THE MERCHANT NAVY
HISTORY OF THE GREAT WAR
BASED ON OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
BY DIRECTION OF THE HISTORICAL SECTION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF IMPERIAL DEFENCE
THE
MERCHANT NAVY
Vol. I
BY
ARCHIBALD KURD
LONDON
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET, W
1921
t)
Stl
i/./
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PREFACE
WHEN the peace was broken on August 4th, 1914,
nothing suggested that British merchant seamen would
fare worse than their predecessors of the Napoleonic era,
and the statement that the'y would be compelled to face
perils in intensity and variety unparalleled in human
experience would have been rejected as unbelievable in
face of all the efforts made at The Hague to humanise
warfare. Events falsified all anticipations.
After the comparative failure of the attack on commerce
by surface craft — cruisers and auxiliary cruisers — the
enemy became convinced that in the submarine he had
found the means of cutting the communications of the
British Empire, and of shutting off from the European
battle-fields the essential supplies without which the troops
could not continue to fight. The use of the submarine
for commerce destruction involved the infraction of inter-
national law as well as the ignoring of the code of
humanity, since these small craft, packed with machinery
and equipped for war, were unable to accommodate the
crews of ships sunk, whether by torpedo, gunfire, or
botiibs. The German flag had already been banished from
the highways of the world. So, in desperation, it was
decided, whatever the loss of human life might be, and
without respect for considerations of law, however widely
recognised, to embark on a policy which, rightly or
wrongly, became generally known as piracy.
This decision changed the whole aspect of the War so
far as merchant seamen were concerned. As the cam-
paign made progress it became apparent that the British
merchant seamen were being forced by circumstances,
over which neither they nor the British naval authorities
had any control, into the forefront of the struggle by
sea. They had entered the Mercantile Marine with no
thought that they would be exposed even to such trials
ri PREFACE
and sufferings as their predecessors sustained during the
previous Great War, for there had been much talk at
various international Conferences of ameliorating the con-
ditions of warfare ; they found themselves involved in a
conflict waged by a merciless enemy with large and newly-
developed resources. The seamen were defenceless, for this
emergency had not been foreseen either by the Admiralty,
by the shipowners, or by the seamen themselves. As the
campaign continued, the Germans fornid that their best
hope of sucdess lay in discharging their torpedoes without
warning, leaving the crews, and in some cases passengers,
at the mercy of the elements.
In these cdnditions it was thought appropriate that an
official history should be prepared, placing on record for
all time the manner in which British seamen, refusing to
be colwed by the enemy's threats, confronted a ruthless
foe, regarding their own lives as cheap if, in spite of the
perils they willingly faced, the stream of ocean traffic,
necessary alike for naval, military, and economic reasons,
were maintained. This history was consequently undet-
taken, at the suggestion of the Board of Trade, under the
authority of the Historical Section of the Committee of
Imperial Defence towards the close of 1917, the proposal
receiving the cordial support of the Admiralty and the
Ministry of Shipping.
The ordeal to which the men of the British Mercantile
Marine submitted with generous patriotism can be ap-
preciated only if it is described in an appropriate setting,
ignoring neither the plans of the naval authorities for the
protection of merchant shipphig, elaborated in the years
before the outbreak of war, nor the measures afterwards
adopted to enable merchant shipping to resist with better
hope of success the enemy's policy. On the other hand,
no attempt has been made to deal with the naval operations
undertaken by the Admiralty for the protection of this
country's sea communications, except in so far as they
immediately concerned the Mercantile Marine, nor with
the economic effects of the naval war on ocean-borne trade.
The former subject has been treated in the companion work
by Sir Julian Corbett, and Mr. C. Ernest Fayle has
become responsible for the latter.
While British seamen, uncovenanted to the State, had
never had to confront such an ordeal as that of 1915-18,
PREFACE vii
it would be to misunderstand the history of the British
Mercantile Marine, of which little has been written, to
conclude that never before had sailors of the Merchant
Service taken part in our wars, creating traditions handed
down from generation to generation with increasing pride.
On the contrary, the Merchant Navy was the defence of
the nation's sea interests and its bulwark against
invasion before the Royal Navy had any existence, and
after the foundation of the Royal Navy it continued to
bear no small share in the sea defences of the country.
It has been thought not inappropriate to the story which
these volumes tell to give in very brief summary, as
a preliminary chapter, some account of the contribution of
British merchant seamen in the past to this country's
maritime history ; this summary furnishes a fitting back-
ground to the unexampled record of high courage, un-
complaining suffering, and in thousands of instances
martyrdom, which the late struggle has provided as an
example and inspiration to future generations. The
theme is a great one, and there is a tendency to forget
that the Merchant Navy was the creator of the Royal Navy.
As soon as the task of preparing this History was
Undertaken, it became apparent that, if the record were
strictly confined to the experiences of merchant seamen
in passenger and cargo-carrying ships, it would con-
vey an inadequate impression of the dauntless courage,
fine resource, and dogged endurance of the men serving
by sea, who were exposed to the full fury of the
enemy's campaign, and of the wide range of the services
they rendered. The Germans determined to hold up, or
destroy, merchant shipping, and their failure is traceable
alike to the spirit exhibited by the crews of merchant
vessels and to the manner in which merchant seamen,
fishermen, yachtsmen, and others responded to the
Admiralty's invitation when it was decided to build
up a new Navy to deal with the new problems created
by the submarine and mine. And thus it happens that
this History embraces an account of the operations of the
Auxiliary Patrol, constituting one of the most remarkable
aspects of the war by sea.
Acknowledgment is made of the assistance rendered
by Lieutenant-Commander E. Keble Chatterton, R.N.V.R.,
in the preparation of this portion of the History. He was
viii PREFACE
associated with that phase of the war by sea for three
winters and three summers, and obtained first-hand
knowledge of the sterling work done by the merchant
seamen as belligerents in circumstances of much danger
and difficulty. With his aid, an attempt has been made
to convey an impression of the elaborate organisation
which was gradually created by the Admiralty, ultimately
comprising nearly 4,000 vessels, and of the high standard
of seamanship of officers and men.
Little has hithertb been revealed of the activities of
the Auxiliary Patrol. Now, with the advantage of official
records, the veil can be lifted arid particulars given of
some of the most stirring incidents of the war by sea. It
must be apparent that the story — a typical British story
of a fight against heavy odds — has been little more than
half told in the limited space available in this book.
The writing of this record of the ordeal of British mer-
chant seamen would have been impossible had it not been
for the cordial help received from officers of the Royal
Navy who, while serving at the Admiralty or elsewhere,
were brought into intimate association with the Merchant
Service, from the officials of the Marine Department of
the Board of TVade, of the Ministry of Shipping, and of
the Admiralty, from the Registrar-General of Shipping
and Seamen, and from many others, to whom acknow-
ledgment is made.
Full use has also been made of the records of the various
departments.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Mistaken conception of the Merchant Navy — Traditions and romance
Significance of sea power — Growth of the world's war fleets — Influence
of the steam-engine — Responsibilities of merchant shipping on the outbreak
of war . ...... pp. l — 7
CHAPTER I
THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST
I. THE FIGHTING MERCHANTMEN
The Cinque Ports and Home Defence — The Laws of Oleron — Merchant-
men at the Battle of Sluys — War and piracy — Issue of letters of marque —
Appointment of Admirals — The Merchant Adventurers — Sebastian Cabot —
English seamen in the Narrow Seas — The Hanseatic League — The founda-
tion of the Royal Navy — Elizabethan voyagers — Drake and the Spanish
Main — The defeat of the Spanish Armada — The " Adventurers for the
Discovery of the Trade of the East Indies " — The rivalry of the Dutch
pp. 8-44
II. THE MERCHANT FLEET IN THE REVOLUTIONARY AND NAPOLEONIC
WARS
Enemy's war on sea-borne commerce — Heavy losses of merchant
shipping — Successes of French corsairs — Unreadiness of the Channel
Fleet — Spirited defence by British merchant seamen — The risks of com-
merce in war time — Unwieldy British convoys — Man-power of the Merchant
Navy — The effect of impressment — The guerre de course after Trafalgar —
The fight of the Windsor Castle — The escape of the Shaw — The Antelope
and the Atlante — Consideration for prisoners — The value of Dunkirk,
Calais, Boulogne, and Dieppe — Raids on shipping in the English Channel —
British merchantmen captured, 1793-1812 . pp. 44—69
III. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MERCHANT NAVY, 1815-1914
The aftermath of the War — Prosperity and sea power — The influence
of the Navigation Laws and the movement for repeal — The competency
of masters and officers — Mr. Joseph Hume's agitation — Legislation to
promote safety at sea — The Foreign Office inquiry of 1843 — Mr. Samuel
Plimsoll and " coffin-ships " — The work of reform — Growth of the Merchant
Navy, 1818-74 — The rivalry of the United States — Effect of the Civil
War — Progress of ameliorative legislation — Responsibilities of the Board
of Trade — Strength of the British Mercantile Marine on the outbreak of
the War, 1914 — Liners and tramps— Expansion of the world's 'sea-borne
commerce — Distribution of the Merchant Fleet . . . pp. 70—97
x CONTENTS
IV. THE MEN OF THE MERCHANT NAVY
Changed relations of the Royal Navy and the Mercantile Marine —
Unpopularity of impressment — The Registry of seamen — Deterioration
of the personnel — Reports from British Consuls — Discreditable conditions
— Increase in the number of apprentices — A new scheme of registration
and its failure — Repeal of the Manning clauses of the Navigation Laws —
Establishment of a Voluntary Naval Reserve — A chequered history —
New scheme of training of the Royal Naval Reserve introduced in 1906 —
The country's resources in seamen . . pp. 97 — 116
CHAPTER II
ON THE EVE OF THE WAR
The position of the merchant seamen — Discussions at The Hague —
Germany's deceptive declarations — Professions of respect for the code of
humanity — Right of conversion on the high seas — The Admiralty's sus-
picions— A policy of defensive armament — Germany's varied resources
for a war on commerce — British merchant ships detained in German ports
before the outbreak of war — British protests — The enemy's Naval Prize
Code — The status of merchant seamen — The German declaration of July
22nd, 1914 — Merchant seamen as prisoners of war — The opening of
hostilities — Loss of the s.s. San Wilfrido . . .pp. 117 — 136
CHAPTER III
CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING
The KONIGSBERG'S attack on merchantmen — A British master's early
experiences — The DRESDEN as a commerce destroyer — Chase of the Pacific
Steam Navigation Company's s.s. Ortega — A fine exhibition of sea-
manship— Escape of the armed merchant cruiser KAISER WILHELM DER
GROSSE from the North Sea — Experiences of the officers and men of the
s.s. Galicia — Consideration for women and children — Operations of the
KARLSRUHE off Parnambuco — An enforced cruise — A British captain's
diary — A lucky escape — Misfortunes of a defensively armed merchantman
— The fate of the sailing-ship Wilfred M. — Capture of the armed merchant
cruiser KRONPRINZ WILHELM — Operations of the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH —
The sinking of the American s.s. William P. Frye — Capture of the s.s.
Elsinore by the LEIPZIG— Marooned on an island . . pp. 137—185
CHAPTER IV
THE EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN "
Captain von Miiller's resource and courtesy exaggerated — Record of
the EMDEN' s captures — Raid in the Bay of Bengal — A passenger's ex-
periences— A rich harvest — A British master's diary — The attack on the
CONTENTS xi
oil-tanks at Madras — Captain von Miiller's change of scene — Treatment
of British seamen — Escape of the s.s. Glenturret — Destruction of the
EMDEN — The gunboat GEIER'S only capture — Rescue of the s.s. Southport
A notable exploit — Total captures by enemy cruisers — No lives sacrificed
pp. 186—209
CHAPTER V
THE PROTECTION OF MERCHANT SHIPPING
I. STRATEGIC POLICY
The responsibilities of the Navy — The Royal Commission on the Supply
of Food and Raw Material in Time of War — Changes in naval conditions
owing to the introduction of steam — Command of the sea essential
Concentration of force the key to security — Losses of merchantmen
anticipated — Shipowners and the risks of war — An enemy's difficulties
Linking up the Admiralty and the Merchant Service — No fear of starva-
tion . . pp. 210—216
II. PRE-WAR ARRANGEMENTS
Action of the Committee of Imperial Defence — The basic principle of
British defensive policy — Oversea ports and their protection — The danger
of panics — Limitation of local defence — An enemy's probable policy —
Harbours of refuge — -The compilation of the War Book — Admiral of the
Fleet Sir Arthur Wilson's declaration — Influence of a policy of concentra-
tion of naval force ....... pp. 216 — 223
III. THE CREATION OF THE TRADE DIVISION OF THE WAR STAFF
A Royal Commission's recommendation ignored — A reversal of policy —
Captain Henry Campbell's Memorandum on an intelligence service for the
main trade routes — The creation of a Trade Division — Its growth and
organisation — Relations between the Admiralty and the Merchant Navy
pp. 224—228
IV. THE WAR INSURANCE SCHEME
Mr. Austen Chamberlain's Committee of 1907 — A fresh inquiry under-
taken in 1913 — Formation of Mutual Insurance Associations, or Clubs,
changes the situation — Government action and the avoidance of publicity —
Co-operation between the State and the Clubs suggested — Estimate of
probable losses — Basis of the value of shipping to be accepted — Proposals
for the insurance of cargoes — " An administratively practicable scheme " —
Prompt action on the outbreak of war .... pp. 228 — 239
V. ADMIRALTY DIRECTIONS TO SHIPPING
Communications opened with ships and shipowners — Co-operation of
other State departments — Counsels of weakness rejected — Merchant
shipping urged to continue its operations — A policy of dispersion of ship-
ping adopted — Why the convoy system was impracticable — Early in-
structions to merchant shipping — The " sea is free to all " — Re-establishing
xii CONTENTS
confidence amongst shipowners — An official review of the first two months
of the War — The opening of the New Year — Activities of the Operations
Division of the War Staff — Daily voyage notices to the Mercantile
Marine ... ... pp. 239—252
CHAPTER VI
THE ORGANISATION OF THE AUXILIARY PATROL
Scarcity of small craft for purposes of patrol — Influence of the sub-
marine and mine — Organisation of the New Navy — Lord Beresford's
foresight — Trawlers organised for war purposes — An Admiralty Com-
mittee appointed — The purchase of trawlers in 1910 — Manning policy —
Progress of recruiting — The mobilisation scheme — The trawler section on
the outbreak of war — A notable achievement . . . pp. 253 — 267
CHAPTER VII
THE APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE
Development of a new policy for attacking sea-borne commerce — The
sinking of the s.s. Glitra, the first merchant ship to be destroyed by a
submarine — The achievement of U2 1 in the English Channel — Germany's
decision to ignore international law and the code of humanity — Interview
with Grand Admiral von Tirpitz in December 1914 — Germany's declaration
of the War Zone on February 4th, 1915 — The reply of the British Govern-
ment— The attack on the s.s. Laertes — The British seamen's ordeal —
Enemy threats treated with contempt — The rising toll of lives lost —
Merchant ships attacked by aeroplanes — Vessels torpedoed without
warning — The escape of the s.s. Vosges — The s.s. Faldba torpedoed and sunk
— A court of inquiry — The tragedy of the s.s. Fulgent . pp. 268—317
CHAPTER VIII
THE AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK
Mine-laying by the Germans — Operations of British mine-sweepers —
Maintaining a swept channel — The needs of the Grand Fleet — Trawlers
in a new role — Steam-yachts requisitioned — The Motor-Boat Reserve —
Clearing three German minefields — The menace of the submarine — An
anti-submarine trawler flotilla — Protecting merchant shipping — A new
naval command at Dover — Hunting for submarines — Expansion of the
mine-sweeping service — Escape of the Norddeutscher Lloyd liner Berlin —
A minefield laid off Tory Island — Foundering of H.M.S. AUDACIOUS —
Impressment of Liverpool tugs as patrols — Exploration of a new mine-
field— The Gorleston raid — Activity in the English Channel — U18 sunk
by a trawler — Incursions into Scapa Flow — The raid on Scarborough
pp. 318—366
CONTENTS xiii
CHAPTER IX
THE GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE
The enemy's dependence on the mine and submarine — An attack upon
the Grand Fleet — Additional armed trawlers fitted out — The development
of the " indicator net " — An extended scheme of patrol introduced — The
nucleus of the drifter fleet — Submarine attack off the Mersey — Reor-
ganisation of the patrol area — The war zone declaration and its influence
on the patrol — Netting the Straits of Dover — Destruction of a submarine
by the steam trawler Alex Hastie — Encounters with submarines — The
value of the modified sweep — The fighting spirit of the British crews —
The enemy's reply to the indicator net — Loss of fishing- vessels and crews —
Protective measures devised by the Admiralty — Further changes in the
Auxiliary Patrol — The discovery of an enemy minefield . pp. 367 — 409
CHAPTER X
THE SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA "
The " Blue Ribbon of the Atlantic " — Enemy warning of an attack on
the Lusitania ignored by passengers— An unarmed ship, with 1,959 people
on board — Lord Mersey's judgment supported by an American judge —
The cross- Atlantic voyage — Warnings from the Admiralty as to the
presence of submarines off the Irish coast — Captain Turner's decision—
The enemy's attack without warning — A passenger's experience— Scene
on board the doomed ship — Heroic conduct of an able seaman — The first
officer's exertions to save life — Captain Turner's explanation — The official
inquiry and judgment — Reception of the news in Germany pp. 410—428
CHAPTER XI
THE ADVENT OF THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE
The concentration of enemy craft off the Irish coast to attack the
Lusitania— The disposition of patrol vessels— The S.O.S. signal and the
response — Rescue of the survivors— Fine service of unarmed fishing-
vessels — Increasing constriction on the enemy's movement owing to the
activity of the patrol— A well-devised scheme— The introduction of the
hydrophone— The fighting spirit of the new Navy— Entrapping the
submarine— The harvest of the sea— Trawler sea-fights— A submarine's
cowardly action— Destruction of the U-boat— Rescue of a merchant ship
and a valuable cargo . • • • PP- 429-
INDEX • PP. 451-473
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PACING PAGE
AFTER A MINE EXPLOSION ..... 134
THE SINKING or A MERCHANT SHIP . . . .146
THE WHITE STAR LINER " OLYMPIC " (FROM THE AIR) 202
SURVIVORS FROM A TORPEDOED SHIP .... 270
A DRIFTER FLEET AT SEA ..... 320
FLAGSHIP OF A DRIFTER FLEET .... 330
A DRIFTER ON PATROL 358
NET MINES BEING THROWN OVERBOARD . . . 374
THROWING A LANCE-BOMB ...... 392
THE CUNARD LINER " LUSITANIA " OFF BROW HEAD . 416
GRAVE OF VICTIMS OF THE " LUSITANIA " AT QUEENSTOWN 426
LAYING NETS FROM DRIFTERS TO CATCH SUBMARINES . 438
MAPS
THE WORLD. SHOWING THE VOLUME AND DISTRIBU-
TION OF BRITISH TRADE AND THE SCHEME OF
CRUISER PROTECTION FOR THE TRADE ROUTES At end of took.
EUROPEAN WATERS. SHOWING THE VOLUME AND
DISTRIBUTION OF BRITISH TRADE . . . „
BRITISH ISLANDS, NORTH SEA AND BALTIC EN-
TRANCE ,
XIV
THE
MERCHANT NAVY
INTRODUCTION
A HISTORY of the part which merchant seamen took in
the war by sea, from its dramatic opening on August 4th,
1914, to its close over four and a half years later, would
be incomplete were no attempt made to fill in the back-
ground against which the stirring events of those years
must stand out in due perspective. Without such an
historic setting it would be difficult to appreciate the
character and extent of the services which British seamen,
non-combatants and unpledged to the State, rendered
with fine patriotism, never-failing resource, and a hardi-
hood unparalleled even in British annals.
During the long period of peace after the conclusion
of the Napoleonic War, the British Merchant Navy was
regarded as a trading organisation — that and nothing
more. The authority which the State had exercised in
the past had been in general of two kinds — protective and
economic. Throughout the latter half of the nineteenth
and the first decade of the twentieth century, it tended
to interest itself increasingly in shipping, and especially
to regulate it more closely in the interest of the persons
(passengers and crews) carried in the ships, with a view
to safeguarding life. The restricted powers formerly
vested in the Admiralty were transferred to the Board
of Trade and exercised by that department, overburdened
with many and varied responsibilities, with sagacity and
restraint, the aim being to discourage as little as possible
the individualistic enterprise of the shipping industry.
It was forgotten by the British people that the British
Merchant Navy had a war history dating back to a period
anterior to the founding of the Royal Navy. No one
l
2 INTRODUCTION [INTRO.
recalled the part which merchant seamen had borne in
former wars, or remembered that in earlier periods of
British history the merchant sailor had stood between
this country and the invader when little or no progress
had been made in the organisation of a fighting Navy as
a State institution. The Merchant Navy was thought to
be an organisation without traditions and with little
remaining romance, owing to the advent of steam, which
had replaced sail power. That was a narrow and mistaken
view, as events were to show. Just as in the great period
of the nation's expanding self-consciousness the Merchant
Navy was the finest embodiment of the national spirit,
so when the war clouds burst in the summer of 1914, the
real character of the British merchant seamen was re-
vealed as the flash of artillery lit up the battle-fields on
the Continent of Europe. These sailors were recognised as
no ordinary men engaged merely in facilitating the barter
and exchange of a commercial community, but as belong-
ing to a great brotherhood, instinct with patriotism and
proud of the traditions dating back, in unbroken and
glorious sequence, to the early years of British history.
When the present struggle began, two great national
forces, the Navy and the Army — the latter supported by
Territorials — were recognised, and supported out of public
funds. Within a few months of the opening of hostilities,
the King, in a message of appreciation of the services
of the merchant seamen, referred to " his Merchant Navy,"
subsequently appointing Captain H. J. Haddock, C.B.,
one of the most distinguished senior officers of the
Mercantile Marine, as an aide-de-camp, and the Prime
Minister, in a self- revealing phrase, described the Merchant
Navy as " the jugular vein of the nation." Its
officers and men in a short time set up a record of
daring, resource, and fine seamanship, so conspicuous,
even when studied against the background of past cen-
turies, that it was necessary to amend the statutes and
introduce new regulations in order to enable suitable
recognition to be given to them. The merchant sailor,
unassuming and modest, took his stand, with the full
recognition of an aroused and grateful public opinion,
beside the men of the ancient fighting services.
During the years of fierce naval competition which
preceded the War, when the talk was of Dreadnoughts, sea
INTRO.] MODERN SEA POWER 3
power was thought to be a matter of men-of-war — battle-
ships, cruisers, destroyers, and submarines — organised in
fleets, squadrons, or flotillas, and manned by highly
trained officers and men. So long as the country possessed
a supreme Navy, any other deficiency was of minor im-
portance. The relationship between the Royal Navy
and the Mercantile Marine had undergone a radical change
since the close of the last Great War, to be reflected in the
public attitude towards the Merchant Fleet. The former
had become independent of the latter as a source of man-
power, owing to the introduction of a system of continuous
naval service in the middle of the nineteenth century. It
was concluded that, since the necessity of compulsory
service had disappeared, the value of the Merchant Fleet
as an auxiliary force in time of war had been reduced,
though its place as a food-carrier from distant markets was
realised by open-eyed statesmen. Mahan, fresh from the
study of naval history, had made, it is true, a significant
declaration. " Sea power," he remarked, " primarily
depends upon commerce which follows the most advan-
tageous road ; military control follows upon trade for its
furtherance and protection. Except as a system of
highways joining country to country, the sea is an un-
fruitful possession. The sea, or water, is the great medium
of circulation established by Nature, just as money has
been evolved by man for the exchange of commerce.
Change the flow of either in direction or amount, and you
modify the political and industrial relations of mankind." l
This writer was groping after a truth, but even he was
blind to the essential character of the functions of a
merchant navy, or, rather, did not associate cause with
effect. He and other writers, in common with Govern-
ments throughout the world, failed to trace the wide
influence exerted, on the one hand, by conscription for
military purposes, and, on the other, by the introduction
of steam as the motive power for men-of-war.
When Napoleon decided to make a levy on the population
of France in order to raise a vast army which was to domin-
ate Europe, he laid the foundations of a system which
rendered a long war in future years impossible except
with the aid of sea carriage. Before that development,
armies and navies made relatively small demands upon
1 Naval Strategy (Mahan).
4 INTRODUCTION [INTRO.
the man-power of the nations engaged, and those nations
were in large measure self-supporting. Europe had had its
Hundred Years' War. Maritime commerce was still in
its infancy during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic
Wars. The Continent of Europe was engaged in hostilities
almost without interruption for a period of nearly a
quarter of a century without being brought to a condition
of famine, so great were its resources. Between 1815 and
1914, however, the standard of living in Western Europe
had been raised ; industrialism had grown at the expense
of agriculture ; and increasing reliance had been placed
upon the ship of commerce, acting as the link between
the highly developed nations of the West and the States
overseas, which still continue to produce a surplus of
food-stuffs and raw materials.
In war-time conscription, as the late struggle was to
reveal, withdraws from essential industries all the able-
bodied men of a State ; it blights agriculture and depresses
trade ; it converts producers into consumers. Moltke,
after the Franco-Prussian War, admitted that long-drawn-
out contests would in future be checked by the economic
exhaustion which wars on the scale of national man-power
would involve, since, from the moment such a struggle
opened, a State, in developing fighting energy on a broad
national basis, would begin subtracting from its economic
strength. But in this respect, as German writers were
among the first to recognise, a maritime Power necessarily
enjoys advantages over a land Power, so long as it is able
to use the pathways of the sea to replenish its supplies of
food and raw material from neutral markets. Conscription
casts fresh burdens on sea power, and, in particular,
on that form of sea power represented by the ship of
commerce.
But that is not the only change which occurred during
the nineteenth century. The great development of
military power on shore was accompanied by a vast
growth of military strength by sea. Owing to the advent
of steam, the typical man-of-war of the Nelsonian era
disappeared, and was replaced by the coal or oil consuming
vessel. Mahan l remarked, long before the Great War
opened, that, " The days when fleets lay becalmed are
gone, it is true ; but gone are the days when, with four or
1 Naval Strategy (Mahan).
INTRO.] NEW WAR CONDITIONS 5
five months of food and water below, they were ready to
follow the enemy to the other side of the world without
stopping. Nelson, in 1803-5, had always on board
three months' provisions and water, and aimed to have
five months' — that is, to be independent of communications
for nearly five months. If it is sought to lessen the strategic
difficulty by carrying more coal, there is introduced the
technical drawback of greater draught, with consequent
lower speed and more sluggish handling, a still more
important consideration. The experience of Admiral
Rodjestvensky in this matter is recent and instructive.
His difficulties of supply, and chiefly of coal, are known :
the most striking consequence is the inconsiderate manner
in which, without necessity, he stuffed his vessels with
coal for the last run of barely a thousand miles. That he
did this can be attributed reasonably only to the impression
produced upon his mind by his coaling difficulties, for the
evident consequence of this injudicious action was to put
his ships in bad condition for a battle which he knew was
almost inevitable." Those words indicate that the Ameri-
can historian was approaching a realisation of the changes
which had occurred in the character of naval power,
rendering it dependent on auxiliaries for food, ammunition,
and stores ; but, on the other hand, he under-estimated
the extent to which the ship of commerce loaded with coal
and operating with the ship of war engaged in attacking
commerce, as in the case of the EMDEN and other enemy
cruisers, could provide a measure of compensation for the
restrictions on naval warfare traceable to the development
of the swift-running steam-engine with its enormous con-
sumption of fuel.
All those considerations were inadequately recognised
before the War opened in 1914, which was at last to involve
in its horrors, directly or indirectly, practically all the
nations of the Continent of Europe, was later on to draw
in Japan and China, and at last to bring the United States
and other American Republics into the arena. Even
Mahan did not go farther than to suggest that " a broad
basis of mercantile maritime interests will doubtless con-
duce to naval efficiency by supplying a reserve of material
and personnel." Events were to show that his anticipation
of reliance being placed upon the Mercantile Marine for
men to anything like the same extent as during the wars
6 INTRODUCTION [INTRO.
of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was based upon
an under-appreciation of the varied responsibilities de-
volving upon a merchant navy as soon as the maritime
State whose flag it carries becomes engaged in warfare.
The books of British writers upon war policy may be
studied in vain for a just appreciation of the essential part
which the British Mercantile Marine necessarily assumed
as soon as this country become involved in varied war
activities overseas.
Soon after the declaration of war, the British Mercantile
Navy was confronted with responsibilities which in character
and extent were without parallel in maritime history.
1. Owing to circumstances which need not be examined
in this connection, the Royal Navy was without defended
bases of supply on the east coast vis-d-vis to Germany.
Consequently, as soon as the Grand Fleet was mobilised,
heavy demands were made upon the Mercantile Marine
for ships to carry fuel (coal and oil), ammunition, stores,
food, and everything required for the prosecution of the
war in home waters. At the same time, other ships were
requisitioned for the support of naval power in the outer
seas.
2. The resources of the Royal Navy — large as they
were — proved inadequate to maintain the patrol which
it became necessary to organise in order to make the
blockade of the enemy effective. Some of the swiftest
liners were, therefore, taken up and commissioned under
the White Ensign, and from the varied resources of the
Merchant Navy the Auxiliary Patrol was organised.
3. As the military commitments of the country in-
creased, a large volume of mercantile tonnage was required
for transport purposes. Transport facilities had to' be pro-
vided for the Gallipoli Expedition, the army at Salonika,
the forces based on Egypt, the operations in Mesopotamia
and Palestine, and the campaign in East Africa. Shipping
was also requisitioned for the troops engaged in routing
the Germans out of their Pacific possessions, and other
ships were employed in maintaining the military lines of
communication between the mother-country and India,
New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Canada, and
Newfoundland. Hospital carriers had to be fitted out.
4. Storeships had to be found for the growing armies
INTRO.] AN HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 7
engaged in all the widely separated theatres of war to
carry the vast assortment of material ranging from heavy
guns and horses to bomb-throwers and medical comforts.
5. As the British Army grew in size, a vast expansion
occurred in the munition movement in the British Isles,
in India, and in Canada, as well as in the United States,
and a large number of ships were soon engaged exclusively
in conveying ores and other raw materials over the seas.
6. At the same time, the sea-dependent people of the
British Isles, numbering over forty million persons, had to
be fed, and, owing to the isolation of Russia with its surplus
grain production, the cutting off of beet sugar from
Germany, and the dangers which threatened navigation
between the British Isles and Scandinavia, new sources
of supply had to be opened up, involving longer voyages,
and therefore the employment of a larger amount of
tonnage.
It was a fortunate circumstance that this country
possessed about half the merchant shipping of the world ;
otherwise it would have been seriously hampered in the
prosecution of the War. It is also a fortunate circumstance
that its merchant ships possessed officers and crews who
were not to be frightened by the enemy threats or acts.
The British Navy has never wanted historians ; its
history has been written from every standpoint ; but the
historian to give full credit to the British Merchant Navy,
with its fine achievements in peace and in war, has not yet
arisen. In approaching the study of the part taken by
the Merchant Navy in the Great War, it has been thought
pardonable to supply a background, consisting of a short
survey of the place which British merchant seamen have
filled in the evolution of the British people, a brief record
of the heroic services they have rendered in successive
wars, and particularly in the Revolutionary and Na-
poleonic Wars, and some details of the gradual develop-
ment of the Mercantile Marine during the nineteenth
century. A contrast may thus be provided between the
conditions existing in former wars and those with which
the British seaman, unarmed and undefended, was con-
fronted when, in performance of his peaceful duty, he was
suddenly called upon to meet the menace of the raider, the
mine, and, above all, the submarine.
CHAPTER I
THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST
I. THE FIGHTING MERCHANTMEN
OF all the lessons taught to the inhabitants of these
islands by the Great War, none can have been more com-
pletely mastered than this — that they owe their very
existence to the two branches of the great Sea service — the
Mercantile Marine bringing them the bulk of their supplies,
and the Royal Navy, the " sure shield " of that vital
traffic as well as of the homeland itself. Viewed in the
light of this immense debt of gratitude, the two branches
are seen to be essentially one, the fighting arm but an
extension of the Mercantile Marine ; and the modern
separation of functions takes its proper place as a natural
evolution from the days when our sea battles were fought
by vessels temporarily converted from merchantmen to
men-of-war. That condition did not mark in any degree
the centuries which immediately followed the Roman
occupation. Sunk in internecine strife, and the prey to
successive piratical invasions, England had then no
effective share in the sea-borne commerce of which the
Mediterranean was the secular home ; and in constructing
and maintaining the Fleet which has given him such a
high place in our naval history, King Alfred was dealing
with a simple though formidable problem of invasion,
and, taking an accurate strategical view of the situation, he
placed his first line of defence off his coasts. His policy
was vigorously carried on by Athelstan, and though from
time to time merchant shipping was drawn upon by the
Saxon kings for their war fleets, it may be said generally
that the basis of the navies of these troublous centuries
was essentially a military one. The change came with
the return to greater national security, and the consequent
growth of maritime enterprise, and the incorporation of
8
CH. i] SEAMEN OF THE CINQUE PORTS 9
the famous Cinque Ports by the Conqueror — a step directly
due to the fear of a Danish invasion — may conveniently
be taken as inaugurating the unity of the two branches
of the sea service.
Upon the seamen of the Cinque Ports — Dover, Sandwich,
Romney, Winchelsea and Rye (the list was extended
later) — were conferred certain unique commercial and
maritime privileges on condition of their raising a powerful
force of fifty-seven ships properly manned and equipped
for use in any sudden emergency. The period of service
(fifteen days) could be extended at the King's pleasure,
but in such event the cost was to be borne by the Royal
Treasury. The fleet thus created was actively maintained
by William Rufus, and it contributed its full share to the
great expedition undertaken by Richard I to recover the
Holy Land from the Saracens. In this enterprise over
200 merchant vessels were enrolled for the task of trans-
porting the Crusaders ; and, disastrous as it proved in some
respects, the expedition had notable consequences for the
country's maritime progress. In the critical days which
followed the death of King John, the Cinque Ports Fleet
covered itself with immortal glory by the prominent part
it took in the defeat of the French Armada dispatched
from Calais under Eustace the Monk. Responding to the
patriotic appeal of Hubert de Burgh, the stout sailors and
fishermen of Dover manned all the vessels, large and
small, lying in the harbour, and, having taken the knights
and men-at-arms on board, sailed out to meet the enemy.
The battle, as recorded by Matthew Paris, took place off
Sandwich. The English sailors proved their better sea-
manship by getting the weather gauge, and when the
cross-bowmen and archers had discharged their arrows
under these favourable conditions and quick-lime had
been thrown at close quarters, the Frenchmen were rammed
and boarded. Such a picture presents the mariners of
the southern ports in the most favourable colours. Their
brilliant share in the exploit won them a generous ex-
tension of their already existing rights, but it has to be
admitted that the position of the seamen of the Cinque
Ports as a privileged class was productive of many evils
which must be set off against their great services to the
nation. The privilege now conferred upon them — in itself
a foreshadowing of the custom of issuing Letters of Marque
10 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
— of annoying " the subjects of France and all they met
of whatever nation," simply meant the right to plunder
any and every foreign merchant ship. The example found
so many imitators that before long the Channel was swarm-
ing with pirates, the strong preying on the weak, " until
the evil had grown to such an enormous extent that the
most stringent measures were found necessary to sweep the
seas of the marauders." 1 Moreover, the Cinque Ports were
not free from the jealousy characteristic of a privileged class,
and feuds with other ports, and notably with Yarmouth,
broke out again and again, often marked by savage energy.
We get a picturesque hint of the beginnings of maritime
enterprise under the Saxon kings in Athelstan's grant of
the rank and privileges of Thane to any merchant or
mariner who should successfully accomplish three voyages
on the high seas ; but for long after the Conquest the limits
of British overseas trade appear to have been the entrance
to the Baltic in the north and the ports of the Bay of
Biscay to the south, nor did our wool trade with Flanders
reach its high prosperity till a later date. Richard's last
crusade, therefore, has a special significance as the first
extended voyage of English ships, and it furnished results
far removed from its idealistic purposes. For the first
time since the Roman occupation the English now entered
into trade relations with the Levant (though English ships
did not penetrate there till much later) ; and not only was
a new stimulus applied to the growth of English shipping,
but the attempt was made to codify by regular enactment
the rules of the sea.
The famous Laws of Oleron, generally attributed to
Richard himself,8 but almost certainly derived from a
French source, are of great interest for the light they
throw on life on board the sea-going merchant ship of the
period. The articles covered all matters relating to
mercantile shipping — questions of total loss, damage,
demurrage, harbour regulation, fishing, and the like — and
in particular defined for the first time the duties and
qualifications of the Master of the ship. The Master was
put in charge of, and held answerable for, everything on
board, and he was required to understand thoroughly the
1 The British Merchant Service (Cornewall Jones).
2 For a full discussion of this question, see The Black Book of the
Admiralty, in the edition of Sir Travers Twiss.
CH. i] MEDIAEVAL REGULATIONS 11
art of navigating his vessel, for the specific reason that he
might thereby control the pilot, who was the Second Officer
on board a merchantman. Nor could any sailor leave the
ship without his consent. Navigation in the days before
the compass was largely a matter of practical experience,
and of this fact the second article of the Code affords a
striking illustration ; for it was there laid down that if a
vessel was delayed in port by unfavourable weather, or
by the failure of the wind, the Master had to call the ship's
company together, and take their opinion on the situation,
and in the event of a division of opinion he was to abide
by the voice of the majority. This rule, in fact, applied
to every emergency by which the Master might be con-
fronted. It is interesting to note that such a regulation
in a modified form remained in active force for centuries ;
indeed, one of the charges brought by his detractors against
Sir Francis Drake in the period of his great voyages was
that, by his attitude towards his officers, he had on occasion
treated this obligation with contempt. But Drake, a giant
among sea captains and self-reliant to his finger-tips, was
a law unto himself in such matters. Here, surely, in this
thirteenth- century code we perceive the beginnings of that
spirit of freedom under discipline which has become
traditional in the Mercantile Marine, a spirit which found
such rich expression in Elizabethan times, and helped to
make the British the first seamen of the world.
The same principle, born as it were of the breath of the
sea, is traceable in the article defining with amusing
particularity the relations of the Master with the crew.
It was the Master's duty to keep peace among his men.
If one called another a liar at table, he was to be fined
fourpence, but if the Master himself so offended he was
mulcted in twice the amount. For impudently contradict-
ing the Master, a seaman was fined eightpence. A single
blow from the Master was to be accepted by a sailor
without retaliation, but a second blow gave him the right
to defend himself. On the other hand, if a sailor struck
the first blow, he was either to pay a heavy fine or lose his
hand. Finally, if a sailor received abuse from the Master,
he was advised to hide himself in the forecastle ; but if the
Master followed him into that retreat— the Englishman's
house at sea in the proverbial sense of his castle — then the
victim was entitled to stand on his defence.
12 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
This significant recognition of the rights of the common
sailor went hand-in-hand with strict discipline, and order
and good conduct were maintained with mediaeval severity.
Damage to the ship due to a sailor's absence without leave
was punishable with a year's imprisonment ; a fatal
accident due to the same cause involved a flogging — a
flogging of the period — and actual desertion meant branding
in the face with a red-hot iron. Other offences, including
such human weaknesses as swearing and gambling, often
incurred brutal penalties in the Middle Ages, and the punish-
ment of keel-hauling, which seems to have been first practised
by the English in the twelfth century, survived into modern
times, as we know from the pages of Captain Marry att.
By the Oleron Code, a defaulting pilot — the navigating
officer of the time — was allotted treatment in full pro-
portion to the responsibility of his task. If through his
ignorance his vessel miscarried in entering a port, and if
he were unable to render full satisfaction for the damage
or loss, then he paid for the mishap with his head ; and if
the Master or the merchants on board chose to exact the
penalty there and then, they were not to be called on to
answer it in law. Furthermore, any pilot who, in con-
nivance with the " lords of the coast," ran his ship on
shore, was to be hanged on a high gibbet at the place of
destruction, as a caution to other vessels that might pass
thereby. Against any " lord of the coast " involved in
such a crime drastic measures were laid down. His goods
were to be confiscated by way of restitution, while he
himself was to be fastened to a stake in the midst of his
mansion and the whole building committed to the flames.
In the Middle Ages wreckers infested the shores, and the
sense of this ever-present menace to shipping is fully
expressed in the severe treatment reserved for those who
plundered a ship or murdered castaway mariners. They
were to be " plunged into the sea till they were half dead,
and then drawn out from the sea and stoned to death."
A notable example of the common practice of the impress-
ment of sailors occurred in the following reign at a time
when King John was preparing an expedition to Ireland.
For the transport of the soldiers, the seamen of Wales were
ordered to repair to Ilfracombe on pain of hanging and
forfeiture of goods. This power of the Crown was con-
tinuously exercised up to the beginning of the nineteenth
CH. i] BATTLE OF SLUYS 13
century. Though never a statutory right, and occasionally
challenged as an illegality, it is implied in numerous
statutes, and was judicially regarded as a part of the
Common Law of the Realm.
Like the fight off Sandwich of 1217, the Battle of Sluys,
early in the reign of Edward III, was a triumph for the
merchantmen of England. The French King's fleet, largely
composed of Norman ships, reinforced by a Genoese
squadron, were massed in the harbour at the entrance to
the canal leading to the great mart of Bruges — so vast in
numbers, says Froissart, that " their masts seemed to be
like a great wood." King Edward attacked with a fleet
drawn from the various ports of the kingdom, and carrying
a large force of archers and men-at-arms. A fierce struggle,
lasting all day and renewed the following morning, ended
in a complete victory, with capture or destruction of nearly
all the French vessels, though the Genoese mercenaries
escaped in the night. The Harleian MSS. have preserved
for us the list of the Armada with which, six years later,
the King blockaded Calais. Exclusive of those of
" forrayne Countreyes in this Ayde," the roll shows a total
of 707 vessels, and of that number only twenty-five were
King's ships. The detailed list is of great interest, also, as an
indication of the relative prominence of the different mari-
time towns. The famous Cinque Ports, their harbours
already i beginning to silt up, were far out-distanced by the
West Country. Sandwich, Winchelsea, Dover, Rye, and
Hythe, together muster an average of fifteen ships each,
but Fowey — a place of little importance to-day, but then a
centre of the tin industry — sent 47 ; Dartmouth — whence
Chaucer's shipman haled — 32 ; Plymouth, 26 ; Bristol, 22 ;
and Looe, 20. On the other hand, the modern Welsh
ports of Cardiff and Swansea were represented by only one
ship each, and Liverpool did not even appear in the tally.
The Battle of Sluys marked the beginning of that
exhausting attempt at Continental conquest known as the
Hundred Years' War, itself followed by the devastating
civil strife of the Wars of the Roses. The long struggle
with France interrupted trade and checked maritime
enterprise, though it helped powerfully to evoke a new
spirit of national consciousness at a time when municipal
institutions were beginning to decay and our mercantile
policy was undergoing a drastic change. Apart from the
14 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
ravaging of seaports by the enemy — those on the south
coast being special sufferers l — the country's shipping was
continually being diverted from its normal purposes by
the military requirements of the Sovereign. In his
great invasion of France in 1415, Henry V sailed from
Southampton with a vast fleet of 1,400 vessels, having
previously impressed all the craft in the country of 20 tons
and upwards, and obtained his crews largely by similar
methods. Brilliant as the adventure was in its temporary
achievements, one is apt to overlook the enormous strain
it placed on the economic resources of the kingdom, and
to forget such contemporary protests as the humble
petition of Parliament representing that the conquest of
France would be the ruin of England.
Furthermore, the almost continuous state of war, foreign
and civil, intensified the lawlessness which had so long
prevailed at sea. The complex problem presented by
mediaeval piracy baffled the efforts of even the most
statesmanlike rulers. Sea-trading in those days was
anything but a peaceful occupation. Professional pirates,
whether individual ships or organised gangs like the Rovers
of the Sea, whose activities at Scarborough anticipated
the modern revival of unrestrained piracy, infested the
Channel and the North Sea, adding their depredations to
those of enemy craft ; and these marauders carried their
daring to the extent of harrying the coast and burning
seaside towns. At one time, the Isle of Wight was virtually
in the possession of a certain John of Newport, whose
misdeeds and " riot kept uppon the see " were the theme
of a plaintive petition to Parliament.
But apart from sheer plundering, though not always
distinguishable from it, was the system of legalised priva-
teering arising out of the issue of Letters of Marque. By
the licence thus obtained from the Crown, a trader who
had been the victim of foreign aggression, or who sought
the means of collecting a difficult debt, was given the right
of reprisals on the goods of the community or country to
which the offender belonged. The first recorded instance
of such a grant occurs in the reign of Edward I, though it
cannot safely be assumed that none was issued earlier. It
1 The activity of the Norman corsairs in the early years of Edward Ill's
reign was so effective that an order was issued directing dwellers on the
south coast to take refuge in fortresses and withdraw their goods a distance
of four leagues from the sea. (Pol. Hist, of England, vol. iii, p. 334.)
CH. i] LETTERS OF MARQUE 15
was made in favour of the English owner of a ship which,
while bringing fruit from Malaga, was piratically seized
off the coast of Portugal and carried as a prize into Lisbon.
In this case, the licence to seize the goods of the Portuguese
to the extent of the loss sustained was limited to five years.
The disadvantages of such a rough-and-ready method of
adjusting differences need no great emphasis. In the first
place, experience showed that licence for reprisals tended
to degenerate into licence of a more general -kind ; and,
secondly, this method of making innocent Peter pay for
guilty Paul often acted as a serious deterrent upon trading.
In the British Museum may be seen a gold noble coined
by Edward III after the taking of Calais had given him
the command of the Channel. On the reverse it depicts
a ship and a sword, and it possesses a peculiar interest as
the symbol of the first claim by an English King to the
sovereignty of the sea. In formally adopting the title of
Dominus Maris Anglicani Circumquaque, this clear-sighted
ruler was laying claim to no empty formula, but to a real
sovereignty involving a number of substantial rights —
such as those of fishing, the levying of tolls for the use of
the sea, free passage for ships-of-war, and, lastly, juris-
diction for crimes committed at sea. It was therefore by
the active assertion of this claim that Edward sought to
deal with the growing practice of piracy and give protection
at sea. His practical measures included the granting to
merchant vessels of letters of safe-conduct and the or-
ganising of fleets in convoy. Vessels bound for Gascony,
for instance, were directed to assemble on the day of the
Nativity of the Virgin outside Southampton Water,1
sailing thence under the charge of Royal officials. The
main effect, however, of the first-mentioned remedy seems,
in later times, to have aggravated the evil, for under the
Lancastrian Kings we get many complaints of the forging
of such documents ; and, moreover, it was found by the
men on the English coasts that the issue of letters of
safe- conduct prevented them from getting redress for
pillage by taking the matter into their own hands. In
short, the efforts of Edward III had little or no effect in
giving protection on the seas. So it was with his successors.
In the next reign, letters of marque were granted more
1 " Chalcheford " in the original, which, according to Dr. Cunningham,
was probably Calshot Castle.
16 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
freely than ever, and it is recorded of one of the merchants
of Dartmouth, a port which held a general privateering
commission from the Crown, that with a fleet of his own
he captured no fewer than thirty-three vessels with 1,500
tuns of Rochelle wine.
Apart from its more direct results, the long period of
wars, by its consumption of the national energies, offered
an opportunity to foreign rivals which they were quick
to seize. The Hanseatic League had become the most
important commercial association of the world at the
beginning of the fourteenth century ; Bruges and Antwerp
had established themselves as the great entrepots of
Northern Europe, and the merchant vessels of the Italian
Republics were frequenting the markets of the Nether-
lands. To these several rivals fell, during the war, the
bulk of the English carrying trade. Another cause
operating against the interests of the English shipper was
the commercial policy carried out by Edward III. His
broad aims may be summed up as a combination of cheap
imports for the benefit of the consumer, with high prices
for exports as a means of providing revenue through the
Customs ; and those aims were apparent in the regulations
affecting wool and wine, and the liberal provisions for
encouraging the foreign trader. A few years after Ed-
ward's death saw the start of a reversal of this policy.
The increased resentment of English merchants against
the foreign trader, and the depressed condition of English
shipping, found expression in the first of many Navigation
Acts (1381), which provided that " to increase the Navy
of England,1 which is now greatly diminished, it is assented
and accorded that none of the King's liege people do from
henceforth ship any merchandise in going or coming
within the realm of England in any port, but only in ships
of the King's liegance." So diminished, indeed, was " the
Navy " that in the following year the new ordinance had
to be modified, owing to an insufficiency of shipping.
Taken in conjunction with the new regulations for keeping
bullion in the country, and the protective encouragement
of tillage, not merely as a means of safeguarding the food-
supply, but for the fostering of the country's military
strength, the Navigation Act marks the beginning of a
drastic change of mercantile policy — a change, in a happy
1 That is to say, the general shipping of the kingdom.
CH. i] COAST PROTECTION BY CONTRACT 17
phrase Bacon applies to the policy of the first Tudor King,
" from consideration of plenty to consideration of power."
In spite, however, of the growth of national conscious-
ness, an effective means of providing for the due protection
of the country's coasts and shipping seemed for a time no
nearer. It was the plundering of English vessels by a daring
Scottish pirate early in the reign of Richard II, and the
ravaging of Rye and other south coast towns by a French
fleet, which induced Parliament, alarmed for the safety of
the realm, to pass the first law levying dues on all merchant
vessels (with a few exceptions) frequenting English ports,
for the specific purpose of maintaining an efficient Royal
Navy. But the fleet, no sooner created, was led by John
of Gaunt on the wild enterprise of the Siege of St. Malo,
instead of being employed in its proper service. And it
was a squadron of sturdy merchant ships which, in the
absence of the Royal fleet, and of its own initiative,
repelled a French marauding expedition. The usurper of
the following reign narrowly escaped capture by pirates
when coming up the Thames to London, and he was so
little able to achieve his aim of establishing a Royal Navy
that for a period of over a year the entire guardianship of
the coasts was entrusted to the country's merchantmen.
By this plan, which illustrates the general system of pro-
tection by contract, the shipowners were required to main-
tain certain ships on the sea, and to two " fit persons "
chosen from their body the King granted commissions to
act as his Admirals, one for the north and one for the south.
In recompense for these services they were empowered to
take three shillings on every cask of imported wine, as
well as certain dues on exports. It was the Crown's
complaint, subsequently, that the merchantmen had
failed to fulfil their part of the contract, and the scheme
came to nothing. A similar plan was tried, with no better
result, under Henry VI ; in that case the Commissioners
were the Earls of Salisbury, Shrewsbury, Worcester, and
Wiltshire, and Lord Sturton, who were assigned the grant
of tonnage and poundage on condition of " keeping the
seas " for three years. The significance of the maritime
efforts of Henry V's reign lies mainly in the improvements
in shipbuilding. Three ships turned out at Southampton
by the victor of Agincourt, on the models of three big
Genoese merchantmen which traded with that port, excited
18 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
the country's admiration; and examples of private enterprise
are found in the great carack built by John Taverner, of Hull,
and the fleet maintained by Bristol's merchant prince,
William Canynges, among which was a vessel of 900 tons
burden. It was owing to this advance in shipbuilding that,
later in the century, Englishmen found themselves with
vessels fit to take part in distant voyages of discovery.
It was in such conditions of turmoil as have been
described that our merchantmen in the Middle Ages not
only maintained and even extended their trade, but also,
as we have seen, provided the only means for the defence
and security of their country. In the light of their varied
record we clearly perceive that the mariners who won
wide renown in the days of Queen Elizabeth were but
carrying a step forward in the dawn of a new age the
traditions of their predecessors — " good felawes " of the
type so vividly presented by Chaucer's shipman. The
mariner of mediaeval England was an example of the
hardihood of his day. " Of nyce conscience took he no
keep," the Prologue tells us. "If that he fought and
hadde the hyer hond By water he sente hem hoom to
every lond." But he was " hardy " and " wys to under-
take," and again and again in the records of these centuries
we get proofs of that endurance and tenacity, that native
sea sense, that ready resource, which we have come to
regard as the birthright of the English seaman. When in
1378, as already mentioned, the King's ships were busy
besieging St. Malo, a squadron of French and Spanish
galleys seized the opportunity of sailing up the Kentish
coast and entering the mouth of the Thames, burning the
towns and villages on its banks as far as Graves end. On
returning by the Channel, however, intent on further
destruction, the marauders were met by a fleet of West
Country merchantmen and valiantly repulsed. The
English ships were of less tonnage than those of the enemy,
but boldness of attack and better seamanship prevailed,
as they have on so many historic occasions since. And
in the fifteenth century, in spite of conditions which often
approached to social anarchy, we get evidence of the slow
but real progress of maritime commerce fostered by the
new mercantile policy, which was still further developed
under the Tudor kings. The reign of Henry IV saw the
establishment of the Merchant Adventurers and similar
CH. i] THE AGE OF DISCOVERY 19
organisations of English merchants, trading to the Baltic
and to Prussia ; commercial treaties were common from
the reign of Edward IV onwards ; in 1480, the year of
the birth of the great Magellan, Bristol — then the most
enterprising seaport of England, its fishermen making
regular voyages to Iceland — dispatched an exploring
expedition in search of the " Island of Brazil " ; a score
of years later John Cabot, sailing from the same port, had
made two memorable voyages to the coast of Labrador,
and though he found no precious metals, reported, what
was far more significant, an abundance of cod-fish ; in
1485 there appeared at Pisa the first English Consul to be
appointed in the Mediterranean ; and the decline in power
of the Hanseatic League in this country, destined to be
extinguished finally under Queen Elizabeth, was rapidly
hastened. By the new consistency in her mercantile
policy, based on national consciousness, England was
steadily preparing to gather, by means of her merchantmen
of a later day, the fruits of the Age of Discovery.
When men were bidden by law to eat fish twice a week,
and throughout the whole of Lent, they were obeying an
obligation which it was believed the political needs of the
country imposed. Fish was, of course, an article of diet
of national importance, apart from the religious considera-
tions which entered into the matter. But the real sig-
nificance of the act was political. The buying of fish
stimulated the fishing industry, the fishing industry was
the best school for seamen, and seamen and shipping
were necessary for strengthening the country's power
against its rivals. Another essential of the national
ambition was wealth, and one avenue to wealth was already
being indicated by the great explorations of the last
decades of the century. The effects of the discovery of
America, of the rounding of the Cape by Vasco da Gama,
and later the accident of storm which gave Brazil to
Portugal, were as swift as revolutionary. The Levantine
trade with the East was ruined. For a time the Portuguese
became the first maritime Power. Lisbon established
itself as the great commercial depot for Western Europe.
In their desire for wealth, as a means of national power,
Tudor Englishmen turned their eyes to the New World
and to the looked-for promise of a north-west route to Far
Cathay. This sentiment found expression in 1511, in the
20 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
protest made by certain members of King Henry VIII's
Council against Continental conquest.1 If we would
enlarge ourselves, these statesmen argued,2 " let it be that
way we can, and to which it seems the eternal Providence
hath destined us, which is the sea. The Indies are dis-
covered, and vast treasure brought from thence every day.
Let us, therefore, bend our Endeavours thitherward, and
if the Spaniards or Portuguese suffer us not to join with
them, there will be yet region enough for all to enjoy."
Henry VIII himself gave effect to the prevalent ideas
of the time by endowing the country with its first Royal
Navy on an organised basis. But 'his establishment of the
Royal Navy as a regular department of the State was also
in accordance with the Tudor dynasty's principle of
personal power, and in idea it may be compared with the
tendency towards standing armies on the Continent. The
importance of Henry VIII's policy must be emphasised, for
here we have the beginnings of the differentiation between
the naval and mercantile services. A skilled amateur in
many arts and crafts, the King concerned himself personally
with improvement in construction, and his famous ship, the
GREAT HARRY, of at least 1,000 tons, was the largest vessel
then known. The first fleet which he secretly fitted out
at Portsmouth, small but admirably equipped, was specially
designed to deal with the French buccaneers who infested
the Channel, and it successfully disposed of a squadron
of marauders which had been plundering merchant craft
in Mounts Bay. The great fleet, assembled at Spithead
in his last war with France, was formed, as in the old days,
on a nucleus of the ships flying the Royal Standard, but
that nucleus organised, as indicated above, on definite
lines. Privateers joined the Admiral chiefly from the West
Country ports. At his death Henry left a fleet of over
seventy vessels ; but more important than that, he had
applied a new principle to national defence. Nor did his
scheme of organisation end with the provision of a Royal
fleet and its crews. As a means of protecting London
from pirates, he established two ports on the river at, and
opposite to, Gravesend, so that Londoners enjoyed an
1 This, it may be noted, was eight years after the Portuguese had tapped
the sources of the Venetians' Eastern trade and had brought their
first cargo of pepper to England.
3 Recorded in Lord Herbert of Cherbury's History.
CH. i] WILLOUGHBY'S ARCTIC VOYAGE 21
hitherto unknown security ; he founded a Naval Arsenal
at Deptford ; and there also he established the Fraternity
of the Holy Trinity, that since-famous body whose Tudor
Charter empowered it to frame " all and singular articles
in any wise concerning the science or art of mariners,"
and to make ordinances " for the relief, increase, and
augmentation of this our Realm of England." Nor could
we find clearer evidence of Parliament's recognition of the
national importance of the Mercantile Marine than in the
preamble of the Act passed in 1540 for the " maintenance
of the Navy." The dual purpose of the " Navy or multi-
tude of ships of this Realm " (the sense in which we now
use the word Navy has, of course, become more specialised)
is explicitly set forth — that is to say, first : " for the
intercourse and concourse of merchants, transporting and
conveying their wares and merchandise " ; and, secondly,
for " a great defence and surety of this Realm in time of war,
and also the maintenance of many master mariners and sea-
men." It went on to complain of the infringement of the ex-
isting laws against importing in foreign ships, re-enacted the
old Navigation Laws, and, among other provisions, arranged
for the publication in Lombard Street of notice of the sailings
of ships. Eight years later, Parliament passed the statute
imposing the sumptuary regulations as to the eating of
fish, to which allusion has already been made.
A significant event which followed the death of
Henry VIII was the return to Bristol of Sebastian Cabot,
who — whether or not he became, as Hakluyt says, " Grand
Pilot " of England — received, at any rate, the recognition
of a pension of 250 marks from Henry's youthful son and
successor, who was himself a keen student of geography.
It was Cabot who revived interest in the idea of a north-
east passage to China, and, having formed the Company of
Merchant Venturers to promote the scheme, he fitted out
an expedition under the command of Sir Hugh Willoughby,
with Richard Chancellor as Pilot-Major, which left the
Thames on the first organised voyage of Polar discovery
in 1553. All the famous explorer's skill and experience
lent themselves to the preparations for this great voyage.
Hakluyt tells us that " strong and well-seasoned planks
for the building of the requisite ships were provided," and
as a protection against the depredations of the worms
which " pearceth and eateth through the strongest oak,"
22 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
parts of the keels of the ship were covered " with thin
sheets of lead," which seems to be the first-recorded instance
of such sheathing in this country. The little flotilla bore
Royal Letters of Safe-Conduct, and the elaborate instruc-
tions drawn up for its government — an admirable document
characteristic of the period — suggest the sagacity and ripe
experience of Sebastian Cabot. The contemporary fame of
the voyage may be judged from the large concourse which,
amid the shooting-off of the ship's ordnance, bade the
expedition farewell on the river-shores of Greenwich.
The auspicious start — " a very triumph," says the
chronicler — was belied by speedy disaster. Violent
storms separated the ships, and Willoughby, with two
vessels, beaten out of his course and unable to make the
appointed rendezvous, remained to winter in Lapland ;
there, from cold, famine, and disease, he and all his men
miserably perished. Chancellor was more successful.
After waiting a few days at the rendezvous, he at length
passed through the uncharted seas to the Bay of St.
Nicholas, and landed at the spot near where the town of
Archangel now stands. He entered into friendly relations
with the natives, who were indeed " amazed at the strange
greatnesse of the shippe," and then, after gaining a smatter-
ing of the language, this astonishing seaman started on a
tour of the interior, which brought him finally to Moscow,
where Ivan the Terrible gave him a kindly reception. A
couple of years later, after vainly attempting to rescue
his missing companions, Chancellor returned to Moscow,
and succeeded so well in his negotiations that a Russian
Ambassador accompanied him on the return voyage, to
negotiate a treaty on liberal terms with the Association
of Merchant Venturers. His ship was wrecked in a gale
off the north of Scotland, and Chancellor lost his life in
an effort to save the Russian Ambassador. That func-
tionary, at any rate, escaped, and received an enthusiastic
welcome in London. Though a north-east passage to Far
Cathay 1 remained as much a dream as ever, Chancellor's
enterprise laid the foundations of British commerce in
Russia and the East. The new opening for overseas trade
was speedily followed up. Another merchant (Captain
1 The north-eastern passage from Europe to the Indies was not
achieved till the nineteenth century. In 1878-80 the VEGA doubled the
most northern promontory of Asia, and made her celebrated circumnavi-
gation of the two continents of the Old World.
CH. i] THE NEW WORLD 23
Anthony Jenkinson) pushed into Asia by way of the Volga
and the Caspian Sea in 1558, and two years later was
dispatched on a commercial mission to the Sophi of Persia.
These beginnings led to considerable developments of
England's Baltic trade during the next decade.
But it was westward, not eastward, that English sea-
men's eyes were chiefly turned ; the treasure of the Spanish
Main, not the merchandise of Tiflis and Samarcand, called
aloud to the adventurous spirit of the nation of islanders.
With the accession of Elizabeth we enter upon a new phase
of national development. The bonfires which blazed up
on the death of Mary symbolised the new expansive spirit
of a nation which, though by no means completely united,
was moved to the pursuit of aggressive aims ; and the
challenge to the domination by Spain and Portugal of the
New Hemisphere rang out clearer and clearer with Eng-
land's growing consciousness of power upon the seas.
The Pope's decree, by which the New World had been
divided between the two Catholic Sovereigns, was not at
once actively defied either by England or France. Neither
country, in fact, was in a state to do so at the end of the
fifteenth century, nor had the new religion sprung into
vigorous birth. But half a dozen decades had brought
sweeping changes. Catholic England had become a
Protestant State, and a long period of peace had fostered
the growth of national self-consciousness. The almost
submissive tone of Henry VIII's Council — " if the Spani-
ards or Portuguese suffer us not to join them " i — is replaced
with a very different note. In the third year of Elizabeth's
reign even the cautious Cecil bluntly tells the Spanish
Ambassador that the Pope had no right to partition the
world. It was, however, England's seamen — rough mer-
chant sailors — rather than her statesmen, who were
challenging the pretensions and the colonial regulations
of the Catholic Powers. The English, freed from the last
trace of Continental entanglements — even Calais had just
been lost to them — were embracing more and more
effectually their birthright on the sea. In other ways
they were favourably placed for extracting full advantage
from the new conditions. Geographically, the kingdom
lay between the King of Spain's southern dominions and
his rich and prosperous province of Flanders — a strategic
i Vide ante, p. 20.
24 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
position the value of which was illustrated by the frequent
success of the reprisals at sea that marked Elizabeth's
foreign policy. The staunch mercantile class, with which
so much real power rested, were developing overseas trade
at a rapid rate ; and the experiences gained from many
a stormy voyage in the northern latitudes were applied
to good purpose in the shipbuilding yards, which were
beginning to turn out swifter and more weatherly ships
than those of any other nation. The day of the oared
galley was already passing ; its last great sea-fight was
to come in 1571 in the Bay of Lepanto, a short-lived
triumph for the decaying Spanish sea power. Hitherto,
sea power had been, in a modern historian's happy phrase,1
" pelagic not oceanic " ; now oars, the means of propulsion
by which the mastery of the Mediterranean had been
maintained for centuries, had yielded precedence to sails,
the instrument of supremacy on the ocean. It was English
merchant vessels and English seamen who were to prove
the full significance of that revolution in the type of
ocean-going ships which the age of discovery had
inaugurated.
After his marriage with Mary Tudor, Philip of Spain
sought for his own purposes to encourage the increase of
the English Navy. But the unpopularity of the marriage
was deepened by the persecuting zeal of the fanatical
Queen, and before the end of the short reign the new
religion had given many recruits — particularly from among
the West Country families of good blood and with sea
associations — to the ranks of the privateers. Without
entering into the religious aspect of the matter, it may
be noted how truly the rising Protestant States drew
their strength from the sea. Persecution in France turned
many Huguenots into sea adventurers, preying on the
traffic of the Catholic nations, and even attempting settle-
ments in Spanish America ; the dreaded " Sea Beggars "
were a later creation of the burnings and slaughterings
of Alva in the Netherlands.
England's national spirit, then, found its fullest and
fittest expression in the deeds of the sea adventurers, and
Elizabeth, of whom the Spanish Ambassador Feria told
his master that " she is very much wedded to her people
and thinks as they do," adapted this formidable weapon
1 A. F. Pollard (Pol. Hist, of England, vol. vi, p. 309).
CH. i] ELIZABETH'S NAVY 25
to the main purpose of her policy — namely, the unity of
the nation and the preservation of the realm from foreign
intervention. It was a policy that combined bold strategy
with circumspect tactics. The privateers, with their
often dubious letters of marque, found in their Sovereign
a tacit ally. The Queen might, and as the reign advanced
often did, take a private share in the expeditions to the
West, or even lend a Royal ship to stiffen a squadron
of merchantmen bound for the Indies. But it was clearly
understood that officially she had no responsibility for
any deeds that might be called in question, or for any
unlucky miscarriages ; and if any freebooters were caught
red-handed, they knew they must abide their fate without
appeal to their Queen. In fine, " it was Elizabeth's privi-
lege to reap the fruits of public peace, while her subjects
gleaned the spoils of private war."
This line of policy was, indeed, almost dictated by the
conditions with which the reign opened. The Exchequer
was impoverished, and the letters of Sir Thomas Gresham,
the City magnate and Elizabeth's first Ambassador at
Antwerp, plainly indicate two facts — the difficulty of
maintaining the English Queen's credit, and the country's
dependence for gunpowder on supplies from abroad. As
to the Royal Navy proper, the imposing fleet which
Henry VIII had assembled was represented at the
accession of his daughter by a total of only twenty-two
" great ships." These and other signs of weakness due
to religious and political causes deceived some Spanish
observers. Feria, bred up in the tradition of Spain's
military strength on land, went so far as to describe
England in a phrase which has become familiar in our own
day as " the sick man of Europe," and recommended
Philip to land an army promptly and turn the island into
a Spanish province. Philip, probably, had a better idea
of the latent strength beneath the apparent weakness.
Elizabeth's difficulties and problems were, in truth, real
enough ; but a dozen years of her statesmanlike handling
of affairs and of English enterprise on the seas were enough
to give to Feria's words an echo of mocking irony. As to
certain elements of our naval strength, some Spaniards
remained deceived even after the defeat of the Armada,
but there was little self-illusion in the letter written by
Feria's successor, Guerau, in 1570. " The whole channel,"
26 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
he said, " from Falmouth to the Downs is infested. . . .
They assail every ship that passes, of whatever nation,
and after capturing them, equip them for their own pur-
poses, by this means continually increasing their fleet,
with the intention on the part of the queen thus to make
war on his Majesty through these pirates without its costing
her anything, and under the specious pretence that she is
not responsible, since the pirates carry authority from
Chatillon, Vendome, and Orange."
That is a vivid glimpse of the unofficial war carried on
in the Narrow Seas by the English seamen. Nor can it
be regarded as too highly coloured a picture of a time
when the Mayor and principal inhabitants of a port like
Dover were among the most active of the Rovers, and
when even English vessels engaged in the Antwerp trade
and the very fishermen on the coast often fell victims to
the more reckless type of pirate. But already greater
deeds were being accomplished in the waters of the New
World — deeds in which it is sometimes hard to distinguish
the different elements of trading — legitimate enough
according to the ideas of the time — exploring, and sheer
piracy ; yet which, by their daring, skill, and hardihood,
have justly won a classic place in maritime history. The
early slave-trading voyages of John Hawkins are of special
interest as a definite attempt to break down the Spanish
commercial monopoly in the New World. Modern ideas
of slavery have cast an unjust opprobrium on the name of
one of the greatest Elizabethan seamen. Hawkins was
no better or worse than his time, and no " guilt " attached
to slave-owning or slave-dealing in the sixteenth century.
It was not in any case the nature of the cargo that gave
special significance to this expedition of a seafaring mer-
chant ; its importance lay in its overt challenge to Spain.
Hawkins, doubtless, spoke for a section of English mercantile
opinion when he claimed the right, under treaties dating
back to the first Tudor reign, to trade with the Spanish
Colonies. Yet the challenge was a bold and new departure.
French pirates, mostly Huguenots, had for thirty years
been harrying Spain's trade routes in the West, and only
ten years before a bold French corsair, with a single ship,
had, with the help of escaped slaves, laid waste some of
the chief settlements of the Spanish Main, and even sacked
Havana itself. But no English squadron had yet navigated
CH. i] HAWKINS'S FIRST VOYAGE 27
the waters of the Spanish Indies. And though Hawkins and
other traders had flouted Portuguese pretensions, based on
the papal decree already referred to, and had freely
traded with the Guinea coasts, and even with Brazil,
no similar invasion of Spanish claims had hitherto been
attempted.
It was while trading to the Canary Islands that Hawkins
learnt l that " negroes were very good merchandise to
Hispaniola, and that store of them might easily be had
upon the coast of Guinea" ; and in 1562, with three small
vessels, whose tonnage would make a Solent yachtsman
smile, he sailed from Plymouth for Sierra Leone. There
he collected two hundred negroes, " partly by the sword " —
it is a rough story of rough times, which are not to be judged
by the ordinary standards of the twentieth century —
crossed the Atlantic, disposed of his human goods with
much profit and little difficulty to the planters of Hispani-
ola, where the shortage of labour was severely felt, and
returned home " with prosperous success and much gain
to himself and the aforesaid Adventurers." In what seems
to have been an honest belief in the legitimacy of his
proceedings, Hawkins, on the return voyage, had dis-
patched two vessels chartered in the West Indies with a
portion of his goods to a Spanish port. Philip left no
doubt as to his view of the voyage. He seized the cargoes
on their arrival, and dispatched peremptory orders to the
Colonies forbidding all trading intercourse with English
vessels. The Adventurers who had planned and financed
the voyage, the Lord Mayor of London being of their
number, sought in vain to obtain redress for what they
regarded as an illegal seizure. While in American waters
Hawkins had acted with the circumspection of an astute
and experienced trader. He obtained the requisite licence
to trade from the Governor at the ports of Hispaniola at
which he had called ; he paid the local customs dues, or
left security for any sums in dispute ; he even obtained
from the authorities written evidence of his good conduct
during his sojourn. These points were urged without
avail ; nor, indeed, did they touch the main issue. Philip's
insistence on his exclusive policy showed clearly enough
his recognition of a threat to his sea dominion more for-
1 Hakluyt is our authority for this, as for the other great Elizabethan
voyages.
28 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
midable than that of the French pirates, and his deter-
mination to resist it to the uttermost. If one were to
compile a list of single voyages which have marked the
opening of great commercial or political epochs, the little
squadron with which John Hawkins made his first
expedition might well claim its place therein.
Hawkins's second voyage, 1565, was a repetition of the
first on a rather larger scale, and not only brought him
and his fellow-adventurers a handsome profit of 60 per cent.,
but established his renown among his countrymen, par-
ticularly as a seaman. In this instance he had carried
his negroes to the Spanish Main itself, and, confronted
by the Viceroy's order forbidding any dealings with him,
had to back his negotiations with a show of force before
the necessary licence to trade was forthcoming from the
authorities. He was careful to follow his usual custom
of obtaining certificates for good conduct. The success
of the voyage, while it excited feverish anticipations and
hopes, and strengthened the growing consciousness of the
superiority of English sea power, awoke the liveliest alarm
in Spain, and fears for the two great treasure fleets which
annually made the voyage between the West Indies and
Spain now found expression in the Spanish Ambassador's
correspondence with Philip.
Hawkins lost no time preparing for another expedition,
and at the same time Thomas Fenner, one of the Chichester
Fenners, was busy fitting out a trading expedition to the
Guinea coast. Political reasons were, at the moment,
giving a conciliatory turn to the Queen's foreign policy,
and De Silva's remonstrances resulted in both seamen
being required to find heavy security that they would not
go to the Indies. Hawkins, therefore, temporarily aban-
doned his scheme, but Fenner, having no intention,
apparently, of going farther than the Guinea coast, sailed
in the Castle of Comfort, with one other small vessel.
The voyage was to prove a memorable one, and to open
many eyes to the fighting quality of the English merchant-
man of the day. At the Cape Verde Islands Fenner found
all his attempts at peaceable trade prevented by the open
hostility of the Portuguese authorities, and at the Azores,
when separated from his consort, he was caught by a
Portuguese squadron, consisting of a 400-ton galleon and
two caravels. Three times that day the Castle of Com-
CH. i] HAWKINS'S THIRD VOYAGE 29
fort beat off her assailants. The next day, the Portuguese
commander, reinforced by four more caravels, again
attacked, but so gallantly did Fenner fight his ship that
at nightfall the powerful squadron drew off and he escaped.
English seamen already enjoyed a wide reputation for skill
and hard fighting on the high seas. But Fenner's splendid
combat against heavy odds went far to establish also the
technical superiority of English gunnery. The incident is
the more noteworthy since, only a decade earlier, the
Portuguese had again and again proved themselves more
than a match for English and French gold-dust traders
in conflicts off the Guinea coast.
The third and most important expedition of Hawkins
left Plymouth in October 1567, its unacknowledged
destination, privily approved by the Queen,1 being the
Spanish Indies. The squadron of six vessels included two
" great ships " of the Royal Navy, a fact in accordance
with the universal custom of the day, by which ships-of-war
were employed in commerce in times of peace. These
ships were the JESUS OF LUBECK, of 700 tons, a sturdy
survivor of Henry VIII's fleet, and the MINION, 300-350
tons. Of the remaining four vessels, the Judith, a little
barque of 50 tons, was commanded by Hawkins's young
kinsman, Francis Drake, now twenty-two years of age,
and already burning with a grievance against treacherous
treatment at Rio de la Hacha, and destined, as a result
of his voyage, to become the terror of the Spanish Main.
The presence of Her Majesty's ships had a political signi-
ficance beyond the Royal desire to take a share in what
promised to be a highly profitable enterprise. The
squadron was armed and organised on the lines of the
Royal Navy ; its complement of 500 men included several
gentlemen of good houses, whose swords were at the
disposal of the Captain of Soldiers ; and Hawkins, who at
this period might fairly be ranked among the merchant
princes of his time, and who described himself in his
letter to Cecil as an " orderly person " who had " always
hated folly," who, moreover, as Hakluyt's pages proved,
wielded an able pen — Hawkins himself kept the state of
one of Her Majesty's Admirals at the Seas. A man, in
1 Sir Julian Corbett thinks it " hardly doubtful " that the agent who
brought Hawkins a letter from Cecil, warning him to avoid damages to
Spaniards, also conveyed the secret consent of Elizabeth to the purpose
of the voyage. (Drake and the Tudor Navy, vol. i, p. 99.)
30 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. I
short, worthy of the role with which he regarded himself
as entrusted — that of vindicating, by force if need were,
the legitimate aspirations of English commerce ! Acts of
illegality — judged by modern standards — were undoubtedly
committed on this memorable voyage, but none of the
great figures in the new school of adventure which was
now arising, and Hawkins least of all, is to be classed
with those cosmopolitan buccaneers of a later century,
whose criminal deeds and reckless careers have surrounded
the very name of the Spanish Main with an irresistible if
sinister glamour of romance. Romance was far from
wanting to the deeds of these Elizabethan mariners, but
what gives those deeds their epic quality, as enshrined in
the immortal pages of Hakluyt, is the national spirit and
national purpose which inspired them.
The course of the voyage of the JESUS OF LUBECK and
her consorts may be followed in the Admiral's own narra-
tive as recorded by that chronicler. Reprisals on the
Portuguese, as well as the usual hunting for negroes,
marked the weeks spent on the African coast ; and when
the Atlantic had been crossed, the ship sailed from place
to place, " making traffic " with the Spaniards — " some-
what hardly, because the King had steadily commanded
all his Governors in those parts by no means to suffer any
trade to be made with us." Nevertheless, they met on
the whole with " courteous entertainment," save at Rio
de la Hacha, the depot for the pearl trade, and a place of
disagreeable memories for Francis Drake. Carthagena,
which was to have been the last port of call, also proved
officially obdurate, and then, some days later, arose the
" extreme storm " which drove the ships out of their course,
and ultimately involved them in the disastrous incident
of San Juan de Ulua. Into this roadstead, the haven of
the town of Vera Cruz, the battered squadron came to refit
and revictual, and no doubt to force a market for the
negroes that remained unsold. The consternation of the
Spaniards was great when they recognised their formidable
visitors, for lying at moorings were the treasure-ships with
over a million on board, awaiting the annual fleet of New
Spain and its escorts for the combined homeward voyage.
A huge prize, in fact, lay at the Englishman's mercy. If
Hawkins had been a mere pirate he would have seized it
out of hand, and he proved himself the " orderly " trader
CH. i] THE FIGHT IN THE HARBOUR 31
he had always claimed to be by ignoring the treasure.
He took certain measures of defence against treachery,
and sent a formal message to the city authorities for
permission to refit and obtain requisite supplies, with the
further request that action should be taken to prevent any
conflict between him and the expected Mexico fleet. The
very next morning the " flota " appeared at the mouth
of the Haven, headed by a Royal galleon.
Of the dramatic events which followed, Sir Julian Corbett
has given a singularly clear and unbiassed account, based
on both English and Spanish authorities.1 Passing over
the details, one may state the facts broadly thus : Hawkins,
with a couple of batteries mounted ashore for his protection,
was strong enough to have prevented the entry of a newly-
arrived fleet, and to have accomplished its destruction.
But he was fully aware that an overt act of war would have
been displeasing to the Queen, and he gave fresh evidence
of his discretion and sense of responsibility by entering
into negotiations with the Viceroy and the Admiral of the
Fleet. Under the terms arranged after a good deal of
disputation, the two fleets moored side by side within the
protection of the breakwater, the English were permitted
to continue their refitting, and hostages were exchanged.
The sequel to this formal military convention was a care-
fully matured plot on the part of the Spaniards. Secret
reinforcements were smuggled on board the ships, and the
signal for a cowardly attack was given with the sudden
stabbing of several English sailors who had been drinking
and fraternising with the Spaniards ashore. Taken
unawares and at a complete disadvantage, Hawkins fought
a fierce action, in which his superior gunnery silenced the
enemy's fire and sank at least two galleons ; but discharges
from the shore batteries, treacherously captured at the
first signal, had sunk one of his own vessels and disabled
another, and when the Spaniards loosed a couple of fire-ships
at night, the badly crippled JESUS had to be abandoned to
her fate, and Hawkins himself barely escaped by boarding
the MINION just as her sails were filling. The only other
vessel to get away was the Judith, Drake having worked
out of the harbour. In the northerly gale which immedi-
ately afterwards sprang up the two ships were separated,
and the little barque was the first to arrive home; but
1 Drake and the Tudor Navy (Corbett), vol. i, p. Ill et seq.
32 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. I
there seems no evidence for Hawkins's complaint of de-
sertion against his kinsman.1
It was a tragic and disastrous story, that lost nothing
in its effect when told to English ears. It came at a time
when the hostility of Spain and the activity of the counter-
reformation were becoming more and more menacing, and
when Catholic plots were on foot at home against Eliza-
beth's life and throne. " The military and seafaring men
all over England," says Camden, of the San Juan de Ulua
affair, " fretted and demanded war against the Spaniards."
Cautious as ever, Elizabeth remained true to her principle
"No war, my lords," but her help to the Huguenots and to
the rebellious subjects of Philip in the Netherlands became
more active. Finally, in 1572, came the exposure of the
foreign plot to assassinate Elizabeth, whichled to thedismissal
of the Spanish Ambassador and brought the two countries
to the verge of open war. It was in that same year that
Francis Drake fitted out the expedition which was to achieve
one of the greatest adventures in our maritime annals.
The incident of San Juan de Ulua had created in the
minds of Hawkins and Drake a feeling of bitter resentment
and irreconcilable hostility towards Spain. Hawkins,
whose energies were soon to become absorbed in the official
work of the Royal Navy, had secured the release of his
abandoned crews, as well as heavy compensation, by the
characteristic method of a sham intrigue in which he
completely outwitted the Spanish Ambassador. Drake
sought another way by taking out letters of reprisal, armed
with which commission he joined in two voyages to the
Spanish Indies. On the second occasion he captured at
least one valuable prize. More important still, he effected
a valuable reconnaissance in the Gulf of Darien, estab-
lished friendly relations with the Maroons (the escaped
negroes of the Panama Isthmus), and even set up a regular
base for future operations. For Drake was taking up the
work of Hawkins, and, by infusing into it a new spirit of
daring and a contempt ^for tradition, bettering the in-
struction of his master. So now he sailed out of Plymouth
Sound on the famous voyage of Nombre de Dios, bent on
reprisals in the form of a piratical adventure, but, we cannot
doubt, with a perfectly clear conscience, convinced, as
1 " So," runs Hawkins's narrative in Hakluyt, " with the MINION only
and the Judith, the small barque of ten ton, we escaped ; which barque
the same night forsook us in our great misery."
CH.I] DRAKE IN THE SPANISH MAIN 83
all his Protestant countrymen were convinced, of the ab-
solute justice of the proceedings. The voyage may be said
to mark a new departure in sea-going expeditions — a
change in effect from armed trading to privateering.
The little squadron consisted of two vessels only —
the Pascha, of 70 tons, and the Swan, of which his brother,
John Drake, was captain, of only 25 tons. But small as
it was, its equipment was as perfect as the military science
of the day could make it. Crossing the Atlantic in twenty-
five days, Drake anchored to water his ships off the
American coast, and then made the secret harbour where
on his previous voyage he had improvised a base. To his
chagrin, he found that the Spaniards had discovered and
plundered his stores. While at this spot he fell in with
another English adventurer, Captain Ranse, carrying two
Spanish prizes along with him. To the new-comer Drake
revealed his plans ; he meant to seize Nombre de Dios, the
renowned depot of the Spanish traffic from Peru — to seize it
while the treasure-houses were still full. Articles of partner-
ship were agreed on ; and after setting up the pinnaces which
Drake had brought with him, the combined squadron sailed
north-west along the coast to the Pine Islands, where
Ranse remained with the three ships and the prize caravel,
while Drake continued the voyage with the pinnaces and
the remaining prizes and a force of seventy-three men.
In a few days the little expedition reached the entrance
to Nombre de Dios Bay, and an hour before dawn dashed
in to the attack by the light of the moon. While the
Englishmen were forming up on the sand after surprising
the shore battery, the church bell was frantically pealing
its alarm in the ears of the terrified inhabitants. For his
assault on the town Drake divided his men into two forces,
and after a brief resistance the Spaniards, caught between
the double fusilade and over-estimating the strength of
their assailants, broke and fled, casting away their arms
as the sailors, with broad West Country cheers, chased them
through the Panama gate. With the plaza held, the hunt
for treasure began. In the Governor's house were found
bars of silver piled high, 350 tons in all, awaiting the arrival
of the flota of Tierra Firme — the treasure fleet of the
Spanish Main. But it was gold and jewels, not merely
silver, that Drake was in search of, and these were stored
within the solid masonry of the King's Treasure-House,
34 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
down by the water. It was then that the first check
occurred to damp the ardour of these amazing men of the
sea. A tropical downpour of rain necessitated their seeking
shelter for the sake of bow-strings and powder, and the
consequent abandonment of their post in the plaza, and
the stout walls of the treasure-house resisted all efforts
to break in. Rumours of Spanish reinforcements produced
something like a panic, and how natural was the feeling
can easily be imagined. For never before had these simple
though daring merchant seamen engaged in such an extreme
adventure as this of Drake's — the deliberately-planned
attack by a diminutive, if well-found, land force, upon a
town of such size that the men of Devon could only
compare it with their well-loved port of Plymouth.
The rain, however, ceased, and Drake controlled the
panic with characteristic resource and courage. A de-
tachment was sent round to break in the doors of the
treasure-house, and the wildest , dreams of the seamen
might well have been realised but for another unlucky
stroke of fate. Their indomitable leader had concealed a
wound received in the first Spanish volley, and now at the
critical moment he suddenly fell in a swoon. That ended
the matter. The men, vowing their captain's life more
valuable than all the treasure of the Indies, bore him to
the boats, and picking up on the way out, with a coolness
that provokes a smile, a solitary wine-ship newly arrived
at its moorings in the harbour, they installed themselves
and their wounded on the town's victualling island just
outside the bay. Hither in due time came, on a spying
errand and under a flag of truce, an officer bearing a message
from the Governor couched in terms of true Spanish
politeness, and paying tribute to the humanity shown by
Drake on his previous expeditions. The visitor was finally
dismissed with a flow of equally impressive compliments, but
with the plain assurance that Captain Drake, ere he departed,
meant to reap some of the harvest of that commodity which
alone would satisfy his company. The story of this interview,
the substantial truth of which seems indubitable, reads
like a page from some stirring romance. It is of special
interest, also, as illustrating those qualities in the young
commander which consistently marked his future career — a
strong regard for humane dealing, and a love of ceremonial
and display befitting the dignity of a great sea-captain.
CH. i] THE TREASURE-TRAIN 35
For the present, however, the stroke so daringly con-
ceived and so energetically executed had failed. Yet the
fact remained that Nombre de Dios, the very gate of the
Peruvian Treasure-House, had been actually taken and
for awhile held, and Drake returned to the waiting ships
evolving new schemes in his restless brain. These plans,
based on the information of a runaway slave called Diego,
did not commend themselves to Ranse, who parted
company with the bolder man, arguing, with reason enough,
that the affair of Nombre de Dios would have given the
alarm to all the coast settlements. So, indeed, the event
proved when Drake turned to his next incredible adventure
— an attempt on the capital of the Spanish Main itself.
Carthagena, like the rest of the ports, was on the alert,
and though he took three prizes in the bay, including a
well-laden Seville ship, he quickly saw that some new plan
must be evolved. What he finally decided on was a novel
and characteristic departure from the general method of
harrying the coast — nothing less than a raid into the
interior. And his purpose was to seize, in co-operation
with the Maroons, the mule-train which would bring the
treasure of Peru from Panama across the Isthmus to
Nombre de Dios for shipment to Spain. In order to man
the pinnaces, which would be essential to the enterprise,
it was necessary to sacrifice one of his ships, and the secret
scuttling of the Swan, his own vessel and a particularly
good sailer, is one of those incidents which cast a flood of
light on the masterful and fearless character of this born
leader of men. Back in the Gulf of Darien a new head-
quarters was established, and then passed months of
waiting for the great attempt — months full of the most
diversified incidents which are none the less astonishing
for the simplicity and directness with which the Narrative
sets them forth. It is a wonderful tale of privation,
extremity of tempest, daring defiance of Spanish authority,
threatened desertion, desperate fighting, decimating sick-
ness— a succession of vicissitudes such as might have
broken the stanchness of the bravest, and seemed only
to stimulate the great sea-captain to fresh feats of resource
and daring.
At length the march inland began, with the negro allies
as guides, and on the fourth day this devoted band of
English seamen reached the highest ridge of the Cordilleras,
36 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
at a point where the faithful Diego had promised his white
master that he should set eyes on the South Sea. Pizarro
and Cortez and Balboa had been there before him, but
can our maritime history conjure a more dramatic scene
than was enacted on this spot in the vast mountain forest ?
The Maroons led Drake to a " goodly and great tree,"
notched with steps for climbing, and promised him that
from its top he might see the two oceans at once. So the
mightiest of our mariners ascended, and having beheld —
with what pure passion of the explorer surging in his
heart ! — " that sea of which he had heard such golden
reports," made his memorable vow, beseeching " Almighty
God of His goodness to give him life and leave to sail once
in an English ship in that sea." And another contem-
porary chronicler (Camden) adds, " From that time forward
his mind was pricked on continually night and day to
perform his vow." Not long after his first sight of the
Southern Sea, Drake had accomplished the crowning feat
of his daring raid, by the capture of the mule treasure-
train on its way across the Panama Isthmus.
It was not till November 1577 that Drake sailed from
Plymouth on the immortal voyage of circumnavigation
which was to accomplish his vow. The fame of his past
exploits brought a throng of volunteers to his service, and
the expedition was a considerable one for the time, con-
sisting of the Pelican (Admiral), of 100 tons, and four
smaller vessels, all well armed and equipped. To follow
the course of one of the most famous voyages in history
is beyond our scope, and excellent contemporary narratives
have made its details familiar. Drake's purpose was to
reach the Pacific, by way of the passage discovered by
Magellan in his last fatal voyage ; and so, having crossed
the Atlantic, he took a south-westerly course along the
South American coast. Every sort of misfortune seemed
to dog his way ; the fleet was scattered by storm, and one
of the smaller vessels foundered ; dissensions occurred
between the sea officers and the gentlemen volunteers ;
and the extraordinary episode in which Thomas Doughty
played the leading role ended with the execution of that
officer in the little port of St. Julian. In the buffetings
which befell the ships on rounding the American continent
Drake discovered the open sea-passage south of Magellan's
Straits, and it was during these terrible months of almost
CH. i] DRAKE IN THE PACIFIC 37
ceaseless tempests, contrary winds, and incipient mutiny,
that the Elizabeth, Wynter's ship (Vice- Admiral), was
separated from her consort in a fearful storm, and, giving
up the struggle, made the best of her way home.
Thus it was left to Drake in the Golden Hind (as the
Pelican had been rechristened on entering the Southern
Seas) to accomplish the voyage alone. And everyone
knows how magnificently he accomplished it, once he had
burst into that sea which the Spaniards imagined to be
their sole and secure domain. All along the Spanish
settlements of Chili and Peru he spread amazed terror.
Prize after prize was taken, generally with little resistance ;
the port of the world-renowned Potosi Mine was coolly
ransacked, though without much result ; and finally,
despite her fortnight's start, a huge treasure- ship, " the
great glory of the South Sea," was overhauled and cap-
tured before she could reach the shelter of Panama
Harbour. So with £600,000 worth of treasure in his hold,
literally ballasted with silver and gold and precious stones,
Drake sailed north in a fruitless effort to make in reverse
the north-west passage which Frobisher was supposed to
have discovered in his famous voyage a few years earlier.
Baffled by contrary gales and by conditions of Arctic
severity, the Golden Hind, with the aid of a captured
China pilot's chart, crossed the Pacific, reached the
Moluccas (being nearly cast away in those perilous waters),
and, having added a cargo of costly spices to her gold and
silver, made her way home round the Cape of Good Hope.
So much for a bare outline of the voyage — the first cir-
cumnavigation of the world ever achieved by a sea-captain,
and that captain a merchant seaman. Its political con-
sequences were far-reaching. Drake became the hero of
his fellow-countrymen, and the example of his great
adventure, with its direct challenge to the pelagic empire
of Spain, was a powerful incentive to national enterprise.
The Golden Hind's reappearance in Plymouth Sound
came at a critical moment to widen the breach already
growing between England and Spain, and when the now-
famous craft had been brought round in triumph to the
Thames, and the Queen went down to knight its captain
and to dine in state on board, the official recognition of the
great raid was complete. After Philip's absorption of the
kingdom of Portugal, with its immense maritime re-
38 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. I
sources, open war became only a question of time, and no
doubt existed as to the objects with which Philip was
already beginning to prepare a great offensive fleet. So
now we part company with Drake, the indomitable navi-
gator and brilliant sea adventurer. Henceforth, it was
largely to the work of national defence that Sir Francis
Drake, as Admiral of Her Majesty's Navy, devoted himself
in the interval that precedes the sailing of the Armada.
It must suffice here to record that, after the discovery of
Spanish complicity with Throgmorton's plot, Drake, with
Frobisher as second-in-command, conducted a raid of
reprisals on the Spanish Indies with a fleet of thirty sail,
plundering, sacking, and ransoming, on a scale hitherto
unattempted ; and that, by his blockading operations off
the Spanish coast two years later, he threw Santa Cruz's
plans into utter confusion and delayed the sailing of the
Armada by a twelvemonth.
The familiar story of that determined attempt at invasion
need not be told here, beyond noting that this great fight
in the Narrow Seas sheds lustre on the daring of the Eliza-
bethan merchantmen, whether trading vessels or privateers,
and on their crews. Her Majesty's ships formed only the
nucleus of the fleet which gathered in the Channel under
the flag of Lord Howard of Effingham, with Drake and
Hawkins and Frobisher, as well as others scarcely less
famous, as his vice-admirals and captains. The defeat
of Medina Sidonia's vast and heterogeneous concourse of
craft was conclusive evidence of the complete superiority
of English ships, English gunnery, and English seamen
of the Royal Navy, which was once more to assume import-
ance. For not only were the English ships faster and
more weatherly than the enemy's, but their crews were
seamen and gunners too, capable equally of sailing their
ships and fighting them, nor did they need to crowd their
decks with soldiers as the Spanish did. Expressed briefly
and broadly, the English sea tactic was naval in its origin,
the Spanish military. In justice also to those fighting
seamen of three centuries ago, one other point should be
noticed. With some commentators it has been a habit
to ascribe the defeat of the Armada to the storms which
followed the battle off Gravelines. It is well, then, to
record here the simple fact that the Armada was a
Beaten and utterly demoralised fleet before it turned
CH. i] TRADE WITH THE EAST INDIES 39
northwards on its wild, storm-driven course round Scotland
—beaten by the superior dash, gunnery, and seamanship
of English sailors. The weather and the perils of those
northern waters completed the work of the English guns.
The bearing of this great fleet action on the further differ-
entiation between the naval and mercantile services may
conveniently be referred to later.
Drake's burst into the Southern Seas stimulated, as we
have said, the national spirit of adventure, and, in particular,
the minds of British merchant seamen were more than ever
bent on the ambition of reaching the land of spices and pre-
cious stones, so long the close preserve of the Portuguese.
Frobisher's great voyages to the north-west early in the reign
were originally inspired by the desire to find a north-west
passage to India, and they degenerated into a fruitless
quest for gold-yielding ore. In the years between Drake's
voyage of circumnavigation and the coming of the Armada,
John Davis, one of the most scientific of Elizabethan
navigators, followed in Frobisher's track in three successive
years in the hope of reaching India ; and in the same decade
Thomas Candish, taking Drake's old route by way of the
Magellan Straits, so far realised his ambitions as to reach
China and the East Indies, and ended by sailing round the
world. Sir Humphrey Gilbert's disastrous expedition to
Newfoundland of 1583 is to be noted as one of those early
attempts at British colonisation which seemed so fruitless
in their immediate results ; and in the following year
Sir Walter Raleigh obtained his letters patent " for the
planting of new lands on the coast of America," the first
step to the successful foundation of Virginia, the original
seat of the Anglo-American race.
It is, however, with the rise and prosperity of the East
India Company that the history of the Merchant Marine
in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is chiefly
associated. The defeat of the Armada provided a new
incentive to Englishmen to share in the coveted trade with
India. Candish, who returned from his great voyage just
in time to hear of his countrymen's triumph, brought home
detailed observations of the greatest value to British
seamen and British merchants. So in the following year
we find a significant decision taken by the syndicate
concerned in dispatching John Davis on his north-west
voyages. Abandoning this long-cherished hope, they
40 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
sent out yet another expedition under the great navigator,
but this time by way of the Cape of Good Hope. It proved
the first of a series of voyages which only ceased with the
death of this fine seaman, who was killed by pirates off the
coast of Malacca. More significant, however, than Davis's
voyage of 1589 was the action taken in that year by certain
English merchants in petitioning the Queen for licence
and encouragement to open a trade with the East Indies.
In support of their memorial, they urged that such trade
would, as the example of Portugal had shown, tend to the
increase of the strength of the Royal Navy. Elizabeth
characteristically toyed with the proposal, but in the end
granted the necessary authority, and in April 1591 " three
tall ships " — the Penelope, Marchant Royall, and
Edward Bonaventure — sailed out of Plymouth Sound
under James Lancaster. Hakluyt's narrative of the
voyage l shows that from Table Bay the Marchant Royall
was sent back owing to the ravages of scurvy, and that
the Penelope foundered in a " mighty storme " soon
after rounding the Cape. With a stricken crew and a
partially disabled ship, Lancaster kept steadfastly on his
way through hurricanes and " electric storms," and with
the further loss of his master and sixteen men treacherously
slain at Comoro Islands, to Zanzibar. Here the mariners
had their first taste of the acute jealousy with which the
Portuguese regarded all rivals in the rich trade of the East.
After some months on the African coast, Lancaster got a
favourable wind to take him across the Indian Ocean,
doubled Cape Comorin, missed the Nicobar Islands
" through our master's default for want of due observation
of the South Starre," and reached one of the small islands
to the north of Sumatra. In spite of the weakness of a
crew now reduced to thirty-three men and a boy, the
Edward picked up two small prizes, and then, while lying
in wait in the Malacca Straits, this resolute little fighter
attacked and captured a Portuguese trader of 250 tons,
and later on a ship of 750 tons with a cargo of great variety
and value. In fact, profit was looked for from what was
considered a legitimate form of piracy rather than from
trade, and but for a run of ill-luck of all kinds, Lancaster
would have remained lurking in the Nicobar Islands,
whither he returned on the homeward voyage, in the
1 He obtained his story from Lancaster's lieutenant, Edmund Barker,
CH. i] THE FIRST EAST INDIA COMPANY 41
knowledge that many a rich merchantman from Bengal
and Siam would be sure to pass that way on the first stage
of the voyage to Lisbon. A mutinous spirit among his
men, damage by storm, contrary gales, shortness of
provisions so that off Porto Rico they were reduced to
eating hides, culminated in the loss of the ship herself while
the majority of the company were ashore. Finally,
Lancaster and his companions obtained a passage home on
board a Dieppe ship, and crossed to Rye in May 1594. In
a sense, the voyage had been disastrous. But Lancaster's
misfortunes had purchased a fruitful experience and a
fund of valuable information, and offered English mer-
chants and seamen a great and convincing proof that the
treasure-house of the East lay open before them.
Meanwhile, the Dutch were beginning to establish that
trade with the Orient which was soon to enable them to
supplant the Portuguese as our chief rivals, and their
enterprise spurred London merchants to new action. In
1599, a number of them, chiefly associated with the Levant
Company, which held a charter for overland trading to
India, petitioned for a monopoly of trade with the East
Indies. The Queen gave her assent to the petition at the
end of the following year, the trading privilege being
granted for a period of fifteen years, and thus came into
existence the first East India Company — the progenitor
of that " John Company " which was to be the means of
adding India to the British Empire. No time was lost
in dispatching the first expedition of these " Adventurers
for the Discoverie of the Trade for the East Indies." The
fleet of four vessels — of tonnage ranging from 300 to 130,
with crews to the number of 480 men — left Woolwich in
February 1601. A fitting " generall of the Fleet " was
found in James Lancaster, who in his recent voyage had
given such plain proof of indomitable courage and re-
sourceful leadership, and with him as Vice- Admiral went
John Middleton, and as Pilot-Major, the famous John
Davis. The voyage was a complete success. Lancaster
put his merchants ashore to trade, and established factories
in Java and elsewhere, and while this more legitimate
business was going on, himself got across the trade route
and presently captured a rich carack of 900 tons. On the
voyage home, this gallant seaman proved his rare qualities
afresh by saving his ship in well-nigh desperate circum-
42 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
stances, such as would have tested the nerve and endurance
of the bravest. The little fleet returned in the early
months of James I's reign, laden with cargoes that included
over a million pounds of pepper, and those who had in-
vested their money received 95 per cent, on their capital.
The same four vessels made the company's second voyage
in the following year, with a resulting profit of nearly
100 per cent., to which, as before, extensive privateering
had largely contributed; and in 1607 a third expedition
set out, remarkable for the fact that now, for the first time,
the company's ships entered a port of the Indian sub-
continent itself. This port was Surat, just above Bombay,
and an agent was landed to convey to the Great Mogul at
Agra a letter of recommendation from King James I. A
little later that Sovereign extended the Company's Charter,
and in the same year (1609) was present at the launching
of the largest contemporary East Indiaman, the Trade's
Increase, one of the first two vessels built in the company's
own yard at Deptford. A ship of 1,100 tons, she was one
of the sensations of the early seventeenth century, but she
proved clumsy and unhandy, and came to a tragic end
after a brief and adventurous career. She may be taken
as a fitting illustration of the rule of thumb methods of
ship construction then prevailing, and it may be noted here
that it was not until after the Stuart period that English
shipbuilding began to establish itself on a scientific basis,
largely as the result of the example of French naval models.
At this early period in its history, the East India Com-
pany is seen firmly established as well as earning handsome
dividends for its shareholders, its ships built in its own
yard (although this practice was changed at a later date)
and victualled from its own stores, and enjoying the
enormous advantage of a hydrographical department of
its own, based on the journals and observations compul-
sorily contributed at the end of each voyage by the masters
of its fleet. Developments in India came swiftly. Sailing
with two vessels from Gravesend in 1612, Captain Best
encountered the Portuguese traders in Surat Roadstead,
and beat them in a skilfully-conducted action. It was a
small if decisive affair ; but its effects were immediate
and far-reaching. For the prestige of the Portuguese in
the East was sharply lowered, and the Grand Mogul
hastened to confer trading privileges, hitherto denied it,
CH. i] DUTCH RIVALRY 48
upon the new Power in the East. Factories were set going
at Surat and elsewhere, Sir Thomas Row came out three
years later as an Ambassador to the Grand Mogul in order
to ratify the new treaty, and by the same date the Indian
Marine, initiated by the Corporation as a means of pro-
tection from pirates and Portuguese alike and manned by
British seamen, had reached the total of ten local vessels.
Forty years later Cromwell, in pursuance of that policy
which is so well expressed in his Navigation Act, dealt the
last blow to Portugal's pride and sea dominance by ex-
torting a treaty giving to English ships the right to trade
in all the Portuguese possessions in the East.
The Navigation Acts of the seventeenth century, how-
ever, were mainly directed against the Dutch, for Holland
succeeded Portugal as our supreme rival on the seas. The
struggle with that stubborn sea-going race continued
almost ceaselessly for twenty-five years, and, while it nearly
exhausted the Dutch, left England buoyantly ready to
meet the more powerful rivalry of the French. In the great
expansion of England's sea power which followed, the
East India Company played a conspicuous part, and before
the end of the eighteenth century it stood virtually alone
as the one surviving trading Power in the Orient, its
operations embracing China as well as India. Moreover,
these strongly built, well-armed East Indiamen, with their
fine crews of seasoned sailors, did yeoman service for the
country in the long series of wars which culminated in the
Napoleonic struggle. For they constituted the chief
element in that large commercial marine which our mer-
cantile policy created as a reserve from which the Royal
Navy could be almost indefinitely increased.
It is convenient here to note one aspect of the significance
of the Armada campaign for its effect on the movement
towards that differentiation between the naval and mer-
cantile services which, as we have seen, was initiated by
the second Tudor king. Gallantly as the merchantmen
fought in single-ship combats, the naval battle in the
Channel showed how inadequate they were to the needs
of a great fleet action, and from the clear perception of
that fact sprang a strong impulse to specialisation and a
widening of the breach between professional and amateur
warfare at sea. The institution of Ship Money in the next
century marked a further step in the same direction.
44 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
The policy of Charles I expressed in that levy was to
substitute a system of money contributions as a means of
forming a regular fleet for the mediaeval plan of contributions
of ships. A few years later, Cromwell's policy secured,
under the professional soldier-admiral of the Blake type,
an increased specialisation, which by the end of the century
led to the practical disappearance of the merchantman as
a fleet ship.
II
THE MERCHANT NAVY IN THE REVOLUTIONARY AND
NAPOLEONIC WARS
IN that period of almost continuous war which began with
the struggle with Revolutionary France in 1793, and ended
with the downfall and exile of Napoleon in 1815, the
strength of France on the seas was devoted to the destruc-
tion of British commerce, and never with more determined
persistency than in the ten years which succeeded the
victory at Trafalgar. The conflict was maintained with
all the resources which France, ruled by despotism, was
able to throw into the scales, with the support of the
resources of allies whom she made her vassals. Yet this
result is clearly shown: that from the outbreak of hos-
tilities the strength of the British mercantile fleet ever
grew larger and larger, despite the unceasing onslaught
which was maintained against it, and despite the heavy
losses which such protracted warfare necessarily in-
volved.
Eleven thousand British merchant ships passed out of
the Service by capture as prizes during the French wars.1
Some compensation was found in the numbers of enemy
ships taken and transferred to our flag ; but the activity
in British shipyards was so well sustained that in 1815 this
country possessed more ships and a greater volume of
tonnage than at the opening of the Anglo-French struggle.
On the other hand, French trade in a few years was almost
swept from the seas by the British naval superiority,
and opportunities of prize-taking by our cruisers were
1 "Roll of English merchant vessels captured by the French during the
war, 1793-1815" — Norman's Corsairs of France.
CH. i] A WAR OF PRIVATEERS 45
necessarily smaller. France maintained a coastal trade
in the Mediterranean, but little more.
Fortunately for the world, at the outbreak of hostilities
in February 1793 England found herself complete mistress
of the seas. So early as 1795 the enemy had abandoned
all pretence of opposing fleet to fleet, and entered upon an
unrestricted guerre de course. France, the spirit of her
navy having Buffered during the Revolution, turned to
her mercantile fleet to supply its place. The object of
Revolutionary France was frankly stated by Citizen
Boyer Fonfrede in the Convention : " We have now "
(he said) " to wage a war of iron against gold. We
must ruin the commerce of our enemies, and in order
to remove all opportunity of reprisals we must suspend
our own commerce. Our shipbuilding yards must build
nothing but corsairs, and our manufactories turn out
nothing but munitions of war." British seamen, on
their part, responded with the audacity expected of
them. Not only were our frigates and sloops engaged in
constantly harrying the enemy and capturing his ships
wherever they showed the flag, but our forces afloat were
reinforced by hundreds of vessels, manned by British
merchant seamen, which sailed from British ports under
letters of marque. Liverpool alone had sixty-seven
privateers armed and manned, at sea or ready for sea, four
months after the outbreak of war.1 Numbers were fitted
out afterwards in the Thames and at east and south
coast ports, and operated in the North Sea and on more
distant cruising grounds. The significant admission was
made by the enemy, after six years of war, that " not a
single merchant vessel sailed under the French flag." 2
The challenge made to our predominance at sea by the
French Navy, revived under Napoleon, does not call for
consideration here, but the circumstances of the two rival
Powers at the outset coloured the whole conditions of the
war. If unable to fight a fleet action, France, by reason
of her geographical position, her long coasts, with so
many favourably-placed sally ports, and her large maritime
population, was more favourably situated than any other
Power in the world to conduct a campaign against British
maritime commerce. Those of her peaceful trading ships
1 Gomer Williams, The Liverpool Privateers.
2 Message to the Directory, January 1799.
46 MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH.JL
which escaped capture by British cruisers, or in close
pursuit were driven into her ports, effected a quick trans-
formation. France had in the sturdy Norman and Breton
populations of her coasts, inured to the hardships of life
at sea and already made familiar with war, a striking force
ready to be used, and they were not content to remain
idle while rich rewards were within their grasp. In
hundreds French merchant ships were armed and trans-
formed into privateers, new craft specially designed for
speed were laid down in the yards, and, sailing with letters
of marque, they harried the long lines of British ships
beating up the English channel or traversing the North
Sea routes. Into the single port of Dunkirk thirty-six
English prizes were brought within three months of the
outbreak of war. No fewer than 407 English prizes were
sold in that port alone before the Peace of Amiens brought
the first pause in the war. The enterprise or greed of
profit by owners was seconded by public subscriptions.
A club at Strasburg fitted out a corsair, the Jacobin, which
effectively raided British trade. The municipality of
Bordeaux equipped three corsairs, one of which, the General
Dumourier, in her first cruise, returned with prizes valued
at £240,000. Blank letters of marque were issued to the
Commissionaires of Marine in every port of France, and
from Dunkirk to St. Jean de Luz the coast was studded
with companies whose sole aim and object was the de-
struction of English commerce.1
The more venturesome French corsairs, better equipped
and fitted, and commanded by men whose daring won for
them a warm place in the hearts of their countrymen, lay
in wait for the valuable cargoes passing to and from India
and the East, and the highly important trade carried on
between England and the West Indies. France brought
into this service swift sailing ships, powerfully armed.
One of these privateers, the Bordelais, captured in 1799,
had operated at no greater distance than Tory Island,
about which she had done great damage in the previous
summer. Her keel was as long as that of our 38-gun
frigates, she was pierced for twenty- two guns on deck, had
twenty-four brass 12-pounders mounted, and carried a crew
numbering 222 men. The Bordelais was conducted into
Cork by His Majesty's ship REVOLUTIONNAIRE, after having
1 Norman, The Corsairs of France, p. 292.
CH. i] CONDITIONS IN THE CHANNEL 47
been chased 129 miles in nine and a half hours, being finally
overhauled in a gale of wind.1
As often before in her history, England at the outbreak
of war was unready. Nearly six months passed before
the Channel Fleet, under Lord Howe, got to sea. Near
home, in the early days of the struggle, it was believed
that British merchant shipping was best protected by the
concentration of a main fleet in the vicinity of Torbay,
with a reserve fleet off the Isle of Wight. Frigates
watched Brest and other French ports, and a constant
patrol was maintained. This disposition was afterwards
varied, the blockade of Brest being made still closer, and
two separate squadrons were formed, with bases at Spithead
and the North Sea. The sealing of French outlets could
rarely, however, as experience showed, be made effective
against raiding craft.
The configuration of the opposing coasts of France and
England and the small distances to be traversed by
fast-sailing raiders added greatly to the perplexity of the
problem confronting the British Admiralty. The English
Channel has nowhere a greater width than one hundred
miles, and at the neck narrows to twenty miles ; and
though the North Sea offered a broader expanse, the English
coast was quickly reached from the northern ports of
France and the Netherlands. The English south coast is
poorly provided with natural havens, and in certain winds
no shelter was to be obtained between Portsmouth on the
one hand and the Downs on the other. Newhaven had
not been developed into a port, nor had even a light been
placed there. Opposite were the French ports of Cher-
bourg and Havre, with St. Malo, Boulogne, Calais, and
Dunkirk, all within easy access of the trade routes ; all
offered admirable shelter to the French privateer able to
wait a favourable wind and opportunity. The concavity
of the English land-line, especially the long stretch from
Selsey Bill to Beachy Head, the dangerous shore, the
impossibility of weathering a southerly gale upon it at
anchor, and the great want of lights and of convenient
harbourage, all added to the perils to which British ships
congregating there were exposed. If making a large offing
to escape the bay, they ran imminent risks from privateers
which sallied out from the ports of Normandy. LeVille, of
1 Naval Chronicle, ii, 535.
48 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
Dunkirk, one of the most daring of these commanders,
cruising in the Channel in the privateer Vengeance, and
eluding British warships on watch, in five weeks of the
autumn of 1795 made no fewer than twenty English prizes.
The most urgent call for naval ships being about the
British coasts and in the West Indies, the Indian seas were
left unprotected. When Admiral Cornwallis sailed for
Europe with his small squadron in September 1793, a
single sloop-of-war remained to protect the vast expanse
of ocean covered by the commerce of the East India
Company l ; his successor did not reach the station till a
year later. In such circumstances severe losses were
inevitable. They were, however, less severe than might
have been expected. The Indiamen of a century ago were
the monarchs of the seas, stout ships of 800 to 1,200 tons,
some reaching 1,500 tons, fast sailers, better armed and
manned than any others flying the mercantile flag, and
capable of giving a good account of themselves in an
encounter with any interfering craft short of an enemy
frigate. The East India Company, too, fitted out several
heavily- armed ships to cruise for the protection of trade.
The fleets engaged in the commerce carried on with the
West Indies in sugar, coffee, rum, and other colonial
produce — and in this connection slaves must not be
omitted — offered an easier prey for the larger class of
French privateer fitted for long voyages and ocean service,
and facilitated raids upon the traffic to and from the West
Indies, varied with irruptions upon the routes to India.
To such attacks on commerce, the more daring of the
French corsairs — men like the famous Robert Surcouf,
of St. Malo — devoted their restless energies.
The fine spirit in which these attacks were met by British
merchant seamen is manifested in the records of a hundred
actions fought about the islands out in the Atlantic. This
one is typical. The British ship Planter, in the year
1799, was overhauled by a fast sailer. Captain John
Watts, her "commander, backed his mainsail and laid by
for the enemy, all hands giving three cheers. " We found
her," he says, " to be a privateer of twenty-two guns,
twelves, nines, and sixes, with small arms in the tops, and
full of men. We poured in our lagrische, and used grape-
shot with great success." The privateer sheered off to
1 Brenton's Naval History, i, 340.
CH. i] ACTIONS WITH PRIVATEERS 49
repair damage. The action recommenced, and was fought
with great gallantry throughout the afternoon till the
light waned. Captain Watts adds in a letter to his
owners :
" At last he found we would not give out, and night
coming on, sheered off and stood to the south-west. Our
fire must have done great execution. My ship's company
acted with a degree of courage which does credit to the
flag. I cannot help mentioning the good conduct of my
passengers during the action : Mr. McKennon and Mr.
Hodgson, with small arms, stood to their quarters with
a degree of noble spirit ; my two lady passengers, Mrs.
McDowell and Miss Mary Hartley, kept conveying the
cartridges from the magazine to the deck, and were very
attentive to the wounded, both during and after the action,
in dressing their wounds and administering every comfort
the ship could afford, in which we were not deficient for a
merchant ship. When he sheered off we saw him heaving
dead bodies overboard in abundance. We had four killed,
eight wounded. The force of the Planter was twelve
9-pounders and six 6-pounders — forty- three men." l
It was the common object of a privateer-captain wherever
possible to effect a boarding. The advantage lay with him
in his superior numbers of men, trained in the use of arms
and excited by the prospect of a prize, while the merchant-
man's crew was generally weaker, and many a bloody fight
was waged on the narrow decks. A letter from Barbadoes
of December 1st, 1798, describes such an action, fought
most gallantly, and in this instance successfully, by the
Liverpool ship Barton (Captain Cutler), after being over-
hauled twenty leagues to windward by a French privateer
mounting eighteen guns, 9-pounders and 6-pounders. The
chase lasted two and a half hours, the privateer repeatedly
altering her course to board, but the heavy and well-directed
fire from the British ship prevented her from getting near
enough to effect her purpose. Dismantled in her rigging,
the enemy sheered off.
" But having refitted, commenced a second attack at noon,
with a most sanguinary design of boarding, and notwith-
1 Naval Chronicle, ii, 250.
50 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
standing the incessant cannonading from the ship, ran
plump on board, and endeavoured to throw her men into
her, but found her well prepared to receive the enemy,
the whole of Barton's crew being assembled on the quarter-
deck, and headed by their gallant commander, who was
spiritedly seconded by his passengers. An attack, sword
in hand, commenced, and the enemy were driven back with
considerable loss, many of them being spiked from the
netting and shrouds of the ship, while by a well-directed
fire from the cabin guns, numbers were swept from their
own deck ; and a great part of her rigging being cut away
she dropped astern and gave over the contest, amidst the
victorious huzzahs of the British tars, whose bold com-
mander, calling from his quarter-deck, defied the van-
quished Republicans to return to the attack. His
passengers bear a proportionate share of the honour with
the captain." 1
After such adventures in the open sea many a stout
merchantman returned to port, badly mauled, for repairs,
but ship and cargo saved by the dauntless conduct of
officers and crew.
The geographical position of the French West India
Islands favoured the operations of the raiders, affording
bases into which prizes could be taken, and from which
cruisers and privateers could sally out quickly upon the
trade routes, besides offering shelter and opportunity for
refitting. Around these islands the war on commerce was
carried on with ever-increasing British losses, and the
necessity of protecting this trade involved the detachment
of large numbers of frigates and sloops which were badly
needed for service elsewhere. The seizure one after
another of all the French islands eventually checked the
depredations, though it was found impossible to stop them
altogether. Driven from their own lairs, French privateers
fitted out in American ports, whence they sailed under a
thin disguise to resume their predatory warfare upon
British merchantmen.
The guarding of the long ocean routes to India and China
offered far greater perplexities to the British Admiralty.
As the years went on, the French made ever more deter-
mined efforts to cut our trading connections, strengthening
1 Naval Chronicle, i, 437.
CH. i] A PICTURE OF SEA TRAFFIC 51
their already powerful patrols of cruising frigates and
sloops with ships of the line. The concentration of a
considerable fleet under Rear- Admiral Sir Edward Pellew,
afterwards Lord Exmouth, resulted in the losses being kept
within bounds, but throughout the long war the Eastern
trade routes were the scenes of some of the most desperately
contested actions between British and French frigates and
our armed merchantmen and raiding privateers. The need
for protection of the large British trade with the Baltic
and that with America were other causes which made
necessary the dissipation of British naval strength over
many distant seas.
When all has been said, however, the area of the
gravest peril was the waters about our own coasts, for there
the greatest part of our commerce borne by the merchant
fleets necessarily congregated. Mahan has drawn in lively
fashion a picture of the seas in Napoleonic times :
" Fast frigates and sloops-of-war, with a host of smaller
vessels, were disseminated over the ocean, upon the tracks
which commerce follows and to which the hostile cruisers
were therefore constrained. To each was assigned his
cruising-ground, the distribution being regulated by the
comparative dangers, and by the necessary accumulation
of merchant shipping in particular localities, as in the
North Sea, the approach to the English Channel, and,
generally, the centres to which the routes of commerce
converge. The forces thus especially assigned to patrol
duty, the ships ' on a cruise,' to use the technical expression,
were casually increased by the large number of vessels
going backward and forward between England and their
respective stations, dispatch boats, ships going in for
repairs or returning from them, so that the seas about
Europe were alive with British cruisers ; each one of which
was wide awake for prizes. To these, again, were added
the many privateers, whose cruising-ground was not,
indeed, assigned by the Government, but which were
constrained in their choice by the same conditions that
dictated at once the course of the trader and the lair of the
commerce-destroyer. Through this cloud of friends and
foes the unprotected merchantman had to run the gauntlet,
trusting to his heels. If he were taken, all, indeed, was
not lost, for there remained the chance of recapture by a
52 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
friendly cruiser ; but in that case the salvage made a large
deduction from the profits of the voyage." 1
The unprotected merchantman making his way over
seas covered with friends and foes was a reality ; but this
was not the typical British commerce-bearer. Always there
was the individual owner willing to take the greater risks
in order to earn enhanced profits, trusting to speed and
good luck to avoid capture by the enemy, and crews were
ready for high wage to tempt Fortune on an adventure.
Such vessels were the constant cause of attention by and
anxiety to the patrols which the Admiralty found itself
forced to maintain. But the bulk of British ocean-borne
commerce was not left to the hazard of chance. Convoy
was offered and accepted ; and the merchantmen outward
sailing or congregating near our coasts were mostly gathered
in large fleets. Every such convoy involved delay in the
assembling of the ships ; the speed of the fastest craft
sailing in the company was brought down to that of the
slowest ; and the simultaneous arrival of many ships in
port threw large cargoes upon a choked market, thus
tending to lower prices and reduce profits. It was the
elimination of these effects in the balance-sheet that made
the daring individual voyage so attractive. The evasions
of convoy, and the many losses of ships and seamen
consequent upon them, led to the passing of the Convoy
Acts in 1798 and 1803, which compelled ship-masters to
take convoy and to pay a certain sum for the protection
afforded. The beneficial results were at once apparent in
the fall of insurance rates, and in, what was more important
to the nation, fewer captures of ships and men.
British convoys during the Napoleonic Wars reached
the most unwieldy dimensions, and the fine spectacle such
as a cluster of sail made at sea was well calculated to rouse
enthusiasm in every British heart. Admiral Sir William
Parker, when a young midshipman in the ORION in 1794,
in a letter to his mother says :
" We left Torbay on the 13th, Saturday, and the next
day were off Plymouth, where the convoy came out to us.
It was the grandest sight ever was, a convoy of six hundred
sail, besides thirty-six line- of -battle ships. The wind was
Influence of Sea Power on the French Revolution, ii, 204-5.
CH. i] CONVOY OF A THOUSAND SHIPS 53
quite fair and a fine evening : as soon as the convoy was
all out, it came on so fine a breeze that we went eight miles
an hour, without a stitch of sail set ; in fact, in three days,
they were all so far to southward that they were out of all
danger ; and so we hauled off. . . . Captain Duckworth
says if I live to be one of the oldest Admirals, it is ten
thousand to one if I ever see so large a convoy carried so
far to the westward, and without the least accident, and
the wind fair enough to bring us back again in so short
a time." i
A stupendous convoy of no fewer than a thousand ships
was gathered in October of the same year in The Belt,
when Admiral Sir James (afterwards Lord) de Saumarez,
on board the VICTORY, sailed with it, homeward bound from
Swedish waters. An eyewitness has described the vast
assemblage in the following passage :
" A scene scTnovel conveyed some idea of the wealth
and power oy the British nation — a most beautiful and
wonderful sight. The day was very fine ; the fleet was
anchored in a close compact body, with the VICTORY in the
centre, bearing the Admiral's red flag at the fore, sur-
rounded by six ships of the line and six frigates, and sloops
disposed for the complete protection of the convoy. The
yacht, with a Swedish flag, containing the Crown Prince
passed through ; the convoy soon after weighed anchor,
when the Royal stranger had the pleasure of seeing them
all under sail and proceeding to their destination, regardless
of the enemies who occupied the adjacent shores." 8
The congregation of so many ships in a single convoy
and a scene like that above described convey a better
idea of the importance of the British merchant fleets a
century ago than any elaboration of figures. Small though
the wooden sailing-ships were, their management required
the signing on of large crews, and the population afloat
was nearly three times as numerous as would be required
to carry the same trade in days of steam-power and
improved mechanical appliances.
1 Phillimore, Life of Admiral Sir William Parker, i, 39-40. .
2 Ross, Memoirs and Correspondence of Admiral Lord de Saumarez,
ii. 214-5.
54 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
The attack by the enemy was not only against ships
and cargoes, but also against the seamen. Happily, the
barbarities which attended submarine warfare, as prac-
tised by the Germans in the European War, were then
unknown. Ships were not sunk at sight, and merchant
sailors — often, as well, passengers, delicate women and
helpless children — left adrift in open boats at the mercy
of the ocean, the gale, and the biting frost, sometimes when
hundreds of miles from land. Spurlos versenken as a policy
of warfare had not been invented. But the merchant
seaman of the Napoleonic Wars was liable to capture and
confinement till the end of the war or exchange, and this
peril was ever present with him when he went to sea. He
knew the risk, and accepted it, as seamen of the Great War
of the twentieth century faced without flinching the far
more serious risks of loss of life by torpedo and shell-fire or
drowning, or maiming by exposure to frost-bite. The prac-
tice of confining captured merchant seamen was adopted
by both belligerents, for in days of simple armaments the
trained merchant seaman was already more than half a
fighting man, and his transformation into an efficient naval
rating was quickly accomplished. The Royal Navy was
largely manned by men recruited from the merchant
ships, so the capture and detention of peaceful seamen
by the enemy served him in a double purpose — by injuring
British carrying trade and by withholding a potential
source of strength from the Navy.
Mention has been made of the large size of the East
India Company's ships, rising to 1,300 registered tonnage,
and in a few exceptional instances to as much as 1,500
tons. Such vessels exceeded the dimensions of a first-class
frigate, and were almost equivalent to a small ship of the
line. Early in the war their armament was increased by
the addition of 1 8-pound ers, and they were able to put
up a good fight with any raiding corsair. These were,
however, exceptions in our carrying trade — a class by
themselves. The traffic between America and Europe
was mostly done in vessels not exceeding 300 tons. From
Macpherson's tables, quoted by Admiral Mahan, it appears
that the ships trading to the West Indies and the Baltic,
between 1792 and 1800, averaged about 250 tons ; to
Germany, to Italy, and the Western Mediterranean, about
150 tons ; to the Levant, 250 to 300 tons, with a few
CH. i] TONNAGE OF BRITISH SHIPPING 55
of 500 tons. Even by throwing into the scale the East
India Company's ships (averaging about 800 tons), the
general average of British shipping is reduced to as low
as 125 tons, owing partly to the small capacity of the large
number of vessels engaged in the Irish trade. In 1796
there were 13,558 entries and clearances from English and
Scottish ports for Ireland, and the average size of these
ships was only 80 tons. A similar average is found from
the returns of the Irish trade in 1806. Other indications
in the naval literature of the time confirm the small size
of both our own and enemy shipping. Thus Sir William
Parker, when an active frigate captain commanding a
single ship from the year 1801 to 1811, was in that period
interested in fifty-two prizes, the average tonnage of which,
excluding a ship of the line and a frigate, was 126 tons.1
Vessels engaged in the British coastal traffic were still
smaller ; of 6,844 coasters which entered or left the port
of London in the year 1798, excluding the colliers — which,
as a class, were of larger build — the average size was only
73 tons.2
Such was the type of vessel dotted about the oceans of
the world. The merchant seaman of the day was a much
harried individual, living the life of a fugitive, dreading
not only capture by the enemy, but almost as much capture
by the ships of war of his own country. Ashore or afloat
the trained seaman, so much sought after, was never free
from the attentions of the press-gang, which was the
ultimate method of enforcing compulsory service in the
Fleet on those who tried to avoid it. In the street, in
the tavern, in his own home, the merchant seaman was
marked down for seizure. He had no redress ; the appeal
which was supposed to shield him against injustice existed
only in the letter. At night he was dragged out of his bed,
to be herded with a crowd of others, awaiting distribution
among the King's ships. Close as was the man-hunt
ashore, it was not less keen afloat. The sailors in the
Merchant Service had to run the gauntlet for their liberty
from one end of the world to the other. A British ship-
of-war, falling in with a merchant vessel in any part of the
globe, would unceremoniously take from her the best
seamen, leaving her just enough hands to bring her home.
1 Life of Admiral Sir William Parker, i, 412.
2 Colquhoun's Commerce of the Thames, p. 13.
56 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
As the vessel approached the English shore our cruisers,
hovering in all directions, would take the pick of the
remainder. An old Liverpool sea-captain, in reminiscences
of the closeness of the press in that port, has declared that
such was the dread of the ever-active press-gangs ashore
that homecoming seamen would often take to their boats
on the other side of the Black Rock, that they might
conceal themselves in Cheshire, and many a vessel had to
be brought into Liverpool by a lot of riggers and carpenters,
sent round by the owner for that purpose.1
Many a merchant seaman figuring as "volunteer" was
a pressed man, so described to get him the bounty, and
others, when the emergency arose, volunteered to assure
themselves of the bounty, knowing that they were liable
to be impressed, and that the chances of escape were
remote. Many men hid from the press-gangs while
waiting for the offer of a bounty, which followed after
compulsion had done its best. The importance of im-
pressment in the scheme for manning the Royal Navy
can best be judged from the establishment which was
kept up for this service alone. In 1793-4, the first year
of the long French Wars, when impressment was by no
means at its height, nor was the Royal Navy maintained
at anything comparable to its subsequent strength, there
were three flag officers, twenty-nine captains, fifty-four
lieutenants, employed in the impress service, with over
4,000 men — and on occasions many more.2
The rigour which marked the impressment on some
occasions when men were badly wanted for the Royal
Navy — and the want was never satisfied — is sufficiently
illustrated by two quotations from the newspapers of
the day :
" The impress service, particularly in the metropolis,
has proved uncommonly productive in the number of
excellent seamen. The returns at the Admiralty of the
seamen impressed on Tuesday night amounted to 1,080,
of whom no less than two-thirds are considered prime
hands. At Portsmouth, Portsea, Gosport, and Cowes, a
general press took place the same night. Every merchant
ship in the harbour and at Spithead was stripped of its
1 Gomer Williams, The Liverpool Privateers, p. 320.
2 Steel's Navy List, 1 794.
CH. i] THE WAR AFTER TRAFALGAR 57
hands, and all the watermen deemed fit for His Majesty's
service were carried off. Upwards of 600 seamen were
collected in consequence of the promptitude of the mea-
sures adopted. . . . Government, we understand, relied
upon increasing our naval force with 10,000 seamen, either
volunteers or impressed men, in less than a fortnight, in
consequence of the exertions which they are making in all
the principal ports. . . . Several frigates and gun-brigs
have sailed for the Islands of Jersey and Guernsey, with
impress warrants." l
14 The impress on the Thames on Saturday, both above
and below the bridge, was the hottest that has been for
some time ; the boats belonging to the ships at Deptford
were particularly active, and it is supposed they obtained
upwards of 200 men. . . . The impressed men, for whom
there was no room on board the ENTERPRIZE on Saturday,
were put into the Tower, and the gates shut to prevent
any of them effecting their escape." z
The epoch of fleet actions between the British and French
navies closed with the victory of Trafalgar. England had,
thanks to her isolation by sea and her naval supremacy,
maintained her independence and enlarged her Empire,
while on the Continent State after State was tumbling to
ruin and vassalage. Yet the cost had been a heavy one.
Her merchant shipping had undergone devastation, though,
thanks to the activity of her shipyards and her own
wealth, the losses were more than made good. In the
struggle lasting over twelve and a half years, broken
by one brief interval of peace, England had lost some
6,500 ships by capture. In the single year 1797 the
statistics show 947 vessels captured — a number, happily,
far higher than in any other year, and only approached in
1799, when the captures are returned at 730. In the
single month of June 1797 no fewer than 106 ships were
placed upon the lists of prizes taken from us.
Trafalgar signalised the beginning of a yet more
intense attack upon Britain's ocean-borne commerce.
Napoleon, defeated in his efforts to oppose British naval
strength at sea, despoiled of all hopes of effecting such a
naval concentration as should make the invasion of
England a practicable task, sought other means to accom-
1 The Times, March llth, 1803. 3 Ibid., May 9th, 1803.
58 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
plish the downfall of his chief adversary. The Berlin and
Milan Decrees of 1806 and 1807 aimed to shut out from
the Continent all British commerce, and, by causing wide-
spread ruin at home, to undermine the strength of the
great Power against which, on sea and land, he had fought
in vain. The Emperor, unable to keep a ship at sea except
for such a time as it could elude the stronger forces of his
opponent, declared a blockade of Great Britain. The
British Ministers retorted by the famous Orders in Council
which forbade all neutral vessels to trade between the
ports belonging to the enemy and his allies, and sought
to divert the world's trade through England. From
Trafalgar onwards the French fleets, though continually
enlarged, never deliberately attacked, and at sea, as in
the earlier Revolutionary period, the struggle again became
that of a guerre de course.
It was conducted with the extraordinary thoroughness
and vigour which Napoleon, enjoying complete mastery
over France, was able to employ in all his schemes.
Nothing was permitted to stand in his way. Under his
impulse the French fleet soon became stronger in material
than it had been since the opening of the war ; and the
new fleet was created with a single object.1
Nelson's one call throughout his commands had been
for more frigates — always more frigates. The larger
number of them were employed on the protection of trade,
and the shortage of cruising- vessels with the battle fleets —
whose eyes they were — due to this cause, had a marked
influence on many of the most important engagements.
With the disappearance of fleet actions, the smaller ships
were able to give less divided attention to trade protection,
but there still remained work for the larger vessels. The
French, for instance, detached several ships of the line
to support the determined attacks they made on the Indian
trade routes, and our own squadrons had similarly to be
reinforced. England, after Trafalgar, devoted her chief
energies in shipbuilding to launching increasing numbers
of frigates and sloops. This growth in the number of
cruising-ships actually employed on sea service, whilst
the number of ships of the line remained practically
stationary, is shown in the following table : *
1 Brenton's Naval History.
2 Journal of Royal United Service Institution, April 1913.
CH. i] BRITISH PACKET'S GALLANT FIGHT
59
1804.
1805.
1806.
1807.
1808.
1809.
1810.
1811.
1812.
1813.
1814.
Ships of the
Line
75
83
104
103
113
113
108
107
102
102
99
Cruisers
356
473
551
606
618
684
666
620
584
570
594
The disposition of naval ships for the protection of trade
necessarily underwent considerable modification. Squad-
rons of large frigates were kept constantly at sea, ranging
from Cherbourg to Finisterre ; the coastal trade and the
St. George's Channel were guarded by the smaller craft;
and a string of cruisers kept up communication between
Falmouth and Gibraltar. The work put the greatest
strain upon our seamen, who for yet another ten years
were called upon to maintain their untiring vigilance.
Collingwood, having embarked at Plymouth on the last
day of April 1805, and after Trafalgar assumed the
command in the Mediterranean, never found opportunity
again to set foot in his native country, to which he was
brought home a corpse in 1810.
The story of fights by British merchant crews in defence
of their ships during the fierce attack upon our trade after
Trafalgar is told in hundreds of letters from captains to
their owners. Many of them are addressed from ports
which the ships had safely made, with riddled hull and
shot-torn sails, and rigging telling of the perils safely
passed. Not less frequently, it must be admitted, the letters
bearing the ill news of capture came from some prisoners'
camp. Enemy cruisers were constantly on the look-out
for vessels detached from the large sailing convoys, and
against a well-armed man-of-war the merchantman, with
a lesser weight of metal and ill-trained crew, had small
chance. An Homeric contest, waged successfully against
overwhelming odds, was that between the British packet
Windsor Castle and the French privateer schooner Le.
Jeune Richard. A passenger, writing from Barbadoes on'
October 3rd, 1807, gives the following account :
" We are just landed here after an unpleasant passage
of thirty-seven days, and experiencing one of the most
desperate actions which has been fought in this war,
though, thank God, we have been victorious, and have
cleared those seas of one of the fastest-sailing privateers
60 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
out of Guadaloupe, which had in the last six weeks taken
no less than six fine-running ships — viz., the America and
Clio in company, the Margaret, the Pope, the Portsea, and
another. When we met her she was six days on a fresh
cruise, with eighty-six men, and six long sixes and one
long 32-pounder gun. Our force consisted of six guns,
short sixes, and thirty men, including three passengers.
We lost three men killed and seven wounded, the first
broadside ; but I am happy to say that with the remainder,
in an hour and forty minutes, such was their gallantry,
that they carried the privateer, after killing twenty-six,
wounding thirty, and making prisoners thirty not wounded,
in all sixty prisoners, almost treble the number we had left
for duty. I cannot enter into more detail by this oppor-
tunity, and can only say that if any man has deserved a
token of merit from your Underwriters, Captain Rogers
deserves it in the highest degree. He is a young man, his
first voyage as Acting Captain (the Captain being left at
home), and has therefore nothing but his merit to depend
upon. He was left with only ten men about him for the
last half-hour, rallying them to their duty, with a deter-
mination to carry the prize, which repeatedly endeavoured
to clear from the packet, but was too fast lashed by her
bowsprit to escape, and he boarded her at the head of four
men, and charged her deck, with a gallantry never excelled
and seldom equalled. The officers of the man-of-war here
are astonished when they look at the two vessels and their
crews, and instantly in the handsomest manner relinquished
all claim to the prize." 1
Instances of such actions fought by British merchantmen,
when practically every ship was armed for its defence,
might be recorded indefinitely. It must suffice to mention
the gallantry, both in defence and attack, of the little
Falmouth packet Antelope, when chased off the Cuban
coast by the French privateer Atlante. The packet carried
a crew of twenty-three men, and had no better armament
than six 3-pounders, but she had several passengers on
board, who assisted in loading the guns with grapeshot,
buckled on cutlasses, and primed their muskets. The
privateer's first broadside at close range killed the Ante-
lope's captain and the first mate. Her second mate having
1 Gomer Williams, The Liverpool Privateers, p. 410.
CH. i] A CORNISH BOATSWAIN'S PRIZE 61
died of fever a few days before, she was left without a
senior officer. John Pascoe, the boatswain, took com-
mand of the ship, and the French, having boarded, were
attacked with such vigour that they were hurled back to
their own ship, leaving their captain run through the body
dead, and several of their crew killed or wounded. Again
and again the privateersmen attempted to board, but at
each trial they were driven back by the desperate defence.
Realising that they had " caught a Tartar " and that the
ship was too hot for them, the French endeavoured to cut
the grapplings and make off, but the Antelope lashed her
foreyard to the enemy's shrouds, and poured in grape and
musket-ball at point-blank range. Pascoe, daring every-
thing, then determined to carry his enemy, and had
collected a boarding party, who raised lusty cheers pre-
liminary to the assault, when to their surprise the Atlante's
red flag at the mainmast and the ensign at her peak were
hauled down. The British merchantmen made their
prize, and safely brought both ships into port at Jamaica.
The privateer had twenty-eight killed and nineteen
wounded, more than the entire number of the Antelope }s
crew and passengers when she went into action.1
It fortunately was customary, both on the French and
British side, that after a fight at sea the prisoners taken
should be well treated. A privateer, unable to bring his
prize into port, would at times hold a ship to ransom,
accepting the captain's acknowledgment on the part of
the owners, and such arrangements were honourably
fulfilled. In one letter of complaint of ill-treatment a
British captain declared that it was " disgraceful to a
polite nation like the French." This compliment of being
" a polite nation " was frequently paid to our determined
enemy. The chivalry of the sea is illustrated by many
instances in the long wars. The British ship Sally, having
fought the French privateer VAmelie off the entrance to
the Bristol Channel, and having been carried by boarding,
the crew were allowed to preserve the whole of their private
property, and given such comforts as the privateer afforded.
Captain Lacroix promised the English commander his
liberty and the first ship of little value that he should take,
and he was, in fact, sent home in a captured Dundee brig
with all his men and the brig's crew and passengers, a
1 James Howe, History of Flushing, Cornwall, pp. 26-9.
62 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
bargain having been struck that he should obtain the
exchange of an equal number of French prisoners-of-war,
to be sent from England to France. The French captain
further declared that if the exchange were honourably
made he would set free on the first opportunity every
Englishman whom the fortune of war should throw into
his power.
No royal road to preventing losses among our shipping
was ever found, and year after year, until peace in 1815
crowned the titanic efforts of a nation almost exhausted
in the struggle, the tables of statistics tell their own certain
tale. By immense effort, continuously sustained by a
Royal Navy which increased each year in strength of
fighting ships, in guns and in personnel, the losses of
merchant ships, in the ten years after Trafalgar, were so
checked that they were not greater than in the corre-
sponding earlier period. And it must be recollected that
for a year and a half during that period hostilities with the
United States added a heavy quota to the depredations
of French privateers. The British merchant ships were
pygmies compared with the leviathans that cross the seas
to-day. Individually their loss counted for much less,
but the large numbers taken each year, in a war waged
continuously for twenty years, placed a strain upon the
trade and resources of the nation which only the gigantic
edifice of Britain's world- wide commerce, built up upon
solid foundations of individual enterprise and served by a
stalwart, seafaring race, could have borne.
Our ocean-borne trade, attacked with untiring persist-
ence throughout two decades of war, was the chief object
sought out by the French naval ships and the larger
privateers, but it by no means represented the whole body
of British commerce exposed to sea peril. England was
at the same time served by great numbers of small sailing-
ships, which conducted the coastal trade round the British
Isles and that between our island colonies ; and these lines
of shipping were peculiarly open to raids by the enemy.
Many such vessels undoubtedly swell the lists of captures,
and they have complicated the tables of contemporary
statistics, vitiating the conclusions drawn from them, both
by their presence there and by their absence ; for a large
proportion of the coastal ships figure on no return, and
the vast bulk of commerce which they carried, and of
CH. i] LOSSES OF COASTAL SHIPPING 63
which the enemy took toll, escaped observation, as the
clearances made are but imperfectly recorded.
Any estimate of losses among the ships trading from
port to port around the coasts can only be made by
inference, but there are abundant indications that these
losses were severe. In a southerly gale blowing along the
English south coast, ships-of-war guarding the Channel
found themselves compelled to run for Portsmouth or the
Downs, leaving the slower-sailing merchantmen, heavily
laden, without protection or without harbourage about
the long stretch of dangerous shore, and open to attack
by French privateers putting out from Cherbourg, Havre,
and Dieppe. The Frenchmen, well aware of the system
pursued by our cruisers, and enabled constantly to keep
to windward of them, found the merchantmen an easy prey
in these conditions. They came out in the wildest weather,
in which, far too often for our welfare, they achieved their
greatest successes.
Mixed with the ocean traders beating up- Channel was a
not inconsiderable coastal trade, and at the Thames mouth
this was joined by a still larger stream of small vessels
making the journey along the east coasts of Scotland and
England to London. There being no inland waterways,
and the main roads being wholly insufficient to carry the
burden of traffic, London received, not only the great
exchange of commerce which made it the trading centre
of the world, but also the bulk of its own supplies from the
sea. At every hour of the day and night long lines of
ships, numbered by thousands in all, stretched from
Orfordness to the far north of Scotland, and from Selsey
to Ramsgate. In the Thames estuary hundreds con-
gregated at every tide, passing on their way or waiting to
go up or down the river, or taking advantage of the shelter.
Given a dark night, a fair wind, often a fog, and a daring
enemy was rarely without an opportunity for attack, the
quick seizure of a prize, and safe escape. Of such oppor-
tunities he made full use. " With a fleet surpassing the
navy of the whole world," complained a writer in the year
1810, " and by which we are enabled to set so large a
proportion of it at defiance, we cannot guard our coasts
against insult."
In addition to the cruising frigates and warships watching
the French shore, our own coasts swarmed with brigs,
64 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
sloops, and cutters, kept ready for instant action in every
harbour and inlet, whose duty it was to patrol and to
protect the coastal traffic. So numerous were these that
at one period there were 149 stationed between Southend
and Orfordness ; 181 between the Thames mouth and
Hastings ; 138 from Newhaven to Poole ; 21 at Liverpool,
Glasgow, and Greenock ; 114 on the coast of Ireland ;
and the long stretch from Yarmouth to Leith was protected
by 135 craft.1 Yet in spite of the utmost vigilance the
losses continued. The public indignation at raids effected
within sight of our coasts was expressed in the letter of
another writer, who declared that the audacity of French
privateers occasioned universal indignation and regret.
" Our merchantmen captured before our eyes — the national
colours of our enemy floating, with gasconading insolence,
along our shores, and effecting their escape with impunity,
is, indeed, too much for an Englishman's reflection,
accustomed as he is to behold the vanquished streamers of
the foe waving in submission beneath his country's flag."
The French privateers engaged in these depredations
upon the coastal traffic were mostly the smaller vessels
which swarmed in the harbours of Dunkirk, Calais, Bou-
logne, and Dieppe. Any craft could be made to serve,
provided it had speed. The provision of a gun or two, a
few hands collected from the desperate riff-raff of the ports,
the very minimum of provisioning, and all was ready.
Little was risked by the owners, whose craft was worth no
more than the proceeds of one or two fortunate voyages.
The crews, it was true, ran the chance of capture and of
pining in an English prison, but the reward, quickly earned,
was an ample incentive. Luggers, sloops, fishing- smacks,
with a single gun placed on board, even open row-boats,
played their part in the service ; and though individual
prizes might be of small value compared with those made
by the ocean-going corsairs, together they amassed a very
considerable sum. A privateer, stealing out at dusk
before a long winter's night, might with fortune return
with its prize before the next day's sun was high.
Naturally the headlands, such as Portland, Beachy
Head, Dungeness, and others, were favourite places for
attack, and not infrequently those watching from the shore
1 Hannay's Short History of the Royal Navy, ii, 440.
2 Naval Chronicle, xxiv, 460.
CH. i] FRENCH PRIVATEERS' DARING 65
were witnesses of some smart bit of " cutting out " which
the British naval forces were powerless to prevent. Util-
ising the British flag — a frequent ruse — and moving on the
skirts of the assembled shipping, a daring raider in full
daylight would make prizes and get clear away under the
very eyes of watching seamen. But night was, of course,
the most favourable time, and the very severe losses of
trade in the winters immediately before and after Trafalgar
led to the introduction of a system of watching, by appointed
cruisers, each harbour and outlet on the French coast,
thus blockading the privateers seeking to dash out from
the ports between Cherbourg and Dunkirk ; but, notwith-
standing this vigilance, many continued to slip through
the cordon, as the heavy losses among the British merchant
ships from 1805 to 1810 testify. A complete chain of
watching cruisers to be maintained all along the French
coast was one of the means recommended by the ship-
owners to reduce the tale of losses.1
The French spirit made their men quick to adopt every
ruse. A common peril besetting our coastal trade was
found in innocent-looking fishing-boats, showing their
half-dozen men busy at their work, which lay at anchor
upon, or within, the lines joining headland to headland.
Desperadoes out from Dunkirk or Calais, armed with
nothing more effective than the short-range muskets
of the day, watched the character and appearance
of passing vessels. When night or other favourable
opportunity came they pulled quickly alongside the
unsuspecting merchant ship which, undermanned and
unwatchful, from the scarcity of seamen, was first awakened
to the danger by a volley of musketry, followed by the
clambering of the enemy on the decks. The crews, few
in number, poor in quality, and not paid for fighting,
frequently could offer but slight resistance to an over-
powering assault.2 Typical of French daring was the
capture of a West Indiaman, the Benjamin and Elizabeth,
in 1799, four leagues off Dungeness, in a fog. She was
hailed by a lugger, who, running under her quarter, asked
her if she wanted a pilot. On being answered " No," a man
on board the little craft who spoke good English called on
1 Memorandum on the Protection of the Coasting Trade, presented by
Mr. Greville, 1809.
2 Mahan, .Influence of Sea Power on the French Revolution, n, 208.
66 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
the Indiaman to back her mainyard and surrender, follow-
ing this demand with a volley of musketry, after which
men, swarming on the lugger, boarded her on the quarter.
A sharp fight resulted in the crew being overpowered, and
the prize was headed for France. H.M.S. RACOON came up
on the crossing, recovered the ship, and sank the lugger
with a broadside, all on board going down.1 Tales of the
sort were the common talk in every sailors' tavern.
The total losses to which the British mercantile fleets
and British commerce were subjected during the Revolu-
tionary and Napoleonic Wars have been discussed by
Commander (now Captain) K. G. B. Dewar, R.N.2 It
must be admitted that the material available is far from
satisfactory, owing to various .causes : the incomplete
manner in which statistics were kept ; their not infre-
quently conflicting nature ; the complications introduced
by the recapture of vessels taken by the French, and the
additions of enemy prizes which were diverted to the British
merchant fleets ; and the uncertain evidence concerning
clearances and times of voyages, which require an average
to be assumed. Admiral Mahan estimated the total losses
of British ships in round numbers at 11,000, an annual
average of about 2j per cent.,3 and held that the direct
total loss to the nation by the operation of hostile cruisers
did not exceed 2 J per cent, of the commerce of the Empire.4
The studies of the Naval War College have placed the
losses at double that proportion — 5 per cent.6 Low as
his estimate is, Mahan qualified and reduced it, adding :
" This loss was partially made good by the prize ships
and merchandise taken by its (Great Britain's) own naval
vessels and privateers. A partial, if not complete, com-
pensation for her remaining loss is also to be found in the
great expansion of her mercantile operations carried on
under neutral flags : for, although this too was un-
doubtedly harassed by the enemy, yet to it almost entirely
was due the volume of trade that poured through Great
1 Naval Chronicle, ii, 162.
2 " What is the Influence of Overseas Commerce in the Operations of
War, etc." Printed in Journal of the Royal United Service Institution,
April 1913.
3 Influence of Sea Power upon the French Revolution, ii, 223.
* Ibid., ii, 226.
5 Official Memorandum, by Sir Julian Corbett.
CH. i] ESTIMATE OF BRITISH LOSSES 67
Britain to and from the Continent of Europe, every ton
of which left a part of its value to swell the bulk of British
wealth. The writings of the period show that the injuries
due to captured shipping passed unremarked amid the
common incidents and misfortunes of life ; neither their
size nor their effects were great enough to attract public
notice, amid the steady increase of national wealth and the
activities concerned in amassing it." l
The duties levied upon cargoes of neutrals who were
forced to enter our ports, by the Orders in Council framed
as an answer to the Berlin and Milan Decrees, certainly
assisted Great Britain in bearing the cost of the war ; but
it is straining the meaning of words to comprise such traffic
within the ambit of British wealth. Mahan claimed, in
particular, that the British returns of British losses at sea
were larger than those made by the French, but that result
is probably due to the very inefficient manner in which
the French returns were compiled, and the omission of
colonial captures.
Without entering into detailed examination of statistics
on which there is ground for disagreement, we may cite
the table (p. 68) compiled by Commander Dewar as
affording an approximate indication of the intensity of
the attack on trade during the war.
Neglecting the year 1793, the average column (IV) works
out at 5*6 per cent. As, however, ships must on the
average have cleared more than once a year, the number
of ships must be considerably overestimated, and the
percentage of captures in Column IV correspondingly
underestimated. On the other hand, a large number of
captures included ships engaged in the coastal trade, and
if the tonnage of the coastal shipping were added to
Column III, the percentage of captures would be
decreased.
Returns of the coasting trade were not made until 1824.
It was a vital part of our commerce in an epoch when the
bulk of the distribution of merchandise throughout the
British Isles was done by water, and the many hundreds
of small sailing-ships continuously engaged in this traffic
traded with a comparatively small number of ports. To
1 Influence of Sea Power upon the French Revolution, ii, 227.
68 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
BRITISH MERCHANTMEN CAPTURED 1793-1812
By Commander K. G. B. Dewar, R.N., Journal of the Royal
United Service Institution, vol. Ivii, No. 422.
I
II
III
IV
Year.
British
Merchant-
men cap-
tured.
Clearance of British
Shipping engaged in
the Foreign Trade.
Percentage of Captures to
British Ships engaged in
Foreign Trade (assuming
One Clearance a Year).
Tons.
Per Cent.
1793
352
1,240,000
3-8
1794
644
1,382,000
6'2
1795
640
1,145,000
7*5
1796
489
1,254,000
5'2
1797
949
1,103,000
11-5
1798
688
1,139,000
6'9
1799
730
1,302,000
7'5
1800
666
1,445,000
6-1
1804
387
1,463,000
3'5
1805
507
1,495,000
4'6
1806
519
1,486,000
4'7
1807
559
1,424,000
5'2
1808
469
1,372,000
4-6
1809
571
1,531,000
5-0
1810
619
1,624,000
5'1
1811
470
1,507,000
4'3
1812
475
1,665,000
3'8
AUTHOR'S NOTE. — The accuracy of this table cannot be
guaranteed, but it affords an accurate comparison between
the various years. Columns II and III are taken from the
Cambridge Modern History, vol. viii, pp. 485 and 486,
vol. ix, pp. 241 and 242. The average tonnage of ships
employed in the foreign trade in 1802 is taken as 134 tons
(Essays on Naval Defence, by Vice-Admiral P. H. Colomb,
p. 241). Assuming that each ship cleared once a year,
the number of ships employed in the foreign trade is
obtained by dividing Column III by 134.
CH. l]
BRITISH-OWNED SHIPS
69
ignore it, as too often has been the tendency, is to throw
out all the calculations.
Insurance rates may be taken as affording some guid-
ance. They fluctuated violently, and seem to have been
highest in 1805, when two strong French fleets were at
large in the Atlantic ; but it is not without significance
that the average rate of insurance during the long wars
was more than 5 per cent.1
Although, with the materials available, anything beyond
an approximate estimate is impossible, there appear to
be sound reasons for the conclusion that the losses incurred
by British commerce in the great struggle in which it was
engaged a century ago were much nearer to 5 per cent,
than 2 J per cent., as suggested by Admiral Mahan. The
wonder is, not that the proportion was so large, but that
it was not larger, in view of the advantages which lay
with the enemy, possessing many convenient ports and a
large number of small craft.
A table showing the number of British-owned ships during
the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is appended.
It reflects the steady growth of the British Mercantile
Marine in spite of the losses sustained during the years of
war. It will be seen that, mainly owing to activity of
shipbuilding, the numbers increased from 16,329 to 24,860
between 1793 and 1815, the year when peace was con-
cluded.
REGISTERED SHIPS BELONGING TO THE BRITISH EMPIRE DURING THE
PERIOD OF THE NAPOLEONIC WARS
From the Appendix to Minutes taken before the Manning Committee,
1859.
Tear.
No.
Year.
No.
Year.
No.
1793 .
1794 .
. 16,329
. 16,806
1801 .
1802 .
. 19,711
. 20,568
1809 .
1810 .
. 23,070
. 23,703
1795
1796
. 16,728
. 16,903
1803 .
1804
. 20,893
. 21,774
1811 .
1812 .
. 24,106
. 24,107
1797
. 16,903
1805 .
. 22,051
1813 .
. 23,640
1798 .
1799 .
. 17,295
. 17,879
1806 .
1807
. 22,182
. 22,297
1814 .
1815 .
. 24,418
. 24,860
1800 .
. 17,895
1808
. 22,646
1 Cambridge Modern History, i, 241.
70 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
III
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MERCHANT NAVY, 1815-1914
THE British people emerged from the Continental struggle
victorious but exhausted. Famine is the offspring of
war, and it seemed to contemporaries that, although the
supremacy of the seas had been won, economic ruin con-
fronted them. While wages had risen by about 60 per
cent., the price of wheat had gone up by 130 per cent.
Throughout the country the lower classes of the population
had been reduced to a state of privation. In the rural
districts, particularly in the south, the advent of the steam-
engine, and the industrial movement northward, towards
the coal-fields, in association with the economic effects of
the war, had robbed prosperous little towns and hamlets
of the means of livelihood. The conditions had become so
grave that, in the absence of Parliamentary intervention,
local justices felt compelled before the end of the century
to grant allowances from the rates to supplement the low
wages then ruling, the allowances being varied according
to the price of corn. Rural England, largely owing to the
extinction of village industries, was brought to a condition
of misery which had not been known hitherto. The suffer-
ings of the towns were even worse, and distress was wide-
spread. The privations of the mass of people had seemed
to reach a climax in 1811-12, when the harvest failed all
over Europe. The evil was deep-rooted, and did not soon
pass away. Riots, due in the main to the introduction
of machinery at this period of economic disturbance from
the effects of war, contributed to render the outlook so
grave that men feared that industrial unrest would be
followed by national ruin.
Contemporary opinion failed to realise that, in liberating
Europe by the use of sea power, this country had created
the foundations upon which it might build on the ruins
of the war a new and better state of society. Not only
had the supremacy of the seas been gained, but during
the long period covered by hostilities an organisation had
been created to enable the British people to take advantage
of that success, constituting themselves in process of time
the sea carriers of the world. Both the Royal Navy and
the Merchant Navy were stronger when peace was signed
CH. i] A MARITIME POLICY 71
than they had been when it was broken in 1793. The
Merchant Navy had grown in spite of the heavy losses
sustained at the hands of the enemy. In other" words,
as the conflict by sea drew to its close, British sea power,
notwithstanding the risks to which it had been exposed
over a period of two decades and the losses sustained,
rose to a greater strength than it had before attained.
In the opening years of the nineteenth century, the
British people were so impressed with the miseries which
they attributed too exclusively to the war that they were
blind to the promise of prosperity which their sea power
assured them as an island people. They had, in fact,
suffered less in consequence of the long-drawn struggle
than any other people in Europe, owing to the policy
consistently adopted by successive Governments. Ministers
had refused, in spite of temptations, to embark upon a
policy of military expansion which would have drawn
tens of thousands of men away from productive employ-
ment, and in particular from the industries specially
associated with the maintenance of the country's sea power.
Foreign troops were subsidised, but the utmost reluctance
was exhibited to take any step in opposition to the un-
adulterated maritime principles of defence and offence.
Even in 1815, the year which was marked by the overthrow
of Napoleon at Waterloo, the number of men voted for the
British Army was only 275,392. The country reaped the
full advantage of this adhesion to a maritime policy.
While the war was still in progress, and the population of
the British Isles was suffering economically, the work of
industrial reconstruction was undertaken. The develop-
ment of the steam-engine had directed attention to the
vast wealth represented in the coal seams in the northern
counties, and the opening years of the century witnessed
the uprising of the great manufacturing centres which
were to transform England from a country in the main
agricultural into one distinguished by its industrial
pre-eminence. The foundations on which the promise of
the future rested was the supremacy of the Royal Navy
and the strength of the Mercantile Marine.
Merchant shipping is not a basic industry : it produces
nothing. It is, however, the conduit pipe of comrnerce
from market to market. Leaders of public opinion in the
early years of last century failed to realise that a new age
72 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
was dawning, owing to the invention of the marine steam-
engine, which was to contract the world and thus encourage
ocean-borne trade. Yet events were to prove that this
non-productive industry was the most essential element
in the life of a people, living in a group of islands, drawing
their raw materials, in large measure, from oversea, and
relying upon oversea markets for customers to purchase
their goods. British merchantmen became the shuttles
in the great economic loom which was created in the years
following the conclusion of peace by slow and painful
stages and amid much political turmoil. As industry
developed, the Merchant Navy supported it with an
increasing strength that passed almost unnoticed. The
shipping industry in those days owed little to the State ;
it was an individualistic movement, its inspiration and
mobility due to far-sighted and resourceful business men
in the great sea-ports, who devoted themselves to the
creation, as a commercial enterprise, of a great carrying
trade. So long as war continued they had maintained
their sailings, in spite of the action of enemies and the
interference of the press-gang. With the coming of peace,
when the demands of the Royal Navy for men were no
longer paramount, they devoted themselves without
embarrassment to the management of the British Merchant
Navy, which for a hundred years was to prove the lynch- pin
of the industrial movement of the British Isles and the
foundation of British economic strength, for a free sea and
a healthy marine were the bases on which the Free Trade
policy of the latter part of the Victorian Era rested.
Though the nation had preserved its Mercantile Marine
in strength, that organisation was in anything but a
healthy state. The old Navigation Laws — the expression
of a traditional mercantile policy now outgrown and soon
to be changed — were still in force. They confined the
import trade to British ships or ships of the producing
country, restricted to British ships the carriage of mer-
chandise to the Colonies, and reserved the whole of the
coasting trade to British vessels navigated by British
masters, and manned by crews containing at least 75 per
cent, of British subjects. The Navigation Laws limited
competition at a moment when the marine steam-engine
was making its appearance, and the nation was beginning
to understand the advantages it possessed by reason of its
CH. i] A COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY 73
coal-fields. It was apparent to far-seeing men that the iron
ship was about to make its appearance. Even while the
war was still going on, experiments had been made with
iron for the construction of ships, and in 1819 the first
vessel built entirely of iron was completed on the Clyde.
She was intended for carrying coal on the Forth and Clyde
Canal. In subsequent years other experiments were made.
In view of the advent of the steam-engine and the possi-
bility of employing iron in the shipyards in place of wood,
shipbuilders thought it necessary to adopt a cautious policy.
They could well afford to do so, since they were protected
from the full brunt of foreign competition, at any rate so
far as British and Imperial trade was concerned.1 Between
the signing of peace in 1815 and the close of the year 1830,
the British Merchant Navy not only did not increase, but
was thought to have declined slightly both in numbers
and tonnage. The falling off, however, was more apparent
than real. In 1823 Parliament began the task of repealing
the Navigation Laws, but it was one beset with many
difficulties. Further evidence of a national awakening
to the importance of the Mercantile Marine was supplied
in 1836, when a Committee was appointed to inquire
into the causes of wrecks. It became apparent that all
was not well. The Committee reported that the ships
" were so faulty in design and as sailers so slow, that
British shipowners feared free trade because they knew
that successful competition on equal terms with foreign
ships was impossible." The Committee's report contained
the following significant passages :
" That the frequent incompetency of masters and
officers appears to be admitted on all hands, this incom-
petency sometimes arising from want of skill and know-
ledge in seamanship, but more frequently from the want
of an adequate knowledge of navigation, it being proved
that some masters of merchant vessels have been appointed
to command after a very short time at sea ; that others
have hardly known how to trace a ship's course on a chart,
or how to ascertain the latitude by a meridian altitude of
the sun ; that many are unacquainted with the use of the
chronometer, and that very few indeed are competent to
1 The rule as to the employment of English ships for imports was relaxed
in the case of America in 1796.
74 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
ascertain the longitude by lunar observations, while some
are appointed to command merchant vessels at periods
of such extreme youth (one instance is given of a boy of
fourteen, all of whose apprentices were older than himself),
and others so wholly destitute of maritime experience
(another instance being given of a porter from a ship-
owner's warehouse who was made a captain of one of his
ships), that vessels have been met with at sea which were
out of their reckoning by several hundred miles ; and others
have been wrecked on coasts from which they believed
themselves to have been hundreds of miles distant at the
time.
" That drunkenness, either in the masters, officers, or
men, is a frequent cause of ships being wrecked, leading
often to improper and contradictory orders on the part
of the officers ; sleeping on look-out, or at the helm among
the men, occasioning ships to run foul of each other at
night, and one or both foundering ; to vessels being taken
aback or overpowered by sudden squalls, and sinking,
upsetting, or getting dismasted, for want of timely vigilance
in preparing for the danger, and to the steering of wrong
courses so as to run upon dangers which might have
otherwise been avoided.
" That the practice of taking large quantities of ardent
spirits as part of the stores of ships, whether in the Navy
or in the Merchant Service, and the habitual use of such
spirits, even when diluted with water, and in what is
ordinarily considered the moderate quantity served to
each man at sea, is itself a very frequent cause of the loss
of ships and crews. Ships frequently taking fire from the
drawing off of spirits, which are always kept under hold :
crews frequently getting access to the spirit casks, and
becoming intoxicated, and almost all the cases of insub-
ordination, insolence, disobedience of orders, and refusal
to do duty, as well as the confinements and punishments
enforced as correctives, both of which must for the time
greatly lessen the efficiency of the crews, being clearly
traceable to the intoxicating influence of the spirits used
by the officers and men."
The maritime position of the country was unsound.
Many harbours were so shallow that the bottoms of
ships were specially constructed to take the ground. In
CH. i] CONDITION OF MERCANTILE MARINE 75
spite of the fact that some of the officers of the larger
foreign-going ships were men of the highest attainments
and of undoubted reputation, drunkenness and incompe-
tency among officers of average type, as well as the seamen,
were notorious. Ships were provided with inadequate
charts even where any charts were supplied. The Mer-
cantile Marine depended largely on pauper apprentices for
its supply of seamen, and there was no examination of
masters, mates, or engineers, to test their professional
skill. Numerous lighthouses still remained the absolute
property of individuals, or were leased to individuals for
their personal benefit, and surplus light dues went to
so-called charitable purposes and were dispersed through
avenues entirely unconnected with shipping. Harbour
dues, town dues, charity dues, and passing dues
levied on ships were similarly diverted. There were no
harbours which could be described as harbours of refuge,
though a passing toll had to be paid by all ships off
Whitby, Bridlington, Dover, or Ramsgate. The Tyne,
Clyde, and Tees were navigable only by small vessels even
at high-water, and many other ports now nourishing
scarcely existed. " Freight was the mother of wages " ;
payment for salvage of life was unknown ; ships did
not carry side-lights ; no international rule of the road
at sea existed ; neither reports of wrecks nor inquiries
as to the cause of wrecks had been instituted ; crimps
preyed, and preyed unchecked, on British seamen ; there
was no system of recovering the wages or effects of
deceased seamen ; Parliament had not thought it necessary
to make any practical statutory provision as to the
supply of food, or as to the accommodation of seamen ;
there were no checks on the tyranny of masters at sea, and
no provision for the proper execution of contracts between
masters and seamen ; a seaman could not raise any
question as to the unseaworthiness of his ship, but could
be sent to prison as a deserter if he went ashore to com-
plain ; there were no international or code signals.1 That
was the condition of the British merchant fleet at the
time when a Committee was appointed to inquire into the
1 This summarised statement of the condition of the Mercantile Marine
is based on an address at the Mansion House, February 17th, 1887, by
Mr. Thomas Gray, C.B., Assistant Secretary, Marine Department, Board
of Trade.
76 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
causes of wrecks. The investigation showed that the
maritime interests of the nation were suffering, to the
injury of trade and the weakening of the Imperial system.
The Committee emphasised many of the causes of the
decline of the shipping industry which have already been
summarised, and in particular remarked on the increasing
competition with foreign shipowners, " who, from the
many advantages enjoyed by them in the superior cheap-
ness of the materials for building, equipping, and pro-
visioning their vessels, are enabled to realise profits on
terms of freight which would not even cover the expenses
of English ships." The report of this inquiry went a long
way to confirm the statements which had been made by
Mr. Joseph Hume, who from his place in the House of
Commons had declared that the British Merchant Navy was
losing its place among the mercantile marines of the world,
and that it was urgently necessary that Parliament should,
in particular, direct attention to the administration of
lighthouses around the coast and the provision of harbours.
The public attention which was attracted to the state of
the Mercantile Marine at this period at last led Parliament
to pass a succession of acts which, practically for the first
time since the expansion of the country's maritime power,1
recognised the principle that the State had a responsibility
towards the shipping industry beyond that which reflected
the broad economic policy of the country, and that it was,
especially, bound to enforce regulations fonthe protection of
the lives of passengers and seamen. Measures were passed
regulating the conditions under which emigrants travelled,
establishing a registry office for seamen, and transferring to
Trinity House a number of lighthouses which formed part
of the hereditary estate of the Crown, and steps were also
taken to provide better harbours. In 1846 further progress
was made to insure greater safety at sea. It was enacted
that all iron steamers should be divided by watertight
compartments into three divisions ; that all sea-going
vessels should be provided with boats in proportion to their
tonnage ; that steamers should pass to the port side of
each other ; that steamers when within twenty miles of
the coast should carry lights to be prescribed by the
Admiralty ; that passenger steamers should be surveyed
1 The essential fact seems to have been that shipping expanded so
enormously as to render existing regulations out of date.
CH. i] CONSULAR REPORTS 77
half-yearly by surveyors to be approved by the Board of
Trade ; that accidents to steamers should be reported to
the Board of Trade, that department having power to
inquire into the cause of the loss.1
In 1843 fresh light had been thrown upon the condition
of the Merchant Navy owing to the action of Mr. James
Murray, of the Foreign Office, who, at the request of the
Admiralty, addressed a letter to British Consuls abroad
asking them to supply him with information " respecting
the character and conduct of British ship-masters and
seamen." He added in his circular letter that his object
was to show " the necessity for authoritative steps on
the part of Her Majesty's Government to remedy what
appears to be an evil detrimental to and seriously affect-
ing the character of our commercial marine, and therefore
advantageous to foreign rivals, whose merchant vessels are
said to be exceedingly well manned and navigated."
At that time nine separate departments were concerned
in administrating the laws affecting the Merchant Navy,
and there was no central board to co-ordinate the work
of these several authorities, each department being left to
look merely to those interests committed to its charge and
to its own convenience. The reports which were received
fully confirmed the widespread anxiety which was enter-
tained as to the decline of the character of the British
Mercantile Marine. Mr. Murray summed up their general
purport in the following statement :
4 ' It is stated from various parts of the world that persons
placed in command of British ships are so habitually
addicted to drunkenness as to be unfitted for their position,
and it will be seen that Her Majesty's Consuls allude spe-
cifically to the notorious and gross intemperance, and to the
ignorance and brutality of British ship-masters, many of
whom are totally void of education. In several reports it
is stated that there are honourable exceptions to the
unworthy class of masters, thus showing that among
British masters frequenting foreign ports bad conduct and
ignorance is the rule, and intelligence and ability the
exception ; that, on the other hand, foreign masters are
1 This Act is of interest as marking the initiation of a new policy on the
part of the State in its relation to the Mercantile Marine. It has since
been modified.
78 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
educated, sober, intelligent men, capable of commanding
their ships, and that foreign seamen are consequently
more orderly."
Eventually Parliament took action on the lines suggested
by Mr. Murray, and in 1850 the Marine Department of the
Board of Trade was established. In the previous year
the last remains of the Navigation Laws as to foreign trade
had been repealed, to be followed five years later by the
abolition of the restrictions on the coasting trade. Almost
simultaneously, therefore, the protective system as applied
to merchant shipping was abolished, and a special office
created to administer the varied and often contradictory
legislation with reference to the Mercantile Marine which
had been passed since the opening years of Queen Victoria's
reign. Henceforward the confusion which had hitherto
existed with reference to the administration of the laws
relating to shipping was mitigated, and there were many
indications of increased public interest in the industry,
particularly as affecting the safety of passengers and crews.
Mr. Samuel Plimsoll was largely responsible for the
movement of public opinion which occurred in later years.
He directed attention, in particular, to the number of
vessels which put to sea in an unseaworthy condition and
overloaded, having often been heavily insured by their
owners, who thus stood to gain in case of disaster. Mr.
Plimsoll's agitation against " coffin- ships " greatly exag-
gerated the extent of the evil, but the evil undoubtedly
existed. His pertinacity led to the appointment of a
Commission of Inquiry, and the publicity given to the
scandal resulted in the passing of the Merchant Shipping
Act of 1873, giving stringent powers of inspection to the
Board of Trade, and legalising what is now known as the
"Plimsoll Mark" as a protection against overloading.
The evil was scotched but not killed, and the matter
received further attention about ten years later, when
Mr. Joseph Chamberlain, President of the Board of Trade,
introduced into the House of Commons a Bill to provide
for " greater security of life and property at sea." In
moving the second reading of the Bill on May 19th, 1884,
he reverted to the controversy which had arisen as to the
responsibility of shipowners for the abuses which had
undoubtedly existed over a long period. He made it clear
CH. i] THE WORK OF REFORM 79
that he advanced no charge against shipowners generally,
but was dealing only with a minority. He pointed out
that, according to Mr. Hollams, a well-known lawyer, the
law as it then stood declared to the shipowner, " buy
your ship as cheaply as you can, equip her as poorly as
you can, load her as fully as you can, and send her to
sea. If she gets to the end of her voyage you will make a
very good thing of it ; if she goes to the bottom you will
have made a very much better thing of it. . . ." Mr. Cham-
berlain, referring to the Report of the Commission, added :
" The Commissioners pointed out that ' the system of
our marine insurance, while it protects shipowners against
losses which would otherwise be ruinous, tends to render
them less careful in the management of their ships. . . .
The contract of marine insurance is, in its essence, a
contract of indemnity, and the spirit of the contract is
violated if the insured can make the occurrence of a loss
a means of gain.' The Commissioners added that ' our
whole system of insurance law requires complete revision,
for not only does it allow the shipowner in some cases
to receive more than the amount of the loss sustained by
him, but it also, on the other hand, deprives him of an
indemnity in cases in which he ought to be protected by
his insurance.' '
Further important and far-reaching reforms were
introduced towards the end of the nineteenth century,
thus completing the task of revising and codifying the
law relating to the Mercantile Marine which had been
attempted with a large measure of success in 1854.
It may be profitable to turn from this survey of legis-
lation to an examination of the progress of the Mercantile
Marine during these years when British shipping, the
Navigation Laws having been repealed, had to face
world- competition, when some of the burdens imposed
on British shipowners were lifted from them, and when
Parliament intervened to enable the Board of Trade to
insist upon the seaworthiness of ships and the safety of
passengers and crews. In 1875, Sir Thomas Farrer,1
then Secretary to the Board of Trade, prepared a memor-
andum with reference to the " state of British shipping
1 Afterwards Lord Farrer.
80 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
and seamen." He pointed out that " the actual increase
of our Merchant Navy is a most remarkable fact," and in
order to illustrate the progress gave a series of figures
(see below).
Commenting on those figures, the Secretary of the Board
of Trade remarked that they gave a very imperfect re-
flection of the increase in the quality and quantity of the
work done by the Merchant Navy. " The quantity of that
work is to be measured by the number and length of
voyages made and the nature of the freights carried. It
is scarcely possible to get at this accurately, but some
PROGRESS OF BRITISH SHIPPING
Years.
Ships belonging to the British
Empire at the End of Each Year.
Ships belonging to the United
K In^dom at the End of Each Year.
No.
Tons.
No.
Tons.
1818
25,507
2,674,468
21,526
2,426,969
1820
25,374
2,648,593
21,473
2,412,804
1830
23,721
2,531,819
18,675
2,168,916
1835
25,511
2,783,761
19,737
2,320,667
1840
28,962
3,311,538
21,983
2,724,107
1842
30,815
3,619,850
23,207
2,990,849
1850
43,281
4,232,962
25,131
3,504,944
1852
34,402
4,424,392
25,228
3,698,004
1860
38,501
5,710,968
26,764
4,586,742
1862
39,427
6,041,358
27,525
4,860,191
1870
37,587
7,149,134
25,643
5,617,693
1872
36,804
7,213,829
25,083
5,681,963
1873
36,825
7,294,230
24,873
5,736,368
1874
36,935
7,533,492
24,828
5,912,314
notion of it may be found from the number of entrances
and clearances. For the Foreign Trade of the United
Kingdom we can give these. For the Coasting Trade we
cannot, since a large proportion of coasting voyages do
not appear in the Custom House books ; nor can we give
complete returns of the employment of British ships on
the Foreign Trade of foreign countries." In order to
make this point clear, quotation was made of the number
and tonnage of British vessels entered and cleared in the
foreign trade of the United Kingdom (with cargoes and
in ballast) between 1818 and 1874. In the former year
the number of ships was 24,448, with a tonnage of 3,601,960;
in the latter year the number was 73,534 and the tonnage
CH. i] THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 81
30,089,683. It was remarked that, "if complete returns
were available for the coasting trade and for the trade
carried on between foreign ports by British ships, an even
more remarkable indication of the progress of British
shipping would have been possible, since the coasting
trade has been carried on almost exclusively by British
ships." From the statistics given it was evident that,
whilst British tonnage nearly trebled between 1835 and 1874
and more than doubled between 1842 and 1874, the tonnage
entrances and clearances of British ships in the foreign trade
of the United Kingdom in 1872 were about six times what
they were in 1835, and more than four times what they
were in 1842. The explanation, it was pointed out, was to
be found in the increase of steam-vessels, making many
voyages where a sailing-vessel makes but one. Statistics
were quoted by the Secretary to show the great growth
of steam tonnage and the increase in the number of men,
exclusive of masters, in spite of the introduction of labour-
saving devices. The number of men in 1852 was 159,563,
and in 1874, 203,806.
During the period when Parliament was turning its
attention to the condition of the Mercantile Marine the
United States was developing a great sea-carrying trade.
The Americans had not only shown that they could build
the finest and swiftest clipper ships, but in 1814 they
launched their first steamship on the great waters of the
Mississippi, and immediately proceeded to the development
of their internal maritime communications which the new
propulsive agent made possible. With a fine spirit of
enterprise they cultivated their merchant navy by every
practicable means, and by the middle of the nineteenth
century were the most serious competitors of this country
for sea power. By the early sixties the British lead
amounted to little more than a quarter of a million tons.
And then came the Civil War. The North possessed only
a small fighting fleet, and in the emergency the authorities
turned to the Mercantile Marine to supply the deficiencies
in order that economic pressure, by means of a blockade
of the numerous ports of the Confederacy, might be applied
without delay. Warships were improvised, but at a terrible
cost to the Merchant Marine. Prior to the Civil. War,
two-thirds of the foreign trade of the United States was
carried in ships flying the Stars and Stripes. American
82 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
shipping represented 5,250,000 tons. " The extraordinary
character of the emergency demanded that much of this
tonnage should be impressed into the naval and military
services. One million eight hundred thousand tons were
taken, and $100,000,000 withdrawn from the capital em-
barked in the shipping industry. The ALABAMA, the Con-
federate tiger of the sea, destroyed 100,000 tons of shipping,
and caused 'the owners of vessels to seek foreign registries
or tie their craft to the dock, rather than send them unpro-
tected on voyages which were likely to end in the prize
court or destruction by fire at sea. Foreign ships and
foreign capital eagerly entered the industry which the
United States was compelled to abandon.1 From the
damage inflicted upon our Merchant Marine during the
Civil War there has been, as yet, no full recovery ; and
the stupendous increase in our foreign trade is the more
remarkable in view of the fact that it has been effected in
spite of the disadvantage of its conveyance in ships flying
the flags of other nations than our own." '
The American Civil War, coming in the very midst of the
transition from sails to steam, removed the most serious
competitors with whom British shipowners had had to
contend. When in 1875 the Secretary of the Board of
Trade, continuing his examination of the state of British
merchant shipping, investigated the progress of the
British Mercantile Marine in relation to that of other
countries, he was able to paint a gratifying picture. Whilst
the British tonnage in the trade of the United Kingdom
had increased from 65 per cent, of that trade in 1850 to
68 per cent, in 1870, United States tonnage, which had
60 per cent, of the trade of the United States in 1850, had
only 38 per cent, of it in 1870. French tonnage, which
had 41 per cent, of the trade of France in 1850, had only
31 per cent, in 1870. Dutch tonnage, which had 42 per
cent, of the trade of Holland in 1850, had only 28 per cent,
in 1870. Prussian tonnage, which had 49 per cent, of
the trade of Prussia in 1850, had 46 per cent, in 1870.
Swedish tonnage, which had 43 per cent, of the trade of
Sweden in 1850, had only 32 per cent, in 1870. Even in
the case of Norway, whose marine had grown rapidly,
1 An interesting parallel is the blow to English merchant shipping as
the result of the Wars of the Roses.
8 The New American Navy, by the Hon. James Long, former Secretary
of the Navy Dept., U.S.A. (1903).
CH. i] PROSPERITY OF BRITISH SHIPPING 83
Norwegian tonnage, which had 73 per cent, of the trade
of Norway in 1850, had decreased to 70 per cent, in 1870.
44 It was, of course, to be expected," the Secretary to
the Board of Trade remarked, " that when the foreign
trades of the different countries were opened to foreign
ships, the native ships of each country would do a smaller
proportion of that trade, finding their compensation in
the new trades between other countries thus opened to
them. And so it happened in the case of all maritime
countries, except Great Britain. But in her case, with
a trade far exceeding that of any other country, and
increasing more rapidly than that of most countries, her
shipping has not only continued to do the same proportion
of her own trade as it did before the trade was opened to
other nations, but has increased that proportion. Nor is
this all. The foreign trade of each foreign country has
also increased very largely ; and the native shipping of
each foreign country no longer does the same proportion
of her own trade as it formerly did. The proportion which
native shipping no longer does must be done by ships of
some other flag ; and though we have no complete figures
to show how much of the trade of each of these countries
is done by the British and how much by other foreign
flags, we have some evidence to show that the British
flag comes in for the lion's share of it."
Summarising all the evidence which he had been able
to collect, the Secretary of the Board of Trade came to
the conclusion that "it is abundantly evident, not only
that British merchant shipping has, in the twenty years
succeeding the repeal of the Navigation Laws, enjoyed
its due proportion of the increase in the trade of the world,
which has followed on free trade and the use of steam,
but that it has obtained much more than its due pro-
portion, and has outdistanced many of its once-dreaded
competitors. Having special advantages in the possession
of coal and iron, and having the mechanical genius to
turn these advantages to account, it has led the way, and
secured itself, not only the largest share of the carrying
trade of the world, but the most valuable part of that trade."
The legislation affecting shipping which was passed
during the latter part of the nineteenth century was
opposed to the political sentiments of the time. State
interference with trade, either by land or by sea, was
84 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [en. i
regarded with suspicion and distrust. It was felt that
Parliament was treading dangerous ground in attempting
to regulate industry. A powerful impulse from without
was necessary in order to secure Parliamentary action,
even to assure the safety of passengers and crews. Ship-
owners generally were no doubt guiltless of the gross
charges which were levelled against them as a class by
those who were stirred to action by the abuses which
existed in some ships of the Mercantile Marine. The
scandals may have been due to the neglect or criminality
of the minority. Practically everyone who was concerned
with financing and managing the Mercantile Marine
opposed the earlier legislative measures, believing them
to be harmful to an industry which had hitherto been
individualistic. However exaggerated the statements may
have been which were made by Mr. Joseph King, Mr.
Samuel Plimsoll, and others — and most agitations are
based on ex-parte and overcoloured assertions — it cannot
be doubted that, had it not been for the intervention of
such public- spirited men and the success with which they
played on public sympathy, little would have been done
by Parliament ; or, at any rate, action would have been
indefinitely postponed. On the other hand, the pressure
of uninstructed public opinion in the country led to the
passing of measures without due consideration of details,
and a succession of amending and consolidating Shipping
Acts was required to unravel the tangle created by the
legislation carried in the years of agitation. The move-
ment was not continuous, nor was it always wisely directed,
but its general effect was good. Stage by stage, important
powers were conferred on the Board of Trade. Its
Marine Department is a modern development, created
to meet modern needs ; its duties, though numerous, are
clearly defined and restricted. It is concerned mainly
with the security of life and property at sea, and has had,
directly, no share in the upbuilding of the Mercantile
Marine. The strength of the Merchant Navy has always
depended in the main upon the enterprise and business
ability of the shipowning community in meeting the nation's
needs without State subvention or State encouragement.
The passage of merchant shipping legislation between
1880 and 1885 was succeeded by a further period of great
prosperity for British shipping. Freights, both homeward
CH. l]
BRITISH TONNAGE IN 1914
85
and outward, with some fluctuations, continued high,
reaching their maxima in 1889. The prosperity of the
industry was reflected in the output of new ships. At the
turn of the century freights fell, pointing to over-produc-
tion, and this was reflected in the orders placed in the
shipbuilding yards. On the eve of the outbreak of war
in 1914, the earning capacity of shipping had for six years
shown a gradual but healthy improvement, with the
result that fresh capital was invested in the industry. Even
shipyards throughout the United Kingdom benefited from
this recovery, and in 1913 were responsible for nearly two-
thirds of the world's new construction in spite of the
activity in Germany.
At the outbreak of war the British Mercantile Marine
was the largest, the most up-to-date, and the most efficient,
of all the merchant navies of the world.1 It comprised
nearly one-half of the world's steam tonnage (12,440,000
tons out of about 26,000,000 tons net), and was four times
as large as its nearest and most formidable rival — the
German Mercantile Marine. The tonnage owned by the
principal maritime countries of the world on June 30th,
1914, is shown below :
Per Cent.
44.4
3-5
47^9"
11-9
4-6
4.4
4-2 .
4-0
3-5
3-4
16-1
100-0
NOTE —This table was prepared for the Departmental Committee on
Shipping and Shipbuilding, Cd. 9092. The steam tonnage of the three
Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden, and Denmark) amounted together
on June 30th, 1914, to 2,185,000 tons net, or to 8-4 per cent, of the world s
steam tonnage.
1 This review of the strength and development of the British Mercantile
Marine is based, in large measure textually, on the Report of the Depart-
mental Committee on Shipping and Shipbuilding, Cd. 9092.
* These figures do not include United States vessels engaged in trade
on the Northern Lakes (1,693,000 tons).
British Empire :
United Kingdoi
Dominions and
Total
Germany
United States1
Norway
France
Japan .
Netherlands
Italy .
Other Countries
Total
n
Colon
STEAM- VESSELS
Tons Net.
. 11.638.000
ies .
*
902,000
12,440,000
3,096,000
1,195,000
1,153,000
1,098,000
1,048,000
910,000
871,000
4,179,000
. 25.990,000
86 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
The tonnage of the United Kingdom consisted mainly
of vessels large enough for ocean voyages. If the dividing-
line between ocean-going and other vessels is taken at
1,000 tons net (or 1,600 tons gross), it will be found that
90 per cent, of the tonnage of the United Kingdom was
made up of vessels of the larger type. The number and
net tonnage of steam- vessels (a) of less than 1,000 tons,
and (b) of and above 1,000 tons, which were on the Register
of the United Kingdom at the end of 1913 were as follows l :
(a) Steam- vessels of less than 1,000 tons net
(b) Steam-vessels of and above 1,000 tons net
No.
8,855
3,747
12,602
Net Tons.
1,100,000
10,173,000
11,273,000
It is thus evident that the nation was dependent for
supplies and trade on a comparatively small number of
vessels of great size — the secret of success in peace and
danger in war. Vessels of large size are generally more
economical than smaller vessels, but in war their loss is the
more severely felt proportionately as their number is limited.
The enemy's submarine warfare became vital the moment
it began to attack the larger vessels on a great scale.
Before the war this country led the way in most matters
of shipowning and shipbuilding ; and not least in the
building of merchant vessels of large size. Between the
end of 1910 and the end of 1913 the average size of the
Steam-Vessels on the Kegister of the
U.K. on December 31st.
1910
1913
No.
Net Tons.
No.
Net Tons.
Of 1,000 and under 2,000 tons net
Of 2,000 and under 3,000 tons net
Of 3,000 and under 5,000 tons net
Of 5,000 tons net and above
1,370
1,569
630
148
2,138,000
3,878,000
2,324,000
994,000
1,134s
1,599
804
210
1,751,000
4,001,000
2,975,000
1,446,000
3,717
9,334,000
3,747
10,173,000
1 In the more detailed survey of the position of the British Mercantile
Marine before the war, the shipping of the United Kingdom, which repre-
sented 93 per cent, of the Empire's shipping, is generally referred to, the
reason being that detailed statistics were not always available for the
remainder.
a The reduction in the number of ships of less than 2,000 tons exactly
corresponded with the increase in the number of vessels of and above
3,000 tons.
CH. i] TONNAGE AND SPEED 87
" ocean-going" steam- vessels on the register of the United
Kingdom increased from 2,500 to 2,700 tons net, a
significant movement.
It is not necessary to make any detailed comparison
between the British and other mercantile marines as
regards the size of vessels employed. The average size of
steam- vessels of and above 100 tons gross (or about 60 tons
net) is a rough index to the kind of trade in which the
vessels of the respective countries were principally
employed ; and the average tonnage of such vessels which
were on the Register on June 30th, 1914, is accordingly
shown below :
Net Tom. Net Tons,
United Kingdom . ,350 France . . 1,100
Germany . . . ,500 Denmark
Italy . . . ,400 Norway
Japan . . ,300 Russia .
Netherlands . . ,300 Sweden
800
750
700
600
The high average tonnage of German and Italian vessels
indicated that their trades were almost wholly ocean, and
indeed liner, trades. This was true also, though in a lesser
degree, of Japan and Holland. The low average tonnage
of Danish, Norwegian, Russian, and Swedish vessels was
equally significant for the converse reason. This comparison,
moreover, does less than justice to the United Kingdom,
because British ocean-going tonnage alone was more than
three times as large as the entire German Mercantile Marine.
The British carrying trade before the war was divided
between the regular lines with scheduled sailings, which
traded on defined routes, and owners of vessels engaged
in general trade, or " tramp " owners, whose vessels were
often chartered to third parties, and traded wherever a
cargo might be found. It is impossible, however, to state
how much tonnage was allocated at a given time as between
44 liners " and 44 tramps." The Lines ran passenger
vessels and also cargo vessels, generally of a higher type
and speed than ordinary tramp vessels, but there was
always a class of vessel on the border-line between 44 liners "
and 44 tramps " which might be of service in either capacity,
as occasion required. The only available index of the
importance of tramp tonnage is that afforded by the speed
of the vessels. Particulars given in Lloyd's Register
88 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
indicate that, of the steam tonnage owned by the
British Empire on June 30th, 1914, 35 per cent, was
capable of maintaining a sea speed of 12 knots or
more ; and probably all vessels of that speed were liners.
It may be estimated roughly that, of the total tonnage
of the United Kingdom before the war, 60 per cent,
consisted of tramps and 40 per cent, of liners.
The importance of the tramp-owner in the shipping
economy of the Empire cannot be too much emphasised.
" Not only was he responsible for the larger part of
our steam tonnage, but we were dependent on him for
the import and export especially of what may be termed
the rougher class of bulk cargoes, which are not as a rule
suitable for liner business. It would be impossible for
a country like the United Kingdom, with its enormous
flow of trade, to depend wholly on regular lines with
scheduled sailings." l It had been recognised for many
years that it was essential that there should be a large
amount of " loose " tonnage capable of supplementing
the liner sailings, and prepared to trade at short notice
to any part of the world. " Yet, precisely because of his
ubiquitous presence, the tramp-owner's difficulties," the
Committee on Shipping and Shipbuilding remarked, " were
the least easily denned and met, and he was peculiarly
susceptible to any serious modification of the conditions
under which shipping is usually carried on." 8
No account is taken of sailing tonnage. Its importance
was small. The disadvantages of ships dependent on
wind and weather had become obvious. Already the
carrying-power of sailing-vessels of a given tonnage was
incomparably lower than that of steam- vessels of equivalent
tonnage ; and the error due to the omission of sailing
tonnage from any estimate of the world's carry ing- power
is almost negligible. In 1890 the United Kingdom
possessed 3,000,000 tons of sailing-vessels ; by 1900 the
amount had declined to a little over 2,000,000 tons, and
1 Committee on Shipping and Shipbuilding, Cd. 9092.
2 The speed of vessels of foreign countries did not, on the whole, compare
favourably with British vessels. The proportion of Norwegian vessels
of 12 knots and above was insignificant, but the number of Norwegian
liners was small. Only 23 per cent, of German steam tonnage was
capable of maintaining a sea speed of 12 knots or more, and yet the
German trades were pre-eminently liner trades, their tramp interests
being small.
CH. i] THE WORLD'S ECONOMIC EXPANSION 89
by 1913 to 850,000 tons. A similar, though a somewhat
less rapid, decline, due to the supersession of sailing craft
by steam and other self-propelled vessels, occurred in
the case also of other countries.
During the twenty-five years or so preceding the war
there was an enormous expansion of the world's sea-borne
commerce, and, consequently, of the world's tonnage, which
trebled in volume. " In the twenty years up to the end of
1913 there were built some 25,000,000 tons of steam
shipping, of which two-thirds was built in the United
Kingdom and over one-half for the British flag. The
world's shipbuilding had increased progressively from
some 700,000 tons net in 1894 to an average of about
1,000,000 tons net a year in the period 1894 — 1903, to
1,500,000 tons net a year in the period 1904 — 1913, and
to 2,000,000 tons net in 1913 itself. Those figures
illustrate the growing demand for shipping that followed
the world's economic expansion before the war." l In
that period the steam tonnage of the United Kingdom
was more than doubled ; but, even so, its rate of increase
was proportionately not so rapid as that of certain
other countries — notably Germany — whose steam tonnage
increased fourfold. The fact that the volume of British
shipping did not grow at the same relative rate as that of
some other countries was thus explained by the Committee
on Shipping and Shipbuilding :
" (1) It was not to be expected that the United Kingdom
could maintain its great relative preponderance in the
world's carrying trade in face of the enormous economic
expansion taking place in such countries as Germany and
the United States, and the opening up of new markets in
all parts of the world. It is not surprising that the
smaller mercantile marines should have expanded more
rapidly than the powerful Mercantile Marine of the United
Kingdom, more especially in view of the maritime efforts
of most countries in the period. It is noteworthy that,
if actual as opposed to relative growth be considered, no
foreign country even approximated to the United Kingdom.8
1 Committee on Shipping and Shipbuilding, Cd. 9092.
9 The growth of Germany's mercantile marine was proportionately much
more rapid than that of the United Kingdom ; but whilst between 1900
and June 1914 the United Kingdom added 4-3 million tons to its steam
tonnage, Germany added only 1'75 million tons.
90 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
44 (2) Great as was the expansion of the world's tonnage
in the twenty-five years before the war, the expansion of
the world's power of transportation was even greater,
owing to the superiority, first of steam over sailing ships,
and then of improved types of steamships over the older
types. The carrying-power of the United Kingdom
proportionately to the tonnage on the Register increased
more rapidly than that of other countries. In any appre-
ciation of the maritime position of this country before the
war, this factor cannot be overlooked."
The world's shipping was undergoing a continual process
of renewal and replacement in the years preceding the
outbreak of war. Immediately before the war, the
average annual rate of expansion of the world's steam
tonnage as a whole was rather less than 5 per cent, of
the tonnage on the Register. The output of new tonnage
amounted to rather over 7 per cent, of the tonnage on
the Register ; and it may therefore be inferred that about
2 per cent, of the world's shipping was every year lost or
broken up.
Nearly one-half of the world's shipping, as has been
above indicated, was on the Register of the United King-
dom. If the Mercantile Marine of the United Kingdom
be taken by itself, it will be seen that the process of devel-
opment in its case was widely different. In the years
immediately before the war the steam tonnage of the
United Kingdom increased by not more than 2j per cent,
annually. But it is significant that some 600,000 tons
net, or nearly 5 J per cent, of the total tonnage, was every
year removed from the Register for one reason or another.
Two-thirds, or 400,000 tons, was sold to foreign flags,
the amount accounted for by vessels lost or broken up
averaging only 150,000 tons. On the other hand, additions
to the Register of the United Kingdom in the years
1911-13 averaged about 863,000 tons a year, of which
93 per cent, comprised vessels newly built.
This transfer of large numbers of older British vessels
to foreign flags was of great importance in connexion with
the development of the Mercantile Marine. Our ship-
owners were thus afforded a ready market for the disposal
of vessels no longer satisfactory to them as a preliminary
to the ordering of new vessels better suited to their
CH. i] RENEWAL OF BRITISH SHIPPING 91
purpose, and the merchant tonnage of foreign countries,
as a whole, was older, and therefore less efficient, than the
tonnage of the British Mercantile Marine.
As a result of this process of sale and replacement,
85 per cent, of the tonnage on the Register of the United
Kingdom at the end of 1913 had been built since 1895,
including 68 per cent, built since 1900, and 44 per cent,
built since 1905. The following table shows the distri-
bution of our steam tonnage according to age at the end
of 1913 l :
1890 and earlier
1891 to 1895
1896 to 1900
1901 to 1905
1906 to 1910
Since 1910
Net Tons.
724,000
930,000
1,979,000
2,718,000
2,614,000
2,308,000
11,273,000
Per Cen
6-4
8-3
17-6
24-1
23-2
20-4
100-0
In this short survey no account has been taken of
those personal factors which, whilst an indispensable
element of success, are the most difficult to appraise. " The
initiative and enterprise of shipowners and shipbuilders
were a vital element in the building up of the greatest
carrying trade that the world has ever seen. A further
element of success, on which it is impossible to lay too
much stress, was the skill, efficiency, and seamanship of
the officers and men who manned and navigated our vessels
in peace, and who during the war have, by their courage
and devotion, insured the maintenance of our sea-borne
trade." 8
A statistical basis for estimating the size and char-
acter of the target exposed to enemy attack on the outbreak
of war in 1914 is supplied by the calculations on p. 92.
There is a discrepancy between these figures and the
aggregate tonnage of the Mercantile Marine as recorded
by the Board of Trade in its general statement of the
strength of the Merchant Fleet. This is due to the
exclusion from the table which follows of a large number
of small vessels, yachts, and inland navigation vessels,
which are all counted in the official enumeration of tonnage
1 Statistics of the age of the merchant tonnage of other countries do not,
on the whole, compare favourably with those for the United Kingdom.
2 Cd. 9092.
92 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
over 100 tons net. The smaller tonnage — of sea-going
trading- ships — was the asset which the nation had at its
disposal when the Great War occurred. Even this reduced
figure may be analysed with profit. The Annual Naviga-
tion Statement included, under the description of Home
Trade, not only vessels employed in the coasting trade of
SAILING AND STEAM VESSELS EMPLOYED IN TRADING*
In the Home
Trade.
Partly in the Home
and Partly in the
Foreign Trade.
In the Foreign
Trade.
Total.
Number
of
Vessels.
Tons
Net.
Number
of
Vessels.
Tons
Net.
Number
of
Vessels.
Tons
Net.
Number
of
Vessels.
Tons
Net.
Sail
Steam
1,867
2,038
143,335
495,619
37
326
4,783
599,615
177
3,791
275,414
9,650,401
2,081
6,155
423,532
10,745,635
Total
3,905
638,954
363
604,398
3,968
9,925,815
8,236
11,169,167
the United Kingdom, but also those trading with the
Continent of Europe between the River Elbe and Brest
inclusive, and it failed to distinguish between the vessels
employed in these two trades. But the tables published
in 1913, to show the progress of merchant shipping,1
made this distinction, the number as on April 3rd,
1911, being :
Foreign Trade within Home limits
Coasting Trade . . . ' .
459 steamships
1,565
2,024
The 2,024 steamships above referred to included only
the vessels which on April 3rd, 1911, had crews on board,
and if allowance be made for the ships which were not in
commission on the given date, it is probable that in 1911
there were in all about 2,200 steamships employed in these
two trades. The number of steamships so employed
remained practically the same in 1913, being made up of
2,038 vessels described as employed in the Home Trade,
and about one-third of the 326 vessels employed partly
in the Home and partly in the Foreign Trade.
1 Annual Statement of the Navigation and Shipping of the United
Kingdom for the Year 1913, Cd. 7616.
a Ibid., Cd. 7033.
CH. i] BRITISH TRADE IN 1914 93
The total number of steamships which on December 31st,
1913, were engaged in Foreign Trade was therefore about
4,500, made up as follows :
(1) In Foreign Trade outside of Home limits :
Solely employed . . . .3,791 steamships
Partly employed, say . . . 209 „
4,000
(2) Foreign Trade within Home Trade limits :
say 500 steamships
4,500
The matter may be carried a stage farther.1 In the
oversea trade the steamships of under 1,000 tons net
were employed principally to trade with the Continent
within Home Trade limits, ports on the western coast
of France, and the Baltic ports; on ocean voyages the
steamship of under 1,000 tons net is of little account. Of
the 2,038 steam-vessels employed in 1913 in the Home
Trade, only 54 were of over 1,000 tons net. Of the 326
steam- vessels employed in 1913, partly in the Home Trade
and partly in Foreign Trade, 177 were of over 1,000 tons
net. And of the 3,791 vessels employed in 1913 in the
Foreign Trade, 3,444 were of over 1,000 tons. The total
number of steam- vessels of over 1,000 tons net belonging
to the United Kingdom on December 31st, 1913, was
therefore 3,675, and the nature and employment of these
vessels was as under :
STEAM- VESSELS OF OVER 1,000 TONS NET EMPLOYED IN TRADING
Number. Tonnage.
Home Trade 54 64,820
Partly Home and partly Foreign Trade . 177 529,204
Foreign Trade 3,444 9,443,838
3,675 » 10,037,862
The number of vessels belonging to the United Kingdom
had not increased on the date of the outbreak of war in
August 1914, although the aggregate of the tonnage may
have slightly increased since December 1913. Of the
vessels of importance in the Ocean Oversea Trade, the
number belonging to the United Kingdom was, therefore,
1 Report by the Secretary of the Liverpool Steamship Owners' Associa-
tion, October 1915.
2 The average size of these vessels was 2,731 tons net.
94 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
on the outbreak of the war, 3,600 steam-vessels of over
1,000 tons net, their tonnage being 10,000,000 tons net.
Those steamships were classified under two heads — first,
the vessels trading in regular lines on fixed routes ; and,
secondly, the general traders going wherever cargo offered.
The liners numbered about 1,200 and the general traders
about 2,400. The average size of the liner was 3,500 tons
net, representing about 5,800 tons gross ; and that of the
general trader about 2,400 tons net, or about 4,000 tons
gross.
It would be an error to assume that before Parliament
began to evince an interest in merchant shipping no control
of any kind was exercised over the design and construction
of vessels. Early in the seventeenth century Lloyd's
Coffee-House had become the recognised headquarters of
maritime business in London, and especially of marine
insurance. " There, whether on the initiative of the pro-
prietor or the frequenters, were kept certain records of
shipping, termed ' ships' lists,' which contained an account
of vessels which the underwriters who met at the house were
likely to have offered to them for insurance." This coffee-
house proved the foundation of a corporation which was to
exercise a widespread and beneficial influence on the de-
velopment of the industry. The Register became the guide
to the insurer who was asked to risk his money, and ship-
owners who wanted to insure on advantageous terms found
it to their advantage to meet the views of the underwriters
when placing their orders for vessels to be built. In 1760
the underwriters established a society for their protection,
and issued a register which came to be known as the Green
Book. It was supported exclusively by underwriters, and
was intended for their sole use. At the end of the eight-
eenth century the shipowners, who had long objected to
the classification of their vessels at the uncontrolled
discretion of the body of underwriters, started the
Red Book, which was virtually a shipowners' register.
Not until 1834 were the competing interests led to
make an arrangement under which Lloyd's Registry of
British and Foreign Shipping was established, a committee
being appointed, consisting of eight merchants, eight
underwriters, and eight shipowners, with the chairman
of Lloyd's and of the General Shipowners' Society as ex-
officio members. The general principle of classification
CH. I]
LLOYD'S REGISTER
on which the Registrar was to act was to assign characters
which should be as nearly as possible " a correct indication
of the real and intrinsic quality of the ship" ; the practice
of classing vessels according to place of build or the
decision of the surveyors was to be abandoned, and all
characters were to be granted only by the Committee
" after due inspection of the report of the surveyors and
the documents which may be submitted to them." It
was not until several years later that Lloyd's Register
obtained an assured position, and was able to exercise
a compelling influence on ship-construction.
In the meantime, the industry was undergoing a revolu-
tion. First, the marine steam-engine had made its appear-
ance ; and, secondly, experiments in building ships of
iron instead of wood gave rise to a controversy which
divided the shipowning class into different camps, and
interfered with the efficient discharge by the Registry
of its responsibilities towards underwriters, merchants,
and shipowners. Experience with the steam-engine had
to be acquired and a new class of seamen educated. Later
on, when the iron ship took the waters, a somewhat
similar situation developed. During those years of tran-
sition the control exercised by Lloyd's Register was
subject to fluctuations, and it was only gradually that a
volume of experience was built up, enabling the Society
to lay down definite rules calculated to protect the interests
of those intimately associated with the industry and to
satisfy the natural concern of the nation at large — particu-
larly that part of it accustomed to travel by sea — for
the safety of ocean-going vessels. Lloyd's Register, in
process of time, became the supreme arbiter in ship-con-
struction, not only in this country, but, to a large extent,
abroad.1 In the first instance, the plans of vessels and
of boilers of steamers for which the Society's classification
is sought are sent for approval. Clearly, if a vessel is in-
1 Lloyd's Register is the oldest Society of this description in the world.
Next to Lloyd's Register in point of antiquity conies the Bureau Veritas,
of Paris, founded in 1828. The Norske Veritas, of Christiania, was founded
in 1864; the Germanischer Lloyd, of Berlin, in 1867; the Record of
American and Foreign Shipping, of New York, in the same year ; the
Registro Italiano, of Genoa, in 1870 ; the Veritas Austro-Ungarico, of
Trieste, in 1858 ; and the British Corporation for the Survey and Registry
of Shipping, with its headquarters at Glasgow, in 1890. In addition may-
be mentioned the Liverpool Underwriters' Registry for Iron Vessels, which
was established in 1862 and amalgamated with Lloyd's Register in 1885.
8
96 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
tended for general trade, no class can be assigned unless
she conforms to the standard of strength set up by the
Rules as requisite for vessels intended to go anywhere and
do anything — though how that strength is attained may
be immaterial. If, however, a vessel is intended for a
special trade, she can receive a class for that trade, if her
scantlings and arrangements are considered suitable,
quite irrespective of the Rules governing the classification
of general traders. The construction of vessels, including
the machinery and boilers of steamers, then proceeds from
start to finish under the Society's inspection, no steel
being used which has not been produced at approved
works and tested at the manufactories by the surveyors
to Lloyd's Register. For the examination of large forgings
to be employed in the structure of the vessels the Society
employs specially trained and experienced men, who
carefully inspect them while in process of manufacture, in
order to detect defects which could not be observed in
their finished state after delivery. Similarly, all heavy
steel castings are carefully tested before they are accepted
for use in a classed vessel. The surveyors see that the
equipment of anchors and chain cables corresponds with
the Rules, and that they have been tested in accordance
with statutory requirements at public proving-houses, all
of which are under the superintendence of the Committee
of Lloyd's Register. Beyond the statutory requirements,
all cast-steel anchors are required to undergo special tests at
the manufactory in the presence of the Society's surveyors.
Finally, detailed reports are sent to headquarters, where
they are examined by the technical staff, being submitted
to the Committee with a view to classes being assigned.1
In any effort to indicate the progress of the British
Mercantile Marine since the opening of the nineteenth
century, it is impossible to ignore the influence which
Lloyd's Register exercised during the critical period when
the industry was undergoing a succession of revolutions
owing to the application of physical science to ship pro-
pulsion, construction, and equipment. Lloyd's Register
was the necessary counterpart to the responsibilities which
were thrown by legislation on the Board of Trade. It
1 " The Classification of Merchant Shipping," a paper read by Mr. H. J.
Cornish, Chief Surveyor to Lloyd's Register, at the summer meeting
of the Institution of Naval Architects, 1905.
CH. i] THE TWO SERVICES 97
may, indeed, be said that, if it had not been for Lloyd's
Register, Parliament would have been unable to take
effective steps to enforce its will. During the sixty years
preceding the outbreak of war, the Board of Trade and
Lloyd's Register, in association with other classification
societies and the shipowners, shaped the valuable economic
and warlike weapon which proved an essential element
to victory when at last the Great War opened.
IV
THE MEN OF THE MERCHANT NAVY
WITH the introduction, in 1853, of a system of continuous
service for the Royal Navy, the relations between the
fighting service and the Mercantile Marine underwent a
radical change. Hitherto, on the first whisper of war,
the Admiralty had exercised its constitutional right to
impress seamen for service in the Fleet. The established
principle was that the Navy should normally be maintained
on a peace footing, and that it should draw additional
men from the Mercantile Marine in order to enable the
men-of-war in reserve to be commissioned. Impressment
was, in fact, the last remaining link in that connection
between the two services the developments of which
have already been outlined. The resources of the
country were large, and down to the close of the
Napoleonic War not only were these islands largely inde-
pendent of overseas supplies for the necessaries of life,
but means of inland transport were so defective that
counties were in large measure self-contained economic
units. The population of the country, in short, could exist
in some measure of comfort even though ocean . com-
munications were arrested and the cumbersome means of
conveying goods on land restricted. The naval authori-
ties were able to exercise their power of impressment with-
out serious injury to national interests. The Mercantile
Marine was not at that time the loom of a great and essential
world commerce, interference with which would mean
starvation for the people of the British Isles and a complete
dislocation of British industry. On the contrary, sea-
borne commerce at the time of the last Great War, which
closed at the beginning of the nineteenth century, was
desirable because it was the foundation of the country's
98 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
internal commerce ; but the British industrial machine
could exist for a long period in spite of the laying up of
large numbers of merchant ships. The naval authorities,
from the earliest times down to the peace of 1815, con-
tinued, without injury to vital interests, to regard the
Merchant Service as a reservoir upon which almost un-
limited drafts could be made for men.
But from the period of the French Revolution onward
the custom of impressing men of the Merchant Service for
the Royal Navy became increasingly unpopular. For
some years prior to the passing of the Reform Bill of 1832,
a strong feeling existed in the country against the Royal
Prerogative, and no sooner was the Reform Act in operation
than expression was given to that feeling. Many Members
were returned to the new Parliament pledged to do all in
their power to procure the abolition of the press-gang,
and the adoption of a system of recruiting for the Navy
less at variance, it was claimed, with the spirit of the British
Constitution. A Bill dealing with the Merchant Service
was accordingly introduced into Parliament, in 1834, by
the First Lord of the Admiralty, Sir James Graham. It
was drawn up with a view to increasing the number of
merchant seamen by improving their position, and to
providing a system of registration which would secure the
services of maritime persons generally in the event of an
emergency. Their identity was to be established by
means of a register ticket, " in conformity with an opinion
expressed by Lord Nelson in a letter to Lord St. Vincent
in 1803, that that system of registration was of great effect,
and, in his opinion, indispensable."1 The Bill as first
drafted was not proceeded with ; but in 1835, the Merchant
Seamen's Act, 5 & 6 Will. IV, cap. 19, was passed, contain-
ing the provisions of the original measure, except that a
register of the names of seamen was substituted for the
personal register at first contemplated. The alteration
was made after much deliberation ; it being finally con-
sidered advisable not to attempt too much in that
direction in the first instance. The full title was " An
Act to amend and consolidate the Laws relating to
the Merchant Seamen of the United Kingdom, and for
forming and maintaining a Register of all the Men engaged
in that Service."
1 Evidence of Sir J. Graham before Manning Commission in 1858, p. 52.
CH.I] SEAMEN AND THE STATE 99
In the same session was passed " An Act for the en-
couragement of voluntary enlistment of seamen, and to
make regulations for the more effectual manning of His
Majesty's Navy" (5 & 6 Will. IV, cap. 24). The
Act reaffirmed the mediaeval principle of compulsion by
giving a " statutory sanction to the power of the King
to call for the services of seafaring men in the event of an
emergency." The policy of the Government, as enunciated
by Sir James Graham, was to maintain the prerogative of
impressment, but " to take every measure which might
render the use of the power of impressment even in
time of war an exception to the rule, based only upon
urgent necessity." Provision was made for exemp-
ting from further impressment men who had once been
pressed, and had served at sea for a period of five years.
This Act was a measure of expediency and compromise,
and the Government, doubtless, were justified for a time
in feeling their way; but, seeing that the system of
impressment was so widely condemned, a grave responsi-
bility was incurred by those in authority in allowing a
quarter of a century to elapse before another recognised
system of providing seamen at short notice was substituted.
Happily, no national emergency arose during the period ;
and, ultimately, the system of registry, with the necessary
machinery, initiated by Sir James Graham's Act, resulted
in bringing the sailor under official control, and afforded
a means of securing his service when occasion required.
This legislation marked the beginning of the end of the
system of impressment, but an old custom was slow to die.
Senior officers of the Navy who had served throughout
the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars were unwilling
to agree to any weakening of the power of the Admiralty
to make whatever claims it deemed fit upon the Merchant
Service in time of war ; and, in point of fact, the right of
the Crown to call upon seamen to serve the State was
never abandoned. What happened was that the intro-
duction on February 14th, 1853, of a system of continuous
service for seamen in the Navy — representing the last word
in that process of specialisation which, as we have seen,
dated from the reign of Henry VIII — gradually provided
the fighting arm of the country with a well-trained
personnel. Prior to this event, it had become apparent
that the Royal Navy and the Merchant Navy were de-
100 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
veloping on different lines. The fighting service was
responding to new demands arising from the application
of physical science to naval warfare, while the Merchant
Service was also undergoing a change in character. The
growth of international commerce was leading to the
foundation of great shipping companies, making regular
sailings over prescribed routes at definite times, and it was
dawning on the authorities that even in war the mainten-
ance of these communications would be essential. Owing
to the rapid industrialism of England and the conse-
quent depression of agriculture, the population was
becoming increasingly dependent on overseas supplies.
In short, the former haphazard manner of manning the
fighting service was unsuited to conditions at sea, which
required that men of the Fleet should be carefully trained
over a long period of years, in order to enable them to
handle the increasingly complicated weapons of warfare
which were being introduced, while the country was
becoming so dependent on oversea supplies that the
possibility of laying up any portion of the Merchant Navy
in order to complete the manning of the Royal Navy
suggested peril.
Before the introduction of long service in the Navy,
attention had been directed to the deterioration of the
personnel of the Merchant Fleet, and no doubt those
revelations were not without their influence upon the
course eventually taken by the Admiralty in providing
the Royal Navy with a body of specially trained men who
engaged to serve continuously, with the prospect of pension.
Reference has already been made l to the circulars issued
from the Foreign Office in 1843 to British Consuls abroad
as to the manning of the Merchant Fleet. In order to
obtain a correct view of the progress of the Merchant
Service between the close of the last Great War and the
opening of hostilities in 1914, it may, perhaps, be of
interest to quote from some of the reports sent to the
Foreign Office, which had their influence on the develop-
ment of the two Services :
" Our merchant seamen are picked up as they may be
found. On discharge no writing of character is given ; on
re -engagement, of course, no such certificate can be
» &fe p. 77.
CH.I] CONSULAR CRITICISMS 101
required. How can the good or bad character of a man
be known ? Certificates may be false, incomplete, not
well drawn up ; but they have been useful in the Navy,
and they might, I imagine, be tried in the Merchant
Service. . . . Competition and low wages, in the maddest
excess, are the order of the day, and, of course, vessels are
worse manned and navigated than formerly." — Gothen-
burg.
" Another very material point to which more attention
should be given is the, more frequent than otherwise,
lamentable condition of apprentices in these small traders,
many of them probably more neglected and ill-used than
a West Indian slave formerly, the interest of the owner
of the latter being more at stake. These forlorn objects
(here again we must not forget exceptions) often seek
relief from their Consul without his being able to afford
it ; for unless some glaring act of brutality is observable,
the unhappy sufferer is sure to be in the wrong, and the
treatment he receives is merely ' deserved wholesome
correction ! ' which power is certainly desirable for
masters to possess. No wonder such apprentices produce
seamen disposed to all sorts of irregularities, and sometimes
captains a very few degrees better. Boys ought not to be
bound without first having been at school, to learn at
least right from wrong, and the rudiments of education
fitted for their station. When out of service they should
be compelled to attend school, and by having their am-
bition awakened, they would thus be prepared for obtaining
the petty officer's or mate's certificate. I know the Marine
Society, Bishopsgate Street ; such establishments, as to
principle, should exist in every port in Britain." —
Danzig.
" The conduct of British shipmasters and seamen in this
port, in general, is very disorderly, specially those belonging
to vessels proceeding from the northern ports— Sunder-
land, Newcastle, Shields, etc. It arises principally from
the rough and uneducated character of both masters and
men ; their great tendency of intoxication ; the facility
of obtaining wine and spirits in this port ; and the little
restraint held over them by the local authorities or power
of the Consulate, in case of misbehaviour, to exercise
control over them.
" During the outward voyage both masters and men
102 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
become irritated against each other in consequence of
harsh and violent conduct shown on one side, and dis-
content, ill-humour, and insubordination, on the other.
Their mutual animosities are, however, in general, sup-
pressed, and kept within certain bounds by necessity
during the time they are at sea. On their arrival in port
their first thought (too generally, of masters as well as
men) seems to be to get drunk. All their animosities then
break out with redoubled violence, and quarrelling,
fighting, and other disgraceful scenes ensue, which bring
discredit upon their country, equally with themselves. . . .
" Motives of economy are, amongst some, a source of
disturbance. On arriving in British ports many masters
discharge almost all their crew, in order not to be at the
charge of maintaining and paying them while they are
in port. They do not fill up their complements until
they are just on the point of sailing again on their outward
voyage ; they are then obliged to take the first persons
they can find, who frequently prove not to be seamen, or
very inefficient men, and often turn out to be very bad
characters, and cause a great deal of trouble." — Con-
stantinople.
" In point of intelligence, address, and conduct, they—
British masters — are the inferior to the American ship-
masters, and, in consequence of their intemperance when
in port, great dissatisfaction is expressed by their crews.
What their knowledge of c practical navigation and
seamanship ' may be, I am not competent to say, having
always preferred, when visiting England, taking a passage
in an American vessel ; but I have observed that desertions
very seldom occur, or only to a limited extent, from vessels
commanded by superior men, while less efficient masters
not infrequently lose their entire crews.
" I have in a former year ascertained the amount dis-
bursed by every British and every American vessel fre-
quenting this port, and the expenditure of the British
was from 30 to 50 per cent, greater than the American.
The British master seldom receives more than £10 per
month whilst afloat, and consequently prefers a long to
a short voyage. The wages of an American master, with
his perquisites, are nearly treble that amount ; he has,
therefore, no inducement to dishonesty to support himself.
The British masters, I have been credibly informed, run
CH. i] BRITISH AND AMERICAN MASTERS 103
up longer bills with the different tradesmen, and after
payment of them, and a receipt in full taken, many articles
are sent back, and the cost of them, as charged in the bill,
refunded to the master ; the inference is, that the owners
of the vessels never receive credit for the articles so re-
turned . ' ' — Savann ah .
" There does not appear to be the same encouragement
extended to British masters as there is to American. The
average wages per month (in this trade) paid to the former
is £8 105., together with the average of his proportion of
the cabin freight, £2, is equal to say £10 10s. per month ;
while to the latter, including all his perquisites, say £20
per month. It is very usual for the American master to
have an interest of an one-eighth to one-fourth in the
vessel under his command, and owners of vessels, being
so convinced that it is to their advantage that the master
should be so interested, frequently give them a share on
credit. As a proof that the character of British shipping
has declined, I would instance the fact, that almost in-
variably, American ships not only obtain a decided prefer-
ence over British ships, but generally a higher rate of
freight." — Norfolk, Virginia.
" If I were to mention the names of those persons whom
I deem unfitted for command, I fear I should include
the whole of the remaining traders to this port. With the
former exceptions (mentioned earlier in the report), I do
not think that a British vessel arrives at Pernambuco with-
out some complaint being made to me from the men, of
brutality, starvation, insulting language, overwork, or
want of sufficient hands. In nine cases out of ten, I am
obliged to decide in favour of the men ; and what is the
consequence ? Why, that armed with no specific powers,
the master laughs at the decision which he himself has
oftentimes invoked ; even here, where the Commercial
Treaty makes Her Majesty's Consuls arbitrators in the
disputes of their countrymen, no powers of enforcing them
are conferred." — Pernambuco.
Mr. James Murray, in a memorandum dated Novem-
ber 22nd, 1847, declared that " the condition of British
Shipping, according to evidence from the ports of foreign
States, may not unjustly be termed discreditable to
this country. No sufficient efforts appear to have been
104 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
made in Great Britain to remedy the existing evils ;
while pains have been taken by foreign Governments, and
with success, to improve the condition of their Mercantile
Marine."
We may turn from the evils so fully illustrated in
these reports, and so clearly emphasised in Mr. James
Murray's memorandum, based upon them, to the related
question of the ineffective control by the State of the
manning of the Mercantile Marine. Beyond the muster
rolls required since 1747, by the Seamen's Relief Act
(20th of Geo. II, cap. 38) and subsequent Statutes, to
be kept on board merchant ships, and the duplicates to
be rendered to the collectors of Customs, in connection
with the Merchant Seamen's Fund,1 no records of the
crews of British vessels were in existence ; and apparently
no statistical use was made of the accounts so rendered.
The only published figures in connection with the Merchant
Service were contained in the Parliamentary Return,
prepared by the Registrar-General of Seamen, subse-
quently of Shipping and Seamen, who was for many
years an officer of the Admiralty, and afterwards of the
Board of Trade, showing the number of vessels, with the
amount of their tonnage, and the aggregate number of
men and boys usually employed in navigating them,
that belonged to the several ports of the British
Empire on December 31st in each year. The Admiralty
had thus but a vague knowledge of the source from which
the Navy was partly manned in time of peace, and from
which it would be recruited in time of war. In short,
the constitution of the Mercantile Marine was a matter
of surmise and assumption, offering no basis for a scheme
by which the supply of seamen could be increased.
1 This was a fund established with a view to granting pensions to seamen.
All seamen were compelled to contribute to it. After a long period of
mismanagement it became insolvent. By an Act introduced by Mr.
Labouchere in 1851, the Government undertook to remove the great
grievance to seamen by winding up the fund at the cost of the country.
The principle adopted was to take all existing assets ; to pay all existing
pensions or claims to pension ; and to allow existing contributors to
continue their contributions with the prospect of a pension. The amount
of future pensions was determined by taking the average of then existing
pensions, which, besides being frequently withheld from want of funds,
differed in amount at the different ports. The difference between assets
and liabilities was paid out of the Public Exchequer. The winding up
ctett thte State aboiit £1,500,(M).
CH. i] SIR JAMES GRAHAM'S ACT 105
In those circumstances the nominal register of the
seamen belonging to the United Kingdom, provided by
Sir James Graham's Act — though, of course, it could be of
no direct service in manning the Navy — was calculated to
be of value statistically. The Act came into operation
on July 31st, 1835 ; and, under it, masters of British ships
were required to deposit with the Officers of Customs at
the several ports of the United Kingdom returns of the
names and description of their crews at the commencement
and termination of voyages, in the case of foreign-going
vessels ; and half-yearly, in the case of Home Trade and
fishing vessels. For the due supervision, scrutiny, and
custody of these documents, sect, xix provided for the
establishment of " The General Register Office of Merchant
Seamen," under the control of the Admiralty. From the
lists of crews forwarded to that office, the name of each
seaman was entered alphabetically into a general register,
with his age, place of birth, previous ship and latest voyage ;
a separate book was kept for apprentices. Besides afford-
ing the Admiralty useful and necessary information
respecting the numbers, ages, ratings, and whereabouts
of merchant seamen, this register proved itself of import-
ance in bringing to light the fact that the law respecting
the compulsory employment of apprentices was largely
ignored.1 It was found that only some 5,000 apprentices
were registered, although the number to be maintained,
according to the tonnage scale, was nearly 14,000. By
the establishment of an office to insure that the laws for
the Increase and Encouragement of Seamen were duly
carried out, a material change was effected ; in seven
years from the coming into operation of Sir James Graham's
Act, more than 40,000 apprentices were registered, being
at the rate of over 5,000 per annum.
The legislation of 1835 was generally understood to be
an instalment only. The Merchant Seamen's Act was
useful, since under its operation there was a continual
influx of young blood into the Service, but it did nothing
directly towards obviating the necessity for impressment.
In reply to awkward questions in Parliament as to what
was to come of the registration, it was officially stated
that " so many more thousand apprentices " served for
a time ; but, in view of promises given, uneasiness presently
i 4 Geo. IV, cfop. 19.
106 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
prevailed at the Admiralty lest the necessity for issuing
Press Warrants should arise before milder and wiser methods
had been tried.
The Registrar-General of Seamen was, in consequence,
called upon by the Admiralty, in October 1838, to state
whether he was " prepared to recommend any measure
to insure the power of procuring a certain number of
men for filling up the ships at short notice." Captain
Brown, R.N., the Registrar-General, at once submitted
his views, setting forth, as the result of his experience,
two remedies for forcible impressment :
41 (1) A general personal registry of all mariners of every
degree, taking minute individual description of each as
to age, capacity, etc., and after rejecting the aged and
incapable from the list, to draught or ballot a certain
number at fixed periods ; the names of men so drawn to
be exhibited at every Custom House, with notice to come
forward, under certain penalties for refusal or neglect,
when called on by Proclamation.
" (2) To form a reserve of men either in one, two or
three classes, which may be distinguished as the ' Naval
Reserve.' "
He pointed out, however, many serious objections to
the first plan, and warmly advocated the adoption of the
second.
The matter remained in abeyance till 1842,1 when, in
connection with the Merchant Seamen's Fund, the question
of establishing a test of identity for each British seaman
was considered by a Parliamentary Committee appointed
to inquire into the working of that Fund. It was at
length resolved to amend the Merchant Seamen's Act, and
to inaugurate a new system of registry, with a twofold
object: first, to benefit seamen by affording them a ready
means of establishing their claims for relief or support
from the Merchant Seamen's Fund ; and, secondly, to
provide for the abstraction of classes of seamen from the
general body, without resorting to indiscriminate impress-
ment. A measure was accordingly prepared, which passed
into law on September 5th, 1844, entitled, "An Act to
1 This was the year in which the Foreign Office, at the request of the
Admiralty, called for reports as to the manning of the Mercantile Marine.
CH. i] THE SEAMAN'S TICKET 10T
amend and consolidate the Laws relating to Merchant
Seamen, and for keeping a Register of Seamen" (7 & 8
Viet., cap. 112). The Act provided for the adoption of the
register ticket, and Sir James Graham declared in the
House of Commons, when the Bill was read a third time,
that this provision formed part of his original intention.
Under the new law, no person, except a master or surgeon,
being a British subject, was to serve on board ship without
a ticket bearing his name and description. This ticket
each seaman was required to deposit with the master of
the vessel in which he engaged when signing articles, and
the master was required to return it to the seaman at the
expiration of his agreement.
The Registrar-General of Seamen was deputed to carry
the measure into effect, and it fell to the Officers of Customs
at the several ports to issue the tickets. Each ticket was
distinguished by a number from " 1 " upwards, and bore
the stamp of the " General Register and Record Office
of Seamen" — the words "and Record" having been
added to the title by the new Act.1 A numerical register
was opened in that Office in which were recorded the
particulars of the men to whom the register tickets were
issued, and their subsequent movements were duly entered
thereon, from the crew lists furnished as heretofore, with
the addition of each man's especial number. To quote
from a report by Captain Brown, dated November 24th,
1847, " the measure as carried into effect became popular
with the seamen, who adopted the opinion that the ticket,
being issued to British subjects only, would prevent
foreigners from usurping their berths." At this time, and
until 1853, no foreigners were allowed to serve in coasting
vessels, and not more than 25 per cent, of the crew in foreign-
going vessels. It also appears from the report that the
measure was generally popular with the shipowners, " be-
cause they considered that the deposit of the ticket with the
masters of vessels during the terms of a seaman's service
gave them a lien upon him which would prevent desertion."
Disappointment ensued, however, when it was found that
1 A further addition to the title of the Office was made in 1872. Under
the Merchant Shipping Act of that year, there was a transfer of
registry work from the Customs, and the Registrar-General of Seamen
became the Registrar-General of Shipping and Seamen. The office then
assumed its present title of the " General Register and Record Office of
Shipping and Seamen."
108 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
the machinery of the Register Office was not "to be
brought to bear upon deserters to procure their conviction
and punishment."
However good the system was on paper, it broke down in
practice ; mainly because there was no direct inducement
for the men to take care of the tickets. The Merchant
Seamen's Fund offered none, as it turned out. For some
time in an insolvent state, owing to gross mismanagement,
it was practically abolished, so far as nine-tenths of the
Service was concerned, by the Winding-up Act of 1851.
The majority of seamen had long looked upon the Fund
with suspicion and disgust : money was stopped from
their wages, and they understood not where the money
went. Thus, having no palpable interest in safeguarding
their identity, it is not surprising that the seamen resorted
to an illegal traffic in tickets, in spite of cautions and
penalties. With the strength of the Mercantile Marine
then ranging from 160,000 to 170,000 British seamen
(exclusive of masters), the issue of over half a million
tickets in the course of six years pointed to the prevalence
of abuses. Indeed, it was stated in evidence before the
Lords Committee sitting in 1848 to inquire into the Navi-
gation Laws " that in the Jews' shops at Shadwell, and
in similar places at Bristol, sailors could purchase as many
register tickets as they wanted, and for half the amount
of the fine that would be asked of them if they went to the
Custom House."
The repeal in 1853 of the Manning clauses of the old
Navigation Laws, which excluded foreigners from serving
in coasting vessels and limited the number to be employed
in foreign-going vessels, made it no longer necessary to
prove nationality at time of engagement, and so did away
with what little value the ticket still possessed for a British
seaman. In the circumstances, there was but one
thing to be done. The functions and powers vested in the
Admiralty under the Merchant Seamen's Act and the
amending Act of 1844 x had been transferred to the Board
of Trade by the Mercantile Marine Act of 1850 (13 & 14
Viet., cap. 93), with full powers to alter or dispense with
the register-ticket system. Acting on these powers, the
Board of Trade formally abolished the system by notice
in the London Gazette of September 30th, 1853.
1 Acts 5 & 6 Will. IV, cap. 19, and 7 & 8 Viet., cap. 112.
CH. i] END OF THE TICKET SYSTEM 109
But the story of the ticket system was not thereby closed.
It was originally framed with a view to restricted impress-
ment (i.e., to calling out merchant seamen of certain ages for
service in His Majesty's ships at short notice), and it was not
till 1853 that an Act was passed empowering the Crown to
call out seamen in classes, according to age, described in
" their register tickets, or otherwise." There was a virtue in
the " otherwise," seeing that register tickets were then no
more. In the absence of the register ticket, resort was
had to the certificate of discharge given to every seaman
at the end of a voyage. It is more than doubtful whether
the provisions of the Act in question, 16 & 17 Viet., cap. 69,
could ever have been enforced by means of this test of
identity ; fortunately, like those of the earlier Proclamation
Act, 5 & 6 Will. IV, cap. 24, they were allowed to remain
inoperative.
Although proved to be unworkable as applied to the
whole Mercantile Marine, the system of individual regis-
tration was not entirely discarded, but for " Fund "
purposes was continued in operation as regards some
12,000 men, to whom special tickets were issued under
the Winding-up Act, 14 & 15 Viet., cap. 102, and for over
fifty years it has been worked with success in connection
with the Royal Naval Reserve. The certificate R V 2,
issued to each member of that force, corresponds to the old
register ticket, with the difference that, whereas the
majority of men had little or no interest in looking after
the latter, the former is as important to a Naval Reserve
man as a Savings Bank Book, guaranteeing to him so
much money for so much drill performed.1
After 1853, however, no attempt was made to revive
the maintenance of an individual or even nominal register
of seamen, except as regards certificated officers, appren-
tices, and Naval Reserve men. The general body of seamen
were dealt with in the Seamen's Registry Office, as mere
numbers ; they were noted in the registers of ships and
their voyages, kept since 1857, and were periodically set
1 A central indexed register of seamen employed in foreign-going vessels
was started in October 1913, in the General Register and Record Office of
Shipping and Seamen, and was found of great use. An Order in Council,
dated August 2nd, 1918, provided that "the Shipping Controller, in
conjunction with the Board of Trade, may make orders relative to the
holding of a certificate of identity and service by every master, sea-
man, or apprentice employed on a British ship, and in relation to
kindred matters."
110 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
forth in the Shipping and Navigation Returns under the
head of " Persons Employed." In addition, the crew lists
containing their signatures and descriptions were filed and
were available for reference.1
The breakdown of the personal test system led to the
consideration of Captain Brown's second plan for procuring
men for the Navy at short notice — viz., the formation and
maintenance of a voluntary Naval Reserve. In fact,
money was voted in the Navy Estimates of 1852-3 for
experimenting with the scheme to the extent of 5,000
men, but owing to a change of Government nothing was
done. The Admiralty, however, were soon to experience
the truth of Captain Brown's dictum that " the means
of augmenting our naval force cannot be extemporised,
but must be preorganised." According to the evidence
of Rear- Admiral Milne and Sir James Graham before the
Commissioners for manning the Navy, in 1858, immense
difficulty was experienced in 1854 in fitting out the Baltic
and Black Sea Fleets. The operation was slow in the
extreme ; small vessels had to be recalled from foreign
stations, and their crews transferred as a nucleus to the
larger ships. Most of the men sent out to the Baltic Fleet
were " very young, and without experience " — landsmen,
in fact. Well might Admiral Sir Charles Napier complain
of the delay in getting his complement of men, and of the
quality of those he did get. It was just the time when a
reserve of seamen would have been invaluable had there
been one. Sailors were urgently needed, and yet the
situation was not sufficiently serious to warrant the issue
of a proclamation, with all the inconveniences attending
bounties and embargoes.2 Even as it was, there was such
a demand for seamen that wages increased nearly 40 per
cent. With shipowners outbidding the Government, as
1 The preparation of the statistics referred to in this paragraph calls
for a few remarks. The first reliable figures were compiled in 1700, when
the Registrars of Shipping in England were required to send in lists of the
vessels on their registers, with the numbers of men usually required to
man them. Registrars in Scotland and Ireland were brought into line
later on. After a long period it was recognised that many vessels on the
register were either laid up, employed inland, or out of existence, so since
1848, only those vessels employed at some time during the year in the
Home or Foreign Trade or in Fishing have been included in the Annual
Statistics. A more detailed analysis of ships and crews has been made
in the quinquennial Census returns compiled since 1891.
1 Cf. Sir James Graham's evidence before Manning Commission in 1858,
p. 63.
CH. i] THE ACT OF 1859 HI
they would have done, wages must have gone up to a
ruinous rate. The lesson then taught the authorities was
not forgotten, and resulted in the appointment of a Royal
Commission in 1858 to inquire into the best means of
manning the Navy. The Commission, presided over by
Lord Hardwicke, favoured Captain Brown's scheme of a
voluntary Naval Reserve. They proposed in their Report
the substitution " of a system of defence, voluntary and
effective, for untrained compulsory service." They were
of opinion that from the Merchant Service could be formed
a force of " thorough seamen, trained in gunnery, and
qualified for immediate service on board a ship of war."
An Act was accordingly passed in August 1859
(22 & 23 Viet., cap. 40) giving the Admiralty power to
raise " Royal Naval Volunteers, not to exceed 30,000
men." The machinery for the establishment of the Force
was ready to hand in the General Register and Record
Office of Seamen and the various shipping offices in the
United Kingdom. Under the Mercantile Marine Act
of 1850, which placed the management of matters relating
to the British Mercantile Marine under the Board of Trade,
Shipping Masters — since described as Superintendents of
the Mercantile Marine Offices — had recently been appointed
to superintend the registry, engagement, and discharge
of seamen, etc., and their status and duties were further
defined by the Merchant Shipping Act of 1854. These
officers were necessarily in close touch with the seamen,
and, acting under the direction of the Registrar- General
of Seamen, were the best possible agents for procuring
volunteers. It is interesting to note that as the first
suggestion in modern times to raise an effective Naval
Reserve originated in 1852 with Captain Brown, the original
holder of the appointment of Registrar- General of Seamen,
so when the scheme was adopted it was found that in that
office, with its records and administrative machinery
throughout the country, lay the hopes of success. Suc-
ceeding Registrars- General — notably Mr. J. J. Mayo, Mr.
H. N. Malan, Mr. John Clark-Hall, and Mr. C. H. Jones-
working in conjunction with the various Admirals Super-
intendent of Naval Reserves (after 1903 Admirals Com-
manding Coast Guard and Naval Reserves), succeeded in
organising out of the personnel of the Mercantile Marine
and the fishing industry a large, dependable, and readily
112 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
available reserve force for the Royal Navy. Certain alter-
native proposals were brought forward or given a trial,
and the Royal Naval Coast Volunteers, established in
1853, continued in existence for twenty years ; but
experience at last confirmed the wisdom of obtaining a
sea-going force, thus giving effect to suggestions made
by leading naval officers of the war period, including
Nelson, who on several occasions urged on the naval
authorities the advisability of fostering the Merchant
Navy as the source of a supply of handy and experienced
seamen for men-of-war in a time of sudden emergency.
The history of the Royal Naval Reserve has been a
chequered one. Officers of the Naval Service who sat on
the Board of Admiralty were apparently impressed increas-
ingly, in process of time, by the wide divergence between
the needs of the Royal Navy and those of the Merchant
Service, as the former responded to the impulse of invention
and developed a demand for men of special training — for
signalling, gunnery, torpedo work, and other duties. At
first the Royal Naval Reserve consisted only of lower-deck
ratings, and there was considerable opposition to the
proposal that officers of the Mercantile Marine should be
included in the Force, but an Act was passed in 1861 provid-
ing for their appointment. It was repealed and fresh pro-
visions were made by the Act of 1863 (26 & 27 Viet., cap. 69).
Captain H. J. Challis, R.N., in his evidence before a General
Committee of the Admiralty and Board of Trade in 1869,
stated that he " objected altogether to the principle that
officers of the Mercantile Marine be employed in the Naval
Reserve," adding that he considered that there was
" sufficiency of naval officers who are well fitted for the
work." Captain Challis evidently reflected the general view
of the Navy at the time.1 For many years the training of the
Force was neglected ; officers and men were relegated
to shore batteries provided only with muzzle-loading guns
after the breech-loader had been adopted for service at sea.
Generally the Service suffered from unintelligent dis-
couragement. " In January 1889 . . . there was not
(except on board the District Coastguard ships) a single
breech-loading or machine-gun used in the instruction of
the Reserve, but early in 1891 we find that fourteen 5-inch
J Even in 1879 Admiral Sir Augustus Phillimore urged that com-
missions " should be confined to a very limited number."
CH. i] TWO NAVAL RESERVES 113
breech-loading guns, one 6-inch breech-loading gun, one
Galling, one Gardner, and sixty-seven Nordenfeldt machine-
guns were so employed. Since then a certain number of
quick-firing guns have been supplied, and, doubtless,
something more has been effected in the direction of
increasing the modern armament, although much remains
to be done." x In spite, however, of inadequate official
recognition, the Force continued to expand from year to
year; Commander W. R Caborne, C.B., R.N.R., and others,
continually kept the subject before the public, and slowly
the conditions of service were improved. At the begin-
ning of the century the Force reached its maximum
strength of ratings, 29,538 (1904). A few years previously
the Admiralty had decided on establishing a reserve force
of its own, to be known as the Royal Fleet Reserve. It
consisted of men of good character who had served for a
term in the Fleet, and who, in return for a retainer, agreed
to keep themselves efficient for service afloat. Even so
enthusiastic a supporter of the Royal Naval Reserve as
Commander Caborne approved this step, though it threat-
ened the force hitherto recognised. He admitted that
" it is obvious, from what has gone before, that the Royal
Fleet Reserve, consisting as it does of men who have seen
long, or at any rate considerable, service in the Royal
Navy and have been thoroughly trained in their respective
duties — trained far better than any other auxiliary naval
body can be in time of peace — must of necessity, so far
as ratings are concerned, be our first and principal stand-by
in time of war for service in the Fleet."
No doubt this was the view taken by the Admiralty,
for in consequence of the success attending the formation
of the Royal Fleet Reserve, and also looking at the fact
that the numbers in the Royal Naval Reserve had reached
probable requirements, recruiting for the latter body was
suspended from December 1904 until October 1906.
The formation of the Royal Fleet Reserve was part of a
wide-sweeping movement for assuring a supply of well-
trained seamen for the Fleet, and the training of the Naval
Reserve was x reconsidered. In his " Statement of
Admiralty Policy " in 1905, the First Lord (Earl Cawdor)
remarked :
1 Lecture on the Royal Naval Reserve, by Commander W. F. Caborne,
R.N.R., May 10th, 1895.
114 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
i4 The arrangements for the drill and training of men
of the Royal Naval Reserve have been recently reviewed
in order to improve the efficiency of this branch of the
Reserves, and also to reduce its cost. Hitherto, Royal
Naval Reserve men have been drilled on board the harbour
drill-ships and batteries established round the coasts of
the United Kingdom, and a certain number have undergone
a period of naval training on board the sea-going drill-
ships, or in ships of the Channel Fleet. This system is,
however, no longer well adapted to the requirements of
the Service, inasmuch as the greater part of the drill has
been devoted to gunnery, a class of duty which is very
unlikely to devolve upon Royal Naval Reserve men in
war, and as (except, perhaps, the limited number of men
who embark for nine months of naval training) they do
not acquire and maintain sufficient knowledge of the
general routine of a man-of-war. The establishment of
the divisions of ships in commission in reserve has now
given an opportunity for affording the Royal Naval
Reserve the training in which they have hitherto been
wanting. These ships have only a portion of their crews
on board, and can therefore accommodate a considerable
number of Reserve men, with advantage both to themselves
and their crews. Although the ships only go to sea for
cruises once a quarter, the general routine is much the
same as when they are fully commissioned for sea service ;
and since they will change frequently, the Reserve men
will have more facilities for becoming familiar with the
internal economy of a modern man-of-war. It has ac-
cordingly been decided that from April 1st next, all drill
at batteries and in harbour drill-ships shall cease, and
the establishments will be closed, except in a few cases,
where the present system will be continued a little longer.
These exceptions are the drill-ships in London, Aberdeen,
Bristol, and Liverpool, and the Royal Naval Reserve
batteries at Penzance, Yarmouth, Wick, Stornoway,
Lerwick, Greenock, Upper Cove, and Rosslare. Under
this new system of training, the men will be expected to
embark in the first year for three months, and thereafter
for one month every alternate year."
The regulations for carrying into effect the foregoing
policy were issued on March 29th, 1906 ; on March 31st
CH. i] IMPROVED TRAINING 115
five harbour drill-ships and five torpedo gunboats were
paid off, and twenty-five Royal Naval Reserve batteries
closed ; and on April 1st, 1906, the new system of training
came into force. Officers of the Royal Naval Reserve
were given the option of drilling at the remaining drill-
stations under the old system for five years from April 1st,
1906, but on promotion they were required to embrace
the new system. Royal Naval Reserve men serving in
the Force on April 1st, 1906, were given the option of
carrying out their drills at the remaining harbour-ships
or shore batteries during their current period of enrolment
or of adopting the new system, but upon re-enrolment
they were required to fall in with the new system. The re-
maining harbour drill-ships and Royal Naval Reserve bat-
teries were finally paid off and closed on March 31st, 1911.
The effect of the formation of the Royal Fleet Reserve
and the change in the system of training Naval Reservists
reacted on the strength of the 'latter force, which, if it
gained in efficiency, lost in numbers, since under the new
system it was less convenient for merchant seamen to put
in their training than was the case when they could go to
a local battery and qualify. Experience confirmed the
Admiralty in its opinion of the new scheme, and in 1910
the First Lord (Mr. Reginald McKenna) announced that
" the training in the ships of the Home Fleet under the new
system is very valuable, and will render the Royal Naval
Reserve Force an efficient portion of the naval personnel,"
as time was to show. In 19 10 a trawler section of the Royal
Naval Reserve was formed, consisting of skippers, second
hands, deck hands, and engine-room hands of trawlers.
The policy of the British Government, which has been
traced in brief summary, was developed, in some confusion,
on the following lines :
(1) To develop the Merchant Service by means of the
Navigation Laws, which were repealed when it was decided
that they were injurious.
(2) To ascertain the number of ships and men belonging
to the Empire by means of the laws for registering ships.
(3) To establish suitable Reserves.
As to the third point, the chief object was to replace
untrained merchant seamen by " gunners with sea-legs,"
116 THE MERCHANT NAVY OF THE PAST [CH. i
which led to the formation in 1872 of the old Second-Class
Reserve, recruited chiefly from the fishing industry.
Here we reach the final stage in the secular relations
between the Navy and the Mercantile Marine. The
nineteenth century saw the complete extinction of the
mediaeval system. Yet within a few years of its extinction
it had begun to be revived on new lines by the formation
of a Reserve drawn from the Merchant Service and in
other ways. And the general conclusion to be noted is that
long before the European War came upon us the Admiralty,
so far from having forgotten the historic connection
between the two Services, was endeavouring to rev ve
it, though to a limited extent only, in a modern form.
As a result of these efforts, when the storm broke in
August 1914, the Admiralty controlled a Naval Reserve
of upwards of 18,000 trained officers and men of the
Mercantile Marine and Fishing Industry, besides nearly
24,000 officers and men of the Royal Fleet Reserve. In
addition, the nation benefited by the ameliorative measures
affecting the personnel of the Merchant Navy, which had
been carried out in the preceding fifty years. Whereas, dur-
ing the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, the constant
preoccupation of the naval authorities was the manning
of the Fleet, as was also the case at the time of the Crimean
WTar, in the summer of 1914 the Admiralty had at its
disposal, in addition to the regular personnel of the Royal
Navy with its own reserve, not only 18,000 R.N.R.
officers and men trained in war duties, but the whole
reformed personnel of the Mercantile Marine, consisting
of some 170,000 men of British birth, a larger number
than at any previous date in British annals, together with
some 100,000 fishermen. At the beginning of August 1914
the strength of Naval personnel was 147,667 ; in November
1918, when the Armistice was signed, it had been increased
by some 200,000 officers and men, in addition to the making
good of a wastage of some 80,000. It was largely from the
170,000 men of British birth belonging to the Mercantile
Marine and the 100,000 men employed in fishing round
the coasts of the United Kingdom that the required recruits
had been obtained. The history of the Merchant Navy's
part in the war reveals the manner in which these men
acquitted themselves in face of dangers unprecedented in
variety and character.
CHAPTER II
ON THE EVE OF WAR
THE position of the officers and men of the British Mercan-
tile Marine on the outbreak of war was an unenviable one.
They had entered the Service, the youngest as well as the
oldest, without a thought that any circumstance could
arise bringing them into conflict with the armed forces of
an enemy in such a manner as to endanger their lives,
although they must have been familiar with the possibility
that their ships and the cargoes carried in them might in
certain conditions be seized in war-time. They had regarded
as adequate for the defence of their lives the generally
accepted provisions of international law, and, for the rest,
had placed their trust in the camaraderie of the sea and
the spirit of mutual helpfulness whfch had grown up during
the latter half of the nineteenth century to be embodied in
regulations universally respected. The sea had to be fought,
and their ships were built to enable them to wage that form
of warfare which all British seamen have conducted with fine
courage from age to age. But their ships, as they knew,
were not constructed for the organised violence of war :
they could not resist attack by gun or torpedo ; and, for
the most part, the merchantman of commerce possessed
inadequate speed ever to permit of escape when pursued.
The tramp, for instance, was designed to conform to
economic conditions, and since coal is expensive, as little
as was compatible with efficient service as a trader was
used to attain a moderate rate of steaming. The sailing-
ship was in a worse case. On the other hand, the leading
liner companies owned ships capable of travelling at higher
speeds, and there were a comparatively few large vessels,
equipped for carrying passengers, with power enabling them
to compete for the " blue ribbon of the Atlantic," to which
route all such ocean greyhounds were confined. But when
those distinctions between the various types of merchant-
men have been admitted, it remains true that not one of
117
118 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
the ships of the British Merchant Navy was capable of
steaming as fast as the latest and swiftest cruisers of the
national fighting fleets of the Great Powers, quite apart
from the other disadvantages from which they suffered.
In these circumstances, merchant officers and men con-
fronted the new conditions, realising their defencelessness,
but with confidence that no developments were probable
during the course of war, when passions become excited,
which would put their lives in danger as defenceless non-
combatants.
The sense of security of merchant seamen had been
strengthened by the discussions affecting the interpretation
of maritime law which had taken place at The Hague, and
later on during the Naval Conference in London. Certain
provisions were accepted without controversy from any
quarter. Wider recognition was given to the distinction
between combatants and non-combatants, and it was
affirmed that all the Powers concerned in these delibera-
tions, though exhibiting differences in approaching some
details, were united in their desire to spare as much as
possible the unprotected merchant seamen, whether of
enemy or neutral nationality, from the sufferings incidental
to warfare in the past. An illustration of the attitude
assumed towards seamen generally during the discussions
is furnished by the remarks of Baron Marschall von
Bieberstein when the subject of the laying of mines was
under discussion at The Hague in 1907. Admiral Siegal,
Germany's naval adviser, objected to a proposal intended
to adjust the diversity of opinion which had been revealed
in the Examining Committee. Sir Ernest Satow, on
behalf of the British Government, followed, contending that
the draft regulations were inadequate as a safeguard to
legitimate neutrals. In effect, he urged amendments in
line with the dictates of humanity. Baron Marschall
von Bieberstein (Germany) intervened, disclaiming that
Germany intended to demand unlimited liberty in the use
of mines or had any desire to " sow mines in profusion in
all the seas." The subject came up later on at the eighth
plenary meeting of the Conference (October 9th, 1908),
when he made the following amplified statement :
" A belligerent who lays mines assumes a very heavy
responsibility towards neutrals and peaceful shipping.
CH. n] GERMAN PROTESTATIONS no
On that point we are all agreed. No one will resort to
such measures unless for military reasons of an absolutely
urgent character. But military acts are not governed
solely by principles of international law. There are
other factors ; conscience, good sense, and the sentiments
of duty imposed by principles of humanity will be the
surest guide for the conduct of sailors, and will constitute
the most effective guarantee against abuse. The officers
of the German Navy, I emphatically affirm (je le dis a
voix haute), will always fulfil, in the strictest fashion, the
duties which emanate from the unwritten law of humanity
and civilisation.
" I have no need to tell you," he continued, " that I
recognise entirely the importance of the codifications of
rules to be followed in war. But it would be well not
to issue rules the strict observance of which might be
rendered impossible by the force of things. It is of the
first importance that the international maritime law
which we desire to create should only contain clauses the
execution of which is possible from a military point of view,
even in exceptional circumstances. Otherwise, the respect
for law will be lessened and its authority undermined.
Also it would seem to us to be preferable to preserve at
present a certain reserve, in the expectation that five
years hence it will be easier to find a solution which will
be acceptable to the whole world. As to the sentiments
of humanity and civilisation, I cannot admit that
there is any Government or country which is superior in
these sentiments to that which I have the honour to
represent."1
That statement, one of many made by the representa-
tives of Germany and other maritime Powers, encouraged
merchant seamen to hope that when war came it would
bear less hardly upon them than past conflicts by sea had
done. Whatever may have been the merits or demerits
of the Declaration of London, it did at least confirm
the belief that hostilities would be conducted in future
with less risk to innocent life.
On one matter, apart from mines, doubt existed as to
the course which Germany would adopt. At the Second
1 Part. Papers, Misc., No. 4 (1908).
120 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
Conference at The Hague, as at the London Conference,
she had stoutly opposed the British proposal, supported
by Japan and the United States, which would have allowed
the arming of merchant ships only in the national ports
and territorial waters of the converting Power, or in ports
and territorial waters occupied by that Power. Con-
version on the high seas would have been prohibited in
the case of all ships. Germany, on the other hand, stood
for the utmost measure of freedom.1
Suspicions were subsequently aroused as to the course
which Germany intended to pursue in the event of war.
In 1912 the Admiralty, in view of information which had
reached it, appointed a Committee to consider the ad-
visability of defensively arming merchant ships. The
Committee favoured a scheme of armament, and in
November of the same year Rear- Admiral H. H. Campbell,
C.V.O., was appointed to carry it out. It was agreed that
the weapons should be mounted aft, so as to be available
only when the ship was trying to escape. This officer de-
termined that nothing should be done to affect the status of
the ships provided with guns, and he decided to place the
administration of the scheme at the three ports selected in
the hands of officers of the Royal Naval Reserve who were
already acquainted with the marine superintendents and
other officers whose intimate knowledge of shipping matters
would enable them to arrange the training of the guns'
crews so as to cause the minimum of inconvenience and
loss to the owners. Liverpool, London, and Southampton
were chosen as bases for the trial of the scheme, because
these ports were used by vessels bringing in frozen meat
from the Plate and Australia.
Admiral Campbell at once got into touch with the leading
shipowners, and attention was turned to the risk of com-
plications abroad which might arise owing to this reversion
to the old policy of the British Mercantile Marine. The
Royal Mail Steam Packet Company was the first i line
to be approached. Sir Owen Philipps, the Chairman of
that company, was so impressed by the situation that he
agreed to fit guns in a number of the company's big
steamers free of expense to the Admiralty, on condition
that guns and ammunition were supplied. On April 25th,
1913, the Aragon, one of the vessels of the Royal Mail
1 The Hague Conference. By A. Pearce Higgins.
CH. n] "KAISER WILHELM'S" GUN MOUNTINGS 121
Steam Packet Company, sailed for South America armed
with two 4-7 inch guns. The patriotic lead given by
Sir Owen Philipps, the Chairman of that line, was not
without its influence on other shipowners, many of whom
promptly took the same course, with the result that the
work of arming a number of the principal food-carrying
ships went forward smoothly and rapidly. In the following
June the Tainui, also armed, left for Australia, and in
July the new White Star liner Ceramic, which during con-
struction had been given two 4 -7 inch guns with shields,
carried out successful firing trials. The Admiralty in the
meantime had given to each of the companies a guarantee
of indemnity against all loss and expense due to any re-
straint or detention of the vessels to which they might be
put in time of peace owing to the ships being defensively
armed.
The task of mounting the guns was carried out by the
owners at their own cost in accordance with the advice
given by the constructive staff of the Admiralty. A system
of training guns' crews was also introduced, and short
experience suggested that, if the higher ratings were trained
in classes, the officers could efficiently train the remainder
of the men at sea.
The whole scheme was making good progress when it
received an impetus from the discovery that the Kaiser
Wilhelm //, one of the North German Lloyd vessels, was
provided with gun mountings. This German liner had had
to put into Southampton for repairs after collision in the
Channel, and evidence was thus obtained that some German
ships, as had been suspected, were fitted to facilitate
conversion on the outbreak of war. About this time,
British visitors who had returned from Kiel stated that
at that naval establishment they had seen storehouses
with the names of German merchant ships painted over
the doors. It was added that German officers had ad-
mitted that in those buildings armament was kept for
a number of merchant ships. Other evidence pointing
to a settled German policy in this respect was reluctantly
received — reluctantly, because it pointed to a new danger
on the trade routes calling for protective measures. On
March 26th, 1913, Mr. Churchill, then First Lord of the
Admiralty, made his annual statement of the Navy esti-
mates, in the course of which he remarked :
122 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
' I turn to one aspect of trade protection which requires
special reference. It was made clear at the Second Hague
Conference and the London Conference, that certain of
the Great Powers have reserved to themselves the right to
convert merchant steamers into cruisers, not merely in
national harbours, but, if necessary, on the high seas.
There is now good reason to believe that a considerable
number of foreign merchant steamers may be rapidly
converted into armed ships by the mounting of guns.
The sea-borne trade of the world follows well-marked
routes, upon nearly all of which the tonnage of the British
Mercantile Marine largely predominates. Our food-carry-
ing liners and vessels carrying raw material following
these trade routes would, in certain contingencies, meet
foreign vessels armed and equipped in the manner described.
If the British ships had no armament, they would be at
the mercy of any foreign liner carrying one effective
gun and a few rounds of ammunition. It would be ob-
viously absurd to meet the contingency of considerable
numbers of foreign armed merchant cruisers on the high
seas by building an equal number of cruisers. That
would expose this country to an expenditure of money
to meet a particular danger altogether disproportionate
to the expense caused to any foreign Power in creating
that danger. Hostile cruisers, wherever they are found,
will be covered and met by British ships of war, but the
proper reply to an armed merchantman is another mer-
chantman armed in her own defence.
44 This is the position," Mr. Churchill added, " to which
the Admiralty have felt it necessary to draw the attention
of leading shipowners. We have felt justified in pointing
out to them the danger to life and property which would
be incurred if their vessels were totally incapable of offering
any defence to an attack. The shipowners have responded
to the Admiralty invitation with cordiality, and substantial
progress has been made in the direction of meeting it, by
preparing as a defensive measure to equip a number of
first-class British liners to repel the attack of armed foreign
merchant cruisers. Although these vessels have, of course,
a wholly different status from that of the regularly com-
missioned cruisers, such as those we obtain under the
Cunard agreement, the Admiralty have felt that the greater
part of the cost of the necessary equipment should not fall
CH. n] STATUS OF ARMED MERCHANTMEN 123
on the owners, and we have decided, therefore, to lend the
necessary guns, to supply ammunition, and to provide
for the training of the members of the ^ship's company
to form the guns' crews. The owners, on their part, are
paying the cost of the necessary structural conversion,
which is not great. The British Mercantile Marine will,
of course, have the protection of the British Navy under
all possible circumstances, but it is obviously impossible
to guarantee individual vessels from attack when they are
scattered on their voyages all over the world. No one
can pretend to view these measures without regret, or
without hoping that the period of retrogression all over
the world, which has rendered them necessary, may be
succeeded by days of broader international confidence
and agreement than those through which we are
passing." l
This decision was welcomed generally in the House of
Commons and in the country. It was declared by Lord
Charles Beresford 2 to be " the most important scheme of
all those announced by the Admiralty, even more important
than building men-of-war," for, he added, " you cannot
build any more than you are doing." Some doubt was
subsequently expressed as to what the status of these
vessels would be in the time of war. The First Lord of
the Admiralty explained that merchant vessels carrying
guns might belong to one or other of two different
classes.
" The first class," he added, " is that of armed merchant
cruisers, which on the outbreak of war would be commis-
sioned under the White Ensign, and would then be in-
distinguishable in status and control from men-of-war.
In this class belong the Mauretania and the Lusitania.
The second class consist of merchant vessels which would
(unless specially taken up by the Admiralty for any
purpose) remain merchant vessels in war, without any
change of status, but have been equipped by their owners,
with Admiralty assistance, with a defensive armament
in order to exercise their right of beating off an attack.
1 Hansard, House of Commons, March 26th, 1913.
2 Afterwards raised to the Peerage as Lord Beresford.
124 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
There is no rule that the master or chief officer must belong
to the Royal Naval Reserve, and it will be clear, from
what I have said, that no such rule is necessary. The
Blue Ensign would only be flown if the vessel had received
an Admiralty warrant. Before lending the guns, the
Admiralty satisfies itself that the handling and firing of
them will be carried out by men who have become con-
versant with these operations through drill." l
The Admiralty continued to pursue with renewed energy
and in face of a good deal of adverse criticism the policy
which it had adopted, and at the opening of the war thirty-
nine vessels belonging to the following companies had been
defensively armed, each having been provided with two
4'7 inch guns :
Ships fitted.
1. White Star Line . . . .11
2. Royal Mail Steam Packet Co. . . 10
3. Federal Houlders Argentine Line . 5
4. G. Thompson & Co. Ltd. . . 3
5. Wilson Line, Hull . . . .3
6. New Zealand Shipping Co., Ltd. . 2
7. Federal Steam S. Co., Ltd. . . 2
8. Shaw, Savill & Albion, Ltd. . . 2
9. Turnbull Martin & Co. . . . 1
39
In those circumstances the situation was full of unwel-
come possibilities when at length war was declared. Ger-
many possessed a large number of vessels which were
capable of conversion. There were about twenty such ships
in German ports, including the following : Bremen (15
knots) ; Cap Finisterre (17) ; Cap Poloni (18) (completing
for sea); Cleveland (16); Colva (14'5) ; Graf Waldersee
(13) ; Imperator (25) ; Kaiserin Auguste Victoria (17'5) ;
Kigoma (15*5) ; Konig Friedrich August (15'5) ; Konigin
Luise (15) ; Helsor (12'5) ; Pratonia (13) ; Prinz Ludwig
(15*5) ; Scharnhorst (14'5) ; and Victoria Luise (18).
The menace which these ships suggested was limited by
the knowledge that the Grand Fleet had taken up its
1 Hansard, House of Commons, June 10th, 1913.
CH. n] GERMANY'S CONVERTIBLE SHIPS 125
station in the northern part of the North Sea, with
cruiser squadrons at the focal points of the trade routes,
and that the Straits of Dover were held by more or
less adequate forces. Escape by the narrow route to the
southward was unlikely in view of all the circumstances,
but there was less certainty to the northward, for the dis-
tance from the North of Scotland to Iceland being 450 miles,
and from Iceland to Greenland 160 miles, a line of over
600 miles required to be watched by the Northern Patrol.
This Northern Patrol consisted eventually of twenty-four
armed liners, known as the 10th Cruiser Squadron, or
blockading squadron, under the command of Rear- Admiral
Sir Dudley de Chair. The possibility of several of the
swiftest of the German merchant vessels, their character
disguised, breaking out in thick weather, and taking the
fullest advantage of the period of darkness, was one that
it was impossible to ignore. In the outer seas the danger
was far greater, as there were distributed in neutral ports
a large number of ships which could be converted
into armed vessels for use on the trade routes. They
included :
In North American Ports and North Atlantic :
Friedrich der Grosse (14*5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
Barbarossa (14 knots), at New York on August 4th.
Grosser Kurfurst (15' 5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
Kronprinzessin (23*5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
Vaterland (26'75 knots), at New York on August 4th.
President Grant (14*5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
George Washington (19 knots), arrived New York,
August 5th.
Kaiser Wilhelm II (23'5 knots), arrived New York,
August 6th.
President Lincoln (14'5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
Pennsylvania (13'5 knots), at New York on
August 4th.
Amerika (17'5 knots), at Boston on August 4th.
Cincinnati (16 knots), arrived Boston, August 8th.
126 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. 11
Prinz Oskar (12 '5 knots), arrived Philadelphia,
August 5th.
Kronprinz Wilhelm (23 knots), sailed from New York,
August 3rd, to meet the KARLSRUHE, by whom she
was armed.
Spreewald (12*5 knots), at sea; captured by the
BERWICK, September 12th.
Neckar (14 knots), at sea; arrived Baltimore, Sep-
tember 2nd.
Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse (22'5 knots), on her way
out from Germany into the Atlantic (movements
unknown at the time).
Bethania (12 knots), on her way from Mediterranean
to join the KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE, captured
by the ESSEX, September 7th.
In Spanish and Portuguese Ports :
Westerwald (12*5 knots), at Lisbon on August 4th.
Goeben (14*5 knots), at Vigo on August 4th.
Bulow (14'5 knots), at Lisbon on August 4th.
In Mediterranean :
Konig Albert (15 knots), at Genoa on August 4th.
Moltke (16*5 knots), at Genoa on August 4th.
In Sea of Marmora :
Corcovado (13' 5 knots), at Panderma.
East of Suez :
Sudmark (12 '5 knots), at sea between Colombo and
Aden ; captured by the BLACK PRINCE, August 15th,
in Red Sea.
Zeiten (14*5 knots), at sea between Colombo and
Aden, joined the KONIGSBERG. Arrived Mozam-
bique, August 20th.
Kleist (14-5 knots), sailed for Colombo, August 2nd ;
arrived Padang, August 7th.
Tabora (14'5 knots), at Dar-es-Salaam. Blocked in
port, August 8th.
Yorck (14-5 knots), at Tsingtau. Sailed, August 4th,
with supplies for Admiral Von Spee.
Prinz Eitel Friedrich (15 knots), at Tsingtau, sailed
(armed), August 6th.
CH. n] GERMANY'S CONVERTIBLE SHIPS 127
Princess Alice (15' 5 knots), arrived Manila, August 5th ;
moved about for some time around Philippines.
Seydlitz (14*5 knots), sailed for Sydney, August 8rd;
arrived Valparaiso, August 20th.
In Suez Canal :
Derfflinger (14'5 knots), interned by Egyptian Govern-
ment.
In South American Ports or Waters :
Cap Trafalgar (18 knots), at Buenos Ayres. Put to
sea and armed from the EBER. Sunk by the
CARMANIA, September 14th.
Blucher (16*5 knots), at Pernambuco on August 4th.
West Coast of Africa :
Max Brock (11 knots), at Duala. Captured by the
CUMBERLAND in September.
Itolo (9 knots), sunk by French in Corisco Bay.
In British and Belgian Ports :
Gneisenau (14*5 knots), at Antwerp on August 4th.
Seized by Belgians.
Prinz Adalbert (12*5 knots), seized at Falmouth,
August 4th.
Some other ships, such as the Prinz Heinrich at Lisbon,
were also suspected by the Admiralty of having been
prepared for conversion.
In addition to these German merchantmen, the future
use of which was open to suspicion, there were a number
of Austrian ships. Moreover, Germany and Austria-
Hungary had. in foreign waters, many other ships which
were capable of employment for intelligence purposes, or
might be used as store-ships or colliers.
Beyond all these elements of danger, which the Admiralty
could not, and in fact did not, ignore, there was a powerful
squadron of German men-of-war in the Pacific, and cruisers
were known to be serving in other parts of the world.1
1 Austria- Hungary had in foreign waters only one man-of-war of im-
portance, the light cruiser KAISERIN ELIZABETH, 3,936 tons displacement ;
armed with eight 5 -9-inch ; fourteen 3-pounders ; 1 machine-gun. Her sea
speed was 17-2 knots. She was at Tsingtau.
10
128
ON THE EVE OF WAR
[CH. II
The following list conveys some idea of the added menace
arising from these vessels1 :
Displace-
ment.
Sea
Speed.
Armament.
Mediterranean :
Tons.
Knots.
GOEBEN (1911) b.c.
24,640
22-8
10-11 in. ; 12-5-9 in ; 12-22 pr.
BRESLAU (1911) I.e.
4,480
24-5
12-4-1 in. 1-7 pr. 2-m.
Far East:
SCHARNHORST (1906) a.c.
11,420
20-5
8-8-2 in. 6-5-9 in ; 18-22 pr.
GNEISENAU (1906) a.c. .
11,420
20-5
8-8-2 in. 6-5-9 in ; 18-22 pr.
EMDEN (1908) I.e.
3,592
21-8
10-4-1 in. 1-7 pr. 2-m.
lLTis(1898)g.b. .
885
14-0
4-15 pr. 6-1 pr. 2-m.
JAGUAR (1 898 )g.b.
885
14-0
4-15 pr. 6-1 pr. 2-m.
TIGER (1 899) g.b.
885
14-0
2-4-1 in. 6-1 pr. 2-m.
LucHS(1899) g.b.
885
14-0
2-4-1 in. 6-1 pr. 2m.
CORMORAN(1892) g.b. .
1,602
16-0
8-4-1 in. 5-1 pr. 2-m.
TsiNGTAU(1903)r.g.b. .
220
13-0
1-4 pr. ; 2-m. ; 1-1 5 pr.
VATERLAND (1903) r.g.b.
220
13-0
1-4 pr. ; 2-m. ; 1-1 5 pr.
OTTER (1 909) r.g.b.
265
15-0
2-4 pr. ; 3-m.
TAKU( 1898) t.b.d.
276
30-0
2-4 pr.
" S.90 " (1899) t.b.d. .
394
26-0
3-4 pr. ; 2-m.
East Pacific :
NURNBERG (1906) I.e. .
3,400
21-6
10-4-1 in. ; 1-7 pr. ; 2-m.
LEIPZIG (1905) I.e.
3,200
20-0
10-4-1 in.; 1-7 pr. ; 2-m.
Australian Waters :
GEIER( 1894) g.b.
1,590
16-0
8-4-1 in. ; 5-1 pr. ; 2-m.
PLANET (1905) s.v.
650
9-5
3-1 pr. ; 2-m.
West Coast of Africa :
EBER( 1903) g.b. .
984
14-0
2-4-1 in. ; 6-1 pr. ; 2-m.
East Coast of Africa :
KONIGSBERG (1905) 1.0.
3,350
21-3
10-4-1 in. ; 1-7 pr. ; 2-m.
West Atlantic :
KARLSRUHE (1912) I.e.
5,500
27-25
12-41 in. ; 2-m.
DRESDEN (1907) I.e. .
4,520
24'0
10-41 ; in 2-m.
The sheet anchor of British merchant seamen, con-4
fronted by the unknown possibilities of war, was the
increased regard which all the polite nations of the world
had paid to international law for many years, and the
anxiety which had been expressed by them to make their
acts conform to the unwritten code — the dictates of
humanity.
1 b.c — battle cruiser ; a.c. — armoured cruiser ; I.e. — light cruiser ;
g.b — gunboat; r.g.b. — river gunboat; t.b.d. — torpedo-boat destroyer;
a.v. — surveying vessel.
CH. n] INSTRUCTIONS TO GERMAN SHIPS 129
The evidence as to the German policy of arming merchant
ships on a large scale on the outbreak of war was not
confirmed by subsequent experience. Diplomatic docu-
ments since published suggest that Germany did not
expect that the United Kingdom would intervene, and
she was convinced that in any event the British Navy
would not be mobilised rapidly, and that she would have
ample time to carry out the scheme of conversion. The
British Admiralty was ready for eventualities, with the
result that the German Fleet was at once thrown back on
the defensive, not only in the North Sea, but in every sea
in which German men-of-war were stationed, and neither
time nor opportunity permitted full advantage being taken
of the large scheme for attacking British commerce. In
February 1914, the Nautical Division of the Norddeutscher
Lloyd issued instructions of a general character to all
merchant vessels equipped with wireless installation. They
were told that if war broke out they would be informed
by wireless. This action suggested that preliminary
arrangements were then being made by the German naval
authorities for securing the safety of the general body of
German merchant shipping and releasing other vessels for
offensive operations. But towards the end of July of the
same year, the only official instructions, so far as is known,
which were issued, were to the effect that masters should
make for the nearest neutral port. These orders were to
the following effect :
" Although there are at present no reasons whatever
to fear war complications with any other Power, still it
appears desirable to us to issue the following instructions,
which are to be strictly observed :
" (Unless Requisitioned)
' We hereby prescribe that, in case of war or compli-
cations threatening war, you, with the ship entrusted to
you, when lying in a neutral port, will remain there or
will immediately endeavour to reach the nearest neutral
port or neutral territory. You will then await there the
further course of things, and we shall then transmit to you
further instructions direct or through our representatives."
Before declarations of war began to issue from the
130 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
capitals of Europe, German merchantmen were already
running in all haste to safety. On the other hand, the
German authorities, ignoring the precedent they set in
1870,1 revealed by their acts that they intended to put
every obstacle in the way of British merchant ships leaving
German ports. In some cases the instructions may have
been exceeded owing to the zeal of the local authorities,
but it was subsequently established that the Imperial
Government had intervened to stop sailings. On August
1st, Sir Edward Grey sent a dispatch to the British Am-
bassador at Berlin, in which he reported that information
had reached the Foreign Office that the " authorities at
Hamburg had forcibly detained a steamer belonging to the
Great Central Railway Company and other British mer-
chant ships." Surprise was expressed at this action, and Sir
E. Goschen was asked to request the German Government
to send immediate orders that vessels should be allowed
to proceed without delay, it being added that " the effect
on public opinion here would be deplorable unless this is
done." An immediate reply was received from Berlin
stating that " the Secretary of State, who expressed
greatest surprise and annoyance, has promised to send
orders at once to allow steamers to proceed without delay."
In a subsequent telegram, Sir E. Goschen added that the
" Secretary of State informs me that orders were sent last
night to allow British ships in Hamburg to proceed on
their way. He says that this must be regarded as a special
favour of His Majesty's Government, as no other foreign
ships have been allowed to leave. Reason of detention
was that mines were being laid and other precautions
being taken " — a mere cloak for illegality. On the same
day (August 2nd) the Foreign Office sent to Berlin another
telegram to the following effect : "I regret to learn that
100 tons of sugar were compulsorily unloaded from the
British steamship Sappho at Hamburg, and detained.
Similar action appears to have been taken with regard to
other British vessels loaded with sugar. You should
inform Secretary of State that, for reasons stated in my
telegram of August 1st, I most earnestly trust that the
orders already sent to Hamburg to allow the clearance of
British ships covers also the release of their cargoes, the
1 Days of grace, running to a period of six weeks, were extended to enemy
merchant ships to enable them to leave German ports.
CH. n] GERMANY'S ILLEGAL ACTS 131
detention of which cannot be justified." Sir E. Goschen
replied on the following day that " no information was
available." On August 4th, Sir E. Grey sent another
message to the British Ambassador at Berlin stating :
" I continue to receive numerous complaints from British
firms as to the detention of their ships at Hamburg, Cux-
haven, and other German ports. This action on the part
of the German authorities is totally unjustifiable. It is
in direct contravention of international law and of the
assurances given to Your Excellency by the Imperial
Chancellor. You should demand the release of all British
ships, if such release has not yet been given." l On the
same day the German Ambassador in London issued the
following explanation, which, it will be seen, avoided the
fact that a general policy of detention had been adopted :
" The Wilson liner Castro was in Kiel Canal, and was
ordered by the German authorities to proceed to Hamburg
for military reasons, as it was not desirable that any com-
mercial vessel should be in the canal at present. As
regards the second case, the Government had purchased
coal shipped for Germany to a private firm, and the order
was given for the ship to proceed to Hamburg with her
cargo. It was solely a matter of changing its destination.
In both cases there was no intention whatever of inter-
fering with the property of the vessels. It was simply
a police measure." It was subsequently ascertained that
in many of the German ports every possible obstacle had
been put in the way of the British shipmasters to prevent
them taking their ships to sea, before war had begun ;
in some cases guards were mounted while the two countries
still maintained friendly relations, and threats were made
to deter masters from communicating with their owners.
Many of the merchantmen prisoners who for many weary
months, some almost for the entire duration of the war,
languished in German camps belonged to vessels which had
thus been detained contrary to the recognised practice. The
enemy treated these seamen with great harshness, as was
revealed when their miserable experiences were subsequently
recounted. Some of them were maimed for life, owing to
injury inflicted upon them by their guards, and others
never recovered from the effects of bad food, damp and
exposure. The Germans detained no fewer than eighty
* Cd. 7860.
132 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
British ships.1 Unfortunately, the action cannot be at-
tributed to over-zeal of the officials of one port, for the
detentions were enforced in practically all German ports.
This early indication of the contempt of the German
Government for international law may be contrasted with
the attitude of the officers of the German men-of-war
during the first phase of the conflict. So far as is known,
they received no special instructions as to the treatment
of enemy merchantmen, but were left to act in accor-
dance with the Naval Prize Code, based generally on the
provisions of the Declaration of London. Under the first
article it was laid down that * : " During a war the com-
manders of His Majesty's ships of war have the right to stop
and search enemy and neutral merchant vessels, and to seize
— and, in exceptional cases, to destroy — the same, together
with the enemy and neutral goods found thereon." The
limits to the right of capture were dealt with at length,
and in describing the object of stoppage and search it
was declared that — " The stoppage and search shall take
place only if the commander deems that it will be success-
ful." It was added : "^All acts shall be done in such a
manner — even against the enemy — as to be compatible
with the honour of the German Empire, and with such
regard towards neutrals as may be in conformity with the
law of nations and the interests of Germany." The ships
specifically mentioned as being free from capture included
hospital ships and vessels engaged exclusively in coastwise
fishery or in the small local shipping trade, so long as they
did not in any manner participate in the hostilities.
" Coastwise fishery is not confined to the territorial waters
of a particular State. It is deemed to include all fishing,
with the exception of what is clearly deep-sea fishing."
Enemy merchant vessels which at the beginning of hostili-
ties were on a voyage from a German port or the port of
an Ally to their port of destination, or to such other port
as might have been designated to them, and were in
1 On August 4th, 1914, a proposal from Germany, made simultaneously
to Great Britain, France, Russia, and Belgium, that days of grace should
be recognised reciprocally, was received by the British Government. A
counter-proposal, incorporated in the London Gazette of August 4th, was
communicated to Germany, the offer expiring on the 7th. The suggestion
was not received in Berlin until the 8th, and nothing came of the matter.
2 The Prize Code of September 30th, 1909 ; Bulletin of Laws of August
3rd, 1914, amended to July 1st, 1915. (German Prize Law, Huberich and
King. London: Stevens & Co.)
CH. ii] GERMAN PRIZE CODE 133
possession of a pass — provided, however, that they had
not deviated from the course prescribed to them, unless
they could explain such deviation in a satisfactory manner
—were also exempt from capture.
The Prize Code set out the procedure to be followed in
case of stoppage and capture, in accordance with inter-
national precedent, and several paragraphs were devoted
to the treatment of crews and passengers of captured
vessels. It was laid down that, if a vessel were captured
while making armed resistance or participating in belli-
gerent operations, " persons on board thereof not embodied
in the armed forces, who have participated in the belli-
gerent operations or offered armed resistance, are dealt
with according to the usages of war. Other persons
belonging to the crew are made prisoners of war." In
the case of capture of an enemy vessel or a neutral vessel
rendering unneutral service, "the master, officers, and
crew, if subjects of an enemy State, are not to be made
prisoners of war, providing they enter into a formal written
engagement not to undertake any services connected
with the belligerent operations of the enemy during the
pendency of the war. Members of the crew who are sub-
jects of a neutral State must be released without the im-
position of any conditions. If the master and officers
are subjects of a neutral State, they are to be released,
provided they give a formal written promise not to accept
service on board any enemy vessel during the pendency
of the war." It was furthermore declared that " passen-
gers on board captured vessels are not to be deprived of
their liberty, and are to be released as soon as possible,
unless required as witnesses." It was added that the
treatment of prisoners of war should, so far as the cir-
cumstances of the naval warfare permit, be in conformity
with Articles 4 to 20 of the Appendix to Convention
IV of the Second Hague Conference. It was also provided
that " the master and crew of a captured vessel, unless
they are prisoners of war, shall continue to perform their
former duties until they are released. So far as possible
the use of force is to be avoided. In so far as the cir-
cumstances of the war permit, they remain in the enjoy-
ment of their rights." It was further laid down that " the
rights of the passengers on board captured vessels shall
be restricted only in urgent cases — e.g., on account of
134 ON THE EVE OF WAR LCH. n
unneutral acts." Persons on board a captured vessel
might be placed on board another vessel, even the war-
vessel, if the circumstances required such a course, re-
maining on board the war- vessel " only so long as this is
absolutely necessary."
Other clauses of the Prize Code covered the method
of dealing with captured vessels and seized cargoes. The
commander, it was declared, " provides for bringing the
vessel into a German port or the port of an Ally with all
possible despatch and safety. A prize may be brought
into a neutral port only if the neutral Power permits the
bringing in of prizes. A prize may be taken into a neutral
port on account of unseaworthiness, stress of weather,
or lack of fuel or supplies. In the latter cases she must
leave as soon as the cause justifying her entrance ceases
to exist." The commander was instructed to give to the
officer of the prize crew the necessary written instructions
in regard to the voyage, and to make up the crew so as to
enable the officer to bring in the vessel. It was added that,
" before proceeding to the destruction of a vessel, the
safety of all persons on board, and, so far as possible,
their effects, is to be provided for, and all ship's papers
and other evidentiary material, which, according to the
views of the persons at interest, is of value for the for-
mulation of the judgment of the Prize Court, are to be
taken over by the commander." A section of the Prize
Code was also devoted to the rights and duties of officers
of a prize crew, it being added that " unnecessary measures
of force are to be avoided."1
On June 22nd, 1914, the Chief of the Admiralty Staff
of the German Navy addressed an order to the commanding
officers and commanders in respect of their conduct when
encountering armed merchant vessels during war. It was
therein stated that :
" The exercise of' the right of stoppage, search, and
capture, as well as any attack made, by an armed merchant
vessel against a German or neutral merchant vessel, is
piracy. The crew are to be dealt with under the ordinance
relating to extraordinary martial law.
"If an armed enemy merchant vessel offers armed
1 Prize Code of the German Empire as in force July 1915 (London :
Stevens & Co.).
CH. n] A SIGNIFICANT NAVAL ORDER 135
resistance against measures taken under the law of prize,
such resistance is to be overcome with all means available.
The enemy Government bears all responsibility for any
damages to the vessel, cargo, and passengers. The crew
are to be taken as prisoners of war. The passengers are
to be left to go free, unless it appears that they partici-
pated in the resistance. In the latter case they may be
proceeded against under extraordinary martial law."
It will thus be seen that on the eve of hostilities the
enemy declared that the crews of merchant vessels were
to be treated as prisoners of war if they resisted capture,
and that the passengers, in case of resistance, might be
proceeded against " under extraordinary martial law."
That exposure of policy is the primary factor in the under-
standing of the German attitude, and an essential element
in the due appreciation of the danger to which merchant
seamen were exposed. Such was the position at sea when
the war opened, which was to convert Europe into a vast
battle-field and strew the seas with the bodies of defenceless
men, weak women, and innocent children.
On a date preceding the British declaration of war,
August 3rd, evidence was supplied that Germany had
already completed measures for the defence of her ports.
On August 3rd, the steamship San Wilfrido (6,458 tons)
was in the River Elbe, about eight miles above Bruns-
buttel, when orders were received that she might proceed
on her voyage, calling at Cuxhaven. No pilot was avail-
able to take her through the minefield which had already
been laid at Cuxhaven, so the San Wilfrido followed the
usual channel. The men in charge of the harbour tugs,
who were watching her progress, realised that the ship
was in danger, and shouted to the master, who immediately
attempted to go full speed astern. Before way was off
the ship, she was caught by the strong ebb tide and
drifted into the mine zone. Three explosions occurred,
and then the steamship began to settle down by the stern,
taking a heavy list to port. A German tug went along-
side to take off the crew, and shortly afterwards the San
Wilfrido was firmly aground. Two days later a somewhat
similar incident occurred to the steamship Craigforth
(2,900 tons), which had shipped a cargo of wheat at Ghe-
nichesk consigned to Hamburg. She was proceeding
136 ON THE EVE OF WAR [CH. n
on her voyage in the Bosphorus when she struck a mine.
A patrol steamer came to her assistance, and the vessel
was beached. While temporary repairs were being carried
out the Turkish authorities seized the cargo. Within a
week the Craigforth was refloated, and was about to resume
her voyage to Hamburg when the master and crew were
ordered by the British Consul to leave her. These two
minor incidents, however, conveyed no suggestion of the
experiences which were to befall British merchant seamen
during the first phase of the enemy's operations against
sea-borne commerce. Both ships had suffered injury in
territorial waters. But, in the meantime, an event had
occurred in the North Sea which indicated that the
Germans intended to take the fullest advantage of a mining
policy, the Konigin Luise being caught off Aldeburgh, on
the morning of August 5th, laying mines in the track of
merchantmen. In spite of these developments, shipping
in British waters was conducted for several weeks without
mishap, except for the damage from a mine sustained by
the Oakby off Seaham on August 30th ; that vessel,
however, succeeded in reaching the Tyne.
CHAPTER III
CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING
WITHIN less than two days of the outbreak of war an
incident occurred off the Gulf of Aden which showed that
enemy cruisers which were at large in the outer seas in-
tended to make the best of what was to prove a compara-
tively short period of freedom from interference. For
as soon as war was declared, the Admiralty put into opera-
tion the plans for the protection of merchant shipping
which had been prepared in advance.
On July 23rd, the s.s. City of Winchester (6,601 tons),
of the Hall Line, had left Calcutta with a general cargo
for London and Dunkirk. The voyage was marked by no
notable incident until the evening of August 5th, when
the master (Mr. George R. Boyck) received news of the
outbreak of war in a dramatic manner. At 8.30 p.m.,
when the vessel was steaming at full speed in the Gulf
of Aden, a strange cruiser, afterwards recognised as the
KONIGSBERG, drew towards her, making no signal and firing
no gun. The significance of the movement was not missed
by the captain of the British vessel. The warship's guns
could be seen in the moonlight trained upon the defenceless
merchant ship, and, when the signal was received to
stop, Captain Boyck had no alternative but to comply.
A boat was immediately sent off from the KONIGSBERG
with an armed crew, and after the ship's papers had been
seized, and the ship's wireless installation destroyed,
orders were given for her to proceed in accordance with
direct ions received from theK6NiGSBERG,an officer and four
men remaining on board to insure obedience. During
the whole of that night and until the afternoon of the
next day, the captain, the first British merchant officer
on the high seas to experience the annoyances and delays
of war, was directed to steam various courses, bu£ always
to the westward, until anchor was at last dropped in the bay
137
138 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
of the small port of Makalla, about 200 miles from Aden
on the Arabian coast. At this point the KONIGSBERG was
joined by the Norddeutscher Lloyd steamship Zieten,
and the Ostmark, of the Hamburg Amerika Line, acting
as supply ships. A steam- pinnace, with an officer and a
party of men, was then sent to the City of Winchester,
and they took away all the charts and sailing directions.
Another prize crew, consisting of two lieutenants and
fifteen men, all well armed, was placed on board, and
that evening the four ships put to sea with all lights
out, the Zieten leading. After leaving the bay, the
KONIGSBERG and Ostmark disappeared, and for the time
nothing more was seen of them. For the next two days
the City of Winchester continued to follow the Zieten,
always making to the north-east, until anchor was cast
in the north-east bay of Hallaniya, the largest island
of the Khorya Morya group. On the following morning
the Zieten went alongside the City of Winchester and com-
menced to take about 300 tons of her bunker coal, as well
as her stores of food and drink. In the meantime the cap-
tain and the European crew, with the exception of the
second officer, the third engineer, and the carpenter, were
transferred to the German ship, and early on the following
morning, the coaling being completed, the Zieten dis-
appeared in the darkness. During the day the prize
crew completed the task of seizing all the foodstuffs to
be found in the cargo. The same afternoon the KONIGS-
BERG reappeared, and, making fast on the port side of the
City of Winchester, took the remainder of the coal (about
250 tons), all the fresh water, and what was left of foodstuffs.
Throughout the night, work continued with carefully
screened lights. At 4.30 on the following morning,
August 12th, the remaining officers and the lascar crew
were ordered on board the cruiser with their personal
belongings. While the third engineer, under compulsion,
was pointing out to the German officer the steps which
could be taken to flood the ship, the task of dismantling
all that was portable of her equipment was completed by
the enemy. In a short space measures were taken
to insure the sinking of the vessel, and then the KONIGS-
BERG, having embarked the boarding- party, stood off,
fired three shells into the abandoned vessel, and steamed
away. Two hours later, the KONIGSBERG reached a bay
CH.III] END OF THE "CITY OF WINCHESTER" 13d
of Soda Island, where she met the German merchant
ship Goldenfels, which was encountered at a convenient
moment when homeward bound from Hankow ; to her the
second officer, the third engineer, the carpenter, and
the lascars, were transferred. For some unexplained
reason the Goldenfels then returned to the spot where
the City of Winchester had been left in a sinking con-
dition. It was the unhappy experience of the former
officers and men of this ship to spend the remainder
of the day watching her founder until only the black
top of the funnel, the wireless mast, and part of the
top of the mast remained in view. The elaborate
and lengthy ritual had at last been completed after an
interval of a week. " We were afterwards conveyed in
the Goldenfels to Sabang, where," the second officer re-
corded in his report to the owners, " I safely arrived
with all my men, and I have obtained a paper from the
master of the Goldenfels certifying that he saw the ship
sink ; it is witnessed by the commander of a Dutch gun-
boat." The Zieten reached Mozambique with her funnels
disguised so as to represent a vessel of the British India
Steam Navigation Company, and sfye hoisted the British
red ensign on entering the port. In the meantime, the
master and his companions had already been landed at
Mozambique, leaving on record that he and his companions
" were treated with every civility and respect by the
Germans." l
While these adventures were befalling the officers and
men of the City of Winchester, the German cruiser DRESDEN
had begun her short career as a commerce destroyer,
making her presence felt on the trade route from South
America to the United States. Two days after the opening
of the war, she fell in with three British vessels, the
Drumcliffe (4,072 tons), the Lynton Grange (4,252 tons),
and the Hostilius (3,325 tons). The first of these vessels
had left Buenos Ayres in ballast on July 24th with in-
structions to call at Trinidad to replenish her bunkers
for her voyage to New York. Captain Evans was un-
aware of the outbreak of war, and was proceeding on his
1 The City of Winchester was the only capture of the KONIGSBERO. At
the end of October 1914, this German cruiser was found to have taken
refuge in the Rufigi River (German East Africa). There she was blockaded,
and in the following July she was destroyed by British men-of-war.
140 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
course, unconcerned, when he was stopped by a strange
man-of-war off the mouth of the Amazon. The warship
proved to be the German light cruiser DRESDEN on her way
round the Horn to the Pacific, possibly intending to join
Admiral von Spee, commanding the German Pacific
Squadron. The meeting was as unwelcome to her captain
as it was to the master of the Drumcliffe, who had on
board his wife and child. The British seaman had, of
course, received no instructions from the Admiralty,
while Captain Liidecke found himself in a situation
which had not been anticipated in his orders. A party
was sent to the Drumcliffe, and it was at once reported
that a woman and child were on board. Three courses
were open to the German officer conversant with the
humane sentiments expressed at The Hague Conference,
and embodied in the German Naval Prize Code. He could
either send the Drumcliffe with a prize crew into port,
but none of a suitable character existed in the vicinity ;
he could order the ship to follow his movements ; or he
could release her on parole. He chose the last course.
The vessel's wireless installation was dismantled, and the
officers and crew were called upon to sign a declaration
not to take service against Germany during the war.
Captain Evans feared that a refusal to comply with this
demand might jeopardise the safety of his wife and child,
and he and his men gave the necessary undertaking.
Within two hours or so the Drumcliffe was again under way.
The troubles of the captain of the DRESDEN were not
yet at an end. The Drumcliffe having been released at
3.40 on the afternoon of August 6th, it was his misfortune
at 4.45 to fall in with the Houlder liner Lynton Grange,
on passage from Rosario to Barbadoes. By signal
from the DRESDEN, the master of the Lynton Grange
(Mr. H. L. Simpson) learnt that a state of war existed
between his country and Germany. While the signals
were passing between the two ships, the Houston liner
Hostilius, on her voyage from Montevideo to Cienfuegos,
Cuba, via Barbadoes, came in view. She also had put to
sea before the outbreak of war, and was proceeding in
company with the Lynton Grange. The captain of the
DRESDEN sent boarding-parties to both ships. In the
case of the Lynton Grange the ship's papers were examined
on board the cruiser, and then a naval officer returned
CH.III] "HOSTILIUS" RELEASED WITHOUT PAROLE 141
and required that the British officers and men should
sign a declaration to the following effect :
" We, the captain, officers, and crew of the s.s. Lynton
Grange, declare formally that we will not do any service
in the British Navy or Army, and will not give any assis-
tance to the British Government against Germany during
the present war."
A threat was made that, if the declaration was not
signed, the officers and men would be taken on board the
cruiser as prisoners of war, and the Lynton Grange sunk.
If, on the other hand, the pledge were given and subse-
quently contraband were carried during the war, the crew,
if caught, would be shot and their vessel destroyed. In
the circumstances, the master and the other officers
and the men decided to comply with the demand, and the
vessel was released. In the case of the Hostilius, the
boarding officer took the papers, which were in Spanish,
back to the cruiser to be translated. He returned with
them in about an hour, bringing with him the form of
parole. The master (Mr. James Jones) conferred with his
officers, and told them that he himself would not sign this
document. It was then agreed to refuse unanimously to
give the parole. The German boarding officer, on being
informed of that decision, himself called the crew together
and read the document to them. The men stated that they
would stand by Captain Jones. A signal was then made to
the DRESDEN, and, to the surprise of everyone on board,
the ship was ordered to be released. Before the boarding
officer left, however, he made the following entry in the
chief officer's log book :
" Hostilius.
" Held up by S.M.S. DRESDEN : Commander-Frigate
Captain Liidecke.
"Lat. 1° 21" N., long. 45° 1" W. Held up, August 6th,
1914, 5.20 p.m.; let go, August 6th, 1914, 7.40 p.m.
"Let go because her destruction did not seem worth
while.
"(Signed) FRIED RICH BURCHART,
" Lieut. Captain,"
The first ship to be sunk by the DRESDEN was the
142 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
s.s. Hyades (3, .352 tons), which left Pernambuco on August
14th, the master having put into that port for instructions
on his passage from Rosario to Rotterdam with a cargo
of maize and foodstuffs shipped by a German firm.
She was not fitted with wireless, but the master (Mr.
John Morrison) had fallen in with the cruiser GLASGOW
on August 8th, and, as a result of the warning given, put
into Pernambuco on the 10th. The Vice-Consul at Per-
nambuco had taken some pains to ascertain the extent
of the danger threatening British ships, having interro-
gated masters of three British vessels arriving from
British or American ports. The reply in each case was
identical : nothing had been seen of enemy cruisers.
In the meantime the agent of the Houston Company,
in reply to an inquiry, had received a telegram from the
owners stating that, unless the British authorities specially
detained the steamer, he was to instruct the master
to proceed to Las Palmas, adding, " German cruisers
allowing British steamers proceed unmolested, with ex-
ception removing wireless apparatus." The master was
therefore directed to avoid the regular route. The ship was
considerably to the eastward of the most easterly track to
Brazilian ports and River Plate from the Canary Islands,
when smoke was seen on the horizon off the port bow.
The smoke, it was found, came from the German cruiser
DRESDEN, which was accompanied by two tenders,
the Baden and Prussia. As the DRESDEN approached,
she was seen to be flying the French flag, a familiar decoy,
but this was replaced by the German ensign when about a
mile and a half distant. The Hyades continued on her
course until signalled to stop. A boarding- party took the
ship's papers, and Captain Morrison was told that it would
be impossible for him to reach Rotterdam, as he would
be diverted to a British port on entering the Channel.
The officers and men were given an hour to leave the ship
with their effects, and boats from the DRESDEN conveyed
them to the Prussia. The Hyades was afterwards sunk
by gunfire, explosives having been previously placed on
board and the covers taken off the condensers. The Prussia,
accompanied by the DRESDEN and Baden, then proceeded
south. As the Hyades carried a cargo destined for Ger-
many, the loss of the vessel, as the British Consul at Buenos
Ayres remarked, was " not an unmixed evil." The
CH. in] THE "KATHARINE PARK'S" RELEASE 143
gunnery of the DRESDEN, according to the master's state-
ment, was "noticeably bad"; the sea at the time the
Hyades was sunk was quite calm, the range was barely
a quarter of a mile, yet it took the DRESDEN some forty
minutes to sink her. The officers and crew of the Hyades
were landed at Rio de Janeiro, the master leaving it on
record that " he and his men were well and kindly treated
while on board the s.s. Prussia."
Before the Prussia parted company with the DRESDEN,
that cruiser met the s.s. Siamese Prince (4,847 tons), on
her way from London to the River Plate with a neutral
cargo. The vessel was stopped and boarded, but after
a delay of two hours was allowed to proceed, this leniency
being apparently due to the character of her cargo.
At this period in her career, the DRESDEN fell in with
only two other British ships, the Holm-wood (4,223 tons),
outward bound form Newport with coal for Bahia Blanca,
and the Katharine Park (4,854 tons), on passage from Santa
F6 and Buenos Ayres to New York. Both ships were off the
usual track in accordance with Admiralty instructions. The
story of the experiences of these two ships became known
when the Katharine Park (master, Mr. H. Paterson) put into
Rio de Janeiro on August 30th for the purpose of landing
the captain and crew of the Holmwood. It was then re-
ported that the Holmwood (master, Mr. R. H. Hill) had put
into Las Palmas and had met with no incident at sea
on leaving that port until the morning of August 26th,
when she encountered the DRESDEN. The German officer
of the boarding-party which went on board ordered the
captain and crew to collect their personal effects and to
proceed on board the Baden, a tender which was standing
by. After these instructions had been carried out and
some provisions had been transferred to the DRESDEN,
a mine which had been placed in the Holmwood was ex-
ploded and the vessel sunk. At the moment when this
ship was being despatched, the Katharine Park arrived on
the scene. The DRESDEN immediately sent a party on
board, the ship's papers were examined, half an hour
was given to the surprised master and crew to pack their
belongings, and preparations were made to sink the ship.
As an alternative, the captain was told he would be re-
leased if he and his men entered into the usual parole.
The latter course was adopted, and forthwith the master
11
144 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
and crew of the Holmwood were transferred to the Katharine
Park, which owed her release to the fact that she carried
an American cargo. The DRESDEN and her supply ship
then made off.
The captain of the DRESDEN was denied a further success
owing to the competency with which the Pacific Steam
Navigation Company's s.s. Ortega (8,075 tons) was handled.
She escaped capture and destruction in circumstances
which later on drew from the Admiralty, in a letter to the
owners, a glowing appreciation " of the courageous con-
duct of the master, Capain Douglas R. Kinneir, in throwing
off his pursuers by successfully navigating the uncharted
and dangerous passage of Nelson's Strait." Three hun-
dred Frenchmen were thus saved from becoming prisoners
of war, and eventually joined the Army of our Ally.
Nothing might have been known of this incident but for the
action of His Majesty's Consul-General at Rio de Janeiro,
who, learning the details, embodied them in a despatch to
the Foreign Office. In this statement he recalled that the
Ortega sailed from Valparaiso with some 300 French
Reservists on board towards the close of September.
These men were in considerable danger of falling into the
hands of any enemy cruiser which sighted the Ortega, as
the ship possessed a speed of only about 14 knots, whereas,
as has been noted already, the Germans had at sea a number
of ships of twenty or more knots. When the British
vessel was close to the western entrance of the Magellan
Straits, a German man-of-war, which was subsequently
identified as the DRESDEN, appeared and gave chase. The
Ortega, being the slower ship, ought speedily to have been
captured, but, in fact, she made her escape in the manner
narrated by the Consul-General at Rio de Janeiro :
" Under these circumstances the master of the Ortega
took a heroic resolve. He called for volunteers to assist
in stoking his vessel : that appeal met with hearty re-
sponse : firemen, engineers, and volunteers, stripped to
the waist, set to work with a will, and the master assured
me that they actually succeeded in whacking the old ship
(she was built in 1906) up to a good 18 knots : the master
headed his ship straight for the entrance of a passage
known as Nelson's Strait ; and he made for the Strait
at full speed, hotly pursued by the German cruiser, which
CH. m] CAPTAIN KINNEIR'S DARING FEAT 145
kept firing at him with two heavy bow guns. Luckily
none of the shot took effect, and the Ortega succeeded
in entering Nelson's Strait, where the German cruiser did
not dare to follow her.
44 In order to realise the hardihood of this action upon
the part of the master of the Ortega, it must be remembered
that Nelson's Strait is entirely uncharted, and that the
narrow, tortuous passage in question constitutes a veri-
table nightmare for navigators, bristling as it does with
reefs and pinnacle rock, swept by fierce currents and tide-
rips, and with the cliffs on either side sheer-to, without
any anchorage. I can speak from personal experience as
to the terrifying nature of the navigation of Nelson's
Strait, having once passed through it many years ago in
a small sealing schooner.
44 However, the master of the Ortega managed to get
his vessel safely through this dangerous passage, employing
the device of sending boats ahead, to sound every yard
of the passage. Eventually, by a miracle of luck and good
seamanship, he worked his way into Smyth's Channel,
without having sustained even a scratch to his plates,
and finally brought his vessel to this port."
It will be admitted that to take an 8, 000 -ton steamer
safely through so perilous a passage constituted a most
notable feat of pluck and skilful seamanship. Captain
Kinneir, confronted with the possibility of falling the
victim of an enemy cruiser, had exhibited once more
the resourcefulness, daring, and skill which British sea-
men have so frequently displayed, to the admiration of
the world. The publication of the story of his escape
raised the spirits of the nation at a moment when,
unaccustomed to the hazards of naval warfare, it was
inclined to wonder what further misfortune was to
happen, while at the same time it inspired the whole
Merchant Navy with a high pride in its mission.
Before her career ended, the DRESDEN encountered
two other British ships, the s.s. North Wales (3,661 tons ;
master, Mr. G. Owen) ; and the Conway Castle (1,694
tons; master, Mr. J. Williams). The former vessel was
on passage from Juan Fernandez Island, on charter by the
Admiralty, with 704 tons of coal for the Falkland Islands,
when she was captured by the DRESDEN on the morning of
146 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
November 16th, in lat. 37° 30' S., long. 77° 0' W. The
day had just dawned when the lookout of the North
Wales noticed what he took to be two war- vessels on the
starboard bow, distant about nine miles. The British
vessel immediately altered course, hoping to avoid being
seen by the two strange ships, which, in fact, kept on their
course until about 6.30 a.m., as though not noticing the
merchantman, when one of them, which proved to be the
DRESDEN, turned towards the North Wales. An hour
later she signalled to her to stop. The order was obeyed,
and the British ensign was hoisted under the impression
that the strange ship was a Japanese cruiser. As the
master had been observing the Admiralty's instructions,
steering a course which took him well clear of the trade
route, the encounter with the DRESDEN was an unfortunate
sequel to his well-directed efforts to avoid enemy ships.
As soon as the German boarding-party had examined
the ship's papers, the master was informed that the vessel
would be sunk, time being allowed for the officers and
men to collect their clothes ' and personal effects. Half
an hour later the North Wales was sunk, and on the follow-
ing day the crew were transferred to the German
s.s. Rhakotis, which was in company with the DRESDEN.
Several days later an officer from the DRESDEN demanded
that the master and men should sign a formal declaration
to take no part in the war, and they were subsequently
landed by the Rhakotis at Callao on December 14th. The
master of the North Wales, putting a strict interpretation
on the parole into which he had entered, refused to give any
information to the British Consul at the port as to what
had happened on board the Rhakotis during the inter-
vening weeks since the capture of his ship, beyond stating
that " during our whole time on board the s.s. Rhakotis
we were very well treated."
The last vessel to be captured by the DRESDEN was the
sailing-vessel Conway Castle, which had left Valparaiso on
February 17th, 1915, for Queenstown, with a cargo of barley.
All went well for ten days. In lat. 37°21/S., long. 81° 58'W.,
the DRESDEN appeared, and when still three miles
distant exchanged signals, ordering the ship to stop.
The boarding-party then proceeded on board, and after
the ship's stores and provisions had been transferred to
the DRESDEN, to which the crew had been ordered to row
CH. in] " KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE " 147
in their own boat, the Conway Castle was sunk. On
March 7th, master (Mr. John Williams) and men were
transferred to the Peruvian barque LORTON, and reached
Valparaiso five days later. This proved to be the last
exploit of the DRESDEN, which was sunk at Juan Fer-
nandez Island on March 14th by British cruisers. The
narrative of the experiences of British shipmasters shows
that the captain of the DRESDEN had a proper appreciation
of the mandates of humanity, and respected them in his
dealings with the unfortunate officers and men of British
merchant ships which he encountered during his cruise
as a corsair.
Nor does the story of the career of the armed merchant
cruiser KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE reveal any less
respect for the laws of the brotherhood of the sea which
had obtained general acceptance throughout the world
before the outbreak of war. Of the swift merchant ships
in German ports which were capable of offensive use on
the trade routes, this was the only one to put to sea in
the early days of the war. It is probable that she was
despatched in order to test the efficiency of the British
control of the seas. She must have moved up the Nor-
wegian coast at full speed, taking the fullest advantage
of the darkness, and proceeded on an extreme northerly
route, since at 7 o'clock on the evening of August 7th she
came upon the British steam trawler Tubal Cain (227 tons).
A heavy sea was running, and the skipper of the Tubal
Cain (Mr. Charles Smith) had just got his gear on board
and was preparing to light a buoy near which he intended to
" dodge," when the KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE ap-
peared. The scene of the incident was about fifty miles west-
north-west from Staalbierghuk, on the west coast of Iceland.
The German vessel put out a boat, and two officers boarded
the Tubal Cain. They asked the skipper if he had heard
that war had broken out between Germany and England.
The reply was in the affirmative, as he had heard it two
days ago, although the ketch had left Grimsby on July 25th.
A demand was made for the ship's papers, and the crew of
fourteen hands was directed to get into the trawler's small
boat and proceed on board the KAISER WILHELM DER
GROSSE. As there was a heavy sea running with a strong
wind, two journeys had to be made, but by 9 o'clock
the transfer had been completed, and then the KAISER
148 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
WILHELM DER GROSSE moved a short distance from the
Tubal Cain and began firing. Altogether forty-eight shots
were fired before the vessel was sunk. The firing officer
remarked to the skipper by way of apology for the bad
gunnery, that " the trawler, being British, took a lot of
sinking." The skipper and the chief engineer were
taken to the officers' quarters, an act of consideration
which was appreciated, but the rest of the crew were
sent below.
In those circumstances the KAISER WILHELM DER
GROSSE began her career, in the course of which she was
attended from time to time by at least four supply ships,
and sank only two British merchantmen. On August 15th
she fell in with the Union Castle liner Galician (6,762 tons),
which had left Table Bay on July 28th for London. The
Galician was in lat. 27° 30' N., long. 18° W., being about
sixty miles off the usual track from South Africa to
Tenerife, when the KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE over-
hauled her. According to the German officers, the pre-
sence of the liner had been revealed by a wireless message
which she had sent. The narrative of events can best
be given in the words of Captain E. M. Day, the master
of the Galician :
" On August 15th, at 2.45 p.m. in lat. 27° 30' N., long.
18° W., we were overhauled by the German armed cruiser
KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE, who signalled, ' If you
communicate by wireless I will sink you.' He then
ordered us to lower our aerial and to follow him at full
speed. At 3.15 p.m. we were ordered to stop. The cruiser
then sent a boat manned by two officers and men who
destroyed the wireless, inspected the ship's papers, and
mustered and inspected all passengers and crew. At
5.30 p.m. the Germans left the ship, taking with them
Lieutenant Deane, first-class passenger, and C. Sheerman
(gunner), third-class passenger, also all ship's papers and
documents, etc. At 5.40 p.m. we were ordered to precede
cruiser at full speed and to steer S. 25° W. (magnetic).
At 6 p.m. we received orders to keep all lights extinguished,
and to have all effects belonging to passengers and crew
ready on deck, to provision all boats, and to have every-
thing in order for leaving the ship at daylight. At 8.30
we were ordered to alter course to S. 17° E. (magnetic),
CH. m] RELEASING A PRIZE
on which course we continued until 3.40, August 16th,
when we received orders to steer S. 45° W. (magnetic),
the cruiser throughout following closely in our wake.
At 5 a.m. the cruiser sent the following message : ' To
Captain Day : I will not destroy your ship on account
of the women and children on board — you are dismissed
— good-bye.' To which the following reply was sent :
4 To German Captain — Most grateful thanks from passengers
and crew— good-bye.' Lat. 25° 25' N., long. 17° 20' W.
The cruiser then left us at full speed, and we turned ship
and shaped a course for Tenerife."
A further statement was made by Captain Day in the
following terms :
"Having made a verbal report this forenoon at the
Admiralty, I now beg to add the following observations
regarding the points with which I was then desired by
Captain Webb l to deal specially in my formal report :
" Courses. — The KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE did not
approach the Galician directly, but at first kept wide of
us on a parallel course, flying no colours, and it was only
when turning in towards us that she hoisted the German
ensign. I then ran up the Red Ensign, and it was at this
time the German cruiser threatened to sink me unless
I stopped wireless communication. The commander of
the cruiser then ordered me to follow him, and ultimately
to come alongside on his starboard side.
" As will be seen from my report above, after the German
officer had taken away my papers, we were ordered to
alter our courses from time to time, at a speed of 12 knots,
in such a way that we steered three triangular courses,
obviously as if the cruiser were looking out for some other
vessels, and it was possibly owing to failing in this attempt
that he at last dismissed my ship and allowed me to pro-
ceed on my voyage.
" Wireless Apparatus. — The manner in which I was
boarded has already been dealt with, but I may now say
that, after my aerials had been sent down, the wireless
installation was broken up by the Germans. I am pleased
to add that, as our aerials had not been thrown overboard,
the Senior Marconi Operator of my ship went ashore,
1 Director of the Trade Division of the War Staff, now Rear-Admiral
Sir Richard Webb, K.C.M.G., C.B,
150 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
upon our arrival at Tenerife, and obtained some spare
parts which enabled him to fit up an emergency apparatus
of moderate power. When this had been done, I instructed
him that, while he should take every opportunity of
receiving messages, he was on no account to transmit
any messages or to communicate with other ships until
we reached the English Channel. The fitting of this
temporary apparatus enabled me later on to communicate
with my owners. In my opinion great credit is due to the
operator for the steps he took to enable me thus to maintain
communication, and I have every reason to believe, not
only that he strictly carried out my orders in listening for
messages, as we afterwards received several, but that he
also avoided sending any messages without my authority.
" Tobacco. — Having heard that some of the German
boatmen were trying to purchase cigars and cigarettes
from our men on the lower deck, I passed along word that
there must be no trading with this German ship, and this
I believe was also done by the German officer who was
then in my cabin. After the mustering of the crew and
passengers, and the examination and removal of the ship' s
papers, I asked the German officer if he would take a cigar,
and he laughingly observed, ' Yes, we have no cigars left.'
This I felt to be a convenient opportunity for showing
my sense of the courtesy with which this individual officer
had treated myself and my ship, and I said to him, 4 If
you will have a few cigars or cigarettes, I shall be very
pleased.' I then sent a steward to fetch 300 cigars and
1,200 cigarettes, which I asked the officer to accept, and
he expressed his thanks for this act of courtesy.
" In this connection I may add that, after the German
cruiser had left us, I was told by several of my first-class
passengers that the men in the German boat did not appear
to relish their task, and that when asking for cigarettes
and tobacco they said, in what appeared almost a state
of trembling anxiety : ' We do not want to fight ; we have
no grudge against your English ships.'
" Medical Stores. — From casual conversation afterwards
with passengers, I learned that some of them had been
told by the men in the German boat alongside that the
KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE had a crew of about 450
men, very largely R.N.R. men, and it is significant of the
possibility of a considerable amount of sickness being on
CH. in] ANOTHER SHIP RELEASED 151
board that the German officer in charge of the boat's crew
took away all the quinine from the surgery of my ship." *
Early on the morning of August 16th, when the New
Zealand Shipping Company's s.s. Kaipara (7,392 tons)
was on passage to England from Montevideo with a large
cargo, the KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE, which had just
released the Galician, appeared, making signals which the
master (Mr. H. Makepeace) " could not understand."
He realised, however, that he was in danger. He was
sending wireless messages for assistance when the KAISER
WILHELM DER GROSSE steamed up and hailed him through
a megaphone : " Stop your wireless or I will sink you."
A boarding- party then went on board, threw several parts
of the wireless apparatus overboard, examined the ship's
papers, and, sending the officers and men on board
the merchant cruiser, sank the British vessel. A charge
of gun-cotton was put in the stokehole, the condenser
doors were opened, and then fifty-three shots were fired.
On the following day the Royal Mail Steam Packet Com-
pany's liner Arlanza (15,044 tons) was intercepted on her
voyage from Buenos Ayres to Southampton. She had left
the former port on July 31st, and was in lat. 24° 40' N., long.
17° 14' W. The procedure in the case of the Galician was
repeated. The Arlanza first received a signal, " Heave
to, or I will fire into you." When that order had been
complied with, the enemy vessel, which was then within
200 or 300 yards, sent another signal : " Lower away
and throw overboard all your wireless installation." A
later inquiry elicited the fact that the Arlanza was carrying
a number of passengers. That was followed by the wel-
come notification : " Dismissed on account of your having
women and children on board." That signal was twice
repeated. Then came the final message : " I have no
further commands for your captain." Commander C. E.
Down, in a report to his owners, stated that his passen-
gers were naturally rather excited during the exchange
1 In his report to the Union Castle Steamship Company, Captain Day
recorded that " the German officers were most courteous throughout."
The Admiralty sent through the Union Castle Mail Steamship Company
a special message of commendation to Captain Day and the wireless opera-
tor of the Galician : "To the former for the tact which he had displayed in
difficult circumstances, and to the latter for the promptitude and resource
with which he replaced the wireless installation."
152 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
of signals, wondering what their fate would be; "but
there was no panic or noise, and the relief was very marked
when they heard the verdict that we could proceed."
The Arlanza reached Las Palmas at 7 a.m. on the following
morning, having by 8 p.m. on the preceding night, or
six hours after the arrest, fitted up and put in working
order the ship's duplicate wireless set and sent warning
messages to the cruiser CORNWALL, which was known to
be cruising in the neighbourhood of the Canary Islands,
and that vessel passed them on to the CUMBERLAND.
The KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE next fell in with
the Elder liner Nyanga (3,066 tons). That vessel had
sailed from Calabar, on the West Coast of Africa, on
July 28th with a cargo of African produce for Hamburg ;
but on arrival at Sierra Leone, the master (Mr. C. H.
Jones) received orders to proceed to Liverpool, war
having broken out. The Nyanga was about 230 miles
south-west of Cape Blanco, being to the eastward of the
usual track, when the German cruiser was reported about
seven miles on her port bow, drawing in. A short time
afterwards the Nyanga was ordered to stop, and, after
the preliminary inquiries had been answered by signal,
a boarding-party instructed the officers and crew to collect
their belongings and proceed on board the KAISER
WILHELM DER GROSSE. »The sea-cocks were opened, the
condenser covers removed, and the Nyanga was then
sunk by means of a dynamite charge, which blew the
ship's side out.1
While the KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE was operating,
with small results, in the south-east Atlantic, the German
cruiser KARLSRUHE, the whereabouts of which had been for
some time the subject of anxiety to the Admiralty, was
busy in the neighbourhood of the West Indies, afterwards
reaching out to South American waters. Elaborate
arrangements had been made to insure adequate supplies
of coal and stores, tenders being placed under orders to
meet the warship as directed from time to time. The
cruise of the KARLSRUHE stands out from the history of
the warfare on commerce as a notable success achieved
by a weak sea power in face of superior force. After
1 The crews of the Kaipara and Nyanga were sent off in the German
tender Arucas before the action with the HIGHFLYER and landed at Las
Palmas on August 28th.
CH. in] THE •' KARLSRUHE'S " CAREER 153
escaping from Rear- Admiral Cradock's squadron in the
West Indies on August 6th, she revealed her presence to
the east of Barbadoes on August 18th. The steamship
Bowes Castle (4,650 tons), of the Lancashire Shipping
Company, had left Montevideo for New York on the very
day war was declared. Three days later the ship was
stopped by the British cruiser GLASGOW and warned
that, as war had broken out, she should proceed direct
to New York, avoiding the usual course and screening
lights. On noticing a warship of unknown nationality
at sea, about ten miles away on the port bow, the
master of the Bowes Castle (Mr. E. Howe) apparently
thought little of the incident, and proceeded on his
course. The strange ship, however, gradually drew in,
and at length fired a shot as a warning to the Bowes
Castle to stop. This signal was immediately complied
with, and it was then found that the stranger was
the KARLSRUHE. The usual routine with which other
masters had already become familiar was then followed.
The crew was sent on board the supply ship Patagonia,
and the Bowes Castle was sunk by explosive charges.
The Patagonia, with her involuntary passengers, subse-
quently followed the movements of the KARLSRUHE,
and on the 21st the two ships anchored off Maraca Island,
at the mouth of the River Amazon, and the cruiser pro-
ceeded to coal from the Patagonia. Six days later the
British seamen were transferred to another of the KARLS-
RUHE'S attendant ships, the collier Stadt Schleswig, and
were eventually landed at Maranham on September 2nd.
The German cruiser's bunkers having been filled, she
resumed her career of commerce destruction. On
the evening of August 31st, at 5 p.m., she fell in with the
steamship Strathroy (4,336 tons) 120 miles N.N.E. of Cape
St. Roque. This Glasgow-owned vessel was a valuable
prize, as she was carrying a large cargo of coal from Nor-
folk, Virginia, to Rio de Janeiro. She left the former
port on August 15th. The Strathroy was overhauled
by the warship and ordered to follow her to the lee side
of Rocas Island, where anchor was cast about three-
quarters of a mile from the shore. An armed guard then
proceeded on board the Strathroy and took possession of
her, in spite of the protests of the master (Mr. J. Mason),
who urged that the ship was in neutral waters. The
154 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
officer in command of the guard disregarded this plea.
Possibly in a spirit of bluff, he explained that the enemy
had learnt of the ship's departure from Norfolk, and
that her coal was badly needed, adding that he could
not let legal trifles stand in his way when the success
of the cruiser's operations was at stake. All the crew,
with the exception of some Chinamen, who were retained
to transfer a portion of the coal to the KARLSRUHE, were
ordered to leave the ship, which was taken away and sunk
some days later when she had served the enemy's purpose.
Her bunkers replenished,' the KARLSRUHE again put
to sea and overhauled the s.s. Maple Branch (4,338 tons),
on passage from Liverpool to Punta Arenas, Chile. Al-
though the Maple Branch carried a valuable cargo of 2,000
tons and prize cattle stated to be worth £4,0.00, the ship
was destroyed without compunction, the master and crew
being removed to the Crefeld, of Bremen, which was in
company with the KARLSRUHE. For service as scouts,
the captain of the KARLSRUHE kept in attendance on
him two other vessels, the Rio Negro and Asuncion, both
being fitted with wireless, thus facilitating their use for
intelligence purposes. Provided with eyes and ears, the
KARLSRUHE remained in the neighbourhood of Pernam-
buco, where she had already done so well, and in the
second fortnight of September added four more large
ships to her list of captures — the Highland Hope (5,150
tons), the Indrani (5,706 tons) ; the Cornish City (3,816
tons) ; and the Rio Iguassu (3,817 tons). All these ships,
except the Indrani, which, under the name of Hoffnung,
joined the KARLSRUHE'S force of supply ships, were sunk.
When the Germans boarded the Highland Hope, Lieu-
tenant Shrovder, with his armed party standing behind
him, confronted the British captain in his cabin. He de-
manded in a peremptory manner why the Highland Hope
had not stopped when requested to do so ; his displeasure
probably was not lessened by an arresting caricature
of the Kaiser which could hardly have escaped his notice.
He was so incensed that he threatened to have the master
(Mr. J. B. Thompson) taken to the cruiser and put in
irons. This intention was not, however, carried out, but
officers and men were directed to get their personal
belongings together, and in the meantime the German
seamen rummaged the ship, eating anything they could
CH. in] A SUCCESSION OF PRIZES 155
lay their hands on. The transfer to the Crefeld was not
effected without difficulty, and the engineer, weighing
about seventeen stone, in climbing up the rope ladder
while the ship was rising and falling in the swell, fell
back on the captain, who was attempting to help him.
The British seamen joined on board this German vessel
the captured crews of the Straihroy and the Maple
Branch. The men fairly took charge of the ship, all
hands singing, " It's a long way to Tipper ary." Thus
these brothers in misfortune began their enforced cruise
in the Crefeld. The cruiser remained stationary while
the Crefeld steamed to the west and the Rio Negro
steamed to the east, at distances enabling them to keep
in visual touch with the cruiser. Owing to the clear
atmosphere and the crow's nests at the mastheads, the
enemy covered a field with a front of about 140 miles.
On the 17th the Indrani l was captured, and then the
scouting was resumed. On the 21st the Dutch steamer
Maria, laden with wheat, from Portland, Oregon, for
Belfast and Dublin, was captured.8 The crew, consisting
of a motley crowd of Greeks, Chilians, and Arabs, had little
time to make their final preparations ; some of them
arrived on board the Crefeld in hard hats and wearing
their best suits ; others had no shirts or singlets, and were
without stockings. Some of the firemen had been called
straight from the stokehold, and were black with grime.
These men, like those of the Indrani, were greeted on
board with the singing of " It's a long way to Tipperary,"
and were then submitted to close questioning to learn the
latest news of the progress of the war.
A further interesting sidelight on the procedure followed
by the KARLSRUHE is furnished by the master of the
Cornish City (Mr. J. Bethke), who, together with his crew,
was taken on board the Rio Negro, where they were
" received with all friendliness" :
" By this time the cruiser's crew were busy connecting
fuses, etc., from the ship to the cruiser ready for blowing
up the Cornish City. The sea-cocks had already been
1 Master,- Mr. N. B. Pilcher.
a The Maria left Punta Arenas with a cargo of wheat for Belfast and
Dublin. She was sailing under the Dutch flag, and was subsequently
condemned by the German Prize Court on the plea that Belfast, the first
port of destination, had been declared a naval harbour on August 14th.
!56 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. ui
opened, and already the steamer could be seen to settle
down slowly. About this time we were joined by another
German steamer, the Crefeld, who, we were told, had
already on board five British crews of steamers that had
been captured and sunk. Only the same morning she
had taken a crew off a steamer which was found to be
carrying contraband, and therefore sunk. All our crew
were standing about the deck waiting to see the last of
the Cornish City, but only a small hole two feet square
had been blown into her, and she took a long time to sink,
and when she did finally take her last dive it was too dark
to see anything of her. She sank at 7.35 p.m. At 9 p.m.
the cruiser KARLSRUHE proceeded again, followed by the
Crefeld and the Rio Negro, steaming to the southward.
As I have already said, we were received with the utmost
kindness on board the Rio Negro and made as comfortable
as possible. This steamer is a passenger boat fitted to
carry 60 first-class and 200 second-class passengers. We
were all given first-class berths, with the exception of the
sailors and firemen, who were put into the third-class. Far
from being regarded as prisoners of war, we were treated
like first-class passengers throughout, everybody on board
combining to make us comfortable.
" September 22nd. — On this day, at 5 a.m., the cruisers
stopped an Italian and an Austrian steamer, but, after
being examined, they were allowed to proceed. At 7 a.m.
another steamer was sighted ; this turned out to be the
Rio Iguassu,1 a British steamer loaded with coal. She
was stopped and examined and the crew told to clear out.
But just then a Swedish steamer came along, and she must
have given the cruiser some information about a British
cruiser, for a few minutes later we were all under way again,
followed by the Rio Iguassu, and steering due west to
get clear of the track. As in the case of the Cornish City,
these steamers were held up right in the usual shipping
track, where at any moment a British cruiser might have
turned up. We steamed west until 1 p.m., when a stop
was made and the cruiser went alongside the Rio Iguassu
to bunker. Owing to the heavy swell, she found this to
be impossible, and she cast off again at 2 p.m., after which
a crowd of marines were sent on board to take off any
provisions. Several boat-loads were taken away, and then
1 Master, Mr. George Johnstone.
CH. m] SIX CAPTURED CREWS 157
she too was made ready to be blown up. The crew were
transferred to the Crefeld. Her sea-cocks were opened,
and at 5 p.m. she began to settle down by the stern. At
5.30 p.m. a hole was blown in her, and now she seemed to
be heeling over to port rapidly. We had a good view of
this steamer, and could see her going over all the time.
At 6 p.m. she suddenly turned right over on her beam
ends, and then, with a noise like a last groan, disappeared
beneath the water head first. It was a pitiful sight to see
a good ship like that destroyed, and it made us wish that
a British cruiser would come along and put a stop to this
ruthless and absolutely useless destruction of British
merchant ships. However, we were helpless in this matter,
and must put up with it. This evening we passed in
the saloon playing cards, draughts, and chess, with the
officers of this steamer, and we had a very pleasant time.
We are now beginning to wonder what they intend to do
with us, and when and where we are likely to be landed. The
worst trouble is that there is no means of letting our families
know what has happened, and we are afraid that if we do
not arrive at Rio by next Monday or Tuesday they will
begin to wonder, and of course at once imagine the worst.
We hope now that the Crefeld, having six crews on board,
must be nearly full, and that they will therefore transfer
us to her and send us in to one of the Brazilian ports.
" September 23rd. — Nothing of any consequence occurred
to-day. The cruiser and her two consorts are cruising
about all day looking for any foreign steamers, but none
are to be seen. A masthead lookout is being kept on board
the steamer continuously day and night. We are hoping
a British cruiser will come along soon, but it looks as if
we were fixed here for some time to come. We are passing
our time playing shuffleboard on deck in daytime, and cards
or chess in the cabin at nights. The captain and the
second mate are the only deck officers left on board here
now, and they are keeping an hour watch, as the chief
mate and the third mate were left in charge of a British
steamer in some port on the African coast, where they
are waiting ready to coal the cruiser if she should run short
of bunkers. I can't find out the name of this steamer,
but I have heard it is one of the Wilson liners. The crew
of her are on board the Crefeld.
" September 24>th. — Everybody is beginning to feel pretty
158 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
sick at being held up like this, as there seems no chance
of our being set ashore anywhere for some time. We are
still being treated as well as we could wish, but the time
hangs heavily on our hands, and we want to be on our
way home again. Even this steamer's crew wish a British
cruiser would come along and capture us, as they have
been out here cruising around for the last seven weeks,
and they begin to get tired of it, and they think, if a British
cruiser would capture us, she would send them all home.
This afternoon the news got around that the KARLSRUHE
is only looking for one more capture before sending us
all to Para, and nothing would suit us better if it were
only true. But I am afraid things will be pretty bad at
Para too, and we shall have a good deal of trouble to get
home from there. Well, we are hoping for the best, and
if we have to stay here for a month or so we shall be half
dead with ennui.
" September 25th. — This seems to be a day of rest, as
the cruiser and her two escorts are lying still and not
moving through the water for once. It appears that the
former is cleaning out some of her boilers. Our boats
have been over to her several times to-day taking pro-
visions, such as flour, beef, and sugar, and have brought
back an injured sailor for attendance by the doctor. Of
course, they have a surgeon on board the cruiser, but I
take it they wish to keep their hospitals clear, and have no
sick people on board, in case they should have to fight.
44 September 26th. — The three of us are still lying motion-
less in the same place, apparently while the cruiser is
executing repairs. I wish I could find out our where-
abouts, but the movements are kept very close. I think
we should be very near the Rocas and to the westward
of them, as we have been steering to the westward since
we left the track. The time passes very slowly with us
all, and we shall be glad when they land us.
44 Sunday, September 27th. — This is the first Sunday
we have spent as prisoners of war, and we earnestly hope
it will be the last, and that before next Sunday we shall
all have been landed at some port where we shall be able
to get a steamer for home. We have been lying idle all
the morning again, but at 2 p.m. we commenced to steam
again, taking a course to the southward. I heard there
was a steamer in some port on the South American coast,
CH. m] ANXIOUS PRISONERS 159
or rather in some unfrequented bay, where we are to go
to coal the cruiser. This may be true or not ; we hear
so many tales that we can't tell which to believe. If it
is true, we should reach the coast some time to-morrow —
that is, if I am right in my approximate position of the
ship. We are now twenty-four days out from home, and
to-morrow the owners will be expecting to hear of our arrival
at Rio de Janeiro. It's not likely they will have heard of
our capture, but if they don't hear by Wednesday they will
probably imagine something of the sort. I wish it were
possible to let them know about our being safe, because
our people will be sure to begin inquiring of the owners,
and if they can't hear anything definite about us they will
begin to worry about our safety. But we must wait
until we get to some port from where I can cable home.
Let's hope that it won't be too long to wait.
" September 28th. — We kept steaming all this morning
to the southward, and at 10 a.m. stopped, and the three
ships spread out so that each ship was just within sight
of one of the others. This looked as if we were looking
for something, and sure enough, at 2 a.m., we met another
German steamer, the Asuncion, of this same company.
Until 5 p.m. she kept in constant communication with
the cruiser and the Crefeld, and then she again steamed
away the same way she had come. We then remained
stationary for the remainder of the day and part of the
night.
44 September 2Qth. — In the early morning of this day we
again began to steam, but this time to the south-east,
and proceeded until 2 p.m., when we were again joined by
two other steamers. One of these steamers had the prize
crew of the Strathroy on board. She (the KARLSRUHE) had
taken the last of the coal out of her, and then, after
taking the prize crew off, had scuttled her. The Strathroy
is another British steamer the Germans had captured
and hid away in one of the many unfrequented bays on
the North Brazilian coast, to wait until her cargo of
coal would be wanted. Her original crew is on the
Crefeld now. At 3 p.m. the cruiser and the two strangers
steamed away, leaving the Crefeld and ourselves here to
wait for orders.
"September 30th. — This day has been a very gloomy
one for everyone on board, and has left everyone feeling
12
160 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
pretty miserable. At 7 o'clock this morning, whilst some
beef and potatoes were being sent over from our ship to
the Crefeld, the boat capsized and all the provisions were
spilt into the sea. This happened while the boat was being
lowered into the water, so that, luckily, no men were in her
and no lives were lost. At 10 a.m. the ship's doctor was
found dead in his room next to mine. He had been com-
plaining for a long time about a severe pain in his chest,
but no one dreamt that he was seriously ill, because he
always used to be about joking and playing with everyone.
It appears, however, that he had been unable to sleep
at nights for some time, and was in the habit of taking
morphia to induce sleep, and, his heart being weak, it was
unable to stand it. When he was found he had not been
dead for more than half an hour or so, but although the
doctor from the Crefeld came over at once, he was not able
to do anything. We buried him at 5 p.m., his body being
laid in a teak wood coffin and, covered with a German flag,
lowered into the sea. We feel awfully sorry for him, be-
cause he was a well-to-do man who only came to sea for
the benefit of his health, and was kept at sea owing to
the war.
" October 1st. — At daylight we were joined again by the
Asuncion, and she remained with us all day. We were
continually steaming at about half-speed all day, waiting
for the cruiser to return, but all we saw were one or two
merchant vessels, who got away all right, as there was no
one to chase them. We are all longing to hear some news
from home, and how the war is getting on. Yesterday
the doctor and the mate of the Crefeld told us that the
Germans had taken Paris and had driven the Russians
out of East Prussia altogether, but, of course, we don't
know how much of this is true.
" October 2nd. — At 9 o'clock this morning we sighted
the cruiser, accompanied by another large steamer, coming
towards us. This steamer turned out to be the Indrani,
of Liverpool. She is a large cargo steamer, and was cap-
tured by these people some weeks ago. Laden with
coal, she had been kept out of the way somewhere as a
collier for the cruiser, and a new name painted on her bows,
the Hoffnung. I suppose, after bunkering out of her,
the cruiser brought her back to act as a kind of scout
for us, for after getting under way for the track again,
CH. m] "A KIND OF HOTEL LIFE'* 161
about noon, the Asuncion steamed away to the northward,
while the Indrani went to the southward, both steamers
keeping just within sight on the horizon. To-day we heard
that a big battle has been won by the Germans against
the British Fleet, where the former are supposed to have
lost twenty-five torpedo-boats, while the losses of the
British were ninety torpedo-boats and six Dreadnoughts
and cruisers. I suspect these news are like all the war news
we get here, specially got up to cheer the hearts of the
Germans, and we don't take much notice of them. We
are now cruising around looking for other harmless mer-
chant vessels to sink ; wish we could run against the
GLASGOW or some other British cruiser, to put an end to
this destruction of British ships and send us home. There
has been no more talk as to when we are likely to be trans-
ferred and sent into a neutral port, so we have to just
sit and wait.
" October 3rd. — Nothing of any consequence occurred
to-day. The cruiser and her consorts were steaming due
east again until 5 p.m., when she stopped for the night,
apparently near the track. Of the Asuncion and the
Hoffnung we have seen nothing all day ; they have prob-
ably gone back to shelter.
" October 4th. — This is the second Sunday since we
came on board here, and everyone wishes they were at
home instead. As far as comfort is concerned, we have
nothing to complain about ; we have first-class cabins
and are having splendid food ; in fact, are living a kind of
hotel life, with nothing to do save eat, sleep, and drink.
There is no doubt we are a jolly sight better off than the
crews on board the Crefeld. Exclusive of her own crew,
there are now six other crews, of steamers that have been
sunk, on board her, in all about 200 people. She is so
crowded that we have heard the captains and officers
have to have their meals on deck ; and as she is only fitted
out for forty first-class passengers, a good few of them have
to sleep in the steerage. Besides this, she has no refri-
gerating machinery, being a much older ship than this,
so that they have to live on salt provisions practically.
Once or twice a week we send some fresh beef over to
her from this ship, and a few potatoes, but that, is all.
Now we are getting everything of the very best — fresh
provisions and fresh fruit every day, and can have as
162 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
much beer as we want. So we really have nothing
much to complain about; but we wish to get home,
and even good living does not make up for that. We
are in the track again now looking for ships, but there
do not seem to be any about. The three ships are lying
scattered all day, but before dark they are all close
together and lie all night. The weather is keeping very
warm and fine.
44 October 5th. — Still lying scattered looking for ships,
the three ships just within sight of one another. At
4 p.m. the cruiser sighted something, for she was off in
chase of some steamer, ourselves following at full speed.
At 6 o'clock the cruiser caught her quarry and stopped her,
but we did not get up to her until 7 p.m., and by this time
it was too dark to see who the steamer was. She seemed a
large boat, and must have been either English or French,
but the crew was transferred to the Crefeld and a prize
crew put on board to take charge. We heard she was
laden with coal, so they probably intend to keep her
for bunkering purposes like the Indrani. At midnight
she steamed away, leaving the cruiser and her two escorts
behind, and we stopped where we were all night. I
wonder if they will transfer us now and send us in to be
landed; as I mentioned some time ago, there has been
some talk of the Crefeld being nearly full of prisoners,
and that as soon as one more steamer was caught and
captured, we should be transferred to her and the lot of
us sent to be landed at a South American port. I only
hope it will turn out to be true.
" October 6th. — This morning we heard that the steamer
caught last night was the JParn,1 outward bound from
Cardiff. We had expected that she might have some news
about the war, but if she had it has been suppressed, and
we have heard nothing. The crew may have been able
to tell us something, but, as I have said, they have been
sent to the Crefeld. We were cruising around again this
morning looking for steamers, and at 3 p.m. one was sighted
1 After her capture the Farn (4,393 tons ; master, Mr. G. T. Alleyne)
put into San Juan (Porto Rico) on January llth, 1915, under the
command of a lieutenant taken out of the cruiser KARLSRUHE, her
mission being to obtain 'provisions. The State Department at Washington
declared that she was to be regarded as a naval tender, and twenty-four
hours were given for her to leave. At the end of that period the vessel
was interned.
CH. in] THE OVERCROWDED " CREFELD " 163
steering to the north-eastwards. She turned out to be the
Niceto de Larrinaga, l of Liverpool, homeward bound from
the River Plate with a cargo of foodstuffs. She was sighted
from this ship first, and the signal given to the cruiser, who
at once set off in chase. At 5 p.m. we came up with her,
a boat from the cruiser boarded her, and a little afterwards
we could see all the crew getting ready to leave the ship.
She is a fine steamer and looked nearly new, but of course,
being laden with grain, she was of no use to the cruiser,
and had to be sunk. It is a shame to see so many fine
steamers sunk, but so long as no British cruisers come here
to put a stop to it, they will no doubt continue. A lot
of time was taken up taking stores out of the ship for the
cruiser, especially potatoes, of which these ships are run-
oing short. At 9 p.m. the steamer began to settle, but the
hole blown into her must have been very small, for she was
a long time going down, taking a list first one way and then
the other. She settled down bodily until her engine-
room skylight was awash, after which she went down by
the head. I suppose her cargo helped to keep her afloat,
because it was 2 p.m. when at last she took her last
dive.
" October 7th. — This morning we could still see a lot of
wreckage floating around belonging to the steamer sunk
last night, such as boats, spars, and boxes. At 8 a.m. two
other steamers were seen, and the cruiser set off after
one of them, ourselves following him. The other steamer,
of course, managed to get away, so she had something to be
thankful for, because if the two of them had not happened
to be seen together, at the same time, both of them would
have been caught. The one we followed was the Lyn-
rott'an,8 of Liverpool, also homeward bound from the River
Plate, and laden with sugar, oats, etc. She also was
condemned and the crew transferred to the Crefeld, like
the crew of the steamer caught last night. Among her
crew were two ladies, and I was surprised they were taken
to the Crefeld, because that steamer must be getting pretty
overcrowded with all her ' prisoners of war.' She must
have at least 300 on board now, and, seeing that this
steamer is bigger and better than she is, it seems strange
that they should overcrowd her like that and leave this
1 Niceto de Larrinaga (5,018 tons; master, Mr. R F Nagle).
1 Lynrowan (3,384 tons ; master, Mr. Arthur Jones).
164 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
steamer with only one ship's crew on board. As far as
we are concerned, we should welcome some new arrivals,
for we may get some fresh news from them, but I suppose
they have their reasons for putting all the people on board
there. Each of the three steamers took a couple of boat-
loads of sugar out of the ship, and at 11 a.m. all the crew
were away and the ship ready for sinking. We did not
get a chance to see her sink at close quarters, because
both the Crefeld and the Rio Negro — that is, ourselves —
were ordered away to look for other steamers. However,
we could see from a distance that the cruiser was using
her for target practice, and was shooting at her. She
sank at 2 p.m. — this is now two ships sunk within
three days, and another one captured and detained, and
it seems strange to us that this should be allowed to go on.
Surely long before this the news must have reached home,
if not definitely, still, so many ships being so long overdue
must have given them some idea of what is going on here.
And yet the track is said to be clear — clear of British ship-
ping ; it will be before long if this goes on much longer.
We hear that there are some British cruisers on the South
American coast, and indeed there must be, for so many ships
to get as far as this in safety only to be caught here ; but
it is sure enough there is no British cruiser anywhere
around here, or it could not help spotting us, for we seldom
go far off the track.
44 October 8th. — At 6 a.m. a steamer was sighted, and the
cruiser set off in chase of her, bringing her up about 8 a.m.
She turned out to be the s.s. Cervantes,1 of Liverpool,
bound from the West Coast to Liverpool. Crew was
ordered off the ship ; the cruiser took a lot of provisions
off, and a hole was blown into her. At 11 a.m. she began
to sink. We were then ordered away to scout, and at
12.40 p.m. saw her disappear stern first. At 1 p.m. our
crew received orders to hold ourselves in readiness to be
transferred to the s.s. Crefeld. All this afternoon the Rio
Negro was away scouting, while the cruiser and the Crefeld
kept close together. At 6 p.m. closed up for the night.
44 October 9th. — At 1 a.m. another steamer was sighted,
and stopped by a shot across her bows, turning out to be
the s.s. Pruth,* of London, on a voyage from the West
1 Cervantes (4,635 tons; master, Mr. E. J. Holton).
a Pruth (4,408 tons; master, Mr. J. Evans).
CH. in] THE " FARN " AS A DECOY i65
Coast to St. Vincent for orders, with a cargo of nitrate.
Crew ordered to leave : at 6 a.m. crew transferred to the
s.s. Crefeld, and at 8 a.m. ourselves were ordered to be
sent across to the same steamer. By the time we came
on board, the Pruth was abandoned, and fuses fixed.
Two explosions occurred, one at 10.30 a.m. and the second
at 10.45, in the after part of the ship. She then began
to settle down rapidly, and at 11.20 sank stern first.
1 p.m., steaming to westward for scouting purposes.
At 4 p.m. turned to east-south-east. 7.30 p.m. we joined the
cruiser for the night. (3 p.m., stopped a large Spanish
steamer and examined her, but she was allowed to proceed
homeward. )
" October 10th. — At 3 a.m. the cruiser stopped and
examined an Italian steamer, allowing her to proceed
at 4 a.m. ; 9.30 a.m. the Cre/eld steamed away for scouting
purposes ; 5.45 rejoined the cruiser and the s.s. Rio
Negro and set a westerly course. Continued steaming all
night, apparently for the Rocas Islands to bunker the
cruiser.
" October llth. — Still steaming to westward at full
speed, about twelve miles per hour. We are finding a
great difference in the food and quarters to those we had
on the Rio Negro, but this is probably due to the great
number of prisoners of war and the fact that there is no
refrigerating machinery on board here. There are now
about 389 people on board here, prisoners of war, besides
the crew belonging to this steamer, so it can be imagined
that the ship is pretty crowded. 5 p.m. we came up
to the Farn. She was lying in company with a British
steamer, the Condor,1 bound from New York to the West
Coast with a general cargo. It appears that she found the
Farn flying the British flag, and signalled, asking the
Condor to stand by her, as she had trouble with her machin-
ery. The Farn is, of course, a British steamer of that
name, which was captured on October 5th and put under
1 The s.s. Condor (3,053 tons ; master, Mr. S. Purdy) constituted some-
what of a problem for the captain of the KARLSRUHE, as she carried a
general cargo of about 4,000 tons belonging to neutrals. At first it was
decided that, in view of the ownership of the cargo, the ship should not
be sunk. In the meantime, the work of discharging such goods as the
KARLSRUHE required went on by day and by night on October 12th and
13th. The captain of the KARLSRUHE took the master and crew out
of the ship later on, and on the 13th they left in the Crefeld, in company
with the other British seamen, for Tenerife.
166 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
the German flag. She knew that the cruiser was due to
arrive here, and tried to detain the Condor so that she
would be captured. Anyway, the ruse succeeded, and then
the cruiser came on the scene just in time. She then
boarded her, and the crew was ordered to leave her. She
was abandoned at 8 p.m., and the steamer kept till the
morning, to allow the crew of the cruiser to get at some
of the cargo.
" October 12th. — The cruiser is busy all this morning
getting some of the cargo out of the Condor. She has a
lot of oils and milk among her cargo, and this is just
what the cruiser and her escorts need. Our boats are help-
ing her, so there seems no chance of getting away to-day.
" October I3th. — Boats still busy this morning getting
cargo from the Condor. 11.30 a.m., heard that we are
to leave at 4 o'clock this afternoon. 4 p.m., cruiser
hoisted signals L E X & T D L, which meant 4 Dismissed ;
wish you a pleasant voyage.' Began our homeward jour-
ney at 4.30 p.m., steering to the north-eastward, bound
for Tenerife."
The cruise of the KARLSRUHE was nearing its end.
Reports of the destruction she was spreading had already
led to the necessary measures being taken by the British
naval authorities to put a stop to her career. But before
the end came she effected three more captures — the
Glanton (3,021 tons) on October 18th; the Hurstdale
(2,752 tons) on the 23rd ; and the Vandyck (10,328 tons)
on the 26th, the last-named being captured 410 miles
from Cape St. Roque. The Glanton (master, Mr. George
Arthur) had shipped a cargo of coal and general merchandise
from Barry to Montevideo. When she was overhauled
by the KARLSRUHE, at 10 a.m. on October 18th, the vessel
was on the usual trade route between Cape Verde Islands
and Fernando Noronha. After the master and crew had
been taken off, and everything in the shape of oil, stores,
rope, etc., had been commandeered, the Glanton was sunk
by explosive charges. The KARLSRUHE then resumed her
cruise, and five days later fell in with the Hurstdale (master,
Mr. John Williams), which was on passage from Rosario
to Bristol with maize ; and three days afterwards she came
across the Vandyck (master, Mr. Anthony Cadogan), which
was proceeding to New York. She shared the same fate
CH. in] THE 4l KARLSRUHE'S " LAST PRIZE 16T
as the other ships. If it were only because the Vandyck
was the KARLSRUHE'S last success, her fate and the ex-
periences of those on board would be of interest ; and it
happens that in this instance some notes are available
of an American citizen who was travelling on board this
British ship at the time :
44 Our ship Vandyck, captured October 26th, lat.
1° 14' S. and long. 40° 42' W., by the German cruiser
KARLSRUHE.
44 All on board the Vandyck were transferred to the old
(1895) Hamburg South American cargo-boat Ascuncion.
44 If you refer to Register of Shipping, you will appreciate
the conditions confronting our passengers and crew of
410 souls, added to fifty-one officers and crew of two pre-
viously captured British cargo steamers, together with
fifty officers and crew of the said Asuncion.
44 Under stress, men alone usually fear for themselves
and say little about it, but when you realise that more
than fifty of the people sent on board the old Asuncion
were women and children, most of them ladies unaccus-
tomed to those roughest of conditions, you will understand
the intolerable state of affairs that met them when the
transfer was made from the Vandyck to the Asuncion.
The nearest port — Para — could have been reached in thirty
hours ; instead of which the Asuncion was kept going at
about 2 knots per hour, on longitude (more or less) 45°
W., just above the Equator, until our days of probation
were ended, and we were landed at Para, November 2nd.
44 The women behaved remarkably well from the first
shock of being under the guns of the man-of-war until the
end, relying on the men who surrounded them — and
their faith was not misplaced.
44 Once on board the Asuncion, the women and children
were packed in the few cabins on board, including the
officers' quarters, and the men slept on the decks and any-
where they could find stowage place.
44 Food was brought on board from the Vandyck and
cooked as best might be, and served by the volunteer
cooks and stewards of our English crew — all praise be
given to them for the fact !
44 The officers of the KARLSRUHE, as well as of the
Asuncion, were courteous — but then, Navy men and
108 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
sailors aie gentlemen all over the world, and live up to the
standard, particularly where ladies are concerned. . . .
44 When captured we were on the accustomed route
from Cape St. Roque to Trinidad, and had steamed all
our voyage in darkness at night — all to no avail, as we
were captured in full daylight, 11.30 a.m.
44 The five merchant steamers (captured or otherwise)
spread out, and scouting in zigzag, in touch by wireless
with the KARLSRUHE, formed a net impossible to evade,
no matter what course we might have made.
44 KARLSRUHE has no intention of fighting, her mission
is to destroy shipping. She can easily escape anything
so far sent after her. From horizon to being under her guns
she was twenty-six minutes. She came down on us at
the rate of 28 knots. They say she can do 30 — despite
her months in commission and consequent fouling.
44 She has captured, up to October 24th, sixteen British
cargo steamers, having sunk all but three. Vandyck was
number seventeen — October 26th.
44 The weather was good during our cruise about the
Equator — fortunately so, as the old Asuncion was flying
light, very little coal, no ballast excepting some hard-
wood beams (for gun mounting) on the main deck just
where they would do the most damage in case of bad
weather. As much as was possible we were kept in ignor-
ance of our ship's position, probable port of landing
and date of same, until the night of October 31st, when we
bore away to the westward — for Para — and finally landed
there on November 2nd. Two hotels were presented for
our passengers, and the good people on shore lent every
assistance. It was a new lease of life to all of us. Some
of the ladies collapsed when relieved of the greater strain,
but finally they recovered.
44 Six days more of waiting cheerfully passed, despite
the great heat, and on November 8th, the Brazilian
steamer San Paulo took on board all of the ladies and chil-
ren (excepting fotfr couples who chose to remain for the
next boat), together with the men to the extent of fifty
more than the San Paulo's passenger certificate as arranged
officially. The men continued to sleep on the deck and
in the passages.
44 We arrived New York, November 19th, and were thank-
ful. S.s. Byron and s.s. Sceptre bring on remainder of
CH. in] HOW " ROYAL SCEPTRE " WAS SAVED 169
our passengers, crews, and third class — all of whom were
comfortably cared for in the meantime.
*' A tribute is certainly due to our English officers
and crew of the Vandyck, also to the owners, Lamport &
Holt, who, although there was no legal obligation whatever
to do so, paid our ordinary hotel expenses at Para and our
passage to New York."
Before she was at length forced to abandon her
career, the KARLSRUHE came across the steamer Royal
Sceptre (3,838 tons) on passage from Santos, Brazil, to
New York, with a cargo of coffee valued at £230,000.
The master (Mr. W. H. Estill) was successful in saving
not only the ship, but the cargo. He was proceeding
on his course on the night of October 27th when, under
the light of the moon, a four- funnelled warship, accom-
panied by three steamers, was noticed. They appeared
to be stopped and showed no lights. " I suspected,"
the master afterwards stated, "that the former was a
German vessel; but thinking any attempt on my part
to elude it was only the more likely to cause suspicion,
I decided to keep on my course. On getting closer,
my suspicions were confirmed, and when abeam of her
at 11.30 p.m. I was ordered to stop. An officer and
an armed guard were put on board, the former informing
me I was stopped by the German cruiser KARLSRUHE."
And then the master gave particulars of how he outwitted
the enemy : " Previous to this, I must state, I had taken
the precaution to hide my seventy-five Bills of Lading
and other papers relating to the cargo, relying for exami-
nation on my Brazilian clearance, Brazilian and American
Bills of Health, detailed manifest of cargo for Customs
New York Register, and Articles. Seeing that 60,025
bags of coffee were via New York in transit for Toronto,
Canada, and were specified to this effect on Bills of Lading,
I felt sure it would be disastrous to the ship if they were seen
by the Germans; hence my reason for this action. On
being asked by the officer for my papers, etc., I produced
the aforementioned, and after replying to the numerous
questions re cargo, etc., in a way I thought suitable for
the occasion, and, if not altogether truthful, quite in order
considering the serious position I was in, he appeared
satisfied that the cargo was for New York only, and even-
170 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
tually conveyed the necessary information to the captain
of the "KARLSRUHE. At 12.30 a.m. on October 28th, I
was informed I could proceed, and at once ran full speed
ahead again, thinking I was very lucky, which was the last
remark the officer made as he left me."
The cruiser was fortunate in intercepting a number of
large coal cargoes, and the captain obtained, in all,
nearly 20,000 tons of coal from his prizes. Similarly,
from all the ships which were intercepted, stores, foodstuffs,
and wines were abstracted in order to replenish the cruiser's
supplies, as well as any plate or crockery which took the
fancy of the boarding-parties. The Germans, as has been
indicated, treated the captured crews generally with
courtesy, and returned to the merchant officers all their
private property, including their revolvers and guns.
Before passing on to describe the memorable exploits
of the German cruiser EMDEN, some reference must be
made to another corsair, the armed merchant cruiser
KRONPRINZ WILHELM. On the outbreak of war the Nord-
deutscher liner KRONPRINZ WILHELM was one of the large
German ships in New York Harbour which caused the
Admiralty a good deal of anxiety in view of the reports
that they were being armed and might put to sea at any
moment. These rumours had various sources, and they
seemed to fit in with the theoiies which had inspired Ger-
many's action at The Hague Conference, and later on at
the Naval Conference at London. The KRONPRINZ WIL-
HELM, however, was the only one of the enemy ships
which got to sea from New York, and she broke out on
the eve of the British declaration of war, before the Ameri-
can authorities had perfected their arrangements for watch-
ing enemy shipping. This liner, indeed, left as though
she had no belligerent purpose. All doubts, however,
as to her mission were set at rest on August 6th, when
Rear-Admiral Christopher Cradock, with his flag in the
cruiser SUFFOLK, came upon the KRONPRINZ WILHELM,
about 120 miles north-east of Watling Island, in the West
Indies, in company with the cruiser KARLSRUHE. Guns
and guns' crews were being transferred when the SUFFOLK,
in company with the light cruiser BRISTOL, appeared.
The KRONPRINZ WILHELM made off in one direction, and
her consort in the other. The British Admiral had to make
choice of his quarry, and he selected the man-of-war,
CH. in] " KRONPRINZ WILHELM'S " OPERATIONS 171
sending the BRISTOL on ahead at full speed, and at the
same time calling up by wireless the armoured cruiser
BERWICK. Neither of the British ships equalled the
speed of the German cruiser, which was consequently
able to elude capture, though she nearly fell to the BER-
WICK, as subsequently appeared. The KRONPRINZ WIL-
HELM seems then to have coaled from the Walhalla off
the Azores, and on September 19th took her first prize—
the s.s. Indian Prince (2,846 tons). The capture took place
210 miles east of Pernambuco, indicating that the liner
was operating in the same waters as the KARLSRUHE.
The Indian Prince left the port of Bahia, Brazil, on Sep-
tember 2nd, for New York. On the evening of Septem-
ber 4th, when the Indian Prince was well off the usual
trade route, in accordance with Admiralty instructions,
the KRONPRINZ WILHELM was sighted. No resistance to
capture was made, the British vessel steaming ahead of
the German auxiliary cruiser throughout the night. The
following day two German naval officers boarded the
Indian Prince and took away with them her papers, as
well as all charts, chronometers, binoculars, rockets,
blue lights, and the British Ensign. In accordance with
orders from the KRONPRINZ WILHELM, the British vessel
steered on various courses until September 8th, when she
was directed to stop in mid-ocean and the German auxi-
liary cruiser came alongside. An officer, accompanied by
an armed guard, proceeded on board, and handed the master
(Mr. J. R. Gray) a notification in German, accompanied
by an English translation, as follows :
" 1 hereby give you the official proclamation :
" 1. Your ship is hostile.
" 2. The cargo of your ship are hostile goods.
"3. You must immediately go with all your crew on
board of the auxiliary. Personal goods may be taken
along.
"4. Resistance will result compulsion (sic).
" (Signed) THIERFELDER,
* ' Lieutenant Commander. ' '
The crew, passengers, and effects having been transferred
to the KRONPRINZ WILHELM, the work of looting the ship
was begun, and continued throughout the night, all the
172 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
stores and coal being transferred to the KRONPRINZ WIL-
HELM. Finally the British vessel was sunk.
More than a month elapsed before this German auxiliary
cruiser captured another British vessel. The s.s. La
Correntina (8,529 tons), the Vice-Consul at La Plata
having stated that no local danger had been reported,
was on her way to Liverpool with a cargo of frozen
meat weighing 3,500 tons, the property of the British
military authorities, when the KRONPRINZ WILHELM was
sighted early on the morning of October 7th. " I then
kept the ship away to the eastward," the master (Mr.
A. Murrison) subsequently recorded, " to see if the
vessel would follow. He still kept end on and ap-
peared to be steaming slowly towards us, allowing us to
pass. Consequently I took him to be a British or French
auxiliary cruiser. But when well astern on our port quarter
he came rushing on at full speed and, when half a mile
off, he opened out his starboard side, and at the same time
signalled to us to stop instantly. He also hoisted his
ensign, and then we found he was a German. I complied
and stopped our ship, and he came alongside our port
side (about fifty yards), and I then found that he had about
200 men with rifles, and other men stationed at two
12-pounders on his forecastle head, covering our ship
fore and aft." The wireless operator of the La Correntina
sent out a signal for help, but no reply was received.
The ship was subsequently ordered to be abandoned, the
passengers and crew being transferred, with their personal
belongings, to the KRONPRINZ WILHELM, as the ship, so
it was stated, would be sunk in an hour. However, they
did not sink her as threatened. "In the meantime
the cruiser backed astern and came up on our starboard
side, smashing our boats and davits and bridge deck,
and her men swarmed on board and took charge of the
bridge, engine-room, and the ship generally. Then a gang-
way was put out between the vessels, and passengers and
crew and their baggage were transferred to the cruiser,
after which the ships parted and steamed away to the
eastward in company." l The British vessel was sunk on
1 The crew and passengers of La Correntina were transferred about a
week later to the supply ship Sierra Cordoba, which met the KBONPBINZ
WILHELM at a rendezvous with a quantity of coal, but it was not until
November 9th that the two vessels parted company, the Sierra Cordoba
eventually landing her British passengers at Montevideo on the 22nd.
CH. in] "LA CORRENTINA'S " GUNS 173
October 14th, after being stripped of all the stores and a good
deal of coal, besides some deck gear, provisions, and guns.
This vessel was one of the ships embraced in the Ad-
miralty scheme of defensive armament. When she left
Liverpool on her voyage to La Plata, she mounted two
4 "7-inch guns aft, and was provided with complete gun
crews ; but, having sailed before the outbreak of war, she
had no ammunition on board. This was an unfortunate
circumstance, as the KRONPRINZ WILHELM had only a
light armament. In his report the master stated that,
" owing to the suddenness of the attack, the two 4 "7-inch
guns fell into the enemy's hands complete, as we had no
time to disable them." A bag of dispatches from the
British Legation was, however, weighted and thrown
overboard in accordance with instructions received from
the Consul-General of Buenos Ayres. After the British
ship had been sunk, the KRONPRINZ WILHELM steamed
north-westward, making for Cape Frio, off which she
arrived about midnight on October 16th. She was appar-
ently on the lookout for another vessel. From statements
made by the captain of the s.s. Niceto de Larranaga,
the suspicion was strengthened that the German ships
operating in the neighbourhood of Pernambuco were kept
closely informed of the names of steamers traversing the
American and English tracks to and from the River Plate,
learning their dates of departure as well as the character
of their cargoes. The enemy, it was alleged, was aware
that the s.s. La Correntina had no ammunition on board.1
The KRONPRINZ WILHELM did not capture another British
ship until December 4th. She then met the Bellevue (3,814
tons). This vessel was well laden with a coal and general
cargo, and was on her way from Glasgow to Montevideo.
The Bellevue (master, Mr. Iver Iversen) was about forty-six
miles east- north- east of Pernambuco when the German mer-
chant cruiser overtook her at full speed in the early morning.
The usual routine was followed, the crew was transferred
1 On August 4th, as soon as war was declared, Messrs. Houlder Bros.,
the owners of the La Correntina and other ships of the same line, wrote
to the Admiralty suggesting that the ammunition for La Correntina
should be sent to Buenos Ayres by their La Roserina, leaving Liverpool on
August 8th and due at Buenos Ayres on August 30th. This arrangement
was approved, but the ammunition on board the La Roserina was unshipped
in the belief that she would not reach the Plate before the sailing of the
La Correntina.
174 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
to the KRONPRINZ WILHELM, and the British ship, navi-
gated by a prize crew, was taken to the westward, when the
work of transhipping the cargo and stores to the cruiser
was begun. This operation lasted from December 8th
to 20th, when the Bellevue was sunk. In this case, the
ship had been kept well off the usual trade route, and the
master was complimented by the Admiralty on the manner
in which he had conformed to Admiralty instructions.
The KRONPRINZ WILHELM rounded off the month with
another capture not far from the scene of her meeting
with the Bellevue. The Hemisphere (3,486 tons ; master,
Mr. Richard Jones) was on passage from Hull to Buenos
Ayres with coal when the KRONPRINZ WILHELM headed
for her on the 28th. After the capture had been effected,
both vessels steamed away to the eastward until early in
the morning of December 30th, when the Hemisphere was
brought alongside the cruiser and her cargo, stores, and
most useful fittings were taken on board the. KRONPRINZ
WILHELM. In this case, as in others, the master and
crew were called upon to sign a declaration undertaking
not to take up arms against the German Empire during
the war. The German vessel was joined by her tender,
the s.s. Holger, to which the Hemisphere's officers and
men were transferred, after which the KRONPRINZ WILHELM
steamed away to the northward.
About this time the Royal Mail Steamship Company's
s.s. Potaro (4,419 tons), which had left Liverpool in
ballast on December 25th, was on her way to Monte-
video. Half an hour after midnight on January 10th,
she sighted, at a distance of about three miles, a large
steamer, which turned out to be the KRONPRINZ WILHELM.
The British master's attempt to escape failed, and after
an hour's chase the Potaro was captured. A call for
help was sent out three times during the pursuit, but
the wireless operator of the German ship jambed all
messages. A prize crew having been placed on board,
the two vessels proceeded in a south-easterly direction,
and the same afternoon the master and crew were trans-
ferred to the KRONPRINZ WILHELM. The Potaro then
steamed away, and according to the master (Mr. Henry
J. Bennett) was not seen again till January 19th. Then
she appeared with everything painted man-of-war colour
and with extra aerials aloft. In the meantime the
CH. m] A STUBBORN LITTLE CRAFT 175
German ship had secured two more prizes — the s.s. Highland
Brae (7,634 tons; master, Mr. R. R. Pond), which was
on passage from Gravesend to Buenos Ayres, and the
sailing-ship Wilfrid M. (258 tons ; master, Mr. C. W.
Parks), proceeding to Bahia from St. John's, Newfound-
land. The former ship was taken by surprise. She was
well off the usual track, in obedience to Admiralty in-
structions, when the KRONPRINZ WILHELM appeared
" keeping end on and enveloped in smoke, so that we were
unable to distinguish whether she was British or German
until within half or three-quarters of a mile off, when she
hoisted the German ensign, fired a gun, and signalled to
us to stop." Subsequently a prize crew was put on board,
and the two steamers proceeded in company until the Wilfrid
M. was sighted. The captain of the German ship could
not resist the temptation to intercept this vessel, small
as she was, but later on he probably regretted his decision.
She was carrying a cargo of dried fish. The gunners of
the German ship had already proved, by demonstration,
their inefficiency, and there was a shortage of ammunition.
At any rate, it was decided to ram the small wooden vessel.
Probably the subsequent course of events constitutes one
of the most curious incidents in this war. After the crew
had been taken on board, the great German liner proceeded
to ram the Wilfrid M. Four times in succession the bow
of the KRONPRINZ WILHELM was driven into the little
ship, and even then she was not sunk. At the end of April
1915, the General Registrar of Shipping at Grenada
reported to the Board of Trade that " a large portion of
a derelict ship was seen drifting off the south coast of
the Island of Carriacou, a dependency of the Government
of this island, which finally settled off the reef of Dumfries
Bay, about 600 yards from shore." On examination it
was found to be the remains of the Wilfrid M.9 which the
German liner, in spite of all her efforts, had failed to sink.
During the rest of January the Germans were busy
looting the Highland Brae, and afterwards the Potaro
was dealt with in the same way. Early in February the
four-masted Norwegian barque Semantha, carrying grain
from Portland, Oregon, to Falmouth or Queenstown for
orders, was captured and afterwards sunk, the crew having
been transferred to the German vessel. In this instance
again the gunners of the KRONPRINZ WILHELM showed a
13
176 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
lack of practice, since, of the thirteen shots which were
fired at the barque, only one took effect. The looting of
the Potaro was then resumed, and on February 12th the
tender Holger was brought alongside ; a high sea was
running, and the two ships bumped heavily as the
transfer of passengers took place. The transhipment
proved a dangerous task, but was at last completed, and
then the Holger parted company, landing her passengers, on
February 18th, at Buenos Ayres, where she was interned.
The KRONPRINZ WILHELM met with no further success
until February 22nd, when the British s.s. Chasehill
(4,583 tons) was intercepted on her passage from Newport
News to Zarate, La Plata, with coal. The master (Mr.
R. H. Kidd) and the crew were transferred to the KRON-
PRINZ WILHELM, and a prize crew was put on board the
Chasehill. The German vessel then took out of the British
ship practically all the coal. On March 9th the crew were
retransferred to the Chasehill, together with the crew
and passengers of the French mail steamer Guadaloupe,
which the KRONPRINZ WILHELM had captured some days
before, to find that their ship had been much damaged
during the process of transhipping the coal. The Chasehill,
with her French passengers and seamen, reached Pernam-
buco early on the morning of March 12th.
It appeared later on that the KRONPRINZ WILHELM,
though she had obtained considerable quantities of coal
and general stores which would have enabled her to seek
fresh scenes of activity, still continued her depredations
on the trade route which had already proved so fruitful.
On March 24th, the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company's
s.s. Tamar (3,207 tons), with a large cargo of coffee, from
Santos to Havre, was captured. On sailing, the master
(Mr. F. S. Hannan) was warned to stand to the eastward,
and was attempting to avoid danger when he was over-
hauled by the German raider. As usual, the British crew
were transferred, and then the Tamar was sunk by gun-
fire. A declaration of neutrality during the war was
required from the crew and passengers. The KRONPRINZ
WILHELM then resumed her course, and on the 27th fell
in with the British s.s. Coleby (3,824 tons), which was bound
from Rosario with a cargo of wheat. By this time,
according to the master of the Tamar, the KRONPRINZ
WILHELM showed signs of damage through having several
CH. in] THE " PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH " 177
vessels lashed alongside of her, and practically every plate
on the port side was standing out throughout her length.
In this case also the capture was due to mischance, as the
master of the Coleby (Mr. William Crighton) was well off
the usual track. With the sinking of this vessel the
active career of the KRONPRINZ WILHELM came to an end.
Her captain, in view of her condition, including shortage
of coal and stores, decided to abandon his depredations.
The cruiser cast anchor in Hampden Roads on April llth,
after a cruise covering a period of over eight months.
A fortnight later she was interned at Newport News.1
The only other German liner which engaged in commerce-
destruction was the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH, which got
out of Tsingtau on the outbreak of war, and finally reached
Newport News, Virginia, on March llth, 1915, after a cruise
of seven months, during which she sank five British mer-
chant ships, and in addition excited American public
opinion by destroying the United States' William P.
Frye. The PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH was homeward bound
at the end of July when she was recalled to Tsingtau,
and, mails and passengers having been disembarked, she
was filled up with coal, armed with guns taken from
the gunboats LUCHS and TIGER, repainted, and sent to
sea, proceeding to the Mariana Islands, where she joined
the ScHARNfloRST, GNEISENAU, and other German men-
of-war. Her subsequent career was, in the main, dis-
appointing to the Germans. She joined von Spee at the
Marshall Islands, and was detached by him in company
with the CORMORAN (ex RIASAN), a Russian capture made
by the EMDEN and armed at Tsingtau, for commerce-
destruction. After an unsuccessful cruise she went to
look for coal among the German Pacific Islands, and finally
obtained some at Malekula (Pelew Islands). Then she
rejoined von Spee off Valparaiso, but parted from him before
the Falklands action. Though she had chased the British
s.s. Colusa on November 1st, it was not until December 5th
that the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH made her first capture.
1 In order to enable a good lookout to be kept, the captain of the KRON-
PRINZ WILHELM had a barrel lashed to the mast about 200 feet above sea-
level, and later on another barrel was lashed to the mainmast, and thus
a double lookout was kept by men provided with powerful glasses. Ac-
cording to the master of the Bellevue, an officer of the KRONPRINZ WILHELM
stated that British cruisers had been seen on several occasions, but the
German corsair had not been observed by them, and had had time to run
away.
178 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
She was cruising about seventy miles south of Valparaiso,
in a fog, when she came upon the British s.s. Charcas
(5,067 tons), steaming from Corral to Guayacan, Chile,
en route to New York, with a small load of nitrate of
soda. The master (Mr. A. C. Norris) was hugging the shore
as closely as possible when the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH
intercepted her, following the same routine as in the case
of the other raider's. On December 12th the German ship
fell in with the sailing-vessel Kildalton, on passage from
Liverpool to Callao. Before the ship was sunk, the master
(Mr. W. Sharp) and crew were taken on board the cruiser
and eventually landed at Easter Island. There they re-
mained marooned from the last day of the year which had
seen the outbreak of the war till February 26th, when they
were taken off by a Swedish steamer and landed at Panama
on March 12th.
Exactly two months elapsed before the PRINZ EITEL
FRIEDRICH had another success, and again her capture
was a small ship — the s.v. Invercoe (1,421 tons), which was
carrying wheat from Portland, Oregon, to a British port.
This proved an easy capture, and after the master (Mr.
Wm. J. King) and crew had been transferred, she was
sunk. Less than a week later the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH
had better fortune. When off Pernambuco, in the area
in which the KARLSRUHE and the KRONPRINZ WILHELM
had operated with such effect, she fell in with the s.s.
Mary Ada Short (3,605 tons ; master, Mr. A. E. Bob-
bing) on February 18th. This ship, loaded with maize,
was proceeding from Rosario and St. Nicholas (St. Vin-
cent) for orders, when the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH was
sighted. After provisions had been removed, a dyna-
mite charge was placed in the engine-room, and, as this
proved ineffective, two shots were fired into the hull,
and the vessel then disappeared. Two days later it was
the ill-fortune of the s.s. Willerby (3,630 tons) to be en-
countered by the German merchant cruiser while proceed-
ing from Marseilles to Buenos Ayres in water ballast. All
went well until February 20th, when the master (Mr.
J. Wedgwood) was ordered by the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH
to stop. He ignored the signal, but three-quarters of an
hour later was overhauled. On March llth, the PRINZ
EITEL FRIEDRICH, whose cruise had been barren since
the capture of the Willerby, put into Newport News for
CH. m] COMMERCE-DESTROYER INTERNED 179
repairs. On arrival the captain found he had gravely
prejudiced himself in the eyes of the American public by
sinking the American s.s. William P. Frye, which had on
board wheat consigned to a British port. The story of
the destruction of this ship, though she was not of British
nationality, is of such historical importance from many
points of view that it may be of interest to give the state-
ment made by her captain (Mr. H. H. Kiehne) after he
had been landed by the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH at New-
port News.
On January 27th he was approached by the PRINZ
EITEL FRIEDRICH in the South Atlantic. Having made
the usual inquiries, the German captain told him that he
deemed his cargo contraband, and proposed to destroy
it. Captain Kiehne protested, but German officers and
men came on board and began to jettison the grain.
The PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH then disappeared after
another ship, and when she reappeared, to use Captain
Kiehne's words, " evidently the grain was not being
thrown overboard fast enough to suit the German skipper,
for he sent half a hundred men aboard soon afterwards,
and the work went on for hours without interruption.
However, it was slow at the best, and I was informed the
next morning that my ship would be sent to the bottom.
It was originally the intention of the German captain to
leave enough cargo in the hold of the ship for ballast.
That part of the grain was to be rendered useless by salt
water. As soon as I was informed that my ship was to be
sent to the bottom, I and my wife, with our two boys
and the crew, made for the German steamer in our own
boats. We were taken on board and shown every courtesy
throughout the remainder of the voyage."
Investigation after her arrival at Newport News showed
that the PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH required new boilers,
and on April 8th she was interned on the application of
her captain, who handed to the collector of the port the
following statement :
" I inform you that I intend to intern S.M.S. PRINZ
EITEL FRIEDRICH. The relief I expected appear not to
arrive in time, so number and force of enemy cruisers
watching the entrance of the bay makes to me impossible
the dash for the open sea with any ho^e of success. I
180 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
have decided not to deliver the crew and the ship to fruit-
less and certain destruction. Being obliged for the
courtesy shown by all the United States authorities, I am
expecting your orders. I have sent same information to
Rear- Admiral Helm, of the United States ship ALABAMA."
Another commerce-destroyer was the cruiser LEIPZIG,
a vessel of small tonnage which formed one of the units
under the command of Admiral von Spee. Within about
six weeks of the opening of the war, the LEIPZIG made
her first capture. On September llth the s.s. Elsinore
(6,542 tons) was on her passage from Corinto to San Luis
Obispo, California, in ballast, when she was encountered
by the LEIPZIG, a warning shot announcing that the
stranger was a foreign cruiser. In this case the master
(Mr. J. Roberts) was taken on board the German ship,
and received orders to return and navigate his vessel
in accordance with instructions received from the German
commander. Various courses were then steered, the
German s.s. Marie being at that time in company with
the LEIPZIG. Captain Roberts made the following state-
ment as to his experience, which indicates the course
pursued by the commander of the LEIPZIG in his efforts
to intercept British merchantmen :
" September llth. — At 4.10 a.m. I arrived on board of
my own vessel, and set the engines at full speed and course
was set N. 62° E.
" 5.20 a.m. I was signalled by Morse to alter my course
to S. 15° E., and again at 9.25 a.m. was signalled to steer
S. 45° E. ; then I began to get anxious wondering when we
were to leave (the ship), as I was at this time fifty miles
from the land.
" At 10.10 a.m. I was signalled to make the best possible
speed, and at 10.30 a.m. we sighted a cargo steamer ahead
which proved to be a German ship named the Marie,
but which at first I thought to be a poor unfortunate
like myself owing to his movements, but I afterwards
found out that he was only obeying orders from the
LEIPZIG, and that the meeting was prearranged, and that
the Marie was in company with the LEIPZIG, supplying
her with coal and stores.
" At 11.15 a.m. I was again signalled to heave to and to
CH. m] A MASTER'S DIARY 181
proceed on board of the Marie, taking sufficient stores for
eight days, and they allowed us two hours to be out of the
vessel, so I immediately proceeded to carry out these
orders ; in the meantime a number of armed officers
and men from the LEIPZIG came on board and commenced
ransacking the ship, taking all stores and articles which
were of any use to them, and they also took our boats
and hoisted them up in the davits of the Marie ; our
position at this time was 19° 31' 00" N., and 105° 56' 00" W.
" At 12.30 p.m. myself and crew boarded the Marie,
and at 1.10 p.m. the cruiser commenced firing upon the
Elsinore at about a mile distant ; the sight was too heart-
breaking for me to witness, so I kept to my room, but my
officers afterwards informed me that (they) put twelve
shots into her and she became ablaze, and that she sank
stern first ; before my vessel sank the captain of the
Marie was ordered to go full speed on a south-easterly
course ; and so came the end of one of the finest oil-
steamers on the Pacific Coast.
" When first taken prisoner by the Germans, the com-
mander promised to cast me off a few mites from Cape
Corrientes, which he afterwards failed to do, and I think
the reason was that he was rather anxious for his own
safety.
" September 12th. — The Marie proceeding on the same
course S.E., and during the day the cruiser would lead
ahead at about three miles distant, and by night about
the same distance astern. There was an armed crew of
about fourteen men placed on board the Marie from the
cruiser to guard my men. The commander of the cruiser
signalled to the officer in charge to treat my men as well
as possible.
" September 13th. — Ordered to stop by the cruiser, when
they passed several hundred coal-bags on board to be
filled by my men, whom they would pay their usual rate of
wages. Both ships proceeding same course and direction.
" September I4>th. — Again stopped by cruiser, and more
coal-bags passed on board to be filled by my men : ship's
course the same and convoyed by the cruiser.
" September 15th and 16th. — Proceeding same and posi-
tion of ship the same ; we are steering for the Galapagos
Islands.
" September 17th. — Sighted Galapagos Islands, 7 a.m. ;
182 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. m
came to anchor in Tagus Cove, Atternave Island, and at
11.30 p.m. the cruiser came alongside and commenced to
bunker. 7 p.m., owing to cove being so small, the cruiser
cast off and went to a safer anchorage. Previous to her
going away the commander sent for me to come on board ;
he then told me that he would faithfully land us all safe
at Callao, and how sorry he felt for me in such a position,
and, being a sailor himself, he was sorry that he had been
obliged to destroy such a fine ship. Then I informed him
that I had a bag of mail on board from the American
cruiser DENVER for San Francisco, which he promised he
would safely deliver.
" September 18th; — The cruiser came alongside at 6 a.m.,
and again commenced to bunker, and at 9 a.m. completed
500 tons. At 11.30 a.m. both ships got under weigh
and proceeded out of the cove at full speed, and course
was set south.
44 September 19th. — Came to anchor off Hood Island,
Galapagos, at 8.80 a.m., and the cruiser left and proceeded
for Chatham Island for fresh provisions, which I still
believe was not necessary, as he had more important
business in view.
" September 2Qth. — Ship still at anchor off Hood Island,
and at 6 p.m. I am positive I saw two distinct smokes
from steamers in the direction of Chatham Island, and this
proved to be correct, as the cruiser had another steamer
awaiting with her stores, etc., and equipped with wireless.
" At 6 p.m. the cruiser returned and anchored close to,
and signalled that the commander would send his boat to
take me on board, as he wished to speak to me. On arrival
on board of the cruiser, he informed me that, owing to
information he had received, he was unable to fulfil his
promise to land me at Callao, but he had made arrange-
ments at Chatham Island for our board, etc., and that after
fourteen days a vessel would take us off for Guayaquil,
and I was to prepare to leave at 8.30 the following morning.
The commander now seemed to be working in some
mysterious way as if he were anxious to get clear of us.
He invited me to take dinner with him, but I was obliged
to refuse, owing to being so depressed to find the precarious
position that Fate had placed both my crew and myself
in, so I came back on board and called my officers together
and told them the exact words the commander of the
CH. in] LANDED ON CHATHAM ISLAND 183
LEIPZIG had said ; and when the crew were informed
they became very dissatisfied, which caused the cruiser's
people to double up the armed guard, but, however, the
night passed quietly.
44 September 21st. — At 3 a.m. both ships got under way
and proceeded towards Chatham Island, and at 7 a.m.
came to anchor in the roadstead.
"At 8 a.m. we all embarked in the cruiser's boats with
our remaining effects and small amount of provisions,
and at 9 a.m. we landed on Chatham Island, with only
two houses in sight and a large store shed, in which place
the crew were lodged. (This island belongs to Ecuador,
and is used as a convict station.)
" I arranged for two officers to remain with the crew
to keep order, and taking the chief officer, chief signaller,
and second engineer, we rode on horseback to the settle-
ment six miles inland (a sugar and coffee plantation),
and even here we fared very badly with regard to food and
beds ; but the crew fared very bad, as the provisions were
very scarce and had to be carefully rationed.
44 September 22nd. — This day passed away after many
troubles regarding sleeping accommodation, etc., but my
crew seemed to be getting very dissatisfied, though up to the
present they had borne the hardships bravely.
44 September 24£h. — To-day I made arrangements with
the Governor of the Island, a Mr. Araz, to take me and
half of the crew to Ecuador, as this was the only means of
getting into communication and reporting the loss of my
ship ; and he arranged to send us away in a small sloop
of fifty tons, the distance to Guayaquil being about 670
miles, so he provisioned her accordingly, she being about
half loaded with a cargo of dried fish and hides, and ordin-
arily would not have sailed for another ten days.
44 The commander of the LEIPZIG'S intention was to
detain me on the island as long as possible, so as to prevent
me communicating with the authorities and spoiling
his chances of sinking merchant vessels, for when the
Governor of the island offered to assist me, one of the
German officers remaining on the island strongly objected;
but the Governor insisted on our leaving owing to the
scarcity of food, there not being sufficient to keep all the
men for any length of time, and also owing to his good
feeling towards us.
184 CRUISER ATTACKS ON SHIPPING [CH. in
" So, after some considerable trouble, I picked out half
of the crew that was to accompany me on what turned
out to be one of the most monotonous and hardest five
days at sea I ever experienced. The accommodation for
the crew was in the hold, where they slept on the hides
and dried fish, and the smell at times was something
terrible.
"So at 3 p.m., after saying good-bye to the remaining
crew, we boarded our small craft, lifted anchor and
set sail for Guayaquil. I may mention that this is the
most isolated and unfrequented stretch of water in the
world.
" Mr. Araz, the Governor, accompanied us, and we occu-
pied the cabin together, and he was most kind and con-
siderate to us all right through the trip and did all possible
for our comfort.
" October 1st. — This day we arrived at Guayaquil, after
a most eventful trip in many ways ; the total number of
persons on board the small craft was twenty-nine, so our
comfort and living can be better imagined than described." l
As soon as the Elsinore had been dispatched, the
LEIPZIG again got to work, and in the Gulf of Guaya-
quil, on September 25th, she met the s.s. Bankfields
(3,763 tons ; master, Mr. John Ingham) just out of
Eten bound for a British port with a cargo of sugar
and copper ore. Rumours had already reached Callao
that a German cruiser was off the Peruvian coast,
but the warning, which was immediately issued, did not
reach Eten until some hours after the Bankfields had left,
the official telegram being delayed in transit. Thus it
happened that this fine British ship fell an easy prey
to the LEIPZIG, by whom she was forthwith sunk. The
rather unprofitable career of the LEIPZIG was next varied
by the capture of the sailing-vesselDrwrttrawr (1,844 tons),
on December 2nd, when off Staten Island near Cape Horn.
She was carrying a cargo of anthracite coal, which was
too valuable to be sunk, so she was taken to the east
side of Picton Island, about one mile from the shore.
1 The remainder of the crew of the Elsinore left Chatham Island a few
days after the departure of the master ; they were conveyed to Panama
in the s.s. Ecuador, and proceeded thence to Colon, arriving in London on
November 25th by the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company's Danube,
CH. m] BATTLE OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS 185
The coal transports Baden and Santa Isabel, which were
in attendance upon the German cruiser, were placed one
on each side of the Drummuir, and the cargo of coal was
discharged. The ship was then ransacked for food,
stores, and other things which might be of use to the
Germans, and was sunk four days after her seizure, the
master (Mr. J. C. Eagles) and crew having in the meantime
been transferred to the Norddeutscher Lloyd s.s. Seydlitz,
which was in company with the LEIPZIG. The capture
had been effected on the very eve of what was to prove
one of the most decisive events of the war by sea, for
two days after the Drummuir was sunk the battle of
the Falkland Islands occurred, the LEIPZIG sharing the
fate of all the other ships under Admiral von Spec's flag,
except the DRESDEN, which, as has already been noted,
came to her end early in the following year. The Baden
and Santa Isabel were sunk by the cruiser BRISTOL, but
the Seydlitz managed to escape, and on December
18th she arrived with British seamen at San Antonio,
Patagonia. According to the master of the Drummuir,
the loss of that vessel prevented the Germans capturing
the Falkland Islands, as the days which were occu-
pied in looting the ship gave Admiral Sturdee time to
reach the islands. " I understand," the captain declared
in a subsequent statement, " that there were men armed
ready to occupy the islands as soon as they had been taken
by the fleet, and if this is the case, the loss of the Drum-
muir was a providential act."
CHAPTER IV
THE EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN "
THE story of the raids on British shipping by the German
cruiser EMDEN still remains to be told. It is perhaps an
advantage that the experiences of merchant seamen at
the hands of other enemy vessels should have already been
described. A standard had thus been afforded by which
the ingenuity, resourcefulness, and humanity of Captain
von Miiller of the EMDEN can be measured. When brief
particulars of his exploits were first published in England,
there was a tendency to regard this German naval officer's
consideration towards the passengers and crews of cap-
tured merchant ships as quite exceptional. The legend
also grew up that the EMDEN alone among the German
ships had succeeded in carrying on commerce-destruction
with any considerable degree of success. In the light of
the fuller revelation of the operations of German men-of-
war and converted merchantmen, we are able to correct
the somewhat exaggerated estimate which was formed by
contemporary British opinion of the resource and sea-
manship of Captain von Miiller. He did better than his
compeers, but will hold no such place in the history of
this war as was accorded to Captain Semmes in the
American Civil War, and to Captain Paul Jones in the
War of Independence.
Captain von Miiller struck where he could produce the
maximum effects, political and commercial, though he
profited by an element of luck. Moreover, he, like the
officers who commanded other German men-of-war
during the period when attack was being made on British
merchant shipping by surface ships, besmirched his repu-
tation with no act contrary to the principles of the
brotherhood of the sea, or opposed to the dictates of human-
186
CH. iv] IN THE BAY OF BENGAL 187
ity. The day was to come when German naval officers
and men were to earn the contempt of other seamen
owing to the callousness and inhumanity which many of
them exhibited. During the opening phase of the war
the world welcomed many indications of an intention,
so far as naval hostilities were concerned, to fulfil the
undertakings which Germany's representatives had given
at The Hague and at London, when the rules governing
the conduct of war were discussed.
In the course of her career, the EMDEN captured and
sank fifteen merchant ships, the same number as the
KARLSRUHE : she overhauled seven other vessels, of which
one escaped, two were captured and utilised, and the other
four were released. The story of the EMDEN'S operations,
therefore, resolves itself into the narrative of the ex-
periences of the officers and men of twenty-two British
merchant ships. From the time when the cruiser, on the
eve of the war, was reported to be at Tsingtau until she
appeared dramatically in the Bay of Bengal, little or no
authentic information had reached the British Admiralty
as to her whereabouts. The war had run its course for
a period of over a month before the Indian Government
was suddenly forced to admit that it was confronted
with a situation which had not been foreseen, and against
which no adequate precautions had been taken. Re-
viewing the depredations of the EMDEN in the light of
the subsequent attack on ocean-borne commerce as
waged by the enemy, and the heavy losses inflicted, the
widespread irritation which she occasioned both in the
Eastern and Western world is notable. The first full
and authentic news of the character of the EMDEN'S
operations in the Bay of Bengal to reach England was a
message to the Morning Post of September 19th. The
Colombo correspondent of that journal related an inter-
view which he had had with a passenger in the s.s. Dip-
lomat (7,615 tons), which had sailed from that port on
the previous Friday. Squally weather had been expe-
rienced in the Bay of Bengal for some weeks before the
EMDEN appeared, and that condition contributed to the
enemy's success. " From the morning when we left the
Sand Heads and dropped our pilot until the moment when,
eighteen hours later, the EMDEN captured us by Puri,
there were intermittent rain showers, when it was impossible
188 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
to see fifty yards ahead. On the Saturday night we never
troubled to extinguish lights, so confident were we, although
we subsequently learnt that three British ships — the Indus,
Lovat, and Killin — had already been sunk. " Continuing his
narrative, this passenger stated that : " About noon on
Sunday we saw ahead a group of four vessels, in the centre
of which was a warship, which the first officer on our
bridge supposed to be British, with convoys. The manner
in which the supposed convoys were lying raised our
suspicions, however, and these were subsequently con-
firmed by the sight of the Prussian Eagle on the EMDEN'S
bows, and the shell which whistled across our bows. An
officer, late of the Hamburg- Amerika Line, who was
serving his two months' annual reserve training when war
broke out, was deputed to board us. The boat's crew
carried Mausers and side-arms. The first act was to hoist
the German flag in the Diplomat, and the next to smash
our wireless. Otherwise every courtesy was shown, and
we were allowed to take our personal effects on board the
previously- captured Kabinga, which subsequently brought
us back. The EMDEN was in a dreadfully dirty con-
dition, having been seven weeks at sea without touching
port."
Some time elapsed before it was possible to piece to-
gether the story of the EMDEN'S attack upon British
shipping in the Bay of Bengal. An account of her ex-
periences, the general accuracy of which was subsequently
confirmed, was obtained later on from the diary of a
German petty officer of the EMDEN who became a
prisoner of war. The EMDEN was ordered to prepare for
war on July 28th ; she was then lying at Tsingtau. Thirty-
six hours later, in the evening, she put to sea with all
lights out. The early days of August, when the German
cruiser was moving in Japanese waters, were comparatively
uneventful. The only variation of the monotony was the
capture of the Russian volunteer ship RiASAN,1 which,
being without guns or ammunition, became an easy prize,
and. was taken back to Tsingtau. War with England
having been declared, the EMDEN again put to sea, on the
evening of August 6th, in company with the collier Marko-
mannia, loaded with 6,000 tons of coal and 1,000 tons of
provisions. Evening was chosen as the time for departure,
1 Renamed CORMORAN and utilised. See p. 177.
CH. iv] THE FIRST CAPTURES 189
and the ships showed no lights as they crept out of the
harbour. During subsequent days the EMDEN was intent
upon avoiding the British China Squadron, and passage
was made into the Bay of Bengal by a circuitous route,
so as to cut across the network of converging trade routes.
The Indian port authorities had no suspicion of the danger
which threatened shipping, and consequently British
vessels in those waters received no special warning, and
proceeded on their voyages in a false sense of security.
Captain von Miiller was favoured in this, as in other respects.
The first vessel he met was the Greek steamer Pontoporos,
which was on her way from Calcutta to Karachi with a
cargo of Bengal coal. The ship was retained, and shortly
afterwards the British steamer Indus (3,393 tons ; master,
Mr. H. S. Smaridge) hove in sight. She had left Calcutta
on September 7th for Bombay, in ballast, and was three
days out when a man-of-war was sighted. Captain Sma-
ridge, convinced that she was of British nationality,
made no attempt to escape until it was too late, and thus
he fell an unresisting victim to the enemy, who dismantled
the wireless, transhipped several cases of soap, put the
crew on board the Markomannia, and then sank the ship,
after firing ten shots. On the following afternoon the
EMDEN had a further success in similar circumstances.
The Lovat (6,102 tons) had left Calcutta for Bombay
two days after the Indus. She had, like the Indus, been
fitted up as a transport. Late in the afternoon the man-of-
war, accompanied by two steamers, was sighted, and the
master of the Lovat (Mr. Robert Clegg) also assumed that
the stranger was British, and that the two steamers formed
part of a convoy which he should join. Unsuspectingly,
therefore, he continued on his course. As the unknown
cruiser drew in, however, the German ensign was run up,
a signal to stop was broken, and a blank shot fired across
the bows of the Lovat. Within a short time the crew had
been transferred to the Markomannia, with the exception
of six Indian firemen, who were sent to the Pontoporos,
and the Lovat was sunk by gunfire.
The EMDEN then resumed her cruise. She steamed in
the centre, with the Markomannia on one side and the
Pontoporos on the other at a considerable distance, but
within signalling range. Captain von Miiller was con-
vinced that he was in a good position for reaping a rich
190 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
harvest, and his judgment was confirmed on the following
night — September 12th — when he captured the Kabinga
(4,657 tons). This ship had left Calcutta for Colombo the
previous day, and was almost on the usual track, steering a
south-south-westerly course from the Sand Heads with lights
burning, when at 11 o'clock the EMDEN appeared. At the
time the Kabinga put to sea there was still no suspicion at
Calcutta of the EMDEN'S presence in the Bay of Bengal, so
her captain had no idea that he was running any particular
danger. Suddenly the flash of gunfire pierced the darkness
and a cruiser was observed on the port quarter, signalling
to the merchantman to stop instantly and not to use her
wireless. Shortly afterwards a boar ding- party reached
the Kabinga, her wireless installation was damaged, and
orders were given to the officers and men to leave the ship
in two hours, as it was intended to sink her. The weather
was bad at the time. The crew was forthwith mustered
in readiness to take to the boats. The boarding officer
then discovered that the captain (Mr. Thomas Robinson)
had his wife and child on board. A signal was at once
made to the EMDEN, and a reply received that the transfer
would not be made that night in consideration of the
rough sea and the hardship which the woman and child
would suffer. It was, however, anticipated that the
order to destroy the ship would be carried out on the
following morning, but in the early hours of the morning
the Glasgow steamer Killin (3,544 tons; master, Mr. J. K.
Wilson), which was on her way from Calcutta to Colombo,
loomed out of the darkness and nearly ran into the EMDEN.
She was carrying 4,980 tons of Bengal coal. At the
moment the EMDEN was well supplied with fuel, so the
Kabinga was ordered to receive the Killings crew on board,
and the latter ship was sunk.' Accompanied by her two
improvised tenders and the Kabinga, the EMDEN cruised
until noon, when the Harrison liner Diplomat (7,615 tons)
was captured on her way from Colombo to London with
a valuable consignment of tea. When she left the former
port on the evening of September 12th, the master (Mr.
R. J. Thompson) had seen an official message from Simla
in the office of the Calcutta agent of his firm to the effect
that navigation in the Bay of Bengal was reasonably
safe. Captain Thompson, like other masters, appears to
have accepted this assurance as a guarantee of security,
CH. iv] MISTAKEN FOR A BRITISH CRUISER 191
which was not the meaning it really bore. When shortly
before noon on September 13th a cruiser, followed by three
merchant ships, came in sight, he at once assumed that
the man-of-war was British and that she was bringing
in three German prizes. He was supported in this belief
by a report which had reached Calcutta before he had left.
He was more or less on the trade route when the EMDEN
appeared on the Diplomat's starboard quarter, fired a
warning shot, and at the same time hoisted the German
ensign. On the boarding-party reaching the Diplomat,
the officer in command informed the master that the
British vessel was an hour late. The crew were permitted
to collect some clothes and were then taken on board the
Kabinga, and the Diplomat was sunk. The Trabboch
(4,014 tons) was the next British ship to fall a victim to
the raider. She was proceeding in ballast from Negapatam
to Calcutta. At 6 p.m. on September 14th she came out
of a rain squall and the chief officer reported land on the
port bow, but, to his unspeakable surprise, " the land "
proved to be a cruiser in company with three other ships.
The master (Mr. W. H. Ross) of the Trabboch made the
same error as other masters in thinking that he had fallen
in with a British cruiser with prizes bound for Colombo.
When the unrecognised man-of-war was about three-
quarters of a mile distant, she fired a shot, ran up the
German ensign, made a signal to stop, and the Trabboch
was then rounded up close to the other strange ships.
In this manner another success was achieved by the
EMDEN, more by luck than judgment, and, the crew of
the merchantman having been transferred to the Kabinga,
which was already crowded, the Trabboch was sunk.
Just before this the Italian steamer Loredano had ap-
peared. Captain von Miiller asked the master, Captain
Giacopolo, to take off all the crews now assembled on board
the Kabinga, and stated that he was about to sink that
vessel. The captain of the Loredano refused to comply
with the request, pleading that he had insufficient room
on board his ship. In the circumstances, therefore, Captain
von Miiller had no alternative but to release this neutral
vessel, which proceeded on her voyage and, in fact, con-
veyed to the Indian Port authorities information of the
EMDEN'S activities, enabling them to take precautionary
measures which resulted in the saving of a considerable
14
192 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. IV
volume of tonnage from capture.1 The captain of the
EMDEN apparently realised that he could not much longer
keep his movements secret, since it was essential that the
Kabinga, with the captured crews on board, should be
sent into a neighbouring port. He doubtless regarded any
action taken by the Italian merchant officer as of little
importance. At any rate, the crews of the Indus and
Lovat, who had been on board the Markomannia, were
transferred to the Kabinga, and that ship was released to
proceed to Calcutta ; her captain 2 was warned to " take
care when approaching Sand Heads, as the lights are
out." That caution was typical of the consideration
which Captain von Muller exhibited throughout his raiding
cruise.
Just after the Kabinga had been released, the EMDEN
sighted the Clan Matheson (4,775 tons) coming up to the
eastward. When she left Madras on September 12th,
the Bay of Bengal was still believed to be fairly safe.
Captain William Harris, in an interview with Lloyd's
agent at Rangoon, subsequently gave the following details
of the circumstances in which he was captured :
" The steamer was bound from Madras to Calcutta.
On Monday, the 14th, the third officer called me and re-
ported that a steamer on the port beam had shown a red
flare. I went out on deck and saw a steamer on the port
beam, some distance away, with two masthead lights
showing clearly. There was a steamer on the port bow
with all lights showing, both at the masthead and on
deck. It was about four miles distant. Both vessels
were apparently heading the same course as ourselves.
About 11.30 I perceived some signals from a point on the
port quarter, but the midshipman on watch could not
read them, as they seemed to say 4 Do as,' repeated again
and again. At 11.40 there was a gunshot on the port
1 Captain Giacopolo, of the Loredano, made every effort to warn British
shipping of the danger, and he succeeded in stopping the City of Rangoon.
His information was passed on to other vessels, and gave sufficient warning
to prevent the Itonus, Lotusmere, and Rajput from falling into the enemy's
hands. This Italian captain's action also enabled the port officer at Cal-
cutta to withdraw the pilot vessel, to extinguish the trading lights in
channels, and to warn Akyab, Chittagong, False Point, Vizagapatam,
and Cocanada.
2 Captain Robinson and the wireless operator (Mr. A. Weselly) of the
Kabinga showed considerable enterprise and ingenuity in restoring the
wireless installation, enabling messages to be sent to Calcutta.
CH. iv] THE "CLAN MATHESON'S " FATE 193
quarter, apparently aimed at the steamer. A few minutes
later a second shot came from the same position. I rang
' Stand by,' and after another short interval a third gun
was fired, the shot passing across the steamer's bows.
A few minutes later a large three-funnelled cruiser ranged
up alongside with all lights out, signalling by Morse, 4 Stop
at once ; do not use wireless ; I will send a boat.' An
armed boat with three lieutenants and some fifteen or
twenty men came alongside, but not until that moment
did we realise that the vessel was a German cruiser. The
senior officer inspected the ship's papers and signalled to
the warship, thereafter announcing to me that the crew
would be transferred to a German transport immediately
and the ship sunk. I was informed that the crew would be
allowed to take part of their effects, personal property
only. The whole of the steamer's crew, with such of
their effects as they wanted most, were then transferred
to the s.s. Markomannia in the boats of the EMDEN. This
was at 2 a.m. on September 15th. In the meantime
dynamite charges were placed in several positions in the
steamer's hold, and these were fired, and the ship not
sinking sufficiently quickly for the Germans' purposes,
the vessel was fired upon by the cruiser four times, their
searchlight playing upon her meanwhile. Thereafter the
steamer sank by the head, and finally, at 2.35 a.m., all
lights went out and the vessel disappeared.
"At 4 p.m. on September 17th steamer's smoke was
sighted on the eastern horizon, and the course was altered
to cut her off. At 6 p.m. the cruiser stopped the Nor-
wegian s.s. Dovre, and signalled the Markomannia to
ship the Clan Mathesori's crew, which work was started
at 7.15 and finished at 8 p.m. The whole seventy men
were carried in the EMDEN'S boats. The Dovre arrived
at Rangoon on the morning of September 19th."
On September 15th the EMDEN still continued her north-
ward cruise, steaming to within forty miles of Calcutta.
She then turned south-east in the direction of Rangoon.
By this time the captain of the EMDEN appears to have
conjectured that he might be interrupted by British
cruisers. He determined, however, to carry out a dramatic
coup intended to produce psychological effects along the
Indian coast. At the entrance to Madras Harbour there
194 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
were a number of oil-tanks ; Captain von Miiller decided
to fire into them. At 9.30 on the evening of September
22nd, the cruiser therefore crept in towards the harbour,
and, playing her searchlights on the tanks, fired some
preliminary shots in order to get the range. The search-
lights were then turned off, leaving the cruiser in darkness,
and the EMDEN poured in a series of broadsides, altogether
125 shells. Within a short time the harbour was lighted
up by the fierce flames of the burning oil. The British
s.s. Chupra was among the vessels in harbour which
suffered damage by gunfire. Her dramatic purpose
achieved, the German cruiser then steamed away at full
speed in a north-easterly direction, the forts on shore
opening fire without effect. The intention of Captain
von Miiller was to suggest that he was proceeding
towards Calcutta, but when well out of touch with land
he turned south, sailing round the east coast of Ceylon.
At the same time the Pontoporos was sent away to a
rendezvous. Good fortune again attended his cruise, for
the EMDEN encountered the King Lud (3,650 tons), on
passage from Alexandria for Calcutta. The ship was on
time charter, and, at Perim, Lloyd's signal-station signalled
that the King Lud was to proceed as fast as possible to
Calcutta, in order to reach that port on September 30th.
Captain David Harris subsequently stated that he under-
stood that "the road was reasonably safe." He met
with no incident until he arrived off Point de Galle, Ceylon,
when the EMDEN hove in sight, flying no flag, and ordered
the British merchant ship to stop. The usual routine
was followed, the King Lud being sunk after the removal
of her officers and men to the German tender Marko-
mannia, where, according to Captain Harris, " we were all
well treated."
Off Colombo the following day (September 25th) the
EMDEN saw the British steamer Tymeric (3,314 tons) just
coming out of harbour and followed her to about forty
miles west. The Tymeric was carrying a cargo of sugar
from Java to England, with orders to call at Falmouth
for orders. The master (Mr. T. T. Tulloch) was taken
by surprise, as he had not anticipated trouble. He was
continuing his course to Minikoi when, shortly before
midnight, he saw a vessel, showing no lights, coming up
on the port quarter, only two or three miles distant. The
CH. iv] THE " GRYFEVALE'S " ADVENTURE 195
stranger, which proved to be the German cruiser, drew
in and then sent the familiar signal. An armed party from
the EMDEN afterwards took possession of the merchant-
man, and Captain Tulloch was instructed to follow the
EMDEN. This he refused to do, saying that his captors
must navigate the ship themselves. An exchange of
signals took place. The captain of the EMDEN decided
to sink the Tymeric as soon as the officers and men had been
removed to the Markomannia, the captain himself being
taken on board the EMDEN, from whose quarter-deck
he watched his ship settle down. On the following day
the German cruiser met the Gryfevale (4,424 tons), which
was proceeding from Bombay to Colombo in ballast. The
Gryjevale had been detained in Bombay owing to reports
of the presence of an enemy cruiser in the Bay of Bengal ;
on September 22nd, however, clearance was given as far
as Colombo. The ship, therefore, put to sea on the 23rd ;
a good lookout was kept, and no lights were shown at night.
At midday on the 26th, when about thirty-five miles to
the south-east of Cape Comorin, a man-of-war was sighted,
and an hour later a signal to stop was received. In
these circumstances the EMDEN made another capture.
Captain Steel was told that he might either follow
the cruiser or have his ship sunk. He accepted the former
alternative.
" We steamed out to the westward until 1 a.m.," he
stated in a subsequent report to his owners, " when lights
were sighted, and shortly afterwards the Admiralty- char-
tered collier Buresk was stopped.1 This was a valuable
prize for the Germans. The crew, with the exception of
the captain, chief officer, chief and second engineers, steward
and cook, were sent on board us, and at the same time
the prisoners from the Markomannia were sent on board ;
they consisted of the crew of the King Lud (sunk on the
25th off Galle, Ceylon) and part of the crew of the Tymeric
(sunk outside Colombo at midnight on the 25th), third
officer, fourth engineer, and carpenter ; the captain and
chief engineer were prisoners on board the EMDEN, and the
1 The Buresk (4,337 tons) was on passage from Barry to Hong Kong with
coal. She was utilised by the captain of the EMDEN during the remainder
of his cruise, and was eventually sunk on November 9th, 1914, off North
Keeling Island, Cocos Islands, when the Australian cruiser SYDNEY defeated
and sank the EMDEN. Such of the officers and men as had not already
been landed by the Germans were rescued by the SYDNEY.
196 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
Chinese crew were transferred to the Buresk. It appears
that the captain and chief engineer of the Tymeric had
refused to follow the EMDEN ; they were given ten minutes
to get their boats out and leave the ship ; the ship was sunk
at once. In all other cases where the crews made no
trouble, but submitted to the orders given, the crews were
allowed from one to three hours to pack up their effects
and leave the ship. About 4 a.m. we steamed out to the
westward, the Buresk accompanying us. Shortly after
daylight the Ribera l in ballast was stopped, the crew
transferred to us, and the ship sunk by shell fire. The
course was again set to the westward, it evidently being
the intention to get us as far as possible from Colombo
before releasing us. Before dark another vessel, which
proved to be the Foyle,* from Malta to Rangoon, light,
was stopped, the crew transhipped to us, and the vessel
sunk. At 10 o'clock — much to my relief, you may be sure
— I was told that we were free to resume our voyage. I
wish here to say that I appreciate very much the courtesy
shown to us by the officer in charge of the prize crew, and
also the good behaviour of the men ; they one and all
performed their duties with every consideration for every-
one on board."
Interesting sidelights on the proceedings of the EMDEN
in her attacks upon commerce were afterwards furnished
by a diary which was kept by the master of the Buresk
(Mr. F. G. Taylor), in which he recounted his remarkable
experiences during the period when he was compelled to
accompany the EMDEN :
" September 27th. — 1 a.m. stopped by German cruiser
EMDEN ; officers came aboard and told crew to go on board
Gryfevale. 2 a.m. proceeded full speed after EMDEN ;
9 a.m. sank Ribera, proceeded west towards Minikoi.
1 The Ribera (3,500 tons; master, Mr. John Isdale) was proceeding in
ballast from Glasgow to Batavia when she encountered the EMDEN, north-
west of Colombo.
2 The Foyle (4,147 tons) was on passage from Dunstan-on-Tyne to
Colombo and Rangoon in water ballast. According to Captain W. H.
Gibson, he was informed at the Admiral Superintendent's office at Malta
that " the eastern route was all clear," and, calling at Port Said, he received
no instructions, and sailed on September llth "with every confidence
that the route was clear, having received no information to the contrary."
The normal conditions in the Arabian Sea contributed to a false sense of
safety.
en. iv] FOLLOWING THE " EMDEN " 197
9 p.m. sank Foyle ; 10 p.m. released Gryjevale ; EMDEN
proceeded south full speed, Buresk and Markomannia
following.
" September 28th. — Proceeding south full speed.
44 September 29th. — Arrived off group Maldive Islands ;
9 a.m. EMDEN took coal from Markomannia ; 9 p.m.
stopped coaling and proceeded south.
44 September 30th. — Stopped off Maldive group ; Marko-
mannia came alongside Buresk with engine-oil and water
for boilers ; 1 p.m. Markomannia went alongside EMDEN
to coal; 9 p.m. Markomannia left EMDEN and proceeded
east ; EMDEN proceeded south.
"October 1st. — Steaming south to Australian route.
"October 2nd. — Steaming south; EMDEN receiving wire-
less that trade route from Aden to Colombo was clear for
commerce.
" October 3rd. — EMDEN steering on route from Aden to
Cape Lemvin, south of Chagos Islands.
44 October 4>th. — Steaming on route, having big gun
practice in the afternoon.
44 October 5th. — Steaming slow all day on trade route,
first north-west and then south-west, having rifle
practice, etc. ; also in wireless communication with
KONIGSBERG.
" October 6th. — Steaming zigzag on trade route.
" October 7th. — Steaming zigzag on trade route, having
target practice with big guns ; shooting good and quick.
" October 8th. — Still cruising on trade route.
" October 9th. — Arrived in Diego Garcia at 7 a.m. ;
anchored ; EMDEN scrubbed bottom and painted boot
topping with paint taken from Buresk ; at 2 p.m. finished
painting, came alongside Buresk and took coal on board ;
10 p.m. stopped coaling for the night.
" October 10th. — Coaling continued ; noon, completed
coaling, 1,300 tons coal on board ; hove up anchors and
proceeded north full speed.
"October llth. — Proceeding north full speed, fresh wind
and rain.
" October 12th. — Steering north full speed, crossed the line
6 p.m. Heavy rain and strong winds.
" October 13th. — Similar conditions, still steaming
north.
" October 14>th, — Steaming for the north group of the
198 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
Maldives to coal ; received wireless that HAMPSHIRE was 500
miles off, also cruisers DUKE OF EDINBURGH, CHATHAM,
WEYMOUTH were searching for them but knew their
positions ; also got wireless that Antwerp had fallen and
Russians driven back to Warsaw.
" October 15th. — Arrived in the north group of Maldives
to coal at 8 a.m. ; left at 4 p.m. and steered for Minikoi
Light.
" October 16th. — Captured at 1 a.m. the Clan Grant 1 and
dredger Ponrabbel? also Benmohr * at 10 a.m. All sunk
same day.
" October 17th. — Cruising round Minikoi Light.
" October ISth. — Noon, received wireless that steamers
were steering sixty miles north of track ; EMDEN proceeded
north and captured Troilus 4 at 3 p.m., and St. Egbert at
9 p.m.
" October 19th. — 1 a.m. captured Eccford ; sank Troilus
and Chilkana 8 at 4 p.m . ; released St. Egbert at 6 p.m."
Another first-hand story of the EMDEN is that of Mr.
Somers Ellis, who was one of the seven passengers on
1 The Clan Grant (3,948 tons; master, Mr. N. Leslie) was on the track
Minikoi to Colombo when captured, shortly after midnight on October 16th.
She was proceeding from Glasgow to Liverpool to Colombo with a general
cargo.
2 The dredger Ponrdbbel (473 tons; master, Mr. E. G. Gare) left Barry
Dock on August 23rd, and was captured when eighteen miles north-west
of Minikoi Lighthouse.
3 The Benmohr (4,806 tons) left Leith on September 4th for Yokohama.
The EMDEN, showing no lights, was indistinguishable in the darkness,
when the British vessel was hailed. It was not until the boarding-party
had examined the ship's papers and asked a number of questions in
perfect English that the identity of the raider was revealed. Captain J. B.
Sarchet, in reporting his experiences, subsequently stated : " I steered the
usual track from Suez to Guardafui. From there I shaped my course to
pass about thirty-five miles north of Minikoi. I inquired at the British
Consul, Port Said, if they had any instructions to give me ; they told me
' No,' but I was to signal at Perim or Aden for instructions. I stopped at
Perim in the afternoon and signalled, asking if they had any instructions
to give ; their reply was ' No.' I then asked if there was any war news ;
they also replied ' No.' My intention was to ask at Colombo or Point de
Galle for instructions. In all previous voyages I have always shaped my
course, after passing Guardafui, to pass five miles south of Minikoi. I
calculate I was about forty miles to the north of my usual track when the
Benmohr was captured."
4 The Troilus (7,562 tons) cleared Colombo on October 17th for London
with a general cargo. The master affirmed that he was carrying out the
instructions received from the Intelligence Officer at Colombo when he
met the EMDEN.
6 The Chilkana (3,244 tons; master, Mr. L. N. Archdeacon) was making
for Calcutta when she encountered the EMDEN off Minikoi and was sunk.
CH. iv] A PASSENGER'S STORY 199
board the Troilus, and was accompanied by his wife.
According to Mr. Ellis :
" Captain Long called on the Naval Intelligence Officer
twice while at Colombo — the last time just before leaving
— and was told that the route to Aden was clear and safe,
but that, as an additional precaution, it would be well
for him to go about forty miles north of the usual track
by Minikoi, first passing near Cape Comorin, and then
setting a course parallel to the regular route. Captain
Long carried out these instructions exactly, and informed
me on Sunday morning that he had sighted the light on
Cape Comorin during the night, and was then about forty
miles north of the direct track from Colombo to Minikoi.
" Sunday, the 18th instant, was a brilliantly clear day after
rain at early morning. At about 2 p.m. Captain Long
said to me that a suspicious-looking vessel was approaching
from the south ; and after a short time we were able to
identify it as a German cruiser of the EMDEN type. A
little behind her was a merchant vessel, afterwards found
to be the British coal transport steamer Buresk. The
EMDEN rapidly came on, in a direction calculated to cut
us off (an officer afterwards told me that they were steam-
ing at 19 knots), and when between one and two miles
away hoisted signal flags, which we could not at once
identify. We were afterwards told that they signified
' Don't use your wireless,' and then ' Stop.' The EMDEN
then fired a blank shot, and the engines of the Troilus
were promptly stopped, at about 2.40 p.m. When about
a quarter of a mile away, the EMDEN lowered a boat and we
were boarded by a lieutenant, a petty officer, and (I think)
twelve men, including artificers, who took charge of the
engine-room. I did not hear the instructions given, but
a commencement was at once made to swing out six boats
and lower them to the level of the upper deck, where they
were left hanging from the davits and lashed to prevent
swinging. This operation was carried out smartly and
well. We passengers were told to prepare all our private
effects for transhipment to another vessel. Towards
evening the German officer in command told us that the
captured collier in attendance on the EMDEN had already
several crews on board, and that the accommodation was
very poor, so that we might remain on the Troilus that night.
200 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. IT
He said that they expected another vessel that evening
with better accommodation, and that we should probably
be moved to her in the morning. This officer, a Naval
Reserve lieutenant, Lauterbach by name, had been for
some years in command of Hamburg- Amerika coasting
steamers running between Shanghai and Tientsin, and knew
both Captain Long (of the s.s. Troilus) and myself by name.
" They obviously expected the Troilus, and as obviously
knew the course we (and other ships) were likely to take
if not on the direct run to Minikoi.
" Immediately the boarding-party had taken charge,
the head of the Troilus was turned round to a little south
of east, and we proceeded at half speed for nearly six hours
(say from 2.50 to 8.50 p.m.) in nearly the same direction in
company with the EMDEN and Buresk. At about 8.30 p.m.
a light was seen on the horizon to eastward, and the
Troilus and Buresk were shortly afterwards stopped (we
had all lights out), while the EMDEN went forward and
captured the expected vessel, the St. Egbert, bound (last)
from Colombo for Aden and New York. We all then went
about south-south-east, slow, and at about 1 a.m. next
morning the British collier Exford,1 outward bound with 6,000
tons Welsh coal, was captured. . . .
" At 6 a.m. on the 19th we commenced to load the boats
with baggage, and at about 7 a.m. we transferred therein
to the St. Egbert, and met with the most kind attention
from her commander, Captain Barr.
" The sea was smooth, with a south-east swell, and a gang-
way was lowered on both boats for my wife's use. Previous
to our leaving the Troilus, twelve Chinese firemen and a
Chinese steward were sent to the Buresk by the German
officer's orders, and twelve other firemen were afterwards
sent to the Exford. These men were promised the same
pay as before.
" At about 7.30 a.m. smoke was seen on the horizon,
and the EMDEN went away to welcome the British India
boat Chilkana, a new ship of 6,000 tons,8 outward bound.
" We soon afterwards received her captain, twelve
1 The Exford (4,542 tons ; master, Mr. W. C. Donovan) was on passage
from Cardiff to Hong Kong under Admiralty sealed orders. The vessel
was presumably expected by the enemy; at any rate, her commander
was greeted by name by the EMDEN'S officer who boarded her.
2 The s.s. Chilkana (3,244 gross tons) was sunk by gun-fire, 110 miles
E.N.E. from Minikoi.
CH. iv] "ST. EGBERT' RELEASED 201
passengers (all company's employees) and crew on the
St. Egbert, and afterwards the captains and crews of the
Buresk and of the Benmohr, Clan Grant, and a Tasmanian
dredger, all of whom were on the Buresk.
" At 10.40 a.m. (on the 19th) the EMDEN fired three
shells at the water-line of the Troilus, all forward (I think)
of the bridge. She sank very slowly, and at 1.30 the
EMDEN fired another shell or two forward, and one aft ;
all shots were on the port side. At 2.40 p.m. the Troilus
sank, after listing heavily and then rolling over to her port
side and diving stem first. It was a most distressing
sight. The B.I. steamer Chilkana was sunk (in half an
hour after being fired on) just before sunset. At about
7 p.m. the captain of the St. Egbert was told to set a course
for the Indian Ocean between Calicut and Tuticorin,
and we reached Cochin at 6 p.m. on the 20th instant. The
Buresk and Exford were kept with the EMDEN, each having
about 6,000 tons of coal on board. The St. Egbert was
spared owing to her cargo being for the U.S.A." Mr. Ellis
added that : " We have met with the utmost kindness
and consideration from all concerned, including the officers
of the EMDEN."
The experience of the St. Egbert (5,596 tons), mentioned
in Mr. Ellis' s statement, was exceptional. The ship had
a neutral cargo for American consignees, and was on her
passage from Yokohama to New York. She left the former
port on July 18th, and therefore before the declaration of
war, and, calling at Colombo, sailed thence on October 17th.
Captain Barr learnt at Colombo that the route was
reasonably safe, and was advised to keep close to Cape
Comorin, and from thence to shape a course to pass forty
miles north of Minikoi Island. The St. Egbert steered the
course recommended, but at 9.30 p.m. on the following
day the EMDEN stopped and boarded her. In the course
of conversation with Captain Barr, the lieutenant who was
in charge of the prize crew stated that the Germans had
learnt of his departure from Colombo on the previous
day, and were aware that he had received orders " to
proceed on a more northerly track than usual," adding
that he had been informed that the British cruiser
HAMPSHIRE had arrived at Colombo that morning, and
202 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH.-IT
that her crew were ashore playing football. This em-
broidery, as in so many similar instances, was probably
mere bluff. The next morning the EMDEN rounded up
the captured vessels, and all the passengers and crews
of the steamers Benmohr, Clan Grant, Buresk, Troilus,
Exford, Chilkana, and Ponrabbel, were sent on board the
St. Egbert, which was released on October 19th with orders
to proceed to Aden. In view of the large number of
persons on board and consequent restricted accommodation
and food-supplies, Captain Barr was subsequently per-
mitted to make for Cochin, where he arrived on the
morning of October 20th.
The month of October was drawing to its close, and the
captain of the EMDEN suspected that news of his captures
must have become known on shore, and suitable measures
taken by the British naval authorities to arrest his career
of destruction. He determined to pay a visit to Penang
and see what mischief he could do there. The EMDEN,
as on the occasion of the Madras raid, erected a dummy
funnel made of canvas, in the hope that she might be
mistaken for one of the British cruisers which Captain von
Miiller thought to be in the vicinity of Penang. It is
beyond the scope of this book to describe in detail the
torpedoing of the Russian cruiser ZHEMCHUG, which was
lying in the harbour. The EMDEN, having completed that
task, turned and steamed out of the harbour at full speed.
Outside she encountered the Glenturret (4,696 tons), which
had left London on September 23rd for Yokohama, calling
at Penang, Singapore, and Hong Kong. She was loaded
with Government munitions and explosives, and would
have proved a valuable capture for the Germans. On
the night of October 26th, when in the neighbourhood of
Sabang, the Glenturret sent a wireless signal that she
would arrive at Penang on October 28th, and asking that
a lighter should be provided to take off twenty tons of
explosives. Arriving off the entrance to Penang Harbour
in the early hours of the morning of the 27th, the Glen-
turret stopped, the master (Mr. H. Jones) deciding to wait
until daylight before entering. She was on her way into
the harbour later in the morning, with the B flag (ex-
plosives) flying, when the EMDEN ranged alongside her,
being only about thirty feet distant. Captain Jones
was hailed in English and asked his reasons for flying the
THE WHITE STAB LINER "OLYMPIC" (FROM THE AIR).
202]
CH. ivj CRUISER VERSUS DESTROYER 203
B flag. He replied that the Glenturret was carrying
paraffin. The EMDEN then lowered a boat for the pur-
pose of boarding her, when the French destroyer MOUS-
QUET, which had been in Penang Harbour, appeared. In
the circumstances the captain of the EMDEN had no further
interest in the Glenturret, but immediately made off to
ascertain the identity of the strange destroyer on the
horizon. Captain von Miiller did not know what to make
of the intruder, for at 6,000 yards the strange man-of-
war appeared much larger than she really was, owing to
the mirage of the early morning. As the EMDEN closed
in to about 4,800 yards, she was recognised as the French
torpedo-boat destroyer MOUSQUET. The subsequent fight
was an unequal one. As the destroyer sank, the EMDEN
rescued the crew, numbering in all thirty-six, three of
whom afterwards died in the EMDEN owing to the severity
of their wounds. The EMDEN had lost much time in deal-
ing with the MOUSQUET, and now saw a torpedo-boat ap-
proaching her from Penang, so she at once steamed for
the Indian Ocean at full speed with the torpedo-boat in
chase. After being pursued for four hours, she lost sight
of the torpedo-boat in heavy rain, and was free to proceed
to her collier.
In the meantime the Glenturret had made her escape,
but on the following day the EMDEN came across the
s.s. Newburn (3,554 tons; master, Mr. J. R. Matthews), on
passage from the Tyne to Singapore and Samarang. She
was carrying a neutral cargo, so the captain of the EMDEN
decided to release her. Before doing so, however, he put
the survivors of the MOUSQUET on board, and the Newburn
reached Penang on October 31st.
The cruise of the EMDEN was now nearing its close.
Captain von Miiller, suspecting that a hue and cry had
been raised, decided that he would do well to change the
scene of his activities. With the idea of cutting the cable,
he steamed for Cocos Islands, which were reached on Sun-
day evening, November 8th. The German cruiser sailed
round the islands in order to see that everything was
clear, and then proceeded towards Direction Island, the
dummy funnel being again in place, and landed a party
of fifty men with instructions to destroy the wireless
station and cut the cable. In the meantime, the wireless
station had sent out an urgent message for help ; it was
204 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
picked up by the Allied men-of-war on convoy duty with
the First Australian Contingent. On instructions from
the senior officer, H.M.A.S. SYDNEY raised steam for full
speed and proceeded to Direction Island. The story
of the destruction of the EMDEN does not come within
the scope of this history : it is sufficient to add that the
German cruiser's career was brought to an end, the men
on board the Buresk being rescued. When Captain Glossop
reached this ship, he found that she was sinking, as the
Kingston had been " knocked out and damaged to prevent
repairing."
The story of the first phase of the attack on British
commerce would be incomplete were no reference made
to the circumstances in which the gunboat GEIER captured
the s.s. Southport (3,588 tons). The adventurous story,
which afterwards moved the Admiralty to express their
approbation of the action of Captain A. Clopet and the
officers and men, cannot be better told than in the form
of a paraphrase of the narrative as related by the first-
named.
The s.s. Southport left Auckland, New Zealand, on
June 12th, to load a cargo of phosphates for the Pacific
Phosphate Company at Nauru, calling at Ocean Island
for orders. The voyage was uneventful. Off Nauru,
information was sent by the manager of the Phosphate
Company that loading had been delayed, owing to dan-
gerous weather, strong currents, and the exposed position
of the island, and that, in consequence of tonnage
having precedence over the Southport, that vessel need
not present herself for loading for some time. Captain
Clopet decided to follow the example of other captains
placed in similar circumstances, and wait at Tarawa
(Gilbert Islands), where further orders could be conveyed
to him, in preference to steaming round the island against
the strong prevailing easterly current. The Southport
returned to Nauru on July 28th. The captain found that
only some 450 tons of phosphates had been loaded, and
there was still a balance of 13,000 tons to be shipped before
the Southport would be required. In order to save coal,
he decided to bear up for Kusaie, the most easterly island
in the Caroline group (German), where the conditions
appeared to be better than at Taraiva. It was also
arranged that the manager at Nauru should forward loading
CH. iv] CAPTURE OF THE " SOUTHPORT " 205
orders by the steamer Germania, due at Kusaie on August
28th. The Southport arrived at Kusaie on August 4th,
and remained there awaiting instructions. The non-arrival
of the Germania on the stipulated date caused surprise,
owing to the regularity of her previous voyages. No
news being forthcoming, it was decided to sail for Nauru
on September 6th. On the 4th, the captain being ashore
at the time, the German gunboat GEIER and the transport
Tsintau, of Bremen, came to anchor in the harbour, and
a boat full of armed officers and sailors put off from the
GEIER and boarded the British ship. Captain Clopet, on
returning on board his ship shortly afterwards, was in-
formed by the German officers that, " war having been
declared by England on Germany," they demanded that
all the ship's papers, register, ship's articles, load-line,
etc., be handed over. It was explained that the ship
was chartered to load phosphates at Nauru for Stettin.
The engineers of the warship then came on board and
began disabling the vessel, principally by removing the
four eccentrics of the L.P. and H.P. engines and other
connected parts, as well as the intermediate stop valve.
The following day the transport Tsintau proceeded along-
side and started transhipping the Southport's coal into
her bunkers, the work continuing until 6 a.m. on
August 7th (Monday). The same day at 10 a.m. a boat
full of armed officers and men boarded the Southport and
came on the lower bridge, when a formal act of seizure
was read over to the captain by the officer in charge,
appropriating the vessel to the Imperial German Govern-
ment. The armed sailors were lined up on one side of
the lower bridge, and, the British ensign having been
previously hauled down, the German naval ensign was
hoisted on 1^ie flagstaff, the German officers and sailors
saluting theiteflag. Everything was done in the most
formal manner, as though the scene were being enacted
on the stage before an appreciative audience. Captain
Clopet was subsequently informed that he would remain
in charge of the ship and responsible for it, as well as for
the discipline of the crew, pending any future action on
the part of the German Government. It should be men-
tioned that the commander of the GEIER at first decided
to sink the Southport. He learnt afterwards that, owing
to the non-arrival of the Germania with provisions, the
206 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
Southport was exceedingly short of food, and he was told
that the crew would be faced with starvation unless the
situation was relieved. The German officer was not un-
sympathetic, but urged that he could not send provisions,
having himself an insufficient supply. Ultimately he did
in fact send four loaves of bread, which were accepted.
But his more effective aid took the form of an order on
the King of Kusaie, in the name of the Imperial German
Government, to supply the ship with such food as the
island produced.
The GEIER and Tsintau left on the afternoon of the 7th,
the Germans apparently satisfied that the Southport could
not move ; they disappeared in a south-easterly direction.
After their departure, the captain consulted the chief
engineer (Mr. J. C. Dodd) as to the possibility of repairing the
engines in such a manner as to enable the Southport to put to
sea. Mr. Dodd, nothing daunted by the damage which had
been done, decided that the position was not hopeless. His
confidence was justified. The work of repair was carried
on from day to day until September 15th, when Captain
Clopet had the satisfaction of learning that the engines
were ready. Steam was raised and orders were given for
a trial that night. The trial began shortly after midnight,
the captain being present in the engine-room in order to
judge the reliability of the engines. After two attempts
the engines started. They were stopped after a few
revolutions, the chief engineer stating that he was confident
that everything was as satisfactory as could be expected.
A statement was handed to the captain in confirmation
of this opinion. The following evening, Captain Clopet
called the officers and engineers of the ship to the cabin,
and then told them that he intended to make an attempt
to recapture the steamer and take her into Australian
waters, Brisbane being the nearest port. As an alternative,
it was suggested that the vessel might remain in Kusaie
until the end of hostilities, when in all probability an ex-
change of vessels would take place between England and
Germany. Captain Clopet pointed out, however, that the
value represented by the Southport was at stake, and that
at that moment, to all intents and purposes, the ship
was the property of the German Government ; if the
attempt to bring the vessel to a safe Australian port was
successful, the money represented in the ship would revert
CH. iv] A BOLD STROKE 207
to the original flag. The captain's decision was unani-
mously accepted by the officers present, and on the following
morning the crew gave their support. In anticipation of
the voyage, since there was a shortage of provisions, the
captain obtained from the shore some 400 pounds of roots,
which are used by the natives only when on the verge of
starvation, besides about 350 cocoanuts, the latter being
provided by the King of Kusaie, who was by this time
aware that an attempt to escape was to be made. Though
other provisions were taken on board as a precautionary
measure, the voyage was begun on straitened rations.
A word may be added as to the manner in which the
engines were repaired. The German engineers had left
the two eccentric rods for the L.P. engines ; one of these
was put on the ahead sheave of the H.P. engine, the other
rod being kept in place on the ahead sheave of the L.P.
engine. Thus the engineers were able to work the engines
subject to the disadvantage that they could move only
in one direction, i.e., ahead ; it was impossible to reverse
the engines, however great the need. There was also some
difficulty in restarting the engines once they were stopped.
These circumstances rendered the task of handling the
ship difficult. The attempt to move the Southport was
made early on the morning of September 8th. The
harbour of Kusaie is very small, having on one side land
and on the other a coral reef. It provided barely sufficient
room for the steamer to swing, and at the time of
starting, Captain Clopet swung her stem towards the
entrance, the channel having been buoyed by his orders
previous to heaving up the anchor. With the assistance
of warps, the steamer's stern was brought into the wind,
the anchor hove barely clear of the bottom, and her head
started to pay off with the wind towards the entrance.
When nearly square in the channel, the telegraph was rung
" Full ahead," and the last rope was let go as soon as the
engines started.
The voyage was uneventful; lights were carefully screened
up to 9 p.m., when they were put out. The steamer
passed to the westward of San Christoval (Solomon Islands)
on September 23rd, and arrived to the north-east of Sandy
Cape on September 28th — when, in reply to inquiries,
the s.s. Westminster reported the coast clear of enemy
ships. A course was then shaped towards Brisbane.
15
208 EXPLOITS OF THE " EMDEN " [CH. iv
On the same day the Southport observed the Dutch steamer
Tasman, of Batavia, altering her course towards the coast,
and shortly afterwards a steamer ashore at right angles
to the beach was observed. The Southport also turned
towards the steamer, which was flying the International
Distress Signal N.C. (" Want immediate assistance ").
The vessel was the s.s. Marlvo. As the first impression
conveyed by the steamer's position was that she must
have gone ashore during the night, the captain of the
Southport decided to come to anchor in a position to render
help. It was a characteristic act on the part of a British
seaman who had so recently been himself in trouble.
The Southport drew in between the Tasman and the
stranded vessel. Assistance had unfortunately come too
late, for the Marlvo already had her after compartments
full of water, through striking some obstruction off Sandy
Cape. Her passengers were transferred to the Tasman,
and the Southport proceeded on her voyage to Brisbane.
She completed the passage without further incident. In
these circumstances the GEIER was deprived of the only
prize which she made during her career as a commerce-
destroyer.
Though the enemy's attack on merchant shipping in
the early days of the war was conducted on a much smaller
scale than had been anticipated by many students of
German naval policy in pre-war days, the measure of
success which was attained made a deep impression on
the public mind unaccustomed to the vicissitudes of naval
warfare. The injury inflicted was, however, slight when
studied in relation to the experiences of British shipping
during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, the
varied resources of the German Navy, or the size of the
target offered by the British Mercantile Marine, comprising
44*4 per cent, of sea-going steam- vessels of the world,
or 47* 9 per cent, if the tonnage of the Dominions be in-
cluded. At the end of the first quarter of 1915 the volume
of British tonnage which had been lost through the
agency of enemy vessels and mines since the opening
of the war was only 232,824 gross tons,1 a very small
percentage of the tonnage afloat. Seventy-two vessels 8
1 Merchant Shipping (Losses), 199.
2 Excluding the small sailing-vessels Frau Minna Petersen (captured
by a torpedo-boat on August 7th) and Ayesha (captured November 9th).
CH. iv] RESULT OF THE CRUISER RAIDS 209
were captured by enemy cruisers and armed merchantmen,
including the Glenturret, which was not actually boarded,
and the Southport, which escaped. The depredations were
inflicted upon the Merchant Navy without the sacrifice of
a single life. More than that, officers and men of the
German ships, whether men-of-war or auxiliary cruisers,
exhibited a high respect for the dictates of humanity, and
showed to passengers and crews a consideration and a
courtesy which, in view of later events, deserve to be
recorded.
Name of Vessel.
Sunk.
Released.
Escaped.
Utilised.
TOTAL.
Remarks.
EMDEN
151
4
1
22
22
1 The total ex-
eludes the
small sailing-
vessel Ayesha,
captured by
the EMDEN'S
landing-party.
2 TheExford was
recaptured.
KONIGSBERQ .
1
—
—
—
1
GETER .
—
1
—
1
KARLSRUHE .
15 1
1
—
1
17
i The/rcdramwas
utilised and
subsequently
KRONPRINZ WIL-
sunk.
HELM
91
1
—
—
10
1 The Potara was
utilised and
subsequently
PRINZ EITEL
5
—
—
—
5
sunk.
DRESDEN
4
5
—
—
9
LEIPZIG
3
—
—
—
3
KAISER WILHELM .
2
2
—
—
4
54
13
2
3
72
CHAPTER V
THE PROTECTION OF MERCHANT SHIPPING
THE opening phase of the war by sea was marked by
an attack by German cruisers and armed merchant ships
upon British shipping. The effects of that campaign
have already been described. It would be unfair to leave
the records of the sinkings of British merchant tonnage
during these early days without some reference to the steps
taken by the Admiralty and other departments to afford
protection to the Mercantile Marine. Strategical and tacti-
cal considerations are dealt with elsewhere,1 but it is
appropriate to an account of the part taken by the Mer-
chant Navy in the war to examine the bases of national
policy as determined before the outbreak of hostilities.
I. STRATEGIC POLICY
Time and again the subject of the relation of the Royal
and Merchant Navies was considered, either directly or
indirectly, by Royal Commissions and Select Committees.
In particular, the responsibility of the Navy for the security
of British ocean-borne commerce came under examination
by the Royal Commission on the Supply of Food and Raw
Material in Time of War, which was appointed on April 27th,
1903. The trading community was largely represented,
and among the members were Vice- Admiral — afterwards
Admiral — Sir Gerard H. U. Noel (who was succeeded
in January 1904 by Admiral Sir Day Hort Bosanquet)
and Sir John C. R. Colomb, M.P., who had devoted great
attention to the matters with which the Commission
was instructed to deal. The Commissioners were in con-
stant communication with the Admiralty, and examined
a number of naval officers of standing, including Captain
1 Cf. Naval Operations, by Sir Julian Corbett.
210
CH. v] A MEMORABLE REPORT 211
Prince Louis of Battenberg— later Admiral the Marquis
of Milford Haven — who was then Director of Naval In-
telligence, Admiral Sir John O. Hopkins, who had held
the command of the Mediterranean Fleet, and Admiral
Sir Cyprian A. G. Bridge, a former Director of Naval
Intelligence, who was in command of His Majesty's ships
in the China Seas at the time of the outbreak of war
between Russia and Japan.
The Report of the Commission was issued in 1905, and
it is of interest in that it provides evidence of the attention
which was then being given by the naval authorities to
the protection of the Mercantile Marine. The Commission
was appointed to inquire into the supplies of food and raw
material in time of war and, inter alia, " to advise whether
it is desirable to adopt any measures, in addition to the
maintenance of a strong fleet, by which such supplies
can be better secured and violent fluctuations avoided."
It was assumed by the Commissioners that the term " a
strong fleet " might be taken to imply the maintenance
of the fleet at such a level of strength, compared with that
of other nations, that there was no reasonable prospect
of this country's maritime supremacy in time of war being
seriously in danger. It was on that assumption that the
inquiry was conducted.
At the very outset, the Commissioners were at pains
to explain, after hearing a considerable body of expert
evidence, the standpoint from which they approached this
particular branch of their investigation. " We do not
fail to take into account," they declared, " that a little
time might elapse after the outbreak of war before our
Navy was able to assert its supremacy, nor that at a later
date some reverse might take place. However great our
confidence in the Navy may be, such a contingency as
a reverse is not impossible ; but it is necessary to define
very carefully what we mean by the term. A reverse
may be of varying degrees of importance ; it may affect
a particular fleet or only a detached squadron ; but
broadly, for our purpose, it is only necessary to distinguish
between a reverse that would cost us the command of the
sea, and one which would not. The former, which would
place our whole maritime trade at the mercy of an enemy,
would be a disaster of the gravest possible character.
Any lesser calamity, from the very fact that it would not
212 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
cost us the command of the sea, would not produce a set
of circumstances so far different from those with which
we are now about to deal as to require separate considera-
tion."
The report emphasised the fact that the Admiralty had
constantly, and with ever-increasing solicitude, considered
the steps to .be taken to afford adequate protection to
the Merchant Service. In this connection the Com-
missioners remarked that there was a certain degree of
misconception in some quarters as to the nature of the
protection which could be afforded by the Navy, or rather
in respect to the methods by which it could be given.
" It has sometimes been assumed that such protection
can only be given either by sending a number of cruisers
to protect the trade routes or by a system of convoy."
The Commissioners, having had the advantage of con-
sulting with the Admiralty, made a comment which, in
the light of war experience, was significant. In their
opinion protection of commerce could often be more
adequately given in other ways. They were impressed
by the knowledge that the supplies of food and raw
material on passage to the United Kingdom were distributed
among many ships rather than concentrated in a few, and
that the trade itself was conducted in a fairly constant
stream, and was not confined either to one period of the
year or to a single route. " These facts, especially when
taken in conjunction with the power afforded by steam of
varying the routes according to the necessities of any given
period, make the conditions of the chief trade routes
an extremely favourable one for successful defence."
The possibility of an effective blockade of the United
Kingdom was dismissed ; at that time the submarine
had only recently appeared on the naval horizon, the
small vessels of the type being always accompanied
by " parent ships," and possessing only limited radius
of action and low speed.
This conclusion having been reached, the ground was
cleared for an investigation of the important problem —
the protection which could be afforded to the Mercantile
Marine on the trade routes. Two general principles were
accepted. The first was that the command of the sea is
essential for the successful attack or defence of commerce,
and should, therefore, be the primary aim. The second
CH.V] CONCENTRATION OF FORCE 213
was that the attack on, or defence of, commerce is best
effected by concentration of force, and that a dispersion
of strength for either of those objects is the strategy of
the weak, and cannot materially influence the ultimate
results of the war. They remarked that " best opinions
all tend in the direction that the first and principal object
on both sides, in case of future maritime war, will be
to obtain command of the sea."
Reviewing the volume of authoritative evidence sub-
mitted to them, the Commissioners reached the following
conclusion : "It follows from this that concentration of
our forces will be the most effective protection that can
be given to our trade from attack by the regular men-of-
war of the enemy during, at any rate, the initial stages
of a maritime contest, and that the policy of an organised
attack on our commerce, if adopted, is not likely to meet
with any great measure of success. The enemy, in fact,
would find himself in this dilemma: on the one hand,
if he should endeavour to organise an extensive attack
on our trade, the inevitable result would be the serious
weakening of his fleet in the contest for the really decisive
factor — namely, the command of the seas : on the other,
if he should merely detach one or two cruisers for haras-
sing our commerce, and if these cruisers should escape
from the surveillance of our squadrons, the Admiralty
have pointed out . . . that we could always spare a superior
number of vessels to follow them. No doubt a considerable
number of ships might be required to effect the actual
capture of a single hostile commerce- destroyer, so long
at least as her coal lasted ; but it has been explained to
us by Sir Cyprian Bridge that, even if only one of our
cruisers were in pursuit, it could be made too dangerous
for a hostile cruiser to remain on or about a trade route.
Obviously, under these circumstances, her freedom of
action would be much hampered, and the damage she would
be able to inflict would be limited. It is, however, right
to mention that Sir Cyprian Bridge pointed out that it
is possible to overdo concentration, and he instanced the
mistaken policy of the Federal States in allowing the
ALABAMA to remain at sea practically unmolested. His
view was that protection can be best assured by having
sufficient cruisers to keep the enemy's commerce- destroyers
continually on the lookout for their own safety, while
214 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
concentrating the main force in the right place from a
purely strategic point of view."
Some members of the Royal Commission were still in
doubt as to the ability of the Fleet to fulfil its mission
of protection, assuming the country to be at war with any
two of the great ^maritime Powers. So a communication
was made to the Admiralty, in reply to which the Admiralty
stated that no guarantee could be given that no capture
whatever could be made by the enemy — " a position
impossible to maintain in argument " — but it was believed
that there would be no material -diminution in the supply
of wheat and flour reaching the United Kingdom. Finally,
in commenting upon the apprehension that the disposition
of the British Fleet, squadrons, or ships might be adversely
affected and the free action of the Admiralty impaired
by popular pressure, exercised through Parliament upon
the Government, thus influencing the Admiralty in-
structions to the admirals, it was remarked that the Ad-
miralty could never allow their action to be influenced
by any pressure, and yet consent to remain responsible
for the conduct of war.
The Commissioners afterwards turned to another aspect
of the question — viz., the policy which would most likely
be adopted by shipowners either voluntarily or by stress
of circumstances during a naval war. The evidence sub-
mitted on this question showed conclusively that any
general laying-up of steamers, either liners or tramps,
need not be expected, although a general rise in freights
would occur. Assuming, as the Commissioners generally
assumed, that shipowners would do their best to keep
their vessels running, attention was then directed to the
influence of steam on the enemy's operations against
merchantmen. This section of the report reflected the
best naval opinion of the day, and it is instructive, in
the light of actual war experience, to recall the views
which were expressed : " It is an interesting subject for
conjecture, whether the change from sails to steam will
or will not tell in favour of the chances of capture of mer-
chant vessels at sea. If it stood alone, it is probable that
the balance of evidence would tell in the direction of greater
immunity from capture. A steamer has freedom to choose
the least dangerous route, and to enter at the least danger-
ous time upon the area of the sea most likely to be in-
CH. v] INFLUENCE OF STEAM 215
fested with hostile cruisers ; and, moreover, when such
an area is entered, it can be passed through with greater
rapidity and certainty than was ever possible in the case
of a sailing-vessel. It seems also obvious that a steamer
is exposed to less danger than a sailing-vessel, which was
always at the mercy of winds and currents, and whose
escape was always barred for twelve points out of the
thirty- two of the compass. Moreover, the merchant vessel
can now change her course at will, and, by leaving directly
astern any possible pursuer so soon as sighted, can lengthen
the chase to the utmost possible limit.
" These considerations," it was added, " tell powerfully
in favour of the merchant vessel, though it may be said
that, if flight can be taken in any direction, attack may now
also come from any quarter so far as weather is concerned.
On the other hand, the telegraph is a powerful ally to the
attacking force, because it is now much less possible to
conceal the movements of important merchant vessels.
Without doubt, the telegraph will also to a certain extent
disclose the movements of the attacking force, but we think
the balance of advantage will be against the private
owners. In any case, the existence of submarine telegraphy
has probably put an end to the old system of collecting
merchant vessels together for the purpose of giving them
protection under the convoy of men-of-war. No assembly
of vessels for convoy can be kept secret, and the enemy
would, therefore, have an excellent chance of preparing
an attack. The Admiralty pointed out to us that a mass
of smoke by day, and even at times by night, would attract
any hostile cruiser that might be about. It may be added
that for commercial reasons the convoy system would not
now be of advantage, owing to the loss of time involved
in waiting for an escort, as well as to the fact that the
speed of the whole convoy would have to be regulated to
suit that of the slowest vessel."
Attention was also directed to another consideration.
" Engines and machinery have reduced the space available
for the personnel of warships as compared to that available
in the days of sailing-ships. A modern warship could
only to a very limited extent furnish prize crews, and she
would impair her fighting and steaming efficiency by so
doing." The restricted accommodation available for the
crews of captured merchantmen was also commented on.
216 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. T
It was declared that " modern conditions tend to limit the
capturing-power of regular war cruisers, it being remarked
that these observations do not, however, apply to ocean-
trading steamers converted and armed for the purpose of
attacking commerce." It was added that torpedo-craft
(i.e. destroyers and torpedo-boats) can neither spare prize
crews nor accommodate anyone above their complement
numbers. " If, therefore, employed against commerce, for
which they were never intended, such craft could only
compel merchant ships to follow them into port under
threat of being torpedoed. Moreover, these craft can only
operate within a comparatively short distance of their
shore bases."
After noting that the Admiralty had in process of for-
mation an organisation for keeping in touch with, and
giving advice to, the Mercantile Marine in the event of
an outbreak of hostilities, and urging that the matter
" should receive the earnest attention of those in authority,
as well on the part of the civil community as the Ad-
miralty," the Commissioners proceeded to sum up their
conclusions. They remarked that — " It must not be thought
from anything we have said that we are of opinion that
there will be no capture of British ships engaged in the
carrying trade. Whatever our naval strength might be,
some captures, as has already been pointed out, would
certainly take place. But with a strong fleet we find no
reason to fear such an interruption of our supplies as would
lead to the starvation of our people, nor do we see any
evidence that there is likely to be any serious shortage." l
At that time the submarine was as yet in its infancy,
and few craft of this type had been built by any
country, though in the year in which the Commission
reported Germany launched an experimental submarine
from the Germania Yard, Kiel.
II. PRE-WAR ARRANGEMENTS
During the nine years which intervened between the
publication of the Report of the Royal Commission on
Supply of Food and Raw Material in Time of War and the
1 Minority reports were issued : the quotations given are from the main
report of the Royal Commission.
CH. v] A PRINCIPLE OF NAVAL DEFENCE 217
actual outbreak of hostilities, in August 1914, considerable
attention was devoted to the measures to be taken to safe-
guard merchant shipping. In particular, the Committee
of Imperial Defence dealt with the matter in the course
of the elaboration of steps to be adopted to protect British
interests overseas. On May 19th, 1896, the Colonial
Defence Committee, which subsequently became a sub-
ordinate branch of the Committee of Imperial Defence,
had laid down the principle that — " The maintenance
of sea supremacy has been assumed as the basis of the
system of Imperial Defence against attack from over the
sea. This is the determinating factor in shaping the whole
defensive policy of the Empire, and is fully recognised by
the Admiralty, who have accepted the responsibility of
protecting all British territory abroad against organised
invasion from the sea. To fulfil this great charge, they
claim the absolute power of disposing of their forces in
the manner they consider most certain to secure success,
and object to limit the action of any part of them to the
immediate neighbourhood of places which they consider
may be more effectively protected by operations at a
distance."
That principle became the foundation upon which all
questions affecting the Mercantile Marine were considered.
As a consequence, the scale of defence to be provided at
oversea ports of the British Empire, which might be used
by merchant ships as well as men-of-war, was considered
in the light of that primary understanding. At the same
time, it was recognised that His Majesty's ships engaged
in seeking out and destroying the squadrons of an enemy
might not be in a position to prevent predatory raids on
British ports by hostile cruisers, which might temporarily
have succeeded in eluding their vigilance, and that
the capture of British shipping had also to be provided
against. It was also essential that the squadrons of His
Majesty's ships engaged in defending the trade routes
against such raids should have adequately defended bases.
"The object of the coast defences," it was declared, "is
to deter attack by a hostile fleet not supreme at sea, and
therefore not in a position to risk serious loss of fighting
efficiency. Such defences must, therefore, be strong enough
to be able to inflict substantial damage upon a squadron
suddenly attacking them ; but they are not required to
218 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
sustain a deliberate duel between forts and ships for a
prolonged period."
The whole subject of oversea port defence was recon-
sidered by the Colonial Defence Committee in 1910. The
assurance was then given that the Admiralty were of the
opinion that, so long as the then existing standard of naval
strength was maintained, British fleets would be in a
position effectually to frustrate any movements of enemy
ships on a large scale within a comparatively brief period
of their commencement, and it was assumed that any
movement of enemy ships on a large scale would be followed
up by a British foice with the least possible delay. It
was added in this connection that " the decisive advantages
accruing to the belligerent who succeeds in establishing
sea supremacy over his opponent are now well understood ;
and it is to be expected that any naval Powers hoping to
inflict serious injury upon us will, on the outbreak of war,
attempt to neutralise our naval superiority, and, if possible,
wrest from us the command of the sea. This object can
only be attained as the result of great naval battles, in
which the main fleets of the contending Powers are con-
centrated for decisive encounters. It is immaterial where
the great battles are fought. In whatever waters they
may take place, the result will be felt throughout the
world ; for after having disposed of the battle squadrons
of the enemy, the victor will be able to spread his force
with a view to capturing or destroying any detached force
of the enemy that may remain at sea. He will then be
in a position to gather the fruits of victory, in the shape
of the enemy's outlying possessions and his shipping and
commerce, or to prosecute an overseas campaign."
In the succeeding paragraph of the Committee's report,
attention was directed to a danger which the public, in
the early period of the war which was to break out in the
summer of 1914, was inclined to overlook. It was remarked
that, with a view to impairing the measures of concentration
in war and inducing a weakening of the main fleets, an
enemy might endeavour to create a widespread feeling of
insecurity and alarm throughout the Empire by utilising
such classes of vessels as were unfitted for taking part
in the decisive actions in raiding British sea-borne trade
and threatening distant portions of the Empire. It was
recognised that in themselves such raiding operations
CH. v] TRADE IN DISTANT SEAS 219
would be of only secondary importance, since the ultimate
issue of a naval war must depend on the result of the
fleet actions. It would, however, be necessary, it
was admitted, to take a vigorous offensive against all
such outlying raiding vessels in order to prevent the
demoralisation and disturbance of trade due to their
depredations.
The intelligence organisation which was maintained in
time of peace would, it was believed, enable the Admiralty
to learn the distribution at any moment of foreign navies,
and of all foreign merchant vessels likely to be employed
as armed auxiliaries. During the period of strained
relations preceding the outbreak of hostilities every effort
would be made, it was assumed, to keep the ships of the
prospective enemy under observation. The great increase
in the rapidity and certainty of transmission of intelligence
consequent upon the development of submarine cables
and radio-telegraphy were held to add to the difficulties of
raiding operations, depending for success, as they would,
on tactics of evasion and surprise. " Having regard to
our present naval strength and dispositions, attacks on
floating trade in distant seas will offer to an enemy but
slight prospect of any but transitory successes."
The policy elaborated by the Colonial Defence Com-
mittee, and endorsed by the Committee of Imperial De-
fence, was accepted by the Government of the day for its
guidance in framing the general defence policy not only
of the Empire, but of the Merchant Navy, its life-line.
Emphasis was laid upon the false strategy which might
lead to the premature dispatch of reinforcements to distant
seas, instead of delaying till a force could be sent so
superior to the squadrons of the enemy that there would
be practical certainty of engaging them with success. In
order to avoid exposing fleets to the risk of suffering
defeat in detail, naval action in remote waters, it was
admitted, might have to be postponed until, by the clearing
of the situation in home waters, adequate naval force could
be brought to bear.
Attention was devoted to local defences both by naval
and military forces, and to the necessity which might arise
for establishing temporary naval bases, and the require-
ments in the matter of defence of commercial ports were
also considered. In this connection the conclusions of the
220 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
Committee, endorsed at the time by naval and military
opinion, have a peculiar interest in view of the course
adopted by the enemy after the declaration of war. " An
enemy possessing a powerful battle fleet is unlikely to
undertake organised attacks on commerce in commercial
ports until an attempt at least has been made to cripple
our naval power, for which purpose his cruisers are likely
to be required, in the first instance, to act in conjunction
with his battleships. Isolated attacks on merchant
vessels met during the progress of some strategic move-
ments may indeed occur, but regular attacks on commerce
in distant waters, if they take place at all at the beginning
of a war, are more likely to be carried out by armed mer-
chant vessels than by hostile cruisers, which are not
likely, at that stage, to be available for such service. In
view of the supreme value of armoured vessels in war,
and of their great cost and consequent small numbers,
it is improbable that a squadron would undertake a sub-
sidiary operation such as the attack on a commercial port,
if the defence were of such a nature that the attackers
would run the risk of losing even one of their number,
or of receiving such injuries as to involve risk of capture
or immediate return to a base. Of recent years, foreign
naval Powers have almost without exception ceased to
lay down any but small unarmoured cruisers, and the
armoured cruisers now under construction approximate
to the battleship type. The great value of such armoured
vessels as adjuncts to the battle fleet renders it improbable
that they would be detached for attacks on commerce
or on commerical ports until the struggle for the command
of the sea has been decided. The older types of armoured
cruisers may, however, become available in the future
for subsidiary operations of this nature."
An attempt was made to forecast the probable policy
of the enemy with a view to suggesting the measures
which should be taken by the British Government to frus-
trate attempts to interfere with merchant shipping. The
British naval reply to attacks on commerce, it was re-
marked, would probably involve extended operations
with cruiser squadrons and single ships, taking full advan-
tage of the facilities afforded by our numerous commercial
ports as coaling places and as centres for the collection
and distribution of intelligence relating to the movements
CH. v] THE "WAR-BOOK" 221
of the enemy. In the circumstances anticipated, it was
decided that certain fortified commercial ports on fre-
quented trade routes would be useful as coaling-stations
and harbours of refuge, where merchant vessels could, in
case of need, seek protection from capture or molestation,
and await a favourable opportunity of proceeding on
their voyages. The need for fixed defence at certain great
commercial ports was also admitted. The measure of
protection, it was suggested, should be such as would
"involve such risk of injury to the attacking cruiser as
would not, in the opinion of a naval commander, be justi-
fied by the possible advantages to be obtained."
These statements are of interest as an indication that
long before the probability of war was realised by the nation
generally, and certainly before public attention had been
directed to the dangers which would threaten merchant
shipping at the outbreak of hostilities, the Government
of the day, acting through the Committee of Imperial
Defence, had been studying all the associated problems
with a view of proper action being taken to support the
influence exercised by the Fleet.
Furthermore, the Committee of Imperial Defence set
up a number of Sub- committees which considered the re-
sponsibilities which would be thrown upon the various
departments of the Government at the outbreak of war.
With the assistance of these bodies, upon which the Ad-
miralty, the Board of Trade, and the Post Office were
represented, as well as the shipping industry, the Standing
Sub- committee of the Committee of Imperial Defence
gradually built up what afterwards came to be known as the
4 War- Book." The object was to co-ordinate depart-
mental action on the occurrence of (a) strained relations
and (b) the outbreak of war. The volume covered a
wide field. But the present purpose is merely to refer to
that portion which dealt with British Merchant Shipping.
It is not necessary to consider in detail the large number
of orders which had been prepared in advance in order
to protect merchantmen cruising in distant waters, but
it is of interest to recall that provision was made for
appropriate action. On receipt of the notification of the
outbreak of war, His Majesty's diplomatic representatives
abroad had instructions to telegraph to every consular
officer stationed at a port in the country in which he
222 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
resided or its colonial possessions, directing warnings to be
given to British merchant ships not to proceed to or
enter enemy ports. Similar provision was made for the
warning of vessels in ports of British possessions abroad.
Steps were also taken for instructing representatives
abroad in the responsibilities with reference to merchant
shipping which would devolve upon them as soon as
war was declared, with a view to safeguarding British
merchant ships.
In the view of the Committee of Imperial Defence,
the main security to the Mercantile Marine was to be
found in the general naval arrangements made by the
Admiralty in the years preceding the outbreak of war.
In reply to Germany's policy of naval concentration,
the Grand Fleet, as it was subsequently described, came
into existence, changing the whole character of the
problem of providing for the safety of British merchant
shipping. The aim of the naval authorities was not to
blockade the enemy fleet — an intention which Nelson
always disclaimed — but to make such a disposition of the
main forces of the country as to reduce to a minimum the
probability of cruisers concentrated in the North Sea or
Baltic ports of Germany escaping on to the trade routes.
That object became in the course of time the decisive
principle of Admiralty policy. Admiral Sir Arthur Wilson,
who succeeded Lord Fisher as First Sea Lord, was led to
give an exposition of the views of the Admiralty when
the question of the possibility of invasion by the enemy
was agitating the public mind. In a memorandum which
he prepared for the Army Council in November 1910, he
declared that " the really serious danger that this country
has to guard against in war is not invasion, but interruption
of our trade and the destruction of our merchant shipping."
In the light of that conclusion, which reinforced the
views of previous Boards of Admiralty, he remarked
that " the strength of our fleet is determined by what is
necessary to protect our trade, and, if it is sufficient for
that, it will be almost necessarily sufficient to prevent
invasion, since the same disposition of the ships to a great
extent answers both purposes." That exposition of
policy showed that, even four years before the outbreak
of war, the Admiralty possessed what events were to show
to be a correct perception of the main duty which,
en. v] THE TRADE ROUTES 228
in the event of war, would devolve upon the fleet of a
sea- dependent country, itself the centre of a maritime
empire.
The adoption of the principle of concentration of naval
force in the main theatre of war reduced the proportions
of the problem of protecting merchant shipping, but it
did not eliminate that problem. The Admiralty provided
for squadrons to be stationed in the outer seas under peace
conditions. Plans were also drawn up for commissioning
special squadrons which on the outbreak of war would be
dispatched for the patrol of the areas where the great trade
routes, in turning in towards the British Isles, converge.
The accompanying charts give a general idea of the dis-
tribution of naval force on the outbreak of war, and carry
a reminder of the vast area of the sea, water covering
nearly three-quarters of the earth's surface, and of the
limited influence exerted by the restricted number of cruisers
available after provision had been made for the needs of
the Grand Fleet. Reference to those charts supplies the
necessary corrective to any opinion unfavourable to the
naval authorities which the narrative of the capture of
British shipping during the early period of hostilities
may have suggested. As has been indicated, both from
the declaration of policy made by the Admiralty to the
Royal Commission on Supply of Food and Raw Material
in time of War, and from the reports of the Committee
of Imperial Defence which have already been quoted,
the naval authorities gave no guarantee, and believed
that no guarantee could be given, that British merchant
shipping would not suffer loss before enemy cruisers
in distant seas could be rounded up and destroyed.
It was foreseen that a considerable period might elapse
before this object could be achieved, since the enemy
would operate with many advantages in a trackless waste,
and the Admiralty also foresaw that ships engaged in
raiding British ocean-borne commerce might extend their
careers by living upon merchant shipping captured,
taking from such vessels coal, food, and stores, and then
destroying the hulls.
16
224 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
III. THE CREATION OF THE TRADE DIVISION
OF THE WAR STAFF
During the proceedings of the Royal Commission on
Supply of Food and Raw Materials in Time of War, at-
tention was drawn to the need of an organisation at the
Admiralty to receive from the shipping community in-
formation as to the movements of merchant ships, and to
give advice to shipowners, in the event of an outbreak of
hostilities, as to the voyages which their vessels might
undertake with comparative safety, with more special
reference to those points at which such vessels might expect
to find protection. It was then stated by the Admiralty
— that is, ten years before the opening of the war — that
44 an organisation of the kind is now in process of forma-
tion." The Commissioners stated that they were not
satisfied that the means of communication between the
Royal Navy and the Mercantile Fleet would on the out-
break of war be found sufficient to enable information
to be conveyed to merchant vessels at sea, or that the
orders of the Admiralty conveyed through the admirals
by His Majesty's ships to merchant vessels would be under-
stood. In the main report of the Commission a strong
recommendation was made that " this matter should
receive the early attention of those in authority, as well
on the part of the shipping community as on the part of
the Admiralty."
The problem of the best means of protecting trade
continued under almost uninterrupted consideration by
successive Directors of the Naval Intelligence Department.
The matter was one which fell specially within the pro-
vince of the Trade Division of that Department. During
the early phases of the investigation, Captain Inglefield,
Captain Harry Jones, and Captain Scott were concerned in
the matter. In August 1906, Captain Henry Campbell was
appointed to the Trade Division, and he at once began a
very thorough investigation of the whole subject, Captain
Charles Ottley having become Director of Naval Intelli-
gence. Some progress was made, but it was not until
Captain Edmond Slade became Director of Naval Intelli-
gence that a practicable scheme began to take shape. In
March 1908, Captain Campbell submitted a memorandum
consisting of a complete and detailed examination of the
CH. v] AN INTELLIGENCE SCHEME 225
problem. He received orders from the Director to amplify
his arguments in favour of a system of advice, assistance,
and decentralisation, in association with an intelligence
scheme on the main trade routes. Captain Campbell
suggested that " by leaving the owners in charge of their
own ships, the control would be sectional ; every vessel
would have its own brain, so to speak, working out its
own safety." He urged that under war conditions the
owners, captains, and crews of merchant ships would be
all personally interested in the safe arrivals of the vessels.
" If they could be given some idea of what and where the
dangers awaiting them were . . . they would be perfectly
capable of avoiding and running through those dangers,
for that is, after all, what their ordinary life is daily fitting
them to do. And they would know, too, not only what was
the best method of getting home, but also probably the
quickest, and each would do this for his own individual
case, and never bother with generalities." The purpose
of this intelligence scheme was to obtain information,
both positive and negative, from as wide an area as possible
in order to make the best use of the protective force avail-
able and give advice to shipping. The aim was to provide
the nucleus of an organisation, practised and developed
in peace-time, which would combine all the facilities for
receiving and disseminating intelligence through various
channels — naval, diplomatic, Indian, Colonial, Customs,
Lloyd's and other commercial organisations — and it was
proposed to operate it by appointing officers at the
principal commercial ports throughout the world, who
would form a complete system of information bureaux.
It is not too much to say that the action taken in this
direction before the opening of the war saved the country
from heavy loss, and at the same time enabled the trade
routes to be kept open.
The nucleus of an organisation having been formed, the
Trade Division was abolished in October 1909 and not
resuscitated until August 1913, when it was re-formed as
the Trade Branch of the Operations Division of the
recently formed War Staff, being placed under Captain
Richard Webb, assisted by a small staff. The reconstitution
of this branch of the War Staff indicated that the naval
authorities had finally come to the conclusion that special
provision was necessary for dealing with matters affecting
226 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
merchant shipping when war occurred, but the smallness
of the personnel might have suggested that there was an
inadequate appreciation of the number and complexity of
the problems which war would raise in an acute form.
On the other hand, such an organisation under peace
conditions was necessarily on a modest scale, as its
duty consisted merely in laying the foundations for
action after hostilities had broken out ; it formed the
nucleus upon which an adequately-staffed branch of
the War Staff could be built up when the necessity
arose. Before the end of August 1914 it was, how-
ever, found necessary to expand this branch of the
Operations Division into a separate division of the War
Staff, known as the Trade Division. As the war pro-
gressed, its personnel was gradually increased in order to
enable it to deal with this aspect of the war, and, in
particular, to meet the requirements of the Mercantile
Marine, the fishing industry, and the blockade of the
enemy. As the organisation grew, the division was split
up into separate sections to deal with various phases
of the work, and, owing to the decision to institute a general
system of Convoys which had been arrived at in June
1917, the Route-giving Section of the Trade Division
was, at the end of September 1917, placed under Captain
Frederic A. Whitehead as Director of Mercantile Move-
ments, as was also the Convoy organisation for which
Paymaster-Captain H. Eldon Manisty had been directly
responsible since his appointment as Organising Manager
of Convoys on June 25th, 1917. Under Captain Alan
Hotham, who at the same time succeeded Captain Webb,
the duties of the Trade Division were grouped into three
main sections, each under a Captain R.N., to deal with
(a) Trade and Blockade ; (b) Equipment of Ships and
Instruction of Personnel ; (c) Shipping Intelligence,
Casualties, etc. No department of the Admiralty responded
more efficiently to the urgent demands of war than the
Trade Division of the War Staff in the early phase
of the operations at sea and during its subsequent
course. Step by step, as the necessity demanded, the
organisation was strengthened, until it became in
time one of the most important divisions of the War
Staff.
Previous to the outbreak of the war, with the exception
CH.V] THE MERCHANT NAVY'S PERSONNEL 227
of R.N.R. officers and naval chief petty officers ap-
pointed for duties with defensively armed merchant
vessels at the ports of London, Liverpool, and Southamp-
ton, no direct link existed between the Admiralty and the
Mercantile Marine ; officers and men of the Royal Naval
Reserve came, of course, under Admiralty instructions
when under training, and when called up for war service,
but the Mercantile Marine itself carried out its operations
without naval control or jurisdiction. It was subject only
to the Board of Trade, and the duties of that department,
as has already been stated, were confined generally to
enforcing provision for the safety of life and the proper
treatment of seamen. The Merchant Service was regarded
as a trade organisation, and the influence of legislation for
some years previous to the opening of the war had been
in the direction of weakening the disciplinary authority
of masters over their crews. In a military sense, the
Merchant Navy was an undisciplined force. While the
great shipping firms maintained a regular body of officers,
they drew upon the labour market as necessary for man-
ning the ships, men in the oversea trade signing on for the
voyage and then being discharged.
The occurrence of war revealed the rather unsatisfactory
character of the limited control exercised over the per-
sonnel of the Merchant Navy. The Admiralty had at
once to take up a large number of ships for fleet purposes,
apart from the vessels required as transports, and the naval
authorities had also to accept responsibility for the safety
of about half the mercantile shipping of the world,
which was at once exposed to enemy attack. Ten years
previously the Admiralty had stated that " the number of
British merchant steamers which would be taken up by
the Government in war-time is so small, compared to the
total number available, that it is not believed that the
British carrying trade could be seriously interfered with." l
At that time the Grand Fleet did not exist, and the Ex-
peditionary Force had not been organised. The naval
and military conditions affecting shipping had undergone
a radical change by the time hostilities opened. In ad-
dition, Germany had revealed herself as the probable
enemy in the event of war, and she had gradually increased
1 Report of the Royal Commission on Supply of Food and Raw Material
in Time of War, vol. i, Annex A.
228 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
her naval representation in foreign waters. The menace
to the British Mercantile Marine from German men-of-war
had consequently increased by 1914, apart from the
threat which the Austro-Hungarian Fleet offered in the
Mediterranean.
IV. THE WAR INSURANCE SCHEMES
The Admiralty's admission that a guarantee could not
be given that no merchant ships would be sunk by an
enemy brought home to the Government and the shipping
industry a clearer apprehension of the conditions which
would exist in the event of war. The Royal Commission
on Supply of Food and Raw Material in Time of War
had expressed the belief that a guarded and well-con-
sidered scheme of national indemnity would act as a
powerful addition to our resources, but a Treasury Com-
mittee, appointed in 1907 with Mr. Austen Chamberlain
as Chairman, declined to recommend the adoption of
any form of national guarantee against the war risks
of shipping and maritime trade "except that which
is provided by the maintenance of a powerful navy."
While Sir Frederick Bolton, of Lloyd's, was quietly
working on the problem at the Admiralty, shipowners,
in order to meet the situation which they feared
would be created on the outbreak of war, determined
to organise themselves, following the example already
set by the North of England Association. On the
outbreak of war nearly three-fourths of the British
steamship tonnage employed in the overseas trade was
embraced in the various War Risks Insurance Clubs or
Associations.
In May 1913 the Prime Minister formed a Sub- com-
mittee of the Committee of Imperial Defence " to consider
the insurance of British ships in time of war." This
Committee consisted of the Right Honourable F. Huth
Jackson, Lord Inchcape, Sir Norman Hill, Secretary of
the Liverpool Steamship Owners' Association, Sir Ray-
mond Beck, Deputy Chairman of Lloyd's, and Mr. Arthur
Lindley, with Captain Maurice Hankey J as Secretary,
i Now Lieut. -Col. Sir M. P. A. Hankey, G.C.B,
CH. v] BASIS OF THE PROBLEM 229
It adopted a series of general principles in the following
terms :
(1) As laid down in the terms of reference, the scheme
must be on the basis of reasonable contributions being
paid by the owners of ships and cargoes towards the cost
of insurance.
(2) The main object of the State is to keep the trade of
the country going, and not to make a profit.
(3) Nevertheless, it is necessary to safeguard the State
against incalculable financial liabilities, and more particu-
larly against fraud.
(4) If the scheme is to have any prospect of success,
it is essential to avoid the hostility of any of the
interests concerned. It is, therefore, necessary to avoid
any step prejudicial to the legitimate business of ship-
owners, insurance brokers, underwriters, merchants, or
bankers.
(5) The scheme should avoid the appearance of a
gratuitous gift from the State to a particular trade,
at a time when all branches of trade will be very
much hampered, and every class of the population will
be subject to unforeseen and incalculable risks of
loss.
(6) It should, on the other hand, avoid disclosing to
the enemy the real conditions prevailing at any moment,
by the quotation of official rates of insurance corresponding
to the actual risks as known to the Admiralty.
(7) It should avoid or minimise, as far as possible, the
administrative difficulties which will fall upon the State —
e.g., of valuation, avoidance of fraud, congestion of business,
etc.
At the outset it was apparent that the formation of
the mutual insurance associations, or clubs, had eliminated
some of the difficulties which had hindered action in the
past. The North of England Protecting and Indemnity
Association comprised, in its war risks class, steamers of
a value of about £30,000,000. The London group of War
Risks Associations had steamers of a value of £27,000,000
on its books. The London and Liverpool War Risks
Insurance Association (Limited) comprised steamers of a
value of about £60,000,000, Thus the total values insured,
230 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
in these three associations amounted to about £87,000,000,
while the total steamer tonnage of the United Kingdom
engaged in foreign trade was valued in 1911 at £127,000,000.
The risks covered by these associations differed somewhat in
detail, but the main principles embodied in their insurance
were the same. They covered fully the risks incident to
a war, so long as the United Kingdom was neutral, but the
risks covered incident to a war in which this country
was a party were strictly limited.
In its report, this Sub-committee of the Committee of
Imperial Defence pointed out that " the losses and claims
to meet which these Insurance Clubs were formed are those
which are excluded from the ordinary marine insurance
policy by the following, or similar clause : 4 Warranted
free from capture, seizure, and detention, and the con-
sequences thereof, or any attempt thereat, barratry,
piracy, riots, and civil commotions excepted, and also
from all consequences of hostilities or warlike operations,
whether before or after declaration of war.' ' This cover
applied both in the case of war between two foreign nations,
and also when Great Britain was one of the belligerents ;
but when Great Britain was at war the cover was limited
in the case of vessels actually at sea, or in any enemy
port, on the declaration of war or the outbreak of hostilities,
until the time of first arrival at a British or neutral port
which was a safe port for the ship to lie in. The period
of cover while in such safe places varied. In one Club it was
limited to ten days, in another to thirty days, while in a
third it extended to the date of expiry of the policy.
Vessels which were not at sea on the outbreak of hostilities,
but were in a safe port, were held insured while they re-
mained there, for a similar period. Every vessel was
deemed to be insured against all perils covered by an or-
dinary marine insurance policy, so long, of course, as it
sailed under the British flag. There were a number of
other conditions which it is not necessary to mention in
detail. Only a nominal initial premium, amounting to
a few pence per cent, on the value entered, was charged
to cover the expenses of management, but the members
shared all losses on the basis of the insured values. The
Club insurances were effected on February 20th in
each year, running until the same date in the following
year, when, in ordinary circumstances, the policies were
CH. v] INCOMPLETED VOYAGES 231
automatically renewed for another year. One essential
fact emphasised by the Sub-committee was this — that it
might happen that, " within a very short period after the
outbreak of war in which we were one of the belligerents,
the movements of practically the whole of the shipping
under the British flag would be arrested, except, perhaps,
in such areas (if any) as were outside the possibility of
interference by the enemy."
The first point, then, to claim the Sub-committee's
attention was the provision for the completion of voyages
current at the outbreak of war, which would be automati-
cally interrupted under the mutual insurance arrangements.
Sir Norman Hill, the Secretary of the Liverpool and Lon-
don War Risks Insurance Association, suggested that the
Associations might be induced to run a maximum of 20
per cent, of the total King's enemy risks on current voy-
ages, on condition that the State undertook the remaining
80 per cent, of these risks. He was quite convinced that
shipowners would not be prepared to pay any premium
to cover these additional risks which they would be under
no obligation to incur at a time when, for the most part,
they would be running at peace freights. Under the
conditions of many bills of lading, they could, on the out-
break of war, discharge their cargo at a safe port, and start
on a new voyage, at war rates of freight, as soon as in-
surance could be arranged. Failing this, it would probably
suit them better, it was added, to lay up their ships for six
or twelve months — a policy which some firms had adopted
in recent years when they had been unable to obtain
remunerative freights. The Sub-committee were in-
formed that " managers of shipping companies might con-
sider themselves under an obligation to their shareholders
not to send ships to sea without war risk insurance, and
that every mortgage deed or debenture bond had a
stipulation of some kind that the vessel shall be amply
insured."
Passing on to a closer examination of the problem,
the Sub- committee thought it desirable to consider
whether any scheme was possible which would avoid
publicity before the outbreak of war. The plan that
suggested itself was that the State should, immediately
on the opening of war, make a public announcement that
it was willing to accept 80 per cent, of the King's enemy
232 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
risks for the completion of all current voyages from the
time when the cover provided by the Club policies ceased.
The difficulties which this scheme raised were weighed
by the Sub-committee, and eventually it was decided
to propose that the existing standard form of policy of
the Associations should be altered so as to include the
additional risks involved. This new form of policy would
run from year to year as was at the time the case, a list
of the policies issued by each Club being given to the State
every year. The State would enter into a general agree-
ment with each Association, accepting responsibility for
80 per cent, of the King's enemy losses incurred under
these policies in the case of a war in which we were one
of the belligerents. The insurance would remain in force
for ten clear days following the arrival of the ship at her
port of destination. The war risks, other than King's
enemy risks, would be covered under the same Club policy,
but for these the Club would alone be responsible.
Going a step further, the Sub-committee agreed that
words should be introduced into the new policies providing
a warranty that after the outbreak of war ships should,
as far as possible, carry out any orders that the
Admiralty might give in regard to routes, ports of call, and
stoppages. If they failed to carry out the orders, it was
provided that they should lose the benefit of insurance,
unless the insured could satisfy the Committee of the Club
that the breach of orders happened without the fault
or privity of the assured and of the owners and of the
managers of the ship. Even in those circumstances, it
was thought that the shipowners should be liable to some
penalty, and it was suggested that the State should require
that the rules of every approved Club should contain
provision for an appropriate penalty, taking the form of a
levy of an extra premium payable by the member to the
Club on the insured value of the ship in which the breach
had taken place, or of a deduction in the settlement of
a claim of an amount to be fixed, within reasonable limits,
by the Committee of the Club. In extreme cases, the
Committee, it was suggested, might have the power of
expelling a member from the Club.
The Sub- committee, in its recommendations relating to
ships afloat at the time of the outbreak of war, considered
that the fact that the Clubs, and through them the ship-
CH. v] INSURANCE OF NEW VOYAGES 233
owners, would retain 20 per cent, of the risks involved, and
pay the whole cost of administration, might be looked upon
as a "reasonable contribution to wards the cost of insurance."
The managers of the Clubs stated that some arrangement
for the completion of the current voyages without payment
of premium would probably be necessary as an inducement
to the members of the Clubs to accept the proposals for
covering the insurance of vessels starting after the out-
break of war. It was calculated that the scheme would
involve a State liability of £3,000,000. In explanation of
its recommendations, the Sub-committee added : " It
may be argued that, even if our suggestions are adopted,
they will not compel any ship to complete its voyage after
the outbreak of war. It will still be optional for the ship-
owner to give directions that his ship is to go to a safe port
and remain there until the war is over. We admit that,
if this policy were generally adopted, our scheme would
fail in its main object ; but we think that few, if any,
shipowners are likely to adopt this policy. In the first
place, the vessels on voyages current at the outbreak of
war will only be earning peace freights, and it will be a
strong inducement to the owner to get his present voyage
completed, so that he may be able to take advantage of
the higher freights for new voyages which would pre-
sumably be offered after the outbreak of war. And,
further, the shipowner would realise that, even if he laid
up his ship, he would not thereby escape his liability to
contribute pro rata to the loss of other ships insured in
his Club which had run the risks he was afraid of."
Turning to the insurance of hulls of ships on voyages
commenced after the outbreak' of hostilities, it was pro-
posed that these should be similarly insured by the As-
sociations, and reinsured by the State to the extent of
80 per cent, of such risks. The premiums would be
collected by the Associations when issuing their policies,
and 80 per cent, of them would be accounted for to the
State in consideration of its taking 80 per cent, of the risks
insured under the Club policies, " a warranty being in-
serted that ships will not sail when ordered by His Majesty's
Government not to do' so." The Sub-committee proposed
that the rates of premium for such new voyages should
be fixed by the State, varied from time to time, and it was
added : " It will, in our opinion, be necessary to have
234 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
different rates of premium for different zones, and it may be
found advisable, during the course of the war, to change the
rates for certain of these zones. But we are strongly of
opinion that the different rates should be as few as possible,
and also that the changes in these rates should be as in-
frequent as possible. It is admitted that the State is
not undertaking this business with a view to making a
profit out of it, but solely with the object of preventing
the interruption of our overseas commerce in time of war,
owing to inability to insure against war risks through the
usual channels. The rates charged by the State must not,
therefore, be so low as to compete with the rates that the
insurance market may be willing to quote, nor must they
be so high as to be prohibitive, or materially to affect
the cost of the food or other merchandise being brought
to or carried from these shores. At the same time, it
would be obviously unfair to the State's partners in this
business — the individual shipowners in the Clubs — that
they should be called upon either to pay premiums out of all
proportion to the risks of the voyages undertaken, or to
bear their share of losses in respect of voyages insured at
much too low a premium. It is for this reason that we
recommend that the premium charged should to some
extent depend upon the risks involved. But we should
like to suggest that the maximum rate for any voyage
should be 5 per cent., and the minimum rate 1 per cent.,
and that any rate accepted for a particular voyage shall
hold good, provided that the ship starts within fourteen
days after acceptance of the risk."
Provision was suggested for representation of the State
on the Committee of each Club or Association : the claims,
it was added, would be dealt with by the Committee of the
Club. Some difference of opinion was expressed as to when
and how payment of claims should be made. On this
matter the Sub-committee reported that " the general
principle underlying the proposed arrangements between
the State and the Clubs is that the Clubs take the whole
of the risks, and reinsure 80 per cent, of them with the
State. A Club would, therefore, be primarily liable for
the settlement of the amount involved." The conclusion
was reached that " the State had no concern with the in-
ternal arrangements of the Clubs with regard to the
collection of the contributions from their members to an
CH. vj METHOD OF PAYMENT 285
ascertained loss. Even if the Club were unable to collect
from its members the whole amount required, this would
not affect the State's liability to pay over its 80 per cent,
of an agreed claim to the Club." The rules of all the
Clubs then existing provided that if a ship were captured,
seized, or detained, the owner should have no claim for
total loss unless the capture, seizure, or detention, should
have continued for a certain period. This period varied
in the different Clubs from one month to six months.
The Sub-committee proposed that, under the arrangement
with the State, the Clubs should not be bound to pay a
total loss if the ship were recaptured, released, or restored
to the owner within six months of the date of capture ;
but if the vessel was restored, the Club should pay the
cost of repair or damage to and expenses incurred by
the ship by reason of such capture, together with a sum
equal to 10 per cent, per annum on the insured value from
the date of capture. Also, in the event of loss by destruc-
tion, it was decided that no payment should be made
within a period of six months of the loss. It followed,
therefore, that the earliest time of payment by the State
for a total loss or capture would be six months after the
event. In those circumstances, the Sub-committee recom-
mended that the liability of the State should be dis-
charged in three equal instalments : at six, nine, and
twelve months from the date of loss or capture, with in-
terest at the rate of 4 per cent, per annum. One of the
principal objects in suggesting deferred payments was to
relieve the State as far as possible from immediate and,
perhaps, heavy calls on its resources to meet these losses,
at a time when its revenue would be strained to the ut-
most to meet the expense of carrying on the war.
Turning to the basis of the value of shipping for the
purpose of war risks insurance which should be accepted,
the Sub-committee found that the practice of the various
Associations differed in this respect. " We suggest that,
for the purposes of this arrangement, the basis of values
should be the first cost of the vessel, without allowance
for the cost of alterations or additions, less depreciation
at the rate of 4 per cent, per annum, but without any
minimum limit per ton. This is the basis accepted for
income-tax purposes, and we consider it a reasonable
one ; but we think the Committee of each Club should have
236 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
the right, at its discretion, to refuse to accept a vessel
for insurance on this basis, if they are of opinion that the
value thus arrived at is excessive. The agreement for
valuation on this basis will be provided for in the articles
of association or rules of the Club which will, in accordance
with the practice of the Clubs, be incorporated in the
policies."
It is unnecessary in this connection to deal at length
with the proposals for the insurance of cargoes.1 The
Sub-committee, in the concluding remarks in its Report,
dated April 30th, 1914, suggested that, if its proposals
were approved, they should be made public as soon as
possible. It was urged that the earliest possible publicity
was essential, " not only in order that the necessary
changes in the present arrangements for mutual insurance
of hulls should be made by the Clubs, but also in order
that the details of our proposals for insuring cargoes
may be carefully prepared and periodically revised by
the Board of Advisers which we recommend should be
appointed for the purpose." While admitting that, in the
absence of experience of the effect of naval warfare on
British overseas trade, it was impossible to form any
reliable estimate of the State's liability, it was estimated
that " the total losses on hulls insured against premiums
would be £6,133,750, and the State's share of those losses
would be £4,907,000." " We estimate the value of the
steamship tonnage remaining available for foreign trade
during the six months following the outbreak of war at
£122,675,000. Under normal conditions each vessel in
that part of our foreign trade which is with the United
Kingdom makes, on the average, ten voyages each year,
counting each outward and inward voyage as a separate
voyage. If that average can be taken as generally ap-
plicable, and if the number of voyages be maintained
after the outbreak of war, premiums at the average rate
of 1 per cent, per voyage on the new voyages would in six
months be sufficient to cover the whole of the losses on hulls
insured against premiums." The difficulty of estimating
the total value of cargoes carried in British steam-
ships in foreign trade during the six months following
the outbreak of war was greater. In the circumstances,
the Sub-committee accepted, as a basis for its calculations,
1 Cf. Seaborne Trade, by Mr. C. E. Fayle.
CH. v] A PRACTICAL SCHEME 23?
that the values would be £800,000,000. If the whole of
these cargoes were insured with the State Office, the as-
sumed loss would be covered by premiums at the rate
of 1 per cent, per voyage. It was added that, " It is pro-
bable that at average premiums of 1 per cent, per voyage
the greater part of the hulls would, through the Clubs,
be insured with the State, but the amount of cargo so
insured, and therefore the amount of cargo at the risk
of the State, would depend largely on the facilities offered
by the insurance market." Finally, it was remarked
that, " when every allowance is made, it will be seen that,
even on an assumed loss of nearly 10 per cent, of all
British steamers employed in our foreign trade, which
on the outbreak of war, and for six months thereafter,
are at risk, the claim on the State in respect of hulls and
cargo would be but a very small percentage on the total
volume of our trade."
In concluding its report, the Sub-committee submitted
that they had prepared " an administratively practicable
scheme." " We believe that it will secure that, in case
of war, British steamships will not be generally laid up,
and that oversea commerce will not be interrupted, by
reason of the inability to cover the war risks of ships and
cargoes by insurance. Even if the maximum premium
of 5 per cent, on ships and of 5 per cent, on cargoes is
charged for all voyages, and the whole of this premium
is borne by cargoes, the total increased cost of such cargoes,
on account of war risk insurance, will not be excessive,
and will not, in our opinion, approach the extreme fluctu-
ation in prices of many articles, especially of articles of
food, in recent years."
It was a fortunate circumstance that the subject of war
risk insurance had been considered, and a practical scheme
dealing with hulls and cargoes drawn up, before the shadow
of war was thrown across the country. As the report
of the Sub-committee had not been published, the nation
generally was in ignorance of the steps which had been
taken to grapple with the situation which rapidly de-
veloped towards the end of July 1914. The Board of
Trade kept itself informed of the trend of events, and during
the days of uncertainty as to the issue of the action which
diplomatists were taking, it was in constant communication
with the managers of the three Clubs to which reference
238 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
has been made. On Saturday, July 31st, Sir H. Llewelyn
Smith, the Secretary of the Board of Trade, informed
them that the Government had determined to adopt
the scheme of the reinsurance of hulls, and requested them
to arrange at once for the issue of revised forms of policy.
This was done with the utmost dispatch. As an illustra-
tion, it may be added that on August 4th, when the British
declaration of war expired, Sir Norman Hill addressed a
circular to the members of the Liverpool Association
explaining the Government scheme, and stating that his
Committee had decided to bring the new forms of insurance
into operation " without waiting for completion of legal
formalities as to the actual issue of the new form of
policies." He added that, " pending the completion of
all such formalities, an undertaking had been given on
behalf of the Government that the State will hold itself
bound as if the reinsurance had been given."
The prompt action of the Government, in association
with a certain feeling of nervousness, led many large
firms who had previously effected their own insurances
to join the Clubs. In this way, practically the whole
work of reinsurance of steamships under the Government
scheme was conducted from the first by the three
Associations. Forms of policy were immediately drawn up
by the Clubs for issue to their members for current and
new voyages, together with a form of reinsurance in regard
to each such policy as between the Board of Trade and the
Associations. In illustration of the celerity with which the
scheme was put into operation, it may be added that the
agreement between the Board of Trade and the Associations
was dated August 14th, 1914, although some of its details
were not completed until a few weeks later. This delay
did not interfere with the operations of the scheme, which
from the first centred in the Marine Department of the
Board of Trade. The managers of the various Associations
rendered the most efficient help in this department. Sir
Maurice Hill, K.C., placed his services at the disposal
of the Board as a legal adviser, and gave valuable assistance
both in drafting and in interpreting. From the very
outset the relations between the central department and the
Associations were placed on a satisfactory footing, with
the result that the scheme worked smoothly and the danger-
ous dislocation of ocean-borne commerce which the enemy
CH. v] A WORLD-WIDE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE 239
no doubt hoped to produce was averted. As to cargoes,
it need only be added that the Sub- committee's recom-
mendations were also adopted, the Advisory Committee
for the National Insurance of British Shipping, with Mr.
(afterwards Sir) Douglas Owen as Chairman, holding its
first meeting on August 5th, and a War Risks Insurance
Office was opened forthwith at Cannon Street Hotel, to be
moved later on to 33-35 King William Street.
The precautionary measures adopted by the Admiralty,
and the prompt action of the Board of Trade, saved the
situation. Shipowners, charterers, masters and men were
given confidence at a moment when there was a possibility
of panic, and from the first day of hostilities the British
Mercantile Marine continued its sailings under Admiralty
advice with almost the same freedom as under the con-
ditions of peace.
V. ADMIRALTY DIRECTIONS TO SHIPPING
The imminence of hostilities in July 1914 prompted the
Admiralty to get into direct touch with the shipping
community as soon as possible. In the emergency, the
Customs, Lloyd's, and the War Risks Clubs, as well as the
Brethren of Trinity House, rendered invaluable aid ; all
their resources were placed unreservedly at the disposal of
the Admiralty. The officers at Whitehall dealing with
trade matters were thus enabled to get at once into com-
munication with ships and shipowners more quickly and
with more satisfactory results than would otherwise have
been the case. It is impossible to lay too much stress on
the salutary influence of the close relations between the
naval authorities and the shipping industry which came
into existence in the summer of 1914. The Consular and
Colonial services also gave great assistance, and the Foreign,
Colonial, and Indian Offices promptly transmitted Ad-
miralty instructions to their officials for the information
of ships in distant waters, through the medium of the
Intelligence Scheme already described, thus enabling the
Admiralty to establish a very complete chain of commu-
nications all over the world. That intelligence service,
varied in character and efficient in operation, proved of
incalculable value.
The first and most urgent necessity which confronted
17
240 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [en. v
the Admiralty was to convey to the British Mercantile
Marine, distributed in all the seas, short and compre-
hensive instructions embodying the policy of the naval
authorities in relation to the protection of trade. Orders
to His Majesty's ships operating in and about the trade
routes had been in existence for some time, and they formed
the basis on which the early directions to merchant ship-
ping were framed. As a normal matter of peace routine,
commanders-in- chief and senior officers of British naval
forces had received instructions from the Admiralty as
to the action to be taken in the event of war in order to
afford protection to merchant shipping. These orders
were based upon the well-established principle that the
surest way of striking an effective blow at the enemy, and
at the same time safeguarding tonnage and territory,
was a prompt attack upon the enemy's fighting-ships.
That principle had guided British policy for centuries.
The primary object — the annihilation of the enemy's
forces — included the secondary, the security of British
ocean-borne commerce. Subsidiary to both those objects
was the capture of enemy merchant vessels with the
object of stopping his trade and all contraband destined
for his use. It was suggested by the Admiralty, in its
earliest orders, that the patrolling of areas or routes on
the chance of meeting an enemy on them was not feasible,
and the allotting of single vessels along the routes was
also condemned. It was declared that the salient points
and the confluences of the various ocean routes used by the
British Merchant Marine were the most profitable places
for its destruction by enemy vessels, and if those points
were in W.T. communication with British W.T. stations,
they were the best positions in which to work and await in-
telligence of the enemy's movements. It was added that
the forces employed in company should be of such a
strength as to afford reasonable prospects of searching for
and engaging the enemy with success. Those instructions
embodied rudimentary principles. Their restatement was
necessary in view of the tendency to confusion of thought
which had occurred since the steam-engine made its
appearance, suggesting that the character of the menace
offered by enemy ships, and the best means of combating
that menace, had undergone changes deep, permanent,
and revolutionary. However widespread those opinions
CH. v] COUNSELS OF WEAKNESS 241
may have been during the Victorian period, the clouds
of doubt had been dispersed long before the opening of
hostilities. It is apparent, from the action of Admirals
and other senior officers during the opening phase of the
war, that the naval authorities had reached a right con-
clusion as to the policy to be adopted by a supreme
navy in protecting the Mercantile Marine under its
national flag.
Although the possibility that the enemy might employ
submarines to prey on commerce could not be ignored
after the sinking of the HOGUE, CRESSY, and ABOUKIR on
September 22nd, 1914, and the destruction of the merchant
ship Glitra in the following October, the primary concern of
the Admiralty during the early phase of the war was for
the safety of vessels, both naval and mercantile, attacked
by enemy cruisers. The naval authorities had always
admitted that, if sailings were maintained during the first
few weeks of war, some losses were inevitable. It had been
suggested in some quarters that it might be advisable
for all ships, on the outbreak of war, to be warned to put
into the nearest friendly port, and remain there until a
guarantee of safety could be given by the Admiralty.
That policy would have freed the naval authorities from
a heavy responsibility, while attention was devoted ex-
clusively to hunting down enemy cruisers and providing
escort for the transports which were on passage from India,
the Dominions, the Crown Colonies, and the Dependencies.
These counsels were, however, rejected. The bold
policy was adopted of urging merchant shipping to
continue its operations. In these circumstances, the
Admiralty had to choose between three courses. The
first was the concentration of trade on definite fixed
routes, these routes being closely patrolled by British
cruisers ; the second, a dispersal of trade away from
the usual routes, thus taking advantage of the vast tracts
of ocean as a means of protection, and leaving British
cruisers free to hunt down enemy warships. The third
course consisted of either of the alternatives men-
tioned in association with convoy. That policy, how-
ever, would have involved a weakening of the offensive
action against the enemy in order to provide direct pro-
tection to shipping. Shipowners and masters were
generally opposed to a system of convoys, while naval
242 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
opinion as to its wisdom was divided. Reviewing the
situation broadly, and having regard to the limited number
of cruisers available for trade protection, the Admiralty
decided upon as wide a dispersal of ships as possible during
the period when enemy cruisers were being tracked down.
Orders were promulgated to the Mercantile Marine in
accordance with this decision through the channels of
communication then available at home and abroad.
In order to convey to the Mercantile Shipping the In-
structions, Route Orders, and Advice necessary to enable
vessels to navigate with the least possible risk, both from
direct enemy action and also from mines, a number of
Shipping Intelligence Officers were appointed at the prin-
l cipal commercial home ports, and the system was gradually
\ extended to other ports in the United Kingdom. These
\ officers were in direct touch with the Admiralty (Trade
\Division), and received instructions from time to time as to
y*outes to be followed, etc., while somewhat similar arrange-
jnents were made at ports abroad so that masters could
obtain the latest Admiralty instructions as to their routes
from reporting officers, who were usually Consular or
Colonial officers. As has already been pointed out, Lloyd's
and the War Risks Clubs were also used as channels
of communication where this was the most convenient
means, the existing channels being gradually co-ordinated
to form a rapid means of communication between the
Admiralty and the Mercantile Marine. The Board of
Customs and Excise likewise placed their entire organisa-
tions at the disposal of the Admiralty, and throughout the
war rendered invaluable assistance in the dissemination
of " Traffic Instructions " to merchant vessels. These
Traffic Instructions consisted principally of directions for
coastal voyages, which every vessel had to obtain from
the Customs Authorities at the port of departure im-
mediately before sailing. It is impossible to speak
too highly of the cordial support and co-operation re-
ceived by the Admiralty from the Board of Customs and
Excise.
Except on special short sea and coastal routes where
concentration of naval forces was possible, the convoy
system was not employed for merchant ships in the early
part of the war ; this was due partly to delays regarded
as inevitable with any system of convoy, and partly to
CH. v] THE POLICY OF DISPERSAL 243
the congestion which it was considered would have been
caused in British ports by the sudden entry of large
convoys ; but the chief obstacle, as already indicated,
was the lack of protective vessels. When the Admiralty
found themselves in a position to spare destroyers and
cruisers for convoy work, due to the increased output of
destroyers and the advent of the United States of America
into the war, the convoy system for overseas trade was
adopted, and gradually increased to include practically all
vessels trading to and from the United Kingdom. After
the system had become properly organised it was found
that delays in the voyages of ships were not in fact
greater than had been experienced by ships sailing indi-
vidually under war conditions, which entailed the periodi-
cal suspension of sailings in certain areas owing to enemy
activity, and the lengthening of voyages due to diversion
and the necessity for observance of Admiralty instructions
for the protection of merchant ships in the danger area.
Partly for the same reason, but mainly due to the sailing
of convoys at more frequent intervals as a greater number
of escort vessels became available, no appreciable difference
was experienced in the conditions obtaining at the principal
commercial ports for dealing with the cargoes of the ships
as they arrived.
In conformity with the Admiralty decision to adopt the
policy of dispersal, the Trade Division, on August 3rd,
sent out an instruction to Lloyd's and the War Risks
Clubs in the following terms :
" Advise British shipping to abandon regular tracks.
Complete voyages without bunkering, if possible; reduce
brilliancy of lights. Make use of territorial waters when
possible. Homeward-bound vessels call for orders at
any Signal-station on South coast of Devon or Cornwall,
or on South or North or West coasts of Ireland. Pass this
as far as possible to all British ships."
On the following day a short message in the same sense
was dispatched by cable or wireless telegraph to Lloyd's
agents in all parts of the world, numbering 265. Orders
of a somewhat more detailed character were issued simul-
taneously to all Intelligence Officers and Reporting Officers
to the following effect :
244 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
44 Advise British shipping to steer course parallel to
and from 80 to 150 miles distant from regular track.
Endeavour to fill up sufficiently with coal to avoid bunker-
ing on passage. Reduce brilliancy of lights. When
obliged to pass through localities where traffic is most con-
gested, endeavour to do so at night. Use neutral territorial
waters when possible. Homeward-bound vessels call for
orders at any Signal-station on South coast of Devon or
Cornwall, or on South, North, or West coasts of Ireland.
Pass this secretly by visual to any British ships met with."
During the succeeding week it became apparent that,
in spite of the action of the naval authorities and the cover
provided under the War Insurance scheme, some ships
were being held up. Further instructions to check this
development were decided upon on August 13th, and com-
municated to all British possessions and to His Majesty's
representatives and others throughout the world. After re-
commending that navigation lights should be extinguished
only when an immediate attack was apprehended, and
that, the danger passed, they should be relighted, the Ad-
miralty added that it was most important that British
trade should be interrupted as little as possible, and that
" British vessels should not be held up nor advised to
remain in port unless such a course should be deemed abso-
lutely necessary." A week later, an enemy armed merchant
cruiser having interfered with vessels south of the Canaries,
it was suggested to Lines using this route that, under the cir-
cumstances then existing, vessels should be directed where
possible to avoid passing the Canaries, and that in other
cases they should go well clear to the westward of those
islands, the exact distance depending upon the importance
of the voyage, the amount of coal available, and other
special considerations. " If ships are so diverted," it was
added, " it is considered that the chance of capture will
be considerably modified."
In spite of the action which the Admiralty had taken,
a feeling of nervousness in commercial circles still existed
owing to news of captures by the KONIGSBERG, DRESDEN,
KARLSRUHE, and KAISER WILHELM DER GROSSE. In order
to arrest anything approaching a feeling of panic as to the
danger on the trade routes, fresh instructions were issued
to the Intelligence Officers on August 29th, advising them
CH. v] " SEA IS FREE TO ALL " 245
not to hold up British shipping except for good reasons,
it being added that " the Government Insurance Scheme
provides for a small percentage of loss, and it is most
important to keep the trade moving, even if slight loss
is incurred." In further reference to the same tendency
to check the flow of shipping, and therefore of trade,
another telegram was dispatched on the following day to
all Naval, Indian, and Colonial authorities in the East.
Reference was made in that message to the continual
complaints received from shipowners as to their vessels
being detained, " especially in Far Eastern and Australian
waters," and it was added that the " essential trade of
the Empire should continue uninterrupted." The tele-
gram added that, " If vessels sail after dark, make good
offing, avoid regular tracks, danger of capture small.
Most essential impress this on all concerned. No ships
should ever be detained unless definite news of presence
enemy's cruisers in immediate vicinity." In order that
commercial communities throughout the Empire should
be in no doubt as to the policy which was being pursued
by the naval authorities, a statement was drawn up headed
44 Sea is free to all." It appeared in the newspapers on
September 3rd :
44 There appears to be an impression in shipping circles
that the Admiralty have prohibited the use of certain
trade routes for mercantile shipping. This is quite erro-
neous. The Admiralty policy is that the sea is free to
all. Any limitations which the Admiralty may advise are
intended solely to assist shipowners in safeguarding their
vessels, and no routes are prohibited.
44 Owing to the German policy of laying mines in waters
principally frequented by peaceful trading vessels, and
other threats to the safety of shipping, the Admiralty
have, in some cases, considered it advisable to warn ship-
owners that certain routes are exceptionally dangerous,
and are, therefore, not covered by the War Risks Insurance
scheme. But should the shipowners decide to use those
routes, there is no desire on the part of the Admiralty to
interfere with the shipowners' absolute discretion in the
matter."
By the following day the Trade Division was able tg
246 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
modify the advice previously given with reference to the
Canary Islands, since its information suggested that the
danger was not for the time so acute as formerly. Ship-
owners desirous of sending their vessels to the Canaries were
therefore informed that they could do so without undue risk.
Knowledge of the activities of the KARLSRUHE led the Trade
Division to issue an instruction to the effect that, in the
absence of definite news of the presence of enemy cruisers
in the vicinity of ports, ships should not be detained.
By these measures the Trade Division endeavoured to
give shipowners confidence to continue running their
vessels in order that the maritime trade of the Empire
might not be endangered during the critical period of the
transition from the conditions of peace to the conditions
of war. By the end of September, although in the mean-
time the EMDEN had made her appearance off Madras,
the War Staff was encouraged to issue a further instruc-
tion to His Majesty's representatives abroad. They were
advised that the experience of the first two months of
the war had shown that " no increase in the loss of merchant
shipping will be incurred by always keeping trade routes
open. When a hostile cruiser makes her presence known
by sending crews or prizes into port, she is unlikely to
remain on the same route ; short of closing all routes
for indefinite time, there is no remedy, as next point of
attack is matter for conjecture." It was also pointed out
that " the detention of insured vessels in port was ex-
tremely costly to owners and merchants, and if continued
defeats the object of Government Insurance Scheme.'*
That British representatives abroad might have confidence,
they were reminded that " vessels sailing after dark and
making good offing with dimmed lights run little chance
of capture." So insistent was the Trade Division on the
absolute necessity of checking any nervous action on
the part of British representatives abroad, that instruc-
tions were issued " that any detention of shipping should
at once be reported by cable." That instruction conveyed
to His Majesty's representatives an intimation that deten-
tion of shipping was to be regarded as justified only
in very exceptional circumstances, and that the policy
should not be adopted unless it became imperatively
necessary owing to local conditions. Similar warning
notices were sent through the Colonial Office to all self-
CH. v] AN ADMIRALTY MEMORANDUM 247
governing Dominions and to the principal Crown
Colonies.
In the meantime, the Trade Division had drawn up a
Memorandum in which it set forth the conclusions which
had been reached as to the best course to be adopted for
securing the safety of British shipping :
" The experience gained during the first two months of
war clearly proves that the most effective manner of
evading capture is by a complete abandonment of the
regular tracks. Closely associated with this is the neces-
sity for reducing the number of lights carried by vessels
at night to a minimum, and for dimming their brilliancy
as much as possible consistent with safety of navigation.
'4 Vessels should always endeavour to pass through focal
areas at night.
44 When leaving a port in the vicinity of which an enemy
cruiser is suspected of operating, the departure should
be made soon after dark, the intention to sail being kept as
secret as possible. A good offing should be made during
the night, care being taken to be well off the usual route
at daylight.
44 Similarly, it is advisable to make a port at or just
before daylight, thus insuring that the usual route is only
approached in the dark, and at the latest possible moment.
44 Masters should be warned, when abandoning a track,
to make sure that such deviation does not place them on
other routes. Neglect of this precaution has been the
immediate cause of at least three captures in the Atlantic.
*4 In the case of the EMDEN'S recent captures in Indian
waters, two main features present themselves :
44 (1) So far as can be ascertained at present, the vessels
themselves, when captured, were adhering very closely
to the usual trade routes.
44 (2) No attempt seems to have been made by the vessels
in the way of obscuring 'lights, or of otherwise avoiding
capture.
44 (The only exception seems to have been the Gryfevale,
which made a practice of putting out her lights. This
vessel, however, was captured during daylight, but it is
satisfactory to know that she was released.)
14 The EMDEN was thus enabled to effect more captures
in Indian waters in the space of a few days than all
248 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. T
the German cruisers in the Atlantic have hitherto
made.
" Trade routes in the Indian Ocean are admittedly
somewhat more constricted than in the Atlantic, but a
divergence of 100 miles from the normal course would have
probably ensured safety, except in the case of three vessels
captured near ports.
" Several reports which have reached the Admiralty of
late point to the fact that the comparatively small number
of captures is inducing some masters to return more nearly
to the usual trade routes.
" Masters should be constantly reminded that the
farther from the trade routes, the greater will be the
safety ; this will continue throughout the war.
" Wireless communication should be reduced to a mini-
mum, and the vessel's position and future movements
should always be kept secret.
44 It is assumed that no vessel carries any enemy subject
as part of her crew, and that no enemy subjects are em-
ployed in any capacity by owners whose vessels are
covered by the Government Insurance Scheme.
" It is pointed out that even one spy in a vessel would
most seriously compromise the secrecy of instructions upon
which the safety of British shipping so largely depends."
This Memorandum was immediately given wide cir-
culation among His Majesty's diplomatic representatives
and Reporting Officers in British Dominions, Colonies, and
Protectorates.
The Trade Division, in spite of all the action which had
been taken, was still not fully satisfied, in view of the
day-to-day reports which reached it, that its policy was
clearly understood. So, on October 26th, further instruc-
tions were issued all over the world as to the necessity of
keeping open the trade routes. At that time the KARLS-
RUHE and EMDEN were busy, the former off Pernambuco
and the latter off Minikoi. " It is undesirable," it was
remarked, 4t that vessels on passage should be directed
to converge on focal points such as Colombo or Singapore
merely for orders, and unless absolutely necessary. Ship-
ping must be more scattered off the routes, and where a
choice of passages exists, this should be taken full advantage
of. As enemy is evidently aware of present scattering
CH. v] INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS 249
limits, substitute general order that vessels must scatter
widely both sides of usual track, so that distribution of
shipping shall be as effective as possible. Instructions
by Reporting or Intelligence Officers should, wherever
possible, be handed to the masters in writing, and a record
of such instructions should be kept. Masters must be
warned to destroy these instructions if in danger of capture.
Colours are no indication of nationality until the vessel
opens fire. It must, therefore, be impressed on all masters
that measures should be taken to avoid vessels directly
they, or their smoke, are sighted. All lights except
Navigation Lights should be hidden, and Navigation
Lights should not exceed brilliancy laid down in Rules
for Prevention of Collisions at Sea. The second mast-
head light is unnecessary." On the following day instruc-
tions of a very similar character were issued to His Majesty's
representatives in the areas chiefly affected by the opera-
tions of enemy ships. An additional paragraph suggested
that an endeavour should be made to advise British
shipping secretly of the best measures of evading capture
by hostile vessels.
At the opening of the new year the naval situation
changed for the better, the KRONPRINZ WILHELM, PRINZ
EITEL FRIEDRICH, and the DRESDEN being the only enemy
vessels known then to be at large. In the meantime,
shipowners had made complaints that merchant vessels
had been captured very shortly after official advice had
been given that certain routes were " safe " or *' clear." In
a telegram to Intelligence Officers at the ports most affected,
the Trade Division remarked that such statements could
only be personal opinions, which might be formed on
unavoidably imperfect information. " These and similar
expressions should never Ipe used J)y anyone sgiving advice
or instructions as to routes. They imply assurances of
security which are obviously impossible in war-time ;
this tends to discredit the value of Admiralty advice.
Events have proved that such statements may be mis-
leading, may cause relaxation of the vigilance which is
so essential, and may -cause serious disaster. Advice
should be confined to statement of facts as to course to
steer and similar matters. Any helpful information should
be given which does not disclose our plans or the position
of our own war-vessels."
250 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. v
While the Trade Division was advising and shepherding
the Merchant Navy during these early days of the war,
the Operations Division of the War Staff, under Rear-
Admiral Arthur C. Leveson, was also busy in its own
particular sphere. The Operations Division was charged
with taking a wide survey of the naval situation, and close
touch was maintained between it and the Intelligence and
Trade Divisions. From August 5th onwards, the Trade
Division was in a position to issue daily voyage notices,1
specifying the passages forbidden under the War Insurance
Scheme in view of the Admiralty's knowledge of the enemy's
actions and probable plans. The character of the services
which this branch of the War Staff rendered in this respect
may best be illustrated by the " daily voyage notice " of
August 5th, in which passages were forbidden to the
Baltic, to the North Sea Continental ports east and north
of Dunkirk, the North Atlantic, from Canadian ports
and ports of the United States as far south as, but not
including, Philadelphia, and trade on the North Pacific
coast. It would be tedious and unnecessary to trace the
gradual development of this work during succeeding
months as the British naval authorities gained a fuller
appreciation of the situation. It may be of interest,
however, to give by way of contrast the daily voyage
notice which was issued on the last day of 1914 :
" For the purposes of the Government War Insurance
scheme, the Admiralty consider all voyages may be
undertaken subject to local conditions, except the follow-
ing:
" (1) All ports in Belgium, Holland, Denmark, and Ger-
many.
" (2), All ports in Sweden, except Gothenburg.
" (3) All Russian Baltic ports.
" (4) Adriatic, North of Viesti.
" (5) All Black Sea and Turkish ports.
" Note 1. — Vessels from the Atlantic bound to Gothen-
burg or Norwegian ports are required to call at a port
in the United Kingdom for orders, before proceeding to
destination.
" Note 2. — Owners whose ships are trading to and from
1 The daily voyage notices subsequently became known as " Standing
Orders under the Government War Insurance Scheme."
CH. v] PRECAUTIONS INSISTED ON 251
Norwegian ports or Gothenburg should send a representa-
tive to the Trade Division, Admiralty, for special instruc-
tions.
"Note 3. — A mine area exists between lat. 51° 15' N.
and 51° 40' N., and between long. 1° 35' E. and 3° E.
" Note 4. — Vessels trading to Gothenburg and Norwegian
ports are warned that it is unlawful to carry goods that
are contraband of war or the export of which is prohibited,
unless they have a licence from the Privy Council to do so.
Very serious consequences may ensue if vessels knowingly
carry such cargo.
" Note 5. — The route along the East Coast is now open.
When passing coast between Filey Brig and Scarborough,
vessels must do so during daylight only. They must
keep as close to the shore as possible, and must pass to
the westward of the position 1 J miles E. by S. Scarborough
Rock and 1 mile N.E. J E. Filey Brig Buoy.
" Note 6. — No Atlantic traffic is to pass round North of
Ireland until further orders."
With the rounding up of the enemy's cruisers and
armed merchantmen, a feeling of security began to in-
fluence shipowners and masters. It was assumed by some
of them that no further trouble was to be apprehended,
and that the precautions hitherto observed might there-
fore be disregarded. The Trade Division considered it
desirable to check without delay the growth of any such
idea. They let it be known that " the suggestion that
certain routes are now safe, and that vessels can safely
follow the usual route, is a most dangerous one, and should
be combated whenever it is mooted, either formally or in
conversation." It was pointed out that it would never
be known from day to day when German vessels might
break out through the North Sea and appear suddenly upon
the great trade routes. The shipping interest was re-
minded that the surest way of encouraging such raids
was to let it be generally known that precautions had been
relaxed : "If precautions are in any way relaxed, enor-
mous losses might be inflicted on trade in a few days
before we were even aware that raiders had escaped."
Wise as these precautions were, experience was to show
that the Admiralty credited the enemy with a greater
degree of enterprise than he had, in fact, any intention
252 PROTECTION OF SHIPPING [CH. *
of exhibiting. During the whole of March, only two
vessels were destroyed by enemy surface vessels — the
Tamar (3,207 tons) on the 25th, and the Coleby (3,824
tons) two days later, both by the KRONPRINZ WILHELM
and both off Pernambuco. These two incidents marked
the end of the enemy's cruiser warfare, and in subsequent
months the Admiralty's main preoccupation was the
protection of merchant shipping against submarine
attacks.
CHAPTER VI
THE ORGANISATION OF THE AUXILIARY PATROL
IT may be said of the Admiralties of the world, even
those responsible for ocean commerce on a large scale,
that none foresaw the course which the war by sea would
take, and consequently there was a good deal of hasty
improvisation to meet its needs, particularly on the part
of the Entente navies, which had to keep open the maritime
communications of armies and peoples. For ten years
or more attention had been directed almost exclusively
to the building of big men-of-war, battleships, and battle
cruisers ; and in 1914 the number of small craft — light
cruisers, destroyers, and torpedo-boats — possessed by the
Great Powers, not excluding Germany and Austria-Hun-
gary, was relatively small. That was a matter of slight
importance to the enemy, because he relinquished, almost
from the first, all attempt to use the sea for military or
economic purposes ; but it would have proved a grave
embarrassment to the Entente Powers if they had not
had a reserve, to be called upon as required, consisting
of the unconsidered and uncatalogued latent elements of
naval power possessed by the British people with ancient sea
traditions. Because it was responsible for protecting about
half the ocean tonnage of the world, and was better pro-
vided with small craft than the French or Italian navies,
the burden of sea command bore mainly on the British
Fleet throughout the war. It had not been foreseen that
it would be necessary to organise what at length reached
the proportions of a second fleet under Admiralty control,
consisting of craft which were never intended for the
violence of warfare, but when the need arose it was met
with complete success.
There had been no intention of making heavy demands
upon the ships or men of the Mercantile Marine, though
253
254 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
the Admiralty was prepared to take up a limited number
of steamships for use as store, ammunition, and hospital
ships, while other vessels were held available for employ-
ment as auxiliary cruisers and transports. The necessity
for organising a great auxiliary fleet would not have
arisen, or, at any rate, it would not have assumed such
large proportions as it did assume, had it not been for
the enemy's decision to dispatch submarines to attack
merchant shipping. That policy was an afterthought.
It is hardly too much to say that before the outbreak
of war no naval officer, whatever his nationality,
seriously contemplated the possibility of vessels being
used for attacking ocean-borne commerce which could
not supply prize crews or make provision, in case the
prize was destroyed, for the safety of the crew as well as
passengers, if passengers were carried. For a number of
years torpedo-boats, swift and carrying guns as well as
torpedoes, had been in commission, but it had never been
suggested that these small vessels, the forerunners of the
submarines, should be pressed into such service, because
it was realised that such a departure involved the in-
fraction of the generally-accepted law of nations, and, if
human life was lost, the flouting of the dictates of hu-
manity. The Germans themselves entertained no such
proposal. When the submarine appeared and proved its
efficiency, no idea was held of converting it into an in-
strument for attacking commerce, as is proved by the fact
that in the summer of 1914 the enemy possessed only
twenty-eight completed vessels of this type. If any such
scheme had been determined upon as part of the war plans
of the Germans, many more submarines would certainly
have been in readiness to be thrown into the war when the
struggle by sea opened. It was not until after the British
cruisers HOGUE, CRESS Y, and ABOUKIR had been sunk
by U9, and the German flag had been banished from
the outer seas, that the idea was conceived that, if men-of-
war, armed and armoured and with highly trained crews,
could be so easily destroyed as experience had shown,
submarines should be employed against unarmed merchant-
men, manned by crews unfamiliar with war conditions.
That determination on the part of the enemy, reached
in the late autumn of 1914, vitally affected the naval
situation as it had been studied by the British naval
CH. vi] A SUPPLEMENTARY FLEET 255
authorities in pre-war days. It forced them to assume an
added responsibility, as unexpected as it was embarrassing.
The Fleet had been organised to take its part in surface
warfare ; within a few months it had to adapt itself to a
new form of warfare, pursued by the enemy with determina-
tion, with vessels capable of operating below the surface.
In conjunction with the appearance of the submarine
the enemy's resort to indiscriminate mining changed the
character of the British naval problem, and thus it came
about that gradually a supplementary fleet was evolved —
the Auxiliary Patrol. It eventually consistted of a great
assemblage of small vessels of varied types — trawlers,
whalers, drifters, steam-yachts, paddle-steamers, motor-
launches, and motor-boats. Those vessels were manned by
merchant seamen, fishermen, yachtsmen, and naval en-
thusiasts drawn promiscuously from the coast and inland
towns and villages, from counting-house and shop and
factory. Few persons before the war imagined that the
stately white enamelled yachts seen in the Solent during
Cowes Week would one day be painted grey, and, mounting
guns fore and aft, would be commissioned under the White
Ensign to hunt German submarines and assist in patrolling
the ocean highways. Certainly the fishermen of the North
Sea, the Irish Sea, and the English Channel did not fore-
see that they would spend several of the best years of
their lives in sweeping up German mines and assuring the
safety of merchant shipping from a deadly peril, besides
assisting to bring to the British Isles the food and raw
material required by the crowded population. Similarly,
none of the yachtsmen who sought service under the
Admiralty later dreamed that the summer cruises which
they had been accustomed to make would furnish sea
training and sea experience to fit them to take a foremost
part in the world war. And yet, owing to the force
of circumstances, this apparently miscellaneous collection
of ships and men was to be welded together into a great
disciplined force which bore no mean share of the burden
of the war by sea during the whole of the long period
covered by hostilities.
It was because the Royal Navy was so powerful that
it needed these small ships, claiming them as necessary
auxiliaries, arming them and sending them to sea in all
weathers to fight the enemy and to assist in protecting
18
256 1 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. VI
the supreme weapon — the Grand Fleet — on which the
fortunes of war mainly depended. Owing to the prepon-
derating strength of the Grand Fleet over the High Sea
Fleet, the enemy, thrown back on the defensive, decided to
rely almost exclusively on two methods of offence, the mine
and, afterwards, the submarine. They constituted deadly
perils, not only to ships of commerce, but to men-of-war,
and it was realised from the first that battleships, battle
cruisers, and light cruisers were unsuited to offer an
adequate defence against such instruments of warfare. A
battleship or cruiser carries too many lives in her vul-
nerable hull, is too costly to build, is too difficult to re-
place, and has too great a turning circle, to engage in
harrying, chasing, and sinking submarines. Destroyers
were admirably suited to the work, but they were required
as screens for the battle and cruiser squadrons, and the
British Navy, in common with the other Allied navies,
was short of these small craft. It soon became apparent
that the Navy must have assistance, and, once the need
was recognised, it was met by one of the most remarkable
voluntary movements for which the war was responsible.
The unexpected development of the enemy's naval policy
suggested the employment in this service of the steam-
yacht, the paddle-steamer with its moderate draught,
the motor- vessel, the drifter, and the trawler, thus utilising
in fighting at sea the tonnage of the country which in normal
times was used either in the pursuit of pleasure or in the
fisheries. Fishing vessels were admirably adapted to meet
the Navy's urgent requirements, carrying small crews,
being handy in a seaway, drawing little water, and being
cheap to build. These were the ships which were con-
sequently taken up soon after the outbreak of war, fitted
out, and placed on duty in the waters surrounding the
British Isles. On these vessels devolved the duty of
examining and controlling millions of tons of shipping
passing through the narrow seas ; day by day they swept
channels of safety, destroying thousands of mines in the
process; they encircled the British Isles with their ever-
vigilant patrol, in fog and in storm, in summer and in
winter ; they escorted merchant ships, warning them
from dangerous areas ; they towed torpedoed vessels
into safety ; they sent enemy submarines to their
doom by ramming, shelling, dropping explosives, or
CH. vi] MINE-SWEEPING EXPERIMENTS 257
other means. These auxiliary craft proved the salvation
of the Royal Navy as of the Merchant Fleet. Gradually
the sphere of operations of the Auxiliary Patrol was ex-
tended as far north as the White Sea, as far south as the
Mediterranean and JSgean, and as far west as the West
Indies. Wherever these vessels were employed, their
officers and men performed redoubtable service in the
common cause. They were the heroes of some of the most
gallant exploits in naval history, as was attested by the
long list of decorations won in unequal contests against
the mine and submarine. The story of the part taken in
the naval war by the Auxiliary Patrol, consisting of nearly
4,000 vessels and manned by nearly 50,000 officers and
men, constitutes a chapter in our naval annals of im-
perishable renown. It is a story which proves that
the British seaman, even in the days of highly developed
mechanically-driven ships, has nothing to fear by com*
parison with the standards of the golden age of the sailing-
ship. Side by side with the personal achievements of the
seamen, an endeavour will be made to show how a fortuitous
and unorganised assemblage of shipping, with crews un-
disciplined to the demands of war, developed into what
was in effect a supplementary navy.
When the war broke out in August 1914, a modest
organisation was already in existence for the employment
of fishing craft under the White Ensign, which enabled
trawlers to be dispatched within a few hours to sweep
up the first minefield laid by the enemy off our coast.
In 1907 Admiral Lord Charles Beresford was Com-
mander-in- Chief of the Channel Fleet, with his flag in the
KING EDWARD VII. For some time past he had been
concerned with the best method of clearing a channel for
a battle-fleet leaving harbour during strained relations or
in time of war. When earlier he had been Commander-
in- Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet he had tried sweeping
experiments with tugs and destroyers, but both classes of
vessels were found to be unsuitable. Whilst on a visit to
Grimsby he saw about 800 trawlers congregated in the
harbour. He inspected some of them, and talked with
the skippers. Here were men accustomed to deal with
trawl-ropes and trawls, the equivalent to mine-sweeps.
These fishermen were so expert at their work that they
never fouled their screws with the wire ropes, and their
258 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
ships were fitted with steam winches and all the necessary
gear required for sweeping. What could be more suitable
than these ships and men for mine-sweeping ? In July
1907 he therefore suggested to the Admiralty that a trial
should be made with these craft, and, further, that, if suc-
cessful, a certain number of trawlers should be requisitioned
for the different ports so as to be ready for service when the
period of strained relations with a foreign Power arrived.
In response to this suggestion, the Admiralty approved
of Lord Charles making a practical test. At the begin-
ning of the following year, Commander E. L. Booty of the
KING EDWARD VII was sent to Grimsby, where he selected
two typical steam trawlers, the Andes and Algoma. They
reached Portland on February 5th, with their skippers
and crews of nine apiece ; and for the next eight days
they proceeded to sweep up dummy mines. The trials
were carried out under the supervision of a Channel
Fleet Mining Committee, of which Captain F. C. D.
Sturdee,1 then commanding officer of the NEW ZEALAND,
was President. Associated with him were Captain
R. F. Phillimore and two torpedo lieutenants, together
with a mining expert from the VERNON. The Committee
reported that the experiments had proved sufficiently satis-
factory to justify the taking up of trawlers for service in
war, to assist in keeping clear the approaches to harbours
that were likely to be mined. Lord Charles Beresford
stated in his report that the trawlers would prove in-
valuable for sweeping duties, as the crews had been accus-
tomed to earning their livelihood by this class of work.
Skippers and crews had entered into the trials with both
enthusiasm and delight ; as to the trawlers themselves,
their shape and build rendered sweeping easy, and prac-
tically no additional gear was required. In other words,
a trawler with its crew, when ready to proceed to the
fishing-grounds, was equally prepared for mine-sweeping.
As these trials actually brought about the creation of
the mine-sweeping service, which rendered such gallant
assistance throughout the war, it may be not out of place
to set down the details of the Andes and Algoma. They
measured 105 feet in length, 21 feet beam, with a draught
of 13 feet aft and about 9 feet forward. Their speed was
8j knots ; i.h.p. 240, and they carried 80 tons of coal,
1 Afterwards Admiral Sir Doveton Sturdee.
CH. vi] RESULTS OF THE TRIALS 259
having an expenditure of five to six tons a day. Each
trawl warp consisted of 250 fathoms of 3-inch wire, and
at first the trawlers' own otter-boards were used as kites,
though later, after further experiments, the right size and
type of kite for mine-sweeping was evolved. The crew in
each case consisted of skipper, mate, third hand, two deck
hands, steward, chief engineer, second engineer, and
trimmer. After the outbreak of war, when fishing trawlers
became His Majesty's ships, the Admiralty made the
fewest possible modifications in the personnel and the
running of these vessels.
The result of the experiments at Portland was to con-
vince the Admiralty that trawlers could be depended on
to clear a channel with practically only their own resources.
One distinguished officer, Captain Bernard Currey (after-
wards Director of Naval Ordnance), pointed out that they
would be indispensable in war-time as an Auxiliary Sweep-
ing Service, and suggested the desirability of preparing
a contract with the trawler-owners so as to enable a
number of these craft to be taken up on the Approach of
war. With this suggestion Captain E. J. W. Slade,1 then
Director of Naval Intelligence, concurred, and he further
emphasised the fact that trawls were obviously more
efficiently worked by men accustomed to their use than
by untrained crews. The solution of the manning problem,
therefore, appeared to lie in employing Royal Naval
Reserve men, of whom a large number were fishermen.
The proposal was approved by Admiral Sir John Fisher,
the First Sea Lord.
On August 1st, 1908, five months afterwards, an im-
portant Mining Committee was formed at the Admiralty
under the presidency of Rear- Admiral G. A. Callaghan to
consider the general question of mine-laying and mine-
clearing. It was evident to anyone able to read the signs
of the times that war with Germany was sooner or later
possible, and that mines might play no inconsiderable
part in the enemy's operations. Hitherto the method of
destroying a minefield was to countermine. But after
going into the matter very carefully, the Committee recom-
mended that a mine-sweeping service should be instituted
in lieu of countermining ; that the wire-sweep should be
adopted ; that 6-foot kites should be used for small craft,
1 Afterwards Admiral Sir Edmond J. W. Slade.
260 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
and 9-foot kites, or even 12-foot, for larger craft. They
further suggested that six trawlers should be purchased
immediately for experimental and instructional service,
and that trawler-owners should be approached by the
Admiralty to ascertain if they could provide crews in peace-
time for instruction, as well as in war-time for sweeping
mines.
Little time was wasted, for by the middle of August
both Sir John Fisher and the First Lord, Mr. Reginald
McKenna, had approved of six trawlers being obtained
(two for each of the three Torpedo Schools) in order to
enable instruction in mine-sweeping to proceed without
delay. There was still much to be learnt in regard to the
best types of kites and the most suitable wires, and, further-
more, officers and men required a certain amount of in-
struction. The urgency of the matter arose from the
fact that foreign Powers were known to be increasing the
numbers of their blockade mines. There was the conse-
quential danger that at the outbreak of war the British
Fleet might be taken by surprise, blockaded by mine-
fields, and unable to emerge from its bases.
In spite of the urgency of the matter, there followed
some delay in obtaining financial sanction for the pur-
chase of these trawlers ; but in the Naval Estimates for
1909-10 this was provided for. In March 1910 Mr.
McKenna stated that during the year great attention had
been paid to mine-sweeping, and that six trawlers had
been bought for " subsidiary services." More than this
was not revealed publicly, as there was a desire to keep all
mine-sweeping details secret. The first four trawlers were
purchased in April 1909, their names being the Spider,
Sparrow, Seaflower, and Seamew. From this date prac-
tice and experimental work in mine-sweeping were carried
out continuously, and the results were eminently satis-
factory. In December it was decided to allocate the
Sparrow and Spider to the VERNON at Portsmouth, the
Seamew and Seaflower to the ACTION at the Nore, whilst
the two others still to be bought were to be attached to
the DEFIANCE at Devonport. But from June to the end
of September every year these six trawlers were to be
used for visiting the fishing ports and training ratings.
The Admiralty having obtained these trawlers, the
next step was to secure the personnel. It was necessary
CH. vi] NAVAL OFFICERS TRAINED 261
to detail naval officers to take charge of the units of
trawlers when sweeping, but a difficulty arose. In the
first place there were very few officers who had experi-
ence of sweeping, and it was clear that in time of war
every available officer on the active list would be required
for service in the Royal Navy. The difficulty was met
when it was decided, early in 1910, to detail and train
certain officers on the emergency and retired lists for this
special purpose. At the outset twenty-two lieutenants
or commanders were required, each of whom in time of
war would command a unit consisting of six trawlers.
Of those who were invited, about twenty commanders
and lieutenants accepted the call and underwent a fourteen
days' course in the VERNON. This was soon followed by
another course for an additional number, and thus a fairly
big nucleus of trained officers became available. These
details of organisation were arranged none too early.
Since the year 1906, Germany had been expending large
sums of money on the construction of mine-layers, the
manufacture of mines, and the training of officers and
men in mine-laying. The Russo-Japanese War had
shown the value of mines, for no fewer than thirty-seven
craft, from battleships to picket-boats, had struck mines,
and there were also losses to merchant shipping.
Officers for the units having been obtained, the next
step was to get together a special section of the Royal
Naval Reserve, to be known as the Trawler Section, which
would man these craft. Men were not to be drawn from
the existing Royal Naval Reserve, as obviously such a
step would interfere with the manning of some of the
bigger ships in time of war. The regulations for this
Trawler Section were drawn up in October 1910. It
was decided to retain for the men their existing titles
of ranks and ratings — " Skipper," " Second-hand," and
so on. The pay was based on the wages normally ob-
taining in the trawling industry, but about 20 per cent,
lower. The skipper was to be given the rank of a
warrant officer ; it was determined that he must have
commanded a trawler for at least two years, possess a
Board of Trade certificate, and before receiving the
Admiralty warrant must undergo eight days' training in
one of His Majesty's steam trawlers.
The slack season in the trawling trade occurs immedi-
262 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
ately after Lent, especially between June and September,
and the decision was made that the training season
should coincide with the slack season as far as possible.
The first enrolment of fishermen for the Royal Naval
Reserve (T.) was postponed until the beginning of 1911,
when the Admiralty endeavoured to obtain fifty skippers
and fifty second-hands. The training was to be
carried out on board the six trawlers now attached to
the Torpedo Schools, the names of the recently-added
pair being the Rose and Driver, attached to Devonport.
For the commencement of this training Aberdeen was
selected, and there the six Admiralty trawlers were to
assemble, together with H.M.S. JASON and CIRCE, those
two gunboats having been selected by reason of the
training and experience of their commanding officers in
mine-sweeping. The first course at Aberdeen began on
January 30, 1911, and ended by the middle of April,
during which time twenty-eight skippers, twenty-seven
second-hands, twenty deck-hands, twenty-one engineers,
and twenty trimmers, had been recruited and trained.
Thus the first batch of the Trawler Reserve was ob-
tained. Commander Holland of the CIRCE afterwards
reported that the class of men enrolled was very good,
and much better than had been expected; they all
took very keen interest in their work, and were amenable
to discipline. The eight days' instruction included
sweeping independently in pairs, reeving sweeps, wheeling
and slipping the sweep, sweeping up dummy mines, and
so on.
At the beginning of April recruiting began at Grimsby,
but the results were by no means encouraging. Not more
than a dozen men volunteered, and not one of these was
a skipper. There was no disguising the fact that Grimsby,
which had been the birthplace of this Trawler Reserve
scheme, and was also the home of the great fishing industry,
showed itself very far from enthusiastic. There was
something not quite as it should be. What was it ?
Anyone acquainted with these rough, hearty fishermen
knows that in many ways they are just delightful big
children. If one man " throws his hand in," practically
the whole crew will do the same. The trouble in this
case began with the skippers, some of whom made what
the seaman calls " a bit of a moan " over some apparent
CH. vi] DIFFICULTIES OVERCOME 263
injustice. Most of their companions took up the same
attitude, and the result was failure. It is only fair to
state that there were defects in the scheme, which, con-
sidering its novelty, was scarcely surprising. For instance,
the Admiralty had made the age limit for skippers twenty-
five to thirty- five. The Grimsby men objected to this as
being too young, seeing that the best skippers in the port
were much older than thirty-five. Another grievance
was that the pay was not attractive. The Admiralty
were quick to see where the trouble lay, and a number of
modifications were devised to meet the difficulty. It
was afterwards possible to smile at all this, since
throughout the long war which was to follow no men
did more gallant and persevering service in the mine-
fields and on patrol than the Grimsby skippers and
Grimsby crews. These men revealed themselves as no
sea-lawyers, but the bravest of the brave. Time after
time a Grimsby trawler foundered on a mine, and the
first thing that the sole survivor did on getting back to
his port was to sign on for a mine-sweeping job. And as
to the skippers' ages — well, many of the best men were of
the same age as some of the best Admirals !
Down to the autumn of 1911 the recruiting and training
went on. In addition to Aberdeen and Grimsby, the
fishing ports of Hull, Fleetwood, and Milford were visited.
From these there were obtained 52 skippers, 94 second-
hands, 198 deck-hands, 88 enginemen, and 94 trimmers ; a
total of 526.
This was the nucleus of what was to develop into a
great Auxiliary Navy. But it was patent that its useful-
ness would depend very considerably on the rapidity
with which it could be mobilised at the time of war's
approach. The sphere of utility for these trawlers, as
conceived in the mind of the Admiralty, was not to act
as fleet sweepers — that is, sweeping ahead of the Grand
Fleet. For this purpose the trawlers were too slow of
speed, and a number of old gunboats were already ear-
marked for that duty. But it was for clearing the
entrances to harbours and fairways that the trawlers were
to be relied on. The moment war was declared the enemy
might lay his mines off the entrances to our East Coast
ports ; perhaps he would not even wait for the declara-
tion of war. Unless ships were to be either blown up or
264 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
virtually blockaded, sweepers must be ready to work
almost at once.
The Admiralty realised in November of this same year
that there should be appointed for each of these trawler-
ports a mobilising officer, whose duty was laid down.
Just before the outbreak of war this officer would, on
receipt of a telegram ordering him to take up his mobilisa-
tion appointment, proceed to his assigned port. There
he would receive in due course another telegram ordering
him to take up so many trawlers, call on the Registrar of
the Royal Naval Reserve for that port, and warn him to
prepare crews for these craft. The Registrar of Shipping
and Seamen would furnish the mobilising officer with a list
of the trawlers in port, or likely to arrive very shortly.
Arrangements would be made to have these craft prepared
for sea, coaled, and filled up with water, oil, and provisions
to last seven days. The owners were to take out all the
fish, the ice, and the fishing-gear, excepting the warps.
Having selected from the available trawlers those which
were suitable, the mobilising officer was to give the skippers
their charts and sailing orders, and away they would sail
to their port. Having proceeded thither at full speed,
the trawler's skipper would then draw his special sweep-
ing stores, such as his kite, White Ensign, flags, cone,
and signal book, and be informed to which group of
sweepers he was to belong, as well as the name of the
parent ship of the officer in charge of his group. He
would also be given a number, which was to be painted
n white figures two feet long on each bow, and his ship
would in future be known officially by that number.
His fishing letters and number were to be painted out. A
naval petty officer would also join the trawler in order
to assist the skipper with advice, especially in purely
naval matters, in signalling and keeping accounts ; and this
petty officer would be third in command. By this time
the ship would also have been painted a navy grey and
be flying the White Ensign ; she would, in fact, have
changed her character from that of a peaceful fisherman
to a man-of-war.
Mention must not be omitted of the arrangement
which had been made, also prior to the war, between the
Admiralty and the trawler-owners. It was realised that
in the event of hostilities the fishing industry would,
CH. vi] ARRANGEMENT WITH THE OWNERS 265
except in certain areas removed from the theatre of
operations, automatically stop ; that the trawlers would
have to remain in port, and therefore the owners would
cease to receive dividends. The Admiralty scheme, by
taking over these vessels in war-time at a certain rate of
hire, was to be considered as offering a sound business
proposition. Before the war an arrangement existed
between certain owners and the naval authorities whereby
such vessels would be chartered in priority of any other
trawlers in the event of hostilities. The owners agreed that
as soon as possible after receipt of notice they would hire
their vessels to the Navy upon terms which had already
been arranged. The payment in respect of hire was to
be 12 per cent, per annum on the then value of the trawler.
The first cost was to be ascertained by valuing the hull
and outfit at £18 per ton of the gross tonnage on the
Board of Trade certificate, and the machinery and boilers
at £40 per nominal horse-power. This estimated first
cost was to be depreciated at the rate of 4 per cent, for
every year of the trawler's age ; the class of vessel aimed
at was craft not more than ten years old, and able to
carry enough coal to steam at least 1,000 miles at 8 knots.
In the month of March 1912, a number of retired naval
officers were selected to take charge of mine-sweeping
trawlers at Sheerness, the Firth of Forth, Dover, Ports-
mouth, Portland, Devonport, and Milford. As soon as
these officers should receive a telegram ordering them to
mobilise, they were to proceed to their respective ports.
They were not, of course, the mobilising officers, but were
to go to sea in charge of their respective groups of sweepers.
In July of that year a further number were also selected
as mobilising officers at Aberdeen, Hull, Grimsby, Milford
Haven, North Shields, Granton (near Leith), and Fleet-
wood ; and, in order to leave no loophole for misunder-
standings, these officers were required to undergo an
annual course of three days at their appointed ports with
a view to getting in touch with the Registrars of the Royal
Naval Reserve, the local harbour authorities, and trawler-
owners, and in order to become acquainted generally with
the docks and locality. Prior to these three days, they
were to visit the Admiralty for one day each year
in order to confer with the Inspecting Captain of Mine-
sweeping.
266 THE AUXILIARY PATROL [CH. vi
It will be seen with what meticulous care the Navy had
prepared against one particular form of warfare which it
was suspected the enemy would pursue. For years these
preparations had continued, but they were not complete.
In September of 1912 another stage was reached, when
an allocation of mine-sweeping trawlers was made right
away down the coast from Scotland along the North Sea,
down the Channel, up the Irish Sea to Milford Haven, and
even as far west as Queenstown. In November there were
sixty-four trawlers on the Admiralty list, each allocated to
one of these ports, each with its skipper and crew trained
for sweeping, and with a naval officer ready to take
charge of a group whenever ordered to leave his retire-
ment and go to sea. The crew was to consist of the
skipper, second-hand, four deck-hands, two enginemen,
and one trimmer, in addition to one naval petty officer,
whose knowledge of signalling would be found not the
least useful of his qualifications.
By August 1914 the Trawler Section had so far ad-
vanced that there were already eighty-two trawlers under
the above arrangement, to be based on Cromarty, the Firth
of Forth, North Shields, the Humber, Harwich, the
Nore, Dover, Portsmouth, Portland, and Devonport.
In addition to these eighty-two fishing trawlers, there
were, of course, the six Admiralty-owned trawlers already
mentioned, as well as the surveying trawlers Esther and
Daisy which appeared in the Navy List, for some years
before the war, as surveying-vessels. It was intended
that on the outbreak of war these two should sweep at the
Nore, but as soon as they were relieved by hired trawlers
they were to proceed, the one to Harwich and the other
to the Humber. Thus the commanding officers of both
the Daisy and Esther were each able to take charge of a
unit of detached trawlers.
The Admiralty also owned the trawlers Javelin, Jasper,
Janus, and had chartered some time prior to the war the
trawlers Alnmouth, Xylopia, Daniel Stroud, and Osborne
Stroud. These had been employed in peace-time in tow-
ing targets, and were at that period commanded by war-
rant officers of the Royal Navy. Nor was the Admiralty
ignorant of the mining preparations which Germany had
been making stealthily and determinedly during the
years of peace. It was known that practically every
CH. vi] READY FOR WAR 267
German man-of-war, from battleship to torpedo-boat,
had been fitted to carry mines ; and for a long time the
personnel of the German torpedo- craft had been trained
in mine-laying. It was known, also, -that our future enemy
possessed over 10,000 mines, chiefly of the horned type,
ready to be scattered at our very doors at the earliest
moment. The naval authorities were prepared for this.
On the other hand, whilst it was realised that the mine
would be a serious menace, no one could have foreseen
that it would usurp to itself, in conjunction with the sub-
marine, the task of carrying out the main operations of
the enemy by sea.
Such, then, was the situation at the outbreak of hos-
tilities. The country possessed a defensive organisation
when the first act of warfare by sea occurred in the laying
of the minefield off the Suffolk coast by the enemy. This
organisation had taken just seven years to create and
to perfect. During those years great difficulties had been
overcome, for unsuspected obstacles were continually arising.
To have created a mine-sweeping fleet ready for service
as a reserve force with a minimum of cost to the country
was indeed no mean achievement. It is not possible to
realise how shipping could have gone up and down the
North Sea as it did during the first few months of the war
if it had not been for this trawler organisation. Within
ten days of the declaration of hostilities there were 100 of
these fishing- vessels serving under the White Ensign.
They kept a channel up the coast swept clear for tramp
steamer and man-of-war alike. They had come straight
in from their fishing-grounds, landed their catch and their
gear, coaled, turned round, and away they had gone to sea
again, with the least possible delay, to begin one of the
most dangerous occupations which, in the whole history
of marine warfare, has ever been devised by the wit of
man. To these men the country owes an immeasurable
debt.
CHAPTER VII
THE APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE
THE Germans must have realised at an early stage in the
war that they could not hope seriously to interrupt British
sea-borne traffic, immense in volume and widely distri-
buted, with the comparatively few men-of-war and armed
merchantmen which they had operating on the trade
routes. The ultimate fate of those enemy vessels was also
certain in view of the large forces which the Allied fleets
were able to employ in hunting them down. The Germans
may also have been impressed by the confident statements
issued by the British Admiralty from time to time as to
the flow of traffic, and must have foreseen that month by
month the Allies, drawing from the inexhaustible resources
of the sea, would continue to grow in strength, while Ger-
many and the Powers associated with her would suffer
from increasing exhaustion due to the slow but relentless
pressure of superior sea-power. Before hostilities had been
in progress three months, there were indications that the
German naval authorities were searching for some means
by which they could strike an effective blow at the mer-
chant shipping of the Allies, and the United Kingdom in
particular, without endangering the existence of the High
Sea Fleet.
The whole civilised world was shocked, towards the end
of October 1914, by the story of the barbarous attack by a
German submarine upon the French s.s. Amiral Ganteaume,
crowded with Belgian refugees, about forty of whom were
killed.1 A charitable view was at first taken of the
incident, it being assumed that this attempt to sink a
vessel engaged on an errand of mercy was due to the ill-
considered act of an individual naval officer. That opinion
1 Subsequent examination of one of the damaged lifeboats of the Amiral
Oanteaume led to the discovery of the fragment of a German torpedo.
268
CH.VH] THE FIRST VICTIM 269
had, however, to be abandoned subsequently in face of
incidents which indicated that the Germans were defin-
itely testing the suitability of the submarine for cutting
the sea communications of the Allies.
Six days before this incident, on October 20th, the British
steamship Glitra, 866 tons, had been attacked in the North
Sea. That ship, which was old, slow, and, of course, un-
armed, left Grangemouth, at the head of the Firth of
Forth, for Stavanger on October 18th with a general cargo ;
the crew numbered seventeen. She followed the route laid
down by the Admiralty, steaming at about 8 knots. When
some fourteen miles west-south-west from Skudesnaes on
the Norwegian coast, at noon on the 21st, she unsuspect-
ingly hoisted the signal for a pilot, for no suspicious vessel
was in view. The response was instant. But as the
motor pilot-boat approached a low, long object, about
three miles to the seaward, was observed by the Glitra's
master (Mr. L. A. Johnston) and chief officer, who were
on the bridge. It proved to be Ul7 (Oberleutnant z. S.
Feldkirchner). The pilot-boat turned back, evidently
fearing trouble, and the master of the Glitra altered course
more to the north, in order to increase the distance be-
tween himself and the submarine. He had no reason to
anticipate molestation by the submarine, a thing unheard
of hitherto. The submarine, which had 5 knots superior
speed, followed the Glitra, subsequently describing a com-
plete circle round the defenceless merchant ship, and
carrying out a leisurely inspection. A gun mounted abaft
the conning-tower of the submarine was then fired, and
on the Glitra stopping, the Germans approached within
a ship's length and launched a collapsible boat. An officer
and two men forthwith boarded the merchantman. They
were fully armed and evidently in ruthless mood. The
master of the Glitra was immediately ordered off the
bridge, the German officer placing the muzzle of a re-
volver against his neck and excitedly warning him in
passable English that he would be allowed ten minutes
in which to get his crew away in the boats, and that then
his ship would be sunk.
While preparations were being made to leave the ship,
the Germans covered the crew with revolvers, and two
guns mounted in the submarine were trained threaten-
ingly on the vessel. Captain Johnston and his men
270 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
were refused permission to collect their clothes and other
belongings, and the Germans, having seized the ship's
papers, lowered the British flag, which was torn to
pieces and trampled underfoot with maniacal rage.
These actions were indicative of the spirit of the enemy's
seamen on entering upon the new campaign. As soon as
the crew had taken to the boats, the Germans transferred
to the submarine the charts and compasses of the Glitra,
without a word of apology for such acts of theft. In the
meantime, the commanding officer of the Ul7 had sent
an engineer into the engine-room, evidently to open the
valves, for shortly afterwards the ship began to settle
down, her late crew being helpless spectators. The sub-
marine towed the crowded boats for about a quarter of
an hour, and, having then cast them loose with direc-
tions to the men to row towards the land, returned
to complete the destruction of the Glitra. The pilot-boat
subsequently came to the rescue of the abandoned sea-
men and towed the boats until the Norwegian torpedo-
boat Hai appeared. This craft eventually landed Captain
Johnston and his men at Skudesnaes, from which place
they were taken on by a passenger steamer to Stavanger.
At the time this action of the Germans was regarded as
merely an isolated outrage of a despicable character, but
later events contradicted that impression. That the
officer commanding U17 had acted on instructions received
from superior authority, and that a definite policy of attack
was being tested before its adoption on a larger scale, was
afterwards suggested by the fate of the s.s. Malachite (718
tons). This vessel left Liverpool on November 19th for
Havre with a general cargo. She was about four miles
north by west from Cape la H&ve on the afternoon of the
23rd when she sighted U21, commanded by Kapitan-
Leutnant Otto Hersing, about two miles away on the star-
board beam. Warned by a shot fired across his bow, the
British master (Mr. Stephen Masson) stopped his engines.
The submarine then closed in, and particulars of the
voyage and the cargo were demanded in English. Question
and answer were shouted from deck to deck. The Germans,
realising that they had the British seamen at their mercy,
then hoisted their ensign, and directed the master to
carry all his papers to the enemy ship. When the crew were
taking to the boats, the officer remarked, as though
CH. vn] U21'S TEST CRUISE 271
ashamed of his conduct, that he was sorry he could not
accommodate the men on board the submarine, but " war
is war." Meantime the master had asked permission to
retain the logbook and the ship's articles. The request was
refused. When the men were clear of the ship, the sub-
marine began firing at the Malachite at a range of about
200 yards with a gun mounted abaft the conning-tower.
As the boats were being rowed towards Havre, which was
reached the same evening, the Germans were still firing
on the Malachite, and incidentally on the German flag,
which the doomed vessel continued to fly. It was after-
wards ascertained that the ship remained afloat and on
fire for twenty-four hours.
Three days later the same submarine encountered the
Primo (1,366 tons), which was on passage from Jarrow-on-
Tyne to Rouen with coal. She was six miles north-west by
north from Cape d'Antifer when the submarine, flying no
flag, appeared. As in the case of the Glitra and Malachite,
the attack was made by daylight, the Primo falling in with
the submarine at about 8 a.m. The captain of the sub-
marine adopted the same procedure as before, apologising
shamefacedly to the master (Mr. C. A. Whincop) for
the trouble caused, remarking that " This is war." The
master and crew, cast adrift in their boats, endeavoured
to reach a steamer which they saw at some distance, but
on hearing the firing of the submarine directed on the
Primo, that vessel sheered off in order to avoid sharing the
Primo 's fate. The seamen then rowed towards Fecamp,
and about two hours later were picked up by the s.s.
Clermiston and put ashore. The captain of the U21 ex-
perienced considerable difficulty in sinking the Primo.
Gunfire failed to achieve the purpose. When Captain
Whincop and his men last saw the vessel, she was still
afloat with the submarine standing by. Two days later
various vessels reported her as on fire and adrift.
The French naval authorities at Boulogne, learning that
an abandoned ship was afloat, a danger to traffic, dis-
patched a division of torpedo-boats on the last day of the
month to carry out a search. According to a report from
the Vice-Consul at Tre*port, the battered Primo was
ultimately sunk by a French torpedo-boat.
The sinking of these two merchant ships was the result
of the first cruise for commerce-destruction carried out
19
272 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH» vit
in the Channel by Kapitan-Leutnant Hersing. He was
dispatched, there is every reason to believe, to test
the adaptability of the submarine to a campaign on mer-
chant shipping, being chosen for this mission by reason of
the success which he had already achieved in the North
Sea. About the same time rumours were current of a
German plan to establish submarine bases in Flanders,
which had recently passed into the enemy's possession;
this intention, however, did not materialise until the fol-
lowing spring, and no other merchant ship was destroyed
before the close of the year, though one vessel had a
narrow escape. On December llth, the Colchester (1,209
tons), a passenger vessel of the Great Eastern Railway
Company, with a speed of about 13 knots, was crossing from
Rotterdam to Parkeston Quay, Harwich. When some
twenty-two miles from the Hook of Holland, at 8.20 a.m.,
she saw a submarine on the starboard bow steering approxi-
mately south-west by west. The master (Mr. F. Lawrence),
being at first doubtful of the nationality of the stranger
which was closing on his ship, ported his helm, bringing
the submarine on the starboard bow. The submarine
then turned to starboard and steamed direct for the
Colchester, at the same time rising well out of the water.
The Germans began to signal, but Captain Lawrence was
too busy watching his pursuer to pay attention to
signals, and in any case he was determined to spare no
effort to escape. As the submarine turned towards his
ship, he ported his helm again so as to bring the enemy
astern of him. His seaman's instinct prompted him to
turn out all the stokers, and the fires were double-banked
to obtain the utmost speed. In these exciting conditions
the chase continued for about twenty minutes. Finding
the British vessel was drawing away from her, the sub-
marine at last steered away south-west. The Admiralty
came to the conclusion that the submarine was a German
vessel, and commended the master of the Colchester for his
spirited action.
These incidents indicated the policy which the enemy
had determined to adopt. The High Sea Fleet dared not
face a general action against superior forces ; the whole
Austrian Navy was held firmly in the Adriatic ; the
enemy cruisers — armed merchantmen as well as men-of-
war — had been nearly all rounded up, and enemy com-
CH. vn] THE END AND THE MEANS 273
merce had been swept off the seas. Driven to desperation
by the complete failure to interfere with the transport of
the British Army or to interrupt seriously British ocean
commerce, the German authorities had searched round for
some method of striking a vital blow at the one Power
which, encompassed by the sea, they could not reach
with their army or navy. When the war opened Ger-
many possessed only twenty-eight submarines ; the oldest
of these craft, eighteen in number, were built between
1905 and 1912, but ten of them, U19 to U28, of later and
improved construction, were thoroughly reliable vessels.
During the early phase of hostilities, the German General
Staff was encouraged by events, judging by the comments
in the German newspapers, to believe that, with the aid
of the submarine, a war of attrition could be pursued
until at last the two fighting fleets — the Grand Fleet and
the High Sea Fleet — stood at something approaching
parity in strength. As early as September 5th, the
light cruiser PATHFINDER had been sunk at the entrance to
the Firth of Forth by U21. Later in the same month a
single submarine, U9, under the command of Otto von
Weddigen, had destroyed in rapid succession the armoured
cruisers HOGUE, CRESSY, and ABOUKIR, with heavy loss of
life. These successes produced a great effect on German
opinion, and it was intensified when, on October 15th,
the cruiser HAWKE was sunk in the North Sea. Orders
must almost immediately have been given to a certain
number of submarine commanders to prove whether
U-boats might be employed against merchant shipping.
The incidents already recorded brought conviction to the
German Naval Staff that submarines could, at one and
the same time, wage war against the British Navy and
the British Mercantile Marine, thus week by week wearing
down the essential sea power of the British people.
The attack upon commerce involved the infraction of
international law and a denial of the common dictates of
humanity, since submarines, owing to their limited
accommodation, could not become " places of safety "
for the crews of the ships destroyed. But those were not
matters to trouble the Germans, ready to believe that the
end — a German victory — would justify the means. . The
subsequent action of the German Government and the
character of its pronouncements support the impression
274 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
that the belief existed that the mere threat of a sub-
marine campaign, supported by a comparatively few ruth-
less acts, would intimidate British seamen, with the result
that the seas would be cleared of British shipping, thus
preparing the foundations for the conclusion of a German
peace. By that time it had become apparent to the
German authorities that their military machine had failed
to realise the hopes which rested in it within the limit of
time laid down by the General Staff. Germany had become
involved, not in a short campaign resembling those waged
in 1864, in 1866, and in 1870-1, but, owing to the inter-
vention of British sea power, in a long and exhausting war,
the issue of which was uncertain. They had under-esti-
mated the influence of sea power, and they hailed the
submarine as offering them an escape from an exceedingly
embarrassing situation.
In these circumstances, the submarine, with all it im-
plied of inhuman terrorism, was adopted as giving the
promise of an early peace on Germany's own terms. The
enemy's growing intention was revealed before the end
of the year in an interview with Grand-Admiral von
Tirpitz, then Naval Secretary, which was published in the
New York Sun on December 22nd. Referring to the
possibilities of a submarine campaign, he declared, " It
is difficult to draw conclusions just yet, but it is unques-
tionable that submarines are a new and powerful weapon
of naval warfare." At the same time he confessed — and
the confession indicates the restrictions which it was then
believed limited the activity of these craft — " One must
not forget that submarines do their best work along the
coast and in shallow waters, and that for this reason the
Channel is particularly suitable for this craft. The suc-
cesses which have been achieved hitherto do not warrant
the conclusion that the day of large ships is past. It is
still questionable whether submarines would have made
such a fine show in other waters. We have learnt a good
deal about submarines in this war. We thought that
they would not be able to remain much longer than three
days away from their base, as the crews would then neces-
sarily be exhausted. But we soon learnt that the larger
type of these boats can navigate round the whole of
England, and can remain absent as long as a fortnight.
All that is necessary is that the crew gets an opportunity
CH. vii] U19 AND THE " DUE WARD " 275
of resting and recuperating, and this opportunity can be
afforded the men by taking the boat to the shallow and
still waters, where it can rest on the bottom and, remain-
ing still in the water, the crew can have a good sleep.
This is only possible where the water is comparatively
shallow." He put the further query, " What would
America say if Germany should declare a submarine war
against all enemy trading vessels ? "
That this was something more than a mere academic
expression of professional views became clear in the light
of later events. After the appearance of this interview,
which was no doubt intended to test public opinion in the
United States and other neutral countries, a period of
nearly a month occurred, during which no British vessel
was attacked by a submarine. It was soon apparent
that the enemy had devoted attention to the study of the
problem which the new policy, directly foreshadowed by
Grand- Admiral von Tirpitz, presented. German sub-
marines were provided with bombs to be used in circum-
stances in which such comparatively cheap and light
weapons could be employed, thus economising the expendi-
ture of torpedoes, of which each vessel could carry only a
few. At this stage of the war, therefore, the German sub-
marines, particularly susceptible to surface attack owing
to the vulnerability of their hulls, depended for offensive
purposes on the bomb, and in the last resort on the tor-
pedo, though some of them were provided with light guns.
On January 21st, 1915, in rainy but clear weather, the
s.s. Durward (1,301 tons) was two days out from Leith,
on passage to Rotterdam, when the chief officer, who
was on the bridge, reported to the master (Mr. John
Wood) that a suspicious submarine was about Ij points
before the steamer's starboard beam. On going on deck
and looking through his glasses, ^Captain Wood saw that the
strange ship was flying the signal to stop instantly. The
submarine was only about a mile and a half distant and
was showing no colours ; she was steaming towards the
Durward on an opposite course. The British ship was
travelling at about 12 knots. Captain Wood at once
determined to ignore the signal, and, going into the
engine-room, gave directions to put on all possible speed.
When he returned to the deck, he saw that the submarine
had altered course and was heading for the Durward's
276 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
starboard side, at the same time flying the signal " Stop,
or I fire." Within half an hour of the first sighting of
the enemy craft, the submarine, in spite of the best endea-
vours of the Durward's engine-room staff, had managed to
get under the ship's starboard quarter, and shortly after-
wards a warning rocket was fired. Captain Wood realised
that further effort to escape was impossible, and stopped
his engines. The submarine proved to be U19 (which had
recently been rammed by H.M.S. BADGER), and the conduct
of the commanding officer, Oberleutnant Kolbe, towards
the British seamen merits being recalled in view of later
events. In reply to a signal, the chief officer of the Dur-
ward and three men of the crew carried the ship's papers on
board the submarine. As soon as the boat got alongside
the enemy vessel, a group of German seamen put off, them-
selves using the Durwctrd's boat, and an officer, speaking
in good English, ordered Captain Wood to get everyone
into the boats as quickly as possible. After the crew
had left and while the British master was on board U19,
to which he had been taken, the boarding-party placed
two bombs against the ship's side. About twenty minutes
afterwards explosions occurred, the vessel beginning at
once to settle down in the water, to the grief and con-
sternation of the British seamen. The German commander
towed the two British boats for about half an hour in a
northerly direction. Casting them adrift, he went back
to the Durward, subsequently returning to give a further
tow until he was within one mile north of the Maas light-
ship, as though anxious to do what he could for members
of the same great brotherhood of the sea while conform-
ing to the orders he had received from his superiors. From
first to last the British seamen had been well treated, and,
having been placed in a position of comparative safety,
they were left to their own resources. Eventually a
Dutch pilot steamer took them on board and towed the
two boats as far as the Hook of Holland. The craft were
returned later on to their owners, and, apart from the
loss of the ship and the crews' effects, the incident was
marked by no exhibition of Prussianism.
On the last day of January no fewer than seven ships
were attacked, and only one, the Graphic (1,871 tons),
escaped. Of the six vessels which were destroyed, three
were intercepted by the enemy outside Liverpool, point-
CH. vn] OPERATIONS OFF LIVERPOOL 277
ing to a carefully prepared plan of attack by the submarine
under Kapitan-Leutnant Hersing to test the possibilities of
virtually blockading a great commercial port. At 10. 30 a. m.
the Ben Cruachan (3,092 tons ; master, Mr. D. W. Heggie)
was sunk by bombs, the crew, who had taken to the two
lifeboats, being directed to steer towards the sailing trawler
Margaret, by which they were landed at Fleetwood. About
an hour later the same submarine, U21, fell in with the
Linda Blanche, a small steamer of 369 tons. The pro-
cedure was the same as in the case of the Ben Cruachan,
the crew being advised to steer towards the trawler Niblet,
by which they were taken to Fleetwood. When the
boarding-party reached the Linda Blanche, some of the
Germans gave cigars and cigarettes to the British crew, as
though to indicate that they did not care for their work.
At 1.30 p.m. the s.s. Kilcoan was sunk. The mate, who was
on deck in charge of this little ship of 456 tons, shouted
down to the master (Mr. James Maneely) to come on
deck, as a submarine wished to speak to him. On going
up, Captain Maneely found the submarine close to the
starboard side, with a machine-gun trained on the Kilcoan.
Her hull was painted a dull white, the conning-tower
being of a darker colour. Ten men stood on the deck of
the enemy craft, most of them armed with revolvers, but
two carrying rifles. In face of this menacing exhibition,
what could the British seaman do but comply with any
demands ? Kapitan-Leutnant Hersing shouted in English,
" Get into your boats." The men promptly launched the
starboard and port boats, and all hands took their places.
The boats were then ordered alongside the submarine, and
the crew were directed to get on board. The master was
asked peremptorily for his papers and, as he had not brought
them with him, he was sent for them. Four fully armed
German seamen, carrying an explosive bomb fitted with
about two yards of fuse, accompanied him. The Germans
remained on deck while the master went below to obtain
the ship's certificate of register and other papers, which
he handed over to a petty officer. The logbook was saved,
Captain Maneely suggesting in his answers to questions
that he did not know where it was. The enemy, however,
secured the ship's ensign and the Union Jack.
In the meantime, one of the German seamen had fixed
the bomb amidship and set the fuse alight. The skipper
278 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
and the boarding-party then left the Kilcoan to return to
the submarine. While they were on their way back, the
bomb exploded, tearing a hole in the port side of the
steamer. The members of the crew of the British ship,
still on board the submarine and wondering what their
fate would be, were ordered back into their boats. Then
occurred an unexpected diversion. In the distance the
German officer discerned the steamer Gladys from Liverpool
to Douglas. He made off towards her and directed her
captain to pick up the Kilcoaris men. He then returned
to the Kilcoan and fired at that vessel in order to hasten
her destruction. The submarine at length disappeared,
and late that night the British seamen's adventure ended
when they were landed at Fleetwood without further
mishap. On the same day the Graphic, twenty-two miles
from Liverpool Bar light-vessel, was chased, but, thanks
to her speed, succeeded in making her escape.
In the meantime, another submarine — U20 — was busy
farther south, pursuing a policy of torpedoing ships at sight,
no warning of any kind being given. The Shaw Savill liner
Tokomaru (6,084 tons) was sunk seven miles north-west
from Havre light- vessel, and the Ikaria (4,335 tons) nearly
twenty miles farther away, both on January 30th. The
former vessel was on her way from Wellington, New Zea-
land, and Tenerife. At nine o'clock on the morning of that
day, in fine, clear weather, the sea being smooth, she was
slowly steaming towards Havre looking for a pilot. The
master (Mr. Francis Greene) had no suspicion of the menace
which threatened him. He was on the bridge, with the
second and third mates, an A.B. being on the lookout for-
ward. Suddenly an explosion occurred on the port side,
sending the water up over the bridge and filling the stoke-
hold. The ship at once listed heavily and commenced to
sink. It was evident that the submarine was watching the
effect of its torpedo, for a periscope was seen by Captain
Greene three cables away. The commander of the sub-
marine, his act of savagery consummated, then disappeared,
caring nothing as to the fate of the British sailors. The
experience of the Tokomaru 's crew was one which no sea-
man had hitherto suffered, but nevertheless discipline was
maintained and all the hands succeeded in getting into
the boats — the captain going over the side last in accord-
ance with tradition. Within an hour the men were
CH. vn] TORPEDOED WITHOUT WARNING 279
safely on board the French mine-sweeper Saint Pierre.
Before being landed at Havre, Captain Greene and his
companions saw their ship disappear beneath the
water.
Shortly after noon on the same day the Leyland liner
Ikaria, which left Santos and other South American ports for
Havre, stopped off Cape la Heve to pick up a pilot. The
ship still had slight headway on her when the master (Mr.
Matthew Robertson), who was on the bridge, saw the wake
of a torpedo, fired, there is no reason to doubt, by U20.
There was no time to use the helm, for almost immediately
afterwards the vessel was struck on the port side abreast
of No. 1 hatch and began to sink gradually by the head.
The boats were ordered out and the officers and men
proceeded on board a tug which happened, fortunately,
to be close by. About an hour later, the Ikaria being still
afloat, Captain Robertson, with some of his men, boarded
her. He came to the conclusion that the ship could be
saved. She was only about twenty-five miles from
Havre, the sea was smooth and there was no wind. With
the assistance of a tug, the Ikaria was got into Havre and
berthed alongside Quai d'Escale, where she remained
until midday on January 31st. The port authorities,
becoming nervous lest she should sink and thus impede
traffic, removed her to the west of the Avant Port, to-
wards the breakwater, where she sank on February 2nd,
leaving her afterpart showing.
There is no reason to doubt that the General Steam
Navigation Company's steamer Oriole (1,489 tons) met
her fate also at the hands of U20, but her end was mysteri-
ous. The Oriole left London for Havre on January 29th,
and passed the s.s. London Trader off Dungeness on the
afternoon of the following day. The distance from Dunge-
ness to Havre being from ninety to ninety-five miles, the
Oriole should have reached the latter port about ten o'clock
that evening. She was never heard of again. Later in the
year, Mr. Justice Bailhache had to decide in the High
Court the fate of the vessel. In the course of his judg-
ment, he told of two pathetic incidents. On February 6th,
two lifebuoys were found on the coast between Hastings
and Dymchurch, a little seaside place to the north of
Dungeness. The name Oriole was painted upon them. In
the following month — on March 20th — a Guernsey fisher-
280 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
man picked out of the sea an ordinary beer-bottle con-
taining a piece of paper. On the bottle being broken,
the paper was found to be an envelope embossed with
the name of the General Steam Navigation Company,
and written in pencil was the message, "Oriole tor-
pedoed— sinking." The widow of the ship's carpenter
identified the handwriting as that of her husband. After
considering all the evidence, Mr. Justice Bailhache came to
the conclusion that the only reasonable explanation of the
disappearance of the Oriole was that she was torpedoed
by the enemy, the master (Mr. William G. Dale) and his
crew of twenty men perishing. The story has an historical
interest since, whereas the Glitra was the first vessel to
be sunk by a submarine — on October 20th, 1914 — the
Tokomaru and the Ikaria were the first to be torpedoed
without warning, while the Oriole9 destroyed in the same
barbarous way, was the first British loss which involved
the death of the crew. Later events were to overshadow
this tragedy of the war, presenting a picture of such large,
dramatic, and terrible proportions that in a few months
the story of the fate of these defenceless British seamen
shrank into comparative oblivion.
These first outbursts of terrorism by sea, though suc-
ceeded by an interval of a fortnight during which no
British vessel was sunk and only two were attacked, proved
merely the preliminary acts to the declaration of a definite
policy on the part of the enemy. Since the sinking of
the Glitra the practicability of employing submarines in
attacking commerce had been tested under varying con-
ditions. The reports received had encouraged hopes that
at last a means had been discovered for bringing the war
to a speedy end. A good deal had been written of the
submarine and its psychological influence, and the enemy
embarked upon the new policy in full confidence that
the war would be ended by the severance of the maritime
communications of the British people, even if the mere
announcement of the intention to employ submarines
on a large scale in an attack upon British shipping
did not break the courage of the officers and men.
Accordingly, on February 4th, 1915, the following memo-
randum was issued by the German Government:
" Since the commencement of the present war Great
cir. vn] THE GERMAN DECLARATION 281
Britain's conduct of commercial warfare against Germany
has been a mockery of all the principles of the law
of nations. While the British Government have by
several orders declared that their naval forces should
be guided by the stipulations of the Declaration of Lon-
don, they have in reality repudiated this declaration in
the most essential points, notwithstanding the fact that
their own delegates at the Maritime Conference of London
acknowledged its acts as forming part of existing inter-
national law. The British Government have placed a
number of articles on the contraband list which are not
at all, or only very indirectly, capable of use in warfare,
and consequently cannot be treated as contraband either
under the Declaration of London or under the generally
acknowledged rules of international law.
" In addition, they have in fact obliterated the dis-
tinction between absolute and conditional contraband
by confiscating all articles of conditional contraband
destined for Germany, whatever may be the port where
these articles are to be unloaded, and without regard
to whether they are destined for uses of war or peace.
They have not even hesitated to violate the Declaration of
Paris, since their naval forces have captured on neutral
ships German property which was not contraband of war.
Furthermore, they have gone further than their own orders
respecting the Declaration of London, and caused numerous
German subjects capable of bearing arms to be taken from
neutral ships and made prisoners of war.
" Finally, they have declared the North Sea in its whole
extent to be the seat of war, thereby rendering difficult
and extremely dangerous, if not impossible, all navigation
on the high seas between Scotland and Norway, so that
they have in a way established a blockade of neutral coasts
and ports, which is contrary to the elementary principles
of generally accepted international law. Clearly all these
measures are part of a plan to strike not only at the Ger-
man military operations, but also at the economic system
of Germany, and in the end to deliver the whole German
people to reduction by famine, by intercepting legitimate
neutral commerce by methods contrary to international
law.
" The neutral Powers have in the main acquiesced in
the measures of the British Government ; in particular
282 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
they have not been successful in securing the release by the
British Government of the German subjects and German
merchandise illegally taken from their vessels. To a cer-
tain extent they have even contributed towards the
execution of the measures adopted by England in defiance
of the principle of the freedom of the seas by prohibiting
the export and transit of goods destined for peaceable
purposes in Germany, thus evidently yielding to pressure
by England.
" The German Government have in vain called the
attention of the neutral Powers to the fact that Germany
must seriously question whether it can any longer adhere
to the stipulations of the Declaration of London, hitherto
strictly observed by it, in case England continues to
adhere to its practice, and the neutral Powers persist in
looking with indulgence upon all these violations of
neutrality to the detriment of Germany. Great Britain
invokes the vital interest of the British Empire which
are at stake in justification of its violations of the law of
nations, and the neutral Powers appear to be satisfied
with theoretical protests, thus actually admitting the
vital interests of a belligerent as a sufficient excuse for
methods of waging war of whatever description.
" The time has now come for Germany also to invoke
such vital interests. It therefore finds itself under the
necessity, to its regret, of taking military measures against
England in retaliation of the practice followed by England.
Just as England declared the whole North Sea between
Scotland and Norway to be comprised within the seat of
war, so does Germany now declare the waters surrounding
Great Britain and Ireland, including the whole English
Channel, to be comprised within the seat of war, and will
prevent by all the military means at its disposal all navi-
gation by the enemy in those waters.
" To this end it will endeavour to destroy, after Feb-
ruary 18th next, any merchant vessels of the enemy
which present themselves at the seat of war above
indicated, although it may not always be possible to avert
the dangers which may menace persons and merchandise.
" Neutral Powers are accordingly forewarned not to
continue to entrust their crews, passengers, or merchandise
to such vessels. Their attention is furthermore called to
the fact that it is of urgency to recommend to their own
CH. vn] THE "WAR ZONE" 283
vessels to steer clear of these waters. It is true that the
German Navy has received instructions to abstain from
all violence against neutral vessels recognisable as such ;
but in view of the hazards of war, and of the misuse of the
neutral flag ordered by the British Government, it will
not always be possible to prevent a neutral vessel from
becoming the victim of an attack intended to be directed
against a vessel of the enemy. It is expressly declared that
navigation in waters north of the Shetland Islands is out-
side the danger zone, as well as navigation in the eastern
part of the North Sea and in a zone thirty miles wide
along the Dutch coast.
" The German Government announces this measure at
a time permitting enemy and neutral ships to make the
necessary arrangements to reach the ports situated at
the seat of war. They hope that the neutral Powers will
accord consideration to the vital interests of Germany
equally with those of England, and will on their part assist
in keeping their subjects and their goods far from the
seat of war : the more so since they likewise have a great
interest in seeing the termination at an early day of the
war now raging. — Berlin, February 4th, 1915."
This declaration was epitomised in a proclamation of
the same date, signed by Admiral von Pohl, Chief of the
Admiralty Staff of the German Navy, in the following
terms :
"1. The waters surrounding Great Britain and Ireland,
including the whole English Channel, are hereby declared
to be a War Zone. On and after February 18th, 1915, every
enemy merchant ship found in the said war zone will be
destroyed without it being always possible to avert the
dangers threatening the crews and passengers on that
account.
" 2. Even neutral ships are exposed to danger in the
war zone, as in view of the misuse of neutral flags ordered
on January 31st by the British Government, and of the
accidents of naval war, it cannot always be avoided to
strike even neutral ships in attacks that are directed on
enemy ships.
" 3. Northward navigation around the Shetland Islands,
in the eastern waters of the North Sea, and in a strip of
284 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. YII
not less than thirty miles width from the northward coast,
is in no danger.
"VON POHL,
" Chief of the Admiralty Staff of the Navy.
"BEBLIN,
"February 4th, 1915." l
To this announcement the British Government issued
the following reply on March 1st, 1915 :
" Germany has declared that the English Channel, the
north and west coasts of France, and the waters round
the British Isles are a ' war area,' and has officially notified
that ' all enemy ships found in that area will be destroyed.'
This is, in effect, a claim to torpedo at sight, without re-
gard to the safety of the crew or passengers, any merchant
vessel under any flag. As it is not in the power of the
German Admiralty to maintain any surface craft in these
waters, this attack can only be delivered by submarine
agency. The law and custom of nations in regard to
attacks on commerce have always presumed that the first
duty of the captor of a merchant vessel is to bring it
before a Prize Court, where it may be tried, where the
regularity of the capture may be challenged, and where
neutrals may recover their cargoes.
" The sinking of prizes is, in itself, a questionable act,
to be resorted to only in extraordinary circumstances, and
after provision has been made for the safety of all the
crew or passengers (if there are passengers on board).
The responsibility for discriminating between neutral and
enemy vessels, and between neutral and enemy cargo,
obviously rests with the attacking ship, whose duty
it is to verify the status and character of the vessel and
cargo and to preserve all papers before sinking or even
capturing it. So also is the humane duty of providing
for the safety of the crews of merchant vessels, whether
neutral or enemy, an obligation upon every belligerent.
It is upon this basis that all previous discussions of the
law for regulating warfare at sea have proceeded.
" A German submarine, however, fulfils none of these
1 A translation accompanying the dispatch of Ambassador Gerard to
the Secretary of State, February 6th, 1915. This proclamation was pub-
lished in the Reichsanzeiger of February 4th, 1915. (No. 29.)
CH. vn] "INDISCRIMINATE DESTRUCTION" 285
obligations. She enjoys no local command of the waters
in which she operates. She does not take her captures
within the jurisdiction of a Prize Court. She carries no
prize crew which she can put on board a prize. She uses
no effective means of discriminating between a neutral
and an enemy vessel. She does not receive on board for
safety the crew of the vessel she sinks. Her methods of
warfare are, therefore, entirely outside the scope of any of
the international instruments regulating operations against
commerce in time of war. The German declaration sub-
stitutes indiscriminate destruction for regulated capture.
" Germany is adopting these methods against peaceful
traders and non-combatant crews with the avowed object
of preventing commodities of all kinds (including food
for the civil population) from reaching or leaving the
British Isles or Northern France. Her opponents are,
therefore, driven to frame retaliatory measures in order
in their turn to prevent commodities of any kind from
reaching or leaving Germany. These measures will, how-
ever, be enforced by the British and French Governments
without risk to neutral ships or to neutral or non-com-
batant life, and in strict observance of the dictates of
humanity. ..."
As already stated, it was evidently anticipated by the
Germans that the announcement of their intention to
employ submarines in an attack upon British shipping
would break the courage of officers and men. That this
expectation was ill-founded was proved by the continued
flow of traffic to and from the British Isles, and the
hardihood and seamanship which were exhibited during
the next few weeks, not by one ship merely, but by many.
Between the beginning of February and the end of May,
123 vessels were molested by submarines, and more than
half of them — sixty-four to be exact — managed to escape.
Thirty-one of these ships, slow tramps though they were
for the most part, owed their good fortune to their speed,
of which the captains took the fullest advantage. At this
period of the war the Germans were able to employ only a
comparatively small number of submarines, and the surface
speed of these was slow. After Grand- Admiral von Tirpitz
had relinquished office some months later, he was severely
criticised for having failed to provide a sufficient number
286 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
of submarines of suitable types to insure the success of
Germany's policy. Down to the end of April the loss of
British tonnage, in comparison with the great volume
operating in the waters surrounding the British Isles,
proved a great disappointment to the eneiny, who was
compelled to readjust his estimate of the character of the
British seamen and their seamanlike qualities.
The story of the Laertes (4,541 tons) provided a con-
spicuous illustration of the spirit which animated the
service. This ship (master, Mr. William H. Propert) left
Liverpool on Sunday, February 7th, with a general cargo
for Java, being under orders to call at Amsterdam. Captain
Propert had been in charge of the ship for two voyages to
the Far East, and had come to the conclusion that the
vessel's best speed was llf knots. The vessel had a crew
of fifty-one officers and men, including twenty-four Chinese.
By four o'clock on the 10th, the Laertes reached a point
about twelve miles from the Schouwen Bank lightship. The
master and the second officer were on the bridge, a good
lookout was being kept by men stationed on the poop
and in the crow's-nest on the foremast, and the ship was
making her best speed, when a submarine was seen about
v three miles away bearing two points on the starboard
bow. Captain Propert promptly ordered the helm to be
starboarded one point, and almost at the same moment
the submarine hoisted a signal directing the vessel to
heave to, and threatening to fire if the order was not
obeyed. Captain Propert ignored the signal and deter-
mined to make an effort to escape ; the enemy submarine
made straight for the Laertes at top speed. What happened
can, perhaps, best be told in Captain Propert's own words :
" My engines were well opened out, and I kept star-
boarding my helm to avoid him, but he gained steadily ;
and at 4.15 p.m., when he was about one point and a half
on the starboard quarter, distant about three-quarters
of a mile, he opened fire with a machine-gun, directing his
fire on the bridge. I then starboarded further and brought
him right astern, keeping the ship going at the highest
speed she could make. Just at this time four or five
single shots were heard, indicating that we were also
being subjected to rifle fire. (Three bullets of different
kinds were found later in various parts of the ship.)
CH. vn] HOW THE " LAERTES " ESCAPED 287
' This was about 4.20 p.m., and the firing was kept up
continuously until about 5.15 p.m., the submarine being
kept all the time as much astern as possible by the use of
our helm. In order to deceive him, I also hoisted the
answering pennant indicating that I had read his signals.
This I did twice, but he did not appear to reduce his
speed, and when he had come within less than a quarter
of a mile from the Laertes, at about 5.15, he gave one
continued discharge from the machine-gun and then fell
astern. About six minutes later, when he was well astern
slightly on our starboard quarter, I ported the helm one
point and immediately noticed a torpedo coming straight
for the ship about two cables off on the starboard quarter.
My helm was at once put hard aport, and the torpedo
passed astern very close to the ship.
;t The submarine at this time was enveloped in a cloud
of steam and appeared to be in difficulties. It was dusk
by this time, and a steamer, which came up on my port
side steering directly towards the submarine, was given
the signal, ' You are steering into danger.' The other
ship altered her course, but appeared to resume the former
course a little later. I had no means of ascertaining the
name of the other vessel, and she made no attempt to
speak further with us.
" I now hauled the Laertes round and steered in a
northerly direction, gradually swinging her in towards
the land and taking continual soundings as we approached.
When we had reached a point about seventeen miles off
Ymuiden, a green light appeared on my port bow three
miles distant. I put the helm hard astarboard, and the
light suddenly disappeared and was not seen again. As
this was suspicious, I put the helm hard aport, but no
further lights were observed. I then took in the regula-
tion lights, and, while they were kept ready at hand,
they were not again exhibited until we had come close to
Ymuiden, which port we reached at about 10.30 p.m.
on February 10th. No lives were lost and no injury
received by any person on board the Laertes. The upper
bridge, the casing of the standard compass, two boats,
several ventilators, the main funnel, donkey funnel, and
exhaust pipe, were pierced by bullets, and there may be
some further damage. I cannot estimate the amount
of this damage. The Dutch flag had been hoisted at
20
288 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
about 4 p.m. on February 9th, and was kept con-
tinually flying during daylight. The name of the port
of registry had also been obscured. Two boats had been
swung out ready for loading and two lifted from the chocks
on February 9th."
That is the modest record of an escape from the enemy
which suggested, in association with a hundred other
incidents, that British seamen were not prepared to sur-
render to the enemy without a struggle. The Admiralty
marked their appreciation of Captain Propert's " gallant
and spirited conduct " by granting him a temporary
commission as lieutenant in the Royal Naval Reserve,
and awarding him the Distinguished Service Cross ; a
gold watch, with a letter of commendation, was presented
to each of the officers, and a complimentary grant of £3
was made to every member of the crew.
By this time it was evident that the enemy, with limited
resources — how limited was not known to the British
Government at the time — was determined to make a
desperate attack on the British Mercantile Marine, paying
no regard to the ordinary humanities which in previous
wars had restricted the action of belligerents. The
number of cases in which torpedoes were fired against
ships unarmed, and therefore incapable of resisting
visit and search, steadily increased. The Membland
(3,027 tons) was destroyed in the North Sea either by
mine or by submarine ; she disappeared about Febru-
ary 15th, together with her officers and men, numbering
twenty, and the cause of the loss of this valuable cargo-
carrier and the destruction of so many lives will probably
never be known. Nothing, perhaps, is more remarkable
than the comparatively small loss of life which, in fact,
occurred during this early period of the submarine cam-
paign. That immunity must be attributed to the high
standard of seamanship maintained in the British Mer-
cantile Marine, and the skill exhibited by officers and men
in the management of the small boats to which they
were compelled to confide their fortunes after their ships
had sunk. Typical illustrations of the hazardous ex-
periences which fell to the crews of ships destroyed at
sight are supplied by the stories of the Dulwich (3,289
tons) and Cambank (3,112 tons), the former attacked
CH. vii] LOSS OF LIFE 289
off Cape la Heve on February 15th, and the latter ten
miles east of Lynns Point, on the north-eastern coast of
Anglesey. The Dulwich was on her way to Rouen, when
an explosion occurred on the starboard side. Night had
descended, and it is not difficult to imagine the momentary
consternation which was caused as the ship listed slightly
to starboard, and then began to settle by the stern.
Fortunately, the boats had been swung out and were
uninjured. The master (Mr. J. A. Hunter) soon had his
men transhipped, twenty-two being allotted to one boat
and nine to the other. Within about twenty minutes
the Dulwich had disappeared in a swirl of foaming water,
and then a submarine was dimly seen travelling on the
surface of the water, a menacing spectacle for the British
seamen who had been left to the mercy of the sea on this
winter's night. The enemy, callous as to the fate of these
men, was evidently watching the effects of the explosion
—making sure that the ship sank. The boats soon after-
wards became separated. A French torpedo-destroyer
picked up the master and his twenty-one companions
shortly after eight o'clock that night and took them into
Havre. The other boat, with only seven men on board,
reached Fecamp, and thus two lives were added to the
death roll of the campaign. How these two men came to
their end is uncertain, as they were seen leaving the fore-
castle to enter the boats by Captain Hunter when he and
the chief officer made their final round of inspection.
The loss of life in the case of the s.s. Cambank was
heavier. This ship was on passage from Huelva to Liverpool
with a cargo of copper and sulphur ore. The voyage
proceeded uneventfully until February 12th. At mid-
night on that date a gale from the south-west sprang up
and continued to blow throughout the following day.
Early on the 14th the wind shifted to the north-west.
A heavy sea struck the ship at 9 a.m. on the port side,
staving in No. 1 hatch. The master (Mr. T. R. Prescott)
kept his vessel away before the wind and sea and was able
to reach Falmouth. Temporary repairs were effected
at that port, and on the 17th the vessel left to resume
her voyage. Three days later, after taking up a pilot
at Lynns Point, the Cambank saw the periscope of a sub-
marine 1 about 250 yards on the port beam, and immediately
1 U30, according to German accounts.
290 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
afterwards the track of a torpedo was noticed making for
the merchantman. The Cambank's helm was put hard
aport, but, before the ship could answer, the torpedo
struck her near the engine-room. It was at once evident
to Captain Prescott that the vessel would speedily sink,
and he ordered the crew to take to the boats. Midnight,
the enemy near at hand, and their ship so fatally
damaged that officers and men had no choice but to confide
their lives to frail boats ! The starboard lifeboat was
successfully lowered, and into her scrambled twenty-one
of the twenty-five men on board, including the pilot.
What happened to the other four men is a matter of
speculation. For a quarter of an hour the survivors lay
off the doomed ship, which at last broke in two amidships
and was swallowed up in the waters. Eventually these
men, having been buffeted in a hurricane and then at-
tacked by the enemy, succeeded in reaching port.
On the evening of the same day the steam collier Down-
shire (337 tons) was steaming at about 10 knots off the Calf
of Man, when she saw a submarine standing to the north-
ward on the starboard bow, being about one and a half
to two miles distant. The enemy gained rapidly on the
British ship and, when about a quarter of a mile away,
fired a shot from a gun on the fore-deck. The master
of the Downshire (Mr. W. H. Connor) ignored the warning,
and then a second shot was fired. The collier, which
was travelling at full speed, still stood on her course.
A third shot followed. The submarine was then close
up, and as it was apparent that escape was impossible the
engines were stopped. The crew were ordered to the boats,
a bomb was placed against the side of the vessel by the Ger-
mans, and the ship was sunk. Fortunately in this instance
there was no> loss of life, but that was due to no considera-
tion on the part of the commander of the submarine.
Three days later — on February 23rd — two vessels were
sunk without warning, the Oakby (1,976 tons ; master, Mr.
F. J. Bartlett), off the Royal Sovereign light- vessel, and the
Branksome Chine (2,026 tons ; master, Mr. F. J. Anstey),
six miles E. by S. f S. from Beachy Head — evidently by
the same submarine. Within five minutes of the torpedo
striking the port side of the Oakby, the forecastle was level
with the water. It seemed as though the ship must
founder rapidly. Nevertheless, the second engineer went
CH. vii] TORPEDOED IN THE CHANNEL 291
below and stopped the engines so as to enable the boats
to be lowered.1 The vessel took so long in settling
down that an attempt was made by the patrol-boat ISLE
OF MAN, which had come on the scene, to tow her to
Dover. The effort was unsuccessful, the Oakby sinking
near the Varne Lightship. The loss of the Branksome
Chine was marked by no noticeable incident, the crew
managing to make their escape in safety.
On the following day undoubted evidence was furnished
that an enemy submarine, commanded by an experienced
and daring, if callous, officer, was operating in this part
of the English Channel, the Rio Parana (4,015 tons) and
the Western Coast (1,165 tons) being destroyed off Beachy
Head. In the first case no submarine was sighted, but
the ship was struck on the starboard side, with the result
that ports and doors were stove in, jammed, or broken,
and a great volume of water entered the saloon. In these
conditions, the master (Mr. J. Williams) and the crew
prepared to abandon the ship. By the time their prepara-
tions were completed, the ship was considerably down at
the head, and the water was flush with her deck. It was
at first suggested that the casualty was due to a mine,
but the Admiralty, in view of all the circumstances, came
to a contrary conclusion. This was supported by in-
telligence as to the fate of the Western Coast. This
vessel was on her way from London to Plymouth,
where warnings of the presence of enemy submarines were
given by a destroyer, and shortly afterwards a ship in
distress was noticed. The second officer of the Western
Coast (master, Mr. J. Ratcliffe) was on his way to report
the incident when an explosion occurred, a column of water
rising forty or fifty feet. The ship immediately began to
settle down, but, though she sank in two or three minutes,
Captain Ratcliffe and his men managed to make their
escape. The month's losses closed with the sinking of
another ship — the Harpalion (5,867 tons ; master, Mr. A.
Widders) — not far from the Royal Sovereign light -vessel.
A violent explosion occurred which killed three firemen,
and then the ship was enveloped in steam and water
poured over the port side.
Though enemy submarines secured eight British ships
1 The second engineer, Mr. Stanley Robinson, was awarded the Bronze
Medal for gallantry in saving life at sea.
292 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
during the month of February, ten succeeded in escaping.
Of these, in addition to the Laertes, a notable experience was
that of the master and men of the Thordis (501 tons). Her
case attracted a good deal of attention at the time owing to
the fine spirit exhibited by master and men. The Thordis
(master, Mr. J. W. Bell) left Blyth on the afternoon of
February 24th, with a cargo of coal for Plymouth. Every-
thing went well until the 28th, when the ship was about
eight or ten miles off Beachy Head, which bore north-east
by east. The Thordis was steaming at about 5 knots,
her maximum being 10 \ knots. A heavy head sea was run-
ning, and Captain Bell, who was on the bridge, noticed
what he thought to be a periscope on the starboard bow,
twenty or thirty yards away. Then began a contest be-
tween the little steamer and the enemy craft, which ended
in the discomfiture of the latter. Captain Bell instantly
gave instructions for full speed and all hands were ordered
on deck. The submarine crossed the bow of the Thordist
taking up a position thirty or forty yards on her port side.
Shortly afterwards Captain Bell noticed the wake of a
torpedo on the starboard beam. He put the helm
hard over to starboard, the engines in the meantime
going full speed. The Thordis responded well and ran
over the submarine's periscope. Everyone on board the
merchantman heard a crash, and an oily substance was
afterwards noticed on the surface of the water. The sub-
marine was not seen again. The severity of the blow
which the Thordis had dealt the submarine was suggested
by the damage to the keel and propeller, revealed when the
vessel was docked immediately afterwards at Devonport.
The Germans subsequently asserted that the submarine,
though put out of action, had managed to return to port. If
that was so, she must have been badly damaged. The
Admiralty marked their high appreciation of the master's
conduct by conferring on him a commission in the
Royal Naval Reserve, and awarding him the Distinguished
Service Cross, and £200 was distributed among the officers
and men of the ship, Captain Bell — or, rather, Lieutenant
Bell, R.N.R., as he had become — receiving half that sum.1
The month of February furnished another conspicuous
example of British seamanship.! On the 17th the Col-
1 A reward of £500 offered by The Syren and Shipping for the destruction
•f an enemy submarine was also paid to the officers and men of the Thordis.
CH. vn] CAPTAIN FRYATT'S PROMPTITUDE 293
Chester, which had already been under attack, again escaped
from the enemy when on passage from Parkeston Quay to
Rotterdam, Captain Charles A. Fryatt, who afterwards be-
came the victim of one of the foulest crimes committed by
the Germans, having in the meantime succeeded to the com-
mand. During a southerly gale, with heavy seas and thick
rain, a submarine was sighted about two miles ahead of the
ship. The submarine was steering about W.S.W. and the
British vessel E. J S. Captain Fryatt had only a moment
in which to decide what he should do. In a report to the
British Consulate at Rotterdam he explained how, by
prompt action, he had saved his ship : " I at once altered
my ship's course until her head was north-west by the com-
pass on the bridge, so I brought the submarine right astern
of me, and I ordered the chief engineer to get all the steam
he could and get all the speed he could with the engines,
and after about fifteen minutes steaming north-west, I
lost sight of the submarine in the thick rain. I then
brought my ship gradually back to her course again
E. J S., and proceeded on my passage, and I never saw
the submarine again."
During March and April the enemy campaign was evi-
dently conducted with all his available resources, the officers
commanding submarines apparently receiving instructions
to use their torpedoes freely, discharging them without
warning, and without consideration for the lives of British
seamen, who had treated all previous threats and acts
with contempt. No fewer than sixty-seven ships were
attacked by submarines during that period. Aircraft were
also called in aid to intensify the sense of terror which it
was intended to create, and ten vessels were bombed by aero-
planes near the North Hinder and Galloper light- vessels.
But of the ships attacked, all those which were molested
by aircraft, as well as thirty-five which attracted the
attention of submarines, escaped, in addition to a mined
ship, which was towed in, and a merchantman which a
Turkish torpedo-boat vainly chased in the Mediterranean.
It is difficult to judge the motives which inspire a
nation's policy in time of war, but there are indications
which suggest that the Germans anticipated that the
aeroplane, or seaplane, would prove a valuable comple-
ment to the submarine in closing the North Sea against
Allied merchantmen. It was only when the new ruthless,
294 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
submarine policy had failed to intimidate British seamen
that attacks by enemy aircraft began. The first ship to
be molested was the Blonde (613 tons; master, Mr. A.
B. Milne), on her way from Cowes to the Tyne in ballast.
On the morning of March 15th the ship was about three
miles to the eastward of the North Foreland, when
the second mate, who was on the bridge, noticed an
aeroplane approaching from the east. The master at
the time was down below looking for a screwdriver, as
was afterwards explained, when he heard the sound of
an explosion which caused him to run to the engine-room
door, thinking that something was wrong with the engines.
The engineer had reached the same conclusion, and im-
mediately stopped the engines. This officer was engaged
in searching for the damage when the second mate, running
along the deck, called out that an aeroplane of enemy
nationality was dropping bombs. It was a novel ex-
perience for these seamen, who had certainly never given
a thought to such a possibility — representing a fresh
menace to navigation. Captain Milne at once gave orders
for full speed. The first two bombs fell about twenty feet
astern, exploding on reaching the water, and the next
about the same distance ahead. During this attack
on the vessel, the aeroplane circled about the ship, en-
deavouring to get immediately above her. The fifth
bomb was dropped even closer on the starboard side.
The utmost endeavours of the airmen, however, failed.
Captain Milne, realising his danger, adopted a zigzag
course, and in the meantime kept his whistle blowing.
His distress call attracted the attention of a trawler, a
single shot from which caused the aeroplane to disappear.
The Elfland (4,190 tons), a Belgian relief ship, was at-
tacked in very similar circumstances off the North Hinder
on the 21st, and the Lestris (1,384 tons) fourteen miles
east of the Galloper on the same day, when the Pandion
(1,279 tons) was also bombed without result. On the two
following days the Osceola (393 tons) and the Teal
(764 tons) shared the same experience. The Ousel (1,284
tons) was attacked on the 29th, and the Staffa (1,008
tons) on the 30th.
On April llth the Serula (1,388 tons) was exposed to
a determined attack, two machines concentrating on
Jier. The ship was five miles west of the North Hinder
CH. vn] ATTACKED BY SEAPLANES 295
light- vessel at 3.50 p.m., when a seaplane of large size
and one smaller machine appeared. The large one was
first seen coming down towards the ship from high up
on the starboard side abaft the beam, and dropped a small
bomb showing a white trail of smoke, followed by three
bombs which fell just before the bridge on the starboard
side. The undismayed master (Mr. J. T. Sharp) ordered
the helm to be put hard aport. Shortly afterwards three
more bombs came down on the port side, also on the fore-
side of the bridge, distant about twenty-five feet. The
smaller machine, following the example of the larger one,
started to come lower down to co-operate in the attack,
but, being met with rifle fire from the ship, she straightened
up and flew across, dropping bombs on each side of the
vessel. The two machines then proceeded aft, on the port
side, turned, and came back together, evidently with the
intention of dropping bombs all along the steamer. The
ship's course was altered backwards and forwards from
port to starboard, so as to confuse the airmen. At last
Captain Sharp got both machines on the starboard side,
and then the helm was put hard aport and the engines
full astern. Both airmen dropped their bombs on the
port side forward.
So far the enemy airmen had failed, but they were not
discouraged. The machines again went aft and attacked
a third time. On this occasion they came singly and
dropped bombs on each side of the bridge, doing no damage
to the ship. On the last occasion the smaller aeroplane,
on passing over the vessel, appeared to have been struck
by the rifle fire which was then being maintained from the
Serula, as she tilted up, then recovered herself, and flew
directly away to the south with part of the left wing hang-
ing down. The larger seaplane remained around the ship
for about ten minutes longer, and then, passing over a
Dutch ship which was close by, disappeared to the south-
ward. The attack lasted from 3.50 to 4.30, and twelve
shots were fired at the two machines, one rocket distress
signal also being sent up. Later events suggested that
the Germans regarded these attempts with aircraft as
unsatisfactory, and this conclusion reacted on their policy,
for such attacks were in future spasmodic — mere casual
incidents of the war in the North Sea.
To return to the submarine campaign, the fact that so
296 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
large a proportion of the vessels attacked made good
their escape from under-water craft was evidently noted
by the German Naval Staff. Hitherto crowded passenger
liners had not been interfered with, but the failure
of the campaign during March and April to realise the
expectations formed in Berlin was to lead to a change of
policy in this respect. During the first week of March
the enemy secured only one vessel — the Bengrove (3,840
tons), which was destroyed five miles north-north-east
from Ilfracombe on the 7th. During the same period
three other vessels succeeded in escaping — the Wrexham
(1,414 tons) in the North Sea on March 2nd ; iheiNingchow
(9,021 tons) in the Bristol Channel on the 4th ; and the
Lydia (1,138 tons) in the English Channel on the 5th.
The experience of the Wrexham attracted the attention
of the Admiralty owing to the spirited manner in which
the enemy was eluded. The Wrexham (master, Mr.
Charles A. Fryatt)1 was one of the Great Eastern
Railway Company's vessels, running between Harwich
and Rotterdam, and this further attack on a ship of this
line supports the belief that the enemy was endeavouring
to cut communications between England and Holland.
The submarine appeared at thirty-five minutes after noon
on March 2nd, when the Wrexham was approximately
in lat. 51° 50' N., long. 3° 0' E. The enemy circled
to the northward, and then made towards the British
ship. Captain Fryatt immediately altered course to
south-east by south, and ordered the engineer to increase
speed to the utmost. Deck hands were mustered and sent
below to assist the firemen, everyone realising that a chase
for life had begun. Under ordinary conditions the Wrex-
ham was capable of about 14 knots. But, in the face of
such a peril, she was soon travelling at nearly 16 knots
through the heavy, northerly swell. In these circum-
stances the chase continued, the submarine in the
meantime flying imperative signals. Though the weather
was fine and clear, Captain Fryatt kept his ship so far
away that the signals could not be read. No doubt they
were calling upon him to stop, but this was the last thing
he had in his mind, as the Wrexham slowly drew away
1 Captain Fryatt (whose spirited action on February 17th has already
been mentioned) was taken prisoner by the Germans on June 23rd, 1916,
when in command of s.s. Brussels, and afterwards shot.
CH. vn] SEAMANSHIP AND PLUCK 297
from the submarine. The British skipper had to exhibit
a high standard of seamanship owing to the proximity
of the Schouwen Bank on his starboard hand. The
course was altered time after time so as to keep the enemy
on the port beam (abaft), and at a distance of about one
and a half miles. For about forty miles the Germans
maintained the chase, and only abandoned it when the
Wrexham had approached within a mile of the Maas
light-vessel. The incident provided a fine demonstration
of British seamanship and British pluck. In making his
report to his owners, Captain Fryatt remarked : " Had
it not been for the good work put in by the engineers
and the men firing, and the speed they were thus able
to get up, I could not have escaped, as the submarine was
doing well over 14 knots and chased us for about forty
miles, only giving up when we were safe in Dutch waters."
The Admiralty commended the conduct of the master,
officers, and crew of the Wrexham, laying special emphasis
on the spirit exhibited by the engine-room com-
plement ; the chief engineer, Mr. F. A. Goddison, was
" mentioned " in the London Gazette.
Throughout the remainder of the month the enemy
maintained a vigorous attack upon merchant shipping,
alike in the North Sea, in the Irish Sea, and in the English
Channel. Two ships were sunk without warning on March
9th — the Princess Victoria (1,108 tons ; master, Mr. John
Cubbin), sixteen miles north-west by north from Liverpool
Bar light- vessel ; and the Blackwood (1,230 tons ; master,
Mr. John Souter), eighteen miles south-west by south from
Dungeness. On the same day the Tangistan (3,738 tons)
foundered nine miles north from Flamborough Head. The
sinking of the last ship was accompanied by the heaviest
loss of life which had hitherto occurred, whether due to
enemy cruiser, submarine, or mine. The Tangistan was
on passage from Ben-isaf to Middlesbrough with a cargo
of iron ore. The voyage from the Mediterranean had been
like scores of other voyages which the crew had previously
made ; they had seen no enemy ships, and they had run
into no mines. As the ship approached Middlesbrough,
it was realised that she was early for the tide, so speed
was reduced. Night fell, and all on board were anticipating
their early arrival in port, when suddenly the ship
trembled from end to end and then stopped. The hour
298 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
of midnight was just striking ; the lights went out. All
hands rushed up on deck, to find the Tangistan was rapidly
sinking under their feet. There was little or no confusion
as orders were shouted from the bridge for the boats to
be lowered. Before this could be done, however, the
tragedy was completed ; the Tangistan, on an even keel,
disappeared in the dark waters, with all on board. Several
of the men came to the surface, and cries rang out in the
night, but only one of them survived the night's horror — a
seaman named J. C. Toole. He managed to secure a
spar, and he clung to it in desperation as offering him the
only hope of life. Benumbed with the cold, he noticed
the other voices around him were soon silenced, and he
remained the lonely survivor of the whole ship's company !
All he could do was to shout in the hope that he might
attract the attention of some passing steamer, and this
he did with all his remaining strength. One ship had
passed in the night soon after he had reached the surface,
and then he descried yet another vessel, but failed to
attract her attention. Three times hope of rescue was
excited, but each time the desperate man was disappointed.
He had been in the water for two hours when at last the
s.s. Woodville passed near him, heard his cries, now faint
with increasing exhaustion, and picked him up. He was
afterwards landed at West Hartlepool. Of the crew of
thirty-nine, consequently, only one man survived to tell
the tale of the loss of the Tangistan. Whether the Tangi-
stan was, as in the case of the Princess Victoria and
Blackwood, the victim of a submarine, or whether she
exploded a mine, was a matter of some doubt, but it
is significant that " Die Deutschen U-Boote in ihrer
Kriegsfiihrung, 1914-18 " claims the Tangistan as a victim
of U12, whose destruction the following day is described
in a later chapter (p. 390).
It was indubitably a submarine which was responsible
for the destruction two days later of the Florazan (4,658
tons; master, Mr. E. J. Cawsey) when fifty-three miles
N.E. J E. from the Longships, the lighthouse which
stands on the rocks off Land's End. In this instance the
violence of the explosion of the torpedo not only gave the
ship a list to port, but lifted the oil lamps in the cabins
from their sockets, with the result that the ship was soon
ablaze amidships as she began to settle slowly by the head.
CH. vn] THE "ADENWEN'S" ADVENTURE 299
Fortunately the steam drifter Wenlock, then about two
miles away, noticed that the Florazan was in distress,
and rescued all the officers and men, who in the meantime
had taken to the boats, with the exception of one fireman,
who was presumably killed by the explosion. The survivors
stood by the burning vessel for two or three hours, but it
was impossible to board her on account of the flames,
and, no sign of life being observable, the Wenlock con-
tinued on her course. On the following day the Florazan
was still afloat and was taken in tow by eight drifters,
but she sank on the morning of the 18th.
On the same day the Adenwen (3,798 tons) had a curious
experience off the Casquets. In the early morning light,
submarine U29 appeared, and firing rockets ordered the
merchantman to stop. The master (Mr. W. H. Ladd)
paid no attention to what was intended to be a peremptory
injunction, but, on the contrary, increased speed and
steered varying courses in order to keep the submarine
right astern. Again the signals were made, and again
they were ignored. But the chase was a hopeless one,
for the submarine had the advantage of speed and soon
overhauled the Adenwen. Speaking through a mega-
phone, the commander of U29 threatened to torpedo the
ship unless she was stopped. There was no alternative
but compliance with this order. In a few minutes the
crew had taken to the boats, and a German party pro-
ceeded on board the Adenwen and placed bombs in the hold,
which subsequently exploded. The crew were towed by
the submarine for some time, and were then transferred
to the Norwegian s.s. Bothnia, which landed them at
Brixham the same afternoon. The enemy assumed that
the British ship would sink, but, on the contrary, she
remained afloat, was noticed by the French destroyer
CLAYMORE later in the day, and, having been towed
into Cherbourg and temporarily repaired, arrived at
Cardiff on April 1st, to be taken later on into the Admiralty
service.
The campaign continued on the 12th, when five ships
were attacked, four being sunk. One, the Invergyle (1,794
tons ; master, Mr. D. K. Minto), was torpedoed off the
Tyne, and the other three in the neighbourhood of the
Scilly Islands. This group consisted of the Headlands
(2,988 tons), the Indian City (4,645 tons; master, Mr.
300 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
John Williams), and the Andalusian (2,349 tons; master,
Mr. L. Malley), and they were all sunk by the U29 under
the redoubtable Otto Weddigen. As in the case of the
three armoured cruisers ABOUKIR, CRESSY, and HOGUE,
this officer profited by the code of humanity which
the seamen of the great maritime Powers had always
hitherto observed. The s.s. Headlands was entering
the English Channel from the west when the master
(Mr. Herbert Lugg) saw a burning ship about five miles
away to the eastward. Without a thought except for the
men of the vessel from which the smoke was rising, he
altered course in the hope that he might be able to save the
lives of brother seamen. He had been steaming towards
the mass of smoke for a matter of twenty minutes, when
he observed a submarine approaching him at full speed.
In the track of the submarine was a patrol-boat, and inter-
mittently flashes of gunfire reminded him that in obeying
the humane custom of the sea he had run into danger.
When his own ship had disappeared, he learnt that the U29
had attacked the Indian City, which had been torpedoed
when the patrol-boat came on the scene. As the Indian
City, which did not sink until the following day, was in
no immediate danger, the patrol-vessel had given chase
to the submarine. By keeping on the surface, at the risk
of being hit by a shell, the German commander was able
to outdistance his pursuer. As soon as Captain Lugg
realised the danger, he put his helm hard astarboard
in the hope of avoiding pursuit. Owing to the Headlands9
slow speed, it was soon apparent that his case was hopeless.
The merchant ship was still holding to her course when
the submarine commander drew up close astern and shouted
to the Headlands to stop. The challenge was unheeded.
The submarine then manoeuvred for position and fired a
torpedo, which struck the Headlands abaft the engine-room.
The ship began to settle down as the submarine, with a group
of patrol vessels in pursuit, made off at high speed. Within
a few minutes everyone on board the Headlands had taken
to the boats, which were afterwards towed into port by
a patrol craft.1
1 On March 18th, 1915, Otto Weddigen, who, as a reward for his
successes, had been promoted from U9 to U29 since he began his raids
on commerce, attempted to attack one of the battle squadrons of
the Grand Fleet, and was appropriately rammed and sunk by H.M.S.
DREADNOUGHT — " Picked up on her ram like a winkle on a pin," as an
CH. vn] A GUNNERY DUEL 301
On the following day the Hartdale (3,839 tons ; master,
Mr. Thomas Martin), after being chased off the coast of
County Down, was torpedoed, two lives being lost. Four
ships were attacked on the 14th ; none was sunk, and all
managed to escape uninjured except the Atalanta (519
tons). This ship was the first defensively armed British
merchantman to fall in with a submarine. She was on
passage from Galway to Glasgow, and was steaming about
eleven miles off Inishturk Island, which lies about half-way
between Blacksod Bay and Styne Head, when she sighted a
submarine which was coming up astern and gaining rapidly
on her. The master (Mr. J. MacLarnon) decided to withhold
his fire. But when the submarine had come within a
range of three or four thousand yards, the marine gunners
could be restrained no longer and action was opened, the
submarine replying with guns and rifle. By the time four
rounds had been fired by the Atalantcfs gunners, the ship
stopped, rolling heavily in the swell. The submarine, con-
cluding that the short chase was over, came abreast of her
on the port beam. As the 12-pounder gun could not be
brought to bear owing to the ship having stopped, Private
Gilgallon blew away a davit by gunfire ; three more rounds
were then fired, causing the submarine to submerge. Ac-
cording to a statement subsequently made by the two
marine gunners, the boats had in the meantime been
lowered; officers and crew got into them and rowed
away from the ship, with the exception of Mr. Mackey,
first mate, who remained on the bridge and rang orders
to the engine-room for steam until it was found that all
the men had left ; and, as the vessel was now helpless,
and the submarine appeared to be preparing to discharge a
torpedo at short range from a position in which she could
not be fired on, the mate and two marines got into a boat
which was lying alongside and shoved off. According to
the report of the chief engineer, Mr. James Fraser, the
master, after he had got into the port boat, went on board
the Atalanta again, and while he was there the submarine
appeared on the starboard bow. "When the boat got
round the starboard side and the master got on deck,
eyewitness expressed it. This incident, one of the most striking in the
whole history of submarine warfare, was kept secret from the Germans,
who never tired of inquiring the fate of Otto Weddigen, though thousands
of people in and out of the Grand Fleet must have known the facts*
302 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
he called on those in the boat to go on board, but those
who had the oars would not pull back." Captain Mac-
Larnon then left the ship with the rest of the hands.
The crew were eventually landed at Inishturk Island.
In the meantime the enemy devoted attention to the ship,
which was soon well afire. She was subsequently found
adrift by the patrol-boat Greta and towed into Cleggan
Bay, about ten miles to the southward, where, already
gutted by the flames, she was beached.
During the remainder of the month of March the cam-
paign was pressed by the enemy with energy and eleven
ships were lost, together with 115 lives. Eighteen other
vessels were attacked, but • managed to escape. None
of these ships possessed any armament, but owed their
safety in most cases to speed and good seamanship. A
typical illustration of resourcefulness under adverse con-
ditions was furnished by the master (Mr. John Home)
of the Hyndford (4,286 tons). The Hyndford was on her
way home from Bahia with a cargo of wheat and oats.
On the afternoon of March 15th she was steaming up-
Channel at full speed, making for London, and when about
twelve miles south of Beachy Head an explosion occurred.
The weather was fine and there was a smooth sea. The
ship shook from end to end. On rushing out of the chart-
house, the master encountered a great volume of falling
water and debris. After a moment's delay he was, how-
ever, able to reach the bridge in time to see the wake of
a submarine, with its periscope showing. The enemy vessel
was going away from the ship in a south-westerly direction,
and soon disappeared beneath the water. The second
officer had also seen the periscope, and there was no doubt,
therefore, that the vessel had been attacked by a sub-
marine without warning. The outrage was so unexpected
that considerable confusion occurred on board the
Hyndford. As the ship's head was sinking fast, the
engineers left the engine-room, and the crew were hurrying
towards the boats, which had already been swung out,
when the master took command of the situation. He
immediately directed that the boats were not to be
lowered, but, owing to an accident, the port lifeboat slipped
and two hands were thrown into the water. Captain Home
then endeavoured to calm the men and ordered an engineer
to stop the engines. As soon as way was sufficiently off
CH. vn] THE u LIZZIE'S " RESCUE WORK 303
the ship, a boat was put out to rescue the two men who
had fallen into the water, and one of them was, in fact,
saved. Gradually more or less normal conditions were
established on board. In the meantime it had been found
that water in the fore hold was at sea-level, but No. 2 hold
was dry, so, firing two rockets of distress, Captain Home
put his engines half speed ahead for ten minutes as a test,
and, finding the bulkhead stood the strain, he proceeded
at full speed towards the Downs, filling the after ballast
tanks in order to trim the ship. The Hyndford arrived
at the Downs half an hour after midnight on March 16th,
and eventually was towed to Gray's Flats and beached
for temporary repairs.
The attack on the Delmira (3,459 tons) on the 25th
attracted the special attention of the Admiralty owing
to the pluck and resource exhibited by Mr. Jonathan
Evans, the master of the s.s. Lizzie (802 tons). The
Delmira had a crew of thirty-two hands, but only eight
of these were English, the rest being Chinese. She was
proceeding from Boulogne to Port Talbot, and was twenty-
three miles north-north-east from Cape d'Antifer, when the
U37 appeared aft at a distance of about two miles. The
master of the large British merchant ship (Mr. William
Lancefield) took no notice of a signal directing him to
stop, and the Germans then began firing and gradually
gained on the Delmira, which was making only about
9 knots. The usual procedure was followed, but in this case
the commander of the U-boat showed consideration for
the officers and men. He volunteered to tow their boats
until some vessel was met with to which they could transfer.
For an hour and a half the little procession, consisting
of the submarine and the three boats of the Delmira,
maintained its course towards the English coast, and then
the s.s. Lizzie appeared to the eastward. The submarine
immediately cut the tow and began to dive in the direction of
the Lizzie. The master of the little British vessel promptly
steamed full speed towards the submarine with the intention
of ramming her. The Lizzie passed over the enemy vessel,
but felt no shock, and it is doubtful if even the periscope
was struck. In spite of the danger which the presence
of the enemy boat must have suggested, Captain Evans
of the Lizzie stopped his ship and picked up the men out
of the three boats, who were eventually landed at Ports-
21
304 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
mouth. The Delmira grounded later on at Cape La Hogue,
where temporary repairs were carried out.
By this time evidence was accumulating of the deter-
mination of the enemy to break, if he could, the spirit of
British merchant seamen, while, on the other hand, the
stories that reached the Admiralty bore testimony to the
dogged courage with which these men, in face of unparal-
leled dangers, continued to go about the nation's business.
Almost every incident suggested that no amount of fright-
fulness on the part of the enemy would succeed in terroris-
ing the descendants of the men who had thrown open the
navigation of the seas freely to the nations of the world.
The record of these days of heroic resistance to a cruel
campaign must be studied in the knowledge that these
men, untrained for the violence of war, were also, for the
most part, unprovided with armament to enable them to
defend themselves and their vessels against craft possessing,
in addition to the powers of submergence, powerful guns,
deadly torpedoes, and easily portable bombs. It was an
unequal contest, but British seamen pursued it with
high courage and tenacity. The official records reveal
the generous feeling of admiration excited in naval officers
serving at the Admiralty as tale after tale came in from
the sea.
A particularly noteworthy story is that of the Vosges
(1,295 tons). She was on passage from Bordeaux to
Liverpool, carrying a general cargo, with two first-class
passengers and five consular passengers, when she was
attacked on March 27th, 1915, at 10.15 a.m., by a German
submarine in lat. 50° 27', long. 6° W. The merchant-
man was unarmed. Immediately the submarine came
into view the master (Mr. John R. Green) ordered all
the firemen below and asked the consular passengers to
volunteer to assist in maintaining steam pressure. This
aid was willingly given. A fight was in prospect that made
the blood course freely through the veins of every man
on board. The submarine opened fire from astern, the
first shot being immediately followed by one which hit
the British vessel aft. In the meantime the Vosges
was steaming at her highest speed, Captain Green altering
course as necessary to keep the enemy behind him, and
with her head to the sea, so that she could not use her gun.
On the other hand, the submarine was all the time en-
CH. vii] A GALLANT STRUGGLE 305
deavouring to get on the beam of the merchantman, so as
to obtain a good target for his torpedoes. This manoeuv-
ring and counter-manoeuvring continued for an hour
and a half, the enemy, firing as opportunity offered,
refusing to abandon her quarry. The British vessel was
struck repeatedly by shells, a round hole about two feet
in diameter being made in the starboard side, and another
about one foot in diameter being pierced on the starboard
quarter ; there were other small holes about the waterline
aft. The funnel was riddled, the bridgehouse smashed,
and the engine-room badly holed. The chief engineer,
Mr. Harry Davies, was killed instantaneously when
standing near the stokehold door exhorting the firemen
and volunteers to further efforts, a shell striking him in
the chest. The second mate was hit on the arm while
on the bridge ; a fireman was injured in the wrist ; the
mess-room boy had a leg hurt ; the mate was slightly
wounded in the hand ; and splinters grazed the captain's
hand. Among the passengers, the only injury suffered
was in the case of a lady who was struck in the foot.
At about a quarter to twelve, the submarine, having
failed to effect her purpose owing to the skill of Captain
Green and the manner in which he was supported in the
engine-room, sheered off. It was hoped that it would be
possible to get the damaged vessel into Milford Haven.
Water, however, was gaining rapidly on the pumps,
and it became evident that the ship was sinking. At
this moment, the armed yacht Wintonia (Lieutenant-
Commander W. E. Kelway, R.N.R.) was sighted about
twenty -two miles north-west of Trevose Head. This
vessel immediately bore down on the Vosges, and shortly
afterwards the boats were manned and lowered, and,
by the captain's orders, officers and men took their
places. There was no fuss or excitement in spite of
the unnerving experience through which everyone on
board had so recently passed. After making sure that
everyone else had left the ship, Captain Green cast
off both painters, and, getting into the starboard lifeboat,
rowed over to the patrol yacht. In spite of the strong
wind and heavy rain, everyone got on board — a difficult
operation in the circumstances. " The only remark I have
to make," Captain Green reported, " is that, had I had a
gun, I have not the slightest doubt but that I should have
306 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
sunk the submarine." The Vosges disappeared bow first
at 2 o'clock after an explosion had occurred. " Gentlemen,
I did not give her away," the captain concluded in his
report to his owners. The Admiralty, on receiving in-
formation, at once expressed their appreciation of the
conduct of all concerned, it being remarked that " the
chief engineer, both by his energy and his example, was
largely instrumental in enabling the vessel to shake off
the submarine." Official appreciation was afterwards
formally expressed of the gallantry of officers and crew :
Captain Green was awarded a commission in the Royal
Naval Reserve and received the D.S.O. for " his gallant
and resolute conduct " ; gold watches were presented
to the other officers, the widow of chief engineer Harry
Davies receiving the gold watch which would have been
handed to her husband if he had lived ; and the members
of the crew were paid a gratuity of £3 each.
A duel lasting ninety minutes between an old British
merchant ship and a German submarine occurred at this
period of the war, reflecting the utmost credit on British
seamanship. The City of Cambridge was a four-masted
ship of 3,844 tons, and her compound engines gave her a
normal speed when loaded of about 10 knots. She was
thirty-three years old, having been built by Messrs. Work-
men, Clark & Co. at Belfast in 1882. She left Alexandria
for Liverpool on March 16th with a general cargo. The
master (Mr. Alfred C. Fry) was determined not to be
caught unprepared for an emergency, and on the 27th he
mustered all hands at their respective boat stations in
order that every officer and man should practise putting
on his life-belt in its proper position, " for, believe me,"
Captain Fry afterwards remarked, " familiarity breeds
contempt, and there are numbers of persons on board
most ships who do not know how to put on life-belts
properly." Strong north-east winds were encountered in
crossing the Bay, and at 4.30 on the following afternoon,
the City of Cambridge passed Bishop Rock at a distance
of about thirty-eight miles, and course was then altered
to pass about twenty miles west of the Smalls, to the
westward of Milford Haven. At noon Captain Fry had
doubled the lookout, and he " kept his eye skinned "
for any suspicious craft or for the sight of a periscope.
At 6.30, nothing being observable on the horizon, he
CH. vii] BAFFLING A SUBMARINE 307
left the bridge to go down to dinner, the third
officer with the lookout men and the man at the wheel
remaining on the bridge. He had just sat down with
the chief and second officers, when a sharp report was
heard on the starboard side of the vessel. " I raced
from the table to the bridge," he stated in his subsequent
narrative of events, " and did it, I think, in record time-
say fifteen seconds. I climbed the port ladder and rushed
to the wheel. Looking over the side, I saw close to us,
say half a ship's length away, the conning tower of a
submarine with several men in it. She was heading the
same way as ourselves. I at once myself pulled the wheel
over to the starboard, shaking them up below at the same
time; then, knowing that the bridge would be fired at,
I lay flat for a minute. The chief and second officers
were with me by this time, and the second officer took
the wheel and kept it for the rest of the time of our trial.
After a short time I looked for the enemy/and found that
he was a couple of points or so on the starboard quarter
and our own ship swinging off good to port. This gave
us courage and the hope that he would not have it all
his own way ; if we could only keep her going and the
enemy astern, we had a good chance of getting away,
unless holed below the water-line. As soon as he under-
stood we were going to make a try for it, he fired a shell,
and then for an hour and a half it was very hot work.
He would gain on us till one could count the heads in
the conning tower. At one time I think he could not have
been 200 feet from us, a mass of foam with just the top
of the tower showing, and then he was hard aport or star-
board (generally port) till he stood at right angles, trying
to get far enough out to smash the bridge, at the same
time he was shepherding us so that we were before the
wind and swell, which, although it was small, probably upset
his shooting platform. We managed to baffle him at
every move. At one time I was afraid our speed was
going down, but with the best of firemen below and the
mighty efforts of the engineers, we recovered speed and
worked her up to a little over 13 knots (our top speed).
At this time we were heading into both wind and sea
(he had forced us to turn round the compass twice) and
going slowly away from him. The light by now had
settled into a bright moonlight night, and as he got
308 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
farther astern we gradually lost sight of him, but he gave
us one parting shot, which did a lot of damage.
" That ninety minutes was such as I do not wish to
experience again. Thinking it possible that some of our
armed ships might be within range, I fired two distress
signals one after another to attract their attention. Then
he brought a Morse lamp on deck and started Morsing,
but knowing this was only a trick to divert our attention,
I took no notice of it."
For the courage and resource exhibited in face of the
enemy, Captain Fry was presented with a gold watch
from the Admiralty as well as Lloyd's Medal, and was
commended in the London Gazette, besides receiving a
reward from the War Risks Association. Though his
ship was entirely without armament, he had opposed his
seamanship to all the offensive qualities possessed by the
submarine, and, splendidly supported by his officers and
the staff in the engine-room, he had won. The devotion
of the master, officers, and engineers saved the ship and
its cargo, but the City oj Cambridge did not escape unin-
jured. One German shell carried away a 6j-inch davit,
destroying the boat which it helped to support. Another
penetrated the boatswain's room and part of the lamp
locker, one of these holes being about 30 inches by 50 inches.
The after-works were injured, and one shell which passed
over the bridge carried away the signal halyard. " This
was a close call," Captain Fry remarked, " as, had it struck
any of the short awning spars, it would have exploded,
and that would have finished us." Except for a slight
splinter wound sustained by a fireman, no one was the
worse for the encounter. " With a bit of luck and owing
to the hard determination of the officers and men above
and below deck," the master related afterwards, " we
managed to bring our ship home." l
Another incident which occurred in the closing days of
March must be noted, because, apart from the loss of life
involved, it figured in the Notes which afterwards passed
between the Government of the United States and Germany,
and was the subject of a special inquiry by the Board
of Trade. When approximately sixty miles W. J N.
1 The City of Cambridge, after a second escape from a submarine in
the same year, was sunk in the Mediterranean (July 3rd, 1917) when
under the command of another master.
CH. vn] STORY OF THE " FALABA " 309
off St. Ann's Head at 12.30 p.m. on March 27th, the
master (Mr. George Wright) of the Eileen Emma, who was
fishing from Milford Haven, sighted the periscope of a
submarine. He immediately rang for full speed and tried
to cut her off. The enemy, realising what was happening,
altered course again and again, trying to avoid collision.
The speeds of the two ships were about equal, and for some
time these manoeuvres continued, until a steamer appeared
on the horizon steering south-west. The submarine then
increased her buoyancy until she was well above the water,
and in this trim outpaced the Eileen Emma and proceeded
towards a steamship which proved to be the Falaba
(4,806 tons ; master, Mr. F. J. Davies). She was unarmed,
and had on board a crew of ninety-five men and 147
passengers, including seven women and an American
citizen, when she left Liverpool on the previous evening
on her passage to Sierra Leone. Passengers and crew had
had insufficient time to adjust themselves to war condi-
tions when they sighted the submarine about two points
abaft the starboard beam and three miles distant. In
approaching the Falaba the submarine at first showed a
British ensign, for which the German colours were after-
wards substituted. She was noticed by Mr. Pengilly, the
Falaba9 s third officer, at 11.40 a.m. The sequence of
later events was settled by the considered judgment of
Lord Mersey, acting as Wreck Commissioner :
" The captain immediately altered the course of the
Falaba so as to get the submarine directly astern, and
at the same time he rang up the engine-room to in-
crease the speed. The best was done in the engine-
room to respond to this call, but it was found impossible
to effect any material improvement in the short time
available. The captain then sent Baxter to instruct
the Marconi operator to signal all stations as follows :
' Submarine overhauling us ; flying British flag. 51° 32',
6° 86'.' This message was sent out at 11.50 a.m. Baxter
then obtained a telescope and observed that the sub-
marine was flying a German ensign. It is, in my
opinion, uncertain whether the ensign had been changed,
or whether the ensign already observed was not, in
fact, a German flag. The point, however, is not material,
because from the first the captain believed the submarine
310 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
to be an enemy craft. The submarine was at this time
making about 18 knots and was rapidly overhauling the
Faldba. Shortly before noon she fired a detonating signal
to call attention, and by flags signalled the Faldba to ' stop
and abandon ship.' The Faldba did not stop, but still
manoeuvred to keep the submarine astern. The submarine
then signalled ' Stop or I fire.' The captain and the chief
officer then conferred and decided that it was impossible
to escape. They accordingly rang to the engine-room
to stop the engines. The signal ' Stop or I fire ' was given
a minute or two before noon. The submarine then sig-
nalled ' Abandon ship immediately,' and hailed through a
megaphone to the Faldba to take to the boats, as they were
going ' to sink the ship in five minutes.' The captain
answered that he was taking to the boats. The Marconi
operator heard the hail, and sent out a second message,
' Position 51° 32' N., 6° 36' W. ; torpedo ; going boats/
The warning that the submarine was going to sink the ship
in five minutes was given as nearly as possible at noon.
The Faldba stopped at 12.4 or 12.5, and at 12.10 the sub-
marine fired a torpedo into her. At this moment the sub-
marine was within about 100 yards of the Faldba. The
torpedo struck the Faldba on the starboard side by No. 3
hatch aft of No. 1 lifeboat and just alongside the Mar-
coni house. The blow was fatal. The Faldba at once
took a list to starboard, and in eight minutes (namely,
at 12.18) she sank. This was within twenty minutes
of the notice from the submarine of her intention to sink
the ship. An affidavit by Mr. Baxter, the chief officer,
which had been put in has satisfied me that no rockets
or other signals were fired or shown from the Faldba on
March 28th."
Lord Mersey held that he was not required to find
whether the submarine was within her rights as an enemy
craft in sinking the Falaba, but he was called upon to as-
sume that " in any event she was bound to afford the men
and women on board a reasonable opportunity of getting
to the boats and of saving their lives. This those in charge
of the submarine did not do. And so grossly insufficient
was the opportunity in fact afforded that I am driven
to the conclusion that the captain of the submarine
desired and designed not merely to sink the ship, but, in
CH. vii] GERMAN BARBARITY 311
doing so, also to sacrifice the lives of the passengers and
crew." The Wreck Commissioner added that evidence
was given by the witnesses of laughing and jeering from
the submarine while the men and women from the Falaba
were struggling in the water, but Lord Mersey stated
that he preferred to hope that the witnesses were mis-
taken. Corporal Turnbull of the Royal Army Medical
Corps, one of the survivors, in a statement to the Press,1
said that " the barbarity of the crew of the submarine
was frightful. They waited to see the last of the Falaba
before they dived, but, of course, they made no attempt
to save any of us. That was not the worst part. The most
maddening thing was to see the crew of the submarine
after they had torpedoed us. The Falaba listed over,
and the passengers and crew were clinging like flies trying
to get a grip of the deck, and dropping one by one into the
water, while the crew of the submarine laughed and jeered
at them." The ascertained loss of life was 104.
Continuing his judgment, Lord Mersey added that,
" between the first signal of the submarine to stop and the
actual stopping of the Falaba, the chief officer directed
the first and second stewards to assemble the passengers
on deck and to tell them to put on their life-belts. The
captain also sent the fourth officer below to see that these
orders were carried out. After the engines were stopped,
the chief engineer and the third engineer ordered all men
in the engine-room and stokehold on deck, and the order
was obeyed. By the time the Falaba was stopped, a
large number of the passengers were already on the boat
deck. The captain was on the bridge. He sent the third
officer and the quartermaster to see to the lowering and
filling of the boats, and the order to man the boats was
passed round the ship." The Wreck Commissioner then
dealt with the " serious complaints which were made by
some of the witnesses as to the condition of the boats
and as to the launching of them." After referring to these
statements and to the technical evidence given before
him, he said that he was satisfied " that the witnesses
who described the boats as having been ' rotten ' are
mistaken, and that, in truth, the boats were sound and
in good order up to the time of the attack by the submarine.
What? however, the witnesses probably mean, when they
* Times, March 30th, 1915,
312 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
say the boats were rotten, is that when afloat some of them
were found to be unseaworthy. And this, no doubt, is
true. But this condition of things was, in my opinion,
wholly due to the damage sustained by the boats after
the operation of launching began, and not to any previous
defect. Upon the subject of the launching, it is, therefore,
necessary to say a few words. It is to be remembered
that the submarine had given the Falaba only about
five minutes in which to man, to fill, and to launch these
boats ; in which, in short, to save the lives of 242 persons.
This was an operation quite incapable of efficient perfor-
mance in anything like that short space of time. There
was unavoidable hurry and disorder ; the falls of one
of the boats slipped : the falls of another jammed ;
some boats were dashed against the side of the ship and
damaged ; one (No. 8) was seriously injured by the ex-
plosion of the torpedo while still hanging from the davits.
It is in these circumstances that some of the witnesses
apparently desire me to find that the damage done to the
boats was due to the neglect of the officers and crew in
connection with the launching. I cannot do this. I
have no doubt that, had there been more time for the
work, it might have been better carried out, but, in my
opinion, all on board — captain, officers, crew, and passengers
— did their very best. People were fighting for their lives
and for the lives of others about them, and in the struggle
the captain, half the crew, and a large number of the pas-
sengers were drowned. It is impossible for me to fix
any man on board the ship with a failure of duty or with
incompetence. The responsibility for the consequences
of this catastrophe must rest exclusively with the officers
and crew of the German submarine."
Two more ships were sunk on the last two days of
March, happily without loss of life. The Flaminian
(3,500 tons ; master, Mr. David Cruikshank) was destroyed
on the 29th by gunfire, fifty miles south-west by west from
the Scilly Isles, and the Crown of Castile (4,505 tons;
master, Mr. T. S. Fyfe) on the 30th, when thirty-one miles
south-west from the Bishop Rock. Submarine U28 was
responsible for the sinking of both vessels.
By the end of March the depredations of enemy surface
craft had ceased, and no further losses on this account were
incurred until the following January ; the mine peril had
CH. vn] A TUG'S PLUCKY FIGHT 313
been for the moment checked ; but the destruction due to
submarines, which had amounted to 17,126 tons in January,
with a loss of twenty-one lives, and had reached only
21,787 tons, with the death of nine persons, in February,
had suddenly jumped up to 64,448 tons, and the number
of lives lost was 161. After this exhibition of frightful-
ness, the intensity of the attack became for a time less
marked. During April only 22,453 tons were destroyed,
thirty-eight lives being lost, and only six other ships
were molested. On the first day of the month the Seven
Seas (1,194 tons ; master, Mr. Barnes) was about six miles
south of Beachy Head when an explosion occurred forward,
the vessel sinking almost immediately. The destroyer
FLIRT picked up nine of the crew, but the captain, chief
engineer, both mates, steward, three seamen and a boy
were drowned. No doubt existed that the ship was
torpedoed without warning. The Lochwood (2,042 tons;
master, Mr. T. H. Scott) fell a victim to the enemy on the
following day off the Start. On the 4th four more lives
were lost in the City of Bremen (1,258 tons ; master, Mr.
Richard Martin), which was destroyed twenty miles south
by west from the Wolf Rock, and the same day the Olivine
(634 tons1; master, Mr. A. Lament) also went down near
St. Catherine's Point. The Northlands (2,776 tons ; master,
Mr. A. S. Taylor) came to a similar end off Beachy Head
on the 5th, and then an interval occurred of four clear
days, the only noticeable incident being the escape of
the tug Homer, which furnished further confirmatory
evidence of the spirit in which British seamen were deter-
mined to meet the enemy's threats and murderous acts.
The Homer (150 tons) was proceeding from Queenstown
to Sunderland towing the French barque General de Santos.
On the afternoon of April 8th, twenty-five miles south-
west by south from the Owers Lightship, a German
submarine approached within three or four hundred yards
of the Homer's port side. The enemy vessel was travelling
on the surface, and hoisted a signal which the master
of the Homer (Mr. H. J. Gibson) ignored, although an
officer in the submarine shouted and pointed at the flags.
The submarine then steamed round the bow of the tug,
speed in the British vessel having in the meantime been
eased. She soon came up on the starboard side, both
vessels steaming in the same direction. A shot was fired
314 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vii
over the Homer and the German officer resumed shouting
in English, ordering Captain Gibson to get into his boat.
The enemy craft, considering the issue practically decided,
came within a hundred yards, and then the Homer, having
cast loose the General de Santos, turned towards her. It
was a critical moment. As soon as the enemy realised
the intention of the master of the Homer, he put his helm
hard aport and opened fire, continuing a desperate attack
until the Homer was almost on top of him, missing his
stern by about three feet. The Homer's head was then
reversed, and, the submarine still firing, the vessel pro-
ceeded in the direction of the Owers. The submarine
followed, firing a torpedo which passed close to the British
vessel's starboard quarter. At this time the Homer was
travelling at about 12 knots. The submarine continued
to chase her for half an hour, but had fallen half a mile
astern when she abandoned the pursuit and turned back,
evidently with the intention of dealing with a French
barque which was in sight. The tug, with seven holes as
evidence of the enemy's persistency, reached Bembridge
some time later. The Admiralty marked their appreciation
of the resource and courage of the master by presenting
him with a gold watch and a letter on vellum.
Five other ships managed to make their escape during
April, La Rosarina (8,332 tons) experiencing a narrow
escape on the 17th, when she was chased by a submarine,
and beat off the attack by gunfire. But during the last
twenty days of April the Harpalyce (5,940 tons), The
President (647 tons ; master, Mr. Neil Robertson), Ptar-
migan (784 tons; master, Mr. W. A. W. Hore), Mobile
(1,950 tons; master, Mr. W. C. Fortune), Cherbury (3,220
tons; master, Mr. James Davidson), and Fulgent (2,008
tons) were all sunk, with loss of life in the case of the
Harpalyce, Ptarmigan, and Fulgent. The end of the
Harpalyce (master, Mr. Wawn) was marked by some
features which appeared particularly revolting to still
tender consciences at that early period of the struggle.
This ship was working for the Commission of Relief
in Belgium. When she left Rotterdam for Norfolk,
Virginia, U.S.A., in addition to her Red Ensign she
was flying the large flag of the Commission, and painted
on her sides in large letters was the name of the Com-
mission. Her status had been recognised by the German
CH. vn] A RELIEF SHIP'S FATE 315
Minister at The Hague, who had issued a safe-conduct,
covering risks from attack by German submarines during
her voyage. This permit was of the most specific character,
but contained a warning "against navigating the waters
declared by Germany to be a war zone," especially through
the English Channel. In those circumstances there should
have been no cause for anxiety. The Harpalyce left Rot-
terdam about 2.30 a.m. on Saturday morning, April 10th,
and all went well until the ship was about seven miles
south-south-east from the North Hinder light-vessel,
when at 10 a.m. a loud report was heard on the starboard
quarter. An explosion had blown in the ship's side.
In less than two minutes the whole of the poop and after-
well deck were submerged. The ship was doomed. Ac-
cording to the statements of the second officer (Mr. W. J.
George) and the second engineer (Mr. J. S. Turnbull),
" It was impossible to swing out the boats, as by now the
top of the funnel was nearly in the water, the engine-
room being filled up and the decks beginning to blow up."
Within a short time the ship went down. The crew
consisted of forty-four officers and men, including thirty-
three Chinese hands. They would all undoubtedly have
been drowned but for the fortunate appearance upon the
scene of the Netherlands s.s. Elizabeth and s.s. Con-
stance Catherine, which, in company with the United States
schooner Ruby, managed to save all but fifteen of the crew.
These neutral vessels not only exhibited fine seamanship
during this rescue work, but illustrated that chivalry of
the sea which, prior to Germany's decision, had united
the seamen of the world. Two possibilities called for
investigation. In the first place, it had to be settled
whether the ship had been sunk by mine or torpedo. As
to that, not only was it improbable that a mine would
strike the vessel on the starboard quarter, as was the case,
but the second mate distinctly saw the periscope of a sub-
marine and its wash as it made off to the northwards;
corroborative evidence on this point was also given by
the master of the Elizabeth. Nor was there any lack of
testimony as to the position in which the Harpalyce was
sunk — well outside the so-called German war zone. No
doubt existed that this vessel, engaged on an errand of
mercy to " the suffering civil population of Belgium,"
to quote from the German permit, was torpedoed without
316 APPEARANCE OF THE SUBMARINE [CH. vn
warning and in broad daylight outside the area designated
by the enemy, although she carried every mark of her
distinctive mission.
The last day of April was marked by a tragedy which,
conspicuous at the moment, was afterwards to be com-
pletely overshadowed by events which focused the at-
tention of the world on the enemy's inhuman campaign.
The Fulgent sailed from Cardiff on the evening of April
28th under Admiralty orders for Scapa Flow. She was
taking a roundabout course for safety, evidently under
orders, and had passed the Blaskets Lighthouse, off the
coast of Kerry, on the morning of April 30th, when
the silence was broken by the report of a gun. It
was then noticed that, unobserved by anyone on board,
a submarine had crept up within about 200 yards of the
Fulgent. The master of the merchantman (Mr. C. W.
Brown) at once realised the peril in which he stood, and
began zigzagging in order to keep the enemy vessel
astern of him and thus in an unfavourable position
for attack. The contest, however, was an unequal one,
as the submarine, stated to be the U7, had the advantage
of speed. Captain Brown, with dogged courage, refused
to believe that his position was hopeless. Even when the
submarine had gained a position about three points on
the port quarter, he continued to handle his ship with
courage and competency. A flash from the gun mounted
on the deck of the submarine told him that a shot had been
fired. A few seconds later the vessel's funnel and chart-
room had been shattered, an A.B. named Williams,
who was at the wheel, being killed, and Captain Brown
himself being mortally injured. The struggle was then
over, and all that could be done was to get out the boats
with all speed, in order that the remaining officers and men
might leave the doomed ship. Without a thought for
the British seamen, the officer commanding the submarine
then sank the Fulgent out of hand and disappeared,
leaving these unfortunate men to whatever fate might
overtake them. During the remainder of the day the
two boats managed to keep together and then night fell,
and in the darkness they got separated. The most slug-
gish imagination can fill in the broad details of the sufferings
of these men as hour after hour passed and hope of rescue
rose and fell as ships appeared on the horizon, to disappear
CH. vn] DESTRUCTION OF THE " FULGENT " 317
again unconscious of these men's distress. But at last,
on Sunday, May 2nd, the s.s. Tosto of Newcastle picked
up the first mate and eight hands, exhausted physically and
mentally by the ordeal through which they had passed,
and the trawler Angle landed nine other men at Cappa
(Kilrush), where the body of Captain Brown was silently
borne ashore.
The destruction of the Fulgent provided an extreme
example of the fate to which at this period the seamen of
torpedoed merchant vessels were liable, and in considering
the first stage of Germany's submarine campaign as here
described it is necessary, in view of the subsequent develop-
ments, to preserve a sense of proportion. Grievous as
were the experiences of crews set adrift in open boats, their
sufferings, generally speaking, were as nothing in comparison
with those endured later in the war by survivors from ships
torpedoed in mid- Atlantic — a phase of the enemy's savage
warfare by sea which is dealt with in the second volume
of this work.
CHAPTER VIII
THE AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK
IN those fateful summer days which immediately preceded
the British ultimatum to Germany little information was
revealed as to the preparations of the Royal Navy. Of
the steps which were taken none was, in fact, more thorough
than the precautions against our fleets being blockaded
by means of a potential enemy's mine-fields. But the
vigilant work of the destroyer flotillas off the coast does not
come within the scope of this history.
Allusion has already been made to the flotilla of old
gunboats, whose duty was to attend on the Grand Fleet,
while the trawlers were relied upon to keep the channels
and harbour approaches swept clear. As far back as
July 28th, 1914, Commander Lionel Preston, R.N.,
had received his orders to take charge of these gunboats
and to assemble them at Dover. On the first day of
August they steamed away from that great national harbour
for Queensferry, having been instructed by Admiral Sir
George Callaghan, then Commander-in-Chief of the Grand
Fleet, to begin sweeping on their way north as soon as
they got to the Inner Dowsing, near the Wash. And
it was on this same day that the inspecting Captain of
Mine-sweepers received his orders in regard to the traw-
lers. The Admiralty had decided to charter these for
mine- sweeping, and preparations were to be made so that
they could be sent to their assigned ports as soon as possible.
There were then eighty-two such vessels on the Ad-
miralty list, and the ranks and ratings of the trawler section
numbered 1,025.
On the next day the Admiralty-chartered trawlers,
which had been usually employed in towing targets, were
ordered to the Nore from their various ports, where,
being completed with mine-sweeping stores, they were
318
CH. vin] THE FIRST MINE-FIELD 319
ready for eventualities. On the coast of Scotland, and at
the fishing ports of the North Sea and West of England,
steam trawlers were being taken in hand as they came in
from their fishing, though it had been foreseen that probably
25 per cent, of these would not have succeeded in getting
back from Iceland and other fishing waters in time for
the commencement of hostilities. Meanwhile Germany
was also availing herself of her fishing fleets, and on
August 3rd, a telegram from the British Ambassador at Berlin
announced that that country had obtained thirty trawlers
from Geestemunde, and was equipping them with a couple
of searchlights each, and fitting them out as mine-layers.
The first mine-field to be discovered was that which was
laid by the KONIGIN LUISE, an auxiliary vessel of the
German Navy resembling one of the steamers that had been
on the service between Harwich and the Hook of Holland.
At ten o'clock on the morning of August 5th she was seen
laying mines not far from Orfordness, and was herself sunk
by the Third Destroyer Flotilla, issuing from Harwich. She
had not quite completed her work when her career so
suddenly terminated, for survivors stated that many mines
were still aboard her. They further asserted that she had
laid a long line of mines from a position in lat. 52° 10' N.,
long. 2° 25' E., to the eastward. This position is about
thirty miles to the eastward of Orfordness, and it is clear
enough that such mines were laid for the express purpose
of sinking any British forces proceeding from Harwich
towards Germany. In this intention they partially
succeeded, for H.M.S. AMPHION foundered on one of them
the next day.
Meanwhile the Senior Naval Officer at Harwich was
ordered to hasten the preparation of the mine-sweeping
trawlers. On August 6th they put to sea and proceeded
to sweep from Orfordness to Southwold. The Admiral
of the patrols was also directed to send Grimsby trawlers
to sweep off Aldeburgh as soon as possible. Nothing
could have given a greater impetus to the work of the traw-
lers than the discovery of a mine-field on the first morning
of the war. From the Firth of Forth, Admiral Lowry,
the Senior Officer on the coast of Scotland, telegraphed
to say that the mine-sweepers which he had taken up
had almost completed their equipment at Queensferry
and Invergordon, and he had given orders that as many
22
320 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
trawlers as possible should be commissioned from the
northern Scottish ports for patrolling the Moray Firth.
Such was the call on the destroyer flotillas that there
was only one torpedo craft patrolling that big bay. To
Devonport, Portsmouth, and Portland urgent telegrams
were dispatched by the Admiralty for the temporary loan
of trawlers for mine-sweeping, and meantime shipping had
been warned that mines had been laid off the Suffolk
coast as far seaward as the third meridian East, and all
vessels were ordered not to enter the North Sea without
calling for orders at a South Coast port.
On the third day of the war, Admiral Sir John Jellicoe
was informed that a permanent mine-sweeping flotilla
of trawlers was being established with a view to ensuring
a clear channel from the Outer Dowsing to the South
Goodwins. This extensive lane would mean that mer-
chant ships could be guaranteed a safe journey from the
eastern entrance of the English Channel almost as far
north as the Humber. The flotilla was to consist of
eighty trawlers, to be formed as vessels became available.
Captain Ellison was summoned to the Admiralty, and
instructed to bring this huge flotilla into being. He was
at the time commanding officer of the HALCYON, the
senior ship of the North Sea Fisheries, based on Lowestoft.
He immediately began to get together suitable fishing-
craft, and in a short time the North Sea became again
a safe highway. The trawlers got to work with such
zeal that by August llth they had swept a channel four
cables wide from as far south as the North Foreland to
as far north as Southwold. From that night, also, the
whole channel from the Outer Dowsing light- vessel to the
Downs began to be patrolled by steam drifters, manned by
Trawler Reserve officers and men and flying the White
Ensign. Night and day, without so much a*? a gun with
which to defend themselves, these little craft kept up
their patrol, ever on the alert against enemy mine-laying
vessels. No one who passed up the North Sea about this
time will ever forget the sight of this continuous patrol
of little vessels engaged on a new sphere of work.
And whilst Lowestoft was busily getting craft together,
Chatham was also rapidly fitting out mine-sweeping trawlers,
so that in about a fortnight seventy-four hired and other
trawlers had been equipped on the Medway. Some of
CH. vni] DRIFTERS ON PATROL 321
these were engaged in sweeping the Thames Estuary ;
others were dispatched to Lowestoft ; some to Peterhead.
These trawlers had been provided with their mine-sweeping
gear, given a month's consumable stores, coal and water,
as well as rifles, ammunition, charts, tide-tables, Morse
lamps, and so on. Free kits had been issued to all deck-
hands and trimmers, and a week's pay advanced. Before
sailing, both skippers and crews had been taken out in
the Admiralty trawlers Seamew or Seaflower and instructed
in sweeping, reeving of gear, and station-keeping.
By the middle of August the special channel from the
Outer Dowsing to the Downs was already buoyed, and
thirty steam drifters, equally spaced, were patrolling it
from end to end. Such duty essentially belonged to our
torpedo flotillas, and not to the smallest type of fishing
steamers, but what did it matter, seeing that the destroyers
and torpedo-boats were wanted elsewhere, and that drifters
were the finest little steamships ever built to withstand
bad weather ? But besides these Lowestoft drifters,
other drifters were being taken up on the north-east
corner of Scotland. From Banff, Fraserburgh, Port
Mahomack, and Wick, they were being speedily sent to sea
to look for mine-layers, and thus afford some protection
to Moray Firth. The task which was imposed on some
of these Scotch crews was anything but safe. They were
unarmed, they were to perform no hostile act, and if
captured were to give no indication of their being in
the Government service. Their duty was simply to pose
as fishermen, keeping their fishing gear on board and their
eyes open. The moment they sighted any suspicious
movement of ships, they were to run into harbour as fast
as they could and report the facts.
At Lowestoft great activity continued. The Com-
mander-in- Chief was calling for more mine-sweeping
trawlers for the North. Eight he wanted to sweep round
Kinnaird Head, in addition to those already sent to Cro-
marty. These were being fitted out at Lowestoft, besides
some more for the Humber and elsewhere. When on
August 15th the Grand Fleet made its sweep down the
North Sea, the mine-sweeping gunboats went ahead of
the battle-cruisers and battleships, leaving the trawlers
to keep clear of mines the approaches to the Grand Fleet's
base, and to sweep the Pentlands daily.
322 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
Notwithstanding the large number of vessels which
had now been taken up, and the speed with which they
were being sent forth on their duties, the demand was
still far in excess of the supply. For towards the end of
August the enemy's mine-layers had been very busy.
On the 27th the steam drifter Barley Rig had been blown
up about thirty-five miles E. \ S. of Blyth, and thus
the existence of the Tyne mine-field was discovered. Two
mine-sweeping trawlers, the Thomas W. Irvine and the
Crathie, were also blown up whilst endeavouring to sweep
this new field. H.M. Torpedo-boat No. 13 found her-
self surrounded by mines, being unable to discover a way
out, and the same day a mine-field was discovered also
off the Humber. On the top of this intelligence came a
request for four trawlers to be sent to Admiral Christian,
who was flying his flag in the EURYALUS, and was engaged
in operations off Ostend. He urgently required sweepers,
as the weather had recently been particularly suitable
for mine-laying. These trawlers were therefore sent to
him; they left Lowestoft in charge of the navigating
officer of the HALCYON, but the next day Captain Ellison
was compelled to request their return, as it was impossible
to carry on without them. On the day that this request
reached Ostend, Admiral Jellicoe was also asking for
twenty more trawlers, and two days later he expressed
a desire for a score of drifters to act as lookouts to
Scapa Flow, since the enemy was now mining the salient
points of the coast.
The mine-sweeping trawlers were doing yeoman service.
Their draught of water, which was in many cases as much
as fifteen feet, made them dangerous to themselves in a
mine-field, but they went about their work with fine dis-
regard of their own peril. Already the Humber trawlers
had been able to sweep from Spurn Head to the Outer
Dowsing, and thus connect up with the swept channel
running down to the North Foreland, ensuring a safe
passage for the heavy traffic from the English Channel
to Hull. In the north, the trawlers based on Granton,
in the Firth of Forth, had swept fifteen miles to the
eastward of St. Abb's Head, and the Scapa trawlers
had swept a channel for the Third Battle Squadron into
Scapa.
It had been suggested that the opening phase of the war
CH. vin] SUBMARINES AND THE GRAND FLEET 323
would be marked by a determined torpedo attack by the
enemy, pushed right into the base where the British Fleet
might be lying, ready to strike. It was urged that enemy
destroyers would rush across the North Sea, penetrate
the British line of patrols, torpedo one or two capital
ships, and then dash out again. Probably a whole division
of German destroyers would be lost in the attempt, but
the loss to the enemy would be well worth the gain.
It is clear that something of this strategy was actually
attempted, but with two differences : First, the attack
was timed to take place only after the first mine-laying
had been carried out ; and, secondly, the torpedoes were
to be fired by submarines and not destroyers. Within
four days of the outbreak of war enemy submarines were
assuredly seeking out the Grand Fleet. Of this there is
no doubt, for on August 8th the battleships MONARCH,
ORION, AJAX, DREADNOUGHT, and IRON DUKE, the last-
named being Admiral Jellicoe's flagship, each reported
having sighted a submarine. It was impossible that the
lookouts of all these ships should have been mistaken,
and their reports were confirmed by the fact that H.M.S.
BIRMINGHAM early the next morning, when off the north-
east coast of Scotland, rammed and sank U15.
It was obvious enough that the Navy could not afford
to take unnecessary risks. Admiral Sir John Jellicoe was
forthwith ordered to move all his heavy ships at once to
the western side of the Orkneys, and a few days later he
expressed the opinion that, when the Grand Fleet went to
sea, its object should be definite, and as soon as that object
was accomplished, it should withdraw ; for the risk of
mines and submarines was not to be regarded lightly.
The enemy had already discovered that Scapa Flow was
the main anchorage of the Grand Fleet, and a base at Loch
Ewe had now to be established.
But that was only a temporary measure. A definite,
settled defensive policy was necessary, and in this respect
the trawlers and their fishing crews were to prove invalu-
able, not merely for mine-sweeping, but in protecting the
Grand Fleet from the stealthy under-sea boat. A fort-
night after hostilities began, on August 17th, the Ad-
miralty decided to form the Northern Trawler Flotilla.
This was to consist of sixteen trawlers, each one fitted with
a modified sweep, and in addition each vessel was to carry a
324 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
couple of 3-pounders. These trawlers were to be based on
Scapa, and to be used for the special service of hunting sub-
marines off the Eastern Orkneys. Orders were promptly
sent to Lowestoft, where the craft were fitted out and
manned by ratings of the Trawler Section, Royal Naval
Reserve. It was a sound scheme, and their presence
fulfilled a real need in the north, for only the day previous
the battle-cruiser NEW ZEALAND had sighted another sub-
marine in the North Sea, with her deck almost awash.
Within ten days the first six ships of this Northern Trawler
Flotilla were on their way to Scapa.
This, then, was an entirely new r61e for the trawlers to
play, and one that had not been contemplated prior to the
war. It meant that actually they were to perform the
duties of destroyers. Inferior to the latter as regards
speed, they possessed much superior sea-keeping ability ;
and their hardy crews, accustomed to North Sea weather
and possessing an excellent fighting spirit, now found their
vessels transformed into lightly-armed men-of-war. The
decision to employ fishing-vessels to hunt submarines was
justified by subsequent events. Within a week the Ad-
miralty were considering the advisability of employing even
steam-yachts as patrol craft, and Admiral Sir John Jellicoe
favoured the suggestion. It was most important that as
many small craft as possible should be taken up and used
as mine-sweepers or as submarine-chasers. Before the end
of August the Commander-in-Chief informed the Admiralty
that trawlers were much required off the Orkneys, as the
danger of mine-laying in that area was increasing. He
wanted twenty more at once. All that the Admiralty
could inform Sir John Jellicoe was that they were arming
trawlers for patrol duties as quickly as possible ; and
meantime Lowestoft was working at high pressure and
doing the best to meet the heavy demands.
Thus for two purposes the Royal Navy was hastily taking
up trawlers, first for mine-sweeping, secondly for harrying
submarines and mine-layers. But before the first month
of hostilities had come to an end, it was clear enough that
this was to be, in the main, a war of small craft. The
Admiralty therefore determined at the beginning of Sep-
tember to utilise all available steam-yachts, trawlers, and
motor-boats, and to form these into units ; each unit
was to consist of one yacht, four trawlers, and four motor-
CH. vm] STEAM- YACHTS TAKEN UP 325
boats, which were to be sent where they were required.
The first places would be Scapa, Loch Ewe, Rosyth,
Humber, and Cromarty. As more vessels became avail-
able, additional units were to be formed. The yachts'
and trawlers' armament would be either 3-pounders or
6-pounders, the yachts having two guns and the trawlers
one.
Forthwith the Admiralty began to take up all the steam-
yachts fit for service, and to send them to Portsmouth
and Devonport, to have their gun-mountings placed for-
ward and aft. Many of these yachts had but recently
finished their summer cruising, and as soon as their guns
were in position, their hulls painted grey, and their wireless
gear installed, they were dispatched to the North Sea.
Prior to this decision, two yachts had already been taken up
for other services. The s.y. Venetia had been commis-
sioned at the commencement of hostilities and sent to
Scapa Flow, where, under the command of Lieutenant-
Commander A. T. Wilson, R.N., she was looking after
the Northern Trawler Flotilla. The s.y. Zarefah, com-
manded by Lieutenant-Commander Stuart Garnett, and
officered and manned almost entirely by Cambridge rowing
men and Ratcliffe sea scouts, was at work in the North
Sea in connection with the swept channel.
These additional yachts which were now to be taken up
were to work inshore, thus enabling the destroyer patrol
flotillas to go farther out to sea, and they were to capture
any vessel, of whatever nationality, suspected of laying
mines. At this time the amount of traffic, both merchant
ships and fishing craft, using the North Sea was consider-
able. The destroyers and torpedo-boats were doing their
best, but they could not board and examine more than a
small percentage of suspicious ships. At first these yachts
were lent by their owners free of charge, the Admiralty
paying all expenses of equipment and running. At the
end of three months, provided the yachts were found
suitable for service, they were chartered at an agreed rate
per ton per month. Owners who possessed the necessary
qualifications were invited to take command and accept
commissions as lieutenants of the Royal Naval Volunteer
Reserve, though subsequently they were transferred to the
Royal Naval Reserve.
As to the motor-boats, there was already an organisation.
826 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
in existence. Its origin dated back a year or two before
the European crisis developed, and a working scheme was
just being completed when hostilities began. For a long
time past yachtsmen in England and Scotland had been
anxious to place their sea experience at the disposal of
the Royal Navy in the event of war. The difficulty was
to ^discover a way in which their enthusiasm and ability
could be utilised. Most of these yachtsmen were experts
in the art of handling sailing craft, but the age of sail
in the Royal Navy had long since passed. A suggestion,
however, came from the principal motor-yacht clubs that
in the event of war the Navy might find it useful to have a
number of motor craft at their disposal, officered by yachts-
men, and that these craft might prove of service in various
capacities round our coasts. Already there were in exis-
tence roughly three types. First was the cruiser type of
motor-yacht, able to keep the sea in moderate weather
and capable of being armed so as to act as a scout against
submarines. Secondly there was the small type of craft,
about the size of a picket-boat, which would be useful for
patrolling harbour mouths and estuaries. Finally came the
small motor-boat which could be used in a dozen ways for
policing harbours, taking despatches to shipping in the
roads, and in other miscellaneous duties.
The Admiralty were approached on the matter, and were
so far interested that they formed a Motor-Boat Reserve
Committee, under the presidency of Admiral Sir Frederick
S. Inglefield, which was instructed to report on the motor-
boats in the United Kingdom, and for what services in war
they could be utilised. This was in November 1912, and
in the following March, Admiral Inglefield reported that
the boats would be capable of patrolling and performing
examination service in estuaries and harbours ; assisting
in controlling traffic, berthing and detaining merchant
shipping in ports ; detecting hostile submarines that might
endeavour to enter a harbour ; acting as dispatch-boats
to ships in roadsteads ; attending on aircraft ; and,
finally, augmenting the present torpedo flotillas. This
corps, it was suggested, should consist of commanding
officers of divisions, with the rank of Commander ; owners
of boats with the rank of lieutenant ; and their assistants
with the rank of sub-lieutenant. The whole organisation
was to be a volunteer reserve. As a result of the first
CH. vin] THE MOTOR-BOAT RESERVE 327
report the Admiralty were so favourably impressed that in
January 1914 they proposed that the Motor-Boat Reserve
should be affiliated to the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve,
and they requested the Committee to send a further
report.
In the meantime, Admiral de Robeck, who was about
to relinquish his appointment as Admiral of Patrols, made
a number of suggestions and worked out a scheme of
organisation and of training for both officers and men in
the Motor-Boat Reserve. This was to include small-arm
drill, 3-pounder and machine-gun drill, signalling, tor-
pedoes, detection of submarines, wireless telegraphy,
visits to war-stations, lectures on International Law, and
so on. It was realised that a highly educated and intelli-
gent personnel would be available, and that a few would go
through a longer course equivalent to the short course
undertaken by naval officers. Admiral de Robeck further
showed his interest by attending a Motor-Boat Reserve
Committee in March 1914, when the various suggestions
which had been put forward were considered. The result
was so encouraging that just before the end of July the
Admiralty appointed a small Committee to draw up a
detailed scheme for the training and organisation of the
Motor-Boat Section of the Royal Naval Volunteer Re-
serve. It was to be under the chairmanship of Commodore
George Ballard, the new Admiral of Patrols, and included
officers of the three leading British Motor- Yacht Clubs.
That stage of affairs had been reached when suddenly
the country was plunged into the European War. The
scheme for training had to be dropped, and there were
other duties to occupy the attention of the Admiral of
Patrols. Still, it was fortunate that the organisation had
been developed so far, for the time had arrived to act ;
and, unless this preliminary spade-work had been done
quietly and thoughtfully in peace, it would have been
impossible to produce at once so useful an organisation.
Motor-boats were forthwith lent by their owners, and
during the first few days of the war the little craft were
employed principally in acting as despatch-boats in con-
nection with the transports that were carrying the British
Army from Southampton across to France. But towards
the end of September 1914, the first eight armed auxiliary
patrol units had been established at Loch Ewe, Dover, the
328 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
Humber, the Tyne, the Shetlands, and at Cromarty. The
biggest and best sea-going motor-yachts were selected and
sent to these stations. The officers had been given com-
missions in the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, the ratings
being known as motor-boatmen.
Arrived at their bases, these motor craft patrolled
the harbours, estuaries, and coasts in conjunction with
the steam-yachts and trawlers. There was work enough
for every sort and description of vessel, for the enemy was
engaged in extensive operations with both submarines
and mine-layers. Before the end of August already three
known German mine-fields had been laid. There was the
Southwold mine-field, of which the first mines had been laid
by the KONIGIN LUISE ; then the Tyne mine-field ; and,
lastly, the mine-fields off Flamborough and the Humber.
It is true that a swept and buoyed channel existed at the
beginning of September from the Goodwins as far north
as Flamborough, and was being patrolled. But outside
this narrow lane, four cables wide, the risks to shipping
were considerable. On September 3rd the patrol drifter
Linsdell had struck a mine near the Outer Dowsing (that
is, to the eastward of the Humber) and sunk ; fifteen
minutes later the gunboat SPEEDY also struck a mine,
with fatal results. Reports were received that this Humber
mine area was an extensive one, the mines being within
three feet of the surface. Similarly, from Newcastle
came the significant news that four vessels, apparently
drifters, had been seen forty-four miles east-south-east of
the Tyne, and three more thirty-five miles off. This was
on September 7th ; and inasmuch as there are no herrings
in that part of the North Sea at that season, the local
fishermen drew their own conclusions. British fishing
skippers recognised them as vessels which three months
before were German, and were fishing in the North Sea.
Now, in the track of merchant shipping, they were
laying mines.
Four days after the loss of the SPEEDY and Linsdell, the
fishing- vessel Revigo foundered on this Humber mine-field,
and the s.s. Runo had just been sunk on the Tyne mine-field,
a disaster that was followed next day by the loss of the
fishing-vessel Imperialist in the same manner forty miles
east-north-east of the Tyne. Admiral Jellicoe pointed out
that the difficulty of keeping the North Sea clear of mines
CH. vin] THE FIRST U-BOAT SUCCESSES 329
was rendered more difficult because of the impossibility
of boarding and examining the East Coast shipping. His
opinion was that mine-laying would never be stopped until
the East Coast traffic was diminished.
The work of the armed units of the Auxiliary Patrol
became now more strenuous than ever. Up to this time
the submarine had been a menace — a most serious
menace — but nothing more. But on September 5th the
first submarine success by the enemy was achieved when
H.M.S. PATHFINDER was torpedoed ten miles south-east of
May Island, off the entrance to the Firth of Forth. At
first it was believed that the loss had been caused by
a mine, but the mine-sweeping trawlers sent out by
Admiral Lowry from the Forth swept from Inchkeith
to May Island, then on to Bell Rock and all round the
position where the PATHFINDER had struck, and not a single
mine was found. It was evident that a submarine had been
lying in wait off the Forth in the hope of catching a warship
bound to or from Rosyth, and it was afterwards established
that a torpedo from U21 sank the PATHFINDER. Only a few
days later, a fishing- vessel called the Defender unmistakably
sighted a submarine eleven miles east by south of the Isle
of May, in practically the same spot where the PATHFINDER
had sunk ; and, true to her name, this trawler determined to
protect the Navy as far as she could. Leaving her fishing,
she at once hurried westward, gave the information to
Torpedo-Boat 32, and went up to the Forth to report the
fact also to H.M.S. RINGDOVE. She thus lost her day's
catch, but she had done the right thing, and the Admiralty
awarded her the sum of £62 for having so promptly given
valuable intelligence.
Three days later another submarine — or perhaps the same
one — fired a couple of torpedoes at the destroyer CHEERFUL
three miles west of Fidra, in the Firth of Forth ; the
destroyer STAG had also reported that torpedoes had been
aimed at her a few hours before off the Isle of May. But
nothing brought home the submarine peril more acutely
than the loss of the three big cruisers HOGUE, ABOUKIR,
and CRESS Y, which were sunk in the southern portion of
the North Sea by U9 on September 22nd. This triple
disaster showed to what dangers British ships were exposed.
More than ever the demand was for small armed craft.
On the Humber a special anti-submarine trawler flotilla
330 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
was being got ready. From Grimsby, too, four more
trawlers, specially fitted with a modified explosive sweep,
were sent to the Forth to act as submarine-hunters. These
were additional to the armed patrol. Rear-Admiral
George Ballard,1 the Admiral of Patrols, was ordered to
have the entrance to the Humber patrolled by trawlers
with their modified sweep in addition to his armed trawlers ;
and finally, with a view to checking mine-laying and the
dissemination of information useful to the enemy, the Ad-
miralty announced on September 27th that all East Coast
ports would be closed to neutral fishing craft from Octo-
ber 1st. This was a sharp measure, but it was absolutely
necessary if success was to attend the plans for dealing with
mine-layers and potential supply-ships acting as tenders
to German submarines.
When Sir John Jellicoe informed the Admiralty that
his destroyers were all too few for stopping and examining
traffic, he advocated the employment of armed trawlers,
fitted with wireless, in certain areas. He expressed his
belief in the freest possible use of these vessels. Some, he
urged, should be armed, but as their stems were a good
weapon for ramming, it was not necessary to arm all, and
there were not at the time sufficient guns to go round.
The Germans, he remarked, were making the greatest use
of trawlers, and we should do the same. Much the same
opinion came from Admiral Lowry at Rosyth, in whose
area the submarine activity in the Firth of Forth still
continued. On September 29th one submarine had been
seen as far up the Forth as Burntisland, and, owing to this
and other incidents, he had been compelled to suspend
in that neighbourhood all mine-sweeping operations.
Altogether no fewer than nine torpedoes had within a
few days been fired at British torpedo craft in the Forth,
and in view of the value of such vessels and their numerous
crews, he considered it was advisable to replace them by
armed trawlers or drifters as far as possible. Nor was the
menace confined to the North Sea ; for on September 27th,
H.M.S. ATTENTIVE had been attacked by two submarines
in the Straits of Dover.
Mines were being reported frequently in the North Sea,
and steamers were still foundering on them. But by this
date the whole organisation for dealing with mines, mine-
i Now Vice-Admiral George Ballard, C.B.
CH. vm] THE MINE-SWEEPING SERVICE 331
layers, and submarines was well in hand. So important
had the mine-sweeping service become that it had been
decided to appoint a flag officer in charge, and Rear-
Admiral E. F. B. Charlton, C.B.,1 was selected, with the
title " A.M.S." (Admiral of the East Coast Mine-sweepers).
This was in the middle of September.
Under this scheme the Mine-sweeping Service was to
consist of gunboats, drifters, trawlers, and other vessels
employed in mine-sweeping ; the sphere of operations
extending from St. Abb's Head to the South Goodwins,
exclusive of the Nore and Harwich areas. Under Admiral
Charlton were the Port Mine- sweeping Officers at Lowes-
toft, Eyemouth, Grimsby, and North Shields, the In-
specting Captain of Mine- sweepers continuing his duties
in connection with the chartering of trawlers as before.
This concentration of the whole of the mine-sweeping
on the East Coast under one senior officer was essential,
owing to the very large increase in mine- sweeping trawlers
and other vessels. It was a service quite distinct from
the armed patrol trawlers, yachts, and motor craft. It
did, however, include the drifters and armed trawlers
which were engaged in watching the swept channels.
During this first autumn no seamen more thoroughly
earned the gratitude of their nation than those of the busy
mine-sweepers, whose work was never finished. From each
East Coast port, day after day, six of them steamed out in
line ahead just before dawn to their stations ; and then
they would get sweeps out and go rolling down the North
Sea until relieved a few days later by another six ; all the
time they offered an easy target for the enemy's submarines,
and were equally liable to be blown up on an unseen mine.
From the North Foreland to Flamborough Head they
were now hard at work, keeping a clean highway a couple
of hundred miles long and eight hundred yards wide.
Every day this long road was swept twice. In the extreme
north, three pairs of trawlers were sweeping two channels
at each end of the boisterous Pentland Firth twice daily,
necessitating an actual steaming distance of eighty-five
miles for each trawler during the daylight hours of a short
autumn day. The Cromarty and Peterhead trawlers
were sweeping round the headlands of their own area, lest
the enemy should have laid his snares ; and all down the
1 Now Vice-Admiral Sir Edward F. B. Charlton, K.C.M.G., C.B.
332 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
coast — from the Forth, the Tyne, the Humber, Lowestoft,
Harwich, the Nore, Dover, Portsmouth, Portland, and
Devonport — they issued forth on their monotonous and
dangerous routine.
The sea was witnessing some strange sights. Scarcely
had the excursion paddle-steamers which used to ply
from so many piers been laid up, little expecting to be
brought into use until the return of peace, than they were
placed under the White Ensign. What earthly good did
the Navy expect to find in a Bank Holiday paddler ?
When the first of these ships came churning up the muddy
waters of the Humber and bumped into Grimsby Docks
alongside the steel trawlers, every seaman rubbed his eyes
and wondered. And yet those craft, drawing only about
seven and a half feet, did splendid work as mine-sweepers.
They could go into a mine-field with half the risk of the
deep-draught trawler, and they could steam at good
speed. The result was that two or three pairs soon
cleared up any suspected area and set merchant ships
free to proceed to their destinations. The first of these
paddle sweepers to be taken up were the Brighton Queen
and Devonia. They were sent round from Bristol to
Devonport, where they were fitted out, and thence they
steamed up the Channel and North Sea, encountering
very heavy weather on the way. In this manner still
another type of small craft was pressed into the Service.
Built for the purpose of giving pleasure, they were now
engaged in war. Some of them ended their days on mines,
but not before they had been the means of thwarting
certain of the enemy's best-laid schemes.
By the end of September good progress had been made
in adding to the number of auxiliary craft. Already fifteen
armed yachts were in commission, and about another
fifteen were being fitted out. There were roughly 300
trawlers and drifters and 100 motor craft at work, but
all the while the enemy was increasing his activities.
It was impossible to estimate exactly the intensity of the
submarine warfare, owing to the fact that the submarines
were mostly invisible. The only absolute evidence of
their activities was found in the number of ships sunk,
the number of times such craft were sighted, or in the
number of torpedoes whose wake might momentarily be
seen. It was equally impossible to say whether in a
CH. vm] SUBMARINES ACTIVITIES 333
given area, at a given time, these attacks were the work
of one or more submarines.
But the next month brought ample indication that
Germany was embarking whole-heartedly on a submarine
campaign of great dimensions, and scarcely a day went by
without supplying evidence. On the 2nd, 5th, 6th, 7th,
9th, llth, 12th, 13th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 21st, and 24th of
October, His Majesty's ships either sighted or were
attacked by enemy under-water craft. In this one month
alone enemy submarines made attempts on such varied
types of British warships as cruisers, destroyers, a gun-
boat, a monitor, a torpedo-boat, and a submarine, apart
from the refugee ship Amiral Ganteaume and s.s. Glitra,
mentioned in a previous chapter. Nor was this danger
in one area only, for in the Dover Straits the British sub-
marine B3 was attacked on October 2nd. During the next
few days in the same locality the destroyers COQUETTE
and MOHAWK chased submarines ; several drifters sighted
a submarine off the Smith's Knoll Buoy — that is, off
Great Yarmouth ; and a submarine was seen in Loch Ewe.
On the 9th, the cruiser ANTRIM was attacked off
Skudesnaes, and the next day the destroyer ATTACK off
the Schouwen Bank had a similar experience. A few
hours later a British torpedo-boat chased a submarine
off the Isle of Wight, the monitor SEVERN was attacked
in the Straits of Dover, and the destroyer GOSHAWK was
molested off the Dutch coast. On the 15th the cruiser
HAWKE was sunk in the North Sea, and the THESEUS,
another cruiser, was molested, both vessels belonging to
the Tenth Cruiser Squadron; and the destroyer leader
SWIFT was actually attacked three times whilst engaged
in picking up the HAWKE'S survivors. Next day the
destroyer ALARM just missed being hit by a torpedo, and
the destroyer NYMPHE, off the Orkneys, possibly struck
a submarine. On the 17th the mine-sweeping gunboat
LEDA, and again the SWIFT, had torpedoes fired at them
whilst entering Scapa Flow, and on the 21st the destroyer
LYNX saw a submarine off Cromarty Firth. Three days
later the destroyer BADGER was fired at. The torpedo
missed her, and the destroyer managed to ram the sub-
marine. Although the BADGER'S bows were damaged, the
enemy claimed that the submarine got home safely, and this
seems probable. The same day submarines were seen off the
334 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
west coast of Scotland in the neighbourhood of Loch Ewe
and Loch Shell. Finally, on the 31st the seaplane-carrier
HERMES was torpedoed and sunk not far from Dunkirk.
Such, then, was the enemy with whom the British Navy
had to contend. He showed respect neither for a refugee
ship nor for a merchant ship. What were the steps taken
to meet this violence ? All that could be done, besides
laying a British mine-field across the Straits of Dover
at the beginning of the month and extinguishing all lights
on the East Coast at the end of the month, from Orfordness
to Wick, was to strengthen the armed auxiliary patrol
in every way possible — in numbers, in organisation, and
in offensive devices. More and more guns were wanted for
these craft, but, unfortunately, they were not available.
The Royal Navy had never counted on so many demands
being made upon it, and the Army in France called for
every gun that could be turned out. But as an anti-
submarine device, the Admiralty attached great importance
to the explosive sweep. These sweeps were being made
in large numbers, and fitted to patrol trawlers. At Ports-
mouth alone fifty trawlers were thus being fitted, two
dozen more were prepared at Lowestoft, and Commander
L. A. B. Donaldson, R.N., was specially appointed to
the Admiralty to look after this device, his title being
" Commander Superintendent of Modified Sweeping."
Similarly, an improvement was made in jurisdiction,
the Dover and the East Coast being divided into two sepa-
rate commands. On October 12th Rear- Admiral the Hon.
H. L. A. Hood was appointed in command of the Dover
Patrol as Senior Naval Officer at Dover. In addition
to a destroyer flotilla and two submarine flotillas, he had
some trawlers and drifters placed in his command, and the
latter were presently to increase to considerable numbers.
Rear-Admiral George Ballard, the Admiral of Patrols,
now became responsible for the area extending from the
Naze to St. Abb's Head, an area in which were working
many trawlers fitted with explosive sweeps.
Admiral Jellicoe continued to ask for more trawlers for
Scapa Flow, Pentland Firth, Loch Ewe, and Moray
Firth. Submarines were still reported off the Grand
Fleet's northern base and in the Minch. Destroyers, he
said, were unsuitable for searching out the lochs and creeks,
and only got badly knocked about ; he also wanted trawlers
CH. vni] A NEW NAVY FORMING 335
for examining neutral ships in the"Minch and vicinity of
Pentland Firth, as the submarines prevented such work
being done by cruisers. Small flotillas of trawlers working
under a yacht were required, and so, on October 23rd, a
yacht and the trawlers were sent to him.
Three trawlers specially fitted with the explosive sweep
were also sent to the Straits of Dover under Lieutenant-
Commander George E. Tillard, R.N., to hunt submarines.
More motor-boats were being fitted out and sent to
the East Coast to examine the estuaries, harbours,
and inlets, but the demand still exceeded the supply.
Seven were working at Scapa Flow in connection with the
local defences, and the Rear-Admiral at Cromarty was
asking for eight to perform the duties of the Auxiliary
Patrol. Before the end of the month, the Admiralty were
able to inform Sir John Jellicoe that they were increasing
the number of armed trawlers at Cromarty, Peterhead,
Methil (Firth of Forth), Scapa, Rosyth, Loch Ewe, Great
Yarmouth, and Dover. The geographical position of
these places is a sufficient indication of their strategical
value in regard to submarines. As more trawlers became
available, they were armed with one or more guns and an
explosive sweep, and organised into divisions of six
trawlers to the unit. From each unit one trawler was to
be selected as divisional leader. She was to be fitted
up with a suitable officer's cabin, then placed under the
command of a lieutenant or sub-lieutenant of the Royal
Naval Reserve, and to be given also wireless telegraphy.
In addition, an armed yacht was to be attached to each
unit, and at certain important bases captains-in-charge
were to be appointed.
Granton, on the Forth, was becoming an important
war base for trawlers and yachts, and was destined soon
to be one of the largest auxiliary stations on the coast.
Sixty additional trawlers were now taken up as armed
patrol vessels. There were a hundred of these already
in the Service or being fitted out, and the full 160 were
being organised into twenty-six divisions of six vessels
each, and one of four vessels. These, of course, were quite
apart from the mine-sweeping trawlers and the watching
drifters. In fact, before October was ended — that is to
say, within less than three months of the declaration
of war — there were 130 armed trawlers either in commission
23
336 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
or nearly ready ; and thirty-seven armed yachts either
patrolling or fitting out, in addition to 246 mine-sweeping
trawlers, two paddle mine-sweepers, and forty-two drifters.
With admirable zeal and energy a new navy had been
created in a few weeks which already exceeded in numbers
the navy that flew the White Ensign at the beginning of
August. In spite of the haste with which the ships and
men had been assembled and sent out to their strange
duties, in spite of the dangers from weather, fogs, sub-
marines, and mines, only half a dozen trawlers and drifters
had been lost during the period. The decision to use for
warlike purposes, under modern conditions, ships which
were never intended for the contest of organised violence,
and men without war training, had abundantly justified
itself, to the great advantage of the country and the
welfare of British shipping.
Warfare by means of the mine, and warfare by means
of the submarine, are practically identical. The aim in
each case is to sink the ship attacked by a violent explosive
without the victim having so much as a chance of escaping.
The only difference between the torpedo and the mine
is that the former goes to meet the ship, and the latter
waits for the ship's coming. The result in the two cases
is the same.
There were only two courses open to the Admiralty.
The first was to make mine-laying for the enemy as
difficult as possible, and the second was to continue in-
creasing the resources of mine-sweeping. These obvious
measures were carried out. To begin with, not only had
all the East Coast ports been closed to neutral fishing-
vessels from October 1st, but any neutral fishing- vessel
found fishing west of a certain line in the North Sea was
regarded as under suspicion of mine-laying. The British
Government were determined to take no half-measures,
and gave warning that any trawlers not in the exclusive
employment of the German Government found illicitly
laying mines would be sunk, while their crews would be
liable to be treated as war criminals and shot after trial
by court martial.
It will be recollected that when discussing the pre-war
arrangements the Admiralty had established the principle
that trawlers were suitable for sweeping fairways and
the entrances to harbours, but not for sweeping ahead
CH. vin] MINE-LAYING RAIDS 337
of the Fleet, owing to their comparatively slow speed.
Before the end of the autumn, after Commander Preston's
gunboats had been doing much service in the North,
Admiral Jellicoe asked for some Fleet sweepers. He in-
sisted that they should possess good speed and be sea-
worthy, and be capable of standing the heavy weather which
prevails off the north of Scotland. The Admiralty, there-
fore, took up four pairs of steamers owned by various rail-
way companies and fitted them out with the requisite gear.
These vessels were the Reindeer, the Roebuck, the Lynx,
and Gazelle, all owned by the Great Western Railway ;
the Folkestone and Hythe belonging to the South-Eastern
and Chatham Company, and the Clacton and Newmarket,
which were the property of the Great Eastern Company.
The first pair was taken in hand at the beginning of October.
The policy adopted by the Admiralty in regard to the
mine-fields was as follows : The trawlers were to sweep
the North Foreland to Flamborough Head channel clear
and safe ; the limits of all suspicious areas were to be
defined and therefore avoided ; the mine-fields, once their
extent and position had been discovered, were to be left
intact, and not swept up. Thus the three mine-fields off
the East Coast acted as a means of protection against the
enemy's possible aggression. Inasmuch as the safe channel
for shipping ran between the coast and the mine-field, it
was obvious that the enemy was doing us a good turn in
laying mines, when once the limitations of these areas
had been ascertained. For his measures to be effective,
he should have gone close inshore and fouled the swept
channel. But to lay mines inshore was not so easy as
it seemed, for there were only three possible methods.
The first was to employ small craft, especially fishing- vessels,
but this sort of thing had already been rendered too risky
a proceeding, owing to the careful watch maintained by
the British patrols. The second method was to lay the
mines invisibly, but the submarine mine-layer had still to
be commissioned. Lastly, there was always a possibility of
a strong raiding force coming across and overpowering the
British patrols, leaving German mine-layers free to do what
they liked. It was this third alternative which was adopted
by the enemy at the time of the Scarborough and Gorleston
raids, when, under the feint of bombarding the cbast,
dangerous mine areas were laid. These developments will
838 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
be considered separately in so far as they concern this
History, but for the moment attention must be devoted
to another locality.
Germany now developed on fresh lines her campaign
against ocean traffic. From the Dominion of Canada a
number of transports would soon be crossing the Atlantic
on their way to England, bringing troops to aid British
arms. If Germany could lay a mine-field in the path of
these vessels, and blow any of them up, that would be sound
strategy. It was on October 3rd that the first Canadian
convoy left Canadian waters, and on the very day that this
convoy began to arrive in Plymouth Sound an exception-
ally large mine-layer was leaving Germany. This auxiliary
vessel was the Norddeutscher Lloyd liner BERLIN, of
over 17,000 registered tonnage, and a speed of about
17 knots. In peace-time she had been well known on the
New York service, and the reasons for employing her in
mine-laying were twofold. If she were seen in the track
of Atlantic shipping she would not excite much suspicion,
for she looked what she was — an Atlantic liner. More-
over, she had ample capacity for carrying many hundreds
of mines, and a long after-deck from which to lay them.
She was, however, a little unfortunate at first, for she acted
on faulty information. She arrived too late to interfere
with the big convoy of thirty-one transports, and she
had erroneously assumed that the transports would come
to Liverpool via the North of Ireland.
She had already made one attempt to pass through the
North Sea at the end of September, when, having got
up towards the Norwegian coast, she sighted a number
of British men-of-war, and therefore put back to Germany.
On October 14th, however, she steamed away from Wil-
helmshaven with 2,000 mines on board, being escorted
by a couple of submarines. Passing round the north
and west of Scotland, she arrived off the North of Ireland
and laid a big mine-field off Tory Island on October 22nd
and 23rd. It happened that there steamed out of the
Manchester Ship Canal, on October 24th, a 5,000 ton
steamship called the Manchester Commerce, bound for the
River St. Lawrence, whence the Canadian convoy had
started, and on the afternoon of the 27th she struck one
of the mines off Tory Island and sank ; the explosion
occurred between Nos. 2 and 3 holds, the ship drawing
CH. vin] THE TORY ISLAND MINE-FIELD 339
at the time 19 feet 5 inches forward and 22 J feet aft.
Next day at 9 a.m., whilst the Second Battle Squadron
was steaming in this locality, the third ship in the
line, H.M.S. AUDACIOUS, struck a mine and eventually
foundered.
This event suggested more work for the trawlers in an
unexpected quarter. It happened that at this time
part of the Grand Fleet, with Admiral Jellicoe's flagship,
had anchored in Lough Swilly, and until this mine-field
was cleared the ships were practically blockaded — the very
thing, as has been explained already, that was feared would
happen when war broke out. Admiral Jellicoe the same
day telegraphed to the Admiralty asking for eight mine-
sweeping trawlers to be sent to Lough Swilly at once.
Nothing was then known about the Berlin having been
there ; the only information was that a mine-field was in
existence about eighteen to twenty miles N. ^ E. of Tory
Island. To what extent and in what direction it spread,
absolutely no information was available. In response to
the Commander-in-Chief's request, four mine-sweeping
trawlers were at once ordered to leave Milford Haven for
Lough Swilly. For an enemy wishing to mine the shipping
track to Liverpool and the Atlantic the obvious strategic
points are firstly that strip of sea called the North Channel
between the north-east coast of Ireland and the Mull of
Cantyre ; and, secondly, the St. George's Channel. As
it was suspected that the enemy might have fouled these
approaches, orders were sent the day after the disaster
to the AUDACIOUS that two groups of six trawlers, each
attended by an armed vessel, were to be dispatched from
Lowestoft to the westward. Of these two groups, one
was to proceed to Larne in order to sweep the North
Channel, the other was to go to Milford to sweep the St.
George's Channel. Nor was this all. The Admiralty
decided at once that energetic action was essential
in order to cope with this mine-laying on the West Coast
and on the trade approaches. Two additional squadrons
of about twenty trawlers each, with a proportion of mine-
sweepers, were to be formed without delay for the purpose
of searching and picketing these areas.
As this dramatic revelation of the Tory Island death-
trap suggested that other new mine-fields might be laid
off the anchorages used by the Grand Fleet, Sir John
340 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
Jellicoe, on October 28th, ordered the Vice-Admiral
commanding the Orkneys and Shetlands to send trawlers
to sweep for mines up to within thirty miles of the bases.
The same day, also, special instructions were sent to the
Senior Naval Officer at Liverpool to proceed with the
utmost dispatch with the organisation of a special
auxiliary patrol for the prevention of mine -lay ing. Thus
yet another type of merchant vessel came to be pressed
suddenly into the war. Who is there familiar with ships
and seafaring matters that has not heard of the wonderful
achievements of the famous Liverpool tugs, which can go
anywhere and do almost anything ? These powerful
little craft have made some wonderful voyages across the
world towing floating docks, disabled liners, or dismasted
sailing-ships. The war was certainly becoming far-reach-
ing when it needed these craft. However, two days after
the AUDACIOUS had foundered, a dozen of these Liverpool
tugs were commandeered, six of them to patrol the North
Channel, board suspicious ships and prevent mine-laying,
while the other six were to be sent to Milford to patrol the
southern part of the Irish Sea. This was only a temporary
measure until more trawlers could be chartered, and before
the end of the year the tugs were sent back to Liverpool.
Meanwhile, in addition to the tugs, the armed yacht
Oriana and a number of drifters were ordered to patrol
the vicinity of the Mull of Cantyre, and to search such
places as Loch Indail, the west coast of Islay, and its
northern side.
Within three days of the AUDACIOUS disaster, six mine-
sweeping trawlers were hard at work sweeping from
Lough Swilly entrance to the west and south of Tory
Island, but found no mines ; they had yet to learn that
the mines were farther to the northward, but their first
duty was to insure a safe channel close to the coast.
While the Grand Fleet was unable to leave its anchorage,
the entrance to Lough Swilly was being patrolled by the
armed yacht Lorna and six trawlers ; more drifters
were also taken up at Kingstown and sent to swell the
list of small craft. The experience of war had upset
many preconceived ideas, but it was a strange fact that,
while yachts, tugs, trawlers, and drifters could use the
sea, it was not safe for battleships and cruisers to venture
forth.
CH. vm] WEAKNESS OF THE WESTERN PATROL 341
An inquiry into the manner by which the BERLIN
managed to pass through the North Sea and down the
Atlantic right to the coast of Ireland, without being
intercepted by any of the vessels belonging to the Grand
Fleet, would yield interesting reading, but it is foreign
to the present purpose. It is, however, pertinent to ask
what our Auxiliary Patrol vessels in the neighbourhood
of Ireland were doing at the time the Berlin was acting
as she pleased. The answer is simple. This incident
happened within the first few weeks of the war, when every
available patrol craft had been sent to the North Sea,
for the obvious reason that that was the main theatre of
war. It had scarcely seemed credible then that the coast of
Ireland could have much strategical value, and the western
areas were almost bare in respect of patrols. At the time
when the Berlin paid her visit, the only auxiliary craft in
Ireland were : at Queenstown, an armed yacht, four
drifters, and two or three motor-boats ; and at Belfast, the
armed yacht Ilex and four armed trawlers. That was all.
There were two bigger craft patrolling to the westward
and eastward of the North of Ireland. The old-fashioned
light cruiser Isis was cruising about remarkably close to
where the mine-layer had been ; for the noon position of
the Isis on October 22nd was seventy miles west of Tory
Island, and at noon of the following day she was forty-
five miles west by north of Bloody Foreland. The Tar a,
another of the commissioned railway steamers, was also
patrolling the North Channel, and she proceeded to Larne
on the 21st to coal. To the north was the armed yacht
Hersilia, on her way from Peterhead to Loch Ewe, her
station ; on the 24th she sighted a submarine off Loch
Shell, and the same day a submarine had also been sighted
five miles north-east of lona Island. It is probable that
these were the two submarines which had accompanied the
Berlin.
There were, too, four armed trawlers and four motor-
boats based on Loch Ewe, but there were only the armed
yacht Oriana and four drifters working out from Liver-
pool. The auxiliary force, then, was inadequate for keep-
ing the trade approaches in this part of the British Isles
well patrolled and shipping watched for suspicious move-
ments. But the foundering of the Manchester Commerce
and AUDACIOUS had shown that it was impossible to
342 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
treat this area as almost negligible ; it needed plenty of
patrol craft and proper organisation. So Commander H.
Berkeley, R.N., was selected and sent to Larne to act
as Senior Naval Officer, and to organise for the North
Channel the patrol force now being dispatched. At
first he had only the Oriana and her four drifters and
six Liverpool tugs, until other vessels could be obtained.
While each drifter carried a 3-pounder gun, the tugs had
nothing beyond rifles for weapons, but they had been
provided with explosive signals and flares, so that, if a
mine-layer or other suspicious ship was sighted, they could
instantly warn the other patrols.
Meanwhile, the greatest activity was being manifested
to increase the patrols at the most important points.
Four more yachts and forty-eight additional trawlers
were ordered to Scapa from various ports within a week
of the Manchester Commerce's sinking, and the dockyards
were being asked how many trawlers they could fit out
for service. It was no easy problem for the Admiralty,
as already the resources of our fishing fleets had been
called upon to an extraordinary extent. More patrol
vessels, the Director of Operations pointed out, were
required for the West, but he confessed 'that it was diffi-
cult to see where they could be obtained. Considerable
progress was being made with the manufacture of the
modified sweep explosive charges for dealing with the
submarines. These sweeps were being prepared for
another seventy trawlers, and orders had been placed
for a still further supply of sixty ; but the manufacture
took time, and Woolwich could not turn out more than
a hundred a week.
The Admiralty needed nearly a couple of hundred more
trawlers, despite the large number of the little ships they
had already chartered. It was a strange experience
for these fishing craft suddenly to find themselves every-
where in so much demand. Off the North Irish coast
they were having a strenuous time sweeping for mines
in the heavy Atlantic swell ; it was certainly no yachting
trip, and presently a long series of gales interfered con-
siderably with their operations. Some of Commander
Preston's old mine-sweepers had been sent down from
Scapa to assist. The CIRCE and LEDA came first, and by
October 29th they had been joined at Lough Swilly by the
CH. vm] LOCATING THE MINE-FIELD 343
JASON, the SPEEDWELL, and the SKIPJACK, which swept
the channel along the shore to the east and west of the
entrance of Lough Swilly. Thus at length a safe passage
inshore of Tory Island and Inishtrahull could be guaran-
teed, and the Grand Fleet was freed to put to sea once
more.
On November 2nd six trawlers again endeavoured to find
where the BERLIN'S mine-field began and ended. They
made an exploratory sweep from Fanad Point, the western
headland of Lough Swilly, well out into the Atlantic, but
found nothing ; and then, having swept out as far north as
the fifty fathom line, they swept in three directions from
Tory Island, north-north-west, north, and north-north-
east, but still without result. Six drifters, which had been
sent with their nets to search for mines, had no better
fortune. In the last week of November another six mine-
sweeping'rMtrawlers under the command of Lieutenant Sir
James Domville, Bart., R.N., arrived. These craft had
come from Scapa Flow to locate the mine-field. It was
important that no time should be lost, but exceptionally
heavy weather set in, and it was not till late in December
that the trawlers could get to work again. A special sweep
was carried out from Skerryvore to the Mull of Cantyre,
a route likely to have been fouled because it was that
traversed by Grand Fleet ships bound for Liverpool for
docking Jor repairs. No mines were found. Then, on
December 19th, another disaster occurred, when the
Donaldson liner Tritonia foundered on a mine in almost
the same spot where the AUDACIOUS and Manchester Com-
merce had been sunk.
Fortunately during the next three days the trawlers
at last succeeded in finding the dangerous area, a task
that is far harder than may be realised by those unfamiliar
with such work. Search for mines in the Atlantic in
the winter, and never finding them until they suddenly
appear in the sweep or blow the trawler to destruction, is
an operation not to be undertaken either lightly or inad-
visedly. It needs determination to stick it out, enduring
the monotonous routine and boisterous weather ; but it
also needs pluck to go blindly where mines may be found,
and a special kind of intuition to guess where the enemy
may have laid them. Between December 20th and 22nd,
Sir James Domville's trawlers managed to sweep up and
344 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
explode no fewer than a dozen of the Berlin's mines.
Five of them were discovered sixteen miles north-east
by north of Tory Island, and three more eighteen miles
north-north-east of the same island. It was many weeks
before the whole mine-field was completely cleared up, but
a good beginning had been made, and the trawlers kept
doggedly at work. The danger was increased by the
heavy weather, which had caused many of the mines to drift
in roughly a north-easterly direction. On December 2nd
one was even found by the battleship NEPTUNE on the
direct line between Oronsay and Skerryvore, and was
sunk by her, but others drifted up the west coast of Scot-
land.
And whilst all this increased activity in regard to patrols
and mine-sweepers was proceeding in the North of Ireland,
a similar impetus had been created also in the south of
the Irish Sea. About the time when Commander Berkeley
was appointed to Larne, the Admiralty instituted another
base for auxiliary craft. This was at Milford, and
thither Captain K. C. Gibbons, R.N., was sent to take
charge of the patrol vessels working the St. George's
Channel and the outer part of the Bristol Channel.
Milford began [to [develop into a most important base,
and before very long its spacious haven was alive with
all sorts of auxiliary craft. As a beginning, twenty
armed trawlers, in addition to some mine-sweepers and
armed yachts, were ordered there, as well as six Liverpool
tugs. The armed yachts Aster and Greta, both small
enough for the work, and typical fine-weather pleasure
vessels, were based on Milford temporarily. But the
mine-sweeping trawlers had an equally important office
to perform as soon as they could get to sea. It was essen-
tial that they should ascertain whether the enemy had laid
a mine-field in the south of the Irish Sea, as he had in the
north. They were accordingly ordered to sweep the
Irish coast from the Tuskar and Coningbeg against the tide,
and then work across the St. George's Channel in about
six tides. This exploratory sweep was duly carried out,
but happily no mines had been laid there.
Reference has been made to the increasing difficulty
which the enemy was finding in laying mine-fields in the
North Sea, consequent on the improvement of the British
patrols. The line of demarcation which the Admiralty
CH. vin] SPIRIT OF THE FISHERMEN 345
had ruled down this sea suffered neutral fishing craft to
proceed no farther west than the Dogger Bank, unless they
wished to be treated as suspicious ships. The Dogger
Bank for hundreds of years has been one of the most
productive fishing areas in the world, and the British
fisherman continued to use it in war-time, even though he
went there knowing full well the risks he ran. Farther
down the coast, the Lowestoft and Yarmouth men went
on fishing pretty much as usual, and the Ramsgate
smacks also sailed up the coast, trawling as they went.
These men had nothing to gain by the war, and everything
to lose, for if the freedom of the seas were denied to them,
their means of livelihood disappeared and people ashore
would have no fish. As the demand for crews and ships
increased, the younger men joined the Trawler Section of
the Royal Naval Reserve, but the older men carried on
with that fine spirit which had always been the glory of
British seamanhood. Their co-operation with the British
Navy was admirable. They realised all that the war
by sea meant to them. Moreover, their spirit had been
roused by the way the enemy had laid his mines in the
areas which they, as peaceful fishermen, had always
frequented, and though these fishermen had little regard
for the niceties of international law and the subtleties
of regulations, they were determined to do their utmost
to hinder the enemy to the full extent of their ability.
At the beginning of November there existed in the
North Sea one British and three German mine-fields.
There was the Tyne area, the Flamborough Head to the
Spurn area, the Southwold area, and the area which in-
cluded the British mines laid across the Dover Straits.
But it had become evident towards the end of October
that the enemy was at work on some undefined fresh
attack. Three suspicious vessels had been seen to the
north of the area where the upper end of the Southwold
mine ended — that is to say, not far from Smith's Knoll, in
the vicinity of Yarmouth. A report came in that, when a
Ramsgate smack which was fishing in that neighbourhood
approached these suspicious ships, she was fired on. Very
shortly afterwards this smack, whilst sailing about, got
a couple of mines in her trawl, and one of the mines blew
up. The incident was a little mysterious at the .time,
but in the light of after-events it became intelligible.
346 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
A few miles off Yarmouth is the Smith's Knoll shoal,
which runs parallel with the shore. It was marked by
a lighted buoy at its southern end. From this buoy a
short channel had been kept swept, so that it formed a
safe highway for ships from the North Sea into the other
swept channel which ran from the North Foreland to
Flamborough. It was evident, from what subsequently
occurred, that the enemy had obtained information of this
secret channel, and he certainly was about to make use
of it in connection with the Gorleston raid. It is signi-
ficant of both the raid on Gorleston, and that which oc-
curred a few weeks later on the Yorkshire coast, that the
actual bombardment was of secondary importance, and
the laying of mines was the main object, for the enemy
realised that as soon as he opened fire on the shore the
British naval forces would be sent to attack the Germans.
In other words, it was an obvious invitation to battle,
but without any intention on the part of the enemy to
fight ; since before the two forces could engage, the Ger-
man squadron would have scattered plenty of mines
across the line of pursuit, thus imperilling valuable war-
ships whose loss we could not afford.
The scheme also included the laying of additional
mine-fields just before the raid took place, with the same
intention of entrapping His Majesty's ships. Thus the
enemy hoped to inflict on us losses from three separate
traps. He reasoned that, as soon as the news of his bom-
bardment was telegraphed up and down the country,
some of the Grand Fleet squadrons and flotillas would
come steaming down from the North across the Dogger
Bank ; local patrol- ships would emerge in haste from
Yarmouth ; and some of Commodore Tyrwhitt's destroyer
force would steam north from Harwich up the Suffolk
coast to the scene of the bombardment. For each of
these three forces a mine-field was to be laid, and there
is circumstantial evidence that this project was carried
out.
The suspicious ships seen by the Ramsgate trawler
had almost certainly been laying some of the mines. It
was the definite opinion of Admiral Charlton, in charge
of the East Coast mine-sweepers, that the mines, on which
later on the British submarine D5 foundered, had been laid
just prior to the raid, " with the intention of trapping
CH. vni] A SUSPICIOUS DRIFTER 347
any of our vessels leaving Yarmouth in pursuit." Be
that as it may, on November 2nd, the Smith's Knoll Light
Buoy was found to have mysteriously disappeared, and
that same afternoon a so-called "neutral" fishing- vessel
was reported in circumstances which were at least
suspicious. The spot was sixty-five miles north-east of
the Spurn, at the south-west corner of the Dogger Bank.
It was just inside the imaginary line drawn by the
Admiralty, so neutral fishing-vessels sighted were not
necessarily suspected as mine-layers.
About three o'clock the Hull steam trawler Alonso
was in that neighbourhood. She was not a patrol vessel,
but had come out there to fish, and as she was steaming,
her skipper, Mr. Charles Read, who was on the bridge,
noticed another vessel about four miles away to the south-
ward with her mainsail and mizzen set. She appeared
to be a foreign sailing drifter. It was a hazy afternoon
and there were no other vessels in sight, but when half
an hour later he got nearer he noticed that the strange ship
had steam as well as sail and that she had white bows.
She had lowered her mainsail and hoisted a flag on her
mizzen. Skipper Read, having been all his life familiar
with the ways of trawlers and drifters, decided in his
own mind that she was acting suspiciously. He there-
fore steamed up to her and found that she was riding to a
floating anchor. She had no nets out, nor were there any
buoys or pellets visible such as one would expect to find
on a drifter's deck. The Alonso passed right under her
stern, and her skipper noticed that the drifter had a derrick
swung out from her bridge with a tackle from the end of
the derrick to the mizzenmast head. This derrick,
which reached out from the ship's rail about eight feet,
was made either of iron or steel, and caused the vessel
to appear still more suspicious.
What was the obvious inference to be drawn from a
drifter with no nets, lying practically stationary, and with
a heavy derrick already swung out for use ? Appearances
suggested to Skipper Read that she was there for the
purpose of laying mines during the haze. For twenty-
five years he had been fishing, but he had never before
seen a drifter with a derrick; "Nor," he remarked, "is
a derrick used by drifters in their fishing." He expressed
his suspicions to his crew, and suggested that the best
348 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
thing to do would be to run her down. The evidence,
however, was insufficient to warrant his taking such a
drastic step, so, to quote his own words, " As I could not
see any mines I decided not to do this, but to break my
voyage by ceasing fishing operations and make for the
Humber as quickly as possible, to give the information
to one of the Admiralty vessels." He steamed back to
the Spurn and came up the Humber, where H.M.S. VIC-
TORIOUS was lying as guardship, and gave her the informa-
tion. He had done the right thing, had patriotically
sacrificed his fishing, and wasted no time. The Admiralty
showed their appreciation of his devotion to duty by
making a present of £25 to the skipper and crew, in
addition to another £25 to the owners.
The next morning the Gorleston raid occurred.1 Briefly,
the facts are as follows : Just after seven o'clock in the
morning of November 3rd, H.M.S. HALCYON, which had
just left Yarmouth to look for mines, sighted a four-
funnelled cruiser steering south- south- west towards the
shore, and two minutes later there appeared four German
Dreadnought vessels as well. This was an enemy squadron,
which is supposed to have left Heligoland Bight the pre-
vious evening. Within a quarter of an hour of being
sighted the enemy opened fire, and it was seen that there
were two cruisers following astern of the Dreadnoughts.
About the same time two British destroyers, the LIVELY
and LEOPARD, also came under fire, but the former made
a smoke-screen to windward of HALCYON and thus shielded
her. At twenty minutes to eight, by which time the
HALCYON'S steering compass had been shot away, but
practically no other damage done, the enemy ceased fire,
and was seen to be steering to the south-eastward. Shortly
afterwards the squadron was lost sight of. The enemy had
come down from Smith's Knoll, and having proceeded
thence towards the shore, had begun to lay mines from the
rearmost ship just before altering course to the south-east.
The LEOPARD endeavoured to keep in touch with the
enemy, but he was soon lost to sight. Presently the
submarine D5 came out from Yarmouth in pursuit, but
she had only covered a couple of miles south-east of the
South Cross Sand when she struck a mine and was lost.
1 Fuller and later information supported the conclusion that all the
mines discovered after the Gorleston raid were laid by enemy men-of-war.
CH. vra] SWEEPING UP THE NEW MINES 349
As to the raiding squadron, they had apparently
dropped mines as they approached Smith's Knoll,
then all the way down the swept Smith's Knoll passage,
for six or seven miles towards the Cross Sand Lightship ;
and, having altered course, they continued to lay mines
as they proceeded seawards. They had thus laid a veri-
table trap, but again a fisherman, by his intelligence,
rendered excellent service and saved valuable lives and
ships. About 3.30 in the afternoon a fishing-vessel re-
turned to Lowestoft, and her skipper reported that the
enemy had laid these mines. He had seen the Germans
engaged in the very act, and had observed that one of
the ships had her quarter-deck covered with mines ready
to be dropped overboard.
The object of the enemy became clear. He had fouled
the Smith's Knoll passage, and had scattered mines in the
track of any pursuers. The actual shore bombardment had
been little more than a blind. For our part, the first duty
was to save British ships, and the Columbia was forthwith
recalled to Lowestoft, bringing with her all the mine-
sweepers available, and ordered to keep well to the north-
ward of the Smith's Knoll buoy. Unfortunately, three
fishing-vessels the same day foundered on this new mine-
field ; but the next day the mine-sweeping trawlers went
out on their dangerous job, groping about to find where
the mines had been strewn. To add to their dangers
a fog settled down, and on the following day, November 5th,
the Mary, one of the mine-sweeping trawlers, struck a
mine whilst at work and sank. This put an end tempor-
arily to the sweeping operations, but before long the passage
was cleared and a new channel was in existence. Once
again the best-laid scheme of a ruthless enemy had been
brought to naught by the good work oi* the trawlers,
though at the expense of valuable lives. Not a single
merchant ship or big man-of-war had fallen into the
trap, though, unhappily, a submarine, besides several
fishing craft, had been lost.
So much for the mine-laying efforts of the enemy.
During the first week of November the Admiralty became
aware that he was increasing his submarine attacks.
Almost simultaneously twenty armed trawlers reached
Scapa Flow for local defence, but still the Commander-
in-Chief required more. Eighteen he was using to work
350 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
in the Minch and between Cape Wrath and Pentland
Firth, those wild, boisterous waters where seaworthy,
well-built craft are thoroughly tried. The Shetlands
Patrol had been further strengthened by six trawlers,
but another dozen trawlers were required for the Moray
Firth, to provide for the safety of the battle cruisers.
Nor was this all. The Admiralty began to take up a
number of stoutly-built Scotch motor fishing-boats for
patrol work. They are wonderful sea-boats, double ended,
though rather slow. Sixteen of them were soon put into
service by the Motor-Boat Reserve, each manned by a
crew of five hardy Scotch fishermen, with two officers
of the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve. These boats
were about sixty feet long, and were sent to Lerwick,
Scapa, Cromarty, and the Firth of Forth, but presently
there were also to be based on Cromarty three armed
yachts with wireless, and eighteen trawlers fitted with
the explosive sweep, in addition to ten motor-boats for
patrolling narrow waters. Granton, too, now became
a very important naval base for trawlers, under Captain
Cecil Fox ; and having regard to the extent to which
submarines had frequented the vicinity of the Firth of
Forth, its development was undertaken none too soon.
Within eight weeks eighteen enemy submarines had been
sighted inside the limits of Rosyth Naval Centre, apart
from those which had been seen up the Forth itself. At
least six submarines had been identified near the Long-
stone, and it seemed probable that they were using this
spot for making the land. Though the Longstone light
had been extinguished in the first week of September,
submarines continued to be sighted off there during the
next two months.
Before attention is devoted to the North, something
must be said of what was happening in the English Channel.
It was expected that submarines were about to operate
off the South Coast, and with the limited available auxiliary
patrols efforts were made to cope with this activity.
The task was most difficult. Prior to the war there had
been a disposition to underrate the capacity of the sub-
marine, and when its offensive ability was demonstrate
only too forcibly, it was painfully realised that our countei
measures were by no means adequate. The Grand Fle<
had to be preserved intact, at all costs, on the principl
CH. vin] INCREASED NEED FOR AUXILIARIES 351
that the final contest is decided by the capital ship. Con-
sequently, nearly all the destroyers, and a great part of
the armed auxiliary patrols, were attracted to northern
latitudes. Small ships on the South Coast were few in
numbers, and the problem to be solved was rendered no
easier by the fact that the enemy had developed a type
of mine-laying submarine which could do its work without
breaking the surface.
Portsmouth was asking for eight drifters to patrol
outside the Solent ; Portland required trawler patrols
for the Dorset coast ; and we were compelled to invite
the French to organise a trawler patrol in order to pursue
submarines by day and night in the area between the lines
Dungeness-Boulogne and Beachy Head-Dieppe. The sub-
marine came and went like a will-o'-the-wisp. On
November 6th three torpedoes were fired at H.M.
Torpedo-boat 91 while patrolling off the Girdler in the
Thames Estuary ; the same day H.M.S. DRAKE sighted a
periscope off Hoy Sound at the western entrance to Scapa
Flow. Five days later H.M.S. NIGER, an old-fashioned
gunboat, was torpedoed close to Deal Pier. On the 18th
H.M.S. SKIPJACK chased a submarine north of the Orkneys.
Submarines continued to be reported off the Hebrides and
Cape Wrath. H.M.S. AJAX also sighted a periscope about
midway between the Faroe Islands and Cape Wrath.
These incidents in no wise lessened the demand for
auxiliary craft. Yet again the Commander-in-Chief asked
for more and more trawlers — twelve to be based on Storn-
oway for patrolling the east coast of the Hebrides and the
west coast of Skye and Mull ; six to be based on West Loch
Tarbert for the west coast of the Hebrides ; and twelve to
be at Loch Ewe for the outer coast of Scotland. He also
desired one yacht for the west coast of the Hebrides, one at
Stornoway, and one at Loch Ewe. But already the Ad-
miralty was working out a bold and comprehensive scheme
for dealing with the whole coast-line, and meanwhile every-
thing possible was done by improvisation to strengthen
our defensive measures against the mine and submarine.
Instructions were issued to accelerate the fitting out of
trawlers with modified explosive sweeps. Admiral Sir
Percy Scott, who, just prior to the war, had suggested in
the face of some criticism the great possibilities of the sub-
marine, was in the middle of November appointed to the
24
352 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vni
Admiralty to investigate the best methods for counter-
acting this invisible vessel. As a further step, the Ad-
miralty elaborated a scheme for modifying the lighting
and buoyage from Great Yarmouth to the Isle of Wight,
and this came into force early in December.
Meanwhile the task of the mine-sweeping trawlers grew
no lighter. For, besides keeping clear that long lane from
the North Foreland to Flamborough Head, they had to
meet many demands made upon them. Towards the
end of November Rear- Admiral Stuart Nicholson had been
directed to bombard Zeebrugge with the battleships
RUSSELL and EXMOUTH. To sweep ahead of his ships
he required eight trawlers, and so, at a time when they
could ill be spared, four had to be sent from Lowestoft
and another four from Great Yarmouth. They proceeded
to Dover and thence to Dunkirk, sweeping a clear way for
the battleships, but such craft were hardly suited for this
kind of work, as they were wanting in speed. Presently
trawlers were sent from Dunkirk to sweep the West Deep,
off Nieuport, clear of floating mines, work which they could
perform admirably. But the strain put upon the East
Coast mine-sweepers became intolerably heavy. Many of
them had been taken away to Lough Swilly, to Milford,
and now to the Belgian coast, with the result that it was
possible to sweep the North Foreland-Flamborough lane
only once a day instead of twice. This, of course, increased
the risks to our coastwise traffic, but in view of the limited
number of trawlers and the demands made upon their
services, such risks could not be avoided.
On November 17th, 1914, there came out from Heligo-
land a submarine with the number " U18 " painted on
the hull. Never did a craft leave port with so much
hatred of her enemy, nor with greater assurance of achiev-
ing success. She was a vessel of about 200 feet length,
with surface speed of 20 knots and radius of 3,000 miles.
Her crew consisted of a Kapitan-Leutnant, a Leutnant
zur Zee, and a Marine Oberingenieur as officers, am
twenty-four ratings. All were animated with the
intention of seeking out the Grand Fleet and attacl
it, no matter at what cost. Proceeding across the Noi
Sea, the submarine arrived off the southern end of t]
Dogger Bank at night, running on the surface, but when
British destroyer approached at high speed soon aft
CH. vni] UlS'S DISAPPOINTMENT 353
4 a.m., she was compelled to submerge to a depth of
9j fathoms, and did not dare to rise again to the surface
until about half-past eight. While awash she had sighted
many fishing craft on the Dogger Bank, and had avoided
them successfully, though one had signalled to her. At
nine o'clock on the morning of the 19th, U18 was off
Whitby, and she continued on her northerly journey,
coming up to the surface every hour for her commander to
look round and take bearings. Two days later she was off
the Moray Firth, and patrolled there all day at slow speed,
sighting one of the mine-sweeping gunboats in the distance.
Off the Pentland Firth the submarine observed the armed
trawlers towing their explosive sweeps, and saw also some
destroyers. Then her commander perceived how difficult
it would be for him to penetrate the close screen protecting
the Grand Fleet. In Germany among naval officers no
place was so much talked about at this time as Scapa Flow,
but so far no submarine had succeeded in getting right
inside. It was the fixed intention of this U-boat captain
to succeed where others had failed, and to torpedo the
IRON DUKE. Having proceeded farther north, the sub-
marine was off Fair Island about midnight of Novem-
ber 22nd-23rd, and in the early hours of the morning,
whilst it was still dark, she passed through the British
patrol lines and made towards Scapa Flow. At 7.30 a.m.
she entered Pentland Firth, having waited till slack water,
and then, in the sure hope of finding the Grand Fleet
and of attacking it, passed north of the Pentland Skerries.
A steamer was seen to be heading for Scapa Flow, so the
submarine followed in her wake, making for the entrance,
and hoping to be able to slip into the harbour astern of her
unobserved. Looking through his periscope, the German
captain noticed that Scapa Flow was protected by means
of an anti-submarine boom, and he took his craft close up
towards it until he could scan the whole of the harbour.
This was the crest of his success and the beginning of
his downfall ; for the nest which he had hoped to foul
was empty ; the Grand Fleet was not there ! It was a
bitter disappointment after so long and trying a voyage.
The men had not been out of their clothes since leaving
Heligoland. The captain at once surmised that the Fleet
was at Cromarty, and he determined to follow there.
His supposition was incorrect ; for, had he but known it,
354 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
the Grand Fleet had coaled during the night of the 21st
and put to sea early on the following morning, to
make a sweep down the North Sea towards Heligoland.
The helm of the U18 was now put hard over, and she
came out again, intending to get to the Moray Firth. She
had not run more than about a mile and a quarter from
Hoxa Head, which is on the eastern side of the entrance
to Scapa Flow, when suddenly a violent blow was felt.
The captain and first lieutenant realised the situation
when the submarine took a list of fifteen degrees. What
was worst, the most effective periscope had been carried
away. The fact was that above them, on the surface,
thanks to a good lookout and skilful handling, the Scapa
mine-sweeper Dorothy Gray had been able to ram the
periscope, bending it over, and to strike the submarine's
hull aft, causing considerable damage. Another trawler,
the Tokio, had been the first to see the periscope. The
Dorothy Gray, being nearer, acted promptly and effectively.
The ramming happened at 12.20 p.m., and the submarine
was not seen again for another hour, during which time
twenty-seven German officers and men spent some of the
most anxious and exciting moments of their lives.
After the blow struck by the Dorothy Gray, the lower
tube of the damaged periscope at once filled with water,
but the submarine went on in a mad endeavour to escape.
She submerged to eleven fathoms. Half an hour later
she managed to fix her position, and then, getting on to
her course, submerged again to the previous depth. Life
thereafter to those confined in U18 became an unceasing
struggle to escape from the most horrible of deaths. The
trawler's attack had put much of her mechanism out of
gear. First, the hydroplane motor gave out and suddenly
jammed. The result was that the craft could not be con-
trolled to a normal depth. She rose and sank erratically,
at alarming angles, so that at one time she was rushing
upwards and about to break surface, whilst the next
moment the vessel nose-dived towards the bed of the sea.
Tanks were emptied and again flooded ; the submarine
descended to 27 J fathoms — 165 feet ! Then twice in quick
succession there came a bump, indicating that the hull had
touched the hard bottom of the sea. Up the submarine
came to the surface, and then followed another crash.
This time she had been rammed by the destroyer GABBY.
CH. vm] THE DOOMED U-BOAT 855
What happened during the ensuing period is best de-
scribed in the words of Oberleutnant Neuerburg, second
in command : " The boat shot upwards and down-
wards ; the men rushed forward and aft ; the flooring
became slippery with the oil carried out of the engine-
room by the men's feet ; the men slipped." Down the
craft went again, striking the sea bottom, then rose, and
descended once more, this time to over 230 feet. " Then,"
declared Oberleutnant Neuerburg in his narrative, " we
shot upwards so violently that I gave up all hope. . . .
From the conning-tower came the report, ' Steering gear
jammed — man the hand wheel.' And then from the
engine-room : * The motors have broken down ! ' " The
boat eventually began to rise, and then suddenly the cap-
tain pushed open the conning-tower hatch. She had a
heavy list, a hole torn in her starboard tanks, rudder
gone, propellers badly damaged. " As I came on deck
I saw how the periscope was almost broken off short. . . .
Suddenly there was a smell of burning. Someone shouted,
' The battery is on fire ! ' The captain gave orders that
the boat was to be sunk. We drifted helplessly in the
currents of Pentland Skerries. No. 2 fired star-signals
to draw the attention of the signal-station . . . two
destroyers were approaching at full speed. The captain
fired off the stern torpedoes in order to allow the water
to enter through the tubes. . . . Spreuger (the engineer
officer) tore open the flooding valves . . . then the boat
sank. ..."
It was at 1.30 p.m. that the submarine had for the last
time come to the surface, and the crew were seen on deck
with a white flag flying. She had foundered about five
miles east by south of Muckle Skerry, the largest of the
group of rocks which lie at the eastern entrance to the
Pentland Firth. The two destroyers which came up were
the ERNE, with Admiral Sir Stanley Colville on board,
and the GAKRY. The latter picked up all the officers
and men with the exception of one man, a stoker, who
was drowned. So ended the career of the craft which
had proposed to sink Admiral Jellicoe's flagship.1 Up
1 " Bi« Deutschen U-Boot» in ihrer Kriegsfftkrung, 1914-18," states
(vol. i, p. 18) that U18, as she was returning from Scapa Flow, was sighted
a*d chased, and that she struck the rocks whilst proceeding submerged,
and was compelled to come to the surface and surrender ewing to the
damage sustained.
356 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vin
to this date, though the Auxiliary Patrol had been
doing most excellent work, no chance had come their way
of sinking a submarine, and to trawler Dorothy Gray,
No. 96, belonged the honour of being the first auxiliary
vessel in naval history to achieve such a feat. This in-
cident was most wholesome in its effect ; it convinced
the Admiralty that these small ships and fishermen crews
could do all that might be asked of them, and to the crews
themselves it imparted an increased confidence in their
ability. A healthy spirit of rivalry was excited, and
amidst the depressing monotony of the patrol there was
no man who was not cheered by the belief that some day
he might help to send a submarine to the bottom.
" I wish," wrote Admiral Colville to the Admiralty,
44 to draw their lordships' attention to the excellent work
done by Trawler No. 96, the skipper of which worked his
craft most successfully in chasing and ramming the
submarine." 4C Hearty congratulations to Trawler 96,"
telegraphed the First Lord, " for brilliant service, which
their lordships will mark by a substantial reward." In due
time came the reward : £500 to the skipper (Chief Skipper A.
Youngson, R.N.R.) and crew of the Dorothy Gray, and £100
to Tokio. But, apart from any pecuniary prize, there was the
knowledge that a fishing- vessel, manned by a fishing crew,
had performed distinguished service in ridding the sea of
a dangerous enemy, and had created a most encouraging
precedent. That the enemy was determined to penetrate
into the area known to be frequented by the Grand Fleet
was made evident by the persistence with which submarines
cruised off the Orkneys. On the day after U18 was
rammed and sunk another of these craft was seen by
H.M.S. DRYAD off the east side of the Orkneys, and again
on the following day the trawlers won the praise of the
Royal Navy. That day, off the same part of the coast,
a submarine was netted, though she was not destroyed.
As soon as she was sighted trawlers gave chase, whilst
an outlying trawler got the intelligence through to H.M.S.
SKIPJACK, which followed the submarine till, as she was
approaching gun range, the craft dived and was not seen
again. " I consider most praiseworthy," reported Com-
mander Preston of the incident, " the way these two
trawlers, 79 and 80, carried out the chase and promptly
gave information." Such evidence of the trawler's effec-
CH. vm] THE SCARBOROUGH RAID 357
tive value was as welcome to the Commander-in- Chief
as to Whitehall. The Lords of the Admiralty wrote to
Sir John Jellicoe that they noted with satisfaction the
apparent increase in the value of the trawler patrols,
and desired that he would cause an expression of com-
mendation to be transmitted to the commanding officers
of these two trawlers.
The raid on the Yorkshire coast on December 16th was
in strategy, and to a great extent in tactics, practically
a repetition of the raid which had occurred off Gorleston
a few weeks before. In results, however, this Yorkshire
raid was the more serious. Each of these raids revealed
the same deliberate, well-planned scheme ; in each oc-
curred the arrival off the coast at dawn, the bombardment,
and the endeavour to entice British squadrons on to
mine-fields in carefully chosen areas, mines being sown
close inshore in the hope of destroying British flotillas
and light forces, as well as out to sea where the battle
fleet might be expected to pass. But the mines laid off
Flamborough Head were far more numerous than those
which had been scattered off Yarmouth.
On the morning of December 15th a portion of the
Grand Fleet left Scapa, Cromarty, and Rosyth, and swept
down the North Sea, accompanied by seven destroyers.
About 5 a.m. these destroyers suddenly encountered a
German force, consisting of cruisers and destroyers, to the
eastward of the Dogger Bank, proceeding in an opposite
direction — that is to say, on a north-westerly course. An
engagement ensued, and three of our destroyers were
badly hit, though one of the latter claimed to have tor-
pedoed an enemy cruiser. This proved to be the advanced
screen of the German High Sea Fleet, and just before eight
o'clock, as it was getting light, enemy cruisers appeared
off Scarborough. Whilst three of them bombarded the
town, the fourth cruiser steamed east- south-east towards
Flamborough Head and laid an extensive mine-field.
These four ships represented only part of the main force,
for prior to reaching Scarborough the squadron had split
up, the VON DER TANN and DERFFLINGER making for this
seaside resort ; the other division, consisting of the
SEYDLITZ, MOLTKE, and BLUCHER, steering for Hartlepool,
which was also bombarded till just before nine o'.clock,
when these vessels made off to the eastward. A few
358 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
minutes later, the two Scarborough raiders appeared off
Whitby and also bombarded that place, after which the
whole of the force made its escape. It had come via
the open passage existing between the Tyne and Humber
mine-fields, and the ships which had gone north to Whitby
and Hartlepool had kept shoreward of the Tyne mine
area. But on their return journey, between these two
old mine areas, the enemy's light cruisers and destroyers,
forming the German screen, were sighted and fired on by
the British light cruisers about 11.30 a.m. Owing to the
mist they escaped. About midday the Second Battle
Squadron also sighted enemy cruisers and destroyers
steering east by south at full speed ; and again the raiders
eluded puisuit. It was a very fortunate adventure for
the Germans ; but for the bad luck in regard to the mist
and rain, they would have been severely handled.
This raid is of immediate interest as illustrating the
part which the Auxiliary Patrol had in the affair. There
was afterwards reason to assume that the force which
had encountered British destroyers in the morning
had steamed up to the north-west corner of the
Dogger Bank, and there laid some mines to entrap the
Grand Fleet. At any rate, a quarter-past nine that morn-
ing, the fishing trawler Blanche, which had come to the
Dogger Bank to fish, sighted a mine, the position being
about seventy miles N.E. $ E. of Flamborough iHead.
The skipper, Mr. John Wilson, took his ship close up to
it, and as he had no weapons for sinking it he dropped
a dan-buoy to mark it, lay alongside it for an hour, and
definitely ascertained that it was a moored mine and that
it had five horns. The trawler then steamed half a dozen
miles, when she sighted a destroyer ; there is a reason
to think that this was a German destroyer which had
accompanied the first squadron, encountered at five o'clock
farther to the south-east, and had just finished laying
mines. " As we altered our course to go to him," stated
Skipper Wilson, " he steamed away in the east by north
direction. When we first saw him he had his head on
the east-south-east course, and the wind was north-north-
west, fine breeze and rain. I saw it was no good steaming
after him, so proceeded homewards, as I think he was the
one that laid the mine. If he had been English he would
have waited, as he could see we altered our course towards
S51
CH. vni] A TRAWLER'S PREDICAMENT 359
him." This destroyer had evidently been in action, for
her mast appeared to have been shot away, but the Blanche
at this time was unaware of the Scarborough raid. Skipper
Wilson acted as one might have expected him to do ; and
as he could not sink the mine, he abandoned all thought
of fishing, steamed back to the Humber, and gave infor-
mation to the guardship H.M.S. VICTORIOUS in the river.
Then he steamed out to his fishing-ground again, and
when about sixty-five miles N.E. J E. from Flamborough,
shot his trawl and fished all night. When daylight came
he found another mine waiting for him. He was deter-
mined to sink it, though many men would have been
content to leave it alone. " We hove our gear," he said,
" and then made fast a liver barrel half filled with water,
attached to a 50-fathom wire buoy- line, and this we towed
with the object of bursting the mine." The intention was
by this means to strike the horns and so explode the mine.
The attempt was made four or five times, and then, as
the effort failed and darkness was coming on, he gave it
up, buoyed the mine with a dan- buoy, and for the next
two or three days continued fishing in its vicinity. It
was a risky thing to do, for his ship might at any moment
have been blown up by striking a mine, or his trawl might
have caught the mooring wire and brought about an
explosion. There can be no question that these were
mines. Within a few days the fishing- vessel Ocana, in
almost the very spot where the Blanche buoyed her first
mine, hit one of the horns of a mine and foundered.
Another fishing steam trawler, the Cassandra, had an
excellent view of the retreating enemy on the day of
the raid. This Hull trawler suddenly found herself in
the midst of a modern naval engagement between powerful
ships, while she was quietly trawling as if the sea were as
safe as in peace-time. Her skipper, Mr. H. Pegg, after
wards related his experience : " On December 16th, 1914
at noon, I had just left the bridge to get a bit of tobacco,
when the mate shouted down the cabin that he could
hear the firing of big guns. I immediately went on deck,
and there rushing towards us was a big German cruiser
accompanied by a torpedo flotilla, steaming about south-
east. About seven or eight miles to the westward were
our Fleet, firing as hard as they could. Immediately, we
were surrounded by flying shells. You could hear them
360 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
whistling overhead and see them falling all round us.
As the Germans were passing us, the big cruiser fired a
shot which passed between our bridge and funnel and hit
the water about fifty yards away from us. Simultaneously
I saw two shells hit one of their destroyers, and all I saw
was a tremendous upheaval of water and then nothing
more. This all lasted about fifteen minutes." By this
time the trawler's skipper had got in his gear and was
steaming towards the land. " About 3 p.m., no warships
then being in sight, I saw what looked like a mast sticking
up out of the water, about south-west of us, and immedi-
ately bore away towards it. Getting a better view, I
made it out to be a submarine with two masts, the fore
one longer than the after one, and having a cross-tree
to it (the fore one). This I surmised must be a German,
and we kept after him for about a quarter of an hour,
but he outdistanced our ship easily. Last seen, he was
going about south by east to south, time being 3.45 p.m."
It was not long before the mine-field laid by the raiders
off Scarborough began to bring forth disaster upon dis-
aster. Happily the battleships, battle cruisers, cruisers,
and destroyers, in spite of the risks they ran in the chase,
had escaped the danger. Thus one portion of the enemy's
plan had miscarried ; but the losses to merchant shipping
were to be alarming, and the toll of human life was great.
The enemy had barely finished laying his mines when the
Norwegian s.s. Vaaren struck a mine about three and a half
miles north-east by north of Filey and foundered, her crew
being picked up by the trawler Clon at 9.15 a.m. Twelve
hours later the British s.s. Elterwater also ran on a mine and
foundered three miles east of Scarborough ; and the same
evening the Princess Olga went down five miles east-north-
east of Scarborough. Still further to increase the peril to
our shipping, three German torpedo-boats at sunset laid
more mines on the Dogger Bank, seventy miles north-
east by east of the Spurn. Next day the City, which
had on board several of the dead seamen from the collier
Elterwater^ reported that the sea off Scarborough was strewn
with mines. The extent and direction of this latest
mine-field was then, of course, unknown, but the day after
the raid all traffic between Flamborough and the Tyne
was stopped, except during the hours of daylight.
Down to the day of the Scarborough raid, as has been
CH. vni] THE FOULED SEA-ROAD 361
stated, a swept channel existed from the North Foreland
to Flamborough. Up and down this channel streams of
ships passed. Owing to the existence of other mine-fields
already mentioned, vessels were practically restricted to
this lane. It had been swept daily and patrolled daily
and was used with confidence. But now the enemy had
laid snares along this sea road, and the results were serious.
Until the Clon had picked up the Vaaren's crew it was not
known that a new mine-field had been laid, and only the
disappearance of the other merchant ships that day gave
even a vague indication of the mine-field's actual position.
It was now the duty of the mine-sweepers to ascertain
the limits of this danger area, and to get rid of the mines
as quickly as possible. Orders were sent by Admiral
Charlton instructing the mine-sweepers to work from
Flamborough Head to Hartlepool, with a pair of Fleet
sweepers, and destroyers from the Ninth Flotilla were
sent to sea so as to stop all south-going ships from entering
the mine-field.
Although arrangements were made to extend the
swept channel northward from Flamborough, and the
passage of merchant shipping was stopped, the situation
was embarrassing. A hold-up of cargo vessels throttled
trade, besides causing an inconvenient congestion of
traffic at focal points. On the other hand, if they were
allowed to proceed, they ran considerable risk. It was
therefore decided to make a compromise, and to allow
ships to pass by daylight, warning them to keep within
two miles of the shore. The actual mine-sweeping com-
menced on December 19th. From Grimsby came groups
of trawlers which not many weeks ago had been fishing
for food. There came, too, the paddle-steamer Brighton
Queen, which had early that summer been running excursion
trips on the South Coast. From Lowestoft were sent eight
sturdy drifters to assist in keeping merchant ships off
the mine-field ; and, as if to complete the representative
character of the auxiliary craft, from the northward came
a motor-vessel usually engaged in summer cruising which
at the beginning of the war had been transferred to the
White Ensign. H.M.S. SKIPJACK, under Commander L.
G. Preston, R.N., also arrived to assist the trawlers.
The personnel engaged on this big scheme had come from
most parts of the world. North Sea fishermen who had
362 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
been trawling off Iceland, sportsmen fresh from fishing
in Canadian waters, seamen working in cross-Channel
packets or liners when the war broke out, others, again,
who were yachting as recently as the preceding July, as
well as naval officers, were soon busy, all bearing testimony
to the great brotherhood of the sea.
In order to ascertain how the mines lay, it was essential
to sweep at all states of the tide. None except those who
have served off this inhospitable coast during the few
daylight hours of a December day can realise the anxieties
and difficulties of the task. Gales spring up at short
warning, and as Bridlington and Scarborough, the only
adjacent harbours, could not be entered at all states of
the tide, Grimsby — involving a long passage for small craft
along an unlighted coast — was the nearest port available.
Trawlers keep the sea in almost any weather, but they
draw a good deal of water, especially aft, and thus at
any moment they were in peril of falling victims to the
hidden mines.
Thus the operations began, Commander R. H.
Walters, R.N., in the Brighton Queen, being the officer in
charge. The trawlers passed out with their sweeps to
clear the seas of hidden death. It was not long before
the inevitable happened. The mine-sweeping trawler
Passing, commanded by Lieutenant G. C. Parsons, R.N.,
ran into a mine, which blew a hole into her bow so large
that a small motor-car could have been driven through it.
She was a magnificent type of trawler, stoutly built, and
fortunately her bulkheads held. The Brighton Queen was
able to take her in tow and beached her on the Scarborough
sands, whence she returned later on to Grimsby to be
repaired. But immediately after the accident to the
Passing, the mine-sweeping trawler Orianda (Lieutenant
H. Boothby, R.N.R.) hit a mine a mile and a half south-
east of Scarborough Castle and blew up. One of the crew
was killed, but Lieutenant Boothby got the rest of his
men away safely. The next trawler to suffer misfortune
was the Star oj Britain (Lieutenant C. V. Crossley, R.N.R.),
three violent explosions revealing the cause of the injuries
she had received. On the first day's sweeping, and within
ten minutes, three trawlers had struck German mines.
Commander Preston took the SKIPJACK very gallantly to
the middle «f the mine-field where explosions had taken
CH. vm] SHIPPING HELD UP 363
place, and there anchored his ship between the trawlers
and the mines which had been swept up. The mines
which had occasioned so much trouble were then sunk.
The first day's sweeping failed to define the extent of
the dangerous area, but at least it was established that
mines had been sown thickly from a position in lat. 54° 18',
long. 0° 15' W. to the shore. Next morning the sweeping
was continued, and further disasters occurred, the first
about 9 a.m. The steam-yacht Valiant, under the com-
mand of Admiral Barlow (one of a good many retired
flag officers who had volunteered for this, or other, perilous
work), on passage up the coast on her way to Cromarty,
struck a mine near Filey, disabling both her propellers
and rudder ; she soon began to leak badly. Two trawlers,
at no mean risk, crossed the mine-field to her assistance,
bringing her to anchor off Scarborough. This action
was all the more meritorious since it was low water at
the time. Next day the Valiant was taken in tow by
the steam-yacht Eileen, commanded by Admiral Sir
Alfred Paget, who had also returned to the Service on
the outbreak of war. After temporary repairs in the
Humber, she was towed down the North Sea and English
Channel and up the Irish Sea for overhaul.
About an hour after the Valiant's accident, the armed
patrol trawler Gar mo also struck a mine off Scarborough.
She turned right over and sank, one officer and five men
being lost. So the dangerous work went on during the
cold, depressing December day. Groups of trawlers
under Lieutenant G. C. Parsons, R.N., and Lieutenant-
Commander Bernays, R.N., worked their hardest under
most trying conditions. By December 22nd, Commander
Walters was able to report a safe passage from Flamborough
Head to Filey Brig buoy within half a mile of the shore ;
but north of that point the channel was only partially
swept. Meanwhile the Humber had become crowded
with shipping. Unable to proceed on their voyages,
merchant vessels had run up the river and come to anchor
in its sandy waters. No fewer than forty-eight commer-
cial vessels of all sizes — tramp steamers, transports, colliers,
food ships, timber ships, oilers — were waiting, and the
numbers were daily increasing. But, again, there was a
difficulty. Serious as was this delay financially to- the
owners and others, yet it could not have been avoided,
364 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
as was suggested by the further report that the Norwegian
s.s. Boston had struck a mine three miles east-south-east
of Scarborough. She was beached on the north side of
Filey Brig.
Already a flotilla of fourteen trawlers was sweeping
off Scarborough, in addition to the drifters and the motor-
boat Euan Mara. No fewer than thirty-five mines had
so far been destroyed, and it was impossible to tell how
many more might be hidden. Christmas Day, 1914,
will long be remembered by East Coast fishermen as a day
of tribulation, but a day on which these fishermen made
heroic history. At 11 a.m., whilst sweeping south from
Whitby, the trawler Night Hawk struck a mine and foun-
dered about five and a half miles east of Scarborough.
Only seven of her crew of thirteen were saved, including
the commanding officer, Sub-Lieutenant W. A. Senior,
R.N.R. The s.s. Gem came along, struck a mine and blew
up seven and a half miles south-east of Scarborough Rock,
with the loss of ten lives, including her master. The
s.s. Eli, under the Norwegian flag, also struck a mine and
eventually sank three miles south-east of Scarborough.
The day was marked by a fine exhibition of pluck on the
part of these Lowestoft drifters. The " Commodore "
was Skipper E. V. Snowline, of the Trawler Reserve.
Although a gale was blowing, this seaman, instead of
running for shelter, stuck it out and kept his station in
order to prevent other vessels getting into the mined area.
In spite of the heavy seas, his drifter, the Hilda and Ernest,
faced the weather and the risk of being mined and stood
by the Gallier, a British steamer which had also struck
a mine, Skipper Allerton in the drifter Eager showing
the same hardihood. Not to be outdone by the drifters,
Skipper T. W. Trendall, in the mine-sweeping trawler
Solon, on his own responsibility went to the assistance of
this ship. It was low water ; it was dark ; the Gallier
was showing no lights. The Solon had to search for her
during the gale in the middle of the mine-field, yet in
the end she was safely brought into Scarborough. Never
did British sailors in peace or war perform a more unselfish
and heroic act on Christmas night. For their gallantry
the King awarded the D.S.C. to both Skipper Snowline
and Skipper Trendall.
The following day a channel had been cleared, and traffic
CH. vm] CLEARED AT LAST 365
was permitted to pass, but only in daylight. The s.s.
Linaria next foundered two and a half miles north-north-
east of Filey Brig. Destroyers were sent from the seventh
and Ninth Flotillas to patrol the extremity of the Scar-
borough mine-field until the channel had been completely
swept and buoyed, to prevent commercial traffic from pas-
sing through at night or by any unauthorised routes, and
to check further mine-laying. But on the last day of the
year 1914, still another steamer was blown up four miles
north-north-east of Filey Brig. By that date, however,
a channel had been swept and the principal buoys laid ;
most of the work had been done, and the paddle-steamers,
which drew less water than trawlers, were pressed into
the Service. The trawlers were, indeed, wanted every-
where. They were required to sweep up the Tory Island
mine-field, and still more were needed for service in the
North Sea in order to prevent mining activity being
resumed. The sweep off Scarborough continued, and
on January 6th the Banyers struck a mine off that port
and sank. Her commanding officer, Lieutenant H.
Boothby, R.N.R., had already been blown up on December
19th in the Orianda, but again he escaped death, and
afterwards he was awarded the D.S.C. Next day the s.s.
Eljrida also hit a mine and went down two miles north-
north-east of Scarborough. But at last, in spite of the
hindrances through heavy weather, this dangerous mine-
field was so far swept up that a buoyed channel was
established right up to a point abreast of Hartlepool,
and the merchant traffic, thanks to the vigilance of our
patrols and the daily diligence of the mine-sweepers,
was able again to carry on right away down the North
Sea to the English Channel.
Such is the narrative of the Scarborough mine-field.
Although it brought about the loss of valuable lives, as
well as of a few trawlers and merchant ships, it did not
diminish the strength of the Grand Fleet by a single unit.
Undoubtedly the laying of mines on the Dogger Bank,
just before and on the day of the raid, was part of the
scheme to entrap the Grand Fleet. On December llth
and the two following days, Skipper W. Pearce, of the
fishing steam trawler Dane, sighted seven floating mines
in various positions approximately between seventy and
ninety-eight miles north-east by east of Scarborough,
366 AUXILIARY PATROL AT WORK [CH. vm
and, as has already been mentioned, the trawler Blanche
found a mine on the day of the raid and a German destroyer
near-by in a position roughly seventy-five miles north-
east by east of Flamborough, where on December 23rd
the trawler Ocana foundered on a mine. On December
18th the Blanche observed another mine in much the same
position. On January 31st mines were also reported
between eighty-five and 100 miles north-east of the Spurn.
These may or may not have been laid in connection
with the Scarborough raid. At any rate, the Dogger
Bank mine-field was in existence, in addition to the other
areas, and thus the lot of the fisherman was rendered
still more dangerous.
CHAPTER IX
THE GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE
As the war progressed, the Royal Navy became increas-
ingly dependent upon the ships of the Auxiliary Patrol.
The chances of the Grand Fleet ever meeting the High
Sea Fleet in decisive action, so long as German hopes
rested on the war of attrition, grew more than ever remote.
Warfare by means of mine and submarine was seen to be
the enemy's settled policy, and therefore the demand for
small craft continued unabated. The trawlers and paddle
craft, employed in great numbers, were proving effective
in keeping down the mines, but the problem of the sub-
marine presented greater difficulties. In November 1914
it became manifest that the Germans were about to
make a determined attack on vessels using the English
Channel ; in other words, they would try to cut the lines
of communication with France, and thus strike a deadly
blow at the British armies.
The object of the Germans, apart from any damage
which they might inflict upon merchant ships and trans-
ports, was to draw away to the south anti-submarine
craft which could not be spared from the north, and
thus cause a dispersion of British effort. The naval
authorities were consequently confronted with an em-
barrassing situation, for the condition in northern waters
had not improved. As an illustration, on December 3rd
another effort was made by the enemy to attack the
Grand Fleet, when a submarine penetrated the eastern
entrance of Scapa Flow. The patrol was on the alert ;
the destroyer GARRY, which had been in at the death of
Ul8, engaged this other submarine twice. The enemy
fired a torpedo and then managed to escape. Simul-
taneously, therefore, the war of attrition was being con-
ducted with energy in the North Sea as well as in the
25 367
368 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
English Channel. The immediate needs of the Grand
Fleet, so far as enemy mining operations were concerned,
was met by dispatching further railway steamers to act
as Fleet sweepers, and in the meantime attention was also
directed to the protection of the main base of the Fleet
against submarines.
An incident on November 23rd concentrated attention
on the English Channel. On the afternoon of that day
submarine U21 sank by gunfire the s.s. Malachite, near
Havre. Two days later three trawlers, Cleopatra, Jackdaw,
and Warier Priory > were ordered from Yarmouth to Ports-
mouth, with three R.N.R. officers in command. Twelve
armed trawlers fitted with guns and the modified explosive
sweep were also sent. This flotilla was intended to
operate in the English Channel against submarines, to
sink drifting mines, and to board any suspicious small
craft which might be supplying submarines. These
trawlers were directed to patrol the transport route between
Spithead and Havre. Thus began a new system of coastal
patrols which was to make for increased efficiency in
combating the submarine.
By the first week of December about sixty lieutenants
and sub-lieutenants R.N.R., trained in the Merchant
Service, had been drafted to bases of the Auxiliary Patrol
for the command of armed trawlers and as leaders of
units ; another fifty officers of the same force were also
undergoing instruction in Torpedo School ships prepara-
tory to being sent to trawlers. In vessels where there was
no suitable cabin a temporary cabin was being erected,
and one in every six trawlers was fitted with wireless
telegraphy, although the supply of telegraphists had
become temporarily exhausted. Trawlers were still being
taken up and fitted out with the utmost dispatch. Four
were sent to Queenstown, though some time was yet to
pass before submarines penetrated Irish waters.
Prior to the war, there existed at the Admiralty a
Committee which dealt with the submarine problem ;
but for some reason this had been disbanded when hos-
tilities broke out. It was now obvious that the submarine
menace had to be carefully studied and guarded against.
Early in December a Submarine Attack Committee was
setup at the Admiralty, Captain Leonard A. B. Donaldson,
R.N., being president. At this date there were only four
CH. ix] INDICATOR NETS 369
known methods of dealing with the submarine. A patrol
vessel could sink it by ramming ; she could blow it up
with the explosive sweep ; she could sink it by gunfire ;
or she could entrap it by means of nets, which were
then being evolved. Owing to the shortage of guns,
many patrol vessels were still unarmed, and thus their
only weapon was their stem. But ramming, as every
student of past naval history is aware, is a far more
difficult operation than appears at first sight. Modified
sweeps, for the purpose of exploding over a submarine,
were being supplied as fast as possible, but before an
enemy can be blown up it must be known where he is.
It was on the development of the net that attention was
now centred. Preliminary experiments had been going
on for some time. As far back as October a scheme
had been suggested by Captain H. M. Doughty, the
commanding officer of the Devonport Gunnery School,
for the employment of nets and floating buoys with or
without explosives ; and experiments with nets were
made at Harwich and Lowestoft under Captain Ellison
and Lieutenant Menzies, the original idea being to employ
fishing-nets such as are used by drifters. These soon
developed into what were technically known as " indi-
cator nets," the purpose of the buoys being to indicate or
" watch " as soon as the submarine got into the net.
The idea was that when a submarine became entangled,
the section of the mesh would be broken off and thus the
propeller would be fouled. Simultaneously, the sub-
marine would announce its presence by causing the buoys
to " watch." Nets are employed in peace-time by
drifters which put to sea for the herring fishery. Drift-net
fishing is quite different from trawling along the sea-bed.
Just as the trawlermen's experience had so happily fitted
them for sweeping up mines, so the driftermen with their
ships were the experts at hand to go out and entrap sub-
marines. During the winter of 1914-15 the Admiralty
took up a considerable number of drifters from the east
coast, forty-four being hired from the little port of Lossie-
mouth alone. Instructions were sent to Lowestoft that
these craft were to be fitted out with the utmost dispatch.
This task was to go on day and night, all other work being
deferred if necessary. Thus by January the Admiralty
had quite a large flotilla of these vessels ready for service.
370 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
The increasing efficiency of the yacht and trawler
patrols had already impressed the Board of Admiralty,
and a scheme was planned for the armed patrol of the
entire coasts of Great Britain and Ireland by auxiliary
craft. It had been drawn up by the Admiralty in con-
junction with the War Staff, and was modified slightly in
detail to meet the criticisms of Admiral Jellicoe. In the
fewest words, the scheme divided the British Isles into
twenty-one areas, plus the Clyde and the Nore areas.
These different areas were to be patrolled by 74 yachts
and 462 trawlers and drifters. Their duty was to pre-
vent mine-laying, and capture or destroy mine-layers ;
prevent the operations of submarines and destroy such
craft ; prevent spying and capture spies. Motor-boats
were to assist in these duties in sheltered waters. The
needs of each area strategically were carefully considered,
regard being paid to the indented nature of the coastline,
the proximity of trade routes, and the opportunities for
submarine activity and successful mine-laying. Under
the scheme every part of the British Isles would be sys-
tematically patrolled, thus making the work of the enemy
more difficult. With this improved organisation was
instituted a general revision of the allocation of auxiliary
ships. Some stations had their numbers increased, others
had vessels taken away, according to the strategical neces-
sity. The Northern Trawler Flotilla came under the same
control as the Scapa Flow Flotilla, thus making it possible
for trawlers to be detached in case the Grand Fleet left
the Scapa base. The following were the areas now con-
stituted, provision being made to ensure rapid trans-
mission of the intelligence gained by the yachts and
trawlers :
I. Loch Ewe and Stor-
noway.
II. Shetland Islands.
III. Orkney Islands.
IV. Cromarty.
V. Peterhead.
VI. Rosyth.
VII. Granton.
VIII. Tyne.
IX. Humber.
X. Yarmouth and Har-
wich.
XI. Dover.
XII. Portsmouth.
XIII. Portland.
XIV. Devonport.
XV. Milford (with base at
Rosslare).
XVI. Liverpool, Kingstown.
and Belfast.
CH. ix] SUBMARINES IN THE CHANNEL 371
XVII. Lough Lame. XX. Galway Bay.
XVIII. Lough Swilly. XXI. Queenstown and
XIX. Blacksod Bay. Berehaven.
In addition there were the Clyde and Nore areas, as
already mentioned.
Submarine activity rather than mine-laying was at this
period causing the Admiralty the greatest amount of
anxiety, and especially in the English Channel. At one
time it had seemed almost unthinkable that German sub-
marines would dare to penetrate the Straits of Dover and
sink merchant and passenger ships at their will. Gradu-
ally the awakening came. First on October 14th a sub-
marine torpedoed the Amiral Ganteaume carrying refugees
from Calais to Havre; on October 31st H.M.S. HERMES
was torpedoed in the Dover Straits ; then on November llth
H.M.S. NIGER was torpedoed close inshore near Deal;
on November 23rd the Malachite was sunk, as has been
already mentioned, not by torpedo, but by a submarine's
gunfire near Havre ; and finally, on November 26th, the
s.s. Primo was destroyed also by submarine gunfire off
Cape d'Antifer. These incidents, which have already been
described, showed that the enemy was able to disregard
the British mine-field across the Dover Straits, and was
determined to attack any kind of ship, without restricting
himself to the recognised limitations of legitimate warfare.
On December 22nd Admiral von Tirpitz forecasted a
submarine campaign against our commerce. The crisis
was reached when in the dark hours of the morning of
January 1st H.M.S. FORMIDABLE was sunk off the Devon-
shire coast by U24. Thus the submarine operations had
developed in a brief space from a dangerous menace into
an offensive campaign of a deadly nature. If, for the
moment, the English Channel seemed to be the chief area
of attack, evidence was not wanting that the North Sea
was not being neglected. On Christmas Day two torpedo-
boats patrolling well up the Firth of Forth had torpedoes
fired at them, and submarines were sighted out at sea by
three of the Town class light cruisers which had come from
Rosyth. Such places as the Fame Islands in Area VIII,
Kinnaird and Rattray Heads were being used as points
of arrival by enemy U-boats from the other side of the
sea. There was, therefore, wide scope for the work of
372 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
the Auxiliary Patrol in watching wherever submarines
were likely to operate. In the twenty-three areas men-
tioned patrol vessels maintained constant vigilance, and
in addition to these the mine-sweepers carried on their
routine duties wherever required. Thus, by the end of
the year 1914 there were in all 750 yachts, patrol trawlers,
mine-sweeping trawlers, drifters, paddle sweepers, motor-
drifters, and motor-boats, in which 190 officers of the
Royal Navy and Royal Naval Reserve and 250 officers of
the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve were serving. Officers
and men were keen and needed only improved devices
for the arduous work entrusted to them, and these gradually
were perfected.
On January 2nd, 1915, the First Lord of the Admiralty
(Mr. Winston Churchill) made a request for four drifters
to be sent to Dover. They were to carry out a number
of experiments under Captain E. C. Carver, R.N., in the
laying of nets under a system devised by Admiral of the
Fleet Sir A. Wilson. Four drifters were accordingly ordered
next day from Lowestoft, and formed the nucleus of a huge
fleet which was presently to be transferred to the White
Ensign for the special service of entrapping submarines.
To those unfamiliar with ships the difference between
a trawler and a drifter may not be evident. They are
built for entirely different purposes, and have distinctive
features in size, construction, design, and personnel. The
drifter is smaller than the trawler, and usually is built of
wood, though a few are of steel ; she has no powerful
winches and but one capstan ; in lines she is but slightly
modified from the old sailing drifters ; and, unlike the
steam trawlers, she relies very much on her mizzen, not
for speed, but for sea-keeping ability in bad weather and
for riding to her nets. Her engine speed is rarely more
than 9 knots, and she puts ito sea for only a few days
at a time, returning to port to land her fish and take in
coal and water before going out again. The drifter's
crew is small, usually numbering not more than eight or
nine all told ; and she is more often than not manned by
members of one family. Frequently the skipper is the
father or father-in-law of the mate. The engine-man is as
likely as not the latter' s cousin, and the rest of the crew,
if not having some sort of relationship to the skipper, at
least come from the same fishing-village. The result in
CH. ix] DRIFTERS AND THEIR CREWS 373
working is that the drifter, while nominally in command of
the skipper, is actually run by a kind of committee. To
split up this co-operation would have impaired the efficiency
of the ship. Consequently, when the Admiralty took over
hundreds of drifters they usually accepted the crews en bloc,
and the men served in most cases till the end of the war.
Nothing afloat is more clannish than a drifter crew,
especially if the men happen to come from the same
village on the north-east coast of Scotland. The very
names of the drifters are typical of the crews — a curious
mixture of Old Testament piety blended with modern
ambitions and family pride. Such names as Integrity,
Breadwinner, Courage, Diligence, Direct Me, Effort, Enter-
prise, Faithful Friend, Friendly Star, Girl Margaret, Boy
Bob, Golden Effort, Good Tidings, Hope, Peacemaker,
Present Help, Protect Me, Star of Faith, Sublime, suggest
the simple, straightforward, plucky, homely men usually
found in these craft. The four drifters sent to Dover as
the forerunners of the great fleet that was to follow were
the Young Fisherman, Sedulous9 Nine Sisters, and Ocean
Comrade. Dover became the cradle of the indicator-net
method of anti-submarine warfare. Large numbers of
drifters were taken up at Lowestoft and Yarmouth, thirty
of which were sent to Dover alone.
Their arrival, fresh from their fishing occupation, came
rather as a surprise to naval men at Dover, accustomed to
smartness and well-found gear. These were an ordinary
group of fishermen in their warm jumpers, without naval
kit, unaccustomed to discipline, and banded together in
ships that obviously needed a refit, for they had defects
in hull and machinery and were ill-found in respect of
lamps, warps, and other gear of the sea. But the main
thing was to get the ships to Dover, and then as soon as
possible to train the crews, so that with no avoidable
delay nets might be strung across the Dover Straits and
submarines prevented from entering the Channel to sink
our shipping. Captain Humphrey W. Bowring, R.N.,
was appointed to take charge of this new drifter organisa-
tion, and the first trial at shooting indicator nets from
these craft was made on January 15th, 1915, under the
superintendence of Rear- Admiral the Hon. Horace Hood,1
1 Rear-Admiral the Hon. Horace L. A. Hood, C.B., M.V.O., D.'S.O.
lost his life in the Battle of Jutland.
374 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
commanding the Dover Patrol. Day after day the
drifters went out into the Channel to learn their lesson,
and as if to show the urgent need for nets, submarines were
being reported from all parts of the English Channel —
from Christchurch Bay, the Channel Islands, West Bay,
Berry Head, and elsewhere.
A hundred miles of nets were sent to Dover. More and
more drifters kept arriving, together with sinkers with
which to moor the nets, dan-buoys with which to mark
them, clips with which to secure them. There were all
sorts of difficulties to overcome. The clips, for instance,
were a constant source of trouble. They had to be strong
to stand the strain when the nets were being hauled in ;
at the same time it was necessary that they should be
weak enough to carry away as soon as the strain of the
submarine in the nets came. Then there were the strong
tides in the Dover Straits to contend with. Nets dis-
appeared under the water and were carried away ; others
caught on wreckage. For a time the whole scheme
seemed doomed to failure. However, by dint of dogged
perseverance, the co-operation of many brains, and the
adaptability of the fishing crews, one after another of the
problems approached solution. By the middle of January
nets had been moored just N.N.E. of the Varne Buoy,
and it was found that a drifter could shoot 300 yards
of nets in a heavy sea within half an hour, though even-
tually this time was very considerably shortened. By
the end of January Dover Harbour was becoming pretty
full of these small craft ; for there were already fifty or
sixty drifters and more were arriving.
A really satisfactory net- ship had yet to be designed,
but with improvements in apparatus and training it had
become possible to shoot 800 yards of nets in eight minutes.
At that speed a submarine could quickly be surrounded
by an awkward mesh. Preparations were soon on foot
to send a few of these drifters to lay their nets off the
Belgian coast. On February 3rd the Sedulous and four
other drifters, escorted by destroyers, left Dover in charge
of Captain Bowring for a rendezvous two miles south of
the North Hinder Lightship, where they arrived early next
morning. The drifters shot their nets in the neighbour-
hood of Thornton Ridge, the destroyers meanwhile
patrolling. On the 5th the drifters returned to Dover.
CH. ix] NETS ACROSS THE STRAITS 375
No submarines had been trapped, but valuable experience
had been gained. Next day a conference took place at
the Admiralty on the laying of indicator nets, at which
Admiral Hood was present, and a week later the Dover
Net Drifter Flotilla was in full working order, endeavour-
ing to close the Straits to hostile submarines. Thirty
little drifters stretched across the Channel, riding to their
nets and forming a curtain between England and France
in the strong tideway that goes rushing by. Every
evening the drifters took their nets aboard, and at day-
light shot them again. Having regard to the force of the
tides, the bad weather, and the difficulties of working the
nets, the Admiralty considered the progress made to be
encouraging. It was determined to employ drifters and
indicator nets in other areas as well. Preparations were
made for establishing net -bases at Cromarty, Peterhead,
Firth of Forth, Yarmouth, Harwich, the Nore, Portsmouth,
Portland, Poole, Falmouth, and Devonport. The nets used
were of two types, one 30 feet deep and the other 60 feet
deep, each net being 100 yards in length. So quickly did
the organisations grow that by the third week in January
there were sixty-three drifters stationed at Poole, twenty
at Falmouth, fifty-four at Dover, a dozen at Scapa, and
four each at Portsmouth, Firth of Forth, and Cromarty.
Sixteen drifters were also sent to Harwich to lay eight
miles of indicator nets two miles on either side of the
Cork Lightship in case a submarine were to be sighted
inside the Cork, and two miles on either side of the Ship-
wash in case the U-boats were seen inside the Sunk.
It appeared for a time as if the Navy had in the indicator
net the solution of the main submarine problem. The
Admiralty wasted not a moment in equipping every suit-
able base. And then occurred a series of events, sudden
and ominous, which gave a still further impetus to this
newly- adopted device. Hitherto submarines had pene-
trated to the north of Scotland and well down the English
Channel, but at last a submarine appeared in the Irish
Sea and acted pretty much as she liked. On January 28th
the armed drifter R.R.S., when about three miles north-
west of Bardsey Island, sighted what she believed to be
two submarines. Next day, at 1.45 p.m., Walney Island
Battery, Barrow, sighted a submarine about 7,000 yards
out at sea. The enemy craft opened fire, but all her
376 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
shots fell short. The battery returned the fire with eleven
rounds, and the submarine disappeared.
It proved to have been the U21, commanded by that
enterprising officer, Kapitan-Leutnant Hersing, whose
destruction of the Malachite and Primo in the English
Channel has already been described. She had travelled
much farther to the westward than a submarine had
attempted before. U21 was not long in the Irish Sea,
but during her stay she caused havoc and consternation.
From Walney Island she cruised about for a while,
and on the next day, January 30th, hovered off the
approaches to Liverpool and sank three merchant ships,
the Ben Cruachan, the Linda Blanche, and Kilcoan,
in practically the same position. From there she may
have taken a tack over towards the Irish coast, for on
January 31st the Holyhead- Kingstown packet Leinster,
which was at last torpedoed and sunk in the autumn of
1918, sighted a submarine twenty miles east of the Kish
Lightship. Thence the U21 probably cruised south, for
at 8.30 a.m. on February 1st she had an unsuccessful
encounter with a vessel of the Auxiliary Patrol. The
yacht Vanduara was on passage from the Clyde to Ports-
mouth, and, when well down the Irish Sea, about thirty-
three miles north-west of Fishguard, she sighted a sub-
marine on the surface, trying to head her off. The sea
at the time was fairly smooth. The Vanduara altered
course so as to bring the yacht's bow on to the enemy,
and the submarine began to submerge. The yacht opened
fire at 3,000 yards, and finally closed at 2,000 yards, her
last four shots falling extremely close. The submarine,
however, was not hit, and got back safely to Germany, to
spread a false report that the " auxiliary war vessel " did
not hoist the British " war flag." This was denied by
the British Admiralty on the strength of a statement by
the Vanduard's captain : "I was flying no colours, but
hoisted the White Ensign before opening fire."
It was reported that all the crew of U21 received from
the Kaiser the Iron Cross as a reward for their work for
the Fatherland. This cruise undoubtedly gave a great
stimulus to the enemy and suggested endless possibilities
for the overseas submarine. The immediate affect was
twofold. All shipping was forbidden to enter or leave
Liverpool, and the Holy head- Kingstown service was
CH. ix] MORE YACHTS COMMISSIONED 377
suspended for the next few days. It proved also the
necessity of strengthening the patrols in an area in
which under-water craft had not been expected. Admiral
Jellicoe suggested the use of indicator nets across the
North Channel, to which the Admiralty agreed. Mean-
while, British merchantmen were instructed to keep a
sharp lookout for submarines, display the ensign of a
neutral country, and show neither house-flag nor identifi-
cation marks.
On January 21st submarine U19 had overhauled and
sunk by bombs the s.s. Durward, twenty-two miles north-
west of the Maas Lightship — that is, well off the Hook of
Holland. Admiral Hood stated that there was little
doubt that enemy submarines were passing through the
Downs at night-time, and one was reported every few
days. On February 1st, the day of the Vanduarcfs
engagement, the hospital ship Asturias was attacked by
submarines fifteen miles north-north-east of Havre, but
happily the torpedo missed. On the following day
trawlers fired on a submarine off Dieppe.
Evidence accumulated on every hand that submarine
warfare was increasing in intensity. At the beginning of
February three large submarines left Cuxhaven to operate
in British waters. It was well known to the British
Admiralty that Germany had become possessed of sub-
marines capable of going to and operating in the Mediter-
ranean. This was not a little alarming, and to meet the
menace still more small craft were required. Many
yachts had voluntarily been offered for charter, others
had to be requisitioned ; and of these last one fine vessel
was taken compulsorily because the owner, a lady with
a fine spirit, refused to let the yacht go unless she was
allowed herself " to share the perils of the crew." As the
number of yachts in the service increased, the shortage
of guns became an embarrassment, and some of the bigger
yachts had to surrender part of their armament. No
yacht could be spared more than a couple of guns, and
the net drifters received none. Some drifters were given
the modified explosive sweeps, and all were supplied with
bombs.
Not only was the number of patrol vessels increased,
but simultaneously improvements were made in . the
organisation of patrol areas. For instance, Area I, which
378 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
had been originally based on Aultbea, an out-of-the-way
place forty miles from the nearest railway-station, was
now based on Stornoway, and Admiral Sir Reginald Tupper
was appointed in charge there. Alterations were also
made in Areas IV, V, and VI, it being realised that enemy
submarines desiring to attack British warships in Cromarty
or Scapa Flow would probably seek the very convenient
landfall in the vicinity of Buchan Ness, Rattray Head,
and Kinnaird Head, after the voyage across the North
Sea from Heligoland or the Skaw. By placing the various
units of Auxiliary Patrol craft in the modified Areas V
and VII, an off-shore squadron was available to prevent
submarines making a landfall or entering Areas IV and VI.
The Admiral of Patrols was relieved of the control of all
auxiliary vessels in Area X, these being placed under
Commodore George C. Cayley l at Harwich, whilst the
northern portion was allotted to Captain Alfred A. Ellison,
C.B., at Lowestoft.
Simultaneously with a careful reconsideration of anti-
submarine patrols, the ever-present mine question had
to be studied afresh. In order to safeguard ships, especi-
ally mine-sweepers, various mine-catching devices were
tried, affixed to the ships' bows, but they were clumsy
and in bad weather soon carried away. Mines were being
found in unexpected places, some of them having drifted
from their original areas. From the Tory Island field
mines had been carried up the west coast of Scotland
and had become a menace to the Tenth Cruiser Squadron,
employed on important patrol duties ; several ships had
sighted and sunk some of them ; and the armed merchant
cruiser CLAN MACNAUGHTON of this squadron, which
mysteriously disappeared on the night of February 2nd,
1915, almost certainly struck one of these mines off the
Hebrides. Mines were reported off Whitby. Some had
exploded in fishermen's nets out in the Nortu Sea twenty-
four miles east-north-east of Smith's Knoll. The sailing
trawler Fleurette caught mines in her trawl whilst fishing
forty miles east of Lowestoft.
Early in February the Admiralty commissioned at
Barrow two paddle steamers, the Queen Victoria and Prince
Edward, and fitted them to lay nets on a very extensive
scale. Each could carry no less than 4,680 feet of net
1 Afterwards Rear- Admiral George C. Cayley, C.B.
CH. ix] ORGANISATION OF PATROLS 379
of a specially designed heavy mesh, with sinkers and
buoys complete. The intention was to lay the net in
the quickest possible time without stopping. The secret
of quick net-laying is to arrange that the net shall run
out freely without any check. For this purpose these
two vessels had all superstructures removed, and special
troughs were fitted from which the nets could run out
over the stern whilst under way. Acetylene lamps, care-
fully screened, were provided, as the net-laying was to
be done at night.
After six months of war Germany's naval position was
already determined, and then came the " war zone "
declaration of February 1915. The British Admiralty
was not unprepared for this development. All round the
coasts of the British Isles the various patrols were active,
having had the advantage of several months' experience
in their duties. Two routes were possible for enemy
submarines seeking to get far afield. They would penetrate
either via the North of Scotland or through the Dover
Straits. The organisation at the time was as follows :
Assuming the enemy should proceed north of the Shet-
lands, .the Shetlands Patrol, consisting of three yachts
and eighteen trawlers, was on duty. It was considered
more likely that a submarine would pass through the Fair
Island Channel, the north side of which formed part of
the Shetlands Patrol area, the southern part being con-
trolled by the Orkneys Auxiliary Patrol. The duty in
this area was divided among three patrols : the Northern,
the Western, and the Southern Patrols, based on Kirk-
wall, Stromness, and Longhope respectively. These three
patrols comprised between them no fewer than ten yachts
and seventy-two trawlers. Drifters with indicator nets
were also employed in the northern portion of the Orkneys
and at the entrance to Scapa Flow. As it was known that
enemy submarines were accustomed to dive to about
eleven fathoms when harassed by small craft, the patrol
vessels fitted with the single sweep were ordered to tow
it at this depth.
Similarly in the South of England there was a detailed
organisation. Besides the British mine-field across the
Dover Straits, which actually proved of little practical or
moral effect, for the reason that most of the mines drifted
away, there were a number of armed drifters guarding
380 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
the northern approach to the Downs, patrolling north
and south in line abreast. These craft, under Captain
H. E. Grace, R.N., were based on Ramsgate. They were
worked in three divisions, each under its own leader, and
two divisions were always on patrol, the third resting in
harbour. They patrolled four days and nights, spending
the two next in port. A few miles below them was the
Dover Net Flotilla, riding to their nets across the Straits.
Having received intelligence of impending activity in
the English Channel, the Admiralty issued instructions
on February llth warning the bases that submarines were
expected to pass through the Straits on the next and
following days, and that they had been lately making
the Varne Lightship and Buoy when so passing into the
Channel. Captain E. C. Carver, R.N., was given orders
to keep as many as possible of his Poole drifters cruising
on February 12th and the following days between St.
Alban's Head and St. Catherine's and twenty miles to
seaward. The Commodore at Portland was similarly
advised that his trawlers should cruise between Portland
Bill and St. Alban's Head and twenty miles to seaward.
The Commander-in- Chief at Devonport was directed to
have his trawlers patrolling between the Eddystone and
Start and twenty miles to the seaward. But, in spite
of this vigilance, submarines passed through the patrols.
On the 13th one was sighted off St. Valery-en-Caux, and
another twenty- five miles west- south- west of Cape Gris
Nez. On the 15th U16, while on her way south from
Heligoland, chased the s.s. Laertes between the Schouwen
Bank and the Maas, after having been compelled to
remain submerged for some hours owing to fog off Calais
afterwards torpedoing the British collier Dulwich
miles north of Cape d'Antifer. On the same day H.M.I
UNDAUNTED and eight destroyers had a torpedo fired
them when off Dungeness. Next day, ai 2 p.m., UK
sank the French steamship Ville de Lille close to Caj
Barfleur. On February 18th she torpedoed the Fren<
s.s. Dinorah north of Dieppe, and then returned
Heligoland.
Already twenty- five net drifters were on their wa]
from Falmouth to Larne, where they were to operate ii
the North Channel, as suggested by Admiral Jellicoe,
and to deny that passage to submarines. They stai
CH. ix] IN IRISH WATERS 381
with only their fishing-nets on board, but as soon as
they could be supplied wire indicator nets were to be
sent. Another twenty-five drifters were under orders
for Milford, this number being increased eventually to
fifty. Their mission was to foil the enemy at the southern
end of St. George's Channel. Indicator nets were also
laid in the Firth of Forth, from the east end of Inchgarvie
to Longcraig Pier.
On the day that the German submarine blockade began
the Admiralty were already making bold alterations in
the organisation of the Auxiliary Patrols, in order to meet
this intensive warfare. It was obvious from recent events
that the patrols in the Irish Sea required strengthening con-
siderably. Rear- Admiral H. H. Stileman,1 of Liverpool,
had enough to do in looking after the local Liverpool area,
for which duty his force consisted of a yacht, two armed
trawlers, and ten armed drifters. Hitherto he had been
in command also of the Kingstown and Belfast patrol
craft, but these areas were to be modified as follows :
The Auxiliary Patrol force in Area XVII (Larne) was
placed under a flag officer, Admiral C. J. Barlow, late in
command of the yacht Valiant, being appointed. He
was stationed at Larne and given general control of Areas
XV and XVI— that is to say, the whole Irish Sea. At
his disposal was a " flying squadron " of six large armed
yachts, in addition to his other auxiliary craft. These
were the Valiant, Jeanette, Marynthea, Medusa, Narcissus,
and Sapphire, based on Belfast, but available for use
anywhere in Areas XV, XVI, and XVII for concerted
action or otherwise. The motor-boats at Belfast remained
there, but the Belfast Patrol unit was withdrawn to
Kingstown, where Rear- Admiral E. R. Le Marchant 2 was
appointed in charge of the base and in immediate com-
mand of Area XVI. For this purpose he was allotted
three yachts and eighteen trawlers, with an additional two
dozen drifters shortly to be sent out to him. Besides
these two flag appointments, Rear-Admiral Charles H.
Dare 3 was appointed to command the auxiliary base at
Milford Haven and in immediate charge of Area XV, the
force assigned to him being four yachts, twenty- four
1 Afterwards Rear-Admiral Sir H. H. Stileman, K.B.E.
2 Afterwards Vice- Admiral E. B. Le Marchant, D.S.O.
3 Afterwards Admiral Sir Charles H. Dare, K.C.M.G., C.B., M.V.O.
382 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
trawlers, and fifty drifters ; ten of the latter were
armed.
Strategically the North Channel between Antrim and
the Mull of Cantyre resembles the Straits of Dover between
England and France. The instructions to Admiral Barlow
were to deny the North Channel to enemy submarines and
mine-layers. For this purpose he was to have a yacht,
eighty drifters, and eighteen armed trawlers, and from
February 22nd all merchant ships were forbidden to use
the channel. These drifters were to be disposed about
a parallelogram thirty miles long and twenty- two miles
wide, towing their nets across the channel, thus making it
a very unhealthy place for a U-boat. A five-mile space at
each end of the area was to be occupied by advanced
patrol lines. Thus, it was hoped, a submarine would
either have to pass through the channel south of Rathlin
Island, or else, having dived to a depth of 90 feet, would
reach the vicinity of Lough Larne almost at the end of
her diving powers. Orders were given that the passage
south of Rathlin Island should be thoroughly patrolled
and denied absolutely to the enemy. Each drifter carried
at least 800 yards of net, which when laid out would be
almost invisible to a submarine at a distance of three
cables.
The instructions to Admiral Le Marchant were that his
principal duty was to watch the mail route from Holyhead
to Kingstown against submarines and mine-layers.
Admiral Dare was to hold the southern end of the Irish
Sea and the Bristol Channel, and always to have nets
down in positions where submarines might be expected to
make landfalls. When opportunity offered, the St.
George's Channel was to be netted, and he was to be ready
to send out all his drifters to shoot their nets across this
channel. On March 15th it was decided to establish a
sub-base for the Auxiliary Patrols at Rosslare. Larne
and Dover, because of their strategical similarity, now
became the two greatest net-bases. In both areas net-
drifters were at work in a strong tideway, at the entrance
to a region where submarines had proved exceptionally
dangerous. The tactical principle was identical in the
two areas. If the submarine should get into the nets,
each section of net was so easily detached that the one in
which the craft was entoiled would come away from the
CH. ix] THE DRIFTERS AT WORK 383
rest and foul the propellers, causing the enemy craft to
rise to the surface. For this purpose two things were
necessary : satisfactory clips that would allow the nets
to be detached at the right amount of strain, and indicator
buoys to announce that the net was about the U-boat.
It was only after weeks and months of experience and
much experimenting that these two essentials were
achieved.
By the last week of February the nets were in operation.
Across the Dover Straits they were kept in position by
night as well as day, except in bad weather. Each drifter
watched its own eight nets, and altogether there were
many miles of nets in use. Across the North Channel the
nets were working satisfactorily, except that the kapok
floats soon became waterlogged. This difficulty was
experienced in many other areas, so gradually kapok gave
way to small glass globes, which answered the purpose
very well.
The working of the indicator nets was a task entirely
new to officers of the Royal Navy ; the only people who
were at all expert were the drifter crews themselves, and
to their suggestions and skill the success achieved was
largely due. Without the fisherman and his drifter, it
would have been impossible to carry out this particular
method of harassing the submarine. Before February was
out, the merchant steamers on their way up and down
the English Channel and North Sea saw these wooden
ships with mizzen set looking after their nets near the
Shipwash Lightship, the Downs, Dover Straits, St. Alban's
Head, Start Bay, and in the vicinity of Falmouth, as well
as up the Irish Sea off the Smalls and North Channel.
There were many difficulties to contend with apart from
the securing of efficient clips and indicator buoys. Nets
were frequently lost in bad weather ; at Dover no fewer
than ninety nets were lost in a three days' gale. Another
sixty- eight nets were lost within two days and nights of
fine weather owing to various causes, especially by fouling
submerged objects. There was, moreover, a shortage of
officers, most of whom were junior Royal Naval Reserve
officers, to take charge of drifter divisions. The drifter
skippers themselves were found, generally speaking, to be
good, competent men, keen and enthusiastic in their work.
They stuck to their job in all sorts of weather, risking
26
384 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH, ix
destruction from mines and submarines, and keeping a
vigilant watch for the enemy.
The outlook was promising at this period. On Feb-
ruary 20th a submarine was reported by H.M. Destroyer
VIKING to be in the nets near the Varne. "It is
quite certain," stated Admiral Hood, " that a submarine
was in the net when it moved away from the VIKING.
I believe the net tore away, and when the buoy stopped,
the submarine got away." Nor was this the only incident
of the kind at this early stage. Information came to
hand that a submarine had been sighted fifteen miles
south of St. Alban's Head, and on February 19th a
Royal Naval Reserve sub-lieutenant was sent from Poole
with three drifters to lie to their nets near this spot for
twenty-four hours. They shot the nets about 2.30 p.m.
Nothing occurred until about twelve hours later, when
the skipper of the drifter White Oak saw a bright white
light to the northward crossing his bows to the west-
north-west. It was visible for a quarter of an hour,
and then disappeared. Twenty minutes later he saw a
dark object moving towards him, and called the ship's
boy to confirm his opinion. The indicating buoy of
the net next to the drifter then flashed, thus showing
there was something foul of the nets. The skipper called
the sub-lieutenant. For five minutes the light burned,
and then disappeared, and the nets seemed to move
towards the White Oak, the engines of which were moved
slowly astern for a couple of minutes to keep clear. Shortly
after this the warp began to tauten, and in order to
prevent its parting, three bladders were bent on to the
warp and the end let go. While this was being done,
several more lights were seen flashing in the direction of
the nets, but these and the buoyed end of the warp dis-
appeared almost at once. The drifter was then turned
to the eastward, and when daylight came she steamed
round about, but nothing more was seen of the buoys or
nets. Next day the same officer was again sent to the
spot, and repeated the procedure at 7.30 a.m. on the
following morning. He shot his nets, and they again
fouled some obstruction. This incident, though not con-
clusive, made it highly probable that a submarine had got
entangled in the nets. At the least, it afforded some
encouragement to the drifters. This was by no means
CH. ix] A SUBMARINE NETTED 385
unwelcome, for the submarines were unusually active.
Steamships were being attacked in the English Channel
and the Irish Sea. The neighbourhood of Beachy Head
was becoming a favourite resort for the enemy, five ships
having been sunk in that locality within two days. The
hospital ship St. Andrew was attacked ten miles north-
west by west from Boulogne, probably by one of the
same submarines, and three days later the s.s. Thordis
had an experience which has already been described.
In another area a trawler sealed the fate of a submarine
in somewhat exceptional circumstances. At about 3 p.m.
on February 23rd the steam trawler Alex Hastie, though
a Government vessel, was fishing 105 miles east- north-
east of the Longstone Lighthouse. She had recently put
down her trawl, and all available hands were working
at the catch which had just been hauled in, when a peri-
scope was seen approaching at great speed. It was too
late to slip the fishing-gear and try to ram. The sub-
marine's captain must have been either very inexperi-
enced or else certain that this was a disguised trawler,
and showed anxiety to keep astern of her, so that the
trawler's gun would not bear. The Alex Hastie, however,
was neither disguised nor armed. The submarine, in
attempting to pass close under the trawler's stern, appar-
ently did not count upon the trawl wires leading down
from the ship many feet below the surface. Suddenly
she fouled the wires, and on board the trawler the crew
listened expectantly to the twanging and creaking of the
! gear as it withstood the heavy strain. Then after a brief
I interval there rose to the surface a strange object, with
i no periscope or conning-tower showing. The U-boat was
on her beam ends. Having been caught in the trawl
wires, she had capsized, and twenty minutes later she
sank to the bottom, leaving a large quantity of oil on the
j water.
What had probably happened was that the submarine
| had caught her periscopes in the wires. As trawler wires
jare of 2 J inch, they stand a good deal of tension. There-
upon the periscopes were badly strained, causing the
glands through which they pass into the hull to leak.
Water poured into the vessel, and prevented her attaining
her upright position on coming to the surface. Further^
!nore, whilst on her beam ends the batteries would have
386 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
capsized their contents, and before long the ship's company
must have been asphyxiated. The Alex Hastie came into
port a proud ship, having by good fortune performed a
most valuable service, and the Admiralty divided £100
between the owners and crew.
This experience was followed by another curious incident.
On the last day of February 1915, a number of drifters,
based on Portland, shot their nets at daylight in a position
between the Skerries Buoy and Combe Point, Start Bay.
This was an area which it was believed was being used
by submarines. These drifters were under the command
of Sub- Lieutenant E. L. Owen, R.N.R. About 4 o'clock
in the afternoon of March 1st, when twenty nets were
down, a section of them was seen to sink, form a bight,
and then travel in a south-west direction. This was an
extraordinary phenomenon, because the wind was blowing
from the west, "and the west- going tide had not yet begun
to make. There was no possibility of mistake, for the
nets travelled about a mile and a half, and then were
found to be foul and could not be hauled in. Occasionally
they had to be veered out in response to violent pulls, as
if playing a fish. Vibration also was noticeable. A cast
taken with the lead showed only six fathoms, whereas the
chart gave nine and a half fathoms at that spot. It was
noticed, moreover, that the lead struck something hard.
This was followed by a sharp pull on the net, about
thirty yards being suddenly dragged out of the hold. A
dan-buoy was made fast to the net, which was then let
go. The nets continued to travel to the south-west inside
the Skerries until about 10.30 p.m., when they were
made fast to the stem of the drifter Sarepta, and she
anchored.
Early on the morning of March 2nd Sub- Lieutenant
Owen proceeded into Dartmouth in the drifter The Boys
to make his report, and then returned to the Sarepta,
finding her still at anchor with the strain on the nets. He
presently ordered her to let the nets go. At one end of
the nets the armed trawler SHELOMI had been patrolling.
An explosive charge was made fast to her sweep wire,
with a If-cwt. sinker. This was towed over the position
marked by the dan-buoy. About noon the wire fouled
twenty yards south- south- west of the buoy, and the
charge was exploded. A black patch of oil then came
CH. ix] THE STORY OF U8 387
to the surface, and widened to an area of over a hundred
yards in diameter. Two more ships also fired their explo-
sive sweeps over the spot. A diver was sent down on the
following day, and was unable to find anything ; yet it
seems extremely likely that a submarine had been in the
nets and was blown up, for oil was observed two days
after the explosion in thick patches about a mile away
from the spot, and large bubbles about a foot in diameter
rose and burst, spreading oil on the surface. Sweeping
operations continued throughout the day, but no obstruc-
tion was found. This was one instance in a long list of
highly probable sinkings of submarines, though the fate
of the craft could not be ascertained with certainty.
On the day that these operations closed, another enemy
submarine farther up the Channel met with certain
destruction, the best possible evidence being forthcoming
in the shape of German prisoners. The craft was U8,
commanded by Kapitan-Leutnant Stoss, the second in
command being Leutnant Morgenroth. The captain
was a very experienced submarine officer, having been
in that branch of the service for seven years. U8 was a
vessel of about 800 tons, fitted with four torpedo tubes,
and at various times she had been in most of the waters
of the British Isles. She had come out of Ostend in com-
pany with another submarine, and the sequence of events
was interesting. March 4th was a day such as is often
experienced in the English Channel during the early spring.
Periodically fog settled down. About 1 p.m., during a
sudden lift, a submarine was sighted five miles east-north-
east of the north-east Varne Buoy, by the officer of the
watch in the destroyer VIKING, whose captain at the time
was Commander E. R. G. R. Evans, second in command
of Scott's last Antarctic Expedition, who was destined
to add to his laurels in the famous BROKE and SWIFT
destroyer action in 1917. As soon as the VIKING saw
the submarine out of the fog, she attempted to ram her,
and promptly opened fire with the foremost gun. It was
too late, however, as the U-boat dived immediately. The
destroyer circled round, passed over the submarine's
wash, and began to follow a series of swirling pools which
moved north-west slowly for half an hour. The pools
then turned to the westward, and were followed for fifteen
minutes, when they turned west-south-west until about
388 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
4 p.m. The sea was calm, and the track of the under-
water craft was quite clear, so the modified explosive sweep
was fired by the first lieutenant. The swirl continued
for about 150 yards, and then ceased. Although the
VIKING waited near the spot for forty minutes, nothing
more was seen except some patches of oil. This may
have been the companion vessel of the U8, as Admiral
Hood suggested on examination of all the available facts.
No corroborative evidence, however, exists as to the
sinking of any U-boat as a result of this operation.
As to the U8 herself, the first incident in the narrative
is that the drifter Roburn got separated from the rest of
the drifters. When found, she was four miles south-east
of Dover, and she reported that about 12.30 p.m. she saw
a line of five pellets proceeding in a westerly direction
against the tide at about four knots. The skipper in-
formed the destroyer COSSACK, giving the bearing of the
object when last sighted. Undoubtedly there must have
been a submarine in the nets, for the movements of the
pellets indicated the struggle made by a U-boat to get
clear by going ahead and astern. At 1.15 p.m. wireless
signals from the VIKING concerning her submarine reached
Dover, and the stand-by destroyers of the Sixth Flotilla
at once proceeded to sea.
The information to the COSSACK was that a drifter had
caught something in her nets six miles north-east from
the north-east Varne Buoy. When Captain C. D. Johnson,
in the destroyer MAORI, with the stand-by destroyers left
Dover, he found the VIKING getting out her sweep. At
2.17 the destroyer KANGAROO sighted a buoy moving
fast to the eastward. An hour later a periscope was
sighted one mile north of the north-east Varne Buoy, and
at 3.51 the VIKING exploded her sweep four and a half
miles N. 30 E. of the north-east Varne Buoy. Five
minutes later a periscope was again sighted one mile
N. 20 E. of the centre Varne Buoy. The destroyers were
now ordered to close on this position, and at 4.10 a peri-
scope was seen a mile from the centre Varne Buoy. The
destroyer GHURKA got out her explosive sweep and ran
on a line of bearing north-west from the Varne Lightship
at right angles to the submarine's course, which was
signalled as S. 65 W., speed about six knots. At 4.40 the
MAORI again sighted a periscope proceeding in the same
CH. ix] THE SUBMARINE'S DESTRUCTION 389
direction. At 5 p.m. the GHURKA fired her explosive
sweep. Half a minute later the stern of the submarine —
U8 — appeared out of the water at an angle of 45 degrees.
Then gradually she came to an even keel, with her conning-
tower showing. The MAORI and the GHURKA each fired
a shot, hitting the conning-tower. Several Germans came
on deck, holding up their hands in token of surrender,
whereupon the order to cease fire was given. The de-
stroyers closed to the rescue, as the submarine's crew,
emerging from the conning-tower, rapidly followed one
another on to the deck. A German officer was seen to
throw documents overboard. The submarine sank within
ten minutes of breaking the surface. Meanwhile, ten men
were taken off by the destroyer NUBIAN'S boat, and four
officers and fifteen men by the MAORI'S boat. These
twenty- nine, the German captain declared, composed the
whole of the crew.
After the submarine went down, a large quantity of air
rose to the surface, but no oil. The pris6ners admitted
that for four hours they had been chased by destroyers.
Whilst U8 was travelling submerged at a depth of 65 feet,
an external noise was heard, which some of the men
likened to a slight explosion and others to a jar, as if a
lump of iron had been dropped on the deck. Later a
violent explosion occurred, which had the effect of causing
the vessel to leak. Water entered two compartments,
and there was a bad hole in the ship's hull. Orders were
given to blow out the main ballast tank, whereupon the
submarine came to the surface, the second engineer re-
maining below to sink her after the rest of the crew had
made sure of their lives. The captain appears to have
lost his presence of mind, the explosion having been so
violent that the bull's-eyes of the conning-tower were
either cracked or blown in ; some sea- water connection
was also shattered ; and, owing to a short circuit, the
engine suddenly stopped. Though the drifters had not
actually sunk the U8, they had rendered most valuable
help in her destruction. It was the opinion of Admiral
Hood that she had got foul of the drifters' nets, and so
eventually was forced to come to the surface. " The
destruction of the submarine," wrote the Admiral, " is
a great proof of the value of the modified sweep. It
appears that, in conjunction with the indicator nets, it is
390 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. TX
of the greatest value." The Admiralty rightly considered
that the crews of the trawlers and drifters which took
part in the hunt had contributed to the destruction of
the submarine, and they awarded £500 to be distributed
among them.
A day or two later Admiral Hood reported that eleven
miles of net had been laid across the Straits. " I am quite
confident," he stated, " that they form a real obstacle for
the enemy's submarines in the Straits. I was sure of this
before the destruction of U8, and I am quite certain now.
One of the most certain reports received from prisoners
of U8 was that she had been harried for a considerable
time ; she can only have been harried by the drifter fleet
and their destroyer support. . . . The destruction of U8 has
caused a real encouragement to the officers and men of
the flotilla."
Six days after the sinking of U8, another enemy sub-
marine, U12, met with a like fate. Again the Auxiliary
Patrol co-operated with the destroyers. For the best
part of four days the patrol yachts and trawlers hunted
this craft, the chase extending over 120 miles, until at
last, on March 10th, U12 was rammed by the destroyer
ARIEL outside the Firth of Forth and sunk. " Great
perseverance and skill," wrote Admiral Lowry to the
Admiralty, " were displayed by the officers and men of
the yachts and trawlers concerned. . . . The yachts and
trawlers, by their skill and steady persistence in antici-
pating the probable movements of the submarine, and
sighting her when she again came to the surface, materially
contributed to her destruction." Not only the Auxiliary
Patrol vessels, but private fishing trawlers as well, helped
in bringing about this satisfactory result of a long chase.
It was directly owing to information given by the private
trawler May Island that the submarine was sunk, and
to her owners and crew the Admiralty awarded £500.
To each of the three private trawlers Straihisla, Ben
Strome, and Olive Branch they sent £62. In addition,
five vessels of the Auxiliary Patrol received awards. The
armed trawlers Duster, Coote, Chester, and Martin were
each paid £62, and a similar amount went to the armed
yacht Portia.
There is reason to believe that on the day when the
ARIEL sank the U12, still another submarine was destroyed
CH. ix] A DRIFTER SKIPPER'S DARING 391
in the Dover Straits. On the previous day a submarine
had shelled and sunk the French steam fishing- vessel
Grisnez, belonging to Boulogne, at a spot twenty miles
west- south- west of Beachy Head. On the same day,
also, the s.s. Blackwood was torpedoed eighteen miles
south-west by south of Dungeness, and five minutes later
a second submarine was sighted. There was, therefore,
plenty of evidence that the enemy was still able to use
the Straits. Commander Evans, of the VIKING, observed
a chain of swirling pools one mile north-east of the north-
east Varne Buoy, and he proceeded to follow them. This
was at 1 p.m. At 4.8 p.m. the destroyer GHURKA came
along to assist, and the swirls eventually settled down to
a course N. 75 E. Both ships got out modified explosive
sweeps, and at 4.25 p.m. the GHURKA fired hers right in
line of the track three miles from the Varne Buoy. The
track immediately ceased. All the circumstances were
thus similar to those of the second submarine encounter
of March 4th. Again the drifters gave help. They were
with their nets to the east of the Varne, and the peculiar
track of the submarine suggested that she was trying to
avoid them on the west side of the Buoy.
The fighting spirit of the fishermen could scarcely have
been better in any age of our country's history. There
is something suggestive of Elizabethan sea-hardihood in
some of these fights against heavy odds. Nothing is more
typical of their daring than the cool audacity of the un-
armed drifter Rival. In the month of March submarines
were again infesting the Irish Sea, and in order to thwart
them, drifters were operating off the Smalls. One of these
was the Rival. On March 16th reports were received of a
submarine which obviously was lying in wait for a large
steamer that was making up -Channel. The Rival, though
she had no gun, determined to attack the enemy with her
stem, and the skipper did his best to ram with such deter-
mination that twice she narrowly missed hitting the sub-
marine, which, after a pursuit lasting a quarter of an hour,
dived and was not seen again. The Admiralty so highly
regarded this prompt action that they sent the skipper
an expression of their appreciation.
By the end of March the issue was made to Auxiliary
Patrol vessels of bomb- lances intended to be thrown at
submarines whenever the latter came near enough. Mean-
392 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
while an improved type of indicator buoy was required,
and experiments were being made at various bases. The
difficulty was to devise a buoy that would not strip its
piece of tin in a tideway and so expose its calcium phos-
phide, thus causing a light, and yet would strip and show
the light at the slow speed of a submarine dragging on
the nets.
There are no fishermen more hardy than those who
earn their livelihood in drifters ; they are unacquainted
with fear, and their ships, with their bold sheer and
pleasing lines and easy behaviour in a seaway, are exactly
suited for the crews who sail in them. April 3rd supplied
an illustration of courage and resource on the part of
one of these crews. The drifter Boy Willie was proceeding
down the English Channel bound for Milford, where a
very large flotilla of these craft were collecting to serve
under Admiral Dare. It was a wild day, with a westerly
gale blowing, showers of heavy rain, and thick weather
generally. At 8.30 a.m., the Boy Willie, when five miles
west- north- west of the Lizard, sighted a submarine. Near
the enemy vessel was a neutral steamer, whose conduct
seemed suspicious to the skipper of the drifter. The
submarine was travelling at such a pace that chase was
useless ; the drifter, too, had no gun, so the only thing to
do was to pass the news on. The Boy Willie put her
helm hard over, and hastened to inform the Falmouth
net- drifters which were operating off the Lizard. They set
to work to look for the enemy in spite of the nasty sea
that was running. At 1.30 p.m. a submarine was reported
off the Runnelstone. Four hours later she was again
sighted, the vessels of the Auxiliary Patrol keeping her
busy. Orders were sent for ten drifters to lay nets from
Lamorna Cove to the south-west before daylight, in case
the enemy craft should go into Penzance Bay. Nothing
was actually found, but one of the drifters, the Lily Oak,
on returning from patrol the next day, brought convincing
evidence that a submarine had gone through her nets on
April 4th, causing damage.
It was known at the Admiralty that in consequence of
our use of indicator nets the German submarines were
being fitted with a net- cutting device at the bows, by
means of which it was hoped to cut a way through these
entanglements. On more than one occasion a U-boat
CH. ix] A NARROW ESCAPE 393
made her escape by this means,- after having been well
caught in the nets. In other instances the submarine
seems to have got away with the nets about her, either
to sink or, with good fortune, to manoeuvre herself free.
Some such escapes were narrowly separated from total
destruction. Three days before the submarine had got
entangled in the Lily Oak's nets, the drifter Jeannies,
based on Yarmouth, Isle of Wight, was operating off
Christchurch Head in company with Torpedo-boat No. 027.
At 6.30 p.m. she had shot her nets. Two hours later the
Jeannies' skipper was standing by, when he noticed a
violent tug on the net wire. This could only mean a
submarine. The fast-revolving propellers were at the
same time distinctly heard, as if a submarine were right
underneath the drifter. Everyone familiar with the sea
knows that down in the hull of a ship sounds can be heard
much more distinctly than on deck. Wooden ships have
been known to pick up warning signals in foggy weather
by sending a man below, when nothing was audible above.
In this case so clearly were the noises heard in the drifter's
hull that the engineer came running up on deck, expecting
the ship every moment to be rammed by an approaching
vessel. The skipper fired a couple of green rockets to
inform the torpedo-boat that a submarine was in the
nets. The searchlight was switched on, whereupon the
submarine's engines stopped immediately and were not
heard again. It was found that the strain on the wire
warp had gone, and when it was hauled in the nets were
gone also. Unfortunately at this early period in the war
the depth-charge was not in use, or another would cer-
tainly have been added to the long list of destroyed
submarines.
Attention must now be turned to another aspect of
the enemy's offensive. German seamen were never favour-
ites with British sailors. Among the " square-heads,"
to use sea language, there were undoubtedly some first-
rate sailors, principally to be found in full- rigged ships
trading across the Atlantic, round the Horn, and up the
west coast of South America. But these men were the
exception. The outrages and horrors committed by
the German Army in its advance towards Paris, the sink-
ing of peaceful craft, with their passengers and crews, by
submarines, and the losses caused by the German raiders
394 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
on the high seas — all these incidents served to increase the
dislike of British seamen of everyone and everything of
German origin. In proportion as the submarines sank
British trawlers engaged in fishing, so the racial antipathy
deepened. The flame of resentment burnt not only among
the fishermen crews ; it was not less strong with the
trawler- owners. One firm wrote to the Admiralty : " We
beg respectfully to suggest that an Admiralty representative
at the principal fishing-ports might have the trawler
skippers before them, and instruct them as to how they
should act on sighting a submarine." This was a prac-
tical suggestion, and the Admiralty at once acted on it.
Arrangements were made to give instruction to skippers
of fishing- vessels in anti-submarine tactics. They were
advised not to work alone, but to navigate and fish in
close company for mutual support. They were warned
to keep a sharp lookout and maintain a good head of
steam, always being prepared to cut away their gear ;
if a periscope were sighted, the trawler was to be headed
straight for the submarine. Where ramming was im-
practicable, the skipper of a trawler was advised to blow
his whistle, fire a rocket, steer to windward of the enemy,
and stoke the furnaces so as to place a dense cloud of
smoke between the submarine and trawler, thus increasing
the chances of escape.
The sinking of our fishing craft during the spring and
summer of 1915 became a most serious menace, not only
because of the loss of ships, often accompanied by valuable
lives, but for the reason that it might cripple the fishing
industry, already reduced by the requisitioning of so
many hundreds of fishing-vessels for Admiralty service.
Between April 18th and May 4th eighteen fishing-vessels
had been lost in the North Sea by the action of submarines.
How to protect the industry was not an easy problem to
solve. There were two alternatives : either all the
fishing-vessels must be concentrated into a very few
fleets, with an Auxiliary Patrol operating close to hand,
or else, in order to prevent further disasters, they must be
kept in port. This second alternative, if adopted, would
have deprived the country of a valuable food commodity,
caused distress along the coast, and ruined trades depen-
dent on fishing ; in short, it would have brought about the
very conditions which the enemy was anxious to produce.
en. ix] PROTECTING THE FISHING FLEETS 395
In these circumstances a conference was held on May 8th,
1915, at the Admiralty. Officials from the British Vessels
War Risks Club of Hull, from the Board of Trade and
the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries were present, in
addition to the Admirals of Patrols and the Fourth Sea
Lord. The whole subject of naval protection of fishing-
vessels of the North Sea was thoroughly investigated.
Roughly, the North Sea fishing craft were divided into
four classes, each of which required special consideration.
The largest number of craft were those which fished on
the Dogger Bank. These fleets comprised 150 to 200
vessels, and so far neither mines nor submarines nor enemy
warships had prevented them from going about their
business. It was decided that the best means to protect
the Dogger Bank craft was to have naval patrols ; later
Auxiliary Patrol trawlers and steam-yachts were sent out
to ensure their safety.
The Aberdeen Fleet of about seventy vessels presented
somewhat different conditions. These vessels were accus-
tomed to fishing some distance off the coast, and arrange-
ments were made to protect them by two or three of
Admiral Simpson's armed trawlers from Peterhead. The
Grant on and Dundee fleets, it was suggested, should be
concentrated near Bell Rock. These vessels numbered
about forty- five. Finally, there were some fifty English
vessels working from Scarborough, Shields, Hartlepool,
and Sunderland, which fished between Sunderland and
Whitby. These also had to be concentrated in a place
convenient for patrol vessels. Experience had shown that
submarines usually avoided fishing fleets which kept well
together. Thus, in addition to its special work of hunting
and destroying submarines, the Auxiliary Patrol was now
charged with the duty of protecting the fishing fleets.
The need for protection had been brought home by
several unhappy experiences. A case in point may be
cited. On May 3rd the steam trawler Coquet was fishing
160 miles north-east of the Spurn. It was a fine, clear
day, with a light north-east breeze and a moderate
swell. Two miles away in one direction was the trawler
Progress, while the Hector was two and a half miles distant
in another. During the afternoon the Coquet was steaming
ahead at 3 knots, with her trawl out, when the conning-
tower of a submarine came up a mile away. The German
396 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
vessel headed straight for the trawler, and brought up
quickly on the Coquet' 's port beam, with engines going
astern and deck awash. On the submarine's deck were
seven men, holding on to the wire lifelines which ran
from the top and on the conning- tower to each end of
the craft. In the conning-tower were five others,
who were peering through Zeiss glasses. The submarine
captain hailed Skipper Odell, saying in good English, " I
will give you five minutes to leave your ship and come
on board here." The skipper stopped his engines and
the crew of nine got the trawler's boat over the side, amid
repeated shouts to them to " hurry up," and rowed
alongside the submarine, the men being then hauled up
on her deck. Five of the submarine's crew thereupon
jumped into the boat with an explosive charge and a
coil of time fuse. Meanwhile the submarine headed for
the trawler Progress, who had taken her for a British
submarine. The Progress now realised her mistake, and
getting in her trawl steamed away as hard as she could
go. For a while it was a keen chase, but the submarine
soon overhauled her. Skipper Odell and his men were
cleared from forward of the conning-tower to aft, as the
submarine was about to use her gun. During this chase
the water was washing the Coquet's men up to their
waists, their hold on the lifelines alone preventing them
from being washed overboard.
When at effective range of a quarter of a mile, the
submarine fired four shots at the Progress, whereupon
the latter stopped her engines, and the submarine
brought up about twenty feet off the trawler's starboard
side. Again the submarine gave the trawler's men five
minutes in which to leave their ship, and removed them
to the U-boat, from which a demolition party set off.
After the Germans had returned to the submarine, the
Progress's crew pulled away in their own boat, and when
300 yards away they saw the port side of their ship blown
right out, and she sank like a stone. The submarine
returned to the Coquet, having been away half an hour.
The demolition party had rummaged the ship, and brought
off all the charts, including one of the North Sea which
had marked upon it all mine-fields, both German and
British, as well as the fishing-areas. This chart the sub-
marine captain opened and scanned with great interest.
CH. ix] " SARNIA'S " GALLANT FIGHT 397
Then, having taken the trawler's provisions and other
articles, the Germans gave the men a few biscuits and
some butter and milk, in addition to the binnacle compass,
and cast them off in their own boat. The Coquet sank,
and the submarine, staying only to send the Hector to
the bottom with twenty rounds of gunfire, made away
to chase two more craft to the north-west. This in-
cident furnishes a typical instance of the way the enemy
sank fishing craft and cast their crews adrift. Such
conduct fired these fishermen's patriotic endeavours to
co-operate with the Navy.
Enthusiasm in the work was exhibited as much by
the Brixham smacks as by the Humber steam trawlers.
Information given by the Brixham smack Addax, when
fishing in the English Channel, to the armed boarding
steamer Sarnia brought about a spirited engagement
with under-water craft. The submarine was not sunk,
but, thanks to the prompt intelligence given, a valuable
ship was saved. The smack reported at 7 o'clock on the
morning of April llth that half an hour previously she
had seen a submarine following a steamship going south-
east. The Sarnia made off at full speed to search for
the enemy, and soon after 7.30 sighted the French s.s.
Frederic Franck, bound for London. The crew had
already left her, and were in the boats, and a submarine,
U24, was seen alongside the steamer, then about three
and a half miles off. As soon as the Sarnia approached,
the enemy submerged. The Sarnia then commenced to
circle round the steamer at 20 knots. At 8.15 the peri-
scope was seen about 800 yards away two points abaft
the port beam. Fire was opened on the U-boat, and the
Sarnia made towards her, but the periscope disappeared.
At 8.20 the periscope again appeared 700 yards distant
six points on the Sarnid's port beam, and a torpedo
was fired which the vessel avoided by skilful use of the
helm. The wake of a second torpedo was recognised, and
this torpedo was also avoided by the use of the helm
and engines. This torpedo, the Sarnia 's captain reported,
" would have been a certain hit had there been one
moment's delay in carrying out my orders either with
helm or engines." The Sarnia then made a signal by
wireless for destroyers to come to her assistance, and
proceeded to zigzag at full speed close to the Frederic
398 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
Franck so as to prevent the enemy from completing the
destruction of the French ship, and to keep him from
attacking other steamers which were passing within a
short distance, one of them being a Donaldson liner bound
down-Channel.
Every time the captain of the Sarnia sighted a peri-
scope he did his best to ram, but without success. At 9.15
it became certain that two submarines were operating, as
the periscopes of both were seen simultaneously, one four
points on the port bow and the other two points on the
port quarter. Fire was opened, and the Sarnia turned
to starboard to avoid exposing her beam to either enemy.
A shot from the after-gun struck the periscope of one of
the submarines, and a few seconds later the conning-tower
was just awash. The second shot fell a little short. Nothing
else occurred until 9.55 a.m., when the Sarnia missed
ramming one periscope by only a few seconds. The
Sarnia' s captain concluded that the submarine with the
damaged periscope then headed away, and the second also
broke off the action, for after 10.20 a.m. no trace was
seen of either of them. The destroyers presently arrived
and took the crew of the French ship on board. The
destroyer BITTERN towed the Frederic Franck until a
couple of tugs came out and brought her safely into
Plymouth. The Sarnia's captain, Commander H. G.
Muir, R.N.R., had fought his ship with great skill and
determination, and received an expression of appreciation
from the Lords of the Admiralty. The Addax having given
accurate information which enabled the Frederic Franck to
be salved, the Admiralty awarded the Brixham men £120.
These incidents illustrate the manner in which every
branch of the nation's sea services contributed to harass
and defeat the enemy. Fishermen, with their wonderful
eyesight, combined with alertness of movement and
quickness of decision, supported with fine loyalty the
Royal Naval Reserve officers, themselves possessed of an
intimate knowledge of merchant shipping and its ways;
destroyer officers and men showed a devotion beyond
praise ; the masters and men of handy tugs marshalled
all their peculiar knowledge and experience in coaxing
into port ships which could scarcely float; and finally,
officers and crews of merchant ships, threading their way
among unforeseen perils, played their part nobly in the
CH. ix] THE WESTERN END OF THE CHANNEL 39$
struggle. Never before in the world-seas had the great
brotherhood of seamen co-operated with such singleness
of purpose.
At the beginning of the campaign nothing was known
of the enemy's submarine strategy and tactics, and it was
only after many losses had been incurred and much careful
consideration given to the facts disclosed that these
began to be revealed. It was made clear by actual events
that Germany regulated her submarine operations with
characteristic thoroughness and system. The persistence
with which her under-water craft endeavoured to pene-
trate into the northern bases of the Grand Fleet, and
waited day after day to entrap squadrons and single ships,
showed that part of her plan was to reduce our prepon-
derance in sea- power. Collaterally with this attack on
the men-of-war she designed to destroy merchant shipping.
To this end Germany sent her U-boats to operate off those
points where merchant vessels most thickly congregated—
off the approaches to Liverpool, at the western mouth of
the English Channel, in the neighbourhood of Beachy
Head and Dungeness.
The enemy's plan having been revealed, at least par-
tially, the task which fell upon the Admiralty was so to
arrange the Auxiliary Patrol as to defeat the submarine
strategy. To be strong at every part of the coast was
impossible, but to have strong concentrations at likely
points of attack was at least feasible. The great drawback
was that the naval authorities were compelled to act
largely on the defensive. The defence of the English
Channel at its eastern end became daily more efficient
through the increased activity of the patrols and the use
of the indicator nets. In order to improve conditions at
the western end, trawlers were ordered to hasten from
Devonport to the Scillies, where shipping was being sunk
with impunity. By the middle of April a complete re-
organisation had been made of Area XIV, which included
the Scillies and the Plymouth neighbourhood. Falmouth
became the headquarters for the yachts, trawlers, and
drifters, Captain V. E. B. Phillimore, R.N., being placed
in charge of them. In this reorganisation the principle
of decentralisation was carried out. The area was sub-
divided into four sections : (a) Newquay to the Lizard ;
(b) Lizard to Looe ; (c) Looe to Dartmouth ; (d) the
27
400 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
Scilly Islands. To each of these sections was allotted a
steam-yacht and one and a half trawler units, excepting
the Scillies, which had two and a half trawler units. A
wireless station was installed at St. Mary's, Scilly.
Similarly, the Beachy Head vicinity in Area XII was
reorganised. This section extended from St. Alban's
Head to Dungeness. In order to strengthen it, the yacht
Conqueror and two divisions of trawlers were sent from
Great Yarmouth to Newhaven. From St. Alban's Head
to St. Catherine's the patrol of the area was maintained by
patrol drifters ; from St. Catherine's to Beachy Head by
a division of six trawlers ; from Beachy Head to Dunge-
ness by two divisions of eight trawlers. In addition, the
northern section of the transport route from Spithead to
France was watched by a division of six trawlers, and an
anti- submarine boom across the Channel from Folkestone
to Gris Nez was being constructed, to be watched by the
yacht Diane and her armed trawlers. From Dover nearly
200 trawlers and drifters were working in the Straits by
the beginning of April. But though the improvement in
the working of the nets there caused enemy submarines
to get caught and run away with the nets almost every
day, yet, as no satisfactory type of indicator buoy had been
evolved, it was almost impossible to tell when the sub-
marine had fouled the nets. However, in the course of
time the right kind of buoy was devised.
The Admiralty concluded that, since the sinkings off
Beachy Head had become so numerous, submarines were
accustomed to go to ground for the night in an eleven-
fathom hole two miles west of the Horse of Willingdon
Shoal. Before April was out they laid a number of sub-
Merged mines off Beachy Head, hoping thereby to destroy
the enemy. These mines were safe for vessels travelling
on the surface, but dangerous for any submerged vessel
or for one anchoring or fishing. The area was consequently
forbidden for the last-named purposes. At tiie same time
still more fishing-vessels were being taken up for the
patrols. A hundred were ordered to increase the Dover
Fleet. It was estimated that the total available number
of steam-trawlers in the United Kingdom was about
1,400. Of these the Admiralty had already taken up 975.
In some ports as much as 90 per cent, of the fishery fleets
had thus been requisitioned, in others practically the
CH. ix] LAYING NETS OFF OSTEND 401
whole number. Admiral Jellicoe again telegraphed that
the apparent increase in the number of enemy submarines
passing north about rendered the Orkneys, Shetland, and
Stornoway patrol specially important, and he asked for
more trawlers. The vicinity of the Butt of Lewis and
Cape Wrath required strong forces to protect the colliers
and other ships which supplied the Grand Fleet. On
April 29th the collier Mobile had been sunk by a submarine
oft the Butt of Lewis, although a special patrol had been
established in that vicinity.
With the design of entrapping enemy submarines as
they emerged from their own waters, the two paddle-
steamers, the Queen Victoria and Prince Edward, already
mentioned, were employed in April in a special operation.
On the evening of April 7th they left Harwich under Com-
mander Maurice Evans, R.N., escorted by the destroyers
LAERTES and LYSANDER, with orders to lay their nets off
the Belgian coast. For this operation they had long been
rehearsing. During the night they reached the Belgian
coast, but it was not possible to begin work until dawn,
as all the sea-marks had been removed. At 4.50 a.m. a
mile and a half of nets were laid off Ostend in twelve
minutes, the nets being 24 feet deep. Then, just as the
paddlers were finishing their task, the enemy's forts opened
fire and got off a hundred rounds at the Queen Victoria
and Prince Edward and the destroyers, as it happened
without causing damage. The intended surprise failed,
but the paddle-steamers and their escort made home
safely. On April 12th the Prince Edward laid a "trot"
a mile long east of the South Goodwins, to which in-
dicator nets were presently moored.
While developing their submarine attacks upon the
British merchant ships, the Germans in no way relaxed
their activities in mine-laying, and to meet the menace
the British Admiralty, by the summer of 1915, had five
separate classes of mine- sweepers in the Service. They
were (1) the Fleet sweepers, including the old gunboats
SKIPJACK and JASON ; (2) eight auxiliary sweepers char-
tered from the railway companies for the Grand Fleet ;
(3) the paddle-steamers which had been taken up for
rapid sweeping near the coast; (4) the mine-sweeping
trawlers ; and (5) another class lately introduced bearing
the old historic name of " sloop."
402 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
It being known to Germany that the armed merchant
cruisers of the Tenth Cruiser Squadron, engaged upon its
assigned mission to the north of Scotland in intercepting
ships, were using Liverpool for coaling and refitting, it
was deemed likely that mines would be laid on the route
to this base. The duty accordingly fell to the Lough
Swilly sweepers from Barra Head to Inistrahull periodi-
cally to sweep this area. There was also reason to suspect
that mines had been laid between the Humber and
Southwold mine-fields, and on April 17th the suspected
area was swept. No mines were discovered, though on
the way out from Grimsby, whilst crossing the centre of
the Humber area, the paddle- ships destroyed five moored
mines. A curious incident occurred on the day following
the exploratory sweep. Near the spot where the five
mines were found, two British trawlers, the Vanilla and
Fermo, were fishing. Three miles south-west of the Swarte
Bank a submarine torpedoed the Vanilla. The Fermo was
only 300 yards off, and she immediately went to pick
up survivors ; whereupon the submarine fired a torpedo
also at her, forcing her to abandon the rescue and
escape. The explanation of this incident was that the
Vanilla was suspected to have witnessed the laying of the
mines, and for this reason the enemy was determined
that none of her crew should live to tell the tale. From
quarters far and near the enemy's activities in mine-
laying were continually being reported. On April 26th
the British fishing trawler Recolo foundered on a mine
south of the Dogger Bank.
In preparation for an intended bombardment of the
Belgian coast from the sea, four Grimsby paddle-steamers
were sent to sweep from April 26th to 28th, and on their
way back across the North Sea they commenced a sweep
four cables wide in an area where the Sutterton had found
a mine in her trawl a few days before: Whilst the Sagitta
and Westward Ho ! were turning south, a mine exploded
in their sweep. A few minutes later another mine rose
to the surface in the same sweep. It was very desirable
that a specimen of these mines should be salved for
examination by British naval experts. The commanding
officer of the Sagitta was Lieutenant- Commander W. H. S.
Garnett, R.N.R., a Cambridge wrangler and an enthu-
siastic yachtsman, who had volunteered and received a
CH. ix] AN OFFICER'S PLUCKY ACT 403
commission at the beginning of the war. This gallant
officer, disregarding the peril, went overboard, swam to
the mine, and dexterously cut the electric wires about
it, after which it was hoisted inboard without further
incident. For this plucky act the Admiralty sent him an
expression of appreciation. It is to be regretted that
some months later Lieutenant- Commander Garnett, having
in the meantime transferred to the Royal Flying Corps,
met his death in a flying accident.
From the condition of the paint on these Swarte mines,
it was evident that they had been laid quite recently.
Meanwhile the Tory Island mine-field was being swept up ;
seven more mines had been destroyed by the Lough
Swilly sweepers, and altogether forty-five mines had
been accounted for in the mine-field, seventy- one others
having drifted away and been destroyed on the Irish and
Scottish coasts. On April 23rd still another ship had
blundered into the field, hit a mine, and foundered. This
was the Norwegian s.s. Caprivi, which was sixteen miles
north- north- east of Tory Island at the time, just a mile
to westward of where the sweeping was going on. Although
the eastern part of the area had been pretty well cleared,
yet many mines still remained, and prolonged spells of
bad weather did not lessen the difficulties of the task.
In the meantime, enemy submarines were engaged upon
many daring enterprises, in spite of the persistency of the
patrols. They were seen south of the Goodwins and near
the Lizard ; a ship was torpedoed off the Start, in a strong
south-west wind and rough sea. They were operating
successfully off the French coast, and in mid- Channel,
and a ship was chased twenty miles south of the Eddystone.
Other merchant ships were sunk south of St. Catherine's,
off the Wolf Rock, and off Beachy Head. Submarines
were reported in the Irish Sea, off the entrance to the
Bristol Channel, and off the Owers. A cork life-jacket
picked up at Trevose Head, Padstow, marked U21, with
an impression of the Iron Cross, and a torpedo picked
up off Farn by a steamer and marked U22, showed where
the enemy had been. Off Hartlepool two trawlers sighted
U16 on the surface about the middle of April ; another
trawler sighted a submarine east of Aberdeen ; an armed
yacht attacked still another near May Island ; the New-
haven Patrol vessels had chased yet another off Beachy
404 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
Head ; and a Falmouth drifter pursued one for two
hours, a torpedo being fired at her which passed under her
forefoot. On the same day a trawler reported having
seen and run over a submarine off Land's End. It was
even reported, with some show of credibility, that two
German officers had come ashore in a collapsible boat
and landed at Cairn Ryan, near Stranraer. Ships were
being attacked or sunk near the North Hinder and other
parts of the North Sea. Auxiliary Patrol vessels were in
action with submarines off Fair Island and Anvil Point ;
and off St. Abb's Head the trawler Ben Lawers fired forty
rounds at an enemy craft and claimed to have hit her.
Dense black smoke was observed, and the submarine,
apparently damaged, made off, being chased by the
trawler until lost to sight. She was unable to dive, and
only her fast surface speed saved her. At the end of April
the enemy sank a couple of ships off the west coast of
Ireland, near the Blaskets, supplying further evidence of
the radius of action of these craft. The Auxiliary Patrol
in these embarrassing conditions had to maintain its
operations with vigilance and alertness. Surprise followed
surprise, but it was never long before each new develop-
ment was countered by fresh strategy, novel tactics, or
improved weapons. Scarcely had the patrols become
accustomed to mine and submarine warfare than they
had to prepare for offence and defence against aeroplanes
and Zeppelins. Harwich and Lowestoft trawlers, in con-
sequence of repeated flights of Zeppelins over Lowestoft
and the neighbourhood of Orfordness, were fitted with
anti-aircraft guns. By night and by day, below the sur-
face and on the surface, there was little rest for the already
overworked patrol craft, and to their routine duties was
added, this month of April 1915, and in the first days of
May, that of protecting the lines of communication when
the 10th Division of the British Army crossed the Irish
Sea from Kingstown to Holyhead. The whole of this
route was carefully patrolled by auxiliary ships in the
following manner :
At intervals a chain of trawlers was placed just outside
Kingstown, past the Kish Lightship right across until
near Holyhead. In addition, five steam-yachts guarded
the route, while a division of drifters, with their indicator
nets, were stationed to the west of the South Stack (at the
CH. ix] TROOPS SAFELY TRANSPORTED 405
approach to Holyhead) and off the Codling Bank, to the
southward of the Kish. Actually no transport was tor-
pedoed, but on the day when the last of the troops crossed,
a submarine was seen by the trawler Garu three miles
west-north-west of the South Stack, that is close to the
route of passenger ships. The trawler gave chase, but
the enemy dived.
That these troops were moved without the loss of a
single life furnished further proof of the increasing
efficiency of the patrols and of the respect in which these
craft were held by the enemy. The keenness exhibited
by the crews was all the more notable in view of the
exacting conditions of service which war imposed upon
them, in association with many days on end unvaried by
any incident to relieve the creeping feeling of boredom.
But the imagination of these fishermen had been stirred
by events at sea since the opening of hostilities, and they
did not fail to realise the possibilities of disaster associated
with the passage of this division of the British Army,
whose safe crossing from Ireland to England constituted
a further conspicuous success to the credit of this impro-
vised force which had already shown its value as an
extension of the long arm of the British Fleet. From the
outbreak of war down to the end of April 1915, twenty- seven
trawlers and three drifters of the great fleet of auxiliary
craft engaged in fighting the enemy had become total
losses. Having regard to the risks of mine- sweeping in
dangerous areas, attacks by submarines, and losses inci-
dental to navigation during winter months off unlighted
coasts, the Auxiliary Patrol had been fortunate in suffering
so lightly. The immunity which the vast majority of
these vessels had experienced was due not to any want of
daring and resource on the part of the enemy, but to the
seamanship, courage, and adaptability which the officers
and men of these British auxiliary craft had exhibited in
conditions of uninterrupted danger and difficulty.
With the passing of the long nights of the winter of
1914-15 and an improvement in weather conditions at
sea, it was expected that the enemy would redouble his
attack upon sea-borne commerce. The construction of
better types of submarines and the manufacture of thou-
sands of additional mines had kept the German shipyards
and engineering shops busy since the outbreak of war.
406 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
Simultaneously the strength of the British patrols had
increased as fast as ships, guns, and men were available.
In the summer of 1915 a new type of British mine — the
" Cruiser " mine, which was the direct ancestor of the
depth-charge — was being distributed among trawlers and
drifters, the idea being that, when circumstances were
favourable, it should be dropped upon submarines from
shoots specially fitted for the purpose. In the North
Channel a dozen sections of net drifters were denying the
passage to the enemy, each section consisting of ten or
eleven drifters, commanded by a sub- lieutenant Royal
Naval Reserve, whose ship was armed with a gun, a bomb,
a mine, and, later, with the depth-charge ; so that the
chances of escape of any submarine which found itself
entangled in the nets became fewer.
The whole organisation was improving and increasing.
At the end of the first nine months of war there were
either at their stations or fitting-out 63 armed yachts
and 524 trawlers and drifters ; arrangements were in hand
to increase the number to 83 and 631 respectively. Apart
from these, about 350 trawlers and drifters were employed
in mine- sweeping and watching the cleared channels, the
auxiliary craft were co-operating in the Dardanelles opera-
tions, and there were the motor-boats.
At Dover Rear-Admiral Hood had been succeeded by
Rear-Admiral R. H. S. Bacon, D.S.O.,1 who had disposed
his drifters in a four- sided area in the Straits where
submarines were very likely to be caught. The limits
of this area were :
(a) Lat. 51° 3' 10", long. 1° 19' 0" E.
(b) Lat. 51° 8' 50", long. 1° 29' 10" E.
(c) Lat. 51° 5' 20", long. 1° 51' 30" E.
(d) Lat. 50° 54' 30", long. 1° 31' 20" E.
The Scarborough area, after being most carefully swept,
was by the end of April declared free of mines. The clear-
ing-up had been a long and arduous task, but it was a satis-
faction to know that the passage of this Yorkshire coast
was at length freed from the mine peril. Almost simul-
taneously with the elimination of this mine-field it became
known that another had been laid in the Swarte area, the
beginning of which has already been noticed. It was
i Afterwards Admiral Sir Reginald H. Bacon, K.C.B., D.S.O.
CH. ix] SWEEPING THE SWARTE MINE-FIELD 407
discovered, as has been stated, by the trawler Sutterton.
Apparently the enemy had assumed that this channel
was being used by vessels of the Grand Fleet, or at least
of Commodore Tyrwhitt's Harwich force, as a short-cut
when bound north. Possibly the new mine-field was laid
with the intention of another raid, or the design was to
entice out the capital ships and thus cause losses. It was
significant that the mines were found at a greater depth
than was usual, allowing merchant ships — mostly neutral
—which were accustomed to pass along this route in
considerable numbers, to steam over them in safety.
Obviously it was desirable, from the enemy's point of view,
that nothing should happen which would cause the new
mine-field to be prematurely revealed. The chance dis-
covery by the Sutterton of a mine in her trawl disclosed
the enemy's plan, and was the means of saving lives and
ships, although not before two British fishing craft had
foundered in the field. On May 3rd the trawler Uxbridge
caught a mine in her trawl and the explosion destroyed
the ship. Three days later, very near to the same position,
the trawler Don shared a like fate.
On the Swarte mine -field being reported, large numbers
of the auxiliary craft were sent out to ascertain its boun-
daries, and meantime merchant traffic between Britain
and Holland was suspended. The northern limit was
found to be somewhere south of lat. 53° 32', and the
eastern limit to be long. 2° 40' E. Mines were destroyed
in plenty. The effect of the enemy's activity was to dis-
arrange the routine work in the swept channel on which
the coastwise traffic was dependent. The menace of the
Swarte area was met with imagination and insight, and it
soon became known that the lines of mines had been laid
in an easterly direction from a position in lat. 53° 26',
long. 2° 25' E. By the end of the first week in May most
of the mines for the first seventeen miles had been destroyed,
the only other casualty being the loss of the fishing-trawler
Hellenic, which had blown up with a mine in her trawl. The
mines were observed to be newly painted, and of a type
hitherto unknown. The line extended for about thirty
miles.
Other areas at the same time required constant attention.
The Northern Dogger Bank area was examined and
found to be clear ; but there was a very large area under
408 GROWTH OF THE SUBMARINE MENACE [CH. ix
suspicion right in the middle of the North Sea, bounded
by lat. 54° 40' and 56°, and long. 2° 30' E. and 5° E., and
covering a space of 6,000 square miles. ' From this it
may be seen with what thoroughness and sound strategy
the enemy had laid his mines. Lines joining the points
given bring out a four- sided area embracing that through
which the Grand Fleet must have passed in making a
sweep towards Heligoland down the North Sea. Had the
High Sea Fleet come out as far as the southern boundary
of this area, refused action, and then run back home, the
mine-field, it was calculated, would have caused heavy
losses to the Grand Fleet engaged in the pursuit.
Large numbers of mines were found. In addition to
forty- one mines which quite early had been swept up and
exploded, the trawler Reverto on May 18th fished up a
newly-painted mine in her trawl. The gear was cut
away and the mine sank without exploding. Two days
later the s.s. Maricopa struck a mine in the field, but
did not sink. The Sagitta and her group of trawlers pro-
ceeded to sweep from close to where the Maricopa had
struck, and promptly destroyed forty- three mines. This
was on May 23rd. Next day ten more mines were
accounted for. Two were actually brought into port
by the Sagitta, having been found floating, only just
awash and nearly full of water. They had been set to a
depth of 5*4 metres. Mine-sweeping gunboats, which
also were engaged in the search, destroyed a number of
mines. Once more the new Navy was in the happy posi-
tion of having saved the old from possible disaster. For
some days the Sagitta and her paddlers continued to search
the field, escorted by destroyers and supported by light
cruisers, the destroyers being of great service in examining
and warning passing vessels. By the end of May eighty-
six mines had been swept up between lat. 54° 40', lat.
55° 20', and long. 3° E. to 3° 20' E. The lines of mines
had been laid just inside the 20- fathom line, with a very
pronounced tongue running diagonally across the great
area throughout its whole breadth.
The Lough Swilly sweepers proceeded to clear the area
west of Tory Island before continuing to sweep the northern
part, in order to ensure a passage across the field on an
east and west course passing within thirteen miles of the
island. This work was desirable, it being seven months
CH. ix] FISHING- VESSELS DESTROYED 409
since this field had been laid ; several ships had foundered
upon it, and the mine-field was placed in a most important
position. Bad weather during the winter months had
interrupted operations.
Simultaneously with more intensified mine-laying, the
enemy's submarine activities became more pronounced.
During May submarines sank fishing-vessels in the North
Sea, and merchant ships in areas as widely scattered as
the North Sea, off the Scillies, the south of Ireland, the
Irish Sea, Bristol Channel, and the western end of the
English Channel. Six fishing-vessels were sunk on
May 2nd off Aberdeen and May Island ; eight more the
next day off the Dogger Bank and east Scottish coast, all
by submarines. Between May 13th and May 18th four
more trawlers met the same fate near the north-west
corner of the Dogger Bank, the crews being taken
prisoners. Altogether there were no fewer than twenty-
two fishing-vessels destroyed in the North Sea in the
month of May.
CHAPTER X
THE SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA "
THE month of April 1915 had proved an unsatisfactory
month for the enemy ; only seventeen merchant ships
had been attacked, and of these six had escaped. It
must have been apparent to the German authorities that
neither the threats nor the acts in which they had indulged
had produced the desired effect on British merchant
seamen. Hitherto the farthest the declared policy of
Germany had gone was the announcement that, " on and
after February 18th, 1915, every enemy merchant ship
found in the said War Zone will be destroyed without it
being always possible to avoid the dangers threatening
the crews and passengers on that account." The sug-
gestion was that loss of life would be due to accidental
causes, and would not be deliberately pursued as a feature
of German submarine policy. But towards the end of
April a demonstration of " frightfulness," exceeding any-
thing hitherto recorded, was determined upon, and on
May 7th the great Cunard liner Lusitania was sunk
without warning by U20, commanded by Kapitan-
Leutnant Schwieger, resulting in the loss of 1,198 lives.
During the six preceding days the enemy had destroyed six
ships, of which three went down on the 6th. In only one
case did loss of life result, two of the crew of the Minterne
(3,018 tons) being drowned on the 3rd of the month.
There was evidence, however, that enemy submarines
were working off the Irish coast, for the s.v. Earl of Lathom
(132 tons) was sunk eight miles south by west from Old
Head of Kinsale, where, two days later, was enacted the
greatest maritime crime in history, revealing the full
significance of Germany's new policy. It would scarcely
be an exaggeration to say that no single event of the whole
war, whether by sea, by land, or in the air, produced
410
CH. x] DETAILS OF THE GREAT LINER 411
such an instant universal and ineffaceable impression,
or was more pregnant in its moral and ultimate political
significance, since it was probably the determining factor
in America's decision to intervene on the side of the
Entente Powers, although this event did not actually
take effect for another two years.
Several factors combined to make the sinking of the
Lusitania the touchstone, as it were, of civilisation's
judgment, and to confer upon the event a tragic repre-
sentative value in respect of Germany's whole assault
upon merchant shipping. One of the largest, swiftest,
and most lavishly equipped vessels afloat, the Lusitania
at the time of her sinking was only eight years old. Built
by Messrs. John Brown & Co., Ltd., of Clydebank, in
1907, she was a vessel of 30,393 gross tonnage. She was
785 feet in length, 88 feet in breadth, 60 feet 4j inches
in depth, and with a load draught of 36 feet, her displace-
ment being 41,440 tons. She had nine decks, including
the hold, and accommodation for 550 first-class, 500 second-
class, and 1,300 third-class passengers. The crew num-
bered 750 in normal conditions, and with all berths filled
the Lusitania could therefore carry a population of no
fewer than 3,100 persons. Built to attain a speed of
25 knots, she was driven by six Parsons turbines, four
ahead and two astern, the former being capable of
developing 68,000 indicated horse-power. The twenty-
five boilers, twenty-three of them double-ended, were
fitted with eight furnaces apiece, the boilers being divided
into four groups, and each stokehold having its uptake with
a funnel. The four funnels rose to a height of 184 feet
above the keel, their diameter being 24 feet. The navi-
gating bridge stood 110 feet above the keel, while the
masts were 210 feet high. The initial cost of this great
vessel was estimated at £1,250,000, and insurance, main-
tenance, depreciation and other charges amounted to
£30,000 per month. As a moderate estimate, the cost of
running the Lusitania on a voyage to New York and back,
including wages, victualling, and coal supplies, was about
£20,000, and an agreement with the British Government
stipulated that at least three-quarters of the crew must
be British subjects. With her sister-ship, the Mauretania,
she had been built at the suggestion of the British Govern-
ment at a time when the North-German and Hamburg-
412 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
American liners were making a strong bid for the com-
mercial mastery of the Atlantic ; and though she was not,
in the acutal event, employed on war service, she had
been definitely subsidised as a reserve merchant cruiser,
the Government having placed at the disposal of the Cu-
nard Company, at a moderate rate of interest, the sum of
£2,600,000 for her construction and that of the Mauretania.
The Lusitania stood, therefore, for somewhat more than
a merely up-to-date Atlantic liner, in that by her means
the British Mercantile Marine had regained what was
known at the time as the " blue ribbon " of the Atlantic.
Though little heed was paid to the matter either by the
general public or even by responsible persons, rumours
had been very widely spread in New York that the Lusi-
tania was to be attacked, and indeed an advertisement
had appeared in several American newspapers on May 1st
in the following terms :
" NOTICE. — Travellers intending to embark on Atlantic
voyages are reminded that the state of war exists between
Germany and her Allies and Great Britain and her Allies ;
that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the
British Isles ; that in accordance with formal notice given
by the Imperial German Government vessels flying the
flag of Great Britain or of any of her Allies are liable to
destruction in those waters; and that travellers sailing
in the war zone in ships of Great Britain or her Allies
do so at their own risk. — Imperial German Embassy,
Washington, B.C., April, 22nd, 1915."
No direct warning was given either to the Cunard
Company or to the captain of the Lusitania. Judge
Mayer, of the Federal District Court of New York, was
subsequently called upon to investigate the circumstances
of the sailing of the Lusitania, a petition having been
lodged by the Cunard Steamship Company, Ltd., for
limitation of liability. In the course of his judgment on
August 24th, 1918, Judge Mayer stated that " the captain
was fully justified in sailing on the appointed day from
a neutral port with many neutral and non-combatant
passengers, unless he and his company were willing to
yield to the attempt of the German Government to terrify
British shipping. No one familiar with the British char-
CH. x] GERMANY'S FALSE CHARGES 413
acter would expect that such a threat would accomplish
more than to emphasise the necessity of taking every
precaution to protect life and property which the exercise
of judgment would invite. And so the Lusitania sailed
undisguised, with her four funnels, and a figure so familiar
as to be readily discernible not only by naval officers
and mariners, but by the ocean-going public generally."
Few intending passengers of any nationality believed
that such a threat as had been made by the Germans
could be meant seriously or would ever be carried out.
When the Lusitania sailed, it was with a total of 1,959
people on board, including 440 women and children. The
crew on this voyage numbered 702 instead of 750.
With regard to the cargo, this was a general one of
the usual kind, but, as was entered on the ship's manifest,
a certain number of cartridges were carried. These were
stowed well forward in the ship on the orlop and lower
decks and about fifty yards away from where the torpedo
struck the vessel. There was no other explosive on
board.
It was afterwards alleged by the German Government
that the Lusitania was equipped with guns, trained gunners,
and special ammunition, that she was transporting Cana-
dian troops, and that she was violating the laws of the
United States. The investigation subsequently held by
Lord Mersey proved that all these statements were untrue.
The Lusitania, in fact, carried neither guns nor gunners, and
no troops, and in no wise violated the laws of the United
States. In response to the suggestion of the German
Government, the United States in a subsequent note
stated :
" Fortunately these are matters concerning which the
Government of the United States is in a position to give
the Imperial German Government official information.
Of the facts alleged in Your Excellency's Note, if true,
the Government of the United States would have been
bound to take official cognizance. Performing its recog-
nised duty as a neutral Power and enforcing its national
laws, it was its duty to see to it that the Lusitania was not
armed for offensive action, that she was not serving as a
transport, that she did not carry cargo prohibited by the
statutes of the United States, and that if, in fact, she was
414 SINKING OF THE "LUSITANIA" [CH. x
a naval vessel of Great Britain, she should not receive
a clearance as a merchantman. It performed that duty.
It enforced its statutes with scrupulous vigilance through
its regularly constituted officials, and it is able there-
fore to assure the Imperial German Government that it
has been misinformed. If the Imperial German Govern-
ment should deem itself to be in possession of convincing
evidence that the officials of the Government of the United
States did not perform these duties with thoroughness,
the Government of the United States sincerely hopes
that it will submit that evidence for consideration.
Whatever may be the contentions of the Imperial German
Government regarding the carriage of contraband of war
on board the Lusitania or regarding the explosion of that
material by a torpedo, it need only be said that in the
view of this Government these contentions are irrelevant
to the question of the legality of the methods used by the
German naval authorities in sinking the vessel."
Judge Mayer, of the Federal District Court of New
York, referring to this allegation by the Germans, declared
that the Lusitania did carry some eighteen fuse cases and
125 shrapnel cases consisting merely of empty shells
without any powder charges, 4,200 cases of safety cart-
ridges, and 189 cases of infantry equipment, such as leather
fittings, pouches, and the like. All these were for delivery
abroad, but none of these munitions could be exploded
by setting them on fire in mass or in bulk, nor by sub-
jecting them to impact. He learnt in evidence that the
ship " had been duly inspected on March 17th, April 15th,
16th, and 17th, all in 1915, and before she left New York
the boat gear and boats were examined, overhauled,
checked up, and defective articles properly replaced."
The great liner set out from New York on May 1st, under
the command of Captain W. T. Turner, an old and trusted
servant of the Cunard Company. The voyage across the
Atlantic was uneventful, and was accompanied by smooth
seas and fine weather. The name of the ship and port of
registry were painted out in accordance with Admiralty
advice to merchant shipping generally; no flag, not
even the house flag, was flown. An average speed of
about 21 knots was maintained throughout the Atlantic
crossing. This was lower than the usual pre-war speed
CH. x] ADMIRALTY NOTICES TO MASTERS 415
of the Lusitania, for reasons that were made clear by Mr.
(afterwards Sir) Alfred Allen Booth, Chairman of the
Cunard Company, in his evidence before Lord Mersey's
Commission, on June 16th, 1915. From this it appeared
that, after the rush of homeward-bound American traffic
was over, towards the end of October 1914, it had become
a serious question as to whether or not the Cunard Company
could continue to run their two large steamers, the Lusi-
tania and the Mauretania. Having gone into the matter
very carefully, the directors came to the conclusion that
it would be possible to continue running one of these vessels
at a reduced speed, once a month, paying expenses, but
without the hope of making a profit. They decided,
therefore, to run the Lusitania with eighteen boilers out
of the total of twenty-four, reducing the speed from 24
to 21 knots, this reduction, however, still leaving the
Lusitania considerably the fastest steamer in the Atlantic
trade.
In common with other masters, Captain Turner was,
of course, familiar with the various Admiralty Notices
to responsible officers of the Mercantile Marine that were
periodically issued for purposes of advice. Dealing gener-
ally with such matters as that of the number of lights
to be shown, precautions as to lifeboats, and various other
matters, these Admiralty Notices embodied the growing
experience of those who were responsible for studying
and combating the German methods of submarine war-
fare. In view, however, of what happened, and of certain
criticisms to which the master of the Lusitania was after-
wards subjected, one such notice is particularly important.
On March 22nd a warning had been issued from the
Admiralty in the following terms : " Warn homeward-
bound British merchant ships that when making principal
landfalls at night they should not approach nearer than is
absolutely necessary for safe navigation. Most important
that vessels passing up the Irish or English Channel should
keep mid-channel course. War experience has shown that
fast steamers can considerably reduce the chance of a suc-
cessful surprise submarine attack by zigzagging — that is
to say, altering course at short and irregular intervals,
say ten minutes to half an hour. This course is almost
invariably adopted by warships when cruising in an area
known to be infested by submarines. The under- wlater
28
416 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
speed of a submarine is very low, and it is exceedingly
difficult for her to get into position to deliver an attack
unless she can observe and predict the course of the ship
attacked. It is believed that the regulations of many
steamship lines prescribe that the master shall be on deck
whenever course is altered. It is for the consideration of
owners whether, in the present circumstances, some re-
laxation of rules of this character is not advisable in the
case of fast ships, in order to admit zigzagging being carried
out without throwing an undue strain upon the master."
At the same time it has to be borne in mind that these
notifications were in the nature of general advice rather
than imperative orders, and were not intended to cramp
the initiative of responsible masters.
By May 6th the Lusitania was approaching dangerous
waters, and at 5.30 a.m. on that day all the lifeboats
under davits were swung out. All bulk-head doors were
subsequently closed, except such as were required to
be kept open in order to work the ship. Scuttles were
closed. The lookout on the ship was doubled, two men
being sent to the crow's-nest and two men to the " eyes " of
the ship. Two officers were always on the bridge, and a
quartermaster on either side, with instructions to watch
for submarines. That these were indeed to be feared
became clear just before 8 o'clock on the evening of that
day, the Admiral commanding at Queenstown having
signalled to the Lusitania that submarines were active
off the south coast of Ireland, and had been reported
four miles to the south-west of Copper Point, near Castle-
haven. A little later on the same night a second wireless
message was received by the Lusitania in the following
terms : " Take Liverpool pilot at Bar and avoid headlands.
Pass harbours at full speed, steer mid-channel course ;
submarines at Fastnet."
From lat. 40° 10' N. and long. 49° W., the Lusitania
was navigated on a great circle in the direction of Fastnet,
and upon a course that, when approaching Ireland, would
take her some twenty miles distant from this point. At
8 a.m. on May 7th, for reasons that will be referred to later,
her speed was reduced to 18 knots ; and shortly after
this, owing to the presence of fog, her speed was further
reduced for awhile to 15 knots. About 11 o'clock the
fog began to clear, and speed was again increased to 18
CH. x] THE " LUSITANIA'S " COURSE 417
knots. At 11.30 an Admiralty wireless message was re-
ceived from Valentia : " Submarines active in the south
part of Irish Channel and last heard of twenty miles south
of Coningbeg." The Lusitania was then on a course
S. 87 E. magnetic, and land was sighted at about 12.10 p.m.,
two points abaft the beam, and about twenty-six miles
distant. Although the weather was clear, Fastnet, owing
to the distance, had not been sighted, and the land seen
was believed, and probably rightly so, to be Brow Head,
the next headland after Mizen Head. The sea was
smooth, there was a light breeze, and this course of
S. 87 E. was maintained until 12.40 p.m., when Galley
Head was sighted, a long distance away, on the port
bow. Owing to the fact that submarines had been re-
ported twenty miles south of Coningbeg, and thus about
midway between the Tuskar and the Smalls, the channel
up which the Lusitania must pass on her way to Liverpool,
Captain Turner had now decided, when he had assured
himself of the exact position of his vessel, to steer a course
that would bring him past Coningbeg, some half a mile
south of the lightship, thus giving as wide a berth as possible
to the enemy submarines of whose presence he had been
notified. At 12.40 p.m., therefore, and in order to fix
his position as exactly as possible, he gradually altered
course thirty degrees more to the northward to N. 63 E.
magnetic. Shortly before 1 p.m. he received another
wireless Admiralty message to the effect that sub-
marines had been sighted off Cape Clear, near Fastnet,
at 10 a.m., when they were heading for the westward.
This point was, of course, now behind him ; he was pro-
ceeding himself in an opposite direction ; and he therefore
concluded that at any rate he had escaped these particular
submarines. At 1.40 p.m. the Old Head of Kinsale was
in sight on the port bow, about ten miles distant, and
Captain Turner then altered his course back to S. 87 E.,
intending to take a four-point bearing off the Old Head of
Kinsale before altering his course to the Coningbeg light-
vessel, which he had resolved, as has been indicated, to
leave about half a mile on his port hand. The twelve to
four watch was that of the Lusitania 's first officer, Mr.
Arthur Rowland Jones, who was relieved at 1.40 p.m.,
the second officer, Mr. Hefford, who was unfortunately
drowned, and the junior third officer, Mr. Albert Arthur
418 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
Bestic, being on the bridge. The latter, who was engaged
in taking the four-point bearing, was relieved at 2 p.m.
by another officer, Mr. Stephens, also afterwards drowned,
and it was while the four-point bearing was still being
taken, approximately at a quarter-past two, that the
ship was torpedoed.
The first torpedo struck the ship on the starboard side,
somewhere between the third and fourth funnels, breaking,
as it did so, one of the lifeboats to pieces. The second
torpedo struck the ship almost immediately afterwards,
apparently about 100 feet aft of the first.1 Both torpedoes
exploded with terrible effect, the engine-rooms being almost
immediately flooded, thus making it impossible to take
way off the ship, and thereby considerably adding to the
great difficulties of launching the lifeboats. This was
further increased by the listing of the ship to the starboard
side, thus causing all the port side lifeboats to swing in-
board, and those on the starboard side to swing outwards
to distances that made it very difficult for passengers to
be placed in them. Wireless messages for help were at
once dispatched, received, and answered, but no vessel
of any sort, as it happened, was near the scene of the dis-
aster, and within twenty minutes the great liner had dis-
appeared beneath the waves.
One of the most graphic narratives of the course of
events was that of Mr. James Brooks, of Bridgeport,
Connecticut, an American business man, who was a saloon
passenger, and who described his experiences as follows :
" None of my fellow-passengers," said Mr. Brooks, " re-
garded a submarine attack as a serious possibility, and we
had a very comfortable voyage, favoured by pleasant
1 We have a German denial of the fact that a second torpedo was fired.
In a publication entitled "Die deutschen U-Boote in ihrer Kriegsfiihrung,
1914-18," by Kapitan-Leutnant A, Gayer, it is stated: " On May 7th,
between 2 and 3 p.m., Schwieger sighted in fine clear weather on the south
coast of Ireland, near the Old Head of Kinsale, so many masts and funnels
that he thought at first he had before him a first-rate destroyer flotilla
proceeding in line ahead." But it soon appeared that " all belonged to one
steamer only." But the commander was not able to make sure that it was
the Luaitania before the shot had already hit. Although the sinking of the
ship was doubtful at first, Schwieger did not allow the second torpedo,
which was all ready, to be fired, as he saw that there were an immense crowd
of passengers to be saved. As though he had a foreboding of the tragedy
which lay in his success, he went with his boat to a depth of twenty metres,
" moved by mixed feelings."
CH. xj A PASSENGER'S NARRATIVE 419
weather. A good many passengers were still at lunch
when, on Friday afternoon, the attack came in reality.
I had just finished a run on deck, and had reached the
Marconi deck, when I glanced out over the water. It
was perfectly smooth. My eyes alighted on a white
streak making its way with lightning-like rapidity towards
the ship. I was so high, in that position, above the surface
of the water that I could make out the outline of the
torpedo. It appeared to be about twelve feet long, and
came along possibly three feet below the surface, its sides
white with bubbles of foam. I watched its passage,
fascinated, until it passed out of sight behind the bridge,
and in another moment came the explosion. The ship,
recoiling under the force of the blow, was jarred and lifted,
as if it had struck an immovable object. A column of
water shot up to the bridge deck, carrying with it a lot
of debris, and, despite the fact that I must have been
twenty yards from the spot at which the torpedo struck,
I was knocked off my feet. Before I could recover my-
self, the iron forepart of the ship was enveloped in a blind-
ing cloud of steam, due, not, I think, to the explosion of
a second torpedo, as some thought, but to the fact that the
two forehold boilers had been jammed close together
and ' jack-knifed ' upwards. This I was told by a stoker
afterwards. We had been in sight of land for some time,
and the head of the ship, which had already begun to
settle, was turned towards the Old Head of Kinsale. All
the boats on the ship had been swung out the day previous,
and the work of launching them was at once commenced.
The attempt in the case of the first boat was a tragic failure.
The women and children were taken first, and the boat
was practically filled with them, there being only a few
men. The boat was lowered until within its own length
of the water, when the forward tackle jammed, and the
whole of its occupants, with the exception of three, were
thrown into the water. The Lusitania was then on an
even keel. On the decks of the doomed vessel absolute
coolness prevailed. There was no rushing about, and
nothing remotely resembling a panic. In just a few
isolated cases there were signs of hysteria on the part of
the women, but that was all."
Captain Anderson, the second-in-command, who was lost,
420 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
and whose body was afterwards recovered, appeared on
the bridge deck as soon as he could reach it, and informed
the saloon passengers that there was no immediate danger,
for everyone was confident that the ship would remain
afloat, in spite of the damage received. Everybody had, of
course, rushed on deck, and this statement was reassuring.
" Meanwhile," said Mr. Brooks, " the ship had taken a
decided list, and was sinking rapidly by the head. The
efforts made to lower the boats had apparently not met
with much success. Those on the port side had swung
inboard and could not be used, while the collapsible
boats, which were lashed beneath them, could not be got
at. The ladies were standing quite coolly, waiting on board
to enter the boats, when they could be released by the men
from the davits. The davits, by this time, were them-
selves touching the water, the ship having sunk so low that
the bridge deck was only four feet or so from the surface
of the sea. Losing no time, the men passed the women
rapidly into the boats, and places had been found by now
for all the people about the midship section. I stepped
into one of the lifeboats and attempted to assist in getting
it clear. I saw the list was so great that the davits pinched
the gear, rendering it improbable that they could be got
away when the ship went down, so I stepped on to the gun-
wale and dived into the water. I had no lifebelt and am
not a good swimmer, but I decided to take the risk. I
had been wetted right through when the explosion oc-
curred, and I believe that, had I gone in dry, I should
have swallowed so much water that I should not have
lasted long. I swam as hard as I could away from the
vessel, and noticed with feelings of apprehension the men-
acing bulk of the huge funnels as they loomed up over
my head. I expected them momentarily to fall on me
and crush me as I swam, but at last I judged myself to be
clear, and I turned around and trod the water in order
to watch the great hull heel over. The monster took a
sudden plunge, and, noting the crowd still on her decks,
and the heavily-laden boats filling with helpless women
and children yet glued to her side, I sickened with horror
at the sight. The liner's stern rose high out of the water ;
there was a thunderous roar as of the collapse of a great
building during a fire ; and then jshe disappeared, drag-
CH. x] THE FIRST RESCUES 421
ging hundreds of fellow-creatures into the water. Many
never rose again to the surface, but the sea rapidly grew
black with the figures of struggling men, women, and
children. The wireless installation came over with a crash
into the sea. It struck my uplifted arm as it fell, and I
felt it pass over my body as it sank, almost dragging me
under.
" The rush of water over the steamer's decks swept away
a collapsible boat, and I swam towards it. Another man
reached it shortly after, and, after we were rescued, I
found him to be Mr. Charles E. Lauriat junior, of Boston.
Two seamen also managed to swim to the boat and to
climb on it. One had a knife, and the other asked me
for mine, and together they set about cutting away the
canvas cover of the boat. When they had finished, I
climbed inside, and the two of them followed me. We
started to rescue the unfortunate people in the water,
or at least those of them who were still living. We quickly
had about thirty of them in the little craft. Around us
in the water were scores of boats. There were no oars
in our boat. We managed to raise the sides of the boat
as they should be raised when the boat is in use, and we
collected five oars from the mass of floating timber in the
water. Then we started to row towards the lighthouse,
which we could see in the distance. At the time the liner
was torpedoed there was absolutely no ship of any kind
in sight, with the exception of a trawler, the Peel 12, of
Glasgow. She was close inshore under the lighthouse,
and, owing to the lightness of the wind, she was of no use
so far as the rescue of persons actually in the sea was con-
cerned. She came along as fast as she could, however, and
was able to pick up about 110 persons from lifeboats and
life-rafts. Her limited capacity was pushed to the utmost,
and I even had to sit with one leg hanging over the side
because there was no room to put it on the inside. We took
in tow a lifeboat and a raft, which were also filled to the
gunwale, and, when the occupants were able to be taken
out, they were cast off. The auxiliary boat Indian Prince
had arrived by that time from Queenstown. The Peel 12
was the first boat on the scene, and she was followed by
a tramp Greek steamer, which came up from the west,
and was able to pick up several lifeboats which had got
away."
422 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
From this account given by an American, and then
neutral, eyewitness, it is clear that there was neither
any warning from the submarine nor any opportunity
afforded either to the passengers or crew of the Lusitania
to secure their personal safety before the ship was sunk ;
and these facts were further confirmed at the official
investigation by Lord Mersey in the following June.
Material witnesses to this, apart from Captain Turner,
who was on the bridge at the time, were, of course, the
seamen on the lookout, all of whom acted with admirable
courage and promptitude, and of whom one especially,
Leslie N. Morton, an able seaman, only eighteen years of
age, was singled out in the Commissioner's Report for the
highest commendation.
Morton, whose first voyage it was on the Lusitania —
he had previously been an apprentice for four years on
the sailing-ship J. B. Walmsley — was an extra lookout
on the forecastle head, starboard side, during the two to
four watch, and seems to have been the first person actually
to observe the approach of the two torpedoes. This
began, as he described it, with a " big burst of foam about
500 yards away." This was followed by a " thin streak
of foam," as he said, " making for the ship at a rapid
speed," followed by another, " going parallel with the first
one and a little behind it." Having reported this to the
bridge with a megaphone, Morton then made for the fore-
castle to go down below to call his brother, who was asleep
at the time ; and on the way there he saw what appeared
to him to be the conning-tower of the submarine just
submerging.
Having called his brother, Morton returned to the deck
to give assistance in lowering the boats and rescuing the
passengers. Having helped to fill No. 11 boat, he then
went to another boat, into which he scrambled, after
passengers had taken their places, and which he endeavoured
to launch. Unfortunately, owing to the well-mtentioned
but ill-directed efforts of some of the passengers, this boat
was capsized, and, just before she turned over, Morton,
in his own words, " swam for it." After swimming for
some little time, he saw an empty collapsible boat, and,
with a sailor named Parry, he climbed into it. Having
done so, he ripped part of the cover off, and picked up
about fifty persons. With these on board, he then made
CH. x] FIRST OFFICER'S SPLENDID WORK 423
for a fishing-ketch, about five miles away, which he suc-
cessfully reached, and in which he placed his passengers.
He then dropped astern from this smack, and took another
twenty or thirty people from a lifeboat that was sinking,
Parry and himself and his second boat-load of passengers
being then picked up by a mine-sweeper which had arrived
on the scene as the result of the wireless messages. In
all, these two boys saved nearly 100 lives.
Equally noteworthy for courage, judgment, and a fine
display of seamanship, was the conduct of Mr. Arthur
Rowland Jones, the Lusitanicfs first officer. This officer,
who had been in the Cunard Company's service for seven
years, was in the first-class dining-saloon at the time of
the explosion. Going immediately on deck, he found that
the ship was already severely listing, and he was only
able to make his way to his boat-station hanging on to
the rail and with great difficulty. He loaded two boats,
one with eighty, and one with about sixty-five passengers,
and successfully lowered both of them, entering the latter
himself, just as the boat deck of the Lusitania was level
with the water, and only about fifteen seconds before she
actually went down. With very great skill, he enabled
his boat to keep afloat in spite of the tremendous suction
and turmoil caused by the sinking liner, and the fact
that the Marconi aerial wire came down across the top
of his boat and very nearly sank it. After that, having
observed near him an almost empty boat, he secured this,
and, manning her with the boatswain's mate, a seaman,
the assistant purser, and about ten stewards, he counted
out about thirty passengers from his own overcrowded
boat and put them in it. He then ordered them to go
back to the wreck in order to pick up as many people
as possible, and this they did, saving a good many lives.
Taking his own boat back again, he once more filled her
up, and then pushed off to the Bluebell, a little fishing-
smack about five miles away, in which he placed his
passengers.
Having thus emptied his boat of passengers, he again
pulled back towards the wreck, and, after having made
about two and a half miles, he fell in with a broken col-
lapsible boat in a bad condition, with about thirty-five
injured and exhausted people lying in its bottom. All
these he took on board his own boat, the collapsible boat
424 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
then drifting away in a sinking state. Shortly after this he
was overhauled by a trawler, in which he placed all these
people. This trawler took him in tow, Mr. Jones himself
remaining in the lifeboat until the spot was reached where
the Lusitania had sunk. He then pulled off and saved
another ten people, two of whom, however, died before
he could get them ashore. These he placed on board
the Flying Fox, a Queenstown tender. By this time,
nearly eight o'clock in the evening, his crew was at the
last point of exhaustion, and, since a large number of
cruisers, destroyers, and patrol-boats had in the mean-
time arrived on the scene, Mr. Jones took his men on board
the Flying Fox, ultimately reaching Queenstown about
eleven o'clock at night.
From the foregoing narratives, which are typical of
the behaviour of the whole crew, it will be seen that the
high standard of courage of the British Mercantile Marine
was never more signally illustrated than in the case of
the Lusitania ; and this was all the more admirable when
it is remembered that, at the commencement of the war,
the Cunard Company had lost all its Royal Naval Reserve
and Fleet Reserve men, and the managers had had to
engage the best men they could get, and to train them as
well as possible in the time at their disposal.
With regard to Captain Turner, certain criticisms,
as already stated, were afterwards made as to his judg-
ment in handling his vessel before the disaster occurred.
These were mainly based upon four considerations — that
he had approached somewhat near to the neighbouring
headlands, that he had reduced speed to 18 knots, that he
was not pursuing a mid-channel course, and that he had
not, as the Admiralty had advised, zigzagged his vessel.
In reply to these criticisms Captain Turner asserted that
he had reduced speed in order that he should not have to
delay outside the Bar at Liverpool, in a position where
he had reason to believe he might be especially vulner-
able to enemy submarines ; that he had remained at
what he believed to be a safe distance from headlands
consistent with obtaining an accurate knowledge of his
vessel's position, and that, in view of the Admiralty
message as to the submarines that had been sighted
twenty miles off Coningbeg, he was fully justified in re-
solving upon a course that would bring him close to the
CH. x] LORD MERSEY'S CONCLUSION 425
lightship and as far as possible from the enemy submarines.
In respect to the advice as to zigzagging, Captain Turner
admitted that he had misunderstood the Admiralty notice,
believing that these tactics were to be adopted only
in the actual presence of hostile submarines, and not
also in waters where they were merely suspected to be
operating. After the disaster occurred Captain Turner,
as was unanimously admitted, bore himself according to
the best traditions of the British Mercantile Marine. He
was on the bridge when the vessel was struck, and he
remained there to the last, going down with his vessel.
His first order was to lower all the boats to the rail — a
command obeyed as far as possible — and he then ordered
4 Women and children first." He also had the ship's
head turned towards the land, but the vessel had
become unmanageable owing to the damage to the
engine-room. It was not until he had been in the water
for three hours that Captain Turner was rescued.
On the question of his conduct in view of the various
Admiralty Notices, Lord Mersey, after expert advice,
expressed himself in the following terms :
" The conclusion at which I have arrived is that blame
ought not to be imputed to the captain. The advice
given to him, although meant for his most serious
and careful consideration, was not intended to deprive
him of the right to exercise his skilled judgment in
the difficult questions that might arise from time
to time in the navigation of his ship. His omission
to follow the advice in all respects cannot fairly
be attributed either to negligence or to incompetence.
He exercised his judgment for the best. It was the judg-
ment of a skilled and experienced man, and although
others might have acted differently and perhaps more
successfully, he ought not, in my opinion, to be blamed.
The whole blame for the cruel destruction of life in this
catastrophe must rest solely with those who plotted and
with those who committed the crime."
Such was the sinking of the Lusitania, and its effect
upon the whole civilised world was immediate and un-
forgettable. As the late Mr. Theodore Roosevelt said, it
represented " not merely piracy, but piracy on a vaster
426 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
scale of murder than any old-time pirate ever practised."
This was the verdict of practically every neutral nation,
vividly reflected in the almost universal condemnation
of their representative Press organs. Thus the well-known
Dutch newspaper the Handels Blad stated, " This act is
opposed to every law and every sentiment of humanity,
and we raise our voice, however powerless it may be,
in protest. A seafaring people which has any self-respect
does not make war of annihilation against defenceless
people." The Swedish paper, the Nya Dagligt Allehanda,
condemned it as an " unpardonable crime against human-
ity," and a Norwegian paper, the Aften Posten, spoke
for them all in saying, " The mad and reckless action of
the German submarine has now reached its culminating
point. The whole world looks with horror and detestation
on the event."
In Germany, on the other hand, the sinking of the
Lusitania was received with practically unanimous ap-
proval. In the words of Mr. J. W. Gerard, then American
Ambassador in Berlin, "A great wave of exultation swept
over Germany. It was felt that this was a master-stroke,
that victory was appreciably nearer, and that no power
on earth could withstand the brute power of the Empire."
The Kolnische Volkszeitung of May 10th, 1915, said :
" The sinking of the Lusitania is a success for our sub-
marines which must be placed beside the greatest
achievements of the naval war. . . . The sinking of the
great British steamer is a success the moral significance of
which is still greater than the material success. With
joyful pride we contemplate this latest deed of our Navy,
and it will not be the last." Five days later, the Kolnische
Zeitung endorsed this statement by proclaiming that
" the news will be received by the German people with
unanimous satisfaction, since it proves to England and
the whole world that Germany is quite in earnest with
regard to her submarine warfare."
Not only did the city of Magdeburg propose to honour
the officers and men who had committed this murder,
but a committee was actually formed there for the purpose
of collecting money as a national gift for those who had
thus slaughtered so many hundreds of helpless men,
women, and children, and inflicted the anguish of bereave-
ment on so many hundreds more. Nor was that all,
CH. x] THE AUTHORS OF THE CRIME 427
for a medal was struck in Munich, and widely distributed
throughout the whole of Germany, in commemoration
of an act which, outside its borders, had brought down
upon the German peoples the execration of the world.
Upon whom ultimately the responsibility for issuing
the order that led to this tragedy must rest may never
with certainty be known. But, according to Mr. J. W.
Gerard, there was no question of a mistake, or of orders
exceeded or disobeyed.1 Count von Bernstorff had, in
Mr. Gerard's words, " Frankly, boldly, definitely, and
impudently advised to the world, with the authority of
the German Government, that the attempt to sink the
Lusitania would be made." Admiral von Tirpitz " openly
showed his approval of the act, and threw all his influence
in favour of a continuation of the ruthless tactics. But a
question that involved a breach of International Law, a
possible break with a friendly Power, could not be decided
by even the Foreign Office and Navy together. . . . All
the evidence points to the Emperor himself as the respon-
sible head who, at this time, ordered or permitted this
form of murder. The orders were given at a time when
the Emperor dominated the General Staff, not in one of
those periods when the General Staff, as at present, domin-
ated the Emperor. When I saw the Kaiser in October
1915, he said that he would not have sunk the Lusitania,
that no gentleman would ever kill so many women and
children. Yet he never disapproved the order. ... A
man is responsible for the logical results of his own acts.
It may be, too, that Charles IX, when he ordered, perhaps
reluctantly, the massacre of Saint Bartholomew, did not
know that so many would be killed, but there can be no
Pilate-washing-of-the-hands ; the Emperor William was
responsible, he must bear the blame before the world."
This record of one of the foulest crimes in the history
of the war would be incomplete were nothing said of the
fate of the German Kapitan-Leutnant Schwieger, who was
responsible for the loss of so many lives. In September
1917 he was in command of U88 and the hero of the Ger-
man people, having stepped into the place occupied at
an earlier stage by Otto Weddigen. U88 was pro-
ceeding in company with another submarine from a Ger-
man port when she entered a mine-field. The escort having
1 Four Years in Germany, by J. W. Gerard.
428 SINKING OF THE " LUSITANIA " [CH. x
left them, both the submersible vessels were travelling
submerged. What happened to the U88 is uncertain,
but the commander of the other submarine afterwards
reported that he found his vessel embarrassed by a heavy
chain, suggesting to him that he had invaded a recently-
laid British mine-field. He was about to rise to the surface,
his only chance of safety, when he felt a heavy explosion.
On reaching the surface, he tried to communicate by wire-
less and other signals with U88, but got no replies. Noth-
ing was ever heard of the vessel. Presumably Kapitan-
Leutnant Schwieger, in company with his crew, paid the
full penalty for the ocean crimes which, with unexampled
ferocity and callousness, he had committed.
CHAPTER XI
THE ADVENT OF THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE
DURING the winter of 1914-15 Germany had built a number
of ocean-going submarines, able to keep at sea for longer
periods and more formidably armed than those with which
she commenced the war. By the end of April these improved
craft had begun to pass down the west coast of Ireland;
with results on British shipping which have already been
indicated. Submarines were also seen off the approaches
to Queenstown and the River Shannon. But all the
embarrassing incidents of these days with which the
Auxiliary Patrol grappled manfully were to be over-
shadowed by the work which the sinking of the Cunard
liner Lusitania threw on these craft.
There was ample evidence that submarines were hovering
about the south coast of Ireland. As early as 3.30 a.m.
on the day of the disaster, a U-boat was seen near Dun-
more, Waterford ; a second at the entrance to Gascanane
Sound, just to the east of Cape Clear, where such low-lying
craft could easily hide behind rocks; and at 5.40 a.m.
a submarine was sighted — probably the one that was near
Gascanane Sound — eight miles north-west of Brow Head
going north-west, possibly to meet the Lusitania as she
approached the latitude of Mizen Head. Still another was
seen at 4.30 a.m. near Castlehaven, proceeding slowly,
this probably being the one which was reported five hours
later by the Auxiliary Patrol Motor-boat No. 47 off Cape
Clear. At 1.45 p.m. a submarine was seen off the entrance
to Glandore Harbour. Meanwhile the great Cunarder was
approaching land, and before another hour had passed the
Lusitania had been torpedoed and sunk, probably by the
U-boat which was cruising off Glandore, which lies between
Galley Head, and Castlehaven.
The disposition of the Auxiliary Patrol vessels in this
429
430 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
area was as follows ; the Queenstown trawlers Sarba, Blue-
bell, and Heron, under the orders of Admiral Coke, Vice-
Admiral commanding the coast of Ireland, patrolling
between Kinsale and Ballycottin, and the trawlers Indian
Empire, Clifton, Maximus, and Reliance between Bally-
cottin and Carnsore Point. The area through which the
Lusitania passed, Mizen Head to Kinsale, was patrolled by
the trawlers Freesia, Verbena, and Restango. Motor-boat
No. 47, Seagull, had at 9.50 a.m. chased a submarine for ten
minutes five miles south of Cape Clear, and then gone into
Baltimore to report this fact. This information was sent by
wireless to the Lusitania at 1 p.m., but was not acknow-
ledged by her. In addition to the above craft, the trawler
Luneda, based on Berehaven, was patrolling off the Mizen.
With the exception of the above vessels and the motor-boat
Aptera, which was somewhere near Kinsale, there were no
other patrols in the neighbourhood, as, at the time, the
yachts Greta and Aster were undergoing repairs ; the
trawlers Brock, Margate, and Bradford were coaling ; and the
trawlers Congo, Ebro, Reindeer II, and Lucida were also
in port owing to defects.
At eleven minutes past two o'clock the Valentia wireless
station picked up the Lusitania's " S.O.S." signal, and
a few minutes later Queenstown received the message.
All tugs and small craft and the Queenstown trawlers
on patrol were ordered to proceed immediately to the
rescue. The Admiralty tugs Stormcock and Warrior were
the first to get out of Queenstown, but the trawler Brock
(Lieutenant-Commander T. B. H. Whytehead, R.N.R.),
which was coaling at the time, got away very smartly,
and the Queenstown drifter Golden Effort (Commander
Birchan, R.N.V.R.) was also soon under way. In addition
the trawler Bradford, the tug Flying Fox, the examination
ship Julia, and three torpedo-boats proceeded to the spot.
Some time was taken in informing the trawlers at sea, the
Indian Empire being the only vessel of this class near
Queenstown which was fitted with wireless.
No time was lost in getting to the scene of the disaster
and picking up survivors. At 8.30 p.m. the Stormcock
arrived back with her complement, followed by the Indian
Empire (Lieutenant W. H. Wood, R.N.R.), which had on
board 170 souls, the largest number of survivors brought
in by any one vessel. In this party were only three of
CH. xi] A PATROL-VESSEL TO THE RESCUE 431
her crew, the remainder having been left behind in
boats. These trawlers had seen many dead bodies ; and
men and women with little clothing left to them, whom they
picked up, they readily furnished with their own blankets
and most of their clothing. The trawler Bluebell arrived
in port bringing Captain Turner, the master of the Lusitania,
together with another officer and some passengers. Later
another trawler rescued the third intermediate officer.
The patrol- vessels had done all that was possible having
regard to the paucity of their numbers. In the original
disposition of the vessels throughout the British Isles
none could have foreseen that within a year of the war
this area about Ireland would become such an important
zone. Elsewhere the demands for destroyers and auxiliary
patrol craft was so incessant that few could be spared.
Now that the enemy had shown that he had ocean-going
submarines, and was determined to use them ruthlessly
so far away from his base, the Admiralty had to reconsider
the whole subject, and make important modifications.
In the afternoon and evening following the sinking
of the Lusitania submarines were sighted several times
between Baltimore and Kin sale off the coast. Four days
later the trawler Brock saw the conning-tower and wash of
a submarine four miles south-west of Daunt Rock Light-
ship, at the entrance to Queenstown, and fired on her. On
May 25th another steamship — an American — was torpedoed
off the Atlantic coast. This happened at 8.24 p.m., fifty
miles west of the Fastnet. The Nebraskan had left Liverpool
the day before in ballast. Suddenly a violent explosion
occurred, bursting the hatch and deck at No. 1 hold, and
throwing the cargo derrick thirty feet into the air. No
submarine was seen, but the chief engineer had sighted the
wake of a torpedo. An S.O.S. signal was sent out, and at
9.30 p.m. the patrol-vessel Scadaun, a drifter converted
into a yacht and commanded by Lieutenant W. Olphert,
R.N.R., picked up the message from the Nebraskan asking
for help. The Scadaun at the time was patrolling off Castle-
haven not far from where the Lusitania had been torpedoed,
and instantly proceeded at full speed, meeting the Nebraskan
twenty-six miles west of the Fastnet. Instructing the
American ship to obscure all lights, the Scadaun's com-
mander informed her that he would stand by her, and then,
steaming at 9J knots, he escorted her to Liverpool,, where
29
432 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
she arrived well down by the head. Probably it was the
same submarine which fourteen hours later torpedoed
the s.s. Morwenna when 160 miles west by south of St.
Ann's Head, at the entrance to Milford Haven.
The incident has significance, as once again an unarmed
fishing vessel was able to render magnificent service. The
Morwenna was bound from Cardiff to Sydney, Cape Breton,
Canada, when she sighted the conning- tower of a submarine.
Course was immediately altered to get the submarine
right astern, extra firemen were sent below, and the engineer
was ordered to get a full pressure of steam. In spite of
these efforts, the submarine gained upon the merchant-
man, and fired shots at a range of about three-quarters of
a mile, signalling the steamer to stop. Already one man
had been killed and two others x wounded when a vessel
was sighted on the starboard bow, making straight for
the Morwenna. Thereupon the enemy fired a couple of
shells at the approaching ship, which turned out to be the
Belgian fishing trawler Jacqueline, of Ostend, which had
been fishing out of Milford. Both the submarine and the
Morwenna took her to be a patrol trawler. Whilst the
submarine continued to fire, the Morwenna was able to
get out her boats, and thus save her crew. After having
torpedoed the Morwenna the submarine made off, still
firing at the Belgian, and then submerged. The skipper
of the trawler, Eugene Blonde, had performed a most
plucky act in coming to the rescue, having no other weapon
than the stem of his ship. Although provided with neutral
flags by his agent at Milford to display in the presence of
an enemy submarine, he proudly hoisted his national
colours, and advanced to attack with the greatest de-
termination and courage, as Admiral Dare bore testi-
mony. " I consider the action of Captain Blonde of the
Jacqueline was most creditable," wrote the Morwenna' s
captain, " his intention being to ram the submarine if
possible ; and the courageous manner in which he kept
running evidently gave the German commander the im-
pression that the trawler was armed, as when they were
about 200 yards from each other, the submarine made off
with all speed, and shortly after dived out of sight. Then
the trawler picked up the boats, and after getting all on
board, including the body of one sailor killed, proceeded
to Milford Haven." For this gallant act in life-saving,
CH. xi] SUBMARINE ROUTES 433
skipper Blonde was awarded the silver medal of the Royal
Humane Society, and the sum of £2 was sent to each of his
crew. " I regret," wrote this Belgian skipper, " that I had
no gun on board of my ship ; otherwise the submarine had
been sunk without doubt, our speed being insufficient to
ram her. I beg to submit to the competent authority the
proposal to put a gun on board of my vessel," one more
proof that fishermen are much the same all the world over.
It was just such a petition that our own fishermen were
always presenting, and they showed themselves ready
enough to attack the enemy, even though no gun could be
afforded them. The school of the sea is the finest of all
for the development of character and courage.
And now we may pause to take a survey of the acti-
vities of the Auxiliary Patrol at this period of the war.
Two routes only were available to the enemy by which
to get out to the Atlantic approach — either by way of the
Dover Straits, or by a course round the north of Scotland.
In the latter case there was a choice of coming down the
west coast of Ireland and continuing to the latitude of
the Fastnet, and so to the Scillies ; or alternatively, after
leaving Scottish waters, of negotiating the North Channel,
thence passing down the Irish Sea and St. George's Channel
and on to the Scillies.
Many difficulties beset the submarine on these routes.
Local destroyer and torpedo-boat patrols might at any
time be met issuing from various bases, and apart from
all attacks on the way by these craft, the penetration of
the Dover Straits, when reached, was a most perilous
undertaking. Off the East Goodwins were armed drifters ;
another division patrolled near the Ruytingen shoal ;
a third division guarded a boom in the Downs ; whilst yet
a fourth division was on patrol at the northern end of the
Downs. A British mine-field lay across the Straits, and
the Dover drifters with their nets stretched towards
the French coast, the nets at this time being made more
dangerous by the attachment of explosive mines. The
German Intelligence Service was good ; the general position
of the net area no doubt was known to the enemy, and
those submarines which operated well up the English
Channel most likely felt their way through the obstacle
by night, travelling semi-submerged, taking account of
434 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
the period of the moon and the state of the tide when choos-
ing the most suitable opportunity. It was an exceedingly
difficult task to detect a submarine at night in this trim.
As a means of assisting the patrols, instruments known
as hydrophones were early in May installed in the Gull,
South Goodwin, and Varne Lightships. These hydro-
phones were a scientific contrivance by means of which the
movements of a submarine could be heard. A long series
of experiments had been carried out in the Firth of
Forth ; the instruments were not yet thoroughly efficient,
and it was not until a later date that they became of
importance for trapping the U-boat.
As the submarine came down the English Channel
westward bound, there were armed yachts and trawlers
based on Dover, Newhaven, and Portsmouth to be evaded.
If a course were taken past the Wight, drifter nets lay out
in Christchurch Bay, where the craft might be tempted
to rest at night. Inshore, towards Anvil Point, off Poole,
two motor-boats made a nightly patrol in case a submarine
should be on the surface charging batteries or communi-
cating with the land. To seaward towards Portland the
Poole drifters worked their nets ; over a hundred of these
vessels operated in relays, one section relieving the other
for return to harbour to replenish and refit. Beyond
this area were the Portland drifters and trawlers. The
former cast their nets across the Channel from Portland
to the Casquets ; and at the centre of the Channel — that
is to say, about twenty miles south of the line joining Start
Point to St. Catherine's Point — which wras known to be fre-
quented by submarines, the Portland trawlers patrolled.
Similarly, while protecting their part of the trade route,
Portsmouth craft were watching the route between twenty
miles south of St. Catherine's and twenty miles south o
Beachy Head.
Off Plymouth were the local auxiliary craft, and farther
west the Falmouth trawlers slowly beat up and down the
Channel. These Falmouth vessels worked in pairs, and
as far as possible steered the same course (or its con-
trary) as the merchant steamers, so as to be in any neigh-
bourhood where an attack by submarines was likely to
occur. Between the Lizard and Gribbin Head, the coast
was patrolled by the Falmouth drifters to a distance of
five miles from the shore, trawlers operating outside
CH. xi] BRISTOL CHANNEL AND IRISH SEA 435
that line. All patrols were ordered to be not more
than a mile apart from each other. Submarines when in
the neighbourhood of the Scillies were hunted by armed
yachts, trawlers, and drifters ; whilst in Admiral Dare's
area between the Welsh and Irish coasts were the Milford
patrol- vessels. These were on duty from the Coningbeg
Lightship to Newquay ; from the Smalls to the Barrells
off Carnson Point ; from Coningbeg northward along the
Irish Coast to Wicklow Head ; from the Smalls northward
through Cardigan Bay to Bardsey Island and across to
Wicklow Head ; and from St. Go van's Lightship to Lundy
Island and Hartland Point. For this purpose the Admiral
had under his command a couple of armed yachts, two
dozen armed trawlers, and forty-nine net-drifters — a
complete striking force with which he could always keep
in communication by means of signal- stations and wireless
telegraphy. In addition, the Belfast yacht squadron, con-
sisting of the armed yachts Marynthea, Jeanette, Sapphire,
Medusa, Narcissus, and Valiant, was before the end of
May placed under Admiral Dare's orders. These six
yachts worked wherever submarines might be reported
in the area east of long. 10° 30' W. and north of lat.
50° N. Their duty was to prevent submarines from fre-
quenting any particular locality or destroying successive
merchant ships ; and the yachts, armed with 12 -pounders,
and remaining six days at sea, followed by two days in
harbour, were so stationed as to harass the enemy and
keep him continually on the move.
Farther up the Irish Sea, drifters worked their nets
between twenty and thirty miles north-east of Great
Orme's Head, attended by armed craft, and some more
drifters operated their nets five miles off the Liverpool
Bar. Thus any renewed attacks on Liverpool shipping
would be greatly hindered. Nets were also used off
Holyhead, off the Calf of Man, and off the Mull of
Galloway. Between Dublin and the Kish Lightship one
unit patrolled each night from six o'clock till 10.30 p.m.,
acting as scouts prior to the departure of the cross-Channel
steamers from Dublin to Holyhead. During the daytime
this unit patrolled the Irish coast from St. John's Point
to Wicklow Head.
It is extremely doubtful if submarines were able to
penetrate the netted area of the_North Channel. -Nine
436 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. XT
sections of twelve drifters guarded this area, some of them
having been fitted with "cruiser" mines, ready to be dropped
on any submarine which might get foul of the nets. The
drifters, now using the glass balls instead of the kapok,
steamed continuously towing their nets across, so as to
form a perpetual double line by day and by night. By
these means the whole of the English Channel and the
Irish Sea was rendered as dangerous for submarines as
was possible, although it proved difficult in practice to
shut out a foe that could render himself invisible by
submersion. Along the south and west coasts of Ireland,
from Carnsore Point away to Sybil Point, there were only
four units ; the leader of each unit disposed his ships,
according to the number available, by sections of three,
each section cruising in line abreast two miles apart in
fine weather. The general principle observed was to keep
out during the daytime on a line of traffic averaging
from ten to fifteen miles off the coast, and to close the
land and patrol the coast and bays during the night.
In the North Sea, whilst the trawler mine-sweepers
continued to keep clear the channels along the shore, and
the paddlers and other craft swept up mine-fields laid farther
out, patrol- vessels navigating the waters from the Downs to
the Orkneys maintained incessant watch for the appearance
of U-boats. In order to 'avoid such patrols, the enemy,
bound via the North of Scotland for his cruising-ground off
Ireland, was forced to keep well away from the Scottish
shore until he made the land about Rattray Head. From
there northward to Lerwick the submarines operated,
and they were able, not without difficulty, to push through
the Fair Isle Channel and so round the north of Scotland
and past the Hebrides to Ireland. To counteract this
movement, trawlers were sent to cruise well eastward
of Rattray Head, in the expectation that they might pick
up the enemy before he altered course for the northward ;
and in order to increase the efficiency of the patrols in
the Fair Isle Channel and strengthen the Shetlands Patrol,
drifters were sent with indicator nets into these waters.
In short, wherever the enemy went, whether proceeding
north or south, he was beset by vessels of an enormous
new navy, manned by officers and men possessing the
British fighting spirit, though not yet supplied with the
apperfected paratus which three years later proved the
CH. xi] TRAWLER'S SUCCESSFUL ACTION 487
most effectual means of combating the submarine. The
Royal Navy had been prepared by long years of study
and experience for fleet actions and for destroyer engage-
ments, but for a long submarine war it possessed neither
the data from which to deduce principles nor the means
to put such principles into practice. Much shipping was
lost, many valuable lives were sacrificed, before a really
satisfactory method of attacking the submarine was
evolved. Circumstances necessitated that the Navy
should carry on a new form of sea warfare with its old
weapons until new and more effective ones could be
devised.
In spite of all these drawbacks, the Auxiliary Patrol
did remarkably well and maintained the best traditions
of the older Navy whenever opportunity presented itself.
Such occasions were frequent. The spirit animating the
Service, of determination to make the best use of its
available resources and to miss no opportunity for battle,
whatever the odds, was well displayed in an engagement
in which the armed trawler Limewold figured. On
May 8th she was patrolling twenty miles east of Peter-
head. Her own commanding officer being on shore sick,
the trawler was in charge of Acting Skipper C. C. Bond.
At 4.30 in the morning, Mr. Bond, when on duty in the
wheel-house, was startled by the bursting of a shell close to
his bows, causing water to splash aboard. He then saw a
submarine about a mile and a half away right astern,
overhauling him fast. The skipper at once manned his
6-pounder, brought his ship three points to port so that
the gun would bear, and proceeded to engage the enemy.
Before the trawler was able to get into action, the sub-
marine fired her second shot, which again passed very
near. A third shot from the German was well directed,
passing between the Limewold's bridge and mast. The
trawler's first two or three shots fell just over her op-
ponent. By this time the alteration of the patrol- vessel's
position and the sheering about of the submarine to star-
board, in order to keep herself astern of the trawler,
exposed the German's port side. The trawler's fifth shot
hit the submarine square on the water-line, abreast of
the conning-tower, the shell bursting with a cloud of
flame and black smoke. The distance was 600 yards, an
effective range for a 6-pounder. A few seconds later,
438 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
as the trawler fired her sixth shot, the submarine sub-
merged, her stern having risen fifteen feet into the air,
and was not seen again. The Limewold sounded her
steam whistle to attract other vessels, and proceeded to
the spot where the enemy had been last seen, then making
for Peterhead. The circumstances were investigated,
and were not deemed to afford conclusive evidence that
the submarine had been sunk. The Admiralty sent an
expression of their appreciation to Acting Skipper Bond
and the crew, together with a sum of £100 to be divided
among them.
A fortnight later the trawler Ontario (Skipper G. Gar-
land), patrolling in the neighbourhood of Fair Isle Channel,
sighted a submarine steering to the south-west, about
four miles off. The trawler put on full speed, and at a
range of 3,000 yards opened fire with her starboard gun.
It could be seen that the submarine was a vessel of a
large type, painted a slate grey, with a gun abaft the con-
ning-tower. The Ontario's shots fell all round the enemy
ship, and the eighth and eleventh appeared to strike the
hull and explode there, though there was doubt about
the matter. No fewer than twenty-one rounds in all were
fired by the trawler. Finally the submarine made away
on the surface at high speed.
On the evening of May 25th, net- drifter Unity left
Yarmouth, Isle of Wight, for her station, and at 8.30 p.m.
shot her mine nets three miles south-south-west of the
Needles, and drifted with them through the night. Next
morning she commenced to haul the nets aboard, but when
most of them were got in, a violent pull was felt,
the force being so great that the Unity was towed stern
first through the water until the 2j-inch strop, to which
the nets were secured, parted. Three nets then ran out
rapidly back into the sea, but they were cut adrift.
Before the strop had parted, the warp and foot-rope,
which had been secured together, were seen to be taut
on the top of the water, and a swirling eddy such as would
be caused by a revolving propeller was also observed.
Furthermore, a dan-buoy which had been made fast to
the end of the net was towed under water for a short
distance and then reappeared and remained stationary.
In order to mark the spot, the skipper dropped another
dan-buoy with its sinker, and being quite certain that a
CH. xi] AN ESCAPE FROM THE NETS 439
submarine was foul of the nets, fired seven rockets and two
sound rockets. Unfortunately these were not observed.
The drifter New Dawn being, sighted two miles off, the
skipper steamed up to her and requested her to report the
incident to the signal-station. The Unity then returned
to her nets and remained steaming round them, assisted
later by the New Dawn. Subsequently the senior naval
officer from Yarmouth arrived, and seven torpedo-boats
and three destroyers made search for some miles around,
but nothing was discovered.
Examination of the nets revealed the fact that fifty
yards of the lower half of the end net had been completely
torn away, the foot-rope had been broken away from the
warp, and nearly all the broken parts of the net showed
distinct signs of having been cut by a sharp instrument,
the towing-rope being marked in several places. There
was no question whatever that a submarine had passed
through the nets, that the nets had held him for a few
minutes, and that the cutting of the wires of the net had
been done by a sharp net- cutter fitted for this purpose
to the submarine. It had saved the U-boat on this
occasion ; and when nearly four years later the great sur-
render of the German Navy took place, a swan-like
erection was noticed on some of the U-boats, securely
fastened at the bows on deck, with a series of knife-like
cutters. This was the German's antidote to one of our
most exasperating traps. Had depth charges been in use
at this time, certainly one more German submarine would
have failed to return to its base.
Experience had proved the value of light- draught
paddle excursion steamers for mine-sweeping, their speed
enabling them to make a sweep of 495 miles on the Dogger
Bank area in four days, and four more of these craft were
taken up and fitted out at the Royal Albert Docks, London,
and manned by ratings of the Trawler Reserve. The
ships were sent subsequently to Dover. Later one of
the paddle- steamers was sweeping when a mine exploded
under her stern with such force that her hull was damaged
and the remains of her kite were sent up into the air, to
come crashing down over the engine-room just above the
head of the assistant engineer, Royal Naval Reserve,
making a hole six feet by four. The assistant engineer
fortunately escaped.
440 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
Throughout this period, when the enemy was waging
war with mine and submarine with ruthless persistency,
fishermen in the North Sea still continued to bring back
the fish which the nation so badly needed. Every voyage
was accompanied by risk, for many trawlers had foundered
on mines, or were taken unawares by submarines, as we
have already recorded. The danger was reduced as far
as possible by the plans which the Admiralty, realising
the need, had made. Armed yachts and armed trawlers,
the latter disguised to resemble fishing craft, operated on
the Dogger Bank with such alertness that the enemy
considered discretion the better part of valour and rarely
attacked. Farther north in Scottish waters, where
fishing continued, a Peterhead trawler was detailed to
steam off the coast between Aberdeen and Buchaness,
and to use her trawl occasionally in order to entice a
submarine. Two other trawlers were stationed among
the Aberdeen fishing fleet, making themselves units of
the fleet for the same purpose. For during May submarines
had been sinking vessels from fourteen to seventy miles
east of Aberdeen, and forty miles to the south-east of
Peterhead.
May Day, 1915, was marked by " a certain liveliness "
— the phrase of the First Lord — in the southern portion
of the North Sea. During the forenoon the British de-
stroyer RECRUIT was torpedoed and sunk by a submarine
two miles east-south-east of the Galloper Lightship, but
rescuing trawlers saved many of the crew. The same
afternoon another loss occurred, this time a trawler and
her gallant crew, farther across the North Sea. Four
trawlers were on patrol: the Miura (Sub-Lieutenant L.
W. Kersley, R.N.R.) was on a course a little to the north-
east of the North Hinder Lightship; the Chirsit (Sub-
Lieutenant A. Stablefold, R.N.R.) a little farther to the
south-east of the lightship ; and the Columbia (Lieutenant-
Commander W. H. Hawthorne, R.N.R.) about four miles
to the west-north-west of the position. Beyond the
Columbia still farther to the west-north-west was the
trawler Barbados, commanded by Lieutenant Sir James
Domville, Bart., R.N., the senior ship of the four. The
division was searching for a German submarine which had
fired a torpedo at the Columbia that morning off Thornton
Ridge. About 3 p.m. a couple of torpedo-bpats were
CH. xi] TRAWLERS IN ACTION 441
sighted approaching from the west-south-west, in quarter-
line formation, flying no ensign. When little more than
500 yards distant they hoisted the German flag, and the
leader fired a torpedo at the Columbia, which missed.
Thereupon Sir James Domville, from the Barbados,
opened fire. Very shortly afterwards a second torpedo
was fired at the Columbia, striking on the port side abreast
of the wheel-house, and she sank. Two torpedoes were
also aimed at the Barbados, but just missed, and a heavy
fire was kept up by the enemy from machine guns and
6- pounders. By this time the trawlers Chirsit and the
Miura also joined in the action at long range, whereupon
one of the torpedo-boats sheered off towards the Chirsit,
It was an unequal fight from the beginning, but the
little trawlers, their Royal Naval Reserve officers, and their
senior officer, Lieutenant Sir James Domville, fought with
characteristic spirit. At the outset the skipper of the
Barbados was wounded, so that Sir James Domville
had to carry on in the wheel-house by himself. This part
of the ship was the enemy's target, and inside this structure
Lieutenant Domville was being hit by splinters. On
several occasions he was knocked down. But the trawlers
put up such a stiff fight that after twenty minutes the
nearer of the torpedo-boats was compelled to increase
the range to 1,200 yards. Shortly afterwards volumes
of steam were seen issuing from her and she stopped.
The Barbados then closed her, but the German craft
got her machinery going, and together with the other tor-
pedo-boat escaped to the south-south-east. Had the
affair finished there, it would have been a victory for the
trawlers, who with inferior speed and armament kept the
enemy engaged until he declined to fight any longer. But
this was not the end.
Half an hour later, the Barbados, by firing her gun
and blowing her siren, was able to attract the attention
of the destroyer LEONIDAS, which came up from the south-
west and was informed of what had occurred. Thereupon
the LEONIDAS and two other destroyers gave chase, whilst
the Barbados returned to where the Columbia had been
sunk, and discovered that only one survivor had been
saved, the man, a deck-hand, having been picked up by
the Miura. The destroyers pursuing the enemy torpedo-
boats succeeded in sinking both of thera ; so retribution
442 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
came quickly. In accordance with British ideas of the
chivalry of the sea, efforts were at once made to save
human life. Lieutenant Hartnoll himself went into the
water to rescue a German.
Two officers and forty-four men of the German torpedo-
boats, out of a total of fifty-nine, were picked up, and
from these prisoners was learnt something of the callous-
ness of the Germans to the sense of honour respected by
seamen. They admitted that from the Columbia they
had picked up a " two-striped officer " and two men.
This officer must have been Lieutenant- Commander Haw-
thorne, but when asked what had become of him they
casually remarked that their prisoners were below and time
was short ; so whilst they took the first opportunity to
save themselves, they left three British sailors to their
fate.
Another member of the German crews saved had had
an extraordinary experience. As the German torpedo-
boats were altering course, this man was swept overboard
by the wash. A lifebuoy marked " A6 " was thrown
to him, and picked up. He was then rescued by the
Norwegian s.s. Varild, which happened to be passing, and
from her he was handed over to the Miura. This
prisoner stated that the torpedo-craft had come out from
Zeebrugge at noon that day. It was learnt from the
solitary British survivor that when struck the Columbia
immediately broke in half, and sank in less than a
minute, whilst the enemy all the time kept up fire from
his machine guns and six guns, and did not neglect to
fire even on a few men in the water who were endeavouring
to save themselves.
The death of Lieutenant -Commander Hawthorne was
a great loss to the Auxiliary Patrol Service. At the
beginning of the war he had come to England from Canada
at his own expense as a volunteer, and he had been con-
stantly employed in most dangerous work ever since.
The trawlers had fought most gallantly. In the Barbados
the little 3-pounder was fired with excellent direction and
rapidity by Petty Officer A. H. Hallett ; the deck-hands
and engine-room staff showed conspicuous courage. The
Miura and Chirsit, by their effective long-range gunnery,
had undoubtedly helped to save the Barbados and to
cause the enemy to retire. The Admiralty expressed
CH. xi] A COWARDLY FOE 443
their appreciation of the way in which the trawlers had
fought a superior force, and sent a letter on vellum to
Lieutenant Sir James Domville, at the same time awarding
Petty Officer Hallett the D.S.M. It remains only to
observe that this incident was intended as another of
those " tip-and-run " expeditions favoured by the enemy.
During the forenoon considerable activity by hostile
aircraft had been noticed, and undoubtedly the latter
had informed Zeebrugge, from whence had been dispatched
the two torpedo-boats with the intention of destroying
all four trawlers.
In order to confuse the enemy when endeavouring to
decide what craft was a fishing trawler, and what an armed
trawler, various methods were adopted for concealing the
gun. In some cases this was done by the addition of a
foresail. Some of the Portsmouth trawlers thus added
to their disguise, and they also painted the gun with an
ingenious patchwork, according to primitive ideas of
camouflage, which later were so much developed. There
was always a hope that by hiding the gun a trawler might
lure the submarine on till the latter was within range of
gun-fire. ,
The enemy proved often enough the truth of the axiom
that the bully is generally a coward. What, for instance,
could be more cowardly than the following incident ?
The steam-trawler Victoria had left Milford Haven on
May 25th bound for the Labadie Bank, where she was
going to trawl. About five in the evening of June 1st
the sound of firing was heard astern, and a submarine
was observed a long distance away. The Victoria was at
the time about 130 miles west by south of St. Ann's
Head. The submarine was painted grey, and as she had
a mizzen set she had the appearance of a drifter. Without
giving the trawler's crew time to leave the ship, the Ger-
mans shelled her. Even after the Victoria had stopped,
the submarine, from a range of a mile and a half, maintained
a rapid fire. By this time the scene on board the fishing-
vessel was heartrending. A boy named Jones, who had
come with the skipper for the pleasure of the trip, and
had been sent on to the bridge, was killed. The skipper
and chief engineer were also killed, both by one shell.
In addition another shell struck the mate and the
trimmer* who were also killed, a deck-hand being wounded.
444 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
Those who survived found themselves caught in a trap,
as they could not get away from the ship, their boat having
been smashed by the enemy's shells. They therefore
jumped overboard with planks to save themselves.
The submarine went alongside the trawler, placed
explosive charges aboard, removed the wounded deck-hand,
and picked up the other survivors after they had been an
hour and a half in the water. Having been cross-examined
as to whether they were in the Navy, whether there were
any arms on board, and whether they had seen any patrol-
boats, these unhappy men were sent below. During the
night they were given coffee and a biscuit each, and the
deck-hand had his wounds dressed. All night they re-
mained aft near the submarine's engines, and next morning
to their surprise were joined by some more British fisher-
men from another West Country trawler, which had steamed
out of Cardiff the previous day. This was the Hirose, a
vessel built only that year. At 5.30 a.m., when about 130
miles west by south of Lundy Island bound for her fishing-
grounds, her career was brought to a quick end. She was
proceeding at a steady 9 knots, the third hand and the
boatswain being on watch. Her skipper, Mr. Francis Ward,
was below and was called by the boatswain, who shouted :
" Come up, skipper. There are shells flying all round."
He immediately came on deck, ordered all hands to be
called, and rang down for the engines to be stopped.
The shelling then ceased. The skipper rang down again
for full speed ahead, but again the enemy put him under
a heavy fire. Once more the trawler's engines were stopped,
and the boat was ordered out. The submarine came up
astern, and a man in the conning-tower called out to the
men to leave the ship within five minutes. The crew got
into their boat and were ordered to the submarine, where
they found the four men from the trawler Victoria.
Three of the submarine's crew were sent with bombs to
destroy the trawler, and brought back with them the chart -
room clock and binoculars. Then, about 6 a.m., the ten
men from the Hirose, with four from the Victoria, were put
into the boat of the Hirose and cast adrift to manage as
best they could. They rigged up a sail with the boat's
cover and hoisted an oar for a mast. Under this rig they
ran all day, before a strong west-south-west wind and a
heavy sea. Twenty-four hours later they were sighted by
CH. xi] THE SINKING OF FISHING CRAFT 445
the s.s. Ballater, of Liverpool, who picked them up with
difficulty, owing to the heavy sea running, and landed
them at Milford at four the same afternoon. The men
were found by the Ballater just in time, for they were in
an exhausted state, consequent on exposure in an open
boat at the mercy of rough seas, with food that was
sodden by the salt water. The submarine was U34, whose
commanding officer had added one more to the long list
of crimes committed by Germany on the high seas.
On the day that the Hirose was sunk, a submarine
destroyed the Belgian fishing trawler Delta B, about ten
miles south-west of the Bishop Rock. In the North Sea
the attacks upon fishermen were even more frequent
than in western waters. Altogether no fewer than forty-
eight fishing- vessels were sunk during June by submarines,
the principal localities being off the north-east coast of
Scotland, fifty miles east of Lowestoft. and off the Dogger
Bank ; though sinkings of these craft also took place forty
miles south-west of the Lizard, at the approaches to the
Bristol Channel, and at the mouth of the English Channel.
A few examples of these attacks on fishing craft may
be taken as typical of the rest. On June 4th the Aberdeen
fishing-trawler Explorer, when about seventy-three miles
north-east by north of Buchaness, saw a big submarine
come under her stern. It was 7.30 p.m. A shot having
been fired, the submarine commander called out to the
skipper in good English : " Get your boat out at once.
I have no time to lose." Left without choice, the trawler's
crew had no course but to obey. Launching their boat,
they pulled clear, when the U-boat promptly sank the
fishing-vessel with eight shots and then disappeared to
the north-east. The castaways were afterwards picked
up by the sloop ACACIA.
On June 5th the fishing-trawler Japonica, forty-five miles
north-east of Kinnaird Head, was also attacked and sunk
by a submarine. The story is best told in the words of
her skipper, Mr. William Henry Butler :
" It was about eleven o'clock at night, and we were just
shifting watches. The mate had just got on to the bridge, and
we heard a gun fire. Looking to starboard, we saw a shell
explode ahead, which shook the ship. All hands got aft to
get the boat out, the submarine coming along at full speed.
446 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xl
The captain of the submarine sang out, ' Hurry up ! Clear
out ! I'm going to sink you.' We all got into the boat
and pulled towards him, and he said, ' I don't want you
here. Clear out ! ' 4 Can I go back and get some sails
or some food ? ' I asked. ' No,' he answered ; ' clear
to — — out of it ! ' He was about 200 yards from the ship,
and fired two shots, which both missed. The third one
went through the cabin, and the next one went through
the boiler. She sank at twenty-five minutes past eleven."
On the following day H.M.S. ACACIA picked up the
Japonica's crew and took them into port. That same day
U14 was sunk off Peterhead. Later the five Peterhead
patrol trawlers Limewold, Hawk, Oceanic II, Vigilant,
and Gull received the sum of £932 to be divided between
them for their success in bringing about her destruction.
Also on June 5th, another patrol trawler, which was
destined to perform magnificent work during the war
until she foundered on a mine many months later,
did conspicuous service. There is reason to believe
that the enemy assumed at first that this vessel was a
fishing-boat, whereas she had a 12-pounder mounted
forward. The incident occurred at 7 p.m. about eleven
miles west of Mizen Head. The trawler Ina Williams
was steaming towards the Cahirmore Signal- Station,
which is perched on a high hill a few miles to the west
of Berehaven. A large submarine came to the surface
about a couple of miles away on the port beam. The
trawler's commanding officer, Sub-Lieutenant Nettle-
ingham, R.N.R., at once mustered his crew and headed
for the enemy with all possible speed, whereupon the U-
boat quickly fired four or five shots. All these fell short
on the starboard side. She next fired a torpedo, which
was seen to pass within ten feet of the Ina Williams'
starboard quarter. The trawler fired six shots in rapid
succession. Of these the first three fell astern of the
submarine, but each shot got nearer. The enemy, be-
coming nervous, called his guns' crews in, but the trawler's
fourth shot struck the submarine squarely at the water-line
about half-way between the conning-tower and the stern.
The fifth shot also appeared to strike, just abaft the
conning-tower. The submarine was going down when the
sixth shot hit her again at the water-line by the conning-
CH. xi] U-BOAT PUT TO FLIGHT 447
tower, the decks being awash. This last shot was fired at
3,400 yards, the engagement having lasted about fifteen
minutes. The trawler then steamed over the position,
and bubbles of air and a large quantity of oil were
seen to rise. For an hour the Ina Williams continued
to cruise round the spot ; and at the end of that time
there were still bubbles coming up, and the oil had spread
over about 500 yards. The fight, short and sharp, was
much appreciated by the Admiralty, who considered the
shooting remarkable, although there was afterwards reason
to believe that the submarine was not sunk. Mr. Nettle-
ingham received the D.S.C. and was promoted Lieutenant,
and the seaman gunner was also decorated with a D.S.M.
and promoted.
On June 10th, at 1.30 afternoon, the armed trawler
Yokohama, commanded by Sub-Lieutenant C. C. Hum-
phreys, R.N.R., and based on Stornoway, was on patrol
west of the Butt of Lewis. Submarines had been fre-
quenting these waters, lying in wait for supply ships
bound for the Grand Fleet, or passing to or from the West
of Ireland. The Yokohama sighted a submarine on
the starboard bow three miles towards the land. Both
vessels opened fire at the same time, the trawler having
nothing better than a 3-pounder. The enemy had partially
submerged so as to decrease the target. The firing was
the extreme range for the 3-pounder, and the first few
shots seemed to fall close. This annoyed the enemy,
who rose fully out of the water, discharging a torpedo
which passed some ten feet ahead of the trawler. A
second torpedo was also fired, and went under the hull
aft. It was the narrowest possible escape, for the track
was seen by two of the crew aft making straight for
the ship, and the engineer, who was on watch, heard
the torpedo scrape the bottom of the trawler. There-
after the enemy made away to the westward at high speed,
firing as he went. Altogether the Germans had fired about
thirty rounds, not one of which had hit ; her gun was of
a size corresponding to our 12-pounder. Some of the shells,
however, had passed near the trawler ; one went between
the trawler's bridge and the funnel, and another passed
just under the mizzen, which happened to be set at the time.
As soon as the U-boat made^ off, the Yokohama gave chase,
but owing to her inferior speed was soon left behind.
30
448 THE OCEAN-GOING SUBMARINE [CH. xi
The Yokohama's conduct was considered by the Ad-
miralty to merit a monetary reward.
Like the trawlers, the gallant little drifters never showed
hesitation in doing their utmost to defeat the enemy.
An example may be cited of the way they saved a valuable
ship and still more valuable cargo.
On June 12th the U35 was operating about seventy
miles west-south-west of St. Ann's Head, in which neigh-
bourhood were two fine barques, the Crown of India and
the Bellglade. The former was British. She had left
Barry Dock on the previous day bound for Pernambuco
with 3,000 tons of coal. Unfortunately light southerly
winds had prevailed, with misty weather. Owing to these
circumstances and the strong set to the northward, her
master, Captain C. Branch, had endeavoured to keep
well off the island ; otherwise he would have hugged the
shore and evaded attack. A submarine opened fire
upon the Crown of India from half a mile distant. The
sailing-ship was defenceless, and the crew hoisted out
their two boats, in which all twenty-three men took refuge,
and, abandoning their vessel, rowed away towards a Nor-
wegian barque, the Bellglade, which was lying practically
becalmed about three miles away. The submarine fired
again at the Crown of India, which she sank within half
an hour. Not content with this destruction, U35 then
approached the Norwegian, a vessel which was bound
from Halifax, Novia Scotia, for Sharpness with a cargo
of timber, and her master was ordered to come aboard
and bring his papers. This was done, and the Norwegian
master was examined. He was then ordered to abandon
his ship, and the submarine proceeded to fire three shots
amidships and then one at the stern. As the German
was so engaged a steam fishing drifter, the Queen Alexandra,
was seen approaching. The submarine, mistaking her for
a patrol- vessel, abandoned the Bellglade and disappeared.
The drifter picked up the crews of both sailing-ships
and brought them into Milford, leaving the Bellglade still
afloat. About 11.30 the same morning she was sighted
by Milford patrol-vessels, who boarded her and found
her stern submerged to a depth of four feet. Three Milford
drifters, the Cromorna (Sub-Lieutenant Prestridge, R.N.R.),
Ivy Green, and Marys, all vessels which had been taken up
from Scottish fishing ports, determined to try and save
CH. xi] THE " BELLGLADE " SALVED 449
her if possible. With a hundred-fathom tow rope of
three-inch wire, the Cromorna and Marys towed ahead,
the Ivy Green keeping a lookout astern for submarines,
and in this way the Bellglade succeeded in making about
4 knots. The wind was now easterly, and there was a
moderate sea. At five o'clock next morning the hawser >
parted. Efforts were made under very trying conditions
to resume the towage, but the barque listed heavily in
the trough of the sea and capsized, turning keel up. The
party which had been placed on board her managed to
scramble off and were all picked up. More could not be
done by the drifters ; but seven days later the derelict
was towed into St. Bride's Bay, where she was anchored.
[END OF VOLUME I]
INDEX
Aberdeen, course of training, 262,
265 ; vessels at, 395
ABOUKIR, H.M.S., sunk, 241, 254,
273 329
ACACIA, H.M.S., 445, 446
ACTION, H.M.S., 260
Addax, the Brixham smack, 397,
398
Aden, Gulf of, 137
Adenwen, the s.s., experience of,
299
Admiralty, relations with the Mer-
chant Navy, 227 ; directions to
shipping, 239, 415 ; policy, 241,
245 ; dispersal of ships, 243 ;
charters trawlers for mine-sweep-
ing, 260, 265, 318 ; conferences,
375, 395
Aeroplanes, German, bomb British
ships, 293-5, 404
AJAX, H.M.S., 323, 351
Alabama, the s.s., 82, 180, 213
ALARM, the destroyer, 333
Aldeburgh, 319
Alex Hastie, the trawler, sinks a
submarine, 385
Algoma, the trawler, experiments
with mine- sweeping, 258 ; size
and speed, 258 ; crew, 259
Allerton, — , skipper of the drifter
Edgar, 364
Alleyne, G. T., master of the s.s.
Farn, 162 note
Alnmouth, the trawler, 266
Alonso, the, 347
Alva, Duke of, massacres, 24
Amazon River, 140, 153
America, discovery of, 19
Amerika, the German s.s., 125
Amiens, Peace of, 46
Amiral Ganteaume, the s.s, sunk,
268, 333, 371
AMPHION, H.M.S., founders, 319
Andalusian, the s.s., sunk, 300
Anderson, — , assistant master of
the s.s. Lusitania, drowned, 419
Andes, the trawler, experiments
with mine-sweeping, 258 ; size
and speed, 258 ; crew, 259
Angle, the trawler, 317
Anstey, F. J., master of the s.s.
Branksome Chine, 290
Antelope, the Falmouth packet,
action, 60
Antifer, Cape d', 271, 303
ANTRIM, H.M.S., attacked by a
submarine, 333
Antwerp, 16 ; fall of, 198
Anvil Point, 404
Apprentices, register of, 105
Aptera, the motor-boat, 430
Aragon, the s.s., armed, 120
Araz, Mr., Governor of Chatham
Island, 183
Archangel, 22
Archdeacon, L. N., master of the
s.s. Chilkana, 198 note
ARIEL, the destroyer, sinks U12,
390
Arlanza, the s.s., released, 151
Armada, Spanish, defeat of the, 38
Arthur, George, master of the s.s.
Glanton, 166
Arucas, the German tender, 152
note
Aster, the armed yacht, 344, 430
Asturias, the hospital ship, at-
tacked by a submarine, 377
Asuncion, the German s.s., 154, 159,
160, 167
Atalanta, the s.s., attacked by a
submarine, 301 ; beached, 302
Athelstan, King, naval policy, 8,
10
Atlante, the French privateer, 60
ATTACK, the destroyer, attacked by
a submarine, 333
ATTENTIVE, H.M.S., attacked by
submarines, 330
Atternave Island, 182
AUDACIOUS, H.M.S., founders, 339,
341
451
452
INDEX
Aultbea, 378
Austria-Hungary, man-of-war in
foreign waters, 127 note
Auxiliary Patrol, vii ; organisa-
tion, 6, 255-7, 406 ; work,
329, 404 ; changes, 381 ; issue
of bomb-lances, 391 ; protection
of fishing fleets, 395 ; efficiency,
405 ; disposition of vessels, 430,
433-6 ; measures against the
submarine, 433-6 ; spirit of
the, 437
Ayesha, the s.v., capture of, 208,
209 note
Azores, the, 28
B3, British submarine, attacked,
333
Bacon, Admiral Sir Reginald, 406
Baden, the German s.s., 142, 143 ;
sunk, 185
BADGER, the destroyer, rams a sub-
marine, 276, 333
Bailhache, Mr. Justice, on the fate
of the s.s. Oriole, 279
Ballard, Rear-Admiral George, Ad-
miral of Patrols, 327, 330
Ballater, the s.s., 445
Ballycottin, 430
Baltic Fleet, 110
Baltic, the, 10; trade with, 23
Banff, 321
Bank fields, the s.s., sunk, 184
Banyers, the trawler, sunk, 365
Barbados, the trawler, 440
Barbarossa, the German s.s., 125
Bardsey Island, 375
Barfleur, Cape, 380
Barley Rig, the drifter, blown up,
322
Barlow, Admiral C. J., in command
of the steam yacht Valiant, 363 ;
in command of Larne Area, 381 ;
instructions to, 382
Barnes, — , master of the Seven
Seas, 313
Barr, H., master of the s.s. St.
Egbert, 200, 201
Barra Head, 402
Barry Dock, 448
Bartlett, F. J., master of the s.s.
Oakby, 290
Battenberg, Prince Louis of, 211 ;
see Milford Haven
Battleships and submarines, 256
Beachy Head, 47, 64, 290, 302, 385,
403 ; patrol area, 400
Beck, Sir Raymond, member of the
Committee on insurance of ships
in war, 228
Belfast, patrol, 341, 435
Bell, J. W., master of the Thordis,
damages a submarine, 292 ;
awarded the D.S.C. and made
Lieutenant R.N.R., 292
Bell Rock, 329, 395
Bellevue, the s.s., capture of, 173 ;
sunk, 174
Bellglade, the Norwegian barque,
attacked by a submarine, 448 ;
fate of, 449
Bembridge, 314
Ben Cruachan, the s.s., sunk, 277,
376
Ben Lawers, the trawler, attacks a
submarine, 404
Ben Strome, tho trawler, 390
Bengal, Bay of, 187
Bengrove, the s.s., sunk, 296
Ben-isaf, 297
Benmohr, the s.s., sunk, 198
Bennett, Henry J., master of the
s.s. Potaro, 174
Berehaven, 430, 446
Beresford, Admiral Lord, 123 ; Com-
mander-in- Chief of the Channel
Fleet, 257
Berkeley, Commander H., R.N.,
342
Berlin and Milan Decrees, 58, 67
Berlin, the German s.s., lays mines,
338 ; escapes, 341
Bernays, Lieutenant-Commander,
R.N., 363
Bernsdorff, Count von, on the
sinking of the s.s. Lusitania, 427
Berry Head, 374
BERWICK, H.M.S., 126, 171
Bestic, Albert Arthur, third officer
of the s.s. Lusitania, 418
Bethania, the German s.s., 126
Bethke, J., master of the s.s.
Cornish City, diary on board the
s.s. Rio Negro, 155-66 ; trans-
ferred to the German s.s. Crefeld,
165
Bieberstein, Baro*.* Marschall von,
at The Hague Conference, 118
Birchan, Commander, R.N.V.R.,
430
BIRMINGHAM, H.M.S., rams U15
submarine, 322
Biscay, Bay of, 10
Bishop Rock, 312
BITTERN, the destroyer, 398
BLACK PRINCE, H.M.S., 126
Black Sea Fleet, 110
INDEX
453
Blacksod Bay, 301 ; armed patrol
at, 371
Blackwood, the s.s., torpedoed, 297,
391
Blanche, the trawler, 358, 366
Blaskets Lighthouse, 316, 404
Blonde, Eugene, skipper of the
Belgian trawler Jacqueline, 432 ;
awarded a medal, 433
Blonde, the s.s., bombed by an
aeroplane, 294
Bloody Foreland, 341
Blucher, the German s.s., 127, 357
Bluebell, the fishing smack, 423, 430
Blyth, 322
Bolton, Sir Frederick, 228
Bomb lances, issue of, 391
Bond, Acting-Skipper C. C., of the
trawler Limewold, 437
Booth, Sir Alfred Allen, Chairman
of the Cunard Company, evi-
dence, 415
Boothby, Lieutenant H., R.N.R., of
the trawler Orianda, 362 ; awarded
the D.S.C., 365
Booty, Commander E. L., R.N., of
H.M.S. KING EDWARD VII, 258
Bordeaux, equips corsairs, 46
Bordelais, the privateer, 46
Bosanquet, Admiral Sir Day Hort,
210
Boston, the s.s., strikes a mine, 364
Bothnia, the s.s., 299
Boulogne, 47, 64
Bowes Castle, the s.s., sunk, 153
Bo wring, Captain Humphrey W.,
R.N., in charge of drifters, 373,
374
Boy Willie, the drifter, 392
Boyck, George R., master of the
s.s. City of Winchester, 137
Boys, The, the drifter, 386
Bradford, the trawler, 430
Branch, C., master of the barque
Crown of India, 448
Branksome Chine, the s.s., sunk,
290
Brazil, Island of, expedition in
search of, 19
Bremen, the German s.s., 124
Brenton, Captain, Naval History,
48 note, 58 note
BRESLAU, the German cruiser, 128
Brest, blockade of, 47
Bridge, Admiral Sir Cyprian A. G.,
211 ; on the protection of ship-
ping, 213
Brighton Queen, the s.s., as mine-
sweeper, 332, 361
Bristol, 13, 19
Bristol Channel, submarine in, 409
BRISTOL, H.M.S., 170, 185
British Army, 71 ; the 10th Divi-
sion of the, cross the Irish Sea,
404
British commerce, campaign
against, in the Revolutionary
and Napoleonic Wars, 44-6,
50, 57
British Corporation for the Survey
and Registry of Shipping, 95
note
British Government, reply to Ger-
many, 284
British Isles, system of patrol, 370
British Merchant Navy ; see
Merchant Navy
British Museum, gold noble of
Edward III, 15
Brock, the trawler, 430
Brooks, James, on the sinking of
the s.s. Lusitania, 418-21
Brow Head, 417, 429
Brown, Captain, R.N., Registrar-
General of Seamen, scheme of a
voluntary Naval Reserve, 106,
111; report on the register ticket,
107
Brown, C. W., master of the s.s.
Fulgent, 316 ; killed, 316
Bruges, 16
Buchan Ness, 378, 445
Bulow, the German s.s., 126
Burchart, Friedrich, Lieutenant-
Captain, of the German cruiser
DRESDEN, 141
Buresk, the s.s., 199 ; capture of,
195 ; sunk, 195 note
Burgh, Herbert de, 9
Burntisland, 330
Butler, William Henry, skipper,
on the sinking of the trawler
Japonica, 445
Butt of Lewis, 401, 447
Byron, the s.s., 168
Caborne, Commander W. F., R.N.R.,
113 ; lecture on the Royal Naval
Reserve, 113 note
Cabot, John, voyages, 19
Cabot, Sebastian, voyage, 21
Cadogan, Anthony, master of the
s.s. Vandyck, 166
Cairn Ryan, 404
Calais, 47, 64 ; loss of, 23
Calcutta, 193
Calf of Man, 290, 435
Callaghan, Admiral Sir George A.,
454
INDEX
President of the Mining Com-
mittee, 259 ; Commander-in-
Chief of the Grand Fleet, 318
Callao, 146
Cambank, the fl.s., 288 ; attacked
by a submarine, 289 ; sunk, 290
Campbell, Rear-Admiral Henry,
appointed to the Trade Division,
224 ; memorandum, 120, 225
Canada, transports from, 338
Canary Islands, 27, 244, 246
Candish, Thomas, voyages, 39
Canynges, William, fleet, 18
Cap Finisterre, the German s.s.,
124
Cap Poloni, the German s.s., 124
Cap Trafalgar, the German s.s.,
127
Cape of Good Hope, 37, 40
Cape Verde Islands, 28
Caprivi, the s.s., founders, 403
Cardiff, 13
Cardigan Bay, 435
Cargoes, insurance of, 236 ; total
value of, 236
Carmania, the s.s., 127
Carnsore Point, 430, 435, 436
Caroline Islands, 204
Carthagena, 30, 35
Carver, Captain E. C., R.N., 372,
380
Caspian Sea, 23
Cassandra, the trawler, 359
Castle of Comfort (Hawkins's ship),
28
Castlehaven, 429
Castro, the s.s., case of, 131
Cawdor, Lord, First Lord of the
Admiralty, " Statement of Ad-
miralty Policy," 113
Cawsey, E. J., master of the s.s.
Florazan, 298
Cayley, Rear- Admiral George C., 378
Ceramic, the s.s., 121
Cervantes, the s.s., sunk, 164
Ceylon, 194
Chagos Islands, 197
Chair, Rear- Admiral Sir Dudley de,
in command of the Tenth Cruiser
Squadron, 125
Chalcheford or Calshot Castle, 15
note
Challis, Captain H. J., R.N., 112
Chamberlain, Rt. Hon. Austen,
Committee on War Insurance of
Shipping, 228
Chamberlain, Rt. Hon. Joseph,
Shipping Bill, 78
Chancellor, Richard, Pilot-Major,
21 ; Arctic voyage, 21 ; at Arch-
angel, 22 ; Moscow, 22 ; wrecked,
22
Channel Fleet, 47
Channel Islands, submarines in,
374
Chapra, the s.s., 194
Charcas, the s.s., capture of, 178
Charles I, naval policy, 44
Charlton, Vice- Admiral Sir E. F. B.,
appointed Admiral of the East
Coast Mine-Sweepers, 331, 346
Chasehill, the s.s., capture of, 176
Chatham equips mine- sweeping
trawlers, 320
CHATHAM, H.M.S., 198
Chatham Island, 182, 183
CHEERFUL, the destroyer, 329
Cherbourg, 47
Cherbury, the s.s., sunk, 314
Chester, the trawler, 390
Chili, 37
Chilkana, the s.s., captured, 198 ;
sunk, 201
China, 39
Chirsit, the trawler, 440 ; fight
with a submarine, 441
Christchurch Bay, submarines in,
374
Christian, Admiral A. H., request
for trawlers, 322
Christiania, the Norske Veritas, 95
note
Churchill, Rt. Hon. Winston, First
Lord of the Admiralty, Navy
Estimates, 121-4 ; request for
drifters, 372
Cincinnati, the German s.s., 125
Cinque Ports Fleet, 9 ; defeat of
the French Armada, 9 ; continual
feuds, 10
CIRCE, H.M.S., 262, 342
City of Bremen, the s.s., sunk, 313
City of Cambridge, the s.s., attacked
by a submarine, 306-8 ; sunk,
308 note
City of Rangoon, the s.s., 192 note
City of Winchester, the s.s., cap-
tured, 137 ; sunk. 139
Clacton, the s.s., 337
Clan Grant, the s.s., sunk, 198
CLAN MACNAUGHTON, the armed
merchant cruiser, founders, 378
Clan Matheson, the s.s., captured,
192; sunk, 193
Clark-Hall, John, Registrar- General
of Seamen, 111
CLAYMOBB, the French destroyer,
299
INDEX
455
Clear, Cape, 417, 429
Clegg, Robert, master of the s.s.
Lovat, 189
Cleggan Bay, 302
Cleopatra, the trawler, 368
Clermiston, the s.s., 271
Cleveland, the German s.s., 124
Clifton, the trawler, 430
Clon, the trawler, 360
Clopet, A., master of the s.s. South-
port, 204
Clyde, the, 75 ; armed patrol at,
370, 371
Coastal patrols, new system of,
368
Coastal shipping, losses in French
wars, 62
Coasters, size of, 55
Coasting trade, 80
Coasts, ancient system of protec-
tion by contract, 17
Cochin, 201
Cocos Islands, 195 note, 203
Codling Bank, 405
" Coffin-ships," 78
Coke, Admiral Sir Charles H., 430
Colchester, the s.s., escapes from a
submarine, 272, 293
Coleby, the s.s., captured, 176 ; sunk,
177, 252
Collingwood, Admiral Lord, 59
Colomb, Sir John C. R., 210
Colomb, Vice- Admiral P. H., Essays
on Naval Defence, 68 note
Colonial Defence Committee, policy,
217-19
Columbia, the trawler, 349, 440;
attacked by a submarine, 441 ;
sunk, 441, 442
Colusa, the s.s., 177
Colva, the German s.s., 124
Colville, Admiral Hon. Sir Stanley,
355
Commerce, international, expan-
sion of, 89, 100
Comorin, Cape, 195, 201
Comoro Islands, 40
Condor, the s.s., captured, 165
Congo, the trawler, 430
Coningbeg, 417, 435
Connor, W. H., master of the s.s.
Down.«hire, 290
Conqueror, the armed yacht, 400
Conscription, result of, 4
Constance Catherine, the s.s., 315
Constantinople, report of the Bri-
tish Consul on the merchant
seamen, 102
Consuls, British, reports on the
condition of the Merchant Navy,
100-103
Convoy Acts, 52
Convoys, British, system of, 52,
215, 226, 241, 242
Conway Castle, the s.s., 145 ; cap-
tured by the German cruiser
DRESDEN, 146 ; sunk, 147
Coote, the trawler, 390
Copper Point, 416
Coquet, the trawler, 395 ; sunk,
397
COQUETTE, the destroyer, chases
submarines, 333
Corbett, Sir Julian S., vi ; Drake and
the Tudor Navy, 29 note, 31 ;
Naval Operations, 210 note ;
Official Memorandum, 66 note
Corcovado, the German s.s., 126
Cordilleras, the, 35
CORMORAN, the German gunboat,
128, 177, 188
Cornish City, the s.s., captured, 154 ;
sunk, 156
CORNWALL, H.M.S., 152
Cornwallis, Admiral, 48
Correntina, La, the s.s., sunk, 172
COSSACK, the destroyer, 388
Courage, the drifter, 373
Cradock, Admiral Sir Christopher,
153, 170
Craigforth, the s.s., 135
Crathie, the trawler, blown up, 322
Crefeld, the German s.s., 154-65
CRESSY, H.M.S., sunk, 241, 254, 273,
329
Crighton, William, master of the s.s.
Coleby, 177
Cromarty, armed patrol at, 266,
328, 335, 370 ; net-bases at, 375
Cromorna, the drifter, 448
Cromwell, Oliver, naval policy, 43,
44
Crossley, Lieutenant C. V., R.N.R.,
362
Crown of Castile, the s.s., sunk, 312
Crown of India, the barque, sunk,
448
Cruikshank, David, master of the
s.s. Flaminian, 312
"Cruiser" mine, 406
Cruiser Squadron, the Tenth, 125
Cruisers and submarines, 256
Cruisers on service, 1804-14, 59
Cubbin, John, master of the s.s.
Princess Victoria, 297
CUMBERLAND, H.M.S., 127, 152
Currey, Captain Bernard, R.N.,
Director of Naval^Ordnance, 259
456
INDEX
Customs and Excise, Board of, 242
Cutters in the Revolutionary and
Napoleonic Wars, 64
Cuxhaven, minefield, 135
D5, British submarine, founders,
346, 348
Daisy, the surveying trawler, 266
Dale, William G., master of the s.s.
Oriole, 279 ; torpedoed, 280
Dane, the trawler, 365
Daniel Stroud, the trawler, 266
Danube, the s.s., 184 note
Danzig, report of the British Consul
on the merchant seamen, 101
Dare, Admiral Sir Charles H., in
command of Milford Haven Area,
381, 435 ; instructions to, 382
Darien, Gulf of, 32, 35
Dartmouth, 13, 399
Daunt Rock Lightship, submarine
at, 431
Davidson, James, master of the
s.s. Cherbury, 314
Davies, F. J., master of the s.s.
Falaba, 309
Davies, Harry, chief engineer of
the s.s. Vosges, killed, 305
Davis, John, voyages, 39, 41
Day, E. M., master of the s.s.
Galician, report on the capture
by the German armed merchant
cruiser KAISER WILHELM DEB
GROSSE, 148-51
Declaration of London, 119, 281,
282
Defence, Imperial, Committee of,
217, 219-23, 228; report, 230-
37; "War-Book," 221
DEFIANCE, H.M.S., 260
Delmira, the s.s., attacked by a
submarine, 303 ; grounded, 304
Delta B, the trawler, sunk, 445
DENVER, the cruiser (U.S.A.), 182
Deptford, 42 ; Naval Arsenal at, 21
Depth-charge, 406
Derfflinger, the German s.s., 127,
357
Destroyers, shortage, 256
Devonia, the s.s., 332
Devonport, armed patrol at, 265,
266, 370 ; net-bases at, 375
Dewar, Captain K. G. B., R.N., 66,
68
Diane, the armed yacht, 400
Diego, a runaway slave, 35
Diego Garcia, 197
Dieppe, 64
Diligence, the drifter, 373
Dinorah, the s.s., torpedoed, 380
Diplomat, the s.s., captured, 187,
190; sunk, 191
Direction Island, 203
Dobbing, A. E., master of the s.s.
Mary Ada Short, 178
Dodd, J. C., chief engineer of the
s.s. So'ithport, 206
Dogger Bank, 345, 352, 357, 395 ;
clear from mines, 407
Domville, Lieutenant Sir James,
R.N., in command of mine-
sweeping trawlers, 343 ; of the
trawler Barbados, 440
Don, the trawler, sunk, 407
Donaldson, Captain L. A. B., R.N.,
appointed " Commander Super-
intendent of Modified Sweep-
ing," 334 ; President of the Sub-
marine Attack Committee, 368
Donovan, W. C., master of the s.s.
Exford, 200
Dorothy Gray, the mine-sweeper,
rams U18 submarine, 354, 356 ;
rewarded, 356
Doughty, Captain H. M., R.N., in
command of the Devonport Gun-
nery School, 369
Doughty, Thomas, executed, 36
Dover Cinque Port, 9, 13 ; armed
patrol at, 265, 266, 327, 335, 370 ;
drifters at, 373 ; net-bases at,
382
Dover Net Drifter Flotilla, 375
Dover Straits, British minefield,
379, 433 ; netting the, 373, 383
Dovre, the Norwegian s.s., 193
Down, Commander C. E., R.N.R.,
master of the s.s. Arlanza, 151
Downs, the, 47, 383
Downshire, the s.s., sunk, 290
DRAKE, H.M.S., 351
Drake, Sir Francis, 11 ; in com-
mand of the Judith, • 29 ;
voyages, 32-6 ; wounded, 34 ;
knighted, 37 ; reprisals on the
Spanish Indies, 38
DREADNOUGHT, H.M.S., 323 ; sinks
U29 submarine, 300 note
DRESDEN, the German cruiser, 128,
249 ; captures and sinks British
ships, 139-47, 208, 244; sunk,
147
Drifters, 255, 369 ; patrol, 320,
321 ; construction, 372 ; speed
and crew, 372 ; names, 373 ;
number, 380 ; skippers, 383 ;
work, 435
Drift-net fishing, 369
INDEX
457
Driver, the trawler, 262
Drumcliffe, the s.s., captured, 139 ;
released, 140
Drummuir, the s.v., captured, 184 ;
sunk, 185
Drunkenness in the Merchant Ser-
vice, 74, 77
DRYAD, H.M.S., 356
DUKE OF EDINBURGH, H.M.S., 198
Dulwich, the s.s., attacked by a
submarine, 288 ; sunk, 289, 380
Dungeness, 64, 279, 400
Dunkirk, 26, 47, 64
Dunmore (Waterford), 429
Durward, the s.s., captured, 275 ;
sunk, 276, 377 -
Duster, the trawler, 390
Dymchurch, 279
Eager, the drifter, 364
Eagles, J. C., master of the s.v.
Drummuir, 185
Earl of Lalhom, the s.v., sunk, 410
East Coast ports, closed to neutral
fishing-vessels, 336
East India Company, 39, 41 ; ships,
42, 48 ; size of, 54 ; tonnage, 55
East Indies, 39 ; trade with the, 40
Easter Island, 178
EBER, the German gunboat, 127,
128
Ebro, the trawler, 430
Ecuador, the s.s., 184 note
Edward I, 14
Edward III, victory of Sluys, 13 ;
sovereignty of the sea, 15 ;
commercial policy, 16
Edward IV, commercial treaties,
19
Eileen, the steam yacht, 363
Eileen Emma, the trawler, 309
Elbe River, 135
Elfland, the Belgian relief ship,
bombed by an aeroplane, 294
Elfrida, the s.s., strikes a mine, 365
Eli, the s.s., sunk, 364
Elizabeth, Queen, 18 ; accession,
23 ; foreign policy, 24, 28 ;
navy, 25 ; plot to assassinate,
32
Elizabeth, the (Wynter's ship), 37
Elizabeth, the s.s., 315
Ellis, Somers, on the capture of
the s.s. Troilus, 198-201
Ellison, Captain Alfred A., R.N.,
320, 322, 378 ; experiments with
nets, 369
Elsinore, the s.s., captured, 180
Elterwater, the s.s., founders, 360
EMDEN, the German cruiser, 128,
170, 186, 246; sinks British
ships, 187-204, 208, 247, 248;
destruction, 204
England, expansion of sea power,
43; naval supremacy, 45, 57;
privations of the lower classes,
70
English Channel, 350, 368 ; infested
by French buccaneers, 20 ; mine-
laying in the, 371 ; submarines,
374 ; defence of, 399
ENTERPRIZE, H.M.S., 57
ERNE, the destroyer, 355
ESSEX, H.M.S., 126
Esther, the trawler, 266
Estill, W. H., master of the s.s.
Royal Sceptre, saves the ship,
169
Eten, 184
Euan Mara, the motor-boat, 364
EURYALUS, H.M.S., 322
Eustace the Monk, in command of
the French Armada, 9
Evans, — , master of the s.s. Drum-
cliffe, 139
Evans, Commander E. R. G. R.,
R.N., in command of the de-
stroyer VIKING, 387
Evans, J., master of s.s. Pruth, 164
note
Evans, Jonathan, master of the
s.s. Lizzie, 303
Evans, Commander Maurice, R.N.,
401
Exford, the s.s., captured, 198, 200,
208
EXMOUTH, H.M.S., 352
Exmouth, Lord, 51
Explorer, the trawler, sunk, 445
Fair Island, 353, 404 ; Channel,
379, 436
Falaba, the s.s., attacked by a sub-
marine, 309 ; sunk, 310-12
Falkland Islands, battle of the, 185
Falmouth, net-bases at, 375 ;
patrol, 399
Fanad Point, 343
Far Cathay, 19, 22
Farn, the s.s., 165 ; captured, 162
Fame Islands, 371
Faroe Islands, 351
Farrer, Lord, memorandum on the
state of British shipping, 79
Fasnet, 416
Fecamp, 271, 289
Federal Houlders Argentine Line,
ships fitted with guns, 124
458
INDEX
Federal Steam S. Co., ships fitted
with guns, 124
Feldkirchner, Oberleutnant z. S.,
269
Fenner, Thomas, trading expedi-
tion, 28
Feria, Spanish Ambassador, 24
Fermo, the trawler, escapes from a
submarine, 402
Fidra, 329
Filey, 360
Filey Brig, 363, 365
Fisher, Admiral Sir John (Lord
Fisher), First Sea Lord, 259
Fishermen, characteristics, 398
Fishing fleet at work, 440
Fishing-vessels, patrol duty, 256 ;
sunk, 349, 394, 409, 445
Flamborough Head, 297, 331, 337 ;
minefield, 328, 357
Flaminian, the s.s., sunk, 312
Flanders, wool trade, 10; sub-
marine bases in, 272
Fleetwood, 263, 265
Fleurette, the trawler, catches mines,
378
FLIRT, the destroyer, 313
Florazan, the s.s., sunk, 298
Flying Fox, the Queenstown tender,
424, 430
Folkestone, the s.s., 337
FORMIDABLE, H.M.S., sunk, 371
Forth, Firth of, mine-sweeping
trawlers at, 265, 266 ; net-bases
at, 375
Fortune, W. C., master of the s.s.
Mobile, 314
Fowey, importance, 13
Fox, Captain Cecil, R.N., 350
Foyle, the s.s., sunk, 196
France, invasion of, in 1415, 14 ;
revolution, 44 ; capture of Bri-
tish merchant ships, 44 ; guerre
de course, 45, 58 ; tonnage of
ships, 82, 85, 87
Franco-Prussian War, 4
Fraser, James, chief engineer of
the s.s. Atalanta, 301
Fraserburgh, 321
Fraternity of the Holy Trinity,
21
Frau Minna Peter sen, German s.v.,
captured, 209 note
Frederic Franck, the s.s., 397, 398
Freesia, the trawler, 430
French Armada, defeat, 9 ; bucca-
neers infest the Channel, 20 ;
rivalry on the seas, 43 ; corsairs,
46 ; fleet, 58 ; marauding ex-
peditions, 17 ; depredations of
privateers, 63-6
Friedrich der Grosse, the German
s.s., 125
Frio, Cape, 173
Frobisher, Sir Martin, 37, 38 ;
voyages, 39
Froissart, Jean, on the battle of
Sluys, 13
Fry, Alfred C., master of the s.s.
City of Cambridge, on the attack
of a submarine, 306-8 ; pre-
sented with a watch, 308
Fryatt, Charles A., master of the
s.s. Colchester, 293 ; of the s.s.
Wrexham., 296 ; taken prisoner
and shot, 296 note
Fulgent, the s.s., sunk, 314, 316
Fyfe, T. S., master of the s.s.
Crown of Castile, 312
Galapagos Islands, 181
Galician, the s.s., captured, 148 ; re-
leased, 149
Galley, the oared, 24
Galley Head, 417, 429
Gallier, the s.s., strikes a mine, 364
Galway Bay, armed patrol at, 371
Gama, Vasco da, rounds the Cape,
19
Gare, E. G., master of the dredger
Ponrabbel, 198 note
Garland, G., skipper of the trawler
Ontario, 438
Garmo, the trawler, sunk, 363
Garnett, Lieutenant-Commander
Stuart W. H., R.N.R., in command
of s.y. Zarefah, 325, 402 ; plucky
act, 403
GARRY, the destroyer, attacks a
submarine, 354, 367
Garu, the trawler, 405
Gascanane Sound, 429
Gayer, Kapitan-Leutnant A., 418
note
Gazette, the s.s., 337
GEIER, the German gunboat, 128 ;
captures British sLips, 204, 208
Gem, the s.s., blown up, 364
General de Santos, the French
barque, 313
George V, King, tribute to the Mer-
chant Navy, 2
George, W. J., second officer of the
s.s. Harpalyce, 315
George Washington, the German s.s.,
125
Gerard, J. W., American Ambassa-
INDEX
459
dor in Berlin, on the sinking of
the s.s. Lusitania, 426 ; Four
Years in Germany, 427
Germania, the German s.s., 205
Germanischer Lloyd of Berlin, 95
note
Germany, submarine policy, v-vii,
399, 410; warfare, 54, 268-80,
285-93, 296-317, 329, 332, 371,
376, 380, 385, 395-7, 402-5,
409, 431-3, 440, 443-9 ;
tonnage of ships, 85, 87, 89 ;
preparations for war, 121 ; armed
merchant ships, 125-8 ; in-
structions to, 129 ; treatment of
British ships, 130 ; naval order,
134 ; declares war, 135 ; naval
policy, 222, 256, 323, 367 ; sub-
marines, 254, 273 ; net-cutting
device, 392 ; measures against,
433-7 ; construction of mine-
layers, 261, 266; High Sea
Fleet, 272, 357 ; memorandum
on the " War Zone," 280-83,
379, 410 ; equips trawlers for
mine-laying, 319 ; minefields,
328, 337, 346-9 ; reception of
the news of the sinking of the
s.s. Lusitania, 426
GHURKA, the destroyer, 388, 391
Giacopolo, — , master of the s.s.
Loredano, 191 ; warnings to British
shipping, 192 note
Gibbons, Captain K. C., R.N., in
charge of patrol vessels, 344
Gibson, H. J., master of the tug
Homer, 313 ; presented with a
watch, 314
Gibson, W. H., master of the s.s.
Foyle, 196 note
Gilbert, Sir Humphrey, expedition
to Newfoundland, 39
Gilbert Islands, 204
Gilgallon, Private, 301
Gladys, the s.s., 278
Glandore Harbour, 429
Glanton, the s.s., sunk, 166
GLASGOW, H.M.S., 142, 153
Glenturret, the s.s., 202 ; captured,
209
Glitra, the s.s., 241 ; captured, 269 ;
sunk, 270, 333
Glossop, Captain J. C. T., B.N., of
H.M.A.S. SYDNEY, 204
GNEISENATJ, the German cruiser,
128, 177
Gneisenau, the German s.s., 127
Goddison, F. A., chief engineer of
the s.8. Wrexham, 297
GOEBEN, the German battle-cruiser,
128
Goeben, the German s.s., 126
Golden Effort, the drifter, 373,
430
Golden Hind, the, 37
Golden / 'els, the German s.s., 139
Goodwins, submarines in the, 403
Gorleston, raid on, 337, 346, 348
Goschen, Sir E., 130
GOSHAWK, the destroyer, attacked
by a submarine, 333
Gothenburg, report of the British
Consul on the merchant sea-
men, 101
Grace, Captain H. E., R.N., in com-
mand of armed drifters, 380
Graham, Sir James, First Lord of
the Admiralty, Merchant Ser-
vice Bill, 98, 105
Grand Fleet, the, 222, 256 ; mobi-
lised, 6 ; sweep down the North
Sea, 321, 357 ; ' anchored in
Lough Swilly, 339 ; at sea, 354
Grangemouth, 269
Granton, 265 ; base for trawlers,
335, 350 ; armed patrol at, 370
Graphic, the s.s., escapes from a
submarine, 276, 278
Gravelines, 38
Gravesend, 20
Gray, J. R., master of the s.s.
Indian Prince, 171
Gray, Thomas (Board of Trade),
on the condition of the Mercan-
tile Marine, 75 note
Great Britain, tonnage of steam-
vessels, 85, 87, 88-94; declares
war against Germany, 135
Great Orme's Head, 435
Green, John R., master of the s.s.
Vosges, attacked by a submarine,
304-6; awarded the D.S.O.,
306
Green Book, the, 94
Greene, Francis, master of the s.s.
Tokomaru, 278
Gresham, Sir Thomas, Ambassador
at Antwerp, 25
Greta, the armed yacht, 344, 430
Grey, Sir Edward, dispatches from,
130, 131
Grimsby, 265 ; recruiting for the
Trawler Reserve, 262
Gris Nez, Cape, 380
Grisnez, the fishing-vessel, sunk,
391
Grosser Kurfurst, the German s.s.,
125
460
INDEX
Gryfevale, the s.s., captured, 195 ;
released, 197, 247
Guadaloupe, the French s.s., cap-
tured, 176
Guayaquil, Gulf of, 184
Gueran, Spanish Ambassador, 25
Gull Lightship, hydrophone in-
stalled, 434
Gull, the trawler, 446
Haddock, Captain H. J., R.N.R., 2
Hague, The, Conferences, 118, 120,
122
Hakluyt, Richard, 21, 27 note, 40
HALCYON, H.M.S., 320, 348
Hallaniya, Bay of, 138
Hallett, Petty Officer A. H., 442 ;
awarded the D.S.M., 443
Hamburg, British merchant ships
detained, 130
HAMPSHIBE, H.M.S., 198, 201
Hankey, Lieut.-Col. Sir M. P. A.,
Secretary of the Committee on
insurance of ships in war, 228
Hannan, F. S., master of the s.s.
Tamar, 176
Hanseatic League, 16 ; decline, 19
Harbours, 74, 76
Harpalion, the s.s., sunk, 291
Harpalyce, the s.s., sunk, 314, 315
Harris, David, master of the s.s.
King Lud, 194
Harris, William, master of the s.s.
Clan Maiheson, on his capture,
192
Hartdale, the s.s., sunk, 301
Hartland Point, 435
Hartlepool, bombardment of, 357
Hartnoll,Lieutenant H. J.,R.N., 442
Harwich, mine-sweeping trawler at,
266 ; net-bases at, 375
Havana, sacked, 26
Havre, 47, 270, 279, 289
Hawk, the trawler, 446
HAWKE, H.M.S., sunk, 273, 333
Hawkins, John, voyages, 26-32;
fight at San Juan de Ulua, 30-32
Hawthorne, Lieutenant-Commander
W. H., R.N., 440 ; drowned, 442
Headlands, the s.s., sunk, 299, 300
Hebrides, the, 351
Hector, the trawler, 395 ; sunk, 397
Hefford, — , second officer of the
s.s. Lusitania, drowned, 417
Heggie, D. W., master of the s.s.
Ben Cruachan, 277
Heligoland, 352
Hellenic, the trawler, blown up, 407
Helsor, the German s.s., 124
Hemisphere, the s.s., captured, 174
Henry IV, 18
Henry V, 17 ; invasion of France,
14
Henry VI, 17
Henry VIII, establishment of the
Royal Navy, 20 ; the Great
Harry, 20 ; fleet, 20, 25 ; mea-
sures of defence, 20
HERMES, H.M.S., torpedoed, 334,
371
Heron, the trawler, 430
Hersilia, the armed yacht, 341
Hersing, Kapitan-Leutnant Otto,
in command of U21, 270, 277,
376
Heve, Cape la, 270, 289
Highland Brae, the s.s., captured,
175
Highland Hope, the s.s., sunk, 154
Hilda and Ernest, the drifter, 364
Hill, Sir Maurice, 238
Hill, Sir Norman, member of the
Committee on insurance of ships
in war, 228, 231, 238
Hill, R. H., master of the s.s.
Holmwood, 143
Hirose, the trawler, attacked by a
submarine, 444 ; sunk, 445
Hoffnung, the s.s. (Indrani), 154,
160
HOGUE, H.M.S., sunk, 241, 254,
273, 329
Holger, the s.s., 174, 176
Holland, Hook of, 272, 276
Holland, rivalry on the seas, 43 ;
tonnage of ships, 82 ; merchant
traffic with, suspended, 407
Holmwood, the s.s., sunk, 143
Holton, E. J., master of the s.s.
Cervantes, 164 note
Holyhead, 404 ; to Kingstown
service, suspended, 376
Homer, the tug, attacked by a sub-
marine, 313
Hood Island, 182
Hood, Rear-Admiral the Hon.
Horace L. A., appointed in com-
mand of the Do . er Patrol, 334 ;
experiments on indicator nets,
373 ; on the sinking of U8
submarine, 389
Hopkins, Admiral Sir John O., 211
Hore, W. A. W., master of the s.s.
Ptarmigan, 314
Home, John, master of the s.s.
Hyndford, 302
Hospital carriers, 6
Hostilius, the s.s., 139, 140
INDEX
461
Hotham, Captain Alan, R.N., 226
Howe, E., master of the s.s. Bowes
Castle, 153
Hoxa Head, 354
Hoy Sound, 351
Huelva, 289
Hull, 263, 265
Humber, the, armed patrol at, 266,
320, 328, 370 ; minefield, 322,
328 ; shipping in, 363
Hume, Joseph, on the Merchant
Navy, 76, 84
Humphreys, Sub-Lieutenant C. C.,
R.N.R., in command of the
trawler Yokohama, 447
Hundred Years' War, 4, 13
Hunter, J. A., master of the s.s.
Dulwich, 289
Hurstdale, the s.s., captured, 166
Hyades, the s.s., sunk, 142
Hydrophones, use of, 434
Hyndford, the s.s., attacked by a
submarine, 302
Hythe, number of ships, 13
Hythe, the s.s., 337
Ikaria, the s.s., sunk, 278, 279
Ilex, the armed yacht, 341
ILTIS, the German gunboat, 128
Imperator, the German s.s., 124
Imperialist, the fishing- vessel, sunk,
328
Impressment, system of, 55-7, 97,
99 ; unpopularity, 98
Ina Williams, the trawler, attacked
by a submarine, 446
Inchcape, Lord, member of the
Committee on insurance of ships
in war, 228
Inchgarvie, 381
Inchkeith, 329
Indian City, the s.s., sunk, 299, 300
Indian Empire, the trawler, 430
Indian Prince, the s.s., 421 ; cap-
tured, 171 ; sunk, 172
Indicator nets, use of, 369 ; ex-
periments with, 374 ; working
the, 383 ; number lost, 383
Indrani, the s.s., captured, 155, 160 ;
sunk, 208
Indus, the s.s., sunk, 188, 189
Ingham, John, master of the s.s.
Bank fields, 184
Inglefield, Admiral Sir Edward
E. F., 224
Inglefield, Admiral Sir Frederick S.,
President of the Motor-Boat
Reserve Committee, 326
Inishtrahull, 343, 402
Inishturk Island, 301
Insurance Clubs or Associations,
228-39 ; forms of policy, 238
Inrercoe, the s.v., sunk, 178
Invergyle, the s.s., sunk, 299
lona Island, 341
Ireland, mine-sweeping, 341-4 ;
submarines, 429
Irish Sea, 266, 344, 383 ; sub-
marines in the, 375, 403, 409 ;
patrol, 435
IRON DUKE, H.M.S., 323, 353
Iron ships, 73, 95
Isdale, John, master of the s.s.
Ribera, 196 note
Isis, the armed yacht, 341
Isle of Man, the patrol-boat, 291
Isle of Wight, 14, 47
Italy, tonnage of ships, 85, 87
Itolo, the German s.s., 127
Itonus, the s.s., 192 note
Iversen, Iver, master of the s.s.
Bellevue, 173
Ivy Greeny the drifter, 448
Jackdaw, the trawler, 368
Jackson, Rt. Hon. F. Huth, mem-
ber of the Committee on insur-
ance of ships in war, 228
Jacqueline, the Belgian trawler, 432
JAGUAR, the German gunboat, 128
Janus, the trawler, 266
Japan, tonnage of ships, 85, 87
Japonica, the trawler, sunk, 445
JASON, H.M.S., 262, 343, 401
Jasper, the trawler, 266
Java, 41
Javelin, the trawler, 266
Jeanette, the armed yacht, 381, 435
Jeannies, the drifter, 393
Jellicoe, Admiral Sir John (Lord
Jellicoe), 320 ; on the employ-
ment of armed trawlers, 324,
330 ; demand for trawlers, 334,
401 ; for Fleet sweepers, 337
Jenkinson, Anthony, mission to
Persia, 23
John Company, 41
Johnson, Captain C. D., R.N., 388
Johnston, L. A., master of the s.s.
Olitra, 269
Johnstone, George, master of the
s.s. Rio Ignassu, 156
Jones, Arthur, master of the s.s.
Lynrowan, 163 note
Jones, A. R., first officer of the s.s.
Lusitania, 417 ; rescues passen-
gers, 423
462
INDEX
Jones, C. H., master of the s.s.
Nyanga, 152
Jones, C. H., Registrar-General of
Seamen, 111
Jones, H., master of the s.s. Glen-
turret, 202
Jones, Captain Harry, R.N., 224
Jones, James, master of the s.s.
Hostilius, 141
Jones, Richard, master of the s.s.
Hemisphere, 174
Journal of Royal United Service
Institution, 58 note, 66 note, 68
Juan Fernandez Island, 145
Julia, the, 430
Kabinga, the s.s., captured, 188,
P» 190 ; released, 192
Kaipara, the s.s., sunk, 151
KAISER WILHELM DEB, GROSSE, the
German armed merchant cruiser,
126 ; captures and sinks British
ships, 147, 151, 152, 208, 244;
releases the s.s. Galician, 149-
51
Kaiser Wilhelm II, the German s.s.,
125 ; gun mountings, 121
Kaiserin Auguste Victoria, the Ger-
man s.s., 124
KAISEEIN ELIZABETH, the Austro-
Hungarian cruiser, 127 note
KANGAROO, the destroyer, 388
KARLSRUHE, the German cruiser,
126, 128, 152 ; captures and
sinks British ships, 153-69, 170,
208, 244, 246, 248
Katharine Park, the s.s., 143
Kelway, Lieutenant-Commander
W. E., R.N.R., 305
Kersley, Sub- Lieutenant L. W.,
R.N.R., 440
Kidd, R. H., master of the s.s.
Chasehill, 176
Kiehne, H. H., master of the s.s.
William P. Frye, 179
Kigoma, the German s.s., 124
Kilcoan, the s.s., captured, 277 ;
sunk, 278, 376
Kildalton, the s.v., sunk, 178,
Killin, the s.s., sunk, 188, 190
KING EDWARD VII, H.M.S., 257
King Lud, the s.s., sunk, 196
King, W. J., master of the s.v.
Invercoe, 178
Kingstown, 404
Kinnaird Head, 321, 371, 378
Kinneir, Douglas R., master of the
s.s. Ortega, 144 ; skill, 145
Kinsale, 430
Kirkwall, 379
Kleist, the German s.s., 126
Kolbe, Oberleutnant, 276
Kdnig Albert, the German s.s., 126
Konig Friedrich August, the Ger-
man s.s., 124
KONIGIN LUISE, the German mine-
layer, 124 ; lays mines, 136, 319,
328 ; sunk, 319
KONIGSBERG, the German cruiser,
126, 128 ; captures and sinks
British ships, 137-9, 208, 244
KRONPRINZ WILHELM, the German
armed merchant cruiser, 126,
170, 249 ; sinks British ships,
171-7, 208, 252 ; interned, 177
Kronprinzessin, the German s.s., 125
Kusaie Island, 204
Labadie Bank, 443
Labrador, 19
Ladd, W. H., master of the s.s.
Adenwen, 299
Laertes, the s.s., 401 ; chased by a
submarine, 286-8, 292, 380
La Hogue, Cape, 304
Lament, A., master of the s.s.
Olivine, 313
Lamorna Cove, 392
Lancaster, James, voyages, 40, 41
Lancefield, William, master of the
s.s. Delmira, 303
Land's End, 298, 404=
Lame, 339
Lauriat, Charles E., 421
Lawrence, F., master of the s.s.
Colchester, 272
LEDA, the gunboat, attacked by a
submarine, 333
Leinster, the s.s., sunk, 376
LEIPZIG, the German cruiser, 128 ;
captures British ships, 180-85,
208
Le Marchant, Vice- Admiral E. R., in
command of Kingstown area,
381 ; instructions to, 382
Lemvin, Cape, 197
LEONIDAS, the destroyer, 441
LEOPARD, the destroyer, 348
Lepanto, Bay of, 24
Lerwick, 436
Leslie, N., master of the s.s. Clan
Grant, 198
Lestris, the s.s., bombed by an aero-
plane, 294
Letters of marque, 14-16
Levant, the, 10
Leveson, Vice- Admiral Sir A. C.,
INDEX
463
head of the Operations Division
of the War Staff, 250
Lighthouses and Trinity House, 76
Lily Oak, the drifter, 392
Limewold, the trawler, fight with a
submarine, 437, 446
Linaria, the s.s., founders, 365
Linda Blanche, the s.s., sunk, 277,
376
Lindley, Arthur, member of the
Committee on insurance of ships
in war, 228
Liners and tramps, in the British
Mercantile Marine, 87
Linsdell, the drifter, sunk, 328
Lisbon, the commercial depot for
Western Europe, 19
LIVELY, the destroyer, 348
Liverpool, 13, 289 ; number of
privateers, 45 ; Underwriters'
Registry for Iron Vessels, 95
note ; work of the tugs, 340 ;
armed patrol at, 370
Lizard, the, 392, 399
Lizzie, the s.s., 303
Lloyd's Register of British and
Foreign Shipping, 94-7 ; " ships'
lists," 94
Loch Ewe, 322, 333 ; armed patrol
at, 327, 335, 341, 351, 370
Loch Indail, 340
Loch Shell, 341
Lockivood, the s.s., sunk, 313
London, measures of defence, 20 ;
the trading centre of the world,
63 ; Naval Conference in, 118,
122
London Trader, the s.s., 279
Long, — , master of the s.s. Troilus,
199
Longcraig Pier, 381
Longhope, 379
Looe, 13, 399
Loredano, the Italian s.s., 191
Lorna, the armed yacht, 340
Lorton, the Peruvian barque, 147
Lossiemouth, 369
Lotusmere, the s.s., 192 note
Lough Larne, armed patrol at, 370 ;
net-bases at, 382
Lough Swilly, minefield, 339 ;
armed patrol at, 370
Lovat, the s.s., sunk, 188, 189
Lowestoft, 320
Lowry, Admiral Sir Robert, 319,
330, 390
LUCHS, the German gunboat, 128,
177
Lucida, the trawler, 430
31
Liidecke, Captain (DRESDEN), 140
Lugg, Herbert, master of s.s. Head-
lands, 300
Lundy Island, 435, 444
Luneda, the trawler, 430
Lusitania, the s.s., 123 ; sunk,
410-27 ; construction and cost
411 ; rumours of attack, 412
cargo, 413, 414 ; voyage
414-18; torpedoed, 418-21
" S.O.S." signal, 430 ; rescue of
passengers, 430
Lydia, the s.s., captured, 163 ;
sunk, 164
Lynns Point, 289
Lynton Orange, the s.s., 139, 140
LYNX, the destroyer, 333, 337
LYSANDEB, the destroyer, 401
Maas lightship, 276
McKenna, Rt. Hon. Reginald, First
Lord of the Admiralty, 115, 260
Mackey, — , first mate of the s.s.
Atalanta, 301
MacLarnon, J., master of the s.s.
Atalanta, 301
Madras Harbour, attack on oil-
tanks, 193
Magellan Straits, 36, 39, 144
Mahan, Admiral, Naval Strategy,
extracts from, 3, 4, 5 ; Influence
of Sea Power on the French Revo-
lution, 51, 65 note, 66 note, 67
note
Makalla, port of, 138
Makepeace, H., master of the s.s.
Kaipara, 151
Malacca Straits, 40
Malachite, the s.s., captured, 270 ;
sunk, 271, 368, 371, 376
Maldive Islands, 197
Malekula, 177
Malley, L., master of the s.s. Anda-
lusian, 300
Manchester Commerce, the s.s.,
sunk, 338, 341
Maneely, James, master of the s.s.
Kilcoan, 277
Manisty, Paymaster-Captain H.
Elden, R.N., Organising Manager
of Convoys 226
MAORI, the destroyer, 388
Maple Branch, the s.s., sunk, 154
Maraca Island, 153
Margaret, the trawler, 277
Margate, the trawler, 430
Maria, the Dutch s.s., captured,
155
Mariana Islands, 177
464
INDEX
Maricopa, the s.s., strikes a mine,
408
Marie, the German s.s., 180 ; sunk,
181
Marine insurance, system of, criti-
cised (1884), 79
Markomannia, the German s.s., 188
Marlvo, the s.s., stranded, 208
Marshall Islands, 177
Martin, Richard, master of the s.s.
City of Bremen, 313
Martin, Thomas, master of the s.s.
Hartdale, 301
Martin, the trawler, 390
Mary Ada Short, the s.s., sunk, 178
Mary, the trawler, strikes a mine,
349
Marynthea, the armed yacht, 381,
435
Marys, the drifter, 448
Mason, J., master of the s.s.
Strathroy, 153
Masson, Stephen, master of the s.s.
Malachite, 270
Master (Laws of Oleron), qualifica-
tions, 10 ; duties, 11 ; relations
with the crew, 11
Matthews, J. R., master of the s.s.
Newburn, 203
Mauretania, the s.s., 123, 411
Max Brock, the German s.s., 127
Maximus, the trawler, 430
May Island, 329
May Island, the trawler, 390
Mayer, Judge, judgment on the s.s.
Lusitania, 412, 414
Medusa, the armed yacht, 381, 435
Medway, the, 320
Membland, the s.s., fate of, 288
Mercantile Marine Act of 1540, 21 ;
of 1850, 111
Merchant Adventurers, Association
of, 18, 21, 22
Merchant Navy, British, forerunner
of the Royal Navy, vii ; history,
1, 8 ; tributes to, 2 ; responsi-
bilities on the outbreak of war,
6 ; growth, 71 ; report on the
condition, 73-8, 100-103; re-
forms, 79 ; progress, 80 ; per-
sonnel, 100, 116 ; measures for
protecting, 210-16 ; defence
policy, 216-23 ; relations with
the Admiralty, 227 ; War In-
surance Schemes, 228-39
Merchant seamen,campaign against,
v ; patriotism, vi, 1, 2 ; charac-
teristics, vii, 1, 2, 304 ; record
of services in wars, 7 ; actions
with privateers, 48 ; peril of
capture, 54 ; seized by the press-
gang, 55 ; General Register Office
of, 105, 107 ; register ticket,
107 ; abolished, 108 ; taken
prisoners, 131 ; antipathy to
Germans, 393
Merchant Seamen's Act of 1835,
98, 105 ; Fund, 104, 106 ; wound
up, 104 note, 108
Merchant Shipping Act of 1854,
111; of 1873, 78
Mersey, Lord, Wreck Commissioner,
judgment on the s.s. Falaba,
309-12 ; on the s.s. Lusitania,
422 ; on the conduct of the
master, 425
Methil, armed trawlers at, 335
Middlesbrough, 297
Middleton, John, Vice- Admiral, 41
Milford Haven, 263, 266; armed
patrol at, 265, 344, 370
Milford Haven, Admiral the Marquis
of, Director of Naval Intelli-
gence, 211
Milne, A. B., master of the s.s.
Blonde, 294
Minch, the, 334, 350
Mine, the " Cruiser," 406
Minefields, 267, 319, 322, 328, 337,
338, 339, 344, 345, 357, 360,
402, 406-9 ; method of de-
stroying, 259
Mines, laying of, 118, 135 ; de-
struction of, 364, 403, 407, 408
Mine-sweepers, British, 320 ; work
of the, 331, 343, 361 ; five classes
of, 401
Mine-sweeping, experiments with,
258 ; instruction, 260
Minikoi Island, 194, 196, 201
Mining Committee, 259
Minterne, the s.s., sunk, 410
Minto, D. K., master of the s.s.
Invergyle, 299
Mississippi, the, 81
Miura, the trawler, 440 ; fight
with a submarine, 441
Mizen Head, 417, i29, 446
Mobile, the s.s., sunk, 314, 401
MOHAWK, the destroyer, chase of
submarines, 333
Moltke, Count von, on wars, 4
MOLTKE, the German battle-cruiser,
357
Moltke, the German s.s., 126
MONARCH, H.M.S., 323
Moray Firth, patrol of the, 320,
350
INDEX
465
Morgenroth, Leutnant (U8), 387
Morrison, John, master of s.s.
Hyades, 142
Morton, Leslie N., rescues passen-
gers from the s.s. Lusitania, 422
Morwenna, the s.s., torpedoed, 432
Motor-Boat Reserve, 326 ; Com-
mittee, 326 ; organisation, 327
Motor-boats, 255, 325 ; launches,
255
Mounts Bay, 20
MOUSQUET, the French destroyer,
sunk, 203
Mozambique, 139
Muckle Skerry, 355
Muir, Commander H. G., R.N.R.,
of the boarding-steamer Sarnia,
398
Mull of Cantyre, 339, 340, 343
Mull of Galloway, 435
Miiller, Captain von, of the German
cruiser EMDEN, 186, 202
Murray, Sir James (Foreign Office),
report on the decline of the ship-
ping industry, 77, 103
Murrison, A., master of the s.s.
La Correntina, 172
Nagle, R. F., master of the s.s.
Niceto de Larrinaga, 163 note
Napoleon, Emperor, method of
raising an army, 3 ; exile, 44 ;
declares a blockade of Great
Britain, 58 ; defeated at Water-
loo, 71
Narcissus, the armed yacht, 381,
435
Nauru, 204
Naval and Mercantile Services, dif-
ference between, 20, 43
Naval Chronicle, 47 note, 49 note,
50 note, 64 note, 66 note
Naval Intelligence Department, 224
Navigation Acts, 16, 43 ; Laws,
72 ; repeal of the, 73, 78 ; re-
peal of the Manning clauses, 108
Navy, British Merchant ; see
Merchant Navy
Navy Estimates, 110, 121, 260
Navy, Royal, creation, vii, 1, 20 ;
system of continuous service, 3,
97, 99 ; inadequate resources,
6 ; impress service, 56
Naze, the, 334
Nebraskan, the American s.s., tor-
pedoed, 431
Neckar, the German s.s., 126
Nelson, Lord, policy, 5 ; demand
for frigates, 58 ; on the system
of registration, 98
Nelson's Strait, 144 ; navigation
of, 145
NEPTUNE, H.M.S., 344
Netherlands, the, 16 ; tonnage of
ships, 85, 87
Nets, indicator, use of, 369 ; ex-
periments with, 374 ; working
the, 383 ; number lost, 383
Nettleingham, Sub - Lieutenant,
R.N.R., 446 ; awarded the
D.S.C., 447
Neuerburg, Oberleutnant, on the
sinking of the U18, 355
Newburn, the s.s., 203
New Dawn, the drifter, 439
Newfoundland, 39
Newhaven, 47
Newmarket, the s.s., 337
Newquay, 399
NEW ZEALAND, H.M.S., 258, 324
New Zealand Shipping Co., ships
fitted with guns, 124
Niblet, the trawler, 277
Niceto de Larrinaga, the s.s., sunk,
163
Nicholson, Rear-Admiral Stuart,
bombardment of Zeebrugge, 352
Nicobar Islands, 40
NIGER, H.M.S., torpedoed, 351, 371
Night Hawk, the trawler, founders,
364
Nine Sisters, the drifter, 373
Ningchow, the s.s., escapes from a
submarine, 296
Noel, Admiral Sir Gerard H. W., 210
Nombre de Dios, expedition against,
32
Nore, the, armed patrol at, 266, 318,
370, 371 ; net-bases at, 375
Norfolk, Virginia, report of the
British Consul on the merchant
seamen, 103
Norman corsairs, activity of, 14
note
Normandy, 47
Norris, A. C., master of the s.s.
Charcas, 178
North Channel, 339 ; nets in the,
383 ; patrol, 435
North Foreland, 294, 320, 331,
337
North Keeling Island, 195 note
North Sea, 47, 266, 320, ,344,
357 ; minefields, 345, 408 ; sub-
marines in, 404, 409 ; patrol, 436
North Shields, 265 ; mine-sweep-
ing trawler at, 266
466
INDEX
North Wales, the s.s., 145 ; sunk,
146
Northern Patrol, 125
Northlands, the s.s., sunk, 313
Nor way, tonnage of ships, 82, 85, 87
NUBIAN, the destroyer, 389
NURNBERG, the German cruiser,
128
Nyanga, the s.s., sunk, 152
NYMPHE, the destroyer, strikes a
submarine, 333
Oakby, the s.s., 136 ; sunk, 291
Ocana, the fishing-vessel, founders,
359, 366
Ocean Island, 204
Oceanic II, the trawler, 446
Odell, — , skipper of the trawler
Coquet, 396
Old Head of Kinsale, 410, 417
Oleron, Laws of, 10
Olive Branch, the trawler, 390
Olivine, the s.s., sunk, 313
Ontario, the trawler, fight with a
submarine, 438
Orfordness, 63, 319
Oriana, the armed yacht, 340, 341,
342
Orianda, the trawler, blown up,
362, 365
Oriole, the s.s., fate of, 279
ORION, H.M.S., 323
Orkney Islands, 323 ; armed patrol
at, 370, 379
Oronsay, 344
Ortega, the s.s., escapes capture, 144
Osborne Stroud, the trawler, 266
Osceola, the s.s., bombed by an
aeroplane, 294
Ostend, 322 ; nets laid off, 401
Ostmark, the German s.s., 138
OTTER, the German river-gunboat,
128
Ottley, Bear- Admiral Sir Charles O.,
Director of Naval Intelligence,
224
Ousel, the s.s., bombed by an aero-
plane, 294
Outer Dowsing lightvessel, 320,
321, 322
Owen, Sir Douglas, 239
Owen, Sub-Lieutenant E. L.,
B.N.B., in command of drifters,
386
Owen, G., master of the s.s. North
Wales, 145
Paddle-steamers as mine-sweepers.
255, 332, 401, 439
Paget, Admiral Sir Alfred, in com-
mand of the steam-yacht Eileen,
363
Pandion, the s.s., bombed by an
aeroplane, 294
Para, 158, JL68
Parker, Admiral 'Sir William,
description of a convoy, 52
Parks, C. W., master of the s.v.
Wilfrid M., 175
Parsons, Lieutenant G. C., B.N., in
command of the trawler Passing,
362
Pascoe, John, 61
Passing, the trawler, strikes a
mine, 362
Patagonia, the s.s., 153
Paterson, H., master of the s.s.
Katharine Park, 143
PATHFINDER, H.M.S., sunk, 273,
329
Pearce, W., skipper of the trawler
Dane, 365
Peel 12, the, 421
Pegg, H., skipper of the trawler
Cassandra, in a naval engage-
ment, 359
Pellew, Bear-Admiral Sir Edward,
51 ; see H.M.S. EXMOUTH
Penang, 202
Pengilly, third officer of the s.s.
Falaba, 309
Pennsylvania, the German s.s., 125
Pentland Firth, 331, 350, 353
Penzance Bay, 392
Pernambuco, 142, 448 ; report of
the British Consul on the treat-
ment of the merchant seamen,
103
Peru, 37
Peterhead, armed patrols at, 321,
335, 370; rewarded, 446; net-
bases at, 375
Philip of Spain, marriage, 24 ;
seizes English vessels, 27
Philipps, Sir Owen, Chairman of
the Boyal Mail Steam Packet
Co., 120
Phillimore, Admiral Sir Augustus,
112 note
Phillimore, A., Life of Admiral Sir
William Parker, 53 note, 55 note
Phillimore, Captain B. F., 258
Phillimore, Captain V. E. B., in
charge of patrol at Falmouth,
399
Picton Island, 184
Pilcher, N. B., master of the s.s.
Indrani, 155
INDEX
467
Pilot, a defaulting, punishment of,
12
Pine Islands, 33
Piracy, practice of, in home waters,
10, 14, 26
Pisa, first English Consul at, 19
Plimsoll, Samuel, on " coffin-ships,"
78
Plymouth, 13, 29 ; patrol at, 434
Pohl, Admiral von, Chief of the Ad-
miralty Staff of the German
Navy, proclamation, 283
Pond, R. R., master of the s.s.
Highland Brae, 175
Ponrabbel, the dredger, sunk, 198
Pontoporos, the Greek s.s., cap-
tured, 189, 194
Poole, net-bases at, 375 ; patrol at,
434
Pope, the, partition of the New
World, 23
Port Mahomack, 321
Portia, the armed yacht, 390
Portland, 64 ; experiments with
mine-sweepers at, 258 ; armed
patrol, 265, 266, 370, 434; de-
mand for trawlers, 351 ; net-
bases at, 375
Porto Rico, 41
Portsmouth, 47 ; armed patrol at,
265, 266, 370 ; demand for
drifters, 351 ; net-bases at, 375
Portugal, the first maritime Power,
19
Potaro, the s.s., captured, 174 ;
looted, 175, 176 ; sunk, 208
Pratonia, the German s.s., 124
Prescott, T. R., master of the s.s.
Cambank, 289
President, The, the s.s., sunk, 314
President Grant, the s.s., 125
President Lincoln, the s.s., 125
Press-gang, methods of, 55 ; aboli-
tion, 98
Preston, Commander Lionel G.,
R.K, in charge of gunboats,
318, 361
Prestridge, Sub-Lieutenant, R.N.R. ,
448
Primo, the s.s., sunk, 271, 371, 376
Prince Edward, the paddle-steamer,
378 ; lays nets off Ostend, 401
Princess Alice, the German s.s., 127
Princess Olga, the s.s., founders,
360
Princess Victoria, the s.s., sunk,
297
Prinz Adalbert, the German s.s.,
127
PRINZ EITEL FRIEDRICH, the Ger-
man armed merchant cruiser, 126,
249 ; sinks British ships, 177-9,
208 ; interned, 179
Prinz Heinrick, the German s.s.,
127
Prinz Ludwig, the German s.s., 124
Prinz OsTcar, the German s.s., 126
Privateering, system of, legalised,
14
Privateers, French, actions against
British ships, 48-50
Prize Code, 132-4 ; procedure,
133
Progress, the trawler, 395 ; chased
by a submarine, 396 ; sunk, 396
Propert, William H., master of the
s.s. Laertes, 286 ; account of the
escape from a submarine, 286-8 ;
awarded the D.S.C. and made
Lieutenant R.N.R., 288
Prussia, tonnage of ships, 82
Prussia, the German s.s., 142
Pruth, the s.s., captured, 164 ;
sunk, 165
Ptarmigan, the s.s., sunk, 314
Purdy, S., master of the s.s. Conder,
165 note
Queen Alexandra, the drifter, 448
Queen Victoria, the paddle-steamer,
378 ; lays nets off Ostend, 401
Queenstown, armed patrol at, 266,
341, 371
RACOON, H.M.S., 66
Rajput, the s.s., 192 note
Raleigh, Sir Walter, 39
Ramsgate, 63
Rangoon, 193
Ratcliffe, J., master of the s.s.
Western Coast, 291
Rathlin Island, 382
Rattray Head, 371, 378, 436
Read, Charles, skipper of the
trawler Alonso, 347 ; gift to, 348
Recolo, the trawler, founders, 402
Record of American and Foreign
Shipping, 95 note
RECRUIT, the destroyer, torpedoed,
440
Red Boole, 94
Reform Bill of 1832, 98
Reindeer, the s.s., 337, 430
Reliance, the trawler, 430
Restango, the trawler, 430
Reverto, the trawler, 408
Revigo, the fishing- vessel, founders,
328
468
INDEX
Rhakotis, the s.s., 146
RIASAN, the Russian volunteer s.s.,
captured and renamed CORMORAN,
188 Ribera, the s.s., sunk, 196
Richard I, expedition to the Holy
Land, 9 ; last crusade, 10
RINGDOVE, H.M.S., 329
Rio de la Hacha, 29, 30
Rio Iguassu, the s.s., captured, 154,
156; sunk, 157
Rio Negro, the s.s., 154, 155, 156
Rio Parana, the s.s., sunk, 291
Rival, the drifter, attacks a sub-
marine, 391
Robeck, Admiral Sir John M. de,
scheme of organisation for the
Motor-Boat Reserve, 327
Roberts, J., of the s.s. Elsinore,
taken prisoner by the German
cruiser LEIPZIG, 180 ; trans-
ferred to the German s.s. Marie,
181-3 ; at Chatham Island,
183"; Guayaquil, 184
Robertson, Matthew, master of the
s.s. IJcaria, 279
Robertson, Neil, master of the s.s.
The President, 314
Robinson, Stanley, of the s.s. Oakby,
awarded the Bronze Medal, 291
Robinson, Thomas, master of the
s.s. Kabinga, 190, 192 note
Roburn, the drifter, 388
Rodjestvensky, Admiral, coaling
difficulties, 5
Roebuck, the s.s., 337
Romney Cinque Port, 9
Roosevelt, Theodore, on the sink-
ing of the s.s. Lusitania, 425
Rosarina, La, the s.s., chased by
a submarine, 173 note, 314
Rose, the trawler, 262
Roses, Wars of the, 13, 82 note
Ross, Sir John, Memoirs and Corre-
spondence of Admiral Lord de
Saumarez, 53 note
Ross, W. H., master of the s.s.
Trabboch, 191
Rosslare, submarine base at, 382
Rosyth, 329 ; armed patrol at, 335,
370
Row, Sir Thomas, Ambassador to
the Grand Mogul, 43
Rowe, James, History of. Flushing,
61 note
Royal Fleet Reserve, 113, 115
Royal Mail Steam Packet Co., 120 ;
ships fitted with guns, 124
Royal Naval Coast Volunteers, 112
Royal Naval Reserve, issue of
tickets, 109 ; formation of a
voluntary, 110, 111 ; history,
112 ; system of training, 114
Royal Navy; see Navy
Royal Sceptre, the s.s., 169
Royal Sovereign, the lightvessel,
290, 291
Ruby, the schooner (U.S.A.), 315
Runnelstone, 392
Runo, the s.s., sunk, 328
RUSSELL, H.M.S., 352
Russia, isolation, 7 ; tonnage of
ships, 87
Russo-Japanese War, value of
mines, 261
Rye, 41 ; Cinque Port, 9, 13 ;
ravaged by a French fleet, 17
" S90," the German destroyer, 128
Sabang, 139
Sagitta, the armed yacht, 402, 408
Sailing-vessels, crews, 53 ; - ton-
nage, 88 ; number of trading,
92 ; speed, 117
Sailors, impressment of, 12
St. Abb's Head, 322, 331, 334
St. Alban's Head, 380, 383, 400
St. Andrew, the hospital ship, at-
tacked by a submarine, 385
St. Ann's Head, 309, 443, 448
St. Bride's Bay, 449
St. Catherine's Point, 313, 380, 400
St. Egbert, the s.s., captured, 198,
200; released, 198, 202
St. George's Channel, 339 ; netted,
382
St. Go van's Lightship, 435
St. Jean de Luz, 46
St. John's Point, 435
St. Julian, port, 36
St. Malo, 47 ; siege of, 17, 18
St. Nicholas, Bay of, 22
Saint Pierre, French mine-sweeper,
279
St. Valery-en-Caux, 380
Salisbury, Earl of, appointed Com-
missioner, 17
San Antonio, 18 J
San Christoval, 207
San Juan de Ulua, 30
San Paulo, the Brazilian s.s., 168
San Wilfrido, the s.s., 135
Sandwich Cinque Port, 9, 13 ;
battle, 9
Sandy Cape, 207
Santa Isabel, the German s.s., 185 ;
sunk, 185
Sapphire, the armed yacht, 381, 435
INDEX
469
Sappho, the s.s., detained at Ham-
burg, 130
Sarba, the trawler, 430
Sarchet, J. B., of the s.s. Benmohr,
198 note
Sarepta, the drifter, 386
Sarnia,the armed boarding-steamer,
attacked by a submarine, 397
Satow, Sir Ernest, at The Hague
Conference, 118
Saumarez, Admiral Lord de, 53
Savannah, report of the British
Consul on the merchant seamen,
103
Scadaun, the drifter, 431
Scapa Flow, 322, 353 ; armed
trawlers at, 335, 349
Scarborough, raid on, 337, 357 ;
minefield, 360-66 ; free of mines,
406
Sceptre, the s.s., 168
SCHABNHORST, the German battle-
cruiser, 124, 128, 177
Schouwen Bank, 286, 333
Schwieger, Kapitan-Leutnant, in
command of U20, 410 ; sinks
the s.s. Lusitania, 418 note ; in
command of U88, 427 ; drowned,
428
Scilly Islands, 299, 400; wireless
station at St. Mary's, 400
Scotch motor fishing-boats, 350
Scott, Admiral Sir Percy, 351
Scott, Captain R. F., 224
Scott, T. H., master of the s.s.
Lochwood, 313
Sea power, influence of, 3
Seaflower, the trawler, 260, 321
Seagull, the motor-boat, 430
Seamen of the Cinque Ports, 9 ;
privileges, 9 ; period of ser-
vice, 9
Seamew, the trawler," 2 60, 321
Sedulous, the drifter, 373, 374
Selsey Bill, 47, 63
Semantha, the Norwegian barque,
sunk, 175
Semmes, Captain, 186
Senior, Sub-Lieutenant " W. A.,
R.N.R., 364
Serula, the s.s., bombed by an
aeroplane, 294
Seven Seas, the s.s., sunk, 313
Severn, the s.s., attacked by a sub-
marine, 333
SEYDLITZ, the German battle-
cruiser, 357
Seydlitz, the German s.s., 127, 185
Shannon River, 429
Sharp, J. T., master of the s.s.
Serula, 295
Sharp, W., master of the s.s. Kil-
dalton, 178
Sharpness, 448
Shaw, Savill and Albion, Ltd., ships
fitted with guns, 124
Sheerman, C. (gunner), 148
Sheerness, mine-sweeping trawler
at, 263
Shelomi, the trawler, 386
Shetlands, the, armed patrol at,
328, 350, 370, 379
Ship money, institution of, 43
Shipbuilding, 17, 42, 58, 85
Shipowners, charges against, 84 ;
policy in a naval war, 214 ; Red
Book, 94
Shipping Acts, 78, 84, 111
Shipping, Admiralty directions to,
239
Shipping and Shipbuilding, Report
of the Committee on, 85 note,
88, 89
Shipping industry, 72 ; cause of
the decline, 73-8 ; progress,
80, 84 ; records, 94 ; measures
of protection, 210, 212, 220 ;
war insurance schemes, 228 ;
instructions against detention,
246 ; issue of daily voyage
notices, 250
Shipping Intelligence Officers, ap-
pointed, 242 ; instructions,
243-5
Shipping, memorandum on the
safety, 247
Shipping, Registers of, 110 note
Ships, merchant, regulations, 10-1 3 ;
captured in the Revolutionary
and Napoleonic Wars, 44, 46, 48 ;
tonnage, 54, 68 note, 80, 82, 85-
94 ; losses, 57, 62, 66-9 ; regis-
tered during the Revolutionary
and Napoleonic Wars, 69 ;
wrecked,report of the Committee,
73, 76 ; armament of, 120 ;
fitted with guns, 124 ; detained
at Hamburg, 130; "Traffic In-
structions," 242 ; policy of dis-
persal, 242, 243 ; attacked by
submarines, 133-209, 268-80,
285-93, 296-317, 330, 333, 416-
18, 443-6 ; by aeroplanes,
293-5 ; strike mines, 328, 339,
343, 349, 359-65, 402-4, 407,
409, 410, 440
Ships of the Line, number of, 1804-
1814, 59
470
INDEX
Ship wash Lightship, 383
Shrewsbury, Earl of, appointed
Commissioner, 17
Shrovder, Lieutenant, of the Ger-
man cruiser KARLSRUHE, 154
Siamese Prince, the s.s., 143
Sidonia, Medina, defeat of, 38
Siegal, Admiral (German), 118
Sierra Cordoba, the German s.s.,
172 note
Sierra Leone, 27
Simpson, H. L., master of the s.s.
Lynton Orange, 140
Skerryvore, 343, 344
SKIPJACK, H.M.S., 343, 351, 356,
361, 362, 401
Skudesnaes, 269, 333
Slade, Admiral Sir Edmond J. W.,
Director of Naval Intelligence,
224, 259
Slavery, custom of, 26
Sloops, 64 ; mine-sweepers, 401
Sluys, Battle of, 13
Smaridge, H. S., master of the s.s.
Indus, 189
Smith, Charles, skipper of the
trawler Tubal Cain, 147
Smith, Sir H. Llewelyn, Secretary
of the Board of Trade, 238
Smith's Knoll, 345, 346, 348, 349
Smyth's Channel, 145
Snowline, E. V., skipper of the
drifter Hilda and Ernest,
gallantry, 364 ; awarded the
D.S.C., 364
Soda Island, 139
Solent, the, 255, 351
Solomon Islands, 207
Solon, the trawler, 364
Souter, John, master of the s.s.
Blackwood, 297
Southampton, ships at, 17
South Cross Sand, 348
South Goodwin Lightship, hydro-
phone installed, 434
South Goodwins, 320, 331
Southporty the s.s., escape of the,
204-9
South Sea, 36
South Stack, 404
Southwold, 319, 320; minefield,
328
Spanish Armada, defeat of the, 38
Spanish Indies, reprisals on, 38
Sparrow, the trawler, 260
Spee, Admiral von, in command
of the German Pacific Squadron,
140 ; at the Marshall Islands, 177
SPEEDWELL, H.M.S., 343
SPEEDY, the gunboat, sunk, 328
Spider, the trawler, 260
Spithead, 47, 400 ; fleet at, 20
Spreewald, the German s.s., 126
Spurn Head, 322, 347, 360, 395
Staalbierghuk, 147
Stablefold, Sub-Lieutenant A.,
R.N.R., 440
Stadt Schleswig, the German s.s.,
153
Staffa, the s.s., bombed by an aero-
plane, 294
STAG, the destroyer, 329
Star of Britain, the trawler, strikes
a mine, 362
Start Bay, 383
Staten Island, 184
Stavanger, 269
Steam-engine, 2, 4, 95 ; invention,
72
Steam- vessels, tonnage, 81, 85-7,
90-94, 236 ; average size, 87 ;
number of trading, 92-4
Steam-yachts, 255
Steel, — , master of the s.s.
Gryfevale, account of his capture,
195
Steel's Navy List, 56 note
Stephens, — , of the s.s. Lusi-
tania, drowned, 418
Stileman, Rear- Admiral Sir H. H.,
in command of Liverpool Area,
381
Store ships, 6
Stormcock, the Admiralty tug, 430
Stornoway, base at, 351, 378
Stoss, Kapitan-Leutnant, of the
U8, 387
Strathisla, the trawler, 390
Strathroy, the s.s., captured, 153 ;
sunk, 154, 159
Stromness, 379
Sturdee, Admiral Sir Doveton,
President of the Channel Fleet
Committee, 258
Sturton, Lord, appointed Commis-
sioner, 17
Styne Head, 301
Submarine Attach, Committee on,
368
Submarines, German, 212, 216,
254 ; number of, 273 ; warfare,
v, 54, 268-80, 285, 293, 296-
317, 329, 332, 371, 376, 380, 385,
395-7, 402-5, 409, 431-3, 440,
443-9; sunk, 385-91, 441,
446; net-cutting device, 392;
measures against, 433-7
Sudmark, the German s.s., 126
INDEX
471
Suffolk coast, minefield, 267, 320
SUFFOLK, H.M.S., 170
Supply of Food and Raw Material
in Time of War, Report on, 210-
16, 224, 227, 228
Surcouf, Robert, 48
Sutterton, the trawler, 402, 407
Swansea, 13
Swarte area, minefield, 403, 406
Sweden, tonnage of ships, 82, 85,
87
SWIFT, H.M.S., attacked by a sub-
marine, 333
Sybil Point, 436
SYDNEY, H.M.A.S., 204 ; sinks the
EMDEN, 195 note
Table Bay, 40
Tabor a, the German s.s., 126
Tagus Cove, 182
Tainui, the s.s., armed, 121
TAKU, the German destroyer, 128
Tamar, the s.s., sunk, 176, 252
Tangistan, the s.s., sunk, 297
Tara, the s.s., 341
Tarawa, 204
Tasman, the Dutch s.s., 208
Taylor, A. S., master of the s.s.
Northlands, 313
Taylor, F. G., master of the s.s.
Buresk, account of the EMDEN,
196-8
Tees, the, 75
Territorial Army, 2
Thames, the, 63, 321
THESEUS, H.M.S., attacked by a
submarine, 333
Thierfelder,Lieutenant-Commander,
of the German armed merchant
cruiser KRONPRINZ WILHELM, 171
Thomas W. Irvine, the s.s., blown
up, 322
Thompson, G., and Co., ships fitted
with guns, 124
Thompson, J. B., master of the s.s.
Highland Hope, 154
Thompson, R. J., master of the s.s.
Diplomat, 190
Thordis, the s.s., 385 ; damages a
submarine, 292
Thornton Ridge, 374, 440
TIGER, the German gunboat, 128,
177
Tillard, Lieutenant - Commander
, George E., R.N., 335
Tirpitz, Admiral von, on the sub-
marine policy, 274 ; approval of
the sinking of the s.s. Lusitania,
427
Tokio, the trawler, 354 ; rewarded,
356
Tokomaru, the s.s., sunk, 278
Toole, J. C., sole survivor of the
s.s. Tangistan, 298
Torbay, 47, 52
Torpedo-boat No. 13, surrounded
by mines, 322 ; No. 027, 399 ;
No. 91, attacked by torpedoes, 351
Tory Island, 40 ; minefield, 338,
378, 403, 408
Tosto, the s.s., 317
Trabboch, the s.s., sunk, 191
Trade, Board of, administration of
the Merchant Navy, 1, 227 ;
Marine Department, 78, 84, 238 ;
report on shipping, 82
Trade Division of the War Staff,
creation of the, 224 ; abolished,
225 ; reformed, 225, 226 ; in-
structions to shipowners, 243,
246, 248 ; memorandum on the
safety of British shipping, 247 ;
issue of daily voyage notices, 250
Trafalgar, victory at, 44, 57
Tramps, 87 ; value of, 88 ; rate
of steaming, 117
Trawler Flotilla, the Northern, 323,
370
Trawler Reserve, recruiting, 262
Trawler Section, regulations, 261
Trawlers, 255, 257 ; experiments
with, 258 ; chartered for mine-
sweeping, 260, 265, 318, 320 ;
scheme of mobilisation, 264 ;
number of, 260, 335, 372, 400 ;
work of the, 320, 322, 352, 361,
362, 401 ; demand for, 322, 324,
334, 342, 351 ; armed, 330, 335,
368 ; fitted with explosive sweeps,
334, 351 ; strike mines, 362 ;
methods of disguise, 443
Trendall, T. W., skipper of the
trawler Solon, awarded the
D.S.C., 364
Trevose Head, 305
Tritonia, the s.s., founders, 343
Troilus, the s.s., captured, 198-200 ;
sunk, 201
TSINGTAU, the German gunboat,
128, 205, 206
Tubal Cain, the trawler, captured,
147; sunk, 148
Tulloch, T. T., master of the s.s.
Tymeric, 194
Tupper, Admiral Sir Reginald, in
charge of Area I, 378
Turnbull, Corporal, R.A.M.C., on
German atrocity, 311
472
INDEX
Turnbull, J. S., second engineer of
the s.s. Harpalyce, 315
Turnbull Martin & Co., ship fitted
with guns, 124
Turner, W. T., master of the
s.s. Luaitania, 414 ; criticisms on,
424 ; rescued, 425
Tymeric, the s.s., 194 ; sunk, 195,
196
Tyne, the, 75, 299 ; minefield, 322,
328 ; armed patrol at, 328, 370
Tyrwhitt, Rear-Admiral Sir Regi-
nald, Bt., 346
U7, submarine, sinks British ship,
316
U8, sunk, 387, 389
U9, sinks British ships, 254, 273,
329
U12, sinks British ship, 298 ; sunk,
390
U14, sunk, 446
U15, sunk, 322
U16, sinks British ships, 380
U17, captures the s.s. Olitra, 269
U18, career, 352-4 ; rammed,
354; sunk, 355
U19, sinks British ships, 276, 377
U20, sinks British ships, 278, 410
U21, sinks British ships, 270, 271,
273, 277, 329, 368, 376
U24, sinks British ship, 371
U28, sinks British ships, 312
U29, sinks British ships, 299, 300 ;
sunk, 300 note
U30, sinks British ship, 289
U34, sinks British ships, 445
U35, sinks British ships, 448
U37, sinks British ships, 303
U88, 427 ; sunk, 428
UNDAUNTED, H.M.S., attacked by
a submarine, 380
Underwriters, Green Book, 94
United States, Merchant Navy, 81 ;
Civil War, 81 ; tonnage, 82, 85
Unity, the drifter, 438
Uxbridge, the trawler, sunk, 407
Vaaren, the s.s., founders, 360
Valiant, the armed yacht, 381, 435 ;
strikes a mine, 363
Vanduara, the s.s., fires on a sub-
marine, 376
Vandyck, the s.s., captured, 166-8
Vanilla, the trawler, torpedoed, 402
Varild, the s.s., 442
Varne Buoy, 388 ; Lightship, hy-
drophone installed, 434
VATEBLAND, the German gunboat,
128
Vaterland, the German s.s., 125
Venetia, the armed yacht, 325
Vera Cruz, 30
Verbena, the trawler, 430
VERNON, H.M.S., 258, 260
Victoria, the trawler, attacked by
a submarine, 443 ; sunk, 444
Victoria Luise, the German s.s., 124
VICTORIOUS, H.M.S., 348, 359
Vigilant, the trawler, 446
VIKING, the destroyer, 384, 387,
391
Ville de Lille, the French s.s., sunk,
380
VON DER TANN, the German battle-
cruiser, 357
Vosges, the s.s., attacked by a sub-
marine, 304-6 ; sunk, 306
Walhalla, the German s.s., 171
Walmesley, J. B., the s.v., 422
Walney Island, 375
Walters, Commander R. H., R.N.,
of the s.s. Brighton Queen, 362
War-Book,' the, 221
War Risks Insurance Clubs or Asso-
ciations, 228-39 ; forms of
policy, 238
War Risks Insurance Office, 239
War Staff, Trade Branch of the
Operations Division of the, 225,
250 ; Trade Division, 226
Ward, Francis, skipper of the
trawler Hirose, 444
Warrior, the Admiralty tug, 430
Warter Priory, the trawler, 368
Wash, the, 318
Waterloo, Battle of, 71
Watling Island, 170
Wawn, — , master of the s.s.
Harpalyce, 314
Webb, Rear-Admiral Sir Richard,
Director of the Trade Division of
the War Staff, 149 note, 225, 226
Weddigen, Otto von, 273, 300
Wedgwood, J., master of the s.s.
Willerby, 178
Wenlock, the drifter, 299
Weselly, A., wireless operator of
the s.s. Kabinga, 192 note
Western Coast, the s.s., sunk, 291
Westerwald, the German s.s., 126
West India Islands, French, 50
West Loch Tarbert, 351
Westminster, the s.s., 207
WEYMOUTH, H.M.S., 198
INDEX
473
Whincop, C. A., master of the s.s.
Primo, 271
Whitby, bombardment of, 358
White Oak, the drifter, 384
White Star Line, ships fitted with
guns, 124
Whitehead, Captain Frederic A.,
R.N., Director of Mercantile
Movements, 226
Whytehead, Lieutenant-Commander
T. B. H., R.N., 430
Wick, 321
Wicklow Head, 435
Widders, A., master of the s.s.
Harpalion, 291
Wilfrid M., the s.v., captured, 175 ;
fate of, 175
Willerby, the s.s., captured, 178
William I, incorporation of the
Cinque Ports, 9
William II, Emperor of Germany,
responsibility for the sinking of
the s.s. Lusitania, 427
William F. Frye, the s.s., sunk, 177,
Williams, J., master of the B.S.
Conway Castle, 145, 147
Williams, J., master of the s.s.
Hurstdale, 166
Williams, J., master of the s.s. Rio
Parana, 291
Williams, J., master of the s.s.
Indian City, 300
Willingdon Shoal, 400
Willoughby, Sir Hugh, Arctic voy-
age, 21 ; in Lapland, 22
Wilson, Admiral of the Fleet Sir
Arthur, 372; on the policy of
the Admiralty, 222
Wilson, Lieutenant - Commander
A. T., R.N., in command of the
armedyacht Venetia, 325
Wilson, John, skipper of the trawler
Blanche, 358
Wilson Line, ships fitted with guns,
124
Winchelsea Cinque Port, 9, 13
Wintonia, the armed yacht, 305
Wolf Rock, 313
Wood, John, master of the s.s.
Durward, 275 ; efforts to escape
a submarine, 276
Wood, Lieutenant W. H., R.N.R.,
430
Woodville, the s.s., 298
Woolwich, 41
Wrath, Cape, 350, 351
Wrexham, the s.s., escapes from a
submarine, 296
Wright, George, master of the
trawler Eileen Emma, 309
Xylopia, the trawler, 266
Yachts, requisitioned, 325, 377 ;
number of armed, 332, 372
Yarmouth, armed patrol at, 335,
370 ; net-bases at, 375
Ymuiden, 287
Yokohama, the trawler, fight with
a submarine, 447
Yorck, the German s.s., 126
Yorkshire coast, raid on, 357
Younger, A., the skipper of the
mine-sweeper Dorothy Gray, 356
Zanzibar, 40
Zarefah, the armed yacht, 325
Zeebrugge, bombardment of, 352
Zeiten, the German s.s., 126, 138
Zeppelins, raids, 404
ZHEMCHUQ, the Russian cruiser,
torpedoed, 202
Printed by Hasell, Watson & Viney, Ld.t London and Aylesbury, England.
D Kurd, (Sir) Archibald Spicer
581 The merchant navy
H7
v.1
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY