Skip to main content

Full text of "Memoir of William Plumer, Senior"

See other formats


This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 






A"*' J ■'-i..**' -. 

^ ki ■ 

1 11^(9' 6."^ 

!^et*^ ,^.'^ft>c^ 

^5^, Z'*^/ 


• / 






BepriDted from the Nkw-EkgIiA^s IIistobical A2» Gsmxalogicaj. BaoiSTn for January, 1871, 




\u »'^^, ^ '^ 








The period comprised between the years 1750 and 1820 is, in many res- 
pects, the most important and interesting in our annals. Early in that period 
the power of France was expelled from the continent, after many at- 
tempts, in which New-England bore a prominent part In these contests 
her citizens learned to use the weapons and endure the hardships of war ; they 
learned, also, to counsel and act together in a common cause. This was a provi- 
dential preparation for events then near at hand. Early, too, the irritations 
and jealousies which had disturbed the relations of the mother country and 
many of her American colonies increased in violence, and at last terminated 
in a war in which the lives and fortunes of the whole people were put in 
jeopardy, and no portion of the country escaped the sacrifice of its wealth 
and prosperity. 

The close of the contest brought with it a work of greater magnitude than 
the war itself, and questions more difficult of solution than any which had 
ever before tasked the intelligent patriotism of the people. They were now 
called to organize forms of government, local and general, and to frame laws, 
and other institutions of civil and social order, suited to their new condition. 
Then came the ordeal in which this complex machinery of federate and local 
authority was put to the proof; the domestic and foreign policy of the young 
republic instituted ; and the relations of the States, to each other and to the 
federal government, defined by laws and judicial decisions. 

While this vast labor and responsibility fell mainly upon a few men, the work 
of building up the commercial and industrial interests of the country stimulated 
the energies of the entire people. The whole period was emphatically one 
of those eras which beget and educate men of strong intellectual and moral 
natures, and of marked individuality of character. In the number of such 
men, we may properly include the subject of this sketch. In regard to his 
life and character, it is fortunate that we are not dependent upon the uncer- 
tainty and inexactitude of tradition, which is often the sole depository of the 
most considerable part of the personal history of our fathers ; but that, on the 
contrary, we have his biography* from the accomplished pen of one whom 
filial love and reverence could inspire, but neither blind nor mislead. To 
that biography we are mainly indebted for the following facts. 

> Life of William Plumer, by his son, "William Plumer, Junior. Edited, with a sketch of 
the Author's Life, by A. P. Peabody. Boston : Phillips, Sampson & Co. 1856. 8vo. pp . 
xiL and 513. 


4 William Plumerj Senior. ^ 

William Plumer was born in Newbury, Mass., June 25, 1759, and waa^ 
of the fifth generation in descent from Francis Plumer, one of the origin r * 
grantees of that township, where he settled in 1635, and the common ancesj 
it is claimed, of nearly all in the United States who bear this family nj 
His father, Samuel Plumer, born June 14, 1722, and his mother, Mar^tOlole) 
natives, also, of Newbury, were married April 8, 1755, and shortly aflftrward 
removed to that part of the town, which was subsequently incor^porated as. 
the town of Newburyport. There Mr. Samuel Plumer carried on mercantile 
and manufacturing pursuits till 1768, when he bought a farm and settled in 
Epping, county of Rockingham, New-Hampshire. 

At that time, the population of Epping was about 1500 persons, who 
were mostly farmers and dependent upon their daily labor. The town- 
schools were few in number, short in duration, and poor in quality. 

While a resident of Newburyport young Plumer's intellectuaJ quickness 
and capacity had .attracted the attention of his pastor, the Reverend Mr. 
Parsons, and of Mr. Sewall, the schoolmaster, who urged Mr. Plumer to give 
his son a collegiate education ; but this advice was not adopted, and on his 
removal tq Epping, he determined to bring up his son as a farmer. The boy 
worked upon the ferm steadily till he was twenty years old, e^tcept short 
terms of attendance at the district school, from which he ceased in his seven- 
teenth year. As he grew in years, he manifested an increasing thirst for 
knowledge, and devoured every book upon which he could lay his hands. 
At that time, however, neither the scanty library at home, nor the not less 
scanty library of his neighbors, could furnish much gratification to his eager 
appetite, but whenever in the town or its vicinity he could find a book, 
new or old, he mastered its contents. 

His father and mother were respected for their industrious, frugal and re- 
ligious lives, and their children were trained in habits of virtue, industry, 
order and punctuality. Under such examples and infiuences, William -grew 
to manhood, inheriting his father's large physical proportions, but not his 
athletic strength and sound constitution. 

Though there was little within the narrow circle of his daily life to excite 
his mind or stimulate ambition, yet he Was not inattentive to the stirring 
events then taking place in the neighboring provinces. He heard the causes 
and the progress of the War discussed around the family hearth, or among 
his townsmen, and his interest in the struggle would have sent him to the 
field had his health been adequate to that service. 

In 1779, being then in his twentieth year, he became a subject of reli^ous 
convictions under the labors of the Reverend Mr. Shephei*d, the Baptist 
minister of the town ; was admitted to the church of that denomination, and 
shortly afterward became an exhorter, and then a preacher, though never 
ordained to the ministry. He travelled at his will over the thickly settled 
parts of the State, and delivered his message, generally once and often twice 
a day, to large and attentive congregations. Many of his hearers were led 
to make a profession of religion. Competent witnesses of his labors and 
auditors of his discourses testified at a later day, in terms of admiration, to 
his simple but forcible language, charming voice, logical reasoning, command 
of the Scriptures, and extraordinary zeal. 

In about a year and a half from the commencement of his preaching a 
change occurred in his theological opinions, and thereupon he abandoned 
forever any idea he may have had of making the ministry his vocation. 



fVilliam Plumer, Senior. 6 

TMs short experience be£[>re the people exerted a favorable effect upon hia 
subsequent career. He made many acquaintances, also, and not a few of 
these were afterward among his clients and political supporters. 

From this period till 1784, his time was chiefly occupied on the farm, but 
his leisure hours were devoted to study, and especially to the consideration 
of questions then agitating the public mind. His attention was particularly 
called to the proposed constitution of the State. This instrument contain^ 
what he regarded as intolerant restrictions upon religious liberty, of which het 
was a conspicuous and faithful champion throughout his life. 

In 1784, he entered the .law-office of Joshua Atherton, of Amherst, but 
remained there only a short time.* He was now in his twenty-sixth year, 
and his advanced age, coupled with his parents' strong aversion to the law 
as a profession, led him to hesitate about pursuing his studies any further. 
The next year he was chosen a representative to the legislature, and during 
the ensuing session entered his protest, singly and alone, against the passage 
of a measure, on the ground of its unconstitutionality. The court subset 
quentlv pronounced the law unconstitutional upon the same ground as that 
on which he had based his protest, and at the followiDg session thQ law wa^ 
repealed. This £Eict exhibits the spirit of independence and fearlessness 
which characterized his entire public life. It is also proof that, to some ex- 
tent, he. bad already mastered the princij^ of public law, and possessed tjbiei 
sagacity requisite to apply them to the practical business of legislation. 

Upon*8everal occasions, this yeajr, his interest in the law was renewed, and 
m September, having first gained the consent of his parents, he entered tba 
office of John Prentice, of Londonderry. There he pursued bis studies witk 
diligence and fidelity till November, 1787, when, upon the unsolicited recom-* 
mendatioa of the bar, and without the usually required examination, he was 
admitted to practice. 

At that time the library of a country lawyer contained only a few books; 
but this circumstance was not unfavorable to the acquirement of a thorough 
knowledge of the general principles of law, though not conducive to that 
liberal culture which may be gained from the large libraries and the profe»» 
sional schools of the present day. Mr. Plumer did not derive much aid from 
his instructor, but by dint of hard study and patient application he laid a 
good foundation for future acquisitions. 

In 1786, he was again a member of the legislature, and still further en^ 
larged his acquaintance with the leading men of the State, and with public 

Upon his admission to the bar he opened an office in Epping, and theit» 
resided during the remainder of his life. His practice was considerabJa at 
the first, and it steadily increased until he entered public life. 

At the period when Mr. Plumer began practice, the state of the law par* 
took of the confused and unsettled condition of public afiairs. During tho 
first years of the war judicial tribunals were created, but without well-defined 
powers ; and the judges were generally selected for their good sense and 
weight of character alone. Indeed, before, during, and for some years after 
the war, few of the judges were men who had been educated either in the 
theory or practice of the law. The revolution, moreover, brought in new 
ideas and a spirit which was not inclined to be fettered, either by the letter or 

> Hl« fellow student there was William Coleman, ofterwtrd the distinguished editor of 
the N. Y. Evening Post. , 


6 William Plumer, Senior. 

spirit of the law, as promulgated at Westminster Hall ; and the judges, for the 
most part, were as little qualified as disposed to administer the law in its strict- 
ness, either as a science or as a rule of practice. The character of the bench, 
which usually represents the average ability and character of the bar, grad- 
ually improved, and within the memory of living men the judiciary of New- 
Hampshire obtained a deserved reputation for ability and learning scarcely, 
if at all, inferior to that of any other tribunal in the United States. Among 
those who from time to time adorned that bench, might be named several 
who have contributed valuable additions to the fund of legal and historical 
literature.* Quite as seldom as in any other park of New-England, have the 
judges of that State been selected on account of past or prospective party 
services, or failed to appreciate the solemn responsibilities of their high office. 
As a general rule, moreover, they have been not only men of sufficient 
learning, but also gentlemen. 

Not only was the state of the law in 1787 such as we have described, but 
there were few well-read lawyers, and yet there were many able and distin- 

fiished men in the profession. Among these were John Pickering, John 
ullivan, John Prentice, Joshua Atherton, William Bt. Atkinson, Jonathan 
M. Sewall, William Parker, Oliver Peabody, and Daniel Humphries. 
Several eminent lawyers of other States then frequently practised in New- 
Hampshire ; among whom were Bradbury of Maine, and Dexter and Parsons 
of Massachusetts. Afterward Samuel Bell, Edward St. Loe Livermore, 
Arthur Livermore, George Sullivan, Jeremiah Smith, Jeremiah* Mason, 
Daniel Webster and others came to the same bar, who exemplified what 
Judge Story styled " the vast law-learning and the prodigious intellectual 
power of the New-Hampshire bar." 

The imited effijrts of these men raised the law from the state of uncer- 
tainty which had characterized its administration and practice, and aided in 
giving to the State a body of judicial decisions which command the respect 
of the profession at large. To have successfully coped with such men, as 
did Mr. Plumer, is sufficient proof of his ability. And it was in this arena 
that he was really bred to the law, and in which he proved himself an apt 
pupil. In course of time, moreover, he came to be one of the leaders of 
the bar, and is entitled to the credit of having, in several important instances, 
suggested to the courts, and through them to the legislature, principles of 
law which passed into enduring statutes. 

At that time a New-Hampshire lawyer was required to fill the offices of 
attorney, counsellor, conveyancer and advocate, and these several duties, with 
much other incidental labor, both in and out of court, rendered the work of 
the profession far more arduous than it is at present. In addition to this, it 
was the custom for the bar to follow the court in its circuit of the State. In 
order to fulfil these duties satisfactorily to his clients and to the court, there 
was required of the lawyer versatility of talents, capacity for labor, and good 

The published decisions of the supreme court of New-Hampshire date from 
1816, and, other than a few, brief manuscript notes now in private hands, 
there is no report of the cases adjudicated before that year. But it is certain 

» Joel Parker, Ira Perley, the late Samnel D. Bell, and Timothy Farrar— whose " Manual 
of the Constitution of the United States," recently published by Little, Brown & Co., is no 
less remarkable for its leaminfr, eiihaastiye analysis, and faultless rhetoric, than as the 
work of an octogenarian. 

William Plumer, Senior* 7 

that there was then no dearth of busmess before the courts ; and though the 
dockets of that period will not show any such cases as now arise in profusion 
under our law of railways, insurance, revenue, manufactures, and commerce, 
yet there were not a few causes of in>-^ ^ce, and of these Mr. Plumer had 
his share. - =* 

No profession demands of its V6caries the exercise of higher virtues or 
more varied abilities than does the law. To meet that demand the lawyer must 
bring to his work a mind trained and enriched by study ; a body that never 
tires ; a zeal that never languishes ; and over all this, as a sentinel, that 
sense of right and wrong, which neither flattery, nor bribes, nor selfish am- 
bition can corrupt or expel. The current of his professional life intermingles 
with the familiar concerns of his friends and neighbors. He is their trusted 
counsellor ; their shield against oppression ; the sworn defender of their lives, 
property and honor. His bosom receives and holds with inviolable faith 
their choicest secrets ; his hand shapes and fortifies the channels of their 
benefactions and executes their dying bequests. But the theatre on which 
he prosecutes his labors, wins his victories, and suffers his defeats, is generally 
far removed from public observation. Yet the forces he employs are not in- 
ferior in quality or degree to those which, on more conspicuous fields, win 
from a gratefiil people, or successful party, their loudest applause or most 
substantial rewards. The warrior, the statesman, the poet, the inventor, the 
martyr, and the patriot, all live in commemorative bronze or marble, or on 
the page of history ; but the lawyer is seldom honored by any visible monu- 
ment; seldom leaves any more permanent memorial of his work than 
vague tradition. 

From the first Mr. Plumer took a keen interest in political questions 
which then, more than such questions do now, engaged the attention of all 
classes of the people. He represented his town in the legislature in 1788, 
1790 and 1791, and in the latter year was speaker of the house. He was 
also a member of the convention of 1791, for the revision of the constitu- 
tion. He took an active part in the legislature, both in drafting bills aftid 
in advocating their passage. " In the convention," said Judge Livermore, 
" he was the most influential member ; so much so, that those who disliked 
the result called it the Plumer constitution, by way of insinuating that it 
was the work of one man." He served on nearly all the important com- 
mittees, and as chairman of several of them. As evidence of his activity, it is 
said by his biographer that three-fourths of all the papers and documents 
relating to the constitutional convention of 1791, except its journal, are in 
his hand-writing. Many of the most important amendments were adopt- 
ed on his suggestion, and he energetically opposed the retention of those few 
provisions which at a later day were subjects of proposed amendment. No 
attempt was made to alter the constitution for the next sixty years, and it 
remains substantially as it was adopted : a monument of its authors' sagacity. 

For the next six years, declining all offices, he devoted himself diligently 
to his profession. It is evident, however, from his correspondence, that he 
was deeply interested in public affairs. Under date of May 29, 1797, he 
wrote to Mr. Gordon, then in congress : — 

"I am pleased with the President's [Adams] speech, which manifests in strong 
terms his love of country. This is what we most want ; not love nor hatred towards 
other countries, but attachment to our own. I wait with anxiety for the answer of 
your house. I truijt it will be in language worthy of freemen, firm and fedeiul. 

8 William Pltimer, Senior. 

Some think that after the insults and irgurics we have received from France fo^ ^^ HjV 

be dishonorable to attempt further negotiation. 1 am not of that opinion, jl . ^^ W 
not sacrifice the peace and prosperity of my country to resentments, however jusJi", <! 

the one hand, nor to the etiquette of State on the other." x 

He was speaker of the house again in 1797, and also a member in 1798' 
1800, and 1801. About this time he was repeatedly urged to be a candi- ' 
date for congress, but he declined all such calls, on account of the precari- 
ous state of his health and the demands of his profession. In 1802, how- 
ever, without being consulted, he was elected to the senate of the United 
States, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Mr. Sheafe. In de- 
ference to the wishes of friends, he reluctantly accepted the office. This 
election, under the circumstances and in view of the large number of able 
men from whom the selection was made, adds weight, if that were needed, 
to Mr. Webster's statement that, at this time, Mr. Plumer was regarded as 
the ablest man in the Federal party of the State. 

Mr. Plumer's senatorial service began soon after the election of Mr. Jeffer-* 
son, and when the current of public opinion had begun to set in favor of the 
doctrines and policy of the Kepublican party of that day. He acted with 
the Federal party on all leading measures, but never sacrificed his indepen- 
dence, or opportunities of exercising a wholesome influence upon legislation, 
by a blind adherence to party policy or an excessive display of party feeling. 
He was thus also enabled to exert himself with considerable success to mod- 
erate the intense political asperities that then affected social and congress- 
ional circles at the seat of government. 

Among the questions of importance which came before the senate during 
his term were those relating to our treaty-right of deposit of merchandise in 
New-Orleans, which was disputed by the Spanish authorities ; the purchase 
of the Louisiana territory ; the proposed amendment of the constitution in 
reference to choice of electors of president and vice president; the impeach- 
ment of Judge Pickering, and the attempted impeachment of Judge Chase ; 
the purchase of Florida, and non-intercourse with England. IJpon some 
of these questions Mr. Plumer spoke and with efiect. Several of his speeches 
are extant They are comparatively brief, but clear, forcible and senten- 
tious arguments. He rarely addressed the senate, and never except when he 
had something to say upon the question immediately under consideration. 

Before the close of his term of ofiice, in 1807, the Jefferson party had 
gained the ascendancy in New-Hampshire, and Mr. Plumer was not a can-* 
didate for re-election. Though he was now only forty-eight years of age, 
and his health was quite restored, yet he decided not to return to the prac- 
tice of the law. But so active and inquisitive a mind as his could not long 
remain idle. 

While in congress he had collected with no little difficulty, even then, a 
very complete set of public documents, and this collection suggested to him 
the idea of writing a history of the government from the declaration of inde- 
pendence to the dose of Mr. Jefferson's administration. Subsequently he 
enlarged his plan so as to include a general history of the country from its 
discovery to his own time. This plan embraced a great variety of topics, in 
which little of interest or value escaped his attention. In preparation for 
this great undertaking he began a course of reading, and, as far as possible, 
of original investigation. To Mr. John Quincy Adams, under date of July 
11, 1809, he virrote that he intended to devote the remainder of his days to 


William Plitmer, Senior* 9 

J* * this work. He had made considerable progress in it when he was again 
' called by his fellow citizens to serre them, under circumstances that did not 
well admit of a refusal. From that service he did not escape for several 
years, and never made much further attempt to complete the history. This 
18 to be regretted, especially with reference to that part which related to the 
'early history of the government under the constitution. For such an under- 
taking he had not a few requisites : an extensive acqusdntance with leading 
men ; ezperienoe in publi<2 aflfairs ; an understanding, strong, practical, and 
disciplined by professional pursuits ; and habits of thought in which accuracy, 
clearness and philosophical method were conspicuous. 

He received encouragement in this purpose from Mr. Jefferson, and others 
not less competent to advise in such matters. The following extracts from 
a letter of John Quincy Adams, dated August 16, 1809, when he was on his 
way to the Court of Russia, will serve to aid the reader in ferming an esd- 
mate of Mr. Plumer% 

«< • • # The confidence with which I shall receive from you intelligence or 
opinions will be founded on a sentiment very deeply rooted in my experience and 
observation, that you see more dearly and jud^e more coolly ot men and things 
relating to the political world than almost any other man with whom it has been my 
fortune to act in public life. * * * It affords me constant pleasure to recollect thai 
the history of our country has fallen into the hands of such a man. For as impar- 
tiality lies at the bottom of all historic truth, I have often been not without my 
apprehensions that no true history of our own times would appear at least in the 
course of our aa^e ; that we should have nothinj^ but Federalist histories or Republic 
can histories, New-Enffland histories or Virginia histories, • * * But of men who 
unite both qualities — uiat of having had a practical knowledge of our affairs, and 
that of possessing a mind capable of impartiality, in summing up the merits of our 
governments, administrations, oppositions, and people — 1 know not another man with 
whom I have ever had the opportunity of formmg an acquaintance, on the correct^ 
ness of whose narrative I should so implicitly rely. Such an historian * * will be 
a legislator without needing constituents. You have so Jong meditated upon your 
plan, and so much longer upon the duties of man in society, as they apply to the 
taransactions of your own life, that I am well assured your work will carry a profound 
moral with it. And I hope * • that the moral of your history will be the indis- 
soluble uni(m of the North American colonies." 

This is not the place to disturb the ashes of the embittered political 
feuds which prevailed from 1800 to 1815, and which ended in the virtual 
death of one of the great historic parties concerned in them. But it is 
germane to our present purpose to say that Mr. Plumer, who had been 
educated as a Federalist and had acted with his party quite uniformly, even 
going so far as to suggest, at one time, that a dissolution of the Union might 
be a necessary remedy for what was deemed by many to be unconstitutional 
legislation and executive usurpation, had however, upon more mature con- 
sideration, withdrawn from that unwise position, and, though differing from 
Mr. Madison and Mr. Munroe in their general policy, now stood firmly in de- 
fence and support of his own country against the encroachments and un- 
friendly policy of foreign powers. Thenceforth his opposition to any 
measure relating to our foreign or domestic policy, ceased at the moment 
when he saw that further resistance would weaken the arm of his own gov- 
ernment or encourage her enemies. In this he characteristically pursued that 
independent and patriotic course which distinguishes the statesman from 
the partizan. 

By the year 1810 party ties had in some measure relaxed; issues once 
vital had died out, and new combinations were forming on fresh issues. It 

10 William Flumer, Senior. 

became necessary, therefore, that they who coincided with the administi'a- 
tion should select their candidates from such as agreed with them on 
leading questions, without much regard to minor differences. By this party 
jMr. Plumer was elected to the State senate, in the year last named, and 
chosen president of that body. His competitor for the senate was George 
Sullivan, son of General, and Governor, John Sullivan, and father of the late ' 
John Sullivan, attorney-general of the State for some years, as were his 
father and grandfather. George Sullivan was a naan of commanding abili- 
ties and popular manners, and subsequently received high honors from his 
party. At this session, Mr. Plumer was appointed chairman of a committee 
for reporting a new judiciary systemi, and of another for the revision of the 
Jaws. He declined both places. 

Upon the retirement of the veteran John Langdon in 1812, Mr. Plumer 
was nominated for the oflSce of governor, in opposition to Ex- Gov. John 
Taylor Gilman, who was afterward repeatedly elected — a man of strong 
personal and political influence, and the chief representative of one of the 
historic families of the State. There was no choice by the people, but Mr, 
Plumer was elected by the legislature. At the next session he was 
nominated for the United States senate, but declined. During this year 
he was oflScially interested in the erection of the State-prison, and in the 
revision of the criminal code. 

He failed of an election in 1813 ; Gov. Gilman succeeding by a majority 
of two hundred and fifty votes, out of a total of more than thirty-five thou- 
sand cast. This election turned upon the foreign policy of the federal ad- 
ministration. Like causes operating, he was again defeated by Gov. Gilman 
in 1814 and 1815 ; in the latter year by an adverse majority of thirty-five 
votes. In 1816, Gov. Plumer was elected over Mr. Sheafe, and again 
urged to accept a seat in the senate of the United States. In 1817, he was 
re-elected by a majority of more than three thousand votes over Mr. Sheafe, 
Jeremiah Mason, and other candidates. In 1818, he was re-elected by a 
msyprity of upward of six thousand votes, over all candidates, including 

Jeremiah Smith, afterward " * -^r ^^^^ chief-justice. These repeated 

elections to the highest office in the gift of the people of the State, by con- 
stantly increased majorities and over such competitors, is more conclusive 
proof of the real standing and influence of the successful candidate than 
are similar instances in more modern times. This year he was again un- 
successfully urged to permit the use of his name for the office of senator. 

As governor, Mr. Plumer was far from being the mere partizan, an4. 
uniformly gave his sanction to those measures only which seemed to be de- '^^ 
manded by or likely to conduce to the general welfare. In his appoint- 
ments to office, of which he had an unusual number to make, and particu- 
larly in the selection of judges, special fitness for the office to be filled 
availed more in determining his action than the strongest personal or politi- 
cal attachments. 

His messages were characterized by sagacious and practical views. He 
urged, both by speech and by pen, the reformation of the criminal code, and 
of the laws regulating the administration of justice, the diffusion of educa- 
tion, and the encouragement of all industrial pursuits. He labored espe- 
cially to secure, what was then denied, perfect religious freedom. On all 
questions of a more public nature he took broad and patriotic ground. 

Gov. Plumer's public life terminated in 1819, and he once more entered 

William PlumeTj Senior. 11 

npon the retirement which he had long coveted, and with a degree of eager- 
ness which it is difficult to estimate by any living examples. From this re- 
tirement he never again emerged except for a single day, when, in 1820, he 
cast his Vote, as presidential elector, for John Quincy Adams. 

Having already laid aside the history, to which reference has been made, 
he resumed the work, begun in 1808, of collecting the data for a series of 
sketches of American biography. These sketches number one thousand 
nine hundred and fifty-two, and would make seven or eight closely printed 
octavo volumf»s, embracing the whole circuit of American history and bio- 
graphy. The greater portion of these were left in an unfinished state, and 
Ikave never been published. 

He also wrote and published, from 1820 to 1829, in the newspapers ft 
series of essays, extending to one hundred and eighty-six numbers, which 
had a wide circulation and attracted considerable attention. Among the 
subjects treated were : Freedom of the press, hard times, speculation, in- 
temperance, industry and idleness, virtue and happiness, gaming, lotteries, 
extravagance in dress, furniture and living, insanity, education, agriculture, 
roads, government, commerce, manufactures, banks, paupers, slavery, taxa- 
tion, public debts, wars, the army, the navy, the militia, pensions, schools 
and colleges, the professions of law, medicine, and divinity. Several of 
these essays constitute very complete treatises, and the whole would make 
several volumes. 

While thus engaged he wrote and published, in 1823, an essay on longevi- 
ty, in which he treated at length of the various causes which determine the 
conditions of health and long life. He also collected the names and some- 
thing of the history of about six hundred persons who had reached the age 
of ninety years and upward. A portion of this matter was published in 
the ** Memoirs of the American Academy." In 1824 he published " Re- 
marks on the authenticity of the Wheelwright Deed," in which he maintain- 
ed that the deed in question is entitled to credit. 

His correspondence with public men of all parties, and with scientific men 
and learned societies, at home and abroad, was extensive and valuable. He 
was elected a member of the Academy of Languages and Letters, American 
Antiquarian Society, Massachusetts Historical Society, and the Royal Soci- 
ety of Northern Antiquaries of Copenhagen. In 1823, he assisted in or- 
ganizing the New-Hampshire Historical Society, in which he took a deep 
interest, and to which he gave many of his most valuable books and papers. 
He was the first president of that society. 

The last work that engaged his pen was the life of Thomas Jefferson, 
which he began in 1843, but which he did not complete. As late as 1848, 
he had ceased almost wholly from literary labor. At the age of eighty 
his health was as good as it had usually been, but at eighty-five his memory 
had failed very perceptibly. From that date he slowly and steadily declined 
till the 22d of December, 1850, when, having outlived all his early con- 
temporaries, he passed quietly away, in the ninety-second year of his age. 

The career of Gov. Plumer was exceptional. As we have seen, he was 
essentially a self-made man ; he was also well-made. He entered his pro- 
fession late in life, and had unusual success ; he filled a long term of public 
office with increasing influence and usefulness to the last, and retired to pri- 
vate life while in the full vigor of manhood ; and after that passed the long 
period of over thirty years in the enjoyment of honorable studies, and a 
well-earned fame. 




12 William FlumcVj Senior, 

He was an original and cautious observer, and his information was exten- 
give and practical. He was sincere and fearless in the discharge of duty 
and in the expression of his convictions ; humane to man and beast ;^id fond 
of the society of both young and old, to whose enjoyments he contributed by 
the unostentatious wisdom and vivacity of his conversation and the kindness 
of his manners. 

" In person," says his biographer, " he was tall and erect, his complexion 
dark, his face rather long and thin, his hair black, and his eyes black and 
sparkling, with a look and a smile — when he was pleased himself or would 
jdease others— expressive of the mo&t winning good will. * * In old age, 
his thin grey locks, the mild fire of his eye, and the smile on his lips, gave 
him a beauty and grandeur at once conciliatory and con^mandingj' * * 

Gov. Plumer was married February 12, 1788, to Sally Fowler, of New- 
market, N. H. She was born July 21^ 1762> and died April 1, 1852« 
They had six children :-^ 

1. William, Jr., b, Feb, 9, 1789 ; d. Sept. 18, 1854. 

2. Sally Fowler, b. Nov. 17, 1790 ; d. Sept. 18, 1818. 

3. Samuel, b. Deo. 19, 1792. 

4. George W., b. Feb. 4, 1796. 

5. John Jay, b. Dec. 26, 1799 ; d. May 2, 1849. 

6. Quintus, b. May 5, 1805; d. May SO^ 180a. 



This book should be returned to 
the, Library on or before the last date 
stamped below. 

A fine is incurred by retaining it 
beyond the specified time. 

Please return promptly.