  well  suggest  the 
kind  of  allegorical  spectacular  entertainment,  diversified  with 
dance  and  song,  which  the  chroniclers  describe. 

The  '  mumming '  or  '  disguising,'  then,  as  it  took  shape  at 
the  beginning  of  the  sixteenth  century,  was  a  form  of  court 
revel,  in  which,  behind  the  accretions  of  literature  and  pageantry, 
can  be  clearly  discerned  a  nucleus  of  folk-custom  in  the  entry 
of  the  band  of  worshippers,  with  their  sacrificial  exuviae,  to 
bring  the  house  good  luck.  The  mummers  are  masked  and 
disguised  folk  who  come  into  the  hall  uninvited  and  call  upon 
the  company  gathered  there  to  dice  and  dance.  It  is  not 
necessary  to  lay  stress  upon  the  distinction  between  the  two 
terms,  which  are  used  with  some  indifference.  When  they 
first  make  their  appearance  together  in  the  London  proclama- 
tion of  1418  the  masked  visit  is  a  'mumming,'  and  is  included 
with  the  '  enterlude '  under  the  generic  term  of  '  disguising.' 
In  the  Henry  VII  documents  '  mumming '  does  not  occur, 
and  in  those  of  Henry  VIII  'mumming'  and  'disguising'  are 
practically  identical,  'disguising,'  if  anything,  being  used  of 
the  more  elaborate  shows,  while  both  are  properly  distinct 
from  '  interlude.'  But  I  do  not  think  that  '  disguising '  ever 
quite  lost  its  earlier  and  widest  sense4.     It  must  now  be  added 

1  Brewer,  iii.  1552.  a  mask.     Away  from  court  in  1543 

2  Ibid.  iv.  1390-3  ;  Hall,  722.  four  players  were  committed  to  the 

3  Ibid.  ii.  1495,  I497>  I499j  i$OIi  Counter  for  'unlawful  disguising' 
1509;  iii.  1558.  (P.  C.  Ads,  i.  109,  no,  122).     They 

*  Hall,  597,  speaks  of  a  disguising  surely  played  interludes.  It  may 
in  1 5 19,  which  apparently  included  be  further  noted  (i)  the  elaborate 
'a  goodly  commedy  of  Plautus'  and      disguisings    of    Henry    VII     and 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  401 

that  early  in  Henry  VIII's  reign  a  new  term  was  introduced 
which  ultimately  supplanted  both  the  others.  The  chronicler 
Hall  relates  how  in  1513  'On  the  daie  of  the  Epiphanie  at 
night,  the  kyng  with  a  xi  other  were  disguised,  after  the  maner 
of  Italie,  called  a  maske,  a  thyng  not  seen  afore  in  Englande, 
thei  were  appareled  in  garmentes  long  and  brode,  wrought  all 
with  gold,  with  visers  and  cappes  of  gold  &  after  the  banket 
doen,  these  Maskers  came  in,  with  sixe  gentlemen  disguised 
in  silke  bearyng  staffe  torches,  and  desired  the  ladies  to 
daunce,  some  were  content,  and  some  that  knewe  the  fashion 
of  it  refused,  because  it  was  not  a  thyng  commonly  seen.  And 
after  thei  daunced  and  commoned  together,  as  the  fashion  of 
the  Maske  is,  thei  tooke  their  leaue  and  departed,  and  so  did 
the  Quene,  and  all  the  ladies1.' 

The  good  Hall  is  not  particularly  lucid  in  his  descriptions, 
and  historians  of  the  mask  have  doubted  what,  beyond  the 
name,  was  the  exact  modification  introduced  '  after  the  maner 
of  Italie'  in  1512.  A  recent  writer  on  the  subject,  Dr.  H.-A. 
Evans,  thinks  that  it  lay  in  the  fact  that  the  maskers  danced 
with  the  spectators,  as  well  as  amongst  themselves2.  But  the 
mummers  of  1377  already  did  this,  although  of  course  the 
custom  may  have  grown  obsolete  before  1513.  I  am  rather 
inclined  to  regard  it  as  a  matter  of  costume.  The  original  Revels 
Account  for  this  year — and  Hall's  reports  of  court  revels  are  so 
full  that  he  must  surely  have  had  access  to  some  such  source — 
mentions  provision  for  '  12  nobyll  personages,  inparylled  with 

Henry  VIII,  with  much  action  and  a  moral  play  was  'set  forth  with 
speechifying  besides  the  dancing,  straunge  deuises  of  Maskes  and 
are  difficult  to  distinguish  when  Morrishes '  (Hall,  719).  The  inter- 
merely  described  from  interludes.  lude  of  The  Nature  of  the  Four 
What  Hall,  518,  calls  in  1511  an  Elements  (early  Hen.  VIII)  has 
interlude,  seems  from  the  Revels  after  the  dramatis  personae  the 
Accounts  (Brewer,  ii.  1495)  to  have  direction,  'Also  yf  ye  lyst  ye  may 
been  really  a  disguising.  Hall,  brynge  in  adysgysynge';  cf. Soergel, 
641,  speaks  of  a  'disguisyng  or  play'  21. 
in    1522,    and    Cavendish,    Life   of  l  Hall,  526. 

Wolsey,  i.  136,  of  a  'disguising  or  2   Evans,    xxi.     Other    not    very 

interlude' in  1527;  (ii)  a  disguising  plausible  suggestions  are  made  by 

or  dance  might  be  introduced,  as  Ward,  i.  150;  Soergel,    13.     There 

entr'acte  or  otherwise,  into  an  inter-  is   a   good    account    of  the  Italian 

lude.     In    1514  an  interlude  'con-  mascherata    from    about    1474    in 

teyned  a  moresk  of  vj  persons  and  Symonds,  Shakespeare's  Predeces- 

ij  ladys'  (Collier,  i.  68).     In  1526  sors,  321. 

CHAMBERS.    I  J)    d 


402 


FOLK  DRAMA 


blew  damaske  and  yelow  damaske  long  gowns  and  hoods  with 
hats  after  the  maner  of  maskelyng  in  Etaly  V  Does  not  this 
description  suggest  that  the  '  thing  not  sene  afore  in  England ' 
was  of  the  nature  of  a  domino?  In  any  case  from  1513 
onwards  'masks,'  'maskelers'  or  'maskelings'  recur  frequently 
in  the  notices  of  the  revels 2.  The  early  masks  resembled 
the  simpler  type  of  '  mumming '  rather  than  the  more 
elaborate  and  spectacular  '  disguising,'  but  by  the  end  of 
the  reign  both  of  the  older  terms  had  become  obsolete,  and 
all  Elizabethan  court  performances  in  which  the  visor  and 
the  dance  played  the  leading  parts  were  indifferently  known 
as  masks 3.  Outside  the  court,  indeed,  the  nomenclature  was 
more  conservative,  and  to  this  day  the  village  performers  who 
claim  the  right  to  enter  your  house  at  Christmas  call  them- 
selves 'mummers,'  'guisers'  or  'geese-dancers.'  Sometimes  they 
merely  dance,  sing  and  feast  with  you,  but  in  most  places,  as 


1  Brewer,  ii.  1497.  There  is  a 
further  entry  in  an  account  of  15 19 
(Brewer,  iii.  35)  of  a  revel,  called 
a  '  masklyne,'  after  the  manner  of 
Italy. 

2  'Maske'  first  appears  in  1514 
(Collier,  i.  79  '  iocorum  larvatorum, 
vocat.  Maskes,  Revelles,  and  Dis- 
guysings'j;  'masque'  is  not  Eng- 
lish until  the  seventeenth  century 
(Evans,  xiii).  Skeat  derives  through 
the  French  masque,  masquer,  mas- 
querer,  and  the  Spanish  mascara, 
mascarada  (Ital.  mascherata)  from 
the  Arabic  maskharat,  a  buffoon  or 
droll  (root  sa/c/iira,  'he  ridiculed '). 
The  original  sense  would  thus  be 
'entertainment'  and  that  of  'face- 
mask  '  {larva,  '  vizard,'  '  viser ')  only 
derivative.  But  late  Latin  has  already 
tuasca,  talamasca  in  this  sense  ;  e.g. 
Burchardus  of  Worms,  Coll.  Dccre- 
torum  (before  1024),  bk.  ii.  c.  161 
'  nee  larvas  daemonum  quas  vulgo 
Talamascas  dicunt,  ibi  ante  se  ferri 
consentiat';  cf.  Ducange,  s.v.  Tala- 
masca ;  Pfannenschmidt,  617,  with 
some  incorrect  etymology.  And 
the  French  masque  is  always  the 
face-mask  and  never  the  perform- 
ance ;  whiles masquier,masquillier, 


masc/iurer,are  twelfth- to  thirteenth- 
century  words  for  '  blacken,' '  dirty.' 
I  therefore  prefer  the  derivation  of 
Brotanek,  120,  from  a  Germanic 
root  represented  by  the  M.  E.  maskel, 
'  stain '  ;  and  this  has  the  further 
advantage  of  explaining  '  maskeler,' 
'  maskeling,'  which  appear,  variously 
spelt,  in  documents  of  ti  5 19-26. 
Both  terms  signify  the  performance, 
and  '  maskeler  '  the  performer  also 
(Brotanek,  122).  Face-masks  were 
de  rigueur  in  the  Mask  to  a  late 
date.  In  1618  John  Chamberlain 
writes  '  the  gentlemen  of  Gray's 
Inn  came  to  court  with  their  show, 
for  I  cannot  call  it  a  masque, 
seeing  they  were  not  disguised, 
nor  had  vizards'  (Nichols,  James  7, 
iii.  468). 

