Skip to main content

Full text of "Memorials and letters illustrative of the life and times of John Graham of Claverhouse, viscount Dundee"

See other formats


Google 



This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 





■ 


f 











^■yM/i^,^'-'^'^'^ 




S.vy 



MiUiinu J? harp .JTasfr. 
Ill 



S K^ 



LIFE AND TIMES OF 



JOHN GRAHAM OF CLAVERHOUSE, 



YISCOUNT DUNDEE. 



\ 



\ 



LATELT PUBLISHED. 



I. 

THE OVLT AUTHENTIC LIFE OF THE VALIANT 
XAEQinS OF MONTBOSE. 

In Two Handsome Volumesy 8vo, price 86a. 
Embelliflhed with fine Portraits and Woodcuts. 

MEMOIES OF JAMES GRAHAM, 
FIRST MARQUIS OF MONTROSE, 
From 1612 to 1650; illustrating, from Domestic Papers of the 
Montrose Family recently discovered, and other latent and original 
Documents, his Life, Actions, and Death. 

By MARK NAPIER, Advocate. 



« 
« 



,* To this NEW and VERY COMPLETE Biography of the illnstrions 
and much-maligned Montrose, there is appended a large collection of Illus- 
trative Papers of great importance and interest, and which are NOW FOR 
THE FIRST TIME PRINTED : including his Poems— Notices of the ya- 
rious original Portraits of himself and some of his family circle — Defence 
written in the interval between his Last Victory and First Defeat — Story of 
Montrose's Heart — Ceremony of Collecting his Remains, and the Ti*ue Fune- 
rals thereof, Ac. &c. 



** Mr NApiia Ib a gentleman of very great literary acquirements, and has employed 
great and aniduoiu labour in his inquiries into the history of that great hero and patriot, which 
had been preriously in a great measure summarily or carelessly misrepresented. Indeed, Mr 
Napier's nkw and RBcaNTLV Published Edition Of thb ' Mbmoim or Moktrosb ' is ths 

ONLT OKM upon WHICH AMY RaLIAMCR CAN BB PJUACBD, AKD OP ANT TALUB A8 AN AUTBO- 

arrr or aaPBaaxcB to thb HiaroarAN, ANnqcARY, or btbn thb Gbkbral Rbadbr." 

II. 

CHABLE8 THE SECOHD IN SOOTLAKD. 

In Svo, Cloth Boards, price 10s. 6d. 

Illustrated with a fine Map. 

PERSONAL HISTORY OP KING CHARLES 
THE SECOND, from his landing in Scotland, on June 23. 
1650, till his escape out of England, Octoher 15. 1651 ; with an 
Outline of his Life immediately before and after these dates. 

By the Rev. C. J. LYON, M. A., Cantab., 

IMCUMBElfT OF ST. ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHAPEL, ST. ANDREWS. 

*«* <* The period to which our attention is now directed, is one which excites a pafaifnl 
interest. It is pregnant with lessons of infinite value. It presents the most humiliating views 
of human nature ; and while the hallowed name, and rites, and spirit of religion, were dese- 
crated by its pretended votaries,— by the clergy of the age in particular, without distinction of 
parties,— these memorials present to view an taicaraation of all the worst passions by whidi 
human beings are agitated, and Is a useful and interesting contribution to our civil and eccle- 
iiasacal histofy." 

10- Only Two Hundred and Fifty Copies of this interesting work 

WERE printed. 



MEMORIALS AND LETTERS 



I 

I 



MEMORIALS AND LETTERS 



LIFE AND TIMES OF 



JOHN GRAHAM OF CLAVERHOUSE, 

VISCOUNT DUNDEE. 




EDINBUKOU: 

THOMAS G. STEVENSON, 22 FREDERICK STREET. 

LONDON; HAMILTON. ADAMS. & CO. 

M.DCCC.LIX. 






fidttth in jSlatumers' JIall* 

TIIR AFTHOR OF THIS WORK REflERVBS TO HIMSELF 
THE RIGHT OF TRANSLATION. 



BDINBUAGH : PRTNTED BY MACPHKBMIf & 8YMB, 8T DAVID STREET. 



TO H18 GRACE 

THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH AND QUEENSBERRY, ICG., 

WHOSE LIBERALITY IN AFFORDING UNLIMITED ACCESS TO 
THE WELL PRESERVED ARCHIVES OF QUEENSBERRY, 

HAS IMPARTED TO THESE VOLUMES 
THE INTEREST OF ORIGINALITY, 

AND 
THE VALL^ OF TRUTH, 

THIS DEFENCE OF 

GREAT DUNDEE, 

AGAINST THE CALUMNIES OF HISTORY, 

IS 
GRATEFULLY INSCRIBKH. 




» 



1^^ coun 



The truth and justice of History called for this com- 
pilation of Memorials and original Letters relating to the 
Viscount of Dundee and hia troubled times. The under- 
tttl^ot gi^atly provoked by the domineering anathemas 
of Lord Macaulay against the champion of James the 
Seventh, has been chiefly encouraged by the frank libe- 
rahty of His Grace of Buccleuch, in aflbrding unhmited 
access to that voluminous and valuable, but hitherto 
unexplored repertory of latent history, the Queensberry 
Papern. The principal object of these Memorials is to 
redeem the history of iScotland from the vulgar calumny 
implied in the general recognition of that mythical bete 
noir, " Bloody Clavers." By the light of these lamily 
papers may be read a chamcter of Graham of Claver- 
house very different from what has hitherto obtained, 
even with those who, however incredulous as to its dia- 
bolical phase, have contented themselves witli striving 
to bespeak admiration for the heroism of his euterprize, 
and the devotion of his loyalty. Pre-eminent among 
such stands Sm Waltee Scott, To him the Queensberry 
Papent, with which he appears to have been unacquainted, 
notwithstanding his intimacy with the House of Buc- 
cleuch and Queensberry, would have opened up new 
views of a subject he delighted to handle, and which his 
genius rendered so attractive. Is the absence of that 
information to be regretted ? Would even the truth, as 
regards a few historical characters long gone to their ac- 
count, have compensated present or succeeding genera- 




^ 



INTEODUCrORV. 



tioDS for the loss of any of those life-like personifications 
which animate the best of Scott's historical romancea ? 
And if, ae regards any individual character, we discover 
the plain truth at la^t, so that fanatical calumny shall 
not for ever triumph, is it not well that the fancies of 
the bard of Scotland came first ? For, most assuredly, 
had our great historical poet been previously cognizant 
of all which those family archives contain relating to 
Graham of Claverhouse, the hero of " Old Mortality," as 
we find him in that vivid portraiture, would never have 
seen the light of day, whatever kind of character might 
have been substituted, Scott would not have conceded 
so much as he has done to the sworn enemies of his hero. 
But neither could he, in the pages of romance, have de- 
picted him as he really was ; at least without having 
instituted a controversial exposition to clear his way. 
" Out damned spot !" will not suffice to cleanse the his- 
tory of Scotland, as relates to Claverhouse. In short, 
we know what we have in Sir Walter's hero, but know 
not what might have been, as regards the piquant inte- 
rest of that historical fiction, had the current of his ideas 
been altered. 

So early, however, as the commencement of the pre- 
sent century. Sir Walter's friend, Charles Kibkpatrick 
Sharpe of Hoddam, then a student at Oxford, who had 
already fathomed Wodrow, and detected Laing, — a feat 
to which Charles Fox proved unequal, — conceived the 
bold design of redeeming Dundee, and exposing the 
Covenant. His habits of research, and powers of com- 
position, were well suited to the task. How earnestly 
he had entered upon it, and how far he had proceed- 
ed, will be seen from those remnants of his lucubra- 
tions which compose the Second Part of this volume. 
We have there sufficiently explained how they come to 



I 



INTRODDCTORr. 



I 



I 



be now submitted to the public, imperfect and fragmen- 
tary OS they are. Little more on that subject need be 
added liere. With an amateur in letters so fastidious 
and luxurious as Charles Sharpe, the publication in 1816 
of Old Mortality, the author of which he could hardly 
feil at once to recognise, must have operated as a wet 
blanket upon his own design. Or, to use a loftier simile, 
it must have seemed to him as a comet blazing in the 
heavens, and warning him to withhold a presumptuous 
hand from the heroic mortal thus adopted in the world's 
eye by a Deus majorum gentium. Hia own researches 
were only beginning to assume the consistency of histo- 
rical biography, when that unexpected prodigy rushed 
into the field of view ; and it can scarcely be doubted 
that his perhaps wavering intentions on the subject, — 
an adventurous one in Scotland, — had received the coup 
de p-ace from the brilliant phenomenon to which all eyes 
were turned in 1816. 

Mr Sharpe, however, did not altogether abandon his 
literary labours in that direction ; and he never lost sight 
of the historic truth, in his own just appreciation of the 
comparative merits of Clavorhouse and his calumniators. 
So he lapsed into a very ingenious mode of having out 
bis own say in spite of " Old Mortality." The great 
value of bis original design, as exemplified in that early 
rough cast of it we have now printed, was, the authen- 
ticity and originality of the sources from which he drew 
his information, and bis illustrations. At that time the 
system of literary and antiquarian Clubs, afterwards 
greatly promoted by Mr Sharpe himself, did not prevail 
in Scotland. He had laboriously gathered the most part 
of his curious historical lore from various contemporary 
diaries and chronicles in manuscript, which of late years 
have been printed under the liberal auspices of such a^o- 



I 



I 



INTRODUCTORT. 



ciatioDS, but which were tbeii all but inaccessible'even 
to those most anxious to prosecute researches of the 
kind. But this literary amateur, a gentleman, the very 
antipodes of that theftuous animal a cheap bookseller's 
hack, and one whose social position gave him at once 
the open sesame to many an old cabinet, iron chest, and 
vaulted charter-room, — uniting, moreover, in a rare de- 
gree, the varied antiquarian lore of a Horace \\'alpole,' 
with the pink-eyed industry of Pope's " Wormius hight," 
— was neither to be daunted by the venom of intolerant 
fanaticism, nor deterred by the dust of mouldering ho- 
nour. There was no well so deep or dark that truth 
could escape hira ; and, sootJi to say, he shrank not from 
producing her without a fig-leaf. 

Two Scotch dominies, of the high covenanting straio, 
who would be pronounced crazy in these days, yclept 
respectively James Kirkton and Robert Law, had each 
left in manuscript certain rude chronicles, or annals, of 
wild fanaticism and wondrous superstition, which they 
intended to pass for history. These Clarendons of the 
Covenant, however, were in some respects far more ho- 
nest, and, as regards Law at least, more right-minded 
than the rack of their sect. The manuscript by Kirkton 
was entitled, " The Secret and True Hi.?tory of the 
Church of Scotland, from the Kestoration to the year 
1678." That by Law, " Memorials of the memorable 
things that fell out within this Island of Great Britain, 
from 1638 to 1684." Upon these amusing records, not 
altogether useles-a, but too grotesque to be otherwise than 
humiliating to history, — and certainly not a little da- 
maging to their own Kirk, — the antiquary of Hoddam 
laid his exploring hand, with a determination to do 



' Sir Wulwr SiMitt, iu hit corrcsponder 
Wslpole ofStotlnnd. 



;, cttlla Charles Sbarpe tbe Horacs 



INTBODCCrORy. 



Mr 



^^ ne 



Ibem ample editorial justice. He handled them, indeed, 
as if he loved them ; turned them into goodly printed 
quartos ; illustrated them with his own graphic pencil as 
well as pen ; anointed them with the very fatness of 
fimaticism ; surrounded them with a halo of covenanting 
■eal, curiously culled from the most unctuous sources ; 

ptized them history in the name of the Solemn League 
and Covenant, — and then left them very much in the 
condition of Punch's offspring after the parental embrace. 
Mr Sharpe's notes, illustrations, and additions to Kirk- 
ton'a History, edited in 1817 (the year after the appear- 
ance of " Old Mortality"), and to Law's Memorials, 
edited in 1818, enriched with recondite reading, authen- 
ticated with provoking accuracy, and spiced with the 
most racy wit and humour, under admirable discipline, 
inflicted a blow upon the pretensions of Wodrow'a " Suf- 
fering Remnant," which the saiutdom of Scotland can 
never recover, and which its modem subjects will never 

trgive. 

Nor in this cau it truly be said that injustice was done 
to those Scribes and Pharisees, or any disservice to reli- 
gion. When we consider the fiilse and turbulent pre- 
tensions of that sect to perfection in church discipline, 
and purity in Christian conduct, their ferocious intole- 
rance of ail that elevates humanity, whenever such hap- 
pened to oppose their doctrines, or frustrate their de- 
signs, it seems a positive duty to disabuse the public 
mind, which they systematically laboured to poison with 
recklefls assertion and unmitigated invective. A coarse, 
but intensely pn)Voked exposure, in their own times, of 
the conventicle eloquence of the apostles of the Cove- 
[luint, proving out of their own mouths the low standard 
^oT their int«llect«, and the debased quality of their minds, 
IMiulfi like the exoggeration of a malevolent opponent, 



I 



XU INTUODUCTORT. 

and has by some been condemned as a too naked display, 
even if true, of that lamentable desecration of the holy 
office. But the more closely the matter is examined, 
the truth of this retributive attack becomes the more 
apparent, and the publication of it the less objectionable. 
" The pamphlet," says Mr Sharpe in his notes, " which 
seems to have enraged Kirkton so much, is written on 
the plan of ' L'Estrange's Dissenters' Sayings," and was 
published under this title, — ' The Scotch Presbyterian' 
Eloquence ; or the foolishness of their teaching discovered 
from their books, sermons, and pmyers,' &c. Kirkton's 
own flowers of eloquence, preserved there, are generally 
too indecent for transcription : he, moreover, is termed 
the everlasting comedian of the party, and accused of 
extreme covetousness. The pamphlet itself, which has 
gone through a number of editions, is blameworthy, aa 
preserving a multitude of profane expressions uttered by 
foolish or ignorant Presbyterian clergymen, to the scan- 
dal of any church ; but that these expressions have been 
exaggerated, as the Covenanters pretend, there is no 
reason to believe : nay, extracts could be made, from 
sermons still extant, both in print and in MS., almost 
equally gross and abomuiable with those which disgrace 
the pages of the Scotch Presbyterian Eloquence."' 

But if, in that title, instead of the national term 
" Presbyterian,"— a term, as now understood, to be 
treated with every respect, — the word " Conventicle," or 
" Covenanting," be substituted, (words unhallowed in the 
vocabulary of Christianity), what is there blameworthy 
in the exposure of rampant falsehood by outraged truth ? 

' The tcnn " Preabvlciian," wiis tlien iinJcrsIoud in u very different »ensi- 
rroro whnC it U now. 

' Kirkton's Hutor>', i.. 194.— Kariewed by Sir Walter Srott, in the l^iiar- 
l«rly Review for Jiniinry 1818, Vol, xviii. No. 36. 



INTRODUCrOKT. XUl 

f Nor, whatever may be acted at " Heaven's gate," by 

' Sterne's sentimental seraphs, can any sufficient reason 

be given, wby the craziaess, the calumnies, and the 

crimes, of those rebellious zealots of the Scotch Cove- 

^^ nant, should be treated on earth with the tenderness 

^^b Uiat, as we are afsured, dispoeed for ever of Uncle Toby's 

^Boath. 

Sir Walter Scott immediately reviewed his friend's 
publication of Kirkton's History, over which he had 
chuckled with an inward delight scarcely concealed in 
his clever but as usual somewhat temporising critique. 
" Mr Kirkpatrick Sharpe," be says, " though residing in 

I the land of Presbytery, is an Episcopalian and a tory, or 
rather an old cavalier, with much of the respect for high 
femily, contempt of the Covenanters, and disUke of de- 
mocratlcal principles, proper to that designation. Of 
coui^e he has not escaped the censure of those industri- 
ous literary gentlemen of opposite principles, who have 
suffered a work always reUed upon as one of their chief 
authorities, to lie dormant for a hundred and forty years, 
and are now mortified that it should be published by a 
person of opposite opinions in politics and church govern- 
ment, as if he bad usurped an office to which they had 
an exclusive title. We cannot listen to these querulous 
outcries, unless they allege, which would be most ffroimd- 
Uss, that the work had suffered through the infidelity of 
the editor. In every point of view, wo conceive that 
Kirkton's History has received, from the liveliness of 
Mr Sliarpe's illustrations, upon a subject which is some- 
times uncommonly dull,' from the art with which he 

' Ur M'Crie ounot be so complimented, for bii attempts to enliTen 

B dpgnintic^ higutrj with which be lUMilcd Sir Wnltor. Affecting to 

ere Scotch antiquary, ho eiprcnes lurpriau that his novels 

nld ba " popular in En^and, where we are pennaded Dot one word io 

is underMood liy the generality of ruaders." By way of extracting flin 






I 

i 



JQV INTRODOCrORT. 

has contrasted the same facts as told by different people, 
and illustrated heavy details by interesting examples or 
comments, a value which, edited by some great admirer 
and worshipper of his own system, it would never have 
attained." 



Mr Sharpe it was, who, delighted with the success of 
our own researches illustrative of the great Montrose, 
chiefly impelled us to the labour of ministering in Uke 
manner to the offended manes of Dundee. But the ar- 
dour with which we entertained a proposition so flatter- 
ing, from such a quarter, was sadly damped by his un- 
timely death soon thereafter. He also first suggested 
the probability, that, in the archives of the dukedom of 
Queensberry, might be discovered valuable illustrations 
of that period of history in which Dundee is so promi- 
nent a figure, and perhaps letters from the bete noir him- 
self. Accordingly, an application in the proper quarter 
was met by that frankness of acquiescence, and that in- 
telligent sympathy in all worthy objects, which so emi- 
nently characterise the present inheritor of those ducal 
archives. The discovery of thiiiij-sescn important let- 
ters, all in the handwriting of Graham of Claverhouse, 
and addressed to the first Duke of Queensberry, through- 
out of Ihia idea, when quoting " Old Morlnlity,'' he givea the referencca in 
mock Scotch, thuB : " Cuddy Hcndrigg, too, very wittily observes that this 
in big opinion formed the only diflerence between the Epiacopaliin service 
and that of their opponents : Saame volume, aeiainl chapter, bander aiC Ji/iy- 
aaxtpagt." So delighted a the Doctor with tbia bis owd elephantine frolic, 
that he actually repeats it three times in the course of a page ! '' He always 
read on the anme prayer-liooi with her," &o. " See the taorae neeund volame, 
tiral/ chapter, and there Ihe three huitder-third and three hiindcr-JoKrlh pages." 
And once more : " A circumstance which so enraged hia murderers," &c. 
" Volume Ike /ourl}i,auchti/-ihird and auehis-foarlh pages." In thus attempt- 
ing to make a fbol of Sir Walter Scott, it may be fairly doubted whether the 
Doctor was not rather making a fool of some one else. Upon the truth of 
Wodrow'B rubbish hia attack entirely depends. 



INTRODCCTORT. 



out a series of years immediately preceding the Revolu- 
tion of 1GS8, — the existence of which was hitherto ab- 
solutely unknown to history and the public, — was the 
immediate result of the search so liberally permitted. 
^^ It must be stated, however, that this most valuable re- 
^H pertory of the best kind of materials for domestic history, 
^^H amounting to several thousands of documents, had some 
years before been carefully inspected hy the present 
Duke himself. Under his Grace's own direction, these 
had been most accurately arranged, and beautifully pre- 
served, in a series of many folio volumes, bound and 
lettered, — a praiseworthy care which has saved the 
documents, and greatly lightened the labour of cousult- 
ing them. 

Besides theee letters from Claverhouse, the no lees 
voluminous correspondence of all his great compatriots, 
the leading statesmen of the day, had in like manner 

■ been placed in hi.<» private repositories by the first Duke 
<rf Queensberry, who appears to have systematically, and 
■▼my properly, disobeyed the oft-repeated instructions of 
hia distinguished correspondents, — " be sure to bum this 
letter." 

tSuch are the principal materials which have so fortu- 
nately become available for the present undertaking, at 
the instigation chiefly of Mr Sharpe, the result of which 
it was fated he should not survive to see. And hence it 
ia that this work has assumed the form of illustrative 
Memorials and Letters, requiring the extended limits of 
two volumes, — even that by no means sullieing to lay 
before the public all that could be produced, from the 
Queensberry collection, to amuse and to inform the 
readers of history. It is particularly redolent of that 
species of domestic as well as pubUc history in which the 

1^ 



1 



INTRODUCTORY. 



Providence to spare him, probably these volume would 
have been enriched by the clever and caustic quaintness 
of his pencil, as well as of his pen. In his use of the 
former, indeed, he more especially displayed the man of 
" infinite jest and most excellent fancy ; " and no work 
of the kind could be more attractive, than a complete 
and properly illustrated collection and reprint, of the 
many witty conceits, quaint devices, and happy fancies, 
which flowed so easily from his pencil, in decorating any 
work that he considered worthy of such aid. Lockhart 
tells us, that " Scott's acquaintance with Mr Sharpe be- 
gan when the latter was very young. He supplied Scott, 
when compiling the Minstrelsy, with the ballad of the 
' Tower of Repentance.' " Nor has Sir Walter's bio- 
grapher failed to record that gem of Mr Sharpe's histori- 
cal pencil, " a drawing of Queen Elizabeth, as seen 
' dancing high and disposedly,' in her private chamber, 
by the Scotch ambassador Sir James Melville, whose de- 
scription of the exhibition is one of the most amusing 
things in his Memoirs. This production of Mr Sharpe's 
pencil, and the delight with which Scott used to expati- 
ate on its merits, must be well remembered by every one 
that ever visited the poet at Abbotsford."* 

' Life, by Lockhart. Sir Walter conveyed hia tlianks ia a letter n 
tbuB comnipnces : — " My deur Sharpe : The immilabU pirago came safe, and 
was nelcomed by the iaextinguisbable laughter of all nho looked upon her 
caprioles. I waa mifortunately out of town for a few days, which preTonted 
me from acknowledging instantly what gave me so muth pleasure, both oi 
account of its iDtriusic value, and as a mark of your kind remembrance." 
An admirable subject for Sharpe's humorous powers in thia graphic walk, 
would have been a scene of which he himself was the hero. Sir Walter 
mentions in bis Diary (March 1829), that be and his daughter, accompanied 
by Charles Sharpe, " went about one o'clock to the Caatlc, where saw 
auld murdress Moai Meg, brought up in solemn procession to rc-occupy her 
ancient place on the Argyle battery," &c. " My daughter had what might 
have proved a frightful accident. Some rockets were let olT, one of which 
lighted upon her head, and set her bonnet on fire. She neither screamed 



I 



INTRODUCTORV. XVll 

That friends so iutiiuate, and so congenial in their 
Kterary taefes and habits, as Sir Walter Scott and Mr 
Sharpe, should between them have still left the chai-acter 
of great Dundee a prey to Dr M'Crie and the Covenant, 
is much to be regretted. But so it was. The " Great 
Unknown" had entered a field of fame which he coul<l 
not afford to sacrifice, by hunting facts in the jungles of 
history ; and so, whatever he might suspect, he never 
got at the real character of Claverhouse. Mr Sharpe, on 
the other hand, damled like the rest of the world by the 
fascinating romance, gave up the subject in despair, not 
of the character of Dundee, but of the attention or sym- 
pathy of the public. This is the more to be regretted, 
that his researches were all in the right direction, and 
banning to be crowned with great success. I'rior to 
1826, ten years after the publication of Old Mortality, 
not a letter from the pen of Claverhouse himself v.'&s 
known to exist, or at least had appeared. Sir Walter 

W^Bf f^t^ but quietly permitlod Charles Sharpe to cxtinguiah llio 6r», vrhit^U 

Vae did with great coolneaa ami clexterity." 

Upon Sir Walter's quilting liaine in 1831, Lockhnrt uciilionB, that 
" He does not seem to have written many fnrewcU letters ; but there is one 
to * very old friend, Mr Kirkpatrick Sharpe." The letter thus patheticnlly 
concludes : — " My dear Charles," &c., " 1 should like to have shaken handu 
with you, as there are few I regret so much to part with. But it may nut 
be. I will keep my nyea dry if possible, and ihercfore content myself with 
bidding you a long, — )ierhaps an otemal, — farewell. But I may dnd my way 
home again, improved aa a Dutch skipper from a whale fbhhig. I am \&ry 
happy that I am like to see Malta. Always yours, well or ill, Walteii 
SctiTT." 

Sir Wtdtcr also thu« ileftcribes hlni in his diary, Nov. 182&: — " Charles 
Kirkjiatrick Sharpe," he saj-s, " is another very remarkable tOBU. He was 
bred a durgyinan, but never took orders. He has infinite wtt, and a great 
turn for atitiijuarian lore, as the publications of Kirlcton, &t-. benr witneM. 
His drawings are the most fanciful and droll imaginable — a mixture botweuii 
Uogarth and some of those foreign moBters who painted temptations of St, 
Anthony, and such grotcMjue mbjects," Etc. " My idea is, that Charlea Kirk- 
Sharpe, with hu oddities, tastes, satjre, and high aristocmtic leelings, 
ibles Horace Wolpok' ; jierhaps in his person alw, in a general wny." 



Hfitnck 



XVin INTEODUCTOKV. 

wrote of him in total ignorance of his epistolary powers 
and habits ; and little knowing thatj from tlie family 
archives of Scotland, could be cnlled enough to constitute 
what may be called the Despatches of Dundee. Un- 
heard of, in garrets and charter -chests, lay hidden the 
true characteristics of the warrior and the statesman, 
whom romance and polemical religion, fancy and fanati- 
cism, had divided between them. Some of these scattered 
letters, indeed, had been recovered by Mr Sharpe, but so 
late OS not even to have entered those fragments of his 
Memoirs of the hero which we have given in this volume. 
The Claverhouse of Old Mortality being in the ascen- 
dant, those precious documents were transferred by Mr 
Sharpe, doubtless mnllum gemens, to his friend Mr George 
Sraythe of Methven, as an antiquarian offering to the 
Bannatyne Club. That contribution, forming a thin 
quarto volume, beautifully printed, appropriately deco- 
rated by the pencil of Mr Sharpe himself, and accu- 
rately illustrated with explanatory notes by Mr Smythe, 
was presented to the Club in 1826, under the title,— 
" Letters of John Grahame of Claverhouse, Viscount of 
Dundee, with illustrative documents." But Mr Smythe 
did not attempt to redeem the character of Dundee, or 
to connect those letters with his biography, or his public 
career. Inscribed as they were to an antiquarian so- 
ciety, the original orthography (at that period very 
loose) wafl preserved throughout ; a fact not to be criti- 
cised under the circumstances, but which renders the 
letters so repulsive to the modem eye, and so confound- 
ing to the sense, that to study the man therein, is like 
looking for the face of Yorick in his skull. Hence, little 
or no use, either biographical or historical, has ever been 
made of this collection, which will be found in readable 
orthography, along with his other despatches, in our 



INTRODUCTTOKY. 



I 



L 



Second Volume. And as for Sir Walter, having ex- 
hausted, after his kind, the subject of Claverhouse before 
they appeared, he has manifested little inclination even 
to recognise the existence of such original materials. 
Now, however, that to the set of letters edited by Mr 
Smythe, most of which are addressed to the Earl of Lin- 
lithgow, as Commander-in-chief of the forces in Scot- 
land, we are enabled to add thirty-seven written by 
Claverhouse to the Prime Minister for Scotland, we have 
ample materials for judging the man by a truer test than 
the fanaticism of a Wodrow, the fancy of a Scott, or the 
ferocity of a Macaulay. 

This result of our researches in defence of Claverhouse, 
and illustrative of his Life and Times, we have divided 
into four parts. The volume at present issued consists 
of two parts. The first is intended to clear the way, by 
the removal of that superincumbent load of mistaken 
history, and vulgar error, which had really placed 
Graham of Claverhouse under the category of historical 
myths. Public opinion on the subject required a regu- 
lar siege, and we have laid our approaches accordingly. 
In this review, we have bestowed upon previous histo- 
rians a measure of respect, as regards the subject of 
" Bloody Clavers," in proportion to the justice which 
they have bestowed upon him. The second part is 
composed of the fragmentary manuscripts of Mr Sharpe, 
supplemented by our own acquisitions chiefly from the 
Queensberry Papers. As this volume contains proofs 
and illustrations of the real character of great Dundee, 
BufiBcient to destroy that mythical representation of him 
which has hitherto kept the field, we have not hesitated 
to submit it at once, to the judgment of the candid 
reader, the correction of the occompli-shed critic, and the 



INTRODUCTORY. 



plunder of the literary hack. To this last, however, we 
recommend forbearance, until the labours of our second 
volume be also within his reach. That volume will in 
like manner consist of two parts. The first (third of the 
work) will comprehend the correspondence of Claver- 
house so far as discovered ; and which already amounts 
to what may be termed his despatches. In this, the 
hero shall chiefly speak for himself. In the last part, 
we shall view him isolated and doomed, like his great 
prototype Montrose ; separated from bis former corres- 
pondents and compatriots ; firm of purpose, lofty in 
spirit, high in heart a.s ever ; and, finally, under the 
most desperate circumstances, consistent in his principles, 
devoted in bis loyalty, and glorious in his death. 

The whole work is intended to form a pendant or 
sequel to our Memoirs of Montrose;' and its graphic 
decorations are of the same character and amount. As 
in the former work, each volume of the present will con- 
tain two different portraits of our hero, all well authen- 
ticated, but somewhat varying in style and expression. 
To clear the character of Dundee was a natural and 
necessary sequel to having cleared the character of 
Montrose. Their calumniated characters are founded 
upon the same great lie of two centuries ; and our work 
would have been but half finished, had we suffered it to 
rest upon the redemption, from such slanders, of the 
head of the house of Graham. 

As regards Montrose, since the publication of our 
voluminous discoveries of original matter, blograjihical 
and historical, at different times, and from various latent 
sources, illustrative of his whole career from his cradle 
to his grave, the tide even of popular opinion has turned 



' Memoirs of iho Marquis of Montrose, I61S-1 
G. Stevenson, Edinburgh, 185G. 



iO, 2 Tols. 8to ; Tbomas 



INTRODUCTORY. XXI 

trongly in his favour. We hear no more, and never 
hear agaiu, such flaming historical fiats launched 
against him, as this by Malcolm Laing, — that, " Mon- 
trose was destitute of humanity ;" that, " Montrose was 
ignorant of what was due to civilized society;" that, 
" the awa45iHn;/o« of Argyle and Hamilton was charac- 
ieristical of Montrose ;" or those yet more excited de- 
nunciations, even by the Historiographer Roj-al for 
[ Scotland, — that, " Detected in his wickedness, and utterly 
' cast off by the whole body (of Covenanters) as hloated 
with iniqtiitij, there was no scheme so desperate that he 
(Montrose) hesitated to recommend, none so wicked 
that he declined to execute." Before our researches 
I commenced, no one ventured to contradict these anathe- 
t^mas, and covenanting calumny kept the field. Now, 
men who once pinned even their religioux faith to them, 
are ashamed to remember such passages in history. 
And what is more, so vastly has he risen, under our 
I auspices, in public estimation, that the merchants of 
f letters begin to think him marketable in England. Those 
[ great promoters of the growing art of authorship made 
I eai*y, the Messrs Routledge and Co. of London, have 
1 very recently honoured Montrose with their especial 
[ patronage, to the utter exclusion of his proper bio- 
I grapher, and latest publisher. Finding the character of 
I the Scotch hero redeemed to their baud, and liis com- 
I plicated story thoroughly evolved, through most interest- 
L ing and original materials, — the family papers of various 
I noblemen and gentlemen, only accessible to them, or to 
I tbcir hocks, through our own publications, — they sud- 
I denly announce themselves in 1858, (in the face of Mr 
I' Stevenson's publication of 1856 still in the market, and 
I without a word of communication with the author of 
I fmtr fditiims of the biography of Montrose, l)etweeu 1838 



INTRODUCTORY. 



and 1856, each productive of newly discovered materials 
from private sources,} ' as the vendors of the only true 

' Fhil: In 1838, was published in l-ondon and Edinburgh,— 
" MoDtrose and ihe Covenanters, their Churaoters and Conduct, illastrat«d 
from prirate letters and other original douumenU hitherto unpubliihed, em- 
bncing the Times of Charles the Firat, frotu the riae of the Troubles in 
Scotland, to the death of Montrose. By Mark Napier, Esq., Advocate. 
LiOndoD : James Duncan, 37 Paternoster Row, 1838." Two colames octavo: 
Secnnd: In 1840, was published, in Edinburgh and London, — 
" The Life and Times of Alontrose, Illustrated trom Original Monuseripts, 
including family papers now first published, from the Montrose Charter- 
chest, and other private Repositories. By Mark Napier, Esq., Advocate. 
With Portruts and Autographs. Edinborgh : Oliver and Boyd, and Simpkin, 
Marshall, and Co., London, 1810." One volume, small aciavti : 

Third: Lord Mahon having revjeweii these works in the Quarterly 
Beview for December 1846, John Murray of London republished that com- 
plete and elegant extraii of our volumes, in the collected edition of " His- 
torical Essays by Lord Mohon," in 1849, containing this imprimatur by that 
accomplished nobleman, — 

" With s. just admiration for Montrose and the Scottish loyalists, Mr 
Napier has carefully and diligently sought out whatever could bear upon 
tbdr history. The appearance of his first work, ' Montrose and the Cove- 
nanters,' 163S, incited the deacendonts of the hero to a search, which they 
had strangely, during two centuries, postponed, into their own family charter- 
chest, — a search which has brought to light, for the first time, several im- 
portant original letters to Montrose, especially from Kings Charles the First 
and Second. Under these circumstances, which tniglit have mortiSed an 
ordinary scribbler, Mr Napier was f:ir from echoing the reply of the French 
Abb^ and would-be historian, who, when offered some curious MS. notes of 
the Governor of a fortress, answered drily, ' Mnn tie'ge etl fuitP Mr Napier, 
on the contrary, in an excellent spirit, and with most commendable teal, aat 
down to re-write hia book by the aid of his fresh mateinals. The new work 
was published in 1840, with the title, ' The Life and Times of Montrose,' but 
compressed into o single volume, and omitting not a few of the documents 
and extracts to be found in the former. Both works are therefore necessary 
to a full understanding of the subject, and it is from both ("not neglecting 
olher helps), that we propose tci draw what we hope may not prove unwel- 
come to our readers, — a sketch of the career and character of Tns Great 
MAR<jt;m OF MoNTitose, ne to this day in Scotland the hero continues t« be 

Fourth: Subsequently lo Lard Mahon's historical essay, appeared, — 
" Memorials of Montrose and hia Times ; Edinburgh : Printed for the 
Maitland Club r In ticn rolumes qnario, — which volumes were issued, succes- 
sively, in 1848, and 1860; and contained Inng and elaboratelg compoted 



I 



I 



TNTRODUCTOHY. XXIU 

article, hanging out this alluring bush to bring custom 
to smuggled spirits and adulterated wine : — 

" The object of tlie following work," Bay Messrs Routledge, 
" is to illtistrate the Mihtary History of Scotland during the 
desjwrat© struggle between the King and the Covenanters ; 
I thus, in Bome degree, it may bo deemed a compromise between 
' history and biograpliy, as well as a tribute to Scottish valour 
in days now happily jiassed away. The story of a soldier's 
life is always one of excitement, and the biography of a hero 
seldom fails to instruct. Between the jmblicatiou of Bish&p 
Wisharl's tvork and the ample quartos of l/te Maitland Club," 
[1848-50]' " many memoirs of Montrose have appeared, but 
none that were much known, especially in England, or were 
within the reach of the million ; and the Puhlishei's believe 
Wiat, /or the first time, they are enabled to bring forward a 
jOqpular and complete military history of lite great Cavalier, and 
^ the wars of his time. Around him are grouped the principal 
Scottish statesmen and soldiers who were his cotemporaries ; 
thus the narrative is made the means of depicting something 
of the inner life, the manners, and habits of thought, which 
characterised the Scots of the seventeenth century ; while 
nothing that Bcoma a fault on either side, in Covenanter or 
Cav&lior, bas been concealed, in the detail of that civil strife to 
which the savage precepts of adverse preachers imparted a 
horror so sanguinary." 
" GmiiBusoH, Fdi. IBSB."' 

biogr&phii^i and historical Introdactions and Appendices, HigntMl by Ibe 

snthor and editor ■ Makk NAPiBKj'Had tbc eo;j^-ri>7Af of which remain hi^ 

tindi(put43il property. From Iheso eompatition*. Grant bos lurxely plundered. 

F^/lh: In 1850, was publiiUud, in EiJiobur(;h and London, — 

" Memoirs of the Afanjuis of Munlroio. By Mark Napier. Edinburgh ; 

Tbotna* G. Stevunsou, 87 rrincos Slnwt. London: tlamilton, Adaioi, and 

[ Co., 186U." Tu-o volume* oelaeo. 

> Hut, Napier's Montro«e of 1856, the moat coiupUle LiPj of Mcmlroae, is 
bere excluded entirely, in this Grout- RoiUltdge profaco dati-d in 1868! 
Cauta palel. Affoin, all alluiion to tho author of four b!ogri>)>l>ii» of Mou- 
Iroao between 1S38 and 1866, is brrc avoided. Causa paUt. From the 
"forefront of Grant's preface" (a« Vice'Cbancullor Wood phrased it) to the 
iM betk of tb« volume, thi' finimut furandi \t manifest, ns me shfltl dvinoii- 
MnU ebewhi-re. 



XXIV INTRODDCTORT. 

We have here quoted the entire preface to the volume 
in question. The anomaly of the London pubUshers' 
preface heing dated in Edmburgh, is explained by the 
fact, that it was composed there, for thera, by Grant, 
but expressly adopted by those publishers, and put forth 
in their oicn name. We would be too happy to think 
it possible that that publishing firm was entirely ignorant 
of the true character of their mercantile acquisition, — 
a mongrel manuscript, namely, creeping out of Scot- 
land ; and, without leave asked or given, — disingenuously 
made up of the unacknowledged labours, and discoveries, 
of the prior biographer of Montrose, curtailed by the 
blundering scissors of an Edinburgh celt (with a nimble 
pen for claymore), wlio never made a discovery about 
Montrose in his life ; never obtained admittance to a 
noblemen's charter-room on the subject ; who has 
"grouped" no contemporary statesmen and soldiers 
around the hero that we hod not groupeil before him ; 
who has "depicted" nothing "of the inner life, the 
manners, and habits of thought which characterised the 
Scota of the seventeenth century" that he did not find 
in our volumes more fully illustrated and depicted to hia 
hand ; and who, even in those piratical, and parrotieal, 
wares, purchased and pubhshed by the Messrs Routledge, 
has shown himself so ignorant of the illustrious subject he 
therein desecrates with a borrowed and bastard enthu- 
Biasm, as to adopt the occasional blunders of the real bio- 
grapher, (along with what he must have deemed beanlies- 
gince he appropriated them) ; a-s not to know the latin 
title-page of Dr Wishart's AA'^ars of Montrose when he sees 
it ; and aa to imagine, when he happens to meet with the 
name of General Kiiuf in the volumes he violates, that 
this must mean Kiiii) Charles ! A work moreover, which, 
stamped with such general characteristics as these, has, 



INTRODUCTOHr. 



notwithstanding its pretentions nd capfandnm preface, not 
added to our own labours one microscopic grain of infor- 
mation, or of interest, touching Montrose !^ 

Had we, Hke Mr Smythe of Methven, simply edited 
a fragmentary collection of historical letters, or other 
private documents, with a few illustrative notes, whether 
presented to an antiquarian club or to the public, those 
materials, for hit-lory or biography, might have been open 
to the trashy adaptation of a Grant, or the trading 
activity of a Routledge. But surely the laborious literary 
compoBitions, not to apeak of discoveries, of the mere 
amateur in authorship ia entitled to the same moral pro- 
tection (rarely indeed so grossly outraged), of gentle- 
manly feeling, and generous dealing, in letters, — and to 
the same legal protection of the law of copy-right in 
equity, — as the compositions of any professional author 
who may happen to be dependent upon that species of 
work for his bread ? And the long series of our own 
notorious publicatioiis, so absolutely exhaustive of the 
previously unknown biography of Montrose, — natal, 
educational, matrimonial, domestic, historical, political, 
military, and obituary, — from his cradle to his grave, — 
published successively between 1838 and 1856, surely 
places the O'ranf-Itoittledi/e preface, of 1858, and the 
whole of Grant's performance, in a light so little favour- 
able, as to make it diHicult to conceive, — if a profes- 
sional author be a gentleman, or a publishing firm an 
entity, — how either autbor or pubUsher could bear to 
look upon their bantling twice. To wait till the fruit 
was exuberant and ripe, and then to rob the orchard, 
was a Celtic feat, scarcely to be rendered famous by 

ir particular DKampliw ol'tlieac choractcriellci of ihu Motnoire ofSIon- 
I troto bj Jkiqm Granl, publiilivil hy llie Mcmh lioutlcdge of London, 1858, 
e lit the pnil "fthif j.refilf... 



INTRODUCTORY. 



the fact, that the plunder Ibund a dealer in London not 
afraid to retail it. ' 



■ The hislory of our unsuccessful uttcmpt to arreet this speculation in tlio 
lianda of the London publishers, by obtaining an injimotion from Chnncety 
(a auit inetitutod chiefl)' for the sake of our oivn publisher, who liod taken upon 
himself llie whole risk of an expensive work, thus attempted to be uaderaold 
ID London,) and the precite value, to Jav, equity, and letters, of Vice- 
chancellor Page Wood's judgment In Re, Napier v. Roulledge and Co., 
must be the subject of full illustration in another form. Here, however, 
we may give the Messrs RouUcdf^e the benefit of repcatbg one of their own 
adfertisementa of " Grant's Life of Montrose :" — 

" Mr Marie Napier baving decided not to proceed with his motion to re- 
strain the publication of this work, the public is informed that it la now on 
sale, and maj be had through any bookseller, Mr Napier's anxiety to pre- 
vent its publication, U gufficieiit evidence of its high literary merit" ! 

Wo feel the less difficulty in commentbg ai we have done upon Mr Grant's 
work, seeing that his publishers consider our hostility as " suOicieiit evidence 
of its high literary merit." They also parade, in another of their advertise- 
mentfl, the following puff, from " Bell's Messenger ;" — 

" We congratulate Mr Grant upon this volume, which is, certainly, the 
most successful of his many sui-ccssful publications, and irill enhance hit 
lileran/ reputation far and wide" ! 

We are doing our best to realize, for the Messrs Routledge, this brilliant 
antidpation of their sanguine " Messenger." Meanwhile, their author ie 
scarcely yet entitled to say to Montrose, " I've made thee glorious by my 
pen." So far as Chancery is concerned, the Routledges may now indeed 
hollo, having got so well out of the wood ; but the page of Grant's honours 
is rather a grinning one. Vico- Chancellor Wood, (whose judgment shall 
be elsewhere critically analysed), at the conclusion of his judgment refusing 
the injunction with costs, observed, — " He should have been glad to see 
fiilt and AattdMme acknowledgment of the plaintiff's labours ; but though d< 
put in the fore front of Grant's preface," — [nay, Sir Page, such acknowledge- 
ment is utterly ezcUided, and with an obvious animus, from Grant's ] 
face; — and, moreover, that preface is adopted by the Routledges as ( 
oicn,] — " or svfficiently ample, tome acknowledgment there was" I Where, 
and of what kind? There is not a notice in Grant's whole volume, of Iha prior 
author from whom lie was eonreyiny trholesale, that does not in itself afford 
distinct evidence of the ani'nius_/uran(/i. *' Then," continued the Vice-Chan- 
cellor, " upon the question of costs, if Mr Grant bad been the only defend- 
ant, ht might have paused." — Times Nea-spaper Report, 19th Jan. 1859. 
Grant's name was necessarily introduced in the case ; but he was not a de- 
fendant at all, being without the jurisdiction. 

It is amusing to contrast with all this, the rritirat judgment, of one uf the 



INTRODUCTORY. XXVU 

Gentle reader, this is an episode. But the cause of 
the geoeroua professioQ of letters, and the patrimonial 
interests of an honest, and perhaps too enterprizing, 
Edinburgh publisher, seemed to call for it at our hands. 
Never having made, or striven to make, or expecting to 
make, a single pound Scots by our labours of love in the 
cause of Montrose,' but content to leave all to our seve- 
ral publishersj^including the risk, — we certainly felt as 

most indep«iKleiit and tmbiassed of all the orgnns of literary and critical 
jndgmeQt in LcdiIod. Tbo Athehmuk at once, and spontaaeooBly, faBleaed 
npoD Grant with a close and most damagiitg det«ction. We cannot liere go 
into all its details, but may quote the following : — 

" We wish (amimiiig that such a book as Mr Grant's was inevitable), that 
when he iroi helping himself to Mr Napier'i) material, bo bad done it wisely. 
He proves conclusively that he bos no research, by adopting errors from the 
evber books of Mr Napier which that gentleman has corrected from further 
discoveries in hia latest editions of the ' Memoirs.' When an author is 
pillaging another author's book, he may as well do it lagaciousty. An Irish 
landlord, in one of Lever's novels, shears bis sheep in Ibo winter time — a more 
pnident man waits till their fleeces are full grown. We can scarcely imagine 
vhat excuie will be made for the kind of proceedings which it has been our 
duty to expose. Mr Grant's book is not to cheap after all ; for we very 
much ^r that few of tbe ' million' can afford six shillings for a Onrd-rale 
biography. It is Dot better written iban the work which it ignores and 
afftctt to tupertede. It is not more popular in its views ; for Mr Grant is an 
ool-and-out * Cavalier,' and his pages overflow with a ruaudlin Gaelic 
patriolitm, which we can only liken to txcetdiagln weal: and tmoky tchitky- 
and'tDdtrr. We do not feel called upon to discuss Montrose's career ft pro- 
ptM of sncb a publication ; and, indeed, should scarcely have noticed it at all, 
if it did not involve considcratious of the right and wrong, of the moraU and 
eourletiei, of the literary profession, and the publishing trade.'" — The 
ATHC!(£t;u, March 20, 1658. 

' It is hardly an exception (as regorils tbc profits of authorship) to this 
&ct, that the Muitlond Club very liberally, but pcr/eellg gratuitously, pre- 
•ented to the author of " Memorials of Montrose and his Times," a hand- 
•oine acknowledgment (of their sense of the service done to their system, by 
those historical and biographical memoirs), in tbo shape of an honorarivm, 
intended, doubtless, to be expended, as tbe Antiquary would have said, in 
ptrptluam memoriam, upon a Petronian wine-goblet, — '• camellam vini." 
having purchased the gobUl; but we did not fail to expend 



., , " ■ DUUIOB I 

b^^H it upon the u 



d 



INTRODUCTORY. 



iiidigaant as Montrose himself would have doue, tbat the 
golden nuggets should in this covert manner be coined out 
of om- Idfourx and our discoveries, by the Grants and the 
Routledges of letters. Nor are we at all deterred from 
these views of our own case, by what we shall elsewhere 
endeavour to prove a somewhat questloniible judgment, 
from a high quarter, the tendency of which, we think, is 
to render copyright property as nneasi/ by Chancery law, 
as historical biography has been made caxi/ by Scotch 
conveyancing- And, gentle author, trust the law of copy- 
right, as you would trust a Will o' the wisp. Rather put 
your faith in Princes, than your reliance upon any pro- 
tection to be obtained, either as concerns copyright or 
Chancery costs (no joke, let me wani ye), even from this 
dictttm, — reported to have been delivered by Vice- 
Chancellor Sir Page Wood, himself, in the case of an 
alleged piracy of a Dictionary of Words! — 

" Copyright was considered, for the highest purposes 
of society, in every country, as necessary to be secured 
to those who contributed to the civilization, refinement, 
or instruction of mankind, and extended in this country, 
if not elsewhere, to ccerj/ descriptiim of work, however 
humble it might be, even to the mere collection of the 
abodes of persons, and to streets and places ; and labour 
hfiping been employed, upon subjects even of that class, no 
one had a right to avail himself of if "^ 



I 



Ere we pass on to Dundee, however, we must venti- 
late Montrose himself once more, (so as to redeem him 
from the contact of Messrs Grant and Koutledge), by the 
notice of some new illustrations, so recentl}' discovered 
as not to have fallen into marauding bands. 

' Seo \'icc-ChHnpcllor Sir Page Wood's jiiiigrapnt in Spins v. Brown, i 
fiortcd in the " Times" nowspnper, Fdi, 2G, EH58, 



^^1 a mere 



INTHODUCTORY. XXIS 

Wodrow tells ua, that the Marquis once tortured a 
covenanting minister, who refused the oath of allegiance, 
by attaching him to the stem of a boat, at the end of a 
rope, and dragging hini alternately under water, and to 
the surface, until the soul of the martyr was about to 
take its flight. This abominable falsehood we happened 
not to discover (festering as it is in the A}ialec(a of Wod- 
row) until after the publication of our latest edition of 
the Memoirs of Montrose, in 1850. It will be found 
thoroughly refuted In the historical review (p. 99,) which 
composas Part First of the present volume. But even 
BO recently as since the most of these pages had passed 
through the press, a new and very interesting testimony, 
to the heroic spirit, and truly Christian chaiTicter of 
Montrose, has emerged from its hybernation of two cen- 
turies, to stand in judgment against all his traduoers, — 
his pocket hilk; namely, bearing his autograph. At this 
moment we have before us the volume itself; the very 
bible, in all probabiHty, upon which be used to invoke the 
God of Battles, to strengthen his arm in the day of battle, 
and to temper it with mercy in the hour of victory. Had 
he been the monster recorded by those historians we have 
quoted before, Montrose would not have cherished the 
Book of Life, as his companion in the stormy path of his 
death-dealing career. But cherish it he did, as the little 
volume itself bears witness on more than one of its now 
stained and tattered leaves. The " Bible and the Broad- 
sword" ! Such is the desecrated insignia, so fantastically 
usurped by the Covenant, from the pages of a Wodrow 
to the panel of a Harvey. The Covenant ! which never 
reaped victory with the one, or read mercy in the other. 
It ia the proper insignia of Montrose, who never uttered 
a fanatical phrase, and never prompted or committed 
merciless act ; whose sword was the type of victory, 



XXS INTRODFCTORT. 

loyalty, and honour ; whose bible, the companion of his , 
6olitarv moments, was the book upon which he was wont ' 
to record the heroic and holy sentiments of a true and 
faithful champion of the Cross. The one now before us 
is a French bible in duodecimo, printed at Sedan, near 
Paris, in 1633, the year when Charles the First was i 
croivned in Scotland. It is quite suited for the pocket ; I 
and the print is very clear and small. In later days it 
had fallen into careless keeping. The New Testament, and 
the concluding portion of the volume, have been gnawed 
to pieces by rats or mice. The features of Montrose's 
illustrious chaplain, Dr \A''ishart, were in like manner 
disfigured by fanatical rats in " Haddo's Hole." The Old 
Testament, however, and the commencement of the 
volume, including the title page, and the fly-leaf before 
it, have escaped destruction. On either side of tliat 
leaf, and also on the title-page, appears the handwrit- 
ing of Montrose. 

1. On the first side of the leaf he had written the 
following couplet in Italian, — 

La vitd patsa, la morte viene, 
Bealo colvi clii haurafatto bene, — 

that is, — Life passes, death comes ; blessed is he who 
shall have done well. Immediately under this religious 
eentiment, he had traced the heroic one in Latin, — 
Honor jiiihi vita potior, — expressing that his honour was 
dearer to hira than his life- To this he adds bis signa- 
ture, written in a large bold hand as usual. Two other 
lines of his writing follow on the same page, to which his 
signature is again attached. The lines have been scored 
out, (seemingly by himself) but can he read as follows, 
the first being in Italian, the other in Latin : — Ardiio e 
Presto, — Courageous and Prompt ; and, — Aut solvam aut 



LA BIBLE, 

<IVI ilT 

TOVTB LA SAINCTE 

BSORITTKB DT TIBIL BT 

ITOTTKAT rftAMMUT. 



L'ANCIBNNE BT LA. 

HOVTlLtB AILIAVCI. 
C« mt nmm &^ inflrtfir Im Tmm 




■: 



INTRODUCTOBT. XXXI 

Urttam, — probably meaning, — If 1 can't untie the knot, 

I'll cut it. 

2, On the other side of the same lenf, at the top of 
it, the former Italian couplet is repeated in Montrose's 
handwriting, but scarcely visible, owing to the Ink hav- 
ing failed. Then follows an ingenious monogram of the 
initial of his title, sketched by himself, surrounded with 
a rude representation of roses, resting on what appears 
to be a shght indication of an eminence. All this is 
typical of the illustrious name, — in Latin, Mons rosarum. 
or Comes Moidisrosanim ; in English, Kosemount, or 
Montrose. This line, written immediately under the 
monogram, explains the design, — Non crescunt sine 
spilth, — refering to the roses, which do not grow with- 
out thorns ; and that which follows, — Pro jucundis 
aplissima fjueque [quieque] Deus dat, — may be read along 
with the former, to this effect : — Roses do not grow 
without thorns ; God gives whatever things are con- 
Tenient for us, instead of those things which delight us 
Beneath this moral and religious sentiment 
Appears another fine specimen of his noble signature. 

In the centre of the title-page is wiitten a well 
known line from Horace, — Si totus illabatur orUs, — a mis- 
quotation, by the way, indicating that he quoted from 
memorj', the word toim neither occurring in, nor fully 
expressing the original. The accurate quotation is, — 
Sifractus illabatur orbii, 
Impatidum ferient ruince. 

The pervading sentiment of that grandest of the odes of 
Horace is familiar to all : — The man whose constancy 
of resolution is based on virtue, will bear him fearlessly, 
even amid the descending ruin of the orb above. Then 
follows another sentiment in Latin, which has been scored 
oat, but may still be read, — Virhis omnia donal — which 



^K out, but 



INTROUL'CTORY. 



we would freely translate, — Virtue is ite own best re-' 
ward. To this also, Montrose has added his signature, 
divided by the woodcut in the ceatre of the page ; and 
beneath it, he iiad repeated, and again scored out, the 
words Aiit foirniii ant diruaiti. 

Of the three pages, the scribbUngs on which we have 
thus endeavoured to decypher, our readers are here pre- 
sented with most accurate facsimiles. There is nothing 
by which the date, or dates, of these characteristic notes 
can be precisely ascertained. The feeling seems too 
emphatic to be referred to the mere idleness of the most 
intelligent boyhood ; but in some of the monograms the 
combination with the letter E indicates that he waa 
only Earl at the time ; and, couecquently, that the writ- 
ing is'of some date prior to the battle of Tippermuir, his 
first great victory for the Crown, in the autumn of 1044. 
This, too, is remarkable, that that intense expression, of 
determined and devoted integrity, which he clothed in 
the well known quotation from Horace, reappears, in 
his handwriting, upon the title-page of another book, 
also at this moment before us. The following exact 
facsimile, will serve to show that this autograph, if not 
written at a riper age, was more carefully penned ; 
although the word lotuj is still substituted for Jrncfus. 



Zz- i-^^^^^, 



r/^ 



I 

i 



This fine and emphatic specimen of an illustrious 
autograph is displayed on the top margin of the engraved 



INTRODUCTORY. SXXlll 

' title-page of Camden's Britannia, the English folio 
edition of 1637, by Philemon Holland ; a volume as 
complete and stainless in its condition, as if it had been 
petted in the private lihrarj of a Thomas Thomson, or 
a Thomas Maitland. Tet, ecce signum, it had belonged, 
some two centuries ago, to that " bloody butcher" who 
overran Scotland with the emblems most fatal to 
libraries and letters, — fire and sword ; and its subsequent 
place of hiding (for the discovery of it is very recent), 
is the same wherein the mice had been suffered to make 
such havoc on the little bible. Tt is time to inform our 
readers where that b. 

David Drummond, Master of Maderty, who became 

I third Lord, was one of the earliest and of the most loyal 

I adherents of Montrose, in his great career of victory. 
At the battle of Tippermuir, being sent with a flag of 
truce to summon Perth in the name of Montrose and 
King Charles, he was instantly seized by the rebel Cove- 
nanters, and would have been put to death had they 
gained the battle. He hved, however, to be married to 
Lady Beatrix Graham, Montrose's youngest sister.' 
One of the possessions of this family was the barony of 
Innerpeflray, a female inheritance coming to these 
Drummonds through the Chisbolms of Cromlix. This 

I David, third Lord Maderty, survived hia friend and 
brother-in-law, Montrose, for more than thirty years, 
dying about the close of the reign of Charles the Second, 
He appears to have had a turn for letters, another bond 
of union between him and bis heroic relative ; and 
accordingly, he founded a library and school at Inner- 
peffray (near Crietf, and hard by Montrose's favourite 
haunt, Inchbrakie), a slender but very interesting en- 

> Sm our Mcmoiri of Montrote, 1856 ; vol. i. p. 90; and vul. ii. pp. 430, 



L 



INTEODDCrORT. 



dowment existing to this day. Here Montrcwe's little 
bible, and other books once belonging to him, had found 
a shrine, if such that can be called, where mice and moths 
were, at one time at least, permitted to pasture on its 
treasures. 

All this connects, in a remarkably interesting manner, 
with our previous discoveries relating to the youth and 
education of Montrose, published in our latrat editions 
of his Memoirs, from which we may here quote : — 

"Some interesting particulars of Montrose's studies at 
Glasgow, may be gathered from a note of certain books be- 
longing to the young nobleman, which his tutor (Master 
William Forrett) had borrowed from him, before the removal 
to St Andrew's College took place. These were delivered to 
one of Montrose's curators, Patrick Graham of Inchbrakie, on 
the 9th of August, 1627 ; of which same date, says Inchbrakie 
(in a note under his own band), ' These books were put in my 
Lord's chamber by me, and thereafter put in my Lord hia 
liordship's cabinet by me, his Lordship then being present.' 
There is something even in this scrap which indicates that 
the proprietor of these books was not heedless of their safety ; 
and the list which Inchbrakie has noted is somewhat charac- 
teristic: — ' Two volumes of Sabellicus' Universal History, in 
latin ; Camerarins, his Living Library ; A Treatise of the 
Order of Knighthood ; The Life and Death of Queen Mary ; 
Godfrey de Bidloigne, his History ; The History of Xenophon, 
in latin ; The Works of Seneca witii Lipsius' Commentary.' 
One other book had been anxiously inquired for, and that 
was, — ' specially. Sir Walter Eahigh's History ;' with regard 
to which, Master WilHam Forrett (the young Earl's dominie), 
rephes, — ' As for the History written by Sir WaUer Raleigh, 
my Lord hitnself conveyed it to St Andretcs at kts Lordship's 
first thither going.' Thus we now know the very names of 
some of the books that were placed in the cabinet of Mon- 
trose's college-room, and the one upon which his youthful 
mind was most intent when he made bis first appearance 
there. That time-honoured volume, the wonder of its age, 



I 



^H tM til 

^H Oralta 



INTRODUCTORT. 

and written under circumstances of diatresa and oppression 
that might well have paralysed the stoutest pen, was, it seeme, 
the favourite study of our 3'oiing hero when in his fourteenth 
year, and the book which he had selected (no light burden) to 
take mth himself when be first joined the University. The 
arrival there of the distinguished youth, with his goodly and 
cherished folio, must have created no small sensation."' 

When we wrote all this in 1848, it was not known 
that any of the books enumerated above were yet in 
existence. No volume that had belonged to Montrose 
could we ever succeed in tracing, either in the library 
of his family, or anywhere else. The schoolmaster of 
the Innerpeffray establishment, who is also librarian, 
happened to possess a copy of our Life of Montrose, 
1840 ; and to the fact, that the autograph of the hero 
and martyr himself, appeared upon that dilapidated little 
bible, at Innerpeffray, and also upon the folio Camden, 
his attention was only first directed by observing, in our 
work, the facsimile of Montrose's autograph.* This in- 
duced a comparalio Uierarum, and led to the interesting 
discovery ; and this again, of course, led us ere long to 
the library. We could fii.d no other volume there upon 
which Montrose had written ; but the visit was not 
in vain. Our search was rewarded by the discovery 
of three works, all bearing the autograph of his brother- 
in-law, "Madertie," but which are among those enume- 
rated by Patrick Graham of Inchbmkie, in the list 

> Meiaoriali of Mantrose, 1848-50, See alio our Mcmoin of MoDtrow, 
1666. 

■ So we were inronned. when verj recently' TJsiling thB library, bj thn 
intelligeot ccboolmuter himseif, Mr Gbriiitie, to whom our best thanks are 
due Ibr (be obliging and cealous aid he afTorded ub in searching the library, 
■nd manmcript calalognet. We obtained a half-boliday to the *cboot, in 
of that " btoody butcher, knd excommunicated traitor, Jamn 
OrtAam." 






INTRODUCTORT. 



of 1627. These are, — Camerarius, his Living Library ; 
1621, Fol. : Godfrey of Boulogne, or the recovery 
of Jerusalem: 1024, I''ol.: and Sir Walter Raleigh's 
History of the World, 1G14, Fol.^ Considering where 
they are found, and their dates, it can scarcely be 
doubted, that these are the identical volumes mentioned 
by Patrick Graham of Inchbrakie, in his list of 1627. 
The same library contains sacred and touching memorials 
of his sister, the Lady Beatrix Graham, Lady Madertie ; 
her state bible, namely, in the original crimson velvet 
binding, sadly dilapidated, but still folded in the tattered 
remnants of the crimson velvet and gold-laced bag, in 
which it was wont, probably, to be carried before her to 
the kirk of InnerpefiVay. Sic transit qlwia mtmdi. 
The yew tree of Inchbrakie, called Montrose's Yew, 
could tell us all about it, would it condescend to speak. 



' The antique and apparently origiDnl binding of these Tolamcs, beingmncli 
decajed, has been replaced, even within these fen months, b; modem faalf- 
binding ; it not being known to the librarian that they had most probably 
belonged to Montrose. This unfortunate renovation was uccompliahed be- 
fore we knew of it, or had an opportunity of examining the old boardB, and 
flf-leaves, for autographs, and other accidental authentications. The little 
mouse-eaten bible, however, bad undergone no sacrilegious repair ; and i* 
henceforth to be preserved as a precious relic, in a box made from " Mon- 
^^— trose's Yew," which funereal pile of nature's architecture, yet prodominatea 

^^L over the park of Inchbrakie, vrith tindiminished, and unrivalled aolemnity. 

^^H The present tenant of that ancient scat of a distinguished branch of the 

^^^B Grahams, is Captain the Honourable Arthur Hay Drummond, R.N., a 

^^H younger son of the House of Einnoul, upon whom has devolved the female 

^^H inheritance of the bnruny of Innerpeffmy, along with its intercstiug accessory, 

^^H the school and library founded by Duvid Drutnmond, 3rd Lord Maderty. 

^^V Captain Druinmond's kindness enabled us to examine the library very deli- 

^^B berately, and more than once, under the best and most hospitable of auspices. 

^^1 Our own knowledge of the existence of this curious and interesting library ia 

^^B very recent. The Rev. Henry Molcolni of Dunblane, first called 

^^H tion to the fact, that the autograph of Montrose appeared upon some of thi 

^^^^ volumes ; and, subsequently, the Right Rev. the Bi.ahop of Brechin most 

^^^f kindly obtuned permission to send us Montrose's bible lor inspection, before 

^^V we had visited the library ilt^elf. 



I 






INTRODDCrOHT. 



I 



This interesting and latest discovery on the subject of 
Montrose, aflfords the crowniog instance of that remark- 
able trait in his character which our previous researches 
had enabled us to illustrate in his memoirs. It appears 
to have been a habit of his mind, from his youth upwards, 
to give vent to the deep feelings of the moment, heroic, 
moral, indignant, or sad, in some enthusiastic vei«e, 
pointed couplet, or epigrammatic antithesis. The fly- 
leaf of a favourite volume was his usual tablet for these 
ebullitions of an ardent genius. Doubtless, during his 
meteor career, writing paper was with him somewhat of 
a luxury, and the appliances of a study rather scarce. 
We have shown, in our life of him, that, on his copies 
of Caesar's Commentaries, Quintus Curtius, and Lucan's 
Pbarsalia, he had recorded, in verses of his own compo- 
sition, his ambitious aspirations to emuliite the heroic 
and lettered Roman, and that yet more unapproachable 
prototype, the Macedonian king. As might be expected, 
on his classics are discovered ambitious and heroic senti- 
ments, — on his bible, chiefly moral and Christian apho- 
risms. Even on the latter, however, we find him noting 
heroics from Horace. Notwithstanding the devotion of 
his life, — fated to " write epitaphs in blood, and wounds," 
— he had certainly contrived to become familiar with 
the classics, and accomplished in Fi'ench and Italian. 
The following couplet occurs in one of his saddest effu- 
sions, hastily written (hke his famous metrical vow), upon 
the occasion of the murder of his beloved Sovereign :- 

" Seeing, that but from tmall woet words do come, 
Bat ffreal ona, — they are always dumb." 

Now this isjusta paraphrase of the line in the Hippolytus 
of Seneca, — " Cin-a letex loquuntur, iiigcntes stupent." 
And writing to the Chancellor Hyde when the news of 



INTRODDCrORT. 



the fete of the King reached him, he puts the very same 
in proae, thus : — " The griefs that astonish, speak more 
with their silence tlian those that can complain." To 
this elegant and epigrammatic turn, and culture of mind, 
we owe the characteristic verse, — 

" Ho either feura his fate too much, 
Or hia deBerts are small, 
Who putH it not unto the toncb. 
To gain or lose it all," 

(a sentiment he writes in prose to Prince Rupert), and 
the no less memorable couplet, — 

" I '11 make thee glorious by my pen, 
Aad famous by my sword." 

Again, when indignantly answering the virulent and dis- 
honest prosecution of him by the Covenanting govern- 
ment in 16il, he classically characterises the foul- 
mouthed libel, drawn by the ruffian Warriston, as " Qui 
quilia volantes et teiiti spoUa" instead of saying, riffraff, 
rtibbish, and dust; and with his own boldest hand he in- 
dited, even upon the formal paper given in as his legal 
defence, this verse from the Tristia of Ovid, — 
" Hoc pretium vitee, vic/ilatortimque labonim 
Cepimus ; ingcnto est pxna reperta meo:" 

which may be translated, — 

For life's best labours lavislied on tbe State, 
A patriot's genius Ends a felon's fate : 

And how curious is it to trace the very same habit of 
mind, and mode of expressing intense feeling, illustrat- 
ing the last scene of his life, and mingling with his final 
prayer for salvation, amid the horrors of his death, — 



n bestow o 
pen alt my 



every air I a limb, 
reins, that I may e 



I 



INTRODUCTORY, XXxix 

In the Preface to our Memoirs of Montrose (1856), 

we thufl ventured to challenge the most distinguished 

and dangerous of the historical defamers of his great 
' Bcion, Dundee : — 

" In reileeming, as we hope to have done, the character of 
Montrose from the calumnies of two centuries, by the closest 
of biographical scmtiniee, and the most unquestionable of 
evidonce, we claim to have laboured so far successfully in the 
'cause of justice and truth. But something more remains to 
be achieved in the same stormy period of the Scotish troubles. 
The latest and moat brilhant historian of England, too dis- 
dainful of minute enquiry, where party feeling predominates, 
speaks of the ' seared conscience and adamantine heart,' of 
the great Dundee, and tells us, that ' James Graham of Claver- 
house,' — thus betraying ignorance, or carelessness, of the very 
Dame he ia consigning to unmerited obloquy, — ' rapacious 
and profane, of violent temper, and obdurate heart, has left a 
same which, wherever the Scottish race is settled on the face 
of the globe, is mentioned with a pecuhar energy of hatred.' 
No historical character, we verily believe, was ever more reck- 
lessly portrayed, or in colours more false than these. In due 
time, Deo volente, Dundee, too, must be redeemed from a vul- 
gar error of history, thus glorified by the golden pen that de- 
lights the present age." 

This pledge we hope to have now redeemed, even in 
the present volume. But neither shall it be lost sight of in 
that which is to come. It is no small encouragement, to 
the present undertaking, that we find ourselves univer- 
sally justified in what once seemed so desperate an ad- 
venture, as the rescuing that " bloody murderer and ex- 
communicated traitor," Montrose, not only from the 
fiery furnace of fanaticism, but from the political enmity 
of the most distinguished whig historians of Scotland in 
modern times. We have, indeed, been crowned with 
compliments of very different qualitieo, and from very 



^H compli 



xl 



[NTBODOCTORY. 



opposite quarters. The success of our labours, as the 
champion of the champion of Charles the First, has been 
honourably acknowledged at one end of society, and 
meanly appropriated at the other. Wliile gratified by 
an elegant abridgement, of our more elaborate and con- 
troversial volumes, from the pen of a nobleman whose 
comments, criticisms, and curtailments, conferred honour 
upon the original, we were disgusted in no less a degree 
by that vapouring and blundered adaptation (already 
commented upon), pretending to laborious originality, of 
the cream of our own discoveries and labours, emanating 
from the cheap-and-nasty system of second-hand author- 
ship. Or, to couch it in what Lord Macaulay terms 
Johnsonese, — Enthusiastically reviewed by the lettered 
genius of a senatorial Stanhope ; disingenuously extracted 
by the venal industry of a trading pen ; at once deco- 
rated by the hand of honour, and soiled by the feelers of 
suction, — we may boast of having inspired a peer, and 
attracted a parasite. 



I 
I 



The frontispiece to this volume is engraved from a 
contemporary print of Viscount Dundee, so rare that 
only two copies of it are known to exist. One is in the 
Bodleian Library. The fortunate possessor of the other 
is Mr Stirling of Keir, who acquired it from the sale at 
Strawberry Hill. Having been engraved by WilUams, 
an artist contemporary with bis subject, considerable 
reliance may be placed upon the resemblance ; but the 
painting is not known from whence the engraving is 
derived ; if, indeed, there was any painted portrait of 
the kind. It is a mezzotint, in folio, and of no mean 
pretensions as a work of art. But that mode of engrav- 
ing was very apt to impart thickness, if not coarseness, 



INTRODUCTOKr. xU 

lo the features of a portrait, a defect which may be per- 
ceived in many of the otherwise beautiful mezzotints of 
the works of Sir Joshua Reynolds ; and most probably, in 
this instance, the features of Claverhouse have lost some- 
what of their characteristic fineness, and expression. In 
the present line engraving, however, from the able and 
accurate bui-in of Mr Bell, that artist has adhered as 
closely as possible to the contemporary priut. To Mr 
Stirling of Keir our best thanks are due, for the use of 
his rare treasure. 

The second portrait of our hero which gi-aces this 
volume, is most accurately engraved, by Mr Banks jun., 
from a kit-cat oil painting, deemed an original, in 
possession of the family of Graham of Airth, to whom 
also our thanks are due for the permission to engrave it. 

I Other portraits of Dundee, no less authentic, %vill appear 
\a our second volume. 
To Charles K. Sharpe, these Memorials are further 
indebted for three engraved plates ; natnely, the armorial 
(llate for the title-page ; and two plates of autographs, 
which will also find their place in the next volume. 
These Mr Sharpe himself presented to us, along with the 
fragmentary manuscript we have printed ; and, being 
very earnest and zealous in the promotion of this work, 
he promised at the same time to search in his reposi- 
tories for more fragments of manuscript, and further 
decorative illustrations of the subject. But, — ricthna 
nil miierantis Oiri, — that promise was not destined to be 
fuUilled. A box-full of his papers, now in possession of 
his sister Mrs Bedford, was, at our request, obhgingly 
ransacked for us by that lady, who assured us, — " I have 
examined all the MS. in ray possession, and now for- 
ward to you all that I think may be useful to you ; I 
mtieo enclose a drawing of the ring." These stray frag- 



^Huw end 



xlll INTRODUOTOar. 

ments, which only came to hand after we had piinU 
the more orderly manuscripts given us by Mr Sbarpel 
himself, were fortunately in time to be added in ; 
supplementary form. 

Our publisher Mr Stevenson, between whom and IVbrl 
Sharpe the bond of antiquarianism had long subsisted,! 
haa illustrated these manuscripts with a characteristiol 
sketch, taken from a photograph portrait presented to 
him by his friendly patron himself. He is therein re- 
presented at an advanced period of his life, and as he is 
best remembered now. The resemblance was approved 
by himself; for he distributed copies of the photograph 
among bis friends, including his antiquarian publisher. 
Several of the quaint productions of his pencil were 
executed for works published by Mr Stevenson ; who, 
not very long since, parted with the copperplates to add 
to a collection made by Mrs Bedford, which that lady 
told us she hoped one day to publish, as a memorial of 
her brother's pecuUar accomplishments. This mortj 
acceptable idea, we sincerely trust, will not prove one c^m 
those luxurious schemes of letters, that are more apt to | 
be propounded than fulfilled. One amusing specimen, 
however, we have taken to illustrate, and enliven, this J 
our too imperfect record of its accompUshed author, — I 
Sir Walter Scott's " inimitable virago." It haa been I 
already twice published, * and thrice engraved in different I 

■ Finti na an illustration of Keiiilworlb, io the Abbotsford edilioo, when ^ 
there is a spirited woodcut, in minialure, of this gem of Mr Sharpe'a 
and graphic powers. It wm subsequently engraved in a leas reJuced form, ' 
ai the fronliapiecc to Mr TurnbuU's work, entitled,— " Lkttebs of Mart I 
SrcART, QuF.EM OK Scotland, Selected from the ' Recueil des l^ettru 
de Marie Stuart,' together with ihe Chronological Summary of Eventl 
during her Reign, by Frince Alexander Labanoff. Translated, with Note* 
and an Introduction, by Williara B. Turnbull. 8vo. /ne frontispiece of 
Queen Eiizabelh dancing, hy Chnrlet Kirkpalrkk Sharpe, I^ondon, Charles 
Dolman, 18*5." Ai Mr Dolman, with Mr Turnbull'a pcrmiision, wai lo good 



IKTfiODCOrOKr. 



xUii 



rizea. The copperplate of the octavo size is the property 
of Mr Dolman, the London publisher, to whose liberality 
Mr Stevenson waa indebted for the loan of it, to illustrate 
these notices of C. K. Sharpe,' — whose name, erst a 
household word in "Auld Reekie," be himself was wont 
thus wittily to express, in the following musical mono- 
gram, which he occasionally used as a visiting card. 




M to lend the plale to oar publiBber for the purpoac, U Uaa been repe&ted 
h«re. Mr TumbuU also engraTed the eame, of the aize of the original, for 
dittribution Kinong hb frieods. 

' An Edinburgh celcbrlly ia his daj, and himwtf fur descended, CborJea 

L Sharps was a habilue of some of the most ariatocrolic families of Scotland. 

B such circlee, his fund of dry humour and causlic wil never failed to 
_ nder him a welcome guest. Tlie charaeteriatic treble, something between 
the humourous and the querulous, in which he uttered urnot, greatly heightened 
(he effect. A lady who prided herself, perhaps too much, upon the delicadei 
of her table, having quarrelled with Sbarpe, was so rash as to attempt to 
rectum him before comiMny by a reproachful speech, which never got beyond 
ihid commencement : — " Oh I Mr Sharpe, ajter the many good dinners," — 
" And the many bad,''' struck in the incorrigible delinquent, with a sudden 
■nap whiirh most effectually silenced the well known imperious lady. He 
chiefly aflccted select circlet, where bia conversation was moat likely to 
tcU. The curious melange of mmisters and military, black spirits and red, 
lawyers and " lobsters," that crowded the ievecs of the Lord High Com- 
nuMDoner, he could not abide. Once, however, the Lady of his Gmco wiled 
bim to her tea-table, to aid her to entertain the Scotch clergy by whom 
■he expected to be surrounded. Charles was coaxed to go, niu/dini gemeat. 
But the General Assembly sat late, and our humourist, a little out of 
humour, had to encounter, in a very hot tea-room, a bevy of reU-coats, his 
own being ibe only black one in the circle. " I see," he said, tSter a 
cbaracteriatic survey with his never failing eye-ghus, " your Lady«hip has 



^HiiW the 



xliv 



INTKODDCrORT. 



Even since the foregoing pages were sent to press, 
another testimony has come to light, like one from the 
dead, to bear witness against the Covenant. At page 
286 of this volume will be found Mr Sharpe's account of 
the battle of Bothwell Bridge, and of the preparations 
which the Covenanters had there made, to put to death on 
the spot all the prisoners who might fall into their hands. 
But Mr Sharpe was not aware of tlie existence of the 
standard which they carried upon that memorable oc- 
casiou. This very recent discovery has been most 
obligingly communicated to us by Mr James Drura- 
mond, R.S.A., a distinguished artist, whose great work, 
the procession of Montrose as a prisoner, from the Water- 
gate of Edinburgh to the Tolbooth, formed one of the 
most attractive features in the Exhibition of the 
Scottish Academy for this season. As the discovery of 
this brimstone banner is entirely due to that gentleman, 
who has just favoured us with the communication, we 
shall give the story in his own words : — 



" In reference to the conversation we had the other 
day, concerning the ' Bluidy Banner' which I saw at 
Dunbar, I may mention, that, some months ago, being 
informed by a friend from Dunbar, that he knew the 
people who had the said flag or banner, I accompanied 
him, while on a visit in that neighbourhood, a few 
weeks since, to the house of the old couple, who, with 
some difficulty, were prevailed upon to show it, and allow 
me to make a drawing of the interesting relic. It is 
of blue silli, here and there a little faded, but having 
been treasured as a precious hetr-loom, is in very good 
preservation. On it there is inscribed, in Hebrew 
characters, gilded, 'Jefaova nissi,' (the Lord is mv 
banner). The silk has given way where some of these 



INTRODDCTORT. xlv 

letters are painted, and what lettere remain are bo 
tender that they will hardly bear touching. The next 
line is painted in white, — ' For Christ and His Truths ;' 
and then comes the line from which the banner derives 
its name, — 

*No Quarters To Y^ Active Enimies of Y^ Co\'enant.' 

Lis seems to have been painted in some light colour 
ret, and afterwards repainted in a dull faded looking 
in fact, quite a ' bluidy colour.' The banner is 
\ feet 5^ inclies, by 3 feet 5^ inches. Had this been 
fown to me as a mere relic, without any history, 1 
lever for a moment would have doubted its genuineness. 
[ shall give its history as told by the proprietors. It 
wlonged to Hall of Haughhead, who wa-s a zealous cove- 
"nanter and a leader at Drumclog, and Bothwell Brig. 
From the latter, he escaped and fled to Holland, but 
shortly returned, and while lurking near Queensferry, 

Bere was an attempt made to seize him by the governor 
Blackness Castle. Hall being mortally wounded in 
e struggle, died on his way to Edinburgh, a prisoner. 
1 him was found an unsubscribed document, afterwards 
lied the 'Queensferry Paper.'' Hall's son, while on 
b'la deathbed, gave the banner to an enthusiastic cove- 
nanting friend, of the name of Cochrane ; his own son, 
having turned ' conformist' clergyman, was not thought 
worthy to be custodier of such a precious relic. This 
Cochrane, after wandering about from place to place, set- 
tled in Coldstream. His son again bequeathed the banner 
to his youngest daughter, Mary Cochrane, who married 
Mr Raeburn in Dunbar, the father of Mr and Miss Rae- 
Imm, who now possess it. Along with the banner there 

See Ibe dentb of Hall of Hsughhexl recorded in this volnnie, p. 3IK>i 
Shtrpc's fragment. 



^^Blr Shtrpc't 




xlvi INTEODUCrrORT. 

was also bequeathed to Cochrane a chest of arms. These 
have been gradually given away, excepting two swords. 
I give it the name of the ' Bluidy Banner,' simply be- 
cause Miss Kaeburn so designated it herself." 

Besides this curious information, we are much in- 
debted to Mr Drummond for the use of his artistic fac- 
simile, on a reduced scale, of the relic in question, to be 
lithographed for this volume. It will be found in its 
proper place, forming a very apt illustration to Mr 
Sharpe's account of the battle of " Bothwell Brig." 

And thus, by a happy turn of fortune, even after some 
pages of this Introduction had been sent to press, we 
have been enabled to add to our discoveries two impor- 
tant illustrations, aflbrding a very striking conti-ast be- 
tween the calumniated and the calumniators, namely, 
the pocket bible of Montrose, and the battle bible of the 
Covenanters, 



6 AiNsi.iK Placb, 
Mag 1859. 



« Memoirs of Montrose b 

Roulkdge, 1858. Se 



■ James Grant, published by Messrs 

p. XXV. of this Introduction. 



Our own discoveries relative to the literary accomplislimentB 
and habits of Montrose, — his propensity to quote the classics, 
— to indite couplets, and quotations, on the blank leaves of hia 
copies of the classics, nay, on liis very bible, — would have been 
all entirely eclipsed by the following discovery, — were it true. 
It is the only pretension to a new discovery relating to the hero 
that is to he met with in the Grant-Boutledge rifacimenio of 
Napier's Memoirs of Montrose : — 

" During his exile, Montrose seems to have turned his atten- 
n again to those literary pursuits, which the stormy events 
of late years had so completely interrupted ; and a small xuork 
tvritten by him in Latin, entitled — ' De Rebus Auspiciis Sere- 
nissiuii et Potentissiini Caroli, Dei Gratia Magna Britannia 

■Begis,' &c., was published /w Aim at Paris in 1648," (p. 346). 
What ? Montrose, in exile, the avowed publishing author, 
M a relaxation after liis great career of victory, of " a amaU 
work in Latin" about Charles the First, by way of a renewal 
of his prerioua " literary pursuits"? The fact, if it be a fact, 
is most interesting, and never heard of before. But the for- 
tunate author who made the discovery, seems in this sentence 
to have expended his ability to explain the work ; for he ex- 
plains it no further. Intelligent reader, what he quotes is just 
the title-page of Dr Wishart'a Latin History of the Wars of 
Montrose, the second edition of which was published in Paris 
in 1648! A very crude acquaintance with Montrose, and the 
Latin language, can alone account for this curious notice. 
But in his hand-to-mouth scramble for materials and illustra- 
tions, when hastily concocting this cheap literary speculation, 
carved out of the real labour of another, the author of the 

BoutJedge publication of course very soon discovered that that 

^^^^hich he had imagined to be" a^mallworkin Latin" writt«n by 



iJ 



xlviii NOTE ox grant's MONTROSE, 

Montrose himself, because he had leimre m his exile to resume 
hie " literary pursuits," was in fact the Latin of that notorioua 
work by Dr Wishart ; and so, in a subsequent page, he thrusts 
into a note (most unnecessarily, as regards either historical or 
biographical information,) the Bishop's Latin title-page more 
fully given. This is done without any allusion to the pre- 
ceding blunder, which had in fact necessitated the qtiietly cor- 
rective repetition. A literary forager, who has to maintain 
the independence of his research, and the originality of his 
own knowledge of the subject in hand, cannot afford to confess 
to such blunders as these. Accordingly, when, as one illus- 
tration against the veri/ high pretensions put forth in Chan- 
cery in support of the Routledge publication, this blot was hit 
by the plaintiff, the author James Grant's Affidavit was re- 
quired in defence ; and the intelligent reader will judge whe- 
ther his explanation suffices to extricate this enthusiastic bio- 
grapher of Montrose, — who depones, that that biography cost 
him " immense labour" f!) — out of the scrape of apparent ig- 



" As to the thirty-fourth paragraph of the said plaintiff's 
affidavit, / «ny, that the book there referred to is stated, 6y mis- 
take, to have been written by Montrose, instead of /or Mon- 
trose. In page 386 of my work I give the full title and pur- 
pose of this book, which / well know, and is a small volume 
of 248 pages, labelled on the back ' Monlisros.'" 

Let us do full justice to this laborious biographer, by here re- 
peating the erring passage with that very simple emendation: — 

" During his exile Montrose seeim to have turned his atten- 
tion again, to those literary pursnifs, which the stormy events 
of late years had so complet-ely interrupted, and a small work 
written /or Mm in Latin, entitled — ' De Eebus Auspiciis Sere- 
nissimi et Potentissimi Caroli Dei Gratia MagnjB Britannise 
Regis," Ac, was published ,/(W him at Paris in 1648." 

Whether this emendation bo successful, will be judged of 
by the structure of the sentence. Was it possible to infer from 
sneh a sentence, that the writer really understood this to be 
the famous and notorioua history of Montrose's wars, com- 
posed by his chaplain Dr Wishart? Was that great work 
written "for Montrose," and published " /or Montrose;" and 



PUBLISHED BY MESSRS ROUTLEDGE, xUx 

hecmtse Montrose had leisure in his exile to " turn his attention 
again to literary pursuits"? Chancery ia easily blinded, or ver^' 
willing to bo so, in such matters, if this explanation suffice 
to rebut the imputation nf mere scrambling, and sustain the 
pretension of laborious research, in a. question of literary piracy. 
But let U8 now, in further justification of the remarks in 
the preceding Introdm^tion, aflford a sample or two of the 
piratical dealing complained of. 

We discovered, and completely authenticated, a portrait of 
Montrose, taken when he was only seventceu years of age. 
This portrait, preserved in the family gallery of Kinnaird 
Caetle ever since the date of its being painted, had been lost 
sight of, under a wrong name, and was unknown oven to the 
posBesfiora, the Carriegies of Southesk, as a portrait of Mon- 

Mroee. This fortunate discovery led to the portrait's being 

gjgraved for our Memorials of Montroso and his Times, 

; and, in the same work, we wrote the history of its dis- 

"oovery, and a minute description of the portrait itself. James 
Grant, taking the whole of the three first chapters of his Me- 
moirs of Montrose, published by Eoutledge iu 1858, relating 
to the boyhood, education, and youthful marriage of Montrose, 
in design, materials, ornaments, and sentiments, not from 
documents merely, but from our text, — composed from our own 
bcoveries for the first time in 1848, and republished by ug 
jtim in our latest edition, 1856, — seizes, inter alia, the 
reiy popular subject of the youthful portrait, wherewith to 
adorn his own text. He suppresses the/act that wo had made 
that interesting discovery, and published an account of it. 
He suppresses the /act tliat we had procured the portrait to be 
engraved. Hi:- suppresses the fact that we had minutely de- 
scribed the portrait. He warn** us not ; but merely says, " Mon- 
trose was now in his sixteenth yoar, and of his api)earauce a 
ffcrfeci description can be furnished from the portrait pre- 
terved at Kinnaird by the family of Carnegie." And then he 
forthwith proceeds to "fumiBli,"'a«At«0K7i,a"perfect descrip- 
tion" of a portrait which he never saw, which he only knows 
thioagh the mediimi of our engraving, and to which engraving 

CB not even venture to allude I Why this extraordinary 
ce as to the history of a portrait which he proceeds to 




^HtFoee. 
^^BHigrav 



aacamet 
^^Uiscovei 
^^^erbatin 
^^erypo; 



I 



MOTE ON GRANTS MONrROSE, 



describe with entkusiamn f Surely, because of that which, in 
questions of ht«rary piracy, lawyers call the " animttsfura'udi." 
Did he not know, that the " perfect description," published as 
his, was essentially ours, — and ours the discovery ^ 

Jamts Granfs Detcriplion, 1S58. 

" A fair camplexioned yoiilh, with 



Our Daeription, 1848 and 1856. 

" A boy of /air and toniewhat deli- 

jpteiion, WM smiling 



the 



eate 

ipectator, witli an aaptect ihat epok( 
not of ' the Troubles.' But tie port 
erect and lordly, the exuberant auburn 
Aair, of a direr hue than the later 
portraits, the penetrating grey eye, 
the finely moulded nose, tcitli its sen- 
silive nostril, and the eharacterialic 
txpreuion of the enmprcned lips, as 
yet devoid of the shadow at a mous- 
tache, at once suggested the jouog 
Montrose. Then the sumptuous dress 
— o rich otiee veleet doublet, profusely 
iliuied uiith while salin, every team 
and edge trimmed with gold, and over 
the collar a lace ruff' of the most deli- 
eate texture — seemed to announce the 
boy Benedict in his wedding bravery. 
A. closer inspection discovered these 
dates painted by the original artist on 
Oie upptr car/icr, lo the right of the 
head,—' anno 1629, atalU 37 ;' and 
in the background, near the left shoul- 
der, this autograph — ' Jamemn,fecil.' 
" There it stitl exists, in high pre- 
tervation; nor has this portrait been 
known to have quitted iJie Castle 
of Kinnaird during the (loo centuries 
u>hich have elapsed since it was paint- 
ed." 

And this portrait, — " yet hanging unfaded and unchanged 
in the hall of Kinnaird," — our copyist had never set eyes upon I 
The enthusiasm of such a discovery miglit well induce (he 
discoverer to an enthusiastic description. But what induced 
the extraordinary coincidence of the very same enthusiastic de- 
scription from the pen of James Grant ? His defence, in reply 
to this item of the charge of piracy, made against him in 
Chancery, is extremely reckless. He had not ventured, indeed. 



aud dark gref) tya, i 
what aquiline, and a proudly cut lip. 
T!ie thick auburn hair is parted over 
the left eye, and curls in heavy locks 
below his ears. He is represented Id 
a rich doublet of olive coloured taffeta, 
buttoned close up to his thick falling 
ruff of point lace, and having three 
lung slaihei of while salin on each side 
of the buttons. Folds of cloth like 
the modern military wing, encircle 
the shoulders ; the sleeves are loose, 
and itaehed with white satin ; and the 
edges are ail bound with slender gold 
cord, for it was a time when, as Sir 
Philip Warwick says, ' we courtiers 
valued ourselves much upon our good 
clothes.' The right upper comer of 
the picture is inscribed ' anno 1629, 
atatis 17 ;' and in the left lower cor- 
ner are the words, ' Jamesone, Feet.' 



" More than two centuries ham 
passed away, since the orti^'s pencil 
traced the ft-iiturcs of that handsome 
and high-spirited boy ; but, unfaded 
and unchanged, the portrait yet hangs 
in the hall of Kinnaird." 



of 

1^^ mi 

'' we 

wh ... . 

^^— pterin 



PUBLISHED Br MESSRS ROUTLEDGE. il 

to put it into his Affidavit; but in certain manuscript notes, 
written upon the margins of a copy of his own work, and pro- 
duced in C/taTiceri/, he repudiates the idea of having derived 
this description from any of our works, and simply noLes, 
"Described from the published portrait, or engraving t But 
how could he derive his minute description of colours from an 
engraving, — the " dark grey eyes," — the " auburn hair," — the 
" olive-coloured doublet," — the " white satin," — the " slender 
gold cord?" How could our engraving (to which, moreover, he 
never alludes in his work,) have suggested to him the very 
phraaeology of description, which the discovery of the painting 
iteelf had suggested to tlie author who discovered it ? 

Now, this is not merely an appropriation oi historical /acts, 
at of the contents of family documents, discovered and pre- 
vionsly published by another. It is, in addition to that, a 
transference of the literary composition, the uej-y icords, of the 
prior author, who had made such researches and discoveries. 
Kor is the above a solitary instance of that same species of 
direct piracy, both of /acta and composition., to be found in the 
Soutledge publication. It is a fjiir sample of the general 
(diaracter, and staple of that derivative publication, from be- 
ginning to end ; and the Athen^um (March 20. 1858) never 
characterised a literary performance more accurately, or ad- 
ministered a caatigation more just, than the following, in the 
publication of which wo had no hand whatever : — 

" It is time that some inquiry were made into the ethics of 
cheap publishing. As far as such a movement furnishes 
(without the infringement of private rights) good literature 
at a moderate price to the public, every sensible person will 
pve it approbation and encouragement. But is the pretence 
of cheapness, and the free use of that favourite term, ' the 
million,' to jnstiiy practices which are condemned in all trades, 
imd in literature are pevtiUarly ungenerous f Is a dear book, 

whatever merit, to be looked on simply as raw material, for 
the manufacture of cheap books ? These are questions which, 
we fancy, the British public can only answer in one way, and 
which they may answer, on this occasion, in a manner not very 
Riming io Mr James Grant. The plain fact is, that Ur 
it has borrowed from his predecessor aU thai A« dared, and 



I 



I 



4 



fii 



NOTE ON GRANTS MONTROSE, 



ignored his existence as much as he could. Tiiere are whoh 
po^es which he could no more have written without his assist- 
ance than one could build a house without bricks," &c. 

But it is not simply the " raw material" that this writer has 
appropriated. He helps himself throughout to the mami/oc^MJ^ 
article, without ceremony or the slightest acknowledgment. 

We, for the first time discovered, and thus described, the 
domestic hahita of Montrose's father: — 



Our Narralive, 1648 and 1856. 

" Tha Eari lived the retired U/e of 
a country genllemav, nnd Bcems to 
hare been very dameatic in nil bis 
habit*. Somotbing of these ma; be 
gathered from tlie family accounU, 
of which the fen extracts given below 
iodiiale tliat he amused hinaelf with 
archery and gulfing, aad indulged 
■omewiiat in lobaeeo," &c. 

" For half ane ptind tobacco sent 
to the Weit countrio to my Lord, 
8 lib. . . 8s. 4d. 

" For an unce of tobacco cod to 
hie Lordship in October 162S, 9s. 4d." 

" Montrose's father wos much ad- 
dicted to the uie ef tobacco and pipes ; 
but there is a tradition that MontroBe 
himself could not abide tht smell of 
tobacco." 



James Grand, 1858. 

" The old Earl had kd the life of a 
quiet countn/ gentleman, bis sole amtue- 
menls being smohing, golfing, and shoot- 
ing Kith the iow. His household book- 
ia full of entries such ns the following: 
— For golf-balls, bow-strings, tobac- 
co-pipes," &c. 

" For one puniJ of tobacco sent 
from the West countrie to mj- Loi-d, 
3 lib., . 8s. W. 

'* For an nnee of tobacco coft to 
his Lordship,, in October 1623, 

9s. 4d. Scots." 

" Though the Earl Mems to bare 
been an inveterate gmoter, the }^ung 
Lord, his SOD, like James YI., bad 
imbibed a horror of lobaeeo." 



I 



The only difference here is, that the copyist, in his piratical 
haste, blunders the items of the domestic accounts, which be 
had copied from our accurate page. Eg takes the very same 
liberty with our interesting illustrations of Montrose's infancy 
and education, which had never been discovered or described 
before : — 



Our Narrative, 1848 and 1866. 
" Montrose ipns early in the saddle. 
How early, is now only known for 
the first timci and to the humble re- 
cords of the anril is due all the merit 
of affordioE authentic indications oi' 
his infant chivalry : — 



James Grant's, 1858. 
" The little Lord James was earli/ 
jiractised in horsemanship, and every 
other accomplishment necessary I 
complete the education of ftwell-bred 
cavalier ; when only eight years of age, 
• twa naigs' seem tu have been kept 



PUBLISHED BY MESSRS KOPTLEDGE. 



Our Narrative, 1848 and 1856. 
" Compts of my Lordia Iloree- 
! Khooae,furnifhit, and pavitboUarie 
[ BUckwood, in Adu. 1620, SI, and 
f SS jeiria.' " 

" Item on 29 of September 1620, 

I forJyvegangofsehoocietomj- Lord's 

se before bia Lordship nide to 

I Bo«edo, V. lb. 

" Item, for twa gangof achoone to 

I Ziord Jama' taa naiga, xxiilj. sh. 

" At tbe dale of mis item in the 

blaclumicb's nccount, Montrose had 

either Bcarcely, or bad onli/jiut com- 

pkltd hii tighth year; jet he was al- 

Madjin poweaaionofaperjonaf jfnJ." 



Jamti Grant'), 1859. 
for his etpecial tiie ; and among man)- 
items of fiirriery, in hia pricate ac- 
couHtM, paid by Harie Bluukwood, 
and recently prinled /or the Maitland 
Club, we find, on 29th September 
163!), for 5 gang of scboone to my 
Lord's horse before his Lordship radu 
to Rossdhu, 6 lb. Scots." 



^^^^^lifl wi 



And mark his cunning introduction of the words, " and 
recently printed for the Maiiland Club"\ They are intended to 
convey the impression that he is not borrowing any biographi- 
cal composition of ours, or even biographical iUmtrations used 
by UB, but that this uao, of new and interesting matter relative 
to the early training of Montrose, is a biographical idea, and 
eomposition, of his mvn, resulting from what, in hia Affidavit 
in Chancery, he calls, " my collecting some of the facts relating 
to the early life of Montrose, with great labour! from the two 
•to volumes in which the documents containing such facts 
[We printed." Now the fact is, that those particular accounts, 
:»r8 documents not printed anywhere. Having the entire com- 
land of these family papers, we judged that it was unnecessary 
to print all the domestic accounts ; and so in this instance we 
erely used a very few extracts to illustrate and add interest 
vU> our biographical chapter. There alone could our parasitv 
ind tliem ; and his " collecting with great labour," (which he 
twliere calls " immense labour"), simply amounts to this, 
lat lie transfers from our pages to his own pagen, not only 
the biographical illustrations, wliicli our selerled extracts fur- 
nish, but also the biographical design, sentiment, and pkraseo- 
lot^y which constitute our own literary cojh^xjsiViow ,■ and all 
Wfl without any rocngnition of ns I 



Uv 



NOTE ON GRANTS MONTROSE, 



Again, compare these other passages, relating to Montrose's 
youth and education, published by ua/or the first time: — 



Our Narrative, 1648 and 1856. 

" Monlrose'i parent had wisely 
judged that a life of riding and feno- 
Ing at hoDie was not sufficient train- 
ing for a young nobleman of so 
forward a spirit as tliit tole hope of 
the Graham ; and accordingly we find, 
irom the Southcsk Papers, that he 
haA placed him, ivhen ta-dce years of 
age, at Glasgow, willi an establish- 
ment consisting of a private tutor, 
two pages, and a valet." " Among 
the papers in ibis purt will be found 
a reodpt granted by Dame Agnes 
Boyd, the lady of Sir George Eljihin- 
tlone of BIylkswood, acting during the 
absence of her busbaad, for the rent 
' of lie parte of our greale lodging, 
with the pertinents situnl at the wyno 
heade, in Glasgow." 

>> The namo of the tutor or pcda- 
gog, as he is termed in the household 
accounts, was Master William For- 
ret ; thetitleJfiufcr, which he always 
silpemdds to his signature, indicating 
that he had taken a degree. The two 
pages were called William and Mungo 
Graham." 

" We ham a notice of what pro- 
bably was his frst iitord of any 
value; and it is interesting to learn 
that it was presented to him by his 
frierid and councillor. Lord Napier. 
' I grant me,' says Mr Wiliiam, ' to 
have in keeping a gilded sword, which 
which my Lord got from my Lord 
Napier; with a silk and nli-rr scarf 
which my Lord got from hia umtjuill 
(late) noble father, with a belt and 
hangers ; and a crose-ticir set taiih 
tHOlher-of-pearl. Ai for the braun 
hagb'il, it was sent to his Lordship, 
o St Andrews." 



James Grant's, 1858. 
" His father seems to have spared 
nothing to make his eldest son, the 
hope of his honse and clan, perfect in 
everything reriuislto for a soldier and 
noble, and to fit him for the serrice 
of Scotland, either in the cabinet or 
the field. In 1634 he sent him, at 
the age of twelve, to Glasgow, for the 
benefit of his studies ; and there, for 
more than a year, ho occupied part 
of the great lodging of Sir George 
Elphinsloae of BbjtktiMud, utuated 
near the townhead, for which a rent 
was paid to the family factor, to Dame 
Agues Boyd." 



" His pedagogue was WiUiam For- 
ret. Master of Arti, and two pages of 
his own name, William and Mungo 
Grahame, attended him." 



' ' His first gilded saord, 

which, about the same period, was 

presented to him bghis brother-in-law. 
Lord Napier ; his scarf of silk and 
tisi'it, probably the work of his fair 
sisters ; his brazen hackbut and cross- 
bow set with nolhcr-of-pearh, all of 
which his tutor states he had in his 
keeping," &c. 



PUBLISHED BT MESSRS ROUTLEDGE. 



Jatnee Graufi, 1858. 

" Tomn drummers and piperi h« 
especittlly lavoured, and they seem to 
have irelcomed and preceded him 
wlierever lie icent. He never (mik 
iorje, but at the ' oiilou/iiiig or lichl- 
ing,' (i. e. mounting and dUmounting) 
ho acatterud a handful of Bilver among 
the crowd," &c. 

" The cavalier noble appears to 
have patronjacil and scattered his 
money freely among all jugglers, poa- 
ture-makera, da ndng- girls, wander- 
ing pipers, and dicar/a, but still more 
freely among tlie poor and needy. 
It U impoaalble to enumerate the 
entries of money bestowed by his 
orders upon the medicants, when 
tbey loitered everywhere at tbe tirk 
stiles, bridge ends, and town gates ; 
and it is lemarlcable that, notwilh- 
stunding the Acts of the Scottish 
Purti anient concerning the restriction 
of triih emigration, they teem to have 
been then nearly as n 
clamorous for alms u 



Our space only admits of a few more extracts. For example, 
'|lw interview between Montrose auJ Qiioon Ilenriotta Maria: 



Oar Narrative, 1848 and 1856. 
" Belli, trampeU, pipes, drumt, and 
Ilea, Kea to have been put in re- 
fwui'Itnn by him tcherever he went," &e. 
*' Hia purse wai alwayi open to ttie 
netdg. He never ' lake) harse,^ or 

»' Imipa on,' or dismounts, or ' goes to 
llie fields,' or passes through a gate, 
or visits a town, without bestowing 
•ometbing on tbe poor. An bonest 
man by the way, a poor pooC or 
' rymer,' tbe rabble looking on at bis 
archery, a dumb woman, a dirarf at 
the door, and, not tbe least interest- 
ing occasion when we consider the 
aut>*eqaenC lie between them, ' some 
poor Jrith inomeii at the gate of 
Bimeo,' and *anc Iriuli man begging 
M the gate of Glamis,' are all suc- 
OCBsful appeals lo hia charity." 

" Beaides the luwii musitian* whom 
he *eems to have kept in pay through- 
out the districts of Scotland whiub be 
frequented, we find bim paying min- 

Iatrals, morrice dancers, and jug- 
glers," 8:c. 



Our Ifarralive, 1838 and 1840. I 
" At York, when the Queen had I 
recovered from tbo faliguca and agi- 
tations of hi>r voyage, she sent for 
UoMrute lo continue tbo confereace. 
There, however, Hamilton also joined 
ber, and the high-minded impetaoui 
Montront, who had never been suffer- 
ed by the fiivourite to enter tbe court 
circle, was no match far a practised 
^|>Iomatut, and plausible double- 
dealer," Ac 

" Uonlrotte was diteomfittd and 
HitniMed, hit proud heart tvelling ii\l,ii 

CisneM of truth and loyalty 
Bd," k<: 



Jama Grant's, ie&8. 

" Henrietta, having deferred all 
deliberations until she reached that 
place, [York] immediately upon her 
arrival lent fur Montrose, who, on 
entering her presence-chamber, found 
by her side bis old rival the Duke of 
Hamilton," &c. 

" In court intrigue and studied rfn- 
plicity, the open, frank, and solditr- 
likc Montrose was no match for Ha- 
tniltun," &c. 

" Montrose was romptUed again to 
retire, and wilix his proud luarliipolltn 
by sorrow and disdain, lie left York," 
Sic. 



In 



NUTE ON GRANT S MONTROSK, 



Grant's footr-note to these passages, is simply " Wishart"! 
But neither in the Latin, nor in any translation of Wishart, 
do the phrases, or the sentiments, we have put in italics occur. 
The phrases, " no match for," anil " his proud heart swelling," 
are only to bo found in Napier's " Montrose and the Cove- 
nanters," 1838, and Napier's " Life and Times of Montrose," 
1840 ; which works are not alluded to. 

Again, Montrose's first interview with Charles 1. : — 



Out Narrative, 1838 oiirf 1840. 

" The monarch may indeed have 
particular!}' desired to reclaim Mon- 
trote. Struck by hisslattlg and heeok 
bearing, contrasted with the irraxrent 
letitg e/Rirtha, and tlic repuUiM de- 
mocracy of Archibald Johniton, and, 
perhaps, favourably imprcucd by ihc 
humane forbearance whicli, contrary 
to the wish of the Covenfltiting olergy, 
bad charucterised Montnwe even in re- 
bellion, it is not nnlikely that Charles, 
■n the words of bia favourite poet, 
may ha*e inwardly exclaitncd at tbo 
BightofhiiUj'Ofor a fill eoner'a voice,'" 



" Wc believe, then, that MontroHC 
Lad/e/( his heart yearn loieardi Charles 
tlie Firtl, and that he departed from 



James GranCi, 1858. 
" The King was compelled for the 
time tfl conceal his reecotment, and 
endeavoured to sootbc and ici'n the 
gallant Jlfonlroie, whose uccomplish- 
monta of mind and peraon made bim 
BO immensely superior to lus compa- 
triots, among whom were the blunt 
Rothes, the false and haughty Argyle, 
the immoral Loudon, and the base- 
minded Johnstone of Warriston, the 
most active agent of the Presbyte- 
rians," &c. '' Charles bad heard, too, 
how the Earl had spared, from wok 
and destruction, his city of Aberdeen, 
in direct vii/latioa of the orders of the 
Estates, whoso anger that act of mercy 
bud exdted. Thus he was most &- 
Toumbly disposed towards bim. They 
bad frequent friendly intervieirs at 
Berwick, and the Earl bade adieu to 
Charles, with a heart that yearned at 
last toumrds him," &c. 



It la ainuatng to find that, when Montrose's " proud heart" 
stifelts in our pa^, it swells in our parasite's also ; when it 
yearns in our page, it yearns in his. For the above passages 
he has no reference at all. No such passages occur in Wishart, 
The contrast between Montrosf, and Rothes and Warrialon, 
is directly transferred from our page. But he feared to risk 
the conspicuous quotation, " I'or a falconer's voice," Ac. 
Again, in describing the efi'ect u\mn Montrose ol' the sudden 
jutelligenco of the King's death. Grant transfers directly from 



PUBUSHED BY MESSRS ROUTLEDGE. 



Eonr narrative, ■with scarcely a difference. The paiv.llel ea> 
f pressiojw, printeil in italics, do not occur in the tra-mlafio-ns of 
1 Witharl, but only in our works, as below : — 



Ovr Narratiue, 1S40 and 1856. 

" Tie »C«oe is nwiattly daeribed by 

\ Dr Wisharl (wlio ioa» teith him nt Ihe 

1 time) in the secoiid part of bis Coni- 

I iienfariUivhichUaaneverbeenprint- 

[ «di nor even accurately translated." 

" The shock suddenly imparled to 

Kb high-strung heart bad nell nigh 

IdUed Montrose oa the spot. His 

ekaplaia, Dr Wiihart, who had joined 

kirn in that city, and was at his side 

when be received the dreadful nevB, 

fttala that be fainted, and fell down 

in the midst of bis attendants, all his 

{I'mfti hteoming riyid, aa if life bad Icfl 

tiin. When restored to bin senses, he 

tirokt out into ihe most paaionate ei- 



prtuiotis of grief. " 

»Now, let it be 
ui Grant, occurs 
mysteriously que 
work written by : 
n/erence to Wit 
and sometimes t 



James Grant's, 1868. 

" Dr Wisharl, who was then a 
chaplain to a regiment of the Scots bri- 
gade, and was with Ihe Marquis nhen 
Charles's death was announced to him, 
has minutely described his emotions. 

" Stunned and overwbehncd by a 
catastrophe so slarlHng, the blood 
rushed back upon his heart; his limbs 
became rigid, and be sank upon the 
floor of the chamber, completely sense- 
less, OS one who waa dead. When 
restored by the exertions of hb terri- 
6ed attendants, he burst into incoherent 
expressions of grief aad rage." 



Now, let it be observed, the above reference to Dr Wiflhart, 
lUi Grant, occurs in the ven/ same page (346), wherein he so 
lysteriously quotes Dr Wishart's Latin title-page, as a " small 
'Work written by him (Montrose) in Latin," without the slightest 
■re/erence to Wiakarl t Sometimes he blumlers our history, 
and sometimes turns blunders of ours (wliich we had subse- 
quently corrected), into history. For example, — the battle of 
Bowden-h ills, where the Marquis of Newcastle, and Licutenant- 
Oeneral King, wore opposed to the Scots under Leven, is 
noticed in history. But we happened to discover an 
Qfti document in the Montrose charter-room, proving (a 
unknown before), that Montrose himself chanced to be 
I present {without a command), and that he had pro- 
louuccd belli Newcastle and General King to be " slow." 
slobbering haste (having four of our works to 
;le with), our parasite actually makes Montrose pronounce 
of hifl idol King Charles, who was not there at all ! — 



NOTE ON GRANT S MONTROSE, 



Our Narrative, 1850 and 1856. 
" We now know, that, at the battle 
0/ BowdenhiUi, near Sunderland, upou 
Sunday S4IA March \Ui, Montrose 
WM attending that illustrious but ua- 
lucceaaful commander, William Ca- 
Teadiali, first Manjuis of Newcastle, 
and inciting him la an initanC and 
degperate rnaet. Upon that occasion 
it vBi that he pronounced both New- 
castle, and his Lieutenant- General, 
King, to be ' alow.'" [Tbia we gave 
aa a fact " new to history."] 



But our literary conveyancer more frequently adopts a blun- 
der, than makes one. For instance, after the victory of Kil- 
syth : — 



James Grant'i, 1858. 
•' On the 24(A March he [Mon- 
trose] was at the battle or encounter 
of Sowden-hitU, near Sunderland, 
when attending the Marquis of New- 
cantle. TTiere he frequently urged him 
to charge; and indignantly declared, 
that he, and even the King, were too 
ihio in their manteuvrea." fThia 
reads in Grant aa if n discovery of hit 
own ; and so it is in one ret!pcct.J 



i 



Oar Narrative, 1840. 

"At Botlneell coraplimentary ad- 
dresses poured in from all quarters of 
Scotland, and were presented to him 
by special commissioner*. Moreover, 
there came in person to declare their 
loyalty and ofier their services, the 
Marquis of Douglas," &c. " Thus 
was he now publicly acknowledged as 
the King's representative, and suddenly 
found himself the centre of a court" 

" The SOD of Lord Nnpier was sent 
Dpon a yet more imporlonl mission ; 
namely, to take possession of Linlith- 
gow and Edinburgh, according to 
written orders, of which Ihc original is 
still preserved by hia represenintive. 
The instructions are addressed to (he 
Master 0/ Napier and Colonel Na- 
thaniel Gordon," &c. " These olE- 
ccrs are commanded to take along 
with them ' 500 horsemen and 600 
dragoons,' and to proceed, " &c. 
" They are next desired to send a 
trumpet or drum with a summons to 
the Magistralea of Edinburgh," kc. 



James Grant 



: 1858. 



"i4(Bortu'ri/,he/DunrfAi>n»e//' in- 
deed the Lieutenant of the King, and 
the centre of a tittle court, which was 
daily increasing. Many men of the 
highest rank in Scotland were honrly 
joining him. The chief of these were 
William, elevcnlb Earl of Angus, and 
first Marquis of Douglas," &c. 



" From thence he sent 600 horse 
and 500 dragoons, under Lieutenant- 
Colonel Sir Niithaiiiel Gordon and 
the Afaslcr of Napier, to ' take id ' 
the city of Edinburnh, obtain a sab- 
sidy, and demand the surrender or 
exchange of prisoners. Sumnumed 
by a kettle-drummer, the Covenant- 
ing garrison in the caatle and dty im- 
mediately released Lndorick, Earl of 
Crawford," &c. 



PUBUSHED BY MESSES EODTLEDGE. 



Oar /farralive ISiO. 
" Thii was B happy miasion for 
foaug Nnpier. From the prison of 
linlitbgow he released his vlfe, to 
whom be was devotedly attached, his 
Tenerable father, his two sisteis, and 
hia brother- in -lav, Sir George Stir- 
ling. The }'outh, for whose escape 
they had been thus immured, now 
rtCunud to them, after the lapse of 
three mon ths, df 1A« A«<i</ 0/ a (AdUMitc/ 
Cavaliert." 



Jamet Oram's, 18S8. 
" At Linlithgow, the Master of 
Napier relie»ed bis father, the aged 
Lord of Alerchiston ; his wife, the 
Mistress of Napier ; bia sisters, and 
bis brother-JD-kw, with others, mak- 
ing In all ]30 restored captives, with 
whom he and Colonel Gordon (juard- 
ed hy thtir 1000 horte) rttarntd tier- 
rily to the camp of Montrose," Sc 



I 






I 



That MoiitroBe bad fumiahed liia nephew, and Colonel 
Nathaniel Giordon, with precise written instructions upon thia 
intereBtiug occasion, was uiiknoicn. Wisbart does not record 
the fact. We found the original document, signed by Mon- 
trose, in the Napier charter-chest, and published a /ir-wmiVfi of 
It. All these important particulars Grant finds it convenient 
to auppresa. Now, mark 1 We had misread the old writing. 
" Ane hundred," we had misread "Jive hundred." Hence a 
blunder in our " Life and Times of Montrose," 1840. But when, 
miheequetitly, we came to publish the document itself, in 1850, 
ftod again in 1856, we corrected our blimder, and gave it ac- 
curately, — " one hundred horse, and one hundred dragoons," 
Such A luxury as one l/iousand mounted soldiers, Montrose 
never possessed in all bis campaigns, Tlie adoption of this 
blunder proves, that Grant does not merely avail himself of 
the family documents, discovered and first published by us, but 
that he is the slavish parasite ofonr text ; for, in this instance, 
onr text was blundered, but the document was published ac- 
curately. Now, what is Gram's foot-note of authority for 
this? As usual, the siugle cabalistic word " Wishart," — who 
doea not record llt^/act at all! Nor has Wishart any such expres- 
Bions, as " found himself the centre of a little court," These 
are directly transferred from our page. This is not the only 
mi«take occurring in our " Life and Times of Montrose," 1840, 
the adoption of which by Grant (notwithstanding our correc- 
tion of the error in gubsequent editions), proves how oblivious 
that statement of his, in his Affidavit to Chancery (19th 




NOTE ON GBANTS MONTROSE. 

paragraph), " I deny that I made any use of the ' Life aud 
Times of Montrose,' 184IJ," ■whicb work, indeed, he never names 
throughout the whole of his volume, At one time we had 
not discovered the period when the Countess of Montrose 
died : — 



Our Narralive, 1840. 
" Montrose's tivo tena, the youngest 
of whom was bom about the begin- 
ning of 1633, constitulcd liU n-hole 
family. Of their mother it ia re- 
markable that ni) notice is to be met 
Kitli, so fiir as I have been able to 
diicoTer, either during hi« public 
career or after his death. Slie is not 
mentioned by Wishart, Guthry, or 
Spalding ; and in the Diary of the 
Lord Lyon, Sir James Balfour, which 
contains a copious obituary of the 
nobility during the period of Mon- 
trose's history, the name of the Coun- 
len iJ nel to be discovered. Nor is 
sha noticed by Sir Thomas Hope in 
hii ' Diary,' Sec. Probnbly this lady 
died toon after yiVrnp hirth to her 
gecond child. It can be ascertained, 
with tolerable certainty, that her 
husband Cret left, homo to travel on the 
Continent in the year 1633: and pcr- 
hapi this WAS immediotelt/ ajler he had 
been deprived of kis coitaori, who cer- 
I.ainly did not accompany him abroad," 



The exact coincidence between the jihraseohgy and senti- 
ment of these sentences, alone would suffice to detect the source 
from which Grant had horrowed. But he lias turned into a 
positive etatement of fact, — for the sake of concocting a whole 
sentimental chapter, entitled " Lady Magdalene's death," — 
that which we, in 18i0, had only conjectured. Now, unfor- 
tunately for Grant, the mistake had been corrected by our 
subsequent discovery of a document proving that the Countess 
did not die until the year 104fi. And when that awkward 
fact is point'f'd to, in our .-t^ffan'/ to Clmncery, we are met 



s Granfa, 1858, 
" The most bitter ecclesiastieal 
chroniclers of the suSurings and 
trimuphs of Presbytery — those who 
in after life never failed to pour a 
torrent of venom and scurrility on the 
memory of Montrose — have tolall;/ 
omitted to mention, even once, lit name 
of hit Counteai. For this, perhapt, 
her early death may in some measure 
account. After having three children 
— Lord GrBbam, nftorwurda Earl of 
Kincardine, who died in the campaign 
of 1645 ; James, who became second 
Marquis of Montrose ; aniLurd Ro- 
bert Graham, — die died at Kinnaird. 
This event occurred soon after the 
birth of the last ; and had no doubt a 
great effect in forming the Aiture 
career of her husband, then only in 
his twenty-first year. Grief for her 
Inn induced him to leave Scotland." 



I 



PUBLISHED BY MESSRS ROUTl.EDGE. 



Ixi 



in the 21st paragraph of Grant's Affidavit, with this non mi 
ricordo answer, viz. " / do not now recollect my authority far 
the fact [the Countess's early death] stated in paragraph 27 of 
the said Plaintiff's affidavit ; but I could not have taken it from 
the said " Life and Times;" as in my work I state, in the 
passage referred to, that the Countess had three children, 
whilst in the Plaintiff's work, in the passage referred to, he 
states that she had bnt two." The " authority," for the adop- 
tion of a mistaken fact, could hardly be any other than that 
of the author who alone had committed the mistake : and as for 
I Grant's triumphant appeal to that other fact, of his having 
recorded three instead of two children, that may chance to 
satisfy a Vice-Chanceilor, but not the public. A perusal of 
the very work he professes to have made no use of, our " Life 
and Times of Montrose," 1840, could also provide him with the 
fact of the tki-ee children; for, at p. 409, of that same work 
of ours, will be found this corrective note: — " I h&d fonnerly 
\ stated that Montrose had only two sons, the eldest, who died 
, at Grordon Castle in 1645, and the one now named. This was 
the general understanding, and is so stated in tlie Peerages. 
I have since discovered, from the ' Caledonian Mercury,' of 
date 1661, that, at the second funeral of Montrose in that year, 
the chiel mourners were the then Marquis, and kia brother Lord 
, Bobert." 

Another amusing specimen of Grant's " immense labonr," in 

L writing an original hfe of Montrose, from his cradle to his 

|, grave, " principally" from a mde translation of Wishart's wars, 

B the following : — We had discovered in the Montrose charter- 

kroom the original commission from Charles II. to Montrose, 

1 1649. This document we did not print, but only illustrated 

or text with extracts from it. In our " Life and Times of 

L Montrose," 1840, and in that work alone, we had erroneously 

L conjectured that the commission was all in the hand-writinjf 

J of Charles II. himself. A closer inspection satisfied us that 

I this was a mistake, and we did not repeat it in our subse- 

Iqnent editions. Grant, without the slightest reference to our 

■discovery of the document, or to our work, gives the substance 

tof the commission from our tejct, and turns our haalt/ coryec- 

into positive history ofhin o%tm ! — 



'I 



Uii 



NOTE ON U RANTS MONTROSE, 



James Granl's, 1858. 
" Nevertheless, we nre conatrained 
to admit that on reflection Charles II., 
«»hii»e idea* of integrity were never 
ver; strict, was not unwilling to treat 
with both parties at the iaiae time ; 
and thus, on tlie ilk day of Afarck 
1649, he mruU out, entirely with ftu 
otiti hand, an apipU eaviniiuian for a 
Caplaio-general and Licvlmanl-go- 
rernor of the kingdom of Scotland, 
conferring all the [powers of levying 
trpopt at hame and abroad, enfordng 
the ciiiil law, besloiL-ing kniyhlhood, 
and other rights; and ihis renewed 
patent of militar; rank ho delivered 
to the Marquis of Montrose." 



Our Narrative, 1840. 
" In the charter-cheat of the Mon- 
trose family, there is yet preserved 
an original commission Irom him 
{Charles II.)" &c., (in which) " We 
do by these presents Dame, constitute, 
ordain, and authorise you, the said 
James Marquis of Montrose, to be 
otir Lieatenant-govemor and Captain' 
general of all our forces raised or to 
be raised in ourkingdora ofScotland.,' 
His Miijesty then proceeds to confer 
tho most ample powert for the Uvy- 
iay o/forcen, both abroad and at home, 
and for making laws, ordinances, and 
proclamations, in prosecuting the war 
■gainst his rebellious subjects, with 
the entire command and governorship 
of all Scotland, and the power of be- 
llowing kni^lilhood upon ivhomsoever 
he tnigbt think worthy of the hononr. 
The deed is eertilied in the usual 
manner, ' asgivennnderoursign-ma- 
nual and privy signet, at the Hague, 
Ae fourth day of 3f arch, in the first 
year ofourreign.' This commission, 
which occupies a folio sheet of parch- 
ment, has very miirh the appearance 
of being all written by the hand of 
Charlu 21. himself." 



Here, then, are three blundera, transferred by Grant to hiB 
own pages, from separate pages of our " Life and Times of 
Montrose," 1840, a work to which he nevor refers, and his obli- 
gations to which he indignantly repudiates I The fact is, how- 
ever, that he bad long been acquainted with that work, and had 
disingenuoUBly used it for other purposes than the concoction 
of his Memoirs of Montrose. In the 27th paragraph of his 
Affidavit, he most irrelevantly parades a voluminous catalogue 
of his own literary comijositions, as to the originality of which 
it is not our present object to inquire. Among the works of 
fiction enumerated, we find " The Scottish Cavalier," a his- 
torical romance, published some years ago, but subaequenl to 



PDBLISHED BY MESSRS HOUTLEDGE. IxUI 

OUT publication of the " Life and Times," 1840. The motto 
attached to one of the chapters of this romance is the follow- 
ing Terse : — 



Heard je not ! heard ye not 1 how that whirlwind, the Gael, 
Through Lochabcr swept down from Lochneas to Loch Eil, — 
And the Canipbellg, to ue«t them in battle -arruy, 
Like the billow tamo on, — and were broke like its apray I 
LoDg, long shall our war-song exult in that day. 

laa Lom, 



I As the bard of Keppoch, Ian Lom, only wrote t» Gaelic, 
is Terse, as thus given, without marks of quotation, at the 
head of a chapter in Grant's romance, necessarily passes for 
a tranahlion by himself. It is, however, the firet verse of a 
short poem written by ourselves, in illustration of the battle 
of Inverlochy. It is a very free version of a translation which 
had been sent us by a friend, of a svppoaed effusion, in Gaelic 
verse, of the traditional Highland bard. Grant had extracted 

•k {without the slightest acknowledgment) from p. 298 of our 
j* Life and Times of Montrose," 1840, inhere alone it ivaa then 
printed. But tliis was scarcely stealing, it was only picking ; 
and of course is now noticed merely by way of illustration. 

In the Grant-Ronthdge preface of 1858, Grant's work is osten- 
tatiously proclaimed to be, besides its other excellencies, the 
only military biography of Montrose. But in the whole liis- 
torj, and performance of this literary speculation, between a 
professional author and the cheap London publishers, there is 
not a symptom to be discovered, either of the spirit, attributes, 
or knowledge of a soldier, unless, indeed, it be the practice of 
looting. This military author cannot fairly be said to have 
looked at Montrose except through us, or to have fought one 
of bis battles except from behind our back. In our narrative 
of the battle of Kilsyth, wc happened to use the appropriate 
simile, " The Highlanders," &c,, " up the glen like a herd of 
vwuntain cats." The ruthless Eoutledger bags our cats, but 
iuses them for the skirmishing at Fyvie, where they are not 
I the least appropriate, thus, — " The ftry BighlanderB," Ac. 
wnahed like a herdoftvildcats," Ac. Curious coincidences these. 
, mark how he follows in our wake, " like a shark." (as 




ixiv 



NOTE ON GliANT S MONTROSE, 



a London journal truly described Grant's modus operandi,) at 
the battle of Inverlochy. Wc- have only space for short extracts. 
The parallel expressions, indicated by italics, are not in any 
translations of Wishart, but are transferred from our " Life 
and Times of Montrose," 1840, with what barely amounts to a 
colourable difference : — 



Out Narralive. 1840. 
" ArgjOo had taken refuge in Dum- 
birton and Hnseiiealh, where General 
BailUe joined him nbout the end of 
December. Here it was concerted to 
mrroiind and dctlroy tlie loyalist)" &c. 
" To make sure of thdr object, Baillic 
marched through Angus for Perth," 
&c. 

" He appears to have had somt 
idea of attacking the Corenantiog 
forces at IiKernesa," &c. " but the 
intelligence broaght by the bard of 
Keppoch altered Monlroat'ii plan," 
Sec. " A great proportion of the 
northern body were inexperienced 
recruits, end their commander, Sea- 
forth, WHS Q iraaerer," &c. 

" The mountains were covered leilh 
snoiii," &c. They sought their way 
up the rugged bed of the Zbr^, across 
the tteep ridges of the airful Corry- 
arich, now plunging into the valley of 
the rising Spey, now crossing the wild 
mountains from Glen Roy to the 
Spean, and slaid not until from the 
■kirts of Ben Nevis, they saic before 
them, under a clear frosty sky, the 
get itoodleas shores of Loch Eil, and 
the/rorcnitig towers of Inverlochy." 



James Grant's, 1858. 
" The forces of iwii(imon(-Geii«roI 
Baillie were approaching by a rout* 
through Angiu, accenting to a schema 
laid by that ot&cer and Argyle daring 
a meeting at Roseneath, to surround 
Montrose and hisfiUowers." 



" Montrose now altered his Jirat 
plans, which aimed at the storming of 
Inverness,'' &c. 



" In front of Montrose, George 
Mackenzie, Earl oiSeaJorth, a Kaver- 
ing noble," &e. " occupied Inverness," 
&c. 

" Marching along the banks of the 
Thrf, Montrose ascended ihe moun- 
tMOS of Lairie-Theirard, and wheel- 
ing off by the stupendous Corryarrick 
in Laggan, where the whole country 
from that mountain's glistening sum- 
mit down to the bed of the fur\ 
Speij, was a while desert of snow, 
crossed the long winding valley where 
the Buaigb rushee through a cbi 
of rocks to the Spean," 8ic. " From 
thence, at the head ofhis clans, jeilh- 
oul a vwmenfs halt for food or rest, 
he swejit round the base of Ben- 
rinnes | and at twelve o'clock on the 
nij;ht of the Ibt February, sow inhere, 
by the shores of Locheil, far down in 
the valley below, the red watch-fires 



PUBIJSHED BT HESSRS ROUTLEDGE. 



Ixv 



Omr Narrahve, 1840. 



"TTie march by which Montrose 
OTcrUok Ihem, was one of the most 
•xtnordinar; he ever achieved." 



I " The minttrtl depsrted to Uke hia 

' atation on the neif;hbouriiig heigbu 

«f Inrerlochy, from whence he watcA- 

«f the event he was (o immortalize in 



long. 



Jama Granl'a, 1858. 
of the Cumpbells were glimmering, 
by the uld grey wall* of lite cattU of 
Invertochy," &c. '" The red winter 
sun of the morning of the 2d Febru- 
ary (CandlemBA day) 1G46, as he rose 
above the shonlderlof BenevJs, and 
ahone upon the mhile shores of tJie Eil. 
and the dark romparfjof Inverlochy, 
saK tlie tnov", yet btoodUsa," &c. 

" Montrose and his foUowers had 
accomplished a militarj' movement 
which" &c. "has no parallel in the 
annali of Scotland, or any other 
country." 

" Harp in hand, the bard awaited 
tht itsrie of that conflict he was yet (u 
rmialni in long." 



The very particular incident of the bard is not alluded to by 
iWishart. Then, the identity of tho phraseology and aenti- 
rtaient (not in Wiahart), proves that this also ia all derived 
■'from our narrative of 1840, to which there is not the filighteet 
|[Xeference in the whole of Grant's volume. 

Under our generalship, too, he fights the battle of Al/ord. 
IBut we can here only atfurd to quote the concluding para- 

r.ph:- 



Our Narratttie, 1840. 
" The battle of Al/ord uwu gained, 
but dtarly wu that victory purchased 
hj Montroae," &e. " The knightly 
pIuM, of llie too forward heir of 
Hantly. fell in the duil. to rise no 



Jamet Grant'a, 1868. 
'^ Al/ord was won ; bntwilhaA^auj 
lo>i to Montrose ; for there /ell the 
brave Lord Gordon, the second cava- 
her in Scotland," &c. And the pride 
o/the cavaHere/M under the hoo/s of 
his charger, a brealhiess corpse," Etc. 



tin his Affidavit, Grant depones, — " I commenced the writing 
of my work towards the end of June 18fi2 and finished it on 
the 20tb of January 1853 [aeven montlia f] ; except the revuMf 
of the same herein after mentioned [1857], and except | 



on 

3 



Ixvi 



NOTE ON GRANT S MONTEOSE, 



preface, which was written in 1858." " The principal work 
which I used in writing my said work, [a minute biography of 
Montrose from his cradle to his grave, including hia life at col- 
lege, early marriage, (&c, I] waa tJte History of the Wars in Scot- 
land, printed in 1720, being in fact the best translation of 
Wiehart" I In fact, it is about the worst ; and, moreover, the 
wars it records, — the popular narrative of which ware, too. 
Grant derives from our text, and not from that translation, — 
no more furnishes a domestic life of Montrose, than the Lon- 
don Gazette does that of Wellington. Wishart, no doubt, 
records his victories with minute accuracy ; and him of course 
we followed, in his original ; and not merely through the old 
translations, some gross blunders occurring in which we were 
at critical pains to correct ; of which correction Grant takes the 
benefit, without any notice of the fact. But while looking to 
Wishart., (the substance of whose work, indeed, is to be found 
in all the histories of Scotland,) we neither confined ourselves 
to his incidents, nor tied ourselves to his narrative. For in- 
stance, in the rude translation of 1720 (Grant's "principal" 
authority I) the fall of Lord Gordon is thus drily recorded : — 
" The Lord Gordon, after the battle was won, rushing fiercely 
into the thickest of them, received a shot through his body- 
by the conquered and flying enemy, and feU down dead." 
Grant's emphatic and romantic notice of the same incident, is 
no more taken from this than from the Book of Lamentations, 
It is one, of many more instances in the Eoutledge volume 
than we can afibrd to extract here, which remindi one rather 
of a cateran's ingenuity, in disguising the cow he has lifted, 
than of the generous and gentlemanly spirit that belongs to the 
profession of letters, and marka the independence of genius. 
And is it such original ideas, and " immense labour" as this, 

I that can justify the announcement, written by Grant last year, 
and published by the Messrs Routledgo, that, — " The Pub- 
lishers believe, that, for the first time, they are enabled to bring 
forward a popular and complete military history, of the great 
Cavalier, and of the wars of his times," — as if nothing popular, 
complete, or military, had been published on the subject, be- 
tween the epochs of Dr Wishart, 1647, and James Grant, 
zzzz 



PUBLISHED BY MESSBS KOUTLEDGE. 



Ixvii 



are to " congrahilale Mr Grant upon this volume, which is, 
certainly, the most successful of his many successful publica- 
tione, and will euhance his literary reputation far and wide" ? 
Oh t Boutledge. Why, had you only asked our sanction, or 
our publisher's permission (whose pecuniary interests tbia in- 
iraded), for your trading speculation, we might have granted 
you fair and honourable terms, and even have wTitten a puff 
for you in poetry besides, to the tune of " Bonnie Dundee. " 



'Tiras MontrOflC to his Mistress, in loyalty's nsme, 

From bis svord aad his pen, promis'il glory and fomo ; 

But glory more famous our country may vaunt, 

In the sword otJame» Graham, SJid the pen ofJamel Grant. 

Come fill up my cup, come lill up my can. 

The sword is llie Grnbtim's, — but Grant's is tho pen ; 

Eftb-sliakelia may rant, onil of Covenant cant, 

Here's the sirord of James Graham, and the pen ol'James (iraul. 

' My mint is " the million," — a penny per line. 

So, dig and bo dingy, Montrose shall be mine ; 

You may rummage Creation, and write by the rood. 
But all pages are mine, from page One to — Page Wood.' 
Come fill up my cup, come fill up my can. 
The sword is the Grohara's, — but Grant's is the pen ; 
Brother Rolt he may rant, nnd of Copyright cant. 
Here's the aword of James Graham, and the pen of James Grant. 




In our separate review of Sir Page Wood's judgment, a 
much fuller exemplification will be found. For, indeed, wo 
are not aware, that another instance could be pointed to, in 
modern authorship, where tho unauthorised transference, from 
tho pages of one author to the pages of another, of all the es- 
sential component parts of an original liistorical biography (in 
» case where the idea of actual abridgment is altogether ex- 
oluded and disclaimed), namely, biographical design, arrange- 
ment, sentiments, collateral incidents of minor importance, 
new materials from original family papers, the general webof tho 
text, and occasional peculiar phrases, is so complete and whole- 
sale, and so flimsily disguised, as in Memoirs of Montrose by 



Ixviii 



NOTE ON GRANTS MONTROSE. 



James Grant. What if tbis liberty, even to tho amount above 
exemplified, and no more, had been taken with Scott's Life of 
Napoleon ? "VVbat would the " Black Hussar of Letters" have 
said and done ? The copyright of Lockliart's Life of Scott is 
now veBted in the most honourable of publishers, and sturdiest 
of legislators. What if this decanting trick, precisely in the 
same measure, and no more, had been perpetrated upon that? 
We verily believe, tho Black magnum, — mleriore notd Falemi 
— ^would have risen in its place in Parliament, and " named" 
the sly absorbent phial I If, indeed, that highly prized species 
of property called Ct^right, can be, in this manner, lost to 
one, and constituted in another, it is little better, after all the 
toil of a Talfourd, and tho law of a Story, and a Wood,' than 
a kind of dinner tenure known among schoolboys, and termed 
OobblerigM, which the bad boy may achieve, by spitting into 
the good boy's platter. 

' Id a question of literary pincy, Telalive to an elementary worb, entitled " The 
Guide to Science," Vice-ClmDcellar Wood laid down rtTUia prineiplea at Ibe law 
uf copyriglil, wliicli we liero quote from the rubric of tlie rppDiied case : — 

I. He first laid it down, tlial, ereu aa rej^nU a work liaviug no pretenmaas to 
originalUj/ in tkc tuhjtet, or materiali, — " The reduclion of questions ao collected, 
with ioeh answers, vitder certain iatdi, and in a leientiHc form, is mjicirnl to eon- 
rtitvtl on ei-iyiKol fcork, of wliicili tlie eopi/riyhl trilt be iiroliel/d." 

3. " But another person may orii}i«aU auather work in the same general form, 
promdid he does so Trom his ova Toourea, and makes the work he so originales, a 
iBorJ: of kiM Bieii, by jlii o«n labour md ind^ulry bestowed upon it." 

9. " In determining whether an injunction should be ordered, the ijnestiaD, where 
the matter of tbe Plaintiff's work is not orir^naf, i», how far an un/air or undue «h 
hai been made u/thc icoik." 

4. ■■ If, iuitcad of searching into the ooinmon Bourcra, and obtaining your aubjcot- 
malter from Otenee, you acail t/onnel/ of tlie laliotirt of gour prtdteeiaor, tdoft, tat 
arrangenent, and questions, or adopt tliem with ■ coloaralle varuilian, it is an 
UUgilirMite au," 

5. " FalBely to deti^ tliat you have copied, or taken ciajr idea, or language, from 
another work, — itronj iii(/iaitioa of aHimui farandL" 

(See JanvMv.i/cH/ifun, decided by Vice-Chanccllor Wood, July 9th, 1S57;Kay 
and Johnson's Casea in Clianetrry, vol. iii. p, 703,) 



CONTENTS 



THE FIRST VOLUME. 



I 



Dedication, ...... Pttge t 

ISTRODUCTOBY Matter, .... vii-xlvi 

Nore ON Grast's Montrose, , ■ . xlrii-bcriii 



Iftf/iminory Btinew of False History, and Vulgar Errort re- 
latin ff to Dundee. 

1. Lord Macaulay and John Brown, . . 3-16 

S, Mr Jolin Hill Burton's Characteristics of Dundee, . 16-37 

8. Bishop Bumel'e Characteri9tic8 of Dundee — Lord Mai^aulay's 
CharacteristicH of Bishop Burnet — Tbe Bishop's Charac- 
teristics of himself, .... 40-50 

4. Wodrow and his Army of Martyrs, . 51-120 

5. Real Characteriatica of Claverhouae — True History of tho 

Death of John Brown, .... 120-146 

6. Patrick Walker the Pedlar's version of the Death of John 

Brown, ...... 146-158 

7. Sir Walter Scott's Characteriatica of Claverhouae — Conclu- 
^m eion of Rcvienr, 158-173 

^1 PAKT 

^^^1 Tki: Houdam Manuscript. 

^^^Bvliminary Afcount qfi't, .... 173-4 

^^^fcirth and 

t 



SKrTtON I. 

lirth and Parentage of .lohn Graham of Clavnrhoune — Kin 
lomf nnd Ahrrvad — ilia AdveiHurp irilh thn 



JXI CONTENTS. 

PriDce of OraDge at the Battle of Seoeflv — Hia Return lo 
Scotland — His Appointment to CommaDd a Troop io the 
Royal Horae Guards, . . . Page 175-186 

Section II. 
Review of the Slate of the Cbnrch in Scotland, and of the lead- 
ing characters connected theren'ith, from the Reformation 
to the ReBtoratioD, .... 186-226 

Section III. 
Administration of Lauderdale and liothes in Scotland, from the 
first Tumults on tbe placing of Curates in the Churches of 
the Expelled Ministers, to the Murder of Archbishop 
Sharp, ...... 226-258 

StCTlON IV. 
The Murder of Archbishop Sharp, 



258-267 



Section V. 
Insurrection following the Murder of the Primate — Mass John 
King — The Defeat of Claverbouae at Druraclog — Countew 
of Loudon — The Fanatics Defeated at Glasgoir — MasB 
David Williameon — Measures to Suppress the Rebellious 
• — The Fanatical Rebellion in Scotland encouraged by 
Shaftesbury and tbe English Whigs — Fragments of Mr 
Charles K. Sharpe's Manuscripts communicated by Mrs 
Bedford — His own Statement of his intention to Write 
the Life of John Graham, Viscount of Dundee — Hia 
Character of Dundee — Calumnious Exaggerations and 
Superstitions of the Fanatical Whigs, . . 267-'28'l 

Section VL 
Defeat of tbe Fanatics at Bothwell Bridge, and immediate con- 
sequents thereof to the Army of Martyrs — The " Bluidy 
Banner" of the Covenant — Executions of Kid and King, 
Cameron and Cargill, Isabel Alison and Marion Harvie — 
Outrages justifying these severities, , . 284-313 

Section VII. 
Notes of Afiairs in Scotland — Traits of the Times, and Sketches 

of Character from the passing of the Teat Act in 1681 lo 



CONTENTS. Ixxi 

the Death of Charles the Second in 1685 — End of the 
Fragments by Mr Sharpe. — Supplementary addition, from 
the Queensberry Papers, to Mr Sharpens notice of the 
Death and Character of Charles the Second — Letters from 
Rothes to Queensberry, illustrative of the leading States- 
men, and Political Factions, towards the close of the Reign 
of Charles the Second, from the Queensberry Papers — " A 
pleasant Story about Duke Hamilton," from Rothes to 
Queensberry, .... Page 313-388 



ERRATA. 

Page 6.% line 17 from bottom, /or wen read was 
... 167, ... 8 from bottom, /or antitypes reeuf antipodes 
... 171, ... 4 from bottom,/or inculcate read inculcated 
... 172, ... 13 from top,ybr/orer rftui/ora 

... 176, ... 7 of note 1,/or Miss Grahame Grahame of Duntroon rtad 
Miss Stirling Grahame of Dnntroon 



ILLUSTRATIONS 



IN VOLUME FIRST. 



1. Portrait of Dundee from the contemporary Engraving 

BY Williams, .... FronUspieee 

2. The Armorial Shield of Dundee, . . Title-page 

3. " The Inimitable Virago," by C. K. Suarpe — Introduc- 

tion^ ..... Page xvi 

4. Facsimile of the Title-page, and Fly-leaf, op Mon- 

trose's Pocket Bible, with his Handwriting there- 
on, — Introduction^ . • • . • xxx 

5. Facsimile of Montrose's Autograph on the Title-page 

of Camden's Britannia — Introduction^ . . xxxii 

6. Portrait of Charles Kirkpatrick Sharps — Introduction^ xlii 

7. Mr Sharpens Musical Monogram — Introduction^ . xliii 

8. Portrait of Dundee in possession of Graham of Airth, 175 

9. Facsimile of the Autograph of Charles Kirkpatrick 

Sharpe, ...... 280 

10. Facsimile of the Banner carried by the Covenanters 

at Bothwell Bridge, .... 288 



M E M (I li I A I. S 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



PAllT I. 



I'RELIMIMARy REVIEW OF FALSE HI8TORV AND VULGAR ERIIORS, 
RELATING TO DUNDEE, 



Is little more than twenty yeara after the death of 
Hontrose, another Graham, head of an ancient brancli of 
the noble houBC, entered ujKjn the stage of the Scottish 
Troubles, and became, for a brief space, conspicuous iu the 
rapidly shifting scenes that ensued. Him, too, the bitterness 
of polemical enmity, and the mendacity of covenanting re- 
cords, have been even more successful iu excluding from his 
I proper place in the anuals of his country, and the affections 
[ of his couutrymon. Belonging to the same illustrious house, 
\ devoted to the same cause, struggling against the same wild, 
I unj^inary faction of clerical agitators, and by nature im- 
pressed with some of tlie lofty charactoristics of his heroic 
I prototyiw, it was inevitable that Graham of Claverhouse should 
I inherit the storm of fanatical invective and calumny, which 
I 



2 MEMORIALS OF THE 

had pursued the glorious career, and howled around the mur- 
derous scaffold of the greatest of the Grahams. 

But the career of Claverhouse contracts to a point, when 
compared with that of the head of his house. Indeed, it can 
scarcely be supposed to afford sufficient materials for a sepa- 
rate biography. Some \vorthies are proper subjects for a re- 
cord apart, because, while the fountains of their fame serve 
to enliven the dense mazes of the world's annals, the full 
current of their individual renown necessarily seeks an inde- 
pendent channel. Such, for instance, are the lives of great 
literary men, of philosophers, historians, and bards, who had 
acquired social celebrity, and world-wide fame. Could History 
have paused to pick up all those precious crumbs \vhich fell 
from the table of the master of Boswell ? Again, there be 
men belonging especially to histor}^ who are yet proper sub- 
jects for a separate biography. When the public life of a great 
character has been chequered by many instructive vicissitudes, 
varied by many and seemingly inconsistent positions, and in- 
volved in a long labyrinth of political events, his biography 
composes a chapter of history which requires to be studied 
apart. Montrose affords a prominent example of the kind. 
Had the breath of calumny never touched him, had public 
records done him ample justice, still the many phases of his 
eventful life, in which the limit between history and romance 
becomes confounded and lost, would have demanded a special 
record. But Dundee, who glared, crashed, and became extin- 
guished like the levin bolt, may not History herself, in a 
single page, suffice to tell who he was, and what he did, — " to 
whom related, and by whom begot," — ^how lived, how fought, 
how died he ? 

Unfortimately, with regard to Dundee, History has proved 
an incorrigible calumniator. In his case has been reversed 
the ordinary rule in the search for truth. The unprejudiced 
mind, the Christian judgment, the spirit of justice, must here 
eschew the most brilliant and pretentious pages of history, 
and turn, for something like the truth, to a romance or a 
ballad. From Eobert Wodrow, the Scottish martyrologist, to 
Lord Macaulay, the ennobled party historian, who may be 
taken to represent the alpha and omega of the calumnious 



VISCUUNT OF DUNDEK. 3 

f HTJ, Jinked together by a long cLaiu compiiscd of tlie careless 
and the credulous, the virulent and the vulgar, has the me- 
mory of John Graham of C'lavcrhouse been grossly maligned. 
It Becms very neecBsary, therefore, Iwforo proceeding with the 
historical memorials ol' liis Life Jiod Times, to clear away that 
cumbrous accumulation of vulgar errm\ too rashly Banctioned 
hy some greatly Jistiiiguished historians, under which the 
true character of tliis Scottish worthy still lies buried. This 
will best l)e done by a close and nncompromising scrutiny of 
tJie characteristics recorded of him in the most important 
historical compositions published since his time. We say, an 
uncompromising scrutiny. " Bloixly Clavors" owes History 
little respect. He asks a clear stage, and no favimr. 

1. Lord Macaulai/ and John Brown. 

Lord Macauluy, in a very popular history of England, has 
recently presented to the world the most diabolical portrait of 
Dundee that has ever been traced by the pen of genius. From 
the platform of his too attractive page, we shall commence 
this historical survey. He sings of " Jamvs (iraham of Claver- 
honsc ;" but the man's name was John.^ 



ft 



' T\ia reader nrod wnrKly be reminded of PiiifaBsor Ayloun's very kbh 
■■ EuniinklioD of tlte aUleinenla in Mr Maoiulny's Hitior)' of EagUnd, regarding 
John GnhiTD of Claverliuiue, Viaeoiint of DuDileo," >ii|icRded lo the Bcoond 
edition of " Lnjs .if Ilie Soottish Cavulierg," 1B4!). The close detection, the scute 
■rgDQieal, the lellinf( wii, tni] the fine temper of Mr Ayloun'i " Eumituilioti," 
BtiutI aver ronuiia ■ laarel on ilie PiofcHor's brow, and » iliorn in the aide ef the 
hidorian. But when tlie bard of the " EnDcutioo of Monttose," and ilw « Burial 
Hanh uf Dundee," vent foHli to battle with the DiMI popular writer in England 
of tile present lime, his materials ware imperfect, and his researches iucomplele, — 
defecia inevitable, from the narrow limits of liia incidental examination, and tlie 
impiJ gallantry with whicb he auailed his furmidable foe. The few migulM henoe 
■rising, however, affbrd no defence for the hiiitorian, and ofTer no available ebibll 
In the emKnir ,.( the Scotbsli eaTalier. 

" .■item woi the dint the Lwnlerer lent. 
The bulrdlj naron backward bent. 
Itphl baekwani to Ula hone'" tall, 
And bin |>1ani« went •ralt^rlnK on the Rale," 

I " Of Sir Mm-Buiaj'M Jantf Graham (mya Mr Aytoiin), *e know nothing ; nei- 
! llier ha" tlui tminc, iw apiilird to Clavtrlionie, n |)lBce in any arcrrdiled hislorji 



4 MEMORIALS OF TttE 

" The fiery persecution which had raged when he (tlw 
thike of York) ruled Scotland as rice-regent, waxed hotter 
fJian efer from the day on which he l>ecamo Sovereign. Thoso 
shires in which the Covenanters were most niuneroue, were 
given tip to the license of the army. With the army was 
mingled a militia, composed of the most riolent and profli- 
gate of those who called themeolvcs Episcopalians. Pre- 
eminent among the bands which oppressed and wasted these 
unhappy districts, were the dragoons commanded by James 
Graham of Claverhouse. ' The stort/ ran,' that these wicked 
men need in their revels to play at the torments of Hell, and 
to call each other by the names of dex-ils and damned souls. 

■ave hi* own." The blundpr, howeTcr.ii In be found in IVodnv, It.e rouiitiinhodnr 
mlgveiTDroDlbe«ul>j«t. " Jamn Gnhun oT GaverhouH," icrite« ihal Rtperfi- 
«ial fanatic, id the 71b aeclian uf the I »th chaplcr of bis 2d boolf,— " Jama Gnbam 
of CSaverfaonse, with a Dumemun part;/ of tcldicrs," &c Ac. As Lord MicunUv, 
in the paiKage in qnntion, rvlen to no other authority llian Wodrov, we may pi¥. 
nime Eliat be had tnnsfeiTpd Ibe blunder to hi« okd pt^. Under the ProTcoor'a 
eorredioD, hehasaeconiplidied the easy task of ralentljEubslilaungJolla for Juau*, 
ID ■ Bubuquent editioD. Tlic monl hoiteTer remaina. lie canDol delete the mt, 
which hiaori^nal hlnnder afforJi of the iui»er»ble amount of liia own researehaato 
tt great public cbancter, whom he deliberately seta himself to malign. Sir Walter 
Scott fell into the nme mistake, id bis hiatorical note to " The ballad of the battle 
of LwdoD Hill," iu the Minstroldv of ihe Scottish Border ; bat he had detected 
the misnomer bcfurc writing his history, aad hiitorical iwvela. In nuics to a cul- 
lection of ballads, it is pardonable to bane oomuiitted an incojueqacotial cnor of 
ll» kind. But when the ohject is to hold np, hisloricallx and dabmlel;, to Ihe 
abborrence of all poiilerity, a great public character, the exuminatiaa into the 
historj' of the man ought to have been at lean close enough to har* rendered ■ 
niisiKimer ia/niuitJt. One reviewer has helped Lord Uscuitay lo the IToe nam*. 
Paifapa he ma; 6ad himtelf indebted to another for the true fBCla. Close detec- 
tion on the one hand, and perfect docility of correction on the oilier, may gradually 
render this historian's cbronicles u accurate as they are brilliiut. 

> Bow Duenlly, pleaanlly, and confidently, does all tliin flow from the praetiard 
pen of the accomplished historic^ essayist 1 Vet there is not a word of true 
history in all these paragraphs. Lord Micaalay nvB of Dr Johnson, " tlial as 
soon aa he took his pen in hU hand to write for the pnblic, his style became > 
matieally ricioiu : when he wrote for publication, be did hiasenlenees out of Eng- 
lish into Joini«iiMK."^Rfritm of Cniiti't Bonrdl. Our culling critic uke* more 
liberties witli history than ever Johnson did with language. How often does he 
give n3 SlatatUtt for histoiy t 

' The stories which run, are not the truths which those who run may read. 
When such like eKpreasioDi occur in this history, — and they occur very freqoently, 
they indicate the absence of all legilinule authority. 



I 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. h 

The chief of this Tojilict on enrth,' a solilier of diBtinguished 
cciurage, and professional skill, but rapacious and profane, of 
violent temper and obdurate heart, has left a name which, 
wherever the Scottish race is settled on tlie face of the globe, 
is mentioned with a peciilior energy of hatred. To recapitu- 
late all the crimeH hy wliicb this man, and men like him, 
goaded tlic peHsant.ry of the Western Lowlands into madness, 
would be an endless task. A few instances must sufBce ; and 
all these instances shall be taken from the history of a single 
fortnight, — tliat very fortnight in which tlie Scottish Parlia- 
ment, at the urgent request of James, enacted a now law of 
unprecedented severity against dissenters," 

Ere we juiss on ti.i our historian's leading instance (the only 
one which affects Claverliouse),' a word or two of this " pecu- 
liar energy of hatred." 

Violent abuse, increasing in virulence of expression precisely 
in proportion to the vagueness of the accusation, the absence 
of authentic facts, and the lurking consciousness of calumny, 
was always the marked characteristic of those ill-conditioned 
annals of fanaticism which this noble author has honoured too 
liiglily by condescending to follow. The prickly plant of 
covenanting slander, indeed, seems to flourish and flower un- 
der the richness of liis modem culture. But the fountain- 
head of such vulgar viala of wrath, is " the pulpit dmm eccle- 
siaatic." How the verbal " energy of hatred" was jKnired out 
upon the devoted head of Montrose 1 Of course our historian 
in like manner believes, that, " wherever the Scottish race is 
settled on the face of tlie globe," the champion of Charles the 
First is honoured with the same energetic mention that, as 
he assures us, always accompanies the name of the champion 

■ H Tuphet DD oulh," it may be necomsry to explain, in«uia Hell b/hih tarlh. 
Clanrtioiuo is tLiu nki»d to the dignity of SbUid. Out liiMoruiii iiu orefiitly 
m«iMd tliia Mriking [iiuHge in hla Jalett mliliiiii, wlieru il ctaUilB siiii|ily ■■ tlii>> 
Tophat,"— « inaniroH improTeineot. It wiu> MiiwrHuoiw di tdd " nn tmnli ;- Uit 
liit To/ikrI e.>iinot of c<>urw bs uodarabxHl lii iiiouii lVA«r Tu/'litl. 

* Lnrd Miiwuliiy Icbts* il to be infecTpd, from hi* own tmrrtlive, llul all tlie 
erwl iiorin vliich ho liere deriroe from Wodrow, implicate GlaTerhouw ; Ihs Un 
bdn^>. himcvci', that e'cn K'uJiv* only impule* one of Ihcwr iniWnwii In nur lnrri>. 
of Joliii llrown, niunoly ; juid nclimlly ih'iw*, nith regard tii uiioiiicr, liiat 






6 - MEMORIALS OF THE 

of James the Seventh. The beautiful, witty, and sensible 
Queen of Bohemia, \vriting to Montrose in the year 1649, thus 
indicates her lively contempt for that King Cambyses' vein of 
reprobation : — " I doubt not," she says, " but you have seen, 
ere this, the proclamation against Morton and Einnoul, and 
all the adherents of ' that detestable bloody murderer and 
excommunicated traitor, James Grceme !' The Turks never 
called tlic Christians so."* 

But to proceed T^ith Lord Macaulay s leading instance in 
support of that terrible portrait of Dundee. 

" John Brown, a iKX)r carrier of Lanarkshire, was, for his 
singular piety, called * The Christian Carrier.' Many years 
later, when Scotland enjoyed rest, prosperity, and religious 
freedom,' old men who remembered the evil days, described 
him as one well versed in di^dne things, and so peaceable,^ 
that the tyrants could find no otience in him, except that he 
had absented himself from the public worship of the Episco- 
j)aliana. On the Ist of May (1685) he was cutting turf,* when 
he was seized by Claverhouse's dragoons, rapidly examined, 
convicted of nonconformity,^ and sentenced to death. It is 
said, that even among the soldiers it was not easy to find an 
executioner. For the Anfe of the poor man was present. She 

* See the Queen of Bohemia's correspondence with Montroec, printed in the 
Memoirs of Montrose, toI. ii. p. 720 ; Edinburgh, Tliomas G. Stevenson, 1856. 

Bishop Russell, in his excellent and most temperate « History of the Church in 
ScotUnd," (1834), justly observes: — «* In the conduct of the rigid Covenanten>, 
there is nothing more remarkable than their disposition to dander, and the reck- 
less intrepidity with which they scattered around them the most atrocious calum- 
nies." — Vol. ii. p. 264. 

s From King William's Massacre of Glencoe, and warrants under his own hand to 
apply the torture of the boot, in the severest degree, to compel suspected State 
delinquents to speak out. We shall prove this. 

* He figures in the Portcous Roll of criminals, and in the list of rebels /ir<;(ta^ 
for not appearing to stand their trial. 

^ He was cutting across the mosses to escape from the military. 

* No such thing. He was convicted of obstinately refusing to take the oath 
abjurin;; a recent proclamation of war against the Government, and incitement 
to assaflMuation ; and of violently renouncing his allegiance to the reigning Kin^, 
in the face of the Kind's troopi: aleo bullet* were found in his house, and trea$on- 
able f*ai>en; all this before his execution. Immediately o/iTtfr his execution, his 
cave of vonceiilinent under ground was discovered, containing swords and pistols. 



^^^^^^P VlSa^UNT UK DUNUILE. 7 

^^V led one little etiild by iJie Land : it was eaay to sue' tliat she 

^^H was about to give birth to anotlier ; and even those wild and 

^^H hard-hearted men who iiitknamed one another Beelzebub and 

^^H Apollyou,* shrank from the great wickednees of butchering 

^^1 her husband before her face. The |>risoDer, incanwliile, raised 

^^H above Imneelf hy the near approach of eternity, prayed loud 

^^H and fervently, as one inspired, till Claverbouse in a I'ury »hot 

^^H bim dead. It was reported by credible witnesses, that Ibo 

^^H widow cried out in her agony, — ' Well, Sir, well, the day oJ' 

^^H reckoning will conio;' and that the mun:fem' replied. ' To man 

^^H I can answer for what I have done, and, as for God, I will 

^^H take liim into mint! own hand.' Yet it was rumoured, that, 

^^H even on his scared conscience and adamantine heart, tbe dy- 

^^H iiig ejaculations of his victim made an impression which was 

^^H never ctTaced."' 

^^H Wodrow is the sole authority to wliich Lord Macuulay re- 

^^H fers, for his own implicit reliance upon the truth of a story as 

^^H improlMible, on the very face of it, as any calumny that ever 

^^^H ■ Niit *a fay to Bre ; f<ir tlie fuialical accouiiu AiSTer as lo tliesc dcUlla ; it wu 

^^^H riKy tn uj', however. 

^^^H • Professor AjInuD Iim nWile greii' fu" of this : — " Mr MicuuUy, lin«ever, gopa 

^^^H bsyond Wndrcw p*>n, in iitinuleneaB ; fur, in ■ subeeqnant pkngrapli, lie parlicu- 
^^^1 iBraes the very namea which were u*«d, na those u! liedidiub vid Ayullg-m ! He 
^^^H might with equal proprict]- linve adopted the phnwology of inrieiit I'intol, ind 
^^^1 t,nie\} infonned lu, that llie Scottiih inmle of military acrost wiu,— • How uav, 
^^^^ MrykiilopiiUiitV^—Ai/loMH'i KraniKation of Maeaalag. 

^^^H ■ " MiBtory nf EoglauJ, frini tUe accewion of Jatnea II. : by Thoma* BabiDgluii 

^^^H Maeaolay, to], i. p. 491 "—Sfcemd Bditum. Ciiluiiel Graham'* actual conduct Dpon 

^^^H tha mclandioly neciuiun in quention, as wo aliull provu in tlio Bcquel by production 

^^^^P of lii« uwn official report, the ayatemntrc, legal, aiid merciful manner in «hicli lie 

^^^ porformeil hi> unploMOt official duty, — the pnx en lialiin and anlecvdenta of thai 

moBl dangeroiu rebel, who wan UlCD necenarily aubjeeled In militnry exeeutinu, 

inflicteJ in due form of tnartial law.— and Uib whole lenor of (irnliam'a eorreupm- 

dence al the IJme, completely give the lie, aa we sVlI find, lo Wodmw'H egregroiia 

Inoliernw, — ■■ 1 am wrll infunned, that CtaverhuuK \iniaiB\t fetiptriifl g admowMytd 
kflerwardii, that John Bniwn's prayer left euch imprcnioDB upon his «pirit, that he 
wuld naner get allngellier worn otT, rktn ke jtaf kimtdf liheHf to IkiKk v/ U." 
Yel, M " il« atory mu," (and falaely), Claverhou« .vaa rfal/y and hmttg occnpicil 
with niel] ■cenea I But why doea Lonl Macaulay merely aay ■ it wan rnwuamf T" 
Do» not Wadru» lell him, - / in xM if/ormid." Iluwcver, the cxpreM.ui* 
■ aoiivd cnneeianee and ndaniantine heart," enllgtilen Ilia iornrmBiiiui with meli » 
Kaali -if genin* ilml we mual furgive llie nuiiMnw fur Uie take of tliu aljla. 



ME3I0R1A1£ OF THE 

shook tlie credit, aiid debased the oliject of historical annale. 
But we must protest agaiiiHt a modem rtjhcimento, of the fana- 
tical fahle, wherein the pen that most delights the present 
age is employed to delete, to a certain extent, the gross im- 
probabilitiea which afford sometliing like an antidote to tho 
original slander. If Wodrow have said, that this saintly vic- 
tim waa only " with some difficulty" permitted to pray, by im- 
patient dragoons thirsting for bis blood, and yet that his gift 
and grace of prayer bad surh free allowance, upon the very occa- 
sion, and was so divinely exercieeil, that those cruel cut-throats 
instantly mutinied to a man, and became like good centurions 
on the spot, — we protest against an edition of the miracle, 
however pleasantly turned, which keeps that palpable contra- 
diction altogether out of sight. If the famtiical historian have 
distinctly told us, that, by reason of this instantaneous conver- 
sion, " not one of them would shoot liim, or obey Claverhouse's 
commands, so that he was forced to (urn executioner hijjMelf, 
and in a fret shot him with his own hand," — we protest against 
ihs political liistorian masking the gross absurdity, and ren- 
dering it tJius, — " It is said that even among the soldiers it 
was not easy to find an executioner," — and tJien leaving it to 
be inferred, from the rest of the reconstructed narrative, that 
Claverhouse had put his own hand to the bloody work, not be- 
cause forced to do so by (he mutiny of his troops, hut from a 
sudden impulse of bis own passionate temper, anticipating 
their reluctant obedience even while his victim was yet in the 
act of praying. Wodrow, then, must be allowed to tell his 
own story. 

That famous champion of the Solemn League, in the first 
place, thus characterises the militia who were employed by 
Gtovemment against the covenanting insujTection, and the 
murderous fanatics chielly predominating in the south-western 
districts of Scotland, 

" Dreadful were the acts of wickedness done by the soldiers 
at this time, and Lagg was as deep as any. They used to 
take to themselves, in their cabals, the names of de^rils and 
personB they supposed to be in Hell, and with whips to lash 
one another, as a jest iipon Hell. But / ahali draw a veil over 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 9 

laTiy of tlieir dreadful impieties I meet with in papers writ- 
ten at this time."' 

A little further on, wo have his masterpiocc, the tragedy of 
John Brown. 

" The month of May (1685) opens to us yet a more dismal 
Mene of wnofcowntaife blixMlshed ; and I may well begin with 
itiie horrid murder of that excellent person, John Brown of 
Priest-field, in the parish of Muirkirk, by Claverhouse, the 
flrat of tliis month. Scarcely ever have I met with greater 
encomiums of a country man than I have of this person, from 
people of sense and credit, yet alive, who knew him.* He had 
a small bit of land in that parish, and was a carrier to his em- 
ployment, and was ordinarily called the Christian Carrier. 
He had been a loni/ time upon his hiding in theJieMs, and was 
of great use to, and took much pains ujion the instructing of, 
several youths, who were well meaning in the main, but being 
BOW neglected in their education, and wanting the advantage of 

•.mermom, needed instnictions when they came and joined them- 
selves to the sufferers? He was of shining piety, and had 
great measures of solid, digested knowledge and experience ; 
and had a singular talent of a most plain and afi'ccting way 
of communicating his knowletlgo to others. He waa 7to way 
obnoxious to (lie Govemmenl, except for not hearing the Epis- 
copal ministers.* This good man had come liome, and was at 

■Ide work, near his own house in Priest-field, casting peats. 



For thcK ridipuloui facU, ot a nntiire bo KVdy la be grouly nil*iwpreiisDlei1, 
there in no proof uflered wlmtcver. How loldieri, of t,uy period, may cIidohc ti> 
DUN themselreH " in Itieirubali," il n«re hard losiy. Sailnnliavii beva kiiairn 
enact Ihe part of heatlion gnda, anil demean thcmnelvca on sach ocpusioni witli 
•boat a* Dincti prepricty. But ■tlien ve eipect WndroH'a aulhoritj' fur Iiih twldur- 
daah, — which gkvo birtli, liovever, la Lard Micaulajr'* BrfJsibiU and Apoltgon, — 
)■• ■■ dnvB a veil" I It wu WihIriw'b Mylfl (u state ten liineit man tlian he could 
pruvn, and to dn» a reil whsn Ihem wkm unlliing la ilirolow. 

Lnrd MacaiiU)' has magniloqucnll; tranotated lliis int", — "Old nica who re- 
'Mcniberfd the evil days." Out ho Iiba no conceptiaD of the snrt of old voineii 
'edraw dealt with, atid what an tAi woman ho waa lilmnolf. 

By " HilTci'ert" Wottrow mvAna ilio rebcla under Hu(i.-uce of fngitotiun, and 
munUren of ArrhLinlinp Sharp, and llieir alieltora. Drown «aa mulsr of ■ 
in the nioniv, aoppiied willi arms ; and dnubllesa he iuMroctod Ihtwe 
Ul«, wham Wodniw charaeleHtBB with micIi «i»[riciniia oirmimlooulJon, in ilw 
of llioae anna, and in all llir niurdenms pracliuea of Ihal akulking rebellion. 
Then huw vamii he to figure in ihc l><iii«aui> Itoll af eriniinalt for trial : am 
jte the U*t of the rii;;ilalK<l ; and U> Ih- " « \-ng time u|Kin hi> hiding in llie Hvlda" 



10 MEMOHIALS or THE 

CkverliuuBe was iroiuiug frgui l^smahago with tliree truops of 
dragoons. Wliether he had got any information of Jolm's 
jjiety, and nonconformity, I cannot tell ; but he caused bring 
him up to his own door, from the place where he wae.' I do 
not find* they were at much trouble with him in interroga- 
tories and questions. We see /Acjn^ now almost wearied of 
that leisurely way of doing busiuess. Neither do any of my 
injxn-inati<m8 bear that the abjuration oath was ofi'ered to liim.* 
With some difficulty he was allowed to pray ; which he did 
with the greatest liberty and melting ; and, withal, in such 
suitable and scriptural expreBsions, and in a peculiar ^WtctoiM 
style, — he ha\-tug great measures of the gift as well as grace of 
prayer, — that the soldiers were affected and astonished. Yea, — 
which is yet more singular, — such convictions were left in their 
liosome, that, ae my informations bear, not one of them woidd 
shoot him, or obey Claverhouse's commonda ,* so that he was 
forced to turn executioner himself, and in a fret shot him 
^vith his own hand, before his own door, his wife with a young 
infant standing by, and she very near the time of lier delivery 
of another child. When tears and entreaties could not pre- 
vail, and Claverhouse had shot him dead, I am credibly in- 
formed the widow said to liim, — ' Well, Sir, you must give an 
account of what you have done.' Claverhouse answered, — ' To 
men I can be answerable, and as for God, I'll take him into 
mine own hand.' I am icell informed that Claverhouse himself 
frequently acknowledged afterwards, that John Brown's prayer 
left such impressions upon his spirit, that he could never get al- 
together worn off, when he gave himself liberty to think of it."* 

' Jolin Brown, and kii aepkta aloag w'lLli him, lo whiirli lost Wiiilruw makes no 
ullusiui), n-ere cDileavuuriiig lo osuipe rrom the dragoons, who " puiitiied llieni & 
great way through the moBBea, and in the end seized them ;" (uffli^ial report by 
Uaverliouw, lo be afterwarda quoted nt length.} 
' For " do not find," rewl " would not find." 



I 



■ Whoi 






* He wag [ireEBed to abaolve liimself, by taking tlie presrribed oalli, fnim Iho moat 
nim|iitiit Mt» of bigli treuwn, whicli he oliBtinatcl)' and violent!}' refum'J tn dn. 
But of course " mj infomntions" would not bear th>(. 

• It will bceliown in Ihonequi-I, that WodrowHHBactukllyin pwiMiition i>r wril- 
toti iiifumwilinn, wliich he uies in otiicr reHiwct*, bearing tho rrry rtrrrtr 0/ Ihr 
HiiteauMt that LlavsrhuuH executed tlie rebel with his own hand ! 

' Wadniw'BlliHtory of the Siiffennga of llic Chiiirli of Seolhind, w.l. iv, ]■. L'4 4. 
• Icl-m RlitliiH, See piwiuiis noir, p 7. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



11 



I 



That a man of Lord Macaulay's «xperieuce, in letters, in 

kistory, and in human nature, should uot have detected the 

ip of invention and falaeliood throughout this absurd story, 

certainly not a little remarkabltr. The manner, however, in 

'hich he lias pnined and dresseii, while adopting it, — abating 
the coutnulii'tious and inflating the language, — hetraya some- 
thing like a conficiouBneBS, that the anecdote was scarcely 
presentable in WoUrow'e own words. If true, well might that 
Btory be made the text for the severest denunciations of his- 
tory against a Government owning siifh an executive. For 
liQrahain of Claverhouse was not only the greatest captain of 
llie day, but a privy councillor of the highest repute, and the 
'observed of all observers, not merely us a military leader, but 
among those distinguished statesmen who were then simulta- 
neously struggling to uphold the Tlirono against the outrageous 
anarchy of the Conventicles. Lord Mat'aulay has presented 
ns with the portrait of an interesting, harmless, domestic 
peasant ; peaceable, and divine even " as one inapinid ;' yet 
franticly " murdered," without an intelligible cause, by the 
hand of the bravest commander, and one of the most distin- 
guished and proudest gentlemen who graced the highest society 
in those days ; one who was constantly welcome to, and fami- 
liar with, Charles the Second at Court. But could our English 
historian not gather from Wodrow's narrative, that he was de- 
scribing a martjT of the very schtx*! of Keuwick, Shields, and 
Cameron ? Of course Wudrow arrayed him, as he arrayed every 
covenanting fanatic, in gannents white as suow. But he never 
meant it to lie doubted that John Brown was a labourer in 
the same vineyard with those who had [leaned and promulga- 
ted, a few months before, the declaration of war, and iucite- 
aieDt to assassination, posted on church-doors, and market 
crosses throughout Scotland. That which was taught, enjoin- 
ed, and sanctitied, by such institutes of murder, as " A Hind 
let loose," was just what John Brown had long learnt, and was 
.teacliing to others. Why ditl ho go to death on the spot, 

laviug failed to save his life by flight), rather than abjure the 
laimcd rt-Kdlion, and instnictions to assassinate, which 
80 greatly alarmed the fJovtirnment inimediaU-ly before ? 

mt brciiuKf III' wii." 11 di'lermincd ilisriple ■.!' lliiit verv hi-luKil. 




12 MEUGKIALS OF THE 

Lord Mai-aulay cannot possibly place liiin under any other 
category. And how doee he himself, in another and a truer 
page, characterise the whoU; vrmyoi those Scottish saints and 
martyrs, — one individual of whom, this John Brown, he haa 
described to us in those greatly uiistakeu and maudlin terms ? 
Manifestly the mista of " passion and ijrejudice," (to use a 
phrase of his own) passed off at times, from tlie intellectual 
vision of the great landscape gardener of England's history. 
In vain had he tried, by desultory phmgee into the filthy wells 
of Magus-Muir Christianity, to find materials in support of 
his political theories, and etTervescing vituperation. He had 
actually taken, not sweet, Init sour counsel together witli the 
" Hind let loose," and " Faithful Contendings." And with 
what result ? To his shocked and disenchanted eye, the white 
lamb, John Brown, anon presents itself as black as Tophct ! 
" There was, indeed," he nays, " a class of adhuniaats who were 
little in the habit of calculating chances, and whom oppres- 
sion had not tamed Imt maddened." But why were they 
opp}-esaed, and how maddened f Philip sober shall tell ns. And 
let it be rememl>ered that John Brown himaclf would have 
felt that he was grievously wTonged, were he not distinctly 
admitted to have been n Muster in the Israel here dcscrilied, 

" They wanted not only freedom of conscience for them- 
selves, but absolute dominion over the consciences of others ; not 
only the Presbyterian doctrine, i^ility, and worship, but the 
Covenant in its utmost rigour. Nothing would content them, 
but that every end for which civil society exists, should bo 
aacrificed to the ascendancy of a theological system. One who 
believed no form of church government to be worth a l)reach 
of Christian charity, and who recommended comprehension 
and toleration, wa.s, in their phrase, halting between Jehovah 
and Baal. One who co7idemncd such acts as the murder of 
Curdhud Bcafoun and Archbishop S/tarp, foil into the same 
sin for whitrh Siml had been rejected from being King over 
Israel. All the rules by which, among civilized and Christian 
men, tlie horrors of war are mitigated, were abominations in 
tlie sight of the Lord. Quarter vxis to lie neitlier taken nor 
ijiven, A Malay running a rauck, a nunl dog pursued by a 
cniwd, wen- Ihe models tube imitated by ('Iirisliiiii men fi.irhl- 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 13 

ing in just eelf defence. To ri>as(iti8 eucli as guide the con- 
duct of BtatcBincn and generals, the minds of these zealots 
were absolutely imjx^-vwwa. That a raaii should venture to 

*nTge such reasons, was sufficient evidence tliat lie waa not one 
of the faithful." 
" If any person is inclined to suspect that I have exagge- 
rated the absurdity and /eroctty of these men, I would advise 
him to read two books which will convince him that I have 
^^ rather so/teTifd than overcharged the portrait ; Shields' ' Hind 
^Hiiet loose.' and ' Faithful Contondings displayed.'"' 
^^V Does Lord Macaulay imagine that he can persuade any in- 
^^■lelUgent reader, that such horrible dispositions as these, 
^^Kcharacterising a multitudinous sect in Scotland, were simply, 
^^^md suddenly, created by what he vaguely terms religious pcr- 
^^Ktecation ? Did hie own acumen never lead him to suspect, 
^^Kthat he had mistaken the effert for the cause ? That persecu- 
^^Vtion, if persecution there was, arose out of the same necessity 
^" that impels a crowd to pursue a mad dog, and did not create 
the madiiosB. Else where he says, — " There were, particularly 
in the western lowlands, many Jierce and resolute men, who 
r held that the obligation Ui observe tho Covenant, was para- 
t-mount to the obUgation to obey (he magistrate." Was this 
■ profane and desulating doctrine engendered hy persecution ? 
" These people," he adds, " in defiance of the law, persisted in 
■meeting to worship God after tlieir own fashion."* But what 
Iras their own fashion ? To urge and howl forth, at armed 
wnventicles, such " paramount obligations," such canine mad- 
Ibcbs, aa that which this eloquent historian justly imputes 
Bto the whole sect. When Saint Mitchell in 1 6(!8 levelled his 
Keowardly pistol at the Archbishop of St Andrews, and destroyed 
l^e Bishop of Orkney, he was " worshipping God after their 
Fioini fashion." He was doing what the conventicle divines had 
directed him to do. When in 1679, those unmitigated scoun- 
drels hacked to pieces the venerable Archbishop in the arms 
of his daughter, they were not, forsooth, committing a brutal 
murder imiwUed by that spirit of Tophet which, for centurteg, 
had imjM>lled to such deeds that self same sect, — they were 
worshipping God aft«r their own fashion 1 liord Macaulay, in 



k 



IIW. I. 5SS, ASn, and .V..r. 



14 MKMORIAL'^ OK THE 

a scrambling way, had fiufficieiitly iiiformed liimself of all tni 
and the civTlized mind cif the modem historiftn could not re- 
press its infinite disgust. Neither, howi-ver, could he aflbrd 
to part with all his nonsense about Dundee, and it is rathor 
amusing to observe what a strange compound he makes of the 
aiitagoaistic ideas. " Dundee," he tells us, " had been inform- 
ed that the Western Covenanters, who filled the cellarfl of the 
city, had vowed vengeance on him ; and, in truth, when we 
coDsider that their temper was singuUirly ravage, and implac- 
able; that they had been taught to regard the slaying of a per- 
secutor as a duty; that no examples furnished by Holy Writ 
had been more frequently held up to their admiration than 
Ehud stabbing Eglon, and Samuel hewing Agag limb from 
limb ; that they had never heard any achievement in the his- 
tory of their own country more warmly praised, by their 
favourite teachers, than the butchery of Cardiual Beatoun, and 
Archbishop yiiarj), — we may well wonder that a man who had 
shed the blood of the saints like waf^r, should have been able to 
walk the High Street in safety for a day,"' 

1 Hist. iii. 2r5, 276. Such being Lurd Macaulay'B opiiiiua of tlio iDBanc srct 
■gainat whom atoni tha prafeBtional, loynt, and miial Me energiat or ClaTorhouw 
were direcled, lie will surelj' »pprovc of tlio fullowing ■«, pnami in t!ie iliird I'ai'- 
liamcnt of King Ciiarlcs tlie Second, 13th Sepleniber J6al. Tlie rernis or it, in 
fut, fully con-oborate the above qnolations from his liistary, igainst the fiDiliFS. 

•■ Tlie King's moal excolleot MajeBty coDBidering, llutt, nalwithalBndiDg aaaui- 
tntint bo k crime of a liigli n&lure, InconriMenl with, and wUall]' deKtruetire td, 
all liuDiita society, — yet mch are tlie pemicioiu principles, and nicked praetiwa 
of aeveml persuuB, thai tliey de assert and maintain tlicso villanous, impioiu, ■.nd 
horrid doctriues and pi-inciplea : Therfforr, bia Mnjusty, with tlie advice and 
consent of the Estaten of Parliament, dalli Hatuti and ordaiit, tliat not only 
all such persons who shall OHsasBinate, but thai all vbo shall maiiUaia or auerl that 
it ie fan^ul (o tiK any man upon difftrtnct of opinioii, or becaose they have been 
tmptoj/td in Iht lertici of lit Kiiij, or nf the Ckareh aa it is presently establisbed 
by law, shall incur the pain of treaion, and be punished by tliuel of life, lands, and 
goods: And, remembering with horror the execrable murderof that moat reverand 
and worthy Prelate, Jamea, late Arclibisliop of St Andrews, l.ard Primate of Soot- 
Und (*ho deaerved so well of tills Church and Monarchy, for bis eminent services 
to both), do ordain the Sheriff of Fife,and his deputes, to make weekly ■earches in 
tliose places, where it is, or may be, BUBpeoled these assaaeins do reside, that they 
may be brought to justice, and exemplarily puniahed ; and likewise ordaioa all 
other Sherilfs and Mugistrates, upon infonnation lliat those assaEsins are wiUiiu 
their bounds, to make seardi for and apprehend them, that they may be brought 
In justice : And do hereby ratify Che former acts of Council against such as shall 
rcwl those Munleiirs." 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



16 



^_ liin 



^Kgen 



But, to tho deeply cutting fact that they had been tavght 
to regard tlie slaying of a persecutor as a duty, the historiau 
iiraght to have added another fact, no leas incontcstilily true, 
jthat they had heen taught to regard every necessary exercise 
>.»f the executive power, against such deadly doctrines and 
jpractices, ae persecufion : and every conscientious and ener- 
getic niiniHter of tliat executive, as a persecutor. If the 

Western Covenanters" were murderous savagea, aa he dis- 
tinctly cliaracteriees them, even in what he calls a ao/tenett 
Jriew of their character, they could not be " saints." And if 
4hey were murderous savages, and not saints, all those viru- 
lent and mendacious fanatical records, which alone have given 
rise to the ridiculous falsehood that C'laverhouse " shed the 
blood of the saints lite wat^r," must go for nolhiug, and ought 
equally to have excited the contemptuous disgust of this dis- 
tinguished author. 

Lord Maeaulay, wlien tlius constrained by his own witnesses 

to Tophefise the " persecuted" Covenanters, displays liie aux- 

ity to meet the anticipated imputation of being liitnself a 

srsecutor in print, by appealing to those two works (we could 

Id a score), proving the ease against them by their own 
writings, and that his severe description was a softened state- 
ment. But when he places the crown of Tophet on the head 
■.of Claverhouse, he pretends not to prove any thing against 
iiim under the hero's own hand, and supports the unsoftened 
[ittatemeut by no reference to proof that deserves the name. 
He quotes Wodrow alone. Kow Wodrow happens to be the 
only historiau. Whig or Tory, fanatical or monarchical, who 
tells the story of the death of Jolm Brown as we have it from 
liim. Alexander Shields.the conventicle di%Tne,and anonymous 

thor of the work (" A Hind let loose") that seems to have 
'ued Lord Macaulay's eyes a little to the tnith, and Patrick 
Walker the pedlar (himself a murderer), have recorded tho 
death of John Brown in very dilFerent terms fn>m each other ; 
and both of these fanatical records atford a [wsitive contradic- 
tion of the most calumnious statement in Wodrow's, Bishop 
Burnet, who loved Uie historical lie, has not fathereil this one. 
Malcolm Laing, the Whig TacitiiB of Scotland, has affectedly 
generalised the rnhimnv. in^atead of venturing Ul«>n the details. 



16 -'' IfEMORIAI^ OF THE 

The luxuriouB amateur Whig historian, Charles Fox, languithy 
copied the sententious Laing. Sir Walter Scott, his fancy 
caught by the rude pathos of a ridiculous martyrology, adopts 
verbatim the half-crazy Walker, and tacitly rejects the dreary, 
disingenuous Wwlrow.* Mr Hill Burton, our most recent his- 
torian of the Revolution, has treated largely and elalwrately 
of Viscount Dundee, and sketched a character of him, Vt-ith 
infinite pains, that falls at once to the grouud if the legend 
of the " Christian Carrier," to which he makes no allusion, be 
true, Hu does not, indeed, profess to trace the particulars of 
Dundee's early career. But he has laboured t-o fix an accurate 
and full-length portrait of him in his plausible pages ; and, 
had he attached any credit whatever to Wodrow's butchering 
story of the death of John Brown, instead of assigning to his 
" murderer" those high heroic attributes with which he has 
relieved the deeper shadows of the picture, his pencil must 
have lapsed into the same frightful effigies presented to us by 
his immediate precursor, Lord Macaulay. 

Having meutioned Mr Ilill Burton, the latest, and let us 
hope the last minstrel of onr glorious Revolulion of 1688, 
we may pause for a moment ujwn his pleasant lucubrations, 
and contemplate the most recent historical characteristics of 
Viscount Dundee. 



2. Mr John Hill Burton's character Utice o/Dutulee. 

Tliat learned author has put forth his whole powers of pen, 
and they are not mean, to record his life, character, and 
death. The declared object is to separate mere romance from 
legitimate history, and to give us the man. In fulfilling this 
task he entirely ignores the illustrious historian who had so 

> Thia Ehall be aliown aflerwardi. Il is a remarkable circumstauce, in rc- 
fercnec to the weight of Lurd MacaiiUy'l nutlianty on the subject of the dntb of 
John Bmwn, that lie takes not the Blighlest notice of the fact (if he had erer ob- 
Berved it), that Sir Walter Scvlt, iu hia History of Scotland, gives a totally diflurent 
veraioD, in the moat easentinl iocidcut of the caluinoy. Sir Walter hjinaelf, while 
adopting a, fanatical teraiun of (lie ator}', is in like iDanner entirely ulenl aa to llic 
fact that Wodrme has recorded i I with a moat easentiaJ difTerenoe. Thna each 
historian haa hia own pet version of (lie nouKeaaical calumny, and ignorea all 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



17 



_ onliusi 



ntly preceded him in portraying Claveriiouse ; no groat 
»mi>liiiient from a historical author of the same school of 
politics. But Mr Burton himself had over-rated his materials, 
and was making hricks without straw. The suhject was by do 
means sufficiently ripe in his hands to sustain the broad and 
unhesitating conclusions of his judgment. Moreover, his own 
ches, regarding the worthy whose character, education, 
id capacities, he so confidently handles, appear to have been 
nnpardonahly lazy. That Claverhonse was an alumnus of tho 
Ahtui Mater of Scotland, is a certain fact, which he treats aa 
doubtful and inconsei^nential, even while he is dealing par- 
ticularly, and very erroneously, with the queatiou of his educa- 
tion. Then he coolly describes him as " the second son of a 
Scotch laird," whose father would have made an Edinburgh 
Lawn-market trader of him, had it not been for " a common 
usage in a country which could not exercise its energies near 
at hand without aronsing the trading jealousies of its affluent 
and powerful neighbour." Therefore, his theory is, Jock the 
lairdg hrotlter was turned adrift to carve his own fiirtunes in 
mercenary fields of fight, and "rub out," — as Mr Burton de- 
claree he must have done, — that college education he yet con- 
siders it doubtful that be had ever rubbed in. The result is, 
that our fluent historian, fmrn whose acntenesa and industry 
more might Imve been expected, blunders the hero's genealogy 
and domestic history, and, after indulging in some fanciful 
paragraphs of hero-worship, concludes, oddly enough, but like 
■U the rest, with historical calumny. 

It wtis not, however, within tho purview of Mr Burton's 
Lertaking, to clear the character of this great Scottish 
^hy from all tho fanatical trash, which, we presume, has 
him to refer to Claverhonse as the " hero-fiend.'' It is 
tther, as we understand him, in disparagement of the cham- 
pion of King James, that he says, — " Many of the attributes 
of this hero-Jiend are fabulous ; but his era was so much later 
thau tliat of the semi-mjlhic heroes wHth wbrnu he has been 
often associated, that we know a/ew wlffar Irut/is about him, 
affording a correction of tho jictidotia gtorica." Yet our his- 
torian did not know tho vulgar truth that he was his father's 
lest son. and chief of that ancient and well providol branek J 
2 Ij 



of the hoase of Gralmni, from bis notorious chieftainsUp of 
which he derived the vulgar title of Clavers.* Nor does he 
seem to have known that the hero's name, along with that of 
his younger brother David, stands recorded, 13th February 
1665, in the matriculation books of St Leonard's College of 
St Andrews, so plain that those wlio golf may read. 

Tlie name and fame of Graham of Claverhouse, have chiefly 
associated him with the great Marquis of Montrose, who, al- 
though a mythic murderer, was surely no semi-mythic hero. 
Neither have we been able to discover any fictitious glories 
whatever, recorded of Montrose's noble cadet, in any account of 
him that is at all worthy of historical correction. Heis nowhere, 
seriously at least, so recorded even by Sir Walter Scott. That 
he rode the Evil One in the shape of a coal-black steed, breath- 
ing sulphureous flames, and able to keep its feet on the face 
of a precipice, and that this satanic alliance rendered it neces- 
sary to load with a silver button in order to lay the t«mble 
rider's plume in the dust, are " fictitious glories" which scarcely 
require the correction of " vulgar truths." They belong to 
that species of rapid, dazzling, and dramatic history, which so 
often delights us in Lord Macaulay, and the Christmas panto- 
mimes. On the other hand, Romance herself need claim no 
higher attributes for Dundee, than Mr Burton has bestowed in 
the following somewhat enthusiastic estimate : — 

" A war, of peculiar and strangely incidental character, liad 
been for some time kept alive in the north by the active 
energy of one of the most original men of his day. The ac- 
tual career of Dundee, without decoration, is an affluent foun- 
tain of romance. His handsomeness, his early historical 
career, his name associating him with the great Marquis of 
Montrose, his military capacity, so great within its little 
sphere, the sad sympathy offered to those who throw their lot 
mto a desperate cause, and the heroic glory of his death. aU 
together make a true history of brighter colours than many a 
romance " 



onhflgrapliy of ihmt utij ot 



" friend tlio Lord Adroate 



»tic,' 1 
ingii 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 1 9 

Thia cliarming character must be understood as perfectly 
conaistent witli the few " vulgar trutlis" previously promiBcd, 
For our historian declares that all tliia composes the " true 
history" of Claverhouse. But we are not done with Mr Bur- 
ton's characteristics. 

" He was a man of much more far seeing ambition than the 

generality of Ms Order. He felt within himself capacities of 

a higher stamp, and aspirations also. For though he belonged 

, to the herd of mercenaries. Ids ambition, with all his defects, 

r iras of a higlier order than that of the Dugald Dalgeties who 

I «onteQted themselves with the conscioueiiess that they had 

L much hotter pay, booty, liquor, and arms, than the pikc-trail- 

era under their command. lie became a fanatic of the order 

he found himself in, — the order of the cavalier who is devoted 

to hie Monarch, and bis Monarch's aUtee, aristocratic and 

hierarchicah His fanaticism was that of the gentlenuin. It is 

m, perhaps, to associate the reproaclifid term ' fana- 

j tic,' with a word so expressive of estimable social qualities as 

kAib word ' gentleman ;' but as there is no liesitation in apply- 

5 it to religious opinions carried to excess, surely there can 

1)6 no desecration in applying it to social qualities when they 

become offensively prurient." 

This pet scnt«nce is too fanciful to be of practical value in 
clearing the character of Claverhouse. We suspect, moreover, 
a lurking fallacy. Mr Burton seems to confound the ideas of 
too much of a good thing, and too much of a bad thing. Let 
OB suppose a female countenance presented for our admiration, 
every feature of which possessos those qualities of outUne, colour, 
position, and mobility, which arc felt to constitute tlie perfec- 
tion of female beauty. The eye, in particular, is the eye of 
the gazelle, so rich in softness and lustre, which " wins where 
it wanders, dazzles where it dwells." But alaa ! it exceeds in 
■ize the eye of the patient ox (beautiful in its own head), 
while all the other features are in the due proportions of hu- 
manity. We turn from such a countenance, not, indeed, vritli 
disgust, but with diHappoiutment and distress. It is too muck 
qfa good thing. Let us now suppose a son of Adain, boastful 
of possessing the human perfection of lus maker's image. 
^B The erect, stat^-ly, draped figure H«^ms to justify the pretence. 



so MKMORIAI^ OK THE 

He particularly insists that you sliall adiuire hia leg, ae the 
perfection of the human limb, which he puts forward from be- 
neath his robe, like the King of Sjjades. Lo I hairy and hir- 
sute, crooked, horn-shod, and cloven-footed, — the hind leg, in 
short, of a bull of Bashan, — you regard it with disgust and 
terror. Still your admiration and worship is demanded, under 
the alternative of being kicked and trampled to death by the 
tyrannical hoof. Nay, under the same penalty, he insieta that 
you submit one of your own cleaner pedestals, to some horrible 
assimilating process. This, again, is too much of a bad thing. 
It is not beauty rendered disagreeable by excessive dispropor- 
tion. It is brutality rendered dangerous and Tophetical by 
excessive bumptuousness, And this we rather take to be the 
difference between that excess of the " estimable social quali- 
ties," for which Mr Burton has discovered the phrase, — " fana^ 
ticism of a gentleman," — and the religious fanaticism of the 
Scotch League and Covenant. 

Mr Burton's proposition seems to be this. The fanaticism 
of the Scotch Covenanters stands in the same relation to reli- 
gious opinions " not carried to excess," that loyalty " become 
offensively prurient" does to those more estimable social quali- 
ties expressed by the word gentleman. We do not feel much 
interested, after all, on the part of " Bloody Clavers," captious- 
ly to quarrel with the terms of that equation. Right or wrong, 
it really seems to come to this, that a Scotch fanatic is exceed- 
ingly leiligioua; and a prurient loyalist exceedingly a gentleman. 
But are we not entitled to extract, from all this pleasant play 
of words, that Dundee, if not emphatically, was at least _/?«wi- 
ticaSy a gentleman ; of superior capacities and aspirations to 
the generality of liis Order ; and that, however offensively 
prurient (to some tastes that is to say) such attributes had be- 
come in him, he was nevertheless to a certain extent endowed 
with some t)-pe or other of those estimable social qualities of 
which the word gentleman is so significant ? Come, here is 
ft new niche in history for the " hero-fiend," 

But can it be true, that a being endowed with the " hand- 
someness" of a hero of romance, and the " fanaticism of a 
gentleman ;" one of the " most original men of his day ;" of 
" military rapacity so great ;" whose ambition, capacities, and 



VISCOUNT OF DDSDEE. 



21 



aspiratiuns, were "' more far-seeing, and of a higher quality 
than the generality of his Order ;" to whom " sad sympathy" 
belongs by right of the disinterested devotion of his Hfe, and 
" the heroic glory of his death," — is it, we ask Mr Burton, 
among those vulgar truths about Dundee to which he so know- 
ingly refers, that this hero of a true romance, did put to death, 
and with his own hand, an innocent, inoffensive peasant, who, 
forhis very piety, was called the " Christian Carrier;" and that 
he perpetrated this enormity under all the circumstances of 
heartless, useless, isolated barbarity, ascribed to hira by Wod- 
row and Lord Jtacaulay ? Is that a \iilgar truth, or a vulgar 
error? 

Mr Burton is silent ; and we would have been content to 
assume his tacit rejection of the calumnious fable, were it not, 
that, after thus cbaunting the glories of theGraham, ho changes 
his hand and checks his pride, and pusses on to what he calls 
the oxe thing cerUiin. 

" One thing is certain, his utter disregard of human life, his 
vTuelty to his enemies, and his rechlesaneas of the safety of hia 
followers, would have prevented him from being a great Bri- 
fieh General, however largely he might have operated in the 
service of countries where there is less responsibility, and 
human life is of no account beside the military object to be 
obtained." 

If this sententious and somewhat bewildering deliverance, 
be subscribing, after all, to the viilgar cant about " Bloody 
Claverg," — if it mean, that, savage disregard of human life from 
the innate spirit of inhumanity, reckless and insane expendi- 
ture of the essential means of success in war from the mere 
love of cruelty and blood, characterised Dundee, the outrageous 
imputation has no foundation in truth, and is utterly incom- 
patible with any rational understanding whatever of such a 
I phrase as " the fanaticism of a gentleman." But, if it be 
taken in any other sense than that worst, how strange is the 
dogma, from an histjirian in the nuicti^enth century, that es- 
pecial regard for human life in battle, humanity in the licld 
towards a foe in anns, and carefulness in the din of conflict 
for the personal safely of armed followers, are the marked ch^ 
rarteristirH, rho iriiif ij'/n mm, of tin- croiilness of nil 




MUIOKIALS or THE 

U«neralB, aa distiuguisbed from that of foreign Geoenls, 
" largely operatiDg in countries where there is less responei- 
bility, and hajDan life is of no ci:>n»^aenee Weide the mili- 
tary object t« be attained." Generals, even great Gen^alB, 
liare varied somewhat in that respect, according to their di»- 
poeitioDs and teuperameut, in all times and nnder all climes. 
The whole eanguiuary system of embattled hosts, bvvrever, as 
we learn from the ciimuicles of Scripture down to the chro- 
nicles of iSir William Napier, involves, and to no small extent, 
disregard of htuoan life, cruelty inflicted by the species upon 
the species, and recklessness in the field, of the safety of 
" food for powder," How did Marlborough in this matter dif- 
fer from Gustavus ? How did Dundee at Killiecrankie differ 
from Wellington at Waterloo ? There, where the imperial 
eagle " tore with bloody talon the rent plain," the lives of 
thousands and thousands, even of his own followers, weighed 
with Wellington not a feather in the scale " beside the mili- 
tary object to be attained ;" and that greatest of British Gene- 
rals gained the greatest of modem combats by feeling, and 
fearing, no other responsibility. The devoted Dundee never 
commanded but in one great battle ; and there " his reckless- 
ness of the safety of hia followers" was chiefly evinced by his 
charging in person, and dying in the arms of victory. His 
christian regard for human life ; his soldierly consideration 
for his soldiers ; and the entire freedom of his lofty and en- 
lightened nature, from that cruelty which is here so oracularly 
pronounced to have disqualified him from ever becoming a 
great British General, shall, in the progress of these Memorials, 
be exemplified by facts which do not happen to fall under 
Mr Burton's special knowledge of " a few Mdgar truths about 
Dundee." 

But our historian's school of politics did not greatly incline 
him, however competent, to institute the minute inquiries re- 
quisite to correct the vulgar error of " Bloody Clavers." He 
bestows upon him, as we have shown, with more of the aff'ec- 
tation than the reality of impartial history, a somewhat enig- 
matical character of heroism, that is useless for his defence, 
and worthless to his fame. And having thus paid his character 
off, on the credit side, he proccoils, with ratlier more alacrily 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE, 



23 



I 

^^m Apen, 



to debit it to the full with all the Jftraimtioii, — we beg parJoii, 
Tophetlsm, — bestowed upon it Ity Shields, Wodrow, Walker, 
M'Crie, and Iiord Macaiiiay. Moreover, lest it Bhould be BUp- 
jMJsed that he was a literary genius, that he was educated, that 
he could read and write, — our historian has not failed to touch 
upon that phase of Dundee's character also, and with no 
friendly hand. 

" Tradition," he says, " attributes to him many brilliantly 
epigrammatic speerfies, to which hia authentic writings give 
the lie, hy shoeing that he had not sufficient command of 
grammar to have put his thoughts in the clear emphatic shape 
in which they are preserved, if he had ever formed them iu 
his mind. It is said that he studied at Bt Andrews, and knew 
something of mathematics ; but any smatteritig nf educa- 
tioR he may have received was early rubbed out in the camp 
of the mercenary soldier. He was a younger son of a Scottish 
laird ; and, according to a common usage in a country which 
could not exercise its energies near at hand without arousing 
the trading jealousies of its affluent and powerful neighbour, 
he was sent to serve abroad." " Graham's abilities, evidently, 
did not step beyond warfare." And speaking of his tradi- 
tionary reputation for Celtic letters, our historian adds, with 
the strong desire of reducing poor Claverhouse to the lowest 
place of the lowest form, — " It is not likely that Dundee knew 
their language, for he was not very toell instructed in his own." 
Nay, he quotes a meagre fragment, of one of the very few let^ 
ters which had ever come under his eye, WTitteu hy the hero, a 
mere scrap containing a hasty report, from a flying camp, of 
a few military circumstances, and a numlier of Highland namen, 
upon which slender premises he has the singular temerity to 
found the remark, — " This fragment, printed literatim, may 
stand as &fair specimen of tlio great warrior's epistolary capa- 
cities;^ an interesting subject, since Sir Walter Scott has dc- 

< The mdcr will pluw obeerva whtt Mr Burtap notea u " a fair apTcimfn uf 
tba great warrior'i e|Hstolarj' eapatUia," 

" Dundn writs rnKDMoy,Juno33, (lUeS):— "Captninof Glcnrmniul4iam'ar 

nw th«H taventll dajea. Tli« laird of Baro is there with hU iii«i. I am pri'- 

aiiadaJ Sir Donaid la thsre b}' Ihii. H'licau lauda In MarTan lo-mnri'OH earlaiiil.i . 

Apen,til«iico, Lnhall, Olangaire, K«p|>iiek, arc all T»i4y. Sir AlanandFr and Lai'Ko, 

lilh thrir mrn all ihia while wiili mt, M thai I hnpc «« mill pi nut 



2i 



UtLUUBIALS UF TU£ 



nounced hie spelliug as that of h chatDbcr-maid. It certainly 
exceeds the average spelling of the day in circuitous variabi- 
lity ; but it would be easy to find worse specimens in his class 
and rank." 

It is rather hard upon the hero of Killiccrankie, that tradi- 
tion should be accepted as infallible, in proving him a mon- 
ster, and be of no account in the matter of his "brilliantly 
epigrammatic speeches." To what " authentic -writings" of 
his our historian can possibly refer, as " giving the lie" to 
his traditional reputation for good talk, we caimot imagine. 
When Sir Walter Scott wrote his tale of Old Mortality, there 
was scarcely even the fragment of a letter from Dundee in 
print. And three-fourths at least of such authentic writings 
of his as we can now produce, are still unknown to Mr Burton 
at this present time of our writing, We have shown before, 
how very hard he was put to it, in support of his anxious 
theoiy of illiterate Clavors. Yet this appears to have been 
especially the department, in the systematic depreciation of 
the hero, assigned to Mr Burton ; as if there had been a divi- 
sion of labour, in the anxious undertaking, and Lord Macaolay 
had said to Lim, " 111 rub in the cruelty, if you'll rub out the 
learning."' Aud yet they were totally ignorant on the sub- 

uT Lachsher aboul Ihreo thauMind. Yuu nuj' jud(;e wliat wo will gett in Stn.th- 
hurig, BifJenoch, Athal, Morr, anil the Duke of Uurdon'a lands, besides the Inj'ail 
shires of BnTif, Aberdeen, Mems, Angus, P.ortli, and Stirling. 1 hope we will be 
be master* uf nortli as the King's army will be of the south. 1 had sltDost fut^t 
to (ell you of nif Lord Broad Albin who I suppose will come to tlie Relds. DuDi- 
belh with two hundred hon and eight hundred foot, mid [is t] said to be endea- 
vouring (a join UB. Uy L. Seaforth will be in a few dayes from Irlaod lo ntis his 
men for the King's ■ervicc." 

See Mr Buiton's " History nf Scotland from llie lUvulution In the Extinction of 
the tsBt JacohiCe Insum-etion, 16) 9^1 7411." 

For Mr Burton's various cliuraeleristics and nuUei^ of ClnTerhnuw consult bis 
index, nice Dundee. 

' Mr BurtonV ingenious mind is fond of starting theories, aud bending facts to 
suit Ihem. Thus he saysr-" The Smltisli Lowlanders, with all (heir capacity for 
tlie serious biuiness of life, and their performance of its duties, are an imsgtnslive 
raee.'' And, as one of the illustrations, he refers to " Dundee, one of the most eor- 
tliailg hated am that eier exiittd, yet one rhuM name and jmim, a Irvt Scot, even 
nf the iti-ongftt Prali^ltriaii I'HKeiiJep, would not willingly see excluded from tlie 
Hources of the biographieal commemorutiun of fuiinnt bub," Hist. ii. il7. What 
»orbi»(^ is this T Did our sulhor eter hai'pen (for itistntice) I" B»k Dr M'Crie '. 
am jwrhnps he couHiders llial reverend crilic's " ecitmncniomlion' of D.mder, in 



I 

I 







VISCOUNT OF DUNDEli:. 25 

ject of Lis actual conduct, dispositions, educatiou, and acquire- 
ments. Even tbc great novelist, when he so vividly depicted 
the disastrous affair of Drumclog, was not aware uf a letter 
being extant, in which Clavcrhonse himself reports his defeat 
to bead quarters, in the very qiuetest tenne of a lofty and un- 
rufi9ed spirit. When, subsequently, that letter with a few 
others came to be printed for the Bannatyne Club, Sir Walter 
■IriirrieJly crammed it into the Illustrative notes of his new 
edition of the Tales. Perhaps by this time it was de Uvp. 
For it did not exactly tally with the historical romance. 
Moreover, it seemed directly to contradict an incident which 
had added no small degree of interest to the brilliant fiction, 
and which still stands therein recurded as a real historical 
&ct, in the face i>f Clavorhouse's own letter.' It is a trifle ; 
Ibut ser\'es to mark the state of knowledge as to his " authen- 
tic writings," and the degree of attention hitherto paid to 
that subject. 

Mr Burton, however, lias, we think, dealt somewhat unfairly 
Trith Sir Walter's opinion, when he quotes liim as having, gene- 
Tally, " denounced Dundee's spelling as that of a chamber- 
maid." The letter itself will bo found in its proper place in 
these Memorials. Here we may ((uote the very hasty remark 
with which the illustrious author of Old Mortality noted the 
'newly discovered missive ; a comment which surely was never 
intended to indicate Sir Walter's general estimate of Dundee's 
educational acquirements : — 

As the skirmish of Drumclog has been of late the subject 
of some enquirj', the reader may be curious to sec Claver- 
^honae's own account of the affair, in a letter to the Earl of 

■ithgow, written immediately after the actiou. This ga- 
iKette, as it may be called, occurs in the volume called Dundee's 

Ml nviev of Sir WkIMt Scntt, and ■]« Lord Munulny'R, U fulHItinif llul dcu'ra 
gf " ■ Ini« Scot" an the auliJECt to wbich liB rcUrx, ni Uio snlci'/VNltlio iJm in Uia 
"eordi*! hklnd." The hcl is, Huluurdiml lulred o( UuiiiIm, m t nolianal fitting, 
to > Tulgu- mjtii ; tiid it 1hu> Ihwu eiigcmlpred by the itry fact tlikt " tlie tVenag 
Fn^jlarian priuciptis" of ■ ctrUuo c1u> uf aullion, hu been, to urerwlielm bia 
una with ibuxs uiU ulumnf , and BbaoluLel} tu eiutude bim from the otalogiw 
•f amiDotil and wnrth; Suilcbnu-n. 

Tho Hinxiw-d di-aib if (".)<■«.( (:rnk,>m al Druiu.-l.<p. Till. «ill he t'laKiiiirJ 
•fumards. 



30 MEMORIALS OF THE 

letters, printed by Mr Smytli© of Methven, as u contribution to 
the Bannatyue Club. The originul is in the library oi" the 
Duke of Buckinghame. Claverhouse, it may be observed, 
Hpella like a chamber-maid," 

There is no idea more puerile, than that the loose, variable, 
and, to the modem eye, very painlul and grotesque ortho- 
graphy which characterises the epistolary correspondence of 
men of education, and of the highest rank and station, during 
the latter half of the seventeenth century, has anything what- 
ever to do with the amount of their education, or their literary 
attainments and powers.' We entirely acquit Sir Walter of 



« Weci 



juch r 



Jipose tl 



aRbrd > 



few iriuBtrationB, Belectei] at 

We ijuole from •* Letten to tile Eiirl of Aberdeen," printed fur the Spalding 

Clulj, IS51. 

I. " Wliflhal], June 31. 1GS3."— » Tliere ia od Veal, a Uweler Iieu-, uho bra 
bene od the plote ; and a gunBinitlie declared that, about tliat tj in, he benpok of 
him 30 or 40 pacr of pist/A*, uliich uesr not deJyverd lo him (ill uithin tliia forl- 
night or thre weeka. Aa furder discovers ar nude in this nutter, yotir Lordabip 
Bhalt be acqueutEd bv, my Lord, jronr moat humble and fathcfall ecrvant, MoMuT." 
—{page 13U), Why, here w an Earl spelling like a laundry -inaid, and who can't 
Bpell his D»D name I Tbu same nobleman writes, March 24. 1683, — "Sins my 
cuminge from Newmarkit, Iher hapntid on Thursday at nyne a ctok al night a 
dredbll fyre ther, nliirh, in a flow hours consumed the wholl ayd of Ilie tanne op- 
posit to the Ring's lodgings, bnt nothinge tutchat on tbat eyde tliey are" (p. 103). 
Goorge eighth Earl Marischal certainly epelle like a bar-mnid. Take tliie speci- 
men, 19lh February, 1GS3,— " My Lord, the experienc and confldence I haue of 
yonr huor miks me gins yoar Lordnhip this truhle. Being informed ther ii ane 
conniderable soume taken np off such as wold not giue obcdieDce to the law, 1 bop 
by your Lordship's faaor and rwommeudatian J nay kaatani KSmr, fc, (p. 99.) 
I'hen wo have a Duko spelling like a dsiry-miiid : " Hamilton, 12Ui January, 
1683 ;'■ — " Being under a course of phisik, it is not, uilliout danger, in my pouer 
lo come in so soon ; therfur, I make it my earnist ante to your Lordship to delay 
tlut pruces untill 1 bare the honor lo imite on yon, that iff 1 be not instrumentsil 
to agrie the matter, I may at least iudevore," Ac. " My Lord, your Lordship's 
moat humble scrvaut, Hamil^jn."— (p. 90.) ^a» let us see how ClaTerfaouse 
spelt when he was under iiit/iie ; for the Oevil it seema had not beeu able lo save 
him from the Apothecary. He is writing to Quceoeberry, ISlh October, 1083. — 
" The Bishop of Edinbourg did me the faveur to com and see me yesterday ; 
being under fisik ; when he took occaaion to tell me all had passed betwixt your 
Lordship and him aa to the business of the loun of Edinbourg, and made ehou oT 
great grief that he had had the misforlun to incur your Lordship's displeascnr,'' Ac. 
QiUtmbtrTS Fapert, orij. MS, And think of the learned and acrompliahcd Lord 
Advocate, Sir George Mackensie, spelling like a byre-maid, in a letter to Aberdeen 
<p. 88.) "QatrOM hanbrok ■ c^batl that was designing in Galloway, to undertak 
for the peace of the eiiuntrry as Clidsdalc did. The countrey is most peacable 



I 
J 



VISCOrNT OF DUNDEE. 27 

Eul intention, in the above crude remark, so to teat the literary 
P'^alitteB of Dundee, Hia letters are under the very same 
predicament, in regard to orthography, as all the letters of the 
noblemen and gentlemen with whom he was in constant cor- 
respondence for years. And, as regards composition, more 
I ftcute, pointed, and spirited productions, of the rapid episto- 
r lary kind, emanating, too, from a flying camp, and rarely from 
~ the retirement of his closet, were never penned. But Sir Wal- 
ter Scott has been made the scape-goat, for pronouncing him 
uneducated and illiterate, because of " spelling like a chamber- 
maid ;" a fanciful idea which, we venture to say, never could 
eccur to any one of Dundee's own distinguished uorrespon- 
[ dents. 

It is amusing, however, to observe the use which lias been 
I made of that careless expression. " We Imve hia letters," 
[ Bays an ingenious North British reviewer, " printed from the 
I ©riginala, exhibiting a state of editcation and a tvltivation of 
I mind, that, — as Mr Macaulay said, — would have disgraced a 
I Waahenvoman." And this same clever off-hand whig critic, 
I OT his editor, has indulged in the very peculiar critical severity, 
I of heading that page of his caustic review, — "Letters a h 
] Woskertvoman"!* 

and the ahjr of Air is lyfi to b« ua peacable u Angns, oad keep llie Kirk u well." 
The B«rl of Linlidiguw we laniil voK) n kilcben-nisid. " Edta. lOlb Sept. I6S2, 
Maj li pleaiB your Lordship. Ackurding to jour comnmnda fuui of llioa Lords 
mpmnWd Ui meil, did meit upou Tliurid>y Lut, bat ree had litcll (o doc, aud 1 boop 
•lull not. ]r tliair liad anelhing aeomnl vourthie of your Lord^ip'i cogaioance 
I nlioald not haue fouled lo liaue atqiuuitit yuu thalrvilli. Vee h*UB apoinled to 
ueit ageain vpon Thnniday niit."-~(P. 67.) Wo have room Fur no maro. 

' NorUi Briliah Review, (of Profeamr Ayloun'a Lays of the Scultivli CaTaliera,) 
May IS50. We cumot diacaver tiliere Lord MocBulay Bays Ihal Clavcrhouiie'a 
ImIus " would have diagraced s washer woman." Uodoubtedly ho uaos thul 
■ImililDde with regard to the orthography of the period ; and hia romark would 
•qoaUy apply to the case of Gaverbuuse. He ■> not, bowever, apoaking of hia 
Tnpbat friend *t the time, but of Roman Catbolic cbiunpioDa of the Church, of 
wbon he Mya,^ — " Tliey had paued the greater part of their lires on the CoulineDt, 
■ad had almost uulouncd Iboir inollier tongue. Whtii they proaehed, th«ir oul- 
hndiab accent moved (he derision of tlii' audieuco. Thig t/rtll tile Haiimeomtm." 
Hltt.*al. ii. p. Ill, Srcund Edition. We nra not qiiilu ceiiain whether Lor-I 
MactnUy means Eagliab waabiu'women, or Scotch woKhcrwoawn. The waahcr- 
who waab with Ibuir arroa, or tliti waalierwnineu who waali with their leg*. 
We did not know, howuter, tliat eillii:r claaii ►[■sit liku furrvjHin. Il ia rather u 



I 

^H We did 
^^fe napyai 



28 MEHORIAI^ OF THE 

We have not been able to find, in any of Lord Macanlay's 
works, a passage where he applies that silly comparison 
directly to a letter written by Claverhouse. If the North Bri- 
tish reviewer have quoted him accurately, the historian pro- 
bably had under his eye Sir Walter Scott's illustration ; and 
the ambition of originality may have induced him to dismiss 
the chamber-maid, and take in a washerwoman of his own. 

A story is told of the expertness of a clever English barris- 
ter in breaking down evidence, when cross-examining on the 
trial of Lord Greorge Gordon. A witness was so rash as to 
attempt to identify a rioter, who had been seen carrying a 
fl^g» by describing him as, — " like a bretver^s servant in his 
best clothes" But when unsparingly pressed to come to par- 
ticulars, he could never get further, than, — " I think a brewer's 
servant s breeches, clothes, and stockings, have something very 
distinguishing ;" and so he was told to go down, amid the de- 
rision of the Court. We suspect that even the two illustrious 
men, who have characterised the epistolary orthography of 
gentlemen of the seventeenth century, as above, would have 
cut no better figure, under a like fire of clever cross-examina- 
tion, as to their distingushing marks, for the epistolary styles, 
respectively and distinctively, of the chamber-maid and the 
washerwoman. Assuming however, the accuracy of the whig 
reviewer, in saying, that Lord Macaulay has somewhere pro- 
noimced of Dundee's epistolary remains that they " would 
have disgraced u washerwoman," it were unfair to place Sir 
Walter's thoughtless remark under the same category of poli- 
tical passion and prejudice. ^ 

To those who desire to believe in, and support the credit of 
WodroVs legend of Saint Brown, it may seem necessary to 
establish the impression, that the mind of Dundee was as little 

* It was not faskionaUe in those days to spell with precision, or by any consis- 
tent mle, in private epistolary correspondence. No more than it was, or is now, 
to write like a writing master's copy. It was spelling like a pritiUr to do so. 
Authors very soon found out the value of not printing redundances or more letters 
than enough ; and the convenience, and relief, of an invariable rule of spelling in 
printed works, very soon recommended it to the reader's eye. But aristocratio 
correspondents, both in French and English, continued their careless and lavish 
abuse of the letters of the alphabet, long after the press had drilled those significant 
symbols into steady marching order. Never was there a weaker sneer, than thai 
comparison with ** chamber-maids," and ** washerwomen." 



VISCOUNT OF DONDEE. 



29 



opened by education, as it was sternly closed by nature to 
•very feeling of humanity. Fatu did not suffer him to be a 
man of letters ; nor is there any evidence, yet obtained, that 
the lava of poetic genius lurked beneath the volcanic features 
of his destiny, occasionally bursting forth with those startling 
eruptions which ever and anon illumined the career of Mon- 
trose. It is not the object of these Memorials to establish for 
Dundee a literary reputation, or, even to defend his spelling. 

^But when crude ideas, flimsy speculations, and false assump- 
tions, are grasped at with avidity, by literary critics of a cer- 
tain school, in order to give the finishing touch to their por- 
txait of Claverhouse, as a being endowed little above the beasts 
that perish, it is time the ridiculous injustice were corrected. 
Lord Macaulay, indeed, — upon whom new retrospective views, 
of the men and things he has been handling, must be apt to 
[open, as his delightful historj' sparkles on through its golden 
' ahifting sands, — seems to have discovered, just as he is dis- 
missing Dmidee with liis cars eropt, and a brand of infamy on 
his brow, that he possessed some great qualities after all. He 
honors him with this lofty eong^, — accompanied, however, 
j with a parting kick bestowed upon the disgraced hern, and all 
^irho dare to admire him : " During the last three montlis of 
s life, he had ajiproved himself a great warrior, and politician, 
tnd his name is there/ore mentioned with respect," — not, in- 
kI, by the inspired minstrel of heroic Rome, — but, " by that 
! clas8 of ptTsotis who think that there is tio excess of 
irickedness for which courage and ability do not atoue" !' 
Dundee's own official correspondence, to be aftorwar^Is pro- 
pAiced, will afford testimony of his abilities infinitely more 
valuable than any estimate by a modem historian, who was 
very ignorant of the true history and character of the hero, 
and who writes as if he really would prefer remaining so. 
But whatever Lord Macaulay and Mr Hill Burton may have 
decreed to stand for history on the subject, some of the most 
enlightened and liberal minded of l)undee'B own contera|>o- 
ries, have left, fortunately, a fc-w passing but unequivocal 
lications of their opinion of the man. 

1 after his death at Killicrrankie, which established the 

' Hi-I. iii. p. fl67. 



so MEMORIALS OF THE 

throne of King William, a Parliamentary commission ira» 
iagued, 4th July 1690, for the vieitation of Universities, Col- 
leges, and Schools in Scotland. How this instrument of pree- 
byterial tyranny was worked, is sufficiently indicated by one 
of the charges libelled against Dr Monro, Principal of the 
College of Edinburgh, namely, " His rejoicing the day that 
the news of Claverliouse his victory came to the town." The 
able and energetic object of tliis inquisitorial meaDiiess, met 
the absurdity with a withering reply. 

" The next article is, that I rejoiced upon the news of my 
Lord Dundee his victory 1 This is pleasant enough ; for he 
(the libeller) could name no outward sign or expression of it. 
He thinks I rejoice, and therefore sets it down as a ground of 
accusation I So, my Lords, it was impossible for me to shun 
this, unlcBH I liad been dead some time before the victory. 
For this libeller names his conjectures, dark consequences, 
and remote probabilities, for sufficient evidence I For any 
thing he knew, this joy appeared nowhere but on the inward 
theatre of my mind. But, to make tho story pass, why did 
he not name the usual and extravagant frolics that attend 
such mirth ? Where was it ? and with what company ? Was 
he invited to this merry meeting himself ? But this is no 
part of his business, to circumstantiate things, a* common 
sense and justice would require in accusations. This brings 
to my mind the legend of Mother Juliana, who was said to 
amell souls, and at a good distance to discern whether they 
were in a state of grace, or under the power of sin. I have 
answered once already, that it was an impudent and impious 
thing to pretend to omniscience; and that I bad some relations 
in Mackay's army, for whom I was extraordinary solicitous. 
The libeller does not think that I rejoiced at the /aS of my Lord 
Dundee ? / assure kim of the contrary. For no ffenthtnan, 
soldier, scholar, or civilised citizen, will find fault with me for 
this. I had an extraordinary value for him ; and such of his 
8 as retain any generosity, will acknoivledge he deserved 



' " Preslivterian Inqui"iliun, an IL wu praclUcd by tho V 
Edinburgli, in tbeir proceeding* Bgaiiwt »ime of the MiniaU 

September 1630," 



lilors iif Ibe Cnllege ■! 
■ Uiei-e in Augmt Blld 



VISCODNT or DUNDEE. 



31 



Thia bold and enthusiastic challenge, upon such a critical 
occa8ion,from the learned Principal of the Collegeof Edinburgh, 
intimately acquainted with Dundee, and addressing many who 
must have been familiar witli his general character, at once 
brings to shame all the pointed ))hilippics, and indignant elo- 
quence which appear iu Lord Macaulay's pages on the sub- 
. ject. It is evidence of the very highest class, iu support of 
] the heroic Viscount ha^Tug possesBed, in some degree at least, 
[ those distinguishing attributes which the Principal, upou that 
L public occasion, asserted for him with the emphatic confidence 
i friend, who neither would nor could be denied. It was 
f presented in less than a twelvemonth after the deatli of the 
I hero, and at a crisis when those addressed were all the less 
f likely to deal tenderly with his memory, or fairly by his attri- 
I bntes. The challenge was not taken up, and that burning 
I eulogy remains unquenched. Of what weight in the scale 
[ a^inst such e\'idence, is the virulence of a low-minded weaver 
[ of martyroliigies like Wodrow ? Or the ipse dixit of certain 
f historical penmen, however accomplished, flourishing in the 
[■ middle of the nineteenth century, (authors, be it also observed, 
I entirely ignorant even of what letters Dimdee had written, 
f Itod of what sentiments, moral and political, he had tlierein 
[ expressed,) that he was fanaticaJJtf a gentleman, heroically a 
I fiend, and literally a fool ? 

There is another record in favour of the maligned hero, which 
I Iiord Macaulay surely will admit to partake stronglyof the cha^ 
I ncter of contemfxirary eridence. In his tliird volume, we find 
I many references to a chronicle which he thus pointedly and just- 
1 ij eulogizes : " The singularly interesting memoirs of Sir Ewan 
I Cameron of Locheil, printed at Edinburgh for the Abbotsford 
[■Club, in 1842; the MS. must have been at least a century 
Folder," Our historian, however, avoids referring to the testi- 
mony which these memoirs contain, entirely contradictory of 
his own character of Dundee. We are there informed, and 
no doubt truly, that tho vict<)r of Killiecrankie " had made a 
considerable progress in iho mathematics, especially in those 

* Artida* of lDqai*ilioD igminit Dr Monro, la whieli he wm ni*Je In ■■■■•rr 
%ttora the Comniillee upon Ihs S7th of Aii)(uat ICDD." 
OaoAtt Ua at Killinnnkli-, ?Tlh July USn. 



32 



MEM0B1A15 OF THE 



parte of it that related to his military capacity; ai 
was no part of the belles letlres which he hail not studied with 
great care and exattness. He was mueh mast<?r in the epis- 
tolary way of writing ; lor he not only expressed himself with 
great ease and plainness, but argued well, and had a great art 
in giving his thoughts in few words. To Bum up his character 
in two words, — ho was a good Christian and indulgent huB- 
band, an accomjdished gentleman, an honest statesman, and 
a brave soldier ; and, as he had few equals among his country- 
men in these first qualities, so he had no superior in the 
last." 

Does this admirer of Dundee fall under the category of 
that " large class of persons who think that there is no ex- 
cess of wickedness for which courage and ability do not atone ?" 
Notwithstanding such dictatorial and presumptuous verbiage, 
we suspect from the above that there must have been another 
class of persons who, right or wrong, admired Dundee upon a 
less disreputable principle. Among the many other terms 
of historical hectoring which Lord Macaiday bestows upon 
our hero, occurs the epithet " profane," But the antique 
chronicler whom, for other facta, he is so fond of quoting, had 
learnt the contrary : " Besides family worship," he says, " per- 
formed regularly eveuing and morning at his house, he retired 
to his closet at certain hours, and employed himself in that 
duty. This I afiirm upon the testimony of aeverala that lived 
in Aw neighbourhood in Edinburgh, where his office of Privy 
Councillor often obliged him to be ; and, particularly, from a 
Presbyterian lady who lived long in the storey or house im- 
mediately below his Lordship's, and was otherwise so rigid in 
her opinions, that she could not believe a good thing of any 
person of his persuasion, till his conduct rectified her mis- 
take." 

We have no inclination to adopt the too successful Wodrow 
trick, of founding history, and historical characters, upon 
vague references to hearsay gossip, derived from unnamed 
" persons of credit yet alive," Evidence of that nature, when 
continually and systematically offered in its most tmsatisfac- 
tory, loose, and suspicious form, by one writing with the 
animus of the fanatical minister of Eastwood, is of little more 



J 



I 

1 

pott 
^H ooni 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 33 

lue than the paper on which it is printed. Such au anec- 
dote, however, as tho abqve, derived from a chronicler so 
nearly contemporary, of a fact so simiily told, and bo probable 
in itself, cannot well be rejected as a pure invention. If the 
Presbyterian lady quoted, and the other observing uoighboura 
©f Claverhouse in Edinburgh, never said anytliing of the kind to 
tho compiler of the Memoirs of Sir Ewan Cameron, then a 
very intelligent, unassuming, and unsuspected chronicler, 
stands convicted of a most gratuitous falsehood ! But if the 
chronicle be true, — and upon the interest and authenticity 
of his record Lord Macaulay himself lays the greatest stress, 
— what becomes of tlie Whig historian's own elaborate and 
violent Topketising of Dundee ?' 

And surely it is better evidence than that upon which 
Wodrow has canonized King William, — a specimen of Wod- 
rdwana, by the way, bo delectable, that we cannot forbear 
affording our readers the amusement of comparing it with 
the Prebyterian lady's testimony in favour of the " hero-fiend." 
Wodrow refers to a time when his Majesty was campaign- 
There was a barn near by the Sing's tent, to which he was 
irequently observed to retire, every moruiug almost. A sol- 
:dier, who noticed it, was very earnest to know what the King 
iras a-doing; and found means to get into the barn next 
morning before the King, and hide himself beneath some 
pottles of straw, and lie very close. He observed the Euig 
oome in, and shut the door behind him ; and take out of hia 

licet a little bible, and read upon it, standing, for near half 

hofir; and several times took his eyes off it, and looked up 
rto heaven, This he closeJ, and kneek-J down and prayed 

" Althoagh llie mamiHrB cannat exictly be lemiucl conteniponuieou*, yet they 
••re oompilsd bo very recently itter the dste of the tmiwuliuiu recordis], and 
fnm HMb uncuvptioaable aourccs, as to BfTord the most ubiificlory goarantee for 
their Milheoticity ; while the general caudoiir uud iiiipartialitj' M llie nari'atiTp, 
and the additloiial liglit thrown apon tho uumDera and state of eocielj iliirin); tlie 
a«TMlle«ti(li century, niuM reader them an >ccFplab)e aildilioD to aDtiijuarlan Ute- 
ralure. There is do reaaoa to doubt that the author was John Dnimmoud, one ol 
tlia family of Dnimmoud of Balhaldy, in Stirlingshire ; but whether he iraa tho 
ETMidaoii ur great-grandson of Sir Ewan Cameron, or whether he was tlie pro- 
prietor of Balhaldy, or only a yonnger brother, does not stem perfectly ™rt«iD." — 
BdUcr-t pTffiMtt fo iffluin of Sir Kuan CrMrr,,,,. 



34 MEMORIALS OF THE 

moet fervetttly, and weeped very much. Then he aroee, uiil 

took another book out of his pocket, which he said was 
FlavelVs piece on the heart. Aud after he had read upon that 
for about a quarter of an hour, he put it up, aud prayed Tory 
shortly, staudiiig on his feet, but most fervently, with many 
tears. And, after all, wiped his eyes and his face, aud opened 
the door and went out. This was a gi-eat conviction to tlie 
fellow, who did not think that kings hud prayed any."^ 

• Kow much has Lord MacaulayH historj' suffered, by his not 
studying a Httle more cloBoly the authors upon whom he re- 
lies I " Of the sociahleuess of Charles the Second," he tella 
us, " Wilham was entirely destitute. He seldom came forth 
from his closet ; and when he appeared m the public rooms, 
he stood among the crowd of courtiers and ladies stern and 
abstracted, making no jest, and stniUng ai none.* His freezing 
look, his silence, the dry and concise answers which he uttered 
when he could keep silence no longer, disgusted noblemen 
and gentlemen who had been accustomed to lie slapped on the 
back by their royal masters, called Jack or Harry, congratu- 
lated about race-cnps, or rallied about actresses. The women 
missed the homage due to their sex. They obwrved that the 
King spoke in a somewhat imperious tone even to the wife to 
whom he owed so much, and whom he sincerely loved and 
esteemed.* They were amused aud shocked to see him when 
the Princess Anne diueJ with him, and when the first green 
peas of the year were put on the table, devour the whole dish 

■ Wudrow (hue slates his anlliority :— " Mr Andrew Fullerton tells me he bad 
thia scnonnt of King Williani rroin Mr Varttair; whg owl with the King in tlw 
cwnp M llio liait."—AHnltcl'i, vol. i. p. Efi4. 

' WoJrow given UB this very different portr»it of King WiiliBm : — 
" About tlic 1G95, Sir William Cunningham of Cunninglinnilicad was standing in 
the King's ronm, the King and Qacen present, Portland, and some otliera. Tbs 
King cast his eye on Sir Willtsm.iDd said, ■ 1 know Sir William iaa Scotsmno, but 
pray what part uf Scotland is heV Portland ■nsu'ered, ' Sir, he is a west country 
gentleman.' The King looking Xo him, louektd hit tiott viA kii fingtr, and imiling, 
said, < Sir William, I warrant yon a great Whig ! ' and went tii hia coiich. Port- 
land, in going out, suid, ■ Sir William, jon was as much on if the King \a<l called 
yon BWODlheBrt."'^^na/cF(a, vol. i. p. 304. 

* Aud to whom he was most unfaitlirul,— a notorious fact, which Lord Mncaulay 
is pleased lo treat most lender!)' as regards King William, however necessary he 
mighl (teem it lo expose and execmlP the infidelities of llie two last Sluai't*. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 36 

without offering a Hpoonful to her Royal Highness ; aud thoy 
prououDced that this soldier and politician waa no better than 
a Low Dutch hear."* 

The good but curious centurion in the straw had greatly 
the advantage of " the crowd of courtiers and ladies" in the 
presence chamber. They ought to have seen the royal glut> 
ton of green peas, whom thoy so griovoUBly misunderstood, 
Butfering, " every moniiug almost," under the agonizing in- 
fluence, not of the peas, hut uf his own solitary and seraphic 
exercises. They should have witnessed his tears, and inward 
strife, l>eside the pottles of straw. They should have gazed 
npon him , with reverential affection, as he " wiped his eyes, 
and his face,' and opened the door, and went out." Then 
would they, and Lord Macaulay, have bettor known how to 
value the gem of 1688, — the thrice blessed Protestant King 
of Qlencoe, and Presbyterian worshipywr in a bam. 

Two great historical works passing through the press at the 
same time, by authors of the same school of polities, recog- 
nizing each other in those stately comjiliments which Lord 

' HiU. vol. iii. p. 51 ; niiil B •crj' anund juilginent il wu, by Lord lifac.ialay'ii 
own sliuwing. Wodmw, linweTcr. |irp»ciila uf wilh Ihis pirlui-e of liia tact Knd 
DWDnere : — " Mr Audrew FullcrtuD lulJ iiic, likewiw, he bnti i( froia giiod hiudt, 
tlutt ona momtiig vlivn llic King wu in his clonet, •nine Sciitnaeii fall a-gpe>kiiig 
to Uw King uient hlr Caretiira, and Iboy told him it wu tEie mind of hi< bust 
fiicnd* be (liotild be removed frvra ibout him ; and the English BiBho|s w«n> 
ttkiDg ombn^e tliat he Bhouid have w much nf. iiin ear. The King g«va thero 
M awwer. Williin a while tlie King came rorlli la the Cliamber nf Presence, 
and the un-wiilora, nDbility and otiier*, made a lane for lilni to go tliruugli Ihem. 
At tho entry uf the iaiia Mr Carsluira Mood. Tlie King bowed bi all as he came 
Ihrougb them ; and wlivu he came near to Mr Curatain, he put out hia tiand to 
blm, and aaid in the hearing of all, ' Honest William Cumlair*, how it all with Uiee 
Ihl* iDOraing I' Tliiawai aniwer enougli la his acciuen."— ^najfcfx, vol. i. p. 264. 
Thia, we prcMime, waa the mode iu which King William " slapped on the back" hia 
bvuUT«<l cnurtirrs. 

> According to Uie following anecdote of Wodro«'% King William eliould also 
have wiped the |>1kce wIiok he had ticen standing : — 

•• Mr Kaslie lelh ine, thai when King William was in llallnnd, ha had giiod nu. 
■ from some of his serTant*. tliat, either bnfiire be eunc to England or wax 
10 the war, he was observed long in privale doMt at praj-er ; and when tlin 
the plaoe wliera lia leaned, it mm aii *«< mlA lian.'" — Amtlrtta, 



36 MEMOItlAIi OF THE 

Macaulay and Mr John Hill Burton have iuterchanged,' ana 

yet showing at totally oppoait-e points of the compass with 
regard to the characteristics of such a figure in history as 
Viscount Dundee, certainly causes the historic muse to look 
extremely foolish. Hand in hajjd with Mr Burton, she il- 
lustrates in lofty language the " fanaticism of a gentleman." 
Uahered by Lord Macaulay, she forgets her dignity, and foams 
at the mouth, in her excit€d proclamation of the styles and 
titles of the " chief of this Tophet." It will be instructive to 
cull from the latter all that terrific Macaiilese about the Vis- 
count of Dundee. 

1. He was " the murderer," by right of having put to death 
with tiia own hand, and " in a fury," the " Christian Carrier," 
every man of bis three troops of dragoons, composed of " Apol- 
lyon and Beelzebub," having refused to commit that crime. 
2. He was " rapacious and profane, of violent temper, and 
obdurate of heart." 3. He " has left a name which, wherever 
the Scottish race is settled on the face of the globe, is men- 
tioned with a i>eculiar energy of hatred." 4. " To recapitu- 
late all the crimes, by which this man, and men like him, 
goaded the peasantry of the western shires into madness,^ 

> Mr Burton, in liii woU written llislor; of the Revoliilion (Vol. ii. |i. 507, nott), 
deMgnntCB Lord Mncaul*y " the Rrat historian uf our da}." This was soon After 
the publication of tho two first volumea of his Ilistury of Elagland. Lard Macaulay 
relurna the coniplimeut in his third volume (p. 355), by refurring to " Mr Borten's 
Taluahle Histsry of Scotlanil." Wb presume tbey are Loth Scotelimen. 

* Into what sort of madm-Bs I The madiiiaH, for inatauoe, of murdenDg Atch- 
bishop Sharp I Lord Macaulay seems to say so ; for he has faToured us wiiti thia 
apologttie record of that horrible crinie : — " In Scotland, some of ttie iicrtcculal 
VomuiT-lfrt, dnven mad by njiprcsBion, had lately murdered llic Primate, iiad 
taken arms against the GovemmcDt, had obtained tfome advantagifs against the 
King'a forces, and liad not been put down, till Monmouth, at the bead of some 
troops from England, had ruuled them at Bolhwell Bridge. These ztalvU were 
most numerous among tho rueties of tlie Western Lowlands, who were vulgarly 
called WjSi^."_(ilist. vol. i. p. 257.) Now, were these " lealots" originally an 
ianocent, i>caceable " peasantry," until " goaded into maduess" by Colonel Graham 
of ClaverhoQBO I Or, were they not the very « clan of nfiuiiaOt" whom he else- 
where describes as those who *■ wanted not onlif freedom of conscionce for them- 
selves, but abiolMti dominion oter Ihe conicitncit of othtn" J The very men of 
whom he says, " to reasons such as guide the conduct of statesmen and generals, 
ihe minds of these aaloli were abioiultly imptrviiiut" ? (See h//ore, pp. 12, 13 ) 
Was his mud character a cretition of Claverhoase'Sj—carvgd by him, with a butcher's 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



37 



I 



^^m ii|»< 



would Iw an eudlese task." 5. He carried witbiu his breast a 
" seared conscience, and an adamantine heart," 6. He was 
" the man of blood, whose name was never mentioned but 
with a shudder at tlie hearth of any Presbyterian family." 

7. He was " haunted by that consciousness o£ inexpiable guiU, 
and by that dread of a terrible retribution, which the ancient 
polytheists personifled under the awful name of the Furiea."^ 

8. " His old troopers, the Solans and Beehebuba who had 
shared his crimes, were ready to be the companions of his 
flight.' 9. " The Covcnantfcrs of the west hated Dunilec with 
deadly hatred.' In their part of the coimtry, the memory of 
his cruelty was fitill fresh. Every village had its own tale 
of blood. The grey-headed father was missed in one dwelling, 
— the hopeful stripling in another.' It was remembered but 
too well how the dragoons had stalked into the peasant's cot- 
tage, cursing, and damning Aim, themselves, and each other, at 
every second word ; pushing from the ingle-nook his grand- 
mother of eighty ; and thrusting their hands into the bosom 
of his daughter of sixteen ; how the abjuration Iiad been l-cn- 
dered to him ; how he had folded liis arms, and said, ' Ooil's 
will Ije done ;'^ how the CoUmd had called for a file with loadud 

knife, out of an inicrcsiing, iDOoeent, vroitem p«uunt 1 Etcd Lord MiciuUy 
eannM write noDKnw wit)i impunity. 

> Hist. vol. iii. pp. 270, S«0. Il ii almoit ii««11du to nole, thM lliia ii > pure in- 
roDliou or the poetical hiatoriui's own ImiginaUon. Ai also !■ tliat aboul s " ihiid- 
icfMt the hearth oSanfPrt^-t/ttriait/afUy!" It iBBciircel)' Turin Lord MacsaU; 
Id wield against poor ClaTerliuuse botli the ChriEtiau denionology and the heatlMn 
mythology. Such r»lundanl imngcry is wliat Mr Hill Burtoii would call " uBon- 
avely pruneiil." 

> Theec are the " xealols" again. Did Ilieeo " alniird and ferocious men" boMow 
their " deadly hatred" upon nobody but Dundra I 

■ But, may we aik, whellier this " grey-headed aire," and " liopoFul scrip- 
HoK," wera innocent peasants, or Ibe murderous zealota ■* of tlie west T" Was M 
tbia a acene in a peiLsant's cottage berore tHilng " goaded into rtuidnAte,'^ tjr aftrr t 
Before, or afKr, the full of tlie wratcin peasanlry from thoir «tat« of pmcc'rul 
ionooenca into that of tlie " absurdity and femcity" of marderera and assuitii* t 
In oitlicr ease, however, no one can approve of the ciiiduct of tlio diii)!iH>n « li<i 
" pushed" tliD very old woman from the flnwido.and disturbed, widi iiutialloHed 
hauda, the fahit of the Tery young one. We must doubt ouy liiiiig uf iliu kind 
having eccurred in tlie presence of CUtcrhouM, whow " fanaticism was llial "f liic 



IiiAiliiun of IliE limiM " had bcUer, 
i»-j, and taken tlia oatli absolfioft 



88 MEMORIALS OF TUE 

inuaketfl ; and huw, iu three uiiuutes, the gowlman of the 
house had been wallowing in a pool of blood at his own door. 
The seat of (Ae martyr was etill vacant at the fire-side ; and 
every child could point out hie grave, still green amid the 
heath. When the peitple of this region called their oppressor 
a servant of the Devil, they were not speaking figuratively. 
They believed that between the bad man and the bad artgel 
there was a close alliance on definite tenns ; that Dundee had 
hound himself to do the work of Hell on earth, and that, for 
high purposeB, hell was permitted to protect its slave till the 
measure of his guilt should be full."' 

If this he History, then is History a seneeless and a savage 
ntt. Fantastical in the delineation, disagreeable in style, and 
manifestly fictitious in fact, — that last paragraph, especially, 
would discredit any page of history, however accomplished 
the genius that directed the pen. The idealized Tt^hetism of 
a trooper's " damning," divided into three sections to heighten 
the effect t The octogenarian grandmother in the ingle-nook, 
— the grey-headed father, — the hopefid atripHng, — the invaded 
bosom of the daughter of sixteen, — and then, " the Colonel" I 
crowning tliese infernal orgies with Ms celebrated word of 
command, — Death-file to the front — abjure — make ready 

present — fire ! The pool of blood ; — scene, a peaceful pea- 
sant's cottage ; — time, just three minutes by the devil's deatli- 
tickt 

bimseir rrom proclamHlions of war BgsiDSl the Tlirone, *nd poblUbed incsniives la 
murder all aitliereaU of tlie munarclij'. No reully good and iuDncent dud, or 
woman eitlior, poucued of tlicir senses, ever refused io takti that oatll of nbjara- 
^un in Suullnud. 

> t^onBult llie indices to Lord Mscaulsy's volumee, for all hia ruiciful and friglil- 
ful cliaracterislics of ClaveilioDSC, rute Dundee. He seems to consider, that anl;t 
to the ImuU KobUsK of loiters does the privilege belong of heaping aliufte upon the 
great personHges of history. In tlie year 1 S^!, an entbusiastie but trulliful ehro- 
Dicler of fsmily history, who is liumble enungh nut to give IiU name, published a 
Totume, which ha entitled, " Account of the Clsn M'Lesn, by a Seneacliie." The 
noble author of the latest liislory of England, who will bear no brother near 
the throne of historic vitupemlion, cundescends to be down upon Ihe unfortunate 
Senrachie's (orero charncteriaties of the Marqnis of Argyle ; and after quoting 
all hia JDdigTiant but wcll-meiited expresuons of obloquy, he thus extirguishea tlie 
tamilj bard of St'Lcun : — " II is a happy thing, tlut jinwioRf u ri-Jii-l can now 
Tent themsehe'! u"(y in HuMin^."— (Hiat. vol, iil p. 3in, note ) Hiil I>ird Mnmu- 
lay heat* the Scnenrliie altogether iu the same line. 



VlS«)DfiT OF DUNDEE. 3? 

We venture to say tliat such a eceue never occurred at all, 
under any Colonel's command of the period. We shall prove 
to demonstration, that, in so far as regards Colonel Graham 
of Ciaverhouse, it is a foul calumny. But these modem Dous 
of political letters, supreme judges presiding in the grand 
tribunals of history, are apt to take liberties with her Land- 
maidens, truth and justice. Some gross exaggeration, some 
baseless violence, some glaring inconsistency, ever and anon 
startles us into the suspicion that they are but conceited cou- 
stitutiouolists after all, and not very fair historians. A de- 
termined searcher for the fact, in reference to some detail 
on which they have fancied it safe to run riot, soon learns to 
estimate at his own price their higliflown exaggerations, and 
to disregard their loudest thunder. There is somothing de- 
moralizing in all this. It is apt b) engender an undue distrust 
of all history, such as is said to have haunted Lord North, and 
an irreverent and unl>ecoming disdain for all those high attri- 
butes of the great historian, eloquence and fervour, point and 
polish, which render history no less attractive than instructivi^. 
Tlie tcmjier it provokes, doubtless undidy, reminds us of a good 
Btory which actually happened not a himdred years ago. A 
distinguished leader of the Bar of Scotland was in anxious 
uuusultalion, upon an appeal from the Court of Session, with 
a member of the English Bar, no less distinguished as a leader 
there. The long-headed logical .Scot proiKised to forbear ar- 
guing a particular point in the cause. " Why so ?" said his 
Bouthom colleague". " Because," replied the other, " the point 

is untemtble." " Mr ," rejoined the pink of Westminster 

Hall, mth a lisp and languid sigh which remlered the unduli- 
ful apophthegm doubly piquant, — " never flinch from a point 

becauRc of Bench or Woolsack, — Judges are such d il 

' fiwU." 



40 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



3. Binhop Bumet'is charwleristu-s uf Dundee. Lord Macaulay'ii 
cltamcteristics of Bishop Burnet. TTie Bishop's charac- 
ieristice ofhitmelf. 

TJiis Right Reverend historical libertine lias not given ua 
much about Dundee, of the details of whose military service, 
in the disturbed districts of Scotland, he was doubtless alto- 
gether ignorant. The little he has said is strangely ill in- 
formed, and essentially malicious. Burnet was a sycophant 
of the House of Hamilton ; and therefore most inimical to the 
name and lame of the House of Montrose. The one clear- 
minded prophet, of that duplicity in the conduct of the first 
Duke of Hamilton which jiroved fatal to his benefactor Charles 
the First, was the great Marquis, Therefore the unscrupulous 
apologist of Dnke Hamilton and his brother Lanerick, thns 
writes of their triumphant denouncer. " The Marquis of Mon- 
trose's success was very mischievous, and proved the ruin of the 
King's affairs ;" and after amusing the reader with some of his 
pleasant gossip, he adds, — " His (the King's) affairs declined 
totally in England that summer ; and Lord Hollis said to me, 
aU was owing to Lord Montrose's unhappy successes" 1 This 
paradox is the fiuishing touch to a sketch composed of various 
sly and malicious noticesof Montrose, in which theclerical artist 
would persuade us, that the predominant features of that hero's 
mind were, a mischievons spirit of ridiculous enterprise arising 
from a weak superstition, and a vain affectation of heroism 
checked and paralyzed by his personal timidity in the Jield I 
Well might filial piety, more tender of the Bishop's reputation 
than he was of that of others, suppress such a sentence as the 
following ; " Montrose, in his defeat, took too much care of 
himself ; for he was never jvilltng to expose himself too miich."^ 

From the pen of such a chronicler, no fair or trutliful re- 
cord of Graham of Claverhouse could possibly lie expected. 
He professes not only to have known him personally, but to 

' In tbo origiiinl edition of Ihc Bi»ihap'i " Own Time,'' this diigraceTuI puiago 
n-aa BUpprcseed hy the editor, tliu Bisliop's KtD. Bui it lias bven rcilared in the 
cdilian of IKS?, jiiihlisheil Ml Oxfori), with llio vulutblo ntargiDBl note* from tlie 
MSS. uf Lnrvl KurlTiioutli, Dcul Suifl, mil others. See vol. i. p. 71. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 4 1 

have posseseed his coiifideuce at the critical period of tlio 
advent of King William. " Tbe Episcopal party in Scotland 
(1688)," lie says, " saw themselves under a great cloud. So 
they resolved all to adhere to the Enrl of Dnudoe, who had 
served some years iu Holland, and was both an able officer, 
I and a man of good parts, and of some very valuable virtusH. 
Sut, as he was proud and ambitious, so bo had taken up a 
most violent hab-ed of the tohoJe Presbyterian parti/; and liad 
I executed all the severest orders against them with gmat 
rigour;^ oven to the shooting many on the high-way that 
I refused the oath required of them," Such intentionally vague, 
and malicious slip-slop it is that engenders liistory like this, — 
" Those shires iu which the Covenanters were most numerous 
were given, up to the licence of the army." Wo are further in- 
formed by the Bishop, that, — " The Earl of Dundee had been 
at London, and Iiad fixed a correspondence both with England 
and France ; though he had employed me to carry messages 
from him to the King, to know what security he might ex- 
pect if be should go and live in Scotland, witbout owning bis 
Government. The King said, if he would live peaceably, and 
at home, he would protect liim. To this he answered, that, 
unless lie wore forced to it, he woidd live quietly. But he 
went down with oth^ resolutions, and all tbe party resolved 
to submit to his command. Upon bie coming to Edinburgh 
h.6 pretended he was in danger from those armed multitudes. 
And BO he left the Conventicm, and went up and down tbe 
Higldands, and sent his agents about to bring together what 
force he could gather. This set on tbe conclnaion of tbe de- 
bates of the Convention."" 

If Burnet really was on any terms of intimacy with Dundee, 

be must have known well how meanly, how falsely, he was 

recording the noblest and most interesting public character of 

the period. Yet so little does he appear to have known aiiout 

him, that be invariably names tbe Viscount " Earl nf Dundee." 

' The fai^t is, tho Bishop cherished in secret a [let scandalous 

[ ehronicle of bis own, intended to be published after bis dcatlt, 

I wherein bo took, from time to time, a hasty and safe revenge 

■ Tha T«7 contmry is tb* tnilli, m «n shall ■bow. 

* Biuiuil'i Own Tloif, rnL iii. p. .tn.'i ; ind, vol. ir, ji. .in. 



43 UEMORIALS OF TlIK ^^H 

upon all who happened to cross las humour, Lord Dartmouth 
notes, — " Mr Secretary Juhnston, who was his (Burnet's) inti- 
mate frieud and near relation, told me, that, after a debate in 
tlie House of Lords, he usually went Iiome, and altered every 
iTod/s character as they harl pleased or diaplcased him that 
day." We happen to possess the means of strongly corrobora- 
ting, even under the Bishop's own band, this severe Bentence, 
Let U8 premise, however, I^ord Macaulay's extraordinary 
characteristics of Burnet. 

In vain has that historian provided him with a character, 
for truth, disinterestedness, generosity, and manly courage, 
such as was never bestowed upon him by any one else, save 
by the Bishop himself. " Though often misled by prejudice 
and passion he was emphatically an honest man."* We deal 
with the historian and care not for the man. " Prejudice and 
Passion," fine conventional terms, include in this case a host 
of petty iniquities, composing the historian Burnet, which it 
would scarcely have squared witJi that emphatic eulogium ta 
particularize. Even as stated, the plausible admission is 
utterly inconsistent with the idea of an honest historian. The 
man ofien misled by prejudice and passion, sacrifices truth to 
his prejudice, and honesty to his passion. But, proceeds 
Lord Macaulay, " though he was not secure from the seduc- 
tions of vanity, his spirit was raised high above the influence 
either of cupidity or fear." About as true this, as the same 
noble dispenser of characters' fiat against Ihindee. In his two 
wealthy marriages we can discover no symptoms of this prelate 
being raised any higher above the influence of cupidity than 
he was above the influence of Cupid ; and as for the rest, we 
shall prove in the sequel that he was at heart an arrant coward. 
What further ? " His nature was kind, generous, grateful, for- 
giving." Was this demonstrated by the characters he left (not 
to mention others of less note) of Charles the First, Charles 
the Second, and James the Seventh, to be published after his 
own death ? Lord Macaulay, in a note, adds this astounding 
testimony. " No person has contradicted Burnet more fre- 
quently, or with more asi»erity, than Dartmouth ; yet Dorl- 
tnoiitk eay«, — ' I do not think he ilcsigncdlv published any- 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



43 






I ^hing he believed to be false.' " The wrong witness called into 
I court by a blunder I We liave beard mucb of the noble his- 
torian's extensive reading and unbounded historical knowledge. 
Upon this occasion, however, he hod read Lord Dartmouth 
conveniently short. True, that critical nobleman, after per- 
using the portion of Burnet's history first publiahsd, noted on 
the margin, — " He was estreuiely partial, and readily took 
every thing for granted that be heard to the prejudice of those 
that he did not like ; which made him pass for a man of less 
I truth than be really was : I do not think he designedly pub- 
I lisbed anything he believed to be false." But ^\hen bis Lord- 
[ ship had perused the rest, he notes that more decided opinion 
< which bad escaped Lord Macaulay's reading : " I wrote in the 
I first volume of this book, that I did not believe the Bishop 
gnedly published any thing be bebevcd to be false ; thcre- 
L fore think myself obliged to write in this, that I tLm/ully aatis- 
|l jEm2 that he published many things that he knew to be so." And, 
7 vpou the concluding prayer of this celebrated performance, 
I the same critic remarks, — " Thus piously ends the most par- 
rtial, malicious, heap of scandal and misrepresentation, that 
[ was ever collected for the laudable design of giving a false 
I impression of persons and things to all fnture ages." The 
I Bishop himself would mthcr have dispensed with that witness 
\ to character. ' 

Lord Dartmouth knew Burnet better than Lord Macaiday 



' Lord Macoula)' only diacorered his eivn gmai blunder nfter two editiona of Iha 
two firat ToEumes of his Biitory were in (he huode of the public!. For In Ibe Mrd 
•ditiun thv note abnvo caminenlcd up<i[i appean in this uMrndal ftmn ; " No per- 
Ho has contnidictod Burntil more frequenlly, of tritli mare uperity, (lisn Diul' 
Bwa^, Yel Du-ttnoQib taya ' I do not Uiiuk be deaignedly publisbed uiy (hiog 
b* belH»*d to be false.' Al a laler period, Dartmaulh. provoked by >ome remarka 
OD binutelf, in the Kcond voluma at the Biflinp'i biatnry, relracted k'u praite ; but 
IB luch retnetioa tUUi impoiiatet on be attached" I This ia not a very moceu- 
IW or ingDDUouB oobbla. Wliat pra'iH did Lord Dartmouth relract t His justly 
■■Ten! notes on Burnet contain not a particle of prai«e. The noble auihiir, who aiiubs 
Ihrtmouthin order In cover a blunder of bin own, doiw not ocnfeis thai blunder, which 
■ppetu* in two edition* of hii work, and ■■ careful not to give the words of Lord 
Oartmoultra rrfmsfioa, but thiDka lo redoem his own fake portion by an uuworlliy. 
Mid tTBDsparBnt attack upou the truth of tlie noble author whom he had mi abaunlly 
anaqnoted. tjinipare Lord Maciiiilay's lllat-iry, vol, ii. p. 177. n-ruH'/ mliiiini, with 
■Dm UlaM •dilicin, *nl. ii. 



I 



44 HEUOBtALS OF TDK 

docs. Bat the latter continuea multiplying his characteristiua 
as if none but he had really fathomed the Bisliop. 

" Hia faults had made liim many enemies, and his virtuea 
many more." What a world we live in 1 But no matter ; in 
another page we have the reverse of that medal. " Burnet 
was a man warmly loved, as well as warmly hated. The great 
majority of the Whigs stood firmly hy Iiim ; and his ffood 
nature, and generoaity, had made him friends even among the 
Tories." What between vice and virtue, friends and foes, 
whiga and tories, the Bishop must have fared well after all. 
" He was not naturally a man <ji fine feelings ; and the life 
which he had led, had not tended to make tlit-m finer." He 
was afflicted then, we presume, ■nith an " obdurate, adman- 
tine heart," and " scared conscience" ? No such thing. Turn 
the medal, or the page, agam. Tillotsoii died. " Burnet 
preached tlie funeral sermon. His kind and howst Jieart was 
overcome by so many tender recollections, that, in tlie midst 
of hia discourse, he paused, and burst info tears, while a 
loud moan of sorrow rose from the whole auditory." But 
neither are we to suppose that this interesting divine, so ob- 
tuse of feeling, yet so tender hearted, so warmly loved, and 
at the same time so warmly hated, had not, fully earned the 
latter estimate also. " Burnet was allowed, even by friends 
and admirers, to be the most officious and mdiscreet of man- 
kind." He was " a pushing, talkative divine, who was always 
blabbing secrets, asking impertinent questions, obtruding un- 
asked advice," — and, as Lord Dartmouth, who knew him bet- 
tor still, would have added, secretly recording lies. Moreover, 
continues Lord Macaulay, " he had that character which 
satirists, novelists, and dramatists, have agreed to ascribe to 
Irish adventurers. His high animal spirits, his boastfulnesa, 
hia undissembled vauity, his propensity to blunder, his un- 
abashed audacitj', alforded inexhaustible subjects of ridicule 
to the Tories. Nor did hia enemies omit to compliment him, 
sometimes with more pleasantry than delicacy, on the breadtli 
of his shoulders, tlie thickness of his calves, and his success 
in matrimonial projects ou amorous, and opulent widows." 

What a monster 1 Surely Ihcse last named fortuuate ac- 
cpssurics ahmr pniffctcd Iiiin from !i .'^imiilliuicoup rising of 



I 

I 
I 



I 

■ 

I 



k 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 46 

frienda and foes to thrust liim out of society ? Mot at all. 
He had been admitted to familiar conversation both with 
Charles and James ; had Kved on terras of close intimacy with 
several distinguished statesmen, particularly with Halifax ; 
and had been the spiritual director of some persons of the 
highest note." And that " sagacious Priuce," King Willinm, 
though fully sensible of the Pandora's boxful of vicious quali- 
ties which Lord Macaulay has so cruelly let loose to the 
Bishop's shame, " perceived that he was nevertheless an up- 
right, couragfous, and able man, well acquainted with tho 
temper and the views of British sects and faction." Neither 
will his friendly but most damaging eulogist, who had pro- 
Dounced him " emplwHccdli/ an honest man," but " full of 
passion and prejudice," leave his posthumous chronicles with- 
out a severe correction also. Lord Macaulay assumes King 
William to have been guiltless of the massacre of Glencoe, 
but adroitly admits against him " a great fault, — a fault 
amounting to a crime," — lo-wit, that he did not immolate the 
Uastor of Stair to the manes of that glen-full of murdered 
Bcotchmen I " Burnet," he adds, " tried to frame, not a de- 
fence, but an excuse. He would /laoe na believe, that the 
King, alarmed by finding how many persons had home a pait 
in the slaughter of Glencoe, thought it better to grant a gene- 
ral amnesty than to punish one massacre by another. But 
this representation is the, very reverse o/tlie truth." But what 
matters it. Lord Dartmouth may note what he pleases of the 
Bishop debauching the historic muse according to hia own 
variable humour after a debate in the Lords ; still, Lonl 
Macaulay triiuupliantly records, tliat, " Burnet had been ex- 
horted, in the name of the Commons of Kngland, to con- 
I tinae his historical researches."^ We must now continue our 

■ Wodrow, la Ilia Analtela, i. 374, thiu indinteB the grnenl reputation which 
Bomel euJD;e<l u a Tiiilhfu] chronicler: "April, I7IU. I un told that Kaliop 
BuniDl bslh uvenl large cDlleclions rrlativu la tile Church History in Scullaiiil, 
■ad tho BuntinuBtion of the HisUirj at tlie Rerumuition ill England, ten or twelve 
foUo* in print ready for tlio pren, which be will order to bo publisliud rttn ^/ dirt, 
but mver lill llien, and therein he ri/f km thr jr<aUit vf/ntdom in mailer of f net. 
A euriotu reputatiou for a man to have acqnjnd who, acmrding lo Lord Macaulay, 



nplinl 



46 MEMOKIALS OF THE 

The following very curious " Memorandum," which hu I 
never yet entered History, was written by this notorious pre- 
late of mendacioua memory. It refers to the fearful crigis occa- 
sioned by the Rye-House plot. The date is immediately after 
the suicide of Essex, and on the eve of the execution of Lord 
Bussell, It is addressed to John Brisbane, Esq., Secretary of \ 
the Admiralty, a very distinguished public servant, who was 
the husband of Margaret, Baroness Napier in her own right. 
Hence it is that tlie curious and instructive document we are 
about to quote, has been preserved in the Napier archives, 
where it yet remains. It is the oru/inal, and all in the hand- 
writing of Buniet. The Memorandum is incloBed within tha^ 
following note i 

" Dear Sir, 

" I have writ the inclosed paper with as much order as 
the confusion I am under can allow. 1 leave it to you to shew 
it to my Lord HaHfax, or the King, as you think fit, only I 
beg you will do it as soon as may 1)6, that, in case my Lord 
Russell sends for me, the King may not be provoked against me 
by that. So, Dear Sir, adieu. 

" Memorandum for Mr Brisbane. 
" To let my Lord Privy Seal know that out of respect to ' 
him, I do not come to him,' That I look on it as a great 
favour, that when so many houses were searched mine waa 
not, in which though nothing could have been found, yet it 
would have marked me as a suspected person. That I never 
was in my whole life under so terrible a surprise and so deep 
a melancholy as the dismal things these last two or three days 
has brought forth spreads over my mind ; for God knows I 
neveraomMAas^iMpecferf any such thing; all I feared was only 
some rising if the King should happen to die ; and ihfit I only 

' Ixird HBlifiix. IF Bumet, aa he lelli lu in Iiis History, «u iu [he hKbit, be- 
fore and aftpr the date of Ihia letter, of beardiug in their Jena both the King uid 
the heir-presumptive, why bo eeretnoniotis willi the Privy Seal ! Besides, Lord 
Macaulny inrormig as, " Halifax and Bui-net had lotig been on terms of friend- 
ship ;" and " Halifax often incurred Burnet's indignant cenaare." Burnet himself 
n-nuld have us believe so ; and }'et, in tlie above letter, lie is crawling to the feet 
.if llaiifna.und lUc Kin<;, tiirough tlie intervciitlfHi of u IhirJ party ! 



VISCOIIM OF DUNDEE. 



47 



i out of the obvious things that every body sees as well aa 
I do,^ and to prevent that took more pains than perhaps any 
man in England did, in particular with my unfortunate friends, 
to let them see that nothing brought in Popery so fast in 
' Queen Mar/a days as the business of Lady Jane Grey, which 
! gave it a greater advance in the first month of that reign than 
I otherwise it is likely it would have made during her whole 
I life. So that I had not the least suspicion of this matter; yet 
I if my Lord Russell calls for my attendance now, / canttot de- 
cline iV,' hut shall do my duty with that fidelity as if any Privy- 
CouiiBellor were to overliear all that shall pass betwon us. 

" I am upon this occasion positively resolved never to have 
any thing to da more with men of business, particularly with 
any in opposition to the Court, but will divide the rest of my 
life between my function and a very few friends, and my 
laboratory ; and upon this / pass my word and faith to you, 
and that being given under my hand to you, I do not doubt but 
j/ou wiU make the like engagements in my name to the KtTig; 
and I hope my Lord Privy Seal will take occasion to do the 
! like, for I think he will believe me. I ask nor expect nothing 
but only to stand clear in the Kin^s thoughts. For preferment , 
1 am resolved against it, tko' I could obtain it ;' but I beg not 
to be more under hard thoughts ; especially since in all this 
discovery there has not been so much occasion to name me as 
to give a rise for a search ; and the friendship I had with these 
two,* and their confidence in me in all other things, may show 

' It !■ itMy curiou* (a ccmpire this •olemn dcclarttion, of hia porfect ignonuico 
of die ezUteDceof K coospincy, vith Ihe IliMorj of his Own Time, mu)y pa»age« 
oT which prove tluil lie (»> particulHrlj- cogni7Anl ot a dark rcvolatioaarj' schenie, 
Uwagb to wlut EXietil ia UDccrUin. Indeed, Lin nioBt iDtimate rricDds vere tlie 
leading cotupiratora. 

« Yet by hi» ItiMory we ai-e led (o believe that BarnefB atlendanee on Lonl 
Itnwtll ID hU Ual tnomenta was a daring act of RiBgDapimouB friendship. 
Speaking of Ilia coiuin BaillJe of Jervisvood, who waa impriwoied at Uio aame time, 
ha my», — " 1 aim, at hia deaire, sent him book* fur liia eDterlaintneDl, for whicli I 
«M threatened willi a priaon, I nid I wsa Ilia ncareal kinsman in Ihe plaeo, and 

Ilhia wa* only to do aa 1 would be dnne by. From what I found among the Scou, 
1 qaieWd Ihe (ean of Lord Ruaaell'i frienda." The Bishop had enough to du, it 
would aeem, lo i»ul kit otmfeart. 
• ■■ When the Dovil fell lick, Uie Devil a monk would be, 
When the Devil got well, Ihe Drvil a monk wn- he." 
• EM-t tXlJ Ituwll. 



48 MKMURIALS OF THE ^^^| 

that they knew I was not to be spoke to in any thing again^ i 
mi/ duty to the King. ^ I do beg of you that no discourse may 
be made of tliis, for it would look like a sneaking for some- 
what ; and you in particular know how far that it is from my 
heart ; therefore I need not heg of you, nor of my Lord Hali- 
fax, to judge aright of this message ; hut if you con rnake t/ie 
King think well of it, and say nothing of it,^ it will be the 
greatest kindncfis you cau possibly do me. I would have done 
this sooner, but it might have looked tike fear or guilt ; so I 
forbore hitherto, but now I thouglit it tit to do it. I choose 
rather to writ* it than say it, both that you might have it 
under my hand, that you may see how sincere I am in it, as 
also because I am now bo overcharged with melancholy that 
I can scarce endure any company, and for two nights have 
not been able to sleep an hour. One thing you may, as you 
think fit, tell the King, that tho' I am too inconsiderable to 
think I can ever serve him while I am ulive, yet I hope I shall 
be able to do it to some purpose after I am dead; this you 
understand^ and I will do it with zcal.^ So, my dear friend, 

' But »ee the History of his own Time ! " LorJ Enex, baing in tho aountrir, I 
want to him to warn bim of tho danger I feared Lord RubwII might be brought 
into b; Mb conrcrsaUuu witli my countrymen. He divertod me from all my ippre- 
bensiouB, and tuld me 1 might depend on it Lord Rutisol would be in nothing with- 
out lequiiiuliug bini, and he seemed to agree enUrely icitk m thai a riling in tit 
itale in rticA Ihingi ittre thtn iroaltl bt fatal, I alw&yB Baid that whan the root 
of the constituiiou was struck at to be overturned, tlien I thought subjects might 
defend lliemselves ; but I tliuuglit jealoDsiea and feara, and particular acta of in- 
juatice could not warrant this. He did agree with me in (Ilia ; bo tliougbt the ob- 
ligation between pi-iuee and iiuhject was to equally mutual, that, upon a breach on 
tho one side, the other wiu free ; but though he thought (Le Ule injustice in Lon- 
don, and the end that was driven at by it, did set them at liberty to look to them- 
selves, yet be coufesned Ihini/t iterc not ripe (»ok;A yit, and that an ill-IaJd, and ill- 
managed, Haing aauld be our ruin. 1 was then newly come from writing my His- 
tory of the RefurmatioD, and did so evidently see that the Hiruggle for Ijidy Jane 
Gray, and Wyat'a riuug, was that which threw the na^on bo quickly into Popery 
after King Edward'a days, that 1 was now rcry apprekniiiw aflhii; besides that I 
thought it mu i/et anlaK/ul." — Vol. ii. p. 15(i. It appoara from this and other paa- 
lages of his History that Burnet ini> consulted. 

■ This shows ineipnssibly mean in Burnet, ospccially compared with hia treat- 
ment of the King in his poilJiimoai History. 

• This and the concludiug paragraph of tho letter alludes to tiie History of his 
Own Time, which he waa then weaving. When, however, tiiat poetliumoua work 
■aw the hght, there appeared the moat villanons charactor of Charles II. it was 
possible to draw. And the character of Cliarles L, given in that work, is most dis- 
graceful to Bnruot ; Swift notes upon it, " not one good qoality named '." 



I 



viscoutrr of ddndee. 49 

fpity your poor melancholy friend, who was never in hia whole 

life under so deep an affliction ; for I tliitik 1 shall never en- 

I joy myself after it ; and God knows death would be now very 

] welcome to me.' Do not come near me for some time, for I 

I cannot bear any company ; only I go oft to my Lady Essex 

and weep with lier ; and, indeed, the King's carriage to her lias 

been 80 great and worthy, that it can never be loo much ad' 

mired; and lam sure, if ever I live tofnish what you know I 

am about, it, and all (he other good things I can think o/, shall not 

want all the light I can give them. Adieu, my dear friend, and 

keep this as a witness against me if I ever fail in the per- 

fofmaivct of it. I am, you know, with all the zeal and fidelity 

possible, your most faithful and most humble Ser\'ant," 

-BoKdag Monixg, "Q. BURNET." 

17(1 Jalj ICS3.'- 

Burnet'e abject letter did not succeed. He was disgraced, 
and obliged to go abroad. He became the most active agent 
of the Hevolution, and obtained a mitre from King William. 
' la his Life, prefixed to the History of his Own Time, it is 
■aid, " His behaip-iour at the trial of the Lord Russell, bis atleu- 
dance on him in prison, and afterwards upon the scaffold, the 
examination he underwent before the Council, in relation t-o 
that Lord's dying speech, and the boldness with which he 
there undertook to vindicate hia memory, as also the indig- 
nation the court expressed against him upon that occasion, 
are all fidiy set forth in t/ie hielory." But it is impossible t« 
credit that history, in such matters, after reading the above 
letter ; which, be it observed, was to be made known to the 
< King. Wlicre had Burnet miraculously found the courage 
I which, as the danger thickened around him, made him so col- 
I lected and daring, before that very King and his Council, as 
to enrage them all ? " Lord HaJifax (be says) sent me word 
that the Duke looked on my reading the journal (before the 
Council) as a studied thing, to make a panegyric on Lord 
^^^ Bussell's memi:>ry." Lord Halifax, for whom the letter had 
^^L been written from our " poor melancholy friend" ! Credat 
^^H JudcBW. 



I 

1 
I 

L 

a 

I 



DfljMiclioljr rrioud I" 



1 wnltby « 



■ biahoprle, )«t In Marc fbr ««r 



62 MEMOniAIS OF THE 

his manuscripts in the Advocates' Library. TIio world was 
not destined to be enlightened with the unique history which 
that collection could have so amply famished. It is indeed a 
voluminous and amusing medley of odd facts, characteriBtio 
anecdotes, more or less ajHwrj'plial, the vilest of superstitions, 
and the grossest of calumnies, all seemingly of equal impor- 
tance in the estimation of this vulgar glutton of coarse and 
canting gossip. 

Hia published work appeared in the shape of two lumber- 
ing folios, the first volume in 1721, and the second in 1722. 
For a long time this clamorous and assuming publication was 
unhonoured in the republic of letters ; indeed, of no account 
whatever save with a sect who were willing to believe that 
the dead made a sign, or a cow spoke, if Wodrow said it. It 
was disregarded in England until Fox's jjosthumous fragment, 
professing to be a history of the early part of the reign of 
James the Second, was published in 1808. Sir Walter Scott, 
in 1818, speaks of " the historian Wodrow, whom Mr Fox in- 
troduced to the knowledge of the English, raising the price of 
his two ponderous volumes from ten shil]ing,s to two or three 
guineas." And verily there never was a certificate of charac- 
ter less valuable than Fox's imprimatur on Wodrow's history. 
Malcolm Laing, with whom the great statesman corresponded 
while glowing with the ephemeral fancy of becoming a great 
historian, probably had introduced him to the work of the 
Martyrologist, upon whose authority Laing himself fondly 
■leant. The political bias of Fox's elegant hut feeble frag- 
ment, becomes manifest to any one who takes the trouble to 
investigate, a little more closely than he did, the most authen- 
tic contemporary sources of history, In recording the affairs 
of Scotland anno 1685, of course, Charles Fox must devote 
some pages to the " cruelty of Glovermnent." To a whig poli- 
tician undertaking such a theme, Wodrow was invaluable. 
Accordingly, that portion of Fox's narrative betrays a puerile 
dependence upon Wodrow's records of the Sufferings of his 
Kirk, — every page of which exhibits the marked charac- 
teristics of apocryphal and calumnious history. 

One of Wodrow's ingenious devices was, ever and anon to 
interject a remark, in the long catalogue of his unvouched 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 



5S 



libels, to the effect, that he had left many tales uf cruelty uu- 
told, because the full narrative would be interminable : " It 
would swell this section t«o much," he says, " should I even in- 
sert all the instances I have met with :" — " By those hints we 
may some way guess at the ravages committed upon the neigh- 
bouring parishes ; and indeed particular instances would be 
endkss" : — " It would be endless almost to enter upon the 
ravages and spulzies committed by the King's forces after the 
engagement at Bothwell :" — " Midlitudes of instances, once 
flagrant, are now at this distance lost. Not a few of them 
were never distinctly known, Iteing committed in such circum- 
Btancea as upon the matter buried them :" — " Many other bard- 
RhipB wore they under, too long here to lie narrated:" — " No 
doubt, in tfiis multitude of murders at this time, there are seve- 
ral of them not come to my knowledge, and the reader hath 
but short account of some of them ; but from the particular 
and attested narrative of others, he may forin nn idea of the 
rest:" — " I liave omitted many particulars and circumstances 
of the severities of Clavcrhouse in the south country at this 
time:* — " ShoulJ I run through all the particulars I have by 
me, of the hardships and suverilies up and down ditferent 
parishes these three or four months, this accoimt would run a 
great length," &c. ' 

Now it is somewhat amusing to find this most convenient 
mode, of renderiug calumny at once interminable and invul- 
nerable, adopted by such giants as C'liarles Fox and Lord 
Hacaulay. To recapitulate all the crimes," says the latter, 
" by which this man (Dundee) and men like him, goaded the 
peasantry of the Western Lciwlands into madness, would be 
an endless task, and a few instances must suffice." Fox had 
previously helped himself to the very same device. In his 
celebrated testimony for Wodrow, whom ho slavishly follows, 
he says, — " To recite all the instances of cruelty which occur- 
red leoiibl be rndless; but it may he necessary to remark that 
no historical facts are better ascertained than the Hccounta of 
them that are to Iw found in Wodrow, In evei-y instance 
where there has been nn opportunity of comparing those ac- 
I coQQts with reconh', and other nnthenttc monuments, they 

' Sh Wodron't Hiilorv ("uailn. 



64 MEHOKULS OF THE 

appear to be quite correct."' Did the accomplished Fox, be- 
tween the Liberties of his Country and seven's the main, his 
thundering in St Stephen's, rattling of the dice, and thumbing 
of the Classics, ever find any sucli opportunity ? His theory, 
of history, compared with bis actual practice, provokes a 
smile. While picking lazily at that which certainly failed to 
constitute his fame, he thus writes : " History goes ou, — 
but it goes on very slowly. The fact is, I am a very slow 
writer, but I promise I will persevere. I believe I am loo 
ecrujmJous both about language and facU ; though with re- 
spect to the latter it is hardly possible. It is astonishing, how 
many facts one finds related for which there is no authority 
whatsoever" I' Yet Fox swallowed Wodrow whole, as readily 
as he would have swallowed an oyster. The covenanting mar- 
tyrologist, himself gifted with a power of swallowing that 
would bolt a whale, — whom we shall discover raising the Devil 
in one page, and the dead in another, as plain matters of fact not 
to be controverted, — even the wonder-mongeriug Wodrow, in 
correspondence with congenial spirits, assumes to himself the 
severe accuracy of a Hailes, and the right to chide a Clarendon ! 
" Names" he says, writing to his friend Dr James Fraser ia 
1730, " have :io great weight with me ; and I am such an un- 
believer in historical facts, that I would still have them vouched 
with original papers ; which I desiderate in Clarendon, and 
others also."^ And yet so meanly authenticated are his own 
gross improbabilities, that when Lord Macaulay labours to 
polish, and fix them in the many coloured mosaic of his own 
history of England, he is fain to seek the protection, in every 
paragraph, of such miserable vouching as this, — " The story 
ran:" — "It is said:" — "It was reported by credible wit- 
nesses ;" — " It was nimoured :" — Till, finally, the immortal 
minstrel of antient Rome, is constrained to sitig rather than 
say, — " Old men who remembered the evil days," — like Fal- 
staff coming rollicking in with the snatch of a ballad. 

■ Fox'b Hintory, p. 140. Except tliroDgh Wodrow, Vox knew nothing oulhly 
■bent the matter of these " cruelties." 

• See Introductinn to Fn;i'a Itiatory, p. rii, 

' Letter from Wodrow to Ur Fmscr, dated Eistwood, 30tli March, 1730. See 
jliuUteta Smiica, edited by Mr Moidmeat, and published hy Tbomas G. Stereoson, 
ISSl ; /rrt wtiVj, p. 325. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



5o 



Charles Fox found it " ueceHsarj to remark," ui terms ol" 
that wrWoffe about tlie authenticity of Wodrow already quoted, 
because lUs own historical essay was gone if the Scotch mar- 
tyrologist was not to bo trusted. He Becms to have imagined, 
that, seeing the author quotes, and prints, certain official docu- 
ments, and ia not to be contradicted in certain facts which he 
derives from such sources, that therefore hia history is 
thorouglily authenticated throughout. Wodrow's work, in- 
deed, is garnished and puffed out with a vast parade of public 
documents, printed entire. But under this historical disguise 
lurk the real merits of the martyrologist, aa a historian, like 
the person of Goose Gibbie half smothered under the borrowed 
panoply of war. Doubtless he states many facts which public 
records will confirm ; and for the simple reason that from 
those records they are derived. But what records authenti- 
cate hia martyrologies ? Wliat " authentic monuments" con- 
firm those conveniently curt and slippery slanders, which form 
the staple of his work ? By what record is that more circum- 
stantial story of the " Christian Currier" verified ? Do 
" authentic monuments' support Wodrow iu his disengcnuous 
adoption of that monstrous assertion titat Archbishop Shar^i 
murdered an illegitimate infant to conceal tlio fact of its birth, 
and buried it beneath the hearth-etone ? Nay, if Fox had 
even taken the trouble to compare the official published re- 
cord, of the brutal murder of tliat veuerahlo prelate, with 
Wodrow's disgusting apology for it, he would have found that 
the latter wa» just as jesuitically false, as, in the face of facts 
too notorious, it could possibly be. 

Of course the great Whig stateman had never found an 
" opportunity" of testing that strange story of the death of 
John Brown, by any records or inonumenta whatever. Nor 
had any one else, Wo<lrnw had it all liis own way. Yet 
Fox, — who, we verily l>olieve, had no more faith in the exist- 
ence of such suiutty purity, such academic powers, such diviiir 
gifts, BUch high and holy attributes, all concentrated in tlio 
jterson of a Scotch carrier, of the troubled year of Ginl lliSO, 
than if the same had been assorted of a Siotcli tnrrior, — 
would not undertake to face the ih-imlx of that martyrological 
romance. Indeed, Ik- makes such vn-ij \i\\\<x\ work of A/* version 



66 HEHORUXS OF TBE 

<( tilmj wliiili Lord BTacanlaj has popalarised bo elaborately, 
tiutmblTe eome diffirulty in recogaizing it at all under the 
foOoinng loft; alliisioD, after the maimer of Ualcolm Laing, 
and Tacitus: — " Graham, afterward Lord Dundee, having 
intercepted the fliglit of one of these victims, he had him 
shown to his /amity, dad then murdered in the anns of bia ici/e: 
The example of persons of such high rank, and who must be 
presumed to have an education in some degree correspondent 
to their station in society, could not fail of operating upon 
men of a lower order in society."' It was not without reason 
that Lonl Nortli declared he disliked to read liistory, as he 
never could trust it. And well may we exclaim with Fox 
himself, " It is astonishing how many facts one finds related 
for which there ia no authority whatever." In this memor- 
able instance, the whig star of 8t Stephens, turning from the 
dangerous garrulity of Wodrow, had condescended to borrow 
exactly, and without quotation, the phraseology of the con- 
ceited Laing : " On another occasion, a husband, whose flight 
he (Claverliouse) had arrested, was produced to his family, to 
be pat to death in the arms of his wife."* 

The historian of the Sufferings of the Kirk, was imbued 
with a strong hereditary bias in favour of rebellious fanaticism. 
His modem editor, Dr Bums, gives the following account of 
an incident occurring at the time of Wodrow's birth, which 
sufficiently indicates the relations subsisting between that 
worthy's father and the Grovemment; althougli this version, 
derived from the ex parte statement of the martyrologist 
himself, is not conclusive of the merits of the case: " At the 
time of the birth of her son, Mrs Wodrow was in the fifty-first 
year of her age ; and her death, though it did not happen for 
several years after, was then fully expected. Her excellent 
hnshand, obnoxious to a tyrannical Government, narrowly es- 
caped imprisonment, or something worse, in attempting to 

' Fox's Hiilorf , p. 1 30. 

• Hilt. vol. ii. p. 137 ; fint tditiop, IBOO. MuiiTeBllj, Lung hod ted Fox Inki 
this utter nonneUM ; and lery lazy it wan in the latter to copy Lung t<r6iilin. 
Tlie connequfDce it, ttut Fax's hiatorj ia left in the lurch,— saddled with the kb- 
anrd flgares of Lains, olio, in liis trcaitd edition, (1804), uliitmed of liis ronner fine 
writing, makes bii Rtlein|i( to etcapc from bimaelT, h; thus anuHding his verraoD : 
" On aaotbar occanoD, h liosbuid, wlime fliglil he bad arrested, was brvvgil back 
V> his family, to be put tii deslli in (ht prft/ncc of his wife." — Vol. i», p. HR. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 67 

obtftin a last iuterview with her. As be passed the town- 
guard house, he was watched, and soon followed by the sol- 
diers into his own house, and even into liis wife's bed-cham- 
ber where he was concealed. The officer in command checked 
this violence, sent the men out of the room, and left the houso 
himself ; placing, however, sentinels both within and without 
till the critical event should be over. In half an hour after, 
Mr Wodrow, at his wife's suggestion, assumed the bonnet and 
great coat of the servant of the physician then in attendance, 
and carrying the lantern before him, made an easy escape 
through the midst of the guard. They aoou renewed their 
search with marks of irritation, tlinisting their swords into 
the very bed where the lady lay ; who pleasantly desired them 
to desist, ' for the bird,' she said, ' is now flown.'" 

Moreover, this enthusiastic editor informs us, that, " In 
common witli all true-hearted Scottish Presbyterians, Wod- 
- row stood forward as one of the warmest defenders of the 
Hanoverian interest," Ac. ;' and then he favours us with this 

' Wodruw dedicnted his Mirtjrologj' lo George tUa Firsl ; and the »ii»iely Le 
dispUji far Toy.\ pnlronige and Approbation ia lery characteriatic. In a letter to 
hi* friend Dr Fraaer, wriltea in tlie month of February 1 1 2S, three yean after the 
pablication of hin niifnuM afMt, he ia Blill in the agony of doubt wlielbsr Die King, 
ur any nF the royal family, had eror loolted into hia lumbering toioes. Moat pro. 
bahly they ecarcely did ; and the idea of George the First studying the dreary ca- 
lainnie* la loo ludicruuB, " I Uu own," lie writes, " I am /barf tu know, if etar tin 
King haa liad aa much leisure ika lo looi oh my took. I think you iiTole lo roe tbs 
Prlncen had read aoRie of the Iti'il volume ; and, it may bo, liia Royal Highuen 
Ihe Prinm may have glanced at it ; and I can «y, bmide Ihe hoitoar and filtawiin 
1 had in my bournl duty to aend tlicm a book that concel'na tlila part of his Majee- 
'• domicioni, it will be a great aatiafaction to knoie that Itiey had any infonnalion 
ftixn it, of the TtilaKirr nt t ;>n-weiriN^ poyitk i^iril, tlial raged inthia poor country 
during the limes I deat'ribc." In a previous letter to the same, written in 1733, 
the year in wliich his second volume was published, he saya : ■■ ll 'a a vast pleasure 
to uw to Bud that her Hoyal Higbneiw, the Princeaa, has eondcecended lo look into 
Ibe copy I did myself the honour lo Mind hrr, and that, in any measure, she ia 
Mtiafied with it ; as aoon aa the •eeoiid volume is finished, it shall be carefully 
I Usnamitled." In the same letter, he adds : ** I did regret in the preface, that I 

look over my history, and that it's printed very mnch aa it flm 
drupl from my |>en ; and there luay be mime paiaagca iu it dial are nut so well 

all Hiifli I am moat willing; tfl retract." — jlimlreta Seutiea, First 

8eri*a> pp. 3IIK. 310. Wnlrow's modern editor. Dr Dnmi, ityt inooeeully enough, 

* The life and cormpun Irticvof Robert Wodrow, ,jiirf inio ■•Jjr Ufnio^, and aceoin. 

paoiod with luitable eupl'leiueiiutry illustrations, would form a muel valaabtt firi- 

[ M*l (0 tki npnUie of l.llrn. Wg sliould like tii see it. The value aould uol con- 



S8 MEHOUIALS OF TUF 

emphatic opinion, to whicli all will subscribe who are still 
inclined to bow to the Solemn League and Covenant as a pure 
emanation of the Christian miud, and a divine iuepiration for 
human government: — " To a man thus admirably qualified, by 
principle, by extensive information, by a habit of pereevering 
and accurate research, and by a native candour of soul which 
bade defiance to all the arts of chicanery, no literary nnder- 
taJcing could be more appropriate tlian that of the * History 
of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland,' during the days 
of prclatic persecution,"' There he here mighty fine words. 
tVe are not inclined to dispute that WodroVs literary under- 
taking was very appropriate to his accompUshmeuts. But as 
for his native candour of soid, we shall show cause for main- 
taining, that his honesty can only be defended at the expense 
of his intellect. 

With such antecedents and predilections, this clergyman's 
object, avowedly, was to compose that most apocryphal of 
chronicles, a grand Marli/rology, in support of a " persecuted 
Kirk and a broken Covenant." Raking together for that pur- 

■ist in Ntablistiing the aathnritj of Wodmw. His fishing in that letter at the Sd uf 
Febmsry 1 725, for royal fuTour, wu so tax responded lo, thkl, on Ibe 26tli of April 
1 72G, appears a royal order upon tbe Exchequer in Scotland, signed by Walpole, to 
pay to Wodrow the sum of £105 Sterliog, bennse he " did tuait timi (inM dedi- 
cate and prMort nnto ua his History of the Pereepution in Sciitland, from the Re- 
Bloralion to the Revolution, consisting of two large Tolumes in folio." It is amuung 
to nee how much Ur Bums makes of this tardy act of gratjlndo,— an hononr some- 
Kliat equivocally extorted : " Thus," be saya, " while the bigotted adherents of a 
penecuting dynasty were crying out most lustily against the humble Scottish pi«8- 
byter and his book, the highest personage in the empire was publicly nmferring 
on the said presbyter a moat BubstaDtisl mark of his regard, jvit beeatiK he had 
written a book which at once exposed the horrors of former reigns, and displayed 
by reflection and by contrsst, the blessing connected with the Hanoverian suecei- 
ison." — Memoir uf the Author, p. xii. Walpole should have made him a Peer. 
Dr Bums, by tlie way, is more cnthusinatic as a biographical illustrator than pro- 
found. He thus speaks of Bishop Burnet's notoriously jiaicAimutt) history : " The 
veradty of Wodrow has been farther established by (he testimony of liislorians at 
tiM time, and other published sources of evidence. BiAop Bunut fHtUiiStd his 
History of His Own Times immediately after onr author had given to tlie world 
his History of the SulTeringa of the Church of Sootland ; and these two works, 
however different and even opposite were the sentimenla of their autbotB, confirm 
each other in all the material transactions of the period." These authors some- 
times lied in nnison ; but they also differed esBentially, and Wodrow is welcome to 
all the contimiation be can obtun from the T^oililunioiu work of Burnet. 
' Memoir of the Author, prefixed to Dr Bums' edition of Wodrow. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE, 69 

rpose, from any quarter, however suspicious, a most Leteroge- 
[ UeouB magazine of materials, — accuracy, precision, truth, jus- 
tice, and common sense, the most valuable characteristics oi' 
History, apjiear as if absolutely excluded from the premedi- 
I tated design of this imgainly performance. Of a narrow mind 
I and very limited intellect, prone to the most senseless and illite- 
[ rate superstitions, and somewhat deficient in the quality of con- 
|. scientiousness, the fanatical author's bustling and laborious ac- 
f tivity became indeed most availing for the apology and eloge 
I of Scottish fanaticism. But it was by reason of the effrontery 
[ with which he proceeded to gloss iniquity, and confound truth, 
f to malign the high-minded, and sanctify the murderer. His 
Buccese was great, however, in the private acquisition of ma- 
I for illustrating that gloomy period of the iiistory of 
Scotland. He was a mighty hunter of wild documents, the 
outlying deer of history. His collection of manuscripts is 
valuable, and very voluminous. But, along with many wither- 
' ed leaves, dried branches, and prolific seeds, which the winter 
I <rf our discont«nt had scattered, he raked together a vast pro- 
f portion of mud and impure mattar, in the shape of what he 
called " Infonnations from credible witnesses," — unnamed and 
unknown, — and of this last it suited his purpose to make 
the greatest use. Hence his so-called history is absolutely 
rank with calumny. In compiling it, he piously proceeded 
upon a principle suggested to him by his friend and confi- 
dential correspondent, Mr Gleorge Redpath, a Hanoverian 
I Covenanter of hia own stump. This last, in reference to the 
rWork in progress, " humbly proposes," in a letter of instruc- 
IlionB to the historian, '■ that what is merely circumstantial 
night he left out, excepting where it is necessary for illus- 
litratiug the matter, or aggravating the crimes of our enemies."^ 
KKow, whatever this congenial counsellor may really have 
Bjneant by such advice, as the chief matter that Wodnjw in- 
mdcd to illuBtrftt« was " the crimes of our enemies," he prac- 
4ly interjireted the instruction thus, — SnpfM^ss every cir- 
lifiumstance, however well establiHhod, that may tend to con- 
I demn our friends, or to exonerate uur enemies, and record 
fworyt-ircumst-urice, hnwover illvoiiohetl, that maybe " neocR- 



60 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



eary for aggravating the crimes uf our eueiuies.' In fsimestt 
to his correspondent, however, it must be also noted, that, in 
the Bame letter, he says, " Where matters of fact are not weU 
attested, they should be entirely left out, or but slightly touched 
as common report*, and not even noticed hut where the case 
is extraordinary." The first instruction Wodrow interpreted 
to suit him, and the second he t-otally disregarded. 

Tlit'rc was another instniction, however, of a very different 
character, with which this Mr Itedpath favoured his friend ; 
but it was quite unnecessary. He referred him to the most pol- 
luted printed sources, for illustrating the merits of the case be- 
tween tlie Monarchy and the Scottish Covenant. The learned 
editor of Kirkton's history passes this just remark upon a classof 
publications which he had thoroughly sifted : " The principles 
of assassination being so strongly recommended in Napkthali, 
Jvs Populum vindicatum, and afterwards in the Hind let loose, 
which books were in almost as much esteem as their bibles, 
it is wonderful enough that mote assassinations were not com- 
mitted during those intemperate times." They produced a 
tolerable crop, however, as we shall presently find ; and no- 
thing but the energy of tlie executive, which brought each & 
storm of calumnious invective against Claverhouse, and (as 
Lord Macaulay has it) " men like him," prevented that deadly 
fruit of conventicle oratory, and clerical bidlying, from being 
multiplied fourfold. '■ I need not hint," writes Kedpath to 
Wodrow, " that there are very great helps to be liad in the 
Apohgetical Relation ; Naphthali ; the True Nonconformiste ; 
supposed to be the late Sir James Stewart's ; Jua Populi; the 
Bind let loose,; and other accounts of those named Cameron- 
tans; though the latter should be touched with great caution, 
as I find you have done the unhappy controversy about the In- 
dulgence, wherein I applaud your moderation and judgment." 
One of the chief prophets of the Cameronian school latterly, 
was Alexander Shields, a violent conventicle preacher, but 
somewhat of a coward, whose addled brain admitted no other 
idea of civU government than the Solemn League and Cove- 
nant. He was the anonymous author of that vile work, al- 
ready mentioned, " A Hind let loose." This man's history is 
somewhat odii^ving, and deservct; to be noted in reference 



I 
I 



J 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 61 

the unmeasured abuse which he vomited forth against the 
murdered Primate, because of his so-called apoatacy. From 
Wodrow LimsL-li". liis great admirer, we quote the following, 
which occurred in 1685, the memorable year of the death of 
the " Christian Carrier." 

" March 6th, Mr Alexander Shields, being examined before 

■ the Lords of Justiciary, ' did abitor, renounce, and disotim, in 
the presence of Almighty God, the late pretended declaration 
of war, in so far as it declares war against his Majesty, and 
asserts it lawful to kill such as servo his Majesty iu Church or 
State, Army or Countiy ^ and, August 6th, Mr Alexander 
.Shields, having signed the abjuration, owned the King's 
authority, but not upon oath, is remitted hack to the Council : 
And by their register I find {adds Wodrow) August 7th he is 
Bent under a guard to the Bass." Having thus saved his neck, 
this back-slider contrived to break his bonds, and join that 
murderous crew who rejoiced in the name of " Society People,'" 
and in the leadership of such saints as Renwick, Cargill, and 
Cameron. In 1686, Wodrow tells us, — " That excellent person 
Mr Alexander Shields was received by the Societies ; he had 
found means to escape out of his confinement, and made au 
acknowledgment to the general meeting of what he thought 
he had tforee vrrong before the Justiciary : He was extremely 

I welcome to Mr Renwick, and the more judicious people among 
them ; he was mighty useful to them, and much against some 

' of the lengths they ran to ; and came in heartily at the Re- 
Tolution, as I doubt not Mr Benwick would have done, had he 
been alive."' 

" The lengths they ran" muat have heen far indeed, if the 
" Hind let loose" was outstripped by them, in the deadly 
schemes and principles of covenanting anarchy. This Hind, 
or rather hound, would not indeed follow them unto martyr- 
dom ; but that work of liis, anonymously printed in 1G87, two 
years after his loyal and solemn abjuration, may he called the 
great Institute of the Kirk's Lj-nch-Iaw ; and therein assured- 
ly he makes ample and aa/e amends for what " he had done 
wrong before the Justiciary." He denounces the reigning So- 
vereign, and all that royal race from the time of Queen Mary, 



I 



^^^^L Con 



Cooanll Ihe index to Dr Bum*' •dilion nf Wodrow, 



62 MEMORIALS OF THE 

a« adulterers, miscreants, bastards, murderers, and parricides. 
The murdered Primate he execrates as a villain, a sorcerer, a 
murderer, and a beast of prey. He loudly proclaims the 
people's right of li/nch-faio in the teeth of an cBtablished exe- 
cutive ; and quoting John Enox as a practical approver of 
such frightful doctrines, breaks out into this scornful climax,^ 
" Yet now such a fact, committed upon such another bloody 
and treacheroufl beast, (as Beaton) the Cardinal prelate of 
Scotland, eight years agone, is generally condemned as horrid 
mwdei'' I Moreover, that there might be no mistake as to 
his own approval of the deed, he thus records it : — 

" That truculent traitor, James Sharp, the Arch-prelate, Ac, 
received the just demerit of his perfidy, apostacy, sorceries, 
villanies, and murders, — sharp arrows of the mighty, and coals 
of juniper. For, upon the 3J of May 1679, several tvorthy 
genilcTnen, with some other men of courage and zeal for the 
Cause of Grod, and the good of the Country, executed righteous 
Judgment upon him, in Magus Muir, near St Andrew's."^ I 

This railing Eabshakeh of the Covenant, who had taken 
precious care tliat " righteoiis judgment" should not be exe- I 
cuted upon him, had been well studied by Mr Wodrow, with 
whom he is an especnal favourite ; and they only who will 
undergo the penance of reading the Cameronian's insane pro- 
ductions, can sufficiently appreciate the absurdity of the 
following eloge of him, by the fanatical minister of East- 
wood: — 

" Mr Shield's was a minister of extraordinary talents and 
usefulness ; he was well seen in most branches of valuable 
learning ; of a most quick and piercing wit, and full of zeal 
and a public spirit ; and of shining and solid piety." He 
further characterises him as " a successful, serious, and solid 
preacher, and useful minister in this Church ; moved with 
love to souls, and somewhat of the old apostolic spirit."' 

> A Hind let looM, or an hiaUirinl reprnentation of tlie TeBtiraoniH uf tho 
CImrch of SiH'tliLDd for the interet of CAruf, with Iho true state Ihereor jn all ilH 
periods,-' *c. " Bj H Irae lover of Liberty" I 

This cowardi)' luiacrcaat meant kit arn libortf. See before. Lord MuiSuU^'b 
opinion of bim, p. 13. 

" Wodrow, HUt. Tol. It. p. 933. Wodrow appe»r» tu liOTt liuJ llicse sort of 
-s stereotyped /sr lAs nonet ; knd rie^ rtna. 



I 



VTSCOONT OF DUNDEE. 63 

That be Bbould tlms praise his own prototype in the walk 
of history is not surprising. For Wodrow never hesitated to 
give the best of characters to the worst of criminals, if it 
suited tlie scheme of his grand Martyrology. We have a pro- 
minent example in liis treatment of the romance of John 
Brown, to which we must presently reciir. Meanwhile wo 
present our readers with another instance, the too notorious 
facts of which did not enable Wodrow to mislead history quite 
80 far. 

If ever there was a scoundrel on earth, it was James Mit- 
chell, the assassin, who cansed the death of Bishop Honeyman, 
in the first attempt, which failed, upon the life of Archbishop 
Sharp. Originally excluded from the Presbyterian ministry 
as incapable, turned out of the house of Dundaa, where he was 
dominie of the lowest degree, for dissolute conduct, he subse- 
quently attached himself to the vilest companionship, that of 
the infamous Major Weir, and having passed through some 
hypocritical ordeal in the service of a she saint, ho joined 
the rebels in arms at Fentland, and, after the defeat of 
that miserable insurgency, had to skulk for his life. But 
the meastire of his iniquities were not full. He had now 
sufliciently qualified for saintship and martyrdom, although 
he had missed the Presbyterian ministry. So, taking his cue 
from the conventicle orators, and flying at the highest game, 
that which was most hkely to secure their patronage, lie 
directed his cowardly pistol agaiuBt the Primate. That ■wild 
fanatical preacher, and chronicler of the Kirk, Mr James 
Eirkton, was certainly not indisposed to bestow a far better 
character upon zealots than they deserved, and to cast corres- 
ponding approbrium upon the objects of their violence. Mani- 
festly, however, even that fond and foolish historian of Kirk 
troubles, neither felt, nor cared to express, any respect or 
igrmpathy whatever for Saint Mitchell. 

" One Mr James Mitchell," he says, " a weak acltolar,* who 
bad been in arms with the Whigs, resolves he will kill Bishop 
Sharp ; and for this provides himself with a case of loadeu 
[HfltoU. One day, after dinner, he waits for the Bishop as ho 

* Olmaoily raferriDg lo hit roJccUon u iaeapkbl* for tba miniatr]'. Tbe hiMtoTj 
of this ■■ mi n will be furthsr illaatnted in k lubMiiiKiit port of thne Mriaiiri>l>. 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



» 



I 

L 



64 



was to come from his lodging into his coach. At length down i 

comes Sharp, with Honeyman, Bishop of Orkney, at his back. 
Sharp enters the coach first, and takes his place ; then Mit- 
chell draws near and presents his pistol, while in the instant 
Honeyman steps into the coach-boot, and lifting up his hand 
that he might enter, receives upon his wrist the ball that was 
designed for the Bishop. So Sharp escaped at that time. 
After the shot, Mitchell crosses the street quietly, till he came 
near Niddrie's wynd head, and there a man ofl'ered to stop 
him ; upon which he presents the other loaden pistol,' and so 
the pursuer leaves him ; there he stept down the ^vynd, and 
ttiming up Steven Law's close, entered a house, and ehifting 
his clothes passed confidently to the street. Tlie cry arose, a | 
man was killed. The people's answer was, — ' It's but a 
Bishop' ; and so there was no more noise. The council con- 
vened presently to deliberate how to find the assassin ; but 
because that they could not do, thoy emit a proclamation 
offering two thousand marks to any that shall discover, and 
three thousand marks to any that shall apprehend, the assassi- 
nate ; and more they did not this day. This happened in 
June 1668." 

And subsequently, when Kirkton comes to record the 
assassin's death on the scaffold, which took place ten years 
afterwards, he tells us, — " Mitchell died avowing the act, and 
bXso jtistijying it; and, there was an end of his tragedy."* 

Now what does Wodrow make of this miscreant, who having 
passed through his various phases of low debauchery, diaboli- 
cal companionship, hypocritical sanctity, armed rebellion, and ' 
cowardly assassination, died avowing and justifying the crime ■ 

■ Tliia desperate rufHin, it seems, was prepared tn commit a secand attempt at 
tnurdDr, upou ihU ikccasion, had he been arrested. Thii Is not the spirit of a Saint 
and MartjT. 

• KirUloQ's Hislory of the Clioreh of Scotland, edited by Charles Kirkpatnek 
Shitrpe, pp.377, 384. 

Sir James Turner, also, liad furmerly seen Mitchell, and duly tppreciated his 
character. He atatea in his Memoir*,^" At Douglas 1 was accosted b; one 
Mitchell, whom I had never seen Iwfore, a prrachrr, but ho actaat mtaiitcr, who 
spared not to raU lyJicUnlli/ againit all a«thoritg, both Bupreme, and BUballora." — 
TNrur'f JUanoirt, p. IRS. The miscreant's declared iDcapacil^ for the ministry 
appears to have been Terjr notorious. Will Lord Macaulay reckon him among those 
irriftra piatanli who Here " driven mad by peraecntinn" t 



VISCOCtJT OF DUNDEE. 05 

F that gained him his Scoteli crown of martyrdom ? Wodroto 
[ justifies it too ! The eveiitmit murder of the Primate is the 
pot incideiit of WoJrow's martyrologics, and all connectt-'d 
therewith are of necessity exalted in hie ragamuffin army of 
martyrs, In narrating tho attom]itod agsassinatiou, whidt 
proved fatal in the end to the Bishop of Orkney, he takes the 

I facts from Kirkton ; but the godly character he bestows upon 

I the assassin rests upon his own ipse dixit ; which he is fain 
to fortify, however, \vith tho alleged testimony of a brother 

! zealot. His own testimony is truly characteristic : — 

" Mr James Mitchell was a preacher of the gospel, and a 
youth of much zeal and piety ; but perhaps had not these 
opportunities for learning and conversation which would liavc 
been use/id to him.^ I dnd Mr Trail, minister at Edinburgh, 
in the year 1661, recommending him to some miniatera in 
Galloway, as a good youth, that had not much to subsist upon, 
Uid as fit for a school, or teaching gentlemen's children* He 
was at PenlloMd; and is excepted from the indemnity, in all 
the three Usta we have seen. From what vwtives I say not, 
he takes on a resolution to kill the Archbishop of St An- 
drews,"" Ac. 

When Mitcliell came to pay the penalty of his enormities, 
the Dean of Edinburgh humanely wrote him a lett«r of exLor- 
tation, especially inculcating that his attempt to assassinate 
the Primate could not come from God, like the impulse of 
Phineaa as the hypocrite had protended, seeing that he Mitchell 
had failed in the attempt. The miserable culprit, in an in- 
aolent and canting response, attempts no reply to this home 

I thruat against hia blasphemous assumption of a divine mia- 

sion.* But the ingenious author of the history of the Kirk'a 

Bufferinga supplies the defect, and has thus answered the Dean. 

" People," he says, " could not but observe the rightoouancsa 

of Providence, in disabling Bishop Honeyman'a hand; whicli 



■ A diuDgonuouB ■lluniou to Ilia jilaiu Csct tli*l tliis aBnnTii had Iwen jodgvd, lij' 
pra^rtB"^ >ulhDrilf,iii«i)ahl<! of being ■ minister.— ilist. ii. 115. 

* Wodrow ii nreFul lo u; nothing of tlie reiiuU of S*inl MitclivH'* •< taushins 
(Mlllaiinn'a eliildren ;" or of liis di«gnircriil diimlsnal fmin tlip family of Duiidna. 

* The mntirea, maoifnitl}', worp ihrwi of a low and murdoroua miaerMlit. Bill 
It woald not liave niitcd the plan of Wodniw'a grand Martynlog]- to lay u. 

* See klilrhell'i leller, printed in Haiillac H/Jieim; f. IH. 



66 MEMORIALS OF THE 

was noway designed by Mr MituLell." "People could not 
but remark that that poraon who wrote against the truth he 
once 80 vehemently espoused, had a mark set upon kirn instead 
of his debaucher, and without nny design in the actor'' I ^ 

In plain language : The Almighty directly prompted Mit-i 
chell's attempt to assassinate the Archbishop, decreeing, how- 
ever, that he should fail therein, in order that he might unex-- 
peetedly hit the Bishop, whereby that equally sinning Prelate- 
should die a lingering death, the Archbishop, meanwhile, 
being reserved for a yet more horrible but no less provideiiti^-'< 
retribution, eleven years afterwards 1 

Wodrow, most disingenuously, would evade any fact how- 
ever unquestionable the evidence, and within his own reach, 
that tended to turn the tables, as regards the character of 
savage ferocity, against the privileged sect with whom alone 
Claverhouae had to deal in arms. Robert Hamilton, one of 
the fanatic leaders at the affair of Dnimclog, is understood to 
have been by birth a gentleman, but most undoubtedly he waa 
a ruffian by nature. Wodrow, who is constrained, however, 
in various pages of his history to pronounce him a coward, 
thus tenderly and evasively treats the truculency of his dis- 
positions. " Mr Hamilton in this action (Drumclog) discovered 
abundance of bravery and valour ; and, from this day's suc- 
cess, ho reckoned himself entitled to command afterwards 
wherever ho was, Uiough ho had no experience in military 
affairs ; and some reckoned him of a passionate and positive 
temj>er, I find some papers hlame him for one of the soldier's 
being killed after quarters given ; but how far this ia true / 
cannot determine; and tliey add, that, after this, his conduct, 
counsel, and courage evidently failed him."' 

Did Wodrow not know, or was the fact beyond the reach of 
his industrious research, that Hamilton himself owned the 
soft impeaohraent, and gloried in that renown ? Sir Walter 
Scott has collected an ample record of the circumstances : — 

" The commander of the Presbyterian, or rather covenanting 
party (at Drumclog), was Mr Robert Hamilton of the ho- 
nourable house of Preston, brother to Sir William Hamilton, 
to wliose title and estate he afterwards succeeded ; but, ac- 
cording to his biographer, Howie of Lochgoin, he never took 



I 



ok ^M 



TISCOCNT OF DUNDEE. 67 

rpossession of either, as lie could not do so ■witliout acfcnow- 
' lodging the right of King William, (an Jincovenanfed Monarch,) 
to the Crown. Hamilton had hcen bred by Bishop Burnet, 
I while the latter lived in Gtasgow ; his brother Sir Thomas 
, having married a fiister of that historian. ' He was then,' says 
the Bishop, ' a lively, hopefid, young man ; but getting into 
that company, and into their notione, he became a craclc- 
hrained enthusiasi.' Several well meaning persons have been 
I much scandalized at the manner in which the victora are said 
to have conducted themselves towards the prisoners at Drum- 
clog. But the principle of these poor fanatics, I mean the 
high-flying or Cameronian party, was to obtain not merely 
toleration for their Church, but the same supremacy wliiclt 
Presbytery had acquired in Scotland, after the treaty of Rjp- 
pon betwixt Charles I. and his Scottish servants in 1640, The 
I fact is, that they conceived themselves a clioeen people, sent 
' forth to extirpate the heathen, like the Jews of old, and under 
a similar charge to akoio no quarter. The historian of the in- 
surrection of Bothwell makes the following explicit avowal of 
the principles on which their General acted : — 

"' Mr Hamilton discovered a great deal of bravoryand valour, 
I both in the conflict with, and pursuit of, tho enemy ; but 
' when he and some other were pursuing the enemy, others 
flew too greedily upon the spoil, small as it was, instead of 
pursuing the victory ; and some, without Mr Hamilton's know- 
ledge, and directly contrary to Ms express command, gave five 
of those bloody enemies quarter and let them go. This greatly 
grieved Mr Hamilton, when he saw some of Babel's brata 
Bparer), after that the Lord had delivered them into their 
i bands that they might dash tliera against the stones. \n his 
I mon account of this, be reckons the sparing of these enemies. 
[ »nd letting them go, to be among their first steppings aside, 
for which he feared that the Lord would not honour them 
to do much more for him ; and says, that he was neither for 
taking favours from, nor giving favours to, the Lord's ene- 
mies.'' 



* Sir Walter Scott qnoMi, — " A true and impartial Account of the perwcutti 
PNubjrteriani in ScolUnd, their being in unia, and der«at at Botlitttll Brigg, ii 
te7>, b; WiUisn Wilaoo, late •cboDltnaBMr in the pariah of Donglaaa." Sir Wnl 



68 



MEMORIAIJ; OF THE 



" Sir Robert Hamilton himself felt neither remorse not 
Bhame for having put to death one of tlie priuonera, afixr l/it 
battle, with his own hand, which appears to have been a charge 
against him by some whose fanaticism was less exalted than 
Ilia own : — 

" ' As for that accusation, fket/ bring against me, of killing 
that poor man (as they call him) at Dramclog, I may easily 
guess that my accuser's can be no other but some of the houso 
of Saul or Shimei, or some euch, risou again to espouse that 
poor gentleman (Saul) his quarrel against honest Samuel, for 
his oiFering to kill that poor man Agag, after the King's giv- 
ing him quarter. But I, being to command that day, gave out 
the word, that jw quarter should be given ; and returning from 
pursuing Claverhouse, one or two of these fellows were stand- 
ing in the midst of a company of our friends ; and some were 
debating fur quarter, others against it. None could blame me 
to decide the controversy ; and I bUxs the Lord for it t« this 
day. There were five more that, without my knowledge, got 
quarter, who were brought to me after we were a mile from 
the place, as baring got quarter, which I reckoned among the 

I&st ste^ittgs aside; and seeing that spirit amongst us at that 
time, I then told it to some that were with me (to my best 
remembrance it was honest old John Nisbet) that I feared the 
Lord would not honour us to do much more for him. I shall 
only say this, — I desire to bless his holy name, that, since 
ever he helped me to set my face to his work, I never had, nor 
would take, a favour from enemies, either on right or left 
hand, and desired to give as few,'"' 
dia 
dre 
bjt. 
Hu 
. 



r iddn, verj' signifioDtlv, — *■ The reader who would aMllieiUie<iti tlie quolstion, 
)t consult auj other edition than lliftt of 1697 i for, tomrhoie or Mker, the 
■.r of llie Uat eJitloti has oniUtd this remarkable part of the narratire." 
Waller Scott addn,— " The preceding passage U extrBCled from a long Tin- 
dicatinn of his own oanduct, aitnt by Sir Rabert Hamilton, 7th December 1686, ad- 
dresBod to the anti-Popish, anti-Prelatic, anli-EraBlian, an ti -Sectarian, true Prea- 
b^'teriau remnant of the Charch of ScotUuid ; and Ihe BubBtance to be found id the 
collection, called ' Paitliful Contendlngs Displayed, collected and tnui- 
aeribed by John Howie ■ " Sm noIe lu Old Mortality, diajittr 1 7. 

Lord Macaulay had time eaay *cceea to authentic facts regarding this ruffian, 
Hunilton ; and he has judged faim, in hia hiBlory, accordingly, wilhant aharing any 
if the doubt expraMcd on Un mbjecl by Wodrow. *■ In a paper," he mys, 
" drawn up by Sir Elnbert HamitMn, tlic oracle of the eiircnic Cuvenanters, and a 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE, 99 

Thua we have determined, by Hamilton himself, the queation 
>f the cruelty of his acta and the truculency of hie nature, — a 
queatiou which the cautious and forbearing martyrologist would 
fain bequc-ath to the doubts of History, — declaring, " how far 
this is true, I cannot determine" I 



With Mr Wodrow, and indeed with every writer of his 
etamj), evea the most moderate impoaition of fines, under the 
published orders of Government, upon the seditious promoters 
of a " blood-thirsty," armed rebelliou, was lawless oppression: 
all killing even of *' ruffian" rebels, by the constituted autho- 
rities, whether with arms in their hands in the fields, or after 
trial on the scaffold, and even for crimes more atrocious than 
armed rebellion, were murders^ and assassinations, committed 
by the enemies of the Lord. On the other hand, the foulest 
murder or assassination, perpetrated in tlio most savage or 
cowardly manner, upon a member or adherent of the lawful 
Government, by any one pretending to the sanctity of the 
8ei:t, was the most venial of offences, a violence not only ex- 
cused but hallowed by the visibly directing finger of God ! It 
is not the morbid misdirected fervor of religion, (so called,) — 
the sordid bigotry, or the redundant use, and grotesque abuse, 
of scriptural phraseology, that will suffice to characterise the 
•ect called /inoiic,« in Scotland ; and who, at the period of the 
fearful struggle we have undertaken to illustrate, were usually 
I indicated by the now more flexible, and thoroughly respectable 
term JVhi(/a. The climax and key-stono of the character is 
their sanguinary violence, not merely in defence of their own 
'■ tenets and discipline, but in forcing the same upon others ft el 
Its ; their tendency to outrage, in their ever aggressive ob- 
stinacy, all laws human and divine ; their disregard even of^ 
' the semblance of truth in their deadly vitujierations ; and that 
L vile 8y8t<>m, arising out of such disorganization of legitimate 
[ government, whereby every man may claim a divine i 



^^L Dm. 7 



Uood-ikintg rujtaii, ClelancI » mentioned m haring been once tDogued wiili ilio* 
b)wti«a, but afurwarda a great oppoMr of th«ir Ici^nion;, Clalaiid |irolubly Jii 
Kot agTM with Hamilton in thinking it ■ Mcied dulj- (o cut tlie Uinnta of |iriM>iwr 
who haii bMii received to qiurti>r. See llaiuilton'i tetter In (he SerUrin 
7. 168Ji."— //«(, vol. iii [>. 377. »<.(*. 



70 MEUOKtAL^ OF THE 

to judge, and to execute juJgnieut ui>oii, liia ueighbtmr. 
Alas I the crimBon veiB, of the Kirk's Ijuch-law, cau he too 
distinctly traced, niuuing oii, through all the various forma- 
tions and strata of the Church as reformed in 8ootIaJid ; and 
the instances are but too many and coiisx'icuous, in whieh the 
worst of murderers, assuming fur their ywu savage ends the 
most sanctified garb of the sect, have been by them received 
as brothers, and their services acknowledged with scarcely 
disguised satisfaction and gratitude. 

With just that spirit of truth and ChriBtianity that might 
be expected from the admirer and copyist of the " apostolic" 
Shields, does Wodrow himself record Archbishop Sharp, Af- 
fecting the most perfect candour, pretending to the greatest 
forbearance, professing only to disclose some of the least fright- 
ful features of a character he feigns too villanoua to be fully 
unveiled, Wodiow artfully proceeds to lay a foundation for the 
constant ebullitions of hia venom against the murdered Pri- 
mate. That a zealot sliould be violent on the subject of a 
presbyterian minister having turned fmm the ways of the 
CJovenant to Episcopacy, and for ha\'ing obtained the highest 
episcopal prize in Scotland, — that he should put the worst 
constructions upon his motives in doing so, and grossly ex- 
aggerate the guilt of such apostacy, would bo nothing. All 
this is perfectly natural to the contention of rival sects, in 
politics, sacred and profane. But WodroVs slauder goes far 
beyond the limits of any such controversy. The Frimate was 
foully murdered. The most prominent clergymen, of tbat 
sect which it was Wodrow's object to sanctify, had first 
prompted, and then justified the deed. While the raging 
tempest of covenanting anarchy v,-as at its height, it sufficed, 
for the self-justification at least of those rampant zealots, that 
high above the storm the name of God should bo incessantly 
howled by those whose hearts were black with hate, and their 
hands red with murder. But Wodrow had a different and 
more difficult part to uit. The storm had subsided. The 
trick was stale, the cry was obsolete, which used to proclaim 
every vigorous «uppf>rter, nf a recently restored Monarchy 
(Struggling for its very cxiKt^'ncc, as a (ruculent villain, a 



VISCOUNT OF DCNOEE. 71 

bloody murderer, ao atheistical sorcerer; and every victim, 
however criminal, of his owu insaoe attempt to subvert that 
government, and all law and order, a martyr and a saint. 
That blatant outrage upon Christian truth, and common 
aense, had begun to lose credit oven with the least rational 
minds ; and there whs actually some danger of the intelligent 
coimnunity appreciating the calm autheotic narrative, and 
plain sense, of Sir George Mackenzie's " Vbidication." The 
mythical tyranny, and duplicity, of Charles the First, and even 
the sad reality of the intensely provoked severities of his im- 
mediate successors, or t)ieir advisers, in their desperate efforta 
to save the rudely assaulted throne, had paled before that 
grand inauguration of tlie zealot's millenium imder the House 
of Orange, — the Massacre of Gleucoe. Wodrow, himself a 
fanatic, undertook to vfrite up the old cause again, for the 
benefit of the Hanoverian auccesuion, and to give its meanest 
caliimiiies a permanent place, and credibility in History. 

But the murder on Magus Muir was no myth. It had to be 
faced by the diflciple of the " apostolic" Shields' as a terrible 
fact. There was no veiling a crime that ie yet burning like 
a coal on the foreiiead of unhappy Scotland. The chance re- 
mained, however, of infecting history with such a character 
of the venerable victim, that from him all human sympathy 
would be withheld, as from a wolf slain in the sheep-fold, or 
t % scorpion crushed in an infant's cradle. This was an adven- 
L ture not to l>e achieved by truth. 

' His hfe," says this mean and audacious writer, " until his 
[ arriving at tlie top of his ambition, I have read, written by 
t one of the after mfferera, a worthy gentleman : and should 1 
, give an abstract of it, the portrait wuuM W very Muc-k ami 

1 It ia uniuing lo contrut Lord Muuilajr'B <«dnut« of Alex*ni)er Shielda, witb 
Wodrair's, vhoM anlliDrit/ Ihe noblo hiBloriui, however, adopU, where it sniU him, 
■■ Dot lo be i|UO«tioDcd : " It in Sol ouy to oonceive tbkt fuuttidsm on bo liestcd 
to a higher toiD[>enituTe than that whioli i> inilieated hy the writiaga of Shielda. 
Aecording to him, it Bhoutd eeeni to be the fint duty of a Christian ruler to /wrx- 
CKl« Ui lie dcati eytry heterodox lubjeci, and tlio Bnt dutj of every Chriatian nib 
Jael to poniard a iietcrodax ruler. Yft there waa then in Scotland an entliuaium 
«gaipared with whieb the oathu^araa of tliia man waa Jiubnram" l—HiM. vol. iii. 
p. Its. Prcit; BiroDg this. And, pra;-, Bftainal wliom waa it, that the " petseeu- 
ting"" spirit of Clnrerlmiiw wrji dirrrlprl r 



^^H Ung"«I>i 



72 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Burprising." Thus jcsuitically professing to abstain, in mercy, 
even from an abstract, Wodrow forthwith proceeds to extract 
from the work to which he so vaguely refers, all the worst 
portions of the vilest scandal, and the lowest writing, ever 
penned, or that ever usurped the title of biography. It was 
written, he says, by an " after sufferer," a " worthy gentle- 
man," from which phrases, we may not be far wrong in con- 
cluding that his author belonged to that class of worthy gentle- 
men whom Alexander Shields lauds, and in those very terms, 
for murdering the Primate ; and that his " after suffering'' 
consisted, cither in skulking to escape the scaffold, or in cant- 
ing upon it, at his well-merited death. And from this worth- 
less source it is, that Wodrow derives all the most villanous 
features of the following cunningly constructed character : — 

" His dream when at the University : His taking the ten- 
der: His proposal to Oliver Cromwell, which made the Usurper 
to assert liim, very publicly, to be an atheist : His betraying 
Presbyterian ministers when at Court, and afterwards pursu- 
ing them for his charges : His baseness with Isobel Lindsay, 
as she declared in his face, openly enough ; and share in the 
murder of the poor infant: His perjury in Mr James Mitchell's 
case : His cruel life, and strange death, — ^would make a very 
black history: and as they were commonly talked of, so I find 
tliey were commonly believed by those who lived with and 
had access to know him. But this is not a place to insist on 
them. His great talents wore, caution, cunning, and dissimu- 
lation, with unwearied diligence ; these very much qualified 
him for his terrible undertakings. He got himself into the 
Archbishopric of St Andrews, as a reward for betraying his 
Church."! 

Hinc ilke lacrynue. The very fact of his being murdered, 
is here pressed into the service of overwhelming him with 
this concentration of venom. Besides being guilty of suffer- 
ing his " strange death," he is accused, as if it were a noto- 
rious fact, of the seduction of a female, the murder of their 
infant, and the desertion of the mother, upon no better au- 

1 HUt. i. 236. The foul source of this outrageously calumnious character, which 
pone but the most prejudiced mind would have palmed upon history, will be ex- 
posed in a subsequent Part of these Memorials. 



^ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



78 



tliority than the mere rarings, in a kirk, of a jjoor mad woman, 
perfectly uiidersttiod at tlie time so to be ; excidpatory details, 
however, into which Wodrow dared not L'nter, Oliver Crom- 
1 well " the Usurper's" assertion, is the evidence for the Pri- 
I toate being an aiheisi, at a time when he was honoured and 
trusted by tlio spotless Kirk 1 

But what, then, were the other features of this veiled i>ro- 
phet, which our merciful martyrologist was unwilling to dis- 
close ? Horresco refereiis. There is another famous collec- 
tion of Wodrow's, which bears the same relation to hia histo- 
ries, published and projected, tliat a monster midden does to 
I the fat acres it foments, — his AtuUecIa, namely, — from which 
wo now quote. ' 

" Upon a time when Archbishop Sharp was at Edinburgh, 
R member of the Privy Coimcil, and active in prosecuting cri- 
minally some men who had been at Pontland, he wanted a 
paper, which tended to a further clearing of the hbcil, which 
was in his cabinet at ^t Andrews ; and so dispatched his foot- 
man in haste to bring it, gi\-ing him both the key of his closet 
and cabinet, directing him distinctly to the shuttle whero it 
■ lay. The footman came off about ten o'cliick in a summer 
day, and was in St Andrews about four o'clock in the after- 
noon, having run very fast. When he opened the closet door, 
be saw the Bishop sitliug at a table near the window, as if he 
had been reading and writing, with his black gowu and tippet 
and his broad hat, just as he had left him at Edinburgh ; 
' which did suiTirise the fellow at first, tlmugh he was not 
ntuch terrified : For, being of a hardy frolic temper, or a little 
L hollowed, as we call it, ho spoke to him merrily, thus : ' Ho I 
j my Lord I well ridden indeed, I am sure I left you at Edin- 
I burgh at ten o'clock, and yet you are here Itefore met I 
1 wonder that I saw you not pass by me.' The Bishop looked 
I over his shoidder to him, with a sour and frowniing counte- 
nance, but siKhko not a word ; so that the footman runs down 
etairs, and tells the secretary or ihamberlniu that the Bishop 
[ was cume homo, He wculd not believe him. He (the foot- 

I Wodrow'a Anaiffla, t» almilj' atatml, »r« in ni anikll roluroec, in his own 
I iMtndvriting, unong th* MSS. in ih« Adnxata*' Library. The; ware printod for 
I < th* H»llUnd Club in IB!?, in four vnlumoi-. v> whicli our reference* -wh- 



74 MEUORtALS OF TUG 

man) averred that he aaw him ia bis closet, and tliat he was 
very angry ; and desires the chamberlain to come up 8tairn 
and be would sec bim likewise. So they came both up utaire ; 
but before they were fully up, they both saw tho Bishop stand- 
ing upon the stair-bc-ad, staring upon them with an angry 
look, which affrighted them in earnest. Witbin a little, the 
footman came up to the closet, and there was nobody there. 
So be opens tbe cabinet, and takes out the paper, and comea 
away in all dispatch to Edinburgh, and was there tlie next 
morning, where bo meets tbe Bishop, and delivered to him 
tbe paper, and told him the former story. Upon which the 
Bishop, by threats and pivrntsea, enjoins bim to secrecy." 

It might he supposed that Wodrow, who obviously records 
tills story for truth, and as bearing essentially upon the Bi- 
shop's character, and tbe propriety of bis being murdered, had 
obtained his valuable information from the two eye-witnesses 
of whom be speaks, — ]>erbaps some of Lord Macaulays " old 
men who remembered tbe evil days ?" No sucb thing. " My 
author," he says, " is the foresaid Mr J. G. ;' an informant, 
however, whom he nowhere names save by those initials, but 
whom he had pre\'ion8ly designed " a miuist«r who lives nigh 
to Montrose." 

Having afforded this nnansweralile corroboration of his apos- 
tolic friend Alexander Shields, who had formerly denounced 
the murdered prelate as being, among other accomplishments, 
" a sorcerer," Wodrow immediately proceeds to disclose him 
actually cheek-by-jowl with the Devil in propria persona. 

" At another time, Archbishop Sliarp presiding in the Privy 
Council, was earnest to have Janet Douglas brought before 
that Board, accusing her of sorcery and witchcraft. When 
slie was brought, she vindicated herself of that alleged crime ; 
declaring, though she knew very well who were witches, yet 
she was not one herself; ibr she was endeavouring to discover 
these secret hellish plots, and to countermine that kingdom 
of darkness. The Archbishop insisted she might be sent 
away to the King's plantations in the West Indies. She only 
fl}-opt one word to tbe Bishop. ' My Lord,' says she, ' who 
was y(m vnih yon in your closet, on Saturday night last, lie- 
Iwixl twelve htkI ore o'clock?' l']m" which the Bishop 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



75 



I changed hia coiiiiteiiance, und turned black and palo, and 
' tlion no more was said. When the Council ro80 up, the Duke 
of Kothes called Janet into a room, and inquired at her, pri- 
vately, wlio that person was with the Bishop ? She refused 
at first ; hnt he promieing upon his word of honour to warrant 
her at all hands, and that she should not be sent to America, 
she says, ' My Lord, it was ike meekle black Devil,' My au- 
thor is Mr P. Tulhdeph."' 

We are not given to understand that the above scene passed 
as a joke. Indeed, it was no joking matter to be accused be- 
fore the Privy Council of Scotland in those days of the crime 
of witchcraft. The accusation thus privately obtained from 
their prisoner of a like offence against the Primate himseli', 
vaa of the most serious nature ; and withal so delicat'e to deal 
with, that, it seems, the delater (as such accusers were then 
called) was by that enabled to keep her formidable inquisitors 
mutely at bay. We may presume it to have been Wodrow's 
Bago view of the affair, that, from this moment, the Duke of 
Rothes was sufiBciently convinced of his clerical coadjutor's 
diabolical cliaractor; and that, without any figure of speech, 
he did, in his own closet in Edinburgh, hold personal inter- 
views with the Prince of liars. This conclusion, however, is 
somewhat interfered with by the tone and terms of a letter 
written by the Duke of Rothes himself to tlie Earl (afterwards 
Duke) of Queensberry, at the moment when the former was 
first made aware of the murder of the Archbishop, and which 
lottcr contains tlie following sincere tribute to the memory of 
that unfortunate prelate. " As it is talked, those base unwor- 
tliy people in Fife, that have committed this assassination, 
tlireaten tlioy will follow the same example with sevt-rul per- 
sons in public trust, not sparing your humble servant. But I 
I am not afraid in the least for them. They are certainly but 
t very few Fife peopilo among thein ; but I am afraid some there 
were ; and I am very confident that moat execrable murder i\-ill 
I be discovered. Let the unjust world say what they will, he 
I was not only Lord Primate of this kingdom, but a faithful 
I subject, and a wuk and just person, and a mast emineiif pUhir of 
I (A« Chunk; and, I am sure, my friend at that rnto, that 1 do 

■ ^ii<i(ri;«>i, i. 104, 105. 



76 MEMORIALS OF TilE 

not know what to do since he is gone, but to revenge myself i 
upon all tfiat murdering sect" " I ^"ill hasten to Fife, that I 
may add my endeavours, with all the faculties of my eoul, for 
the discovery of tiiis late horrid murder."' 

The most revolting chapter of history (so caUed) ever 
penned, ia that which constitutes the third section, of the first 
chapter, of the third book of WodroVs " History of the Suffer- 
ings of the Church of Scotland." Was this murder one of 
their sufferings? He entitles it, " Of the violent death of 
the Archbishop of St Andrews, Saturday, May 3. 1679." At 
tlie very outset our martyrologist displays his colours, by cir- 
cuitonsly avoiding the appellation of murder; and the first 
sentence involves a justification of tlie deed. " The violent 
taking away of the life of that bitter persecutor, Mr James 
Sharp, at this time Archbishop of St Andrews, is a subject not 
a little misrepresented by Tory writers, and what was the 
occasion of much reproach to, and persecution of, the Pree- 
bytorians," Jesnitical and untrue in the glossing details, san- 
guinary in the spirit of it, no intelligent and humane reader, 
even without other versions than this author's to inform him 
of all the details, can peruse that narrative without a feeling of 
disgust at the narrator. How " Tory writers" could be guilty 
of " misrepresentation," simply by recording, with " energy of 
hatred," the too notorious facta of that foul murder, perpe- 
trated by nine miEana on the high-road, at noon-day, it is 
difficult to conceive. Nor, if we consider the conventicle 
hallelujahs that seemed to ascend from hill, or rather from 
Iiell, to heaven, when that whig triumph, long meditated, and 
twice before attempted, was at length accomiilislied, with 
every concomitant of baseness and horror, is it at all to be ' 
wondered at, that tho frightful subject of their exultation 
" was the occasion of much reproach to, and persecution (so 
called) of Presbyterians." 

Wodrow was credulous. Wodrow was superstitious. Wod- 
row believed in witches. What then ? So did all the world 
in those days. It was a law of the Cliurch to believe in 
witches; and it was the law of the Church and of the land ' 

It will appesr in » cabMquenl PkK uT 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. 77 

pto torture them, Doubtlesa the insane belief was wofuUy 
I promoted and prolonged by Wodrow'a own sect. The pru- 
f rient investigatioD of same liorrilile liaison between the Devil 
I uid a Scotch wench, was a 6eld day, or an upera uight, for 
[■ some of the coarser and more zealous spirits of the Covenant. 
1 No tabbies over tea ever enjoyed their scandal more intensely. 
I That ain of the Solemn League it is which gives such exquisite 
I' point to the climax in Bums' famous epic, so familiar to all, — 

" Evan Satan glower'd and fidg'd fu' fnin, 
And hotuh'd and blew ni' migbt und inun ; 
Till 6rat ne caper, syne nnitber, 
Tam tint hia reason a'thegithor. 
And roora out, — * Weel done Cutty-iarkI'" 

We may refer to the Presbytery registers paaaim. The first 
tnd most guilty party to that abomination of Scottish history 
was the zealous clergy ; the next, the zealous lawyers. The 
epoch is too horrible, too humiliating to contemplate. We 
can only now say, Grod forgive them all. Yet we must accept 
of our History, of our Law and Gospel, from such learned 
progenitors. 

But Wodrow's superstitious credulity as far exceeded that 
of the clouded intelligence of his times, and of the times be- 
fore him, as the falseness of his fanatical records surpasses the 
tmfairuesB of party libels. Bishop Burnet believed in witches, 
and revelled in hearsay slander, He was the old-clothes man 
of History. But he would have shrunk abashed from siime of 
WodroVa dull and dreary fables ; and have laughed to scorn 
his infinite gullibility. The notorious Lauderdale believed in 
goblins and witches. When constrained, by the ascendant 
,Btar of Argj'le, to rusticate in Holland for a time, he amused 
imself, in some of the Catholic establishments, scrutinizing 
the ceremony of driving the Devil out of possessed Nuns, and 
doubtless ogling the Nuns themselves. But this child of the 
Scotch Covenant and Solemn Leagtie, never lost sight of 
worldly cunning and common sense. He frankly declares, 
that, upon the occasion referred to, he " saw only some great 
Holland wenches hear exorcism patiently, and belch most 
abominably ; so if those were devils, they were windy de^'ils ; 
but I thought they were only [losseBdcd with a morning's 



^H but I 



78 



MEMORIAI^ OF THE 



draught of too new ale,"' But ae for Wodrow, poor creature, 
though belonging to a century lat-er, there waa no evidence 
too wortlilese, no fact however improbable, or impossible, that 
he would not receive, and set down for truth, if it only served 
to illustrate his " remarkable Providencee relating to Scotch 
ministers," or to " aggravate the crimes of our enemies." Is 
the man to be trusted, to be quoted as a reliable historian, who 
believed, and seriously recorded for truth, and as precious 
materials for Church History, such dtigrading trash as the ex- 
tracts we have already given from his Analecta, and as these 
other specimens wliich here follow : — 

" 1706 : Mr A. Simson tells me, that about thirty years ago, 
he had this account from the minister of Penpont and his wife, 
and from many others. The thing was notorious and hiovm. 
In the parish of Penpont there was a child found buried in a 
yard. The child was discovered when it was fresh, and the 
minister told of it ; who ordered the child to be raised, and 
brought to the church ; and caused convene all the inhabitants 
about, to see if they knew any thing about the child. After 
many had come, a man came near to the child, and the child 
l^ up its hand and poitUed at him ; which so struck his cou- 
science, that immediately he confessed to the minister, and 
all that were present, that be was the father of the chOd, that 
it was begotten in incest on his wife's sister, and, / think, 
that he was privy to its murder. He was secured and deli- 
vered to the Sheriff, and I think, the sentence of death was 
passed on him ; but, having means, he bribed the Sheriff, and 
got off." 

" 1707. In the year 1693 there was a gentlewoman who 
died at Edinburgh ; and, some hours after her death, the body 
being laid upon a bed, and dressed up in dead-linens, and 
there being a considerable number of gentlewomen in the 
same room, the corpse rose np, and sat upon the bed, in tlie 
sight of the whole company, and called upon a woman by her 
name, three times, who was sitting at the foot of the bed, and 
Bpoke, in the bearing of them all, these words, — ' For lying, 
backbiting, and slandering, of my neighbours, which the 

' Liudi^rdalB eiIibII be mors fully recorded in b Bubscquout Piirl nf these Memo- 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



79 



world thinks little of, I am, by tlie right«ous judgment of God, 
condemned eternally to tlio flames of Hell,' — and tlien pre- 
sently fell back, and spake no more. Mistress Hamilton, tlio 
laird of Househill's sister, who is my author, had this from a 
poraou who was present when tliis liapj>ened, — if I rightly re- 
member who is own cousin-germati, — viz., Mistreaa Grabame, 
married to Harry Grahame, merchant in Edinburgh."' 

Were such things permitted, we could not imagine a more 
instructive " remarkable providence relating to Scotch minis- 
ters," tlian the corpse of Bishop Burnet, in the presence of 
Wodrow and a seance of " old women who remembered the 
evil days," — in presenlia Dominarum, — rising from the dead, 
and calling upon the living Wodrow to list the fearful fato 
reserved for that " Ijing, backbiting, and slandering, which 
the world thinks but little of." 

Nor, it seems, had these miracles ceased at tho time of 
Wodrow's writing. According to his own exquisite narrative, 
the following demonstration, not only of the Devil's walking 
with Bishops by day, but couching with honest women o' 
nights, even on this sublunary scene of his machinations 
against mankind, was still in the progress of continuous mani- 
festation while Wodrow wrote. 

" A woman had her husband, who went abroad, and she 
heard no account of him for a year, or some years. There 
were some accounts came at length of his death. She fell into 
B very great concern, and frequently had that expression, — 
' Oh I that I might once see him' I After some time, one night, 
one comes to the door, and she opens, and, as she thought, it 
was her husband. Ho tells her a story of his great hazard 
and danger, and what liad kept him away so long. To bed 
ihey go. And within a little she felt him grow cold like lead, 
and began to be in a dreadful terror, and to sain (bless) her- 
self. Whereupon her pretended husband gave her a nip, and 
vanished. She fell in dreadful terror ; and the Devil, in tho 
Bhnpo of her husband, Jrequently appears to her; and when 
he does so, she has an intolerable pain t» the place where she 
was nipped; and it's that excessive, and her terror so great, 
that she is in hazard of making some concessions to the Devil 




80 MEMORIALS OF TMB 

when he appears, from the force of the torture. The minister 
of the phce, and others, are much concermed abomt har'^ 

These, and a hundred others such like, are anecdotes Toach- 
ed for, and folly credited by Wodrow ! Is the historical 
tongoe of such a chronicler any scandal ? Are we to accept 
from the literary work-shop of snch an artist as this, the cha- 
racters, fashioned upon any Tnlgar slander that suited him, 
of such men as Archbishop Sharp and Viscount Dundee? 
These stories of themselTes suffice to prove how mean was the 
intellect of the fanatical minister of Eastwood, and how worth- 
less his testimony, where he labours to destroy the characters 
of those public men whom to malign fell within the punriew 
of his undertaking. 

Tlie tragedy on Magus Muir is not that which furnishes the 
only instance of WodroVs historical system, of excusing, if 
not sanctifying the murderer, and, as a means to that end, 
calumniating the murdered. He had another case to deal 
with,— of a murder by some of his own sect of one of his own 
cloth, — ^in which we find his Jesuitical powers taxed to the ut- 
most, and his characteristics as a historian strongly brought 
out. 

The established clergyman of the parish of Carsphaim in 
Gklloway, Mr Peter Peirson, a brave and energetic man, 
anxious and not afraid to do his duty in those evil times, was 
on til at accoimt, murdered at midnight, in the month of De- 
cember 1684. Since the murder of the Primate, the country, 
especially the west of Scotland, had been in a fearful state. 
The curates were flying from their sacred offices, in terror for 
their lives. The Lord Advocate declares, and he is abundantly 
borne out by facts, " that no man who served the King could 
know whether or not his murderer was at his elbow, and they 
had reason to look upon every place as their scajffold, consi- 
dering the violent and cruel temper of their enemies." The 
market-crosses, and more especially the church-doors, were 
secretly placarded by the broken and fugitated rebels, with a 
declaration of war against the Grovemment ; proclaiming at 
the same time, as a moral obligation, that the King's authority 

* AnaUcta, i. 356. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 81 

should be disowned, and those who supported it, put to death. 
It is not Burpriaing that this pubhc proclamation, by the 
secret emissaries of fanaticism, should have occasioned the 
most lively apprehensions in the minds of the well disposed, 
and the most vigorous measureB of a monarchy in great peril. 
For their desperate audacity had been immediately followed 
by repeated midnight murders. 

None but those evil spirits among the fanatical preachers, 
who prom|»ted such deeds, attempted to justify them at the 
time. The distinguished whig lawyer, Sir John Lauder of 
Fountainhall, with all his bias against the Groverument, never 
dreamt of doing so. He recorded the successive murders, of 
the soldiers of the Royal Guard, of the Curate of Carsphairn, 
and of Captain Urquhart, as became an enlighloned gt-ntle- 
man, and a Cliristian chroiiiclev. 

" 20th November 1684 : The news came this morning to 
Edinburgh, that some of the desperate /anatics had, last night, 
fallen in upon two of the King's Life Guards, viz., Thomas 
Kennoway and Duncan Stewart, who were lying at the Srtine 
Abbey, beyond Blackburn in Lithgowshire, and murdered them 
moat btirbaromly : Whereupon the Privy Council ordained 
them to be searched for and pursued, if it were possible to 
ftpprehend them ; and called for Carmichael, landlord of the 

I house, and examined liim and otiiers. This was to execute 
what they (the rebels) had threatened in their declaration of 
war." 
"12th l>cember 1684: News came to the I'rivy Council, 
that the wild fanatics had fallen in upon one Pcirson, minister 
at Carsphairn in Galloway, a great delater (accuser) of them 
in his sermons, and killed him. They ridiculously keep mock 
courts of justice, and cite any they judge their inveterate ene- 
mies, to tbem, and lead probation, and condemn them, and 
thereafter murder them. And thus they proceeded against 
Nory, minister of Dunfermline ; but he kept himself out of 
their way." 
" January 1085 : The few handful of fanatic rebels left in the 
west turning ver// insolent, the High Treasurer (Queeusbcrry) 
to put a rub on Ctaverho'ise, who had been lately there in 
Derpraber la.«t, »nd rould not wholly siipprppn tbem, rauses 



82 HEHORIALS OF THE 

]iis brother Colonel James Douglas seleel out of his whola 
regiment two hundred of his prettiest men, and by order of 
the Privy Council sends them againet these rogues, that the 
glory of defeating them might fall to his share. And, accord- 
ingly, Douglas being one day in the fields in Galloway, with a 
Bmall party of eight or ten, he meets with &s many of the re- 
bels at a house, who kill two of his men, and Captain 
Urquhart, Meldrum's brother ; and had very nearly shot 
Douglas himself dead, had not the wing's carabine misgiven ; 
whereupon, Douglas pistolled him presently. Urquhart is the 
only staff officer this desperate crew have yet had the honour 
to kill. He was brought into Edinburgli, and buried with 
much respect. They came a company of them to Kirkcud- 
bright, and kUled two men; and caused a minister called 
Mr Sliaw to swear lie should never preach again in Scotland." 

About three months after the last of these successive mur- 
ders, there occurred the military execution, in due form of 
law, of a most incorrigible relwl of this very class, Lord Mac- 
aulay's hero, John Brovm. Were it really the case (an alle- 
gation to be presently brought to the test) that Colonel 
Graham of Claverhouse did, in that very same locality, use 
his own pistol against some rampant rebel, we may rest as- 
sured, that ho was not a moment too quick with liis weapon, 
any more than was Colonel Douglas. But no such event 
occurred. 

Now, mark WodroVs historical record of the atrocitieB 
which we have quoted- above, from those contemporary and 
most authentic sources. And first of the murder of Captain 
Urquhart. 

" January 28th (1685). The Coimcil direct a letter to those 
they had commissioned for Wigtoii and Kirkcudbright, about 
their processing such who had killed Captain Urquhart, and 
some with him. / know no more about it, than what is in the 
underwritten letter. It seems to have been some engagement 
Bome of the WandererM had with the Captain and liis party, 
wherein, it seems, the soldiers liave been worsted." 

This was an instance where the details would not suit " for 
aggravating the crimes of onr enemies." The incident hap- 
pened to lie on the blind side of Wndrow's powers of research. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



83 



But the more atrotioua murders of the gentlemen of tlie Life 
Guatde, and the Curate of Caraphaim, he felt compelled to face 
more elaborately. Our martyrologiat'a record of those sad 
events, is most discreditable to him, as'a historian, a clergyman, 
and a Christian. Deliberate and cowardly assaesinatione ought, 
in the eyes of such, to find no palliation whatever, from any thing 
that can be said agaiust the general character of the victims. 
But to indulge in the spirit of calumny against the murdered, 
with the object of extenuating the murder, is indeed deserving 
of the severest reprehension. All Wodrow's attacks upon 
personal character, are ex parte statements, of the most 
rambling and ill-vouched kind, generally gathered in the 
loosest manner from the most tainted sources, and utterly un- 
worthy of credit. He knew perfectly well that in this noto- 
rious ease of the murder of the Life-guard's men, tliere never 
was a pretext of self-defence, nor a doubt as to the cowardly 
nature of the crime, which he Ihus disposes of in the Jesuitical 
style ho usually adopts when conscious of the extreme diffi- 
culty of his apology. 

" The incident of the killing of Kennoway and Stuart put 
the managers upon new and yet more barbarous methods. 1 
have not so distinct an account of fhc murder of these two as 
I wish I bad ; neither can I say whether it was in self-defence 
or not ; but it is generally said it was premeditated by some 
persons in the neighbourhood, or Society i)eople lurking among 
them, they having lieen eeoerdy oppressed by Kennoway for 
many years ; and if this was an assassination, nobody ought 
to defend it." 

Having thus, as he supposes, sufhciently saved himself from 
the imputation of bestowing his own approval upon such foul 
deeds, Wodrow goes on to cover his victims with calumny, as 
if to hide the stains of that midnight murder. 

" They were both gentlemen, as the style was, of the Life- 
guard, and killed, as is said, coming out of the door of the 
house of Swine Abbey,' in the parish of Llxingstou ; and after 
the most narrow search that was made, none of the acton 
could ever be found ; but 1 am assured, the Society people 
refused to admit some persons to their fellowsbipB whom they 



> Thpy vrre murdereJ " 



Ir W.."-SirG. Mirken 



84 KtMOBIALS OF THK 

suspected to I>e concerned in this murder. I have no account 
of Stuart ; but Kennoway's oppresBions in Livingston, "West 
Calder, and that neighbourhood, from Pentland to this year, 
have been in part noticed ; and I ehall add a few other well 
vouched instances of his former carriage." 

Our martyrologist then proceeds, Tnore euo, to enumerate, 
and to exaggerate into crimes of the deepest die, this gallant 
and loyal soldier's successful activity at the battle of Pentland, 
and on various other occasions when rampant or lurking rebel- 
lion demanded his energies in defence of King and Constitution. 
To this rubbish of calumny he adds his usual seasoning of 
abuse in these terms, — " Indeed, he was notoriously wicked 
and profane, a known adulterer, and a fearful drinker, and 
blasphemous cursor and swearer ;" and then he winds up with 
this precious specimen of Wodroivana : — 

" This is all the account I can give of tliis matter ; and I 
do not set down these things to vindicate the actors, but to 
show how righteous the providence loas, that this wicked man 
is cut off in the midst of his days and projects, however blame- 
able the persons might be in their manner of doing it. Before 
I leave those two persons, I only insert the Council's act, 
December 9th, 1684, anent their widows, to show the concern 
they showed for the relatives of such as had been active in the 
peraectdion : — ' The Council having considered the petition of 
Janet Stuart, relict to Thomas Kennoway, one of the gentle- 
men of his Majesty's guard, and Jean Jaffray, relict to Duncan 
Stuart, another of them, lately inhumanly murdered and 
butchered by some desperate rebels and fugitives, at the house 
of Swine Abbey, in the night time, do recommend them to 
the Treasury for charity.'"' 

We pass on to a yet more flagrant instance of Wodrow's 
historical system, of maligning the murdered, in order to ex- 
cuse the murderer, — the case already referred to of Mr Peir- 
Bon, the cnrate of Carspbairn in Galloway. 

This reverend gentleman, being of a fearless nature, refused 
to be driven from his manse, and his sacred duties, either by 

1 Wodrow-. HiBt. iT. 152, 
[hU rNommeodatinn, not k i 
}frttciiti»g tjiirir. 



VISCOUNT UF DUNDEE. 8& 

the tLrenta or the deeds of these assassins. Agaiust the hor- 
rible system of Conventicle lynch-law, he set his face, and 
dared to raise his voice. The hill preacher might suggest and 
sanctify such doings, but he denounced them in the face of 
man and in the name of God. Their threatened advent against 
his own life, he declared he dreaded less than the noise of rats 
and mice in his own solitary dwelling ; and, yet more daring 
announcement, he ventured to tell these lawless and sangui- 
nary fanatics, that the very papists were better subjects than 
they were, and might afford them an example of Christian 
charity and conduct. From hia pulpit he rebuked and de- 
nounced all such characters, as the murderers of Archbishop 
Sharp and of many other victims since that catastrophe ; and 
he rendered the Government such assistance as a clergyman 
might in bringing to light and justice those murderous ruffians 
whom Wodrow so fondly calls " Wanderers," and the " suffer- 
ing remuant." The unflinching front which Mr Peirson thus 
presented to all this villany, was liis doom. He appears to 
have been somewhat rash in braving the danger. He lived 
alone in his manse, without other prot-ection than the arms 
with which he had provided himself. " Mr Peirson," says 
Wodrow, " was an unmarried man, very blustering and bold, 
and used openly to provoke the poor people by saying in public 
companies, — ' He feared none of the whigs ; nor, anything 
elao but rats and mice.' He lived at the manse alone, without 
so much as a servant with him, and kept still a number of 
fire-arms in his chamber." Surely a very necessary precaution 
under the circumstances. Alas ! it proved unavailing for this 
courageous man. 

In the month of January 1G85 " The Council orders the 
Advocate to pursue the parishioners of Anworth for affronta 
done to their minister ; and the parish of Carsphaim for the 
murder of their minister by some skulking rebels." Wodrow 
does not like to hear his friends called names. The Govent- 
ment, and the intelligent and sane portion of the community 

I gave the deed its right name, — a foul, cowardly, and sacrile- 
gious murder, perpetrated by a band of skulking rebels. There 
B no rational doubt al>out the matter. Wodrow, however, 

t «et* down tin' scand'il (not tc he hidden) to the score nf 



eb MEMORIAia OF TDE 

grievances of tbe Sainte agaiust the Tory defamers 1 " I know 
nothing.' says that innocent, " anent the affront done to the 
minister of Anworth, and eay no further about it." Had the 
affront been to Saint Mitt;lieil, or Saint Shields, or Saint Wil- 
liamson, or Saint WcIbIi, or Saint King, or Saint Cargill, or 
Saint Henwick, or Saint Cameron, — being the Saints who pro- 
moted ench " affronts," tlieir faithful martyrologist would have 
Jbund facts somewhere, rather than have said " no further about 
it." Murder -wiH out, however, and he must face that of the 
uninipeached Curate of Carsphaira, as he best can : — 

" But the murder of Mr Peter Peirson of Carsphaim," he 
says, " at the manse there, ia a fact whereof no j'vst accoimt, so 
far as I know, hath been yet given to the public ; and this, 
with the murder of Bishop Sharp, are generally charged upon 
Presbyterians, as proofs of their practising the hellish and 
Jesuitical principle of assassination," The public were in 8 
full possession of the notorious facts of the brutal murder of 
this clergyman, as of that of the Archbishop. They needed 
not to be enlightened by any Jesuitical version of either, from 
the minister of Eastwood, in the century after the events. 
Nor is it the case, that the whole lieges of the Presbyterian 
persuasion, though too apt to be hoodwinked and misled in 
such matters, were pri\-y to, accused of, or made responsible 
for, such enormities. The guilty parties were, the Conventicle 
preachers and pamphleteers, who violently promoted, and 
quoted Scripture for the divine origin of, these diabolical 
crimes ; some debased rutfians, such as Saints Mitchell, Ra- 
thillet, and Russell, hanging loose upon society, and ready to 
take their murderous cue from such prompters ; and other 
hot-headed, weak-minded zealots, of the stamp of Wodrow 
himself, who excused, softened, and too manifestly favoured 
the foul deed wlien done. 

And what is Wodrow's " just account" of this murder ? 
Four or five scoundrels, whom he names, combined to invade 
the dwelling of this solitary clergyman, with loaded fire-anns 
in their hands, in the dead of night and ol' winter, " to force 
him," says Wodrow, " to give a written declaration that he 
woiild forbear instigating their enemies, and other violent 
coiivscp, and deter him from them in time tofonie, still expressly 



VISCODNT or tPOKDEE. 



87 



declaring they would do him no bodily harm." According to 
the martyrologist's own account, this armed bands of niffianB 
forced their way at night into the dwelling of this lonely curate, 
who, suddenly arming himself, makes a feeble show of defend- 
ing his door and his life. Without a single act of aggression on 
bis part, or a condition of mercy offered to liim, the intrepid 
clorgjtiian, who had disdained to follow the example of Mr 
Nory, and others, by deserting his post, and had only erred in 
fearlessly doing his duty, is shot dead on his own threshold. 
These facte are gathered even from WodroVs carefully con- 
cocted relation ; and not all the disingenuous glossing with 
which he attempts to justify it, by alleging a previous det«r- 
minatiou of this armed band " to do him no bodily harm," and 
that some of these conspirators thereafter " expressed their 
detestation of the fact," can leave any other impression upon 
tlje rational mind, than that these are flimsy pretexts super- 
induced upon the plain fact-s of this premeditated murder, in 
which the actors themselves gloried at the time. 

Neither does their friendly chronicler trust entirely to that 
species of extenuation, — that they did not tnean to do il. It 
must also be impressed upon the Christian reader that the 
murdered clergyman deserved that they shovld do it. " He 
was," says Wodrow significantly, " a surly, ill-natured man, 
and horridly severe; he was openly a favourer of popery, and 
gave shrewd enough signs of his being poptshly inclined,^ by 
defending not a few of their peculiar tenets; he was a notorious 
in/ormer, and instigator to all the violences in that country."* 
Having thus put in a plea for the murderers, at once calum- 

■ " What IB 1 P»pUl t Tha word !■ not a word of definite ■ignjficition, eithor 
Id Uw or in Iheology. It is marely a popaUr niclinune, uid meuiB very different 
IhingB in different moBtha." — Lord Maeaalai/, Hist. vol. III. p. 199. Yet tlie 
whale pretenuon of the CnvenaDtera, to being pnr attUiaci the ddenderH uT Uir 
hitb, And ttutt wUicli su uaaj uliuil as h ituificient apology for all tlicir vialeiit 
uid traculent proooedingn, U based upon their cimBtant lue and ahuae of that " po- 
paUr niekDune." 

> Thii ipiriled clcrgjuun did his bent lo reprcra the mon outrageous viul<.'iic<.-!i 
of tliu western fanatiea, b; endcavoaring to bring the aotiul |ierpetraton (o juatiL-r. 
Tliereforo Wodrow brands him with the vagnelj' abuiuve term, " a nolorioua iii. 
furmor ;" and the actiTs meaaurea adopted by Government la save Kiciely, and b> 
proleet tlic state, he lamis " violences.*' Doubllesa ihero are Bome who will call 
the de<«piMlinn of "rsini > " vwlcnno," snit llie deopilalfd a martyr. 



88 MEM0R1AI5 OF' THE 

uious and irrelevant, the martjrtilogist tliiiika it iieceBsar^ to ' 
wash his hands in the v^ry puddle he has made. " Those 
things I do not at all notice to vindicafe the fact I am going 
to relate, for I abhor and detest it ; hiit that the reader may 
know the true state of this mfttter, and what unwarrantoble 
provocation this iU man gave."' 

Such is Wodrow's stereotyped style for defending liis murder- 
ous martyrs. The murder of the Archbishop of St Andrews, 
of the two gentlemen of the Lifeguard, and of the Curate of 
Carsphairn, are treated by liim precisely ui>on the same plan. 
There is a transparent attempt to justify all these murders, 
by calumniating the victims; and with no better authority 
for the calumny than the raunlcrers themselves, or their 
aiders and abettors. Had this historian, as he parenthetically 
pretends, really abhorred and detested these crimes, it is im- 
possible that he would have recorded them as he has done, or 
have so anxiously seized the very opportunity for emitting 
his rancour against Christian pastors, and brave soldiers, who 
fell under the cowardly bauds of banded assassins. 

We know no labour more oppressively disgusting, than, to 
search through Wodrow's voluminous and intricate collection, 
of scarcely decipherable manuscripts, in order to discover, if 
possible, the private autlioritiea upon which ho professes to 
rely. His own pretensions to great accuracy, founded upon 
the vaguest references to " my informations," and " credible 
witnesses," must of course pass for truth with a world of 
readers, te whom his alleged proofs are practically inaccessible. 
We have a striking example in this very version of the mur- 
der of Mr Peirson. " I shall give," he says, " a plain account 
of the matter of fact at Carsphairn, which I have from a 
gentleman of undovhted credit, who had the details of this 
matter from the persons ooncemed in (his wickedness; and 
another concurring testimony from John Mathison, a very ju- 
dicious and worthy elder in the parish of Glencaim, lately 

' The eoneluaiDn of tbe Beulciiw is msnircHtly intended *■ lo viudioKle Ibe bet." 
It would bo tin vindication were it inie. But it U not true ; for tlie clergyman of 
C«npililini had neither given " univarruitabie pruTeeation," nor wa« lie an" ill 
mull,"— ■ tei'iTi UBeil hy (ho rnlilni Ilium Wodrow In r'gnify every tiling tint ii b«<t, 
an<l n.,i'lliv nrdi'Slii. 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 



89 



*■ dead, who had his information likewise from the prraona pre- 
tenl." The credit of witnesses who kept such company can 

' scarcely he " undoubted." But having been so fortunate aa 
to discover the " gentleman of undoulited credit's" letter 

I among Wodrow's manuscripts, we shall allow him to speak for 

1 himself, by here giving the precious missive precisely as we 
find it written ; — 



" Rev. & Dh. Cirss. 

' T have been under gi'aveish pains since I sau you ; every 

I day but two ; or then you might have hard from me sooner. 

I give you the account from tho best informatione its possible 

to be got, viz. from Robert Dun in Woodhoade of Corsphaimo, 

and John Glark, tlien in that parish, miw in Glenmont, in the 

parish of Strathone, — anent the curat's death of Corsphaime, 

which tkeyh&d from the actorii own mouth, — James M'Michaell, 

formerly fouler to the luird of Maxweltoune ; Robert Mitchell, 

in the new parish of Cumnock, nephew to Mr James Mitchell 

ipAo suffered; William Ilerron in the parochin of Glencaime 

H in Nithsdalc; Rodgert Pedzen, in parochin of Sauquair. I 

■ pairted from the above Johno Clark in Muirbrock, three miles 

from Corspliairno kirk. Upon a night neare the middle of 

I November 1684, being certainly informed that Mr Peter Pear- 

eone, said curat, kcept fyre armcs in his house, and was hard 

I any he fcard non of the whigs, nor any thing else bot rate and 

' mice ; he lived alone in the manse of Corsphaime, shewing 

\ there ahreiod signs of his being a favourer of poperie ; ami said 

I to Nicolas Fergusone, spouso to James M'Turk in holme of 

I Daliitihaime, several exprenstmis in favour of purgatory and 

I papists ; and told, that papists were better subjects than they. 

j The above named 4 personee went to the manso of Cors- 

\ phaimc ; Robert Mitchell going befor the other 3, rapped at 

the door, and hard nothing; hut, in a littlo time thereafter. 

tlie door was a little opened by Mr Pearsono ; on which James 

I H'Hiclmel fyrod ane pJHtoll at some distance, least Mr Pcar- 

1 fone should have Jyred Jirat; with which sliot the curat was 

I lulled deado; and in all tj'me thereafter that aotione was so 

[■ detested by the wbigs, they nevor allowed any of tlie said 4 

I t» kiT'p .'bi-isliaii cnniniiinioii uilii tlinii ; ami il w;>s rviniirk- 



90 



UEMORIALS OF THE 



able that 3 were all killed by tlie King's forces befwre the next 
yeare; and Rodgert Pedyeu, became a dragoon in Captain 
Strachan's troup, who was thought to have l>een a rogue the 
wholl tyme of his being with the whigs ; and informed the 
forces of the refuging places, and prompted up that other 3 to 
fall on that unhappy actione. I have been quite out of con- 
dition to doo any thing farther anent the Sufferings since 1 
saw you, on accoimt of my gravel, which will in all proba- 
bility shorten my days,"' 

This mean document, of the very lowest stamp a.s proof in 
support of those parts of Wodrow's version which are in- 
tended to extenuate a crime too notorious to be concealed, is 
dated 16th June 1715, and signed only with the initials J. C. 
It is a perfectly fair specimen of those written " informations," 
and " attestatioTie' unseen by, and anonymous to the public, 
by means of liis vague references to which, Wodrow not only 
succeeded in placing himself in the worm-eaten throne of 
Scotch fanaticism, but has even obtained the homage of 
suclt illustrious historical essayists as Mr Fox and Lord 
Macaulay. His correspondent in this instance appears to 
have been a relation of his own ; but Wodrow is not so frank 
as to name him. Neither does he venture to disclose the date 
of a document of which he adopts tlie general details, and 
some of the very phraseology, in his own narrative. The date 
would have called attention too distinctly to the fact, that his 
"just account" was derived from information obtained thirty 
yeara after the events. Moreover, he suppresses the signifi- 
cant fact, contained in the letter of his informant, that the 
leader of the ruffian band, Robert Mitchell, whom he names, 
was a nephew of the ruffian who attempted to murder Arch- 
bishop Sharp. 

It would be most instructive, were it possible, to place each 
of Wodrow's scandals, which he strings together m his weary 
chronicles as a boy threads eggs, in immediate juxtaposition 
with the relative scraps of documentary evidence upon which 
he so artfully founds. Any circumstance, be it a date, or 



' Wodrnw MSS. in Advocate'* Library. TJi«re i« 



A 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



91 



ame, or an expression, likely to mar the desired effect of 
I the testimony, is sure to be omitted. The foUowing absurdity 
ftg;ainst Graham of Claverbouee, is intanded to swell the cata^ 
logiie of his " cruelties." 

" James Brown, in the parish of Coulter, was very barba- 
rously treated about the middle of June this year (1685), of 
which I have before me an attested account. When fishing, 
he was diacovered by Clavcrhouse when ranging up and down 
the country, and apprehended. A powder-horn was found 
upon him, and tluxt was /ault enough. Claverhouse declared 
he was a knave, and must die. Accordingly, six of the dra- 
goons dismounted, and he is set down before them to be shot. 
By the intercessiou of the laird of Coulterallers, providentially 
|»resent with Claverhouse, his execution was delayed till next 
day, and James curried away by the soldiers to the English 
border, aud from thence to the tolbooth of Selkirk, being all 
the while bound with cords. After some time's imprisonment, 
he happily escaped."' 

It Beems, then, that " Bloody Clavere,'' even in the very 

moment of his murderous impulses, was accessible to the voice 

of humanity, if it happened that some douoo west country 

laird was " providentially present" %vith him at the time. 

But how came the inexorable " murderer" of John Brown in 

the month of May, to part bo easily wtth his prey Jam^s 

. Brown, in the month of June thereafter ? And what means 

the story, that the execution was only " delayed till next day," 

and yet that he was immediately carried to the tolbooth of 

Selkirk, and was therein confined for some time, until he broke 

hia prison ? Of all tins, Wodrow tells us, " I liave be/ore me 

I an attested account." Docs the account bear that no one but 

I Claverhouse exerciseil jurisdiction in this aflfair? Who attests 

the account ? Upon what authority ? With what details, 

aud of what dale ? 

Bound intu a little old mouldy volume of Wodrow's collec- 
tiouB, we find an isolated scrap of closely written manuscript, 
I its dimensions about three inches by two, which is there left 
I to tell its own stciry, as foUoWH : — 



iv.|..Kn- 



92 UEMOIUALS OF TME 

"James Brown, weaver in the parish of Culter, as he was 
fishing upon the 18th day of June in the year 1685. Clavers 
with three troops of horse apprehended him ; and there being a 
powder-horn found upon him, Clavers said that he wbb a knave, 
and therefore must die ; and accordingly six eoldiera were 
commanded to light from their horses to shoot him ; but the 
laird of Cultcrallers being providentially present -with Clavers, 
intreated him to delay the execution of his sentence for tha 
space of twenty-four hours, which was granted. But the said 
James Brown was carried alongst with the soldiers to the 
English border, and from thence to the tolbooth of Selkirk, 
all the time being tied with cords, where he remained a pri- 
soner for the space of (a) month, during which time the 
Magistrates mani/ times urged him to take the test, which he 
refusing, the Magtstrafes said that he was a knave, and there- 
fore should be put to death ; but that, within some Jew days 
Ifiereafter, he made his escape out of prison. This declaration 
is made before me James Forrester, minister of the Gospel at 
Culter, the eighteenth day of April 1712 years, and subscribed 
by the said," — 

"Ja. Forrester."' 



A declaration, not said by whom emitted, only subscribed by 
the attestor, and that too in the year 1712, of events said to 
have occurred in the year 1685, — such is the evidence in sup- 
port of this ijoiut of dittay against Colonel Graham ! But 
why did Wodrow suppress so much ? Why did he suppress 
the very important fact, contained in the manuscript before 
him, which in other respects he copies verbatim, that the 
Magistrates of Selkirk had become the responsible parties for 
this alleged barbarous treatment ; that they had " many times 
urged him to take the test," and that his obstinate refusal to 
do 80 it was that put this delinquent's life in jeopardy ? Be- 
cause the facts go to justify Claverhouse, and lead to the 
rational conclusion, that the prisoner had refused to abjure 
tlie published, but anonymous incentives to murder, doubtless 
put to bim by the military commander also, and had in reality 



■« MSS., Adro.-.u.,-' Lib, 



d 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 93 

r"beeii merci^Ui/ dealt with. The details were suppressed, be- 
I cause they happen to he the very reverse of " necessary for 
L aggravating the crimes of our enemies." 



To disproye absolutely, and in detail, the long catalogue of 

I calumnies, of which Wodrow's vicious history is composed, — a 

1 history so much relied upon and bo rarely tested, so often quoted 

I and BO little read, — would indeed be a difficult undertaking. 

It involves the task of proving an interminable aeries of nega- 

[ tives, in refutation of Wodrowana, which that zealoua partizan 

records for the most part with an assumed bre^nty that forme 

I their best protection. Happily, however, the means of precise 

, and complete refutation ia not altogether awanting ; and no 

> one witness, of all the pestilent " Cloud of Witnesses," that 

bave poisoned History on the subject of Scotland's troubles 

with her Kirk, has better earned a contemptuous dismissal, 

under the legal brand, FalsKm in unoftdsum }n omnihus, than 

the minister of Eastwood himself. Let us examine his record 

of the martyrdom of Saint Steel : — 

" In December this year (1686) David Steel, in the parish 

I of Lesmahago, was surprised in the fields by Lieutenant Crich- 

ton ; and, after his surrender of kimeel/ on quarters, ho was, 

in a very little time, Tnost barbarously shot, and lies buried in 

I the church-yard there."' 

In thus curtly recording this " instance," Wotlrow had nut 
[ anticipated the possibility of the accused himself publishing 
I bis own detailed accoimt of the very incident ; and, obviously, 
I without any reference whatever to Wodrow's false version of it. 
[ Nor can we refrain from expressing surjirise, that the martyro- 
i logisfs modern editor, however lavish of his illustrative notes, 
\ hae omitted all notice of the story as we have it in those well 
Imown Memoirs of Captain Creichton, compiled for him, from 
\ bis own narration, by Dean Swift, and latterly edited by Sir 
' "Walter Scott. 

It is manifest from the context, that neither the hero of 

I those Memoirs, nor his patron the Dean, were cognizant of 

Wodrow's version of the incident ; his great marlyrology being 

at that time in very little repute. Nor, tbronghont Captain 



u 



UEMOKIAI^ OF THE 



Creichton'a Memoirs, is there the slightest attempt to conceal 
or extenuate liis own uncompromising liostility in pursuit of 
the muirland martyrs, or any of tho harsh and reckless fea- 
tures of his professional activity in that deplorable service. 
Had he shot David Steel with his own hand tlie moment he 
caught him, no one who peruses those unreserved and graphic 
revelations can doubt for a moment that he would have so 
reported the matter to hoad-quarters, at tJie time, and have so 
narrated it to Dean Swift in after years. Now, the truth ap- 
pears to be, that, although slain in the fray, and with arms in 
his hand, David Steel was not shot at all ; Creichton was not 
present at the moment of his death ; there was no question 
of quarter ; and the only shot fired upon the occasion was by 
Bteel himself I Captain Creichton thus described this martyr 
to Deau Swift ; and his account is of the more importance, 
that Wodrow did not consider the case to be one in which the 
detaih would serve " for aggravating the crimes of our 



" Tliis man was head of the rebels since Airs moss, having 
succeeded to Hackston, who had been there taken and after- 
wards banged, as the reader has alreiwly heard,' Steel, and 
his father before him, held a farm in the estate of Hamilton, 
within two or three miles of that town. When he betook him- 
self to arms the farm lay woste, and the Duke could find no 
other person who would venture to take it. Whereupon, his 
Grace, at whose table I had always the honoiu' to be a welcome 
guest, desired I would use ray endeavours to destroy that 
rogue, and I would oblige him for ever." 

According to this rough dragoon's own account, a fortunate 
concatenation of drinking and dreaming at length directed 
him to the prize. 

" Having dmnk hard one night, I dreamed tliat I had found 
Captain David 8t«el, a notorious rebel, in one of tlie five far- 
mers' houses on a mountain, in the shire of Clydesdale, and 
parish of Lesmahago, within eight miles of Hamilton, a place 
that I was well acquainted with. When I waked out of my 
dream, I presently rose, and ordered thirty-six dragoons to be 
at the place appointed, by break of day. When we arrived 

' ILukslon of Itmhillet, one of Llie miirJerers of Arclibislinp Sliurp. 



I 

I 

i 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



95 



^ 
^ 
^ 



^^^■«ffatT 



iher, I sent a party to each of the five farmer'a houses. 
This villain Steel had murdered above forty of the King's sub- 
jects in cold blood ; and, as I was informed, had often laid 
mares to entrap me. But it happened, tiiat, although he 
usually kept a gang to attend him, yet at this time he had 
none when he stood in the greatest need. One of my party 
found him in one of the farmer's houses, just as I happened 
to dream. The dragoons first searched all the rooms below 
without success, till two of them, hearing somebody stirring 
over their heads, went up a pair of turnpike stairs. Steel had 
put on his clothes while the search was making below. The 
chamber where he lay was called the cJtaviber of dais; which 
is the name given to a room where the laird lies when he 
comes to a tenant's house. Steel suddenly opened the door, 
fired a blunderbuss down at the two dragoons as they were 
coming up the stairs ; but the bullets, grazing against the 
the side of the turnpike only wounded, and did not kill them. 
Then Steel violently threw himself down the stairs among 
them, and made towards the door to save his life, but lost it 
upon the spot ; for the dragoons who guarded the house dis- 
patched him with their broadswords, I was not %oUh the party 
vhen he was killed, being at that time employed in searching 
at one of the other four houses ; but I soon found what hud 
happened, by hearing the noise of the shot ma<lc with the 
blunderbuss. From hence I returned straight to Lanark, and 
immediately sent one of the dragoons express to Greneral 
Drommond at Kdinburgh." 

Deserving as he was of the gallows, Steel died stoutly ; 
and if the question were whether he " had murdered above 
forty of the King's subjects in cold blood," we would not hold 
that fact absolutely proven, merely by the above narrative. 
But as for the manner of Steel's death, and the general charac- 
ter of the culprit, Creichton's most circumstantial and unre- 
•erved account of an exercise of his professional duty, which 
he had imvwdiatdy reported to liead quarters, is not to bo disbe- 
lieved. WodroVs meagre record cannot stand for a moment 
against it. 

But where did the martjTologist obtain his version of the 
«ffatTi' He refers to no authoritv- Noilher have wo been 



96 



UEMORIAI^ OF THE 



able to discover any written " information" on the subject { 
among all his manuscriptB. 

Doubtless, uiKin tliis ocoaeion, Wodrow had helped himself 1 
out of an obscure and now extremely rare print of the year ' 
1690, anonjTDOus, and fathered by uo publisher, which indeed, 
appears to bo tbe prototype of his own grander scheme of 
martyrology. To this veuomous, and utterly unvouched re- | 
cord of fanaticism, we shall have to recur more particularly ■ 
in the sequel. At page 37, of the pamphlet in question, and 
under the head, — " A short hint of those that have been 
murdered since the year 1682," — the 31st item of the account 
runs thus : — 

" Lieutenant Crichton, now prisoner in Edinburgh, did, 
most barbarously, after quarter, shoot David Steel, in the parish 
of Lesmahago, Dt'cember 1686."' Here, manifestly, is Wod- 
row's " information" on tbe subject. He adds, however, that 
Steel lies buried in the church-yard of Lesmahago ; where 
sure enough there is a monument to tbe martyr, with a suit- 
able inscription. Captain Creichton is there of course immor- 
talized as a murderer, since he commanded the party that 
attempted to seize Steel, when the desperate outlaw met lua 
death, blunderbuss in hand. But beyond the usual vitupera- 
tion to be found in all of those fanatical obituaries, the inscrip- 
tion upon Saint Steel's affords no corroboration whatever of 
Wodrow, or of his anonymous authority. It does not say that 
Steel was sliot; and Creichton himself, while mentioning the 
epitaph, appears to have been totally unconscious of any such 
false version existing, as that so oliscurely printed in 1690, 

I Shields h>J not obtainej, nor cired to seek for, the psrtjeulars of Steel's de><h. 
It sufficed for bis purpose to know that he was one of tlic " aufTereni." He took it 
far granted, seeing that ihiH rebel outlaw had been dinpoeeJ ef by the tnilitar)', that 
be was that ; and in recording such mart/rdomB, it una the stereotyped style of 
these mendfiuious fanaticg, to assert mundl}' thai it was *■ aJUr quarttr." Shields 
does Dot say [bul so pots it that the inrerence may be adopted if yeu please) that 
Creichton shot David Steel leiti kit okh hand. That ofiii^er did not even witosM 
the death at the outtan, as be happened (o be leurchiug for him etsewbere at the 
momenL Shields himself tells us thai he only means to aflurd " a short hiut," 
of those who were " murdered ;" a v<-ry convenient form for his brulAl calumnies. 
We shall fiad bis ikorl hint of the martjnloni nf the " Christian Carrier" (to effec- 
Ii*ely elongated by Wodrow and Lord Macaulny), to be prrciwly of the nme eha- 
rai-ler .is this of David Slcel. 



VISCOUNT OP DUNDEE. 



97 



and slavishly repeated by Wodrow in 1721, " Steel," says 
Creichton, " was buried in the church-yard of Lesmahago by 
Bome of his friends ; who, after the Revolulion, erected a fair 
'monument on piUare, over his grave, and caused an epitaph to 
be engraved on the stone, in words to this effect : ' Here lietb 
the body of Captain David Steel, a Saint, who was murdered 
by John Creichton.' Some of my friends burlesqued this 
epitaph in the following manner : — 

' Here lieCh the body of Saint Sled, 
Miinlerei] by John Creichton, that driV" ' 

But it might have been parodied so as to afford a true cha- 
racteristic of all those coarse and crumbling calumnies, upon 
which BO much mistaken sentimentality has been lavished : — 

Here lid tbs body of Saint Steel, 

And h<>re bif tomb-stone lUa at iceil. 

The author of the anonymous print, from which Wodrow 
had borrowed his version of this martjTdom, is none other, as 

le wurda 



, nad iiaperfrrlly of i 
a hunourcil. S« Si 

wing note occur* : — 

was ubliKliiuljr 



lied for 



> wu murJmd by Crmghtan for 
in, and becauM lie dartt mi awn 
wbodied Ilia 20tli of Dec. ^aai. 



■ Crsichlon only narrated from Qieini: 
el th« epitapli willi wliich tbii martyr 
•Lilian of Swift, x. IGl ; whei 

•• Steclr'g epitaph ii atill l< 
by the reverend Ur Hall, minister of tlie pnriel: 

■ Ben Ilea the txidy uf David Steel, morlvr, i 
Ilia tutimony la the covcnanled work of rerii-in 

HUurilj u/tht tlk'n Igrant Jatroyiiiff tif bimi 
I iWiai 1H06, an<l uf bU ago 33. 

David, tt Hliepherd fimt, and iheii 
AdTanced to hv King of nwu, 
Had of hia gmwa in bj* quarter, («*( 
And hero Ihiv wanderer, iioiv a marl 
Who, for hia omiUnuy anil te»\, 
Steele to the back, did pnive true dtt 
Wbo for Cliriiit'a royal trnlha and In 
And of the cu*enaDlcd caiiae, 
Smlbiiid'a famoDH reforniai ■■'■>, 
I>i»imuiDg tyraiila' usurpulifiii, 
By cruel Ci«i|ihlon murdered Ilea, 
Whoae bbod to H«v'n for vangaanr 
" Wbaiever honuur tliia punning dogral may do eiilwr to the memory of the 
BBrlyr.orof Craidilon, the reader aill pnibaUy agree that the poet will bav* 

will be obwrved, tlmt there ia nutliing in th* abova obituary rvconl, to c<ir- 
I roburata Aleaander SbielUa' aaacrtion tliat Dairid Steel wa* ikai. 



98 MEM0RIAI3 OF THE 

we shall presently prove, than his apostolw friend, Alexander 
Shields, the author of " A Hind let loose." And it is in this 
same worthless pamphlet that we discover the earliest record 
of the martyrdom of Saint Brown, the " Christian Carrier." 
But ere we pass on to that now celebrated and classic instance, 
— of the savage nature of Claverhouse, and the cruelty of the 
British Government so happily superseded by the merciful era 
of the massacre of Glencoe, — let us pause upon the record with 
which Wodrow has honoured the greatest of the Grahams. 

Fortunately the history of the Marquis of Montrose, from 
his cradle to his grave, has of late years been so thoroughly 
elucidated, by every species of authentic and contemporary 
document, that all he ever did, or ever said, bearing upon the 
question of his conduct and character, has been made patent 
to the world. No other historical character, indeed, has ever 
been submitted to a more sean^liing ordeal ; and the result, 
incontrovertibly proved, is, that he was a gentle and accom- 
plished nobleman in social life ; a humane General, even in 
the moment of sanguinary victory, and amid the broils and 
bloodshed of a fearful civil war ; a high-minded and disin- 
terested statesman and patriot, even during the chaos of the 
Constitution, and the wreck of public and private integrity. 
The whole of Montrose's career, thus minutely illustrated, 
emphatically gives the lie to the following low and ignorant 
libel, which we find set down, by Wodrow alone, in his 
Analecta, and without the expression of a doubt, in the 
year 1710:— 

" He (Mr Andrew Fullarton) tells me, that in Montrose's 
time, there was one Mr William Smith, minister somewhere in 
Caithness. When Montrose came there with his army for the 
King, he called the ministers in that bounds, and obliged them 
all to take the oath of allegiance to King Charles. They all 
yielded, except Mr Smith. Montrose called him, and threatened 
him. Mr Smith told him, he resolved to live peaceably under 
the King's government, or any government that would pre- 
serv^e liberty and property, but would not take an oath of al- 
legiance. After all fair and /b?^Z means would not prevail,* he 

1 This is characteristic of Wodrow. Most libellers would have been contented 
with saying, " after all fair means would not prevail, he ordered," Ac. 



VISCODKT OF DUNDEE. 99 

ordered him to be bound with a cord about the middle, and 

cauBcd him to be dragged this way after tlie lioat, a mile of Kay 

in the sea ; aud aye when the boatman flow htia exptritig, to 

pail him in, and press him with the oath. He underwent this, 

out and in again. He was brought into a room half dead ; 

and, after ho was recuvcred a little, Montrose told bJTn ho 

I woald yet offer liim his life once ; if not, he would order him 

presently to be killed. He answered, — he was in his hands, 

aod he might do in that as he pleased ; but he was resolved in 

that matter, and would not do it ; hut, since he behoved to 

1 die, he had a message to him from the Lord, which he entreated 

I him to hear and consider : ' You have dragged me,' says he, 

' this day, and made me n gazing-sfock to hundreds, but know, 

eays he, ' tliat witliin nine (or six, / have forgot ) months, you 

I sball be taken and dragged,' snya he, ' as dishonourably as I 

1 am, and a thousand shall gaze on you for every hundred that 

^'lias looked on me, and you shall die in the evil cause yon have 

I hand.' This damped Montrose very much, He left Mr 

Smith in prison, and wont south, and was heat entirely at Old 

I Bam, — if I be not fwgot, — and taken into Edinburgh, and 
execute at Edinburgh,"' 
Here is a true brick of Wodrow's Baliel. Torturing t jTaunj 
fexercised over the Lord's saints : Heroic unflinching martyr- 
dom endured by the elect ; Condign retributive punishment 
Cfvertaking the godless tyrant ; Beatified prophecy issuing out 
of the inspired mouth of the martyr, speedily followed by 
exact and awful fulfilment ! 
But the battle of Old Earn, or Auldearn, was one of Mon- 
troae's greatest victories I Beaten in the south, at Philip- 
haugh, certainly he was, not very long afterwards. But instead 
of buing " taken into Edinburgh and exeeut^^d,' some " nine 
or six months" either after the battle of Aiddeam or the sur- 
prise at Philiphaugh, it was more than five years thereafter 
that Montrose met his fate. So much for covenanting 

\ prophecy, ajid Wodrow's knowledge of the history of the recent 

Ltimcs he was professing to illustrate. We must now dispose 
ySpr ever of this illiterate falstdiood 

i. sea. When writing the Life of UontroH, the ■ntbor had nai 
JImowwJ llii* Binieitnu mlitmnj' of WodrnvN, ar It would tiari bMn rpfal«4 tl>ar«. 




100 MEMORIALS OF THE 

1. When Montrose was, for a brief space, a soldier of the 
Covenant, he greatly displeased the dominant clergy, by his 
humanity contrary to orders. The Reverend Robert Baillie 
repeatedly refers with regret to that contumacious lenity. 
He bitterly complains of Montrose's " too great lenity ;" of his 
not " using some severity for example ;" and he adds, — " the 
discretion of that generous and noble youth was but too great!' 
Commanding for the King, Montrose, in the moment of his 
first desperate victory at the gates of Perth, refused to allow 
the captured cannon to be turned against the masses of the 
flying foe. When he entered the captured city he took instant 
measures to protect the whole community. There is not a 
case on record, of Montrose having put a prisoner to death. 
From Inverlochy, the officers at his mercy, even of the Clan 
Campbell, were dismissed on their parole. With his latest 
breath on tlie scaffold, he anxiously and emphatically repelled 
the vague fanatical cahimny of cruelty, hurled at him because 
of the blood that flowed on the fields of his victories. " Dis- 
orders," he said, ** in an army cannot be prevented; but they 
were no sooner known than punished ; never was any man's 
blood spilt but in battle ; and even then, many thousand lives 
have I preserved!* 

2. At the very time of the useless, impolitic, and horrible 
cruelty, alleged to have been exercised upon the person of this 
covenanting clergyman, every act and movement of the 
dreaded Montrose was closely watched, and minutely chronicled^ 
by the zealots themselves. There is not a hint of such an in- 
cident in any chronicle of the period. Nor in any other page, 
or under any other hand, than Wodrow^'s own. Yet the facts, 
as he records them, are so flagrant, as to render it absolutely 
impossible that all the fanatical chroniclers of the day could 
have missed them, or have failed most clamorously to hold 
them up to public execration. The sufferer is said to have 
tald Montrose, — " you have dragged me this day, and made 
me a gazing-stock to hundreds" ! Was there not one of that 
*■ cloud of witnesses" to report this most public act of indefen- 
sible cruelty, perpetrated upon a clergyman, and one of the 
iQOst heroic of his sect, even to the reverend Robert Baillie, 
the Clarendon of the Covenant, whose pen was in his hand ? 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



101 



Or to llie Argyle Parliament ? Or to the General Assembly 
of tbe Kirk ? 

3. There also exists, in Wodrow's owu handwriting, aud of a 
date jyrior to that of his record of the cruelty in question, a 
minute report which lie liad obtained from one of those cleri- 
cal Kealots who tormented Montrose in prison, with their in- 
vectives and denunciation a, on the eve of his executiim. Thus 
safely in immediate contact with the dreaded hero himself, 
and while loading him with every accusation they could think 
of, these death-ravens of the Covenant never hinted at sucJi a 
crime I 

4. Lauderdale, Montrose's bitterest enemy, and ji>*'me aintser, 
■when categorically questioned, as to the violent but ever 
vague accusation of cruelty, was constrained categorically to 
exonerate Montrose : " Tlie Earl confessed that he did not 
know that he was guilty of any, btit what was done in the 

I >W."t 

6. The period of Montrose's last descent in arms upon 
covenanting Scotland, was about the middle of April 1650. 
On the 9th of April he is discovered dictating orders " from 
shipboard, near the island of Flotta," of that date. A few 
days thereafter he had lauded in Caithness. For the follow- 
ing missive, addressed to " to the gentlemen and heritors of 
the Sheriffdom of Caithness," is dated " Thurso, 1-lth of April 
1650;"— 

" Gentlemen ; Your not appearing to us, after our arrival in 
this place, so timely as we expected, hath necessitated us (the 
conveniency of his Majesty's affairs requiring our removal 
from this part) to leave behind us some certain persons be- 
longing to us, by whom we have thought good t<i commnni- 

; cate unto you such things as wo judge most necessary to he 
done by you at this time, in order to the establisliing and 
carrying on of his Majesty's just service in these parts, and the 
peace and happiness of every one of yourselves. For which 
end we have particularly commanded them to offer unto you, 

L in our name, an oath of fidelity and aUeginnce, to he subscribed 

I by all and every one of you, to his sacred Majesty ; as it hath 



102 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

been already cordiaUy done by those of the gentry and minis- 
ters of Orkney, As we expect your cheerful performance 
hereof, and ready concurrence with us in the prosecution of 
that trust his Majesty has again reposed in us, so we shall 
make it evidently appear imto you, that they could not have 
pitched upon any who should more firmly and constantly pro- 
tect and defend you, in all your just rights and concernments, 
than your very affectionate friend," 

" Montrose."* 

We arc asked to believe that the anxious writer of this 
most temperate, courteous, humane, and dignified manifesto, 
had, at this very time, been exhibiting the most diabolical 
dispositions, before hundreds of spectators, in torturing a 
Caithness-shire clergyman because he refused to take that 
oath of allegiance ; and further, that Montrose himself having 
fallen into the merciless hands of that same clergyman's sect, 
in the month of May immediately foUotving, he was not then 
accused of an act of atrocity, the proclamation of which, 
through the length and breadth of the land, would have been 
of far greater importance to the cause of those railing zealots, 
than the life even of so devoted a brother as the reverend 
William Smith. 

Thus Wodrow has the merit of being the only chronicler, of 
any period, who ever recorded even a hint of this frightful 
accusation. He stands in the very same relation to the hero 
of Killiecrankie. Of Claverhouse, too, he has recorded a foul 
calumny, the most atrocious feature of which is to be met 
with in no history prior to his own, published in the eighteenth 
century, and in none since, until it finds its apotheosis in 
those golden chronicles of England which have so greatly 
amused the nineteenth century. The inquiry then becomes 

> Memoirs of Montroee, Vol. ii. p. 743. The historian of the E^rls of Sntber- 
land, very inimical to Montrose, thus records the simple fact : — *^ James Graham 
eompels the inhabitants of Caithness to subscribe certain new papers, swearing 
•bedience to his Excellency, as to the King's Generalissimo, which he presents also 
to the minisUn there. They do all subscribe these papers exempt one Mr Smith, 
whom, upon his refusal, he sent to his ships, to be put in irons ; but this minister 
was afterwards released." — (P. 552.) An unruly firebrand, doubtless as leniently 
treated as possible under the circumstances. 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. lOS 

utJCBBsary, as to tbe authority uikhi wbich Scotlaml's mnrtyr- 
ologtst had constructed tliat unique legend of the martyrdom 
of John Brown, the " Christiftn Carrier." 

By way of verification, ho as usual refers to " my informa- 
tions," but leaves us to find tliem where we can. With liia 
Damcless and unknown i>rat informations, — if any he had, — 
very old women, perhaps, " who romemhcred the evil days," — 
we cannot grapple. But amid the duaty and dreary maze of 
his manuscripts, wo have succeeded id discovering what, 
manifestly, was his vn-iUcn informations on the suhject, Tho 
document is undated, and unsigned. But it is docqueted, in 
Wodrow'a own hand, " Sufl'miigs of the parish of Miiirkirk." 
Valuable to our martjTologist was the word " sufferings," and 
he worked it well, as did all his zealous correspondents. His 
liberal use of it seemed to settle the question, without the 
necessity of other proof. The information itself, to which we 
now refer, written in another hand, bears this title: "The 
Sufferings of the parishioners of Muirkirk, in the late fimes, 
under the reign of Charles the Second, and of his brother 
King James." The internal evidence proves it to have been 
compiled sometime after the Revolution. In this manuscript 
Claverbouse is only once mentioned, towards the conclusion 
of it, and under this imposing head : " A list of persona in 
this parisli of Muirkirk, drowued, murdered, killed, and sent 
over the seaa, situ:e Ptnthtjui." Tbe accusation again&t our 
hero rana thus: — 

" Also, Claverhouse, in the year 1685, coming out of Les- 
mahago, apprehended John Brown i» Priostshield, at his work, 
his wife standing in the door, and a child in her arms; he 
caused shoot him; and wo are crevlihlij informed that his wife 
said to Clavethouse, ' Yon will give an account of what you 
have done.' Claverhouse answert-d, that, " to men I can be 
answerable, and for God I can tako liiiu in my own hand.'" 
Kot another word about ('laverhousc does this manuscript 
contain. Nor can we discover among the Wodrow collections 
any other " Informations" on (he subject. That it was infor- 
mation obtained by the marlyrologist in aid of his chronicle 
of the '■ SulTi'ring!." of his Kirk, is proveil by his possession 
of it ; find also by this, that ho Adopts the very phrn-ir.ili.gy 



104 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

of his hearsay evidence. In reference to the vulgar bandying 
of words, and blasphemous bravado with which the lofty cava- 
lier is said to have concluded the scene, it will be observed 
that Wodrow, in his history, adopts the words of the manu- 
script, — " I am credibly informed," &c. Now, the revelation 
is startling, and anything but creditable to Wodrow, that he 
was in possession of, using, and foimding his own historical 
credit upon latent written information, which, after that in- 
spection which Wodrow did not anticipate it would be sub- 
mitted to, is found absolutely to contradict the worsf feature 
in the story against Colonel Graham that WodroVs published 
version of it contains. It is not merely that the imscrupulous 
martyrologist had raked out of some other gutter a more trucu- 
lent fact than his written information had happened to supply. 
But it is, that he liad secretly before him a manuscript of 
what he calls ** my informations," and the contents and very 
phraseology of which he adopts, so far as they suit his pur- 
pose, which nevertheless contains a positive contradiction, — 
kept latent by the martyrologist, — of the most telling fact 
against Graham of Claverhouse that is recorded in WodroVs 
own historical version of the death of John Brown ! That 
history tells us, that the " Christian Carrier," " having great 
measure of the gift, as well as the grace, of prayer, the sol- 
diers were affected and astonished ; yea, which is yet more 
singular, such convictions were left in their bosoms, that, as 
my infonnationa bear^ not one of them would shoot him, or 
obey Claverhouse's commands ; so that he was forced to turn 
executioner himself, and, in a fret, shot him with his own hand, 
before his own door, his wife with a young infant standing 
by, and she very near the time of her delivery of another child." 
While recording for history so gross a falsehood (as in the 
sequel we shall prove it to be), derived from what other source 
it were needless to inquire, Wodrow was secretly in possession 
of ^* my informations" of the " Suflferings of the parish of 
Muirkirk," wherein it is expressly stated that Claverhouse 
" caused shoot him;" a mode of expression distinctly imply- 
ing that the execution was in military form, and not by 
the hand of Claverhouse himself. And this most important 
variation in the story Wodrow withholds from history and the 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. 



105 



public, in order that the vile calumny he was anxious to eBta- 
bliah might fall under no doubt or discredit I 

I But we discover another, and a printed record of the death 
of John Brown, — a record also known to Wodrow, and of date 
only five years after tho event. It exists in that rare pamph- 
let compiled by Alexander Shields, from which, as we have 
Elready shown, Wodrow had culled his false version of the 
death of Saint Steel. As formerly promised, we now recur to 
a more particular exposition of this fanatical performance. 
It is entitled, " A short Memorial of the Sufferings and 
Grievances, past and present, of the Presbyterians in Scot- 
land, particularly of those of them called by nickname Came- 
ronians: Printed in the year 1690." That Alexander Shields, 
the author of that infamous production, " A Hind let loose," 
was also the author of this pamphlet, there can be no doubt. 
For Patrick Walker, the fanatical pedlar (a contemporary of 
whom more anon), uses these expressions in his " Life and 
death of Mr Alexander Peden:" — 
■' Let all who desire to be truly informed of the beginning, 

I rise, height, and length, of the tyranny of that twenty-eight 
years' persecution, read the ' Sufferings aud Grievances of 
Presbyterians, especially those of them nicknamed Cameron- 
ians,' written hj /amovs Mr Shirlds." 
But, independently of tho half-crazy pedlar's exulting an- 
nouncement of tlie (act, the authorship can be easily gathered 
from the context. It had originally been framed for presen- 
tation to King William, as a help and directory to the new 
Government, upon the fond but consistent fanatical idea, that 
•the advent of the Orange dj-nasty would prove the inaugnra- 
I tion of a triimiphant Millenium of tlie Covenant in Scotland, 

established upon the religious views aud Christian sentimentB 

of Buch men as " famous Mr Shields." But the Cameronian 

_ clique, to which he had given in liis adhesion, were no less 
I disappointed, as regarded their own positiou in the State with 
r King William, than the Argyle clique had heou with Charles 
I Uie Hccond. No sooner had the death of Dundee, in 1689, 
t steadied tho rocking throne of the Dutchman, (ban these 
I Cameronian wolvc-s came fawning to his footstool. But, when 
' approarhing with a too tiiinnphant lerr, their assuming gri- 



106 MEMORIALS OF THE 

maces and ridiculous anathemas against any govermennt save 
the useless and impracticable directory of the Conventicle, 
were unceremoniously thrust back. A preface to the reader, 
in Saint Shields' " Short Memorial," contains this long groan 
over the ignominious discomfiture : — 

" Now, for adhering to this complex testimony, what have 
been the sufferings and grievances of Presbyterians in gene- 
ral, and ours in particular, since anno 1660, from the popish, 
prelatic, and malignant party, is more fully demonstrated, 
with the principles and testimony contended for by us vindi- 
cated, in Naphtoli, Jus Populi, the Hind let loosCy our In/or- 
matory Vindication ^ and the Testimony against the Toleration 
given in by that faithful and zealous minister of Christ, Mr 
James Ren wick, and here summarily remonstrated. We had 
once a resolution,- at the first appearance of the Prince of 
Orange, who, under God, was the honoured instrument of our 
begun enlargement from them, to have addressed his High- 
ness with this same memorial. But that failing, after this 
long suspense in expectation of some redress of grievances, — 
whereof we and many others have l)ecn in a great measure 
disappointed, — we have been induced to publish it in this 
jtmcture, with an appendix of our present complaints of some- 
thing that we understand to be wrong in the Church, State, 
Army, and Country, at the time of the writing thereof ; which 
was in the time and upon occasion of the many adjournments 
of Parliament ; wherein something will occur which may seem 
obliquely to reflect upon the Gk)vernment, when we complain 
of the ill administration of many malignants in power. But 
as they are sad truths which cannot be denied, and though we 
may be charged with imprudence in speaking so freely what 
many thousands, and those of the surest friends the Govern- 
ment hath, do think, so, however we be neither politicians 
nor flatterers, we think conscience and loyalty both doth 
oblige us to speak what concerns the King and Country both 
to hear," &c. &c. 

But neither the Court, the Elirk, nor the Parliament, of 
Presbyterian King William, would have anything whatever 
to do with the " conscience and loyalty," of the sect whom 
Saint Shields was now leading ; nor would they condescend 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 



107 



lio pRtronize, or venture to list«ii to, " the surest friends the 
pGovemmcut hath." This Dutch ingratitude, and Orange ob- 
stinacy, roused at least the indignation of that godly pedlar, 
Patrick Walker, Referring to King William's General 
Assembly, convened in October 1690, he bitterly complains of 
" The hard and bad treatment Master Shields, Linning, and 
I.Boyd met with ; their paper containing the Grievances only 
iTead in a Committee ; not one speaking in favours of it, — 
I.«xcept an old minister from the north, who said, ' That is a 
I jell sort of a paper ; it deals the btxtte among the haima, and 
Igives me a cuff in the by-going,' — and condemned in open 
T Assembly, though few of them knew what was in it. Old Sir 
|, James Stewart, Advocate, said several times, this was a stain 
I to that Assembly ; And let the unbiassed world judge, if that 
I paper deserved these epithets they gave it, inserted in their 
1,-public Acts, viz., that it contains several peremptor gross mis- 
f takes, unseasonable and impracticable proposals, viKharitable 
I uid i^juriwie reflections." 

Patrick the i)edlar must have had strange notions of " the 
I unbiassed world," to suppose that it could do any thing else 
I than coincide with an Assembly of the Kirk in condemning 
I this alarming and untoward resurrection of their own revola- 
f.tionary principles. Nor can it well be doubted, that when the 
I Tenom foimd a safer vent, for all concerned, in the shape of a 
I pamphlet anonyviouxly printed, that production would be yet 
I more redolent of fanatical trash, treason, and calumny. As it 
I contains the earliest record we can discover of the death of 
1 the " Christian Carrier," and really seems to be the fountain 
at which the Shields-inspired Wodrow drank of the Suffer- 
ings and Grievances of his Kirk, wo must pause a little upon 
the long forgollon record. 

It commences with an address to the reader of several pages 
of zealot bombast, assuming to be a " deduction" of " Keligious 
and Civil Liberties." But all intention is disavowed of oppos- 

Iing King William, whom it bespatters with praise, laying the 
entire blame upon " Ma3itpuint« ut Court, Council, and Parlia- 
ment, who aro seeking to betray him and vs Imth." This ad- 
vanced guard, of his array of mart)Ts, is followed by the main 
body of " Grievances," — tbirty-tbreo in numiier, systemnlinilly 



108 MEMORIALS OF THE 

martialled. The curious in that interminable subject " Scot- 
tish Grievances," would do well to hunt out this very rare 
specimen of them, and study the subject under the light of 
such a genius as " famous Master Shields." After the 
" Grievances," march a rear guard of " SuflFerings," showing 
somewhat like FalstaflTs recruits, — " ragged old-faced ancients; 
nay, and the villains march wide betwixt the legs as if they 
had gyves on ; there's but a shirt and a half irr all their com- 
pany." There is not the slightest attempt to authenticate this 
libellous section of the performance. The naked assertion by 
the anonymous pamphleteer, of the most violent accusations 
against men of the highest position, must be accepted of, as 
the fact. If we are to believe this record, among all the rebels 
of the west of Scotland, from before the murder of Archbishop 
Sharp until after the death of Dimdec, there was not one 
single criminal. On the other hand, every member of the royal 
family, every statesman, every nobleman, every military com- 
mander, every laird in any degree connected ^vith upholding 
the uncovenanting throne in Scotland, against a lurking rebel- 
lion of armed assassins, were men without piety or principle ; 
without a spark of Christian feeling or natural humanity in 
their bosoms ; and daily occupied, as a pleasant pastime, with 
slaughtering some harmless and saintly peasant, at his cottage 
door, or by the wayside, or (according to Malcolm Laing and 
Charles Fox) " in the arms of his wife." No single fine was 
ever exacted that comes not under Saint Shields' category of 
cruel extortion. No tax to sustain the executive was ever 
imposed, that does not enter his black list of lawless oppres- 
sion. No rehel^ however rampant, was ever deprived of his 
life, in battle, or imder martial law, or by judicial sentence, 
that was not murdered, — that had not lived a saint and died 
a martyr. What a picture of Scotland ! During the latter 
half of the seventeenth century, all the lowest in the land re- 
presented Heaven, all the most noble and exalted represented 
Hell ! How came this to be ? Let us learn from famous 
Master Shields, who inspired a Wodrow, who instructed a 
Macaulay. 

" Tlie immediate authors, actors, and instruments, of these 
oppressions, were principally the Curates, instigating the 



VIriCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



loy 



^^ itoci 



ivy Council, which empowered the/orces, aud noblemen and 
:ffentlemen of the country, to prey upon the poor people. All 
'Canuot be here expressed ; but some of the moat noted in the 
iireBtern shires shall he named, who were the greatest persecu- 
tora and oppressors, by finings, and other exactions." 

And first this recording angel names " Officers of the 

lyorces," commencing with the prime minister's brother : 

" Colonel Douglas, now Lieutenant-General Douglas, brother 

to the Duke of Queensberry : Lieutenant-General Drummond : 

Earl of Lithgow ; Earl of Airlie : Lord Balcarrcs ; Graham of 

ClaverhouBe, afterwards Viscount of Dundee: Colonel Bucban :" 

uid eo on through all ranks of the infernal host, Majors, Cap- 

^taine, and Lieutenants, till we come to, — " Bonahaw, a bor- 

irer, a hitjkwayttian, afterwards an officer of dragoons, robbed 

inch from poor people in Clydesdale i Duncan Grant, a cripple 

mnth a tree leg, a vcrj' outrageous persecutor, exacted in Clydes- 

le, from poor people, above fifteen hundred pounds"! 

Next in this Pandomonean panorama arc paraded the noble- 

iaien and gentlemen, great statesmen and infiuential lauded 

prietors. Hide your heads Christian descendants of the 

Upholders of Antichrist. They are catalogued under their 

respective shires, — nailed to the locality of their iniquities like 

kites and beasts of prey on a bam door. Clydesdale, Ren- 

&ew, Ayrshire, Galloway, Nithsdale, Annandale I How a 

lOhristian gentleman, or a righteous judge, should ever have 

fhed us, as wo know thoy have, from the loins of such a 

Itock, is matter of marvel. In AjTshire, — " Crawford of Ard- 

miUan, a wicked persecutor and spoiler; the laird of Craigie, a 

ffreat persecutor and oppressor." In Nithsdale, — " The Duke 

-of Queensberry and his sons oppressed much: John Alison, 

iberlain to the Duke of Queensberry, when dying said, ho 

damned his soul for the Duke his master." Twero long 

tell all the tyrannical iniquities of the great heritors enume- 

Xed under this head ; nor can we enter hero into the savage 

which the author curtly and nakedly catalogues, under 

following sanguinary rubric, — 

The list of those who were killed in cold blood, without 
lal, conviction, or any colour of law, hy the persons under- 



110 MEMORIALS OF THE 

written ; a short hint of those that have been murdered since 
the year 1682 wiU mffee" (suffice ?) 

And this is the vial of wrath, out of which the giant Wod- 
row issues, in vaporous and vapouring expansion, monatrum 
horrendum ingena ! He had possessed himself of a great deal 
of the calumnious rubbish which formed the staple of the older 
martyrologist's anathemas ; and his own " History of the 
Sufferings of the Church of Scotland," exhibits throughout 
the impress of his fanatical master. And in this anonymous 
print of 1690 it is, that the earliest record occurs (so far as 
discovered), of the death of John Brown. But Alexander 
Shields does not therein dignify Colonel Graham of Claver- 
house according to the figurative denimciations of Lord 
Macaulay, as " chief of this Tophet on earth.'i He sets down 
against him, indeed, every necessary exercise of the executive 
power entrusted to him, as a murder or a savage act. But he 
tells us, " The chief contrivers and authors of all these 
slaughters and mischiefs, were they that enacted and sub- 
scribed the edicts for them in Council ; principally the Earl 
of Perth, Chancellor : Duke of Queensberry : Marquis of 
Athole ; and particularly the Viscount of Tarbat, who invented 
the murderous device, wherein yet he carried so cimningly 
that he procured the despatch of the act to the King with 
such suddenness, that he found a way to shift his own sub- 
scribing it." The terrible guardsman, however, is not left 
unscathed by this famous chronicler. Among less conspicuous 
instances of his professional activity, the following is recorded : 
" Item^ the said Claverhouse, in May 1685, apprehended John 
Brown in Priesthill, in the parish of Muirkirk, in the shire of 
Ayr, being at his work, about his own house, and shot him 
dead before his own door, in presence of his wife." 

Thus curtly, and just five years after the event, is the death 
of the " Christian Carrier" recorded against Claverhouse, by 
the most unscrupulous pen that was ever dipt in brimstone, 
— a pen that, as the fanatic pedlar so dolefully admits, was 
scorned and rejected by the Presbyterian Grovemment of King 
William, and fonnally condemned by the Assembly of the 
Kirk " for its gross mistakes, unseasonable and impracticable 



V[SCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



Ill 



wsals, uncharitable and injurious reflections."' Had there 
xiHt«d, at that time, such a slory, however false, as that 
folonel Graham had shot ^-ith his own hand an innocent 
lant, hecause the dragoons under hia command had refused 
obey the cruel order, that version would have l»en no less 
raluable, for the object of Alexander Shields, tlian it was to 
iie design of Wodrow's martyrologies, and would have been 
jcorded con amore in the venemous pamphlet of 1690. But, 
8 we ascend to the source, tlie hideous legend of Saint Brown 
Momes " fine by degrees, and beautifully less." Nay, when 
wenty-four years thereafter the concentrated essence of fana- 
!cal and reckless calumny was raked together into that fecu- 
ot heap, the Scotch Newgate Calendar of Saints, entitled, 
" A C'loiid of Witnesses for the royal prerogative of Jesus 
jist," the testimony of this delinquent, John Brown, waa 
[aiu presented to the public, but simply in the form of a 
trbatim reprint of what had Wen recorded on the subject by 
ijllexander Shields in 1G90.' 

B Report from Ibe ComroitWe of Oterturos lo the Gcncnl Aiaemblj, con- 
I t^io; the wnleuce cjiinled by Walker in ha Life of Pedra, kdds tliese words, 
which the pcdlir had omitled, — ** Tending rellwr to kindle conleution, llun to 
eompDH diviaionB." Seo oeil Hole. 

• Tlie Retarend Aieiuinder SliicljB, author of " A Hind let loniw,'' i>su in fact 
one of llic most oulni^i-uua, mid at (he ume time oawardly, finshnada of [lie age. 
Hbd; were the poor deliuquenta whose ignorant minds he inHaiiied, a»d drove on 
to their deetruetiou. Vet so little was he himeelf inclinsd lo ilford in hi« own per- 
•00 the " leMiinony" of a niartyr, that he never fjuied to succumb and cranoh to 
p'AUhoHl; when arraigned for his olfencos. We lutve teen (p. 61.) how to save his 
b he took the oath of allegiance, and solemnly abjured the truculent treasons of 
it the time when so mercifully dealt witli in being only sont ■ priiuner lo 
But tlio Kirk Government of King William, which might have been 
Bipecled to bo grateful lo the firebrands that lighted the advent of the Orange 
dynaily, regarded Alexander Shields, and his coadjutors, as dangemus lo all esta- 
blished gavemment, and treated tliem after a fashion whieb entirely jualified the 
fallen dynasty in having placed their leader in limbo. Nor is Ifast true which 
Wodmw records, thut this fanatic '■ came in htartUn at the ReTolutian."-~(Se« 
iMfore, p. 61.) The vpry reverse ie the truth. The follawiog is from the oldest 
printed volume of Ihe Acts of the General Assembly of the Churcli of Scotland, 
pabliabed in IG91 :~ 

" Edinbnrgh, 3£lh October 1690.— Tlie General Assembly having received a 
Report from tlie Committee of Overtures, anent rwo payrrt given into the said 
Committee, and subscribed by Mr Tlioiua* Lining, Mr Alexander Scbields, and Mr 
William Boyd,— who had followeil umo coiirBV mnlrarf to tU ori*n o/liU Ck%nk, 
— whMTeby, ' The said Committee, out of their ardent dmirv of union In the Church, 



112 MEMORIAI^ OF TUE 

Having thus traced the genealogy of Lord Macaulay'a ■ 
rivative calumny against Dundee, we must now discIoBe, from 
more authentic sources, the actual circumstances under which i 
this John Brown forfeited his life to the laws of his country. 

The idPane but alarming attempt, by a wild faction of the I 
community of Scotland, chieHy inspirc'd by those Tillajious I 
Bpirite who had just escaped from the scene of their enormity, I 
— murdering an aged prelate literally in the arms of hia 
daughter, — the audacious scheme of such characters to de- 
throne Charles the Second, was finally crushed, as an open i 
rebellion in arms at Bothwell Bridge, But the fanatical dis- 
tricts of the west of Scotland, among whose all but inacces- 
sible moors and mosses armed conventicles were more active , 

Koomaiend to the Anemblr the reading of tjU ikartsr of iXeu tm paprn, in whidi 
the fore-named persona oblige themnelTea, after the exhibiting of the lar^ ff^i 
(which they offer, as they profoan, far the ftoHerattun of tiitir tORKitiieri,} Mid 
laying it down at tlie Assembly's feet, to be disposed apon as the Aucmblv should 
think lit : Tliat thev shall in all required enbrnisMon subject themsclvea, their live* 
and doctrine, t^j the cognizance of the respectire Juilicatonea of this Ctinrch, 
and equally to oppose schism and ileftction in any capacity that they slranld be 
capitbte of. But tlio said Committee judgeth the reading of 0<e larger af At taUi 
(wo papen iu full Asiembly to be \neonKn\nt, in reheard, though there be uttral 
good thing* in it, yet the sune doth also euntain utxral pirrmptorj aitd jrom mn- 
tattt, tuiieatatiabU ami impraetieaUe propotalt,aad unaluiritabUatid injuriottra- ' 
fitetioia, Itnd'iitf rathtr U kimllt sontrelioM ttaa lo iompMe diHtienn NoTerlhateai, 
the said Committee give it as their opinion, that the foresaid o^fcr of the above 
named persono, llieir tulijection and obrditnet lo the authority of this Chorch, in 
her respective Judicatories, contained in tliu aaid tkarUr paper, should be eiitei^ 
(ained and seccpled of by the Assembly, and the/ received into conimuaion with 
this Cliurch, according to their several capnoities.'" 

" Likeas the above-named persona having compeared In prcscDce of the Assem- 
bly, and judicially owned and adhered nnto tlieir eaid ihorttr ]iaptr; and the Assem- 
bly having hoard the above written Report of the Committee of Overtores, regnrd- 
ing both the said inpcis, as also tlie said iktrter paper read in tlieir preseuce, tlie 
Cienentl Assemhly, after mature deliberation, did HanniHiuiiify, and wicAmt a aim- 
trari/ roice, approve the above written report and opinion of the Committee of 
Overtures, in the whole heads thereof. Which being intimated lo the fore-named 
persona, they aeifuiaetd Iherela. Upon all which the following act was made." 

Then fallows tlie act of subjection of these backaiiding saints, whom the now 
Bomowhat sobered, and tolerably saliafled. Assembly of tlie Kirk," gravely admo- 
nished by the Modoralor to walk orderly in time coming, in opposition tn all schism 
and division," in terms of (heir " submission and Bubjeetion." 

So much for Wodrow's " sucaeaaful, serious, and solid preacher, and useful mi- 
aister in Ihia Cliurch, moved with love lo souls, and aomewbat of the uid apoitelie 
i/iirK."— (See before, p, 62.) 



I 



VISCOUNT OF liUXDEE. 113 

than ever, harboured various wandering bands of the muet 
truculent of these rebels. Having fled from justice, they 
were for the most part under senttnce of fugitation ; and 
therefore ready and anxioua to combine into a new army 
against the reigning dj'nastj whenever tho opportunity oc- 
curred. Meanwhile, tho most desperate of these lurking cri- 
minals, — being the very flower of Wodrow's army of martyrs, 
— were ever on the alert to indulge their vengeful feelings, by 
murdering any of the loyal lieges whom their conventicle 
orators, or their own private eiunitiea, might point out for 
- destruction. The state of matters in the west of Scotland at 
that time, was worse than the worst condition of Ireland, in- 
fested by assassins, under the domination of unprincipled 
priests. The peace and security of the country was utterly 
destroyed, and the Groverament kept in a constant state of 
agitation and alarm, by their treasonable proclamations to 
excite the people, and their repeated acts of insane violence 
to terrify tho peaceable and loyal. No government on earth 
could tolerate such a system, and exist. Acts of executive 
Beverity were not tho cai/se of this fanatical fury, but the 
effect.^ Unlesfi these fanatics were put down at once by the 
moet energetic and rapid exercise of the executive power, it 
was manifest that anarchy must desolate the land. 

The most alarming crisis was towards the close of 1684, 
and throughout the year 1685, in which last the " Christian 
Currier" at length paid the penalty of hia folly and his crimes. 
The Duke of Queensberry, holding the offices of Lord High 
Treasurer and Lord High Commissioner to the Parliament, 
was now prime minister for Scotland. He was in constant 
correspondence with the Conrt ; and every incident of public 
importance was reported by him to tho Duke of York, whom 
the King bad entrusted with the command of the affairs of 
Bcotland, civil and military. The office was 



■ Laodlr u \jitA M«»uUf tirliim* agftinil *h>t h* uMimn bi h»Tr> hrrii iln 
•Mcnble emeltj' ot the (rinrarnmpDt of Chart** tuA itmf, ho ■oim'tiin'-K flndi ■ 
■naienient to ngtrd cnHlly aa tha eiciuabiB conConiiUlit of in rrregriie gvilipv 
Henwntioiu Iww •• lli*t Brurl \iM mott eumtilttt a»d eKtrg^ic intlim l.j- wliifli (i(rpn 
propoMi] la make Inkiid thoroagh Engliib, wu tbmduncd," after the l!Mir]iiitlti(i 

Hilt. 1. 167. 



114 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



to that nnfortunate Prince, and one of extreme difficulty. 
We may here afford, from the Queenslierry papers, already re- 
ferred to, a few Bpecimens of this anxious correspondence, 
which has never hitherto entered history, or appeared in 
print.' 

Upon the 20th of November 1684, his KoyaJ Highness writ«s 
to Qtieenaberry on the subject of the fugitated rebels' decla- 
ration of war, and threats of murder, which bad just been 
reported to him : — 

" I see by yours of the 9(h that another declaration has 
been put up by some of the rebels, upon some churcb-doora, 
one of which has been sent me by the Chancellor. 'Tis well 
they can do nothing else but Ifiat, and rob poor mtnieters' 
fiowses. One Roswell, a Presbyterian minister, was this day at 
the King's Bench found guilty of treason by the petty Jury, 
for preaching seditiously at one of their meetings." 

The Ixird Register, Sir George Mackenzie of Tarbal (soon 
afterwards created Viscotiiit Tarbat), thus reports to Queena- 
berry, then in Dumfriesshire, by letter dated 10th November 
1684 :— 

" This day the Secret Committee have met on occasion of 
a paper affixt on the cross of Litbgow, declaring war with 
the Government, and promising to kill ua all. 

" Since we find there is a party declaring a war, who lurk 
within us, wc think on a strict enquiry, for all in the nation 
who will not /aiswear those opinions; and especially in Edin- 
burgh ; and at any rate to free the kingdom of all of them. 
For (hunting ?) and hawking are judged absolutely insecure. 
The justice court are just now denouncing Earl Loudon, Mel- 
ville, Ac. fugitives. We aro ordering an enquiry on oath in 
Linlithgow and Borrowstounness concerning this paper." 

The protective measure adopted by the Privy Council of 
Scotland, after consulting the Judges, was, the application of 
a special test, to which all were to he liable, of an oath, ab- 
juring the having been accessory to, or approving of, those 
treasonable and sanguinary proclamations, secretly afhxed to 
the ofittrcA doors and market-crosses; threats which these fugi- 
tated rebels immediately commenced to fulfil. Further, it 



J 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 115 

was detennined that the fact of obstinately refusing, in pre- 
sence of two witnesaes, to take that easy and rational test of 
innocence and peaceful intentionB, should subject the guilty , 
party to the penalty of death, under martial law, whenever 
apprehended by the military authorities sent in pursuit of 
Buch lawless and dangerous fugitives. 

Upon the 27th of November 1684, the Duke of York again 
writes to Queensberrj as follows, on the subject of the mid- 
night murder of tho two Lifeguardsmen : — 

" By the letters which came from Edinburgh of the 20th 
•nd 2'2d, yesterday I was informed of the murder was com- 
mitted by some of the fugitive rebels upon two of the gentle- 
men of the guard, near Blackburn, in pursuance of their late 
declaration. It shows of what abominablo principles they are, 
and what all loyal men are to expect from them. For now 
that they are not in a condition of doing the Government any 
harm, they will vent their malico upon private persons. So 
that all you, who have so great a share of the affairs there, 
ought more particularly to have a care of yourselves. You 
will see by his Majesty's letter, which is to go by this post, 
that he approves of the method proposed for the finding 
and punishing such desperate vilUins. I have not time to 
say more." 

It was upon the 12th of December thereafter, less than a 
month, that the intrepid and conscientious curate of Garft- 
phaim was shot at midnight within his own manse. That 
base deed being also immediately reported to his Majesty and 
the Duke of York, the latter again writes as IbUows, from St 
James's, to the prime minister in Scotland, upon the 22d of 
December 1684 :— 

" I have last week yours of the 13th, but not in time to 
answer it by the last Saturday post ; by which I find that 
Bome of the fugitive rebels had murdered a minister in Gal- 
loway ; by which one sees that those desperate villains will 
lose no opportunity of doing what mischief they can ; and 
would spare nobody, and do more were it in their power ; and 
I am sure you of the Secret Committee will continue their 
care and vigilance to secure the Qovemment from such bloody 
principled villains." 



116 KEMORIALS OF THE 

Immediately thereafter, in January 1685, as we hare al- 
ready Been, the gallant Captain Urquhart, a staflF-oflBcer, the 
laird of Meldnim's brother, fell by the hand of an outlawed 
rebel ; and Colonel Douglas, the prime minister s brother, nar- 
rowly escaped the same fate. 

Nor was this all. At this time, for his Majesty's troops to 
traverse the disaflFected districts, although imder the highest 
command, and the strictest discipline, was a duty of the 
greatest peril, more esi)ecially if they happened to have rebels 
in custody. The dragoons were shot from ambuscades ; and 
even when their prisoners had been lodged in some place of 
security, the rebels would force the doors to release them, 
whereby some of these insane outlaws, in eflFecting their cri- 
minal ends, obtained their crown of martyrdom on the spot. 
We again quote from the too friendly Fountainhall, but a 
Christian gentleman, who never attempted to palliate these 
villanies ; and who, to his immortal honour be it remembered, 
declined, from his own party, in 1692; the office of Lord Ad- 
vocate, because he could not justify the Orange Government 
in regard to the massacre of Glencoe. 

" In August 1684, some of Claverhouse s troop, bringing 
sixteen prisoners from Dumfries, they were assaulted by some 
Whigs at a strait pass of Enterkin hill, and two or three of 
the King's forces were killed." 

" 20tli December 1684 : Letters came from Colonel Graham 
of Claverhouse, then in Galloway, that he had met with a 
party of these rogues, who had skulked in the mountains (if 
their retiring holes could be got, they are so cowardly they 
may be easily routed,) he had followed them, killed five, and 
taken three prisoners, some of which were of the murderers 
of the minister of Carsphairn ; and that he was to judge and 
execute the three prisoners by his justiciary power ; and if his 
garrisons were once placed, he hoped to secure and quiet the 
country." 

This fearful state of affairs is confirmed, and more instances 
afforded, by another chronicler, nearly contemporary, who 
published in 1714 a short memoir of Dundee, designing him- 
self " an officer in the army." There is no reason to doubt 
the facts he so circumstantially records, and in several of 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDKE. 117 

which he is corroborated by Fountainball, and others. Refer- 
ring to the year 1685, be says, — 

" About this time the Whigs began to renew their rebel- 
lions in Gialloway, where they murdered the minister of Ore- 
font} in his bed ; and coming afterwards to Kirkcudbright, 
killed a poor man there, who was one of the sentries on the 
tolbooth, only for challenging Wlio comes there? About six 
miles from Kircudbright, Clavers, with some horse and dra- 
goons, attacked that party of rebels that murdered the minister, 
chased tliem iuto a bog, killed seven or eight of them,* and took 
some prisoners, who told him the murderer of the minister lay 
dead on the spot. 

" This is all I can observe transacted between Clavers and 
the rebels in King Charles II.'s time, except some barbarous 
murders committed by the rebels on Clavers' soldiers, whereof 
there are now living many eye-witnesses, both in England 
and Scotland. 

" William Cunningham and Andrew Cleveland, two dra- 
goons, going out of Cumlock in the ahire of Ayr, were set 
upon by seven country fellows out of a wood ; Cunningham ■ 
waa murdered, and at the intercession of some countrywomen, 
Cleveland was saved, 

" Oliphant and his comrade, two dragoons quartered in the 
parish of Newmills, in the shire of Ayr, wore both murdered 
by the Wliigs on a Sunday morning as they went to their 
conventicle: a glorious work before prayers 1 

" Irvine, a dragoon, was killed between Douglas and Lanark, 
by a man and a woman who went along the road with him, 
until they came to a pass ; the man threw him olT bis horse, 
and the woman killed bim with his own sword. 

" Flesher, a trooper coming homo to bis troop in Clydes- 
dale, was murdered by six Whigs, thrown in a river, and 
found six weeka afterwards. 

" Two troopers, who went out of the garrison of Blabau, in 



■ ■ CraToni" U obvinualy « iiiiii)irlni 
M, «M ninnlervd st mi'luiglii, but 



tor Canphnirn. Tlw nibiiilar, w we Iwra 
on JiU own thnmholil, hkvUu b«cn rouHj 



MEMORIALS OF TBE 




the shire of Ayr, iu the evening to walk, were both shot from 
the wood by tho Whigs. 

" A single dragoon coming into a pubhc-house to ask the 
way to Blahan, a woman spinning on her distaff told him she 
would show him ; and instead thereof, she immediately called 
six or seven men, and murdored the dragoon, 

" At Entricken hill, some whigs, hid in hushes, shot two of 
a party of Dundee's horse, as they passed that way.' 

" At Swine Abbey, in Linlithgowshire, James Carmichael, 
laird of little Blackburn, with a party of about fifty whigs, 
murdered Captain Duncan Stewart, and Captain Kennoway, 
both gentlemen of the King's horse-guarda," &cJ 

" At Bella-path near Cumnock, in the shire of Ayr, the 
whigs took one Houston a prisoner from a small party of 
horse, commanded by Mr James Affleck, and killed three of 
his party. 

" And to foment our rebellions in Scotland, much about the 
time these murders were committed, Argjle sailed from Ulye 
in Holland, on the 2d of May 1G85,' with three ships, one of 
thirty, one of twelve, and one of six guns, and twenty 
boats."* 



It was while murder thus stalked the land ; while no loyal 
person's life was safe from these skulking outlaws, and con- 
venticle fire-brands — delicately called, " Wanderers,' " Society 
People," and " the Suffering Bemnant ;" while state prisoners 
were being continually rescued from the custodyof the King's 
troops, and generally with the sacrifice of the lives of some of 
those greatly provoked, and grossly maligned soldiers ; all 
this, too, at the very time when the descent upon the west of 
Scotland, at the head of a rebel army, by that hereditary rebel 
Argyle was momentarily expected, that a most harassing, 

' Tbe ume alTur is more partieulnrr^ reoorded hy FouDtiiiiliall. 
' Tbe DoloHoDS murder recsrdud by FounUlnlull *1irl others. Th« ibove 
clironicler imputes llie murder to Ihe kndlord Carniicluiel, Khom he ■ccuKs of 



■ Ttie dny oftor the inlUtsrT i 

> Memoin of Ehc Lord Vise 

Lnndon : printed Tor Jonas Bn 



itianorjahti Brown. 

. Dundee, it, bj in OBkcr nf the Army, 

at Iha BliEk Swao, 1714. Reprinled in llie 



J 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. 119 

dnngerous, undigaitied, but indispensable duty, was imposed 
U[)on the two moat difitinguisbod officers in Scotland, Ci^Ionel 
Graham of Claverhouse, and Colonel Douglas, brother to the 
Duke of Queensberry , immediately before they were botii raised 
to the rank of Bngndierti, upon the liiiidiug of Argyle. Holding 
distinct and co-equal comniandB, they hud been commissioned, 
in the first instance, to scour the disafTected diatricts with 
their dragoons — Beelzebub and ApoUyon, as Lord Mncaulay 
has antichristened them — to track these d/iiigerous outlaws 
to their aeveral caves and fastnesses, in order to apprehend 
them, or at least to prevent their combination in arms. They 
were also particularly instructed to scatter the armed field con- 
venticles, justly characterised as being " to the scandal of re- 
ligion, and contempt of the Govorument," and which were the 
most pyoUBu nurseries for Argyle's rebellion ; to seize kU rebel- 
lious persons ; to fulfil the latest orders of the Privy Council, 
by putting the oath of abjuration (applicable to the must re- 
cently issued rebolhous proclamations and incentives to 
murder) ; and, in the event of such iiersons refusing, in the 
presence of witness, so to absolve themselves from being par- 
ties to these treasonable and sanguinary mauifestus, anony- 
mously affixed to the church-doors and market-crosses through- 
out the country, to execute them on the spot iu military 
form. 

These terrible duties were imposed, imperatively, upon 
Colonels Douglas and Graham in particiUar. Hence the pro- 
minence of their names, an<l the great abuse bestowed upon 
them, in fanatical histories. Their instructions were publicly 
announced, and strictly defiued. Nor can we diitcover, save 
in the mendacious and calumnious chronicler uf the Wodrow 
school, a single instance, iu which either of these high-minded 
and distinguished couunaudcr», cxci^cded their orders, acted 
Hjion the impulse of mere personal feeling, or passion, or took 
the law iuto their own hands. Indeed, as reganl« Colonel 
Graham of Clavcrhouso, we say, dospight all the trash tliat has 
been written against bim, that the rare combination of rpiali- 
ticK most ni-cessary for such a service. — onergetic action, clear 
and discriminating views of public policy and private rights, 
the firm purpose nf nn inrlomitable spiril, mni tb'' 



120 HEMOBIAI^ OF THB 



8 of a cultivated mind, — were eminently to be found in 
him. Ho was well tried, under most difficult circumstaiiceB, 
in all these requisitea, and never found wanting. The maligned 
GoTcrmnent under which he acted, had good reason to know, 
that the desire to avoid unnecessary bloodshed, were among 
the high attributes of their greatest Captain. The recent 
discovery, among the Queensberry Papers, of thirty-Beven 
letters in the handwriting of " that mau rapacious and pro- 
fape, of violent temper, seared conscience, and adamantine 
heart," addressed to the prime minister for Scotland, will of 
themselves suffice to prove, in the course of these Memorials, 
that he never acted either as a statesman, a military comioan- 
der, or a man, except upon the highest principle of duty. Ik 
will be seen, that, in every exercise of the executive power 
entrusted to him, he failed not to report the most minute cir- 
cumstancee, both to the General commanding in chief, and to 
the head of the Government, that it might be known he did 
his duty, his whole duty, and notliing but his duty. 

Accordingly, he reports as usual to head-quarters, the then 
comparatively unimportant circumstance of the military exe- 
cution of John Brown. But ere wo lay before our readers the 
recently discovered record, under his own band, of that tragic 
incident, we must premise, from the same authentic sources, 
some illustrations to justify the character which we have 
given above of " Bloody Clavers." 

5. Real chamcteriatics of Claverhouse. True story of the 
death of John Brown. 

We have it on the authority of Lord Macaulay (instructed 
by Wodrow, the value of whose records has now been suffi- 
ciently tested), that for such deeds as the murder of Archbishop 
Sharp, and of the clergyman of Carsphaim, Graham of Claver- 
house was responsible, because he had " goaded the peasantry 
of the Western Lowlands into madness," He has told ub, 
that, " pre-eminent among the bands which oppressed and 
wasted these unhappy districts, were the dragoons commanded 
by James Graham of Claverhouse." They were not, indeed, 
the ordinary dragoons of military history, and human warfare. 



I 

I 

J 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 



121 



tut devils incarnate. " These wicked men," be says, " used 
in their revels to play at the torments of Hell, and to call each 
other by the name of devils and damned souls." But " the 
chief of this Topbet on earth" excelled them in wickedneas 
OS Satan his myrmidons. Discipline, of course, was out of 
the queetioQ. The devils only obeyed their chief, when his 
orders happened to chime in with their own diabolical fancies. 
Sometimes, indeed, he would give the sign, and, " in three 
minutes the goodman of the house was wallowing in a pool of 

I blood at his own door." For, " Dundee had bound himself to 

I do the work of Hell on earth." But there were times when 

1 those wild and bard-hearted men, who nicknamed one 

another Beelzebub and Apollyon, shrank from the great 

wickedness of butchering ;" as in the case of John Brown, 

whom Satan slew with his own hand, dissentient, diabolis. 

Graham of Claverhouso commanded soldiers of the highest 
class. But, along with their illustrious chief, they were tied 
to a service the most harassing and trying to which the 
temper and the spirit of brave soldiers were ever doomed to 
submit. Hence the first duty of their leader was to preserve 
the strictest discipline ; and to inculcate the necessity of the 
otmost forbearauce towards the peaceful peasant, and Jualice 
to the poor man. And all this Claverhouse never failed to do. 
A few months before the murder of Archbishop Sharp, we 
find him with his dragoons at Dumfries. Is he goading the 
peasants of the Western Lowlands into madness ? By the 
act of a reckless dragoon, a poor man is injured. The act is 

' not one of atrocity, or even violence, but rather of the nature 
of a careless accident, incidental to military liabits, and sol- 
diers' quarters, in all ages. Let ns see how " Bloody Clavers" 
did justice between the poor man, and the proud dragoon. 

■ He is reporting the circumstance in a letter to the commander- 

I in-chief, dated, Dumfries, January 6, 1679.' 
" On Saturday night when I came back here, the sergeant 
who commands the dragoons in the castle came to see me ; 
and while he was here, they came and told me there won a 
: 



i 
I 



I oC Cl»T«rtto»»B »ni| tlia 
IM i>f Joan Ihrrraftnr. 






I of M.y f .llaoilig , , 
iijtiu kl Druinclog, a 



122 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



horse killed juat by, upon the street, by a shot from the castle. 
I went immediately and examined the guard, who denied 
point blank that there had been any shot from thence. I 
went and hoard the Bailie take depositions of men that were 
looking on, who declared upon oath that they eaw the shot from 
the guard hall, and the horse immediately fall I caused also 
search for the bullet in the horse's head, which was found to 
be of their calibre. Al"ter that I found it so clear, I caused seizd 
upon him who was ordered by the sergeant in hia absence to 
command the guard, and keep him prisoner till he find out 
the man ; which I suppose will be foimd htmself. His name 
is James Ramsay, an Angus-man, who has formerly been ft 
lieutenant of horse, as I am informed. It is an ugly buai- 
ness ; for, besides the torong the poor man has got in losing Mb 
horse, it ifl extremely against military discipline to fire out of 
a guard. I have appointed the poor man to be here to-mor- 
row, and bring with him some neighbours to declare the worth 
of the horse ; and have assured hini to satisfy him, if the Cap- 
tain, who is to he here also to-morrow, refuse to do it. 

" I am sorry to hear of another accident has befallen the 
dragoons, which I beUeve your Lordship knows better than I, 
seeing they say, there is a complaint made of it to your Lord- 
ship, or the Council ; which is, that they have shot a man in 
the arm with snutU shot, and disabled bim of it, who had come 
this length ■^^-ith a horse to carry baggage for some of my 
officers. But this being before I came to Mofi'at does not 
concern me. The St«wart-depute, before good company, told 
me that several people about Moffat were resolved to make a 
complaint to the Council against the dragoons for taking free 
quarter ; that if they would but pay their horse-corn and their 
ale, they should have all the rest free ; that there were some 
of the ofBcers that had at their own hand appointed them- 
selves locahty above three miles from their quarter. I begged 
them to forbear, till the Captain and I should come there, 
when they should be redressed in everything. Your Lordship 
will be pleased not to take any notice of this till I have in- 
formed myself upon the place."* 

' LiulilhgoH Pjfwii. 



I 



I 

I 



^H thi 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 123 

Thus did Satan controul Beelzebub and ApoUyon, and ad- 
miniBter justice between man and devil. Let us now see how 
he did so on a larger scale, and under more difficult circum- 
stances. While the " chief of this Tophet" was restraining 
his legion, the saints of the conventicle were inHaming their 
devotees to the " worship of God after their own fashion." 
The Primat« was slain, — by no accidental shot from a watch- 
man on the hili of Zion. The assassins Hed to the moors, 
clung to the horns of the conventicle altar, and added new 
fuel to its sacred fires, Claverhouse, somewhat unprcpari;d for 
the crisis, suddenly encountered " tho army of God" at Drum- 
clog, and after a brief straggle, fled from the inglorious field, 
tiie entrails of his noble steed trailing on the ground. 

The received historical theory is, that our hero, after 
this untoward event, deemed by some the result of hia own 
"goading," became exasperated to desperation, and for the 
test of his career was actively occupied in revenging his de- 
feat, by hunting to the death martyr ministers, peaceful 
peasants, and Christian carriers. The truth is, that a cooler 
and more humanely discriminating judgment was never added 
to high spirit, hasty speech, and determined will. Hia disaster 
at Drumclog never for a moment affected hia policy towards the 
deluded people, or rankled in his bosom. The fanatics, how- 
ever elated, were rendered desperate by their own dangerous 
victory, and still more so by their bloody triumph on Magns 
Uoor. The army of martyrs, tho " suffering remnant," had 
to prosecute a skulking campaign, with ropes about their 
seeks. Throughout the years 16S0, and 1681, the tide of 
ftnarchy kept rising in the south-western districts of Scotland, 
•nd Qovernmcnt soon found it necessary to arm Colonel 
Graham with powers that would have enabled him to gratify 
to the full the most vindictive feelings of a revengeful dis- 
position. The principle of his actions, his mode of conducting 
this most distressing and difficult service, the rule of conduct 
which he systematically laid down when first entering upon 
it, evinced dispositions the very reverse. The influential in- 
stigator was the avowed object of his pursuit, and not the 
poor misguided vulgar. With reg&nl to all, his system was to 
threaten with the terrors of the Uw, rather than to put thoee 



124 MEMOllIArS OF TBK 

laws in force ; and he courted subniission to the established 

Government, allegiance to the Sovereign, and a return to peace 
and good order, by every device of an arbitrary power that 
was still unwilling to create distress, or cause blood to flow. 
Let bye-gonea be lii/e-gones, was a phrase frequently in his 
mouth. Hia maxim, and advice to Government was, — pnniah 
ringleaders, spare the multitude ; be uncompromising -with i 
the disaffected rich, but lenient to the misguided poor ; and 
be careful not to swell the ranks of tliose inimical to the 1 
Throne, by a too severe and too general application of the | 
paina and penalties enacted against fanatical rebels. To I 
allow them to worship God after their own fashion in con- 
venticles, was totally out of the question. The most scurri- 
lous abuse of eveiy member of the reigning family, the most 
frightful incentives to lynch-law, the most blasphemous i 
sumption of divine inspiration, the most violent contempt for 1 
the law of the land, characterised the pulpit eloquence of I 
those armed mobs. Claverhonse was not sent simply for the 
purpose of enforcing one particular form of religious worship 
in preference to another, nor was he influenced by any bigotry 
of the kind. His real mission, and desire, was to destroy 
the sway of those evil spirits who presided at the truculent 
gatheriugs where he liiniself had been so nearly sacrificed in 
1679, and to restore the Christian peace and order of society. 
So, the first exercise of his supreme authority, for suppressing 
the western insurrection, was to insist upon the presence of 
all the natives, who dared show face at all, in their parish 
church, as members of a Christian community. At the com- 
mencemeut of the year 1682, he was invested with a royal 
commission of Sheriffdom, and Justiciary, in which his powers 
and duties are thus defined : — 

" Considering that several persons of disaffected and sedi- 
tious principles, in the shires of Wigton and Dumfries, and 
the stewartries of Kirkcudbright and Annandale, have, for 
disquiet and disturbance of the peace, for divers years past, 
not only deserted the pOblic ordinances in their parish 
churches, haunted and frequented rebellious field conventicles, 
and committed divers other disorders of that nature, to the 
great scandal of religion, and cont-eropt of our Government, 



I 

I 



DISCOUNT Of UC.VDEE. 



Iu2 



rlrat lately did break forth inUi, and .joioed in au open and most 
treasonable rebellion ; and, notwithstanding the many reite- 
rated offers of our gracious indemnity to them, they continue 
i in their former wicked and rebellious practices, being en- 
couraged therein by the not due execution of our lawn, and 
hopes of impunity, by their skiilking from one place to another, 
when they are cited before our judicatories, and pursued and 
•ought for by our forces ; and wo being fully resolved that 
our laws shall be put to due and vigorous execution against 
these delinquents, and these rebels brought to public punish- 
ment and example, in places where they have been guilty 
thereof, do, with advice of our Privy Council, require and 
command the said John Graham of Claverhouse, to call before 
him, his deputes and substitutes, the persons frequenting and 
residing in the said shire of Wigton guilty of withdrawing 
from the public ordinances in their parish churches since our 
late act of indemnity, as also the persons guilty of conventicles, 
disorderly baptisms and marriages, harbouring and resetting 
I of rebels during the said s]>ace, ami to impose and exact the 
fines conform to the Acts of Parliament, and to do and per- 
form every thing requisite and necessary for putting the same 
to due and vigorous execution : And considering that the jier- 
■ons guilty of these disorders do remove from one jurisdiction 
to another when they are called in question and pursued, and 
I that we find it necessary for our 8er%-ice, in this exigency, that 
' the persons guilty of these disorders in the places adjacent 
within the said shire of Dumfries, and stewarties of Kirkcud- 
bright and Annandale, be brought to justice, in order to the 
reducing that country to the due obedience of our laws, and 
securing the peace of our government, we, with advice fore- 
■sid, do hereby nominate and appoint the said John Graham 
of Claverhouse to be our Depute within the said jurisdictions, 
[ for putting in execution our laws against transgressors and 
I delinquents, in the cases foresaid, and to uplift and exact the 
t penalties incurred by them thereby. It is hereby declared, 
I that this commission is no ways to be prejudicial to the right 
[ of jurisdiction belonging to the Sheriff of Dumfries, and 
[ Stewards of the stewarties of Kirkcudbright and Aunand&le. 
and that the said John Graham is only to proceed and do 



126 MKMORIALS OF THE 

joHtice in the cases foresaid, when he is the first aitacher. 

And further, we, with advice foresaid, have thought fit to give 
and grant, and do hereby give aud grant to the said John 
Crraham of Claverhouse, our full power, authority, and com- 
miBsion, as Justice in that part, to call before him any person, 
not being heritor, who shall be apprehended for being in the 
late rebellion, and have not in due time taken the benefit of 
our gracious act of indemnity ; and for that efi'ect to fence and 
hold courts, create clerks, sergeants, dempsters, and other 
members of court needful, and to call assizes and ■witnesses as 
often as need Le, absents to amerciate, unlaws and amercia- 
ments to uplift and exact, and, in the said courts to put the 
BBid persons to knowledge and trial of an assize, and accord- 
ing as they shall be found innocent or guilty, that he shall 
cause justice to be administrate on them, according to the 
laws and acts of Parliament of this realm ; promising to hold 
firm and stable whatsoever things he shall lawfully do in the 
premises. Given under our signet at Edinburgh the last 
day of Jannary 1682, and of our reign the thirty-fourth 
year." 

Armed with these tremendous powers, of the sword and of 
the mace, confronted with the perpetrators, instigators, and 
abettors of the moat frightful results of fanatical rebellion and 
lynch-law, " that man, rapacious and profane, of seared con- 
science and adamantine lieart — chief of a Tophet on earth,"- — 
surely, on returning from such a crusade, must have left be- 
hind him the abomination of desolation ? Let us see how he 
went to work, and what he did. His patron at this time was 
William Earl of Queensberry, on the eve of rising to the 
highest grade of the peerage, and the supreme rule in Scot- 
land. His great possessions in those disturbed districts in- 
volved his patrimonial interest deeply in tho question of 
restoring peace and order, and at the same time rendered the 
support of so able and energetic a statesman of vital conse- 
quence to Government, and the Throne. He it was that 
pressed the measure of sending Claverhouse, at the head of 
his troops, into those districts, commissioned with powers 
which no Colonel of dragoons had ever wielded before, and 



I 

I 

I 

J 



VISCOCNT OF DUNDEE. 127 

F*ith "which few indeed could have been safely entmated. ' 
T That he was so instructed and empowered by tlie monarchical 
l^vernnient because known to be tt cruel man, one who would 
3 the sword without sparing, and never temper justice with 
J'aiercy, is a covenanting calumny, and historical myth. We 
■ jball here afford a few illustrative extracts, from his constant 
icorrespondenco T,rith head-quarters, wliich commenced the 
tmomeut he entered the disturbed districts under his new com- 
' mission. About a fortnight after the date of it, he is in 
Galloway, and reporting progress both to the Commander-in- 
chief, and to Queensberry, who at this time was Lord Justice- 
General. On the 16th of February 1682, the " cliief of 
Tophet' thus writes to the " Deil o' Dnunlanrig," from the 
Newton of Galloway : — 

I" My Lord : I hope you will pardon me that you have not 
heard from me till now. I send your Lordship here inclosed 
a copy of what I have written to the General ; which is the 
ilrst account I have given to any body of my concern in this 
country. I shall not need say any thing of the general (atat«) 
of affairs here, having, maybe, given but too long an account 
already. Howc-ver, I thought better say more than enough 
dian omit an^'thing should be said." 
Aft«r entering into various particulars, which will he found 
in that Part of these Memorials where the correspondence is 
given entire, he proceeds to say, — 

" The country hereabouts is in great dread. Upon our march 
yesterday most men were fled, not knowing against whom we 
designed. 
" For securing the rents of the donators and the Crown, it 

■ < Od iha 3d of JuQki? ) SH2, QuMotbeiry, Jantico-GcDtnl, ihi» •rriiM frani 
U* laitiB or SaDquluu- in DnmrriEHihirr, lo Cardan of Hwldn, Ihon LarJ TmidcDt 
" My deu- Lurd i I liad tivvn jm Uiw Iraable miuer, linl that nolbing ocean hara 
worth i il all being prmwable, nre onl; ibal in llie t>»di> nf GiIId*b;> unie af tlw 
retda nMWt ; lul thfir iiumbtr is not runBidtrable, not Bxi!««ding twelve or iiiiitwii, 
■nd Ihrir buxitHn i> anly to drink and qnaml ; ao tlul uaither Church nor Slato, 
in mj judgment, np»d tetr llieni. However, I'm illll of opinion the anoner gani- 
MMu bo plaaed, and a oompeleal partj" wnl willi CUvera liir iconring tiiat part 
of tbo country, Iho better. Boaldea, I'm told fM mnnalielti continna in Annan- 
Ma aad Gkllowa;, but all will certainl; evaniah apon CIa**ni' arrival, aa 1 have 
jlUr^ttn Paftn. 



[ 



128 



MEMOBIALS OP TUE 



i« abiKilately aeceaaarj there be a fixed ganisoD io B^enn 
uiateiid of Dumfries. For vithoot it, I am now follj i 
rinced we can aever Becare ibe peace of this coanbj, 
fannt UuMe rogoea &om their banntfl. * It is a mighty 
place, and proper ahove all ever I saw for tliia use. I sfaall 
glTe this adrice to Dohody hat yourself ; and I do it the mora 
freely, that my Lady told me, if the King wonld bestow two 
or three hundred pooods to repair the house, she n-oold bo 
very well pleased bis sohliers came to live in it. Do in it as 
you think St ; but if it could be done with their Kxiisfadion, 
it would be great service to the King. For having that poat 
sure, I might, with the party I have, answer for the rest.* 

A little further on in the aame letter, he thns announces his 
general plan. 

" The first thing I mind to do, is to fall to work with all 
that have been in the rebellion, or accessory thereto bygirag 
men, money, or arms ; and next, resetters ; and after that, 
field conventicles. For what remains of the laws against 
the fanatics, f will threaieH much, but forbear severe execution 
for a while ; for fear people should grow desperate, and increase 
too much the number of oar enemies. 

" If there be any thing you would have me to do, or any 
thing I do amiss, you will do me great kindness to tell me. 
I shall write often and much." 

This promise he most amply fulfils. He had not been left 
to his own devices in hunting out the fugitated, or the fire- 
brands. The Justice-General had furnished him -with a list 
of those whom he was to apprehend in particular ; and instead 
of, as has been supposed, insulting or assaulting at random 
every pious peasant he happened to encounter on the highway, 
he appears to have been unwilling to exercise his own ludimited 
justiciary powers under his commisRion without first ascertain- 
ing Quccnsherry'a mind on the subject. In a letter dated 
from Dumfries, February 22, 1G82, he thus writes : — 

" I caused seize one in your Lordship's list, at the Thomhill 
hill-fair, called Williamson of Overcaitloch. He is a tenant 

> The fugil&Ud oiiUawB, luch u tlie murrlerera o( Archbishop Sharp, lurking in 
arms »niong the rooora, and designed bj Wodrow, the " Wanderers," and ** Suffer- 



I 



I 



TISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 129 

of Craigdarrocb's, who has wTitten to set him al liberty, upon 
bifi promise to produce him ; which I begged \i\a pardon for, 
till I should heur from your LorJaLip, You desire, by your 
memoraDdum, that I should send to Edinburgh any of those 
persous I take. I can do anything with them your Lordship 
pleases, here, by virtue of my commission ; but lot me know ; 
if you desigu to have them there, it shall be done,' I have 
spoke with most part of the forfeit^id heritors' wives at their 
own houBea ; but see little inclination in them to compound 
with the donatoFB, or make their peace with the King. I have 
so far preferred the public concern to my own, that I have 
not so much as called at French, though 1 passed in sight of it. 
I can catch nobody, they are all so alarmed. My Lord Duke 
Hamilton waa pleased to tell me, befort I parted, timt I would 
do well to lie close in houaeg ; for he would make it so uneasy 
for the whigs to live in the west, that he would send them all 
in to me. But, by what I see yet, I send more in ou him than 
he does on mc.' 

To garrison the disturbed districts at proper points, so as to 
protect the well affected, and secure the peace of the country 
against the ceaseless agitations of conventicle orators, was the 
measure which he most earnestly recommcuded, and to which 
be again alludes in the following postscript to the same 
letter : — 

" Since the writing of my letter, the Provost of Wigton 
came to me and complained of my Lord Kenmure's deforcing 
a meBBcnger, first ; and then, the second time, his factor 
robbed the messenger, and would force him to swear he should 
not reveal that he had taken the letters from him. This is a 
higb misdemeanour; and it is fit your Lordship make bim 
sensible. Fur this, and other things, might help to ruin a 
man who had nofriewln. Your Lordship may see by this how 
necessary a constant force is here, for the execution of the 
laws in ordinary cases betwixt man and man, let be in the 
cuucems of the Goveniiiient."* 

' Qjinetubrrrt' nl I 






Hu l^unt Ju«ii»-GeDent H< ifemitlad the dIIIf* 

laj' rallowiD^, when be bcoainc Lunl High Tr«iuur«r. 

Tha KeamuTfi u( wWni Clavarliutue Iiara writes, ii AlexanJiir Gonloo, tUit 
Viwoaat,Mi<l FaUier of him wlm HU bsbadMl To 1718. He appaan lo hkTa bean 
MMog Ihs diuffwlcd al thin Udio ; far is kU pitriooa Isttar ClaTerhauna wHim, — 



1 30 ME3fORIALS OF THE 

In a letter, dated Newton ui Gralloway, March 1, 1682, 
again he writos on the subject of permanent garrisons, as 
follows : — 

" Tlie proposal I wrote to your Lordship of, for securing the 
peace, I am sure will please in all things but one, — that it 
will be somewhat out of the King s pocket. The way that I 
see taken in other places, is, to put laws severely against great 
and small in execution ; which is yery Just ; but what effects 
does that produce but to exasperate and alienate the hearts of 
the whole i>eople ? For it renders three desperate where it gains 
one ; and your Lordship knows that, in the greatest crimes, it 
is thought wisest to pardon the multitude, and punish the ring- 
leaders, where the number of the guilty is great ; as in this 
case of whole countries.^ Wherefore, I have taken another 
course here. I have called two or three parishes together at 
one church, and, after intimating to them the power I have, 
I read them a libel narrating all the acts of Parliament against 
the fanatics ; whereby I made them sensible how much they 
were ih the King's reverence ; and assured them he was re- 
lenting nothing of his former severity against dissenters, nor 
care of maintaining the established government ; as they 
might see by his doubling the fines in the late act of Parlia- 
ment ; and, in the end, told them that the King had no design 
to ruin any of his subjects he could reclaim ; nor to enrich 
myself by their crimes ; and therefore, any who would resolve 
to conform, and live regularly, might expect favour,— except- 
ing only resetters and ringleaders. Upon this, on Sunday last, 
there was about three hundred people at Kirkcudbright 
church ; some that for seven years before had never been there. 
So that I do expect that within a short time I could bring two 
parts of three to the church. 

*' I wfts last night to wait on my Lady Kenmure, my Lord being from home, who, 
nhe naid, knew nothing of my coming. I told her what pains your Lordship had 
been at to keep her house from being a garrison, and she seemed very sensible of 
it. I am Horry that I must acquaint you, but I shall do it to nobody else, that I 
am certainly informed my Lord Kenmure has conversed frequently with rebels, 
particularly Barscob." 

* Hero is the very doctrine, from " Bloody Clavers,** in the year 1 G82, which 
the wisont and most humane statesmen of our own enlightened age are now incul- 
cating in reference to the Sepoy revolt. 



I 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 131 

I have done, that is all to no purpose. For we 
ir gone, but in cornea their ministers, and all 
It and fill back to their old ways. So that it ig vain to 
think of any settlement here without a constant force placed 
in garrison ; and this is tho opinion of all the honest men 
here, and their desire ; for there are some of them, do what 
they like, they cannot keep tho preacher from their houaeB in 
their absence, — «o mad arc some of (heir wivea." 

So much for a specimen of tho mingled wisdom, humanity, 
and firmness, with which this maligned statesman adminis- 
tered tlie penal laws rendered necessary by the vicious in- 
fluence of fanatical preachers, and conventicle bullies. The 
same admirable letter affords an example of hie practical 
powers of organizing the schemes which his fertile genius 
suggested : — 

" So, tlie thing I would propose for remedy of all this, is, 
that there be a hundred dragoons raised for this countty. 
The King may give maintenance to the men, and the country 
to the horses ; which I shall answer for they shall do, because 
they are all in our reverence. And is it reasonable that this 
country should be at less expense than other well affected 
parts of the kingdom P Do not we pay the supply fur their 
follies ? Have wo not more than they the expence of the 
Militia ? Their disaffection is a good reason why they should 
bavo less trust; but their trouble and expense should be 
equal to ours. 80, when the Stewartry and shire of Galloway 
give maintenance to a hundred horses, which is the one-half 
of the whole expense of the troop, they arc but equal with 
others, considering their wont of militia, and their disorders ; 
and if the Kiug will do his part, I shall undertake for the 
country as a Gialloway laird. The ways I will propose will 
lessen the expense extremely. 

'■ 1. First, if the Duke (of York) pleases, I oflTer myself to 
take tho superintendence of them wilhmtt any pay ;^ and for 
the next olBcor, who is to lie the drudge, he may have six 
pounds a-day by taking two men olf every one of our troops 
of bono. We were sixty, and there is one taken off for the 
Artillery. So thoro now remains fifty-nine, which does not well. 

' " lUpurloiu mi proAuie," he.— Lord Maeamtaji. 




1S2 MEMOIIIAI^ OF THE 

But if these two were taken off, we would jusl be the establish- 
meat of Holland, which is tifty-seven ; and, with the corpo- 
rals in rank, as they ought to be, makes just twenty in each 
rank, which is right for the Cornet." 

" 2. (SecoTuJ), 1 must be excused if I propose to destroy a 
government was made for the Governor's cause. I think the 
pay would be as well bestowed this way ; seeing he has no- 
body to guard but solan-geese and ministers. The first will 
not flee away, and the others would he as well in Blackness 
or Dnrabarfon.i Now, for the hundred men at sixpence a-day, 
I would first make use of the four-and-twenty are in the 
Bass ; remains seventy-six ; wliich would amount to about 
seven hundred pounds a year ; and for that your Lordships of 
the Treasury might find a way to cut off some idle pension ; 
and I hear my Lord Newark is dead, which is four of it ; and, 
if it could be got nowhere else, it were better sell that rock, and 
the money of it would serve both here and in the West ; for I 
could undertake the same thing might be done there. 

" I will assure you there has been no more feasible project, 
though I say it myself. For, first, it would secure this 
country. Then, if those of the West were frustrate of this 
retreat, they would he easier found. Then this might, on 
all occasions, be a brave troop of fusileers, or granadiers, when- 
ever the King had occasion, For I should breed them to 
either, or both, as the Duke had a mind. And I would desire 
leave to draw out of the two regiments a hundred of the best 
musketeers had served abroad ; and I should take horses 
here, amongst the suffering sinners. And, I will take the 
liberty to say, that, whatever may be taken to do it, we need 
more horse and dragoons. 



1 Laurtardale, while in the aBceiident, hnd been made Covcrntir of the Bm«. 
Wodmw'B •poetolic frieiij, •• famous Miialer ShLelds," bus imprisoned Iht-re (as we 
liHve »eeu, p. 111.} but prnvtd nol bo ■dheeivo to it bb the solan geese. Wodro* 
tells u> : " tu Outuber, Itl7l, LaudenUle is made Csptun uf the rock oF Ihe Bosi, 
which in bought bj' the King, ind turned into n prison. Eighteen soldieni, besides 
nffieers, nre placed in it ; and hb shall arterwards meet with many gond ptcj'li 
erammed up iJicre. It was tlie Earl who prevailed with Iho King hia master to 
baj l)iat rock from Sir Andrew RumMi.v, at Ihe rate of four thmiwnd ponnda ater- 
und then gol the reuLi and profile, tnnre than a hundred pounds a jear, 
beiUiHad upon himself."— Witt. *ol. ii. p. ISO. 



riSCODNT OF DUNDEE. 



133 



" If thia do Lut, I may break my head to uo purpose. For 
I know, after that, no other way but to lio as others, and get 
as much money as t can (which I have not thought on yet) by 
putting the laws io execution. I desire, if your Lordship like 
it, you may let the Duke hear it as I propose it ; and speak 
the General, and the Advocate, and my Lurd President, and 
the iiegister, about it," 

So far from evincing the slightest disposition to molest the 
innocent, attack the weak, or oppress the poor, he is continu- 
ally urging the policy of selecting the higher classes of the 
disaffected, on whom to impose the penalties of the law. On 
the 5th of March, four days after the despatch from which we 
have last extracted, writing from Wigton, he says : — 

" You need not expect great things from me on haste, as 
to the seizing any considerable rebels ; for I never make so 
much as the least search for them, knowing how much they 
are npon their guard, if they be not out of the countrj*. And 
by this I design not to harass (he troops till I have made them 
secure. 

" Here in the shire I find the lairds all following thfl 
example of a late great man, and still a considerable heritor 
here among them ;' wliich is, to live regularly themselves, 
but have their houses constant haunts of rebels and intercom- 
muned persons, and have their children baptized liy the same ; 
and then lay all the blame on their wives, condemning them, 
and swearing they cannot help what ia done in their absence. 
But I am resolved this jest shall pass no longer here ; for it 
is laughing, and fooling the Govemraent ; and it will be of 
more consequence to punish one considerable laird than a 
hundred little bodies. Besides, it is jttsfer; because these 
only sin by the examplo of those." 

Proceeding with caution, firmness, and great tact, and upon 
principles so temiwrate and just, Claverhouse apjwar-s to have 
succeeded beyond his expectations in conciliating the disafTccl- 
ed, and driving the real oppressors away from thifi disturbed 
and disorganizpii community : — 

■' I am very happy,' — he writes from Kirkcudbright. 
April 1. IR82. — " in Ihid business of this country, and I hope 

' rriiUbl}' aw Joliu Dull, mj.l.', unrroanU 3il Vixc^iml, anH Ul fjii'l nf SUiIr. 



134 MEMORIALS OF THE 

the Duke will have no reason to blame your Lordship for ad- 
vising him to send the forces hither. For this country now 
is in perfect peace. All who were in the rebellion are either 
seized, gone out of the country, or treating for their peace ; 
and they have already so conformed, as to going to the church, 
that it is beyond my expectation. In Dumfries not only almost 
all the men are come, but the women have given obedience ; 
and Irongray, Welsh's own parish, * have for the most part 
conformed. And so it is over all the country ; so that, if I be 
suffered to stay any time here, I do expect to see this the best 
settled part of the kingdom on this side Tay. And if those 
dragoons were fixed I wrote your Lordship about, I might 
promise for the continuance of it. Your Lordship's friends 
here are very assisting to me in all this work ; and it does not 
contribute a little to the progress of it, that the world knows 
I have your Lordship's countenance in what I do. AU this is 
done without having received a farthing money, either in Niths- 
dale, Annandale, or Kirkcudbright ; or imprisoned any body. 
But in end there will be need to make examples of the stvb- 
bom, that wiU not comply. Nor will there be any danger in 
this, after we have gained the great body of the people ; to 
whom I have become acceptable enough, having passed aU 
byegones upon bonds of regular carriage hereafter. Your De- 
putes were like to have taken measures that were not so secure, 
nor acceptable; but I have diverted them, and they are to take 
the course I do, and I have prevented all other jurisdictions 
by attaching first." 

** Since the writing of this, I have been at church, where 
there was not ten men, and not above thirty women, wanting* 
of all the town. Where there used to be ten, I saw six or 
seven hundred ; and amongst others there was one Gordon of 
Barharon, — to whom, being a rebel heritor, I had given safe 
conduct to come and treat his peace, — appeared in testimony 
of his sincere conversion." 

About a fortnight afterwards, dating from Moffat, Claver- 
house again reports to Queensberry : — 

** All things are here as I could wish, in perfect peace, and 

> Welsh uas one of the greatest of the fire-brands, among the fanatical 
preachers. 

* i. e. Absent. 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DD.NUKE. 135 

very regular. Barbaroti lius assurance of his peace from the 
Council. Bar. lias given me a declaration under his hand ad 
full as I could desire it. I have spoke with a brother of Sir 
Robert MaznoH's, who was out; and Littlepark, and Glencairu, 
are in terms with me, and several others of less note. 1 muat 
sajr I never saw people go from one extremity to another more 
cavalierly tlian this ])eople does. We are now come to read 
lists every Sunday alter sermon, of men aud women, find we 
find few alisent. Mr Alexander does very well at Dumfries ;' 
but I have heard that the shiro does not conform so well; 
and I have heard the ministers complain of the Bailies of your 
Lordship's regality. What ground there is fur it I cannot tell. 
I told Stonhouse, and offered troops to bring the people in 
awe. I have examined every man in the shire; and almost all 
the Sleteartrij of Galloway; and fixed Bueh a guilt upon them, 
that they are absolutely in the King's reverence ; and I shall 
give them no discharge, would they yive nie millions, till I 
have bond from them for their regular carriage, and mainte- 
nance for those dragoons if the King think lit to raise them. 
And if I do this, I think it ia not ill me of that commissiun. 

" Did the King aud the Duke know what those rebellious 
villains they call ministers put in the heads of the people, 
they would think it necessary to keep them out. The poor 
people about Minnigaff confess, upon oath, that they were made 
reuew the Covenant, aud believe the King was a papist, and 
that he designed to force it on them, But I shall tell your 
Lordship more of this when the Dnke cornea down."' 

' Mr Jatang Alcisiider, Slioriff-dcpute of Dumfries. 

' Ihindec'B gml prototype, Montrooe, had judged ihoo evil ■piribt of tlic Covc- 
rratil, •rhoae rkioiu agilaliona deluged Scotland nitli blood, precisalj' in (lio wms 
"•J. Id lii» eUbomle lotler on Sovereign power, •rilwn in 16*0, Im Uiua Bpm- 
iivpliUcH tlioni ; — 

» And Ihou tedilMMt jirtacitr, who dudie* Lo pu( Uie Boven-iuiilj into the jwoplo'ii 
lianda, for ikf iwb ambilitrmt ciufi,— u being ablo, by rliy wicked clni|aenM uid 
li>porriiir U) iiifune iiilo llwlu wlul ttiou ploueBt,— know thi*, that lliia pooplo ia 
ninra iompabln of MVorvisiii]' iliin any odwr. Thou ut Bbuaed like ■ p*<kiii 
1>> th* niiubl*-will»d nebletnan. Cu, go klong with them to ihaks Hie premnt go- 

yUyr lela the ball ||a to l1i« waII, wheru it ciiaaDt ilaf, Uu>l bn nuy talia il at thi> 
<re c*H."— Iwe Ihe aiilhor** Uomolr* of Moalrnaa: Kdiobutsh, 
T. G. SUTcnun, IHAfi, Vul. i. p, 2S«. 



Qovenun 
mJ goai 
»»» Blfl] 
Lat „ 
Dwuth. 

the disaffet 
be carelhl 
Throne, by 
PWns and 
•"ow tkam 
denticles, i 
Joiw ttbuae , 

"unplioa of 

^^o law o( 

j tliMo amoii 

I PUIpOBO 

I in preft 

fef tl. 

k*" '^, 

WtharingB 
W7S, uii t 
*. ""» Sm 

the western i 
^ »» uativ, 
<'''"'c)], as m,. 
mftacement 
Mrmnisaion m 
•"d dotics am 
" Consider!! 
"m" rrincipl 
MO slewartri, 
di«iiuiet Md 
oot onlj ,l„ 
vhtirchee, lia. 
*nd coimnjit, 
great iicanrlal 




VISLOLNT OF DUNDKK. 135 

vcrv rcicular. Barhanm has a<"?urain;c* •■!' lii< iM-atx- t'i«.»iii the 
Council. Bar. has privon nn:- a JL-claniti''ii iiuler liis hainl as 
full as I coukl flcsiiv it. I liaw- >\">kr with a lin-thor of Sir 
Robert Maxwell's, win* was -.iit ; -iii 1 Lifl-j-.-irk. aii«l rr!oiii;:iini. 
are in trriii.s with iii'.-. aii«l viv- :\.\ • :!.• - -i' l'-- :; .:«.-. I must 
say I never saw i.lmij-I- l^, fr..i:i ■ :.. ..x": n.i'v : . aip/iLvr innp- 

cavalierly tliau this jit-v'i'hj •]■•>. V/- -:- v^v. . rii..- t.^ iv;^J 
lists everv SuiiJav alt»-r >«nii. :i. : i;.- :. .:. 1 v.vUi- :.. '..','1 \\*- 
find few ahseut. Mr Ahxa!::-r ' -r v- rv v...;; ^ I; ,;:.:Vi' - ;* 
but I have beard ihat tl-e s].i:- • - :. • .:.:' r.n -■. v.oll : 
and I have hoar«l tliO ijii:.i>:- :- :..:'. :■ ■ il :.:>■- .: V'/;r 
Lordships re;jralily. Wlmt ^: :. '. ■.. ■ - - .' I ... . / ••.ll. 

I told Steuhuusi' and t«tlciv«l i: ■ - ■ •..'.■: . :!, ',:. 
awe. I have cxomhic*/ vwrtf mon .'. -v .^ ^ !;.;..-* '■// 
the Siewnrin/ <»/(r'tfl'»fro If : \yMs\ {\\,\ ^ .. . j * ■ -. \'. ..:j. 
that thej' an* absnlutrly in ihv Kin- - : ■. - . .,:•<. 

give thein no di>«liarj^«', wonhl thuj -j-,'. . . I 

have bond from them f«>r ihoir n-^uhir . u:- ^• 
nance for those drap'uns if tin- Kin;; il,; .• ■ • - .-. - . ■ 

And if I do this, I think it is nni /// ,ur ,.i ...... 

" Did the Kin'-c and tlie Dako know wlj:.* •■ 

I ■ ■ ■ ^ 

villains they «-all mhn'sf* rs pnt in tin: Ij*-.; ;. 

they would think it nri«;s<aiy tn k»;.p ili. i;. ... 

l»eoi>le about ^linniualf f'^iilL--, '//•'/« onfl,, ili^t ,;. 

renew the ('nvi'n:int. an«l ln.lirvi- tlii- Kiii;.r ....,;, ;^ , . ... 

that he (K'si.Lcn«Ml tn I'TiM' if nn t!i»ni. liiit ] ,;. ,, 

Lordship more of lhi> \\h«n th«- lJiik«- <'.iii. - .!■/.■.,. * 

» Mi- James AlrxamUi', Shcnil-acimtc <if I>i.u;in. ^. 

' Diuitloc'H yiv.it proiotviH*, M«nitroM«-, liinl ju-l/i-.J rln v <:mI -;, ru */ e,^ /^,, 
i.uut, whoHO vk-ii us asitatioiiH ailiigiMl .S-ntUml uiili Iil.^,.|, |ir»«aMf/ ^ v^ ^.^ 
w.»v. In bit* rlal"irate ItMUr on .Sixcivi^ii \n,\Mi; wiliti-i, ,„ .*^ ^ ,^ 
I i-ophihcri tlu'in : - 

•* And t!nUl WJ/''MJt/'/V.|.-/|.T, wllOstllilHs|i||.H| ll.i .,r,v«l* /-.^ «#A J.^ ^ . 

1 ;in'lH, f«)r //«.«/ «'Wii iij«''iVj""* •♦■«'*, »•* ^" i":,' »»•!', I.;. •».. .^.unf <r^,^- . . 
l.\|MKTi^v to infiiH' into tiirni \Oi.it llion |.l..;i«M, ii^.u^:^i^ U:^ . 
. iniv iniMi.aliI«* of H)vi ri ii;ni\ than any fillnr. 'I i «/a ^r Mwwf ;;,,. 
1 y tlic niniMtvwittiil nuMiin.in. lin, p» aliin;; with *ji^^ » ^-- j^ 
wninii-nt ; not for ^'. y .•ll./^ t«. ; '■i'/''/'^ /A^ ;.«.yV, wm r. tm. ^ , ^ 
l.la\ei' leth tlu' ball i:- t.. iIm" will. hIh-ii. it r.,„«< my, lw » »» y 

iH.MiHl ^%iili ii»«'>'' .M-i-. -Sr til.- anilior'H McMn / Aai^. , » ^^ 

T. «J. Sifvi-nMin. i:'>'. V..I. i. \'. -'»'•»:. 



/ 



I 



186 MEMORIALS Or THE 

Towards the end of the year 1682, " Bloody Clavers" having 
thus (aa lie imagined), restored to pea^-e and order the agitated 
districts, which, ho himself tells us, — " Before I went thither, 
the Government had looked on, for many months, as almost 
in a state of war, and it was thought unsafe for any thing less 
than an army to venture into it ; the churches were quite de- 
serted, no honest man, no minister in safety," — returned to 
give an account of his stewardship to the Privy Council. The 
details of his very fiill and interesting report, which will be 
found in a suhsequent Part of these Memorials, are precisely 
in terms of his correspondence with Queensberry. His com- 
mission of Justiciary, he says, was not brought into play at 
all, — " For of all the prisoners I made, I found none that was 
ambitious of the honour of martyrdom ; but all renounced 
their principles before they would give t^slimony; save only 
one, upon whom was found Gray's letter, and is now coming 
hither by order of Council ; and even he acknowledged the 
King's authority in civil matters; so that I had no occasion to 
make use of the commission of Justiciary, but set them al- 
ways at liberty, upon sufficient caution to appear when called; 
and that by advice from my Lord Advocate."' And he con- 
cludes his report in this pardonable tone of triumph, a true 
index, doubtless, to the dispositions of the man : — 

" And it may be now safely said, that Galloway is not only 
as peaceable, hut as regular, as any part of the country on this 
side Tay. And the rebels are reduced toiikout bhod; and the 
country brought to obedience, and conformity to the Church 
government, icithout severity or extortion; few heritors being 
fined, and that but gently ; and, under that, none is or are to 
be fined but two or three in a parish ; and the authority of the 
Church is restored in that country, and the ministers in safety. 
If there were bonds once taken of them for regularity hereafter, 
and some few men put in garrison, which may all be done in 
a few months, that country may be secure for a long time 
both to King and Church." 

Such was the policy of this distinguished statesman when 
invested with estraordinaiy powers, and the highest military 



irge Msplieniie of R-i-Mslniigh, upon 
10 rpithcl of " Bioody M.cteoiie. ' 



nlin, vu);pr luluma}' hat 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 137 

^■and judicial functions. TIius were displayed the revengeful 
diBpositions of this great captain, who, two years before, bad 
to fly for his life, at the head of his broken guards, from the 
bloody field of Dmmclog, defeated hy that very spirit of sense- 
less fanaticism which he now so mercifully controlled.' But 
Omham of Claverhouse would have hecn totally unfit for his 

I most responsible and perilous mission, had he not been capable 
of diBcriminating the occasions when justice aud humanity 
equally required that the law should take its course. The only 

I instance, indeed, we have discovered, in his despatches to head- 
quarters at this crisis, of his intentions to visit a notorious rebel 
with the highest penalty of tlio law, would seem after all not 
to have been carried into effect; since, in his report to the 
Privy Council, he declares that he found no occasion to exer- 
cise his functions under his commission of Justiciary. " I 
sent out a party," — he writes from Stranraer, on the 18th of 
March 1682, — " three nights ago. The first night they took 
Drumbui and one M'Clellan ; and that groat villain M'Clorg, 
the smith at Minnigaff, that made all the cliki/s' and after 
whom the forces have trotted so often. It cost mc both pains 
ftnd money to know how to find him. I am resolved to hang 
him ; for it is necessary to make some example of severity, 

' Peontge vHlen, in tlifir ■bettliex of fainilj' hiitniy, generally err in Ilia op|H> 
■ita •xlniue trom oluniay . But llic- anweiiriwl nlumai» anil ruling of tlia fana- 
lical (chnol. cvcnlually eoDctntnitnl and sirBlemaUsail in WudniH'ii enornjoan and 
e H) inrectcd oil niujem liiator)' on Ilie aubject of Viacimnl 




Dondao'a conduct and cliareclcr, that in Wood's edition of Duuglrui' 
l»Ta the foUuwing, tliun which a atatcment more falw never polluted (lie page vl 
i^orj, given un Ihe autliorit; of MbIchIid Laing, ■■ nn unqUMlionnbla hietorical 
fact :— " Ho (Clavt'rl>.>uiH.-) atUcked a conveiilicle on Louden hiJI, in Aynliiiv, lat 
Jane |liTtl,w)wn hin ilmgooni weredufutod with Iota, ly a detachment of undia- 
eiplined peaMnta : He w»m itrmiUeil to attiigt hla defeat bj- the mtM Hrtailfol emrl- 
lira, which pnwiuml him the apprl'*''"" "' Blood> aavera," 

• Probably tUth, or a cniuked knife annliiied «i(b iho apike of tlie .[Mr for 
entliiig Itiinugh tlie briJIea of the dragnon*. Not long before llir aflkir ■! Onini- 
dog, Lord Hobs hoUliiig a command in the (iuarda, and ciupl")ed on the aanii' 
awrice aa CtarerhoiHe, thtu raporla to the Omimamlar-in-cliicr:— " My Lorct, upon 
infonaation Uiat a tenant of Clegborn'a had aonio of thaae HW-/u*Jaa(rf arm. 
HalliburtuD, "itii »ia of tiirl Honic'a troop, were ordered U> aeiM the man ami 
man they gut, hul n<i ariu> but a halbcil only."— Linfitijor J'a/^t. 
" villain M'tloru" i* net aflrrwania mcnlioned by nararliouic, •od ia not 
Wsdr"*! martyri, probably bn had canUrived W e»cape. 



138 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

lest rebellion be thought cheap here. There caimot be alive 
a more wicked fellow. The party is not yet come back, which 
makes me in hopes there is more taken. I am to meet to- 
morrow with all the heritors of this shire, to see how they are 
inclined as to bringing their ]>eople to church, and securing 
the peace of the country^ that 1 may he favourable to thein!* 

Some time afterwards, however, \mting at a more critical 
period, and in a more solemn tone, he delivers his judgment 
upon the awi*ul question of life or death, in terms whereby he 
himself, — as if anticipating the fanatical calumnies that were 
to beset his memory, — intended to convey the truth to all pos- 
terity, that principle^ and not passion, ruled his conduct upon 
such trying occa-sions. 

" I am as soiTy," — he \mtes to the Lord Chancellor on the 
9th of June 1683, — " I am as sorrt/ to see a nian die, even a 
whig, as any of themselves. But when one Aie^ justly, for his 
own faults, and may save a hundred to fall in the like, I have 
no scruple"^ 

But it was not merely by thus pointing a moral that he has 
aflforded evidence against those calumnies. There is a fact 
wherewith to adorn the true tale of his hiunane disi)osition8, 
and enlightened mind, which goes to prove, that even amid 
the storm of those " Troubles," wherein it was his fate to 
wield the flaming sword, this *' man of blood" was so far in 
advance of his age, as to have conceived the design, and to 
have accomplished the lirst step, of ameliorating tlie criminal 
code; and this, too, in a kingdom where, aftor Dimdee had 
bit the dust in battle. King William peremptorily ordered the 
application of torture, as the law of the land, and the very 
soul of evidence. 

We have already aflforded a striking illustration of the dis- 
position of " Bloody Clavers" to care for the suflTering poor. 
Irrespective of his determination to enforce the strictest dis- 
pline among the Beehehuhs and Apollyons of the King's 
(luards, he sympathised (under a feeling less fictitious than 

» Aberdeen Papei-s. The vord IT'A»«/, at tliat time, was never u»ed iu the Lonl- 
.J<)]m-Ru8tM,'ll sense, hut as indirutinji; the nrnied and murderous outlaws of the hill 
conventicles, and their abettors. Coloiud (irahani could nut have moit) stroDgly or 
(Mnjiiiaticali^ stated the principle of his judgment. 



VISCOUNT OF DDXDEE. 



139 



nave 

^^— one 

^^Hliave 
^^" Shan 



P? 



8t«rnfl'H) with the poor mau for the lose of his horse ; aud he 
applied the quickness of his wit to ascertaiit the fact, in order 
that his judgment might be Just. And this sympathy, 
■))eing the natural impulse of his disposition, he extended to 
■ery rebel prisoner under his charge, " even a whig," whose 
case seemed to require it. On the 21st April 1679, he 
thus writes to the Commander-in-Chief: — " I was going to 
have sent in the other prisoners, hut amongst them there is 
CHie Mr Fraucis Irwin, an old in&'m man, who is extremely 
ibled with the gravel ; so that I will be forced to delay for 
or six days." One really deserving such a title in the 
of history, as chief of a Hel! upon earth, would scarcely 
ive displayed any such humane consideration. So long snb- 
[uentiy as May 6th (the day after the murder of Archbishop 
Sharp), Claverhouse again ^vritca: — " My Lord, I hope your 
Lordship will pardon me that I have not sent in the prisoners 
that I have here ; there is one of them that has been so tortured 
with the gravel it was impossible to transport him."' Will any 
lational man doubt tliat we have here good evidence of a dispo- 
sition neither savage nor inconsiderate ? Yet this Mr Francis 
Irwin was a uolorious conventicle preacher, who had been out- 
lawed in 1676 I'or rcl'using to ap|>ear when summoned, and who 
was flcnt to tlio Boss by the Privy Council on the 27th of May 
1679, after that humane treatment of him by bis captor. So 
iWodrow himself reports ; but in his chronicles we look in vain 
ir the trait of humimity recorded above. The letters of Cla- 
rerhouse, indeed, were not before him ; but Wodrow would 
have looked askance at any collection of documents at all likely 
to interfere with the plan of his calimaiitous miirtyrologies. 

" May 22. 1663, I find," says this cUrouicler, " tho laird of 

Claverhouso is matle a Privy Councillor. We have heard of 

Iiu particular diligence in the persecution, and wc ehall bavo 

•fterwards more instances of his severity; and, as a prcniiuiu 

his uawoaricd elforts to hoar down tho Presbylerians, he 

taken into tlie management of the affairs, being made a 

•ivy Councillor.' 

It did not suit Wodrow t') make any discoveries, however 
Lthentic. or lying in the direct path of his researches, that 

' t.lnlUliRow Pipcn. 



140 ' MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

luight teud to establish a totally oppositi: character in favoi 
of the maligned Claverhouse. His object wan to '" aggravate 
the crimes of our enemies." Colonel Graham, as a reward for 
his able, dangerous, and most harassing services in support of 
the estabhshed government and the Throne, was gifted with 
the jurisdiction and residence of the Constabulary of Dundee, 
about the same time that Lo was made a Pri\-y Councillor. 
His very first act, when lie found leisure to reside there for a 
short time, and to examine into the state of his jurisdiction, 
was to reform its criminal code, by relaxing the severe penal 
laws against petty thefts. How came the Reverend Bobert 
Wodrow, while searching the Privy Council records, entirely 
to overlook the following, which relates to the very period 
when, according to the martyrologist, the ferocious and inhe- 
rently cruel dispositions of Claverhouse were at their culmi- 
nating point? 

" Edinburgh, lOtb September lfi84: Whereas, it being re- 
presented to the Lords of his Majesty's Privy Council, bg 
Colonel Graham of Claverhouse, C-onslable of Dundee, that 
there are several prisoners in the tolbooth of that burgh, for 
petty or small thefts, or picking, which will be fitter to be 
punished arhilrnrlly than l>y death, — The said Lords do there- 
fore give full powers and commission to tlie said Colonel 
Graham of Claverhouse, Constable of Dundee, to restrict tha 
punishment appointed by law, against such persons within bia 
jurisdiction already made prisoners, or that shall hereafter ba 
made prisoners, upon account of the foresaid petty and small 
thefts, or picking, to an arbitrary punishment, such as whip- 
ping, or banishment, as /te shall find catise."' 



I 



A few months after this remarkable trait of a humane I 
and enlightened mind, the services of Colonel Graham of i 
Claverhouse were again required in" his military capacity. 
Again, and with a sterner hand, be had to controul the inaur- 
gency of the west of Scotland, at the crisis of the expected 
advent of Arpyle, whose very name was the orifiammo of ' 
fanatical rebellion. How the lynch-law of the Kirk was pre- 
vailing at this very crisis, we h&xe already shown. The epi- 

' tttyiil. Srcrfti Cvncilii ; D^crtta Orig. MS. Gpneml Rcgisler llmin*. 



VISCOU-NT OF DUNDEE. 



141 



I 
I 



[ 



Faode of Jobu Browii, who, Wodrow says, was colled the 
' Cbiistian Carrier," occurred in this campaign. Recently 
exaggerated into historical importance, it was disregarded at 
the time, as being uo more than a miserable little boil, of the 
Troubles, that burst under the finger of Claverhonae. Ou the 
3d of May 1685, he thus reports, as usual, to the head of the 
Government, now placed in the hands of his patron, and con- 
stant correspondent, William Douglas, Duke of Queensberry, 

} and High Treasurer of Scotland. 

f " May it please your Grace, 

" On Friday last, amongst the hills betwixt Douglas and 
the Ploughlands, ' we pursued two fellows a great way through 
the mosses, and iu end seized them. They had no arms about 
them, and denied they had any. But, being asked if they 
would take the abjanUion, the eldest of the two, called John 
Brown, refused it; nor would he swear not to rise in arms 
■gainst the King, but said lie knew no King.* Upon which, 
and there being found bullets and match in his house, and 
treasonable papers, I caused shoot him dead; which he suffered 
■very unconcernedly, The other, a young fellow and his ne- 
phew, called John Brownen, offered to take the oath;* but 
would not swear that he had not been at Kewmills in arms, 
at rescuing of the prinoncfB. So I did not know what to do 
with him, I was convinced that he was guilty, but saw not 
how to proceed against him. Wherefore, aft«r he had said 

■ On tlie b«rJora of Laiiarksliirc unl Ajreliiro. 
- ■ All Ihlt, ba il rvroemlior^, in the face of Ihe King's tranpa, uniler umii. 

* Tb* oath of khjiinition which th««e dangerauii relwts wrra rei|uire<) to UJu. 
Wd Dulhiiig to Jo with their roligiou* tenets : il waa msra]; lo abniilve tbanurlvea 
ttrnn maaonable deiugn*, and mardcroua niaehiDatic>n«. SujhI SkitUn touk Ihe 
•Mh which Hainl Brum nifiuicd. See before, p. CI. But tlio latter, who *aa ihol, 
dace be prefHrred it, by the mililarj' under the orden of tlie Privy Cnuouil, doabt- 
U<m knew, tliat, bad be ao demeaned himaelf aa li> have euabled the ailllary coa- 
nander to diapenHi with h» execution on the epnt, be wiiulil lure bern referred to 
the Juxlieiiu-y D.url, and bangrd. His name ia in tlie liat iif fugitated outlaws i ba 
had [uugbt against tlie Cn>wu al Bothnell Uridjje ; had been aliulkiag in armed 
rabellinn erer since i and liarboured in bia outhw care aa many young recraila aa 
ba oniitd sednea into the aame path of arimliial outrage agonal aMBblUhed l*w uid 
Ihe Throne. 



MKMOBIALS OF TUE 



his prayers, and carabiuea presented to shoot him,' I offered n 
to bim that, if he would make an iugt'iiiious confession, and 
make a discovery that might be of any importance for the 
King's service, I should delay putting liim to death, and plead f 
for him. Upon wliieh lie corifosaed that he was at that attack 
of Nc'wmills, and that he hod come straight to this houee of 
his uncle's on Sunday morning,* In the time he was making 

■ Tliis is dsciflivo of the fact lltiil llie Boldiere bail not mutinied, or reTiued to 
iiliey ilie order for military execution. 

• Wo liave been unable to diswivpr in WodroH',orany of llio oilier inartyrolo|icii 
of the Kirk, no account of this affair at Newmilla, or of iliia J'Jtn Brottim, tlie 
" Cbriatian Carrier's" nephew and tisociaie. Tbe absence of any notice of him. 
in tlie TariouH fanatical aeconntn of bin nncle's execution, iiiilicatea twiv ignonnt 
and apncryphal all thow aceounla are. Brtmniii, or Bnieaing, ia merely a varielj 
of tbe name Brown ; and probably in [hi« iDBlance was adapted in order to iliatin- 
giiit-b the nephew fnnn the uncle. It would mini that Colonel Gnihum'a fulfilntent 
of his promise, to slate extenualing cirrumtitanceB to heid-quBrters in bebatf of the 
nephew, had naved hia life ; for we can iliworer n" record ot lii« martyrdam. 
With regard to tbe iflair of NevnillB, the only notice we have found, ia a fanatical 
and UDVouchcd tradition, anything but IruMwortiiy in tbe details, wliicb Is thoB 
given in tlie New Statistical Account, r. 83H :— 

" The Old Torer in iVnTHKV/*.— Tills old tower, itself without any Iilstory, wm 
the Bcene of more than one tranBaction ohHrocterietie ■ of tbe troublaui tiiDM.' 
Tliia was Captain Inglia'a head -quarter* when in the dietriet. In one of the expe- 
dition* of Inglia*s troops in the scai'cli of conventiales, eight meu who were rfjMw- 
rered pragma in Iltc Black Wood, near Kiinumock, were taliBn prisonen. One of 
them, il it laid, was iiNTnerfiiik'^ tttcvtcd, and (he soldieiii, in mockery, kicked his 
head for foot-ball along the Newmills pnhlic pveu. In^iis was aioni to lAool tbe 
others, wheo it tea* ngfnlrd to him that it woold be pnidtM to get a writtm order 
from Edinburgh for the cxecu^oD. TheHHH u(*,in the mean time, were confined 
ID the old tower. But while the troop was absent on oni of ilt blaudy i 
tbe oxccplion of a small guard, a man named BnncMug, from Laufine, wilb otberm 
who had been with him tXAirdi jtf oh, got large sledge hammerafrom the old unitliy, 
still in eiiBtoncB, with which iJiey broke open the prison doors, and parmitled 
CoTenanters lo escape. John Law, brotbei^iu-law to Captain Nisbet, was shol 
this exploit, and is buried close to tlie wall of tbe old tower. The dragoons ■ 
went in pursuit of the prisoners, but they had reached the hnlher, and tliere 
caralry could pursue them. The soldiers, however, having ascertained that Jobn 
Smith of Cronnan had given the mnaways food, went to Smith's house, ai 
ing bim at his own door, >hot him dead ! Within a short period his grai 
be seen in Ihc garden of the old farm-huuae." 

The last ulaled fact of the grave, is. of course, (o be taken aH proof of all 
No other proof is offered in this sympathizing version, the apocryphal fealnres of 
whicbmust strike any impartial reader. They would seem, however, lo retote to the 
affair men^oned in Colonel Graham's report of John Brown's eKeeulion ; and. It 
will be observed, the above tradition has il, tliul ■' u man named Bron 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



143 



I 

t 

I 



lliia confession, tlie soldiers found out a house in the hill, un- 
der ground, that could hold a dozen of men, and there were 
.awords and pistols in it; and tliis fellow declared that they 
,1>elonged to his uncle, and that he had lurki^d in that place 
euor since Botliwell, where he was in arms. He confessed 
that he had a halbert, and told who gave it him about a month 
Hgo, and we have the fellow prisoner. He gave an account of 
the names of the most port of those that were there, They 
were not above sixty, and they were all Galston and NewmilU 
men, save a few out of Streven parish. He gave also account 
of a conventicle kept by Eenwick at the back of Camtable, 
where there were thirteen score of men in arras, mustered 
and exercised, of which number he was with his halbert. He 
tells us of another conventicle about three months ago, kept 
near Loudon-hill ; and gives account of the persons were at 
both, and what children were baptized; particularly that at 
Camtable, which was about the time that Lieutenants Murray 
ftnd Crichton should have let them escape.* He also gives 
account of those who gave any assistance to his uncle ; and 
ire have seized thereupon the goodman of the upmost Plough- 
lands ; and another tenant, about a mile below that, is fled 
upon it.' I doubt not, if we had time to stay, good use might 
be made of his confession. 

I have aeiuitted myself when I have told your Grace the 
case. He has hccn but a month or two vntli his halbert ; and 
if your Grace thinks he deserves no mercy, justice will pass 
uu him; for 1, having no commission of Justiciary myself, 
have delivered htm up to the Lieutenant-Greneral, to be dis- 
posed of as he pleases.^ 

" I am, my Lord, your Grace's most humble servant, 

'■ J. GRAaAMK." 

ftctiutllr tlie rinsleader id the rewuf, anil l»<l been »l Ilia riMng »l Ait,U M^h. 
«hcn Sftint Caoieroo obuitied his crown of nurljTclom, 

■ " Shoald linvc," for " liad," ■ mmmnn tdium llien. 
Muilfearij' John Druurn was ■ ringlfailFr, and dpcpcmv chanelcr. 

> Ovlng lA wans jialuutjr od tlie (Art of hia pairou aad Mrraapondpni (lu«n>- 
barr^, tlia PMneot Colunel (iraliam had racentlf been umittsd fniDlboliai at Pri*y 
Couiidllara, and lir wus nicrrlv ictinf: in Ilia DiiUlvj i-ii|iii<-i tj «l llii-i iinio. 



144 MEMORIALS OF THE 

In reading this authentic record, brought to light for the 
first time nearly two centuries after the event, — ^History mean- 
while polluted with the most violent and contradictory 
nonsense on the subject, — ^we must bear in mind the version 
(!oncocted by Wodrow. The " Christian Carrier," he says, 
" was no way obnoxious to the Government, except for not 
hearing the Episcopal ministers." He was not pursued and 
taken in the act of endeavouring to escape from the military 
authorities ; but, under no imputation of crime, and suspecting 
no evil himself, he was wantonly seized in the vicinity of bis 
own peaceful cottage, while placidly occupied with his rural 
labour, unaccompanied save by his wife and child, — ^in short, 
simply in an attitude of muirland peace, and pastoral inno- 
cence. Moreover, as regards both his demeanour and his 
gifts, he is likened to the inspired apostolic saints. He had, 
indeed, Wodrow somewhat inconsistently adds, " been a long 
time upon his hiding in the fields." But why ? Not because, 
as we now learn from his own nephew and pupil, he had 
fought against his Sovereign at Bothwell Bridge, and had there- 
after continued to skulk in arms among the hills, labouring 
as he best could to revive the crushed rebellion and civil war, — 
but, as Wodrow has made so many believe, because a blame- 
less life and shining piety were qualities which, in the year 
1685, suflBced to render their saintly possessors amenable to 
the cruelty of an uncovenanted Grovemment, and its merciless 
officials, who systematically outraged the laws both of GU)d and 
man. Under these circumstances, we are told, it was, that 
Colonel Graham of Claverhouse, directed solely by the impulse 
of his own fiendish nature, abhorrent of the unobtrusive piety 
of an innocent peasant, — without putting the ordained oath 
of abjuration to his victim, without connecting him by a single 
circumstance with sedition, treason, or rebellion, and vouch- 
safing no interrogatories, but mere ribald words of contumely 
and abuse,^-decreed the instant death of one of the most 
innocent and least dangerous of the peasantry of Scotland I 
And more than this, that his diabolical dragoons, devoted, as 
they are described, to the accursed Clavers and his cruelties, 
but converted on the spot by the irresistible efiect of the poor 
man's gift of prayer, mutinied to a man, and positively refused 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 145 

r to obey ttie inliumtiii commaBd. Aud so, " the chief of thie 
I Tophet" was " forced" to put liia own hand to the niurderouB 
work, which lie performed con amore, quitting the scene of 
blood with a heartless insult directed against the bereaved 
wife of the martyr, and a blasphemous cltallengc addressed to 
the God of mercy.' 

Those who value it, arc welcome to the desperitte plea for 

I Wodrow, that against hia evidence, that of Claverhouae him- 

I Mlf can be of no avail. The above IcttM was written under no 

[ idea of defending himself from calumny, or of any other ver- 

f iion of tlie story having arisen. It is a plain official report 

I rendered to head-quarters, by an officer of the highest position, 

and whose word was as good as his oath. Had a mutiny of the 

I dragoons under hia commaad really oompelleJ him to use his 

I own pistol, ttie circumstance must have been prominent in his 

1 leport. And how high in the estimation of those who knew 

I him stood his character for foarleea truth, we may here iUus- 

I trate from a letter addressed hy the Duke of York to the jealous 

L Queensberry, who hail expressed some suspicion of Claverhouae 

Inving injnred him at court. Writing from London, June 26, 

1683, hia Royal Higlinesa says : — " I have had no complaint 

from Clavers, nor any else, about the delay there has been of 

adding some ofBcers to the horse and dragoons ; nor have 1 

had so much as one letter from Clavers of any kind ; and I 

> " 'Riero >re, however, oilier nionaniemts ef a later and niMl unhappy period 

I ff Seotlub hiatory, whieh lell hul loo amguiraeailii (1) of the suETerings and death 

K af our bran pro^ilm. Tho moM rcmarbnlite of tlieae monumenta ia the gniTe- 

le of DK JoKn Brtn, erected on the farm of Crie«thill. The death of ttai> mo* 

I W^ perpelraled with such euld'blouded eraelty, naar bii utin habitation, and iu 

« of bis wife and Family, that to visit hia graie ia cenaidered a lort of 

age by tbe j^ioia of all pintaimnt ( ') The alone beam thai be was shot 

I illlnMJjh tlie head by a fiarly (ommnudtd ty Graham of ClaTorhouac, while upon 

kneea, andintlieact of pnjer Jt i$ laid Lliat ClareilioDiie, or one oT bit party, 

4 n/i kit Htad bo-1), and varrird il la hia wife, aakioit her, ' what aha thonght 

L W Jicr huabaod I' ■ Malr,' aaid ahe, ■ than CTer 1 did, but the Lord will arenfn 

hia anotbor day.' A new moDament hai lately barn ereoted on the nitp of the old 

M, niitaUa to the ta>U> and lilwrallly of lh<- prewnl linim."^iV'ir Statinlcat 

itaimml ^Se-Hand, vol. v. p. 1A3. 

Evas lhi> traidi oC rulgar tradition, calum'iioua aa it in, p'lailltely euumuliela 
J IVodrow'a veraioD, and alwi dilTan materially from Ihal given by Walker Ilia 
[. pdlar. Wbftt ia mllad the " O'il Hiatotr," sot np too haMlIy for ilinta Slai.-tiriq 
I Accuuiila ef Scotland, are of liltte aarvice to lUalory jnvper. 

10 



I 
I 

I 



146 MEMO[il\I£ OF Tirr 

iiin confident they (lo him much wrong who report he should 
coy 1 am (hspleasod with you ; since I assure you there iB no 
such thing, and that he is not a man to say thirtge which are not." 

6. Patrick Walker /he Pedlar^s version of the death of 

John Brown. 
Wodrow waa not permitted to reign without rivalry over 
the fanatical calumnies and history of Scotland. A pedlar, or 
packman, of the name of Patrick Walker, beat him in 
blasphemous f^uperstition, and outliid him in %-ulgar popularity. 
Though low-minded, and all unlettered, he wrote nonBenae 
with more vigour, was less tedious in his calumnies, and falsi- 
fied with a epice of poetical genius. But the genius was of the 
rankest material, and altogether devoid of real talent. WalkeF 
published his fanatical pamphlets and martyrologies a few 
years after WodroVs folios appeared, and it is somewhat 
amusing to find these apostles of the Covenant immediately 
at loggerheads on the subject of their common adoration. 
The pedlar, indeed, is very unreasonably dissatisfied with the 
amount of homage paid by the minister of Eastwood to the 
suffering remnant. He cannot abide that the followers of 
Haint Cameron, the martyr of Airds Moss, should be dubbed 
Cameronians, even by a covenanting chronicler. But surely 
it was a compliment to that arch-rebel. He objects, more- 
over, that they who hail organized themselves into a Society 
for the promotion of armed rtbeilion, and a murderous bigotry, 
should be designated, in no insulting mood, and by a congenial 
spirit, Society^ople. " It may be," he says, " and will be, 
sorprising, stumbling, and oifenBivc, to all thorovgJi-paced 
Presbyterians, in principle and practice, who are well versed 
in the faithful contendings through the periods of this Church, 
especially in our last period of persecution upon which Mr 
Wodrow vmlea, to find him, a toping leading Scots Pres- 
byterian, in such gross mistakes, misrepresentations, and 
groundless, slanderous reflections upon the faithful followers 
of the Lamb : giving them so many nicknames as Cameronians, 
Society-people, the warm party, the warmer sort, warm, hot 
persons, the violent party, highflyers," &c. " But this," ha 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDra. 147 

adds, " is the fulsome, unwholesome air he has lived in, being 
overrun and over-driven with the backsliding spirit of the 
day." So much for the clerical authority implicitly relied 
upon, in such matters, by Fox and Lord Macaulay. Tlie 
minor martyrologist contradicts the major even in the thread- 
bare asBUmplion that is so valuable to whig historians, " Mr 
Wodrow Bays, — ' It was tlie violence of the persecution that 
drove some people to extremes and wildness.' He might have 
laid the saddle upon the right horse. It was the defections, 
silence, and unfaithfulness of ministers and professors that 
much prevailed with Johu Gib, and others with him, to run 
in these extremes, as some of them yet alive cau witness." 
Who shall decide when Doctors disagree ? 

To adopt both of these worthies, as authority for traditional 
facts, was out of the question. In their most important illus- 
tration, of the aainily character of such champions of " faith- 
ful eontendings," as they who murdered Archbishop Sharp, 
and of the satanic character of the great statesmen who 
•truggled to uphold the government of Scotland, against such 
deeds, with all the terrors of the unreformed criminal code of 
Scotland, Wodrow and Walker essentially differ. Wodrow 
tells us, circumstantially, that the dragoons under the com- 
mand of Colonel Qraham mutinied to a man, against hia order 
for the execution of John Brown, and that he was tlins com- 
pelled to perform the office of executioner with his own hand. 
- Walker, without deigning to notice the version of his rival at 
•U, tells us, no less ciTcumstantially, that Julm Brown was 
executed in mihtary form ; that, by order of their command- 
ing officer, six dragoons dismounted for that purpose ; and 
that " the most part of the bullets, came upon his head, which 
scattered his brains upon the ground," — the natural result of 
■ military execution mercifully performed. Humiliating to 
history, and to genius, is the fact, that both of tliese versions 
have been separately and arbitrarily adopted to form a clap- 
trap page of popular history, and that by historians of the 
highest credit and ronown. Sir WaltiT Scott, doubtless under 
the influence of a poetical feeling, adopted the wild but 
dramatic fable of the pedlar, without the slighteet reference 
to Wodrow. Lord Macaulay, by reason of the political strain 



148 MEMUUIALS OF TUE 

(ircdominating in liis history, prefers tb« more outrageoiw 
calumiiy of Woiirow, ami, in like manner, on the other haiid, 
luia utterly ignored both the pedlar and Sir Walter I SoHie 
hold it for an axiom that a tradition cannot have been in- 
vented. A close inspection, however, of the annals of the 
CovenaQt, must lead any candid enquiier to the conclnsion, ' 
that a pure, or rather an impure invention, may pass into 
tradition and even become matter of history. But if there be 
two traditions, of tlie same event, diametrically opposed to each 
other, surely one of them at least must haw been invented ? 
In the case of John Brown, our great^^t modem authors, 
pandering to vulgar error, and popular excitement, instead of 
anxiously and strictly ministering to historic truth and justice. 
l»ave jMiircd off, as it were, upon the contradictory versions, ' 
and left the students of history to discover the truth. " It is 
astonishing," said Charles Fox. philosophising with a wet towel 
round his laurelled brow, — " how many facts one finds related 
for which there is no authority whatever." 

Patrick the Scotch pedlar's life of Peden, the Scotch saint, 
is a burlc5i]ue upon biography, and an outrage against truth 
and common sense. The drifl of it is to prove that this in-, 
aaue conventicle preacher, was fully endowed with miraculous 
powers. There is no end to the blasphemons absurdities which 
form tlio staple of the pedlar's biography of Peden. We can 
only afford U> present our reatlers with a few examples, in 
order to characterise the record from which history has de- , 
rived version the secotid of the martyrdom of John Brown. 

In the year 1685, the epoch of the Christian Carrier, the 
Reverend Master Alexander Peden, then vomiting liis fana^ 
tical rapsixlies in Ireland, was. as the pedlar assures as, 
miracvlouslif informed of the death of Charles II., — " the newa ' 
of which came not to Ireland for twenty-four hours there- 
after," Peden and his disciples were singing a psalm at the 
side of a wood, and making a terrible noise. Their apostle 
had commanded, " that none of them open their mouth to 
sing, but those who could do it knowingly and believingly ;" 
the result of which was, not to render the choir more select, 
but to cause, that " the greater part could not contain and for- 



VISCOUNT UK DUNDEE. 



149 



bear aingiiig, but brake out with their hearts aiid whole 
Htreiigth, 90 that they were uever witness to such loud sing- 
ing, through tho whole psalm." Towering above this inarty- 
rological melody, was hearil the voice of Pdlen, (who maunged 
al'ter all to die in his bed), — " Pack, aud let us go to Scotland ; 
pack, and let us go to Scotland ; let us flee from one do- 
vouriiig sword aud go to another ;" to which slartliug uu- 
uouncement he added this inspiration : " I'll tell you good 
news; keep in mind this year, month, and day ; and remember 
that I told you, — that tho enemies have got a shot beneath 
the right wing, and they may rise and fly like a shot bird, but 
ere this day seven years the strongest of them shall fall." Not 
only was he thus miraculously premonished of the death of 
Charles II., hut the fact that tho King had been murdered by 
liiii own brother and successor, had been vouchsafed uuto this 
propliet. For, on the following night, Pcdcn emerges from a 
wood wJiere he had been all day, and stalking into the house 
of one Mr Vurnor " where several of our Scots BulTerers were," 
comforts and enlightens them with these words ; " Why are 
you so discouraged ? I know you've got ill news of the 
dreadful murder of our Ineude in Scotland ; but I'll tell you 
good news. That unhappy, treacherous, Iccherons mau, who 
has made the Lord's people iu Scotland tremble these years 
bygone, has got his last glut, in a fortfly disk, from kia brother, 
and he's lying vrith his tongue cold in his mouth." 

Every thing that I'edcn said or did at this time was mira- 
culous. The bark which was to convey him aud his disciples 
Hc'cretly to Scotland, was obtained under his miraculous direc- 
tion, He never opened his mouth that he did not prophecy, 
or aETurd miraculous information. His whole demeanour was 
blasphemously imitiitive of the inspired Apostles, " He, and 
twenty-six of our Scuts suU'erers," says the pedlar, "came 
aboard ; he stood ui)on the deck and prayed, — there not being 
tlm least wind, — where he made a rehearsal uf limes aud 
places, when and whore the Lord had licaril and answtirtd 
llieni in the day of their distress ; and now they were in a 
great straight.. Waving his hand to the west, from whence 
ho desired tho wind, he said, ' Lord give us a loof-fuU of 
wind ; till the suils, Lord, aud give in: a frci-h gale, mid lei u.« 



150 



UKMOUIALS OF THE 



have a awift aud Bafe passage over to the blood; land, cM>m« I 
of ue wliat will.' John Muirhead, Robert Wark, and others 
who were prescut, told me, that when be began to pray, the 
sails were all hanging straight down ; but ere he ended, they 
were all like blown bladders." 

Hia many miracles, performed in community with the 
" suffering romnnnt," are all minutely and undoubtingly re- 
corded by Patrick Walker. None of these elect needed to 
dread the proximity of Clavers and his bloody crew, if " old 
Sandy," — the name with which Peden petted himself, — was 
near them, and condescended to exert his powers to save. A 
boy who had been sent for provisione, was pursued by the 
military on hia return. " The lad ran," says Walker, " and 
six of them pursued half a mile, and fired hard upon him ; 
the bull went close by hie bead ; all that time Mr Peden con- 
tinued in prayer for him, his alone, and with the rest, being 
twelve men ; when praying with them he said, ' Lord, shall 
the poor lad that's gone our errand, seeking bread to support 
our lives, lose hia ? Direct the bullets by (past) his head ; 
however near, lot them not touch him ; Good Ixtrd spare the 
lap of thy cloak, and cover the poor lad : And in this he wa» i 
heard aud answered, in that there waa a dark cloud of mist 
parted him and them." I 

Upon another occasion the prophet was in some jeopardy 
hinisolf, along with several of his disciples, aft«r whom 
'■ BiiclKobub and ApoUyon" were in full cry among the hills. 
Old Handy, sadly blown in the chase, — which it eeema odd 
that ho should bave submitted to at all, — suddenly called a 
halt, and botoi>k himself to his usual familiarity with (?od. 
" Tliou he began and said : ' Lord, it is thy enemies' day, hour, 
and power ; they may not be idle ; but, hast thou no other 
work for them but to send them a/ler vs f Send them aft«r 
thorn to whom thou wilt give strength to flee, — for our 
Hlrengtli's gone. Twine them about the hiU, Lord, and cast 
the lap of thy cloak over old Sondy, and his poor things, and 
save U3 this one time, and we'll keep it in remembrance, and 
tell it to the commendntion, of thy goodness, pity, and < 
passion, what thou didst for us at such a time. In the mean 
time there was n dark chitd o/mi'at cavu^ betwixt them." 




I 



VISCOO'T OF OCNDEE. 151 

Afl for the Devil, he had no chance with old Sandj. Hiding 
one day in a care in Galloway, with a fanatical familiar, who 
went by the name of Little-John, he sent the latter io for^e 
for him, " John said, — ' Sir, I am not i\'illing to leave you in 
this place, your alone, for some have been frighted by the devil 
in this cave.' ' \o, no, John, you need nut fear that. I will 
take my venture of him for a time.'" Peden, of course, im- 
proved the occasion. "John went, and the people willingly 
gave bim aome meat. When he came back, he (Tedonj said, — 
' John, it is very bard living in this world ; incarnate devils 
above the earth, and devils bauxiih the earth ! The Devil has 
been here since ye went away ; I have sent him off in haste ; 
well be no more troubled with him this night.'" 

Sometimes, however, old Sandy, iiu^tead of saving from mar- 
tyrdom by a miracle, would rather hurry on a ripe disciple to 
his crown of glory. The fullovring anecdote will serve as an 
illustration of the truth of Claverhouse's complaint to Queena- 
berry, — " Did the King and the Duke know what those rebel- 
lious villains they call minisfers, put in the heads of the people, 
they would think it necessary to keep them out." Upon one 
occasion Pe<len was lecturing in the house of some fanatic, 
apon the Tth chapter of Amos. " He repeated these words in 
the 9th verae three tttneg : ' And I wUl rise against the house 
of Jeroboam with the sword/" In case this broad hint might 
Dot he understood, he suddenly became more explicit. One 
John Wilson, a knight of the clt/kies, being of this select con- 
gregation, Peden " kid his hands on the said John, and said, — 
' John, have at the unhappy race of the name of Stewart : Off 
the throne of Britain ihey shall go, if all the world would set 
dde and shouller to hold them on.'" The biographical pedlar 
gravely adds (what would seem to be sufficiently accounted 
for), that " John Wilson suffered martjTdom in the Grass- 
market of Edinburgh the next year. May 1683." 

It was, as we have seen, in the month of May 1685, that 
that other more famous knight of the tiykiea, John Brown, 
" suffered martyrdom," in military form. Upon this occasion 
Peden's powers were only evinced by a miraculous foreknow- 
ledge of the event. " This murder," says Patrick Walker, 
wa« commitl«ri betwixt six and seven in the morning. Mr 




■ 
I 



I 



Pedes VM ■boot Im a-demi mfle* <fia«ai, ha tuift 1 
dw SMa wO va^kl. Be came to the knK* betvixt 
lad M^it. and desimi to call in the famij, that he 
ptaj aaoa^ tbem. He (aid, — Lord, wben vih tboa ani^B 
Bnmm'9 tloodf Oh ! let Browm't Hood be pCKaow in th; 
s^t; and bastes the dajwbeB then It aTepge it. with OiiiiO' 
ne'ii, CargflTK, and many otbos of onr martciB' mmci And 
oh I for thU da; when tbe Lord wonld areage all tbeir Uooda. 
Wbm ended, John Mnufaead' enqnicd vbat be meant bj 
Bnt^a iloodf He said, twice orer,— Wbat do I mean? 
CSaTerbotue bae been at the PreriiiU this momiog, and haa 
cmellT' nmiderad 36ba Brown. His oorpee are Ijing at the end 
of bis boose, and bis poor wife sitting weeping b; bis coipee. 
and not a sool to speak comfortaU^ to her.* Tbis morning, 
after the son-rifing, I saw a strange apparitim) ia the firma- 
ment ; the appearance of a t^it bright cl«ar-ebining star, lall 
Trom heaTeo to the eailb ; and indeed there is a cleat-ehining 
light fallen this da; ; the greatest Christian that eTer I oon- 
vereed with.* 

Thns, at ten or eleven mike distanoe &om the spot, the 
prophet Peden was miracnloosly cognisant of the conditioa 
of poor John Brown's corpse, jnst one boor after the shots were 
Bred vhich closed his career of tieasou and rebeUion. But it 
seems that old Sendy bad be«t a timely retreat himself Irom 
the Tenr place. He had been sojonniing with the martjr and 
bis wifo inimediatelT before, and bad bolted betimes, uttering 
a mysterious fee-fa-fom, as if smelling the blood of the Chris- 
tian carrier about to flow. A]l this we gather from Patrick 
Walker's version of the tragedy, which suggests the question 
why this cloud-compelling apoetle of the Covenant had not 
rather iuterposcd his miraculous powers to save ? 

'■ lu the beginning of May 1685, Pedeo came to the boose 
of John Bronii and Isabel Weir (whom he married before he 
went last to Ireland), where he stayed all night ; and in the 
morning, wb^n he took bis farewell, be came out at the door, 

' Mraniiig nane heuM ten or ricvcii miles dintaiH Itiki: Ihr place »h«« Jnlin 
(tmnn oki cxecakid. 
> Tliis John MDirhai4 "as hinged at Kyr, 37tii [>ewn>ber 10S6. 
' Hue ranic thv [iiiij>Ih'I not I>i knnw, nr to lell, thai Jolm Hraii as npphew 



»iri. k. 



f Itt^n carried 'jff to suffer 



roiin ^m 

and ^M 



VISCXJUNT UF DUSD>X. 



153 



saying to himself,--' Poor notuan, a. fearful moming,' twice 
over, ' a dark misty morning.' The next morning,' between 
five and six hours, the said John Brown, having performed 
the worahiji of God in hia family, was going, with a apade in 
hia hand, to make ready some peat-ground;' the mist heing 
very dark, (he) knew not until bloody, cruel ChiVfrhovet com- 
passed him with lliree troops of Iiorse, brought him to bis 
hoUEie, and there examined him ; who, though be waa a man 
of a stammering speech, yet answered him distinctly and 
solidly ; which made Claverhouee to examine those whom be 
bad taken to be his guides through the moors if ever they 
heard him preach ? They answered, — ' No, no, he waa never 
a preacher,' He said, — ' If he has never preached, meikle 
has he prayed in his time.' He said to John, — ' Go to your 
prayers, for you shall immediately die.'' When he was pray- 
ing, Gtaverhouse interrupted him three times.* One time 
that he stopt him, he was pleading tliat tho Lord would 
epare a remnant, and not make a full end in the day of 
his anger. Claverhonse said, — ' I gave you time to pray, and 
ye're begun to preach,' He turned about upon his knees, and 
said, — ' Sir, you know neither the nature of preaching nor 
praying tlmt calls this preaching,' — tlien continued without 
confusion. When ended, Claverhouae said, — ' Take good night 
of your wife and children." His wife standing by, with her 
child in her arms that she had brought forth, to him, and an- 
other child uf his first wife's, he came to her, and said, — 
' Now, Isabel, the day is come that I told you would come, 
when I spake first to you of marrying me.' She said, — ' In- 
- deed, John, I can willingly part with you,' Tlien ho said, — 
' That's all I desire ; I have no more to do but die, I have been 
in case to meet death for so many years.' He kissed his wife 



' Bat Jnhn Brawn wui exeouced on ilia Hrn of May. It vera n 
hovrcTar, ti> expect perfect urcuney of datot from audi ■ cliiMuicIrr u tlila. 

• Nn DoliM of bi> rippheo, /i^K Hrotntn. 

■ We now kuow, fniui Colopcl Grsham's own report to lifml quMten, tlint 
till* uvuuni uf hi* niada t,t prowcding, upOD Uie mrlmielinly uci'a-iuD, U an >)»< 
iialile falKhiKxI. The wimder ia, however, lliat i( ever impoM^J upon a niia 
reader, tt boani falwhwHl atampad on the faee of it. 

• If inlrm>p>»'l al all, dnul>IleH it nuiild ■» when the fanatic waa vliilunlly 



154 MCfouALS or tbs 

mikd bftixiu. ami wished parckAdeii anul pmnind UeflngB to 
he mnltrplied upon th*;nu azui his Mfwring GftTezhonse or- 
cferai MX mMuir% to J^mA kirn. Tbe most put of ibt bullets 
esm« upon lus Iieail wfaich scmttered his brains upon the 
groond. ClaTerhoiue «auf to A w vi/!r« — ' What thinkest tboa 
of thj husband AO«r, woman ?' Sie said. — ^* I thooght ever 
mnch good of him, and as much now as eTer/ He said, — '- It 
were bnt justice to lay thee beside him.' She said, — ^ If ts 
were permitted, I doubt not bot yoor cmeltj would go that 
length ; bnt how will re make answer for this mornings wock?' 
He said, — ' To man I can be answerable, and for God I will 
take him in mj own hand'^ Claverhoose moonted his Intse 
and marched, and left her with the corpse d her dead kosband 
Ijing there. She set the bairn upon the groond, and gathered 
his brain^ai, and tied np his head, and straighted his body, and 
coTered him with her plaid, and sat down and wept over him ; 
it being a very desert place, where neTer lictnal grew, and 
far from neighbonrs. It was some time before any friends 
came to her. The first that came was a very fit hand, that 
singular Christian woman in the Cmnmerhead, named Jeam 
Brown, three miles distant ; who had been tried with the Tio- 
lent death of her husband at Pentland ; afterwards of two 
worthy sous, Thomas Weir, who was killed at Drumdog, and 
David Steily who was suddenly shot afterwards, when taken.' 
The said Isat>el Weir, sitting upon her husband's graye^«tone, 
ioUl me, that before that, she could see no blood but she was 
in dangf;r to faint, and yet was helped to be a witness to all 
this without either fainting or confusion ; except when the 
shots were let off, her eyes dazzled His corps was buried at 
the end of his house where he was slain, with this inscription 
on his grave-stone, — 

** In earth's cold bed, the dustj* part here lies, 
Of one who did the earth a.H dust despise. 
Here in that place from earth he took departure, 
Now he has got the garland of the martjT."' 

* Tho reader will judge of the trauenManee of this vulgar scolding match, be- 
tween the liereaved (^liriMtisn peasant, and the aristocratic Colonel of the Guardi* 
in prefM^nce of liin own soMicrH. 

' But we have Mliewn that fJnri4 Steel wan not nhot ; he wa8 not even taken alive. 

• I*iitrick Walker's I.ifs and Death of Mr Alexander Peden, Bioqrapkia Pres- 



VISOOUNT OF DDNDEE. 



155 



I 



Prok pudor t Sir Walter Scott lias twice incorporated this 
apocryphal rubbiBh of fanatical pathos, concocted by one of 
the " suffering remnant," with tho history of Scotland. But 
he has accompanied the double record with a singular incon- 
eistency of sentiment. In the historical notes to the ballad 
of Bothwell Bridge, he adds this aalvo to bis own verbatim 
reprint of the pedlar's romance : — 

" While we read this dismal story, we must remember 
Brown's situation was that of an avowed and determined rebel, 
liable as euch to military execution ; so that the atrocity was 
more that of the times than of Claverhouse. That General's 
gallant adherence to his master, the misguided James VII., 
Bnd bis glorious death on the field of victory at KiUiecrankie, 
have tended to preoerve and gild his memory" 

But in what times, it may be asked, was the fact of an 
avowed and determined rebel being liable to military execu- 
tion, or being made to suffer military execution, considered 
an atrocity by the rational mind ? In his History of Scotland, 
however, the same illustrious chronicler, again repeating 
Walker, passes this unqualified sentence npon the distin- 
guished officer and statesman who bad the misfortune to 
command at tho scene of John Brown's execution : — 

bfltriitiui, Tol, i. page 72. Why did bnlh Dr H'Cri« and Lord Macnulnj' pirrar 
WodTDH's Tei7 differenl version nf thla nlumniouB hblc to Walker'af Wen 
Iboe wkrehing histariBDi nol anra of Walker's Tenioa I But Sir Waller Sent! 
h«d npridted it nriatlm, to nri}' aa 1802, in liia liintorinl noles on the ballid of 
Botbweli Bridge, in Ihe Minstreley of the Scottish Border. Lord Macaulay, ton, 
bad sarely peniw-d Sir Walter Scotfa Uitlory of Scotland (Talcs of a Grandfiilhar), 
where Walker'a rersion is again repritiled b;' him u a page of authentic lil«tory ; 
and which page of biilnrj' i^nora Wadrav't ttnioti enlirtty, Pnifenar Af Inun 
■br(»diy retoarii* : ■■ Of tlio two biilorics, that of Wallior a nn questionably roort 
likely to resemble tho truth. He profeaeo to have lieard Hme of the details from 
the nife of Brown, whereu Wodrow gives no manner of authority at all. There 
are, bowcrer, ntf ieiou eireumMauat, even in Walker'i narrative, which miglit b« 
noticed. For example, in the original editioD of hie pamphlet, he etatea, (hat the 
Rnl peraoD ivlio came tu Un Brown, vhile ahe waa watching by her buaband'a 
body, waa, ■ that old aiogular Clirialinn woman in the Cammorbead, namrd Elitabrtk 
Mmiei, three milea distant ;' bnt, in the third edition, thin matron, retaining her 
raaidenev and encominiu, is transmuted intn ^Mia An>in."— (£!saMiMlioa of 
MuanUf, p. 339.) But we now know a more «n>picioui cireumalance. Tbiaal- 
Isged eye-ttitneaa is not reported lo liav* aaid one ward aboat her huabaod'a 
aepbev and companion. Join Rroint'i, ii whom " i-arahities bad been priw^ntad, 
and who wsa carried off, as if to drnih. 



k 



\r,Q 



JTEMOHIALS OK TOE 



" A Bceue of this kind is told with great simplicity ui<f 
effect, by one of the writers of the period, and I am truly eorry 
that ClaverhotiBe, whom, at the time of the Revolution, we 
find acting a heroic part, was a principal agent in this act of 
criteltj/. Nor, coneidering the nukhhlooded, and savage 6or- 
barity of the deed, can we admit tlie excuse, either of the 
orders under which he acted, or of i\ie party prejudices of the 
time, or of the condition of the suiferer, as a rebel and outlato, 
to diminish our unqualijkd detestation of it." 

Sir "Walter Scott's authority, whom he declines naming, waa 
the pedlar Walker, in whose favour he had arbitrarily dis- 
missed the greater Wodrow. From his youth upwards, 
Walker had been a rampant and truculent rebel. Escaping 
the fate due to his crimes against social order, but not alto- 
gether escaping severe punishment, he became an outlawed 
rebel, a member of the " suffering remnant," and subsequently 
one of those blue-lights of the Revolution with which the 
Orange Government cautiously and contemptuously refused 
to burn their fingers. While a young man he distinguished 
himBelf, and attracted the notice of Government, by the 
slaughter of Francis Garden, a loyal volunteer, serving iu Lord 
Airly's troop of horse. This soldier, who, if Walker's own 
story be at all truthful, seems to have been a sort of kuight- 
errant in pursuit of Magua-moor saints, — was at some mi]e» 
distance from his quarters in Lanark, and very incautiously 
on the look-out alone, armed only with liis sword. Early in 
the morning, in the beginning of March 1682, he encountered, 
under suspicious circumstances, Patrick Walker, James Wil- 
son, and Thomas Voung, to whom he gave chase. The ped- 
lar himself, who tells the story, jnore euo, in his life of Peden, 
interlarded with the usual calumnious abuse of the character 
and demeanour of the poor soldier, — admits that they " had 
been in a meeting all night." The nature of the meeting i» 
indicated by the fact that they were armed ; two of them at 
least with fire-arms. Moreover, they had fled, not from a dis- 
inclination to use such deadly weapons, but because, says 
Walker, " We were alarmed, thinking there were many more 
than owe." The bravo trooper, having overtaken these armed 
rebels, challenged, and endcavouicd to lake them, dead 



J 



VISCOUNT OF DONDEE. 



157 



vlive. As they stood violently on the defensive agaiu»t Ihuir 

single opponeut, he made a thrust at WUboq, but only ran him 

I through the coat. Wilson fired, and missed his antagonist; 

I opon which Patrick WaUter shot the trooper through the 

r head with a pocket-pistol. " He got a shot," says Walker, in 

bis Jesuitical account of the matter, — " in the head, out of a 

pocket-pistol, rather fit for diverting a boy, than killing such 

ft furious, mad, brisk man ; which, notwithstanding, killed him 

dead. We searched him for papers ; and found a long scroll 

[ of sufferers' names, either to kill or take, I tore it all in pieces. 

I Ee had also some popish books, and bonds of money, with one 

I dollar, which a poor man took off the ground, all which we 

' put in his pocket again. Thus he was four miles from Lanark, 

I and near a mile from his comrade, seeking his men death, and 

I got it"'- 

Prom tliis we may gather, that the poor trooper was acting 
I «nder instructions, in the prosecution of his duty, and had his 
I icredentials and his prayer-book in his pocket. Walker's eva- 
I sion of any direct statement that he did the deed, indicates a 
, tremor of his heart or conscience, even under the protection 
' of King William. But the context of his own narrative 
I proves, beyond doubt, that ho himself was the hero of the ad- 
I Tenture. Of course he pleads self-defence, as every desperate 
criminal may do who kills the officer of justice. But who 
I oould road, without indignation, what followw from this " writer 
of the period," as Sir Walter Scott so leniently designs him, 
and without a shudder at the Christianity of the Covenant I 
" For my own part," — says tlie pathetic narrator of the death 
of John Brown, speaking of the occasion when he himself was 
the scatterer of brains, — " for my own part, my heart never 
smote me for this. When I saw his blood run, I wished that 
all the blood of the Lord's stated and avowed enemies in Scot- 
land had been in his veins ; having such a clear rail and oj>- 
poTiunity, I would have rejoiced to have seen it all gone out 
with a gush' That famous illustration of gluttony in amours, 
which the poet Byron proclaimed of himself, had been antici- 



■ Life nf P«ilnn, p. 30*. 



1 5s Ml.MORrAI-S OF TBE 



pated by the poetical pedlar, in the expreasion of his ghittony 
of blood.* 



7. 5'iV Walter Scott's characteristics o/Claverhouse. 

Among literary curiosities or puzzles, may be reckoned Sir 
Walter Scott's historical treatment of the principles of the 
Argyle or fanatical rebellion, and the conduct and character 
of its great opponent, Viscount Dundee. One while, the 
severity of bis judgment upon the measures of Grovemment, 
and upon Colonel Graham's fulfilment of such military duties 
as fell to his individual share to perform, would afford a com- 
plete justification of the most outrageous acts of the lawless 
covenanters. On the other hand, the yet greater severity (at 
other times) of his denunciation of the covenanting character, 
and the covenanting rebellion, eeema to justify the most 
severe measures of the Government, adopted of necessity for 
ite own protection, and that of the Throne. Moreover Scotfs 
loyalist view of the subject, would utterly destroy the credit 
of all those covenanting records, chronicles, and traditions, 
upon the general admission of which, — as being the truth of 
the case and not the calumnious fables of an unscrupulous 
sect of clerical agitators, — bis opposite verdict of condemnation 
is entirely dependent. Doubtless in submitting his genius to 
that uncongenial subject, he had taxed it with a difficult 
theme. The mythical nationabty of the covenanting cause, — 
for truly it is not national, — its pretension to patboa, — a 
pathos falsely purchased and grossly misapplied, — had at- 
tracted his nascent powers. He had somewhat rashly com- 
mitted himself, at an early period, to those compromising 
views which really involved (as Dr M'Crie was not slow to 
detect) an apology for the most truculent acts perpetrated 
by the enemies of good order, and of the monarchical govern- 
ment in Scotland.* But while hia imaginative powers were 



I 



Toee W»lker. 

> Scott, mis 
Claverhuuse, a 



s subject of tliis criminal'a life, i 
o liiographia Freibgl/riaHa, »ol. 




31 



iaia*B<<an>ap_<<tf< 



■tbl'^L 



- ' -J - - _ ■ . ^ J ■ ^^- = r- 



I 



~ . - - J. ' 1 - -I - — "— 1^ — I '~ P '■' ^ 







ICO 



UEMOHIALS OF THE 



of course, the promiuent figure ; and romance uot being (he 
medium for transmitting the literal truth of history, the lovers 
of historical justice, under the fascination of that great genius, 
are apt to overlook, or dieregard, the darker trait* of his por- 
traiture of Dundee. After a romantic deRcription of hia ex- 
terior, based upon the characteristic painting by Sir Peter 
Lely, the novelist proceeds thus to describe the morale of 
" great Dundee' as he elsewhere calls him. 

" But under this soft exterior was hidden a spirit unbounded 
in daring and in aspiring, yet cautious and prudent as 
Machiavel himself. Profound in politics, and imbued, of 
course, with that disregard for indi\'idual rights' which its 
intrigues ueuallj generate, this leader was cool and collected 
in danger, fierce and ardent in pursuing success, careless ot 
facing death himself, and ruthless in inflicting it upon others. 
Such are the characters formed in times of civil discord, when 
the highest qualities, perverted by party spirit, and inflamed 
by habitual opposition, are too often combined with vices and 
excesses which deprive them at once of their merit and of 
their lustre." 

In Sir Walter Scott's history of Scotland, again, the alleged 
" cruelty" of the heroic Viscount is more distinctly conceded 
to his enemies : " Viscount Dundee," he says, " was devotedly 
attached to the cause of King James, and redeemed some of 
his /ercer, and more ci-Jiel propmmtiee, by the ViVh/e of attach- 
ing himself to his benefactor when he was forsaken by all the 
world beside."* 

The fierce and cruel propensities onoe conceded, when we 
consider the nature of the accusations upon which those attri- 



1 We hnvf heen tutable to diicoTer ■ liingh aiitlimlic insMliee of Grkluun at 
Ckverlinuse having been " imbnr^d wllli disregard fnr iniUtiilunI ritihts." On the 
noMrmTy, Lia private correBpondcncE Jiscloaei mMi}' indicatiuns uf the very re- 
verse. Keithcr lh therv a uiigle uithenlic iDBtaoce ud record id liia luviag pn^ved 
iiiniBelf « rulhleea in inflicting death,'" Had Sir Walter beeu aakcd fir bU |jruof, 
he could onl; have appealed tu tlie fable at the Christian Carrier. It must be re- 
membered, ton, that when lie piiiiied tlic ehnracler quoted in nur um, he waa DM 
eognisanl of a single eriatiog letter written bv Claveriiouae, or a aiogle document 
id eapabie of (li rowing any ligbt u|ii>n hi* eonduet, senti- 



ig rrom himself, a 



• HIsI 



VISCOrNT OF DUNDEE. 



161 



t 



iwtes are founded, the " \-irtue'' uf aelf-interesteJ ami pcrsoniU 
kttaohment, to a Sovereign eaid to Lave prompted such fero- 
l-eioua aud cruel conduct, can scarcely be regarded as possessing 
Einy efficacy of redemption whatever.' But it is yet more dis- 
tressing to find that Sir Walter Scott is most severe upon his 
favourite hero, when n-riting anonymously as a historical 
E'Critic. Justly delighted with Ids own triumphant romance, 
[and not easy under the attack of an able clerical wTifer, — who 
stood deeply pledged to uphold the sanctity, and veil the 
vices, of the fanatical character in Scotland,' — the Great Un- 
known took it upon himself to review his own immortal Old 
I Mortality. "We do not presume to impugn his right to mystify 
the public by reviewing his own romance. He was bent upon 
the grandest scheme of mystification ; and his genius gloried in 
being shrined in clouds, like the sovereignly of those etherial 
realms, — 



" Where Andtv, giant of the wratcro star. 
With meteor aUtiidard to Ihe drecie unfurled, 
Looks from his throne of clouils o'er half the world." 



1 ~ 

[ 



a ■ note U the end nf llie ileTODtii chapter of Old Mortalilj', Sir Walter 
delinaalei his hero, in Uieae lennB ; " This remarkable pereon united tba 
M t mingly ineonHMent qualities of eooraige and enuCti/, a disinlereated and deToted 
lofalt/ to bis pnnce. Kith a disregard of the rigbtii of his fallow subjecta. He wai 
Iba muerKpulom agent of the Seottiih Privj' Couueil in executing the imnUttt 
(Mfrilia of the Covcmmetit in Scfltland during the reigna of ChaHee II. and 
Jama II. ; but he rrJernud hii ckaractrr by the leal with which he asaerlrd llie 
CMwe of the Uller monarch after the lieviilutiDO, the mililarj' gkill wilb which be 
wpporled il at the bailie of Killiecrankie, and by bis own denlh in ttie arms of 
tictory." Ho* is a mBii'a chancier pedeeined by being shot ! 

' " The late cKoelleiil biographer of John Knox, Dr Thomas M'Crie, had eon- 
lidered the repmentatioDs of I)ie CoTCDanlers, in llie itory of Old Mortolily, as u 
■afair as to demand at hia baoda a very seriDna rebuke. The Doctor forlliwith 
pabliahed, in ■ magaiine called the Ediuburgb Chrisliau luslrurtur, a wt of pupera, 
in which the historical roundations of lliat lale wereallacksd with indignimtwamilh ; 
asd though Scott, when bs HrPl beard of lhe« invecliies, cxprsMod lib resolulion 
Be*er eren to read thorn, he found the imprHtion they wore praduc^ing ■» strong, 
IbU ho soon changed hi* purpoao, and Dually dovotcd ■ very Urge part of hi* 
arOole for the Quarterly Review to an ekborale dcfenoe of bis own picture of Ihe 
CoveDaoton."— LoeUort, tol. It. p. 34. 

Dr U'Crie'a abuse of Dundee is, of conrae, uiimcaaured ; but founded enllrolf 
upon Wodruir. tlo givra the atory of ibe Cbriatiau Carrier trriatiat from Wod- 
row ; kod wiiliuat uking (he iilighleel uolice of tlie telling fad, tlutt the ooDlenipo- 
my biographer of r*deii niiiiulel}' recorded ■ veraion differing cnKniiallf from 
Wudruw's, in the very circu in i lance mnat inimical Ui the fame of Ituntlee. 



!1 



162 MEMORIALS OF'THF: ^^^H 

But our business is witli the cliaraeter »f Dundee in th»t | 
giant's hands. 

Scoll in the first place revitwa the portrait, which he him- ' 
self had drawn, of Graham of CUverhouse, adding, however, , 
as if from a fresh hand, certain comments and iUustrations, by 
way of softening the cliamcteristicB bestoTred upon t, worthy 
who, he says, was " nol uniformly so ruthless as he ia painted 
in the Tales." In tlie same hreath, however, he pronounces 
upon his character and dispositions in a strain that may cause 
the reader to exclaim, " save me from my friends 1' 

" The most prominent portrait," says the reviewer, " histori- 
cally considered, is that of John Graham of Claverhouse, after- 
wards Viscount of Dundee ; and its accurate resemblance can 
hardly he disjmted, thongii those wJio only look at his cruelty 
to the Presbyterians will consider his courage, talents, high 
spirit, and loyal devotion to an nnfortnuate master, as ill 
associated with such evil attributes. They who study his life' 
will have some reason to think that a mistaken opinion of the 
absolute obedience due by an officer to his superiors, joined to 
vtiscmpulous ambition, was the ruling principle of many of his 
worst actions." 

Nay, ClaverhouHe was either " uniformly nithless," or the 
covenanting case against him is gone. If what his clerical 
calumniators said of him, that his nature was incapable of 
yielding to a feeling of humanity, lie disproved in a single 
substantial instance, their credit is altogether destroyed. 
Accordingly, when an incident occurred which Wodrow had 
considered too notorious to be concealed, of his pleading for 
the life of a rebel, the inconsistent benevolence is not ad- 
mitted to form a break in the " uniformity" of his ruthless- 
nesa, but is accounted for, by supposing, that his horrible 
murder of Saint Brown, perpetrated with his own hand very 
shortly before, had left such a nervous quaking in the heart 
of the " man of blood," as somewhat to unsettle his mind I 
" Claverhouse," says the martyrologist, recording an event 
alleged to have occurred just nine days after the death of 
John Brown, — " falls upon Andrew Hislop in the fields, 

• Bol IhciT were nn infllMmU fi-r slnilyinp lli^. life. Sir WaKer Ui 



J 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEK. 



103 



I 
I 



May 10, 1685, and seized Lim, without any design, iia appeared , 
to murder him, bringing him prisoner with him to Eiikdale 
unto Westerraw that night. 1 said somewhat before with re- 
lation to this bitter persecutor, Sir James Johnston of Wester- 
raw ; and the writers of the Cloud of Witnesses observe, from 
Mr Alexander Shields' account I suppose, that he was once a 
covenanter, a great professor, and zealot for the Presbyterian 
establishment ; and even when the teat began to be talked of, 
he pretended a regard for Presbytery, and that he would not 
take the test ; but as soon as the trial came to his door he 
took it, and turned a violent persecutor of Presbyterians, as 
all apostates generally are.' He died about the Kevolution, 
under dreadful torture in body from the gravel, and in no 
email agonies of mind for his past ways. Andrew being taken 
upon his ground, he would needs gignallse his loyalty in hav- 
ing him despatched in the fields ; and, as one empowered by 
the Council, he passed a sentence of death upon him. Ciaver- 
^ house, in this instance, was very backward, perhaps not icanl- 
ing hia own reflections upon John Brown's murder the first of 
tliis month, as we have heard, and pressed the delay of ^ 
execution ; hut Westerraw urged till the other yielded, saying, 
* the blood of this poor man bo upon you, Westerraw, I am free 
of it.'"' This anecdote might have awakened in Lord Macau- 
lay's experienced mind some scepticism as to the truth of 
Wodrow's anecdote of the 1st of May immediately preceding. 
On the contrary, he improves the occasion ailorded by Wod- 
row, and puts it thus : " Claverhouse was just then strangely 
lenienl. Some thought,' that ho bad not been quite himself 
since the death of the Christian Carrier ten days before. But 
Westerhall was eager to signcdixc Ms hyaUy, and extort«d a 
gtdtcn consent."* 

To return to Sir Walter's review of Old Mortality ; notwith- 
standing his deprecation of that character of uniform ruthless- 






whpn III* trial a 






< So did .S^nt S 
fore, p. «t. 111. 

• HbL vol. It. p. Wn. 

• Who tboughi to, vht*, knil when t 
l.i.p.AOI. — II vuwuroclyt»ir ill Lord Mi«>>1ai 
Wodrao'ii wiwWirB,— « the Uood of (hi* poni 

Wntamw, I am free lA It," — atid KaWltuu tlw Kurd*. " ■ wil 



164 MEMORIAI^ OF THE: 

ness with wliich he says, Claverhoase " is painted in the 
Tales," he proceeds, in the review, to paint him worse than 
ever. Indeed, his concluding cut, the unkindest of all, leaves 
the pet character of his romance utterly demolished and 
worthless, reminding us of nothing so much as the Knight of 
La Mancha's too severe test of the quality of that graceful 
casf^ue which he had constructed with such infinite pains and 
ingenuity. Who cares fur Claverhouse if this, the reviewer's 
final judgment, be just ? 

** Enough will, however, remain, after every possible deduc- 
tion, to stigmatize Claverhouse, during this early part of his 
military career, as a fierce mid savage officer ; the ready exe- 
cutioner of the worst commands of his superiors ; forgetting 
that no oflicer is morally justifiable in the execution of cruelty 
and oppression, however the commands of his superiors may 
be his warrant in an earthly court of Justice ;* for the alter- 
native of surrendering his commission being at all times in his 
power, he who voluntarily continues in a service where such 
things are exacted at his hands, cannot be judged otherwise 
than as one who prefers professional advancement and private 
interest, to good faith, justice, and honour.' But there are 
circumstances in Graham's subsequent conduct which have 
gilded over cruelties, that, we shall presently show, belonged 
as much to the age as to the man ; and they have been glossed 
vver^ if not extenuated, by the closing scenes of his life."* 

Was savage, unauthori7.ed, and unjustifiable cruelty, in the 
conduct of a military commander of Colonel Graham s family, 
education, and position, really so much a matter of course in 
•• the age" as to excuse it in *' the man" ? And, the cruelties 
being admitted, what are the " circumstances in Graham's 

* All this morulizing is to the winds ; nor wonld it, if founded on faet, affoTd for 
ClaverhoiMe oven the equivocal defence implied. It could not be shewn that the 
acts of cruelty, faJHcly and vaguely alleged against Claverhouse by such writers a» 
Wodrow, were autlierised by any commisftion, or commands issued to him what- 
ever. 

* Could Sir Walter have oondesccnded upon the precise period, or the partioalar 
ocoaalon, when, as a matter of ** good faith, justice, and honour," Colonel Graham 
of ClaverhouHO ought to haVe " surrendered his commission'* t 

* Sir Walter Scott's review, in the Quarterly, of his own tale of Old Mortality, 
was subsequently reprinted in his Miscellaneous Prose Works, vol. xix. p. 85. 



I 



VISCOU.VT OF DDNDEE. 166 

pubsequenl cooduct" that either did or could "gild over cruel- 
ties' which he had previouBly perpetrated ? Fidelity to the 
master in whose cause he had exercised unjustifiable cruelties, 
death in the arms of victory, while promoting such a cause 
with the sword, could no more "gild over," or "gloea over" 
such criminal antecedents, than suicide can electrotype mur- 
der. If, indeed, Sir Walter be well founded in " stigma- 
tizing" Claverhouse as a " fierce and savage officer," the ready 
executioner of the iMrst commands of his sinful euperiors, 
and as having so acted, — in choosing to retain his command, — 
Ihat he " cannot be judged otherwise than as one who prefers 
professional advancement, and private interest, to good faith, 
justice, and honour^ — then, say we, the author of Old Mortality, 
the inspired minstrel of that spirit-etirring note, — 

" The Gordon haa asked of him whither he goef, — 
' Wheresoever shall guide me the soul of Alontroue ; 
Your Gi-Hue ia abort npaoe shall have lidioga of me, 
Or lhs.t low !iea the bonnol of bonnie Dundee,'" — 

might have abandoned entirely the character of Claverhouse 
to the tender mercies of a M'Crie, and fast the carcase of his 
hero to the hounds of Magus Monr. 

That Sir Walter Scott's predilections were all in favour of 
the hero of Killiecrankie, there cannot be a doubt. But he 
had neither time nor iucUnation to investigate very minutely 
vexed and intricate questions, nor to set himself to refute 
vulgar errors which had become ingrained on thepnbhc mind 
ia Scotland. Uuiversal pupularity was his bank, and he 
feared to break it. No doubt his shrewd and comprehensive 
mind caught more than ghmpses of the truth. In the course 
of his curious historical researches, he had learnt to abominate 
the covenanting zealots, and their merciless ways ; while his 
atrong sense, and intuitive knowledge of himian nature, ren- 
dered him not a little sceptical lui to the mylJis of history, 
whether in the shapt^ of a [toliticul dagon, a monstor monarch, 
a moorland martyr, or a " chief of Tophot on earth." But be 
was toil cautious and loo wise lo attempt to controvert where 
he wa* not prepared to refute; and he declined to grapple, 
publicly at least, willi the popular calumny of " Bloody 
Clavers. ' It wme* to be rather hard, however, nnr.ri a n-itl 



166 MKSIOHIALS OF THE 

personage of history, whose virtues have been obecured by th» 
grossest slanders, ^'heu so great & maetar of fiction seizes upon 
him for the hero of a romance, and, instead of clearing him 
from calumny, only stirs the myre. And surely there is some- 
thing wrong, when romance is professedly adopting history, 
in the coolness witli which the anonymous reviewer of hi» 
own historical novel thus criticises it, — " Yet he was not uni- 
formly so ruthless as he is painted in the Tales" I 

The best proof that Sir Walter had not metliodically sift«d 
the secret history of the period, so aa to form a just or even a 
decided estimate of the character of Claverhonse, is, that he 
displays, throughout all his works, so inconsistent a mind on 
the subject. In the most touching stanzas ever permed by 
the matchless bard, when comparing sweet Teviot's silver tide 
with the tide of human life, the last minstrel is made to 
sing,— 

" I^w us that tide tuu ebbed villi nic. 
It «ti1] reQects to niemorv's eyv, 
The hour my brave, ray only boy. 
Fell by the side of i7r«il Dundee. 
Why, when the ToUejiug musket pUy'il 
AK«itiit the bloody Highlnnd blade, 
Why was not I beside him laid 1 
Euough, he died the death offanKi. 
Enough, he died with conquering Giitiae," 

But Charles Fox, it seems, who, as we have seen, had pre- 
viously passed a very loose fiat of his own in favour of Wad- 
row's authenticity, thought fit to except the great poet's 
compliment to Dundee, from his, the groat whig stateman's 
general admiration of the Lay of the Last Minstrel. Sir Walter, 
writing to Ellis in the year 1805, eays ; — 

" I hope you continue to like the Lay ? I have had a flat- 
tering assurance of Mr Fox's approbation, mixed with a 
censure of my eulogy on the Viscount of Dundee. Although 
my Tory principles prevent my coinciding with his pohtical 
opinions, I am very proud of hie approbation in a literary 
sense.*' 

The fanatical myth of Dundee's atrocities had taken strong 



VISCOU.NT OF DUNDEE. 



167 



hold of the public mind, and even Soutboy l)ecaiQe Jnlected 
with that old cant of political and polemical calumny. Lock- 
hart tells us, that Southey, — " in speaking of hia friend 
Wordsworth's last work, expresses his regret, that the poet, 
in hia magnificeut sonnet on KiUiecrankie, should have intro- 
duced the Viscount of Dundee without apparent censure of his 
character ;" and that Scott had written in reply : — 

" As for my good friend Dundee, I cannot admit his culpa- 
bility in the extent you allege ; aud it is scandalous in the 
Sunday bard to join in your condemnation, 'and yet come of 
a noble Grreme.* I admit he was iant eoit pen savage ; but he 
was a noble savage ; and the beaally Covenanters, against 
whom he acted, hardly bad any claim to be called men, unless 
what was founded on their walking upon their liiud feet. You 
can hardly contreive the perfidy, cruelti/, and stupidity of these 
people, according to the accounts they have themselves pre- 
served. But I admit I had many cavalier prejudices instilled 
into me, as my ancestor was a KiUiecrankie man." 

Bbades of Shields, Wodvow, Walker, and M'Crie I " Jesu 
Maria, shield us well" t But it was not because hia ancestor 
was a KiUiecrankie man, that Sir Walter Scott so blasphemed. 
That inconsequential circumstuuce might, indeed, have told so 
far as to prevent him from calling Dundee a savage, — and yet 
it did not. But neither his head nor his heart would have suf- 
fered him to characterise the Covenanters as beasts on their 
hind legs, had not historical investigation forced some such 
truth upon liis mind. Those excited expressions, from such a 
quarter, are not to be accounted for by mere hereditary predi- 
lections. And as for that passing sacrifice, upon the altar of 
the Covenant, with which Scott was wont cautiously to qualify 
any expression of his inward disgust at the conduct, and calum- 
nies, of the zealots, and bis affection for their antitypes, (as 
if casting n sop to Corburus), there is no authority whatever 
for calling Dundee a savage, unless we arc to rely upon, and 
bow to, " the perfidy, cruelty, aud stupidity," of the '* beastly 
Covenanters" tbemKelvcs. This t^^mporisiug caution ut length 
drove the bard of " Bonnie Dundee" to miJco a plum-pudding 
of virtue and vice, and call it the character of tlialiam of 
Claverhousc, Plnrin;,' him.icif, a^ if wire, between the Throne 



1 68 MEMORIALS OF THE 

and the Corenant, he thus bowed altematelj to either shrine, 
on the «ubject of " Bloody Clavers," presenting ns with a type 
of humanity as fabulous as the Mermaid or the Centaur. 

" Grahame of Clavf-rhou.se, better known as Viscount of 
Dundee, was one of the most prominent characters of his age. 
He was brave, skilful, and indefatigable as a commander ; 
cruel even to atrocity in military execution ;'} and generous even 
to a foible ujion every other occasion. He disgraced the virtues 
of a hero by the sanguinary persecution which he exercised 
against the miserable fanatics ; but lived to exhibit these 
qualities in their primitive lustre, during the misfortunes of a 
Monarch whom he had too strictly obeyed in prosperity. His 
death, in the battle of Killiecrankie, served to gild his former 
exploits with all but the descendants of those enthusiasts 
whom lie persecuted; among whom the name oi Bloody Clavera 
is held in equal abhorrence, and rather more terror, than that 
of Satan himself."* 

But surely Wordswortli, at least, may be pardoned, if, when 
writing " a sonnet in the Pass of Killiecranlde, an invasion 
being expected," he forbore, in those fourteen lines, from 
abusing tlie " noble savage," while naming him thus : — 

** O, for a single hoar of that Dundee, 
Who, on that day, the word of onset gaye ! 
Like conquest would the men of England see, 
And her foes find a like mglorious grave," — 

more especially seeing that the same gifted bard has else- 
where recorded his high poetical sense of the " persecution of 
the Scottish Covenanters," — Sir Walter's rampant quadru- 
peds, — ^by writing another sonnet, under that title, and well 
worthy of the subject, being as doleful and dreary as a Gal- 
loway kirk-bell with a crack in it : — 

** When Alpine vales threw forth a suppliant cr^r, 
'rhe majesty of England interposed, 
And the sword stopped ; the bleeding wounds were closed, 
And Faith preserved her antient purity. 

' Tlio Chrintian Carrier again ! 

» Swifi'ji Works, by Scott, vol. x. p. 1 86, ttntr. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 

How littie boots that precedent of good ; 

Scorned or forgotten, tLou const testify. 

For England's shame, O tister Bealm I from wood, 

Mountnin, and moor, and crowded street, where lie 

The faeadlets marCjra of the CoTeoant, 

Slain by compatriot prot«stan(8, that draw, 

From coundls senseless as intolerant. 

Their warrant. Bodies fall b^ wild swonl-law, 

But who would force Iho soul, lilts with a straw 

Against a champion cased tn adamant." 

Mighty fine. But shall there be neither shame, sympathy, 
nor sonnet for the cruelties committed by the " beastly Cove- 
nanters" ? Could no sonnet be conceived as touching, and 
more true, upon the murder of Archbishop Sharp, in the arms 
of his daughter, on Magus Moor ? The muse of Wordsworth 
himself shall aid us : — 

Wben Magus ]yfoor sent forth a suppliant cry, 

A daughter's writhing fonn was interposed ; 

But the sword stay'd not ; the full caitifli dosed, 

And the Kirb kept her ancient cruelty. 

How lillle boots ibut fair girl's fortitudo. 

Wounded nnil trod on, thou canst testify ; 

For Scotland's sbame, O Megus Moor ! where hlood. 

And scattered brains, invoke the venguful ikr 

To launch its lighliiin^ on the Covenant. 

Foul murder I done by those wLo clare to draw, 

Even froui the Book of Life, intolerant 

Ueath- warrant! ! Bishops bleed by Hell's lynch-Uw, 

But who would slay the Churcb, tilta with a straw 

Agunst a champion cased io adamant. 



We conclude as we commenc«<]. With regard Io Duudoe, 
History has proved an incorrigible calumniator. The moro 
closely wc test her authorities, for the truculent changeling 
she has reared under his name, the more will common acnso 
reject the counterfeit. Were the most confident accuser of 
Clavorhouse to be asked his autbonty for the atrocities im- 
puted to him, he must refer to WodrouK Were he then asked 
to instsnco the best vouched story of hi» cruellies, be must 



I 



170 MEMORIAIS OF THE 

point to the legem! of the " CLristimi Carrier." The whole 
artillery of Dr M'Crie'a famous pamphlet against " Old Mor- 
tality," reBolvGs into that, All the rest is leather and prunella. 
Deprive the able and amiable believer in John Knox of his 
beau ideal of Wodrow, — of his trust iu the perfect integrity 
of Wodrow's version of the death of John Brown, — and the 
guns of Scotch fanaticism, as regards Dundee, are carried and 
spiked. We have disproved the legend of Saint Brown. We 
may safely ask a verdict to that effect from all candid and 
healthy intelligence. That hitherto invincible instance is 
now no more worthy of credence, and no more likely to 
obtain it, in the rational mind, than that the earth rests on 
the back of a tortoise. " My Informations," which Wodrow 
deired not print, " credible wilnesaess, some of them yet alive," 
which he would not or could not name, constitute the alpha 
aud omega of his proof, for all that rubbish of low-bom 
calumny with which the martyrologist manured the Revo- 
lution of 1688, until the history of Scotland stank in the nos- 
trils of men. If it be asked how we have proved that Claver- 
house was not guilty of the other manifold cruelties more 
vaguely imputed to him hy the Wodrow school of history, — 
it were sufficient to reply, that liis character requires no de- 
fence against accusations not attempted to be verified, mani- 
festly dictated by vulgar spleen, and bearing on the face of 
them not a vestige of vraiscmblancc. But more. The leading 
and most circumstantial instance being absolutely disproved, 
Wodrow's whole army of martyrs becomes disorganized and 
destroyed, like the Highland Host when Dundee fell. Nor is 
this all. We have now produced evidence of the highest class, 
even to prove the negative in defence of the maligned hero. 
No man, they say, was ever a hero to his valet. Truer is it, 
that no ruthless ruffian ever showed himself refined and 
humane to his comrades in cruelty. We have tried Claver- 
house by an unexpected and severe teat, — a test never apphed 
to his character until now. \Vhat would the bolievers in 
Wodrow have predicated, from the discovery of the daily deft- 
patches of " Bloody Clavers," written to the " Deit of Drum- 
lanrig," — written from the very fields of his damiung fame, 
from those fanciful scenes of pitiless and petty butchery, whicli 



I 



^^^^ V1SC0U^T OF DCNDEE. 171 

the genius of a Macaulay has delighted to dramatize ? Why, 
that tho martyrologist would be justified, and the whig hia- 
torian triumphant. What diBclosures might have been antici- 
pated from such discoveries relative to the " murderer," who, 
as he left " the good man of the house wallowing in a pool of 
blood at his own door," had turned to the wailing widow vrith 
BUch ribald ruthlessness as this, — " What thinkest thou of 
thy husband now, woman ? it were but justice to lay thee be- 
side him." Why, that every line of his familiar correspon- 
dence would betray the cruelty of his heart, the meanness of 
his intellect, and the vulgarity of liis soul. But what do we 
find ? In letter after letter some unpremeditated but striking 
illustration of the well ordered humanity of an enlightened 
mind, — from his sympathy with " the poor man" for the loss of 
his horse, to his inauguration of the great work of ameliorating 
the frightful Criminal Code of Scotland ! Tho great captain, 
invested with all the powers and torrors of the military and 
civil law amid the troubles of Scotland, who yet anxiously in- 
culcate the doctrine, upon an exasperated Government, — 
" pursue the powerful, punish the ringleaders, hut spare the 
weak, and the misguided masses," — never terrified the little 
" child into a betrayal of its parent.' The military avenger of 

' We luTc no hetilalioD in prODcnmciug tLc fnllowiag pungnipti in Wodrow'a 
hiaUiry, to bo Iho foulest falwboocl «iUi which biatorj- wu ev«r disgricnl. 1l ia 
uttorly untouclieJ, luUllj' iui'aiiBiiiU-iit willi llie wliole Moor of Colanel Gnliama's 
TolumiiiaUB corrospoDdeOGC of the period, and nuiiiifuatlj' uulruo : — 

** I tUTe omitteil tuaay (wrticulan and circuiUBtiDM* of (he nevcritiM of Clarer- 
boUM in the Boalli eountr)' rt( ibis time ; (\i95,en(l<U JmdiTui] bat there is ODo 
rmieifit ioiMiiee I uuiuut pua, which will my/iort IAom )i»eraU, nad ahow, that 
Ibeir uut of the waj' metiiods were net wiliioul Mina laoceiu. lu tlie pariah of 
Cloaeburn, Clattrkoaa riA a parly came to a couii Iranian 'a huuac, upon name io- 
fonnatioii given him igainat the man. It waa litlle waDder ptu/-lf fri al lliia lime 
wben by any meana ttaej could. Thua the <r\iAi /amilg, {getting wme notice that 
theaoldien were n»r by, fled, I<uriiH; a Utile <UU of tijkl or ninf jifan of agt la 
tit Itnm. GaTcrlioiiiw, finding lie itai the mnn'a aou, and tliat by fair meana ha 
Hoiiiil anawer no queaUona, abot one of hia pialala al aomc dialalioo from him. Tlie 
child iloodftrm, and would anawer nii qneatlona Then ha aliol aiioliier |>litol vary 
Dear bia bead wlilch Urril-lji frigkud hiin ; and at lei.glli lie Ml>i ll<em all lie linww 
■iwnt hia/ulArr, llu fa^Un and nti^livnr: Aeeiiniin; in Ui« infonnatiuna tliua 
piKeD, b* Mul hia parties up and down tha nmntry in igueat of auch aa eMapad 
Thnii lr« nintiniiifd uulil Argyls'a defeat, eiereiaing alt manter of trttrititt, 
l[l)iuii>aiiil<inrl.inr niiil ilivrp Irani RMkdn1n,and the adjacent eountry. After 



I 



172 MEMORIALS OF TIIE 

a murdered Prelate, who yet possessed a heart that would not 
permit him to hurry to his jrison a hoary rebel suffering from 
disease, never taunted the woman he had widowed, with vul- 
gar words of blasphemy and scorn. The High Constable of 
Dundee, despotic over a whole community, who caused the 
Privy Council of Scotland, even in the bloody year 1685, to 
sanction his own exercise of a more merciful code, never said 
to a peaceful, unoffending, and Christian peasant, and without 
offering a chance for life, — " Go to your prayers, /or you shaU 
immediately die," Not more surely does the fossil in the rock 
redeem creation from the calumny of barrenness, than is 
Claverhouse redeemed from the charge of stony-heartedness 
by the Jlorce of those long forgotten and buried letters. And 
all consistent with the humanity of his heart, was that noble 
utterance of his lofty and enlightened spirit, — " I am as sorry 
to see a man die, even a whig, as any of themselves. But when 
one dies justly, for his own faults, and may save a himdred 
to fall in the like, I have no scruple." 

the Earl was taken, he went into Edinburgh to the Council, and boasted of the 
mighty feati he had done in the south." — Hist, vol. iv. p 256. 

If ever there was a story which bore the stamp of malicious and ridiculous false- 
hood on every line of it we have it here. And, out of such perilous stuff it is, that 
the vulgar error of ^ Bloody Clavers,*' has grown, to the disgrace of history. The 
idea of a peasant and his <' whole family" flying for their lives at the approach of 
Claverhouse, with the single exception of a little sturdy fellow of eight or nine years 
of age left behind in the cottage, seemingly for no other purpose than to afford pistol- 
practice to Clavcrs I The Colonel was not in the habit of heading in person any 
such roving parties in search of individual criminals. He was thoroughly occupied, 
at his own head-quarters for the time, directing his subordinates, organizing his 
commissariat, and corresponding with Government. Wodrow takes good care not 
even to attach a date to the above ^ vouched instance." 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



PART II. 



THK H ODD AH MAII08CRIPT. 



The late Charles Kirkpatrick Sharpe of Koddam, as might 
be expected from the beut of his ot\ti studies and opinioDB, 
took great interest in our former researches to vindicate the 
character of the Marquis of Montrose. At a much earlier 
period, he himself had turned his attention to a suhjoct no 
less attractive for him, the vindication, namely, of the charac- 
ter of Viscount Dundee. A life of that other greatly maligned 
G-raham, from the very original pen which so curiously edited 
those historical manuscripts, Law's Memorials, and Kirkton's 
History of the Kirk, must have proved a literary treat for all 
but those who Would rather cleave to a popular calumny than 
become cognizant of the actual trutli. The early ardour, 
however, of Mr Sharpe's particular investigation, gradually 
subsided into a conflrmed and more luxurious idleaae of intel- 
lect, — a eonstant search, for his own amusement, after the 
original, the curious, the picturesque, the terrible, and even 
the scandalous ; but generally illustrative of the domestic 
history of Scotland. It was this habit, combined with hia 
qUEiint powers of socially communicating the results, and hia 
general accomplishment s in lettern, that caused Sir Walter 
Scott," — himself frequently indebted lo that redundant source 
of secret and diaractx-ristic history, — to call his friend the 
Horace Walpole of Scotland. But the Memoirs uf Dundee 
were not destined to appear from the \>^n of Charles Kirk- 
patrick Shariw. A considerable portion, however, of his early 
researches on the subject, had been cast into a form approxi- 
mating, at least, to his original design. This manuscript he 
presented, not lone before his death, to the iiiithor of theite 



174 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

pages, with the full permission, indeed the express desire, 
that its contents might be used in any way that should be 
deemed most conducive to the present purpose. 

But the luxurious and fastidious literateur who had com- 
piled this manuscript, only regarded the fragment as a rough 
digest of certain original materials and illustrations, to ai^^ 
the eventual completion of historical memoirs mo^^' lully 
illustrative of the subject. It had remained for jarany years 
beside him in its present inchoate conditiop^" and appears 
to have furnished some of the notea to thps^ curious clerical 
records w^hich he afterwards so canyillv/^ted. 

On perusing Mr Sharpe's mj/Ll^^i, with the view of 
benefiting by his researches, aimJadi^ting the substance, it 
seemed obvious, that, to do so^^hout continual acknowledg- 
ment would scarcely be faij^although in strict conformity 
with the expressed wish of the donor ; and moreover, that 
the interest in this quaint and curious chronicle, so charac- 
teristic of its well known author, would be marred by a dis- 
jointed use of it, and altogether destroyed by disguise. 

Accordingly, the entire manuscript, imperfect as it is, we 
have taken to compose the Second Part of these Memorials, 
trusting that the publication will be acceptable to all who do 
not disdain, or dread, to cast an eye upon any record which 
would redeem the memory of Great Dundee from the base- 
less vituperation of his polemical and political enemies. 

As new materials, or closer research, enable us occasionally 
to supplement Mr Sharpe's fragment, we have adopted the 
plan of incorporating such additions with his text, marking 
the interpolations by placing them between brackets : — [ ]. 
The notes appertaining to the original manuscript are distin- 
guished from our own in like manner. Where we find any 
portion of the manuscript to have been used by Mr Sharpe 
in his notes to Law's Memorials or Kirkton's History, we have 
here adopted whatever modification may have occurred to the 
author himself in printing from his own manuscript. 



ViSCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



FRAGMENT OF MEMOIRS 



DUNDEE AND HIS TIMES. 



LEFT IN MANUaCKIPT BY THE LATE CHARLES KIRKPATRICK 
3. OF BOD DAM. 



I [Section I. — Birih and Parentage of John GraJiame of Claver- 
hoiise — /?M educatttm at home and abroad — His adventure 
with the Prince of Orange at llie batth of Scneffe — Hia 
return to Scotland — His appointment to command a troop 
in the Royal Horse Guards.] 

The antiquity and heroism of the Family of Grahame are 

I BO fuliy authenticated, that they require no fanciful additions 

['from a legend refipecting the wall of Antoninus, now called 

I Orahaine's dyke, which is said to have received its newer 

F denomination from the first hero of the family, who made a 

breach in its rampants. Such histories may mightly become 

the latter page^ of a modem peerage-writer, where the Enighta 

of the Round Table, and Guy Earl of Warwick, are registered 

as good men and true, the progenitors of many e pains-taking 

tradesman who hath achieved a coronet. But they rather cast 

a shade of disrepute on such families as that of Grahame, 

which can be traced to the year 11 28 in a series of undoubted 

proofs ; and, besides, may justly vaunt of a Sir John Grahame, 

the brave friend of Wallace, of a James Marquis of Montrose, 

and of a John Viscount of Dundee. 

Torftous informs us, that, in the earliest times, every inde- 
pendent leader was called Gram, and hia soldiers Grams. 
The name became groat in the north, and waa that of the 
third King of Denmark. " If," says Mr Chalmers in Ids Cale- 
donia, " Grahame be the proper orthography of this distin- 
guished surname, if may be compounded of Gray-kam, the 
dwelling of Gray. But if the proper spelling were Grame or 
Grsemo we might regard the name as a genuine Saxon word, 
•ignifying angry, fierce, grim, austere, savage." 



176 



MEM0RIAI5 OF THE 



Sir William Graliame of Kincardine, who lived during the 
reigns of King Kohert III., and King James I., by his second 
wife, the Princess Marie, daughter uf the former Monarch, 
had one son. Sir Robert Grahame of Strathcarron. His 
joungest son, John, was the first of the family of Claverhouse 
in Angus, commonly pronounced Clovers. This John married 
Marjory daughter of Sir James Scrjmgeour, ancestor to the 
Earls of Uundee. Has successor, again, was also John, who 
took to wife Margaret Betlnme, of that family in Fifeshire, 
once BO productive of distinguished talents, and of gi-eat men. 
[A third John, son and heir of the- last named, succeeded. He 
married Anne, daughter of Robert Luudin of Balgony, in Fife, 
and died about 1580. His eldest son was] Sir William 
Graham of [Cla}-pot3 and] Claverhouse, Knight, who married 
Marion, daughter of Thomas Fotheringham of Powrie, in 
the county of Forfar, and by her had two sons, George, his 
heir, and Walter, ancestor of the Grahams of Duntroon ; and 
also a daughter, Marion, Vflio became the wife of Alexander 
Guthrie of Kinkalilrum.' Tliis Sir William Graham of [Clay- 
pots and] Claverhouse [greats-grandfather of Dundee] was one 
of the representatives of the county of Forfar in the Parlia- 
ment of the year 1633, being joint commissioner with Sir Harry 
Wood of Bonnytown. [He died in 1642.] He was honoured 
by the friendship of his heroic cousin the Marquis of Montrose, 
who intrusted him with the care of his own private affairs, 
together with John, Earl of Wigton, David, Lord Carnegie, 
[Archibald, first] Lord Napier, Sir James Rollock of Dimcmb, 
afterwards Lord Rollo, David Grahame of Fintrie, Grahame 
of Morphie, John Grahame of Orchill, and John Grahame of 
Balgowau." The overthrow of the Marijuis of Montrose struck 

' ' Discharge, David Gulhrie uF Kiolccaldruni to Sir Willioni Grab&mc of Clkveis 
honM, Knight, of the sum of 7000 merks Scots, being llie tocher of Mkrioti hi* 
daughter, now spouse to Alexander Guthrip, fiar of Kinkcaldruni, m^ «>nc, due by 
Tirtue of a contract of matrimonial made betwixt me, Catherine Blair my sponae, 
and the said Alexander my wnc, wilh consent of William Blair of Balgillo, and Sir 
John Blair his sone," &c.,at Dund<^e, A,D. 16ie. Dundeo PHpcri'. in the ponea- 
(ion of KliBB Grahame Gnhamc of Duntroon.— A'' >/« frjf Mr iShai-jit. 

> [These ware the rclaliTes and near conno»ionB of Montmse, who were named 
a* his lutors or curaloni, and who acted moat fsithfull}', as euch nn the death of Ilia 
father, in 162G. Mr Sharpc'a list ia very imperfect. Sea and rompan 
moirs of Montrose,— Edinburgh : T. G. StevcDSon, 1856, vol. i, p. 25.] 



VISCOUNT OK DU.NDKE. 177 

i wliole clan Graham with consternation. Yet pride was 
■ingled with sorrow, when they considered the fortitude with 
K^rbich the chief of their name encountered the bitterness of 
s final calamities. Montrose sustained the insults of Argyle, 
ftlriio glutted bimaelf with the view of his fullen enemy, in the 
lanner that such indignities ought to be borne. He pro- 
vided a gay and costly suit of clothes to wear upon the occa- 
liHon, when the then Cbancellor of Scotland, the son of Camp- 
»U of Lawers, — a rude ruffian and a confirmed rebel, who had 
rested the earldom of Loudon from the King's most urgent 
lecesiiitiea, — trailed ag«inst his prisoner with all the fury of 
ibanness. Intoxicated by unwonted power, he declaimed 
rom bis base pre-emtueuce in the strains of a Bradshaw, 
While the Marqius endured the abuse ia a manner worthy of 
his family and of himself, treating the scurriUties of this out- 
rageous judge with philosophical contempt.' 

8ir William Graham of Claverhouse [the friend and cura- 

»tor of Montrose'] was succeeded by bis son [Gleorge, who died 
in 1645, when his eldest son, another ^r William, reigned in 

> lE U amiuing CDongh to observe vitfa vhikl conlempl Mr Laing traals the little 
I>o«n compcwed by the ftlariiuis iiricr FondeiiuiatiDn. lie could not have been 
more ennged had MontrcHie atlsmptod to pau it nlT as a traDBlalinn from the 
Gaelic : but Hume, a man of delicate taate, co>ni»nda the •orra^aad Voltaire, 
whose judgmeat in such nflaira i> atiU more to be relied upon, aays, — " Le brave 
bomme (MoDCrase) dil 1 see jugea, ^a'jl n'^tait tichi que de n'svoir paa aoei ds 
tnembree pour lue attaches k toulea lee (wrles dcs tDIcs de TEurope, wtntne dsi 
BMMiantetu ds aa lid^it^ poor eon Roi. 11 mit miiQe cetle penata va aaei beaux 
Ten en allant au suppllOB." Voltaira comiuuea— C'^lait un do* plua agrtabJc* 
•■prila ^ui caltivaswDt alora lee letlrea, ct I'iine la pluB heroique qui fijt daiia le* 
tloU Rojaumen." Kaaa; Eur I'lliBtoire g^n^rate, iLC—NoU by Mr SKarft. 

■ IThe Sdelity and anaioty with vliioh the mnitors of tho great Marquia of Moil- 
traae attended to hia affun during hi> mlnoritj', may be itiuatnled by tlio follow- 
iog letter, preeerved among the Sonthmk Papen, written by Archibald fi™t Lord 
NafHer, to MonlrDne's factor for the barony of Mugdok, and in which meritioa ia 
made of Sir William Grahani of Claverhouae, great-grandfather of Dundee :— 

" Aaaured friend : TbeK are to entreat you { becaose the Kiug'a afftiin urges my 
WAyS^^S) *° *>" '"'^ precisely upon the ajilcenth day of thia instant. 1 hare ap- 
pointvd CUTerhouae to meet you lior« thai same day ; bo<»iise thora am tnaujr 
iMap to 4o, I woald have yuar mooting sooner llian was appwuletl when yon were 
bank Ctaniiiooea deeire* me slill, is bis leUere, In desire you lu bring with yvn 
tba Warn rental ; and therefore I enlrait yoa to brlug it wlili you, tlial we may 

I know what etery limaiii in panieiilar |iava (a« la in<«t ri-qumiUi ncn wl»<ii thrv 



ii^ 



1 78 KBKOUAU or TBS 

bis stead. Tliu Ust raised hi^»er the Cortunea of hia funSj, 
and] named tbe Lsdj Jeaa Csmegie, daa^ter of John Earl 
iif Ethie, afterwards Xonhesk. a race era celebrated for iu 
aoshaken loyalty, in the worst of times ; whose nkost anlieat 
bononrg fell to the grotnid together with the tinhappir family 
that conferred them. By this lady he had two daughters ; 
Margaret, married to Sir Robert Grabam of Horphie ; Anne, 
to Robert Young of Auldbar ; and iwo sons [John and David], 
of whom the eldest is tbe subject of these Uemoirs. 

John Graham of Claverhouse was bom in the year 1&43 ; 
aad may be supposed to hare inherited from hia ancestors a 
large portion of that loyalty and courage which he afterwards 
displayed. I do not find that the whigs ever pretended hia 
infancy to have been marked with those prodigies which in 
general polluted the very cradle of their foes. He neither 
■creamed, bit, and made vrry faces, like King Charles the 
First, nor devoured a live toad, which denoted the propensities 
of that cannibal of tlie Puritans, Montrose.' But he is said to 

■re to lake fma,) the ignoruice whereof nu; hinder all Uis boBUM* at this tinm. 
So, not donbtiag of jronr Rpairiag hither at Ibe iBii] day, I rest jaar Ter7 toiing 
friend, 

" Edinboi^b, 1 Sth April, 1G2B."] 

■ [Ur Sharps wai miataken io lapposing thai the weli-vora anecdote of tbe toad 
waa neTer to be prened into the aerriee of the clerical tnditiona aguiut Dnndea, 
Mr Robert Chamben, referring to some " tenenble autboril)'," not otherwin 
named than as " Highland tradition," telli thia atorir : " CU*era, aaja the vene- 
rable authority I am quoting, bad bc«n told by his none of Mme water or rirer, 
taking it> name from tbe word gvou or jfmh, that wotild chance to prove fatal to 
him. He had aleo, when a child, ^ helii of a toad, nticil lu ati taJ/ up U/iiriit 
nu diteortrtd. When hia nurae heard what he had done, and that the naoaeona 
ereatnre had been taken from him and thrown away, she remarked, ' Then yaa 
hare marred mj' diild in the midst ot his glory.'"— iV«M is tit liiitarj oj'llu Rt- 
ttllioiu in l^eoOand, ^0., p. ?HS. It ia remarkable that one «o well read in Scotch 
traditions as Mr Ciiambera, slionld have here overlooked the fact, that ScolilanU 
had hjng preTionsiy recorded the eelf BsiRe tradition of tbe Jfarfau of Montrou, 
Hut " ha is mid Io have atten a toad when ho waa a Baching child ;" being that to 
whieh Mr Sharpe allndea, in his MS. Nor did Mr Shajpe himseir seem to be aware, 
tliat the identical story is elsewhere recorded of the Rtgept ^crfoa, a century before, 
when it is said his father was provoked to exclaim, — " The Devil chew thee, and 
bunt thee, there will never come good of thee." Perhaps it was the French con- 



I 



nexion whieh introdoced thia long-con 
w many of the Scottish aratoeracy.] 



d habit of K 



■o the cradles of 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 179 

have very early resembled hia cousin tbe Marquis, in his in- 
cUnations towards polite literature, as well as in his enter- 
prizing disposition. Having exceeded his twentieth year, his 
father sent him to the University of St Andrews ; where he, 
together with his brother Daiid, was matriculated in St Leo- 
nard's College, 13th February 1665.* He is said to have made 
a considerable progress in the languages, and in mathematics, 
at the same time ingratiating himself, by his talents and good 
conduct, so much T\'ith the Archbishop, Dr James Sharp, that 
hia Grace retained a very sincere affection for him during the 
remainder of his life. 

[A contemporary, aheady quoted, and one who had no in 
ducement to record a character of Dundee the truth of which 
[ he had not ascertained from those who know him best, thus 
Bpeaks of his youthful accomplishments, and subsequent cha- 
racter : " He had made a considerable progress in the mathe- 
matics, especially in those parts of it that related to his mili- 
tary capacity ; and there was no part of tlie Belles Letttes 
which he had not studied with great care and exactness. He 
was much master in the epistolary way of writing, for he not 
only expressed himself with great ease and plainness, but 
aigued well, and had a great art in giving his thoughts in few 
words."' " To sum up his character in two words, he was a 
good Christian, an indulgent husband, an accomplished gentle- 
man, an honest statesman, and a brave soldier ; and, as he had 
few equals among his countrymen in these first qualities, so 
he had no superior in the last." " His Lordship was so nice 
in point of honour, and so truo to his word, that he never was 
known for once to break it,"]' 

It is highly probable that young Claverhouse continued at 
College till May 1668, the end of tbe fourth session from the 
date of his matriculation, as that is tlie time generally allowed 
to a course of philosophy. Having finished his studies at St 

> ColUga Regiitcr. 

■ (The nuo)' letlera, on vkriDui 
for ttw flnt time nubled to bring 

• [Melnoin of SLr Ewiui C»inrn 
u k ebantctuialio of Cl*<rrrl>ouie 



hk word, la eorioiuly CODfiimad hy > puMigs la > laltar froi 
<tB«»ii»b«rry, Klrawlj' qantH. S» b>t<m, p. \tS.] 



nibjocta, written bf Dundoe, uid wbloh we u« 
) light, >II]pi]r prova llio kbovs ■•Hiiinn.] 
I. Sm bctan:, p. S3. Tlio trail here recorded, 
I puDolilioui in poioln of hnnoor, and 



n thike . 



i. 



r UEM0RIA15 OF TOE 

Andrews he repaired to Frnnue, and spent some time in tJie 
military service of that country as a volunteer, in imitation of 
his great model Montrose,' anri many of his countrymen, whom 
the ancient alliance between the kingdoms, and narrow pater- 
nal fortunes, hut most of all the brilliant reputation of the 
French anns, collected around the standard of a foreign mo- 
narch. In Sir David Lindsay's " Ratyre of the Three EstaJtis," 
the parson, after his degradation, saj-s : — 

" The Uevill mak eaxr for this unhappic cht.D'X, 
For I nm young, nnd tbinkisi lill pnx till France ; 
Ami ttik wjigiM, umaag ihe iiii'ii of weir, 
And win my living with my aword and speir." 

After acquiring some military reputation in France, he 
passed into Holland, in the year 1672, where, finding favour 
in the eyes of the Prince of Orange, he was made a comet in 
one of William's own troops of horse guards, of which Count 
Solmeswas the colonel Besides young Graham, the Prince's 
company contained six British volunteers. Of these, David 
Collier, afterwards Earl of Portmore, and husband to the witty 
Countess of Dorchester, was a native of Scotland ; and Mr 
Rooke, afterwards Major-Genera!, Mr Hales, who was long 
Governor of Chelsea Hospital, Mr Venner, son of Vcnner the 
fifth monarchy man, Mr Boyce, and Captain Carleton, were 
Englishmen. 

It was in this situation that he had the misfortune to render 
the Prince of Orange a very signal piece of service, which the 
other requited much after the bent of bis own phlegmatic 
disposition, and the notorious ingratitude of the Dutch cha- 
racter. 

William commanded the united armies of the empire, Spain, 
and Holland, which amounted to about sixty thousand men. 
He was now bent upon the conquest of Picardy and Cham- 
pagne, and had declared that in the latter he was resolved to 
drink wine, — an indulgence he liberally allowed himself at 
certain seasons, — before the conclusion of the year. But, first 

■ [HontnxM travelled for three ^eai 
studied the art military abroad ; bnt he 

of the qunmimi that he shinild, u he ha<j 



is (err ymithful i 

irad foreign nrriee. It wM nn 

ng wife and family at home.] 



it 



^^H coi 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. 181 

'he must subdue the Prince of Conde, whose army was very 
eonaiderablo, being chiefly composed from the gavriaoiis drawu 
out of the conquered towns which Conde had commanded to 
be demolished. On the lllh of August 1674, William at- 
tempted to pass a defile at Scnelfe, near Mens, Ho was at- 
tacked on the rear guard, consisting of Spaniards, by the 
Prince of Condo, at the head of about forty-five thousand men. 
At first victory inclined towards the French, and William 
eeems to have tieen Justly blamed for the injudicious disposi- 
tion of hia troops. But this imprudence he quickly retrieved ; 
and, on the other hand, it was esteemed rashness in Conde to 
recommence the conflict with an enemy so skillfully en- 
trenched. During the retreat of the allies, the horse which 
l>ore the Prince of Orange foundered in the marshes, and its 
royal rider would have been surrounded by the French had 
not Cornet Craham dismounted, and, at the hazard of his life, 
brought him oR' upon his own charger. This brave action 
was peHVinued in an evil hour for himself and his native mo- 
narchs. Had it not been for his luckless aid, the persecutor of 
his family, the evil genius of the unfortunate James, the fiend 
«f Qlencoe, might have sunk innocuous, aud comparatively 
unknown, in the depths of a Batavian marsh. 

Three times was this conflict renewed, and it appears im- 
possible to decide which of the Generals behaved with the 
greater bravery. William, besides the jeopardy from which 
Graham rescued him, escaped another very imminent danger. 
Mistaking a body of French for his own men, he rode towards 
them, ordering them to charge. Their answer, that they had 
no more powder, undeceived him, and he possessed presence 
of mind sufficient to get rid of them immediately, and bring 
up a part of his own army, which put them to flight. The 
Prince of Conde had three horses shot under hiin ; yet, at the 
end of these bloody onsets, this French hero of tlie genuine 
spirit was eager to commence a fourth. In the evening, both 
armies retreated, leaving about fourteen thou&and men dead 
on the field of battle, and the victory altogether dubious. So 
from this prodigal shower of blood, the lauads of hotli com- 
manderfl shot up more luxuriant Uian ever, Their chiviilric 
courHgp, tbeir nmsnnimale presenre of minr], were ii-Ielutii'd 



182 



UEMORIAI^ OF THB 



throughout Europe ; and each returned public and 
thanks to God for the conquest over his antagonist. 

The Prince of Orange could not, in common decent^, allov 
the brave services of Graham of Claverhouse to remain entirely 
unrequited. Accordingly, he made him a captain in one of his 
regiments of guards, very soon after the battle of Seneffe. 
" This," says the author of his MemoirB, " together with bis 
other distinguished merits, recommended liim to the favour 
of King Charles the Second and the Duke of York ;' though 
one is at a loss to guess how. that was possible. In all prol 
bility, neither his promotion nor his merits were at tliat 
riod known to the royal brothers.' 

A short lime afterwards, the command of one of the Scottish 
regiments in Holland became vacant; and Graham, presnming 
on the obligation under which he had laid the Prince of Orange, 
put in his claim. But William, alleging a former promise, de- 
nied his request in euch a manner tliat Claverhouse could not 
brook the affront. He quitted the Dutch service, asserting, 
what I fear is not always the case, that the soldier who pos- 
sesses not the feelings of gratitude cannot possibly be brave. 
Although his resignation could not be pleasing to the Prince, 
it is alleged that, on Graham's departure from Holland, Wil- 
liam gave him letters of strong recommendation to King 
Charles and his brother. 

[Claverhouse appears to have returned to his own country 
from his foreign travels and military education, towards the 
close of the year 1676, or the commencement of the following 
year. The important, but very imperfect Memoir of him by 
" an officer of the army," already quoted, states that he re- 
turned to Scotland in 1677. At that time he must have been 

■ [Mr Shirpe here refeni lo a alight but nekrly contemporary memair of 
Dundee, entiUcd, " Memain of the Lard Viacount of Dundee, the HighUod Okiu, 
and the Husacre of Glenco : with an accouDl of Oundeo'a Officer* after (hey went 
(0 France. By an Officer of the Army : London, printed for Jonos Brown, at the 
Black Swan, I7U." It wai reprinted in Glasgow, t8IS, in the 3d rolume of the 
MuaUaiita ticofica. We do not see r/hy Mr Sliarpe should linve doubled that llie 
military (alente of young Grahnm or Claierhouso should liave reached (he ear* of 
royalty, either shortly herore, or at the time of bia rotura to his nalire country. 
Indeed, the tettera quo[cd in our text, from bis uniahle young chier, the 3d Marquis 
of MoDtmse, sufBciently prove the fact. Most probably he brouglit with him the 
highoit recommend at ioiia from the Piiiico of Orange himsetf.] 



agn 



I 



J 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



183 



I 



sVout thirty-four years of age. We have discovered no 
register of his birth, but in the Decisions of the Court 
of Session, collected by his contemporary Fouutainhall, it is 
mentioned, — " July 24. 1687 : Fotheringham of Powry's ca*e 
against Northesk, Panmure, and Clavers, wa.'s reported by Ed- 
moruitoQ ; and the Lords find his charter cumpiscibue gives him 
a sufficient right and title to prescribe the assize-duty of nine 
fishes out of every boat that passes by Brughty Castle, Ac, if 
■0 be he had possoased forty years by virtue of that title.' It 
is added, however, — " As for Clavers, he was seventeen years 
at iiieiejbrty a minor, and so they must prove forty years be- 
fore that," 4c. Forty years prior to 1687 leads hack to 1647. 
The statement, then, seemingly admitted in Jbro contentioeo, 
amounts to this, that Claverhouse was not twenty-one years 
of age until seventeen years after 1647 ; in other words, that 
he was of age about the year 1664. Therefore he must have 
been at least in his thirty-fifth year when he entered the 
King's service in Scotland, in the year 1677-8. Montrose 
was only in his thirty-eighth year when he closed his great 
career on the scaffold.] After his arrival in Scotland, Claver- 
house seems to have applied to his cousin, the third Marquis 
of Montrose, for some military employment, as the following 
totter, which testifies the high sense entertained of his superior 
qualifications, must have been written in answer to his request. 



'8lH, 



' For the Laird of Claverhouse. 



" You cannot imagine how overjoyed I should be, 
to have any employment at my disposal that were worthy of 
yoor acceptance ; nor how much I am ashamed to offer you 
any thing so far below your merit as that of being my Lieu- 
tenant; though I be fully persuaded that it will bo a step to 
h more considerable employment, and will give you oc- 
casion to confirm the Duke in the just and good opinion which 
1 do aseure you he has of you ; he lieing a person that judges 
o[ people's worth by the rank they are in. I do not know, 
all this, in what terms, nor with what confidence, I can 
my desire to have you accept this mean and inconsi- 
dersble offer; wlipthcr by endenvnuring lo magnify i( itll I cnn. 



1 84 MEMORIALS OF THE 

and telling you, that it is the first troop of the Duke of York's 
regiment ; that I am to raise it in Scotland ; and that I pre- 
tend that none but gentlemen should ride in it ; or, by telling 
you that I am promised to be very quickly advanced, and that 
you shall either succeed to me^ or share with me in my ad- 
vancement. I can say no more, but that you will oblige me 
in it beyond expression. I do not expect any answer to this 
while I am here ; for I do resolve to be in Edinburgh against 
the first or second day of the next month ; where, if you be not 
already, I earnestly entreat you would be pleased to meet me. 

" Sir, 
** Your most affectionate cousin and servant, 

" Montrose." 
" London, February IS/A" [1677-^].* 

[It was not hitherto known that Graham of Claverhouse 
was first persuaded to attach himself to the service of the 
royal family by his own chief, the young Marquis of Montrose, 
grandson to the great Marquis. The fact is yet more interest- 
ing, that this was at the earnest desire of the Duke of York 
himself, who appears from the first to have appreciated the 
military genius of Claverhouse. The following letter from 
the Marquis to his kinsman Graham of Monorgan, written at 
the commencement of the year 1678 (that immediately pre- 
ceding the murder of Archbishop Sharp), affords distinct evi- 
dence of the fact : — 

" For the Laird of Monorgan. 
" Sir, 

" I hope now to be able, within a week or ten days, 
to give you an account, by word of mouth, of my resolutions, 
and the reasons I have for accepting a troop in the Duke of 
York's regiment of horse ; so I shall forbear troubling you 
with a long letter ; only I must tell you that I have all along 
met with a great deal of favour from his Royal Highness, and 
that he has assured me that this shall be but a step to a more 

^ From the original, in possession of Miss Graham of Dnntroon. — NoU 6jf Mr 
t>harpe. 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DONDKE. 185 

' considerable employment. He has a very good opinion of 
Claverhoose, and he bid tne endeavour by all means to get him 
far my Ltetifenanl. ' Therefore, I most earnestly beg that you 
would be pleased to reprcEcnt to him the advantages be may 
have by being near tbe Duke, and by making himself better 
known to him. And withal aesurc him from me, that, if he 
will embrace this offer, lie shall also share with me in my ad- 
Tancemoiit and bttter fortune. 1 need not use many words 
to show you the dieparity that is betwixt serving under me 
Mid any body else, though of greater family, he being of my 
house, and descended of my family. Vou may say more to 
this purpose than is fit for me to do. 1 shall say no more but 
tliat by this you will infinitely oblige, 
" Sia, 
" Your most affectionate cousin and servant, 

" Montrose." 
" London, Feb. 19. 1677-8."' 

Such a letter, so earnestly yet so modestly expressed, from 
the most amiable of noblemen, speaks volumes in favour of 
the character which Claverhouse by this time had acquired. 
Of the very same daf«, the writer of it addressed the letter to 
Claverhouse himself which has been already quoted.] 

Soon afterwards, when the religious perturbations demanded 
a larger military force in Scotland to quell them, and it was 
deemed expedient to raise three independent troops of horse, 
and as many of dragoons, Ring Charles himself named Graham 
of Claverhouse as commander of one cavalry troop, allowing 
Lord Lauderdale to dispose of the other commisBions as he 
thought good. This was a very remarkable proof of the King's 
favour, Graham's commission being the only one excepted on 
that occasion. Lauderdale gave the remaining troops of horse 
to the Earls of Home and Airly. And now it was that Claver- 
house began to act that conspicuous part in Scotland, which 
has procured him so much abuse, and so much admiration. It 

■ [Tbia i» Ainctiuiva kgiinat IIm conjerlun uf Mr ShKrjw (mlm Iikd not omh thi* 
latlcr), Ihal CLiTGrhaiuo Iu4 airplied for tlii* Mrrioo. If tim pro*** llul tha royal 
family bbd beiwme cugiuMDl of hia bigli repuuUoii sbniul. | 

' t Prnm llio urigiiisl, in ihn paaHuioii <>t Miu lh»i|;li» of llrijtl«n [ 



130 MEUOKIALS OF TBB 

Via at this period, that, according to the phrase of & late ttifr- 
torian,* whose accuracy of expressioa is far from laudable, he 
chose to " Jbr/eif, in the blood of his innocent, defencelcBs 
countrymen, that heroism so gratuit<yusly ascribed to the Vis- 
count of Dundee ;" as if it were possible to forfeit the honoura 
of fame before they are merited, like the dignities of heredi- 
tary rank before they are enjoyed. But ere we proceed with 
the life of the Viscount, it may not be improper very shortly 
to trace the progress of fanaticism, and to give a brief account 
of the Presbyterian commotions in Scotland, prior to bis 
time. 



[Sbction II. — Review of the State of the Church in Scotland, 
andofthe hading characters connected therewith, Jrom the 
Sejbrmation to the Bestoratum.] 

It is well known that the Scottish Reformation, which 
Anthony & Wood with great propriety might term alteration, 
commenced shortly after Luther's preachments against the 
papal indulgences. The clergy had become rich, and conse- 
quently dissolute. The former fact excited the envy of the 
nobility, and both the animosity of the people. Truth gene- 
rally makes its way, but aided by interest it flies, In vain the 
priests attempted, by burning several miserable beings alive, 
to scare the wild beasts from their prey. Instead of terrifying 
the vulgar, whom such spectacles never subdue, the faggots 
that consumed Patrick Hamilton at Glasgow, composed the 
beacon of universal uproar and resistance. 

The falhng away of many noblemen from the old persuasion, 
was a fatal omen to the Clergy. They beheld the Earl of 
Argyle, the Earl of Eothes, the Earl of Glencairne — " a prims 
reformer," and demolisher of everything sacred, — the Lords 
Boyd, Ochiltree, and sundry others, eager to destroy an order 
almost overtopping their own ; and anxious to mend broken 
fortunes, or increase tliose already overgrown by the Estates 
and Revenues of the Clinrch, — with lands which their original 

I [Mkleolm L^ng. Thia afTected >i 
or hi* Hiatorf of ScolUnd ahonl (he y 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 187 

poeseseoTB hod dedicated to God and His mioiBters, tiot to 
kings and their miniona, — and M-ith revenues, which, fre- 
quently ill applied by priests singly und in communities, were 
Btill more shamefully lavished upouj and abused by, a junto 
of hypocritical rebels, and courtly sycophants, the disgrace, or 
the refuse of the kingdom. The Reforming Lorde drove on 
the Reformation with the most virulent activity, and in a 
short time the vulgar, ever influenced in outrage by their 
superiors, could no longer be awed even into a feigned exhibi- 
tion of respect towards the priests of Baal, as the popish clergy 
were called, or their abominable idols. Though upon one 
occasion four men were hanged at Perth, for affronting a friar 
during sermon by nailing two rams horns on the bead of 
8t Francis, and putting a cow's tail to his rump, the rabble, 
conversant with the poetical ribaldry of Sir David Lindsay of 
the Mount, and of Lord Glencairn, continued their scurrility 
uid riolence. They compared the establialied clergy to all 
manner of unclean animals. They alleged that holy water 
was no better than wash, or tvorse. They termed the Queen 
Regent Jezabel, Herodias' daughter, and the woman that rode 
upon the beast. " She was made Regent," says Enox in his 
history, " in the year of God 1554, and a crown put upon her 
head ; as seemly a sight, if men had eyes, as to put a saddle 
upon the back of an unruly cow." Daily increasing in strength 
and courage, they by degrees continued to pour forth a bar- 
barous destruction upon the most beautiful of our sacred 
buildings, and the most venerable of our ecclesiastical laws. 

It is now but too evident, that the chiefs of the Reformation, 
both clergy and lajiuen, were under the influence of the Eng- 
lish Court, and that nothiug of moment was acl«d in Scotland 
without the instigation or concurrence of her southern neigh- 
bours. Master John Knox, of stem and pitiless memory, and 
a pensioner of England, was a very powerful and prosperous 
agent in these villanics. Of considerable personal courage,' 

[■ This miut b« qoalifled. Kdot km ui Mb lad vlgoroiu el<-r>c*I bally, uf lb* 
Seoleh Mamp of hii lime. Bat he wu never ferocloiulj iiuolont where bo «u 
not mte ; kud look vary good care la be out of the w»j when in diuiger of martyr- 
dom for marder. His uge motto mM, — " dook *nd Ut the jiw ft* bye ;" which 
may be inlorpreled, aloop and let the ilorm paM. If ha did not uie tlie eaiirrMioci, 
be •clad op lt> Ihe phUowphy. He ha* foDod a mcnl able and teilou* bingnphn- 



188 MLMORIiLS OF THE 

of a haugbty yet pliant spirit, lie was endowed with taleoM 
which, though neither brilliant nor profound, were admirably 
adapted to forward the aims of his ambition. He taught his 
disciples that doctrine so captivating to tlie vulgar, that God 
is more properly worshipped in a cow-house than in a 
cathedral. He persuaded them to demolish the polluted 
temples, shouting out, like Cant in later times, — " pull down, 
pull down antichrist's nest." He insinuated that the most 
bloody vengeance upon Prelates was meritorious ; esteeming 
the lawless murder of the Cardinal Archbishop of St Andrews 
Bd excellent a jest, that he could not refrain from being 
facetious upon it in his history : " Now," says this humane 
historiau, "because the weather was hot, for it was in May- 
as ye have heard, and his funeral could not suddenly be pre- 
pared, it was thought best (to keep him from stinking), to 
give him salt enough, a cope of lead, and a nook in the bottom 
of the sea tower, a place where many of God's children had 
been imprisoned before, to await what exequies his brethren 
the Bishops would prepare for him. These things we writ© 
merrily ; but we would that the reader should obseire God's 
just judgments," &c,, &c. And he taught, both by precept 
and example, that all respect of temporal dignities is unbe- 
coming the superiority of a Calvinistic reformer. This man 
had the supreme satisfaction of beholding, long previous to his 
death, his elTorts crowned witii the most complete euccess ; and 
of being empowered to treat those whom birth, and every natu- 
ral advantage, had formed his superiors, with that brutal rude- 
ness which low minds, in all stations, are so forward to assume. 
Before his insolence, Queen Mary forgot her dignity in a 
shower of tears, and her husband. Lord Daruly, seated in the 



I 





I, whs did hlB beat 

, tliough a U»k«, 


truculent feUow it the blood of. 


ID enemy w»th* 


iquestiaD.hadmuu 


.»™i.Ue,u«lilie» 


(DBTer Buffered b; hica to in 


terfere wilh his 


. public unbitiou] 






an, and Mtaining 


;l>ieotjwU. Scotch clerical potilio 


bavti nised him to & sort of oorminteD thro 


□e in that eountrj'. 




to diBpnte, luid only a. »ct «n 


] iDcliacd to »oi 


rshi]]. itinremai 


'kablu that one of 






poel of tier peoph 


1, and of hor fonn 


of ChriMiwiity, diouid h.v« ™ 


enrclud John Km 


nx with Bupreme r 


OQtcmpl :- 


" OrtliodoJ!, 









VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 



189 



^^ fat 

I 



royal chair within the High Church of Edinburgh, was com- 
pellod to endure from the pulpit this strange address : — " Have 
you, for the pleasuro of that dainty dame (the Queen) cast 
the psahn hook in the fire ? The Lord shall strike both head 
and tttiL" And so, at a more recent period, following that 
bright example, one Mr Murray, a minister of Knox's per- 
suasion, when fastening a couple together in maniage, termed 
the man the head, and the woman the tail : " In the name of 
God, then," says he, " I join bead and tail together ; Sirs, let 
no man ever separate thera." 

It appears that John Knox added to tlie energy of hie dic- 
tion an uncommon vehemence of voice and gesture. " Mr 
Knox," says the Rev. James Melville in his MS, diary, " being 
in St Andrews, was very weak : I saw him every day of his 
doctrine go hooHe and fair, with a furring of martickg about 
his neck, a staff in one hand, and good godly Richard Ballan- 
den. his servant, holding up the oxter, from tJie Abbey to the 
parish kirk, and by the said Richard and another servant 
lifted up to the pulpit, where he bihoved to lean at his first 
entry ; but, ere he had done with his sermon, he was so active 
and vigorous that he was like to ding the pulpit in hlada, and 
flee out of it." 

John greatly exercised his vigour and activity in invectives 
against courtly dancing, skipping, and dallying with dames. 
Yet he could wink at and overlook " the rest that thereof fol- 
lows," to use his own expression, in a good hater of the Baby- 
lonish courtezan. The Earl of Morton contrived to retain at 
the same time his leman Janet Sharp, and his friend John 
Knox. Janet meddled not in kirk matters, nor got drunk 
with the blood of the saints ; therefore John would not disturb 
her calling, nor, perhaps, restrain her from the refreshment of 
a little " waik ale." Although, in his writings and dincourees, 
he would have had the world believe that he despisfd heredi- 
tary rank, noble alliances, and all the glittering paraplicmalia 
incident to that same, yet, in this, he as much played the 
hypocrite as in bis pretj?nces to disinterested piety. 

This venerable patriarch may very properly be termed the 
father of Presbyterianism in Scotland, and his discipIoB trod, 
with the most Bcrtipnl'iiis fidelity, in his footsteps; so thai 



^ 



190 MEMORIALS OF THE 

King James could not prevail with them to petition Hearren ' 
even for the safety of his mother's houI, when the body of that 
unfortunate princess was about to endure the last extreme of 
a rivai's fury. Having appointed a day of solemn fasting and 
prayer, the King commanded Mr Patrick Adamson, Arch- 
bishop of St Andrews, to officiate in St Giles's ; but the minis- 
ters perched up iTi the pulpit a young fellow, one John Couper, 
who, when the King exclaimed, " Master John, that place 
was designed for another, yet, since you are there, do your 
duty, and obey the charge to pray for my mother," replied. 
" that he would speak no otherwise than as the Spirit should 
direct him;" and, beginning to pray in his own manner, with 
abundance of bitter epithets and scriptural nicknames upon 
the poor Queen, the King's Majesty commanded him to stop ; 
whereupon he gave a knock upon the pulpit, using an ex- 
clamation in these terms, " This day shall bear witness against 
you in the day of the Lord, woe he to thee, Edinburgh t for 
the last of thy plagues shall be the worst ;" after having uttered 
these words, he passed down from the pulpit, and, together 
with the whole wives in the kirk, removed from the same. 
Immediately the Bishop of St Andrews went up to the pulpit, 
and preached a sermon concerning praying for princes, whereby 
he convinced the whole people who remained in tlie kirk, that 
the desire of the King's Majesty to pray for his mother was 
most honourable and reasonable. 

But the priests went yet further in their insolence, if pos- 
sible. They not only ransacked both Old and New Testaments 
for the names of the most flagitious persona, which they libe- 
rally bestowed from their pulpits upon the King, and to his 
very face, but when James had desired the Magistrates of 
Edinburgh to feast the French Ambassadors previous to their 
departure from Scotland, the ministers proclaimed a fast to be 
observed on the same day. His favourites, however inoffen- 
sive, were sure to incur the deepest detestation of the clergy, 
who would not suffer even the mild and peaceful Duke of 
Lennox to remain near his doting master, but drove him, 
broken-hearted, into exile. The holy sceptics pretended not 
to believe in the existence of Cowrie's foolish conspiracy, or 
the possibility of a like danger from any other quarter; and. 




nSCOUNT OP DDNDEE. 



I 






191 



in fine, took every measure which the most fertile spirit of 
implacnhility could suggest, to render hia crown irksome, and 
his sceptre useless. 

Amid all his affronts and disturbances, the King contrived 
to preserve a few of these nominal bishops from the hatred of 
the Preshyterians, who panted after the annihilation of their 
very titles. On the overthrow of the Catholic religion, Knox 
had fallen upon the device of electing a few church rulers, 
termed Superintenden/s, who should in some measure possess 
the authority of the Popish bishops, — their temporal dignities 
8tiU being suffered to remain ^Tth them ; and the Regent Mor- 
ton, and other rulers, had thought fit to bestow these Episco- 
pal titles and privileges on their retainers, aa they became 
vacant, though not without many murmurs from the Calvinistg. 
Now, amid a world of intrigue and troubles, James so far con- 
qaered his opponents as to procure an act, authorizing Epis- 
copal government in the Church, from the General Assembly, 
which met at Glasgow on the 8th of June 1610, and this was 
afterwards ratified by the Parliament of the year 1612. Still 
it was but the confirmation of the shadow of Episcopacy ; for, 
by the act, it was expressly provided, that the bishops, in all 
things concerning their life, conversation, office, and hcneEce, 
should be entirely subject to the censure aud mandates of the 
all potent General Assembly. 

James having effected this change in the government, also 
contrived to alter and reform the discipline of the Church- 
In the same year he erected the High Commission Court, the 
members of which were the whole body of prelates, all the 
commissaries in Scotland, with many peers, gentlemen, and 
BOodry of the ministers. These were enabled to decide in 
k11 causes touching religion or morals, both in clergy and 
laics, with the power of suspension, deprivation, imprison- 
ment, fining, banishment, and the infliction of sundry other 
pains and penalties, without any form or process of common 
law. This court, it may easily be supposed, was much cried 
out against by the fanatics, as putting the civil sword into the 
hands of clergymen, and the spiritual crosier into those of the 
laity, while it increased the power of the Bishops, and gave 
inordinate strength to the King's supremacy. 



192 UIJHORIALS OF THE 

111 spito of these murmurs, not long afterwards an alteration 
in the form of divine worship also took place. By the As- 
sembly convened at Perth in the year 1618, the celehratcd 
Five Articles, commonly called the Articles of Perth, were en- 
joined. These were, private communion to the sick, private 
haptiBm, kneeling at the sacrament of the Lord's Supper, con- 
firmation by the hands of Bishops, and the observation of the 
principal holidays. Though at last ratified by act of Parlia- 
ment, 1621, they met with extreme opposition. For the 
fanatical spirit was daily gaining ground, while the fear of 
sustaining loss by annexations agitated and excited snch 
noblemen, and others, as had been enriched through church 
possessions, with a wonderful access of devotion. Nay, so 
unnatural, and horrible, according to such, were these inno- 
vations, that the very elemeTits testified an abhorrence of 
them. In this black£ari*sment, as it was termed, the vote 
which confir_nietKfiirde8ign of (he Assembly, was accom^aaififl""^ 

darkness, thunder, lightning, and all ojber terrors h 
of the most tremendous tempest. ^M 

Charles the First, attempting to complete the plans of his ^^^ 
father, in an ill-advised moment imposed the Service Book ' 
upon the Scottish Church. For these were times of deep 
speculation in both countries, when not only the higher order 
but persons deemed the very refuse of society " would tfd 
upon them the mystery of things, as if they were God's spj 
Butler tells, that, a little afterwards, — 

" The oyster women lock'd their fish op, 
And Irudg'd away to cry ' no Bbhop ;' 
The mouse-trap man Inid eave-alls by. 
And 'gauiBt ill coupxcllora did cry : 
BotcberB left old clotbes in tbe lurch. 
And fell to turn and patch the Church 
Some cried the Covuimnl, instead 
Of puddings, pies, and gingerbreiid : 
And lome, for brooms, old boots, and shoes. 
Bawl'd out, to purge the Commo 
Instead of kitchen stuff, some cry 
A gospel preaching ministry • 

And some, for old suits, coats, ani 

' No surplices, nor Service Book." 




VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 193 

On Sunday the 23(1 of July 1CS7, the Ueaii of Edinburgli 
Iiad Bcarcely begun to read the jirescribed form of prayer to 
ihe congregation a^sonibleil in tlie Clmrcli of St Giles, when 
Margaret Geddes, replete with holy zeal, which her preceding 
Ralibatb'a rebuke for fornication had doubtless much indatned, 
exclairaing, " Out fauee \ovrn, wilt thou say the Mass at my 
lug ?"— discharged the stool on which she was sitting, at his 
head. This pious woman is<sometimes named Janet, as iu a 
rude ballad, apparently composed to celebrate lier achieve- 
ment, beginuing, " Put the gown upon the Bishop," — and 
published in Johnson's Musical Museum. From the continua- 
tion of Baker's Chronicle we learn that she survived the 
> Restoration.' The tumult began in what is called the Mid 
Kirk of St Giles, the East Kirk being then pivparing for au 
altar, and other things which the Lutheran worship requires. 
From this impetuous TruUa Ihe mob took the signal of uitroar, 
and, aided by the liigher malecontents, proceeded from one 
gradation of outrage to another, till they brought their King 
to the block, tlieir country to the verge of destruction, and 
their national character under stigmas Jrofn which it will 
never perfectly rrrnrrr — ~~ ~ " -^^^^^ -^ 



It is needless here to enlarge upon all thpe shifting st'eites 
uf complicated treachery and violence, thpse shameful bur- 
guins for human and royal blood. What^er the character uf 
Charles ihe First may really liave been, Ac Scots at least can 

■ [Pmm ■ VFi morr unqiicniioniible coum mo ba<e »n« u«>rtaia«J IhM thu \ 
celebntrd moilier nf (ho Sooleli CotpQknt not only nirviTed Ihe RastorktlflD. but 
klM her oaTcnanMnic prindplpi, haring.on the tdnnt of Owrlea II. publicly kbili- 
filled lior apustolic itiwl, uid bunit il, wan pitHito. A (kllln; alf from lh« Core- 
nont of iu ai'igiiul nipportcr* wxs no! m uncomnion u the lialcnt dcnum^utioni 
of Montrau'a " trraeberj" and " IreMon," would «»m to imply. In * tery mre 
pamphlet, printed in Edinborgh lG6l,HitlttDd, ■• Edinburgh'* Joy for hi« MijeMie'a 
ConHution in Englsud," which minutely reeorda llie dntalU of the popuUr rejoic- 
ing, Saint (iedda* i> thai gnphleally reoorded : — ' Uut aniangsl all our hamtadott, 
and fa/rien, that nf the immartkl Jaiiil Otddit, PHdmh nf tlie Tronf AJmlmnrt, 
WW moit pli:«aanl : Pnr kb« wna not (inly content to inrmhte alt Imt fnv/i, LttttU, 
cnr/ria, ftrvu, and •ithcr iu);redienlii that rompmied the abap of her mlladi, 
raditka, furni/'), carrali, ipiiiaaft, atbioft, witli all othsr aert of pot mtrdiaiuU** 
that belong! to Ihe gKTdaii, bnt avon her dutir of tUU, where ihc used lo dl^ienaa 
juilica Id Ihe reat of her UfgtaU MMrUt, wen all rcry orderly burnt, alie lirrtelf 
eounlenaneins tlw actiim with ■ l>t|li Hewn eLtnl a, 



i. 



1:1 



194 MEMOIUALS Of THE 

derive no advantage from ils depravity. Tnickiug for the 
life of a woll' or of a lamb, in the mariQer these villains did, 
muBt be equally infamous aiid detestaWe. But we may here 
be permitted to obGer\'e, how widely of late times it hath be- 
come fashionable, to rank King Charles among tyrants, and 
wicked men, and his destroyers with the meritoriouB and the 
pure. Modern historiane have proceeded all lengths to prove 
his ambition of arbitrary sway, his faithless system of poli- 
tics, — and if they cannot contrive to fix actual vice upon his 
private character, w'ould fain represent bim as a man of man- 
ners so extremely forbidding, that, in this age of urbanity, his 
deportment amounts almost to a crime. It would be ridlcu- 
ioUB to desire such persons to appeal to their own hearts, 
whether, in a ease like his, when prerogative extended beyond 
definition, and bad been stretched to all extremes by his pre- 
decessors, the Kings and Queens of England, they themselves 
could, with perfect tt-mper, have endured sudden and violent 
curtailments, seemingly arising from quarters entitled to no 
rational consideration or respect. Though Pryune and hie 
disciples, who atoned for their libels with their cars, might 
perhaps in one sense have boon made to feel, the modem 
authors of these boundless calumnies against the character of 
Charles, secure in the honours of their skuU, with no heredi- 
tary prerogatives, measurable or immeasurable, to lose, are 
not competent judges of his patrician agonies. But let them 
seriously consider, what cometh near to themselves, his ex- 
ceeding temptations to equivocate and juggle, environed as he 
was with a crew of the falsest hypocrites that ever existed. 
Not, however, that it does by any means plainly appear, after 
all the fine writing and evil argument on the subject, that 
Charles did actually condescend to parry the stillettos of his 
foes with a pyne doublet. And as for his cold repulsive 
demeanour, for a person of that alleged unhappy address, he 
certainly could boast of the warmest and most constant friends 
that ever man possessed. 

[How false is History on the subject of this Monarch's 
character and conduct I A faultless Sovereign, a perfect 
King, he was not. Was such ever found on earth ? When 
mankind is perfect so ^-ill be kings. But wan CharlcN the 



I 



VISCODNT OF DUNDEE. 



195 



First reall; a wilful oppressor, amid religiously and patrioti- 
cally disposed chiefs of Stotlaud ? Must we indeed concede 
to the crazy chroniclers of the Covenant, or to modem whig 
historians, no less violent and unreasonable, that he waa 
worthy of the death he died, and that England should proudly 
cherish the memory of his self-seeking murderer ? And can 
we discover, in the miserable mists of faction that aurrounded 
his throne from the first moment of his reign, and the aban- 
doned treachery and deceit, in the highest of his subjects, that 
dogged his person through life, no explanation of, no excuse 
for, the worst steps of his policy in the government of his 
realms ? Let us turn from modern histories to the private 
unpublished thoughts of an honest nobleman, and upright 
counsellor, who had been intimate with Charles the First, 
from tliat Monarch's childhood, 

" King James being dead, and his eon King Charles suc- 
ceeding to him in his kingdom, and to his virtues too, — 
although with some want of experience, which is only got 
with time, — all the turbulent and discontented humours of the 
former time were up, as is usual in these great transitionB, 
and plied his Majesty incessantly uith aecuBations, personal 
assertions, new projects, and informations of abuses. And 
truly there wanted not matter, and their endeavours had de- 
8er\'cd praise, if spleen to the persona of men, and their own 
private interest, had not given life and motion to tlieir pro- 
ceedings, rather than the serviire of the King and tlie good of 
the State. Then was there nothing hat /actions, and factious 
consultations, of the one, to hold tliat place and power they 
possessed before, — of the other, to wrest it out of their hands, 
and to invest themselves ; and no dreara or phantasy of inno- 
vation came in any body's heoiJ, but presently he durst vent 
it to the King ; aod still the most ignorant were boldest. 
Ncitlier wanted there some honest and nise men who gave 
their advice out of mere affection to his Majesty and the 
public ; but wanting that bold forwardness, and factioua assis- 
tance, which the other ha*! in prosecuting of their private 
ends, no great hold waa taken of thom."' 

Charles, not yet crowned King of Scotland, received sundry 

' (M.S. of AfHiiLnIJ flrti I,nH N«pier.-.Vi| r*< ck.,rUr-d,M] 




Idfl JieMOm.MS OF THE 

mysterious hints, that, if he ilid not conduct himself in a man- 
ner that seemed fully to recognize the Independency of bis 
ancient kingdom, the crown might be bestowed somewhere 
else ; and most anxious he was to avoid the imputation of in- 
tending to " reduce Scotland to a province." Thus the affairs 
of that country became to him a separate burden of a difficult 
and irksome nature. For his privy-council of England were 
not suffered to be cognisant of the affaire of the other kingdom, 
which the King mnnaged, through the reports of his privy- 
council there, with the aid (if aid it could be called) of bin 
Scotch favourites, or such of the council as he mimmoned from 
Scotland for special consiTltation. Indeed, at this time there 
appeared to be no connexion or sympathy between the king- 
doms. The English nation, we are informed by Clarendon, 
knew and cared less about Scotland than they did about 
Poland or Germany ; — " no man ever inquired what was doing 
in Scotland, nor had that kingdom a place or mention in one 
page of any Gazetto," But it was not the privilege of Charles 
to be able to forget his ancient independent kingdom ; and 
certainly his attention to the affairs of Scotland was kept alive 
in a manner most disagreeable to himself, and most discredi- 
table to his native country. Lord Napier, a Privy-councillor, 
and Treasurer-Depute, (under the Earl of Mar, who held tlie 
white staff,) also mentions, in those valuable reflections on the 
times which he left in manuscript, that Mar, was not free from 
that storm of faction, the great object of which was to wrest 
place and power from each other, " but was charged home by 
his enemies with some abuses, in the King's presence, which 
they were not well able U\ make appear ; therefore, there was 
a gentleman directed to me, desiring me to give them intelli- 
gence upon what points my Lord might be charged ; with 
assurance from them that it should never be known ; and before 
I should declare any thing in that kind, I should have assur- 
ance, from the King's own mouth, and my Lord of Bucking- 
ham, of the white slaff ! This I flatly refused, as an office 
unworthy of a gentleman, and told him that I disdained any 
honour that should he acquired by so dishonourable means 
against a man that was in terms of outward friendship with me, 
although I knew he bad no friendly intentions towards me." 



VISCOL'NT OF DUNDEE. 197 

Aud Uiia iiublemau's sumining up, of the uncunquerahle diffi- 
culties which beset the path of the King in the hopeless at- 
teiopt to rule Scotland well and wisely, might inJeed cause even 
& whig historian to revise his presuming auathcma&. " ThiH 
preceding Relation," Lord Napier says, " being written la 
haste, and imperfect, many passages being omitted, for bre- 
rity's sake, which might have shown the iniquity of these 
times,' is nevertlieless most true. And thereby the judicious 
may perceive the former settled manner of govfirnment shaken 
by frequent innovations entertained and [iractised ; factions in 
Court and state a-foot ; accusations, calumnies, and aspersions 
ordinary ; and, which was worse, combinatioTis, and hi^ies 
given thereby of great service to the King, without any per- 
formance, but, by the contrary, his Majesty's just and graciouB 
inclination abused by misinformations, his ears blocked up and 
60 straightly beleagured that truth could not approach them, — 
and alt for their own profit, and prejudice of the King and 
State, — the presence of honest men, who could rot comply 
with them in their oblique courses, so hateful that they could 
not endure it ; and so bolJ, in consideration of the strength of 
their leagues, that they do not stick to/aiat/tf the King's hand, 
BUrreptitiously to steal his Maj'txti/e sfipvrscriptiowi, and to 
frame letters contrary to his meuntTUf, and many oUurr things 
of this kind."' " Anil truly, if over any King, our Sovereign, 
in BO far as concerneth Scottish businoss, may justly make 
Dioclestau'e complaint, — CoUiffunt at qaatuor out quinque circa 
ImperaloreTn, atque aibi afilia, sub prrtcxtu boni pubUci et 
principis, propoaunt, — bonoa, ei virtute pneditos, ab Imperaiore 
amovenl. — inahti. fnclioaos et aibi tiltmeos adsciHcnnt, — verila- 



' [Thne omlHiona ara much Is be rrgnlei. Had ihp Rclktion of Lord Naplar 
eoidprahcndwl all the hUtflrj' of ** tba iDlijuilj' of thMa limN," and had he aluo ex- 
pxwd the iniquity at (be Mnie* immedlalcl}' >u«veding tlie period of hU ReUtioo, 
(m, indwd, we are inronned by Wiaharl, Ihal he had ■nuallj' inlended, ins** moat 
clabontc ditoouno of ihe ortglu ol the turmultii in (!i'»( Dritalu,") such » hiator^ 
wDuld tu>** been a moM talualjle aibliliun to lliat uf CUi'rndiiii, wha wu but ill in- 
funned io KcMcb alEura.] 

■ [Sir Pliilip Warwicii (p. 1 46,) ■!» alludva to Ihiit nwlhod iit deceirinB lb* 
Kiof. daring tha (■urrMpondcDoa balwiit hia llajwlj' and tlw Marqoi* of Hamil- 
■un, wlieii Willi hia fle«t in ih* rrith of Forth, in IrtSB.) 




198 UKMOKIALS OF THE ^^H 

tern ad auTfs prirtviput appdlcre non sinvnt, — Sit bostjS, 

SAPIEKS, CAUT03, DECIPITUR IMPERATOR."'] 

A modem historian [Malcolm Laing], whose virulence 
against the House of Stewart is bu personal oud fresh, that we 
could almost suppose him to be one of Charles's murderers 
condemned to the fate of the wandering Jew, talks of the 
King's " insolence," hocausc, while in Scotland in the year 1633, 
he avoided on hia way to Falkland a rabble of Fife Lairds 
whom Lord Bothes, a well known puritan, had collected to 
wait upon him ; and refused permission to a magistrate to 
kiss his hand because he was a presbyterian. Surely insolence 
is a very Iiarsh term when applied to such conduct in a 
monarch ? To act in that manner might have been insolence 
ill Mr Malcolm Luing, or even in Mr Charles Fox ; but un- 
prejudiced people might esteem it a proper sense of dignity in 
King Charles Stewart.' This expression, indeed, is very con- 

■ [These lut words kk written emphatically large ia tfae maDascript. ll ia a 
ipeech put iu the muuth of the Emperar Dioclelian, after liis roluntary abdicaiicm 
of the {liroDB, when declaiming on hi> favourite topic, the difficulty of being a good 
prince. Gibbon thus paraphraBcs the passage. " Hon often is it the interat of 
Tour or five minislefi (o combine rogeibor to d«c^ve ihoir Sovereign 1 Sectnded 
^ni Diankind by his exalted dignil/, the truth ia conpeoled from Lis knovrledge,— 
he con see only with their eyes, he heitrs nothing but their misrcpresentatioOB. M« 
UDufers (he most imporlont oBicDB upon vice and weakneaa, and diagrocea tbe moil 
rirtuoua and deserving among hia eubjecta. By such inrunoui aria the beat and 
wiaeat princes are sold to the venal corrupliDnB o! their courtiers." The quatation 
in Lord Nspier'a roanuacript ia from Vopitcut, a learned Sjracusan, reckoned tb« 
Corypliieus among the sis authora, called liiitoria jJujuiftB iSfTi;>I<.ri!i.] 

< [Ckrcodon kuevi mure of (his matter than the pretentJaua Lung. The great 
conlcmporary histarian infomia uc, that in his coronation progreaa lo Scotland in 
1633, Giarles bad it forced upon hia obacrvaliou, tliat at thia time Rothes and bi> 
clique endeavoured " lo make theineelvcs popular hy speaking in Parliament agiinat 
Ihoae thinga which were most grateful to hia Majesty, and which still paeaed not- 
vfilhatonding their contradiction, and he thought a little discounteuaiice upon Iboae 
persons would either suppreaa that spirit within Ihemsclvco, or make the piHson of 
it leas operative upon othere." Clarendon adds, that, of the Eurl of Rulhes, and 
others, tho King had the wont opinion, and purposely withheld from tl 



grace by m 



' apeaking to them, u 



» of them 



le Court. Yet such 



leiy, and dclermiDation to attain their enda, that " when the King 



was abroad in the fields, or passing tAruu^A vUla^, when tho greatest crowds of 
people flocked lo see him, Ihott mtn icould ttill be not Aim, and entertain him witli 
some diaooarae and plea<nnt relations, which the King's gentle disposition could not 
avoid, and which mode tliosa peraoua lo be genenilly behoved to be moat acceptable 



^^^^H^^B VISCOUNT UF DUNDEE. 199 ^H 

^^V vuuaiit witti iLe pliraseolugy of tlie wliule work, during a peni- ^^M 

^^H eaJ of whicL one is tempted every minute to oxclaim mth ^^| 

^^H miiie boetesa, " b; my troth Captain Pistol, these be very bit- ^^M 

^^^M ter worda." But we may use towards Mr Laing the words of ^^| 

^^H the " Likdie Abbasse," in Sir David Lindsay's play of the Three ^^M 

^^H Estates — ^^H 

^^^1 " FaU humon carle, Ihou urt ovir MTOganI, ^^^| 

^^^1 To juge ihc doidU of sio «iie holie aBQCt." ^^^| 

^^^1 Bul, after all, the cavils of liis foes signify little. The siftinga ^^H 

^^^B and sophistications of whiggism cauuot overturn the esta- ^^H 

^^H tlishcd records of truth. As long as moderation and good ^^M 

^^^M sense are prized, or literature and a turn for the floe arts ad- ^^H 

^^H mired, while constancy under the most bitter and unmerited ^^M 

^^^M misfortunes is respected, or piety enduring to the very last ^^H 

^^H esteemed a virtue, this good prince must continue to bo re- ^^M 

^^1 vered, in spite of those hii^torians who disguise the Stewarts in ^^M 

^^B the imperial purple of Home, that like Brutus they may boast ^^M 

^^H of having assassinated tyrants ; and through the bosom of ^^H 

^^H King Charles the Martyr, and his descendants, aim a blow at ^^M 

^^B the heart of royalty, and all hereditary honour. ^^| 

^^H Sir Philip Warwick pronounces a very affectionate and ^^M 

^^M touching culogium on King Charles at the conclusion of his ^^M 

^^H contemporary memoirs. " I shall conclude," he snys, " with ^^M 

^^^M Id hia Utjimty," — ■ chwscterutic demoiuioir uf ambitioiu dtmoency, upon which ^^^| 

^^^1 (ha hiatoriaa ptnea tliia slirowd roflecCioD, ihkl, " let (he )iroo<l«iit or noal fomul ^^^| 

^^^1 nun resolve to beep wh>t duluiee lio will la*ai-d> o^cn, a I/U4 and conJuUnt ndit ^^^| 

^^^1 insluitly demilltlMS tbil wWo mikchine, knd gets nilliin him, an J even obligea hiiD ^^^| 

^^H The Muae uteaa nuduily, in qiurtcn where it might have been kaat fipKted, ^^^| 

I we And comnHoted upon in Lord Napier's manmeripta, an one of itw eourcc* of ^^^| 

Ihcne BiTon uf tUe unliappj' King which have been siaggernlcd into orlmeii. ^^^| 

Napier adda thi< quaint illuatratiun : ■■ Much like thai gcnllenuiD who nxk uul, la ^^^| 

the oompaaj' of ethera, la bring in (he I'epe to % city in Italy. The f opa aakng ^^^ 
man; qoaetiaoa, uid eaqairinK (he namea of eitiea, riTcra, and placea, (bat cama 
withia hia view aa be went along, llila gcaitlenun made aii<i«rcni lu alt, and gave 
name* to every thing, but acnr a Irut uiu, being himiwlf Ignuraiil <J thn Mitie. 
AnA ao he conUaacd in dinenune with ilin Pupe till lie Mine to bia hidging ; and 
whan a friend of hia rebuked him for abualng hia HelinMS with aaCnHAa,— ' if, 
(uid hr) I had ateurd ifpiorant of whnt waa aaked, the Tope would have «>lled 

I another l i-i, almuhl 1 forego the honour I had, to ba aeen » ■«»■ the Pupa, and In ^^ 

^^B apHoU Hith hitn I An>l he re«t« aa wall aatiaflad aa if the truth had bpcn eaactlj ^^H 

L J 



i MKMURIAI,S OF THE 

this, if it be lawful to compare small tliiugB with great, — faia 
pasaion, or manner of death, most resembleB that of hb great 
Master ; for. Hko him he was a King, and a King of that 
people that persecuted him to Iur death : he was a King that 
resembled Seneca's refined rational man ; one that forfeited 
with the vulgar, or the many miataken and deceived narrow 
minds, the repute of l>eing a good man, that he might not 
lose to himself the conscience of being truly such an one ; 
For his principles answered to true and solid reason, and 
suited with di^^ne ordinances ; and' therefore he was, as in 
his history appears, owned by the persons of the best quality, 
and of most knowledge, in his kingdom, even when he was so 
far from being able to reward, that he was not able to protect 
either himself or them : and, indeed, his condition was often 
GO low and despicable, that, as Codomannus said unto his loyal 
adherents, so he might have said to his, — ' Yon that never for- 
sook me, though I have been twice overcome, and twice forced 
to fly, have been the best evidence to my mind that I remained 
King, and that misfortune could not dethrone me ; so aa God, 
not myself reward you.' Providence made him glorious : 
Great and good minds will honour hira : Ignorant, not discern 
him: Politick, who think a kingdom should never be lost 
upon scruples, not value him : But God, I am assured, hath 
pardoned his failures, and crowned him for his piety and his 
Bufferings," 

The Marquis of Montrose, too, at the close of his own mia- 
fortuues, thus from the scaSold spoke of his royal master : — 
" For the late King he lived a saint, and died a martyr : I 
pray (3od tbat'I may so end as he did : If ever I should wish 
my soul in another man's stead, it should be in his," 

After the Presbyterian zealots had disposed of Charles the 
First, Cromwell very soon became their detestation, because 
he was auwilhug to establisli their Ecclesiastical Code in 
England, and entertained no great respect for their Solemn 
League and Covenant.' But they had gone tt\o far to be 

> [It exoilod liiB most supreme coDlempt, aod wu Tiuled with hia aeverett taata. 
Cnmwell wu the Rnt Id huig > PmbyterUn clei'gfnua ; and he actuKllj' drum- 
med the Geoeral AsHmbly in a body, from their own tmll, snd with Iheir Modera- 
tor M their ho«d, ool of Edinburgh.] 



L 



VISCOUNT OF D0NDEE. 201 

capable of making any effectual resistance against the real 
tyrant, and therefore resolved to summon King Charles the 
Second from Flanders, and crown him King of Scotland, aa the 
least of two evils ; hoping, through the craft of tho Marquis of 
Argyle, their own strength, and the Prince's weakness, to 
possess, for some time at least, that supremacy over their 
Sovereign which was so dear to their hearts. The Prince 
arrived, was crowned at Scone, and regaled with the same or 
even worse treatment than his predecessor had endured at 
their hands. The subscription of the Solemn League, indeed, 
might appear but a trifle to a person of his disposition, and 
perhaps the public abuse lavished upon his parents gave him 
very little mieasiness. But the continual fastings and prayers ; 
the tedious sermons twice and sometimes thrice a-day ; the 
unceremonious dismissions of all the friends who had con- 
tinued faithful to his father and himself ; the disgusting man- 
ners of the clergy, and of the Presbyterians in general, joined 
with the constant society of his family's very worst enemies, 
were intolerable. How could such a situation be endured P 
Besides, this merry and amorous Monarch was precluded from 
laughter on the Sabbath, and from love every day of the 
week. 

Not, in truth, that the ruling elder, Argyle, was at all aver8« 
to the King's inflammability, would the blaze have irradiated 
his own mansion, and refined the mass of his posterity. He 
had laid a plan for placing a crown upon the head of his eldest 
daughter, the Lady Anne Campbell, and for some time Charles 
found it convenient to humour his presumption. But the good 
fortune of the Marquis was then upon the decline, nothing but 
disappointment ensued ; and the [Kmr young Lady, who ap- 
pears to have had a tang of her father's nmhition, supplied the 
want of a regal diadem with a garland of straw. Unable to 
bear the frustration of her hopes, she died in a state of di»- 
traction.' 

' [Kirkloa, Mirel}' nut inimical to Argyll, lalls th* uluuitetcruilie dory in tann* 
Dot irpr)' ooinpliiueiiOry to his hero. ■ Tlir MBr4iUB of Argvla being ktl that time 
■Iraoel dicUlor of ScnUuiil, to nuke all nire/ur AitM*!/', being in greit duigfr from 
dtt nry o/ kimifmUi, liioughi good to>trik« up ■ matrh between (be King and hti 
daughter L«dy Aon ; to wbidi the King conaenlad with all aHonuoe ; though all 
that poor famUy had by the bargain waa a diaappointawDt eo gritvoua to the r 



Laos 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



The King's slavery, from his very first appearance iu Scot- 
land, was almost incredible. No " Malignante," nor " Enga- 
gers" of quality, were suffered to approach him. Great offence 
was given to the godly by his lodging one night at Dunotter 
Castle, belonging to the Marischal family, though with per- 
mission of Arthur Erskinc, brother 1o the Earl of Mar, and uncle 
to the young Earl of Marischal, an " Engager," whom he would 
not suffer to receive or wait upon the King, farther than the 
(iastle gate. The Duke of Hamilton, tlie Earls of Lauderdale 
and Camwath, with many more of his real or supposed friends, 
were driven from his presence, while Lord Dunfermline, and 
Lord Crawford, were compelled to perform public penance, 
for their loyal hackslidings, in the face of the kirk. The for- 
mer, being Argyle's creature, was allowed his own pew at 
Dunfermline, but the latter, Duke Hamilton's brother-in-law, 
clothed in sackcloth, occupied the stool of repentance in the 
High Church of Edinburgh. The only one of Charles's fol- 
lowers allowed to remain near him, was the Duke of Bucking- 
ham, who, by betrajdng the King's secrets, aud exerting those 
wonderful talents which afterwards gained the rich heiress of 
Fairfax from her puritanical old father, ingratiated himself so 
much with Argyle and the clergy that he maintained his 

young LKdy, tlml, of & galtaat }'oaog gentlenromMi, the lost her Bpirit luil turned 
sbsolutel]' ditlnwied : to uufartiuutcl^ da Uie back ttktda of pritaU dtttgrt work 
ia Ihe puppet pt>y> of tl>e public revolutions in tlie warld." One piliei the Lady, 
but the Marquii wu most deeervedlj' sold. It hoj Dot the first matcb -nuking 
trick of the kind that he had nttcmpted. When Hamilton wu in Sootlnnd, in 1U4S, 
expresaly eonunlnioned bvthe King to crush the rebellion, and the am bitiooi deaigna 
of Argyle, the latter Beduccd the weak and double-faced favourite even into domeetia 
eoeiality, and liad nearly eflecled a marriage betweea liU son Lord Lorn, and 
Hamilton's eldest dnugliter. Lady Ann. Tliie pregnant fact has only been disclosed 
of late yean by the pnblication of a catalogue mrionnu of the Tiinily papers of tlie 

IhooBu of Hamilton. No. 191 of the catalogue is thus described : " Gwtraet ot 
marriage betwixt the Marquis of Hamilton, on the part of ]iis eldest daughter Lady 
Ann, and llie Marquis of Argyle, on the part of liis eldest son the Lord Lorn, irken 
cAcy thoald ba of aye : The narrisge portion is an hundred thousand marks ; ths 
yearly jointure lifteen thousand marks ; and tlie penalty to him who re<iled, thirty- 
six tliDDSand marks, all remeid of law eadudcd ; \&\\-\Si%"-~MatlXa»d Clui 
MiKfllavg. A very awkward disoloaure for the character of Haraillon, consider- 
ing the state of public aflairs at that dais. Tbe marriage never look place ; but 
*B cannot give Hnmillon credit for having sold Argyle, as Charles the Second did 
■flcrwards-J 



I 
I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 208 

grouud, although his course of life was dissolute and acandalous. 
His master's licentious conduct at this period, though much 
insiBled upoD l>y the rigid of all sects, and by the Wliigs in 
particular, appears to have been exa^erated- A passage in one 
of the letters written by Mr Sharp, afterwards Archbishop of 
St. Andrews, to the Reverend Mr Douglas, proves that his behu- 
viour in all points was not so notorious as is generally believed. 
Sharp says, that while in London, finding many posseBsed 
with the belief that the King, when in Scotland, broke all 
terms and engagomenta he was under by treaty, " and was 
vicious and unclean, and a Bcoruer of ordiaanrcs, and a dis- 
countenancer of ministers, ho had detected those great lies, 
and malicious forgeries, and declared he could not say the King 
broke them, and that the honest party were well satisfied 
with him," Now this was written by a eoi-ditimU Whig, to a 
very strenuous one, who was well acquainted with ail the 
King's actions while in Scotland, and with whom Sharp would 
have entirely lost credit (a matter of great consequence to him 
then) had he ventured to affirm that which the other knew to 
be untrue. 

The Presbyterian impositions and restrictions at length be- 
came so intolerable, that Charles effected an escape to his old 
I friends the Cavaliers ; but finding their numbers much too 
small to assist him, he reluctantly returned to his cage under 
the conduct of Colonel Montgomery and Arthur Erskine, who 
had been sent in pursuit of him by the Committee. The 
battle of Worcester finally delivered him from the claws of hia 
spiritual tormentors. But the remembrance of their cruelty 
was indelibly fixed in hifi bosom. Though too easily forget- 
ting the crown of thorns they had woveu for hia father's 
temples, he ever recollected witli detestation the throne of like 
materiala on which these merciless Whigs had seated iiiraself 
at Scone, 
ba 
thi 
pr. 



The conduct of the Corjioration of Edinburgli, after the 
battle of Worcester, deserves particular notice, as it exhibits 
the adherents of the Solemn League and Covenant in a very 
disracteriBtic light. This honourable Ixidy bad been so far 
prevailed upon hy their almminalion of Cromwell, and the im- 



^ 



204 



HEMORIALS OF THE 



portunities of the loyalists, as to join the Natiouat Eug&ge- 
ment in favour of Kiiig Charles, and to advance nearly three 
tbousand three hundred pounds, instead of twelve hundred 
men they had pledged themselves to furnish. To this end 
they borrowed a sum of money, the town funds not then being 
able to advance it. But after the unfortunate battle of Wor- 
cester, they totally disclaimed the " Engagement," for which 
the money had been raised ; neither would they repay one 
farthing to those who Lad lent it. But to have their coneciences 
set entirely at ease respecting the honest ff of this measure, they 
consulted the Committee of the General Assembly, " whether 
the Engagement lieing unlawful, they were bound m COTWOwncc 
to pay the money borrowed in support of it?" And the up- 
right Committee of the Reverend Assembly declared, — " It is 
the judgment of the Commission, Ibat the Provost, Bailies, 
and Council of Edinburgh, who state the case, should not, in 
conscience, pay any part of the foresaid sum, not interpODd 
their authority for paying of the same." 

" The Rnbbina write, when anj" Jew 
Did make lo GoJ, or tnnn, a vow, 
Which afterwurdii he found untoward, 
Or stubborn to be kept, and too hard, 
Any three other Jewii o' the nation 
Might free him from the obligation." 

But Oliver's Parliament afterwards ordained satisfaction to 
be made to the creditors, who bad much reason to be thankful 
t"hat nice casuistry, in cases of conscience, did not so strongly 
pervade that Assembly, as tbe Jesuitical congregations of their 
own divines,' 



' [In a note of the 1a*t century, by the Rev. Jimca Scott, to hia IranBcripla from 
the Presbjlerj Regiiter of Perth (MS. Advocate'R Library), we find the follow- 
ing : — " When Charlc* II. waa crowned at Scone, Andrew Reid advanced, towarda 
defraying Uie DXpeDsea ot ^e CoronatiDD, forty thousand mcrbB, for wliicli the 
King gave bond. After Oliver Cromwell had taken puBaeaaian of Perth, Andrew 
Raid presented lo him the King'a bund.and craved payment. Cromwell replied :— 
' I am neither hfir nor etecMvr to Cluu'lee Stewart.' Mr Reid pmently auewered : 
—■ Then you are a eicieaa ialroniUcr.' Cromuell, turning lo one of hia ofRcem, 
■aid, ' thai aueh a buld speech had never been made lo him before,' " It may be 
neceeaary to explain, that * vicioui intromitHion,' is the legal term for amuming the 
iiiBiiagenient of properly beloncing lo anolher lillioul anlhority : xnd it render* 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 205 

On his restoration Charles resolved to re-eatablish Episcij- 
pacy in Scotland, and that in opposition to the advice of one 
of bis principal counsellors In Scottish afTairs, the Earl of Lau- 
derdale, who WHS ever a Presbyterian in his heart,' and mortally 
hated King Charles the First and his party, to the conclusion 
of his life, Charles II., who said that Presbyteriauism was 
not the religion of a gentleman,* chiefly entrusted its overthrow 
to the care of two personages, who both afterwards made a 
great figure in Scottish affairs, the Earl of Middleton, and Mr 
James Sharp. 

Middleton, the son of John Middleton of Cadham who was 
slain sitting in his chair by some of Montrose's soldiers, was 
at first but a pikeman in Colonel Hepburn's regiment in 
France, but raised himself by his gallantry to high military 
commands. In the year IC60, he was created Earl of Middle- 
ton, Lord Clermont and Fettercairn. Though at first a proscr 
lyte to the doctrine of the Puritans, in whose service he ob- 
tained the renown of a good soldier, he had come over to the 
King's party, been taken prisoner at the battle of Worcester, 
and confined in the Tower, from whence he made hia escape 
in his wife's clothes. While in confinement, Aubrey pretends 
that he had a strange visit from a ghost, which shall be re- 
lated in that author's own words : — 

" This Lord Middleton had a groat friendship with the Laird 
of Bocconi, and they had made an agreement that the first of 
them that died should appear to the other in extremity. The 
Lord Middleton was taken prisoner at Worcester fight, and 
was prisoner in the Tower of London under three locks. Lying 
in his bed pensive, Bocconi appeared to him : My Lord Mid- 
dleton asked him if he were dead or alivo ; he said, dead ; and 
t/iat he ivas a ghost, and told him, that within three days ho 

Ih* iDtrDmiltar likbl« for debts. Old Noll was > ramonclen, ruSlkB, but irJtb M 
little of nwKnnm tboiil kiln H Milton's S*Un, Doublteu he paid the bond,— out 
of Chu-lea Slewan'a purw.] 

■ [L*ad«rd>le wai nerer nnj' thing " in hi> lirart" but in nD|iriuci|ilei) hypncriM. 
Kod di>gii>ting TohipiuBrj'.] 

* (llmd Cbtrlta the Second eaid, which perliBps hs did, and in all probabitilx 
nMj mmat, thai the ooiviiaiUiii; dinclpline of PrHb^MirianiHu wa* not ihe thria- 
lian rriigioD, and thai the unirping ellqu* into whan banda he had fallen were not 
|rnllMnen, Ihe ramarli «DUld neither be eenaurpd uor cunlnitartxi. ] 



^ 



206 MEMORIALS OF THE 

ebouH escape ; and he did so in his wife's clothes. When he 
had done his message, he gave a frisk and said, — 

GiovanDi, Giovanni 'lis very strange, 

In the world to see so sudden a cbange, — 

and then gathered up and vanished. Tliis account Sir Wil- 
liam Dugdale had from the Bishop of Edinburgh ; and this 
and the former account he has writ in a book of miscellaniea, 
which I have seen, and is now deposited with other hooka of 
his in the Museum at Oxford.' 

The course of Middleton's life was marked with many won- 
ders. In his jouth a certain palmister assured him that he 
should rise to great honourB, and even to the supreme com- 
mand of hia country. But when Middleton related the story 
he never would reveal the end of the prediction, " which (says 
Kirkton) made his companions suspect it was tragical, as af- 
terwards it did indeed prove." When in the Highlands of 
Scotland, attempting to raise a party for King Charles the 
First, a second-sighted old gentleman told him that his en- 
deavours would be fruitless, that the King was Jaied to a 
violent death, that several other vain attempts in the royal 
cause would be made, hut that finally Charles the Second 
would be restored. The Whigs affirm, that when Middleton 
took the Covenant, he raised his rigljt arm, saying, that if he 
should ever do any thing against that blessed day's work, he 
wished that arm might be his death. When Governor of Tan- 
giers, he fell down stairs and broke the- bone of hia right arm, 
which pierced his side, and occasioned his death ; and they 
add, " this was the end of one of those who had brought the 
Church of Scotland on her knees to Prelacy." He was cer- 
tainly a man of considerable talents, and not destitute of litera- 
ture ; but his military manners, and the odious situation in 
which he was placed, made the Whigs regard him with pecu- 
liar bitterness of detestation, 



Mr James Sharp was the son of Mr William Sharp, Sheriff- 
Clerk of Banffshire, and certainly not the grandson of a piper, 
as the Presbyterians assert ; who add, that his musical proge- 
nitor was celebrated for playing a spring (i. p. time) called 



H^H VISCOUNT 01'' DUKDEF. 207 

Trot Cosie. James was born in the Castle of Banff, in tha 
year 1613, ami gave early proof of a superior geuins. Being 
deatineii for the Church, he was sent to the University of 
Aberdeen, where he made a rapid progress in literature, There, 
if we may believe memoir writers, a wonderful dream befell 
him, in which all the leading events of hia future life were 
plainly eignifiod, saving the barbarous scene which concluded 
it. His first step towards preferment, was a Professorship of 
Philosophy in St. Leonard's College, in the University of St. 
Andrews, obtained through the interest of Lord Eothes, to 
whom he was related by his mother, a gentlewoman of tlio 
name of Lesley. Kirkton says it was observed of her, " that all 
the time this her goodly son was in her belly, she would never 
taste liquor except only wine, — herein he was not a deliverer 
like Sampson." He also states, that Sharp was a poor scholar 
in St. Andrews at the time Spottiewoode was Archbishop, and 
before the leaguer at Dunse Law, which is not true, Aberdeen 
being the university in which he was educated. Kirkton re- 
lates his dream thus : — 

" There goes a story of him, which I have many times heard 
before his miserable death, that while he was a scholar in the 
college, lying in one bod with his comrade, one night in hit 
sleep and dream ho fell into a loud laughter, and therein con- 
tinued a pretty time, til! his bedfellow thought 6t to wake 
him, and ask him what the matter was, and why he was so 
merry ; he answered, he had been dreaming the Earl of Craw- 
ford bad made him parson of Crail, which was a great matter 
in his eyes at that time. Another night in bed nnth the same 
bedfellow, he fell asleep, and in his sleep a laughing, which 
made his comrade wonder what the matter was, for he laughed 
a great deal louder than at tlie Brst ; so his comrade thought 
fit to wake him again, with which he was verj- much offended ; 
for. paid he to his beilfcllow. I thought I was in Paradise, be- 
cause the King bad made me Archbishop of 8t. Andrews: then, 
said his comrade, I hope you will remember old friends, Af- 
t«r^^'a^ds he foil a dreaming once more, and in his dream a 
weeping, and wept most lamentably for a long time ; his com- 
rade thought ho should not be blamed any inort- for interrap- 
tions. and m sutfi-rod him to rontiniic for a long time; nt 



8 MKMOKIAI£ OF HIE 

length he awoke, and when his comraile told him he hiA 
ch&nged his tune, and asked wlial the matter was, he an- 
swered, he had been dreaming a very ead dream, and that 
wae, that he had been driving a coach to hell, and that very 
fast. What way he drove I shall not say ; hut all the country 
knew he drove most fiercely to his death that day he was 
killed ; though he chose hypatha, because of some warnings 
he had that morning where he had lodged." 

It is a sad thing to destroy the credit of Mr Kirkton's rela- 
tion ; yet one must remark, that the circumstuncee of Ilia 
dream belong peculiarly to Fife, whereas the Archhisliop cer- 
tainly studied and took his degree of master at Aberdeen. Dur- 
ing his regency there, he struck Mr Sinclair, a fellow regent 
(afterwards minister of Ormistou) a box on the ear, for giving 
him the lie in a dispute respecting cliurch government, which 
had like to have knocked his own preferment on the head ; but 
he recovered from the bad impression which that violence oc- 
casioned. About this time he had, as was afterwards pretend- 
ed, an amour with a beautiful Marifot-nes, a female hostler, 
one Isabel Lindsay, the produce of which was a child, whom 
Mr Sharp strangled with a handkerchief, and buried beneath 
a hearth-stone. This legend was invented after he became a 
Primate; and received some colour from the conduct of the 
woman, who was crazed. While the Archbishop was celebrat- 
ing divine service at St. Andrews, and the 7th verse of the 
63d Psalm, — " In God my glory placed is," — came to be read, 
the woman cries — " Your glory, your glory 1 My glory's placed 
in God !" — but kept quiet till the commeiicemi.-ut of the ser- 
mon, when she started up, calling the Primate Judas, or some 
auc.h name, when she was quickly removed to prison. These 
ravings of hers were metamorphosed into a public and solemn 
accnsation of fornication and murder, Isabel was continually 
haunted witli grief for the sad increase of witchcraft, and de- 
clared that hIig once saw Archbishop Sharp, Dr Pitullo, and 
Mr Robert Rait, minister of Dundee, all dancing in the air. 

The Primato enduied another calumny of a like nature, the 
confutation of which, in a letter to the publisher of his Me- 
moirs, may not be unamusing to the reader : — " As to that 
story in the preface (to the Prexhylerinn Tjifc of Sharp) of the 



Viscount of dUjvdee. 



209 



Primate's sister-in-law boing sent to the north with child, 1 
reckon it necessary to give you tlie following account of that 
silly, simple, scnselesB woman Kathcrine Moncxieff, daughter 
to WiUiam MoncrielT of Eanderston. A few years after the 
Resloratiou, Mr John Cunningham, the Earl of Gleucairn's bod, 
afterwards Earl of Glencaini, while a student here, took a 
fever ; and that he might be better taken care of, the Arch- 
bishop brought him to his own Iiouse. During his sickness, 
this poor unhappy woman sometimes went to his room; and 
after he recovered, and had left the place, she told some of 
the eer%'aDts that she was in that way (which she seemed very 
fond of) to Mr Cimniugham. This coming to her sister's ears 
she presently told lier husband of it, who immediately ordered 
a man and a horse to he got r«ady, and carry her to Cowper, 
where two of her sisters were living ; and never in all his life 
saw her again. After that she went to live at Crail alone, 
with a servant, and proved not to bo in that way," Subsequent- 
ly, however, she proved to be so to a miller, and satisfied for 
the offence in the church of Crail. Continuing to cohabit with 
the miller, her friends sent her to the north. 

Sharp was next constituted minister at Crail, and when the 
Scottish zciilots, making a division in Argylo's kingdom, sepa- 
rated themselves into Besoluti'oners and lieinonstrators, as they 
were called, the Resulutioners, or more moderate party, chose 
Mr Sharp as ambassador to represent their grievaoceB before 
the judgment-seat of Cromwell. He performed this mission 
so sagaciously, that Oliver, who must be esteemed a profound 
critic in matters of that kind, remarked, that he ought to be 
styled, after the Scotch fashion, Sharp of that ilk. On the 
ovo of the Restoration, 16()0, he was sent to Breda by the Ro- 
solutioncrs (then the leading Presbyterians), and General 
Monk, to learn the King's intentions towards them; and in 
London he had the management of their concerns entirely in 
his own hands; but, become weary of their ways, and ambi- 
tious of advancement, he was prevailed wiUi to forward the re- 
esttthlishmcDt of Episcopacy. During his absence from Scot- 
land, ho had been clioscn Professor of Divinity in St. Mary's 
(Toliegc, St Andrews, and now the King made him his cliaplain 
for Scotland, with a [lension of i'200. Up afterwards obtained 
14 



210 



MEMORIAIS OF THB 



the ArchbisLoprick of St. Anilrewu ; and, Laving the nomiiia- 
tiou of Ihe otlicr Prelates, conducted himself, even according 
to Ihe confession of Burnet, with great moderatiou. It is as- 
serted that, when accused by some of his old friends, of having 
betrayed their cause, he alleged that he was comvusnioned to avp- 
press the protesiing party ; and, if he bad not effectually per- 
formed that, he was contented to incur the reproach with 
which his own party loaded liini, lu truth, had Sharp acted 
ever so treacherously,' it would have been ridiculous to im- 
pute the restoration of Episcopacy to him, as the King's usual 
indifference certainly did not extend to Presbyterianism. 
After the Scottish Prelacy had been fixed, and Sharp norai- 
uated Primate in the Council at Whitehall, Earl Lauderdale, 
coming forth in a fury, met him and said : " Mr Sharp, Bishops 
you are to have in Scotland ; you are to be Archbishop of St 
Andrews ; but whoever shall be the man, by God, I will smite 
him and his order below the fifth rib," 

The Earl of Middleton established himself in Scotland, as 
the King's Commissioner, wilh au unwonted pomp. As the re- 
presentative of Majesty, at the banquet given by him to abnost 
all the nobility on the meeting of Parliament, he sat at a table 
apart, where the Earl of Athole, hereditary cupbearer, pre- 
sented the wine, with the usual ceremonies of tasting, and the 
knee* Lord Middleton found the nation in general willing to 

' (There Bre no BabstHDlial gronnds whstevcr for tlie id™ llinl Slurp had npu-j 
iraaoherouBly by [he modenilc kirl party, *ho»e orgsn he »a», »s ne ahnlJ illii«- 
tmlc in iho sequel. Mr Charles Kirkpntrick Sliarpe had oql nifled this question, 
nu to enable bim to do jiulicetoihe groat))' maligned Archbishop af St Andrews. 
There ra juit an much truth in Ihe RccDeatinni againitt hi« character, la there »■« 
rhristianity in the final act of malignity agaiasl his person.] 

< [A high farce, truly. This Middleton, rsited lo snch an elevab'Dn b; Cliarirs 
tlie SecaniJ, woH second in cotntnand to David Lesley {whom Charles II, also created 
a peer), when they rurpriBed Uontrose it Philiphaugh, (after the paltry and falal 
deeertlon of Ibnt Uiumphaul loyilUt by the Highlanders, and tbe Gordon eBTolry 
under Ahnyne) exlingaiflid llie royal cauce, and brutally murdered men, women 
uid childien, of the poor Irish remnaut, to the disgrace of Scotland and humauity. 
Ilie eieellent historiaii of tbe Church of Scotlnnd, Dr Cook, under a clause of hie 
hiHlory which lie entitles, " cruelty of the Covenanters, particularly of Ihe minla- 
ten," candidly admits that " they dinplayed a sarage violence which justly de- 
serves the reprobation of posterity ; not only nere those who Hed from the battle 
iuhanianly manacred, but, after all danger was past, many of the prinnen were 
put to dCDth.'l 



ViSfiOUNT OF DUNDKK. 



211 



submit to any laws which his master might wish to impose, 
and on sundry occasiotia conducted himself with more zeal 
than moderation ; while every action was misrepresented to 
the King hy the Earl of Lauderdale, who already longed to 
supplant Middleton, and continue his own reign in Scotland. 
At the sanetirae the Prosbyteriana ceased not to exclaim 
against the Commissioner, &a e. drunkard, an atheist, and a 
person of such hrutal manners, that when the Countess of 
Caithness, daughter to the Marquis of Argyle, knelt down be- 
fore him to request the interment of her father's head, he 
threatened to spurn her with his foot. 



The executions of Argyle and Guthrie, two most wicked 
and irreclaimable rebels, were to these people ample subjects 
of outcry and falsehood. On the trial of Argyle, Lord Middle- 
ton undertook the debate himself, and spoke, Burnet acknow- 
ledges, with great ability. The Marquis, on the other hand, 
made a most excellent defence. But the abominable cruelties 
committed by him during liis wars with Montrose were enough 
of themselves to render liim worthy of death. 

[We are enabled here to add, from an uuprinted and contem- 
porary source, the following curious particulars of Argyle'a 
demeanour on bis trial, by far the most creditable phase of 
his unhappy career ; — 

" At this lime, Archibald Campbell, the Marquis of Argyle, 
came to London, and lurked awhile until bo might steal an 
occasion to see the King ; and had the confidence and hope 
to have inveigled and obtained pardon for all those base trea- 
sons he had acted so covertly in Scotland since bis Majeaty'a 
departure, and that the King would pass by those many irre- 
verent sayes (speeches) of him, by him and the Kirk while he 
was there among them. But such was the general hatred and 
detestation of that people, especially of the nobility, against 
him, that tlie King gave order for bis commitment- It was 
generally reported, that Argyle hid got a response, imi>orting, 
that if ho got but a sight of the King's face there was do 
fear.* But while he was waiting at Court, and pleaded to 



2 1 :i MEMORIAI^ or TUE 

speak to the King, and fair for it, yet could not be admitted. 
Sir Oliver Fleming. Knight of the Black Rod, is sent to usher 
him to gaol. He desired to speak to Mr Calamy in his way to 
the Tower, but was refused that courtesy. At length he is 
secured prisoner in the Tower, from whence by sea the next 
month he was conveyed to Edinburgh, where his process was 
making, — the Earl of Middleton, the King^s great Commis- 
sioner, following him thither at the heels." 

" Ftrbniary 13, 1661, ArchibaM Campbell, Marquis of Ar- 
gjle, is brought before the Parliament, and his trial begun. 
He chose his advocate. Sir George Mackenzie of Bosehaugh, 
his chief advocate, who pleaded \-igorously for him. But the 
King s Advocate, Sir John Flesher, was too hard against him, 
bringing in several points of treason in his contrare (against 
him), which he offered to prove, and at last did so. Argyle 
i^'as very bold and confident in his own defence, with some 
reflections upon several,' especially the Kings Advocate, who 
told him openly, — * Archibald, it is not now with you as when 
you set up the fleshstoclcs betwixt the Cross and the Tron.' 
All that Argyle replied was, * A flesher dog bites sore.'* 

** Argyle 8 trial continued all March and April ; and, after 
hot and vigorous pleading, to the wonder and admiration of 
all lawyers, matters were clearly, and justly, carried in his 
contrare ; and Chancellor Cuninghame, Earl of Glencaim, 
pronounced the sentence of death against him, — that Archi- 
bald Campbell, the Marques of Argyle, for many treasonable 
acts proven in his contrare, should be hanged upon a gibbet at 
the Cross of Edinburgh, and his head cut ofi*, and set up upon 
the same iron prin upon which the said Marques of Montrose 
his head was set, 1650, now to he taken doicn.^ 

> [The fallen King of the Covenant could not fail to have store enoogh of reeri- 
minalioD agaioBt hifl prenent judges.] 

s [And the fox will tai*n at bay. It was a good retort ; the best, probabljr^ 
Argyle ever made. The vile system of conducting a state prosecution in a taunt- 
ing m(K>d, which happily would not now be tolerated for a moment, was by no 
means uncommon in those days. The surpassing dignity and eloquence of Mon- 
trose's reply to the Cliancellor Loudon, when reviling him ** from his base pre- 
eminence in the strains of a Bradshaw," affords a cliaracteristic contrast to Ar- 
gy lc*s retort to Sir John Fletcher.] 

' [ft addn greatly to the authenticity of the above record, that the writer of it 
was an eye-witncsK, and attentive observer, of all that passed on the melancholy 



YISCOL'NT OF DUNDKE, 



213 



" This aeutence being pronounced, — it ia obsorvftble, that, — 
in that very individual chamber and lodging in which Ajgyle 
lived in 1650, when the Marques of Huntiy was sentenced, 
his daughter, the Lady Roxburgh, came in to plead with him 
for a prorogation, or mitigation of the sentence against her 
father, the Marquis of Huutly, and was peremptorily denied 
by Argyle in his grandeur, — in this very chamber lodged 
Glencairn the Chancellor, when the Lady Caithness, and her 
sister, came in to him and the Gouunissioner together, to plead 
with them for the same favour at their hand, to their father 
Argyle, now under sentence and in a fever, and the aamo was 
point blank denied them. So that, what he denied to another 
in his straight, another denies now to him. Thus, Argyle 
might have said, — ' as I have done, so God hath requited me,' — 
and that, too, within the compaes of ten years ! There are 
changes in the right hand of the Almighty, to put in execu- 
tion when he will."'] 

This noble Marquis had a failing which is generally esteemed 



"I 

I 



occaiioD. " I WW," ba lay*," MoDlrose'itrm apon llw Jiuliee Port of Aberdasn ; 
UDther Dpon die South Port aF Dundee ; his head upon ibe Tallbooth of Edin- 
bnrgh : Jin / «eiv il tatn dgcn, axd AiyyU'i head jml aj> i» tlu jj^iei o/it,"] 

' [Tbs iUmvo iccoanl uf Ihs lut daf ■ of Argf Is in fra.ii a taanuMript ohronlcis 
cuiupUed by ibe Reieraod Junea Fruer, a clorgyman attached In Ihe Umilf uf 
LuvaL Us tella uahiin«lf, tliatfor thirty yean III* grandfather was ' major^onia' 
In SimDD eighth Lord LoTAt, who died in IG.tS. Thiu tlie gnuidsun became ehap' 
Iniii tu that Dubleman'B nioOFUor. Efenlually ho beounie epii>eD[«l clergynun at 
WanUaw, iu Inreruuea ahirr, and u coiidnucd until 17 IA, wiien he must hntra at- 
tained ■ grout age. The period of hia life embraces Ihe careers both of Montroae 
and Dundee, uil with a tnoal aympathiling lieart be accompaniod the ranner put 
of the way, dnrinic *■>■ nnlaneboly progrea* fnini the plaee of bis capture in the 
nirrtb to the •cafTold of tfae Covenant. The UlMory left in manunei-ipt by Ibii 
clergyman oounpin a large folio volume Tery eloKly writtsn. It profnHa to be a 
clinraialg of Ihe Imuw oF lila chief and (Wtron. But the writer i* on* of Ihoee ar- 
ilKtil dnmntie hiatorian* who Ibink that llieir aubjcct may aualaiD the graft uf a 
bifli'iry oT tlie world. In tDaoy rmpeeta iliia MS. chronide is curioua and valuable. 
1( Kaa eold eome yeare ago In liivcnieM, along wHh other eflecta of the late Mr 
TraHr uf Torhreck, a daoendiuK uf the elei-gynun who cumpitwl il. Some yeam 
Bgri, the purrluuwr, Mr Jobn Tluwiaon uf Liverpool, mnal obllglQgly, uiil liberally, 
Iniifiiiitied the precloiu ndnme to the author at llieae page*, when be waa writing 
hia Uai edlliiiu uf tb* Lifevf H'vlraM', whieli fuKuDUely tliiu ubiained the adrui. 
tag* of a moat miniile and aulbeutle account of (he laller day* of ibe bars. The 



liired u> ii> forlnnile purebaur ; 



i. WI'll w 



IV nf Ih 



214 MUMUIUAI-S OF TOE 

the concomitant of cruelty, and of which neither his descen- 
danls, nor iudced any other of liia name, have been guilty. 
Kirkton confesseB that he was conunonly reckoued tivioroua ; 
and Baillie mentions the " slanders of cowardice and cuUionry" 
with which his enemies oppressed him. It is certain tliat he 
frequently found a boat very convenient ; as at luverlochie, 
and ftftcrwanls on two different occasions. And that he waa 
no hloody duellist appears from the following passage in the 
contemporary memoirs of the Heverend Henry Guthrie, after- 
wards Bishop of Dunkeld. " The jealousies wliich royalists 
had always entertained of the Duke of Hamilton and his 
brother Lanerick, waa much increased, that they and the 
Marquis of Argyle were not so opposite in their designs aa 
they professed. For remedy whereof, and that it might ap- 
pear to the world that there was a real division amongst them, 
nothing less must serve the turn than a combat betwixt the 
Marquis of Axgyle and the Earl of Crawford-Lindsay, to be 
fought on Monday, March 21, (1648) at five of the clock in 
the morning, in the Links of Stony-hill, Major Innes being 
Argyle's second, and Lanerick, Crawford's. They kept the 
appointment, and were an hour upon the place before any 
rcddera^ came ; so that they had leisure enough to have fought, 
if they had been willing. However, the intention of it gave 
such offence to the Commission of the Church, that the Mar- 
quis ofArgyle was obliged to make his repentance before them, 
because he had such an hostile mind. And Crawford was de- 
sired to do the like, but would not. This combat furnished 
sport for a time." 

Of Argyle it may further be not«d, that his own father 
warned King Charles the First against him, as a treacherous 
ungrateful ynutb ; and to him in a great measure was it ow- 
ing that the aged Man^uis of Huntly, a venerable loyalist of 
eighty, lost his head upon the scaffold. 8eized by a rascal, 
one Menzies, Lieutenant-Colonel to Argyle, he was transferred 
to that glory of the Covenant, who, though his brother-in-law, 
not only delivered him over to the Puritans, hut made his life 
be demanded by the Kirk Commission, and afterwards pro- 
cured a grant of one-half of his estate t Argyle's sister, the 



I 



' ['"■ 



■".) 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DDiNDEK. 215 

"Viscountesfl of Eeumure. who pretended to a high strain of 
devotioQ, is eaid to liave predicated bis death, and that ha 
would end in blood. He retained hia hypocrisy to the last, 
enveighing severely from the scaffold against tlio debaucheries 
of the times, and observed, " that religion mnst not be made 
»he cock^lxxil, but the a/iip." He was as deformed in body as in 
mind, and to this day is distinguished among the Highlanders 
by the appellation of the glied Marquis. 

[The celebrated Sir George Mackenzie of Eosehaugh, whu 
did his duty so well as Argyle's leadiug counsel, left in manu- 
script a long account of the trial and death of his client, in 
which he says, — " I remember, that I having told him, a little 
before his deitth, that the peopk believed he was a coward, and 
expected he wooM die timorously, be said to mo ho would not 
die as a Roman braving death, but he would die as a Christian 
without being affrighted. Yet some concluded that he died 
without conrage because he shifted to lay down his head, and 
protracted time hy speaking at all the cornera of the scaffold, 
which was not usual, and buttoning his doublet twice or thrice 
after he was ready to throw it off." 8uch speculation was 
there about the state of Argyle's nerves iu this trying scene 
(through which he seems to have passed with as much courage 
as is necessary in any man), that his own medical attendant 
insulted liim ou the scaffold, by feeling his pulse, in order to 
be able to assure the people that fright had not forestalled the 
headsman. The sincerity of his religion, and the certainty of 
his salvation, were proved, before his death, by a aupernatural 
vision, iho evirlence for which was his own declaration of the 
fact ; and hia physical courage was demoustralcd, after his 
death, by the appearance of his digestive organs upon disscc- 
tiuu. He had rapidly digested a partridge. Justly coademned 
to die the death of Moulrose, but under a more humane regime 
lliau his owu inexorable tiats, the indignity of suspenetou was 
oomnuiicd to decapitation.] 

Argyle's fellow sufferer, Jnmcs Guthrie, was a fanatical 
preacher, better bom than the generality of hiii brethren, being 
a »on of the laird of Guthrie, He had written sundry sedi- 
tious lract« ; affronted the King lo his very face ; excommuni- 
cated the Earl of Middleton ; and wa» esteemed n shining 



216 )IL.MutilJM.S OF TDK 



I^bt unoog the godly. Hb bead being fised upon tlie 
Nflt)ietlx>W Port of Edinburgh, bedewed the top of Lord Mid- 
dlebm's coach, paesing nnder, with moDy dropR of blood ; 
which, say the whigs, uo waehing with water could efface. 
The Earl consulted medical gentlemeu on the subject, who to 
a man declared the continuance of the stain most strange and 
unnatural. Ue had better, mcthinks, have examined into the 
religious opinions of his coachman. The Earl was compelled 
to procure a new leathern cover for his carriage ; and this 
tesHmmiy of Guthrie's blood hath ever since been regarded by 
the whigs as a very convincing miracle. 

[One of the moat horrible petitions ever presented in the 
blasphemed name of God, bears the dominant signature of this 
man of blood. Noble loyalists, of the highest public and 
Christian character, and of the gentlest and most humane 
carriage, had fallen into the hands of the covenanting Grovem- 
ment, It pleased Argyle, Johnston of Warriston, Jamea 
Guthrie, and their crew, who usurped to represent " the Aft- 
semblies of the Lord's servants," that these their antipodes 
should die the death. Parliament, even the Argyle Parlia- 
ment, winced and demurred. Synod after Synod, under the 
leading of such Moderators as James Guthrie, demanded their 
blood ; and that rotten core of the Parliament of Scotland 
was compelled to yield. We have one of these petitions for 
blood before us. It is signed " Mr James Guthrie, Moderator, 
at the command of the Sj-nod," and dated, " ."ith December, 
1645 ; read in audience of the Parliament." It prays, or rather 
commands, as follows : — 

" We need not lay before your Honors what the Lord calls 
for at your hands in the point of justice, nor what you owe 
unto the many thousand of his people, whose blood is as water 
spilt upon the ground.' Your own light reaches unto the 
discerning of duty, and your piety and prudence, w"e trust, 
will make you faithful and zealous in the discharge of the 
same. Our intention is, not to convince your undrirstandinga, 
nor to fasten any imputation upon your affections, but to 
strengthen your hands in purging the land from blood-guilti- 
ness, whilst you do behold that the desires of justice j 



I 



i 



' [Meaniii; tlicrcK.v tlip rcln-l 



• i 



VISCOUNT OF DUKDEE. 217 

delinquents are not the scattered and inconsiderate wisbes of 
one or -two blinded witb prejudice, or transported with pa^ion, 
but the commoD and deliberate motions of tlte Assemblies of 
tfie Lord's servanls, after they have supplicated himself for 
direction, and searched for tmlh in his own Word, wkichpress- 
elh the administration o/ Justice with mvch veltemence and per- 
spicuity. We are therefore confident that your hearts wiU not 
faint, nor your hands fail, until you have cut off the horns of 
the wickrd, and made enemies bear the just reward of their 
violence and cruelty."' 

Against such men as the good President Spottiawoode, and 
that " tassel gentle" Lord Ogilvy, did this cry for blood go 
forth. And so this James Guthrie was most deservedly banged, 
as an incorrigible and truculent traitor, at the Restoration. 
Wodrow, of course, records him as a martjT. Malcolm Laiug, 
with a flourish of his historical stilts, tries to dignify his exit. 
But let none grudge the man who signs the above petition, a 
gallows to himself.] 

To the account of these worthies may here be subjoined 
some mention of Bir Archibald Johnstone, commonly called 
Lord WarriBton, the only other man of any eminence in Scot^ 
land who suffered for his accession to the late rebellion. But 
he contrived to avoid his fate for some time after the execution 
of Argyle and Guthrie, and was not seized till after Middle- 
ton's administrations had ceased. He was a person of good 
abilities, which he had perverted to the very worst purposes. 
After having had a hand in all the atrocities which conduced 
to the King's murder, he accepted of a peerage from Oliver 
Cromwell.' At the Restoration, he iled in disguise of a mer- 
chant to Ilumhurgh, where he remained about two years ; but 
afterwards paasiag into France, he was seized by Alexander 
Murray, and brought to Scotland, whore ha had sentence of 
death pronomicod upon him. Bishop Burnet asserts that be 
wua then iu a sort of doting state, disordered both in body and 
mind, so that it was disgraceful in any government to proceed 
against him. But the Bishop was Am ntphe^v. Lord Miildleton 
thought that his imbecility was feigned, which his subsnqueut 



> [From lliconslnil M!<. iti 
• [And an did \Tsy\f 1 



"I 



218 UELMORIAl^ or TUK 

behaviour on the scafTolJ makes probable, aod writes thus cod- 
ceming him to Sir Archibald Primrose. " Mr Secretary Ben- 
net, my Lord Dumfries, and myself, were laken up this whole 
day with examination of Waniaton, and some othera. He 
pretends to have lost his memory, and bo will give no account 
of anything. He is the most limorous pa-eon that I ever did 
ate in my life; and pretends that he can do the King great 
service, if he will give him his life, in putting the registers in 
good order, and settling the King's prerogative from old re- 
cords." Ou his cowardice, or cunning, the whigs raised a re- 
port that the King's physician, Bates, QvBt poisoned, and then 
took aixti/ ounces of blood from him at Hamburgh. But it can 
scarcely be credited that King Charles II., a merciful Prince, 
would authorize such a cruel piece of treachery, especially to a 
foe of Warriston's insignificance ; and Bishop Burnet, as partial 
to his relative as prejudiced against the Stewart family, takes 
not the smallest notice of the affair.* Kirkton alleges that 

> [Neither nonld /wiiofiinj, and excenive bleeding, change, by suuli artiflflikl 
mPKiiB, ■ ourugeoiu Climtian oonatitntiun, s»d of bd aged moji, iaUi BDcb an 
energy of debased terror an nid Wnrriaton djsplayi^d when pleading for hi* own 
lile. Sir Goorge Haekeuzic thua describes it : " The CUancfllor and alben waited 
to examine liim ; he fell upiin bia tace, roaring, aud with tears entreated they 
would pity > poor crenture wliD had fsryot all that was in hia Bible. This mond 
all the spectators with a deep melancholy, and the ChsHGellor, reflecting upon 
the mao'a great parts, former esteem, and tho great share he had in all tiia late 
revolution.', could not deny sotiie tears to tho frailty of silly mankind. At his 
euminaiiun, ho prelciidid ihal ho had lost so much hlu^, by ihe unskilfuhieaa 
of his ehirurgeoDS, ttiat he lust bis ni-mory with hi* blood ; and 1 renlly beKeve 
thai his tonragt bad indeed been drawn out with it. Within a few days he ww 
brought before the Parliament, where he (UscoTci'ed nothing but much wenkneas, 
raHHiHj «p ami duKB ufiOK hit knu) btyg\»n mercy. But the rarliament ordained 
hia farmer seuleuue to be put to execution si the Croea of Edinburgh. At iiis eie- 
cation he showed more i-omposure than formerly, which his friends asorilwd to 
Uod's miraculous kindness for him. But otheiv tlioughl thai he liad only formerly 
s disguise of niadneas is escape death in it, and that, findiog Ihe mask 



X had n 



lohUw 



is<l lost. 



i> his 



•thich 



Phiiiphaiigh, would m 
hands from tlie innnc 
beat of Scotland, wh 
Ballbor, " had a ioHt) 



.ho, evcu afior the glut of cnld-bloodcd 
■ Iha uiisenible aiui shrinking l>ariiamenl to Way their 
id of Sir Robert Spottis«-oode, and many othera uf llic 
]irisoners of war. "Sir Archibald JoIinstou,"|^jB 
e House, entreating them tu unity among them- 



scItcb, to lay all private respei'ts and into resia aside, and loiinJuMiM on diliHijiittiri, 
and malii^naiili (loyalisla), showing tlmt their i/rlniiing/vria'f/ii had.'provolert GihI's 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



210 



the King's dislike of Warriston was not occasioned by his 
public actings, but by the many reproofs lie had bestowed 
upon his Majesty, because of bis debauchery, and more espe- 
t.cially for hia committing a rape upon a young gentlewoman 
I t>I quality. But this gentlewoman is like the other goni 
I women of like misfortune in these histories, — she 
[ D&me. Eirkton also says that Warriston " was a,gfeat obser- 
I ver of providences," and, according to the rule^^et with very 
[ many remarkable providences himself. ^^^len Kirkton paid 
a visit to him while in confinement, W^iriaton affirmed that 
he could never doubt of his own sM^^Woy, he^aiLjA often 
Been God's face in the house of p^yer^j-;:::^rt|t]jietJfer\veening 
confidence seems latterly to haj*«^^ej;^dlijin ; for when he 
came to the scaflolJ, be fcefi^fitjy^^eaiil to thej people — " your 
prayers, your prayers.'^^.J^Ji'^cending it^o added, " I en- 
treat you, quiet your<&rt^ htlle, till tWSdying man deliver 
hia last speech among you." He,y*iren proceeded to read a 
very coherent declaration of hij>i6aily and spiritual infirmities, 
his unshaken adherence to^Ke Covenant, his innocence of the 
King's murder, and on minting tl 

" Your prayers, your pia^era^^WMr-prayers I desire i 
name of the Lord." He was a rapacious, artful, time-eervin, 
statesman ; an indefatigable prayor ; a merciless poJ> 
After the execution, his bead was separated from thojj 
exalted beside that of his dear friend Guthrie. Bu(fT.ieutenant- 
General Druminond, afterwards Viscount o^/fil^^ttiylan, his 
son-in-law, had influence enough to g 
terred with his body in the Greyfriarv 
burgh. 

In the meantime, the Covenant had beai 
treated as the muster-roll of rebellion, yiiho, 
settled in their dioceses, and the infcriory 
But the vulgar, inflamed by the loiniatoitfwbo were expelled 
from the churches for nonconformily7 a measure effected by 
Fairfowl. Arcbbisbop of Glasgow, contrary to the inclination 



C. gmt M.r 


vinti ftgainil tliriii, I)hi nwn 




It wu WuTifton. 


Um, who rwtJ 


CDS axon Mou 




0* tu hiiit, b,fon- 111. 


> P.ili.n.rn( ; 


ohm 


lie miglit hnt 


e iHrni, bj llii 


B Iniglitett of 




ohm 


hi> a»a larn 


MtUB. Am.iujt 


II.B Wwlruo 


MS.S.i-.R.,BL(,„ 


i«ij:..»d) fi^fi. 1 


L-.i,ni 


»v)l, ISil, Id 




taOOIl Merliiie 


;!J 







ii^ 



J 



220 



MtMOItlAlS OF TriE 



of Sharp who faTOured moderate coimsels, and enraged by 
the exaction of fines for their own resistance to Episcopacy, 
were ripening fast into rebellion. The same spirit which pro- 
duced the disorders of the former reign, still existed, nay, daily 
became stronger, and military force was absolutely necessary 
to place the curates in their pulpits. These unfortunate pas- 
tors found themselves entrusted, not with a flock of innocent 
sheep, but a body of ravenous wolves, ready to tear them to 
pieces. If a whig had got drunk at an alehouse, or made free 
with a female enthusiast over night, he esteemed an affront^ 
given to thf curate next morning, a testimony of his repentance, 
and a propitiation for his sin. The women of piety, on publioi 
occasions ever forward to prove their zeal by the most shame-] 
ful excesses, not only abused the clergy themselves, but hunt* 
ed them with their numerous brats, who were instructed to 
yell forth whenever the curate appeared, and to pelt him with 
dirt ; while the inhabitants of whole parishes wandered every 
Sunday into the wilds, after the doctrine of their former 
ministers, leaving the churches desolate, and the clergyman 
in despair of being able to effect their conversion. 



I 



That the reader may form some idea of the fascination at- 1 

tached to the field preachers, a few extracts from such of their \ 
sermons as have been printed, are subjoined. In the dift- I 
courses preserved there are many more ridiculous passages j I 
but for eschewing the sin of blasphemy, they are suffered to I 
rest in oblivion. As the style of oratory continued ever tho I 
same, from the dawn of Knox to the sunset of Renwick, it \ti% 
unnecessary to attend to chronology in the excerpts. 

The minister generally began by a tender encomium on the | 
Solemn League and Covenant, which properly led to the most j 
virulent abuse of its violators, the King, the Bishops, and the | 
Statesmen, vented in a strain of grossuess and malevolence 1 
now shocking to almost every mind. But addressing (Jod ] 
Almighty himself in so familiar a way as they practised, it is 
not wonderful that they shewed little respect to earthly digni- 
ties. The following passage, from a sermon preached by 
Richard Cameron, a great saint, and founder of a sect which 



VISCOUM UF DDXDf.E. 



221 



pttill retains his name, gives tlie loyalty, compressed, of all his 
I predecessors : — 

' How comeB it, tliat there is so little knowledge of God io 

this land ? Because of swearing, lying, stealing, and com- 

[ mitting adultery. I wonder if there be any such sinners here 

this day ? I will tell you, that there are more of you in the 

west country that scruple not to swear by faith and truth. 

We have but little to do with such professors. It is a very 

Bad thing, that though we reprove you, we cannot get you to 

I leave off your minced oaths, haith and faith, Ac. You know 

I what it is to commit adultery. The enemy of God, that tww 

I ntaupon the throne, ts one of the moat vile adulterers that lives. 

] And from him it descends to noblea, gentlemen, and burgesses, 

I and commons of all sorts ; so that everj' one is, as it were, 

i neighing aft^r his neighbour's wife. dreadful ! What think 

[ ye of these things ? What is the King, and what is the Council, 

and what are all our persecutors, but fools and fanatics. But 

I I eay they are nothing different from these horses,' if not 

I madder. For we make the horses ride through moss and 

muir, and sometimes we ride them so deep that we cannot get 

I them out again. The DevH rides and drives King Charles 

I the Second, and his Council, through moss and muir, and over 

1 craigs and rocks."* 

Alpxander Poden, another preacher, and a prophet to boot, 
I holding forth in the parish of Glenluce, said : — " Now ye in 
I this country-side, ere it be long, will all bo charged to go and 
[ hear these cursed curates. And when yo are charged to go 
I there, look the 5th of the Galations, 19, 20. I nay, look to 
I that Scripture well, and think with yourselves that day, lads 
J and lasses in this country-side, that such a fool as I have told 
I you it, that going to hear these profane hirelings, would lake 
I yoK to Hell as soon as idolatry, adulteries, teilvhcm/t, or any 
L of these sins which are named in that plai:o I have citc-tl unto 
t-you." 



^K ut< 



> [Tb* liorata of lh« bJiiKDtIc1« confregUlnaii UMmblei) in the moon 
DMulIf [Mckstsd betide tliom.] 

* [ Wklkrr Uw pmlUr, Peden'i biognphar, tpeaVi of ■• the Uiikf of York. ■ 
iehriit, tit lUrili LinUmttI, at Mr SiitUt wnf to oill Hm U r 
Lit* of CRnieron. BioR. Pm. i, l«T. Edlnbuq;!), T. C, RUTFiiK.n, ie37.| 



222 HEMORlAt^ OP THE ^^H 

Peden's Bermons alone furnish a cnrious testimony oT Hie 
respect these demagogues entertained for those of the higher 
ranks of society who encour^ed not their doctrines, as well 
as for the unhappy curates. AuldSaTuiie, as he usually styled 
himself, said at a conventicle ; — " 111 tell you what oar great 
folk in Scotland are like. They are like so many ladies goiog 
to sea in a boat in a calm day for their pleasure ; bnt afl long 
as the sea is calm, and they see the ground, and no fear of 
hazard, they bid the boatman row out ; but whenever the wind 
blows a little, and the waves begin a Utile to rise and swell^ 
and they begin to lose sight of the ground, then they cry out, 
— ' fie, in to the shore again.' the base dang the Kirk iS' 
getting from many of the ministers of Scotland in our days. 
About thirty-six years ago, our Lord had a great thick bacl 
train of ministers and professors in Scotland. But one blast 
blew six hundred of our ministers from him at once, and they 
never came back to him again. Yea, many lords, and lairds, 
and ladies followed him then. But the wind of the storm 
blew the ladies' gaUantries in their ej'cs, and their ears both, 
which put them both blind and deaf 1 The lords, lairds, and 
ladies, were all blown over the brae. Alas, for the apostacy 
of nobles, gentles, ministers, and professors in Scotland." 

WTienever the fanatic preachers mentioned our Savionr, 
they represented him, in the language of the Canticles, as 
a brisk gallant, or impatient bridegroom, which might be a 
chief reason for the wonderful increase of female conversion ; 
even more potent tlian the Geneva translation of Genesis, 
which informed them that Eve wore fig-leaf breeches. Per- 
haps the native spirit of contradiction added double energy to 
other impulses. Whatever was the cause, the effects were 
prodigious, for the weaker vessels clung with the utmost jrer- 
scverance to their darling declaimers, through all the asperities 
of situation, the inclemencies of the weather, the destruction 
of their famihes, and the dangers of horse-ponds, or even the 
gallows. 

Yet the godly ladies, and handmaids of Heaven, suffered 
many particular reproaches from their beloved pastors ; and 
insinuations, against the whole sex, one would suppose very 
hard of digestion. Richard Cameron, preaching at Kirkmahoe. 



of 

.d _ 

'J 



VISCOUNT UF DUNDEE. 



223 



^^^pnear Dumfries, bad the rudeuess to tell his female followers, — 
^^^B " Those who come out to see a man only, ot to he seen of men 
^^H here to-day, will probably go away as filthy an tbey came." 
^^^1 And Mas John Livingston bad long before preacbed a sermon 
^^H concerning Lot's wife, wbich must have fundamentally atfront- 
^^H «d the fairer part of bis congregation. His text was from St 
^^H Luke xrii. 32, " Aemember Lot's wife," and be went on 
^^H thus: — 

^^H " But ye will perhaps say, what should we here remember 
^^^B concerning her? First, remembcrthatshewasLot's wife; agood 
^^H man's wife, and a professor too; and brought up and educated in 
^^B good company. It may be, that she was of good education 
^^B also ; but alas, that did not her turn ; she is set up between 
^^H heaven and earth for a memorandum ; and we havo no more 
^^H certainty of her descent than that she was Lot's wife. There- 
^^H fore, though your good parentage and education be a mercy, 
^^H yet boast not of it. And though you have dwelt long in a 
^^H good house, what of that? May not Satan tempt you there, if 
^^H ye have not the root of the matter within you ? Carefully ro- 
^^H cord these things that ye may forget none of them. For there 
^^* are many careless professors, eapectaUy woToen, similar to Lot's 
wife ; and many others among you are but bad instruments in 
a country side, and ringleaders to wicked coursea. Therefore, 

■ pray that ye be not a grief, and as plagues unto your hus- 
bands, nor a vexation unto your parents and relations. Jte- 
member Lofs wife. But, ye may say, what did she ? She was 
neither •*••• nor thief, — as we commonly say, — but she look- 
ed back, and could not go straight on in the way with her hus- 
band. Hence you may take this lesson, that all do not ac- 
1 count of things as we do. Who could have thought that there 
should have been so much business for so small a fault 1 Be- 
fneraber Lot's wi/f. But ye will say, what moved her to do 
BO, — to look back contrary to express command? It was a 
piece of Apr own curioaity. She thought she might, in this 
matter, take some of her own will, when she was nigh half 
way at Zoar. And you know that Jacob's daughter, in going 
out to see the daughters of the land, was defiled ; therefore 
return in again ; for this was an evil sight to her, and to all 
that belonged to her, and Id all the Shechcmites also. Old 



i 



221 



MKMORIAI^ OF THE 



Sodom comeB into her miud again, as in the cftse of tlie 
Israelites in the wilderness, when lusting after the onions and 
garlick which they had while in Egypt, Truly that was 
Btrange. For you know garlick bath no agreeable taste. But 
what shall we say ? Anything of Egj-pt or Sodom is good when 
we are out of them. Yea, many only tliink, — ' what meant I, 
when I was in the acts of my wickedness, that I took not my 
pennyworth of it' (as we sometimes say). It was even so with 
her, looking back to her old but bad companions. Lastly, 
Remember Lots wife. But, after all, ye may perhaps say, what 
ehould we remember of her ? No good, I warrant you ; and 
therefore more sad is tho subject to speak of. Betnember Lot's 
wife ; a backslider indeed ; which is Scotland's sin this day, 
therefore, pray that this may never be your case. Moreover I 
may say unto you, who are profane professors, again Remem- 
ber Lofs wi/e, and let it be your memento always." 

This abridgment exhibits pretty fairly the spirit of the 
conventicle discourses, in which the reproof of the most grie- 
vous sins was calculated to produce nothing but laughter, Mr 
Donald Cargill told hia congregation that " a life of prosperity, 
with a weddcdness to one's own ways, and a broken wall to 
lean upon, are very dangerous things. We say, prosperity in 
sin is both dangerous and dreadful. And yet you would be at 
it, at any rate. We would take pleasures were they never so 
dreadful, Rome have taken them as foul as they could have 
them. I say, prosperity in sin is a very dangerous thing. 
There are few that ever love it more than when it was some- 
what warm and dangerous. But ye will get it warm yet. 
Tea, ye will get it as hot as Hell." 

These exhortations and rebukes were uttored with great 
gesticulation, and a wonderful power of lungs, producing ex- 
traordinary effects upon the audience, who sighed, groaned, 
and shed tears abundantly. No fanatic could hear old John 
Welsh utter a single sentence without weeping; his convey- 
ance, as they called it, was so affecting. And when the minis- 
ters set themselves to pray, the old women would destroy their 
head dresses, by tearing off their bt'gonela and mutches. For 
their favourite preachers they had nicknames of endearment. 
Andrew M'Cormack, a pains-taking Irishman, was called TTie 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



226 



Goodman; while the Irish whigs styled Mr Josias Welsh. 
" because of his mighty, rousing, wakening, preaching gift,"' 
the Cock of the North ; or, as the author of the Worthies will 
have it, the Cock of the Conscience. 

When the Preahyteriaii ck-rgy committed their lucubrations 
to writing, they were not at all more refined in their expres- 
sion. Samuel Rutherford, in his " Peaceable Plea for Paula 
Preebyicry in Scotland," descanting on ecclesiastical schisms, 
says; — " The essential ingredients and reasons of a lawful 
divorce are here ; we could not lye in one bed with that some- 
time sister-Church of Rome, hut our skin behoved to rub on 
her botch-boil ; and therefore we did separate from nothing 
but corruption," His Kpistles, long relished by his sect, are 
fraught with the most blasphemous obscenity. 

The poor ladies got littlequarter from the reforming preachers 
ever since the days of Sir David Lyndsay, who penned a bitter 
satire on the side tails, and muzzlet faces, of the Scottish ladies. 
There is a passage in John Knox's History, of which I must 
here give a sample. Speaking of the ParUameut of 1563, he 
says : — " Sick stinking pride of women as was seen at that Par- 
liament, was never before in Scotland. Three Sunday days, the 
Queen rode to the Tolbooth. The first day she made a painted 
oration ; and there might be heard among her flatterers, ' Vox 
Pianoe,' the voice of a goddess (for it could not be Dei), and 
not of a woman I ' God save that sweet face, was there ever 
orator spoke so properly, and so sweetly," &c, 

Tljat high and potent Princess, Margaret Duchess of New- 
castle, felt 80 much iudigation against the preachers of her 
time for like reproofs, that she wrote a satire on the subject 
in a strain of no common poetry. She complains that : — 

" Preochon in tbeir piilpiti do declaim 

'GuiMt ilrcwing nru, ■nd nII our sex do bUmo 
For [ilMt«d braid*, pcndanli, and cnrlcd iMir, 
And all o«r wvcriil gannenU thai wB irear. ' 
A ft'allior'd fan, tbough it cuola the nillry lieal. 
With terrible thnrnta, Uey in our vara da brat ; 
Black patcbca on our facp. |iiiu[ilei In hide, 
Thvj rail aptimt. and call ibciu marki ufpridaj 
Aod evFry lliiog iiiiloed irhii^h we ilo wear 
'rbt7 fti'laim Hjjainul, a* ifibi-ir ibruuts ibcy'd Inu-. 
15 



226 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Sure they would have us Adamites^ yet know 
Against * bare necks^ tbey thundering words outtbrow ! 
This last, I do conclude without all doubt, 
Tis that we are not naked quite throughout/* 

Mr James Kirkton, after the Eevolution, preaching against 
a female covering for the head, called a Cock-up, in his chiirch 
in Edinburgh, said, — " I have been this year of Grod preiwjh- 
ing against this vanity of women ; yet I see my ovra daughter 
in the kirk even now have as high a cock-vp as any of you 
aU."! 

Another, declaiming against the vanity and gaudiness of 
women, spoke thus : — " Behold the vanity of women ! Look 
to them I Youll see first a satin petticoat, Kft that, there is 
a tabby petticoat ; lift that, there is a Holland smock ; lift that,*' 
Ac. " Eve was not so vain ; she sought no covering but fig 
leaves*" 



[Section III. — Administration of Lauderdale and Bothes in 
Scotland, from the first Tumults on the Placing of Curates in 
the Churches of the Expelled Ministers, to the Murder of 
Archbishop Sharp.] 

On the disgrace of Middleton, Lord Lauderdale found him- 
self in possession of that power he had so long desired. 

> [Patrick Walker, in his Life of Peden, tells us : — ** Sumo years ago also our 
women deformed their heads with cock-ujjt ; aud now they defonn their bodies with 
boopa, or fardingales, nine yards about ; some of them in three stories ; yery nn- 
becoroing in women professing godliness, more fit for liarlotfl : If they had now 
distinguising attires, and places where they resorted, as it seems they had of old, 
they would be easeful to men orer-ruu and over>driven with the fury of unbridled 
luits, as Judah was when he went to sheer his slieep. I remember about thirty 
yean ago, when cock-upt were in fashion, some of them half a yard high, set up with 
wires, a tclid, teriouB^ Christian gentlefcoman told me, she was going to a friend's 
w«ddtng ; her comrades constrained her to put herself in that dress ; she was un- 
CHMiy in her mind, and thought she was not herself through the day ; when she came 
homo, before she changed herself, she went to her closet to bethink herself how alie 
had ii|)«nt that loose time, aa weddings and fairs are to the most part, and few that 
ktHip a bridle* hand to their spirits at such times ; after some thoughts she went to 
|ifMi)oi' 1 h^r conscience challenged her so sharply, that she rose hastily, plucked it 
%ftt MHt) ihi*i»w U from her, saying, — < Thou or no such thing shall ever come on my 
\m^ <»!■ body that I dare not pray with.' **—Biog, Pret, i. 138.] 



I 

I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEi:. Sli 

Kothes, indeed, waa appointed Commiesioiier to Parliament, 
but he waa governed by the other, whose favour ■with the 
King, udded to a vast fund of address, left him witliout a rival 
ijo his Scottish commaud. Ho was a man of great knowledge, 
both natural and acquired. During his imprisonment, after 
the battle of Worcester, he had applied his mind to hterature. 
He studied divinity, history, both ancient and modem, and 
languages, including Hebrew, with great success. From his 
letter to Richard Baxter, who published it in bis " Certainty 
of the World of Spirits," 1G91, — a letter well written, as waa 
every thing that fell from his pen, — it is manifest that he at 
one time believed in ■nit<;licraft.' The Duke relates a story 
laepecling a woman, near Dunse, possessed by the devil, who 
oorrected a clergj'man's false Latin; of a house near Edin- 
burgh, " haunted these fifty or sixty years," He adds, — " But 
,1 must leave room for my Loudun Nuns, and not write a book. 
In the year 1637, being at Paris in the spring, the city was 
so full of the poasessioH of a whole cloyster of nuns, and some 
Iftick wenches at Loudun, books printed, and strange stories 
told, tliat few doubted it; and I, who was persuaded such a 
thing might be, and that it was not impossible the Devil could 
possess a nun as well as another, doubted it aa little as any 
body. So, coming into that country, I went a day's journey 
out of my way to satisfy my curiosity. Into the chapel I came 
in tho morning of a holy day, and with as little prejudice m 
»ny could have, for I believed verily to have seen some strange 
Bights. But when I had seen exorcising enough of three or 
of them in the chapel, and could hear nothing hut wanton 

inches singing loose songs in French, I began to suspect a 

rbr." " One more journey 1 mu<lc to see possessed women 
ixorcised near Antwerp, anno 1649 ; but saw only some great 

illand wenches hear exorcism patiently, and belch moat 
labomiiiably. So, if those were devils, they wr-re wiijdy devils ; 
tbut I thought they were only poBsosscd with a morning 
draught of too new beer." 

But his orthodoxy, and indeed all notions savouring of reli- 



' [UmlenUIr <rv ollllns MoueIi to cnail, or abow 




^r>i>l> nf lh> C.,vri.>i>(, *l>;r1i IIK.V be («m>»( Uldifii 


mlr>cl» ) but hf dcHdrd, 


•B>1 !*l<viM niih •CTiri>, 111* lylmituli mmlat <>f ilir Tat] 


iiolic mliMlro ] 



228 



.VEHORIALS OF THE 



gioii, quicklj vanished, if we may trust Burnet, who seems, in 
the true spirit of ingratitude, to bave regarded the Peer with 
a most perfect hatred. lAuderdale was certainly a politician 
of the Machiaveli persuasion, and of a temper so yioUnt, that i 
bis fits of passion resembled the paroxisms of insanity. When | 
the Scottish gentry of the west refused to enter into the Bond, 
as it was termed, he bared his arm to the elbow at the Council 
Board, and swore they should be compelled to do it ; an anec- 
dote perhaps as authentic as that given by Knox of M. IfOsele, 
the Queen Regent's French General, who, on reading a letter 
from the Congregation, did ri/ve (tear) his own beard for rage. 
But tliough the Earl was imprudent in his choler, he well 
knew how to preserve his place in the King's favour; going 
80 far as to attire himself in a petticoat, and dance before 
Charles, when the disaster of his fleet at Chatham had occa- 
sioned him to be melancholy ; and this exhibition, were the I 
Earl as hideous and awkward as the Bishop of Salisbury aa- I 
eerts {though Sir Peter Lely's portraits would persuade us to 
the contrary), must have been beyond measure diverting. 
Burnot asserts that he made a very ill figure ; he was very big, 
his hair red, and hanging oddly about him ; and his tongue, 
like that of King James the Sixth, too large for his mouth, so 
that he bedewed those to whom he addressed his conversation. 
But though his manners and appearance were uncouth, though 
the Iluke of Buckingham pronounced him a man of a blun- 
dering understanding, Butler sings — 

" Although bis blubber face ia sacb 
A pbii as does not promise much, 
Ytt be ha5 cunniii<t to unravd 
The very mvrteries of ibe Devil." | 

He certainly long retained his influence over a very fastidious 
and volatile monarch, only losing it with his own intellects, 
which sank into a miserable decay sometime previous to hia 

death. 



John, Earl (afterwards Duke) of Rothes, was the aon of i 
puritanic sire (styled the reforming Earl), hy the Lady Anne 
Erdrine. daughter to John, Earl of Mar. In the craft and 



V 




^nSCXHINT OF DDNDEE. 



22!) 



I 



villany of hia time none exceeded the father, who was the very 
kej-stone of the Covenant, and cunning enough to persuade 
the Marquis of Montrose, naturally loyal, to embrace the cause 
of the Covenanters, Though with pretences to thorough sano- 
tification, he was a man of inordinate gallantry. Archbishop 
Laud, in the history of his own troubles and trial, gives this 
curious account of him ; — " On Tuesday, August 10. 1641, his 
Hajesty rode away post into Scotland, the Parliaments sitting 
ID both kingdoms, and the armies not yet dissolved. Thero 
was great scaiming about this journey ; and the House of 
Commons sent some Commissioners thither, as the Scots had 
Bome here. Among the Scotch CommisBionera the prime man 
waa the Earl of Rothes, who was also one of the greatest and 
most zealous leaders of the Scottish rebellion, under the pre- 
tence of religion, and a deadly enemy to the Earl of Strafford, 
and was heard to say more than once tliey would have his 
head, — and tbey had it. But much about this time (Rothes) 
bis zeal was so great among the women, and the citizens 
wives, that he fell into disease ; and divers of his friends going 
to visit him, wore not admitted to see him ; and at last he 
was conveyed from London to Richmond, by hia aunt the 
Lady Roxburgh, where he died. But this base and dishonour- 
able end of his they concealed as much as they could," 

His BOQ, to manners the most gentle and insinuating, added 
a great Sow of wit. He possessed the art of prepossessing 
every one in his favour, and was much caressed by the King, 
whom he resembled in his demeanour and vivacity. His litera- 
ture was scanty, but that defect he compensated by his natural 
quickness. He had a very handsome face and figure, and in 
his gallantry took after his father. The Reverend Robert 
Baillie, in one of bis letters, thus relates aome circumstances 
of a very serious fracas, which occurred during the Usuqiation. 
owing to his intimacy with a lady, who afterwards became 
Countess of Carlisle: — " The Earl of Rothes is put into the 
Castle (of Edinburgh) on a most shameful occasion. My Lord 
Howard's tiistcr married with my Lord Balgony, Rothes's sis- 
ter's son, General Leslie's grandson. This Howard's wife, a 
very light woman, tame to make a risit to Fife, where her 
carriage every where was exceeding wnntin R'-tli*-!* "|ienly 



230 MEMORIALS OF THE 

bore her too much companT, to the offence of many. How* 
ever, about that time she is got with child, which she bears 
to Loudon. Her hngband falls in an outrageous jealousy with 
lier, suspects my Lord Belasis, whom his brother fightd in that 
quarrel, but suspects Bothes more, and in a rage posts towards 
Scotland to fight Bothes. The Protector hearing of it, causes 
follow and apprehend Howard, and sends an order in haste to 
secure Rothes in the Castle of Edinburgh, where yet he lies 
in great infamy." 

He was afterwards accused of neglecting his own wife, a 
very godly Presbyterian woman, daughter of the Earl of Craw- 
ford, and of living in too much friendship with the Lady Anne 
Gordon. But what scandalized the whigs more than all the 
rest, was his intimacy with the Primate of Scotland. In this 
case Judas obscured Jesabd, though he frequently shewed 
much lenity to the rebels, and actually prevented the torture 
of the boot being applied to one of their women, alleging 
that it was not seemly for gentlewomen to wear boots ; yea, 
albeit he winked at the practices of his wife's confessors, with 
good store of whom she was well provided, yet these ingrates 
denounced him as nothing better than his colleagues, a child 
of the devil and perdition. 

The Chancellor Loudon, so celebrated for his zeal in the 
work of reformation, was also notorious for his incontinence. 
The wife of one Major Johnstone bore him several children. 
His gallantry is confirmed by Clarendon, who says, that " he 
was so obnoxious for his loose and \4cious life, which was 
notorious, that he durst not provoke Argyle or the clergy by 
dissenting from them." Neither, on the very same account, 
dared he to exasperate his wife, who seems to have had a 
spirit like my Lady Monson's. From Burnet we learn that 
Loudon, when in England, made very solemn promises both 
to the King and the Hamiltons ; but, on his return to Scot- 
land, Lady Loudon, who was an heiress, and had brought to 
him almost all he possessed, threatened, that if ho went on in 
that way she would raise against him a process of adultery ; 
of which she would have had very copious proofs. The poor 
caitiff was therefore obliged to turn again to the other side, 



V^ 



^^^B VISCOUNT OF DUXDEE. 231 

making public professions of rapentanca for his fit of honour 
and loyalty, in the High Church of Edinburgh, with many 
villanous tears and grimaoeb. 

[It will not be foreign to the object of these historical re- 
searches and ilhistrations, if we here proceed to redeem the 
character of Charles the First from a calumnious story, of 
which this Earl of Loudon has been made the hero, although 
he never beard of it himself. It forms an imposing page of 
the groat work of Hallam, while, with coartser hands, Laing 
and Brodie have rubbed it into the history of Scotland. And 
yet the source of it is utterly worthless. It is said to ftavt 
been said by Bishop Burnet ! The tradition is, that the 
Bishop narrated the calumny in question, to a company in- 
cluding " several English Peers," that be said he had found 
a record of it in tbe Hamilton chart«t-chest, — where no ona 
has ever found it since, — and that, in tilling the story, he ex- 
cused himself for not having published it in bis Memoirs of 
the Hamiltoiis, by reason, as he is said to have said, " I could 
not put down every thing I found in tbc papers committed to 
me, because some things would not bear telling." Burnet, if 
this report of his conversation he true, must have meant, that 
some falsehoods might pass current in talk, and enter history 
in due time, that were too gross to escape detection if pub- 
lished in his " Own Time." 

Loudon, one of the Scots Commiasioncrs, had been sent to 
Uio Tower for his participation in the letter of the coveuant- 

Iing nobles to the French King. While thus in custody, 
during the short inter\-al between the lllh of April, and 
27th of June 1640, " King Charles I.," as Burnet is reported 
to have told, " in his passionato reseutment against htm, sent 
a warrant 1o Sir William Bitlfonr, Lieutenant of the Tower, 
to execute the prisoner for high treason, the next morning.'' 
This order, as the story goes, the Lieutenant oouimnnicated to 
his noble prisoner, who having neither been libi^Ucd nor tried, 
grievously complained of the barbarity, and urged his jailor lo 
go for the Marquis of Uamilt^in, which accordingly he did. 
These two instantly repaired to the King, but had some diffi- 
culty in obtaining audience, hia Majenly l>cing in bed. First, 
Sir William Balfour " fpll on his knees a( the bedside," and 



I 



^^ 



1iS2 UKMOKIALS OF ThX 

prayed for a recall of the warrant ; but the King was inex- 
orable. Then entered the Marquis of Hamilton, " and fell 
lifcewiae on his knees at the bedside, and begged that he wonM 
not insist upon such an extraordinary rescilution," The King 
Btill held out, but was at lengtli moved by the Marquis's part- 
ing threat, — " 111 go, and get ready to ride post for Scotland 
to-morrow morning ; for I am sure before night the whole 
city will be in an uproar, and they'll come and pull your 
Majesty out of your Palace ; I'll get as far as I can, and de- 
clare to my countrymen that 1 had no hand in it." Upon 
which, the King said, " give me the warrant ; and taking it, 
tore it in pieces."' 

This fiction, the most impudent and ridiculous that waa 
ever palmed by party malevolence upon political history, 
attracted little or no attention, until Dr Birch gave it cur- 
rency in 1756. It was most jesuitically adopted by Malcolm 
Laing, who at the same time had not failed to perceive that the 
anecdote was utterly at variance with the habits and temper 
of the King. Recording it as an historical fact, he adds this 
confused and contradictory quali6cation, — " The fact appears 
to be more conformable to the precipitate counseh, than to the 
character of Charles, who was arbitrary, but averse to the 
execution of a sanguinary measure." Our historian had forgot- 
ten, that the Marquis of Hamilton, the main source of the 
King's " precipitate counsels," is figured to have been counsel on 
the other side, and that the truth of the sSory is entirely depen- 
dent upon the fact of the King himself having suddenly con- 
ceived the iniquity, to the surprise and horror of his worst 
counsellors. 

The Earl of Loudon, whose commitment to the Tower was 
notorious, lived to the year 1663, and not a whisper of his 
having incurred any such jeopardy, ever reached the ear of 
any one of " the Brethren," from that rampant rebel himself, 
who certainly entertained no such feelings towards Charles 



in his " Inqiiirv into the share which Ch>rt«s I. hul in (he TniiiB- 
^rl of GlunorgBD,'* &c., givH lor history thi* moat absurd itorj', 
nn the authority of " ■ moiioraHdiiM wriltcn by Dr W]ut« Kcnnet, then Bishop of 
Peterborough, in the hljink leaf of his copy of Burnel'» Memoirs, now in poaiswon 
of tb* Honourable Mr Oisrlw Vnrkc, r,f Lincoln'- Inn." 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 



233 



t 

I 

( 
a 

li 

li 



the First, as would have induced hiin to preserve silence on 
the flubject. The time when he is said to have made so nar- 
row an escape, was immediately prior to the meeting of the 
, English Parliatnent in 1640. He was liberated upon the 
27th of June thereafter, and instantly returned to Scotland, 
[ carrying despatches from Me King himself, to his covenanting 
I compatriots there. Not a hint then transpired, as the corres- 
I pondence of his most intimate friends, the Reverend Robert 
BaiUie, and Johnston of Warriston, alone suffices to demon- 
etrate, that their favourite leader had just escaped from being 
secretly put to death, in prison, without a liltel and without a 

! trial, by the Sovereign from whom he brought those des- 
patches, and to whom they were so virulently opposed. 
Moreover, in the month of June, as tlie immediate prelimi- 
nary to Loudon's liberation, he wrote with his own hand a 
memorandum for Hamilton (yet preserved in the Hamilton 
archives, among which no record of the alleged tvananl is to 
be found) in terms most respectful and complimentary to the 
King. It refers to various petitions previously presented to 
his Majesty, in behalf of him, Loudon, now in the Tower, by 
reason of the French letter. It excuses that letter upon seve- 
ral grounds ; and in contrite and affectionate terms of loyalty, 
begs the intercession of Hamilton with the King, for " such a 
speedy delivery as may give demonstration to the world of his 
Majesty's j«»(tcc and goodness." Surely there could have been 
no warrant known to Ijoudon, to decapitate him in prison, 
bejifre he had thus memorialized the favourite ; and Burnet 
himself, in his Memoire of the Hamiltons, thus tells us what 
instantly followed : " Upon this the Marquis pressed the King 
much for my Lord Loudon's enlargement, since the Covenan- 
ters made great noise with it in all their complaints, and 
pretended that they durst send up no more commissioners, 
and, therefore, they sent their Acts in the packet. Ho did 
also show his Majesty, that he did know, by the Lieutenant 
of the Tower, that Ijoudou was very fearful ; wherefore he 
desired permission from the King to try what this /ear could 
draw from him ; and to see if his enlargement, with the hopes 
of ft noble reward, could eng^e him to the King's service ; 

I which, if obtained, might prove of great advnntage, since the 



^^ 



234 MKMUHlAIi> OF TlIK 

irritations he bad received would make his advice less sus- 
pected in Scotland : His Majesty approving of this, he treated 
with Loudon, and found him abundantly pliant ; and so, on 
the 26th of June, he agreed with him on these terms, which 
he got under Loudon's hand, in two papers yet extant.* 
These papers are also printed by Burnet, and not a little dis- 
reputable they are to Loudon. He promises his earnest and 
loyal exertions in favour of the King against his own com- 
patriots, and to prevent the Scotch army from convening, or 
crossing the border, — promises which Loudon did not, and 
never could have meant to perform, as his whole conduct 
evinces. " Upon this," proceeds the Bishop, " Loudon was en- 
larged next day (27th June, 1640) and permitted to go down to 
Scotland." Burnet has also printed the reply of the Committee 
of Estates to the King's letter, \sTitten by the Secretary Lane- 
rick, and brought by Loudon himself. The Committee's answer 
is dated 7th July, 1640, and the first sentence of it runs thus : 
" We received your Lordship's letter of the 27th of June from 
the Lord Loudon, whose relief out of prison gives us occasion, 
before we answer your Lordship's letter, to acknowledge the 
same as an act of his Majesty's royal justice and goodness^ al- 
though the pretended cause of his imprisonment was but a 
malicious calumny of the enemies of the King's honour and 
our peace, forged to engage both his Majesty's kingdoms in a 
national war." 

But what of that insane warrant to take Loudon's life in 
prison ? Had he kept his thumb on that fact ? Could such 
a fact have been for ever concealed from " the Brethren,^ and 
left for the histories of the nineteenth century, in the hands 
of Laing, Brodie, and Hallam ? Was the incident not an 
" irritation" to the covenanting Earl which would have caused 
the Covenanters to^make "great noise with it in all their 
complaints" ? Baillie and Warriston were fellow labourers in 
the vineyard with this notorious peer. They, too, were Com- 
missioners from Scotland, on the part of the covenanting 
government. To the enormity in question, not an allusion is 
to be found throughout their volumnious correspondence. No 
trace of it, indeed, has entered contemporary history. Sir 
James Balfour, Bishop Guthry, Spalding, Sir Thomas Hope 






VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



230 



1 his diary), ClureuJou, Whitelock, Saundersou, RuBhwortb, 
I fir Tbomas Warwick, May, HeylJD, Nalson, — are all as aitent 
I en the subject as Baillie and Warriston t The story is 
'Use.'] 

Eccleeiastical affairs in Scotland daily wore a more alarm- 
ing aspect. The people deserting the churches almost entirely 
I'fD many districts, threatened the established clergy with all 
I'Snaaner of violence, so that it was found expedient to put the 
laws against the field preachers and their followers into execu- 
tion. The western counties were particularly turbulent, which 
may be accounted for iu the hereditary disaffection and preaby- 
terianiam of sundry of the principal families who were then 
b Iwpolar and powerful. Of theae, the Dalrymples of Stair were 
I'VTer prominent m the anarchies of refono. As far back as the 
I fifteenth century, Isabel Chalmers, goodwife of Stair, was ar- 
I laigned for heresy ; and duriug the first efforts of Knox, he 
I found the laird of Stair his follower and champion. In later 
I limes, Gralloway had been greatly cornipted by the edifying en- 
Ideavours of Samuel Rutherford, constituted Minister of An- 
I worth by the Lord Kenmure, through the instigattous of his 
llfidy, a violent devotee, and sistor to the Marquis of Argyle. 
I She appears to have been wonderfully smitten with Samuel's 
|i|P^!^, as his rapsodical talents were called, and carried on a 
■«opions correspondence by letter with liim, during his imprison- 
T Blent at Aberdeen, and long after. When the Viscount lay upon 
\his deathbed, this witch of Eudor so terrified liim with the 
fiparitions of Samuel, and his brother divines, that be seems 
Lto have suffered the torments of damnation white yet upon 
' earth. Lord Kenmure then considered his desertions from the 
Parliament of the year 1G33, wliich he left to ingratiate him- 
self with the King, as one of his greatest sins, saying, — " God 
knoweth, I did it with fearful wrestUug of conscience, my 
light paying me home within, when I seemed to be glad and 
joyful before men." The dotard bad forgot that the King was 
weak enough to make him a peer, wonJrously " glad and Joy- 



' ISn this infoinnun oiilunin}', widi wliWb Ur llallniii, irry Grudeljr iiifonned, 

• pollaod hit gnwt work, ilioroughlj' >ift«d, and complrtFl)' ivrui*il, in our 

* MFinoriil* of Mrniimw mil him Timp-," printed for llii- M>ii1»iiil Oiib, vul. ii. 

-tiii., ind RA-lOl. Liing'i tolIiorKiea nrr II i en brought lo IhaUM.) 



230 UMORIAIJS OF THE 

fdl,* that very year. For all Ute otii%r nonaenae whidk ka 
flpoke, and had spoken to him, the reader ia referred to ^ Tha 
last and heavenly speech of John, Viscount of Kenmnre,* and 
the cnrions account of hia sickness and death published in the 
Scotch Worthies. 

The first tumults, on the placing of the Curates in tha 
churches of the expelled ministers, were at Irongray, near 
Dumfries, and at Kirkcudbright ; and though women weia 
the prirvcipal ringleaders, it was well known that the oiker 
sex, had they dared, would have been fully as insolent ; and 
that Lord Kirkcudbright himself was at the bottom of the 
latter riot, though from his rank and connections he escaped 
punishment. 

As it was now thought expedient to send forces into the 
west to ov^erawe the insolence of the rabble and the machina- 
tions of the gentry, the Lords of Privy Council pitched upon 
Sir James Turner to command the troops, a gentleman of 
English extraction, who, during the reign of King Charles the 
First, had been employed to quell the puritanic ddsturbance of 
these very regions. Though the more obstinate whigs were 
severely fined, and soMiers quartered upon them in consider- 
able numbers, nothing could eradicate their prejudices,, or im- 
pede their machinations. The dreadful fire of London, which 
occasioned an universal panic and confusion among all patriots 
and good men, only warmed those wretches, and made the 
froth of their wickedness boil over. Esteeming that juncture 
of dismay most fit for insurrections, they hurried to arms, 
pretending that Turner's barbarity, and more especially the 
binding of an old rogue who refused to discharge Lis fine, was 
the cause of their revolt. Bumety on the best authority, con- 
tradicts the tale of the old man ; and all the dreadful narra« 
tives, respecting lighted matches, whips and flames, are poorly 
authenticated, for we have only the word of whigs for the 
truth of them. Again, though in general mighty particular 
ae to the names of their martyrs, not one fanatic historian I 
have met with, gives the name of this injured old man ; and, 
alas I the women who are said to have been violated by the 
fting^e troops, during the commotions of those times, are in 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



237 



the very eame predicament ; so that perb&pa it may not be 
esteemed too sceptical should we rank the ancient gentleman 
in the same degree of reullty with Sinbad the Sailor's rider, 
ftod the outraged damsels with St Ursula and her nine 
thousand virgins. 

»It is certain, however, that a body of eothusiaste, led on by 
U'Lelland of Barscob, Keilson of Corsack, and others, after 
lianng seized sevexal of the military, and murdered one 
soldier who offered to make resistence, poured down upon 
Dumfries, where Sir James Turner then was, and laid hold 
upon him before he entertained the smallest suspicion of their 
approach. They searched also for the clergyman, but he had 
fled. They secured Turner's papers of every kind, and a con- 
siderable sum of money which bad been transmitted from 
Edinburgh to pay the troops, and collected from persons fined 
for nonconformity. But this treasure they entnisted to the 
onstody of a weak brother, who fled away with the whole of 
it ; such good faith was among the covenanted godly ! Carry- 
ing off Sir James Turner in triumph, they marched to Lanark, 
and there renewed their beloved Sokmn League. Their num- 
bers had now increased to fifteen hundred hor^ and foot, 
commanded by the lairds already mentioned, together with ft 
Colonel Wallace, a Colonel Grey, Major Ijcarmont (originally 
a Tailor, which Wodrow will not allow), and some othem. 
Hearing that General Thomas Dalyell approached with troops, 
they resolved to continue at Lanark, supposing that the Gene* 
ral would find it almost impracticable to paM the Clyde 
swelled with the rains, and hoping for reinforcements from 
different quarters. But a letter from Hir James Stewart 
altered their plans ; and through mire and snow they proceeded 
to CoUington. Ready to cut each others throat«, and half 
dead with cold and fatigue they approached Edinburgh. By 
desertion their number waa now roduce'l to eight hundred 
men, with nothing to resist hunger and despair but fury and 
the Covenant. The gat*s of Edinburgh were so utriclly 
guarded that none of their friends could issae oat to comfort 
them. In this dilemma, attempting to retreat thnragh the 
Pentland hills, they were awailed by their evil senins Oeoeral 



238 



SlF.MORlAl^ 0¥ THK 



reached them iii the evening of 8 clear and sunny day. The 
whigs encouraged themselves by singing the 74th and 78th 
Psalms, while drawn up in battle array. One of tlieir troops, 
commanded by M'CIelLind of Bannaghew, and Crobkshanks, 
at first repulsed a party of the Royal Army, commanded by i 
Brummond ; and lu this skirmish Duke Unmilton was nearly 
slain by a blow from a cudgel of the Covenant. But the whole | 
body of the rebels was quickly put to the rout, aud greatly. ■ 
indebted to the shades of night, but more to the commiser&- J 
tion of the King's troops, that not above fifty were destroyed, f 
A hundred and thirty were taken in the pursuit ; and several I 
were despatched by the inhabitauts of the vicinity, untainteci, 
as it would appear, by the prevailing systems of disloyalty. 
But what is still more wonderful, all the misery which those 
deluded wretches endured, appeared but nugatory in the eyes 
of their nefarious pastors. Sometime after this disaster, Maa 
Richard Cameron, one of their preachers, exclaimed at i 
western conventicle; — "0 sad to think upon the west of 
Scotland 1 I know no place wherein more \vill go to hell than 
in the west of Scotland. The wild Highlands have not sitten 
so many calls as thou hast done. I would not have the 
accoinpts on my head, that you professors in Clydesdale, Ayr, 
Galloway, and Tweedale, have, for all the world." The Arch- 
bishop, in the absence of Rotbes aud Lauderdale, the latter of 
whom, if he did not actually foment the insurrection, heartily 
rejoiced at it as a meaus of getting Scotland still more into 
his power, gave all the necessary orders respecting the motions 
of the troops ; and it is worthy of remark, that this wise pre^ 
late returned no answer to an offer made to the Council by 
the Earl of Argyle, who had raised fifteen hundred men, — • 
of his services during the rebellion. The Archbishop was 
convinced that were Argyle to descend from the Highlands 
with his troops, either the leader, or the men, or both, would 
most certainly join the rebels. 

General Dalyell, the son of Thomas Dalycll of Biuns, was 

bom about 1599. At an early period of life he adopted the 
militarj' profession , and adhered to the cause of Charles I, Ha ' 
commanded at Carrickfergus in Ireland, and was there taken 



iteft 



VISCODN'T or DUNDEE. 

(ttieoDer. 1650. Again, 1651, he was taken prisoner rI the 
bftttle of Worcester, ami carried to the Tower, from whence 
he escaped ; after which his estates were forfeited, and himself 
exempted from the general act of indemnity. Charles the 
Second recommended Uulyell, for his eminent courage and 
fidelity, t« Prince Radzivil, the King of Poland, and other 
foreign dignitaries, in the years 1G55 and 1650. The Czar of 
Muscovy, Alexis Michaelovitch, under whose banner he fought 
courageously against the Turks and Tartars, for his great 
ravery and military conduct promoted him to the rank of 
■General, and on his return to Scotland, ordered a testimony of 
, in the most honourable terms, to pass the Great 
' He was bred up very hardy from his youth," says 
/ftptain Creichton, " both in diet and clothing : He never wore 
►ots, nor above one coat, which was close to his body, with 
■Cloee sleeves, like those we call jockey-coals : He never wore 
mH peruke, nor did he shave hia beard since the murder of King 
' Charles I. In my time his head was bald, which he covered 
only with a beaver hat, the brim of which was not above three 
inches broad ; His beard was white and bushy, and yet reach- 
ed down almost to his girdle : He usually went to London once 
or twice a-year, and then only to kiss the King's hand, who 
hftd a great esteem for his worth and valour. His unusual 
dress and figure, when ho was in London, never failed to draw 
after him a great crowd of boys, and other young people, who 
constantly attended at his lodgings, and followed him with 
hvaas as he went to Court, or returned from it. As he was a 
man of humour,lie would always thank them for their civilities, 
vhen he left them at the door U) go into the King, and would 
let them know emctttf at what hotir he intended to come out 
again, and return to his lodgings. Whiu the King walked in 
the Park, attended by some of hia courtiers, and Dulyell in 
his company, the same crowds would always be al'ter him, 
showing their admiration of his beard and dress, so that the 
King could hardly pa«iB on for the crowd ; npon which hia 
Hajesty bid the devil take Dal^eU, for bringing such a rabble 
of boys to have their <jtita squeezed out. while ihey gaped at his 
long heard and antic habit, rrjqueeting him at tlie same time 
(an Dalyell used to exprena it) to shave, and ilreas like other 



240 



UEUORIAI^ OF THK 



Christiana, to keep the poor baima out of danger : All Uiis 
could never prevail on him to part vHh his beard ; hut yet, in 
compliance to bis Majesty, he went once to Coiirt in the very 
height of the /aahion; but as soon as the King, and tho&e 
about him, had laughed Bufiiciently at the Btrange figure h» 
made, he re-assumed his usual habit, to the great Joy 0/ the 
hoys, who had not discovered him in his fashionable dress." 
The accusation of being a wizard, Dalyell shared with almost 
all the active loyalists of his time ; whom, however, if we can 
trust the author of " Grod's Judgments," ho so far exceeded in 
" devilish sophistry, that he sometimes beguiled the Devil, or 
rather his master suffered himself to bo outwitted by him," 
He has also been denounced as a person of manners singularly 
rude and brutal, chiefiy because, at an examination of whiga 
before the Privy Council, b© struck one Gamock — who had 
railed against him as " a Muacovie beast tliat roasted men" — 
with the pommel of bis sword, till the blood sprang. But it 
should be remembered that soldiers are not wont to bear such 
epithets tamely. " By my troth, captain, these are very 
bitter words!" And, moreover, at that period, a liberality in 
bestowing of blows was practised by the liigher ranks towards 
their inferiors, now scarcely credible. In almost every comedy 
of that age, the fine gentleman, as he is called, beatti his valet- 
de-chambre, and generally his whole household, whenever a 
fit of ill-humour incites him to exercise his cane ; and this 
brutality must have commonly prevailed, else it would not 
have been suffered on the stage.' 

The day after the battle of Pentland, the prisoners wero 
escorted into Edinburgh by Dalyell's troops, with banners dis- 
played, and shouts of victory, to the rage and sorrow of the 
whigs. Nay, as they passed through the suburbs, where one 
Mr Arthur Murray, an ejected minister, dwelt, he looked from 
his window upon (he procession, and going immediately in a 
pet to bed, actually yielded up his indignant ghost. The re- 
bels were secured in that part of St Giles's Church called 



I 
I 



' (We ihill find Bome very cliaracwrislio ti 
irded hy ClKverhouse (who RufTered itiucli vex 
hii oorreqwodeaee, eonUitnd is ■ Bulmque 



k 



VISCODNT OF DDNDEK. 



241 



i 



Haddo'a Hole, from Sir John Gordon of Haddo (father of the 
first Earl of Aberdeen), who, for his loyalty, was there confined 
by the C'ovenaut«r6, previous to his cruel execution. They 
were treated with much lenity, the Bishop of Edinburgh 
(Wishart) daily sending tliem liberal supplies at his own ex- 
pense, as aware, from experience, of the miseries attending in- 
carceration. The Covenanters (when in the ascendant) hating 
this good man as the chaplain of Montrose, and an enemy to 
their principles, confined him for seven months in a dark 
noisome dungeon, and in that time allowed him a change of 
linen only once, so that he was almost devoured by vermin ; 
and also by rats, which attaclccd liis face so voraciously, that 
he bore the marks of them to his death. 

Several of the whigs were tried and executed, who might 
have preserved their lives by rcnounciug the Solemn League. 
Of these, Hugh M'Kail, a young preacher, and a very comely 
graceful person (according to Wodrow), excited much com- 
miseration, especially among the fair sex, whose natural ten- 
derness of heart is greatly increased by the influence of mas- 
culine beauty. He was suspected of knowing secrets regard- 
ing the share which the whig party in England had in the late 
motions of their Scottish friends, and was put into the boots 
to extort a confession. But a man who will not renounce the 
Covenant to save his life, will hardly reveal a secret to protect 
his leg,' and M'Kail remained obstinate. Ncilson of Corsock 
was tortured at the same time. They were examined by 
Rothes. Kirkton says, " the executioner favoured Mr M'Kail, 
but Corsock was cruelly tormented, and acreiijht fur puin, (w 
as to have moved a heart of stone." But, by his account, it 
did not move that of Uothes, who called frc'iuently for " tlie 
other touch," that is, another blow on the wedge.* Corsock 
was an old rogue, M'Kail a young I'ool, and Hotlies know 

' [Mr Murp* wiK li<>n? moTv iotenc upon hi* antitlieiis, than thn ■oundoea oThU 
pnpoaltliiii. The ditud uf tnrtare is grolcr than tiio fc^r of de«lh, or that tilo 
nminUcnnoa at our criminal Juriiiinidoniv, pnilaDgHl by King WltlUni blmwir 
into the rra of tha Revolution, •nuM ncvor havg difgraccil iJin cuuolry.] 

* [ Bui it mui ever l» licpt in mltid, that lb* tBuatical venlnn u( mr\\ iMnM, 
roeorded b; Kirkton, and chranif lori of that wunp, ar* Urn Iw*! to be tnuted of 
■II vrltten eridcDce. Ituthe* wm humane, — not aatage lilia Laud«rdale. E*od 
Wodrow wa* uttcrij' rreanlln* cf faimeai arul tnilb in hta nwrtjrolngio*.] 



Hi 



i 



242 mi:mokiai.s of the 

well how to distinguish persons. After some other severities, 
which had very little effect, the army was withdrawn from 
the western shires, and affairs wore a milder aspect, till an 
attempt upon the life of the Primate once more gave the 
alarm, and convinced all unprejudiced persons, that every 
species of conciliation was completely wasted on the fanatics. 
This crime was meditated by James Mitchell, a wretch who 
had studied divinity, or rather devilry^ under Mr James Dick- 
son, but, on attempting to take orders in the Presbyterian 
fashion, was rejected by the Presl)ytery of Dalkeith for igno- 
rance. This " weak scholar," as even Kirkton confesses him to 
have been, then got into the household of the Laird of Dun- 
das, w^here he held the office of pedagogue to the children (a 
pretty pedagogTie), and chaplain to their parents. But falling 
in love with a young woman, wife to the ancient gardener of 
Dundas, he contrived to gain her good graces so thoroughly 
that she paid him a nightly visit in his bed-chamber, a kind of 
summer-house, built upon the garden wall. The other ser- 
vants of the house, observing this little intrigue, one night 
turned the key upon the lovers, and then informed their 
master of the whole affair. Meanwhile, after a convenient 
space, Dulcinea must begone. But lo I the door is fast. Mr 
James having considered on the most proper course, whips off 
his shirt, and, the lady holding the end of it, lowers her down 
to the ground. But his master, seeing him " like a filthy 
garden-god upon the wall," without a rag to conceal his sins, 
turns him out of the house in all the disgrace imaginable. 
Mitchell then repaired to Edinburgh, and for some years re- 
sided in the Cowgate, in the house of one Grissel Whiteford, — 
the whig historians for the more grace style her Mistress, — 
where he enjoyed the edifying company of the celebrated 
Major Weir, his fellow-lodger, of whom more by-and-bye. 
Having joined the Pentland insurrection, he fled to Flanders ; 
but returning sometime after to Scotland, resolved to realize 
what had already had been predicted by sundry Presbyterian 
oracles, and assassinate the Archbishop of St. Andrews. On 
Saturday, the 11th of July 1668, while the Primate was seat- 
ed in his coacli at the head of Blackfriars Wynd in Edinburgh, 
blessing the people passing by (according to the fashion of the 



VISfOtINT OF DLNnKi;. 



243 



I* 



times), Milchcll discharged at him a pistol IfiadoJ with three 
balls. But Honeymau, Bishop of Orkney, at that motnent 
entering the carriage, received the shot in his arm, which was 
so dreadfully mangled, that, after languishing for some years, 
he died, iji consequence of the wound. In the confusion in- 
cident to an attempt of this nature, James Mitchell made off 
and escaped ; but was taken a long time after, and brought to 
trial He was a lean hollow cheeked man, says Dr Hicks;' 
and, though on a promise of his life, be hud confessed his guilt 
to the Lords of Privy Council, yet, through a fear of having 
his hands cut oW, oa is alleged, he thought fit to deny all 
again liefore the Lords of Justiciary, Upon this, the Privy 
Council retracted their promise, chiefly granted for the sake 
of discovering liis accomplices, as his own part of the crime 
could easily he proven, and linally had him hanged. This has 
been termed a base action in the Council ; but the FuritEins 
had taught people of all persuasions to be subtle casuists, and, 
no doubt, the Lords reconciled their conduct to their con- 
sciences. This villain appeared at the bar with a powdered 
periwig, and a brazen face ; for it is quite wonderful to consi- 
der with what assurance he latterly persisted in his denial, 
and with what insolence he Iwhaved to the Council. Mr 
Charles Iklaitland of Hatton, Lord Treasurer Depute, told him 
that be was one of the most arrogant cheats, liars, and rogues 
that he had ever bebeld. In a letter written after his sen- 
tence, he left his ttstiiwmy against, and abhorrence of, " Balls, 
bordoUes, mountebanks, acts of comedies, festival days, viz. 
at Yule and Pent«co8t, which are all the product of a profane 
and perfidious clergy, all of them being instigated by8utan, as 



^^_ lion 



' [Tb< account of Ihi* vill*iu, wbn »■■ eluvaifij \iy Hi* nnlul* U) tli 
bccAiua bis Tillutj' took tliu Uim uf tniirderliig Hitliupii, ww pubilaJxil *o cu-ljr m 
l<i7B, in " RavilUe Rwliviviu," MiJ In be hj Ur llick» ; ■ nuuw. pi'rfarmancr 
(having Tcry Fiwr« matter tu cl«al witli], but iliu Inilli uf *lircli there ia no rtaaoii 
tu iluubt. Tho roinuM ilnlmilii h* r«n>rd>>, in tl>v vpry veur of Mitnhell'i eiwmtion, 
war* BDt of ft nature to )•■ in*ufit*il by ■ c(Mitnn|>urar}', (wiin cmld Iwve bera tanl} 
dotHtlnl,) anil moat liara bwo nnUirioaaal tlie \\iar. Thi-)- ar« CTmbrmiMl in ninir 
nefwota by the ailniiMuua of tlin ranatiml wrili-n lln^mwlven, wlin» onl; drfmM 
of Hilahrti cunidatB in blaLinl Hboae of hi* juitgi'^ Bad ibcir blarptiemoti* uantnf- 
lion that hr *tr\ti unitrr a diiinr iapolt*, or mU, to prfunn " ttir wnrk of nwl," 



•>rin 



'l 



2 U MUMORI ALS or THE 

fitte«l instruments for erecting and stirring up of lust to thia 
apostati3 and rebellious generation against God, his truth. 
Covenant, and people, and cause." 

Jarnes, after\vards Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees, in a Tery 
tedious and treasonable book which he called Jus Populi Vin- 
dicafum, printed in 1669, talking of Fhineas's exploit, lavishes 
a quantity of ill-written abuse on Bishop Honeyman, alleging 
that he became captious " from his green w^ound," which he 
got " per acctJens, because of ill-company," — and so had written 
an answer to Napthali, another such edifying Christian tract 
as this of Jxc8 Populi. They were both long the text-books of 
the zealots. Indeed Sir James Stewart himself wrote part of 
Napthali. 

James Mitchell, a man such as I have described, who would 
make no mean figure in the Newgate Kalendar, was placed by 
the Covenanters in their list of Martyrs ; and about two years 
after his attempt, tlicy might have added another, who seems 
only to have missed that distinction by never attempting to 
commit violence on an established clergyman. 

I allude to Mitchell's friend, the noted Major Weir. He 
had been a vehement reformer of the meaner sort during the 
Civil Wars, and having for some time commanded the Town 
Guard of Edinburgh, was dignified with the title of Major, 
On the Marquis of Montrose's imprisonment, previous to his 
murder. Weir was shut up with him in his cell, as a sort of 
keeper, and employed to smoke tobacco without cessation, the 
effluvia of which was very offensive to the noble captive. But 
not contented with that indignity, he loaded him with the 
bitterest reproaches that malice could devise, or a tongue of 
wonderful nimbleness utter. His fluency in exhortation and 
prayer was prodigious ; which, together with his constancy 
to the Covenant, made him be in great request among the 
enthusiasts, after the Restoration. The pious burghers of 
Edinburgh wooed him from house to house, to ejaculate his 
edifying effusions, and their wives could get little comfort in 
prayer without the assistance of Major Weir. At the age of 
8eventy,bowed down with years andpenury,did this old monster 
repair to the Magistrates of Edinburgh, and make a confession 
of crimes that cannot be particularized. In his relations, false- 



4 



TISCOl'NT OF DUNDEE. 



24 ■> 



1 

I 



Iiood was miugied with truth. Amid many favours obtained 
from corporeal demons, Le boasted those of the Devil tmder 
the shape of & fair young lady, and nurraled a prodi^poufl 
series of sorcery in which his sister Jean, who resided in the 
same house, and was nearly as aged as Iiimself, l>ore a di»- 
tinguisliod part. Tliey were both executed for tlieir crimoa. 
The Major, with his conjuring staff, burnt on Leith Walk ; 
and Jean hanged in the Grassmarket of Edinburgh. At her 
execution, amid all the horrors of a troubled conscience, and 
a violent death, her fond remembrance of the Solemn League 
and Covenant is extremely remarkable, and recorded by Mr 
Sinclair,' ■ft-ith a simplicity very suitable to the circumstance, 
" In the morning before her execution," says this Professor 
of Natural Philosophy, " she told the minister she resolved to 
die with all the aflame she could, to expiate under mercy her 
shameful life: Ascending the ladder, she spoke somewhat 
confusedly of her sins, of her brother and his enchanting staff, 
and with a ghastly countenance, beholding a multitude of 
spectators all wondering, and some weeping, she sjwke aloud, — 
• there are many here this day wondering and greeting for me, 
but, alas 1 few mourn for a broken Covenant ;' at which words 
many seemed angry ; some called to her to mind higher con- 
cerns ; and, I have heard it said, that the preacher declared 
he bad much ado to keep a com^>oeed countenance. The exe- 
cutioner falling about liis duty, she prepared to die stark 
nuked! Then, and not before, wore her words relating to 
«Jta7ne understood. The hangman struggled with her to keep 
oQ her clothes, and she struggled with him to have them off. 
At liifit ho was forced U\ throw hor over open-factd, which af- 
terwards he covered with a cloth."* This happened in the 
month of April 1670. 

It was at length deemed expedient, in the year IfiG!), that 
an indulgence should be granted to the whigs ; that several 
of their preachers should Ito placed in as many churches as 



[Mr ncorsa Slnrlnlr, Prar«r«i>r at rhiliMophy in tlie Cnllpge of Glugn«, in lii* 
» Sktsno laviollito Wnrid Uiwarvd.") 

[The lul dTurl ut th<> wrrtdu^ orealan wu In lliniat I»t hnd botorvn iiro 
«l*)M of tb* gallowt ladiliT, rn4n whJcli Ketch luil wiiiio iliffionlii in eitrimine i' ) 



240 MEMUKIAI-S OF TUE 

were vacant, and twenty pounds sterling a-year settled on the 
rest, till opportunities of providing for them occurred. Of the 
sons of Belial who were ottered the pension, not a soul accepted 
it, esteeming it a bril»o to be silent on topics which alone ren- 
dered their conventicles much more lucrative. But forty 
ejected ministers had the condescension to occupy churches, 
after being expressly prohibited from preaching out of doors, 
or meddling, in their discourses, with civil att^airs and eccle- 
siastical government. This was certainly a cruel restriction, 
seeing that these y)ersons had been accustomed to consider, 
and declaim upon, such subjects alone, and were wretchedly 
ignorant in respect of morality and the principles of religion. 
But the learned whigs quickly found themselves in the same 
predicament with the curates. The people preferred treason 
in the open air to tnith under cover ; and more than ever fre- 
quented the field conventicles, at which resistance to every 
human poicer, but that of the Kirk, and the most bloody ven- 
geance, against all its persecutors, were inculcated as meri- 
torious in the sight of God, if not absolutely necessary to- 
wards salvation. 

The reader is referred to Bishop Burnet for a more particu- 
lar account of the further concessions made, and the wonderful 
eflronterj' with which they were rejected. Lauderdale, who 
for a while was smoothed down to gentle courses, partly 
through the persuasion of his friends, and partly to mortify 
the Archbishop of St Andrews, whom he supposed such nego- 
tiations and indulgencies would gall, at length lost all patience. 
He procured severe acts against conventicles to be passed, 
which not only rendered the landlords, on whose grounds they 
were held, liable to large fines, but authorised heavy punish- 
ments on those who attended tliem, and on the ministers them- 
selves. This, as he had long retained the leaven of the Cove- 
nant in his own bosom, was also in a great measure attributed 
to tlie influence of liis wife, a woman every w^ay extraordinary 
and matchless.* 

' [TIiu idea tiiat to tliiii or that iniliviUual Btatesinan, or to the *' influence of his 
wife," in to be attributed what has been called *< severe aets against conyenticles,*' 
we believe to be a fanciful modern Kpeculation. The beau ideal of a Scotch con- 
Vifiiticlo is something wry different from the coai*8e and dangerous I'ealif^ with 



/ 



VISWUNT OF DUNDEE. 



247 



She was the dauglitcr of William Murniy, stm yf the neodj 
miatater of Dysart, aad uephew of Charles the First's peda- 
gogue, who got bis relative placed ahoiit his piii>il in the 
station of page, and whipping boy, a creature to he beaten 
wheDever tho Prince was uaughty, in order to scare him with 
the sight of puiiiBhment. As the King is said to have heen 
a veryj'rowaid child, young Murray would suilVr lu propor- 
tion i and it is to be presumed, that his flagellations obtained 
the gratitude of his master, whose favour he oujoyed during a 
long train of treachery, in which ho extorted forty tbousand 
inerks from Parliament for betraying hia benefactor's secrets. 
At last be procured the patent of au Earldom, which was 
really signed at Newcastle, though he prevailed with the King 
to antedate it, that he might enjoy precedence over some ptT- 
sona whom be bated, being beyoud measure luiilicious and re- 
vengeful. But this pateut did not pass under the Great Sea! 
till after Cbiirles'a death, bo that in reality it was good for 
nothing. This egregious knave was he who sent advertise- 
ment to the Governor of Hull, advisiug him as a friend not to 
admit the King, as he was resolved, if master of the town, to 
secure biin, and cut off his bcail. He married Elizahctb Bruce, 
of the Clackmannan family, and by her bad two daughters, of 
whom, the eldesi, aftorwardft Duchess of Lauderdale, was 
wedded to Sir Ijiouel Talmash of Rnfi'olk, and, at her Xather's 
death, assumed the title of Uysart, 

"^^-iilieftas a woman of beauty, and vast abilities. Her quick- 
iieBs orappwUiensiou, and her vivacity of wit, wore prothgious ; 
and Xo these gifftof nature, eho added a fund of literature, 
which, even in this ago of le^imedladiea, wonhl l>e esteemed 
imcommon ; for she not only understood dignity, history, and 
philosophy, but oven mathematics. With all these advantages 
she wast totally devoid of principle, and so outrageously covel- 
nua, that lior hunger of ricbe-8 couUl never Ite satiated. During 
th<! life of her first husband she was intimate with Laurlerdale, 

«lilch tbr gnvsninwiilof Charlw tlw SmooiI hid to dnl. How, at this iky, would 
iliK Miaur«li)r iiT Kagtand dni aiih Inland under ■imllar ciminuUDco^ If a iimt* 
diqiw of aniliidiiua primia, vvn- ilninuiiuilf ^rainininii iwuluiiaii In Qtui'di and 
Sblta UinniRluiul llie Ktiipiip, bj iiimii* of Hidi iii>iitii>«-»t> ao K>u»li>% priimd 
I coiiirnllrii'* fur tlmt paTfiaf l| 




248 MEMORIALS OF THE 

and subsequently persuaded liim that she had saved his life, 
after Worcester fight, through her influence with Cromwell ; 
who also was her admirer, and, if report erred not, had little 
reason to complain of her cruelty. But Oliver broke oflf his 
own intrigue, when the scandal of it found circulation, through 
the same principle which made him always visit General 
Lambert's ^vife with the Bible under his arm. It is probable 
enough that he made Lady Dysart a present of Lauderdale's 
life, for it was no uncommon thing with him to dispose of his 
captives to ladies. Walker tells us, that after the battle of 
Dunbar a thousand of the wounded men were, " in a gallantry," 
sent by Cromwell to Elizabeth, Countess of Winton, daughter 
of John Lord Ilerris. Voltaire asserts, that Lambert's wife 
loved Lord Holland (the reputed favourite of Henrietta Maria), 
" qui servait dans I'armee du Roi : Cromwell le prend prison- 
nier dans une battaille, et juoit du plaisir de faire trancher la 
t^te a son rival." After the Restoration, Lady Dysart imagined 
that Lauderdale did not appear sufficiently grateful for past 
favours, and a suspension of all intercourse took place during 
some years. But her husband's death reconciled the lovers, 
whose intimacy became so scandalous, that Lauderdale's wife, 
a daughter of Lord Home, could no longer endure the indig- 
nity, but retired to Paris, where she died, leaving one daughter, 
afterwapds married to the Earl of Tweeddale, then Lord 
Tester ; — " a spcndid glorious marriage at Court," says Kirk- 
ton, " the King himself leading the bride uncovered to the 
church." Lady Dysart in process of time persuaded her para- 
mour to make her an honest woman, and gained so complete 
an ascendancy, that she contrived to incite him to quarrel with 
all his oldest and best friends, among the rest, with Sir Robert 
Murray (whom her father had fixed upon as a husband for 
her), by pretending that he everj^vhere gave himself the credit 
of governing Lauderdale. \Vhen the Earl achieved the su- 
preme command of Scotland, she came down to that astonish- 
ed country in great pomp, and conducted herself with such 
overweening insolence, that she might have been mistaken for 
hereditary Princess of the three kingdoms, instead of grand- 
daugliter to the low-born minister of Dysart. She talked with 
unbounded licence of every body; set up all places in the 



\ 



VISCOUNT UF DUNDEE. 249 

Scottinli governtueiit to sale, with as little shame as cheapness ', 
and levied contributions wherever she went. She, " in great 
wrath," even publicly threatened tho Magistrates of Edinburgh 
for not giving her a present, notwithstundiug of all the good 
she said that she hud done to them ; though her favours were 
not very obvious, and the Town Council had digposod of ahout 
seventeen thousand pounds sterling between her husband and 
his creatures. Of two daughters, whom she had by her first 
spotise, Kirkton says, — " she thought she might make a better 
market in Scotland than in England ; otic of them she thought 
to have matched to the Lord Murray, the heir to the Marquis 
of Athole, my Lady's chief, whom she had so much engaged ; 
but the proposal was rejected, which made her turn her friend- 
ship into hatred and threatenings ; however, one daughter 
she married ta Argyle's heir (which was a most unhappy mar- 
riage), and another to the Earl of Murray, and so she got her 
businosB done in her noble manner." The whole tenor of her 
conduct has no parallel in Scottish history. 

The standing forces in Scotland had been dispersed at the 
Restoration ; and, in the year 1674, the military power con- 
sisted only of one troop of horse-giiards, commanded by the 
Marquis of Athole, and one regiment of foot-guards, under the 
Earl of Linlithgow. The Presbyterian disturbances demand- 
ing a greater force, the King was induced to make the addi- 
tions mentioned before, and, about the same time, it was 
thought expedient that a body of Highlanders, under the com- 
mand of the Lords Athole, Murray, Caithness, Perth, Strath- 
more, and Airly, together with Linlithgow's troop, should be 
showered upon the western shires, to improve their sterile 
loyalty. Tho Hi(i;hlandnien, after l>eing led through Clydes- 
dale, Itenfrewshiro, Cunningham, Kyle, and Carrick, were 
withdrun-it, exhibiting in a wonderful degrL-o the more humane 
characteristics of those simple mountuincers. Neither the 
honour of the lowland women, nor tho hvos of the men, were 
destroyed in a single instance, ovi-n iift*r one of the band had 
been murdered by a Presbyterian, in defence of his house, 
which his principles had made liable to he plundered. 

<'aptHin rirnhain nC riiiviTlmiiMi', shortly uftcr his promo- 



250 MKMORIAIJS OF TUE 

tion, was ordered with his troop into Galloway, whither 
" the Highland Host" had not extended, to suppress the inso- 
lency of the inhahitants. Convinced that severity was the 
only caustic proper for such boils, he quartered his men upon 
the refractory, and, by fining, attempted to reduce them to 
obedience. But his efforts at that time were crowned with 
slender success. The plirenzy of covenants, conspiracies, and 
commotion, again inflated tlie vulgar. Disguising themselves, 
and, in the night, thoy entered by force the houses of the 
Episcopal clergy, to boat and abuse their wives and themselves. 
Tht y rofiisod to pay the Cess, or tax levied by Government for 
supiK>rt of the army. The lowest strumpets and vagabonds 
Kwuno skilful in iK»lomical controversy. The shepherds dis- 
cussed tvolosiasiical abuses, like those of Spencer in the Sep- 
i^'UiIht of his Kt'K>guos ; and to such a pitch was enthusiasm 
oxaliod, that the very hangman grew metaphysical, and re- 
lus<\l to oxoouto rebels. For this obstinacy, William Suther- 
land, the Kitch of Irvine, was seated by Kothes in the stocks, 
when' ho do scant ovl, to the ailmiration of his hearers, on the 
jfi\^- tyu'cs [XsMv^ trains'^ of the bishops, saying, — " How know 
vo but t!io l.v^rvl hath revealed more to me than to your 
I'-.slio^'S with ihoir side tails?" 

riu' sv\oriry of Olavorhouso in the west, is prodigiously 
o\.-C:^\v;»tovl by tho pious AWnirow, whose huge chronicle, 
,v»vi\\M\l of narraiions furnished by the Presbyterians them- 
M'I\xx. I-.ko our nu^K ru pooracos, is a mass of tiresome false- 
li.vxl iliouiih iho founiainhoad from which succeeding whig 
\\nioi-^ha\o iuiMlvd thoir waters of bitt^rness.^ Yet, with 
M I ho tvxoivuvl gvssip's disingonuity, after a declamation re- 
sjvoitui; Kubannis oruolty, and 1 know not what, we aresome- 
\\b„a i^^l^M\lshovl iv* tind tho philippic founded on such a cir- 
,'uu\^t;u\oo as this: *' dauios," — it should be John, — " Graham 
of rlaxors. with a uuniorous party of soldiers, came andquar- 
toivd ujsMi iJillvrt MMoikon, in New Glenluce parish, for a 
^'vsni many days, without paying any tiling; and when they 

StwinH* ^*^^ form**** * |H?rfoctly just estimate of Wwlrow, as we have illus- 
^ lS»ri I of ihoiK* MviMorialR. It is curious to ww the blunder, is to tho 
li,»hsl »« f iiau^rh- u^o, whioh Mr Sharpo had obMJivcd in Wodrow, cro|>- 

1 Uvimwu '^1*^/' ^^^^^^ j^^.|, ^nU pn»lifi*- «»i*t»«i«- «w»l «•« I-<"d MacaulavV] 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



2D1 



I 



'went off, though they had cousumed leu times the value of 
the cesB (tax), they carried with them three horses worth teu 
pounds sterling" ! I ! John iVrroU, who eommauded the party, 
contiuues the reverend author with triumph, " was killed next 
year at Dnimclog, and had Lis bowels trod out by a horse," a 
Judgment upon him for carrying away Gilbert's three foundered 
jades, we may all be very certain. 

In the month of March 1679, the Privy Council, finding 
the fanatic disorders rather increase than diminish, resolved 
.' to nominate Sheriffs Depute for sundry of the shires, and re- 
hired writs of deputation from the Sheriffs principal to con- 
firm them in their posts. Captain Graliam, and Captain An- 
drew Bruce of Earlsball, were constituted Sheriffs Depute of 
Dumfries, Wigton, and the Stewartrics of Annandale and 
Kirkcudbright ; by no means to the satisfaction of William, 
Earl (afterwiirds Duke) of Queeusberry, the Sheriff of Dum- 
friesshire, who seems to have disliked Qraham exceedingly ;> 
in all probability because his reputation was becoming bril- 
liant, and Queenshorry could endure no active partner in the 
government of that portion of Scotland. 

Queensberry was a man of great genius, unimproved, as it 
would appear, by literature. A favourite at Court, the mea- 
sures of which he strenuously promoted, yet he at last shrunk 
buck from the fatal folhes of King James.^ He attained signal 
bonoiu-s, and a prodigious estate. His violent and dictatorial 
temper made him obnoxious to many persons of his own rank, 
uid hated by the vulgar, who, after his exertions in repressing 
oonvcnticles, and apprehending whigs, gave him the nick- 
name of " The Deil o' Drumlanrig," similar to that bestowed 
upon Philip II, of Spain, who was termed " Uvmon Meri- 
dianua" the Ueil of the South. With all his immense riches, 
Queensberry was attentive to the shghtest articles of expen- 
diture in hia houseliold, and constantly canting about being 

' [QuHntborr; vm *xtr«niel;f jwlous of tlic ritiDg Cl>»rhaiiiw, bui ytt hnld 
bim In IiikIi MWem. KnawiiigtlM vsluauf lii* ibili lit* anil eiici^j' lo ihe royml oiur, 
be greatly promolcil liia advuMcnienL Had Mr 8lur]ia teun Ihc onrnMiHiiiiUec* 
wa arenuw eiMblnl to priHluea, ho would Imvamndilicd ihn cxprmaioii llmt UiiM-nn- 
hurry '• ilmtlkiHl Uraluiu emmilinKl^.''] 

• [(tu»<»l»ri-. .l.-wrv,. ur<Mi nvM hr (lii- ■- oliriiikii'K b.ick." ..■• or olull 

li...l ] 



252 MEMORIALS OF THE 

cheated, while lie himself was attempting to overreach all his 
neighbours. His wife, a daughter of the Marquis of Douglas, 
lived on the worst terms imaginable with him. He would 
neither allow her command of the servants, pin-money, or 
wine, of which last article her Grace appears to have been 
somewhat fond. In a piteous letter to the Laird of Dornock, 
she says, — " And now, I declare to you, that I have not at this 
time one farthing ; neither do I know how to get it, seeing I 
find nothing in the instructions for it. I have lately got from 
Mr John Richardson six dollars, but have bestowed it all upon 
things for my daughter, and some small things for myself ; 
and you know that I cannot want [do without] some money 
to do any little business with, — if it were to send for the 
doctor, or any other little account. So pray let me know what 
I shall do during the time I am to stay here. Let me have your 
advice, with the first, or else some money, for it is not possible 
I can want The wine is very ill here [Edinburgh], and is 
prejudicial for my health ; and, therefore, it is very hard that 
my Lord will not send me in some of his. Pray speak to hin> 
in this, for this wine does me a great deal of hurt." 

In another epistle to the same gentleman, she says, — " Tell 
my Lord I must buy linen for a gown, which will cost about 
three or four pounds sterling, and see if he will send it. I 
have changed one of my gowns into a night manteau, and am 
necessitat to make up another. I keep not my health well ; 
which I impute to the ill wine that is here ; the wine that 
William Douglas gave me is turned sourish, that I can hardly 
drink it ; pray, see if my Lord will let me have any of his for 
my health." Queensberry had also many quarrels with his son, 
Lord Drumlanrig ; while, on the other hand, Lady Drumlanrig 
and her sister. Lady Anno, were at deadly feud. But the whole 
family seemed most attentive to economy ; and the Duke's 
sister. Lady Margaret Jardine, carried love of money to a 
pitch scarcely credible. Though married to an opulent Baro- 
net, she would, for a halfpenny, bear people on her shoulders 
across the river Annan, which flows near the wall of her 
spouse's mansion ; and when there was a fair, or a field preach- 
ing in the neighbourhood, would sit on the banks of the 
stream the whole day in expectation of cu8tt»mer8. She gene- 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNUEE. 253 

rally wore raga ; but carried, when visiting, articles of finery 
in a napkin, which she would slip on before she entered the 
house. Her head gear of ceremony sLe called her Cachipe.^ 

Queenaberry, however unwilling, was compelled to grant 
Captain Graham of Claverhouse his deputation ; which is sub- 
joined from a draught in my possession that has neither been 
filled up nor signed.* The first occasion of offence given by 
Graham to the Earl seems to have been respecting locality, or 
the proportion of provender which was to be furuished to his 
troops of horse and dragoons from certain parishes in Dum- 
friesshire. On this subject, he thus writes to one of his con- 
fidential managers, Mr Sliarpe, then in Dumfries : — " Sanquhar, 
22d April 1679. — Loving friend. 1 got not hero till Sun- 
day night, else ye liad heard from me before this. All I am 
now to say is, that since I came home, I have seen some 
very peremptory, and, as I conceive, illegitl orders from 
Claverhouse anent his locality ; in wJiich I have very freely 

' Qumuborry'a alaicr, LmIj Intwlla, married Sir Willi»m LockhBrt of Cur- 
•laln. Their lUugliler ImbclU wu the wife of Sir Tlii.mwi Kirkpatricli, my 
gnadfilher'a fatlicr. llenee titrte imdilinnp, &.c.-~Natr hf Mr Sliarpe, 

• " We, E*rl of Qnocti'.Urrio, SherilT PrineipBl of the Shim "f Duuifrim, pnn- 
fiimis to > neotDinendktion of Iiib Mnjeaty'a Prity Council, •ignifled to as li;r thair 
letter of Uie date the I Itli day uf Marcii \679, founded upon ane exprcta wurand 
froni Ills Kiog'a Majnly, dated at Wliileliall the IHth day of January laal, da 
hereby make and eoiitliluta the Lairds of Qaterhuuan and Kartnluil] to bo our 
Shrrifla Depute within tho aaid ahirv,— In Ihc effect uU'lHrwritlin only, with full 
power and commiHiDn to tliem or an; one of Ihem, to alBa and hold SlwrifT Coum al 
the ordinar place* aecuaiumed, iaeae forth prreepta of autrnnondinj; penmna wilhln 
the aaid ahiiT, gtiiliy, or tliat eliall be guilty, of contrateming itia lawa mad* 
against Kpantlion, being prewnt at Conventicle*, peraons guilty of diaordcrly bap- 
tiama and marriage*, reactling and ronmaning with fufjiiiira and Inlarrommuned 
peraons and vagrant preachers, and to pmtiouDoa ■ent''nce againal the permn* 
gailly, eonfonn* la tho lawa and pruliee of thia Kiiigdnm | and to dirHt prvoepta 
and other eueulur'jila fur pulling Ih* annie Vo due •xecution ; and, |c*nprally, all 
and anndry other tJiinga necotaar In tho prvmin to do, u**, and «irn;« al* t^lli* 
and hvello as any olhar SliarlfT- Depute haa dine or may do, pmmillcn. do rato. 
Pro>iding that tliir preaanu la to b* wlihnul prejudice lo any cither of my depute* 
alrMdy named bi jiulgn Jointly and aepantsly with Uia aaid Sheriff- Depute, and 
that the grwiling Ihenx'f ahall no way* derogate to our right of juriadictlaa *■ 
prinpipal SlivrifF, *a accunbt nf llio law ; and thai thia oaminioliin omtluna during 
Ihe pleaaura of hit Majesty's friry Ouneil. In wiUiH* wheranf Ihir Pnaonla ar* 
aubaeryved with our hand at Uie day of IBIU yoar*. 

before U>lr wito«**."— A'o** V ^' •"*"'I* 



yoan. ^_ 



254 MEMORIAI^ OF TUE 

written to him, and if he resolve to delay further troubling 
the country till the Commissioners meet, I shall labour to get 
a quorum of them together sometime next week. What he 
resolves in this, try, and acquaint me, which the bearer will 
get conveyed, and before meeting the shire ye shall hear from 
me at more length. As also, let me know if the troops 
brought in any prisoners lately, and what else has occurred 
there worth my knowledge." 

" Sanquhar, 26th April, 1679. — Desire Claverhouse to bring, 
or send, his order for locality to the meeting of Commissioners 
of Supply to be held at Thornhill, Ist of May, at 9 o'clock of 
the morning ; as also, that the several quarter-masters bring 
or send notes of what hay and straw has been furnished them 
from their whole locality ; and a note of such persons, if any 
be, who have exacted more for it than what is contained in 
the Council's orders. Acquaint Claverhouse with this meeting, 
80 that he, or any he trusts, may be there with the order, and 
accounts of locality foresaid ; else nothing will be done. 
Present my service to him, and tell him, that as it seems I 
have mistaken his orders as to the matter of quartering, so I 
am sure he has mistaken my letter, in several particulars ; in 
which I had writ to him before this, but that ye told me he 
was in Galloway, and the meeting of the shire is to be so 
soon. There are some alarms here from the west, but I hope 
without ground. What occurs about Dumfries, or the 
Stewartry of Kirkcudbright, acquaint me timeously ; with all 
else worth your trouble ; and if Claverhouse get orders to 
march." 

The meeting mentioned in these letters took place at New 
Dalgarnock ; but Captain Graham not thinking proper to 
attend it in person, sent his Lieutenant, Captain Bruce of 
Earlshall, to transact with the Commissioners. 

** The Laird of Earlshall, as Lieutenant to Claverhouse, pre- 
sented an act of Privy Council, of the date 17th day of January 
last, Commissionating the Earls of Nithsdale and Queensberry, 
Sir Robert Dalyell, Corehead younger, Westerhall, Craigdar- 
roch, Carnsalloch, and Eccles, or any three of them, to meet 
with the chief officer, and impose localities for furnishing the 
the horse and dragoons quartered within the shire, at the rate 






■j^^H VISCOUNT UF DUNDKE. 2u<^ 

of two shillings per intone of straw, and two sliiliings and six- 
pence per stono uf hay, with certification, that letters of hom- 
ing upon forty eight hours will be directeil therefor ; and 
likewise produced another act of Council, dat«d 18th February 
last, mentioning that several troops of horse and companies of 
dragoons were not provided to their localities ; therefore, 
orderiug these empowered in the former Commission to pro- 
vide the forces with as much hay and straw as they should 
have had from the beginning of their entry to their quarters, 
for supplying of those who have already furnished ; with 
certification, that this Commissionate will be cited before the 
Council under the pain of rebellion." 

" The Commissioners having treated with Earlshall, he, 
upon their offer of fourteen days provision to a hundred and 
fifty-eight horse, of hay and straw at the Council's rates, com- 
mencing this day, has promised, that, in case the Privy 
Council shall only allow a hundred horse to be furnished out 
of this shire, that the troop shall accept the fifteen days pro- 
vision to be given to the other fifty out of the fore-end of tho 
next locality ; and ordains the Clerk to receive a declaration 
from the Captain and Lieutenant thereof. The Commissioners 
allow two stone of straw, and six stone of hay to ilk horse for 
every week during the said space, with power, to those liable, 
to give seven stoiio of hay for all, if they please ; and ordain 
the Clerk to get from the commanding officer the double of 
the accompt of hay already received ; and ordain him and tha 
Collector to cast ilk man's proportion, conform to tlio valuation 
hook. The Commissioners recommend to Lag, Closebnm. 
Camsalloch, Capenoch, John Alisono, or any three of Ihem, to 

I treat with the officers of horse, and to adjust all other matt«r8 
relating to the locality, and to report to the next meeting; 
and appoint the 9th day of May instant, to the said Committee 
to treat with thu said offioena ; and ordnin the Collector and 
Clerk to Bubscribc the cast under their hands, and the Collec- 
tor to give timeous intimation to ilk parish upon Sunday next, 
to 1m> brought in betwixt and Thursday following, under the 
pain of Cess, conform to the act of Convention." 
But it appoarK (hat Claverhouse on lonmin^ the particulars 
of his [.icnk>nanl"8 negociution, refusid to wiiirlinu it, greatly 



256 MEMORIALS OF THE 

to the rage of Queensberry, who also had another cause of in- 
dignation, from Captain Graham's refusal to co-operate with 
a new Sheriff-Depute, nominated by the Earl. On the 3d of 
May 1679, he writes thus from Sanquhar Castle to his friend 
in Dumfries : — 

" I am much surprised that Claverhouse should decline 
Earlshalls transaction with the Commissioners, which, as we 
have no reason to value, so I think Earlshall should not take 
very well, being a thing so solemnly done. However, I have 
ordered my proportion of locality, from the several parishes 
where my interest lies, to be brought to Dumfries at the time 
appointed ; and, in regard of the great distance, if you can 
get me hay near Dumfries, at reasonable rates, you'll oblige 
me extremely. I think you did well in ordering the parishes 
about Dumfries to bring in what locality they can, and so soon 
as possible ; for I shall be sorry the King s forces suflFer the 
least inconvenience the country can prevent ; but, upon the 
other hand, impossibilities are not to be expected ; nor, I am 
confident, will the Council press anything of that nature upon 
a country both loyal and regular every way. If Claverhouse 
act warrantably and legally, there is no ground of complaint ; 
otherwise, he may assure himself, we who have interest in 
this shire will do what we can for redress. This you may 
freely show him ; and, with all, that I shall be very sorry the 
country and he have the least difi'erence, which I am sure we 
shall labour to prevent by all just and reasonable offers m our 
power ; and as nothing more should be asked, so nothing more 
will be given. I am likewise surprised to find Claverhouse 
and Earlshall will not concur as Sherifi's Depute, with Mr 
James Alexander, though, by the Council's command I have 
commissioned him jointly with them. What's the occasion 
of this I cannot imagine ; and Earlshall spoke in far other 
terms to me at Thornhill. Upon the whole matter, it's cer- 
tainly hard that when I would most willingly concur in the 
Council's method to serve the King, all must be obstructed 
by caprice of strangers, who, I fear, do not efi'ectuate 
what's expected, and the nature of the thing requires. How- 
ever, I have ordered Mr Alexander to do what's fit for pre- 
serving my privilege, and serving the King in the way 



{. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



257 



prescribed by the Council, and doing justice tu tbc Country ; 
and whoever obslructs bim in hie duty may possibly answer 
for it. I doubt not your readiness in all may concern tbo 
country and me, and do duBue to hoar frequently from you 
anent the premises, and what else occurs where you are. Iq 
order to all this, I have to-day wrote to Edinburgh, and will 
have answers next week, wherewith you shall be acquainted ; 
but am very indifTerent what they prove ; for, as to the 
tocality, all the couutry is able to do is offered ; and, if more 
Ims ordered, I'm content Claverbouse take it where he can find 
it ; and for the affair of the fanatics, it's an employment I'm 
not very ambitious of ; and when Claverbouse and Earlshall 
cxoner me of it, I shall acknowledge the favour, and do wish 
them sucesB in that and thuir other trusts, Acquaint mc, by 
the first, if Claverbouse be goue to Edinburgh." 

Captain Graham, however, seems in some measure to have 
made bis point good respecting the locality ;' at least, to have 
effected an alteration of tbe first arrangement. For, — " Con- 
form to the former sodcnmt, the Earl of Nitbsdale, Craigdar- 
roch, and Capeuocb ha>nng communed with Claverbouse, thoy 
think reasonable that tbe hundred and fifty horse, mentioned 
iu the former sedenint, should be ]irovidcd with another fort- 
night's provision of hay and straw, until grass ho grown, with 
tbe quality specified in the foresaid sederunt ; and recommend 
to tbe Earl of Queensberry to convene the whole Commiseio- 
ners, in order to the settling with Claverbouse anent any other 
matters relating to the rests of locality, or what else shall 
happen to occur betwixt the Commissioners and Claverbouse ; 
and think fit that every week's provision bo brought into 
Dumfries upon the Wednesday of the said week," Ac, Ac. — 
" Dumfries, ytli May 1679." 

But Graham of Cloverhouse was speedily called away frooi 
these petty contentions, to display his conduct and courage in 
the field. Tbe whigs, who hud been concerting measures for 
some time, now collected in a body, and unfurling the banner 

■ [CbTBrhouM wu lighl, and Mied as Wpllmgctoa woald hftvo ■kUhI aodsr 
■ImiUir eircunutuicM. IIU cormpondenca nhowa lliat ho andpntDod the Uominl*- 
■arial dcpwlmeDt of hi* Irluome dulM^ fu better thto thtj who iculioud,!' 
oppOM'l him. QiicenriieiT)' wu jmIciu about li'u o*ii jniHadiplJon] 

• 17 



258 MEMORI.VrS OF THE 

of the Covenant, with a stout heart and n weak lirain, badej 
OeRance to all the enemies of the Lord. 



[Section IV.— The Murder of Archbishop Sharpe,] 

Tin' Western insurrection was preceded hy a very memo- "I 
ruble fxjiloit, the murder of the Archbishop of St Andrews, f 
Tho Primate, labouring under the hatred of so furions a sect, | 
who already had nearly sacrificed him, generally took saffi- 
cient precautions to frustrate all their plans of revenge. But I 
at lust, on the unlucky 3d of May 1679, travelling towards ] 
St Audrews from EdinljurgL, he had the indiscretion to eend 
his beet armed attendants to the house of Lord Crawford, 
with a message of compliment, and remained with his 
daughter unprotected but by the coachman, the postilion, and 
two other attendants on horseback. Nine villains, whereof 
Balfour of Kinloch, tho Bishop's debtor, and Ilackston of 
Itathillet, brother-in-law to tho former, who had been inc 
cerated by tho Bishop for debt, were the leaders, had for bos 
time anxiously awaited such an opportunity. Upon Magus J 
Muir, a wild and lonely cominuu near St Andrews, the coach- 
man ])erceiving horsemen as he thought pursuing the carriage, I 
drove cjuicker, which occasioned the Primate to look out, and j 
iie aware of his danger. He said to his daughter, — " God help I 
me, my poor child, for I am gone." The servants, however, 
drove furiously ; but tho speed of six good horses was vain. 
The pursuers still gained ground, and at last got near enough 
to lire upon the coach, but without eflect. Balfour of Kinloch, 
being better mounted than the rest, first overtook the coach- 
man, who kept his horse off with his whip. He then attacked 
the postilion, wounded him in the face, shot in the back and 
hamstrung one of tho horses ho guided, and so stopping the 
carriage gave time to his friends to come up. Heedless of the 
young lady's danger, who was shrieking and weeping most 
bitterly, another volley was fired into the coach, and one 
pistol discharged so close to the Primate that his daughter 
rubbed olf the burning wadding from his gown. Wounded 
by a ball between the second and third ribs, the Archbishop 




VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



259 






I 



vne immediately aft«r etabbed with a Bmall sword, tliu ruffians 

all Uic while exclaiming, — " Come out Judas, come out cruel 

blooily traitor." At length the Bisliop bimBelf opened the 

coach-door, and went forth to die. His moving eulrcatics, 

his venerable grey hairs, could obtain no mercy. Wliile he 

was imploring compassion towards bis daughter, he extended 

his hand to one of the party wiiom he is supposed to have 

knoiiTi, when the villain started back, and with a stroke of hia 

sword cut him more than half way through the wrist. The 

Primate tlien sank upon hia knees in prayer, covering his 

i'head with bis hands (which they still continued to mangle), 

ijuiil protected by hia daughter, who, repressing female weak- 

.^.noss, with a pious courage as rare as admirable, strove to iu- 

jterpose and j»reserve him. But, wounded in the hand and in 

the thigh, she at length fell into a swoon, and the villaius 

y ceased not from their violence, till they left the old man 

Viurdered with many wounds, having the whole back part of 

tilnLHlriill JimlfflD tfi T'lPi^fn, ft'ifl his lirai ^ sca ttered upon the 

ground. ^"~--_--'''^ s— — -^ 

Francis Ravaillac stole the knife with which he destroy^td 
Henry. Before the pious assassins of Sharp left their prejv 
they pillaged the corpse, the young lady, tlie coach, and even 
the Ber\'ants. From the Archbishop's pockets they took seve- 
ral articles which wore affirmed to bo charms against gun- 
shot ; and bo strong was the fanatical rumour of their effi- 
ciency, that several ])hysicians liad to give it under their hands 
that the victim was pierced by a bullet, ere many of the godly 
would believe it. The Prelate's courage, during the tedious 
and dreadful oatastropho, is attributed by the whigs to confi- 
dence in Buch charms. They say that whenever he saw cold 
iron his courage fell. This caunot bo true, because he waa 
pierced with a sword before he left the coach, and his presence 
of mind, ttiey themselves acknowledge, had not even then fyr 
saken him. He behaved with great fortitude. Some nif 
whig accounts state (and with manifest satisfaction), that, 
near the conclusion of his sufferings, one of the party struck 
him on tlio face with a ahahblct or faidchion, upon which " bis 
jaw foil, and he uttered one loud and horrible cry." In the 
ach thuy al«i discovered a very notable proof of the Bishop's 



2G0 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

inclination to popery, a bible adorned with cuts in taille douce. 
Ilaxton, as before mentioned, had suffered imprisonment 
through the Prelate's means, which seems to have exasperated 
him. As to Balfour, he was a desperado equal to the most 
daring atrocities. Both in the first Presbyterian account of 
the crime, and in all the depositions, Hackstou is positively 
affirmed to have murdered the Prelate. The ser\^ant of a 
house near the fatal spot, deponed that Haxton and Balfour 
left their coats in that house before the murder, and came 
back for them after it ; that Haxton was mounted on a tohite . 
horse, and Balfour on a hay. The Bishop's servants deponed ^ 
that the man on the bay horse stopt the coach, and that the • 
man on the white murdered their master. Therefore, I am^^ 
tempted to believe that the improbable tale of Haxton s /or- Ip 
bearance is not true. * In the retreat, the assassins met anotlier 
servant of the Primate's w^hom at first they proposed to kill as 
a servant of Judas Iscariot. But, on second thoughts, they 
only robbed liim, and bade him begone, " for his master was 
gone home before him." 

Though it is generally asserted that the assassins were lying 
in wait for one Carmichael, an agent of the bishop's, when 
they chanced to encounter more exalted prey, that could not 
really be the case, if the informations sent from St Andrews to 
the Privy Council are to be credited. They were compiled 
from the depositions of John Millar, tenant in Magask, and 
his family ; from those of Kobert Black, tenant in Baldinny, 
his family and servants ; William Ding^vall, father to one of 
the murderers, and several other persons. These w^itnesses 
deponed, that, ** His Grace was waylaid by diverse parties, so 
that whether he had gone straight to St Andrews, or repaired 
to his house of Scotscraig, he could not escape them ; that the 
nine men who committed the murder, w^ere the night before 
at a country place, within a mile of Craighall, called Hurles- 
wind ; and that one of them, with Andrew TurnbuU, tenant 

' [Even according to that fanatical version, which waA concocted by one of the 
marderers (Russell), Haxton's <' forbearance" consisted in tuptrintending the mur- 
der a little apart, and lending a deaf ear to tlie intrcaties of their venerable victim. 
This might prove him a coward, but could not redeem him from the stigma of the 
vilest of murders.] 




VISCOUNT OF DUNDHK. 



201 



to Broomliall (w}io liad crossed the wator the same tide witb 
bis'Grace), came to Eeauuway ubnut iniduight., ami enqitirvd 
if mj Lord St Androwa was lodged at Captain Selon's, and 
l<eing told that be was, lie presently returned to the rest ; that 
on the morning of the 3d of May, they weie seen on Tace's 
muir, and intended to have attacked the coach on the heath 
to the south of Ceres, whore it seems they were in some con- 
fusion, for Rathillet's horse run from him, and was taken, and 
givt-n back to him, by the gardener of Struthers; and John 
Balfour, with one more, entered so far into the town of Ceres, 
in pursuit of tlie coach, that by mistake be roile tu the minis- 
ter's gate, and quickly retired; thereafter, having still the 
coach in view, they kept half a milu to the south thereof, till 
they came to Kiuuiiimonth, the ooach being then about Blobo- 
bole, and they quickly camo down from iho height, and gal- 
lopped through a little valley at Ladnddie limekilns, having the 
top of the coach still in view, witli design to have conimitt«d 
the murder at the double dykes of Magask ; that three dRyu 
before the murder, some of the assassins had a meeting at 
Millar's house in Magask, where they concerted the business ; 
that the next night they lodged at Kobert Black's house in 
Baldiiiny, whose wife was a great instigator of the fact ; and 
that, at parting, when one of them kissed her, she prayed that 
God might bless and prosper them, and added these words, — 
' If long Leslie (Mr Alexander Leslie, minister of Ceres) bo 
with him, lay him on the green aUo.' To which the niflRan 
answered, — ' There is the band that shall do it ;' tti&t the said 
Androw Tumbnll (who was ouo of the two that camo to Ken- 
noway the night before), at his return lo the olher assassins, 
cncouragLd them to the fact, by telling them that all the west 
wiM in arms already." 

Thoflo particulars may appear impertinent to readers who 
itro unacipiainled with the party sophistications until which 
the narratives of this terrific murder have been i>oUuted, and 
that those have generally be«n derived from the falsehoods of 
the murderers Uiemselvcs. after they had time to fasliion cir- 
ciimslancoB according to the most convenient order, ll only 
remains to add, that the whigs, among whom Wmlrow at least 
plioiild have kiinwii lirttcr, makf a utraTu-'' itrnfiijiiiiri iHttwi-cii 



262 MEXORIAI^ OF TUE 

the last scene of this Prelate, and that of his predecessor Car- 
dinal Beaton. They put the Cardinal's very words into the 
mouth of Archbishop Sharp, and the pious exhortations of 
Norman Lesly and his accomplices are adapts to Hackston 
and Balfour / Great, indeed, was the triumph of the Presby- 
terians on the Arch-Prelate's deserved downfall, as they 
termed it. Though they possessed not a poet like Sir David 
Lindsay, to trample upon his ashes, and raise up the shadow 
of— 

** Ane woundit man, aboandantlie bleeding, 

With visage paHl, and with ane deadlie cheir,*^ — 

yet, in their sermons, they talked of his murder as an action 
glorious and Just, holding up the perpetrators of it to the re- 
verence and imitation of their hearers. Alexander Shields, 
in his villanous book called " A Hind let Loose," styles the 
murderers " worthy gentlemen, men of courage and zeal for 
the cause of God ;" and affirms, that they executed " righteous 
judgment" upon this " truculent traitor." And Wodrow re- 
cords the whole story with the most fraternal cunning, and 
apologetic tenderness. 

Such was the end of James Sharp, Archbishop of St An- 
drews, a man very considerable in many points of view.* That 
his abilities were great, cannot be doubted ; and that his de- 
portment, both as a public and private character, hath found 
many encomiasts and defenders is certain, in spite of Mr 
Laing's rash negation, the more surprising as the memoirs of 
Sharp by Simpson must have been well known to him. Kirk- 
ton confesses him a man of parts, and a scholar ; but, envied 
and hated by Burnet, his memory in later times has greatly 
suffered through the fashion of implicitly relying on the in- 
vective of that spiteful and disingenuous author. The ob- 
scurer whig railers tell us, that, " sometimes when at table, 
he would whisper in his wife's ear, ' the Devil take her,' when 
things were not ordered tohis contentment ;" but for all that, 
and the other crimes so lavishly imputed to him, he was a 
man of humanity, and bestowed large sums in secret charity 

1 [Archbishop Sharp is ore of those great persoDages of history whose real 
cliaracter has been buried beneath the ondrageous calninnies of Scotch fanaticism.] 



\ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



2G3 



to the widows and orphans of the Jiinatics, tlirough the hands 
of Lord Warriston's daughter, who still adhered to her fanatical 
father's persuasion. He w»« murdered at the age of sixty-one, 
after having been Primate of Scotland for eighteen years. 



[Thifl long meditated murder can be traced distinctly to 
the ruthles.'i agitation of the Hemonslralora, or suppressed 
savages of the Covenanting Kirk. Glorified, without diBguise, 
by their famous apostle Shields, and others of his kiduey, that 
fiuccesa of Satan was the signal for the most virulent and 
vulgar fictions against the character of the venerable victim. 
While thosfl words of resigned agony, and deepest pathos, — 
" God help me, my poor child, for I am gone," — were bearing 
witness in Heaven against them, his murderers, and their no lesH 
guilty abettors, were busy on earth with blasphemous att«mpt8 
to cloak their crime under the jthraseology of fanaticism, and 
to excuse it by the miserable expedient of outrageous calumny. 
In their wake soon followed such writers as Burnet and Wod- 
row, giving plausible currency to the worst falsehoods of pri- 
vate or party malevolence, a pollution of history most unfor- 
tunately pandered to by the genius of a Macaulay. If this 
solemn league and covenant of political writers, a^nst the 
integrity of history, is to obtain credit, the monstrous conclu- 
sion becomes inevitable, that, at the period when Graham of 
CInverhouse commenced his public career, the aristocracy of 
Scotland, of the highcKt grade, were, in every act and deed, in 
temper, sentiments, and morals, the most savage scr^'ant8 of 
Satan ; while the democracy, of the lowest and least educated 
classes, were sainte in their lives, and, in their actions, the in- 
spired prophets aud ministers of God 1 Pre-eminent among 
these last, tlie miinleroUH pedlar thus hastened to cast his 
atone upon the cairn of the murdered Prelate, " Some time 
ago I wrote a short account of the unheard of wicked Kteps of 
his life, particularly his strangling liis own child, begot in 
fornication, with hia napkin, and burying it below the hearth- 
i^tonc, and his cniul treacherous treatment of tlie mother 
thereof; but hi.i life and death being now published by a morrt 
large and mir hand* has prevented m.', wliiih 1 am giftd of. 

' I A la* &d1 (mnymoiu llbcllpv ] 



26 1 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Great Mr Rutherford, of whom apostate Sharp was a malicious 
persecutor, said, — when ministers and others were admiring 
him /or goodness f — that he would trample upon all theirnecks. 
I have often wondered if ever the sun shined upon a man 
guilty of so many dreadful unheard-of acts of wickedness, at- 
tended with all aggravating circumstances to make them 
prodigiously heinous, except his dear brother Judas, who mur- 
dered the young prince of Iscariot, and his own father, mar- 
ried his mother, and betrayed his Lord. All knows what end 
he made. And so much noise o/ his death ! making it their 
ensnaring criminal questions of that time, for which fiveybtVA- 
ful martyrs were executed, and hung in chains in that spot of 
ground. Magus Muir, the 25th of November 1679, who were 
actually free of his death, having never been in the shire of 
Fife, — as is to 6e seen in NaphtaliJ' * 

Let us turn from all this brutality of invective, to a letter, 
hitherto unprinted, written by the Chancellor Eothes to his 
friend the Earl (afterwards Duke) of Queensberry, before 
whose rapid elevation the flaming star of Lauderdale was 
about to pale. We shall find it a relief to regard these aristo- 
cratic demons of political history, through the medium of their 
own familiar letters, instead of regarding them for ever in the 
false chronicles of the scandal-mongering Burnet, and the 
martyrology-weaving Wodrow. 

The Chancellor Rotlies to the Earl of Queensberry, 

" My DEAR Lord, — I received yours at nine o'clock this 
morning, and being just going to Council, I could not answer 
it sooner. I am very sure mine came to your hands some time 
yesterday, being given your man before twelve on Saturday, 
and which was very full as affairs stood then. Saturday I 
went to dine at Hatton, at Mr Maitland's son's christening,* 

[Patrick Walker'n Life and Death of Mr John Welwood, iJioj^. Prerit. ii. 184. 
This rubbish of calamnv is actually adopted by Wodrow, and palmed by him upon 
history for truth, but with such Jesuitical cunning as to conceal the absurdity, while 
recording the atrocity. See before, p. 72 ; aud Note in the Appendix, for a full 
exposure of Wodrow 's calumnious treatment of the diaracter of Archbishop Sharp.] 
■ [The Mr Maitlaiid here mentioned, was Richard Maitland (afterwards Earl of 
Lauderdale), eldest son of Charles Maitland of Hatton, called Lord Hattun by his 



4 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 266 

and afterwards resolved to cross the water at the Ferry, where 
I was met with the unhappy newa of my Lord St Andrews' 
murder, which was committed on Saturday last, at twelve 
o'clock a-day, near two miles of St Andrews, by ten or eleven 
armed men, which veiy much altera the face of affairs her©. 
I immediately returned to Edinburgh, at ten at night, and 
culled a committee of the Council, which sat till one in the 
morning. A fuller Council was called at eight yesterday 
morning, and eat till ten in my lodgings, and afterwards met 
again at four in the Council-house, aud staid tilt eight at night. 
We have sent an express already to the King, and this day 
pubhshcB a proclamation against any such persons, and aneot 
their apprehending. The particulars were too long to insert 
here, but you shall have it by the nt-xt. Ab I said in my last, 
if my Lord St Andrews bad missed this urthappy accident, bo 
had been gone for London ere this could come to your bands, 
and now my Lord Hatton and his son will. It came to my 
knowledge, but at a great distance, that the Council was de- 
signing to commission me to go up ; but I crushed it in the 
bud, by telling I neither could nor would accept any such 
offer, unless I had a call from my master. It is like the King 
may call, or the Council send some ; but no sooner shall 1 get 
any, but as soon you, — from whom I can keep nothing in my 
heart, — shall got notice. As it is talked, those hose unworthy 
people in Fife, threaten they will follow the same example 
with several persons in public trust, not sparing your humble 
servant ; but I am not afraid in the least for them. There 
are certainly but very few Fife people amongst them ; but, I 
am afraid, some there were, and I am very confident that most 
execrable murder will be discovered. Let the unjust world 
say what they will, ho was not only Lord Primate of this 
kingdom, but a faithful subject, and a wise and just person, 
and a most eminent pillar of the Church ; and, I am sure, my 
friend at that rate that 1 do not know what to do since he ta 
gone, hut to revenge myself upon all that murdering sect. 
" I have just now, since the writing of this mucli, ri'ceived 



wba aflerWMdi ■umeEjul Li* broUin-, tlie 
B Earidoni at tlut Uvii]). TliD liouw n{ KaUon » 

'le Furlli, rir.1 («r Timiii Mi.l.CaMor, in Uid-LoUluui.) 



DDtorlaaa Duke a\ 



266 ]|£MO£lALS or TUE 

intelligence ihat my Lord Treaj-nrer-Depnttr* and his son, are 
to go for London u»-morrc'V in ilje aft-emoon ; which is more 
than nc'C'^e^sarv for LinL fiT iLe Duchesss malice as to his 
birthri^rhi is still increasing : and. no doubt, if his brother 
shall noi prc-ve Aerv steadj as K* Lis interest, the Duchess will 
ruin Lim : and the ^pf^^ of malice of our countirmen, that is 
now gone nj». is cLieflj against him, excepting only his brother.* 
Several others here will certainly go ; mx Lord Murray, Lord 
Advocate. Jusiice-Geni-ral. and. it mav be, one or two more ; 
but that is still dep»ending till an express return from the 
Dukv of Lauderdale, which will he on Thursday night. Now 
all is aloft. God knows what the erent will be ; the Parlia- 
ment of England having fallen violently upon the Duke of 
York : and. I suppose, t<^-morrow's post will bring much more 
of the paniculars. It is talked as if they were to fall next 
upon the Queen ; and where then [all] will end, God only 
knows, for the kingdoms, by all appearance, are inflamed, and 
nothing but the immediate hand of GvhI can prevent trouble 
and commotion^ The unftaralleled condition that I am in, 
puts me to think of a thousand things which pierhaps are irra- 
tional. Amongst the rest, with a total submission to yourself, 
what if vou should take a sudden, and unknown resolution to 
any, and make a step to Court, where I am sure all hands 
would Ix? ready to court you, and make vou welcome ;' where 
you might pick and choose, and take your measures according 
to the true rules of honour and honesty ? For when you part- 
ed with the King last, it did apj^ear he was not well satisfied 
with you ; for, before you came home, you was none of his 
Council, which was the single trust and employment you en- 
joyed under him. So that, I cannot but think, it were well 
becoming you to give his Majesty assurance of your readiness 
to serve him ; that if any alteration come, as it is very pro- 

1 [I^rd Ilatton wav at feud with his nstcr-iD-law, the termagant Dochess of 
Lauderdale.] 

* [The political cabal against the Lauderdale govemment, which eventually suc- 
ceeded iu ruining the family, was ali'eady working to that end.] 

> [Queensbcrry, though of a very jealous temper, and not a little violent, was 
highly Ctttiniated by all his cctuteniporaries, and also by the royal brothers. He 
w^ now about to rine ] 



1 

( 

I 



riSCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 267 

balile will, you may bo considered as willing, as you arc moet 
able, to do him service. 

" As to what you say in yours, in relation to Ctavefhoii«e, 
and of the jjetition from the gentlemen of the country con- 
ceniiug their localily,^ certainly when the King's govemmeut, 
and bis most eminent servants, are so evidently struck at, it 
is no proper time to mention husincss of that nature ; so that, 
if any body come from your shire, I will approve myself so 
much tlieir friends as to desire them to desist. If it l)0 poa- 
sihle that I may hear from you against Thursday's night, 1 
will hasten to Fife, tliat I may add my endeavours, with all 
the faculties of my soul, for the discovery of this lat« horrid 
murder. So, my dear Lord, till then, adieu. R,"'] 



[Section V. — Insurrectioa/oUmcing the Murder of the Pn'vuiie. 
Mas John King. The Bcftai of C'hverliome at Drtimcloij. 
CouhItm of Loudon. The Fanatics Defeat^ at Glasgow. 
Mas David Williamson. Measures to Suppress the Jtcbd- 
lious. The Fanatical JtekrUion m Scotland encouraged by 
Shaftesbury and the Evijlish Wltigs.^ 

The Archbishop's murder caused a universal alarm among 
the Boyalists, who had even more reason for terror than they 
imf^ined. A little while before tbe murder, largo sums of 
money were contributed at conventicles, on pretence of main- 
taining their hill-preachers (as they were called), and the 
poor of the Presbyterian persuasion, but, in fact, to purchase 
arms and ammunition for a general rebellion. Immediately 
after the murder, several parties in the west of Scotland took 
up arms under the command of Robert Hamilton, second son 
of Sir William Hamilton of Preston, the unworthy son, says 

■ [Th» ptrmmnwoX UK for autaialng tbe troopi omployod >g>llwt tlie iainntvnu, 

CUvcrhtruw ■■■ dning hi* iliily ■dinlnbly iti tliii m*IMr, u wb iluU lluil tnim liU 

iwn Mtmnpondaocg ; ind QuHnnben-/ «u JmIoui of biro, uul oiirauoiuililv on 

Iha HibjvcL RoUm u* that, and doc* ai>t liuiUM lo ulicck Mm fur il. Stv bv- 

■.P.2A7.1 

[Ordinal. QiwcBsbiirr> rupcn. Must u( tlin Ctwno«11or'> Idlcn to Qim-ns- 
bsrrjr u« nnMl)' tlpicil Hitli !)•■' Inliial l<.\ 



268 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

Creighton, of a most worthy father, but, wo may add, the 
worthy pupil of the meritorious Bishop Burnet. At Evandale, 
in Lanarkshire, they were joined by David Hackston, together 
with the other Fife bloodhounds. On the 29th of May (1679), 
tlio anniversary of the King's birth, they repaired to Rutherglen, 
and there published a protest against the abomination of cele- 
brating such a day, — " kept every year for the setting up an 
usurped power ^ destroying the interest of Cliristin the land," — 
and protesting " against all sinful and unlawful acts, emitted 
and executed, published and prosecuted, against our (Cove- 
nanted Iteformation." They then proceeded publicly to burn 
several acts of Parliament lately made, by way of retaliation 
for tlie treatment of their Covenant. 

Captain Graham was now summoned by Government to 
clieck the eflforts of rebellion at Evandale, and ordered to march 
with a detachment of a hundred and twenty dragoons, and a 
Lieutenant, with his own troop, to attack the rebels. Shortly 
before this, Graham had surprised a conventicle in the parish 
of Galashiels, where several pious ladies were apprehended, 
together with the preacher himself, and a fellow-labourer in 
the muirlands of Satan. These gentlewomen were the wives 
of the Lairds of Torwoodlee, Galashiels, Newton younger, 
Ashiestiel, and Femylie. Mrs Jane Hunter, spouse to Mr 
Pringle, and his daughter, the Laird of Ashiestiel, together 
with several meaner persons, were also taken. Thomas Wilkie 
was the preacher. A citation to appear before the Council 
was given to the women and their husbands. The Laird of 
Meldrum was ordered to proceed against the rest, and the 
preacher was sent to the Bass. 

Claverhouse on his march caught Mas John King, one of 
the most celebrated of the fanatic preachers, in his bed, near 
Hamilton, and carried him, together with fourteen others, into 
the town of Hamilton, which he reached on Saturday the 31st 
of May. This King was a worthy of esi)ecial note. During 
nine years he had given trouble to Government, being chap- 
lain to Henry Lord Cardross (himself very fanatical), and hold- 
ing conventicles near Stirling, with great cunning and perse- 
verance. His ministry, indeed, proved fruitful not only in 
spiritual but in carnal produce, as my Lady Cardross's favourite 



/ 



VtSCOU.Vr OF DUNDEE. 



2(59 



' Waiting ■woman became a mother by him. On tlus iiccount, 

when, in the year 1C74, he was seized and imprisoned in Ediu- 

I burgh, the pious hiily bailed him, — she promising to the 

I Council that be should hold no more conventicles, and he to 

fher, that he would marry her handmaid, whose name was 

[ Creighton. He certainly did make Miss Creighton an liuncst 

[ woman ; but ruiuud the credit of hia mistress; continuing to 

I cant and preach so zealously, that the Privy Council once 

I more issued orders to apprehend him. It is not wonderful 

that he found favour in the eyes of the fair se-i, for he is de- 

Bcril>ed as being, — " a braw muckle carle, wi' a wliite hat, and 

a great bob o' ribbons on the cock o't." Ho was again actually 

flcijied, but rescued by the mob ; and when, for the third limo, 

he fell into the hands of justice, and ClaTerhousc, it was his 

fortune still to elude for a space the punishment due to his 

crimee. 

Graham had intelligence that the rebela were drawn up at 
a place called Drumclog, in considerable numbers, and well 
armed, being resolved to hold a conventicle there on Sunday, 
the 1 St of June. Some of his friends would fain have dissuad- 
ed liim from attacking a force so superior as theirs was now 
eapposed to be ; but his bravery would not allow him to give 
* ear to such salutary counsel. Early on the Sunday morning, 
he marched from Ilainilton to Strathaven town, which is about 
five miles from Hamilton, and throe from Drumclog. Mr 
Douglas had already commenced public prayer, when the 
whigB wore warned of the approach of the tnxips, by a watch 
tliey had placed on Txiudon Hill, about a mile from Drumclog, 
' who discerned the King's forces very soon after they had passed 
Btrathftven. Upon this the unarmed retired, and the saints, 
who were digbt in warlike weed, resolved to encounter the 
foe. 

Claverhouse marching onwards, soon came within sight of 
these rebels, whereby he became empowered to open bis com- 
mission from the Privy Council, which, by a strange freak that 
Bocms to have been entirely needless, he had boon ordered not 
to do until then.' To his no small surprise he now discovered 

■ [TIiIk facT Is aol eonfinnDd bj- QavorhouM'* own diipBlohoi, detailing nil lii* 
[inaiii dliiga Hi llil* rrinia. Mr Sharps, whrn writing hi* aceouul at the affair of 



270 MEMORIALS OF THE 

that he was commanded to attack the whigs let their numbers 
be over so great. The Council empowered him to kill all he 
found in arms at any field meeting, to treat them as traitors, 
and to discover, seize, and upon resistance, kill all who had 
any share in the insolence at Rutherglen. 

The rebel force amount^jd to six hundred men, commanded 
by Robert Hamilton, Haxton, and Balfour; while Graham's 
troop of horse, and other forces, did not exceed a hundred and 
eighty. They were strongly posted in a boggy straight, al- 
most unapproachable by cavalry, with a wide ditch in front. 
Graham's dragoons discharged their carabines, but the whigs 
fell flat upon their faces the instant they presented, so that 
the fire made no impression upon them. The Royalists then 
attempting to charge, were cast into complete disorder by the 
nature of the ground. Balfour, one of the Bishop's murderers, 
commanded the Presbyterian horse, which he immediately led 
against the enemy ; and, at the same time, Captain William 
Cleland, — a furious whig, and a terrible poet^ — together with 
Hackston, incited the foot to make a vigorous attack. During 
the engagement, one of the parishioners, concealing himself 
behind a hillock, fired eight shots at Claverhouse, in hopes of 
destrojdng so great an adversary to the congregations of the 
righteous, but none of the balls took eficct. The retreat, how- 
ever, now became general, and Graham himself ran the utmost 
hazard of being taken. A coimtrj'^ fellow cut open his horse's 
belly with a scythe,* and the animal's bowels were trailed along 
the ground for more than a mile. But by dismounting one of 
his trumpeters, he at last reached Glasgow in safety. 

And lucky was it for him that he did so, as the whigs would 
have shown him no mercy. Ilis bravery and determined con- 
duct, added to the name they abhorred, had already rendered 
him hateful to the whole party, who imagined that in Claver- 
house they beheld a new Marquis of Montrose, sprung from 
the ashes of his relative, and anxious to avenge his murder. 

Dnimclog, had not obtained the benefit of Claverhoase's letters. His own account 
of all these events, and of his proceedings, both prior and subsequent to his defeat 
at Drumclog, will be found in his official and private correspondence, which we 
have reserved to compose a subsequent Part of these Memorials.] 

^ [Claverhouse himself says, — <' with a pitchfork,** — but othen^'ise confirms the 
above account] 



^ 



TlSroUST ur DUXDliK. 



271 



At Drumclog was elain Robert Graham, cousin and cornet to 
the Captain,' by a musket sliot from one John Alstoun, a mil- 
ler'fl sou, and tenant to the aftenviirds celcliratoii Woir of 
Blackwood. The Presbyterians, perceiving the name of Graham 
on the neck of his shirt, mistook him for Claverhouse, and 
proceeded to vent their fury on the dead body w-ith a thouaand 
iudi^ities, Btabltiug it in many places, cutting off the hands 
and no&f, picking out the eyes, and beating the head to a 

jelly. 

At the battle of Tippermnir, gained by Montrose in the year 
1644, the word of the Covenanters was, — " Jesus, and no 
quarter." The whig word at Drumclog also was, " no quar- 
ter," and Hamilton, a profligate wretch, there caused a soldier 
to be murdered after quarter wag given.* About twenty of the 
King's soldiers were killed ; of the rebels only two or three 
fell, among whom was Dingwall, one of the murderers of 
Archbishop Sharp. After the Jlevolution, a grave stone, and 
epitaph were conferred upon him by his friends. 

Before tho onset, Claverhouse had placed his prisoner, Mas 
John King, in a small cabin on Loudon hill, with a dragoon 
sentry to prevent liim from making hia escape. The soldier, 
seeing his companions Ry, betook himself to flight also, and 
left Mas John to pursue his own di^'vices. In the hurry of the 
retreat, Graham passed the prisoner, who was bound, and 
could not even run to meet his victorious brethren. But the 

> [Tbi* U Dill confirmnl b; ClBTorhouBe'a dopalrh, oliieh uya, that the lint en- 
with the advuieing rebelii, ** brought dowa the rvmtl Mr Crar/nrJ, and 
\bt Stftk." IIxl liin relative and eluitnun fiiDeii, of cuurH lie would hft 
MM«.r.ed.) 

IM berurc, )i. 66, art to tbui rufHui, who appean to liarc been n mward tn 
boot. Wudnxv liimKir, in hin jnoilical bI^Id, ndverta (o the fact, aud Diiiliop Bur- 
net, wlm waa llamillon'R Dear eonneaion, and liad bveo bia tutor, aiaerto Iho Tact 
nt b» wwardica a» violent];, that the paaaafie watt aup|ir«iHd by tlie Driginal adi- 
tiin (UiB Ilii>hi>|i'a owo aoni) of bia malidoua maauaeript, but hna boen naturvd in 
tiM nveot Uarnrd adltlon. " The penon that led tliein" (at Dnitncing, mjf Ibf 
Hi«liiip)," had baan brvd by me, while I lived at (>la>i[aw, being the j^aunger aofi of 
Sir Tboniaa llaTniltDO tint had inarried mj aiatn-, hat bji a foriDrr wife, lie wae 
then a lively, luipeful faung man : but gettin); into Ikat eomi-ang, and into titrir 
iiutiiinn, he beeaine a crark-brainod eiilliiuiaat." Then follows Uiii lentuiae, which 
hia piou* rdllura hail ttwugbl Itl to auppr ii — ,— " and. under the allow of a liero, »aa 
an ignumlBloni ooward."— //M, o/ Hit Om» Tiau. *el. ii. p. 333. Otftrd rdll. 
18U.] 




272 MEMORIALS OP THE 

holy man was replete with triumph, and shouted after the 
fugitive commander, to carry his prisoner with him ; or, as 
others say, to stop and take the afternoon's preaching, Hax- 
ton, Balfour, and the other chiefs of the victorious party, re- 
paired that evening to the house of Lord Loudon, where the 
Earl himself, though well approving of their murderous 
extravagances, was crafty enough to keep out of sight. But 
his Lady publicly did the honours to the whole company. It 
was a supper of distinguished saints ; and among so many. 
Moseses, Ehuds, and Phineases, no doubt but that this ill 
conditioned jade esteemed herself little less than a Jael or a 
Judith^ 

On the news of the defeat at Drumclog reaching Glasgow, 
it was supposed that the rebels would advance to assault the 
town, and the King's troops stood to their arms all night. 
To impede the attacks of the Presbyterian cavalry. Captain 
Graham, knowing that Glasgow was so open that it could not 
be properly barricaded, contrived to erect near the cross a sort 
of protection for his men, composed of deals, and other lum- 
ber. He then ordered Captain Creighton, with six dragoons, 
to sally forth at sunrise, and attempt to discover by which way 
the whigs intended to enter the town. These heroes had en- 
camped within a mile of Glasgow the preceding night, and 

^ In this age of love, and love letters, it may not be unacceptable to enliven the 
narrative with a couple of amatory billets that passed between this Lord Loudon 
and his wife, while yet unmarried. The laconic style of the Lady is much to be 
recommended to those fair letter writers who pique themselves in the talent of 
powdering red>haircd sentiments with rounded periods : — 

" For my Lady Margaret Montg^ynurie, 

** Madam, — The continuance of my misfortune, in not being yet able to wait 
upon your Ladyship, is beyond expi*ession vexing ; and the more I ponder my 
unspeakable loss, my anxiety is the greater, and cannot but continue so, till this 
sad and dark cloud be over ; and then the beams of your presence and favour will 
elevate the now perplexed heart of, Madam, your Ladyship's most affectionate and 
most humble servant, — Loudon.** 

** Loudon, SepUmber 5, 1G66." 

" For the Earl of Loudon. 
** Mt Lord, — To give a return suitable to yours is above what I am capable of, 
they so far exceed both the capacity and desert of, my Lord, your Lordship's 
humble servant, — Marqaebt Montoomerib.*' 

" Canongate, Nottmber 25, 1666."— iVo<<f hy Mr.Sharpe, 



/ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



273 



^ 

I 



were now speedily descried hy Creiglitoii, who had ascended 
a Bmall eminence, where (joined afterwards by Captain 
Graham) he was commanded to remain at a little cabin 
eituated near the epot where the road divided, that be might 
diecem clearly the choice of the rebels, which road they would 
take, or whether they would separate. Creighton jicrcoived 
that they took two different patha While one party moved 
to the Qallowgato bridge, the other proceeded by the High 
Church and College, which was a very strange manoeuvre, the 
latter route being twice as long aa the other, and thus the 
King's troops had an opportunity of defeating one body before 
the other could join it. Accordingly, about ten in the morn- 
ing, the Gallowgate party quickly swarmed into the High 
Street at the heels of Creighton and hia six dragoons, and 
advancing towards the barricade, fired without any effect. 
But Claverhouse, Lord Ross, Major White, and their troops, 
returning their fire, and jumping over the barricades at the 
same time, rout^^d them instaataucousiy, and chaRcd them out 
of the town. Meanwhile the other half of the Solemn League 
and Covenant " came whigging down the hill" on the other 
side ; but perceiving their friends discomfited, and being hotly 
cliargcd by the returning Boyalists, they also discreetly took 
to flight. In a field behind the High Church, however, as 
many of the rebels as were not concealed lu the houses of the 
Town's people, drew up in a knot, and there remained till 
about five o'clock in the aftemocm, when it was thought 
adviuablc to retire to a spot which they had occujjied the pre- 
ceding night, about a mile from the toi.vn of Glasgow, Cap- 
tain Graham, who had expected another attack on tlie town, 
discovering by his upica whither they hail gone, tunrchcd out 
after them. But the Presbyterians retreating with a strong 
rear guard of horse to Hamilton, he returned back wthout 
having cume to blows. After this skirmish it was reported, 
that somi; of his Majesty's officers philomphi<'allj/ betook them- 
Holvoa to the protection of the Tolbooth stair-case ; while, on 
the other hand, it was affirmed that Hamilton, the leader of 
the rebels, stopt very quietly into a house at the Gallowgatd 
bridge, and their remained iDRCtive till the retroat of hit 



18 



a74 MEMORIALS OF THE 

The whiga left the bodies of their slain companioBB, 
araounting to seven, behind them, extended on the streets of 
Glasgow. There they lay from eleven o'clock in the morning 
till nightfall, as Captain Graham and the other ojkert are 
said to have given orders that they aliould not be buried, but 
that the butchers' dogs should be suffered to devour them.' 
At last they were smuggled into houses, and attired for sepul- 

' [Had uiy mch brutal order been eirea, CapUin Creigbton, who certunl; did 
not teek (o soften hi* nnmttiTe, would liBve mentioned the fscl. Indeed, it rnkf 
tie gilbercd from Wodruw'a own accoDDt, tliat, in this imtance, ho vis TeeordiDg 
H ralgohDod. When th*t nnUiiRl.v historian rcfen to " pnpera" in liia paaBoaion, 
b; «>} uf Terifj'ing his calumniea, as lie so conatantl)' does vithont rurlliar di»- 
cloBoni of hi* worllilcxa authorities, lliero in every chance (as ve have already 
proTed) ttiat the production of thoeo papers would ddi liaie afforded the pretended 
verification. Bat when Wodrow reeorda BOne maniren caluinnir, nnder his niiul 
reference to " papers," fn pttle, at the mime lime aBecting a eaudid donbl in lus 
own mind whollicr euch things could poasihlj he true, we may rest asenred, that 
the nature of his bidden inronnation »aa such as to satisfy liimsvlf that it waa not 
(»<. The pamoge (o wliicli Mr Sharpc alludea (with a scep^ciem llial might bave 
been muoh more decidedly eicpretscd], ia as followa : — 

■■ Groat woi the iiihimaiiily of the soldiers lo llis drad bodia left in the (treela. 
/ fiitd KBu paptn asserting tliat Clarerhoun, and icmf of the oScen, gave order* 
llut none should bury them, but that tbe butchers' dogs should be suffered lo cm 
them, / can icarctly praaH icilA aytt!/ to Ibink there wore any etich ordcis 
given ; but it is eertain that tlie seven dead bodies Uy upon (he street rnnn devai 
of the dock till uight came on, and tbe common soldiers would not permit them lo 
be carried into hoUBe8,"^and so on with the rest of his nibbisli. — Hill. iii. 71. 
Wodrow seems to think that three ruthless rebels, who hud kilted so many of the 
King's troops at Drumdog, and had pursued them to Glasgow for the same pur- 
pose, afaould. In tbs very crisis iiud heat of their overthrow, bave been tmttad U 
tenderly as if they had been friends and allies ; and that, too, by tlic very soWera 
in whose henrt's-blood they were lliirsting lo imbrue their hands. Yet Wodrow 
himself fondly records these ruffiims as [egilimate " soldiers," who, only by a little 
mismanagement (which he greatly regrets), had failed upon tliis occasion to beeonM 
the supreme Government of Scotland t At Dramcloj;, he says, " Claverbouse ao4 
hia men were totally routed ; and it was tlie opinion of not a few, that if the coun- 
trymen hod padied Oieir mxfU, followed tlieir clinse, and gone straight lo Ghu- 
gow that day, they might easily, with such as might have joined them by the roul, 
upon the notice of their suecego, have dislodged (he soldieis, and very amn made > 
gnat ap}>aarajia." And, in reference lo their subsequent defeat, he says, " Thii 
discomfiture very much disheartened the raw and inexperienced toldltri." 

With regard lo tlie interferenrc with their funeral prooanoHi, in Die very crids 
of Iheir defeat, il must be kept in mind how, iu the hands of the Covenanters, such 
scenic displays were calculated to inflame the minds of the volgar, and render no- 
g»b>i7 the eiampto of their discomfiture.] 



! 



VISCOU-NT OF DUNDEE. 275 

ture; but the soldiers »tript them of their dead clotbe8, and so 
prodigious was thoir " uaughty barbarity," os Wodrow phrases 
it, that when some of the pious sisterhood (for the Presby- 
terian brethren dared not to peep forth) were carrying these 
inartyrs to their graves, the Royalists attacked the funeral 
procession, cut the pall with their swords, and took away the 
poles from the bier. 

On their return to Hamilton, tlie Presbyterians formed a 
sort of camp, and quickly behold their force increased by n 
great ooncourae of their persuasion from all quarters. Cap- 
tain Qraham, and Lord Boss, imagining that Glasgow would 
speedily receive from them a moro numerous ^nsit, resolved to 
repair to Stirling, where they might safely await the drawing 
together of the King's forces. On the 3(1 of June, therefore, 
they marched to Kilsyth, carrying several of the wounded 
prisoners with them in carts. But the day after, an order of the 
Privy Council reached them near Falkirk, by which they were 
commanded to halt until the Earl of Linlithgow's regiment, 
and other reinforcements from different quarters, should join 
them, when they were to march back again towards the whiga. 
On the 6th of June they were joined by Lord Linlithgow at 
LarWrt Muir. But while proceeding farther west, accounts of 
the surprising strength of the rebel army, said to amount to 
eight thousand men, arrived, and a council of war being held, 
it was fijially agreed to retire to Stirling, not only for the re- 
freshment of the wearied soldiers, — who, by the way, do not 
seem to have undergone any great fatigue, — but to attend the 
coming up of the foot militia, and the landholders of several 
shires, whom the Privy Council had ordered to join them in 
place of the horse militia. 

To this cautions plan, however. Captain Orahftm was ex- 
uoedingly averse, as it in no rOHpect suited either the courage 
or impetuosity of bin genius ;' and he offered with only a 
thousand borso and foot to march forward and dispose of the 

■ [Tlie poraial of CUverhoadi'* nwu lellera, roerntl}- Tvoorenxl, wonlil ha*« lad 
Mr Sharjv, anil will IcaJ ui; ouidid oDijulrvr, to the concliulou that he wu not 
UIidI; to Ml, an •erlous oecuiau, ii|wD the more impulw iif uiim*l courege, or the 
trnprtaotity nl bi* gcaiiu. Itlgfat or wmng,— and he waa mueli more freqqently 
HijUt Iliku H nniK,— li" tad dellbcnle rauona tor all Iw ever Jlil, ur advind lo b* 



276 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



relwls, or never to return alive. But his proposftls were not 
listened to, and tluH retreat eerved to inspire the whigB, to- 
gotlier with their former euccesscs, ■with a wonderful degree of 
confidence for a seaflon. 

Captain Creighton, in his memoirs, positively asserts that 
Graham was ordered by the Privy Council to evacuate Glas- 
gow ; and the author of tlie Memoirs of Dundee alleges that 
Lord Linhtbgow, when at Inchbclly bridge near Kilsyth, 
received a command from the Council not to proceed towards 
the insurgents. But I am inclined to adopt the above state- 
ment from what a]>pears to be better authority. Lord Lin- 
lithgow's force is said to have been a thousand foot, two hun- 
dred horse, and two hundred dragoons ; which, joined to the 
forces brought by Graham and Lord Ross from Glasgow, 
might easily have discomfited the numerous but ill armed 
Presbyterians. Yet the number of the rebels wero so greatly 
magnified by reports, and tlio King's officers, with the single 
exception of Claverhouse, were such household soldiers, so 
unaccustomed to the doubts, and all the duties of war, that 
the retreat to Stirling is by no means surprising, LiiUithgow, 
however, was much cried out against for the measure. While 
some alleged that it proceeded from cowardice, others attri- 
buted it to the craft of his party, who wished to vindicate the 
severities of Lauderdale by the success of the rebellion, and 
reap a ricli harvest of forfeitures after the heat of the war 
should decline.^ 

The body of the rebels now consisted of about eight thon- 
eand horse and foot. They drilled regularly, displayed all the 
insignia of war, and yielded implicit faith to their preachers ; 
who affirmed that God bad at length heard tlieir prayers, and 
delivered their enemies into their hands. Now, beautiful 
prospects of the new Jerusalem began to expand before their 
eyes. A gotlly reformation, watered with the blood of the 
Bishops, and their wicked followers, was ripening apace ; 
while, in every drum, in every banner, they heard or saw the 



■ [MuBl probaUf ■ liiBtorictI or politieai niylli, of whidi so 
tlic BUrfani uf histiir)', reUllve to the autira prunipling Uie o 
iiiun oF iliv liny. J 



iiany are SoMing on 

ailuDt uf the leading 



VISCOPNT OF DUNDEE. 



277 



I 
i 



Tcncrable parcliment of tlie League, exliortiug and waving 
them to strive nealouely for the gooii cause. 

Among tlie preacbers who were caplaius and chiefs of this 
rabble, appears Mas David Williamson, a person not a little 
celebrated in his generation, and on whom the well known 
Bcottish ballad of Dainty Davie iesaid to have been composed. 
The history of one of his escapes from the royal soldiers is 
very remarkable, and the occasion of that song. When Mas 
David was abiding at the house of one Murray of Cherrytrees, 
about ten miles from Edinburgh, a party of the King's guards 
under the command of Captain (then Lieutenant) Creighton, 
besot the place early in the morning, before any of the party 
had got notice of their approach. Mrs Murray, a good pious 
Boul, instantly got out of bed from her daughter, a girl about 
eighteen years of age, and attiring Davie's head in her own 
niglit-gear, made him take her place by the side of the young 
lady, while she went down to soften the hearts of the soldiery 
with liquor. The troopers proceeded to search the house ; 
but Miss Murray, pretending indisposition, merely raised her- 
self a httle in bed, so as to be seen, and conceal Wilhamsoii. 

It grieves mo to relate the issue of all this heroism. Alas ! 
tlio chosen vessel chanced to prove frail, and Mas David, to 
avoid greater scandal, was induced to marry her.' She was 

I [Tbis Biury is mucli inoro circunuUnliiUy lolJ in tlie couicmpanr;' [uiii|>hlet, 
ootitlod, "Tlio Svalcli Prmbflvrian EJoi^uence UixpUjed ; uT tlie Foullahusu uf 
tlieir TcHcbing dltcovered from tlieir Uouk*, Suruiouii, aud Prk^fcra ;'' lint iirililnl 
ia LondoD, in tlie yekr IGn2. Sue lite first weUoD, " Tlie True Chuvclcr of tlM 
Pniab} Icriun Pmslon and Pmiile in Sculluiil," (p. 5,] fur lliii nd scaudkl agunit 
tlu DrnviiJ WUluuDSDii. Tbe autlwr adda, — " Tliim whalo slur; ia u well kuown ilk 
tHMtluDd aa tlutl tlie Coreiuuit waa beguD aud carried oo by rvbollian andoppmHon." 
Sn HKb'rant and circumatantial a auandal Mai not likeljr tu be publi*bo<l,ai> aooa aftor 
thu event, anil daring tba tint yeaxa oT King William's ruign, liad it Dot been ITiw. 
Captain Civighloo alan mnrda the alary u a nolorioiu fact, and aJdi,— " TUii 
WUIianuon married five or nix oitca (UCEenively, and waa ajiie in tlw nrfga uf 
Qucsn Anne, at mliioh lime 1 «<• lutn preaching in ouuuf tbe kirk* uf K-liuhurgli." 
Tlie Scolcli aong of ■■ Oaini; Davio,"— Uie wurda uf nhlch, aaya Sir Walter Soott, 
" are nther more faccllcoa than dolIcal«,"— U finuided va tha laeident. The tcaa- 
dal was naior oanltvdlclod. In Wodruw'a AitaUvIa, vol. 1. p. 13, (he fulluwing 
■unvna occnni ■' ITCi, Febniary 27.— Thi* night GUiidriiten told metliai it oaa 
ivjiurted far a truth at Dorruwatuwuuea* thai about aii wvolia alnee Mr Itevid WU- 
liaiUBUii wat proacblng in Itl* uwn chunh in KdUibar)[li, aud in tiie iiiiildlo of the aer- 
niun a ndtoa (rat) raliiv i>ii>l ut d<'Wu >ui liia bible. Tbia iiiad* hlui atu]', aud after a 



278 MEMORIALS OF THE 

the first of four or five wives whom this Abraham successively 
took to his bosom. King Charles is reported to have expressed 
his surprise at Williamson's disregard of danger, and to have 
affirmed, that while sheltered in the Boyal Oak, he would not 
have cared to kiss the bonniest lass in Christendom. 

To return to our history. The Privy Council of Scotland 
exerted great energy throughout in the measures they adopted 
to suppress the rebellion. Besides calling out the militia of 
the loyal counties, and commanding the attendance of the 
landed gentlemen on horseback, with as many followers as 
they could muster, the train-bands of the City of Edinburgh 
were sent to the army, and an express dispatched to London, 
requiring a body of English troops to be sent down to Scot- 
land immediately. The passages of the river Forth were 
secured, military stores seized in the name of Government, 
and the fortification and supply of Edinburgh and Stirling 
Castles diligently attended to. In all these measures the 
Duke of Lauderdale certainly co-operated sincerely with the 
Privy Council, and he is supposed greatly to have rejoiced in 
the insurrection. Wilmot, Earl of Eochester, in a letter to 
his friend Henry Saville, says, — " Now the war in Scotland 
takes up all the discourse of politick persons. His Grace of 
Lauderdale values himself upon the rebellion, and tells the 
King it is very auspicious and advantageous to the drift of the 
present Councils." Eochester adds, — " The rest of the Scots, 
and epecially Duke Hamilton, are very inquisitive after the 
news from Scotland, and really make a handsome Jigure in 
this conjuncture at London/* It was suspected, and by many 
affirmed, that the Earl of Shaftesbury, and the English whigs, 
had a great concern in the breaking forth of the Scottish re- 
bellion. Shaftesbur/s celebrated speech concerning Scotland, 
was certainly much circulated in that country. On a perusal 
of it now, one cannot perceive those touches of oratory that 
were once esteemed so convincing ; but it is amusing to ob- 

little pause ho told the congregation that this leof a mesBoge of €hd to kim ; and 
broke ofT his sermon, and took a formal farewell of his people, and went home, and 
continues sick." This is one of Wodrow's << remarkable providences about Scotch 
clergj'men." A rat, however, is rather a singular messenger from Heaven.] 



I 






VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 271) 

seiTfl how ilexterously tlie wily statesman caught tbe spirit of 
Scots whig fleclamation, anil cliimed in to the Presbyters in 
their own key, with & quotation from their beloved 8ong of 
Solomon. Talking of the Scottish, Irish, anil French Pro- 
t«8tant Churches, he repeatc^d, — " We have a little sister, and 
ehe hath no breasts," &c. ; and said, that these were l/ieir sisters. 
Now. the Calviniets, and Scottish whlga, were ever remarkably 
fond of Solomon's amatory effusion. In the Geneva Bible of 
1576, it is termed a most sweet and comfortable allegory. Sir 
Thomas Hope of Craighall rendered it into latin verse, which 
he dedicated, in a poetical address, to Charles the First, while 
Prince of Wales ; and in all the prayers, sermons, and exhor- 
tations of the whigs, during tliat and the succeeding reign, 
we meet with luscious quotations from the Canticles in almost 
every sentiment,' 

' See Ratherford** LcHcri pauim ; and more GspeoUlly .Mr Julm Welsh's Lotter 
fruiD BUckneM to Duno Liliu FlemiDg, Countew of Wigton. 

In ■ ridicuruuB book called Rarleigk lUdirim, or tbe Life kdd Dnlli of the 
Right Honaunble Aathonjr Ule Earl of ShaTteBbary (ICDS), humbly ileilloated lo 
Uw pntatiMi/ L/irds (at the lickd of wham ipiHiBrB the Duke of Monmauth), we 
hite toine euriotu iegenda reapeoting this P(«r. We ara told tbat Lailjr Abrr- 
gavennj, and the Countea* of Powia (oflerwarda Ducliess, and mnther to tlia eele- 
bntcd CouuleiB of Nithadali-,) eoDtrived way* to have SliaflMbury ■nn»in»lTil. 
and act Duigerfielil, tha UMal-tub-mBn, about it. But hia heart twice failing him 
00 tbe very eoo ef porforoiance, Mra Gillier, the Popiah midvifo, rosolvod to strike 
the blow, — <■ hoping," aaya the biographer, ■■ tu give liiiu n wound aoniewhat more 
(ktal tbao that which ehu had fonoerly given to aonio othera of our sex." Bnt 
after gaining aduiitlance to the Eari, and begioning to fumble in ber pocket for the 
dagger, hia Iiordnhlp dratlod eo pleaaantly on the bnainees she pretended to come 
about, and twice laid hia band upon hen so apropoi, tbat aho waa very luncb 
Ironbled, dashed, and put out of counlenanoe, and retired without having executed 
ber purpoau. Tbe alory of tkt Tay, which fumiahed such food fur Tory utin.', ia 
thero monlioiied, from which Collin*, ftrlKUim, tranecribed it ; and we loaru from 
the CDDcluiuon of the lioak, that after Sbafteabury'a dontb, liia body wai wrappiHl 
in Cfra-olotb, and (ben in lead, — " all but his head and faop, whereon he had nothing 
aave one of the poriwiga he luod ID wear in bis lifetime ; and in that nuuiDer he 
waa laid in a rioh caBIn, in the head whereof, just over the Furl's face, waa placed 
a eryatal gUta, wlicreby every one that pleaaed might view hii faai ; irhieh, to the 
admiration of all tliat aaw it, appeared aa froah and bcautifiil aa when ho waa living, 
nor wa* there any oonuderable alteration to be diaecriiod therein." 

Sliafteebury had the follv to affirm that Cromwell would have made him King of 
EncUnd, a draiinalanco which, even if triK, he ihuuld not liavo told, ae he might 
have bocn aura that nobody would boUcvc the fact. It waa prutcnded tlial bo at 
to be cIfcIaI King of Puland ; and thu Tunea dubbing lilin with 



280 MEMORIALS OF THE 

On the 10th of June (1679) the Master of Ross encoun- 
tered, near Selkirk, a party of rebels from Fife, of about a 
hundred and fifty men, going to join the main body. These 
he defeated by the Water of Grala, killing nearly sixty, and 
taking ten prisoners, who were sent into Edinburgh on the 
11th. This was called the skirmish of Bewly Bog ; and the 
author of Lord Dundee's memoirs^ ascribes the command of 
the royal party to him; asserting that the number of the rebels 
was three hundred and fifty, well armed, while that of the 
King's forces was but forty horse, and as many dragoons. 
But Lord Ross's letter, read to the Privy Council on the 11th 
June, proves this statement to be erroneous. 



Uld: ^|jfttttctiW|li 



the title of King Tapiki, composed many puquihi on the future sovereign. In a 
witty account of his election, it is declared that the Diet ** sent Polish deputies 
incognito, with the imperial crown and sceptre in a cloak-bag to him. Old Blood 
smelt it from Bishopsgate Street, when they alighted at his lodgings, and had it not 
been for an old acquaintance and ancient friendship between King Anthony the 
elect (for now I must call him so) and himself, I am credibly informed be had laid 
an ambush for it at the G>ck alehouse by Temple Bar, where some thirty indigent 
bullies were eating stuft beef helter-skelter at his charge, on purpose to stand by, 
and assist him in carrying off the booty." — Note by Mr Sharpe, 

» [Mr Sharpe here refers to those nearly contemporary, but very slight and im- 
perfect Memoirs of Dundee, •« by an Officer of the Army,** mentioned before, p. 1 1 8, 
note.} 



^^^^H^H VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 281 

^^V [Thus abmptly conclude^) Mr Sharpe'a Memoriala of Dundee, 

^^M his times and his coutem[)oraries, in so for as be had written 

^^H them fairlj out, transferred from a confused mass of loose 

^^M sheets, and slireds of manuscript, into a paper book, bearing 

^^H no title, and no date. The remaining papers, which we are 

^^* also 80 fortunate as to have acquired recently, consist for the 

most part of notes, extracts, and isolated passages, jotted in 

a desultory but industrious manner upon whatever camo to 

hand ; such as hacks of letters, and old receipts, — as if in those 

days literary men laboured under a dearth of paper. As one 

of these scraps exhibits, upon the reverse side, not only a date, 

but a morsel of our accomplisliod author's own biography, by 

indicating his education at Oxford, we may give it here : — 

" Chablbs Sharpk, Etq. To Kicuard Grbbn. 

" For Michaelmas and Cliriitmas QiiarUsra, 1607, Uiiivcraitv 

Duel, &f., iO U 3 

"for Ladj-dav Qunrtors. 1607, BuUcIs nn(l DacrcmvDD, tj 6 8 

£7 Oil 
" May 25. 1807. 

" Received the Conlentt, 

" BlCUAKU GUKEN." 

It is, doubtless, a cliaracteristic of genius to secure, at the 
moment, a happy thought, or a suddouly remembered fact, hy 
noting it on tlie material nearest the hand, though it were tho 
thumb-nail at kirk or market, The school-room of a gentle- 
man's bouse in the north of Scotland was at one time decorated, 
I or perhaps, as then considered, disfigured, by an appendage to 
the wall, of a crooked wire upon which a young domestic 
tutor waH wont hastily to impale, from time to time, sundry 
odd pieces of paj>er, of various shapes and si/os, all patiently 
waiting t« be " written out." Tho pupil of that school-room, 
(an esteemed friend and relativo of the author of these pages), 
into whom a reading turn had certainly not been instilled, con- 
Kidered himself excused, in aft«r life, from any obligation to 
read the Plviuura of Hope, since he had watched tho growing 
bulk of it, haiigiii;: on Mint crtxjked wire in the ncluwl-ro-jMi, 



282 MEMORIALS OF THB 

until his eyes grew sick at the sight of Hope deferred. His 
then tutor was Thomas Campbell. 

That the loyal and cavalieresque lucubrations of Mr Sharpe 
had commenced very early in the century, is proved by other 
separate scraps of manuscript, which fortunately bear a date. 
The following passages very distinctly indicate the young 
Oxonian's ultimate object, in these researches : — 

" July, 1808. — The conviction that a character which we 
admire or reverence labours under misrepresentation and 
obloquy, is a very painful feeling to most men, more especially 
if their favourite principles, civil and religious, suffer at the 
same time. This, more than the vast avidity with which 
memoirs, and indeed biography of every description, are 
now sought aftur, emboldened the author of the following 
sheets to submit them to the judgment of the public. From 
the life of John Graham, Viscoimt of Dundee, however im- 
perfectly composed, much may be learnt ; for in his success 
we may perceive what prodigies can be effected by manly 
perseverance and unshaken courage, — and, in his ill fortune, 
how slight the greatest human efforts prove against the 
decrees of that wise providence, which, for its own good ends, 
disposes of conquerors and of crowns contrary to all the short- 
sighted presumptions of frail mortality. 

" The prejudices of party would very lately have rendered 
any attempt towards a life of Viscount Dundee an invidious 
luidertaking. At present these prejudices have declined with 
the unhappy race of men that gave birth to them ; and a 
biographer may bestow all due i)raise on the talents, fidelity, 
and valour of a Jacobite, without incurring the stigma of par- 
tiality, or tlie suspicion of extravagant notions of regal prero- 
gative. From his earliest infancy Dundee was taught the 
high notions of loyalty that flamed in those days, but which 
the freezing streams of philosopliy have now so entirely ex- 
tinguished. The fate of his gallant cousin the Marquis of 
Montrose was held up to him, to instill a detesta-tion of the 
puritan principles, and his example served to nourish all the 
seeds of fidelity and courage in his bosom. In him, he saw 
the elegant scholar identified with the hardy warrior, and he 
I)anted to emulate his brilliant acquirements. In the person 



^H|H^^^H VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 283 

of Dundee great beauty was joined to streugth and agilitj, he 
was an experienced horseman, and excelled in all other manly 
exercises. But the whigs drew the ijorlraits of tliesc " bloody 
persecutors," as they called them, in the most terrific colours, 
beiglitening their pretended cruelty with all the horrors of the 
national superstition. Their saliva burnt where it fell ! The 
wine raised to their lips became clotted gore I' Their feet 
caused to boil the watar in which they were immersed I They 
rode over rocks, and through pools, on infernal coursers, wear- 
ing shirts of proof, and other spells to resist gim-shot I And 
they ferreted out the miserable fugitives by the aid and in- 
spiration of Salan, to whom they had delivered up their souls 
for success in these murderous operations 1 The Biahopa had 
no shadows ! ! On the other hand, the ministfrs possessed the 
gift of propliecy, and an infallible power of curses, or of bene- 
dictions." 

From Mr Sharpe's Sibylline leaves we may cull two other 

' In 1685, ao cxemliou *m comviUlitl n-hieli prodnnrd one of lliose miraclm tu 
whieli man;' of the whig« (prompted bj' the convoatlcic prvtcliera) ^ve implicil 
belief. A fellow uf the rinme of Willutu Smith, ia llic parish of Gleaaum in 
Niihsdalc, had been Hiied by Ilic officer of llie gairiBon ■! Kailloch, and bohavcd so 
obatinateijr aa his examJiutlau, that Sir Robert Lawrio at Maiwelloii, ■ rery la.val 
gcDllonuu), pToaounced, ■■ a CommiMioner, the ncDtence of death upon him.' It 
HaaoD Ux day of Itia own daughter CbUu^iid'i mnrriage to Mr Cordoa of Shirroen ; 
and ll>e father of IIm criminal, a tenant of Haxwelloa's, applied lu the yonng 
lady, begeeching her la reqamt the life of hia ion, >■ a marriage bono from Sir 
Robert. It waa Uionglit that ber intereeHion wonld prevail ; but *Iib reaolnlely 
refuned to maLo aaj, and William waa ahot on the rarc-niuir, by a party of sol- 
diere, that eTening. Sit Robert lat at table ; he called fur a Cup of uiiie, and 
putting it to hia lipa, korretco rtfmiit, foand llie liquor meiaroarphoaed into d-ttltd 
htood I " Fiuaque in obicenum m vertore rina cniorem." The kiwc U-jcnd la 
adapted to eondry of the perMcntori, and doubllua witb tlie game truth ; but (heae 
beroragea of horror are remarkable, inaamuoh aa tlioy exhibit to »hat extreniea 
cnlbuaiaalie emdulity eauld be maile lu soar, oven at eo Lalu a periml ae llie reign uf 
King Jama the ScTODth. — ^olif bf Mr Stuirji: 

[It mnal alao be remarLed that tlieae wipentitione, inth which tlie covenanting 
aonala abfinnd, were nai ilie mnre Ignorant guMip of ibe vulgar, but wnrn deli- 
beraloly recorded by the AirttrriaM of lb« Covenant, incloding Wodrow hiniaelf, 
u if aOunling yntft uf their groMi (•Inmnie*, while in bet such illuetralioua 
lendeJ to expow the falxity. And heneo it wa* that Sir Waller Scolt wan in- 
daml to oxeUim, — " Yon can hardly coneoive tlie perfidy, cruelty, and tsfiditj 
uf tlioae people, according bi iIip a«M>aate tbey have UwmHlvoa preserved." See 
^^^ b«fi>re, p. IC7.t 



284 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Sections of his contemplated Memoirs of Dundee: The next 
prominent event that falls to be narrated by him, is the de- 
feat of the insurgent fanatics at Bothwell Bridge, in which he 
follows closely the minute and very graphic details furnished 
to Dean Swift by old Captain Creighton, one of Claverhouse's 
most efficient officers upon that memorable occasion. From 
that source, too, we must supply an unfortunate hiatus in the 
manuscript of Mr Sharpe, occurring between his account of 
the skirmish at Glasgow, after the affair of Drumclog, and 
where we again take up the thread of his narrative, in medias 
res of tlie battle at the bridge.] 



[Section VI. — Defeat of the Fanatics at Bothwell Bridge^ and 
the immediate consequents thereof to the Army of Mar- 
tyrs, — Executions of Kid and King, Cameron and Cargill, 
Isabel Alison and Marion Harvie. — Outrages justifying 
these severities.] 

[" The Council, finding the rebels daily increasing in their 
numbers, gave information thereof to the King ; whereupon his 
Majesty sent down the Duke of Monmouth with a commission 
to be Commander-in-Chief, and to take with him four troops 
of English dragoons, which were quartered on the borders. 
But these, with the forces in Scotland, amounted not to above 
three thousand. Upon the Duke's being made Commander- 
in-Chief, Greneral Dalziel refused to serve under liim, and re- 
mained at his lodgings in Edinburgh till his Grace was super- 
seded, which happened about a fortnight after. The army 
was about four miles forward, on the road towards Hamilton, 
when the Duke of Monmouth came up with his English dra- 
goons, on Saturday the 21st of June (1679). From thence the 
whole forces marched to the Kirk of Shots, within four miles 
of the rebels, where they lay that night. The next morning he 
marched the army up an eminence, opposite to the main body 
of the enemy, wlio were encamped on the moor. The Gene- 
ral officers, the Earl of Linlithgow, Colonel of the Foot-Guards, 
the Earl of Mar, Colonel of a regiment of foot, Clavers, the 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



285 



I 
I 



Earl nf Ilumo, and the Earl of Airly, all captains of horse, the 
Marquis of Montrose,' Colonel of the Horse-Guards, Atbole 
having been discarded. Dalhousie, with many other noble- 
men and gentlemen volunteers attending the Duke together, 
desired his Grace to let them know which way be designed 
to take to corao at the enemy ? The Duke answered, it must 
be by Bothwoll Bridge. Now the bridge lay a short mile to 
the right of the King's army, was narrow, and guarded with 
three thousand of the rebels, and strongly barricaded with 
great stones ; but, although the officers were desirous to have 
passed the river by easy fords, directly between them and the 
rebels, and to march to their main body on the moor, before 
those three thousand who guarded the bridge couhl come to 
assist Ihem, yet the Duke was obstinat*, and would pass no 
other way than that of the bridge. 

" Pursuant to this preposterou.t and absurd resolution, he 
commanded Captain Stewart (whoso Lieutenant I was), with 
his troop of dragoons, and eighty musqueteers, together with 
four small field-pieces, under cover of the dragoons, to beat 
off the party at tlie bridge. The Duke himself, with David 
Lesly and Melvil, accomjianied us, and ordered the field-pieces 
to ho Itft at the village of Bothwell, within a musket sliot of 
the bridge. When the Duke and his men came near the 
bridge, the rebels beat a parley, and sent over n laird, accom- 
panied viith a kirk preacher.' The Duke asking what they 
came for, was answered — ' That they would have the Kirk 
establisbcd in the same manner as it stood at the King's re- 
storation, and that everj/ subject should bo oblirfcd to take the 
Solemn League and Covenant.' The Duke told them their 
command could not bo granted ; but sent them back to tell 
their party, that if they would lay down their arms, and sub 



' [ The letter ip which lh« ynang Marquis of ModItdh hi gimccfullj urgm his 
distingiuKhMl owlet lo Rcwpl of the coainiiiuian oT Lieutenant iinilnr liim, m Cap. 
tain of > ltw>|i iir myal giwrdii, lo bf> niiwil in SentlanJ, in dalod 3J Fcbruarj' of 
tliat iM.n\t yr, I<1TS The hopo of promotion which that Ipttpr held out had Iwen 
>{>rvdily fulfiltvd. In the following j'ear, wc And Montrnac in pgtnmanJ ut 
(he IUipv-GuardiaaColonrl,aDd ClivorhooK a leading and nwai prooiiueul cii|>- 

inofhort*. See before, p ISS,] 

• [TheH weTe Pergnaon of Caitlodi.and Ma* Uarld lliime | 



zoo UEJUORIALS OF TDK 

mit to the King's mercy, he wonld iutcrc&le for their par- 
don,*]' 

On the return of their missionaries from the Duke, the re- 
bels continued their altercations with redoubled violence; 
during which the fleld-pieccB of the Royalists were planted on 
the eastern side of the river, to cover tlie attack of the Foot- 
Guards, who assaulted the bridge under the command of Lord 
Livingston, eldest sou to the Earl of Linlithgow. Hackston, 
the murderer, maintained his post with sufficient obetinacj 
for nearly an hour;* but all his ammunition being expended, 
and no Buccoiir afforded by Oeiieral Hamilton, he unwillingly 
relinquished the bridge, and retreated to the main body, now 
wisely engaged in cashiering their officers, and appointing 
fresher fools in their ])lace8. The Duke's army, with their 
cannon in front, crossed the bridge, and drew up in line of 
battle, Monmouth commanding the foot, and Captain Orabam 
the horse. The cannon now began to play, and its discharge 
completely discomfited the cavalry of the (Covenanters ; who, 
wheeling round in prodigious confusion, overthrew and tramp- 
led upon their pedestrian companions. The Duke, from a de- 
sire for popularity, and perhaps a tenderness of disposition 
not very well suited to the emergency of the times, prevented 
much slaughter of the insurgents, though four hundred fell in 
the pursuit. Captain Graham esteemed this, itl-timed cle- 
mency; and General Dalyell, who arrived in the camp the 
day after, with a commission to supersede the Duke as Com- 
mander-in-Chief, publicly chid his Grace for his compassion, 
telling him that he had betrayed the King, and declared that 
if his own commission had come but one day sooner, these 
rogues should never more have troubled his Majesty, or the 
country. 

In the rebel camp was found a high gallows, with a cart 
full of new ropes at the foot of it, the destination of which 
was but too well imderstood; and it is remarkable enough, 
that these instnunents of edification were not turned against 
the whigs by the other party, although they had secured 

' [Captain CreighMn's kcconnt.] 

* [Tho scoundrel wu fightiog witb a ropa round his nock, lie CBurcd tliu iraxU 
a( taaay a deludEd mui, besides mordaring the Prininle.) 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUKDEF. 287 

among the prisoners sundry persona long before (yullawed for 
rebellion.' Among the rest was Mas John Eidtl, a celebrated 
preacher, afterwards hanged in Edinburgh, whither he waa 
carried in great triumph, and made a gazing stock (fiaya the 
author of the Scots Worthies), in the places through which he 
passed, particularly at Corstorphine, from which, all the way to 
Edinburgh, both sides of the road were lined with people who 
were most " bitter and maiicioue" against them. The circum- 
fitanco'of the gallows is also mentioned by Guild, in his Bd- 
Inm BothueUianum ; and by the anonymous author of an 
Englinh (or rather Scottish) poem, composed on the eome, 
entitled, " A Short Compend or Description of the Rebels in 
Scotland, in anno 1679, by a well-wisher of his Majesty, pub- 
lished by Authority : Edinburgh, printed in tlie year 1681." 

■' Dut wliCQ thuir foot iliil take the flight, 
To niHko escape witU ull their might, 
Some mn to holes, lonie to the height. 

With Dinny a walkway. 
The HighlsndcTs did i|iiickly follow. 
In victory them up to bwhIIow, 
Cniued many id their b1oo<I to wallow. 

Crying, alace ! that day. 

They wcro eommitted to the guard, 

Expeeting but a bad reward. 

That gallowi which Ihaiaetva }rrtpareit 

Their captives oa to hbg ; — 
To that same pallowo were they brought. 
Where all of them crpccUd nought 
But, Ilntnan-likc, up to be caught, 

A punishmcDt coudign." 

MoreoTer, in the Memoirs of the Rev. Mr Blackadder, the 
prisoners are said to have been " all gathered together about 

■ [* The cruelty and prceninptlan of that wicked and perrersc generation, will 
a[^)aar evident from a tingle iaMance. These rebeli had set up a very lai^ gal- 
lova in the middle of llidr camp, and prepared a carl full of new ropoi at the Tout 
of il, in order to iiaug up the KinR'a »ldier*, whom iliey already looked opon aa 
tanqolalieUi and at laeroy ; and It happened that the pamien in the royal army, 
reluming back with their priaonere, eboae tha place where the gallowi alood, to 
^ard them at, without oScriog to hang one of them, wbieh they juaUy deaervad, 
and had K> mudi reaaon to expeof— Cni^l»n.\ 



288 UEHOIUALS OF THE 

a gallows which stood there." This, if not erected by thi 
whigs, must have been the gibbet of an esjiosed malefactors 
which is not probable. Wodrow takes no notice of the i 
ports concerning the gallows and ropea, though they must 
have come within hia knowledge, but says, that the prisonera 
after Bothwell, were treated on their way to Kdinbnrgh in an-' 
inhuman manner: — " When they wore come to Corstorphine, 
within two miles of Edinburgh, great multitudes came out of 
the town to stare and gaze upon them. Both side^of thfts 
road were lined with peojjle, and some of them were most b 
ter and maliciova in their jesting, and reproaching the pri 
soiiers as tijey went by. Too many of that profane mob fol^ 
lowed the pattern of the old mockers literally, and said,- 
' Where ia now your God ? Take him up now ; and Mr Welcl 
who said, you should win the day ?' — that good man had I 
such expression."* Mr Welch was accused of having affitmec 
that the very tvindU-straws would fight for the good cauM 
and in all probability he did say so, though Wodrow deniec 
it, He also thinks fit to disbelieve tlie word " No quarter,^ 
given by. Hamilton at Druraclog, which HamiUon him 
acknowledged ; and he terms the murder of a butcher i 
Glasgow, a mahcious untruth, though Bussell (one of thoj 

■ [But that " good msn," Ma* Wodron' bimtieH', had be been tlicre lo *ee (and 
pilv lio WBH nol), would have propliosied victorj beforehand, gnaahed his leetfa 
over the defeat thereafter, and most probably have testilied in the Grawmarket aa 
the coDc1u«ou. His judgment on the raault full/ juUitica the impulalioa : — 
" Never wiih a good eaiut and poKiiiit armg, generally apeaking, hearty and boldi I 
wonm mana^d,' ftc— i/i»t. iii. 107. Then, ae for the " people," — " bitter and hi 
licioua," — " that profaoB moh," — were not these the people of Scotland 1 WbU ] 
then becomes of the aationaliti/ of the " good cause I" Mr Sliai-po gives, and fn 
Uiaalory oflhupaWuiTf, iuanole to bis publicatioa of the usaasHD Jnmes Ruaaeir*'! 
Account ol the Murder of Archbishop Sharp, printed at the eud of Kirkton'a Uia> J 
tory, p. 170. The modem editar of WoiItiiw sets rid of the ugly clrcumstsnee wiUi T 
all Ihe boldnoss of Wodrow himself. In the face of Creighloii's narrative, aodths J 
ballad written immediately after tlie event, wbieb expreaaly Mates Ihe fact, he aay*^ 1 
that Wodrow omitted it, because " he pnibibiy held it in such contempt as ti 
unworthy nf notice : the report is nbsolulely wilhout fimndatinii," Ac. ; and sa | 
Wodrow'B editor prefen and recommends " Dr M'Crit't Wrti" on Iho mibjecl !- 
Nut, iii. 107. Wodrow was not the chronicler lo hold any saeb iacideiil in coi 
lerapt. He was more apt to hold truth in eoutcrapt, or it least in defiance. N< 
it was one of those dctaiis, wiiich wonld not serve for " »ggi»T»ting Ihe erfmes ( 
our enemies."— See before, p. 59.] 




3 




I 



VISCODMT OF DrSDEE. 28'J 

Arcbbisliop's murilerers), expressly miiiil ions that circumstauce 
ill his narrative. 

About this time also, the gallaut ftlas John King was 
apprehended by Captain Crcighton, These preachers pre- 
sented a joint petition to the Conncil for mercy, Hie terms of 
which prove that they thought it quite lawful to deny both 
their principles and their practice, on particular occasions. 
King declares, " that his being in company with the robcla did 
proceed from no rebellious principle ; but being taken prisoner 
by ClaverhoQse and his party, he ordered him to be bound in 
cords ; and, after that Clavcrhouso and liis party had retired 
from Loudon Hill, he was found by the rebeb in that posture, 
and detained almost still a prisoner by them until the defeat, 
and not suffered to go from them ; so that in effect he was 
always in the quality of a prisoner; that during the time he 
was with them, he not only refused to preach, but was so far 
from encouraging them to rebellion, that he made it his work 
to persuade them to return to their former loyalty and obedi- 
ence; and de facto persuaded aeverale to go from and desert 
them ; that, albeit he had sometimes a sivord about him, yet 
he never offered to make use of the same, directly or indirectly, 
or to make any resistance to authority ; and that be only car- 
ried a sword to disguise himself, that be might not be taken 
for a preacher ; and he did make his escape be/ore the engage- 
ment.' 

Kid alleged, " that he did not only retire from them (the 
rebels) how soon ho hoard of his Majesty's proclamation, but 
wht-n some of them came to hie house, to persuade him to re- 
turn, he absolutely refused ; that he continued at his own 
house, and always exhorted such of the rebels as came to him, 
to lay down their arms and supplicate fur purdon ; that At the 
desire of them that were most peaceable, he went, in ike *int- 
plicity of his heart, to Hamilton, to persuade thom to obedience, 
and for no other end or account whntsomever ; that, when 
Robert Hamilton, and some other of the ringleaders, became 
onragi'd wilh the iHititioniT's prmenble advire, he came on hi» 
joorney homeward, and was purftuod by a party of the rebels, 
who threatened to kill him if he would not retom ; neither 
hail liL' auv armn, tmt a short sword to di«ga!ae Xi'nnsAi from 
19 



290 1IEMORIAL5 or THS 

being known as a prea^rber ; that both the pHBoneTS. with 
others, had go far prevailed with the moEt part of the vebek. 
that if his Majesty's foroes had forborne to assault for two 
bonrs longer, they had alL or most part of them^ eubmitled 
and 3rield€^'' 

This petition, which greatly vexes the npn^t spirit of 
Wodrow, was of no avaiL They were tried, condemned, and 
erentnally ordered for execution, after the most ample time 
had been allowed them to petition for their lives, a petition his 
Majesty refused. Mr Kid had still a conceit left him in his 
misery, — a miserable conceit ; for, walking hand in hand with 
King towards the scaffold, he said, — *' 1 have often heard and 
read of a kid sacrificed, but I seldom or never heard of a hing 
made a sacrifice." It is said that great wits have short 
memories. This gallows punster had forgotten King Charles 
^he First.* 

Wodrow, with great impudence, asserts that, till the spring 
of the year 1679, no unsafe doctrine could be charged upon 
the field-preachers ! This foolish fellow believed in Dr Gates, 
when he said that shoals of papists were daily sent to Scotland. 
And yet Fox says his credit is unimpeachable ! He is one 
continued lie, respecting the peaceable doctrines preached by 
the whigs, as their own printed sermons and declarations 

> [The Rer. Master Robert Law, sorely not Ukely to do injustioe to his fellow 
kbourer, Master Kid, gives a yery different accoant of him, from his petitioii. 
^ Mr Welsh, and some ministers with him, were for decbuing for the Kimg*» in- 
terest, according to ike Cotcnant, Robert Hamilton, their governor, with Mr Kid^ 
Mr Dongas, two probationers, and others that followed their way, were for <ftf- 
daiming the King and his interetU, All could not avail with Mr CargiU, Kid^ 
Douglas, and other itiUeu men among them, to hearken to any propotaU of peace.** — 
LatB^i Memoriali, p. 150. This was the dissension to which Wodrow, mnlium 
gementt attributes the defeat of those demented and doomed criminals at Bothwell. 
Creighton's account of his capture of the fugitive King is extremely graphic. He 
was guided in the pursuit by a peasant's description of him as '^ a braw, muckle 
carle, wiUi a white hat on him, and a great bob of ribands on the cock o't" He 
offered a plea ad mitcricordiam to that bold dragoon, which was as little likely to 
h% successful in that quarter, as his petition founded un his false plea of innocence. 
lit had seduced Lady Cardross's waiting-woman of the name of Creighton, and sib 
to the dragoon ; who hinisclf informs us, that King ** entreated me to show him some 
favour, beoauMO he had married a woman of my name : I answered, — * That is true, 
but flmt you got hor with bairn, and shall now pay for difpi-aeing one of mv 
nnme.' ^^—Memoirt, p. 140. Sec before, p. 269.] 



/ 






VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 291 

prove. And furtlicr, for miiny uf Woilrow's " aiithorities," 
they were hut narratives drawn up by the criminal wbigs 
theraselvoa, or their descendanta. lie often calls lUose who 
were killed, choice and ptofu yoatlis I He " wonders" they 
went not far greater lengths ! I' 

It was in the year 1G79, before the murder of Archbishop 
Sbarpe, and the battle of Bothwell Bridge, that some whigs 
enveigled one Major Johnstone, a man who had bcou active 
in apprehending delinquents of their sect, into a house of a 
woman of the persuasion, and beat and abused him most 
cnieliy; dischargiug guns at him, and wounding liim with 
BWords very dangerously. Wodrow says that he is well as- 
sured that the whole was but a, jest, John Knox, however, 
convinces ua, that the jokes of that party had something very 
serious at bottom. Cardinal Beaton, and this Mt^or, and many 
others, found it "jesting that was not convenient." Theirs 
was a strain of merriment somewhat like that of the Emperor 
Commodus, who cut off noses in his merry vein, Sborlly after 
this, there was another piece of mirth executed of the same kind. 
A conventicle at Cumberhead, in the parish of Xicuhmahago, 
having routed the party of soldiers sent to dissipate them, the 
whigs became still more insolent than before, and resolved to 
make short work with their enemies. Three foot soldiers of 
Captain Maitland's company being ijuartercd on a man near 
Ijoudon Hill, who would not pay the cees, or tax to Govern- 
ment, behaved themselves quietly for ten days, having com- 
passion on the man, who was in an ill stato of health. Yet 
his wife, or woman servant, threatened them with evil should 
they not remove ; and were answered that they remained there 
by order, and could not remove until they were commanded 
so to do, or the man would jiay his cess. On Saturday, April 
19, one of the soldiers went to Neu'mills, and luckily for him- 

Iself remained there all night; for on Sunday morning about 
two o'clock, ten fanatics, choosing the Lord's day, doubtless for 
BO pious a work, boaot the bam where the soldiers lay, and 
fu 
U, 
So< 



' (Sbo Vfndrow, iii. 504. How much f»nlior would lie h«<re had Uicw miienblp 
fuMlioi go, than tnunlcHnft tlio Arehtnahup, unci all lojalUu upoa *b>'m (Iw? rrnild 
lay their eumrdly haod*, and tb«ir atiempl, in arrni, lo poaoi thcmaclm ot liir 
Sovenipi pawn- In SeolUnil I ChirUa Shaqx had raJly itiidicd W»dm«, and 
farmed • Jinter eMuuM at him tluui Charlo* Vux liad Juna."] 



292 MEMOBULS OF THE 

kuocked loudly at the door. One of tlic men, thinking it 
hiB comrade from NenTnills, arose in his shirt, and openii 
the door, started back at sight of the villains without ; who, 
exclaiming " come out you damned rogues," shot him dead 
upon the spot. The other soldier now got up, and rusliing to 
the door, received a wound from a bullet in the tliigh. One 
of the murderers dismounted from his horse, and while they 
struggled together, another whig came up and knocked the 
soldier down. They then carried away the soldiers' arms and, 
clothes, and went off thinking they harl killed them both. 
effect the wounded man died a few days aftorwards. 
principal executor of this atrocious deed was one Scarlett, 
tinker, who is proved to have heen a follower of Mas Jol 
Welsh,^ and Richard Cameron, being one of their body-gui 
which was ever well armed in case of an assault froin the 
King's troops. Scarlett had seven wives, which was exorbi- 
tant. He certainly led on bis friends to this action for the 
sake of avenging the blood of the saints; not for the paltry spoil 
of a few clothes, and some arms, as the justifiers of his set 
would insinuate, in hopes to shelter this assassination uudei 
the vizard of a common ixibbery, and a ctisual murder, 



the 
and^^ 

Th^H 
tt, a^H 

larcC^H 



Tlie Duke of Monmouth lingered some timo after hia super^a 
sednre,* with the army, and then went by Stirling into Fifc^l 
where ho paid a visit to the Duke of Rotliea. He afterwards ( 
repaired to Court, and met vrith a very cordial reception from ^ 
the King, though his Majesty was much of Captain Graham's 
mind respecting the treatment proper for such delinquents as 
his Grace had lately been dealing with, and knew too much of j 

> [Even in 1 GGG, thero wbb an orilor from Uia Chancellor Rnthcs la I^rd Dnun- 
laiirig (aFtprnBrds Eurl iiu<i Duke of QoBcnabeiT;}, In da all iu liU power, aa SberiF 
of Dumfriesshire, to apprehend and bring to jtui^ca Mas Jolin WeWi, who hmd 
beeD oxctting Ihc people to rebellion at conventicles, and had been outlawed fbp r*.- 
fiuing to appear when summoned by Iho Privy Coandli—Qiittiiiierry Paper*.'] 

■ [Sir Wallsr Scott has the foltowing note to Crei^jhton's Memoirs :— ■■ The OMu- 
misaiou to General Dalyell wna dclirered to him, June S3, 1G79 ; hut it did not 
Bupetsedc tJie Duke of Monmoulli, who i« alj led Lord General bj llie Privy Couodl, 
June 24, and wrote in that characlar to Iheir Lordships the aamo day. Hia eom- 
misaioD, however, was rovoked the first of November follawing." Prom a letter 
nnn^ the Qiieenabcrry Papeiv, it is apparent that Dalycll's cnaimlxaion was sub- 



ordiii: 



a Man 



Diilh'^. 



ITSCOCNT OF DUNDEE. 



293 



I 



huDiau nature to imputQ his forbearance entirely to the dic- 
tates of humanity. This was the laat insurrection of the kind 
iu Scotlauil, and bitterly did the whigs deplore their calamity 
in the miscarriage. The more violent party, the Cameronians, 
charged the cooler Preabyterians with the misfortune ; and 
they were not slow to reciprocate the accusation. But both 
sects agreed in reprobating the conduct of their own leaders, 
and admiring the clemency of Monmouth, concerning whom 
they ever afterwards spoke and wrote with wonderful regard 
and tenderness. 

Captain Graham, together with the other offlcere who had 
experienced the disaffection of Glasgow, and thought that the 
western shires required some severe correction, pro]>osod that 
the soldiers should be allowed two or three hours to plunder 
the houses of the whigs in that town, and that these shires 
should be put under a regimen of fire and sword.' But mil- 

■ [Hr Sharpe here followi the nMTntive of Wodraw, who giroB it thus : " Tba 
officers of the trmy who IumI been at Gliugow, Mijor While, CUTerbonae, uid 
otlien of their emrl ttrnptr, >alicit«l iho Goaerml In ruin Iht trot of Hf-otiahd Biid 
burn (Hatgo*, Hamilton, t,aA Slnlkaee*, to kill lit ^Tuoiun, *t leut cotuiderkble 
nnmbcrm of ibein, uid to permit the anuy to (JaDiler the wcslem »hlro>, who, thej 
(Jleged, hw) countenuieed the rebrts. The Geaemi kbhorred to urutanl ■ pro- 
poBKl, uid rejected it with ditalation." — Uitl. tol. S. p. I IS. Thi« i* pun Wad- 
nmana. It is iinponible lo pemw CUTerhonAe'a own iettcn, and not be aalia^ 
ficd tint the &bove acciuatioD ■■ an eiliKragBitt f&bcbood. In all probability had 
Mr Shurpc come In publish hii Memoirs of Dundee, he would hsTe discovend lliis. 
Even Biahnp Burnet only states it tliua : - The Dulie of MunuiouUi stopped lh« 
execution ihst his men were making, u itoon •■ be could, and UTed the prisoners ; 
for MRU moved, that they should be all killed oo tlie spot." — Ov* Tiew, rol. li, 
p. IK, (111133). Law, in hia Hem-irials, tells no such story. Malootm Laing, ft 
fai«torian by no means scrupalnus in seizing upon calunrnioui nmours agnin'>t Iba 
royalists merely tBys, — • Mounoutli, rejecting llie advice of kit aficrrt to raragi 
llu Msstry. diimissed the militia," Ac. Sir Walter ScutI dns* not adopt the story, 
■llh'iugli huncnlably wrunR (ntn I), both an regards tlio hIsloHeal facts, and tba 
dispoelliiHi uT (inlum of Uavorhouoe. Who but inu*t ileaply rvgrvl this I " Who 
would not weep if .^IliiMi* wen lie I" Leaning too murti u|>ia Wodruw, on Ilia un:i 
hand, bowing li>o courteoufily to tlie Maiurt uf SctiUand on Uio oIIht, Sir Walirr 
tlius htstnrillB* tbe ealumny : ■' Considersl'le slaui-hler, it u tulH, look pbloe, nol- 
witlintanding liia ( Monmoutli's) orders, pnrtif awinfi to llie ssnifaBtUjr Itm/^r uT 
(lavsrhouse, wliu was bsming to ii/iMJs ftHftauM far tXt dtftat e/ JVawc/o.), and 
the dmtk of hit hinmrm, wlio was slain there."— ^/W. of St^nmd, vol. II. p. II. 
We aak the proof for all tlils I aanrhDUBe*B own iMteni <hi jirov*,— 1st, that hie 
waa not an unrelenting, but • huotane tamper ; 3.t, Ihal ha eulerlsined no fi«liag of 
rrmfratM whatevtr fur lila .lefeal st Drumriog, bal rxereispd, and brulralad, llin 



294 MEMORIALS OF THE 

der measures were the order of the day. Glasgow got off by 
giving up a debt owing to it by the town of Edinburgh ; and 
the rebels of the west had reason to thank the Duke of Mon- 
mouth, and his faction, for suffering very little after the over- 
throw of their friends at Bothwell. Forces, however, were 
sent into these parts, and Claverhouse made a progress through 
the shires of Ayr, Galloway, Nithsdale, and Dumfries, search- 
ing for those who had been at Bothwell, who were severely 
fined, and had their houses plundered by the soldiers. Wod- 
Tow particularises one M^Leweyand, in the parish of Bar, whose 
mansion Captain Graham rifled, carrying away all the clothes 
in it, and two horses worth six pounds ! Another fellow was 
forced to pay thirty pounds Scots ! But in Galloway, cries 
he, things were yet worse. There Graham earned with him 
same English dragoons, several troops of horse, and companies 
of foot. The soldiers, he says, plundered unmercifully. Their 
leader carried away abundance of horses from the parish of 
Carsphairn. From one man in Craigengillan were taken 
three, worth eleven nobles a piece. A widow was compelled 
to pay fifty pounds because her servant had been at Bothwell ; 
and a wife (horresco referens) was obliged to accept of a hus- 
band for the nonce (in presence of her husband proper), in the 
person of one of the rude soldiers, who afterwards plundered 
the house of every thing portable.^ 

Let us believe these stories cautiously. This Lucretia has 
no name, — like the old man who occasioned the insurrection 
of Pentland. Two boys, who are alleged to have been bar- 
barously used by Captain Graham's nien, in the parish of Glen- 
cairn, are in the same predicament. One, on refusing to name 
those of his neighbours who were at Bothwell, had a small cord 

utmost forbearance, eren when sent to deal strictly with the same excited popula- 
tion, after the tide of rebellion had risen still higher ; 3d, that he had no kingman 
tlain at Drwnclog,} 

I [Wodrow, certainly, is not to be trusted in the details of any story that he 
tells. <* Papers before me," is his usual mode of proving. But there could not fail 
to be much individual suffering, and many instances of military oppression, through- 
out the progress of quelling the i-ebellion instigated by the preachers. Did these 
people imagine, contrary to all human experience, that their rampant rebellion, 
murdering right and left, bishopn, curates, and soldiers, and struggling with all their 
power to overturn the throne, was to intniduce no suffering, even of the innncmt 
mong themRelves ?J 



VLSCODNT OF DUNDEE. 295 

twisted round the upper part of his head, and tightened by 
means of the butt-ond of a pistol, till the cord reached the 
skull, and his cries were heard at a great distance. The other, 
A shepherd, declining to discover the retreat of his master, 
who was a rebel, was suspended from the joist of the cottage 
hy two small cords attached to his thumbs ; but his pniu did 
not conquer hia obstinacy, as Wodrow declares that the sol- 
diers " got nothing out of him." The first youth, he says, 
" died within a little after he came out of their hands."' 

The Duke of Monmonth'a representations were supposed to 
have procured the indulgence mentioned above to the whigs ; 
and the cabals against the Duke of Lauderdale daily gaining 
strength, several notorious rebels, such as Patrick Hume of 
Polwarth, afterwards Earl of Marchmont, and the Lord Card- 
ro88, were set at liberty ; which so much alarmed the loyal 
party in Scotland, tliat, on the 25th July 1679, they sent 
Captain Graham, and Lord Linlithgow, to London, to repre- 
sent the true state of affairs to hia Majesty. Great changes 
both in Church and State were expected, but very few or none 
really took place. On the 2'tth of November, the Duko 
of York arrived in Edinburgh, as Commissioner from hia 
brother to the Parliament ; and in the same luuiith Gene- 
ral Dalycll is declared Gommandcr-in-chief of his Majesty's 
forces there, with a power of acting without orders from any 
person, in the King's absence, except in emergencies of State, 
Tchen the Council wore allowed to give him directions. Old 
Dalyell, indeed, would not accept of the command on any 
other terms. 

■(Soe Wmlrow.vul, iii. p. 122. Haw dam tbenurtj'n'bgiot Touch IheKiloriral 
He proTa Ihcm Ihua ; " Tko puwtgiM of their barbsril)-, / kan wtll ti/»ei*d," — ud 
idiiog he TDuobulak H« doe* not veature tu uwirt that Ctavei^ 
boune wu preMDt at Itaeaa atrocioiM prnMsdiDgn ; but, !n liiit usual jontiticwJ maa- 
ncr. In cadcaToun lu ereale the impniiBion tlitl he wm, *■ In the pariah of Olon- 
«airti, (he toUirrt amier Ctnrtr^oui Daitc Icrritile havoc," ftc. If bo maanl la 
I igainit Graham, ths alary ia do leu* falH thaa bis venloD of iha doalh of 
John Browu, aa the tenor of all tho Ictlcn of this calumoiaUnl aoldier anJ alatounaii 
e bej'ODd a quaation. It ha maani to aay t)iat Uinw liapruvisml tortarra, wnra 
iiifllelad in tliu alitcnet of their eonunandar, by tlie aoliUcni, Uid alury atill bears tho 
■Ump of falaahooil on Ibe facr of il. Qavarhuuae waa nul tho man to hate hia dra- 
>r hi* auhurdinale sAnera, au ill lu baud, Uiat thej' wouli) dare to play aocb 
praoha In bia afaaanoe. They had mi anlburily from Ih* I'livi Cminail Ui in- 
flict lortura. See befon, p. 123.] 



296 MEMORIALS OF THS 



[We may here supplement Mr Sharpe's narrative with an 
original letter found among the Queensberry Papers, and 
written by the Chancellor Rothes to his potent friend the 
*• Deil o' Drumlanrig/ wherein mention is made of the doom 
of those two unfortunate " cocks of the conscience,* Kid and 
Kin:;. We cannot trace in that letter, nor in any state corres- 
pondence we have «liscovered, the signs of those merciless dis- 
positions with which Wodrow iRc/ik^i'miiia/e/y invests all the 
leading statesmen of the day, and upon whom he rarely be- 
stows any other title than ** the Managers." After a long 
series of riots, assassinations, midnight murders, and treason- 
able proclamations, culminating at Dnimclog into open and 
triumphant rebellion, the yet more audacious attempt to seize 
the Government of Scotland, and dethrone the King, had just 
been crushed at Bothwell Bridge. That such a state of 
matters would of necessity be followed by a plentiful harvest 
for the hangman, might have been predicated from the whole 
history of mankind in a gregarious state. But never, surely, 
did Ketch reap a poorer profit, in any age or country, under 
similar circimistances. Burnet shortly states it thus : " Two 
of their preachers were hanged ; but the other prisoners were 
let go upon their signing a bond for keeping the peace ; two 
hundred of them were sent to Virginia, but they were all cast 
away at sea." Excited Ireland, not half so sinning, has, with- 
in these few years, been far more severely dealt with. The 
battle of Bothwell Bridge occurred on Sunday 22d of June 
1679. An indemnity to all whom it was possible to pardon, 
and be a Government, was " given at our Court at Windsor 
Castle, the 27th day of July 1679, and of our reign the thirty- 
first year : by his Majesty's command, (signed) Lauderdale.'* 
The very day previous to tliis, however, happened to be the 
date of a letter from the King to his Council in Scotland, a 
most necessary exercise of justice tempered with mercy, in 
which is set forth, his Majesty's " detestation of the murder 
of the late Archbishop of St. Andrews ; and being desirous to 
vindicate that innocent blood, and show his detestation of the 
murder, lie commands them to cause process criminally nine of 
those wlio wore in the late rebellion, with this additional con- 
Hideration, of having owned these murderers ; who are heriby 



riSCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 297 

excepted from any indemnity ; and that besides the persons 
who are to be excepted therein; those nine being to bo exe- 
cuted merely upon i/tat account : Thej, being con^'icted, are 
to be hanged in chains upon the place where the horrid mur- 
der was committed." The close proximity of the dates of 
those state papers raised, it seems, a doubt, and a debate in the 
Privy Council of Scotland, which certainly cannot be attri- 
buted to a thirst for blood. 



" For the Earl of Queembern/, Thene : — 

"HlkAugiut, 1679. 

" Mt Dear Lord : — According to yoar coramand, I made your ex- 
cuse in Council ; wliicb, in my opinion was very well taken. At our 
meeting yesterday, whera we tat late, there was many debates fell in, 
ftnd long and learned speeches mode ; especially by the Lords tliRt 
oame down. But the Adrocale, and Craigie, is not yet come ; which 
is ill taken. When the indemnih/ came in among u»>, all men spoke ; 
being generally (as yoii know Ter; well) able men, mid escellent 
orators. But there was a letter produced, trom his Mnjesty to tbu 
Council, showing it was his pleasure nine should bu hangiid notwitb- 
Btaoding of the Indemnity ; whiuh loiter was dated the very day hrfurc 
tliu Indemnity. Upon wblcb, tbero arose mauy debates ; nn<l, afW 
a long time spent, we resolved that, ibia day, bis Majesty's Indemtiity 
should be solemnly proclaimed ; and it is wy opinion those nine the 
King's letter relates to may yet bo freed ; and so none die but the (iro 
miniaUrt,^ (that are to be esecated this day), in regard the date of the 
King's letter is of a prior date, although only by one dny. 

" This day in Conncil it is resolved, that a Jutdce Air should be sent 
through the Southern sbires, and Fife. It will be in October; and 
one of their diets is to be kept at Dumfries ; whicfa I suppose will put 
you to some charge and trouble ; as that at Cupar will do to dig. The 
general proclamations are not yet printed, but one of them will this 
night, and the othur to-morrow. If they bad, I would have sent them 
to you ; but I doubt not Hugh Wallace will send them. I am joat 

I now going over the water to the Earl of Wemyss's funeral, which !« to 
be to-morrow ; and am to go for Tyninghamc to see my I>ird lloilding- 



I 



MKidund King. 



208 MEMORIALS OF THE 

lMi'« loii.' I have a tbonsand psMagcs to write, whidi I intend to do 
■t moiv leuurv, but tliuy bave kept me m long ia tLe Coancul that 1 
bave almost lost ihe tide; so will u; no wore but, tn; de«r l<onl 
•dieu. 

"&.■■'] 

The Council, January 6th, 16S0, grant full power and com- 
mission to tho Earl of QueeoBbeny, Sir Robert Dalzell of ' 
Olonao, and CIttverliouse, or any two of tliem, and such as 
Ibojr shoulti appoint for tbe shires of Dumfries and Wigton, 
ftnd Bt«wartry of Kirkcudbright, to procure exact lists of all 
tho lieritors within those twunds who were in the rebellion, 
and of witiiussDS wliu can prove the same against them ; with 

' ITIm ChUKellor'i awn un-in-Uw, of whom aAerords.] 

■ [tMyiaal, liftevntborry Papen. Wodrov, in hia dbiuI jssaitiea] manner, haa 
till* rlclioiiliHW tkwit upon tiM proceedinga which the abore letter illuatratea : " Tb« 
linHiUnulluii ut Uw Slilh June," — agaiDBt the rebels at Bolhwell Brulge,—'' alood 
III Tull tiirw, till il <ru, i/ 1 nrijr ff to, a liltle sofiened bv Ihe IiuUmnUg llie King 
waa plcwwcl to grant aoiuc time after this. It bears date at Windsor, July &7tli. 
What w«> iha rraaoD of tho dcU^ing tbe publinhingaf it, ut Angust 14th, t ahaU 
not ilobmnlna. That, aa wo ahall hear, waa tlie day of the public eaecutiM) of 
Monni Kiof and Kid. ll may be reckoned inridioui to nippoae that methods 
warn laksii to delay il at London for some weeks, and ita publicslioii, «b«n 
agnied tu (lierv, wm drfrrred eo long, Ikai lit leldUri tnijiAl iart lit lautftr lima 
Iv iiinu* and t/MiU li* e<iiintrf."~Hii*. toI. iii. Tbe cause of tlie delay waa 
aliii|ily llila. A few atam euiiijilaa, at least, were abaolutely necessary ; and be- 
aldea anob ' oiDlileilt riiigleadem" as Kid and King, nine of auob oF the rebda 
who, hfUtt having beeii at Uothwell Bridge, cboea to ideotify themseltea with tbe 
uiirdarere uf Arelibialiup liharp by obatiiiately refuajni; to dJauwD Uiat crime, or 
adniil Itial it waa a orime, weni urderci) to be tried ou those chargoa ; and, al^r 
ounviotion, to be oxeeiilod, and hntigcd in chaina on Majrua Mtwr. At liead-quar- 
lara, tlio Qniuoll Id Suolland ware mtialdered loo dilatory in tills retributive justice, 
nliloh tho boat palloy required sUould follow us speedily as possible (he crushing of 
tlio rabellion. The order against the nine waa dated GCth July. The general In- 
dHliliilly waa dalud llip day after. l)u[ manifestly this loal could not be promul- 
galad till tha former was, and at least in the conise of fulfilmeiiC. Nun, so far from 
tliu Iiideinulty being dulayed in London for the ridiculous reason so malicioualy aii- 
alguedby Woilrow, Luudei'dale.iaaletter to the Couucil of that same date, 36th July, 
idgiilflea,—" Tliat the King wondera he hath no account of tbe trial of the priaonen 
who were tmlntHlly rinyliadtrt, and active in the rebellion ; and 'ti 
pleasure thut the Justice Court proceed immodialcly lo the trial of them." The 
(.\iHnoll anawer,—" Thai tho Justiciary halh already senlonoed Messrs King and 
Kid, and thry liuve appolntod a committee lo conuder Ilie moat proper m ~ 

prDoeedlng against otiicrs wlio have Uien rivi/lniden in the rebellion. Bnt thia 
oumnilllH did not report lo tlie Council until the Gth of August. Rothes's letter 
ctplsins «hslfiillnweit.] 



I 




VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 299 

proofs tliat they arc heritors; and to send in lists to the 
couucil, or Lord Advocate ; with power to call btfore them 
the Sheriffs, Stewarts, Bailies of Regalities, or their Deputies, 
Magistrates of Burghs, Ministers of Parishes, or any persons, 
whoever they shall be informed can best make discovery of 
the said rebels, or witnesses; with power to examine them 
upon oath, or not, as they shall see cause ; also with power to 
them, if the witnesses refuse to compear, or, compearing, to 
declare, to imprison their persons, and put Ihctn under caution 
U) compear before the Council, under reasonable penalties ; and 
all Magistrates, &. are ordained to concur. 

These powers were also given to other noblemen and gentle- 
men in the disafl'ected shires, where conventicles were once 
more becoming numerous and freiiuent. The affair at Both- 
well had at first depressed the spirit of the fanatics ; but his 
Majesty's indulgence again raised it, and it was deemed neces- 
sary to recall that measure of leniency. The meeting-houses 
which had arisen with amazing quickness, were ordered to In: 
demolished, and garrisons were placed in Galloway. Ayrshire, 
and Lanarkshire, to repress the disorders of the rabble. 

About this time, Richard Cameron, who hath left his name 
to a sect of Presbyterians, and Donald Cargill, two fanatic 
preachers, began to out-soar all ihe others in eulhusiosm, trame 
of whom they reprobat<.-il for their a<u^eptauce of the late in- 
dulgence, and others for being too lukewarm in the good old 
cause. A very treasonable and silly tract, intended for a sort 
of public declaration of their principles, was discovered in the 
pocket of one Hnll of Haughead, who got his skull fractured 
at the Queensferry, and died soon after. Cargill (who nar- 
rowly escaped when Kail was taken), together with Cameron, 
1 thought proper publicly to affix, to the market cross of Sau- 
Lquhar, a declaration renouncing the King's authority, indued 
V every other but their own, and replete with the most alwmi- 
L cable falsehoods. Sir James Turner, mentioned before, wrote 
Bomc ludicrous papers on tliose declarations, and Cameron at- 
tempted to defend that published at Sampihar. While the 
Prev^bytorians agreed in general as l^i the fundamental points 
of their manifestoes, thny were worrying ea<h other respecting 

I»xprc9sionn and asHertionB of comparatively very fritling im- 
IWrtance, 



a) 



300 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Cameron was not long permitted to continue in his impudent 
rebellion. In July 1680, he was killed in a skirmish with the 
rebels at Airs-moss, in the parish of Auchinleck, in Kyle. 
The rebel force consisted of about twenty-three horse, and 
forty foot, which had in a manner been collected by Cameron 
after Bothwell, and attended him wherever he went. The 
royal party, of thirty horse, and fifty dragoons, were com- 
manded by Bruce of Earlshall, (Lieutenant to Claverhouse), 
who got notice of the position of the rebels from Sir John 
Cochran of Ochiltree. At this affair was taken David Hackston 
of Rathillet (who commanded the rebel horse), the Primate's 
murderer, whose wounds at Airs-moss had nearly rescued him 
from the public execution he so richly merited. He was brought 
into Edinburgh, and conveyed along the streets to the Tolbooth 
mounted on a bare-backed horse, with his face to the animal's 
tail, and his feet tied under its belly, the ghastly head of 
Cameron fixed upon a pike, and that of one James Fowler, 
(who had commanded the rebel foot) in a sack, being carried 
before him. It was thought fit that the sentence of the ex- 
isting law (upon the murderer of a privy councillor, and a 
traitor rebel taken in arms,) should in this case be rigorously 
executed. He w^as the only one of the principals in the Bi- 
shop s murder put to death for that crime. ^ The others fled to 
the Prince of Orange ; and several of them again returned to 
their native country along w4th him, to sanctify the pious Re- 
volution. But Cargill still continued to haunt the muirs and 
mountains, poisoning all the healthful virtues of these remote 
places with his noxious preachments. He was now looked up 
to as the father of the Presbyterian Kirk, and in that capacity 
exercised the Pope's darling perogative of anathemas and 
curses. With great boldness he resolved to excommunicate 
the King,* and all whom they deemed oppressors of tlie godly ^ 
not even sparing the Duke of Monmouth ; and accordingly, in 
the Torwood in Stirlingshire, amid a crowd of his followers, 

^ [This murderous fanatic could hardly complain of being treated in the like man- 
ner his own sect had treated the wounded and captive Montrose, a humane and 
illustrious noble, who never shed a drop of blood except in battle.] 

' [Considering how long the Covenanters had worked with their tremendous 
lever, the exwmmuniocUwn of malignanUyXhsy had little reason to complain of the 
established government's inUreammuning ofmurderen and rtbeU.} 



^^^^^^H VISCOUNT OF DDNDEE. 301 

^^Pin the month of September 1680, he gravoly sot liimself about 
^H this important work ; first by lecturing on these verses from 
^B Ezekiei, chapter xxi. — " And thou, profane wicked Prince of 
Israel, whoae day is cojoe, wlien iniquity shall have an end, — 
thus Bayeth the Lord God ; Remove tfie diadem, and take off the 
croum ; this shall not be the same : exalt liim that is low, and 
abase him that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it ; 
and it shall be no moro until he come whose rif^bt it ie ; and 
I will give it him." Ho then preached on the IStli of the 5th 
of 1st Corinthians : " But them that are without, Gwl juJgeth, 
Therefore put atcayfrom among yoursdven that wicked person ;" 
and so Mas Donald Cargill proceeded in all due form, to eaxom- 
municate the Sovereign. This Saint, as might be expected, 
shortly after also followed the tract of some of his own dis- 
ciples. Six thousand merks had been set upon his head, and 
the Laird of Bonaliaw contrived, after a long pursuit, to lay 
hold on him. He was first conveyed to Glasgow, near to 
which his conductors turned him upon his horse, and led bim 
backwards into the town. Ho was from thence conveyed to 
Edinburgh, where be behaved before the Council iu the as- 
sured manner of his sect (when their cose was hopeless) and is 
said to have predicted the death of Duke Botbes, the Chan- 
cellor, who (according to Cargill's biographer Patrick Walker), 
raged against him, threatening him with torture, and a violent 
death. Donald saiil, — " My Lord Rothes, forbear to threaten 
me ; for die what death I will, yowr eye» mil not sw. it f — and, 
on the morning of the day destined for Cargill's execution, the 
Duke expired. 
While a preacher at Glasgow, Cargill hod been little es- 

I teemed, but his wanderings, and high flights, got bim reputa- 
tion nnd many followers. During his ministry, a oect madder 
■till, arose in Scotland, which, as a climax and caricature of 
Presbyterianism, enraged the very souls of Donald and bis 
tUsciplos. The new enthugioHts were at first called Sioevt 
Bingera, from singing psalms 74, 70, 80, 83. and 137, at their 
meetings. Their ruling elder was John Gibb, originally a 
tailor in Borrowstounneas, and a rigid presbyterian. By de- 
grees, hia lieiid appears tu have turned ; nnd, Ijoing a pro- 
digious stout fellow, he quickly c(>iivcrt<-d hvonty-Mx women ; 



^ 



302 IfEHORIALS OP THE 

onlj three meu ut first following Im Land ; which is like I 
proportion of Falstaff's bread to his sack. They repaired I 
mooTs and waste pkces. denouncing and corsing all who did n 
come np to their extravagancies. Tbcy haunted the Pentland 
Hills, lingering to behold the doom of lire they prophesied was 
to consume the city of Edinburgh. Cargill attempted to preach 
them into the right path again ; but his oratory was not ve^^ 
convincing ; and nothing but a confinement in the tolbootl 
of Edinbui^h. which afterwards took place, brought them toM 
their seo$e«. But even there, they commited a thousani 
follies, publishing a strange blag^'hemous declaration; aiid4 
casting dirt from their prison windows on the coach of ih% . 
Duke of York, who laboured, however, very successfully, to 
bring thorn to « due sense of their distraction. 

It is much the fashion with historians of a certain perfiuasioo, , 
to assert, that it was oikly al>out this time (1680),a fewhotr-headed^ 
whigs began to throw off all allegiance to the King, and adopi] 
the principles of assassination and universal vengeance. From ' 
a perusal of their writings, however, and the very fundamental 
principles of the sect, it will be seen that there are no jtist 
grounds for this hypothesis. If it were only now that their 
preachers really began to consider the King as a UBurping 
tyrant, and his laws as a code of illegal oppression, they bad 
long before deluded their followers by pretending a false be- 
lief ; and if the sweets of revenge but newly began to be | 
relished, how came the blood of the Archbisliop to be scented ■ 
by them witli such peculiar rapture, anil his murderers styled 
pious youths, and universally cherished and magnified by the 
Covenanters ? The truth is, tliat the principles of these meu 
were ever much the same, though their own prudence some- 
times smothered, as provocation at present exasperated them ; 
and it requires very little historical knowledge to be aware of 
this.' 

It is certain, however, that about this time the preachers 
began to jn-ophevy, pretending to foretell not only their own 
fate, which required no great foresight to divine, but also that ' 
of their " persecutors," and this " perjured, covenant-breaking 

> [The protoealion Mr Slurpe illuiles to, is whsl those oiiled, and oiitiftwcd win- 
ventiols orstora, tenneJ ptrucitioii, and ooDsiMcd in the mitslrfWUiDg of ilie ni-m 
or the Uw lo »n««t treamd, ivbetlion, and murdrr.] 



VISCOUNT OF DONDEE. 303 

' kmgdom." Mr PedenB printed etForta iu tliat way gaiiiod 
much celebrity ; and to tJiis hour they astonisli and terrify 
great numbers of the lower class of old women in Scotland. 
In England, not only the puritan preachers, but their wives, 
pretended to revelations. In January 1681, it was thought 
fit to bring two women to public punishment; as the fanatics 
of that sex, added to their natural acti^-ity and zeal, had on 
some occasions openly resisted the King's troops when seizing 
prinoners, and comported themselves like amazonian viragoes. 
Isabel Alison, and Marion Harvie, wore the women fixed upon ; 
botli amply gifted with godliness, and the grace of unshaken 
obstinacy. Marion was cauglit while going from Edinburgh 
to a field sermon, by a party despatched to seize Cargill, and 
brought before the Council. Being questioned concerning the 
Queensferry paper, and the Sanquhar declaration, she declared 
she knew nothing about them ; but when they were read to 
her, she said she owned them, because they were agreeable to 
the Scriptures. Some of the Council told her, a rock, and cod 
and bobbins, would suit her better than these debates ; which 
was a truth she could not so readily acknowledge. Indeed, it 
is quite wonderful to observe the pride and presumption of 
these illiterate creatures. In her dying testimony, as she calls 
it, she says, — " I leave my blood upon the traitor that sits 
upon the throne : Then on James, Duke of York, who waa 
sitting in the Council when I was examined the first day : 
And I leave my blood on the bloody crew, that call themselves 
nilera: And I leave it on James Henderson in the North- 
ferry, who was the Judas that sold Archibald Stewart and 
Mr Skeen, and me, to the bloody soldiers for so much money : 
I leave my blood on Sergeant Warrock, who took me, and 

[ brought me to prison : I leave my blood on tho criminal 
Lordg as they call themsidves ; and especially on that excom- 
municated tyrant, George Mackenzie, tho Advocate, and the 
fifteen assizors : And on Andrew Cunningham that gave mo 
my doom : And on that excommunicated traitor Thomas Dal- 
ycll, who was porter that day that 1 was first before them, and 
tlireat«ned me with the boots," TJiia amiable person had de- 



I' [■ Tha during TMlimoD; knit kil words of M«T 
Oond >if WitnOMM for Uic Itnyal Pren>;;uilvEa of Joa 



ThtwIiQlcDflhl. 



304 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



dared, before the Lords of Justiciary, that it -was h/tvj 
the Archbishop, yet pntertained a dislike of murder, aa she 
deemed her own execiilitm. On mounting tlie ladder to be 
hanged, she said, — " my fair one, ray lovely one, come away 
and sitting down on the ladder she aaid, " I am not come bi 
for murder, for thoy have no matter of fact to charge 
but oidy my judgment. I am about twenty years of age 
fourteen or fiftoeu I was a hearer of the curate, and indi 
[ministers], and while I was a hearer of these, I was a bl 
mer and Sabbalh-breaker ; and a chapter of the Bible was 
burden to me ; but since I heard this peraemled gospel, I di 
not blaspheme, nor break the Sabbath, and the Bible becai 
my delight." She would have said more, but the hangman 
short the thread of her discourse by hanging her.i 

For the outrages on the establislied clergy, called " Curateft, 
it is only necessary to consult Wodrow. In September 1669, 
Mr John Row, minister at Balmaclellan in Galloway, was torn 
out of his bed by a set of whigs, and beaten, liis trunks, Ac, 
broken open, and what they pleased taken away. Mr John 
liyon. Curate at Orr in Galloway, complains, that in Novem- 
her IGfiS, three persons in disguise came to his house, dragged, 
his wife out of doors, and searched for, but missed him ;; 
■\vithal thoy plundered his house. Mr John Ir%'ine, minister 
of Kilmacomh, was affrighted from his pulpit (tho same year) 




Mirinn Kkrvio'* Tialent 
Lonta I'f JunUulir;'. Mid i 

I, pTUVH, bllltl ili*t > 
■llm, wlio did Imaiei 



r before the Privy Cnuacil, nod alao before 
the anffbld, all given in naaseoua and blasphemDUS 
I WM unfit to live, imd unprepared lo die. The feiuAl* | 
) mischief, wore f»r more JeoieDtly dealt wLth by ti 
ii»nt,iuid gresloreifortB of judicial indoxecutivo humanity exerU<d, to uva . 
m fnim Ihalr aun fniitic leal, and fanatic paaaiona, than thoy bad the alighteaf J 
rl|ht lo oupwt. This Marion llarvie, in iier dying TcBtimony, nilli tlio eiecn 
ot llapliittin of Halliillel (the cowardly leader lu tho murder of the Primate), ' 
Inliiiiiuin murder of vortAy Dand llaeluloini." She bud harboured tbeoa ' 
H«>iiiidret>.] 

> [Her toatlinoDy U to ahuMve of the eurala, and the outed minislers nho had 
M<vpt«d of tliH ittdulgenet, anil at the same time so complimeatary lo tho " rouring, 
wnkoiiiiig Rift*,*' of tlio ODtlawed cooTenlicles, that very probably some of these laat 
IHHimiolvd It for her. It is impoiuible to know wbat ia true, and wliat ia false, in 
Uiat illiciwling furagD of Donsenae and Llanphemy, entitled " A Ooud •>( Wit- 
nMW*, ■' No ([ovemment, uni!tr the circumBtanooB, could buve ejiaifd tlieso 
•HtllWI.] 



vnscunNT uf dusdee. 305 

ftnd Hbused till ho luok elicltor iii bis maiisu. In May tlmt 
year, soiiio whigs, about twelve at iiiglit, attacked tlie lioueo 
of Mr Alexander Kioncar, minister at Ncil&ton, beat liiin 
and his wife unmercifully, and plumlered liia house ; and 
in iho parish of Qlasgow in Lanarksbirc, the houBC of Mr 
James Finlay was plundered, himself hcitig searched for. 
There was a riot also committed on the miuister of Dunacorc. 
Mr Lawson was wounded. The year 1684 commenced with a 
iiotahk< whig exploit ; a band of wretches murdered Mr Peter 
PeirsoD, clergyman or curate of Carsphaim, who had become 
very obunxious to the whigs, not only on account of his in- 
fonnations against them, lint bei^uso he had braved the ter- 
rors of Renwiclt's Declaration, which had compelled sundry of 
hie brethren to a temporary retirement from their livings, 
wearied out as they were by the previous nidcneus and bru- 
tality of their seditiously excited parisliioners, and now dread- 
ing the extremities of their revengeful hatred. But Mr Peir- 
«on, a hold man, used greatly to provoke these fanatics, by 
publicly declaring that " ho feared none of the whigs. nor any 
thing else but rats and mice."' In 1GS8, Mr Buchon, tlte 
minister of Spott, was taken out of his bed, by fanatics armed 
with swords and guns, and led down to the church half naked ; 
in his presence they took away the church bible and keys, and 
discharged him on his peril to officiate any longer in that 
parish as minister.* There are many more recorded instances 
of tbo kind, but those must suffice for examples. It is very 
remarkable, that (in the face of all this), Wodruw should fur- 
nish 80 many stories of " wanderers" seized by the soldiers 
without a Hhadeno of excuae for their so doing ! This compels 
one to doubt of every thing he records ; the more especially 
that he professes to follow the accounts of the " sulfcrers" 
them»elvcB. How can a writer, expecting to bo in any sort 
credited, tell as of miraLtilous punishment so ofton overtaking 
the " iwrsecutors," or those who gave up the culprits to their 
pursuers ? Of women going distracted, and men dying witli 
tongues swollen, or under other horrible symptunis of thi- ven- 
geance of Heaven ? 



V 



{S» before, far ilie dotklb of thia nnr^er, p. nD.] 
ItHonU of the Kirk SoBlon of the ptrbb ot 9ifa\\.~ 



306 SJEMORIALS OF THE 

[Sir George Mackenzie, the Lord Ailvocato, in his admiraUe 
aijd most tomi>erate " Viudieation," the truth and tnistworthi- 
iiess of which is infinitely and beyond all comparison above 
that of Wodrow'e history, most justly exclaims : " The reader 
vn\l be astonished when we iuform him, that the way of wor- 
ship in our Church differed nothing from what the Presby- 
terians themselves practised, — except only that we use tho 
Doxology, tho Lord's Prayer, and, in baptism, tho Creed ; all 
which they rejected. We had no ceremonies, surplice, altara, 
cross in baptisms, nor tho meanest of those things which would 
be allowed in England by tJie Dissenters, in way of accommoda- 
tion ; that the most able and pious of their ministers did hear 
the episcopal clergy preach ; many of Ihem communicated in 
the churches ; and almost all the people communicated also : 
80 that it cannot be said that they were persecuted, and forced « 
to join with an unsound, much less heretical Church, as t 
French Protestants are : From all which it follows cleai^ 
that the complaiuers were the aggressors ; that the Goven 
ment proceeded by ehw atepe to punish even those who 1 
forced if into a resentment; and that all pains were taken t 
reclaim rather that punish." The more closely we OXM 
the latent and most authentic sources of that clouded hiato 
the more truthful will this appear. The clamorous case, fd| 
the Conventicles against the Government, has been elaborate 
composed, by such partizans as Wodrow and Laiog, (o( 
casionally aided by the malicious slip-slop of Burnet), upon • 
system, — neither pleasant nor easy, lo grapple with, — of t 
most violent and nnscniptilous exaggeration, as to what 1 
Government actually did, and the most disingenuous resen 
in regard to what it had to do, and to deal with. There seem 
indeed, to have been a great disposition, amid all their privsM 
feuds, jealousies, and struggles for place and power, on 1 
part of the leading statesmen of the jieriod, who were also mu 
of great estates in the country, to proceed, as the Lord-I 
Advocate states, slowly, cautiously, and with duo discriminafi 
tion, in the practical use of those vigorous measures which tly 
avowed object of these outrageous conventicles rendered i 
necessary to enact. Ever and anon, however, some frightfnil 
result of the old covenanting spirit, alanned and excited tin 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 307 

verament, and occasionally, it may be, frightened them out 
of their propriety, not as regarded the exiating constitutional 
law, or retributive justice, but in reference to what may now, 
from our present vantage ground, be retrospectively con- 
siderod, as not the soundest or the safest policy wherewith to 
have met tlie evil At the same time it ought to be remem- 
bered, how fallacious and unjust such retrospective views, of 
the policy of past centuries, are apt to be, and that even now 
no man can say what else really ought or could at that time 
hare been done, to save the Throne from the Covenant, short 
of conceding all to rabid fanaticism. But, that a reckless 
malevolence, an insane " goading of the people," a delight in 
destroying their cottage peace, witnessing their mortal agonies, 
and shedding their innocent blood like water, animated all the 
rulers in the land, from the Kin^ to the Captain of dragoons, 
in the reign of Charles the Second, and his immediate succes- 
sor, is a frightful myth of history, systematically engendered 
by the real culprits, and, to the discredit of the historians of 
Scotland, rashly adopted by them. In the sad times we are 
attempting to illustrate, the great heritors had a most difflcnit 
part to play, as regards that root of all the evil, the field con- 
venticles. If they applied the rigour of the law within their 
bounds, a duty for which that law had justly rt-udered even 
the highest in the laud amenable, they were " persecutors." 
If they acted cantioui^ly and temperately, towards a lawless 
agitation, which never flaggod for a moment because pressure 
was withdrawn, or if they regarded these armed congregations 
with more contempt than fear, on the one linnd, they wore 
suspected of sympathieiiig, on the other, of hiring on the 
" fugitives" to their ruin. In a letter to Qneensbcrry, dated 
ISOth May, 1678, exactly a twelvemonth boforo the murder of 
Archbishop Sharp, Itothos, the Lord High Chancellor of 8i;ot- 
Und, thus writes : " Our woeful conventicles in Fife I am 
keavily loaded with. They are a pUguy beggarly people, but 
■erves their own turn to make a noise agninet m*."' In 



■ [By tbiavumcuil, tlul Rathe* was teeiueit, b; lili riial* In UiuGoi 
of prumoting tlieM ennvenUcln. His bolai nmowlikl in npponlion to LauilcnUlF, 
bat mora «a|icciall]' Ihn hut nf lil* CounlaM being an cicilvd MliTiiDllder, rendered 



808 MEMORIALS OF THE 

another lottor, dated 3rd December, 1679 (at which time the 
Duke of York had arrived in Scotland), not many months 
after the murder of the Primate, and the battle of Bothwell 
Bridge, Rothes writes, — " Yesterday we had an express from 
tile liieutenant-General, who has intelligence of an intended 
rising in the west, and the day prefixed, which is the 16th of 
the next month. Betwixt you and I, — I do not believe it ; 
though I am not such a fool as to say so to the Duke ; nor 
will I in any meeting, lest it may fall out otherwise ; for these 
fanatic fools* do not act regularly, according to the strict rules 
of reason, however good fortune they have had. But I be- 
seech you to use all the interest you have to discover what is 
in it ; and to be upon your guard, not only for your own 
security, whicli is as dear to me as my ovm, but that, if any 
such thing should be, you may appear significant, like your- 
self/' 

W« may here introduce another letter, from this precious 
ston^ of unjmblished documents, in which Queensberry is 
addressed on the same subject by the prime minister's brother, 
a few inontlis later than the last of Eothess quoted above, 
(^luirles Maitland of Hatton (or Haltoim), already mentioned, 
WiiM at tills time high in court favour, and in office. He was 
lieir-presumptive to his brother Lauderdale, General of the 
Mint, a Privy Counsellor, an Ordinary Lord of Session, and 
a most important Oflicer of State as Treasurer-Depute, or 
(Chancellor of the Exchequer for Scotland. He has been de- 
scribed, by his rival compatriots at least, as an overbearing 
official ; so much so, indeed, as to constitute one of the alleged 
" grievances of Scotland," a political card played most unsuc- 
cessfully, and deservedly so, by his bitter enemy Duke Hamil- 
ton, of whom more in the sequel. By the Wodrow school of 
historians, Lord Hatton, certainly made of sterner and less 
sterling stufl* than the lively and kindly Kothes, has of course 
been chronicled as one of those aristocratic demons, who 
danced about the fire of " Tophet" in Scotland, while the 
master fiend, he of the " seared conscience and adamantine 
heart," stirred it with his sceptre. 

' [No great compliment to his Countess.] 
' [Queensberry Papers.] 



VISCOUNT or DUSDKK, 



" For the Earl of Q,ueen»berry." 

" H.TtoDN, IBt* Apra, [IBBO.) 
" My Lord. — I am very glad by yours, 8tL instant, to learn of the 
Cbancellor's so good health. Long be it ho. By last, I told you, 
your BJgnature stopt not long.' I have declared for you, till ye come 

"This coUQtry !a not idlu, no way, neither in nstur&l nor politic 
body. Spotted fevers are universal ;' and I have lost niy youngest 
datie, and the pockshakings. This might have been prevented by 



' [RefertiDg to the rajii sigiuiiure, or warrant, leiiulred it 
roy&l gntnt which was Vo pom the seal in favoar of QMii>nRberry, tliu ofBcial for 
which aporatiun was the Treasurer-Depute. Queetwberry had been very angry 
abuut tlie dulay of tbia warraot, aa we learn ky ■ previous letter of Riithea'H, dated 
3tBl Auj^al, 1G7I>, iu which lie tclla Quoeuaberry, — *■ I rocoiTed llio houoor uf 
yaarvaT ihe 19th, where 1 find yua in a groat pawion, in relatiun tit yuur ti-/iial»re, 
I bate oflon told yau/rrUing and kajliif hnru one's self oiore tlum the pemoD whu 
olIendB them. Thii hi general I can aaaure you, my Lord TreaBurer-Dopule, ap«D 
all occulono, dues lay aa kind things of you as ever man did of another ; and 1 am 
teld by several hands tlint his brolhei' docs au loii. But, nomon as I conie to B^in- 
burgh, I Bhall obey yon in giving you a full aceouni of all relating Iu your 
ngnalurc." 

Willi all his lore and respect fur Queeneticrry, whoao riae ho greatly promaiud, 

Kothus uccuionatly usea Liui witli mueh frveUom. Iu tho cUanKler uf Hmen*- 

berry drawn by Mr Sharpo (nuo befon), p. 2il ), is noticed hia enlrumc parnmuuy. 

Wu find another noto of Mr Shan">'*> <" wliioh he aays,— '■ WilJiam, Dule of 

QumUHberry, wae a man of great parts, and no very lender eonaoixoce. He made 

himerlf maslcr of much domain in Uumfriuwhire, by waya and meouii perhaps not 

^^^ Mricily legal. A saying of bia la reeordod, ua the Jeatli of ouc oT hia men of buai' 

^^^Laata at Lochniaben, — ' Gude ml John Aliaon, and hia while pony ; if be had lived 

^^^Ptfuvo yearajuuger, 1 would liata liad a* Dumrrianhire iQ my aiu hand.' " Ho tills 

^^^P(OmI stnry aa it may, Uie fact uf hi* Utww'a auenUon lo the pence oolumu iwonia lo 

^^^ ba pluaaantly alludod lo by Ihe Cliancullor Hollies, in tlie puslacri|>l uf a letter Iu 

liiiu datad frum Lealie, 'TM August, lUKO : *< I am very much iibllgod lo uiy good 

Lord MlddlctiiD for hia fine tigi ; and as for tliat imtit/ni/Utaml Jrlmle-miriug, yiiu aay 

yuu pive his aervanl, it will be repaid you, wIidd yon give me the m ilMurt ymi 

owe, and lbs tit diilLm and o-kal/ytHi were due Will Aniul, whusu txtcKlar I sball 

lie in au far aa (Au) euuios," — ^*ttiab<rr) fayrn.} 

■ C October, 1040 i la una week'a time dind, first, tlie Lady KiltnirnlB, daoghlor 
Iu the lata laird of it, un the IStli et thai inatant ; and lier husband the loinl, 
•ceond a«n uf the Earl of Lindaay, whu got thai estaia by marrying ihla lainl'a 
daughter, dies also npun the ISth of llial instuit, hill o/ a /mrr. Tb« aabbath bc- 
fure, they wen at the cdebntiifU of the Lord'a Supper, ai the birli of Bveth. The 

E'l of lime iipuDBi-e was much Umcnted by all anrls of puuple. Tbcy h>fl soviai 
ren behUi.l lb.rm (Vllhin a few .l»j* after, Ihn L«ly Ul.okliall, her sialer, 
- 



3 1 (t MEMORIALS OF THE 

letting blood. To prevent the politic fever, in that body, I wish Bome 

•uitable coume were taken. Last week I gave his Royal Highness, 

[and] the Duke of Lauderdale, account of the growing disorders here, 

as I did to the Chancellor. If this be not timely prevented, see we 

have not, or long, another Bridge^ — I know not if BoUiweU Bridge. 

There is something proposed of small garrisons, five or six. I refer 

you to the Chancellor for this. ^ This may do something to prevent ; 

but the law roust go with the tword^ or it will not. Neither will 

govern alone. I am not for arbitrary government. I am against it. 

But I say this, as the only way to prevent the Phanaticks* arbitrary 

government, — from which, good Lord deliver you and me. I have 

given the Duke of Lauderdale account of what ye commanded me. 

Clavers' commission, as to rebels' goods, is recalled by the ConnciL 

So your man will have room for his payment : that ye need not fear. 

Yo are much concerned to have your country right. Earl Linlithgow, 

who lays there, told mo they are quiet at present ' ■ Their fault was 

never their religion before now. This I doubt not you will prevent. 

Pardon this freedom from, my Lord, your most fidthfnl and most 

humble servant, 

''Charles Maitland." 

The Reverend Robert Law, who seems to have come to his 
souses on the subject of conventicle principles and practice, 
(though not of superstition)^ about the time of Bothwell 
Bridge, which rising he did not join, fully justifies Lord 
Ilatton's hint, jn the above letter, that the state of the body 
politic required some judicious blood-letting, — the proper 
physician going tlierein hand in hand with the man of the 
lancet. About eight months after the date of the above 
lett^^r, Law records : " December 1st, 1680 : One Skene, bro- 
ther to the laird of Skene, and related to the Earl of Mar and 
other noblemen, and one Stewart, a skipper's son, of Borrow- 
stonness, and one Potter, all three being formerly apprehended, 
did, before the King's Council at Edinburgh, adhere to the 

being infected with the same disease, (for it was a pestilentious fever), and coming 
to Kilbumie to wait on the funerals, she also dies there." — X.atp'« Memorials^ 
p. 165. These tragedies occurred about six months after the date of Hatton's 
letter to Qucensberry.] 

* [Tiiis was a measure earnestly pressed on the GoTemment by ClaTerhouse, as 
wo shall afterwards find from his own letters.] 

■ [Queensberry at this time appears to have been from home.] 



\ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 311 

lato covenant, and Sanqiibar (toclonttion ; and being questioned 
, whether they would kiU the King and his amnseUora, if it were 
' in their power? anawored, affirmatively, tJtey vxmld. They 
Buffered death the said day at Edinburgh ; the two last hav- 
ing their heads cut off after they were hanged ; the friends of 
the first having pled that his head miglil not be cut off, and 
fixed with the rest. One poor man, present at his execution, 
declared his adherence to their opinion, and was seized and 
made prisoner.' Another of tJiat gang set upon the Earl of 
Mar's servant, carrying home some things to his Lady. He 
was a Webster, and meeting with the laird of Grange, sets 
upon him also in the way, and told him he would kill him, 
becuiiee lie was an entmy to God and kis people; and struck at 
him witli his sword. The gentleman shoots a pistol at him, 
U) fright him from him ; but the more eager ho grew upon 
him. At length the gentleman rode him duwn, and appre- 
hended him. AU these deeda they jaatijy and affucl murlyr- 
dom, as did tlie DonaUsts of old," ^c. " Jiloody opinions, and 
fraclicm, have for their event bloody ends, to them that enter- 
tain and practise them ; and, indeed, tliuy art' nothing else but 
the doctrines of Antichrinl,"* Most true, Mas Robert Law. 
Let us now cull an example from Mas Robert Wodrow, a 
Presbyterian chronicler by no means impressed, like the 
former, with any idea of a natural stiquence between " bloody 
opinions and practices," and " bloody ends." Here ia his own 
version, without a word of condemnation, of the crime, and 



■ [TliMB MUmpH on the p«rt cf tho ruulica. Is bi 
of thoir brotliren, wore nol uncomrooa ; and vei^ d 

IdOWD.] 
• [tji<r'i Momarisls, p. 108, la which Hr Slutpe wlcU in a not* llto (ollowing 
fooUtion fnmi FouoUiuluill, whuta nuQuieripU were not tlicn prinWd : " Jamo*, 
bmllwr to Ilie Uird of Skene, ArcliitwIJ Slewut, ikippcc in Bamm'MonDW, 
HkmiltiHi In Braiburn, aud SptDwell, ■potliocary in GlHgaw, ue apprabeiidod. 
Bkcno giiTo in ■ pctiiion to tho Council for a reprieve, wtilcb wu gmntod, to 
1m December, bnt having rtjuHUd Ihrrto/, he, I'otter, and Slelnrt, w*re all three 
banged at KJinbargh Crom, llie IM Uoecmber, UmO, Skene being all dodied In 
WbiM llneu, to hia rarj abooa aud BI■lckilIg1^ in afituilim of innucvDCv. Mr John 
lAuder, younger of FuunUirihall, wrnl and oonvencd llieni in priiion befun) their 
laatb, but tlivf were no bigotnl, that he oniild not get them oan>riaiMd of thair 
IbUrea, bM vrn all fvt oitlitg ef llu Kiuf." — Loan Fount* iiiii*u.'e Diarf, 
MS.} 



312 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

tho demeanour, of one of his " suflcring remnant," and sancti- 
fied " wanderers," in the year of Grod 1681. 

" Patrick Foreman is indicted for disowning the King. 
The prohation, is his declaration before the Council, October 1. 
(1G81); where he confesses, that a knife was found on him 
with this inscription. For cutting tyrcmtJ throats. Being asked 
if that was to kill the King f Answers, * If the King be a 
tyrant, why not cut his throat; and if the Council were true 
judges, they would have that posie ojx their sw^ords/ Being 
asked by his Royal Highness^ if he owned the King^s autho- 
rity ? lie answered * not* Being asked if he knew that was 
treason ? He asked, * Against whom ?* And it being an- 
swered, against his Sovereign the King, — he said he disowned 
the King for his King and Sovereign. All this he adheres to 
before the Justiciar}^ and repeats his disoivning of the Ktng."^ 

And this was the fruit of those Conventicles, and the prac- 
tical application of the doctrines there preached, which have 
been so absurdly regarded as the national religion of Scotland, 
wliile Graham of Claverhouse has been denounced, and held 
up to execration in history, for daring to suppress them, in 
terms of his royal commission, with the energetic arm of the 
outraged executive. And here again the Presbyterian preacher 
Law, himself repeatedly and justly under the ban of the Gro- 
vernment, refers to the above case in a tone of sturdy and 
lioncst reprobation, which Wodrow (who, on that account, 
declines quoting this inconvenient chronicler,) would have 
done well to have followed : — 

** One of them, when rt/ped (searched), was found to have 
a knife with this inscription engraven on it, — A knife to cut 
the throats of tyrants. This man's hand, to whom this knife 
belonged, was first cut oft* before he was hanged. These 
odious opinions they possessed w-ere grounded upon two wicked 
principles, that severals in the land held, as they w^ere taught 
by con'upf ieachei's : \fit. That a king, not doing his office, or 
doing any thing contrary to religion, ipso facto is denuded of 
his royal power: 2(/, That a tyrannous kmg may, I )yjtWyaYf? 

1 [The Duke of York, who was tliin ptWiding ill the Council as High OminuB- 
Hioner.J 
« [Wodn)w'B Uistiuv, iii. ifliJ.J 



^ 



VISCOUNT OF DrSDEE. 313 

pfrmmt. he killed. Wliicli priiKiplna arc very dmigerous, For, 
by tho first, chiMron may riibol against tlieir parents, etTvants 
against their masters, tenants ayuinst their landlords, upon 
Auy stijiposed injury done them by their superiors: By tho 
Bocoiid, any private person may kill bis Priuep, upon any sup- 
posed mal-ad mini strati on, though it be not true."' Right 
again, Mas Robert Law. But who were the- " corrupt teachers" 
whom ho thus condemns ? The whole, without exception, of 
the conventicle preachers. The Messrs Shields, Cameron, 
Cargill, Kid, King, Pedeu, Rcnwiuk, and a host besides (all 
deriviug their charters from John Knox), who compose tlio 
army of Saints and Martyrs, whom Wodrow arrays in the 
robos of tlie Lamb ! 

Is it Ihen surprising, or does it atford any manifestatiou of 
a lawless and oppressive government, that, in the year 1681, 
an oath should have been framed, applicable to high and 
low, for the purpose of testing the principles of every public 
servant iu the uation? Is it sujirising, that, in framing such 
a test, at such a crisis, terms could not be found to 8uit the 
t«uipur of every shifting faction, or tlic twinge of every 
ricketty conscience ?] 



[Suction Vll.— Notes of AJfairs in Scoilarul—Trails of the 
' Times, and Skffches of Character, from Ike. paimifty of Ifie 
Test Act in 1081 to the Death of Charles the Si'ixmJ in 

loss.] 

l()8l. 

I In August of this year was passed the form of oath, to bo 
taken by all persons in public trust, called The Teel, which 
afterwards furnished the discontented parties in the kingdom 
with notable Imndlos. It was said to be an oath contradic- 
tory in itself, those clauses being fuixted into it by Sir James 
Dalryuple, President of tlic Court of Hcssion, a fox now 
trimming with the fanatics, now siding with the Court, de- 
void of all conscience, and one J^*bo, fr-ira tho very beginning, 
•ecins to have made it hi» study as much to exalt hta boily in 



"I 



314 MEMORIALS OF THE 

this world, as to debase his soul in the next* The £arl of 
Argyle, who was either of a more scrupulous conscience^ or 
of a weaker head than his father, would not take this test but 
with an explication ; which gloss was, by the quirking of 
lawyers, found to be treason. The Earl, who was possessed 
of heritable jurisdictions towards which the Crown had an eye,* 
was formally tried and condemned. But he contrived to make 
his escape from the Castle of Edinburgh in the disguise of a 
page, holding up the train of Lady Sophia Lindsay, who was 
his daughter-in-law, being married to Mr Charles Campbell, 
his second sun. She got access to the Castle by way of pay- 
ing him a visit. The Earl escaped verj^ narrowly ; for, says 
Wodrow, " one of the guard suspected him, and took him by 
the arm rudely enough ; but through the good hand of Provi- 
dence he got olT undiscovered." 

[liefore this escapade of Argyle's, followed ere long by his au- 
dacious but feeble peck at the throne in Scotland, and miserable 
attempt to assume the fanatical throne of his father (for which 
he so justly forfeited the life Providence no longer interposed 
to save), he was not held in great account by his compatriots. 
The Chancellor Rothes, in a letter to Queensberry, dated 25th 
March 1678, at which time Lauderdale and his Duchess were 
playing the magnilicent in Scotland, enters into a speculation 
as to which of the Scotch nobility was most likely to be com- 
missioned by his Grace to w^atch his interest at Court. " To 

1 [« Lord Stair (Sir James Dalrymple, the President), in the draft of the clanae, 
slyly expressed the Protestant religion to be that which was contained in an old 
Scottish Confession of Faith, which not only was adverse to prelacy, but admitted 
the lawfulness of resistance. The clause passed witliout attention, from tbe im- 
plicit confidence of all in the abilities of the person who drew it Tkui modelled, 
the Test was a bundle of ineonsisteiteUs ; for it inferred an obligation on those who 
took it to conform to any religion the King pleased, and yet to adhere to the Pres- 
byterian religion ; to oppose prelacy, and yet to maintain the present constitution 
of the Church, which was prelacy ; and to renounce, and yet affirm, the doctrine 
of non-resistance." — Memoirs of Great Britain and Ireland, by Sir John Dalrymi>U, 
Bart.f 1 771. This Sir John, into whose line the Earldom of Stair has come, repre- 
sented the President's second son. He was a Baron of Exchequer, and father of 
the present Earl. His Memoirs are iustructiTe and amusing, and illustrated with 
origimU materials.] 

• [But the Crown required to have a very sharp eye upon himself (as the event 
proved), and to meet the quirks of treason with the quirks of the law.] 



\ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



315 



' havo nobody there," says Rothes, " to inform for him, and 
counteract tlioso considerable persons who will be informing 
against him, I judge will be very unbecoming a, wise man ; 
and who he aliall send is the question. Argyle ? His father's 
memory stinks there, as here ; neither does either his per- 
Bon, or way of converse, recommend him,"' &c. But if, as 
Hothcs here asserts, the memory of the Earl's father was so 
nnploasaut in the uncovonauted nostrils of lioth countries, 
tJicrc is reason to believe, that the person at least of tlie sou 
gave out the very odour of sanctity. After making his escape 
from the Castle, he came to tuke refuge iu the- house of one 
Mr Bittlestone at Nowcastle, disguised in coarse clothes, and 
conducted by the notorious Veitch, a minister of the most 
treasonable stamp : " After they had got a drink, Mrs Bittle- 
Btone conveyed them to dilTereut rooms ; and after some time 
she went to Argyle's room, being the greatest stranger. He 
had laid down a fine watch and nightcap upon the table, 
which did not answer hie clothes : he had opened up himself, 
which perfumed the room. She came quickly hack to her 
husband, and said, ' I am persuaded this is i^jgyle.'"] 

Though these extremes were gone into with the Earl, it is 
cortftiu there were no serious intentions to deprive him of life. 
King James asserts this in his diary, and his behaviour pre- 
vious to the trial strongly proves his veracity. \Vlieu told by 
some about him that it was a hard thing, for such a trifle, to 
threaten a man with forfeiture of life and fortune, hu ex- 
claimed, — " Life and fortune I God forbid;"' nor would he 
sutler Lady Sophia Lindsay to be whipt through the town of 
Edinburgh, though that was olTen-d by the Lords of Council 

I and Session, who quoted the cruelties exc-rcisod by Argyle 
and hia sect on the Lady Helen Ogilvy ; she, by a similar 
fltratagem, having rescued her brother Lord Ogilvy from the 
claws of these puritanical furies.* The King had sent down 
; 



(QuMDnbarTj Paper*.] 

U Is U be mDcmbnred IhM Ibe Harquw of Ai^lo pot John Sicwatt of Liulr- 
vrall to dMth (kllliough pcrfccti; innoocnt), for Iradag makiag igainM liim, Ar- 
lyk J KDd now hli own wni wu coadomnod undvr Uic auue oLiaolote and •twiieful 

ute Uiw.—Sitt tf Mr Skarjt, 

[See I^v Sophia'* adTFiiturca full)' iUualnlod iu I^inl LtnilM^'n c'urniing 
Lives iiflhe Llndw)*, \\\. U4-U,) 



I 316 MEMORlAt^ OF TltE 

I onlors tliftt no soiitouco should bo put in execution till it hsd 
I obtAinctl his upprobaliou ; and tliougli lie knew his lurkiiig- 
[ place iu London, would not suffur him to be suizod. The 
I DucliGSB of Latidorilalo was said to havo doHGrted her nsaal 
I jimdfuce on this occasion, to shelter the fathoi-iu-h»w of her 
I dttughtor. He at length escaped into Holland ; leaving bo- 

liiud him a manifestation, according to the rigid whigs, of 
I God's judgment upon those who bad ever lent a hand to the 
[ work of persecution ; but, according to the milder, on euuh as 
I were barbarous to the creditors and vassalG of their fathers, 
' and of thozneelves ; as, by the Earl's cruelty, many of that 

description were, according to Fountaluhal], actually etair- 

Argyle had sought and obtained from the Ijaiiderdale Go- 
vernment miUtary aid, to assist him in some of his fends with 
his ilighland neighbours. In a letter from Eothes to Queens- 
< berry, of date 28th May 1679, shortly after tho murder of tho 
Archbishop, tho Chancellor says : — " I was earnestly desired 
by the Committee of the Council, al my Lord Argyle's request, 
to call u Council against the 27th instant, which I did, and 
kept. Tlie aifair we had in hand was, — Argyle's party being 
too BtroTUj for him, he wnuld have had some of our standing 
forces sent to hiti asBistance. But, downright, 1 have carried 
in Council, that we can spare none of them al this juncture. 
It is certain he is in an ill condition ; but if he has brewn wett, 
let bim drink ike better. For we arc assured that thoeo hun- 
dred of the King's forces that are there already, liavc mutinied 
and absolutely denied him assistance, being clearly starved, 
having scarce bread and water to live upon ; and wluch I 
would havo done niysc-Il'. il' in that condition."' 

All natural sympathy for the Eurl of Argyle, upon the me- 
lancholy occasion of his execution, is deadened, and rendered 
ulmost unjust, by the notorious fact, that he was jjrosont at, 
and conspicuously enjoying, along vrith his young bride, the 
last indignities heaped upon the murdered Montrose in IU50, 
Argyle's original aeulcuce may have proceeded upon too nar- 
row grounds ; but the eventual execution of it, was eutiroly 
llif cimpoiiiiencc of liis siibticiiuent invasion of (be kingdom 

' ] yuti'iislwrii I'npiTS.J 



L 



VISCOUNT or DDNDEK. 317 

and throno, — a deadly crime, requiring no now trial in jirovc 
it. No bead ever fell on the scaffold more worthy of tlmt 
dctttli. No sTiviablo memorial of his fame iii this praise of him, 
— " Thus diod this excellent and truly good and groat man,"— 
written by Wodrow, who, in recording the public characters of 
thoae limes, never failed to Bpeak evil of the good, and good 
of the evil. An instance of Wodrow'e disingenfiousness rela- 
tive to tliis great state criminal must here be noted : — He 
weaves a fanatical romance, with vcrl>oBe sentimentality, of a 
placid slumber of the Earl's, after bis last meal, and imnie- 
diat«ly before his execution, which slumbiT, be adds, " affords 
a charming view of the power of religion, and a peace/id con- 
6oiencet in the greatest of shocks." Now, when dressing up an 
apocryphal story of " one of the principal managers" having 
nearly lost his senses, conscience stricken at the unexiiected 
sight of this saint-like repose, Wodrow himself was aware of 
apkj/sical cause, which would have entirely marred bis story, 
had he l>oen so honest as to add it. In bis unpublished Col- 
lections, ho bad noted the following information: " In some 
of the sciiMes of these times, a bullet lighted upon a wall, of 
a castle be (the Earl of Argylc) was in, and rebounding, 
struck him on the head, and cracked his skull; and it wax 
trepanned, and the piece tnken out. This made the Earl that 
be befiovett atill (i. e. always) to sleep after meat an hour or 
more ; and that day he was execute, he behaved to have bis 
eleep after dinner."' The sleep was conia.] 

The squeamishncBs of the Earl, liowever, made a great im- 
pression uiKin the whole body of the whigs, who stonily with- 
stood the t«et. Several persons of rank absolutely refused tt> 
awear it ; and, among others, ae we learn from Wodrow, the 
godly Duchess of Rotbes, who thereby <leprivod herself of her 
power to bold Sheriff courts, or to capacitate others so to do. 
The good woman could swallow no such novelties ; in Booth 
she vftis a teiidcr-cotiscienccd vessel, and would haw choked 
as heartily on this oath, as a sister puritan once did on an 
apple tart bottomed with a fragment of the A|»ocrypha, Tlio 
test in a short time became the touchstone of loyalty, and 
enforced on all susjiected pcisons. The whigs com]>08ed 



[Spo Wodrw'x J fa 



,il compan: uilb hiK Itiilory, W. .103.) 



318 MEMORIALS OF THS 

ttnotlu^r IVrlunition, agtiiiist the IHike of York, the Parlia- 
luont, ami tho IVst. This is termed the Lanark DeclaratioD, 
whirh viTv shortly aftorwanls served to augment the fire in 
wliiih tho SoU'iim Loa^ie and Covenant, the Rutherglen and 
Stiuquhar IKh laratious^aud tho liM called Cargill's Covenant, 
\vrr\» a>usumi'd by oixlcr of the Privy Council of Scotland. 

\\\' have very juirtioular ri»asi>n to know that Claverhorise, 
on tho *jr»ili v>f NovomWr 1681, was nearly drowned in his 
pissii^o fl^Mu I »ruut island to Loith ; for the storm is celebrated 
hv ono Aloxaiulor Tylor* the clergyman of Einnettles, in 
An>;:uss|iiiv, iu a vory curious strain of poetry, entitled, — 
** Tho Touipost, Ikmu*: an account of a dangerous passage from 
Uiirnt Island to Loitlu in a boat called the Blessing, in coni- 
|vtiny ol* Clrtvorhouso, several gimtlowomen, ministers, and a 
wlhUo thr\»n)j of wmmon i^issengers; upon the 26th of No- 
votnlHM\ U»SK Uoprintod 16S5.'' 

** No jKHmor «iOt wo Mil on board tho 6Iessin<|:, 
Whoii Kohi5 >ot a Fowler's ca|M' on Fi^hin*; : 
Aiul whilo wv'n' scarce put forth without the Heads, 
Nopnino «tpits oVr our mast his water}* beads. 
S^Hinor than you can wink« tho fiirious jsrale 
I.iko 5hot miMon till tolt, doth us assail ; 
And what on shor\^ sotnns but a g'ist to them, 
Im to us a storm mi^ht U>ar a tempest *s name. 
We climb straight hills of seas, as if we meant 
To invade the Heavens and scale the firmament ; 
And when we're on the steep wave's further breast, 
We seem to seek the centre for our rest ; 
We skip on Si'as proud toi>s, as if we tlew, 
Anon plung'd down, as if Hell's mouth we plow. 
A water}' dust the foaming billows raise, 
Puiling rain upwards, mingling clouds with seas ; 
Each monstrous mountain wave still upward hies, 
With waten' mouth to kits and wet the skies ; 
And underneath so deep a rolling pit. 
That HelPs a shallowness compared to it.*' 

[After much in tho same strain, descriptive of a dreadful 
storm, tho poet toutihos on the effect of all this upon the 
nerves of the skipper Douglas and his sailors, the ministers 



laSCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



319 



' (described as more apt to preach contempt, of death than 

evince it practically), ClaverhoUBe, the gentlewomen, and the 

Ihoraus. The lines bestowed on Claverhouse, to whom ho ia 
more complimentary, are as follows,] 



" Courage is still the aame, on land, at sea ; 
He wLo can boUly kill darei bravely die. 
Yet ho nhoM ire hath smiled on seua of blood,' 
Looks pule on water, id hii coolest mood; 
Sonldien slern fire abhors the dcatb ot slaves ; 
It can't ret-isl, nor vengeance wreck on wuves. 
Mars crops Lis fame on oampa. Gelds, cities hie, 
Bat what's ten thousnnd nworda against a sea? 



The sea bears ui 
Of Buui]- tuns, ti 
We shako our en 
We creep on ahi 
That we 'scap'd 



and we bear up a sea 

Leiib'i port, custom free. 

■9, hats, clothes, and in a trice 

-e, like water-ducked flics. 

maws, and our last fishing. 



God, by good Douglat, gave us't with a Bttuing."* 



I 



King Charles the Second observed, that there never was a 
Tttbellion in Scotland without & Campbell or a Dalryniple at 
tlie bottom of it. 

" To Stair allow, as he deserves, much space, 
And round about hlni ibe Dalr]rui|i1o rac« ; 
Describe bow the}' their Sovereign did betray, 
And sold their nation's liberty away."' 

The exertions of Clavprhouso to repress whiggery, were 
mncJi opposed by Sir John DalrjTnplo of Stair. From the re- 
mission granted in 1086 to the exiled President, 8ir Jamee 
Dalrymple, (through the interest of his eon, Sir John, who at 

< [This must rvfer to the rasown arqaiml by ClavsrhooH uDclar tlie Prince of 
Orangn ; for hs bad aoiuirtd no fame in Sootfauid as " Bloixly CUvan," so early 
as lUOI.I 

■ This poem is (iriDted at the (tid uf odd mach longer, called " Hemirin (rf th* 
Life and Aclians of the moat invinciblv uiil triimi|>hBiit Prlneo John the Groat, 
third of Ibat name, prtscnl King of Poland,*' A.C. " lUiaborgb, prinlod by tb* 
heir of Andraw AndDrsan."~JV'i>U iy Mr Sharpt. 

' Slruan Kobertton*! ailtjce In a paiiitur.- — XoU lif Mr Skarju. 



320 MEMORIALS OF THE 

tliat time contrived to be made Lord Advocate,) it appears, 
that tlio c»td man had not only favoured the meaner TebeL>, 
hut fost4}red tlic prophet Peden, and other vagrant preachers, 
in his house, where he had them preaching, and baptizing 
children. [Wodrow himself gives us the terms of the remis- 
sion : " In February, 1686, Sir James Dalrymple of Stair's son 
irt made King's Advocate, and it had not been decent for the 
son to manage a criminal process against so good a man, and 
father ; and therefore, that day when he is admitted, the father's 
l)r(.)ces8 is delayed till March 28th, when a remission is pro- 
duced, read and recorded, to Sir James Dalrymple of Stair, for 
his resetting, harbouring, and receiving mail and duty from 
rel)ols and traitors, upon his ground, in the years 1679, 80, 
81, 82, 83 ; John Dick in Banban, Quintin Dick in Dalmel- 
lington, and many others ; and for resetting and harbouring 
Mr Alexander Lennox, Mr Alexander Boss, Mr Alexander 
Pi^den, and Mr Alexander Hamilton, vagrant preachers, and 
suffering them to preach, and baptize children in his house, 
and for his drawing a petition for, and advising some of the 
rebels."* We may judge of the principles, and the com- 
panionship, which had driven so able a President from the 
Bench, and from his country, when it is remembered, that 
Mr Alexander Peden is the man who laid his hand publicly 
and solemnly upon the head of a sturdy disciple, and said, — 
" John, have at the unhappy race of the name of Stewart : 
Olf the throne of Britain they shall go, if all the world would 
set side and shoulder to keep them on."' And this, too, ex- 
plains the meaning of a passage we have elsewhere quoted, 
from one of Claverhouse's letters to Queensbcrry, where he 
says, writing on the 5th of March 1682, from Wigtonshire, — 
** Here in the shire I find the lairds all following the example 
of a late great man, and still a considerable heritor here among 
them ; which is, to live regularly themselves, but have their 
houses constant haunts of rebels and intercommuned persons, 

» [Wodrow, Ilirt. iv. p. 355. 

« October ] 6U2. Sir James Dalrymple of Stairs, late President of the SessioD, 
feariDg to bo apprehended and impeached, fled to Holland, and afterwards was 
summoned at the pier of Leitli for compearance." — Late** Memoriah, p. 236.] 

a [See before, p. 151.] 



^^HJ^^B VISCOONT OF DUNDEE. 321 

and have their childreu baptized by the same ; and then lay 
all the l)lame on their wives, condemning them, and ewearing 
they cannot help what is done in their absence. But I am 
resolved this jeat shall pass no longer hero ; for it is laughing 
and fooling the Government ; and it will be of more conse- 
quence to punish one considcrahle laird, than a hundred little 
bodies, Besides, it is Juater ; because these only sin by the 
example of those."'] 

Sir John Dalrymplo's principles, though well known, had 
ever oscai>ed punishment through his consummate cunning. 
To save his own and his father's tenants from the imposition 
of fines (imposed by Claverhouac in terms of his commission), 
he pretended to fine them himself, as heritable Bailie of th« 
Regality of Glenluce. He stirred up sedition in Galloway by 
every method in his power ; and resisted, by virtue of his own 
heritable office, the powers conferred upon Claverhouse by the 
Privy Council. Ho put rebellious persons as deputes in his 
office, and refrained from administering the test to them long 
after the time prescribed by act of Parliament. He, together 
with his father, offered £150 it> Captain Graham to connive at 
the irregularities of his mother the Lady Stairs, hie sisters, 
and others ; and when Graham had proclaimed a Court to be 
held, did insolently laugh at it, and forbid hia vassak to at- 
tend. At a head Court, he liimself produced an instrument 
agitiuet that officer, alleging that he had exacted free quar- 
ters for his men ; and he afterwards pretended that the people 
were not bound to furnish hay and straw lo the troops. Their 
commander laid hold of some of his tenants, and elapt them up 

' [See before, p. 13lt ; vid tioti, where Clnvorlinune's klliuiaD to ' a Ule gi«sl 
nuui," wa had ernmeoiuly refemd U> Sir John Dklrj'mplo. Unitaubtvdlj', liia 
bthcr Sir Jaco«, tho cx-Prendent, i« meul ; whiwe rullpg-rldM' Of ■ wife, Duue 
Margwpl Bau, bH twrD h po<r«rfuJly cmboilrod bjrSir Wklur Scoii.iaUutt dnad- 

IAil pomnage Iho mothrr of " huey AihMti." Thn kboro quoin) iDnouniWDMnl 
17 ClarerhoUK Hiffii-wnUj ucounls for U» tiralenMi wilh which Sir John Dal- 
■jtnpl* [nimcdialDif MulJed liitn in ■ prtwoea of cumpUJnt kddnwDd U> the Vny<j 
ObumcII. The womlt wu » ■ndden »Dd cunning, BOd m llUlo dispaailioii wm 
IbtTB unuDg the great mon to Ikvour the riaing GnUiatn, lluti the euc, impurfeell.t 
IBilinl 1. al llrM aeomed to go agaiail hioi. But Clarerliouiw, who well knrw 
MHt all the truth wb« villi htmMlf, aa wall aa erary prindpl* of jiwlioe, and Hnnd 
foHc}', iaii>t«d span ■ mora «oinpl«l« invattigallon, ai>d anooMdad in aapoajng Ih* 
Ifalnrv hero uf Olnneoe.l 
1 ^ 



322 MEMORIAI^ OF TUS 

ill jail till tlioy should pay the fines he thought fit to impofie. 
Sir John, in high dudgeon, applied to the Privy Council, 
alleging that ho himself had hefore fined these fellows ; whom, 
accordingly, the Council liberated. But Graham, unable to 
brook this, some time afterwards gave in a bill of complaint 
against Sir John, stating his misconduct, and complaining 
that he had defamed him to the Privy Councillors, by affirm* 
ing, that he exacted free quarters, and fines which were never, 
or at least falsely, accounted for to the Exchequer ; that he 
had usurped the King's privilege, hj pardoning Hay of Park, 
and others guilty of fanaticism ; and that all this falsehood 
was contained in a libel against him, which Sir John had m- 
tenihd to i)roscnt to the Council, and which ought to be 
proved ; or the author of such infamous scandal pimished. 

Sir John's answers were read, and the Chancellor reproved 
him for his tart reflections on Captain Graham's " ingenuity.* 
He offered probation of some points, but that was disallowed. 
Fimntainhall, who was one of Sir John's advocates, says that 
there was much " transport, flame, and hiunour" on the occa- 
sion. Sir John alleging that the people in Galloway were 
orderly and irgular, Graham answered, that there were as 
many vicphants and crocodiles, in Gklloway, as loyal or regular 
persons.^ Finally, and after mature consideration, the Council 
found that Olaverhouse had done nothing but what was en- 
tin^ly legal, and agreeable to the tenor of his commission 
nutl instructions ; the Chancellor, Aberdeen, telling him, that 
ho and his oolloaguos were surprised by the wariness with 
which ho. not l>oing a lawyer, hatl conducted himself, in so 
irn\^nhu* a part of Scotland ; and giving him the Council's 
tl^anks I (ov it apjKM^rs, the AVest had been brought into con- 
formity and n^lornnUion through his means. But Sir John, 
though a hnvyor. and Ikilie of the Regality of Glenluce, was 
found to havo oxooodcd his bounds, weakened the hands of his 
M*\ioi*ty*H authority and Councils, and their commissions, and 
lo ha\o intorl\Mvd with them; and therefore, they declared 

^ \\\v \\*%\ ih0 UmiI rk|ioH<»iir<> of this. The outburst about elephants and croco- 
Utki* aututi«(«Ni « \t*\\\ \4 »ii««rgrlic humour which ClaTerhouse frequently displayed. 
U u 4U^iMU|i hi rtuti Ihtf wliig l«w}««r, Fountainhall, chiding the figuratiye expres- 
»ivU| v^ilh itu^Al gi'avil;! • an a Mil tkim^ to tajf itfa whole dUiriei.^ 



VISOOUNT OP DDNDEE. 



323 



the said Sir John to lose his heritable hailiery during liie life- 
time : and to piiy A'500 nterlimf of fine ; and to enter that night 
(I'ith Feliruary 1683) into prison in the castle of Edinburgh, 
to lie there not only till he paid it. bat during the Council's 
pleasure. 8ome wore for £1000 sterling fine. On tlio 20th 
ho was liberated, after having paid his fine, acknowledged Iiia 
rashness, and requested pardon of the Council' 

Thia Sir John was son of Sir James Dalrymple Presi- 
dent of the Court of Session, who Lad been turned out of his 
office for his behaviour resijectiug the test, which he first in 
part framed, and then would not subscribe ; and having a very 
nest in his estatcfl towards which the whigs flew, lie thought 
fit at this time to retire to Holland, lest he should be more 
severely handled for bis misdeeds. He wiis restored to his 
office, and created a Viscouut, by the Prince of Orangi:, after 
the Revolution. Sir John, his son before mentioned, the first 
Earl of Stair, was a fl.igitious wTclch, a very disgrace to human 
nature. After ttiis castigation, bestowed ujion him by Claver- 
bouso, ho was again seized, and confined for thrco months in 
the Tolbootb of Edinburgh, from whence it would have been 
iuclcy for his reputation had bo boon conducted to conclude 
his Ufe in the Grrassmarket. But he contrived to preserve 
himself, and acted the hypocrite so artfully, that King James, 
in the year 1687, actually made him Lord Advocate in the 
place of Sir (Jeorgo Mackenzie, who opposed the repeal of the 
penal laws against popery. In this station the naughty varlet 
ran into all the measures of the Court, and as violently sided 
with the promoters of the Revolution. But this is saintly in- 
nocence to what ensued; for ho was the principal contriver 
«nd abettor of the massacre of Qloncoc, a piece of villaiiy 
wliich reflects an everlasting reproach upon our annal8,^-A 
scene of blood that should bo buried in otemal oblivion. 
Lockhart, in his history of the Union, assL-rts, that he was the 
origin, and principal instrument, of all the misfortunes which 
befel the King and kingdom. That be bragged of having ad- 
vised James to repeal the penal laws in order to ruin bini. 
That he, underhand, carried on the Revolution in Scotland in 
the same manner as Lord Sunderland mauagud it in l-higland. 

■ FooiiUlnhnH.Vp. 191,»l,*»,-JVuf*tj, JfrSlorjw. 



i%i MEMORIALS OF THE 

That he was the contriver of Glencoel; and had a prindpal 
hand in the plot trumped up to destroy the Cavaliers and 
country parties in Scotland, by means of that scoundrel Simon 
Lord Lovat. Mr Laing, giving an account of Dalrymple's 
nefarious conduct respecting the affair of Glencoe, observeB, 
that he had imbibed the bloody spirit of Lauderdale's adminis- 
tration. In the first place, he had Httle or nothing to do with 
Lauderdale's administration. Secondly, it is needless to suji- 
pose adventitioua causes, for the sake of party, when there is 
such apparent original wickednees. But this is a true sample 
of the science ofreflectton (in liistorical composition), and Mr 
Laing'e work can furnish a great many more. Sir John him- 
self might have instructed and matured the worst administra- 
tion in the world. If ho caught anything from Duke Lauder- 
dale's, 'twas in the manner tliat Falstaff did from Doll Tear- 
sheet : 

" Fal. We cjitch of you, Doll, wo catch of ;ou ; grant that, m; poor 
virtue, grant that. 
DoU. Ly, marry ; oar chaira, and our jeietU." 

No punishment pursued liis crimes in this world ; for William 
and Anne supported and ennobled him ; and the jMDpular de-_ 
testation under which he existed, could in no manner affect 
a creature of his base dispositions. In after times, when 
ui^ng the union of the kingdoms, Fletcher of Saltoun plainly 
told him, in the face of the Parliament, that had he obtained 
hie due reward, he would have been hanged long before that 
time. He died of an apoplexy, before the completion of the 
union.' 

[The admirable tact and tem])er \\'ith which Claverhouse, 
in 1682, effected a reformation in Galloway, the whole influ- 

■ [It U reiDArksble tb&t Claverhouse, Charlra Shurpe, and Lord Macaulaj, are 
all agreed aa to tlie charoctoT of the Blateaman of Glencoe. la a tett«r (o Qjieens- 
berry, of date 19th May I6e<, ClaverhoUBc pawionalfilj eiclairos,— "Tho Duta {of 
York) IE jnslor than lo charge my Lord Diindonalil with Sip John's (Dairymple) 
Crimea ; he is a mad nun, aiid let him [>prisli ; they deserve lo be damned would 
own him." Lord Macaulay has diBoovered two blots in the chiirBiiler of King Wil- 
liam : Tst, He "devoured the whole dinli of the first grnen peas of the year, without 
offarine a gpoonfal to the Prineoas Auue ;** 2d, Ho commilted " a great fault, a 
fault amouflfinj (o o .jn'nie,"~in not having kangid Sir John Dotryufdr!^ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



325 



ence of tlio house of Stair working against liim, shaU presently 
be illustrated from his own correepondence. The quiet, in- 
deed, was very tt-mijorary, and he had no great faith in it him- 
self, uulcss Government would estahlish sufficient garrisone 
throughout that inflamed district. He obtained, however, 
much credit for what he had done, and in certain quarters 
excited no little jealousy. His success is particularly pointed 
at in a commendatory poem of the period, entitled, — " The 
Muse's Now Year's Gift, and Hansell, to the right honoured 
Captain John Gniliam of Claverbouse : January IG83." These 
inharmonious numbers are only worthy of being quoted for 
ii.o ^bfl of a Taw {hcXh thev contain : 



Sutini euUjiu.—P. 324. 
In a quoMition from one of CI«vephoiu»> letters to the Duke of 
Queensbeiry (given in a noW to p. 324 of thi« Tolume), wherein he pr... 
nounces of « certain " Sir JwA«," that,—" he i> a roadman, and let him 
periih ; the), dewrve to be dstoned would own hira,"— we bad lw*tih- 
assjnied this to bo meant of Sip John Dalrymple of Stair. On recon- 
luderaiion, we believe it to applj- lo Sir John Cochrane of Ochiltree, u 
will be ibown more particularly in our neat volume, conl*ioing the 
whole letter. 



ITio bravo rt/ormtr o/ijreai Ualluway-antrt, 

I hojw hu will to ColanrCi ]>lHce ajplru : 

His niartiaJ troops dooa scour around the liutjn. 

So that no hole a iholtor rel>ets yields ; 

On Uali-yuii win^-a, Soula' glory iloea reitons, 

Bejoad the ocean, to Columbua' aborc."* 

By his contest with Sir John Dalrymplo, Claverhouso uot 
only obtaiued the opportunity of triumphantly proving that 
his whole proceedings were entirely cousistont with nii iiiiini- 

> ( rrinl^ from Iho MS. in tlio " Fugitiv* Scull 
edited by David Laing, E*|, laSA.] 



' of the 17lh tVntnrj ; 



8S0 MEMORIALS OF TUB 

peachabte exercise of hia commisaiiin, and a most judicions ' 
fulfilmout of his duty, but the confidonec in his abilities and 
energy thus inspired, led to immediate and high promotion. 
In ft letter from the Uuke of York to Queensberry, dated 
2d December 1682, his Royal Highness says, — " I am abso- 
lutely of your mind as to Claverhouse ; and think his presence 
more necessary in Galloway than any where elae ; for he need 
not fear any thing Stairs can say of him, his Majesty being so 
well satisfied with hiiu."' Accordingly, not many days there- 
after, he receives the following new commission, dated White- 
hall, 25th December 1682, superscribed by Charles the Second, 
countersigned by the Secretary Middleton, and addieeaed to 
" John Graham of Clavprhouse, greeting" : — 

" Having now for the good of our service, thought fit to 
form into a regiment, those three standing troops of horse 
(excluding our troop of guard) in our ancient kingdom of 
Scotland, and to order the raising of a fourth to be added 
thereunto, We, being very well informed, and having had fre- 
quent proofs of your loyalty, courage, and good conduct, have 
nominated, constituted, and appointed, and by these presents 
do nominate, conatitut-e, and appoint you to be Colonel of our 
said regiment of horse, as also Captain of a troop therein. 
You are therefore carufully and diUgcutly to discharge the 
duty of a Colonel and Captain respectively, by exercising the 
same in arms, both officers and soldiers, and keeping them in 
good order and discipline. And we do hereby command them 
to obey you as their Colonel and Captain respectively ; and 
yourself likewise exactly to observe and follow all such orders, 
directions, and commands, as you shall from time to time re- 
ceive from Us, our most dear and most entirely beloved bro- 
ther James Duke of Albany and York, our High Commis- 
sioner, or our Privy Council of tliat our kingdom, our Lieu- 
tenant-Goneral and Commander-in-chief of our forces there, 
now or for the time being, or any other your superior officer, 
according to the rules and discipline of war, in pursuance of 
the tnist reposed in you."]' 



. [Duiit 



■ri-y P-i«™.] 



(■ Kins writea lo hi* Caunoil io Suul- 
.vi> tliuuglit lit, far tlie good of inir kot- 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 327 

On the 24th of August, 1682, died, near Tiinhridge Wells, 
John Duke uf Lauderdale, who during a great part of hia sway 
over Scotland, was ahuoat an absolute monarch there. His 
declining credit at Court, and hia prodigious bulk, were thought 
to have hastened his death. He was Earl of Lauderdale, 
Marquis of March, and Duke of Lauderdale in Scotland ; Baron 
Petersham and Earl of Guildford in England. He preserved 
hia credit with the King longer than any other statesman, and 
time alone, which dulled his extraordinary faculties, withdrew 
the confidence of his master.' Though he had acquired im- 
mense sums of money at various periods, yet bis extravagance 
equalled his rapacity, and the Duchess took care to secure so 
much of his estate, and other property, to herself, that his 
brother (Charles Maitland, Lord Hatton), who was his male 
heir, hod little to boast of in the richness of his succession. 
Hatt«n went to law with her Grace concerning her legacies; 
and for a long time the heads of the law lords were distracted 
witli their litigation.' 

When the Duchess of Lauderdale came down to Scotland, 
she took euch state upon her, and proved so rapacious, that 
she speedily incurred the hatred of the whole nation, which 
vented itself iu a variety of lamjioous, still preserved in MS., 
more remarkable for their ill-nature than delicacy. A parody 
was made on Lord Dorset's aoug, beginning, — " Methiiiks tlu3 
poor tomi has been troubled too long,' — which gives a list of 
the Duchess's lovers : 



I'mr, to rrdnco a 
guanti of Uml oi 



hundred •oldiera out uf tbe Il'ii oompkoie* of our nglnimt of 
■ uidmt fciDgduro, being Uo oul uf every eoni))«iij', uiil u lOKay 
ikDded bjt llio Earl iif Mtr ; u also, aiiio lianKioeti out 
nf nach uf our lliroc (late inilc!|ieii>leDl) Iniop* oT lionw lien, in urder to Uio niisjiig 
(ir* new tniii)> uf hiime, tn be added tu the othsr tlireu,aiida]l tlio tour to befonaed 
lulu a regiiDent of liorM, wlierear we hate aiipainted our right trualjr and well-be- 
luvod John Qrahim of ClaTSrlioiiiie tu be Colonel," — ihcrerom the Council ar« in- 
quired to iaaue (lie nee ewa ry order* tu Ibu Licatenaot'GtDeTml eommandtng in 
chief. — I'riry CoatieU HtyitUr.^ 
^^^^ ' {Tbo oorreapoiuteDce lo b« produMid in a lubeFqapnt jiart of thMa Hemoriala, 

^^^L will pruce the aeeuracy uf llii* alateincDt b/ Ur Sliarpe ) 

^^H [* The Duke of Yurb, in a letter bi (luKnabcrry.datedJune 3d, I UII2, raferring 
^^^K to Lauderdalr, tLjit,—'' I bollav* \m will not hold mil much longer, being ao very 
^^^B brokeu both ill uiideralatiding aud ho>\y."- (fmrmtl-trry /'<i/wrT ] 



338 U!^M<)R!AI.S OF THE 

" M«liiiiika this poor land hatli bveii troubled loo lonp. 
Wilb Hatton, uid Dvsart, wiJ old Lidington,— 
While justice provokes me in rliynie to exprcM 
The truth whieh I know of mj- bo:inie old Beas. 
She la Ueu of my heart ; she wn9 Besa of Old Noll ; 
8ho was once Fleetwcud'a Bcm, and she's row of AUioleil| 
iShe's Bessie of Church, and Bussie of State, &c. &c. 

After she had contrived to make the Duke settle every thing 
he could upon herself and her son by Sir Lionell Tolmache, 
she was accused of using liiui most cruelly during a disorder 
brought on by old age, chagrin, and extreme corpulence.' She 
died June 1696, and was buried at Petersham. Her son, 
Lionell, Lord Dysart, was as covetous as his mother, if we can 
rely upon the authority of Mrs Mauley, who styles him an 
"old curmudgeon," and says he kept a house like the temple 
of famine ; well nigh starving his son, Lord Huntingtower, 
who married, contrary to bis inclination, a natural daughter of 
the Duke of Devousbire. 



1R83. 
Claverhouse, in tbe south, severely searched for delinquents, 
causing much terror to the wlitgs, who retired to the moun- 
tainous parts of Galloway and Nithsdale, where tbey were 
joined by many persons of their persuasion from other parts 
of Scotland. The soldiers (commanded parties) came upon the 
houses of the suspected in the night. According to Wodrow, 
Graham made great use of one Jolm Gib in these affairs, who 
went through the parish of Carsphaim, and the neighbour- 
hood, with little hooks and sermons to sell, pretending to be a 
whig, by which meaus he got into the confidence of the party, 
hut was at length discovered by them. He also records 
how he seized upou one David M'Millau, who had been at 
Bothwell, and sent liim into Edinburgh to be tried, where be 
stood stoutly to his principles, and was hanged in the Grass- 
markfet, 16th May, 1683. [And, however stoutly he deler- 

' [Sir George HacksDiie of Tai'bet, writimf to Qucensbcrrj, from Wiudsor, 
?6Ul AusuBl I'iKS, n^H,— " TLie UuuhiMi of Lauderdale halfa crowned her kindiMa 
lu lier lale lord, by urging bim to drink Die waters, which all foretold would kill 
1 land so it lintti fallen out tvvoTiiaglf.'—QiucnilKFTg Popm.} 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



329 



^^V mined to die, RUrely do one more deservedly, and as & measure 
^^H of Justice and necessity, was ever consigned into the liands of 
^^H the hangman. From hia apologist Wodrow himself we learn, 
that, when before the committee of Council, — " Being asked 
who took him, and for what ? He answered, Claverhouse, for 
heing at Bothwoll.' Then he was questioned. Do you not 
count Bothwell rebellion ? No, answered be, it waa in defence 
of the truth. Next ho waa asked, do you acknowledge law- 
ful authority P He answered, he is not a Christian that does 
not BO. But, add they, do you acknowledge the present 
authority ? Answer, — ' In so far as he /talk kept his engage- 
ment, according to the word of God,' Then he was asked, 
' will you take on to be a soldier, and go over the sea ? for if 
you abide here you will bo hanged ? He answered, — ' being 
under your power now, I will not cut out mine own lot.'" 
Such, under the teaching, and denunciations, of tboir dastardly 
preachers, who were ever more anxious lo press tlio crown of 
martyrdom upon their disciples, thiiu to wear it themselves, is 
as we have seen, tlie common ty]io of all those sainted 
sufferers whom Wodrow canonizes, and uijon whose martyr- 
doms, mingled with many vile falst^boods, he founds that 
satanic character of Claverhouao, and other statesmen, which 
Lord Maoaulay has coudescondiid to olectroty|ie. Tliis man 
Da\'id M'Millan, besides what we have quoteil, obstinately re- 
fused lo admit that the death of the Primate was a murder. 
He repeated refused the t«st olTored Iq him to save his life. 
" Ho was t<>ld," says Wodrow, " there was yet room to re- 
nounce his ill principles that took liim to Bothwell, by taking 
tlio t^st." He refused. " The Assize brought him in guilty 
of being at Bothwell in arms, and judicially owning the law- 
fulness of joining with those who were there ; and the Lords 
adjudged htm to bo hanged at ihe Gtrassmarket, May 16th, 

I'twixt two and four in the afternoon. When the dompster 
was reading his sentence, he was stopt in the middle, and 
Ditvid was t«ld. if the sentence was read out, he could not get 
it recalled, and ttie test vras ofTered hiia. His answer was, — 
On on; and when it was read out, one of them said, ' What 
think you of it now?' David answered, il was very wel- 
I [Siuwlj n vcr) giw'J r\ni-iii for lii» Iwiiig 4i'r>ielii>iiar.l.) 



330 MEMORIALS OF THE 

come."* There are moiles of obtaining the crown of maitytwV 
dom through the gallows, for those who have boon excited to | 
their ruin by some toad at their ear, which not the utmost 
forl>earance, and ingenuity, of the most Immane tribunal on 
eartli, could by any possibility prevent.] The farewells of the 
whigs should have been couched more in the words of Col- 
ledge, the Protestant Joiner : — 

" A long farewell to all that's great. 

Daring and bold in mortal wight, 
FarcwoU my burning zeal and bent, 

1 now must bid you all good night 
The fatnl rope, 
Buie of my hope. 
Has ruin'd k11 the mighty feat, 

" Adieu my horie, my blunderbuss. 

My bulf, my case of pistols ake, 
Which should have brought nil under us, 

And made the popish Tories sneak ; 
Adieu ya whiga, 
Poor protoataut pigs, 
The Tories now will thunder ua." 

On the 22d of May, (1683), Graham of Claverhouse was 
made a Privy Counsellor for his unwearied diligence in the 
service of the Goverment. About the same time, the Scottish 
Council resolving that Circuit Courts would have a salutary 
effect in the fanatical shires, obtained the King's approbation 
of their plan, and published a proclamation appointing them 
to be held in three following mouths. The test was to be ad- 
ministered freely to those delinquents who were willing there- 
by to escape from punishment. On June the fourth, just 
before the judges went upon the circuit, the Covmcil appointed 
Gralmm of Claverhouse, Urquhart of Meldmm, Riddell of 
Haiiiing, Kor of Graden, Major Wliite, Sir John Whiteford of 
Milton, nnd John Skene of Halyards, — who had received com- 
mission from the Council, or Treasurer, concerning the dis- 
covery of rebels or their resetters, and for securing and 
sequestrating their goods, — with their depiites, and clerks, to 
attend the Justices with their books, papers, depositions, and 



■[Wm 



i. J56.J 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 331 

any informations thuy could give, and that tliey ebuuld bo in 
readiness to depone on oath concerning any person guilty of 
treason, or reset of rebels, or wbatevor should be enijuired of 
them by the Justices. 

lu these circuits the fanatics met with deserved measure 
of correction. In June the Court sat io Dumfries. In the 
account of the tonn's expenses on tliat occasion, the foUoniug 
items occur : " June 26th (1683), Item, from the said day to 
the second day of July, being six days, for a pound of caudle 
ilk uigbt to Claverhouse's troop when they kept guard the 
time the Judges were here, — ^£1, lOa., Scots. Ilnn, for deals 
and nails for taisiog a seat to my Lord Justice-Clerk, — 
£2, 10s., 5cote,"Ac., Ac.» 

[This important Justiciary Circait, which commenced at 
Stirling on the 5th of Juno, 1683, was inaugurated by an 
event which Wodrow well knew afforded the strongest justi- 
fication for that activity on tlie part of the Goveniment he is 
pleased to record as persecution, and therefore ho narrates the 
eveut in bis accustomed Jesuitical manucr. " Towards the 
beginning of June," he says, " a party of soldiers, who had 
seized one Alexander Smith, an outlawed countryman, and 
and were carrying him, / think, to Edinburgh,' were attacked 
by some few country people, friends to the said Alexander, in 
arms at Inchbelly Bridge, six miles from Glasgow, in the road 
to Edinburgh, and Ibo prisoner w&s by force taken from them. 
In the rencounter some were wounded on hoth aUtca, and ono 
of the soldiers was killed. The country people retired with 
their friend tn good order, and went off." In short, Wodrow 
here indicates his owu liistoric pride and pleasure, in that 
brilliant success in arms of his friends " the suflering rem- 
nant," But mortals would call this a violent and treasonable 
deforcement, by armed rebels, rescuing a state prisoner from 
the custody of the niilitury, one of whom they slaughter in 
that desperate act Our chronicler then proceeds to record 
the unreasonably violent conduct of the military — Lord 

^^^^ I (A fultcr llliulnljoii of ihs ptocndlop of Hid Cowt, Mid ol CbrariuuH-'a 

^^^^E ptft tbtfUKj *■!! to rounil III Uw furt of (Imw UcnioriKb ennUinicg lii* ounaa- 



332 



MEVOBIALS or THE 



Mftcaulav's A]kiU}-uu aud Beelzebub — after Ibeir defeat. " The 
eoldiere rallied in a little time, and in tpfol rage and /urg 
fell a searching the places near by, though by tlua time ihe 
\)&Tty who liad attacked them were n>tLrod a good way from 
(iiem ; and in a wood, not far from the place of action, they 
found John M'Wbany, aud Jume^ Smith, sitting without 
any anns, bailing two only walking staves in tbeir hauda." 
These cunning delinquents, it seems, eventaally suffered the 
last penalty of the law applicable to such mnrderons treason, 
and BO became duly canonized and rrowneii, in the " Cloud 
■Witnesses," after the glorious Eevolution of 1688. But Wi 
row maintains ihat they were not of the party who deforced 
tlie military. " Some papers say " — ^his usual mode of proof,— "^ 
" that tlie soldiers suborned two of their number to depone they 
saw them kill the soldier at Incbbelly Bridge, when tbe pri- 
soner was relieved ;" and forthwith the martyrologist proceeds 
stoutly to argue that these were innocent men, consigned by 
a lawless government to the horrible fate of felons and mur- 
derers.' Wodrow gave his own version when he said, tlmt 
this was a " rencounter," in which " some were wounded ou 
both sides" It was an ambuscade, as cowardly as it was 
deadly ; and ere long a like bloody scene, equally disastrous 
to the military, was enacted at Enterkin Path. The lurking 
felons at Incbbelly Bridge carried off the rescued prisoner, 
eecaj-iing in perfect safety themselves. On the 8th of June, 
(1683), Duke Hamilton (the leader of the opposition cabal 
against the measures of the Court), thus writes to the Prime 
Minister, Queensberry : — 



Uie 
bey^H 



" Tbe occasion of ibis letter is to (ell you, th&l this day the Marquii 
of Montrose, being at dinnor wltli rae, an express followed bim from 
Glasgow Ui let him know, that, at Inclibelly Bridge, a party of five of j 
tbe Guards bringing a prisoner from Edinburgh that Uiey call Smith, i 
was Bet on by twelve of the rebels, who rescued the prisoner, and killed I 
two of the Guards on the place. 1 am afraid this shall not be the last I 
of these disorders, if we have many declared fugitive. I have given 
direclionp, to all my concerns hareabouts, lo iuform themselves of any 
rebels that is seen, and give me notice ; and we shall have a great 



'[W 



i. ].. m.) 



vrSCOCNT OF DUNDKE. 



333 



nambor here on Monday (if the heritors of thitt ahirc, to go to meet the 
JusUeea at Glusgow, where your comm&ndB, if you have any for me, 
will find me for some days, I have ordered my Sheriff-depute to send 
ftn express to you with this." 

On the following <laj, his Grace again writes to the Lord 
Treasurer, dating from " Hamilton, 9th June, nine in the 
morning :" — 

" The alann the Marquis of Montrose got here, of a party of his 
troop being beat, and a prisoner relieved, put ub in some confusion ; 
then supposing the party of rebels had been greater than they were 
that had done it ; but as I wrote to you, having sent ont sevcrals to 
try about it, I find they were but seven footmen of the rebels, who had 
darned tbeniselvcs in a bouse, on a strait pass on the high way, and 
when the live of the guard came by witb the prisoner, they surprised 
them, and shot one dead, hurt atiothor, and relieved the prisoner. 
This you will think pretty bold, for seven foot to attack five of the 
Guards, and come lafi off] without any loss. They dissipate at a moss, 
a little on the side of the place, and three of them came to the south, 
and four went westward. Of the three that came this way, some of my 
people had the good fortune to catcb two,' who was brought here last 
night, and the imaUnUtt rogues tbat ever I spoke to. When I 
examined them, they would scarce give roe civil answers, let he to 
confess a word. I sent immediately to Glasgow for a party to carry 
them away, which came Ibis morning by five, and dispatching them is 
the reason I have been so long in doing so to your footman."*] 

[So these two were nut ■ppnihciiHleO, ■• Wodrow liaa it, b> tlie wMien, " ia 
gnat rage luid fury," batbj' Iho Duksof Hamilton'* pmplo, and brought batoni 
li GntM, berilabJe SherilT of tbo diririol, for cKamiaatinii.J 
< [Qwruhrrry Paptrt. The wrttor is WiUUm DouglB', DuIlb of Hamiltoti, of 
whom aflorainU, The Marqala of Montroac mentioned, i* tho third Marquis, wlio 
wrote to atxnettij ■bool ClBrerhooic joining the Guards. Sec b<ifi>n>, p. INS, 
Tbia tiKut protnlaing j'oung nobleman died, hj ftu untjinel)' file, in Ihe mouth of 
April following, much braonted. Tho Duke cif York than writcn to Qnccaitlwrr)', 
In B letter dated Loudon, lit Hay, 1 UG4 i — ** I harr had HEvgral of youn to anawor, 
the but of which ia of Ihe SAlh, and ■lull ool;' lell you now, that I v*a very much 
troubled to bnr by il tlut my Lord Hoatniao wna dead. The Kint; bu bad a 
grsal km of bim. A> In bl* Irm^, bia Majaaly luu been plaaurd lu nnifar it iijun 
Ijori liviDgMon, that la tbe Lieutenant. Tlie Comet Mumy will b« advauoed i 
and 1 inmd id deain bia Hajraty to gtrn tba Curnrt'e plaoe tu Captain IIddw, 
that ooniouuida the greaailin* ; aad h<« company to Mvldnini'a bmlfaer, that la 
r in Uumbuion'a reginMnt.") 



%u 






T>;'; ^>/r.riCi\ thryn^x fir thas L^isfcanife ^hiTnIii be Iiabfe ia 

with TC4A Ik r/n^>ir o^Miiuiie ccLVrr.^i'iJtr. ihi* Li:ris sent: tip 
r^;*»^/T** ty, thf: KiLg. ^lA, saj* W>ir :w. -^ in. ia:*w"^=r Src^a the 
Ki/ijr ^^r/jf; 'lowTi. Fef>TTL4rT 12, il»?>4>. bearfns:. ' TIias hi* 
Maj^*! V af.proT*^ fau«rj(&ri*ia beinz £zi^i for di^ir wiris^ : fc^n 
hnthhri'A/r^ th^ CffTincil u> diap^xii^ with iLe fin»E* oa Lcjal hizs- 
}fAUf]^, who do not coTiniv*: at their ocistiiiaze wires' w;iy». and 
hff'. KriUiu'tf to d^;liver them priaoners."'* 

Otj the rvl of JarjQarv a Dew commiseioa is snnted to 
I>avi/1 Graham, brother to ClaTerhooae : Bnice of Esirlshall ; 
Captain Stra/;harj ; Jame-^ Alexander, SheriJf-drpole of Diuxft- 
frie^ ;' the elde^iit Bailie for the time there : James JohnsSon 
of Weitt/.'rraw, SlierifT-^lepnte of Annandale ; Thomas lidder- 
dale of liile, Stewart<lepateof Eirkcndbright ; William Grahamu 
Comet to ClaverhoTwe ;' and on the 4tli, the Lords join in 
coTniuiAffion with these, Sir Patrick MaxweD of ^yringkell ; 
Rolxirt Lanric of Maxweltonn ; Thomas Eirkpatrick of Close- 
bnni ; JameH Johngtoun of Corehead ; James Fergosson of 
Craigdarrrx^h ; and M*Gie of Balmagie. This Court sat in the 
TollK^^tli of Dumfriea. Any three of these were entitled to 
rit for judging deHj>erate rebels in Dumfries, Eirkcndbright, 
Wigton, and Annandale ; and for other districts, commissions 
of a like nature were issued. About that time the jafl of 
DiinifricH was Hf> crowded with prisoners, that vaults in the 
castle were eniijloyod to confine them. Courts were held for 
several months, and many people tried, among whom the 
most remarkable was Alexander (Jordon of Eilstures in Gral- 
loway. lie was proved to have been seen near BothweU, 

' [Sec before, Colonel Graham's opinion of the neoeaai^ of this meMnre,p. 133. 
The long paper of detailed Reaaona for proposing such a Dieaanre, oommenoea with 
thU very sufficient one, ** That except husbands be liable for the fines, the fine was 
no punishment, because women, who were the great transgressors in this point, 
hare no estate out of which thej can pay the fines." The Reasons are printed in 
Wodrow.] 

' [James Alexander was a depute appointed by the Earl of Qoeensberryy as he- 
Htsble SiioriflT, and not by Government] 
' I Who therefore certainly was not killed at Dmmelog in 1679.] 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 335 

" mountod apoa a grey horse, witli pistols and sword, and a 
cap upon his head lined with grey, which was proved to be r 
slcol cap." He made great concessions to his judges, but was 
sent into Edinburgh with three others. 

25th Juno 1684. — Gabriel Hamilton, bauiBhed to America; 
John M'Chesnae, ditto; John Hunter, guilty, but made sub- 
mission, and vi&a banished to America; William Wilson, 
banished to America, 

The Commissioners recommend to Closeburn to take Helen 
Pagano (prisoner) her bond for living regularly, and tliat she 
shall not reset or converso with rebels, under such penalty as 
he 8hall think fit; and the said Helen being present, enacted 
herself, tliat hereafter she shall not be seen within the sheriff- 
dom of Nitbsdale, and that she shall not reset, or converse 
with rebels, under the penalty of five hundred merks. 

John Coupland, found guilty; the Commissioners, notwith- 
standing of the sentence of banishment, recommend to the 
laird of Earlshall to represent his case as favourably as pos- 
sible, and of his willingness to obey tlje King's laws and au- 
thority in time coming, and to take the oath of allegiance if 
required; and that to the Lord Treasurer (Queensberry), and 
Lord Drumlanrig; and in the mean time ordains tlie irons to 
be taken otl'him,' 

The shires of Ayr and Dumfries still continuing headstrong, 
ujmn the 22d of April 1G84, Colonel Buchaii, with five com- 
pauies of foot, and the Lord Ross's troop, with half of the 
troop of Guards, were ordered to Ayr ; and Colonel Graham 
was ordered U> post his own troop at Dumfries, or wherever 
he should think most convenient in that (luartcr, and to jiOBt 

I the two troops of dragoons in the garrisons of Kaitloch, Bal- 
lagau, Kenmure, Machrimoro, or Moniguff ; and that he should 
command all the forces in Ayrshire wliile there, and have 
power to quarter them in the sliire of Ayr or Renfrew, or any- 
where thereabouts, more convenient for the King's service. 
These garrisons were soon very instrumental in hunting the 
wild hitl-meu.who assembled at conventicles, and marched to 
: 



■ Wodrow Mw not theie iouT0»3K—Xolt tf Ur SliaTpi. 

\ Woitrow vnuld not w* an;- jaunutt*, or *nj tiling in t, junmal, thit did not 



336 MtaiORIALS OF THE 

and fro in arms, setting all Inw at defiance, and led by o 
Renwick, who bad lately become their chief. They lived in \ 
cavcB and lone houses, amid bogs and heaths, subsisting on 
the supplies afforded them by tlieir friends, and on the sbeep 
which they stole from the ungodly, Hucb was their insolence, 
that they set upon the King's troops, rescued prisoners, and I 
killed soldiera. In June or July, nine prisoners were ordered \ 
to he carried from Dumfries to Edinburgh by a party of 1 
twenty-eight soldiers. Their friends getting notice of it, r 
solved to rescue them, and for Ihat purpose chose a narrow I 
pass on the rood to Edinburgh, called Euterkin, wbere they i 
posted themselves. On the coming up of the party, who had , 
the prisoners tied upon horses, they attacked tbc Boliliers with 
a volley of shot, rescued seven of the prisoners, wounded se- 
veral of the soldiers, and killed one. Tlic soldiers going on 
to Edinburgh with the remaining prisoners, carried the f 
count of this insolence, and immediately orders were sent oat I 
to Nitbsdale, commanding all there above fifteen years of age 
to arm, and meet the gentlemen aud soldiers in their appointed 
places, that they might search the whole shire for the rescuerB 
of the prisoners. Some days after the rescue. Colonel Graham 
and a party of his men seized four whigs in a field, in the 
parish of Closeburn in Nithsdale, aud carried them first to 
Lanark, and then to Edinburgh. So apprehensive was Ciaver- 
house of a rescue, that he commanded his men to kill the 
prisoners should any such outrage be attempted. But they 
reached the city without molestation, and three of the fanatics 
were tried before the Court of Justiciary in Eilinburgh, and 
condemned to die. They denied Enterkin ; yet three of the 
soldiers positively swore that they had seen them there ; and 
these poor wretches were so obstinate tliat they would not call 
the Bothwell bridge insurrection a rebellion, nor make any 
concessions to save their lives.' They rather seemed to glory 

1 [The namoa of the three men who were of tlie party that fired from the «in- 
huacscle at Entertin upon the soldiers, killed one, wounded Beveral, and rcKnod 
eeveu prinonera, were, Thomaa Harkneas, Andrew Clark, and Samuel M'Eiv«n. 
In the dying ** Toalimonj," diahed np for them in the " Cloud of Witncssee," they 
do not pretend to deny Ihat tliey were at Enterkin. •* They wero all indicted," 
tuiYB llieir biographer in nuliiliir, " of the crimes of treason und rebellion, for being 
at the rcACiia of their dear bretliriin at EDlerkinc ; fnr i-cftiEinir (o own the King'H 



^^^^^^^H VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 337 

in the lioom Uioy wt-re abuut to suffer, and be cuiifiiletit of the 
miirtyr's crowii tbe moment their aonteuco was executed, 
Hauiiiol M'Kwou, one of them, was a very young man, and 
lifter EentencG, wrote a letter to a frieuil, which, from « sim- 
fjlicity of onthusiftsm, is exceedingly characteristic and affect- 
ing. 

At the execution of those three men, one John Nicol, a 
whig, lost all patience, and, by his exclamations, betrayed 
himev;lf. Having been present at their condemnation in the 
morning, and then going to see them hanged, after all was 
over he shouts out, — " A cow of Bashan lias pushed tliree men 
to deuth at one push," — and was immediately laid hold on. 
Before the Privy Council he behaved in the same strain ; nor 
would he there allow Ok kinc which pushed the Archbishop to 
death to be faulty. His own account of his examination is 
very curious. 

[According to his sanctifier in the Cloud of Witnesses, he him- 
»ell' thuit narrated the cause of his being apprehended : — " He 
having seen three of his dear Christian brethren condemned 
before the Justiciary, at ten in the forenoon, and going to the 
West Port to lake horse, was obliged to stay till his saddle 
was mended : Wtien he was ready to mount his horse, ho hears 
that the three men wore bronght to the place of exoention: 
At two afternoon he went thither, and seeing the barbarity of 
the enemies in murdering hie dear brethren, moved with a 
strong zeal against these murderers, cried out, in the style of 
the prophet Amos, ' A cow of Bashan has pushed threu men 
to death at one push, contrary to thoir own base laws, in an 
inhuman way."' But it was not for this seditions attempt to 
create a riot at a public execution, that tbe amhitiuus imitator 
of the prophet AmoH paid the forfeit of his life. Upon the 

aaih«rll7M Uw iMni) uru caublUml by the Uws,in ngard ha had unrj-^d CkriM'i 

Ittfrvyalitt, luiil broken ihe CoTBtuuil : and for not praying for him to tha leroia 

prweribad by tin GniDdl ; tor tbair maintkinlng tbe lawftilima of rltfiniin armt ; 

■nil, flaail)', Tor aithariii|i ui ihe eoviiutnlod work of rcfurtnalinn againil (li Kimg't 

^^m Ian." Tlia mliitUnu iMUiT aUribuKnl t« M-Eweii in Ihs ■■ ClnuJ .if WitnnwM," 

I^H dtmir* oolliiai: n( kII tliw, but na;*,— " ll *u lej diHin>, llintigli niml uiiwurlliy, 

^^^K 10 dia K niartjT, and I Uch tliu Lurd itho iiu gnuiM ma my ilwrv." ll ia not 

^^^1 MBlcd wlut Ilia ago wu ; tiul lie na aid DOoagh la ltr« Iitmt Out bick 'if N dike 

^^H npoii ■ dnKuon on duly, and to oblalii llie dnlb b* dediod.) 



338 KEMOHIAUS OF THE 

i8th of August (1684) before the Privy Council, " I i 
Bays the i>robationpr saiut, " interrogated by two in a i 
privately thus: ' Was you at Botliwell bridge?' "I am i 
liound to lie my own accuser.' ' I am not (said one of them 
to desire you ; but onli/ aay ujxm your honest word that j 
were not there.' ' I am not bound to satiefy you ; but pro 
^hat you have to say against me, and especially you, till I 
come before my accusers." ' Well, said he, I am one of the] 
Then, I answered, ' I ivas there.' ' How come you to rise in a 
against the King ?' ' Because he has brokea the Covenant 9 
the Lord my God.' ' Was the Prelate's death murder?' ' NaJ 
it was not murder,' ' Was Hackatoun'e death murder ?' 
ft was, indeed.' ' How dare you own the Covenant, seeing t 
King gave orders to buni it by the hand of the hangman ? 
' Yes, I dare own it ; for although ye shall escape the hand of 
men for eo doing, yet ye shall all pay for it, ere all be done, 
and to purpose,'" &c. And eo on through a very wildemeBS 
of the same insane discoursing, — the religion and polemics l 
of the Grassmarket gallows.' 

It was now neceseary for the Government to adopt 1 
most vigorous measurus for the safety of the country and t 
standing of the throne ; and the nature of tlie fearful cria 
with which they had to deal, may be gathered from th«j 
acts of the Privy Council at this time. On the 17th 1 
July 1684, ■' The Council being informed that the reb« 
have been seen passing through some parts of the shire of I 
Ayr, and that the heritors and inhabitants have not given ad- \ 

' [Let thoM wboae stomaclia are Btrong cnoagh for it, atady the whole of Ihto 
" Tostimony" in the Clond of WitnoBBes, p, 275-2B3. WoUrow himeelf furnialie» 
the following iDformatioD ss Co the principles and temper of such testiflerB. ■* Mr 
Andrew Tste," be Bsys, " minisler of C>rmuiii]ock, telU mc, tbat he was fully in. 
fanned and assured, that, in the Utc times, there was a deaiga formed aniong BOoie 
of the rigid and ii</i/fyjfij| Catturtmiaiit, la anaithali the indulged minislert in 
the abire of Ayr, at their honscEi, in one night, by diHerent parties ; tliat this de- 
sign was HO for gone into, that it was agreed lo in a meeting of these leiU peopU, 
wljere (one) Nidbet, father to Mrs Furiy, wife to Mr Ralph Fairly in Glasgow, wu 
present. He used to meet with Ihcm formerly ; but when he heard that proponl. 
Ail etry hair Mood, and he never more went to their mectingti."^ — AnaUela, ii. SS7. 
But who are those whom Wodrow bo i™nvoniontly disIinguisbeB as " wild peopli 
and Iho " rigid and bighflyiog CBnieroninns" I Why, liis own saints and inarlyrs 



1 



VISCOUNT or DUNDEE. 



339 



I 



vertiaemeiit, grant commission to the Sheriff-depute, ami Cai>- 
taiii John Iiiglis, or any of thera, to call before tlicm, and 
examine upon oath, all such pcrBons as can best give infor- 
mation of the heritors through whose lands the said rebels 
were seen to pas3, and send in an account to the Council." 
And, upon the Ist of August thereafter, they pass " An act 
anent the army," diepoging of tho protective forces as follows, 
npon a narrative the truth of which is incontrovertible : — 

" The Lords of his Majest/s Privy Council, considering that 
several des]>erato rebels do daily break out in arms, in multi- 
tudes, at their seditious field-conventicles,' and lay ambuscades 
for his Majesty's forces, and kill some of them, and rescue 
prisonerB in their custody, to the high contempt of the laws, 
and affront of liis Majcaty's government, — to prevent and sup- 

■ [Biihop Burnet, in his poilkunof libel, has tlie effroDtet^ la calJ the cxpm- 
■ioD " rendeivoua of rebellion ."—usod in Ihe rojal proclsmatianti, anil actn .J' 
Coundl, (o designate the uined Gcld-eiinvonlicle&, uid thai by Du figure of ipevch 
Iwl u ■ plain alMcOienl at tho actual bcl, — a "jUmriik " I A acvere eipoaun of 
Burnet'a tvty ductile ■enliments, aa to tlio uiflicieucj' of the cauae for Ijif Gavern- 
■Dcnl'i aUno and rigour, will be found in Dr ituwcll'i admirable " Hialory of the 
Chureh in Scotland," ii. pp. 335-327. " Tha Biihop of Salisbury," he «>/■, ■■ who 
eoDipoaed llio < Kinai7 of his Ow Tims' after the Rovohition, wan, il ia obnoOB, 
influenced by tho dcaira to justifj, in the ej'sa of liia roval palroaa, the o*eiibraw 
of the Episcopal Qmrcli in ScotlamI (o which ihcj bad been induced to conaent. 
With this view ke alttnd hia looe Data little, oa well in rererenoe to tlio character of 
the pralalei who had directed llie aRkin of that eMalliBlinient, m iclth ncpoel to tha 
Condiurtand nUToringaof the Preabyterianv" Dr ftouelliheB qaotM aa followa from 
Bunot'a " Vindicstloo of tlie Auilurii}', Conatitution, and Lawa at the Church aixl 
State of SooUand," priuled in 1(173. " How many of Uio miuiaten (Episcopal) haTa 
Iwen invadud ia their liouaea, their bauMn rifled, their good* carried away, then- 
MlTca cniellf beaten and wounded, and often made to swear lo abai 
tdiurclica, and Ilutl tliejr alHHild tint au mud) aa DutnplaiD of audi bad Duage to llioaa 
in aulliority. Their »i*ea al*o eicaped not llw furf of thoaa lueHrtJ ttalatt, bnt 
were beateu and wounded, •taae of them being acaroe nworered out of their labour 
in Ebild-birth. Believe me, tkut barbaniu imtrafa imf bm mek, lial m 
««( ionr bten apjirAtmdtd from htatiunt.'' Bumel alao Mverclj romiiKnita, In that 
work, upon " Ihe aatiibitU (VMvuIJajf of UcM murdmn, whom no aeanh whleli 
thoae in anthorilj b>*e cauaed make, ooold diaoorar, though Ilie robben carried 
with tham often afrwot dmt t//iirail«ri and eUnr y»odt, which uual hare been 
Morejed to aome adjaeent hoiiaea, but Could never be (cMwd out, aflir ao manjr re. 
ptBlnd facta of lliat iiatBre, fureelh apon llie charitable a MU^iciva which I t»rt ur* 
(• namt. What ma; not be expnited of tliin naturn from him who heaitatea lo call 
dw invading of Ihe Biahop [Sharp, mmrdrrtii by tlirm after this waa publiabed,) 
•ilh a plaiol, an atfmd itel, and will nut candomn It aa mah, pneipitani, and <rf 
evil cumple."— yiarart Waa all ttda" a flouriab" of Bamrl'i t] 



1 



340 MKMORUUS OF THE 

priitta all sucli rBbellions courses for tho future, and to redoc© 
tho country to tbeir duo obedipnce, and not to suffer any 
Hkullciug Vfigrant rogues to go up and down the country, to 
the disturbance of the pence thereof, and disquiet of the ' 
dom, have thought fit to dispose of his Majesty's forces bo 
they may be raost fit for service ; and thDrefore recommend 
General Dalyell to continue the foot wliere they are, 
furtljer, that he dispose the other forces us follows. 
his Majesty's squadron of guards, in and about Edinbur^i 
the second squad to go to Fife, and quarter as the Barl 
Balcarres shall order ; that Sir James Turner and his 
of dragoons attend near Glasgow ; that Meldmm and his tri 
of horse, and the Lord Charles Murray's troop of dragoons, 
to Tevioldale ; that the General's trooji of dragoons, and Caj 
tain Strachan'e, lie at garrisons in (Jallowaj and Nittisdale 
the Lord Dmmlanrig'B* at Dumfries; that two squadrons of 
the guards, Claverhousc's troop, the Lord Rose's troop, Captain 
Inglis' and Captain Cleland's troop of dragoons, be for Ay^ 
shire, or anj-Tslicre else tho coinmandiug officer shall thini 



' {QuoeBBberry'B clJest son. His father had opposed the joolli's own dcsira 
join the arroj', but the Dakc uf York intsrferei), and wmna to haTe carrieil tlwi 
point, by ibe followiDg lettor of remoDBtraDcc, which is written in a very kii)d|;^J 
gpirit, "London.April 10," (16831. " Had it not been for s letter I received 
daj, when 1 came from Windsor, from your son tho Lord Dmrnlanrig, I ahi 
not hare writlea to ;uu hy thU post ; for, imjeeil, whnt he Mys to ibc, of deairing 
to go into (he army, is bo reaaonable tliat I could not iiindcr mjiaclf from wriliDg to 
yoa in his fniour, that you would give him leave to gu, and tliut ho may not far* 
the worse for Iwing an elder brother ; nnd let DM the care you have of him be ■ 
prejudice to him. I hope I need use no oilier argauienta to second so reasonable 
a request as his is, for redlj' you ought lo let him go." 

Id another letter, dated November 10th, 1683, hia Royal IlighneSB thtts agai* 
mentions Queeniberry's sons, with freat kindnesa : ■> I luul, yesterday, yoon^ 
tho 2d, by which, and other lettcra 1 have had, I find there baa been some SeU- 
convcoticles, and other meetings, of late, amongst the disorderly people, and am of 
your mind, that, if everybody would beWir themselves, and be an (filigent as you. It 
would not be easy for thetn to meet. But 1 hope when you all arc at Edinboisb, 
vou »ill do your parls lo binder them. All Ihinga are very qniet here, and the 
bill is found against Algernon Sidney, and on the SIst of this month lie is lo be 
tried. As to Lord Mar's affair, by next I shall let you linnw what bis Majesty's 
pleasure is. They have done me right to you, that have let you know 1 am kind 
to your sons. I oasnre you they dtfservo lo bo onnlenanced, being both aa ftna 
young men as I have axa.-—Qaeriuberrg Payen. These were, prcbaUf^ t)i« 
second Duke of Queunsberry, and llio first Earl of Mareh.] 



i 

I 



J 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 341 

best for the good ol' the Govoniinent; that Claverhoiiso, and 
Lioutoiiant-Colonel Buchan, comTnanders of the five truops iu 
Ayrshire, coiitinuo, with power to them, or siny oi' them iii 
others' absence, to command and give necessary orders to 
them, and the whole forces, foot and horse, and dragoons, in 
the shires of Ayr and Clydesdale. Ami, tu the effect discovery 
may he made of the rebels in arms, and snch as have been 
present at field-conventicles, and upon whose lauds these con- 
venticles have been kept, or were seen and did aiijiear, may 
be known, the said Lords empower and commission Colonel 
Qraham of Claverhouse, and Lieutenant-Colonel Buchan, or 
any one of them, or in their absence such as they shall think 
fit to appoint (for whom thoy are to be answerable), to call 
for, and examine upon oath, all such persons as can give any 
information in the premises ; and for that effect t« use all 
legal diligence ; and ordain them to report an account of their 
procedure as boou ae possible."^' 

On the 6th September (1684), a new commission for hold- 
ing ofJusticiary Courts was emitted, in which Colonel Graham 
18 named as one of the Justiciars for Dumfries and Wigton, 
and the Stewartries of Annandale and Kirkcudbright, together 

■ [Wodrow'i oamineDt upon the above moat oecenary act, whieb ho priuls, n 
rery chaisderUtie : " I pee<l," he m}*, " mtko iu> ebtcrra upon thit acl. I sup- 
pono ibe umbuscadr epoken of bcro, and nlsewhere, wis tho atlnnj4 nwdo ■( Kntol^ 
kin Path, upon ■ pirl; of iim aoldiera eurjing io eomo prisoiiors to Edinburgh." 
Wo bare aeon what urt of an aUempt thai wu. He alao b}'b,— ■■ I nwd Kvricc 
aotico that tbcae rebeJa w mwii tpvlUr u uade about, were llr Kanwick'i followon, 
<rho wen obliged kl tiut canttiiUelti, and, I puy ita}', alateit at all titan, (or Ibcir 
own deToncs to earrf nmu ; and tuch at Ibom whoac wa/ homewanl fnm eonrvn- 
^lei lay together, are Ibe rebels now marching up and do*u Ihe country'," This 
doetriae, of the innocencj' of (Cuiog armed agiinU Iha Ooreniincnl, wu <niry con- 
•enieiit. Hr Sharpe baa the fallawiDit note, on the lubjocl or Ma* John Welcira 
aoaventiele imnailini : ** Welch 'a eacapu [rom ClaTcrhouas, and hi* other pumuero, 
vara very eitnuirdiiur)', though he n>do is bia conTcalictea aoeompanied b;' ■ 
nnmber of armed men, called Jfr W'tlak'i body-jaard, and liad all the fanatic 
eaunlr]'-wonio&, who unally acted aa aoouta In fire warning of the enemy's ap- 
proach, nuat alDCaraJj at bia dcTDtion. Ladioa, loo, of a better raalikm, wore sludi- 
«HU of his penoBal safety, while thoj' Ircquentod bia fli>ld>nit«tingii, and aomollniea 
maile their bnahanda pay dcariy for ■ a baarty raiaek of the ni-celneaa of the goapel 
(MeordlDg Io Peter Walkn-), which ihay |U in thoae daya.'"— iTirttoa'i VyiHorjr, 
FMOJ 



342 MEMOBIAI^ OF THE 

with ihe Marquis of Queensberry, Treasurer, aud Lord Dmn 
lacrig. On tlie 2d of October, tlie three latter eat down arf 
Dumfries, and remained thereabouts for nearly a montlvl 
They enforced the taking of the test with great success, ei-J^ 
cept in the case of Hugh Maxwell, laird of Dalswinton, win 
was Bent to the Tolbooth of Edinburgh to think better of it. 1 
After some days at Dumfriee, tho Judges went to Kirkcud- 
bright, and from thence to Wigtou, where they pursued the 
same methods. The test was offered to the men, and other , 
oaths to the women, and refusers were sent to tho jaUa afa 
Dumfries, there to await the return of the Judges. Aboutr] 
twenty-«ight were secured there. The people of Kithsc 
and Galloway, terrified by these severities, made an offer tol 
the Marquis of Queensberry, Colonel Graham, and Lord Dnitn-I 
lanrig, of twenty months' Cess, to be paid to the King in tho ' 
course of four years, stating in their addresses (October 9tb) 
their sense of the former rebellious conduct of that part of the 
country. The efforts of the Judges were productive of th» ■ 
most salutary consequences. 

On tho 28th of October, the whigs published what they calledJ 
their "Apologeticall Declaration or ^e(ai(on°dra^*n up by Ren- ^ 
wick,* breathing vengeance against their p^secutors, — " Such I 
as bloody Counsellors, the members of the Justiciary Couite^l 
Generals of forces, Adjutants, Captains, Lieutenants, all civil f 
or military powers who make it their work to imbrue theirj 
hands in our blood, or by obeying such commands, such a 
bloody militia men, malicious troopers, soldiers, and dragoons 
likewise, such gentlemen and commons, who, through wicked- I 
ness and ill-will, ride and run with the foresaid persons, to lay [ 
search _/W ns, or who deliver any of us into their hands, to the j 
spilling of our blood, hy enticing morally, or stirring up J 
enemies to the taking away of our lives, such as designedly 
and purposcdiy advise, counsel, and encourage them to pro- 
ceed against us, wickedly, wittingly, and willingly, such as 
viperous and malicious bishops, and curates, and all such sort 
of intelligeucera, who lay out themselves to the effusion of our 
blood, together with all such as, in obedience to the enemies 
their commands, at Ihe sight of us raise ihe hue aud cry aft^r 

> [The IflBt Scotch saint who was liangcd,) 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



343 



us; yea, and all such as compeariufi; betWe tlie a*lvi 
their courts, upon their demands delate us, and any who be- 
friend U9, to their and our extreme hazard and suffering. We 
say, all aud every one of such shall be reputed by us enemies 
o/Ctod, and the covenanted work of reformation, and punished 
aa suck, (u-cording to aar pojoer, and the degree of their offence ; 
chiedy, if they shall continue, after the puldication of this our 
Declaration, obstinately and habitually, with malice to pro- 
ceed against us, any of the foresaid ways; not at all exonering 
from preaeiU punishment, such as formerly have been chief 
ringleaders and obstinate oiTenders," Jko. 

" Now, let not any think, that (our God assisting ue) we 
will he 30 slack handed in time coming, to^M( matters in exe- 
cution, as heretofore we have been, seeing we are bound faith- 
fully and valiautly to maintain our covenants, and the cause 
of Christ," Ac' 

This Christian denunciation of vengeance thus royally con- 
cludes, — " Lot King Jesus roign, and all his enemies be scat- 
tered." And to shew that they could act as well as declare, 
they immediately proceed to murder two of the King's soldiers 
at Swine Abbey, in Linlithgowshire. Their names were Ken- 
noway and Stewart, and they were murdered on coming out 
of the house at Swine Abbey, iu the night.' Konnoway, we 

' IDeftUi. in tha tana at llio Imngmui, muat (utb boon jninning over Saint Red- 
wieli'ii Bhoulder, tn, in aome nnng hiding-lialo, li« penned this briuwIoDe chuicr.] 

* [Unqnntionjibly thext two gcnUemon of Ifae Tt>j»i guard were murdered iu the 
night tiioe, and tlwre im no muon wbaterer lo wppoM that tbcf ocr* coming out 
of the hoiueat the lliue. In » stating il Mr Sharpo had ru1ia*ed the iliaingcnunua 
narntiTe in Wodrow, and had not obMrrcd that Sir George Maelceniie, in hr* 
* Vindiulion," eiproaal]' atale* that II117 were murdered U lluir Mt. The Duke 
of llamiltan himaeir, b/ no tnoaoa ao lofal H ho ought (>> bare been, iboa aolicea 
ibe murder of thoai ^^oardiinicn, in a letter to QueciiBberr}', dated, Hamilton, IMth 
NaicRiber, lOHt ; ~ Poople hcrcahouts are mucli alarmed, aince the hearing uf that 
larrid munlfr ri( .Velar jfArf ; and they aay the fogltlvm [i>u(U<*a under anatenoi 
ofhgilatluD) have been acea mora publiel)', fn the remote placcHorthieahitv, ainea 
(he forces went out id it, than before, Wherever I heard of any, 1 aBut and made 
aearch for tha reaetlant, and lun several pHioners. Aa 1 wrolo to Genontl 
Dalyell, and now to tlie Qiancollor, without pUelug cavoraj garrlaona in llie moor- 
fah plaoea of the eonntry, it will be hard to ealeb or baolib theao rnguaa, or flnil 
<«t thnr naetlera I and for ny botam of Crawfurd, \t there Ui not otlwr houava In 
that partab more Ht, now that the one half of il la unTBuKeil, 1 am Isuoli tuialakwi. 
However, it, and all 1 have, ahall be ready at the King'a aarvioe."-- (/oomrffrry 
Hamilton loyalty had alwaya an 1/ In it. See before, )• Rl.] 




Ui 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



may be siiro, was a " most violeut persecntor ;" but \ 
hath iin account of Stewart. Tlieso outrages occasioned 1 
Lords of tlie Ptivy Council to pass au act, by which thoy 
dained any person who owneJ, or woidd not disotmt the trel 
sonable Ueclaratidn, upon oath, whether they had arms ( 
not, immediately to bo put to death ; this being alwayB dofti 
in the presence of two ufUnesscs, and the person or pere 
havhig commission from the Coimcil for that effect. 



1686. 
Charles the Second died on the 6tli of Fehruary 1685. 
a quarrel with Queensberry,' Claverhouse had ridden to Edio 
burgh, and from thence to Loudon, where ho was at the tin 
of the King's death. But he was in Edinburgh, at the Priv 
Council, when James was proclaimed, on the 10th of Fehruarj3 

This Monarch has been variously represented, as to cham 
ter, according to the passions of private men and tlie proj* 
dices of party. While the whigs, at the head of whom i 
Bishop Burnet, leave him not one single virtue to compeni 
for a world of vice, and even doscend to reprobate his personi 
appearance, by comparisons with the imperial goat of Caprce^ 
Tiberius, — the tories, led on by Sheffield Duke of Buckinghu 
attribute to hira several good qualities, which he certainly 
possessed, praise him in the social qualities of life, and, aide^fl 
by the antliority of Drydcn, Vandyke, and Lely, extol ihpM 
majesty of his face and mien. Burnet, who was a groat tatler m 
himself, wearied of his stories, and afBrmed his own case gene- 1 
ral. Buckingham, a patient listener, and, one should think, a 
much better judge of colloquial vivacity than the Bishop, i 
serts the very reverse. Burnet himself wTitea as he might have J 
spoken, — Sheffield as authors should write ; Burnet like the { 
companion of Duke Lauderdale, — Buckingham as the associ- 
ate of King Charles. In fact, it must have been through 
Lauderdale, Villiers Duke of Buckingham, and the Earl of 
Rochester, that Burnet had the domestic touches of his revolt- 
ing caricature, which reminds us of the pencil of " HelUdfa 
Breughel," while Sheflield painted from real life, witli all the 
sweetness of Lely, The King's tenderness of disposition is, in 
' [This qimn-i'l vtill be f<ian<l illimtnilcd in n aubscijiiciit P&rt.] 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEK. 



345 



some rpBpccts, well autheuti(;atcd. Ho tihed almndance of 
tears on the deaDi of hia brotlier, and tho Karl of Falmouth, 
when, in neither case, was tliere any occasion to dlHsemble ; 
aud his hchaviour towards the Duke of York, whom he loved 
hilt did not respect, wa8 uniformly fraternal and affectionate. 
With regard to the affair of Lord Stafford's trial, it ought al- 
ways to be remembered, that the unfortunate peer had caballed 
with Lord Shafteabury, whom Charles hated of all mankind ; 
and though he carried his conjugal infidelity great lengths, 
yet be treated his Queen with an outward sliow of reBj)ect. 
Neither would he hear of any steps to get rid of her, though 
monarchs affected by a matrimonial nausea arc apt to lay 
hold of very stale pretences for separation. His tenderness 
towards his concubines hath been commended by a late whig 
writer, otherwise far from favourable to him, with some sort 
of justice. Nell Gwyne, though a common woman before he 
adopted her, afforded him many hours of mirth by hor prodi- 
gious humour and vivacity. The Duchess of Portsmouth he 
might suppose he had debauched ; and she was worthy of his 
gratitude. From Barillon's account of the King's death, it 
api)car3 that she really felt an extreme tcndemcBs for her 
lover, about the well-being of whose soul she still continnod 
anxious when the body could be of no further service to hor. 
The whig historians of former times, who pursued Charles 
with their phillipics from the time he shewed (according to 
Kirhton) a dislike to tlie Lord's prayer, which methiiiks shouhl 
have pleased them, till he lent a dying ear to Fatlier Huddle- 
stone's, — triumph proudly, and give strange legends concern- 
ing his death. I pass by tho vague assertions, the poison, the 
common sewer, aud the lumps of fat, of Bishop Burnet. But 
the reader may consult, if he please, for a curious account of 
his decease, the " Scottish Worthies," a work now coudemnetl 
for the most [mrt to the perusal of Scotch dissenters, and the 
poring of old women.' 

King Charles the Second dii-d in the arms of the Duchesii 
of Portsmouth. King William expired pressing the hand of 
a Duti-h minion to his heart, — that cold and hard heart which 

< [A work in wliich ihr prapurtimi uf Irutli lo rKlsrhcmil in Iom Uiui Itinl tX Kul- 
■urf'* liratd to hii Hcli.) 



346 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



uo alfectiyus of relationslip or love could warm, and wbiol 
even on the bed of death, appeared unmoved by the horrors 41 
the valley of Glenooe. 

[End of the Fragment hy Mr Siiat-pe.] 



Hebe, with regret, we part from Mr Sharpe, the remaiudt 
of whose manuscripts on the subject, in our possessioQ, 
sist chiefly of extracts from Wodrow. How imperfect wt 
his materials, at this time, for a complete defence of Grahi 
of Clavorhouse, against the deeply engrained calmnnies 
that falsest of all false historians, is manifest i'rom the fact, 
that throughout the whole fragment wo have now submitted 
to our readers, he does not give us, or refer to, a single letl 
written by Claverhouse himself. That deficiency will be foui 
amply supplied in the next Part of these Memorials. Meat 
while, we may add the following supplement to Mr Sharpe'l 
notice of the death and character of Charles the Second, which 
will also cast some new lights upon the state of public affairs, 
about the time when Graham of Clavorhouse first emerges 
the scene. 



Although a king dies much after the fashion of other folk, 
except that it is his prerogative to have been poisoned, the 
curiosity is natural that leads one to look as closely as may 
be into a royal chamber of death. During the worst crisis 
that state of internal commotion to which the unenviable mi 
riment of this King was continually subjected, in the midst 
framing Indemnities and discussing Indulgences, in a whirl 
of hanging and hawking, hunting harts, herons, and heretics, 
foxes and fanatics, striving to sustain the Throne in England, 
and to swell the calendar of Saints in Scotland, it pli 
Providence to relieve the Monarch, who was more persecul 
than any of his subjects, by a stroke of apoplexy, on Mom 
the 2d of February, 1685, On the following day, AJexand( 
fourth Ear! of Murray, who had succeeded Laudenlale as 
cretary of State, thus writes to Qneensberry, now a Duke, aqj 
at the helm of Scottish affairs. 



m 

toh 

:■ 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 347 

" Whitehall, Ftbrvary 3, 1685. 

" My Dear Lord : — From ihe time Ihe fl_ving packet was dispatched 
jestcrd&jr, till eight o'clock this inoming, I never left the King, and 
ihftll give jonr Grace a short account, both of the applIcatioDS, and his 
condition all that limo. YeBtcrday about twelve o'clock he began lo 
recover his upeech a little, and from that time continued still on Iho 
mending hand, thoagh slowly. Every four hours he had a purge 
given him of Ut/crapikra, which had all the good effects luokcd for. 
He vomited four or Ave times ; but about one o'clock this morning, 
he hod three or four large ••••••, that so much relieved his 

head, and refreshed his spirits, that from that time he spoke well, and 
as sensible as ever. There was blistering plasters put to each of his 
legs and thighs, to every arm, his shoulders, and head. About five this 
mornitig tliey were taken off, and had done their operation extremely 
well, but put his Majesty to a great deal of pain in taking off the 
skin ; which rejoiced o« all extremely, that he found the pain so seu- 
sibly. Ho slept about two hours togellior, before that, very soundly 
and quietly; and about seven o'clock this morning he began to talk of 
the way he took his disease, very cheerfully, to the unspeakable joy of 
all present. The Doctors then declared he was past all hazard ; and 
this morning, about ten o'clock, they drew some blood off him, at the 
jugular veins. Blessed be God he recovers hourly, and is in a very 
good condition. God Almighty niake all his good subjects thankful 
for so great a deliverance. I confess 1 am not able to write more, 
being ill myself, and overworked, which I little minded in the tim''. 
This will oertaiuly alter measures ; hot I can say nothing yet of it. 
You may have your own thoughts, and communicate what you think 
fit to, my dear Lord, your Grace's most humble and most faithful 
■ervant, 

" MoRRAY." 

" Since writing this letter, the King has been again bled in the 
jugular veins, and with as good eJTeet as could be wishccl ; and, liesides, 
the blisters on bis bead and neck have run through his nightcap, and 
bis very pillow; so that the physicians declared lo ns this day in Coun- 
cil, that bis Majesty wni post all danger. There will be* a day of 
public thanksgiving for the King's rncorery here, but the day is not 
yet resolved upon. Ho soon ai* it i» your Grace shall be anjunintol, 
that the like may be in Scotland. We have not only reiuun In givu 
God thanks up-JU lliin day, but all the day* of our IIvuh. I was with 



348 MEMOBIALS OF THE 

the King after Council, anj »aw him very much better than Iw m 
the morning, itnil heard him a{>eak cheerfully." 

Tliifi too sangniuo expectation of a bappj result from mich 
de8i»crate dosing, bleeding, and blistering, was very soou ilie- 
appoinlcil, as the next letter fmm Lonl Murray to Qucensltorrr 
will show : — ^M 



" Whitehall, Fdii-uary C, 1685.^| 
" Mt Dk4R Lord: — I wrote nothing laat night by the ordinsry 
)ioHt, fearing, but with too gre«t cause, I shouUl have occasion tbis 
night by a flying packet, bis MajcBty atill growing worse and worse. 
My nfBiction overwhclnis me. I staid with blm from three in the after- 
noon yesterilny, till within a quarter of twelve o'clock th\s <lay that it 
pleased (iod to call him, and change his earthly diadem for a crown of 
eternal glory, to the unspeakable grief and aatonishmenl of all his good 
BubjoctB, and to none moro than my Borrowtul self. But let us rejoice 
that God has blessed us with so excellent a Prince as our gracious So- 
vereign ibat now is ; who was this aflcmoon proclaimed through the 
City of London, and at Whitehall gate, with the accustomed solemoities. 
You will have such commands as his Majesty thought fit on this occasion, 
trom Lord Lundin (whn is in waiting], by this packet, 
to write more to your Grace, what with grief, toil, and overworKng.'^ 

Just eighteen months before this sudden event, namely, ) 
Sunday morning, 17th July 1683, at the fearful crisis wli 
Essex had destroyed himaolf in prison, and Hussell was waiti 
to make Ms exit in a more dignified and constitutional n 
Bishop Burnet, let it never be forgotten, penned, under l 
influence of abject fear, the follow'ing sentences, to 1 
mitted by a friend to the Lord Privy Seal, and also to Charh 
the Second: — 

" One thing you may, as you think fit, tell the Kin;;, that, though | 
am too inconsiderable to think I can ever serve him while I a 
yet I hope I shall be able to do it to some purpoar after I an 
This i/ou undtrstand, and I will do it wilk zeal." 

" Do not come near me for some time, tbr I cannot bear any c 
pany ; only I go oft to my Laily Essex, itnd weep with her; and i 

' QuPciiBberr)' Pspcra. 



VISCOUNT OF DDNDEK. 



34E) 



dnral itie King's CAtriage to licr has been so grrat and u-orthi/, tbat it 
i^n never be too much admired ; and, I am sure, if ever I live to finiiih 
wbat you know I am about, it, and all the otber good thingt 1 oan tb'mk 
of, shall not want aU the Ughla I can give them. Adieu, mj friend, 
and keep this fa a witness agaiial me, if ever I fail in the performanre 

ofitr^ 

In disgraceful contrast to this emphatic promise, so mean 
tivcn Iiad it been fulfilled, stands what Burnet aotuall; wrott! 
of the lion dead, but dared not to publish in his own life- 
time: — 



" De had great vices, but Bcarce an^ virtues to cytrreet thera : ho 
had in him some vicee that were less hurtfol, which corrected his morti 
hurtful onee." 

" When he saw youn^ men of quaUty, who bad aometbiug more 
than ordinary in them, he dreiv them about him, and tet hiriuelf to 
corrupt them both in religion and morality." 

" He delivered himself up to a most enormous course of vic<\ with- 
out any restraint even from the consideration of the nearest relaliom." 

" His person and temper, his vices, as well as his fortunes, resembla 
the charai'ler that we hare given us of Tiberius so much, that it weru 
easy to draw the oompaHson between them. At Rome I saw one of 
the last Btatues mode for Tiberius, after he had lost his teeth. Itut, 
bating the alteration which that had made, it was so like King Charles, 
that Prince Uorghcse, and Signior Dominico, to whom it belonged, did 
agree with me in thinking that it looked like a statue made for him." 

" The King's body was indecently neglected. Some parts of his 
inwards, and some pica»s of the fat, were loft in the water in which 
they were washed, all of which were so carelessly looked after, that the 
watur being poured out at a scullery-hole that went to a drain, in the 
mouth of which a grat« lay, these nrere aeon lying on tlio grate 
nrnny days after." 

This diabolical di«h of heartless scandal, whcroof we have 
liere only afforded a few specimens, is garnished with moral 

' Dr RuwBll.in the iKunga qaotod fram hi* HiMorj', ip ■ prtvioiM Dote (p. SS9), 
■poaks of Burnet hkiing " compawil ilio Hiiiory of hi* Own Urn* aftar iba Roto- 
luliuD." But thai lellsr of bU prove* thai bo bad b«oa raacoetlog ll btfont lb* 
ilaatb of Cbariea iho Soomd ; and (urtbar, llial It wia hi* Inuallon it nhould Dot 
IK hi* ova lire. 8m Un whole laner, p. t«. <J tlii* vulumo. 



MEMORIALS OF THE 



> 






350 

reflections, including an expression of the BishoiVB amazement 
" to see witli what impudent strains of flattory addresses were 
penned during his life," — and his own high and holy sense of 
what " becomes an impartial writer of hislon/, and one who 
believes that he must give an account to God of what he 
writes, as well as of what he says and does." And all this is 
written by the man who, just eighteen months before the 
death of tlic monarch ho so savagely insults and rcWles, had 
crawled to liok his feet, and promised, with all the emphi 
of a cowardly spirit. t<i canonize his virtues t Now, do we 
despight the lordly fiat of his latest eulogist, who tells us 
Burnet was " emphatically an honest man," — that he was em- 
phatically a scandalous and mendacious chronicler ; and that, 
being now tried by the test he himself invoked, in the crucible, 
namely, of his own letter, he can never hold up his head as ■ 
historian again.' jM 

The character of Charles the Second, indefensible as tM 
some of the policy whereby he struggled to regain and keep 
bis throne, and also as regards the morals with which he 
fenced it against the impracticable and insupportable regimen 
of the Covenant, cannot afford to be unfairly deteriorated by 
historical calumny. It is Burnet, also, who has put a senti- 
ment in hia mouth which Charles never uttered, but which 
the most illustrious and loyal of modem historians, misled by 
the Bishop, has justly exclaimed against as being unworthy 
of a king.* The Duke of Hamilton, in his various foolish 
efforts to supplant the Lauderdale government, was suffered, 
upon severed occasions during the years 1678 and 1679, to 
plead what in reality was the cause of his own private inte- 
rests, and that of the cabal he led, in the presence of the King 
himself, upon the imposing basis of that ever lively subject, 
Scottish grievances. From this long continued and fitful 
storm, the star of Lauderdale finally emerged more fiery than 

' See, and comparo with tint iBtter, H'uOory of liis Owa Time, vol. ii, pp. -106-87. 
> Hume, not eaBity impofled upon, hftd allowed himself to be gulled by Burne^ 
in a calumny against Ihc King. Quoting the Bishop, he uys :—" II is rgi«r(arf,-.4 
(hat Charles, utter a fnll hearing of tlie debatm concerning Scotlish aflaira, add,-, fl 
' I perceive thai LauderdulB has been ^ilty of many bad things agaiiut titptojibJM 
of Seotland, but I cannot find tliat he haa acted any tiling ODntrary to my inTrrn>l 'jf 
-» sentiment unworthy of a sovereign ."^//(rtciry uf Engtanrl, v"' 



^1 n 



VISOOUKT UK DUNDEE. 351 

over, and well nigh coiisumed tlie patriot Duko with the 
fiercoDCSd of its flare-up, just t>cfore it flared out. Bunict is 
by way of afl'ording an authentic account of the last of these 
debates which tlie King endured iii his own presence, wherein 
the Duko of Hamilton arraigned the government of Lauder- 
dale, including the conduct and jiolicy of all men in Scotland 
holding high and lucrative offices: — 

" Duke Hamilton," saya Buraot, " and many others, were encou- 
raged to come np and accuse Duke Laudenlnle, The trutli was, the 
King found his fflcmory was failing him, and ao he resolved to tct him 
fall gCDtly, and bring all Scottish afTaira into the Duke of Monmouth's 
hands. ' The Scottish Lords were desired, not only by the King, but 
by the new ministers, to put the heads of their charge against Duko 
Laaderdalc in writing; and the King promiacd to hear lawyers on 
both sides, and that the Earia of liaBex and Halifax should bo present 
at the hearing. &Iackenzie waa sent for, being the King's Advocate, 
to defend the adminiatration ; and Lockhart and Cunningbam were to 
argue against it. The last of these had not indeed Lockbart's quickness, 
nor bis talent in speaking ; but he was a learned and judicious man, and 
bad the most universal and indued the most deserved reputation for inte- 
grity and i-irtne of any man, not only of his own profession, but of the 
whole nation. The lietuing came on as was promised ; and it was made 
out, beyond tlie pouil/ilUi/ of an anMwcr, that the granting commissions to 
any anny to live on free ijuartcrs in a quirt timf., was against the whole 
constitution, as well as the espresB laws of the kingdom, and that it was 
never done but in an enemy's country, or to tuppress a rebellion : they 
•bowed likewise how unjust and illegal all the other parte of bis admini- 
itratioD were. The Earls of Essex and Halifax tuld me,* every thing 
was made out fully ; Mackenzie having nothing to shelter himself in, bot 
that flourish in the act against field conventicles, in which they were 
called the rendezvous of rebellion ;^ from which be inferred that the 
country whcnj these luul Ixsen frcquont was in a state of rebellioD. * 

■ Tliii wu luA (ho truth ot it, u *e «h>ll preacntl; finil. Landerddo wm neTcr 
In highor fsToir with the King than dariog hi* wiowful cootcaia with UamiltoD 
ID KiTaud l«79. 

' Our " poar meUachal]! friend '* I 

• Ai>a xrre lli«; not K> I 

' Tbc lut haariag boron tlio Kiug, in wliich tbii Lord Advocala trlumpbuiUy 
derendod tho Vntj Council and Judga of SootUad, ocearrtd on the Hlh July Ml^. 
Tlia rhniiM wu murdDred on SUunUy Ills id of Msf preiiuui, tlio Mnu net 



SOZ MEMORIALS OF TUV. 

Kings naturally love to hear prerogative magnified ; yet on tkia ooes- 
aion tlie King had nothing to say in defence of ihf administralinn. But 
when May, the Master of the Privy Furw, a!<ked him, in his familiar 
way, what ho thought now of hie Lauderdale, he answered, lu May 
himself told me, that they had objected many damned things that ihey 
had done ogainat tkem, but there was nothing objected that was against 
Am nervicc. 8uch are the notions tliat many kings drink in, by which 
they set up an interest for thcmselvfit, in opposition to tlie interest ((fOie 
people.'" 

Now tlie truth ie, as we shall piesciitly prove, that these 
grand debates concluded, in 1G79, very much aft«r the fashion 
of the famous mulodrame of Timour the Tartar. There was 
a violent exploeion at the eud, anil the whole dramatis per- 
eofKt, of the Hamilton clique, were scattered amid a general 
conflagration. The King thoroughly understood the real ob- 
ject of this cabal, and estimated their patriotism at its fuU 
value. It does not follow, because Burnet says so, that 
Charles ever uttered any epigrammatic sentence on the sub- 
ject. But if he did, there cannot he a doubt, from the manner 
in which the affair ended, tliat he only uttered what was the 
true state of the case, vk., ' They have shown many things, in 
the govt-rnmcut of Scotland, that ran counter to their own 
objects, but they have shown nothing against the cfliciency 
and fidelity, of that administration, in the service of their 



having been attempled nuiny yean before. — [See Rothes's tetter on the subject 
tupra, p. Ses. The date of that lettor, ■• fidinburgh, 5lb May 1679," is cJiere 
■ccidentill}' Dtnitted.) CUverhonse was dcfealed at Dnimclog on Sundaj' ihe 1st 
of June 1679. The rebels attactied Glasgow next day, and wore defeated by Lord 
Roes and CteTerhousB. Even in reference to the atTair of Drumclog, Lord Row 
very sensibly ivrilcB to the CommanJer-in-cliief, " My Lord, if this be not m le- 
bellion, 1 know not what ia rebellion," 

' Burnet's Oim Time, n. 229. Robert Law, more honcet and righl-minded than 
either Bufnet or Wodrow, thns truly chronicles the incident, which will be found 
fully illustrated in our text :— " July Iflifl ; The Duke of Ljiuderdale and Duke 
Hamilton luiving bsd several heiirin)^ at tlie Council-board of X.andon, Lauder- 
dale prerailed in all debates, and cleared himself in all the particulars he woa 
ehorged with ; and tliere tho King declared, that, upon full hearing of what canld 
be said agunst tho Duko of lAuderdale, it appears, that in nil tilings he lias be- 
haved himself a» becomes him ; and the report goes, that nomelhing lo that effect 
will be printed at his Majesty's command."— ,Unnari<i^, p. I S3, Matculm Laing'a 
Inagnitoquent nnnecnse on the subject is all founded on Wodrow and Burnet. 



^^^^^^^M VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. S53 

^^Sovereign. This was perfectly trae. Nor was Clmrlce bo 
^H great a fool, as either to have eiitGrtaiiied, or proclaimed 
1^^ against himself, and to such bahblers as May and Burnet, the 
indefensible and ridiculuns sentiment, that he r<>garded his 
own personal interest as distinct from, and piiranioimt lo, the 
interests of his people. But wo must now Inrn to sorue very 
amusing and instructive letters, hitherto unpublished, from 
the Chancellor Kothcs to his dear fiieud Queensberry, which 
afford a graphic view behind the curtain uf the Htale, during 
the last years of tbe Lauderdale adjninistraliun. 

The Earl (afterwards Dnko) of Rothes, had si^t-n a deal of 
life. lie auil Lauderdale were fellow captives at tlie battle of 
Worcester ; and thus became state prisoners to Cromwell, 
whilo those great Dons of the Covenant, Argyle and Warris- 
ton, actually sat os peers in the Usurper's Parliament. Lau- 
derdale, who some how esoapeil that foni disgrace, was cooked 
into such a loyalist as suited the Restoration, by eleven years 
of duranc« in tbe Tower, which made him a wiser if it did not 
make him a better man. But Rothes ba<l the good fortune to 
obtain his liberty, after four years of confinement, through the 
interest with Cromwell, of that extraordinary lady, the Coun- 
tess of Dysart, who was al^erwards married to the other 
prisoner, Lauderdale, under the circnmstancos narrated by 
Ur Hliarpe. So fiothes rose first. He fliled all the great 
othces in Scotland from the date of the Restoration. lie was 
President of the Council, an Extraordinary Lord of Session, 
Lord High Comnjissinticr, Lord High Treasurer, General of 
the Forces, aud Lord High Chancellor. Of all these offices, 
except tbe last, be was deprived, when Lauderdale outbid 
hini in I6I37. The seals of Scotland, however, ho retuinod 
until his death in 1681 ; and ho had so far n'covcred his iu- 
ftaenr« as to l>e raised to the Dukedom in 16H0, al>out a twelve- 
month before his death. While somewhat obscured under the 
shadow cast U{>ou him by the fortunes of Laudurdale, Kothea 

I attached himself U) the Karl of Queeiis)>en7 (whom all seemed 
to regard as the coming man) with a degree of roufidcucc 
and affection, so earnestly displayed in his cnrreKpondencv, 
that one can hnrdlv doidit liiH siriceritv, althou^nh the attach- 
■ 



354 MEMORIALS OF THE 

inent may have been instigated in Bome measure by the dis- 
like he bore to Lauderdale, aud his disinclination to follow in 
the train of that domineering minister. The correspondence, 
however, between Rothes and Queensberry, was of long stand- 
ing. Before the rise of Lauderdale, or the death of Queens- 
berry's father, and in the zenith of his own power, the 
Chancellor writes as follows : — 

*' For my Lord Drumlanrig^ These : — 

** HoLTRooriHovsE, Octcher 26/A, 1665. 

*' My Lord : — Having this opportunity put in my hand, I will not 
omit presenting of my service to you ; and as I ever professed, so shall 
I be always ready to serve you. I have sent your Lordship an order 
enclosed, which I doubt not your care in, and shall add no more to your 
trouble, but that I am, my Lord, your bumble servant,'' 

" R0THE8." 

Drumlanrig had recently been appointed, in the lifetime of 
his father, heritable Sheriflf of Dumfriesshire, and the order 
enclosed affords very good evidence that the cancer of conven- 
ticles, afflicting the land and threatening the throne, had pro- 
voked and alarmed thc'government of Rothes no less than it 
did that of Lauderdale : — - 

" Whereas I am informed that Mr John Welch has been preaching, 
and keeping conventicles, contrary to the established laws of this king- 
dom, in the shires of Galloway, Roxburgh, and other places, and has 
rexjeived citations, from the Council and Commission, to come under 
trial, refuses to appear, but is lurking in some private place in the 
country ; these are therefore to desire you to make diligent search and 
enquiry in the places of your jurisdiction, and cause apprehend that 
seditious person or his resetters, which will be acceptable service to bis 
Majesty, and contribute much for the peace of this country ; and for 
your so doing this shall be your warrant. Given under my hand at 
Holyroodhouse, this twenty-fifth of October, 1665. 

" Rothes." 

Twelve years afterwards (Lauderdale in the ascendant), 
Itothes, still Chancellor, thus writes to the same, who by this 
time was Earl of Quoonsberry : — 



VISTiniNT OF DUNDEE. 



" For the Earl of Quefiuberrif, These : — 






ITik Auj/Mit, I67C. 



" Mt Lord : — I went to Edinburgh on Friday lost, of purpose to 
meet Sir Groorge Lockh&rt, * bnt he being oat of town, iiecosBitatcd my 
et&;? till Mondiiy ; at which tiino he and I did talk of all buaiiieia at 
great length, and with great freedom j but ho was unc^irtain as to his 
(vHolutloii for London, till he Bliould hear again from ihence, at which 
time lie waa to advertiiie me, and 1 Km to meet liim again at Edin- 
burgh. He in kind to me beyond evpression, and I peretiadc myself 1 
owe A share of it to the good eharacler you gate him of me on all ocea- 
HiouH ; for he told me very eerinuBly, with a grent deal of gravity, that 
he did asBure me you were very much my friend. Jndgc if I did not 
laugh within myaelf when he said to ; I having had, bo frrqiirntly, and 
so long, continual experience of yimr favour and kindncMs. But of thiD 
no more ; for we are over all Bach expressions. I bear nothing new, 
neither from above nor here. When I do, yon shall immediately have 
an account. My daughter is happily brought to bed upon Wednesday, 
(being long in pain but no h.iKard) of a brave lass ; so that now 1 am 
an old grandfathrr ; and now 1 am resolved to he mighli/ grave."* 

" [ humbly thank you for your kind letter, which you loft at Edin- 
burgh, but I am mightily troubled you are fallen from your resolution 
of doing me the honour of coming to Lesly ; and, if it may yet conaist 
with your own convcniency, I would gladly hare you do it ; and, upon 
my honour, you shall not meet with any disturbance, uiilcsa it be 
hawking; and excn that belooed recreation I shall forsake to oblige 



" I hod almost forgot to tell you, that my Lord Kincardine is ex- 
tremely troubled at his being turned out of the Coum-il of England ; 
and mncli more than be had lost both his place in Session and Treasury. 
He is nt a stand whether to go up or not. I hat'e sufficiently troubled 
you ; NO 1 shall say no more, but that 1 am, my dear Lord, your most 



mblc 






* Sr George Lochtiart of Csrawstli, the cclrtrBted Uw>cr, saJ aeniBwIial f*r- 
tiouB l>ein of Faealljp. Ha stood In oppuwtlon 10 Luutonlalo, and beouno frmi- 
iIfdi of III* CuuR of Sesrina id IGHA. Ha was b»tiAj aiMMinsteJ, on Sands; Urn 
31*1 of Muroli, ICHB, wlwii returning fmin llio furonono mftIeo, l)>e year at Ihe 
battle of Kinkoruikl*, b> (list murdaroiu M:oundnl t^hlHtj' nf Dairy. 

■ TtM Clisncollnr'a dsiighh-r wm mirried in Ifli 4, loClwt1fai,(>Mn>i •nnnf Jnha 
fourth Karl of Haddin|:liin, which lUridoin, coniwquitnily, detnlvnl by s tutMy 
■mn)t*inent, upon llir SMnnil tin at F,Mr\ Disries, lh« rlrlntl wa ■upon^ing thmngh 



356 



MEMORIAI-S OF THE 



In the montli of July 1677, Lauderdale and his redoubtable ' 
Duchess, and her two Talmash daughters, came to Scot- 
land. Her principal object was to marry those daughters to 
Scotch peers, a speculation in vhich she eveutuallj sncceeded. 
The bloated, blustering Duke, came to crush the oppiieitkm 
which, under the scrambling leadership of Duke Hamilton, 
was endeavouring to effect his downfall. How the Duchess 
demeaned herself upon that occasion, we have abeady seen 
from Mr Sharpc's lively sketch of her character and conduct. 
But the following letter from the Chancellor Rothes to 
Quecnsbcrry, affords details, very graphically given, of the 
regal progress of this rampant couple, which are not to be mei 
with elsewhere. Eotbcs was by no means violently opiwsed, 
like Hamilton, to Lauderdale's admini-stration ; but he was 
jealous of his power, and justly suspicious of his policy. 
Neither does he appear to have retained any strong feeling of 
gratitude towards her Grace, who obtains the credit of having, 
in former years, released his handsome person from the claws 
of Cromwell, by virtue of her own caterwauling with the 
hypocritical Independent. Sketches from nature, and the pen 
of Eothes, of such a charactijr as the Duchess of Lauderdale, 
must interest all who take any pleasure iu the perusal of his- 
torical memoirs, 

" for Ike Earl of Queenabeny, Tltete r — 

" My Dgar Lord : — I am now almost perfectly recovered from iBe 
most desperate colic thnt ever I had in oil my life, it haviug continued 
four days witli me, and I detained this bcnrer of purjKwe to give you an 
account of what passed yesterday ; wliich I shall do only in general, 
except aa to myself. 

" Argyle, Balcnrrea, and several otheni, met bim' lialf-way betwixt 
ibis and Loodon. My Lord Athole,^ Marshall, Aboyne, Sir John 

his tngthcr, to the moru andent Barldom of Bothm. Tlic hnppy event he recorda, 
certiualy did not cause the Chsncelkr to become " migbtj' gnve," but probably 
induced him to get mighty tipsy. 

' Mpaning LiiuderdaJe. 

•To whose elilest son, Iho Dnehesa deoired to iiuury her youngefl daughter, 

I I Iiady Cnthorine TiilnutBh. Tliia foil through, hut eventually tlie young lady was 

tnarriedto Loril Doune, Karl Murray's ehloflt aOQ i and after Ills death iu lG?fi, she 

married the Earl of Sulhorlnnd. 



J 



I 

i 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 357 

Ke!tb, in a hackney-coocli, tvitli a great many horsemen witb them, 
met liim tlireo or four fltngoB short. When Argylu cnnie, the Duke 
anil Duchess and her two ilapghters being in one coach, the; put out 
the youngt'Bt daughter, and took in my Lord Argyle. But wben my 
Lord Atbole came up, tboy did not remove the other, but suffered bim 
to remain in his hackney. Mark l/iat, eterki My Lord Hatton, with 
aevorul othcra, alaid at Alnwick till be came ; anil, tltey say, was re- 
ceived tiy the Duke with great civility, and a vast deal of kindneBft, 
and uo less from the DucheoB.' All the rest came straggling on ; but 
few or none were wanting, except Duke Hamilton, yourself, Roxburgh, 
Haddington, and Tweudale, and Cochrane, and DumfrJe.*, who in to 
flee hira this nfternoon ; and 1 suppose so uill my Lord Itoxburgb. 
Haddington came iu with bim from Lidingtouii.* All the gentry on 
this Bide the water met him otic where or other ; and all the Lords 
of Session, and whole Advocated •,* and bucIi as came io lo town on 
Saturday or Sunday, returned back to Lidingtoun, or met bim hy the 
way on Monday. And certainly they were the greatest number that 
has been seen together in this kingdom, upon such an occasion, for a 
v«ry long time. I did really, after a long debate with myself, resolve 
to have gone to Lidingtoun, but my sickness weakened me so extreme- 
ly, that, although I was upon the recovering band, yet I durst not 
adventure it. So I sent Major Bountinc, upon the .Monday morning, to 
tell the Duke, that if it had not been that I was so very ill, I wouhl 
bave waited oa him tlmt morning. His answer waa, — twice over, — 
* God forbid that the Chancellor of Scotland should bavn given lamsoK' 
the trouble of coming so far to a person that comes in private characUr, 
and not as the King's Commissioner.' This, I am very confident, was 
iu deriaiun ; fur 1 believe he understood that it was the common de- 
bates, in all cumpanieH, whclber I should or nut 7 So, upon his arrival 
here, I put ou my clothes, which bad not been an for several days be- 
toTv, and resolved, ao soon as be went up stairs, to follow htm, and 
give bim a short visit, aud bis Duchess onotber; but he prevented 
Be ; for so soon as over he came out of his coacli, be came straight (o 
my lodging ; which I apprehending, liad one waiting ; and no ran 
down, but tnot him rery near my gate, where 1 entreated him to give 



■ Tba Ducbco* and Ilatlon (LMidDnJale'a brother anil Iwir-pTauiinpiiTe), « 
at feud, and balml eacb other. 

■ LaudenUlc** own place of Lathinf^n in Eut Lolhikn, now liclonglag lo 
Uluil] rn rami))!, uniler the fnoclfiil nsmo of " Lennox Ixivo to BlsnljTc." 

Yel u|)an &t\t oocwliiii, Liudnrdaln 4i<l nal come down u mjal 
but mrrct}-u Duke uf Laiidi'nUli'. Prliw Miii>>l«rfur :^>llB(id. 



358 MEMORIAI^ OF THE 

himself no further trouble, but to return, but could not prevail ; so 
he, with the rest of the Lords came up. I desired him to walk, being 
near my gate ; but he said, he would not be guilty of the rudeness to 
take place of the Chancellor of Scotland. So when he came to my 
door he went up, but staid not a minute. I returned with him back, 
and waited upon his Duchess. So, after my compliment, which was 
wonderfully short, I told her I was sorry she had got so warm a day to 
come in. She answered it was the best day that ever she saw in all 
her life, since she had seen her Lord have so many friends to welcome 
him. I told her, she had seen that for many days together.^ And 
after a little discourse I took leave, and she would needs go with me to 
the outer door. So I stopt so soon as I came out of her own chamber, 
and begged her to go back. She said she would not. I told her it 
was not my due to expect it, nor I did not. She said, she thought it 
was. I said, that, though X believed she knew better than I, she be- 
hoved to excuse me to be very stubborn upon that head. So she went 
back, and the scene ended. 

'* There is no possibility of taking measures yet. For all parties are 
but contriving their several interests. Athole, Argyle, Hatton, are 
the favourites ; and the President' waiting till he see who is the 
greatest. The Advocate,^ take what course he will, must certainly 
off. I apprehend the Justice-Clerk will be Advocate, Collington 
Justice- Clerk, and Sir George Mackenzie advanced to the Bench. 
What occurs that I know, you shall ; but, I expect from your justice 
and undoubted friendship, nobody else^^-exen the little stories I write ; 
for it may do hurt, but can do no good. I will not end with the for- 
mality of a compliment, for I am, without all possibility of change, 
your servant, 

" R." 

** I pray you thank this bearer for staying."* 



^ The Duchess had made a very good hit. At this time there was by the way of 
a patriotic cabal, professing to be based upon the national feeling in Scotland, to 
destroy the credit of Lauderdale at Court, because of his alleged misgovemment of 
that country. The Duke came down to face the storm ; and lo ! what happens f 
Lords and Commons, Chancellor, Judges, College of Justice, and mob, go out to 
meet and worship him whom tlie King delighteth to honour ! 

* Sir James Dalrymple, 1st Viscount Stair. 

* Sir John Nisbet. 

* (^ueemberry Pa/>tfr8.-— Rothes had omitted to date this letter ; but the context 
pi-oves that it must have been wintten in the month of July, 1677. 



VISCOUNT 0¥ DUNDEE. 



359 



I 



A few ilays afterwarils, tLo CliimccHor ugaiu writes tu hi«i 
I illnstriouti friend, slightly noticiug mntters all lieariiig upon 
I the history of tLe great puliticul strugglo at tliat time rcuding 
■ tlio kiiigilrims ; — 

"20lhJul>/ I67J. 

" Mv DEAR Loud : — Since my last, little or nothing Las occurred, 

but every thing runs in tlie same channel, except that llie Duke o( 

Lauderdale has taken upon him to hear and to endeavour to adjant the 

[ ^fferences betwixt the Earl of Argyle and the Madeans; nod it in itp- 

[ prebended iny Lord of Argyle will have the belter of it, which yoa 

may be sure will not aatinfy my Lord of Athole," &c 

His next letter is more full of history ; and gives a better 
character of himself than it pleased Bishop Itiniiot to bestow 
upon him.' 

" ltJ(A Auguil 1G77. 
" Mif Di:*K Lord : — I iiiu now going to Fife, and nut knowing of a 
Bure oceaaion, I cun only any, thHt tberu i^ no alteration since niy last ; 
Quly the mutch Imtwixt Uie DucbeBa's daughter and my Lord Atholo'a 
•on is now concluded, which occasione several alleraliona.* Just now 
[ received yours, and am very [mnid that you approve of my carriage 
to this ticklish and unpnraUoled lime. Uut it put« mo mad to think 
that every body should not have exi>ccted that I would have undoubt- 
edly carried myself like an honest man. 1 follow the same metboda I 
laid down, and told you of; and I shall never alter, so much as in my 
thoughts, without acquainting you. It is a miracle to behold the 
■trange nlteratioas that every day produces ; but, in short, at one 
meeting Atlioli: carries it, and at the next Argyle. Since the mat«h 
was declared, the Duchess, and Athult^ owns their intentions to ruin 
HatloQ ; who carries with a great deal of calmnes-, but fixes his inte- 



p tsel ihkt ihs 



> Durnot'* clianurlor of Rotlm is brnUl. FoundiDK apon t 
QuuiKllor indnlgod too fmly at labia, (in wlikli lie «u bf d 
amoDg thu ilatismcii of his oun lU}', nr u compared wltli great >t 
bur ila^s,) KDi) hurt hi* hoaJlh tlicrvby. the Iliolinp JuiHBmi of hln, tlut Iw was 
■■*l*ayagllb«rdcli or drtinli)" and baviog thiu «»i)tganl«d lii>Tic«n,orpdil>lilm 
with not a slagU good qaallly. Tbv ohanotoriMio of Bum*!'* nialor)' u,~mali- 
oious calunui} fouadMl on a fow tsotttthato/ Wodniw'mtliitorjF,— fiDatlnlcalum- 

^^ sy fboDdod 00 maU7 lie*. Pur nehiU fntrnnt. 

^^L ■ Tlwrc ns much, hiiwrtri', u *t< iliall fliiil, bulKFcn llic ru|i nri-l ilic llji. 



360 MEMORIALS OF THE 

rest with all those of the nobility of his hrother's interest ; except the 
Marquis of DouglaH, Marshall, and Aboyne. I do undoubtedly be- 
lieve, that he is mightily in his brother's fisTonr, and has reason to 
conclude that he will stand by bun. Bat (as to the fullest extent of 
my shallow capacity) looking on for a tchile is the most rational me- 
thod to be followed. For when people are of so aguish a temper, it is 
fit to let thetn settU upon their drag, before they be meddled with. 
Whatever be the danger for myself, I find them taking all the direct 
and indirect ways to out me of my place. And truly I do not in the 
least doubt of their success. But if I should sacrifice my life, and my 
fortune, I will not alter my method in the least ; and if I perish, I 
perish ; but I shall fall in the high and plain wa}' of an honest man. 
Ilatton, I know, would do me all the kindness within the furthest ex- 
iowi of hiM ]K)wcr ; but should he in the least own it, it would signify 
ItttK' to mo, and would give the Duchess an infallible ground to render 
hiM bnithcr joalous of him. So that there might be an allowance of 
lltno (0 Moe what ho can work. But she infallibly intends to state her- 
$e\( u|)on litM ruin. Yet there is no question but, at the very same 
mlnulo Aw |)orcotvos her Ijord to stand for him, she will turn his friend, 
und almndon all others. So happy are those who engage with her ! 

** As to y«)ur ctmitng hero, I did conclude it not advisable ; for it 
^%\s\\\\ \\t^yp rendennl other people jealous ; and have proved no way 
•iM«HH*iip(l\\l U\ your interest. For any who pays them but common 
otviUlv, \\^n many sovoral constructions put upon it. Yet I would 
\^\\f^ MHV i\\\\\^ in tho world to speak with you but one hour; but know 
\\\\\ \\\\\\ to iHMitrivo it. What occurs from time to time you shall have 
il l\\ llt^w WalUw; but if you write anything particular, certainly 
HM t)\|MVM in tho Itest method. Company now crowds me; so my 
\\\^v Loi\)| mliou/* 

" R." 
** / iixmhl m»l jyoH uhU burn Mm, as I do tfours,''^ 

Tho ^lmlUH^llor» with nil his magnanimous asseverations, in 
thti lot tor ht> wishoil iHUumitted to the flames, was playing an 
ttuxiousi, rHiitii^iH gtuiu\ and keeping a steady eye upon his 
owu iutv^^tiritli, Notwithstanding the fanatical vagaries of his 
(\»mitosii, ho hiiusolf was certainly not a conventicler in dis- 
guiso, liko IVoiiivlt'Ut Dalrymple and his son ; and, indeed, as 

^ Uu(hi'« iiiU uol autici|k»tt», uot only that this injunction would be disregarded, 
but (U4( Uio IvUui' >^ould Ih> (^reserved ao long as to be printed, and for the first 
tuuo, ucHii.\ (wo huudivd .vc^rs aflor it was written. 



I 

N 



VISCOUNT OP DUNDEE. 361 

we ehall find, he booh became well eatiefied, that the Lauder- 
dale policy, atrouuously counselled by the Primate (ere long 
to pay the penalty with bia Wood), to BUppreBs the seditious 
and armed conventicles with the strongest hand of the law, 
and to grant no more indulgences to outed ministers (whom 
no indulgence could reclaim), was daily justified by the vio- 
lent and murderouB conduct of the fanatics in Scotland, At 
first, however, Bothcs seemed to stand in opposition to Lau- 
derdale ; hut so iuuocent was he, in reality, of opposiog him 
in his measures, that he became bia very good friend, in no 
long time, and contrived, eventually, to pick up a Dukedom in 
the scramble. Lauderdale's bitter opponent was Hamilton. 
How little of true patriotism there was in that opposition, will 
presently appear. From some of the squibs of the period, it 
would seem, that neither of these great statesmen obtained 
much credit with the vulgar, for disinterested motives, or 
high-minded principles, in their virulent contest. A doggerel 
of the day feigns a dialogue, in which Lauderdale is supposed 
thus to buUy Hamilton ; who returns him a Bolaud for his 
OUver : — 

" Lnuilcrdalt. Are you tho man thai dare withiUnd 
&Iy pleMiire, with n petty band 
Uf tipplcri that aurrouDd you ? 
Ill Ivt you know. 
That with onu blow, 
I'm able to conf^inDd you. 

" Haniilton. Your bliutcring cannot do tit wrong, 

Should you wuar out your huffUng tongue, 
So pray pruciwd nu Turther ; 

But Ict'l I'XpiCM 

The practirei 

By which we cheat each oAtr"' 

To return to the corroepondenco of Rothes with the " Deil 
of Drunilanrig," (who kept himself very snug the while in his 
old castle of Sanquhar, biding his lime,) again the Chancellor 
writes, as follows : — 




Laing;. Hut, Si 



ScrtlM, PwlT) »f Uw XVII. Cenlury ; id lienai. lUitwl by Mr 



362 MEMORIALS OF THE 

" JLe»/i<?, ith October, 1677. 

** Neither in my Lord Diik6» or Lady Duchessi talking of going 
awav ; nor am I turned qff^my place ycL 

^^ They have been very angry. The Marquis of Athole was noi to 
bK» hoix> this week ; and [they] sent an express for him ; and now they 
«my he will be here to-morrow. It is loodly talked" that be would 
briNik olf iliis match with his son ; and it is evident he puts off time, 
a* miH>h as he can, upon any frivolous pretence ; and all his friends 
rail a< i< ; ^ but 1 am confident he dare not ; for that minute he does, 
sh«^ will ettdi^avour to break him, and he has nothing else to stand by 
bul ht>r favoar* There has been a great talk of a further Indulgence to 
%mttHl ittinislens and no doubt there is a treaty entertained concerning 
il. Hut my l^^onl St Andrews' has spoken such free language to the 
t>akt\ and ;hi«J kim so home^ as neither you nor I could imagine he 
durst ; aud has wrought his end by it ; so as, yesterday, the Duke in 
th^ Coiumittee did publicly declare, upon his great oath, be would 
uover be for an Indulgence, and said he never had been. - But my 
Lord St Andrews did still so hector it, as (that) the President^ was 
put to make a spoev'h, and swore that he knew nothing of it, — whicb 
is a b<As^ Iky* i^c. 

Agrtiu^ im the 12th of October 1677, Rothes thus reports to 
Uui ousWrrv : 

^* At Council we did almost nothing : But the Duke of Lauderdale 
declaroil iM>sitively against the Indulgence, — that he never was, nor 
would bo for it, 

** I am not capable of questioning yoiur kindness ; nor you shall 
never have reason to doubt of mine : And, for all the Duke of Lauder- 
dale's height, and the threatenings I meet with, I am as fixed in my 
principles as ever. It is now criminal for any of the Lords, that uses 
to wait upon them, to eat with me, or visit me ; and they are publicly 
charged with it. But the other day, first my Lord Ross, and then my 

> That 18 to my, at the match which the Dachess was trying to effect, and had 
almost settled, between her youngest daughter and Athole's eldest son. 

' Archbishop Sliarpe. 

* Sir James Dalrymple of Suir, the first Viscount The venerable Primate was 
acting with conscientious firmness and spirit. He was thoroughly master of the 
merits of the case ; and knew well the extreme danger to the State, and the lives 
of statesmen, arising from such men as President Dalrymple harbouring and 
petting conventicle ruffians like prophet Peden, and otlie**' 



\ 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. ob3 

Ijord Wemyas, talked very pUiiily to the DucbesB, &ai told her, they 
would pay their ruapect nnJ duty to me, take it us alie pleased I And 
ever bidcc, ahc ia very calm as to that head." 

The astute Lauderdale liaviiig tuudc himself master of the 
situation in Scotland, by bis jtrosence in 1677, xmts on all his 
thunder in the following year, as Lord High ComniisBiouer to ■ 
tile Convention of E§tat«8, summoned to assemble in Edin- 
burgh ou the 26tli of June 1678. Meanwhile Hamilton and 
his tail of opposition nobles hurry to Court, unbidden and im- 
welcome, with their paper of grievances and accusations, 
■which uone of them would ever aign. It was diamond cut 
diamond ; and Landerdulo proved the hardest, Wliile thet/ 
wore pleading nonsense' before the King, he. wan packing the 
Convention in Scotland ; and at the same time keeping un eye 
nimn his absent enemy. The uld horse, Rotlies, was waiting 
in the race, along with the rising favourite Queeiisberry, both 
hanging back, while tbe pace seemed likely to break down 
Hamilton, and hurst Landcrdale. Claverbousc, at this time, 
was unentered. It is vastly amusing to find how Rothee, 
whose own great day bad been, epeculatos upon the clianccs, 
and waitfl and watches, in order, as ho phrases it, " to let ihcni 
settle upon their drag, before lliey be meddled with." Of date 
25th March 1678, ho thus writes to Queensberry, in reference 
to the rush of the opposition peers to mob the King io Ijou- 
don, in the absence of the royal bull-dog : — 



I 
I 



" To liave nobody ihi-re lo inform for hiiu, and counloract thoso con- 
siderablu [H^mons who will be informing againKt him, I judg<i will be 
very nnbocoming a wise mnn : And who hu shnll M'nd ia Ihu i|U(.-9lion? 
Argylo? Ilis father's mumury stinkK there lu hero; iieithcT dues 
tnther his [wnion, or wny of convune, recommend h!m. My Lord 
Murray is not fit for il ;' I need aay no more either of him, Liulith- 
gow, or Rota. Ilalton, I bvlicve, is not sucli n foul ; and if ho doea, 

■ Socli DODtRiM Ml, Itikl e>«T]' thbg wu qai«i siid mfa in SoolUnd ; 
wM Du approxiniMiaii lu ■ mbvllion ; ftoil that Landardat* was pramoting oDo, la 
wr*f< bis own lam. 

• Lord Uumf , liowovcr, «■■ Ilw one whom Laudwdale cnplojrd ) and be tut. 
cecdcd Uw Ullcr u SccroUrj dt SiMc ill 10)11 g and allMUlod the Kkg titl.bil dntli- 
iva loan bcfurv. 



364 MEMORIALS OF THE 

it will be easj U> treat him [as ?] one ridiculous. Now, my hsacy ia, thmt 
he will employ the Bishops ; by which means he lays all the stress npon 
them of what has been done : And if he shall move them to cry aloud 
to the King and Churchmen, — that, if what has been done be not conn- 
tenanced and prosecuted, they shall be ruined, — and then turn the 
cannon upon those who goes up, and allege this opportunity is only 
laid hold on to misrepresent and destroy the Duke of Lauderdale, and 
with the same breath to ruin the Church, — I warrant you, they -wiU 
not want argument, if any of them shall adventure upon so ticklish 
a head. For my part, as I have a soul to be saved, I know nothing of 
it ; and all this letter is an effect of a walk on the terraces,^ 

*'*' Tweeddale's taking the bond, I never doubted of. But what is his 
intention of leaving Scotland, I cannot imagine. To go to Court ? He 
will be as soon damned as venture upon it ;' and to stay at home I be- 
lieve he may without any body's being jealous. For as, few fears him 
as loves him,'' &c. 

Lauderdale's purpose, in this Convention, was to obtain a 
grant of money, necessary to enable Grovermnent to keep down, 
by force of arms, the frightful turbulence of the conventicles. 
The object was indeed dictated by the direst necessity ; and, 
in the hands of an honest statesman, could not have been 
gainsaid. But the disreputable and dissolute character, both 
of Lauderdale (a son of the Covenant) and his Duchess (a 
daughter of Satan), gave no little plausibility to the argument 
that the public money was about to pass into bad hands, and 
to serve the private purposes of tyrannical passion, and avari- 
cious dishonesty. Great excitement prevailed during the 
elections for Lauderdale's Convention, which of course that 
stormy petrel did his best to pack. Rothes shall tell the 
story: — 

" For the Earl of Queensberrt/j These : — 

« HoLTBOOD House, 8th June^ 1678. 

" My Dear Lord : — I received the honour of yours upon Thursday, 
wherein there was three inclosed in one cover ; and I am very glad 

1 After a hard drink, perhaps. 

* To Court he did venture, however ; and caught it from the King, as we shall 
presently find. 



I 



I VISCOnNT OP DUNDEE. 305 

that mine have come safe to yonr harnlB. By ntiat I observe every 
day, I find it evident, that those who bave been of late up at London, ' 
or are there, or were advisers of them to go, are jealous both of you and 
roe. 1 Buy DO more, but God knows if they have reason. I bare 
never spoke bat of public business, and that in general, lo my Lord 
Commissioner, nor any of them ; and that ju«t at the aamc rate ne 
have done ever since he came to Scotland ; except that, upon the 29th 
of Kfay, after dinner, he took me aside and told me he knew very well 
the great interest I hod in the abire of Fife, and therefore he behoved 
to use freedom with me at the old rate ; and bo desired that I would 
not suffer Sir William Bruce to be chosen one of the commiaiiiouerH for 
that shire ; for, if he were, it would be hurtful to Sir William, and ill 
taken from me ; for he assured mo the King knew very well, that Sir 
William had stood in opposilion to hia service, and that he was so sen- 
sible of it, that he wa.s resolved to take course with him ; and then he 
fell a railing at him. Whereupon, I gave advertisctnent to Sir Wil- 
liam ; and did advise him not lo endeavour his buing a commissioner ; 
whcreuj>on lie staid away, and did not so much as go there. At the 
Council table, before I went over the water, I was euquirvd at, aa 
others were, what day the election of Fife would bo. I told him, — 
when they pleased ; so they left it to myself, and I named the 13th. 
But when I went home, ray Sheriff- depute,* having got the letter, and 
the postscript requiring haste, ho officiously, without ever aci|Utunting 
me, appoints Tuesday last, being the 4th, to l>e the day ; an ncconot of 
which being sent to my Lord Commissioner, he, and the whole Council, 
presently began and reflected, how I had named the 13th, and had 
anticipated the time so long. There was such a noise and bustle, as 
those who was witnesses tells me they never saw the like, — that the 
King's Chancellor should abuse both his Commissioner and his Council 1 
One circumstance 1 must tell you, that, upon the S^tli of May, late in 
the evening, the laird of Lundy^ came to mo, aud told me, he wa4 



I Duke HninilloD wad III* hction. 

> Tho Duko of Rotbn 'u herilmblD ShorifT of Kifs. Thr inuDcdiale nubordinsl*, 
■(ilwlntcd bj- IbcH higli oftl(?i>]*, tru designci] 5licHir-ilr|,utp. TtipH bcritabi* 
juritdictioUB bfing nnw mct^rd in (ho Crnwn, Uh SotiTeign •lour mi itptfU 
SfaoriB^ to ut for bim, In tlis ruioui iliirca ; bihI thcup, Wftm, Km cmpospred, by 
the royal emiuulHlun, tn Rppoinl Ihoir own inunciUale Kibordiiutes, or rpprpiiiiila- 
Aim, who sre tarrned Uirir SthmUvS**. The Sheriff* (hoouclTm are t>i/vltt to 
tba Smtnign. 

' Sdba DniRimaiiil nt I.iini)>, wu tlie •eeonil (on nl Juidh, tlilnl Earl ut Parth, 
•od bamiov Earl of Melfon, k tills rwsnil]' nriml. IKi wifu, wlin *w ih* 
hrirta of Lnti'ly, or LaiKiin, In Fit*. *u ont* to lh« Dulia ot Undardah. 



3G6 



MUMORIAIS OF THE 



N 



commaniled to eodwTOur being elected to be 
shire of Fife, but civilly told me, that if he bad not ray alloirwiee be 
wotild rather choose to excuse himaelf, and begged my assisUDce. A« 
lo the firet, 1 told hiin, his quality and condition did very well aJknt 
biin, an well sa any in the shire, to endeavour bis being choira ; bat 
as to the Huronil, 1 Raid nothing. But when I found that my tibcriff- 
deput« had innocently brought me into a snare, which I knew wouki 
be presently represented lo the King, and that I bad several letters 
from London, SRSuring me that the King loads mc heavily with tbe 
conventicles in Fife, I judged it fit for me, to stop any fanher miarv- 
presentations of me, lo jpvo way, and cause choose Lundy one o( the 
commiHsiancrs with Sir Philip Anslruther. This I know will be very 
much gnimbied at, and reflected npon ; but I am now come not lo re- 
gard (bat much. And 1 must tell yon another passage which you tnay 
think strange. Tbe luird of Broomhall did endeavour that he himself, 
and a neighbour of his, might be chosen, without so much na ever 
telling me a word, or coming near me ; which I think I might justly 
have challenged from him as Earl of Rothes, though [ bad not been 
Chancellor. But 1 shall not judge it strange when I reflect on wluil 
tricks ho did first when all this bustle began in tbe last Senioo of 
Parlinment. 

" Now, ray dear Lord, I kuow you expect freedom from me ; and 
you are but just in so doing, for you shali have the very thoughts of 
my heart withoot reserve. It is more than evident the CommisNioner 
will carry in the Convention bis design of raising money ; and yoa 
know, nothing of any other afl'uir can be meddled with, but singly 
business for which it was culled. It was told tbe King, he would 
with opposition from my Lord Duke of Ilamillon and purty ; where- 
upon he, in a great passion, swore a great oath he sliould take snch a 
course with bin, as should make bim smart for it all the days of faia 
life. Now, conBidering this, I know not whether lo wish bim down, 
or that he may stay.' But I am resolved to advise neither. My own 
thoughts of the afi'air, after serious rejlecUon, is, that there is a neetsnty 
for raising of money, to maintain some force for eome time. For not 
only are we shamed and affronted by nuraerons and frequent conven- 
ticlea,' bat I really find there is a great disturbance, and disquiet, In 



you ^ 

m«e*M 
here- ^H 



' This part of the letter is ambigiuiusly worded, but rrom the conteiit il 

mllior eeem (nnd is certainly more likel>) that it was Lauderdale, ai 

Charles II., wlio sworo the gr^al oath, and tlireatentfd IlamilloD. Tliat Du 

at the lime in London, atruggling to undermine LnuJerdalo with the Kiug. 

I Of which his own Connlcss a-as a Rreat promoter. 






VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 367 

tlie hamaurs of the people ; and they are paaaessed witti soiIi^dub 
principles against the King sml hia Government, which in jnost de- 
UsIabU to ail honest mp.n ; nnit I jtidge it most rationnl, to give of 
our money, although those receive the benefit, and tiisle the sweet of 
it, who ore not our friends, mlher than have the rebet/ioua '49 re-acted 
over again,' and we and our posterity to live in slavery. 1 am very 
glad you intend to haste here. I beseech you do, for I will undoobted- 
ly expect you either on Friday or Saturday next. My Lord St. An- 
drewH tallc« of you with all the kindness and tenderness iuinginable, 
and I am very confident ix real, and has friendship to yon. )''or my 
pnrt, 1 shall separate jrom my life sooner than do any thing unworthy 
of the great testimonies of friendship I have received from you ; for I 
am, with all the zeal imaginable, nnaltcrable in my IneadHhip to 
you. 

" Yesterday, in Exchequer, there was a paper read, signed by the 
King, discharging Sir William Druce* to be Surveyor. So, there is 
£300 be year gone. I wish they may hold there as to him. I am very 
sure the Commissioner, being in great privacy with one be trusts very 
much [said?] that now the King had made him hisCommias)oner,itHboDld 
be seen that he should endeavour to carry with cahnness and modera- 
tion ; and that no person should do him the favour to visit him but they 
should meet with a kiud and civil reception. And, speaking of you, 
he said, twice over,—' God, O God ! I hftvo a family friendship for 
his ; and 1 hojio my Lord will visit me uow, although he would not do 
so much when I was only Duke uf Lauderdnlc.'' The DucheRs ap[)eBrs 
mightily to follow the same method, and snya, it is not huj^ing and 
ranting that does business ; and crirt when she bpeaks of my Lonl's infir- 
mity of falling into passion, — when, God knows, she is as guilty her- 
self. She said to me, on the '29th of May, at table, quietly in my ear ; 
' Lord 1 my Lord Chancellor, is it not possible that wo may all live 
in quiel, and be free of all this trouble?' I answered her immediKlely 
in thu same method : ' Madam, noon alive can du it so well as you ; 
and I am very sure it is yuur interest, and you will never repent it.' 
Whereupon she said, ' God knows it had not been her fault, nor never 
should be,' — and then gave two or three tore $igha, and then s[M)ko not 
K word for n ({uarter of an hour. 

■ TliB ymr in which Chartn tlio Pint *aa mnrdered b; CnNnwcll. 
• Sir Wlliliiai Bruce of Kinniai. 

■ Ths ' funily frirailabip" •■* prubcblj' thii, that Landerdslo, ■ political hjpo- 
oriU^ of til* 0>T«n*nl oT 1GS7, «u, si tlukl iSine, in clow eonredmcv vltb llie 
ChoDOEllur'i fatlnir, simtlior hjpncriti- of Ilis miiib hUiiiji. Diitli (iruTcil lliciiiHlvn 



368 MEMORIAI^S OF THE 

" Now, my Lord, I knowl need not desire you to keep what I writ« 
to you, to yourself; for I do not doubt it, and therefore shall add no 
more but that I am yours, 

Lauderdale's convention assembled accordingly, on the 26th 
of June 1678, wherein, as Eothes anticipated, he carried all 
before him. Had his measures for suppressing murderous 
sedition, and actual rebellion, perpetrated under the blasphe- 
mous assumption of a divine mission, been all that could be 
said against the domineering Duke's government of Scotland 
at this crisis, his name would have been no blot upon the 
annals of his country. But in his person was exhibited the 
rankest specimen of that noxious but not unnatural growth, 
the most zealous and intolerant of covenanters developed into 
the most bloated and tyrannical of royalists. The Covenant 
alone could have furnished such an example as Lauderdale ; 
and true to its own nature, it furnished others of the same 
kind, though not equally successful. But the purpose of this 
Convention, as declared in the royal proclamation, was founded 
upon facts unquestionable, and the most obvious principles of 
common sense : " The great kindness," it said, " we bear to 
that our ancient kingdom, hath at all times inclined us to be 
very watchful over all its concerns : and considering^that all 
Kings and States, do, at present, carefully secure themselves 
and their people, by providing against all such foreign inva- 
sions, and intestine commotions, as may make them a prey to 
their enemies, and that it is not fit that our kingdom should 
only, of all others, remain \Ndthout defence, especially at a 
time wherein the execrable Jield-convenf teles, — so justly termed 
in our laws ' the rendezvouses of rebellion,' — do still grow in 
their numbers and insolence, — against all which our present 
forces cannot in reason be thought a suitable security, — There- 
fore, and that we may be the better enabled to raise some 
more forces, for securing that our kingdom against all foreign 
invasions and intestine commotions, and to maintain them in 
the most equal and regular way, and let the world see the 

* Queensberry Papers. 



4 

\ 



I 



VISCODNT OF DDNDEE. 369 

unanimous affections of our people to us, We have tliought 
fit to call a Convention of the Estates of that our ancient 
kingdom, to meet at Edinhurgh upon tho 26th da; of June 
next to come," Ac' 

In thia OonvGutiou Lauderdale was deservedly sucoeesful. 
Besides making a convert of his rival the Chancellor, in Edin- 
burgh, ho was hailed ut head quarters aa the true panacea for 
the troubles and the turbulence of Scotland. It is amusing 
to see how completely he had gained over Kothea, whose re- 
pugnance to him, and suspicion of his measures, appear to 
fasTG been as fluctuating as the colics with which he was so 
often tonneutcd. Upon the 27ih of July 1678, he writes to 
Queeusberry as follows ; — 

" My Dear Lord ; — The very same ilay you went from this 
plarai, I waa restored to my perfect health, my colic having luft me ; 
so now I am very well, if not better than I have beua (bis great while, 
at your service. Tbe CommiaBioner being to come from Lethington 
on Tuesday, I went there in the morning, auil returned to this placv 
with hira at night. On Monilay nlglu be had received an express 
paeket from Mr Secretary Williainiion, in his Majesty's name, with a 
particular lott«r frvm the King, all witli his own bund, approving all 
bis procadnro at a very high rate, and returning btin thanks nuitable ; 
and raost pnrlieulorly telling him, tbat he liaa been inrormed, and is 
convinced, of bis cnim and efiiial carriage, notwitUHtanding of tbe great 
and insupportable temptations be had to tbe contrary, and desires him 
not in tbe least to doubt his slcadinoss and fixed friendship to biro, 
nor to fear his cnemien ; and gives him a kind invitation up. * So much 
as to bis letter from the King. 

" In his otberi, from my Lord Maynard and Laiidy, all which I 
road, they are mttcb higher to bis commeiidatinn, and enlarge very 
mtich upon tbe goneral applause be baa ihere from all persons the King 
has any value br ; particularly the Duke, Cbaaodlor, and TrtMsurer ; 

■ Rajal pTDclamadaD, dated at WhiloluUI, 33d Hay IflTS. 

■ Tht* coinpl'toly malnulInK Humcl. See twfore, p. Ul. and noit. U ilu- 
LiaderdalB (iunUy (■■(>«» hata been aa wall prHerred m tbe QaBeiuban7, tUi 
aategtaph tdHr oT a[^>ti>batkn and coapHmmt, frani Cbarin the Sf mad M the 
Dalle of I^adardalf, ooitbt U be diieevervil Id iha arebivea of thai aoUe houae. 
tl wnald ba of ■am* impoflaiM* to the obanoWr ciT Ilu gnU million at the Reela> 
ralion, and very intorcntint in a hiitoriati point of rtvw, 

■24 



370 ICEMORIAI^ OF THE 

from all which I believe he has letters of compliment, with kind invi- 
tation up, which he receives with a great deal of joy ; and no doubt he 
has reason, and does intend for the Court very suddenly, although the 
day is not as yet prefixed. He enquired at me, in Lethington, very 
kindly for you ; and, when I told him you had staid two days in town 
(after you was sent for by your Lady) to see if my health would have 
allowed you to have waited on them, and he would have gone along, 
but you was now out of town, but would wait upon him before he went, 
ho said, you should have been very welcome alone. Then my Lady 
Duchess said to me before him, — * Fie upon you, that you should have 
occasioned our losing the favour of a visit from my Lord Queensberry.' 
Then my Lord begun and said a great deal of the intimacy had been 
betwixt your families. His tongue never ceases, when I am with him 
alone, reflecting uj>on Duke Hamilton's prudentials in the management 
of his affairs ; and now he says, that he knows he intends for London, 
and ^ by his faith he shall give him one bout there, for he shall be with 
him, and tell the truth ; and he is very confident the King will believe 
him as well as Duke Hamilton, or the Earl of Perth,' — who he says 
is to follow the Duke. 

" This new match, betwixt Mr Maitland and my Lord Argyle'a 
daughter, fixes all interest of state, as is supposed. But J can assure 
you the Churchmen are not pleased with it. I have spoke with mv 
Lord Saint Andrews concerning you and your little affair, but your 
writer not having brought me the heads of what was to be in ^-our 
signature, I could not speak to my Lord Hat ton ; and he is just now 
going to his son's marriage, * and does not return till Wednesday, at 
which time I suppose the Commissioner will be just a-going. I have 
gone on purpose this morning to my Lord St. Andrews concerning [it], 
who entreats you earnestly to haste into this town (and I must also 
beg it), and does undoubtedly expect you on Wednesday night at 
farthest ; for my Lord Commissioner is positively resolved to go on 
Friday. The bearer will tell you in what haste I am, the Commis- 
sioner being to dine here ; so that I shall say no more, but that I am, 
without all possibility of change, yours, 

" R." 

* Mr Maitiand was the eldest son of Lord Hatton, and eventually became fourth 
Earl of Lauderdale. He married Lady Anne Campbell, daughter of Archibald, 
ninth Earl of Argylo. According to the Peerage, there was no issue of this mar- 
riage. There had been a son, however, who was christened on Saturday, 3d of 
May 1679, the day of Archbishop Sharp's murder ; for Rothes was returning from 
that christening to Fife when he heard of the murder. See before, p. 261, his 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



371 



I 



I 



About a mouth after the Commissioner's departure from 
the scene of hie triumph, the communicative Chancellor again 
addresses the coming man, in a letter replete with curious 
information: — 

"8eptemher2. 1678. 
" Mv Dgab Lord: — If I bad any thing worthy ytiur tronble 1 
had written long ere now, but I knew nothing worthy of iin expri^as ; 
and DOW I have ho much to say I know not wberc to begin ; but I 
shall with answering yours I received this day ; only first give tou an 
account of what came by the last packet. 

" And you nrnst observe an a great change, forsootb, that all letters 
are drst directed to me, as Chancellor, and the rest of the Lords of 
Privy Council after; which was always the old style till niy Lord 
TweedJalo and Sir Roliert Murray came in |)lay. ' There is one letter 
to the Treasury, and another to the l^xahequer, commanding the Earl 
of Murray to be adtnilted a member of liotb ; but there being no quo- 
rum of the Treasury here, I am forced to »und for the Earls of Argyle 
and Dundonald to haste in, whieh I nuppoac will be about the 24th or 
&6tli instant, at which time I believe we shall have another Council 
day ; at whicb time I do expect we shall have down the commissions 
for all the officers. 

■' There is also an order come for the reduciDg of threescore of the 
Marquis of Athole's troop, so that now it will consist only of a hun- 
dred. It is to be done on Monday next ; and atthough there be no 
Curaraiflsioner of the Treasury here. Sir William Sharp and I have 
made a shift for money to i>ay (hem off, that no time may be lost. The 
King has appointcil two companies of Hlgblaudcrs, each consinting of 
a hundn>l and fifty, to be commanded by Lawers and Colonel Innes, 
as captains, with a hundred commanded men, out of the Karl of Lin- 
lithgow's regiment, tJi keep garrison chiefly in Inverlocltie, and in other 
places in the Highlands, Fur the (leace, settlement, and ijuieting of 
them. Vou may be sure my Lord Argylu's affair concerni[ig Mull is 
the great cause of this. The Bishop of (iulloway is to be sworn a 
member of the Privy Council so soon an he comes from the north, nod 
he is expected to-morrow. Tlit^se are public news. Now to yourself 
all the rest. 

kiter to (jDCpnaberT)' on Um oocaskm. But on ua* of Ihst marrisge had (urvivcd , 
u Rlchin) MutUad, borth Eari of I^ndordals, ms ■aeoaoded b> hi* brother. 

Tin admiBlitmtioB of Sootluid wm >n ihoir hkodi for ■ feir jcars. until 
Tw**ddale (|aiimlled with LandinUlc in }e'i. 



372 MEMORIALS OF THE 

" You know the Earl of Tweeddalo met my Lord CommisBioner at 
Nothcrby, and there pressed, with violence, that he might accompany 
the Dake of Lauderdale to Court, but had the honour of a positive re- 
fusal, being told by the Duke himself that he should willingly hear 
what he had to say at London, but that he was so much crowded al- 
ready on the road, as that ho desired him to go by himself, which ac-. 
cordingly he did.^ And after he was some days at Windsor, my Lord 
Chamberlain being sick, and not able to come abroad, he prevailed 
with him to appoint the Usher to give him the Sword to carry before 
the King ; at which his Majesty appeared surprised, and sent and chid 
ray Lord Chamberlain immediately after. Yet within a day or two 
my Lord Twceddale desired to speak with the King ; and being ad- 
mitted in a morning, after a long preface he told the King, that he was 
convinced his Majesty was angry with him, and used great vows and 
oaths to convince him that he had been, and would be ready to serve 
him in his own way, as he should command, in all things whatsoever, 
and had the positive expression^ that he should give an absolute and 
entire obedience to the Duke of Lauderdale in all things ; and cried, 
and then clapt down on his knees, and begged mercy for all that he 
had done which had given his Majesty any cause of offence. The 
King said, * Rise my Lord : I have received fair promises, many times, 
from your Lordship in particular, and from others joined with you of 
this party ; but, by God, I will be used so no more, but will always 
use you according as I find your endeavours to serve me.' Then he 
magnified himself, and his behaviour in the Convention ; but the King 
interrupted him, and with great derision told him, — * I know you did 
not, but the contrary;' so, twice or thrice after pleading pity, the King 
left him.' So immediately Tweeddalo coming away, encountered the 
Duke of Lauderdale, and began to expostulate, and tell him that he 

* Tweeddalo'8 eldest son was married to Duke Lauderdale's only daughter in 
lCr>G, under the King's especial patronage. See before, p. 248. But be bad quar- 
relled with tbo minion, and displeased the King, although now cringing for favour. 
See before, p. 864, and note, Tweeddalo was a verj loose fish in politics, but emi- 
nently successful in the end. 

' Wbcn James Gutlirie, tbo covenanting minister, was condemned to death for 
his numerous and most insolent treasons, Twecddale, taking a factious position, 
stood alone in opposing the execution of one of tbe most truculent rebels and blood- 
tbirsty fanatics that ever met with Uie fate he was so fond of decreeing for others. 
See before, p. 21(y. Twccnldale was put under restraint in tbe Castle of Edinburgh 
at the time, not for bis minority of one, but because he had accompanied bis oppo- 
sition with some insinuations as to the King's personal motives in leaving Guthrie 
to the fate ho so well deserved. The Earl, however, was soon enlarged, and very 
leniently dealt with. 



VISCOUNT OK DUNDEE. 373 

tvM minrepniBented tu tlie King ; to wlilcli he answered, that he bad 
told tlie King every man's trac carriage, and if lie lind not done so, ha 
had been unworthy the tnmt he bore; but-he had done it justly, with- 
out rcspLTt of pcnona. 

" My dear Lord, you may ruraorober when ne parted, I told you 
that I would write a letter to the Duke of Lauderdale, declaring my 
readiness ta serve the King, and in his own way ; but Ixiing troubled 
with the leiatick for noriie days, did delay it. So I reojiwed a letter 
from the Duke of Lauderdale, the double of which ie heru innertcd ns 
follows, with my answer tbiireto. lly mine, I sup])08e you will per- 
ceive I am very full ns to my duty to thu King, and I thitjk I need 
need not care though it were printed.' ISut as to the letters, as ful- 



[Lauderdcde to JlolAet, eHc/ooeJ.] 

" //<ii«, 'J8M A<iffutt Iti78. 

" Mv Lonn: — 1 caina lo Whitehall on Saturday, three houm 
nfler hia Majusly went hack to Windsor, wliere I think he will slay 
till he return tu the I'arliameut. Sunday morning I waited on him at 
Windsor, Iwfore ho came from the chapel. And after I had hwn with 
him at the committee fur foreign affairs, I gave him a short account of his 
atfairs in Scotland, especially of the late Convention ; aud according to 
my duty to truth, and to what I did proraiae your Lordship, I told liim 
how well j'uu had served in the Convention, and in your eminent stniion 
bad contributed as much to the happy succens of the Convention as 
man could do. lie was very well pleased with it, and commanded mc 
to tell you so. Then I lold him how confident I was of your reality 
in aorring him thoronghly, and in his own way, not only against the 
nbellious field convcntides, and for porging the Church of schism, but 
ftlso against all factions and parlies.* This I hod warrant from your 

■ It (TM doUiaoil to In [inDtod in (hi* rolumc, fur (tie fin>t lim*, aftor (ho lapis 
of aBU\j Iwo twiitariua. 

■ It ia amaiiiig ta cniitrapt this witli th<> H«v. Itubsri Ualllie'* nxvird of Luutar- 
dale, sa a CoTciiantcr. Vrilinj; to Warrulou from L<in>lnn,in 1613, dorlag llu 
agitaUoa of Iho Sulamn Lsaipis antl Covi-uaiil, Bsillia wj's i — " Tliprv cauDof br 
Ihre« Dioru giadoiu >di1 abia man tiiau Mr Hrodt-rvun, Hr Gillaqritt, and Mr Ru- 
tbarfunl ; aui] 1 prafsM Ilia imj gnat nifHciMii!; and happincn uf ifuoJ MaiUnmJ 
[UodcnUlv]. I ihinkUrMaiiuabk, and ■wnwarj', thai, {winavba will, UaiOanil 
shcnitii b* adjoiRMl to thoin. Forgot not Ibla ; for, if thii b« Doiilcdod, it ouaid be 
■Q injury, and a dbigtvc*, to afoatli lliat briuga, bj Ilia nublo «rriagp, cl1^d■l1o 
iHir nation, noil hrJ/- ti -vr fauu.-—1.1lm and J-^Hrn-ih. Writing to Uiiilcrdnl- 



374 ME.V0K1ALS OF THE 

LonJeliip lo say in j'our name, and I hope you will write na inncb to ms, 
wbich I shall show the Kin^;, and give joa a good nccount of it. Last 
night I came hither, with the King'e leave, and am to return to Wind- 
sor on Saturday for good and all, till the King's retnni. Tbie is my 
first letter to any body. We are yet anoertain whether we shall have 
peace or war. Su, I shall say no more at tliis time, but that t am 
meet sincerely, my Lord, your Lordship's nioet humble and moM obe- 
dient servant, 

" {Sic mbicribitvrj, Laudekuale." 



[Ruthes's Ajuwtr, aUo enehrfti.'j 



"May it please your Grace: — 1 was resolved to do myself 
honour last council day ; but lest it might prove troublesome 
diately after your arrival, I rather chose to defer it, knowing yonr' 
Orace would receive an account of what pasaed from other hands, who 
can do it better, and very truly. But when any thing cceura io rela- 
tion to his Majesty's service, 1 shall not be wauiiug to acquaint your 
Grace. For so long as I have life, I shall never fail in my daty to 

liimwlf, from Lnndan, 17tb June I64S, BaillieBaj-s :— " Alf Lord, make hiete hilber, 
(or I lell Jon UicreT« great need of you hero. Wo must rreUle a /all witbaoMf kiitd 
a/ erfalum before our Cotenant be abuliahed. You may »», my Lord, I am 
old nun. Uy lerviw to your kind Lady [bia fint wife] ; and Io jourwir, u 
a« you Temaia honeBt,bnt not an hour longer." Again, '2Dtb February IGIG, Bi 
writes : — ■■ My Lord Lauderdale apoke some few wordN, intimalJDg the moll 
nt the Kiogdnm of Scotland to be (wnKaiit lo their CoHaaat, notwithstandiDg all ths 
cattaiiiia which maligtuuils [loyalists] have ioTented against Uiem, and othera for 
their own ba» ends do spread." When Episcopacy vaa condemned by Ibc Aateok- 
bly of the Covenant in 16-13, Lauderdale, then Lord Maillaud, mads hinuelf ver^ 
oonapimous, and ru9« imioediately into the mnb of a " prime GiveuaDter," — whioli 
means every thiog hypocritical in a churchniBn, and base in a statesman. Tho 
Rev. H«nry Guthry, who was present, tfaus records the aoecdolo -.— 

" It was not tbo custom in Assemblies for any man, while the roll was ■ calling, 
to intempt voicing by discuorHes ; every one was l4i answer the ijueatioa, y«a or 
nay, and no more. Yet the Lord Matttand was so talien with a lAoii^t o/ hit Mpa, 
that he muet needs vent it. So that, when bis voice came t>i be naked, he rooe np, 
iwd spoke to this sense,' How, upon the 17lh of August, four yean ago, sn aot 
passed in the Assembly for thrusting Episoopacy oat of this Qiurdi, and now, npgo 
this 17lh of August (1U43), also sn act wss pasdng for the MlirpifioB of it mt of 
tki Clmreh o/ Eivjlaail, and tlial Providence having ordered it so that both happened 
Io be iu one day, there was nusA ia ■'(, and tbut men might wamuitably thereupoa 
expect ^oiiaiu MawrfurnoH io fuUoif, even farther olf than England, ere il^ 
ilone.' This observation was nppbiudcd by tlio most, as having MNcik quiotnem 
tbangli olbtr* Ihuught it nrry ridic^lv»t."~Gvtkry'i Htmoin. 



I 



kind 

itioB^^H 

I 

I 



VISCOUNT Of DUNDEE. 376 

))im, mi m my readiness to serve liim in liis own way as Le Bhall 
jiiilge fittest ; and I hope I have nut been bu miserably iniafortanate as 
tliHt Itia Majesty evnr <]ueBtioned my readiness in hia service ; and if I 
(lid not, I were tlie nioi't unworthy and ungrateful of all who ever bad 
the honour to serve hini ; for 1 always coucluded, hiii MajuBty'a cntruat- 
tng me in so eminent a Btation, proceeded IVoin his being assured of my 
fidelity, which wag lo counterbalance my untitneBs and inability ; for 
no sooner is his Majcaty's pleasure knun-n tome, hut I am determined. 
The honour your Grace lins done ine, by your favourable represeutalion 

•' of me, is the greatest obligation could be put upon your Urace's most 
humble aud most faithful eurvant, 
■' fSic nibtci-ibitur)^ Kothes." 

[Rothe» in coiiliaualiuH In Qiircnsierry,] 

" Now, my dear Lord, thjii is all ns yet that 1 ever have said to my 
Lord Lauderdale; aud I am informed certainly that I um apokeof very 
ill at London by some of our 8cots people, who say thai 1 have I'uined 
them ; and the thing they load mc with i« my carriage in the Conven- 
tion. Hut aincc you know na well aa I that I have done nothing bnt 
that which is rigbl, just, and honourable, and in obedience to hiH 
Majesty's commands, and for bis interest, I Ju not value what all 
(he world can aay against me ; for 1 am iiurc 1 shall walk in all cir- 
camMtanOM according to what 1 think just and right. Pray let me 
know what yon think of this full and large account of buniness 1 have 
given you, as soon as ]>usBiblu you can. There arti a great many other 
particular circumsIiincCH, but should I act them nil down, it would turn 
the letter lo au enlire volume' So 1 shall end with this, that I am 
Mo stranger to their endeavour of an aocommodaliuu with the Duko of 
Lauderdale,* without inentiooiug your concern or mine ; but 1 can tell 
you with the same breath, and asHun^ you, that he liu< refused, and 

I declared that he would never meddle with five or nix only; and after 
his ac^uainliug of tbe King with this, his Majevty baa approven hira in 
wit 
reo 
; 



1 1 consider bow much I have said in thia lelt<^, 1 am very 
much troubled to find that it is uuly an ordinary bearer, utid nut one 
r own footmen ; and i entreat you, hiulo me back word uf your 
receipt of ibis. Imuiedialoly after I wejit over iho wnter, I wrolo to 

It »"UlJ luve twen .if inoni viJuii lliui > Tiildinu of Uiimul, Wudmw.or UiD);. 
Mluilin|[ to tlin tisniiltim ractloii, «<irkiii|; in LoDilon ii(;itm>l Laudiidnliii of 



376 KEUORULS OF THE 



in; Lord Uatton conc«niing your aignatare, but bsve had 
ooncenting it. But I <lo oot in the least doubt the succ«bs of it. Since 
I believe we shall have a Council here before long, pray tie in readi- 
ness, that, Dpon a short &dvertisemetit from me, you may give youTHelf 
the traublu of a journey in, although it were but for a nigbt or two. 
I will not injure myself so much as in the least to doubt your Lordship 
believes nod knotrs that I am uualterubly your most faithful servant, 

'■ R."' 

And 60 Bothes established bimself with Luuderdale and 
the King, retaining firm bold the while of his powerful and 
rising friend Qiieensberry, keeping aloof from the weak facHoD 
of Baniiltou, and clear of the conventicles, which his Coun- 
tesB really believed to be a divine institntioii. Manifestly the 
Chancellor had come to be conscientiously of opinion, that 
agaiiuit the asscmblingof these dangerous field meetings mea- 
sures too strong could not be adopted ; and he labour&d zea- 
lously with his friend and coadjutor, the calumniated and 
doomed Primate, to eradicate that cancer from the land. 
Meanwhile, amid hia ceaseless labours and endless occups^ 
tioDS, he led a hard life, hawking and hunting, feasting and 
drinking, subjected ever and anon to a lecture from the Arch- 
bishop relating to his morals, and cautions from Queensbeny 
uu the score .of his health. Uo thus uxites to the latter on 
the 17th November 1678 :— 



i 



" As to what you say concerning my health, I am very mnch obtiged 
to you for your care, and I were very unjust to myself if I questioned 
your kindness : but those makes so great a noise of it, does it upon 
another account than to oblige me, but on the contrary j for they lay 
it for an infallible foundation, that if my finger but ache, it is an eflect 
of debauching ; for at that time when they made that noise, I never kept 
my chamber an hour, nor the house, but was still abroad, but bad a loose- 
neea, and that absolutely without pain, which went away without physic 
or glyster. Now, I thank God I never was better. I do not much 
care what they say of me, for I am pretty well used to be lashed with 
the tongues of two several parties ; but possibly 1 may live to remem- 
ber it. Out indeed I am very niuoh troubled that t/ou should be joilged 
|h(^ cause, which it! indeed new In nie; and etrtainly you know your- 

' Qiifensljeny Pa|iers. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 377 

self Innocent of it ; for you may remember tbiil there mas notUing 
cxtrtLonltDary bolwixt us, except ihrre morning drinha; one at Morton's, 
one at jonr bouae, and anotber at mine; at all which we were never 
the lengtli of bottles the man. Bnt this is a subject not wortliy laking 
up so much time, either for me to write, or yon to read." 

In less than a week after the daU; of tliia letter he informs 
Queenflberry, — 

" I bave been IVequcntly at onr meetings in my Lord St Andrews 
lodgings, where we are busied taking care how to dispose of the forces 
through thi! country, for suppressing field conventicles, and others, for 
securing of the peace in this conjuncture ; which I hope we shall in a 
short time effectuate, or at least discover the inipoieibilily of it ; which 
I am very far from believing, if there were a course taken to oblige 
and engage noblemen and gentlemen that have interest in the country. 
But without thai, wq will give ourselves a great deal of unnecessary 
trouble." 

The year 1679 brought double double toil and trouble to all 
concerned, hotb in England and Scotland. On th« 5th of 
January of that year, the Chancellor thus sounds a note of it, 
— Laudi-rdftle still ruling the roast, while the Hamilton clique 
are faehly, but pertinaciously, bating and baying at him in 
London : — 



" Tdy Lord Lothian and General DalycU came home yesterday, but 
were long by the way, and know nut so much as we do by the packets. 
1 have spoke with them both, and they positively assert the Ouke of 
Lauderdale never was so well in Court; nor this ten years past «u 
vigorous and so well in bis health. But they say, to my gn-at regret, 
tliero was never nation in so great disorder and dislnrbance aa tliti 
|>eople of England arc ; and that particularly against bis Royal High* 
ness, who, they say, carries very fiiir. Though be judges very well 
of his own condition, 1 shall only say, and wish, that God may direct 
and preserve the King and him. My dear LunI, if any thing occur, 
either private or public, very significant, yon shall not fail to have an 
account of it, from yours, 

" K." 




3TS WFwwiirjg or thx 

Az Ieii;nii Lftiiiieriale appears t»j be rail in g Tke c«Hii2ih> 
tians in F,ng?Anti ir-^^ meafi and -inzLk to th^^ rknAri^MK in 
Scodanii. Tint Tnag^:lt>pieic Laiiur iniGmi:* us. tnaf. as tkb 
dme. — '* The w»w»rr:ra *aii southern 3iizr«s w^t& fiUed witli 
garri^^iLi in prrncir hi:a:«e:s. or wirk trcow penmtiHed c«> Fm^ 
^ ftur^ ra. Y^>ist :f 'iccviiauicLe*. aii«i iMdemmi/kfi tor -fc^nry 
minkrif 'XTmniftTjad in -iiic ieariK cr p^rrsnh. AiflitioiiAl judges 
wi^rr 'icTyiTm'qffioiLefi in eaeK -loccirT. wii ulc mo€t vigorovia in- 
scrnctiiins to enforce the law?.^ and the uhyst nnlizniced and 
iesffjXicsl powers in. ecclesiastical affairs:' and tbeir dili- 
gence, anii im/9Ufiice. were e*jTiaIIj ftiinalated br permisaon to 
appropriate a moietj of the fines to themselres.' The worst 
tyrannj is a despotism im<ier the disgmse of the laws.^ On 
the digkiest erpr^mifm^ or 9H9picirm^ of discontent, the oppo- 
nents of LentdtrdaU were accnseil of propagating sedition, 
imprisonai and fined bj the Priry Conncil ; and under the 
accnmnlated oppressions of 6<jTemnient men began to grow 
weary of their conntry, and even of their lires. In the f orioos 
administration of Lauderdale, it is In vain to search for the 
remote and latent caoses of public events, or to reduce them 
imder any common arrangement or description of crimes. 
Every new severity was pro^luotive of aJ«litional discontent, 
which fresh severities were employe*! to exasperate and re- 
press : nor is a different principle to be 'liscovered in the 
government of Scotland, daring the reigns of Charles and his 



1 RjgoTooii iostmetioos to enforce the Uvs against nwawinatioDg^ and mur- 
derons rebellion, aeems no great crune in a GoTemment. Tbe comniiasioners 
had the OAual anthoritjr of judges under sncfa circnmstanees. 

* Najr, it was tbcMe who mordered Axchbiabop Sharpe who exexvised aaefa 
powers. 

* A mlgar ftctJon. Sedition and insorrection, of tbe most dangeroos character, 
and in tbe most eritieal of tames, was properly and nccessanljr made to pay the ex- 
pennes of its own sappresMon ; and thoa« emplo^red in tbe dangeroos and dis- 
C^tin;; 'luty, were, ander stnct regulations of Government, rewarded accordingly. 
Wodrow's dreary rolumes arc by way of being rendered awfully imposing, by his 
endless, snd doubtless very ill vouched lists of fines, every individual item of which 
goes, in bis history, for a Government extortion and cruelty. We verily believe 
that no man was ever fined during those troubles, that did not more or less deserve 
it. Inde«<l, in many of his instances Wodrow fails ridiculously. 

* Tlio worst anarchy is a rebellion under the disguise of religion. How easy is 
it to frame such apothegms. 



I 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 379 

brother James.' As the vindictive rigour aud resentment of 
goverument were at onco the cauae and effect of the public 
disconteiit* each year, aud, with a single trausieut exception," 
every administration was worse than the preceding. Persecvr 
Uon and fanaticism continued mutually to exasperate and 
augment each other ; but it is the nature of persecution to 
vitiate the human heart, and to debase and contaminate the 
national charact«r, wherever it prevails.* The unhappy vic- 
tims whom it reduces to despair, become vindictive, cniel, and 
unrelenting as their persecutors ; and if inferior in open force, 
more insidious in their reveuge. The Covenanters had already 
begun to retaliate on the military, of whom some were mur- 
dered at night in their quarters,* when an event, which 
threatened to revive the practico» of Ihe ancient Scots, im- 
pelled each party to the most desperate extremes."" 

" There goes Higgius," — cried the Colonel's wife, as that 
inspecting otEcer galloped past, — " every second word an oath, 
bo sure, and the other a growl." And there, we may say, 
goes magniloquent Malcolm, every second sentence an histori- 
cal calumny, and all the rest exaggeration. Such is his Jesuiti- 
cal introduction to that pet performance, that cherished and 
sacred incident, (hut difficult to defend withal), the murder of 
Archbishop Sharp ! Not to speat of Lauderdale, — who, as 
thorough covenanting-bred, we admit to be out of the pale of 
humanity in the question, — how Kothes, and Hamilton, aud 
Queensberry, and Twoeddale, and Monmouth, and Russell, and 
Kincardine, and Lothian, and Haddington, and Roxburgh, and 



■ There i* matumHU euggsnlian, indeed wonc, in nil Ilii*. 
' CoaocDJCDt pbrun, for ft vliig hiiloriui of UhiH' tnublM. 

' Same trifling and partial aBteiiiliuie}' oT a weak faetiua, which Malcolm I^ing 
siDiidcRd bimaolf bound to camplimonL 

■ Ail Ibi* !■ mucb tho Hune m Hying, tliat tlio cHtnlnat and the law, iha uaa«- 
^n and tfae hnngnuu, iha miUtT and the headinuui, tlio rebel riotor and Iha jail, 
*■ continued mutually lo viwpcnlc and augmcait oub athiiT ;" but that It la Iba 
nature tit the (lunlnliincDt uf cnmc, aed of tbo auplireMion tt lioo, ■■ lo riliata lb* 
buDian heart and In Uebaie and ooDUminals lb* nalittnal ehwaclBr." SiyVi tba 

^^■^ 'iincraiiwiil muniared Archbithap Sharp. 

^^^R * Anil nKirv wvn thot froai boliind dj'km ; and tbrae cowardly murden uf tha 

^^^1 poor toldiera, fulfilling tlieir mililarjr onlen, our whig bbriorian, tmdar and trm to 
^^^1 tile parpeUvton, plaroo under llie bialorical utegorj of a natural * reUtliation" I 
^^^1 * Waa the murdor of the I'rimate nol a " doapoinlc eilrcmo" h> begin wilh f 



380 MEMORIALS OF THE 

Perth, and Aberdeen, and Cassilis, and Loudon, and Coclirane, 
and, indeed, every contemporary nobleman and gentleman in 
the two kingdoms, — ^unless it were Shaftesbury and Burnet, — 
with a spark of gentlemanly feeling and humanity in their 
hearts, or a grain of common sense in their heads, — ^knowing as 
they did, by what a scum of cowardly scoundrelism the s^ed 
Primate was in reality beset and murdered, — ^would have stared, 
and cried, " No, no I* could they have heard the act, and the 
actors, historically recorded and described in such sympathi^ 
ing Lainese as the following, — " Nine of those unhappy Jugi- 
tives, who toandered in small parties^ intercommuned and in- 
terdicted from society, determined to intercept and chastise 
his person, if not to avenge their torongs on his life :" or in 
such imitative Macaulese as this, — " In Scotland, some of the 
persecuted Covenanters, driven mad by oppression, had lately 
murdered the Primate."* 

Two days before that foul deed, Bothes thus writes : — 

" For the Earl of Queensberry, These : " 

** Edinburoh, Zrd Matf, 1 679. 

** My Dear Lord : — I know Hugh Wallace carried to you the news 
of the great change above, which was surprising there as well as here. 
There is not as yet much of consequence followed upon it, though any 
rational body must conclude there will. But that is but guessing, let 
people say what they please. There was very few in England knew 
of it before it was done ; and no mortal here. This new Council has 
made some proposals to the King, which are no sooner desired than 
granted ; and most people concludes it will continue so ; and it is 
rational to believe it, it having pleased his Majesty to go the length he 
has, which I pray God may prove to his honour and advantage, and 
the interest of his family, the peace, quiet, and tranquility of his king- 
dom. Although, I suppose, you be not acquainted with many of the 
persons, yet I doubt not, when you read the names of the Council, yon 
will remember what you have heard of them formerly, and so conse- 
quently know their principles. 

" Now, to come to our affairs at home. The Duchess of Hamilton 

' History of England, vol. i. p. 2d7, — obviously purrotising Laing. 



/ 



MSCODNT OF DUNDEK. 



381 



went anny ycBterdajr, and the Duke this inoming, for l^ndon. The 
Enrl of Kincardine and hie Lady went yesterday, and Broomball last 
night post. You may be sure their expectations arc great, of my Lord 
Lauderdale's fall ; which is moat rational if an address, or impeachment, 
be made agiunal him ; and really, for myself, I do not doubt there will ; 
and I aa little question in my own opinion, that if there be, the King will 
give way. For who can imagine, since he ban parted with his own bro- 
ther, nnil his groat favourite the Treasurer, that he will stick at him ; al- 
though ray Lord Lauderdale, by his letters to his friends, is still moBi con- 
fident, and desires them not to fear hira. If the King bo reconciling him 
snd Shaftesbury I do not know, but a very few days will try it. Since 
my Lord Duke of Hamilton came to town he has been very often liere, 
and, in appearance, extraordinary civil. Bnl ho and I was not alone ; but 
in all comjinny who were with us wc talked of public business. But 
yesterday morning my Lord Cochrane came to me, who yoii know is a 
very worthy and ingenuous person, and ri^grctted very much that then* 
was not that trust and confidence betwixt thu Duke and me that there 
used to bo. I lolil him I was very much the Duke's servant, and 
wiabcd him well, and knew no cause for it ; but that there was excep- 
tions taken at my carriage in the last Convention ; and I told him, that 
having the King's command for it, and being convinced of the fitness 
of the thing were it yet to do I would re-act what I had done ; and 
if I did not, I were not worthy the station I am in. Then it was pro- 
posed that I should join in counsels, what was lit to be done. I said, 
they would know much better upon the place than I could do at thai 
distance ; and, for advice and counsel to the Ring, he knew Tcry well 
I hod always shunned anything of that nature, although very oflen 
pressed by him ; anil that I would never do it, IJII the King was pleased 
to command it ; and then I should, with that trccdom that became a 
bithful servant. So, when Cochrane gave my return, ho said it wns 
I very true, and that he was very Korry I was sliU so wnry. 

" Cochrane is gone homo, and so wo ore all parted. Tiierv i« 
mother Coutieil-day to be upon Wednesday ; at which time 1 am to 
be here, and shall iiilrcat you may have such a tnisty person, that I 
may spenk to with freodoro, here against that time ; for there is no 
writing lest letters miscarry. I think 1 have at hut prevailed with 
the Bishop of St Andrews to go up, and am going to Fifo on purpou 
to bring him back. There ia no time now for sitting still. Many talk 
now a« if I were (o be called up ; but it is but a story ; and you may 
Hsure youroelf, that very minute I imagine my such thing you nhiill 



382 MEMORIALS OF THE 

know it ; with whom I shall never have any reserve ; nor cease to be 
your most humble servant, 

'* / doubt not your immediate burning qfthis,^*^ 

Grod had 'billed otherwise, than that the Bishop of St An- 
drews should at this time meet his Sovereign in London. 
The above letter is dated on Saturday, the 3rd of May, 1679, 
and was delivered to Queensberry's messenger before twelve 
o'clock noon of that day. About the very same hour of that 
same day, the vilest of Satan's emissaries caused the good and 
venerable Prelate to pass through the mortal agonies that 
were to conduct him to the Throne of Grace. If ever the 
dying cry of helpless humanity ascended to that Throne, to 
bear witness against, and bring judgment upon, the descen- 
dants of Cain, it was when that Christian pastor said to his 
darling daughter, — " Gk)d help me, my poor child, for I am 
gone." If ever the articulate voice of the Prince of Liars was 
heard out of Hell, it was on Magus Moor, when in the face of 
day, and under the eye of God, those wretches cried aloud, — 
" Come out Judas, come out cruel bloody traitor." On the 
evening of that day, the Chancellor was travelling from Hat- 
ton House, where he had been at the christening of an heir to 
the Earldom of Lauderdale, and was about to cross at the 
Queensferry on his return to his beloved hawking and hunt- 
ing at Leslie. The stunning news met him there, and at ten 
at night he returned to Edinburgh and summoned the Coun- 
cil. The particulars of this awful sign of the times have been 
given in a former page of these Memorials ; and also the agi- 
tated letter which the Chancellor wrote to his friend Queens- 
berry, dated from Edinburgh on Monday, 6th May, 1679.' 
The particulars need not be repeated here. This climax of 
covenanting iniquity did indeed, as Rothes -vvTitcs, " very much 
alter the face of affairs here." It was a comment upon the 
Covenant of Scotland, and its blasphemous assumption of a 
divine mission of peace on earth* and good will to men, written 

* Queensberry Papers. i Sec before, p. 264. 



VISCOUNT OF DUNDEE. 



383 



I 



L 



in charactore of blood as indelible as tbo sigu ou the forehead 
of Caiu. Loose and rcckloBs liver as Eothes was, in early 
yoiilh devoted to diasoluto ladies, and in his rijior years to 
hawking, hunting, and wine, his heart was in the right place, 
and his intellect3 unclouded by the madness of fanaticism. 
With all hia faults, and they were many and Berious, one can- 
not help admiring the great energy of his mind, which in a 
moment could shake off the effects of his dissipated habits, and 
at the head of such tiirbnlont councils as he had to direct in 
Scotland, and upon such trying occasions, set himself night and 
day to the labours of a foundering State, with his courageous 
heart as sound as a roach, and bis head clear as a licll. All 
his revels and his sports are for the time cast aaide and disre- 
garded. " I will hasten to Fife," he says, " that I may add 
my endeavours, with all the faculties of my soul, for the dia- 
covery of this late horrid murder." Yet, at such a crisis, hp 
was in no slight danger himself; although, iudeed, the cove- 
nanting cowards found it more safe to attack an old prelate in 
the arms of his daughter, than the high-couraged Rothes, with 
his hawks and his hounds. " As it is talked," he also tells us, 
" those base unworthy people in Fife, threaten they will fol- 
low the same example with several persons in public trust, 
not sparing your humble servant ; but I am not afraid in the 
least for them."' And there is something noblo in that heart- 
felt tribute to the maligned martyr, who had so often coun- 
selled and lectured him on tlie ungodly habits of his life, — a 
tribute which none can read without feeling how infinitely it 
outweighs the trash of a Wodrow, or the fiash of a M»caulay, 
— " Let the unjust world say what they will, ho was not only 
Lord Primate of thJis luugdum, but a faithful subject, and a 
IPtm: antl jmit pertttm, and a inosl eminent pillar of the Church; 
and, I am sure, my friend at that rate that I do not know what 

■ Aooordingl}', on Uia 0th of SaptrmlMt- Ottntlttr, Um Mosnilnla twTlng r«- 
Mited llieir due at Oothiroll Brid)^, anil ihv Onwmiarhtt (but mttnlan uid ii ■■ 
Hnationa Mill rife), mr find Ibr Cliannllar tfaiu writing to QoMnibcrr; » If bin 
oIBm were > brd of rowa, and fife a millcniuin i " 1 am liTing lictv anilvr my own 
fig<trM, Iiawkiog and hunting oTDr7 day ; and 1 aamira you, yoa aie rery ofieii and 
v*ry iiindly renwiBiberHl by all (hr tompiiiy with iM,bat pwticuUrly byyoan, R." 



■(fwttHilirrTf Fa/tn. 



MEMORIALS OF TITE 



to do since be in gone, bm to revenge myself npon that It 
tleriTUf sect." 



This fearful crisis cast the feehle faction of Haniilton, — thel 
patriotic-party, if that interested cabal against Laudeniale de-l 
serve so to Ix; called, — entirely on their backs, and left the mora I 
energetic minion once more triumphant. Such events as thtl 
murder of the Primate, at noonday on the high-road, and 1 
consequent rieing in arms, wore not to be trifled vrith. In-j 
deed, not long afterwards, Hamilton finds himself constraint 
to become a " persecutor ;" and it is instructive to discover t 
leader of that opposition to Lauderdale expressing his alarm a 
" that horrid murder at Swine Abbey ,"• of tho two gentlemen I 
of iherojalguard, and also describing the murderers of the sol- 1 
rliora at InchbcUy Bridge, whom his own people had i 
hended, as " the iusolentest rogues that ever I spoke to." Onci 
again, however, tlio King's good nature is prevailed upon 1 
hear this cabal in full debate before himself, even after 1 
battle of Bolbwell Bridge, and when the faction imagine* 
that Monmouth himsell' would now be their leader, if not th 
King. The graphic details, and melodramic conclusion, i 
written by Kothes in bis best manner to Queensberty, and are 
quite new to history. 



" for thf Earl of Queenaberty, Tliest ' 



" Mr Dear Lord :- 
you, if you had come Ii 
been news to you, and 
I am glad you did not 



" Ttnmhobibk, 21M Awjutt, l&T.l. 
-I had a great many long storiea Ui have told 
Edinburgh, which then, I am sure, would have 
which it is probable you have now heard ; but 
wme BiDce it would have been a tronblu to yog. 



and especially since I could not have stwd with you ; for juat as the 
Council rose my Lord Murray and I went to Fife, and upon ray return 
to Edinburgh, I came to thja place, where I find great joy, and very 
good cause for it, uiy daughter being recovering much better than 
ordinary, and my grandchild an extreme fine boy.^ I have now spare 

• Soc boroK, pp. 233, 343. 

' rrobitbl]' tliia was the trnond »ii of tho nurriago between Rothes's daaghler 
■nil livirw, Lulf Margu«t Leslie, wicli ChkrleB, fifth Earl of Iloddinglon. It <ru 
kM'«ii){nl 'liat no \\\f elJcisI urn at IhM mnrriflgc hodIcI h»ve right to hia mother's 



VTSCOUNT OF DUNDEE. dOO 

time, and I am eure I cannot employ it more gratefully to my own in- 
clinntioii t1ian by conversing «-ilh you in this way, fiinco wo are not 
now, I think, like to meet in liasto, 

" There is no consideraiilo news to be expected from Englttnd, un- 
less some new and unexpected emerge, — which is iho opinion of all 
who came down, and of those who are correMpondont with them, — 
till the Parliament f^il ; at Icaat the Council, whiuh you know was od- 
jonmcd by tho King till after Mieliaolmaa ; which he did of hinmelf, 
and aomo of them were pleased with it, and others much the con- 
trary. 

" You mnst understand, the Council of England ia now considered 
unJoubtt'dly to lie dirided into three several partieit, each of them al- 
most ei]nnl in number. The Earl of Shaftesbury the head of one ; tbo 
Lord Kobarts of another, — who, you know no doubt, is lately made an 
Earl but I have forgot his title ; ' and my Lord Flalifax tlic third ; and 
it is said debates arise very oft (o a great ]iilch among tliem. My 
Lord Russell ia believed to be turning on to Halifax ; but they say 
Cavendish as yet holds fist to Shaftesbury. But what to make of Ibe 
resolution the King has taken I know not ; for my Lard Robarts is to 
go as Embassador to S[)ain, and my Lord of Ormond is recalled from 
Ireland, and my Lord llulifox goes there uuder tho character of Lord 
Lieutenant. This ia not only in all our private letters, hut in the 
public newsletter. Now, if the head of their jiarties be sent away, I 
conclude those that have joined wilh them will crumble into pieces. 
But it is simply impossible to judge of things and their causes at this 
distance ; but no doubt a little time will clear up all. 

" The groat talk and news at Court is concerning the elections, in 
the several counties and incorporations, for the ensuing Parliament. 
Most of persons of interest over the whole kingdom are gone to the 
oouatry concerning it; and some eay the elections will be olherwayi 
thftn they were last. Others believe that there will be but a very few 

Earidom of ItolbM, tlia janiar Earldoni of Haddington •boulil deinlvo upon Uivir 
Mcoad son ; wliieii TIkiuim, eixth Earl of Krtdditiicloii wru. Tliis I'nr has lift ■ 
enrioui mi intemting accmint at iiow lie eiioio to cloltw hii originally bink pliM 
of Tjuningluiiic wiUi tboas nugniHcvot wooils, ud fomt invo, which now so 
great]; adorn llul ImuliruJ rMldrnw, and, indml, the coaiity of £aat I^otUan. 
Tha lata Lord Haddington, not long twfore hi> liincnicd dialli, erected In a coa- 
•picQoui vista of of lluMO woods, a liandnnniE obolisk lo eommcmonte tliiilr liiiitor7, 
■ad in boiiour oF tlio onlerpriiung aDcetlor In oliom Lotli llio iifrlL-ullurB and 
the amenitj' of that part of tlie cmmtrjr is >u niucli iiidEbleil.— 5e« bcforv, p. 3£i, 



^L Bou* 



a bccomo catinct. It la ni 



sob HEHOBIAl^ OF THE 

changed. Jast u I c&me this length, I receiTed the honour of juurs ' 
of the ISlh, where I God you in a gre«t passion in relation to your 
signature. I have often told you, freUinQ oaA huffing hnrta one's aelf 
more than the person who offends thera. This in genera) I can assure 
yoa, toy Lord Treaaurer-Depule' upon all occasions does say aa kind 
things of you as ever man did of another ; and I am told by several 
hands that hia brother does to too ; but so aooo as I come to Edinburgh, 
I shall obey you, in giring you a full account of all relating to your 
signature. I am to be in Edinburgh on Monday, and my wife and 
family and I goes for Fife on Wednesday ; bo [ am afraid I sbKlt , 
be BO unhappy as not to see you at this time ; but if you do not coma, i 
f beseech you let a footman be with me on Tuesday night. | 

" Now, to return, as I iras g<oing on before I received yours : I atiail 
l«ll you a very pleasant story anent the debate that tras at Londoa 
before the King, among our countrymen. No doubt ye heard of the 
great bearing they had at Windsor, where my Lord Duke of Hamilton, 
the Earl of Caasillis, Perth, Atbole, Kincardine, and all the gentle- 
men, even to Sir John Cochrane, were present with their lawyers ; 
and, on the other aide, none but my Lord Advocate.' Sir Gooi^ 
Lockhart, and Sir John Cimninghome, spoke both. Sir John, ihey 
lay, spoke very well, but Sir George was admired by the King and all 
that heard him.^ And in earnest they say the Advocate spoke be- 
yond himself. Whereupon, the King called his Advocate, and said, 
he would ever thereafter call him Tom Duff, which is a name they give 
n bare, in boar-garden at Southwark, that tights and beats all the rest 
alone.' But they say the King prompted the Advocate very often, 
having been so frequently informed by the five lords ho called up. 
the Advocate came to the King, and swore a great oath, that ' your- 



' Lord Hilton, Laudi.>vJale> brother. See befui-e, p. 309, as (o tbe royal signa- 
lurc, or wnrrant, about wliidi Qucenaberr)' appeure lo liave been vo anidaus. 

I Sir Geoi^ Mnckcnzic, rccciittj' appointed lo that office in room of Sir John 

'I Sir Georgu Loclibiirt became Preddeol of tbe Court of ScBuian, and fell by Uie 
band of llie uaaBain Cbiealy of Dair;, a wortb; adherent of tbo fanatic^ Beet in 
Scotland, and ouu who foUovBd their owd peeuliar docIriDes, in Batisfjiog ■ nuJe- 
voleot enmity bj a cowardly raurdpr. 

■ " Bore," and " Boar-garden" are dislinelly bo n-rillen in the letter. Probably, 
however, " Tom Duff" wna a boar, and Bear-garden meant. ThiB royaJ and 
ancient amphitheatre was still the great nrona of savage Bporta in the reign of 
Oiarlea II. ; aa we learn especially fram Pepya. Perhaps " Tom Duff" ww a do- 
aoeodant of " Sackorsou," tbe favourite bear in the rclgu of E^iiabelb, and immor- 
taliacit by ShaUospeare. 




VISCODNT OF DUNDEi:. 387 

lie^tttg is Tom Duff; for you have said more conTincing tbis, than 1 
am able to say, or can be answered.' So, yon know, afler that, the 
King declared bimaelf aatisfied with his CouDcil and Judgea, and ap- 
proved of alL But at last up cornea the Duko of Mounionth ; aod then 
the Duke of HarnilUia and the reat addrcasod to him, and begged a 
.lecoad hearing, which the King had refused. He undertook it ; and, 
after a great deal of paina, he prevailed. So the day was appointed, 
and all concerned made ready to apeak, the King having vowed it 
■hoiild bo the laet hearing, which was to be in the afternoon ; and ou 
a sudden, about ten o'clock, breaks out a report, that the Earl of Mid- 
dleton and my Lord Tarbat were made by the King conjunct Secre- 
taries, bad kissed the King's hand upon it, and their commissions 
sigued. This was so peremptorily asserted, and so positively believed, 
that no creature doubted it. Whereupon, the Duke of Hamilton 
being there, and all the reat, they retired to the gallery to talk, and all 
struck with amaze.' And at last Duke Hamilton swore a great oath, 
' my Lord Atholc, and Perth, or some of them, knew of it, and had 
gone along and Ictl him.' Whereupon, they full all in great heat and 
disorder, and broke into pieces, and seuvMit. Duko Hamilton and Sir 
George Lockhart, they joined : my Lords Athole, Perth, and Cassillis, 
they joined : my Lord Kincardine, and Uroomhall, they joined : So at 
lost my Lord Duke swore a great oath, that he would fall on his kneew 
to the King that Lauderdale migkl be cuntinued I ' But I will go to 
tbe King,' — and did ; and begged his pardon for the trouble be bad 
given Iiiro ; and entreated that the roectiog hia Majcaty had appointed 
might desert ; which was accordingly done ; and when these Lords 
partod they were exceeding ill ono with another ; but if they be recon- 
ciled since I do not know. But the Duke of Monmouth was mad 
to be so used ; and said to the King, — ' God damn him if ever hf 
meddled more wUh them!' Tbe King was extraordinarily pleased 
with this. But when he heard the report concerning the Secretaries, 
he Bwore by godawounda it was n lie, and tlicy were rogues had in- 
vented it. 

1 Al Ibb titDD Sir Gcorgp Mu-krniio of Tirbit nai I^urd JuBtiiv-Gimnl uf 
Scotland ; bul bo did not gel hii pwniKo ""til 1 U^S. He sod Chsrlca, Mcood Eiirl 
uf Middlotoii, liad pravioudy been tumcU out of otHrr, for tlioir ditorminiid o|i|>u«- 
tioo U l.«aderdftle ; so thai lhi> rupon of Ihoir becoming joint Secrctarlvo of State 
uotltr tlin Lut4irrdal» aUiniiiwlrkllan ou poculurl/ galllog to llarolltnn, M tlw *cr> 
lima be and iiU fKliun were utriiggling to bring tin favourite under iinpeaeliinent. 
Tliore *■«, bowevor, do truth in the rvpott al that time. :tlidi]|cion beeamc Mivrr- 
tar; of State luwarda Iha etoM of the year \Q»2, la we sliall aflerwanls flud. 



r ^ 



• » 



MEMORIALS OF THE TKOOtFNT OF DUKDEE. 



" This Ions 
charge _i 




tpdimis story I liave from Hoveral handK; bat 4 

'ulca of strict friendsbip, not lo say a word t4 

V my lelter, but l;urn it.* Now, if ibis be 

id you sball have a longer next, from joq 



obej'ed this order, by writing apon ihe back of the letter,— 
ml Dukr Hamilton" {e.,— and curefalty preeerriug it ai 
Ari^Iiivcs. Ab its private uid confidential conlcntB are onlv now d 
made knonn, a Imndrod and eiglil)' yean after its date, Itotfaes pmbkh^ *3lfl 
longer object. It is amaBing lo compare Woilrow'B account of Duke Hilg 
patriotie debates, with the foregoing letter : — « Monmouth,'' bo says, •■ e 
Windsor on the IDlli (July 1li79), and, it may be, tbo second eonfen-neQ, oi 
13th, took its rise from him," &C. " I find one letter, writ at this 
upon Saturday Duke Hnmilton got notice thai, as soon aa the King's alFun « 
allow it, the Earl of Middleton and Lnrd Tarbat were to bo made joini 
in tha Dulie'a rooui, upon which he declined insisting aay further," &c. 8tt IT3 
ror'f Hittory, tdI. iii. p. 169. The real story proves, that both the King and 
HonmouUi's estimate of Hamilton's patriotism was very juU. He ni>c onlv " de- 
clined insisting Tixiy further," but went lo the King m a passion of disappointed selt- 
inlerest, entreating him lo hear Ihe patriotic psrty no further against Lauderdale, 
■nd begged pardgn for his pix'vious attacks on the Goremment of Scotland. No 
wonder that Monmouth, nlioin Ihi'y bad coaxed and inveigled into being their go- 
between with tbitKing, banned tbem as bores and humbugs. 




■ 


^m 


.D9.M2 
v.l 


■ 


m 


■ffliiiiTnin 

bios 014 Itl 111 






J 








] 






DATE DUE 


' 




SPRING 1983 
































































































1 


H 




1 








1 




1 






STANFORD UNIVERSITY UBRARIES 

STANFORD, CAUFORNIA 

94305 


' 


1 






^1