Skip to main content

Full text of "The Messages And Proclamations Of The Governors Of The State Of Missouri Volume XVI"

See other formats


r.16  cop  2 


Keep  Your  Card  in  This  Pocket 

Book*  will  b*  lwu#d  only  on  pNnwitetton  d  proper 


Unbss  tabtltd  othtrwisi,  booki  mar  bt 
far  two  w««ks,  Bmroiwri  Itodtna  boob  mtrltd,  dt* 
fsotd  or  mutiUted  art  ttptdid  to  r«poH  mtw  at 
Ubmry  dMi  o^rwitt  iht  kul  borrower  will  bt  h»l  i 
r^mi^b  tor  all  imp*H»rtK^n»  dlm»vm«d, 

bo®l§dfiwp 


^y§  oost 

bt  r 


Public  Library 

Kaoiu  Cttjr,  Mo. 


KANSAS  (-It  Y     MO    IMIUIIC  I  UW  AH  Y 

Nil-Ill  II  III  II 

D    DOD1    DBDSSBT    5 


The 
<JtCessages  and  'Proclamations 


OF  THE! 

overnors 

Of  THE 

STATE  of  MISSOURI 


COMi'ILJCl)  AND  EDITKI)  Bit 

SARAH  GUITAR 

OIK! 
FLOYD  C*  SHOEMAKER,  M,A*»  ULD, 

or  <r*ti  STATV 
Soourr  or 


VOLUME  XVI 


THE  STATE  HistoftiCAL  Soairv  or  Miiioiiiii 


COPYRIGHT  1951  BY 
THE  STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY  OF  MISSOURI 


PREFACE 


This  volume  of  'The  Messages  and  Proclamations  of  the 
Governors  of  the  State  of  Misiotm11  includes  the  massages  and 
proclamations  of  Governor  Phil  M.  Donnelly  (19454949), 

FLOYD  C,  SHOEMAKER, 
1950, 


CONTENTS— VOLUME  XVI 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY 

Page 

BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH,  By  Frank  P.  Briygs 8 

INAUGURAL  ADDRESS.    .             .  d 

FIRST  BIINNXAL  MESSAGE 21 

SECOND  BlENNUL,  MESSAGE 40 

Vmo  MUSSAGES 

To  the  Housi  of  Representatives „  #8 

To  the  Senate    ...*,.*,.,<  65 

To  the  HOUM  of  Beprenentativus       ......  78 

To  the  House  of  Repreftentatives    .......  84 

To  the  HOUBO  of  Representatives       ......  89 

To  tht  Sunatt    ,„..„..,..,  tl 

To  tht  Senate       .*..*,.*..  98 

To  thi  Senate    ...*....*.,  107 

To  the  Senate       ..........  108 

To  the  Houi©  of  R^pruwntativti .  118 

To  thi  Houfttf  of  H^prft»cntfttiv<i«       ......  118 

To  the  $m&U    ,...*....,.  181 

To  tht  Hount  of  ^pr^s«nUtivt>»  18i 

To  tht  Senate    .,.....»..*  186 

To  tht  Stimtt       ..........  187 

To  thi  Hou*o  of  Rtprttiiitatiir^   ......       .  1S8 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  SUte  142 

Veto  Reeordtd  with  the  S^cr^Ury  of  Sttte   ,       .       .      »       .  14S 

Veto  fiecorded  with  tht  Seerttary  of  Stmtt  149 

Veto  RmrordfKi  with  tint  S<KrreUry  of  State                              .  188 

To  the  Houst  of  Eepx^ttitattfei      .,,,,.  167 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Sterttarf  of  BUtt                             .  1«0 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Skerttar^  of  Stalt      ,      ,       ,      *  1«8 

Veto  l^corcbd  with  the  Sbesftary  of  Statt  .      .      ,      .      .  166 

Vtto  Rocortbd  with  tilt  Stcrttarf  of  State  1W 

Veto  B^orriW  with  the  Beerttary  dT  State                             ,  170 

Veto  Reeordbd  with  the  gtorftary  of  State  171 

Vtto  Recorded  with  the  S^rttarf  of  mate                            ,  188 

Veto  Rt^rded  with  the  teretary  of  State      t      .      ,      .  2(K> 

To  the  Senate    ..,,,.,,,,,  202 

To  the  B*riftt4       ...,,,.       .       .       *  «M 

To  tilt  Stnato    ,      .      .      .....,,.  9m 

To  th^  g^iati       ....,,.      *      .      .  SW 

To  th«  ^Bite    ..,.,,,-,,.  &08 

To  the  &matt      ...,....,.  m 


Vi  CONTENTS 

VETO  MESSAGES  —  (Continued,)  Page 

To  the  Senate    ...........  211 

To  the  .Senate       ..........  212 

To  the  Senate    ...........  214 

To  the  iSenate        ..........  217 

To  the  Senate    ......  -  218 

To  the  House  of  Representatives       .....       *  220 

To  the  Senate    ......       .....  222 

To  the  Senate       .....       .       ,       ...  224 

To  the  -Senate    ..........       *  22? 

To  the  House  of  Representatives       ,.,.,.  24$ 

To  th©  House  of  Representatives    „„,.„,,  247 

To  the  House  of  Representatives       ,,..,.  260 

To  the  House  of  Representatives    ,..*•.*  2$B 

Veto  Recorded  with  th©  Secretary  of  State       .       .       .       .  266 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State  *  268 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State       .       -       .       .  271 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State    .  278 

V^to  Recorded  with  th©  Secretary  of  State       .  275 

V^to  Raeordod  with  th©  Secretary  of  State   ,  277 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State  27B 

V^to  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State   «       ....  279 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State       .       .       .       .  281 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State   ,       .       ,       ,       .  288 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State       *       ...  286 

To  the  Senate    ...........  291 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State  2tt0 

Veto  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State  ,  300 

V^to  Recorded  with  the  Secretary  of  State       *  802 

Vato  Recorded  with  the  Sneratary  of  State  ,  805 

Veto  R0cord®d  with  the  Secretary  of  State       .  808 

Veto  Reeordud  with  the  SuertUry  of  State   .....  nil 

Veto  Recorded  with  tht  Secrtttry  of  State       .       *       ,       *  316 


SPECIAL 
To  thi 

To  the  Senate  **,.*,*,»»  817 

To  the  Stimtfi  .*.****»»»»  S18 

To  th®  Senate  »*»..«..,.  819 

To  the  Stnatt  *      ......  ,    880 

To  the  Senate  .*.,.,,,       ,       .  SSO 

To  the  Senate  .....      .,.,,*  Sil 

To  the  B^aate  ..........  881 

To  the  S&aate  ....,.,.      f      v  v   m 

To  the  Sim  ate  ,....«,.       .       .  m$ 

To  tilt  Houe©  of  R*pr$#efltAtiv*»  f  |g4 

To  the  Senate  ..........  §84 

To  the  Senate  .......      ,      .      ,  .   3SS 


CONTENTS  VH 

SPECIAL  MESSAGES — (Continued)  Page 

To  the  Senate 336 

To  the  Senate 336 

To  the  Senate 387 

To  the  Senate  .                              .  338 

To  the  Senate 338 

To  the  Senate 33& 

To  the  Senate 340 

To  the  Senate  ........*..  341 

To  the  Senate  ..........  341 

To  the  Senate 342 

To  the  Senate  ....,.„.„,  S48 

To  the  Senate 343 

To  the  Senat©  ,,.,.,,„.<,  844 

To  the  General  Aswmbiy  &nd  th«  Secretary  of  State   .       .       ,  S4S 

To  the  Senate  .                                    346 

To  the  House  of  Rtprtstntatlvt  §    .......  $47 

To  the  Sennit  ..........  848 

To  the  Bun&tn  ...........  849 

To  the  Senate  .,....,*..  350 

To  the  fifen&tn  .                                   851 

To  the  Senate  ..........  &&2 

To  the  Senate  ...........  882 

To  the  Senate  ..........  8B8 

To  the  Stn&t®  ..........  BfNi 

To  the  Senate  ..,......-  884 

To  the  Senate  ...........  866 

To  the  Senate  ..........  886 

To  the  Senate  „.,.,..,.,.  867 

To  the  Senate  ..........  &$8 

To  th#  Stnati  ...........  889 

To  thu  Senate  ....»....*  860 

T0  ttit  S«n»t«  ...........  861 

To  the  Senate  *                           ,861 

To  thu  gfeaatt  ...........  868 

T©  the  Senate  ..........  888 

T0  «i«s  Senate »64 

Ta  tht  Senate  ..........  »6§ 

To  th«  Stnutu  ...........  866 

To  th«  Senate  ,                           *  Sflt 

To  th«  Stnate  ...........  167 

To  tlie  B<jnnte  S«8 

To  the  SlMWte  ...........  869 

To  the  Senate  ..........  870 

To  ttwt  Senate  ...........  *71 

To  ttit  Senate  iTS 

To  tbe  ftmati  .       .       «       *•*....*  SH 

To  tht  S^ati  ,......«..  81* 


CONTENTS 

SPECIAL  MESSAGES— (Continued) 

To  the  Senate 

To  the  'Senate 

To  the  'Senate    .  

To  the  Senate 378 

To  the  Senate 880 

To  the  Senate        ..........  380 

To  the  Senate - &&l 

To  the  Senate .382 

To  the  Senate 382 

To  the  -Senate       ...,..«...  888 

To  the  Senate    ...........  884 

To  the  General  Assembly *  B84 

To  the  General  Asiembly       ....*..,.  SSS 

To  the  General  Assembly    ........  Sii 

To  the  Senate 388 

To  the  Senate        ,..,„.....  889 

To  the  Senate    . 880 

To  the  Senate ...  890 

To  the  Senate    * *  891 

To  the  Senate       ..........  S9I 

To  the  Senate    ...........  892 

To  the  Senate       ..........  S98 

To  the  'Senate «  $$8 

To  the  Senate       ..........  894 

To  the  Senate    ...........  895 

To  the  Senate .896 

To  the  Senate                  .........  897 

To  the  Senate       ..........  S»t 

To  the  Senate    ...........  $98 

To  the  Senate       ..........  8M 

To  the  Hotiit  of  Kepritentativin    .......  400 

To  the  Senate       ..........  401 

To  the  Senate   ,,»...„....  4QB 

To  the  Senate       ..,.,.,,,.  401 

To  the  Senate    .,*....,,.,  404 

To  the  Senate       ......       *       *       *       ,  406 

To  the  Senate    ,....,...,,  40ft 

To  the  Senate       ..........  40« 

To  the  Senate    .,...,,....  407 

To  the  Senate        ..,,,.,,,,  408 

To  the  Senate   ,„..,.,....  409 

To  the  Senate       .  .410 

To  th*  HOUJW  of  RepreeenUtiv^                                              .  41® 

To  the  Hou»e  of  Etpr«»wxtatlve«  411 

To  the  Houw  of  !Upt***ntativ*«           t       „       #       .       »       t  411 

To  the  House  of  &epm*ntatf vo»       ......  414 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       ........  41S 


CONTENTS  IX 

SPECIAL  MESSAGES — (Continued)  Page 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 416 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       .               417 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    . *  418 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       . 419 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 420 

To  the  Secretary  of  State ,421 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 422 

To  th©  Secretary  of  State 425 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ..„„'...,  426 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       „„„„.,„„  427 

To  the  Secretary  of  State ,420 

To  the  Secretary  of  State *  480 

To  the  S^crotary  of  State    »„,...»»  4S1 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       .**...».  488 

To  the  Sneratury  of  State    ...,*,..  484 

To  tha  Secretary  of  State       »..**...  486 

To  thu  0©cr«tmry  of  State    .,.,...«  4S0 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       ..».,.*.  448 

To  th«  Houio  of  Repr^ftentAtivfti       ......  445 

To  tht  Senate    *...«......  447 

To  th«  Senate       ,....*.„,.  448 

To  tht  Senate    ...........  449 

To  tht  Sanate       .       .       . ,449 

To  thi  Senate 480 

To  tht  Senate       ..........  481 

To  tto  Btnatt    ...........  451 

To  the  Senate       ..........  45S 

To  tbi  Senate    ...........  488 

To  the,  Senate       ..........  453 

To  the  Senate    »*»*,..,,**  484 
To  the  Senate       ,.,.,....,465 

To  th*  Senate    ...........  48ft 

To  tiie  fhnaie       ..........  48» 

To  the  itnate    .             .      ,      *  48T 

To  tiie  Senate       .      .      „«..,..,  488 

To  the  Senate    ........      .      *      .  48» 

To  the  Smite       .      .      ........ 

To  UNI  Smatt    .       .       .       *       *       ....,, 

To  the  Stnate       ..........  4«1 

To  th*  Smate    ...........  462 

To  th«  ff^mte       ..........  4«8 

To  th«  i^ale    .      .      .      ........  M4 

To  th0  Senate       ..........  4«ft 

To  tbi  Senate                        ........  4W 

To  tb^  Senate       .......... 

To  ^e  S^mle   »****»*.*.* 

To  the  Stnmtii       **«**,***»  4ft 


X  CONTENTS 

SPECIAL  MESSAGES—- (Continued)  Page 

To  the  Senate 460 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 470 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 471 

To  the  Secretary  of  S"tate 472 

To  the  Senate -  474 

To  the  Senate .  475 

To  the  Senate 475 

To  the  Senate .        .        .  476 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 477 

To  the  Senate        .              477 

To  the  Senate    .,....«..,,  479 

To  the  Senate        .                                     470 

To  the  Senate ,  480 

To  the  Senate       ..........  481 

To  the  Senate    ...........  481 

To  the  Senate        ...*.,.*»..  488 

To  the  Senate 4S8 

To  the  Senate                     ********  4BB 

To  the  House  of  Representatives 4S4 

To  the  General  Assembly    ..*.,...  48$ 

To  the  Senate    ,.....,.,..  488 

To  the  Senate       ..........  489 

To  the  Senate    * .  480 

To  the  Senate       ..........  400 

To  the  Sonata    ..,,.»..,.<  491 

To  the  Senate       ..........  491 

To  the  Hanata    ...........  498 

To  the  Senate       ..........  498 

To  the  Sonata    ...........  494 

To  the  Senate       ..........  494 

To  the  Senate    ...........  495 

To  the  Senate       ..........  49* 

To  the  Senate    ...,..,..,,  4t7 

To  the  Senate       ..........  4iS 

To  the  Senate    -..,,.,,.       ,       ,  4t8 

To  the  Senate       ....,.»,,.  4it 

To  the  Gintrml  Aitembly       ........  §01 

To  the  Genera!  AgtimbJy    ........  804 

To  the  Stnate    ....*..,..,  8M 

To  the  General  Assembly    .             $Qf 

To  the  Senate    .,...»».,       »       ,  fill 

To  tibe  Senate  git 

To  the  Scnatd                                                                            t  §|§ 

To  the  Houw  of  R«prw«nUttv«*       ..»,..  SIS 

To  the  Mmm  of  Ropr^enUtivet                                            .  §14 

To  the  Senate       ..........  SIS 

To  the  -fitoorttarir  of  State      ••••„...  818 


CONTENTS  XI 

SPECIAL  MESSAGES — (Continued)  Page 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    .              5-17 

To  the  Senate 618 

To  the  Senate        ..........  518 

To  the  Senate 819 

To  the  Secretary  of  State &20 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       ........  522 

To  the  Secretary  of  State 52S 

To  the  Senate    .              824 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    „              824 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       .........  525 

To  the  Senate .       ....  528 

To  the  Senate »       „  528 

To  tho  Senate        ..........  529 

To  the  Senate    .                       580 

To  thu  Senate        .,„,......  580 

To  the  Sanato    . ...  581 

To  tho  Senate        .               S«^ 

To  the  Senate    ...........  582 

To  the  Bonntu               .........  588 

To  the  Senate    , •  584 

To  the  Kenate        ..........  686 

To  the  Senate    .....„.*..•  688 

To  Ihw  Senate        ....„..„,.  887 

To  th«  Senate    ,,,„*„.*..•  687 

To  th*  General  Aaaembty    »*,«****  88S 

Ta  the  Gtenato 547 

To  th«  8«nato       *                     648 

To  the  Senate    ...........  548 

To  th«  Bsn&tt        *»,.......  649 

To  the  8«nate    ...........  660 

To  the  Benftte       ..........  861 

Ta  the  Banatt    ...,*,....•  W2 

To  th«  ^n»tt       ..........  868 

To  th«  B^nal®    ...........  864 

To  th«  Bitnutu  5S4 

Tn  tbn  Sartftl*                                                                            *  688 

To  thu  Senate       ...........  5B« 

To  the  Banate    ...........  888 

To  tb«  Semite       ..........  887 

To  the  Huuwo  of  t^prfj*fnUtiv^»    .,,,...  58S 

To  tilt  Stnate       ,,..,.....  880 

To  thi  Senate    ...........  W 

To  th«  HottM  of  RtprmMmUtftvM       ,,..,.  881 

To  tlm  Btnite    ...........  881 

T0  tht  Semite       ..........  *84 

To  tht  Sti»»tt    ...........  Ml 

To  tilt  Hou»*>  of  R^pre^nUtivw  8M 


Xii  CONTENTS 

SPECIAL  M.ESSAGE&~(Continued)  Page 

To  the  House  of  Representatives    .......  566 

To  the  House  of  Representatives        ......  507 

To  the  House  of  Representatives    .......  568 

To  the  House  of  Representatives       ......  569 

To  the  Senate    .....       ......  570 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ........  570 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       ........  572 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ........  578 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       .....       .  574 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ,.,*.„.„  575 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       ........  576 

To  the  Senate        ,.*....„„«  577 

To  the  Secretary  of  State       .....       *  577 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ........  578 

To  th©  Secretary  of  State                                                          .  570 

To  th©  Secretary  of  State    .,.,.„,,  580 
To  the  Secretary  of  Stat®       ,       »       .       ,       «       *       ,       ,581 

To  the  Secretary  of  State    ..*..,..  688 

To  the  Senate    .........       .  585 

To  th©  Senate       ..........  58$ 

To  the  Senate    ...       *       ....*,,  686 

To  the  Senate       ......,,..  687 

To  th©  Senat©    „........,,  §88 

To  the  Sanat®       *.,....,,.  688 

To  the  Senate    ...,».,,,.,  689 

To  th©  Senate       ..*...*«..  WO 

To  the  Senata    »                            .......  50! 

To  th©  Senate       ..........  691 

To  th©  San&tit    ,       .       ......       ,       .       .  692 

To  the  Senate       ..........  693 

To  the  Sinak    ,..„.,..,..  693 

To  the  Stnate       ..........  694 

To  the  Senate    »*.,...,,„,  B95 

To  the  Htnafce       «**.*...«.  6M 


MiM0ltAND4  OF  PlIOCLAMAf  IONi  &N0  Wftlf  »  Of 

January  SB,  1046       .•,.* 
January  ii»  1945   *..«...,..       B9T 
Felm*a*y  lf  1048       •**>.«•«.       f    B97 
ilawh  7,  UMft       ..........       HT 

March  8f  19«    .       .       .....       .       #       .       t    598 

Mi^eli  Ut»  1941      ..........       IM 

Mnroh  i%  194$         ..........    598 

Apfl  4,  1«N»         **»*».»,,*       IMW 
Aprfl  «f  1S«|     ...... 

A$rfl  18t  1948       , 

Aprtt  18,  1948    .»-.... 


CONTENTS  XUl 
MlMOBANDA  OP  PROCLAMATIONS  AND  WRITS  OF 

EU&CTXON  —  (Continued)  Page 

April  19,  1946        .               ......  609 

April  20,  1946    ...........  600 

April  21,  1945        ......       .       .       ,       .  .  600 

April  27,  1946    ...........  000 

April  28,  1945        ..........  600 

May  4»  1946       .....       *       .....  600 

May  7,  1946    ..........       ,601 

May  8,  1946       .       ..........  601 

May  12,  1945        ..........  mi 

May  19t  1946    .......       ....  601 

May  21,  1946        ..........  601 

May  28,  1945    ...........  602 

June  6,  1945    .                      ........  602 

June  14,  1946     ...........  602 

July  2$»  1945        .                                     .....  602 

July  20,  1946     ...........  602 

July  80,  1945        ...........  608 

Aujrw»t  7»  1946    .               .....        ....  608 

Auguit  14,  1945    ..........  608 

Atiguet  14,  1945        ..........  608 

Attjrunt  21,  194S    ..........  60S 

2,  t$4fi    .       ,       .       .       .       *       *       *       .       ,608 

8,  1946        .........  604 

ll»  1948    .....                           „      .  8M 

IB,  1045       ......,.,  604 

18,  1946    ,,.....,..  W4 

.       ,       ,  604 


Ocitobtr  1,  1148    ..........  60S 

I,  1148        ..........  608 

18,  194S    ..........  MB 

Nmrtmbtr  7,  1&48    ..........  60S 

18*  1948       .........  606 

18,  1»45    ..........  606 

i§,  1»4»       .........  606 

S#  104i      **.«**»*»*  6W 


March  8»  1046    ......  *       .  6M 

M^rth  IS,  Ii4i     .       .........  6M 

March  23,  1046  ......  8®ft 

Mftfth  Mv  iMW    ..........  007 

April  lf  1946    ...........  607 

April  I9  1»*S        ..........  <07 


April  If,  1940       ..........       «®t 


XIV  CONTENTS 

MEMORANDA  OP  PROCLAMATIONS  AND  WBITS  OF 
EO3CTION — (Continued) 

April  22,  1946 .       .       .       .  608 

May  2,    1946 608 

May    6,    1946 608 

May  10,  1946 609 

May  10,  1946 600 

June  14,  1946 .609 

July  26,   1946 609 

September  16,  1946   ..........  609 

September  20,  1946       .........  609 

September  23,  1946    ..........  610 

September  26,  1946       .........  610 

September  80,  1046   ..........  610 

October  11,  1946 610 

October  28,  1946 .  610 

November  6,  1946        .                     611 

November  26,  1946    ..........  611 

November  27,  1946       .........  611 

December  23,  1946    *»......,,  611 

January  81,  1947        .,.,.,...  811 
February  6,   1947     *       *       .       *       *       *       .       .       .       .612 

February  7,  1047        .........  812 

February  7,  1047    ..«•..,,,,  612 

February  8t  1047        .........  612 

February  11,  1947    ...»....,,  612 

February  19,  1947 613 

March  81,  1947        ..........  818 

April  4,  1047        ..........  618 

April  19,  1947    .....,,..,,  818 

April  lft»  1047       .,.,.,..,.  618 

May  10,  1047 .       .       .  614 

May  17,  1947        ..........  814 

May  21,  1947    .*...,...„,  814 

Mmy  20,  1147        .*„,,..,.,  814 

Junt  8,   1047     .,,,.,,.,,  $14 

Jurat  11,  1947       ......„,,,  618 

•July  81,  1P47    ..,,,.,„..,  818 

S«ptemtw  11,  1947       ..,,,..,,  iiS 

Btpttmbtr  15f  Ii47                                                                  ,  «lg 

Stpttmbtr  18,  1947       ......       ,       ,       ,  616 

fift pttmbtr  24, 1947  .«..,,..      .       t  «18 

Sipttmbtr  80,  194f      ....»,..       t  §18 

SiptiaAtt  mt  1947   ..........  816 

CteWbtr  9P  1947 *       t       »  116 

Oetob«r  18,  194?       **.,.*»      .      ,      ,  818 

#  1947  .      .      „       t      t       f      # 

U,  IMI    ,........ 


CONTENTS  XV 

MEMORANDA  OF  PBOOUAMATIONS  AND  WRITS  OP 

EJECTION-— (Continued)  Page 

February  28,  1948 617 

March  80,   1048        ,               617 

April  2,  1948 617 

April  10,  1948 617 

April  21,  1948 617 

April  29,  1948 *  618 

May   6,    1948 618 

May  10,  1948 618 

May  14,  1948        ..........  618 

May  21,  1948    ...........  618 

May  28,  1948        *.»..„....  619 

Attest  2&,  1948        .       .       . .  619 

Btptumber  3,  1948        .........  619 

Suptumbw  14,  1948 619 

September  22,  1948       .„«,...,.  619 

a^pttmbar  22f  1948    ...*...,,,  620 

October  1,  1048     ..........  620 

Octobtr  I,  1048 *  620 

October  4,  1948     ,„.„,,.,,»  620 

Oetab^r  16,  1948        .,...,...,  621 

Oetobtr  18,  1048    ..«....,.,  621 

October  iS,  1948        ..........  621 

Nov«mbar  10,  1948       ....,.,..  621 

Nwtmbtr  10,  1048    ..........  621 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY 


I'HIt    M     I)M\M  I  !  V 


PHIL  M.  DONNELLY 

BY 
FEANK  P»  BBIGOS 

Phil  ML  Donnelly,  forty-first  governor  of  the  State  of 
Missouri,  lawyer,  statesman*  and  business  leader,  was  born  in 
Lebanon*  Lacledo  County,  Missouri,  on  March  6»  1891,  the 
son  of  Phil  and  Margaret  (Halloran)  Donnelly. 

Ha  attended  the  public  schools  at  Lebanon  and  was 
graduated  from  the  Lebanon  high  school  in  1909.  In  the  fall 
of  thai  year  he  entered  St  Louis  University  to  study  law, 
that  having  bean  his  ideal  from  hia  early  youth.  In  four 
years  ha  had  completed  the  course  and  was  graduated  in  1913. 

After  taking  the  bar  examinations  and  being  admitted 
to  practice  law  in  Missouri,  Mr.  Donnelly  returned  to  his 
native*  county*  Laclede,  and  there  entered  a  partnership  with 
jf,  W.  Karris,  which  partnership  continued  until  Mr*  Parns* 
death. 

1 1  in  early  practice  of  the  law  paralleled  that  which  many 
young  lawyers  face  today,  While  its  calls  were  many*  its  reeom- 
pease  was  not  so  larga  and  his  shingle  was  fairly  well  nailed  to 
the  wall  bafor©  his  reputation  as  a  **g©od  lawyer**  spread 
throughout  the  area  of  Laelade  and  adjoining  counties*  In 
the  law,  as  in  other  ventures*  however,  Mr,  Donnelly's  alert 
and  kean  mind  §000  bmmme  evident  and  hm  clientele  grew 
until  it  is  now  one  of  tha  largest  in  the  State. 

On  May  22,  1915,  Mr*  Donnelly  was  united  in  marriage 
with  MiM  Juiiaiti  MoFaddcm,  a  native  of  Ptdueah*  Ken* 
tuoky,  who  was  then  living  in  Maptowood.  She  ii  tha  daughter 
of  K.  M,  md  Zilpah  MePadden.  One  ton*  Phillip  David*  who 
i§  now  a  taw  partner  of  his  father,  was  bora  to  this  union, 

Soon  after  entering  legal  practice  in  Laelada  County,  Mr. 
Donnelly  also  beoama  interested  in  polities.  Hit  native  county 
WM  Republican*  but  hi  btiitvsd  in  the  principles  0!  the  Demo* 
crutto  Party  and  it  was  with  thai  party  that  he  made  aftU 
He  was  flnl  eltelad  city  attorney  of  lx$hsmoa>  a  post  ht 


4  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

for  several  years  by  reelection,  and  served  one  term  as  prose- 
cuting attorney  of  Laclede  County.  In  the  fall  of  1922,  he 
was  elected  by  Laclede  County  as  its  representative  in  the 
Missouri  General  Assembly  and  two  years  later  he  was  "sent 
over  the  corridor"  to  the  State  Senate,  where  he  promptly 
made  a  name  for  himself  as  a  parliamentarian  and  legislative 
leader.  In  the  next  five  years  he  was  honored  with  every  post 
of  honor  his  fellow  senators  could  bestow  on  him- 

Senator  Donnelly  was  chairman  of  two  different  commis- 
sions to  revise  the  Missouri  statutes,  one  in  1929  and  the 
other  in  1939,  His  work  on  both  commissions  bespoke  apt 
knowledge  of  the  law  and  the  statutes*  and  other  states  copied 
Missouri's  procedure  in  their  revision  work. 

Political  history  was  made  by  Senator  Donnelly  when, 
in  1944,  he  found  himself  pitted  against  a  fellow  townsman 
from  Lebanon  for  the  high  office  of  governor-  And  the  town 
of  Lebanon  also  mad©  history  when  it  want  to  the  polls  and 
cast  the  same  number  of  ballots  for  each  candidate* 

Upon  being  elected  governor,  Phil  M*  Donnelly  stinted 
again  making  history.  He  brought  to  the  executive  office  the 
invaluable  knowledge  gained  through  years  of  experience  in 
the  legislative  bodies  and  through  the  practice  of  the  law* 
And  soon  national  attention  was  focused  on  Mmaourt  through 
certain  enlightened  policies  of  its  chief  executive, 

One  of  the  first  of  Governor  Donnelly1!  policies  thit 
brought  him  national  prominence  was  hm  insistence  thut  JVfii* 
souri  be  given  the  right  to  operate  its  own  State  employment 
service*  The  threat  of  the  Federal  Social  Security  Adminis- 
tration to  withhold  certification  of  Federal  ynempluyment  tax 
credits  became  of  the  controversy  over  the  transfer  of  the 
IL  S*  Employment  Service  in  Missouri  ootlipiect  when  the 
Governor  stood  hie  ground  and  informed  the  Federal  agency 
that  Missouri  was  prepared  to  operate  its  own  business  with- 
out Federal  aid  If  neceasary. 

Federal  dams  In  Missouri  soon  became  an  iwme  tn  the 
Donnelly  administration  tad  Governor  Donnelly  again  at- 
tracted the  attention  of  the  nation  In  his  export  handling  of 
this  "touchy"  question.  After  rejecting  t  prapoitl  to  build 
a  large  dam  at  Qw$d£»  tht  Gownim1  went  tato  tht  mtttir  df 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M»  DONNELLY  5 

flood  control  and  devised  a  working  formula  which  was  adopted 
by  other  states  as  their  blue  print  in  the  flood  control  fight* 

National  attention  again  came  to  Missouri  when  Governor 
Donnelly  moved  to  correct  conditions  that  existed  in  Mis- 
souri's penal  institutions,  especially  in  the  Training  School  for 
Boys  at  Boonville.  Citizens  of  Boonville  were  demanding  the 
school's  removal  because  of  their  fear  of  boys  who  frequently 
escaped  from  the  institution. 

Governor  Donnelly  asked  the  Training  School  Board  to 
take  steps  to  clean  up  the  situation,  When  they  hesitated 
to  act,  he  called  for  their  resignations,  appointed  a  new  board, 
and  installed  a  new  administration  at  the  school.  Criticized 
ut  the  timc%  critics  soon  began  to  see  that  the  Governor  was 
lauding  in  the  right  direction  and  their  fault-finding  soon 
turned  to  praise. 

One  of  the  outstanding  features  of  the  Donnelly  admin- 
istration was  the  wise  and  courageous  exercise  of  the  veto 
power.  Smut!  loan  laws*  sought  urgently  by  larga  interests* 

met  the  Governor's  veto.  A  change  m  the  Missouri  Stat© 
Highway  Commission  to  give  disproportionate  representation 
to  the  rural  uraas  alto  met  the  Governor's  veto, 

Those  who  read  the  Governors  veto  messages  were  im* 
pressed  with  their  thoroughness  and  their  logic,  In  each  eat©, 
the  Governor  vtry  painstakingly  told  the  legislature  Just  why 
ha  oould  not  approve  the  bill.  His  explanations  wera  direct, 
yet  without  a  itlng.  Them  was  littla  resentment  thowm  by 
any  member  of  the  General  Assembly  on  account  of  the  Gov- 
ernor's uit  of  the  vet©  power, 

Governor  Donnelly  again  attracted  national  attention  in 
handling  a  tense  situation  whin  a  group  of  250  "marching 
veterana"  from  Springfield  went  to  Jefferson  City  to  demand 
i  $400  bonus  or  l§sit  tn  the  etpitot  until  they  got  it.1*  The 
Governor*  in  i  clear  ringing  voice,  addressed  tha  veterans  in 
the  rotunda  of  the  eapitol  tad  advised  them  to  take  the 
orderly  manner  to  §emim  thtir  demands— that  thty  should 
call  on  their  iegi*Utom  and  diteusi  their  desires  with  them, 
**Wt  havt  the  tame  Democracy  in  Missouri  that  we  have  In 
Iht  United  Stttts,  the  mm*  kind  of  §ewnmmmt  that  you  went 
ami  mrmA  to  pmmrm  and  protect.  You  should  bi  the 


6  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

to  try  to  upset  that  kind  of  government,"  he  told  the  young 
men  as  they  listened  to  his  "No." 

When  politicians  started  fighting  the  proposal  to  adopt 
a  new  constitution,  Governor  Donnelly,  a  student  of  consti- 
tutional law,  came  out  for  the  adoption  of  the  new  document 
and  did  much  to  cause  the  voters  of  the  State  to  follow  his 
example  and  do  away  with  an  outmoded  basic  law.  Adoption 
of  this  new  constitution  meant  the  entire  remodeling  of  Mis- 
souri's government.  Governor  Donnelly  took  positive  leader- 
ship in  the  work  of  setting  the  new  government  on  a  firm  basis. 

Governor  Donnelly's  policies  relating  to  labor  in  several 
instances  met  with  the  disapproval  of  labor  organizations.  He 
clashed  with  labor  organizers  in  St.  Louis  when  they  attempted 
to  unionize  the  St.  Louis  police  department,  and  he  took  an 
active  interest  in  the  passage  of  several  labor-control  laws. 

Moral  and  intellectual  courage  are  not  the  only  kinds  of 
courage  shown  by  the  Governor  while  the  State's  chief  execu- 
tive. When  prison  lights  were  darkened  by  a  blast  and  prison 
officials  were  not  at  hand  to  be  in  command,  the  Governor 
rushed  to  the  Penitentiary  and  saw  to  it  that  order  was  pre- 
served. Also,  in  the  Boonville  transfer,  Governor  Donnelly 
was  in  one  of  the  cars  that  took  the  "hardened"  boys  to  their 
new  quarters  at  Jefferson  City. 

The  Governor's  positive  actions  to  wipe  out  crime  and 
gambling  in  Missouri  became  the  subject  of  acclaim  through- 
out the  State.  His  moves  against  racing  news  syndicates  and 
other  forms  of  crime,  his  naming  of  men  of  high  moral  char- 
acter to  all  police  boards,  and  his  orders  to  the  Missouri  State 
Highway  Patrol  to  stop  all  kinds  of  crime  and  racketeering  did 
not  lessen  in  his  four-year  term. 

Several  honorary  degrees  were  conferred  on  Governor 
Donnelly  during  his  term,  the  first  coming  from  his  alma 
mater,  St.  Louis  University.  In  presenting  him  for  the  honor, 
the  Very  Reverend  Patrick  J,  Holloran,  president  of  the  Uni- 
versity, said: 

"For  more  than  a  generation  the  Honorable  Phil  M*  Don- 
nelly has  served  the  citizens  of  Ms  native  state.  His  long 
record  has  been  one  of  both  distinction  and  accomplishment— 
accomplishment  of  so  irreproachable  and  noteworthy  a  ehar- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  7 

acter  that  when  he  placed  that  record  before  the  electorate  of 
the  state  as  his  title  for  the  conferment  of  the  highest  office 
in  Missouri,  the  citizens  of  Missouri  chose  him  unhesitatingly 
as  their  governor, 

"When  one  realizes  that  at  the  same  time  the  men  and 
women  of  Missouri  sent  a  member  of  the  Republican  party  to 
Washington  as  Senator  and  elected  another  member  of  that 
party  to  the  office  of  Mayor  in  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  it  becomes 
apparent  that  consideration  centered  around  the  man  himself, 
and  the  election  of  Governor  Donnelly  was  the  result  of  weigh- 
ing achievements  and  assessing  the  merit  and  the  ability  of 
the  man  in  the  light  of  the  character  reflected  in  those 
achievements/' 

Culver-Stockton  College,  Westminster  College,  and  Wil- 
liam Jewell  College  also  conferred  the  Doctor  of  Laws  degree 
on  Governor  Donnelly. 

While  his  record  as  Governor  of  the  State  has  been  his 
outstanding  accomplishment,  perchance  a  visitor  would  find 
the  former  Governor  telling  as  his  most-priced  triumph  of 
some  victory  at  the  bar.  The  law  is  now,  and  has  always  been, 
his  profession  and  his  hobby.  When  others  play  golf,  fish, 
hunt,  or  relax  in  some  way,  Phil  Donnelly  finds  relaxation  in 
the  study  of  the  law*  Visiting  with  him,  one  may  find  him 
interested  in  a  story  of  how  this  or  that  trial  was  won-  His 
keen  mind  detects  instantly  a  break  in  testimony  and  his 
knowledge  of  the  law  enables  him  to  follow  that  break  to  a 
successful  conclusion.  The  training  of  his  son  David  in  the 
law  is  a  task  that  the  former  Governor  now  enjoys.  The 
father-son  combination  has  ever  been  a  close,  delightful  com- 
radeship. Their  business  relationship  continues  on  the  same 
understandably  high  plane, 

But  Phil  Donnelly  has  not  given  all  of  his  time  to  the 
law  and  to  public  life*  Fraternally,  he  is  affiliated  with  the 
Independent  Order  of  Odd  Fellows,  and  after  serving  in  various 
capacities  in  the  subordinate  bodies,  he  was  elected  and  served 
the  Grand  Lodge  L  0*  0,  F.  of  Missouri  as  its  Grand  Master 
in  1081  and  1932*  He  is  also  a  member  of  the  Woodmen  of 
the  World  and  is  affiliated  with  all  the  York  Rite  Masonic 
bodies  in  Lebanon  and  with  the  Abou  Ben  Adhem  Temple 
of  the  Nobles  of  the  Mystic  Shrine  at  Springfield. 


8  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Governor  Donnelly  is  a  member  of  the  Lebanon  Chamber 
of  Commerce  and  of  the  Lebanon  Lions  Club.  He  belongs  to 
the  Missouri  State  Bar  Association  and  to  the  Nineteenth 
Judicial  Circuit  Bar  Association,  having  served  as  president 
of  the  latter  association. 

At  the  end  of  Governor  Donnelly's  term,  the  accomplish- 
ments of  his  administration  were  widely  acclaimed  by  news- 
papers over  the  State.  A  St.  Louis  newspaper,  in  an  editorial 
entitled  "Gov.  Donnelly  Steps  Down,"  said: 

"The  retiring  Governor  possessed  several  outstanding 
qualifications  for  that  office.  He  is  an  outstanding  lawyer, 
he  had  long  experience  in  the  state  senate,  he  had  an  intimate 
acquaintance  with  state  government,  he  was  no  narrow  par- 
tisan— and  he  had  courage.  The  slick  politicians  of  his  party 
didn't  get  very  far  with  him,  which  explains  the  grumbling  in 
some  quarters.  Every  Assembly  bill,  every  proposal  or  re- 
quest that  came  to  his  desk  was  subjected  to  judicial  scrutiny. 
When  he  acted,  it  was  with  the  conviction  that  he  was  right, 
legally  and  morally,  and  there  was  no  temporizing  for  reasons 
of  political  expediency.  Charges  to  the  contrary  were  never 
seriously  pressed  or  proved.  At  no  time  has  there  been  a 
question  as  to  who  was  Governor.  Phil  Donnelly  bowed  to 
no  clique  within  or  without  his  party,  no  pressure  group—he 
was  strictly  on  his  own*'1 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY 


INAUGURAL  ADDRESS 

JANUARY  8,  1946 
Frotn  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  87-94 


Members  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  Missouri: 

Twenty-two  years  ago  I  took  the  oath  of  office  as  a 
member  of  the  General  Assembly  of  Missouri.  I  have  had 
the  honor  of  serving  in  the  General  Assembly  continuously 
since  that  time.  Today,  I  have  taken  the  oath  as  governor, 
the  highest  office  within  the  gift  of  the  people  of  this  State. 

I  have  taken  this  oath  in  deepest  humility  and  with  the 
sincere  hope  that  God  will  guide  me,  and  give  me  the  courage, 
the  strength  and  the  wisdom  to  perform  the  duties  incident 
to  this  office,  and  that  I  may  serve  the  citizens  of  Missouri 
in  an  efficient  and  unselfish  manner. 

I  am  proud  of  my  native  State.  It  is  my  desire  to  give 
to  our  State  a  practical  and  businesslike  administration*  I 
want  to  carry  out  a  constructive  program  for  the  best  interests 
of  our  citizens,  I  am  confident  that  by  close  cooperation 
between  the  executive  and  legislative  branches  of  the  State 
government  this  can  be  done.  This  cooperation  will  greatly 
increase  the  efficiency  of  the  service  which  we  desire  to  render. 
To  that  end  I  come  to  you  today  with  some  suggestions  which 
I  feel  we  should  consider  as  we  open  this  new  year  and  this 
new  administration. 

NEW  CONSTITUTION 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  voters  of  Missouri  will  decide 
on  the  adoption  or  the  rejection  of  a  new  constitution  on 
February  27,  the  adoption  of  which  will  make  it  necessary  to 
ohange  many  of  our  existing  laws  in  order  that  our  statutes 
may  comply  with  the  provisions  of  the  proposed  new  docu* 
ment,  it  is  my  suggestion  that  no  legislation  be  enacted  be- 
fore February  27  which  wotild  conflict  with  the  proposed 
changes  in  the  new  constitution, 


10  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

It  is  my  intention  to  make  certain  recommendations  to 
this  General  Assembly  with  reference  to  consolidation  of  differ- 
ent departments  and  functions  of  State  government.  I  also 
have  in  mind  changes  in  other  matters  which  are  on  the  pro- 
gram of  this  administration,  but  I  intend  to  hold  these  matters 
in  abeyance  until  the  decision  of  the  voters  on  the  proposed 
new  constitution  has  been  made. 

SURPLUS  FUND 

It  is  estimated  that  a  surplus  of  approximately  $18,000,- 
000.00  will  remain  in  the  general  revenue  fund  after  all  current 
obligations  of  the  past  biennium  have  been  paid.  I  recommend 
that  this  surplus,  and  any  accumulated  surplus  as  the  result 
of  economical  spending,  be  safeguarded  as  a  backlog  for  post- 
war projects  and  postwar  employment.  Since  the  war  and 
business  incident  thereto  have  been  responsible  for  this  sur- 
plus, it  would  seem  not  only  the  part  of  good  business  but  a 
moral  obligation  that  it  be  set  aside  to  take  care  of  some  of 
the  damage  this  war  will  inflict  on  Missouri.  It  is  going  to 
require  hardheaded  resistance  to  pressure  groups  by  both  the 
General  Assembly  and  the  Governor  in  order  that  this  surplus 
be  judiciously  spent,  and  I  earnestly  recommend  to  you  that 
you  regard  this  surplus  as  a  sacred  fund. 

NEEDLESS  PRINTING 

Since  I  became  connected  with  the  State  government  I 
have  noted,  each  biennium,  the  increase  in  needless  printing* 
Many  reports  are  called  for  by  law,  and  the  law  demands  that 
the  different  departments  prepare  and  print  large  volumes 
detailing  their  work  for  each  biennium*  It  Is  my  belief  that 
little  or  no  use  is  made  of  these  printed  reports,  and,  too, 
these  reports  are  carried  over  and  reprinted  in  the  appendix 
of  our  legislative  journals.  I  recommend  that  you  cause  a 
thorough  study  of  this  waste  and  that  you  amend  or  repeal 
existing  laws  that  demand  such  printing.  Hundreds  of  thou- 
sands of  dollars  wiU  be  saved  to  the  taxpayers  annually  by  & 
revision  of  the  printing  laws,  and  the  paper  and  manpower 
shortage  in  the  printing  industry  will  be  greatly  relieved 
thereby. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  11 

VOIDING  WARRANTS 

My  attention  has  been  called  to  the  fact  that  the  State 
of  Missouri  has  many  warrants  outstanding  over  the  period 
of  years,  some  of  them  being  twenty  to  thirty  years  old. 
Each  State  Treasurer  is  called  upon  to  carry  these  warrants 
forward,  taking  much  valuable  time  and  bookkeeping  expense. 
The  Federal  government,  and  several  state  governments,  have 
laws  voiding  their  warrants  at  the  end  of  a  given  period.  I 
recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  enact  a  law  directing 
the  voidance  of  a  Missouri  warrant  uncashed  at  the  end  of  a 
stated  period. 

DESTROYING  OLD  PAPERS 

Absence  of  any  law  permitting  the  State  officers  to  dis- 
card and  destroy  old  papers  which  are  filed  in  their  offices 
is  causing  a  serious  storage  problem  to  the  State.  Storage 
facilities  are  crowded  and  storage  cabinets  are  being  purchased 
each  year  at  an  enormous  cost  to  the  taxpayers.  I  recommend 
that  laws  be  enacted  permitting  the  discarding  and  destroying 
of  old  papers  which  are  worthless  to  the  State  at  the  end  of  a 
given  period* 

LEGAL  DEPARTMENT 

Over  a  period  of  years  various  State  departments  have 
been  authorized  to  employ  attorneys,  and  others  have  employed 
attorneys  unauthorized,  although  in  some  instances  they  have 
been  given  other  titles,  As  a  result,  the  State  has  numerous 
legal  departments  performing  in  many  instances  duties  which 
overlap  those  imposed  upon  the  Attorney  General  and  his 
staff.  The  opinions  of  these  various  legal  departments  have 
often  been  in  conflict  with  the  opinions  of  the  Attorney  Gen- 
eral, thereby  causing  confusion  and  uncertainty  of  action. 
The  State  of  Missouri  should  have  only  one  legal  department- 
It  should  be  adequately  staffed  to  properly  serve  all  the  de** 
partments  of  the  State.  This  would  prevent  duplication  of 
effort,  conflict  of  authority  and  unnecessary  expenditure  of 
money.  This  legal  department  should  be  under  the  juris- 
diction of  the  duly  elected  Attorney  General,  and  I  recommend 
to  this  General  Assembly  that  appropriate  legation  be  en- 
acted to  accomplish  this  end* 


12  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

FISCAL  YEAR 

Our  fiscal  year  should  be  changed.  If  it  is  not  changed 
by  the  result  of  the  vote  on  the  proposed  new  constitution, 
then  a  constitutional  amendment  should  be  submitted  for  that 
specific  purpose.  At  the  beginning  of  each  biennium  we  face 
a  temporary  emergency  until  money  can  be  appropriated  for 
State  needs.  Many  times  this  temporary  emergency  under  our 
present  fiscal  system  involves  hardships. 

I  note  that  there  have  already  been  introduced  in  this 
General  Assembly  bills  appropriating  funds  for  the  first  six 
month  period  of  this  biennium.  These  bills  should  be  regarded 
as  emergency  measures  and  provide  for  only  necessary  functions 
of  government  without  establishing  a  policy  or  standard  of 
appropriation  for  the  entire  biennial  period. 

It  is  possible  that  even  with  the  utmost  diligence  these 
bills  may  not  be  passed  in  sufficient  time  to  promptly  meet 
the  current  obligation  of  the  State  toward  its  social  security 
program.  I,  therefore,  suggest  the  following  for  your  con- 
sideration: 

In  times  past  the  General  Assembly  and  the  Governor 
have  met  on  terms  of  confidence  and  have  passed  and  approved 
concurrent  resolutions  requesting  the  Auditor  to  audit,  and 
the  Treasurer  to  pay  necessary  operating  expenses  of  the 
State  government,  pending  the  passage  of  appropriation  bills 
and  pledging  their  honor  that  before  the  General  Assembly 
adjourned  these  payments  would  be  met  by  appropriation 
bills.  I  have  implicit  trust  and  confidence  in  you,  and  I 
recommend  that  you  pass  a  concurrent  resolution  without 
delay  authorizing  the  payment  of  old  age  assistance*  aid  to 
dependent  children  and  relief  for  the  month  of  January  and 
until  the  necessary  appropriation  bills  have  been  passed*  I 
will  speedily  approve  such  a  resolution  and  we  should  be  able 
to  get  these  checks  to  needy  Missourians  within  the  nert 
few  days, 

CONSOLIDATION 

Those  of  you  who  have  served  several  session®  of  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  will  recall  how  small  functions  of  government 
once  recognized  and  established  by  the  General  Assembly* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  13 

start  growing  arid  continue  to  grow  until  they  become  major 
problems.  It  is  time,  in  my  opinion,  that  we  begin  to  con- 
solidate and  integrate  functions  of  our  State  government,  and 
that  we  stop  enlarging  and  expanding  departments,  staffs  and 
bureaus.  To  that  end  I  suggest  that  this  General  Assembly 
proceed  to  enact  laws  which  will  bring  to  the  citizens  of  the 
State  improved  government  at  a  greatly  decreased  cost. 

PENAL  AND  ELEEMOSYNARY  INSTITUTIONS 

I  have  previously  announced  my  belief  that  employees 
in  the  State  eleemosynary  and  penal  institutions  should  be 
selected  on  the  basis  of  merit  and  that  the  adoption  of  the 
merit  system  in  these  institutions  will  serve  the  best  interests 
of  those  for  whom  these  institutions  care.  I  am  very  definitely 
of  that  conviction,  I  call  your  attention  to  the  fact  that  it 
will  not  be  easy  to  correct  many  of  the  problems  affecting 
these  institutions  and  that  in  considering  such  remedies  it  will 
not  be  to  our  advantage  to  approach  them  in  a  hasty  or  super- 
ficial manner. 

Many  problems  arise  from  the  operation  of  our  eleemosy- 
nary institutions.  They  are  the  fault  of  an  antiquated  system. 
Some  of  the  problems  have  existed  for  years.  Overcrowding, 
limitation  of  vitally  needed  facilities,  underpaid  and  inade- 
quate staffs,  all  add  to  the  problem  confronting  us  in  the 
administration  of  eleemosynary  affairs* 

We  may  soon  be  called  upon  to  distinguish  between  cus- 
todial care  for  senile  patients  and  the  necessity  of  emphasizing 
curative  treatment  for  those  who  may  be  completely  restored 
to  mental  health* 

I  suggest  that  the  General  Assembly  consider  removing 
the  statutory  maximum  on  the  salaries  provided  for  physicians 
at  these  institutions.  The  extremely  low  salary  schedules  pro- 
vided for  physicians  at  these  institutions  do  not  permit  us 
to  furnish  the  type  of  care  required  in  the  most  progressive 
hospitals* 

My  attention  was  called  a  few  months  ago  to  the  sana- 
torium at  Mt  Version  where  we  had  150  patients  on  the  wait- 
ing list,  I  was  told  that  at  that  time  we  had  space  in  the 


14  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

institution  for  an  additional  230  patients  but  we  did  not  have 
sufficient  medical  staff  to  care  for  them.  This  is  one  example 
of  the  problem  that  confronts  us  in  our  eleemosynary  admin- 
istration. 

Our  penal  institutions  also  present  a  perplexing  problem. 
The  introduction  of  a  merit  system  will  probably  be  only  one 
of  the  steps  necessary  to  put  our  penal  system  on  a  par  with 
our  nation's  care  of  society's  offenders.  It  is  probable  that 
when  a  merit  system  is  considered  for  the  penal  institutions 
a  more  flexible  provision  regarding  salaries  may  be  needed. 

I  suggest  that  this  General  Assembly,  through  appro- 
priate committees  and  with  the  assistance  of  the  Committee 
on  Legislative  Research,  make  a  factual  study  of  the  admin- 
istration and  operation  of  the  penal  and  eleemosynary  insti- 
tutions to  the  end  that  legislation  may  be  enacted  to  remedy 
conditions  found  to  exist. 

This  study,  I  believe,  should  scrutinize  carefully  our  han- 
dling of  juvenile  and  adult  offenders  in  our  reformatories  and 
prisons.  It  is  my  belief  that  we  have  lagged  greatly  in  Mis- 
souri in  these  institutions,  particularly  in  the  handling  of  juve- 
nile offenders.  Widespread  criticism  has  resulted  because  of 
our  failure  to  give  them  the  corrective  care  and  custody 
contemplated  by  law.  I  believe  that  the  Boys  Reformatory 
at  Boonville  should  be  thoroughly  divorced  from  contact  with 
adult  or  hardened  criminals  from  the  Penitentiary  and  that 
emphasis  should  be  placed  on  the  educational  facilities  offered 
these  boys,  even  to  the  extent  of  establishing  a  high  school 
to  further  the  education  of  those  held  under  our  care, 

I,  of  course,  do  not  regard  the  adoption  of  a  merit  system 
for  these  institutions  as  a  panacea  for  ail  of  their  troubles, 
but  it  is  my  recommendation  that  this  General  Assembly 
give  deep  and  sincere  thought  to  correcting  conditions  that 
will  be  found  to  exist. 

BUILDING  PROGRAM 

Several  of  the  institutions  have  made  requests  for  new 
buildings  and  others  have  requested  that  repairs  be  made  to 
buildings  already  erected.  These  are  matters  that  should 
receive  your  careful  and  serious  consideration.  I  recommend 
for  your  consideration  the  establishment  of  a  State  agency. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  15 

probably  within  the  Budget  Department,  where  experienced 
personnel  would  have  charge  of  the  erection  of  new  buildings 
and  the  repairing  and  remodeling  of  buildings  already  erected. 
In  this  way,  institutions  which  are  in  need  of  new  buildings 
or  which  have  buildings  in  need  of  repair  will  be  able  to  have 
this  done  and  the  unneeded  construction  of  buildings  will  be 
prevented.  It  will  also  stop  the  practice  of  institutions  com- 
ing before  you  competing  with  each  other  for  new  buildings. 
In  this  connection  I  recommend  that  you  give  thought  to  the 
setting  aside  of  the  revenue  collected  from  the  five  cent  prop- 
erty tax  as  a  permanent  fund  to  be  used  solely  for  the  con- 
struction of  new  buildings  and  the  repair  of  old  buildings. 
The  establishment  of  this  permanent  fund  to  be  used  for  no 
other  purpose  should  assist  in  solving  our  building  problems. 

SOCIAL  SECURITY 

From  many  sources  come  recommendations  as  to  ways 
and  means  to  improve  our  laws  permitting  aid  to  our  aged, 
needy  and  dependent  citizens.  This  is  one  of  the  vital  phases 
of  our  State  government  and  we  should  work  unceasingly  to 
improve  our  laws  and  to  aid  our  needy*  Many  indigent,  aged 
citizens  are  not  now  receiving  aid  sufficient  to  allow  them  to 
live  in  a  status  compatible  with  decency  and  health.  This 
is  the  result  of  others  not  so  needy  being  on  the  rolls  and  tak- 
ing the  funds  available  for  the  relief  of  these  deserving  citizens. 
I  recommend  that  a  careful  and  faithful  study  be  made  of  our 
social  security  laws  and  its  administration  to  the  end  that 
we  may  meet  the  call  from  our  aged,  needy  and  dependent 
citizens  substantially  and  courteously. 

UNEMPLOYMENT  COMPENSATION 

During  the  period  of  postwar  readjustment,  our  State 
Unemployment  Compensation  Law  will  play  a  major  role, 
and  for  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  workers  who  are  now 
gainfully  employed  in  war  industries,  but  who  may  be  laid 
off  and  unemployed  during  industry's  reconversion  and  read- 
justment to  peacetime  production,  it  must  serve  as  an  effective 
"first  line  of  defense/1  During  the  months  after  victory  has 
been  won,  our  unemployment  compensation  program  will  be 
put  to  a  severe  test.  In  order  that  we  meet  that  test  and 


16  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

have  an  unemployment  compensation  program  adequate  from 
every  standpoint  to  meet  the  challenge  of  the  postwar  years, 
our  unemployment  compensation  reserve  fund  must  be  sol- 
vent, the  coverage  and  benefit  provisions  of  our  law  should 
afford  the  maximum  of  protection  consistent  with  the  economy 
of  our  State,  and  the  administration  of  the  law  should  be 
simplified  and  made  effective  to  handle  the  tremendous  admin- 
istrative load  of  postwar  benefit  payments. 

I  recommend  to  the  General  Assembly  that  a  careful 
estimate  respecting  the  solvency  of  the  State's  Unemployment 
Compensation  Fund  be  made,  and  if  you  believe  the  fund  to 
be  inadequate,  that  legislation  requiring  higher  wartime  con- 
tribution rates,  which  expire  June  30,  1945,  be  simplified  and 
continued;  that  a  careful  review  be  made  of  the  coverage  and 
benefit  provisions  of  our  law  with  a  view  to  making  such  im- 
provements as  will  afford  maximum  benefit  protection  to  un- 
employed workers;  and,  that  wherever  possible,  administra- 
tive procedures  be  streamlined  and  simplified  to  the  end  that 
we  may  be  assured  of  maximum  speed  and  efficiency  in  pay- 
ing benefits  under  the  peak  load  conditions  of  the  postwar 
period. 

CHILDREN'S  CODE 

I  suggest  that  you  give  consideration  to  legislation  author- 
izing the  creation  of  a  Children's  Code  Commission  for  the 
purpose  of  studying  the  needs  of  revising  our  laws  pertaining 
to  the  welfare  of  neglected  and  delinquent  children* 

EDUCATION 

Only  through  an  enlightened  citizenship  can  our  State 
advance.  We  must  educate  our  children  and  enact  legisla- 
tion for  the  benefit  of  our  elementary  and  high  schools  and 
for  our  institutions  of  higher  education* 

Many  of  our  men  and  women  have  had  their  education 
interrupted  by  reason  of  military  service*  I  consider  it  ths 
duty  of  the  State  to  give  them  the  opportunity  to  complete 
their  education  and  rehabilitate  themselves  in  gainful  occupa- 
tions. Our  present  school  system  should  be  adjusted  to  eare 
for  these  returned  war  veterans  who  wiU  have  sacrificed  so 
much  for  our  country,  Legislation,  If  ntc&sstiy*  should  be 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  17 

enacted  to  prepare  our  schools  for  assisting  these  men  and 
women  in  finding  their  place  in  normal  civilian  life. 

FEDERAL  LOANS 

The  Federal  Congress  has  passed  the  Servicemen's  Read- 
justment Act  of  1944,  commonly  referred  to  as  the  G.  L  Bill 
of  Rights.  State  banks  and  trust  companies  apparently  have 
sufficient  legislative  authority  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of 
this  act.  However,  legislation  may  be  necessary  to  remove 
the  present  statutory  restrictions  applicable  to  savings  banks 
and  safe  deposit  institutions,  mortgage  loan  companies,  build- 
ing and  loan  associations  and  insurance  companies  to  enable 
these  institutions  to  come  under  the  provisions  of  this  act. 
Since  thousands  of  veterans  have  been  and  are  being  dis- 
charged in  Missouri  all  possible  steps  should  be  taken  to 
facilitate  and  expedite  the  making  of  loans  by  our  lending 
institutions  to  deserving  veterans  under  this  act. 

SURPLUS  PROPERTY 

There  is  available  to  the  State  of  Missouri  from  various 
agencies  of  the  Federal  government  certain  materials,  supplies 
and  equipment  which  are  known  as  surplus  property.  This 
surplus  property  can  be  used  by  the  State,  its  institutions, 
agencies  and  political  subdivisions-  Missouri  has  no  statu- 
tory authority  to  receive  or  accept  this  surplus  property.  If 
Missouri  is  to  participate  in  this  program  then  proper  legis- 
lation must  be  enacted. 

Your  attention  is  also  directed  to  the  War  Mobilization 
and  Reconversion  Act  of  1944  which  authorizes  the  Federal 
Works  Administrator  to  make  advances  to  states,  their  agen- 
cies and  political  subdivisions  to  aid  in  financing  the  cost  of 
plan  preparation  preliminary  to  the  construction  of  public 
works,  and  I  recommend  that  le^Wation  be  enacted  to  take 
advantage  of  this  law. 

AVIATION 

We  must  anticipate,  because  of  the  immense  impetus 
given  to  the  development  of  aviation  by  this  war,  that  the 
postwar  period  will  bring  to  tibds  nation  &  phenomenal  develop* 


18  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

ment  of  peacetime,  commercial  aviation.  Missouri  must  be 
in  the  lead  in  the  recognition  of  this  development.  I  recom- 
mend the  enactment  of  legislation  to  insure  adequate  laws  for 
the  establishment,  zoning,  and  regulation  of  airports  and  for 
the  development  of  aviation  facilities  and  traffic. 

HIGHWAY  CONSTRUCTION 

Under  an  act,  recently  passed  by  Congress  and  signed  by 
the  President,  which  became  effective  in  December,  there  will 
be  available  to  Missouri  in  the  postwar  period  for  highway 
purposes  approximately  $43,000,000.00.  One  of  the  require- 
ments of  this  Federal  Act  is  that  the  money  be  matched  on 
a  fifty-fifty  basis  by  the  state  or  local  subdivisions. 

It  is  my  information  that  the  State  Highway  Commission 
has  a  backlog  in  excels  of  $12,000,000.00  which,  with  the 
anticipated  highway  funds  for  1945  and  1946,  will  enable  the 
Highway  Commission  to  obtain  from  the  Federal  Government 
approximately  $14,000,000,00  each  year  for  1945  and  1946. 

This  Federal  Act  will  involve  more  money  than  has  for- 
merly been  available  from  Federal  sources  and  I  suggest  that 
your  appropriations  be  made  with  this  in  view. 

I  direct  your  attention  to  the  fact  that  54%  of  Missouri 
farmers  still  live  on  dirt  roads.  Our  present  highway  system 
should  be  extended  and  roads  constructed  so  this  large  number 
of  Missourians  may  have  access  to  improved  roads. 

AGRICULTURE 

There  must  always  be  steady  progress  in  agriculture,  the 
primary  source  of  the  wealth  of  our  State  and  the  basis  for 
the  livelihood  of  most  of  our  people.  Soil  and  water,  forests 
and  other  renewable  natural  resources,  must  be  conserved  and 
their  uses  improved.  Even  though  Missouri  farm  products 
are  now  generally  of  the  highest  quality,  we  should  look 
toward  greater  improvement.  We  must  strive  to  maintain 
equality  between  producer  and  consumer,  and  utilize  every 
means  to  enhance  our  competitive  position  in  the  markets  of 
the  country.  We  should  encourage  all  responsible  organisa- 
tions and  movements  devoted  to  the  welfare  of  agriculture. 
Research  for  the  better  use  of  the  soil  tad  its  products,  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  19 

teaching  of  progressive  and  practical  advancements  in  agri- 
culture must  always  be  encouraged  and  stimulated. 

All  of  these  basic  conditions  for  prosperous  farming  are 
of  vital  interest  to  this  State  and  are  of  vital  concern  to  this 
administration.  They  can  be  assisted  by  your  legislative 
action. 

FLOOD  CONTROL 

Missouri  is  one  of  the  states  in  the  Missouri  River  Drain- 
age Basin,  and,  therefore,  has  a  vital  interest  in  the  Federal 
Government's  plan  for  utilization  of  the  water  resources  of 
the  Missouri  Valley  and  for  related  developments  and  improve- 
ments. The  1944  Federal  Flood  Control  Act  enacted  only  a 
few  weeks  ago  carries  authorization  for  a  vast  program  of 
improvements  for  flood  prevention,  irrigation,  navigation, 
electric  power  generation,  and  other  applications  of  controlled 
water  for  the  benefit  of  the  people.  This  involves  construction 
of  dams,  reservoirs,  irrigation  works,  levees  and  other  projects. 
The  possibilities  offered  by  this  program  for  stabilizing  and 
improving  the  economy  of  our  State  and  for  opening  up  post- 
war jobs  and  business  opportunities  for  our  citizens  merit 
your  consideration.  The  flood  prevention  feature  of  this 
valley-wide  program  is  of  high  importance  to  the  people  of 
Missouri* 

This  should  be  carried  out  in  a  way  that  will  bring  the 
greatest  benefits  to  our  State,  to  the  region  and  to  the  nation 
as  a  whole,  and,  therefore,  it  is  suggested  that  this  General 
Assembly  give  this  entire  subject  its  serious  consideration,  and 
if  necessary  enact  legislation  to  cooperate  with  the  Federal 
government. 

INTERSTATE  COOPERATION 

We  number  our  neighbors  now,  not  by  the  families  who 
live  next  door,  on  the  adjoining  farm  or  in  the  same  apartment 
building,  but  by  states  and  even  nations.  Missouri  has  been 
backward  in  some  of  her  laws  permitting  cooperation  between 
states,  and  I  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  study 
needed  legislation  to  permit  Missouri  to  cooperate  with  her 
sister  states  and  to  join  in  councils  of  states  on  matters  ol 
•vital  interest  to  all 


20  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

CONCLUSION 

I  realize  full  well  the  responsibilities,  trials  and  ambitions 
which  you  as  legislators  have.  For  years  I  have  faced  the 
problems  which  you  are  now  facing.  It  has  been  my  privilege 
in  both  the  House  and  in  the  Senate  to  sit  in  the  councils  of 
the  committees  and  to  work  with  the  members.  I  know  most 
of  you  personally  and  have  worked  with  you  on  various  prob- 
lems of  the  State.  As  a  former  member  of  the  appropriations 
committee  I  know  of  the  demands  that  pressure  groups  will 
make  upon  you.  I  am  pledged  to  the  people  of  Missouri  to 
see  that  we  have  an  economical  as  well  as  an  efficient  adminis- 
tration and  I  intend  to  keep  that  pledge.  With  your  help 
we  can  give  the  State  a  government  of  the  highest  type,  with- 
out impairing  the  efficiency  of  the  service, 

If  occasion  should  arise  where  I  can  be  of  assistance  to 
you,  I  trust  you  will  feel  as  free  to  call  upon  me  as  I  want  to 
feel  in  discussing  matters  with  you.  Together  we  can  form  a 
team  of  the  executive  and  legislative  branches  which  will 
inspire  in  the  minds  of  the  people  confidence  in  and  respect 
for  government. 

And  now,  as  we  enter  this  biennium  with  all  its  tasks,  its 
problems  and  its  opportunities,  let  us  enter  it  together,  know- 
ing that  while  we  are  assembled  here  our  sons,  our  daughters, 
our  kinsmen  and  our  friends  are  giving  their  iifeblood  that  we 
may  enjoy  free  government.  Let  us  vow  with  each  other 
that  we  shall  be  true  to  them.  Let  us  forget  prejudices  and 
petty  issues,  and  devote  our  energies  to  the  imperative  needs 
and  problems  with  which  we  are  confronted. 

To  this  end,  and  because  through  the  progress  which  we 
initiate,  our  returning  sons  and  daughters  may  find  the  fullest 
economic  opportunity  awaiting  them  in  their  old  home  State, 
I  pledge  to  you  my  fullest  cooperation,  my  best  wishes  aa4 
my  friendship, 

[PHIL  M.  DONNELLY,] 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  21 


FIRST  BIENNIAL  MESSAGE 

JANUARY  8,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  15-27 


To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly: 

In  my  inaugural  address,  delivered  to  the  members  of  the 
Sixty-third  General  Assembly  two  years  ago,  I  urged  that  the 
executive  and  legislative  branches  of  the  State  government 
work  together  as  a  team  to  accomplish  our  tasks.  I  repeat 
that  proposal  today  and  pledge  again  my  fullest  cooperation 
in  promoting  a  sound  and  business-like  administration  of  the 
affairs  of  this  great  State.  Let  us  advance  the  interests  of 
Missouri  in  the  days  to  come  in  that  spirit  of  mutual  help- 
fulness. 

Under  the  Constitution,  at  the  commencement  of  each 
session  of  the  General  Assembly  it  is  the  duty  of  the  Governor 
to  give  to  the  General  Assembly  information  as  to  the  state 
of  the  government  an,d  also  to  recommei^d  for  consideration 
such  measures  as  he  shall  deem  necessary  and  expedient.  In 
accordance  with  that  mandate  I  wish  to  submit  the  follow- 
ing information,  and  to  make  certain  suggestions  and  recom- 
mendations. 

REVENUE 

The  State  of  Missouri  is  in  a  sound  financial  condition* 
The  cash  balance  in  the  State  Treasury  as  of  June  30,  1946, 
was  $22,475,720,81;  the  estimated  receipts  for  the  fiscal  year 
ending  June  30,  1947,  are  $82,531,070,00,  making  a  total  of 
$105,006,790,81,  There  was  paid  out  of  the  1945-1946  appro- 
priation during  this  fiscal  year  $1,483,366.19;  there  was  trans- 
ferred to  the  post  war  fund  during  this  fiscal  year  $12,000,- 
000,00;  the  appropriations  for  1946-1947  out  of  the  general 
revenue  fund  amount  to  $49,438,162.43;  the  estimated  amount 
set  aside  to  the  school  fund  is  $27,405,690,00,  making  a  total 
of  $90,327,218*62,  which  deducted  from  $105,006,790.81  will 
leave  an  estimated  balance  as  of  June  30,  1947,  of  $14,679,** 
57Z19, 


22  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

While  the  cash  balance  in  the  State  Treasury  in  all  funds 
on  December  31,  1946,  was  $84,809,967.89,  it  must  be  remem- 
bered that  most  of  this  is  already  earmarked,  and  that  the 
cash  balance  to  the  credit  of  the  Revenue  Fund  on  that  date 
was  $13,181,353.95. 

The  present  estimate  of  State  revenue  for  the  1947-1949 
biennium,  as  compiled  by  the  Budget  Department  from  esti- 
mates of  revenue  submitted  by  the  various  collecting  agencies, 
is  $103,316,344.05.  The  budget  has  not  been  finally  approved, 
but  it  has  been  tentatively  approved  for  $101,892,916.00. 

POST  WAR  FUND 

With  reference  to  the  post  war  fund,  there  was  a  balance 
as  of  June  30,  1946,  of  $18,000,000.00.  The  transfer  to  this 
fund  from  the  State  Revenue  Fund  during  this  fiscal  year  of 
$12,000,000.00,  makes  a  total  of  $30,000,000.00,  Appropria- 
tions in  the  sum  of  $6,829,500.33  were  authorized  out  of  this 
fund;  there  was  also  transferred  from  this  fund  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund  $2,000,000.00,  making  a  total  of  $8,829,500.33* 
This  leaves  an,  estimated  balance  in  this  fund  as  ol  June  30, 
1947,  of  $21,170,499.67, 

I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  resist  all  efforts 
to  raid  this  surplus  fund.  It  should  be  preserved  as  a  sacred 
trust  against  the  day  of  need  and  the  unforeseen  emergencies 
of  the  future. 

HIGHWAY  FUNDS 

Under  the  provisions  of  the  Federal  Aid  Highway  Act  of 
1944,  approximately  $28,750,000*00  was  made  available  for 
the  two  years  following  July  1,  1945.  Approximately  $4,500,- 
000.00  available  from  previous  appropriations,  not  expended 
because  of  wartime  restrictions  upon  construction,  increased 
the  total  available  Federal  funds  to  $33,250,000,00.  By  Janu- 
ary 1,  1947,  this  amount  was  reduced  to  approximately  $25,- 
250,000.00  by  construction  work  amounting  to  $16,000,000*00 
and  requiring  the  use  of  $8,000,000.00  Federal  funds*  The 
present  balance  of  $25,250,000.00  must  be  matched  by  the 
State.  Another  $14,000,000*00  of  Federal  funds  will  become 
available  July  1,  1947,  which  also  must  be  matched  by  the 
State,  making  a  total  to  be  matched  of  $39,2SQ»000,0Q*  Be- 
cause of  Federal  restrictions  upon  construction  and  shortages 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  23 

of  labor  and  materials,  construction  was  almost  completely 
abandoned  during  the  war,  resulting  in  the  accumulation  of  a 
reserve  fund  of  about  $18,500,000.00,  which  is  now  available 
to  match  Federal  aid  funds.  Only  the  existence  of  this  reserve 
fund  will  enable  the  State  to  match  Federal  funds  during  the 
biennial  period  beginning  July  1,  1947,  as  net  highway  reve- 
nues will  not  be  sufficient  for  that  purpose. 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

I  call  your  attention  to  Section  25,  Article  IV,  of  the  1945 
Constitution  which  reads  as  follows:  "Until  it  acts  on  all  the 
appropriations  recommended  in  the  Budget,  neither  House  of 
the  General  Assembly  shall  pass  any  appropriation  other  than 
emergency  appropriations  recommended  by  the  Governor." 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
made  no  appropriation  for  the  contingent  expenses  of  the 
Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  for  the  period  commencing 
January  8,  1947,  and  ending  June  30,  1947,  I  recommend  that 
there  be  appropriated  out  of  the  State  Treasury,  changeable 
to  the  General  Revenue  Fund,  for  the  expenses  of  the  Senate 
of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  for  the  period  January 
8,  1947,  to  June  30,  1947,  inclusive,  the  sum  of  $50,000.00; 
and  for  the  contingent  expenses  of  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  for  the  period 
January  8,  1947,  to  June  30,  1947,  inclusive,  the  sum  of 
$75,000.00. 

Numerous  suggestions  have  been  made  by  various  depart- 
ments of  the  State  government  with  reference  to  changes  in 
the  statutes  relating  to  their  respective  departments.  It  is 
anticipated  that  many  of  the  suggestions  will  be  submitted 
to  you  for  your  consideration  and  such,  if  any,  action  you  may 
deem  proper.  As  many  of  these  suggestions  are  detailed  and 
would  require  much  time  for  discussion,  no  further  mention 
of  them  will  be  made  in  this  message. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  I  made  a  number  of  suggestions 
to  the  Sbcty-third  General  Assembly  in  messages  in  regard  to 
corrections  which  should  be  made  in  the  statutes  enacted  by 
that  General  Assembly,  I  respectfully  call  your  attention  to 
those  messages  with  recommendation  for  such  action,  if  any, 
as  you  may  deem  proper* 


24  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

BUILDING  PROGRAM 

As  a  member  of  the  State  Senate  of  the  Sixty-second 
General  Assembly,  I  introduced  Senate  Bill  No.  121,  provid- 
ing for  the  erection  and  construction  of  a  State  Office  Build- 
ing in  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  in  order  that  suitable  office 
facilities  might  be  available  for  the  various  branches  of  the 
State  government.  A  number  of  the  members  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  were  members  of  the  Sixty-second 
General  Assembly  and  voted  for  that  bill.  Additional  office 
space  was  necessary  at  that  time  due  to  the  fact  that  the 
employees  of  the  Unemployment  Compensation  Commission 
were  housed  in  a  building  that  was  not  satisfactory,  and  a 
number  of  other  departments  of  the  State  government  were 
housed  in  buildings  in  Jefferson  City  for  which  they  were  pay- 
ing rent.  Those  conditions  have  become  more  critical  since 
1943,  I,  therefore,  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly 
appropriate  sufficient  funds  for  the  erection  of  a  State  Office 
Building  in  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  in  accordance  with  the 
provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  121  of  the  Sixty-second  General 
Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  at  pages  825  to 
830,  inclusive, 

I  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  consider  the 
erection  of  an  appropriate  Memorial  Armory  building  irx  Jeffer- 
son City,  Missouri,  to  provide  for  State  military  needs  and  to 
contain  a  museum  to  house  the  standards,  colors,  trophies, 
records,  relics,  and  mementos  of  all  past  wars  in  which  Mis- 
souri citizens  have  been  engaged.  Such  a  structure,  noble 
in  design  and  adequate  to  its  purpose*  will  be  a  fitting  tribute 
to  our  heroic  dead,  while  serving  the  practical  purposes  of  the 
present  and  the  future. 

The  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  enacted  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  44,  providing  for  the 
appointment  by  the  Governor  of  a  commission  to  make  a 
study  of  the  facilities  of  the  Missouri  State  School  at  Marshall; 
to  study  the  proper  type  of  building  or  buildings  for  that 
institution;  to  consider  the  acquisition  of  an  additional  site 
for  another  institution  to  be  established  for  similar  purposes; 
to  study  the  proper  type  of  building  or  buildinp  to  be  erected 
on  said  additional  site;  to  determine  the  cost  of  constructing 
and  equipping  such  institution  or  institutions;  and  requiring 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  25 

a  report  of  such  study  to  the  Governor  and  the  General  Assem- 
bly and  providing  for  recommendations  by  the  Governor. 

A  report  of  the  study  of  the  Missouri  State  School  by  the 
commission  so  appointed  was  made,  printed,  and  delivered 
to  the  members  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly.  Copies 
of  this  report  will  be  delivered  to  the  members  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly.  A  survey  of  the  buildings  at  the 
Missouri  State  School  at  Marshall  has  also  been  made  by  the 
Director  of  Public  Buildings.  I  suggest  that  you  give  serious 
consideration  to  the  recommendations  contained  in  the  report 
of  the  committee  appointed  as  aforesaid,  and  also  the  report 
of  the  Director  of  Public  Buildings,  and  I  recommend  that 
appropriations  be  made  by  this  General  Assembly  for  the 
construction  of  buildings  recommended  in  said  reports. 

ELEEMOSYNARY  INSTITUTIONS 

In  my  inaugural  message  to  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly  I  stated: 

"Many  problems  arise  from  the  operation  of  our  eleemosy- 
nary institutions.  They  ate  the  fault  of  an  antiquated 
system.  Some  of  the  problems  have  existed  for  years. 
Overcrowding,  limitation  of  vitally  needed  facilities,  under- 
paid and  inadequate  staffs,  all  add  to  the  problem  con- 
fronting us  in  the  administration  of  eleemosynary  affairs. 

"We  may  soon  be  called  upon  to  distinguish  between 
custodial  care  for  senile  patients  and  the  necessity  of 
emphasizing  curative  treatment  for  those  who  may  be 
completely  restored  to  mental  health.  ...  I  suggest 
that  this  General  Assembly,  through  appropriate  com- 
mittees and  with  the  assistance  of  the  Committee  on 
Legislative  Research,  make  a  factual  study  of  the  admin- 
istration and  operation  of  the  penal  and  eleemosynary 
institutions  to  the  end  that  legislation  may  be  enacted  to 
remedy  conditions  found  to  exist/* 

No  such  factual  study  was  made. 

Our  State  hospitals  are  overcrowded  and  have  waiting 
lists*  An  appropriation  will  be  requested  of  this  General 
Assembly  for  infirmary  buildings  at  State  Hospital  No,  2  at 
St*  Joseph;  State  Hospital  No.  3  at  Nevada;  and  State  Hospital 


26  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

No.  4  at  Farmington.  These  requests  for  appropriations  for 
additional  infirmary  buildings  emphasize  what  I  stated  in  my 
inaugural  message,  "We  may  soon  be  called  upon  to  distinguish 
between  custodial  care  for  senile  patients  and  the  necessity  of 
emphasizing  curative  treatment  for  those  who  may  be  com- 
pletely restored  to  mental  health."  Before  these  appropria- 
tions are  made,  I  recommend  a  re-study  of  the  entire  State 
Hospital  situation.  Said  study  should  include  the  manner  of 
admission  of  patients  to  such  institutions;  staffing  of  such 
institutions,  as  to  their  attendants  and  physicians;  informa- 
tion in  regard  to  the  physical  set-up  of  the  institutions,  includ- 
ing the  adequacy  or  inadequacy  of  buildings  and  equipment; 
in  fact,  a  general  survey  of  the  institutions.  One  of  the  pres- 
ent causes  of  the  overcrowded  conditions  at  our  hospitals  is 
the  practice  of  sending  senile  people  to  these  institutions  who 
are  not  mental  cases  as  such  and  who  formerly  were  kept  in 
county  homes.  This  has  been  done  to  a  great  extent  by  the 
counties  because  they  have  been  able  to  send  these  people  to 
the  State  Hospitals  at  a  cost  of  $6.00  per  month  per  patient 
This  present  cost  of  $6.00  per  month  to  the  county  represents 
only  a  small  fraction  of  the  actual  cost  and  is  cheaper  than  the 
county  itself  can  support  them.  This  has  resulted  in  over- 
crowding the  State  Hospitals  and  has  caused  long  waiting 
lists  of  patients,  some  of  whom  are  genuine  mental  cases  who 
might  possibly  be  cured  if  they  could  be  received  and  treated 
in  a  State  Hospital 

I  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  amend  Section 
9328  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended 
by  Senate  Bill  No,  284  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly, 
by  striking  out  the  provision  of  $6,00  per  month  per  patient 
contained  therein  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  sum  of 
$25,00  per  month  per  patient,  or  some  amount  that  will  be 
more  in  proportion  to  the  actual  cost  of  maintaining  a  patient 
in  the  State  Hospitals. 

I  believe  that  drastic  changes  should  be  made  in  the 
operation  of  our  State  Hospitals  to  the  end  that  they  cease 
to  be  custodial  institutions  for  senile  people  and  that  more 
emphasis  be  laid  on  treating  those  who  are  mentally  ill. 

I  recommend  that  serious  consideration  be  given  to 
amending  the  law  in  regard  to  the  qualification  of  the  super- 
intendents of  the  State  Hospitals.  The  present  law  requires 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  27 

the  superintendents  to  be  skilled  in  the  practice  of  medicine 
and  in  the  treatment  of  mental  diseases.  The  superintendents 
also  have  complete  charge,  control,  and  management  of  the 
entire  institution.  It  is  doubtful  whether  a  physician  who 
acts  as  superintendent  should  also  be  the  business  manager. 
I  believe  the  business  management  of  each  hospital  should 
be  in  charge  of  a  layman,  and  each  physician  should  give  his 
entire  time  and  attention  to  the  patients. 

It  is  my  intention  to  approve  appropriations  for  nec- 
essary additions,  repairs,  replacements,  and  for  operations,  in 
order  to  improve  the  State  Hospitals. 

TRAINING  SCHOOLS 

In  order  to  make  possible  a  modernization  in  buildings, 
equipment  and  program  at  the  Training  School  for  Girls  at 
Chillicothe,  the  Training  School  for  Negro  Girls  at  Tipton  and 
the  Training  School  for  Boys  at  Boonville,  I  offer  the  follow- 
ing suggestions  for  your  consideration: 

At  the  present  time  there  are  thirty-one  (31)  girls  at  the 
Training  School  for  Girls  at  Tipton.  At  times  there  have 
been  less  than  this  number.  I  suggest  that  the  Negro  girls 
at  this  institution  be  transferred  to  the  Training  School  for 
Girls  at  Chillicothe.  Housing  facilities  for  these  girls  at  the 
Training  School  for  Girls  at  Chillicothe  can  be  provided  at  a 
cost  to  the  State  that  will  not  be  excessive. 

The  Training  School  for  Boys  at  Boonville  is  situated  on 
603  acres  of  land  already  owned  by  the  State.  It  has  one  of 
the  most  outstanding  dairies  in  the  State.  There  are  several 
usable  buildings,  including  a  fine  gymnasium.  Some  of  the 
present  buildings  could  be  economically  remodeled  for  voca- 
tional and  other  uses;  others  could  be  eliminated  entirely  and 
it  is  my  thought  that  with  a  minimum  expenditure  this  insti- 
tution could  be  modernized  for  the  older  juvenile  group  of 
boys* 

It  is  my  conviction  that  the  institutions  for  the  younger 
boys  and  the  older  boys  should  be  separate,  and  the  younger 
boys  completely  separated  from  the  influence  and  contacts  of 
the  older  boys.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the  older  boys  should 
be  kept  at  the  Boonville  institution  and  this  institution  mod* 
eraiaed  for  this  purpose;  and  the  institution  at  Tipton  should 


28  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

be  modernized  in  every  particular  and  the  younger  boys 
transferred  to  this  institution. 

In  offering  these  suggestions  I  have  considered  the  type 
of  children  who  are  committed  to  the  Training  School  for 
Boys  at  Boonville.  They  range  from  children  of  eight  and 
nine  years  of  age  who  are  committed  primarily  because  of 
neglect  in  their  homes.  These  children  are  not  essentially 
incorrigible  but  need  the  guidance  and  the  discipline  com- 
parable to  that  of  a  model  home  life.  At  the  other  extreme 
are  boys  sixteen  to  seventeen  years  of  age,  who,  because  of 
a  lack  of  training  have  become  potential  criminals.  It  is 
impossible  to  adjust  many  of  them  to  normal  social  attitudes. 

With  reference  to  the  boys  who  would  be  committed  to 
the  Tipton  institution,  it  might  be  advisable  to  amend  our 
laws  so  that  those  committed  to  the  Tipton  institution  would 
be  on  an  indeterminate  sentence,  and  that  the  maximum  com- 
mitment age  to  the  Tiptoix  institution  would  be  placed  at 
thirteen  or  fourteen  years  of  age. 

At  present  there  are  365  boys  at  the  Boonville  institution. 
There  were  as  many  as  491  at  one  time  last  year.  On  the 
present  basis  this  would  mean  there  would  be  approximately 
100  boys  transferred  to  the  Tipton  institution  and  there 
would  be  approximately  265  boys  remaining  at  the  Booaville 
institution. 

I  realize  that  a  new  power  plant  and  other  improvements 
are  needed  at  the  Boonville  institution,  but  this  expenditure 
will  be  necessary  regardless  of  what  this  institution  may  be 
used  for, 

I  believe  that  great  good  can  be  accomplished  by  some 
practical  arrangement  as  above  suggested  and  it  will  not 
involve  an  unreasonable  expenditure  of  money, 

I  recommend  that  legislation  be  enacted  authorizing  the 
Director  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  with  the 
consent  of  the  Governor,  to  transfer  to  the  Penitentiary  or 
to  the  Intermediate  Reformatory  for  Young  Men  at  Algoa 
inmates  of  the  Training  School  for  Boys  at  BoonviUe,  who, 
subsequent  to  their  committal  to  that  institution,  shall  be- 
come incorrigible  and  whose  presence  in  the  institution  appears 
to  be  seriously  detrimental  to  the  welk*bemg  of  the  other 
inmates  of  the  Institution,  Each  person  so  transferred  to  the 
Penitentiary  or  to  the  Intermediate  Reformatory  for  Young 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  29 

Men  should  be  kept  there  subject  to  the  rules  and  discipline 
thereof  until  they  become  eligible  for  release. 

Our  present  statutes  in  regard  to  inmates  escaping  from 
the  penal  institutions  of  this  State  are  inadequate.  Sections 
4306,  4307,  and  4308,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
govern  inmates  escaping  from  the  penal  institutions.  The 
present  statutes  do  not  make  it  a  crime  to  escape  from  Algoa, 
the  Training  Schools  for  Girls  and  the  Training  School  for 
Boys.  In  view  of  the  present  statutes  it  is  impossible  to  extra- 
dite an  inmate  from  another  state  to  which  he  or  she  has  fled. 
I  recommend  that  legislation  be  enacted  to  broaden  the  scope 
of  the  present  statutes  so  that  they  will  include  the  escape  of 
any  inmate  from  the  State  Penitentiary,  Prison  Farms,  Inter- 
mediate Reformatory  for  Young  Men  at  Algoa,  Training 
School  for  Girls  at  Chillicothe,  Training  School  for  Negro 
Girls  at  Tipton,  and  the  Training  School  for  Boys  at  Boon- 
ville,  either  while  confined  therein  or  while  permitted  to  be 
at  large  as  a  trusty.  If  it  were  made  a  crime  to  escape  from 
any  of  the  institutions  above  mentioned  I  believe  many 
escapes  would  not  be  undertaken, 

UNIFORM  STATE  LAWS 

I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  give  careful 
consideration  to  the  uniform  or  model  acts  which  were  tenta- 
tively approved  by  the  Missouri  Commissioners  at  the  Na- 
tional Conference  of  Commissioners  on  Uniform  State  Laws 
which  was  recently  held  at  Philadelphia.  I  direct  attention 
to  the  fact  that  the  General  Assembly  should  study  the  enact- 
ment of  uniform  legislation  in  order  that  Missouri  may  co- 
operate with  her  sister  states  and  join  with  the  Council  of 
State  Governments  on  matters  of  vital  interest  to  all. 

FLOOD  CONTROL 

In  a  message  to  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  I 
called  to  the  attention  of  the  General  Assembly  some  of  the 
problems  that  confront  our  State  in  connection  with  the  de- 
velopment ol  the  Missouri  River  Drainage  Basin  under  the 
1944  Flood  Control  Act  of  Congress.  It  was  mentioned  then 
that  the  progress  of  the  development  by  the  Federal  agency 
would  bring  possibilities  and  opportunities  for  post  war  jobs 
as  weU  as  business  opportunities  for  our  citizens. 


30  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

We  are  now  in  the  post  war  period  and  I  again  recom- 
mend to  you  that  you  give  consideration  to  the  need  for  legis- 
lation that  may  be  advantageous  to  our  State  in  the  carrying 
out  of  these  plans  for  the  development  of  the  Missouri  River 
Valley.  During  the  past  year  the  Federal  government  has 
initiated  the  construction  of  a  number  of  dams  in  the  upper 
areas  of  the  Missouri  River,  some  of  them  for  irrigation  and 
reclamation  purposes  as  well  as  for  flood  control  and  naviga- 
tion. The  three  major  dams  on  the  main  course  of  the  river 
are  at  Garrison  in  South  Dakota  and  Oahe  and  Fort  Randall 
in  South  Dakota.  It  is  my  understanding  that  the  Federal 
agencies  plan  to  carry  out  this  work  as  rapidly  as  funds  are 
provided  by  the  Federal  government  for  the  construction  of 
projects  provided  under  the  plan.  As  these  works  progress 
and  are  completed  it  will  bring  this  comprehensive  system 
nearer  to  our  State.  We  should  be  prepared  for  this  and  our 
legislation  should  provide  for  securing  all  the  benefits  that 
may  accrue  to  our  State. 

During  the  past  year  I  have  declined  to  approve  the  con- 
struction of  four  dams  that  were  proposed  for  construction  in 
this  State.  These  were  to  be  located  at  Pattonsburg,  Hickory, 
and  Osceola,  which  are  in  the  Missouri  River  Drainage  Area; 
and  at  Waco  in  Southwest  Missouri,  outside  the  Missouri 
River  Drainage  Area.  I  intend  to  approve  the  construction 
of  the  dam  proposed  on  the  Pomme  DeTerre  River. 

There  may  be  need  for  legislation  on  a  statewide,  com- 
prehensive basis  providing  rights-of-way  and  easements  for 
levees  and  other  work  along  the  rivers  and  streams  in  Mis- 
souri when  it  is  proven  that  the  construction  of  such  works 
are  to  the  advantage  of  our  citizens  as  well  as  our  neighbor- 
ing states,  and  when  it  is  shown  that  the  overall  benefits  to 
be  received  from  such  developments  are  greater  than  the 
damage  that  would  result  from  such  construction. 

Your  attention  is  also  called  to  the  report  of  the  committee 
of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  which  made  a  study  of 
the  Tennessee  River  Valley  and  the  Missouri  River  Valley, 
In  that  report,  dated  November  28,  1945,  it  is  noted  that 
this  committee  made  recommendations  for  further  study  of 
the  Federal  plan  for  the  development  of  the  Missouri  River 
Basin  as  provided  for  under  the  1944  Flood  Control  Act,  aud 
found  that  there  is  need  for  basin-wide  control,  development, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  31 

and  utilization  of  the  water  resources  of  the  Missouri  Valley. 
I  recommend  that  you  give  consideration  to  the  recommenda- 
tions of  that  committee  in  connection  with  flood  control 
problems. 

It  is  suggested  that  this  General  Assembly  give  further 
serious  thought  to  problems  pertaining  to  the  conservation  of 
our  soil,  preservation  of  our  wild  life,  adequate  flood  control, 
and  the  erection  and  maintenance  of  structures  where  nec- 
essary that  will  bring  the  greatest  good  to  our  State  and  enable 
us  to  cooperate  with  the  Federal  government  in  carrying  out 
sound  programs  of  flood  control  on  our  streams. 

UNDERGROUND  WATER  RESOURCES 

The  underground  water  resources  of  Missouri  are  of  vital 
importance  to  everyone,  and  the  proper  development  and 
conservation  of  these  resources  is  essential  to  the  State's 
progress. 

In  certain,  localities,  such  as  Columbia,  Lebanon,  Spring- 
field, Carthage,  Joplin,  and  Rolla,  the  existing  ground  water 
supplies  have  been  developed  to  a  point  where  detailed  inves- 
tigations should  be  made  to  determine  what  possible  conser- 
vation, measures  should  be  taken  to  permit  the  fullest  utiliza- 
tion of  the  available  water. 

In  other  localities,  such  as  St.  Glair,  Fredericktown,  Mans- 
field, Mountain  View,  Jefferson  City,  Sedalia,  Warrenton,  and 
Troy,  it  has  not  been  possible  to  develop  large  supplies  of 
ground  water  by  established  practices. 

Only  a  few  years  ago  it  was  possible  to  develop  farm  wells 
at  shallow  depths*  With  the  modernization  of  farm  houses 
and  the  greater  use  of  water  for  livestock  and  dairies,  farm 
wells  are  now  being  drilled  to  greater  depths  and  in  many 
areas  existing  farm  wells  have  had  to  be  deepened* 

There  are  areas  in  the  State,  such  as  at  Vandalia,  Mar- 
shall, and  in  St.  Louis  County,  where  fresh  waters  are  found 
at  shallow  depths,  and  sulfosaline  waters  at  greater  depths, 
In  such  areas  there  have  been  cases  of  contamination  where 
the  deeper  waters  rose  in  a  well  into  the  fresh  water  zones 
due  to  improper  casing  and  plugging.  In  the  mining  district 
of  southwestern  Missouri  artesian  wells  were  not  properly 
cased  and  tremendous  water  resources  were  lost  through 


32  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

pumping  during  mining.  The  State  Geological  Survey  has 
accumulated  much  data  on  the  occurrence  of  underground 
water  and  the  Survey  has  been  of  great  assistance  to  munic- 
ipalities, industry,  an,d  agriculture  in  solving  water  supply 
problems.  But  with  the  ever-increasing  demands  for  water, 
particularly  by  industry,  there  is  now  a  greater  need  for  ex- 
pansion of  the  Geological  Survey's  ground  water  studies  with 
the  utilization  of  modern,  specialized  equipment  and  tech- 
niques. To  this  end  I  recommend  the  appropriation  of  funds 
necessary  to  inaugurate  a  broad  program  of  research  in  ground 
water  to  permit  the  proper  development  and  conservation  of 
this  essential  natural  resource. 


FEDERAL  FUNDS  FOR  AID  TO  THE  NEEDY  BLIND 

Title  X  of  the  Federal  Social  Security  Act,  as  amended, 
provides  for  grants  to  states  for  aid  to  the  needy  blind,  Mis- 
souri is  one  of  three  states  in  the  nation  which  does  not  qualify 
for  aid  to  the  blind  under  this  Federal  program.  The  Mis- 
souri Blind  Pension  program  is  operated  entirely  from  State 
funds  provided  by  a  tax  of  three  cents  on  the  one  hundred 
dollar  valuation  of  all  taxable  property,  and  eligibility  for 
pensions  under  this  program  is  limited  to  those  blind  persons 
who  are  unable  to  distinguish  the  motion  of  a  hand  at  a  dis- 
tance not  greater  than  one  foot  from  the  eye.  For  those 
persons  who  meet  this  visual  test  and  other  requirements  of 
the  State  law,  a  blind  pension  amounting  to  $30.00  per  month 
is  paid.  There  are  many  needy  persons  with  impaired  vision 
who  are  unable  to  earn  a  living,  and  who  are  known  as  the 
economic  or  industrially  blind.  These  persons  do  not  qualify 
for  assistance  under  the  State  program,  due  to  the  require- 
ment of  almost  total  blindness*  A  Federal-State  program  of 
aid  to  the  needy  blind  would  provide  grants  to  the  indus** 
trially  blind,  as  well  as  to  those  at  present  on  State  blind 
pension  rolls,  who  could  qualify  on  the  basis  of  need,  up  to  a 
maximum  of  $45*00  per  month.  Federal  funds  are  available 
through  the  Social  Security  Administration  on  the  same  basis 
as  for  the  old  age  assistance  program.  The  Federal  govern** 
ment  will  pay  $10*00  of  the  first  $15*00  granted  to  a  person 
qualifying  for  aid  to  the  blind  and  wiU  match  state  funds 
thereafter  up  to  a  maximum  of  $45*00,  In  other  words,  on 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  33 

a  $45.00  grant,  the  Federal  government  would  pay  $25.00  and 
the  State's  share  of  the  grant  would  be  $20.00.  I  recommend 
that  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  enact  legislation  that 
will  enable  the  State  of  Missouri  to  qualify  for  Federal  aid 
.to  the  needy  blind  under  Title  X  of  the  Social  Security  Act, 
as  amended. 

The  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  enacted  House  Bill 
No.  190  amending  Section  9452,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  providing  that  blind  persons  shall  receive  a  pension  of 
$360,00  per  annum  payable  monthly,  and  providing  that  after 
June  30,  1947,  said  pension  shall  be  $300.00  per  annum  pay- 
able monthly. 

If  this  General  Assembly  does  not  enact  legislation  to 
enable  the  State  of  Missouri  to  qualify  for  Federal  aid  to  the 
needy  blind,  as  above  suggested,  then  I  recommend  that  the 
proviso  in  Section  9452  be  amended  to  extend  after  June  30, 
1947,  to  such  time  as  the  General  Assembly  may  deem 
advisable. 

ADMINISTRATION 

Due  to  a  change  in  Federal  legislation  which  became 
effective  October  1,  1946,  the  Division  of  Welfare  will  receive 
approximately  $100,000*00  less  Federal  money  for  adminis- 
trative expenses  during  this  fiscal  year  than  was  anticipated 
when  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  passed  the  adminis- 
trative appropriations.  This  presents  a  serious  problem  with 
respect  to  administration  of  the  welfare  programs.  The 
reduction  in  Federal  funds  for  this  fiscal  year  will  necessarily 
curtail  the  services  which  the  Division  of  Welfare  can  render 
to  the  needy  aged,  dependent  children,  and  those  on  relief 
rolls*  It  is  my  recommendation  that  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly  provide  additional  funds  for  administration  of  the 
welfare  programs  for  this  fiscal  year  in  an  amount  which  will 
give  the  Welfare  Division  as  much  money  for  administration, 
as  would  have  been  received  had  there  been  no  change  in  the 
Federal  Social  Security  Law- 
Am  TO  DEPENDENT  CHILDBEN  AND  GENERAL  BELIEF 

Appropriations  for  aid  to  dependent  children  and  general 
relief  lor  the  current  fiscal  year  are  not  sufficient  to  meet  in 
fuU  the  needs  of  persons  eligible  for  assistance  tinder  these 


34  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

programs,  and  consequently  it  has  been  necessary  to  reduce 
monthly  grants  for  such  persons  to  a  point  far  below  the 
amounts  determined  to  be  needed  on  a  basis  of  decency  and 
health  as  provided  by  State  law.  I  recommend  that  the 
Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  give  serious  consideration  to 
an  appropriation  for  additional  funds  for  this  fiscal  year  to 
enable  the  Division  of  Welfare  to  meet  the  needs  of  dependent 
children  within  the  limits  of  the  maximum  grants  established 
by  Federal  and  State  statutes,  and  to  make  grants  to  unem- 
ployable persons  on  relief  rolls  on  a  basis  of  decency  and  health 
as  provided  by  State  law. 

ESCHEATS 

In  1941  the  General  Assembly  enacted  a  statute  (Section 
5985 A,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  396)  which  provided  that 
all  funds  remaining  in  the  hands  of  the  Superintendent  of 
Insurance  from  impoundments  in  any  rate  review  case,  the 
owners  of  which  could  not  be  found  or  located,  should  escheat 
and  vest  in  the  State  of  Missouri.  This  statute  is  effective  as 
to  any  funds  which  are  in  the  hands  of  the  Superintendent  of 
Insurance  for  distribution  to  policyhojders.  However,  the 
statute  is  not  broad  enough  to  cover  funds  not  in  the  hands 
of  the  Superintendent  of  Insurance  and  which  belong  to  policy- 
holders  who  cannot  be  located*  There  is  now  impounded  in 
the  Federal  Court  for  the  Western  District  of  Missouri  a  large 
fund  which  has  been  adjudged  by  that  Court  to  belong  to  the 
policyholders  from  whom  it  was  collected.  This  fund  is  in 
the  custody  of  a  custodian  appointed  by  the  Federal  Court, 
and  said  custodian  is  undertaking  to  locate  the  policyholders 
entitled  to  said  fund  and  is  distributing  the  fund  under  orders 
of  the  Federal  Court,  However,  it  is  apparent  from  the  fact 
that  the  rate  litigation  has  been  in  progress  in  the  Federal 
Court  for  nearly  sixteen  years  and  from  the  history  of  dis- 
tributions of  similar  funds,  that  the  custodian  appointed  by 
the  Federal  Court  will  not  be  able  to  distribute  aU  of  said 
fund*  The  result  will  be  that  there  will  be  a  large  fund  left 
in  the  custody  of  the  Federal  Court  which  belongs  to  parties 
who  cannot  be  located* 

The  distribution  of  approximately  $8»265,0G0,00  to  the 
policyholders  of  Missouri  began  about  August,  1944.  At  the 
present  time  the  custodian  of  the  fund  for  the  Federal  Court 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  35 

has  mailed  checks  to  policyholders  totalling  approximately 
$5,000,000.00.  Checks  amounting  to  approximately  $1,000,- 
000.00  have  not  been  cashed.  There  still  remains  approxi- 
mately $3,000,000.00  which  the  custodian  is  now  attempting 
to  return  to  the  policyholders.  As  time  goes  on  it  becomes 
more  difficult  to  find  the  policyholders. 

I  am  advised  by  the  Attorney  General  that  the  common 
law  on  escheats  in  Missouri  is  not  well  enough  defined  to 
effect  the  escheating  of  this  undistributed  fund  to  the  State 
of  Missouri  and  also  that  the  present  escheat  statutes  of  the 
State  are  not  sufficiently  broad  to  cover  funds  of  the  type  now 
impounded  in  the  Federal  Court  as  above  mentioned.  Unless 
proper  legislation  is  passed,  I  am  advised  that  said  funds  may 
eventually  be  transferred  to  the  United  States  Treasury  and 
be  lost  to  the  State  of  Missouri.  Since  the  fund  was  collected 
principally  from  citizens  of  Missouri  and  all  from  insurance 
business  carried  on  in  Missouri,  this  State  should  have  first 
claim  to  such  portion  of  said  funds  as  cannot  be  returned  to 
its  proper  owners. 

In  view  of  this  situation,  I  recommend  that  the  General 
Assembly  enact  proper  statutes  to  provide  for  the  escheating 
to  the  State  of  Missouri  of  funds  such  as  those  described. 

STRIKES 

During  recent  years  labor  has  won  many  long  overdue 
rights  to  which  they  were  entitled.  The  right  of  employees  in 
private  industry  to  organize  and  bargain  collectively  through 
representatives  of  their  own  choosing  is  recognized  by  law 
and  should  be  preserved.  But  all  rights  carry  with  them 
corresponding  responsibilities  and  duties*  Labor  unions  should 
recognize  and  live  up  to  these  responsibilities,  and  should  be 
held  legally  responsible  for  their  contractual  obligations.  In 
addition  I  recommend  that  legislation  be  enacted  to  prevent 
labor  strikes  which  affect  the  lives,  health,  or  safety  of  the 
general  public,  or  challenge  the  sovereignty  of  the  State 
government, 

EMERGENCY  APPROPRIATION 

In  view  of  the  recent  controversy  which  the  State  of  Mis- 
souri has  had  with  the  Labor  Department  at  Washington 
relative  to  the  transfer  of  the  Employment  Services  to  Mis* 


36  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATION'S  OF 

souri,  I  suggest  that  an  appropriation  be  made  to  the  Gover- 
nor to  be  used  for  emergency  purposes  in  case  some  department 
of  the  Federal  government  should  arbitrarily  cut  off  Federal 
funds  from  the  State  of  Missouri,  in  which  event  this  emer- 
gency fund  so  appropriated  could  be  used  to  carry  on  the 
functions  of  State  government  until  the  controversy  could  be 
adjusted. 

AGBIGULTURE 

I  recommend  that  legislation  be  enacted  revising  our  laws 
pertaining  to  the  interstate  and  intrastate  movement  of  live- 
stock and  poultry  in  order  to  cope  with  present  day  transpor- 
tation methods.  This  State  is  serving  as  a  dumping  ground 
for  diseased  animals  from  border  states  due  to  some  of  the 
exemptions  written  into  the  present  statutes.  A  strengthen- 
ing of  the  quarantine  provisions  of  our  statutes,  in  order  to 
exercise  better  control  of  the  transportation  and  sale  of  dis- 
eased animals  is  desirable. 

I  suggest  that  funds  be  appropriated  to  the  Agricultural 
Extension  Service,  the  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  and 
the  State  Department  of  Agriculture,  in  order  to  permit  these 
agencies  to  cooperate  with  the  Federal  government  in  a  com- 
prehensive and  coordinated  program  of  marketing  research 
and  marketing  service  under  the  provisions  of  Public  Law  733, 
known  as  the  Hope-Flanuagan  Agricultural  Marketing  Bill. 

Soil  improvement  is  a  most  important  topic  in  the  minds 
of  farm  people  in  Missouri  today.  All  agencies.  Federal, 
State,  and  private,  should  be  urged  to  join  hands  with  farm 
owners  in  this  very  successful  program.  Enabling  legislation 
that  will  encourage  or  expedite  such  a  program  is  timely* 

It  is  recommended  that  further  encouragement  be  ex- 
tended to  rural  communities  in  the  building  and  improvement 
of  Farm-to-Market  Roads.  It  is  estimated  that  the  volume 
of  rural  automobile  travel  in  the  United  States  will  increase 
between  forty  and  fifty  per  cent  within  the  next  fifteen  years, 
Missouri  should  prepare  for  this  expansion.  Adequate  funds 
should  be  provided  by  the  General  Assembly  to  implement 
rural  road  building  programs, 

MOTOE  VEHICLE  LAWS 

I  recommend  that  Chapter  45t  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis* 
souri,  1939,  relating  to  motor  vehicles,  be  amended  to  provide 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  37 

for  the  compulsory  periodic  inspection  of  all  motor  vehicles 
licensed  and  operated  in  the  State  of  Missouri  to  determine 
the  mechanical  fitness  of  the  vehicle  and  of  the  safety  devises 
[devices]  required,  as  set  forth  in  Sections  8386  to  8390,  inclu- 
sive, Chapter  45,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 

I  recommend  that  Chapter  45,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  the  Motor  Vehicle  Law  and  the  Driver's 
License  Law  be  amended  to  provide  that  no  license  shall  be 
issued  to  any  applicant  to  drive  a  motor  vehicle  on  the  high- 
ways of  this  State  who  has  not  successfully  passed  a  prescribed 
driver's  examination. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  confusion  exists  in  the  definition 
of  a  chauffeur  and  a  registered  operator  in  Section  8372,  as 
reenacted  and  Section  8373,  Chapter  45,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  I  recommend  that  said  statutes  be  amended 
so  that  the  registered  operators  shall  be  included  in  Section 
8372  which  provides  for  the  registration  of  chauffeurs,  or  that 
the  registration  of  operators  be  discontinued  and  that  those 
persons  who  now  come  under  the  provisions  of  Section  8373, 
Chapter  45,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  be  required 
to  have  only  a  driver's  license, 

I  realize  that  some  persons  have  criticized  our  Driver's 
License  Law.  They  claim  the  present  law  has  no  "teeth." 
The  fact  is  that  the  present  Driver's  License  Law  has  pro- 
visions which  are  so  strict  that  the  prosecuting  attorneys 
charge  the  violator  with  a  lesser  offense  instead  of  enforcing 
the  strict  provisions  of  the  statute.  I  know  how  difficult  it 
was  to  pass  the  present  Driver's  License  Law  at  the  1937 
Session  of  the  General  Assembly.  I  believe  that  the  present 
law  can  be  so  amended  that  better  enforcement  will  result 
and  that  traffic  accidents  on  the  highways  will  be  greatly 
reduced. 

I  suggest  that  serious  consideration  be  given  to  a  system 
of  staggered  permanent  registration  of  motor  vehicles*  This 
will  do  away  with  a  volume  of  registrations  at  the  first  of  each 
year;  reduce  the  cost  of  administration;  and  reduce  the  cost 
of  materials  used  in  processing  the  license  tags. 

EDUCATION 

The  condition  of  our  schools  should  have  the  continuing 
concern  of  the  General  Assembly*  The  war  created  many 


38  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

new  problems  for  education.  Many  of  our  institutions  of 
learning  are  crowded  to  capacity.  Thousands  of  veterans 
exercising  their  rights  under  Federal  legislation  have  returned 
to  the  classroom.  Courses  of  study,  instructional  staffs,  hous- 
ing, and  school  facilities  of  all  kinds  have  felt  the  impact  of 
these  conditions.  Consideration  should  be  given  to  the  needs 
brought  about  by  these  conditions. 

Under  the  authority  of  the  1945  Constitution,  and  Senate 
Bill  No.  256  passed  by  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly,  the 
supervision  of  instruction  in  the  public  schools  of  Missouri  is 
now  vested  in  a  State  Board  of  Education.  One  of  the  duties 
of  that  Board,  as  provided  in  said  bill,  is  "to  cause  to  be 
assembled  such  information  relative  to  the  public  schools  in 
the  State  as  will  reflect  continuously  their  condition  and 
management."  This  Board  of  Education  is  now  functioning 
and  will,  no  doubt,  submit  reports  of  its  studies.  It  is  recom- 
mended that  the  General  Assembly  consider  these  reports  and 
initiate  such  action  as  may  be  deemed  appropriate  and  nec- 
essary to  the  end  that  education  in  Missouri  may  be  kept 
abreast  of  the  times. 

VETERANS 

Missouri's  concern  for  the  war  veteran  is  evidenced  by 
the  manner  in  which  State  resources,  facilities,  and  institu- 
tions have  been  made  available  in  programs  of  assistance, 
guidance,  and  training.  Service  officers  throughout  the  State 
maintain  contact  with  the  veterans  of  their  locality  and  thou- 
sands of  them  have  been  aided  in  securing  all  the  benefits 
which  have  been  granted  to  them  by  Federal  law,  Personnel 
of  various  State  departments  and  institutions  are  giving  of 
their  time  and  effort  on  behalf  of  the  veteran*  All  of  these 
State  agencies  and  employees  cooperate  fully  with  Federal 
agencies,  departments,  and  bureaus  and  with  veterans  organi- 
zations, in  plans  and  programs  of  mutual  assistance  for  the 
veteran's  benefit.  These  efforts  should  be  continued  and 
should  be  adequately  supported. 

CONCLUSION 

In  submitting  the  information,  suggestions,  and  recom- 
mendations contained  in  this  message  to  the  members  of  the 
General  Assembly,  I  am  deeply  conscious  of  our  joint  retpon* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  39 

sibility  to  the  people  of  Missouri.  They  have  elected  us  to 
serve  them  during  a  crucial  and  most  important  period  in  our 
history.  If  their  welfare  and  the  further  advancement  of  this 
great  State  motivates  our  deliberations  and  actions,  and  if 
we  strive  together  to  promote  the  interests  of  Missouri  and 
its  citizens,  surely  we  can  make  the  coming  months  a  time  of 
real  achievement.  In  that  spirit,  I  extend  once  more  to  the 
members  of  the  General  Assembly  the  hand  of  fellowship  and 
of  friendship.  In  the  words  of  a  great  statesman,  let  us  do 
the  right  as  God  grants  us  to  see  the  right,  and  let  us  be  con- 
tent with  nothing  less  than  our  best  efforts  on  behalf  of  the 
State  we  all  love. 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 

Governor. 
January  8,  1947. 


40  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

SECOND  BIENNIAL  MESSAGE 

JANUARY  5,  1949 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  19-34 


To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty-fifth 
General  Assembly: 

The  Constitution  requires  the  Governor  at  the  close  of 
his  term  of  office  to  give  to  the  General  Assembly  information 
as  to  the  state  of  the  government  and  also  to  recommend  for 
its  consideration  such  measures  as  he  shall  deem  necessary 
and  expedient. 

It  is  in  the  discharge  of  this  constitutional  duty  that  I 
submit  to  you  the  following  information,  suggestions,  and 
recommendations ; 

The  State  of  Missouri  is  in  a  sound  financial  condition. 
The  cash  balance  in  the  State  Treasury  in  the  General  Reve- 
nue Fund  as  of  December  31,  1948,  was  $21,750,000.00,  The 
balance  in  the  Post  War  Fund  as  of  that  date  was  $29,202,- 
152.00.  The  major  part  of  this  Fund  is  earmarked  for  the 
construction  of  buildings  at  the  State  educational,  penal,  and 
eleemosynary  institutions.  However,  it  is  anticipated  there 
will  be  a  balance  in  the  Post  War  Fund  as  of  June  30,  1949, 
of  approximately  Ten  Million  Dollars. 

No  reference  to  the  executive  budget  will  be  made  in  this 
message.  In  any  year  in  which  a  governor-elect  assumes 
office,  the  budget  shall  be  the  budget  of  the  new  Governor 
and  shall  be  submitted  to  the  General  Assembly  by  him.  This 
is  required  to  be  done  within  thirty  days  after  the  General 
Assembly  convenes  in  each  regular  session, 

When  I  assumed  the  duties  of  Governor  we  were  in  the 
throes  of  World  War  IL  It  was  terminated  during  the  year 
1945.  Its  termination  imposed  many  additional  duties  and 
obligations  upon  the  Governor  and  departments  of  the  State 
government. 

In  1945  a  new  Constitution  for  Missouri  was  adopted  by 
the  qualified  voters  of  the  State-  This  imposed  many  addi- 
tional duties  upon  the  Governor  and  the  General  Assembly. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  41 

It  was  necessary  for  the  General  Assembly  to  repeal  or  amend 
many  sections  of  our  statutory  laws  in  compliance  with  the 
provisions  of  the  new  Constitution;  also,  in  many  instances 
new  legislation  was  necessary.  As  a  result  there  were  over 
one  thousand  laws  enacted  to  implement  the  new  Constitution. 
This  is  a  matter  of  record  and  time  and  space  in  this  message 
will  not  permit  comment  in  regard  to  all  such  legislation. 
However,  it  is  proper  to  say  that  although  new  departments 
of  the  State  government  were  created  and  other  departments 
were  consolidated  or  abolished,  the  regular  business  of  the 
State  was  carried  on  during  all  the  period  that  such  changes 
were  being  made. 

Now  that  the  reorganization  of  the  State  government  has 
been  completed  it  is  my  opinion  that  with  adequate  appro- 
priations and  adequate  trained  personnel  the  departments  of 
the  State  government  will  be  on  a  more  efficient  and  econom- 
ical basis  and  much  benefit  will  be  derived  by  the  taxpayers 
by  reason  of  the  adoption  of  the  new  Constitution, 

In  my  message  to  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
January  8,  1945,  with  reference  to  requests  for  new  buildings 
and  repairs  for  buildings  already  erected  at  the  State  insti- 
tutions, I  made  the  following  statement: 

"I  recommend  for  your  consideration  the  establishment 
of  a  State  agency  .  .  *  where  experienced  personnel 
would  have  charge  of  the  erection  of  new  buildings  and 
the  repairing  and  remodeling  the  buildings  already  erected. 
In  this  way  institutions  which  are  iix  need  of  new  build- 
ings or  which  have  buildings  in  need  of  repair  will  be 
able  to  have  this  done  and  the  unneeded  construction  of 
buildings  will  be  prevented.  It  will  also  stop  the  practice 
of  institutions  coming  before  you  competing  with  each 
other  for  new  buildings/' 

Such  a  State  agency  has  not  been  created*  The  State  is  now 
engaged  in  a  building  program  at  Missouri  University,  Lin- 
coln University,  the  Teachers  Colleges,  the  State  Colleges, 
and  the  eleemosynary  and  penal  institutions.  Appropriations 
have  been  made  for  the  construction  of  buildings  at  these 
Institutions*  However,  at  the  eleemosynary  and  penal  insti- 
tutions there  is  no  definite  authority  provided  by  law  to  secure 
architectural  services,  let  contracts,  and  supervise  the  con- 


42  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

struction  of  said  buildings.  The  State  Purchasing  Agent  has 
no  authority  to  negotiate  contracts  for  the  construction  of 
buildings.  I  recommend  that  a  building  commission  be  estab- 
lished with  definite  authority  provided  by  law  to  secure  archi- 
tectural services,  let  contracts  and  supervise,  through  the 
director  of  the  Division  of  Public  Buildings,  the  construction 
of  new  buildings  at  the  eleemosynary  and  penal  institutions. 
Also,  that  the  office  of  the  Purchasing  Agent  be  utilized  in 
the  advertising  for  bids  and  the  awarding  of  contracts  under 
the  direction  of  the  building  commission. 

Advertising  for  bids  for  public  buildings  is  controlled  by 
Section  14939,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  This  sec- 
tion should  be  amended  so  the  cost  of  advertising  for  bids 
may  be  decreased  and  a  larger  number  of  contractors  be  given 
notice  not  only  through  newspapers  but  also  through  recog- 
nized and  established  trade  publications. 

In  January,  1945,  the  buildings  and  physical  property  at 
the  State  institutions  and  farms  were  badly  in  need  of  repair. 
Much  improvement  has  been  made  and  I  feel  that  the  build- 
ings and  other  physical  property  at  the  institutions  and  farms 
are  in  a  good  state  of  repair  and  that  the  appropriations  for 
this  purpose  have  been  well  spent. 

New  buildings  have  been  constructed  or  are  under  con* 
struction  at  the  following  institutions  on  which  full  detailed 
information  may  be  obtained  from  the  Director  of  Public 
Buildings: 

Occupational  Therapy  Buildings  are  under  construction 
at  each  of  the  four  State  Hospitals;  Infirmary  Buildings  at 
two  of  the  State  Hospitals;  a  new  well  has  been  completed 
at  one  Hospital  and  a  well  has  been  contracted  for  at  one 
other  Hospital;  staff  cottages  are  either  completed  or  under 
construction  at  two  of  the  Hospitals;  farm  buildings,  includ- 
ing calf  bam,  farm  dormitory,  and  dairy  farm  residence,  are 
being  constructed  at  two  Hospitals;  store  buildings  are  under 
construction  at  two  Hospitals;  a  garage  and  machine  shop 
has  been  completed  at  one  Hospital;  fireproofing  one  building 
at  State  Hospital  No*  4  is  under  construction;  a  contract  has 
been  let  at  Hospital  No*  3  for  alternations  to  the  Power  Plant 
Building;  Hospital  No*  4  has  completed  an  addition  to  their 
Sewage  Disposal  Plant  and  work  is  progressing  on  utility 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  43 

tunnel  and  lines;  additional  farm  lands  have  been  acquired 
at  all  four  Hospitals. 

Dormitories  are  under  contract  at  the  Missouri  State 
Schools  and  the  State  Sanatorium  at  Mt.  Vernon. 

At  the  Southwest  Missouri  State  College,  Springfield,  two 
boilers  and  steam  main  have  been  installed;  contract  has  been 
let  for  girls'  dormitory.  At  the  Southeast  Missouri  State 
College,  Cape  Girardeau,  a  dormitory  and  a  service  center 
have  been  completed.  At  Central  Missouri  State  College, 
Warrensburg,  a  men's  dormitory  has  been  constructed  and  a 
recreation  and  physical  education  building  is  under  construc- 
tion. At  Northwest  Missouri  State  Teachers  College,  Mary- 
ville,  the  heating  system  has  been  reconditioned.  At  the 
Northeast  Missouri  State  Teachers  College,  Kirksville,  two 
girls'  dormitories  are  nearing  completion  and  one  boys'  dormi- 
tory under  contract;  library  building  and  boiler  room  repaired; 
lighting  system  improved. 

At  the  University  of  Missouri,  Columbia,  additions  and 
alterations  have  been  completed  to  the  Veterinary  Science 
Building ;  a  Veterinary  Printing  Building  has  been  constructed; 
Women's  Dormitory  is  under  construction  with  cafeteria  al- 
ready completed;  South  Dormitory  under  construction;  five 
buildings  have  been  completed  at  the  State  Forestry  Camp. 
The  following  projects  have  been  completed:  residence  on 
South  Farm;  Garage  Warehouse;  Underground  Electric  Dis- 
tribution Center;  Climatic  Laboratory;  Residence  and  Seed 
House  at  Field  Crops  Experimental  Farm  at  Sikeston;  Under- 
pass for  Students  under  9th  Street  in  Columbia;  Football  field 
at  the  University. 

At  the  School  of  Mines  and  Metallurgy,  Rolla,  power 
plant  constructed,  generators  purchased  but  not  installed; 
Chemistry  Building  constructed,  and  contract  let  for  men's 
dormitory* 

At  Lincoln  University,  Jefferson  City,  one  Library  Build- 
ing is  under  construction* 

The  Training  Schools  at  Boonvilie  and  Chillicothe  are 
constructing  dormitories  and  repairing  or  building  boiler 
houses;  a  reception  cottage  is  under  contract  at  Boonville  and 
work  is  under  way  on  the  construction  of  an  additional  unit 
to  the  present  Administration  Building, 


44  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

The  construction  and  equipping  of  a  Diesel  Electric  Plant 
at  the  State  Penitentiary  is  eighty-five  per  cent  complete; 
at  the  Intermediate  Reformatory  a  dairy  barn  and  two  silos 
have  been  completed;  a  machine  shed  and  slaughter  house 
have  been  constructed  without  cost  to  the  State  except  for 
the  roofing;  two  barns,  two  corn  bins,  three  stock  sheds,  and 
a  machine  shed  have  been  constructed  at  the  Church  Farm 
at  little  cost  to  the  State  other  than,  the  metal  roofing. 

Major  repairs  consisting  of  reroofing  of  the  main  build- 
ings at  the  Church  Farm,  reroofing  of  the  wall  towers,  the 
chair  factory,  and  the  school  building  at  the  Penitentiary; 
reroofing  of  the  dairy  barn  at  the  Intermediate  Reformatory; 
a  new  cooling  unit  was  installed  in  the  dairy  at  the  Inter- 
mediate Reformatory,  and  windows  and  doors  were  installed 
in  one  of  the  dormitories;  roofing  is  on  order  for  the  mule 
barn  at  the  Intermediate  Reformatory, 

All  of  the  buildings  within  the  Division  of  Penal  Institu- 
tions are  in  a  good  state  of  repair  insofar  as  general  building 
maintenance  is  concerned.  There  are  some  of  the  factory 
buildings,  those  in  the  stockade  and  the  furniture  factory, 
which  are  in  such  condition  that  they  are  beyond  much  im- 
provement by  general  maintenance  repairs.  These  particular 
buildings  should  be  torn  down  and  modern  factory  buildings 
constructed  to  replace  them, 

The  Sixty-second  General  Assembly  authorized  the  con- 
struction of  a  new  State  Office  Building  in  Jefferson  City 
(Laws  of  1943,  page  825).  The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assem- 
bly appropriated  Two  Million  Dollars  for  the  construction  of 
such  building  (Laws  of  1947,  Voi  2»  page  199).  I  approved 
this  appropriation  but  in  so  doing  pointed  out  that  that  part 
of  the  section  which  attempted  to  fix  the  location  of  such 
building  on  the  "State-owned  property  east  of  the  State  Capitol 
Building  on  the  north  side  of  Capitol  Avenue"  was  unconsti- 
tutional in  that  it  was  an  attempt  to  legislate  in  an  appropria- 
tion bill  As  the  appropriation  did  not  provide  for  the  pur- 
chase of  a  site  and  as  I  was  opposed  to  the  erection  of  the 
building  at  the  location  designated  in  the  appropriation  bill, 
no  action  has  been  taken  on  this  appropriation. 

The  site  for  the  new  office  building  has  not  yet  been 
determined,  I  recommend  that  consideration  be  given  to  the 
establishment  of  the  new  building  by  the  use  of  the  present 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  45 

State  Highway  Building  and  extensions  and  additions  thereto, 
that  appropriate  transfer  of  funds  be  made  from  the  post-war 
reserve  fund  to  the  State  Highway  Department  fund,  and 
that  the  State  Highway  Commission  be  authorized  to  pur- 
chase a  site  and  to  construct  a  new  State  Highway  Building 
thereon. 

After  the  new  building  has  been  completed,  I  recommend 
that  the  building  occupied  at  this  time  by  the  Public  Service 
Commission  be  torn  down,  in  accordance  with  the  agreement 
made  at  the  time  the  State  acquired  said  building. 

For  the  accomplishment  of  these  purposes,  general  legis- 
lation, as  well  as  appropriation  acts,  will  have  to  be  enacted 
by  the  General  Assembly. 

During  the  fiscal  period  ending  June  30,  1953,  approxi- 
mately $45,000,000  will  be  available  to  the  State  under  the 
provisions  of  the  Federal-Aid  Highway  Acts  of  1944  and  1948. 
These  funds  must  be  matched  with  State  funds  and  are 
required  to  be  expended  for  construction  as  follows:  45%  on 
the  primary  Federal-aid  system,  30%  on  the  Federal-aid  sec- 
ondary system  (supplementary  State  highways)  and  25%  upon 
the  Federal-aid  urban  area  system  (cities  of  5,000  population 
or  more).  State  highway  revenues  resulting  from  existing 
sources  and  present  rates  of  levy  will  not  be  sufficient  to 
enable  the  State  to  match  all  Federal  funds  available  and, 
therefore,  additional  State  funds  must  be  provided  to  prevent 
the  loss  of  a  substantial  portion  of  the  Federal  allotment. 

The  State  highway  system  now  consists  of  approximately 
17*550  miles,  of  which  9,100  are  supplementary  highways. 
The  State  Highway  Commission  has  full  authority,  under  the 
provisions  of  Section  32,  Article  4,  Constitution  of  1945,  and 
Sections  8767  and  8773,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
to  determine  the  type  and  character  of  construction  of  all 
state  highways  and  to  build  supplementary  state  highways  of 
either  a  high,  intermediate,  or  low  type  depending  upon  the 
volume  and  kind  of  traffic  they  are  expected  to  serve.  Under 
the  Constitution  the  number  of  additions  to  the  supplementary 
State  highway  system  in  each  of  the  counties  is  contingent 
only  upon  funds  available  or  which  may  be  made  available 
by  the  General  Assembly*  In  my  opinion,  the  present  laws 
relating  to  the  commission's  authority  are  adequate  and  all 
that  is  necessary  to  enable  the  commission  to  accelerate  the 


46  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

construction  of  all  types  of  supplementary  state  highways  is 
to  provide  it  with  additional  funds.  Therefore,  I  recommend 
that  the  General  Assembly  consider  increasing  state  highway 
revenues  both  for  these  purposes  and  to  avoid  the  loss  of  the 
Federal  funds  mentioned  above. 

Under  the  provisions  of  the  County  Aid  Road  Law  (Laws 
of  1945,  page  1471,  as  amended  Laws  of  1945,  page  1502,  and 
Laws  of  1947,  Volume  2,  pages  350  and  352),  $10,000,000  was 
transferred  from  the  Post-war  Reserve  Fund  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund  and  $2,000,000  was  appropriated  for  each  of 
the  fiscal  years  1947-1948  and  19484949-  In  the  first  year's 
program  $1,498,945.50  was  expended  upon  1,015  projects, 
totalling  2,776  miles,  in  102  counties,  and  apparently  the  pro- 
gram for  the  current  fiscal  year  will  utilize  about  the  same 
amount.  Reappropriations  by  this  and  subsequent  General 
Assemblies  of  all  unexpended  balances  in  appropriations  for 
county  aid  roads  will  be  necessary  if  the  entire  original  $10,- 
000,000  is  to  be  expended  for  these  purposes,  and  the  program 
can  thus  be  extended  from  five  years  into  a  six-year  program. 

It  is  my  belief  that  there  are  too  many  local  subdivisions 
engaged  in  the  construction  and  maintenance  of  roads  in  Mis- 
souri, involving  inefficient  administration,  untrained  personnel, 
and  duplication  of  effort  and  equipment.  The  number  of 
such  agencies  should  be  greatly  reduced. 

In  my  opinion,  the  State  Highway  Commission  should  be 
made  responsible  for  supervising,  directing,  and  controlling 
the  construction  and  maintenance,  by  the  local  subdivisions, 
of  all  public  roads  outside  the  larger  cities,  Such  super- 
vision, direction,  and  control  should  be  made  more  extensive 
than  that  provided  for  in  the  County  Aid  Road  Law  if  the 
State  and  the  local  subdivisions  are  to  receive  the  maximum 
benefits  from  the  State  Highway  Department's  experience 
and  trained  personnel 

I  call  your  attention  to  the  enormous  loss  which  accrues 
to  the  State  every  year  from  soil  erosion  and  floods*  This 
loss  seriously  detracts  from  the  economic  well-being  of  the 
citizens  of  today  and  will  be  even  more  detrimental  to  the 
ecoaomy  of  future  generations  unless  more  adequate  measures 
are  taken  to  prevent  it*  In  order  to  determine  what  measures 
are  required  it  is  necessary  first  to  conduct  technical  and 
engineering  studies  of  the  problem.  Accordingly  this  admin* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  47 

istration  set  up  procedures  and  initiated  those  studies.  The 
studies  are  based  on  the  principle  that  soil  erosion  and  flood 
problems  are  closely  related  and  that  measures  for  their  pre- 
vention must  be  considered  collectively.  At  the  same  time 
it  is  necessary  to  consider  many  other  items  such  as  minerals, 
forests,  hydroelectric  power,  fish  and  wildlife,  public  health, 
recreation,  and  others.  The  studies  are  a  cooperative  under- 
taking on  the  part  of  the  State  and  Federal  governments. 
Every  State  and  Federal  agency  having  an  interest  in  land 
and  water  resource  development  and  conservation  is  partici- 
pating. By  conducting  the  studies  in  this  manner  we  are 
assured  that  expert  technical  skill  is  available  to  solve  the 
problems  that  exist. 

Obviously  it  is  impossible  to  conduct  these  studies  over 
the  entire  State  at  once.  Therefore,  they  are  being  carried 
out  by  stream  basins.  Studies  have  been  completed  in  the 
Osage  River  Basin.  A  coordinated  plan  has  been  formulated 
which,  if  carried  out,  will  greatly  enhance  the  economy  of  the 
region  by  reducing  soil  erosion  and  flood  losses  and  by  the 
development  of  other  resources.  Studies  are  now  in  progress 
in  the  Grand  River  Basin.  It  is  expected  that  a  similar  plan 
will  be  completed  for  that  Basin  by  the  summer  of  1949. 
At  the  same  time  the  plans  will  afford  important  reduction  of 
floods  on  the  Missouri  and  Mississippi  Rivers. 

I  recommend  that  similar  studies  be  conducted  in  other 
river  basins  of  the  State  and  that  adequate  appropriations  be 
made  for  conducting  the  studies  and  carrying  out  the  plans. 

I  recommend  that  the  laws  pertaining  to  mines  and  min- 
ing and  the  inspection  of  mines  be  revised  and  brought  up  to 
date  in  order  that  the  life,  limb,  and  health  of  those  employed 
in  and  about  the  mines  of  this  State  may  be  fully  protected. 
Also,  that  proper  legislation  be  enacted  governing  lime  min- 
ing and  rock  quarrying  in  order  to  protect  employees  in  such 
mines  from  falling  rock,  bad  air  conditions,  and  other  unhealthy 
or  dangerous  conditions  in  those  operations  as  in  other  types 
of  mining.  Also,  that  provision  be  made  for  the  inspection  of 
such  mines.  There  appears  to  be  no  statutory  definition  of 
what  is  included  in  the  term  "mines."  This  should  be  con- 
sidered in  revising  these  laws. 

It  is  provided  in  Section  47,  Article  3  of  the  1945  Con- 
stitution that  the  General  Assembly  shall  appropriate  out  of 


48  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  General  Revenue  Fund  a  certain  amount,  specified  in  said 
section,  for  the  exclusive  purpose  of  providing  a  State  Park 
Fund  to  be  expended  and  used  by  the  agency  authorized  by 
law  to  control  and  supervise  the  State  parks. 

In  my  opinion  this  section  of  the  Constitution  requires 
the  appropriation  for  State  parks  to  be  made  in  a  lump  sum 
the  same  as  is  provided  for  the  Conservation  Commission  in 
Sections  40  to  46,  inclusive,  Article  4,  Constitution  1945.  I  do 
not  believe  the  General  Assembly  has  authority  to  make 
specific  allotments  from  the  State  Park  Fund  for  Personal 
Service,  Repairs  and  Replacements,  Additions  and  Operation, 

I  recommend  that  hereafter  the  General  Assembly  make 
the  appropriation  for  the  State  Park  Board  in  a  lump  sum  as 
provided  in  Section  47,  Article  3,  of  the  Constitution. 

I  recommend  that  the  number  of  officers  and  patrolmen 
of  the  State  Highway  Patrol  be  increased;  that  Section  8350, 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  979,  be  amended  by  striking 
out  the  words  and  figures  "two  hundred  and  fifteen  (215)" 
and  that  such  maximum  number  of  officers  and  patrolmen  as 
the  General  Assembly  may  deem  sufficient  be  inserted  in  lieu 
thereof. 

It  is  my  opinion  because  of  county  boundaries  and  in* 
adequate  facilities  the  sheriffs  and  local  officers  in  the  counties 
are  unable  to  give  the  citizens  of  Missouri  the  full  protection 
against  law  violators  to  which  they  are  entitled* 

Under  the  present  law  when  the  Superintendent  of  the 
Highway  Patrol  is  required  to  be  out  of  the  State  or  is  attend- 
ing to  his  duties  in  the  State  but  away  from  his  office  in 
Jefferson  City,  it  is  necessary  for  him  to  designate  a  Captain 
or  some  other  officer  to  act  during  his  absence.  This  is  not 
a  satisfactory  arrangement,  because  someone  in  an  executive 
position  should  be  in  the  general  headquarters  office  in  Jeffer* 
sou  City  during  the  absence  of  the  Superintendent  I»  there* 
fore,  recommend  that  an  executive  officer  with  a  rank  between 
that  of  Captain  and  the  Superintendent  be  created  and  that 
his  duties  be  designated  by  proper  legislation, 

Practically  all  departments  of  the  State  depend  upon  the 
Attorney  General's  office  for  legal  advice  and  their  successful 
operation  to  a  large  extent  depends  upon  the  kind  of  legal 
assistance  the  Attorney  GeneraTs  office  is  able  to  furnish* 
The  maximum  salaries  in  the  Attorney  General's  office  were 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  49 

fixed  approximately  twenty-five  years  ago.  During  the  past 
twenty  years  many  new  departments,  boards,  bureaus,  and 
agencies  have  been  created  by  the  General  Assembly  which 
has  correspondingly  increased  the  duties  of  the  Attorney  Gen- 
eral's office.  Also,  it  is  the  duty  of  the  Attorney  General's 
Office  to  construe  the  1945  Constitution  and  laws  enacted  to 
implement  that  document  and  to  advise  the  heads  of  the 
various  new  departments  in  regard  to  their  duties  under  the 
new  Constitution  and  laws.  I  recommend  that  the  salaries 
of  the  Assistant  Attorneys  General  and  employees  in  the 
Attorney  General's  office  be  increased  to  an  amount  com- 
mensurate with  the  duties  imposed  upon  them  in  order  that 
the  Attorney  General's  office  may  adequately  represent  the 
departments  of  the  State  government  and  perform  the  other 
duties  required  of  that  office. 

The  appropriation,  for  the  Attorney  General's  office  for 
operations  is  constantly  being  depleted  by  making  deposits 
for  court  costs  and  for  the  guarantee  of  the  payment  of  com- 
missioners' fees  and  other  expenses  involved  in  quo  warranto 
proceedings  and  other  lawsuits  filed  or  defended  by  the  Attor- 
ney General.  These  court  costs  must  be  deposited  until  a 
case  reaches  a  final  determination.  When  the  State  is  success- 
ful the  deposit  is  refunded  by  the  court,  but  under  the  exist- 
ing laws  it  is  returned  to  the  State  and  placed  in  the  General 
Revenue  Fund.  I  recommend  that  a  Revolving  Fund  be 
created  in  connection  with  the  Attorney  General's  office  so 
this  money,  when  returned,  will  remain  in  the  Attorney  Gen- 
eral's fund  for  the  purpose  of  paying  similar  costs  in  other 
lawsuits  which  he  may  find  it  necessary  to  institute. 

I  recommend  that  Section  22  of  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1945,  at  pages  730  to  731,  with  reference  to  membership  on 
the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools  be  repealed  and  reenacted 
and  that  the  following  words  be  stricken  out  of  said  Section  22: 

"Before  such  removal,  written  charges  shall  be  filed  with 
or  by  the  governor;  copies  of  these  shall  be  sent  to 
each  board  member,  including  the  one  against  whom  they 
are  made;  and  an  opportunity  to  be  heard  shall  be  given 
before  the  governor  and  in  the  presence  of  a  quorum  of 
the  board.  In  case  of  such  removal  the  governor  shall 


50  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

file  in  the  office  of  the  secretary  of  state  a  complete 
statement  of  all  charges  made  against  such  member  and 
his  findings  thereon." 

In  my  opinion  said  portion  of  said  Section  22  conflicts 
with  Section  17,  Article  4  of  the  1945  Constitution  which  pro- 
vides that  "All  appointive  officers  may  be  removed  by  the 
governor  .  .  ."  The  Governor  under  Section  2  of  Article  4 
of  the  Constitution  of  1945  is  charged  with  the  duty  of  faith- 
fully executing  the  laws.  This  is  the  Governor's  responsibility 
and  the  General  Assembly  has  no  authority  to  attempt  to 
restrict  the  Governor  in  that  regard. 

I  recommend  that  changes  be  made  in  the  following 
statutes  pertaining  to  crimes  and  punishments: 

That  Section  4323,  Article  3,  Chapter  31,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  line  10,  be  amended  by  inserting  after  the 
words  "public  officer"  and  before  the  word  "of"  the  words 
"or  employee"  so  that  said  section,  as  amended,  will  read: 

"Every  person  who  shall,  directly  or  indirectly,  give  any 
money,  goods,  right  in  action  or  any  other  valuable 
consideration,  gratuity  or  reward,  or  any  promise,  under- 
taking or  security  therefor,  to  any  judge  or  justice  of  any 
court,  justice  of  the  peace,  or  to  any  member  of  the  legis- 
lature, or  to  any  officer  or  employee  thereof,  or  to  any 
other  public  officer  or  employee  of  this  state,  .  .  .  „' 

Said  section  also  should  be  amended  to  strike  exit  the 
words  "justice  of  the  peace"  where  they  appear  in  said  section 
and  insert  in  lieu  thereof  the  word  "magistrate/* 

That  Section  4324,  Article  3,  Chapter  31,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  line  5,  be  amended  by  inserting  the 
words  "or  employee'*  after  the  word  "officer1*  and  before  the 
word  "of"  so  that  said  section,  as  amended,  will  read: 

"Every  judge  or  justice  of  any  court,  justice  of  the 
peace,  member  of  the  legislature,  or  officer  or  employee 
thereof  and  any  other  public  officer  or  Jg^^gygg,  °£  this 
state,  ,  ,  .  ." 

Said  section  also  should  be  amended  to  strike  out  the 
words  "justice  of  the  peace**  where  they  appear  in  said  seo 
turn  and  insert  in  lieu  thereof  the  word  "magistrate/* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  51 

Also,  that  Section  4478,  Article  5,  Chapter  31,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  line  1,  be  amended  by  inserting 
after  the  comma  ","  following  the  word  "officer"  the  words 
"agent  or  employee,"  so  that  said  section,  as  amended,  will 
read: 

"If  any  officer,  agent  or  employee,  appointed  or  elected 
by  virtue  of  the  Constitution  of  this  state,    .    .    .    ." 

I  recommend  that  the  penalty  provided  in  Section  4340, 
Article  3,  Chapter  31,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  in 
regard  to  fraud  in  office  be  changed  from  a  misdemeanor  to 
a  felony. 

I  recommend  that  Section  11421,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945, 
page  1873,  relating  to  the  sales  tax  act,  providing  that  books 
and  records  shall  be  preserved  for  a  period  of  at  least  two 
years  be  amended  and  that  the  words  "at  least  two  years" 
be  stricken  out  of  said  section  and  the  words  "five  years" 
inserted  in  lieu  thereof.  Because  of  an  inadequate  number  of 
competent  auditors  and  inadequate  appropriations  two  years 
is  an  insufficient  period  of  time  for  a  proper  audit  to  be  made 
of  the  books  and  records  of  those  engaged  in  the  retail  business. 

I  recommend  that  Sections  9036,  9039,  9071,  and  9096, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  be  repealed  for  the  reason 
that  said  sections  conflict  with  the  provisions  of  Section  15 
of  the  Merit  System  Act,  found  at  page  1165,  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1945,  in  regard  to  the  salaries  of  the  warden,  deputy 
warden,  chaplains,  superintendent  of  industries,  guards,  and 
other  employees  at  the  Missouri  State  Penitentiary. 

Our  present  statutes  in  regard  to  inmates  escaping  from 
the  Penal  Institutions  of  this  State  are  inadequate.  Sections 
4306,  4307,  and  4308,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
govern  the  escape  of  inmates  from  the  Penal  Institutions. 
I  called  this  to  the  attention  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly  on  January  8,  1947,  but  no  action  was  taken.  Since 
that  time  the  Supreme  Court  of  Missouri  has  rendered  an 
opinion  construing  Section  4307* 

However,  the  present  statutes  do  not  make  it  a  crime  to 
escape  from  the  Intermediate  Reformatory  for  Young  Men 
at  Algoa  and  the  Training  Schools.  I  recommend  that  legis- 
lation be  enacted  to  broaden  the  scope  of  the  present  statutes 


52  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

so  they  will  include  the  escape  of  inmates  from  the  State 
Penitentiary,  prison  farms,  Intermediate  Reformatory  for 
Young  Men  at  Algoa,  Training  School  for  Girls  at  Chillicothe, 
Training  School  for  Negro  Girls  at  Tipton,  and  Training  School 
for  Boys  at  Boonville,  either  while  confined  therein  or  while 
permitted  to  be  at  large  as  a  trusty. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Article  2,  Chapter  68,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  private  employment 
offices  or  agencies  for  hire  where  a  fee  is  charged  to  applicants 
for  employment,  should  be  amended  to  regulate  the  fees 
charged  applicants  and  to  prohibit  the  charging  of  unreason- 
able fees.  Questionable  practices  by  private  employment 
agencies  in  the  charging  of  exorbitant  fees  exist  in  this  State. 
These  practices  should  be  corrected. 

Also,  the  Division  of  Industrial  Inspection  should  be 
authorized  to  enact  rules  and  regulations  governing  the  prac- 
tices of  private  employment  agencies,  These  rules  and  regu- 
lations should  be  made  a  matter  of  public  record  as  is  provided 
for  by  law. 

Under  the  present  law  if  an  application  for  a  license  to 
operate  a  private  employment  agency  is  made,  accompanied 
by  a  bond,  the  State  Division  of  Industrial  Inspection  has  no 
alternative  except  to  issue  the  license.  There  should  be  some 
authority  vested  in  the  Division  of  Industrial  Inspection  regu- 
lating the  issuance  of  such  licenses. 

Section  34,  Article  3  of  the  1945  Constitution  provides 
"In  the  year  1949  and  at  least  every  ten  years  thereafter,  all 
general  statute  laws  shall  be  revised,  digested  and  promul- 
gated as  provided  by  law/'  Therefore,  the  general  statutory 
laws  should  be  revised  by  the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly* 

I  have  had  the  honor  of  serving  as  Chairman  of  two 
Revision  Commissions,  in  1929  and  1939*  By  reason  of  this 
experience  I  want  to  caution  the  members  of  the  General 
Assembly  that  those  in  charge  of  the  Revision  should  take 
every  precaution  to  see  that  the  substantive  law  in  the  stat- 
utes is  not  changed*  Too  often  persons  or  groups  interested 
in  a  certain  section  or  subject  in  the  statutes  appear  before 
the  Revision  Commission  seeking  to  clarify  or  change  the 
wording  of  a  section  without  regard  to  related  sections  and  in 
many  instances  they  have  ulterior  motives  in  doing  so.  Many 
of  the  statutes  have  been  interpreted  by  our  courts  and  have 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  53 

a  definite  construction.  The  Revision  Commission  or  those 
in  charge  of  the  Revision  should  not  be  permitted  to  alter  the 
substantive  law.  Changes  should  be  made  only  by  proper 
legislation  enacted  by  this  General  Assembly.  Unless  this 
policy  is  followed  we  may  awaken  to  the  fact  that  a  legis- 
lative staff  charged  only  with  the  revision  of  the  laws  has 
exceeded  its  authority  and  invaded  the  province  of  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  in  altering  the  substance  of  the  law. 

I  recommend  that  the  salaries  of  employees  and  heads 
of  divisions  within  the  different  departments  of  State  govern- 
ment be  made  as  nearly  uniform  as  possible  so  those  doing 
comparable  work  be  paid  on  the  same  basis.  I  undertook  to 
do  this,  but  was  unable  to  do  so  because  of  the  variation  in 
stipulated  salaries  in  the  statutes  and  the  different  classifica- 
tions of  persons  doing  the  same  work  in  the  various  divisions. 
For  instance,  a  chief  clerk  in  one  department  receives  a  salary 
of  $2,800.00  per  year  fixed  by  statute,  while  in  another  depart- 
ment or  division  a  chief  clerk  may  receive  as  high  as  $5,600.00 
because  there  is  no  statutory  limitation. 

Employees  in  divisions  covered  by  the  State  merit  system 
conform  to  a  uniform  classification  schedule  and  a  definite 
pay  schedule  with  permanent  employment.  I  suggest  that  the 
statutory  salaries  of  division  heads  and  other  employees  not 
under  the  merit  system  be  removed;  that  said  division  heads 
and  employees  be  made  subject  to  a  uniform  classification 
and  salary  schedule  similar  to  the  merit  system  with  the  pay 
scale  probably  somewhat  higher  to  make  up  for  the  limited 
period  of  employment  and  the  uncertainty  of  tenure. 

Section  7,  Article  8,  Constitution  of  1945,  provides  "Quali- 
fied electors  of  the  state  who  are  absent,  whether  within  or 
without  the  state,  may  be  enabled  by  general  law  to  vote  at 
all  elections  by  the  people."  I  recommend  that  legislation 
be  enacted  in  regard  to  absentee  voting  in  order  that  qualified 
electors  of  this  State  who  are  absent  from  the  State  of  Mis- 
souri on  election  day  may  be  enabled  to  vote. 

The  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  was 
created  by  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  found 
in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  945.  Section  28  of  said  act 
provides  that  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Mental  Diseases 
shall  be  a  person  recognized  for  his  knowledge  of  mental 
diseases,  and  the  care  and  treatment  thereof,  and  also  known 


54  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

for  his  business  and  executive  ability.  This  provision  makes 
it  practically  mandatory  that  the  Governor  appoint  a  psy- 
chiatrist to  this  office. 

It  has  been  proven  by  experience  over  the  past  two  years 
that  the  duties  of  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Mental 
Diseases  are  in  the  main  business  duties  and  not  duties  such 
as  require  the  services  of  a  psychiatrist  or  even  an  ordinary 
physician.  Superintendents  have  charge  of  the  hospitals 
under  the  Director  of  the  Division.  Each  superintendent  is 
a  physician  and  some  are  psychiatrists.  They  have  direct 
supervision  over  the  care  of  the  patients.  The  duties  of  the 
Director,  however,  are  largely  supervisory,  having  to  do  with 
appropriations,  control  of  expenses,  approval  of  purchases, 
maintenance  of  the  properties,  the  planning  for  additional 
facilities,  the  growing  of  crops  and  the  production  of  livestock, 

It  is  generally  known  that  there  is  a  dire  shortage  of 
doctors,  especially  physicians  who  have  had  the  special  train- 
ing to  qualify  them  as  psychiatrists. 

It  is  my  recommendation  that  because  of  the  shortage  of 
psychiatrists  together  with  the  fact  that  the  duties  of  the 
Director  are  principally  concerned  with  the  business  manage- 
ment of  the  State  Hospitals,  that  Section  28,  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1945,  page  953,  be  amended  so  it  will  be  possible  to 
appoint  a  person  to  this  office  who  is  known  for  his  business 
and  executive  ability  without  his  having  to  be  a  psychiatrist. 

Section  7  of  the  act  pertaining  to  the  Director  of  Public 
Health  and  Welfare  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page 
945,  provides  among  other  things  that  all  employees  of  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  shall  be  citizens  of 
this  State  for  at  least  two  years  next  before  taking  the 
examination* 

The  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  is  one  of 
the  largest  of  the  new  State  departments  and  because  of  the 
nature  of  the  services  performed  by  the  three  divisions  in  that 
department  they  necessarily  employ  a  great  many  professional 
and  technical  employees,  such  as  doctors,  nurses,  laboratory 
technicians,  sanitation  engineers,  statisticians,  referees,  and 
other  such  employees.  The  Director  of  the  Department  and 
the  Directors  of  the  Divisions  within  the  Department  have 
tried  to  follow  literally  the  provisions  of  the  present  law  with 
reference  to  the  hiring  of  personnel.  This  is  practically  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  55 

only  department  of  the  State  government  that  has  such  a 
strict  limitation  in  the  selection  of  personnel. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  it  has  been  difficult  to  keep  our 
State  Hospitals  fully  staffed  during  the  past  two  years,  it  is 
my  recommendation  that  the  provisions  in  Section  7,  requir- 
ing two  years  of  citizenship,  be  repealed. 

I  call  your  attention  to  Public  Law  725,  known  as  the 
Hill-Burton  Act,  enacted  by  Congress  in  order  to  provide 
hospital  facilities  to  those  areas  where  the  need  was  greatest, 
under  a  plan  which  was  to  be  developed  by  the  states. 

The  General  Assembly  of  Missouri  recognized  this  Fed- 
eral statute  by  enacting  an  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1945,  at  page  972.  The  survey  provided  for  in  said  State 
act  has  been  completed  and  the  plan  approved  by  the  Surgeon 
General  of  the  United  States.  This  plan  designates  the  areas 
throughout  the  State  most  in  need  of  hospital  beds  for  which 
the  Federal  government  will  contribute  one-third  of  the  cost 
of  construction  and  equipment.  However,  due  to  high  build- 
ing costs  the  areas  most  in  need  of  hospital  facilities  are  un- 
able to  provide  sufficient  funds  to  meet  their  two-thirds  of 
the  cost* 

Unless  provisions  are  made  to  assist  the  individual  coun- 
ties or  groups  of  counties  in  the  State  for  a  part  of  the  cost 
of  hospital  construction  in  those  areas  of  low  economic  in- 
come, as  designated  by  the  State  plan,  the  intention  of  the 
Hill-Burton  Act  will  be  defeated. 

I  therefore  recommend  that  serious  consideration  be  given 
to  this  problem. 

The  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  found  in 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1395,  provides  a  method  whereby 
contiguous  counties  may  join  in  the  execution  of  a  common 
function,  or  service,  including  the  purchase,  construction,  and 
maintaining  of  hospitals,  etc.  Said  act  provides  that  the 
county  courts  shall  administer  the  delegated  power  and  allo- 
cate the  cost  among  the  counties. 

The  establishing  aad  maintaining  of  County  Hospitals 
is  provided  for  in  Article  4,  Chapter  126,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939. 

These  acts  of  the  General  Assembly  apparently  are  in 
conflict  with  each  other  for  the  reason  that  under  the  act  of 
the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 


56  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

1945,  page  1395,  the  hospitals  are  governed  by  the  county 
courts  and  under  Article  4,  Chapter  126,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  they  are  governed  by  a  board  of  trustees 
and  these  two  acts  should  be  reconciled,  in  order  that  one 
agency  should  govern  said  hospitals. 

The  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1945,  page  969,  provides  for  establishing,  maintain- 
ing, managing,  and  operating  a  public  county  health  center 
in  any  county  or  group  of  counties.  However,  said  act  does 
not  provide  for  the  operation  and  maintenance  of  a  health 
center  in  a  group  of  counties  after  such  group  has  been  formed. 

I  recommend  this  act  be  amended  in  order  to  provide  a 
practical  working  procedure. 

The  General  Hospital  at  Waynesville,  Missouri,  has  been 
operated  by  the  Division  of  Health  in  agreement  with  the 
Federal  Works  Agency*  Under  the  Lanham  Act  of  Congress 
all  such  Federally  owned  institutions  must  be  liquidated. 
This  institution  is  serving  the  citizens  in  approximately  five 
counties  in  that  immediate  area.  There  is  no  specific  statute 
authorizing  the  State  to  operate  said  hospital.  This  hospital 
ha,s  been  self  sustaining,  deriving  the  cost  of  operation  and  of 
personal  service  from  individual  patients, 

It  is  suggested  that  authority  be  given  to  the  Division  of 
Health  to  operate  said  hospital  and  that  provision  be  made 
for  the  handling  of  the  funds  derived  therefrom. 

Congress  enacted  Public  Law  845  for  the  control  of 
stream  pollution.  It  is  the  intention  of  said  Federal  law  that 
the  responsibility  for  the  abatement  of  stream  pollution  rests 
with  the  states. 

I  recommend  tjhat  legislation  be  enacted  authorizing  the 
Division  of  Health  to  institute  programs  as  provided  for  in 
said  Public  Law  845  and  that  such  legislation  permit  munici- 
palities to  issue  revenue  bonds  for  this  purpose  and  to  retire 
said  bonds  by  sewage  rentals* 

The  statutory  law  in  regard  to  the  operation  and  super- 
vision of  the  Cancer  Hospital  at  Columbia  should  be  clarified* 

The  Cancer  Hospital  was  established  by  the  Cancer  Com- 
mission under  the  authority  contained  in  Chapter  125,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939*  After  the  adoption  of  the  1945 
Constitution  the  Cancer  Commission  was  assigned  to  the 
Division  of  Health  in  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  57 

Welfare.  This  was  done  under  executive  order  of  the  Governor 
and  also  by  an  act  of  the  General  Assembly  found  in  Section 
13,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  949,  The  law  creating  and 
establishing  a  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  (Laws 
of  Missouri,  1945,  page  945)  provides  (Section  2),  "The 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  shall  be  controlled 
and  administered  by  a  Director  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare." 
This  act  (Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  945)  also  provides 
that  the  Department  shall  be  composed  of  three  divisions, 
namely,  the  Division  of  Health,  the  Division  of  Mental  Dis- 
eases, and  the  Division  of  Welfare. 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  Cancer  Commission  was  not 
abolished  but  was  assigned  to  the  Division  of  Health.  There- 
fore, the  question  arises  as  to  the  extent  of  the  authority  of 
the  Cancer  Commission  as  distinct  from  the  authority  of  the 
Division  of  Health  and  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 
Welfare. 

I  recommend  that  these  statutes  be  clarified  in  order  that 
the  final  administrative  authority  of  the  State  Cancer  Hospital 
be  placed  definitely  in  one  department  of  the  State  government. 

In  1919  the  General  Assembly  provided  for  the  erection 
of  a  monument  in  France  to  commemorate  the  heroic  achieve- 
ments of  the  citizens  of  Missouri  who  served  on  the  battle- 
fields of  France  and  to  perpetuate  the  memory  of  those  who 
died  in,  the  war  against  Germany  and  her  allies.  An  appro- 
priation of  Twenty-five  Thousand  Dollars  was  made  for  this 
purpose  (Laws  of  Missouri,  1919,  page  77).  A  small  appro- 
priation for  care  of  the  grounds  and  monument  was  made 
each  two  years  thereafter  until  1939,  No  appropriation  has 
been  made  since  that  date,  due,  no  doubt,  to  the  war.  I  called 
this  matter  to  the  attention  of  the  Appropriations  Committee 
of  the  Senate  in  1947  but  no  action  was  taken.  I  recommended 
that  an  appropriation  of  not  exceeding  Five  Hundred  Dollars 
be  enacted  for  the  purpose  of  maintaining  the  grounds  and 
monument  in  France  and  that  a  small  appropriation  for  this 
purpose  be  made  each  year  thereafter. 

The  appropriations  enacted  by  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly  for  some  of  the  departments  of  the  State  government 
for  the  current  fiscal  year  were  inadequate,  and  I  recommend 
that  this  General  Assembly  enact  additional  appropriations 
for  the  following  departments; 


58  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  the  Department  of  Revenue  additional  duties  were 
added  by  reason  of  enactment  of  the  following  laws: 

An  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  2,  page 
431,  providing  for  the  collection  of  sales  tax  and  use  tax  on 
motor  vehicles  at  the  time  of  registration.  It  is  estimated 
this  act  adds  thirty  per  cent  to  the  volume  of  business  handled 
by  the  Revenue  Department. 

An  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1191, 
requiring  the  registration  and  issuing  of  a  certificate  of  title 
to  outboard  motors,  the  handling  of  applications  for  regis- 
tration, and  the  collection  of  registration  fees. 

An  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1207, 
known  as  the  Financial  Responsibility  Law,  providing  for  the 
giving  of  proof  of  financial  responsibility  of  persons  operating 
motor  vehicles,  and  providing  for  the  enforcement  of  the 
provisions  of  said  act. 

No  appropriation  was  provided  by  the  Sixty-fourth  Gen- 
eral Assembly  for  the  enforcement  of  the  above  laws. 

The  peak  period  on  income  tax  collection  is  approaching 
which  will  add  greatly  to  the  volume  of  work  in  this  office. 

The  staff  of  auditors  is  inadequate  to  properly  cover  the 
State  in  the  collection  of  the  sales  tax. 

I  recommend  that  an  additional  appropriation  of  seventy- 
five  thousand  dollars  for  personal  service  be  enacted  for  the 
Department  of  Revenue, 

The  Division  of  Public  Buildings  requests  an  additional 
appropriation  for  Personal  Service  of  Six  Thousand  Dollars 
to  employ  additional  elevator  operators  and  janitors  during 
the  session  of  the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly;  also,  an 
additional  appropriation  of  approximately  Ten  Thousand  Five 
Hundred  Dollars  for  Operation  to  buy  fuel  oil  for  the  current 
fiscal  year. 

The  Director  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 
Welfare  requests  an  additional  appropriation  for  Personal 
Service  in  the  amount  of  Two  Thousand  Dollars;  and  Two 
Hundred  and  Fifty  Dollars  for  Operation. 

The  appropriation  for  the  office  of  the  Attorney  General 
has  been  reduced  each  year  during  the  past  two  years  below 
the  appropriation  for  1945-46  although  additional  duties  have 
been  added  to  this  office*  I  recommend  an  additional  appro- 
priation for  Personal  Service  of  Thirty-two  Thousand  Dollars; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  59 

and  Six  Thousand  Four  Hundred  and  Twenty  Dollars  for 
Additions,  Repairs,  Replacements,  and  Operation  for  the 
present  fiscal  year. 

The  Director  of  the  Department  of  Corrections  informed 
the  Appropriation  Committees  of  the  General  Assembly  that 
due  to  the  salary  ranges  set  under  the  Merit  System  Act,  an 
additional  appropriation  for  Personal  Service  of  Seventy-eight 
Thousand  Dollars  would  be  required  to  pay  the  salaries  at 
the  State  Penitentiary  for  the  year  1948-49.  This  statement 
in  regard  to  the  need  for  an  additional  appropriation  is  still 
true. 

Since  that  time  a  new  power  plant  was  authorized  at  the 
Penitentiary  and  is  now  under  construction  and  probably  will 
be  in  operation  early  in  1949.  At  least  four  additional  em- 
ployees will  be  needed  for  this  unit  which  will  require  approxi- 
mately Two  Thousand  Dollars  for  the  current  fiscal  year. 
I,  therefore,  recommend  an  additional  appropriation  of  Eighty 
Thousand  Dollars  for  Personal  Service  for  the  State  Peni- 
tentiary. 

The  Operation  funds  at  the  State  Penitentiary  have  been 
inadequate  and  I  recommend  an  additional  appropriation  of 
approximately  Fifty  Thousand  Dollars  for  this  purpose  for 
the  present  current  year. 

I  recommend  an  additional  appropriation  of  Two  Thou- 
sand Dollars  for  Repairs  and  Replacements  for  the  Training 
School  for  Negro  Girls,  Tipton. 

By  reason  of  putting  into  effect  the  Merit  System  and 
Eight  Hour  Law  at  the  Missouri  State  Sanatorium,  Mt.  Ver- 
non,  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  failed  to  appropriate 
sufficient  funds  for  personal  service  at  this  institution.  It  is 
estimated  that  an  additional  appropriation  of  One  Hundred 
Thousand  Dollars  will  be  required  for  personal  service  for  the 
remainder  of  the  present  fiscal  year. 

The  St.  Louis  State  Hospital  and  the  St.  Louis  Training 
School  were  transferred  to  the  State  under  an  act  passed  by 
the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly.  However,  no  definite 
information  was  furnished  the  General  Assembly  as  to  the 
necessary  amount  of  appropriation  required  for  said  institu- 
tions for  the  current  fiscal  year.  Large  requests  for  personal 
service  and  for  operation  at  the  St.  Louis  State  Hospital  have 
been  made,  and  although  I  recommend  additional  appropria* 


<30  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

tions  for  the  current  fiscal  year  I  suggest  this  matter  be  given 
careful  study  and  consideration  by  this  General  Assembly. 
This  is  also  true  as  to  the  request  of  the  St.  Louis  Training 
School  for  Personal  Service. 

For  several  years  the  Section  of  Vital  Statistics  in  the 
Division  of  Health  has  been  unable  to  carry  out  the  procedure 
required  under  the  statutes  because  of  insufficient  funds.  The 
Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  enacted  a  law  found  in  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  2,  page  237,  requiring  registration 
of  marriages,  divorces,  and  adoptions,  but  no  additional 
appropriation  was  enacted  to  carry  out  the  provisions  of  this 
act.  I,  therefore,  recommend  that  an  additional  appropria- 
tion be  made  for  this  fiscal  year  to  meet  the  requirements  of 
the  Vital  Statistics  Section  of  the  Division  of  Health* 

At  the  Trachoma  Hospital,  Rolla,  the  operating  and  per- 
sonal expenses  have  increased  beyond  expectations  since  the 
last  appropriation  was  made.  In  order  to  maintain  the  pres- 
ent standards  an,  additional  appropriation  in  Personal  Service 
and  in  Operation  should  be  made. 

At  the  Federal  Soldiers'  Home,  St.  James,  an  additional 
appropriation,  due  to  increased  cost  of  operation,  will  be 
required  for  the  current  fiscal  year.  Also,  an  additional 
appropriation  of  approximately  Three  Thousand  Dollars  will 
be  required  for  a  new  boiler  at  said  institution. 

Expenditures  for  old  age  assistance  for  the  current  fiscal 
year  are  running  very  close,  and  there  is  likelihood  that  the 
appropriation  will  not  be  sufficient  to  meet  full  needs  through- 
out this  fiscal  year,  I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly 
appropriate  additional  funds  for  old  age  assistance  sufficient 
in  amount  to  insure  that  full  needs  under  this  program  for 
this  fiscal  year  will  be  met. 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  appropriated  $4»650>- 
000*00  from  the  General  Revenue  Fund  for  Aid  to  Dependent 
Children  for  the  current  fiscal  year,  This  appropriation  will 
not  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  full  needs  of  children  eligible  for 
assistance  under  this  program, 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  appropriated  $5»000r 
000  for  General  Relief  payments  for  the  current  fiscal  year. 
This  amount  permits  the  payment  of  only  fifty-five  per  cent 
of  an  individual's  need  who  qualifies  for  aid  under  this  program* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M,  DONNELLY  61 

I  recommend  that  the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly 
appropriate  sufficient  additional  money  to  enable  the  Division 
of  Welfare  to  make  full  payments  to  dependent  children  within 
the  limits  of  the  maximum  grants  established  by  Federal  aid 
State  statutes,  and  appropriate  additional  funds  to  make 
grants  to  unemployable  persons  on  relief  rolls  on  a  basis  of 
decency  and  health,  as  provided  by  State  law. 

For  the  past  four  fiscal  years,  the  Division  of  Welfare 
has  received  exactly  the  same  appropriation  from  the  State 
General  Revenue  Fund  for  administration  of  the  welfare  pro- 
gram in  this  State.  Obviously  the  program  cannot  be  admin- 
istered now  on  the  same  appropriations  as  in  the  past.  The 
appropriation  this  year  is  rxot  adequate  to  maintain  a  sufficient 
staff  to  meet  the  needs  of  persons  under  this  program  promptly 
and  to  make  necessary  recurrent  checks  of  eligibility  of  those 
persons  on  the  assistance  rolls.  I  recommend  that  this  Gen- 
eral Assembly  appropriate  additional  administrative  funds  to 
the  Division  of  Welfare  in  such  an,  amount  as  to  insure 
adequate  administration  of  the  welfare  programs. 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  passed  legislation 
increasing  the  monthly  blind  pension  from  thirty  dollars  per 
month  to  thirty-five  dollars  per  month  but  did  not  appropriate 
additional  funds  to  meet  this  increase  for  the  entire  fiscal 
year.  Furthermore,  the  law  setting  the  blind  pension  pay- 
ment at  thirty-five  dollars  per  month  expires  June  30, 
1949,  I  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  appropriate 
additional  funds  to  pay  blind  pensions  at  thirty-five  dollars 
per  month  and  extend  such  payment  for  as  long  a  period  as 
the  General  Assembly  deems  necessary  after  June  30,  1949. 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  enacted  an  appro- 
priation of  $3,600.00  to  provide  readers  for  blind  students  who 
wish  to  attend  a  university  as  provided  by  law.  This  appro- 
priation is  insufficient  for  this  fiscal  year  and  should  be 
increased* 

I  am  advised  by  the  Comptroller  that  an  additional 
appropriate  of  approximately  One  Hundred  Twenty-five 
Thousand  Dollars  will  be  required  for  costs  in  criminal  cases 
for  the  present  fiscal  year. 

I  am  advised  by  the  Motor  Vehicle  Fuel  Tax  Unit  that 
an  additional  appropriation  of  approximately  Two  Hundred 


62  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Fifteen  Thousand  Dollars  will  be  required  to  pay  gasoline 
tax  refunds  for  the  current  fiscal  year. 

The  power  plant  for  the  Capitol  Building  and  other  State 
buildings  should  be  improved.  I  am  advised  that  it  will  cost 
approximately  $267,000.00,  for  necessary  parts  and  repairs 
including  one  1250  kilowatt  generator  and  engijne,  tunnel, 
cables  and  piping  in  the  Power  House  from  switchboard  to 
generators,  steam  and  exhaust  piping,  new  switchboard  and 
cables,  coal  handling  equipment,  traveling  overhead  crane, 
new  smoke  stack,  re-wiring  for  the  Capitol  Building,  and  other 
miscellaneous  items. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  I  made  a  number  of  recommenda- 
tions in  messages  to  the  Sixty-third  and  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assemblies  on  which  no  action  was  taken,  I  respectfully  call 
your  attention  to  those  messages  for  such  action  as  you  may 
deem  advisable. 

It  would  not  be  proper  for  me  to  anticipate  the  policies 
or  the  program  of  the  incoming  Governor,  who  will  have  his 
own  recommendations  to  submit  for  your  consideration. 

In  conclusion,  I  wish  to  express  my  appreciation  for  the 
cooperation  which  has  been  extended  to  me  by  the  elective 
officials,  the  various  departments  and  institutions  of  the  State 
government,  and  by  members  of  the  General  Assembly,  The 
past  four  years  has  been  a  transition  period.  During  this 
momentous  time  great  changes  have  taken  place  in  nation 
and  state.  War  has  been  followed  by  an  uneasy  peace. 
Throughout  this  changing  period  our  State  has  progressed 
and  has  met  the  challenges  of  the  times*  May  we  still  go 
forward,  meeting  the  needs  and  demands  of  new  days  with 
courage  and  determination.  And  may  Missouri  continue  to 
lead  the  nation,  with  peace  and  prosperity  our  constant  goal, 
remembering  always  that  the  '* welfare  of  the  people  is  and 
should  be  the  supreme  law  for  both  State  and  Nation*** 

[PHIL  M,  DONNELLY*] 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  63 


VETO  MESSAGES 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY  10,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  922-928 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  10,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  110,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Article  2,  Chapter  32,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  known  as  the  Non-intoxicating  Beer 
Act  by  adding  a  new  section  relating  to  the  inspection 
of  the  premises  of  permit  or  license  holders  to  be  known 
as  Section  4951a;  amending  Section  4954  to  provide  that 
fees  are  to  be  paid  to  the  Director  of  Revenue  if  provided 
by  law  and  by  adding  a  new  sub  section  relating  to  fees 
to  be  known  as  sub  section  (e);  amending  Section  4959 
by  striking  the  words  'Attorney  General'  wherever  it  may 
appear  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  words  'Supervisor 
of  Liquor  Control';  by  repealing  Section  4960  and  re- 
enacting  a  new  section  to  be  known  as  Section  4960  relat- 
ing to  application  for  license  to  manufacture  or  sell  non- 
intoxicating  beer;  by  repealing  Section  4996  and  enacting 
in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section  to  be  known  as  Section  4996 
relating  to  the  revocation  and  suspension  of  license  and 
provide  hearings;  and  by  adding  a  new  section  which 
shall  be  known  as  Section  4996b  relating  to  the  suspension 
and  revocation  of  license  and  giving  authority  to  the 
supervisor  of  liquor  control  to  make  regulations." 


64  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Said  bill  was  presented  to  me  on  May  1,  1945.  Said  bill 
is  accompanied  with  my  objections  set  out  below. 

In  the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  110  it  is  stated  that  Section 
4996  (Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939)  is  repealed  and  a 
new  section  enacted  in  lieu  thereof  to  be  known  as  Section 
4996  relating  to  the  revocation  and  suspension  of  license  and 
providing  hearings, 

In  Section  1  of  House  Bill  No.  110  it  is  stated  "by  repeal- 
ing Section  4996  and  enacting  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section 
to  be  known  as  Section  4996,  relating  to  the  revocation  and 
suspension  of  license  and  provide  hearing." 

Section  4996  does  not  appear  in  the  bill  as  recnacted;  in 
fact,  it  is  entirely  omitted  from  the  bill.  It  is  my  opinion 
that  the  language  in  the  title  and  also  in  Section  1  of  the  bill 
is  sufficient  to  repeal  Section  4996  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  even  though  this  section  is  not  reenacted  in 
the  bill. 

Said  Section  4996  is  the  section  of  the  Non-intoxicating 
Beer  Act  which  authorizes  the  Supervisor  of  Liquor  Control 
to  revoke  the  license  of  a  dealer  when  the  dealer  has  violated 
any  of  the  provisions  of  the  Non-intoxicating  Beer  Act,  but 
the  dealer  must  have  ten  days'  notice  of  the  application  to 
revoke  his  license  prior  to  the  order  of  revocation,  with  full 
right  to  have  counsel,  to  produce  witnesses  in  his  behalf  in 
such  hearing  and  to  be  advised  in  writing  of  the  grounds 
upon  which  his  license  is  sought  to  be  revoked. 

This  is  an  important  section  and  in  my  opinion  should 
not  be  repealed.  There  is  a  similar  section  in  the  Liquor 
Control  Act,  it  being  Section  4905.  I  think  the  dealer  should 
have  notice,  also  the  right  to  have  counsel  arid  to  produce 
witnesses  in  his  behalf  and  to  be  advised  in,  writing  the  grounds 
upon  which  his  license  is  sought  to  be  revoked.  This  is  a 
right  which  should  not  be  denied  to  him* 

The  provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  110  are  meritorious  and 
I  believe  will  better  aid  in  the  enforcement  of  the  Non4nt03d» 
eating  Beer  Act  but  I  do  not  feel  justified  in  signing  this  bill 
in  its  present  form*  No  doubt  the  authors  intended  to  reenact 
Section  4996  and  include  suspension  of  license  as  well  as  revo- 
cation but,  of  course,  failed  to  do  so  by  omitting  the  section 
entirely  from  the  bill* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  65 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  bill  should  be  reintroduced  and 
Section  4996  repealed  and  reenacted,  providing  for  both  revo- 
cation and  suspension  of  license. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  31,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  861-869 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  31,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No. 
60,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Providing  for  the  reimbursement  to  members  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  for  expenses  incurred  away 
from  their  homes  in  the  performance  of  their  duties  in 
the  sum  of  $5.00  per  day;  providing  for  a  form  of  claim 
for  reimbursement;  providing  for  the  form  of  reimburse- 
ment to  be  certified  by  such  members  to  the  Committee 
on  Accounts  of  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives; 
providing  for  examination  and  approval  of  said  claims; 
providing  that  the  provisions  of  Sections  13027  and  13028 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  shall  not  apply  to 
members  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly;  providing  that 
all  acts  or  parts  of  acts  insofar  as  they  are  in  conflict  with 
the  provisions  of  this  act  are  repealed;  with  an  emergency 
clause/* 


66  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I  have  vetoed  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  60  for  the  following  reasons: 

Section  1  of  said  bill  provides: 

"From  and  after  the  effective  date  of  this  act  the 
members  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  shall  severally 
be  reimbursed  for  all  expenses  of  lodging  and  meals  actually 
and  necessarily  incurred  away  from  their  homes  in  con- 
nection with  their  legislative  duties  at  the  rate  of  $5.00 
per  day,  payable  monthly." 

Section  2  provides: 

"All  claims  for  such  reimbursement  shall  state  the  date 
and  place  of  such  legislative  duties,  and  shall  be  sub- 
mitted to  the  Committee  on  Accounts  of  the  Senate  and 
House  of  Representatives  respectively  upon  a  form  pre- 
pared by  such  committees,  such  claims  shall  be  supported 
by  the  certification  of  such  member,  and  shall  be  in  the 
following  form: 

*I „ do  certify  that  the  above  claim 

is  correct  and  just,  that  the  expense  was  incurred  away 
from  my  home  while  actually  and  necessarily  engaged  in 
my  legislative  duties,  that  payment  was  made  out  of 
my  personal  funds  and  I  have  not  been  reimbursed  there- 
for, and  I  have  not  received  and  will  not  receive  from 
any  source  whatever  any  payment  of  any  part  thereof 
except  as  provided  by  law/  " 

Section  3  is  as  follows: 

c<The  Committee  on  Accounts  of  the  Senate  and 
House  of  Representatives  shall  examine  said  claims  and 
if  found  to  be  correct  shall  approve  them  for  payment* 
The  State  Auditor  shall  not  audit  and  the  State  Treasurer 
shall  not  pay  any  such  claim  for  reimbursement  in  excess 
of  |5*00  for  any  calendar  day.  The  provisions  of  Sec- 
tions 13027  and  13028,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  shall  not  apply  to  members  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly*  All  laws  or  parts  of  laws  insofar  as  they  are 
in  conflict  with  the  provisions  of  this  act  are  repealed/* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  67 

Section  4  contains  an  emergency  clause. 

While  Section  2  of  said  bill  provides  that  the  members  of 
the  Legislature  shall  certify  that  their  claims  for  reimburse- 
ment are  correct  and  just,  and  that  payment  was  made  out 
of  their  personal  funds  and  that  they  have  not  been  reimbursed 
therefor,  it  is  apparent  that  Section  1  allows  each  member 
the  flat  sum  of  $5.00  per  day,  payable  monthly,  for  reimburse- 
ment for  lodging  and  meals  incurred  away  from  his  home  in 
connection  with  his  legislative  duties. 

In  passing  upon  the  constitutionality  of  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  60,  several  provisions  of  the 
Constitution  should  be  taken  into  consideration. 

Section  16  of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  provides: 

"Senators  and  representatives  shall  receive  from  the 
state  treasury  as  salary  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and 
twenty-five  dollars  per  month,  and  upon  certification  by 
the  president  and  secretary  of  the  senate  and  by  the 
speaker  and  chief  clerk  of  the  house  of  representatives  as 
to  the  respective  members  thereof,  the  state  auditor 
shall  audit  and  the  state  treasurer  shall  pay  such  com- 
pensation without  legislative  enactment.  Senators  and 
representatives  shall  receive  one  dollar  for  every  ten  miles 
traveled  in  going  to  and  returning  from  their  place  of 
meeting,  once  in  each  session,  on  the  most  usual  route.'* 

Section  13  of  Article  VII  of  said  Constitution  reads: 

"The  compensation  of  state,  county  and  municipal 
officers  shall  not  be  increased  during  the  term  of  office; 
nor  shall  the  term  of  any  officer  be  extended." 

Section  40  of  Article  III  of  said  Constitution  provides 
that  the  General  Assembly  shall  not  pass  any  local  or  special 
law: 

"(30)  where  a  general  law  can  be  made  applicable, 
and  whether  a  general  law  could  have  been  made  appli- 
cable is  a  judicial  question  to  be  judicially  determined 
without  regard  to  any  legislative  assertion  on  that 
subject," 


68  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  approaching  a  construction  of  the  Constitution,  cer- 
tain fundamental  rules  of  construction  should  be  recognized. 
(1)  The  Constitution  is  a  limitation  of  power,  and  the  Legis- 
lature is  supreme,  except  as  its  power  is  limited  by  the  Con- 
stitution. (2)  In  construing  the  Constitution,  words  are  to 
be  given  their  ordinary  meaning,  (3)  All  doubts  or  ambiguities 
are  to  be  resolved  in  favor  of  the  constitutionality  of  an  act 
of  the  Legislature.  (4)  The  doctrine  of  expressio  unius  est 
exdusio  alterius  is  applicable  in  construing  the  Constitution. 

Section  16  of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  plainly  pro- 
vides that  senators  and  representatives  shall  receive  $125  per 
month,  and  shall  receive  $1.00  for  each  ten  miles  traveled  in 
going  to  and  returning  from  their  place  of  meeting,  once  in 
each  session,  on  the  most  usual  route.  Clearly,  the  $125  per 
month  is  compensation.  Whether  or  not  the  amount  allowed 
for  mileage  is  compensation  or  reimbursement  for  personal 
expenses  is  a  question  about  which  the  courts  of  various  states 
have  differed. 

If  the  $5,00  per  day  allowed  by  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  60  is  construed  to  be  compensation, 
I  think  there  is  no  question  that  said  bill  would  be  in,  violation 
of  Section  16  of  Article  III,  supra,  which  fixes  the  compensa- 
tion of  members  of  the  General  Assembly;  and  of  Section  13 
of  Article  VII?  supra,  which  prohibits  an  increase  in  eompensa-* 
tion  of  any  State  officer  during  his  term  of  office.  If  the  $5.00 
provided  by  said  bill  is  construed  to  be  reimbursement  for 
expenses  and  the  mileage  allowed  senators  ami  representatives 
by  Section  16  of  Article  III  is  likewise  construed  to  be  reim- 
bursement for  expenses,  said  bill  might  be  held  to  he  in  con- 
flict with  said  Section  16  under  the  doctrine  of  cxpressh 
unius  est  exdnsio  alterius. 

The  further  question  arises  as  to  whether  or  not  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  60,  which  provides 
|5.00  per  day  for  members  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  only, 
is  a  special  law  prohibited  by  Section  40  of  Article  III  of  the 
Constitution  cited  above*  The  questions  which  naturally  pre- 
sent themselves  are  related  and  will  be  discussed  together* 

I  recognize  the  fact  that  there  is  a  distinction  between 
compensation  and  reimbursement  for  expenses.  I  appreciate 
the  fact  that  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  69 

No.  60  labels  the  $5.00  per  day  as  reimbursement  for  expenses 
for  lodging  and  meals,  but  whether  the  $5.00  in  question  is 
compensation  or  reimbursement  for  expenses,  is  a  judicial 
question  to  be  determined  by  the  substance  and  reasonable 
effect  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  60; 
and  the  courts  are  not  concluded  by  mere  declarations  in  the 
act. 

As  was  said  in  the  case  of  Peay  v.  Nolan,  7  S.  W.  (2d) 
Tenn.  815,  at  1.  c.  819: 

"The  constitutionality  of  an  act  depends  on  its  real 
character,  and  on  the  end  designed  to  be  accomplished, 
and  the  courts  are  not  concluded  by  mere  declarations, 
for  in  whatever  language  a  statute  may  be  framed,  its  pur- 
pose and  constitutional  validity  must  be  determined  by 
its  natural  and  reasonable  effect.  6  R.  C.  L.,  sec.  79; 
12  C.  J.,  sec.  219,  p.  787." 

The  court,  at  page  818,  further  said: 

"For  the  purpose  of  determining  the  constitutionality 
of  a  statute,  it  is  the  function,  of  the  court,  first,  to  ascer- 
tain its  meaning  by  the  application  of  ordinary  canons 
of  construction,  and  then  to  decide  whether,  as  thus  con- 
strued, the  enactment  is  within  the  scope  of  the  legisla- 
tive power.  The  construction  of  a  statute  which  brings 
it  in,  conflict  with  the  Constitution  will  nullify  it  as 
effectually  as  if  it  had,  in  express  terms,  been  enacted  in 
conflict  therewith.  Wherefore,  if  it  appears  from  a  view 
of  the  act  of  appropriation  that  its  natural  and  reason- 
able effect  is  to  supplement  and  increase  the  compensa- 
tion of  members  of  the  General  Assembly,  it  would 
be  void." 

The  court,  in  the  above  case,  held  that  a  gross  appro- 
priation of  $750  as  expenses  to  each  member  of  the  General 
Assembly  was  in  effect  an,  increase  of  their  compensation,  and 
thereby  void,  because  in  excess  of  the  amount  fixed  by  Sec- 
tion 23  of  Article  II  of  the  Constitution  of  Tennessee. 

In  the  case  of  State  v.  Tracy,  190  N.  E.  (Ohio)  463,  the 
court  was  construing  an  act  of  the  Ohio  General  Assembly 
appropriating  a  sum  to  pay  the  members  of  the  90th  General 


70  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Assembly  at  a  rate  not  to  exceed  $4.00  per  day  for  room  and 
board  for  each  legislative  day.  On  the  one  hand,  it  was  con- 
tended that  the  appropriation  was  in  effect  an  increase  in  the 
compensation  of  the  members  of  the  General  Assembly,  pro- 
hibited by  the  Constitution,  and  on  the  other  hand,  it  was 
contended  that  such  appropriation  was  for  reimbursement  of 
expenses.  The  court  at  1.  c.  467,  stated: 

"Relator  insists  that  compensation  is  one  thing  and 
expense  is  another.  That  is  quite  true,  but  they  trot 
along  hand  in  hand,  and,  when  used  in  connection  with 
members  of  the  General  Assembly,  or  any  other  public 
officer  for  that  matter,  they  bear  a  close  relationship. 

"Where  did  the  money  that  paid  for  the  room  and 
board  for  members  during  special  sessions  of  the  Ninetieth 
General  Assembly  since  January  30,  1934,  come  from: 
It  must  have  come  from  the  pockets  of  the  members. 
It  was  their  money.  It  could  make  no  difference  whether 
the  particular  money  was  salary  and  mileage,  or  the  pro- 
ceeds of  a  sale  of  private  property.  The  money  has  been 
expended,  consequently  the  money  provided  by  House 
Bill  No,  4  would  be  reimbursement,  and  the  money  for 
future  payments  would  fall  within  the  same  class  aa 
expense  accounts  that  are  required  to  be  made  out  and 
filed  at  the  end  of  each  week.  The  legislator  must  have 
lived  the  week  before  he  can  get  any  money.  Having 
lived  the  week,  it  is  safe  to  assume  that  he  paid  for  his 
living,  and  the  $4  per  day  goes  to  replace  the  dollars  he 
has  taken  out  of  his  pocket.  It  is  compensation/' 

Conceding  the  right  of  the  General  Assembly  to  provide 
for  legislative  expenses,  which  right  is  universally  recognized* 
we  are  still  confronted  with  the  question  of  whether  an  allow- 
ance, such  as  is  provided  for  in  Senate  Committee  Substitute 
for  Senate  Bill  No,  60,  is  a  legislative  expense  which  may 
be  properly  allowed  or  whether  it  is  an  increase  in  compe&sa* 
tion  which  is  expressly  prohibited, 

In  the  case  of  State  v.  Turner,  233  Pac,  (Ka&s.)  5ltf 
page  510,  the  court  had  under  construction  the  validity  of  an 
act  of  the  Legislature  which  provided  for  the  payment  of  $5.00 
per  day  for  expense  money  for  each  member  of  the  General 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  71 

Assembly  and  to  the  Lieutenant  Governor,  for  each  day  of 
any  regular  or  special  session  of  the  Legislature.  Section  3 
of  Article  II  of  the  Kansas  Constitution  fixed  the  compensa- 
tion of  members  of  the  Legislature  at  $3.00  for  each  day's 
actual  service  and  15c  for  each  mile  traveled  by  the  usual 
route  in  going  to  and  returning  from  the  place  of  meeting. 
The  court,  at  1.  c.,  page  511,  said: 

"An,  examination  of  section  3  of  article  2  of  the  Con- 
stitution is  necessary.  It  makes  provision  for  the  pay- 
ment of  expenses  in  going  to  and  returning  from  the 
place  at  which  the  Legislature  meets.  No  other  expenses 
are  provided  for.  The  principle  of  statutory  construc- 
tions, expressio  unis  est  exclusio  alterius  (the  expression 
of  one  thing  is  the  exclusion  of  another)  will  be  of  some 
assistance  in  reaching  a  correct  conclusion. 


"If  the  maxim  'expressio  unius  est  exclusio  alterius'  applies, 
all  personal  expenses  of  legislators  other  than  mileage  are 
-excluded  by  the  constitutional  provision. 

*"(2)  All  legislative  expenses  may  be  properly  paid. 
The  expenses  that  may  be  paid  are  not  those  that  are 
incurred  by  a  member  of  the  Legislature  because  he  is 
at  the  capital  city;  they  are  those  that  are  incurred  by 
him  it*  the  performance  of  his  duties.  They  are  legisla- 
tive expenses,  not  personal  expenses.  The  distinction  be- 
tween expenses  that  are  legislative  and  those  that  are 
personal  is  that  legislative  expenses  are  those  that  are 
necessary  to  enable  the  Legislature  to  properly  perform 
its  functions,  while  those  that  are  personal  are  those  that 
must  be  incurred  by  a  member  of  the  Legislature  in  order 
to  be  present  at  the  place  of  meeting — expenses  for  his 
personal  comfort  and  convenience,  which  have  nothing  to 
do  with  the  performance  of  his  duty  as  a  member  of  the 
Legislature.  Personal  expenses  are  those  incurred  for 
rooms,  meals,  laundry,  communications  with  their  homes, 
and  other  things  of  like  character.  ........" 

The  court,  in  the  above  case,  held  that  the  act  in  question 
was  in  violation  of  Section  3  of  Article  II  of  the  Constitution, 


72  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

which  made  provision  for  the  payment  of  expenses  for  going 
to  and  returning  from  the  place  where  the  Legislature  meets, 
and  in  violation  of  Section  15  of  Article  I  of  the  Constitution 
prohibiting  an  increase  of  an  officer's  compensation  during 
his  term  of  office. 

The  decision  in  State  v.  Turner,  supra,  has  been  followed 
by  the  courts  of  a  number  of  other  states. 

The  case  of  Dixon  v.  Shaw,  253,  Pac.  (Okla.),  page  500, 
was  a  proceeding  in  mandamus  to  compel  the  State  Auditor 
to  allow  and  pay  bills  for  expenses  incurred  by  members  of 
the  Legislature  in  payment  of  hotel  room  rent  and  meals,  as 
authorized  by  House  Resolution  No.  2.  Section  21  of  Article 
V  of  the  Constitution  of  Oklahoma  provides  that  members  of 
the  Legislature  shall  receive  $6.00  per  diem  for  their  services 
during  the  session  of  the  Legislature  and  lOc  per  mile  for 
every  mile  of  necessary  travel  in  going  to  and  returning  from 
the  place  of  meeting  of  the  Legislature  on  the  most  usual 
route;  and  shall  receive  no  other  compensation.  The  court 
held  that  this  was  a  grant  and  an  inhibition  and  that  the 
mileage  and  per  diem  constitute  the  granted  compensation  and 
that  any  other  allowance  to  tlie  members,  appropriated  out 
of  public  funds  for  room  rent  and  meals  while  at  the  capital 
attending  the  sessions  of  the  Legislature,  was  purely  personal 
to  the  members  and  was  compensation  other  than  that  pro- 
vided, and  was  therefore  prohibited.  The  court  at  L  c,»  page 
504,  said: 

"„  .  ,  We  not  only  approve,  but  adopt,  the  rea- 
soning of  the  Supreme  Court  of  the  state  of  Kansas,  in 
the  said  case  of  Griffith  v.  Turner,  as  to  the  distinction 
between  expenses  that  are  legislative  and  amply  within 
the  authority  of  that  body  to  provide  and  use,  and  those 
which  are  purely  personal  in  their  nature,  and  by  reason 
thereof,  are,  under  the  said  section  21  of  the  Oklahoma 
Constitution  an  allowance  of  a  compensation  other  thau 
that  provided  in  the  said  section,  A  rule  well  recognized 
and  often  quoted  in  its  Latin  terminology  is*  *Expm$io 
unim  e$t  exclmio  alterim,*  When  said  provisions  are 
called  in  question  as  here,  we  reach  txo  conclusion,  but 
the  language  used  is  to  be  measured  by  such  a  well- 
recognized  rule  existent  at  the  time  of  the  adoption  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  73 

the  Constitution.  But  irrespective  of  rules  of  interpre- 
tation, we  think  that  the  language  employed  by  makers 
of  the  basic  law  of  the  state  should  not  be  given  a  strained 
or  subtle  meaning,  but  such  meaning  as  the  average 
citizen  would  conclude  the  language  imports.  This  for 
the  reason  that  the  electorate,  in  ratifying  the  document 
and  thereby  breathing  life  into  the  same,  considered  the 
provisions  as  the  language  used  fairly  imports.  Compen- 
sation, as  used  in  the  said  section,  refers  to  both  the  per 
diem  and  the  mileage,  and  no  other  personal  [sic]  to  the 
member  is  permitted.  The  place  of  performance  of  serv- 
ice is  at  the  capital.  The  living  expenses  in  performance 
of  the  duty  of  the  members  cannot  be  added  to  the 
compensation  expressly  allowed." 

In  the  case  of  Gallarno  v.  Long,  243  N.  W,  (Iowa)  719,  the 
court  had  under  construction  an  act  of  the  General  Assembly, 
allowing  each  member  of  the  Legislature  and  the  Lieutenant 
Governor  his  actual,  necessary  expenses  incurred  while  in 
attendance  of  a  session  of  the  Legislature  which  shall  in  no 
case  exceed  $500  for  any  regular  session.  Section  25  of  Arti- 
cle III  of  the  Iowa  Constitution  provides  that  each  member 
of  the  General  Assembly  shall  receive  $3.00  per  diem  while 
in  session  and  the  further  sum  of  $3.00  for  every  20  miles 
traveled  in  going  to  and  returning  from  the  session  place  by 
the  nearest  traveled  route;  after  which  they  shall  receive 
such  compensation  as  shall  be  fixed  by  law;  but  no  General 
Assembly  shall  have  the  power  to  increase  the  compensation 
of  its  own  members.  Pursuant  to  the  act  of  the  Legislature, 
various  members  filed  diverse  claims  for  board,  room,  taxi- 
cab  hire,  and  other  expenses.  The  court,  in  passing  upon  the 
validity  of  the  act,  at  1.  c.,  page  722,  said: 

"The  great  weight  of  authority  in  America,  as  indicated 
by  the  following  cases,  is  to  the  effect  that  there  is  a  dis- 
tinction between  legislative,  or  governmental,  and  per- 
sonal expenses.  „  .  *  ."  (Citing  many  cases)  * 

And  further,  at  L  c.  723,  the  court  held: 

"So  far,  then,  as  the  authorities  are  concerned,  it  is 
apparent  that  chapter  1,  Acts  of  the  Forty-Third  General 


74  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Assembly,  contemplates  compensation,  as  distinguished 
from  legislative  expenses.  Such  expenses  thus  contem- 
plated by  the  act  under  consideration  are  personal  and 
not  legislative.  Hence  they  amount  to  additional  com- 
pensation.  This  conclusion  finds  support  in  the  history 
of  the  Iowa  Constitution,  tjie  history  of  the  times  under 
which  it  was  adopted,  the  legislation  thereunder,  and  the 
evils  sought  to  be  avoided  by  the  Constitution.  Those 
historical  and  other  matters  may  be  taken  into  considera- 
tion when  interpreting  the  Constitution ' ' 

In  the  case  of  Peck  v.  State,  120  Pac.  (Idaho)  820,  the 
court  was  construing  an  appropriation  act  of  the  Idaho  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  appropriating  a  sum  of  money  to  pay  the 
expenses  of  the  members  of  the  Legislature  actually  expended 
by  them  for  subsistence  and  lodging  while  absent  from  their 
usual  places  of  residence  for  services  to  the  State  of  Idaho, 
at  a  rate  not  exceeding  $5,00  per  day.  Article  III,  Section 
23  of  the  Constitution  of  Idaho  provided  that  each  member 
of  the  Legislature  shall  receive  for  his  services  the  sum  not 
exceeding  $5.00  per  day  from  the  commencement  of  the 
session,  but  such  pay  shall  not  exceed  for  each  member  $300 
for  per  diem  allowance  for  any  one  session,  and  shall  receive 
each  the  sum  of  lOc  per  mile  each  way  by  the  usual  traveled 
route.  The  Legislature  enacted  a  statute  pursuant  to  the 
authority  of  the  above  Constitutional  provision.  The  court, 
at  L  c,,  page  822,  stated; 

"It  is  a  universally  recognized  rule  of  construction  that, 
where  a  constitution  or  statute  specifies  certain  things, 
the  designation  of  such  things  excludes  all  others.  People 
v,  Goldman,  I  Idaho  714,  23  Pac,  St.  Rep-  714;  59  C.  J. 
984,  Sec.  582;  16  C.  X  S.»  61,  Sec,  2L  The  statute  pro- 
vides that  members  of  the  legislature  shall  receive  $5.00 
per  day  for  their  services  and,  in  addition  thereto,  'shall 
receive  each  the  sum  of  ten  cents  per  mile  each  way  by 
the  usual  traveled  route/  That  is  an  express  declaration 
that  each  mem!>er  of  the  legislature  shall  receive  $5*00 
per  day  for  his  services  and  ten  cents  per  mile  each  way 
for  traveling.  The  specification  of  per  diem  and  mileage 
therein  was  evidently  intended  as  a  definite  declaration 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  75 

of  the  amount  to  be  received  by  each  member  of  the 
legislature  for  services  and  expenses,  and  the  limit  thereof." 

The  court,  at  1.  c.  822,  further  held: 

"11  we  should  so  construe  Chapter  73  as  to  read  into  it 
a  grant  to  the  present  members  of  the  legislature  of  the 
right  to  reimbursement  of  the  amounts  of  their  expenses 
for  board  and  lodging,  the  act  would  be  special,  not  gen- 
eral in  its  application,  for  nothing  can  be  found  to  support 
a  construction  that  the  board  and  lodging  of  future  legis- 
lators are  to  be  paid  for  at  the  expense  of  the  state.  The 
appropriation  made  by  Chapter  73  is  not  available  to 
future  legislators.  (I.  C.  A.,  Sec.  653409,  as  amended  by 
1941  Sess.  L.  p.  141,  chapt.  74.)  Chapter  73  is  clearly 
intended  to  appropriate  money  to  reimburse  the  present 
members  of  the  legislature  for  their  actual  and  necessary 
*expenses  for  subsistence  and  lodging,  while  absent  from 
their  usual  places  of  residence,  in  the  service  of  the  state. 
If  we  construe  that  appropriation  act  to  also  grant  to 
the  present  legislators  the  right  to  the  allowance,  we 
would  render  it  void  because  of  conflict  with  Article  III, 
Section,  19  of  the  Constitution,  which  provides: 

**  'The  legislature  shall  not  pass  local  or  special  laws  in 
any  of  the  following  enumerated  cases,  that  is  to  say: 


**  'Creating,  increasing  or  decreasing  fees,  percentages  or 
allowances  of  public  officers  during  the  term  for  which 
said  officers  are  elected  or  appointed/  " 

While  our  Constitution  does  not  specifically  prohibit  local 
or  special  laws  increasing  the  allowance  of  public  officers  dur- 
ing the  terms  for  which  said  officers  are  elected  or  appointed, 
it  docs  specifically  prohibit  any  local  or  special  law  "where  a 
general  law  can  be  made  applicable," 

A  few  cases  might  be  cited  which  seem  to  hold  contrary 
to  the  views  expressed  in,  the  above  cited  cases.  In  the  case 
of  Christopherson  v.  Reeves,  44  So.  Dak.  634,  it  was  held 
that  the  Legislature  could  appropriate  the  sum  of  $200  to 
each  member  as  an  expense  allowance  in  addition  to  the  com- 


76  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

pensation  for  their  services  fixed  by  the  Constitution.  This 
case  has  been  reviewed  and  repudiated  by  many  of  the  courts 
of  other  jurisdictions. 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  Weldon  v.  Thomason,  142 
Tenn.  527,  the  court  upheld  an  appropriation  of  money  for 
stenographic  work  and  other  necessary  expenses  of  legis- 
lators, in  additiion  to  the  regularly  provided  compensation,. 
The  appropriation,  however,  was  upheld  on  the  presumption 
that  the  appropriation  in  question  was  for  legislative  expenses 
rather  than  for  personal  expenses,  and  in  the  case  of  Pcay  v. 
Nolan,  supra,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Tennessee  later  held  that 
a  statute  appropriating  $750  to  each  member  of  the  Legisla- 
ture for  postage,  stenographic  hire,  and  other  necessary  ex- 
penses violated  the  constitutional  provision  fixing  compensa- 
tion of  members  of  the  General  Assembly. 

Numerous  other  authorities,  holding  acts  similar  to  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No,  60  unconstitutional 
under  provisions  similar  to  our  own  Constitution,  could  be 
cited.  I  think,  however,  that  the  decisions  referred  to  herein 
clearly  demonstrate  that  by  the  overwhelming  weight  of  au- 
thority, acts  allowing  money  to  members  of  the  General 
Assembly  for  subsistence,  while  attending  legislative  sessions, 
amount  to  an  increase  of  compensation  within  the  meaning 
of  the  provisions  of  the  various  Constitutions  fixing  the  com- 
pensation of  members  of  the  General  Assembly  and  prohibit- 
ing an  increase  thereof  during  their  term  of  office. 

The  weight  of  authority  is  also  to  the  effect  that  even  if 
such  allowances  were  construed  to  be  reimbursements  for 
expenses,  they  would  still  be  unconstitutional  where  the  Con- 
stitutions provided  an  allowance  for  mileage  under  the  doctrine 
of  expressio  uniu$  est  exclmio  alter  ius* 

I  fully  appreciate  the  tremendous  task  that  has  been 
imposed  upon  the  members  of  the  03rd  General  Assembly  by 
virtue  of  the  adoption  of  the  new  Constitution,  I  realize  that 
the  members  will  be  in  session  for  a  much  longer  period  of 
time  than  usual  I  have  no  doubt  of  the  good  faith  of  the 
members  of  the  General  Assembly  who  enacted  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  00.  1  am  also  of  the 
opinion  that  the  $5»00  allowance  per  day  to  members  of  the 
General  Assembly  would  be  reasonable,  if  not  prohibited* 
However,  Constitutions  must  receive  a  consistent  and  uniform 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  77 

interpretation.  Framers  of  the  new  Constitution  must  have 
realized  that  its  adoption  would  throw  many  added  burdens 
on  the  present  General  Assembly,  and  they  could  have  pro- 
vided for  additional  compensation  or  expenses  to  members  of 
the  General  Assembly  if  they  had  seen  fit  to  do  so.  Many 
persons,  familiar  with  the  duties  of  the  General  Assembly, 
will  agree  that  their  compensation  and  expense  allowances 
are  entirely  inadequate.  However,  the  sole  remedy  lies  in 
changing  the  Constitution. 

I  reluctantly  conclude  that  the  allowance  to  members  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  for  lodging  and  meals  while  away 
from  their  homes  in  connection  with  their  legislative  duties, 
as  provided  in  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  60,  is,  in  effect,  an  increase  of  their  compensation  in  viola- 
tion of  Section  16  of  Article  III  and  Section  13  of  Article  VII 
of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri,  and  is,  therefore,  unconsti- 
tutional and  void. 

Said  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  60 
expressly  applies  only  to  the  members  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  and  thereby  excludes  members  of  future  General 
Assemblies.  It  is  my  opinion  that  this  is  a  special  law  and 
therefore  in  violation  of  the  provisions  of  Section  40  of  Article 
III  of  the  Constitution  which  prohibits  the  General  Assembly 
from  enacting  any  local  or  special  law. 

For  the  above  and  foregoing  reasons  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  60  is  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


78  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  4,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  115S-J.157 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  4,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51, 
entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  15328,  15329  and  15330,  Article 
1,  Chapter  133,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  relating  to  the  creation  of  a  State  Park  Board, 
and  providing  for  the  appointment  of  members,  officers 
and  other  personnel,  and  defining  the  powers  and  duties 
of  said  members  and  officers,  and  providing  that  all  laws 
or  parts  of  laws  in  conflict  with  the  provisions  of  this 
Article  are  repealed,  and  to  enact  nine  new  sections  in 
lieu  thereof  relating  to  the  same  subject,  and  to  be  known 
as  Sections  15328,  15329,  15330,  15330a,  153301),  1533()c, 
15330d,  15330e,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No*  51  seeks  to 
repeal  Sections  15328,  15329  and  15330,  Article  1»  Chapter 
133,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  State 
Park  Board  and  provides  for  the  creation  of  another  State 
Park  Board  composed  of  six  members. 

Although  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51  is 
more  verbose  than  the  present  State  Park  Board  law,  in  my 
opinion,  it  does  not  give  the  proposed  new  Board  any  more 
power  or  duties  than  the  present  State  Park  Board  has  and 
exercises  under  the  provision  of  Article  1»  Chapter  133,  supra. 
It  seems  to  be  merely  the  substitution  of  one  board  for  another 
board. 

Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51  purports  to 
carry  an  emergency  clause.  It  reads  as  follows: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  79 

"Section  2.  In  order  that  this  act  shall  become  effective 
July  1,  1945,  an  emergency  exists  within  the  meaning  of 
the  Constitution;  therefore,  this  act  shall  take  effect  and 
be  in  force  from  and  after  its  passage  and  approval." 

It  is  provided  by  Section  29,  Article  III  of  the  Constitu- 
tion of  1945  as  follows: 

"No  law  passed  by  the  general  assembly  shall  take  effect 
until  ninety  days  after  the  adjournment  of  the  session 
at  which  it  was  enacted,  except  an  appropriation  act  or 
in  case  of  an  emergency  which  must  be  expressed  in  the 
preamble  or  in  the  body  of  the  act,  the  general  assembly 
shall  otherwise  direct  by  a  two-thirds  vote  of  the  members 
elected  to  each  house,  taken  by  yeas  and  nays;  provided, 
if  the  general  assembly  recesses  for  thirty  days  or  more 
it  may  prescribe  by  joint  resolution  that  laws  previously 
passed  and  not  effective  shall  take  effect  ninety  days  from 
the  beginning  of  such  recess." 

This  is  the  comparable  provision  to  Section  36,  Article 
IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1875,  as  amended  by  the  constitu- 
tional amendment  found  in  Laws  of  1943,  page  1085. 

In  addition  to  Section  29,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution 
of  1945,  there  now  exists  a  statute,  being  Section  659,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  provides  in  part  as  follows: 

"A  law  passed  by  the  general  assembly  shall  take  effect 
ninety  days  after  the  adjournment  of  the  session  at 
which  it  is  enacted,  subject  to  the  following  exceptions: 

"(a)  A  law  necessary  for  the  immediate  preservation  of 
the  public  peace,  health  or  safety,  which  emergency  must 
be  expressed  in  the  body  or  preamble  of  the  act  and  which 
is  declared  to  be  thus  necessary  by  the  general  assembly, 
by  a  vote  of  two-thirds  of  its  members  elected  to  each 
house,  said  vote  to  be  taken  by  yeas  and  nays,  and 
entered  on  the  journal,  or  a  law  making  an  appropriation 
for  the  current  expenses  of  the  state  government,  for  the 
maintenance  of  the  state  institutions  or  for  the  support 
of  public  schools,  shall  take  effect  as  of  the  hour  and 
minute  of  its  approval  by  the  governor;  ..*.'* 


80  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

It  is  my  opinion  that  said  Section  659,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  remains  in  full  force  and  effect  for  the 
reason  that  under  Section  2  of  the  Schedule  appended  to  the 
Constitution  of  1945  there  is  the  following  provision: 

"Section  2.  All  laws  in  force  at  the  time  of  the  adoption 
of  this  Constitution  and  consistent  therewith  shall  remain 
in  full  force  and  effect  until  amended  or  repealed  by  the 
general  assembly.  All  laws  inconsistent  with  this  Con- 
stitution, unless  sooner  repealed  or  amended  to  conform 
with  this  Constitution,  shall  remain  in  full  force  and 
effect  until  July  1,  1946." 

Section  659,  supra,  has  not  been  amended  or  repealed 
by  this  General  Assembly. 

While  it  is  true  Section  29  of  Article  III  of  the  Consti- 
tution of  1945,  among  other  things  says: 

"„  .  .  provided,  if  the  general  assembly  recesses  for 
thirty  days  or  more  it  may  prescribe  by  joint  resolution 
that  laws  previously  passed  and  not  effective  shall  take 
effect  ninety  days  from  the  beginning  of  such  recess." 

It  is  my  opinion,  however,  that  until  legislation  is  en- 
acted repealing  or  amending  Section  659,  supra,  that  said 
section  remains  in  full  force  and  effect.  Therefore,  said  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  51  if  signed  would  not 
go  into  effect  until  ninety  days  after  the  adjournment  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  unless  it  would  become  effective 
sooner  by  reason  of  the  purported  emergency  clause. 

There  have  been  no  appellate  court  decisions  construing 
the  provisions  found  in  the  Constitution  of  1945.  However, 
since  the  provisions  in  the  new  Constitution  are  so  similar  to 
the  provisions  found  in  the  Constitution  of  1875,  I  think  that 
the  cases  decided  under  the  Constitution  of  1875  will  be 
controlling* 

It  has  been  uniformly  held  that  in  construing  the  effect 
of  an  emergency  clause  attached  to  a  bill  that  Section  30, 
Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1875  must  be  harmonised 
with  Section  57,  Article  IV  of  the  same  Constitution*  apply- 
ing to  the  referendum*  &&d  which  contains  the  following 
clause; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  81 

"Section  57.  ...  The  second  power  is  the  referendum, 
and  it  may  be  ordered  (except  as  to  laws  necessary  for 
the  immediate  preservation  of  the  public  peace,  health 
or  safety  and  laws  making  appropriations  for  the  current 
expenses  of  the  state  government,  for  the  maintenance  of 
the  state  institutions  and  for  the  support  of  public  schools) 
either  by  the  petitions  signed"  etc. 

Section  52,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  reads 
as  follows: 

"A  referendum  may  be  ordered  (except  as  to  laws  nec- 
essary for  the  immediate  preservation  of  the  public 
peace,  health  or  safety,  and  laws  making  appropriations 
for  the  current  expenses  of  the  state  government,  for  the 
maintenance  of  state  institutions  and  for  the  support  of 
public  schools)  .  .  .  ." 

In  State  ex  rel.  Harvey  v.  Linville  et  al,  300  S.  W.  1066, 
the  court  said,  1.  c.  1068: 

"It  was  held  in  the  case  of  State  v.  Sullivan,  283  Mo. 
546,  224  S.  W.  327,  that  these  two  sections  of  the  Consti- 
tution must  be  construed  together;  that  a  declaration  in 
a  bill  that  it  was  an  emergency  measure  within  the  mean- 
ing of  the  Constitution,  did  not  make  it  so;  that  the  emer- 
gency must  appear  in  fact  upon,  the  face  of  the  bill  to  be 
within  the  terms  of  the  Constitution,  authorizing  an 
emergency  clause  which  would  put  the  act  into  imme- 
diate effect. 


"Plainly  the  emergency  clause  in  the  act  does  not  state 
a  condition  to  which  the  emergency  provision  of  the  Con- 
stitution could  apply. 

"It  was  held  in  the  Sullivan  Case  that  any  act  to  which 
the  referendum  might  apply  could  not  be  an  emergency 
measure;  that  by  the  operation  of  section  36,  art*  4,  the 
act  would  not  go  into  effect  until  90  days,  if  it  was  one 
to  which,  under  section  57  of  the  article,  the  referendum 
applied,  .  .  .  ." 


82  *  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  Westhues  v.  Sullivan,  283  Mo. 
546,  the  court  said,  1.  c.  576-577: 

"There  is  no  express  declaration  in  the  emergency  clause 
to  this  act,  bringing  it  within  the  exceptions  contained 
in  Section  57  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution.  The  only 
laws  excepted  from  the  referendum  under  this  constitu- 
tional provision  are  'those  necessary  for  the  immediate 
preservation  of  the  public  peace,  health  or  safety,  and 
laws  making  appropriations  for  the  current  expenses  of 
the  state  government,  for  the  maintenance  of  the  state 
institutions  and  for  the  support  of  public  schools.'  The 
emergency  clause  to  this  act  does  not  claim  the  act  to 
be  one  of  the  class  mentioned  in  this  exception.  Under 
Section  57,  Article  IV,  all  measures  not  falling  within 
this  excepted  class  are  subject  to  the  referendum. 

"The  emergency  clause  to  the  measure  under  considera- 
tion does  not  attempt  to  declare  such  measure  to  be  of 
the  excepted  class  in  the  constitutional  provision  named. 
It  only  declares  in  a  way,  the  legislative  reason  for  the 
conceived  emergency.  It  does  not  declare  that  the  meas- 
ure is  'necessary  for  the  immediate  preservation  of  the 
public  peace,  health  or  safety.'  If  it  had  so  declared  the 
declaration  would  have  been  false  on  the  face  of  the 
measure  itself.  But  for  our  present  purpose  it  suffices 
to  say  that  the  emergency  clause  does  not  bring  the 
measure  within  the  excepted  class  named  in  the  Consti- 
tution. So  that  unless  a  mere  emergency  clause,  will 
exempt  the  measure  from  referendum,  the  contentions  of 
plaintiffs  and  relator  must  fail  They  urge  that  under 
Section  36  of  Article  IV,  the  Legislature  has  the  power, 
by  expressing  an  emergency  in  the  face  of  the  bill,  and 
passing  the  emergency  clause  by  a  two-thirds  vote,  to 
put  any  law  into  immediate  effect. 

"We  do  not  so  view  the  matter.  The  force  and  effect  of 
Section  57,  when  read  with  Section  36  of  said  Article  IV» 
is  to  withdraw  from  the  power  of  the  Legislature  to  put 
into  immediate  effect  any  measure  subject  to  the  refer- 
endum. The  two  sections  must  be  read  together  and 
made  to  harmonize  in  the  light  of  the  history  of  the  con- 
stitutional provisions.  Section  57  contemplates  that  'any 


GOVERNOK  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  83 

act'  of  the  Legislature  is  subject  to  the  referendum,  save 
and  except  the  measures  therein  specifically  named. 

99 

From  the  above  authorities,  it  is  plain  that  Section  2  of 
said  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51  does  not 
declare  that  an  emergency  exists  within  the  meaning  of  the 
above  cited  constitutional  provisions  and,  therefore,  is  a  mere 
nullity.  Furthermore,  even  if  it  had  declared  that  said  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51  is  necessary  for  the 
immediate  preservation  of  the  public  peace,  health  or  safety, 
it  would  be  false  on  its  face.  Certainly  the  turning  over  of 
the  duties  of  one  board  to  another  does  not  create  an  emer- 
gency which  would  effect  the  peace,  health  or  safety  of  the 
people  of  this  State. 

Section  12  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  reads 
as  follows: 

"The  executive  department  shall  consist  of  all  state  elec- 
tive and  appointive  officials  and  employees  except  the 
officials  and  employees  of  the  legislative  and  judicial 
departments.  In  addition  to  the  governor  and  lieutenant 
governor  there  shall  be  a  state  auditor,  secretary  of 
state,  attorney  general,  a  state  treasurer  and  a  depart- 
ment of  revenue,  department  of  education,  department  of 
highways,  department  of  conservation,  department  of 
agriculture  and  such  additional  departments,  not  exceed- 
ing five  in  number,  as  may  hereafter  be  established  by 
law.  Unless  discontinued  all  present  or  future  boards, 
bureaus,  commissions  and  other  agencies  of  the  state 
exercising  administrative  or  executive  authority  shall  be 
assigned  by  the  governor  to  the  department  to  which 
their  respective  powers  and  duties  are  germane." 

Under  the  provisions  of  the  above  section  the  State  Park 
Board,  unless  discontinued  by  the  legislature,  will  have  to  be 
assigned  by  the  Governor  to  the  department  to  which  its 
respective  powers  and  duties  are  germane.  In  my  opinion 
it  is  unwise  at  this  time  to  create  new  boards  which  under 
the  provisions  of  Section  12,  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution 
of  1945,  will  have  to  be  discontinued  by  the  legislature  in  the 


84  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

near  future,  or  which  will  have  to  be  assigned  by  the  Governor 
to  one  of  the  fourteen  departments  of  government  now  in 
existence  or  to  be  hereafter  created. 

In  creating  the  new  Park  Board  in  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  51  the  terms  of  the  members,  after  the 
members  of  the  first  board  have  served  their  terms,  are  for 
six  years.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the  terms  of  members  of 
boards,  bureaus  and  commissions  under  the  Governor  should 
not  exceed  four  years.  Otherwise,  we  have  the  situation  of 
a  Governor's  predecessor  having  made  appointments  which 
overlap  the  entire  term  of  the  Governor.  The  Governor  is 
restrained  from  making  appointments  for  his  own  adminis- 
tration, although  he  is  held  responsible,  as  the  head  of  the 
State  government,  for  the  acts  of  those  appointed  by  his 
predecessor.  The  Constitution  of  1945  recognized  this  prin- 
ciple in  local  government  and  provided  that  the  terms  of  city 
or  county  officers  shall  not  exceed  four  years,  (Section,  10, 
Article  VI).  I  think  the  same  principle  should  apply  to  the 
boards,  bureaus  and  commissions  of  the  State  government 
which  are  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Governor. 

For  the  above  and  foregoing  reasons  Committee  Substi- 
tute for  House  Bill  No.  51  is  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
July  13,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri; 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No,  429,  entitled; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  85 

"AN  ACT 

"Appropriating  money  for  the  support  of  the  State 
Government  for  payment  of  certain  contingent  and  inci- 
dental expenses  of  the  State  Government,  for  the  period 
beginning  January  1,  1945  and  ending  June  30,  1945;  and 
to  appropriate  money  for  the  payment  of  various  forms 
of  relief;  for  the  several  departments  of  the  State  Govern- 
ment, several  boards,  bureaus,  and  commissions  and  state 
officers,  and  persons,  firms  and  corporations  for  the  pay- 
ment of  which  the  state  may  be  liable,  and  appropriating 
funds  for  other  purposes  for  the  period  beginning  January 
1,  1945,  and  ending  June  30,  1945  and  prior  years,  with 
an  emergency  clause." 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said 
reasons  accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said 
items  and  portions  of  items. 

I. 

Section  1.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State 
Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  fund,  the 
sum  of  Ten  Thousand  Dollars  ($10,000.00)  to  the  State 
Auditor  to  pay  for  personal  services  in  connection,  with 
the  administration  of  the  Sales  Tax  Law  for  the  period 
beginning  January  1,  1945  and  ending  June  30,  1945, 
this  amount  in  addition  to  the  amount  appropriated  for 
a  like  period  in  House  Bill  No.  5,  Section  11  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly,  as  follows: 


A,    Personal  Service: 

For  salaries  and  wages  of  accountants,  auditors, 
inspectors,  lawyers,  bookkeepers,  cashiers, 
supervisor,  assistant  supervisors,  stenographers, 
clerks,  janitors,  and  all  other  necessary  em- 
ployees  ,,.,,..  .$10,000.00 


Total ,.,...,.  ,$10,000.00 


86  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I  am  approving  the  sum  of  $5,000.00  of  this  appropriation 
and  disallowing  the  sum  of  $5,000.00  for  the  reason  that  the 
full  amount  is  not  now  needed,  which  will  leave  in  effect  the 
sum  of  $5,000.00,  which  amount  is  hereby  approved. 

II. 

The  following  item,  Section  25,  Page  12,  lines  27  and  28 
of  the  printed  bill  as  Truly  Agreed  to  and  Finally  Passed, 

From  that 
part  of  the 
Ordinary  Revenue 
From  set  aside  for 

General         the  free  public 
Revenue  schools 

Bethel  W.  Eiserman,  Admin- 
istrator Estate  of  John  S. 
Sweet $697.57  $348.79 

is  vetoed  and  disallowed  in  the  total  sum  of  $1,046.36  for  the 
reason  that  said  estate  is  indebted  to  the  State  of  Missouri 
for  inheritance  taxes  in  the  sum  of  approximately  $3,000.00 
and,  therefore,  is  not  entitled  to  be  paid  the  above  refund  for 
overpayment  of  inheritance  taxes. 

III. 

The  following  items,  Section  26,  Page  13,  lines  23  ai*d  24 
of  the  printed  bill  as  Truly  Agreed  to  and  Finally  Passed, 
McKesson  &  Robbins,  Inc.,  Kansas  City,  Missouri.  .$1,537,92 

I  am  approving  the  sum  of  $961.92  of  said  amount  and  dis- 
allowing the  sum  of  $576.00  for  the  reason  that  said  sum  of 
$576.00  is  a  duplication,  which  will  leave  in  effect  the  sum  of 
$961.92,  which  amount  is  hereby  approved. 

IV. 

The  following  item,  Section  26,  Page  13,  Line  28  of  the 
printed  bill  as  Truly  Agreed  To  and  Finally  Passed, 
Carl  Teal,  Hiwa,sse,  Arkansas ,  .$145.03 

I  am  vetoing  and  not  allowing  said  sum  of  $145*03  for  the 
following  reason:  Mr.  Teal  held  a  Wine  Solicitor's  License 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  87 

which  was  suspended  October  6,  1943  for  the  remainder  of  the 
license  year  expiring  June  30,  1944.  His  Wine  Solicitor's 
License  was  not  renewed.  Therefore,  he  can  not  use  stamps 
and  a  refund  in  stamps  should  not  be  made  to  him.  How- 
ever, I  think  he  should  be  paid  $145.03  in  cash  and  I  recom- 
mend that  the  General  Assembly  enact  the  necessary  appro- 
priation to  pay  said  sum  in  cash. 

V. 

Section  36.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State 
Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund,  the 
sum  of  Two  Hundred  Fifty  Dollars  ($250.00)  for  the 
relief  of  Mrs.  Elizabeth  Waers,  for  salary  due  for  the 
months  of  November  and  December,  1944,  as  a  duly 
elected  member  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly. 

I  hereby  veto  and  disallow  said  sum  of  $250.00.  My 
reason  for  vetoing  and  disallowing  said  appropriation  of  $250.00 
is  because  the  records  in  the  State  Auditor's  office  indicate 
that  Mrs.  Elizabeth  Waers  never  qualified  for  the  office  of 
Representative  from  Clinton  County,  Missouri.  However,  I 
am  informed  that  she  did  take  the  oath  of  office,  before  the 
county  clerk  of  Clinton,  County,  Missouri,  December  28, 
1944,  but  the  Speaker  and  Chief  Clerk  of  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives never  certified  her  name  to  the  State  Auditor  as 
a  member  of  the  House  of  Representatives.  However,  if  she 
did  properly  qualify  as  the  Representative  of  Clinton  County 
she  should  be  paid  out  of  the  appropriation  made  for  the 
General  Assembly  for  1943-1944  as  this  appropriation  does 
not  lapse  until  July  17,  1945. 

VI. 

Section  37.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue 
Fund,  the  sum  of  Two  Hundred  Fifty  Dollars  ($250.00) 
for  the  relief  of  Joseph  P.  Kieley,  for  salary  due  for  the 
months  of  November  and  December,  1944,  as  a  duly 
elected  member  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly. 

I  hereby  veto  and  disallow  said  sum  of  $250.00,  My 
reason  for  vetoing  and  disallowing  said  appropriation  in  the 


88  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

sum  of  $250.00  is  because  the  records  in  the  State  Auditor's 
office  show  that  Mr.  Kieley  was  paid  for  two  days  in  Novem- 
ber and  all  of  December,  1944  and,  therefore,  is  not  entitled 
to  the  sum  of  $250.00  as  set  forth  in  Section  37. 

VII. 

Section  41.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State 
Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund,  the 
sum  of  Twenty-five  Thousand  Dollars  ($25,000.00)  to  be 
set  up  as  a  Sales  Tax  Token  Revolving  Fund  for  the  use 
of  the  State  Auditor  for  the  period  beginning  January  1, 
1945  and  ending  June  30,  1945,  to  purchase  tokens  to  be 
used  in  connection  with  the  collection  of  the  sales  tax. 

I  am  approving  the  sum  of  $10,000.00  of  this  appropria- 
tion and  disallowing  the  sum  of  $15,000.00,  for  the  reason 
that  the  full  amount  is  not  now  needed,  which  will  leave  in 
effect  the  sum  of  $10,000.00,  which  amount  is  hereby  approved. 

VIII. 

Section  42.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  for  the  State 
Auditor  chargeable  to  the  Sales  Tax  Token  Revolving 
Fund,  for  the  purchase  and  distribution  of  new  sales  tax 
tokens  and  for  the  redemption  of  said  sales  tax  tokens 
after  same  are  issued  in,  accordance  with  Section  11413, 
Sales  Tax  Act  of  1943,  the  sum  of  Fifty  Thousand  Dol- 
lars ($50,000.00)  or  so  much  thereof  as  may  be  needed 
during  the  period  beginning  January  1,  1945  and  ending 
June  30,  1945  when  the  same  shall  have  been  collected 
from  the  sale  of  sales  tax  tokens  and  deposited  to  the 
credit  of  said  Sales  Tax  Token  Revolving  Fund.  The 
State  Auditor  shall  file  with  the  Governor  semi-annual 
reports  relating  to  this  fund,  as  provided  in  the  Consti- 
tution of  Missouri. 

I  am  approving  the  sum  of  $20,000.00  of  this  appropria- 
tion and  disallowing  the  sum  of  $30,000.00,  for  the  reason 
that  the  full  amount  is  not  now  needed,  which  will  leave  in 
effect  the  sum  of  $20,000.00,  which  amount  is  hereby  approved* 

On  July  13,  1945  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No,  429 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  89 

as  to  all  items  and  portions  of  items  thereof,  except  the  items 
and  portions  of  items  which  are,  as  in  this  message  above 
stated,  returned  without  my  approval. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY  14,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives ,  pp.  1472-1474- 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
July  14,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  232, 
entitled : 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  3711,  Chapter  29,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  workmen's  com- 
pensation law,  and  the  exemption  of  compensation  from 
attachment,  garnishment  and  execution,  and  the  allow- 
ance of  a  lien  for  attorney's  fees  and  the  regulation  and 
allowance  of  such  fees,  and  to  enact  a  new  section  in  lieu 
thereof  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter  and  to  be 
known  as  Section  3711,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

This  bill  would  remove  the  regulation  of  attorney  fees 
from  the  Workmen's  Compensation  Commission.  I  am  un- 
able to  find  any  necessity  for  the  enactment  of  this  bill.  It  is 
my  opinion  that  the  Missouri  Workmen's  Compensation  Com- 
mission has  been  very  fair  in  awarding  attorney  fees  in  com- 
pensation, cases.  In  fact,  the  average  fees  allowed  in  Mis- 
souri are  higher  than  the  average  for  the  United  States  as  a 


90  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

whole.    There  may  be  isolated  cases  where  an,  appeal  to  the 
courts  is  taken  and  an  attorney  does  an  extra  amount  of  work 
in  which  he  earns  more  than  the  Commission  allows,  but  as 
a  general  rule  the  allowance  by  the  Commission  is  reasonable 
and  adequate  for  the  amount  of  work  that  is  done.    We  must 
not  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  in  the  vast  majority  of  compen- 
sation cases  the  issues  are  limited  and  fairly  simple,  the  prep- 
aration necessary  is  usually  far  less  extensive  than  in  the 
ordinary  personal  injury  damage  suits,  and  the  adjudication 
more  prompt).     Therefore,  the  injured  person  gets  his  com- 
pensation and  the  lawyer  his  fee  in  a  shorter  period  of  time 
than  under  the  old  method  of  handling  personal  injury  suits. 
The  bill  has  the  following  provision  with  reference  to  the 
allowance  of  attorney  fees  as  a  lien  on  the  compensation 
(Page  2,  Line  10  of  the  printed  bill):  "if  requested  by  the 
employee's  attorney  so  to  do,  the  Commission  may  allow 
as  lien  on  the  compensation,  attorney's  fees  for  services  in 
connection  with  the  proceedings  for  compensation   .   .   .   ," 
This  is  new  matter  and  is  not  in  the  present  law.    I  think  the 
claimant  should  have  something  to  say  about  whether  or  not 
the  attorney  fees  should  be  a  lien  on  the  compensation.    The 
attorney  fee  is  being  deducted  from  the  employee's  compensa- 
tion, but  under  this  bill,  if  requested  by  the  employee's  attorney, 
the  fees  may  be  allowed  as  a  lien  on  the  compensation.    Under 
the  present  law,  "if  written  notice  is  given  to  the  Commission 
of  the  nature  and  extent  thereof,  the  Commission  may  allow 
as  lien  on  the  compensation,  reasonable  attorney's  fees  for 
services  in  connection  with  the  proceedings  for  compensation, 
if  such  services  are  found  to  be  necessary."    (underscoring  mine) 

1  can  see  no  need  for  a  change  in  the  wording  of  the  present 
law.    I  think  tihe  Commission  should  pas$  upon  the  reason- 
ableness of  the  attorney  fees  and  whether  or  not  they  are 
necessary,  and  whether  or  not  they  should  be  allowed  as  a 
lien  on  the  compensation.    The  same  is  true  of  the  allowance 
of  attorney  fees  on  appeal.    In  lines  22  to  25,  inclusive.  Page 

2  of  the  printed  bill,  it  says  "the  circuit  court  having  juris- 
diction over  the  appeal  from  the  commission,  shall  have  the 
right,  when  requested  by  the  employee  or  his  attorney  in 
writing,  to  fix  and  determine  the  fairness  and  reasonableness 
of  such  attorney's  fees,"    (underscoring  mine)    This  provision 
will  permit  the  circuit  court  on  request  of  the  attorney  in 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  91 

writing,  and  without  the  consent  of  the  employee,  to  deter- 
mine the  attorney  fees.  I  think  the  present  law  whereby  the 
necessity  and  reasonableness  of  the  attorney  fees  is  left  to 
the  Commission  is  the  safer  and  better  practice.  This  bill 
will  tend  to  confuse  by  dividing  the  jurisdiction  as  to  fixing 
and  determining  attorney  fees  between  the  Workmen's  Com- 
pensation Commission  and  the  courts. 

I  seriously  question  the  validity  of  the  emergency  clause. 
However,  assuming  that  it  is  valid,  then  the  same  reason  and 
argument  can  be  used  in  behalf  of  the  injured  employee  or 
his  widow  and  dependent  children  with  reference  to  the  war 
and  the  high  cost  of  living,  because  they  are  paying  the  bill, 
it  is  coming  out  of  their  compensation,  and  the  war  and  the 
high  cost  of  living  affects  the  injured  employee  or  his  widow 
and  dependent  children  just  the  same  as  it  does  the  lawyer. 
I  do  not  think  the  facts  justify  the  emergency  clause. 

Apparently  the  sole  purpose  of  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  232  is  to  allow  larger  fees  for  attorneys  repre- 
senting claimants.  This  bill  will  add  to  the  cost  of  litigation. 
This  increase  might  be  borne  by  the  injured  laboring  man, 
or  his  widow  and  dependent  children,  at  the  present  time,  but 
I  seriously  doubt  their  ability  to  bear  it  when  wages  are 
reduced  after  the  war. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  24,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1208-1&Q5 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  24, 1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval.  Senate  Bill  No,  65,  entitled: 


'92  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"An  Act  to  repeal  Section  5728  of  an  Act  of  the 
Sixty-second  General  Assembly  in  Extraordinary  Session 
approved  April  29,  1944  appearing  at  pages  45  to  48, 
inclusive,  of  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1944,  Extraordinary 
Session,  relating  to  the  annual  license  fees  on  motor 
carriers  for  the  transportation,  of  persons  and  property 
by  motor  vehicle  and  enacting  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  sec- 
tion to  be  known  as  Section  5728  relating  to  the  same 
subject  matter." 

Senate  Bill  No.  65  repeals  Section  5728  of  an  act  of  the 
62nd  General  Assembly,  Extraordinary  Session,  1944,  Laws  of 
Missouri,  Extra  Session,  1944,  page  45. 

The  principal  changes  sought  to  be  effected  by  Senate 
Bill  No.  65  are  the  the  elimination  of  fees  for  alternate  vehicles, 
the  elimination  of  the  present  provisions  requiring  the  license 
issued  by  the  Public  Service  Commission  for  a  specific  vehicle 
and  in  lieu  thereof  issuing  the  license  to  the  motor  carrier, 
and  changing  the  method  of  determining  the  amount  of  the 
license  fee  for  vehicles  used  as  common  carriers  of  freight. 

Under  the  provisions  of  the  act  passed  by  the  62nd  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  Regular  Session,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1943,  page  864,  there  was  this  provision: 

"Section  5728,  subsection,  (e).  The  annual  license  fee 
required  by  this  article  is  intended  to  cover  only  the 
motor  vehicle  for  which  it  is  issued  and  none  other; 


At  the  time  this  act  was  passed  the  Public  Service  Commission 
had  a  rule  or  regulation  in  effect  whereby  the  motor  carrier 
•could  use  at  least  two  alternate  vehicles  upon  the  payment 
of  a  certain  fee.  The  1943  act  conflicted  with  this  rule  of  the 
Commission  because  the  act  limited  the  license  fee  to  the 
particular  vehicle  and  none  other.  At  the  Extraordinary 
Session  of  the  General  Assembly  in  1944  am  act  was  passed 
amending  the  1943  act.  This  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1944,  Extraordinary  Session,  pages  45  to  48,  inclusive.  In 
-subsection  (e)  of  the  1944  act  provision  was  made  permitting 
a  carrier  to  describe  on  his  annual  license  card  not  more  than 
two  emergency  vehicles  of  weight  carrying  capacity  not 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  93 

greater  than  that  of  the  regularly  licensed  vehicle  upon  the 
payment  of  an  annual  fee  of  $5.00  for  each  alternate  vehicle 
described  on  said  annual  license  card.  There  also  was  written 
into  this  section  the  following  sentence:  "Only  one  of  such 
three  vehicles  as  shown  on  the  annual  license  card  may  be 
operated  in  the  State  at  any  one  time."  There  is  no  question 
but  that  the  fees  charged  for  alternate  or  emergency  vehicles 
will  be  eliminated  under  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  65, 
and  a  drastic  reduction  in  the  fees  of  travel  orders. 

Under  the  provisions  of  subsection  (e),  page  4,  line  97 
of  Senate  Bill  No.  65  (the  Truly  Agreed  To  and  Finally  Passed 
bill),  the  license  or  permit  card  required  of  a  motor  carrier 
is  intended  to  cover  any  vehicle  operated  by  such  motor  car- 
rier having  a  seating  or  weight  carrying  capacity  not  greater 
than  that  described  by  the  permit  card.  This  provision  will 
make  it  impossible  to  enforce  the  provision  found  in  sub- 
section (a),  page  3,  lines  41  to  45,  inclusive,  which  is  as  follows: 
"In  case  of  emergency  or  usual  temporary  demand  for  trans- 
portation, the  license  fee  on  additional  motor  vehicles  for 
limited  periods  shall  be  fixed  by  the  commission  in  such 
reasonable  amount  as  may  be  prescribed  by  general  or  tem- 
porary order." 

With  the  license  or  permit  card  permitted  to  be  used  on 
any  vehicle  of  similar  capacity  the  Commission  would  be  un- 
able to  enforce  the  collection  of  any  fee  it  might  fix  for  the 
use  of  an  emergency  or  temporary  vehicle.  There  would  be 
no  way  of  determining  whether  the  vehicle  in  use  was  the 
regular  one  or  an  emergency  vehicle.  It  is  difficult  to  esti- 
mate the  amount  of  revenue  that  the  State  would  lose  by  this 
elimination  of  fees  for  the  benefit  of  the  motor  carrier. 

In  addition  to  eliminating  fees  for  the  operation  of  emer- 
gency vehicles,  subsection  (e)  of  Senate  Bill  No.  65,  by  author- 
izing the  use  of  the  license  or  permit  to  cover  any  vehicle  of 
similar  capacity  operated  by  the  carrier,  does  away  with  the 
necessity  of  identifying  the  vehicle  for  which  the  license  is 
issued  and  any  requirement  that  a  license  should  be  required 
for  a  special  vehicle,  as  seems  to  be  contemplated  under  the 
provisions  of  subsection  (e)  of  the  existing  law. 

Subsection  (e)  is  also  ambiguous  in  that  it  fails  to  make 
clear  whether  it  is  the  intention  of  the  General  Assembly  to 


94  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

authorize  the  use  of  one  license  or  permit  to  cover  the  opera- 
tion of  several  vehicles  of  similar  capacity  at  the  same  time, 
or  to  restrict  the  use  of  one  license  or  permit  card  to  one 
vehicle  at  one  time. 

With  the  General  Assembly  specifically  saying  the  license 
card  or  permit  card  is  intended  to  cover  any  vehicle  of  similar 
capacity  operated  by  the  carrier  the  conclusion  might  be 
reached  that  several  vehicles  of  similar  capacity  could  be 
operated  at  the  same  time  under  one  license  or  permit  card. 
This  is  especially  true  in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  sentence 
above  quoted,  to  wit:  "Only  one  of  such  three  vehicles  as 
shown  on  the  annual  license  card  may  be  operated  in  the 
State  at  any  one  time."  is  omitted  from  subsection  (e)  of 
Senate  Bill  No.  65.  There  is  no  question  but  that  the  present 
law  limits  the  use  of  the  license  or  permit  card  to  one  vehicle 
at  one  time. 

The  portion  of  the  next  sentence  of  subsection  (e)  in 
parentheses  seems  to  limit  the  use  of  the  license  or  permit 
card  to  one  vehicle  at  a  time  by  requiring  that  the  license  or 
permit  card  be  displayed  in  or  on  any  vehicle  operated  there- 
under. Up  to  the  beginning  of  the  parentheses  there  is  noth- 
ing in  subsection  (e)  to  indicate  that  several  vehicles  of  similar 
capacity  might  not  be  operated  under  one  license  or  permit 
card  at  one  time.  No  identification  of  the  vehicle  is  required 
and  if  it  is  possible  to  secure  duplicate  permit  cards  a  carrier 
inclined  to  evade  the  law  could  operate  as  many  vehicles  at 
the  same  time  as  duplicate  permit  cards  could  be  procured  for. 

Subsection  (e)  is  [in?]  regard  to  the  ambiguity  and  the 
possibility  to  evade  the  law  is  an  unsatisfactory  subsection. 

The  next  question  is  the  change  in  the  method  of  deter- 
mining the  license. 

Under  the  existing  law  the  amount  of  the  license  fee  is 
determined  by  the  manufacturer's  rated  load  capacity  or  the 
actual  weight  carrying  capacity  of  the  vehicle.  By  the  pro- 
visions of  subsection  (c)  of  Senate  Bill  No.  65  the  amount  of 
the  license  is  to  be  determined  by  the  "actual  pay  load  or 
weight  carried/'  Under  subsection  (c)  of  the  1944  act  the 
Public  Service  Commission  is  authorized  to  determine  the 
weight  carrying  capacity  of  the  vehicle.  Senate  Bill  No*  05 
does  not  authorize  the  Commission  to  determine  the  "actual 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  95 

pay  load  or  weight  carried,"  nor  are  these  words  defined  at 
any  place  in  the  bill.  This  puts  the  Commission  in  the  posi- 
tion of  having  to  collect  a  license  fee  upon  an  undefined  basis, 
and  requires  a  consideration  of  these  words  "actual  pay  load 
or  weight  carried"  in  an  attempt  to  determine  their  mean- 
ing and  how  the  Commission  would  apply  the  meaning  of 
them  in  collecting  the  license  fee.  The  words  have  no  tech- 
nical meaning  and  should  be  taken  in  their  usual  and  ordinary 
meaning.  Applying  this  test  the  words  "actual  pay  load" 
means  the  quantity  of  freight  transported  for  which  the  fixed 
schedule  of  tariff  has  been  collected  or  will  be  collected;  and 
the  words  "weight  carried"  means  the  amount  of  freight 
which  has  been  transported,  measured  in  pounds,  hundred- 
weight or  tons.  Using  these  meanings  for  the  words  which 
give  the  method  by  which  the  Commission  is  to  determine 
the  fee  it  is  obvious  that  the  Commission  could  never  deter- 
mine the  amount  of  the  license  fee  for  a  vehicle.  The  Com- 
mission could  not  know  the  actual  pay  load  of  a  vehicle  or 
how  much  weight  it  had  carried  in  order  to  collect  a  fee  in 
advance  for  the  operation  of  the  vehicle  as  a  motor  carrier. 
Such  a  situation  would  be  absurd,  unreasonable,  and  the  law 
inoperative. 

This  bill  does  not  prescribe  a  method  for  the  Commission 
to  determine  the  amount  of  license  to  be  charged.  In  this 
situation  the  only  alternative  is  that  the  Commission  would 
be  required  to  accept  the  statement  of  the  motor  carrier  as 
to  the  capacity  of  the  vehicle  as  to  the  amount  of  the  "actual 
pay  load"  it  could  transport  "or  the  amount  of  weight"  it 
could  carry.  This  would  result  in  a  situation  rendering  the 
statute  unenforceable  because  of  the  failure  to  provide  a 
method  for  the  Commission  to  use  in  determining  the  capacity 
of  the  vehicle,  to  define  the  meaning  of  the  words,  and  to 
authorize  the  Commission  to  make  the  determination. 

In  conclusion  it  is  my  opinion  that  subsection  (c)  of 
Senate  Bill  No*  65  is  unenforceable  and  invalid;  that  sub- 
section  (e)  is  ambiguous  and  indefinite. 

There  is  no  question  but  what  the  revenue  of  the  State 
would  be  reduced  under  the  provisions  of  this  bill  and  in 


96  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

view  of  the  ambiguous  and  indefinite  provisions  of  this  bill 
it  is  my  opinion  that  it  should  not  become  a  law. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  2,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1210-1217 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  QTY, 
August  2,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113, 
entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Granting  and  ceding  to  the  United  States  exclusive 
jurisdiction  over  certain  lands  and  improvements  thereon 
located  in  the  State  of  Missouri,  for  the  purpose  of  estab- 
lishing, creating,  erecting  and  maintaining  a  United 
States  Veterans'  Facility  for  veterans  of  all  wars,  and 
authorizing  the  governor  of  Missouri  to  make,  execute 
and  deliver  proper  deeds  of  conveyance  to  such  lauds  for 
the  consideration  of  one  dollar,  and  upom  delivery  of  the 
proper  deeds  of  conveyance,  to  cede  to  the  United  States 
exclusive  jurisdiction  over  such  lands  saving  and  reserv- 
ing to  the  State  of  Missouri  the  right  of  taxation,  and 
further  saving  and  reserving  to  the  State  of  Missouri 
the  right  to  serve  thereon  any  civil  or  criminal  process 
issued  under  the  authority  of  the  State,  and  fixing  the 
conditions  under  which  such  jurisdiction  shall  terminate, 
with  an  emergency  clause." 


GOVEBNOB  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  97 

Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  and  Senate 
Bill  No.  157  are  companion  bills  and  will  be  discussed  together. 

Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  gives  the 
consent  of  the  State  of  Missouri  to  the  United  States  for  the 
acquisition  of  certain  lands  and  improvements  thereon,  and 
empowers,  authorizes,  and  directs  the  Governor  to  make, 
execute,  and  deliver  proper  deeds  of  conveyance  of  such  lands 
and  improvements  to  the  United  States  for  the  consideration 
of  $1.00  when  application  is  made  to  the  Governor  for  the 
purpose  provided  in  the  act;  and  further  provides  that  delivery 
of  proper  deeds  shall  cede  to  the  United  States  jurisdiction 
over  the  lands  in  question  for  the  purpose  of  establishing, 
creating,  erecting,  and  maintaining  a  United  States  Veterans' 
Facility  for  the  veterans  of  all  wars.  The  land  in  question 
is  the  land  conveyed  to  the  State  of  Missouri  by  the  Con- 
federate Home  of  Missouri,  a  corporation  organized  under 
the  provisions  of  Article  10,  Chapter  21,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1879,  pursuant  to  an  act  of  the  legislature  found 
in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1897,  page  26.  Said  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  gives  exclusive  jurisdiction  over 
the  lands  so  acquired  by  the  United  States  and  attempts  to 
reserve  to  the  State  of  Missouri  the  right  of  taxation,  and 
further  reserves  to  the  State  the  right  to  serve  thereon  any 
civil  or  criminal  process.  Said  act  further  provides  that  the 
jurisdiction  so  ceded  to  the  United  States  shall  continue  no 
longer  than  the  United  States  shall  own  such  lands  and  use 
the  same  for  the  purposes  for  which  they  were  acquired. 
However,  the  act  does  not  provide,  nor  require  the  deed  in 
question  to  do  so,  that  the  lands  will  revert  to  the  State  of 
Missouri  if  the  United  States  fails  to  use  the  lands  for  the 
purposes  for  which  they  were  acquired.  The  act  also  contains 
a  purported  emergency  clause. 

Senate  Bill  No.  157  authorizes  the  Board  of  Managers  of 
the  State  Eleemosynary  Institutions  to  rent  or  lease  suitable 
quarters  situated  in  or  near  Higginsville,  Missouri,  to  house 
and  care  for  any  and  all  Confederate  veterans  and  the  aged 
and  infirm  wives  and  widows  of  said  veterans  now  resident 
in  the  Confederate  Home  at  Higginsville,  Missouri.  (Under- 
scoring mine.)  This  act  does  not  authorize  said  Board  of 
Managers  to  rent  or  lease  suitable  quarters  for  any  other  ex- 


98  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Confederate  soldiers  and  sailors,  their  wives,  widows,  and 
orphans  as  provided  for  in  the  original  act  creating  the  Con- 
federate Home  as  a  State  institution.  Said  act  also  omits 
the  orphans  of  the  ex-Confederate  soldiers  and  sailors.  Said 
act  has  an  emergency  clause  which  provides  in  part  that 

"Since  there  is  a  need  for  the  establishment  of  a  suitable 
home  in  or  near  Higginsville,  Missouri,  for  the  care  and 
maintenance  of  such  Confederate  veterans  and  the  aged 
and  infirm  wives  and  widows  of  said  veterans  now  resi- 
dent at  the  Confederate  Home." 

A  brief  history  of  the  Confederate  Home  is  necessary  to 
understand  the  effects  of  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  113  and  Senate  Bill  No.  157.  The  Confederate  Home 
was  originally  owned  and  operated  by  a  corporation  organized 
as  a  benevolent  corporation  under  the  provisions  of  Article 
10,  Chapter  21,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1879.  The 
legislature  in  1897  passed  an  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1897,  pages  26  to  28,  inclusive,  approved  March  1,  1897, 
declaring  in,  Section  1  of  said  act,  the  institution  known  as 
the  Confederate  Home  situated  near  Higginsville  in  Lafayette 
County,  Missouri,  to  be  an  eleemosynary  institution,  of  the 
State  of  Missouri,  in  which  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Con- 
federate soldiers  and  sailors,  their  wives,  widows,  and  orphans 
may  be  maintained  and  cared  for. 

By  Section  2  of  said  act  the  State  of  Missouri  assumed  the 
maintenance  and  support  of  said  Confederate  Home  for  the 
term  of  twenty  years,  or  so  long  as  it  shall  be  needed  for  the 
purpose  of  Section  1.  (Underscoring  mine.)  It  further  pro- 
vided, that  in  consideration  of  this  action  upon  the  part  of 
the  State,  the  present  executive  committee  of  said  Confed- 
erate Home  shall  convey  to  the  State  of  Missouri  all  property 
of  said  Confederate  Home  now  owned  and  held  by  it,  con- 
sisting of  362.86  acres  of  land  more  or  less  near  Higgins- 
ville, Lafayette  County,  Missouri,  except  2,86  acres  for  a 
cemetery  lot,  together  with  all  improvements  thereon,  and  all 
personal  property  at  said  Home.  Said  act  further  provided 
that  the  deed,  after  being  duly  recorded  shall  be  deposited 
with  the  Secretary  of  State.  The  control  and  management 
was  vested  by  said  act  in  a  Board  of  Managers, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  99 

Pursuant  to  said  act  the  corporation,  the  Confederate 
Home  of  Missouri,  through  its  officers,  conveyed  to  the  State 
of  Missouri  the  land  in  question  by  deed  on  the  16th  day  of 
March,  1897.  Said  deed  provided  in  part  that  the  officers  of 
said  Home 

"do  hereby  pursuant  to  an  act  of  the  legislature  of  Mis- 
souri approved  March  1,  1897,  and  in  consideration  of 
the  assumption  of  the  State  of  Missouri  of  the  mainte- 
nance and  support  of  said  Confederate  Home  for  the  term 
of  twenty  years  or  so  long  as  it  shall  be  needed  for  the 
maintenance  and  care  of  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Con- 
federate soldiers  and  sailors,  their  wives,  widows  and 
orphans,  all  as  contemplated  and  provided  in  the  afore- 
said act  of  the  legislature  of  Missouri,  approved  March 
1,  1897,  convey,  grant,  bargain  and  sell  in  fee  simple 
forever  unto  the  State  of  Missouri,  the  following  described 
tracts  or  parcels  of  land  situate  in  Lafayette  County, 
State  of  Missouri,  near  the  town  of  Higginsville,  Mis- 
souri, known  as  the  Confederate  Home  of  Missouri, 
to-wit:" 

(The  362.68  acres  of  land  is  described  by  metes  and  bounds, 
except  2,68  acres  to  be  used  as  a  cemetery  lot.)  This  being 
the  same  land  described  in  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  113. 

Said  Act  of  1897  has  been  amended  from  time  to  time 
and  Section  2  thereof  has  not  been  carried  forward  in  the 
later  revisions  of  the  statutes;  however,  it  has  never  been 
repealed  and,  in,  my  opinion,  could  not  have  been  repealed. 
The  Confederate  Home,  however,  has  been  maintained  and 
supported  by  the  State  for  the  purposes  set  out  in  the  deed 
and  Act  of  1897  since  the  land  was  conveyed  to  it  pursuant 
to  said  act. 

The  Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Confederate  Home  on 
December  1,  1924,  passed  a  resolution  in  which  it  was  stated 
that  the  Board  of  Trustees  were  trustees  of  an  endowment 
funds  of  $19,000  under  the  provisions  of  the  will  of  C.  T. 
Jaquith  for  the  "use  aud  benefit  of  the  Confederate  Home," 
and  that  other  endowment  money  was  available,  and  that  it 
was  to  the  best  interests  of  the  State  that  certain  described 
land  be  set  aside  for  all  time  to  come  as  a  Memorial  Park. 


100  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Said  resolution,  petitioned  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  Mis- 
souri and  the  Governor  to  approve  said  designation  of  the 
lands  for  that  purpose,  and  that  the  legislature  be  requested 
to  approve  and  agree  to  accept  for  permanent  maintenance 
the  earnings  of  endowment  moneys  coming  into  the  hands  of 
the  Board  of  Trustees  for  the  purpose  of  permanent  mainte- 
nance of  said  part  for  all  time  to  come.  The  land  so  designated 
in  the  resolution  was  a  part  of  the  land  conveyed  to  the  State 
of  Missouri  as  aforesaid  and  accepted  by  it  under  the  Act  of 
1897.  The  part  so  designated  for  a  Memorial  Park  being 
approximately  92  acres. 

The  legislature  in  1925,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1925,  page  136, 
authorized  the  Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Confederate  Home 
to  accept  gifts,  donations,  and  bequests,  including  gifts,  dona- 
tions, or  bequests  already  given,  offered  or  provided  for,  from 
any  private  source  or  sources  not  exceeding  in  the  aggregate 
$75,000,  the  same  to  be  set  apart  and  maintained  as  a  per- 
manent endowment  for  the  maintenance  of  the  grounds  there- 
after described.  Said  act  further  provided  that  the  Board  of 
Trustees  was  empowered  and  authorized  to  invest  the  moneys 
so  derived  and  use  the  income  therefrom  for  the  maintenance 
of  said  grounds,  but  the  principal  thereof  should  remain  intact 
as  a  permanent  endowment  fund.  Said  act  further  provided 
that  in  consideration  of  the  bestowal  of  any  such  gifts,  dona- 
tions, or  bequests  for  the  purposes  above  mentioned,  cer- 
tain described  lands,  which  were  a  part  of  the  land  used  by 
the  Confederate  Home  shall  be  and  are  hereby  set  apart  as 
a  permanent  Memorial  Park  to  the  valor  of  Confederate 
soldiers.  (Said  land  being  approximately  92  acres  and  de- 
scribed in  Section  15135,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  19390 

Certain  gifts  and  donations  have  been  received  by  the 
Board  from  time  to  time,  and  at  one  time  members  of  the 
Daughters  of  the  Confederacy  were  assessed  for  the  purpose 
of  building  up  said  endowment  fund. 

Pursuant  to  said  Act  of  1925  the  land  described  therein 
was  dedicated  as  a  park,  and  the  income  from  the  endowment 
fund  has  been  used  for  the  maintenance  of  said  grounds  as 
a  permanent  Memorial  Park  to  the  valor  of  Confederate 
soldiers.  The  General  Assembly  in  1943,  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1943,  pages  953  to  955,  inclusive,  provided  that  the  Board 
of  Trustees  of  the  Confederate  Home  should  be  abolished  and 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  101 

the  control  and  management  of  said  Home  be  transferred  to 
the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary  Institu- 
tions. Said  act  further  provided  that  the  Board  of  Managers 
of  the  State  Eleemosynary  Institutions,  shall  continue  to 
maintain  the  Confederate  Home  and  Memorial  Park  at 
Higginsville,  Missouri,  for  the  purpose  for  which  it  was  estab- 
lished so  long  as  it  shall  be  needed  for  the  maintenance  and 
care  of  the  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Confederate  soldiers  and 
sailors,  their  wives,  widows,  and  orphans.  Said  Act  of  1943 
made  said  Board  of  Managers  the  custodian  of  any  endow- 
ment funds,  to  be  set  apart  and  maintained  as  a  permanent 
endowment  for  the  maintenance  of  the  grounds  described  in 
Section  15135,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which 
grounds  were  those  designated  as  a  permanent  Memorial  Park. 

Said  Act  of  1943  further  provides  that  it  shall  be  the 
duty  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary 
Institutions  to  designate  one  suitable  building,  closely  asso- 
ciated with  the  care  of  the  Confederate  veterans  and  their 
survivors  as  a  memorial  building,  in  addition  to  the  Memorial 
Park,  upon  which  shall  be  placed  a  suitable  plaque  and  to 
select  and  purchase  a  suitable  commemorative  stone  to  be 
erected  upon  the  grounds  of  the  Memorial  Park,  which  plaque, 
park,  and  monument  shall  stand  as  a  perpetual  memorial 
to  the  valor  of  those  who  served  the  Confederacy  in  the  War 
between  the  States. 

Said  Act  of  1943  further  provides  that  the  Board  of 
Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary  Institutions  shall  have 
full  power  IB  its  discretion  to  transfer  to  said  Home  any 
aged,  infirm  person  who  now  is  or  hereafter  may  be  properly 
within  its  jurisdiction  as  an  inmate  of  any  State  Hospital; 
provided,  that  said  transfer  shall  not  interfere  with  the  pur- 
pose for  which  said  Home  was  established. 

From  the  above  it  is  plain  that  the  Confederate  Home  of 
Missouri  in  1897,  which  was  then  a  benevolent  corporation, 
conveyed  the  land  in  question  (362.68  acres)  to  the  State  of 
Missouri  in  consideration  of  the  assumption,  by  the  State  of 
Missouri  of  the  maintenance  and  support  of  said  Confederate 
Home  so  long  as  it  shall  be  needed  for  the  maintenance  and 
care  of  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Confederate  soldiers  and 
sailors,  their  wives,  widows,  and  orphans.  It  is  also  apparent 
that  the  State  of  Missouri,  by  the  Act  of  1897,  accepted  said 


102  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

lands  as  conveyed  and  assumed  the  maintenance  and  support 
of  said  Confederate  Home  so  long  as  it  was  needed  to  care 
for  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Confederate  soldiers  and  sailors, 
their  wives,  widows,  and  orphans. 

In  my  opinion,  there  is  no  question  that  the  entire  trans- 
action between  the  original  grantors  and  the  State  of  Missouri 
constituted  a  valid  contract  between  the  corporation  and  the 
State  of  Missouri  and  that  both  parties  are  legally  and  morally 
bound  by  the  terms  thereof.  (Franklin  vs.  Moss  101  S.  W. 
(2nd)  711  1.  c.  714.) 

Ordinarily  a  law  enacted  by  one  legislature  may  be  re- 
pealed by  a  succeeding  legislature;  however,  there  are  excep- 
tions to  this  rule.  Section  13  of  Article  I  of  the  Constitution 
of  Missouri  of  1945  provides 

"That  no  ex  post  facto  law,  nor  law  impairing  the  obliga- 
tion of  contracts,  or  retrospective  in  its  operation,  or 
making  •  any  irrevocable  grant  of  special  privileges  or 
immunities,  can  be  enacted." 

If  Senate  Bill  No.  157  and  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  113  impair  the  obligation  of  the  State  of  Mis- 
souri to  maintain  the  Confederate  Home  so  long  as  it  shall 
be  needed  for  the  maintenance  and  care  of  infirm  and  depend- 
ent ex-Confederate  soldiers  and  sailors,  their  wives,  widows, 
and  orphans,  they  would,  in  my  opinion,  be  in  violation  of 
Section  13  of  Article  I  of  the  Missouri  Constitution.  That 
they  do  this  is  apparent  from  the  wording  of  said  acts  and 
particularly  Section  4  of  Senate  Bill  No.  157,  which  provides 
as  follows: 

"Since  there  is  a  need  for  the  establishment  of  a  suitable 
home  in  or  near  Higginsville,  Missouri,  for  the  care  and 
maintenance  of  such  Confederate  veterans  and  the  aged 
and  infirm  wives  and  widows  of  said  veterans  now  resi- 
dent at  the  Confederate  Home,  an  emergency  exists 
within  the  meaning  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri,  and 
this  act  shall  be  in  full  force  and  effect  from  and  after  its 
passage  and  approval." 

As  pointed  out  above,  this  act  does  not  even  attempt  to 
provide  for  any  other  qualified  persons  than  those  now  rest- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  103 

dent  at  the  Confederate  Home.  (Underscoring  mine.)  As  shown 
above,  the  legislature  in  1925  authorized  and  empowered  the 
Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Confederate  Home  to  accept  gifts, 
donations,  and  bequests  from  any  private  source  or  sources 
to  be  set  apart  and  maintained  as  a  permanent  endowment 
for  the  maintenance  of  the  grounds  thereafter  described  as  a 
permanent  Memorial  Park  to  the  valor  of  Confederate  soldiers. 
By  said  act  the  legislature  in  consideration  of  any  such  gifts, 
•donations,  or  bequests  set  apart  certain  designated  lands  as 
.a  permanent  Memorial  Park.  Bequests,  gifts,  and  donations 
have  been  solicitied  and  accepted  for  the  maintenance  of  said 
Park  and  at  the  present  time  said  endowment  fund  amounts 
to  approximately  $25,000.00.  I  believe  that  the  acceptance 
of  such  gifts,  donations,  or  bequests  under  the  terms  of  said 
act  would  create  a  valid  contract  between  the  donors  and  the 
State  of  Missouri,  and  the  failure  of  the  State  of  Missouri  to 
maintain  the  permanent  Memorial  Park  in  question  as  pro- 
vided in  said  act  would  constitute  a  breach  of  its  obligation 
to  persons  who  had  been  induced  to  make  gifts,  donations, 
and  bequests.  An  act  of  the  legislature  attempting  to  deed 
or  cede  lands  set  apart  as  a  permanent  Memorial  Park  would 
be  an  act  impairing  the  obligation  of  the  State  and,  to  say 
the  least,  would  be  a  breach  of  trust  on  the  part  of  the  State. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  113  authorizing  the  Governor  to  convey  and  ceding 
to  the  United  States  certain,  lands  now  used  for  the  care  and 
maintenance  of  infirm  and  dependent  ex-Confederate  soldiers 
and  sailors,  their  wives,  widows,  and  orphans  and  for  a  per- 
manent Memorial  Park  to  the  valor  of  Confederate  soldiers 
is  a  breach  of  the  State's  contractual  obligations,  in  violation 
of  Section  13  of  Article  I  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri  and 
is  therefore  unconstitutional  and  void. 

Said  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  is, 
in  my  opinion,  further  unconstitutional  for  the  reason  that  it 
attempts  to  reserve  to  the  State  of  Missouri  the  right  of  taxa- 
tion to  the  same  extent  and  in  the  same  manner  as  if  the 
land  in  question  was  not  ceded  to  the  United  States.  Section  43 
of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri  provides  in  part 

".    *    *    No  tax  shall  be  imposed  on  lands  the  property 
of  the  United  States;    ,    ,    *    *" 


104  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  addition  to  the  unconstitutionally  of  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  I  think  there  is  another  reason 
why  said  act  should  be  voted  [vetoed]. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  1,  Fulton,  there  are  2515  inmates. 
If  they  had  the  facilities,  personnel,  and  funds  at  this  insti- 
tution they  could  accommodate  2982  patients.  There  is  an 
over-crowding  of  elderly  patients.  At  the  present  time  there 
are  26  on  the  waiting  list. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  2,  St.  Joseph,  they  have  2666 
inmates.  The  normal  capacity  of  this  institution  is  approxi- 
mately 2020  inmates.  They  have  approximately  650  in  excess 
of  their  normal  capacity.  They  have  29  on  their  waiting  list 
in  addition  to  several  that  have  been  accepted  but  have  not 
been  delivered  to  the  institution.  The  principal  over-crowd- 
ing at  this  institution  is  in  the  aged  group. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  3,  Nevada,  they  have  2128  inmates 
and  their  normal  capacity  is  approximately  1530.  They  also 
have  approximately  35  on  their  waiting  list. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  4,  Farmington,  they  have  1830 
inmates,  the  normal  capacity  of  this  hospital  is  1600.  They 
have  on  file  243  requests  for  admission  to  the  institution. 
They  are  unable  to  admit  these  people  because  of  the  over- 
crowded condition  of  the  institution. 

At  the  Missouri  State  School  at  Marshall  they  have  1738 
patients  enrolled  and  while  they  have  some  beds  unoccupied 
this  is  approximately  their  capacity.  Some  of  their  wards  are 
slightly  over-crowded  due  to  classification;  however,  this  insti- 
tution has  850  applicants  on  their  waiting  list. 

The  above  information  demonstrates  the  over-crowded 
conditions  at  our  eleemosynary  institutions. 

The  Confederate  Home  at  Higginsville  consists  of  the 
following  buildings  and  property: 

Administration  Building,  two  story  brick,  six  bed- 
rooms upstairs  and  four  rooms  and  a  hall  downstairs. 

Men's  dormitory  and  hospital,  two  atory  brick  build- 
ing (main  building  with  an  ell)  with  seven  large  rooms 
and  a  large  dormitory  upstairs,  seven  rooms  and  a  din- 
ing room  and  kitchen  on  the  main  floor,  also  a  basement* 
This  building  will  easily  accommodate  300  people. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  105 

Hospital  building,  two  story  brick,  seven  rooms  up- 
stairs, the  downstairs  can  be  made  into  wards  and  rooms 
and  accommodate  approximately  thirty  people. 

Women's  dormitory  and  hospital,  two  story  brick 
building,  twelve  rooms  upstairs  and  nine  rooms  down- 
stairs, with  kitchen  and  dining  room. 

Office  and  commissary  building,  one  story  brick. 

With  the  exception  of  one  building,  which  was  slightly 
damaged  by  fire,  all  of  the  above  brick  buildings  are  in 
fairly  good  condition  and  with  the  expenditure  of  a  rea- 
sonable amount  of  money  could  be  used  very  nicely. 

One  two  story  frame  building,  used  by  the  Superin- 
tendent. 

Seventeen  (17)  frame  residence  buildings.  The  roofs 
on  these  buildings  are  all  in  good  condition  and  the  build- 
ings are  in  fairly  good  repair.  A  number  of  these  frame 
buildings  are  four  and  five  room  houses. 

One  church  building. 

A  number  of  the  brick  buildings  have  several  hundred 
dollars  worth  of  furnishings  in  the  unoccupied  rooms. 

There  is  also  a  power  plant,  dairy  barn,  garage, 
green  house,  and  other  small  buildings  on  the  premises. 

There  is  a  herd  of  cattle,  other  livestock,  and  con- 
siderable farm  equipment. 

A  special  committee  of  the  House  of  Representatives  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  made  a  report  on  the  condition 
of  the  property  at  the  Confederate  Home  at  Higginsville  and 
its  report  will  be  found  in  the  House  Journal  of  March  21, 
1945,  at  page  443. 

In  my  opinion,  the  facilities  of  the  Confederate  Home, 
which  are  not  needed  for  the  maintenance  and  care  of  infirm 
and  dependent  ex-Confederate  soldiers  and  sailors,  their  wives, 
widows,  and  orphans,  are  needed  and  could  be  used  for  the 
oare  of  the  overflow  of  patients  in  the  various  State  Hospitals. 
In  fact,  many  harmless,  aged,  infirm  persons  now  inmates  in 
the  State  Hospitals  could  undoubtedly  be  better  cared  for  in 
these  buildings  at  the  Confederate  Home  than  in  the  present 
hospitals  where  they  are  now  confined.  If  this  were  done, 
more  persons  who  are  mentally  afflicted  could  be  cared  for 
at  the  State  Hospitals. 


106  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

As  above  stated,  under  the  provisions  of  the  Act  of  1943, 
the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary  Institu- 
tions now  have  full  power  and  authority  to  transfer  to  the 
Confederate  Home  any  aged,  infirm  person  who  is  an  inmate 
of  any  State  Hospital.  By  the  expenditure  of  a  reasonable 
sum  of  money  the  buildings  at  the  Confederate  Home  could 
be  put  in  condition  to  take  care  of  several  hundred  of  the 
patients  at  the  four  State  Hospitals  and  thereby  greatly  relieve 
the  over-crowded  condition  at  these  hospitals. 

I  respectfully  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  give 
serious  consideration  to  the  passage  of  an  appropriation  suffi- 
cient to  put  these  buildings  in  condition  and  equip  them  for 
the  above  purpose. 

Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113  empowers, 
authorizes,  and  directs  the  Governor  to  make,  execute,  and 
deliver  deeds  of  conveyance  of  the  Confederate  Home  property, 
and  improvements  thereon,  to  the  United  States  for  the  con- 
sideration of  $1.00. 

As  above  stated  the  Confederate  Home  is  an  eleemosy- 
nary institution  and  under  the  provisions  of  Section  9272,, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  the  title  of  all  real  estate, 
or  personal  property  now  owned  by  the  eleemosynary  insti- 
tutions, or  by  the  State  for  their  use,  is  vested  in  the  Board 
of  Managers  of  the  Eleemosynary  Institutions  for  the  use  and 
benefit  of  said  institutions. 

While  I  believe  that  the  General  Assembly  has  the  author- 
ity to  authorize  the  sale  of  any  real  estate  owned  by  any  of 
the  eleemosynary  institutions,  yet,  there  is  a  serious  question 
in  my  mind  as  to  whether  the  Governor  has  the  authority  to 
execute  a  deed  for  the  conveyance  of  land  owned  by  an  elee- 
mosynary institution  when  the  title  to  the  land  is  vested  by 
statute  in  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Eleemosynary 
Institutions. 

But  whether  or  not  the  Governor  has  the  authority  to 
execute  a  deed  conveying  the  Confederate  Home  property  to 
the  United  States  government  for  the  consideration  of  $LQO, 
I  do  not  want  to  be  a  party  to  giving  away  all  of  the  build- 
ings and  property  which  constitute  the  Confederate  Home 
when  I  believe  that  these  buildings  and  property  can  be 
repaired,  equipped,  and  used  to  advantage  by  the  State  for 
the  purposes  above  indicated. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  107 

No  provision  is  made  in  either  of  these  bills,  if  they  should 
become  the  law,  for  the  disposition  of  the  endowment  fund 
of  $25,000.00  or  any  other  personal  property  at  said  institution. 

For  the  reasons  hereinabove  set  forth,  I  do  not  believe 
that  these  bills  should  be  approved  and  are  therefore  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  2,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1217 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  OTY, 
August  2,  1945, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  157,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Authorizing  the  board  of  managers  of  the  state 
eleemosynary  institutions  to  rent  or  lease  a  suitable  prop- 
erty in  or  near  Higginsville,  Missouri,  to  house,  care  for 
and  maintain,  such  Confederate  veterans  and  the  aged 
and  infirm  wives  and  widows  of  said  veterans  now  resi- 
dent in  the  Confederate  Home,  and  providing  powers 
and  duties  of  said  board  in  regard  to  the  control  and 
maintenance  of  said  home,  and  for  the  admission  and 
transfer  of  certain  persons  from  the  Confederate  Home 
to  said  home;  with  an  emergency  clause." 


108  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  I  vetoed  Committee  Substitute 
for  Senate  Bill  No.  113,  Senate  Bill  No.  157  is  also  vetoed. 
My  reasons  for  vetoing  this  bill  are  set  forth  in  the  message 
attached  to  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  113, 
dated  August  2,  1945. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  3,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1217-1220 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  3,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 

Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  126,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  13387,  13388,  13392,  13393, 
13394  and  13395,  of  Article  1,  all  in  Chapter  99;  and 
Section  9179,  of  Article  9,  in  Chapter  48;  and  Sections 
2065  and  2073,  of  Article  2,  in  Chapter  10;  and  Section 
2214  of  Article  4,  in  Chapter  10;  and  Section  2286,  of 
Article  5,  in  Chapter  10;  and  Section  2311,  of  Article  6, 
in  Chapter  10,  all  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,, 
all  relating  to  the  salaries  and  expenses  of  Judges  of  the 
Supreme  Court,  the  Courts  of  Appeals,  Circuit  Courts, 
the  St.  Louis  Court  of  Criminal  Correction,  and  the  Cape 
Girardeau  Court  of  Common  Pleas;  and  enacting  three 
new  sections  in  lieu  thereof,  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter  of  the  salaries  and  expenses  of  such  Judges;  pro- 
viding that  the  salaries  and  expenses  herein  provided  shall 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  109 

constitute  the  total  salaries  and  expenses  of  said  Judges, 
that  said  Judges  shall  receive  no  other  salaries,  expenses, 
or  compensation  for  any  duties  required  to  be  performed 
by  them  under  the  law,  repealing  all  other  conflicting 
laws." 

A  protest  was  filed  with  Senate  Bill  No.  126  under  the 
provisions  of  Section  30,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of 
Missouri,  1945.  One  of  the  reasons  alleged  in  said  protest 
was  that  the  compensation  of  the  judges  of  the  Supreme 
Court  and  the  other  judges  included  in  the  bill  was  in  direct 
contravention  of  Section  13,  Article  VII  of  the  Constitution 
of  Missouri,  1945,  which  provides: 

"The  compensation  of  state,  county  and  municipal  officers 
shall  not  be  increased  during  the  term  of  office;  .  .  .  ." 

Said  protest  also  referred  to  Section  24  of  Article  V  of 
the  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1945,  which  provides: 

"All  judges  shall  receive  as  salary  the  total  amount  of 
their  present  compensation  until  otherwise  provided  by 
law,  but  no  judge's  salary  shall  be  diminished  during  his 
term  of  office " 

I  do  not  believe  there  is  any  conflict  between  these  two 
provisions  of  the  Constitution.  Article  VII  deals  with  public 
officers  and  Section  13  thereof  refers  to  State,  county  and 
municipal  officers.  While  I  consider  a  judge  a  State  officer 
yet  this  section  is  general  in  its  terms. 

Article  V  deals  exclusively  with  the  judges.  I  believe 
Section  24  thereof  is  specific  in  its  application  and,  therefore, 
the  provisions  of  Section,  24  of  Article  V  would  govern  over 
the  provisions  of  Section  13  of  Article  VII  because  they  are 
specific.  Said  Section  24  of  Article  V  says  that  no  judge's 
salary  shall  be  diminished  during  his  term  of  office.  It  does 
not  say  that  it  shall  not  be  increased. 

There  being  no  conflict  between  these  two  provisions  of 
the  Constitution,  I  believe  that  the  General  Assembly  has  the 
authority  to  increase  the  salaries  of  the  judges  during  their 
term  of  office* 


110  -MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

With  reference  to  the  merits  of  the  bill,  I  believe  that  this 
bill  is  too  broad  in  its  scope  and  undertakes  too  many  in- 
creases in  salary  at  one  time.  Some  of  the  increases  are  too 
high  and  unjustified.  I  do  not  believe  that  the  salary  increases 
of  the  judges  of  all  the  courts  of  the  State  should  be  included 
in  one  bill. „  The  Supreme  and  Appellate  Judges  could  be 
included  in  the  same  bill;  however,  the  circuit  judges  should 
be  in  a  separate  bill.  For  instance,  during  this  present  General 
Assembly  the  salary  of  the  circuit  judges  of  St.  Louis  County 
was  increased  $1500.00  per  annum  for  each  circuit  judge  in 
said  county,  making  their  salary  $8000.00  per  year.  This  was 
done  by  House  Bill  No.  78  which  was  approved.  The  bill 
passed  the  General  Assembly  as  it  was  originally  written; 
the  judges  of  St.  Louis  County  received  what  they  asked  for. 
They  were  satisfied.  Senate  Bill  No.  126  gives  them  an 
additional  increase  of  $1000.00  per  year.  I  do  not  think  it  is 
fair  to  do  this  and  that  is  one  reason  why  I  think  there  should 
be  separate  bills  so  that  a  situation  of  this  kind  may  be  taken 
care  of.  Other  instances  of  substantial  increases  in  salary  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  126  is  the  circuit  judge  in  Pettis  County.  He 
now  receives  $4700.00  per  year  and  is  increased  by  this  bill 
to  $8000.00  per  year.  There  is  only  one  county  in  this  circuit 
and,  of  course,  the  judge  is  in  his  home  county  all  the  time. 
The  judge  of  the  St.  Louis  Court  of  Criminal  Correction  is 
increased  from  $4000.00  per  annum  to  $7000.00  per  annum* 
There  are  other  increases  which  I  think  are  out  of  line  and 
make  inequalities  in  this  bill. 

At  the  present  time  the  salary  of  the  circuit  judges  in 
the  City  of  St.  Louis  is  $8000.00  per  year.  The  salary  of  the 
circuit  judges  in  St.  Louis  County,  since  the  enactment  of 
House  Bill  No.  78,  is  $8000.00  per  year.  The  salary  of  the 
-circuit  judges  in  Jackson  County  is  $8000,00  per  year.  All 
of  the  these  judges  are  in  their  own  county  or  city  ami  do 
not  have  to  leave  their  home  county  to  hold  court.  The  out- 
state  circuit  judges,  whose  circuits  comprise  more  than  one 
•county,  receive  compensation  at  the  rate  of  $6000*00  per  year; 
however,  $1200.00  of  this  amount  is  for  expenses,  (Section 
13393)  because  of  the  fact  that  they  are  away  from  their  home 
county  a  greater  part  of  the  time  holding  court*  In  reality 
this  makes  their  net  salary  $4800.00.  I  think  these  outstate 
circuit  judges  are  entitled  to  an  increase  in  salary  before  some 


GOVERNOB  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  111 

of  the  other  circuit  judges  have  their  salaries  increased,  for 
the  reason  that  the  outstate  judges  are  compelled  to  hold 
court  in  several  counties  and  have  their  traveling  and  other 
expenses  to  pay,  while  the  circuit  judges  in  St.  Louis  City  and 
the  counties  above  mentioned  do  not  have  to  leave  their  home 
county  and,  of  course,  have  no  such  expenses.  There  are 
several  circuits  in  the  State  which  have  six  counties,  each 
county  generally  has  three  regular  terms  of  court  each  year 
and  very  often  adjourned  terms.  This  means  that  the  rural 
circuit  judge,  who  has  six  counties,  is  holding  at  least  fifteen 
regular  terms  of  court  each  year  away  from  home  in  addition 
to  the  adjourned  terms.  This  bill  does  not  correct  this  situa- 
tion. For  instance,  the  judges  in  St.  Louis  City,  St.  Louis 
County,  and  Jackson  County  would  receive  $9000.00  per  year 
under  the  terms  of  this  bill  and  although  the  bill  provides 
for  a  salary  of  $8000.00  for  outstate  circuit  judges,  they 
would  not  receive  this  full  amount  because  Section  13393,  the 
section  under  which  they  now  receive  their  expenses,  is  repealed 
outright  by  Senate  Bill  No.  126  and  no  section  enacted  in 
lieu  thereof.  This  means  that  the  outstate  circuit  judges 
would  have  to  pay  their  expenses  while  holding  court  away 
from  home,  which  expenses  would  have  to  be  deducted  from 
their  salary.  On  the  present  basis  of  $1200.00  per  year  for 
expenses  under  Section  13393,  this  would  mean  that  their  net 
salary  would  be  $6800.00,  while  the  above  mentioned  circuit 
judges  doing  similar  work  and  remaining  in  their  home  county 
or  city  all  of  the  time  and  under  no  expenses  for  being  away 
from  their  home  county  or  city  would  receive  $9000.00  per 
year.  I  think  these  inequalities  should  be  corrected  before 
there  is  a  blanket  increase  of  salaries  for  all  judges. 

Another  provision  of  this  bill  that  does  not  meet  my 
approval  is  that,  under  the  present  law,  the  salaries,  and  in 
some  instances  part  of  the  salary  and  expenses  of  the  circuit 
judges,  are  paid  by  the  counties  and  the  City  of  St.  Louis, 
while  under  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  126  the  whole 
salary  load  is  shifted  to  the  State.  For  instance,  in  the  City 
of  St.  Louis  at  present  the  State  pays  $2000,00  per  year  of 
the  salary  of  each  circuit  judge  and  the  balance  of  $6000.00 
per  year  is  paid  by  the  City  of  St.  Louis.  There  are  eighteen 
circuit  judges  in  St  Louis,  which  means  a  shift  of  $108,000 
per  year  from  the  City  of  St.  Louis  to  the  State  by  this  bilL 


112  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  St.  Louis  County  $6000.00  of  the  $8000.00  received  by  the 
circuit  judges  is  paid  by  St.  Louis  County;  there  are  four 
judges  in  St.  Louis  County,  making  a  shift  of  $24,000.00  from 
the  county  to  the  State.  In  Jackson  County  $6000.00  of  the 
$8000.00  which  the  circuit  judges  receive  is  paid  by  Jackson 
County.  There  are  ten  judges  in  Jackson  County,  making 
a  shift  of  $60,000.00  from  the  county  to  the  State  by  this 
bill.  In  Buchanan  County  the  salary  of  the  circuit  judge  is 
$6000.00;  $4000.00  of  this  amount  is  paid  by  Buchanan 
County.  There  are  three  judges  in  this  county,  making  a 
shift  of  $12,000.00  from  Buchanan  County  to  the  State. 
In  Greene  County  the  county  pays  $4000.00  of  the  judge's 
salary  of  $6000.00;  there  are  two  circuit  judges  in  Greene 
County,  making  a  shift  of  $8000.00  to  the  State.  In  Pettis 
County,  one  judge,  $1200.00  of  his  salary  is  paid  by  the  county 
which  would  be  shifted  to  the  State.  In  Jasper  County 
$2500.00  of  the  salary  of  each  of  the  circuit  judges  is  paid  by 
the  county.  There  are  two  circuit  judges,  which  would  be 
$5000.00  per  year  shifted  from  the  county  to  the  State,  This 
makes  a  grand  total  of  $218,200.00  per  year  which  is  shifted 
to  the  State  by  this  bill.  In  addition  to  that,  the  increases 
in  salaries  provided  for  by  Senate  Bill  No.  126  amount  to 
$145,950.00  per  year,  which  added  to  the  sum  of  $218,200.00, 
which  the  State  would  have  to  pay  if  this  bill  were  enacted, 
would  make  a  grand  total  of  $364,150.00  per  year  additional 
which  the  State  would  have  to  pay,  above  what  it  now  pays, 

No  doubt  the  State  could  pay  this  increase  in  salary  at 
the  present  time,  but  increases  in  the  cost  of  government  must 
be  closely  watched  because  they  may  become  a  real  burden 
when  normal  times  return.  I  recognize  the  fact  that  sub- 
stantial salaries  should  be  paid  the  judiciary  iu  order  to  have 
efficient  and  qualified  lawyers  serve  as  judges  of  our  courts. 
However,  this  bill,  in  my  opinion,  has  too  many  inequalities 
in  the  increase  of  salaries. 

Senate  Bill  No.  126  repeals  Section  13394,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  and  does  not  enact  any  section  in  lieu 
thereof.  The  repeal  of  this  section  does  away  with  jury  com- 
missioners in  the  rural  counties  "of  Missouri.  I  think  the  cir- 
cuit judges  in  rural  Missouri  have  rendered  a  valuable  service 
as  jury  commissioners  in  assisting  the  county  courts  to  pre- 
pare jury  lists  and  drawing  the  names  of  jurors  as  is  provided 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  113 

for  by  law  at  the  present  time.  We  cannot  have  too  many 
safeguards  in  the  selection  of  jurors  who  are  to  pass  upon  the 
life,  liberty,  and  property  of  our  citizens.  The  repeal  of  Sec- 
tion 13394  will  take  away  the  supervision  of  the  circuit  judges 
over  the  selection  of  the  jury  lists  and  again  leave  it  with 
the  county  courts,  which  I  do  not  believe  should  be  done. 
If  this  section  (13394)  is  to  be  repealed  then  certainly  some 
provisions  pertaining  to  the  circuit  judges  acting  as  jury 
commissioners  should  be  enacted  in  lieu  thereof. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  do  not  believe  that  this  bill 
should  be  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER  11,  1945 
From  the  Joivmal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1855-1857 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  QTY, 
October  11,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No,  195,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Relating  to  recorders  in  all  counties  in  the  state  of 
Missouri  which  now  have  or  which  may  hereafter  have 
19,000  inhabitants  or  more,  but  not  to  exceed  200,000 
inhabitants,  according  to  the  last  decennial  census  of  the 
United  States;  providing  that  the  County  Court  shall 
compensate  the  recorder  fifty  cents  for  services  in  record- 
ing a  discharge  of  a  member  of  the  armed  forces  and 
fifty  cents  for  furnishing  a  certified  copy  of  any  public 
documents  to  certain  persons,  with  an  emergency  clause." 


114  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I  vetoed  House  Bill  No.  195  for  the  following  reasons: 

I. 

The  title  to  House  Bill  No.  195  does  not  contain  a  refer- 
ence to  that  part  of  the  body  of  the  act  which  provides  that 
the  county  court  in  the  counties  affected  by  the  act  shall  com- 
pensate the  recorder  of  deeds  "one  dollar  for  recording  or  fur- 
nishing a  certified  copy  of  each  power  of  attorney  or  instru- 
ment revoking  the  same  if  executed  by  a  member  of  the 
armed  forces  of  the  United  States,  women's  organization 
auxiliary  thereto,  or  anyone  bound  by  law  to  report  for  induc- 
tion thereinto." 

Section  23  of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  is 
as  follows: 

"No  bill  shall  contain  more  than  one  subject  which  shall 
be  clearly  expressed  in  its  title,  except  bills  enacted  under 
the  third  exception  in  section  37  of  this  article  and  gen- 
eral appropriation  bills,  which  may  embrace  the  various 
subjects  and  accounts  for  which  moneys  are  appro- 
priated." 

Where  the  title  to  an  act  descends  to  particulars  and 
matters  are  included  in  the  body  of  the  act  but  are  not  enu- 
merated in  the  title,  the  act  is  void  as  to  those  not  included 
in  the  title.  (State  v.  Sloan,  258  Mo.  305,  167  S.  W.  500; 
State  ex  rel.  v.  Hackmann,  292  Mo.  27,  237  S.  W.  742.  Rauch 
v.  Himmellberger,  305  Mo,  70,  264  S.  W.  658.) 

I  am  of  the  opinion  that  the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  195 
does  not  comply  with  Section  23  of  Article  III  of  the  Consti- 
tution of  1945  and  is  therefore  invalid. 

II. 

Under  the  provisions  of  Section  8  of  Article  VI  of  the 
Constitution  of  1945,  general  laws  for  the  organization  and 
classification  of  counties  must  be  made  and  the  number  of 
classes  shall  not  exceed  four.  Under  the  provisions  of  Section 
11  of  said  Article  VI,  the  compensation  of  all  county  officers 
shall  be  prescribed  by  law  uniform  in  operation  in  each  class 
of  counties.  It  is  impossible  to  say  whether  or  not  House 
Bill  No.  195  would  comply  with  the  above  provisions  until 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  115 

laws  have  been  enacted  classifying  the  counties  as  required  by 
Section  8  of  Article  VI. 

House  Bill  No.  195  attempts  to  enact  a  law  operative  in 
all  counties  within  the  population  limits  designated  without 
excepting  counties  which  frame,  adopt  and  amend  a  charter 
for  their  own  government.  This  exemption  is  required  under 
Section  11  of  said  Article  VI.  I  also  call  attention  to  the  fact 
that  under  Section  ^18a  of  Article  VI,  any  county  having 
more  than  eighty-five  thousand  inhabitants,  according  to  the 
census  of  the  United  States,  may  frame  and  adopt  and  amend 
a  charter  for  its  own  government;  and  under  the  provisions 
of  Section  18b  of  said  Article  VI,  such  charter  must  provide 
for  the  salaries  of  the  county  officers.  If  a  county  having 
more  than  eighty-five  thousand  inhabitants  should  adopt  a 
special  charter  for  its  own  government  the  same  would  con- 
flict with  the  provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  195. 

III. 

House  Bill  No.  195  applies  to  all  counties  in  excess  of 
19,000  inhabitants  and  not  in  excess  of  200,000  inhabitants. 
Section  12  of  Article  VI  provides  that  all  county  officers  in 
counties  having  100,000  or  more  inhabitants  excepting  public 
administrators  and  notaries  public,  shall  be  compensated  for 
their  services  by  salaries  only.  House  Bill  No.  195  conflicts 
with  said  Section  12  of  Article  VI.  However,  according  to 
the  last  decennial  census,  there  is  no  county  in  Missouri  now 
having  a  population  between  100,000  and  200,000  inhabitants. 
The  unconstitutional  inclusion  of  from  100,000  to  200,000 
would  probably  not  invalidate  the  remainder  of  the  act  if  it 
were  otherwise  constitutional. 

IV. 

House  Bill  No.  195  states  "it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the 
County  court  ...  to  compensate  the  recorder  of  deeds  fifty 
cents  for  recording  each  discharge  .  ,  .  and  fifty  cents  for 
furnishing  a  certified  copy  .  .  .  and  one  dollar  for  recording 
or  furnishing  a  certified  copy  of  each  power  of  attorney  .  .  .  ." 

Section  13  of  Article  VII  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  is 
as  follows: 


116  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"The  compensation  of  state,  county  and  municipal  officers 
shall  not  be  increased  during  the  term  of  office;  nor  shall 
the  term  of  any  officer  be  extended." 

House  Bill  No.  195  says  specifically  to  "compensate.'' 
"Compensation"  as  used  in  said  Section  13  includes  salary, 
fees,  pay  or  remuneration  for  official  services  performed.  Said 
Section  13  states  that  the  compensation  of  county  officers 
shall  not  be  increased  during  the  term  of  office.  It  is  my 
opinion  that  House  Bill  No.  195  clearly  provides  for  an  in- 
crease in  compensation  for  county  recorders.  Said  bill  has 
an  emergency  clause.  If  the  emergency  clause  is  valid  and 
the  bill  is  signed  by  the  Governor  it  would  become  effective 
at  once  and  apply  to  the  recorders  now  in  office  in  violation  of 
said  Section  13  of  Article  VII.  If  the  emergency  clause  should 
be  construed  to  be  invalid  the  bill  would  still  apply  to  the 
present  incumbents  in  office  because  there  is  no  provision  in 
the  bill  withholding  its  effective  date  until  the  beginning  of 
the  terms  of  the  next  county  recorders. 

House  Bill  No.  195  applies  to  other  counties  than  those 
in  which  the  recorder  receives  only  fees  as  compensation  be- 
cause there  are  special  statutes  giving  the  recorder  a  certain 
set  salary  in  those  counties  which  fall  within  certain  popu- 
lation groups,  which  groups  are  within  the  purview  of  House 
Bill  No.  195.  In  these  population  groups  which  are  within 
the  purview  of  House  Bill  No.  195,  there  are  sections  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  with  which  House  Bill 
No.  195  conflict.  For  instance,  Section  13487,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  provides  that  the  salary  of  the  recorder 
of  deeds  in  counties  containing  a  city  of  between  75,000  and 
200,000  inhabitants  shall  be  $3500.00  per  annum.  House  Bill 
No.  195  conflicts  with  this  section  for  the  reason  that  the 
additional  compensation  provided  for  would  increase  the  re- 
corder's compensation  to  a  figure  above  the  $3500.00  set  by 
the  section. 

House  Bill  No.  195  conflicts  with  Section  13491,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  salaries  of  officers  in 
counties  containing  a  city  between  75,000  and  200,000  inhabit- 
ants, for  the  reason  that  said  Section  13491  provides  that  all 
fees  due  or  receivable  from  any  source  shall  be  paid  into  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  117 

county  treasury  and  that  the  officers  referred  to  in  Section 
13491,  including  recorders,  shall  be  on  a  salary  basis. 

House  Bill  No.  195  conflicts  with  Section  13450,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  sets  a  maximum  upon  the 
fees  which  the  recorder  of  deeds  may  retain  in  counties  which 
have  a  population  of  100,000  inhabitants  or  less,  for  the  rea- 
son that  where  the  recorder  of  deeds  in  such  counties  was 
receiving  the  maximum  amount  allowed  him  under  this  sec- 
tion, the  additional  amount  under  House  Bill  No.  195  would 
raise  his  compensation  above  the  maximum  set  by  said  section. 

House  Bill  No.  195  conflicts  with  Section  13187,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  provides  that  the  recorder 
of  each  county  in  which  the  offices  of  recorder  of  deeds  and 
clerk  of  the  circuit  court  are  separate  shall  pay  into  the 
county  treasury  all  the  fees  received  by  him  over  and  above 
the  sum  of  $4,000.00  for  each  year  of  his  official  term,  after 
paying  out  of  such  fees  and  emoluments  such  amounts  for 
deputies  and  assistants  in  his  office  as  the  county  court  may 
deem  necessary.  It  conflicts  with  this  section  for  the  reason 
that  under  House  Bill  No.  195  the  recorder  would  be  paid 
certain  fees  out  of  the  county  treasury  by  the  county  court, 
whereas,  under  Section  13187  the  fees  which  the  recorder 
receives  over  and  above  the  sum  of  $4,000.00,  and  the  amount 
paid  out  for  Deputies  and  assistants,  shall  be  paid  into  the 
treasury  of  the  county.  Section  13187  would  require  the 
recorder  to  remit  to  the  treasury  the  fees  received  under 
House  Bill  No.  195. 

House  Bill  No.  195  conflicts  with  Section  13493,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  provides  that  every  official 
mentioned  m  the  Article,  which  includes  recorders  of  deeds 
in  counties  containing  a  city  of  between  75,000  and  200,000 
inhabitants,  shall  at  the  end  of  each  month  pay  over  to  the 
county  treasury  all  moneys  collected  by  him  as  fees.  House 
Bill  No.  195  would  have  the  same  effect  under  this  section 
as  under  Section  13187,  in  that  it  would  require  the  recorder 
in  counties  containing  a  city  of  between  75,000  and  200,000 
inhabitants  to  remit  to  the  county  treasury  the  fees  which 
are  provided  for  him  under  House  Bill  No.  195. 


118  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

For  the  above  reasons   I   cannot   approve  House   Bill 
No.  195. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER  24,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1982-1986 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  24,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  582,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  13231  of  Chapter  91,  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  issu- 
ance of  warrant  by  coroner  in  case  of  death  by  violence, 
by  striking  out  of  the  sixth  line  of  said  Section  13231  the 
word  'constable'  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  word 
'sheriff'  and  by  striking  out  of  said  line  six  the  word 
'township'  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  word  'county' 
and  also  by  striking  out  of  the  ninth  line  of  said  Section 
13231  the  word  'men'  and  the  comma  immediately  follow- 
ing the  word  'men'  and  also  by  striking  out  of  the  tenth 
line  in  said  Section  13231  the  comma  immediately  follow- 
ing the  word  'township/  " 

House  Bill  No.  582  is  one  of  a  series  intended  to  permit 
women  to  serve  on  juries. 

House  Bill  No.  576  has  been  passed  and  approved  stating 
that  every  juror,  grand  and  petit,  shall  be  a  citizen  of  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  119 

State,  resident  of  the  county,  sober  and  intelligent,  of  good 
reputation,  over  twenty-one  years  of  age  and  otherwise  quali- 
fied. This  is  a  general  provision. 

Section  22,  Article  I  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri, 
1945,  permitting  women  to  serve  on  juries  is  as  follows: 

".    .    .    No  citizen  shall  be  disqualified  from  jury  service 
because  of  sex    .    .    .    ." 

The  intention  of  the  framers  of  the  Constitution  and  also 
the  intention  of  the  General  Assembly  in  enacting  House  Bill 
No.  576  was  to  not  disqualify  a  person  from  jury  service 
because  of  sex  if  they  were  otherwise  qualified. 

House  Bill  No.  582  requires  a  juror  on  a  coroner's  jury 
to  be  a  good  and  lawful  householder.  This  is  a  stricter  require- 
ment than  is  contained  in  the  general  section  in  House  Bill 
No.  576.  Householder  generally  means  the  head  of  a  family. 
It  embraces  the  idea  of  anyone,  man  or  woman,  who  main- 
tains a  house  in  the  community.  Under  House  Bill  No.  582 
a  juror  on  a  coroner's  jury  must  not  only  be  a  householder 
but  he  or  she  must  be  a  good  and  lawful  householder.  No 
doubt  the  legislature  can  require  these  qualifications  of  a  juror 
without  violating  Section  22,  Article  I  of  the  Constitution, 
but  it  is  a  requirement  or  discrimination  without  any  apparent 
reason.  Why  impose  such  restrictions  on  those  who  serve  on 
a  coroner's  jury  and  not  on  those  who  serve  on  grand  and 
petit  juries?  It  is  an  indirect  way  of  limiting  women  from 
serving  as  jurors  on  a  coroner's  jury.  In  view  of  the  fact 
that  the  Constitution  of  1945  does  not  disqualify  a  citizen 
from  jury  service  because  of  sex  and  in  view  of  the  fact  that 
House  Bill  No.  576,  in  referring  to  the  qualification  of  jurors 
for  grand  and  petit  juries,  is  general  in  its  requirement,  I 
seriously  doubt  the  necessity  of  this  strict  requirement  of 
jurors  on  coroners'  juries. 

The  present  Section  13231  provides  that  every  coroner  so 
soon  as  he  shall  be  notified  of  the  dead  body  of  any  person 
supposed  to  have  come  to  his  death  by  violence  or  casualty 
to  make  out  his  warrant  and  direct  it  to  the  constable  of  the 
township  where  the  dead  body  is  found.  House  Bill  No.  582 
strikes  out  of  Section  13231,  line  6,  the  word  "constable"  and 
inserts  in  lieu  thereof  the  word  '  'sheriff"  and  also  strikes  out 
of  said  line  the  word  "township"  and  inserts  in  lieu  thereof 


120  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  word  "county."  It  also  strikes  out  of  said  section  in  line 
9  the  word  "men"  and  the  comma  ","  leaving  the  word 
"householders." 

Under  the  present  Section  13231  when  the  constable  is 
serving  the  warrant  to  summon  a  jury,  he  is  limited  in  select- 
ing the  jurors  to  the  same  township  where  the  dead  body  of 
the  person  is  found,  which  is  perfectly  proper  because  the 
jurisdiction  of  the  constable  is  limited  to  his  township.  But 
under  House  Bill  No.  582  the  sheriff,  who  has  county-wide  jurisr 
diction,  must  select  "good  and  lawful  householders  of  the 
same  township."  In  view  of  the  fact  that  House  Bill  No.  582 
applies  to  the  sheriff  instead  of  the  constable,  it  is  uncertain 
just  how  the  words  "good  and  lawful  householders  of  the  same 
township"  would  be  construed. 

Under  the  present  Section  13231  there  is  no  question  but 
what  these  words  refer  to  the  township  where  the  dead  body 
is  found  but  what  township  do  these  words  refer  to  under 
House  Bill  No.  582?  Do  they  refer  to  the  township  where 
the  dead  body  is  found  or  do  they  mean  that  all  the  jurors 
must  come  from  the  same  township  regardless  of  where  the 
dead  body  is  found.  In  other  words,  if  there  are,  for  instance, 
six  townships  in  a  county  and  the  first  householder  that  the 
sheriff  summons  for  jury  service  is  from  township  No.  2  then 
would  the  sheriff  have  to  select  all  the  remaining  jurors  from 
township  No.  2?  What  township  would  the  sheriff  select  the 
first  juror  from?  House  Bill  No.  582  says  "of  the  same  town- 
ship," but  it  does  not  state  from  what  township  he  is  to  make 
his  first  selection.  These  words  have  a  definite  meaning  in 
Section  13231  because  the  coroner's  warrant  is  directed  to 
the  constable  of  the  township  where  the  dead  body  is  found, 
but  under  House  Bill  No.  582  they  are  indefinite  and  con- 
fusing when  directed  to  the  sheriff  because  the  sheriff's  juris- 
diction is  county-wide.  It  is  my  opinion  that  this  section  is 
unworkable  and  would  cause  endless  confusion.  There  is  no 
reason  that  I  know  of,  why  the  sheriff  should  be  so  limited 
in  selecting  jurors  in  an  inquest  proceeding,  when  the  sheriff 
is  not  so  limited  in  selecting  grand  and  petit  jurors. 

House  Bill  No.  582  makes  no  reference  to  Section  13232 
which  provides  for  the  return  to  be  made  on  the  warrant. 
Section  13232  should  be  amended  so  that  its  provisions  refer 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  121 

to  the  sheriff  instead  of  the  constable  in  accordance  with 
Section  13231  of  House  Bill  No.  582. 

Section  13233  should  be  repealed  or  if  left  in  the  statutes 
should  be  amended  to  refer  to  the  sheriff  instead  of  the 
constable. 

Section  13244  should  be  repealed  because  the  duties  there- 
in referred  to  apply  to  the  constable  and  not  to  the  sheriff. 
I  have  been  unable  to  find  any  bill  in  this  General  Assembly 
making  the  above  corrections  in  Sections  13232,  13233  and 
13244. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  there  is  still  plenty  of  time  to 
correct  House  Bill  No.  582  it  is  my  opinion  that  this  bill 
should  be  re-written  and  that  the  words  "of  the  same  town- 
ship" in  line  7  on  page  2,  Section  13231  of  the  Truly  Agreed 
To  and  Finally  Passed  bill  should  be  stricken  out  for  the 
reason  that  they  are  confusing  and  the  section  as  written  is 
unworkable. 

As  to  whether  or  not  the  words  "good  and  lawful  house- 
holders" should  be  left  in  the  bill  is  for  the  General  Assembly 
to  determine.  If  this  bill  is  rewritten  it  is  my  suggestion  that 
Sections  13232,  13233  and  13244  should  be  included  in  the 
same  bill  and  all  should  be  corrected  at  the  same  time.  I  am 
not  opposed  to  the  purpose  of  this  bill  but  for  the  reasons 
herein  given  I  think  this  bill  should  be  corrected  before  it  is 
enacted  into  law. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  159^-1601 

EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  100,  entitled: 


122  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"An  act  to  repeal  Sections  8743  and  8751,  Article 
13,  Chapter  46  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
relating  to  the  State  Highway  Commission,  number  of 
members,  appointment,  qualifications,  term,  removal, 
compensation,  meetings,  and  quorum;  and  to  enact  three 
new  sections  in  lieu  thereof  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter,  and  designating  the  counties  comprising  the  sev- 
eral divisions  from  each  of  which  a  Commissioner  shall 
be  appointed,  and  designating  the  headquarters  of  each 
division,  to  be  known  as  Sections  8743,  8743  a  and  8751, 
with  an  emergency  clause." 

I. 

Senate  Bill  No.  100  seeks  to  repeal  Sections  8743  and 
8751,  Article  13,  Chapter  46,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  the  State  Highway  Commission,  and 
to  enact  three  new  sections  in  lieu  thereof  providing  for  an 
increase  in  the  number  of  members  of  the  State  Highway 
Commission  from  four  to  ten;  dividing  the  State  into  ten 
geographical  divisions  and  providing  for  the  appointment  of 
one  member  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  from  each  of 
the  ten  geographical  divisions.  The  principal  change  in  the 
present  law  being  an  increase  in  members  of  the  State  High- 
way Commission  from  four  to  ten,  and  designating  by  statute 
ten  geographical  divisions  of  the  State.  There  are  no  addi- 
tional powers,  duties,  or  authority  conferred  upon  the  mem- 
bers of  the  Commission  by  this  bill. 

Senate  Bill  No.  100  purports  to  carry  an  emergency 
clause  which  reads  as  follows: 

Section,  2.  It  being  necessary  to  reorganize  the  State 
Highway  Commi^ion  and  to  provide  for  the  appointment 
of  a  Commissioner  from  each  of  the  geographical  divisions 
in  order  to  more  equitably  and  amply  provide  for  the 
reconstruction  and  rehabilitation  of  the  State  Highway 
System  of  the  State  creates  an  emergency  within  the 
meaning  of  the  Constitution,  therefore  this  Act  shall  take 
effect  and  be  in  force  from  and  after  its  passage  and 
approval  by  the  Governor/' 

It  is  provided  by  Section  29,  Article  III,  of  the  Consti- 
tution of  Missouri,  1945,  as  follows: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  123 

"No  law  passed  by  the  general  assembly  shall  take 
effect  until  ninety  days  after  the  adjournment  of  the 
session  at  which  it  was  enacted,  except  an  appropriation 
act  or  in  case  of  an  emergency  which  must  be  expressed 
in  the  preamble  or  in  the  body  of  the  act,  the  general 
assembly  shall  otherwise  direct  by  a  two-thirds  vote  of 
the  members  elected  to  each  house,  taken  by  yeas  and 
nays;  provided,  if  the  general  assembly  recesses  for  thirty 
days  or  more  it  may  prescribe  by  joint  resolution  that 
laws  previously  passed  and  not  effective  shall  take  effect 
ninety  days  from  the  beginning  of  such  recess.*' 

It  has  been  uniformly  held  that  in  construing  the  effect 
of  an  emergency  clause  attached  to  a  bill  that  Section  36, 
Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1875,  which  is  comparable 
to  Section  29,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945,  must 
be  harmonized  with  Section  57,  Article  IV  of  the  same  Con- 
stitution, which  is  comparable  to  Section  52,  Article  III  of 
the  Constitution  of  1945,  applying  to  the  referendum. 

Section  52,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  reads 
as  follows: 

"A  referendum  may  be  ordered  (except  as  to  laws 
necessary  for  the  immediate  preservation  of  the  public 
peace,  health  or  safety,  and  laws  making  appropriations 
for  the  current  expenses  of  the  state  government,  for  the 
maintenance  of  state  institutions  and  for  the  support  of 
public  schools)  .  .  .  ." 

In  the  State  ex  rel.  Harvey  v.  Linville  et  al.,  300  S.  W. 
1066,  I  c.  1068,  the  court  said: 

"It  was  held  in  the  case  of  State  v.  Sullivan,  283 
Mo.  546,  224  S.  W.  327,  that  these  two  sections  of  the 
Constitution  must  be  construed  together;  that  a  declara- 
tion in  a  bill  that  it  was  an  emergency  measure  within 
the  meaning  of  the  Constitution,  did  not  make  it  so;  that 
the  emergency  must  appear  in  fact  upon  the  face  of  the 
bill  to  be  within  the  terms  of  the  Constitution,  authorizing 
an  emergency  clause  which  would  put  the  act  into  imme- 
diate effect* 


124  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


"Plainly  the  emergency  clause  in  the  act  does  not 
state  a  condition  to  which  the  emergency  provision  of 
the  Constitution  could  apply. 

"It  was  held  in  the  Sullivan  case  that  any  act  to 
which  the  referendum  might  apply  could  not  be  an  emer- 
gency measure;  that  by  the  operation  of  section  36,  art. 
4,  the  act  would  not  go  into  effect  until  90  days,  if  it  was 
one  to  which,  under  section  57  of  the  article,  the  refer- 
endum applied.  .  .  ." 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  Westhues  v,  Sullivan,  283  Mo. 
546,  1.  c.  576-577,  the  court  said: 

"There  is  no  express  declaration  in  the  emergency 
clause  to  this  act,  bringing  it  within  the  exceptions  con- 
tained in  Section  57  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution, 
The  only  laws  excepted  from  the  referendum  under  this 
constitutional  provision  are  'those  necessary  for  the  imme- 
diate preservation  of  the  public  peace,  health  or  safety, 
and  laws  making  appropriations  for  the  current  expenses 
of  the  state  government,  for  the  maintenance  of  the  state 
institutions  and  for  the  support  of  public  schools/  The 
emergency  clause  to  this  act  does  not  claim  the  act  to 
be  one  of  the  class  mentioned  in  this  exception.  Under 
Section  57,  Article  IV,  all  measures  not  falling  within  this 
excepted  class  are  subject  to  the  referendum. 

"The  emergency  clause  to  the  measure  under  con- 
sideration does  not  attempt  to  declare  such  measure  to 
be  of  the  excepted  class  in  the  constitutional  provision 
named.  It  only  declares  in  a  way,  the  legislative  reason 
for  the  conceived  emergency.  It  does  not  declare  that 
the  measure  is  'necessary  for  the  immediate  preservation 
of  the  public  peace,  health  or  safety/  If  it  had  so  declared 
the  declaration  would  have  been  false  on  the  face  of  the 
'  measure  itself.  But  for  our  present  purpose  it  suffices 
to  say  that  the  emergency  clause  does  not  bring  the 
measure  within  the  excepted  class  named  in  the  Consti- 
tution. So  that  unless  a  mere  emergency  clause  will 
exempt  the  measure  from  referendum,  the  contentions  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  125 

plaintiff  and  relator  must  fail.  They  urge  that  under 
Section  36  of  Article  IV,  the  Legislature  has  the  power, 
by  expressing  an  emergency  in  the  face  of  the  bill,  and 
passing  the  emergency  clause  by  a  two-thirds  vote,  to 
put  any  law  into  immediate  effect. 

"We  do  not  so  view  the  matter.  The  force  and  effect 
of  Section  57,  when,  read  with  Section  36  of  said  Article 
IV,  is  to  withdraw  from  the  power  of  the  Legislature  to 
put  into  immediate  effect  any  measure  subject  to  the 
referendum.  The  two  sections  must  be  read  together  and 
made  to  harmonize  in  the  light  of  the  history  of  the  con- 
stitutional provisions.  Section  57  contemplates  that  'any 
act'  of  the  Legislature  is  subject  to  the  referendum,  save 
and  except  the  measures  therein  specifically  named.  ..." 

The  Sullivan  case  has  been  cited  with  approval  on  the 
same  question  in  State  ex  rel.  v.  Maitland,  295  Mo.  338,  246, 
S.  W.  267;  Fahey  v.  Hackman,  291  Mo.  351,  237  S.  W.  752; 
and  State  ex  rel.  v.  Becker,  289  Mo.  660,  233  S.  W.  641. 

From  the  above  authorities,  it  is  plain  that  Section  2  of 
Senate  Bill  No.  100  does  not  declare  that  an  emergency  exists 
within  the  meaning  of  the  above  cited  constitutional  provisions, 
and,  therefore,  is  a  mere  nullity.  Furthermore,  even  if  it  had 
declared  that  Senate  Bill  No.  100  is  necessary  for  the  imme- 
diate preservation  of  the  public  peace,  health  or  safety,  it 
would  not  be  true  because  the  bill  merely  provides  for  increas- 
ing the  membership  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  from 
four  members  to  ten  members,  and  creates,  by  statute,  cer- 
tain geographical  divisions  which  are  in  effect  the  same  geo- 
graphical divisions  that  are  now  created  by  the  State  Highway 
Department  for  administrative  purposes.  Certainly  the  in- 
creasing of  a  commission  from  four  to  ten  members  does  not 
create  an  emergency  which  would  affect  the  peace,  health,  or 
safety  of  the  people  of  this  State.  The  purported  emergency 
clause  merely  says  that,  "It  being  necessary  to  reorganize  the 
State  Highway  Commission,  and  to  provide  for  the  appoint- 
ment of  a  Commissioner  from  each  of  the  geographical  divi- 
sions in  order  to  more  equitably  and  amply  provide  for  the 
reconstruction  and  rehabilitation  of  the  State  Highway  Sys- 
tem of  the  State  creates  an  emergency,  .  .  ."  This  state- 
ment certainly  does  not  create  an  emergency  within  the 


126  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

meaning  of  the  above  provisions  of  the  Constitution  or  with- 
in, the  definition  as  laid  down  in  the  above  entitled  case.  It  is 
my  opinion  that  the  emergency  clause  on  this  bill  is  invalid 
and  of  no  effect. 

II. 

A  brief  history  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  will  be 
discussed  in  analyzing  this  bill. 

The  present  State  Highway  Commission,  as  organized 
some  quarter  of  a  century  ago,  has  operated  under  the  limita- 
tions which  were  imposed  by  the  people  themselves  and  by 
Federal  laws  and  regulations.  The  limitations  are:  First, 
the  Centennial  Road  Law,  a  legislative  mandate  to  construct 
and  maintain  a  definite  system  of  roads;  second,  certain  re- 
quirements relating  to  the  receipt  and  use  of  Federal  funds; 
and  third,  limitation  of  finances  as  supplied  by  existing  State 
laws. 

The  Centennial  Road  Law  of  1921  laid  out  a  connected 
system  of  highways  in  the  State  and  commanded  the  Com- 
mission to  see  to  the  construction  of  those  highways  which 
have  become  known  as  the  centennial  system.  That  law, 
Section  8768,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  reads  as 
follows : 

"There  is  hereby  created  and  established  a  state 
wide  connected  system  of  hard  surfaced  public  roads 
extending  into  each  county  of  the  state,  which  shall  be 
located,  acquired,  constructed,  reconstructed,  and  im- 
proved and  ever  after  maintained  as  public  roads,  and 
the  necessary  grading,  hard  surfacing,  bridges  and  cul- 
verts therefor  shall  be  constructed  by  the  state  of  Mis- 
souri. Such  state  wide  connected  system  of  hard  sur- 
faced roads  shall  be  known  as  the  'state  highway  system/ 
and  shall  consist  of  highways  along  the  following  de- 
scribed routes.  .  .  ." 

This  centennial  system  as  laid  out  by  the  Legislature 
consisted  of  approximately  7600  miles.  These  roads  have 
been  constructed',  each  county  thus  getting  its  designated 
share  of  the  money  available.  The  construction  of  these 
roads  was  carried  out  concurrently  so  that  the  State  road 
system  in  each  county  was  completed  at  approximately  the 
same  time. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  127 

In  the  constitutional  amendment  adopted  in  1928  the 
Commission  was  authorized  for  the  first  time,  in  co-operation 
with  the  county  road  officials,  to  lay  out  and  construct  a  sup- 
plementary or  farm-to-market  system  and  was  further  directed 
to  complete,  widen,  improve,  and  maintain  the  original  cen- 
tennial system.  This  amendment .  also  authorized  the  con- 
struction of  an  additional  300  miles  to  properly  connect  up 
the  original  system,  and  authorized  the  construction  of  addi- 
tional routes  in  the  congested  traffic  areas  adjacent  to  the 
cities  of  St.  Louis  and  Kansas  City. 

Altogether,  as  of  June  30,  1945,  the  total  mileage  of  State 
roads  is  16,151  miles  of  which  8388  miles  are  the  major  system 
and  7813  miles  are  on  the  supplementary  system.  This  was 
all  built  under  the  direction  of  a  four-man  commission.  These 
commissioners  came  from  widely  distributed  points  in  the 
State  and  to  their  official  action  no  scandal  was  ever  directed. 

Each  county  has  received  the  supplementary  road  money 
allotted  under  the  constitutional  amendment  passed  in  1928 
which  set  up  a  formula  on  area  and  population  for  its  dis- 
tribution. No  commission,  regardless  of  the  number  of  com- 
missioners, could  have  changed  these  amounts. 

The  money  available  for  Missouri  under  the  present 
Federal-aid  Highway  Act  of  1944  is  $14,373,931  which  is 
allotted  by  the  Federal  government  as  follows:  $6,660,223  to 
the  centennial  system;  $4,562,550  to  the  supplementary  or 
farm-to-market  system,  and  $3,151,158  to  cities  of  over  5000 
population.  These  Federal  funds  require  an  equal  amount 
of  State  funds  to  match  and  will  make  a  total  of  $28,747,862 
each  year  for  the  three-year  period,  giving  a  yearly  total  to 
each  of  the  above  systems  as  follows: 

Centennial  System .$13,320,446 

Supplementary  System 9,125,100 

Urban  System 6,302,316 

making  an  entire  total  of  over  $86,000,000  for  the  first  three 
post-war  years. 

This  division  of  post-war  funds  is  beyond  the  power  of 
the  Commission  to  change.  Compliance  with  Federal  regu- 
lations has  been  a  part  of  the  law  of  Missouri  since  the  Cen- 
tennial Road  Law,  That  law,  Section  8754,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  reads  as  follows: 


128  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"The  commission  is  hereby  directed  to  comply  with 
the  provisions  of  any  act  of  congress  providing  for  the 
distribution  and  expenditure  of  funds  of  the  United  States 
appropriated  by  congress  for  highway  construction,  and 
to  comply  with  any  of  the  rules  or  conditions  made  by 
the  bureau  of  public  roads  of  the  department  of  agri- 
culture, or  other  branch  of  the  United  States  government, 
acting  under  the  provisions  of  federal  law  in  order  to 
secure  to  the  state  of  Missouri  funds  allotted  to  this 
state  by  the  United  States  government  for  highway  con- 
struction  " 

The  past  and  present  Commissions  have  carried  out  these 
laws  and  regulations  without  deviation  and  future  Com- 
missions must  also  do  the  same.  These  State  and  Federal 
regulations  are  mandatory  regardless  of  the  number  of  men 
on  the  Commission. 

The  Commission  is  more  or  less  hedged  in  by  the  Con- 
stitution, the  Federal  laws  and  regulations,  and  by  State  stat- 
utes and,  regardless  of  the  number  of  commissioners,  they 
have  to  follow  these  laws  and  regulations. 

Originally,  Federal  funds  coming  to  the  State  could  only 
be  spent  on  what  is  known  as  the  Federal  or  centennial  system. 
Federal  funds  were  first  made  available  for  the  construction 
of  our  supplementary  or  farm-to-market  roads  in  1935  and, 
while  standards  of  construction  were  not  the  same  as  required 
for  the  main  centennial  system,  they  imposed  some  regula- 
tions which  made  it  difficult  to  construct  a  truly  low-cost  road. 
Within  the  last  year  the  Federal  regulations,  however,  have 
been  very  materially  changed  and  in  the  future  it  will  be 
possible  to  build  a  much  lower  type  of  road  and  still  receive 
Federal  participation. 

Under  the  Constitution  of  1945  the  farm-to-market  for- 
mula by  which  the  funds  are  allotted  by  the  State  Highway 
Commission  to  the  construction  or  acquisition  of  supplemen- 
tary State  highways  and  bridges  in  each  of  the  counties  of 
the  State  shall  be  apportioned  to  the  several  counties  as  pro- 
vided in  Section  32  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution,  1945,, 
which  m  part  is  as  follows: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  129 

"One-fourth  in,  the  ratio  that  the  area  of  each  county 
bears  to  the  area  of  the  state,  one-fourth  in  the  ratio  of 
the  population,  and  two-fourths  on  such  basis  as  the 
commission  may  deem  to  be  for  the  best  interests  of  high- 
way users;  .  .  ,  ." 

The  above  apportionment  of  road  funds  was  not  in  the 
old  Constitution.  The  above  provision,  together  with  the 
entire  Section  32  of  Article  IV,  was  thoroughly  debated  in 
the  Constitutional  Convention  with  the  knowledge,  on  the 
part  of  the  members  of  the  Constitutional  Convention,  that 
the  Highway  Commission  consisted  of  four  members.  The 
voters  of  the  State  adopted  the  new  Constitution  containing 
the  above  section  with  the  knowledge  that  the  Highway  Com- 
mission consisted  of  four  members. 

The  amount  set  up  by  the  present  State  Highway  Com- 
mission under  the  above  constitutional  provision  for  the  first 
post-war  year  of  supplementary  construction  on  the  basis  of 
area  and  population  is  $6,000,000  with  an  additional  $3,000,- 
000  to  be  set  up  as  soon  as  a  survey  now  in  progress  can  be 
completed.  The  above  total  is  a  greater  amount  than  has 
been  available  for  such  supplementary  road  construction  in 
any  previous  year. 

The  ten  divisions  set  out  in  Senate  Bill  No.  100  apparently 
coincide  with  the  Highway  Department's  administrative  divi- 
sions which  were  set  up  by  the  State  Highway  Commission 
solely  for  convenient  and  efficient  administrative  purposes. 

The  appointment  of  ten  commissioners  on,  this  geo- 
graphical basis  would  result  not  only  in  sectionalizing  the 
Commission  but  also  in  an  inequitable  representation.  For 
instance,  two  divisions,  Division  No.  4,  consisting  of  twelve 
counties  including  Kansas  City,  and  Division  No.  6,  consist- 
ing of  twelve  counties  and  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  would  con- 
tain a  population  of  2,028,436.  The  population  of  the  entire 
State  is  3,784,664.  These  two  divisions  would  contain  more 
than  one-half  the  population  of  the  State  and  would  be  repre- 
sented by  only  two  commissioners,  while  the  remainder  of  the 
State,  containing  a  population  of  1,756,228,  considerably  less 
than  one-half  the  population  of  the  State,  would  be  repre- 
sented by  eight  commissioners. 


130  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

This  inequity  can  be  further  illustrated  by  the  fact  that 
the  most  populous  geographical  division,  No.  6,  having  a 
population  of  approximately  1,304,000  will  have  only  one 
representative  while  the  least  populous  geographical  division, 
having  a  population  of  only  139,000,  will  also  have  one  repre- 
sentative. In  other  words,  a  voter  of  the  least  populous  divi- 
sion will  have  almost  ten  times  as  much  representation  on  the 
Commission  as  a  voter  of  the  most  populous  division.  If  it  was 
the  purpose  of  Senate  Bill  No.  100  to  bring  about  an  equal 
representation  on  the  Commission  for  all  the  people  of  the 
State,  it  is  quite  evident  that  it  does  not  accomplish  the 
intended  purpose. 

The  traffic  needs  of  the  State  as  a  whole  and  the  best 
interest  of  the  highway  users  should  always  be  uppermost  in 
the  minds  of  the  members  of  the  Commission. 

The  members  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  are  the 
directors  of  one  of  the  largest  businesses  of  the  State.  The 
present  highway  system  represents  an  expenditure  for  con- 
struction and  maintenance  of  approximately  $452,000.00.  The 
anticipated  expenditure  in  the  future  of  additional  large  sums 
of  money  will  greatly  increase  this  amount.  These  facts 
clearly  indicate  the  necessity  for  a  Commission  to  be  selected 
to  represent  the  State  at  large,  rather  than  ten  individual  sec- 
tions of  the  State  where  the  appointed  commissioner  would 
be  responsible  only  to  his  section.  This  limited  responsibility 
would  tend  to  encourage  sectional  favoritism  and  provide 
opportunity  for  the  operation  of  pressure  groups. 

Missouri's  system  of  roads  built  under  the  present  com- 
mission set-up  ranks  close  to  the  top  nationally.  This  accom- 
plishment is  all  the  more  remarkable  in  view  of  the  fact  that 
for  many  years  Missouri  has  operated  with  a  two  cent  gas 
tax,  the  lowest  in  the  nation* 

Since  the  passage  of  the  centennial  road  law  in  1921  the 
members  of  the  Commission,  selected  by  the  various  Governors, 
have  come  from  all  sections  of  the  State.  There  is  no  admin- 
istrative division  of  the  Highway  Department  that  has  not 
had  one  or  more  members  of  the  Commission  at  some  time. 
But,  regardless  of  the  residence  of  the  commissioners  they 
have  dealt  with  State  Highway  problems  as  a  single  unit  and 
from  a  state-wide  standpoint. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  131 

There  are  approximately  117,000  miles  of  highways  of  all 
classes  within  this  State,  approximately  100,000  miles  of  which 
do  not  come  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  State  Highway 
Commission.  There  are  approximately  two  thousand  separate 
agencies,  such  as  road  districts,  special  road  districts,  town- 
ship boards,  county  courts,  cities,  towns  and  villages  which 
administer  the  more  than  100,000  miles  of  road  in  this  State 
not  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  State  Highway  Commission. 
It  is  estimated  that  these  agencies  spend  approximately  $10,- 
000,000  or  more  annually  of  the  taxpayers'  money  without 
adequate  results.  I  am  in  sympathy  with  the  demand  for 
more  rural,  farm-to-market  roads.  In  fact  in  my  inaugural 
message  to  the  General  Assembly  in  January  of  this  year  I 
stated : 

"I  direct  your  attention  to  the  fact  that  54%  of  Mis- 
souri farmers  still  live  on  dirt  roads.  Our  present  high- 
way system  should  be  extended  and  roads  constructed  so 
this  large  number  of  Missourians  may  have  access  to 
improved  roads." 

The  roads  that  the  complaint  is  made  about  are  county 
roads.  I  believe  that  if  the  number  of  agencies  in  each  county 
that  administer  the  construction  of  roads  were  reduced  and 
if  a  centralized  agency  handled  the  road  construction  in  a 
county  it  would  be  more  practical  and  better  results  would 
be  obtained.  I  believe  that  a  study  of  the  rural  road  problem 
should  be  made.  Some  plan  should  be  worked  out  whereby 
the  counties  or  civil  subdivisions  will  build  roads  that  lead 
to  the  State  system  or  to  locally  constructed  all  weather  roads. 
Under  the  present  system  every  road  district,  township  board, 
and  county  court  spends  large  sums  of  money  for  road  ma- 
chinery and  equipment,  which,  because  of  the  limitations  in 
jurisdiction  of  the  district  or  board,  is  necessarily  idle  the 
greater  part  of  the  time.  If  a  centralized  agency  in  each 
county  handled  the  construction  of  roads  it  would  stop  the 
expenditure  of  large  sums  of  money  in  the  duplication  of 
purchases  of  road  machinery  and  equipment  by  numerous  sub- 
divisions in  each  county,  which  funds  could  be  used  to  good 
advantage  in  the  actual  construction  of  roads. 

For  the  reasons  above  set  forth,  I  am  of  the  opinion  that 
it  is  for  the  best  interest  of  the  State  as  a  whole  to  carry  out 


132  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  post-war  program  of  road  construction,  with  the  same 
number  of  members  on  the  Highway  Commission  that  have 
built  our  present  State  system. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY  30,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2808-2810 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  30,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  350,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  3652,  Article  1,  Chapter  28,  Re- 

,  vised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  damages  for 

injuries  resulting  in  death  in  certain  cases,  and  to  enact 

in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  to  be  known  as  Section  3652, 

and  relating  to  the  same  subject." 

House  Bill  No.  350  and  House  Bill  No.  389  are  companion 
bills,  I  have  this  day  approved  House  Bill  No.  389,  It  amends 
Section  3654,  Article  1,  Chapter  28,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  damages  recoverable  in  actions  for 
death  by  raising  the  amount  recoverable  from  not  exceeding 
$10,000.00  to  not  exceeding  $15,000.00.  Since  this  statute 
deals  with  compensatory  damages  and  is  non-discriminatory 
as  to  the  liability  of  defendants  and  the  rights  of  plaintiffs, 
I  have  approved  this  bill. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  133 

House  Bill  No.  350  repeals  Section  3652,  Article  1,  Chap- 
ter 28,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  the  penal  section 
relating  to  damages  for  injuries  resulting  in  death  in  certain 
accidents  and  enacts  a  new  section  in  lieu  thereof  raising  the 
limit  of  the  penalty  recoverable  from  not  exceeding  $10,- 
000.00  to  not  exceeding  $15,000.00.  Prior  to  1905  this  section 
of  the  statutes  provided  for  a  penalty  of  $5,000.00,  no  more 
and  no  less.  The  statute  at  that  time  applied  to  railroad 
locomotives,  car  or  train  of  cars,  steamboats  and  stage  coaches. 
In  1905  the  legislature  rewrote  this  section  and  added  street 
oars,  motor  cars,  and  automobiles  used  as  public  conveyances 
and  struck  out  the  penalty  of  $5,000.00  and  provided  that 
the  recovery  should  be  in  an  amount  not  less  than  $2,000.00 
and  not  more  than  $10,000.00  in  the  discretion  of  the  jury. 

After  the  amendment  in  1905  some  confusion  existed  in 
changing  the  section  from  a  flat  $5,000.00  to  one  ranging  from 
$2,000.00  to  $10,000.00  to  be  awarded  as  a  penalty  in  the 
discretion  of  the  jury.  However,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Mis- 
souri in  the  case  of  Grier  vs.  Kansas  City,  Clay  County  and 
St.  Joseph  Railway  Company,  286  Missouri  523,  pointed  out 
the  clear  intent  of  the  legislature  as  disclosed  by  the  use  of 
the  words  "as  a  penalty"  and  held  that  in  the  case  of  wrongful 
death  occasioned  by  a  common  carrier  enumerated  in  the 
penalty  statute  the  entire  amount  could  be  awarded  as  a 
penalty,  even  though  the  deceased  left  no  dependent  relatives 
and  even  though  the  personal  representative  maintaining  the 
suit  was  unable  to  show  any  compensatory  damages.  Since 
the  Grier  decision  the  courts  have  held  that  the  entire  $10,- 
000.00  may  be  recovered  as  penalty  even  in  the  absence  of 
any  showing  of  any  compensatory  damages  and  since  House 
Bill  No,  350  makes  practically  no  change  in  Section  3652  ex- 
cept to  increase  the  maximum  limit  from  $10,000.00  to  $15,^ 
000.00,  it  is  obvious  that  the  Grier  decision  will  continue  to 
govern  such  recoveries. 

I  think  this  statute  is  unfair  and  discriminatory  against 
present  day  railroads,  street  railroads,  motor  bus  companies, 
and  other  carriers  named  in  said  section.  Said  bill  in  its  pres- 
ent form  limits  the  right  to  recover  a  penalty  in  death  cases 
to  actions  against  persons  or  corporations  operating  public 
conveyances  such  as  trains,  street  cars,  steamboats,  stage 
coaches,  automobiles,  and  motor  cars.  The  discrimination 


134  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

against  certain  classes  of  defendants,  such  as  railroads,  street 
car  companies,  and  motor  bus  companies  and  in  favor  of  cer- 
tain other  classes  of  defendants  such  as  operators  of  private 
trucks  and  probably  contract  haulers,  operators  of  private 
automobiles  and  operators  of  airplanes,  whether  private  or 
public,  is  carried  forward  without  change  in  House  BUI  No. 
350  although  the  limit  of  the  penalty  recoverable  is  increased 
fifty  per  cent.  If  we  are  going  to  increase  the  penalty  then  I 
think  these  discriminations  should  be  eliminated.  This  bill 
not  only  carries  forward  discriminations  against  certain  classes 
of  defendants  but  also  carries  forward  certain  discriminations 
against  certain  classes  of  plaintiffs  in  their  suits  brought  in 
death  cases.  The  following  are  illustrations: 

The  parents  of  a  19  year  old  son  permit  him  to  take 
flying  lessons.  The  airplane  school,  through  the  grossest  kind 
of  negligence,  fails  to  refuel  or  install  or  repair  a  vital  part 
of  the  airplane  before  the  flight,  and  the  son  is  killed  in  the 
airplane  crash.  The  parents  cannot  sue  under  this  penal  act 
because  no  penal  action  is  authorized  against  this  type  of 
defendants.  They  are  compelled  to  sue  under  the  compen- 
satory section  and  obviously  from  a  compensatory  standpoint 
their  damages,  based  upon  possible  contributions  from  their 
minor  son  until  he  reaches  his  majority,  must  be  limited  to  a 
relatively  nominal  amount.  The  same  would  be  true  in  the 
case  of  a  plane  operated  by  one  of  the  large  air  transport  lines. 

The  parents  of  a  minor  daughter  permit  her  to  use  the 
street  car  in  going  to  and  from  school.  While  standing  in  a 
safety  zone  awaiting  the  street  car,  a  drunken  driver,  worth 
a  million  dollars,  and  carrying  $50,000.00  public  liability  in- 
surance, crashes  through  the  safety  zone  and  kills  the  daughter. 
The  parents  cannot  sue  under  the  penal  statute  because  the 
defendant  does  not  belong  to  the  class  of  defendants  against 
whom  a  penal  action  is  authorized.  They  must  sue  under  the 
compensatory  statute,  and  their  damages  are  limited  to  the 
actual  pecuniary  loss. 

An  itinerant  in,  St.  Louis  if  [is?]  fatally  injured  by  a  street 
car.  It  develops  that  he  is  not  survived  by  any  widow  or 
children,  or  parents,  or  other  relatives,  except  a  remote  aext 
of  kin  in  the  State  of  Maine,  whom  he  has  never  seen.  This 
bill  would  authorize  even  the  public  administrator  in  charge 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  135 

of  his  estate  to  prosecute  an  action  against  the  street  car  com- 
pany for  a  penalty  of  not  to  exceed  $15,000.00, 

If  a  deceased  should  come  to  his  death  by  reason,  of  being 
struck  by  a  common  carrier  freight  truck  the  entire  penalty 
of  $15,000.00  could  be  awarded,  but  if  the  same  person  had 
met  his  death  by  the  negligent  operation  of  a  private  carrier 
truck  or  a  huge  transport,  only  compensatory  damages  could 
be  awarded. 

I  have  no  objection  to  the  maximum  of  $15,000.00  that 
the  legislature  has  included  in  this  bill  but  I  do  think  this 
bill  should  be  re-drafted,  brought  up  to  date  and  the  discrimi- 
nations removed.  Since  we  are  revising  the  statutes  I  believe 
we  should  take  out  the  stage  coaches,  put  in  the  airplane  and 
otherwise  modernize  this  section. 

House  Bill  No.  350  contains  another  error  that  should 
be  corrected.  In  lines  44  and  45,  page  2  of  the  Truly  Agreed 
To  and  Finally  Passed  bill  are  the  words  "where  the  person 
executing  the  decree  if  adoption  resided  at  the  time  of  such 
adoption;  etc."  (Underscoring  mine.)  The  present  Section 
3652  reads  "where  the  person  executing  the  deed  of  adoption 
resided  at  the  time  of  such  adoption,  etc."  Prior  to  1917  the 
only  method  of  adoption  was  by  deed.  The  present  method 
of  adoption  is  found  in  Article  1,  Chapter  56,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  and  does  not  provide  for  adoption  by 
deed.  A  petition  is  filed  in  the  Juvenile  Division  of  the  Cir- 
cuit Court,  service  is  had  on  the  parties,  a  hearing  is  held  be- 
fore the  Court  and  if  the  Court  is  satisfied  from  the  evidence 
that  the  adoption  should  be  made  the  Court  executes  the 
decree  setting  forth  the  adoption.  The  decree  is  not  executed 
by  a  person  as  set  forth  in  line  44,  page  2  of  the  bill.  This 
wording  would  cause  endless  confusion,  especially  in  view  of 
the  fact  that  on  page  3,  line  50,  of  the  bill  the  words  "deed 
of  adoption"  are  left  in  the  bill  and  are  not  changed  to  read 
"decree  of  adoption."  The  word  "if  in  line  44,  page  2,  evi- 
dently was  intended  for  "of"  but  this  error  is  in  the  original 
bill  and  was  not  corrected  in  the  passage  of  the  bill  through 
either  House.  If  this  bill  is  re-drafted  the  adoption  provision 
in  regard  to  minor  children  should  be  in  accordance  with  the 


136  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

provisions  of  Article  1,  Chapter  56,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  6,  1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  2491-2492 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  6,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State   of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  219,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  10952,  Article  2,  Chapter  74, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  who  shall 
administer  oaths  relating  to  assessment — penalty  for  re- 
ceiving lists  not  sworn  to — duty  of  criminal  courts,  by 
striking  out  of  the  fourth  line  of  said  Section  10952  the 
words  'justices  of  the  peace'  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof 
the  word  'magistrates'  and  by  striking  out  of  the  fourth 
and  fifth  lines  of  said  Section  10952  the  words  'probate 
judges'  and  also  by  striking  out  the  comma  after  the 
word  'judges'  above  mentioned,  and  providing  for  effec- 
tive date." 

Senate  Bill  No.  219  amends  Section  10952,  Article  2, 
Chapter  74,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  by  striking 
out  certain  words  and  inserting  certain  other  words  in  lieu 
thereof.  However,  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No,  469  repeals  Section  10952,  Article  2,  Chapter  74,  Re- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  137 

vised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  re-writes  said  section  in 
almost  the  identical  words,  the  same  being  Section  16  of  said 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  469.  I  ap- 
proved House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  469 
December  5,  1945.  It  has  an  emergency  clause  making  it 
effective  from  and  after  its  passage  and  approval. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Section  10952  of  Senate  Bill  No. 
219  is  a  duplicate  of  Section  16  of  House  Committee  Substi- 
tute for  House  Bill  No.  469  and  is  now  in  effect  and,  there- 
fore, Senate  Bill  No.  219  should  not  become  a  law. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2601 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  18,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  69,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  11965,  11967,  11968  and  11969, 
of  Article  20,  Chapter  76,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  relating  to  registration  of  voters  in  cities  of  this 
state  which  now  contain  or  may  hereafter  contain  not 
less  than  30,000  inhabitants  nor  more  than  80,000  inhab- 
itants, and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  four  new  sections  to 
be  known  as  Sections  11965,  11967,  11968  and  11969 
relating  to  registration  of  qualified  voters  in  cities  of  this 
state  which  now  contain  or  may  hereafter  contain  not  less 
than  30,000  inhabitants  nor  more  than  50,000  inhabitants, 
with  an  emergency  clause." 


138  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

On  page  2,  Section  11965,  Line  2,  the  words  "in  cities" 
should  be  inserted  after  the  word  "voters"  and  before  the 
word  "of."  It  is  my  opinion  that  this  section  as  now  written 
is  very  confusing  and  in  fact  meaningless  unless  the  words 
"in  cities"  are  inserted  as  above  stated. 

It  is  obvious  that  the  section  refers  to  cities  containing 
not  less  than  30,000  inhabitants  nor  more  than  50,000  inhabit- 
ants but  it  does  not  say  so.  If  this  section  is  placed  in,  the 
statutes  without  the  benefit  of  the  title  of  the  act  and  the 
enacting  clause,  I  am  sure  that  it  would  cause  endless  con- 
fusion and  I  believe  that  it  should  be  corrected  before  enacted 
into  law. 

Also,  on  page  2,  Section  11965,  Line  8,  the  words  "special 
charter"  are  used.  In  view  of  the  provisions  of  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  491,  which  have  been  approved 
and  which  define  constitutional  charter  cities,  I  am  wonder- 
ing if  Senate  Bill  No.  69  should  not  also  include  constitutional 
charter  cities  in  addition  to  those  organized  under  general  law 
or  special  charter. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  3083~$08$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  19,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  719, 
entitled : 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  139 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  assessment,  levy,  equalization 
and  collection  of  taxes  on  real  and  tangible  personal 
property  and  to  provide  for  the  taxation  of  merchants 
and  manufacturers  and  the  establishment  of  a  county 
board  of  equalization  in  counties  of  the  first  class,  with 
an  emergency  clause." 

Because  this  bill  contains  errors  and  conflicting  provisions 
and  for  the  other  reasons  hereinafter  set  forth,  I  am  unable 
to  approve  it: 

I.  On  page  3,  Section  8,  line  7,  the  words  "state  auditor" 
should  be  "director  of  revenue." 

II.  On  page  8,  Section  25,  line  6,  the  words  "state  audi- 
tor" should  be  "director  of  revenue." 

III.  On  page  17,  Section  43,  lines  9  and  10,  the  dates 
"the  first  day  of  January  and  the  first  day  of  March  in  each 
year"  conflict  with  the  dates  in  House  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  539,  which  is  the  general  law  applying  to 
the  entire  State. 

IV.  On  page  17,  Section  44,  lines  11  and  12,  the  same 
dates  "the  first  day  of  January  and  the  first  day  of  March 
next  preceding,"  conflict  with  the  dates  in  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  539,  which  is  the  general  law 
applying  to  the  entire  State.     I  think  dates  and  other  pro- 
visions of  tax  law  should  be  uniform,  if  possible,  for  the  entire 
State. 

V.  Or*  page  19,  Section  50,  lines  5  and  6,  the  compensa- 
tion of  the  members  of  the  county  board  of  equalization  is 
fixed  at  $1500.00  each  per  year. 

The  compensation  of  the  members  of  the  county  board 
of  equalization  as  fixed  by  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  467,  which  has  been  enacted  and  approved, 
is  $5.00  per  day  for  each  day  they  shall  be  present  and  act  in 
the  performance  of  their  duties  as  members  of  the  county  board 
of  equalization.  I  think  this  provision  in  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  467,  which  applies  to  the  entire 
State,  is  a  much  better  provision  with  reference  to  the  com- 


140  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

pensation  of  the  members  of  the  county  board  of  equalization* 
The  compensation  of  $1500.00  for  each  member  per  year  is. 
no  doubt,  an  increase  in  compensation  and  I  believe  will 
result  in  less  attendance  of  the  members  of  the  county  board 
of  equalization  than  if  they  were  to  receive  $5.00  per  day  for 
each  day  that  they  are  present  and  act  in  the  performance  of 
their  duties  as  members  of  the  county  board  of  equalization. 
I  know  of  no  valid  reason  why  the  members  of  the  county 
board  of  equalization  in  counties  of  the  first  class  should  be 
placed  on  a  salary  basis  of  $1500.00  per  member  per  year 
while  members  of  the  county  boards  of  equalization  in  the 
remainder  of  the  State  are  on  a  per  diem  basis. 

VI.  On  page  23,  Section  60,  this  section  in  effect  pro- 
vides that  if  the  State  Tax  Commission  fails  to  file  its  report 
before  or  during  the  session  of  the  county  board  of  equaliza- 
tion the  findings  of  the  county  board  of  equalization  shall  be 
final. 

In  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  467 
there  is  a  provision  that  in  case  the  report  of  equalization 
from  the  State  Tax  Commission  is  not  received  before  or  during 
the  session  of  the  county  board  of  equalization  then  it  shall 
be  the  duty  of  the  county  clerk  to  adjust  the  tax  books  accord* 
ing  to  such  report  when  received.  In  other  words,  the  pro- 
visions of  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
719  conflict  with  the  general  law  of  the  State  as  set  forth  in 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  467.  I  do 
not  believe  that  the  findings  of  the  county  board  of  equaliza- 
tion should  be  final.  I  believe  that  the  report  of  equalization: 
from  the  State  Tax  Commission  should  be  considered  by  the 
county  board  of  equalization  and  the  tax  books  adjusted 
according  to  such  report.  There  is  no  reason  why  the  find- 
ings of  the  county  board  of  equalization  in  counties  within 
the  first  class,  such  as  St.  Louis  and  Jackson  Counties,  should 
not  be  handled  in  the  same  manner  as  the  other  counties  in 
the  State. 

VII.  Section,  61,  pages  23  and  24,  conflicts  with  the  pro* 
visions  of  Section  9  on  page  3.    Section  61  provides,  among 
other  things,  that  the  county  court  shall  facilitate  and  expedite 
the  assessment,  calculation,  extension,  and  collection  of  taxes 
and  prescribe  the  method  or  system  to  facilitate  the  same* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  141 

Such  system  shall  specify  the  kind  of  books  and  forms  to  be 
used  etc.,  and  shall  prescribe  the  method  and  manner  of  ex- 
tending or  computing  the  taxes  and  the  form  and  manner  of 
preparation  of  the  tax  bills. 

Section  9  provides  that  the  State  Tax  Commission  shall 
design  the  necessary  assessment  blanks  and  all  other  necessary 
forms  which  forms  shall  contain  a  classification  of  all  tangible 
personal  property  and  shall  furnish  to  the  county  clerk  and 
county  assessor  etc. 

In,  other  words,  there  is  a  conflict  of  authority  between 
the  State  Tax  Commission  and  the  county  court  in  these  two 
sections  of  the  same  bill. 

Section  61  on  page  23  of  House  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  719  also  conflicts  with  the  provisions  of 
Section  15,  paragraph  11,  page  12  of  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  528,  in  that  the  State  Tax  Com- 
mission in  No.  528  prescribes  the  form  of  all  blanks  and  books 
that  are  used  in  the  assessment  and  collection  of  the  general 
property  tax  except  as  otherwise  provided  by  law,  while  Sec- 
tion 61  of  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
719  provides  that  the  county  court  shall  specify  the  kind  of 
books  and  forms  to  be  used  etc. 

VIII.     House  Bill  No.  719  was  introduced  October  31, 

1945.  It  passed  the  House  as  a  House  Committee  Substitute 
on  November  *29,   1945.     It  did  not  pass  the  Senate  until 
January  23,  1946,  and  on  January  29,  1946,  the  House  con- 
curred in  the  Senate  amendments.     However,  according  to 
Section  65,  which  contains  the  emergency  clause,  there  is  a 
provision  as  follows: 

"Whereas  by  virtue  of  the  provisions  of  the  new  state 
constitution,  changes  are  required  to  be  made  in  the 
assessment  and  collection  of  taxes,  and  in  procedures  con- 
nected therewith  so  that  they  can  be  put  into  operation 
not  later  than  January  1st,  1946  etc." 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  date  of  January  1,  1946,  is  a 
vital  part  of  the  emergency  clause  and  one  of  the  reasons 
given  why  there  was  an  alleged  emergency.  However,  the 
fact  that  the  bill  did  not  pass  the  Senate  until  January  23, 

1946,  and  the  Senate  amendments  were  not  concurred  in  by 


142  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  House  until  January  29,  1946,  destroys  the  effectivenes$ 
of  the  emergency  clause,  because  the  bill  was  passed  after 
January  1,  1946,  the  date  that  the  emergency  clause  states 
was  necessary  for  the  bill  to  be  put  into  operation.  The  very 
fact  that  the  bill  was  finally  passed  on  January  29,  1946, 
shows  that  it  was  not  necessary  to  be  put  into  operation  by 
January  1,  1946.  Even  if  this  bill  had  been  approved  I  doubt 
if  it  would  have  become  effective  until  ninety  days  after  the 
adjournment  of  the  legislature. 

IX.  I  realize  that  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  719  is  a  bill  providing  for  the  assessment,  levy,  equali- 
zation, and  collection  of  taxes  on  real  and  tangible  personal 
property  in  counties  within  the  first  class.  However,  laws 
of  this  importance  should  be  correctly  written  and  without 
conflicting  provisions.  It  is  my  opinion  that  if  this  bill  is 
necessary  that  it  can  be  corrected,  re-introduced  and  passed 
within  a  short  time.  However,  it  is  also  my  opinion  that  if 
it  should  not  be  re-introduced  that  the  duties  of  the  county 
board  of  equalization  in  counties  of  the  first  class  can  be  per- 
formed under  the  provisions  of  the  bills  which  have  been  en- 
acted and  approved  for  the  entire  State. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

MAY  2,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  2,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No,  803,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  143 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  11125  of  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  537,  enacted  by  the  63rd  Gen- 
eral Assembly  and  approved  by  the  Governor  Dec.  5, 
1945,  and  to  repeal  Section  11126  of  Article  9,  Chapter 
74,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  all  relating  to 
delinquent  and  back  taxes,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof 
two  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject  and  to  be 
known  as  Sections  11125  and  11126." 

Section  11125  on  page  1,  omits  the  proviso  permitting 
the  payment  of  taxes,  penalty,  interest,  and  costs  before  the 
property  is  sold.  This  proviso  was  in  Section  11125  of  the 
1939  Statutes  and  also  in  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  537  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  approved 
December  5,  1945.  The  taxpayer  should  be  entitled  to  pay 
his  delinquent  taxes  with  penalty,  interest,  and  costs  at  any 
time  before  his  property  is  sold.  There  is  no  occasion  to  repeal 
Section  11125  as  written  in  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  537  unless  it  would  be  to  change  the  date  of 
sale  from  the  first  Monday  in  November  to  the  second  Mon- 
day in  September  as  is  provided  for  in  House  Bill  No.  803. 
I  have  no  objection  to  such  a  change  in  the  date  of  sale  but 
I  do  object  to  striking  off  the  proviso  in  this  bill  as  above 
set  forth. 

Under  Section  13,  Article  X  of  the  Constitution  of  1945 
it  is  provided  that: 

"No  real  property  shall  be  sold  for  state,  county  or  city 
taxes  without  judicial  proceedings,  unless  the  notice  of 
sale  shall  contain  the  names  of  all  record  owners  thereof, 
or  the  names  of  all  owners  appearing  on  the  land  tax 
book,  and  all  other  information  required  by  law." 

This  section  states  unless  the  notice  of  sale  contains  the  names 
of  all  record  owners  thereof  or  the  names  of  all  owners  appear- 
ing on  the  land  tax  book,  etc.  Section  11126,  page  2,  lines  6 
to  12,  inclusive,  of  House  Bill  No.  803  states: 

"And  it  shall  only  be  necessary  in  the  printed  and  pub- 
lished list  to  state  in  the  aggregate  the  amount  of  taxes, 
penalty,  interest  and  cost  due  thereon,  each  year  sep- 
arately stated,  and  the  land  therein  described  shall  be  de- 


144  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

scribed  in  forty-acre  tracts  or  other  legal  subdivisions,  and 
the  lots  shall  be  described  by  number,  block,  addition,  etc. :" 

The  Constitution  says  that  no  real  property  shall  be  sold 
without  judicial  proceedings,  unless  the  notice  of  sale  shall 
contain  the  names  of  all  record  owners,  etc.  In  lines  6  and  7 
of  Section  11126,  page  2,  it  says  that  it  shall  only  be  necessary 
in  the  printed  and  published  list  to  state  in  the  aggregate  the 
amount  of  taxes,  penalties,  interest  and  costs  due  thereon 
.  .  .  and  the  land  described  etc.  No  mention  is  made  that 
this  notice  shall  contain  the  names  of  the  owners  of  the  land 
appearing  on  the  land  tax  book  as  required  by  Section  13, 
Article  X  of  the  Constitution.  Said  Section  11126  of  House 
Bill  No.  803  was  in  the  original  Jones-Munger  Tax  Law  and 
was  severely  criticized  after  the  law  became  operative  because 
so  many  land  owners  who  were  unfamiliar  with  the  legal  de- 
scription of  their  property  did  not  know  that  their  land  was 
being  advertised  for  sale  for  delinquent  taxes.  Their  name  did 
not  appear  in  the  notice  because  it  was  not  necessary  for  it 
to  appear  under  the  provisions  of  Section  11126,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939.  This  worked  a  hardship  on  many 
land  owners.  As  a  result  of  this  hardship  the  Constitutional 
Convention  wrote  Section  13,  Article  X  in  the  1945  Consti- 
tution. It  is  true  that  the  provisions  of  Section  13,  Article 
X  of  the  Constitution  are  copied  in  Section  11125  of  House 
Bill  No.  803,  pages  1  and  2,  lines  5  to  9,  inclusive.  In  my 
opinion  this  does  not  help  the  situation.  The  Constitution 
specifically  states  what  the  notice  shall  contain.  Merely  copy- 
ing the  Constitution  into  the  bill  does  not  cure  the  evil  The 
statute  must  carry  out  the  mandate  of  the  Constitution, 
The  provision  in  Section  11126,  line  7,  does  not  do  this.  In 
fact  it  conflicts  with  the  Constitution  because  it  says  "and  it 
shall  only  be  necessary  in  the  printed  and  published  list  to 
state,  etc."  No  mention  is  made  that  the  notice  must  contain 
the  name  of  the  record  owner  or  the  name  of  the  owner  appear- 
ing on  the  land  tax  book  as  required  by  the  Constitution, 
For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  145 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

MAY  3,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  3,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  857,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  create  the  office  of  clerk  of  the  county  court; 
provide  for  the  election  and  proceedings  relative  thereto, 
the  appointment,  term  of  office,  and  qualifications  of 
clerks  of  the  county  courts;  provide  for  the  oaths  and 
bonds  of  said  clerk;  provide  certain  powers  and  duties  of 
said  clerks  and  for  the  keeping  of  certain  records  and 
making  of  certain  quarterly  returns  by  said  clerk;  provide 
where  the  office  of  clerk  of  the  county  court  and  the 
records  and  property  belonging  to  such  office  shall  be 
kept,  and  for  the  delivery  of  said  records  and  property 
to  the  successor  in  office  of  said  clerk;  provide  for  the 
suspension  from  office  of  clerks  of  the  county  courts  and 
proceedings  relative  thereto;  to  prohibit  clerks  of  the 
county  courts  from  purchasing,  dealing  and  speculating 
in  county  warrants,  claims  and  demands  against  the 
county  of  which  he  is  clerk,  and  provide  certain  other 
acts  which  constitute  misdemeanors  in  office,  and  fixing 
penalties  for  the  violation  thereof." 

County  clerks  at  present  are  elected  under  authority  of 
Section  13283,  Article  1,  Chapter  92,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  which  provides  for  a  four  year  term  for  clerks 
of  all  courts  of  record.  Under  the  1945  Constitution  county 
courts  are  not  defined  to  be  courts  of  record  and  on  July  1, 


146  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

1946,  Section  13283  will  become  inoperative  insofar  as  county 
clerks  are  concerned.  However,  under  Section  3  of  the  Sched- 
ule of  the  Constitution  of  1945,  the  terms  of  office  of  county 
clerks  are  not  affected  by  the  new  Constitution  and  accord- 
ingly all  present  county  clerks  will  serve  their  terms  of  four 
years  which  will  expire  the  first  Monday  in  January,  1947. 

Section  4,  page  2,  lines  1  to  4,  inclusive,  of  House  Bill 
No.  857  provides  that  when  any  vacancy  shall  occur  in  the 
office  of  clerk  of  the  county  court  by  death,  resignation,  re- 
moval, refusal  to  act,  or  otherwise,  it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the 
county  court  to  fill  such  vacancy.  This  section  is  almost 
identical  with  Section  13284,  Article  1,  Chapter  92,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  except  in  Section  13284  it  is  pro- 
vided that  it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  Governor  to  fill  such 
vacancy.  This  section,  providing  that  the  Governor  shall  fill 
such  vacancy,  has  been  the  law  since  1877. 

Vacancies  in  all  county  offices  except  sheriff  and  coroner 
have  always  been  filled  by  the  Governor  in  accordance  with 
Section  11,  Article  V  of  the  1875  Constitution.  In  the  case 
of  the  sheriff  and  coroner  there  was  a  specific  provision  in 
Section  11  of  Article  IX  of  the  1875  Constitution  providing 
that  a  vacancy  in  the  office  of  sheriff  or  coroner  shall  be  filled 
by  the  county  court.  The  provisions  of  Section  11  of  Article 
IX  of  the  1875  Constitution  pertaining  to  the  sheriff  and 
coroner  were  not  carried  forward  into  the  1945  Constitution; 
however,  Section  11,  Article  V  of  the  1875  Constitution  author- 
izing the  Governor  to  fill  vacancies  in  public  offices  was  carried 
forward  in  the  1945  Constitution  with  practically  no  change 
in  substance,  it  being  Section  4,  Article  IV  of  the  1945 
Constitution. 

The  fact  that  the  provision  of  the  1875  Constitution, 
Section  11,  Article  IX,  authorizing  the  county  court  to  fill 
the  vacancy  in  the  office  of  sheriff  and  coroner  was  not  carried 
forward  into  the  1945  Constitution  is  evidence  of  the  inten- 
tion of  the  Constitutional  Convention  to  authorize  the  Gov- 
ernor to  fill  all  vacancies  in  public  office  and  do  away  with 
the  divided  authority  that  has  existed  under  the  old  Con- 
stitution in  filling  vacancies  in  county  offices.  There  should 
be  uniformity  of  procedure  in  filling  vacancies  ia  public  office. 
The  Governor  should  not  fill  some  vacancies  and  some  other 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  147 

official  fill  other  vacancies.     I  am  opposed  to  this  provision 
in  Section  4  of  House  Bill  No.  857  on  principle. 

Section  2,  lines  3,  4,  and  5  of  House  Bill  No.  857  provides 
for  the  election  in  each  county  of  a  clerk  of  the  county  court 
who  shall  be  commissioned  by  the  Governor,  etc.  No  pro- 
vision is  made  in  House  Bill  No.  857  as  to  who  shall  commis- 
sion the  county  clerk  appointed  by  the  county  court.  In  other 
words,  House  Bill  No.  857  provides  that  the  county  clerks 
who  are  elected  shall  be  commissioned  by  the  Governor  but 
no  provision  is  made  for  those  appointed  by  the  county 
courts.  Section  5  of  Article  IV  of  the  1945  Constitution  pro- 
vides "The  Governor  shall  commission,  all  officers  unless  other- 
wise provided  by  law."  In  House  Bill  No.  857  there  is  no 
* 'otherwise  provided  by  law." 

I  know  of  no  valid  reason  why  an  exception  should  be 
made  in  filling  vacancies  in  the  office  of  county  clerk. 

House  Bill  No.  857  does  not  provide  compensation  for 
the  office  of  county  clerk.  The  compensation  for  county 
clerks  is  in  separate  acts. 

In  counties  of  the  first  class  the  provision  for  salary  is 
included  in  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
913  which  has  not  been  passed  but  is  on  the  calendar  for  third 
reading  and  final  passage  in  the  House  of  Representatives. 

Salaries  for  county  clerks  in  counties  of  the  second  class 
have  been  provided  by  House  Bill  No.  895  which  has  been 
passed  and  approved.  Salaries  for  county  clerks  in  counties 
of  the  third  class  have  been  provided  by  House  Bill  No.  867 
which  has  been  passed  and  approved.  Salaries  for  county 
clerks  in  counties  of  the  fourth  class  have  been  provided  by 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  768  which 
has  been  passed  and  approved. 

However,  House  Bill  No.  857  is  apparently  in  conflict 
with  House  Bill  No.  895  in  the  following  respect: 

House  Bill  No.  857  in  Section  11,  lines  12  to  18,  inclu- 
sive, provides  as  follows: 

"The  county  court  shall  .  .  .  allow  all  necessary  dep- 
uty, assistant  and  clerk  hire,  not  exceeding  the  amount 
authorized  by  law,  and  deduct  the  same  from  the  aggre- 
gate amount  of  compensation  payable  to  the  clerk  of  the 
county  court." 


148  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

House  Bill  No.  895  provides  in  Section  1  'The  county 
clerk,  in  all  counties  of  the  second  class,  shall  receive  the  sum 
of  $4000.00  as  annual  compensation  for  his  services  .  .  .  ." 
If  the  provisions  of  Section  11  of  House  Bill  No.  857  were 
to  be  followed  the  deputies  and  assistants  of  the  county  clerks 
in  counties  of  the  second  class  would  receive  a  portion  of  the 
above  amount  of  $4000.00  which  will  unquestionably  leave 
the  county  clerk  with  little  or  no  pay  for  the  reason  that 
Section  11  of  House  Bill  No.  857  authorizes  the  deputy  hire 
to  be  deducted  from  the  aggregate  amount  of  compensation 
payable  to  the  clerk  of  the  county  court. 

Said  Section  11  of  House  Bill  No.  857  in  lines  2  and  3 
contains  the  provision  that  the  clerk  of  the  county  court  "shall 
make  return  quarterly  to  the  county  court  of  all  fees  by  him 
received  .  .  .  ."  Section  3  of  House  Bill  No.  895,  lines  4 
and  5,  provides  that  the  clerk  of  the  county  court  "shall,  at 
the  end  of  each  month,  file  with  the  county  court  a  report 
of  all  fees  .  .  .  ." 

House  Bill  No.  867,  Section  7,  lines  5,  6,  and  7  provides, 
that  the  county  clerk  "shall,  at  the  end  of  each  month,  file 
with  the  county  court  a  report  of  all  fees  charged  and  collected 
during  said  month,  .  .  .  ,"  which  provision  is  in  conflict 
with  Section  11  of  House  Bill  No.  857.  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  768,  which  provides  for  salaries 
of  county  clerks  in  counties  of  the  fourth  class,  in,  Section  7 
thereof,  lines  4,  5,  6,  and  7,  provides  that  "such  clerks  shall, 
at  the  end  of  each  month,  file  with  the  county  court  a  report 
of  all  fees  charged  and  collected  during  said  month,  .  .  ,  ." 
This  provision  conflicts  with  Section  11  of  House  Bill  No.  857. 

In  other  words,  House  Bill  No.  857  conflicts  with  all  of 
the  county  clerks  salary  bills  which  have  been  enacted  and 
also  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  913 
which  is  pending  in  the  House. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  this  bill- 
Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  149 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

MAY  4,  1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3517-3519 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  4,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my  ap- 
proval, Senate  Committee  Substitute  No.  2  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  353,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  creation  of  a  department  of  the 
State  government  to  be  known  as  the  State  Department 
of  Agriculture  and  to  prescribe  its  powers  and  duties;  to 
provide  for  the  appointment  of  a  commissioner  of  said 
department  and  to  prescribe  his  qualifications,  powers, 
duties,  compensation  and  tenure  of  office;  to  provide  for 
the  transfer  to  said  department  and  all  powers  and  duties 
heretofore  conferred  and  imposed  upon  the  Commissioner 
of  Agriculture,  and  upon  the  Missouri  Grain  Warehouse 
Department  and  the  Grain  Warehouse  Commissioner  and 
upon  the  Missouri  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  at 
Columbia  and  the  Director  of  said  experiment  station  by 
Article  14,  Chapter  102  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939;  abolishing  the  Missouri  Grain  Warehouse 
Department  and  the  office  of  Grain  Warehouse  Commis- 
sioner; to  create  a  separate  division  within  said  depart- 
ment to  be  known  as  the  Grain  Warehouse  Division,  and 
to  prescribe  the  qualifications,  powers,  duties,  compen- 
sation and  tenure  of  office  of  the  head  of  said  division; 
to  create  a  separate  division  within  said  department  to 
be  known  as  Animal  Health  Division,  and  to  prescribe 
the  qualifications,  powers,  duties,  compensation  and  ten- 
ure of  office  of  the  head  of  said  division;  to  provide  a 
method  for  removal  of  the  Commissioner  of  [or]  Directors; 


150  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

and  to  repeal  all  other  laws  and  parts  of  laws  inconsistent 
with  the  provisions  of  this  Act." 

Section  2  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  No.  2  for  Sen- 
ate Bill  No.  353,  lines  1  to  7,  inclusive,  provides  for  the  ap- 
pointment of  a  Commissioner  of  the  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture by  the  Governor  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent  of 
the  Senate,  and  said  Commissioner  shall  serve  at  the  pleasure 
of  the  Governor  from  and  after  his  appointment  and  confirma- 
tion, unless  removed  for  cause.  Although  said  section  pro- 
vides that  the  Commissioner  shall  serve  at  the  pleasure  of 
the  Governor,  Section  9,  page  8,  provides  that  the  Governor 
may  remove  the  Commissioner  for  inefficiency,  neglect  of  duty 
or  misconduct  in  office,  first  giving  to  such  officer  a  copy  of 
the  charges  against  him  and  an  opportunity  of  being  publicly 
heard  in  person  and  by  counsel  in  his  own  defense  upon  not 
less  than  ten  days'  notice  of  the  time  and  place  of  such  hearing. 
These  two  sections  are  in  conflict  with  each  other. 

The  Constitution  provides  (Section  17,  Article  IV)  "All 
appointive  officers  may  be  removed  by  the  governor  ,  ,  .  ." 
It  is  my  opinion  that  Section  9  of  the  bill  conflicts  with  Sec- 
tion 17,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution,  and  that  Section  2  of 
the  bill  is  more  nearly  in  conformity  with  the  provisions  of 
the  Constitution.  However,  the  Constitution  merely  says  that 
appointive  officers  may  be  removed  by  the  Governor.  The 
words  "removed  for  cause"  are  not  used  in  the  Constitution, 

Senate  Committee  Substitute  No.  2  for  Senate  Bill  No. 
353  sets  up  within  the  Department  of  Agriculture  two  divi- 
sions with  virtually  independent  administrative  authority — 
the  Grain  Warehouse  Department,  in  Section  7,  page  5,  and 
the  Division  of  Animal  Health  in  Section  8,  page  7.  There 
are  a  number  of  divisions  in  the  Department  of  Agriculture: 
the  Entomology  Division;  Seed  Division;  Feed  Division;  Live 
Stock  Division;  Dairy  Division;  Division  of  State  Fair,  all  in 
addition  to  the  Veterinary  Division.  If  the  Animal  Health 
Division  is  set  up,  in  accordance  with  this  bill,  then  surely 
the  Dairy  Division  is  deserving  of  recognition,  or  the  Feed 
Division,  or  any  of  the  other  divisions  for  that  matter.  I  do 
n,ot  believe  that  one  division  within  a  department  should  be 
glorified  over  another.  There  should  be  no  conflict  of  author- 
ity within  a  department 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  151 

In  Section  3  the  Commissioner  of  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  is  given  over-all  authority  of  the  Department  of 
Agriculture.  However,  in  Section  8,  paragraph  "c",  page  8, 
of  the  bill,  the  director  of  Animal  Health  is  given  full  charge 
of  the  veterinary  services  of  the  State  and  in  addition  "he 
shall  have  all  the  powers,  duties  and  responsibilities  hereto- 
fore conferred  and  imposed  upon  the  State  Veterinarian  under 
the  provisions  of  Article  11,  Chapter  102,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939."  While  it  is  true  that  in  Section  8a,  line  5, 
page  7,  the  director  of  Animal  Health  is  under  the  supervision 
of  the  Commissioner,  I  think  there  is  no  question  but  what 
there  is  a  conflict  of  authority  between  Section  8a  and 
Section  8c. 

Section  4,  page  4,  seems  to  be  a  gratuitous  section  for 
the  reason  that  the  relations  between  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  and  the  College  of  Agriculture  of  the  University 
of  Missouri  have  been  harmonious  for  practically  seventy 
years.  This  section  could  be  so  construed  as  to  prohibit  the 
Department  of  Agriculture  from  cooperating  with  any  other 
agency,  State  or  Federal,  except  the  College  of  Agriculture 
of  the  University  of  Missouri. 

Section  7a,  page  5,  seeks  to  transfer  the  Grain  Warehouse 
Department  to  the  Department  of  Agriculture.  I  have  no 
objection  to  such  transfer.  However,  this  section  undertakes 
to  do  more  than  that.  In  lines  4  to  10,  inclusive,  of  Section 
7a  there  is  this  provision:  ",  .  .  the  Grain  Warehouse 
Commissioner  shall  continue  as  head  of  said  division  until  April 
15,  1947  and  shall  have  the  same  rights,  powers,  duties,  tenure 
of  office  and  compensation  now  provided  for  the  Grain  Ware- 
house Commissioner  and  until  a  director  of  said  division  is 
appointed,  confirmed,  and  qualified  pursuant  to  the  provisions 
of  this  act,  unless  removed  for  cause." 

The  Legislative  branch  of  the  government  has  no  author- 
ity whatsoever  to  appoint  a  particular  person  to  an  office,  or 
to  provide  that  a  certain  officer  shall  continue  as  head  of  a 
division  of  a  department  of  State  government  until  April  15* 
1947,  or  any  other  date.  Our  State  government  is  divided 
into  three  distinct  departments:  the  Legislative,  Executive, 
and  Judicial.  Each  department  has  separate  duties  and  func- 
tions which  are  prescribed  by  the  Constitution.  One  depart- 
ment shall  not  exercise  any  power  properly  belonging  to  the 


152  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

other  unless  the  Constitution  expressly  authorizes  it.  There 
is  no  constitutional  authority  authorizing  the  Legislative 
Department  to  appoint  any  particular  person  to  office,  or  to 
continue  any  particular  person  in  office.  That  is  a  duty  that 
is  wholly  within  the  power  of  the  Executive  Department. 
When  the  Legislative  Department  undertakes  to  appoint  a 
particular  person  to  office,  or  to  designate  a  certain  person  to 
continue  in  office  until  April  15,  1947,  or  any  other  date,  then 
the  Legislative  Department  usurps  the  power  and  authority 
of  the  Executive  Department  and  is  acting  wholly  outside  the 
scope  of  the  Constitution.  As  was  said  by  the  Supreme 
Court  of  Missouri  in  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  v.  St.  Louis, 
216  Mo.  47,  1.  c.  96: 

"That  section  .  .  .  expressly  authorizes  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  acting  within  its  legislative  capacity,  to 
pass  a  law  prescribing  the  manner  in  which  an  appoint- 
ment shall  be  made,  but  it  does  not  authorize  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  to  make  the  appointment  itself,  .... 
To  provide  by  law  the  manner  in  which  an  appointment 
shall  be  made  is  one  thing;  to  make  the  appointment  is 
another;  the  one  is  in  its  nature  legislative,  the  other  is 
essentially  executive.  The  Constitution  authorizes  the 
Legislature  to  do  the  one  but  not  the  other  .  .  .  ," 

In  said  Section  7a,  page  5,  line  8,  the  word  "confirmed" 
is  used  in  referring  to  a  director  of  the  Grain  Warehouse 
Division.  In  Section  7b,  lines  11  and  12,  the  director  of  the 
Grain  Warehouse  Division  shall  be  appointed  by  the  Com- 
missioner. There  is  no  provision  in  the  bill  providing  that 
the  director  shall  be  confirmed.  In  fact,  no  appointee  can  be 
confirmed  except  those  appointed  by  the  Governor  by  and 
with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate, 

Section  7a,  page  5,  lines  5,  6,  and  7,  provides  that  the 
Grain  Warehouse  Commissioner  shall  have  the  same  rights, 
powers,  duties,  tenure  of  office,  and  compensation  now  pro- 
vided for  the  Warehouse  Commissioner,  etc.  Section  7c,  lines 
24  to  28,  inclusive,  provides  that  the  director  of  the  Grain 
Warehouse  Division  shall,  with  the  approval  of  the  Commis- 
sioner, appoint  and  fix  the  compensation  of  such  clerks,  stenog- 
raphers, inspectors,  and  other  employees  necessary  for  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  153 

proper  execution  of  his  duties.  It  is  not  clear  in  the  bill  as 
to  the  status  of  the  employees  of  the  Grain  Warehouse  Depart- 
ment if  they  should  come  into  the  Department  of  Agriculture 
as  a  new  division. 

For  the  reasons  hereinabove  set  forth  I  cannot  approve 
this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

MAY  11,  1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  4163-41&5 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  11,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No, 
815,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  create  a  county  court;  provide  for  county  court 
districts,  for  the  election,  appointment,  commission,  term 
of  office,  and  qualifications  of  judges  of  the  county  courts; 
provide  certain  powers  and  duties  of  the  county  courts; 
provide  terms,  procedure,  and  for  judicial  reviews  of  pro- 
ceedings in  the  county  courts;  prohibit  judges  of  the 
county  courts  from  contracting  with  the  county  and  do- 
ing certain  other  acts,  and  fixing  penalties  for  the  viola- 
tion, thereof;  and  to  repeal  Section  2474  of  Article  13, 
Chapter  10,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as 
amended  by  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  Mis- 
souri, known  as  House  Bill  No.  708,  approved  December 


154  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

19,  1945,  relating  to  county  courts,  their  organization  and 
districting  of  counties  into  county  court  districts;  and  to 
repeal  Sections  2475  to  2497,  both  inclusive,  of  the  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  the  said  Section  2474 
and  Sections  2475  to  2497,  both  inclusive,  constituting 
the  entire  Article  13,  Chapter  10,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  county  courts,  their  organization, 
powers,  procedure,  appeals,  and  related  matters." 

Section  1,  page  2,  lines  6  to  9,  inclusive,  of  House  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  815,  provides  that  each 
<couHty  shall  be  districted  by  the  county  court  into  two  dis- 
tricts as  nearly  equal  in  population  as  practicable,  without 
•dividing  municipal  townships.  In  lines  11  to  17  of  the  same 
•section  of  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
815  it  is  provided  further  "that  in  each  county  of  the  second, 
third  and  fourth  class,  where  the  population  of  any  one  dis- 
trict varies  from  pne-half  the  population  of  such  county  by 
more  than  one-fourth  thereof,  the  county  court  shall  redistrict 
such  county  court  districts  as  herein  provided  except  that  in 
such  counties  municipal  townships  may  be  divided."  (Under- 
scoring mine.) 

It  is  my  opinion,  that  from  the  wording  of  the  above  pro- 
vision it  is  impossible  to  determine  whether  the  variation  of 
one-fourth,  which  is  referred  to,  is  from  one-half  the  popula- 
tion of  such  county  or  from  the  total  population  of  such 
county.  I  believe  that  this  constitutes  a  serious  ambiguity 
in  this  provision  of  Section  1  of  House  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  815. 

Furthermore,  the  effect  of  allowing  municipal  townships 
to  be  divided  in  any  county  would,  in  my  opinion,  allow  the 
voters  of  the  divided  township  to  vote  for  either  of  the  county 
judges  who  are  to  be  elected  from  the  two  districts.  This 
would  be  true  since  the  voters  of  any  divided  township  could 
vote  in  any  precinct  within  that  township  and  would  thus  not 
be  restricted  to  voting  in  the  county  court  district  in  which 
they  lived.  Section  11469,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  as  amended  by  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  555,  relat- 
ing to  the  qualifications  of  voters  provides:  ".  ,  *  each 

shall  vote  only  in  the  township  in  which  he  resides  .  . .  .** 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  155 

In  construing  Section  4748,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1919,  which  section  is  now  Section  11469,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended,  the  Supreme  Court  of 
Missouri  in  State  v.  Pearson,  288  Missouri,  103  said,  1.  c.  107: 

'The  statute  does  not  require  that  he  shall  live  in  the 
precinct  in  which  he  voted,  but  only  that  he  shall  vote 
in  the  township  in  which  he  resides." 

Therefore,  as  stated  above,  a  voter  could  vote  in  any  precinct 
in  the  township  in  which  he  resides.  In  my  opinion  the  pro- 
vision in  Section  1  of  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  815,  allowing  municipal  townships  to  be  divided,  is 
unworkable  without  a  change  in  the  election  laws. 

The  proviso  on  page  2  of  the  bill,  lines  11  to  17,  inclusive, 
applies  in  counties  of  the  second,  third,  and  fourth  class.  It 
does  not  apply  in  counties  of  the  first  class.  It  is  my  opinion 
that  it  would  be  impractical  and  unworkable  to  divide  town- 
ships in  the  smaller  rural  counties  of  the  third  and  fourth 
classes.  If  townships  are  to  be  divided  I  see  no  occasion  to 
exempt  counties  of  the  first  class. 

Section  2,  page  2,  of  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  815  provides  for  the  election  of  the  presiding 
and  associate  judges  of  the  county  court.  In  lines  2  and  3 
of  Section  2,  the  election  applies  "in  all  counties  of  this  State." 
In  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  509,  there  is  a  section  per- 
taining to  the  election  of  judges  of  the  county  court  in  coun- 
ties of  not  less  than  250,000  nor  more  than  450,000  inhabitants. 
This  section  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  509,  should  be 
repealed  in  order  to  comply  with  the  new  classification  of 
counties. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  on  page  3,  Section  2> 
lines  17,  18,  19,  and  20,  it  provides  that  "Each  judge  of  the 
county  court  elected  or  appointed  under  the  provisions  of  this 
act  shall  enter  upon  the  duties  of  his  office  on  the  1st  day  of 
January  next  after  his  election  .  .  .  ."  The  words  "or 
appointed"  evidently  should  be  stricken  out,  for  if  a  judge  is 
appointed  to  fill  a  vacancy  his  appointment  would  become 
effective  immediately  and  he  would  not  have  to  wait  until  the 
first  day  of  January  to  assume  the  duties  of  his  office.  The 
words  "or  appointed"  in  line  18  are  confusing. 


156  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  Section  6,  page  3,  line  8,  the  words  "or  appointed" 
should  be  inserted  after  the  word  "elected"  and  before  the 
word  "and"  to  make  said  section  comply  with  Section  4, 
Article  IV,  Constitution  of  1945. 

House  Bill  No.  708,  enacted  by  the  63rd  General  Assem- 
bly and  approved  December  19,  1945,  was  enacted  for  the 
purpose  of  complying  with  Section  7,  Article  VI  of  the  Con- 
stitution of  1945.  The  words  "of  whom  the  probate  judge 
may  be  one"  in  Section  2474,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  were  stricken  out  by  House  Bill  No.  708.  In  my  opinion 
House  Bill  No.  708  meets  the  requirements  of  Section  7,  Arti- 
cle VI  of  the  1945  Constitution,  and  there  is  no  need  to  repeal  it. 
If  counties  want  to  frame  and  adopt  their  own  charters  or 
adopt  an  alternative  form  of  county  government  they  can  do 
so  without  conflicting  with  the  provisions  of  Section  2474  of 
House  Bill  No.  708. 

The  other  sections  in  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  815  with  few  exceptions  are  the  same  as  the 
present  sections  in  Article  13,  Chapter  10,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  pertaining  to  county  courts.  There  is  noth- 
ing contained  in  House  Committtee  Substitute  for  House  Bill 
No.  815  which  is  essential  to  the  adequate  and  proper  function- 
ing of  the  county  courts  of  this  State  or  which  is  necessary 
under  the  Constitution.  In  view  of  the  ambiguous  and  un- 
workable provisions  in  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  815  I  believe  the  present  laws  pertaining  to  county 
courts  would  be  more  practical  and  workable  than  to  approve 
this  bill,  and  for  that  reason  I  am  vetoing  it, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  157 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  ike  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  £525-4527 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  922,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  12986,  Article  2,  Chapter  85, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  con- 
tingent fund  for  the  prosecuting  attorney  in  counties  of 
100,000  to  400,000  inhabitants,  and  to  repeal  Section 
13470,  Article  4,  Chapter  99,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  the  contingent  fund  of  the  pros- 
ecuting attorney  in  counties  containing  a  population  of 
350,000  to  750,000  inhabitants,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  there- 
of a  new  section  relating  to  the  contingent  fund  of  the 
prosecuting  attorney  in  Class  1  counties,  to  be  known  as 
Section  12986." 

House  Bill  No.  922  in  Section  12986,  lines  1  to  5  inclusive, 
provides: 

"In  all  counties  of  Class  1  there  shall  be  set  aside  annually 
by  the  county  clerk  of  such  county  in  January  of  each 
year  a  contingent  fund  in  the  amount  of  $3,000  for  the 
use  of  the  office  of  the  prosecuting  attorney  of  such 
county,  .  .  .  ."  (underscoring  mine) 

It  is  my  opinion  that  county  clerks  in  counties  of  the 
first  class,  or  any  other  class,  are  without  authority  to  set 
aside  a  contingent  fund  in  any  amount  without  the  specific 
action  of  the  county  court. 

Section  7  of  Article  VI  of  the  Constitution  of  1945, 
provides: 


158  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"In  each  county  not  framing  and  adopting  its  own  charter 
or  adopting  an  alternative  form  of  county  government, 
there  shall  be  elected  a  court  of  three  members  which 
shall  manage  all  county  business  as  prescribed  by  law,  and 
keep  an  accurate  record  of  its  proceedings.  The  voters 
of  any  county  may  reduce  the  number  of  members  to 
one  or  two  as  provided  by  law."  (underscoring  mine) 

The  underlined  portions  of  this  section  very  closely  resemble 
Section  36  of  Article  VI  of  the  Constitution  of  1875,  the  per- 
tinent part  of  which  read:  ".  .  .  shall  have  jurisdiction  to 
transact  all  county  and  such  other  business  .  .  .  ." 

Concerning  Section  36  of  Article  VI  of  the  Constitution 
of  1875  our  Supreme  Court  in  State  ex  rel.  Buckner  vs.  Mc- 
Elroy,  309  Mo.  595,  1.  c.  608,  said: 

"The  gist  of  this  case  hovers  around  Section  36  of  Article 
VI  of  the  Missouri  Constitution  for  1875.  This  section 
reads:  'In  each  county  there  shall  be  a  county  court, 
which  shall  be  a  court  of  record,  and  shall  have  juris- 
diction to  transact  all^  county  and  such  other  business  as 
may  be  prescribed  by  law.  .  .  .  Likewise  we  find  the 
power  to  sell  property  belonging  to  the  county,  and  to 
audit  and  settle  all  demands  against  the  county.  Much 
of  this  section  has  stood  for  many  years,  and  is  and 
was  a  legislative  construction  of  the  Constitution  when 
it  speaks  of  transacting  county  business.  .  .  ."  (under- 
scoring mine) 

And  on  page  610  the  decision  approves  the  language  of 
an  Oregon  case,  as  follows: 

"  'County  business,'  within  Article  VII,  Section,  11,  12,. 
of  the  Constitution,  authorizing  the  Legislature  to  pro- 
vide for  the  election  of  two  commissioners  to  sit  with  the 
county  judge  while  transacting  county  business,  and  the 
statute  providing  for  the  election  of  two  persons  to  sit 
with  the  county  judge  in  the  transaction  of  county  busi- 
ness, means  all  business  pertaining  to  the  county  as  a 
corporate  entity,  and  the  Legislature  may  neither  limit 
nor  extend  the  operation  of  the  Constitution,  and  a  pro- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  159 

ceeding  to  create  a  new  county  out  of  territory  of  an 
existing  county  is  county  business," 

That  the  expenditures  contemplated  by  the  above-men- 
tioned House  Bill  No.  922  constitute  "county  business,"  within 
the  meaning  of  this  constitutional  provision,  has  been  deter- 
mined by  our  Supreme  Court  in  another  case,  Graves  v.  Pur- 
cell,  85  S.  W.  (2d)  543,  a  decision  by  the  Supreme  Court  En 
Bane.  In  that  case  the  County  Budget  Law,  particularly 
those  sections  relating  to  the  estimate  of  expenditures  sub- 
mitted by  the  circuit  clerk,  were  under  attack  on  the  ground 
that  they  violated  the  provisions  of  the  constitutional  pro- 
vision directing  that  county  courts  transact  all  county  business. 
In  denying  this  contention,  the  court  stated,  1.  c.  550: 

".  .  .  We  do  not  think  that  the  section  of  the  act 
here  complained  of  grants  to  the  circuit  court  or  to  the 
circuit  clerk  any  power  to  expend  money,  but  merely  pro. 
vides  for  the  payment  to  the  court  and  its  clerk  of  such 
expenditures  as  under  existing  law  the  court  and  its  clerk 
may  be  entitled  to  make  and  which  are  chargeable  to 
the  county.  .  .  ."  (underscoring  mine) 

In  interpreting  the  words  "county  business,"  a  Texas 
Court  of  Civil  Appeals  in  Glenn  v.  Dallas  County  Bois  D'Arc 
Island  Levee  Dist.,  275  S.  W.  137,  1.  c.  145,  stated: 

'*.  .  .  Within  the  meaning  of  the  Constitution  creating 
and  conferring  jurisdiction  upon  commissioners'  courts, 
we  think  it  is  proper  to  give  to  the  term  'county  business' 
a  broad  and  liberal  construction  so  as  not  to  defeat  the 
real  purpose  that  was  intended  to  be  accomplished  by 
the  law  in  providing  that  the  commissioners'  court  shall 
exercise  such  power  and  jurisdiction  over  all  county  busi- 
ness as  is  conferred  by  the  Constitution  and  the  laws  of 
the  state,  or  as  may  be  hereafter  prescribed,  .  .  .  ." 

In  view  of  Section  7,  Article  VI  of  the  Constitution  of 
1945  and  the  foregoing  decisions,  it  is  plain  that  expenditure 
of  the  sum  of  $3,000.00  by  setting  it  aside  for  the  use  of  the 
office  of  the  prosecuting  attorney  clearly  constitutes  "county 
business"  within  the  meaning  of  Section  7  of  Article  VI  of 


160  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  Constitution  of  1945  and  would  therefore  be  an  act  which 
could  be  performed  only  by  the  county  court  itself  and  would 
be  an  unwarranted  attempt  to  delegate  power  to  the  clerk  of 
said  court. 

I  am  therefore  of  the  opinion  that  the  county  clerk  is 
without  authority  to  set  aside  the  sum  of  $3,000.00  for  the 
use  of  the  prosecuting  attorney  in  counties  of  the  first  class 
without  action  of  the  county  court  of  the  county  concerned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
JULY  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  4140-4-141 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  (STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  10,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bills  Nos* 
33,  34,  35,  36,  37,  38,  and  39,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  11939,  11940,  11942,  11944, 
11945,  11949  and  11952,  Article  19,  Chapter  76,  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  1939,  relating  to  registra- 
tion and  elections  in  all  cities  of  this  State  which  now  con- 
tain or  may  hereafter  contain  ten  thousand  inhabitants 
and  less  than  thirty  thousand  inhabitants,  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  seven  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same 
subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  11939,  11940* 
11942,  11944,  11945,  11949  and  11952." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  161 

This  Senate  Committee  Substitute  was  originally  seven 
separate  bills.  Each  bill  dealt  with  a  section  of  the  Statutes. 
However,  all  of  said  bills  were  consolidated  into  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  Senate  Bills  Numbers  33  to  39  inclusive. 

Section  11939  of  this  Substitute  makes  only  one  change 
in  the  present  law  and  that  is  in  lines  6  to  12  inclusive,  page 
2,  where  two  registrars  of  election  are  provided  for  instead  of 
one  as  in  the  present  law.  Said  two  registrars  are  to  be  elected 
from  the  two  political  parties  casting  the  highest  number  of 
votes  for  Governor  at  the  last  preceding  State  election.  I  have 
no  specific  objection  to  this  change  and  if  this  section  were 
in  a  separate  bill  I  would  approve  it. 

Section  11940,  page  3,  of  this  Substitute  changes  the  pres- 
ent law  with  reference  to  the  city  clerk.  It  takes  away  his 
duties  as  an  ex-officio  member  of  the  board  of  registrars  but 
leaves  him  as  the  custodian  of  the  registration  books  and  as 
secretary  of  the  board  of  registrars.  There  is  no  legitimate 
reason  why  the  city  clerk  should  not  be  an  ex-officio  member 
of  the  board  of  registrars.  The  city  clerk  is  on  duty  at  his 
office  on  the  usual  business  days  and  at  the  regular  office 
hours  and  it  is  a  convenience  to  the  voter  to  be  able  to  register 
at  the  office  of  the  city  clerk  at  any  time  during  the  year  as 
provided  for  in  Section  11949,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939. 

Section  11942  makes  only  one  change  and  that  is  in  line 
7  wherein  the  words  "or  the  ex-officio  member"  are  not  in- 
cluded in  this  section.  This  is  in  accordance  with  the  pro- 
vision in  Section  11940  in  taking  away  the  duties  of  the  city 
clerk  as  ex-officio  member  of  the  board. 

Section  11944  makes  a  specific  provision  in  lines  3  to  8 
inclusive,  page  4,  that  the  days  of  registration  shall  be  the 
first  and  third  Mondays  of  the  two  months  immediately  pre- 
ceding the  month  in  which  any  special  or  municipal,  or  pri- 
mary, State,  county,  or  city  election  may  be  held  in  the  city. 
This  provision  specifically  limits  the  days  for  registration  to 
those  four  days  in  those  two  months. 

Section  11945  has  a  new  provision  found  in  lines  9  to  13 
inclusive,  page  5,  wherein  it  is  provided  that  when  any  person 
has  changed  his  domicile  to  a  precinct  or  ward  other  than  the 
one  in  which  he  is  legally  registered,  such  person  shall  not 
be  qualified  to  vote  in  the  precinct  or  ward  from  which  he 


162  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

has  moved  his  domicile.  In  other  words,  if  a  person  moved 
from  one  precinct  to  another  and  did  not  register  on  one  of 
the  four  days  provided  for  in  Section  11944  he  would  be  barred 
from  voting  because  this  provision,  in  Section  11945  would 
prohibit  him  from  voting  in  the  precinct  or  ward  from  which 
he  was  registered,  although  he  is  a  legal  resident  of  the  city 
but  merely  had  moved  from  one  precinct  to  another  and  did 
not  register  on  one  of  the  four  days  mentioned  in  Section 
11944.  If  a  citizen  moves  from  one  precinct  to  another  after 
the  registration  books  are  closed  he  will  be  prevented  from 
voting  at  the  election  unless  he  would  be  able  to  obtain,  an 
order  from  a  judge  of  the  circuit  court. 

Section  11949  omits  a  provision  from  the  present  law 
which  I  think  is  very  important  in  the  registration  laws  of 
cities  of  this  class  and  also  is  a  great  convenience  to  the  citizens. 
The  present  law  provides: 

"Section  11949.  Registration  shall  be  conducted  at 
the  office  of  the  clerk  of  the  board,  throughout  the  entire 
year,  except  as  herein  provided,  upon  the  usual  business 
days,  and  at  the  regular  office  hours,  and  at  additional 
hours,  at  the  discretion  of  the  board.  The  board  may 
also  provide  for  and  give  notice  of  other  places  of  regis- 
tration, as  in  its  judgment  the  best  interests  of  the  service 
require,  which  places  shall  be  open,  for  registration  at 
such  times  as  the  board  may  direct." 

In  other  words,  if  an  eligible  voter  has  failed  to  register 
on  one  of  the  days  mentioned  in  the  present  law  he  still  has 
the  opportunity  under  this  provision  in  Section  11949  to  reg- 
ister at  the  office  of  the  clerk  of  the  board.  Under  the  present 
law  the  clerk  of  the  board  is  an  ex-officio  member  of  the  board 
and  has  the  authority  to  register  a  voter  at  any  time  prior 
to  ten  days  before  the  election.  However,  under  this  Com- 
mittee  Substitute  the  clerk  is  no  longer  an  ex~officio  member 
of  the  board  and  therefore  has  no  authority  to  register  a  voter. 
The  net  result  is  that  if  an  eligible  voter  failed  to  register  on 
one  of  the  four  days  mentioned  in  Section  11944  then  he  is 
barred  from  voting  except  by  an  order  of  a  judge  of  the  cir- 
cuit court.  Not  every  city  of  the  class  affected  (10,000  to 
30,000)  has  a  circuit  judge  residing  in  the  city  who  is  avail- 
able for  the  purpose  of  registering  voters.  In  my  opinion  this 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  163 

would  prevent  many  eligible  persons  from  voting  because  they 
would  be  unable  to  register.  Registration  laws  should  not  be 
so  written  as  to  make  it  difficult  for  qualified  voters  to  register. 

Of  course  there  is  a  provision  in  Section  11949,  which 
also  is  in  the  present  law,  providing  that  a  person  who  has 
been  unable  to  register  may  appear  before  two  judges  of  elec- 
tion in  the  precinct  where  the  voter  resides  and  said  judges 
shall  have  the  authority  to  register  such  voters.  From  a  prac- 
tical standpoint  this  is  unworkable  and  anyone  familiar  with 
elections  knows  that  it  is  unworkable  and  that  but  few  voters 
could  be  registered  on  the  day  of  election  because  the  judges 
are  too  busy  with  their  duties  as  election  judges.  The  result 
will  be  that  voters  who  are  in  all  respects  qualified  to  vote  in 
the  election  will  be  prohibited  from  voting  because  they  were 
unable  to  register. 

If  the  above  quoted  provision  of  Section  11949,  which  is 
now  in  the  present  law,  had  been  included  in  this  bill  I  would 
be  inclined  to  approve  this  bill,  but  with  this  provision  of  the 
present  law  omitted  and  the  registration  limited  to  four  days 
as  provided  for  in  Section  11944,  I  do  not  think  this  Com- 
mittee Substitute  should  become  a  law. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  am  unable  to  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

AUGUST  1,  1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  £705-470? 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  1,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  989,  entitled: 


164  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  to  pay  the  salaries,  wages 
and  per  diem  and  other  expenses  of  the  Civil  Officers  and 
employees  and  of  other  departments  and  agencies  of  the 
State  Government  as  follows:  the  Executive  Offices,  the 
Secretary  of  State,  the  State  Auditor,  the  State  Treas- 
urer, the  Attorney-General,  Supreme  Court,  St.  Louis 
Court  of  Appeals,  Kansas  City  Court  of  Appeals,  Spring- 
field Court  of  Appeals,  Circuit  and  Common  Pleas  Court 
Judges,  Special  Judges,  the  Judicial  Conference,  magis- 
trates, the  Department  of  Business  and  Administration, 
the  Department  of  Conservation,  the  Highway  Depart- 
ment, the  Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations, 
the  Department  of  Agriculture,  the  State  Highway  Patrol, 
the  Supervisor  of  Liquor  Control,  the  Adjutant-General, 
the  Missouri  Military  Forces,  the  State  Service  Officer, 
the  Children's  Code  Commission  and  Missouri's  partici- 
pation in  the  Council  of  State  Governments;  for  the  period 
beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June  30,  1947." 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  greater  part  of  the  appropria- 
tion in  Section  4,051  should  have  been  made  to  the  Comptroller 
instead  of  the  State  Auditor.  The  greater  part  of  the  duties 
formerly  performed  by  the  Auditor  for  the  State  Highway 
Department,  for  which  this  appropriation  is  made,  are  now 
performed  by  the  Comptroller,  However,  the  General  Assem- 
bly may  not  have  appropriated  sufficient  funds  for  the  Comp- 
troller to  carry  out  his  duties  and  it  is  very  likely  that  the 
Comptroller  will  have  to  use  employees  of  the  State  Auditor 
for  this  particular  work.  If  so,  this  appropriation  for  personal 
service  should  be  available  for  that  purpose, 

I  am  of  the  opinion  that  $10,000,00  of  the  appropriation 
for  personal  service  probably  will  be  sufficient;  however,  I  am 
approving  the  amount  set  out  in  the  bill,  $35,000,00  for  per- 
sonal service,  with  the  understanding  that  I  will  control  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  165 

expenditure  of  $25,000.00  of  this  amount  by  allotment  upon 
proof  that  any  portion  of  the  $25,000.00  is  necessary  for  the 
Comptroller  and  Auditor  to  carry  out  the  purpose  of  this 
section. 

I  have  discussed  this  matter  with  the  Comptroller  and  the 
State  Auditor  and  they  agree  to  handle  the  appropriation  in 
this  manner. 

I  call  attention  to  Section  4.390,  page  61,  lines  7  to  10, 
inclusive,  wherein  the  salaries,  wages,  and  per  diem  of  the 
officers  and  employees  and  other  expenses  of  the  Commis- 
sioner of  the  State  Department  of  Agriculture  are  appropriated 
"in  the  administration  of  an  Act  of  the  63rd  General  Assem- 
bly, Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  305;  for  the  period  begin- 
ning July  1,  1946  and  ending  June  30,  1947." 

There  is  no  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1945,  page  305.  In  fact  the  Laws  of  Missouri  for 
1945  have  not  been  printed.  It  was  evidently  the  intention 
of  the  General  Assembly  to  refer  to  an  act  of  the  61st  General 
Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  305,  as  there  is  such 
an  act  in  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  at  page  305,  providing 
for  apple  merchandising  fees,  an  apple  merchandising  fund, 
and  also  other  provisions.  However,  several  sections  of  that 
act  were  repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  109  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  which  has  been  passed  and 
approved. 

Section  23,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1945 
provides: 

".  .  .  Every  appropriation  law  shall  distinctly  specify 
the  amount  and  purpose  of  the  appropriation  without 
reference  to  any  other  law  to  fix  the  amount  or  purpose.*' 

This  section  (4.390)  of  the  appropriation  bill  refers  to 
another  law  to  fix  the  purpose,  to  wit:  the  act  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page 
305,  but  as  above  stated,  there  is  no  such  act  but  if  there 
were  it  still  would  be  an  incorrect  way  to  state  the  purpose 
of  the  appropriation  in  view  of  the  above  constitutional 
provision. 

The  State  Treasurer  has  no  authority  to  pay  out  public 
funds  on  a  guess  or  speculation  as  to  the  purposes  of  an 
appropriation  act. 


166  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

For  the  reasons  herein  stated  I  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation of  $10,000.00  set  forth  in  Section  4,390  and  therefore 
said  amount  is  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

AUGUST  7, 1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  4148-4149 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  7, 1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  301,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  10346,  10353,  10357,  10367, 
10370,  10374,  10387,  10390,  10392,  10393,  and  10397,  of 
Article  II,  Chapter  72,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939;  also  an  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly  approved 
August  9,  1941,  pages  547-548,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941; 
also  an  act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly  approved  Au- 
gust 2,  1943,  page  909,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943;  relating 
to  all  classes  of  schools  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  thir- 
teen new  sections  to  be  known  as  Sections  10327a,  10327bf 
10346,  10353,  10357,  10364a,  10367,  10374,  10390,  10392, 
10393,  and  10397,  relating  to  the  same  general  subject 
matter,  giv  ng  to  the  State  Board  of  Education,  and  the 
State  Commissioner  of  Education  certain  powers  and 
duties  heretofore  vested  in  the  State  Superintendent  of 
Public  Schools/' 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  167 

Senate  Bill  No.  301  in  the  title  thereof  states  that  it  is 
an  act  to  repeal  fourteen  sections  of  the  1939  Statutes,  includ- 
ing two  sections  of  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  pages  547  and 
548,  and  also  one  section  of  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page 
909,  and  enacting  in  lieu  thereof  thirteen  new  sections.  How- 
ever, there  are  only  twelve  sections  set  out  in  the  title.  This 
same  error  appears  in  Section  1  of  the  bill. 

In  the  title  and  also  in  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No.  301, 
Section  10387  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  is 
repealed.  No  section  is  enacted  in  lieu  thereof.  This  is  one 
of  the  sections  that  pertains  to  the  foreclosure  of  school  fund 
mortgages.  In  the  case  of  Murphy  vs.  Butler  County,  352 
Missouri  1082,  1.  c.  1085,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Missouri  said: 

"The  requirements  for  foreclosure  of  School  Fund 
mortgages  are  set  out  in  Sections  10385  and  10387." 

The  Supreme  Court  also  held  in  said  case,  1.  c.  1085: 

"The  order  of  sale  required  by  Section  10387  is  essential 
to  a  valid  sale."  Citing  Benton  County  vs.  Morgan,  163 
Missouri  661. 

Section  10385  was  amended  by  an  act  of  the  62nd  General 
Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri,  page  880.  However,  the  amend- 
ment merely  added  another  condition  that  should  be  included 
in  the  form  of  mortgage.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  Sections 
10385  and  10387  are  the  two  sections  which  provide  for  the 
foreclosure  of  school  fund  mortgages,  it  is  my  opinion  that 
Section  10387  should  not  be  repealed.  This  is  especially  true 
in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  Supreme  Court  has  held  in  the 
above  cited  case  of  Murphy  vs.  Butler  County,  that  the  order 
of  sale  required  in  said  section  is  essential  to  a  valid  sale  of 
land  under  a  school  fund  mortgage.  The  Supreme  Court 
decided  the  Murphy  case  as  late  as  June,  1944. 

Section  10370  is  repealed  by  Senate  Bill  No.  301  and  no 
section  enacted  in  lieu  thereof  pertaining  to  the  same  subject 
matter.  I  doubt  the  advisability  of  an  outright  repeal  of  Sec- 
tion 10370.  This  section  pertains  to  a  requirement  that  text- 
books on  physiology,  used  in  the  public  schools  of  Missouri, 
shall  contain  a  chapter  or  chapters  on  dental  hygiene.  I  think 
the  instruction  in  dental  hygiene  atxd  physiology  in  the  public 


168  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

schools  is  of  sufficient  importance  that  the  textbooks  on  these 
subjects  should  contain  a  chapter  or  chapters  concerning  in- 
struction on  prevention  of  defects  and  diseases  of  the  mouth 
and  teeth.  In  re-writing  this  bill  I  suggest  that  the  repealing 
of  Section  10370  be  given  serious  consideration. 

The  remaining  sections  of  Senate  Bill  No.  301  relate  to 
changes  in  the  sections  of  the  school  laws  in  order  to  make 
said  sections  conform  to  the  provisions  of  the  new  Consti- 
tution. These  changes  can  be  made  in  another  bill  without 
seriously  interfering  with  the  operation  of  the  present  laws, 
while  Section  10387  is  of  such  importance  that  I  do  not  believe 
this  bill  should  be  approved  in  its  present  form. 

The  salaries  set  forth  in  Senate  Bill  No.  301  have  been 
approved  in  other  bills. 

I  suggest  that  this  bill  be  re-written  to  conform  to  the 
suggestions  in  this  message. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

AUGUST  8, 1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  4149~4150 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

August  8,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without 
my  approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  331,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  9454,  Article  1,  Chapter  54,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  granting 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  169 

of  certificate  to  applicant  for  pension  and  certifying  the 
same,  by  striking  out  of  the  third  line,  the  ninth  line  and 
the  eighteenth  line  of  said  Section  9454  the  word  'probate' 
and  inserting  in  each  instance  in  lieu  thereof  the  word 
'magistrate',  with  an  effective  date." 

Senate  Bill  No.  331  refers  only  to  one  section  of  the  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  to  wit:  Section  9454.  How- 
ever, this  same  Section  9454  was  repealed  and  reenacted  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  453  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  which  has 
been  passed  and  approved.  The  only  change  that  Senate  Bill 
No.  331  makes  in  Section  9454  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  is  the  word  "probate"  is  stricken  out  in  three 
places  and  the  word  "magistrate"  inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

We  still  have  probate  courts  in  Missouri.  If  there  is  any 
question  about  persons  applying  to  the  probate  court  for  the 
benefits  of  this  article  (pensions  to  the  blind)  they  have  the 
right,  under  Senate  Bill  No.  349,  to  apply  to  the  Division  of 
Welfare  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  for 
the  benefits  referred  to  in  Section  9454,  because  the  duties  of 
the  Missouri  Commission  for  the  Blind  have  been  transferred 
to  and  vested  in  the  Division  of  Welfare  of  the  Department 
of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  by  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly. 

Senate  Bill  No.  331  did  not  change  the  words  "state 
auditor"  in  lines  11  and  18  to  "comptroller."  However,  this 
change  was  made  in  Section  9454  of  Senate  Bill  No.  453.  The 
following  words  in  lines  7  and  8:  "Missouri  commission  for 
the  blind  at  its  office  in  St.  Louis,  Missouri"  should  have  been 
stricken  out  of  Senate  Bill  No.  331  and  the  following  words 
inserted  in  lieu  thereof:  "the  Division  of  Welfare  of  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  at  its  office  in 
Jefferson  City,  Missouri."  In  lines  3  and  4  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  331,  the  words  "to  the  commission  for  the  blind"  should 
have  been  stricken  out  and  the  words  "Division  of  Welfare 
of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare"  inserted  in 
lieu  thereof. 

Because  of  the  errors  in  Senate  Bill  No.  331,  as  herein 
stated,  and  the  fact  that  this  subject  matter  is  included  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  453,  there  is  no  point  in  approving  Senate 
Bill  No.  331. 


170  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Section  9454,  as  s,et  forth  in  Senate 
Bill  No.  453,  should  be  repealed  and  reenacted  so  that  appli- 
cants for  blind  pensions  may  apply  to  the  probate  court  or 
magistrate  court  or  to  the  Division  of  Welfare  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  at  its  office  in  Jefferson 
City,  Missouri,  for  the  benefits  of  this  article. 

For  the  reasons  herein  stated  I  veto  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
AUGUST  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  19,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  569,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  9283  of  an  Act  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly,  known  as  Senate  Bill  No.  129,  ap- 
proved March  25,  1946,  relating  to  State  Eleemosynary 
Institutions,  nurses,  attendants,  and  other  employees, 
their  employment  and  compensation  and  to  enact  in  lieu 
thereof  one  new  section  relating  to  State  Eleemosynary 
Institutions,  nurses,  attendants  and  other  employees, 
their  employment,  compensation,  wages  and  number  of 
hours  of  work  a  day,  to  be  known  as  Section  9283," 

The  63rd  General  Assembly  passed  Senate  Bill  No.  129 
fixing  the  compensation  of  employees  in  the  State  Hospitals 
at  not  less  than  $900.00  per  year  or  $75.00  per  month. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  171 

The  63rd  General  Assembly  passed  Senate  Bill  No.  85 
increasing  the  salary  of  the  Superintendent  of  the  Missouri 
State  Sanatorium  at  Mount  Vernon  to  a  sum  not  to  exceed 
$6,000.00  per  annum. 

Said  General  Assembly  also  passed  Senate  Bill  No.  86 
increasing  the  salaries  of  the  Superintendents  at  the  several 
State  Hospitals  to  an  amount  not  exceeding  $6,000.00  per 
annum. 

Said  General  Assembly  passed  Senate  Bill  No.  87  increas- 
ing the  salary  of  the  staff  physicians  at  the  State  Hospitals 
at  not  to  exceed  $4,000.00  per  year  and  also  increased  the 
number  of  physicians. 

However,  the  63rd  General  Assembly  failed  to  provide 
sufficient  funds  to  pay  these  increases. 

For  instance,  at  State  Hospital  No.  1,  Fulton,  the  appro- 
priation for  Personal  Service  for  the  fiscal  year  was  $450,- 
000.00  or  $37,500.00  per  month.  The  monthly  payroll  for 
June,  1946,  was  $32,604.27.  This  difference  of  $4,895.73  per 
month  is  not  sufficient  to  put  into  effect  the  present  laws  that 
are  now  in  effect  and  the  eight  hour  law  (House  Bill  No.  569). 
The  sum  of  $6,234.00  per  month  is  needed  to  raise  the  present 
employees  to  a,  minimum  of  $75.00.  The  sum  of  $517.27  per 
month  is  needed  to  increase  the  present  employees  propor- 
tionately. The  sum  of  $1,085.79  per  month  is  needed  to  in- 
crease the  salary  of  the  superintendent  and  physicians  under 
the  above  mentioned  bills.  It  will  require  $1,512.00  per 
month  for  additional  employees  needed  under  the  present  set 
up.  If  House  Bill  No.  569  should  become  a  law  (the  eight 
hour  bill)  it  will  require  $8,400.00  per  month  to  put  it  into 
operation.  The  present  payroll  plus  the  above  enumerated 
additions  would  require  an  appropriation  of  $50,353.33  per 
month  or  $604,239.96  per  year.  As  only  $450,000.00  for  Per- 
sonal Service  for  State  Hospital  No.  1  for  this  fiscal  year  was 
appropriated,  there  would  be  a  shortage  of  $154,239.96  in 
Personal  Service  for  State  Hospital  No.  1  for  this  fiscal  year. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  2,  St.  Joseph,  the  appropriation 
for  Personal  Service  for  the  fiscal  year  was  $450,000.00  or 
$37,500.00  per  month.  The  monthly  payroll  for  June,  1946, 
was  $34,871.84.  This  difference  of  $2,628.16  per  month  is  not 
sufficient  to  put  into  operation  the  present  laws  that  are  now 
in  effect  and  the  eight  hour  law.  The  sum  of  $355.00  per 


172  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

month  is  needed  to  raise  the  present  employees  to  a  minimum 
of  $75.00.  The  sum  of  $885.00  per  month  is  needed  to  increase 
the  present  employees  proportionately.  The  sum  of  $930.00 
per  month  is  needed  to  increase  the  salary  of  the  superintendent 
and  physicians  under  the  above  mentioned  bills.  It  will  require 
$7,500.00  per  month  for  additional  employees  needed  under 
the  present  set  up.  If  the  eight  hour  bill  should  become  a 
law  it  will  require  $8,500.00  per  month  to  put  it  into  operation. 
The  present  payroll  plus  the  above  enumerated  additions 
would  require  an  appropriation  of  $53,041.84  per  month  or 
$636,502.08  per  year.  As  only  $450,000.00  for  Personal  Serv- 
ice for  State  Hospital  No.  2  for  this  fiscal  year  was  appro- 
priated, there  would  be  a  shortage  of  $186,502.08  in  Personal 
Service  for  State  Hospital  No.  2  for  this  fiscal  year. 

At  State  Hospital  No.  3,  Nevada,  the  appropriation  for 
Personal  Service  for  the  fiscal  year  was  $357,000.00  or  $29,- 
750.00  per  month.  The  monthly  payroll  for  June,  1946,  was 
$30,409.35.  The  June,  1946,  payroll  is  $659.35  more  than  the 
average  monthly  amount  which  was  appropriated.  The  sum 
of  $300.00  per  month  is  needed  to  raise  the  present  employees 
to  a  minimum  of  $75.00.  The  sum  of  $670.84  per  month  is 
needed  to  increase  the  salary  of  the  superintendent  and  phy- 
sicians under  the  above  mentioned  bills.  It  will  require  $3,~ 
375.00  per  month  for  additional  employees  needed  under  the 
present  set  up.  If  the  eight  hour  bill  should  become  a  law  it 
will  require  $6,425.00  per  month  to  put  it  into  operation.  The 
present  payroll  plus  the  above  enumerated  additions  would 
require  an  appropriation  of  $41,180.19  per  month  or  $494,- 
162.28  per  year.  As  only  $357,000,00  for  Personal  Service  for 
State  Hospital  No.  3  for  this  fiscal  year  was  appropriated* 
there  would  be  a  shortage  of  $137,162.28  in  Personal  Service 
for  State  Hospital  No.  3  for  this  fiscal  year.  No  proportionate 
increase  for  present  employees  is  figured  but  if  this  is  done 
it  will  take  an  additional  $1,070.00  per  month  for  said  increase* 

At  State  Hospital  No.  4,  Farmington,  the  appropriation 
for  Personal  Service  for  the  fiscal  year  was  $332,075,00  or 
$27,672.91  per  month*  The  monthly  payroll  for  June,  1946, 
was  $25,601.99.  This  difference  of  $2,070.92  per  month  is  not 
sufficient  to  put  into  operation  the  present  laws  that  are  now 
in  effect  and  the  eight  hour  law.  The  sum  of  $952.00  per 
month  is  needed  to  raise  the  present  employees  to  a  minimum 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  173 

of  $75.00.  The  sum  of  1580.00  per  month  is  needed  to  increase 
the  present  employees  proportionately.  The  sum  of  $410.00 
per  month  is  needed  to  increase  the  salary  of  the  superin- 
tendent and  physicians  under  the  above  mentioned  bills.  It 
will  require  $4,620.00  per  month  for  additional  employ  ee_s 
needed  under  the  present  set  up.  If  the  eight  hour  bill  should 
become  a  law  it  will  require  $6,500.00  per  month  to  put  it 
into  operation.  The  present  payroll  plus  the  above  enumerated 
additions  would  require  an  appropriation  of  $38,663.99  per 
month  or  $463,967.88  per  year.  As  only  $332,075.00  for  Per- 
sonal Service  for  State  Hospital  No.  4  for  this  fiscal  year  was 
appropriated,  there  would  be  a  shortage  of  $131,892.88  in 
Personal  Service  for  State  Hospital  No.  4  for  this  fiscal  year. 

At  Missouri  State  School  at  Marshall  and  Carrollton  the 
appropriation  for  Personal  Service  for  the  fiscal  year  was 
$212,340.00  or  $17,695.00  per  month.  The  monthly  payroll 
for  June,  1946,  was  $15,450.60.  This  difference  of  $2,244.40 
per  month  is  not  sufficient  to  put  into  operation  the  present 
laws  that  are  now  in  effect  and  the  eight  hour  law.  The  sum 
of  $1,210.00  per  month  is  needed  to  raise  the  present  em- 
ployees to  a  minimum  of  $75.00.  The  sum  of  $340.00  per 
month  is  needed  to  increase  the  present  employees  propor- 
tionately. The  sum  of  $248.00  per  month  is  needed  to  raise 
the  salary  of  the  superintendent  and  physicians  under  the 
above  mentioned  bills.  It  will  require  $1,835.00  per  month 
for  additional  employees  needed  under  the  present  set  up.  If 
the  eight  hour  bill  should  become  a  law  it  will  require  $3,155.00 
per  month  to  put  it  into  operation.  The  present  payroll  plus 
the  above  enumerated  additions  would  require  an  appropria- 
tion of  $22,238.60  per  month  or  $266,863.20  per  year.  As 
only  $212,340.00  for  Personal  Service  for  the  Missouri  State 
School  at  Marshall  and  Carrollton  for  this  fiscal  year  was 
appropriated,  there  would  be  a  shortage  of  $54,523.20  in  Per- 
sonal Service  for  Missouri  State  School  for  this  fiscal  year. 

On  the  present  basis  if  the  salary  of  employees  was  in- 
creased to  a  minimum  of  $75.00  per  month  and  other  em- 
ployees were  increased  proportionately  and  the  salaries  of  the 
superintendents  and  physicians  were  increased,  it  would 
amount  to  a  total  of  $1,843,871.40.  The  total  appropriations 
for  Personal  Service  amount  to  $1,801,415.00  or  a  shortage  of 
$42,456.40  on  the  present  basis.  This  does  not  allow  for  any 


174  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

additional  employees.  If  additional  employees  were  allowed, 
it  would  require  $18,842.00  per  month  or  $226,104.00  per 
annum.  In  other  words,  if  the  present  laws  are  put  into 
operation  and  if  additional  employees,  which  are  needed,  are 
included,  the  present  appropriation  for  Personal  Service  for 
this  fiscal  year  is  short  $268,560.40.  If  the  eight  hour  law 
were  put  into  effect  it  would  require  an  additional  $32,980.00 
per  month  or  $395,760.00  per  annum.  In  other  words,  to  put 
the  present  laws  into  operation,  and  to  employ  additional  em- 
ployees needed,  and  to  put  the  eight  hour  law  into  effect 
would  require  an  additional  appropriation  of  $664,320.40. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  General  Assembly  has  not 
appropriated  sufficient  funds  to  put  into  operation  the  present 
laws  that  now  apply  to  these  institutions  and  as  I  do  not 
know  whether  or  not  an  additional  amount  will  be  appro- 
priated to  put  into  effect  the  eight  hour  law,  I  cannot  approve 
the  eight  hour  law  at  this  time. 

There  is  another  reason  why  there  is  a  serious  doubt  as 
to  whether  House  Bill  No.  569  should  be  enacted  and  that  is 
because  it  will  conflict  with  House  Bill  No.  162,  known  as  the 
State  Merit  System  Act.  House  Bill  No.  569  pertains  to  the 
State  Hospitals  and  said  hospitals  are  included  in  the  Merit 
System,  Act  provided  for  by  House  Bill  No.  162.  Said  House 
Bill  No.  162  provides,  among  other  things,  as  follows: 

"Section  9.  The  Board  shall  have  power  to  prescribe 
such  rules  and  regulations  not  inconsistent  with  the  pro- 
visions of  this  act  as  it  deems  suitable  and  necessary  to 
carry  out  the  provisions  of  this  act.  Such  rules  and  regu- 
lations shall  be  effective  when  filed  with  the  secretary 
of  state  as  provided  by  law." 

Section  32  provides  as  follows: 

"The  regulations  shall  provide  for  the  hours  of  work, 
holidays,  attendance,  and  leaves  of  absence  in  the  various 
classes  of  positions  subject  to  this  act.  .  .  ," 

It  is  my  opinion,  when  the  Merit  System  Act  becomes  opera- 
tive, that  the  Merit  System  Board  will  have  the  right  to  pro- 
vide and  regulate  the  hours  of  work  in  the  different  eleemosy- 
nary institutions  and  for  that  reason  the  provisions  of  House 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  175 

Bill  No.  569  providing  for  an  eight  hour  day  conflict  with  the 
provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  162. 

For  the  reasons  herein  given  I  cannot  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

AUGUST  21,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  4714-4723 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  21,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  1026,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Appropriating  money  for  the  support  of  the  State 
Government  for  payment  of  certain  contingent  and  inci- 
dental expenses  of  the  State  Government,  for  the  period 
beginning  July  1,  1946,  and  ending  June  30,  1947;  and 
to  appropriate  money  for  the  payment  of  various  forms 
of  relief;  for  the  several  departments  of  the  State  Govern- 
ment, several  boards,  bureaus,  and  commissions  and  state 
officers,  and  persons,  firms  and  corporations  for  the  pay- 
ment of  which  the  state  may  be  liable,  and  appropriating 
funds  for  other  purposes  for  the  period  beginning  July  1, 
1946,  and  ending  June  30,  1947,  and  prior  years." 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 


176  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I. 

Section  9.010,  on  page  2,  in  line  17,  the  name  "Pender- 
gast"  is  erroneous,  it  should  be  "Prendergast"  and  I  suggest 
that  the  warrant  be  written  correctly  in  accordance  with  the 
claim. 

II. 

Section  9.160,  I  am  vetoing  $40,000.00  of  the  appropria- 
tion of  $75,000.00  mentioned  in  this  section,  for  the  reason 
it  is  my  information  that  $35,000.00  will  be  sufficient  to  pay 
the  refunds  referred  to  in  Section  9.160.  This  will  leave  $35,- 
000.00  in  effect,  two-thirds  of  said  amount  to  be  chargeable 
to  the  General  Revenue  Fund  and  one-third  chargeable  to 
that  part  of  the  ordinary  revenue  fund  set  aside  for  the  sup- 
port of  the  free  public  schools.  Said  percentage  being  in 
accordance  with  the  original  amount  set  forth  in  Section,  9.160, 

III. 

Section  9.310.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund, 
the  sum  of  Fifty  Thousand  Dollars  ($50,000.00)  for  the 
purpose  of  purchasing  and  installing  an  electric  roll-call 
system  in  the  chambers  of  the  House  of  Representatives; 
for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June 
30,  1947. 

I  hereby  veto  and  disallow  the  appropriation  of  $50,- 
000.00  set  forth  in  Section  9.310  for  the  reasons  hereinafter 
set  forth  in  the  veto  of  Section  9,311. 

IV. 

Section  9.311.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund, 
the  sum  of  Fifteen  Thousand  Dollars  ($15,000.00),  or  so 
much  thereof  as  may  be  necessary  to  install  proper  air 
conditioning  units  in  the  chambers  of  the  Senate,  for  the 
period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June  30,  1947. 

I  hereby  veto  and  disallow  the  appropriation  of  $15»~ 
000.00  set  forth  in  Section  9.311. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  177 

Honorable  J.  E.  Taylor,  the  Attorney  General,  has  fur- 
nished me  with  the  following  opinion  in  regard  to  the  consti- 
tutionality of  the  above  two  numbered  sections: 

"House  Resolution  No.  73,  passed  by  the  House  March 
29,  1945,  reads  as  follows: 

'Be  it  resolved,  that  the  Committee  on  purchasing  of  sup- 
plies, be,  and  the  same  is  hereby,  instructed  to  purchase 
and  have  installed  at  the  earliest  possible  date  an  ade- 
quate mechanical  device  for  reporting  the  roll  of  the 
House.' 

"This  Resolution  purports  to  be  the  basis  for  an  appro- 
priation, Section  9.310  of  House  Bill  No.  1026,  which  provides: 

'Section  9.310.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund, 
the  sum  of  Fifty  Thousand  Dollars  ($50,000.00)  for  the 
purpose  of  purchasing  and  installing  an  electric  roll-call 
system  in  the  chambers  of  the  House  of  Representatives; 
for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June 
30,  1947.' 

If  there  were  no  statutory  authority  for  the  appropriation  then 
it  would  be  in  violation  of  Section  23,  Article  III  of  the  Con- 
stitution of  1945,  which  provides  that  no  bill  shall  contain 
more  than  one  subject.  The  courts  have  construed  this  to 
mean  that  it  is  unconstitutional  to  legislate  in  an  appropria- 
tion act.  State  ex  rel.  Davis  v.  Smith,  75  S.  W.  (2d)  828; 
State  ex  rel.  Gains  v.  Canada,  113  S.  W.  (2d)  783. 

"This  brings  us  to  the  question  of  whether  or  not  a  House 
Resolution  may  be  used  instead  of  a  statute  to  make  a  perma- 
nent addition  to  the  House  Chamber.  A  resolution  is  no 
more  than  an  expression  of  the  opinion  of  a  legislative  body 
and,  in  the  case  of  Village  of  Altamont  v.  Baltimore  &  0.  S. 
W.  RR.,  63  N.  E,  340,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Illinois  said: 

*A  resolution  or  order  is  not  a  law  but  merely  the  form 
in  which  the  legislative  body  expresses  an  opinion.' 

Further,  in  the  case  of  Conley  v.  Texas  Division  of  U.  D.  of 
the  Confederacy,  (Tex.)  164  S.  W.  24,  the  court  said,  1.  c.  26: 


178  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

'The  chief  distinction  between  a  resolution  and  a  law 
seems  to  be  that  the  former  is  used  whenever  the  legis- 
lative body  passing  it  wishes  to  merely  express  an  opinion 
as  to  some  given  matter  or  thing,  and  is  only  to  have  a 
temporary  effect  on  such  particular  thing;  while  by  the 
latter  it  is  intended  to  permanently  direct  and  control 
matters  applying  to  persons  or  things  in  general.  .  .  .' 

In  54  C.  J.,  p.  721,  in  defining  a  resolution,  it  is  stated: 

'.  .  .  The  term  has  been  defined  as  a  formal  expression 
of  the  opinion  or  will  of  an  official  body  or  a  public  assem- 
bly adopted  by  a  vote:  .  .  .' 

With  these  definitions  in  mind,  we  believe  that  a  resolution 
of  this  type,  which  attempts  to  be  the  statutory  authority  for 
the  appropriation  of  money  to  install  a  permanent  roll -call 
machine  in  the  House  Chamber,  is  in  violation  of  Section  21, 
Article  III,  of  the  Constitution  of  1945,  which  reads  in  part 
as  follows: 

'.    .    .    No  law  shall  be  passed  except  by  bill,    .    .    .' 
"Section  9.311,  of  House  Bill  No.  1026,  provides: 

'Section  9.311.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund, 
the  sum  of  Fifteen  Thousand  Dollars  ($15,000.00),  or  so 
much  thereof  as  may  be  necessary  to  install  proper  air 
conditioning  units  in  the  chambers  of  the  Senate,  for  the 
period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June  30,  1947.' 

In  this  case  we  have  no  statutory  authority,  or  purported 
statutory  authority  by  resolution  for  the  appropriation.  As 
said  above,  this  does  not  comply  with  Section  23,  of  Article 
III,  of  the  Constitution  of  1945.  It  might  be  argued  that  it 
is  not  necessary  to  have  further  statutory  authority  for  either 
of  these  appropriations,  because  it  may  be  found  in  Section 
12872,  R.  S.  Mo.  1939,  which  provides: 

'Each  house  shall  control  its  own  contingent  expenses; 
and  when  any  accounts,  properly  chargeable  to  the  house 
of  representatives,  shall  be  adjusted  and  allowed  accord- 
ing to  the  rules  of  that  house,  a  certificate  thereof  shall 
be  granted,  signed  by  the  speaker  and  attested  by  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  179 

chief  clerk;  and  when  any  account  or  demand  for  con- 
tingent expenses  of  the  senate  shall  be  allowed  according 
to  the  rules  of  that  house,  a  certificate  thereof  shall  be 
granted,  signed  by  the  president  and  attested  by  the 
secretary/ 

In  the  case  of  Johnson  et  al.  v.  Donham  et  al.f  84  S.  W.  (2d) 
374,  the  court,  in  defining  contingent  expenses  stated,  I.  c.  376: 

'.  .  .  that  is,  such  expenses  as  might  ordinarily  be  ex- 
pected to  arise  in  the  conduct  of  the  office,  but  which 
might  not  occur.  .  .  .' 

Further,  in  William  P.  Dunwoody  v.  The  United  States,  22 
Court  of  Claims  Rep.  269,  the  court  states,  1.  c.  280: 

'.  .  .  The  adjectives  contingent,  incidental,  and  mis- 
cellaneous, as  used  in  appropriation  bills  to  qualify  the 
word  expenses,  have  a  technical  and  well-understood 
meaning;  it  is  usual  for  Congress  to  name  the  principal 
classes  of  expenditure  which  they  authorize,  such  as  clerk 
hire,  fuel,  light,  postage,  telegrams,  &c.,  and  then  to  make 
a  small  appropriation  for  the  minor  and  unimportant  dis- 
bursements incidental  to  any  great  business,  which  can- 
not well  be  foreseen  and  which  it  would  be  useless  to 
specify  more  accurately.  For  such  disbursements  a  round 
sum  is  appropriated  under  the  head  of  "contingent  ex- 
penses," .  .  .' 

It  seems  very  clear  to  us  that  a  capital  investment,  such  as 
the  voting  machine  and  air  conditioning  unit,  could  not  be 
called  contingent  expense. 

"It  is,  therefore,  my  conclusion  that  Section  9.310  and 
Section  9.311  of  House  Bill  No.  1026,  are  unconstitutional 
because  there  is  no  statutory  authority  for  the  appropriations 
found  in  these  sections." 

I  concur  in  the  opinion  of  the  Attorney  General. 

V. 

Section  9.341.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund 
the  sum  of  Thirty  Million  Dollars  ($30,000,000.00)  to  be 


180  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

transferred  and  set  apart  to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Re- 
serve Fund  for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and 
ending  June  30,  1947. 

Honorable  J.  E.  Taylor,  the  Attorney  General,  has  fur- 
nished me  with  the  following  opinion  in  regard  to  the  consti- 
tutionality of  the  above  numbered  section: 

"The  63rd  General  Assembly  by  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  14  created  a  fund  known  as  The 
Missouri  Postwar  Reserve  Fund/  Said  act  provided  that  the 
fund  sho,uld  consist  of: 

'moneys  appropriated  by  the  General  Assembly  of  the 
State  of  Missouri  to  be  credited  to  such  fund,  apd  any 
moneys  paid  into  the  state  treasury,  an,d  required  by  law 
to  be  credited  to  such  fund/ 

"The  act  further  provided  that: 

'This  fund  shall  be  kept  separate  and  apart  from  all  other 
moneys  in  the  state  treasury  and  shall  be  paid  out  as 
provided  by  law/  (Emphasis  mine) 

"The  purpose  of  the  fund  as  provided  in  the  act  was  that: 

'Such  moneys,  after  appropriation  pursuant  to  law,  shall 
be  available  only  for  postwar  capital  projects,  postwar 
public  works,  postwar  unemployment  projects,  and  for 
other  purposes  considered  by  the  general  assembly  to  be 
necessary  for  postwar  rehabilitation  and  improvements 
for  Missouri/  (Emphasis  mine) 

"Pursuant  to  the  above  quoted  enabling  act  the  General 
Assembly  in  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
15  provided: 

'There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State  Treasury, 
chargeable  to  the  general  revenue  fund,  the  sum  of  eight- 
een million  dollars  ($18,000,000.00)  to  be  transferred  and 
set  apart  to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Reserve  Fund/ 

"The  General  Assembly  further  in  an  appropriation  act. 
House  Bill  No.  1026,  Section  9,341  provided: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  181 

'There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State  Treasury 
chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund  the  sum  of 
Thirty  Million  Dollars  ($30,000,000.00)  to  be  transferred 
and  set  apart  to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Reserve  Fund  for 
the  period  beginning  July  1,  1946  and  ending  June  30, 
1947.' 

"Out  of  the  fund  set  up  by  the  above  statutes,  House 
Bill  No.  837  appropriated  $5,366,750.00  for  the  purpose  of 
building  dormitories  at  various  state  colleges  in  Missouri. 
Out  of  the  same  fund  House  Bill  No.  992,  Sections  7.012, 
7.013  and  7.022  appropriated  $1,212,750.33  to  the  State  Uni- 
versity and  the  School  of  Mines  for  various  stated  educational 
purposes. 

"From  reading  the  above  statutes  the  following  questions 
arise: 

"1)  Are  House  Bill  No.  1026  and  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15,  which  transfer  $48,- 
000,000.00  out  of  the  General  Revenue  to  the  Postwar 
Reserve  Fund,  appropriation  acts? 

"2)  If  such  house  bills  are  appropriation  acts,  for  what 
period  of  time  is  the  money  in  said  fund  available  for 
disbursement? 

"Section  23,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri 
1945  provides  in  part  as  follows: 

'Every  appropriation  law  shall  distinctly  specify  the 
amount  and  purpose  of  the  appropriation  without  ref- 
erence to  any  other  law  to  fix  the  amount  or  purpose.' 

"Section  28,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri 
1945,  states: 

'No  money  shall  be  withdrawn  from  the  state  treasury 
except  by  warrant  drawn  in  accordance  with  an  appro- 
priation made  by  law.  .  .  .* 

"An  appropriation,  as  defined  in  State  ex  rel.  McKinley 
Pub.  Co.,  v.  Hackmann,  282  S.  W.  1007,  1.  c.  1010,  is  as 
follows : 


182  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

'.  .  .  An  appropriation  act  does  no  more  than  to  set 
apart  or  designate  the  amount  and  the  purposes  for  which 
the  authorized  expenditures  may  be  made  by  the  depart- 
ment named.  .  .  .' 

"Under  the  above  definition  of  an  appropriation  an  act 
of  the  Legislature,  in  order  to  be  an  appropriation  bill,  must 
permit  expenditures  to  be  made  from  the  fund  set  apart  or 
designated. 

"Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  and 
House  Bill  No.  1026  in  transferring  and  setting  apart  $48,000,- 
000.00  to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Reserve  Fund  do  not  contem- 
plate the  expenditure  of  such  funds  under  authority  of  those 
acts  themselves.  This  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  the  General 
Assembly  deemed  it  necessary  to  appropriate  by  separate  acts 
money  out  of  the  Postwar  Reserve  Fund  before  such  moneys 
could  be  used.  It  appears  that  the  intent  of  the  Legislature 
was  merely  to  transfer  money  from  one  fund  in  the  State 
treasury  to  another  fund.  As  Senate  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  14  states,  the  Postwar  Reserve  fund  shall 
be  kept  separate  and  apart  from  all  other  moneys  'in  the  State 
Treasury/  and  further  provides  that  such  moneys  shall  be 
available  only  'after  appropriation  pursuant  to  law/ 

"It  is  well  settled  in  Missouri  that  the  Legislature  may 
transfer  moneys  from  one  fund  in  the  treasury  to  another 
fund.  In  State  ex  rel.  Davis  v.  Smith,  75  S.  W.  (2d)  828,  this 
practice  is  approved  when  the  court  said  at  1.  c.  830: 

*.  .  .  We  recognize  the  right  of  the  Legislature  to  pro- 
vide by  law  that  the  surplus  in  such  fund  shall  be  trans- 
ferred to  the  general  revenue  fund  instead  of  the  public 
school  fund,  but  the  act  of  February  28,  1933  (Laws  1933, 
p.  415)  which  purports  to  transfer  to  the  general  revenue 
fund  all  sums  of  money  in  the  state  treasury  to  the  credit 
of  the  board  of  barbers'  fund,  etc.,  would  not  have  the 
effect  of  transferring  a  surplus  remaining  in  such  fund  for 
the  years  1931  and  1932,  the  title  to  which  had  by  law 
passed  to  and  vested  in  the  public  school  fund  before  the 
transfer  act  of  February  28,  1933,  waa  passed.  This  act 
does  not  purport  to  transfer  any  definite  amount  of 
money  to  the  general  revenue  fund-  It  simply  directs  the 
state  treasurer  to  transfer  to  the  general  revenue  fund  all 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  183 

sums  of  money  in  the  state  treasury  to  the  credit  of  the 
numerous  funds  named  in  the  act,  including  the  board  of 
barbers'  fund.' 

"Furthermore,  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  14  specifically  provides  that  the  fund  shall  be  created 
by  moneys  appropriated  by  the  General  Assembly.  In  Werner 
v.  Martin,  194  N.  E.  264,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Illinois  said: 

*.  .  .  The  General  Assembly  determined  that,  instead 
of  setting  apart  one-third  of  the  motor  fuel  tax  fund  for 
road  purposes,  that  portion  should  be  set  apart  for  schools 
and  placed  in  the  common  school  fund.  We  said  in  Reif 
v.  Barrett,  355  111.  104,  188  N.  E.  889,  902,  that  "the 
creation  of  separate  and  distinct  funds  in  the  state  treas- 
ury is  regulated  by  the  statute.  Except  for  funds  pledged 
to  the  retirement  of  bonds  and  interest  the  funds  are  sub- 
ject to  the  legislative  will.  The  funds  may  be  changed, 
or  even  abolished,  and  the  funds  therein  transferred  to 
other  accounts  or  funds."  Section  17  of  Article  4  of  the 
Constitution  provides  that  no  money  shall  be  drawn  from 
the  treasury  except  in  pursuance  of  an  appropriation 
made  by  law  and  upon  the  presentation  of  a  warrant 
issued  by  the  auditor  thereon.  No  money  shall  be  di- 
verted from  any  appropriation  made  for  any  purpose  or 
taken  from  any  fund  either  by  joint  or  separate  resolution. 
The  transfer  in  this  case  was  not  made  by  resolution, 
either  joint  or  separate,  but  was  made  by  an  act  of  the 
General  Assembly  passed  by  a  majority  of  the  members 
elected  to  both  houses.' 

"In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  Parker  v.  Youngquist,  11 
N.  W.  (2d)  84,  1.  c.  86  the  Supreme  Court  of  South  Dakota 
had  before  it  the  question  of  whether  a  statute  that  transferred 
10%  of  the  receipts  of  various  state  boards  and  commissions 
to  the  genera,!  fund  of  the  state  was  an  appropriation  act. 
The  court  said: 

'.  .  .  An  appropriation  is  legislative  sanction  for  the 
disbursement  of  the  public  revenue.  In  re  Continuing 
Appropriations,  18  Colo.  192,  32  P.  272.  The  test  of 
whether  an  act  is  an  appropriation  is  whether  the  money 
may  be  paid  or  drawn  from  the  state  treasury  on  author- 


184  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

ity  of  the  act.  Humbert  v.  Dunn,  84  CaL  57,  24  P.  11; 
Campbell  v.  Towner  County,  71  N,  D.  616,  3  N.  W.  (2d) 
822;  People  ex  rel.  Colorado  State  Hospital  v.  Arm- 
strong, 104  Colo.  238,  90  P.  2d  522,  The  act  in  question 
authorizes  no  disbursement  of  public  revenue.  No  money 
may  be  drawn  from  the  state  treasury  on  authority  of 
the  act.  By  its  terms  it  reduces  the  continuing  appro- 
priations of  the  eighteen  separate  governmental  depart- 
ments mentioned  therein  by  means  of  the  transfer  of  a 
part  of  their  tax  receipts  to  the  general  fund  of  the  state 
where  those  funds  are  to  be  mingled  with  other  tax  col- 
lections and  used  to  meet  appropriations  payable  out  of 
that  fund.  This  law  is  not  an  appropriation  of  public 
money.' 

"One  contention  that  might  react  contrary  to  the  view 
that  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  and 
House  Bill  No.  1026  are  not  appropriations  is  that  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  14  provides  that 
the  fund  shall  consist  of  money  'appropriated'  by  the  General 
Assembly;  and  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill 
No,  15  and  House  Bill  No*  1026  both  provide  that.  There 
is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the  State  Treasury/  thereby 
indicating  that  the  General  Assembly  in  using  the  words 
'appropriated'  intended  that  such  bills  should  be  appropria- 
tion acts. 

"However,  as  our  Supreme  Court  said  m  State  ex  rel 
Path  v*  Henderson,  160  Mo.  190,  *tha  word  "appropriate**  i$ 
one  of  significance  of  which  is  largely  effected  by  the  context 
in  which  it  is  found/ 

"The  same  question  was  presented  to  the  Supreme  Court 
of  Colorado  in  People  ex  rel  Colorado  State  Hospital  v.  Arm- 
strong, 90  Pacific  (2d)  522,  wherein  it  was  contended  that  a 
bill  that  created  a  certain  fund  and  appropriated  to  such  fund 
a  certain  sum  of  money  was  an  appropriation  act  because  the 
word  *appropriated*  was  used*  The  Court  said  1.  c«  527: 

*.  .  *  The  argument  that  the  act  under  consideration 
is  an  appropriation  measure  is  largely  grounded  upon  the 
circumstances  that  in  two  places  therein  the  word  ^appro- 
priate" appears.  A§  demonstrative  of  legislative  intent 
it  may  be  mentioned  that  the  subtitle  0!  the  amended 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  185 

section  of  the  income  tax  law,  which  constitutes  the  body 
of  the  new  legislation,  is:  "Allocation  of  Revenue."  In 
the  first  instance  of  its  use  in  the  act,  the  legislature 
couples  the  word  "appropriate'*  and  the  words  "set  aside" 
as  if  they  were  synonymous.  That  the  word  "appro- 
priate" is  one  of  its  ordinary  proper  definitions,  means 
"set  aside"  or  "allocate"  is  clear.  Webster's  New  Inter- 
national Dictionary,  Second  Edition;  6  C.  J.  S.,  Appro- 
priate, p.  121.  When  the  purpose  and  object  of  the  bill 
are  considered,  the  use  of  the  word  "appropriate",  in  the 
sense  indicated,  cannot  be  said  to  import  to  the  act  the 
classification  of  an  appropriation  measure,  but  rather 
stamps  it  as  one  for  the  allocation  of  revenue,  which  we 
conclude  it  is.' 

"What  was  said  in  the  case  above  is  especially  apropos 
to  the  question  at  hand.  It  will  be  noticed  that  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  and  House  Bill  No. 
1026  both  provide  that  the  money  will  be  transfered  and  set 
apart  to  the  fund.  Furthermore,  the  title  to  Senate  Com- 
mitee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  reads  as  follows: 

To  appropriate,  transfer  and  set  apart  money  from  the 
general  revenue  fund,  to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Reserve 
Fund,  with  an  emergency  clause/ 

"We  believe  that  it  is  obvious  that  the  Legislature  in 
using  the  word  appropriate  meant  it  to  be  synonymous  with 
the  other  words  in  the  act,  that  is,  transfer  and  set  apart.  In 
view  of  the  above  authorities  it  would  appear  that  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  and  House  Bill 
No.  1026  are  not  appropriation  acts  but  merely  laws  provid- 
ing for  the  transfer  of  moneys  from  one  fund  to  another.  As 
general  laws  providing  for  the  transfer  of  moneys  from  one 
fund  to  another  they  do  not  come  within  the  prohibition  of 
Section  23,  Article  IV,  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri  which 
provides  that,  'the  General  Assembly  shall  make  appropria- 
tions for  one  or  two  fiscal  years/  The  moneys  remain  in  stich 
fund  until  their  status  is  changed  by  a  subsequent  Legislature 
in  passing  a  law,  either  transferring  or  abolishing  said  fund. 
As  was  pointed  out  in  State  v.  ex  reL  Fath  v.  Henderson* 
supra* 


186  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

*.  .  .  Let  it  be  freely  admitted  that  one  General  Assem- 
bly can  not  tie  the  hands  of  its  successor,  and  that  although 
this  tax  is  set  apart  into  a  special  fund,  it  still  belongs  to 
the  State.  ,  .  .' 

"In  view  of  the  holding  that  the  transferring  of  funds  by 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  and  House 
Bill  No.  1026  are  not  appropriation  acts,  a  serious  question 
arises  as  to  the  constitutionality  of  the  transfer  in  House  Bill 
No.  1026. 

"Section  23,  Article  III,  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri 
1945,  provides: 

*No  bill  shall  contain  more  than  one  subject  which  shall 
be  clearly  expressed  in  its  title,  except  bills  enacted  under 
the  third  exception  in  section  37  of  this  article  and  general 
appropriation  bills,  which  may  embrace  the  various  sub- 
jects and  accounts  for  which  moneys  are  appropriated/ 

"Section  37,  mentioned  in  the  above  provision  relates  to 
the  payment  of  interest  upon  state  bonds  and  is  not  appli- 
cable to  the  question  under  discussion* 

"As  stated  above,  the  act  appropriating  thirty  million 
dollars  ($30,000,000.00)  to  the  Postwar  Reserve  Fund  is  Sec- 
tion 9.341  of  House  Bill  No.  1026.  The  title  to  House  Bill 
No.  1026  is  as  follows; 

'Appropriating  money  for  the  support  of  the  Stato  Gov- 
ernment for  payment  of  certain  contingent  and  incidental 
expenses  of  the  State  Government*  for  the  period  begin- 
ning July  1,  1946,  and  ending  June  30,  1947;  and  to  appro- 
priate money  for  the  payment  of  various  forms  of  relief; 
for  the  several  departments  of  the  State  Government, 
several  boards,  bureaus,  and  commissions  and  state  offi- 
cers, and  persons,  firms  and  corporations  for  the  payment 
of  which  the  state  may  be  liabJe,  and  appropriating  funds 
for  other  purposes  for  the  period  beginning  July  lf  1940f 
and  ending  June  30,  1947,  and  prior  years/ 

HIt  is  well  settled  in  this  state  that  legislation  of  a  general 
character  cannot  be  included  in  an  appropriation  bill  State 
ex  rel.  v.  Smith,  75  S.  W*  (2d)  828;  State  e%  ret  Guinea  v*  Can- 
ada, 113  S.  W.  (2d)  783,  342  Mo,  121.  Therefore,  whin  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  187 

Legislature  transferred  thirty  million  dollars  ($30,000,000.00) 
from  the  general  revenue  to  the  Postwar  Reserve  Fund,  in  an 
appropriation  act  it  rendered  such  transfer  unconstitutional 
and  void. 

"It  is,  therefore,  my  conclusion  that  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly, 
which  transfers  eighteen  million  dollars  ($18,000,000.00)  from 
the  genera]  revenue  to  the  Postwar  Reserve  Fund,  is  not  an 
appropriation  bill  but  is  a  general  statute  transferring  money 
from  one  fund  in  the  State  Treasury  to  another.  It  is  further 
my  opinion  that  Section  9.341,  House  Bill  No.  1026  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  which  transfers  thirty  million  dollars 
($30,000,000.00)  from  the  genera)  revenue  to  the  Postwar 
Reserve  Fund,  is  unconstitutional  because  it  is  legislation  of 
a  general  character  included  in  an  appropriation  bill,  contrary 
to  Section  23,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri  1945." 

I  concur  in  the  opinion  of  the  Attorney  General. 

For  the  reasons  above  set  forth  I  hereby  veto  and  dis- 
allow the  $30,000,000,00  mentioned  in  Section  9.341. 

I  suggest  that  if  additional  funds  are  to  be  transferred 
to  the  Missouri  Postwar  Reserve  Fund  that  it  be  done  by  an 
act  of  the  legislature  for  that  specific  purpose,  as  was  done  by 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  15. 

VL 

Section  9.350,  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  fund 
the  sum  of  Fifty  Thousand  Dollars  ($50,000.00)  to  the 
Conservation  Commission  of  Missouri  for  fire  protection 
to  the  forests  of  Missouri  and  the  sum  of  Two  Hundred 
Thousand  Dollars  ($200,000*00)  to  create  a  revolving  fund 
pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  House  Bill  No,  1006* 

I  approve  the  appropriation  of  $50,000*00  to  the  Con* 
servation  Commission  of  Missouri  for  fire  protection,  to  the 
forests  of  Missouri-  I  am  vetoing  the  sum  of  $200,000,00  to 
create  a  revolving  fund  pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  House 
Bill  No-  1006,  as  set  forth  in  lines  6  to  8,  inclusive,  of  Section 
9*350*  This  sum  is  vetoed  for  the  reason  that  it  violates  the 
provisions  of  Section  23,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of 
1945*  which  requires: 


188  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

".  .  .  Every  appropriation  law  shall  distinctly  specify 
the  amount  and  purpose  of  the  appropriation  without 
reference  to  any  other  law  to  fix  the  amount  or  purpose." 

It  is  not  clear  that  the  sum  of  1200,000.00  is  to  be  appropriated 
to  the  Conservation  Commission.  That  part  is  very  indefinite. 
The  provision  "to  create  a  revolving  fund  pursuant  to  the  pro- 
visions of  House  Bill  No.  1006''  refers  to  another  law  to  fix 
the  purpose  of  the  appropriation.  This  is  in  direct  conflict 
with  Section  23,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri, 
For  this  reason  said  sum  of  $200,000.00  is  vetoed. 

On  'August  21,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  1026 
as  to  all  items  and  portions  of  items  thereof,  except  the  items 
and  portions  of  items  which  are,  as  in  this  message  above 
stated,  returned  without  my  approval. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

NOVKMBEE  9,  1946 

From  th&  Journal  of  th$  Home  of  R®pr&8$ntativ&8f  pp. 


Qmcis,  STATE  OF  MXBSQUEI,  'jttmsaoH  Cn% 
November  #»  1940* 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir;  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without 
my  approval,  Senate  Substitute  for  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No,  838f  entitled: 

**AN  ACT 

l4To  repeal  Seetioas  3226  to  3232,  both  inclusive. 
Chapter  15*  Rawed  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1930,  relating 
to  interest*  and  to  eaaet  seveateea  new  sections  in  lieu 
thereof,  relating  to  interest  mad  other  charges  which  may 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  189 

be  charged,  contracted  for  and  received ;  providing  for  an 
interest  code  applicable  generally  and  to  all  lenders  and 
creditors  without  regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of 
their  business;  providing  methods  of  charging  and  collect- 
ing interest  and  requiring  refund  of  unearned  interest 
collected  on  certain  types  of  loans;  requiring  a  statement 
of  the  loan  and  its  terms  and  conditions  to  be  given  in 
connection  with  the  making  of  certain  types  of  loans;  regu- 
lating the  advertising  of  lenders;  requiring  return  of  papers 
upon  payment  of  certain  loans;  declaring  and  providing 
payment  of  three  hundred  dollars  or  less  in  money,  credit, 
goods  or  things  in  action  as  consideration  for  any  sale, 
assignment  or  order  for  the  payment  of  wages,  salaries, 
commissions  or  compensation,  for  services  earned  or  to 
be  earned,  to  be  a  loan  for  the  purposes  of  the  provisions 
of  this  act;  declaring  that  this  act  shall  not  affect  con- 
tracts entered  into  prior  to  the  effective  date  of  this  act; 
providing  penalties  for  the  violation  of  any  of  the  pro- 
visions of  this  act  and  repealing  all  laws  or  parts  of  laws 
in  conflict  therewith,  to  be  known  as  Sections  2,  3,  4,  5, 
6,  7,  8,  9,  10,  11,  12,  13,  14,  15,  16,  17  and  18." 

In  discussing  Senate  Substitute  for  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No*  838  it  will  be  referred  to  as  House 
Bill  No.  838. 

House  Bill  No,  838  repeals  Sections  3226  to  3232,  inclu- 
sive, Chapter  15,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating 
to  interest  and  enacts  seventeen  new  sections  in  lieu  thereof 
relating  to  interest  and  other  matters. 

Under  the  law  as  it  exists  now  the  maximum  rate  of 
interest  which  may  be  charged  on  any  loan  is  eight  per  cent 
per  annum  simple  interest  (Section  3227,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939).  This  bill  reenacts  that  maximum  rate  in 
Section  9,  However,  the  bill  classifies  four  types  of  loans  up- 
on which  a  greater  rate  is  permitted.  These  special  types  of 
loans  are  as  follows: 

1.  Section  3  of  the  bill  allows  two  per  cent  per  month 
to  be  charged  upon  a  loan  which  is  secured  by  a  pledge  of 
tangible  personal  property,  actual  possession  of  which  is  de- 
livered to  the  lender  under  an  agreement  that  if  the  loan  is 


190  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

not  paid  the  unqualified  title  is  to  pass  to  the  lender.    This 
is  the  ordinary  type  of  loan  that  is  made  by  a  pawnbroker. 

2.  Section  4  of  the  bill  provides  that  upon  loans  evi- 
denced by  a  note  payable  in  one  payment  and  which,  in  addi- 
tion to  such  other  security  as  may  be  given,  other  than  a  mort- 
gage or  deed  of  trust  on  real  estate,  is  secured  by  the  "pledge 
or  assignment  of  the  written  obligation  of  the  lender  to  pay 
a  sum  certain  in  money  to  the  borrower  at  a  fixed  date  upon 
the  borrower  having  paid  to  the  lender  the  full  purchase  price 
of  the  same/*    The  rate  of  interest  to  not  exceed  ten  per  cent 
per  annum  taken,  in  advance  as  discount.    This  type  of  loan 
is  one  that  is  usually  made  by  loan  and  investment  com- 
panies who  sell  investment  certificates  to  borrowers,  which 
certificates  are  in  turn  pledged  back  to  the  lender  to  secure 
the  payment  of  the  note. 

3.  Section  5  of  the  bill  makes  a  separate  classification 
of  loans  in  the  amount  of  one  thousand  dollars  or  less  evidenced 
by  a  promissory  note  which  is  unsecured  or  secured  by  per- 
sonal property  of  any  kind  and  the  interest  is  to  be  paid  only 
as  earned  and  is  computed  monthly  on  the  unpaid  balances* 
The  ratesf  allowed  to  be  charged  upon  such  loans  are  as  follows: 

Two  and  one-fourth  per  cent  per  month  on  that  part  of 
the  unpaid  principal  balance  not  exceeding  one  hundred 
dollars- 
Two  per  cent  per  month  on  that  part  of  the  unpaid  prin* 
cipal  balance  exceeding  one  hundred  dollars  but  not  ex- 
ceeding three  hundred  dollars* 

Two-thirds  of  one  per  cent  per  month  on  that  part  of 
the  unpaid  principal  balance  exceeding  three  hundred 
dollars  but  not  exceeding  one  thousand  dollars* 

This  type  of  loan  is  the  same  as  that  made  heretofore  by  the 
small  loan  companies, 

4*  Section  6  of  the  bill  makes  a  separate  classification  of 
installment  loans*  Interest  charged  is  taken  in  advance  as 
discount.  Said  loans  may  be  unsecured  or  secured  by  a 
pledge  or  assignment  of  or  mortgage  or  other  lieu  on  personal 
property  of  any  kind*  Upon  such  type  of  lotus  six  ptr  cent 
discount  per  annum  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount 
borrowed  not  exceeding  out  thousand  dollars  and  four  per 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  191 

cent  discount  per  annum  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal 
amount  borrowed  exceeding  one  thousand  dollars  may  be 
charged.  These  rates  may  be  charged  notwithstanding  the 
reduction  of  the  unpaid  principal  amount  by  the  payment  of 
installments  from  time  to  time. 

Is  House  Bill  No.  838  in  conflict  with  Section  44,  Article 
III  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1945? 

Said  section  is  as  follows: 

* 'Section  44.  No  law  shall  be  valid  fixing  rates  of  interest 
or  return  for  the  loan  or  use  of  money,  or  the  service  or 
other  charges  made  or  imposed  in  connection  therewith, 
for  any  particular  group  or  class  engaged  in  lending  money. 
The  rates  of  interest  fixed  by  law  shall  be  applicable  gen- 
erally and  to  all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type  or 
classification  of  their  business.'* 

The  above  section  does  three  things: 

a.  It  renders  invalid  any  law  which  fixes  a  rate  of  interest 
or  rate  for  any  particular  group  or  class  engaged  in  lending 
money, 

b.  It  renders  invalid  any  law  which  fixes,  that  is,  permits 
a  rate  for  the  service  or  other  charges  which  may  be  charged 
any  particular  group  or  class  engaged  in  lending  money. 

c.  It  requires  that  the  rates  of  interest  fixed  shall  be  appli- 
cable generally  and  to  all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type 
or  classification  of  their  business. 

By  virtue  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution 
of  Missouri,  1945,  many  laws  fixing  rates  of  interest  for  var- 
ious classes  of  lenders,  namely,  small  loan  laws,  loan  and  in- 
vestment laws,  etc*,  became  invalid  July  1,  1946* 

The  framers  of  the  Constitution  in  adopting  Section  44, 
Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  were  dealing  only  with 
the  question  of  interest  rates.  It  evidently  was  the  intention 
of  the  framers  of  the  Constitution  to  limit  the  power  of  the 
legislature  in  the  fixing  of  interest  rates  to  prohibit  the  enact- 
ment of  different  rates  for  different  businesses.  That  inten- 
tion is  well  shown  in  the  debates  in  the  Convention  on  that 
subject. 


192  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

The  record  of  the  proceedings  of  the  Constitutional  Con- 
vention, beginning  on  page  908  shows  that  Senator  Allen 
McReynolds  offered  on  page  909  of  the  record  an  amendment 
on  the  question  of  interest  already  before  the  Convention. 
Senator  McReynolds'  amendment  was  to  complete  what  now 
constitutes  said  Section  44,  Article  III  as  finally  adopted.  The 
following  is  a  quotation  from  page  909: 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  My  amendment  will  destroy  every 
single  classification  of  any  kind  and  will  put  everybody 
loaning  money  on  a  common  plan.  Our  whole  trouble 
today  is  that  we  set  up  these  special  classifications  and 
give  them  special  benefits  because  of  alleged  conditions 
that  prevail  in  the  class.  Now,  my  theory  is  that  if  you 
wipe  out  classifications  so  that  they  are  on  a  common 
level,  then  you  find  yourself  back  to  your  fixed  interest 
rates  that  have  been,  in,  our  statutes  for  sixty  or  seventy 
years  and  these,  all  of  these  group  rates  built  around  a 
special  classification  must  disappear  under  the  Consti- 
tutional amendment.  *  „  ." 

In  Volume  11,  American  Jurisprudence,  page  674,  et  seq,» 
the  following  is  stated  with  respect  to  construction  of  Con- 
stitutions: 

"  The  fundamental  principle  of  constitutional  construe* 
tion  is  to  give  effect  to  the  intent  of  the  framera  of  the 
organic  law  and  of  the  people  adopting  it.  A  constitu- 
tional clause  must  be  construed  reasonably  to  carry  out 
the  intention  of  the  framers,  which  gives  rise  to  the 
corollary  that  it  should  not  be  construed  so  as  to  defeat 
the  obvious  intent  $  another  construction  equally  in 
accordance  with  the  words  and  sense  may  be  adopted 
which  will  enforce  and  carry  out  the  intent*  The  intent 
must  be  gathered  from  both  the  letter  and  spirit  of  the 
document* 

**  *It  has  been  very  appropriately  stated  that  the  polestar 
in  the  construction  of  Constitutions  is  the  intention  of 
the  makers  and  adopters. 

"  'Wherever  the  purpose  of  the  framers  of  a  Constitution 
k  clearly  expressed*  it  will  be  followed  by  the  courts, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  193 

Even  where  terms  of  a  constitutional  provision  are  not 
entirely  free  from  doubt,  they  must  be  interpreted  as 
nearly  as  possible  in  consonance  with  the  objects  and  pur- 
poses in  contemplation  at  the  time  of  their  adoption,  be- 
cause in  construing  a  constitutional  provision,  its  general 
scope  and  object  should  be  considered.'  " 

If,  then,  such  was  the  intention  of  the  framers  of  the  Con- 
stitution in  enacting  said  Section  44  it  must  be  held  to  prohibit 
different  rates  of  interest  from  being  "fixed"  for  different 
classes  and  groups  such  as  are  contained  in  the  several  sec- 
tions of  House  Bill  No.  838. 

Section  2  of  the  bill  is  as  follows: 

"Section  2.  The  rates  of  interest  and  charges  fixed  by 
this  act  shall  be  applicable  generally,  and  to  all  lenders 
without  regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of  their  busi- 
ness, and  shall  be  the  only  interest  and  charges  which 
may  be  made  or  imposed,  or  return  which  may  be  received, 
for  the  loan  or  use  of  money." 

Said  Section  2  does  follow  in  principle  and  with  much  of 
the  wording  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution. 
However,  Section  3  and  other  following  sections  of  said  House 
Bill  No,  838  contradict  the  general  terms  of  said  Section  2. 

Sections  3,  4,  5,  and  6  recognize  the  existence  of  certain 
particular  groups  or  classes  engaged  in  lending  money.  In 
said  sections  the  words  "a  loan  of  the  type  and  classification 
to  which  this  section  applies"  is  used  in  all  of  said  sections. 
Said  sections  fix  different  rates  of  interest  to  be  charged  by 
the  different  groups  and  classes  referred  to  in  said  sections. 
In  fact,  said  sections  actually  create  particular  groups  and 
classes  engaged  or  to  become  engaged  in  lending  money  and 
fix  for  each,  rates  of  interest  different  from  the  rates  permitted 
to  be  charged  by  other  classes  mentioned  in  said  several  sec- 
tions, and  all  other  classes  created  by  the  separate  sections 
of  the  bill  and  by  the  bill  as  a  whole.  For  instance.  Section  3 
of  the  bill  does  not  by  a  specific  name  designate  and  create 
the  particular  class  or  group  of  lenders  known  as  "pawn- 
brokers/1 It  does  however  construct  the  framework  and  pro- 
cedure for  lending  money  that  is  the  basis  of  the  business  of 
pawnbrokers.  Pawnbrokers  constitute  the  only  group  or  class 


194  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

engaged  in  lending  money  which  take  over  the  possession  of 
the  property  pledged  for  the  loan.  In  chattel  mortgages  and 
other  processes  of  taking  security  for  the  lending  of  money 
on  personal  property,  the  title  remains  in  the  mortgagor  until 
condition  broken.  Not  so  with  the  pawnbroker  business.  In 
creating  that  particular  class  and  type  of  lenders  and  fixing  a 
different  rate  of  interest  for  them  to  charge  and  collect,  the 
pawnbroker  is  given  immediate  title  to  and  custody  of  the 
property  pledged  for  the  loan.  Said  Section  3  is  in  part  as 
follows : 

"Section  3.  A  loan  of  the  type  and  classification  to  which 
this  section  applies  is  a  loan  the  payment  of  which  is 
secured  by  the  pledge  of  tangible  personal  property,  actual 
possession  of  which  is  delivered  to  and  retained  without 
interruption  by  the  lender  himself  under  the  written  agree- 
ment of  the  parties  that  if  the  loan  is  not  paid  pursuant 
to  the  terms  of  the  loan  contract,  the  unqualified  title  to 
the  tangible  personal  property  shall  be  taken,  and  accepted 
by  the  lender  as  and  in  full  payment  and  satisfaction  of 
the  loan,  free  and  clear  of  any  right  of  redemption  in  and 
by  the  the  borrower  and  without  the  necessity  for  any 
foreclosure  of  the  pledge." 

In  the  last  paragraph  of  said  Section  3  the  rate  of  interest 
fixed  by  the  section  may  not  exceed  two  per  cent  per  month. 
This  class  engaged  in  lending  money  may  only  be  composed 
of  pawnbrokers. 

The  succeeding  Section  4  of  the  bill  points  out  another 
class  and  type  engaged  in  or  which  may  become  engaged  in 
lending  money,  and  provides  that  the  class  created  by  said 
Section  4  of  said  bill  may  charge  as  a  rate  fixed  by  said  section 
not  to  exceed  ten  per  cent  per  annum  and  such  interest  shall 
be  taken  in  advance  as  discount.  This  indicates  that  the  busi- 
ness of  conducting  a  pawnbroker  business  as  provided  for  in 
said  Section  3  fixes  a  rate  of  interest  for  the  loan  of  money 
for  a  particular  group  or  class  different  from  the  class  and 
group  created  in  said  Section  4.  The  practical  effect  of  said 
Section  3  of  said  bill  is  to  exempt  pawnbrokers  from  general 
rates  of  interest  which  said  Section  44  of  said  Article  III  of 
the  1945  Constitution  requires  to  be  fixed  alike  generally  for 
all  classes  and  groups  engaged  in  lending  money*  It  has  long 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  195 

been  recognized  before  Section  44  of  Article  III  of  the  1945 
Constitution  was  adopted  and  long  before  any  constitutional 
question  was  ever  raised  to  the  exemption  of  some  classes 
from  general  rates  of  interest  and  usury  laws,  that  Section 
15394,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  excepted  pawn- 
brokers from  the  general  statutes  as  to  usury,  because  said 
Section  15394  permitted  pawnbrokers  to  charge  two  per  cent 
per  month  on  loans  made  by  them.  This  may  not  be  done 
now  under  the  provisions  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the 
1945  Constitution.  All  classes  and  groups  engaged  in  lending 
money  must,  under  said  Section  44,  stand  upon  the  same  basis 
in  the  fixing  of  rates  of  interest  they  may  charge  by  legislative 
authority  to  make  valid  any  act  relating  to  interest. 

When  House  Bill  No.  838  provides  that  lenders  who  make 
a  certain  kind  of  loan,  which  kind  has  always  been  associated 
with  a  certain  business,  and  provides  special  rates  of  interest 
for  this  kind  of  loan,  then  said  bill  is  creating  a  special  rate 
of  interest  for  a  type  of  business. 

This  creates  a  special  class  of  money  lenders  out  of  pawn- 
brokers and  allows  them  a  different  rate  of  interest  from  that 
fixed  for  others  in  direct  conflict  with  Section  44,  Article  III 
of  the  1945  Constitution  as  well  as  Section  2  of  House  Bill 
No.  838  itself  which  declares:  "That  rates  of  interest  and 
charges  fixed  by  this  act  shall  be  applicable  generally,  and  to 
all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of  their 
business."  Said  Section  3  provides  for  a  different  rate  of 
interest  than  that  provided  for  the  classes  and  types  in  Sec- 
tions 4,  5,  6  of  House  Bill  No,  838  and,  therefore,  is  in  conflict 
with  said  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution. 

Section  4  of  House  Bill  No.  838  deals  with  a  type  and 
class  of  loans  which  authorize  the  group  or  class  of  persons 
engaged  in  lending  money  to  charge  not  to  exceed  ten  per 
cent  per  annum,  which  interest  shall  be  taken,  in  advance  as 
discount.  The  creation  of  this  class  under  said  Section  4,  and 
a  different  rate  of  interest  being  fixed  for  such  class,  different 
from  the  rate  fixed  in  Section  3  for  pawnbrokers  and  different 
from  the  rates  fixed  in  Sections  5  and  6,  conflicts  directly  with 
Section  44  of  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution*  Moreover, 
this  Section  4  excludes  from  the  class  of  loans,  a  loan  under 
a  deed  of  trust  or  mortgage  on  real  estate  and  thereby  fixes 


196  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

a  rate  of  interest  for  one  class — loans  on  personal  property — 
and  denies  a  like  rate  of  interest  by  excluding  them,  to  real 
estate  loans. 

Section  5  of  House  Bill  No.  838  creates  and  establishes  a 
type  and  classification  of  loans  which  correspond  with  any 
small  loan  business.  The  author  of  this  section  evidently  had 
in  mind  Section  8162,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
which  is  the  interest  section  of  the  small  loan  law.  Some  of 
the  same  language  is  used  in  Section  5  with  reference  to  col- 
lecting interest  on  unpaid  balances  as  is  used  in  Section  8162. 
Also,  said  Section  5  has  a  breakdown  of  the  maximum  amount 
which  shall  not  exceed  one  thousand  dollars  and  provides  for 
a  rate  of  interest  of  two  and  one-fourth  per  cent  per  month 
on  the  unpaid  principal  balance  not  exceeding  one  hundred 
dollars,  two  per  cent  per  month  on  that  part  of  the  unpaid 
principal  balance  exceeding  one  hundred  dollars  but  not  ex- 
ceeding three  hundred  dollars  and  two-thirds  of  one  per  cent 
per  month  on  that  part  of  the  unpaid  principal  balance  exceed- 
ing three  hundred  dollars  but  not  exceeding  one  thousand 
dollars. 

This  section,  in  so  stating,  creates  a  different  class  or 
group  engaged  in  lending  money  with  several  rates  of  interest 
provided  for  in  the  same  group  or  class,  all  in  conflict  with 
the  terms  of  Sections  3  and  4  of  said  House  Bill  No.  838  and 
also  in  conflict  with  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945 
Constitution. 

A  cursory  reading  of  Sections  3,  4,  and  5  discloses  that 
the  legislature  by  these  sections  have  put  back  in  business  the 
same  special  interest  lenders,  to  wit:  The  pawnbrokers,  Joan 
and  investment  lenders  and  small  loan  lenders  who  were  in 
existence  before  the  adoption  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the 
1945  Constitution  and  in  some  cases  identical  conditions  and 
provisions  that  they  had  prior  to  the  adoption  of  said  consti- 
tutional provision* 

It  is  a  mere  play  of  words  to  say  that  a  certain  class  of 
money  lenders  may  not  have  a  special  rate  of  interest  but 
that  any  person  who  makes  the  same  loan  that  was  made  by 
that  class  may  have  a  special  rate. 

Section  6  of  House  Bill  No.  838  does  not  fix  a  maximum 
for  the  amount  of  loan  to  be  made  by  the  type  and  class  of 
lenders  created  by  said  section*  It  provides  that  such  loan 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  197 

may  be  unsecured  or  secured  by  mortgage  upon  personal 
property.  Said  Section  6  does  require  that  the  interest  charged 
shall  be  paid  in  advance  as  discount  with  the  lender  giving 
the  borrower  the  option  to  repay  the  loan  at  any  time.  Said 
Section  6  further  provides  that  on  all  loans  of  the  type  and 
classification  provided  in  said  section  "interest  may  be  charged 
at  a  rate  not  to  exceed  six  per  centum  discount  per  annum 
on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount  borrowed  not  ex- 
ceeding one  thousand  dollars  and  four  per  centum  discount  per 
annum  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount  borrowed 
exceeding  one  thousand  dollars  for  the  entire  period  for  which 
the  loan  is  made,  notwithstanding  the  reduction  of  the  unpaid 
principal  amount  by  the  payment  of  installments  from  time 
to  time."  The  rates  fixed  by  this  section  are  different  from 
those  in  Sections  3,  4,  and  5  of  this  bill. 

Section  9,  like  Section  3227,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  does  provide  for  a  contract  of  interest  not  exceed- 
ing eight  per  cent.  However,  said  Section  9  goes  further  and 
says:  "but  may  not  agree  for  the  payment  of  interest  in  excess 
of  eight  per  centum  per  annum  except  as  otherwise  provided 
by  this  act." 

Section  11  shows  the  infirmities  of  Sections  3,  4,  5,  and  6 
and  also  Section  9  as  being  in  conflict  with  Section  44,  Article 
III  of  the  1945  Constitution.  Said  Section  11  provides  that 
the  rate  of  interest  permitted  in  Section  9  of  this  act  (eight 
per  cent  contract  interest)  shall  be  observed,  "except  as  pro- 
vided with  respect  to  loans  of  the  type  and  classification  set 
forth  in  Sections  3,  4,  5  and  6  of  this  act."  Said  Sections  9 
and  11  show  a  definite  conflict  between  each  of  those  sections, 
and  also  Sections  3,  4,  5,  and  6  of  said  bill,  and  also  conflict 
with  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution,  in  that 
all  of  said  sections  and  said  act,  as  a  whole,  fixes  rates  of 
interest  for  the  loan  or  use  of  money  for  particular  groups  and 
classes  engaged  in  lending  money. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  House  Bill  No.  838  is  contrary  to 
the  letter  and  spirit  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Con- 
stitution and  contrary  to  the  expressed  intention  of  the  framers 
of  the  1945  Constitution  in  enacting  said  section. 

The  intention  of  the  framers  of  the  Constitution  is  ex- 
pressed in  the  following  debate  which  appears  on  page  905  of 
the  debates  of  the  Constitutional  Convention: 


198  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"Mr.  Julian:  You  think  that  this  amendment  here  would 
have  the  effect  of  lowering  the  interest  rates  in  Missouri? 

"Mr.  McReynolds:    It  is  inevitable. 

"Mr.  Julian:  It  would  force  the  General  Assembly  to 
lower  the  interest  rate  from  the  thirty  and  thirty-six  per- 
cent down? 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  Why,  it  would  destroy  that  classifi- 
cation. It  would  put  them  all  on  a  common  ground.  The 
only  thing  that  you  could  possibly  change  was  the  six  and 
eight  which  has  prevailed  in  Missouri  for  sixty  years  any- 
way. In  my  humble  judgment  it  will  never  be  touched." 

The  lenders  are  not  put  on  common  ground  in  House  Bill 
No.  838  when  some  are  permitted  to  charge  two  per  cent  per 
month,  some  two  and  one-fourth  per  cent  per  month,  some  ten 
per  cent  per  annum  which  may  be  taken  in  advance  as  dis- 
count and  some  at  six  per  cent  discount  per  annum.  That  is 
why  the  following  sentence  was  placed  in  Section  44  of  Article 
III:  "The  rates  of  interest  fixed  by  law  shall  be  applicable 
generally  and  to  all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type  or  classi- 
fication of  their  business." 

If  it  were  the  intention  of  the  framers  of  the  Constitution 
to  lower  the  interest  rates  and  destroy  classifications,  then 
that  should  be  done  but  it  will  not  be  done  by  the  enactment 
of  House  Bill  No.  838.  If  we  are  going  to  put  all  the  lenders 
on  common  ground  then  we  should  open  the  doors  to  all  alike* 
That  is  the  intention  and  spirit  of  Section  44  of  Article  II L 
I  think  we  should  be  concerned  with  the  welfare  of  our  citizens 
in  general  rather  than  with  the  question  of  whether  or  not  a 
special  group  can  survive  if  they  are  not  permitted  to  charge 
interest  at  special  and  excessive  rates. 

Section  3  of  House  Bill  No,  838  provides  that  a  loan,  the 
payment  of  which  is  secured  by  the  pledge  of  tangible  personal 
property,  the  actual  possession  of  which  is  delivered  to  and 
retained  without  interruption  by  the  lender  himself  under  the 
written  agreement  of  the  parties  that  if  the  loan  is  not  paid 
pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  loan  contract,  the  unqualified 
title  to  the  tangible  personal  property  shall  be  taken  and 
accepted  by  the  lender  as  and  in  full  payment  and  satisfac- 
tion of  the  loan,  free  and  clear  of  any  right  of  redemption  in 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONKELLY  199 

and  by  the  borrower  and  without  the  necessity  for  any  fore- 
closure of  the  pledge. 

In  Section  15395,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
there  is  a  period  of  redemption  of  sixty  days.  It  may  be 
that  this  period  of  sixty  days  is  too  long  but  I  certainly  think 
there  should  be  a  period  of  redemption  or  some  days  of  grace 
in,  which  a  person  may  have  an  opportunity  to  redeem  the 
property  which  he  has  pledged  with  the  pawnbroker.  I  be- 
lieve this  provision  is  too  harsh  to  write  into  a  law  in  this 
particular  kind  of  a  loan  and  for  that  reason  I  object  to  it. 

I  also  object  to  the  excessive  rates  of  interest  provided 
for  in  Section  5  of  this  bill.  Loans  provided  for  in  this  sec- 
tion may  be  secured  by  a  mortgage  or  lien  on  personal  property. 
This  is  additional  security  for  the  lender.  A  loan  under  this 
section  may  be  for  as  much  as  one  thousand  dollars.  For 
instance,  if  the  loan  was  for  eight  hundred  dollars  a  rate  of 
interest  may  be  charged  on  this  loan  of  two  and  one-fourth 
per  cent  per  month  on  the  unpaid  principal  of  one  hundred 
dollars,  two  per  cent  per  month  on  the  unpaid  principal  bal- 
ance exceeding  one  hundred  dollars  and  not  exceeding  three 
hundred  dollars,  and  two-thirds  of  one  per  cent  per  month  on 
the  unpaid  principal  balance  of  the  loan.  The  interest  to  be 
computed  monthly  on  unpaid  balances.  No  provision  is  made 
for  installment  payments  in  this  section  as  is  provided  for  in 
Section  6.  We  must  not  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  during 
the  period  of  the  loan  the  borrower  is  always  paying  two  and 
one-fourth  per  cent  on  the  one  hundred  dollars  and  two  per 
cent  on  the  next  two  hundred  dollars  during  all  the  time  that 
he  is  paying  two-thirds  of  one  per  cent  per  month  on  the  bal- 
ance of  the  loan.  I  think  this  rate  of  interest  is  excessive  and 
not  justified*  The  deposits  of  money  in  the  banks  of  Mis- 
souri are  near  an  all  time  high-  It  is  generally  conceded  that 
money  is  cheaper  and  that  loans  can  be  obtained  at  a  less 
rate  of  interest  than  ever  before.  In  view  of  this  situation 
I  do  not  believe  there  is  any  justification  for  the  excessive 
rates  of  interest  provided  for  in  House  Bill  No.  838. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


200  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

NOVEMBER  9,  1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  4805-480$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
November  9,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without 
my  approval,  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  839,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Providing  that  every  person,  firm,  partnership,  and 
corporation,  both  domestic  and  foreign,  now  or  hereafter 
engaged  in  this  state  in  making  loans  of  money,  credit, 
goods  or  things  in  action,  and  who,  or  which,  charges, 
contracts  for,  or  receives  a  greater  rate  of  interest  than  8 
per  centum  per  annum  therefor  under  any  law  now  or 
hereafter  in  effect  authorizing  such  type  or  classification 
of  loan  shall  be  subject  to  the  supervisory  jurisdiction  of 
the  Commissioner  of  Finance,  or  such  agency,  or  agen- 
cies, as  may  exercise  the  powers  and  duties  now  or  here- 
inafter performed  by  such  Commissioner  hereinafter  desig- 
nated as  the  Commissioner  for  the  purposes  of  this  act* 
shall  register  and  obtain  a  Certificate  of  Registration 
before  engaging  in  the  business  of  making  such  loans; 
providing  for  the  application  and  registration  fee  to  be 
paid;  providing  for  bond  by  the  applicant;  providing  for 
the  issuance  of  the  Certificate,  where  to  be  posted;  pro- 
viding for  the  suspension,  revocation,  or  forfeiture  of  the 
Certificate  of  Registration;  requiring  the  Registrant  to 
obtain  a  certificate  for  each  place  of  business;  prohibiting 
the  Registrant  from  assigning  such  Certificate  of  Regis- 
tration; providing  for  the  powers  and  duties  of  the  Com- 
missioner of  Finance  or  such  agency  as  may  exercise  the 
powers  and  duties  now  performed  by  such  Commissioner; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  201 

authorizing  such  Commissioner  of  Finance  or  such  agency 
as  may  exercise  the  powers  and  duties  now  performed 
by  such  Commissioner  to  make  rules  and  regulations  for 
the  purpose  of  carrying  out  the  provisions  of  this  act; 
providing  for  the  enforcement  of  the  laws  of  the  State  of 
Missouri  relating  to  interest,  usury,  and  the  assignment  or 
sale  of  wages,  salaries  or  other  compensation;  providing 
that  the  registrant  shall  keep  books  and  records  in  the 
place  of  business  and  make  and  file  reports  and  be  ex- 
amined; prescribing  a  definition  of  terms;  authorizing 
such  Commissioner,  his  deputies  and  examiners,  to  inves- 
tigate or  examine  the  business  affairs  and  loans  of  any 
lender  to  which  this  act  applies;  providing  that  certain 
charges,  supervision  and  examinations  provided  for  in 
other  statutes  shall  be  in  lieu  of  the  fees,  examinations 
and  reports  required  by  this  act;  providing  for  penalties 
for  the  violation  of  any  of  the  provisions  of  this  act;  pro- 
viding that  all  laws  or  parts  of  laws  in  conflict  with  the 
provisions  of  this  act  are  hereby  repealed  with  an  emer- 
gency clause." 


Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Committee 
statute  for  House  Bill  No.  839  is  a  companion  bill  to  Senate 
Substitute  for  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill 
No,  838.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  I  vetoed  Senate  Substitute 
for  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  838,  Sen- 
ate Committee  Substitute  for  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  839  is  also  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


202  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  26,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  S31-8S2 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  26,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the   State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  23,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  3,  6  and  14  of  an  Act  of  the 
Sixty-second  General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  approved 
July  20,  1943,  appearing  in  the  Laws  of  Missouri  of  1943 
on  pages  585  to  591,  both  inclusive,  relating  to  all  bever- 
ages or  soft  drinks,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  three  new 
sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known 
as  Sections  3,  6  and  14." 

This  is  a  revision  bill.  The  intention  of  the  General 
Assembly  evidently  was  to  bring  the  sections  referred  to  in 
this  bill  up  to  date,  in  order  to  conform  to  the  law  pertaining 
to  the  new  Department  of  Revenue.  As  this  bill  also  per- 
tains to  other  departments,  the  titles  of  which  have  been 
changed  by  other  bills,  we  should  include  in  this  bill  all  revi- 
sions that  are  necessary  instead  of  doing  it  by  piecemeal 

In  Section  6,  of  Senate  Bill  No,  23,  lines  2  and  3,  ref- 
erence is  made  to  the  "State  Board  of  Health  of  Missouri/' 
The  State  Board  of  Health  was  abolished  and  discontinued 
by  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly. 
Said  Senate  Bill  No.  349  created  a  Department  of  Public 
Health  and  Welfare  and  provided  for  a  Division  of  Health 
within  this  department.  As  Senate  Bill  No*  23  is  a  later  enact- 
ment and,  therefore,  in  order  to  avoid  confusion  the  words 
"State  Board  of  Health  of  Missouri1*  should  be  stricken  out 
and  there  should  be  inserted  in  lieu  thereof  the  "Division  of 
Health  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare/* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  203 

This  same  correction  should  be  made  in  Section  14,  lines  1  and 

5  of  said  Senate  Bill  No.  23. 

The  words  "State  Board  of  Health"  as  used  in  Sections 

6  and  14  of  Senate  Bill  No.  23  would  conflict  with  Section  24 
of  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
because  Section  24  states  "the  division  of  health  shall  have 
the  power  and  duty  to  administer  all  laws,  orders  and  findings 
pertaining  to  inspection  of  beverages     .     .     .     ."     In  other 
words,  Senate  Bill  No.  23  should  conform  to  the  provisions 
of  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly. 

In  said  Section  6  of  Senate  Bill  No.  23,  in  line  8,  there 
should  be  a  comma  ","  after  the  word  "railroad." 

In  Section  3,  page  2,  line  17,  reference  is  made  to  the 
"Division  of  Collection."  If  this  bill  is  re-written  it  should 
read  "Division  of  Collection  in  the  Department  of  Revenue" 
the  same  as  appears  in  Section  14,  page  3,  lines  6  and  7.  In 
other  words,  Division  of  Collection  in  Section  3  could  be  con- 
strued to  mean,  a  Division  of  Collection  in  the  Department  of 
Public  Health  and  Welfare. 

In  this  connection  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact 
that  a  number  of  revision,  bills  have  been  enacted,  and  which 
I  have  approved  at  this  session  of  the  General  Assembly,  pro- 
viding that  taxes,  fees,  and  moneys  due  the  State  shall  be 
paid  to  the  State  Collector  of  Revenue  while  Senate  Bill  No. 
23  provides  that  fees  shall  be  paid  to  the  Division  of  Collec- 
tion in  the  Department  of  Revenue. 

Section  9  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  297  enacted  by  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  pro- 
vides that  "The  division  of  collection  shall  collect  all  taxes, 
licenses  and  fees  payable  to  the  state  .  .  .  „"  Said  Sec- 
tion 9  also  provides  "all  money  payable  to  the  state,  including 
gilts,  escheats,  penalties,  federal  funds  and  money  from  every 
other  source  payable  to  the  state  shall  be  promptly  transmitted 
to  the  division  of  collection,  *  „  .  ," 

I  think  there  should  be  uniformity  in  the  revision  of  these 
bills  and  it  occurs  to  me  that  if  other  bills  are  going  to  be 
introduced  for  the  purpose  of  correcting  statutes  pertaining 
to  the  Revenue  Department  that  the  same  designation  should 
be  made  each  time.  ReSpectfuuy  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


204  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUABY  26,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  SSS 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  26,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  36,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  8,  101  and  117  of  an  Act  of  the 
Sixty-second  General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  approved 
August  6,  1943,  appearing  in  the  Laws  of  Missouri  of 
1943  on  Pages  410  to  491,  both  inclusive,  relating  gen- 
erally to  the  organization,  powers,  duties,  liabilities  and 
matters  of  practice  of  corporations,  and  to  manufactur- 
ing and  business  companies,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof 
three  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter, 
to  be  known  as  Sections  8,  101  and  117." 

Senate  Bill  No.  36,  repeals  and  reenacts  certain  sections 
including  Section  101  of  an  Act  of  the  Sixty-second  General 
Assembly  of  Missouri,  approved  August  6,  1943,  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1943,  pages  410  to  491,  inclusive.  This  same  Section 
101  of  the  above  mentioned  act  of  the  Sixty-second  General 
Assembly  was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  511  of  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly.  A  number  of  changes  were  made  in  said  Section 
101  by  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  51 L 
If  Section  101  is  to  be  amended  it  should  be  Section  101  of 
the  Act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  as  this  is  the 
latest  act.  In  view  of  this  situation  Senate  Bill  No.  36  should 
not  be  enacted  into  law. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  in  Section  8,  page  2»  line 
19,  and  also  Section  101,  page  3,  linfcs  33  and  34,  and  Section 
117,  page  4,  line  5,  reference  is  made  to  the  payment  of  fee$ 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  205 

to  the  Director  of  Revenue.  In  my  veto  message  of  Senate 
Bill  No.  23  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  I  suggested 
that  there  should  be  uniformity  in  referring  to  the  Depart- 
ment of  Revenue.  In  Senate  Bill  No.  36  payment  is  to  be 
made  to  the  Director  of  Revenue,  in  other  bills  to  the  State 
Collector  of  Revenue  and  in  others  to  the  Division  of  Collec- 
tion. If  an  officer  is  to  be  designated  to  collect  the  fees  I 
think  it  should  be  the  State  Collector  of  Revenue  and  not  the 
Director  of  Revenue,  otherwise  it  should  be  the  Division  of 
Collection  of  the  Department  of  Revenue.  This  would  more 
nearly  conform  to  the  provisions  of  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  297. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FfcBBUABY  26,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  SS4 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  26,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval.  Senate  Bill  No,  39,  entitled : 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  5135,  Article  2,  Chapter  33  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  the  arti- 
cles of  association  of  railroad  corporations  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter  to  be  known  as  Section  5135," 


206  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

There  is  an  omission  in  Section  5135,  page  2,  line  20, 
that  requires  the  veto  of  this  bill.  In  said  line  the  words 
"fifty  dollars,"  after  the  word  "Revenue"  and  before  the  word 
"for,"  are  omitted.  The  words  "fifty  dollars"  are  in  Section 
5135,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  The  proviso  in 
this  bill  is  unworkable  and  meaningless  unless  the  words  fifty 
dollars  or  some  other  amount  is  inserted  in  line  20  after  the 
word  "Revenue"  and  before  the  word  "for." 

The  original  bill  omitted  these  words  and  it  was  not  cor- 
rected in  its  passage  through  the  two  Houses. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FfeBRUARY  26,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  347-348 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  26,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval  Senate  Bill  No,  24,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  14917  and  14931  of  the  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  public  auc- 
tioneers; and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  two  new  sections 
relating  to  the  same  subject  to  be  known  as  Sections  14917 
and  14931," 

This  is  a  revision  bill  and  attempts  to  amend  Sections 
14917  and  14931,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  to  make 
them  conform  to  the  law  pertaining  to  the  Department  of 
Revenue. 


GOVEBNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  207 

In  Section  14917,  lines  6  and  7,  the  words  "state  collector 
of  revenue"  are  inserted  in  lieu  of  the  words  '  'state  auditor" 
which  now  appear  in  said  section  of  the  1939  Statutes.  In 
Section  14931,  lines  3  and  4,  the  words  "state  collector  of  reve- 
nue" are  inserted  in  lieu  of  the  words  "state  auditor"  and 
"auditor"  which  appear  in  Section  14931  of  the  1939  Statutes. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  word  "comptroller"  should  be 
used  instead  of  the  words  "state  collector  of  revenue"  for  the 
reason  that  Section  38  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  297  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  pro- 
vides "The  comptroller  shall  keep  an  account  of  all  debits 
and  credits  between  the  state  and  the  United  States,  or  any 
officer  or  person  or  persons,  partnerships,  associations  or  cor- 
porations with  whom  the  state  may  have  dealings  .  .  .  ." 
Said  Section  14917  of  Senate  Bill  No.  24  is  definitely  a  book- 
keeping or  record  section  and  not  a  collection  section,  and  the 
comptroller  should  keep  this  record  instead  of  the  State  Col- 
lector of  Revenue. 

In  fact,  instead  of  trying  to  amend  that  part  of  Sections 
14917  and  14931  pertaining  to  the  certification,  and  charging 
to  collector  with  the  amount  rendered,  said  part  of  said  sec- 
tions should  be  repealed  outright.  Inquiry  at  the  State  Au- 
ditor's office  reveals  the  fact  that  no  money  ever  has  been  paid 
to  the  State  of  Missouri  by  reason  of  the  provisions  contained 
in  Chapter  116,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  pertain- 
ing to  public  auctioneers.  No  doubt  one  of  the  reasons  for 
this  is  because  Section  14927,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  declares  what  sales  of  property  at  auction  shall  be  free 
of  duty,  which  section  includes  practically  every  kind  of  real 
and  personal  property  that  is  sold  at  public  auction. 

Attention  should  also  be  called  to  the  fact  that  the  license 
referred  to  in  this  chapter  is  a  county  license  and  not  a  State 
license  and  the  only  part  that  the  State  is  to  receive  is  the 
duty  provided  for  in  Section  14924,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  and  as  above  stated,  this  duty  does  not  apply  to 
sales  of  property  at  auction  which  are  free  of  duty. 

I  think  Senate  Bill  No.  24  would  have  no  effect  other  than 
to  clutter  up  the  statutes  with  another  bill  that  is  inoperative, 
It  is  my  opinion  that  instead  of  trying  to  revise  Sections  14917 
and  14931,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  that  the -entire 


208  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Chapter  116,  relating  to  public  auctioneers,  should  be  revised 
and  brought  up  to  date. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  407-608 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  17,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  56,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  9098,  Article  5,  Chapter  48  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  the  earn- 
ing fund  and  revolving  fund  of  the  Missouri  State  Peni- 
tentiary, and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  one  new  section, 
relating  to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as 
Section  9098." 

This  is  a  revision  bill.  The  intention  of  the  General  Assem- 
bly evidently  was  to  revise  Section  9098  to  make  it  comply 
with  the  provisions  of  the  new  Revenue  Department- 

However,  since  the  section  is  to  be  revised  it  should  be 
brought  up  to  date  in,  every  particular  and  not  just  a  part  of 
the  section.  For  instance,  on  page  2  of  Section  9098,  lines  8f 
12,  22,  25,  and  26,  the  words  "said  board,"  "prison  board" 
or  "the  board"  are  referred  to,  This  has  reference  to  the  old 
Board  of  Penal  Commissioners  which  was  known  as  the  Com* 
missioners  of  the  Department  of  Penal  Institutions-  This 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  209 

board  or  commission  was  abolished  and  discontinued  by  Sen- 
ate Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  347  of  the  Sixty- 
third  General  Assembly  and  all  of  the  duties  and  powers  of 
said  board  were  vested  in  the  Department  of  Corrections,  to 
be  administered  by  the  Director  of  the  Department  of 
Corrections. 

If  Senate  Bill  No.  56  had  not  been  introduced  and  if  no 
change  had  been  made  in  Section  9098,  then  the  reference  to 
the  board  in  Section  9098  would  be  governed  by  the  provisions 
of  Section  1  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  347  and  would  be  so  construed.  However,  if  Senate  Bill 
No.  56  were  enacted,  the  use  of  the  word  "board"  would  be 
erroneous  and  confusing  because  it  is  a  later  act  and  is  recog- 
nizing a  board  that  has  been  abolished. 

Since  this  is  a  revision  bill,  I  think  we  should  revise  the 
entire  section  and  not  just  a  part  of  it. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  408-409 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  17,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  57,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  621,  622,  623,  624,  632,  634,  640 
and  641  of  Article  I,  Chapter  3  of  the  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  escheats,  and  to  enact  in 
lieu  thereof  eight  new  sections  to  be  known  as  Sections 
621,  622,  623,  624,  632,  634,  640  and  641." 


210  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Sections  632,  634  and  641,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  are  included  in  Senate  Bill  No.  57. 

This  bill  passed  the  Senate,  according  to  the  journal,  on 
January  28,  1947.  On  the  day  before,  January  27,  1947,  the 
Senate  passed  Senate  Bill  No.  17,  which  repealed  and  reenacted 
these  same  Sections  632,  634,  and  641. 

The  wording  of  Section  632  of  Senate  Bill  No.  17  is  prac- 
tically the  same  as  the  wording  of  Section  632  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  57,  except  that  in  Senate  Bill  No.  17,  commencing  in  line 
4  of  said  section,  it  states:  "The  comptroller  shall,  when  such 
certificate  of  the  clerk  is  filed  in  his  office,  certify  the  claim 
to  the  state  auditor,  who  shall  issue  a  warrant  therefor  on  the 
state  treasurer  .  .  .  ,"  while  Section  632  of  Senate  Bill  No. 
57  states:  'The  state  comptroller  shall,  when  such  certificate 
of  the  clerk  is  filed  in  his  office,  approve  for  issuance  a  warrant 
therefor  on  the  state  treasurer  .  .  .  ." 

In  other  words,  in  Senate  Bill  No.  17,  the  claim  is  certi- 
fied to  the  State  Auditor,  while  in  Senate  Bill  No.  57  no  ref- 
erence is  made  to  the  State  Auditor. 

In  Section  634  of  Senate  Bill  No.  57,  in  line  4,  the  record 
and  process  referred  to  shall  be  deposited  in  the  office  of  the 
State  Comptroller,  while  in  Section  634  of  Senate  Bill  No.  17 
the  record  and  process  shall  be  deposited  in  the  office  of  the 
Director  of  Revenue. 

In  Section  641  of  Senate  Bill  No.  57,  it  states  that  the 
Comptroller  shall  keep  just  and  accurate  account  of  all  money 
paid  to  the  State  Collector  of  Revenue,  while  Section  641  of 
Senate  Bill  No.  17  states  that  the  Comptroller  shall  keep  just 
and  accurate  account  of  all  money  paid  into  the  State  Treasury. 

If  Senate  Bill  No.  57  were  approved  we  would  have  a 
situation  where  three  sections  of  the  statutes,  to  wit;  Sec- 
tions 632,  634,  and  641,  were  repealed  and  reenacted  at  the 
same  session  of  the  General  Assembly  and  in  fact  within  one 
day  of  each  other  in  the  Senate,  the  provisions  of  each  being 
different  which,  in  my  opinion,  would  cause  endless  confusion, 
No  reference  is  made  in  Senate  Bill  No.  57  to  the  same  sec- 
tions in  Senate  Bill  No.  17. 

If  the  other  sections  in  Senate  Bill  No,  57  are  to  be  re- 
vised, I  think  the  safer  plan  would  be  to  include  them  in  a 
new  bill  and  if  Sections  632,  634,  and  641  are  to  be  changed 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  211 

in  any  way  from  their  present  wording  in  Senate  Bill  No.  17 
they,  also,  can  be  included  in  a  new  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MABCH  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  409-410 

EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  17,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  59,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9954  and  9955  of  the  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  inspection  of 
hotels,  inns,  boarding  houses,  tourist  camps  and  resorts 
and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  two  new  sections  relating  to 
the  same  subject  matter  to  be  known  as  Sections  9954 
and  9955." 

In  Sections  9955,  lines  1,  13,  14,  and  21,  reference  is  made 
to  the  State  Board  of  Health  and  the  Secretary  of  the  State 
Board  of  Health. 

The  State  Board  of  Health  was  abolished  and  discontinued 
by  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
and  all  the  powers  and  duties  of  the  State  Board  of  Health 
were  vested  in  and  to  be  administered  through  the  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Health  and  Welfare.  There  is  no  Secretary 
of  the  State  Board  of  Health  but  there  is  a  Director  of  the 
Division  of  Health, 


212  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

If  no  change  were  made  in  Section  9955,  the  terms  "State 
Board  of  Health"  and  "Secretary  of  the  State  Board  of 
Health"  would  be  governed  by  Section  23  of  Senate  Bill  No. 
349  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  which  provides: 

"Section  23.  All  powers  and  duties  heretofore  exercised 
by  the  state  board  of  health  pertaining  to  inspection  of  hotels, 
inns  and  boarding  houses,  shall  be  exercised  by  the  division 
of  health  and  may  be  delegated  by  the  director  of  the  division 
of  health  to  a  deputy  who  may  be  the  deputy  of  food  and  drug 
administration  and  who,  under  the  director,  shall  be  chiefly 
responsible  for  the  administration  of  laws,  orders  and  findings 
relating  to  the  inspection  of  hotels,  inns  and  boarding  houses." 

However,  as  Senate  Bill  No.  59  is  a  revision  bill  and  is 
intended  to  bring  the  section  up  to  date,  we  should  use  cor- 
rect titles  and  where  the  words  "State  Board  of  Health"  are 
referred  to  they  should  be  the  "Division  of  Health  in  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare." 

For  these  reasons  this  bill  is  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  Cm; 
March  17,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  62,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  213 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9908  and  9914  of  Article  4,  Chap- 
ter 58  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relat- 
ing to  egg  license  fees,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  two 
new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be 
known  as  Sections  9908  and  9914." 

This  is  a  revision  bill  The  intention  of  the  General 
Assembly  evidently  was  to  bring  the  sections  referred  to  in 
this  bill  up  to  date  in  order  to  conform  to  the  law  pertaining 
to  the  new  Department  of  Revenue. 

However,  in  order  to  correctly  revise  the  bill  and  bring 
it  up  to  date  the  reference  to  the  State  Food  and  Drug  Com- 
missioner on  page  2,  Section  9908,  lines  7  and  8,  and  also  in 
Section  9914,  lines  7,  8,  9,  15,  20,  and  21  should  be  stricken 
out  and  the  proper  reference  to  the  Department  of  Public 
Health  and  Welfare  inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

In  other  words,  the  office  of  Food  and  Drug  Commissioner 
was  abolished  in  1933  and  the  duties  transferred  to  the  State 
Board  of  Health.  The  State  Board  of  Health  was  abolished 
and  discontinued  by  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  and  all  the  powers  and  duties  of  the  State  Board 
of  Health  were  vested  in  and  to  be  administered  through  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare.  Section  23  of 
Senate  Bill  No,  349  provides  in  substance  that  all  powers  and 
duties  heretofore  exercised  by  the  State  Board  of  Health  per- 
taining to  the  inspection  of  hotels,  inns,  and  boarding  houses 
shall  be  exercised  by  the  Division  of  Health  and  may  be  dele- 
gated by  the  director  to  a  deputy  who  may  be  the  deputy  of 
food  and  drug  administration,  etc.  In  other  words,  if  we  are 
going  to  revise  these  sections  as  to  one  department,  to-wit, 
the  Revenue  Department,  we  should  also  revise  them  as  to 
all  other  departments  which  are  affected.  This  will  avoid 
confusion  in  trying  to  interpret  and  construe  the  latest  acts 
of  the  General  Assembly* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


214  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  17,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  1,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  appointment  of  six  supreme  court 
commissioners,  declaring  them  to  be  judicial  officers,  pre- 
scribing their  qualifications,  the  manner  of  their  appoint- 
ment, and  their  duties,  and  fixing  their  tenure,  retirement 
and  compensation,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

In  lines  11  to  22,  inclusive,  Section  1,  page  1,  there  is 
the  following  provision: 

"Such  commissioners  are  hereby  declared  to  be  judges 
and  judicial  officers  within  the  meaning  of  and  subject  to 
the  provisions  of  Article  V  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri 
and  all  laws  enacted  pursuant  thereto  and  shall  receive 
the  same  salary  and  compensation,  payable  in  the  same 
manner,  as  is  now  or  hereafter  provided  by  law  to  be 
paid  to  and  received  by  the  judges  of  the  Supreme  Court. 
If  any  commissioner  die,  resign,  be  removed,  or  be  retired 
under  the  Constitution  and  laws  relating  thereto,  the 
vacancy  so  created  shall  be  filled  by  appointment  by  said 
court  in  the  manner  herein  provided  for  the  appointment 
of  original  commissioners;  .  *  ." 

A  part  of  this  section  is  new  matter  and  has  not  been  con- 
tained in  any  other  bill  pertaining  to  the  appointment  of  com- 
missioners of  the  Supreme  Court. 

Said  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No,  1  provides  that  the 
Supreme  Court  commissioners  are  to  be  judges  within  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  215 

meaning  of  and  subject  to  the  provisions  of  Article  V  of  the 
Constitution  of  Missouri.  In  other  words,  these  commis- 
sioners are  to  be  on  the  same  level  as  the  regular  judges  of 
the  Supreme  Court.  Section  2  of  Article  V  of  the  1945  Con- 
stitution limits  the  number  of  judges  on  the  Supreme  Court 
to  seven.  This  section  reads  in  part,  "It  (the  court)  shall  be 
composed  of  seven  judges  .  .  .  ."  If  the  six  Supreme  Court 
commissioners  were  declared  to  be  judges,  the  number  of  judges 
on  the  court  would  then,  be  raised  to  thirteen  in  direct  viola- 
tion of  the  limitation  imposed  by  the  Constitution.  The  very 
word  "judge"  contemplates  a  person  elected  by  the  people  or 
selected  under  the  non-partisan  court  plan  rather  than  the 
person  who  is  appointed  by  a  court  to  assist  that  court  in  its 
judicial  duties. 

It  is  also  provided  in  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No.  1  that 
other  commissioners  may  be  appointed  "if  any  commissioner 
die,  resign,  be  removed,  or  be  retired  under  the  Constitution 
and  laws  relating  thereto."  That  clause  indicates  that  the 
commissioners  are  to  be  retired  under  the  Constitution  and, 
therefore,  is  entirely  inconsistent  with  Section  27  of  Article  V 
of  the  1945  Constitution.  Said  Section  27  is  as  follows: 

"Section  27.  Any  judge  of  a  court  of  record  or  magis- 
trate who  is  unable  to  discharge  the  duties  of  his  office 
with  efficiency  by  reason  of  continued  sickness  or  phy- 
sical or  mental  infirmity  shall  be  retired  from  the  office 
by  order  of  a  committee  composed  of  three  judges  of  the 
supreme  court,  one  judge  of  each  of  the  courts  of  appeals, 
and  three  circuit  judges,  elected  by  the  judges  of  the 
respective  courts,  after  notice  and  a  fair  hearing  and  on 
a  finding  of  two-thirds  of  the  committee  that  the  dis- 
ability is  permanent.  The  judge  so  retired  shall  receive 
one-half  his  regular  compensation  until  the  end  of  his 
term  of  office.  The  supreme  court  shall  prescribe  rules 
of  procedure  under  this  section," 

The  corresponding  section  in  the  1875  Constitution  provided 
for  the  outright  removal  of  the  judges  because  of  their  inability 
and  required  a  two-thirds  vote  of  each  House  of  the  General 
Assembly  and  the  approval  of  the  Governor  for  such  removal- 
The  debates  of  the  Constitutional  Convention  which 
framed  the  1945  Constitution  show  that  the  general  belief  of 


216  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  delegates  of  that  Convention  was  that  the  old  method  of 
removal  was  too  cumbersome  and  should  be  changed. 

These  debates  also  disclose  that  the  primary  purpose  of 
this  provision  was  to  provide  a  means  of  removing  judges  from 
the  bench  because  of  their  inability  to  perform  their  judicial 
duties.  There  was  no  discussion  in  the  debates  to  the  effect 
that  this  section  was  to  provide  a  retirement  plan  for  the 
judges  except,  of  course,  as  an  incident  of  their  removal. 

The  commissioners  are  appointed  by  the  Supreme  Court 
and  can  be  removed  by  the  Supreme  Court  of  its  own  motion. 
The  commissioners  were  not  included  in  Section  27,  Article  V 
of  the  Constitution.  I  think  there  is  no  question  but  what 
Section  27  of  Article  V  of  the  1945  Constitution  did  not  con- 
template the  inclusion  of  Supreme  Court  commissioners  under 
its  provisions.  The  attempt  in  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No.  1 
to  provide  that  Supreme  Court  commissioners  may  be  retired 
under  the  provisions  of  Article  V  of  the  Constitution  is  incon- 
sistent with  the  provisions  of  said  Section  27  of  Article  V,  It 
is  my  opinion  that  Senate  Bill  No.  1  conflicts  with  Sections  2 
and  27  of  Article  V  of  the  Constitution  and  is  unconstitutional 

I  also  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  Senate  Bill  No,  % 
of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly,  providing  for  the 
appointment  of  commissioners  for  the  St»  Louis  Court  of 
Appeals,  does  not  have  a  retirement  provision,  I  have  this 
day  approved  Senate  Bill  No.  2.  If  the  above  provision  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  1  were  constitutional  then  it  should  have  been 
included  in  Senate  Bill  No.  2,  and  also  the  bill  providing  for 
the  appointment  of  the  commissioners  of  the  Kansas  City 
Court  of  Appeals,  so  that  the  commissioners  of  all  the  appellate 
courts  would  be  on  an  equal  basis. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  have  vetoed  this  bill 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M-  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  217 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  18, 1947 
From  the  Journal  af  the  Senate,  pp.  488-483 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  18,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  48,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  14303-d  of  an  Act  of  the  Sixty- 
first  General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  approved  June  28, 
1941,  providing  for  an  apple  merchandising  fund,  appear- 
ing in  Laws  of  Missouri  of  1941  on  pages  305  to  310,  both 
inclusive,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  relat- 
ing to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Section 
14303-d." 

This  is  a  revision  bill*  However,  it  only  partially  revises 
Section  14303-d.  Commencing  in  line  14  on  page  2,  the  bill 
refers  to  the  disposition  of  the  unexpended  balance  in  the 
Apple  Merchandising  Fund  at  the  end  of  the  biennium.  In 
lines  17  and  18,  it  is  stated  that  this  balance  shall  be  exempt 
from,  the  provisions  of  Section  13051,  Article  1,  Chapter  87, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  (1939),  However,  Section  13051, 
Article  1,  Chapter  87  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  was  repealed  by  Senate  Bill  No.  448  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly. 

An  entirely  new  bill  was  enacted  relating  to  the  office  of 
State  Treasurer  and  the  treasury  department,  said  bill  being 
Senate  Bill  No.  237  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly. 

This  bill  (Senate  Bill  No.  237)  does  not  carry  any  of  the 
old  section  numbers  of  Article  1,  Chapter  87,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  but  those  who  are  interested  in  the  subject 
matter  of  Section  13051,  which  was  repealed  by  Senate  Bill 


218  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

No.  448,  may  find  its  provisions  in  Section  17  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  237  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  Senate  Bill  No.  48,  in  lines  14  to 
20,  inclusive,  provides  for  the  exemption  of  the  unexpended 
balance  in  the  Apple  Merchandising  Fund  at  the  end  of  the 
biennium  from  the  provisions  of  Section  13051,  and  in  view  of 
the  fact  that  said  Section,  13051  has  been  repealed  and  no 
reference  whatever  made  to  the  provisions  of  Section  17  of 
Senate  Bill  No.  237,  and  the  fact  that  I  am  of  the  opinion  that 
the  General  Assembly  did  not  intend  to  repeal  this  exemption 
provision  in  Senate  Bill  No.  48  but  simply  overlooked  the 
fact  that  Section  13051  had  been  repealed,  I  think  this  bill 
should  be  vetoed  so  that  it  can  be  correctly  written. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  18, 1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Semite,  pp. 


EXBCUTIVB  OFFICE,  STATB  OF  Missoxrai,  JEFFERSON  Cn% 
March  18,  1047. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No*  49,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  7895  of  Article  1,  Chapter  39, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  the 
examination  of  banks  and  trust  companies,  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter,  to  be  known  as  Section  7895." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  219 

The  words  "of  the  state  auditor"  which  appear  in  Section 
7895,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  are  omitted  in  Sen- 
ate Bill  No.  49,  page  4,  line  101.  Said  Section  7895  of  the 
1939  Statutes  reads:  "by  warrant  of  the  state  auditor  upon 
the  state  treasurer."  Senate  Bill  No.  49  in  lines  100,  101,  and 
102,  reads:  "shall  be  made  upon  the  certificate  of  the  com- 
missioner, by  warrant  upon  the  state  treasurer." 

I  think  the  omission  of  the  words  "of  the  state  auditor" 
vitally  affects  this  bill.     In  fact  Section  43a  of  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  297  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly  provides  a  procedure  for  the  allowance  and 
payment   of  claims   against   the   State.     Said   Section  43a, 
among  other  things,  provides:    "the  comptroller  shall  fill  in 
on  a  form  of  warrant  the  amount  due  and  other  necessary 
information.    The  form  of  the  warrant  thus  filled  in  by  the 
comptroller  shall  be  transmitted  with  the  comptroller's  certi- 
fication to  the  state  auditor.    Upon  being  signed  by  the  audi- 
tor, it  shall  become  the  warrant  of  the  auditor."    A  form  of 
warrant  upon  the  State  Treasurer  is  set  out  in  the  statute. 
The  procedure  set  forth  in  lines  100,  101,  and  102  of  Sen- 
ate Bill  No.  49,  wherein  claims  for  salary  and  expenses  shall 
be  made  upon  the  certification  of  the  commissioner,  by  warrant 
upon  the  State  Treasurer  conflicts  with  the  procedure  set  forth 
in  Section  43a  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  297  and  would  be  a  different  procedure  than  is  now  fol- 
lowed under  Section  7895  of  the  1939  Statutes  and  would  be 
in  conflict  with  Section  43a  as  above  mentioned. 
For  the  above  reasons  this  bill  is  vetoed. 
In  view  of  the  fact  that  this  bill  is  not  approved,  I  call 
attention  to  lines  94  to  97,  inclusive,  wherein  reference  is  made 
to  sums  collected  from  banks,  etc.,  shall  be  paid  "to  the  state 
collector  of  revenue  who  shall  deposit  the  same  into  the  state 
treasury  to  be  credited  to  the  division  of  finance  of  the  depart- 
ment of  business  and  administration."    This  is  contrary  to 
the  provisions  of  Section  7895  for  the  reason  that  such  sums 
are  to  be  credited  to  the  State  Finance  Department  Fund,  which 
fund  is  now  set  up  in  the  Treasurer's  office.    Senate  Bill  No, 
49,  lines  96  and  97,  in  providing  that  such  sums  shall  be 
credited  to  the  Division  of  Finance  of  the  Department  of  Busi- 
ness and  Administration  would,  no  doubt,  be  construed  to 
mean  a  different  fund  and  the  General  Assembly  in  enacting 


220  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

appropriation  bills  would  have  to  appropriate  from  both  the 
State  Finance  Department  Fund  and  from  the  sums  credited 
to  the  Division  of  Finance  of  the  Department  of  Business  and 
Administration. 

I  am  not  vetoing  this  bill  on  account  of  the  above  pro- 
vision, as  this  is  a  matter  of  legislation  and  if  the  General 
Assembly  wants  to  make  such  a  provision  it  has  a  right  to 
do  so,  but  I  call  it  to  your  attention  because  from  a  practical 
standpoint  I  believe  it  will  cause  confusion. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MAJBOH  28, 1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hvuse  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  28,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Hotise  Bill  No,  169,  entitled: 
"AN  ACT 

'To  appropriate  money  for  the  support  of  the  state 
government  and  the  payment  of  salaries,  wages  and  per 
diem  of  the  officers  and  employees  and  for  other  expenses 
of  certain  departments,  bureaus,  boards  and  commissions 
of  the  state  government,  for  the  period  beginning  January 
£,  1947  and  ending  June  30,  1947;  these  amounts  being 
in  addition,  to  the  amounts  appropriated  for  a  like  period 
for  the  same  purposes  in  House  Bill  988,  an  act  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  approved  July  17,  1946,  House 
Bill  989,  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  approved 
August  1,  1946,  and  House  Bill  990,  an  act  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly,  approved  July  18,  1946*1* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  221 

and  appended  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  follow- 
ing statement  of  the  item  to  which  I  object,  which  item  is 
returned  without  my  approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  stated, 
which  said  reasons  accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections 
to  said  item. 

Section  8  of  House  Bill  No.  169,  provides  for  an  appro- 
priation chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund  of  $4,000.00 
for  bounties  for  the  destruction  of  wolves,  coyotes,  and 
wildcats. 

There  is  no  recommendation  in  the  Executive  Budget  for 
an  emergency  appropriation  for  this  purpose.  Section  25,  Arti- 
cle IV  of  the  1945  Constitution  provides: 

"Section  25.  Until  it  acts  on  all  the  appropriations 
recommended  in  the  budget,  neither  house  of  the  general 
assembly  shall  pass  any  appropriation  other  than  emer- 
gency appropriations  recommended  by  the  governor." 

In  view  of  the  limitation  contained  in  the  above  consti- 
tutional provision  on  the  power  of  appropriation  by  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  and  the  fact  that  no  emergency  appropriation 
was  recommended  by  the  Governor  for  said  purpose,  said  sum 
of  $4,000.00  is  not  approved. 

The  amounts  in  Sections  1  to  7,  inclusive,  of  House  Bill 
No.  169  are  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


222  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  4,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  502-503 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  4,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  113,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  10112  and  10120,  Chapter  66, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  State 
Board  of  Optometry,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  two  new 
sections  relating  to  the  same  subject  to  be  known  as 
Sections  10112  and  10120." 

Senate  Bill  No.  113  repeals  and  reenacts  Sections  10112 
and  10120,  Chapter  66,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 
However,  Section  10120  was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  an 
act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly,  which  act  is  found  in  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  973  to  976,  inclusive. 

Section  10120  of  Senate  Bill  No.  113,  lines  10  to  16,  inclu- 
sive, provides  that  "a  registered  optometrist  or  a  registered 
apprentice  whose  certificate  of  registration  has  expired  may 
have  his  certificate  of  registration  restored  only  upon  payment 
of  the  required  restoration  fee.  Any  registered  optometrist 
who  retires  from  the  practice  of  optometry  for  not  more  than 
five  (5)  years  may  renew  his  certificate  of  registration  upon 
payment  of  all  lapsed  renewal  fees/' 

This  Section  10120,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  an  act  of  the  62nd  General 
Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  974.  The  1943  act 
sought  to  raise  the  standards  required  of  registered  optom- 
etrists who  were  seeking  renewal  of  their  certificates  of  regis- 
tration by  providing  that  a  registered  optometrist  who  per- 
mitted his  certificate  to  expire  could  renew  the  same  within 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  223 

five  years  of  the  date  of  expiration  upon  the  payment  of  the 
required  restoration  fee  and  in  addition  presenting  satisfactory 
evidence  to  the  State  Board  of  Optometry  of  his  attendance 
during  said  five  years  at  educational  optometric  programs  or 
their  equivalent  and  provided  that  said  educational  programs 
or  their  equivalent  were  approved  by  the  State  Board  of 
Optometry, 

The  intention  of  Senate  Bill  No.  113  evidently  was  to 
make  Section  10112  and  Section  10120  comply  with  the  new 
revenue  law.  In  other  words,  it  was  a  revision  bill.  The 
proposed  changes  in  said  two  sections  of  the  bill  are  in  heavy 
type  which,  under  the  custom  which  has  been  followed  in 
regard  to  revision  bills,  meant  there  were  no  other  changes 
in  the  present  law  except  the  changes  set  out  in  heavy  type. 
No  reference  is  made  to  the  fact  that  a  part  of  the  1943  act 
is  omitted.  The  present  law  is  not  what  is  contained  in 
Section  10120  of  Senate  Bill  No,  113  but  the  present  law  is 
set  forth  in  Section  10120  of  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943, 
at  page  974.  The  subject  matter  in  Section  10120  of  Senate 
Bill  No.  113  is  different  from  the  subject  matter  contained  in 
the  1943  act. 

If  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  113  are  to  be  the  last 
enactment  on  this  subject  matter,  then  I  think  the  legislature 
should  have  an  opportunity  to  say  whether  or  not  the  pro- 
visions of  the  1943  act,  above  mentioned,  in  regard  to  regis- 
tered optometrists  presenting  satisfactory  evidence  to  the  State 
Board  of  Optometry  of  attendance  during  said  five  year  period 
at  educational  optometric  programs  or  their  equivalent,  should 
be  included  in  said  section. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  Senate  Bill 
No.  113* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


224  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS   OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  16,  1947 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  9Q6-968 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

May  16,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  135,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  revision,  digest  and  promulga- 
tion of  the  statute  laws  of  this  state  in  the  year  1949, 
and  to  provide  for  revision,  digest  and  promulgation  of 
such  laws  in  future  years  with  an  emergency  clause." 

Section  34,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution  provides: 
"In  the  year  1949  and  at  least  every  ten  years  thereafter  all 
general  statute  laws  shall  be  revised,  digested  and  promul- 
gated as  provided  by  law.  .  .  ," 

This  provision  of  the  Constitution  states  "in  the  year 
1949."  It  does  not  state  in  the  year  1947  or  in  the  year  1948. 

It  also  states  that  "all  general  statute  laws  shall  be  re- 
vised,  digested  and  promulgated  as  provided  by  law." 

What  does  revised  mean?  In  the  case  of  Fidelity  and 
Columbia  Trust  Company  vs.  Meek  (Ky,)  171  S.  W.  2d  41, 
L  c.  44,  the  Court  said: 

"A  revision  contemplates  a  redrafting  and  simplification 
of  the  entire  body  of  statute  law.  It  involves  the  elimi- 
nation of  duplications,  contradictions,  obsolete  and  obso- 
lescent provisions,  redundant,  tautological,  prolix  and  ver- 
bose provisions.  A  revision  is  a  complete  restatement  of 
the  law.  It  requires  enactment  by  the  legislature  in  order 
to  be  effective  and  upon  enactment  it  becomes  the  law 
itself,  replacing  all  former  statutes*"  (Underscoring  mine) 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  225 

See  also  59  C.  J.  888. 

The  statutes  cannot  be  revised  except  by  the  legislature 
itself. 

The  word  "digest"  means  to  arrange,  classify,  codify. 
That  is  not  a  legislative  matter  and  can  be  carried  on  by  a 
committee  or  other  authorized  agency  outside  the  legislature. 

The  word  "promulgate"  means  to  publish,  a  matter  of 
publication.  The  publication  can  be  done  under  legislative 
direction,  such  as  by  an  independent  committee  constituted 
and  authorized  by  the  General  Assembly. 

After  the  Statutes  have  been  "revised"  by  the  General 
Assembly  in  1949  they  then  can  be  digested  and  promulgated. 

Various  sections  of  Senate  Bill  No.  135  provide  for  the 
Committee  on  Legislative  Research  to  collate,  compile,  arrange, 
classify  and  codify  for  publication  the  laws  and  statutes  of 
this  State,  including  the  laws  passed  by  the  Sixty-fifth  General 
Assembly.  It  is  my  opinion  that  that  part  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  135  regarding  such  collating,  compilation,  arrangement, 
classification  and  codification  for  publication  is  premature  at 
this  time  and  is  an  attempt  on  the  part  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly  to  enact  a  law  which  would  be  binding  on 
the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly,  and  specifies  what  action  is 
to  be  taken  and  by  whom  such  action  is  to  be  taken  in  the 
year  1949. 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  vs.  Smith,  125  S.  W.  2d  883, 
1.  c.  885,  the  Missouri  Supreme  Court  stated:  "It  is  elemen- 
tary that  no  general  assembly  can,  by  mere  enactment,  cut 
down  the  legislative  power  of  any  of  its  successors." 

Under  the  provisions  of  Section  34,  Article  III  of  the 
1945  Constitution  of  Missouri,  providing  that  "in  the  year 
1949  and  at  least  every  ten  years  thereafter  all  general  statute 
laws  shall  be  revised,  digested  and  promulgated  as  provided 
by  law,"  it  is  my  opinion  that  it  is  the  duty  of  the  Sixty-fifth 
General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  rather  than  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly,  to  enact  whatever  legislation  is  necessary 
and  proper  to  carry  out  such  mandate  of  the  Constitution 
with  regard  to  the  collation,  compilation,  arrangement,  classi- 
fication and  codification  for  publication  of  the  Revised  Statutes 
of  1949. 

Section  12  of  Senate  Bill  No.  135  provides: 


226  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"The  Committee  shall  appoint  and  fix  the  compensation 
of  a  Reviser  of  Statutes  and  such  other  attorneys  and 
employees  as  it  finds  necessary  to  carry  out  the  provi- 
sions of  this  act,  and  such  compensation  and  other  ex- 
penses incurred  in  connection  therewith  shall  be  paid  from 
appropriations  made  for  the  Committee  on  Legislative 
Research." 

I  think  this  provision  with  reference  to  the  appointment 
and  compensation  of  a  Reviser  of  Statutes  and  the  employ- 
ment of  attorneys  and  employees  prior  to  the  1949  session  of 
the  General  Assembly  is  an  unauthorized  expense  and  in  con- 
flict with  the  intent  and  purpose  of  Section  34,  Article  III  of 
the  1945  Constitution. 

It  is  also  my  opinion  that  the  duties  set  forth  for  the 
Reviser  of  Statutes  duplicate  and  overlap  the  duties  of  the 
Legislative  Research  Committee  and  much  confusion  would 
result  therefrom. 

I  think  that  certain  preliminary  work  should  be  done 
prior  to  the  1949  session  of  the  General  Assembly  so  that  in 
1949  the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly  will  be  prepared  to 
revise,  digest,  and  promulgate  the  1949  Statutes.  Section  1 
of  Senate  Bill  No.  135  has  some  good  provisions.  It  authorizes 
the  Committee  on  Legislative  Research  to  prepare  and  have 
ready  for  submission  to  the  Sixty-fifth  General  Assembly  pro- 
posed legislative  enactments  which  will  eliminate  from  the 
1949  edition  of  the  Revised  Statutes,  all  duplicate,  obsolete, 
conflicting,  unconstitutional,  and  ambiguous  statutes. 

I  think  this  is  a  very  necessary  work  and  that  the  General 
Assembly  should  request  the  Committee  on  Legislative  Re- 
search to  prepare  such  legislative  enactments.  I  think  this 
can  be  done  by  the  General  Assembly  by  resolution  and  that 
it  is  not  necessary  to  enact  a  bill  in  order  to  have  it  done* 
I  refer  you  to  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  633  to  038,  inclu- 
sive, pertaining  to  the  authority  and  jurisdiction  of  the  Com- 
mittee on  Legislative  Research. 

I  realize  that  the  argument  probably  will  be  made  as  set 
forth  in  the  emergency  clause  (Section  19)  that  the  work  in 
connection  with  the  1949  revision  must  be  begun  at  the  earliest 
possible  date,  I  agree  that  all  work  that  c&n  legally  be  done 
should  be  done  at  the  earliest  possible  date.  However,  I  do 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  227 

not  believe  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  has  any  author- 
ity to  authorize  the  1949  revision  of  the  statutes  in  the  year 
1947,  especially  in  view  of  the  provision  in  Section  34  of  Arti- 
cle III  of  the  1945  Constitution.  I  think  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly  does  have  authority  to  authorize  prelimi- 
nary work  as  above  indicated  for  the  purpose  of  expediting 
the  revision  work  of  the  1949  General  Assembly,  and  I  am  in 
favor  of  approving  the  necessary  expense  in  connection  with 
such  preliminary  work. 

With  reference  to  the  emergency  clause  (Section  19)  I  do 
not  believe  there  is  any  justification  for  an  emergency  clause 
on  this  bill  and  I  do  not  believe  that  the  emergency  clause 
can  be  construed  as  stating  facts  sufficient  to  bring  this  bill 
within  the  purview  of  an  emergency  act  under  the  Constitu- 
tion of  this  State. 

There  are  other  provisions  in  this  bill  with  which  I  am 
not  fully  in  accord,  but  in  view  of  the  above  explanation  there 
is  no  point  in  discussing  them  at  this  time. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  have  vetoed  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  29,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  S#natef  pp. 


May  29,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  9, 
entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  3226  to  3232,  both  inclusive. 
Chapter  15,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating 


228  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

to  interest,  and  to  enact  twelve  new  sections  in  lieu  there- 
of, relating  to  interest  and  other  charges  which  may  be 
charged,  contracted  for  and  received;  providing  for  inter- 
est rates  and  other  charges  applicable  generally  and  to 
all  parties  and  to  all  lenders  and  creditors  without  regard 
to  the  type  or  classifi cation  of  their  business;  providing 
methods  of  charging  and  collecting  interest  and  requir- 
ing refund  of  unearned  interest  collected  on  certain  loans ; 
requiring  a  statement  of  the  loan  and  its  terms  and  con- 
ditions to  be  given  in  connection  with  the  making  of  cer- 
tain loans;  regulating  the  advertising  of  loans;  requiring 
return  of  papers  upon  repayment  of  certain  loans;  regu- 
lating forfeiture  of  title  to  tangibles  pledged  as  security; 
declaring  and  providing  that  payment  of  four  hundred 
dollars  or  less  in  money,  credit,  goods  or  things  in  action 
as  consideration  for  any  sale,  assignment  or  order  for  the 
payment  of  wages,  salaries,  commissions  or  compensa- 
tion for  services  earned  or  to  be  earned,  to  be  a  loan  for 
the  purposes  of  this  act  or  any  other  act  regulating  loans 
or  punishing  usury;  declaring  that  this  act  shall  not  affect 
contracts  entered  into  prior  to  the  effective  date  of  this 
act;  and  providing  penalties  for  the  violation  of  any  of 
the  provisions  of  this  act,  to  be  known  as  Sections  2,  3, 
4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  10,  11,  12  and  13,  declaring  the  separability 
of  the  sections  and  provisions  hereof,  with  an  emergency 
clause." 

In  discussing  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  9  it  will  be  referred  to  as  Senate  Bill  No,  9. 

Senate  Bill  No.  9  repeals  Sections  3226  to  3232  inclusive. 
Chapter  15,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  1939,  relating  to 
interest  and  enacts  fifteen  sections  in  lieu  thereof  relating  to 
interest  and  other  matters. 

Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No,  9  replaces  Section  3227,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  is  the  old  interest 
statute  allowing  interest  at  not  exceeding  eight  per  cent  per 
annum  by  contract  in  this  State  and  which  has  been  the  law 
of  this  State  since  1891. 

Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No*  9  provides  that  parties  may 
agree  in  writing  for  the  payment  of  interest  on  money  due 
or  to  become  due  on  any  contract  as  follows:  (a)  on  written 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  229 

contracts  which  are  payable  in  substantially  equal  installments 
at  substantially  equal  periodic  intervals  over  a  period  not  in 
•excess  of  thirty-six  months,  interest  may  be  charged,  con- 
tracted for,  and  received  at  any  rate  not  to  exceed  the  equiva- 
lent of  ten  per  cent  per  annum  on  that  part  of  the  entire 
principal  amount  borrowed  not  exceeding  $300.00,  and  six  per 
centum  per  annum  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount 
borrowed  exceeding  $300.00  but  not  exceeding  $1500.00,  and 
four  per  centum  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount 
borrowed  exceeding  $1500.00,  computed  on  the  original  prin- 
cipal amount  of  the  contract  for  the  entire  period  for  which 
the  loan  is  made,  plus  additional  charges  and  fees;  (b)  on  all 
written  contracts  that  are  not  made  under  paragraph  (a)  of 
this  section,  a  rate  of  not  in  excess  of  eight  per  centum  per 
annum  may  be  charged. 

Section  5  (c)  provides  what  the  loan  contract  shall  con- 
tain, and  further  provides  that  when  the  payment  of  a  loan 
contract  is  secured  by  a  pledge  of  tangible  personal  property, 
actual  possession  of  which  is  delivered  to  and  retained  with- 
out interruption  by  the  pledgee  under  the  written  agreement 
of  the  parties  that  if  the  loan  is  not  paid  pursuant  to  the  terms 
of  the  loan  contract  or  of  any  extension  thereof,  the  unquali- 
fied title  to  the  tangible  personal  property  shall  be  taken  and 
accepted  by  the  pledgee  in  full  payment  of  the  loan  without 
the  necessity  of  any  foreclosure  of  the  pledge. 

The  validity  of  Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  necessarily 
involves  a  construction  of  Section  44  of  Article  III  of  the  1945 
Constitution  of  Missouri.  Said  section  reads  as  follows; 

"No  law  shall  be  valid  fixing  rates  of  interest  or  return 
for  the  loan  or  use  of  money,  or  the  service  or  other 
charges  made  or  imposed  in  connection  therewith,  for  any 
particular  group  or  class  engaged  in  lending  money.  The 
rates  of  interest  fixed  by  law  shall  be  applicable  generally 
and  to  all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type  or  classi- 
fication of  their  business." 

A  reading  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  discloses  that  the  General 
Assembly  has  allowed  a  special  rate  of  interest  to  be  charged 
by  lenders  making  loans  of  $300.00  or  less,  which  loans  are 
paid  back  in  periodic  equal  installments  and  have  extended 
this  special  interest  rate  to  those  who  take  a  pledge  of  prop- 


230  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

erty,  title  to  which  is  vested  upon  the  nonpayment  of  the  loan. 
This  in  effect  applies  to  the  type  of  loans  and  business  carried 
on  by  small  loan  companies  and  pawnbrokers. 

The  business  of  making  small  loans  in  the  amount  of 
$300.00  or  less  to  be  paid  back  in  equal  installments  has  been 
recognized  as  a  business  and  one  separate  and  distinct  from 
other  types  of  loan  business  such  as  banks,  trust  companies, 
loan  and  investment  companies,  credit  unions,  and  pawn- 
brokers. Article  7,  Chapter  39  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  which  is  known  as  the  Small  Loan  Law  of 
Missouri,  recognized  persons  making  such  loans  as  being  en- 
gaged in  the  small  loan  business.  The  uniform  Small  Loan 
Law  has  described  persons  and  corporations  making  loans  of 
the  size  and  type  in  question  as  being  engaged  in  a  small  loan 
business.  (Gallert,  Small  Loan  Legislation,  page  89.) 

In  40  American  Jurisprudence,  page  700,  it  is  said: 

"The  business  of  small  money  lenders  is  as  distinct  in 
many  respects  from  other  classes  of  business  as  is  that 
of  a  pawnbroker." 

Therefore,  it  appears  that  the  Legislature  is  attempting  to  do 
indirectly  what  it  cannot  do  directly. 

Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution  specifically 
forbids  the  classification  of  lenders  and  the  General  Assembly 
has  sought  by  classifying  loans  rather  than  lenders  to  avoid 
the  prohibition  of  the  Constitution. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  when  the  Constitutional 
Convention  was  considering  Section  44,  Article  III,  two 
amendments  were  introduced  which  attempted  to  limit  the 
scope  of  this  provision. 

Mr.  Wesley  introduced  an  amendment  which  reads  as 
follows: 

"  'Amendment  No.  1  to  Convention  Amendment  No,  6. 
Amend  Convention  amendment  No.  6  by  adding  at  the 
end  of  said  amendment  the  following  words:  **the  maxi- 
mum rate  of  interest  which  may  be  charged  for  the  loan 
of  money  in  amounts  of  $300.00  or  less,  whether  repay- 
able in  stated  installments  or  in  one  lump  sum,  shall  be 
one  percent  per  month  on  the  unpaid  balance  and  such 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  231 

interest  shall  be  in  full  compensation  for  the  loan  and  no 
additional  charges  shall  be  made"  '  "  (Tr.  922). 

This  amendment  was  defeated. 

Mr.  Storckman  introduced  an  amendment  as  follows: 

**  'Amendment  No.  1  to  Amendment  No.  1.  To  Conven- 
tion Amendment  No.  6.  Offered  by  Mr.  Storckman.  By 
inserting  after  the  word  "money"  at  the  end  of  the  first 
sentence  the  following:  "Provided,  however,  the  General 
Assembly  may  classify  loans  as  to  the  amounts  and  may 
fix  different  rates  of  interest  for  each  such  class"  so  that 
Amendment  No.  1  as  amended  will  read  "the  maximum 
rate  of  interest  which  may  be  charged  for  the  loan"  '  ". 
(Tr.  931) 

This  amendment  was  defeated. 

Senator  Cope,  in  discussing  this  provision  of  the  Con- 
stitution, Section  44,  Article  III,  when  it  came  up  for  final 
approval,  said:  (Tr.  5637) 

"„  .  ,  If  it  means  anything  in  the  world  it  means  that 
any  interest  rate  the  Legislature  can  fix  must  apply  to 
everybody,  every  group,  every  corporation,  every  partner- 
ship, every  person  in  the  state.  That  is  what  it  means 
and  nothing  else.  But  they  can't  do  it  under  the  word- 
ing of  this  section.  Mr.  Storckman  says  it  is  all  right 
to  classify  lenders.  Yes,  but  under  this  section  the  bor- 
rowers are  classified  too.  Mr.  Storckman  sent  up  au 
amendment  over  in  the  Supreme  Court  Building  trying 
to  make  it  plain  that  the  Legislature  would  have  the  right 
to  classify  loans  and  fix  different  rates  for  each  class  and 
the  Convention  voted  it  down.  That,  in  itself,  would  be 
enough  for  the  Supreme  Court  to  know  that  the  Legis- 
lature would  have  no  right  to  classify  any  loans  to  pro- 
vide a  higher  rate  for  a  small  amount  for  these  people 
who  have  to  patronize  small  loan  companies  and  there 
are  lots  of  them.  .  *  ." 

Mr.  Cope  continuing  said: 

"Here  is  a  letter  from  Jim  Finch,  one  of  the  prominent 
lawyers  of  Cape  Girardeau.  Here  is  what  he  says.  4l 


232  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

think  that  if  the  proposed  constitutional  provision  is. 
adopted  that  the  Legislature  would  be  prohibited  from 
providing  for  different  rates  of  interest  for  different  types 
of  loans.  .  .  .' 

"Here  is  another  one — legal  opinion  given  by  William  R. 
Gentry  of  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  one  of  the  prominent 
attorneys  of  this  state.  Here  is  what  he  said.  'There- 
fore, it  is  my  opinion  that  any  act  of  the  Legislature 
authorizing  the  making  of  loans  on  the  basis  of  the  amount 
of  money  borrowed  and  providing  for  different  rates  of 
interest  according  to  amounts  based  upon  the  type  of 
security  for  the  loan  and  providing  for  different  rates 
according  to  the  different  classes  of  security  would  be  in 
conflict  with  the  section  and  would,  therefore,  be  void.' 


A  reading  of  the  Wesley  and  Storckman  amendments  dis- 
closes that  the  Constitutional  Convention  realized  that  types 
of  loans  and  the  size  of  loans  could  not  be  classified  under 
the  above  provision,  Section  44,  and  that  a  proviso  or  amend- 
ment was  necessary  to  allow  special  interest  rates  to  persons 
lending  money  in  the  amount  of  $300.00  or  less. 

The  Constitutional  Convention  by  refusing  to  adopt  such 
amendments  went  on  record  as  stating  that  there  could  be  no 
classifications  of  types  or  sizes  of  loans  and  that  all  lenders 
should  have  the  same  interest  rate. 

Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  does  create  classes  of  lend- 
ers, to-wit,  those  engaged  in  lending  a  particular  amount  of 
money  in  a  certain  specified  way  and  does  fix  rates  of  interest 
for  such  particular  groups  or  classes  who  are  engaged  in  lend- 
ing money  in  the  amounts  and  in  the  manner  prescribed  by 
Senate  Bill  No.  9. 

Before  the  adoption  of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945 
Constitution  there  had  grown  up  in  this  and  other  states  a 
number  of  well  defined  types  and  classifications  of  lenders  and 
special  laws  had  been  adopted  fixing  interest  rates  for  the 
various  classes  of  lenders,  namely,  small  loan  laws,  loan  and 
investment  laws,  pawnbrokers'  laws,  credit  union  laws  and 
others. 

Senate  Bill  No.  9  recognizes  various  types  and  classifica- 
tions of  lenders  heretofore  existing  and  permits  them  to  con- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  233 

tinue  business  in  practically  the  same  manner  and  under  the 
same  conditions  as  did  the  laws  in  force  at  the  time  of  the 
adoption  of  the  new  Constitution. 

Section  5a,  for  instance,  on  written  contracts  evidencing 
loans  which  are  payable  in  substantially  equal  installments 
at  substantially  equal  periodic  intervals  over  a  period  not  in 
excess  of  thirty-six  months,  permits  lenders  to  charge  interest 
at  a  rate  of  ten  per  centum  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance 
from  the  original  principal  amount  for  the  full  term  of  the 
loan,  on  that  part  of  the  principal  amount  borrowed  not  ex- 
•ceeding  $300.00,  and  allows  such  lenders  to  charge  six  per 
centum  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance  on  that  part  of  the 
entire  principal  amount  borrowed  exceeding  $300.00,  but  not 
exceeding  $1500.00  for  the  full  term  of  the  loan,  and  four  per 
centum  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance  on  that  part  of  the 
entire  principal  amount  borrowed  exceeding  $1500.00,  for  the 
entire  period  for  which  the  loan  is  made.  In  addition,  such 
lenders  are  entitled  to  additional  fees  on  that  part  of  the 
original  principal  amount  not  exceeding  $300.00. 

Under  Article  8  of  Chapter  33,  of  the  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri  1939,  loan  and  investment  companies*  prior  to 
July  1,  1946,  were  permitted  to  charge  borrowers  interest  at 
the  rate  of  eight  per  cent  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance, 
plus  certain  fees.  It  is  common  knowledge  that  most  loans 
made  by  loan  and  investment  companies  were  of  relatively 
small  amounts.  Loan  and  investment  companies  would  be 
permitted,  under  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9,  to  con- 
tinue to  operate  substantially  as  in  the  past,  but  would  be 
permitted  to  charge  interest  at  the  rate  of  ten  per  cent  per 
annum,  deducted  in  advance,  on  that  part  of  the  entire  prin- 
cipal amount  borrowed  not  exceeding  $300.00,  instead  of  eight 
per  cent  per  annum  which  they  formerly  were  permitted  to 
•deduct  in  advance* 

Under  the  provisions  of  said  Section  5a  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  9,  lenders  may  convert  the  amount  of  interest  and  fees 
permitted  to  be  deducted  in  advance  into  a  true  interest  rate, 
and  may  receive  such  true  interest  rate  on  the  unpaid  balances 
of  the  principal  amount  of  the  loan  for  the  time  such  balances 
are  actually  outstanding.  This  provides  a  method  for  lenders 
formerly  engaged  in  the  small  loan  business  to  continue  to 


234  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

charge  interest  in  the  same  manner  as  previously  provided 
under  the  small  loan  law.  The  only  difference  is  that  small 
loan  companies  were  previously  authorized  to  charge  three  per 
cent  per  month  on  any  loan  of  $100.00  or  less,  and  two  and  one- 
half  per  cent  per  month  on  any  loan  of  more  than  $100.00 
and  not  more  than  $300.00,  while  under  the  provisions  of  Sen- 
ate Bill  No.  9  such  small  loan  companies  would  be  permitted 
to  charge  a  reputed  26.88  per  centum  per  annum  interest  rate 
on  the  principal  amount  not  exceeding  $300.00.  Such  small 
loan  companies  could,  of  course,  loan  an  amount  in  excess  of 
$300.00  under  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  and  charge 
an  interest  rate  not  to  exceed  six  per  centum  per  annum,  de- 
ducted in  advan.ce,  on  that  part  of  the  entire  principal  amount 
borrowed  exceeding  $300.00,  but  not  exceeding  $1500.00,  and 
four  per  centum  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance,  on  that  part 
of  the  entire  principal  amount  borrowed  exceeding  $1500.00. 

Pawnbrokers  are  also  recognized  by  the  provisions  of  Sec- 
tion 5c,  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9,  and  are  permitted  to  continue 
business  in  the  same  manner  as  heretofore  except  such  pawn- 
brokers may  now  charge  a  true  rate  of  interest  equal  to  ten 
per  cent  per  annum,  deducted  in  advance  on  the  entire  prin- 
cipal amount  for  the  full  term  of  the  loan,  plus  certain  fees, 
totalling  a  reputed  26.88  per  centum  per  annum  which  is  in 
excess  of  the  two  per  centum  per  month  such  pawnbrokers 
could  formerly  charge. 

In  other  words,  Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No*  9  does  allow 
loan  and  investment  companies,  small  loan  companies,  and 
pawnbrokers  to  enjoy  a  special  rate  of  interest.  Proponents 
of  Senate  Bill  No.  9,  however,  contend  that  said  special  rates 
of  interest  are  not  made  for  any  particular  group  or  class  and 
that  they  are  applicable  generally  and  to  all  lenders  without 
regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of  their  business*  I  think 
not.  If  such  interest  rates  were  applicable  generally  and  to 
all  lenders  then  anyone  loaning  the  amounts  specified  in  the 
bill  could  charge  the  rates  of  interest  authorized  by  said 
Section  5a.  This  is  not  true.  Only  lenders  who  lend  money 
in  the  particular  way  and  manner  specified  in  the  bill  are  per- 
mitted to  charge  the  rates  authorized  by  Section  5a«  It  m 
only  lenders  who  loan  money  evidenced  by  written  contracts 
payable  in  substantially  equal  installments  at  substantially 


GOVEBNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  235 

equal  periodic  intervals  over  a  period  not  in  excess  of  thirty- 
six  months  who  are  permitted  to  charge  the  specified  rates  and 
such  lenders  must  comply  with  all  applicable  provisions  of 
the  act.  As  an  example,  the  lender  must,  at  the  time  of  mak- 
ing the  loan,  deliver  to  the  borrower  a  written  statement  or 
a  copy  of  the  loan  contract  showing  certain,  information,  re- 
quired by  the  act.  The  contract  must  also  contain  an  agree- 
ment permitting  the  borrower  to  repay  the  loan  in  whole  or 
in  part  at  any  time. 

Of  course,  anyone  desiring  to  comply  with  all  of  the  pro- 
Visions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  would  be  permitted  to  charge  the 
interest  authorized  but  if  they  did  lend  money  in  compliance 
with  the  provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  9  that  would  amount 
to  engaging  in  the  business  of  making  loans  of  small  amounts 
at  high  interest  rates  as  heretofore  permitted  and  allowed  only 
to  be  done  by  small  loan  companies,  loan  and  investment  com- 
panies, and  pawnbrokers.  Therefore,  the  rates  of  interest  pro- 
vided by  Section  5a  do  not  apply  generally  to  all  lenders 
without  regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of  their  business. 

Senate  Bill  No.  9  not  only  classifies  loans  of  $300.00  or 
less,  but  also  classifies  loans  not  exceeding  $1500.00  and  loans 
in  excess  of  $1500.00,  and  authorizes  different  rates  of  interest 
for  each  of  such  classes.  All  three  classes  of  loans  must  be 
made  in  a  particular  manner,  to-wit,  evidenced  by  written 
contract,  payable  m  substantially  equal  installments  at  sub- 
stantially equal  periodic  intervals  over  a  period  not  in  excess 
of  thirty-six  months.  The  distinction  between  a  classification 
of  lenders  and  a  classification  of  loans  is  a  nebulous  one.  It  is 
my  opinion  that  the  bill  authorizing  lenders  to  charge  different 
rates  of  interest  for  different  classes  of  loans  creates  a  classi- 
fication of  lenders  and  authorizes  such  classes  to  charge  a  par- 
ticular rate  of  interest  not  permitted  to  be  charged  generally 
and  by  all  lenders, 

In,  support  of  the  above  statement  I  call  attention  to  the 
following  cases: 

In  Commonwealth  v.  Puder,  261  Pa.  129,  104  Ati  505, 
the  Supreme  Court  of  Pennsylvania,  in  speaking  of  an  act 
relating  to  persons  lending  $300.00  or  less  said: 

"On  the  other  hand,  the  act  of  1915  confines  the  cla&s  of 
loans  to  those  not  exceeding  $300  and  defines  the  class  of 


236  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

borrowers  as  'individuals  pressed  by  lack  of  funds  to  meet 
immediate  necessities.'  It  thus  appears  all  persons  are 
eliminated  from  taking  the  benefit  of  the  act,  except  those 
who  desire  to  make  loans  not  exceeding  $300  in  amount 


"It  remains  only  to  consider  whether  or  not  the  basis  of 
classification  adopted  in  the  act  of  1915  is  a  proper  one. 
.  .  .  Applying  the  foregoing  principles  to  the  present 
case,  the  fundamental  question  is  whether  a  necessity  ex- 
ists demanding  legislation  for  the  class  of  money  lenders. 
in  sums  of  $300  or  less  to  those  of  limited  means  who 
would  otherwise  be  unable  to  procure  needed  funds,  and 
whether  classification  adopted  to  meet  such  necessity  is 
based  on  a  real  and  not  merely  an  artificial  distinction. 
.  .  .  ."  (Underscoring  mine) 

In  State  v.  Sherman,  18  Wyo.  169,  105  Pac.  299,  1.  c.  302,, 
the  Supreme  Court  of  Wyoming  said: 

"In  support  of  the  objections  to  the  statute  before  us,  it 
is  argued  that  there  is  no  reasonable  ground  of  difference 
authorizing  this  legislation  between  the  loan  of  a  sum  less 
than  $200,  and  the  loan  of  a  greater  amount 

",  .  .  .  There  would  thus  appear  to  be  a  substantial 
difference  between  that  class  and  others  with  respect  to 
the  rate  of  interest  demanded  and  received.  The  act  fixea 
the  dividing  line  between  the  class  affected  by  it  and  the 
persons  and  transactions  excluded  at  the  sum  of  $200, 


Senate  Bill  No,  9  violates  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the 
1945  Missouri  Constitution  because  in  allowing  a  rate  of  inter- 
est to  persons  making  a  loan  of  $300.00  or  less  which  is  greater 
than  the  rate  of  interest  allowed  those  who  make  loans  of 
$300.00  a  classification  of  lenders  is  created.  Senate  Bill  No, 
9  classifies  lenders  into  three  groups  insofar  as  rates  of  interest 
are  concerned  and  makes  $300.00  and  $1500.00  the  dividing 
line  between  the  classes.  Section  44,  Article  III  forbids  **rate& 
of  interest"  either  higher  or  lower  for  any  particular  group* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  237 

I  believe  that  Senate  Bill  No.  9  violates  the  spirit  of  Sec- 
tion 44  of  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution  and  violates 
the  intent  of  the  framers  of  the  Constitution.  The  purpose 
of  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  was  not  only  to 
wipe  out  classifications  of  lenders  and  put  everybody  lending 
money  on  a  common  basis,  but  it  was  also  intended  to  lower 
interest  rates  generally  instead  of  raising  them  for  all  lenders 
to  the  rates  previously  allowed  a  few  specialized  lenders.  This 
is  shown  by  a  reading  of  the  Constitutional  Convention  debates 
commencing  at  page  909. 

"Mr.  Wesley:  Well,  I  don't  see  where  that  will  repeal 
any  present  statute.  It  will  simply  allow  the  banks  to 
come  up  to  the  thirty-six  percent  and  maybe,  eventually 
competition  will  force  it  down,  maybe,  eventually — may- 
be, isn't  that  right,  Senator? 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  No,  no,  Mr.  Wesley,  this  thirty-six 
percent  and  thirty  percent  is  applicable  to  a  particular 
class  or  group  of  loans. 

"Mr.  Welsey:    Of  Loans? 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  Yes,  the  law  in  our  statute  books 
allowing  that  charge  is  a  class — piece  of  class  legislation 
and  is  limited  to  a  particular  group.  Your  banks  can't 
charge  you  now,  nobody  can  except  the  members  of  that 
group. 

"Mr.  Wesley:  Your  amendment  will  allow  them  to  come 
into  that  group? 

"Mr.  McReynolds:    No,  no,  sir, 
"Mr.  Wesley:    I  don't  understand. 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  My  amendment  will  destroy  every 
single  classification  of  any  kind  and  will  put  everybody 
loaning  money  on  a  common  plan.  Our  whole  trouble  to- 
day is  that  we  set  xip  these  special  classifications  and  give 
them  special  benefits  because  of  alleged  conditions  that 
prevail  in  the  class.  Now,  my  theory  is  that  if  you  wipe 
out  classifications  so  that  they  are  on  a  common  level, 
then  you  find  yourself  back  to  your  fixed  interest  rates 
that  have  been  in  our  statutes  for  sixty  or  seventy  years 


238  MESSAGES  AMD  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

and  these,  all  of  these  group  rates  built  around  a  special 
classification  must  disappear  under  the  Constitutional 
amendment.  Now,  I  have  no  objection  if  you  feel  that 
it  isn't  broad  enough  for  the  amendment  to  say  that  this 
shall  have  the  effect  of  appealing  [repealing]  any  class 
rates  in  existence. 

"Mr.  Wesley:  That  is  what  I  am  afraid  of.  That  rate 
of  thirty-six  percent  will  stay  and  allow  any  Building  and 
Loan  Association  and  the  banks  and  all  of  them  to  get 
up  to  that  high  rate,  depending  on  competition  to  bring 
the  rate  down,  and  I  think  there  will  be  no  competition 
because  I  think  they  will  get  together  sooner  or  later. 

"Mr.  McReynolds:  It  can't  stay  as  it  is  now,  Mr.  Wes- 
ley, because  those  are  class  rates  and  if  you  wipe  out  your 
class  rates  you  have  the  common  level  which  is  applicable 
to  everybody. 

"Mr.  Wesley:  The  way  that  reads  to  me,  I  understand 
that  it  simply  wipes  out  the  classes  of  lenders  who  can 
charge  that  money  and  put  them  all  in  the  same  class, 

"Mr.  McReynolds:    That  is  right." 


"Mr.  Damron:  .  .  .  Now,  what  I  am  particularly  in- 
terested in  is  this,  and  I  want  somebody  to  answer  the 
question.  If  Senator  McReynolds'  proposal  is  adopted 
and  experience  proves  that  these  small  loans  can't  be 
made  at  their  legal  rate  of  interest,  which  would  be  eight 
percent  as  I  understand  it,  then  would  the  Legislature 
have  the  power  to  pass  a  law  permitting  a  higher  rate  of 
interest  on  small  loans?  That's  what  Pd  like  for  some- 
body to  answer  and  convince  me  that  they  are  right 
about  it. 

"Mr,  Finnegan:  May  I?  Will  you  state  your  question 
again? 

"Mr.  Damron:  If  Senator  McReynolds'  proposition  is 
adopted  and  experience  would  prove  that  these  small  loans 
can't  be  made  at  the  legal  rate  of  interest,  which  I  under- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  239 

stand  would  be  eight  percent,  then  would  the  Legisla- 
ture have  the  power  to  make  a  higher  rate  of  interest  for 
small  loans  and  a  different  rate  of  interest  for  higher 
loans? 

"Mr.  Finnegan:  No,  they  wouldn't  be  able  to  make  any 
different  rate  for  any  class. 

"Mr.  Damron:  I  don't  want  to  vote  something  whereby 
the  banks  could  charge  fifteen  percent  on  a  $10,000.00 
loan  or  any  sizable  loan. 


"Mr.  Park:  ...  I  am  sure  that  the  members  of  the 
Legislature  will  see  to  it  that  not  more  than  eight  per- 
cent will  be  charged (Tr.  993) 

"Mr.  Parker:  ...  I  haven't  the  slightest  doubt,  not 
the  slightest,  and  I'd  say  that  to  the  best  friend  I've  got 
on  earth,  but  what  the  Legislature  will  come  here  and 
adopt  a  rate  of  interest  not  higher  than  eight  percent  if 
the  matter  ever  comes  up  before  it.  .  .  ."  (Tr.  993) 

Senate  Bill  No.  9  would  enable  pawnbrokers,  small  loan 
companies,  and  loan  and  investment  companies,  to  continue  to 
operate  substantially  in  the  same  old  way.  Small  loan  com- 
panies might  not  be  able  to  charge  quite  as  much  interest  as 
they  formerly  did  under  the  small  loan  law,  but  other  spe- 
cialized lenders  will  be  able  to  charge  much  more,  and  banks, 
credit  associations,  building  and  loan  associations,  private 
individuals,  and  others,  will  be  permitted  to  charge  a  far 
higher  rate  of  interest  than  was  ever  dreamed  of  before  the 
adoption  of  the  Constitution  of  1945* 

Under  the  old  small  loan  law,  only  small  loan  companies, 
under  rigid  regulations  and  supervision,  could  charge  interest 
on  loans  of  $300.00  or  less  at  a  rate  even  approximating  the 
rate  permitted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  9  to  all  lenders  who  comply 
with  its  provisions.  The  theory  in  permitting  small  loan 
companies  to  charge  high  rates  of  interest  was  based  on  the 
proposition  that  certain  necessitous  borrowers  could  not  ob- 
tain loans  from  any  other  class  of  lenders  and  that  the  hazards 
incident  to  such  loans  justified  such  high  rates.  It  was  never 


240  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

dreamed  that  banks,  which,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  were  spe- 
fically  excluded  from  coming  under  the  provisions  of  the  small 
loan  law,  would  ever  be  permitted  to  charge  the  public  gen- 
erally small  loan  interest  rates. 

If  Senate  Bill  No.  9  were  to  become  a  law  not  only  would 
that  class  of  borrowers  whose  loans  are  considered  hazardous 
be  required  to  pay  what  I  consider  exorbitant  rates,  but  the 
borrowing  public  generally  would  likewise  be  subjected  to 
such  rates. 

Under  laws  invalidated  by  the  Constitution,  pawnbrokers 
could  charge  two  per  cent  per  month,  credit  unions  one  per 
cent  per  month,  loan  and  investment  companies  eight  per  cent 
per  annum,  discounted,  plus  $1.00  investigation  fee  on  every 
$50.00  loaned,  and  a  fee  of  not  greater  than  $20.00  on  a  loan 
secured  by  chattel  mortgage  or  a  lien  upon  a  motor  vehicle. 
Banks,  of  course,  can  charge  only  eight  per  cent  simple  inter- 
est, as  can  building  and  loan  associations,  insurance  com- 
panies, private  lenders,  and  others,  under  existing  laws. 

Under  Senate  Bill  No.  9  pawnbrokers,  loan  and  invest- 
ment companies,  and  credit  unions  would  be  permitted  to 
charge  a  higher  rate  of  interest  than  formerly.  Banks  and 
others,  of  course,  would  be  permitted  to  charge  far  more  than 
under  the  present  law. 

Under  the  old  Small  Loan  Law  small  loan  companies 
could  charge  thirty-six  per  centum  per  annum  on  loans  of 
$100.00  or  less,  and  thirty  per  cent  per  annum  on  loans  of 
more  than  $100.00  and  not  in  excess  of  $300.00, 

Under  Senate  Bill  No,  9,  according  to  a  reputable  actuary, 
the  lender  could  charge  on  a  loan  not  to  exceed  $100,00,  27.59 
per  cent  per  annum,  on  a  loan  of  $300.00,  27,01  per  cent  per 
annum,  and  on  a  loan  of  $1,000,00,  15.88  per  cent  per  annum* 
In  addition,  said  Senate  Bill  No*  9  would  permit  interest  to 
be  charged  on  interest,  which  was  not  permitted  under  the 
old  small  loan  act.  Furthermore,  the  lender  may  charge, 
under  Senate  Bill  No*  9  fees  allowed  by  law  actually  and  nec- 
essarily paid  out  by  the  lender  to  any  public  officer  for  filing, 
recording  or  releasing  in  any  public  office  any  instruments 
securing  a  loan.  This  charge  could  not  be  made  under  the 
old  small  loan  law.  In  addition  thereto,  the  lender  may 
charge  the  costs  incurred  in  obtaining  a  search  of  the  public 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  241 

records  and  the  issuance  of  a  certificate  pertaining  thereto. 
Such  a  fee  as  this  could  not  be  charged  under  the  old  small 
loan  law. 

Under  Senate  Bill  No.  9  persons  engaged  in  selling  mer- 
chandise on  the  installment  plan  could  loan  the  purchase 
price  to  the  buyer  and  charge  him  the  high  rate  of  interest 
permitted  by  the  bill.  The  act  provides  that  the  loan  contract 
shall  contain  an  agreement  permitting  the  borrower  to  pre- 
pay the  loan  in  whole  or  in  part  at  any  time,  and  further  pro- 
vides that  on  prepayment  in  full  the  borrower  will  receive  a 
refund  of  the  unearned  portion  of  the  total  amount  of  interest 
which  has  been  deducted  as  provided  in  paragraph  a,  of  Sec- 
tion 5  of  the  bill,  but  it  specifically  provides  that  no  refund 
shall  be  required  for  any  partial  prepayment  of  any  loan. 
In  other  words,  the  lender  may  charge  and  deduct  the  inter- 
est in  advance  and  keep  the  entire  amount  deducted  for  the 
entire  period  of  the  loan,  although  nine-tenths  of  the  loan 
may  have  been  prepaid  long  before  due.  This  could  not  have 
been  done  under  the  old  small  loan  law.  Said  bill  provides 
that  delinquent  installments  may  bear  interest  at  an  agreed 
rate  not  exceeding  ten  per  cent  per  annum  from  the  date  of 
maturity  originally  scheduled  in  the  loan  contract  which  is 
in  addition  to  the  twenty-seven  per  cent  per  annum  already 
paid. 

In  conclusion  I  think  there  is  no  question  but  what  Sec- 
tion 44  of  Article  III  requires  that  the  rates  of  interest  fixed 
by  law  shall  be  applicable  generally  and  to  all  lenders  without 
regard  to  the  type  or  classification  of  their  business.  That 
is  what  the  section  says  and  according  to  the  debates  in  the 
Constitutional  Convention  that  is  what  the  framers  of  the 
Constitution  intended.  The  rates  of  interest  fixed  by  Senate 
Bill  No.  9  do  not  apply  generally  and  to  all  lenders  but  only 
to  the  particular  class  of  lenders  mentioned  herein  and  such 
special  rates  of  interest  are  based  on  the  type  and  classification 
of  the  lenders'  business.  This  violates  the  spirit  and  intent 
of  Section  44  of  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution.  I  think 
the  framers  of  the  Constitution  also  intended  that  the  rates 
of  interest  which  lenders  charged  the  borrowing  public  were 
to  be  reasonable  rates  and  not  the  exorbitant  rates  which  small 
loan  companies  were  formerly  permitted  to  charge.  For  in- 


242  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

stance,  Mr.  Park  said,  "I  am  sure  that  the  members  of  the 
Legislature  will  see  to  it  that  not  more  than  eight  percent 
will  be  charged."  Mr.  Parker  said,  "...  I  haven't  the 
slightest  doubt,  not  the  slightest,  and  I'd  say  that  to  the  best 
friend  I've  got  on  earth,  but  what  the  Legislature  will  come 
here  and  adopt  a  rate  of  interest  not  higher  than  eight  percent 

if  the  matter  ever,  comes  up  before  it "    Mr.  Damron 

said,  "I  don't  want  to  vote  something  whereby  the  banks 
could  charge  fifteen  percent  on  a  $10,000.00  loan  or  any 
sizable  loan."  Mr.  Julian  said,  "You  think  that  this  amend- 
ment here  would  have  the  effect  of  lowering  the  interest  rates 
in  Missouri?" 

Mr.  McReynolds:    "It  is  inevitable." 

Mr.  Julian:  "It  would  force  the  General  Assembly  to 
lower  the  interest  rate  from  the  thirty  and  thirty-six  percent 
down?" 

Mr.  McReynolds:  "Why,  it  would  destroy  that  classifi- 
cation. It  would  put  them  all  on  a  common  ground " 

(Tr.  905). 

I  stated  in  my  veto  message  on  Senate  Substitute  for 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  838  in  the 
Sixty-third  General  Assembly  that  the  rates  of  interest  pro- 
vided in  that  bill  were  excessive  and  not  justified.  The  rates 
of  interest  and  charges  provided  in  Senate  Bill  No.  9  are  as 
high  or  higher  than  the  rates  in  House  Bill  No,  838. 

The  debates  in  the  Constitutional  Convention  show  that 
the  purpose  of  Section  44  of  Article  III  was  not  only  to  wipe 
out  classifications  of  lenders  and  put  everybody  loaning  money 
on  a  common  basis,  but  it  also  was  intended  to  lower  interest 
rates  generally  instead  of  raising  them  for  all  lenders  to  the 
rates  previously  allowed  a  few  specialized  lenders*  The  bor- 
rowing public  is  entitled  to  consideration.  I  do  not  intend 
to  approve  any  legislation  that  subjects  the  public  generally 
to  the  exorbitant  rates  of  interest  provided  for  in  this  bilL 
Neither  do  I  intend  to  approve  legislation  that  does  not  apply 
to  all  lenders  generally  without  regard  to  the  type  or  classifi- 
cation of  their  business,  Section  44  of  Article  III  of  the  Con* 
stitution  may  be  an  unwise  provision*  If  it  is  there  is  a  way 
to  correct  it,  but  so  long  as  it  remains  in  the  Constitution  I 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  243 

intend  to  carry  out  the  intention  of  the  framers  of  the  Con- 
stitution and  those  who  adopted  it. 

For  the  reasons  herein  stated  I  do  not  approve  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  9. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 
JUNE  5,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1329-1831 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  157,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  11945  and  11949  of  Article  19, 
Chapter  76,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating 
to  registration  and  elections  in  all  cities  of  this  state 
which  now  contain  or  may  hereafter  contain  10,000  in- 
habitants and  less  than  30,000  inhabitants,  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  two  new  sections  relating  to  the  same  sub- 
ject matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  11945  and  11949.° 

This  bill  applies  to  cities  having  a  population  of  ten  thou- 
sand and  less  than  thirty  thousand  inhabitants. 

Section  11945  of  House  Bill  No,  157  has  a  new  provision 
found  in  lines  9  to  13,  inclusive,  page  2,  wherein  it  is  "provided 
that  when  any  person  has  changed  his  domicile  to  a  precinct 
or  ward  other  than  the  one  in  which  he  is  legally  registered, 
such  person  shall  not  be  qualified  to  vote  in  the  precinct  or 
ward  from  which  he  has  moved  his  domicile," 


244  MESSAGES  AND  PBOCLAMATIONS  OF 

The  above  provision  in  House  Bill  No.  157  will  have  the 
effect  of  disfranchising  all  registered  voters  who  change  their 
domicile  during  the  time  that  the  registration  books  are  closed. 
The  registration  books  are  closed  for  ten  days  preceding  an 
election  and  there  is  no  provision  in  the  law  applicable  to 
cities  having  a  population  of  ten  thousand  and  less  than  thirty 
thousand  inhabitants  for  registering  a  voter  during  said  ten- 
day  period. 

Other  cities  have  attempted  to  take  care  of  a  situation 
where  a  voter  moves  from  a  precinct  or  ward  during  the  time 
that  the  registration  books  are  closed  or  intends  to  move  from 
his  precinct  or  ward  during  said  period. 

In  cities  of  the  first  class  (Section  11987,  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1941,  pages  358  and  359),  it  is  provided  that  "any  duly 
registered  voter  who  has  complied  with  the  provisions  of  this 
act  who  shall  change  his  address  within  the  city  during  the 
closed  period  for  registration  may  for  the  purpose  of  the  elec- 
tion immediately  following  such  closed  period  vote  in  the  pre- 
cinct in  which  he  is  properly  registered,  even  though  he  may 
have  moved  from  that  address  during  the  closed  period  if  in 
all  other  respects  he  is  a  properly  qualified  voter  of  such  city/' 
(Underscoring  mine) 

In  cities  of  from  three  hundred  thousand  to  seven  hun- 
dred thousand  inhabitants  it  is  provided  (Section  12124,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939)  ".  .  .  Any  registered 
voter  who  changes  his  residence  after  the  close  of  registration 
may  thereafter  up  until  the  close  of  office  hours  of  Friday 
preceding  the  day  of  election  apply  in  person  at  the  main 
office  of  the  board  and  have  his  registration  transferred  by 
taking  oath  and  signing  an  affidavit  of  his  removal  since  the 
date  of  the  close  of  registration,  stating  the  exact  date  upon 
which  he  changes  his  residence/* 

In  cities  of  one  hundred  fifty  thousand  inhabitants  or 
over  it  is  provided  (Section  11865,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis* 
souri,  1939)  ".  .  .  If  any  voter  who  has  registered  in  one 
precinct  shall  remove  to  another  at  any  time  before  Wednes- 
day next  preceding  the  election  at  which  he  or  she  desires  to 
vote  or  if  such  voter  shall  appear  before  the  board of  .election 
commissioners  or  the  clerk  thereof  at  any  time  before  said 
Wednesday  and  declare  his  or  her  intention  to  move  and  be 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  245 

domiciled  in  another  precinct  on  election  day  and  shall  re- 
quest a  change  of  registration  and  a  certificate  thereof,  it  shall 
be  the  duty  of  the  board  of  election  commissioners  to  allow 
such  change  of  registration  .  .  .  ."  (Underscoring  mine.) 

In  other  words,  if  a  citizen  is  a  qualified,  registered  voter 
in  a  city  or  county  he  should  be  entitled  to  vote  at  an  elec- 
tion and  merely  because  he  has  moved  from  one  precinct  or 
ward  to  another  in  the  city  during  the  time  that  the  regis- 
tration books  are  closed  should  not  disfranchise  him.  The 
practical  effect  of  the  proviso  in  Section  11945  of  House  Bill 
No.  157  is  that  if  a  person  moves  from  one  precinct  or  ward 
to  another  in  the  city  and  has  not  transferred  his  registration 
as  provided  for  in  Section  11951,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  (before  the  10th  day  preceding  the  election)  he 
is  prohibited  from  voting  because,  under  the  proviso  in  Sec- 
tion 11945  of  House  Bill  No.  157  he  cannot  vote  from  the 
precinct  or  ward  from  which  he  has  moved  his  domicile. 

Provision  is  made  as  above  stated  in  other  cities  and 
counties  where  registration  is  provided  to  permit  the  voter 
to  transfer  his  registration  after  the  books  have  been  closed  or 
if  he  intends  to  move  during  said  closed  period  he  is  given 
an  opportunity  to  have  his  registration  transferred. 

Under  the  present  Section  11949,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  it  is  provided  "Registration  for  any  election  shall 
be  closed  at  five  o'clock  P.  M.  on  the  Wednesday  of  the  sec- 
ond week  preceding  the  election,  and  no  voter  shall  be  there- 
after registered  prior  so  [to]  said  election,  except  by  order  of 
a  judge  of  the  circuit  court."  (Underscoring  mine) 

It  will  be  noted  that  Section  11949  of  House  Bill  No,  157 
provides  "Registration  for  any  election  shall  be  closed  at  five 
o'clock  P.  M.  on  the  tenth  day  preceding  the  election,  and 
no  voter  shall  be  thereafter  registered  prior  to  said  election/' 
The  provision  which  now  appears  in  Section  11949,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  "except  by  order  of  a  judge  of  the 
circuit  court"  is  omitted  from  Section  11949  of  House  Bill 
No.  157, 

In  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bills  Nos.  33  to  39,  inclusive,  repealed 
and  reenacted  Section  11949,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 


246  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

1939.  I  vetoed  this  bill  for  certain  reasons  which  are  a  matter 
of  record.  However,  Section  11949  of  said  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  contained  the  provision  "except  by  order  of  a  judge 
of  the  circuit  court."  Said  Section  11949  of  said  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  also  contained  a  provision  that  a  person  who 
has  been  unable  to  register  may  appear  before  two  judges  of 
election  in  the  precinct  where  the  voter  registers  and  said 
judges  shall  have  the  authority  to  register  such  voter.  I  stated 
in  said  veto  message  of  said  Senate  Committee  Substitute 
that  from  a  practical  standpoint  but  few  voters  could  be  regis- 
tered on  the  day  of  election  because  the  judges  were  too  busy 
with  their  duties  on  the  day  of  election.  However,  this  pro- 
vision in  Section  11949  does  give  the  voter  who  is  not  regis- 
tered an  opportunity  to  register,  and  he  should  be  given  this 
opportunity,  and  it  should  remain  in  the  statutes.  House  Bill 
No.  157  omits  this  provision  in  its  entirety. 

House  Bill  No.  157  provides  that  registration  for  any 
election  shall  be  closed  at  five  o'clock  P.  M.  on  the  tenth  day 
preceding  the  election  and  no  voter  shall  be  thereafter  regis- 
tered prior  to  said  election.  Said  House  Bill  No.  157  also 
provides  that  when  any  legally  registered  voter  moves  from 
a  precinct  or  ward  to  another  precinct  or  ward  in  the  city 
other  than  the  one  in  which  he  is  legally  registered  that  such 
legally  registered  voter  shall  not  be  qualified  to  vote  in  the 
precinct  or  ward  from  which  he  has  moved  his  domicile;  said 
bill  does  not  provide  any  method  by  which  a  registered  voter 
may  transfer  his  registration  during  said  closed  period  nor  is 
any  method  provided  before  said  closed  period  whereby  he 
may  be  given  an  opportunity  to  appear  before  the  board  of 
registrars  and  request  a  transfer  before  the  election.  It  is  my 
opinion  that  these  provisions  in  this  bill  are  unfair  to  the  quali- 
fied voters  of  the  cities  within  this  class. 

For  these  reasons  I  do  not  approve  this  bill 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  247 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  6,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1S23-1825 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  197, 

entitled : 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  employment  and  compensation 
of  deputies  and  assistants  by  the  county  collector  of  reve- 
nue in  counties  of  the  4th  class,  and  for  an  additional  duty 
of  the  county  collector  of  revenue  to  distribute  state 
income  tax  blanks." 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  197  pro- 
vides for  the  employment  and  compensation  of  deputies  and 
assistants  for  the  county  collector  of  revenue  in  counties  of 
the  fourth  class,  together  with  an  additional  duty  of  the  county 
collector  of  revenue  to  distribute  State  income  tax  blanks. 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  197  will 
be  referred  to  as  House  Bill  No,  197  in  this  message. 

Said  House  Bill  No.  197  makes  no  provision  for  computing 
or  allowing  the  salaries  provided  for  the  deputies  and  assistants 
upon  any  definite  period  of  time  basis.  In  other  words,  in 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  198,  a  com- 
panion bill,  in  Section  1,  line  4,  it  states  that  the  compensa- 
tion therein  provided  may  be  allowed  "annually."  The  word 
"annually"  does  not  appear  in  House  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  197.  There  is  no  way  to  determine  upon 
what  time  basis  the  compensation  should  be  allowed. 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  vs.  Thompson,  5  S,  W,  (2d) 
57,  1.  c.  59,  the  Supreme  Court  of  Missouri  quoted  approv- 
ingly from  Johnson  v.  Barham,  99  Va.  305,  38  S.  E,  136,  as 
follows: 


248  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"  *It  is  safer  in  a  case  which  admits  of  doubt,  where  the 
court  finds  itself  at  all  involved  in  conjecture  as  to  what 
was  the  legislative  intent,  that  the  particular  object  which 
may  reasonably  be  supposed  to  have  influenced  the  Legis- 
lature in  the  particular  case  should  fail  of  consummation 
than  that  courts  should  too  readily  yield  to  a  supposed 
necessity,  and  exercise  a  power  so  delicate,  and  so  easily 
abused,  as  that  of  adding  to  or  taking  from  the  words  of 
the  statute.'  "  (Underscoring  mine) 

In  other  words,  I  seriously  doubt  if  the  Court  would  have 
the  right  to  add  the  word  "annually"  in  line  4  of  Section  1 
of  House  Bill  No.  197,  and  because  of  this  doubt  and  uncer- 
tainity  it  is  my  opinion  this  bill  should  not  be  approved. 

There  are  other  reasons  why  this  bill  should  not  be 
approved.  It  provides  for  the  employment  of  deputies  and 
assistants  by  the  Collector  of  Revenue  in  counties  of  the 
fourth  class  with  the  approval  of  the  county  court  and  pro- 
vides for  compensation  for  said  deputies  and  assistants.  I  have 
been  unable  to  find  any  bill  which  has  been  enacted  since  the 
effective  date  of  the  1945  Missouri  Constitution  providing  for 
the  compensation  or  salary  of  county  collectors  in  counties 
of  the  third  and  fourth  class.  Therefore,  the  compensation 
of  county  collectors  in  the  third  and  fourth  class  is  computed 
by  the  provisions  of  Section  11106,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  and  the  compensation  of  deputies  and  clerical  hire 
of  the  county  collectors  is  governed  by  Section  11107,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  Said  section  is  as  follows: 

"Section  11107.  That  the  officers  referred  to  in  section 
11106,  in  addition  to  the  maximum  amount  of  fees  and 
commissions  permitted  to  be  retained  by  county  collectors 
as  provided  in  section  11106,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri for  1939,  each  such  officer  may  retain  for  the  pay- 
ment of  deputy  and/or  clerical  hire  a  sum  not  to  exceed 
twenty-five  per  cent  of  the  maximum  amount  of  fees  and 
commissions  which  such  officer  is  permitted  to  retain  by 
said  section  as  so  amended,  but  such  deputy  and/or  cleri- 
cal hire  shall  be  payable  out  of  fees  and  commissions 
earned  and  collected  by  such  officer  only  and  not  from 
general  revenue.'* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  249 

Said  Section  11107  is  not  repealed  or  referred  to  in  any 
manner  in  House  Bill  No.  197.  It  is  my  opinion,  if  House 
Bill  No.  197  were  to  become  a  law  that  the  deputies  and 
assistants  of  the  county  collector  would  receive  compensation 
under  both  House  Bill  No.  197  and  Section  11107,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 

House  Bill  No.  197  seeks  to  justify  the  compensation  pro- 
vided in  House  Bill  No.  197  for  the  deputies  and  assistants  of 
the  county  collectors  by  providing  for  an  additional  duty  on 
the  county  collector  of  revenue  by  making  available  at  his 
office  copies  of  income  blanks  for  the  citizens  of  the  county 
who  may  desire  copies  of  such  blanks  and  to  make  it  known 
to  the  citizens  of  the  county  that  such  blanks  are  available 
at  his  office.  Of  course,  this  additional  duty  is  a  subterfuge. 

The  collection  of  the  State  income  tax  and  the  furnishing 
of  blank  forms  is  now  vested  in  the  Department  of  Revenue 
and  under  Section  11353  of  House  Bill  No.  676  of  the  Sixty- 
third  General  Assembly  the  Director  of  Revenue  has  the 
authority  to  establish  temporary  or  permanent  branch  offices 
in  the  State  and  also  has  the  authority  to  mail  income  tax 
forms  to  the  individual  income  taxpayer.  If  income  tax  forms 
are  to  be  made  'available  at  any  county  office,  in  my  opinion, 
it  should  be  the  assessor's  office  or  the  county  clerk's  office, 
but  regardless  of  that  all  of  this  was  wiped  out  by  the  creation 
of  the  Department  of  Revenue  and  we  should  not  commence 
this  early  to  duplicate  the  duties  of  the  Director  of  Revenue 
by  imposing  a  duty  on  the  county  collector  of  revenue  as 
provided  in  Section  2  of  House  Bill  No.  197  to  make  avail- 
able at  his  office  copies  of  income  tax  blanks.  This  would  be 
a  duplication  of  the  duties  required  of  the  Director  of  Revenue. 

House  Bill  No,  197  provides  for  the  employment  and 
compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants  for  the  collector  of 
revenue  in  counties  of  the  fourth  class,  coupled  with  a  pro- 
vision for  additional  duties  of  the  collector. 

House  Bill  No,  197  contains  more  than  one  subject  and 
violates  Section  23  of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945* 
Said  section  reads  as  follows: 

"Section  23.  No  bill  shall  contain  more  than  one  subject 
which  shall  be  clearly  expressed  in  its  title,  except  bills 
enacted  under  the  third  exception  in  section  37  of  this 


250  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

article  and  general  appropriation  bills,  which  may  em- 
brace the  various  subjects  and  accounts  for  which  moneys 
are  appropriated." 

Section  1  of  House  Bill  No.  197  pertains  to  the  employ- 
ment and  compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants  of  the  col- 
lector of  revenue. 

Section  2  of  House  Bill  No.  197  provides  for  additional 
duties  to  be  imposed  on  the  collector  of  revenue  by  law  and 
sets  out  the  duties.  This  is  an  entirely  different  subject  to 
the  compensation  and  salary  provision  for  the  deputies  and 
assistants  in  Section  1  and  in  my  opinion  violates  the  above 
section  of  the  Constitution. 

For  the  reasons  above  set  forth  I  do  not  approve  House 
Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  197. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  6,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  jtamasoN  CITY, 
June  6,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  198, 
entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  employment  and  compensation 
of  deputies  and  assistants  by  the  county  collector  of  reve- 
nue in  counties  of  the  3rd  Class,  and  for  an  additional 
duty  of  the  county  collector  of  revenue  to  distribute  state 
income  tax  blanks*" 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  251 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  198  pro- 
vides for  the  employment  and  compensation  of  deputies  and 
assistants  for  the  county  collector  of  revenue  in  counties  of 
the  third  class,  together  with  an  additional  duty  of  the  county 
collector  of  revenue  to  distribute  state  income  tax  blanks. 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  198  will 
be  referred  to  as  House  Bill  No.  198  in  this  message. 

I  have  been  unable  to  find  any  bill  which  has  been  enacted 
since  the  effective  date  of  the  1945  Missouri  Constitution  pro- 
viding for  the  compensation  or  salary  of  county  collectors  in 
counties  of  the  third  and  fourth  class.  Therefore,  the  com- 
pensation of  the  county  collectors  in  the  third  and  fourth  class 
is  computed  by  the  provisions  of  Section  11106,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  and  the  compensation  of  deputies  and 
clerical  hire  of  the  county  collectors  is  governed  by  Section 
11107,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  Said  section  is 
as  follows: 

"Sec.  11107.  That  the  officers  referred  to  in  section 
11106,  in  addition  to  the  maximum  amount  of  fees  and 
commissions  permitted  to  be  retained  by  county  collectors 
as  provided  in  section  11106,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri for  1939,  each  such  officer  may  retain  for  the  pay- 
ment of  deputy  and /or  clerical  hire  a  sum  not  to  exceed 
twenty-five  per  cent  of  the  maximum  amount  of  fees  and 
commissions  which  such  officer  is  permitted  to  retain  by 
said  section  as  so  amended,  but  such  deputy  and /or  cleri- 
cal hire  shall  be  payable  out  of  fees  and  commissions 
earned  and  collected  by  such  officer  only  and  not  from 
general  revenue*" 

Said  Section  11107  is  not  repealed  or  referred  to  in  any 
manner  in  House  ,Bill  No.  198.  It  is  my  opinion  if  House 
Bill  No.  198  were  to  become  a  law  that  the  deputies  and  assist- 
ants of  the  county  collector  would  receive  compensation  under 
both  House  Bill  No.  198  and  Section  11107,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939. 

House  Bill  No.  198  seeks  to  justify  the  compensation  pro- 
vided in  House  Bill  No.  198  for  the  deputies  and  assistants  of 
the  county  collector  by  providing  for  an  additional  duty  on 
the  county  collector  of  revenue  by  making  available  at  his 


252  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

office  copies  of  income  blanks  for  the  citizens  of  the  county 
who  may  desire  copies  of  such  blanks  and  to  make  it  known 
to  the  citizens  of  the  county  that  such  blanks  are  available 
at  his  office.  Of  course  this  additional  duty  is  a  subterfuge. 

The  collection  of  the  State  income  tax  and  the  furnishing 
of  blank  forms  is  now  vested  in  the  Department  of  Revenue 
and  under  Section  11353  of  House  Bill  No.  676  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly  the  Director  of  Revenue  has  the  authority 
to  establish  temporary  or  permanent  branch  offices  in  the 
State  and  also  has  the  authority  to  mail  income  tax  forms  to 
the  individual  income  taxpayer.  If  income  tax  forms  are  to 
be  made  available  at  any  county  office,  in  my  opinion,  it 
should  be  the  assessor's  office  or  the  county  clerk's  office,  but 
regardless  of  that  all  of  this  was  wiped  out  by  the  creation  of 
the  Department  of  Revenue  and  we  should  not  commence  this 
early  to  duplicate  the  duties  of  the  Director  of  Revenue  by 
imposing  a  duty  on  the  county  collector  of  revenue  as  pro- 
vided in  Section  2  of  House  Bill  No.  198  to  make  available 
at  his  office  copies  of  income  tax  blanks.  This  would  be  a 
duplication  of  the  duties  required  of  the  Director  of  Revenue. 

House  Bill  No.  198  provides  for  the  employment  and 
compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants  for  the  collector  of 
revenue  in  counties  of  the  third  class,  coupled  with  a  pro- 
vision for  additional  duties  of  the  collector. 

House  Bill  No.  198  contains  more  than  one  subject  and 
violates  Section  23  of  Article  III  of  the  Constitution  of  1945. 
Said  section  reads  as  follows: 

"Section  23.  No  bill  shall  contain  more  than  one  subject 
which  shall  be  clearly  expressed  in  its  title,  except  bills 
enacted  under  the  third  exception  in  section  37  of  this 
article  and  general  appropriation  bills,  which  may  em- 
brace the  various  subjects  and  accounts  for  which  moneys 
are  appropriated," 

Section  1  of  House  Bill  No.  198  pertains  to  the  employ- 
ment and  compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants  of  the  col* 
lector  of  revenue. 

Section  ,2  of  House  Bill  No.  198  provides  for  additional 
duties  to  be  imposed  on  the  collector  of  revenue  by  law  and 
sets  out  the  duties.  This  is  an  entirely  different  subject  to 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  253 

the  compensation  and  salary  provision  for  the  deputies  and 
assistants  in  Section  1  and  in  my  opinion  violates  the  above 
section  of  the  Constitution. 

For  the  reasons  above  set  forth  I  do  not  approve  House 
Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  198. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  6,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1S27~>13%9 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  219,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate,  transfer  and  set  apart  money  from 
the  post  war  reserve  fund  to  the  county  aid  road  fund." 

Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  214  was  en- 
acted by  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly,  approved  July  23, 
1946.  This  bill  created  a  County  Aid  Road  Fund  to  receive 
appropriations  by  the  General  Assembly  from  the  Missouri 
Post  War  Reserve  Fund  for  the  purpose  of  aiding  and  assist- 
ing the  improvement,  construction,  reconstruction,  and  restora- 
tion of  county  roads  in  the  manner  provided  in  said  act. 

It  is  my  understanding  that  said  act  was  to  provide  a 
road  building  program  for  a  period  of  five  years  and  the  sum 
of  two  million  dollars  was  to  be  appropriated  each  year  for 
said  program*  In  other  words,  the  total  appropriation  for 
said  program  by  virtue  of  said  bill  was  to  be  ten  million  dollars. 


254  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  1035  was 
enacted  by  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly,  approved  Octo- 
ber 14,  1946,  appropriating  out  of  the  State  Treasury,  charge- 
able to  the  Missouri  Post  War  Reserve  Fund,  the  sum  of  two 
million  dollars,  which  said  sum  of  two  million  dollars  under 
the  terms  of  said  bill  was  transferred  and  set  apart  to  the 
County  Aid  Road  Fund  to  be  apportioned  to  the  counties  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  said  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  214.    The  Attorney  General  of  Missouri 
in  an  opinion  dated  November  13,  1946,  held  said  House  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  1035  unconstitutional. 
However,  the  particular  question  that  the  Attorney  General 
was  rendering  his  opinion  on*  was  the  question  of  the  appor- 
tioning of  funds  to  the  counties  under  the  provisions  of  said 
Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  214.    I  think  there 
is  no  question  but  what  the  General  Assembly  has  the  right 
to  transfer  from  the  Missouri  Post  War  Fund  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund  the  sum  of  two  million  dollars  or  any  other 
sum.    In  fact,  said  transfer  has  been  recognized  by  the  State 
Treasurer  as  a  valid  transfer  and  a  County  Aid  Road  Fund 
has  been  set  up  on  the  books  of  the  State  Treasurer  and  said 
two  million  dollars,  authorized  by  House  Committee  Substi- 
tute for  House  Bill  No.  1035,  was  transferred  on  the  State 
Treasurer's  books  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund.    It  is  my 
opinion  that  the  transferring  and  setting  apart  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund  of  said  two  million  dollars  was  a  valid  transfer- 
In  order  to  meet  the  objections  set  forth  in  the  opinion 
of  the  Attorney  General,  there  was  introduced  into  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  House  Bill  No,  220  which  appro- 
priated out  of  the  State  Treasury,  chargeable  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund,  the  sum  of  two  million  dollars  or  so  much 
thereof  as  may  be  necessary  to  be  apportioned  according  to 
law  among  the  counties  of  the  State  which  comply  with  the 
provisions  of  law  granting  aid  to  counties  for  the  improvement, 
construction,  and  restoration  of  county  roads.    House  Bill  No. 
220  was  for  the  period  beginning  January  8,  1947,  and  ending 
June  30,  1947. 

Up  to  this  date  no  contracts  have  been  charged  against 
the  appropriation  provided  in,  House  Bill  No.  220  and  I  am 
reliably  informed  by  the  State  Highway  Department  and  the 
State  Comptroller  that  no  obligations  will  be  incurred  against 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  255 

said  appropriation  by  June  30,  1947,  and  therefore,  House 
Bill  No.  220  will  expire  June  30,  1947.  Said  sum  of  two  mil- 
lion dollars  transferred  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  by 
House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  1035  of  the 
Sixty-third  General  Assembly  remains  intact  in  said  County 
Aid  Road  Fund. 

House  Bill  No.  219,  enacted  by  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly,  transfers  and  sets  apart  from  the  Post  War  Reserve 
Fund  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  the  sum  of  ten  million 
dollars.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the  transfer  under  House  Bill 
No.  219  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  of  ten  million 
dollars  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  and  the  transfer  of  two 
million  dollars  under  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  1035  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  to  the 
County  Aid  Road  Fund  would  provide  a  fund  of  twelve  mil- 
lion dollars  in  said  County  Aid  Road  Fund.  I  am  sure  this 
was  not  the  intention  of  the  General  Assembly  but  that  the 
General  Assembly  intended  to  transfer  and  set  apart  the  total 
sum  of  ten  million  dollars,  and  not  the  sum  of  twelve  million 
dollars,  to  said  County  Aid  Road  Fund. 

If  House  Bill  No.  219  could  be  construed  to  be  an  appro- 
priation bill  the  Governor  under  Section  26,  Article  IV  of  the 
1945  Constitution  could  reduce  the  ten  million  dollars  pro- 
vided in  House  Bill  No.  219  to  eight  million  dollars,  which 
would  make  a  total  of  ten  million  dollars  in  said  County  Aid 
Road  Fund.  However,  it  is  my  opinion  that  House  Bill  No. 
219  is  not  an  appropriation  bill  but  a  bill  transferring  and 
setting  apart  the  sum  of  ten  million  dollars  from  the  Post 
War  Reserve  Fund  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  and  has 
to  be  approved  or  rejected  in  toto. 

It  is  therefore  my  opinion  that  House  Bill  No.  219  should 
not  be  approved  because  it  would  transfer  and  set  aside  a 
larger  sum  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  than  was  contem- 
plated or  intended. 

The  veto  of  House  Bill  No.  219  will  not  interfere  in  any 
way  with  the  road  building  program  for  the  fiscal  year  1947- 
1948.  As  above  stated,  there  is  now  in  the  County  Aid  Road 
Fund  the  sum  of  two  million  dollars  with  no  obligations  in- 
curred against  it. 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  provided  in  Section 
4,262  of  House  Bill  No.  173,  as  follows: 


256  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"Section  4.262.  There  is  hereby  appropriated  out  of  the 
State  Treasury  chargeable  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund, 
the  sum  of  Two  Million  Dollars  ($2,000,000.00)  or  so 
much  thereof  as  may  be  necessary,  to  be  apportioned 
according  to  law  among  the  counties  of  the  state  which 
comply  with  the  provisions  of  law  and  with  the  general 
plans  and  specifications  and  requirements  formulated,  as 
provided  by  law,  granting  state  aid  to  counties  for  the 
improvement,  construction  and  restoration  of  county 
roads;  for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1947,  and  ending 
June  30,  1948." 

I  intend  to  approve  said  appropriation  in  said  House  Bill 
No.  173. 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  will  reconvene  in  Jan- 
uary, 1948,  and  at  that  time  can  enact  a  bill  transferring  and 
setting  apart  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  the  sum  of  eight 
million  dollars  in  order  that  the  original  program  of  ten  mil- 
lion dollars  may  be  carried  out. 

For  the  above  reasons  House  Bill  No.  219  is  hereby 
vetoed  and  not  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
JUNE  30,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  o/  Repretent&ti'vet,  pp, 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JIFFEBSON 

Jtine  80,  1947. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No*  172*  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  257 

"AN  ACT 

'To  appropriate  money  for  the  payment  of  wages, 
salaries,  per  diem  of  the  officers  and  employees;  for  the 
original  purchase  of  property;  for  the  repair  and  replace- 
ment of  property;  for  the  operating  and  general  expenses 
of  the  Department  of  Revenue  and  the  several  divisions 
thereof;  for  the  payment  of  the  state's  part  in  assessing 
and  collecting  revenue,  for  the  period  beginning  July  1, 
1947,  and  ending  June  30,  1948." 

and  appended  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  follow- 
ing statement  of  the  items  to  which  I  object,  which  items  are 
returned  without  my  approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  stated, 
which  said  reasons  accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections 
to  said  items.  T 

Section  3.161.  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  item  of 
$25,000.00  in  this  section  to  be  set  up  as  a  State  Paper  Pro- 
curement Revolving  Fund  for  the  use  of  the  State  Purchasing 
Agent,  for  the  purchase  of  paper  for  the  reason  that  House 
Bill  No.  78  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly,  providing 
for  the  establishment  of  a  Paper  Procurement  Fund  to  be  ad- 
ministered by  the  State  Purchasing  Agent,  failed  of  passage 
in  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly.  There  being  no  statute 
authorizing  the  appropriation  provided  for  in  this  section, 
this  appropriation,  therefore,  is  vetoed  and  not  allowed. 

IL 

Section  3.162.  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  item  of 
$200,000.00  in  this  section  for  the  use  of  the  State  Purchasing 
Agent  for  the  purchase  of  paper  for  State  printing  for  the  rea- 
son that  House  Bill  No.  78  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assem- 
bly, providing  for  the  establishment  of  a  State  Paper  Pro- 
curement Revolving  Fund  for  the  purchase  of  paper  for  State 
printing,  failed  of  passage  in  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly, 

There  being  no  statute  authorizing  the  appropriation  pro- 
vided for  in  this  section,  this  appropriation,  therefore,  is 
vetoed  and  not  allowed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


258  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

JUNE  30,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1378-1381 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  30,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  445,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  for  the  support  of  the  State 
Government  for  payment  of  certain  contingent  and  inci- 
dental expenses  of  the  State  Government,  for  the  period 
beginning  July  1,  1947,  and  ending  June  30,  1948;  and 
to  appropriate  money  for  the  payment  of  various  forms 
of  relief;  for  the  several  departments  of  the  State  Govern- 
ment, several  boards,  bureaus,  and  commissions  and  state 
officers,  and  persons,  firms  and  corporations  for  the  pay- 
ment of  which  the  state  may  be  liable,  and  appropriating 
funds  for  other  purposes  for  the  period  beginning  July  1, 
1947,  and  ending  June  30,  1948,  and  prior  years/' 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 

I. 

Section  9,061.  I  have  approved  the  appropriation  in 
Section  9,061.  However,  there  is  a  question  as  to  its  validity. 
The  section  states  that  the  appropriation  is  for  the  relief  of 
the  S.  S.  Kresge  Company  because  of  the  over-payment  of 
foreign  corporation  qualification  taxes*  The  Supreme  Court 
of  Missouri  in  a  recent  case  entitled  State  ex  reL  H»  D.  Lee 
Company,  Inc.,  vs.  Bell,  Secretary  of  State,  195  S.  W,  (2d) 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  259 

492  held  that  the  domestication  tax  as  required  for  original 
entry  is  not  required  of  a  foreign  corporation  when  the  amend- 
ment of  the  articles  of  incorporation  of  the  foreign  corpora- 
tion are  filed  extending  its  corporate  existence  in  the  State  of 
Missouri.  However,  the  S.  S.  Kresge  Company  voluntarily 
paid  the  domestication  tax  and  the  courts  have  held  that  a 
voluntary  payment  of  a  tax  cannot  be  recovered  in  the  ab- 
sence of  a  statute  authorizing  it,  especially  when  the  payment 
is  made  under  a  mistake  of  law. 

The  General  Assembly  by  statute  has  authorized  the 
refund  of  the  erroneous  payment  of  sales  tax,  income  tax, 
inheritance  tax,  and  probably  other  taxes  but  I  believe  there 
is  no  statute  authorizing  the  refunding  of  foreign  corporation 
qualification  taxes.  However,  the  General  Assembly  in  the 
past  has  authorized  relief  bills  for  the  refunding  of  taxes. 
I  am,  therefore,  approving  the  appropriation  provided  for  in 
Section  9.061  but  I  deem  it  advisable  to  call  attention  to  the 
above  facts. 

II. 

Section  9.220.  I  approve  $10,000.00  of  the  appropriation 
in  this  section  and  veto  and  disallow  $10,000.00,  leaving  in 
effect  $10,000.00.  Under  the  act  of  the  Sixty-second  General 
Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  825,  providing  for 
the  construction  and  maintenance  of  a  State  Office  Building 
in  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  the  Board  of  Public  Buildings  of 
the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  selects  and  adopts  the  plans 
for  the  State  Office  Building,  employs  the  architect  or  archi- 
tects and  is  authorized  to  contract  for  or  secure  such  archi- 
tectural services,  advice  and  supervision,  and  for  the  furnish- 
ing of  detailed  plans  and  specifications  as  said  Board  may 
deem  best  and  proper.  That  part  of  Section  9.220  commenc- 
ing in  lines  8  and  9  with  the  words  "in  accordance"  down 
to  and  including  "Building"  in  line  12  is  legislation  that  is 
not  authorized  in  an  appropriation  bill  and  conflicts  with  the 
provisions  of  the  act  of  the  Sixty-second  General  Assembly, 
found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  at  page  825,  pertaining  to 
the  construction  of  the  State  Office  Building.  It  is  my  opinion 
that  the  sum  of  $10,000.00  is  adequate  for  preparing  detailed 
plans,  specifications,  and  estimates  for  the  construction  and 
equipment  of  a  State  Office  Building* 


260  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

III. 

Sections  9.250  and  9,260.  I  have  approved  the  appro- 
priation for  $1500.00  in  Section  9.250  and  also  the  appropria- 
tion for  $1500.00  in.  Section  9.260.  I  wish  to  point  out,  there 
is  no  specific  statutory  authority  authorizing  the  payment  of 
per  diem  and  traveling  and  other  expenses  to  the  members  of 
the  five  judge  committee  referred  to  in  these  sections.  How- 
ever, the  courts  have  held  that  even  in  the  absence  of  specific 
statutory  authority,  an  officer  is  entitled  to  reasonable  and 
actual  expenses  necessarily  incurred  for  the  proper  conduct  of 
the  duties  of  his  office  and  that  reimbursement  for  such  ex- 
penses is  different  and  separable  from  compensation.  It  is 
my  opinion  that  the  members  of  the  five-judge  committee  can 
legally  be  paid,  from  the  appropriations  provided  for  in  Sec- 
tions 9.250  and  9.260,  their  reasonable  and  actual  traveling 
and  other  expenses  incurred  during  the  proper  performance  of 
their  duties.  It  is  my  opinion  that  they  cannot  be  paid  a  per 
diem  and  that  said  appropriations  cannot  be  used  to  pay  the 
per  diem  of  the  members  of  said  committee.  Legislation  to 
pay  the  per  diem  of  the  members  of  this  committee  cannot  be 
included  in  an  appropriation  act. 

As  stated,  the  approval  of  these  appropriations  is  not 
intended  to  include  the  per  diem  of  the  members  of  this 
committee. 

IV. 

Section  9.290.  I  have  vetoed  and  disapproved  the  item 
in  line  76,  page  26,  Section  9.290,  "Earns  &  Co.,  St.  Louis, 
Mo —  . .  „ .  .$852.48"  for  the  reason  it  is  a  duplication  of  the 
item  for  the  same  company  and  for  the  same  amount  in  Sec- 
tion 9.050,  page  4  of  House  Bill  No.  445.  I  have  approved 
Section  9.050. 

V. 

Section  9.341.  This  section  is  for  an  appropriation  of 
$100,000.00  for  the  Missouri  School  of  Mines  and  Metallurgy 
at  Rolla  for  the  purpose  of  beginning  the  construction  and 
equipping  of  the  laboratory  part  of  the  Mineral  Industries 
Building,  for  the  period  beginning  January  8,  1947,  and  end- 
ing June  30,  1947.  The  expiration  date,  June  30,  1947,  evi- 
dently was  a  mistake.  The  construction  of  this  building  could 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M,  DONNELLY  261 

not  be  commenced  in  the  fiscal  year  ending  June  30,  1947. 
Therefore  said  appropriation  of  $100,000.00  is  vetoed  and  not 
allowed. 

VI. 

Section  9.360.  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appropria- 
tion of  $6,000.00  to  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Public 
Buildings  of  the  Department  of  Revenue  for  the  purpose  of 
furnishing  and  equipping  a  State  Capitol  cafeteria,  as  pro- 
vided for  in  House  Bill  No.  363. 

House  Bill  No.  363  was  enacted  for  the  purpose  of  estab- 
lishing a  cafeteria  in  the  basement  or  first  floor  of  the  State 
Capitol  Building.  At  the  present  time  there  is  no  space  avail- 
able on  the  first  floor  of  the  Capitol  Building  for  a  cafeteria. 
In  my  opinion  the  basement  of  the  Capitol  Building  is  not  a 
proper  place  for  a  cafeteria.  House  Bill  No.  363  authorizes 
the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  of  the  Department  of  Reve- 
nue to  establish  and  provide  the  necessary  facilities  for  a  cafe- 
teria restaurant  in  the  basement  or  first  floor  of  the  State 
Capitol  Building.  The  bill  then  provides  that  the  Director 
of  the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  shall  have  control  and 
management  of  the  cafeteria.  It  is  my  opinion  the  control 
and  management  of  the  cafeteria  should  be  vested  in  the  Board 
of  Public  Buildings,  Division  of  Public  Buildings  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Revenue  for  the  reason  that  the  Board  of  Public 
Buildings  has  the  general  supervision  and  charge  of  the  Capitol 
Building.  The  bill  then  provides  that  the  Committee  on 
Accounts  of  the  Senate  and  the  Committee  on  Accounts  of 
the  House,  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  Director  of  Public 
Buildings,  may  lease  the  facilities  as  a  concession.  The  Board 
of  Public  Buildings  having  the  general  supervision  and  charge 
of  the  Capitol  Building  should  also  have  the  authority  to  exe- 
cute leases  for  concessions  if  concessions  are  to  be  permitted 
in  the  Capitol  Building.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the  provisions 
of  House  Bill  No.  363  are  not  only  unworkable  but  they  con- 
flict with  the  general  authority  of  the  Board  of  Public  Build- 
ings which  has  general  supervision  and  charge  of  the  State 
Capitol  Building. 

For  these  reasons  I  intend  to  veto  House  Bill  No.  363. 
The  appropriation  provided  for  in  Section  9.360  is,  therefore, 
vetoed  and  not  allowed. 


262  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

VII. 

Sections  9.372,  9.373,  9.374,  9.375,  9.376,  9.377,  9.378  and 
9.379. 

In  Section  9.372,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  items  in 
lines  8  and  9,  namely,  General  Class  Room  Building  $325,- 
000.00,  Major  Agricultural  Building,  $425,000.00. 

In  line  10  of  said  section  I  approve  the  item  for  a  Chemi- 
cal Building,  $250,000.00,  for  the  reasons  hereinafter  set  forth. 

In  Section  9.373,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  to  Lincoln  University  for  a  Library 
Building  in  the  sum  of  $290,000.00. 

In  Section  9.374,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  for  the  Northeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College  for  an  auditorium  in  the  sum  of  $290,000.00. 

In  Section  9.375,  I  approve  the  item  in  line  8  of  said  sec- 
tion, the  top  of  page  33,  Power  Plant  and  Equipment,  $50,- 
000.00,  but  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  item  in  line  9  of 
said  section  for  a  Practical  and  Fine  Arts  Building  in  the  sum 
of  $310,000.00. 

In  Section  9.376,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  for  Central  Missouri  State  College  for 
a  Practical  Arts  and  Applied  Science  Building  in  the  sum  of 
$350,000.00. 

In  Section  9.377, 1  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appropria- 
tion in  this  section  for  Southeast  Missouri  State  College  for  a 
Science  Building  in  the  sum  of  $310,000,00. 

In  Section  9.378,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  for  Southwest  Missouri  State  College 
for  a  Library  Building  in  the  sum  of  $430,000,00. 

In  Section  9.379,  I  approve  $100,000.00  of  the  appro- 
priation of  $210,000.00  in  this  section  and  veto  and  do  not 
allow  the  sum  of  $110,000.00,  leaving  in  effect  $100,000.00* 
Said  sum  of  $100,000*00  is  approved  for  the  replacement  of 
boilers  and  other  equipment  in  the  Power  House  and  for  the 
beginning  of  the  construction  of  a  temporary  wing  to  the  pres- 
ent Power  House  for  the  purpose  of  housing  the  new  boilers; 
the  remainder  of  said  section,  namely  for  the  purpose  of  be- 
ginning construction,  equipping  and  furnishing  of  a  new  in- 
firmary, is  vetoed  and  not  approved. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY   .  263 

In  my  inaugural  message  to  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly  on  January  8,  1945,  I  stated  "It  is  estimated  that 
a  surplus  of  approximately  $18,000,000.00  will  remain  in  the 
general  revenue  fund  after  all  current  obligations  of  the  past 
biennium  have  been  paid.  I  recommend  that  this  surplus, 
and  any  accumulated  surplus  as  the  result  of  economical 
spending,  be  safeguarded  as  a  backlog  for  post  war  projects 
and  post  war  employment.  Since  the  war  and  business  inci- 
dent thereto  have  been  responsible  for  this  surplus,  it  would 
seem  not  only  the  part  of  good  business  but  a  moral  obligation 
that  it  be  set  aside  to  take  care  of  some  of  the  damage  this 
war  will  inflict  on  Missouri.  It  is  going  to  require  hard- 
headed  resistance  to  pressure  groups  by  both  the  General 
Assembly  and  the  Governor  in  order  that  this  surplus  be  judi- 
ciously spent,  and  I  earnestly  recommend  to  you  that  you 
regard  this  surplus  as  a  sacred  fund." 

Said  sum  of  $18,000,000.00  plus  an  additional  $12,000,- 
000.00,  making  $30,000,000.00,  was  transferred  by  the  Sixty- 
third  General  Assembly  in  1945-1946  to  the  Post  War  Reserve 
Fund  from  the  General  Revenue  Fund. 

In  my  message  to  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  in 
regard  to  the  Post  War  surplus  fund  on  January  8,  1947,  I 
stated:  "I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  resist  all 
efforts  to  raid  this  surplus  fund.  It  should  be  preserved  as  a 
sacred  trust  against  the  day  of  need  and  the  unforeseen  emer- 
gencies of  the  future/' 

This  admonition  has  not  been  followed* 

The  appropriations  passed  by  the  Sixty-third  and  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assemblies  from  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund 
wiped  out  said  $30,000,000.00  surplus  and  over-appropriated 
said  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  in  the  sum  of  $824,144.33.  In 
other  words,  if  all  appropriations  and  transfers  which  have 
been  made  were  approved  said  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  would 
be  over-appropriated  in  the  above  amount. 

I  vetoed  the  transfer  of  $10,000,000.00  from  the  Post  War 
Reserve  Fund  to  the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  which  was  pro- 
vided for  in  House  Bill  No.  219.  This  sum  is  still  in  the  Post 
War  Reserve  Fund.  However,  I  anticipate  that  when  the 
General  Assembly  returns  next  January  $8,000,000.00  will  be 
transferred  from  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  to  the  County 
Aid  Road  Fund.  If  so,  I  will  approve  said  transfer. 


264  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

The  appropriations  for  buildings  contained  in  the  above 
sections  of  House  Bill  No.  445  are  not  referred  to  in  House 
Bill  No.  176,  which  contains  the  ordinary  appropriations  for 
these  institutions.  It  is  noticeable  that  the  appropriations  in 
the  above  sections  in  House  Bill  No.  445  were  included  in 
the  omnibus  bill  in  the  closing  days  of  the  session.  Each 
educational  institution  was  provided  with  a  new  building,  and 
in  some  instances  with  more  than  one.  This  emphasizes  the 
recommendation  which  I  made  in  my  inaugural  message  as 
follows: 

"Several  of  the  institutions  have  made  requests  for  new 
buildings  and  others  have  requested  that  repairs  be  made 
to  buildings  already  erected.  These  are  matters  that 
should  receive  your  careful  and  serious  consideration. 
I  recommend  for  your  consideration  the  establishment  of 
a  State  agency,  probably  within  the  Budget  Department, 
where  experienced  personnel  would  have  charge  of  the 
erection  of  new  buildings  and  the  repairing  and  remodel- 
ing of  buildings  already  erected.  In  this  way,  institu- 
tions which  are  in  need  of  new  buildings  or  which  have 
buildings  in  need  of  repair  will  be  able  to  have  this  done 
and  the  unneeded  construction  of  buildings  will  be  pre- 
vented. It  will  also  stop  the  practice  of  institutions  com- 
ing  before  you  competing  with  each  other  for  new 
buildings." 

Here  we  have  the  situation  of  each  educational  institution 
competing  with  the  others  for  new  buildings. 

Each  appropriation  reads  Mfor  the  purpose  of  beginning 
the  construction,  equipping  and  furnishing/*  In  other  words, 
the  appropriation  is  for  the  period  July  1,  1947,  and  ending 
June  30,  1948,  and  it  is  known  in  advance  that  the  appropria- 
tion is  for  only  the  beginning  of  the  construction  of  the  build- 
ing* The  buildings  cannot  be  completed  within  the  fiscal 
year,  neither  can  they  be  built  for  the  amount  of  the  appro- 
priation. As  an  illustration,  the  educational  institutions  made 
requests  for  buildings  from  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  as 
follows:  Northeast  Missouri  State  Teachers  College  requested 
an  auditorium  and  equipment  to  cost  $396,203,00,  the  appro- 
priation by  the  General  Assembly  was  for  $290^000.00  for  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  265 

beginning  of  the  construction,  equipping,  and  furnishing  of 
the  auditorium,  which  means  that  this  institution  would  be 
required  to  request  a  future  General  Assembly  for  an  additional 
appropriation  of  at  least  $100,000.00.  The  Northwest  State 
Teachers  College  requested  an  appropriation  of  $584,000.00 
for  a  Practical  and  Fine  Arts  Building  and  equipment.  The 
General  Assembly  appropriated  for  this  building  $310,000.00, 
which  means  that  this  institution  would  have  to  request  a 
future  General  Assembly  for  an  additional  appropriation  of 
at  least  $274,000.00.  Central  Missouri  State  College  requested 
$676,416.00  for  a  Practical  Arts  and  Applied  Science  Building 
and  equipment.  The  General  Assembly  appropriated  $350,- 
000.00  for  beginning  the  construction,  equipping,  and  furnish- 
ing of  this  building,  which  means  that  this  institution  would 
have  to  ask  a  future  General  Assembly  for  an  additional  appro- 
priation of  at  least  $326,000.00  to  complete  the  building. 
Southeast  Missouri  State  College  requested  $592,000.00  for 
a  Science  Building  and  equipment.  The  General  Assembly 
appropriated  $310,000.00,  which  means  that  this  institution 
would  have  to  ask  a  future  General  Assembly  for  an  additional 
appropriation  of  at  least  $282,000.00  to  complete  the  building. 
Southwest  Missouri  State  College  requested  $720,000.00  for  a 
Library  Building  and  equipment.  The  General  Assembly 
appropriated  $430,000.00  for  the  purpose  of  beginning  the 
construction,  equipping,  and  furnishing  of  a  Library  Building, 
which  means  that  this  institution  would  have  to  ask  a  future 
General  Assembly  for  an  additional  appropriation  of  at  least 
$290,000.00. 

If  these  appropriations  and  other  appropriations  from  the 
Post  War  Reserve  Fund  were  approved  there  would  be  no 
funds  left  in  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  because  it  is  over- 
appropriated,  which  would  mean  that  additional  funds  to 
complete  these  buildings  would  have  to  come  from  General 
Revenue.  No  one  knows  how  long  there  will  be  a  surplus  in 
the  General  Revenue  Fund,  especially  if  heavy  demands  con- 
tinue to  be  made  upon  it.  I  consider  it  inadvisable  and  bad 
business  management  to  embark  upon  such  an  extensive  build- 
ing program  at  this  particular  time,  especially  in  view  of  the 
high  cost  of  materials  and  labor.  There  is  a  need  for  certain 
buildings  at  some  of  the  eleemosynary  institutions  and  the 


266  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

training  schools  which  I  feel  are  justified  and  should  be  con- 
structed, even  though  the  cost  of  materials  and  labor  is  high 
at  this  particular  time. 

I  think  the  General  Assembly  went  on  record  insofar  as 
authorizing  the  construction  of  library  buildings,  auditoriums, 
and  similar  buildings  are  concerned  when  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives placed  an  amendment  on  an  appropriation  for  an 
office  building  in  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  to  the  effect  that 
the  construction  of  said  building  should  not  be  commenced 
until  after  July  1,  1948.  The  argument  in  support  of  the 
amendment  was  that  on  account  of  the  present  high  cost  of 
materials  and  labor  the  office  building  should  not  be  built 
until  after  July  1,  1948.  This  appropriation  was  defeated  in 
the  Senate.  If  we  should  wait  until  after  July  1,  1948,  to  com- 
mence the  construction  of  an  office  building  in  Jefferson  City, 
which  practically  everyone  admits  is  needed,  there  is  all  the 
more  reason  why  we  should  wait  until  after  July  1,  1948,  to 
build  an  auditorium  or  a  library  building  or  a  science  building 
at  the  educational  institutions. 

The  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  enacted  an  appropria- 
tion for  $5,366,750.00  from  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund  for 
the  University  of  Missouri,  School  of  Mines  and  Metallurgy, 
Lincoln  University,  and  the  five  Teachers  Colleges  for  the 
purpose  of  building  or  purchasing  or  reconstructing  buildings 
for  temporary  buildings  for  the  students  at  these  different 
institutions.  No  funds  were  used  for  this  purpose  last  year 
and  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  reappropriated  said 
amount  of  $5,366,750.00  for  the  same  purpose  for  the  fiscal 
year  July  1,  1947,  to  June  30,  1948,  I  have  approved  this 
appropriation. 

In  Section  9.372,  I  approved  the  appropriation  of  $250,- 
000.00  for  a  Chemical  Building  for  the  University  of  Missouri. 
The  need  of  a  new  chemistry  building  at  the  University  has 
long  been  recognized.  The  Board  of  Visitors  recommended 
it  first  in  1929-1930  and  an  appropriation  was  requested  for  it 
as  long  ago  as  1931-1932.  Chemistry  is  an  essential  element  in 
the  education  of  many  college  students.  In  addition  to  pro- 
fessional chemists,  a  number  of  special  groups  of  students 
must  have  chemistry.  The  Chemistry  Department  at  the 
University  has  been  over  capacity  for  several  years*  Because 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  267 

of  this  emergency  I  have  approved  the  appropriation  for  a 
Chemistry  Building  as  provided  for  in  line  10  of  Section  9.372. 
The  Board  of  Visitors  which  made  its  recommendation  to 
the  Governor  and  to  the  members  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly  recommended  a  building  program  at  Missouri  Uni- 
versity, Lincoln  University,  Rolla  School  of  Mines  and  Metal- 
lurgy, and  the  five  State  Colleges,  also  the  School  for  the 
Blind  in  St.  Louis  and  the  School  for  the  Deaf  at  Fulton.  This 
report  which  supplemented  the  report  of  the  Board  of  Visitors 
made  in  1944  contains  a  comprehensive  study  and  survey  of 
the  needs  of  the  educational  institutions  of  this  State.  This 
Board  of  Visitors,  among  other  recommendations,  stated: 
"Unless  other  funds  are  available,  we  unreservedly  recommend 
that  a  bond  issue  proposal  be  submitted  to  the  people  of  the 
State  of  Missouri  for  the  accomplishment  of  this  purpose." 
It  is  my  opinion  that  when  the  cost  of  materials  and  labor 
become  more  stable  that  the  General  Assembly  should  seri- 
ously consider  recommending  to  the  citizens  of  Missouri  a 
bond  issue  for  the  construction  of  the  buildings  at  the  different 
educational  institutions  as  outlined  in  the  report  of  the  Board 
of  Visitors.  However,  I  do  not  believe  it  is  advisable  or  good 
business  at  this  time  to  embark  upon  an  extensive  building 
program  at  these  institutions,  especially  when  it  is  uncertain 
where  the  funds  are  to  come  from  to  complete  the  program. 
I  appreciate  the  fact  that  whenever  a  reserve  fund  is  built 
up  that  the  natural  inclination  is  to  try  to  get  a  part  of  it 
but,  as  stated  in  my  inaugural  message,  "It  is  going  to  require 
hardheaded  resistance  to  pressure  groups  by  both  the  General 
Assembly  and  the  Governor  in  order  that  this  surplus  be 
judiciously  spent.  .  .  ." 

VIIL 

Section  9.380.  In  lines  7  and  8  of  Section  9.380,  one  new 
cottage,  complete  with  furnishings  and  equipment,  $148,000.00. 
I  hereby  veto  ajnd  do  not  allow  $23,000.00  of  this  amount, 
leaving  in  effect  the  sum  of  $125,000.00.  It  is  my  information 
that  this  cottage  can  be  constructed  well  within  the  amount 
of  $125,000.00. 

In  line  10  the  appropriation  for  a  greenhouse  is  in  the 
sum  of  $5600.00.  I  hereby  veto  $3100.00  of  said  amount,  leav- 
ing in  effect  $2500.00  for  a  greenhouse.  It  is  my  information 


268  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

that  the  sum  of  $2500.00  is  more  than  adequate  to  provide 
a  greenhouse  at  this  institution. 

In  line  12  the  appropriation  for  a  laying  house,  $2,000.00, 
is  vetoed  and  not  allowed.  It  is  my  information  that  a  lay- 
ing house  has  been  built  from  the  appropriation  of  the  1946- 
1947  fiscal  year  and  there  is  no  need  at  this  time  for  this 
building. 

The  other  items  in  Section  9.380  are  approved. 

IX. 

Section  9,381.  I  have  vetoed  and  not  allowed  the  sum  of 
$340,000.00  of  the  appropriation  of  $700,000.00  for  nine  cot- 
tages in  line  7  of  said  section,  leaving  in  effect  $360,000.00  for 
nine  cottages.  In  other  words,  this  is  on  the  basis  of  $40,- 
000.00  for  each  cottage.  The  appropriation  for  the  nine  cot- 
tages is  general  in  its  terms  and  furnishes  no  definite  infor- 
mation. However,  it  is  my  information  that  cottages  of 
adequate  dimensions  and  capacity  can  be  constructed  for  not 
to  exceed  $40,000.00  each. 

In  line  8,  of  said  section,  I  have  vetoed  the  sum  of  $20,- 
000.00  of  the  $70,000.00  for  one  staff  cottage,  leaving  in  effect 
the  sum  of  $50,000.00  which  I  hereby  approve  for  one  staff 
cottage. 

In  line  9,  of  said  section,  I  have  vetoed  and  not  allowed 
the  sum  of  $90,000.00  for  a  Vocational  Building.  There  are 
other  buildings  at  the  Training  School  for  Boys  at  Boonville 
which  can  be  utilized  for  vocational  purposes.  The  present 
building  known  as  A  Company  building  can  be  repaired  for 
approximately  $3,000,00  and  used  for  additional  commissary 
space.  There  is  a  large  room  upstairs  in  this  building  which 
can  be  used  for  a  vocational  shop.  The  present  building 
known  as  C  Company  building,  which  is  a  large  building,  can 
be  repaired,  remodeled,  and  fireproofed  for  a  vocational  build- 
ing housing  six  or  eight  vocational  units  at  an  estimated  cost 
of  $20,000.00.  To  my  knowledge  no  provision  has  been  made 
in  the  present  program  for  the  repair  or  remodeling  of  these 
buildings.  Before  other  new  buildings  are  constructed  and 
large  appropriations  authorized  the  above  mentioned  buildings 
should  be  utilized  for  some  purpose* 

Line  10,  I  have  approved  the  appropriation  of  $200tOOO»- 
00  for  an  Education  Building. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  269 

Line  11,  I  have  vetoed  and  not  approved  the  appropria- 
tion of  $40,000.00  for  a  Chapel  Building.  There  is  a  division 
of  opinion  as  to  what  should  be  done  with  the  present  chapel 
building.  There  are  those  who  suggest  that  it  be  razed.  The 
Director  of  Public  Buildings  states  that  the  present  building 
can  be  repaired  for  use  for  approximately  $6,250.00.  It  is 
being  used  at  the  present  time  and  has  been  for  the  past  two 
years.  It  is  my  opinion  that  a  competent  engineer  should 
appraise  this  building  and  report  the  result  of  his  appraisal 
before  we  authorize  its  destruction  and  the  expenditure  of 
$40,000.00  for  a  new  Chapel  Building.  It  is  my  information 
that  the  proposed  new  chapel  building  will  accommodate  two 
hundred  persons.  The  present  enrollment  at  the  Training 
School  is  354.  The  present  chapel  building  has  four  hundred 
chairs  and  five  hundred  persons  can  be  seated  in  it.  Also, 
the  new  Education  Building,  in  line  10  which  I  have  approved, 
will  have  an  auditorium  with  a  seating  capacity  of  five  hundred. 
The  present  gymnasium  will  seat  several  hundred. 

In  line  12,  I  have  vetoed  and  not  allowed  the  sum  of  $40,- 
000.00  for  a  Garage  Building.  In  the  first  place  this  is  too 
much  money  for  a  garage  building.  Secondly,  I  think  it  should 
be  ascertained  whether  or  not  the  present  garage  building  can 
be  repaired  and  used  (ray  information  is  that  it  can  be  for  a 
nominal  amount) ,  also  whether  or  not  an  addition  can  be  built 
to  the  present  garage  building,  if  additional  space  is  needed. 

In  line  13,  power  plant  and  equipment  $200,000.00,  I 
have  approved  $120,000.00  of  this  item  and  vetoed  and  not 
allowed  $80,000.00,  leaving  in  effect  $120,000.00.  One  Hun- 
dred Ten  Thousand  Dollars  of  the  amount  approved  is  for 
new  generators  and  boilers  and  $10,000.00  is  for  the  repair 
of  the  present  power  plant  building.  The  boilers  are  in  a 
building  that  needs  some  repair.  The  generators  are  in  a 
building  that  needs  practically  no  repair.  The  Director  of 
Public  Buildings  states  that  the  repairs  for  the  power  plant 
can  be  made  for  less  than  $10,000.00. 

In  line  14,  equipment  for  above  named  buildings,  $105,- 
000.00,  I  have  vetoed  and  not  allowed  $45,000.00  of  this 
amount,  leaving  in  effect  $60,000.00  which  amount  I  hereby 
approve.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  garage,  chapel,  and 
vocational  buildings  are  deleted  from  this  bill  the  appropria- 


270  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

tion  for  equipment  for  the  remaining  buildings  is  therefore 
reduced  to  $60,000.00. 

In  lines  15,  16,  and  17,  repairs  and  equipment  for  present 
buildings,  including  razing  the  chapel,  tailor  shop,  and  boiler 
house,  $55,000.00.  For  the  reasons  heretofore  stated,  I  do 
not  approve  the  razing  of  the  chapel  and  boiler  house.  I  have 
no  way  of  knowing  how  much  of  the  appropriation  of  $55,- 
000.00  was  included  for  razing  the  chapel  and  boiler  house. 
However,  I  am  deducting  the  sum  of  $2,000.00  from  said 
amount  for  said  purpose,  leaving  in  effect  $53,000.00  for  the 
repairs  of  the  present  building  and  for  equipment  for  the  pres- 
ent buildings.  I  realize  that  the  buildings  at  this  institution 
are  in  need  of  repairs  and  also  in  need  of  equipment  and  I  am 
approving  the  greater  part  of  this  appropriation  for  that 
purpose. 

X. 

Section  9.394.  I  have  not  approved  the  appropriation  of 
$2,000.00  in  Section  9.394  for  the  Missouri  Commission  on 
Interstate  Cooperation  for  the  reason,  that  I  am  approving 
Section  8.030  in  House  Bill  No.  177  which  appropriates  $5,- 
000.00  for  this  same  Commission.  The  sum  of  $5,000.00  was 
appropriated  for  the  biennium  1943-1944  but  only  $1,263,76 
was  expended  from  this  amount.  In  1945  the  sum  of  $5,000.00 
was  appropriated  from  which  the  sum  of  $1,261.56  was  ex- 
pended. It  is  my  opinion  that  the  appropriation  of  $5,000.00 
as  provided  in  Section  8.030  of  House  Bill  No.  177  is  adequate 
for  the  Missouri  Commission  on  Interstate  Cooperation  for 
the  year  July  1,  1947,  to  June  30,  1948,  therefore,  the  item  of 
$2,000.00  in  Section  9.394  is  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  271 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

JULY  1,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Howe  of  Representatives,  pp.  1382-1383 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  1,  1947. 

To  the.  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  173,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  to  pay  the  salaries,  wages* 
and  per  diem  and  other  expenses  of  the  Civil  Officers  and 
employees  and  of  other  departments  and  agencies  of  the 
State  Government  as  follows:  the  Executive  Officers,  the 
Secretary  of  State,  the  State  Auditor,  the  State  Treasurer, 
the  Attorney-General,  Supreme  Court,  St.  Louis  Court 
of  Appeals,  Kansas  City  Court  of  Appeals,  Springfield 
Court  of  Appeals,  Circuit  and  Common  Pleas  Court 
Judges,  Special  Judges,  the  Judicial  Conference,  Magis- 
trates, the  Department  of  Business  and  Administration, 
the  Department  of  Conservation,  the  Highway  Depart- 
ment, the  Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations, 
the  Department  of  Agriculture,  the  State  Highway  Patrol, 
the  Supervisor  of  Liquor  Control,  the  Adjutant-General, 
the  Missouri  Military  Forces,  the  State  Service  Officer, 
and  Missouri's  participation  in  the  Council  of  State  Gov- 
ernments; for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1947,  and  end- 
ing June  30,  1948." 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 


272  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I. 

Section  4.010.  I  have  vetoed  and  not  allowed  $5,000.00 
of  the  $20,000.00  appropriation  for  Additions,  Repairs,  and 
Replacements  in  line  62a  on  page  3  of  this  section,  leaving 
$15,000.00  in  effect  for  Additions,  Repairs,  and  Replacements, 

Fifteen  Thousand  Dollars  is  the  amount  that  was  origi- 
nally requested  in  the  budget  for  the  ordinary  Additions, 
Repairs,  and  Replacements  item  and  is  the  amount  that  was 
approved  by  the  House  of  Representatives. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  it  has  been  several  years  since  the 
interior  of  the  Mansion  has  been  decorated,  and  the  further 
fact  that  the  installation  of  an  elevator  has  been  recommended, 
certain  members  of  the  Appropriations  Committee  of  the  Sen- 
ate requested  information  as  to  the  approximate  cost  for  such 
interior  decoration,  for  certain  repairs  and  the  installation  of 
an  elevator.  An  estimate  of  the  cost  was  furnished  to  the 
committee  and  the  committee  recommended  that  the  item  of 
Additions,  Repairs,  and  Replacements  be  increased  to  $39,- 
000.00.  This  increase  was  adopted  by  the  Senate.  However, 
the  conference  committee  reduced  the  amount  from  $39,000,- 

00  to  $20,000.00,  which  was  only  $5,000.00  more  than  the 
original  budget  request,  which  did  not  include  these  extra  items. 

As  the  interior  decoration,  certain  repairs,  and  the  instal- 
lation of  an  elevator  cannot  be  done  for  $5,000.00  said  item  is 
vetoed  and  not  allowed,  leaving  in  effect  $15,000.00. 

II. 

Section  4.170.  That  part  of  said  section  on  page  32, 
lines  17  to  23,  including  the  sum  of  $33,725.00  is  vetoed  and 
not  allowed.  Also,  on  page  33  of  said  section,  lines  46  to  56, 
inclusive,  including  the  sum  of  $200,000,00  is  vetoed  and  not 
allowed  for  the  reason  that  the  above  items  of  compensation, 
salaries,  and  expense  are  included  in  Section  9,383,  page  35  of 
House  Bill  No.  445  in  the  sum  of  $250,000,00,  which  amount 

1  have  approved.     Therefore,  said  sum  of  $33,725,00  and 
$200,000.00  in  said  Section  4.170  is  a  duplication  and,  there- 
fore, not  allowed . 

HI. 

Section  4.290.  I  hereby  veto  and  do  not  approve  $82,- 
000.00  of  the  appropriation  of  $150,000.00  in  line  29,  page  49> 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  273 

Section  4.290,  leaving  in  effect  $68,000.00  for  repairs  and 
replacements;  $68,000.00  is  the  amount  requested  in  the  budget 
for  this  item  and  no  explanation  has  been  given  why  a  larger 
amount  should  be  appropriated. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

JULY  9,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  189&-1397 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  9,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without 
my  approval,  House  Bill  No.  363,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  authorize  and  direct  the  Division  of  Public 
Buildings  of  the  Department  of  Revenue  to  establish  a 
cafeteria  for  state  employees;  and  providing  that  the 
Director  of  the  said  Division  of  Public  Buildings  shall 
have  control  and  management  of  said  cafeteria." 

House  Bill  No.  363  was  enacted  for  the  purpose  of  estab- 
lishing a  cafeteria  in  the  basement  or  first  floor  of  the  State 
Capitol  Building.  At  the  present  time  there  is  no  space  avail- 
able on  the  first  floor  of  the  Capitol  Building  for  a  cafeteria. 
In  my  opinion  the  basement  of  the  Capitol  Building  is  not  a 
proper  place  for  a  cafeteria.  House  Bill  No.  363  authorizes 
the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  of  the  Department  of  Reve- 
nue to  establish  and  provide  the  necessary  facilities  for  a  cafe- 
teria restaurant  in  the  basement  or  first  floor  of  the  State 


274  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Capitol  Building.  The  bill  then  provides  that  the  Director 
of  the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  shall  have  control  and  man- 
agement of  the  cafeteria.  It  is  my  opinion  the  control  and 
management  of  the  cafeteria,  if  one  is  established,  should  be 
vested  in  the  Board  of  Public  Buildings,  Division  of  Public 
Buildings  of  the  Department  of  Revenue  for  the  reason  that 
the  Board  of  Public  Buildings  has  the  general  supervision  and 
charge  of  the  Capitol  Building.  The  bill  then  provides  that 
the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  may,  subject 
to  the  approval  of  the  Committee  on  Accounts  of  the  Senate 
and  the  Committee  on  Accounts  of  the  House,  lease  the  facili- 
ties as  a  concession.  The  Board  of  Public  Buildings  having 
the  general  supervision  and  charge  of  the  Capitol  Building 
also  should  have  the  authority  to  execute  leases  for  conces- 
sions if  concessions  are  to  be  permitted  in  the  Capitol  Building. 
It  is  my  opinion  that  the  provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  363 
are  not  only  unworkable  but  they  conflict  with  the  general 
authority  of  the  Board  of  Public  Buildings  which  has  general 
supervision  and  charge  of  the  State  Capitol  Building. 

I  think  Section  2  of  the  bill  is  too  restricted.    It  states: 

"Section  2.  The  said  cafeteria  shall  be  for  the  use  and 
convenience  of  the  employees  of  the  State  of  Missouri, 
including  the  General  Assembly  and  its  employees." 

For  the  above  reasons  I  cannot  approve  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  275 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JULY  11,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1399-1400 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  11,  1947, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri; 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  181,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  10366  of  an  Act  of  the  62nd  Gen- 
eral Assembly  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages 
893  to  896,  both  inclusive,  relating  to  School  Moneys  and 
How  Applied,  the  Form  of  Warrants  to  be  Used  and  the 
Funds  upon  which  they  shall  be  drawn,  *by  striking  out 
of  line  133  between  the  words  "disincorporated"  and  the 
*  V  the  words  "by  state  or  federal  agencies"  and'  by  insert* 
ing  after  the  period  in  line  138  and  before  the  word  'No' 
in  line  139  the  following:  'When  any  real  or  personal 
property  remains  in  any  such  disincorporated  district  the 
county  court  shall  appoint  some  competent  person  to  act 
as  trustee  for  the  school  district  so  disincorporated,  who 
shall  sell  any  property  belonging  to  such  disincorporated 
school  district.  The  county  court  may  allow  a  reason- 
able fee  not  to  exceed  three  per  cent  of  the  proceeds  of 
any  such  sale.  The  remaining  proceeds  shall  be  placed 
in  the  county  treasury  and  distributed  in  the  same  man- 
ner as  other  funds  belonging  to  the  disincorporated  school 
district/  " 

House  Bill  No.  181  seeks  to  ameud  Section.  10366  of  atx 
act  of  the  Sixty-second  General  Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1943,  pages  893  to  896,  inclusive,  the  part  amended 
appearing  on  page  896* 


276  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Said  amendment  is  by  striking  out  certain  words  and  also 
by  inserting  certain  words.  Section  28,  Article  III  of  the  1945 
Constitution  provides: 

".  .  .  No  act  shall  be  amended  by  providing  that 
words  be  stricken  out  or  inserted,  but  the  words  to  be 
stricken  out,  or  the  words  to  be  inserted,  or  the  words 
to  be  stricken  out  and  those  inserted  in  lieu  thereof,  to- 
gether with  the  act  or  section  amended,  shall  be  set  forth 
in  full  as  amended." 

The  courts  have  strictly  construed  the  above  provision  of  the 
Constitution. 

In  Section  1,  page  2,  line  5,  after  the  word  "drawn"  and 
before  the  word  "be"  the  following  words  appearing  in  the 
title  are  omitted,  to-wit: 

"by  striking  out  of  line  133  between  the  words  'disincor- 
porated' and  the  V  the  words  'by  state  or  federal 
agencies.'  " 

However,  said  words  "by  state  or  federal  agencies"  are  prop- 
erly stricken  out  of  Section  10366  of  House  Bill  No.  181. 

On  page  3,  line  44,  after  the  word  "sum"  the  word  "of" 
should  be  inserted  because  it  appears  in  Section  10366  of  the 
act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  at  page  896. 

However,  there  is  an  error  in  House  Bill  No.  181  which 
I  consider  vital.  In  lines  133  and  134  of  Section  10366  of 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  on  page  896,  it  refers  to  "the  treasurer 
for  the  school  district,"  House  Bill  No.  181,  page  6,  line  143, 
refers  to  "the  treasurer  of  the  county."  No  reference  to  such 
change  is  made  in  the  title  or  in  Section  1  of  said  bill  and  as 
House  Bill  No.  181  is  an  act  to  amend  Section  10366  arid  not 
to  repeal  and  reenact,  the  particular  words  that  are  stricken 
out  and  those  that  are  stricken  out  and  inserted  in  lieu  thereof 
must  be  specifically  stated  in  the  title.  No  reference  is  made 
in  the  title  to  the  words  "the  treasurer  for  the  school  district" 
or  to  the  words  "the  treasurer  of  the  county/"  The  use  of 
the  words  "the  treasurer  of  the  county"  is  not  only  erroneous 
but  is  not  within  the  scope  of  the  amendment  set  forth  in 
the  title. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  277 

On  page  6,  line  139,  the  word  "are"  appears  before  the 
word  "levied."  In  the  original  section  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1943,  at  page  896,  this  is  "were  levied."  Said  change  of 
"were"  to  "are"  is  not  referred  to  in  the  title. 

On  page  6,  line  145,  the  word  "balance"  is  "balances" 
in  Section  10366  of  the  act  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943, 
at  page  896. 

Because  of  the  above  errors  this  bill  is  vetoed  and  not 
approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JULY  11,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1403-1404 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  11,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  290,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9387  to  9395,  both  inclusive,  be- 
ing all  of  Article  6,  Chapter  51  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  Missouri  State  School  for 
feeble-minded  and  epileptic,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof 
eight  new  sections  relating  to  the  same  subject  to  be  known 
as  Sections  9387,  9388,  9389,  9390,  9391,  9392,  9393  and 
9394." 

Section  9392,  page  4,  lines  2  and  3,  refer  to  the  Director 
of  the  Division  of  Mental  Hygiene.  This  same  reference  is 
made  in,  Section  9393,  lines  2  and  3;  also,  itx  Section  9393, 
line  15. 


278  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  view  of  the  fact  there  is  no  Director  of  the  Division  of 
Mental  Hygiene  because  House  Bill  No.  332  creating  the  Divi- 
sion of  Mental  Hygiene  was  not  passed  by  the  Senate,  there  is 
no  authority  of  law  authorizing  a  Division  of  Mental  Hygiene. 
Said  House  Bill  No.  332  was  pending  on  the  third  reading 
calendar  of  the  Senate  at  the  time  of  its  recess  on  June  12, 
1947.  As  House  Bill  No.  332  created  and  established  the  Divi- 
sion of  Mental  Hygiene,  it  is  the  key  bill.  Therefore,  House 
Bill  No.  290  would  be  ineffective  without  the  enactment  of 
House  Bill  No.  332. 

In  re-writing  House  Bill  No.  290  I  suggest  that  Section 
9387,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  be  included  in  the 
bill  for  the  reason  that  it  is  the  section  establishing  the  insti- 
tution known  as  the  Missouri  State  School.  Also,  in  re-writ- 
ing House  Bill  No.  290  in  Section  9387,  page  2,  line  14,  the 
word  "substantially"  should  be  "substantial."  I  also  call 
attention  to  the  fact  that  if  the  Missouri  State  School  No.  2 
at  Carrollton  is  to  be  used  in  connection  with  and  as  a  part 
of  the  Missouri  State  School  at  Marshall  that  reference  to  the 
administration  of  the  Missouri  State  School  No,  2  at  Carroll- 
ton  should  be  included  in  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JULY  11,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  j?»  1404 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  -JtoimsoN  CITY, 
July  11,  1047, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:   I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval  House  Bill  No,  291,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  279 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9634  and  9635  of  an  act  of  the 
61st  General  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  No.  456, 
approved  July  30,  1941,  and  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1941,  Page  320,  relating  to  transfer  of  management  and 
property  of  the  state  home  for  children  at  Carrollton 
to  the  management  of  the  Missouri  State  School  at 
Marshall." 

House  Bill  No.  291  repeals  Sections  9634  and  9635  of  an 
act  of  the  Sixty-first  General  Assembly  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1941,  at  page  320. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  Section  9634  of  the  act  of  the 
Sixty-first  General  Assembly  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941, 
at  page  320,  establishes  the  institution  at  Carrollton,  Missouri, 
known  as  Missouri  State  School  No.  2,  and  which  is  used  in 
connection  with  and  as  a  part  of  the  Missouri  State  School 
at  Marshall,  Missouri,  as  a  colony  for  the  feeble-minded  and 
epileptic  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Article  6,  of 
Chapter  51,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  I  do  not 
believe  that  said  Section  9634  should  be  repealed. 

Therefore,  I  have  vetoed  and  do  not  approve  House  Bill 
No.  291. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JULY  11,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  1408 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  'JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  11,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval.  House  Bill  No.  296,  entitled: 


280  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  26  to  30,  both  inclusive,  of  an 
act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  known  as  Senate  Bill 
No.  349,  approved  May  3,  1946,  relating  to  the  powers 
and  duties  of  the  division  of  mental  diseases  of  the  depart- 
ment of  public  health  and  welfare  and  the  management 
and  control  over  the  state  hospitals  and  state  schools, 
and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  five  new  sections,  relating  to 
the  same  subject,  to  be  known  as  Sections  26,  27,  28, 
29  and  30." 

House  Bill  No.  296  refers  to  the  Division  of  Mental  Hy- 
giene of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  in  a 
number  of  places  in  the  bill.  There  is  no  Division  of  Mental 
Hygiene  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare. 

House  Bill  No.  332  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly 
seeks  to  amend  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly, 
creating  and  establishing  as  a  department  of  State  govern- 
ment a  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  composed 
of  three  divisions,  one  of  which  was  the  Division  of  Mental 
Hygiene.  House  Bill  No.  332  passed  the  House  but  was  on 
the  calendar  for  third  reading  in  the  Senate  at  the  time  the 
Senate  recessed,  June  12,  1947. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  Division  of  Mental  Hygiene, 
as  provided  for  in  House  Bill  No.  332,  has  not  been  created 
and  there  is  no  authority  of  law  for  a  Division  of  Mental  Hy- 
giene, House  Bill  No.  296  will  have  to  be  vetoed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DOKNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  281 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
JULY  23,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  23,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir :  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  260,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  12098,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  by  striking  therefrom,  in  Line  43  thereof  the 
word  Tive'  and  by  substituting  in  lieu  thereof  at  the  same 
place  the  word  'seven,'  and  to  amend  Section  12145,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  by  striking  therefrom 
after  the  comma  on  the  sixth  line  the  words  'and  if  the 
ballots  and  the  poll  lists  still  do  not  agree  after  such  rejec- 
tion, they  shall  reject  all  ballots  not  numbered  as  required 
by  this  article,  and  no  ballot  not  numbered  shall  be 
counted/  both  relating  to  and  providing  for  the  registra- 
tion of  voters  and  holding  of  elections  in  all  cities  of 
300,000  to  700,000  inhabitants." 

There  are  several  errors  in  this  bill  which  make  it  nec- 
essary to  veto  it.  The  title  of  this  bill  states  that  it  is  to  amend 
Section  12098,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  by  strik- 
ing  out  the  word  "five"  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  word 
"seven"  and  to  amend  Section  12145  by  striking  out  certain 
words. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  this  act  is  to  amend  and  not  to 
repeal  and  reenact,  I  call  attention  to  Section  28,  Article  III 
of  the  1945  Constitution,  which  provides: 

"»  .  *  No  act  shall  be  amended  by  providing  that 
words  be  stricken  out  or  inserted,  but  the  words  to  be 
stricken  out,  or  the  words  to  be  inserted,  or  the  words 


282  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

to  be  stricken  out  and  those  inserted  in  lieu  thereof,  to- 
gether with  the  act  or  section  amended,  shall  be  set  forth 
in  full  as  Amended." 

The  courts  have  strictly  construed  this  provision  of  the 
Constitution.  Therefore,  only  those  changes  referred  to  in 
the  title  can  be  made  in  re-writing  the  sections  in  the  bill. 

The  first  error  appears  in  the  title,  line  10,  the  word  "so" 
is  omitted  between  the  word  "not"  and  the  word  "numbered." 
In  other  words,  in  Section  12145  of  the  1939  Statutes  it  reads 
"and  if  the  ballots  and  the  poll  lists  still  do  not  agree  after 
such  rejection,  they  shall  reject  all  ballots  not  numbered  as 
required  by  this  article,  and  no  ballot  not  so  numbered  shall 
be  counted."  (Underscoring  mine.) 

In  Section  1,  page  1,  in  referring  to  the  words  stricken  out 
of  Section  12145  a  part  of  the  words  to  be  stricken  out  are 
omitted.  In  other  words,  in  Section  1,  lines  6  to  9,  it  states: 

"and  if  the  ballots  and  the  poll  lists  still  do  not  agree 
after  such  rejection,  they  shall  reject  all  ballots  not  num- 
bered as  required  by  this  article." 

The  words  "and  no  ballot  not  numbered  shall  be  counted" 
should  follow  the  word  "article."  Of  course,  as  stated,  the 
word  "so"  is  omitted  from  that  part. 

In  Section  12098,  line  5,  are  the  words  "equally  divided," 
while  in  Section  12098  of  the  1939  Statutes  it  states  "divided 
equally/'  that  is,  the  words  are  transposed. 

In  Section  12098,  line  16,  the  word  "elect"  appears  in 
this  line  while  in  Section  12098  of  the  1939  Statutes  it  is 
"direct."  In  other  words,  the  present  section  of  the  Statutes 
reads:  "and  to  do  and  perform  any  and  all  acts  which  the 
said  board  or  any  two  members  thereof  shall  direct."  The 
word  "elect"  does  not  appear  in  the  title  and  has  aa  altogether 
different  meaning  from  the  word  "direct." 

Also,  in  line  22  of  said  section,  the  word  "persons"  is 
used,  while  the  statutes  uses  the  word  "person."  Then  follow- 
ing the  word  "persons"  in  line  22  or  at  the  beginning  of  line 
23,  there  should  be  the  word  "so,"  which  word  is  in  the  1939 
Statutes  but  is  omitted  in  copying  this  bill 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  283 

In  Section  12145,  in  line  1,  it  is  "elections,"  while  in  Sec- 
tion 12145  of  the  1939  Statutes  it  is  "election/*  In  line  2  of 
said  section  it  is  "boxes,"  while  in  the  Statutes  it  is  "box." 

When  you  undertake  to  amend  a  section  by  striking  out 
certain  words  and  inserting  other  words  in  lieu  thereof  or 
amend  by  striking  out  certain  words  you  are  limited  and  re- 
stricted to  the  words  stricken  out  and  inserted  or  the  words 
stricken  out. 

For  these  reasons  I  have  not  approved  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JULY  25,  1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Hottae  of  Representatives,  pp.  1527-1528 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  25,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No,  283,  entitled: 
"AN  ACT 

'To  appropriate  money  out  of  the  Post  War  Reserve 
Fund  for  the  repairing  of  present  buildings,  for  the  con- 
structing and  equipping  of  new  buildings  and  for  the 
acquisition  of  land  at  State  Hospital  No.  1,  Fulton;  State 
Hospital  No.  2,  St.  Joseph;  State  Hospital  No.  3,  Nevada; 
State  Hospital  No.  4,  Farmington;  Missouri  State  Schools, 
Marshall  and  Carrollton,  and  the  Missouri  State  Sana- 
torium, Mt,  Vernon,  for  the  period  beginning  July  1, 
1947,  and  ending  June  30,  1948*" 


284  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  the  item  to  which  I  object,  which  item  is  returned 
without  my  approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  stated,  which  said 
reasons  accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  item. 

I. 

Section  2.  The  appropriation  of  $1,500,000.00  for  a  hos- 
pital building  at  the  Missouri  State  Sanatorium,  Mt.  Vernon, 
Missouri,  set  forth  in  Section  2  of  House  Bill  No.  283  is  vetoed 
and  not  approved. 

There  have  been  no  plans,  specifications,  or  estimates  pre- 
pared or  submitted  for  the  construction  of  this  proposed  new 
hospital  building. 

There  are  several  reasons  why  it  would  not  be  advisable 
to  build  a  new  hospital  unit  at  the  Missouri  State  Sanatorium 
at  Mt.  Vernon  at  this  time. 

Statistics  show  that  a  much  larger  percentage  of  tuber- 
cular patients  come  from  the  southeastern  part  of  the  State 
than  from  any  other.    It  is  the  opinion  of  those  in  charge  of 
the  State  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  that, 
considering  the  present  rate  of  curing  tubercular  cases,  we 
will  reach  a  point  in  the  next  few  years  where  the  need  for 
additional  beds  should  gradually  decrease  rather  than  increase. 
That  there  would  be  a  distinct  advantage  to  the  State  at  this 
time  if  there  were  an  appropriation  for  the  construction  of  a 
hospital  unit  in  the  southeastern  part  of  the  State,  constructed 
on  a  pattern  which  would  permit  its  use  during  the  next  few 
years  for  tubercular  patients,  but  which  could  later  be  devoted 
to  general  hospital  uses  if  necessary.    With  the  new  hospital 
construction  program,  in  which  the  Federal  government  co- 
operates with  the  states  on  a  matching  basis,  the  institutions 
serving  only  tubercular  patients  should  be  relieved  somewhat 
because  one  of  the  requirements  of  the  Federal  government  is 
that  general  hospitals  built  under  this  program  shall  be 
equipped  to  handle  all  kinds  of  cases,  including  tuberculosis* 
There  would  be  no  particular  loss  to  the  State  in  locating  such 
a  hospital  unit  in  the  southeastern  part  of  the  State  from  an 
administrative  standpoint,  because  even  if  another  unit  were 
built  at  Mt.  Vernon  practically  the  only  thing  that  could  be 
utilized  from  their  present  equipment  would  be  the  X-ray 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  285 

apparatus.  I  am  advised  that  the  present  sewage  and  water 
facilities  at  the  Mt.  Vernon  Sanatorium  would  not  be  ade- 
quate to  carry  an  additional  hospital  unit  at  that  institution; 
also,  that  the  Sanatorium  at  Mt.  Vernon  has  about  reached 
the  point  of  maximum  efficiency  from  the  standpoint  of  size. 

If  there  should  develop  an  increased  demand  for  the  treat- 
ment of  tuberculosis  victims  as  a  result  of  the  mobile  X-ray 
units  now  in  operation,  there  is  no  reason  why  the  appropria- 
tion for  a  new  hospital  unit  should  not  be  used  in  that  part 
of  the  State  where  the  majority  of  the  new  cases  are  discovered. 

On  account  of  the  importance  of  this  subject,  the  number 
of  questions  involved,  and  the  amount  of  funds  proposed  to 
be  spent,  I  think  this  matter  should  be  given  further 
consideration. 

The  appropriation  provided  for  in  Section  1  of  House  Bill 
No.  283  for  the  Sanatorium  at  Mt.  Verixon  for  additions, 
repairs,  and  replacements  should  provide  more  beds  than 
there  are  at  present  at  this  institution  and  greatly  improve 
the  present  institution. 

II. 

Section  7.  I  am  approving  the  items  in  Section  7  of  House 
Bill  No.  283.  However,  it  is  my  opinion  that  the  appropria- 
tion for  the  construction  of  buildings  at  the  State  School  at 
Marshall  is  inadequate.  There  are  730  on  the  waiting  list  at 
the  present  time.  The  appropriation  provided  for  in  Section 
7  will  accommodate  only  about  sixty  per  cent  of  those  now 
awaiting  admission  to  this  institution. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


286  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
JULY  25, 1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1529-15S1 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  25,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No.  123,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Articles  2,  3,  and  4  of  Chapter  48  con- 
sisting of  Sections  8993  to  9033,  both  inclusive,  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  con- 
trol and  regulation  of  the  Missouri  Training  School  for 
Boys,  the  State  Industrial  Home  for  Girls,  and  the  State 
Industrial  Home  for  Negro  Girls,  and  to  enact  in  lieu 
thereof  twenty  new  sections,  to  be  known  as  Sections  8993 
to  9012,  relating  to  the  same  subject  and  providing  for 
the  control  and  regulation  of  the  State  training  schools 
for  boys  and  girls,  providing  for  payment  for  the  support 
of  children  in  said  training  schools,  authorizing  commit- 
ments of  children  to  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools, 
prescribing  the  powers  of  such  board  and  prescribing 
penalties  for  violations  of  this  act." 

House  Bill  No.  123  is  one  of  a  series  of  bills  recommended 
by  the  Missouri  Children's  Code  Commission. 

The  general  subject  of  the  treatment  and  correction  of 
delinquent  minors  and  the  jurisdiction  of  the  juvenile  courts 
in  Missouri  are  set  out  in  Sections  9673  to  9718  inclusive. 
Articles  9  and  10,  Chapter  56,  Revised  Statutes  o!  Missouri, 
1939.  The  repeal  of  the  above  sections  in  Articles  9  and  10 
and  the  enactment  of  new  sections  relating  to  the  same  sub- 
ject matter  was  introduced  as  House  Bill  No.  122  in  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  on  February  12,  1947,  along  with 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  287 

House  Bill  No.  123  and  undoubtedly  were  considered  as  com- 
panion bills.  These  two  bills  attempted  to  provide  a  com- 
plete scheme  for  the  care,  protection,  discipline,  and  punish- 
ment of  minors  within  the  meaning  of  said  acts,  who  are 
delinquent  or  are  charged  with  a  crime.  House  Bill  No.  122 
failed  of  perfection  in  the  House  of  Representatives  in  April, 
1947.  A  number  of  other  bills  recommended  by  the  Missouri 
Children's  Code  Commission  also  failed  of  passage. 

House  Bill  No.  123,  which  was  passed,  repeals  Sections 
8993  to  9033,  inclusive,  being  Articles  2,  3,  and  4  of  Chapter 
48,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  Among  the  sections 
repealed  are  Sections  8998,  9011,  and  9025,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939. 

Section  8998,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  pro- 
vides that  any  person  under  the  age  of  seventeen  convicted 
of  a  crime,  which  if  committed  by  persons  over  the  age  of 
seventeen  years  is  punishable  by  imprisonment  in  the  Peni- 
tentiary for  a  term  of  not  less  than  ten  years,  may  be  punished 
in  the  same  manner  as  provided  for  the  punishment  of  persons 
over  the  age  of  seventeen,  or  if  a  boy,  he  may  be  imprisoned 
in  the  Penitentiary  or  committed  to  the  Missouri  Training 
School  for  Boys;  and  that  any  boy  under  the  age  of  seventeen 
convicted  of  any  other  felony,  may  be  committed  to  the  Mis- 
souri Training  School  for  Boys,  and  that  any  boy  under  the 
age  of  seventeen  years  convicted  of  a  misdemeanor  may  be 
committed  to  the  Missouri  Training  School  for  Boys.  Said 
section  also  prohibits  the  punishment  of  such  a  boy  by  im- 
prisonment in  the  county  jail. 

Section  9011,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  pro- 
vides that  every  girl  over  the  age  of  twelve  and  under  the  age 
of  twenty-ones  convicted  of  any  offense  not  punishable  with 
imprisonment  for  life,  may  be  sentenced  to  the  Industrial  Home 
for  Girls  until  she  reaches  the  age  of  twenty-one  years.  Girls 
under  the  age  of  twelve  may  be  placed  under  the  control  of 
the  State  Social  Security  Commission.  In  this  connection  I 
might  add  that  Senate  Bill  No.  349  of  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly,  Section  31,  lines  1  to  11,  inclusive,  provides  in  sub- 
stance that  all  powers  and  duties  heretofore  under  the  control 
and  administration  of  the  State  Social  Security  Commission 
shall  hereafter  be  under  the  control  and  administration  of  the 


288  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare.  However,  if  Sec- 
tion 9011  is  repealed  by  House  Bill  No.  123  then  there  would 
be  no  law  governing  the  placing  of  girls  under  the  age  of 
twelve  years  under  the  control  and  jurisdiction  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  if  they  were  found  guilty 
of  violating  the  provisions  of  Section  9011,  because  such 
authority  would  be  taken  away  by  the  repeal  of  Section  9011. 
Nor  would  such  girls  be  committed  to  the  State  Board  of  Train- 
ing Schools  because  Section  8994  of  House  Bill  No.  123,  lines 
7  to  10,  inclusive,  specifically  states: 

'The  following  persons  shall  not  be  committed  to  such 
board:  (1)  any  child  whom  the  court  finds  to  be  in  need 
of  parental  care  in  a  family  home;  .  .  ." 

Section  9025  provides  that  every  Negro  girl  over  the  age 
of  ten  and  under  the  age  of  twenty-one  years,  convicted  of 
any  offense  not  punishable  with  imprisonment  for  life,  may 
be  sentenced  to  the  Industrial  Home  for  Negro  Girls  until 
she  reaches  the  age  of  twenty-one  years. 

These  are  the  only  sections  specifically  authorizing  the 
commitment  for  crime  of  boys  under  the  age  of  seventeen 
years,  white  girls  over  the  age  of  twelve  and  under  the  age  of 
twenty-one  and  Negro  girls  over  the  age  of  ten  and  under  the 
age  of  twenty-one,  to  the  various  training  schools,  although 
Section  9700,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  has 
not  been  repealed,  would  still  authorize  the  judge  of  any  court 
having  jurisdiction  of  delinquent  children  to  cause  such  chil- 
dren to  be  tried  under  the  general  law,  In  other  words,  if 
House  Bill  No.  123  were  approved  and  became  a  law  there 
would  be  no  specific  provision  authorizing  the  commitment  of 
minors  convicted  of  a  crime  to  the  various  training  schools* 
It  may  be  that  minors  tried  and  convicted  of  a  crime  could 
be  sent  to  the  Penitentiary  or  to  the  Intermediate  Reformatory 
at  Algoa  under  the  general  law,  since  Section  9700,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  provides  that  they  may  be  tried 
under  the  general  law.  However,  it  is  doubtful  if  a  court 
would  have  authority  to  commit  such  minors  to  the  various 
training  schools  in  view  of  the  repeal  of  the  above  mentioned 
sections  by  House  Bill  No.  123.  If  courts  do  have  a  right 
to  commit  minors,  who  are  charged  and  convicted  of  a  crimef 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  289 

to  the  training  schools  it  would  be  by  virtue  of  Section  8994 
of  House  Bill  No.  123  and  solely  by  virtue  of  the  use  of  the 
words  "Circuit  Court"  in  said  section,  and  then  only  by  im- 
plication, since  only  a  Circuit  Court  could  have  jurisdiction  of 
such  minors  when  they  are  charged  and  convicted  of  a  crime. 
Reference  is  made  in  Section  8994,  page  2,  House  Bill 
No.  123,  lines  4  and  5,  of  a  boy  or  girl  who  is  found  by  the 
juvenile  or  circuit  court  to  be  "in  need  of  residential  training 
school  education  and  discipline."  No  definition  is  given  in 
House  Bill  No.  123  of  these  words.  However,  I  assume  that 
the  use  of  this  language  is  an  attempt  to  remove  any  impli- 
cation from  the  classification  of  our  institutions  for  juvenile 
delinquents  as  penal  or  correctional  institutions. 

Suppose  minors  are  convicted  of  a  crime  and  committed 
to  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools.  Such  commitment 
under  House  Bill  No.  123  would  be  for  an  undeterminate 
period  of  time.  In  view  of  the  provisions  of  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  347  of  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly,  the  Board  of  Training  Schools  probably  is  author- 
ized to  release  on  parole  juveniles  committed  to  the  institu- 
tions under  its  control.  However,  Section  8996  of  House  Bill 
No.  123,  authorizes  the  Board  of  Training  Schools  with  the 
approval  of  the  Director  of  the  State  Department  of  Correc- 
tions, to  transfer  any  person  who  has  been  convicted  of  a 
crime  and  committed  to  its  custody,  and  who  has  reached 
the  age  of  eighteen  years,  to  any  State  adult  correctional  insti- 
tution. If  such  person  were  committed  for  an  indeterminate 
period  of  time  and  later  transferred  to  the  Penitentiary  or  to 
the  Intermediate  Reformatory  at  Algoa,  after  reaching  the 
age  of  eighteen  years,  how  long  would  such  person  have  to 
serve  and  what  board  or  person  would  determine  when  such 
sentence  should  be  terminated?  The  inmates  at  the  Inter- 
mediate Reformatory  at  Algoa  and  the  Penitentiary  serve 
definite  terms  and  not  indeterminate  terms  and  the  Statutes 
provide  a  procedure  for  their  release.  House  Bill  No.  123 
does  not  provide  for  such  release. 

Section  8994  of  House  Bill  No.  123,  if  it  can  be  construed 
to  apply  to  commitments  for  crimes,  only  authorizes  the  sen- 
tencing of  a  boy  over  the  age  of  twelve  and  under  the  age  of 
eighteen  and  does  not  provide  for  sentencing  boys  twelve  or 


290  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

under  as  does  the  present  law.  Neither  would  such  section 
authorize  the  sentencing  of  girls  twelve  years  and  under  to 
the  training  schools  who  have  been  convicted  of  a  crime. 
Neither  could  children  found  guilty  of  delinquency  be  sen- 
tenced to  such  training  schools  who  are  twelve  years  or  under. 

Section  9025,  which  is  repealed  by  House  Bill  No.  123, 
provides  for  the  commitment  of  Negro  girls  over  the  age  of  ten. 

Other  conflicts  could  be  mentioned  which  would  arise  if 
House  Bill  No.  123  were  approved.  I  believe  that  if  House 
Bill  No.  123  were  enacted  into  law  that  it  would  cause  con- 
fusion and  doubt.  I  believe  there  would  be  conflicting  inter- 
pretations by  the  various  circuit  courts  and  juvenile  courts 
in  dealing  with  girl  minors  under  twenty-one  and  boy  minors 
under  seventeen.  I  believe  the  law  should  be  clear  and  spe- 
cific with  reference  to  the  commitment  of  minors  who  are 
charged  and  convicted  of  a  crime  or  who  are  found  delinquent 
and  that  such  commitments  should  not  be  left  to  doubt  or 
implication. 

The  Children's  Code  Commission  submitted  a  number  of 
bills  to  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  and,  no  doubt, 
intended  to  provide  a  complete  scheme  for  the  discipline  and 
punishment  of  minors  under  the  age  of  twenty-one  years,  but 
it  is  my  opinion  that  House  Bill  No.  123  standing  alone  with- 
out the  support  of  other  bills  sponsored  by  the  Children's 
Code  Commission  would  cause  too  much  conflict  and  confu- 
sion if  it  were  enacted  into  law.  Therefore,  said  bill  is  not 
approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  291 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  17,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  Crnr, 
April  17,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  herewith  to  you,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  43,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  compulsory  attendance  of  wit- 
nesses in  criminal  proceedings  pending  in  courts  in  this 
or  other  states  when  such  witnesses  are  without  this  state 
or  without  any  other  state  in  which  such  criminal  pro- 
ceedings are  being  had  or  conducted." 

Lines  1  to  14,  inclusive,  Section  2,  page  2,  Senate  Bill 
No.  43,  provide  in  substance  that  if  a  judge  of  a  foreign  state 
certifies  under  the  seal  of  his  court  that  there  is  a  criminal 
prosecution  pending  in  such  court  or  that  a  grand  jury  inves- 
tigation has  commenced,  or  is  about  to  commence,  and  that 
a  person  within  the  State  of  Missouri  is  a  material  witness 
in  such  prosecution,  or  grand  jury  investigation,  upon  pres- 
entation of  such  certificate  to  any  judge  of  a  court  of  record 
in  Missouri  in  the  county  in  which  such  person  is,  such  judge 
shall  fix  a  time  and  place  for  a  hearing  and  shall  make  an 
order  directing  the  witness  to  appear  at  a  time  and  place  for 
the  hearing. 

Lines  15  to  31,  inclusive,  of  Section  2,  page  2,  provide 
in  substance  that  the  judge  in  this  State  may  determine 
whether  or  not  a  witness  is  material  and  necessary  in  a  cause 
pending  in  another  state.  If  such  determination  is  made  a 
summons  shall  be  issued  to  the  witness  with  a  copy  of  the 
certificate  of  the  judge  of  the  foreign  state  attached,  directing 
the  witness  to  attend  and  testify  in  the  court  where  the  prose- 
cution is  pending. 


292  MESSAGES  AND  PKOCLAMATIONS  OF 

It  has  long  been  held  by  eminent  text  writers  and  the 
courts  that  the  orders  and  judgments  of  a  foreign  court  have 
no  validity  in  a  sister  state,  and  that  a  state  court  may  not 
compel  the  attendance  in  a  state  court  of  a  witness  who  resides 
outside  the  state.  In  70  C.  J.  at  page  42,  the  test  on  this 
subject  is  stated  as  follows:  "A  state  court  cannot,  of  course, 
compel  the  attendance  of  a  witness  who  resides  out  of  the 
state."  The  Supreme  Court  of  Missouri  in  the  case  of  State 
vs.  Pagels,  92  Mo.  300,  1.  c.  308,  in  speaking  of  the  action  of 
a  trial  court  in  refusing  a  continuance  in  a  criminal  case  where 
witnesses  resided  outside  the  State  and  in  holding  that  the 
denial  of  the  continuance  on  that  ground  was  not  error  said, 
"and  the  refusal  of  the  continuance  involved  no  denial  of  a 
constitutional  right.  The  right  to  compulsory  process  for  wit- 
nesses does  not,  and  cannot,  extend  to  non-resident  witnesses." 

Another  Missouri  case  holding  to  the  same  effect  that  a 
State  court  may  not  compel  a  witness  from  another  state  to 
appear  in  such  State  court  to  testify,  was  the  case  of  State  vs. 
Butler,  67  Mo.  59.  This  was  a  criminal  case  wherein,  among 
other  matters  discussed  by  the  Court  in  the  case,  was  the 
question  of  the  execution  of  process  by  one  state  within  the 
jurisdiction  of  another  state.  The  Court,  1.  c.  62  and  63,  in 
holding  that  the  constitutional  guaranty  of  the  right  to  com- 
pulsory process  for  witnesses  meant  such  process  could  only 
be  executed  in  the  state  where  process  was  issued,  and  where 
the  defendant  was  being  tried,  said: 

".  .  .  As  to  that  provision  of  the  constitution  which 
allows  the  accused  to  have  compulsory  process  for  wit- 
nesses, we  discover  not  the  slightest  antagonism  between 
that  and  the  statute  under  consideration.  It  is  of  fre- 
quent occurrence  in  ciminal  prosecutions,  that  witnesses 
are  beyond  the  reach  of  compulsory  process  of  that  juris- 
diction where  the  prisoner  is  arrested,  and  yet  this  is  never 
deemed  to  be  an  obstacle  in  the  way  of  ultimate  con- 
viction. If  it  were,  many  a  felon  would  escape  punish- 
ment altogether.  That  constitutional  provision  has  evi- 
dent reference  to  only  such  process  as  the  State,  where 
the  prosecution,  is  had,  can  execute  within  her  own  borders. 
If  the  argument  that  defendant  cannot  be  tried  but  where 
he  can  have  compulsory  process  for  his  witnesses,  be 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  293 

sound,  then  when  taken  to  Kansas  to  be  tried  for  the 
original  larceny,  precisely  the  same  difficulty  would  be 
encountered,  for  on  arrival  there,  the  State  of  Kansas 
would  possess  no  power  to  execute  criminal  process  with- 
in our  borders  for  defendant's  witnesses  resident  in  this 
State:  .  .  .  ." 

Numerous  other  states  have  announced  the  same  rule  and 
holding.  See  following  cases:  State  ex  rel.  Brainard  vs.  Dis- 
trict Court,  243  Pac.  123  (Wyoming).  Hey  vs.  Emerson,  135 
S.  W.  294  (Kentucky).  State  ex  rel.  Coe  vs.  District  Court, 
235  Pac.  766  (Montana).  Diamond  vs.  Earle,  105  N.  E.  363 
(Massachusetts).  Redmond  vs.  State,  59  So.  181  (Alabama). 
Burns  vs.  Armine,  et  al.,  131  Pac.  (2d)  884  (Kansas). 

It  is  equally  well  settled  that  it  is  beyond  the  power  of 
the  legislature  to  authorize  process  to  be  effective  outside  the 
territory  of  the  state.  State  ex  rel.  v.  Wilder,  196  Mo.  418, 
1.  c.  431. 

Only  one  case  is  found  in  the  reports  holding  that  a  statute 
authorizing  a  state  court  to  compel  a  witness  in  the  state  to 
appear  and  testify  in  a  criminal  trial  in  an  adjoining  state  has 
been  held  constitutional.  That  is  the  case  of  Commonwealth 
of  Massachusetts  vs.  Klaus,  130  N.  Y.  S.  713.  However,  one 
of  the  strong  reasons  for  upholding  the  statute,  that  due 
process  of  law  was  accorded  the  witness,  was  the  following 
statement,  1.  c.  717,  "he  must  be  given  notice  and  an  oppor- 
tunity to  be  heard  before  a  subpoena  can  be  issued." 

Lines  32  to  42,  inclusive,  Section  2,  pages  2  and  3,  are 
as  follows: 

"If  said  certificate  recommends  that  the  witness  be  taken 
into  immediate  custody  and  delivered  to  an  officer  of  the 
requesting  state  to  assure  his  attendance  in  the  request- 
ing state,  such  judge  may,  in  lieu  of  notification  of  the 
hearing,  direct  that  such  witness  be  forthwith  brought 
before  him  for  said  hearings;  and  the  judge  at  the  hearing 
being  satisfied  of  the  desirability  of  such  custody  and 
delivery,  for  which  determination  the  certificate  shall  be 
prima  facie  proof  of  such  desirability  may,  in  lieu  of  issu- 
ing subpoena  or  summons,  order  that  said  witness  be 
forthwith  taken  into  custody  and  delivered  to  an  officer 
of  the  requesting  state." 


294  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

It  will  be  noted  that  in  lines  11  to  14  of  Section  2  it  is 
provided  that  "such  judge  shall  fix  a  time  and  place  for  a 
hearing  and  shall  make  an  order  directing  the  witness  to  appear 
at  a  time  and  place  certain  for  the  hearing."  Also,  it  will  be 
noted  in  lines  15  and  16  of  Section  2  that  "if  at  a  hearing  the 
judge  determines  that  the  witness  is  material  and  necessary 
.  .  *  (Lines  24  to  29)  he  shall  issue  a  summons  with  a  copy 
of  the  certificate  attached,  directing  the  witness  to  attend  aad 
testify  in  the  court  where  the  prosecution  is  pending,  etc." 

The  above  provision  is  in  direct  conflict  with  the  provisi- 
sion  in  lines  32  to  42,  inclusive,  of  Section  2,  whereby  provi- 
sion is  neither  made  for  notice  of  hearing  nor  the  issuance  of 
summons.  In  fact,  it  is  stated  in  lines  32  to  42,  that  if  said 
certificate  (which  means  the  certificate  of  the  court  of  record 
of  a  foreign  state)  recommends  that  the  witness  be  taken  into 
immediate  custody  and  delivered  to  an  officer  of  the  request- 
ing state  to  assure  his  attendance  in  the  requesting  state, 
such  judge  may  direct  that  such  witness  be  forthwith  brought 
before  him  for  hearing  without  the  benefit  of  notice  of  such 
hearing;  and  the  judge  at  the  hearing  being  satisfied  of  the 
desirability  of  such  custody  and  delivery  may  order  that  said 
witness  be  forthwith  taken  into  custody  and  delivered  to  an 
officer  of  the  requesting  state.  According  to  this  procedure  it 
is  not  necessary  that  the  judge  determine  that  the  witness  is 
material  and  necessary,  that  it  will  not  cause  undue  hardship 
to  the  witness  to  be  compelled  to  attend  and  testify  in  the 
prosecution  or  a  grand  jury  investigation  in  the  other  state, 
and  that  the  laws  of  the  state  in  which  the  prosecution  is 
pending,  or  grand  jury  investigation  has  commenced  or  is 
about  to  commence,  (and  of  any  other  state  through  which 
the  witness  may  be  required  to  pass  by  ordinary  course  of 
travel),  will  give  to  him  protection  from  arrest  and  the  serv- 
ice of  civil  and  criminal  process,  but  merely  that  the  judge 
be  satisfied  of  the  desirability  of  such  custody  and  delivery. 
Neither  is  it  made  necessary  for  a  subpoena  to  be  issued. 

This  is  a  flagrant  and  oppressive  denial  of  the  rights  of 
the  citizen  and  constitutes  a  violation  of  the  due  process  of 
law  clause  of  the  14th  Amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the 
United  States,  which  provides  ".  .  .  No  State  shall  make 
or  enforce  any  law  which  shall  abridge  the  privileges  or  immu- 
nities of  citizens  of  the  United  States,  nor  shall  any  State 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  295 

deprive  any  person  of  life,  liberty  or  property  without  due 
process  of  law,  nor  deny  to  any  person  within  its  jurisdiction 
the  equal  protection  of  the  laws,"  and  it  violates  Section  10, 
Article  1  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri  which  provides  "That 
no  person  shall  be  deprived  of  life,  liberty  or  property  without 
due  process  of  law." 

It  would  be  difficult  to  imagine  a  more  definite  denial  of 
the  process  of  the  law  than  is  revealed  in  lines  32  to  37,  inclu- 
sive, of  Section  2  of  said  MIL  In  other  words,  if  the  certificate 
of  the  court  of  a  foreign  state  recommends  that  a  witness  in 
Missouri  "be  taken  into  immediate  custody  and  delivered  to 
an  officer  of  the  foreign  state  to  assure  his  attendance  in  the 
foreign  state,  the  judge  in  Missouri  may  without  notice  to  the 
witness  of  a  hearing  direct  that  such  witness  be  brought  be- 
fore him  for  a  hearing;  and  the  judge  at  the  hearing  being 
satisfied  not  that  the  witness  is  material  and  necessary  but  that 
the  custody  and  delivery  of  the  witness  is  desirable,  may  in 
lieu  of  issuing  a  subpoena  or  summons,  order  the  witness  to 
be  forthwith  taken  into  custody  and  delivered  to  an  officer  of 
the  foreign  state.  The  order  directing  the  witness  to  appear 
for  a  hearing,  as  is  provided  for  in  lines  12  to  14,  inclusive,  of 
Section  2,  is  brushed  aside  by  the  certificate  of  a  judge  of  a 
foreign  state  saying  that  a  citizen  of  this  state  should  be  taken 
forthwith  into  personal  custody  and  delivered  to  an  officer  of 
a  foreign  state.  The  witness  is  thereby  denied  the  right  of 
notice  of  a  hearing  which  may  result  in  the  removal  from  the 
state  of  a  citizen  to  undergo  the  hazards  of  any  eventuality 
that  might  transpire  in  his  sojourn  in  the  foreign  state.  Under 
these  circumstances  the  witness  would  certainly  be  taken  into 
manual  custody  against  his  will  without  a  hearing  and  taken 
to  a  foreign  state  to  testify  in  a  proceeding  in  that  state.  I 
cannot  believe  that  the  courts  of  Missouri  would  uphold  the 
validity  of  a  statute  of  that  kind. 

There  was  a  strong  dissenting  opinion  in  the  above  case 
of  Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts  vs.  Klaus. 

I  think  Senate  Bill  No.  43  is  much  broader  than  the 
statute  referred  to  in  the  case  of  Commonwealth  of  Massa- 
chusetts vs.  Klaus. 

In  Senate  Bill  No.  43,  as  above  stated,  the  citizen  witness 
may  be  denied  a  notice  and  hearing  altogether,  according  to 
the  certificate  of  the  judge  of  a  foreign  state  court,  or  the  order 


296  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

of  a  judge  of  a  court  of  record  in  this  state  and  the  witness 
may  be  taken  into  custody  and  delivered  to  the  officer  of  the 
requesting  state  to  assure  his  attendance  in  the  requesting 
state. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Senate  Bill  No.  43  is  not  only  invalid 
and  unconstitutional  but  that  it  is  bad  in  principle  and 
precedent. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  have  vetoed  Senate  Bill  No.  43. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

MAY  26,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2159-21&1 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  26,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  451,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  to  pay  the  salaries,  wages 
and  per  diem  of  the  officers  and  employees,  etc.,  of  the 
State  Department  of  Corrections,  including  the  State 
Penitentiary,  the  Intermediate  Reformatory  at  Algoa,  the 
Training  School  for  Boys,  the  Training  School  for  Girls, 
the  Training  School  for  Negro  Girls,  and  the  Board  of 
Probation  and  Parole;  the  Eleemosynary  Institutions  of 
the  State;  and  the  pay  of  charity  patients  at  county  hos- 
pitals, for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1948,  and  ending 
June  30,  1949." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  297 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 

The  following  items  are  vetoed  and  not  approved:  Page 
12,  Section  5.050,  lines  91  to  111,  inclusive: 

'Tor  the  Training  School  for  Boys,  payable  out  of  that 
part  of  the  General  Revenue  set  apart  for  the  free  public 
schools  of  Missouri,  as  follows: 

A.  Personal  Service: 

For  salaries,  wages  and  per  diem  of  the  educational 

director,  principals,  teachers  and  instructors . .  $5,000.00 

B.  &  C.    Additions,  Repairs  and  Replacements: 
For  the  original  purchase  of  and  the  repair  and 

replacement  of  books,  educational,  scientific, 
vocational  and  recreational  equipment $5,000.00 

D.    Operation: 

For  the  general  expenses  of  the  education  pro- 
gram of  the  school,  including  educational, 
scientific,  vocational  and  recreational  sup- 
plies, and  all  other  necessary  current  operat- 
ing expenses,  exclusive  of  building  mainte- 
nance   $7,500.00 


Total $17,500.00" 

Pages  15  and  16,  Section  5.060,  lines  74  to  90,  inclusive: 

"For  the  Training  School  for  Girls,  payable  out  of  that 
part  of  the  General  Revenue  set  apart  for  the  free  public 
schools  of  Missouri,  as  follows: 

B.  &  C.    Additions,  Repairs  and  Replacements: 
For  the  original  purchase  of  and  the  repair  and 
replacement  of  books,  educational,  scientific, 
vocational  and  recreational  equipment $1,500.00 


298  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

D.    Operation: 

For  the  general  expenses  of  the  education  program 
of  the  school,  including  educational,  scientific, 
vocational  and  recreational  supplies,  and  all 
other  necessary  current  operating  expenses, 
exclusive  of  building  maintenance $3,000.00 


Total. $4,500.0.0" 

Page  19,  Section  5.070,  lines  61  to  77,  inclusive: 

'Tor  the  Training  School  for  Negro  Girls,  payable  out  of 
that  part  of  the  General  Revenue  set  apart  for  the  free  public 
schools  of  Missouri,  as  follows: 

B.  &  C,    Additions,  Repairs  and  Replacements: 
For  the  original  purchase  of  and  the  repair  and 
replacement  of  books,  educational,  scientific, 
vocational  and  recreational  equipment $1,000.00 

D.    Operation: 

For  the  general  expenses  of  the  education  pro- 
gram of  the  school,  including  educational, 
scientific,  vocational  and  recreational  supplies, 
and  all  other  necessary  current  operating  ex- 
penses, exclusive  of  building  maintenance $500.00 


Total $1,500.00" 

It  will  be  noted  that  in  each  of  the  above  sections  the  appro- 
priation is  "payable  out  of  that  part  of  the  General  Revenue 
set  apart  for  the  free  public  schools  of  Missouri." 

Section  3  (b),  Article  IX  of  the  1945  Constitution  of  Mis- 
souri provides  that  if  the  public  school  fund  shall  be  insufficient 
to  sustain  free  schools  for  at  least  eight  months  in  every  year 
in  each  school  district  of  the  state,  the  General  Assembly  may 
provide  for  such  deficiency. 

Section  10323,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  con- 
tains a  definition  of  "public  schools"  and  classifies  the  public 
schools  as  common,  consolidated,  town  and  city  school  districts. 
This  definition  has  been  modified  by  the  General  Assembly 
only  in  Section  10845,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1689, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  299 

which  provides  that  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind  and 
Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf  are  to  be  included  and  to  be  a 
part  of  the  section  of  Special  Education  within  the  Division 
of  Public  Schools. 

The  General  Assembly  has  not  changed  Section  10323 
since  the  adoption  of  the  1945  Constitution  and  it  is  my 
opinion  that  the  definition  of  "public  schools"  in  said  section 
does  not  include  the  State  training  schools. 

Section  10454,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1704,  pro- 
vides for  the  distribution  of  State  funds  to  the  school  districts 
of  the  State  which  are  required  to  maintain  a  public  school 
or  schools,  for  at  least  eight  months  in  each  school  year.  Such 
districts  are  entitled  to  equalization  quotas  and  I  believe  that 
such  section  could  not  in  any  way  authorize  the  State  train- 
ing schools  to  share  in  such  program,  since  such  schools  are 
not  under  a  district  board  of  directors  and  they  do  not  levy 
a  tax  for  the  support  of  such  schools. 

It  should  be  borne  in  mind  that  the  training  schools  take 
only  children  who  are  sent  to  them  because  of  some  violation 
of  the  law  or  because  of  their  being  delinquent.  They  do  have 
an  opportunity  to  go  to  school  while  there  but  they  are  not 
sent  to  such  schools  for  education  alone.  They  are  sent  to 
such  schools  by  an  order  of  court. 

For  the  above  reasons  I  do  not  believe  that  the  appropria- 
tions in  lines  91  to  111,  page  12,  Section  5.050,  lines  74  to  90, 
pages  15  and  16,  Section  5.060  and  lines  61  to  77,  page  19, 
Section  5.070,  should  be  paid  out  of  that  part  of  the  General 
Revenue  set  apart  for  the  free  public  schools  of  Missouri  and, 
therefore,  said  items  are  vetoed  and  not  approved. 

The  remaining  items  in  said  sections  and  the  remaining 
sections  of  said  House  Bill  No.  451  are  hereby  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


300  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 

MAY  28,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  2125-2126 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
MAY  28,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  90,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  compromise  and  settlement  of 
inheritance  or  death  tax  claims  of  this  and  other  states 
upon  the  estate  of  a  decedent  in  cases  of  controversy  be- 
tween such  states  over  the  domicile  of  said  decedent,  and 
to  provide  for  the  arbitration  of  controversies  between 
this  and  other  states  involving  the  domicile  of  a  decedent 
for  the  purpose  of  establishing  inheritance  tax  liability." 

This  bill  provides,  among  other  things,  that  when  the 
Director  of  Revenue  claims  that  a  decedent  was  domiciled  in 
this  State  at  the  time  of  his  death  and  the  tax  authorities  of 
another  state  or  states  make  a  like  claim  on  behalf  of  their 
state  or  states,  the  Director  of  Revenue  may,  with  the  approval 
of  the  Attorney  General,  make  a  written  agreement  with  the 
other  taxing  authorities  and  with  the  executor  or  adminis- 
trator to  submit  the  controversy  to  the  decision  of  a  board 
consisting  of  one  or  any  uneven  number  of  arbitrators.  The 
executors  or  administrator  is  hereby  authorized  to  make  the 
agreement.  The  parties  to  the  agreement  shall  select  the  arbi- 
trator or  arbitrators.  The  board  shall  hold  hearings  and 
evidence  may  be  presented  for  the  purpose  of  determining 
the  domicile  of  the  decedent  at  the  time  of  his  death.  This 
determination  shall  be  final  for  purposes  of  imposing  and  col- 
lecting death  taxes  but  for  no  other  purpose. 


GOVERNOB  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  301 

The  above  provision,  that  the  determination  of  the  board 
shall  be  final  for  purposes  of  imposing  and  collecting  death 
taxes,  is  found  in  Section  5,  page  3,  lines  3  and  4. 

In  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly,  found  in 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  pages  1504  to  1509,  inclusive,  it  is 
provided  (Section  10)  that  any  person  who  has  exhausted  all 
administrative  remedies  provided  by  law  and  who  is  aggrieved 
by  a  final  decision  in  a  contested  case,  whether  such  decision 
is  affirmative  or  negative  in  form,  shall  be  entitled  to  judicial 
review  thereof,  as  is  provided  in  this  section,  unless  some 
other  provision  for  judicial  review  is  provided  by  statute. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  if  Senate  Bill  No.  90  is  enacted  it 
would  repeal  the  above  provision  of  Section  10  of  the  act  of 
the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  insofar  as  the  determination 
of  the  Board  of  Arbitrators  on  the  question  of  imposing  and 
collecting  death  taxes  is  concerned,  and  would  prohibit  an 
appeal  from  said  board. 

In  other  words,  as  stated  in  Section  5  of  Senate  Bill  No. 
90,  it  is  a  final  determination  from  which  there  is  no  appeal. 
I  believe  this  would  also  conflict  with  Section  22,  Article  V 
of  the  Missouri  1945  Constitution,  which  is  as  follows: 

"All  final  decisions,  findings,  rules  and  orders  of  any  ad- 
ministrative officer  or  body  existing  under  the  Constitu- 
tion or  by  law,  which  are  judicial  or  quasi-judicial  and 
affect  private  rights,  shall  be  subject  to  direct  review  by 
the  courts  as  provided  by  law;  and  such  review  shall  in- 
clude the  determination  whether  the  same  are  authorized 
by  law,  and  in  cases  in  which  a  hearing  is  required  by  law, 
whether  the  same  are  supported  by  competent  and  sub- 
stantial evidence  upon  the  whole  record." 

I  understand  there  are  some  states  which  have  laws  simi- 
lar to  Senate  Bill  No.  90,  but  I  am  opposed  to  investing  abso- 
lute power  and  final  determination  in  an  administrative  board, 
bureau,  or  commission  from  which  there  is  no  appeal.  I  be- 
lieve that  all  decisions  of  an  administrative  board  or  commis- 
sion should  be  subject  to  review  as  is  provided  in  Section  22  of 
Article  V  of  the  Missouri  Constitution.  I  am  of  the  opinion 
that  our  present  inheritance  tax  laws  are  adequate  for  the 
determination  of  the  question  involved  in  Senate  Bill  No.  90, 


302  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

especially  as  there  is  a  right  of  appeal  to  the  courts  in  such 
cases. 

For  the  above  reasons  Senate  Bill  No.  90  is  vetoed  and 
not  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 
OF  STATE 
MAY  28, 1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATES  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

May  28, 1948. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  420,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  workmen's  compensation  benefits  for 
certain  members  of  the  State  Highway  Patrol  and  for 
certain  employees  of  the  Highway  Commission  who  suf- 
fered injury  or  death  arising  out  of  and  in  the  course  of 
their  employment  at  any  time  between  February  27, 
1945,  and  December  19,  1945." 

Senate  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  420  provides  work- 
men's compensation  benefits  for  certain  members  of  the  State 
Highway  Patrol  and  for  certain  employees  of  the  State  High- 
way Commission  who  suffered  injury  or  death  arising  out  of 
and  in  the  course  of  their  employment  at  any  time  between 
February  27,  1945,  and  December  19,  1945. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  303 

The  new  Missouri  Constitution  was  adopted  February 
27,  1945.  Said  Constitution  was  proclaimed  by  the  Governor 
to  be  in  full  force  and  effect  on  and  after  the  30th  day  of 
March,  1945.  (See  Proclamation  on  file  with  Secretary  of 
State.) 

Section  30,  Article  IV  of  the  1945  Constitution,  provides 
for  workmen's  compensation  as  a  proper  charge  against  high- 
way funds. 

The  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  in  1945  enacted  an  act 
authorizing  the  State  Highway  Commission  to  accept  the  pro- 
visions of  the  workmen's  compensation  act  relating  to  injury 
or  death  of  certain  employees.  This  act  carried  an  emergency 
clause  and  was  approved  by  the  Governor  May  24,  1945. 
(Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  pages  2004  and  2005.) 

Section  8752a  of  said  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General 
Assembly  contains  the  following  provision: 

"The  state  highway  commission  shall  have  authority 
by  resolution  to  elect,  under  the  provisions  of  Section 
3694,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  to  accept  the 
provisions  of  Chapter  29,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  (workmen's  compensation  act)  and  to  pay  compen- 
sation to  its  employees  primarily  engaged  in  maintenance 
and  construction  work  and  to  the  uniformed  members  of 
the  state  highway  patrol,  for  injury  or  death  arising  out 
of  and  in  the  course  of  their  employment  in  accordance 
with  the  provisions  and  restrictions  as  set  forth  in  said 
Chapter  29,  .  .  ." 

The  records  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  show  that 
the  Highway  Commission,  by  the  adoption  of  a  resolution, 
placed  all  such  members  and  employees  under  the  provisions 
of  the  workmen's  compensation  act  and  that  the  same  should 
become  effective  when  a  contract  of  workmen's  compensation 
insurance  should  be  concluded;  said  contract  of  insurance  was 
concluded  and  became  effective  on  December  19,  1945,  Said 
resolution  and  order  of  the  Highway  Commission  was  not 
retroactive. 

The  purpose  of  Senate  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  420 
is  to  bring  under  the  workmen's  compensation  act 


304  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"Every  person  who  was  a  uniformed  member  of  the 
State  Highway  Patrol  between  the  27th  day  of  February, 
1945,  and  the  19th  day  of  December,  1945,  and  every 
employee  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  who  was  pri- 
marily engaged  in  maintenance  or  construction  work  dur- 
ing the  period  inclusive  of  said  dates  who  suffered  personal 
injury  arising  out  of  and  in  the  course  of  his  employment 
at  any  time  within  such  dates  under  such  circumstances 
as  would  have  entitled  him  to  benefits  under  the  Work- 
men's Compensation  Law,  Chapter  29,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945, 
p.  2004,  if  he  and  his  employer  had  been  in  all  respects 
subject  to  the  provisions  of  the  Workmen's  Compensation 
law  during  such  time,  and  who,  because  of  such  injury 
was  still  suffering  disability  as  the  result  of  such  accident 
on  December  19,  1945,  shall  be  entitled  to  receive,  from 
"  funds  appropriated  for  the  support  and  maintenance  of 
the  department  by  which  he  was  employed,  such  benefits 
as  may  be  awarded  to  him  by  the  State  Industrial  Com- 
mission under  the  provisions  of  the  Workmen's  Compen- 
sation Law.  .  .  ."  (Section  1,  Underscoring  mine.) 

Prior  to  the  1945  Missouri  Constitution,  there  was  no 
constitutional  or  statutory  law  authorizing  the  State  High- 
way Commission  to  pay  benefits  to  employees  under  the  work- 
men's compensation  act.  The  Constitution  was  adopted  OA 
February  27,  1945,  by  a  vote  of  the  people  but  did  not  become 
effective  until  March  30,  1945.  The  act  of  the  General  Assem- 
bly extending  the  provisions  of  the  workmen's  compensation 
act  to  include  employees  of  the  State  Highway  Commission 
and  the  State  Highway  Patrol  did  not  become  effective  until 
May  24,  1945.  In  other  words,  there  was  no  constitutional 
authority  to  pay  compensation  claims  to  employees  of  the 
Highway  Department  or  the  State  Highway  Patrol  on  Feb- 
ruary 27,  1945,  the  date  specified  in  Senate  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  420.  In  fact,  there  was  no  authority  to  pay 
such  claims  prior  to  December  19,  1945,  the  date  that  the 
contract  of  workmen's  compensation  insurance  was  concluded 
and  became  effective  under  the  provisions  of  the  resolution 
adopted  by  the  State  Highway  Commission. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  305 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Senate  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
420  is  unconstitutional  because  it  makes  an  obligation  begin 
at  an  earlier  date  than  the  date  the  law  went  into  effect  and 
is  therefore  retroactive  in  operation  and  unconstitutional. 
Section  13,  Article  I,  of  the  1945  Constitution  provides: 

"That  no  ex  post  facto  law,  nor  law  impairing  the 
obligation  of  contracts,  or  retrospective  in  its  operation, 
or  making  any  irrevocable  grant  of  special  privileges  or 
immunities,  can  be  enacted." 

For  the  reasons  herein  above  set  forth,  it  is  my  opinion 
that  this  bill  is  unconstitutional  and  void  and  therefore  vetoed 
and  not  approved- 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JUNE  1,  1948 

From  the  Joivmcd  of  the  Senate,  pp.  21&6-21&7 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  1,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  296,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  3  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly,  relating  to  the  compilation,  indexing  and  pub- 
lication of  the  rules  and  regulations  of  administrative 
agencies  of  the  State  and  to  the  disposal  thereof,  approved 
March  20,  1946,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page 
1504,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section  relating 
to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Section  3." 


306  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Senate  Bill  No.  296  requires  the  Secretary  of  State  to 
compile,  number,  and  index  all  rules  filed  in  his  office  by  all 
agencies  of  the  State,  and  cause  the  same  to  be  published  in 
loose  leaf  binder  form,  in  one  or  more  volumes,  appropriately 
entitled  as  the  official  compilation  of  such  rules.  Each  agency 
shall  cause  to  be  printed  five  thousand  copies  of  the  rules  filed 
by  it  in  the  office  of  the  Secretary  of  State  and  furnish  such 
copies  to  the  Secretary  of  State  for  incorporation  in  the  official 
compilation  required  by  said  act.  Additional  copies  and 
amendments  shall  from  time  to  time  be  printed  and  furnished 
to  the  Secretary  of  State  by  each  agency.  The  Secretary  of 
State  shall  compare  the  proofs  with  the  copies  of  the  rules  on 
file  in  his  office  and  shall  cause  them  to  truly  conform  to  such 
copies. 

The  costs  of  printing  all  rules  and  amendments  shall  be 
paid  from  the  appropriation  of  each  such  agency  adopting 
such  rules. 

The  costs  of  compiling,  comparing,  indexing,  printing  the 
index,  and  binding  such  rules  and  amendments  by  the  Secre- 
tary of  State  and  the  costs  of  similar  work  on  future  compila- 
tion shall  be  paid  from  funds  appropriated  to  the  Secretary  of 
State  for  that  purpose. 

This  bill  includes  every  administrative  agency  of  the  State 
that  has  any  cause  at  any  time  to  promulgate  any  rules  and 
regulations  of  its  functions  and  procedures.  Also,  each  agency 
shall  print  five  thousand  copies  of  all  rules  filed  by  it. 

The  compiling,  numbering,  and  indexing  of  each  rule  and 
regulation  would  require  a  great  amount  of  clerical  work  and 
supervision.  Considering  the  number  of  agencies  included  in 
the  scope  of  the  bill  multiplied  by  the  number  of  rules  of  each 
agency  and  these  multiplied  by  5000,  together  with  keeping 
the  whole  system  up  to  date  would  appear  to  be  prohibitive. 
The  cost  of  printing  could  be  staggering  and  the  storage  space 
required  would  be  far  more  than  could  be  provided  in  the  office 
of  the  Secretary  of  State.  There  has  been  no  appropriation 
to  the  Secretary  of  State  to  meet  the  cost  of  this  bill. 

The  present  law,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page 
1505,  Section  3,  provides: 

"(a)    For  the  state  agencies  there  shall  be  a  monthly 
bulletin  in  which  it  shall  set  forth  the  text  of  all  rules 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  307 

filed  during  the  preceding  month,  excluding  rules  now  in 
effect. 

"(b)  The  proper  state  officer  shall,  as  soon  as  possi- 
ble after  the  effective  date  of  this  act,  compile,  index, 
and  publish  all  rules  adopted  by  each  agency  and  remain- 
ing in  effect.  Compilations  shall  be  supplemented  or  re- 
vised as  often  as  necessary,  and  at  least  once  every  two 
years. 

"(c)  Bulletins  and  compilations  shall  be  made  avail- 
able upon  request  to  state  and  local  officials  free  of  charge, 
and  to  other  persons  at  a  price  fixed  by  the  proper  state 
authority  to  cover  publication  and  mailing  costs.  The 
costs  of  such  printing  and  publication  shall  be  paid  out 
of  the  funds  for  the  operation  of  the  agency  filing  such 
rules." 

I  believe  the  present  law  and  the  present  practices  of  the 
various  State  agencies  are  adequate  in  regard  to  filing  and 
furnishing  copies  of  their  rules  and  regulations.  However,  if 
changes  are  to  be  made  in  the  present  law  I  believe  they 
should  be  less  expensive  and  less  cumbersome  than  provided 
for  in  this  bill. 

In  Subsection  4,  page  4,  lines  83  and  84,  said  bill  provides: 
"and  all  such  printed  rules  so  distributed  shall  be  admissible 
in  proper  cases  in  all  courts  of  record  in  this  state/' 

The  rule  of  evidence  is  that  if  regulations  of  an  agency 
are  to  be  introduced  in  evidence  they  must  be  pleaded  and  then 
properly  introduced  in  evidence.  Courts  do  not  take  judicial 
notice  of  administrative  regulations.  It  is  still  the  preroga- 
tive of  the  court  to  determine  the  competency  and  materiality 
of  any  such  regulation  sought  to  be  introduced.  I  do  not  be- 
lieve that  part  of  the  sentence  above  referred  to  would  change 
that  rule  of  evidence  but  it  might  be  construed  by  some  courts 
as  a  mandate  to  admit  regulations  when  offered  in  evidence. 
In  other  words,  it  seems  to  be  an  attempt  to  change  the  estab- 
lished rules  of  evidence. 

For  the  reasons  herein  given  said  bill  is  vetoed  and  not 
approved.  Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


308  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JUNE  2,  1948 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  2129-2131 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  -JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  2,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:  I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  Senate  Bill  No.  348,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  13  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  appearing  at  page  949  of  the  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1945,  approved  by  the  governor  May  3,  1946,  relating  to 
the  creation  and  establishment  of  a  department  of  public 
health  and  welfare  and  to  enact  a  new  section,  to  be 
known  as  Section  13,  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter 
and  to  the  authority  of  the  director  of  the  division  of 
health  and  of  the  director  of  the  department  of  public 
health  and  welfare  over  the  State  Cancer  Commission." 

Section  12,  Article  IV  of  the  1945  Constitution  authorizes 
the  Governor  to  assign  all  boards,  bureaus,  commissions,  and 
other  agencies  of  the  State  exercising  administrative  or  execu- 
tive authority  to  the  department  to  which  their  respective 
powers  and  duties  are  germane. 

Acting  under  the  above  authority  the  Governor  assigned 
the  Cancer  Commission  to  the  Department  of  Public  Health 
and  Welfare,  effective  July  1,  1946. 

The  General  Assembly  also  undertook  to  assign  the  Cancer 
Commission  to  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare. 
(See  Section  13,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  949.) 

However,  said  act  of  the  General  Assembly  contained  no 
provision  in  regard  to  the  administration  of  the  Cancer  Hos- 
pital. This  made  the  law  ambiguous  as  to  whether  the  Di- 
rector of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  had 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  309 

control  of  the  Cancer  Hospital  or  whether  the  Cancer  Com- 
mission had  control.  During  the  1947  session  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly,  Senator  Keating  introduced  a  bill 
in  the  Senate,  known  as  Senate  Bill  No.  259,  to  clarify  this 
ambiguity  in  the  law.  This  bill  never  was  reported  by  the 
committee. 

During  the  1947  session  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  As- 
sembly, Senator  Allison  introduced  a  bill  in  the  Senate  known 
as  Senate  Bill  No.  195,  providing  in  substance  that  the  em- 
ployees of  the  Cancer  Hospital  should  be  employed  on  the  basis 
of  merit,  as  provided  by  law.  This  bill  passed  the  Senate  but 
was  defeated  in  committee  in  the  House.  This  bill  was  vigor- 
ously opposed  by  those  who  were  opposed  to  the  merit  system 
for  the  Cancer  Hospital  and  also  by  those  opposed  to  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  having  anything 
to  do  with  the  Cancer  Hospital. 

While  these  bills  were  pending  in  the  General  Assembly 
the  Attorney  General  rendered  an  opinion  that  the  final 
administrative  authority  of  the  State  Cancer  Hospital  is  in 
the  Director  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare 
and  the  immediate  supervision  of  the  Cancer  Commission  is 
in  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Health  within  that 
Department. 

After  the  rendition  of  this  opinion  by  the  Attorney  Gen- 
eral and  the  defeat  of  Senate  Bill  No.  195  by  the  House  com- 
mittee, a  very  interesting  development  occurred. 

Senate  Bill  No.  348  was  introduced  on  March  24,  1948. 
It  provided  among  other  things  the  following  (lines  22  to  30, 
inclusive) : 

"The  cancer  commission  of  the  State  of  Missouri,  as 
established  by  Chapter  125,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  as  amended,  is  hereby  assigned  to  the  division 
of  health  in  the  department  of  public  health  and  welfare. 
The  director  of  the  division  of  health  and  the  director  of 
the  department  of  public  health  and  welfare  shall  have 
no  supervision,  authority  or  control  over  such  actions  or 
decisions  of  the  State  Cancer  Commission  as  relates  to 
its  duties  prescribed  by  law." 

In  other  words,  the  merit  system  for  the  employees  at 
the  Cancer  Hospital  was  wiped  out  and  the  entire  supervision. 


310  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

authority,  and  control  of  the  Cancer  Hospital  was  vested  in 
the  Cancer  Commission.  The  assignment  in  lines  22  to  25, 
inclusive,  Section  13,  Senate  Bill  No.  348,  of  the  Cancer  Com- 
mission to  the  Division  of  Health  in  the  Department  of  Public 
Health  and  Welfare  was  merely  a  paper  assignment  and  the 
following  lines  (26  to  30,  inclusive)  "The  director  of  the  divi- 
sion of  health  and  the  director  of  the  department  of  public 
health  and  welfare  shall  have  no  supervision,  authority  or 
control  over  such  actions  or  decisions  of  the  State  Cancer 
Commission  as  relates  to  its  duties  prescribed  by  law.", 
stripped  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Health  and  the  Di- 
rector of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  of 
any  supervision,  authority,  or  control  over  the  Cancer  Com- 
mission as  relates  to  its  duties  prescribed  by  law. 

This  purported  assignment  by  the  General  Assembly  is  in 
direct  violation  of  Section  12,  Article  IV  of  the  1945  Constitu- 
tion, which  gave  the  Governor  and  not  the  General  Assembly 
the  authority  to  make  such  assignments.  Senate  Bill  No.  348 
passed  the  Senate  on  March  30,  1948.  Although  the  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  was  concerned  with  this 
subject  matter,  neither  the  Director  nor  anyone  from  the  De- 
partment of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  was  requested  to  be 
heard  by  the  committee  to  which  the  bill  had  been  referred. 
On  March  30,  1948,  the  same  day  the  bill  passed  in  the  Senate, 
it  was  read  in  the  House.  On  the  next  day,  March  31,  1948, 
it  was  read  the  second  time  and  according  to  the  record  was 
reported  out  of  the  committee  "Do  pass"  before  it  was  referred 
to  the  committee.  However,  later  the  record  was  corrected 
to  show  that  this  bill  had  been  referred  to  the  committee  and 
then  recommended  "Do  pass."  If  a  hearing  was  held  on  the 
bill  no  one  from  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare 
was  requested  to  be  present  or  in  fact  knew  anything  about 
the  bill  being  introduced.  On  April  1,  1948,  the  bill  was  read 
the  third  time  and  passed  the  House.  In  other  words,  it  was 
in  the  House,  according  to  the  record,  three  days  but  actually 
the  first  day  in  the  House  was  the  day  it  passed  in  the  Senate 
(March  30).  This  is  considerable  speed  considering  the  fact 
that  Senator  Keating's  bill  (Senate  Bill  No.  259)  never  was 
reported  by  the  committee  and  Senator  Allison's  bill  (Senate 
Bill  No.  195),  although  passed  by  the  Senate,  was  defeated  in 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  311 

the  House  committee,  and  these  two  bills  were  seeking  to  cor- 
rect the  ambiguity  in  the  law. 

If  we  are  to  have  the  employees  in  the  State  hospitals 
selected  on  the  basis  of  merit  then,  in  my  opinion,  the  em- 
ployees in  the  Cancer  Hospital  should  be  selected  on  the  basis 
of  merit  the  same  as  those  in  the  other  State  hospitals.  The 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  operates  the  other 
State  hospitals  and  successfully  operates  the  Missouri  State 
Sanatorium  at  Mount  Vernon  and  the  Trachoma  Hospital  at 
Rolla,  both  of  which  institutions  deal  with  specialized  forms 
of  treatment  and  surgery.  The  doctors  in  these  institutions 
are  as  highly  skilled  in  their  particular  field  as  are  the  doctors 
in  the  Cancer  Hospital. 

In  my  opinion  the  Cancer  Hospital  should  be  under  the 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare  as  is  contemplated 
by  the  Constitution  and  the  Cancer  Commission  should  serve 
in  atx  advisory  capacity.  Legislation  should  be  enacted  to  do 
this  and  clarify  the  ambiguity  in  the  present  law. 

For  the  reasons  herein  stated  Senate  Bill  No.  348  is 
vetoed  and  not  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JUNE  2,  1948 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2165-2168 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  2,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith,  with  my  veto  and  without  my 
approval,  House  Bill  No,  465,  entitled: 


312  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  9434  of  Article  2,  Chapter  52  of 
the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by 
an  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  approved  June  20, 
1941,  and  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  566,  by 
inserting  in  line  77  after  the  word  'expenditures/  the 
following:  'except  that  appropriations  from  said  fund  may 
be  made  for  the  purpose  of  acquiring  lands  and  buildings, 
or  for  the  erection  of  buildings  on  lands  so  acquired,  which 
are  deenjed  necessary  for  the  administration  of  this  law/, 
and  to  further  amend  said  section  9434  by  inserting  a 
new  paragraph  at  the  end  of  subsection  (c)  between  lines 
98  and  99  thereof  providing  for  the  acquisition  of  lands 
and  buildings  for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employment 
Security  from  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  and 
for  the  repayment  to  said  Special  Employment  Security 
Fund  of  the  amounts  expended  for  such  purpose." 

There  are  two  parts  of  Section  9434,  Article  2,  Chapter 
52,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an  act 
of  the  Sixty-first  General  Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1941,  page  566,  which  are  sought  to  be  amended  by 
House  Bill  No.  465. 

The  first  amendment  is  set  out  in  full  in  the  title  and  also 
in  the  enacting  clause  and  Section  9434.  The  second  amend- 
ment mentioned  in  the  title  is  the  one  that  I  desire  to  discuss. 
It  is  found  on  page  1,  lines  10  to  17,  inclusive,  of  the  title  and 
reads  as  follows: 

".  .  .  and  to  further  amend  said  section  9434  by  insert- 
ing a  new  paragraph  at  the  end  of  subsection  (c)  between 
lines  98  and  99  thereof  providing  for  the  acquisition  of 
lands  and  buildings  for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employ- 
ment Security  from  the  Special  Employment  Security 
Fund  and  for  the  repayment  to  said  Special  Employment 
Security  Fund  of  the  amounts  expended  for  such  purpose/' 

The  actual  amendment  referred  to  in  the  title  is  set  out 
in  full  on  pages  2  and  3,  lines  13  to  56,  inclusive. 

This  amendment  to  Section  9434  appears  on  pages  6  and 
7,  lines  106  to  142,  inclusive,  but  with  a  certain  omission.  The 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  313 

following  words  appearing  on  page  3,  of  Section  1,  lines  49  to 
56,  inclusive,  are  omitted,  to  wit: 

".  .  .  until  the  full  amount  of  the  purchase  price  there- 
of and  the  costs  of  construction  and  the  costs  of  repair 
and  maintenance  thereof  have  been  returned  to  such  fund. 
After  the  amount  of  the  purchase  price  has  been  repaid 
into  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  the  costs  of 
repair  and  maintenance  of  any  said  building  shall  be  paid 
from  the  Unemployment  Compensation  Administration 
Fund." 

The  above  words  should  have  been  inserted  on  page  7, 
line  142,  after  the  word  "it." 

The  title  of  House  Bill  No.  465  in  regard  to  the  above 
mentioned  amendment  indicates  four  distinct  items  of  leg- 
islation : 

1.  The  acquisition  of  lands  and  buildings; 

2.  The  use  of  the  lands  and  buildings  so  acquired  by  the 
Division  of  Employment  Security; 

3.  The  payment  for  the  lands  and  buildings  so  acquired 
from  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund;  and 

4.  The  repayment  of  the  funds  expended  to  said  Special 
Employment  Security  Fund. 

On  pages  6  and  7,  lines  106  to  142,  the  Division  of  Employ- 
ment Security  has  the  right  of  primary  utilization  of  any  build- 
ings or  lands  acquired  but  "any  space  in  excess  of  the  require- 
ments of  said  division  may  be  allocated  to  other  agencies  of 
the  state  under  agreements  with  the  State  Board  of  Public 
Buildings."  (Page  7,  lines  120  to  122.)  In  other  words,  while 
the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  465  provides  for  the  acquisition  of 
lands  and  buildings  for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employment 
Security,  it  nowhere  states  that  such  lands  and  buildings  ac- 
quired pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  this  amendment  may  be 
rented  or  made  available  to  other  State  agencies. 

Furthermore,  the  State  Board  of  Public  Buildings  is 
authorized  to  make  agreements  with  other  agencies  of  the 
State  concerning  space  in  buildings  so  acquired  in  excess  of 
the  needs  of  the  Division  of  Employment  Security.  This 


314  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

authority  of  the  State  Board  of  Public  Buildings  is  not  author- 
ized in  the  title  of  said  bill. 

It  is  further  provided  (lines  123  to  129,  inclusive)  that  all 
agreements  with  other  State  agencies  for  the  use  of  the  excess 
space  in  buildings  and  lands  acquired  for  the  use  of  the  Divi- 
sion of  Employment  Security  shall  provide  for  the  payment 
from  funds  appropriated  for  the  support  of  such  agencies,  of 
amounts  equivalent  to  the  reasonable,  fair  rental  value  of  the 
space  utilized,  into  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund, 
until  such  time  as  the  full  amount  of  the  purchase  price  of 
such  lands  and  buildings,  and  cost  of  repair  and  maintenance 
thereof,  have  been  returned  to  such  fund. 

There  is  no  indication  in  the  title  that  the  repayment  of 
the  funds  expended  for  the  acquisition  of  lands  and  buildings 
for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employment  Security  shall  be 
paid  back  into  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  from 
the  fair  rental  value  obtained  from  State  agencies  utilizing 
any  excess  space  in  said  buildings  or  lands.  Furthermore, 
Section  9434,  pages  6  and  7,  nowhere  makes  any  provision 
that  the  Division  of  Employment  Security,  for  whose  use  the 
lands  and  buildings  were  primarily  acquired,  shall  make  pay- 
ments into  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  until  full 
repayment  of  the  purchase  price  has  been  made.  The  only 
requirement  of  the  Division  of  Employment  Security  is  that 
said  division  shall  transfer  from  funds  appropriated  for  its 
support  from  the  Unemployment  Compensation  Administra- 
tion Fund,  to  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund,  amounts 
equivalent  to  the  fair,  reasonable  rental  value  of  the  lands  and 
buildings  so  acquired.  (Lines  132  to  137,  inclusive.)  In  other 
words,  the  burden  of  repayment  mentioned  in  the  title  is  not 
cast  upon  the  Division  of  Employment  Security  as  the  title 
would  indicate,  but  is  cast  upon  State  agencies  to  whom  the 
excess  space  may  be  rented.  There  is  no  requirement  in  Sec- 
tion 9434,  as  amended,  that  the  Division  of  Employment 
Security  shall  repay  the  funds  expended  from  the  Special  Em- 
ployment Security  Fund,  but  only  the  requirement  that  the 
Division  of  Employment  Security  pay  rental  value  for  an  unde- 
termined time.  This  lack  of  provision  for  the  repayment  to 
the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  by  the  Division  of 


GOVEKNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  315 

Employment  Security  is  made  more  noticeable  by  referring  to 
page  3,  Section  1,  lines  49  to  52,  wherein  it  is  stated: 

".  .  .  until  the  full  amount  of  the  purchase  price  there- 
of and  the  costs  of  construction  and  the  costs  of  repair 
and  maintenance  thereof  have  been  returned  to  such 
fund.  .  .  ." 

The  above  quoted  portion  of  Section  1,  on  page  3,  lines 
49  to  52,  inclusive,  is  a  part  of  that  portion  of  the  amendment 
that  was  omitted  on  page  7.  In  other  words,  the  above  quoted 
portion  should  have  followed  immediately  after  the  word  "it," 
in  line  142  on  page  7.  It  is  the  only  provision  that  places 
upon  the  Division  of  Employment  Security  the  burden  of  pay- 
ing the  fair,  reasonable  rental  value  until  the  full  amount  of 
the  purchase  price  has  been  returned  to  the  Special  Employ- 
ment Security  Fund. 

I  do  not  believe  that  the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  465,  in 
regard  to  the  above  mentioned  amendment,  is  a  fair  index  of 
the  legislation  contained  in  said  section.  The  variance  be- 
tween the  title  and  the  section  as  amended,  together  with  the 
omission  in  said  section  on  page  7,  are  of  sufficient  importance 
to  render  the  title  defective  as  not  being  a  fair  guide  or  an 
accurate  indication  of  the  legislation  enacted. 

There  is  also  another  consideration  to  be  made  of  House 
Bill  No.  465.  In  the  title,  lines  15,  16,  and  17,  provision  is 
made  for  repayment  of  the  funds  expended  from  the  Special 
Employment  Security  Fund  for  the  acquisition  of  lands  and 
buildings  for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employment  Security. 
On  page  3,  lines  49  to  56,  inclusive,  there  is  found  a  provision 
which  specifically  provides  for  the  repayment  of  the  funds  ex- 
pended from  the  Special  Employment  Security  Fund  by  the 
Division  of  Employment  Security  for  the  acquisition  of  lands 
and  buildings  for  the  use  of  the  Division  of  Employment 
Security.  However,  this  is  another  part  of  the  provision  that 
is  omitted  on  page  7  and  which  should  have  followed  that 
part  of  the  amendment  immediately  following  the  word  "it" 
in  line  142. 

By  failing  to  insert  on  page  7,  line  142,  after  the  word 
"it,"  the  words  set  forth  on  page  3,  lines  49  to  56,  inclusive, 
said  amendment  in  Section  9434  was  in  direct  violation  of 


316  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Section  28,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution,  which  provides 
in  substance  that  the  act  or  section  amended  shall  be  set  forth 
in  full  as  amended.  The  original  House  Bill  No.  465  in  the 
office  of  the  Chief  Clerk  of  the  House,  shows  that  several  lines 
were  stricken  out  of  Section  9434. 

Because  of  the  omission  of  a  part  of  the  above  amend- 
ment and  because  of  the  defects  in  the  title,  as  above  set  forth, 
House  Bill  No.  465  is  vetoed  and  not  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


VETO  RECORDED  WITH  THE  SECRETARY 

OF  STATE 

JUNE  3,  1948 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2169-21T6 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JJBFFERSON  CITY, 
June  3,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  484,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  for  the  support  of  the  State 
Government,  for  payment  of  certain  contingent  and  inci- 
dental expenses  of  the  State  Government,  for  the  period 
beginning  July  1,  1948,  and  ending  June  30,  1949;  and  to 
appropriate  money  for  the  various  forms  of  relief;  for  the 
several  departments  of  the  State  Government,  for  free 
public  schools,  the  several  boards,  bureaus  and  commis- 
sions and  state  offices  and  persons,  firms  and  corporations 
for  the  payment  of  which  the  state  may  be  liable,  and 
appropriating  funds  for  other  purposes,  for  the  fiscal  years 
1947-48  and  1948-49,  and  prior  years." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  317 

and  append  to  said  bill,  at  the  time  of  signing  it,  the  following 
statement  of  items,  or  portions  of  items,  to  which  I  object, 
which  items  and  portions  of  items  are  returned  without  my 
approval,  for  the  reasons  herein  below  stated  which  said  rea- 
sons accompany  said  bill  and  are  my  objections  to  said  items 
and  portions  of  items. 

I. 

I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  item  of  $8,869.50  in  Sec- 
tion 9.150  for  the  relief  of  the  Carter  Motor  Company,  Union- 
ville,  Missouri,  for  hauling  gravel  under  sub-contract,  which  it 
is  alleged  was  not  paid  by  the  State  Highway  Department. 

There  is  no  date  mentioned  in  regard  to  this  claim  in 
Section  9.150.  However,  this  claim  has  been  around  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  for  a  number  of  years.  It  was  vetoed  by  Gov- 
ernor Stark  in  1937  (see  Laws  of  Missouri,  1937,  page  170) 
for  the  reason  there  is  no  legal  liability  on  the  part  of  the 
State.  At  that  time  the  claim  was  for  $5,436.53.  It  is  my 
recollection  that  it  was  vetoed  by  another  Governor  but  I  am 
unable  to  locate  the  specific  message  at  this  time. 

The  subcontractor,  Carter  Motor  Company  of  Union- 
ville,  entered  into  a  contract  with  the  Miller  Garage  and  Con- 
tracting Company  to  haul  gravel  for  three  projects  in  Putnam 
County,  Missouri.  This  was  in  the  year  1928.  The  original 
contract  for  the  hauling  of  gravel  for  these  projects  was  made 
between  the  State  Highway  Department  and  the  contractor 
and  was  not  made  with  the  subcontractor.  The  contractor 
furnished  performance  and  payment  bond  with  a  surety,  The 
Southern  Surety  Company,  licensed  in  Missouri  and  approved 
by  the  State  Insurance  Department.  When  the  work  was 
completed  the  contractor  owed  the  subcontractor  $4,298.78. 
Both  the  contractor  and  the  surety  became  bankrupt  and  the 
claim  was  not  paid.  In  July,  1932,  the  subcontractor,  Carter 
Motor  Company,  obtained  a  judgment  in  the  Circuit  Court 
of  Putnam  County,  Missouri,  against  the  contractor  for  said 
sum  of  $4,298.78,  This  judgment  was  never  paid.  The  sub- 
contractor, Carter  Motor  Company,  by  obtaining  said  judg- 
ment recognized  there  was  no  legal  liability  upon  the  State 
Highway  Department. 


318  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

The  claim  in  Section  9.150  of  House  Bill  No.  484  is  for 
$8,869.50,  which  evidently  represents  interest  for  sixteen  years. 
In  Section  9.150,  lines  5,  6,  and  7,  it  is  stated: 

"for  hauling  gravel  under  subcontract,  which  was  not  paid 
by  the  said  Highway  Department." 

The  Highway  Department  paid  the  original  contractor.  There 
was  no  legal  liability  on  the  part  of  the  State  Highway  Depart- 
ment to  pay  the  subcontractor. 

For  the  reasons  herein  set  forth,  this  claim  is  vetoed  and 
not  approved. 

II. 

I  hereby  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  following  appro- 
priation: 

Section  9.290,  lines  13  and  14,  "For  the  construction  and 
equipment  of  a  classroom  building,  $500,000.00"  to  the  Uni- 
versity of  Missouri. 

However,  I  approve  the  following  item  in  said  Section 
9.290,  lines  10  to  12,  inclusive:  "For  the  construction  and 
equipment  of  agricultural  buildings,  including  meat  and  other 
farm  laboratory  buildings,  $825,000.00." 

III. 

Sections  9.300,  9.310,  9.320,  9.330  and  9.340. 

In  Section  9.300,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  to  Northeast  Missouri  State  Teachers 
College,  Kirksville,  for  an  auditorium  in  the  sum  of  $675,000.00. 

In  Section  9.310,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  to  Northwest  Missouri  State  Teachers 
College,  Maryville,  for  an  instructional  building  in  the  sum  of 
$800,000.00. 

In  Section  9.320,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  to  Central  State  College,  Warrensburg, 
for  a  science  and  applied  arts  building  in  the  sum  of  $845,- 
420.00. 

In  Section  9.330,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  this  section  to  Southeast  Missouri  State  College, 
Cape  Girardeau,  for  a  science  building  in  the  sum  of 
$740,000.00. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  319 

In  Section  9.340,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in, this  section  to  Southwest  Missouri  State  College, 
Springfield,  for  a  library  building  in  the  sum  of  $900,000.00* 

IV. 

In  Section  9.350,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  lines  10  to  13,  inclusive,  as  follows:  "For  the  pu,r- 
pose  of  purchasing  the  necessary  land  and  for  the  construction 
and  equipping  thereon  of  a  law  building  in  the  City  of  St. 
Louis,  $400,000.00,"  this  appropriation  being  to  Lincoln  Uni- 
versity. It  is  my  opinion  that  if  a  building  for  a  law  school 
for  Lincoln  University  is  constructed  it  should  be  in  Jefferson 
City,  Missouri,  where  Lincoln  University  is  located  and  not  in 
some  other  city  in  the  State. 

In  Section  9.350,  I  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  appro- 
priation in  lines  14  to  16,  inclusive,  as  follows:  'Tor  the  pur- 
pose of  constructing  and  equipping  a  new  physical  health  and 
gymnasium  building  with  playing  field,  $448,400.00,"  this 
appropriation  being  to  Lincoln  University. 

However,  I  approve  the  following  item  in  Section  9.350, 
lines  8  and  9:  "For  the  construction  and  equipping  of  a  library 
building  at  Jefferson  City,  $440,800.00,"  this  appropriation 
being  to  Lincoln  University. 

All  of  the  above  items,  in  II,  III,  and  IV,  except  the  phys- 
ical health  and  gymnasium  building  with  playing  field,  and 
law  building  in  the  City  of  St.  Louis  in  Section  9.350  for  Lin- 
coln University,  were  included  in  House  Bill  No.  445  of  the 
Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  and  were  vetoed  at  that  timfe 
for  the  reasons  therein  stated.  Some  of  those  same  reasons 
are  applicable  at  the  present  time.  (Laws  of  Missouri,  1947, 
Volume  I,  pages  207  to  209,  inclusive.)  Some  of  said  build- 
ings may  have  been  designated  under  another  name  in  House 
Bill  No.  445  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly. 

The  above  appropriations  in  II,  III,  and  IV  are  charge- 
able to  the  Post  War  Reserve  Fund.  There  is  included  in 
House  Bill  No.  451,  and  also  House  Bills  Nos.  452  and  453; 
certain  buildings  for  the  State,  £I0$pitals,  Tr?iini|ig'§<jkqol% 
and  certain  educational  institutions;  also  an  increase  in  appro- 
priations for  personal  service  and  operation  at  certain  of  these 
institutions.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  balance  in  the  Post 


320  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

War  Fund  would  be  reduced  to  a  small  amount  if  the  above 
appropriations  were  approved,  it  is  my  opinion  that  the  above 
buildings  should  not  be  constructed  at  this  time.  It  may  be 
necessary  to  draw  upon  the  balance  in  the  Post  War  Fund  to 
complete  the  present  building  program  at  the  different  insti- 
tutions and  equip  the  buildings.  I  do  not  believe  it  is  good 
business  management  to  reduce  the  Post  War  Fund  too  low 
at  this  time.  By  not  approving  the  above  appropriations  there 
will  be  approximately  Nine  or  Ten  Million  Dollars  remain- 
ing in  the  Post  War  Fund. 

V. 

I  approve  the  appropriation  in  Section  9.370  for  Two 
Million  Dollars  to  the  Division  of  Public  Buildings  of  the  De- 
partment of  Revenue,  chargeable  to  the  Post  War  Reserve 
Fund,  for  the  purpose  of  constructing  and  equipping  a  State 
office  building  under  the  direction  and  supervision  of  said 
Division  of  Public  Buildings,  as  provided  by  law.  However, 
I  do  not  approve  that  part  of  said  Section  9.370  as  follows 
(Lines  6,  7,  and  8) :  "to  be  located  on  the  state-owned  property 
east  of  the  State  Capitol  Building  on  the  north  side  of  Capitol 
Avenue."  The  Sixty-second  General  Assembly  enacted  legis- 
lation authorizing  the  Board  of  Permanent  Seat  of  Govern- 
ment to  erect  and  construct  or  cause  to  be  erected  and  con- 
structed, a  building  in  Jefferson  City  to  be  known  as  the  State 
Office  Building.  (Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  825.) 

The  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  abolished  the  Board 
of  Permanent  Seat  of  Government  and  by  the  same  act  created 
the  Board  of  Public  Buildings  in  the  Department  of  Revenue, 
Said  act  transferred  the  duties  formerly  vested  in  the  Board 
of  Permanent  Seat  of  Government  to  the  Board  of  Public 
Buildings.  (Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1462.)  Therefore, 
since  the  Board  of  Public  Buildings  is  the  successor  in  office 
to  the  Board  of  Permanent  Seat  of  Government,  said  Board 
of  Public  Buildings  is  the  proper  agency  of  the  State  to  erect 
and  construct  or  cause  to  be  erected  a,nd  constructed  a  build- 
ing in  Jefferson  City  to  be  known  as  a  State  Office  Building 
and  shall  select  plans  and  award  the  contract  for  said  office 
building. 

It  is  well  settled  that  the  General  Assembly  cannot  legis- 
late by  appropriation  acts.  Section  23,  Article  III,  Constitu- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  321 

tion  of  Missouri,  1945,  follows  Section  28,  Article  IV,  Consti- 
tution of  Missouri,  1875,  and  reads: 

"No  bill  shall  contain  more  than  one  subject  which  shall 
be  clearly  expressed  in  its  title,  except  bills  enacted  under 
the  third  exception  in  section  37  of  this  article  and  gen- 
eral appropriation  bills,  which  may  embrace  the  various 
subjects  and  accounts  for  which  moneys  are  appropriated." 

In  the  case  of  State  ex  rel.  vs.  Smith,  75  S.  W.  (2d)  828, 
1.  c.  830,  the  Court  held  that  legislation  of  a  general  character 
cannot  be  included  in  an  appropriation  bill;  to  do  so  would 
violate  Section  28,  Article  IV,  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1875, 
which  is  the  same  as  Section  23,  Article  III,  Constitution  of 
Missouri,  1945. 

In  a  more  recent  case,  State  ex  rel.  vs,  Canada,  113  S.  W. 
(2d)  783,  1.  c.  790,  the  Court  held  to  the  same  effect  that 
"Legislation  of  a  general  character  cannot  be  included  in  an 
appropriation  bill/' 

In  view  of  the  above  constitutional  provision  and  the 
decisions  of  the  Court  construing  said  provision,  it  is  my 
opinion  that  that  part  of  Section  9.370,  House  Bill  No.  484, 
mentioning  the  location  of  the  proposed  State  Office  Building 
is  unconstitutional  in  that  it  is  attempting  to  legislate  in  an 
appropriation  act  and  violates  the  provision  of  Section  23,  Arti- 
cle III  of  the  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1945.  However,  this 
does  not  in  any  manner  affect  the  validity  of  the  remaining 
portion  of  said  section  because  said  remaining  portion  is  a 
complete  workable  statute  and  said  sum  of  Two  Million  Dol- 
lars mentioned  in  said  section  for  the  purpose  of  constructing 
and  equipping  a  State  Office  Building  is  approved, 
\ 

VI. 

Section  9.374  appropriates  out  of  the  State  Treasury, 
chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund,  the  sum  of  Two 
Million  Five  Hundred  Thousand  Dollars,  to  be  used  for  the 
support  of  free  public  schools;  said  sum  to  be  apportioned  and 
distributed  for  the  support  of  free  public  schools,  as  provided 
by  law,  and  to  be  in  addition  to  the  one-third  appropriated 
for  the  same  purpose  in  Section  2.121  of  House  Bill  No.  448 
of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly. 


322  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

When  this  section  was  introduced  in  the  House  as  an 
amendment  to  House  Bill  No.  484  it  was  for  Five  Million 
Dollars  and  was  passed  by  the  House.  The  Senate  struck 
out  this  section.  However,  it  was  reduced  to  Two  and  One- 
Half  Million  Dollars  by  the  conference  committee  report, 
which  report  later  was  adopted. 

This  is  the  first  time  in  the  history  of  the  State  that  an 
appropriation  for  a  specific  sum  has  been  made  by  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  for  the  support  of  the  public  schools,  in  addi- 
tion to  the  regular  appropriation  of  one-third  of  the  General 
Revenue. 

Under  the  provision  of  Section  3(b),  Article  IX,  Consti- 
tution of  Missouri,  1945,  there  is  provided,  among  other  things, 
as  follows: 

".  .  .  but  in  no  case  shall  there  be  set  apart  less  than 
twenty-five  per  cent  of  the  state  revenue,  exclusive  of 
interest  and  sinking  fund,  to  be  applied  annually  to  the 
support  of  the  free  public  schools." 

For  many  years  the  General  Assembly  has  set  apart  one- 
third  of  the  General  Revenue  for  the  support  of  the  free  public 
schools.  The  sum  so  set  apart  has  gradually  increased  each 
year.  In  1933  it  was  $3,397,851.71.  In  1947  it  was  $29,- 
922,639.92.  In  1948  it  is  estimated  it  will  be  $31,454,858.33, 
less  the  amount  appropriated  to  the  School  for  the  Deaf, 
School  for  the  Blind,  and  certain  items  to  the  State  Depart- 
ment of  Education,  State  aid  for  high  school  buildings  in  cer- 
tain school  districts,  teachers  training  work  in  high  schools, 
to  pay  to  each  county  $750.00  to  apply  on  amounts  paid  for 
clerical  assistance  for  county  superintendents  of  schools,  to 
pay  compensation  of  county  supeiintendents  of  schools  and 
supervisors  of  school  transportation,  to  pay  compensation  of 
county  superintendents  of  schools  for  preparation  of  school 
district  budgets,  which  will  be  approximately  $1,609,363.33. 
The  appropriation  for  the  public  schools  has  always  been  on 
a  percentage  basis.  In  Section  9.374  of  House  Bill  No.  484 
for  the  first  time  there  is  in  addition  to  the  setting  apart  of 
one-third  part  of  the  General  Revenue,  an  additional  appro- 
priation of  a  specific  amount  of  $2,500,000.00. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  323 

In  my  opinion  this  appropriation  of  Two  Million  Five 
Hundred  Thousand  Dollars  is  a  dangerous  precedent  in  the 
appropriation  of  funds  from  the  general  revenue. 

In  considering  this  appropriation  it  should  be  borne  in 
mind  that  the  Governor  has  no  authority  to  reduce  any  appro- 
priation for  free  public  schools. 

Section  26,  Article  IV,  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1945, 
provides : 

".  .  .  The  governor  shall  not  reduce  any  appropriation 
for  free  public  schools,  or  for  the  payment  of  principal 
and  interest  on  the  public  debt." 

Under  this  provision  of  the  Constitution  the  Governor  is 
powerless  to  reduce  or  veto  an  appropriation  for  the  public 
schools  and  must  keep  his  hands  off  any  appropriation  for 
public  schools  regardless  of  how  high  the  appropriation  may  be. 

This  raises  a  serious  budgetary  problem  in  view  of  the 
fact  that  if  the  General  Assembly  over-appropriates  the  antici- 
pated revenue  the  Governor  must  balance  the  budget  from 
the  appropriations  to  the  institutions  and  departments  of  the 
State  government  because  he  cannot  touch  the  appropriation 
for  free  public  schools. 

When  the  estimate  of  the  anticipated  revenue  was  made 
for  the  General  Assembly  it  was  anticipated  that  the  net  gen- 
eral revenue  for  1948-49  would  be  $63,242,216.67.  The  appro- 
priations by  the  General  Assembly  for  the  fiscal  year  1948-49 
were  $65,192,282.67.  This  was  an  over-appropriation  of  $1,- 
950,066.00.  This  estimate  was  made  more  than  a  year  ago 
when  the  budget  was  being  prepared  for  the  General  Assembly. 
However,  since  that  time  the  revenues  for  the  present  fiscal 
year  have  been  practically  collected  and  judging  from  the 
present  collections  it  is  the  opinion  of  the  Revenue  Depart- 
ment that  the  estimates  from  all  sources  of  revenue,  except 
income  tax,  appear  to  be  approximately  correct,  but  probably 
there  will  be  an  increase  of  approximately  Three  Million  Dol- 
lars in  receipts  from  the  State  Income  Tax  above  the  amount 
originally  anticipated. 

One-third  or  One  Million  Dollars  of  this  amount  will  have 
to  be  set  aside  for  the  public  schools,  leaving  Two  Million 
Dollars  to  be  added  to  the  anticipated  General  Revenue  of 


324  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

$63,242,216.67.  In  other  words,  this  anticipated  excess  in 
the  State  Income  Tax  will  just  about  take  care  of  the  over- 
appropriation  of  $1,950,066.00. 

It  can  readily  be  seen  that  if  the  additional  appropria- 
tion in  Section  9.374  for  free  public  schools,  as  originally  voted 
by  the  House,  had  remained  at  Five  Million  Dollars,  there 
would  have  been  an  over-appropriation  in  spite  of  the  antici- 
pated increase  in  income  taxes  and  the  Governor  would  have 
been  without  authority  to  reduce  any  part  of  said  appropria- 
tion in  attempting  to  balance  the  budget. 

In  considering  this  question  it  should  be  borne  in  mind 
that  Section  24,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  requires  the 
Governor  to  submit  to  the  General  Assembly  a  budget  for  the 
ensuing  appropriation  period,  containing  the  estimated  avail- 
able revenues  of  the  State  and  a  complete  and  itemized  plan 
of  proposed  expenditures  of  the  State  and  all  its  agencies,  to- 
gether with  his  recommendations  of  any  laws  necessary  to 
provide  revenues  sufficient  to  meet  the  expenditures.  In  other 
words,  the  Governor  is  required  to  submit  a  balanced  budget 
but  he  has  no  control  over  one  of  the  items  which  takes  over 
one-third  of  the  General  Revenue,  and  in  fact  may  take  much 
more  if  the  General  Assembly  follows  the  precedent  set  in 
Section  9.374. 

Later  if  it  develops  that  the  actual  revenue  is  less  than 
the  revenue  estimates  upon  which  the  appropriations  were 
based,  the  Governor  can  reduce  the  expenditures  of  the  State 
or  any  of  its  agencies  below  their  appropriations  (Section  27, 
Article  IV,  Constitution  of  Missouri,  1945).  However,  this 
reduction  in  the  expenditures  of  the  State,  or  any  of  its  agen- 
cies, cannot  be  taken  from  the  appropriation  for  free  public 
schools  because  of  the  prohibition  in  Section  26  of  Article  IV. 

While  we  recognize  the  importance  of  education  in  a 
democracy,  we  also  should  recognize  the  necessity  of  main- 
taining and  supporting  other  functions,  institutions,  and  de- 
partments of  our  State  government. 

The  anticipated  revenue  is  greater  for  the  coming  fiscal 
year  than  ever  before.  The  appropriations  also  are  greater, 
due  to  the  increasing  cost  of  operation  of  the  institutions  and 
departments  of  the  State  government.  If  there  should  be  a 
reduction  in  the  actual  revenue  within  the  near  future  and  if 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  325 

specific  appropriations  are  going  to  be  made  by  the  General 
Assembly  for  the  public  schools,  in  addition  to  the  regular 
one-third  of  the  General  Revenue,  then  it  will  become  a  serious 
problem  to  balance  the  budget.  It  is  my  opinion  that  serious 
thought  should  be  given  to  the  repeal  of  the  above  provision 
of  the  Constitution  prohibiting  the  Governor  from  reducing 
appropriations  for  public  schools,  that  is,  appropriations  in 
excess  of  the  constitutional  limit. 

I  also  suggest  that  serious  consideration  should  be  given 
to  the  expenditure  of  that  part  of  the  General  Revenue  which 
is  appropriated  to  the  public  schools.  Section  10366,  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1943,  page  895,  provides  that  all  State  funds  shall 
be  paid  into  the  Teachers'  Fund  except  as  is  provided  in  said 
section.  I  realize  that  teachers  are  entitled  to  increases  in 
salary;  however,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  this  State  fund  for 
public  schools  has  been  greatly  increased  in  recent  years,  as 
above  set  forth,  the  question  naturally  arises  as  to  whether 
or  not  the  State  funds  are  being  used  for  teachers'  salaries  or 
for  other  purposes. 

VII. 

The  item  of  $746.31  in  Section  9.379,  page  40,  for  the 
relief  of  T.  E.  Bell,  Clerk  of  the  County  Court  of  Iron  County, 
Missouri,  for  preparing  and  extending  the  State's  portion  of 
the  tax  books  of  the  County  of  Wayne  for  the  years  1942, 
1943,  1944,  1945,  and  1946  is  vetoed  and  not  approved.  In 
a  letter  to  me  from  T.  E.  Bell,  Clerk  of  the  County  Court 
of  Iron  County,  Missouri,  dated  May  26,  1948,  Mr.  Bell  states 
that  he  prepared  and  extended  the  tax  books  for  Iron  County 
for  the  above  years.  I  do  not  believe  he  would  be  entitled 
to  be  paid  for  preparing  and  extending  the  State's  portion  of 
the  tax  books  for  Wayne  County,  Missouri.  This,  no  doubt, 
was  an  error  in  preparing  the  amendment,  which  was  offered 
to  House  Bill  No.  484  from  the  floor  on  the  perfection  of  the 
bill.  In  fact,  it  was  suggested  to  a  member  of  the  Senate  that 
the  amendment  was  incorrect  but  no  attention  was  paid  to 
the  suggestion.  For  the  above  reasons  this  item  is  vetoed. 

VIIL 

I  hereby  veto  and  do  not  approve  the  item  in  Section 
9.420,  page  44,  House  Bill  No.  484,  in  the  sum  of  $752,40, 


326  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

chargeable  to  the  State  Highway  Department  Fund  for  the 
purpose  of  paying  a  special  tax  bill  No.  587  issued  on  the  29th 
day  of  July,  1947,  by  the  City  of  Rolla,  Missouri,  against  a 
certain  property  of  the  Missouri  State  Highway  Department 
described  in  said  section,  in  payment  of  the  cost  of  certain 
paving  on  Elm  Street  in  Rolla  abutting  the  property  therein 
described. 

This  tract  of  land  was  acquired  many  years  ago  by  the 
State  of  Missouri  for  a  borrow  pit  for  the  sum  of  1100.00. 
The  State  removed  earth  from  it  for  the  construction  of  Route 
72  in  Phelps  County,  Missouri,  and  after  such  construction 
the  State  abandoned  the  tract.  The  tax  bill  is  for  $752.40. 
In  a  letter  dated  September  18,  1946,  the  City  of  Rolla  sug- 
gested that  the  Highway  Department  convey  title  to  the  City 
of  Rolla  to  this  parcel  of  ground  for  the  consideration  of  $1.00 
or  some  nominal  amount  and  let  the  City  assume  the  cost  of 
the  street  improvement  along  this  property.  The  Highway 
Department  notified  the  City  of  Rolla  that  it  would  convey 
the  tract  to  the  City  for  a  nominal  consideration.  The  negotia- 
tions never  were  completed. 

In  this  particular  instance,  I  do  not  believe  the  payment 
of  $752.40  from  Highway  Funds  is  justified.  The  Highway 
Department  is  willing  to  convey  the  tract  of  land  in  question 
to  the  City  of  Rolla  for  a  nominal  consideration  and  I  believe 
that  a  quit  claim  deed  should  be  executed  by  the  Highway 
Commission  to  the  City  of  Rolla  for  this  tract  of  land  and 
the  tax  bill  cancelled. 

For  the  reasons  herein  set  forth  I  do  not  approve  this 
appropriation. 

On  June  3,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  484  as 
to  all  items  and  portions  of  items  thereof,  except  the  items 
and  portions  of  items  which  are,  as  in  this  message  above 
stated,  returned  without  my  approval 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  327 


SPECIAL  MESSAGES 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUARY  31,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  187 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  31,  1945. 

To   the   Senate   of  the   63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Henry  N.  Byrne,  St.  Joseph,  Buchanan  County,  Missouri, 
as  a  Commissioner  of  the  Department  of  Penal  Institutions, 
for  a  term  of  four  years  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  P.  F.  Willis,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  171 

EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  QTY, 
February  13,  1945, 

To  the   Senate   of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


328  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Hugh  H.  Waggoner,  Lebanon,  Missouri,  as  Superintend- 
ent of  the  Missouri  State  Highway  Patrol  for  a  term  ending 
at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  M.  Stanley  Ginn. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  14,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  182 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  14,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

E.  E.  Swain,  Republican,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Northeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Jan- 
uary 1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  J.  A.  Cooley,  term  expired. 

Roland  A.  Zeigel,  Republican,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Northeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Jan- 
uary 1,  1951,  and  tmtil  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  329 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Richard  Johnson,  2420  St.  Joseph  Avenue,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Feb- 
ruary 19,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  H.  N.  Stevenson,  term  expired. 

Harold  F.  Thomson,  1718  Crescent  Drive,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Feb- 
ruary 19,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Wm.  R.  Seaman,  term  expired. 

F.  Claude  Davis,  Jr.,  30th  and  Francis,  St.  Joseph,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  February 
19,  1948,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Leo  V.  Anderson,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


330  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FfcBRUARY  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  196 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the   Senate   of  the   63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

F.  M.  Horton,  Flat  River,  Missouri,  as  the  Supervisor  of 
Building  and  Loan  Associations,  for  a  term  ending  at  the 
pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  T.  Victor  Jeffries,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  20,  1945 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  197 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Edgar  C.  Nelson,  Boonville,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Workmen's  Compensation  Commission  for  a  term  ending 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M,  DONNELLY  331 

February  19,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

I  designate  Mr.  Nelson  as  Chairman  of  the  Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

F'EBRUARY  20,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  197 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Richard  L.  Douglas,  Republican,  1125  Krug  Park  Place, 
St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents 
for  Northwest  Missouri  State  Teachers  College,  Maryville, 
Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

J.  V.  Gaddy,  Democrat,  2725  Sacramento  Street,  St. 
Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for 
Northwest  Missouri  State  Teachers  College,  Maryville,  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Edmond!  Mc- 
Williams,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


332  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  20,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  198 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Edward  L.  Clark,  Rolla,  Missouri,  as  State  Geologist,  for 
a  term  ending  August  1,  1945,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  H.  A.  Buehler,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  20,  1945 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  198 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  20,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

R.  E.  Burley,  Republican,  Lebanon,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Southwest  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Springfield,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending 
January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  333 

Seth  V.  Conrad,  Democrat,  Marshfield,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Southwest  Missouri 
State  Teachers  College,  Springfield,  Missouri,  for  a  term  end- 
ing January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  B.  F.  Julian,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MABCH  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  218 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  6,  1945. 

Mr.    Kirk   Jones,    Secretary    of   the    Senate,    Jefferson    City, 
Missouri: 

Dear  Mr.  Jones: 

Please  convey  to  the  members  of  the  State  Senate  my 
sincere  thanks  for  the  beautiful  bouquet  of  flowers  and  the 
enrolled  copy  of  the  resolution  adopted  by  the  Senate  in  honor 
of  my  birthday.  It  was  most  thoughtful  of  the  Senate  to  do 
this  and  I  appreciate  it  very  much. 

With  kindest  regards,  I  am 

Sincerely, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY. 


334  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

March  7,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  367 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  7,  1945. 

Mr.  Herold  D.  Condray,  Chief  Clerk,  House  of  Representatives, 
Jefferson  City,  Missouri: 

Dear  Mr.  Condray: 

I  wish  to  express  through  you  my  thanks  and  apprecia- 
tion to  the  members  of  the  House  of  Representatives  for  their 
courtesy  in  adopting  House  Resolution  No.  90,  in  honor  of 
my  birthday. 

With  best  wishes,  I  am 

Sincerely, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  238-289 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  13,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

L.  N.  Coffman,  Salem,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board 
of  Trustees  of  the  Federal  Soldiers'  Home  at  St.  James,  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  February  1,  1949,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  335 

W.  E.  Barton,  Houston,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Federal  Soldiers'  Home  at  St.  James, 
Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  February  1,  1949,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Earl  E.  Young, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  239 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  13,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Roy  W.  Starling,  Republican,  Eldon,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Central  Missouri  State  Teach- 
ers College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  January 
1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  reappointment. 

R.  Lee  Cooper,  Democrat,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Central  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending 
January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


336  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate  pp.  $39-t4O 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  €mr, 
March  13,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Orville  Zimmerman,  Democrat,  Kennett,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Southeast  Missouri 
State  Teachers  College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

I.  R.  Kelso,  Democrat,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Southeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  for  a  term  end- 
ing January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  14,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  14,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M,  DONNELLY  337 

Frank  C.  Mann,  Springfield,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Allen  McReynolds,  Carthage,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Cowgill  Blair,  term  expired. 

Guy  A.  Thompson,  275  Union,  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Tom  K.  Smith, 
term  expired. 

Stratton  Shartel,  601  West  Meyer  Blvd.,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1947,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Mrs. 
Henry  J.  Haskell,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 
PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  15,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  260 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  Cmr, 
March  15,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


338  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Edmund  Burke,  Moberly,  Missouri,  as  Supervisor  of 
Liquor  Control,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Gov- 
ernor; vice,  Wayne  G.  Henderson. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  19-,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  269 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  OTY, 
March  19,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

M.  E.  Morris,  Trenton,  Missouri,  as  Commissioner  of 
Finance,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor; 
vice,  D.  R.  Harrison. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  19.,  1945 
From  the  Jotumal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  269-270 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
Marct  19,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  339 

Fred  W.  Naeter,  Republican,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemos- 
ynary Institutions,  for  a  term  ending  June  19,  1948,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Ira  A.  Jones, 
term  expired. 

T.  W.  Cotton,  Democrat,  Van  Buren,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary 
Institutions,  for  a  term  ending  June  19,  1948,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Joe  M.  Roberts,  Republican,  Gallatin,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary 
Institutions  for  a  term  ending  June  19,  1947,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  C.  B.  Dubois, 
resigned. 

I  hereby  designate  W.  R.  Painter,  who  is  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  State  Eleemosynary  Institu- 
tions, as  president  of  said  board;  vice,  Ira  A.  Jones. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  21,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  286 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  21,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  R.  M.  James,  Joplin,  Missouri,  as  Commissioner 
of  Health  and  Secretary  of  the  State  Board  of  Health,  for  a 


340  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

term  of  four  years  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Doctor  James  Stewart,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  329 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  'STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Carl  J.  Henry,  Butler,  Missouri,  to  represent  the  public 
as  a  member  of  the  Unemployment  Compensation  Commis- 
sion of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  June  18,  1949,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  George  A, 
Rozier,  resigned. 

I  designate  the  said  Carl  J.  Henry  as  Chairman  of  the 
Unemployment  Compensation  Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  341 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  28, 1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  S44- 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  28,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Paul  C.  Jones,  Kennett,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Highway  Commission  for  a  term  of  six  years  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Baxter  Brook- 
ing Bond,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  10,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  400 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  10,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

E.  L.  McClintock,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Public  Service  Commission,  for  a  term  ending  April 
15,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  John  A.  Ferguson,  resigned. 


342  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Morris  E.  Osburn,  Shelbyville,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Public  Service  Commission  for  a  term  ending  April  15, 
1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  Albert  Miller,  resigned. 

I  designate  the  said  Morris  E.  Osburn  as  Chairman  of  the 
Public  Service  Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  18,  1945 
Front  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  18,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Charles  L.  Henson,  Springfield,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Public  Service  Commission,  for  a  term  ending  April  15, 
1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappomtment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  343 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APKIL  19,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  494 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  19,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

John  A.  Harris,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  Adjutant  General 
of  the  State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure 
of  the  Governor;  vice,  Clifford  W.  Gaylord. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  2,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  607 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  -STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  2,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Miss  Nelle  Cummins,  Democrat,  5503  Tracy,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the 
State  Eleemosynary  Institutions,  for  a  term  ending  June  19, 


344  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

1947,  and  until  her  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Mrs.  Alice  R.  Seidlitz,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  10, 1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  683 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  >STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CTTY, 
May  10,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

William  Wildeboor,  Democrat,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Social  Security  Commission,  for  a 
term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 
qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Wallace  Crossley,  deceased. 

Roy  E.  Taylor,  Republican,  Herculaneum,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Social  Security  Commission,  for  a  term 
ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  William  T.  Nardin,  term  expired. 

Carl  G.  Stifel,  Republican,  625  S.  Skinker,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Social  Security  Commis- 
sion, for  a  term  ending  June  29,  1945,  and  until  his  successor 
is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Morton  T.  Jones, 
resigned. 

I  designate  the  said  William  Wildeboor  as  Chairman  of 
the  State  Social  Security  Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  345 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY  AND 
THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  12,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  922 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  12,  1945, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State: 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of 
the  State  of  Missouri: 

In  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  24,  I  have  appointed  the  fol- 
lowing persons  to  serve  with  members  of  the  House  and  Sen- 
ate on  a  Commission  to  visit  the  Tennessee  Valley  Authority 
and  make  a  report  of  its  findings  and  recommendations  as 
provided  for  in  said  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  24: 

Colonel  Frank  G.  Jonah,  7364  Pershing  Avenue,  Univer- 
sity City,  5,  Missouri. 

F.  V.  Heinkel,  President,  Missouri  Farmers  Association, 
Robertsville,  Missouri, 

L.  T.  Berthe,  Charleston,  Missouri. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 

Governor, 
Attest: 

WILSON  BELL, 

Secretary  of  State. 

P.  F.  WILLIS, 
Chief  Clerk. 


346  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  21,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  773 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  21,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Frank  L.  Ramacciotti,  Democrat,  4919  McCausland  Ave- 
nue, St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Chairman  of  the 
Board  of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  City  of  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Jesse  W.  Barrett,  term  expired. 

Henry  A.  Hamilton,  Republican,  1226  Clara  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Secretary  of  the  Board  of 
Election  Commissioners  for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Alphonse  G.  Eberle,  term  expired. 

Lawrence  Boogher,  Democrat,  6241  Waterman  Avenue, 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election 
Commissioners  for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  A.  Sidney  Johnston,  term  expired. 

George  P.  Utter,  Republican,  5619  Neosho,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four 
years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Wil- 
liam J.  Blesse,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  347 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE  4,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  11 52-11 53 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  4,  1945. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  268,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  for  the  cost  of  assessing  and 
collecting  the  revenue  and  to  pay  the  per  diem  of  the 
Secretary  of  the  State  Board  of  Equalization  and  other 
expenses  for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1945,  and  end- 
ing June  30,  1946,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

I  have  approved  House  Bill  No.  268.  However,  I  respect- 
fully wish  to  make  the  following  statement  in  connection  with 
one  item  in  this  bill: 

Section  1,  among  other  things,  states,  "Including  the  per 
diem  of  the  Secretary."  Then  under  "Personal  Service"  it 
states : 

"Per  Diem  of  the  Secretary $1000.00," 

This  is  very  indefinite  and  does  not  give  any  indication 
as  to  what  secretary  or  to  whom  the  $1000.00  should  be  paid. 
However,  in  the  title  of  the  bill  it  is  stated,  "to  pay  the  per 
diem  of  the  Secretary  of  the  State  Board  of  Equalization." 

The  title  of  a  bill  is  supposed  to  refer  to  or  point  out  the 
subject  matter  contained  in  the  bill.  As  has  been  stated  by 
one  of  the  courts,  "The  evident  object  of  the  provision  of  the 
organic  law  relative  to  the  title  of  an  act  was  to  have  the  title, 
like  a  guide-board,  indicate  the  general  contents  of  the  bill." 
....  However,  in  House  Bill  No.  268  the  title  refers  to 
or  points  out  subject  matter  that  is  not  in  the  bill  because  no 
reference  whatever  is  made  in  Section  1  of  the  bill  to  the 
State  Board  of  Equalization.  If  we  consider  the  title  as  a 


348  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

part  of  the  bill,  then,  of  course,  we  know  that  the  Secretary 
of  the  State  Board  of  Equalization  is  referred  to,  but  the  seri- 
ous question  is,  as  above  stated,  that  the  title  refers  to  or 
points  out  a  matter  that  is  not  in  the  bill  itself. 

The  intention  of  the  legislature  as  expressed  in  the  title 
of  this  act  is  "To  appropriate  money  ...  to  pay  the  per 
diem  of  the  Secretary  of  the  State  Board  of  Equalization." 
...  I  am  resolving  the  benefit  of  the  doubt  in  favor  of  the 
validity  of  this  item  in  the  bill,  but  respectfully  call  attention 
to  the  fact  that  some  official  or  department  of  the  State  gov- 
ernment should  be  designated  in  the  bill  to  whom  appropria- 
tions shall  be  paid. 

On  June  4,  1945,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  268. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  6,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  893-894 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Paul  Hamilton,  1055  West  55th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  July  8,  1945,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Harry  M.  Gambrel,  resigned. 

Roger  S.  Miller,  660  Romany  Road,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  349 

Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  July  8,  1948,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Milton  B.  Schweiger,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  6,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  894 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

V.  J.  O'Flaherty,  Jr.,  909  Baltimore  Avenue,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Real  Estate 
Commission,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from,  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Byron  T.  Shutz,  term 
expired. 

Ray  R,  Dolan,  6401  Manchester  Avenue,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Real  Estate  Commission, 
for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  Eugene  D.  Ruth,  Jr.,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M-  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


350  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  6,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  902-90$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

Under  the  provisions  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  44  I  have  appointed  the  following  persons  as 
members  of  the  commission  known  as  the  Missouri  State 
School  Commission: 

Oak  Hunter,  Democrat,  Moberly,  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Henry  C.  Clark,  Democrat,  Boonville,  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Homer  L.  Pruett,  Democrat,  Higginsville,  Missouri,  for 
a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Roy  H.  Monier,  Republican,  Carrollton,  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

V.  A.  Sheppard,  Republican,  Richmond,  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

T.  G.  Banning,  Republican,  Brookfield,  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  351 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  7,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  905 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  7,  1945. 

To   the   Senate  of  the   63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Ludwick  Graves,  Democrat,  630  West  61st  Street,  Kan- 
sas City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Chairman  of  the  Board 
of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  City  of  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  Harry  L.  Thomas,  term  expired. 

Richard  C.  Jensen,  Republican,  319  East  Dartmouth, 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Secretary  of  the 
Board  of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  City  of  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Thomas  R.  Hunt,  term  expired. 

Joseph  R.  Stewart,  Democrat,  6933  Penn,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four 
years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
William  Francis  Woodruff,  term  expired. 

Wm.  E.  Davis,  Republican,  700  Ward  Parkway,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Com- 
missioners for  the  City  of  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Herman  M.  Langworthy,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


352  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  25,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1040 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  OTY, 
June  25,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Win.  L.  Smith,  7611  Rosedale  Drive,  Normandy,  Mis- 
souri, as  State  Purchasing  Agent,  for  a  term  ending  at  the 
pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  Ted  R,  Ferguson. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  25,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1041 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  25,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Carl  G.  Stifel,  Republican,  625  S.  Skinker,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Social  Security  Commis- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  353 

sion,  for  a  term  of  four  years  commencing  June  30,  1945,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1066-1067 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Ronnie  F.  Greenwell,  Hayti,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  State  Soil  Districts  Commission,  for  a  term  ending  three 
years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


354  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1O67 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Clarence  Evans,  Democrat,  Paris,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Tax  Commission  for  a  term  ending  June  17,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1037 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Harry  P.  Drisler,  Slater,  Missouri,  to  represent  em- 
ployees as  a  member  of  the  Unemployment  Compensation 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  355 

Commission  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  June  17,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  IMS 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

A.  H,  Cuneo,  6529  Edgevale  Road,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  State  Board  of  Account- 
ancy, for  a  term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  F,  R,  Brodie,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHILM,  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


356  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1068 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  or  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Walter  L.  Rathmann,  architect,  316  N.  Eighth  Street, 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Regis- 
tration for  Architects  and  Professional  Engineers,  for  a  term 
ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  reappointment. 

Frank  Beard,  professional  engineer,  Kahoka,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects 
and  Professional  Engineers  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reapp ointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  357 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1069 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Doctor  Major  G,  Seelig,  4954  Lindell  Boulevard,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for  the 
State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the 
Governor;  vice,  reapp ointment. 

W.  Ed  Jameson,  Fulton,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  end- 
ing at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  Leo  H.  Johnson. 

Doctor  Clifton  Smith,  2502  Faraon  Street,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State 
of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor; 
vice,  William  M.  Clark. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


358  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1O69 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Doctor  Ralph  A.  Kinsella,  4376  Westminster,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Health  of  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Cleveland  H.  Shutt, 
term  expired. 

Doctor  George  E.  Knappenberger,  8330  Holmes,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Health 
of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Ira  H.  Lockwood, 
term  expired. 

Doctor  Frank  H,  Rose,  Albany,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Board  of  Health  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending 
four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Doctor  John  I.  Byrne,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  359 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1070 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26,  1945. 

To   the   Senate   of  the   63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Sister  M.  Geraldine  Kulleck,  6420  Clayton  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and 
Registrars  of  Nurses,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the 
time  of  her  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  her  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  William  C,  Weinsberg,  3451  Halliday  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and 
Registrars  of  Nurses,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Max 
Starkloff,  term  expired. 

Mrs.  Corinne  Hamilton,  505  West  31st  Street,  Apartment 
9,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Ex- 
aminers and  Registrars  of  Nurses,  for  a  term  ending  three 
years  from  the  time  of  her  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  her  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Mrs. 
Lela  Rahe  Smith,  term  expired. 

Mrs.  Delia  J.  Ream,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars  of  Nurses,  for  a 
term  ending  December  1,  1945,  and  until  her  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Miss  Ruth  Story,  deceased. 

Miss  Luna  Thomas,  2817  S.  Kingshighway,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Regis- 
trars of  Nurses,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the  time 
of  her  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  her  successor 


360  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Miss  Mabel  Kehoe, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1O7  6-1077 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Lon  N.  Irwin,  2715  Monterey  Street,  St.  Joseph,  Mis- 
souri, as  the  Commissioner  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Inspection, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Orville  S.  Traylor,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  361 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1077 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To   the   Senate  of  the   63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Chas.  W.  Riley,  Medical  Arts  Building,  Springfield,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  for  a  term  end- 
ing five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualifi- 
cation and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  W.  C.  McGreevy,  term  expired. 

Vincent  Murphy,  701  West  74th  Street,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  for  a  term 
ending  July  2,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Ted  0.  Willard,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Jowmal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  10T7-1078 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  &7,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office; 


362  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Doctor  J.  Max  Daniel,  401  Bryant  Building,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Optometry 
for  a  term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  Dale  P.  Summers,  200  Guitar  Building,  Colum- 
bia, Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Optometry 
for  a  term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  J.  Allen  Selvidge,  term  expired. 

Doctor  George  A.  Winterer,  202  N.  7th  Street,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Optometry,  for 
a  term  of  five  years  commencing  June  30,  1945,  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor 
Alois  A.  Winterer,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1078 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Mrs.  Frances  S.  Burkhardt,  Forest  Park  Hotel,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Mis- 
souri School  for  the  Blind,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  her  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  her 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  363 

Martin  J.  Collins,  2919  Allen  Avenue,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School 
for  the  Blind,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Oliver  W.  Chilton,  Caruthersville,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  Martin  J.  Glaser,  3550  Hawthorne  Blvd.,  St.  Louis* 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Mis- 
souri School  for  the  Blind,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  C.  C. 
Chesterson,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1M5 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1079 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  T.  T.  Umbarger,  1435  E.  Delnxar,  Springfield 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  for  a 
term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 


364  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Jack  Grant,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1098 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

John  Gartner,  Paul  Brown  Building,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Barber  Examiners,  for  a 
term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 
qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Wm.  J.  Kloppenberg,  term  expired. 

J.  C.  Green,  Doniphan,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Board  "of  Barber  Examiners,  for  a  term  ending  four 
years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  L.  N. 
Dixon,  term  expired. 

J.  E.  Johnson,  5820  Forest,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Board  of  Barber  Examiners,  for  a  term 
ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Harry  G.  Sloan,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  365 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Jcnirnal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1099 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Doctor  T.  C.  Oyler,  Brookfield,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropractic  Examiners,  for  a  term 
ending  three  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 
qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  S.  J.  Durham,  1930  North  Circle  Drive,  Jeffer- 
son City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiro- 
practic Examiners,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Roy  M. 
Keller,  term  expired. 

Doctor  Otto  C.  Reinert,  4712a  Natural  Bridge  Avenue, 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiro- 
practic Examiners,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Kenneth 
0' Bryan,  term  expired. 

Doctor  F.  L.  Sisson,  Jr.,  Sikeston,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropractic  Examiners,  for  a  term  end- 
ing three  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  Doctor  John  C.  Bull,  term  expired. 

Doctor  Kenneth  H.  Davis,  4035  Prospect  Avenue,  Kan- 
sas City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiro- 
practic Examiners,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from  the 


366  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1099-1100 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

John  J.  Powers,  Democrat,  6250  Westminster  Place,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Highway  Com- 
mission, for  a  term  ending  December  1,  1947,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  George  H. 
Davis,  resigned. 

William  A.  Snider,  Republican,  Albany,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Highway  Commission,  for  a  term  ending 
December  1,  1945,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  William  C.  Connett,  resigned, 

I  designate  Paul  C.  Jones,  member  of  the  State  Highway 
Commission,  as  Chairman  of  the  said  State  Highway 
Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  367 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1100 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

H.  B.  Masterson,  Hayti,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University  of  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  January  1,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Joseph  M.  McCune,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1100-1101 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Mark  D.  Eagleton,  3746  Grandel  Square,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 


368  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Edwin 
Huffman,  term  expired. 

Ben  L.  Liberman,  4605  Lindell  Blvd.,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for  the  City 
of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Louis  Shifrin, 
term  expired. 

Francis  L.  George,  6210  Westminster,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for  the 
City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Thomas  F. 
Muldoon,  term  expired. 

Thomas  H.  Cobbs,  506  Olive  Street,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for  the 
City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  his  -appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Edwin  B. 
Meissner,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1101 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  desire  to  hereby  withdraw  from  your  consideration  the 
names  of  Doctor  Major  G.  Seelig,  4954  Lindell  Boulevard, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  369 

St.  Louis,  Missouri;  W.  Ed.  Jameson,  Fulton,  Missouri;  and 
Doctor  Clifton  Smith,  2502  Faraon  Street,  St.  Joseph,  Mis- 
souri, for  appointment  as  members  of  the  Cancer  Commission 
for  the  State  of  Missouri. 

Respectfully, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  11O1~110% 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEESON  CITY, 
June  27,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  June  27,  1945,  I  transmitted  to  you  the  name  of 
Mark  D.  Eagleton  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Com- 
missioners for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  and  I  gave  his 
address  as  3746  Grandel  Square.  However,  his  residence 
address  is  4608  Tower  Grove,  St.  Louis  City.  I  respectfully 
request  that  his  address  be  corrected  to  read  4608  Tower 
Grove  instead  of  3746  Grandel  Square. 

Respectfully, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


370  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  28,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1131-11S& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

June  28,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

John  Q.  Brown,  Democrat,  7814  Forsythe  Blvd.,  Clay- 
ton, Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Chairman  of  the  Board  of 
Election  Commissioners  for  the  County  of  St,  Louis,  Missouri, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Harold  D.  Carey,  term  expired. 

Oscar  Habenicht,  Republican,  60  Fair  Oaks,  City  of  La- 
due,  St.  Louis  County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Secretary 
of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  County  of 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  L.  John  Weber, 
term  expired. 

Eugene  G.  Tighe,  Democrat,  5501  Old  Florissant  Road, 
Normandy,  St.  Louis  County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  County  of  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  William  O'Herin,  term  expired. 

Elmer  W.  Held,  Republican,  7811  Grove  Avenue,  Shrews- 
bury, St.  Louis  County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board 
of  Election  Commissioners  for  the  County  of  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  Harry  Richards,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DCXNTNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  371 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  28,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1132 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  28,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

George  D.  Clayton,  Jr.,  Democrat,  Hannibal,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  De- 
velopment, for  a  term  ending  November  31,  1945,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  D.  Howard 
Doane,  resigned. 

I  designate  the  said  George  D.  Clayton,  Jr.,  as  Chairman 
of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development. 

D.  W.  Snyder,  Republican,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Develop- 
ment, for  a  term  ending  November  21,  1945,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  H.  A. 
Buehler,  deceased. 

I  designate  the  said  D.  W,  Snyder  as  Vice-Chairman  of 
the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development. 

Bert  Cooper,  Democrat,  Maryville,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development, 
for  a  term  ending  November  21,  1947,  and  until  his  successor 
is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  R.  A.  Johnston,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


372  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  28,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  11*3 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  28,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Doctor  Major  G.  Seelig,  4954  Lindell  Boulevard,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State 
of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor; 
vice,  reappointment. 

W.  Ed  Jameson,  Fnlton,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  end- 
ing at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  Leo  H.  Johnson. 

Doctor  Clifton  Smith,  2502  Faraon  Street,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State 
of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor; 
vice,  William  M.  Clark. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  28,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  28,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  373 

Burney  Fishback,  Perry,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf,  for 
a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reapp ointment. 

John  0.  Newberry,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  A.  A.  Jordan,  term  expired. 

James  A.  Coder,  Lewistown,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  A.  B.  Weyer,  term  expired. 

J.  Frank  Hensley,  Fulton,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf,  for 
a  term  ending  February  1,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is 
duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Waldo  Smith,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  28,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1141~114& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  -STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  28,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  June  26,  1945,  I  reappointed  Walter  L.  Rathmann,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects 
and  Professional  Engineers,  subject  to  approval  of  the  Senate. 


374  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

I  am  now  in  receipt  of  a  telegram  from  Mr.  Rathmann  advis- 
ing me  that  he  is  unable  to  serve  on  this  board.  Therefore,  I 
desire  to  withdraw  from  your  consideration  the  name  of 
Walter  L.  Rathmann  and  submit  to  you  the  following  appoint- 
ment, subject  to  the  approval  of  the  Senate: 

W.  Oscar  Mullgardt,  architect,  1620  Chemical  Building, 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Regis- 
tration for  Architects  and  Professional  Engineers,  for  a  term 
ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Walter  L.  Rathmann,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  16,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1192 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  16,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  86,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Section  9278  of  Article  1,  Chapter  51, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  eleemos- 
ynary institutions  and  the  authority  of  the  superintend- 
ent of  the  several  eleemosynary  institutions  to  control 
and  manage  them  and  superintendent's  compensation, 
and  to  enact  a  new  section  in  lieu  thereof  to  be  known  as 
Section  9278,  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter,  with 
an  emergency  clause." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  375 

On  July  16,  1945,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  86. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  the 
Journal  of  the  House  on  June  29,  1945,  at  page  1466,  shows 
that  the  emergency  clause  received  98  votes,  therefore,  failed 
of  adoption.  On  page  1487  of  the  Journal  of  the  House  on 
July  9,  1945,  a  correction  of  the  House  Journal  of  June  29  was 
made,  showing  two  additional  votes  for  the  emergency  clause, 
making  the  total  vote  100.  I  seriously  doubt  if  the  House 
Journal  of  June  29  can  be  legally  corrected  in  this  manner, 
especially  after  the  motion  to  lie  on  the  table  was  adopted. 
For  that  reason  I  think  the  emergency  clause  failed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1195 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Paul  Hamilton,  1005  West  55th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  July  8,  1949,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


376  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  24,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  12O1-1202 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  24,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  32,  entitled: 

"An  Act  to  make  it  valid  for  any  person,  a  resident 
of  Missouri,  even  though  such  person  is  under  the  age  of 
twenty-one  years,  who  served  honorably  in  the  active 
military  or  naval  service  of  the  United  States  at  any  time 
after  September  16,  1940,  and  prior  to  the  termination 
of  the  present  war,  to  borrow  money  for  certain  specified 
purposes  and  to  execute  a  deed  of  trust,  mortgage,  con- 
tract, agreement,  conveyance  or  any  other  instrument  in 
writing,  as  required  under  the  provisions  of  the  Service- 
men's Readjustment  Act  of  1944,  and  to  provide  such 
person  and  his  or  her  spouse  shall  not  have  the  right  to 
repudiate  his  written  obligation  because  it  was  signed 
while  he  was  under  the  age  of  twenty-one  years,  and 
validating  contracts  made  by  persons  under  the  age  of 
twenty-one  years  prior  to  the  effective  date  of  this  Act 
in  obtaining  guaranties  of  loans  under  Servicemen's  Re- 
adjustment Act  of  1944,  and  empowering  all  persons  resid- 
ing or  doing  business  in  Missouri  to  make  loans  under 
the  Servicemen's  Readjustment  Act  of  1944,  with  an 
emergency  clause." 

On  July  24,  1945,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  32. 
However,  I  wish  to  offer  the  following  suggestion: 

The  last  part  of  Section  2,  page  3,  lines  26  to  31,  inclu- 
sive, is  as  follows: 

"And  any  instrument  executed  prior  to  the  effective  date 
of  this  Act  by  a  person  in  obtaining  guaranty  of  a  loan 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  377 

under  the  Servicemen's  Readjustment  Act  of  1944  only 
who  is  under  the  age  of  twenty-one  years  but  not  under 
the  age  of  eighteen  years  when  signing  such  instrument 
is  hereby  validated,  ratified  and  confirmed." 

I  believe  this  part  to  be  unconstitutional  because  it  vio- 
lates Section  13,  Article  I,  of  the  Constitution  of  1945,  which 
provides  as  follows: 

"Section  13.  That  no  ex  post  facto  law,  nor  law  im- 
pairing the  obligation  of  contracts,  or  retrospective  in  its 
operation,  or  making  any  irrevocable  grant  of  special 
privileges  or  immunities,  can  be  enacted." 

I  think  the  remainder  of  Section  2  is  constitutional,  but 
I  call  this  to  the  attention  of  the  General  Assembly  because 
the  part  which  I  believe  to  be  unconstitutional  may  cause 
some  unfortunate  litigation  in  the  future. 

The  fact  that  a  part  of  Section  2  is  unconstitutional  does 
not  render  the  whole  section  unconstitutional  if  the  remainder 
of  the  section  is  complete  within  itself. 

On  this  question  the  Supreme  Court  of  Missouri  in  the 
case  of  Poole  &  Creber  Market  Co.  v.  Breshears,  125  S.  W. 
(2d)  23,  1.  c.  32  said: 

"Moreover,  even  if  the  legislative  declaration  above 
quoted  should  be  held  void,  as  unconstitutional,  it  would 
not  affect  the  validity  of  the  remainder  of  the  statute. 
It  is  well  settled  that  a  statute  may  be  sustained  as  con- 
stitutional in  part  though  void  in  other  parts,  unless  its 
provisions  are  so  connected  and  interdependent  that  it 
cannot  be  presumed  the  legislature  would  have  enacted 
one  without  the  other.  'The  test  ...  is  whether  or 
not  .  .  .,  after  separating  that  which  is  invalid,  a  law 
in  all  respects  complete  and  susceptible  of  constitutional 
enforcement  is  left,  which  the  Legislature  would  have 
enacted  if  it  had  known  that  the  exscinded  portions  were 
invalid.'  State  ex  rel.  Audrain  County  v.  Hackmann, 
275  Mo.  534,  205  S.  W.  12,  14.  The  rule  is  thus  succinctly 
stated  in  State  ex  inf.  Hadley  v.  Washburn,  167  Mo.  680, 
697,  67  S.  W.  592,  596,  90  Am.  St.  Rep.  430:  'Where 
the  part  of  an  act  that  is  unconstitutional  does  not  enter 


378  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

into  the  life  of  the  act  itself,  and  is  not  essential  to  its 
being,  it  may  be  disregarded,  and  the  rest  remain  in  force.' 
That  is  the  case  before  us.  The  declaration  complained 
of  may  be  eliminated  and  a  law  remains  as  complete  and 
workable  in  every  respect  as  it  is  with  that  declaration 
and  which  would  be  fully  express  and  effectuate  the 
obvious  legislative  purpose." 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  unconstitutional  part  does  not 
enter  into  the  life  of  the  section  itself  and  it  may  be  disre- 
garded and  the  rest  of  the  section  remain  in  force  and  effect. 
However,  I  suggest  that  it  might  be  advisable,  while  this 
General  Assembly  is  in  session,  for  another  bill  to  be  intro- 
duced, striking  out  of  said  Section  2  the  above  mentioned 
unconstitutional  part. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

•JULY  27, 1945 
Front  the  Xournal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1&08 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  27,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  47,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  11475  of  Article  2,  Chapter  76, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  elections 
and  the  counting  of  the  votes  cast  by  absent  voters,  and 
to  enact  a  new  section  in  lieu  thereof  relating  to  the  same 
subject  matter,  and  providing  a  method  of  selection  of 
persons  to  open,  canvass,  count  and  certify  said  votes,  to 
be  known  as  Section  11475,  with  an  emergency  clause/' 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  379 

On  July  27,  1945,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  47, 

However,  I  wish  to  call  the  following  to  the  attention  of 
the  General  Assembly: 

This  bill  provides  that  the  county  court  or  board  of  elec- 
tion commissioners,  as  the  case  may  be,  shall  have  jurisdic- 
tion in  the  appointment  of  election  judges  and  in  each  instance 
where  the  county  court  is  mentioned  the  bill  provides  "or  the 
board  of  election  commissioners,  as  the  case  may  be,"  with 
the  exception  that  it  does  not  so  provide  in  lines  19  and  25 
on  page  2  of  the  printed  bill  Truly  Agreed  To  and  Finally 
Passed. 

Line  19  directs  the  central  committee  of  each  of  the  two 
dominant  political  parties  to  furnish  the  county  court  with  the 
list  and  does  not  authorize  said  committee  to  furnish  such  a 
list  to  a  board  of  election  commissioners.  Line  25  authorizes 
the  county  court  to  select  and  appoint  such  election  judges 
when  the  central  committee  of  a  party  fails  to  submit  a  list 
of  judges  but  does  not  authorize  or  empower  a  board  of  elec- 
tion commissioners  to  make  the  appointment  under  those 
circumstances. 

If  the  General  Assembly  intended  that  a  board  of  election 
commissioners  should  also  exercise  these  powers  and  duties, 
the  words  "or  a  board  of  election  commissioners,  as  the  case 
may  be,"  should  have  been  added  after  the  words  "county 
court"  in  both  lines  19  and  25. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


380  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  31,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1209-1210 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  31,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Thomas  E.  Whitecotton,  Huntington,  Rails  County,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  Commissioner  of  the  Department  of  Penal  Institu- 
tions, for  a  term  of  four  years  from  August  1,  1945,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Lloyd  I.  Miller, 
resigned. 

I  designate  the  said  Thomas  E.  Whitecotton  as  Director 
of  Penal  Institutions. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  6,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  381 

Edward  L.  Clark,  Rolla,  Missouri,  as  State  Geologist,  for 
a  term  ending  August  1,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  6,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1221 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

D.  P.  Williams,  1  Crestwood  Drive,  Clayton,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  State  Board  of  Accountancy,  for 
a  term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 
qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Erik  C.  Boye,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


382  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  6,  1945 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  D.  W.  McKinnon,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  for  a  term  ending  October 
16,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Doctor  Howard  C.  McCoy,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate 9  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  €ITY, 
August  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Oliver  J.  Steppig,  3929  Iowa  Avenue,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  for  a  term  ending 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  383 

five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Will  H.  Harper,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  6,  1945 
From  the  Jwurnal  of  the  Semite,  pp.  1 222-1 2&S 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEESON  CITY, 
August  6,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  June  27,  1945,  I  appointed  Vincent  Murphy,  701  West 
74th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  a  member  of  the  Board 
of  Pharmacy,  for  a  term  ending  July  2,  1946,  to  fill  the  unex- 
pired  term  caused  by  the  resignation  of  Ted  0.  Willard.  On 
June  28,  1945,  I  was  advised  that  Vincent  Murphy,  although 
the  owner  of  several  drug  stores,  is  not  licensed  to  practice 
pharmacy  in  Missouri  and  therefore  not  eligible  for  appoint- 
ment to  the  Board  of  Pharmacy.  I  wish  to  withdraw  from 
your  consideration  the  name  of  Vincent  Murphy  and  submit 
to  you  the  following  appointment,  subject  to  the  consent  and 
approval  of  the  Senate: 

Clarence  F.  Wernel,  3629  West  Roanoke  Drive,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  for 
a  term  ending  July  2,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Ted  0.  Willard,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


384  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  31,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1227 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  31,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Hugh  I.  McSkinuning,  604  Chestnut  Street,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  State  Inspector  of  Oils  for  a  term  of  four  years 
from  September  1,  1945,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  George  Metzger,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

SEPTEMBER  4,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  18&8 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  4,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  have  appointed  Honorable  Morris  E.  Osburn,  Chairman 
of  the  Public  Service  Commission,  and  Colonel  Hugh  H.  Wag- 
goner, Superintendent  of  the  Missouri  State  Highway  Patrol, 
members  of  the  Governor's  Committee  on  Interstate  Coopera- 
tion to  serve  with  Honorable  Clarence  Evans,  Chairman  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  385 

the  State  Tax  Commission  and  ex-officio  Budget  Director, 
Honorable  J.  E.  Taylor,  Attorney  General  of  Missouri,  and 
Honorable  Hugh  Denney,  Director  of  the  Missouri  State  De- 
partment of  Resources  and  Development,  pursuant  to  an  act 
of  the  61st  General  Assembly  of  Missouri,  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1941,  page  405. 

I  designate  Honorable  Morris  E.  Osburn  as  Chairman  of 
the  Governor's  Committee  on  Interstate  Cooperation. 

The  above  Committee  to  serve  with  the  House  Com- 
mittee on  Interstate  Cooperation  and  the  Senate  Committee 
on  Interstate  Cooperation. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

SEPTEMBER  5,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  1515 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  5,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

In  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  161  of  the  63rd  General  Assem- 
bly of  Missouri,  I  have  designated  the  State  Commission  of 
Resources  and  Development  as  the  official  agency  of  the  State 
of  Missouri  to  cooperate  or  negotiate  with  the  Chief  of  Engi- 
neers or  other  authorities  as  designated  in  Public  Law  534, 
78th  Congress,  Chapter  665,  2d  Session  (H.  R.  4485),  or  any 
amendment  thereto. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


386  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

SEPTEMBER  5,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1521-1522 


Members  of  the  Joint  Session  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly: 

It  is  singularly  appropriate  that  the  members  of  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  should  meet  in  joint  session  this  afternoon  to 
commemorate  V-J  Day  and  to  welcome  the  dawn  of  peace. 
No  more  fitting  action  could  be  taken  by  a  representative, 
legislative  body  anywhere  in  the  world  than  the  meeting  in 
this  chamber.  It  is  unusually  significant  that  you,  the  chosen 
representatives  of  the  people  of  this  State,  meet  as  you  do 
today  because  Missouri  has  been  the  recipient  of  distinguished 
and  unusual  honors.  As  noted  in  your  Concurrent  Resolu- 
tion, which  called  for  this  assemblage,  the  scene  of  the  formal 
surrender  of  Japan  was  upon  that  mightiest  of  battleships, 
that  queen  of  the  greatest  Navy  this  world  has  ever  known — 
the  magnificent  Missouri.  On  the  decks  of  that  most  power- 
ful craft,  named  for  our  beloved  State,  representatives  of  the 
victorious  Allied  nations  assembled  to  accept  the  surrender, 
which  the  representatives  of  the  most  arrogant  and  despotic 
Asiatic  power  since  the  days  of  Genghis  Khan  were  compelled 
to  sign.  The  history  of  our  Nation  and  our  State  will  always 
record  the  fact  that  the  event  transpired  as  it  did.  And  Mis- 
sourians  of  generations  to  come  will  take  note  of  this  signal 
honor  and  will  be  proud,  as  we  are  today,  that  of  all  the  states 
of  the  Union,  ours  should  have  been  chosen  in  this  manner. 

But  we  should  be  derelict,  indeed,  to  all  our  deeper  feel- 
ings and  emotions  if  we  did  not  recognize  an  even  greater 
significance  in  these  events.  With  the  final  surrender  of  the 
arrogant  Japanese,  the  greatest  of  all  wars  was  brought  to 
a  victorious  close.  The  free  nations  of  the  world  have  con- 
quered. Those  who  feared  for  the  liberties  of  mankind  may 
put  aside  this  dread,  and  turn  their  thoughts  to  the  ways  and 
the  problems  of  peace.  Let  us  be  equal  to  those  days  and 
those  problems.  Let  us  anticipate  the  future,  and  in  our 
hearts  and  minds  resolve  to  act  with  the  same  high  courage 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  387 

and  the  same  noble  ideals  with  which  our  fighting  men  and 
women  gave  their  service  to  their  country.  Let  us  give  of 
ourselves  to  that  nobler  future  for  which  the  world  is  waiting. 

And  with  these  thoughts  in  our  hearts,  let  us  remember 
those  fallen  heroes,  the  gallant  youth  of  Missouri  who  made 
the  supreme  sacrifice  that  the  ideals  of  free  government  and 
our  way  of  life  might  endure.  As  for  those  young  men  and 
women  whose  names  are  so  honorably  inscr oiled  on  memorials 
throughout  this  State,  what  can  we  say  that  will  add  to  the 
honor  and  the  glory  that  is  theirs?  What  tribute  can  we  pay 
to  them  that  can  adequately  convey  our  devotion  to  them; 
those  who  so  nobly  performed  the  highest  duty  of  citizenship 
during  our  country's  awful  trial;  those  who  gave  that  last  full 
measure  of  devotion  that  freedom  might  live?  Their  heroic 
experiences  and  supreme  sacrifice  will  forever  inspire  in  our 
youth,  in  all  the  years  to  come,  the  proud  and  glowing  spirit 
of  patriotism  and  love  of  country.  With  them  in  death,  and 
honored  with  them  by  those  who  remain,  is  their  Commander- 
in-Chief,  who  joined  the  bivouac  of  the  heroic  dead  so  short 
a  time  before  victory  bells  were  to  ring.  Let  us  not  'forget 
him,  at  this  hour. 

And  so,  we  meet  today,  we  commemorate  the  great  sur- 
render and  V-J  Day,  we  pause  in  this  solemn  moment  of 
Thanksgiving.  We  lay  aside  the  pressing  problems  of  the 
moment,  as  we  consecrate  ourselves  to  the  future,  for  the  State 
which  we  have  the  honor  to  serve.  Elected  by  the  free  votes 
of  free  citizens  of  the  great  free  State  of  Missouri,  we  assemble 
to  express  our  deep  and  profound  feelings,  evoked  by  great 
events  which  culminated  in  the  final  surrender  of  the  enemies 
of  this  nation.  May  we  find  inspiration  in  the  heroism  of  the 
days  that  are  ending,  and  in  this  inspiration  find  the  strength, 
the  will  and  the  vision  to  go  forward  into  a  new  day,  along 
new  paths  of  honor  and  of  duty.  In  no  other  way  can  we  be 
worthy  of  those  who  fought  and  died  for  Missouri  and  for  the 
United  States  of  America.  We  are  also  mindful  that,  in  these 
inspiring  days  of  triumph  another,  and  the  greatest  honor  of 
all,  has  come  to  our  State.  The  President  of  the  United  States 
is  a  Missourian.  We  take  solemn,  humble  pride  in  that  fact 
of  history.  And  we  ask  Divine  Guidance  for  him  in  these 
moments,  as  we  express  our  gratitude  to  the  Almighty  for  the 


388  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

blessings  of  victory  and  the  opportunities  now  offered  to  us 
in  a  peaceful  world.  May  we  find  courage,  and  faith,  and  hope 
in  His  name  to  welcome  that  New  Era  which,  God  willing, 
can  be  the  greatest  the  world  has  ever  known. 

[PHIL  M.  DONNELLY.] 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  7,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1259 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  7,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Eugene  W.  Couey,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Probation  and  Parole  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Earl  T. 
Crawford,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  389 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  14,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1279 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  14,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

0.  J.  Creach,  Camdenton,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Probation  and  Parole  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Nelson  B. 
Evans,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  17,  1945 
Front  the  J&wmal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1279 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  17,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Paul  V.  Renz,  Platte  City,  Missouri,  as  a  Commissioner 
of  the  Department  of  Penal  Institutions,  for  a  term  ending 


390  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

August  3,    1949,   and   until  his   successor  is   appointed   and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

I  designate  the  said  Paul  V.  Renz,  as  Commissioner  of 
Farms. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  17,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1280 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  17,  1945. 

To  the   Senate  of  the   63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Henry  Kenyon,  Koshkonong,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Trustees,  Fruit  Experiment  Station,  for  a  term 
ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Robert  M.  Hitt,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  391 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  11,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1492 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  11,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Owen  G.  Jackson,  Webster  Groves,  St.  Louis  County, 
Missouri,  as  Superintendent  of  the  Insurance  Department,  for 
a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Edward  L.  Scheufler,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  16,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  149$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  16,  1946. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Thomas  R.  Douglass,  McBaine,  Boone  County,  Missouri, 
as  Commissioner  of  Agriculture,  for  a  term  ending  four  years 


392  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  John  W. 
Ellis,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  23,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1542 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  23,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Rolla  E.  Stephens,  Joplin,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Missouri  Real  Estate  Commission,  for  a  term  ending  October 
13,  1948,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  393 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  23,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1542 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  23,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  John  C.  Gordon,  8000  Seminole,  St.  Louis  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  for  a 
term  ending  October  16,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  24,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1630 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  24,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  ofl&ce: 

Proctor  N.  Carter,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  State  Admin- 
istrator of  the  State  Social  Security  Commission  for  a  term 


394  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Parke  M.  Banta,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

NOVEMBER  13,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1741*174$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
November  13,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Everett  Johns,  architect,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects  and 
Professional  Engineers,  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Bruce  Williams,  professional  engineer,  Joplin,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects 
and  Professional  Engineers,  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Ernest  E. 
Howard,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  395 


TO  THE  SENATE 

NOVEMBER  14,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1T4& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
November  14,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Floyd  W.  Jones,  Democrat,  Springfield,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Athletic  Commission  of  the  State  of  Missouri, 
for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice, 
Arthur  G.  Heyne. 

William  H.  Herring,  Democrat,  7716  Ivory  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Athletic  Commission  of 
the  State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of 
the  Governor;  vice,  Ray  L.  Shubert 

John  J.  Robison,  Republican,  Maysville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Athletic  Commission  of  the  State  of  Missouri, 
for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  Harry 
C.  Dodson. 

I  designate  the  said  Floyd  W.  Jones  as  Chairman  of  the 
Athletic  Commission  of  the  State  of  Missouri. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


396  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  7,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1953-195& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  7,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  194,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  2522  to  2811,  both  inclusive,  and 
amendments  thereto,  being  all  of  Chapter  11,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939;  an  act  of  the  61st  General 
Assembly  found  in  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941  at  pages 
415  and  416,  approved  August  4,  1941,  relating  to  jus- 
tices of  the  peace  in  townships  containing  75,000  and  not 
over  125,000  inhabitants;  and  an  act  of  the  62nd  General 
Assembly  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  623  to 
627,  approved  July  16,  1943  relating  to  justices  of  the 
peace  in  counties  from  200,000  to  400,000  inhabitants; 
all  of  said  acts  and  sections  relating  to  the  organization 
of  justice  courts  and  the  procedure  in  justice  courts  gen- 
erally; and  providing  for  an  effective  date," 

On  December  7,  1945,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No. 
194. 

I  call  your  attention  to  the  fact  that  an  act  of  the  61st 
General  Assembly,  found  in  the  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  at 
page  414,  is  not  specifically  mentioned  in  this  bill,  although 
said  act  is  a  part  of  Chapter  11.  However,  the  general  repeal- 
ing clause  may  have  the  effect  of  repealing  it. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOK  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  397 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  12,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2007 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  12,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Mrs.  Delia  J.  Ream,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars  of  Nurses,  for  a 
term  ending  December  1,  1948,  and  until  her  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  12,  1945 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2007 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  12,  1945. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

William  A.  Snider,  Republican,  Albany,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Highway  Commission,  for  a  term  ending 


398  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

December  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUARY  16,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2204 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  16,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

George  D.  Clayton,  Jr.,  Democrat,  Hannibal,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and 
Development,  for  a  term  ending  November  21,  1951,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

I  designate  the  said  George  D.  Clayton,  Jr.,  as  Chairman 
of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development. 

D.  W.  Snyder,  Jr.,  Republican,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and 
Development,  for  a  term  ending  November  21,  1951,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  re- 
appointment. 

I  designate  the  said  D.  W.  Snyder,  Jr.,  as  Vice-Chairman 
of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development. 

Allen  P.  Green,  Jr.,  Democrat,  Mexico,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Develop- 
ment, for  a  term  ending  November  21,  1951,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  399 

Louis  H.  Breuer,  Republican,  Rolla,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development, 
for  a  term  ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Paul  Kelleter,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUARY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  £248 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  18,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  303,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  10470,  10491,  10492,  10495, 
10499,  10500,  10501,  and  10502  of  Article  V,  Chapter  72, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939;  and  also  an  act  of 
the  Sixty-first  General  Assembly,  approved  June  27,  1941, 
pages  545  and  546,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941;  also  an  act 
of  the  Sixty-second  General  Assembly,  approved  August 
2,  1943,  pages  887  and  888,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943, 
relating  to  laws  applicable  to  city,  town  and  consolidated 
schools  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof,  nine  new  sections 
to  be  known  as  Sections  10470,  10487a,  10491,  10492, 
10495,  10499,  10500,  10501,  and  10502,  relating  to  the 
same  subject  matter,  giving  the  state  board  of  education 
and  the  state  commissioner  of  education  certain  powers 
and  duties  heretofore  vested  in  the  state  superintendent 
of  public  schools." 


400  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

On  January  18,  1946, 1  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  303. 
I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  Section  10501,  Article  5> 
Chapter  72,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  included  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  303,  was  amended  by  an  act  of  the  61st  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  approved  June  12,  1941,  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1941,  pages  536  and  537,  but  said  act  is  not  mentioned  in 
this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2G36-26S7 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  18,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  704,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  7373,  Article  11,  Chapter  38,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  assessment 
of  damages  to  private  property  for  public  use  by  munic- 
ipal corporations,  by  striking  out  of  said  section  after  the 
word  'of  in  line  9  the  words  'Section  21  of  Article  11' 
and  by  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  words  'Section  26, 
Article  L'  " 

On  January  18,  1946, 1  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  704. 

The  only  change  sought  to  be  made  in  this  bill  is  striking 
out  of  line  9  of  Section  7373  the  following:  "Section  21  of 
Article  II"  and  by  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  following: 
"Section  26,  Article  I,"  in  order  that  said  section  would  com- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  401 

ply  with  the  provisions  of  the  Constitution  of  1945.  How- 
ever, the  following  error  appears  in  the  original  bill  and  was 
not  corrected  in  its  passage  through  the  General  Assembly: 
The  Roman  numeral  II  (two)  is  written  11  (eleven). 

It  is  my  opinion  that  if  any  question  should  be  raised  in 
regard  to  this  error  that  the  courts  would  probably  hold  that 
the  General  Assembly  intended  to  strike  out  of  Section  7373, 
Section  21  of  Article  II  (two)  although  the  bill  is  written  Sec- 
tion 21  of  Article  11  (eleven). 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUARY  21,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  21,  1946, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office 
under  the  provisions  of  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  528  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly: 

Clarence  Evans,  Democrat,  Paris,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Tax  Commission  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Jesse  A.  Mitchell,  Republican,  Ava,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Tax  Commission  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reap- 
pointment. 


402  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Charles  A.  Miller,  Democrat,  20  West  36th  Street,  Kan- 
sas City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Tax  Commission 
for  a  term  ending  two  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  John  T,  WaddilL 

I  designate  the  said  Clarence  Evans  as  Chairman  of  the 
State  Tax  Commission. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUARY  23,  1946 
Front  the  Jcwrnal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2304 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  23,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office  under 
the  provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  481  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly: 

F.  M.  Horton,  Flat  River,  Missouri,  as  the  Supervisor 
of  Savings  and  Loan  Associations,  for  a  term  ending  at  the 
pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  403 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  2,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  2,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  308,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  10443,  10456,  10458,  10459, 
10461,  and  10464  of  Article  IV,  Chapter  72,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939:  also  Section  10463,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an  act  of  the 
Sixty-second  General  Assembly,  approved  March  3,  1943, 
found  at  pages  888  and  889,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943;  and 
also  an  act  of  the  Sixty-second  General  Assembly,  ap- 
proved March  5,  1943,  pages  906  to  908,  Laws  of  Mis- 
souri, 1943;  relating  to  forming  of  enlarged  school  dis- 
tricts, duties  of  certain  officers;  to  provide  tax  rates, 
quotas  and  apportionment;  organization  of  teaching  units; 
tuition  of  certain  pupils  to  be  paid  by  district,  how  deter- 
mined; assignment  of  pupils,  and  providing  for  abandon- 
ment of  certain  buildings  and  grantng  of  state  aid,  and 
to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  eight  new  sections  to  be  known  as 
Sections  10443,  10454,  10456,  10458,  10459,  10461,  10463 
and  10464  relating  to  the  same  subject." 

On  February  2,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  308. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  words  "state  board  of  equaliza- 
tion" in  line  30,  page  3,  Section  10454,  Senate  Bill  No.  308, 
should  have  been  stricken  out  and  the  words  "State  Tax  Com- 
mission** inserted  in  lieu  thereof.  The  law  relating  to  the 
State  Board  of  Equalization  was  repealed  by  House  Bill  No. 
529,  approved  December  19,  1945.  In  line  8  of  the  title  the 


404  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

word  "March"  should  be  "August";  this  same  error  appears 
on  page  2  in  line  8,  Section  1. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

PEBEUABY  4,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CtTY, 
February  4,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  310,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  10504  to  10517,  both  inclusive, 
being  all  of  Article  6,  Chapter  72,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  consolidated  high  school  dis- 
tricts in  counties  having  a  population  of  more  than  two 
hundred  thousand  inhabitants  and  less  than  three  hun- 
dred and  fifty  thousand  inhabitants." 

On  February  4, 1946, 1  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  310. 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  Section  10509, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  is  repealed  by  this  bill 
(Senate  Bill  No.  310);  this  same  section,  10509,  was  repealed 
and  re-enacted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  209  which  I  approved  on 
February  1,  1946.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  I  have  approved 
Senate  Bill  No.  310  on  February  4,  1946,  it  is  my  opinion  that 
Section  10509,  included  in  Senate  Bill  No.  209,  is  repealed  by 
Senate  Bill  No.  310  for  the  reason  that  Senate  Bill  No.  310 
was  the  last  bill  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  405 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  4,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  $427 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  4,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Frank  T.  Hodgdon,  Hannibal,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  4,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  €ITY, 
February  4,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Ernest  W,  Cooper,  Democrat,  Lee's  Summit,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  and  Chairman  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commis- 
sioners for  Jackson  County,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four 
years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and 
until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Edwin 
S.  Carroll,  term  expired. 


406  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

John  W.  Mitchell,  Republican,  Route  3,  Box  761,  Inde- 
pendence, Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Secretary  of  the  Board 
of  Election  Commissioners  for  Jackson  County,  Missouri,  for 
a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  C.  Roy  Layland,  term  expired. 

Fred  Redford,  Democrat,  Route  5,  Independence,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners 
for  Jackson  County,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  John 
M.  P.  Miller,  term  expired. 

Harvey  Roney,  Republican,  11514  Winner  Road,  Inde- 
pendence, Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election 
Commissioners  for  Jackson  County,  Missouri,  for  a  term  end- 
ing four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualifi- 
cation and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  Rex  V.  Hedrick,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  2602-2603 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  18,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  193,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  jurisdiction  for  magistrate  courts  in 
cases  of  misdemeanor;  to  provide  the  manner  and  form 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  407 

of  practice  and  procedure  in  cases  of  misdemeanor  in  such 
courts;  to  provide  for  the  duties  of  the  clerk  of  the  magis- 
trate court  in  such  proceeding  and  the  duty  of  the  cir- 
cuit court  and  clerk  thereof  on  appeals;  to  provide  for 
the  giving  of  recognizance  of  witnesses  and  of  the  defend- 
ant in  certain  cases;  to  provide  for  the  collection  of  costs; 
and  to  provide  for  the  effective  date  of  this  act." 

On  February  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No. 
193. 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  4,  Section  6,  line  3,  the  word  "if"  should  be 
"is." 

On  page  8,  Section  24,  line  2,  the  word  "in"  should  be 
inserted  after  the  word  "be"  and  before  the  word  "writing." 

I  believe  the  Secretary  of  State  can  insert  these  words 
in  parenthesis  in  their  proper  places  in  compiling  the  Session 
Acts. 

On  page  11,  Section  30,  line  2,  the  word  "section"  should 
have  been  "act,"  but  I  doubt  if  the  Secretary  of  State  would 
be  authorized  to  place  the  word  "act"  in  parenthesis  after  the 
word  "section"  because  it  might  be  construed  as  changing  the 
meaning  of  the  section. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  &605 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  18,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  345,  entitled: 


408  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  14571,  14572,  14575,  and  14577, 
of  Chapter  104  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
relating  to  proceedings  for  the  enforcement  of  laws  per- 
taining to  fences  and  enclosures,  and  to  enact  four  new 
sections  in  lieu  thereof,  relating  to  the  same  subject  mat- 
ter, to  be  known  as  Sections  14571,  14572,  14575,  and 
14577,  and  providing  for  an  effective  date." 

On  February  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No. 
345. 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
On  page  3,  Section  14575,  line  5,  the  word  "township" 
should  have  been  stricken  out  and  the  word  "county"  inserted 
in  lieu  thereof;  also,  in  line  8  of  said  Section  14575,  the  word 
"justice"  should  have  been  stricken  out  and  the  word  "magis- 
trate" inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

Also,  on  page  3,  Section  14577,  line  4,  the  word  "town- 
ship" should  have  been  stricken  out  and  the  word  "county" 
inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MABCH  4,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2818 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  4,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  409 

Richard  Johnson,  2420  St.  Joseph  Avenue,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Feb- 
ruary 19,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2900 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  6,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

John  A.  Harris,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  Commanding 
General  of  the  Missouri  National  Guard,  and  all  the  Mili- 
tary Forces  of  the  State  of  Missouri,  with  rank  of  Brigadier 
General;  vice,  Lewis  M.  Means,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


410  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2905 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  6,  1946. 

Mr.  Kirk  Jones,  Secretary,  Missouri  State  Senate,  Jefferson 
City,  Missouri. 

Dear  Mr.  Jones. 

Please  convey  to  the  members  of  the  State  Senate  my 
sincere  thanks  for  the  beautiful  bouquet  of  flowers,  and  the 
enrolled  copy  of  the  resolution  adopted  today  by  the  Senate 
in  honor  of  my  birthday.  I  deeply  appreciate  the  thought- 
fulness  of  the  Senate  in  doing  this. 
With  kindest  regards,  I  am 

Sincerely, 
PHIL  M.  DONNELLY. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  3577 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  18, 1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Committee  Substitute  for   House 
Bill  No.  765,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  11074,  11077,  11085,  11090, 
11093,  11095,  11098,  11099,  11101  and  11105,  of  Article 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  411 

8,  Chapter  74,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relat- 
ing to  collectors  and  the  collection  of  taxes,  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  ten  new  sections  relating  to  the  same  sub- 
ject to  be  known  as  Sections  11074,  11077,  11085,  11090, 
11093,  11095,  11098,  11099,  11101  and  11105." 

On  March  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  765. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  on  page  5,  Section  11101, 
lines  9  and  10,  the  words  "an  affidavit"  should  have  been 
inserted  after  the  comma  following  the  word  "Revenue"  or 
before  the  word  "setting"  in  line  10.  The  words  "an  affidavit" 
are  in  Section  11101,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 
Unless  the  words  "an  affidavit"  or  the  word  "certificate"  or 
"statement"  or  some  similar  word  is  used  the  sentence  is 
indefinite  as  to  what  the  collector  shall  transmit  to  the  Director 
of  Revenue.  I  think  a  bill  should  be  introduced  to  correct 
Section  11101  of  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  S582-3683 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  18. 1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  864,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  10971A  as  contained  in  an  act  of 
the  61st  General  Assembly,  approved  July  30,  1941,  found 
in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  714,  relating  to  the  land 


412  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS,  OF 

list  in  counties  of  400,000  to  700,000  inhabitants,  and  to 
enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  relating  to  the  same 
general  subject  matter  and  applying  to  all  counties  of 
class  one,  to  be  known  as  Section  10971A." 

On  March  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  864. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  your  attention  to  the  following 
words  on  page  3,  Section  10971  A,  line  52,  "for  the  use  and 
benefit  of  the  county."  It  is  my  opinion  that  these  words 
conflict  with  the  provisions  of  Section  7,  Article  IX,  of  the 
Constitution  of  1945.  Said  section  provides  as  follows: 

".  .  .  the  clear  proceeds  of  all  penalties,  forfeitures 
and  fines  collected  hereafter  for  any  breach  of  the  penal 
laws  of  the  State,  .  .  .  shall  be  distributed  annually 
to  the  schools  of  the  several  counties  according  to  law.'* 

House  Bill  No.  864  provides  a  penalty  for  the  failure  of  a 
recorder  to  make  up  a  land  list  in  the  manner  described  and 
provides  for  the  procedural  method  of  recovering  the  penalty. 

The  wording  of  the  Constitution  of  1875  and  also  the 
wording  of  the  amendment  adopted  November  7,  1944,  is  very 
similar  to  Section  7,  Article  IX,  of  the  Constitution  of  1945. 
The  courts  have  construed  this  wording  to  mean  that  pen- 
alties, fines,  and  forfeitures  shall  be  paid  to  the  school  funds 
of  the  several  counties  of  the  State.  I  call  your  attention  to 
the  following  cases:  State  ex  rel.  Jones  v.  Howe  Scale  Co,, 
253  Mo.  63;  State  ex  rel.  Lay  v.  Arthur  Greenfield,  205  S.  W. 
619;  State  v.  Bockstruck,  136  Mo.  335;  State  v.  St.  Louis, 
Iron  Mountain  &  Southern  Ry.  Co.,  253  Mo.  642.  I  think 
the  proceeds  of  the  penalty  provided  for  in  this  act  should 
be  paid  into  a  fund  which  shall  be  distributed  to  the  schools 
of  the  several  counties  as  provided  in  Section  7,  Article  IX, 
Constitution  of  1945,  and  that  the  proceeds  of  said  penalty 
are  not  "for  the  use  and  benefit  of  the  county,"  as  provided 
for  in  House  Bill  No.  864. 

I  do  not  believe  that  the  words  "for  the  use  and  benefit 
of  the  county"  in  line  52  on  page  3,  affect  the  remainder  of 
the  act,  so,  therefore,  I  have  approved  House  Bill  No.  864 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  413 

but  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  correct  the  uncon- 
stitutional portion  of  this  bill. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  S807 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  26,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  536,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Article  18,  Chapter  74,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  taxation  of  merchants,  and 
to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  twenty-eight  new  sections  relating 
to  the  same  subject  matter  and  to  be  numbered,  11303, 
11304,  11305,  11306,  11307,  11308,  11309,  11309a,  11310, 
11311,  11312,  11313,  11314,  11315,  11316,  11317,  11318, 
11319,  11320,  11321,  11322,  11323,  11324,  11325,  11326, 
11327,  11328,  and  11329,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

On  March  26,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  536. 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  12,  Section  11328,  line  4,  the  word  and  figure 
"Section  5"  evidently  refers  to  Section  11306,  as  that  is  the 
section  that  pertains  to  the  execution  of  a  bond.  As  a  sugges- 
tion I  think  the  Secretary  of  State,  when  the  Session  Acts  are 
printed,  should  place  the  figures  "11306"  in  parenthesis  after 
the  figure  "5"  in  said  line  4  on  page  12. 


414  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

In  Section  1,  line  9,  the  words  "with  an  emergency  clause** 
should  have  been  stricken  out. 

On  page  8,  Section  11311,  line  8,  the  words  "to  each" 
should  have  been  stricken  out. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MABCH  29,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  8986 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  29,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  652,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  an  act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly, 
approved  July  27,  1943,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943, 
pages  1012  to  1029,  inclusive,  relating  to  and  known  as 
the  'Sales  Tax  Act',  and  to  enact  50  new  sections  in  lieu 
thereof  to  be  known  as  Sections  11407  to  11455A  both 
inclusive,  relating  to  the  same  subject,  to  be  known  as 
the  'Sales  Tax  Act'  with  an  emergency  clause." 

On  Majch  29,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  652. 
I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  19,  Section  11449,  lines  3,  6,  7  and  on  page  20, 
line  13,  the  word  and  figure  "Section  6"  should  have  been 
"Section  11411." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  415 

On  page  21,  Section  11453,  lines  1  and  2,  the  word  and 
figure  "Section  4"  should  have  been  "Section  11409." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  5,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  4O17 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  5,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  886,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  an  Act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly, 
approved  August  2,  1941,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1941,  on  pages  339  and  340,  providing  for  a  law  library 
fee  in  civil  actions  and  for  the  maintenance  of  a  law 
library  in  counties  containing  200,000  to  400,000  inhabit- 
ants, and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  three  new  sections  relat- 
ing to  the  same  subject,  in  counties  of  Class  I." 

On  April  5,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  886. 
However,  I  wish  to  make  this  comment.  In  the  title  and 
also  in  the  enacting  clause  in  Section  1,  it  states  that  the  act 
of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1941,  at  pages  339  and  340,  was  approved  August  2,  1941. 
This  is  an  error,  it  was  approved  June  12,  1941 :  see  page  340, 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1941. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


416  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  5,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  4018 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  5,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  796,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  8715  and  8716  of  Article  11, 
Chapter  46,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating 
to  special  benefit  assessment  road  districts  in  counties 
not  under  township  organization,  ^nd  to  enact  in  lieu 
thereof  one  new  section  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter,  to  be  known  as  Section  8715." 

On  April  5,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  796. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  1,  Section  8715  states  in  substance  that  county 
courts  shall  cause  to  be  set  aside  and  placed  to  the  credit  of 
each  road  district  so  incorporated  four-fifths  of  the  tax  col- 
lected and  paid  by  authority  of  Section  8527.  This  section 
(Section  8527)  specifically  provides  that  the  county  court  may 
levy  and  collect  a  special  tax  not  exceeding  twenty-five  cents 
on  each  one  hundred  dollars  valuation  to  be  used  for  road  and 
bridge  purposes,  but  for  no  other  purposes  whatever.  (Under- 
scoring mine.) 

House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  796,  Sec- 
tion 8715,  commencing  in  line  5,  states  in  substance  that  all 
revenue  set  aside  and  placed  to  the  credit  of  the  road  district 
shall  be  used  for  constructing,  repairing  and  maintaining 
bridges  and  culverts  within  the  district,  and  also  working,  re- 
pairing, maintaining  and  dragging  public  roads  within  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  417 

district,  all  of  which  I  think  is  within  the  provisions  of  Sec- 
tion 8527  where  it  states  "to  be  used  for  road  and  bridge  pur- 
poses"; however,  on  page  2,  lines  10,  11  and  12  of  said  Sec- 
tion 8715,  it  further  states  "and  paying  legitimate  adminis- 
trative expenses  of  the  district,  and  for  such  other  purposes 
as  may  be  authorized  by  law."  I  think  this  provision  is  too 
general  and  outside  the  scope  of  the  provisions  of  Section  8527 
wherein  it  says  "to  be  used  for  road  and  bridge  purposes,  but 
for  no  other  purposes  whatever." 

I  do  not  think  this  provision  will  invalidate  the  entire 
bill  and  for  that  reason  I  have  approved  the  bill  but  want 
to  specifically  call  attention  to  this  general  provision. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  6,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  453,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9454,  9456,  9457,  and  9458  of 
Article  1,  Chapter  54,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri 
of  1939,  relating  to  pensions  to  deserving  blind,  and  to 
enact  in  lieu  thereof  four  new  sections  relating  to  the 
same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  9454,  9456, 
9457,  and  9458,  with  an  emergency  clause." 


418  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

On  April  6,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  453. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

Section  9457  included  in  this  bill  (Senate  Bill  No.  453) 
was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  116  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  approved  April  24, 
1945. 

Said  Section  9457  in  this  bill  (Senate  Bill  No.  453)  is  the 
same  as  Section  9457  in  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill 
No.  116  except  the  word  "Comptroller"  is  used  in  Senate  Bill 
No.  453  instead  of  the  words  "State  Auditor"  used  in  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  116. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THElSECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  6, 1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  4080 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  6,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  468,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  11039,  11040,  11041,  11042, 
11043,  11044,  11045,  11046,  and  11047  of  Article  6,  Chap- 
ter 74,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to 
levy  of  tax  rates,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  ten  new 
sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject,  to  be  known  as 
Sections  11039, 11039a,  11040, 11041, 11042, 11043, 11044, 
11045,  11046,  and  11047,  with  an  emergency  clause." 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  419 

On  April  6,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  468. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
Section  11046,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  was 
repealed  and  reenacted  by  an  act  of  the  62nd  General  Assem- 
bly, Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  1008  and  1009. 

Said  Section  11046  was  repealed  by  House  Bill  No.  465 
of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  which  was  approved  January 
25,  1946. 

Also,  there  is  included  in  this  bill  (House  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  468)  Section  11039a.  There  was  a 
Section  11039a  added  to  this  article  (Article  6,  Chapter  74, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939)  by  an  act  of  the  62nd 
General  Assembly  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  at  page 
1066.  This  act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly  was  not  specifi- 
cally repealed  by  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill 
No.  468.  As  House  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
468  is  a  later  enactment  I  suppose  it  will  repeal  by  implica- 
tion Section  11039a  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hou#e  of  Representatives,  pp.  4024-4025 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  10,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  872,  entitled: 


420  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  salary  and  compensation  of 
sheriffs  in  counties  of  the  fourth  class;  providing  for  the 
appointment  and  compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants, 
providing  for  the  collection  and  disbursement  of  fees  by 
such  sheriffs;  providing  for  the  administration  of  jails  in 
such  counties,  and  providing  a  penalty  for  violations  of 
said  act,  with  an  effective  date." 

On  April  10,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  872. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

It  is  my  opinion  that  Section  5,  page  3,  of  House  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  872  conflicts  with  Sec- 
tion 13414,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  with  reference 
to  the  traveling  expenses  allowed  the  sheriff. 

Also,  that  Section  4,  page  3,  of  House  Committee  Substi- 
tute for  House  Bill  No.  872  conflicts  with  Section  13416,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  in  regard  to  the  allowance 
to  the  sheriff  for  board  of  prisoners*  I  think  Section  13414 
and  Section  13416  should  be  repealed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  11,  1946 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p*  40 S 4 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  11,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  673,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  421 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  4875,  4876,  4884,  4886,  4888, 
4898,  4900,  4901,  4902,  4916,  4922,  4923,  4925,  4926, 
4928,  4930,  and  4931  of  Article  1,  Chapter  32,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  Liquor  Control 
Act,  and  to  enact  seventeen  new  sections  to  be  known  as 
Sections  4875,  4876,  4884,  4886,  4888,  4898,  4900,  4901, 
4902,  4916,  4922,  4923,  4925,  4928,  4930,  4931  and  4948a, 
relating  to  the  same  subject." 

On  April  11,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  673. 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
On  page  10,  Section  4901,  line  43,  the  word  and  figure 
"Article  1"  should  be  "Article  2."     Also,  on  said  page  10, 
line  57,  the  word  "or"  between  the  words  "character"  and 
4 'intoxicating"  should  be  "of." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  12,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  8493 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  12,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  159,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  10734  of  Article  19,  Chapter  72, 
of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to 
contracts  for  furnishing  supplies  in  school  districts  in 
cities  of  five  hundred  thousand  inhabitants  or  over,  by 


422  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

striking  out  of  Section  10734  the  word  Tifty'  in  line  ten 
thereof  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  words  'five 
hundred'." 

On  April  12,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  159. 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
In  the  title  of  this  bill  and  also  in  Section  1,  it  states  that 
the  word  "fifty"  in  line  ten  of  Section  10734  is  stricken  out 
and  the  words  "five  hundred"  inserted  in  lieu  thereof.    The 
title  and  Section  1  should  read  "line  seventeen"  instead  of 
"line  ten." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  16,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3495-3497 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  16,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  239,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Providing  for  the  organization  into  a  magistrate 
court  with  divisions,  of  magistrates  for  districts  lying 
wholly  within  any  city  of  more  than  600,000  inhabitants, 
and  for  the  administration  of  such  courts;  providing  for 
the  duties,  powers  and  jurisdiction  of  such  courts,  and 
for  the  election,  terms  and  duties  of  constables  for  such 
courts;  providing  for  the  salaries  of  the  chief  magistrate, 
magistrates,  chief  clerk,  deputy  clerks,  chief  constable, 
constables  and  deputy  constables,  and  the  payment  of  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  423 

salaries  and  expenses  of  such  courts;  providing  a  magis- 
strate  fee  of  $6.00  and  the  fees  and  bonds  of  constables, 
and  increasing  the  bonds  of  the  chief  clerk  and  his  depu- 
ties; providing  for  the  auditing  of  the  accounts  of  the  chief 
clerk  and  the  constables;  providing  that  such  courts  shall 
be  courts  of  record  and  that  such  a  court  and  its  divisions 
shall  sit  in  one  place,  and  providing  for  the  classification 
and  distribution  of  the  business  of  such  courts,  and  re- 
quiring the  county  to  furnish  such  courts  with  court 
rooms,  offices,  equipment,  supplies  and  other  necessities, 
with  an  emergency  clause." 

On  April  16,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  239. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

This  bill  evidently  was  intended  to  apply  to  the  City  of 
St.  Louis.  However,  on  page  2,  Section  1,  lines  1,  2,  and  3, 
it  states  "All  of  the  magistrates  elected  or  appointed  for  dis- 
tricts lying  wholly  within  any  city  of  more  than  600,000  in- 
habitants in  any  county  of  this  state  .  .  ."  (Underscoring 
mine.)  There  is  no  city  in  Missouri  of  more  than.  600,000 
inhabitants  iix  a  county.  Another  bill,  Senate  Bill  No.  207, 
which  has  been  passed  and  approved,  provides  for  the  magis- 
trate courts  in  all  of  the  counties  of  Missouri. 

On  page  4,  Section,  9,  lines  1  to  4  inclusive,  there  is  this 
same  reference  of  a  city  of  more  than  600,000  inhabitants  in 
any  county  in  this  State* 

On  page  2,  Section  2,  line  3,  I  think  the  word  "county" 
should  be  stricken  out  and  the  word  "city"  inserted  in  lieu 
thereof.  In  other  words,  if  this  bill  applies  to  the  City  of  St. 
Louis  it  should  so  state  and  not  be  confused  with  the  provi- 
sions of  a  law  applicable  to  the  counties. 

On  page  3,  Section  5,  line  3,  in  referring  to  the  salaries 
of  the  magistrates  and  clerks  of  the  court,  it  provides  that 
they  shall  be  fixed  and  paid  as  provided  by  general  law  for 
other  magistrates  and  clerks  in  such  counties.  There  are  no 
"such  counties/'  that  is,  counties  containing  a  city  of  600,000 
inhabitants.  Said  Section  5,  line  16,  in  referring  to  the  salaries 
of  the  chief  constable,  constables,  and  deputy  constables, 
states  that  the  salaries  shall  be  paid  by  the  county  and  the 
county  shall  be  entitled  to  all  of  their  fees,  etc.  I  think  the 


424  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

word  "county"  should  be  stricken  out  and  the  word  "city" 
inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

In  the  title,  in  line  18  thereof,  there  is  a  provision  requir- 
ing the  county  to  furnish  such  courts  with  court  rooms,  offices, 
equipment,  supplies,  etc.  However,  the  title  states  that  it  is 
"An  Act  providing  for  the  organization  into  a  magistrate 
court  with  divisions,  of  magistrates  for  districts  lying  wholly 
within  any  city  of  more  than  600,000  inhabitants  etc."  This 
part  of  the  title  clearly  shows  that  the  bill  applies  to  districts 
lying  within  a  city  of  more  than  600,000  inhabitants.  No 
mention  is  made  of  said  city  being  in  a  county. 

On  page  4,  Section  7,  line  1,  the  word  "county"  where 
it  first  appears  in  said  line  should  be  stricken  out  and  the  word 
"city"  inserted  in  lieu  thereof. 

On  page  6,  line  18,  Section  12,  I  am  of  the  opinion  that 
the  words  "county  treasurer"  should  be  stricken  out  and  the 
words  "city  treasurer"  inserted  in  lieu  thereof.  The  same  cor- 
rection should  be  made  in  line  22  on  page  6  of  Section  12. 

The  emergency  clause  on  page  6,  Section  13,  refers  to 
the  organization  into  a  court  with  divisions  of  magistrates  for 
districts  lying  wholly  within  cities  of  more  than  600,000  in- 
habitants, etc.  No  reference  is  made  in  said  emergency  clause 
to  said  city  being  in  a  county. 

Although  there  is  no  city  in  Missouri  of  600,000  inhabit- 
ants in  a  county  I  am  of  the  opinion  that  the  legislature  in- 
tended this  act  to  apply  to  the  City  of  St.  Louis  and  this  is 
borne  out  by  the  statement  in  the  title  and  also  in  the  emer- 
gency clause. 

Section  31,  Article  VI  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  states: 

"The  city  of  St.  Louis,  as  now  existing,  is  recognized  both 
as  a  city  and  as  a  county  unless  otherwise  changed  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  Constitution  ..." 

While  it  is  true  that  St.  Louis  is  recognized,  under  the 
above  constitutional  provision,  both  as  a  city  and  as  a  county, 
however,  it  is  my  opinion,  that  the  provisions  of  this  bill  should 
specifically  refer  to  the  City  of  St.  Louis  in  view  of  the  fact 
that  Senate  Bill  No.  207  applies  to  the  counties. 

I  have  approved  this  bill  but  suggest  that  a  bill  be  intro- 
duced at  this  session  of  the  General  Assembly  correcting  these 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  425 

errors  so  there  will  be  no  question  but  what  this  bill  applies 
to  the  City  of  St.  Louis. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  8498-3499 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  19,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  371,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  6098b  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  approved  April  28,  1945,  known  as  Senate 
Bill  No.  74,  relating  to  taxation  of  insurance  companies 
and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section  to  be  known  as 
Section  6098b,  relating  to  the  same  subject." 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  371. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  2,  line  31,  Section  6098b,  reference  is  made  to 
Sections  6100  and  6102,  These  two  sections  have  been  re- 
pealed and  reenacted  by  House  Bill  No.  887,  of  the  63rd  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  and  this  fact  should  be  noted  in  construing  the 
provisions  of  Senate  Bill  No.  371 , 

Also,  on  page  2,  lines  36  and  37,  Section  6098b,  reference 
is  made  to  the  purposes  set  forth  in  Section  6095,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  Said  Section  6095  creates  the 
County  Foreign  Insurance  Tax  Fund-  There  are  no  "pur- 
poses" set  forth  in  said  Section  6095.  The  apportionment  of 


426  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  County  Foreign  Insurance  Tax  Fund  is  provided  for  in 
Section  6097,  which  has  been  repealed  and  reenacted  by  House 
Bill  No.  887  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly.  After  the  appor- 
tionment has  been  made,  then  under  the  provisions  of  Section 
10462  the  county  clerk  of  each  county  shall  apportion  the 
money  among  the  various  school  districts  in  each  county. 

In  order  to  clarify  the  meaning  of  the  words  "for  the 
purposes  set  forth  in  Section  6095"  I  think  this  bill  should 
be  amended  to  include  Section  6097  as  reenacted  by  House 
Bill  No.  887  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  and  also  Section 
10462. 

.   Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3499 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  Cmr, 

April  19,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  372,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  6301,  6302,  6303,  6304,  6306, 
6307,  and  6348  of  Article  2,  Chapter  38,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri  1939  relating  to  the  assessment  and  collec- 
tion of  taxes  in  cities  of  the  first  class  and  to  enact  in 
lieu  thereof  seven,  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  sub- 
ject matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  6301,  6302,  6303, 
6304,  6306,  6307,  and  6348,  with  an  emergency  clause," 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  372, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  427 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
I  believe  the  words  "next  preceding  such  fiscal  year,"  on 
page  3,  line  5,  Section  6303,  should  be  stricken  out.  Under 
Section  3  of  Article  10  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  all  taxes 
are  to  be  levied  and  collected  in  the  same  year.  Therefore, 
the  delivering  to  the  assessor  of  a  list  next  preceding  such 
fiscal  year  would  conflict  with  said  provisions  of  the 
Constitution. 

I  believe  it  would  be  advisable  to  introduce  a  bill  to 
amend  this  section  as  above  suggested. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3 £9  9-3600 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  19,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  424,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  9982,  9984,  9987,  9989  and  9990 
of  Article  1,  Chapter  59,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  also  Section  9983,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1939,  as 
amended  by  an  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  approved 
July  22,  1941,  pages  418-420,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941; 
also  an  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  approved  August 
2,  1941,  pages  420-422,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  all  relat- 
ing to  the  practice  of  medicine,  surgery,  and  midwifery 
in  the  State  of  Missouri,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  11 


428  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

new  sections  to  be  known  as  Sections  9982,  9983,  9984, 
9987,  9989,  9990,  9992a,  9992b,  9992c,  9992d  and  9992e, 
relating  to  the  same  subject,  and  transferring  to  the  State 
Board  of  Medical  Examiners  certain  powers  and  duties 
heretofore  vested  in  the  State  Board  of  Health." 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  424. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

In  the  title,  in  line  5,  it  should  read  "July  28"  instead  of 
"July  22."  Also,  on  page  2,  line  5,  Section  1,  it  should  read 
"July  28"  instead  of  "July  22." 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  on  page  5,  there 
is  a  section  designated  as  Section  9988.  This  section  is  not 
referred  to  in  the  title  of  Senate  Bill  No.  424  nor  in  Section  1. 
There  is  a  Section  9988  in  the  1939  Revised  Statutes.  This 
section  has  not  been  repealed  by  Senate  Bill  No.  424,  nor  any 
other  bill.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  said  Section  9988  on  page 
5  of  Senate  Bill  No.  424  is  not  referred  to  in  the  title  I  do  not 
believe  that  said  section  would  have  any  legal  effect  in  Senate 
Bill  No.  424.  In  other  words,  Section  9988  is  a  part  of  Article 
1,  Chapter  59,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  has 
not  been  repealed  and  so  far  as  Senate  Bill  No.  424  is  con- 
cerned said  section  of  the  1939  Statutes  is  still  in  full  force 
and  effect.  This  section  in  Senate  Bill  No,  424  undoubtedly 
will  cause  endless  confusion.  I  think  a  bill  should  be  intro- 
duced to  correct  this  situation. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  429 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  4.QS6-IOS7 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  19,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  899,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  salary  and  compensation  of 
sheriffs  in  counties  of  the  third  class;  providing  for  the 
appointment  and  compensation  of  deputies  and  assistants, 
providing  for  the  collection  and  disbursement  of  fees  by 
such  sheriffs;  providing  for  the  administration  of  jails  in 
such  counties,  and  providing  a  penalty  for  violations  of 
said  act/' 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  899. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  3,  Section  5,  lines  1  to  6,  inclusive,  the  sheriffs 
and  their  deputies  are  allowed  actual  expenses  for  each  mile 
traveled  in  serving  warrants  or  any  other  criminal  process  not 
to  exceed  five  cents  per  mile.  Section  13414,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  provides  that  the  sheriffs  or  other  officers 
shall  be  allowed  for  their  services  in  criminal  cases  the  sum 
of  ten  cents  per  mile.  The  sum  allowed  under  Section  5  of 
this  bill  conflicts  with  Section  13414,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939. 

On  page  3,  Section  4,  provides  that  the  sheriff  shall  re- 
ceive the  actual  cost  of  the  care  and  custody  of  persons  lodged 
in  the  county  jail  under  the  custody  of  the  sheriff.  Section 
13416,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  limits  the  amount 
which  the  sheriff  may  receive  for  boarding  such  prisoners  to 
seventy-five  cents  per  day.  This  bill  conflicts  with  Section 
13416,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  In  my  opinion  a 


430  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

bill  should  be  introduced  repealing  Sections  13414  and  13416, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  40S7-40S8 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  19,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  889,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  fees  for  services  of  county  asses- 
sors in  counties  of  the  second  class;  to  provide  for  the 
compensation  of  such  county  assessors,  the  method  of 
appointment  and  compensation  of  deputy  assessors." 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No,  889. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

Section  4  on  page  3,  which  allows  the  assessor  a  per  diem 
for  time  spent  attending  the  annual  assessors'  meeting  called 
by  the  State  Tax  Commission  and  provides  reimbursement  for 
transportation  expenses  in  going  to  and  from  said  meeting, 
is  broader  than  the  title.  The  title  of  the  act  does  not  men- 
tion such  per  diem  or  expenses  and  I  do  not  believe  that  the 
title  can  be  construed  to  include  per  diem  and  expenses  for 
these  meetings.  This  section  does  not  affect  the  validity  ol 
the  remaining  sections  of  the  act. 

Section  2,  page  2,  lines  1  to  4,  inclusive,  provides  that  the 
salary  of  the  county  assessor  in  counties  of  the  second  class,  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  431 

which  Buchanan  County  is  one,  shall  be  $5,000.00  per  year. 
Section  13487,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  applying 
to  Buchanan  County,  provides  that  the  assessor  shall  receive 
a  salary  of  $3,500.00  per  year.  The  latter  is  therefore  in  con- 
flict with  House  Bill  No.  889. 

Section  3,  page  2,  referring  to  the  compensation  of  deputy 
assessors,  is  in  conflict  with  Sections  13488  and  13489,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  same  subject.  Sec- 
tion 3  of  House  Bill  No.  889  provides  that  the  county  assessor 
in  counties  of  the  second  class  shall  fix  the  salary  of  their 
deputies.  The  sections  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  above  referred  to,  set  specific  amounts  for  the  salaries 
of  deputies. 

The  sections  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
above  referred  to,  apply  to  the  county  assessors  of  Buchanan 
County. 

I  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  repeal  Sections  13488 
and  13489,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  to  repeal 
Section  13487,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  at  least 
insofar  as  the  latter  relates  to  the  salary  of  the  assessor  of 
Buchanan  County. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  40S9-404O 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  19,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No*  676,  entitled: 


432  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  11343,  11345,  11346,  11349, 
11351,  11352,  11353,  11354,  11355,  11356,  11357,  11358, 
11359,  11361,  11362,  11363,  11364,  11365,  11366,  11367, 
11369,  11373,  11374,  11375  and  11376  of  Article  21,  Chap- 
ter 74,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  to  repeal 
an  Act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1943,  page  1064,  approved  July  13,  1943,  all  relating  to 
taxation  of  income,  and  to  enact  sixteen  new  sections  in 
lieu  thereof,  relating  to  the  same  subject,  to  be  known  as 
Sections  11343,  11345,  11351,  11352,  11353,  11354,  11359, 
11363,  11366,  11367,  11369,  11374,  11375,  11376,  11377a 
and  11377b." 

On  April  19,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  676. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  15  of  this  bill,  the  paragraph  immediately  fol- 
lowing line  94  is  numbered  "Section  10."  Said  paragraph  in 
my  opinion  was  intended  to  be  numbered  Section  11349,  since 
Section  11349  is  repealed  and  no  section  numbered  Section 
11349  is  found  in  the  bill,  and  for  the  further  reason  that  Sec- 
tion, 10  contains  subject  matter  similar  to  Section  11349, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 

However,  the  difficulty  about  this  is  that  the  title  states 
that  sixteen  new  sections  are  enacted  in,  lieu  of  those  repealed 
and  Section  11349  is  not  included  in  those  sixteen  new  sections. 
In  fact  there  are  seventeen  new  sections  enacted,  if  Section  10, 
which  should  be  Section  11349,  is  included.  In  other  words, 
in  line  2  of  the  title,  Section  11349  is  included  with  the  sec- 
tions which  are  repealed  but  the  title  does  not  reenact  said 
Section  11349.  Neither  is  it  reenacted  in  the  sixteen  sections 
included  in,  lines  10,  11,  and  12,  page  2  of  said  Section  L 

On  page  19,  Section  11351,  line  43,  there  is  a  reference  to 
"Section  11344  of  this  act."  No  section  numbered  11344  is 
contained  in  this  act  and  said  Section  11344  of  the  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  was  not  repealed  by  this  bill.  The 
act  states  that  Section  11344  contains  provisions  regarding  the 
annual  or  regular  distribution  of  income  of  trust  or  other 
estates.  The  section  which  refers  to  such  distribution  is  Sec- 
tion 11347,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  433 

On  page  19,  Section  11351,  in  lines  44  and  45,  reference 
is  made  to  "deductions  as  are  allowed  under  Section  11347a 
hereof."  There  is  no  such  section  in  the  act.  It  is  my  opinion 
that  the  deductions  referred  to  are  contained  in  Section  10 
on  page  15  of  the  act,  which  section,  as  I  have  stated  above, 
should  be  numbered  11349.  Both  Section  11349,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  Section  10  of  this  bill  provide 
for  general  deductions  for  expenses,  losses,  interest,  taxes, 
and  donations. 

I  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  amend  House  Bill 
No.  676  to  clarify  the  intention  of  the  General  Assembly  with 
regard  to  the  sections  referred  to  in  Section  11351,  page  19, 
lines  43  and  45. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  850$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  26,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No*  237,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"Relating  to  the  office  of  state  treasurer  prescribing 
his  powers,  duties  and  functions;  prescribing  various  rules, 
regulations  and  provisions  thereto  and  providing  penalties 
for  the  violation,  of  this  act;  with  an  effective  date." 

On  April  26,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  237* 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 


434  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

On  page  13,  Section  34,  lines  10  to  13,  the  bill  provides 
that  banks  or  banking  institutions  shall  give  security  satis- 
factory to  the  Governor  and  the  State  Auditor  for  the  safe- 
keeping and  payment  of  deposits.  On  pages  16  and  17,  Sec- 
tion 37,  lines  36  to  40,  the  bill  carries  the  same  provisions  with 
regard  to  additional  security. 

Section  15  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  provides  that 
banking  institutions  shall  give  security  satisfactory  to  the 
Governor,  State  Auditor  and  State  Treasurer.  The  two  pro- 
visions of  the  bill  above  referred  to  do  not  include  the  State 
Treasurer  as  one  of  the  persons  who  must  be  satisfied  as  to 
the  security  offered.  I  believe  that  the  Constitution  requires 
that  the  State  Treasurer  be  included  as  one  of  such  persons. 
I  therefore  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  amend  Senate 
Bill  No.  237  to  include  the  words  "state  treasurer"  in  line  38, 
Section  37,  page  17  and  line  12,  Section  34,  page  13. 

On  page  16,  Section  37,  line  24,  the  word  "visions" 
appears.  I  believe  the  word  which  the  legislature  intended 
was  the  word  "provisions,"  and  that  the  bill  should  be  amended 
to  correct  this  mistake. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp,  $503-^504 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  26,  1946, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 
Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  297,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  435 

"AN  ACT 

"Creating  a  department  of  the  state  government  to 
be  known  and  designated  as  the  department  of  revenue, 
including  a  division  of  collection,  a  division  of  budget  and 
comptroller,  a  division  of  procurement,  a  division  of  fund 
commissioners,  and  a  division  of  public  buildings;  pre- 
scribing the  powers  and  duties  of  the  department  of  reve- 
nue and  the  divisions  of  the  department;  providing  the 
powers,  duties  and  compensations  of  the  employees  and 
officers  thereof;  with  an  emergency  clause." 

On  April  26,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  297. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
Sections  29a  to  29g,  Article  V,  of  the  Constitution,  refer 
to  and  deal  with  the  non-partisan  selection  of  judges.    Section 
29e  of  Article  V  of  the  Constitution,  provides  as  follows: 

"All  expenses  incurred  in  administering  sections  29  (a)- 
(g),  when  approved  by  the  supreme  court,  shall  be  paid 
out  of  the  state  treasury.  The  supreme  court  shall  certify 
such  expense  to  the  state  auditor,  who  shall  draw  his 
warrant  therefor  payable  out  of  funds  not  otherwise 
appropriated." 

The  above  section  places  upon  the  Supreme  Court  the 
duty  of  certifying  such  expenses  and  upon  the  Auditor  of 
drawing  warrants  for  the  payment  therefor. 

Section  22  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  provides  that 
the  Comptroller  "shall  preapprove  all  claims  and  accounts 
and  certify  them  to  the  state  auditor  for  payment." 

Section  28  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  provides  that 
no  obligation  for  the  payment  of  money  shall  be  incurred  un- 
less the  Comptroller  certifies  it  for  payment. 

Since  Section  29e  of  Article  V  of  the  Constitution  carries 
no  provision  that  the  Comptroller  shall  first  certify  the  pay- 
ment of  expenses,  I  believe  that  this  section  is  in  conflict  with 
Sections  22  and  28  of  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution. 

On  page  18,  Section  43a  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute 
for  Senate  Bill  No.  297  provides  that  in  all  cases  of  accounts 
allowed  against  the  State  and  of  grants,  salaries,  pay,  and 


436  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

expenses  "allowed  by  law"  the  Comptroller  shall  fill  in  a  form 
of  warrant  and  this  form  is  transmitted  to  the  State  Auditor 
for  his  approval.  This  section  is  consistent  with  the  consti- 
tutional provisions  of  Sections  22  and  28  of  Article  IV  in  pro- 
viding that  the  Comptroller  shall  certify  all  claims.  I  believe, 
however,  that  it  is  in  conflict  with  Section  29e  of  Article  V 
since  that  constitutional  provision  provides  that  the  Supreme 
Court,  instead  of  the  Comptroller,  shall  make  the  certification 
with  regard  to  expenses  incurred  by  the  operation  of  the  non- 
partisan  court  plan. 

I  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  except  from  the 
provisions  of  Section  43a  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  297  those  cases  of  expenses  incurred  under 
the  provisions  of  Section  29a  to  g  of  Article  V  of  the  Con- 
stitution. 

If  this  is  done  I  believe  it  will  avoid  confusion  in  carrying 
out  the  above  constitutional  provisions  which  seem  to  be  in 
conflict. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

APRIL  80,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3508*8509 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

April  30,  1946. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  360,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  8367,  8368,  8371,  8378,  8392, 
8397  and  8402  of  Article  1,  Chapter  5,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  and  to  repeal  Section  8369,  of  an  act 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  437 

of  the  62nd  General  Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1943,  pages  664,  665  and  666,  and  to  repeal  an  act  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  known  as  House  Bill  No.  439, 
approved  July  25,  1945,  all  relating  to  regulations  and 
license  fees  for  motor  vehicles,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  there- 
of fourteen  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  8367,  8368,  8369,  8371, 
8378,  8392,  8392a,  8392b,  8397,  8402,  8403,  8410a,  8410b, 
and  8410c,  with  an  emergency  clause." 

On  April  30,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  360. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

The  title  to  Senate  Bill  No.  360,  page  1,  line  3,  refers  to 
Article  1,  Chapter  5,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939. 
The  sections  which  are  repealed  by  the  bill  are  contained  in 
Chapter  45  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  This 
same  error  appears  in  Section.  1,  line  2. 

On  page  7,  Section  8369,  line  75,  there  is  a  reference  to 
Section  5728,  Article  8,  Chapter  35,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939.  Said  section  was  repealed  by  an  act  of  the  62nd 
General  Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  864  to  867. 
This  act  in  turn  was  repealed  by  an  act  of  the  62nd  General 
Assembly,  Extraordinary  Session,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1944, 
page  45.  The  act  passed  by  the  Extraordinary  Session  of  the 
General  Assembly  in  1944  is  not  repealed  by  this  bill.  The 
section  which  in  my  opinion  should  be  referred  to  on  page  7, 
line  75,  is  Section  5728,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1944,  Extraordinary 
Session,  page  45. 

On  pages  4  and  5,  Section  8368,  lines  14  to  19,  inclusive* 
the  bill  provides  with  regard  to  certain  records  as  follows: 

"The  director  of  revenue  may  destroy  all  applica- 
tions for  registration  of  motor  vehicles  and  dealers  after 
the  same  shall  have  been  on  file  for  four  (4)  years,  but 
the  application  for  registration  of  chauffeurs,  registered 
operators  and  certificates  of  ownership  shall  be  preserved 
as  permanent  records/' 

House  Bill  438,  passed  by  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
and  approved  on  November  27,  1945,  authorizes  the  Com- 
missioner of  Motor  Vehicles  to  destroy  certain  motor  vehicle 


438  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

records  after  specified  lengths  of  time.  House  Bill  No.  438 
gives  such  authority  to  the  Commissioner  of  Motor  Vehicles. 
However,  it  is  my  opinion  that  the  provisions  of  House  Bill 
No.  438  remain  in  force  because  in  Senate  Bill  No.  360,  Sec- 
tion 8368,  page  4,  lines  1  to  4,  inclusive,  it  is  provided  that 
it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  Director  of  Revenue  to  carry  out 
the  provisions  of  this  article.  The  article  referred  to  is  Arti- 
cle 1,  Chapter  45,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  The 
provisions  of  House  Bill  No.  438  deal  with  matters  which  are 
closely  related  to  those  contained  in  Article  1,  Chapter  45, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  and  would,  therefore,  in 
my  opinion,  become  a  part  of  the  article.  Under  the  provi- 
sions of  Section  8368  of  Senate  Bill  No.  360  above  referred  to, 
the  authority  to  destroy  records  under  House  Bill  No.  338, 
would  therefore  be  transferred  to  the  Director  of  Revenue. 

The  provisions  of  Section  8368,  pages  4  and  5,  lines  14  to 
19,  inclusive,  of  Senate  Bill  No.  360  are  in  conflict  with  those 
of  House  Bill  No.  438  in  the  following  particulars: 

(1)  Senate  Bill  No.  360  allows  the  destruction  of  appli- 
cations for  registration  of  motor  vehicles  after  four  years. 
House  Bill  No.  438  requires  them  to  be  kept  for  five  years. 

(2)  Senate  Bill  No.  360  provides  that  applications  for 
registration  of  dealers  may  be  destroyed  in  four  years.    House 
Bill  No.  438  requires  that  they  be  kept  for  ten  years. 

(3)  Senate  Bill  No.  360  provides  that  applications  for 
registration  of  chauffeurs  shall  be  kept  permanently.    House 
Bill  No.  438  allows  their  destruction  after  one  year. 

(4)  Senate  Bill  No.  360  provides  that  applications  for 
registration  of  registered  operators  shall  be  kept  permanently. 
House  Bill  No.  438  allows  their  destruction  after  one  year. 

(5)  Senate  Bill  No.  360  provides  that  applications  for 
certificates  of  ownership  shall  be  permanently  kept.    House 
Bill  No.  438  will  allow  them  to  be  destroyed  after  ten  years. 

I  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  to  amend  Senate  Bill 
No.  360  in  such  manner  as  to  remove  the  conflict  with  House 
Bill  No.  438  with  regard  to  the  records  mentioned  in  the 
above  paragraphs  (1)  and  (2)  and  to  withdraw  from  the  bill 
the  provisions  that  the  applications  for  registration  of  chauf- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  439 

feurs,  registered  operators,  and  certificates  of  ownership  be 
preserved  as  permanent  records,  substituting  therefor  a  rea- 
sonable time  after  which  they  may  be  destroyed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  2,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  S510-S51S 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

May  2,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 
Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Bill  No.  347,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  creation  and  establishment  of  a 
department  of  corrections  and  prescribing  the  powers  and 
duties  thereof;  providing  for  the  division  of  penal  insti- 
tutions, educational  institutions,  and  board  of  probation 
and  parole;  providing  for  the  location  of  the  office  of  the 
department;  providing  for  the  establishment  of  a  merit 
system  for  all  employees  within  said  department;  provid- 
ing for  the  appointment  of  a  director  of  said  department 
and  fixing  his  qualifications,  duties  and  salary;  establish- 
ing a  state  board  of  training  schools,  prescribing  the  powers 
and  duties  thereof,  and  fixing  the  qualifications,  term  of 
office  and  compensation  of  the  members  thereof;  provid- 
ing for  the  permanent  office  of  said  board;  providing  for 
the  appointment  of  a  director  of  training  schools  and  fix- 
ing his  qualifications,  duties  and  salary;  providing  for  the 


440  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

appointment  of  a  superintendent  of  each  of  the  juvenile 
training  schools  and  fixing  the  qualifications  and  duties 
thereof;  providing  for  the  creation  and  establishment  of 
a  board  of  probation  and  parole  and  fixing  the  qualifi- 
cations, term  of  office  and  compensation  of  the  members 
thereof  and  prescribing  the  powers  and  duties  of  said 
board;  providing  for  the  governor  to  enter  into  inter- 
state compacts  relative  to  parole;  establishing  the  office 
of  said  board." 

On  May  2,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  347. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  pages  14  and  15,  Section  33,  lines  2,  3,  and  4,  it  is 
provided  that  the  salaries  of  the  superintendents  and  employed 
personnel  of  the  training  schools  shall  be  fixed  by  the  board 
within  the  limits  of  money  appropriated.  This  same  pro- 
vision, appears  on  page  18,  Section  38,  lines  3,  4,  and  5  with 
reference  to  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole.  In  view  of 
the  fact  that  certain  employees  of  the  State  Department  of 
Corrections  will  be  under  the  merit  system  it  is  my  opinion 
that  these  provisions  conflict  with  the  provisions  of  the  State 
merit  system  act  contained  in  House  Bill  No.  162,  wherein  it 
is  provided  in  Section  15  of  said  bill  that  each  employee 
appointed  to  a  position  subject  hereto  after  the  adoption  of 
the  pay  plan  shall  be  paid  at  one  of  the  rates  set  forth  in  the 
pay  plan,  for  the  class  of  positions  in  which  he  is  employed. 
This  pay  plan  shall  also  be  used  as  a  basis  for  preparing  budget 
estimates  to  be  submitted  to  the  legislature. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  Section  12,  Article  IV  of  the 
Constitution  of  1945  provides  that  the  Governor  shall  assign 
all  boards,  bureaus,  commissions  and  other  agencies  of  the 
State  exercising  administrative  or  executive  authority  to  the 
department  to  which  their  respective  powers  and  duties  are 
germane,  it  is  my  opinion  that  Section  21  on  page  10  should 
not  be  included  in  this  bill  as  the  General  Assembly  has  no 
authority  to  make  an  assignment  of  the  State  Board  of  Train- 
ing Schools  or  any.  other  board,  bureau  or  institution,. 

It  is  also  my  opinion  that  Section  42  on  page  19  should 
not  be  included  in  this  bill  In  the  first  place  there  is  no 
reference  in  the  title  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Sen- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  441 

ate  Bill  No.  347  of  the  subject  matter  contained  in  Section 
42  and  for  the  further  reason  that  the  convictions  or  pleas  of 
guilty  referred  to  therein  have  reference  to  persons  who  are 
not  inmates  of  any  of  the  Penal  Institutions  while  Senate 
Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  347  pertains  to  the 
inmates  of  the  Penal  Institutions  and  the  question  of  the 
parole  or  probation  of  such  inmates.  Sections  4199  to  4211, 
inclusive,  Article  18,  Chapter  30,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  are  complete  within  themselves  and  should  not 
be  included  in  a  bill  of  this  character. 

Also,  Section  43  on  page  20  should  not  be  included  in 
this  bill.  The  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole  deals  with  per- 
sons who  are  inmates  of  the  Penal  Institutions,  or  those  on 
parole  or  probation  after  they  have  been  discharged  from  the 
Penal  Institutions  and  this  class  of  inmates  should  not  be  con- 
fused within  those  who  are  about  to  be  sentenced  by  a  judge 
of  a  circuit  or  criminal  court  of  the  State.  Another  reason  is 
that  there  would  be  no  limit  to  the  number  of  parole  officers 
that  would  have  to  be  employed  by  the  Board  of  Probation 
and  Parole  in  order  to  comply  with  the  provisions  of  Section 
43.  This  is  a  burden  that  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole 
should  not  have  to  assume. 

On  page  17,  Section  36,  lines  2  to  5,  inclusive,  there  is 
this  provision: 

"Suitable  quarters  for  offices  of  the  board  shall  be  fur- 
nished by  the  department  of  corrections,  and  shall  be 
located  within  the  buildings  or  grounds  of  the  peniten- 
.  tiary." 

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  offices  of  the  Board  of  Probation 
and  Parole  should  not  be  located  within  the  buildings  or 
grounds  at  the  Penitentiary.  This  board  should  be  located 
either  in  the  Capitol  Building  or  the  State  Office  Building  or 
some  other  quarters  in  Jefferson  City  which  have  no  connec- 
tion whatever  with  the  Penitentiary  proper.  In  lines  5  to  8 
of  said  Section  36  on  page  17  it  is  provided  that  no  inmate 
of  a  penal  institution  shall  be  permitted  in  said  headquarters 
except  on  request  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole.  Every- 
one who  is  familiar  with  the  situation  knows  that  the  in- 
mates who  are  trusties  have  a  way  of  getting  information 
from  the  records  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole  and 


442  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

practically  every  inmate  in  the  Penitentiary  knows  the  exact 
status  of  his  application  for  parole  at  all  times.  It  is  all  right 
to  say  that  no  inmate  shall  be  permitted  in  headquarters  but, 
in  my  opinion,  it  is  just  a  waste  of  words  to  say  it.  The  infor- 
mation in  regard  to  applications  for  parole  or  commutation 
should  be  imparted  to  the  inmates  by  the  officials  of  the  Board 
of  Probation  and  Parole  or  through  proper  official  channels. 
The  office  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole  should  be 
located  in  some  building  away  from  the  Penitentiary  proper. 
The  board  can  hold  its  parole  hearings  at  the  Penitentiary  the 
same  as  it  does  at  Algoa  or  the  other  Penal  Institutions,  but 
all  of  the  records  and  files  should  be  kept  in  a  headquarters 
separate  and  apart  from  the  Penitentiary.  In  my  opinion  it 
will  improve  the  morale  of  the  inmates  in  the  institution  and 
at  the  same  time  stop  a  lot  of  the  "grape-vine"  information 
that  is  being  continually  circulated  in  the  Penitentiary  in 
regard  to  paroles. 

Section  34a  on  page  15,  authorizes  the  Board  of  Training 
Schools  to  grant  paroles  to  inmates  under  their  custody. 
Section  39  on  page  18,  lines  1  to  5,  inclusive,  provides  "The 
board  of  probation  and  parole  is  hereby  authorized  to  release 
on  parole  any  person  confined  in  any  state  correctional  insti- 
tution, except  persons  under  sentence  of  death"  and  that  all 
paroles  shall  issue  upon  the  order  of  the  Board  of  Probation 
and  Parole  and  shall  be  recorded.  I  think  there  is  a  conflict 
between  these  two  sections. 

Section  20  on  page  9  provides  that  the  State  Board  of 
Training  Schools  shall  have  charge  and  control  of  all  training 
schools  and  industrial  homes.  Section  29  on  page  13  provides 
that  the  superintendent  of  training  schools  shall  be  under  the 
direction  of  the  board  and  the  director  of  training  schools. 
I  think  these  two  sections  are  in  conflict  with  Section  8  on 
pages  4  and  5,  since  said  Section  8  provides  that  the  Depart- 
ment of  Corrections  shall  set  forth  the  duties  and  responsi- 
bilities of  all  superintendents  of  the  department.  These  three 
sections  make  it  difficult  to  determine  just  which  unit  will 
supervise  the  duties  and  responsibilities  of  the  superintendents, 

I  believe  that  all  the  sections  in  Article  1,  Chapter  48, 
should  be  repealed  and  re-written  to  conform  to  the  provisions 
of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  347. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  443 

In  Article  2,  Chapter  48,  I  believe  Sections  8994,  8995, 
8996,  9007  and  9008;  and  in  Article  3,  Sections  9010  and  9019; 
and  in  Article  4,  Sections  9022,  9023,  9024;  and  in  Article  5, 
Sections  9035,  9037,  9038,  9039,  9040  and  9042;  and  in  Article 
8  all  of  the  sections  in  said  article  except  9167,  all  in  Chapter 
48,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  should  be  repealed 
for  the  reason  that  these  sections  are  in  conflict  with  sections 
and  provisions  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill 
No.  347  and  they  should  be  re-written  to  conform  to  said 
Senate  Committee  Substitute. 

I  believe  that  Section  9118,  Article  6,  conflicts  with  Sec- 
tion 18  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No, 
347  in  regard  to  the  transfer  of  inmates.  Also,  Section  9119, 
Article  6,  should  be  repealed  as  it  conflicts  with  Sections  16 
and  31  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  347. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  3,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3516-8517 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  3,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  428,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  10845,  10846,  10847,  10848, 
10849,  10850,  10851,  10852,  10853,  10854,  10855,  10856, 
10857,  10858,  10859,  10860,  10861,  10862,  10863,  10864, 
10865,  10866,  10867,  10868,  10869,  and  10870,  being  Arti- 


444  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

cle  25  of  Chapter  72,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
relating  to  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind  and  the  Mis- 
souri School  for  the  Deaf,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  19 
new  sections  to  be  known  as  Sections  10845,  10846,  10847, 
10848,  10849,  10850,  10851,  10852,  10853,  10854,  10855, 
10856,  10857,  10858,  10859,  10860,  10861,  10862  and 
10863  relating  to  the  same  general  subject  and  providing 
for  the  creation  of  a  section  of  special  education  under 
the  State  Board  of  Education  and  within  the  division  of 
public  schools  and  the  appointment  of  a  director  to  head 
said  section/' 

On  May  3,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  428. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

Section  10851,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relat- 
ing to  treasurers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind  at  St. 
Louis  and  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf  at  Fulton,  their 
duties  and  their  bond,  and  Section  10852,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  duties  of  the  stewards  of 
these  two  institutions  have  been  repealed  by  Senate  Bill  No. 
428,  These  two  sections  appear  in  Senate  Bill  No.  428  but 
refer  to  other  matters. 

Senate  Bill  No.  428  carries  no  provision  for  the  appoint- 
ment of  treasurers  or  stewards  or  providing  for  their  duties 
nor  does  it  provide  that  the  treasurer  shall  be  bonded.  How- 
ever, on  page  6,  Section  10858,  line  4,  there  is  a  reference  to 
the  "treasurer  of  such  institution."  If  there  are  to  be  treas- 
urers of  these  institutions  I  believe  Senate  Bill  No.  428  should 
so  state  and  they  should  be  bonded.  If  there  are  to  be  no 
treasurers  then  in  my  opinion  the  reference  to  the  treasurer 
of  such  institution  in  Section  10858  of  Senate  Bill  No.  428 
should  be  stricken  out. 

If  the  bill  intended  to  abolish  the  position  of  steward  at 
these  institutions  I  believe  this  should  be  made  clear.  On  the 
other  hand,  if  a  steward  is  to  be  employed,  in  my  opinion, 
his  duties  should  be  set  out  in  the  bill. 

In  Section  10862,  page  7,  lines  7  to  12  inclusive  the  fol- 
lowing proviso  should  be  stricken  out: 

"Provided,  however,  that  the  members  of  the  pres- 
ent boards  of  managers  of  the  Missouri  School  for  the 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  445 

Deaf  at  Fulton  and  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind  at 
St.  Louis  shall  become  the  first  boards  of  advisors  and 
hold  their  office  until  the  expiration  of  the  terms  for 
which  they  were  appointed." 

Under  the  Constitution  the  Legislative  Department  of 
the  State  government  has  no  authority  to  make  appointments 
to  office  or  designate  the  term  of  any  particular  officer. 

I  suggest  that  a  bill  be  introduced  in  line  with  the  above 
suggestions. . 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY  28,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  28,  1946. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Substitute  No.  2  for  House  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  318,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  14098,  14099,  14100,  14103, 
14104,  14105,  14106,  14108,  14113,  14114,  14119,  14120, 
14121,  14123,  14124,  14127  and  14128,  of  Article  6,  Chap- 
ter 102,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to 
the  Missouri  Dairy  Law,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  new 
sections  to  be  similarly  numbered,  pertaining  to  the  same 
subject  matter." 

On  May  28,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Substitute  No. 
2  for  House  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  318. 


446  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

House  Substitute  No.  2  for  House  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  318  repeals  seventeen  sections  of  the  1939  Revised 
Statutes  relating  to  the  Missouri  Dairy  Law  and  enacts  in 
lieu  thereof  new  sections  to  be  similarly  numbered  pertaining 
to  the  same  subject  matter.  There  was  no  Section  14128A 
contained  in,  the  1939  Revised  Statutes,  and  therefore,  this  sec- 
tion could  not  have  been  repealed  by  the  substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  318.  The  title  to  the  substitute  for  House  Bill  No. 
318  does  not  include  Section  14128A.  The  title  to  the  sub- 
stitute for  House  Bill  No.  318  enacts  new  sections  in  lieu  of 
the  sections  repealed  and  similarly  numbers  them.  Section 
14128A  cannot  be  included  in  this  language  since  it  is  not  in 
lieu  of  an  old  section  which  carries  that  number  and  is  not 
numbered  similarly  to  any  such  old  section.  I  believe  that 
Section  14 128 A  as  found  on  page  23  of  the  substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  318  is  beyond  the  scope  of  said  title. 

Section  14128A  provides  that  cheese  shall  be  deemed  to 
be  misbranded  if  certain  conditions  stated  therein  exist.  For 
instance,  in  paragraph  6,  line  20,  if  it  does  not  contain  the 
word  "pasteurized."  Suppose  cheese  was  received  from  the 
State  of  Wisconsin  by  a  merchant  in  Missouri  and  the  cheese 
does  not  contain  the  word  "pasteurized,"  how  could  the  Com- 
missioner of  Agriculture  enforce  the  violation  of  this  section? 
The  only  penalty  section  in  the  Missouri  Dairy  Law  is  Sec- 
tion 14130,  which  makes  it  a  misdemeanor  to  violate  any  pro- 
visions of  this  law.  How  could  that  misdemeanor  section  be 
enforced  against  a  cheese  manufacturer  in  Wisconsin  or  in  any 
other  state?  Said  Section  14130  also  provides  that  if  there 
is  a  violation  of  this  law  the  license  of  the  person  shall  be  sub- 
ject to  suspension  or  revocation  by  the  Commissioner.  The 
Wisconsin  cheese  manufacturer  does  not  have  to  have  a  license 
to  do  business  in  Missouri. 

In  paragraph  7,  lines  21  to  23,  cheese  shall  be  deemed  to 
be  misbranded  if  it  contains  a  symbol  or  identifying  code 
number  which  has  not  been  filed  with  the  Department  of 
Agriculture.  Suppose  the  Wisconsin  cheese  manufacturer  has 
not  filed  with  the  Department  of  Agriculture  a  Missouri  iden- 
tifying code  number.  How  could  the  Missouri  Commissioner 
of  Agriculture  enforce  that  provision?  In  other  words,  there 
is  no  method  provided  in  this  bill  to  enforce  any  of  the  pro- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  447 

visions  of  Section  14128A  even  if  this  section  were  within  the 
scope  of  the  title  of  the  act. 

This  section  discriminates  against  a  Missouri  cheese 
manufacturer  and  in  favor  of  a  non-resident  cheese  manu- 
facturer. It  requires,  for  instance,  that  the  Missouri  cheese 
manufacturer  shall  have  an  identifying  code  number  which 
shall  be  filed  with  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  or  that  the 
product  shall  contain  the  word  "pasteurized"  or  other  pro- 
visions set  out  in  the  section,  but  these  same  provisions  could 
not  be  enforced  against  a  non-resident  of  Missouri  selling 
cheese  in  Missouri. 

I  think  it  is  not  only  outside  the  scope  of  the  title  of  this 
act  but  that  it  will  cause  endless  confusion  in  trying  to  enforce 
the  provisions  of  it. 

The  other  sections  of  the  bill  seem  to  be  a  forward  step 
in  improving  the  provisions  of  the  Missouri  Dairy  Law  and 
for  that  reason  I  have  approved  this  bill.  However,  I  believe 
that  a  bill  should  be  introduced  striking  out  Section  14128A 
for  the  reasons  above  set  forth. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3840 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFEBSQN  CITY, 
June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

John  0.  Price,  1528  Locust  Street,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  State  Board  of  Accountancy,  for 


448  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946,  and  ending  July  1,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
R.  S.  Warner,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate,  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Walter  E.  Bryan,  5915  De  Giverville,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
professional  engineer,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of 
Registration  for  Architects  and  Professional  Engineers,  for  a 
term  ending  October  29,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Wesley  W.  Homer,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  449 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
•June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Charles  F.  Quinlin,  405  South  Main  Street,  Hannibal, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Barber  Examiners, 
for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  John  Gartner,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate ,  pp.  3841-384% 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
•June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Cliff  G.  Scruggs,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University  of  Missouri, 
for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1952,  and  until  his  successor  is 
duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 


450  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Joseph  D,  Elliff,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University  of  Missouri,  for  a 
term  ending  January  1,  1952,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  A.  W.  Fox,  Hannibal,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University  of  Missouri,  for 
a  term  ending  January  1,  1952,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Harry  S.  Blackiston,  term 
expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  p.  $842 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  Joseph  Little,  Lebanon,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  State  Board  of  Optometry,  for  a  term  beginning  June  30, 
1946,  and  ending  June  30,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is 
duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  Charles  Howard, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  451 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3842 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Clarence  F.  Wernel,  3629  West  Roanoke  Drive,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  for 
a  term  commencing  July  2,  1946,  and  ending  July  2,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reapp  ointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  19,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p,  $8J>S 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  19,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J.  Ed.  Rutter,  Shelbina,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Soil  Districts  Commission,  for  a  term  ending  three  years 


452  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  J.  E.  Noll, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Jvwrnal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  $884-8886 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEESON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office : 

Doctor  George  B.  Clark,  706  Ambassador  Building,  St, 
Louis,  Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Chiropody,  for  a  term  of  one  year  from  July  1,  1946,  and 
until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  C.  Milton  Stewart,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  Re- 
publican, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropody,  for 
a  term  of  two  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  L.  A.  Hansen,  1912  East  36th  Street,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  Republican,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of 
Chiropody,  for  a  term  of  three  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and 
until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  Harold  M.  Plaster,  Joplin,  Missouri,  Democrat, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropody,  for  a  term  of 
four  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  ap- 
pointed and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  453 


TO  THE  SENATE: 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3885 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Thomas  E.  Whitecotton,  Huntington,  Rails  County,  Mis- 
souri, as  the  Director  of  the  Department  of  Corrections,  for 
a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946;  said  term  of  office  shall  be 
at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate ,  p.  $885 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Michael  J.  Carroll,  8741  White  Avenue,  Brentwood,  St, 
Louis  County,  Missouri,  as  Director  of  the  Division  of  Employ- 
ment Security  of  the  Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial 


454  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Relations,  for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946;  said  term  of 
office  shall  be  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3886 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  R.  M.  James,  Joplin,  Missouri,  as  Director  of 
Health,  Division  of  Health  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health 
and  Welfare,  for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M-  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  455 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3886 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  &TATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Lon  N.  Irwin,  2715  Monterey  Street,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri, 
as  Director  of  the  Division  of  Industrial  Inspection  of  the 
Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations,  for  a  term  of 
four  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  ap- 
pointed and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  3887 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  -JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Doctor  Edwin  C,  White,  3232  Euclid,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Boatd  of  Medical 
Examiners,  for  a  term  of  one  year  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 


456  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Doctor  Howard  B.  Goodrich,  Hannibal,  Missouri,  Repub- 
lican, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners, 
for  a  term  of  one  year 'from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  W.  0.  Finney,  Chaffee,  Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners,  for  a  term 
of  two  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  Frank  H.  Rose,  Albany,  Missouri,  Republican,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners,  for  a 
term  of  two  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  Ralph  A.  Kinsella,  4376  Westminster,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medi- 
cal Examiners,  for  a  term  of  three  years  from  July  1,  1946, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  Walter  S.  Sewell,  Springfield,  Missouri,  Republi- 
can, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners, 
for  a  term  of  three  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3887^3888 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  457 

M.  E.  Morris,  Trenton,  Missouri,  as  Director  of  the  De- 
partment of  Revenue,  for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946; 
said  term  of  office  shall  be  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor. 

G.  H.  Bates,  Lexington,  Missouri,  as  State  Collector  of 
Revenue,  Division  of  Collection  of  the  Department  of  Reve- 
nue, for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  appointed  and  qualified. 

E.  G.  Armstrong,  3839  East  62nd  Street,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  Comptroller  and  Director  of  the  Budget,  Division 
of  the  Budget  and  Comptroller  of  the  Department  of  Reve- 
nue, for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Wm.  L.  Smith,  Normandy,  St.  Louis  County,  Missouri, 
as  State  Purchasing  Agent,  Division  of  Procurement  of  the 
Department  of  Revenue,  for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  S888 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  S^TATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Proctor  N.  Carter,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  Director  of 
Welfare,  Division  of  Welfare  of  the  Department  of  Public 


458  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Health  and  Welfare,  for  a  term  commencing  July  1,  1946, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  8888 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  ESTATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Miss  Grace  Frauens,  5702  Eastwood,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars 
of  Nurses,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1948,  and  until  her  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Coriixne  Hamilton, 
resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  459 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  20,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate^  p.  3889 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  20,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Charles  C.  Keith,  Joplin,  Missouri,  as  Director  of  the  Divi- 
sion of  Mine  Inspection  of  the  Department  of  Labor  and  In- 
dustrial Relations,  for  a  term  of  four  years  from  July  1,  1946, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  25,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  3944-3945 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEKSON  CITY, 
June  25,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Carl  J.  Henry,  Democrat,  Butler,  Bates  County,  Mis- 
souri, who  is  licensed  to  practice  law  in  the  State  of  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Industrial  Commission  of  Missouri  of  the 


460  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations  to  represent 
the  public,  for  a  term  of  six  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Ralph  W.  Atkeson,  Republican,  Salem,  Dent  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Industrial  Commission  of  Mis- 
souri of  the  Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations  to 
represent  employers,  for  a  term  of  four  years  from  July  1, 
1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Frank  J.  Lahey,  Democrat,  2812  St.  Vincent,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Industrial  Commission  of  Mis- 
souri of  the  Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations  to 
represent  employees,  for  a  term  of  two  years  from  July  1, 
1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

I  designate  Carl  J.  Henry  as  Chairman  of  the  Industrial 
Commission  of  Missouri  of  the  Department  of  Labor  and 
Industrial  Relations. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  25,  1946 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  p.  S94& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  Missoum,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
June  25,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Mrs.  Sally  Ball,  Joplin,  Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Board  of  Cosmetology,  for  a  term  of  two  years 
from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  her  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  461 

Mrs.  Leta  Kidwell,  Columbia,  Missouri,  Republican,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Board  of  Cosmetology,  for  a  term  of 
three  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  her  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Frank  J.  Vanek,  3637  South  Grand  Boulevard,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Cos- 
metology, for  a  term  of  four  years  from  July  1, 1946,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1946 
From  the  Jowmal  of  the  Senate,  p.  398$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26, 1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

W,  F,  Keyser,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  Commissioner  of  Fi- 
nance, Division  of  Finance  of  the  Department  of  Business  and 
Administration,  for  a  term  beginning  July  1, 1946,  and  ending 
at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  M.  E.  Morris,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


462  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  $982~S98S 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  OITY, 
June  26,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Everett  Keith,  Democrat,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  of  eight  years 
from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified. 

Charles  G.  Ross,  Republican,  Caruthersville,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  of 
seven  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Mrs.  True  Davis,  Democrat,  503  North  5th  Street,  St. 
Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  of  six  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  her 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified, 

John  H.  Flanigan,  Jr.,  Republican,  Carthage,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  of 
five  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  ap- 
pointed and  qualified. 

James  E.  Nugent,  Democrat,  701  East  70th  Terrace, 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of 
Education,  for  a  term  of  four  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and 
until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Mrs.  Chapin  S.  Newhard,  Republican,  Route  1,  Box  94, 
Clayton,  St.  Louis  County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State 
Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  of  three  years  from  July  1, 
1946,  and  until  her  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

J.  E.  Mitchell,  Democrat,  39  Lewis  Place,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  463 

term  of  two  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Ollin  Drennan,  Republican,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  of  one 
year  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  26,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  S984 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  26, 1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

William  Wildeboor,  Democrat,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri, 
as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division 
of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  of  six  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Mrs.  Mayme  H.  Ousley,  Republican,  St.  James,  Missouri, 
as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division 
of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  of  five  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  her  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Mrs.  Tom  Stark,  Democrat,  Louisiana,  Missouri,  as  a 
trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division  of 
Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  of  four  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  her  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 


464  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Fred  W.  Naeter,  Republican,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri, 
as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division 
of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  of  three  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Thomas  P.  Neill,  Democrat,  4372  Maryland,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools, 
Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Correc- 
tions, for  a  term  of  two  years  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

John  Thornberry,  Republican,  61  Janssen  Place,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training 
Schools,  Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of 
Corrections,  for  a  term  of  one  year  from  July  1,  1946,  and  until 
his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate^  p.  400& 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFEBSON  Cmr, 
June  27, 1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  June  20,  1946,  I  appointed  Doctor  Ralph  A.  Kinsella, 
St*  Louis,  Missouri,  and  Doctor  Frank  H,  Rose,  Albany,  Mis- 
souri, as  members  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners, 

Doctor  Kinsella  has  advised  me  that  he  is  unable  to  serve 
on  this  Board*  There  was  an  error  made  in  designating  the 
politics  of  Doctor  Rose.  So,  therefore,  I  wish  to  withdraw 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  465 

from  your  consideration  the  names  of  Doctor  Ralph  A.  Kin- 
sella  and  Doctor  Frank  H.  Rose  and  submit  to  you  the  fol- 
lowing appointments,  subject  to  the  consent  and  approval  of 
the  Senate: 

Doctor  Harry  A.  Klein,  Democrat,  5074  North  Union 
Boulevard,  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State 
Board  of  Medical  Examiners,  for  a  term  of  three  years  from 
July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Doctor  Paul  A.  Knepper,  Republican,  2002  Ashland  Ave- 
nue, St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Medical  Examiners,  for  a  term  of  two  years  from  July  1, 
1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4002 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27, 1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  Orr  Mullinax,  3315  Frederick  Avenue,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  Director  of  the  Division  of  Mental  Diseases, 
Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  for  a  term  com- 
mencing July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified. 

Respectfully  aubmitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


466  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  27,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4003 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  27,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Spencer  H.  Givens,  Higginsville,  Missouri,  as  Director  of 
the  Division  of  Workmen's  Compensation  of  the  Department 
of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations,  for  a  term  of  four  years 
from  July  1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SEN  ATE 

JUNE  28,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  Cn% 
June  28,  1946, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  am  advised  by  W.  F.  Keyser,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  in  a 
letter  dated  June  28,  1946,  that  because  of  circumstances  be- 
yond his  control  he  is  of  the  opinion  that  it  would  be  inadvis- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  467 

able  for  him  to  serve  as  Commissioner  of  Finance  of  the  State 
of  Missouri,  and,  therefore,  declined  in  writing  to  serve  as 
Commissioner  of  Finance. 

In  view  of  the  refusal  of  the  said  W.  F.  Keyser  to  serve 
as  Commissioner  of  Finance,  and  the  fact  that  he  has  not 
taken  the  oath  of  office  and  has  not  been  sworn  in  as  Com- 
missioner of  Finance,  I  submit  for  your  consideration  and 
approval  the  appointment  of  Harry  G.  Shaffner,  Louisiana, 
Missouri,  in  place  of  W.  F.  Keyser,  as  Commissioner  of  Fi- 
nance, Division  of  Finance  of  the  Department  of  Business  and 
Administration,  for  a  term  beginning  July  1,  1946,  and  ending 
at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  M.  E.  Morris,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  30,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  $988 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  30,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

0,  J.  Creach,  Democrat,  Camdenton,  Camden  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole, 
Department  of  Corrections,  for  a  term  of  six  years  from  July 
1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified, 

J.  0.  Dotson,  Republican,  Irondale,  Washington  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole, 
Department  of  Corrections,  for  a  term  of  four  years  from  July 
1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 


468  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Eugene  W.  Couey,  Democrat,  Sedalia,  Pettis  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Probation  and  Parole, 
Department  of  Corrections,  for  a  term  of  two  years  from  July 
1,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4115 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  6,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  200,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Section  13404  of  Article  2,  Chapter  99, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  fees  of 
probate  judges  and  the  amount  they  are  entitled  to  retain 
as  their  compensation,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new 
section  relating  to  fees  to  be  charged  and  collected  in 
probate  proceedings  and  the  manner  of  accounting  for  the 
same,  and  to  provide  for  bonds  of  probate  judges,  to  be 
known  as  Section  13404,  with  effective  date  provided." 

On  July  6,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  200. 

However,  I  call  attention  to  the  words  "state  treasurer" 
on  page  4,  line  80  of  Section  13404.  I  am  of  the  opinion  that 
this  should  be  "director  of  revenue." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  469 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  6,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  'JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  6,  1946. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  484,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  10918  of  Article  2,  Chapter  73, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  county 
clerk's  serving  as  budget  officer  in  counties  having  a  popu- 
lation, of  more  than  50,000  and  less  than  80,000  inhabit- 
ants; and  Section  10922  to  Section  10934,  both  inclu- 
sive, of  Article  2,  Chapter  73,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  the  presiding  judge  serving  as 
budget  officer,  the  annual  budget,  the  borrowing  of  money 
in  anticipation  of  the  collection  of  taxes  by  the  county 
court,  the  execution  of  contracts,  and  the  liability  of  cer- 
tain officers  in  counties  having  a  population  of  more  than 
80,000  inhabitants  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  fourteen 
new  sections  relating  to  the  same  subject  in  counties  of 
the  second  class,  providing  that  bids  need  not  be  taken 
on  purchases  of  twenty-five  dollars  or  less  made  from  any 
one  person,  firm  or  corporation  during  any  period  of 
thirty  days,  and  authorizing  the  county  court  to  revise 
the  1946  budget,  to  be  known  as  Sections  10922,  10923, 
10924,  10925,  10926,  10927,  10928,  10929,  10930,  10931, 
10932,  10933,  10934,  and  10934a»  with  an  emergency 
clause," 

On  July  6,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  484. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

I  am  of  the  opinion,  that  the  words  "state  board  of  equali- 


470  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

zation"  on  page  7,  line  25,  Section  10927,  should  be  the  "state 
tax  commission." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  18,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  935,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  10919  of  Article  2,  Chapter  73, 
of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by 
an  Act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly  and  approved  by 
the  Governor  on  August  7,  1941,  and  appearing  in  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1941,  at  Page  649,  relating  to  the  establish- 
ment of  the  office  of  county  comptroller  and  the  election 
of  such  officer  in  certain  counties,  and  also  to  repeal  Sec- 
tions 10920,  and  10921,  of  Article  2,  Chapter  73,  of  the 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  powers 
and  duties  of  the  budget  officer  and  accounting  officer 
under  the  county  budget  law  in  certain  counties,  and  to 
enact  in  lieu  thereof  five  new  sections  providing  for  the 
appointment  of  a  county  auditor  in  counties  of  the  first 
class  and  prescribing  the  duties,  powers,  and  responsi- 
bilities of  such  county  auditor  under  the  county  budget 
law,  to  be  known  as  Sections  10919a,  10920, 10921, 10921a 
and  10921b,  with  an  emergency  clause/* 

On  July  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  935. 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following; 


GOVERNOR.  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  471 

On  page  2,  Section  1,  lines  5  and  6,  the  words  "be  and 
the  same  is  hereby  repealed  effective  as  of  the  1st  day  of  Jan- 
uary, 1947,"  refer  to  Section  10919  of  Article  2,  Chapter  73, 
of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an 
act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly  and  approved  by  the  Gov- 
ernor on  August  7,  1941,  appearing  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941, 
at  page  649.  The  above  quoted  provision  does  not  appear 
in  the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  935. 

On  page  2,  Section  1091 9a,  lines  2a,  3,  and  4,  refer  to 
Sections  10925  to  10933,  both  inclusive,  of  Article  2,  Chapter 
73,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939.  These  sections 
were  repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  484  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  approved  on  July  6,  1946. 

On  page  6,  Section  10921b,  line  9,  the  word  "date"  should 
be  "data." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  18,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFBBSON  CITY, 
July  18,  1946, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No,  339,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section,  5728  of  an  Act  of  the  62nd  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  approved  April  29,  1944,  appearing  at 
pages  45  to  48  inclusive  of  the  Session  Laws  of  Missouri, 
Extraordinary  Session  1944,  relating  to  the  annual  license 
fee  on  motor  carriers  for  the  transportation  of  persons 


472  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

t 

and  property  and  enacting  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section 
to  be  known  as  Section  5728  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter." 

On  July  18,  1946,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  339. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  on 
page  5,  lines  117  and  118,  reference  is  made  to  Section  8369, 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  pages  664  to  666,  both  inclusive.  Said 
Section  8369  was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No. 
360  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  approved  on  April  30,  1946. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  23,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  4708 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  23,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir :   I  hand  you  herewith  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Bill^No.  214,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  create  a  County  Aid  Road  Fund  to  receive 
appropriations  by  the  General  Assembly  from  the  Mis- 
souri Post-War  Reserve  Fund  for  the  purpose  of  aiding 
and  assisting  in  the  improvement,  construction,  recon- 
struction and  restoration  of  county  roads;  to  provide  for 
the  apportionment  of  said  funds  to  the  several  counties 
of  the  State;  to  provide  for  the  formulation  by  the  State 
Highway  Commission  and  a  committee  of  five  (5)  county 
judges  appointed  by  the  Governor  of  general  plans,  speci- 
fications and  minimum  requirements  for  the  improvement, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  473 

construction,  reconstruction  and  restoration  of  county 
roads  with  the  use  of  said  funds;  to  provide  for  the  selec- 
tion of  the  county  roads  to  be  improved,  constructed,  re- 
constructed and  restored  with  the  use  of  said  funds;  to 
define  'County  Roads'  as  used  in  this  Act;  to  provide  for 
the  manner  in  which  any  county  may  avail  itself  of  the 
benefits  of  this  Act;  to  provide  for  the  adoption  of  a  pro- 
gram by  the  county  court  of  county  road  improvements 
and  the  adoption  of  plans  and  specifications  for  the  proj- 
ects included  in,  said  program;  to  provide  for  the  setting 
aside  of  a  specified  portion  of  said  funds  appropriated  to 
the  County  Aid  Road  Fund  by  the  State  Treasurer  upon 
approval  of  the  State  Highway  Commission  of  the  pro- 
gram and  the  plans  and  specifications  submitted  by  any 
county;  to  provide  for  the  awarding  of  contracts  for,  and 
the  improvement,  construction,  reconstruction  and  res- 
toration of,  county  roads  by  competitive  bidding  or  other- 
wise; and  to  provide  for  the  time  and  manner  of  making 
payments  out  of  the  said  funds  to  the  county." 

On  July  23,  1946,  I  approved  said  Committee  Substitute 
for  House  Bill  No.  214. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
On  page  5,  Section  4,  line  18,  I  am  of  the  opinion  that  the 
words  "State  Auditor"  should  be  "comptroller";  also,  on  page 
6,  Section  6,  lines  23  and  24,  the  words  "State  Auditor" 
should  be  "comptroller." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


474  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  31,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4139 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  31,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

W.  F.  Keyser,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Per- 
sonnel Advisory  Board,  Personnel  Division  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term  of  six  years 
from  July  31,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified. 

L.  C.  Deason,  Hannibal,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Personnel  Advisory  Board,  Personnel  Division  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term  of  four 
years  from  July  31,  1946,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified. 

Paul  G.  Steinbicker,  1304  Boland  Place,  St  Louis  County, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Personnel  Advisory  Board, 
Personnel  Division  of  -the  Department  of  Business  and  Admin- 
istration, for  a  term  of  two  years  from  July  31,  1946,  and 
until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  475 


TO  THE  SENATE 

'SEPTEMBER   16,   1946 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate ,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  16,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Samuel  Marsh,  35  East  55th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  Director  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 
Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his 
appointment  and  qualification  or  until  his  successor  is  ap- 
pointed and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  1,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  1,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

H.  Sam  Priest,  4621  Maryland  Avenue,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 


476  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1949, 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Mark  D.  Eagleton,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  14,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  14,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Hampton  S.  Chambers,  President  Hotel,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners 
for  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Fred  H, 
Olaader,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  477 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

OCTOBER  14,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  4793 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  14,  1946. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  1034,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  for  postwar  purposes  and 
providing  that  said  money  be  transferred,  credited  and 
set  apart  to  the  postwar  reserve  fund,  with  an  emergency 
clause." 

On  October  14,  1946, 1  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  1034. 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following:  In 
Section  1,  line  7,  reference  to  House  Bill  No.  15  should  be 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  15.  In  line 
8,  the  date  May  30,  1945,  should  be  January  25,  1946.  How- 
ever, I  do  not  believe  that  this  error  affects  the  validity  of 
the  bill 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10, 1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p* 


OFFIC»,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
'December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


478  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Ray  F.  McCarthy,  No.  6  Warson  Terrace,  St.  Louis 
County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Advisory  Coun- 
cil, as  provided  for  in  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  459  of  the  63rd  General  Assem- 
bly, for  a  term  ending  two  years  from  the  time  of  his  appoint- 
ment and  confirmation. 

Doctor  Emmett  F.  Hoctor,  Farmington,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  459  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending 
two  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  confirmation. 

Nell  Morgan,  Independence,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  State  Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in  Senate  Com- 
mittee Substitute  for  House  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  459, 
of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending  two  years 
from  the  time  of  her  appointment  and  confirmation. 

L,  0.  Wallis,  R.  F.  D.  No.  5,  Springfield,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  459  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending 
two  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  confirmation. 

Mrs.  Paul  Palmer,  Ethlyn,  Lincoln  County,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Substitute  for  House 
Bill  No.  459  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending 
two  years  from  the  time  of  her  appointment  and  confirmation* 

0.  V.  Jackson,  Rolla,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State 
Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  House  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  459  of  the 
63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending  two  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  confirmation. 

Everett  Johns,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Advisory  Council,  as  provided  for  in  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No-  459  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly,  for  a  term  ending  two  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  confirmation. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  479 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4238 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

John  M.  Schaper,  architect,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects 
and  Professional  Engineers,  Division  of  Registration  and 
Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term 
ending  October  29,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Harry  Satterlee  Bill,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Jwurnol  of  the  Senate,  p*  4&S8 


OFFKMB,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 


480  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Bert  Cooper,  Maryville,  Missouri,  as  Director  of  the 
Department  of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term  con- 
current with  that  of  the  Governor  and  until  his  successor  is 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Mrs.  J.  Henry  Patton,  Lebanon,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Library  Advisory  Board,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  of  four  years  from  the  time  of  her 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  her  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified. 

Mrs.  George  A.  Rozier,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Library  Advisory  Board,  State  Depart- 
ment of  Education,  for  a  term  of  two  years  from  the  time  of 
her  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  her  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  481 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4289 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  D.  W.  McKinnon,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  Division  of  Registra- 
tion and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a 
term  ending  October  16,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

3To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

J*  Ed*  May,  Gray  Summit,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Trustees,  Fruit  Experiment  Station,  State  De- 


482  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

partment  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  C.  W.  Cleveland, 
term  expired. 

Edwin  J.  Stark,  Louisiana,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Trustees,  Fruit  Experiment  Station,  State  Depart- 
ment of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from  the  time 
of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor 
shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Frank  D,  Connett, 
term,  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4840 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  C.  C.  Chesterson,  5709  Holly  Hills,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Advisors  of  the  Mis- 
souri School  for  the  Blind,  State  Department  of  Education, 
for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment 
and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed 
and  Qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNTEXXY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  483 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  4241 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

George  Burns,  Republican,  Appleton  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Central  Missouri  State 
College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor 
is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Roy  W.  Starling,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

DECEMBER  10,  1946 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p* 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
December  10,  1946. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  hav®  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Fred  V*  Heinkel,  Robertsville,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  State  Soils  Districts  Commission,  State  Department  of 


484  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Education,  for  a  term  ending  November  15,  1949,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappoint- 
ment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY  8,  1947 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Houae  of  Representatives,  p.  1 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

January  8,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

It  being  shown  to  the  Governor  that  the  Honorable 
Wilson  Bell,  Secretary  of  State  of  Missouri,  on  account  of 
illness,  will  be  unable  to  be  present  at  the  opening  of  the 
Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  of  Missouri; 

NOW,  THEREFORE,  pursuant  to  Section  12852  of  the  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  I  hereby  appoint  and  desig- 
nate the  Honorable  Albert  M*  Clark,  Judge  of  the  Supreme 
Court,  to  call  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly  of  Missouri  together  at  twelve  o'clock, 
noon,  on  Wednesday,  January  8,  1947,  and  to  preside  over 
its  deliberations  until  a  temporary  organization  shall  have 
been  effected. 

Dated  this  8th  day  of  January,  1947. 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  485 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

FEBRUARY  5,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hon.se  of  Representatives,  pp.  177-1T9 


To  the  Members  of  the  64th  General  Assembly: 

In  compliance  with  Section  24,  Article  IV  of  the  1945 
Constitution,  I  submit  herewith  the  Executive  Budget  for  the 
biennium  1947-1949. 

On  page  1  there  is  a  statement  of  the  General  Revenue 
for  the  period  commencing  January  1,  1945,  to  June  30,  1947, 
inclusive.  This  statement  shows  an  estimated  balance  as  of 
June  30,  1947,  of  $14,679,572.17.  From  this  amount  should 
be  deducted  any  emergency  appropriations  made  by  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  for  the  remainder  of  the  1946-1947 
fiscal  year. 

On  pages  4  to  6,  inclusive,  are  shown  the  receipts  into 
the  ordinary  Revenue  Fund  for  the  years  1943,  1944,  the  first 
six  months  of  1945,  the  fiscal  year  1945-1946,  the  estimated 
receipts  for  the  fiscal  year  1946-1947,  and  the  estimated  re- 
ceipts for  the  1947-1949  biennium.  On  page  6  are  shown  the 
total  estimated  receipts  in  the  ordinary  Revenue  Fund  for  the 
biennium  1947-1949  in  the  sum  of  $154,668,016.07.  From 
this  amount  should  be  deducted  certain  items,  such  as  Public 
Service  Commission  fees,  National  Forest  Timber  Sales,  Sales 
of  Court  Reports,  and  similar  fees,  in  the  sum  of  $613,000.00, 
leaving  a  balance  of  $154,055,016.07.  If  one-third  of  this 
amount  is  set  aside  and  appropriated  to  the  Public  School 
Fund,  as  has  been  done  in  previous  years,  said  one-third  will 
be  $51,351,672.02,  which  amount  deducted  from  $154,055,- 
016,07  will  leave  $102,703,344.05  plus  the  above  deductible 
items  in  the  sum  of  $613,000.00,  making  a  total  of  $103,316,- 
344*05,  which  amount  represents  the  net  estimated  General 
Revenue  receipts  available  for  the  biennium,  1947-1949  after 
one-third  has  been  deducted  for  the  Public  School  Fund, 

On  page  2  of  the  Budget  is  a  summary  of  the  requests 
from  all  State  departments  for  appropriations  for  the  1947- 


486  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

1949  biennium  from  General  Revenue  in  the  total  sum  of 
$134,863,537.68. 

In  order  to  balance  the  Budget  and  keep  the  expenditures 
within  the  anticipated  revenue,  I  have  recommended  expendi- 
tures for  the  1947-1949  biennium  from  the  General  Revenue 
Fund  in  the  sum  of  $101,657,186.00  as  appears  on  page  3  of 
the  Budget.  This  amount,  $101,657,186.00,  deducted  from 
$103,316,344.05  (Budget,  page  6),  will  leave  a  balance  of  $!,« 
659,158.05  from  the  anticipated  revenue  for  said  biennium. 

In  my  message  to  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  on 
January  8,  1947,  I  stated  there  should  be  an  estimated  bal- 
ance as  of  June  30,  1947,  of  $14,679,572.19.  From  this  amount 
should  be  deducted  any  emergency  appropriations  made  by 
the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  for  the  remainder  of  the 
1946-1947  fiscal  year. 

If  my  recommendations  for  expenditures  from  the  Gen- 
eral Revenue  Fund  for  the  biennium  1947-1949  are  followed 
there  should  be  a  balance  in  the  General  Revenue  Fund  on 
June  30, 1949,  of  approximately  $16,338,730.24.  (This  amount 
is  arrived  at  by  adding  $14,679,572.19  plus  $1,659,158.05  as 
above  mentioned.) 

The  above  recommended  expenditures  will  leave  a  bal- 
anced Budget  for  the  1947-1949  biennium.  These  recom- 
mendations are  only  advisory,  as  the  General  Assembly  has 
authority  to  make  such  changes  as  its  judgment  may  dictate* 

At  the  bottom  of  page  1  is  shown  a  summary  of  appro- 
priation bills  as  enacted  by  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
for  the  1945-1947  biennium  and  approved  by  the  Governor. 

On  pages  7  to  9,  inclusive,  are  shown  the  receipts  from 
the  various  State  and  Federal  funds  received  by  the  State 
Treasury  for  the  years  1943  to  July  1,  1946,  and  the  estimated 
receipts  for  the  fiscal  year  1946-1947  and  total  estimated 
receipts  for  the  biennium  1947-1949. 

There  has  been  transferred  to  the  Post  War  Fund  the 
sum  of  $30,000,000.00.  There  were  appropriations  enacted  by 
the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly  chargeable  against  this  sum 
in  the  amount  of  $8,829,500.33  (Budget,  page  1)  which  would 
leave  an  unappropriated  balance  of  $21,170,499,67  as  of  June 
30,  1947.  However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that 
only  the  sum  of  $158,065.27  has  been  paid  out  of  the  Post 
War  Fund  during  this  fiscal  year* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  487 

Section  24,  Article  IV  of  the  Constitution  of  1945  provides 
that  the  Governor  shall  make  recommendations  of  any  laws 
necessary  to  provide  revenue  sufficient  to  meet  the  expendi- 
tures. However,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  State  of  Mis- 
souri is  in  a  sound  financial  condition  and  the  anticipated 
revenues  should  be  sufficient  to  meet  the  expenditures  during 
the  ensuing  biennium,  such  recommendations  at  this  time  are 
unnecessary. 

It  is  deemed  advisable  to  call  to  the  attention  of  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  that  the  only  state  bond  obligation  consists  of 
the  outstanding  State  of  Missouri  Road  Bonds,  which  at  the 
close  of  the  present  fiscal  year,  June  30,  1947,  will  amount  to 
$53,000,000,00.  Nine  million  dollars  of  said  Road  Bonds  will 
become  due  during  the  1947-1949  biennium. 

However,  we  have  what  is  known  as  an  inter-fund  debt 
as  follows: 

Under  the  provisions  of  Sections  10881-10882,  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No. 
210  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly,  there  is  an  unfunded 
debt  consisting  of  Certificates  of  Indebtedness  issued  by  the 
State  of  Missouri  to  the  State  Public  School  Fund  amounting 
to  $3,159,000.00.  Annual  interest  of  $187,040.00  on  said  Cer- 
tificates of  Indebtedness  is  paid  by  transfer  from  the  State 
Interest  Fund  to  the  State  School  Moneys  Fund  for  distri- 
bution to  the  public  schools.  (The  interest  is  shown  on  page 
62  of  the  Budget  for  the  biennium.) 

There  are  also  Certificates  of  Indebtedness  issued  to  the 
State 'Seminary  Fund  amounting  to  $1,239,839.42.  Annual 
interest  of  $63,211,95  on  said  Certificates  of  Indebtedness  is 
paid  by  transfer  from  the  State  Interest  Fund  to  the  State 
Seminary  Moneys  Fund  to  be  applied  for  the  maintenance  of 
the  University  of  Missouri,  School  of  Mines  and  Metallurgy, 
and  the  James  S.  Rollins  University  scholarship.  (The  interest 
is  shown  on  page  62  of  the  Budget  for  the  biennium,) 

The  total  of  these  two  funds  amounts  to  $4,398,839.42, 

A  careful  study  of  the  facts  and  figures  contained  in  this 
message  will  reveal  the  need  for  economy  in,  the  expenditure 
of  State  funds.  It  will  be  noted  that  total  requests  for  appro- 
priations for  the  19474949  biennium  have  been  cut  almost 
twenty-five  per  cent  in  order  to  achieve  a  budget  total  in  bal- 


488  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

ance  with  total  anticipated  revenues  available  for  the  bieixnium. 
Any  major  disturbance  in  the  relationship  between  those  totals 
could  result  in  an  unbalanced  budget,  with  consequent  dipping 
into  reserves.  The  expenses  of  government  are  heavy.  At  the 
same  time,  prudent  management  and  businesslike  practices 
can  keep  those  expenses  within  bounds.  Missouri's  financial 
soundness  depends  upon  that  kind  of  administration  of  the 
business  of  the  State,  as  well  as  in  the  wise  and  careful  han- 
dling of  fiscal  affairs. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  19,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  291 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  19,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Herbert  I.  Sears,  Democrat,  LaPlata,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Northeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Roy  R.  Quinn,  Republican,  Moberly,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Northeast  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappomtment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  489 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  19,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  291 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  19,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

R,  E.  Bailey,  Republican,  Sikeston,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Southeast  Missouri  State 
College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Edu- 
cation, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reapp ointment. 

John  F.  Lottes,  Republican,  Perryville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Southeast  Missouri 
State  College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  re- 
appointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  19,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
February  19,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


490  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

T.  H.  Douglas,  Republican,  Bolivar,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Southwest  Missouri  State 
College,  Springfield,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reapp ointment. 
R.  W.  Anderson,  Republican,  Neosho,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Southwest  Missouri 
State  College,  Springfield,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Edu- 
cation, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Maurice  W.  Covert, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  5,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  $58 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEKSON  CITY, 
March  5,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Ben  H*  Howard,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as  Comptroller 
and  Director  of  the  Budget,  Division  of  the  Budget  and  Comp- 
troller of  the  Department  of  Revenue,  for  a  term  ending  at 
the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  E.  G*  Armstrong,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  491 


TO  THE  SENATE 

March  5,  1947. 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  S58 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  5,  1947. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office : 

Harold  F.  Thomson,  1718  Crescent  Drive,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  Feb- 
ruary 19,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAEGIX  5,  1947 
Frow  tk$  Journal  of  th$  $$n&t$t  #.  $$& 


EXECUTIVE  Omcjs,  STATE*  OF  MJMOUEX,  JIFFHSSON  Cmrt 
March  8,  1047, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  84th  Gemml  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

James  C*  Kirkpalrlek*  Democrat*  Jefferson  City,  Missouri, 
at  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Central  Missouri 


492  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

State  College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  J.  L.  Mann, 
term  expired. 

Earl  T.  Crawford,  Republican,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Central  Missouri 
State  College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Thos.  H. 
Yount,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  6,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  6,  1947, 

Hon.    Roy   D.    Miller,    Secretary   of   Senate,    Jefferson    City" 
Missouri: 

Dear  Senator  Miller; 

Please  convey  to  the  members  of  the  State  Senate  my 
sincere  appreciation  and  thanks  for  the  Resolution  which  they 
adopted  today,  and  for  the  beautiful  bouquet  of  flowers. 
With  best  wishes,  I  am 

Sincerely, 
PHIL  M*  DONNELLY. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  493 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  7,  1947 
the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  37$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  7,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Frank  Stonner,  Chamois,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Missouri,  State  Depart- 
ment of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  James 
A*  Potter,  term  expired. 

John  W.  Wolpers,  Poplar  Bluff,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Missouri,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reapp  ointment. 

Stratton  Shartel^  4235  Locust,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  the  University  of  Mis- 
souri, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  Jan- 
uary 1,  1953,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappomtment* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DOHNELLY, 
Governor- 


494  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  7,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  7,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  Vern  Paul  Grisham,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  Division  of  Regis- 
tration and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for 
a  term  ending  July  6,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  T,  T.  Umbarger, 
resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  11, 1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp* 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON 
March  11,  1947* 

To   the   Senate  of  the  64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Earl  E,  Young,  Lebanon,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Federal  Soldiers'  Home  at  St.  James* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  495 

Missouri,  Division  of  Welfare,  Department  of  Public  Health 
and  Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  0.  D.  Hall,  term  expired. 

C.  Cicero  Ogle,  Cuba,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Federal  Soldiers'  Home  at  St.  James, 
Missouri,  Division  of  Welfare,  Department  of  Public  Health 
and  Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  James  Bottomley,  term 
expired. 

Leo  W.  Highley,  Rolla,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Federal  Soldiers*  Home  at  St.  James, 
Missouri,  Division  of  Welfare,  Department  of  Public  Health 
and  Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of 
his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Harry  E.  Guth,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  12,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  th$  S®n&t$t  pp«  $$%«$$$ 


Bx»cwm&  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  Bbssotmx,  JSFFEESON 
March  12,  1047, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Miss  Ophelia  Mae  Perkins,  Springfield*  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars  of  Nurses, 


496  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1948,  and  until  her 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Miss  Luna 
Thomas,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  12,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE:  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  12,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J.  Frank  Hensley,  Fulton,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Advisors  for  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappomtment* 

Doctor  D.  P,  Dyer,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Advisors  for  the  Missouri  School  for  the  Dea£» 
State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  four  years 
from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification,  aiad  until 
his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  He&iy  C* 
Salveter,  term  expired* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  497 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  12,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate ,  p.  396 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  >STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  12,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  60,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  7889  of  Article  11,  Chapter  39, 
Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939,  relating  to  the 
original  incorporation  or  increasing  the  capital  of  any  cor- 
poration, and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  relat- 
ing to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Section 
7889." 

On  March  12,  1947,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  60, 
However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 
In  line  I  of  the  title.  Article  11  should  be  Article  1*    This 
same  error  appears  in  line  1  of  Section  L 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


498  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAKCH  27,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  &TATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  €ITY, 
March  27,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

M.  E.  Ford,  Democrat,  Maryville,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Northwest  Missouri  State 
Teachers  College,  Maryville,  Missouri,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  E.  C.  Curfmau, 
term  expired. 

A.  B.  Kemerer,  Republican,  Chillicothe,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Northwest  Missouri 
State  Teachers  College,  Maryville,  Missouri,  State  Depart- 
ment of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  M.  E. 
Morris,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  31,  1047 
From  the  Journal  of  the  S$naU>  p*  48$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JKFFUBSON 
March  81,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No*  112,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  499 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  10130  and  10132  of  an  Act  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  No.  146, 
approved  January  18,  1946,  and  to  repeal  Sections  10133 
and  10134,  Chapter  67,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  all  relating  to  the  State  Board  of  Barber  Examiners, 
and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  four  new  sections,  relating  to 
the  same  subject,  to  be  known  as  Sections  10130,  10132, 
10133  and  10134." 

On  March  31,  1947,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  112. 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  the 
words  "to  the  treasurer  of  said  board"  should  have  been 
stricken  out  of  line  27,  page  3,  Section  10132;  and  also  the 
words  "to  the  treasurer  of  the  board"  should  have  been  stricken 
out  of  lines  18  and  19,  page  5,  Section  10134.  These  words 
were  stricken  out  of  several  places  in  the  sections  contained  in 
Senate  Bill  No.  112  but  were  evidently  overlooked  in  the 
above  two  instances. 

However,  I  believe  the  proviso  in  lines  5  to  9,  inclusive, 
page  2,  Section  10130,  that  all  moneys  payable  under  this  act 
shall  be  collected  by  the  Division  of  Collection  in  the  Depart- 
ment of  Revenue  and  deposited  in  the  State  Treasury  to  the 
credit  of  a  Board  of  Barbers  fund,  will  govern* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SEN  ATE 

Aim  5,  1947 
Prom  tk$  Journal  of  tfa$  Sena£&>  pp*  8Q$«$Q& 


Off  1C®,  STATU  OF  If  KWOUBI,  JEFFIBSON  Cmr» 
April  S,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Mmouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No*  66f  entitled; 


500  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  8151  and  8170  of  Article  7, 
Chapter  39  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri  of  1939, 
relating  to  small  loan  companies,  and  to  enact  in  lieu 
thereof  two  new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter  to  be  known  as  Sections  8151  and  8170." 

On  April  5,  1947,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  66. 

Senate  Bill  No.  66  repeals  Sections  8151  and  8170,  Arti- 
cle 7,  Chapter  39,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relat- 
ing to  small  loan  companies  and  reenacts  in  lieu  thereof  two 
new  sections.  The  principal  changes  in  the  two  sections  are 
that  the  fees  for  licenses,  which  must  be  obtained  by  persons 
who  desire  to  engage  in  the  small  loan  business,  are  to  be 
collected  by  the  State  Collector  of  Revenue. 

The  Attorney  General  of  Missouri,  Honorable  J.  E*  Tay- 
lor, in  an  opinion  to  the  State  Commission  of  Finance  July  1, 
1946,  held  that  the  entire  small  loan  law,  which  is  found  in 
Article  7,  Chapter  39  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  is  unconstitutional  because  it  is  in  conflict  with  Section 
44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution. 

Said  Section  44,  Article  III  of  the  1945  Constitution  is 
as  follows; 

"Section  44.  No  law  shall  be  valid  fixing  rates  of  interest 
or  return  for  the  loan  or  use  of  money,  or  the  service  or 
other  charges  made  or  imposed  in  connection  therewith, 
for  any  particular  group  or  class  engaged  in  lending  money* 
The  rates  of  interest  fixed  by  law  shall  be  applicable  gen- 
erally and  to  all  lenders  without  regard  to  the  type  or 
classification  of  their  business." 

In  the  case  of  Crown,  Loan  Company  vs.  Shaffaer,  Com- 
missioner of  Finance*  in  the  Circuit  Court  of  Cole  County, 
Missouri,  in  July,  1946,  the  Crown  Loan  Company  contended 
that  Article  7,  Chapter  39,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri, 
1939,  was  in  full  force  and  effect  and  did  not  conflict  with  the 
Missouri  Constitution*  The  Commissioner  of  Finance  was 
represented  in  said  ease  by  the  Attorney  General  of  Missouri 
who  contended  that  said  Article  7t  Chapter  39,  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939,  was  unconstitutional*  which  conten- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  501 

tiou  was  sustained  by  the  Circuit  Court  of  Cole  County, 
Missouri. 

At  the  present  time  there  is  pending  in  the  Supreme 
Court  of  Missouri  the  case  of  Household  Finance  Company 
vs.  Shaffner,  Commissioner  of  Finance.  The  relator  in  this 
case  (Household  Finance  Company)  contends  that  Article  7, 
Chapter  39,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  is  still  in  full 
force  and  effect,  which  contention  is  denied  by  the  Commis- 
sioner of  Finance  who  is  represented  by  the  Attorney  General. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  all  of  Article  7,  Chapter  39,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  which  includes  the  two  sec- 
tions in  Senate  Bill  No.  66,  is  now  under  consideration  by  the 
Missouri  Supreme  Court  as  to  whether  or  not  said  Article  is 
constitutional,  I  £»m  of  the  opinion  that  I  should  approve  Sen- 
ate Bill  No.  66.  If  the  Supreme  Court  should  hold  that  said 
Article  7  is  unconstitutional  then  said  two  Sections,  8151  and 
8170,  likewise  would  be  unconstitutional  and  my  approval  of 
them  at  this  time  would  not  validate  them,  while  on  the  other 
hand  if  the  Supreme  Court  should  hold  that  said  Article  7  is 
constitutional  then  it  would  be  proper  for  said  two  sections 
to  be  enacted  into  law. 

With  this  explanation  I  am  approving  Senate  Bill  No.  66, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

APBIL  7» 1047 
From  the  Journal  of  th$  S$nat$t  pp> 


OPTICS,  STATE  OF  MXSSOUBX,  JEFIWSON  CITY, 
April  7,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  and  Home  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty-rfoarth 
General  Assembly: 

I  am  in  receipt  of  a  communication  from  Honorable  Dean 
Acheron,  Acting  Secretary  of  State,  containing  a  certified 


502  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

copy  of  a  resolution,  adopted  by  the  National  Congress  of  the 
United  States  during  the  First  Session  of  the  Eightieth  Con- 
gress, proposing  an  amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the 
United  States  entitled  "JOINT  RESOLUTION  Proposing  an  amend- 
ment to  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  relating  to  the 
terms  of  office  of  the  President,"  and  a  copy  of  Section  160, 
Title  5,  United  States  Code. 

I  transmit  to  you  herewith  this  Certified  Copy  of  Joint 
Resolution  and  copy  of  Section  160,  Title  5,  United  States 
Code,  in,  order  that  said  Resolution  may  receive  your 
consideration. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 

NO.  1505 

UNITED  STATES  OF  AMERICA 
DEPARTMENT  OF  STATE 

To  all  to  whom  these  presents  shall  come,  Greeting: 

I  Certify  That  the  copy  hereto  attached  is  a  true  copy  of 
a  resolution  of  Congress  entitled  "JOINT  RESOLUTION 
Proposing  an  amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States  relating  to  the  terms  of  office  of  the  President/'  the 
original  of  which  is  on  file  in  this  Department. 

In  testimony  whereof,  I,  Dean  Aeheson,  Acting 
Secretary  of  State,  have  hereunto  caused  the 
seal  of  the  Department  of  State  to  be  affixed 
(Seal)  and  my  name  subscribed  by  the  Authentication 

Officer  of  the  said  Department,  at  the  city  of 
Washington,  in  the  District  of  Columbia,  this 
twenty-fifth  day  of  March,  1047, 

DEAN  ACHESON 

Acting  Secretary  of  State. 

By  M.  P-  CHAUVIN 

Authentication  Officer, 

Department  of  Stat€. 
H*  J.  Res,  27. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  503 

EIGHTIETH)  CONGRESS  OF  THE  UNITED   STATES  OP 
AMERICA  AT  THE  FIRST  SESSION 

Begun  and  held  at  the  City  of  Washington  on,  Friday,  the  third 
day  of  January,  one  thousand  nine  hundred  and  forty-seven 


JOINT  RESOLUTION 

Proposing  an  amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States  relating  to  the  terms  of  office  of  the  President. 


Resolved  by  the  Senate  and  the  House  of  Representatives  of 
the  United  States  of  America  in  Congress  assembled  (two-thirds 
of  each  House  concurring  therein},  That  the  following  article 
is  hereby  proposed  as  an  amendment  to  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States,  which  shall  be  valid  to  all  intents  and  pur- 
poses as  part  of  the  Constitution  when  ratified  by  the  legis- 
latures of  three-fourths  of  the  several  States: 

-A.rt.lCl0     •—•:ir"--"inovuvr 

"Section  1*  No  person  shall  be  elected  to  the  office  of 
the  President  more  than  twice*  and  no  person  who  has  held 
the  office  of  President,  or  acted  as  President,  for  more  than 
two  years  of  a  term  to  which  some  other  person  was  elected 
President  shall  be  elected  to  the  office  of  the  President  more 
than  once.  But  this  Article  shall  not  apply  to  any  person 
holding  the  office  of  President  when  this  Article  was  proposed 
by  the  Congress,  and  shall  not  prevent  any  person  who  may 
be  holding  the  office  of  President,  or  acting  as  President,  dur- 
ing the  term  within  which  this  Article  becomes  operative  Irom 
holding  the  office  of  President  or  acting  as  President  during 
the  remainder  of  such  term, 

"Sec,  2.  This  article  shall  be  inoperative  unless  it  shall 
have  been  ratified  as  an  amendment  to  the  Constitution  by 
th©  legislatures  of  three-fourths  of  the  several  states  within 


504  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

seven  years  from  the  date  of  its  submission  to  the  States  by 
the  Congress." 

JOSEPH  W.  MARTIN,  JR. 

Speaker  of  the  House  of 

Representatives. 

WILLIAM  F.  KNOWLAND 
Acting  President  of  the 

Senate  pro  tempore. 

I  certify  that  this  Joint  Resolution  originated  in  the  House 
of  Representatives. 

JOHN  ANDREWS, 

Clerk. 

SECTION  160,  TITLE  5,  UNITED  STATES  CODE 

Whenever  official  notice  is  received  at  the  Department  of 
State  that  any  amendment  proposed  to  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States  has  been  adopted,  according  to  the  pro- 
visions of  the  Constitution,  the  Secretary  of  State  shall  forth- 
with cause  the  amendment  to  be  published,  with  his  certifi- 
cate, specifying  the  States  by  which  the  same  may  have  been 
adopted,  and  that  the  same  has  become  valid,  to  all  intents 
and  purposes,  as  a  part  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States, 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

Aim  15,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Home  of  Repr$mnt&tiw#t  pp. 


To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly: 

In  my  message  to  the  General  Assembly  delivered  on 
January  8,  1947, 1  made  this  statement  and  recommendation: 

"During  recent  years  labor  has  won  many  long  overdue 
rights  to  which  they  were  entitled*    The  right  of  ©m- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  505 

ployees  in  private  industry  to  organize  and  bargain  col- 
lectively through  representatives  of  their  own  choosing 
is  recognized  by  law  and  should  be  preserved.  But  all 
rights  carry  with  them  corresponding  responsibilities  and 
duties.  Labor  unions  should  recognize  and  live  up  to  these 
responsibilities,  and  should  be  held  legally  responsible  for 
their  contractual  obligations.  In  addition  I  recommend 
that  legislation  be  enacted  to  prevent  labor  strikes  which 
affect  the  lives,  health,  or  safety  of  the  general  public,  or 
challenge  the  sovereignty  of  the  State  government." 

Events  since  that  statement  was  made  emphasize  the  need 
to  re-state  the  principles  it  proclaims;  and  the  urgent  neces- 
sity of  legislative  action  to  protect  the  public  inteiest.  The 
times  demand  action  that  is  clear,  unequivocal,  and  effective. 

In  particular,  the  present  paralyzing  telephone  strike  has 
made  it  abundantly  evident  that  the  general  public  is  not 
protected  against  public  utility  strikes  that  threaten  the  very 
life  of  our  people.  That  is  the  kind  of  work  stoppage,  arbi- 
trary and  dangerous,  that  I  recommended  legislation  to  pre- 
vent* Such  strikes,  in  public  utilities  serving  essential  needs 
of  the  people,  strangling  the  business  of  the  State  and  Nation, 
endangering  the  health  and  safety  of  all  the  people,  placing 
the  interests  of  the  few  above  the  welfare  of  all,  are  intolerable. 

If  a  strike  or  lockout  in  a  utility  serving  the  vital  com- 
munication needs  of  the  public  can  take  place,  similar  curtail* 
mont  of  services  could  occur  in  public  utilities  providing  light,, 
power,  transportation,  and  other  services  absolutely  necessary 
to  tine  general  welfare*  Without  such  services,  hardship,  suf- 
fering, and  the  dangers  and  calamities  inherent  in  great  catas- 
trophies  could  occur.  The  people  should  not  be  exposed  to 
such  perils* 

Let  us  not  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  a  public  utility 
operates  under  a  franchise  or  certificate  issued  by  the  State* 
Our  statutes  clearly  define  the  obligations  and  duties  of  a 
public  utility,  and  provide  that  such  utility  must  not  suspend 
its  services.  The  utility  is  subject  to  severe  penalties,  even 
extending  to  loss  of  franchise  for  violation  of  this  statutory 
requirement*  A  work  stoppage  or  strike  in  such  a  utility  there* 
fora  has  the  effect  of  nullifying  the  statutes  of  Missouri,  and 
challenges  the  sovereignty  of  the  State.  If  a  utility  company 


506  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

cannot  disregard  the  public  welfare,  neither  should  its  em- 
ployees. The  same  yardstick  of  public  service  should  apply 
to  the  employee  as  to 'the  utility  itself.  A  walkout  of  the 
nature  of  the  telephone  strike  can  be  regarded,  therefore,  as 
a  strike  against  the  State  itself.  Thus  we  have  a  minority 
group,  acting  under  the  orders  and  leadership  of  men  who 
have  had  no  responsibility  conferred  upon  them  by  the  people, 
making  decisions  and  dictating  policies  which  abrogate  the 
laws  and  make  a  mockery  of  the  legislative  acts  of  the  elected 
representatives  of  the  people. 

The  dangers  inherent  in  this  situation  are  recognized 
throughout  the  nation,  and  in  some  states  legislation  has  been 
enacted  for  the  purpose  of  preventing  strikes  in  public  utilities, 
I  have  in  mind  two  states  in  which  recent  legislation  has 
proven  quite  effective.  In  those  states,  laws  were  enacted 
which,  while  differing  in  the  methods  of  handling  situations 
arising  from  disputes  between  public  utility  employers  and 
their  employees,  had  this  in  common:  Each  law  was  clear, 
vigorous,  and  enforceable.  There  is  no  telephone  strike  today 
in  those  states.  In  another  state  a  law  was  enacted  that  failed 
to  do  the  j  ob.  Only  after  emergency  amendments  were  adopted 
a  few  days  ago,  did  this  legislation  become  partially  effective. 
These  actions,  in  sister  states,  may  well  be  heeded  in  our 
efforts,  in  Missouri,  to  meet  this  urgent  problem. 

House  Bill  No.  180  has  been  introduced  in  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly.  The  purpose  of  this  bill  is  to  pre- 
vent strikes,  work  stoppages,  and  lockouts  in  public  utilities, 
but  in  its  form  as  perfected  it  is,  in  my  judgment,  ineffective 
and  unenforceable. 

The  original  House  Bill  No*  180  contained  Section  21, 
which  provided  penalties  for  violation  of  the  act  by  indi- 
viduals participating  in  a  strike  or  a  concerted  refusal  to  work 
but  this  section  was  removed  by  amendment  This,  or  a 
similar  section,  should  be  restored  to  this  bill 

In  addition*  the  bill,  to  be  effective,  should  expressly  for- 
bid lockouts,  strikes,  or  work  stoppages  in  public  utilities,  and 
should  provide  penalties  for  violation  thereof  by  either  the 
utility  or  the  labor  union* 

The  bill  seeks  to  provide  a  form  of  mediation*  but  gives 
no  assurance  it  would  succeed*  No  provision  is  contained 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  507 

which  would  enable  the  State,  after  having  taken  possession 
of  the  utility,  to  operate  such  utility,  since  there  is  no  authority 
to  prohibit  the  continuation  of  the  strike  by  the  members  of 
the  group  engaged  in  it,  and  no  penalties  are  provided  for  a 
contination  of  the  strike  after  the  State  has  taken  over. 

The  Governor,  under  this  bill,  could  make  "necessary 
rules  and  regulations  to  carry  out  the  provisions  of  this  Act," 
but  there  is  no  provision  in  the  bill  authorizing  the  Governor 
to  enforce  the  rules  and  regulations.  Furthermore,  such  pro- 
posed legislation,  even  when  it  authorizes  the  State  to  take 
possession  of  and  operate  a  utility,  does  not  contain  any  pro- 
vision which  would  provide  for  the  eventual  resumption  of 
such  service  to  the  public  by  the  utility. 

The  legislation  should  further  provide  that  courts  of  com- 
petent jurisdiction  shall  have  authority  to  enforce  by  injunc- 
tion.  the  provisions  of  such  legislation  during  the  time  the 
State  operates  the  utility. 

A  joint  and  concurrent  resolution  has  been  introduced  in 
the  General  Assembly  providing  for  an  amendment  to  the  Con- 
stitution that  would  prohibit  strikes  by  "public  employees." 
The  theory  of  the  sponsors  of  this  proposed  constitutional 
amendment  seems  to  be  that  if  adopted  the  utility  employees 
would  become  public  employees  if  the  operation  of  the  utility 
is  taken  over  by  the  State*  But  this  is  a  long  and  delaying 
procedure.  And  if  the  proposed  constitutional  amendment  is 
adopted  it  probably  would  require  the  enactment  of  legisla- 
tion to  make  it  operative, 

I  am  not  at  this  time  discussing  other  legislation  on  this 
subject  that  has  been  introduced  in  the  64th  General  Assem- 
bly* but  am  confining  these  statements  and  recommendations 
to  House  Bill  No-  180  solely  because  it  has  been  perfected 
and  has  been  made  a  special  order  of  business  for  third  read- 
ing and  final  passage  for  Wednesday,  April  16.  It  is  not  too 
late  to  reconsider  the  vote  by  which  this  bill  was  perfected 
and  amend  it  to  provide  for  the  recommendations  contained 
in  this  message* 

This  legislation  should  have  the  earnest,  courageous  atten- 
tion of  every  legislator  and  the  executive  alike*  It  should  not 
be  regarded  as  political*  nor  should  legislation  relating  to  this 
subject  be  introduced*  or  positions  be  taken,  with  political 


508  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

considerations  in  mind.  These  things  should  be  disregarded 
by  both  political  parties.  This  is  no  time  to  take  half-way 
measures,  or  to  count  the  votes. 

I  urge  that  legislation,  strong,  effective,  adequate  to  every 
emergency,  be  enacted.  I  recommend  that  this  great  service 
to  our  people  be  accomplished  by  this  General  Assembly, 
without  regard  to  politics  in  any  manner  whatever.  I  ask 
you  to  take  action  as  legislators  and  as  citizens  of  Missouri. 
Let  us  chart  our  course  down  the  road,  swerving  neither  to 
the  right  nor  to  the  left,  giving  to  the  people  that  protection 
and  safety  to  which  they  are  entitled. 

The  public's  rights  must  be  protected.  This  is  an  oppor- 
tunity to  re-state  those  rights,  and  to  reaffirm  them-  They 
shall,  and  must  be  preserved. 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 

Governor. 
April  15,  1947. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APBIL  17,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  S$n&tef  p,  598 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  17,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Andrew  E.  Mclnerney,  137  North  Lawn,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  the  Grain,  Warehouse  Commissioner  for  the  State 
of  Missouri  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the  time  of  hit 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice.  Turner  B,  Morton,  term  expired* 

Respectfully  submitted* 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY* 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  509 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

MAY  15,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1075-1076 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  15,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General 
Assembly  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  am  advised  that  additional  funds  are  needed  for  the 
fiscal  year  ending  June  30,  1947,  for  the  following  departments 
and  institutions  of  the  State  government: 

1.  The  Department  of  Education,  for  vocational  reha- 
bilitation services  to  the  disabled  and  handicapped  persons 
of  the  State  of  Missouri  in  order  to  meet  the  State's  obligations 
in  providing  services  to  the  handicapped  so  that  they  may  be 
trained  and  equipped  for  employment  in  worthy  occupations, 
the  sum  of  $35,000.00  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund. 

2,  The  Department  of  Education,  for  veterans  training 
in  meeting  the  State's  needs  for  inspecting  and  listing  educa- 
tional and  training  institutions  which  are  qualified  to  furnish 
training  for  returned  veterans,  the  sum  of  $12,000.00  charge- 
able to  the  General  Revenue  Fund.    It  is  my  understanding 
that  under  the  Federal  act  all  expenditures  for  personal  serv- 
ice and  travel  are  refunded  to  the  State;  however,  the  State 
must  first  make  the  expenditures  available  before  claim  can 
be  established  for  reimbursement, 

3*  The  Department  of  Education,  for  vocational  edu- 
cation, in  order  that  schools  may  be  reimbursed  for  providing 
vocational  courses  in  vocational  agriculture  in  training  farm 
boys,  vocational  home  economics  for  girls  in  home  making, 
vocational  trades,  guidance  and  distributive  education,,  the 
sum  of  $160,000.00  chargeable  to  that  part  of  the  general  reve- 
nue $©t  apart  for  the  free  public  schools  of  Missouri.  I  am 
advised  there  ar©  approximately  three  hundred  schools  offer- 
ing vocational  education*  Said  additional  funds  will  be  used 
for  reimbursing  schools  and  matching  Federal  funds  for  the 
same  purpose* 


510  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

4.  Missouri  School  for  the  Blind,  Division  of  Public 
Schools,  Department  of  Education,  the  sum  of  $4,000.00 
chargeable  to  that  part  of  the  general  revenue  set  apart  for 
the  support  of  the  free  public  schools  of  Missouri.  This  amount 
is  needed  in  order  to  complete  the  current  school  year. 

5.  Federal  Soldiers5  Home  (St.  James),  Division  of  Wel- 
fare, Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  the  sum  of 
$2,000.00  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund,    This 
amount  is  needed  due  to  increased  prices  in  food  and  other 
operational  items. 

6.  Missouri  State  Sanatorium  (ML  Veruon),  Division  of 
Health,  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  the  sum 
of  $5,000.00  chargeable  to  the  General  Revenue  Fund*   This 
amount  is  requested  in  order  to  purchase  a  special  drug  known 
as  streptomycin,  which  is  used  in  the  treatment  of  patients  at 
this  institution. 

7.  Missouri  Grain  Warehouse  Department,  State  De- 
partment of  Agriculture,  the  sum  of  $21,000.00  chargeable  to 
the  fund  into  which  the  fees  for  weighing  and  inspection  of 
grain  are  deposited,  as  follows: 

Personal  Service $15,000.00 

Operation 4,000.00 

Repairs  and  Replacements 2,000,00 

I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  consider  the 
above  requests  and  take  such  action  in  the  premises  as  may 
be  found  necessary, 

Respectfully  submitted, 
PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  511 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  21,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1O90 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  21,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

William  J.  Studt,  Republican,  3910  Sullivan,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Elections  Commission- 
ers for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  June 
14,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  George  P.  Utter,  resigned* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  21,  I£47 
From  the  J<wmal  of  the  Senate,  p* 


Oivicss,  STAW  OF  Misiousi,  JBFFHESQN  CITY, 
May  21,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office; 


512  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

John  C.  McLaughlin,  Sedalia,  Missouri,  as  Major  Gen- 
eral, Missouri  National  Guard,  and  assigned  as  Commanding 
General,  35th  Division;  to  rank  from  October  7,  1946. 

Winston  W.  Kratz,  10  Country  Life  Acres,  Clayton,  Mis- 
souri, as  Brigadier  General,  Missouri  National  Guard,  and 
assigned  as  Commanding  General,  57th  Fighter  Wing;  to  rank 
from,  June  14,  1946. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  22,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOUBI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  22,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Morris  E.  Osburn,  Shelbyville,  Missouri*  as  a  member  of 
the  Public  Service  Commission,  Department  of  Business  and 
Administration,  for  a  term  ending  April  15>  1953,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reap- 
p  ointment. 

Kyle  D.  Williams,  Albany,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Public  Service  Commission,  Department  of  Business  and  Ad- 
ministration, for  a  term  ending  April  15,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointmeivt 

I  designate  the  said  Morris  E*  Osburn  as  Chairman  of  the 
Public  Service  Commission,  Department  of  Business  and 
Administration* 

Respectfully  submitted* 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY* 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  513 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY  26,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  U '48- 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  26,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  58, 
entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  3100  of  Article  1  and  Section  3161 
of  Article  11,  Chapter  14  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  relating  to  the  presentment  for  payment  of 
negotiable  instruments  and  presentment  for  acceptance  of 
bills  of  exchange  and  to  enact  two  new  sections  in  lieu 
thereof  to  be  known  as  Section  3100  and  Section  3161 
relating  to  the  same  subject." 

On  May  26,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No*  58, 

However,  I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  in  the 
title,  in  line  3»  the  figures  "1 1"  should  be  "2*"  In  other  words, 
Section  3161  is  in  Article  2  and  not  in  Article  11,  This  same 
error  appears  in  Section  1,  line  2, 

Also,  on  page  2,  Section  3161,  line  3,  the  word  "Section" 
should  be  "Sections." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


514  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY  29,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  29,  1947. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  55,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  7,  8  and  12  of  an  act  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly,  approved  February  9,  1946,  known 
and  designated  as  House  Bill  526,  relating  to  the  creation 
and  establishment  of  the  office  of  constable  and  the  elec- 
tion of  constables  in  magistrate  districts  in  counties  of 
the  first  class  and  to  enact  three  new  sections  to  be  known 
and  designated  as  Sections  7,  7a  and  8,  relating  to  the 
same  subject  and  providing  for  deputy  constables,  their 
compensation  and  qualifications,  with  an  emergency 
clause," 

On  May  29,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  55, 
However,  it  is  my  opinion  that  Section  2»  the  emergency 
clause,  does  not  state  facts  sufficient  to  bring  this  bill  withiu 
the  provisions  of  the  Constitution  relating  to  an  emergency. 

Respectfully  submitted* 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  515 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  7,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1874- 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  7,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the   64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J.  G,  Morgan,  Republican,  Unionville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Highway  Commission,  for  a  term  ending 
December  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  William  A.  Snider,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STA  TE 

JULY  7,  1047 
From  th*  Jowrncd  of  th 


OFFICB,  STATU  or  MISSOURI,  JOTPBRSON 
July  7,  1047- 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No*  100,  entitled; 

"AN  ACT 

*To  repeal  Sections  10346,  10353,  10357,  10367, 
10370f  10374*  10390,  10392,  10393,  and  10397,  of  Article 
2»  Chapter  72,  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis®ourit  1939;  also 


516  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

an,  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly  approved  August  9, 
1941,  pages  547-548,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941;  also  an  act 
of  the  62nd  General  Assembly  approved  August  2,  1943, 
page  909,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943;  relating  to  all  classes 
of  schools  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  thirteen  new  sec- 
tions to  be  known  as  Sections  10327a,  10327b,  10346, 
10353,  10357,  10364a,  10367,  10370,  10374,  10390,  10392, 
10393,  and  10397,  relating  to  the  same  general  subject 
matter,  giving  to  the  State  Board  of  Education  and  the 
State  Commissioner  of  Education  certain  powers  and 
duties  heretofore  vested  in  the  State  Superintendent  of 
Public  Schools." 

On  July  7,  1947,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  100. 

I  call  attention,  to  the  fact  that  practically  all  of  the  pro- 
visions of  Section  10374  of  Senate  Bill  No.  100  were  included 
in  Section  10374  of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate 
Bill  No.  4  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly,  which  was 
approved  June  2,  1947.  In.  other  words,  Senate  Bill  No.  100 
repealed  and  reenacted  said  Section  10374  of  the  1939  Statutes, 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  4  also  re- 
pealed and  reenacted  Section  10374  but  contains  different  sub- 
ject matter  than  is  in  Section  10374  of  Senate  Bill  No*  100, 
Neither  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  4 
nor  Senate  Bill  No.  100  has  an  emergency  clause.  Therefore, 
Section  10374  of  Senate  Bill  No*  100  being  a  later  enactment, 
it  is  my  opinion  that  it  repeals  by  implication  Section  10374 
of  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No*  4» 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIt  M.  DONNELLY* 

Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  517 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  7,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  IS 87 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  7,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  162,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  11408,  11449  and  11453  of  an 
Act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill 
No.  652,  approved  March  29,  1946,  relating  to  and  known 
as  the  'Sales  Tax  Act/  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  three 
new  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject,  to  be  known 
as  Sections  11408,  11449,  and  11453." 

On  July  7,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  162. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  Sections  11449  and  11453 
onfpage  3  of  House  Bill  No.  162  are  duplicates  of  Sections 
11449  and  11453  of  House  Bill  No.  274  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly  which  I  have  previously  approved. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


518  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  8,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  8,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  oj 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  George  B.  Clark,  706  Ambassador  Building,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Chiropody,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  ra- 
appointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  8,  1947 
From  ih&  J&wrn&l  of  ih&  Senate,  p*  1$?$ 


Emcmrm  Omc»»  STATS  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFITOSON  CITY, 
July  8,  1947, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office; 

Doctor  Edwin  C  White,  3232  Euclid,  Kansas  City#  Mit- 
souri*  Democrat,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medieal 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  519 

Examiners,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1951,  and 
until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  re- 
appointment. 

Doctor  Howard  B.  Goodrich,  Hannibal,  Missouri,  Repub- 
lican, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners, 
Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1951,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  8,  1047 
From  th&  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p*  Z878 


OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JBJFFMKSON  CITY, 
July  8,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Ollin  Drennan,  Republican,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending 
July  1*  1955,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  reappomtment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


520  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

J'ULY  11,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1S97-IS98 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

July  11,  1947. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  117,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Section  4420  of  Article  4,  Chapter  31  of 
the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the 
punishment  of  persons  for  wife  or  child  abandonment  and 
for  failure  or  refusal  to  support  children,  and  to  enact  a 
new  section  in  lieu  thereof,  relating  to  the  same  subject, 
to  be  known  as  Section  4420." 

On  July  11,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No,  117. 

I  have  approved  House  Bill  No.  117  although  this  bill 
is  not  enrolled  in  accordance  with  the  record  as  shown  by  the 
Journal  of  the  House, 

When  the  bill  was  originally  introduced  in  the  House  it 
did  not  contain  the  words  in  Section  4420,  page  2,  lines  22  to 
25,  inclusive,  to-wit: 

"and  it  shall  be  no  defense  to  such  charge  that  some  per- 
son or  organization  other  than  the  defendant  has  fur- 
nished food,  clothing*  lodging,  medical  or  surgical  atten- 
tion for  said  wife,  child  or  children/* 

It  did  include  in  lines  25  to  29,  inclusive*  the  words: 

"and  he  or  she  shall,  upon  conviction*  be  punished  by 
imprisonment  in  the  county  jail  not  more  than  one  year, 
or  by  fine  not  exceeding  one  thousand  dollars  ($1,000)  or 
by  both  such  fine  and  imprisonment/* 

On  page  387  of  the  House  Journal  of  th©  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly*  House  Committee  Amendment  No.  2  was 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  521 

reported  by  the  committee,  which  amendment  struck  out  the 
above  words: 

"and  he  or  she  shall,  upon  conviction,  be  punished  by 
imprisonment  in  the  county  jail  not  more  than  one  year, 
or  by  fine  not  exceeding  one  thousand  dollars  ($1,000.00) 
or  by  both  such  fine  and  imprisonment" 

and  inserted  in  lieu  thereof  the  following: 

"and  it  shall  be  no  defense  to  such  charge  that  some  per- 
son or  organization  other  than  the  defendant  has  fur- 
nished food,  clothing,  lodging,  medical  or  surgical  atten- 
tion for  said  wife,  child  or  children." 

On  page  480  of  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  the  record  shows  that  House  Com- 
mittee Amendment  No.  2  was  adopted.  However,  in  perfect- 
ing the  bill  the  above  words,  pertaining  to  the  penalty  which 
were  stricken  out  by  House  Committee  Amendment  No.  2, 
were  left  in  the  bill  which  words  are: 

"and  he  or  she  shall,  upon  conviction,  be  punished  by 
imprisonment  in  the  county  jail  not  more  than  one  year, 
or  by  fme  not  exceeding  one  thousand  dollars  ($1,000.00) 
or  by  both  such  fme  and  imprisonment/' 

In  lines  21  and  22  on  page  2  of  the  Truly  Agreed  To  and 
Finally  Passed  House  Bill  No.  117  it  states  "then  such  person 
shall  be  deemed  guilty  of  a  misdemeanor,0  No  doubt  the 
House  Committee  deemed  this  language  sufficient  because  the 
general  statute  states  what  the  punishment  shall  be  for  a 
person  found  guilty  of  a  misdemeanor  and  for  that  reason  the 
specific  provision  for  the  punishment  was  stricken  out  of  the 
original  House  Bill  No*  117  by  House  Committee  Amendment 
No,  2,  In  perfecting  the  bill  the  specific  punishment  was 
again  included  in  the  bill 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  record  is  correct  on  this  bill 
and  the  further  fact  that  there  is  no  conflict  in  the  punishment 
provided  for  in  this  bill,  I  have  approved  the  bill* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIZ,  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


522  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STA  TE 

JtJLY  11,  1947 
the  Jowrn&l  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

July  11,  1947. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  289,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  amend  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
known  as  Senate  Bill  No.  349,  approved  May  3,  1946, 
relating  to  the  creation  and  establishment  of  a  depart- 
ment of  public  health  and  welfare,  by  inserting  immedi- 
ately following  Section  10  of  said  act,  nine  new  sections 
relating  to  the  institutions  under  the  control  of  the  de- 
partment of  public  health  and  welfare,  the  maintenance 
of  actions  in  court  in  behalf  of  the  institutions,  the  right 
of  eminent  domain  of  the  institutions,  the  furnishing  of 
living  quarters  to  employees  of  the,  institutions,  the  food 
furnished  to  persons  other  than  employees,  the  mistreat- 
ing of  persons  in  the  institutions,  the  furnishing  of  dis- 
eased or  unfit  foods  and  meats  to  patients,  the  aiding  of 
escape  of  state  wards  in  the  institutions,  and  the  employ- 
ment of  physicians  by  relatives  of  persons  committed  to 
such  institutions*  to  be  known  as  Sections  10a»  10b,  IQe, 
lOd,  lOe,  lOf,  IGg,  lOh,  and  101." 

On  July  11,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  280, 
I  call  attention  to  Section  lOa  on  page  2.  Section  lOa 
purports  to  be  a  copy  of  Section  9306,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  except  that  the  words  "eleemosynary  Institu- 
tion*1 are  changed  to  read  "department  of  public  health  and 
welfare*'  and  other  corrective  changes  are  made. 

However,  in  line  9  after  the  word  "institution1*  and  be- 
fore the  word  "on"  several  words  have  been  omitted.  Said 
omitted  words  being  "from  the  time  when  the  cause  of  action 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  523 

accrued.  In  actions  for  any  indebtedness,  or  for  any  damages 
due  the  institution."  It  is  my  opinion  that  said  words  or 
similar  language  should  be  inserted  in  Section  lOa  in  line  9 
after  the  word  "institution"  and  before  the  word  "on"  in  order 
to  make  said  sentence  read  correctly. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M-  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

'JULY  11,   1947 

From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  1404-1405 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  11,  1947. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  295,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  establish  funds  in  the  state  treasury  for  the 
state  hospitals,  state  school,  and  state  sanatorium ;  to  pro- 
vide a  revolving  fund  for  each  such  institution,  that 
charges  to  pay  patients  be  uniform  between  certain  of  the 
institutions,  that  the  department  of  revenue  shall  collect 
sums  due  such  institutions,  and  that  patients  may  be 
returned  to  counties  not  remitting  for  their  maintenance/* 

On  July  11,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No*  295- 
I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  in  Section  1,  line  5,  after 
the  word  "Whenever"  and  before  the  word  "any"  the  word 
"under"  apparently  has  been  omitted.  Said  word  "under" 
appeared  in  Section  9365,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
from  which  this  part  of  Section  1  of  House  Bill  No*  295  was 
copied. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY* 
Governor* 


524  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  11,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1276 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  11,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Harry  L.  Stover,  1248  West  61st  Street  Terrace,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  State  Board  of 
Accountancy,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  five  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  F.  G*  Buenger, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


JO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  22,  1947 
From  th*  JwnwU  of  the  Smat$>  pp» 


E3c»cuTiv»  Offid,  STAT»  OF  MISBOUEI,  tftormsoN  Crrv, 
July  322,  1047, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Committee  Substitute 
for  Senate  Bill  No-  79,  entitled: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  525 

"AN  ACT 

"To  provide  for  the  settlement  of  jurisdictional  labor 
disputes  and  disputes  over  labor  representation;  to  pro- 
hibit jurisdictional  strikes,  sympathy  strikes,  secondary 
boycotts  and  strikes  against  government  and  to  provide 
penalties  for  violation,  of  this  act;  to  require  and  regulate 
elections  among  members  of  labor  organizations  with  re- 
spect to  any  strike;  to  provide  for  the  enforcement  of 
working  agreements  or  contracts  between  employers  and 
labor  organizations;  to  provide  for  the  enforcement  of  the 
provisions  of  this  act,  and  to  provide  for  the  payment  of 
expenses  for  administration  of  this  act." 

On  July  22, 1947, 1  approved  said  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  79. 

I  call  attention  to  Section  1,  line  9,  page  2,  where  reference 
is  made  to  "Section  8  of  this  act."  This  reference  should  be 
to  Section  7  of  this  act.  In  the  original  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  79  the  original  Section  8  was 
renumbered  on  perfection  to  Section  7,  as  one  section  was 
stricken  from  the  bill  on  perfection  by  the  adoption  of  Senate 
Amendment  No,  4  striking  out  original  Section  3,  and  the 
remaining  sections  were  renumbered. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JULY  24,  1947 
From  th$  Journal  of  th&  Hou$$  of  H$pr®mnt&1&o&89  pp» 


EXBCUTIVB  QFHCB,  STATU  or  MXSSQUEX,  JMTTOSON  CITY, 
July  24,  1&47. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri; 

Sir;    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No,  105f  entitled: 


526  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

/'Authorizing,  defining  and  regulating  the  practice  of 
the  operative  procedures  of  dental  hygiene  by  duly  li- 
censed dental  hygienists  under  the  supervision  of  qualified 
dentists;  providing  for  the  administration  of  the  Act  by 
the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  and  prescribing  penalties  for 
violation  of  the  Act." 

On  July  24,  1947,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  105. 
I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following: 

On  page  4,  Section  8,  lines  3,  4,  and  5  it  provides  that  the 
registrant  shall  pay  to  the  Board  the  sum  of  two  dollars  as 
an  annual  license  fee,  etc. 

Senate  Bill  No.  110  enacted  by  the  Sixty-fourth  General 
Assembly  repealed  and  reenacted  certain  sections  of  Chapter 
64,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  State 
Board  of  Dental  Examiners.  Section  10064  of  Senate  Bill  No, 
110,  lines  30  to  35,  inclusive,  provides: 

"All  monies  collected  under  the  provisions  of  this 
chapter  shall  be  payable  to  and  collected  by  the  Division 
of  Collection  in  the  Department  of  Revenue  and  shall  be 
deposited  in  the  state  treasury  to  the  credit  of  the  dental 
board  fund  which  is  hereby  established/* 

The  above  provision  in  Section  8  of  House  Bill  No*  105 
conflicts  with  the  above  provision  in  Section,  10064  of  Seriate 
Bill  No*  110,  However,  from  a  practical  standpoint  I  believe 
these  two  bills  can  be  reconciled  until  House  Bill  No*  105  has 
been  corrected. 

In  House  Bill  No.  105  there  is  a  provision  in  Section  13 
on  page  7  as  follows: 

'The  monies  coming  to  the  Board  by  virtue  of  thii 
Act  shall  be  collected,  kept  and  deposited*  and  placed  in 
the  state  treasury  to  the  credit  of  the  same  fund,  as  is 
provided  for  in  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri!  1939*  Chap* 
ter  64*  and  amendments  thereto,  with  respect  to  the 
monies  coming  to  the  Board  by  virtue  of  that  Chapter-11 
(Underscoring  mine,) 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  527 

As  the  Missouri  Dental  Board  has  the  administration  of 
House  Bill  No.  105,  I  believe  the  license  fees  referred  to  in 
Section  8  of  House  Bill  No.  105  can  be  collected  by  the  Divi- 
sion of  Collection  in  the  Department  of  Revenue,  by  desig- 
nating the  secretary  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board  as  a  deputy 
of  the  Revenue  Department  for  the  purpose  of  collecting  the 
license  fees  and  paying  the  same  into  the  State  Treasury  as 
provided  for  in  Senate  Bill  No.  110. 

There  is  a  provision  in  House  Bill  No.  105  in  Section  5 
that  may  be  found  difficult  to  handle  from  a  practical  stand- 
point. In  lines  17  to  20  of  Section  5  it  states: 

"Provided  that  in  the  event  any  applicant  is  found 
by  the  Board  to  be  ineligible  to  take  the  examination 
twenty  (20)  dollars  of  the  twenty-five  (25)  dollars  fee  shall 
be  returned  to  the  applicant/' 

Under  the  revenue  law  and  the  Constitution,  all  fees  and 
licenses  arc  to  be  promptly  paid  into  the  State  Treasury.  I  do 
not  think  the  Board  has  any  authority  to  hold  the  applicant's 
fee  until  it  is  determined  whether  or  not  the  applicant  is 
ineligible  to  take  the  examination,  Said  proviso  does  not 
state  whether  it  is  the  Dental  Board  or  the  General  Assembly 
which  is  to  return  the  twenty  dollars  to  the  applicant,  It 
implies  that  it  is  the  Dental  Board*  However,  I  believe  this 
provision  can  be  made  workable  by  a  rule  adopted  by  the 
Missouri  Dental  Board. 

I  am  approving  this  bill,  but  1  suggest  that  it  be  corrected 
at  the  next  session  of  the  General  Assembly  so  that  it  will 
comply  with  the  law  pertaining  to  the  collection,  of  license  fees. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


528  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  31,  1947 
From  tke  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  138$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
'July  31,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

William  J.  Studt,  Republican,  3910  Sullivan,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  June 
14,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  George  P.  Utter,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  18,  1947 
From  tk$  Jcwmcd  of  th$  $$mt$t  p< 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  S? AT®  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFTOSON 
August  18,  1047, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  Stajfe  <?/ 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

W,  Robert  Evans,  Republican*  000  West  89th  Street* 
Kansas  City*  Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  529 

Training  Schools,  Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  De- 
partment of  Corrections,  for  a  term  of  six  years  from  the  18th 
day  of  August,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  John  Thornberry,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  25,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  IS 8 4 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEKSON  CITY, 
August  25,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  George  L.  Hale»  Sikeston,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  Slate  Board  of  Optometry,  Division  of  Registration  and 
Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term 
ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  Gus  W*  Sherman*  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


530  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  22,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  22,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 

P.  M.  Marr,  Democrat,  Milan,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Northeast  Missouri  State  Teach- 
ers College,  Kirksville,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Edu- 
cation, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1949,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Charles  W.  Shelton, 
deceased* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNEIXY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SEN  ATE 

SEPTBMBra  22,  1947 
From  the  Jwrnal  of  th$  S#n&t$»  p* 


OFFICE,  STATJB  OF  MISSOURI,  Smpwmw  Cmt 
Siptembw  22,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  offices 

Russell  W,  Gabriel,  Democrat,  410  North  River,  Inde- 
pendance,  Missouri,  as  a  member  and  Chairman  of  the  Botrd 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  531 

of  Election,  Commissioners  for  Jackson  County,  Missouri,  for 
a  term  ending  February  6,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  shall 
be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Ernest  W.  Cooper,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

SEPTEMBER  23,  1947 
From  tk$  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p,  IS 8 5 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  28,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J*  Doyle  Norris,  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Pharmacy,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examina- 
tion, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  Aug- 
ust 10,  1052,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY* 
Governor. 


532  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  13,  1947 
From  the  Jo'wmal  of  the  Senate,  p.  IS 86 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  13,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

R.  Robert  Cohn,  310  East  67th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  four  years  from  the 
time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Lowell  R,  John- 
son, term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

GCTOBEB  IS,  1947 

From  the  Jawrnal  of  th&  Smate,  p* 


EX3BCUTIVB  OFHCU,  STATI  OF  MISSOURI,  JUFFEESON  €n% 
October  IS,  1947* 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  Stale  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  James  M«  Hern,  Columbia,  Missouri  Republican 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropody,  Diviiion  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  533 

Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1948,  and  until  his  successor 
is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Doctor  C.  Milton  Stew- 
art, resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  24,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  IS 87 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
Octolxir  24,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Mrs,  Olive  J.  Decatur,  1131  Sherman,  Springfield,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln,  Uni- 
versity of  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term 
exxding  January  1,  1950,  and  until  her  successor  is  duly  ap- 
pointed and  qualified;  vice,  C,  C.  Hubbard,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


534  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  25,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1S87-1S88 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  25,  1947. 

To  the.  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Vance  Julian,  Clinton,  Missouri*  as  Chairman  and  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Board  of  Mediation,  Department  of  Labor 
and  Industrial  Relations,  for  a  term  ending  three  years  from 
October  25,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified. 

Charles  W.  Boutin,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Board  of  Mediation,  Department  of  Labor 
and  Industrial  Relations,  an  employer  of  labor,  for  a  term 
ending  two  years  from  October  25,  1947,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified. 

Gerald  H.  Frieling,  215  East  74th  Street,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Mediation,  De- 
partment of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations,  an  employer  of 
labor,  for  a  term  ending  one  year  from  October  25,  1947,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified* 

Carl  Mitchell,  14  Ponca  Trail,  Kirkwood,  St.  Louis 
County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Media- 
tion, Department  of  Labor  and  Industrial  Relations*  an  em- 
ployee holding  membership  in  a  labor  union,  for  a  term  ending 
two  years  from  October  25,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is 
duly  appointed  and  qualified* 

John  Alvm  White,  2501  Sylvaaia  Street,  St,  Joseph*  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Mediation  Depart* 
mant  of  Labor  a  ad  Industrial  Relations,  an  employe®  holding 
membership  in  a  labor  imion,  for  a  term  ending  one  year  from 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  535 

October  25,  1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  28,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the,  Senate,  p.  IS 88 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  28,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

George  M.  Reed,  Waynesville,  Pulaski  County,  Missouri, 
as  State  Service  Officer,  for  a  term  of  four  years  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Roy  F.  Sea- 
man* term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

NOVEMBER  26,  1047 
th$  Jmrncd  of  the  S$mte»  $p*  t$B8~l$89 


&t  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

November  26,  1947, 
To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 


I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  yotir 
consent  tad  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


536  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Walter  E.  Bryan,  professional  engineer,  5915  De  Giver- 
ville,  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of 
Registration  for  Architects  and  Professional  Engineers,  Divi- 
sion of  Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  October  29,  1953,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

John  M.  Schaper,  architect,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Registration  for  Architects 
and  Professional  Engineers,  Division  of  Registration  and  Exam- 
ination, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending 
October  29,  1953,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

William  M-  Spann,  professional  engineer,  230  West  70th 
Street,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Registration  for  Architects  and  Professional  Engineers,  Divi- 
sion of  Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Arthur  W,  Archer,  terax 
expired. 

I  designate  Bruce  Williams,  professional  engineer,  Joplin, 
Missouri,  who  is  now  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Regis- 
tration for  Architects  and  Engineers,  Division  of  Registration 
and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  us  Chair- 
man of  said  Board. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  537 


TO  THE  SENA  TE 

NOVEMBER  26,  1947 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  1389 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
November  26,  1947. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  John  A,  Brunner,  Route  4,  Oak  Hill  Gardens, 
North  Kansas  City,  Clay  County,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  Division  of  Registration  and  Ex- 
amination, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending 
five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Charles  W*  Keeling,  term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

NOVUMSUK  20,  1947 
From  t&f  Jounml  of  th& 


Bx®cimvn  OFF  jo,  STATB  OF  Mi&soxmi,  JOT&HSQN  CITY, 
November  20,  1047. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
co&seat  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 


538  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Charles  F.  Lamkin,  Jr.,  Democrat,  647  West  59th  Street, 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1950,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  James  E.  Nugent, 
deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  GENERAL  ASSEMBLY 

JANUAEY  7,  1948 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Howe  of  R$pr&8$ntative8f  pp. 


To  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  Sixty~fourth 
General  Assembly: 

Before  this  General  Assembly  recessed  on  July  14,  1947f 
appropriations  were  made  for  the  period  beginning  July,  1947, 
and  ending  June  30,  1948,  for  the  purpose  of  providing  funds 
for  the  support  of  the  State  government. 

Since  these  appropriations  were  made  events  and  circum- 
stances beyond  our  control  have  made  some  of  them  totally 
inadequate.  Further,  laws  were  enacted  requiring  the  ex- 
penditure of  funds  for  which  no  appropriations  were  made* 
Also,  certain  programs  which  operate  under  constitutional 
and  statutory  mandate  are  affected  and  require  additional 
appropriations- 
It  is  therefore  my  duty  to  come  before  you  today  to 
recommend  that  supplemental  and  additional  appropriations 
be  made  for  the  remainder  of  the  current  fiscal  year  in  order 
that  certain  institutions  and  departments  of  the  State  gov- 
ernment may  continue  to  function  and  that  appropriations 
for  emergencies  be  enacted* 

With  these  purposes  in  mind  I  wish  to  submit  the  follow* 

ing  information  and  to  make  suggestions  and  recommendations: 

It  is  generally  known  there  has  been  an  mereata  in  ifat 

cost  of  food,  clothing,  grain,  coal,  freight  rates,  and  other  com- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  539" 

modities.  This  increase  has  been  and  is  a  serious  problem  in 
the  operation  of  certain  institutions  of  the  State  government. 
The  cost  of  food  at  the  State  Hospitals  has  increased  thirty- 
five  to  forty-five  per  cent  within  the  past  twelve  months.  In 
1946  corn  was  $1.52  per  bushel  and  now  it  is  $2.85  per  bushel. 
In  1946  oats  were  85  cents  per  bushel  and  now  $1.35  per 
bushel.  In  1946  denim  was  25  cents  per  yard  and  now  it  is 
45  cents  per  yard.  Unbleached  muslin  was  18  cents  per  yard 
and  now  it  is  35  cents  per  yard.  Bleached  muslin  was  22 
cents  per  yard  and  now  it  is  40  cents  per  yard.  All  of  these 
articles  are  essential  and  necessary  in  the  operation  of  the 
State  Hospitals.  Similar  comparisons  of  increased  cost  can 
be  made  of  numerous  other  articles. 

There  were  garden  failures  at  all  the  Hospitals  during 
the  past  summer.  This  was  due  to  excessive  rains  and  adverse 
weather  conditions  in  the  early  part  of  the  season  and  later 
to  the  long  drouth  period.  The  Hospitals  depend  to  a  large 
extent  on  their  gardens  for  green  vegetables  in  season  and  for 
canning  for  winter  consumption* 

For  instance,  at  Hospital  No.  1,  Fulton,  in  1946  seventeen 
thousand  gallons  of  tomatoes  were  canned.  In  1947  no  toma- 
toes were  canned*  The  Hospitals  have  endeavored  to  recoup 
their  garden  losses  by  canning  donated  sweet  potatoes  and  in 
the  purchase  of  apples  but  even  so  they  are  short  of  fruit  and 
vegetables  necessary  for  a  balanced  diet. 

In  past  years  the  Hospitals  received  a  considerable  amount 
of  government  donated  commodities,  but  they  have  not  re- 
ceived such  commodities  to  any  great  extent  during  the  cur- 
rent fiscal  year.  In  1940,  for  example,  they  received  many 
carloads  of  potatoes  for  the  cost  of  the  freight  alone.  In  1947 
they  had  to  purchase  potatoes  at  the  increased  market  prices. 

During  the  war  the  Hospitals  depleted  their  storeroom 
supplies  but  they  had  hoped  to  replenish  needed  supplies  after 
the  war.  They  have  been  prevented  from  doing  this  by  the 
continual  rise  in  prices*  Consequently,  in  addition  to  their 
present  needs  they  again  should  build  tip  a  stock  of  items 
such  as  sheets*  pillow  cases,  towels,  winter  clothing,  soap, 
chemicals,  drugs,  and  other  necessary  articles, 

For  the  above  reasons,  a  supplemental  appropriation  of 
f 297fG00,00  from  General  Revenue  for  Operation  for  the  re- 


540  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

maiixing  period  of  the  fiscal  year  for  the  following  institutions 
is  recommended: 

State  Hospital  No.  1,  Fulton $  70,000.00 

State  Hospital  No.  2,  St.  Joseph 68,000.00 

State  Hospital  No.  3,  Nevada 58,000.00 

State  Hospital  No.  4,  Farmington 51,000.00 

Missouri  State  School,  Marshall  and 

Carrollton 50,000.00 


$297,000.00 

I  am  informed  that  an  additional  appropriation  of  $1,~ 
000.00  for  Operation  will  be  needed  at  the  Confederate  Home 
at  Higginsville  for  the  current  fiscal  year  ending  June  30,  1948. 
The  Department  of  Corrections  is  confronted  with  the 
same  problem  of  increased  prices  in  the  purchase  of  food  and 
commodities  as  is  experienced  by  the  State  Hospitals.  For 
instance,  stoker  coal  was  $2.15  per  ton  in  November,  1946, 
It  has  increased  in  price  until  now  it  is  $4,00  per  ton*  During 
the  past  six  months  approximately  fifteen  thousand  tons  of 
coal  have  been  used  and  paid  for  out  of  current  funds,  On 
this  price  basis  for  the  next  six  months  there  will  be  au  increase 
in  the  cost  of  coal  of  $18,750.00.  In  November,  1940,  flour 
was  $4,55  per  hundred  weight.  It  is  now  $7.00  per  hundred 
weight.  Approximately  288,500  pounds  of  flour  were  used 
during  the  period  of  July  1  to  December  31,  1947.  Numerous 
other  examples  of  the  increased  cost  of  food  and  commodities 
could  be  given* 

There  was  a  complete  loss  of  vegetable,  grain,  and  hay 
crops  on  the  farms  and  land  under  the  supervision  of  the 
Department  of  Corrections  on  account  of  the  floods  in  June, 
1947,  This  loss  was  estimated  at  $250,000,00  and  lias  been 
continuously  and  keenly  felt  when  food  and  commodity  items 
to  replace  these  losses  are  purchased  at  current  inflationary 
prices.  It  was  necessary  to  expend  for  cabbage,  onions*  toma- 
toes, corn,  and  other  vegetables  approximately  $27»Q00«QQ  since 
July,  1947,  It  will  be  necessary  to  continue  to  buy  vegetables 
until  the  1948  crop*  The  same  is  true  as  to  the  grain  and 
hay  crops* 

Therefore,  because  of  the  devasting  floods,  the  drouth 
that  followed  the  floods,  and  the  increase  in  the  current  prices 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  541 

of  food,  clothing,  grain,  coal,  and  other  commodities,  a  supple- 
mental appropriation  of  $125,000.00  for  Operation  from  Gen- 
eral Revenue  for  the  Department  of  Corrections  will  be  needed 
for  the  State  Penitentiary  and  the  sum  of  $30,000.00  for  Opera- 
tion from  General  Revenue  will  be  needed  by  the  Intermediate 
Reformatory  —  Algoa,  for  the  remainder  of  the  current  fiscal 
year. 

The  State  Board  of  Training  Schools  states  that  on  ac- 
count of  the  increased  cost  of  operation  it  is  necessary  to  have 
an,  additional  appropriation  of  $25,000.00  from  General  Reve- 
nue for  Operation  at  the  Training  School  for  Boys  for  the 
remainder  of  the  current  fiscal  year. 

The  appropriation  for  Operation  of  the  Division  of  Public 
Buildings  in  the  Department  of  Revenue  was  $65,000.00  for  the 
current  fiscal  your,  There  is  an  unencumbered  balance  in  this 
fund,  as  of  December  31,  1947,  of  $35,265.00.  However,  con- 
sidering the  increase  in  the  price  of  coal,  fuel,  oil,  freight,  and 
necessary  supplies,  it  is  estimated  that  an  additional  sum  of 
$16,000.00  will  be  required  for  the  remainder  of  the  current 
fiscal  year, 

I  am  advised  by  the  Director  of  the  Division  of  Public 
Buildings  that  the  roof  on  the  Capitol  Building  has  deteri- 
orated to  such  an  extent  that  there  are  a  number  of  leaks  in 
various  parts  of  the  roof.  The  flashing  is  in  bad  condition, 
which  will  necessitate  new  flashing  at  the  wall  line  all  along 
the  building.  A  large  part  of  the  copper  roof  should  be  re- 
placed and  the  remainder  re-soldered*  The  Director  of  the 
Division  of  Public  Buildings  has  estimated  that  an  appropria- 
tion of  $17,500.00  should  be  made  for  repairing  the  roof  of 
the  Capitol  Building- 

This  General  Assembly  enacted  legislation  authorizing  in- 
creases in  the  salaries  of  the  judges  and  commissioners  of  the 
Supreme  and  Appellate  Courts,  and  the  members  of,  and  the 
general  counsel  and  secretary  to  the  Public  Service  Commis- 
sion* An  additional  appropriation  to  pay  these  increases  in 
salary,  for  the  remainder  of  the  fiscal  year  ending  June  30, 
1948*  is  recommended  as  follows: 


Salaries  of  Judges  of  the  Supreme  Court. 
Salaries  of  Commissioners  of  the  Supreme 

Court,  .......  ........  .  ____  .  .....  .  .     9,700,00 


542  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Salaries  of  Judges  of  the  Kansas  City  Court 

of  Appeals 14,850.00 

Salaries  of  Commissioners  of  the  Kansas 

City  Court  of  Appeals 3,233.34 

Salaries  of  Judges  of  the  Springfield  Court 

of  Appeals 4,850.00 

Salaries  of  Judges  and  Commissioners  of 

the  St.  Louis  Court  of  Appeals 8,083.34 

Salaries  of  five  Commissioners  on  the  Pub- 
lic Service  Commission 6,062*50 

Salary  of  General  Counsel  to  the  Public 

Service  Commission 1,212.50 

Salary  of  Secretary  to  the  Public  Service 

Commission 450.00 

This  General  Assembly  enacted  Senate  Committee  Sub- 
stitute for  Senate  Bill  No.  79,  entitled; 

"An  Act  to  provide  for  the  settlement  of  jurisdictional 
labor  disputes  and  disputes  over  labor  representation;  to 
prohibit  jurisdictional  strikes,  sympathy  strikes,  second- 
ary boycotts  and  strikes  against  government  and  to  pro- 
vide penalties  for  violation  of  this  act;  to  require  and 
regulate  elections  among  members  of  labor  organizations 
with  respect  to  any  strike;  to  provide  for  the  enforcement 
of  working  agreements  or  contracts  between  employers 
and  labor  organizations;  to  provide  for  the  enforcement 
of  the  provisions  of  this  act,  and  to  provide  for  the  pay- 
ment of  expenses  for  administration  of  this  act.1* 

However,  funds  were  not  appropriated  by  the  Camera! 
Assembly  for  the  payment  of  the  expenses  of  administering 
this  act. 

The  Industrial  Commission  has  received  requests  to  con* 
duct  a  large  number  of  strike  elections  under  the  provisions 
of  this  act.  It  will  be  necessary  to  employ  a  staff*  rent  offlca 
space,  buy  office  equipment  and  supplies,  in  addition  to  the 
expense  of  operation.  It  is  estimated  there  will  be  needed  tha 
sum  of  $60»<XK).0Q  to  administer  this  law  for  the  period  ending 
June  30,  1948. 

The  Supreme  Court  in  construing  an  act  of  the  Sixty- 
third  General  Assembly,  Laws  of  Missouri*  1946,  page  807* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  543 

providing  for  magistrate  courts  within  cities  of  more  than 
600,000  inhabitants,  ruled  that  the  State  shall  pay  the  salaries 
of  a  chief  clerk  and  two  deputy  clerks  for  the  magistrate 
court  of  the  City  of  St.  Louis.  The  appropriation  for  the 
current  fiscal  year  does  not  provide  for  these  salaries.  The 
salaries  for  these  officers  for  the  current  fiscal  year  are:  Chief 
Clerk  $5,000.00,  2  deputies,  $2,400.00  each,  making  a  total  of 
$9,800.00.  ' 

Also,  there  should  be  an  appropriation  to  pay  the  salary 
of  the  chief  clerk  of  the  magistrate  court  of  the  City  of  St. 
Louis  for  the  period  of  four  (4)  months  ending  June  30,  1947, 
of  $1,666.66;  and  for  the  salary  of  one  deputy  clerk  for  two 
months,  $400,00,  making  a  total  of  $2,066.66. 

Senate  Bill  No.  94  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly 
provides  that  the  State  shall  pay  the  premiums  on  the  bonds 
of  the  clerks  of  the  magistrate  courts.  However,  no  appro- 
priation was  mudc  for  ihm  purpose.  It  is  recommended  that 
the  sum  of  $1,000.00  be  appropriated  to  pay  such  premiums. 

In  regard  to  the  salaries  of  special  magistrates,  the  Attor- 
ney General  has  ruled  that  the  provisions  in  Section  10a»  page 
77 1»  Laws  of  Missotiri  1945,  for  charging  salaries  and  expenses 
of  special  magistrates  against  the  salary  of  the  regular  magis- 
trate, does  not  apply  to  probate  judges  who  act  as  magistrates 
ia  counties  of  30,000  or  less  population,  but  that  the  regular 
probate  judge  and  ex~officio  magistrate  in  such  counties  should 
receive  the  full  pay  regardless  of  the  amount  paid  to  a  special 
probate  judge  and  ex-officio  magistrate*  The  present  appro- 
priation is  for  the  exact  amount  needed  to  pay  the  regular 
probate  judges  and  ex-officio  magistrates  as  provided  by  law. 
Unless  an  additional  appropriation  is  made  for  special  magis- 
trates, there  will  not  be  sufficient  funds  to  pay  the  regular 
probate  judges  and  ex-officio  magistrates  for  the  entire  year* 

I  call  your  attention  to  the  fact  that  an  additional  appro- 
priation will  be  required  to  pay  the  State's  part  of  the  cost 
of  assessing  and  collecting  the  revenue*  The  total  amount 
of  claims  due  the  counties  and  the  City  of  St.  Louis  is  un- 
known at  this  time* 

There  was  appropriated  for  the  current  fiscal  year,  charge- 
able to  th©  General  Revenue  Fund,  the  sum  of  J14,000,(X>  to 
pay  the  saverai  counties  for  wolf  bounties.  This  General 


544  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Assembly  increased  the  amount  that  a  county  court  may  pay 
for  wolf  bounties.  Claims  approved  and  charged  against  the 
current  appropriation  to  December  31,  1947,  amount  to  $9,- 
653.50,  leaving  a  balance  in  the  appropriation  of  $4,346.50. 
However,  it  is  estimated  that  an  additional  sum  of  $12,000,00 
for  this  purpose  will  be  required  for  the  remainder  of  the  cur- 
rent fiscal  year. 

The  appropriation  for  the  current  fiscal  year  for  the  appre- 
hension of  criminals  was  $15,000.00.  Payments  during  the 
first  half  of  the  current  fiscal  year  were  approximately  thirty 
per  cent  higher  than  the  first  half  of  the  fiscal  year  1946-1947, 
Assuming  that  payments  will  continue  at  the  same  rate,  an 
additional  sum  of  $4,500.00  will  be  required  for  the  remainder 
of  the  current  fiscal  year. 

There  was  appropriated  for  the  current  fiscal  year,  out  of 
the  State  Highway  Department  Fund,  the  sum  of  $lf050»- 
000.00  for  the  purpose  of  paying  gasoline  tax  refunds  as  pro- 
vided by  law*  Claims  approved  and  charged  against  this 
appropriation  to  December  31,  1947,  amount  to  $853,348,39, 
leaving  a  balance  of  $196,651.61.  It  is  estimated  that  claims 
for  gasoline  tax  refunds  for  the  balance  of  the  fiscal  year  will 
amount  to  $758,000.00,  In  order  that  such  claims  may  be 
paid,  as  provided  by  law,  I  recommend  an  additional  appro- 
priation of  $562,000.00,  chargeable  to  the  State  Highway 
Department  Fund, 

Appropriations  for  the  current  fiscal  year  for  old  age 
assistance  and  aid-to-dependent  children  are  not  sufficient  to 
meet  in  full  the  needs  of  persons  eligible  for  assistance  under 
these  programs*  Old  age  assistance  recipients  are  now  being 
paid  on  the  basis  of  ninety  per  cant  of  the  amount  to  which 
they  are  entitled  under  the  law,  and  aid*todepandent  child? en 
recipients  receive  sixty-six  and  two4hirds  per  cent  of  the 
amount  to  which  they  are  found  to  be  eligible  from  aid-to* 
dependent  children  funds,  The  Federal  government  partic* 
ipates  financially  in  both  of  these  programs,  meeting  approxi- 
mately fifty-eight  per  cent  of  total  old  aga  assistance  expendi- 
tures and  paying  about  sixty  per  cent  of  the  total  costs  for 
aid4o-dependent  children*  Reductions  have  been  made  In 
the  grants  of  the  recipients  under  these  two  Federal-State  pro- 
grams since  July*  1847* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  545 

I  recommend  that  this  General  Assembly  authorize  by 
resolution  the  payment  of  grants  in  full,  effective  January  1, 
1948,  for  both  old  age  assistance  and  aid-to-dependent  chil- 
dren and  that  additional  funds  be  appropriated  by  this  Gen- 
eral Assembly  prior  to  its  adjournment  to  provide  for  the 
amount  which  will  be  needed  to  meet  the  deficit  which  would 
be  incurred  through  payment  of  full  grants. 

The  Federal  government  will  make  available  Federal 
funds  to  meet  the  government's  share  of  the- amounts  deducted 
from  the  assistance  checks  for  both  aid-to-dependent  children 
and  old  age  assistance  for  two  months  prior  to  January,  1948, 
namely:  the  months  of  December  and  November,  1947,  if 
this  supplemental  payment  is  authorized  in  January,  1948. 
I  believe  that  this  General  Assembly  should  give  serious  con- 
sideration to  authorizing  the  payment  to  each  recipient  of  the 
amounts  deducted  from  the  checks  for  November  and  Decem- 
ber, 1947, 

Since  the  Federal  government  will  match  payments  for 
November  and  December,  1947,  if  the  payment  is  authorized 
in  January,  1948,  it  is  my  belief  that  the  State  should  take 
advantage  of  the  amounts  that  are  available  from  the  Federal 
government  and  provide  State  funds  by  resolution  in  Jan- 
uary to  compensate  those  on  old  age  assistance  and  aid-to- 
dapendent  children  rolls  for  the  amounts  deducted  from  their 
checks  for  those  two  months* 

Unemployable  persons  on  general  relief  rolls  in  Missouri 
are  being  paid  on  the  basis  of  fifty-two  per  cent  of  the  amount 
which  it  has  been  determined  they  require  to  meet  minimum 
subsistence  needs,  Parsons  on  general  relief  are  entirely  un- 
employable, consisting  of  the  crippled,  the  sick,  and  otherwise 
destitute  who  have  no  possibility  of  earning  their  livelihood. 

I  recommend  that  the  General  Assembly  appropriate  addi- 
tional funds  for  the  remainder  of  the  current  fiscal  year  to 
pay  grants  to  unemployable  persons  on  relief  rolls  on  a  basis 
of  decency  and  health  as  provided  by  State  law. 

I  am  advised  by  the  State  Veterinarian  that  it  may  be 
necessary  to  enforce  strict  quarantine  measures  to  protect  the 
live  itock  industry  of  Missouri  if  the  foot  and  mouth  disease 
in  cattle  should  spread  to  this  country. 

Aecordi&g  to  recant  reports  it  would  appear  that  all  efforts 
of  the  American  and  Mexican  authorities  have  failed  to  eradi- 


546  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

cate  this  disease.  If  the  disease  is  permanently  established  on 
Mexican  soil  it  will  mean  that  the  United  States  will  have  to 
enforce  rigid  quarantine  measures  if  we  are  successfully  to  pre- 
vent the  infection  from  entering  this  country.  It  is  not  nec- 
essary for  us  to  become  unduly  alarmed  about  this  matter 
to  appreciate  its  serious  nature.  We  must  take  cognizance  of 
the  fact  that  many  American  citizens  travel  to  Mexico  by 
automobile  and  plane,  and  even  though  precautions  are  taken 
the  virus  may  find  its  way  into  our  country.  We  cannot 
afford  to  temporize  with  this  disease. 

In  view  of  the  large  live  stock  industry  in  Missouri,  I 
suggest  that  the  General  Assembly  give  serious  consideration 
to  an  emergency  appropriation  of  $100,000.00  to  bo  used  in 
the  event  we  are  called  upon  to  take  action.  I  am  informed 
that  a  number  of  states  already  have  set  aside  funds  for  this 
purpose. 

The  recommendations  that  I  have  made  today  cover  only 
supplemental,  additional,  and  emergency  appropriations  for 
the  remainder  of  the  current  fiscal  year.  If  in  addition  to  the 
regular  appropriation  measures,  the  recommendations  sub- 
mitted in  this  message,  and  legislation  which  is  pending  and 
under  consideration,  the  General  Assembly  has  time  to  con- 
sider new  legislation  I  will  have  recommendations  to  submit 
for  its  consideration* 

Again  I  assure  the  members  of  the  General  Assembly  of 
my  cooperation  in  your  efforts  to  serve  the  State, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY* 

Governor- 
January  7,  1948. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  547 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUAEY  13,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1410-14.11 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
January  13,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  May  21,  1947,  I  appointed  William  J.  Studt,  Republi- 
can, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election  Commissioners 
for  the  City  of  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  June 
14,  1949;  vice,  George  P.  Utter,  resigned.  Mr.  Studt' s  resi- 
dence address  at  that  time  was  3910  Sullivan,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri. 

His  appointment  was  not  acted  upon  by  the  Senate  at 
the  time  of  its  recess  on  July  14,  1947. 

Thereafter,  on  July  31,  1947,  I  appointed  William  J, 
Studt,  Republican,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Election 
Commissioners  for  the  City  of  St  Louis,  Missouri,  for  a  term 
ending  June  14,  1949;  vice,  George  P.  Utter,  resigned.  His 
residence  address  at  that  time  was  3910  Sullivan,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri.  A  commission  was  issued  to  Mr.  Studt. 

I  am  advised  by  Mr.  Studt  that  since  his  appointment 
July  31,  1947,  he  has  moved  from  3910  Sullivan  Avenue  to 
4144  St.  Louis  Avenue  and  that  his  residence  address  uow  is 
4144  St*  Louis  Avenue,  St  Louis,  Missouri* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


548  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JANUAKY  20,  1948 
From  the  Jowrnal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICES,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JBFFEESON  CITY, 
January  20,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

John  J,  Powers,  Democrat,  6250  Westminster  Place,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Highway  Commis- 
sion, for  a  term  ending  December  1,  1953,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment* 

John  C.  Harlin,  Republican,  Gainesville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Highway  Commission,  for  a  term  ending 
six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
E.  N.  Meador,  term  expired* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JAKUJJBY  20»  1048 
From  th&  Jowrnal  of  the 


OFFICE,  Sims  OF  Miisoum,  Jmrnrnw  Cm, 
January  20,  1948- 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64ih  Geneml  A$$embly  o/  ffte  State  of 


I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  lor  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  549 

Preston  N.  Cook,  Democrat,  Moixett,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Development, 
Department  of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term  end- 
ing six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualifica- 
tion and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  W.  P.  Keltner,  term  expired. 

Uel  W.  Lamkin,  Democrat,  Maryville,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Develop- 
ment, Department  of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term 
ending  six  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  quali- 
fication and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  Bert  Cooper,  term  expired. 

M,  R.  Rowland,  Democrat,  Caruthersville,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Develop- 
ment, Department  of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term 
ending  November  21,  1953,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappomtment, 

Herman  M.  Haag,  Republican,  Columbia,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  State  Commission  of  Resources  and  Develop- 
ment, Department  of  Business  and  Administration,  for  a  term 
ending  November  21,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Allen  P.  Green,  Jr.,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FteBUABtf  3,  1948 
From  the  /<mntol  of  the  Senate,  #.  18QX 


Exwmxvi  0mc»,  STATE  OF  MIS&CWBI,  JBFITOSON  Cmr, 

P«broixy  8,  im 
To  the  Senate  of  the  84th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 


1  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  followiiig  appointment  to  office; 


550  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Charles  A.  Miller,  Democrat,  20  West  36th  Street,  Kan- 
sas City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Tax  Commission, 
Department  of  Revenue,  for  a  term  ending  January  23,  1954, 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointrnent. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

FEBRUARY  18,  1948 
From  th&  Journal  of  the  Senate*  p* 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITT, 
February  13,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 

John  H,  Flanigan,  Jr.,  Republican,  Carthage*  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  end* 
ing  July  1»  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  John  H*  Fianigan,  Jr.,  resigned  and  reap- 
pointed. 

Respectfully  submitted* 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  551 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAKCH  4,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  1655-1656 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  4,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Alfred  Fleishman,  Democrat,  5656  Waterman  Avenue, 
St.  Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Train- 
ing Schools,  Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department 
of  Corrections,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1952,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  William  Wildeboor, 
removed  by  Governor  January  30,  1948, 

Oren  J*  Lamb,  Republican,  Macon,  Missouri,  as  a  trustee 
of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division  of  Educa- 
tional Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a  term  end- 
ing July  1*  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Mrs.  Mayme  H.  Ousley,  removed  by  Governor 
January  30,  1948. 

Francis  Smith,  Democrat,  2100  Lovers  Lane,  St.  Joseph, 
Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools, 
Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Correc- 
tionsf  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1950,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Mrs*  Tom  Stark,  removed 
by  Governor  January  30,  1948* 

A*  B,  Cooper,  Republican,  Charleston,  Missouri,  as  a 
trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division  of 
Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  ending  July  1»  1949f  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  Yice>  Fred  W,  Naeter,  removed  by  Governor 
January  30,  1948* 

J,  S*  WUHamion,  Democrat  Route  4*  Columbia,  Mis- 
as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools, 


552  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Correc- 
tions, for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1948,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Thomas  P.  Neill,  removed  by 
Governor  January  30,  1948. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAECH  4,  1948 
From  the  Jowrml  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JBFFBESON  CITY, 
March  4,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

On  August  18,  1947,  I  appointed  and  commissioned  W, 
Robert  Evans,  Republican,  600  West  69th  Street,  Kansas  City, 
Missouri,  as  a  trustee  of  the  Stale  Board  of  Training  Schools, 
Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Correc- 
tions, for  a  term  of  six  years  from  the  18th  day  of  August, 
1947,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
John  Thornberry,  term  expired,  and  delivered  said  appoint- 
ment to  the  office  of  the  Secretary  of  the  Senate  on  August 
18,  1947;  the  Senate  has  not  acted  on  said  appointment 

On  January  30,  1948,  I  removed  W.  Robert  Evans  as  a 
trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools  and,  therefore, 
wish  to  withdraw  from  your  consideration  the  name  of  W, 
Robert  Evans  and  submit  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  appointment 
to  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  as  follows: 

J,  John  Gillis,  Republican,  Park  Central  Hotel,  Kansts 
City,  Missouri!  as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training 
Schools,  Division  of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of 
Corrections*  for  a  term  ending  si%  years  from  the  time  of  hit 
appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his  successor  is 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  553 

pointed  and  qualified;  vice,  John  Thornberry,  term  expired; 
and  vice,  W,  Robert  Evans,  removed  by  Governor  January 
30,  1948. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  11,  1948 
From  the  Jownal  of  the  Senate,  #. 


OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  11,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No*  293,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

MTo  repeal  Section  3727,  Article  2,  Chapter  29,  of 
the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by 
an  act  of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1941,  page  718,  approved  July  28,  1941,  relat- 
ing to  limitation  of  action  under  the  Workmen's  Com- 
pensation Act,  and  to  enact  a  new  section  in  lieu  thereof 
relating  to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as 
Section  3727*#l 

On  March  11,  1948, 1  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  293, 

This  bill  refers  to  Article  2  in  Chapter  29*   There  is  no 

Article  2  in  Chapter  29,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939* 

Retpectfully  submitted, 
PHIL 

Governor* 


554  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  15,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  'Senate,  pp.  iriQ-1711 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  -STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  15,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 

F.  Claude  Davis*  Jr.,  30th  and  Francis,  St.  Joseph,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
the  City  of  St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  February 
19,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  ML  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAKCH  1$,  1948 
From  th$ 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  or  MISSOURI,  JWFISSON  CITY, 
March  15,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  84th  General  A$$emMy  of  the  State  o/ 
Missouri: 

On  August  25,  1947,  I  appointed  and  commissioned  Doe* 
tor  George  L,  Hale,  Sikeston*  Missouri*  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Board  of  Qptometry,  Division  of  Registration  and  Ex- 
amination, State  Department  of  Education!  for  a  term  ending 
five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vtet» 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  555 

Gus  W.  Sherman,  term  expired,  and  delivered  said  appoint- 
ment to  the  office  of  the  Secretary  of  the  Senate  on  August 
25,  1947;  the  Senate  has  not  acted  on  said  appointment. 

On  January  5,  1948,  I  received  and  accepted  the  resigna- 
tion of  Doctor  George  L.  Hale  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Optometry  and,  therefore,  wish  to  withdraw  from  your 
consideration  the  name  of  Doctor  George  L,  Hale  and  submit 
in  lieu  thereof  a  new  appointment  to  the  State  Board  of 
Optometry,  as  follows: 

Doctor  Joseph  L.  Mosley,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Optometry,  Division  of  Regis- 
tration and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for 
a  term  ending  five  years  from  the  time  of  his  appointment  and 
qualification  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  Gus  W.  Sherman,,  term  expired  and  vice,  George 
L,  Hale,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAECH  18,  1948 
From  th&  Journal  of  th&  Sen&U,  #* 


EXECUTIVES  OFFIC»>  •STATES  OF  MISSOURI,  JBFFBBSON  CITY, 
M&ttch  15,  1948* 

Honorable  Roy  IX  Miller*  Secretary  of  the  Senate,  Jqfferson  City, 
Mmouri: 

Dear  Senator  Miller: 

I  would  appreciate  your  conveying  to  the  members  of 
the  State  Senate  my  sincere  thanks  for  the  Resolution  which 
they  adopted  and  for  the  flowers  which  they  sent  to  me  on 
the  occasion  of  my  birthday. 

With  best  wishes,  I  am 

Sincerely, 

PHIL  M.  DOHNBLLY* 


556  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  22,  1948 
From  the  Jcwmal  of  the  Senate t  pp.  1816-1817 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
March  22,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Dewey  P.  Thatch,  Republican,  Clinton,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  Central  Missouri  State 
College,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  George  Burns, 
resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M-  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


TO  TEE  SENATE 

MARCH  25,  1948 
From  ttw  Jwm&t  <?/  th*  S&n&t4t  p* 


Owid,  STATE  or  Misnotmi*  JwroaaoN  CITY, 
Hatch  25,  1948* 

To  the  Senate  of  the  84th  General  Amembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office; 

Frank  L*  Williams,  4217  Enright  Avenue,  St.  Louis*  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  Uni- 
versity of  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  557 

term  ending  January  1,  1954,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  A.  Willard  Craddock,  term 
expired. 

Earl  D,  Thomas,  2418  West  Paseo,  Kansas  City,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University 
of  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  end- 
ing January  1,  1954,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  J.  Edward  Perry,  term  expired. 

Carl  G.  Stifel,  625  South  Skinker,  St.  Louis,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University 
of  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  end- 
ing January  1,  1954,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  John  W.  Evans,  term  expired. 

Canby  G.  Lord,  4231  Windsor,  Kansas  City,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of  Lincoln  University 
of  Missouri,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  end- 
ing January  1,  1950,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  Edward  W.  Opfer,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MARCH  2i>,  1948 
From  th&  Journal  of  th&  Senate,  pp. 


OFFICE,  -STATI  OF  MISSOUBI,  JWFURSON  Cn% 

March  29,  1948, 
To  the  Senate  of  the  84th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 


I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  215,  entitled: 

4IAN  ACT 

*To  amend  Section  8780f  Article  3»  Chapter  38t  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1039*  relating  to  a  special  tax 
bill  against  property  assessed  for  improvement  in  cities 


558  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

of  the  second  class,  by  inserting  in  Line  34  after  the  word 
'charged'  two  new  sentences  reading  as  follows:  'Pro- 
vided, that  before  any  suit  hereafter  may  be  brought  to 
enforce  the  lien,  of  any  special  tax  bill  which  has  been 
assigned,  written  notice  shall  be  filed  with  the  city  clerk 
setting  forth  a  specific  description  of  the  special  tax  bill, 
a  legal  description  of  the  property  it  covers,  and  the  name 
and  address  of  the  assignee  or  holders  of  said  tax  bill  at 
the  time  such  suit  is  brought.  Failure  to  file  such  notice 
shall  prevent  the  lien  of  such  special  tax  bill  from  being 
extended  by  reason  of  the  filing  of  such  suit.'  " 

On  March  29,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  215. 
I  call  attention  to  the  following:  Senate  Bill  No.  215 
amends  Section  6780,  Article  3,  Chapter  38,  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  by  inserting  two  new  sentences.  The  words 
"justice  of  the  peace"  appear  in  lines  83,  84,  98,  101,  114, 
and  117,  of  said  bill  and  should  have  been  changed  to  read 
"magistrate  court"  to  comply  with  the  provisions  of  the 
Constitution. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH  2i>,  W&B 
From  the  Jwrnoi  of  t/w>  Horn*  of  R&pr$#mt&tiv$»r  pp*  19*8*1099 


OFFICE  STATB  or  Missoum*  JJBTFIMON  Cn% 
March  29,  1948* 

To  the  Home  of  Representatives  of  the  84th  General  A$$embtu  q/ 
the  State  of  Missouri; 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Honte 
Bill  No.  120,  entitled; 

"AN  ACT 

*To  repeal  Sections  10361f   10852,   10353,   1QS&4* 
10355,  10356  and  10357  of  Article  2,  Chapter  72  of  tht 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  559 

Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  the  edu- 
cation, of  children  who  are  blind,  deaf,  crippled  or  other- 
wise handicapped,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  six  new 
sections  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter  to  be  known 
as  Sections  10351,  10352,  10353,  10354,  10355  and  10356." 

On,  March  29,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  126. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  Section  10353  of  Article 
2,  Chapter  72  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  was 
repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  100  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly  and  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1947,  Volume  I,  page  499.  Said  Section  10353  of  Article  2, 
Chapter  72  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  is  again 
repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No.  126  without  reference  being  made  to  its  repeal 
and  reenactment  by  Senate  Bill  No.  100. 

Section  10357,  Article  2,  Chapter  72  of  the  Revised  Stat- 
utes of  Missouri,  1939f  was  repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate 
Bill  No.  100  of  the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly  and  is 
found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  I,  at  page  500. 
Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  126  repeals 
Section  10357  of  Article  2,  Chapter  72  of  the  Revised  Statutes 
of  Missouri,  1939,  but  makes  no  reference  to  its  having  been 
repealed  and  reenacted  by  Senate  Bill  No.  100  found  in  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  I,  at  page  500*  However,  the  sub- 
stance contained  in  Section  10357,  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947, 
Volume  If  page  500,  is  found  in  Section  10356  of  Senate  Com- 
mitee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  No,  126, 

Respectfully  submitted* 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY! 
Governor* 


560  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  2,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  >STATE  OF  Missouai,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  2,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

C.  Rouss  Gallop,  Mexico,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri,  Division  of 
Health  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  for 
a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice,  Doctor 
Major  G*  Seelig,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AHII&  5,  1048 
Prom  the  J&wm&t  o/  th®  S«n&t&p  pp* 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  Mmmmt,  J$froii3<w  Cn% 
April  8»  1948* 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  Stote  &/ 
Missouri: 

1  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No,  219,  entitled** 

"AN  ACT 

**To  amend  Section  3745  of  tn  act  of  the  63rd  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  known  as  Senate  Bill  No»  248,  Laws  of 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  561 

Missouri,  1945,  Pages  1996  to  2004,  approved  on  July  1, 
1946,  relating  to  the  duties  of  employees  of  the  division 
of  Workmen's  Compensation  of  the  department  of  labor 
and  industrial  relations  and  to  the  duties  of  the  industrial 
commission,  by  striking  out  all  of  line  9  following  the 
word  'party.',  and  by  striking  out  all  of  lines  10,  11,  12, 
13,  14  and  15  of  said  section." 

On  April  5,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  219. 

I  have  approved  this  bill  However,  I  call  attention  to 
the  fact  that  the  line  numbers  are  not  correct  if  Section  3745, 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  found  on  pages  2000  and  2001  is 
followed* 

The  word  "party,"  referred  to  in  the  title  of  Senate  Bill 
No.  219,  is  not  in  line  "9"  of  Section  3745  but  is  in  line  "8" 
and  there  arc  no  lines  "14"  and  "15"  in  said  Section  3745. 
The  author  of  Senate  Bill  No.  219  evidently  used  the  Truly 
Agreed  To  and  Finally  Passed  Senate  Bill  No.  248  when 
drafting  Senate  Bill  No*  219  as  the  line  numbers  do  correspond 
with  the  line  numbers  in  said  Senate  Bill  No.  248  of  the  Sixty- 
third  General  Assembly* 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

APEKL  5,  1948 
From  th$  Journal  &f  thu  Home  of  R$pr$8&nt&t$v&8>  p* 


OFFICE,  STAW  OF  MISSOOTI,  JSWIESON  Cxw, 
April  6,  1048, 

To  the  Home  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri; 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No,  416,  entitled: 


562  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Article  5,  Chapter  72,  of  the  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to  laws  applicable  to 
city,  town  and  consolidated  schools,  by  inserting  imme- 
diately following  Section  10484  of  said  Article  5  one  new 
section  relating  to  the  authority  of  boards  of  city,  town 
or  village  school  districts  to  transport  pupils  of  annexed 
districts  to  the  proper  school,  to  be  known  as  Section 
10484a." 

On  April  5,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  416, 
Section  10484,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  re- 
ferred to  in  House  Bill  No.  416  was  repealed  and  reenacted  by 
the  Sixty-fourth  General  Assembly,  and  is  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1947,  Volume  I,  page  507, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  3VL  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AFEIL  7,  1048 
From  th®  Journal  &/  th$  S*na>t«,  pp» 


EXVCUTXTO  Omcs»  >STATO  or  Missouri, 
April  7,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  th%  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No,  280,  entitled; 

"AN  ACT 

'To  amend  Section  1 1040  of  an  Act  of  the  04th  Gen* 
eral  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  No,  77,  approved 
May  19,  I947#  relating  to  the  maximum  rates  of  taxation 
that  may  be  levied  by  county  courts,  by  adding  at  the 
end  of  the  section  the  following:  'County  courts  art 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  563 

hereby  authorized  to  call  and  conduct  a  special  election 
under  the  laws  governing  such  election  for  the  purpose 
of  increasing  maximum  tax  rates  herein  specified,  or  to 
submit  a  proposition  for  the  increase  of  such  rates  at  any 
regular  election,  and  shall  submit  any  such  proposition  at 
either  a  special  or  regular  election  when  petitioned  there- 
for by  not  less  than  ten  per  cent  of  the  qualified  voters 
of  the  county  as  determined  by  the  total  vote  cast  for 
Governor  in  the  last  preceding  general  election  for  Gov- 
ernor, and  the  proposition  shall  be  as  follows  on  the 

ballot:    "For  a  levy  for  county  purposes  of on 

the  hundred  dollars  valuation"  and  '* Against  a  levy  for 

county  purposes  of on  the  hundred  dollars 

valuation."  Special  elections  called  under  the  provisions 
of  this  section  shall  be  limited  to  one  election  for  each 
twelve  month  period.  The  County  Court  shall  publish 
a  notice  of  said  election  in  some  newspaper  published  in 
said  county  in  the  following  manner:  If  a  daily  paper, 
for  seven  successive  days,  and  if  a  weekly  newspaper,  in 
two  issues  thereof,  and  the  election  shall  be  held  not  less 
than  five,  nor  more  than  ten,  days,  from  the  last  insertion 
thereof.  Provided,  that  in  all  counties  having  a  Board 
of  Election  Commissioners  such  election  when  called  by 
the  County  Court  shall  be  conducted  by  the  Board  of 
Election  Commissioners  as  provided  by  law',  with  an 
emergency  clause/* 

On  April  7,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  280. 

Section  11046  of  House  Bill  No,  77  of  the  Sixty-fourth 
General  Assembly  referred  to  in  Senate  Bill  No.  280  is  found 
in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  1»  page  539, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  3Vt  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


564  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  7,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  7,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri; 

1  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  287,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  7658,  an  Act  of  the  64th  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  relating  to  appointment  of  police  officers 
and  police  officials,  their  salaries,  preference  of  ex-service- 
men and  to  the  assignment  of  ranks  and  the  creation  of 
a  traffic  squad  in  cities  which  now  have  or  may  hereafter 
have  three  hundred  thousand  and  less  than  five  hundred 
thousand  inhabitants,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new 
section  to  be  known  as  Section  7658,  relating  to  the  same 
subject/' 

On  April  7,  1948f  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  287. 

The  title  and  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No,  2H7  are  very 
indefinite.  The  title  and  Section  1  of  Senate  Hill  No*  287 
refer  to  Section  7658*  an  act  of  the  84th  General  Assembly* 
etc*  No  reference  is  made  as  to  where  the  act  of  the  Mth 
General  Assembly  may  be  found,  whether  or  not  it  in  a  House 
Bill  or  a  Senate  Bill  or  the  number  of  the  bill  However,  there 
is  a  Section  7058  relating  to  appointment  of  police  officers  mid 
police  officials,  their  salaries,  etc.,  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947, 
Volume  lf  page  407,  which  evidently  is  the  "Act  of  the  64th 
General  Assembly*1  referred  to  in  the  title  and  Section  I  of 
Senate  Bill  No.  287. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  1VL  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  565 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  7,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  2069-2070 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  7,  1948. 

To  the   Senate  of  the  64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  Senate  Bill  No.  316,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  9451  of  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly,  approved  April  24,  1945,  found  in 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1351,  relating  to  pensions 
to  blind  persons  by  striking  out  the  words  and  figures 
'nine  hundred  ($900,00)  dollars*  in  lines  12  and  13  and 
line  17  and  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  the  words  and  figures 
'twelve  hundred  ($1,200.00)  dollars'/' 

On  April  7,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  316, 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  the  word  "commission" 
in  line  28,  page  2,  Section  9451  should  have  been  changed  to 
Division  of  Welfare  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 
Welfare. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONTNELLY, 
Governor. 


566  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL  7,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hov>$e  of  Representatives,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  7,  1948. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of 
the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  79,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  an  Act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
known  as  House  Bill  No.  652,  approved  March  29,  1946, 
relating  to  the  state  sales  tax,  by  adding  a  new  section 
providing  for  the  establishment  of  a  Sales  Tax  Token 
Revolving  Fund  to  follow  Section  11413,  to  be  known  as 
Section  11413a." 

On  April  7,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  79, 
An  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  known  us  House 
Bill  No.  652,  approved  March  29,  1946,  referred  to  in  House 
Bill  No.  79,  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1805. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

AmiL  7,  !®4S 
From  Wy  /<wm&$  o/  th&  Hm§$  of  R^yre^ni^ti^m,  pp.  fit 7 


Office  STATS  or  MisiotM,  Jimnoir  Cmr* 
April  7t  IMS, 

To  the  H&um  of  R$pment®tim  of  the  84th  General 
of  the  State  of  Mmmri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No*  105,  entii!@d; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  567 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  1  of  the  Act  of  the  Sixty-third 
General  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  No.  975,  approved 
July  6,  1946,  relating  to  taxation  of  manufacturers,  and 
to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section,  relating  to  the  same 
subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Section  1." 

On  April  7,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  165. 
Section  1  of  an  act  of  the  Sixty-third  General  Assembly 
known  as  House  Bill  No.  975,  approved  July  6,  1946,  referred 
to  in  House  Bill  No.  165,  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945, 
page  1954. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

AHUL  7,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hou&e  of  Representatives,  j 


Omen,  STATB  or  MISSOXJKI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  7,  1948. 

To  the  Home  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  167,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  11049,  11053  and  11054  of  an 
Act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  knowix  as  House  Bill 
No,  530f  approved  November  30*  1945,  relating  to  mak- 
ing of  the  tax  books,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  three 
naw  sections,  relating  to  the  same  subject,  to  be  known 
a§  Sections  11049,  11053  and  11054.1* 

On  April  7,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  107. 
Sections  11040,  11053,  and  11054  of  an  act  of  the  63rd 
Gtaertl  Astembly  known  m  House  Bill  No,  530,  approved 


568  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

November  30,  1945,  referred  to  in  House  Bill  No.  167,  are 
found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  pages  1818  and  1819. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL  18,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hou$e  of  Representatives,  p* 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEPJTOSON  CITY, 
April  18,  1948. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No*  78,  entitled; 

"AN  ACT 

**To  repeal  Section  83  of  an  Act  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  known  as  Senate  Bill  No,  297*  approved  April 
26,  1040,  relating  to  the  procurement  and  handling  of 
paper  for  state  printing  by  the  state  purchasing  agent, 
and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof  one  new  section*  relating  to 
the  same  subject  and  providing  a  revolving  fund  for  the 
use  of  the  state  purchasing  agent  in  buying  paper  for  the 
state,  to  be  known  as  Section  83/# 

On  April  13t  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No,  78, 
Section  83  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  Genera)  Assembly  known 
as  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for  Senile  Bill  No,  297,  ap* 
proved  April  28,  1940,  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri*  1945, 
page  1455. 

Respectfully  submitted, 
PHIL  M« 
Governor- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  569 


TO  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

APKIL  18,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp^  $129-2180 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  13,  1948. 

To  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  64th  General  Assembly 
of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

I  return  to  you  House  Bill  No.  258,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  11411  and  11416  contained  in 
House  Bill  No.  274  enacted  by  the  64th  General  Assem- 
bly and  Sections  11412,  11417  and  11420  contained  in 
House  Bill  No*  652  enacted  by  the  63rd  General  Assem- 
bly, relating  to  sales  tax  and  known  as  the  Sales  Tax  Act 
and  to  enact  five  new  sections  in  lieu  thereof  relating  to 
the  same  subject  matter  to  be  known  as  Sections  11411, 
114 12f  11410,  11417  and  11420,  respectively,  and  to  trans- 
fer the  collection  of  sales  tax  on  motor  vehicles  from 
vendors  thereof  to  the  Directors  of  Revenue  and  provid- 
ing procedures  thereof,  to  levy  an  additional  tax  for  the 
use  of  the  highways  of  the  state  by  motor  vehicles,  and 
to  provide  exemptions  therefrom." 

On  April  13,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  258, 
Sections  11411  and  11410  contained  in  House  Bill  No,  274 
enacted  by  the  04th  General  Assembly  are  found  in  Laws  of 
Missouri  1947,  pages  553  and  555;  Sections  11412,  11417, 
and  11420  contained  in  House  Bill  No.  652  enacted  by  the 
63rd  General  Assembly  are  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945, 
pages  1870  and  1872, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


570  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

APRIL  29,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p,  $101 

EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
April  29,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

John  H.  Flanigan,  Jr.,  Republican,  Carthage,  Missouri* 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a  term  end- 
ing July  1,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and 
qualified;  vice,  John  H.  Flanigan,  Jr.,  resigned  and  raippointed. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONKHLLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SECHKTAHY  OF  STATE 

MAT  6,  1948 
From  th$  Jowrn&l  of  th$  80na£*»  pp, 


E3C8X3UTIVIJ  QOTCi,  STATE  OF  MlMDUR!,  JOTmmN  ClTY, 

May  8,  IMS, 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  132*  entitled: 

I4AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
repealing  and  reenacting  Section  13404  of  Article  2»  Chap- 
ter 99,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  571 

the  fees  of  the  judges  and  clerks  of  the  probate  courts, 
the  disposition  thereof  and  the  duties  of  such  judges  and 
clerks  with  respect  thereto,  known  as  Senate  Bill  No.  200, 
approved  by  the  Governor  on  July  6,  1946,  and  to  enact 
in  lieu  thereof  a  new  section  relating  to  the  same  subject 
matter  to  be  known  as  Section  13404," 

On  May  6,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  132, 
The  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly*  referred  to  in  the 

title  and  in  Section  1  of  Senate  Bill  No*  132,  is  found  in  Lawa 

of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1516. 

The  reference  in  Senate  Bill  No.  132  to  "Senate  Bill  No, 
200/1  in  Hue  ?  of  the  title  of  the,  printed  bill,  should  be  "Sen- 
ate Committee  Substitute  for  Senate  Bill  No.  200."  This 
same  mistake  appears  in  Hue  6  of  Section  1. 

The  message  returning  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
Senate  Dill  No.  2(X)  to  the  Senate  i»  found  in  the  Senate  Journal 
of  July  8,  1040,  paga  4115,  printed  bound  Volume  111  of  the 
Sixty-third  General  Assembly.  The  following  notation  was 

included  in  mid 


"However,  1  call  attention  to  the  words  'state  treasurer* 
on  page  4»  lina  80  of  Section  13404*  I  am  of  tha  opinion 
that  this  should  be  *director  of  revenue1/* 

Said  mistake  appears  in  Senate  Bill  No*  132  of  the  Sixty- 
fourth  General  Assembly,  Section  13404*  page  4#  line  82,  The 
wordi  "state  treasurer*9  should  hive  been  changed  to  **dire€tor 
of  revenue.1* 

A  mlittkt  alto  was  mtda  in  compiling  th«  Laws  of  1945* 
page  1519,  In  Une  4  on  page  1519*  the  words  **Director  of 
Ravenna  fl  were  inserted  in  brackets  aftar  the  word  "treasurer11 
and  before  the  word  "in."  This  insertion  in  bracket!  should 

hftva  on  piga  t§!§»  line  37,  after  the  word  **traa§* 

tiw*1  and  befori  tha  word  "or/1 

Rttptetfutly  submitted, 
PMIL  M. 


572  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  6,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  6,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  247,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly 
known  as  House  Bill  No.  775,  approved  March  7,  1946, 
relating  to  the  compensation  of  the  circuit  clerk  and 
recorder  in  counties  of  the  Third  Class  wherein  the  two 
offices  shall  have  been  combined,  for  deputies  and  clerks 
in  such  office  and  the  compensation  therefor,  by  insert- 
ing immediately  following  Section  6  of  said  House  Bill 
No.  775  one  new  section  providing  additional  duties  for 
such  circuit  clerk  and  recorder  as  recorder  of  the  county 
in  the  listing  of  discharged  veterans  by  recorders  and  the 
manner  and  conditions  of  such  listing  and  prescribing  a 
fee  for  such  services  to  be  known  as  Section  6a/' 

On  May  6,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  247. 

The  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  known  as  House 
Bill  No*  775,  approved  March  7,  1946,  referred  to  in  Senate 
Bill  No.  247,  is  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1532, 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  573 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  6,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  21O7 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  6,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  295,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  amend  Section  5  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  entitled  'An  Act  to  provide  for  and  fix  the 
salaries  of  judges  of  probate  courts  in  counties  now  or 
hereafter  having  more  than  30,000  inhabitants,  and  to 
provide  for  the  appointment,  discharge  and  pay  of  clerks 
of  probate  courts  in  such  counties,  and  to  provide  for  the 
payment  of  fees  of  probate  courts  in  such  counties  to  the 
county  and  to  provide  for  payment  of  excess  fees  into  the 
school  fund  of  the  county,  and  to  provide  for  effective 
date/,  approved  July  6,  1946,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri, 
1945,  page  1514,  by  inserting  in  line  19  of  said  section 
after  the  figure  '$4800,00;'  and  before  the  word  *and'  the 
following:  'except  that  in  counties  where  probate  courts 
may  be  held  in  more  than  one  place  in  any  county,  the 
county  court  may,  at  the  cost  of  the  county,  provide  such 
additional  clerks,  deputy  clerks  or  other  employees  as 
may  be  required  by  the  Probate  Court  and  may  provide 
funds  for  payment  of  salaries  or  parts  of  salaries  of  such 
officers  or  employees  in  addition  to  the  amounts  fixed  by 
this  section  ;V 

On  May  6,  194S,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  295. 
I  believe  that  the  figure  "19"  in  line  12  of  the  title  should 
be  "18/1    This  same  mistake  appears  in  line  11,  Section  1, 

page  2*  Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


574  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  10,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  10,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  haixd  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  32,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  1  and  2  of  an  Act  of  the  63rd 
General  Assembly,  approved  July  23,  1946,  known,  and 
designated  as  Committee  Substitute  for  House  Bill  214, 
such  sections  relating  respectively  to  the  creation  of  a 
County  Aid  Road  Fund  for  specified  purposes  and  to  the 
formulation  of  plans  by  the  State  Highway  Commission 
and  a  committee  of  five  (5)  county  judges  selected  by  the 
Governor,  and  to  enact  two  new  sections  in  lieu  thereof 
to  be  known  and  designated  as  Sections  1  and  2,  relating 
to  the  same  subjects  and  providing  for  the  payment  of 
per  diem  and  expenses  of  such  committee  of  five  (5) 
county  judges,  and  general  administrative  expenses/* 

On  May  10,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No,  32- 
Sections  1  and  2  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly, 
approved  July  23,  1946,  known  and  designated  as  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  214,  referred  to  in  House  Bill 
No.  32,  are  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1472. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  575 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  10,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Hoiise  of  Representatives,  pp.  2148-8149 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 

May  10,  1948. 
To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  390,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  12137,  12138  and  12139  of  Arti- 
cle 23,  Chapter  76,  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939, 
relating  to  duties  of  clerks,  to  delivery  of  ballot  to  voters 
and  how  they  are  to  be  marked,  and  to  duties  of  judges, 
in  elections  in  cities  of  not  less  than  300,000  nor  more 
than  700,000  inhabitants,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  thereof 
three  new  sections  to  be  known  as  Section  12137,  12138 
and  12139,  relating  to  the  same  subject  and  providing 
for  identification  of  voters,  certificates  of  identification, 
and  use  of  the  latter  as  poll  lists  in  lieu  of  poll  books." 

On  May  10,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  390. 

At  the  top  of  page  3,  of  the  printed  bill,  line  17,  are  the 
words  and  figures  "GENERAL  ELECTION  NOVEMBER 
1946*"*  As  this  is  part  of  a  suggested  form,  I  am  of  the  opinion 
that  the  figures  "1946"  should  not  have  been  used  but  that 
the  form  should  have  been  "19 — ~ — " 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


576  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  11,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate ,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  11,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  152,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  5628  and  5630,  Article  3,  Chapter 
35  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  relating  to 
the  powers  of  the  public  service  commission  in  respect 
to  common  carriers,  railroads  and  street  railroads,  and  to 
enact  in  lieu  thereof  three  (3)  new  sections  relating  to 
the  same  subject  matter  to  be  known  as  Sections  5628 
and  5630." 

On  May  11,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No,  152. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  in  line  6  of  the  title  and 
in  line  5  of  Section  1,  the  word  and  figure  "three  (3)"  appear, 
but  as  one  section  was  stricken  out  of  the  bill  on  perfection 
in  the  Senate,  the  word  and  figure  "three  (3)"  should  have 
been  changed  to  "two  (2)."  However,  I  do  not  think  this 
fatal  to  the  validity  of  the  bill 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  577 


TO  THE  SENATE 

MAY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2102 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  19,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Russell  L.  Dearmont,  Democrat,  4954  Lindell,  St.  Louis, 
Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  South- 
east Missouri  State  College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
Orville  Zimmerman,  deceased. 

C,  D,  Matthews,  3rd,  Republican,  Sikeston,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  Board  of  Regents  for  the  Southeast  Missouri 
State  College,  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  January  1,  1953,  and  until 
his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  R.  E. 
Bailey,  deceased. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  21,  1948 
From  the  Jowrmt  of  the  Htnw  of  Repr$8mt&Uve&,  $p* 


OFFICE  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  On% 
Hay  21,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  449,  entitled: 


578  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  for  the  payment  of  wages, 
salaries,  per  diem  of  the  officers  and  employees;  for  the 
original  purchase  of  property;  for  the  repair  and  replace- 
ment of  property;  for  the  operating  and  general  expenses 
of  the  Department  of  Revenue  and  the  several  divisions 
thereof;  for  the  payment  of  the  state's  part  in  assessing 
and  collecting  revenue,  for  the  period  beginning  July  1, 
1948  and  ending  June  30,  1949." 

On  May  21,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  449. 

On  page  5,  Section  3.071,  lines  5  and  6,  are  the  words  and 
figures  "for  the  period  beginning  June  1,  1948  and  ending  June 
30,  1949."  I  believe  this  should  be  "for  the  period  begin- 
ning July  1,  1948  and  ending  June  30,  1949," 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  21,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  Cmr, 
May  21,  1948, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No*  454,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  appropriate  money  far  the  pay  of  salaries  of 
members  of  the  64th  General  Assemblies  and  contingent 
expenses  of  the  64th  and  65th  General  Assemblies;  includ-* 
ing  salaries  of  elective  and  appointive  officers  and  for  the 
salaries  and  expenses  of  members  and  employees  and 
clerical  hire  of  the  committee  on  Legislative  Research; 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  579 

and  for  the  salaries  of  the  secretaries  and  clerks  and  other 
necessary  expenses  of  the  Missouri  Commission  on  Inter- 
state Cooperation  for  the  period  beginning  July  1,  1948 
and  ending  June  30,  1949." 

On  May  21,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  454. 
Section  8.010  of  House  Bill  No.  454  appropriates  out  of 
the  State  Treasury  $282,000  to  pay  the  salaries  of  the  members 
of  the  64th  and  65th  General  Assemblies  for  the  period  July 
1,  1948,  to  June  30,  1949,  However,  in  the  title,  lines  two 
and  three,  it  reads  as  follows:  "To  appropriate  money  for 
the  pay  of  salaries  of  members  of  the  64th  General  Assem- 
blies." The  title  should  have  included  the  65th  General 
Assembly  in  line  3. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  26,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  th&  S&n&te,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  26,  1948, 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir;    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No,  272,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

'To  repeal  Sections  9683a  and  9683b  of  an  act  of 
the  63rd  General  Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  832 
approved  March  7,  1946,  relating  to  the  salaries  of  pro- 
bation officers,  deputies,  clerks  and  stenographers  in 
counties  of  class  one  and  to  enact  three  new  sections  in 
lieu  thereof  to  be  known  as  Sections  9683a,  9683b  and 
9683c>  relating  to  the  same  subject/' 


580  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

On  May  26,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  272. 

Sections  9683a  and  9683b  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General 
Assembly  known  as  House  Bill  832  approved  March  7,  1946, 
are  found  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  631. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  26,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
May  26,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir:    I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Bill  No.  298,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Sections  Two,  Three,  Four  and  Six  of  an 
Act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly  designated  as  House 
Bill  962,  as  the  same  appears  on  Page  1311  of  the  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1945,  relating  to  the  appointment  atxd  salaries 
of  deputy  collectors  and  assistants  in  the  office  of  the 
collector  of  revenue  in  constitutional  charter  cities  not 
within  a  county  and  the  fees  to  be  collected  by  the  col- 
lector of  revenue  and  their  use,  and  to  enact  in  lieu  there- 
of four  new  sections  relating  to  the  same  subject  matter/' 

On  May  26,  1948,  I  approved  said  Senate  Bill  No.  298, 
It  is  my  opinion  that  the  word  "each"  should  have  been 

inserted  in,  line  22,  page  3,  Section,  3,  after  the  word  "shall" 

and  before  the  word  "receive." 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  581 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

MAY  28,  1948 
From  the  Jmirnal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2164-2165 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON 
May  28,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  Senate  Committee  Substitute  for 
House  Bill  No,  475,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  enable  certain  cities  to  obtain  additional  reve- 
nue by  authorizing  any  constitutional  charter  city  in  this 
state  which  now  has  or  may  hereafter  acquire  a  popula- 
tion in  excess  of  700,000  inhabitants  to  levy  and  collect 
by  ordinance  for  general  revenue  purposes  an  earnings  tax 
on  salaries,  wages,  commissions  and  other  compensation 
earned  by  its  residents;  on  salaries,  wages,  commissions 
and  other  compensation  earned  by  non-residents  of  the 
city  for  work  done  or  services  performed  or  rendered  in 
the  city;  on  the  net  profits  of  associations,  businesses  or 
other  activities  conducted  by  residents;  on  the  net  profits 
of  associations,  businesses  or  other  activities  conducted  in 
the  city  by  non-residents;  and  on  the  net  profits  earned 
by  all  corporations  as  the  result  of  work  done  or  services 
performed  or  rendered  and  business  or  other  activities 
conducted  in  the  city;  providing  that  the  rate  of  tax  shall 
not  exceed  one-half  of  one-percentum  of  any  earnings  or 
profits  subject  to  the  tax;  prescribing  the  method  for 
ascertaining  the  taxable  net  profits  of  any  non-resident 
individual  of  any  association  or  business  conducted  by 
non-residents,  or  of  any  corporation,  in  any  case  in  which 
the  work  done,  services  performed  or  rendered,  and  busi- 
ness or  other  activities  conducted  are  done,  performed, 
rendered  or  conducted  both  within  and  without  the  city; 


582  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

defining  net  profits  subject  to  tax;  permitting  any  em- 
ployer required  to  collect  and  remit  the  tax  of  employees 
to  retain  from  the  remittance  the  cost  of  collection,  pro- 
vided no  more  than  ten  per  cent  of  the  amount  collected 
be  retained  in  any  event;  defining  by  reference  to  the 
state  income  tax  law  certain  types  of  income  not  subject 
to  tax  under  this  Act;  prohibiting  any  requirement  that 
a  taxpayer  file  copies  of  state  and  federal  income  tax  re- 
turns in  aid  of  the  administration  of  any  tax  ordinance 
enacted  pursuant  to  this  Act;  and  declaring  that  the  in- 
validity of  any  portion  of  this  Act,  except  the  whole  of 
Section  1,  shall  not  affect  the  validity  of  the  remainder; 
and  limiting  the  duration  of  the  provisions  of  this  Act,'1" 

On  May  28,  1948,  I  approved  said  Seriate  Committee 
Substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  475. 

I  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  on  page  2  of  the  title,  in, 
line  9,  it  is  provided  that  any  employer  required  to  collect 
and  remit  the  tax  of  employees  may  retain  from  the  remittance 
the  cost  of  collection,  provided  no  more  than  ten  per  cent  of 
the  amount  collected  be  retained  in  any  event;  while  in  Sec- 
tion 4,  page  3,  line  4,  it  is  provided  that  the  employer  shall 
be  entitled  to  retain  three  per  cent  of  the  total  amount  col- 
lected. The  substitute  for  House  Bill  No.  475,  as  originally 
written,  provided  for  ten  per  cent  as  stated  in  the  title  but 
this  was  reduced  to  three  per  cent  by  an  amendment  on  per- 
fection in  the  Senate,  as  shown  in  Section  4,  line  4,  of  the  bill* 
However,  the  title  was  not  corrected  to  correspond  with  the 
amendment.  As  the  amendment  was  less  than  the  amount 
provided  in  the  title,  I  do  not  believe  that  it  affects  the  validity 
of  the  bill 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  583 


TO  THE  SECRETARY  OF  STATE 

JUNE  2,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  pp.  2168-2169 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
June  2,  1948. 

To  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  State  of  Missouri: 

Sir: 

I  hand  you  herewith  House  Bill  No.  466,  entitled: 

"AN  ACT 

"To  repeal  Section  9422,  Article  2,  Chapter  52,  Re- 
vised Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an  act 
of  the  61st  General  Assembly,  approved  June  20,  1941, 
found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  566;  to  amend 
Section  9423,  Article  2,  Chapter  52,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an  act  of  the  61st  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  approved  June  20,  1941,  found  at  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1941,  page  566,  and  as  further  amended  by  an 
act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly,  approved  July  15, 
1943,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  917,  by  strik- 
ing out  all  of  paragraph  (c)  in  lines  14  to  24  thereof  and 
by  inserting  in  lieu  thereof  a  new  paragraph  (c)  defining 
the  term  'Benefit  year';  to  repeal  Sections  9426  and  9432 
of  an  act  of  the  63rd  General  Assembly,  approved  May 
3,  1946,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1731;  to 
repeal  Sections  9427  and  9429  of  an  act  of  the  63rd  Gen- 
eral Assembly  approved  January  30,  1946,  found  at  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1945,  page  1744;  to  repeal  Sections  9430  of 
Article  2,  Chapter  52,  of  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Mis- 
souri, 1939,  as  amended  by  an  act  of  the  61st  General 
Assembly,  approved  June  20,  1941,  found  at  Laws  of 
Missouri,  1941,  and  as  further  amended  by  an  act  of  the 
62nd  General  Assembly,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943, 
page  566,  and  as  further  amended  by  an  act  of  the  64th 
General  Assembly,  approved  July  7,  1947,  found  at  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1947,  page  523;  and  also  to  repeal  Sections 


584  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

9431  and  9436  of  Article  2,  Chapter  52  of  the  Revised 
Statutes  of  Missouri,  1939,  as  amended  by  an  act  of  the 
61st  General  Assembly,  approved  June  20,  1941,  found  at 
Laws  of  Missouri,  1941,  page  566,  and  as  further  amended 
by  an  act  of  the  62nd  General  Assembly,  approved  July 
15,  1943,  found  at  Laws  of  Missouri,  1943,  page  917;  all 
of  said  sections  being  relating  to  the  unemployment  com- 
pensation system  of  the  State  of  Missouri  and  to  the  col- 
lection of  contributions  and  payment  of  benefits  under 
the  unemployment  compensation  law,  and  to  enact  in 
lieu  of  said  repealed  sections  eight  new  sections  relating 
to  the  same  subject  matter,  to  be  known  as  Sections  9422, 
9426,  9427,  9429,  9430,  9431,  9432,  and  9436." 

On  July  2,  1948,  I  approved  said  House  Bill  No.  466. 

I  wish  to  call  attention  to  the  following  errors  which 
appear  in  this  bill: 

In  the  title  to  House  Bill  No.  466,  on  page  2,  line  7,  the 
figures  "566"  should  be  "933."  This  same  error  appears  on 
page  15,  Section  3,  line  11. 

On  page  11,  line  258,  the  word  "of  between  the  word 
"payment"  and  the  word  "remuneration"  was  inserted  in  place 
of  the  word  "or";  on  page  13,  line  321,  the  word  "unit"  be- 
tween the  word  "employing"  and  the  word  "for"  was  inserted 
in  place  of  the  word  "suit."  It  should  be  borne  in  mind  that 
House  Bill  No.  466  amends  Section  9423,  Revised  Statutes  of 
Missouri,  1939,  as  amended,  and  that  ixo  words  can  be  inserted 
or  changed  in  said  section  except  those  specifically  stated  in 
the  title  or  in  the  enacting  section* 

".  .  .  No  act  shall  be  amended  by  providing  that 
words  be  stricken  out  or  inserted,  but  the  words  to  be 
stricken  out,  or  the  words  to  be  inserted,  or  the  words 
to  be  stricken  out  and  those  inserted  in  lieu  thereof,  to- 
gether with  the  act  or  section  amended,  shall  be  set  forth 
in  full  as  amended."  (Section  28,  Article  III,  Constitu- 
tion.) 

The  title  of  this  bill  (House  Bill  No,  466)  defined  the  term 
"benefit  year"  and  if  this  can  be  done  without  setting  forth 
the  definition  of  "benefit  year"  in  full,  which  I  seriously  doubt, 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  585 

certainly  no  other  words  now  appearing  in  said  section  in  Laws 
of  Missouri,  1943,  page  917,  can  be  changed  or  inserted. 

On  page  36,  line  25,  Section  9430,  the  article  "a"  after 
the  word  "this"  and  before  the  word  "subsection,"  is  an,  error; 
it  does  not  appear  in  Laws  of  Missouri,  1947,  Volume  I,  page 
523,  the  present  section. 

On  page  39,  lines  92  and  95,  Section  9431,  the  word  "Sub- 
section" before  the  figures  "(2)"  and  "(3)"  should  have  been 
deleted.  These  paragraphs  were  inserted  in  Section  9431  by 
House  Committee  Amendment  No.  12  on  perfection  of  the 
bill  in  the  House.  I  believe  this  is  the  only  instance  in  the 
Unemployment  Compensation  Law  where  a  paragraph  is  shown 
as  a  subsection  and  is  a  deviation  from  the  present  form. 

On  page  48,  line  61,  Section  9436,  a  comma  ","  and  the 
words  "such  assessment"  were  omitted  after  the  word  "reas- 
sessment," in  lines  60  and  61.  I  believe  the  omission  of  the 
words  **such  assessment"  in  line  61  was  an  error  but  probably 
will  not  complicate  an  interpretation  of  said  section. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JUNE  7,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p,  &IS1 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFEBSON  CITY, 
June  7,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office; 

Bryan  E.  Wolfeubarger,  Wheaton,  Missouri,  as  a  member 
of  the  State  Board  of  Barber  Examiners,  Division  of  Regis- 
tration and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for 


586  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

a  term  ending  July  6,  1949,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  J.  E.  Johnston,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19;  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948. 

To  the  Senate   of  the   64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Roger  S,  Miller,  660  Romany  Road,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Police  Commissioners  for 
Kansas  City,  Missouri,  for  a  term  ending  July  8,  1952,  and 
until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment.  Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p*  $18% 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE:  OF  MISBOUBI,  JEFFEBSON  Cn% 
July  19,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  587 

Robert  A.  Huelsick,  1700  Boatmen's  Bank  Building,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  State  Board  of 
Accountancy,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  five  years  from 
the  time  of  his  appointment  and  qualification  and  until  his 
successor  is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  J.  J.  Lang, 
term  expired. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1948 
From  the  Jou/rnal  of  the  Senate,  p.  SIS 2 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948, 

To  the   Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  James  M.  Hern,  Republican,  Columbia,  Missouri, 
as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Chiropody,  Division  of 
Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Educa- 
tion, for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1952,  and  until  his  successor 
is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


588  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  %1SS 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOUEI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J.  E.  Mitchell,  Democrat,  39  Lewis  Place,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Education,  for  a 
term  ending  July  1,  1956,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JTOY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Sister  M.  Geraldine  Kulleck,  6420  Clayton  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and 
Registrars  of  Nurses,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examina* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  589 

tion,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July 
6,  1951,  and  until  her  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  reappointment. 

Doctor  William  C.  Weinsberg,  3451  Halliday  Avenue,  St. 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and 
Registrars  of  Nurses,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examina- 
tion, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July 
6,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  quali- 
fied; vice,  reappointment. 

Miss  Grace  Frauens,  5702  Eastwood,  Kansas  City,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars 
of  Nurses,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1951,  and 
until  her  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Miss  Ophelia  Mae  Perkins,  Springfield,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Board  of  Examiners  and  Registrars  of  Nurses, 
Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1951,  and  until  her 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  10,  1948 
From  the  Jowrnoi  wf  the  Senate,  p*  $134 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATK  OF  MISSOUEI,  JBFFBRSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 


590  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

Doctor  W.  0.  Finney,  Democrat,  Chaffee,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  State  Board  of  Medical  Examiners,  Divi- 
sion of  Registration,  and  Examination,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  1,  1952,  and  until  his 
successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reapp ointment. 

Doctor  Paul  A.  Knepper,  Republican,  2002  Ashland  Ave- 
nue, St.  Joseph,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  State  Board 
of  Medical  Examiners,  Division  of  Registration  and  Examina- 
tion, State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July 
1,  1952,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified; 
vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  21$ 4 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

J.  S.  Williamson,  Democrat,  Route  4,  Columbia,  Missouri, 
as  a  trustee  of  the  State  Board  of  Training  Schools,  Division 
of  Educational  Institutions,  Department  of  Corrections,  for  a 
term  ending  July  1,  1954,  and  until  his  successor  is  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  591 


TO  THE  SENATE 

JULY  19,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2135 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
July  19,  1948. 

To   the   Senate  of  the   64th   General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Ronnie  F.  Greenwell,  Hayti,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  State  Soil  Districts  Commission,  State  Department  of 
Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1951,  and  until  his  suc- 
cessor is  duly  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  4»  1948 
From  th$  Journal  of  th$  Sen&te,  p. 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFBESON  CITY, 
August  4,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Paul  G.  Steinbicker,  1304  Boland  Place,  St.  Louis  County* 
Missouri*  as  a  member  of  the  Personnel  Advisory  Board,  Per- 
sonnel Division  of  the  Department  of  Business  and  Admmis- 


592  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

tration,  for  a  term  ending  July  31,  1954,  and  until  his  successor 
is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  23,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  pp.  213&-&1S6 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  23,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Murray  Q.  Williams,  Warrensburg,  Missouri,  as  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Board  of  Pharmacy,  Division  of  Registration  and 
Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  end- 
ing August  16,  1953,  and  until  his  successor  is  duly  appointed 
and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M*  DONNELLY, 
Governor* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  593 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  30,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  213G 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OP  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
August  30,  1948. 

To  the   Senate  of  the   64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

V.  J.  O'Flaherty,  Jr.,  909  Baltimore  Avenue,  Kansas 
City,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Real  Estate  Com- 
mission, Division  of  Registration  and  Examination,  State 
Department  of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice, 
reappointment. 

Ray  R,  Dolan,  6401  Manchester  Avenue,  St.  Louis,  Mis- 
souri, as  a  member  of  the  Missouri  Real  Estate  Commission, 
Division  of  Registration,  and  Examination,  State  Department 
of  Education,  for  a  term  ending  July  6,  1951,  and  until  his 
successor  shall  be  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

AUGUST  80,  1048 
From  tk$  Jowmal  <>/  t&*  Senate,  f>* 


m  OFHCOB,  STAOT  or  Missotimi,  JUTTBESON  Cmr, 
August  SO,  1048, 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Mimouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 


594  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

J.  Raymond  Lucy,  Parma,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
State  Highway  Commission  for  a  term  ending  March  29,  1951, 
and  until  his  successor  is  appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  Paul 
C.  Jones,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


TO  THE  SENATE 

(SEPTEMBER  23,  1948 

From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  21 3 7 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
September  23,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointments  to  office: 

Dr.  Everett  D.  Sugarbaker,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as 
a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri, 
Division  of  Health  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and 
Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor; 
vice,  Frank  T,  Hodgdon,  resigned, 

Dr.  William  Leighton,  3720  Washington  Boulevard,  St 
Louis,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the  Cancer  Commission  for 
the  State  of  Missouri,  Division  of  Health  of  the  Department 
of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  for  a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure 
of  the  Governor;  vice,  Dr.  Clifton  Smith,  resigned- 
Mr.  Cres  Hewitt,  Shelbyville,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of 
the  Cancer  Commission  for  the  State  of  Missouri,  Division  of 
Health  of  the  Department  of  Public  Health  and  Welfare,  for 
a  term  ending  at  the  pleasure  of  the  Governor;  vice>  W.  Ed, 
Jameson,  resigned. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY* 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  595 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  14,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  2137 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  14,  1948. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Rolla  E.  Stephens,  Joplin,  Missouri,  as  a  member  of  the 
Missouri  Real  Estate  Commission,  Division  of  Registration 
and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a  term 
ending  October  13,  1951,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

PHIL  M,  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


596  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 


TO  THE  SENATE 

OCTOBER  18,  1948 
From  the  Journal  of  the  Senate,  p.  21S8 


EXECUTIVE  OFFICE,  STATE  OF  MISSOURI,  JEFFERSON  CITY, 
October  18,  19'48. 

To  the  Senate  of  the  64th  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Missouri: 

I  have  the  honor  to  transmit  to  you  herewith  for  your 
consent  and  approval  the  following  appointment  to  office: 

Doctor  R.  R.  Rhoades,  Jefferson  City,  Missouri,  as  a 
member  of  the  Missouri  Dental  Board,  Division  of  Registra- 
tion and  Examination,  State  Department  of  Education,  for  a 
term  ending  October  16,  1953,  and  until  his  successor  shall  be 
appointed  and  qualified;  vice,  reappointment. 

Respectfully  submitted, 
PHIL  M.  DONNELLY, 
Governor. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  597 


MEMORANDA  OF  PROCLAMATIONS  AND 
WRITS  OF  ELECTION 


JANUARY  23,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  118 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election,  directing  that 
an  election  be  held  on  Tuesday,  February  27,  1945,  for  the 
purpose  of  electing  a  State  Senator  for  the  Ninth  Senatorial 
District  to  supply  a  vacancy  caused  by  the  resignation  of 
Honorable  Frank  P.  Briggs. 


JANUAEY  29,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  12$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  designating  Feb- 
ruary 3»  4  and  5,  1945,  the  Fourth  Anniversary  of  Incorpora- 
tion of  United  Service  Organization. 


FEBKUA&Y  1,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Givtt  Proceedingat  1$44~1W,  #• 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  for  vigorous  recruit- 
ing drive  to  enlist  women  for  Women's  Army  Corps  Medical 
Units  for  service  at  Army's  Hospital 


MABOH  7,  1945 
From  the  R*gi*t*r  of  CMl 


The  Governor  proclaimed  March  9, 1945,  the  Third  Axmi~ 
vertary  of  the  Army  Service  Forces* 


598  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

MARCH  8,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  proclaiming  Wild- 
life Restoration  Week,  March  18-24,  1945. 


MARCH  12,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944^1947,  p.  155 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  for  an  election 
to  be  held  Tuesday,  March  27,  1945,  in  Platte  County,  Mo., 
to  fill  a  vacancy  in  the  House  of  Representatives  caused  by 
the  death  of  Honorable  J.  W.  Farley. 


MARCH  23,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-^1947,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  declaring  that  pro- 
posed New  Constitution  was  adopted  by  a  majority  of  quali- 
fied voters  of  State  of  Missouri  in  a  special  election  held  on 
Tuesday,  February  27,  1945. 


APBIL  4,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  l$44»1947f  p* 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  designating  April  as 
Cancer  Control  Month. 


APBIL  6,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Ctmi  Procwctinff*,  l$44«d$4?>  p, 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  April,  1045,  m 
United  Clothing  Collectors  Month  in  Missouri 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  599 

APRIL  12,  194$ 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  17S 


The  Governor  proclaimed  April  13,  1945,  as  "Jefferson 
Day"  in  commemoration  of  the  homage  due  Thomas  Jeffer- 
son, on  the  anniversary  of  his  birthday. 


APRIL  13,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944^1947,  p.  179 


The  Governor 'issued  a  Proclamation,  in  part  as  follows: 

"Whereas,  The  nation  and  world  are  mourning  the  un- 
timely death  of  our  Great  President,  Franklin  Delano  Roose- 
velt, and 

Whereas,  This  nation  is  bowed  with  the  weight  of  its 
crushing  loss,  and 

Whereas,  It  is  proper  that  suitable  observance  and  trib- 
utes of  respect  be  paid  to  the  memory  and  service  of  our 
beloved  President;  Now  Therefore, 

I»  Phil  M.  Donnelly,  Governor  of  the  State  of  Missouri, 
do  hereby  proclaim  that  on  Saturday,  April  14,  1945,  all  pub- 
lic offices  m  Missouri  be  closed  and  that  the  Citizens  of  Mis- 
souri pause  in  a  short  period  of  silent  prayer  during  the  time 
at  which  the  funeral  services  are  being  held  at  the  White 
House;  and 

I  further  proclaim,  that  all  flags  flown  from  public  installa- 
tions in  the  State  of  Missouri  shall  be  flown  at  half  mast  for 
a  period  of  thirty  days"  (etc*)* 


APRIL  19v  1945 
From  tJk*  Register  &f  Civil  ProeeddtingBt  1944^47,  p.  1B& 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday  April  22, 1945,  as  Dum- 
barton Oaks  Day  and  suggests  that  the  people  pray  for  the 
succesa  of  the  San  Francisco  Conference* 


600  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

APRIL  20,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  18S 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  calling  for  a 
special  election  to  fill  vacancy  for  State  Representative  caused 
by  the  death  of  Theo.  W.  Hukriede  (Warren  Co.). 


APRIL  21,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  April  22  to  29,  1945, 
World  Fellowship  Week,  urging  all  individuals  to  unite  in 
devout  prayer  for  victory  and  divine  guidance  of  United 
Nations  conferees  and  people  of  world  as  they  seek  to  devise 
ways  and  means  of  attaining  and  maintaining  world  peace. 


APRIL  27,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p*  187 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  to  the  Sheriff 
of  St.  Francois  Co.  for  the  purpose  of  electing  State  Repre- 
sentative to  fill  place  caused  by  the  death  of  Hon.  JL  G.  Gaebe, 
for  Tuesday,  May  15,  1945. 


APRIL  28,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Cfoil  Proceedingst  1944*>1$4T>  p,  1ST 


The  [Governor]  issued  a  proclamation  in  observance  of 
Boys  and  Girls  Week,  April  28  to  May  5,  25th  anniversary. 


MAY  4,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proowdinffs,  1944<*W4?*  f>* 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  declaring  the  week 
May  6  to  13  National  Music  Week- 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  601 

MAY  7,  1045 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  19$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation,  declaring  May  7  to 
12  Cadet  Nurse  Week. 


MAY  8,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Cwil  Proceedings,  1944-194.7,  p.  194 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  that  Germany  has 
unconditionally  surrendered  and  the  war  in  Europe  has  come 
to  a  victorious  conclusion.  He  proclaimed  that  this  event  [is] 
one  of  the  most  momentous  in  our  history  and  asked  that  we 
join  the  Nation  in  Thanksgiving  over  the  victory  of  our 
gallant  Armies,  etc. 


MAY  12,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  CvoU  Proceedings,  1944~1947>  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Sunday, 
May  13,  Mother's  Day. 


MAY  19,  1945 
From  the  RegtiUr  of  Cfefl  Proceeding*, 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday,  May  20,  as  "I  Am  An 
American  Day*** 

MAY  21,  1946 
From  th#  RtgiaUr  of  Civil  Proceeding*^  JPiWW/,  *>.  $03 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  May  22 
as  National  Maritime  Day* 


602  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

MAY  28,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-^1947,  p.  208 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  June,  1945,  as 
Dairy  Month  as  Vital  to  Victory. 


JUNE  6,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the  week 
of  June  10-16  as  "Pledge  of  Allegiance  to  the  Flag  Week/' 


JUNE  14,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedingat  1944*194? »  p> 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday,  June  17,   1945,   as 
'Father's  Day." 

JULY  26,  194& 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p,  &4S 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  July  29,  1945,  as 
Wave  Week. 

JULY  26,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding  1944«£$47t  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  August  as  **Rail- 
road  Manpower  Drive  Month/* 


JULY  80,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proc4$dfaw8,  1$44**1W*  p* 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Wednes- 
day, August  1,  1945,  as  Air  Force  Day. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  60S 

AUGUST  7,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  249 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  October,  1945,  as  National  War  Fund  Month  in 
Missouri. 


AUGUST  14, 1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?',  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  of  Thanksgiving 
relative  to  the  surrender  of  Japan  and  the  end  of  World 
War  IL 


AUGUST  14,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  264 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  declaring  a  two-day 
holiday,  Aug.  15th  and  16th,  in  conformity  with  the  procla- 
mation issued  by  the  President  because  of  the  surrender  of 
the  Japs  and  the  end  of  World  War  II. 


AUGUST  21,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944*1947,  p.  $57 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  revoking  the  request 
of  Gov.  Forrest  C.  Donnell  made  on  May  22,  1942,  and  Sept. 
23,  1942,  limiting  speed  on  highways  and  urging  extreme  cau- 
tion and  observation  of  traffic  rules* 


£,  19*45 

From  t&«  R#gi$t$r  of  CMl  Prooeedwtffs,  1944*1947,  p<  $64 


The  Governor  asked  for  observance  of  Sunday,  Sept.  2, 
as  V-J  Day. 


604  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

SEPTEMBER  6,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Saturday,  Sept.  22,  1945,  as 
American  Indian  Day. 


SEPTEMBER  11,  1946 

From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Monday,  Sept.  17,  1945,  as 
Constitution  Day  in  Missouri. 


SEPTEMBEB  13,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-4947,  p.  &70 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  period  Sunday,  September 
30,  1945,  through  October  7,  1945,  as  Fifteenth  Religious 
Education  Week. 

SEPTEMBEB  13,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-^1947,  P-  £70 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  October,   1945, 
as  Parent-Teacher  Membership  Week. 


SBPTBMBBB  25, 1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944**1W9  P* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  beginning  October  7( 
1945,  "Fire  Prevention  Week/1 


28, 1945 
From  the  Register  of  CMl  Proceeding**  I$44«d94?>  #* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  October  7*13,  faacl» 
1945,  Needlework  Guild  Week. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  605 

OCTOBER  1,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  £80 

The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  Oct.  7,   1945, 
'Optimist  Week/' 

OCTOBER  2,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?,  p.  $$0 


The  Governor  proclaimed  week  Oct.  7-13,  1945,  "National 
Employ  the  Physically  Handicapped  Week." 


OCTOBER  18,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  £89 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Saturday,  October  27th,  1945, 
as  "Navy  Pay/' 

NOVEMBER  7,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding*,  1044-1947,  p.  £99 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Monday,  Nov.  12,  1945,  "Ar- 
mistice Day.** 

NOVEMBER  13,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-4947,  p»  90$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  on  the  Sheriff 
of  Franklin  [County]  to  call  a  special  Election  Tuesday,  Dec. 
4*  1945,  to  fill  a  vacancy  caused  by  the  resignation  of  Joseph 
A,  Falcone  in  the  25th  Senatorial  District, 


NOVEMBER  15,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civtt  Proceedings*  1944*1947,  p.  &<& 

The  Governor  proclaimed  Thursday,  November  22, 1945, 
as  Tha&ksgiving  Day* 


606  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

DECEMBER  20,  1945 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  S24 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Jan.  5,  1946,  as  George  Wash- 
ington Carver  Day. 


FEBRUABY  6,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  P* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  Feb.  17-26,  1946, 
as  American  Brotherhood  Week. 


FEBRUARY  27,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding  a,  1944~J*94?>  P> 


The  Governor  proclaimed  March  2  to  10,  1946,  as  4-H 
Club  Week. 


MARCH  8,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-d847,  #« 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Friday,  March  8,  1946,  aa 
World  Day  of  Prayer. 


MARCH  22,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  CivU  Proceedings,  WU-IW*  p* 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  on  the  Sheriff 
of  Mercer  County  for  a  special  election  to  be  held  Tuesday, 
April  23»  1946,  for  purpose  of  electing  a  State  Representative 
for  Mercer  County. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  607 

MARCH  23,  1946 

A 

From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1964-1947,  p.  386 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election,  to  the  Sheriff 
of  St.  Louis  City  for  a  special  election  to  be  held  April  23, 
1946,  to  elect  a  State  Senator  for  the  old  29th  Senatorial  Dis- 
trict to  fill  the  place  vacated  by  the  death  of  Honorable  Clyde 
W.  Wagner. 


MARCH  26,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  S88 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  calling  upon  the 
people  of  Missouri  to  support  the  State  Program  for  Food 
Conservation. 


APBIX*  i,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  S91 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  April  7  to  13  as 
"Know  Your  Public  Health  Nurse  Week." 


APRIL  8,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Prooeedmgst  1944~1947,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Saturday,  April  6,  1946,  as 
**Army  Day  in  Missouri/* 


APRIL  15,  1946 
From  tito  Register  of  CM  Pfc^eedhigs,  1944~1U7>  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  declaring  the  period 
April  15  to  May  1  as  Cancer  Control  Weeks, 


608  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

APRIL  19,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  404 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  May  as  American 
Legion  Month  in  Missouri. 


APRIL  22,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?,  p.  406 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  April  27  to  May  4 
"Boys  and  Girls  Week.'' 


APRIL  22,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944~194?9  p.  40$ 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  beginning  May  5  as 
"National  Music  Week/' 


MAY  2,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  CivU  Proceedings,  1&44~194?P  p.  413 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday,  May  19th,  as  **I  Am 
An  American  Day." 


MAY  6,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  l$44<*l$4?t  p»  418 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  on  the  Sheriff  of  Perry  County 
calling  for  Special  Election  to  supply  a  vacancy  ctuted  by  the 
death  of  John  X  Andres,  Representative. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  609 

MAY  10,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  417 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  calling  on  all  busi- 
nesses and  every  citizen,  to  cooperate  in  conservation  of  fuel 
and  electricity. 

MAY  10,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  417 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday,  May  12,  as  "Mother's 
Day."  

JUNE  14,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  4$$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation,  setting  aside  Sun- 
day, June  16,  as  "Father's  Day." 


JULY  26,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings^  1944~dQ47,  p.  460 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation,  designating  August 
1,  1946,  as  "Army  Air  Force  Day." 


SEPTEMBER  16,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944»1H79  p.  488 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  October  as  Parent- 
Teacher  Membership  Mouth, 


SEPTEMBER  20,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  CML  Procee&wgs,  1944*1947,  p*  401 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Tues- 
day, Oct.  29, 1946,  as  "Missouri  Day"  at  the  American  Federa- 
tion of  Labor  Union  Label  &  Industrial  Exhibition  at  St.  Louis, 
Mo. 


610  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

SEPTEMBER  23,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  P-  49$ 

The  Governor  issued  the  following  Proclamations: 
Sept.  29  through  Oct.  6  as  "16th  Annual  Religious  Edu. 
Week." 

Month  of  Oct.  as  "U.  S.  0.  See-It-Thru"  Campaign. 
"Fire  Prevention  Week." 


SEPTEMBER  25,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p,  494 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  directing  sheriff 
of  Chariton  Co.  to  call  election  Nov.  5,  1946,  to  elect  State 
Senator. 

SEPTEMBER  30,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  497 


The  Governor  issued  the  following  Proclamations: 
Oct.  6th  to  12th,  1946,  as  Employ  the  Physically  Handi- 
capped Week. 

Oct.  13th  to  19th,  1946,  as  Letter  Writing  Week. 


OCTOBEB  11,   1946 

From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944~1947,  #,  SOS 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Oct.  20- 
26,  "National  Child  Accident  Prevention  Week/" 


OCTOBER  23,  1946 
From  t&«  Reffister  of  Civil  Proceedin&s,  l#44«1947t  &* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sunday,  Get*  27»  at  4lNavy 
Day/f 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  611 

NOVEMBER  6,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding*,  1944-1947,  p.  SIS 


The  Governor  proclaimed  November  10,  1946,  as  "Marine 
Corps  Day." 


NOVEMBER  25,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1344-1947,  p.  526 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  calling  upon  all 
businesses,  industries,  whether  privately  owned  or  publicly 
owned,  and  each  and  every  citizen  of  the  State  to  cooperate 
in  the  conservation  of  fuel  and  electric  current,  etc. 


NOVEMBER  27,  1946 
From  the  Reffi$ter  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1 944-4947,  p.  628 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  First 
Sunday  in  December,  1946,  as  Gold  Star  Remembrance  Day 
in  the  State  of  Missouri  commemorating  the  Nation's  entry 
into  World  War  II. 


DECEMBER  23,  1946 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1$44~1947>  p.  644 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  results  of  General  Election 
held  Nov.  5,  1946, 


JANUARY  81, 1047 
From  tb*  Reffitter  o/  Oiu#  Prooee&foga,  1944*4947,  V* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Wednesday,  February  5*  1947, 
Comervatioa  Pledge  Day. 


612  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

FEBRUARY  6,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19^4"1947t  p.  67$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the  week 
of  Feb.  16-23  as  American  Brotherhood  Week  in  Missouri. 


FBBBUABY  7,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19U-19W,  p. 


The  Governor  called  a  special  election  in  Douglas  County 
to  supply  vacancy  caused  by  resignation  of  Quentin  Haden, 
who  was  member  of  64th  General  Assembly,  said  election  to 
be  held  on  Tues.,  March  4,  1947, 


FBBBTJABY  7,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings*  1944*J947t  p.  87$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  proclaiming  the 
period  from  Feb.  9  through  Feb,  15,  1947,  as  "National  Heart 
Week."  

FEBRUARY  8,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding*,  1944«>2,94?>  p»  $7& 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  proclaiming  Fab- 
1947,  as  Thomas  Edison  Day  in  Missouri- 


FEBRUARY  11,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Cfail  Prow#dinff*t 


The  Governor  issued  a  Writ  of  Election  calling  Special 
Election  to  be  held  Friday,  March  7, 1947,  in  City  of  St  Lomii 
for  State  Senator  of  old  29th  Senatorial  District 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  613 

FEBRUARY  19,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding*,  1944-1947,  p.  888 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Friday, 
Feb.  21,  1947,  as  "World  Day  of  Prayer,"  in  Missouri. 


MARCH  31,  1947 
From  the  Register  af  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-194?,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  April,  1947,  as  Cancer  Control  Month. 


APRIL  4,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944*1 947,  p.  611 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  April  7, 
1947,  as  Army  Day,  and  week  of  April  7  to  12  as  Army  Week. 


APRIL  19,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944*494?,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  designating  April 
20  through  April  26th,  1947,  as  "Public  Health  Nursing  Week," 


19, 1947 
From  the  R*gi*Ur  of  CM  Proaeedinffs,  M44~*W,  P- 


The  Governor  issued  proclamation  designating  week  of 
April  20  through  April  26, 1947,  as  "World  Fellowship  Week/' 


614  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

MAY  10,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Sunday, 
May  11,  1947,  Mother's  Day  in  Missouri. 


MAY  17,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944--1947,  p.  OSS 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
week  of  May  18  to  25th,  inclusive,  as  Naval  Reserve  Week. 


MAY  21,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19  44^9  47 1  #.  68? 

The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Satur- 
day, May  24,  as  "Buddy  Poppy  Day.'* 


MAY  29,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  £9  44*3$  47,  &* 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  June,  1947,  as  "June  Dairy  Month  for  Missouri** 


8,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Prowedfaffs,  X#44*J#4?>  P*  64$ 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  June  5» 
6  and  7»  1947,  as  "35th  Division  (National  Guard)  Days1*  in 
Missouri 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY         615 

JUNE  11,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1944-1947,  p.  646 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Sunday, 
June  15,  1947,  as  Father's  Day. 


JULY  31,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  15 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Aug.  1,  1947,  as  "Army  Air 
Force  Day/' 

SEPTEMBER  11,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947  "19  50  9  p.  38 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  Sept.  14-20  as  Con- 
stitution Week,  and  Sept.  17,  Constitution  Day. 


SEPTEMBER  15,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-J.980,  p.  39 


The  Governor  proclaimed  Sept.  17  as  National  Guard 
Day  in  Missouri* 

SEPTEMBER  16,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947*1960,  p.  40 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  October  as  Parent- 
Teacher  Membership  Month* 


SEPTEMBJCR  24,  1947 
From  Hw  Register  of  Civil  Proceedfaffs,  1947-1980,  p.  44 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
week  of  Sept-  28,  1947,  through  October  5,  1947,  as  17th 
Atmual  Religious  Education  Week* 


616  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

SEPTEMBER  30,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  first  week  in  October,  1947, 
as  Employ  the  Physically  Handicapped  Week,  Oct.  5-11,  1947. 


SEPTEMBER  30,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19J*7-1950t  p,  4,6 

The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  beginning  Oct.  5, 
1947,  as  Fire  Prevention  Week  in  Missouri. 


OCTOBER  9,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  lHT~1950t  p*   $0 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the  week 
of  Oct.  12th  to  19th,  1947,  as  "Letter  Writing  Week." 


OCTOBER  25,  1947 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19b7»195Qt  p.  57 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Oct. 
27,  1947,  as  Navy  Day  in  Missouri. 


NOVEMBER  6,  1&47 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings, 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Nov* 
10,  1947,  as  Marine  Corps  Day  in  Missouri, 


FBBEUABY  11,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947>*U$Qt  p.  108 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  designating  Friday* 
February  13,  1948,  as  "World  Day  of  Prayer1*  in  Missouri 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  617 

FEBRUARY  28,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  117 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  March  1  to  7th 
as  4-H  Club  Week. 


MARCH  30,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  186 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  April,  1948,  as  Cancer  Control  Month. 


APRIL  2,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  1S9 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  designating  April  6, 
1948,  as  Army  Day  in  Missouri. 


APRIL  10,  1048 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  148 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the  week 
of  April  llth  through  April  17th  as  "Public  Health  Nursing 
Week/1 


APRIL  21,  1948 
From  tfc«  RegfaUr  of  CMl  Proowdfogs,  1947*1950,  p.  148 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  declaring  the  period 
begimung  April  15,  1948,  and  through  June  30,  1948,  for  the 
Security  Loaa  Campaign  of  the  Treasury  Department. 


618  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

APRIL  29,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-^1950,  p.  154 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  April 
30,  1948,  as  "Naval  Reserve  Day"  in  Missouri. 


MAY  6,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  1S6 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Sun- 
day, April  9,  1948,  "Mother's  Day  in  Missouri." 


MAY  10,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-19SO,  *>• 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  designating  the  week 
of  May  15-21,  1948,  as  period  of  observance  of  the  30th  Anni- 
versary of  the  United  States  Air  Mail  Service. 


MAY  14,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947*d$£Q>  P* 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  week  of  May  24-29  a& 
V,  P.  W,  "Buddy"  Poppy  Week  in  Missouri. 


MAY  21,  1048 
From  the  Register  of  Cwil  ProGteMng**  1H¥*1$SQ*  p«  104 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  Satur- 
day, May  22,  1948,  as  "National  Maritime  Day*1  in  Mistouri. 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  619 

MAY  28,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  167 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  June  as  "June  Dairy  Month  in  Missouri." 


AUGUST  23,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  19 47-1950,  p.  208 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  pursuant  to  the 
Selective  Service  Act  of  1948,  setting  registration  dates  under 
this  act  for  the  period  August  30  to  September  18,  1948. 


SEPTEMBER  3,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-^1950,  p.  215 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the 
month  of  September  "Youth  Month  In  Missouri." 


SEPTEMBER  14,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  £19 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  relative  to  Missouri 
National  Guard  and  Selective  Service  Act. 


SEPTIDMBEB  22, 1948 
From  th*  Reftfatw  of  GWl  Procee$to0*>  1947~19$4, 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  month  of  October,  1948, 
as  Parent-Teacher  Membership  Month  in  Missouri- 


620  MESSAGES  AND  PROCLAMATIONS  OF 

SEPTEMBER  22,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceeding,  1947-1950,  p. 


The  Governor  proclaimed  the  period  beginning  Sunday, 
Sept.  26,  1948,  and  continuing  through  Sunday,  October  3, 
1948,  as  the  18th  Annual  Religious  Education  Week. 


OCTOBER  1,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  194? -1950,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  urging  the  citizens 
of  Missouri  to  observe  the  week  Oct.  3  through  Oct.  9,  1948, 
as  Fire  Prevention  Week. 


OCTOBER  1,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  229 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  setting  aside  the 
week  of  October  3  through  October  9,  1948,  as  Employ  the 
Physically  Handicapped  Week  in  Missouri. 


OCTOBER  4,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings, 


The  Governor  issued  a  writ  of  election,  to  fill  such  vacancy 
and  do  hereby  issue  [and]  direct  that  you  cause  an  election 
to  be  held  on  Tuesday,  November  2,  1948,  for  the  election  of 
member  of  the  House  of  Rep.  in  Congress  of  U.  S.»  from  Tenth 
Congressional  District  of  Missouri,  to  fill  vacancy  in  Congress 
of  U.  $,»  caused  by  death  of  Hon*  Orville  Zimmerman,  to  fol- 
lowing counties:  Bollinger  Co*;  Butler  Co*;  Mississippi  Co*; 
Cape  Girardeau  Co*;  Dunklia  Co*;  New  Madrid  Co.;  Peml- 
scot  Co.;  Ripley  Co*;  Scott  Co,;  and  Stoddard  Co* 


GOVERNOR  PHIL  M.  DONNELLY  621 

OCTOBER  16,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p.  236 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  urging  that  "United 
Nations  Day"  be  observed  October  24,  1948. 


OCTOBER  18,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  194T-1950,  p.  297 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  designating  the  week 
from  Oct.  17  to  Oct.  23, 1948,  as  National  Letter  Writing  Week. 


OCTOBER  26,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947-1950,  p. 


The  Governor  issued  a  Proclamation  declaring  Wednes- 
day, Oct.  27,  1948,  as  Navy  Day  in  Missouri. 


NOVEMBER  10,  194S 
From  the  Register  of  Civil  Proceedings,  1947~1950>  p.  $47 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation,  proclaiming  Nov. 
10,  1948,  as  ''Marine  Corps  Day  in  Missouri/' 


NOVEMBER  10,  1948 
From  the  Register  of  Cwti,  Proceedings,  1947~1&50>  p«  $48 


The  Governor  issued  a  proclamation  proclaiming  the  week 
beginning  November  14,  1948,  and  ending  November  20, 1948, 
as  ''Plant  Walnut  Week'1  in  Missouri* 


26898