3  Ben  Jonson,  iii.  162,  Masque  of 
Augurs  (1623)  'Disguise  was  the 
old  English  word  for  a  masque,  sir, 
before  you  were  an  implement  be- 
longing to  the  Revels  ' ;  ii.  476,  A 
Tale  of  a  Tub  (1634),  v.  2  : 
'  Pan.     A  masque  !   what's  that  ? 

Scriben.  A  mumming  or  a  shew, 

With  vizards  and  fine  clothes. 

Clench.     A  disguise,  neighbour, 

Is  the  true  word.' 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  403 

a  former  chapter  has  shown,  they  have  adopted  from  another 
season  of  the  year  its  characteristic  rite,  which  in  course  of 
time  has  grown  from  folk-dance  into  folk-drama  l. 

I  now  pass  from  the  mask  to  another  point  of  contact 
between  the  Feast  of  Fools  and  the  Tudor  revels.  This  was 
the  dominus  festi.  A  special  officer,  told  off  to  superintend 
the  revels,  pastimes  and  disports  of  the  Christmas  season,  is 
found  both  in  the  English  and  the  Scottish  court  at  the  end 
of  the  fifteenth  century.  In  Scotland  he  bore  the  title  of 
Abbot  of  Unreason2  ;  in  England  he  was  occasionally  the 
Abbot,  but  more  usually  the  Lord  of  Misrule.  Away  from 
court,  other  local  designations  present  themselves :  but  Lord 
of  Misrule  or  Christmas  Lord  are  the  generic  titles  known 
to  contemporary  literature 3.  The  household  accounts  of 
Henry  VII  make  mention  of  a  Lord  or  Abbot  of  Misrule  for 
nearly  every  Christmas  in  the  reign 4.  Under  Henry  VIII 
a  Lord  was    annually   appointed,  with  one  exception,   until 


1  Cf.  ch.  x.  Less  dramatic  per- 
formances are  described  for  the 
'  guizards  '  of  the  Scottish  Lowlands 
by  R.  Chambers,  Popular  Rhymes 
of  Scotland,  169,  for  the  '  mummers  ' 
of  Ireland  -in  N.  and  Q.  3rd  series, 
viii.  495,  for  the  'mummers'  of 
Yorkshire  in  F.  L.  iv.  162.  The 
latter  sweep  the  hearth,  humming 
'  mumm-m-m.' 

"  L.  H.  T.  Accounts,  i.  ccxl,  270, 
327;  ii.  ex,  in,  320,  374,  430, 
431  ;  iii.  127.  In  1504  is  a  pay- 
ment '  to  the  barbour  helit  Paules 
hed  quhen  he  wes  hurt  with  the 
Abbot  of  Unresoun.'  Besides  the 
court  Abbot,  there  was  an  '  Abbot 
of  Unresone  of  Linlithgow'  in  1501, 
who  '  dansit  to  the  king,'  and  an 
'  Abbot  of  Unresoun  of  the  pynou- 
ris  of  Leith  '  in  1504.  Such  entries 
cease  after  the  Scottish  Act  of  Par- 
liament of  1555  (cf.  p.  181). 

3  Stowe,  Survey,  37  '  There  was  in 
the  feast  of  Christmas  in  the  King's 
house,  wheresoever  he  was  lodged, 
a  Lord  of  Misrule  or  Master  of 
Merry  Disports  ;  and  the  like  had 
ye  in  the  house  of  every  nobleman 
of  honour  or  good  worship,  were  he 

D 


spiritual  or  temporal.  Among  the 
which,  the  Mayor  of  London  and 
either  of  the  Sheriffs  had  their 
several  Lords  of  Misrule,  ever  con- 
tending, without  quarrel  or  offence, 
who  should  make  the  rarest  pas- 
times to  delight  the  beholders. 
These  Lords  beginning  their  rule 
on  Allhollons  eve,  continued  the 
same  til  the  morrow  after  the  feast 
of  the  Purification,  commonly  called 
Candlemas-day.  In  all  which  space 
there  were  fine  and  subtle  disguis- 
ings,  masks  and  mummeries  '  ; 
Holinshed  (ed.  1587),  iii.  1067 'What 
time  [at  Christmas],  of  old  ordinarie 
course,  there  is  alwaies  one  appoint- 
ed to  make  sport  in  the  court, 
called  commonlie  lord  of  misrule  : 
whose  office  is  not  unknowne  to 
such  as  haue  beene  brought  up  in 
noble  mens  houses,  &  among 
great  house  keepers  which  use 
liberall  feasting  in  that  season.' 
The  sense  of  '  misrule '  in  this 
phrase  is  'disorder';  cf.  the  'un- 
civil rule '  of  Twelfth  Nii^ht,  ii.  3. 
132. 

4  Collier,  i.  4S-55  ;  Bentley,  Ex- 
cerpt.   Historica,    90,   92 ;    Leland, 

d  2 


404  FOLK  DRAMA 

1520 J.  From  that  date,  the  records  are  not  available,  but  an 
isolated  notice  in  1534  gives  proof  of  the  continuance  of  the 
custom2.  In  1521  a  Lord  of  Misrule  held  sway  in  the 
separate  household  of  the  Princess  Mary 3,  and  there  is  extant 
a  letter  from  the  Princess's  council  to  Wolsey  asking  whether  it 
were  the  royal  pleasure  that  a  similar  appointment  should  be 
made  in  1525  4.  Little  information  can  be  gleaned  as  to  the 
functions  of  the  Lord  of  Misrule  during  the  first  two  Tudor 
reigns.  It  is  clear  that  he  was  quite  distinct  from  the  officer 
known  as  the  '  Master  of  the  Revels,'  in  whose  hands  lay  the 
preparation  and  oversight  of  disguisings  or  masks  and  similar 
entertainments.  The  Master  of  the  Revels  also  makes  his 
first  appearance  under  Henry  VII.  Originally  he  seems  to 
have  been  appointed  only  pro  hac  vice,  from  among  the  officials, 
such  as  the  comptroller  of  the  household,  already  in  attend- 
ance at  court5.  This  practice  lasted  well  into  the  reign  of 
Henry  VIII,  who  was  served  in  this  capacity  by  such  dis- 
tinguished courtiers,  amongst  others,  as  Sir  Henry  Guildford 
and  Sir  Anthony  Browne 6.  Under  them  the  preparation  of 
the  revels  and  the  custody  of  the  properties  were  in  the  hands 

Collectanea  (ed.    Hearne),  iv.  255.  83;    Collier,   i.   50;    Yorke,  Hard- 

The  '  Lords' named  are  one  Ringley  wicke  Papers,  19.      Payments  are 

in  1491,  1492,  and  1495,  and  William  made  for  '  revels '  or  'disguisings' 

Wynnesbury  in  1508.     In  this  year  to  Richard  Pudsey  'serjeant   of  the 

the  terms  '  Lordship  '  and  '  Abbot '  cellar,'  Walter  Alwyn,  Peche,  Jaques 

are  both  used.     The  'Lord'  got  a  Haulte,  'my    Lord  Suff,  my  Lord 

fee  each  year  of  £6  135-.  &,d.     Also  Essex,  my  Lord  Will™,  and  other,' 

the  queen  (1503)  gave  him  £1.  John  Atkinson,  Lewes  Adam,  'master 

1  Collier,  i.  74,  76;  Brewer,  i.  cxi.  Wentworth.'  In  1501  Jaques  Hault 
Wynnesbury  was  Lord  in  1509,  and  William  Pawne  are  appointed 
1 5 1 1  to  1 5 1 5,  and  1519,  Richard  to  devise  disguisings  and  morisques 
Pole  in  1516,  Edmund  Trevor  in  for  a  wedding.  The  term  'Master 
151S,  William  Tolly  in  1520.  The  of  the  Revels'  is  in  none  of  these 
fees  gradually  rise  to  ,£13  6s.  8d.  cases  used.  But  in  an  '  Order  for 
and  a  '  rewarde  '  of  £2.  Madden,  sitting  in  the  King's  great  Chamber,' 
Expenses  of  Princess  Maty,  xxvi,  dated  Dec.  31,  1494  (Ordinances 
enters  a  gift  in  1520  'domino  mali  and  Regulations, Soc.  Antiq.  113),  it 
gubernatoris  [?  gubernationis]  ho-  is  laid  down  that  '  if  the  master  of 
spicii  domini  Regis.'  revells  be  there,  he  may  sit  with  the 

2  Brewer,  vii.  589.  chaplains   or   with    the    squires   or 

3  Madden,  op.  <://.  xxviii.    He  was  gentlemen  ushers.' 

John  Thurgood.  6  Revels    Accounts    (Brewer,    ii. 

4  Eilis,  Original  Letters  (ist  1490 ;  iii.  1548),  s.  ann.  1510,1511, 
series,),  i.  270/  1512,     1513,     1515,     1517,     1522; 

8  Campbell,  Materials  for  Hist.  Brewer,  i.  718  ;  ii.  1441  ;  xiv.  2. 
of  Hen.   VII  (R.  S.),  i.  337  ;  ii.  60,      284  ;    Kempe,  69  ;    Collier,    i.   68. 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  405 

of  a  permanent  minor  official.  At  first  such  work  was  done  in 
the  royal  Wardrobe,  but  under  Henry  VIII  it  fell  to  a  distinct 
1  serjeant '  who  was  sometimes,  but  not  always,  also  '  serjeant ' 
to  the  king's  tents.  In  i545,however,  a  permanent  Master  of  the 
Revels  was  appointed  in  the  person  of  Sir  Thomas  Cawarden, 
one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  privy  chamber 1.  Cawarden 
formed  the  Revels  into  a  regular  office  with  a  clerk  comp- 
troller, yeoman,  and  clerk,  and  a  head  quarters,  at  first  in 
Warwick  Inn,  and  afterwards  in  the  precinct  of  the  dissolved 
Blackfriars,  of  which  he  obtained  a  grant  from  the  king.  This 
organization  of  the  Revels  endured  in  substance  until  after  the 
Restoration  2.  Not  unnaturally  there  were  some  jealousies 
and  conflicts  of  authority  between  the  permanent  Master  of  the 
Revels  and  the  annual  Lord  of  Misrule,  and  this  comes  out 
amusingly  enough  from  some  of  Cawarden's  correspondence 
for  1551-3,  preserved  in  the  muniment  room  at  Loseley.  For 
the  two  Christmases  during  this  period  the  Lordship  of  Mis- 
rule was  held  by  George  Ferrers,  one  of  the  authors  of  the 
Mirrour  for  Magistrates  3  ;  and  Cawarden  seems  to  have  put 
every  possible  difficulty  in  the  way  of  the  discharge  of  his 
duties.  Ferrers  appealed  to  the  lords  of  the  council,  and  it 
took  half  a  dozen  official  letters,  signed  by  the  great  master 
of  the  household,  Mr.  Secretary  Cecil,  and  a  number  of  other 
dignitaries,  to  induce  the  Master  of  the  Revels  to  provide  the 
hobby  horses  and  fool's  coat  and  what  not,  that  were  required4. 
Incidentally  this  correspondence  and  the  account  books  kept 

Guildford   is   several    times   called  Kempe,  69,  73,  93,  101  ;  Molyneux 

'master  of  the  revels';  so  is  Harry  Papers  (Hist.  MS.  Comm.,  seventh 

Wentworth  in  1510.    Ini522Guild-  Rep.),  603,  614;  Brewer,  ii.  2.  1517; 

ford   is  'the  hy  kountrolleler.'     It  xiii.    2.    100;    xiv.    2.     159,    284; 

was   the  '  countrowlore '   at   whose  xvi.  603  ;  Halliwell,  A  Collection  of 

request  Lydgate  prepared  one  of  his  Ancient  Documents  respecting  the 

disguisings  (p.  398).  Office  of  Master  of  the  Revels  ( 1 870) ; 

1  Rymer,  xv.  62  '  dedimus  et  P.  Cunningham,  Extracts  from  the 
concessimus  eidem  Thomae  offici-  Accounts  of  Revels  at  Court  (Sh. 
um    Magistri    Iocorum    Revelorum  Soc.  1842). 

&  Mascorum  omnium  &  singularium  3  Kempe,    19;    Collier,    i.     147; 

nostrorum  vulgariter  nuncupatorum  Holinshed   (ut  cit.  supra,  p.  403)  ; 

Revells    &    Masks.'       The    tenure  W.  F.  Trench,  A  Mirror  for  Ma- 

of  office  was  to  date  from  March  gislrates,  its  Origin  and  Influence, 

16,  1544,  and  the  annual  fee  was  66,  76. 

,£10.  *  Kempe,   23.      One   of  Ferrers' 

2  Collier,   i.  79,    131,    139,    153;  letters   to    Cawarden    is  endorsed 


406  FOLK  DRAMA 

by  Cawarden  give  some  notion  of  the  sort  of  amusement 
which  the  Lord  of  Misrule  was  expected  to  organize.  In  1551 
he  made  his  entry  into  court  '  out  of  the  mone.'  He  had  his 
fool  '  John  Smith  '  in  a  *  vice's  coote  '  and  a  '  dissard's  hoode,' 
a  part  apparently  played  by  the  famous  court  fool,  Will  Somers. 
He  had  a  '  brigandyne' ;  he  had  his  '  holds,  prisons,  and  places 
of  execuc'on,  his  cannypie,  throne,  seate,  pillory,  gibbet, 
hedding  block,  stocks,  little  ease,  and  other  necessary  incydents 
to  his  person '  ;  he  had  his  '  armury '  and  his  stables  with 
'  13  hobby  horses,  whereof  one  with  3  heads  for  his  person, 
bought  of  the  carver  for  his  justs  and  challenge  at  Green- 
wich.' The  masks  this  year  were  of  apes  and  bagpipes,  of 
cats,  of  Greek  worthies,  and  of  '  medyoxes '  ('double  visaged, 
th'  one  syde  lyke  a  man,  th'  other  lyke  death  ')l.  The  chief 
difficulty  with  Cawarden  arose  out  of  a  visit  to  be  paid  by  the 
Lord  to  London  on  January  4.  The  apparel  provided  for  his 
'  viij  counsellors '  on  that  occasion  was  so  '  insufficient '  that 
he  returned  it,  and  told  Cawarden  that  he  had  '  mistaken  ye 
persons  that  sholde  weere  them,  as  Sr  Rob1  Stafford  and  Thorn8 
Wyndesor,  wh  other  gentlemen  that  stande  also  upon  their 
reputacon,  and  wold  not  be  seen  in  London,  so  torche-berer 
lyke  disgysed,  for  as  moche  as  they  are  worthe  or  hope  to  be 
worthe  V  After  all  it  took  a  letter  from  the  council  to  get  the 
fresh  apparel  ready  in  time.  It  was  ready,  for  Machyn's  Diary 
records  the  advent  of  the  Lord  and  his  'consell '  to  Tower  Wharf, 
with  a '  mores  danse,'  and  the '  proclamasyon '  made  of  him  at  the 
Cross  in  Cheap,  and  his  visit  to  the  mayor  and  the  lord  trea- 
surer, *  and  so  to  Bysshopgate,  and  so  to  Towre  warff,  and  toke 
barge  to  Grenwyche 3.'  Before  the  following  Christmas  of  1552 
Ferrers  was  careful  to  send  note  of  his  schemes  to  Cawarden 
in  good  time  4.  This  year  he  would  come  in  in  'blewe'  out  of 
'  vastum  vacuum,  the  great  waste.'     The  '  serpente  with  sevin 

'  Ferryrs,  the  Lorde  Myserable,  by  W.  F.  Trench,  op.  cit.  21  ;  D.  N.B. 

the  Cunsell's  aucketorryte.'  Ferrers  s.  v.    William   Baldwin  ;     G[uliel- 

solemnly  heads  his  communications  mus]    B[aldwin]     Beware  the    Cat 

'  Qui  est  et  fuit,'  and  alludes  to  the  (1570,  reprinted  by  Halliwell,  1864). 

king  as  '  our  Founder.'  In   this  pamphlet   Baldwin   tells  a 

1  Kempe,  85.  story  heard  by  him  at  court  'the 

2  Ibid.  28.  last  Christmas,'  where  he  was  with 

3  Machyn,  13.  '  Maister   Ferrers,  then  maister  of 

4  Kempe,  32;    Collier,    i.    148;  the  King's  Majesties  pastimes.'  The 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  407 

heddes  called  hidra '  was  to  be  his  arms,  his  crest  a  '  wholme 
bush  '  and  his  '  worde  '  semper  ferians.  Mr.  Windham  was  to 
be  his  admiral,  Sir  George  Howard  his  master  of  the  horse, 
and  he  required  six  councillors,  '  a  divine,  a  philosopher,  an 
astronomer,  a  poet,  a  phisician,  a  potecarie,  a  mr  of  requests, 
a  sivilian,  a  disard,  John  Smyth,  two  gentleman  ushers,  besides 
jugglers,  tomblers,  fooles,  friers,  and  suche  other.'  Again 
there  was  a  challenge  with  hobby  horses,  and  again  the  Lord 
of  Misrule  visited  London  on  January  6,  and  was  met  by 
Sergeant  Vauce,  Lord  of  Misrule  to  '  master  Maynard  the 
Shreyff '  whom  he  knighted.  He  then  proceeded  to  dinner 
with  the  Lord  Mayor1.  As  he  rode  his  cofferer  cast  gold  and 
silver  abroad,  and  Cawarden's  accounts  show  that  '  coynes  ' 
were  made  for  him  by  a  '  wyer-drawer/  after  the  familiar 
fashion  of  the  Boy  Bishops  in  France 2.  These  accounts  also 
give  elaborate  details  of  his  dress  and  that  of  his  retinue, 
and  of  a  '  Triumph  of  Venus  and  Mars 3.  In  the  following 
year  Edward  was  dead,  and  neither  Mary  nor  Elizabeth 
seems  to  have  revived  the  appointment  of  a  Lord  of  Misrule 
at  court  4. 

But  the  reign  of  the  Lord  of  Misrule  extended  far  beyond 
the  verge  of  the  royal  palace.  He  was  especially  in  vogue  at 
those  homes  of  learning,  the  Universities  and  the  Inns  of 
Court,  where  Christmas,  though  a  season  of  feasting  and  ludi, 
had  not  yet  become  an  occasion  for  general  'going  down.' 
Anthony  a  Wood  records  him  in  several  Oxford  colleges, 
especially  in  Merton  and  St.  Johfi's,  and  ascribes  his  downfall, 
justly,  no  doubt,  in  part,  to  the  Puritans5.     At  Merton  he 

date  seems  fixed  to  1552  by  a  men-  Kempe,  37 '  Saynt  John's  Daye,  ano 
tionof '  Maister  Willott  and  Maister  1553,'  clearly  belongs  to  the  Christ- 
Stremer,  the  one  his  [Ferrers']  mas  of  1552.  The  additional  gar- 
Astronomer,  the  other  his  Divine  '  ments  asked  for  therein  are  in  the 
(cf.  Kempe,  34).  The  pamphlet  accounts  for  that  year  (Kempe,  52). 
was  probably  printed  in  1553  and  5  A.Wood,  Athenae  Oxonienses 
suppressed.  (ed.  Bliss),  iii.  480  'The  custom 
*  Machyn,  28 ;  Stowe,  Annals,  was  not  only  observed  in  that  [St. 
608.  Abraham  Fleming  in  Holin-  John's]  college,  but  in  several  other 
shed  (ed.  1587),  copying  Stowe,  houses,  particularly  in  Merton  Col- 
transfers  the  events  of  this  Christ-  lege,  where,  from  the  first  founda- 
mas  by  mistake  to  1 55 1-2.  tion,  the  fellows  annually  elected, 

2  Kempe,  53  ;  cf.  p.  369.  about  St.  Edmund's  day,  in  Novem- 

3  Ibid.  47.  ber,  a  Christmas   lord,  or   lord  of 

4  The  letter  from  Ferrers  dated  in  misrule,  styled  in  their  registers  Rex 


408 


FOLK  DRAMA 


bore  the  title  of  Rex  fabarum  or  Rex  regni  fabarum  \  He 
was  a  fellow  of  the  college,  was  elected  on  November  j  9,  and 
held  office  until  Candlemas,  when  the  winter  festivities  closed 
with  the  Ignis  Regentium  in  the  hall.  The  names  of  various 
Reges  fabarum  between  1487  and  1557  are  preserved  in  the 
college  registers,  and  the  last  holder  of  the  office  elected  in 
the  latter  year  was  Joseph  Heywood,  the  uncle  of  John  Donne, 
in  his  day  a  famous  recusant2.  At  St.  John's  College 
a '  Christmas  Lord,  or  Prince  of  the  Revells,'  was  chosen  up 
to  1577.  Thirty  years  later,  in  1607,  the  practice  was  for  one 
year  revived,  and  a  detailed  account  of  this  experiment  was 
committed  to  manuscript  by  one  Griffin  Higgs  3.  The  Prince, 
who  was  chosen  on  All  Saints'  day,  was  Thomas  Tucker.    He 


Fabarum  and  Rex  Regni  Fabarum  ; 
which  custom  continued  until  the 
reformation   of  religion,  and  then, 
that     producing     puritanism,    and 
puritanism  presbytery,  the   profes- 
sion of  it  looked  upon  such  laudable 
and  ingenious  customs  as  popish, 
diabolical  and  antichristian  ' ;  Hist, 
and  Antiq.  of  the   Univ.  of  Oxford, 
ii.  136,  's.  a.  1557'  mentions  an  ora- 
tion '  de  ligno  et  foeno '  made  by 
David    de   la    Hyde,    in   praise   of 
4  Mr.  Jasper    Heywood,  about  this 
time  King,  or  Christmas  Lord,  of 
the   said    Coll.   [Merton]    being    it 
seems  the  last  that  bore  that  com- 
mendable office.     That  custom  hath 
been   as  ancient  for  ought   that  I 
know  as  the  College  itself,  and  the 
election  of  them  after  this  manner. 
On  the  19th  of  November,  being  the 
vigil  of  S.  Edmund,  king  and  mar- 
tyr,  letters    under  seal   were   pre- 
tended to  have  been  brought  from 
some    place    beyond   sea,    for    the 
election  of  a  king  of  Christmas,  or 
Misrule,  sometimes  called  with  us 
of  the  aforesaid   college,   Rex  Fa- 
barum.    The  said  letters  being  put 
into   the   hands   of  the   Bachelaur 
Fellows,  they  brought  them  into  the 
Hall     that     night,    and     standing, 
sometimes  walking,  round  the  fire, 
there  reading  the  contents  of  them, 
would  choose  the  senior  Fellow  that 
had     not    yet    borne    that     office, 
whether  he  was  a  Doctor  of  Divin- 


ity, Law,  or  Physic,  and  being  so 
elected,  had  power  put  into  his 
hands  of  punishing  all  misdemean- 
ours done  in  the  time  of  Christmas, 
either  by  imposing  exercises  on  the 
juniors,  or  putting  into  the  stocks 
at  the  end  of  the  Hall  any  of  the 
servants,  with  other  punishments 
that  were  sometimes  very  ridiculous. 
He  had  always  a  chair  provided  for 
him,  and  would  sit  in  great  state 
when  any  speeches  were  spoken,  or 
justice  to.  be  executed,  and  so  this 
his  authority  would  continue  till 
Candlemas,  or  much  about  the  time 
that  the  Ignis  Regentium  was  cele- 
brated in  that  college ' ;  Life  and 
Times  (O.  H.S.),  i.  423  'Fresh 
nights,  carolling  in  public  halls, 
Christmas  sports,  vanished,  1661.' 

1  The  title  is  borrowed  from  the 
Twelfth -Night  King;  cf.  p.  260. 
Perhaps  '  Rex  de  Faba '  was  an 
early  name  for  the  Lord  of  Misrule 
at  the  English  court.  In  1334 
Edward  III  made  a  gift  to  the 
minstrels  '  in  nomine  Regis  Fabae ' 
(Strutt,  344). 

2  G.  C.  Brodrick,  Memorials  of 
Merton  College,  46  and  passim  ; 
B.  W.  Henderson,  Merton  College, 
267. 

3  The  Christmas  Prince  in  1607, 
printed  in  Miscellanea  Antigua 
Anglicana  (1816)  ;  M.  L.  Lee, 
Narcissus:  A  Twelfth  Night Merri- 
tnent,  xvii. 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  409 

was  installed  on  November  5,  and  immediately  made  a  levy 
upon  past  and  present  members  of  the  college  to  meet  the 
necessary  expenses.  Amongst  the  subscribers  was c  Mr.  Laude.' 
On  St.  Andrew's  day,  the  Prince  was  publicly  installed  with 
a  dramatic  '  deuise '  or  '  showe  '  called  Ara  Fortunae.  The  hall 
was  a  great  deal  too  full,  a  canopy  fell  down,  and  the  '  fool ' 
broke  his  staff.  On  St.  Thomas's  day,  proclamation  was  made  of 
the  style  and  title  of  the  Prince  and  of  the  officers  who  formed 
his  household  K  He  also  ratified  the  '  Decrees  and  Statutes  ' 
promulgated  in  1577  by  his  predecessor  and  added  some 
rather  pretty  satire  on  the  behaviour  of  spectators  at  college 
and  other  revels.  On  Christmas  day  the  Prince  was  attended 
to  prayers,  and  took  the  vice-president's  chair  in  hall,  where 
a  boar's  head  was  brought  in,  and  a  carol  sung.  After  supper 
was  an  interlude,  called  Saturnalia.  On  St.  John's  day  '  some 
of  the  Prince's  honest  neighbours  of  St.  Giles's  presented  him 
with  a  maske  or  morris  ';  and  the  '  twelve  daies '  were  brought 
in  with  appropriate  speeches.  On  December  29  was  a  Latin 
tragedy  of  Philomela,  and  the  Prince,  who  played  Tereus, 
accidentally  fell.  On  New  Year's  day  were  the  Prince's 
triumphs,  introduced  by  a  'shew'  called  Time's  Complaint;  and 
the  honest  chronicler  records  that  this  performance  '  in  the 
sight  of  the  whole  University '  was  '  a  messe  of  absurdityes,' 
and  that  '  two  or  three  cold  plaudites '  much  discouraged  the 
revellers.  However,  they  went  on  with  their  undertaking. 
On  January  10  were  two  shews,  one  called  S omnium  Funda- 
toris,  and  the  other  The  Seven  Days  of  the  Wceke.  The 
dearth  in  the  city  caused  by  a  six  weeks'  frost  made  the  Pre- 
sident inclined  to  stop  the  revels,  as  in  a  time  of '  generall  wo 
and  calamity  '  ;  but  happily  a  thaw  came,  and  on  January  15 
the  college  retrieved  its  reputation  by  a  most  successful  public 

1  The  Prince's  designation  was  Gouernour  of  Gloster-greene,  Sole 
'The  most  magnificent  and  re-  Comaunder  of  all  Titles,  Turnea- 
nowned  Thomas  by  the  fauour  of  ments  and  Triumphes,  Super- 
Fortune,  Prince  of  Alba  Fortunata,  intendent  in  all  Solemnities  what- 
Lord  Sl.  John's,  high  Regent  of  soeuer.'  His  seal,  a  crowned  and 
ye  Hall,  Duke  of  Sl.  Giles,  Mar-  spotted  dog,  with  the  motto  Pro 
quesse  of  Magdalens,  Landgraue  arts  et  focis,  bears  the  date  1469. 
of  ye  Groue,  County  Palatine  of  Amongst  his  officers  was  a  '  Mr 
ye  Cloisters,  Cheife  Bailiffe  of  y6  of  ye  Reuells.'  His  Cofferer  was 
Beaumonts,  high  Ruler  of  Rome,  Christopher  Wren. 
Maister  of  the  Manor  of  Waltham, 


410  FOLK  DRAMA 

performance  of  a  comedy  Philomathcs.  The  Seven  Days  of 
the  Weeke,  too,  though  acted  in  private,  had  been  so  good  that 
the  vice-chancellor  was  invited  to  see  a  repetition  of  it,  and 
thus  Sunday,  January  17,  was  'spent  in  great  mirth.'  On  the 
Thursday  following  there  was  a  little  contretemps.  The  canons 
of  Christ  Church  invited  the  Prince  to  a  comedy  called  Yule- 
tide,  and  in  this  '  many  things  were  either  ill  ment  by  them, 
or  ill  taken  by  vs.'  The  play  in  fact  was  full  of  satire  of 
'  Christmas  Lords,'  and  it  is  not  surprising  that  an  apology 
from  the  dean,  who  was  vice-chancellor  that  year,  was 
required  to  soothe  the  Prince's  offended  feelings.  Term  had 
now  begun,  but  the  revels  were  renewed  about  Candlemas. 
On  that  day  was  a  Vigilate  or  all-night  sitting,  with  cards, 
dice,  dancing,  and  a  mask.  At  supper  a  quarrel  arose.  A  man 
stabbed  his  fellow,  and  the  Prince's  stocks  were  requisitioned 
in  deadly  earnest.  After  supper  the  Prince  was  entertained 
in  the  president's  lodging  with  '  a  wassail  called  the  five  bells 
of  Magdalen  church.'  On  February  6,  '  beeing  egge  Satter- 
day,'  some  gentlemen  scholars  of  the  town  brought  a  mask  of 
Penelope's  Wooers  to  the  Prince,  which,  however,  fell  through  ; 
and  finally,  on  Shrove  Tuesday,  after  a  shew  called  Ira  sett 
Tumulus  Fortunae,  the  Prince  was  conducted  to  his  private 
chamber  in  a  mourning  procession,  and  his  reign  ended.  Even 
yet  the  store  of  entertainment  provided  was  not  exhausted. 
On  the  following  Saturday,  though  it  was  Lent,  an  English 
tragedy  of  Periander  was  given,  the  press  of  spectators  being 
so  great  that s  4  or  500  '  who  could  not  get  in  caused  a  tumult. 
And  still  there  remained  '  many  other  thinges  entended,'  but 
unperformed.  There  was  the  mask  of  Penelope's  Wooers,  with 
the  State  of  Telemachus  and  a  Controversy  of  Irus  and  his 
Ragged  Company.  There  were  an  Embassage  from  Lubber  land, 
a  Creation  of  White  Knights  of  the  Order  of  Aristotle's  Well, 
a  Triumph  of  all  the  Founders  of  Colleges  in  Oxford,  not  to 
speak  of  a  lottery  '  for  matters  of  mirth  and  witt '  and  a  court 
leet  and  baron  to  be  held  by  the  Prince.  So  much  energy 
and  invention  in  one  small  college  is  astonishing,  and  it  was 
hard  that  Mr.  Griffin  Higgs  should  have  to  complain  of  the 
treatment  meted  out  to  its  entertainers  by  the  University  at 
large.     '  Wee  found  ourselves,'  he  says,  '  (wee  will  say  justly) 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  411 

taxed  for  any  the  least  errour  (though  ingenious  spirits  would 
have  pardoned  many  things,  where  all  things  were  entended 
for  their  owne  pleasure)  but  most  vnjustly  censured,  and 
envied  for  that  which  was  done  (wee  daresay)  indifferently 
well.' 

Amongst  other  colleges  in  which  the  Lord  of  Misrule  was 
regularly  or  occasionally  chosen,  Anthony  a  Wood  names, 
with  somewhat  vague  references,  New  College  and  Magdalen1. 
To  these  may  certainly  be  added  Trinity,  where  the  Princeps 
Natalicins  is  mentioned  in  an  audit-book  of  1559  2-  But  ^e 
most  singular  of  all  the  Oxford  documents  bearing  on  the 
subject  cannot  be  identified  with  any  particular  college.  It 
consists  of  a  series  of  three  Latin  letters 3.  The  first  is 
addressed  by  Gloria  in  excelsis  to  all  mortals  sub  Natalicia 
ditioue  degcntibus.  They  are  bidden  keep  peace  during  the 
festal  season  and  wished  pleasant  headaches  in  the  mornings. 
The  vicegerent  of  Gloria  in  excelsis  upon  earth  is  an  annually 
constituted  praelatia,  that  so  a  longer  term  of  office  may  not 
beget  tyranny.  The  letter  goes  on  to  confirm  the  election  to 
the  kingly  dignity  of  Robertus  Grosteste 4,  and  enjoins  obe- 
dience to  him  sectmdum  Natalicias  leges.  It  is  datum  in  aere 
luminoso  supra  Bethlemeticam  regionem  ubi  nostra  magnificentia 
fuit  pastoribus  promtdgata.  The  second  letter  is  addressed  to 
R\obert\  Regi  Natalicio  and  his  proceres  by  Discretio  virtutum 
omnium  parens pariter  ac  regina.  It  is  a  long  discourse  on  the 
value  of  moderation,  and  concludes  with  a  declaration  that 
a  moderate  laetitia  shall  rule  until  Candlemas,  and  then  give 
way  to  a  moderate  clerimonia.  The  third  is  more  topical  and 
less  didactic  in  its  tone.     It  parodies  a  papal  letter  to  a  royal 

1  Wood,  Hist,  of  Oxford  (ut  he  takes  the  letters,  but  the  rest  of 
supra,  p.  408),  ii.  1 36,  has  the  follow-  his  collection  is  from  the  fourteenth- 
ing  note  'New  Coll.  in  Cat.  MSS.,  century  Brit.  Mus.  Royal  MS. 
p.  371  ..  .  Magd.  Coll.  v.  Heylin's  12  D,  xi. 

Diary,  an.  1617,  1619  et  1620.'  *  '  Quocirca  festi  praesentis  im- 

2  Warton,  iii.  304  '  pro  prandio  minenti  vigilia,  vos  ut  accepimus 
Principis  Natalicii  eodem  tempore  inlocopotatorio,horaextraordinaria 
xiii8.  ixd.'  prout   moris  est,   unanimiter   con- 

3  H.  H.  Henson,  Letters  relating  gregati,  dominum  Robertum  Gros- 
to  Oxford  in  the  fourteenth  century  teste  militem  in  armis  scolasticis 
in  the  Oxford  Hist.  Soc.'s  Col-  scitis  [Ed.  satis]  providum  et  ex- 
leclanea,  i.  39.  The  learned  editor  pertum,  electione  concordi  sds- 
does  not  give  the  MS.  from  which  tulistis  ad  apicem  regiae  dignitatis.' 


412  FOLK  DRAMA 

sovereign.  Transaetherius,  pater  patrum  ac  to  tins  ecdesiasticae 
monarchiae  pontifex  et  minister  complains,  R.  Regi  Natalicio, 
of  certain  abuses  of  his  rule.  His  stolidns  senescallus,  madidus 
marescallus  and  parliamenti  grandiloquus  sed  nugatorius  pro- 
locutor have  tit  plura  possent  inferre  stipendia  assaulted  and 
imprisoned  on  the  very  night  of  the  Nativity,  Iohannem  Cur- 
tibiensem  episcopum.  In  defence  of  these  proceedings  the  Rex 
has  pleaded  quasdam  antiquas  regni  tui,  non  dico  consuetudines, 
scdpotins  corruptelas.  Transaetherius  gives  the  peccant  officials 
three  hours  in  which  to  make  submission.  If  they  fail,  they 
shall  be  excommunicated,  and  Iohannes  de  Norwico,  the 
warden  of  Jericho,  will  have  orders  to  debar  them  from  that 
place  and  confine  them  to  their  rooms.  The  letter  is  datum 
in  vertice  Montis  Cancari,  pontificahis  nostri  anni  non  jluxibili 
sed  actemo.  I  think  it  is  clear  that  these  letters  are  not  a  mere 
political  skit,  but  refer  to  some  actual  Christmas  revels.  The 
waylaying  of  Iohannes  Curtibiensis  episcopus  to  make  him 
'  pay  his  footing '  is  exactly  the  sort  of  thing  that  happened 
at  the  Feast  of  Fools,  and  the  non  consuetudincs,  sed  potius 
corruptelas  is  the  very  language  of  the  decretal  of  1207  *.  But 
surely  they  are  not  twelfth-  or  early  thirteenth-century  revels, 
as  they  must  be  if  Robertus  Grosteste'  is  taken  literally  as 
the  famous  bishop  of  Lincoln  2.  There  was  no  parliamenti 
prolocutor,  for  instance,  in  his  day.  They  are  fourteenth-,  fifth- 
teenth-,  or  even  sixteenth-century  fooling,  in  connexion  with 
some  Rex  Natalicius  who  adopted,  to  season  his  jest,  the 
name  of  the  great  mediaeval  legislator  against  all  such  ludi. 

At  Cambridge  an  order  of  the  Visitors  of  Edward  VI  in 
1549  forbade  the  appointment  of  a  dominus  ludorum  in  any 
college  3.  But  the  prohibition  did  not  endure,  and  more  than 
one  unsuccessful  Puritan  endeavour  to  put  down  Lords  of 
Misrule  is  recorded  by  Fuller  4.     Little,  however,  is  known  of 

1  Cf.  p.  279.  were  of  course  no  colleges  tl200; 

2  Grosseteste  probably  became  if  rex,  he  was  rex  at  a  hall.  But 
a  student  at  Oxford  before  1196.  1200  is  an  early  date  even  in  the 
About  12 14  he  became  Chancellor,  history  of  the  Feast  of  Fools. 

and  it  seems  hardly  likely,  as  Mr.  3  Cooper,  Annals  of  Cambridge, 

Stevenson    thinks,  that   he   would  ii.  32  ;  Stat.  Acad.  Cantab.  161. 

have  been  rex  natalicius  as  late  as  4  Fuller,  Good  Thoughts  in  Worse 

ti233    (F.    S.    Stevenson,    Robert  Times  (1646),  193  'Some  sixty  years 

Grosseteste,    8,    25,    no).     There  since,  in  the  University  of  Cam- 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE 


413 


the  Cambridge  Lords  ;  their  bare  existence  at  St.  John's l  and 
Christ's  Colleges 2 ;  and  at  Trinity  the  fact  that  they  were 
called  imperatorcs,  a  name  on  the  invention  of  which  one  of 
the  original  fellows  of  the  college,  the  astronomer  John  Dee, 
plumes  himself3.  At  schools  such  as  Winchester  and  Eton, 
the  functions  of  Lord  of  Misrule  were  naturally  supplied  by  the 
Boy  Bishop.  At  Westminster  there  was  a  paedonomus,  and 
Bryan  Duppa  held  the  office  early  in  the  seventeenth 
century  4. 

The  revels  of  the  Inns  of  Court  come  into  notice  in  1422, 
when  the  Black  Book  of  Lincoln's  Inn  opens  with  the  announce- 
ment Ccux  sont  les  nouns  de  ceux  qe  fuerunt  assigncs  de  con- 


bridge  it  was  solemnly  debated 
betwixt  the  Heads  to  debarre  young 
schollers  of  that  liberty  allowed 
them  in  Christmas,  as  inconsistent 
with  the  Discipline  of  Students. 
But  some  grave  Governors  men- 
tioned the  good  use  thereof,  because 
thereby,  in  twelve  days,  they  more 
discover  the  dispositions  of  Scholars 
than  in  twelve  moneths  before ' ; 
Hist,  of  Cambridge  (ed.  M.  Prickett 
and  J.  Wright),  301  (s.  a.  1610-11), 
describing  a  University  Sermon  by 
\Vm.  Ames,  Fellow  of  Christ's,  who 
'had  (to  use  his  own  expression) 
the  place  of  a  watchman  for  an 
hour  in  the  tower  of  the  University; 
and  took  occasion  to  inveigh  against 
the  liberty  taken  at  that  time, 
especially  in  such  colleges  who  had 
lords  of  misrule,  a  pagan  relic  which 
(he  said )  as  Polidore  Vergil  showeth, 
remaineth  only  in  England.'  W. 
Ames  had,  in  consequence,  to  'for- 
sake his  college.'  Polydore  Vergil, 
de  Inventoribus  Rerum,  v.  2  (transl. 
Langley,  f.  102 T),  speaks  of  '  the 
Christemass  Lordes '  of  England. 

1  Cooper,  op.  cit.  ii.  112;  Baker, 
St.  John's,  ii.  573.  Lords  in  1545 
and  1556. 

2  Ibid.  ii.  in.  A  lord  in 
1566.  Peile,  Christ's  College,  54, 
quotes  payments  of  the  time  of 
Edward  VI  'for  sedge  when  the 
Christenmasse  lords  came  at  Candle- 
mas to  the  Colledge  with  shewes '  ; 
'  for  the  lordes  of  S.  Andrewes  and 


his  company  resorting  to  the  Col- 
ledge.' These  were  perhaps  from 
the  city  ;  cf.  p.  419. 

3  Dee,    Compendious    Rehearsal 
(Chronicle  of  John  of  Glastonbury , 
ed.  T.  Hearne,  502), '  in  that  College 
also  (by  my  advice  and  by  my  en- 
deavors, divers  ways  used  with  all 
the  other  colleges)  was  their  Christ- 
mas   Magistrate    first    named   and 
confirmed  an  Emperor.     The  first 
was  one  Mr.  Thomas  Dun,  a  very 
goodly  man  of  person,  stature  and 
complexion,  and  well  learned  also.' 
Warton,  iii.  302,  describes  a  draught 
of  the  college  statutes  in  Ratul.  MS. 
233,  in  which  cap.  xxiv  is  headed 
'  de  Praefecto  Ludorum  qui  Impe- 
rator  dicitur,'  and  provides  for  the 
superintendence  by  the  Imperator 
of  the  Spectacula  at  Christmas  and 
Candlemas.     But  the  references  to 
the  Imperator  have  been  struck  out 
with  a  pen,  and  the  title  altered  to 
'de    Comoediis  Ludisque  in  natali 
Christi    exhibendis.'      This   is   the 
title  of  cap.  xxiv  as  actually  issued 
in    1560   (Mullinger,    University  of 
Cambridge,  579).     The  earlier  sta- 
tutes of  1552  have  no  such  chapter. 
4  H.  King,   Funeral  Sermon   of 
Bishop  Duppa  (1662),  34  '  Here  he 
had  the  greatest  dignity  which  the 
School  could  afford  put  upon  him, 
to  be  the   Paedonomus   at  Christ- 
mas, Lord  of  his  fellow  scholars  : 
which  title  was  a  pledge  and  pre- 
sage that,  from  a  Lord  in  jeast,  he 


414  FOLK  DRAMA 

tinner ycile  nowel 1.  They  are  mentioned  in  the  Paston  Letters 
in  1451  2,  and  in  Sir  Fortescue's  De  laudibus  Legum  Angliae 
about  1463  3.  Space  compels  me  to  be  very  brief  in  sum- 
marizing the  further  records  for  each  Inn. 

Lincoln's  Inn  had  in  1 430  its  four  revels  on  All  Hallows'  day, 
St.  Erkenwold's  (April  30),  Candlemas  and  Midsummer  day, 
under  a  '  Master  of  the  Revels.'  In  1455  appears  a  '  marshal,' 
who  was  a  Bencher  charged  to  keep  order  and  prevent  waste 
from  the  last  week  of  Michaelmas  to  the  first  of  Hilary  term. 
Under  him  were  the  Master  of  the  Revels,  a  butler  and 
steward  for  Christmas,  a  constable-marshal,  server,  and  cup- 
bearer. In  the  sixteenth  century  the  '  grand  Christmassings  ' 
were  additional  to  the  four  revels,  and  those  of  Candlemas 
were  called  the  '  post  revels.'  Christmas  had  its  '  king.'  In 
1519  it  was  ordered  that  the  'king'  should  sit  on  Christmas 
day,  that  on  Innocents'  day  the  '  King  of  Cokneys  '  4  should 
'  sytt  and  haue  due  seruice,'  and  that  the  marshal  should 
himself  sit  as  king  on  New  Year's  day.  In  151 7  some  doors 
had  been  broken  by  reason  of  'Jake  Stray,'  apparently  a 
popular  anti-king  or  pretender,  and  the  order  concludes, 
'  Item,  that  Jack  Strawe  and  all  his  adherentes  be  from  hens- 
forth  uttrely  banyshed  and  no  more  to  be  used  in  Lincolles 
Inne.'  In  1520  the  Bench  determine  'that  the  order  of 
Christmas  shall  be  broken  up';  and  from  that  date  a  '  solemn 
Christmas '  was  only  occasionally  kept,  by  agreement  with  the 
Temples.  Both  Lincoln's  Inn  and  the  Middle  Temple  had 
a  'Prince,'  for  instance,  in  1599.  In  1616  the  choice  of  a 
'  Lieutenant '  at  Christmas  was  forbidden  by  the  Bench  as 
'  not  accordinge  to  the  auncyant  Orders  and  usages  of  the 
House.'  In  1624  the  Christmas  vacation  ceased  to  be  kept. 
There  were  still  '  revels '  under  '  Masters  of  the  Revels '  in 
Michaelmas  and  Hilary  terms,  and  there  are  notices  of  dis- 
order at  Christmas  in  1660  and  1662.     But  the  last  '  Prince' 

should,  in   his   riper  age,   become  stewards  this  year  at  the   Middle 

one  in  earnest';   cf.  J.  Sargeaunt,  and  Inner  Temples  are  mentioned. 

Annals  of  Westminster  School,  64.  s  Fortescuc,deI,audibtts,cap.x\ix. 

1  Records  of  Lincoln's  Inn  :  Black  4  N.  E.  D.  s.  v.  Cockney,  supposes 
Books,  i.  1.  the  word  to  be  here   used  in   the 

2  Paston   Letters,   i.   186.      The     sense  of  '  cockered  child,' '  mother's 
names    of   two  gentlemen   chosen     darling.' 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  415 

of  Lincoln's  Inn,  was  probably  the  Prince  de  la  Grange  of 
166 1,  who  had  the  honour  of  entertaining  Charles  II1. 

The  Inner  Temple  held  '  grand  Christmasses '  as  well  as 
1  revels '  on  All  Saints',  Candlemas,  and  Ascension  days.  The 
details  of  the  Christmas  ceremonies  have  been  put  together  from 
old  account  books  by  Dugdale.  They  began  on  St.  Thomas's 
day  and  ended  on  Twelfth  night.  On  Christmas  day  came  in 
the  boar's  head.  On  St.  Stephen's  day  a  cat  and  a  fox  were 
hunted  with  nine  or  ten  couple  of  hounds  round  the  hall  -.  In 
the  first  few  days  of  January  a  banquet  with  a  play  and  mask 
was  given  to  the  other  Inns  of  Court  and  Chancery.  The 
Christmas  officers  included  a  steward,  marshal,  butler,  con- 
stable-marshal, master  of  the  game,  lieutenant  of  the  tower, 
and  one  or  more  masters  of  the  revels.  The  constable- 
marshal  was  the  Lord  of  Misrule.  He  held  a  fantastic  court 
on  St.  Stephen's  day 3,  and  came  into  hall  '  on  his  mule '  to 
devise  sport  on  the  banquetting  night.  In  1523  the  Bench 
agreed  not  to  keep  Christmas,  but  to  allow  minstrels  to  those 
who  chose  to  stay.  Soon  after  1554  the  Masters  of  Revels 
cease  to  be  elected  4.     Nevertheless  there  was  a  notable  revel 

1  Records  of  Lincoln's  Inn  :  Black  name,  in  this  manner :  "  Sir  Francis 
Books,  i.  xxx,  181,  190  ;  ii.  xxvii,  Flatterer,  of  Fowleshurst,  in  the 
191;  iii.  xxxii,  440;  W.  Dugdale,  county  of  Buckingham.  Sir  Randle 
246;  W.  Herbert,  314;  J.  A.  Rackabite,  of  Rascall  Hall,  in  the 
Manning,  Memoirs  of  Rudyerd,  16 ;  County  of  Rakehell.  Sir  Morgan 
J.  Evelyn,  Diary  (s.  ann.  1661-2).  Mumchance,  of  Much  Monkery,  in 
As  an  appendix  to  vol.  iii  of  the  the  County  of  Mad  Mopery.  Sir 
Black  Book  is  reprinted  'EyKvicXo-  Bartholmevv  Baldbreech,  of  But- 
X°pela,  or  Universal  Motion,  Being  tocke-bury,  in  the  County  of  Breke- 
part  of  that  Magnificent  Entertain-  neck  "...  About  Seaven  of  the 
ment  by  the  noble  Prince  de  la  Clocke  in  the  Morning  the  Lord  of 
Grange,  Lord  Lieutenant  of  Lin-  Misrule  is  abroad,  and  if  he  lack  any 
coin's  Inn.  Presented  to  the  High  Officer  or  attendant,  lie  repaircth 
and  Mighty  Charles  II'  (1662).  to  their  Chambers,  and  compelleth 
Evelyn  mentions  the  '  solemne  them  to  attend  in  person  upon  him 
foolerie  '  of  the  Prince  de  la  Grange,  after    Service    in    the    Church,    to 

2  Cf.  p.  257.  breakfast,   with    Brawn,    Mustard, 

3  '  Supper  ended,  the  Constable-  and  Malmsey.  After  Breakfast 
Marshall  presenteth  himself  with  ended,  his  Lordship's  power  is  in 
Drums  afore  him,  mounted  upon  a  suspence,  until  his  personal  presence 
Scaffold,  born  by  four  men  ;  and  at  night  ;  and  then  his  power  is 
goeth  three  times  round  about  the  most  potent.' 

Harthe,  crying  out  aloud  "A  Lorde,  4  W.  Dugdale,  153  ;  Herbert,  205, 

a  Lorde,  &c." — Then  he  descendeth  254;   F.  A.  Inderwick,  Calendar  of 

and   goeth  to  dance,  &c,  &  after  the  I.   T.   Records,  i.  xxxiv,  3,  75, 

he  calleth  his  Court,  every  one  by  171,  183. 


416  FOLK  DRAMA 

in  1 56 1  at  which  Lord  Robert  Dudley,  afterwards  earl  of 
Leicester,  was  constable-marshal.  He  took  the  title  of 'Pala- 
philos,  prince  of  Sophie,'  and  instituted  an  order  of  knights 
of  Pegasus  in  the  name  of  his  mistress  Pallas  l.  In  1594  the 
Inner  Temple  had  an  emperor, who  sent  an  ambassador  to  the 
revels  of  Gray's  Inn2.  In  1627  the  appointment  of  a  Lord  of  Mis- 
rule led  to  a  disturbance  between  the  '  Temple  Sparks '  and  the 
city  authorities.  The  '  lieutenant '  claimed  to  levy  a  '  droit'  upon 
dwellers  in  Ram  Alley  and  Fleet  Street.  The  lord  mayor  inter- 
vened, an  action  which  led  to  blows  and  the  committal  of  the 
lieutenant  to  the  counter,  whence  he  escaped  only  by  obtain- 
ing the  mediation  of  the  attorney-general,  and  making  sub- 
mission 3.  A  set  of  orders  for  Christmas  issued  by  the  Bench 
in  1632  forbade  '  any  going  abroad  out  of  the  Circuit  of  this 
House,  or  without  any  of  the  Gates,  by  any  Lord  or  other 
Gentleman,  to  break  open  any  House,  or  Chamber;  or  to  take 
anything  in  the  name  of  Rent,  or  a  distress  V 

The  Middle  Temple  held  its  '  solemn  revels '  and  '  post 
revels '  on  All  Saints  and  Candlemas  days,  and  on  the 
Saturdays  between  these  dates ;  likewise  its  '  solemn  Christ- 
masses5.'  An  account  of  the  Christmas  of  1599  was  written 
by  Sir  Benjamin  Rudyerd  under  the  title  of  Nodes  Templariae: 
or,  A  Brief e  Chronicle  of  the  Dark  Reigne  of  the  Bright  Prince 
of  Burning  Love-.  '  Sur  Martino  '  was  the  Prince,  and  one 
'  Milorsius  Stradilax '  served  as  butt  and  buffoon  to  the 
company.  A  masque  and  barriers  at  court,  other  masques 
and  comedies,  a  progress,  a  mock  trial,  a  '  Sacrifice  of  Love,' 
visits  to  the  Lord  Mayor  and  to  and  from  Lincoln's  Inn, 
made  up  the  entertainment6.     In  1631  orders  for  Christmas 

1  G.  Legh,  Accedens  of  Armory  century  the  lieutenant  was  only  an 
(1562),  describes  the  proceedings  ;      officer  of  the  constable-marshal. 

cf.   Dugdale,   151;    Herbert,    248;  *  Dugdale,  149  ;  Herbert,  201. 

Inderwick, op.cit.\xiv,2\<).  Machyn,  6  Dugdale,    202,    205;    Herbert, 

273,    mentions   the   riding  through  215,  231,  235. 

London  of  this  '  lord  of  mysrull  'on  b  J.    A.    Manning,    Memoirs    of 

Dec.  27.  Rudyerd,    9.      Carleton    wrote    to 

2  Cf.  references  for  Gesta  Grayo-  Chamberlain  on  Dec.  29,  1601,  that 
rum  in  p.  417.  '  Mrs.  Nevill,  who  played  her  prizes, 

3  Ashton,  1 55,  quoting  The  Reign  and  bore  the  belle  away  in  the 
of  King  Charles  (1655)  'A  Lieu-  Prince  de  Amour's  revels,  is  sworn 
tenant,  which  we  country  folk  call  maid  of  honour'  (Cat.  S.  P.  Dom. 
a  Lord  of  Misrule.'    In  the  sixteenth  Eliz.  1601-3,  136). 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  417 

government  were  made  by  the  Bench1.  In  1635  a  Cornish 
gentleman,  Francis  Vivian,  sat  as  Prince  d'Amour.  It  cost 
him  £2,000,  but  after  his  deposition  he  was  knighted  at 
Whitehall.  His  great  day  was  February  24,  when  he  enter- 
tained the  Princes  Palatine,  Charles,  and  Rupert,  with 
Davenant's  masque  of  the  Triumphs  of  the  Prince  cC Amour*. 
There  is  no  very  early  mention  of  revels  at  Gray's  Inn,  but 
they  were  held  on  Saturdays  between  All  Saints  and  Candlemas 
about  1529,  and  by  1550  the  solemn  observation  of  Christmas 
was  occasionally  used.  In  1585  the  Bench  forbade  that  any 
one  should  '  in  time  of  Christmas,  or  any  other  time,  take 
upon  him,  or  use  the  name,  place,  or  commandment  of  Lord, 
or  any  such  other  like3.'  Nevertheless  in  1594  one  of  the 
most  famous  of  all  the  legal  '  solemn  Christmasses  '  was  held 
at  this  Inn.  Mr.  Henry  Helmes,  of  Norfolk,  was  '  Prince  of 
Purpoole4,'  and  he  had  the  honour  of  presenting  a  mask 
before  Elizabeth.  This  was  written  by  Francis  Davison,  and 
Francis  Bacon  also  contributed  to  the  speeches  at  the  revels. 
But  the  great  glory  of  this  Christmas  came  to  it  by  accident. 
On  Innocents'  day  there  had  been  much  confusion,  and  the 
invited  Templarians  had  retired  in  dudgeon.  To  retrieve  the 
evening  'a  company  of  base  and  common  fellows  '  was  brought 
in  and  performed  'a  Comedy  of  Errors,  like  to  Plautus  his 
Menaechmus  V  In  1617  there  was  again  a  Prince  of  Purpoole, 
on  this  occasion  for  the  entertainment  of  Bacon  himself  as 
Lord  Chancellor6.     Orders  of  1609  and   1628    mention   re- 

1  Dugdale,  191.  Knightsbridge,  Knight  of  the  most 

2  G.  Garrard  to  Strafford  (Straf     heroical  Order  of  the  Helmet,  and 
ford  Letters,  i.  507) ;  Warton,  iii.     Sovereign  of  the  same.' 

321  ;  Ward,  iii.  173.  B    Halliwell  -  Phillipps,    i.     122; 

3  Dugdale,  285  ;  Herbert,  333  ;  Ward,  ii.  27,  628 ;  Sandys,  93  ; 
R.  J.  Fletcher,  Pension  Book  of  Spedding,  Works  of  Bacon,  viii. 
Gray's  Inn  (1901),  xxviii,  xxxix,  235;  S.Lee,  Life  of  Shakespeare, 
xlix,  68  and  passim.  7° ;  W.  R.  Douthwaite,  Gray's  Inn, 

4  His  full  title  was 'The  High  and  227  ;  Fletcher,  107.  A  full  descrip- 
Mighty  Prince  Henry,  Prince  of  Pur-  tion  of  the  proceedings  is  in  the 
poole,  Arch-duke  of  Stapulia  and  Gesta  Grayorum  (1688),  reprinted 
Bemardia,Duke  of  High  and  Nether  in  Nichols,  Progresses  of  Elizabeth, 
Holborn,  Marquis  of  St.  Giles  and  iii.  262. 

Tottenham,     Count     Palatine     of  6  Douthwaite,  op.  cit.  234 ;  Flet- 

Bloomsbury  and  Clerkenwell,  Great  cher,  72,  299  ;  Nichols,  Progresses 

Lord  of  the  Cantons  of  Islington,  of  fames  I,  iii.  466.     To  this  year 

Kentish    Town,    Paddington     and  belong  the  proceedings  of  '  Henry 

CHAMBERS.     I  E    e 


418  FOLK  DRAMA 

spectively  the  '  twelve '  and  the  '  twenty '  days  of  Christmas 
as  days  of  license,  when  caps  may  be  doffed  and  cards  or  dice 
played  in  the  hall ! :  and  the  duration  of  the  Gray's  Inn  revels 
is  marked  by  notices  of  Masters  of  the  Revels  as  late  as  1682 
and  even  1734  2. 

Nobles  and  even  private  gentlemen  would  set  up  a  Lord 
of  Misrule  in  their  houses.     The  household  regulations  of  the 
fifth   earl   of  Northumberland    include  in  a  list  of  rewards 
usually  paid  about  1522,  one  of  twenty  shillings  if  he  had  an 
'Abbot  of  Miserewll'  at  Christmas,  and  this  officer,  like  his 
fellow  at  court,  was  distinct  from  the  '  Master  of  the  Revells  ' 
for  whom  provision  is  also  made  :i.     In  1556  the  marquis  of 
Winchester,  then  lord  treasurer,  had  a  '  lord  of  mysrulle '  in 
London,  who  came  to  bid  my  lord   mayor  to  dinner  with 
'  a   grett   mene   of  musysyonars  and  dyssegyssyd '  amongst 
whom  'a  dullvyll  shuting  of  fyre '  and  one  'lyke  Deth  with 
a  dart  in  hand4.'     In  1634  Richard  Evelyn  of  Wotton,  high 
sheriff  of  Surrey  and    Sussex,  issued  '  Articles '  appointing 
Owen    Flood   his    trumpeter  'Lord  of  Misrule  of  all  good 
Orders  during  the  twelve  dayes  V     The  custom  was  imitated 
by  more  than  one  municipal  ape  of  gentility.    The  lord  mayor 
and  sheriffs  of  London  had  their  Lords  of  Misrule  until  the 
court  of  common  council  put  down  the  expense  in  1554  6. 
Henry  Rogers,  mayor  of   Coventry,   in   151 7,  and    Richard 
Dutton,    mayor    of    Chester,    in    1567,    entertained    similar 
officers 7. 

I  have  regarded  the  Lord  of  Misrule,  amongst  the  courtly 
and  wealthy  classes  of  English  society,  as  a  direct  offshoot 
from  the  vanished  Feast  of  Fools.  The  ecclesiastical  sugges- 
tion in  the  alternative  title,  more  than  once  found,  of '  Abbot 

the   Second,'    Prince   of  Purpoole,         2  Douthwaite,  op.  cit.  243,  245. 
printed  by  Nichols,  Eliz.  iii.  320,         3  Percy,  N.  H.  B.  344,  346. 
as  the  'Second  Part'  of  the  Gesta         4  Machyn,  125. 
Gray  or um  ;    cf.    Hazlitt,    Manual,         5  Archaeologia,yM\\\.i^2>\  Ashton, 

95,161.  '  Henry  the  Second,  Prince  144.     Other  passages  showing  that 

of    Graya    and    Purpulia,'    was    a  lords  of  misrule  were  appointed  in 

subscriber  to  Minsheu's  Dictionary  private  houses  are  given  by  Hazlitt- 

(1617).     An  earlier  Prince  of  Pur-  Brand,  i.  272. 
poole  is  recorded  in  1587  (Fletcher,         6  Ashton,  144;  cf.  p.  407. 
78).  7  Hist,  of  Cov.  in  Fordun,  Scoti- 

1  Dugdale,   281,   286;    Herbert,  chronicon,    ed.    Hearne,   v.  1450  ; 

334,  336.  Morris,  353. 


MASKS  AND  MISRULE  419 

of  Misrule,'  seems  to  justify  this  way  of  looking  at  the  matter. 
But  I  do  not  wish  to  press  it  too  closely.  For  after  all  the 
Lord  of  Misrule,  like  the  Bishop  of  Fools  himself,  is  only 
a  variant  of  the  winter  '  king '  known  to  the  folk.  In  some 
instances  it  is  difficult  to  say  whether  it  is  the  folk  custom  or 
the  courtly  custom  with  which  you  have  to  do.  Such  is  the 
'  kyng  of  Crestemesse '  of  Norwich  in  1443  *•  Such  are  the 
Lords  of  Misrule  whom  Machyn  records  as  riding  to  the  city 
from  Westminster  in  1557  and  Whitechapel  in  1561  2.  And 
there  is  evidence  that  the  term  was  freely  extended  to  folk 
'  kings  '  set  up,  not  at  Christmas  only,  but  at  other  times  i*n 
the  year3.  It  was  a  folk  and  a  Christmas  Lord  whose  attempted 
suppression  by  Sir  Thomas  Corthrop,  the  reforming  curate 
of  Harwich,  got  him  into  trouble  with  the  government  of 
Henry  VIII  in  1535  4.  And  it  was  folk  rather  than  courtly 
Lords  which,  when  the  reformers  got  their  own  way,  were 
hardest  hit  by  the  inhibitions  contained  in  the  visitation 
articles  of  archbishop  Grindal  and  others 5.  So  this  discussion. 
per  ambages  atque  aequora  vectus,  comes  round  to  the  point  at 
which  it  began.  It  is  a  far  cry  from  Tertullian  to  Bishop 
Grosseteste  and  a  far  cry  from  Bishop  Grosseteste  to  Arch- 
bishop Grindal,  but  each  alike  voices  for  his  own  day  the 
relentless  hostility  of  the  austerer  clergy  during  all  ages  to 
the  ineradicable  ludi  of  the  pagan  inheritance. 

1  Cf.  p.  261.  s  Cf.  p.  173. 

2  Machyn,  162,  274.  The  West-  *  Brewer,  ix.  364.  The  lord  of 
minster  lord  seems  to  have  been  misrule  was  chosen  in  the  church 
treated  with  scant  courtesy,  for  'to  solace  the  parish'  at  Christ- 
'  he  was  browth  in-to  the  contur  in  mas. 

the   Pultre;   and  dyver  of  ys  men         8  Cf.  p.  181. 
lay  all  nyght  ther.' 


END   OF   VOL.    I 


Chambers,  (Sir)  Edmund 
Kerchever 

The  mediaeval  stage 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 


UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY