Skip to main content

Full text of "The Methodist quarterly review"

See other formats


REYNOLDS  HISTORICAL1 
GENEALOGY   COLLECTION 


lltA,fM,S9WMT.Y  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  1833  01736  0048 


GENEALOGY 
929.102 
M56MMB 
1869 


METHODIST 


Quarterly  Keview. 

r 


18  6  9. 


VOLUME  LI -FOURTH  SERIES,  VOLUME  XXI. 


D.  D.  WHEDON,  D.D.,  EDITOR. 


OAELfON     &    L  A  N  A  H  A  1ST. 

SAN   FRANCISCO:    E.   THOMAS. 
CINCINNATI:     HITCHCOCK    &    WALDEN. 


7°VZ03 


CONTENTS  OF  VOLUME  LI 


JANUARY  NUMBER. 

Page 
NEW   AMERICAN  HISTOEIES— PECK  AND  DRAPER 5 

J.  T.  C&ane,  D.D.,  Newark,  N.  J. 

INDIA  AS  A  MISSION  FIELD 80 

Rzv.  T.  J.  Scott,  Badaon,  India. 

JOHN  TATTLER  AND  HIS  THEOLOGY 45 

Prof.  Charles  W.  Bekkett,  Berlin,  Prussia. 
THE   METROPOLIS  OF  THE  PACIFIC 63 

E.  Tiioxas.  D.D.,  San  Francisco,  CaL 
THE  NEGRO  IN  ANCIENT  HISTORY 71 

Bev.  Edward  "W.  Bltden,  Professor  in  Liberia  College,  West  Africa. 
GEOLOGICAL  EVIDENCES  OF  THE  ANTIQUITY   OF  MAN '..     94 

J.  S.  Jiwzll,  M.D.,  Professor  of  Anatomy  in  Chicago  Medical  College. 

Foreign  Religious  Intelligence 120 

Foreign  Literary  Intelligence .    125 

srnopsls  of  the  quarterlies 127 

Qcarteklt   Book-Table 135 

Notb  from  Db.  Schaff 163 

Plan  of  Episcopal  Visitation "  154 


APRIL  NUMBER. 

THE   RELIGION  OF  THE  ATHENIANS 165 

B.  F.  Cocker,  D.D.,  Ann  Arbor,  Mich. 
THE  CHURCH  SCHOOL 191 

Ect.  J.  n.  Vincent,  A.M.,  New  York. 
SCHLEIEEMACHER;  HIS  THEOLOGY  AND  INFLUENCE 211 

Prof.  J.  A  Rei-belt,  Indiana  Asbnry  University,  Greencastle,  Lad. 
GROWTH  LN  LANGUAGE 228 

Prot  D.  B.  Wheeler,  Northwestern  University,  Evanstcn,  IU. 
METHODISM:  ITS  METHOD  AND  MISSION 242 

J.  T.  Pick,  D.D.,  Albany,  N.  Y. 

THEODICY 

270 

C  K.  True,  D.D.,  Upper  Newton,  Mass. 

Foreign  Religious  Intelligence 292 

Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies ... 298 

QcAKTEiar  Book-Table :..."...... "801 


4  CONTENTS. 

JULY  NUMBER. 

Pack 

TESTS   OF  A  VALID  MINISTRY  AND   A  TRUE   CHURCH. 825 

E.  S.  Jajtes,  D.D.,  Bishop  of  M.  E.  Church,  New  York. 

LATERALITY  OF  THE  ACCOUNT  OF  THE   GARDEN  OF  EDEN 83S 

Luther  Lee,  D.D.,  Flint,  Mich. 

WHEDON  ON  MATTHEW 346 

A  C.  Geobgf,  D.D.,  St.  Louis,  Ma 

WHITE'S  MASSACRE  OF  ST.  BARTHOLOMEW $65 

Kev.  Hejtry  M.  Bated,  Ph.D.,  University  of  the  City  of  New  York. 

THE  APPLICATION  OF  PHOTOGRAPHY  TO  ASTRONOMY 892 

Prof  Geoege  B.  Mebeimax,  University  of  Michigan,  Ann  Arbor,  Mich. 

THE  PROPHECY  OF  JACOB  RESPECTING  THE  MESSIAH 411 

Hexby  M.  Hakhan,  D.D.,  West  Virginia  University,  Morgantown,  "W.  Ya. 

BIBLICAL  MONOGRAPHS 422 

SAUL  AND  PAUL,  Philip  Schatf,  D.D. 

THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH,  Kev.  M.  J.  Cbamek,  A.M.,  Leipzig,  Germany. 

ST.  PAUL'S  CLOSING  P^EAN,  Editor. 

Foreign  Religious  Intelligence 436 

Foreign  LrrERAEr   Intelligence 441 

Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies 442 

Quarterly  Book-Table .* 44? 


OCTOBER  NUMBER. 

MEMORABILIA  OF  JOHN  GOODWIN 485 

Kev.  D.  A.  Whedox,  D.D.,  Bristol,  K.  I. 

WUTTKE  ON  PRE-PLATONIC  ETHICS 505 

Translated  by  Prof.  J.  P.  Laceoix,  Ohio  Wesleyan  University. 

8AUL'S  INTERVIEW  WITH  THE  WITCH  OF  ENDOR 528 

Kev.  MiLTOX  S.  Terry,  FeekskiU,  N.  Y. 

WHITE'S  MASSACRE  OF  ST.  BARTHOLOMEW.    [Second  Article] 544 

Kev.  He-vkt  M.  Baied,  Ph.  L\,  University  of  the  City  of  New  York. 

RELIGION  AND  THE  REIGN  OF  TERROR 569 

Rev.  J.  A  M'Acley,  A.M.,  Georgetown,  D.  C. 

YOUNG  MEN'S  CHRISTIAN  ASSOCIATIONS '. 5S9 

Kev.  "W.  H.  WrrnROw,  A.M.,  Toronto,  Ontario. 

Foreign  Religious  Intelligence 601 

Foreign  Literary  Intelligence 605 

Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies 605 

Quarterly  Boar-Table 612 


M 


to  twC 

ETHODIST       /J:rr 


Quarterly  Kevie~w. 


JANUAET,    1869. 


Art.  L— NEW  AMERICAN  HISTORIES— PECK  AND 
DRAPER. 

JV  History  of  the  Great  Republic,  Considered  from  a  Chri3tian  Stand-point.  By 
JtssE  T.  Peck,  D.D.    870.,  pp.  710.    New  York:  Broughton  &  Wyman.    1868. 

ThmghU  on  the  Future  Civil  Policy  of  America.  By  John  William  Draper, 
MIX,  LLD.,  Professor  of  Chemistry  and  Physiology  in  the  University  of  New- 
York.-  8vo.,  pp.  317.    New  York:  Harper  ft  Brothers.     1865. 

The  two  volumes  whose  titles  we  have  given  are  in  sharpest 
contrast  with  each  other.  Both  authors  generalize,  and  aim  at 
the  reasons  of  things.  They  both  seek  the  laws  by  which  na- 
tions grow,  and  civilization  advances;  but  here  the  parallel 
*nds.  The  one,  imbued  with  fullest  faith  in  the  spiritual  and 
the  invisible,  studies  the  interior  life  of  the  people,  sees  the 
Mvinc  hand  every-where  laid  upon  human  affairs,  and  regard- 
ing nlUUe  as  secondary  and  incidental,  recognizes  mind  alone, 
UW  unite  and  the  Infinite,  as  the  great  builder  of  nations  and  of 
liMury.  The  other  analyzes  the  soil,  watches  the  barometer  and 
the  thermometer,  notices  the  topography,  and  assumes  that  the 
darkest  problems  in  human  history  are  to  be  solved  by  iso- 
thermal lines  and  the  use  of  the  globes.  His  axioms  are,  that 
all  mundane  events  are  the  results  of  the  operation  of  law,"  and 
all  over  the  world,  physical  circumstances  control  the  human 
nice.  Now  and  then  he  favors  us  with  some  more  specific 
dec  aration  in  regard  to  cause  and  effect,  as  when  he  informs 
u*  that  u  the  instinctive  propensity  to  drunkenness  is  a  function 
Of  the  latitude,"  and  that  Milton's  "Paradise  Lost"  would 
*  ourtii  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 1  i 


6  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

never  have  been  written  had  it  not  been  for  the  Gulf  Stream. 
As  a  rule,  much  learning  is  not  likely  to  make  a  man  mad ; 
nevertheless,  there  are  minds  so  peculiarly  constituted  that  they 
can  hardly  pursue  intently  any  branch  cf  scientific  research  with- 
out falling  victims  to  some  theoretical  crotchet,  which  gives  rea- 
son a  twist  and  renders  it  wholly  unreliable  within  the  circle  of 
the  delusion.  TVe  do  not  question  Professor  Draper's  proficiency 
in  the  natural  sciences,  nor  do  we  fail  to  recognize  the  value,  as 
well  as  the  extent,  of  his  acquisitions ;  but  when  he  proceeds  to 
construct  weak  materialistic  theories  out  of  his  multitudinous 
and  rich  but  abused  facts,  we  confess  that  we  regard  the  raw 
material  as  of  much  more  value  than  the  manufactured  article, 
and  are  reminded  of  the  mouse's  nest  that  was  made  of  bank 
bills. 

It  is  not  wise,  indeed,  to  forget  natural  laws,  or  deny  the 
part  which  they  play  in  shaping  the  destiny  of  men  and  of 
nations.  But  for  the  Nile,  whose  annual  overflow  clothes  with 
fruitful  harvests  a  valley  six  hundred  miles  long,  the  Egypt  of 
history  would  have  been  impossible.  But  the  Nile  still  flows ; 
and  the  annual  tribute  which  the  swelling  floods  bring,  from 
the  southern  mountains  are  as  rich  as  when  hundred-gated 
Thebes  stood  in  her  grandeur.  And  yet  the  greatness  of  Egypt 
is  seen  only  in  the  massive  relics  of  dead  centuries.  The  old 
Eoman,  stern,  patriotic,  law  abiding,  was  not  the  mere  crea- 
ture of  the  zone  which  he  inhabited ;  else  the  modern  Italian 
would  show  more  of  the  iron  strength  of  his  ancestors.  Empires 
wax  and  wane,  not  as  climate  and  soil  change,  but  in  obedience 
to  subtler  influences  and  less  material  laws.  The  materialistic 
fancies  of  certain  pretentious  writers,  the  "  oppositions  of  science 
falsely  so  called,"  are  as  shallow  as  they  are  impious.  Both 
men  and  nations  are  doubtless  shaped  in  some  degree  by  the 
peculiarities  of  their  material  surroundings ;  but  the  most  potent 
of  all  formative  influences  cannot  be  measured  by  the  geometer, 
not  tested  in  the  alembic  of  the  chemist.  The  unseen  is  stronger 
than  the  visible.     As  a  man  "  thinketh  in  his  heart,  so  is  he." 

A  sound  reasoner,  even  if  lacking  in  religious  knowledge,  will 
not  mistake  materialistic  fatalism  for  true  philosophy ;  but  if 
he  believes  in  the  God  of  the  Bible,  he  will  see  the  Divine  hand 
guiding  the  current  of  events,  and  feel  that  the  great  Sovereign 
has  neither  abdicated  nor  been  dethroned.     As  the  power  of 


1869.]         American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  1 

gravitation,  silent,  but  ever  present  and  ever  potent,  guides  the 
descent  of  the  falling  leaf,  holds  the  hills  upon  their  founda- 
tions, and  the  stars  in  their  orbits,  and  yet  allows  the  human 
will  its  area  of  true  freedom  of  action,  so  underneath  all  human 
agencies,  and  through  all  material  forms  and  forces,  and  more 
powerful  than  all,  the  Divine  purpose  rules,  winning  all  things 
into  harmony  with  itself,  and  moving  steadily  onward  to  its 
grand  results.  The  pen  of  the  historian  needs  to  give  this  fact 
a  fuller  recognition.  There  is  a  class  of  mind  which  seems  to 
exult  in  the  rejection  of  every  truth  of  Revelation,  and  yet  is 
weakly  credulous  of  every  thing  besides ;  that  works  with  in- 
sidious zeal  to  make  us  forget  all  except  the  things  which  are 
seen,  and  reject  as  unworthy  of  consideration  every  thing  that 
is  allied  to  what  Atheism  delights  to  call  the  supernatural. 
Yielding  to  none  in  regard  for  scientific  research  and  its  fruits, 
and  holding  as  firmly  as  any  the  existence  of  definite  material 
law,  the  Christian  finds  no  ultimate  basis  but  Divine  wisdom 
and  Divine  agency.  If  the  wildest  Darwinian  theory  of  de- 
velopment could  be  absolutely  demonstrated,  still  the  great 
question  would  remain,  Who  set  in  motion  this  complicated 
enginery  of  cause  and  effect?  True  wisdom  will  trace  with 
profoundest  interest  the  action  of  natural  law,  and  mark  the 
skill  with  which  the  golden  links  are  joined,  each  with  its  fel- 
low, and  yet  feel  at  all  times,  that  however  long  the  chain,  the 
hand  of  God  holds  the  end  which  is  out  of  sight.  Herein  ap- 
pear the  folly  and  the  effrontery  of  a  pretentious  and  yet  feeble, 
unbelieving  philosophy,  which  to-day  traces  the  chain  one  link 
further  back  than  yesterday,  and  straightway  rushes  to  the  con- 
clusion that  nothing  exists  save  material  law  and  its  effects. 
fin  .  ° 

J  he  rustic  who  believes  that  the  world  is  a  vast  plain  which 

rents  upon  a  rock,  and  that  rock  upon  another,  and  "  so  all  the 
way  down,"  is  just  as  wise  and  worthy  of  respect  as  he  who, 
with  sage  face  and  infinitude  of  learned  phrases,  assures  us 
that  there  is  no  God,  but  only  one  cause  growing  out  of  an- 
other, and  so  all  the  way  up.  "Vain  man  would  be  wise, 
though  man  be  born  like  a  wild  ass's  colt." 

This  infidel  abuse  of  science  ought  to  be  rebuked.  We  owe 
it  to  science  and  reason,  as  well  as  to  religion,  to  "witness  a 
good  confession  "  of  a  wiser  faith.  This  Dr.  Peck  has  done,  and 
well  done,  in  his  recent  work.     The  plan  and  purpose  of  the 


8  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

volume  are  clearly  stated  in  the  title-page.  The  author  does 
not  propose  to  write  a  new  history  of  the  Republic,  that  shall 
be  more  accurate  or  complete  in  its  narration  of  events,  or  in 
its  estimate  of  historic  characters,  than  those  which  have  pre- 
ceded it.  As  the  title  of  the  book  declares,  Dr.  Peck's  work 
is  not  so  much  a  new  history  as  a  reconsideration  of  history, 
rehearsing  the  main  facts,  as  briefly  as  is  consistent  with  their 
use  in  illustration,  to  show  the  hand  of  Providence  in  the  found- 
ing and  the  building  of  the  Great  Republic,  and  its  true  place 
in  the  history  of  human  progress.  The  author  thus  states  the 
underlying  principle  upon  which  he  has  built  his  edifice : 

The  theory  of  this  book  is,  that*God  is  the  rightful,  actual  Sov- 
ereign of  all  nations ;  that  a  purpose  to  advance  the  human  race 
beyond  all  its  precedents  in  intelligence,  goodness,  and  power, 
formed  this  great  Republic ;  and  that  religion  is  the  only  lite-force 
and  organizing  power  of  liberty.  Incapable,  as  he  trusts,  of  the 
absurdity  of  any  pretensions  to  originality  in  discovering  either  prin- 
ciples or  methods  of  the  Divine  government,  or  of  having  in  any 
sense  superseded  the  labors  of  other  men,  he  simply  claims  to  have 
made,  with  perfect  candor  and  some  thoroughness,  his  humble 
contribution  to  what  must  be  admitted  to  be  a  very  important,  if 
not  in  some  sense  a  newly-defined,  method  of  American  history. — 
Preface,  page  viii. 

These  antecedent  convictions  are  in  the  highest  degree  con- 
sistent with  both  reason  and  revelation.  If  God  does  not 
superintend  the  affairs  of  men,  then  are  they  adrift  upon  the 
fitful  currents  of  chance,  or,  at  the  best,  at  the  mercy  of  merely 
human  aims  and  agencies,  narrow,  feeble,  and  short  lived.  It  is 
evident  that  God  is  giving  the  American  people  boundless 
material  wealth,  and  every  other  element  of  national  power ; 
and  seeing  that  much  is  required  of  those  to  whom  much  is 
given,  he  must  demand  of  us  a  purer  national  life,  and  a  greater 
advancement  in  personal  virtue,  corresponding  with  our  supe- 
rior advantages.  The  bestowal  cannot  be  aimless ;  the  aim 
must  be  at  least  inclusive  of  this.  And  if  liberty  be  a  good 
thing,  and,  at  the  same  time,  a  perilous  gift  to  men  except 
where  virtue  and  intelligence  prepare  them  to  use  it  wisely, 
then  is  religion  the  only  solid  rock  on  which  to  found  it,  so 
that  it  may  stand  when  the  winds  of  stormy  passion  blow,  and 
the  waves  of  corruption  beat.  We  not  only  agree  heartily 
with  Dr.  Peck's  methods  of  considering  American  history,  but 


1SG9.1  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  9 

believe  that  this  is  the  only  true  method  of  writing  the  history 
of  any  nation ;  and  that  on  any  other  plan  the  work  of  the 
historian,  however  minute  and  accurate  within  its  circle,  fails 
to  go  into  the  real  depths  of  the  theme,  and  above  all,  fails 
totally  to  teach  the  lessons  which  history  ought  to  give,  and 
without  which  it  is  superficial  and  well-nigh  valueless.  The 
moral  and  religious  life  of  a  man  is  his  real  life,  the  chief 
source  of  his  present  joys  and  sorrows,  and  the  arbiter  of  his 
destiny  in  the  life  beyond.  In  regard  to  a  nation,  the  true  in- 
quiry is,  not  what  cities  were  founded,  what  battles  were  fought, 
•what  tyrants  lived  and  died,  but,  "What  were  the  people  ?  What 
did  they  know  of  God,  nature,  and  themselves?  What  value 
did  they  set  upon  truth,  honesty,  honor,  purity,  piety  ?  What 
did  they  most  of  all  seek  for  in  life  ?  What  did  they  most  of  all 
hope  for  in  death  ?  These  things  are  not  fixed  by  the  soil,  the 
climate,  the  natural  scenery,  and  yet  they  afiect  more  than  all 
else,  for  weal  or  woe,  the  national  welfare.  Wouid"  that  the 
history t>f  the  whole  world  were  rewritten,  "considered  from  a 
Christian  stand-point !" 

The  task  which  our  author  proposed  to  himself  was  not  an 
easy  one. 

Assuming  that  there  will  be  no  captious  reader,  anxious  to 
discover  and  reject  all  that  savors  of  the  "supernatural," 
the  work  includes  so  wide  a  field,  involves  interests  of  such 
vast  proportions,  the  nice  weighing  of  so  many  influences,  the 
measuring  of  so  many  forces,  material,  intellectual,  and  moral, 
and  the  interpretation  of  so  many  and  so  diversified  events, 
that  the  labor  of  the  mere  historian  is  light  in  comparison  with 
it.  Our  author  has  done  his  work  thoroughly,  and  with  skill 
and  judgment  In  the  selection  of  representative  events,  and 
the  estimate  of  their  value,  as  well  as  in  his  general  plan 
and  method,  he  has  been  singularly  happy.  The  history  is 
divided  into  five  periods.  The  Period  of  Preparation  extends 
from  the  Discovery  of  America  to  the  time  of  the  agitations 
which  ushered  in  the  war  of  the  Revolution.  The  Period  of 
Independence  includes  the  Revolutionary  War,  and  reaches  on- 
ward to  the  inauguration  of  George  Washington,  the  first 
President  under  the  present  Constitution.  The  Period  of  De- 
velopment extends  to  the  beginning  of  the  Great  Rebellion. 
The  Period  of  Emancipation   treats  of  the   contest  through 


10  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.    [January, 

which  the  nation  has  just  passed  in  the  defense  of  the  national 
life.*  The  Fifth  Period  glances  at  the  Future  of  America,  as 
foreshadowed  in  the  wondrous  past,  and  the  present  hopeful 
state  of  our  country.  The  whole  is  a  body  "  fitly  joined  to- 
gether and  compacted  by  that  which  every  joint  supplieth." 
All  the  sections  find  unity  in  the  chapters,  all  the  chapters  in 
the  periods,  and  all  the  periods  in  the  theme  announced  in 
the  title  of  the  volume ;  so  that  the  discussion  is  not  irregular 
and  fragmentary,  but  exhaustive,  neither  omitting  any  thing 
essential  to  the  argument,  nor  inserting  any  thing  that  does 
not  tend  to  the  conclusion.  The  author  does  not  indeed  trace 
these  periods  with  the  pen  of  the  minute  historian,  attempting 
to  enter  the  field  where  Bancroft,  Hildreth,  and  others  have 
won  their  fame.  Nor  does  he  select,  here  and  there,  the  single 
facts  which  seem  to  favor  his  theory,  while  others  are  designedly 
kept  out  of  sight,  lest  they  undermine  the  logic  of  the  work. 
On  the  contrary  he  comes  before  us,  as  the  spies  returned  to 
Kadesh-barnea,  not  indeed  with  the  vintage  of  every  hill,  nor 
bearing  the  whole  harvest  of' any  field  in  the  land  of  promise, 
but  bringing  enough  to  show  the  character  of  what  has  been 
left  behind.  The  materials  thus  gathered  are  wrought  into  a 
compact  argument ;  and  yet  the  descriptions  are  so  vivid,  the 
narrative  so  clear,  the  whole  so  full  of  vigor  and  enthusiasm, 
with  so  much  of  pathos  and  power,  that  not  only  the  slow  and 
patient  reasoner,  but  even  "  he  that  occupieth  the  room  of  the 
unlearned,"  will  read  on  to  the  end  with  unabated  interest.  In 
fact,  it  is  curious  to  observe  how  Dr.  Peck  now  and  then  loses 
the  author  in  the  preacher,  and  breaks  forth  in  a  fervid  strain 
like  an  exhortation  at  a  camp-meeting.  This  is  no  detriment 
to  the  book.  A  bloodless  historical  essay,  the  hide  of  history 
stripped  off  and  dried,  might  please  a  few  who  have  themselves 
grown  dry  and  shriveled  in  recondite  studies ;  but  "  the  more 
excellent  way"  of  the  enthusiastic  author  has  a  charm  for 
readers  of  every  sort,  and  therefore  a  larger  area  of  influence 
and  usefulness.  The  possessor  of  many  books  will  find  here  no 
tedious  repetitions  of  common-place  knowledge,  and  yet  he 
that  has  no  other  book  upon  the  subject,  but  masters  this,  will 
not  be  ignorant  in  regard  to  the  history  of  his  country. 

The  hand  of  God  appears  at  the  very  beginning  of  American 
history.     Professor  Rain,  a  noted  Danish  antiquarian,  claims 


*** 


1869.]        American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  11 

to  have  discovered  proof,  in  certain  ancient  Icelandic  manu- 
scripts, that  the  old  ^Northmen  visited  this  continent  eight  or 
nine  centuries  ago.  This  may  be  true ;  but  if  so,  it  is  evident 
that  the  visit  effected  nothing,  and  the  world  in  general  knew 
not  that  it  had  been  made.  The  sea  that  lies  westward  of 
Europe  and  Africa  was  believed  by  the  multitude  to  extend  to 
the  edge  of  the  world's  wide  plain.  Unexplored,  unknown, 
mysterious,  it  was  called  Mare  Tenebrosum,  the  Dark  Sea,  and 
regarded  with  superstitious  awe.  A  Spanish  writer  before 
Columbus  declared  that  the  coasts  of  Spain  and  the  East  Indies 
were  not  far  distant  from  each  other ;  and  Aristotle,  long  be- 
fore him,  avowed  the  same  idea.  An  Arabian  scholar,  too,  as 
early  as  the  twelfth  century,  conjectured  that  there  must  be  a 
westward  route  to  China  and  the  East.  These  opinions  were 
entertained  by  at  least  a  few.  Commerce  was  the  great  source 
of  wealth  to  the  "Western  nations,  and  yet  the  boldest  navigators 
of  the  times  dreaded  the  Dark  Sea.  Even  Columbus  might 
not  have  had  courage  for  the  enterprise  which  he  undertook 
had  he  not  been  misled  by  the  erroneous  geography  of  his 
day.  From  Spain  eastward  to  China  is  only  about  one  third 
of  the  circumference  of  the  earth.  Columbus  believed  that 
it  was  three  fourths  of  the  distance,  and  that  the  westward 
route  was  therefore  the  short  as  well  as  the  straight  path  to  the 
East.  Consequently  he  set  forth  upon  his  voyage,  not  seeking 
a  new  continent,  but  a  new  way  to  the  old.  Was  it  by  acci- 
dent that  the  American  continent  lay  so  long  silent  and  un- 
known among  the  shadows  of  the  Dark  Sea  ?  If  the  Northmen 
visited  it  in  the  year  983,  why  was  the  record  of  their  achieve- 
ment never  found  till  it  had  become  useless?  Discovered 
again  in  1492,  why  did  a  whole  century  pass  before  the  people 
who  were  above  all  others  to  shape  the  destiny  of  America,  set 
foot  upon  its  shores?  We  can  only  interpret  the  facts  on  the 
assumption  that  God  has  his  plans,  as  well  as  men,  and  that  his 
time  to  lay  the  foundation  of  the  Great  Republic  had  not  yet 
come. 

'  And  why  not?  The  times  give  the  answer.  The  art  of 
printing  was  yet  a  recent  discovery,  and  its  work  of  instructing 
and  elevating  the  popular  mind  had  hardly  been  begun.  The 
Romish  Church  swayed  the  souls  and  bodies  of  men.  That 
famous  morning  when  the  astonished  people  of  Wittenberg 


12  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     (January, 

read  the  theses  which  Luther  had  nailed  by  night  on  the  church 
door,  was  twenty -five  years  after  that  other  famous  morning 
when  Columbus  and  his  joyous  sailors,  beginning  their  watch 
before  the  dawn,  caught  the  first  sight  of  the  New  World. 
The  age  of  superstition  and  ghostly  despotism  had  not  closed, 
but  the  darkness  began  to  lift,  and  there  was  light  on  the  hori- 
zon. The  day  came  not  suddenly.  Souls  thirsting  for  the 
water  of  life,  and  turning  away  from  the  broken  cistern  to  the 
original  fountain,  felt  the  stern  power  of  Rome.  Imprison- 
ment, torture,  death,  awaited  them.  Centuries  passed  away  in 
bloody .  conflict  before  liberty  of  conscience,  among  even  the 
most  enlightened  nations,  was  seen  to  be  the  most  sacred  of 
human  rights.  During  the  worst  period  of  this  conflict  America 
was  settled.  In  the  interval  between  the  voyage  of  Columbus 
and  that  of  the  Mayflower,  Luther  and  Melanehthon  preached 
and  wrote,  and  the  Reformation  began ;  the  Inqnisition  toiled 
at  its  bloody  work ;  Latimer,  Hooper,  Ridley,  Cranmer,  and 
thousands  of  others,  were  burnt  in  England ;  the  massacre  of 
St.  Bartholomew's  day  occured  in  France ;  the  heroic  Xether- 
landers,  under  the  wise  leadership  of  "William  the  Silent,  suf- 
fered untold  horrors  in  the  cause  of  religious  liberty,  and  finally 
overcame  the  ferocious  enemy ;  and  the  Protestants  of  Bohemia 
began  their  thirty  years'  war  against  Roman  despotism. 

How  curiously  are  human  events,  apparently  the  most  re- 
mote from  each  other,  often  found  welded  together  like  the 
links  of  a  chain.  The  newly  invented  printing-press  roused 
the  slumbering  mind  of  Europe,  brought  active  minds  in  closer 
communion,  disseminated  knowledge,  and  prepared  the  way 
for  progress  in  all  the  departments  of  learning  and  improve- 
ment. "While  the  German  reformers  were  searching  the  word 
of  God,  and  sending  the  truth  abroad  on  the  wings  of  every  wind, 
Columbus,  Yasco  di  Gama,  and  Americus  Yespucius  explored 
the  seas  for  new  lands,  and  new  paths  to  the  old.  So  when  the 
religious  conflict  began,  and  God's  true  worshipers  were  seek- 
ing a  refuge  from  murderous  hands,  the  needed  asylum  opened 
its  bosom  to  all  wjio  were  ready  to  leave  their  native  land  for 
the  sake  of  liberty  of  conscience.  The  love  of  liberty  was  the 
strong  magnet  which  drew  across  the  stormy  ocean  the  English 
Puritan,  the  French  Huguenot,  and  the  Dutch  Remonstrant. 
Had  this  country  been  colonized  at  an  earlier  date,  it  would 


1SG9.1  American  Histories — Peek  and  Draper.  13 

have  been  peopled  by  those  who  were  capable  only  of  planting 
on  these  shores  the  superstitions  and  the  institutions  of  the 
Dark  Ages.  Ilad  the  settlement  been  postponed  till  the  conflict 
was  ended,  no  controlling  religious  motive  would  have  gathered 
the  emigrants  and  driven  them  forth  into  voluntary  exile. 
Surely  the  Divine  Hand  was  in  this ;  not,  indeed,  urging  men 
to  deeds  of  cruelty  and  violence,  but  opening  the  sea  for  the  feet 
of  his  suffering  people,  and  causing  even  the  wrath  of  man  to 
praise  Him,  and  aid  in  the  founding  of  a  nation  destined  to  be, 
above  all  others,  the  powerful  advocate  of  human  rights,  civil 
and  religious ;  whose  mission  it  shall  be  to  spread  the  truth,  and 
war  against  oppression  and  wrong,  world  without  end. 

If  the  hand  of  the  Lord  was  in  these  things,  we  might  expect 
to  bee  a  further  revelation  of  his  plans  in  the  process  of  coloniz- 
ing the  new  territories,  and  especially  in  the  choosing  of  those 
to  whom  he  is  about  to  give  the  goodly  heritage.  It  is  inter- 
esting to  observe  how  the  nations  who  had  been  foremost  in 
the  relentless  persecution  of  God's  people  were  thwarted  in 
their  plans.  The  Pope,  in  solemn  decree,  divided  the  new 
world  between  two  of  his  most  unscrupulous  vassals,  Spain  and 
Portugal,  but  a  power  greater  than  Rome  decreed  otherwise. 
Spain  had  crushed  out  the  truth  by  her  murderous  Inquisition  ; 
and  Portugal  had  been  equally  zealous  to  banish  the  Bible,  and 
those  who  read  it,  from  her  shores.  France,  fresh  from  the 
slaughter  of  the  Huguenots,  sought  to  gain  a  foothold  upon  the 
soil  of  the  future  Republic,  but  its  destinies  were  not  to  be 
given  into  her  gory  hands.  Protestant  Holland  planted  her- 
self at  the  mouth  of  the  Hudson,  and  laid  the  foundations  of 
the  commercial  metropolis  of  the  new  world ;  but  her  narrow 
home  territory  and  scanty  population  uniitted  her  to  occupy 
the  broad  spaces  waiting  to  be  peopled.  And  so  England,  al- 
ready the  land  of  an  open  Bible,  populous,  industrious,  enter- 
prising, brave,  tenacious  of  purpose,  ardent  in  her  love  of 
liberty,  became  the  custodian  of  the  future  home  of  freedom. 
It  is  true  that  the  principles  of  religious  liberty  had  not  yet 
been  fully  recognized  even  in  Protestant  England ;  neverthe- 
less she  was  in  advance  of  other  nations,  and  was  still  advancing. 
In  estimating  the  past  we  are  not  always  just.  Constitutional 
freedom  is  the  slow  growth  of  ages  ;  and  if  we  would  measure 
the  work  done  by  any  given  age,  we  must  compare  it  with  the 


14  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

times  which  preceded  it,  not  with  the  aggregate  results  of  a 
thousand  years  of  conflict  and  Buffering. 

The  author  traces  with  care  the  leading  events  of  the  Period 
of  Preparation,  showing  how  largely  the  idea  of  liberty,  espe- 
cially of  religious  liberty,  inspired  the  hopes  and  entered  tinto 
the  plans  of  the  colonists.  Good  men  are  sometimes  narrow  in 
their  views;  strong  men  are  sometimes  inconsistent.  They 
who  battled  stoutly  for  their  own  rights  were  not  always  ready 
to  concede  the  same  rights  to  others  who  differed  from  them  in 
doctrine  and  modes  of  worship ;  and  the  contest  between  the 
remains  of  the  old  despotic  principle  and  the  new  spirit  of 
freedom  went  on  with  steady  progress  on  the  side  of  the  right. 
Among  the  men  prominent  in  these  strifes  there  is  no  nobler 
name  than  that  of  Roger  Williams,  the  founder  of  Rhode  Island. 
"  He  was,"  as  Bancroft  tells  us,  "  the  first  person  in  modern 
Christendom  to  assert,  in  its  plenitude,  the  doctrine  of  the  liberty 
of  conscience,  the  equality  of  opinions  before  the  law ;  and  in 
its  defense  he  was  the  harbinger  of  Milton,  and  the  precursor 
and  the  superior  of  Jeremy  Taylor."  All  along  the  line  of  the 
colonies,  from  Massachusetts  to  Georgia,  one  of  the  most  pro- 
lific sources  of  internal  agitation  and  dissension,  and  one  of  the 
problems  most  difficult  of  solution,  was  to  determine  how  far 
the  civil  authorities  were  under  obligation  to  interest  themselves 
in  behalf  of  religion,  and  in  what  degree  they  might  seek  to 
shape  the  opinions  of  the  people.  Roger  Williams  advanced 
at  once  to  the  position,  now  an  axiom  in  the  American  mind, 
that  the  Church  and  the  State  should  be  completely  separated, 
and  soul-liberty  be  recognized  as  the  right  of  every  man.  The 
strength  put  forth  in  these  conflicts  was  not  lost/  The  principle 
of  religious  liberty  is  the  germ  of  universal  freedom ;  and  in 
their  long  and  vexatious  strife  for  its  attainment  the  people 
were  trained  to  a  clear  perception,  and  a  sturdy  maintenance, 
of  their  rights,  and  were  thus  prepared  for  the  stern  ordeal 
through  which  they  were  to  pass  in  after  years  in  resisting 
oppression  at  the  hands  of  the  mother  country. 

The  Second  Period  is  that  of  Independence,  and  includes  the 
agitations  which  preceded  the  Revolution.  The  colonies  were 
in  constant  collision  with  their  governors,  the  proprietaries,  or 
the  Crown.  The  chartered  companies  were  eager  to  make 
money  out  of  the  settlements  within  their  several  territories; 


1809.]  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  15 

the  governors  whom  they  sent  over  looked  after  the  interests 
of  the  proprietors  rather  than  those  of  the  colonists ;  the  King 
was  jealous  of  his  prerogatives,  and  determined  to  extend  them 
if  possible ;  the  Parliament  often  legislated  with  sole  reference 
to  the  interests  of  English  manufacturers  and  shipowners. 

The  colonists  meanwhile,  engaged  chiefly  in  agriculture, 
were  scattered  over  a  broad  and  fertile  land,  where  each  tilled 
the  fields  which  his  own  strong  arm  had  won  from  the  primeval 
forest,  and  lived  a  simple,  but  free,  self-reliant,  independent  life, 
feeling  no  instinctive  sense  of  allegiance  to  any  sovereign  save 
Him  who  gives  to  men  seed-time  and  harvest,  sunshine  and  rain. 
In  regard  to  the  ownership  of  the  soil,  the  right  to  manufacture 
and  to  traffic,  the  rights  of  the  ballot,  of  the  press,  and  of 
colonial  legislation,  there  were  strifes  and  controversy,  and 
tin  ally  war,  which  brought  into  full  play  every  manly  attribute, 
and  taxed  every  element  of  power.  The  length  of  the  disputes 
which  terminated  in  war,  and  the  severity  of  the  war  itself, 
were,  in  the  end,  not  disadvantageous.  While  by  stout  remon- 
fttrance,  and  eloquent  appeal,  and  labored  argument,  in  which 
the  great  truths  of  human  equality  and  human  rights  were 
boldly  enunciated,  they  were  contending  against  tyranny,  every 
mind  was  trained  to  recognize  the  value  of  liberty,  and  every 
heart  was  fired  with  hatred  of  oppression  in  all  its  forms.  It  is 
only  when  truth  is  assailed  that  its  real  strength  is  displayed ; 
and  it  is  only  when  freedom  is  in  danger  that  its  true  bounds  are 
shown  and  its  sacred  character  vindicated.  The  Declaration  of 
Independence  is  not  "a  mere  strino-  of  o;litterino-  o-eneralities," 
but  a  clear  and  strong  statement  of  the  conclusions  to  which  the 
people  had  come  in  their  researches  into  the  nature  of  govern- 
ment, and  the  obligations  which  it  involves.  Thus  prolonged 
discussion  taught  the  people  correct  theories  in  regard  to  human 
rights,  and  cultivated  an  intense  patriotism ;  while  the  war  it- 
self invested  freedom  with  the  double  luster  which  comes  of 
heroic  suffering  and  heroic  achievement.  That  the  Divine 
Hand  was  in  the  conflict,  guiding  the  current  of  events,  and 
bringing  out  the  grand  result,  does  not  require  great  faith 
to  believe,  especially  when  we  see  to  what  an  extent  the 
religious  element  was  present  and  active  in  the  life  of  the 
nation.  Let  any  great  truth  be  fixed  in  the  soul  of  a  man  or 
of  a  community,  and  it  becomes  a  factor  in  all  future  reasoning 


16  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

and  action.  The  great  mass  of  the  colonists,  especially  those 
of  the  [Northern  States,  were  thoroughly  imbued  with  the  prin- 
ciples of  religious  liberty.  They  claimed  it  as  their  birthright, 
given  of  God ;  and  to  men  thoroughly  convinced  of  the  exist- 
ence of  this  one  inherent  right  it  was  natural,  perhaps  inevi- 
table, that  they  should  be  restive  under  despotism  of  any  kind. 
Thus  among  the  fathers  of  the  Republic,  the  political  was 
intimately  connected  with  the  religious  life  of  the  people ;  nor 
will  it  ever  cease  to  be  so,  except  where  the  schemes  of  corrupt 
.and  guilty  men  are  at  war  with  common  justice  and  humanity, 
as  well  as  with  the  word  of  God. 

Of  American  freedom,  the  resultant  of  these  varied  forces, 
and  the  reward  of  this  long  struggle,  our  author  thus  expresses 
his  appreciation : 

American  liberty — what  language  can  express  the  glow  of  rap 
ture  with  which  we  contemplate  it !  "We  feel  the  thrill  of  its  life, 
and  the  throb  of  its  joy,  as  it  courses  through  our  veins.  Liberty 
to  think  and  to  utter  our  thoughts ;  liberty  to  write,  and  print,  and 
read,  and  no  fear  of  servile  police,  or  loathsome  cells,  or  murderous 
injustice;  liberty  to  study  and  proclaim  God's  holy  word,  kneel  at 
his  sacred  altar  and  claim  for  ourselves  the  blood  of  atonement,  with 
no  intervening  priest,  and  no  artificial  terrors  from  the  thunders  of 
the  Vatican  :  with  what  gratitude  ought  we  to  recognize  privi- 
leges so  exalted  as  the  gift  of  Providence  alone. — Page  333. 

'.  The  Third  Period  is  that  of  Development,  comprising  the 
seventy-two  years  that  elapsed  between  the  inauguration  of 
"Washington  as  President  of  the  United  States  and  the  break- 
ing out  of  the  rebellion.  One  third  of  the  volume  is  devoted 
to  this  account  of  our  progress  in  population,  liberty,  govern- 
ment, internal  resources,  commerce,  war  power,  learning  and 
the  arts,  manhood  and  humanity,  depravity  and  religion. 

In  the  year  1775  the  population  of  the  colonies  was  esti- 
mated to  be  3,017,678.  At  the  present  time  our  people  must 
number  3S,000,000,  at  the  lowest  estimate.  Of  this  number 
about  6,000,000  are  of  foreign  birth  and  4,500,000  are  colored. 
Among,  the  immigrants  national  peculiarities  are  short  lived. 
The  parents  may  be  English,  Irish,  or  German,  but  their  chil- 
dren are  Americans,  and  none  but  the  closest  observers  are  able 
to  detect  the  lineage.  Nor  do  we  look  upon  this  influx  of  pop- 
ulation from  other  lands  as  endangering  our  institutions.  Other 
causes  may  be  regarded  with  distrust,  but  we  have  no  fear  that 


1SC9.3  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  17 

the  Republic  ^vill  fail  because  the  people,  whether  native  or 
foreign  born,  will  cease  to  love  a  free  representative  Govern- 
ment. Our  adopted  citizens,  as  our  suave  politicians  have 
learned  to  call  them,  have  not  always  used  their  newly  acquired 
privileges  wisely.  As  a  class  their  influence  has  too  often 
tended  to  make  reforms  more  difficult,  and  to  keep  the  legisla- 
tion of  the  country  at  a  lower  moral  level  than  it  would  other- 
wise have  attained.  On  the  great  questions  of  slavery,  the  ob- 
servance of  the  Sabbath,  and  the  restriction  of  the  liquor  traffic — 
the  vital  questions  which  the  present  generation  of  Americans 
must  meet — their  weight,  has  been  on  the  wrong  side  ;  and  yet, 
even  on  these  points,  there  has  always  been  a  minority  for  the 
right,  intelligent,  earnest  and  steadily  growing  in  numbers. 
If  any  of  our  readers  are  apprehensive  that  Home  will  destroy 
the  liberties  of  the  Republic,  we  point  them  to  recent  events 
in  Europe.  As  a  political  power  Romanism  is  steadily  declin- 
ing. When  Austria  has  broken  the  chains  that  bound  her, 
and  Spain  is  marching  on  to  freedom,  religious  as  well  as  civil, 
lhe«  would  seem  to  be  little  probability  that  America  will 
bow  down  to  receive  the  yoke  which  they  have  found  intolera- 
ble. With  the  right  settlement  of  the  great  political  questions 
which  now  agitate  us,  we  anticipate  an  improvement  in  all  de- 
partments of  our  national  life.  Only  by  justice  and  order  can 
liberty  be  preserved.  Intelligence  and  religion  must  guide  the 
people,  or  patriotism  will  never  rise  to  the  level  of  a  true  virtue, 
and  the  whole  national  structure  will  lack  solid  strength.  These 
latent  principles  are  doing  their  work.  We  believe  that  we 
are  building  on  the  rock.  Our  progress  seems  slow;  we  trust 
thai  it  is  sure.  It  took  almost  a  century  to  settle  the  question 
whether  a  man  whose  religious  belief  commands  the  suffrages 
of  a  minority 'only  ought  to  possess  all  the  rights  of  citizenship, 
and  still  another  century  to  determine  whether  freedom  belongs 
to  all  men,  irrespective  of  race  and  color.  These  questions  the 
piety  and  intelligence  of  our  people  have  settled,  we  trust,  for 
all  time.  Whatever  may  be  the  state  of  parties  in  civil  affairs, 
whatever  the  relative  strength  of  our  various  ecclesiastical  or- 
ganizations, none  need  fear  that  the  conclusions  to  which  we 
have  come  will  ever  be  disputed  by  Americans. 

With  the  growth  of  the  population  there  has  been  a  corre- 
sponding development  of  material  resources.     In  the  decade 


18  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     LJanuary, 

ending  in  1S60  the  farms  of  the  nation  doubled  in  aggregate 
value,  and  yet  at  that  date  only  one  fifth  of  the  entire  area  had 
been  inclosed,  and  only  one  third  of  the  inclosed  lands  were 
cultivated  ;  in  other  words,  only  one  acre  of  every  fifteen 
throughout  the  national  domain  has  yet  been  turned  with  the 
plow.  The  industry  of  the  people  in  other  directions  has  been 
crowned  with  success,  increasing  with  equal  ratio.  Manufac- 
tures, gold,  silver,  iron,  coal,  petroleum,  are  sources  of  wealth 
whose  streams  constantly  deepen  and  widen.  In  climate,  in 
soil,  in  river  systems,  in  breadth  of  area,  in  advantages  of 
location,  in  wealth — agricultural,  mineral,  and  of  the  forest — 
in  industry,  enterprise,  and  ability  to  wTill  and  to  do,  no  nation 
ever  had  so  goodly  a  heritage,  or  was  better  prepared  to  enjoy 
it.  Commerce,  too,  binds  us  to  other  lands,  and  produces  its 
abundant  fruits  for  us  and  them.  On  the  sea  as  well  as  on  the 
land,  and  in  ships  of  the  navy  as  well  as  the  mercantile  ma- 
rine, the  skill,  enterprise,  and  courage  of  the  Americans  are 
conspicuous,  and  the  sea,  as  well  as  the  land,  pays  tribute  to 
our  greatness. 

The  military  strength  of  the  nation  has  been  developed  in  an 
equal  degree.  In  colonial  times  conflicts  with  the  savages  kept 
alive  the  courage  of  the  people,  and  trained  them  to  the  use  of 
arms.  This  stern  experience  prepared  them  for  the  lono-  and 
weary  struggle  for  independence,  and  cultivated  the  soldierlv 
qualities  which  achieve  success.  Since  that  time  we  have 
fought  the  Barbary  States  for  the  free  navigation  of  the  Medi- 
terranean ;  we  have  fought  England  for  the  free  navigation  of 
the  ocean  ;  we  have  fought  Mexico  for  territory ;  and  last 
and  fiercest,  sternest  strife  of  all,  fought  the  southern  rebels 
for  the  national  unity  and  the  national  existence,  and  succeeded 
in  every  case.  A  celebrated  British  statesman  declares  that 
from  the  last  contest  we  come  forth  "the  most  formidable  war 
power  of  the  world."  May  the  justice  and  humanity  of  the 
American  people  be  equally  developed,  that  this  colossal 
strength  may  never  be  exerted  among  the  nations  save  in  the 
cause  of  peace,  humanity,  liberty,  and  the  rights  of  man  ! 

Learning  and  the  arts  are  not  neglected  among  us.  The  idea 
of  common  schools,  which  shall  provide  at  least  an  elementarv 
education  for  all  our  children,  belongs  originally  to  New 
England,  but  is  becoming  national.     In   the  southern  States 


1S69.J  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  19 

the  principle  of  universal  education  has  not  yet  been  incorpo- 
rated in  the  local  law  every-where.  The  Romish  Church  every- 
where seeks  to  fence  in  her  people  from  others,  'and  keep 
every  thing  in  the  hands  of  the  clergy.  Still,  the  principle  of 
nniversal  education  in  the  public  schools  is  essentially  Ameri- 
can, and  must  prevail.  In  the  cities  and  larger  towns  the  free 
schools  are  constantly  enlarging  in  area  of  study,  and  improv- 
ing in  their  general  management.  In  addition  to  their  religious 
teaching  the  Sunday-school  gives  incidental  secular  instruction 
to  those  otherwise  destitute  of  educational  privileges;  and  the 
pure  morals  of  the  Gospel  are  inculcated  every-where  in  con- 
nection with  the  great  truths  of  Eevelation.  "In  1786  Bishop 
Afibnrr,  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church,  established  the 
fir<t  Sunday-school  proper  on  the  Western  Continent.'' — Repub- 
lic, page  445.  "We  have  at  this  time  probably  five  millions  of 
children  in  the  Sunday-schools  of  the  various  Churches,  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  schools  alone  containing  a  million  and  a 
half. 

The  next  grade  of  our  educational  institutions  above  the 
common  schools  is  what  is  commonly  called  the  academy  or 
Mamillary.  Of  these,  hundreds  have  been  established  throughout 
the  land  ;  some  by  individual  liberality  and  enterprise,  others  by 
local  municipal  authorities,  and  many  by  the  various  Church  or- 
ganizations. They  contain  tens  of  thousands  of  students,  who 
receive  an  education  which  includes  facilities  for  the  study  of 
natural  and  mental  science,  the  higher  mathematics,  and  an- 
cient and  modern  languages.  Our  colleges  are  numerous,  and 
are  eteadily  rising  in  character  and  in  completeness  of  equip- 
ment for  their  work. 

The  periodical  press  comes  forward  to  aid  in  the  dissemina- 
tion of  knowledge,  and  to  prepare  the  American  people  to  be- 
come intelligent  citizens.  In  1860  there  were  4,051  periodicals 
of  various  kinds  published  in  the  United  States. 

It  is  of  little  avail  to  attempt  to  estimate  the  value  of  the  press 
in  this  Republic.  It  has  its  vicious  elements;  is  seized  by  infidels, 
Romanists,  spiritists,  and  demagogues,  to  mislead  the  people  for 
selfish  ends,  or  to  promote  a  perverted  class  interest.  But  this  ex- 
ceptional use  of  the  great  power  of  the  nineteenth  century  does  by 
no  means  render  its  freedom  questionable,  or  its  influence,  as  a 
whole,  pernicious.  Its  teachings,  good  and  bad,  illustrate  the  free- 
dom of  true  republicanism;  while  its  collisions  of  mind  and   prin 


20  American  Histories— Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

ciple  reveal  the  safety  of  free  discussion,  and  bring  out  with  en- 
hanced power  all  the  great  doctrines  of  liberty.  Licentiousness  in 
the  press,  as  well  in  as  every  thing  else,  must,  of  course,  be  sup- 
pressed ;  but  the  Americans  are  sensitive  in  regard  to  any  other 
limitations.  The  purest  and  noblest  in  our  nation  say,  "Let  the 
battle  go  on  ;  let  error  and  fiction  war  with  truth  ;  let  the  selfish 
passions  of  leaders  and  parties  dash  against  the  fortress  of  liberty ; 
let  infidelity  and  superstition  assault  the  pure  principles  of  the 
Gospel  and  the  true  Church  of  God  ;  there  is  no  danger." 

Nor  are  the  fine  arts  neglected  among  ns.  In  painting. 
Allston,  West,  Jams,  Inman,  and  Peale,  of  an  earlier  day,  and 
more  lately  Elliott,  Fraser,  Trumbull,  Stuart,  Durand,  Church, 
and  others,  show  that  crossing  the  ocean  has  not  quenched  the 
fires  of  genius,  and  that  in  a  republic,  and  not  in  the  shadow 
of  a  throne  only,  it  finds  appreciation  and  reward.  In  sculp- 
ture, Greenough,  Powers,  Palmer,  and  others,  have  attained  a 
success  which  honors  them,  and  prepares  the  way  for  still 
greater  efforts. 

While  our  civilization  shows  the  impress  of  true  religion,  the 
millennium  has  not  yet  come.  "We  have  among  ns  a  danger- 
ous class  increasing  with  the  growth  of  population.  Intem- 
perance, which  is  the  shame  and  the  curse  of  civilized  states, 
is  eating  into  our  national  life  like  an  ulcer.  Neither  religion, 
nor  patriotism,  nor  humanity,  nor  all  three  combined,  can 
devise  weapons  potent  enough  to  cope  with  this  hideous  enemy. 
For  a  whole  century  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  has 
borne  unwavering  testimony  against  it.  Sixty  years  ago  the 
Old  Temperance  Society  began  its  career.  Thirty  years  since 
the  Total  Abstinence  pledge  was  adopted  as  the  basis  of 
reform.  Since  then  the  Sons  of  Temperance,  and  other  kin- 
dred organizations,  have  been  toiling  in  the  field,  and  have 
clone  nobly.  And  still  these  agencies  are  only  like  so  many  arks 
floating  above  a  drowning  world.  The  flood  of  death  is  not 
abated,  nor  even  abating.  For  a  period  which  stretches  into 
the  future  beyond  the  limits  of  human  vision,  alcohol  seems 
destined  to  be  the  banc  of  the  so-called  Christian  nations, 
wasting  their  substance,  fostering  every  vice  and  crime  known 
to  fallen  humanity,  filling  earth  with  tears  and  blood,  and 
peopling  hell  with  the  damned.  Socialism,  Mormomsm,  and 
that  compound  of  imposture  and  folly  which  we  call  spiritism, 
show  that  our  people  are  not  so  enlightened  but  that  victims 


I  SCO  J  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  21 

may  be  found  to  the  grossest  superstitions;  nor  so  moral  as  to 
prevent  their  sinking  into  the  worst  forms  of  vice.  Of  Mor- 
monism,  however,  we  ought  to  say,  in  justice  to  ourselves,  that 
its  apostles  have  been  far  more  successful  in  other  countries 
than  at  home.  Nevertheless,  it  is  humiliating  to  know  that 
the  institutions  of  the  heathen  find  even  temporary  legal  sanc- 
tion in  any  recognized  territory  of  the  United  States.  Roman- 
ism, too,  is  growing  rapidly  by  immigration  ;  and  recent  Popish 
allocutions,  as  well  as  utterances  nearer  home,  assure  us  that  it 
lias  lost  none  of  its  arrogance.  Home  still  claims  that  it  has  a 
right  to  use  the  secular  arm  to  coerce  men  to  submit  to  its 
demands,  and  a  priest  resident  in  ISTew  Jersey  has  had  the  har- 
dihood to  publish  a  pamphlet  defending  the  principle.  This 
latter  publication,  however,  we  construe  as  a  significant  proof 
that  while  Eomanism  is  spreading  more  widely  on  the  surface, 
it  is  losing  its  power  over  the  minds  of  men.  It  is  contrary 
to  Popish  strategy  to  avow  such  views,  and  designs,  and  thus 
throw  down  a  challenge,  not  only  to  Protestantism,  but  to  mod- 
ern civilization  itself.  We  suspect  that  the  rank  and  file  of 
tho  Catholic  community  are  becoming  insubordinate,  and 
therefore  it  is  necessary  to  threaten  them  with  dungeons  and 
tortures.  Moreover,  it  is  the  fixed  policy  of  the  priesthood  to 
keep  alive  bitter  feelings  between  their  people  and  the  Protest- 
ants, that  the  ignorant  Romanist  may  regard  every  Protestant 
**  his  enemy,  and  shut  his  ears  against  him. 

In  the  political  world,  also,  wide  spread  depravity  and  cor- 
ruption are  developed.  Money  is  freely  used  for  electioneering 
purposes,  including  the  direct  purchase  of  votes,  and  thus  the 
very  fountain  of  our  legislation  is  poisoned.  It  is  hardly 
reasonable:  to  suppose  that  they  who  have  secured  office  by 
britary  will  themselves  be  found  beyond  the  reach  of  bribes  in 
discharging  their  official  duties.  The  political  press  is  venal  and 
unscrupulous,  and  too  often  the  deceiver,  instead  of  the  instruct- 
or, of  the  citizen.  Only  the  coolest  and  most  intelligent  of  the 
people  really  arrive  at  an  understanding  of  the  matters  at 
issue  in  our  political  contests;  and  even  they  are  sometimes 
at  a  loss  for  the  means  of  judging,  because  every  alleged  fact 
and  mooted  question  is  so  deeply  buried  in  an  avalanche  of  op- 
posing lies,  that  certainly  no  ordinary  eye  can  reach  the  depth. 
On  this  general  subject  our  author  discourses  thus: 

Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXL— 2 


22  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

The  freedom  granted  to  the  citizen  by  the  government  of  the  people 
may  be  greatly  abused.  Demagogues  may  use  it  for  selfish  ends ; 
party  spirit  may  rise  above  national  claims ;  bad  men  may  aspire 
to  office  and  succeed ;  bribery  and  misrepresentation  may  deter- 
mine at  elections,  pass  laws,  and  corrupt  the  seat  of  justice.  All 
this  has  occurred  here,  and  it  is  no  relief  to  us  to  show  that  it  is 
so  every-where  ;  that  bribery  and  corruption  in  elections  are  re- 
duced to  a  system  in  England,  and  so  utterly  shameless  as  to  allow 
of  no  attempt  to  deny  them,  or  obviate  their  damaging  power.  If 
it  be  true  in  theory  that  all  this  is  easier  and  more  likely  to  occur 
in  a  republic  than  under  a  constitutional  monarchy,  it  is  not  true 
in  fact.  These  are  vices  which  do  not  inhere  in  systems  of  gov- 
ernment. They  are  back  of  all  governments.  They  arise  from  a 
common  depravity,  indicate  a  common  danger,  and  require  a  com- 
mon remedy.  The  race  is  coming  to  feel  the  imperative  demand 
for  a  divine  regeneration  of  society,  the  grand  model  of  which  is 
found  in  every  true  Christian  in  "whose  heart,  purposes,  motives, 
and  acts  old  things  have  passed  away,  and  all  things  become  new. 
Until  this  grand  consummation  is  reached  in  the  common  human- 
ity of  our  nation  we  must  battle  with  political  dishonesty.— 
Page  510. 

But  there  has  been  a  development  of  genuine  piety  as  well 
as  of  depravity.  The  chapter  devoted  to  this  part  of  the  dis- 
cussion consists  of  a  series  of  papers  prepared  by  clergymen  of 
the  various  leading  denominations,  showing  the  part  which 
each  has  had  in  the  building  up  of  the  nation.  It  is  claimed 
in  behalf  of  the  Cougregational  Churches  of  ISTew  England, 
that  at  the  very  foundation  of  the  American  State  they  culti- 
vated the  most  ardent  love  of  civil  liberty.  The  Presbyterian 
Churches  have  been  foremost  in  the  establishment  of  institu- 
tions of  learning,  and  in  inculcating  reverence  for  the  Sabbath, 
and  the  whole  moral  code  of  the  Scripture.  The  entire 
course  and  spirit  of  the  Baptist  Church  have  been  in  full 
sympathy  with  American  institutions,  and  the  battle  for  lib- 
erty of  conscience  was  fought  by  them  both  in  New  England 
and  Virginia.  The  Methodist  Churches,  by  their  doctrines, 
their  evangelical  spirit,  and  their  methods  of  labor,  more  than 
any  other,  reached  the  people,  keeping  pace  with  the  advancing 
lines  of  settlement  and  the  spread  of  population,  and  thus  fur- 
nishing evangelical  agencies  suited  to  the  wants  of  a  new  and 
growing  country.  The  Protestant  Episcopal  Church  trained 
the  people  to  recognize  authority  and  value  law  and  order. 
Other  miuor  bodies  have  been  busy,  each  doing  in  its  own  way 
its  part  of  the  great  work. 


1869.]         American  Histories — Peek  and  Draper.  23 

Nor  has  the  complete  separation  of  Church  and  State 
which  characterizes  us  worked  in  any  degree  to  the  detriment 
of  religion.  Every  department  of  Christian  activity  is  culti- 
vated among  us  with  a  liberality  in  the  use  of  money,  a  zeal 
and  a  success  not  below  the  rest  of  the  Christian  world.  In 
England  the  churches  of  all  kinds  are  capable  of  accommo- 
dating with  seats  at  one  and  the  same  time  fifty-seven  percent, 
of  the  entire  population.  In  the  United  States  sixty  per  cent, 
can  be  thus  accommodated.  Fifty-four  thousand  churches 
have  been  erected,  and  their  Pastors  are  supported  without  a 
dime  from  tithes  or  State  treasury.  At  this  very  time  no  other 
nation  on  the  face  of  the  globe  is  so  multiplying  its  houses  of 
worship  as  are  the  Americans.  And  notwithstanding  the 
inflow  of  foreign  immigrants,  the  membership  of  the  evangel- 
ical Churches  has  more  than  kept  pace  with  the  population. 
Leaving  children  under  ten  years  of  age  out  of  the  calculation, 
there  were,  in  the  year  1800,  about  nine  Church  members  in 
every  hundred  of  the  people;  in  1832  there  were  fourteen  ; 
in  18G0  there  were  twenty-four.  We  are  persuaded  that  our 
poor  are  at  Feast  as  well  cared  for  as  in  any  other  land.  Ee- 
funnatory  institutions  of  various  kinds,  asylums  for  the  deaf 
and  dumb,  for  the  blind  and  the  insane,  for  idiots  and  ine- 
briates, have  sprung  tip  every-where  among  us,  and  have  gath- 
ered about  them  the  appliances  needed  to  render  them  efficient 
in  their  good  work.  The  American  Bible  Society,  the  Sea- 
men's Friend  Society,  the  Young  Men's  Christian  Associations, 
iho  various  Sunday-School  Unions,  Tract  and  Missionary 
boctetiee,  with  other  kindred  agencies,  show  that  the  American 
Churches  are  progressive  in  their  spirit,  generous  in  their 
benefaction*,  active  in  their  labors,  and  courageous  to  assault 
the  strongholds  of  sin  and  error. 

The  author's  Fourth  Period  is  that  of  Emancipation.  Sla- 
very was  planted  on  the  American  shores  at  a  very  early  day. 
The  Spaniards  began  the  nefarious  work  by  enslaving  the 
hapless  natives  of  the  West  Indies,  who  were  exterminated  by 
the  cruel  bondage  to  which  they  were  reduced.  African'sla- 
very  was  introduced  into  Cuba  on  the  plea  of  humanity,  it 
being  urged  as  the  only  mode  of  preserving  the  remnant  of  a 
race  which  was  fast  disappearing.  In  1620  it  made  its  way 
from  the  islands  to  the  continent.     A  Dutch  vessel  brought 


24  Albican  Histories— Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

twenty  negroes  to  Jamestown,  in  Virginia,  and  sold  them  to 
the  planters.  Thus  began  a  traffic  which  transferred,  as  it  is 
estimated,  four  hundred  thousand  Africans  from  their  native 
laud  to  the  New  World.  And  slavery  is  a  gigantic  crime  that 
contains  within  it  all  forms  of  wrong.  The  "  patriarchal " 
idea  of  it  as  a  diviue  institution,  involving  lofty  responsibili- 
ties on  the  side  of  the  master,  and  a  wholesome  subordination 
on  the  part  of  the  slave,  and  blessing  both,  may  be  made  to 
show  well  on  paper,  but  it  has  never  been  successfully  embod- 
ied in  actual  life.  Slaves  may  despair  of  deliverance ;  thev 
may  sink  down  helpless,  hopeless,  crushed ;  but  they  are  never 
content,  nor  is  the  master  ever  at  ease.  Slavery  can  be  kept 
in  existence  only  by  the  steady  application  of  a  stern,  relent- 
less force,  which  neither  fears  God  nor  regards  man.  In  our 
own  land  it  has  wrought  its  due  results.  It  first  corrupted  the 
North  by  the  gains  of  the  slave-trade,  and  then  debased  and 
brutalized  the  South  by  the  inevitable  effect  of  the  institution 
itself.  The  nation  has  never  been  at  rest  in  regard  to  the  evil. 
The  great  statesmen  of  the  earlier  day,  Washington,  Jefferson, 
and  their  compeers,  were  unanimous  in  condemning  the  insti- 
tution; sometimes  hopeful  that  it  would  gradually  disappear 
without  conflict  or  disaster,  sometimes  fearful  that  some  great 
calamity  would  grow  out  of  it. 

But  the  invention  of  various  machines  made  the  cultivation 
of  cotton  exceedingly  profitable,  and  slaves  rose  in  value.  The 
financial  interests  of  the  South  became  involved  with  slaverv 
and  it  became  a  great  power  in  the  land.  Under  its  shadow 
there  grew  up  a  school  of  politicians,  self-seeking,  unscrupu- 
lous, and  adroit,  who  subordinated  all  national  obligations 
and  interests  to  those  of  their  own  section,  and  cared  less  for 
the  interests  of  their  section  than  for  their  own  personal 
exaltation.  These  crafty  plotters  rallied  their  people  for  the 
support  of  slavery,  and  thus  made  the  South  a  political  unit. 
They  went  into  the  national  conventions  called  by  the  great 
parties,  and  by  compactness,  audacity,  and  skill  controlled 
wherever  they  went.  Their  cunning  projects  were  for  a  lon» 
time  so  successful  that  they  began  to  consider  themselves  om- 
nipotent Northern  politicians  bowed  down  to  them  with  an 
abject  and  eager  obsequiousness  which  was  scarce  exceeded  by 
the  poor  negro  wincing  under  the  lash,  and  which  created,  and 


1609.]  American  Histories— Peck  and  Draper.  25 

\vc  must  confess  in  some  degree  justified,  the  contempt  which 
the  South  professed  to  feel  for  the  North.  The  South,  as  time 
passed  on,  became  still  more  exacting  and  imperious.  First 
demanding,  in  1820,  the  repeal  of  the  resolution  passed  in 
179S,  limiting  slavery  to  the  territory  then  occupied  by  it,  it 
obtained  what  was  called  the  Missouri  Compromise,  by  which 
the  institution  was  permitted  to  overspread  the  new  Territories 
of  the  United  States  as  far  north  as  36°  30'.  It  next  demanded 
the  repeal  of  the  Compromise  of  1820,  on  the  plea  that  it  was 
unconstitutional,  neither  Congress  nor  the  territorial  legisla- 
tures having  any  legal  right  to  exclude  it.  Northern  meanness 
and  sycophancy  yielded,  southern  arrogance  triumphed,  and 
from  that  moment  war,  though  then  below  the  horizon,  was 
inevitable.  The  northern  politicians,  who  had  sold  justice, 
honor,  and  humanity  for  office,  could  not  drag  their  constitu- 
ents down  into  the  depths  of  the  infamy  into  which  they  had 
themselves  plunged.  A  new  political  party  arose,  not  to  assail 
southern  institutions  on  their  own  soil,  but  to  resist  the  aggres- 
sions of  slavery.  The  strife  which  began  on  the  plains  of 
Kansas  became  finally  the  greatest,  bloodiest  struggle  of  mod- 
ern times.  The  contest,  which  first  employed  argument  and 
then  tiie  ballot,  was  fought  at  last  with  steel.  War  flamed 
■Jong  a  hundred  battle  fields.  Year  after  year  of  fearful 
daughter  followed  and  left  the  contest  still  undecided.  Mean- 
while the  nation  was  passing  through  a  moral  regeneration — 
coming  out  of  darkness  to  the  light.  By  a  comparatively  slow, 
mm|  yet  steady  process,  the  intelligence  and  moral  power  of  the 

<*tli  fathered  in  solid  strength,  not  merely  on  the  side  of  law 
•M  the  Union,  but  of  universal  freedom.  President  Lincoln's 
proclamation  of  "  liberty  throughout  all  the  land,  to  all  the  in- 
habitants thereof,"  was  doubtless  demanded  as  a  war  measure; 
but  it  was  no  less  demanded  by  the  moral  sense  of  the  North 
«.«  a  measure  without  which  the  logic  of  loyalty  was  incomplete, 
and  its  great  purpose  lacked  its  crowning  glory.  God  gave  vic- 
tory to  the  right ;  and  from  the  chaos  of  bloody  war  the  natfon 
emerged  regenerated,  disenthralled,  freed  from  the  infinite 
crime  and  the  crashing  incubus.  The  victory  of  the  North- 
was  the  triumph  of  intelligence,  patriotism,  humanity,  and  reli- 
gion, over  treason,  ambition,  barbarism,  and  wrung. 

The  volume  closes  with  a  glance  into  the  future  history  of 


26  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

America,  as  foreshadowed  in  the  past  and  the  present.  This 
constitutes  the  author's  Fifth  Period.  It  need  not  be  said  that 
he  is  hopeful,  and  even  sanguine.  If  this  nation  is  true  to  lib- 
erty, humanity,  and  to  God,  it  has  before  it  a  grander  history 
than  ever  shone  in  the  records  of  the  past.  No  other  people 
combines  the  elements  of  strength  now  given  into  American 
hands.  England  is  rich  and  brave,  and  loves  law  and  order 
and  liberty.  France  possesses  intelligence  and  enterprise.  Italy 
possesses  sunny  skies  and  a  fertile  soil.  Prussia  has  the  true 
Protestant  love  of  schools  and  learning.  Eussia  has  broad 
realms  and  a  vast  population.  But  America  has  all  these — 
intelligence,  enterprise,  courage,  liberty,  numbers,  wealth,  a 
genial  climate,  and  a  broad  and  fertile  domain,  where  her  teem- 
ing millions  find  an  ample  home,  and  where,  we  trust,  in  the 
coming  ages  the  lofty  destiny  of  a  truly  Christian  people 
awaits  her. 

The  dying  rebellion  bequeathed  us  a  burden  and  a  problem 
— all  it  had  to  give.  It  is  not  an  easy  thing  so  to  manage  the 
national  debt  as  to  deal  justly  and  honorably  with  the  national 
creditors,  and  yet  impose  no  oppressive  taxation.  It  is  not  easy 
to  say  what  measures  will  soonest  heal  the  wounds  of  war,  and 
restore  the  southern  States  to  the  Union  in  spirit  and  in  truth, 
and  at  the  same  time  secure  effectually  the  civil  rights  of  south- 
ern loyal  men  of  both  races.  Still  the  burden  is  not  intolerable, 
nor  is  the  problem  incapable  of  solution.  The  debt  can  not 
only  be  borne,  but  paid  to  the  uttermost  dollar.  The  interest 
amounts  to  about  one  cent  a  day  to  each  of  our  people  ;  and  a 
burden  of  that  size  is  not  intolerable,  especially  when  our 
shoulders  are  made  strong  by  the  conviction  that  it  is  the  price 
of  national  existence.  A  single  fact  ought  to  relieve  the  appre- 
hensions of  the  faint-hearted,  if  we  have  faint  hearts  among  us; 
though  the  enormous  expenses  of  actual  war  have  scarcely 
ceased,  we  have  already  paid  not  only  the  interest  falling  due, 
but  one  tenth  of  the  principal  of  the  debt.  Another  fact  will 
give  increasing  courage  and  confidence.  The  Preliminary 
Report  of  the  Eighth  Census  shows,  that  at  the  close  of  the 
ten  years  preceding  the  war  the  real  and  personal  property  of 
the  nation  was  increasing  at  the  rate  of  one  thousand  millions 
of  dollars  annually.  Surely  a  people  of  such  resources  will  be 
able  to  manage  an  indebtedness  of  twentv-fivc  hundred  millions. 


1660.1         American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  27 

We  do  not  doubt  that  the  increase  of  the  value  of  real  estate 
biuce  the  war  is  more  than  equal  to  the  entire  debt  of  the 
United  States. 

The  problem  of  reconstruction  is  not  yet  settled,  but  we 
trust  soon  will  be.  The  leaders  of  the  two  great  parties  are 
Antagonistic  in  their  plans  and  platforms,  because  both  their 
views  and  their  interests  are  in  conflict.  On  the  principle  of 
impartial  suffrage,  the  political  power  in  the  reconstructed 
States  will  remain,  at  least  for  a  time,  in  the  hands  of  the 
Republicans.  If  the  colored  citizen  South  is  disfranchised,  the 
men  who  led  the  rebellion  will  control  their  respective  States. 
The  Democratic  leaders  have  little  hope  of  getting  control  of 
the  General  Government  without  the  help  of  the  States 
recently  in  rebellion.  The  plan  of  the  Kepublicans  is,  there- 
fore, to  reorganize  the  late  rebel  States  as  speedily  as  possible, 
the  leading  rebels  beiug  disfranchised,  and  the  freedmen  ele- 
vated to  the  rank  of  voters.  The  policy  of  the  Democrats  is  to 
prevent  acquiescence  in  this  mode  of  adjustment,  and  secretly 
encouraging  all  possible  resistance  and  confusion  in  the  South- 
ern States,  to  point  to  the  anarchy  thus  created  as  proof  that 
the  Republican  .plan  of  reconstruction  is  unwise  and  impracti- 
cable. It  is  trne  that  no  genuine  patriot  and  statesman  will 
seek  to  manage  so  vital  a  national  question  on  so  sordid  a 
principle  as  the  one  indicated ;  but  unfortunately  there  are  in 
the  ranks  of  both  the  parties  politicians  who  are  neither 
patriots  nor  statesmen.  Still,  a  solid  principle  underlies  the 
whole  question.  "We  believe  that  it  is  wrong,  dangerous,  and  in 
every  way  unwise  to  declare  by  law  that  five  millions  of  the 
American  people,  natives  of  the  soil,  shall  have  no  voice  in 
the  government,  bear  no  responsibility  in  regard  to  it,  but 
remain  forever  foreigners,  aliens,  pariahs,  a  degraded  class, 
deprived  of  the  incitements  to  honorable  effort  which  others 
feel,  and  branded  as  lower  in  the  scale  of  humanity  than  other 
men.  We  do  not  demand  universal  suffrage  in  behalf  of  the 
colored  man,  but  so  far  as  race  is  concerned  let  suffrage  be 
impartial  Establish  a  definite  standard  of  moral  and  intellect- 
ual qualification,  if  you  will,  and  place  it  as  hi"h  as  you  will, 
but  give  the  negro  an  equal  chance  with  the  rest.  lie  asks 
n<»  more.  True  statesmanship,  to  say  nothing  of  humanity 
and  religion,  will  bestow  no  less. 


28  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.     [January, 

But  we  are  persuaded  that  tins  question  will  in  time  be 
settled,  as  other  difficult  questions  have  been  settled  before  it. 
Not  many  years  ago  the  Jews  were  disfranchised,  and  despised 
and  persecuted  in  almost  every  country  of  Europe.  Two  hun- 
dred years  ago,  in  New  England,  if  a  man's  religious  opinions 
were  not  esteemed  orthodox,  his  right  to  vote  was  denied  as 
6toutly  as  is  the  Georgia  negro's  to-day.  The  progress  already 
made  is  a  pledge  of  an  increasing  measure  of  justice  and  hu- 
manity in  the  laws  of  civilized  States  in  the  years  to  come,  and 
we  believe  that  the  period  is  not  far  distant  when  color  will 
not  deprive  any  man  of  the  reward  to  which  his  intelligence, 
his  moral  worth,  or  his  labor  of  any  kind,  may  justly  entitle 
him.  When  the  question  of  "  negro  equality  "  becomes  useless 
as  a  party  instrument  both  to  opposers  and  advocates,  it  will 
cease  to  be  agitated  by  politicians ;  and  when  legal  barriers 
are  removed  from  his  path,  the  law  will  have  done  for  the 
black  man  all  that  it  can  do,  and  he,  like  others,  must  be  con- 
tent with  what  he  fairly  earns  by  work  or  worth. 

We  have  faith  in  the  future  of  this  nation.  We  believe  in 
freedom,  in  equal  rights,  in  liberty  of  conscience,  in  the  vol- 
untary system  of  sustaining  religious  institutions.  Xo  mode 
of  government  does  its  work  perfectly.  Under  any  form — 
monarchical,  aristocratic,  or  republican — justice  will  be  incom- 
plete, and  property  and  person  in  a  degree  unsafe  :  there  will 
be  thieves  in  the  public  treasury,  and  corrupt  men  in  high 
places;  there  will  be  vice,  and  pauperism,  and  crime,  and  suf- 
fering, and  agitation,  and  a  thousand  proofs  that  the  race  is 
fallen.  Under  no  form  of  government  will  virtue  and  vice, 
industry  and  idleness,  truth  and  falsehood,  goodness  and  wick- 
edness, find  at  once  their  exact  reward,  and  every  man,  good 
and  bad,  go  to  his  own  place.  Still  we  believe  in  the  Ameri- 
can idea,  and  in  the  success  of  the  institutions  based  upon  it. 
As  the  divine  principle  in  dealing  with  man  is  to  place  his 
welfare  in  his  own  hands,  and  hold  him  responsible,  visiting 
him  with  good  or  evil  as  his  own  conduct  determines  :  so  dem- 
ocratic institutions  lay  upon  the  people  the  responsibility  of 
securing  their  own  welfare,  and  shaping  their  own  destiny, 
promising  them  only  that  degree  of  freedom,  safety,  and  pros- 
perity which  their  intelligence,  virtue,  and  piety  deserve.  Be- 
cause we  believe  in  God,  and  liberty,  and  religion,  and   not 


18C9.1         'American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  29 

that  we  trust  in  mere  human  wisdom  and  strength,  and  schemes 
and  theories  of  men,  we  share  the  high  hopes  of  our  author, 
with  the  glowing  expression  of  which  he  closes  his  volume  : 

Our  example  must  shine  in  uninterrupted  light.  Our  litera- 
ture— volume  and  periodical — will  pass  into  other  languages,  and 
it  will  be  the  calm  expression  of  liberty.  Our  representative  cit- 
izenship will  assume  the  dignity,  and  command  the  consideration, 
throughout  the  world,  due  to  great  organic,  living  truth.  Our 
missionaries  of  religion,  with  the  most  scrupulous  obedience  to  all 
governments  in  which  they  are  found,  will  be  perpetual  represent- 
atives of  progress  in  the  true  American  spirit.  Our  foreigu  min- 
isters and  consuls,  with  influence  ever  increasing,  will  be  the  calm, 
dear,  manly  expositors  of  the  doctrine  of  liberty  for  princes,  courts, 
and  people.  Our  ships  abroad  will  be  laden  with  the  word  of  God, 
and  messages  of  salvation  to  the  perishing.  "  Liberty  to  the  cap- 
tives" will  move  over  the  world  by  our  grand  steam  navies,  and 
flash  through  the  air  by  our  telegraphs;  and  the  power  of  our 
growing  prosperity,  under  the  genius  of  Christianity,  will  be  the 
silent,  pervading  influence  which  will  blend  harmoniously  with  all 
freedom  every-where  as  the  grandest  missionary  of  progress  ever 
known  among  men. 

Dr.  Peck  has  made  to  American  literature  a  contribution 
of  great  and  permanent  value.  The  general  plan  of  the  work 
is  good,  and  the  execution  in  all  respects  admirable.  The 
author  is  broad  in  his  views,  accurate  in  the  statement,  and 
wise  in  the  interpretation  of  facts,  candid  and  generous  in  his 
spirit,  clear  and  eloquent  in  his  style,  and  above  all,  has  full 
faith  in  God  and  the  right.  Leaving  the  beaten  path,  he 
goes  below  the  surface,  and  digs  for  the  treasures  hidden  in 
the  field.  He  points  out  the  moral  springs  of  human  action, 
and  confesses  a  Divine  government  in  human  affairs,  and 
thus  writes  in  full  view  of  principles,  without  a  recognition 
of  which  the  story  of  war  and  heroes,  and  the  rise  and  fall 
of  empires,  is  but  the  chaff  and  not  the  grain  of  history. 
For  this  very  reason  the  work  will  not  be  popular  with 
men  of  a  low  moral  grade.  Its  reasonings  will  be  to  the 
materialist  a  stumbling-block,  and  to  the  demagogue  fool- 
ishness ;  but  to  the  intelligent  Christian  patriot  it  is  a  book 
to  be  loved,  and  read  again  and  again.  It  ought  especially 
to  be  studied  by  every  young  American. 

It  may  be  added  that  the  publishers  have  given  the  vol- 
ume an  outward  seeming  worthy  of  its  contents;  and    that 


30  American  Histories — Peck  and  Draper.  ■  [January, 

the  valuable  portraits  of  distinguished  men,  the  paper,  the 
type,  and  the  whole  mechanical  execution,  set  it  before  the 
reader  as  "  apples  of  gold  in  pictures  of  silver."  We  are 
glad  to  know  that,  as  a  literary  venture,  it  is  abundantly 
successful,  and  remunerative  to  all  concerned. 


Art.  IL— INDIA  AS  A  MISSION  FIELD. 

There  are  many  questions  profoundly  interesting  connected 
with  the  past,  present,  and  future  of  India  /  but  we  desire 
simply  to  present  its  merits  as  a  mission  field.  Has  this  mag- 
nificent country,  grand  in  its  wonderful  history,  stretching  far 
back  into  the  hoary  past,  and  no  less  grand  in  its  resources, 
capabilities,  and  the  new  life  that  after  a  slumber  of  ages  begins 
to  thrill  its  countless  population,  special  present  claims  on  the 
attention  and  evangelistic  enterprise  of  the  Christian  Church  ? 
On  the  one  hand  is  Christendom,  as  the  conquest  of  Christ, 
wrested  from  the  power  of  darkness,  ready  to  push  the  conflict  ? 
on  the  other,  is  the  heathen  and  non-Christian  world  now 
assailable  at  any  point  the  Church  may  select  ?  The  forces 
numerically  considered  stand  thus :  professional  Christendom, 
three  hundred  and  thirty-five  millions ;  the  nominal  Christian 
world,  nine  hundred  and  fifty-three  millions.  The  field  to  be 
conquered  is  yet  great  in  extent,  and  the  enemy  to  be  engaged 
of  vast  number.  Is  India  a  specially  hopeful  point  of  attack 
for  any  Christian  denomination  wishing  to  make  the  most  of 
its  resources  in  this  conquest  of  the  world  ?  And,  India  gained, 
what  is  the  probable  result  on  future  efibrts  for  the  complete 
evangelization  of  the  race  ? 

In  reply  to  this  query,  let  us  look  at  the  claims  of  this  field 
in  this  point  of  view.  In  the  pursuit  of  truth,  or  in  the  van- 
quishment  of  error  and  the  spread  of  light,  whether  in  physics 
or  metaphysics,  the  establishment  of  civil  liberty  and  the  rights 
of  man  or  the  progress  of  true  religion  in  the  earth,  there  are 
certain  vital  points  which,  mastered,  aid  inightily  in  the  eradi- 
cation of  error,  and  contribute  greatly  to  future  success.  A 
thoughtful  survey  of  the  whole  subject  leads  to  the  conclu- 
sion that  India,  as  a  mission  field,  is  one  of  these  vital  points 
in  the  evangelization  of  the  world  ;  and  Churches  which  are 


1SC9.1  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  31 

lending  forth  missionaries,  and  are  expending  large  sums  of 
money  in  the  maintenance  of  missionary  operations  in  this  field, 
ihould  be  greatly  reassured  in  their  efforts  by  this  survey. 

The  past  is  full  of  grand  and  important  lessons  for  the  gen- 
eration now  on  the  stage  of  the  world's  busy  theater.  "  God 
in  History."  has  rightly  become  one  of  the  studies  of  the  age. 
Allusions  to  the  wonderful  providence  of  God  in  locating  his 
covenant  people,  the  prospective  religious  instructors  of  the 
race,  on  the  eastern  shore  of  the  Mediterranean,  have  become 
commonplace.  The  Sunday-school  scholar  has  been  made  to 
admire  the  divine  wisdom  of  Him  who  "  declareth  the  end 
from  the  beginning,"  in  placing  the  chosen  race  in  the  eastern 
end  of  that  vast  basin  around  which  the  world's  activities- were 
BO  largely  to  stir,  so  that,  secluded  as  it  was  during  the  period  of 
its  growth  and  early  tuition,  it  eventually  became  the  highway 
of  the  surging  nations  as  they  rolled  back  and  forth,  diffusing 
leavening  light  and  truth  far  and  wide  in  the  surrounding  dark- 
ness. And  when  the  Gospel  dispensation,  the  world's  perfect 
and  complete  great  lesson  in  religion,  was  ushered  in,  do  we 
not  see  the  Divine  Wisdom  still  manifest  in  the  direction  taken 
by  the  Gospel?  Why  did  it  not  go  eastward  instead  of  west- 
ward ?  The  nations  spreading  away  to  the  Pacific  in  the  East 
were  no  more  hostile  to  it  than  the  proud,  idolatrous  Romans, 
and  the  peoples  swallowed  up  in  their  vast  empire ;  while  they 
had  not  the  combination  and  political  engineering  to  crush  out 
the  new  faith  that  so  boldly,  in  apparent  helplessness,  struck 
ft  deadly,  an  uncompromising  issue  with  ancient  idolatry  and 
pride,  of  worldly  wisdom.  In  the  Macedonian  cry,  "  Come 
over  and  help  us,"  and  the  prohibition  of  the  Holy  Ghost  from 
preaching  the  word  in  Asia,  we  have  more  than  a  faint  hint 
ol  God's  providence  touching  the  direction  in  which  the  Gospel 
was  spread.  It  was  He  who  knows  all  the  future,  and  whose 
sleepless  care  and  divine  wisdom  never  fail  in  the  work  of  re- 
demption which  he  has  undertaken  for  our  lapsed  race,  that 
directed  the  movement  of  Christianity  to  the  westward.  He 
knew  the  capabilities  of  nations,  and  foresaw  their  future 
development;  and  was  present  with  the  Apostles  and  brethren 
in  the  councils  of  Jerusalem  and  Antioch.  Westward  around 
the  great  basin  of  the  Mediterranean  rolled  the  Gospel  wave, 
through  Egypt  and  Carthage— through  Asia  Minor,  Greece,  and 


32  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

Italy.  The  ocean  of  Pagan  Europe  was  to  break  in  devasta- 
tion over  Rome,  and  a  new  social  and  political  continent  wa3 
"in  time  to  emerge,  retaining  in  its  landscape  all  that,  was 
really  valuable  in  the  old.  with  new  virtues  and  new  capabili- 
ties, and  by  and  by  rule  the  world  as  it  is  doing  to-day.  It  is 
no  disparagement  of  Christianity  in  its  blessed  work  of  pro- 
moting man's  highest  good  morally,  socially,  and  politically, 
to  say  that  Europe  does  not  owe  all  its  social  and  intellectual 
development  to  the  Gospel  alone.  Doubtless  it  would  be 
difficult  in  the  extreme  to  estimate  the  great  benefit  that 
Europe  has  reaped  from  the  presence  of  Christianity.  At  the 
same  time,  it  has  had  circumstances  of  climate  and  country, 
and  the  conflict  and  blending  of  peoples,  that  have  rendered  it 
capable  of  a  progress  for  which  other  parts  of  the  globe  have 
not  been  prepared.  Divine  Providence  guided  Christianity 
where  it  could  co-operate  with  these  capabilities.  Its  asso- 
ciations and  affinities,  in  a  human  point  of  view,  so  to  speak, 
would  have  turned  it  rather  toward  the  East ;  but  there  was  a 
Divinity  that,  by  visions  of  the  night,  and  impulses  of  the  Holy 
Ghost,  shaped  its  end. 

This  lesson  is  of  easy  application.  It  is  the  highest  wisdom 
in  the  Church,  in  working  her  evangelizing  organizations,  to 
trust  prayerfully  and  implicitly  to  the  guidance  of  the  Holy 
Ghost  in  selecting  points  for  missionary  operations.  With  this 
reliance  on  the  promised  direction  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  there 
should  be  a  careful  and  thoughtful  study  of  God's  providence 
among  the  nations  and  peoples  now  being  thrown  open  to  the 
Gospel.  These  two,  the  Divine  Spirit  and  the  well-read 
"  signs  of  the  times,"  will  surely  lead  the  hosts  of  the  Lord  to 
the  best  points  of  attack  in  reclaiming  the  world  to  him.  India 
.  is  now  receiving  a  larger  share  of  missionary  effort  than  any 
other  part  of  the  Christian  world.  This,  doubtless,  is  the 
result  of  more  than  earthly  wisdom.  All  missionaries  and 
missionary  societies  experience  periods  of  depression  on  account 
of  the  apparent  6mallness  of  visible  results,  and  the  difficulty 
of  keeping  up  supplies.  If  there  is  any  element  of  success — 
any  moral  power  in  being  reassured,  a  survey  like  the  present 
is  far  from  being  useless.  It  will  lead  us  to  thank  the  Lord 
and  take  courage.  We  are  pressing  on  in  the  surest  path  to  a 
glorious  victory. 


IS .;-.).]  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  33 

Xature  marked  out  India  for  a  great  country.  Geograph- 
ically considered  it  is  completely  a  unit,  consisting  of  a  broad 
tongue  of  land  projecting  into  the  Indian  Ocean,  and  walled 
off  from  the  rest  of  Asia  by  the  vast  Himalayan  chain,  and 
flanked  on  the  east  and  west  by  immense  river  systems,  the 
approach  to  which  is  defended  again  by  lofty,  rugged  mount- 
ains. Thus  fitted  by  nature  as  the  common  home  of  a  great 
nation,  India  has,  from  a  period  of  great  antiquity,  been 
occupied  by  a  remarkable  people,  who  entered  it  at  a  very  early 
date  in  the  world's  history.  A  tropical  or  mild  climate  through 
oil  its  latitudes  renders  the  question  of  clothing  less  difficult  than 
in  colder  countries,  while  a  soil  of  great  fertility  yields  with 
moderate  labor  an  abundance' to  clothe  and  sustain  a  popula- 
tion difficult  to  be  borne  by  many  portions  of  the  globe.  These 
doses  have  made  India  from  a  very  early  period  the  seat  of 
an  intelligent  and  prosperous  people,  and  the  coveted  prize  of 
ambitious  conquerors,  and  destine  it  to  occupy  an  important 
leading  position  in  renovated  Asia.  This  point  should  not  be 
overlooked  in  an  economical  productive  expenditure  of  mis- 
tionary  resources. 

The  availability,  so  to  speak,  of  a  race  or  people  is  a  proper 
consideration  in  the  planting  of  missions.  ~W"hat  is  the  appar- 
ent capability  or  promise  of  the  people  for  whom  it  is  proposed 
to  e.-^tablish  a  mission,  becomes  an  important  question.  In  the 
lapse  of  ages,  through  diverse  conditions  and  circumstances,  a 
marked  difference  has  developed  among  the  races  and  peoples 
of  the  earth.  Decided  diversities  are  appareut  in  their  intel- 
livtual,  social,  political,  and  moral  capabilities.  Eaces  and 
peoples  have  a  hereditary  character,  just  as  individual  men. 
riso  peri>etuated  and  accumulated  impress  of  surroundings  has 
grown  into  marked  and  distinguishing  traits  and  peculiarities. 
Hence  the  capabilities  and  hopefulness,  even  in  a  missionary 
]>oint  of  view,  of  different  peoples  greatly  vary.  A  striking 
illustration  of  this  point  is  found  in  the  American  Indians, 
whose  wild  and  reluctaut  nature  renders  them  unapt  pupils  in 
the  school  of  Christianity  and  civilization.  Large  tracts  of 
Africa  are  peopled  by  degraded  savage  tribes,  so  dwarfed, 
physically  and  mentally,  and  perhaps  morally,  that  it  is  a 
question  with  learned  and  thoughtful  Christian  men  whether, 
as  tribes,  they  can  be  reclaimed. 


84  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

Viewed  from  this  stand-point  of  thought,  India,  in  regard  to 
its  inhabitants  also,  is  a  land  of  promise.  Here  we  find  a 
teeming  population  of  one  hundred  and  eighty  millions,  nearly 
one  seventh  of  the  entire  human  race,  crowded  into  this  broad 
arable  peninsula,  and  distinctly  shut  off  by  mountain  and  sea 
from  the  rest  of  the  world,  and  as  one  great  people  associated 
in  a  grand  common  theater  of  action.  The  population  of  India 
consists  of  the  remains  of  aboriginal  tribes,  of  Hindoos,  who  are 
settlers  of  a  later  date,  and  of  Mahommedans,  who  are  either 
the  descendants  of  the  original  Moslem  invaders  or  converts 
from  Hindooism.  The  aboriginal  tribes  seem  to  be  of  Scythian 
origin,  and  some  of  them  bear  relationship  to  the  Lapps  and 
Finns  of  Northern  Europe.  They  are  generally  docile,  and  are 
proving  hopeful  to  missionary  effort.  About  one  tenth  of  the 
population  of  India  is  Mohammedan,  and  much  of  this  relative- 
ly small  portion  is  but  little  removed  from  Hindooism.  Thus 
Hindoos  form  the  large  body  of  the  population.  The  infusion 
of  Saracenic  blood  doubtless  has  tended  to  give  energy  and  en- 
thusiasm to  the  too  apathetic  Hindoo.  AVe  speak  more  at 
length  of  the  Hindoo  population,  because  it  is  the  predomi- 
nant, the  really  national  population  of  the  country.  As  before 
remarked,  a  large  part  of  what  is  counted  as  Mohammedan 
population  is  substantially  Hindoo. 

The  race  that  now  really  rules  the  world  and  bids  fair  to 
gain  much  greater  supremacy  is  the  European  or  Caucasian. 
To  this  race  the  Hindoos  belong.  Aryan  is  another  name 
for  this  great  family,  the  original  seat  of  which  was  Central 
Asia,  from  which,  at  a  period  of  high  antiquity,  two  lead- 
in  «•  streams  of  emigration  flowed  out :  one  to  the  "West, 
which  seems  to  have  divided,  one  branch  flowing  through 
Southern,  the  other  through  Northern  Europe :  the  other 
great  Aryan  stream  flowing  southward,  has  given  to  India  its 
Hindoo  population.  There  is  reason  to  believe  that  before  the 
time  of  David  and  Solomon  the  Hindoos  had  firmly  established 
themselves  in  Northern  India,  and  were  an  energetic,  intel- 
lectual people.  The  great  branch  that  had  flowed  westward 
met,  in  after  ages,  with  the  mighty  leaven  of  Christianity  ;  and 
after  more  than  thirty  centuries  these  great  streams  of  the 
ancient  Aryan  race  have  mingled,  by  a  singular  and  perhaps 
significant  providence,  on  the  plains  of  Hindostan,  the  one 


1SC0.]  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  35 

bringing  the  precious  life-giving  lessons  of  the  Sacred  Scripture 
to  supplant  the  subtle  and  profound  philosophy  and  wisdom  of 
the  other,  by  which  it  has  so  long  failed  to  know  God. 

But  this  historical  allusion  has  grown  almost  to  a  digression. 
We  wish  particularly  here  to  call  attention  to  the  mental,  relig- 
ious, and  social  substratum  that  underlies  the  character  of  the 
present  Hindoo  race,  indicative  of  its  capability  and  hopeful- 
ness in  an  evangelistic  point  of  view.  Simultaneously  with 
their  settlement  in  India  the  Hindoos  seem  to  have  begun 
to  develop  into  a  wonderfully  intellectual  people.  Probably 
they  brought  some  of  their  earliest  religious  writings  *with 
them,  as  the  hymns  of  the  Rig  Veda.  But  it  seems  cer- 
tain that,  after  their  invasion  of  Northwestern  India,  the 
Hindoo  philosophers  began  their  labored  and  profound  spec- 
ulations. When  their  brethren  who  had  pushed  far  to  the 
west  were  wandering,  warlike  savages,  in  the  forests  of  ancient 
Europe,  they  were  dealing  in  really  masterly  speculations, 
and  were  discoursing  profoundly  on  philosophical  and  the- 
ological questions  that  only  a  highly-cultivated  mind  could 
suggest ;  some  of  which,  with  no  greater  success,  have  engaged 
the  attention  of  enlightened  Europe  in  recent  times.  Their 
speculations  on  the  origin  and  history  of  the  universe  of  matter, 
the  mode  of  the  Divine  existence,  the  origin  aud  destiny  of  the 
human  spirit,  reveal  the  subtle  and  profound  intellectualism 
of  the  Hindoo  people  in  that  early  age.  In  illustration  of  this 
statement,  we  have  the  singular  fact  that  the  genesis  of  the  mate- 
rial universe,  as  presented  in  the  modern  nebular  hypothesis, 
in  nearly  all  its  transitions  is  substantially  the  same  as  that 
thought  out  and  expounded  by  Hindoo  thinkers  centuries  be- 
fore Greece  had  a  philosopher.  It  should  not  be  very  nattering  ' 
to  the  refined  pantheists  and  idealists  of  the  enlightened  West, 
to  know  that  they  are  but  treading  with  feeble  steps  where 
oriental  giants  walked  perhaps  thirty  centuries  ago.  The 
limits  of  this  article  do  not  allow  an  elucidation  of  the  fact  that 
India  has  been  one  of  the  early  centers  of  the  world's  intellect. 
These  early  grapplings  of  mind  with  profound  questions  of 
nature  and  existence  grew  in  time  into  a  voluminous  litera- 
ture, which,  unlocked  by  the  study  of  Sanscrit,  has  in  more 
recent  times  become  the  wonder  of  Europe. 

Now  this  early  intellectual  superiority  of  the  Hindoo  race 


36  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

undoubtedly  remains  as  a  substratum  among  the  Hindoos  of 
modern  India.  Circumstances  in  more  recent  ages  have  not 
been  so  favorable  for  its  manifestation ;  but  intercourse  with 
the  people,  especially  as  an  educator,  discovers  clearly  that 
modern  Hindoos  are  the  lineal  descendants  of  those  ancient 
sages.  One  is  surprised  at  the  precocity  of  boys  whose  oppor- 
tunities have  been  limited.  India  is  capable  of  yet  becoming 
the  intellectual  teacher  of  Asia. 

There  is  a  remarkable  religious  substratum  underlying  the 
character  of  this  people.  Most  of  the  ancient  systems  of  phil- 
osophy revolved  chiefly  about  the  material  universe,  or  man 
himself.  Anaximander,  a  representative  of  the  Ionic  school, 
set  aside  the  notion  of  God  as  useless  in  an  explanation  of  the 
universe.  Confucius  said  that  filial  piety  is  the  root  of  all  the 
virtues.  But  one  is  struck  with  the  exhaustive  speculations 
and  teachings  of  Hindoo  philosophy  touching  the  Divine  Being. 
As  the  beginning  of  all  things  he  is  the  eternal  Brahm — the 
infinite  pure  unity  ;  and  again  all  things  are  resolved  into  God, 
so  that  he  is  literally  "  all  and  in  all."  To  ignore  the  idea  of 
self  completely,  and  become  wrapped  and  lost  in  the  contem- 
plation of  Deity,  is  the  highest  piety.  This  abnormal  religious 
tendency  has  made  India  far  more  populous  of  gods  than 
Athens  of  old,  and  has  sent  forth  to  lives  of  extremest  asceticism 
tens  of  thousands  who  profess  to  think  hourly  and  momenta- 
rily of  God  alone.  It  has  laden  the  Hindoos  with  a  multifarious 
burden  of  religious  rites  and  ceremonies,  which  neither  they 
nor  their  fathers  have  ever  been  able  to  bear.  Had  the  Apostle 
passed  through  the  cities  of  Hindostan,  more  than  once  he 
would  have  had  occasion  to  remark :  "  I  perceive  that  in  all 
thing8  ye  are  too  superstitious'''' — (deioidai^ovearegovg — wor- 
shipers of  gods.)  With  the  Greek,  patriotism  was  the  ruling 
motive;  with  the  Boinan,  law  ;  but  with  the  Hindoo,  it  was 
religion.  This  theocentric  tendency  of  the  Hindoo  mind  is 
still  present  as  a  substratum,  and  perhaps,  when  thoroughly 
reached  by  the  Divine  light  and  leaven  of  the  Gospel,  India 
may  present  to  the  world  its  brightest  example  of  a  "  people 
whose  God  is  the  Lord."  The  thoughtful  missionary  finds  one 
of  the  most  hopeful  sources  of  encouragement  for  the  future 
of  this  land  here. 

There  is  a  social  substratum  anions:  the  condition  of  the 


IS09J  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  37 

Hindoos  which,  baneful  as  it  has  been,  as  developed  in  the  very 
ancient  caste  system  of  the  country,  nevertheless  has  in  it  ele- 
ments of  future  prosperity.  Where  there  is  no  uniting  mech- 
anism in  society,  no  unification  and  subordination,  there  can  be 
no  large  and  powerful  growth  of  a  common  people.  There 
need  not  be  homogeneousness  of  all  parts  of  society,  but  there 
must  be  union,  subordination.  Wandering  predatory  tribes, 
with  every  advantage  of  climate  and  material  resource,  never 
grow  in  civilization  and  develop  into  a  State.  The  law  and  so- 
cial order  of  Borne,  infused  into  the  lawless  semi-civilized  hordes 
of  Europe,  laid  the  foundation  of  its  present  greatness.  The 
spirit  and  legislation  of  the  Koran  united  the  independent  ma- 
rauding tribes  of  Arabia,  and  they  grew  into  a  power  that  shook 
the  world  for  centuries.  The  absence  of  an}'  uniting  principle 
or  organism  has  left  the  vast  and  fertile  continent  of  Africa, 
with  its  teeming  millions,  an  undeveloped  waste  to  the  present 
day.  But  from  the  remotest  antiquity  the  Ilindoos  seem  to 
have  been  united  in  a  common  social  organization  of  the  strict- 
est discipline  and  subordination.  Priest,  and  warrior,  and  mer- 
chant, and  manual  laborer,  have  all  acknowledged  their  places, 
fro  that  for  ages  the  mechanism  of  the  great  social  clock  moved 
harmoniously.  All  classes  have  accepted  their  places  as  of 
Divine  allotment.  A  too  great  rigidity  has  precluded  growth 
beyond  a  certain  point,  most  certainly ;  but  the  ideas  of  or- 
ganic compact  and  division  of  labor,  and  of  due  subordination 
in  the  "  social  fabric,"  acquired  and  ingrained  by  a  growth  of 
(x-nturies,  are  invaluable  to  the  future  development  of  this  people. 
National  characteristics  like  these  are  not  the  growth  of  a  day. 

i>uch,  then,  is  the  intellectual,  religious,  and  social  ground- 
work of  the  leading  race  of  India.  Here  is  something  encour- 
aging on  which  to  build.  Keligion,  intelligence,  and  proper 
•ocial  habits  and  tendencies  in  regard  to  dependence  and  sub- 
ordination are  the  three  fundamental  elements  of  true 
national  greatness  and  prosperity.  It  may  be  safely  affirmed 
that  in  the  history  of  modern  evangelical  efforts  the  Gospel 
has  not  been  carried  to  a  nation  or  people  who  promise  so 
much  for  the  future.  From  a  careful  study  of  antiquity  it 
appears  that  India  was  the  fertile  center  from  which  philoso- 
phy, science,  religion,  and  ancient  civilization  spread  into  the 
surrounding  nations.     Arithmetic,  geometry,  astronomy,  logic, 

Nkw  Sbeies.  Vol.  XXI.— 3 


38  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

and  other  sciences,  with  various  philosophical  systems,  can  be 
traced  in  their  earliest  development  to  India.  In  after  ages 
Bhe  fell  into  a  moral  and  mental  apathy  all  the  more  remark- 
able from  her  former  religious  and  intellectual  activity.  But 
now  we  behold  the  sublime  spectacle  of  this  ancient  Aryan 
race,  from  the  confluence  of  a  kindred  stream  that  waudered 
away  to  the  Occident  ages  ago,  awaking  to  new  life  with  an 
energy  and  rapidity  that  betoken  a  glorious  future.  It  is  a 
marked  providence  of  God  that  has  given  this  great  people  to 
the  tuition  of  enlightened  Protestant  England.  France  and 
Portugal  were  before  in  occupancy. 

The  largest  missionary  force  in  any  foreign  field  has  been 
gathered  into  this  wide  harvest,  all  ready  for  the  laborer. 
Over  six  hundred  European  and  American  missionaries  are 
distributed  through  the  country  from  the  Punjaub  to  Ceylon. 

Having  thus  glanced  at  some  of  the  advantages  of  country 
and  people,  rendering  this  a  peculiarly  promising  field,  atten- 
tion is  asked  to  what  may  be  called  providential  aids  in  the 
prosecution  of  the  missionary  enterprise  in  India.  First  note 
the  presence  of  the  British  government.  The  jealousy  of 
other  nations  have  caused  them,  at  times,  to  reflect  on  British 
rule,  and  the  aggressions  of  British  power  in  India.  It  would 
not  be  a  human  government  that  never  committed  a  blunder 
or  was  chargeable  with  a  fault.  But  any  one  thoroughly 
acquainted  with  the  history  and  results  of  English  rule  in 
India  can  hardly  fail  to  see  that  it  has  been  an  untold  blessing 
and  mercy  to  the  land.  Is  it  a  small  thing  to  rescue  a  mild, 
intelligent,  reflective,  and  religiously  inclined  people  from  the 
heartless  ravages  of  fanatical  Moslem  power,  and  give  them 
stability,  security,  and  justice?  Is  it  a  small  thing  to  deliver 
a  vast  people,  by  the  strong  arm  of  law,  from  the  cruel,  crush- 
ing customs  of  their  own  religious  folly — to  quench  fiame8 
that  consigned  annually  to  an  untimely  and  most  shocking 
death  hundreds  of  unoffending  widows— to  paralyze  uncounted 
thousands  of  brutal  arms,  and  save  multitudes  of  wailing  infants 
from  an  inhuman, barbarous  death,  unknown  to  the  very  beasts 
of  the  field  i  In  a  word,  is  it  a  small  thing  to  take  hold  of  a 
vnst  country  all  in  anarchy,  and  full  of  ignorance,  lawlessness, 
and  rapacity,  and  give  it  wholesome  law,  and  order,  and  im- 
provement in  art,  and  enlightenment  in  science?     All  this 


38C9J  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  39 

British  power  and  rule  have  done  for  India.  But  the  point 
that  we  wish  to  present  is,  that  the  presence  of  this  government 
affords  to  the  people  of  India  every  facility  and  advantage 
that  this  enlightened  age  possesses  for  development  in  all  that 
belongs  to  human  well-being.  By  so  much  is  it  an  aid  to  the 
missionary.  Besides  this,  it  gives  security  to  the  missionary 
in  this  work.  No  one  acquainted  with  the  spirit  and  practice 
of  Islamism  can  doubt  how  missionaries  and  their  work  would 
fare  in  India  were  the  segis  of  British  power  removed.  Conti- 
guity to  Europe,  and  the  restraint  of  Christian  governments, 
secure  some  toleration  to  evangelistic  efforts  throughout  most 
Of  the  Turkish  empire :  but  it  would  hardly  be  so  in  India 
under  Moslem  rule.  Moreover,  even  the  Hindoos,  compar- 
atively mild,  and  free  from  violent  bigotry  as  they  seem,  would 
present  a  different  attitude  in  the  absence  of  British  dominion. 
Missionaries  can  readily  see  that  they  would  be  much  restricted 
in  their  efforts,  and  often  cut  off  from  promising  openings. 
Ik-sides  all  this,  government  gives  liberal  monetary  aid  in  the 
maintenance  of  mission  schools  and  medical  missions.  All 
this  is  direct  aid  to  evangelistic  work. 

We  mark  another  providential  aid  to  the  spread  of  Christi- 
anity in  India  in  the  independent  educational  effort  of  the 
government.  To  the  enlightened  Christian  it  must  be  grat- 
ifying and  encouraging  to  know  that  Yictoria's  government 
spends  annually  one  million  four  hundred  thousand  dollars 
for  the  education  of  her  Indian  subjects,  and  that  hundreds 
'•t  thousands  of  boys  and  girls  are  receiving  enlightened 
instruction;  and  that  the  dark  cloud  of  superstition  and 
idolatry  is  being  lifted  away  by  the  mental  light  that  comes 
Mealing  through  the  darkness,  softly  as  the  approach  of  morn- 
ing twilight.  Government  is  doing  a  noble  work  for  the 
enlightenment  of  India.  Calcutta  can  boast  its  University, 
which  is  no  mere  name.  Connected  with  this,  on  a  regular 
plan  of  education,  are  more  than  a  score  of  colleges,  scattered 
through  all  parts  of  India.  Besides  the  University  and  its 
affiliated  colleges,  there  are  thousands  of  smaller  schools  of  all 
grades  throughout  the  land,  the  number  of  which  is  rapidly 
increasing.  Education  is  conducted  both  in  English  and  the 
vernacular,  and  is  substantially  that  of  the  most  approved 
European  and  American  system.     Intellectual  education  and 


40  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

enlightenment  being  the  friend  of  Christianity,  the  English 
government  is  accomplishing  an  immense  work  for  the  final 
triumph  of  the  Gospel  in  India.  "Where  in  any  other  part 
of  the  world  do  we  find  such  an  aid  extended  to  one  hundred 
and  thirty  millions  of  non-Christian  people  ? 

Another  providential  aid  in  the  evangelization  of  India  is 
found  in  the  English  language  itself.  This  aid  has  special 
phases  whicli  are  now  to  be  brought  under  consideration.  We 
do  not  indulge  the  speculation  that  the  English  language  is  to 
become  the  vernacular  of  India.  There  are  many  conclusive 
reasons  why  such  a  result  is  improbable.  Nevertheless  it  is 
destined  to  exert  a  most  powerful  influence  on  the  races  of 
India  in  aid  of  civilization  and  Christianity.  The  English 
language,  spoken  and  written,  is  now  a  settled  fact  in  India. 
No  human  power  can  eradicate  it.  Were  India,  freed  from 
the  English,  to  continue  henceforth  forever  isolated  from  the 
"West,  the  English  linguistic  element  would  remain  a  power 
in  it,  shaping  and  shading  the  mental  and  moral  life  of 
the  people.  Such  is  the  extent  to  which  it  has  already  incor- 
porated itself  in  the  language  and  literature  of  the  country. 
We  are  dealing  here  with  a  subtle,  puissant  agent.  No  human 
mind  can  follow  up  and  estimate  the  all-pervading,  potent 
influence  of  the  language  and  literature  of  Greece  on  the 
moral  and  mental  life  of  conquering  Rome,  .and  in  turn,  of 
conquered  Rome  on  the  moral  and  intellectual  life  of  the  con- 
quering hordes  of  the  North.  In  both  these  striking  illus- 
trations of  this  subject  the  influence  was  palpable  and  un- 
bounded, and  still  rolls  on  in  an  ever-widening  wave.  A  lan- 
guage, with  its  literature,  is  not  the  growth  of  a  day.  Count- 
less social  and  political  vicissitudes,  with  centuries  of  thinking 
and  writing,  wrought  out  the  language  and  built  up  the  liter- 
ature of  classic  Greece  and  Rome. 

No  less  numerous  have  been  the  changes  while  the  mental 
travail  of  many  added  centuries  have  been  exhausted  in  making 
the  English  language  and  literature  what  they  are  at  the  present 
time.  This  power,  with  all  its  capability  of  shading  and  fash- 
ioning the  life  and  destiny  of  the  people,  is  present  in  India. 
It  lias  always  been  a  question  with  the  English  government 
just  how  far  to  make  an  effort  for  the  spread  and  establishment 
of  English  in  the  country.     A  desire  on  the  part  of  the  natives 


I6C0-]  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  41 

to  learn  the  language,  and  a  growing  conviction  of  its  conven- 
ience and  importance  in  the  government  and  enlightenment 
of  the  people,  have  led  to  increased  efforts  to  introduce  English 
extensively  throughout  India.  The  education  imparted  in  the 
University  and  numerous  colleges  of  the  country  is  chiefly  in 
English.  Much  of  the  work  of  the  government  in  various 
departments  require  more  or  less  knowledge  of  English.  This 
has  established  a  demand  for  an  acquaintance  with  it  which 
is  increasing.  In  illustration  of  the  extent  to  which  English 
is  being  studied,  it  may  be  stated,  that  in  the  Northwest 
Provinces  alone,  a  division  of  one  of  the  three  British  Pres- 
idencies, more  than  forty  thousand  pupils  were  studying  En- 
glish in  the  schools  and  colleges  in  1S67.  It  is  true  that  the 
government,  in  its  neutral  policy,  has  excluded  text-books  of  a 
directly  religious  character,  but  yet  the  book's  studied  rapidly 
undermine  the  faith  of  the  natives.  An  incident  among 
thousands  illustrates  this.  A  pupil  entered  Bareilly  College 
a  bigoted  Hindoo,  but  at  the  end  of  two  years,  so  much  had 
English  affected  his  mind,  that  he  used,  as  he  passed  from  the 
college,  to  spit  with  contempt  on  a  sacred  tree  that  stood  near 
by.  This  effect  must  be  much  lightened  where  missionaries  use, 
as  they  do,  religious  text-books.  Suffice  it  to  say  on  this  point, 
that  thousands  of  natives  can  speak  and  write  English  some- 
what readily,  and  intelligently  read  English  books.  Several 
native  presses  are  issuing  English  papers,  and  printing  books 
fur  natives.  Here  there  is  a  mighty  influence  present  in  India, 
the  aid  of  which,  in  the  cause  of  evangelization,  must  be  great 
beyond  calculation.  The  reader  can  dwell  at  leisure  on  the 
ramifications  of  this  influence  as  it  finds  its  way  through 
translations  of  English  books,  and  the  intercourse  of  the  student 
ol  English  with  less  favored  relatives  and  associates. 
^  The  suggestion  has  some  ground  that  the  influence  of  English 
literature  may  not  always  be  good.  And  it  is  to  be  regretted 
that  already,  in  India,  English  deistical  books  are  consulted  by  a 
ecrtain  cla>>s  of  educated  natives.  Nevertheless,  there  is  a  greatly 
preponderating  weight  of  influence  brought  to  bear  through 
the  English  language  and  literature  in  favor  of  Christianity,  so 
that  missionaries  recognize  here  one  of  their  most  hopeful 
evangelizing  aids. 

Somewhat  kindred  to  the  help  just  presented  is  that  of  the 


42  India  as  a  Misswn  Field.  [January, 

Indian  vernacular  languages  themselves,  in  which  the  mission- 
ary finds  providential  facilities  for  imparting  Christian  truth 
to  the  native  mind.  We  are  dealing  here  with  no  mere  fancy. 
Those  who  have  gone  with  the  Gospel  of  salvation  to  people  of 
other  tongues,  and  who  have  labored  for  the  establishment  of 
Christianity  in  their  midst  by  translating  the  Word  of  God 
and  building  up  a  Christian  literature,  can  testify  to  the  formi- 
dable difficulties  that  are  often  to  be  overcome.  It  is  a  matter 
of  special  gratulation  when  a  language  is  met  which,  by  its 
affinities  or  capabilities,  or  both  these,  presents  a  convenient 
and  expressive  medium  for  the  ready  impartation  of  divine 
truth.  Our  China  mission  recently  furnished  an  illustration 
of  missionary  perplexity  from  this  source  in  a  spirited  discus- 
sion as  to  the  most  suitable  word  for  the  Divine  Being,  couch- 
ing the  Christian  conception.  Sometimes  the  work  of  years 
must  be  undone,  and  sometimes  years  are  required  to  build  up 
a  theological  language  for  the  people.  "We  can  here  only  state 
the  fact  briefly,  that  the  vernaculars  of  India  are  singularly 
adapted  as  media  for  the  communication  of  every  shade  and 
form  of  religious  thought  and  truth.  Enriched  from  three  of 
the  most  wonderful  developments  of  human  speech,  they 
are  expressive,  flexible,  and  fertile  for  every  possible  pur- 
pose. They  have  drawn  from  the  theological  terminology 
of  Arabic,  the  graceful  phraseology  of  Persian,  and  from 
the  profoundly  metaphysical  capabilities  of  Sanscrit.  The 
language  of  no  country  on  the  globe  has  a  combination 
of  more  felicitous  factors.  Words  for  the  one  God,  trinity, 
regeneration,  atonement,  repentance,  incarnation,  hell,  heaven, 
etc.,  are  at  hand  for  the  use  of  the  missionary.  Great  facility 
has  been  thus  afforded  for  making  the  numerous  versions  of 
the  Sacred  Scripture  and  the  hundreds  of  books  and  tracts  that 
already  are  circulating  in  this  country. 

We  have  thus  presented  some  of  the  points  which  constitute 
India  pre-eminently  the  grandest  and  most  hopeful  foreign 
mission  field  now  open  to  the  evangelistic  efforts  of  Christen- 
dom. We  have  glanced  at  the  physical  geography  and  natural 
history  of  India,  which  mark  it  as  a  great  country.  The 
ethnographic  relations  of  the  inhabitants,  and  their  intel- 
lectual and  religious  characteristics,  have  been  presented  a^  a 
most  hopeful  basis  for  missionary  effort,  and  as  auguring  the 


1809.3  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  43 

future  greatness  of  this  people.  Some  marked  providential 
helps  in  the  work  of  evangelism  have  been  presented — as  the 
presence  of  a  powerful,  enlightened,  and  liberal  Christian 
government — its  special  efforts  for  the  education  of  its  heathen 
and  non-Christian  subjects — the  spread  of  the  English  language 
and  literature  among  the  people,  and  the  remarkable  aptitude 
and  availability  of  the  vernacular  languages  and  dialects  of 
the  country  as  media  for  the  communication  of  the  Gospel 
aud  Christian  truth.  No  other  country  presents  such  a  favor- 
able combination  of  facilities  for  missionary  work.  "We  may 
lift  up  our  eyes  and  see  a  vast  field  "  all  white  to  harvest." 
A  great  door  and  effectual  is  wide  open — we  may  hear  the 
voice  of  not  one,  but  millions,  saying,  "  Come  over  and  help 
us." 

The  success  so  far  achieved  clearly  indicates  that  the  opening 
here  is  a  real  one.  All  things  seem  now  ready — the  Holy 
Ghost  no  longer  forbids;  and  "the  fullness"' of  these  East- 
ern "  Gentiles  "  seems  ready  to  "  come  in."  Figures  will  give 
a  more  lively  appreciation  of  what  has  been  done.  Let  it 
he  home  in  mind  that  about  a  half  century  covers  the  period 
of  free  aud  active  missionary  effort  in  India.  Fourteen  en- 
tire versions  of  the  "Word  of  God  have  been  made  in  various 
languages  and  dialects,  and  in  whole  or  in  part  in  twenty- 
five  different  languages  and  dialects.  .  In  the  last  ten  years 
alone  upward  of  two  million  copies  of  the  Sacred  Scriptures, 
in  whole  or  in  part,  have  been  distributed.  Within  the  same 
period  about  one  thousand  distinct  works,  books,  and  tracts 
have  been  issued  in  the  vernaculars,  and  a  circulation  of  at 
least  ten  million  copies  of  these  has  been  effected.  In  the 
ii<-<'<'tnplishinent  of  this,  thirty  mission  presses  are  at  work,  some 
of  them  very  large.  Already  a  Protestant  native  Church  of  but 
little  short  of  two  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  members  has 
been  raised  up;  and  at  the  present  ratio  of  increase  the  entire 
population  of  India  would  become  Christian  in  something 
more  than  one  century.  This  calculation  does  not  include  the 
Romanist  missions,  whose  converts  double  those  of  Protestant 
missions,  which,  however,  have  entered  the  field  much  later. 
Bnch  is  the  promising  foundation  laid  for  Christianity  in  India, 
the  grandest  country  of  Asia.  We  can  hardly  mistake  her 
destiny.     She  is  to  the  great  oceans  stretching  south  and  east, 


4Jt  India  as  a  Mission  Field.  [January, 

and  to  the  eastern  countries  whose  shores  are  laved  by  them 
what  Palestine  was  to  the  Mediterranean  and  the  Levant. 
India  has  now  extended  through  all  her  mighty  frame  electric 
machinery,  political  and  evangelistic,  which  must  very  rapidly 
vitalize  her  myriad  population  with  a  better,  nobler  life.  She 
seems  destined,  as  from  antiquity,  still  to  lead  the  van  of 
Asiatic  countries.  She  has  given  to  this  vast  continent  science, 
philosophy,  false  religion,  and  idolatry:  to  her  it  may  be 
reserved  to  give  these  countries  the  Gospel  of  the  Son  of  God. 
This  is  a  worthy  field  of  conflict  for  the  six  hundred  mission- 
aries engaged  here  to-day,  who  should  be  soon  joined  by  twice 
6ix  hundred  more.  It  would  seem  that  the  final  great  battle 
of  idolatry,  and  perhaps  of  Mohammedanism,  doctrinally, 
must  be  fought  here.  Politically  this  great  people  has  been 
given  to  the  Son  ;  and  the  time  may  not  be  distant  when  from 
the  peninsula  of  Hindostan,  radiant  with  the  light  of  Him 
who  "lighteneth  every  man  that  cometh  into  the  world," 
and  washed  by  the  blood  that  flowed  from  Calvary,  floods  of 
light  and  truth  will  pour  over  all  the  populous  East.  A 
glance  at  a  map  of  Asia  will  recall  the  peculiar  position 
in  the  continent  that  India  occupies.  Russian  swords  are 
fast  cutting  a  highway  down  to  Cabul  in  the  northwest ;  while 
Great  Britain,  by  an  exploring  expedition,  is  at  this  hour 
peacefully  opening  a  highway  in  the  northeast,  up  through 
Burinah,  to  the  head  waters  of  the  great  rivers  of  China. 
Soon  the  electric  current  will  be  established,  and  over  these 
two  highways  Christianity  and  Christian  civilization  will  be 
spreading  north  through  the  vast,  populous  area  of  Central  Asia. 
The  great  weight  of  the  world's  population  still  lies  in  Asia. 
In  pushing  far  to  the  West,  Christianity  fled  to  the  wilder- 
ness, where,  nurtured  and  developed  into  a  mighty  power, 
and  divinely  fitted  to  elevate  and  bless  these  countless 
millions,  it  moves  back  upon  the  East,  "traveling  in  the 
greatness  of  its  strength,  and  mighty  to  "save."  In  Persia, 
Tartary,  India,  Burmah,  and  China,  the  great  body  of  the 
human  race  is  massed.  What  a  conquest  there  is  for  Cluis- 
tiauity  yet  to  make  !  but  the  key  position  is  already  securer  in 
India. 


i£Cft.l  John  Tauter  and  hu  Theology.  45 


Art.  Ul.— JOHN  TAULER  AND.  HIS  THEOLOGY. 

The  statement  of  a  modern  writer  *  that  "  mysticism  has  no 
point  of  contact  with  the  scientific-  spirit  of  our  times,  but  has 
a  simple  historic  interest,"  ^  must  be  accepted  with  wide  quali- 
fications. Rather,  may  it  not  have  a  direct  and  powerful 
influence  on  every  age?  since  the  principles  from  which  it 
springs  lie  deeply  planted  in  the  human  mind,  and  will  unfold 
ind  develop  themselves  just  so  surely  as  seeds  will  germinate 
and  reproduce  their  kind  whenever  the  proper  conditions  of 
growth  are  fulfilled. 

Just  as  the  same  plants  by  neglect  or  unwise  husbandry,  by 
excess  of  heat  or  cold,  may  yield  imperfect,  gnarled,  and  acrid 
results, — or,  again,  by  careful  pruning,  by  skillful  adjustment 
of  light  and  shade  and  moisture,  may  gladden  the  heart  of  the 
toiler  with  a  luxuriance  of  melting,  luscious  fruits — so  may 
rny.-tieism,  unrestrained,  degenerate  into  the  abominations  of 
the  Indian  system,  a  deification  of  self,  an  indifference  to  the 
rights  and  wants  of  our  fellows,  and  a  destruction  of  all  moral 
distinctions;  or,  regulated  and  controlled  by  reason,  instructed 
by  the  Scriptures  of  divine  truth,  and  sanctified  by  the  Spirit, 
the  soul  may  be  led  to  God,  the  Center  of  all  light,  all  knowl- 
edge, all  blessing,  only  to  be  sent  forth  again,  an  angel  of  love 
and  mercy,  to  minister  to  the  great  family  of  sorrow. 

Of  all  moral  darkness  that  has  settled  down  upon  the  Chris- 
tum world,  none  was  more  dense  than  that  experienced  during 
t!.-  thirteenth  century.  The  historic  student  is  compelled  to 
trmvel  no  more  arid  waste.   . 

I  lie  Papacy,  never  more  really  sunken  and  despicable  in 
itself,  was  never  more  arrogant  in  pretension.  As  has  so  fre- 
quently happened  in  her  subsequent  history,  spiritual  fulrai- 
nations  supplied  tho-lack  of  temporal  power  and  personal 
worth.  The  deeper  was  the  moral  degradation,  the  loftier 
was  the  Papal  claim.  In  Italy  the  implacable  war  between 
the  rival  factions,  Guelph  and  Ghibcrline,  had  reached  even  to 
the  chair  of  St.  Peter's.  The  powerful  family  of  Colonna,  now 
numbering  among  its   members  two  cardinals,  was  in  open 

°  Koack,  "Die  Chriatlicho  Mystik,"  1853. 


46  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  [January 

rebellion  against  Boniface  VIII.*  Rome  being  unsafe,  Clem- 
ent V.  had,  in  1305,  taken  refuge  under  the  shadow  of  the 
French  throne  at  Avignon,  thus  placing  St.  Peter's  keys  in 
the  hands  of  the  French  King.  During  the  disgraceful  struggle 
of  John  XXII.  with  Louis  of  Bavaria,  by  an  edict  of  excom- 
munication thousands  and  tens  of  thousands  of  innocent 
people  were  deprived  for  many  years  of  all  means  of  grace. 
The  clergy  being  absorbed  in  thoughts  of  temporal  aggran- 
dizement, all  concern  for  the  spiritual  welfare  of  the  Church  had 
well-nigh  died  out.  "  Nothing  was  left  but  the  sanctuary  of 
the  human  heart."  f 

Though  the  schoolmen  reckoned  among  their  number  the 
most  acute  and  powerful  thinkers  of  both  the  great  religions 
orders,  (Dominican  and  Franciscan,)  still  in  vain  could  the 
earnest,  burdened  soul  betake  itself  for  consolation  to  this 
ruling  philosophy.  In  other  centuries,  and  under  the  influence 
of  a  more  generous  system,  great  minds,  as  Origen  and  Bce- 
thius,  had  found  at  least  a  temporary  satisfaction  in  ponderino- 
the  momentous  subjects  of  the  Platonic  speculation.  But  now 
almost  the  last  spark  of  this  divine  philosophy  .  had  been 
quenched  by  the  cold,  ban-en  scholasticism  every-wherc  pre- 
vailing. The  truly  sharpened  intellect  was  busy  with  dead 
logical  formulas  from  which  had  been  pressed  all  savin g  truth. 
Soulless  dialectics  brought  no  food  to  the  hungry  mind.  Its 
intellectual  brilliancy  was  accompanied  by  no  life-giving  prin- 
ciple. Sin-burdened  hearts  especially  found  here  no  peace. 
Bather  was.  its  splendor  like  that  of  northern  icebergs,  in 
whose  presence  dwells  perpetual  death. 

The  art  of  this  period  that  still  survives -is  confirmatory  of 
the  written  record,  and  tells  of  the  same  sad  story  of  a  world 
from  which  had  been  banished  the  tender,  loving  Saviour. 
The  stiff,  heartless  Byzantine  art  had  represented  Christ  with 
the  relentless  sternness  of  a  judge  ;  even  the  face  of  the  child 
Jesus  wore  more  of  a  repulsive  frown  than  a  gracious  invita- 
tion.    Mary  herself  was   now  too  severe  for  sympathy  with 

c  Dante  speaks  of  Eouiface,  Inferno,  xxvii,  S5-S3  : 

"  The  leader  of  the  modern  Pharisees, 
Having  a  war  near  unto  the  Lnteran, 
And  not  with  Saracens  nor  with  the  Jews." — Longfellow's  Trans. 

f  Bohringer,  "Kirche  Christi  u.  ihre  Zeugen.     Vol.  i,  p.  8. 


]  SCO.]  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  47 

human  woes  and  weakness.  The  human  mind  must  have 
K/nu  mediator.  Hence  the  frequent  canonization  of  saints, 
urn!  the  reliance  upon  the  intercessions  of  those  who  had  truly 
fell  human  sorrows,  aud  would  certainly  be  touched  with  the 
feeling  of  our  infirmities.  No  wonder,  then,  that  when  Cima- 
bue  60  broke  away  from  the  stiffness  and  severity  of  this 
school  as  to  throw  over  the  face  of  his  Madonna  and  child  a 
my  of  sunshine  and  holy  benevolence,  the  Florentines  in  joy- 
ful procession  conducted  the  artist  and  his  work  to  its  future 
resting-place  in  San  Maria  Novella. 

From  this  sketch  the  state  of  public  morals  could  be  easily 
foretold.  The  masses  must  not  be  expected  to  surpass  their 
leaders.  If  Pope  and  Sacred  College  cherish  the  most  infernal 
spirit  of  jealousy  and  ambition,  we  may  not  look  for  disinter- 
estedness in  the  inferior  clergy.  If  lust  and  debauch  have 
done  their  sad  work  on  orders  devoted  to  chastity  by  most 
folemn  vows,  into  what  depths  of  impurity  may  not  the  com- 
mon people  plunge  ?  If  oaths,  ratified  under  the  most  awful 
solemnities,  vanished  before  temptation  as  flax  before  the  flame, 
what  guaranty  for  probity  in  every-day  commercial  life  ?  More 
than  realized  are  our  worst  deductions.  At  this  time  Chris- 
tianity had  little  to  do  with  ethics;  it  was  not  a  power  for 
daily  restraint  and  guidance.  The  state  of  business  morals 
was  sad  indeed  ;  usury,  over-reaching,  and  all  manner  of  dis- 
honesty being  openly  and  shamelessly  practiced.  Even  the 
clergy  allowed  all  to  be  done  for  money.*  Adultery  was  com- 
monly practiced;  the  assignation  of  children  was  frequent.  In' 
fine,  it  was  an  age  of  cruelty,  lust,  slavery,  and  wrong  of 
every  kind.  Oppression  stalked  abroad  unchecked,  manners 
vera  harsh,  language  gross.  "  Might  made  right;"  chastity 
ami  innocence  could  scarcely  find  a  home  even  in  the  cloister. 
Specially  in  the  Rhine  country  and  along  the  Elbe  was  the 
e-odnl  condition  terribly  deplorable.  Commerce  upon  these 
rivers  was  constantly  interrupted  by  bands  of  lawless  men, 
urged  on  by  necessity  or  sheer  love  of  booty.  In  the  absence 
«'f  legal  restraint  and  protection  industry  languished  ;  faith  in 
man  was  well-nigh  extinct ;  society  seemed  hastening  to  speedy 
dissolution.  As  is  ever  the  case  in  an  absence  of  genuine  piety, 
afflictions  drove  men  to  terrible  excesses;  natural  affections 

•  Soo  "Nicholas  von  Basel,''  in  Gic.-ebreclit's  "  Damans"  for  1SG5,  p.  194. 


"48  John,  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

died ;  love  and  sympathy  were  supplanted  by  the  most  intense 
and  heartless  selfishness.  "  In  many  hundred  years  there  has 
not  been  such  need  that  the  people  should  hear  the  truth  from 
the  lips  of  the  Preacher."  *  "  The  universal  love  is  quenched 
in  every  quarter  of  the  globe." 

"We  have  already  remarked  that  the  germs  of  peculiar  forms 
of  political  and  religious  life  ever  lie  hidden  in  the  soil  of  society, 
and  that  they  only  await  favorable  influences  to  develop  into 
a  harvest  of  blessing  or  of  woe.  The  foregoing  sketch  will 
reveal  the  influences  at  work,  during  the  thirteenth  and  four- 
teenth centuries,  that  awakened  to  a  more  powerful  life  than 
ever  before  the  tendencies  to  mysticism  ever  lying  latent  in 
the  human  mind. 

The  mysticism  then  developed  may  be  regarded  as  a  power- 
ful protest  chiefly  against  the  terrible  corruptions  of  the  Pornish 
Church,  and  the  cold,  barren  speculations  of  scholasticism. 
The  wide-reaching  distractions  in  the  State — the  dissolution  of 
social  relations,  caused  partially  by  the  terrible  natural  phe- 
nomena of  earthquakes,  famine,  and  pestilence,  so  far  spread- 
ing in  this  period — the  unbridled  passions  of  Pope  and  Prel- 
ates— the  decay  of  purity  of  life  in  the  cloisters — all  tended  to 
drive  thinking  men  who  were  longing  for  a  better  life,  to  seek 
direct  communion  with  God — to  obtain  a  vision  of  the  Almighty, 
immediate,  undimmed  by  any  interposing  vail  of  form  or  sym- 
bol, unchanged  by  any  distorting  medium,  f 

Remarks  the  pious  Spener :  "  God's  grace  is  abundantly 
■manifested  in  the  fact,  that  in  every  time  of  deepest  gloom  in 
human  history  a  few  have  been  found  in  whose  hearts  truth 
has  found  a  home,  and  who  have  been  stout  witnesses  of  this 
truth  to  others."  X  These  few  have  ever  been  the  conserva- 
tors of  truth ;  and  no  more  true  is  it  that  God,  for  the  ten's 
sake,  would  have  spared  the  cities  of  the  plain,  than  that  the 
prayers  and  faith  and  labors  of  the  faithful  few  in  every  subse- 
quent age  have  been  the  "  salt,"  saving  the  world  from  utter 
putridity.  Such  a  man  was  John  Tauler,  the  profound  phil- 
osophical mystic — the  bold,  earnest,  practical  preacher,  the 
warm-hearted  philanthropist  and  friend. 

He  was  probably  born   at  Strasburg  in  1290.  §     Of  honor- 

*  "  Nicholas  von  Basel,''  p.  179.  f  Schmidt,  "  Johan.  Tauler,  von  Strasburg,"  p.  90. 
X  Preface  to  Tauler's  Works.  §  Authorities  greatly  difl'er  as  to  time  and  place. 


iSOO.]  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  49 

able  family,  he  was  early  devoted  to  the  priestly  office,  con- 
necting himself  with  the  Dominican  order.  Soon  after  we 
find  him  studying  theology  in  Paris,  where  were  teaching 
wrnie  of  the  most  eminent  schoolmen  of  the  age.  The  popu- 
lar philosophy  seems  to  have  had  little  attraction  for  young 
Tuulcr ;  for  his  attention  was  rather  directed  to  the  mystical 
and  speculative  writers  of  the  Church,  such  as  Pseudo-Diony- 
fius,  the  Victors,  St.  Bernard,  and  before  all  others,  to  Augus- 
tine. Strasburg  had  long  been  a  center  of  mystical  thought. 
On  his  return  from  Paris  Tauler  was  powerfully  influenced 
by  the  celebrated  Master  Eckart,  Nicholas  of  Strasburg,  and 
ether  earnest  thinkers  and  practical  workers,  who  seem  to 
have  made  Strasburg  the  center  of  their  consultation  and 
etfurt.  Among  the  many  societies  that  were  called  into  being 
by  the  interdict  of  John  XXII.,  and  by  the  consequent  forsak- 
ing of  the  churches  and  people  by  the  clergy,  was  the  "  Friends 
of  God.1'  This  society  was  composed  of  persons  from  all 
classes  of  society,  and  from  all  the  religious  orders,  bound 
together  for  purposes  of  religious  edification  and  for  keeping 
alive  the  truth  in  the  community.  It  extended  throughout 
*nd  even  beyond  the  Rhine  country,  and  included  among  its 
members  some  of  the  most  deeply  religious  men  of  this  cen- 
tury, nearly  all  of  whom  were  of  a  strongly  mystical  tendency. 
With  this  society  Tauler  connected  himself,  and  in  it  labored 
all  his  life.  He  soon  began  to  arrest  attention  by  the  vigor  and 
eloquence  of  his  sermons  at  Strasburg,  Basel,  and  Cologne. 
Delivered  mostly  in  the  German  language,  the  character  of 
bis  discourses  charmed  the  common  mind.  While  Master 
bckartwas  wondered  at  as  a  prodigy,  and  venerated  by  a 
people  unable  to  comprehend  the  subtleties  of  his  speculations, 
or  tii  wander  into  the  region  of  obscure  twilight  where  he 
delighted  to  linger,  Tauler's  sermons  came  home  to  the  popu- 
lar andereUnding,  and  touched  the  popular  heart.  The 
admiring  crowds  found  in  him  a  real  shepherd  of  souls,  who 
led  them  from  the  dreary,  arid  wastes  into  green  pastures  and 
beside  the  still  waters.  Few  men  had  had  the  boldness  to 
protect  against  the  ruling  fashion  of  thought,  fewer  still  had 
•neceeded  in  finding  that  true,  abiding  peace  which  man's 
»ul  k>  much  covets.  Even  Tauler  himself,  up  to  this  time, 
■•ems  to  have   preached  to  the  people  truths  which  he  him- 


50  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

Belf  embraced  with  the  intellect  rather  than  experienced  in 
the  heart. 

In  1346,  when  his  fame  as  a  preacher  had  become  wide- 
reaching,  and  when  he  had  already  aroused  the  jealousy  and 
hatred  of  the  Church  authorities  by  the  plainness  of  his  charges 
and  the  severity  of  his  rebukes,  occurred  a  visit  that  was  des- 
tined to  play  a  most  important  part  in  Tauler's  future  history. 

Nicholas  of  Basel  had  heard  of  the  fame  of  the  great  Stras- 
burg  preacher.  That  Nicholas  had  heard  Tauler's  sermons  on 
occasion  of  the  latter's  visit  to  Easel  is  not  certain  ;  certain 
it  is,  however,  that  the  substance  of  these  discourses  had  been 
reported  to  him.  In  the  fourteenth  century,  to  make  a  journey 
on  foot  from  Basel  to  Strasburg  to  hear  a  preacher  must  have 
been  regarded  as  no  small  evidence  of  interest  and  devotion. 
To  Strasburg  came  this  pilgrim  to  find  the  truth.  It  would 
seem  that  this  Nicholas  was  one  of  those  few,  chosen  men 
among  the  laity  whom  God  blesses  with  a  humble  mind,  with 
a  clear  revelation  of  the  plan  of  salvation,  and  honors  as  the 
instrumentality  of  leading  others  to  the  fountains  of  living 
waters.  Belonging  to  the  heretical  sect  of  the  Waldenses,  he 
also  stood  at  the  head  of  the  society  of  the  "  Friends  of  God  " 
in  Basel.  Gifted,  it  would  seem,  with  rare  practical  sense. 
with  a  keen  insight  into  the  springs  of  human  conduct,  and, 
more  than  all,  blessed  with  a  quickened  spiritual  instinct  to 
distinguish  between  the  spurious  and  genuine  in  religious 
teaching  and  experience,  this  layman  took  his  place  in  the 
congregation  at  Strasburg,  to  be  fed  by  the  manna  that  God 
would  give  the  people  by  the  hands  of  the  preacher  whoso 
fame  had  spread  so  far  and  wide.  After  listening  to  Tauler 
five  times,  Nicholas's  judgment  of  the  preacher  is  remarkable, 
namely,  that  he  was  a  sweet-tempered,  kind-hearted,  excellent 
man,  powerful  in  the  Scriptures,  but  ignorant  of  the  light  of 
grace  in  the  soul.  After  enunciating  in  a  carefully-prepared 
discourse  twenty-four  characteristics  of  a  truly  divine  life  in 
the  soul,  and  preaching  yet  again  on  a  perfect  life,  he  is  plainly 
told  by  this  layman,  (who  in  the  mean  time  had  made  Tauler 
his  confessor,)  that  although  a  great  priest,  his  preaching 
amounted  to  absolutely  nothing,  because  the  preacher  did  not 
practice  his  own  precepts  ;  that  God  can  teach  the  soul  more 
of  truth  in  one  hour  than  this  learned  priest,  should  he  preach 


J  SCO.]  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  51 

until  the  judgment  day.  His  doctrines  were  scriptural ;  but 
how  could  truth  flow  through  such  muddy  and  impure  chan- 
nels nnd  not  itself  become  contaminated.  Nicholas  declares 
Tauler  a  perfect  Pharisee,  laying  grievous  burdens  upon  men's 
shoulders,  while  he  would,  not  touch  one  with  his  fingers  ;  he 
charges  him  with  seeking  the  honors  of  men  more  than  the 
glory  of  God ;  he  declares  that  Tauler  is  yet  in  the  darkness 
of  his  sins,  as  is  manifest  from  the  few  who  are  iurned  from 
wickedness  to  God.  With  a  humility  almost  unheard-of  in 
that  age  of  ecclesiastical  superiority  and  assumption,  the  con- 
fessor desires  to  become  the  pupil.  Nicholas  then  relates  to 
Tauler  some  of  his  own  experience ;  he  speaks  of  the  mistakes 
he  had  committed  in  his  own  efforts  to  come  to  God  ;  what 
tortures  he  had  endured  to  make  himself  humble  and  accept- 
able in  God's  sight.  A  voice  told  him  this  was  all  of  the 
devil,  for  God  alone  could  teach  him.  Then  the  reason  was 
u*ed  to  find  God.  This,  too,  was  a  grand  error  and  a  sin ; 
for,  "Had  we  such  a  God  as  our  reason  could  grasp  and  com- 
prehend, I  would  not  give  a  fig  for  him."  Tauler's  sense  of 
ecclesiastical  dignity  was  still  a  stumbling-block  in  the  way  of 
his  conversion,  and  he  plainly  confesses  to  Nicholas :  u  It 
greatly  troubles  me  that  you  are  only  a  layman,  while  I  am 
a  noted  master  of  the  Scriptures,  and  yet  you  are  my  teacher." 
Nicholas  refers  to  instances  in  the  history  of  the  Church  where 
holy  men  and  women  bad  been  taught  by  the  Spirit  through 
children  as  an  instrumentality,  "and  why  may  not  this  same 
Spirit  use  me  as  your  teacher?"  The  study  of  the  love  of 
«  brut  in  the  agonies  he  had  endured  for  our  salvation,  consti- 
tuted the  substance  of  the  discipline  that  Tauler  was  to  prac- 
tice. Keen  and  penetrating  were  the  pangs  he  felt  in  view  of 
Christ's  love.  The  awful  depths  of  depravity  of  a  man  who 
had  professed  to  be  a  leader  of  the  people,  a  shepherd  of  God's 
flock,  a  teacher  of  purity,  were  discovered  in  all  their  ugliness 
and  hatcfuluess  to  God.  His  whole  nature  was  stirred^  unut- 
teruble  agonies  were  suffered.  To  add  to  his  sorrows,  his  fel- 
low-monks made  him  the  object  of  special  taunt  and  ridicule. 
1  beif  la/.y  souls  could  not  comprehend  the  terrible  earnestness 
«'f  their  comrade.  In  the  absence  of  a  teacher  to  tell  him  of 
the  simplicity  of  faith,  this  great  man  struggled  on  in  his  cell 
for  two  long  years,  searching  for  God  in  the  deep  darkness  of 


52  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

his  own  depravity,  yet  resolved  to  find  him  or  perish  in  the 
attempt.  Finally,  after  suffering  sorest  trials  even  from  his 
friends,  being  reduced  to  the  merest  skeleton  by  long-contin- 
ued fasting  and  sickness,  on  the  night  of  St.-Panl's,  (January 
25,)  as  he  tells  us,  he  was  visited  by  the  sorest  temptation 
yet  experienced.  But  while  sitting  in  his  cell,  suddenly  recur- 
red to  him  the  thought  how  much  Christ  Jesus  had  suffered 
for  him,  and  how  light  his  own  trials  in  comparison  with  those 
of  his  suffering  Lord.  A  prayer  for  mercy  followed;  then 
came  an  answering  voice,  speaking  peace  and  pardon  ;  a  new 
power  streamed  through  every  avenue  of  his  soul ;  a  new  light 
was  cast  upon  his  pathway ;  trust,  and  calm,  and  joy  were  his. 
His  friend  Nicholas  tells  him  he  is  now  first  truly  converted ; 
now  is  he  truly  enlightened  ;  now  can  he  begin  to  preach  and 
instruct  the  people,  since  he  himself  has  been  instructed  by  the 
Holy  Ghost.  Now  will  a  hundred-fold  more  good  be  done  by 
every  single  sermon,  since  the  truth,  before  theoretically  cor- 
rect, will  flow  through  pure  channels,  and  be  listened  to  a 
hundred-fold  more  gladly  by  the  people. 

We  have  dwelt  upon  this  event  thus  long  because  it  was  a 
great  epoch  in  the  life  of  Tauler.  To  this  visit  of  Nicholas 
may,  indeed,  partially  be  attributed  the  rescue  of  Tauler  from 
the  vortex  of  speculation,  and  his  salvation  from  the  gross 
excesses  into  which  many  of  the  mystical  thinkers  of  his  own 
and  subsequent  times  so  unhappily  plunged. 

After  a  disgraceful  failure  in  an  attempt  to  preach,  and  a 
still  further  discipline  of  soul,  the  man  comes  forth  clad  in  the 
power  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  His  first  sermon  after  his  conver- 
sion (from  Matt,  xxv,  6)  is  no  less  remarkable  for  the  truths  it 
enunciated  than  the  results  that  followed  it.  The  subject  of 
the  discourse  is  a  "  community  of  suffering  with  Christ,  and  a 
perfect  oneness  of  will  with  the  will  of  Christ."  "  God," 
says  he,  "will  suffer  his  Church  to  remain  in  the  furnace  of 
affliction  until  all  sin  is  purged  away.  Then  will  God  unite 
tins  Bride  to  the  Bridegroom  in  everlasting  bonds,  and  the 
Holy  Spirit  will  so  fill  the  Bride  with  love  that  she  will  for- 
get and  lose  herself  in  the  will  of  the  Bridegroom."  During 
the  progress  of  the  discourse  a  man  cries  out,  "  It  is  true  !  It 
is  true  I  "  and  falls  down  as  dead.  Numbers  are  slain  by  the 
power  of  the    truth,  a  dozen   lying  like  dead  men  upon  the 


ISoDj  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  53 

floor  of  tbe  church,  or  having  been  borne  away  by  their 
friends.  He  is  besought  to  discontinue  his  sermon  lest  the 
ixople  die.  .The  reader  of  this  history  is  reminded  of  Wesley 
alter  Ids  instructions  from  the  Moravians ;  of  Chalmers,  when 
his  congregation  was  impressed  with  the  vast  change  that  had 
passed  over  the  man  in  his  conversion  ;  and  of  those  marvelous 
j na infestations  of  power  that  accompanied  the  utterances  of 
many  of  the  early  Methodist  itinerants. 

Still  Tauler  remained  true  to  the  Church.  The  Waldenses, 
with  whom  he  had  much  intercourse  through  Nicholas  von 
Basel  and  others,  outwardly  did  the  same,  in  order  to  save 
themselves  from  persecution.  It  would  not,  perhaps,  be  justifi- 
able to  conclude  that  Tauler  actually  belonged  to  this  sect,  yet 
certain  it  is,  however,  that  they  exerted  upon  him  a  most 
marked  influence.  It  is  not  a  little  remarkable,  that  in  this 
way  the  Waldenses  themselves  found  opportunity  to  work  so 
powerfully  upon  the  most  noted  doctors  of  the  Church,  espe- 
i sally  the  Dominicans,  whose  business  it  was  to  combat  heresy.* 

The  stanch  adherence  of  the  citizens  of  Strasburg  to  the 
cuusc  of  Louis  of  Bavaria  had  iuvolved  them  especially  in  the 
consequences  of  the  Bull  of  Excommunication  issued  by  John 
XXII.  in  1324.  By  this  interdict  the  churches  were  closed, 
tliu  clergy  were  forbidden  to  celebrate  masses,  the  dying  were 
denied  the  consolations  of  religion,  and  the  dead  refused  the 
rites  of  Christian  burial.  The  ban  was  continued  by  Clement 
VM  wince  the  stubborn  Strasburgers  would  not  recognize  his 
krorite  Charles  V.,  though  this  prince  visited  their  city  in 
prnon.  To  add  to  the  horrors  that  Strasburg  had  previously 
tattered,  in  134S  there  appeared  in  the  city  the  "  black  death," 
»  pestilence  that  had  already  raged  for  a  whole  year  in  other 
K-ctioiiiJ  of  Germany.  This  terrible  scourge  is  estimated  to 
bare  swept  away  twenty-five  millions  of  the  population  of 
Kurope.f  Strasburg  alone  furnished  sixteen  thousand  vic- 
tims. By  this  plague  untold  woes  were  multiplied  upon  society. 
11>o  ehock  of  mind  during  its  prevalence  was  beyond  all  pre- 
cedent or  belief.  Citizen  fled  from  citizen,  neighbor  from 
i"  igkbor.  At  last  (so  far  had  terror  stifled  all  feeling)  brother 
G  :>ook  brother,  sister  sister,  the  wife  her  husband,  the  parent 

0  Schmidt,  pp.  36,  37. 

\  Hfcker,  "Der  Schwarze  Tod  "  im  14ten  Jahrhundert,"  p.  40. 

Potters  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 4 


54:  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  [January 

his  own  children,   and,  leaving  them  unassisted  and  uncared 
for,  betook  himself  to  his  own  fate.* 

Influenced  by  the  edict,  still  more  by  fear,  the  priests  for- 
sook their  congregations,  leaving  them  to  die  unshrived,  or  to 
fall  victims  to  the  fatal  delusions  that  were  every-where  mul- 
tiplied. The  course  pursued  by  Tauler  in  the  midst  of  these 
scenes  was  firm  and  uniform.  For  many  years  before  his 
interview  with  Nicholas  of  Basel  he  had  boldly  set  at  naught 
the  commands  of  the  Pope,  and  had  continued  his  ministra- 
tions to  the  people.  After  conversion  his  sense  of  the  holy 
duties  of  the  priesthood  were  too  keen  to  allow  of  any  com- 
promise. Associated  with  such  men  as  Thomas  of  Strasburo-, 
and  Ludolph  from  Saxony,  (the  former  General  Prior  of  the 
Dominicans  at  Strasburg,  the  latter  Prior  of  the  Carthusians.) 
he  not  only  persisted  in  preaching  in  his  native  city,  but 
extended  his  labors  into  the  surrounding  country  and  into  the 
neighboring  villages  and  cities.  Not  only  by  the  continuance 
of  their  practical  religious  labors  among  the  people  did  these 
men  disregard  the  edicts  of  excommunication,  but  already,  long 
before  the  appearance  of  the  plague,  in  vigorous  writings  had 
they  boldly  denied  the  right  of  the  Pope  to  refuse  the  benefits 
and  consolations  of  religion  to  a  multitude  of  ignorant  and 
innocent  people  on  account  of  a  personal  quarrel  between  him- 
self and  the  temporal  princes.  They  assumed  the  position 
that  Christ  had  died  for  all  men,  and  that  whosoever  truly 
repented  and  believed  on  him  should  be  saved ;  against  such 
a  one,  though  he  die  excommunicate,  had  even  the  Pope  no 
power  to  close  the  kingdom  of  heaven. f  In  such  an  age  it 
was  not  to  be  hoped  that  such  views  would  pass  unnoticed. 
The  writings  were  seized  and  burned ;  the  writers  were 
expelled  from  the  city.  The  cloisters  over  which  Kudolph 
was  Prior  received  the  refugees.  In  this  retreat  nearly  two 
years  were  passed  in  writing.  At  length,  in  134S,  on  the  occa- 
sion of  the  visit  of  Charles  IV.  to  Strasburg,  they  were  sum- 
moned before  that  ruler  to  give  an  account  of  the  doctrines  for 
which  they  had  been  expelled.  It  is  probable  that  the  people 
for  whom  Tauler  had  so  tenderly  cared,  and  who  naturally 
cherished  for  him  the  warmest  affection,  were  instrumental  in 
bringing  about  this  interview.  Be  this  as  it  may,  Charles  is 
*  Boccaccio,  as  quoted  by  Hecker,  p.  63.  \  ScJonidt,  p.  52. 


1S09.1  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.        .  55 

constrained  to  declare  his  perfect  agreement  with  the  prin- 
ciples they  had  taught,  and  issued  his  request  that  these  preach- 
ers' should  not  be  further  molested.  Nevertheless,  the  assem- 
bled bishops  condemned  their  teachings  as  heretical,  and  for- 
bade them,  under  pain  of  personal  excommunication,  to  publish 
them  further.*  Thus  shackled  in  his  native  city,  Tauler 
betook  himself  to  Cologne.  Here  the  state  of  morals  was 
scarcely  better  than  in  Strasburg.  Life  in  the  cloister,  among 
both  monks  and  nuns,  was,  if  possible,  even  more  scandalous. 
In  spite  of  all  anathemas  and  martyrdoms,  the  enthusiastic 
Beghards  had  greatly  multiplied  in  Cologne.  This  sect  of 
invstics,  not  always  directed  by  sound  judgment  in  their 
loaders,  scarcely  restrained  by  a  healthy  religious  experience, 
bad,  in  connection  with  many  benevolent  and  truly  Christian 
ftets,  too  often  pushed  the  doctrines  of  their  order  to  their  legit- 
imate results,  and  landed  in  the  wildest  fanaticism.  Against 
the  dangerous  excesses  of  this  sect,  especially,  did  Tauler  direct 
his  efforts.  But  to  his  great  honor  be  it  said,  during  all  the 
unwise  attempts  to  suppress  this  and  other  heretical  parties, 
M  well  as  during  the  horrible  cruelties  visited  upon  the  Jews 
during  the  prevalence  of  the  pestilence,  Tauler,  though  a 
Dominican,  from  which  Order  had  come  the  fiercest  inquisi- 
tors and  the  most  heartless  persecutors,  had  never  by  word  or 
deed  been  implicated  in  these  wrongs.  His  natural  mildness 
of  character— probably  also  his  close  connection  with  "  The 
rrienda  of  God  " — had  taught  him  other  and  more  liberal  prin- 
ciple*. Thus,  in  this  age  of  darkness  do  we  find,  in  the  sug- 
gestions of  this  clear  thinker,  this  devoted  Christian,  germs  of 
that  doctrino  of  "liberty  of  conscience"  which  only  a  later 
and  more  genial  period  could  unfold  and  mature.  Tauler 
Could  distinguish  between  strenuously  opposing  a  principle 
and  persecuting  a  sect. 

Owing  to  lack  of  records  a  partial  obscurity  rests  upon  the 
few  last  years  of  Tauler's  history.  In  1361  we  again  find  him 
in  his  native  city,  being  slowly  brought  down  to  death  by  a 
painfully  lingering  disease  of  twenty  weeks'  continuance. 
during  this  sickness  once  more  met  the  man  and  the  master. 
Nicholas  of  Basle  obeyed  Tauler's  summons,  and  hastened  to 
nil  sick-bed.     To  him  who  had  been  chiefly  instrumental  in 

*  Schmidt,  p.  58. 


56  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

leading  him  to  a  higher  life,  Tauler  now  commits  those 
writings  which  he  wishes  the  world  to  see,  yet  it  is  done  with 
the  injunction  of  strictly  withholding  his  own  name.  The 
motive  is  expressed  in  his  own  words :  "  You  know  well  that 
the  life,  the  words,  and  the  works  which  God  has  spoken 
and  wrought  through  me,  a  poor,  unworthy,  sinful  man,  are 
not  mine,  but  those  of  the  Almighty  God,  whose  they  will 
ever  be." 

He  died  June  16,  1361,  and  was  buried  in  his  cloister  at 
Strasburg,  being  followed  to  his  grave  with  true  sorrow  by 
multitudes  of  his  own  Order,  and  lamented  by  tens  of  thou- 
sands of  the  people  to  whom  he  had  been  so  true  a  friend,  so 
faithful  a  spiritual  adviser. 

It  is  now  time  to  turn  from  the  man  to  a  more  careful  study 
of  his  teachings.*  The  limits  of  this  article  will  confine  us  to 
a  brief  examination  of  the  following  topics : 

I.  His  Theology — including  the  doctrine  of  God,  the  Trinity, 
and  the  creation. 

II.  His  Anthropology — including  the  nature  of  man  and 
*the  doctrine  of  sin. 

III.  His  Soteriology — or  the  mutual  relation  of  God  and 
man  in  the  work  of  salvation. 

IV.  His  Ethical  System. 

We  have  before  said  that  Tauler  had  been  largely  influenced 
by  the  Platonic  views  of  Augustine  and  the  Pseudo-Dionysius, 
modified  by  the  ascetic  notions  of  St.  Bernard.  It  was,  how- 
ever, his  teacher,  Master  Eckhart,  that  had  exerted  upon  him 
the  deepest  immediate  influence.  This  earnest,  vigorous 
thinker,  though  deriving  the  substance  of  his  system  from  ear- 
lier writers — especially  Augustine,  the  Pseudo-Dionysius,  and 
Thomas  Aquinas — had,  nevertheless,  by  his  daring  originality 
infused  into  these  doctrines  a  new  spirit,  influencing  the  thought 
of  his  contemporaries,  and  laying  the  foundation  for  much  of 
the  bold  speculation  of  the  future.  In  judging  of  Eckhart's 
and  Tauler's  systems,  however,  we  must  not  forget  that  they 
labored  more  as  promulgators  of  Christian  truth  than  as  mere 
servants  of  the  Church  ;  that  they  regarded  the  Christian  people 
more  than  the  schools  /  that  in  their  scientific  discussions  they 

*Dr.  Carl  Schmidt — "Johannes  Taulor  von  Strasburg"  part  iii — has  given  a 
fair  summary  of  Tauler's  System.     To  this  are  we  much  iudobted. 


]s.»*»<0  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  57 

bad  respect  chiefly  to  their  adaptation  to  awaken  and  quicken 
the  tuornl  consciousness.  \ 

I.  a.  Tauler,  in  common  with  his  masters,  makes  the  idea  of 
Substance  the  point  of  departure  in  his  entire  theological  and 
rjluVal  system.  Substance  is  that  from  which  all  names, 
jY.rni*,  modes,  and  relations  have  been  abstracted.  It  is  the 
ahi-tracted  predicate,  the  uncreated,  simple,  modeless  unity, 
which  no  created  intelligence,  whether  man  or  angel,  can  com- 
j.rvhend.  There  is  but  one  Substance,  or  Essence,  and  this  is 
God.  lie  is  the  purest  Substance,  in  which  all  manifoldness 
unites,  all  distinction  is  lost.  He  is,  therefore,  above  all  form 
..f  expression,  above  all  names,  (since  names  only  express  God's 
hnmunly-conceived  relations;)  he  is  all  that  which  man  cannot 
represent  in  conception,  in  word,  or  in  picture  ;  he  is,  in  one 
*vrd,  the  pnre,  uncreated,  Nothing.  God,  so  far  as  expression 
i#  concerned,  is  a  Nothing — a  ISTot-God,  a  ISTot-Spirit,  a  Not-Per- 
*>nality,  a  Not-Image — and  yet,  as  the  "Negation  of  all  nega- 
tions," he  is  at  once  the  illimitable  Self-Existence,  the  Possi- 
bility, in  which  the  All  becomes  not  One,  but  absolute  Oneness. 
Tauler  calls  him  the  "  Divine  Darkness,"  which  is  at  the  same 
Uv.n)  the  "Essential  Light." 

I:  While  Tauler  represents  the  Trinity  as  a  profound  mystery  ^ 
to  be  received  by  faith  alone,  he  is,  nevertheless,  often  found 
attempting  to  explain  the  relations  of  the  Persons  of  the  God- 

The  Godhead,  as  such,  is  inactive,  is  unrevealed.  But  he 
will  Dot  and  cannot  so  remain  ;  it  is  in  his  nature  to  reveal 
himself,  to  communicate  himself,  to  work.  But  this  work  is 
r*t>u»jii^  more  than  a  begetting,  a  generation;  and  in  so  far  as 
ha  that  vrork?,  is  he  called  the  Father.  The  Father,  then, 
return*  into  himself,  and  with  his  understanding  apprehends 
and  recognizes  himself.  This  apprehension  he  expresses  with 
»  word  ;  this  Word,  this  Logos,  is  the  Son  ;  and  this  utterance, 
this  expre^ion  of  himself,  constitutes  the  eternal  begetting  of 
the  Sou.  In  the  Sou  the  Father  recognizes  his  own  likeness  ; 
»»  this  [mage  he  loves  himself.  So  also  the  Son  loves  the 
lather,  in  whom  he  discovers  his  own  image;  and  this  mu- 
UiaJ  Delight  which  each  finds  in  the  other,  this  reciprocal  Love, 
i*  the  Holy  Ghost,  which  proceeds  from  the  Father  and  the  Son. 

Bee,  among  other*,  liis  second  sermon  on  Trinity,  sermon  eta  Christmas. 


58  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

The  Father,  then,  is  the  active,  effective  Omnipotent ;  the  Son 
is  the  Omniscience  or  the  Eternal  Wisdom ;  the  Holy  Spirit  is 
the  Eternal  Love. 

Though  Tauler  sees  in  this  view  a  difference  of  Persons  in  a 
unity  of  Nature  or  Substance,  yet  these  personalities  seem  really 
to  indicate  different  relations  or  modes  of  the  Godhead,  rather 
than  difference  of  Person  in  the  true,  orthodox  sense. 

c.  Tauler  again  and  again  insists  that  the  world  was  made 
by  God ;  that  God  is  absolutely  independent  of  all  creatures ; 
that  these  are  only  a  semblance,  an  accident,  a  non-substance. 
Such  is  his  characterization  of  these  created  things  in  opposition 
to  the  one,  indivisible,  real  Essence. 

Expressions  in  his  writings  in  regard  to  the  creation  and  the 
nature  of  the  created  seem  perfectly  to  agree  with  the  ideas  of 
God  before  enunciated.  The  created  can  exist  only  in  so  far 
as  it  is  in  God  and  God  is  in  it,  and  works  in  it.  Creatures, 
therefore,  have  good  in  themselves,  but  are  nothing ;  what  of 
good  is  in  them  is  God  ;  and  so  is  God  in  all  things,  and  yet 
at  the  same  time,  highly  exalted  above  all.  What,  therefore, 
in  the  creature  is  not  good,  what  is  finite,  created,  (that  is,  what 
constitutes  it  a  creature,)  is  absolutely  nothing,  has  no  reality  ; 
so  that  in  the  last  instance  God  alone  remains :  all  out  of  him 
vanishes.* 

II.  a.  The  nature  of  man  is  twofold,  an  inner  and  an  outer 
man,  soul  and  body.  This  nature  is  a  sort  of  mean  between 
two  extremes,  time  and  eternity.  The  inner  man  pertains  to 
eternity  and  aspires  Godward ;  the  outer  man  belongs  to  time 
and  tends  toward  the  finite.  The  soul,  the  inner  man,  has 
originated  in  the  very  essence  and  ground  of  the  Godhead  ;  it 
was  eternally  in  God  in  its  uncreatedness,  a  real  substance  with 
him.  It  was,  and  is,  everlastingly  with  God,  not  as  an  idea, 
hut  actually  and  truly,  in  just  so  far  as  it  is  spirit.  Therefore 
it  is  that  Tauler  regards  the  soul  just  as  incapable  of  definition, 
just  as  destitute  of  modes,  as  Gud  himself;  here,  also,  names 
express  relations,  not  the  reality.  Yet  Tauler,  in  common  with 
others,  must  use  a  term  to  express  this  essence  of  the  soul.  He 
calls  it  the  "  inmost  spark,"  etc.  Then,  in  common  with  Au- 
gustine and  others,  regarding  this  "center  of  the  soul"  as  an 
image  of  the  Trinity,  manifesting  itself  in  the  threefold  manner 
*  Schmidt,  page  93. 


1SC9J  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  59 

of  the  memory,  which  connects  with  hope ;  the  understanding 
n*>ociated  with  faith ;  and  the  free-will,  whose  final  goal  is  love 
lie,  with  others  who  build  upon  Plotinus,*  places  over  all  the 
44  gynteresis  "  the  faculty  or  power  of  immediate  knowledge  and 
reception  of  God. 

b.  His  doctrine  of  sin  is  an  immediate  sequence  of  his  an thro- 
pology.  We  find  his  opinions  most  freely  and  fully  stated  in 
his  "  Imitation,"  etc.  The  possibility  of  sin  Tauler  finds  in  the 
duality  of  man's  nature ;  the  cause  of  sin  in  man's  free  will ; 
the  essence  of  sin  itself  in  forsaking  God  and  turning  to  created 
things  in  order  to  seek  in  them  satisfaction  for  self-love  and  sen- 
suous desires.  Or,  to  adhere  to  his  own  language,  "  Sin  is  even 
this,  that  man  forgets  the  nothing  which  he  is  in  God,  and  will 
ho  something  in  himself,  will  endow  himself  with  qualities.  In 
the  first  man  the  two  parts  of  the  nature  were  in  harmony,  the 
lower  was  subject  to  the  higher,  and  hence  the  goal  of  the 
resultant  action  was  God  alone.  But  by  the  power  of  free 
choice  man  turned  toward  the  outer,  the  sensuous,  and  fell, 
Miice  the  original  harmony  of  his  nature  was  thereby  destroyed. 
Thus  through  Adam's  fall  is  original  righteousness  lost ;  there- 
utter  was  the  race  filled  with  evil  inclinations  and  tendencies. 
But  it  has  not  been  radically  changed;  is  not  essentially  ra- 
ined." His  view  of  the  nature  of  man  would  not  permit  him  to 
regard  the  soul,  in  its  essence,  as  contaminated  by  the  fall ;  it 
must  ever  remain,  in  its  inmost  substance,  as  pure  as  at  the 
beginning.  ^  Adam  has  simply  transmitted  to  the  race  an  incli- 
nation to  sin  ;  but  as  with  Adam  so  with  every  man,  real  sin 
c^m*  not  from  necessity  but  from  free  choice.  Just  herein 
connate  the  difference  between  inherited  and  actual  sin— the 
former  h  only  an  inclination,  the  latter  is  a  deliberate  choice. 
}  it,  »uioe  through  Adam's  transgression  the  inclination  to  evil 
U  transmitted  to  the  entire  race,  all  are  in  so  far  sinners,  and 
Would  be  lost  but  for  the  gracious  aid  that  God  vouchsafes. 

IIL  Ihc  return  of  man  from  this  severance,  from  this  mani- 
ioldnesa,  to  union,  to  oneness,  to  peace,  and  to  God,  is  the 
great  burden  of  Taulcr's  preaching  and  writing.  He  says,  "  The 
Whole  creation  of  God  lias  no  other  object  or  end  than  to  call 
Uek  the  boul  of  man  to  hi.  Maker,  to  heal  the  breach  that  sin 
IIM  made."     Hence  he  still  finds  in  all  souls  a  longing  after 

*  to  fvtftS  olov  kLvtoov.    Enuoad,  VI,  9,  10. 


60  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  Uanrr;:rr, 

God.     The  heathen  world  is  a  standing  proof  of  this.     But  so 
long  as  the  race  is  unassisted,  and  seeks  after  God  by  its  own 
nnaided  powers,  so  long  will  it  fail  to  find  him.     Man  may, 
and  does,  while  unassisted,  come  to  the  knowledge  that  God  is\ 
(the  very  feeling  after  him  implies  this,)  but  he  must  ever  fail 
to  discover  what  he  is.     This  will  be  revealed  only  to  the  man 
enlightened  by  grace.     Tauler  never  despises  the  reason ;  in- 
deed, no  writer  more  exalts  its  powers  and  capabilities;  but  he 
would  turn  it  from  seeking  God  by  its  own  unaided  powers  in 
merely  outward  things  into  the  innermost  spirit  of  the  man, 
where  the  Divine  is  nearer  to  the  soul  than  its  very  self.    Here 
alone  can  God  be  found  in  his  essential  nature.     Since  the  man 
by  his  nnaided  powers  cannot  return  to  God,  God  must  work 
in  him ;  indeed,  all  is  truly  his  work.     This  direct  and  imme- 
diate working  of  God  upon  the  human  soul  Tauler  calls  orace. 
The  man,  it  is  true,  cannot  of  himself  do  any  thing  acceptable ; 
nevertheless  there  belongs  to  him  a  work,  namely,  a  rising  up 
to  meet  God  in  his  approach  to  save  him.     If  the  man  does 
this,  if  his  will  responds  to  God's  invitation,  so  comes  savins 
grace  to  such  a  man.     On  the  part  of  the  sinner  nothing  more 
is  demanded  than  a  readiness  to  receive  God.    Tauler  uniformly 
teaches   that   the   revelation  of  this   saving  grace  is  through 
Christ;  the  made  of  return  to  union  with  God  is  by  imitating 
Christ,  by  following  Him  who  is  the  way,  since  he  is  one  with 
God.     Thus  it  will  be  seen  that  Tauler  is  somewhat  widely  re- 
moved from  the  rigid  Augustinianism  that  for  the  most  part 
ruled  in  his  Order. 

IV.  In  Tauler's  system  ethics  hold  the  first  rank  in  impor- 
tance. His  mysticism  being  by  far  more  practical  than  specu-  ' 
lative,  the  duties  of  man  to  God  and  to  his  fellow  are,  'discoursed 
upon  on  nearly  every  page  of  his  works.  "  By -combinino-  the 
teachings  of  Paul  and  Augustine  with  the  neo-Platonic  ele- 
ments of  the  pseudo-Areopagite,  Albertus  Magnus,  and  Thomas 
Aquinas,  had  Master  Kckhart  already  laid  in  his  doctrine  of 
God  a  deeper  foundation  for  Christian  ethics."*  x . 

Tauler  agrees  with  Eckhart  in  developing  his  entire  ethicaj 

system  from  the  stand-point  of  pure  love.    Only  from  the  nnioh 

of  the  soul   with   God   in  love  can  originate  virtuous  action. 

While  he  divides  virtues  int.;  three  classes,  namely,  1,  Natural, 

*  Ubcrweg,  ••  Geaehichto  dcr  Philosophies  part  ii,  p.  207. 


18G9.3  John  Tauter  and  his  Theology.  61 

as  meekness,  tenderness,  mercy ;  2,  Moral,  as  wisdom,  justice, 
and  emperance ;  3,  Supernatural,  as  faith,  hope,  and  love  ;  the 
foundation  principle  of  his  ethics  is,  nevertheless,  the  unity  of 
all  virtu-e,  that  is,  that  all  virtues  are  only  different  outgrowths 
or  manifestations  of  one  common,  central,  indivisible,  energizing 
principle,  an  unselfish,  holy  love.  Virtuous  action  has  no  ref- 
erence to  ends  to  be  secured.  Happiness,  the  kingdom  of 
heaven,  eternal  life,  are  not  justifiable  ends  of  a  moral  purpose. 
Work  for  the  work's  sake  ;  love  for  the  sake  of  loving  ;  and  if 
there  were  no  heaven,  no  hell,  love  God  for  his  own  sake.  Virtue 
is  a  condition.  Morality  consists  not  in  action,  but  is  a  state 
of  the  soul.  The  work  does  not  sanctify  us,  we  sanctify  the 
work. 

From  principles  such  as  these  can  be  readily  inferred  what 
would  be  his  views  of  a  Christian  life.  Herein,  especially,  ap- 
pears the  grand  superiority  of  Tauler's  system  to  the  fanaticism 
of  some  of  the  mystical  sects  of  his  own  time,  as  well  as  the 
dangerous,  perplexing  casuistry  of  Scholasticism.  To  him  were 
equally  offensive  the  lazy  retirement  of  orders  into  cell  and 
cloister,  the  self-inflicted  torture  of  the  ascetic,  and  the  arrogant 
pretensions  of  the  "  Brethren  of  the  Free  Spirit."  To  each  and 
nil  would  this  sturdy  worker  say :  "  If  you  wish  to  come  into 
union  with  God,  or  if  you  are  already  divine,  (as  you  pretend,) 
prove  it  by  imitating  this  Father  in  scattering  blessings  among 
the  sorrowing,  by  healing  the  broken-hearted,  and  by  instru- 
mentally  bringing  to  life  dead  souls." 

Conclusion. 

^  1.  'While  the  defenders  of  Master  Eckhart,  by  pressing  his 
distinction  between  the  world  of  ideas  and  the  world  of  created 
t&ingst  have  endeavored  to  save  his  system  from  the  charges 
of  Pantheism,  Tauler,  by  declaring  that  all  was  absolutely  in 
(iod  in  essencv,  seems  to  have  left  no  open  door  of  escape.  His 
speculative  views  of  God,  the  creation,  and  the  nature  of  man, 
when  pressed  legitimately  to  their  last  results,  appear  to  land 
us  in  the  blankest  Pantheism. 

2.  But  it  must  be  remembered  that  his  system  was  more 
practical  than  speculative.  By  repeatedly,  asserting  the  real 
creation  of  all  things  by  God — by  his  earnest  appeals  and 
exhortations  to  an  active  religious  life,  by  his  scathing  rebukes 


62  John  Tauler  and  his  Theology.  [January, 

of  the  hypocrisy  and  fanatical  excesses  of  his  times,  and,  most 
of  all,  by  the  deeply-grounded  and  eminently  practical  system 
of  ethics  that  he  developed,  he  largely  prevented  the  evils  that 
might  otherwise  have  flowed  from  his  speculations. 

The  perfect  union  in  his  mysticism  of  the  practical  and  con- 
templative, its  inner  harmony  and  symmetry,  which  raised  a 
front  equally  against  the  speculative  and  practically  antino- 
miau  Freethinking  and  Quietism  of  his  time  ;  in  one  word, 
against  all  that  would  theoretically  or  practically  blot  out  the 
consciousness  of  simple  dependence  on  God,*  gives  to  Tauler's 
system  its  immense  importance,  and  entitles  Tauler  himself 
to  the  first  place  among  the  deep  thinkers  of  his  school. 

3.  He  was  one  of  the  founders  of  a  German  theological  and 
philosophical  language,  a  language  now  developed  into  such 
rich  results.  His  writings  contain  the  seed-thoughts  of  future 
theories  and  systems.  His  zeal  and  earnestness  did  much  to 
keep  alive  the  flame  of  Christian  truth  in  his  own  age.  Great 
and  grievous  errors  he  undoubtedly  made ;  "  but  his  faults 
were  those  of  his  age,  his  virtues  were  his  own."  "  Even  as 
there  is  sculptured  upon  his  tombstone  at  Strasburg  a  figure, 
with  finger  pointing  to  a  lamb,  so  would  he  thereby  signify, 
that  in  all  his  doctrines  he  referred  directly  to  the  Lamb  of 
God  who  taketh  away  the  sin  of  the  world."  f  u  A  heart 
that  has  laid  Christ  at  the  foundation  of  his  hopes  will  find  in 
Tauler  such  a  light  for  improvement,  for  worship,  for  purity, 
for  sanctification  to  God,  for  God's  fear,  for  spiritual  wisdom, 
that  he  will  rejoice  in  the  fruitful  and  precious  results  to  his 
soul."  }  His  stout  and  persistent  protest  against  the  Iiomish 
doctrine  of  works,  against  the  utility  of  asceticism,  and  the 
efficiency  of  the  confessional ;  against  the  mediatorial  charac- 
ter of  any  man,  be  he  Bishop,  Cardinal,  or  Pope  ;  and  against 
the  right  of  the  Pope  to  interfere  in  the  temporal  affairs  of 
government,  made  him  the  efficient  forerunner  of  that  great 
Reformation  that  was  to  follow  two  centuries  later. 

In  any  view,  will  a  study  of  Tauler's  writings  richly  repay 
the  historic  student  who  seeks  the  hidden  springs  and  causes  of 
subsequent  revolutions  in  Church  and  State. 

*  Bohringer,  "  Die  Kirche  Christi  u.  ihre  Zeugon,"  Tol.  ii,  p.  295. 
f  Melanchthon.  X  Joha  Aradi  1G2L 


1SC9.]  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  63 


Art.  IV.— THE  METROPOLIS  OF  THE  PACIFIC. 

The  city  of  San  Francisco  is  situated  on  the  bay  of  the  same 
name,  latitude  37°  41'  north,  and  longitude  122°  30'  west  from 
Greenwich.  The  Golden  Gate  opens  from  the  Pacific  Ocean 
into  the  bay  about  seven  miles  northwest  from  the  center  of 
the  business  front  of  the  city,  which  faces  the  east.  The  city, 
as  it  now  lies,  is  built  on  a  group  of  hills,  the  general  slope  of 
which  is  south  and  east.  The  Gate  is  one  and  one  half  miles  ' 
in  width  at  the  narrowest  point.  There  are  three  small  islands 
in  the  bay,  Angel's,  Alcatraz,  and  Yerba  Buena..  These  islands, 
and  the  bold  bluffs  which  guard  the  entrance  of  the  bay,  afford 
the  completest  natural  means  for  defense. 

The  Bay  of  San  Francisco  was  discovered  in  1769  by  Father 
Junipero  Serra,  a  Franciscan  missionary.  "With  several  com- 
panions Serra  left  San  Diego  for  the  purpose  of  establishing  a 
mission  at  Monterey ;  but  bearing  too  far  eastward,  they  passed 
the  point  of  destination,  and  at  length  the  eye  of  the  good  father 
fell  upon  the  waters  of  a  beautiful  bay.  Until  then  no  mission 
on  the  Pacific  had  been  named  after  the  patron  saint  of  the 
order.  The  visidator,  or  superintendent  of  the  missions,  had 
baid :  "  If  St.  Francis  wishes  a  mission  let  him  show  you  a 
good  port,  and  then  it  will  bear  his  name."  On  the  discovery 
of  this  magnificent  harbor  Serra  said,  "  This,  then,  is  the  port 
to  which  the  visidator  referred,  and  to  which  the  saint  has  led 
as,  blessed  be  his  name."  The  mission  was  planted  in  1776, 
6<>me  twojniles  from  the  embarcedaro,  or  landing,  on  a  beauti- 
ful *lope"f  land  watered  by  several  streams,  and  commauding 
a  fine  view  of  the  bay  and  the  range  of  hills  beyond.  The  old 
church,  built  of  adobe  or  unburned  brick,  is  still  standing,  and 
now,  as  for  nearly  one  hundred  years,  its  bells  call  to  matins 
ami  vespers. 

It  is  6ome  eight  miles  from  the  ocean  beach  to  the  shore  of 
the  bay  on  which  the  city  fronts.  The  waters  of  the  bay  ex 
tend  some  forty  miles  south  from  the  city,  making  a  peninsula 
between  it  and  the  ocean  ranging  from  eight  to  sixteen  miles 
in  breadth.  This  southern  portion  of  the  bay  receives  several 
streams,  which  drain  a  large  area  of  country,  mountains  and 
valleys,  the  principal  of  which  is  the  Gaudaloupe.      Twenty 


"64  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  [January, 

miles  north  of  the  city  San  Francisco  connects  with  San  Pablo 
Bay,  and  this,  eight  miles  further  north,  with  the  Bay  of  Sui- 
eun.  Together  these  bays  make  a  splendid  harbor,  measuring 
6ome  eight  miles  in  length  by  an  average  of  ten  wide,  com- 
pletely land-locked,  except  the  narrow  entrance  from  the  ocean, 
and  affording  anchorage  and  roadstead  for  the  merchant  and 
war  marine  of  the  world.  The  Bay  of  Suisun  receives  the 
waters  of  the  San  Joaquin  and  Sacramento  Rivers  and  their 
tributaries.  These  drain  a  district  of  country  eight  hundred 
by  one  hundred  miles  in  extent — rugged,  towering  mountains, 
rich  foothills,  and  fruitful  valleys.  These  rivers  are  navigable 
for  steamers  of  light  draught  an  aggregate  of  some  seven  hun- 
dred miles.  Besides  these  there  are  innumerable  smaller 
streams  and  sloughs,  into  which  vessels  pass  bearing  passengers 
and  merchandise,  and  return  with  the  produce  of  the  lands. 
The  carrying  trade  of  many  millions  of  people  may  be  done  on 
these  bays  and  rivers. 

Our  coast- line  now  extends  to  the  Arctic  Sea,  with  the  slight 
exception  of  British  Columbia,  which  will  soon  be  ours  by  pur- 
chase or  annexation,  and  which  is  commercially  dependent 
upon  San  Francisco  in  any  event — a  distance  of  nearly  two 
thousand  miles.  There  are  several  harbors  on  this  coast,  but 
none  of  considerable  capacity  except  Puget  Sound ;  and  in  no 
possible  contingency  can  these  serve  any  other  purpose  than  to 
augment  the  commercial  importance  of  San  Francisco.  On 
the  southern  coast  are  Monterey,  Santa  Barbara,  San  Pedro, 
San  Diego,  Guymas,  Mazatlan,  Manzanillo,  Acapulco,  Fonseca, 
San  Juan  del  Sur,  and  Panama  harbors,  measuring  a  coast-line 
of  three  thousand  miles  ;  ports  of  more  or  less  capacity,  connect- 
ing with  a  country  of  vast  extent  and  fabulous  wealth,  whose 
immense  products  will  yet  be  poured  into  the  lap  of  the  queen 
Bitting  at  the  Golden  Gate. 

Westward,  twelve  days  by  steam  connects  us  with  the  Ha- 
waiian Islands,  at  Honolulu ;  eight  more  with  the  Empire  of 
Japan,  at  Yokohama ;  and  six  more  with  the  Celestial  Empire, 
at  Hong  Kong;  and  so  steam  communication  with  Australia, 
India,  and  Europe  is  completed,  and  the  circuit  of  tho  globe  is 
made  in  eighty  days  sailing  time.  All  these  lines  of  communi- 
cation are  now  open,  and  magnificent  steamships,  sustained  by 
adequate  subsidies,  and  freighted  with  men  and  merchandise, 


1 1 369J  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  65 

are  making  this  circuit,  thus  marking  an  epoch  in  the  commer- 
cial history  of  the  world.  All  the  year  round  the  friendly 
••  trades,"  six  months  from  the  northwest,  and  six  from  the  south- 
west, fill  the  sails  of  splendid  clippers  pointing  to  the  Golden 
Gate  as  the  passage  to  the  city  whose  opulent  mart  will  soon 
dictate  the  exchange  of  all  nations. 

Our  climate,  removed  as  we  are  from  extremes  of  heat  and 
cvld,  is  bracing,  balmy,  healthful.  Ordinary  sanitary  police, 
with  the  breeze  that  brings  health  every  day  from  the  waters 
of  the  Pacific,  will  guarantee  our  population  against  the  inva- 
sion and  ravages  of  epidemic  diseases.  Substantially,  this  boon 
is  the  heritage  of  all  the  dwellers  on  the  Pacific  slope,  an,d  it 
will  yet  tempt  multitudes  here  from  other  lands. 

The  territory  depending  upon  and  contributing  to  the  growth 
of  San  Francisco  as  its  chief  commercial  center  is  immense, 
within  our  own  national  domain  measuring,  in  round  numbers, 
scarcely  less  than  two  million  square  miles — more  than  all  the 
Atlantic,  Middle,  and  Western  States,  and  capable  of  support- 
ing a  population  of  five  hundred  millions.  "Western  Mexico, 
and  Central  and  South  America,  are  already  ours;  Polynesia, 
Australia,  Japan,  China,  so  soon  as  the  continental  railroad  is 
completed,  will  concentrate  their  trade  here.  English,  French, 
and  other  European  merchants  doing  business  with  the  East 
will  find  it  for  then-  interest  to  transact  it  through  San  Fran- 
cisco. The  most  opulent  cities  of  history  have  drawn  their 
wealth  from  the  Orient. 

The  resources  and  productive  capabilities  of  our  own  and 
Other  countries  bordering  on  the  Pacific  are  beyond  all  ability 
to  estimate.  The  precious  metals,  deposits  of  gold  and  veins 
of  silver,  in  the  ranges  of  mountains  extending  from  Panama  to 
the  Arctic  Ocean,  will  not  be  exhausted  in  ages,  though  myriad 
hands,  with  aid  of  science  and  art,  are  employed  in  extracting 
them.  Cinnebar,  copper,  tin,  are  found  in  abundance.  Coal 
veins  are  opened  in  British  Columbia,  Washington  Territory, 
and  California  already,  and  scientific  tests  warrant  the  belief 
that  the  supply  will  be  found  adequate  to  the  demands  of  our 
rapidly-increasing  population.  The  forests  of  the  Sierra  and 
Coast  Ranges  of  Mountains,  particularly  in  Northern  California, 
Oregon,  and  Washington  Territory,  are  vast,  and  will  become 
a  source   of  industry  and  wealth,  more  particularly  as  they 


66  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  [January, 

abound  in  varieties  of  timber  suitable  for  ship-building.  Meas- 
ures are  now  under  consideration  that  promise  to  transfer  the 
building  of  our  merchant  marine  from  the  North  Atlantic  to 
the  North  Pacific.  The  furs  of  the  North  Pacific  coast  are 
renowned  the  world  over,  and  the  supply  will  increase  with 
the  growing  demand.  The  North  Sea  and  the  rivers  adjacent 
abound  with  the  best  varieties  of  fish  known  to  the  markets  of 
the  world.  Our  whalers  return  from  the  Otchkotch  every  sea- 
son freighted  with  treasures  drawn  from  her  waters.  All  fruits 
known  in  tropical  and  semi-tropical  regions  are  produced,  in 
finest  qualities,  in  our  valleys  and  on  our  hill-sides,  and  every 
month  in  the  year  are  found  in  our  market,  fresh  from  the 
orchard  and  the  garden.  California  had  in  1S66  fifteen  million 
four  hundred  thousand  and  seventy-seven  vines  in  vineyard, 
and  probably  that  number  has  been  more  than  doubled  since. 
All  the  solid  grains,  as  corn,  wheat,  barley,  oats,  with  proper 
culture  are  grown  in  great  abundance,  the  average  yield  per 
acre  being  more  than  double  that  of  the  best  grain-producing 
sections  of  the  Atlantic.  Silk,  cotton,  hemp,  flax,  are  already 
among  the  staples  of  this  coast.  Granted  an  adequate  popula- 
tion, intelligent,  enterprising,  led  by  men  of  broad  views  and 
generous  plans,  and  tke-«developed  resources  of  the  Pacific  slope 
will  amaze  the  world.  This  population,  these  men,  are  here 
and  are  coining.  Two  lines  of  steamships  are  running  be- 
tween San  Francisco  and  New  York,  connecting  with  other 
lines  to  Europe.  The  continental  railroad  approaches  comple- 
tion ;  the  north  Pacific  railroad,  from  St.  Paul's,  Minnesota, 
to  Puget  Sound,  and  a  southern  line  from  San  Francisco  to 
Galveston,  Texas,  or  some  more  eligible  terminus,  will  soon  be 
constructed,  with  numerous  branches  and  cross  lines ;  and  all 
these  lines  of  communication  will  so  facilitate  and  cheapen 
travel  and  the  cost  of  transportation  as  to  secure  the  advent 
of  multitudes  from  other  states  and  other  lands  to  our  golden 
Bhore,  to  share  our  opportunities  and  participate  in  the  grandeur 
of  our  destiny.  Cities  and  towns  will  spring  up  over  all  this 
side  of  the  continent;  the  hand  of  intelligent  industry  will  be 
laid  upon  our  productive  soil;  arts  and  manufactures  will 
flourish,  and  all  will  contribute  to  the  wealth  and  magnificence 
of  the  commercial  metropolis. 

The  first  tenement  was  erected  in  Yerba  Buena,  now  San 


1S69.1  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  67 

Francisco,  in  1835 ;  and  up  to  1846  not  more  than  twenty  or 
ihirtv  houses  were  built  In  March,  1848,  the  treaty  ceding 
California  to  the  United  States  was  ratified  in  Washington, 
and  in  the  following  May  it  was  approved  by  the  Mexican 
Congress.  In  1848,  when  the  rush  of  incoming  population 
commenced,  there  were  some  two  hundred  dwellings  of  all  de- 
scriptions, finished  and  unfinished,  in  the  city,  and  a  population 
of  four  hundred  and  fifty  souls.  From  that  period  the  growth 
of  the  city  has  been  rapid ;  and  though  twice  nearly  destroyed 
bv  tire,  and  suffering  severely  from  vicious  government  for  a 
time,  and  passing  through  serious  commercial  revulsions,  it  has 
advanced  in  wealth. and  population  until  it  has  about  one  hun- 
dred and  thirty  thousand  inhabitants,  and  is  only  a  little  less 
than  the  second  city  on  the  continent  in  commercial  impor- 
tance ;  and1  this  astonishing  expansion  is  distinguished  by  evi- 
dences of  healthful  vigor,  indicating  that  a  future  of  increasing 
marvel  is  before  it. 

The  annual  export  of  gold  has  averaged  fifty  million  dollars, 
or  nine  hundred  and  fifty  millions  in  nineteen  years;  and  a 
discriminating  estimate  suggests  that  as  much  more  has  been 
taken  away  by  private  hands  and  consumed  in  permanent 
improvements  among  us.  Two  hundred  and  twenty-two 
•vessels  have  been  employed  in  exporting  wheat  from  this  city 
during  the  past  year,  including  one  hundred  and  sixty  full 
cargoes  to  Europe,  the  estimated  value  of  which  is  sixteen 
million  dollars;  and  yet  it  is  ascertained,  upon  carefully  pre- 
pared data,  that  riot  more  than  three  per  cent,  of  the  agricul- 
tural land  of  California  is  under  cultivation.  People  in  the 
Atlantic  States  and  in  Europe  who  have  supposed  that  ours 
*"  only  a  mineral  producing  region,  and  that  the  mines 
would  soon  be  exhausted,  can  appreciate  the  fact  that  our 
land  will  average  thirty  bushels  of  wheat  to  the  acre,  and  that 
ita  quality  is  6uch  as  to  command  the  highest  price  in  every 
market. 

Of  wool,  the  produce  of  two  million  one  hundred  and  sixty- 
six  thousand  three  hundred  sheep  the  past  year  was  twelve 
million  pounds.  These  are  given  as  indices  of  the  character 
and  amount  of  our  exports,  and  as  intimating  what  they  must 
be  in  the  future. 

There  are  sixty  periodicals  published  in  the  city,  ten  of 


68  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  [January, 

which  are  religious.  The  public  schools  of  San  Francisco  are 
her  honor  and  pride.  '  There  are  forty-one  buildings  belonging 
to  the  department,  which  have  cost  $458,378.  The  teachers 
were  paid  the  last  year  $209,136  92.  The  whole  cost  of  the 
department  for  the  same  period  was  $320,058  88.  The 
number  of  pupils  enrolled  is  thirteen  thousand  eight  hundred 
and  thirty-two ;  number  in  the  city  under  fifteen  years  of  age, 
twenty  thousand  four  hundred  and  thirty-two.  Personal  and 
denominational  enterprise  and  munificence  have  established 
several  schools  of  high  grade,  some  of  which  are  handsomely 
tndowe3.  The  educational  advantages  of  the  city  are 
excellent. 

There  are  ten  Roman  Catholic  churches  in  San  Francisco. 
Besides  these,  the  Papists  have  two  colleges,  provided  with 
substantial  and  commodious  buildings,  and  well  endowed ; 
one  orphan  asylum,  a  convent,  a  Magdalen  asylum,  and  other 
institutions,  giving  Popery  a  strong  central  position  among 
the  agencies  that  are  shaping  the  sentiments  of  the  people, 
and  determining  the  future  of  the  city.  Protestantism,  too,  is 
powerful  here.  In  the  city  there  are  five  Baptist  churches, 
(one  colored,)  five  Congregational,  six  Protestant  Episcopa- 
lian, twelve  Methodist,  (including  two  German,  two  colored, 
one  Southern,  and  one  Wesleyan,)  seven  Presbyterian,  one 
Swedenborgian,  one  Unitarian,  four  German  Lutheran,  one 
Swedish,  >and  one  Campbellite,  making  an  aggregate  of 
forty-three  Protestant  congregations,  besides  several  small 
congregations  not  in  the  above  enumeration.  The  Hebrews 
have  four  congregations ;  two  of  their  houses  of  worship  being 
among  the  most  costly  and  commodious  in  the  city.  Benevolent 
and  reformatory  associations  are  numerous,  and  many  of  them 
are  operating  effectively.  Among  the  oldest  and  most  cher- 
ished charities  of  the  city  aro  the  Ladies'  Protection  and 
Relief  Society,  and  the  Protestant  Orphan  Asylum.  Mutual 
protection  and  relief  associations  flourish  here  as  they  do  not  in 
older  communities.  Men  came  here  as  adventurers  ;  they  were 
strangers  to  each  other ;  and  it  became  necessary  to  establish 
relations  of  mutual  confidence  for  the  common  good,  and 
for  the  protection  of  persons  and  property.  Hence  these 
associations. 

With  such  natural  advantages,  6uch  resources,  and  such  a 


1860.1  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  69 

genesis,  ordinary  sagacity  will  anticipate  the  future  of  the 
Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  It  was  not  until  two  hundred  and 
ten  years  after  its  settlement  that  New  York  took  rank  as  the 
first  city  of  the  continent ;  and  its  growth  and  opulence  com- 
menced with  the  opening  of  the  Erie  Canal,  which  made  New 
York  merchants  the  factors  of  the  Atlantic  sea-board.  Ninety- 
one  years  from  the  date  of  the  commencement  of  that  city, 
long  after  it  had  ceased  to  be  a  Dutch  colony,  its  population 
was  but  seven  thousand  souls.  In  nineteen  years  San  Fran- 
cisco has  acquired  a  population  of  one  hundred  and  thirty 
thousand.  In  1800  New  York  contained  only  sixty  thousand 
four  hundred  and  eighty  people ;  and  in  1820  its  population 
was  not  as  large  as  that  of  San  Francisco  to-day.  The  home 
territory  on  which  its  growth  depends  is  much  larger;  the 
climate  of  this  territory  is  immeasurably  more  healthful  and 
delightful ;  its  products  are  more  diversified  and  valuable ;  and 
in  natural  wealth  it  is  incomparably  richer  than  its  great 
Atlantic  rival.  The  opening  of  the  Erie  Canal  and  the  subse- 
quent construction  of  railroads,  webbing  the  East  and  the 
North,  and  stretching  away  into  the  distant  West  and  North- 
west, indicate  the  historic  era  of  the  rapid  growth  of  New  York. 
Add  multiplied  and  speedy  modes  of  ocean  communication,  and 
the  data  on  which  that  growth  has  been  maintained  are  given. 

In  1840  Chicago  contained  about  four  thousand  eight 
hundred  inhabitants.  The  conditions  indicated  in  respect  of 
New  York  are  largely  applicable  to  that  city.  Previous  to 
the  building  of  railroads,  that  lie  like  net-work  over  all  the 
Northwest,  it  was  only  a  trading-post  among  the  wigwams  of 
the  Indians.  The  era  of  railroad  building  on  the  Pacific  slope 
in  now  fairly  opened.  The  Central  Pacific,  spanning  the  con- 
tinent, and  putting  us  in  connection  with  the  commercial 
metropolis  of  the  Atlantic  in  six  days'  time,  will  be  completed 
In  less  than  two  years ;  the  lines  on  the  north  and  south  sur- 
veys will  be  constructed  in  ten  years ;  in  the  mean  time  a  line 
«"»U  thread  the  mountain  valleys  and  passes  to  the  chief  com- 
mercial city  of  Oregon,  and  forks  and  branches  will  connect 
th<*e  grand  trunks  with  San  Pedro,  San  Diego,  Guy  mas,  and 
oilier  ports  on  the  lower  coast,  and  so  open  to  settlement  and 
enterprise  our  vast  national  domain  from  the  Atlantic  to  the 
Pacific,  and  from  the  two  oceans  to  the  Queen's  dominions  and 

K«w  Semes,  Vol.  XXI.— 5 


7(X  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  [January, 

the  Arctic  Sea  on  the  North ;  and  all  must  contribute  directly 
and  certainly  to  the  growth  and  opulence  of  San  Francisco. 
Besides,  the  multiplied  facilities  of  speedy  and  safe  communi- 
cation with  Polynesia  and  Asia  are  sure  to  swell  the  population 
of  the  coast,  and  hasten  the  development  of  its  various  re- 
sources. In  less  than  forty-seven  years  New  York  increased 
her  population  from  one  hundred  and  twenty  thousand  to 
nearly  nine  hundred  thousand.  This  astonishing  growth  was 
realized  under  the  circumstances  before  named.  New  York 
has  more,  and  more  powerful,  rivals  on  the  Atlantic  sea-board 
than  San  Francisco  has,  or  can  have,  on  the  Pacific.  The 
concentration  of  capital  and  trade  here  is  beyond  peradven- 
ture.  The  soberest  view  of  our  future  is,  that  thirty  years  will 
give  this  city  one  million  inhabitants,  and  the  opposite  shore 
of  the  bay  one  hundred  thousand,  and  that  its  expansion  will 
then  only  have  fairly  commenced ;  while  the  shore  of  the 
beautiful  Pacific,  its  valleys,  foot  hills,  and  mountains,  fanned 
by  the  breezes  and  wet  by  the  dews  that  rise  from  its  bosom, 
will  swarm  with  ten  millions  of  people,  and  ring  with  the 
notes  of  intelligent  industry  and  enterprise.  Solid  blocks  of 
brick  or  granite  will  cover  an  area  of  eight  miles  square  ; 
suburban  towns  will  mark  the  lines  of  the  chief  thoroughfares ; 
and  the  evidences  of  thrift  aud  growth  will  multiply  on  every 
hand.  "  Kome  is  Italy,"  "  Paris  is  France,"  San  Francisco  is 
California  and  the  Pacific  Slope,  and  more ;  for  all  the  Orient 
is  destined  to  yield  her  tribute. 

The  Church  must  fix  her  faith  and  expend  her  liberalities 
here.  Mindful  of  her  mission  to  the  world  ;  occupying  regions 
beyond ;  threading  the  valleys  and  scaling  the  mountains  by 
her  messengers,  and  filling  the  whole  land  with  the  joyful 
sound ;  yet  the  highest  wisdom,  the  best  culture,  the  purest 
devotion,  the  loftiest  heroism,  and  the  most  enlarged  benev- 
olence of  the  Church  are  demanded  in  San  Francisco.  Church 
extension  movements  must  keep  pace  with  the  rapidly  extend- 
ing area  of  the  city.  An  efficient  organization  for  this  purpose 
is  the  demand  of  the  hour.  Sunday-schools  and  mission 
stations  are  to  be  planted.  Sites  for  church  and  6chool 
purposes  are  to  be  secured.  Altar  fires,  lighted  by  the  Church, 
must  blaze  on  every  hill-top  and  encircle  the  city.  Perpetual 
oblations  of  living  sacrifices   must  send  their  incense   to  the 


1*09.1  The  Metropolis  of  the  Pacific.  71 

A\c*.  The  pulpits  of  the  Church  must  ring  with  notes  of  law 
and  Gospel,  sin  and  salvation.  Her  book  and  publishing 
interests  are  to  be  kept  abreast  with  the  wants  of  this  field,  and 
tbo  demands  of  the  times.  Her  educational  interests  must 
liud  development  in  the  founding  of  schools  of  law,  and 
medicine,  and  theology;  for  here  our  great  public  libraries  are 
lacing  gathered  ;  world-renowned  lecturers  will  sojourn  here , 
and  here  are  gathering  throngs  of  peoples  from  every  shore, 
end  destined  to  every  land,  to  be  reached  and  saved  by 
the  young  evangelists  while  in  course  of  training  for  the 
pastoral  office  or  the  mission  field.  If  this  city  is  filled  with 
the  light  and  power  of  Gospel  truth,  the  nations  cannot  long 
tit  in  darkness. 


Art.  V.— THE  NEGRO  IX  ANCIENT  HISTORY.* 

Presuming  that  no  believer  in  the  Bible  will  admit  that  the 
negro  had  his  origin  at  the  head  waters  of  the  Nile,  on  the 
hanks  of  the  Gambia,  or  in  the  neighborhood  of  the  Zaire,  we 
fhonld  like  to  inquire  by  what  chasm  is  he  separated  from 
other  descendants  of  Noah,  who  originated  the  great  works  of 
antiquity,  so  that  with  any  truth  it  can  be  said  that  "  if  all 
that  negroes  of  all  generations  have  ever  done  were  to  be 
obliterated  from  recollection  forever  the  world  would  lose  no 
great  truth,  no  profitable  art,  no  exemplary  form  of  life.  The 
loss  of  all  that  is  African  would  offer  no  memorable  deduction 
from  any  thing  but  the  earth's  black  catalogue  of  crimes."  f 
In  singular  contrast  with  the  disparaging  statements  of  the 
naval  officer,  Volney,  the  great  French  Oriental  traveler  and 
distinguished  linguist,  after  visiting  the  wonders  of  Egypt  and 
Ethiopia,  exclaims,  as  if  in  mournful  indignation,  "  How  are 
wo  astonished  when  we  reflect  that  to  the  race  of  negroes, 
at  present  our  slaves,  and  the  objects  of  our  extreme  contempt, 
we  owe  oui    arts   and   sciences,   and   even   the  very  use  of 

•  This  is,  so  far  as  we  know,  the  first  article  in  any  Quarterly  written  by  a  hand 
claiming  a  pure  Ethiopic  lineage. 
f  Commander  Foote,  "  Africa  and  the  American  Flag,"  p.  207. 


72  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

speech!"  And  we  do  not  see  how,. with  the  records  of  the 
past  accessible  to  us,  it  is  possible  to  escape  from  the  con- 
clusions of  Volney.  If  it  cannot  be  shown  that  the  negro 
race  was  separated  by  a  wide  and  unapproachable  interval 
from  the  founders  of  Babylon  and  Nineveh,  the  builders 
of  Babel  and  the  Pyramids,  then  we  claim  for  them  a  partici- 
pation in  those  ancient  works  of  science  and  art,  and  that  not 
merely  on  the  indefinite  ground  of  a  common  humanity, 
but  on  the  ground  of  close  and  direct  relationship. 

Let  us  turn  to  the  tenth  chapter  of  Genesis,  and  con- 
sider the  ethnographic  allusions  therein  contained,  receiving 
them  in  their  own  grand  and  catholic  spirit.  And  we  the 
more  readily  make  our  appeal  to  this  remarkable  portion 
of  Holy  Writ  because  it  has  "extorted  the  admiration 
of  modern  ethnologists,  who  continually  find  in  it  anticipations 
of  their  greatest  discoveries."  Sir  Henry  Bawlinson  says  of 
this  chapter :  "  The  Toldoth  Beni  Noah  (the  Hebrew  title  of 
the  chapter)  is  undoubtedly  the  most  authentic  record  we  pos- 
sess for  the  affiliation  of  those  branches  of  the  human  race  which 
sprang  from  the  triple  stock  of  the  Noachidae."  And  again : 
"  "We  must  be  cautious  in  drawing  direct^  ethnological  infer- 
ences from  the  linguistic  indications  of  a  very  early  age.  It 
would  be  far  safer,  at  any  rate,  in  these  early  times,  to  follow 
the  general  scheme  of  ethnic  affiliation  which  is  given  in  the 
tenth  chapter  of  Genesis."  * 

From  the  second  to  the  fifth  verse  of  this  chapter  we  have 
the  account  of  the  descendants  of  Japheth  and  their  places 
of  residence,  but  we  are  told  nothing  of  their  doings  or  their 
productions.  From  the  twenty-first  verse  to  the  end  of  the 
chapter  we  have  the  account  of  the  descendants  of  Shem  aud 
of  their  "  dwelling."  Nothing  is  said  of  their  works.  But 
how  different  the  account  of  the  descendants  of  Cush,  ihe 
eldest  son  of  Ham,  contained  from  the  seventh  to  the  twelfth 
verse.  "We  read: '"And  Cush  begat  Nimrod :  he  began 
to  be  a  mighty  one  in  the  earth.  He  was  a  mighty  hunter 
before  the  Lord.  .  .  .  And  the  berrinnin^  of  his  kingdom  was 
Babel,  and  Erech,  and  Accad,  and  Calneh,  in  the  land 
of  Shinar.  Out  of  that  land  he  went  forth  into  Asshur, 
(marginal  reading.)  and  builded  Nineveh,  and  the  city  Beho- 
*  Quoted  by  G.  Rawlinson  in  Notes  to  "  Bamptoa  Lectures,"  1859. 


1SG9.3  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.    '  73 

both,  and  Calab,  and  Resen  between  Nineveh  and  Calah : 
the  same  is  a  great  city." 

We  have  adopted  the  marginal  reading  in  our  English 
Bible,  which  represents  Nimrod  as  having  founded  Nineveh, 
in  addition  to  the  other  great  works  which  he  executed.  This 
reading  is  supported  by  authorities,  both  Jewish  and  Christian, 
which  cannot  be  set  aside.  The  author  of  "  Foundations  of 
History,"  without,  perhaps,  a  due  consideration  of  the  original, 
affirms  that  Asshur  was  "  one  of  the  sons  of  Shem ! "  thus  de- 
spoiling the  descendants  of  Ham  of  the  glory  of  having 
"builded"  Nineveh.  And  to  confirm  this  view  he  tells  us 
that  "Micah  speaks  of  the  land  of  Asshur  and  the  land  of 
Nimrod  as  two  distinct  countries."  We  have  searched  in  vain 
for  the  passage  in  which  the  Prophet  makes  such  a  representa- 
tion. The  verse  to  which  this  author  directs  us  (Micah  v,  6)  is  un- 
fortunate for  this  theory.  It  is  plain  from  the  closing  of  the  verse 
that  the  conjunction  "  and"  in  the  first  clause,  is  not  the  simple 
copulative  and  or  also,  but  is  employed,  according  to  a  well 
known  Hebrew  usage,  in  the  sense  of  even  or  namely,  to  in- 
troduce the  words  "  land  of  Nimrod "  as  an  explanatory  or 
qualifying  addition  in  apposition  to  the  preceding  "land  of 
Assyria."  * 

AVe  must  take  Asshur  in  Gen.  x,  11,  not  as  the  subject  of 
the  verb  "  went,"  but  as  the  name  of  the  place  whither — the 
terminus  ad  quern.  So  Drs.  Smith  and  Yan  Dyck,  eminent 
Oriental  scholars,  understand  the  passage,  and  so  they  have 
rendered  it  in  their  admirable  Arabic  translation  of  the  Bible, 
recently  adopted  by  the  British  and  Foreign  Bible  Society, 
namely,  "  Out  of  that  land  he  (Nimrod)  went  forth  unto 
Asshur— Assyria— and  builded  Nineveh."  De  Sola,  Linden- 
thul,  and  Eaphall,  learned  Jews,  so  translate  the  passage  in 
their  "New  Translation  of  the  Book  of  Genesis."  f  Dr. 
Kalisch,  another  Hebrew  of  the  Hebrews,  so  renders  the  verse 
in  his  "Historical  and  Critical  Commentary  on  Genesis." :{: 
All  these  authorities,  and  others  we  might  mention,  agree  that 

•See  Conant's  Geseniu3*3  Hebrew  Grammar,  (17th  edition,)  section  155,  (a); 
*aA  for  additional  examples  of  this  usage  see  Judges  vii,  22;  1  S..m.  xvii,  10; 
Jtr.  xv,  ]3,  where  even  represents  tho  conjunction  van  (and)  in  the  original. 

f  Loudon,  1S44. 

\  London,  1S5S.  See  Dr.  Robinson's  view  in  Gesenius  8  Hebrew  Lexicon, 
»d«r  the  word  Cuab. 


74  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

to  make  the  passage  descriptive  of  the  Shemite  Asshur  is  to  do 
violence  to  the  passage  itself  and  its  context.  Asshur,  more- 
over, is  mentioned  in  his  proper  place  in  verse  22,  and  without 
the  least  indication  of  an  intention  of  describing  him  as  the 
founder  of  a  rival  empire  to  Nimrod.*  Says  Nachmanides, 
(quoted  by  De  Sola,  etc.)  :  "  It  would  be  strange  if  Asshur,  a 
son  of  Shem,  were  mentioned  among  the  descendants  of  Ham, 
of  whom  Ximrod  was  one.  It  would  be  equally  strange  if  the 
deeds  of  Asshur  were  spoken  of  before  his  birth  and  descent 
had  been  mentioned." 

The  grammatical  objection  to  our  view  is  satisfactorily  dis- 
posed of  by  Kalisch.f  On  the  absence  of  the  n  (he)  locale  he 
remarks:  "The  n  locale,  after  verbs  of  motion,  though  fre- 
quently, is  by  no  means  uniformly,  applied.  (1  Kings  xi,  17; 
2  Kings  xv,  14 ;  etc.)  Gesenius,  whose  authority  no  one  will 
dispute,  also  admits  the  probability  of  the  view  we  have  taken, 
without  raising  any  objection  of  grammatical  structure." 

But  enough  on  this  point.  We  may  reasonably  suppose 
that  the  building  of  the  tower  of  Babel  was  also  the  work, 
principally,  of  Cushites.  For  we  read  in  the  tenth  verse  that 
Nimrod's  kingdom  was  in  the  land  of  Shinar;  and  in 
the  second  verse  of  the  eleventh  chapter  we  are  told  that  the 
people  who  undertook  the  building  of  the  tower,  "found  a 
plain  in  the  laud  of  Shinar"  which  they  considered  suitable 
for  the  ambitious  structure.  And,  no  doubt,  in  the  "  scatter- 
ing "  which  resulted,  these  sons  of  Ham  found  their  way  into 
Egypt,:};  where  their  descendants — inheriting  the  skill  of  their 
fathers,  and  guided  by  tradition — erected  the  pyramids  in 
imitation  of  the  celebrated  tower.  Herodotus  says  that  the 
tower  was  six  hundred  and  sixty  feet  high,  or  one  hundred  and 
seventy  feet  higher  than  the  great  pyramid  of  Cheops.  It 
consisted  of  eight  square  towers,  one  above  another.  The 
■winding  path  is  said  to  have  been  four  miles  in  length.  Strabo 
calls  it  a  pyramid.- 

But  it  may  be  said,  The  enterprising  people  who  founded 
Babylon  and  Nineveh,  settled  Egypt,  and  built  the  Pyramids, 

*  See  Kitto's  Biblical  Cyclopedia,  article,  Ham.     London,  1866. 

f  Historical  and  Critical  Commentary  on  Genesis.     Heb.  and  Eug.     P.  2C3. 

\  It  is  certain  that  Mizraim,  with  his  descendants,  settled  Egypt,  giving  his 
name  to  the  country/  which  it  still  retains.  The  Arabic  name  for  Egypt  is 
Misr.    In  Psalm  cv,  23,  Egypt  i?  called  "  the  land  of  Ham." 


ISCi).]  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  75 

though  descendants  of  Ham,  were  not  black — were  not  negroes ; 
for,  granted  that  the  negro  race  have  descended  from  Ham,  yet, 
when  these  great  civilizing  works  were  going  on  the  descend- 
ants of  Ham  had  not  yet  reached  that  portion  of  Africa,  had 
not  come  in  contact  with  those  conditions  of  climate  and  atmos- 
phere which  have  produced  that  peculiar  development  of 
humanity  known  as  the  J^egro. 

Well,  let  us  see.  It  is  not  to  be  doubted  that  from  the 
earliest  ages  the  black  complexion  of  some  of  the  descendants 
of  Xoah  was  known.  Ham,  it  would  seem,  was  of  a  com- 
plexion darker  than  that  of  his  brothers.  The  root  of  the 
name  Ham,  in  Hebrew  B»n,  (Hamam,)  conveys  the  idea  of  not 
or  swarthy.  So  the  Greeks  called  the  descendants  of  Ham, 
from  their  black  complexion,  Ethiopians,  a  word  signifying 
burnt  or  black  face.  The  Hebrews  called  them  Cushites,  a 
word  probably  of  kindred  meaning.  Moses  is  said  to  have 
married  a  Cushite  or  Ethiopian  woman,  that  is,  a  black 
woman  descended  from  Cush.  The  query,  "Can  the  Ethi- 
opian change  his  skin  ? "  seems  to  be  decisive  as  to  a  differ- 
ence of  complexion  between  the  Ethiopian  and  the  Shemite, 
and  the  etymology  of  the  word  itself  determines  that  the  com- 
plexion of  the  former  was  black.  The  idea  has  been  thrown 
out  that  the'  three  principal  colors  now  in  the  world — white, 
brown,  and  black — were  represented  in  the  ark  in  Japheth, 
Shcin,  and  Ham. 

But  were  these  enterprising  descendants  of  Ham  woolly- 
haired? — a  peculiarity  which,  in  these  days,  seems  to  be 
considered  a  characteristic  mark  of  degradation  and  ser- 
vility.* On  this  point  let  us  consult  Herodotus,  called  "  the 
father  of  history."  He  lived  nearly  three  thousand  years  ago. 
Having  traveled  extensively  in  Egypt  and  the  neighboring 
countries,  he  wrote  from  personal  observation.     His  testimony 

*  While  Rev.  Elias  Sehrenk,  a  German  missionary  laboring  on  the  Gold  Coast. 
in  giving  evidence  on  the  condition  of  West  Africa  before  a  committee  of  the 
House  of  Commons  in  May,  18C5,  was  making  a  statement  of  the  proficiency 
of  sorao  of  the  natives  in  his  school  in  Greek  and  other  branches  of  literature,  he 
was  interrupted  by  Mr.  Cheetham,  a  member  of  the  committee,  with  the  Inquiry: 
*'  Were  those  young  men  of  pure  African  blood?"  '"Yes,"  replied  Mr.  Sehrenk, 
"  decidedly;  thick  lips  and  black  skin."  "  And  woolly  hair?  "  added  Mr.  Cheet- 
ham. "  And  woolly  hair,"  subjoined  Mr.  Sehrenk.  (See  "  Parliamentary  Report 
on  Western  Africa  for  1360;"  p.  145.) 


76  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

is  that  of  an  eye-witness.  He  tells  us  that  there  were  two 
divisions  of  Ethiopians,  who  did  not  differ  at  all  from  each 
other  in  appearance,  except  in  their  language  and  hair;  "  for 
the  eastern  Ethiopians,"  he  says,  u  are  straight-haired,  but 
those  of  Libya  (or  Africa)  have  hair  more  curly  than  that 
of  any  other  people."*  He  records  also  the  following  passage, 
which  fixes  the  physical  characteristics  of  the  Egyptians  and 
some  of  their  mighty  neighbors  :  f 

The  Colchians  were  evidently  Egyptians,  and  I  say  this  homing 
myself  observed  it  before  I  heard  it  from  others ;  and  as  it  was  a 
matter  of  interest  to  me,  I  inquired  of  both  people,  and  the 
Colchians  had  more  recollection  of  the  Egyptians  than  the  Egyp- 
tians had  of  the  Colchians  ;  yet  the  Egyptians  said  that  they 
thought  the  Colchians  had  descended  from  the  army  of  Sesostris  ; 
and  I  formed  my  conjecture,  not  only  because  they  are  black  in 
complexion  and.icoolly-haired,  for  this  amounts  to  nothing,  because 
others  are  so  likewise,  etc.,  etc.  J 

Eawlinson^  has  clearly  shown  §  that  these  statements  of 
Herodotus  have  been  too  strongly  confirmed  by  all  recent 
researches  (among  the  cuneiform  inscriptions]  in  comparative 
philology  to  be  set  aside  by  the  tottering  criticism  of  such 
superficial  inquirers  as  the  Notts  and  Gliddous,  et  id  omne 
ge?ius,  who  base  their  assertions  on  ingenious  conjectures. 
Pindar  and  i&schyhts  corroborate  the  assertions  of  Herodotus. 
Homer,  who  liyed  still  earlier  than  Herodotus,  and  who  had 
also  traveled  in  Egypt,  makes  frequent  mention  of  the 
Ethiopians.  He  bears  the  same  testimony  as  Herodotus  as  to 
their  division  into  two  sections: 

Aldiarrac,  rot  <Jfp9d  dedatarai,  tox^TOt  dvdp&v, 
lOl  fiev  6vao\iivov  'Tirepiovoq,  ol  6'  dvtovroc —  | 

which  Pope  freely  renders : 

"  A  race  divided,  whom  with  sloping  rays 
The  rising  and  descending  sun  surveys." 

*  Herodotus,  hi,  94;  vii,  70. 

f  It  is  not  necessary,  however,  to  consider  all  Egyptians  as  negroes,  black  in 
complexion  and  woolly-haired;  this  is  contradicted  by  th,eir  mummies  and 
portraits.  Bluinenbach  discovered  three  varieties  of  physiognomy  on  the  Egyptian 
paintings  and  sculptures ;  but  ho  describes  the  general  or  national  type  as 
exhibiting  a  certain  approximation  to  the  Xegro. 

\  Herodotus,  ii,  101.  §  Five  Great  Monarchies,  vol.  i,  chap.  3. 

|  Odyssey,  i,  23,  24.' 


IS  GO  J  The  Negro  in  Ancient  Histwy.  77 

And  Homer  seems  to  have  entertained  the  very  highest 
cninion  of  these  Ethiopians.  It  would  appear  that  he  was  so 
Btruck  with  the  wonderful  works  of  these  people,  which  he 
B&w  in  Es;ypt  and  the  surrounding  country,  that  he  raises  their 
authors  above  mortals,  and  makes  them  associates  of  the  gods. 
Jupiter,  and  sometimes  the  whole  Olympian  family  with  him, 
18  often  made  to  betake  himself  to  Ethiopia  to  hold  converse 
with  and  partake  of  the  hospitality  of  the  Ethiopians.* 

.But  it  may  be  asked,  Are  we  to  suppose  that  the  Guinea 
ncro,  with  all  his  peculiarities,  is  descended  from  these 
people  1  We  answer,  Yes.  The  descendants  of  Ham,  in 
those  early  ages,  like  the  European  nations  of  the  present  day, 
made  extensive  migrations  and  conquests.  They  occupied 
a  portion  of  two  continents.  While  the  Shemites  had  but 
little  connection  with  Africa,  the  descendants  of  Ham,  on  the 
contrary,  beginning  then-  operations  in  Asia,  spread  westward 
and  southward,  so  that  as  early  as  the  time  of  Homer  they 
had  not  only  occupied  the  northern  portions  of  Africa,  but  had 
crossed  the  great  desert,  penetrated  into  Soudan,  and  made 
their  way  to  the  west  coast.  "As  far  as  we  know,"  says  that 
distinguished  Homeric  scholar,  Mr.  Gladstone,  "Homer  re- 
cognized the  African  coast  by  placing  the  Lotophagi  upon  it, 
and  the  Ethiopians  inland  from  ths  East  all  the  way  to  the 
extreme  West."  f 

Some  time  ago  Professor  Owen,  of  the  New  York  Free 
Academy,  well  known  for  his  remarkable  accuracy  in  editing 
the  ancient  classics,  solicited  the  opinion  of  Professor  Lewis  of 
the  Xew  York  University,  another  eminent  scholar,  as  to  the 
hfalities  to  which  Homer's  Ethiopians  ought  to  be  assigned. 
Professor  Lewis  gave  a  reply  which  so  pleased  Professor  Owen 
that  he  gives  it  entire  in  his  notes  on  the  Odyssey,  as  "  the 
most  rational  and  veritable  comment  of  any  he  had  met  with." 
It  is  as  follows: 

I  have  always,  in  commenting  on  the  passage  to  which  you 
uiVr,  explained  it  to  my  classes  as  denoting  the  black  race,  (or 
Ktldopians,  as  they  were  called  in  Homer's  time,)  living  on  the 
eastern  and  western  coast  of  Africa — the  one  class  inhabiting  the 
<'"<mtry  now  called  Abyssinia,  and  the  other  that  part  of  Africa 
called  Guinea  or  the  Slave  Coast.     The  common  explanation  that 

*  Iliad,  i,  423  ;  xxiii,  206. 

f  "Homer  and  the  Homeric  Ago,"  vol.  iii,  p.  305. 


78  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

it  refers  to  two  divisions  of  Upper  Egypt  separated  by  the  Nile, 
besides,  as  I  believe,  being  geographically  incorrect,  (the  Nile 
really  making  no  such  division,)  does  not  seem  to  be  of  sufficient 
importance  to  warrant  the  strong  expressions  of  the  text. 
(Odyssey  i,  22-24.)  If  it  be  said  the  view  I  have  taken  supposes 
too  great  a  knowledge  of  geography  in  Homer,  we  need  only 
bear  in  mind  that  he  had  undoubtedly  visited  Tyre,  -where  the 
existence  of  the  black  race  on  the  West  of  Africa  had  been 
known  from  the  earliest  times.  The  Tyrians,  in  their  long 
voyages,  having  discovered  a  race  on  the  West,  in  almost  every 
respect  similar  to  those  better  known  in  the  East,  would,  from 
their  remote  distance  from  each  other,  and  not  knowing  of  any 
intervening  nations  in  Africa,  naturally  style  them  the  two 
extremities  of  the  earth.  (Homer's  eaxaroi  avdpuv.)  Homer 
elsewhere  speaks  of  the  Pigmies,  who  are  described  by  Herodotus 
and  Diodorus  Siculus  as  residing  in  the  interior  of  Africa,  (on  a 
river  which  I  think  corresponds  to  what  is  now  called  the  Niger.) 
It  seems  to  me  too  extravagant  language,  even  for  poetry,  to 
represent  two  nations,  separated  only  by  a  river,  as  living,  one  at 
the  rising,  the  other  at  the  setting  sun,  although  these  terms  may 
sometimes  be  used  for  East  and  West.  Besides,  if  I  am  not 
mistaken,  no  such  division  is  recognized  in  subsequent  geog- 
raphy.* 

Professor  Lewis  says  nothing  of  the  Asiatic  division  of  the 
Ethiopians.  But  since  his  letter  was  penned — more  than 
twenty  years  ago — floods  of  light  have  been  thrown  upon  the 
subject  of  Oriental  antiquities  by  the  labors  of  M.  Botta, 
Layard,  Bawlinson,  Hinks,  and  others.  Even  Bunsen,  not 
very  long  ago,  declared  that  "the  idea  of  an  'Asiatic  Ciisk'' 
was  an  imagination  of  interpreters,  the  child  of  despair." 
But  in  185S,  Sir  Henry  Rawlinson  having  obtained  a  number 
of  Babylonian  documents  more  ancient  than  any  previously 
discovered,  was  able  to  declare  authoritatively  that  the  early 
inhabitants  of  South  Babylonia  were  of  a  cognate  race  with  the 
pi^imitive  colonists  both  of  Arabia  and  of  the  African 
Ethiopia.^  He  found  their  vocabulary  to  be  undoubtedly 
Cushite  or  Ethiopian,  belonging  to  that  stock  of  tongues  which 
in  the  sequel  were  every-where  more  or  less  mixed  up  with 
the  Semitic  languages,  but  of  which  we  have  the  purest 
modern  specimens  in  the  "Mahra  of  Southern  Arabia,"  and 
the  "  Galla  of  Abyssinia."  He  also  produced  evidence  of  the 
widely-spread  settlements  of  the  children  of  Ham  in  Asia  as 

*  Owen's  Homer'.?  Odyssey,  (Fifth  Edition.)  p.  306. 
f  Rawliusou's  Herodotus.     Vol.  i,  p.  442. 


ImiOJ  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  "79 

uxll  09  Africa,  and  (what  is  more  especially  valuable  in  our 
pm-ent  inquiry)  of  the  truth  of  the  tenth  chapter  of  Genesis 
n«  nn  ethnographical  document  of  the  highest  importance.* 

Xow  we  should  like  to  ask,  If  the  negroes  found  at  this 
moment  along  the  West  and  East  coast,  and  throughout 
Central  Africa,  are  not  descended  from  the  ancient  Ethiopians, 
from  whom  are  they  descended  ?  And  if  they  are  the  children 
of  the  Ethiopians,  what  is  the  force  of  the  assertions  continu- 
nllv  repeated,  by  even  professed  friends  of  the  negro,  that  the 
enterprising  and  good-looking  tribes  of  the  continent,  such  as 
Lalofs,  Mandingoes,  and  Foulahs,  are  mixed  with  the  blood  of 
Caucasians  \  f  With  the  records  of  ancient  history  before  us, 
where  is  the  necessity  for  supposing  such  an  admixture? 
May  not  the  intelligence,  the  activity,  the  elegant  features 
and  limbs  of  these  tribes  have  been  directly  transmitted  from 
their  ancestors  ? 

The  Foulahs  have  a  tradition  that  they  are  the  descendants 
<>f  Phut,  the  son  of  Ham.  Whether  this  tradition  be  true  or  not, 
it  is  a  singular  fact  that  they  have  prefixed  this  name  to  almost 
every  district  of  any  extent  which  they  have  ever  occupied. 
They  have  Futa-Torro,  near  Senegal ;  Futa-Bondu  and  Futa- 
lallou  to  the  north-east  of  Sierra  Leoue.J 

Lenormant  was  of  the  opinion  that  Phut  peopled  Libya. 

We  gather  from  the  ancient  writers  already  quoted  that 
the  Ethiopians  were  celebrated  for  their  beauty.  Herodotus 
f  peaks  of  them  as  "  men  of  large  stature,  very  handsome  and 
1« 'tig-lived."  And  he  uses  these  epithets  in  connection  with 
the  Ethiopians  of  West  Africa,  as  the  context  shows.  The 
whole  passage  is  as  follows  : 

Where  the  meridian  declines  toward  the  setting  sun   (that  is, 
southwest  from  Greece)  the  Ethiopian  territory  reaches,  being  the 
extreme   part  of  the  habitable   world.      It  produces  much  guld, 
huge  elephants,  wild  trees  of  all  kinds,  ebony,  and  men  of  large, 
Ftature,  very  handsome,  and  long-lived.§ 

Homer  frequently  tells  us  of  the  "  handsome  Ethiopians," 
although  he  and  Herodotus  do  not  employ  the  same  Greek 
word.     In  Herodotus  the  word  that  describes  the  Ethiopians 

*  See  Article  Hunt,  in  Kitto's  Cyclopedia.     Last  Edition. 

f  Bowcn's  "  Central' Africa,"  chap  xxiii.  %  "Wilson's  "Western  Africa,  p.  79. 

§  Herodotus,  iii,  114. 


80  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.         [January, 

is  KaTjoq — a  word  denoting  both  beauty  of  outward  form  and 
moral  beauty  or  virtue.*  The  epithet  (ajuv/zwv)  employed  by 
Homer  -to  describe  the  sairre  people  is  by  some  commentators 
rendered  "blameless,"  but  by  the  generality  "handsome." 
Anthon  says :  "  It  is  an  epithet  given  to  all  men  and  women 
distinguished  by  rank,  exploits,  or  beauty."  f  Mr.  Hayman, 
one  of  the  latest  and  most  industrious  editors  of  Homer,  has  in 
one  of  his  notes  the  following  explanation  :  "  Afivpuv  was  at 
first  an  epithet  of  distinctive  excellence,  but  had  become  a 
purely  conventional  style,  as  applied  to  a  class,  like  our 
4  honorable  and  gallant  gentleman.'  "  %  Most  scholars,  how- 
ever, agree  with  Mr.  Paley,  another  recent  Homeric  com- 
mentator, that  the  original  signification  of  the  word  was 
"  handsome,"  and  that  it  nearly  represented  the  acoAoc  Kayadog 
of  the  Greeks ;  §  so  that  the  words  which  Homer  puts  into  the 
mouth  of  Thetis  when  addressing  her  disconsolate  son  (Iliad, 
i,  423)  would  be,  "  Yesterday  Jupiter  went  to  Oceanus,  to  the 
handsome  Ethiopians,  to  a  banquet,  and  with  him  went  all  the 
gods."  It  is  remarkable  that  the  Chaldee,  according  to  Bush 
has  the  following  translation  of  Numbers  xii,  1:  "And 
Miriam  and  Aaron  spake  against  Moses  because  of  the  beauti- 
ful woman  whom  he  had  married ;  for  he  had  married  a 
beautiful  woman."  |  Compare  with  this  Solomon's  declara- 
tion, "  I  am  Hack  but  comely?  or,  more  exactly,  "  I  am 
black  and  comely."  We  see  the  wise  man  in  his  spiritual 
epithalamium  selecting  a  black  woman  as  a  proper  representa- 
tive of  the  Church  and  of  the  highest  purity.  The  word 
"WO,  translated  in  our  version  hlach,  is  a  correct  rendering. 
So  Luther,  schwarz.  It  cannot  mean  brown,  as  rendered  by 
Ostervald  (Irune)  and  Diodati  (bruna.)  In  Lev.  xiii,  31,  37, 
it  is  applied  to  hair.  The  verb  from  which  the  adjective 
comes  is  used  (Job  xxx,  30)  of  the  countenance  blackened  by 
■  disease.  In  Solomon's  Song  v,  11,  it  is  applied  to  the  plumage 
of  a  raven. ■[  In  the  days  of  Solomon,  therefore,  black,  as  a 
physical  attribute,  was  comely. 

*  Lidtlell  ft  Scott.  f  Anthon's  Homer,  p.  491. 

X  Hayniau's  Odyssey,  i,  29.     §  Paley's  Iliad,  p.  215.     Note.     |  Bush,  in  loco. 

*i  A  correspondent  of  the  New  York  Tribune,  residing  in  Syri.V,  describing  the 
appearance  of  a  negro  whom  he  met  there  in  1SGC,  says:  "lie  was  as  Hack  as  a 
Mount  Lebanon  raven."  (N\  Y.  Tribune,  October  16,  1SGG.)  Had  he  been 
writing  in  Hebrew  he  would  have  employed  the  descriptive  word  "in'O- 


\ 


1*01'.]  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  81 

But  wheD,  in  the  course  of  ages,  the  Ethiopians  had 
wandered  into  the  central  and  southern  regions  of  Africa, 
mcuuntering  a  change  of  climate  and  altered  character  of 
f.KHl  and  modes  of  living,  they  fell  into  intellectual  and 
physical  degradation.  This  degradation  did  not  consist, 
however,  in  a  change  of  color,  as  some  suppose,  for  they  were 
Mack,  as  we  have  seen,  before  they  left  their  original  seat. 
Nor  did  it  consist  in  the  stiffening  and  shortening  of  the  hair  ; 
for  Herodotus  tells  us  that  the  Ethiopians  in  Asia  were 
i'.raijht-haired,  while  their  relatives  in  Africa,  from  the  same 
Itock  and  in  no  lower  stage  of  progress,  were  woolly- haired. 
The  hair,  then,  is  not  a  fundamental  characteristic,  nor  a 
mark  of  degradation.  Some  suppose  that  the  hair  of  the' 
vx^ro  is  affected  by  some  peculiarity  in  the  African  climate  • 
and  atmosphere — perhaps  the  influence  of  the  Sahara  entering 
a?  an  important  element.  "We  do  not  profess  to  know  the 
fvns  et  origo,  nor  have  we  seen  any  satisfactory  cause  for  it 
aligned.  We  have  no  consciousness  of  any  inconvenience 
from  it,  except  that  in  foreign  countries,  as  a  jovial  fellow- 
passenger  on  an  English  steamer  once  reminded  us,  "  it  is 
unpopular." 

"  Vuolsi  cosi  cola,  dove  si  puote 
Cid  che  si  vuole :  e  pill  non  dimandare."* 

Nor  should  it  be  thought  strange  that  the  Ethiopians  who 
j<netrated  into  the  heart  of  the  African  continent  should  have 
•generated,  when  we  consider  their  distance  and  isolation 
from  the  quickening  influence  of  the  arts  and  sciences  in  the 
East ;  their  belief,  brought  with  them,  in  the  most  abominable 
idolatry,  "  changing  the  glory  of  the  incorruptible  God  into  an 
image  made  like  unto  corruptible  man,  and  to  birds,  and 
four-footed  beasts,  and  creeping  things"  Rom.  i,  23 ;  the  ease 
with  which,  in  the  prolific  regions  to  which  they  had  come, 
tht-v  could  secure  the  means  of  subsistence ;  and  the  constant 
and  enervating  heat  of  the  climate,  indisposing  to  continuous 
txcrtion.  Students  in  natural  history  tell  us  that  animals  of 
the  Paine  species  and  family,  if  dispersed  and  domesticated, 
fh'.»\v  striking  modifications  of  the  original  type,  in  their  color, 
1'fcir.  integument,  structure  of  limbs,  and  even  in  their 
instincts,  habits,  and  powers.  Similar  changes  are  witnessed 
*  Dante. 


The  Negro  in  Ancient  HUcory,  CJanuai 


j  i 


among   mankind.     An   intelligent   writer   in    No.   48  of  the 
"  Dublin  University  Magazine  "  says  : 

There  are  certain  districts  in  Leitrim,  Sligo,  and  Mayo  chiefly 
inhabited  by  the  descendants  of  the  native  Irish,  driven  by  the 
British  from  Armagh  and  the  South  of  Down  about  two  centuries 
ago.  These  people,  whose  ancestors  were  well-grown,  able-bodied, 
and  comely,  are  now  reduced  to  an  average  stature  of  five  feet 
two  inches,  are  pot-bellied,  bow-legged,  and  abortively  featured  ; 
and  they  are  especially  remarkable  for  open  projecting  mouths, 
and  prominent  teeth,  and  exposed  gums,  their  advancing  cheek- 
bones and  depressed  noses  bearing  barbarism  in  their  very  front. 
In  •  other  words,  within  so  short  a  period,  they  seem  to  have 
acquired  a  prognathous  type  of  skull,  like  the  Australian  savages. 

But  these  retrogressive  changes  are  taking  place  in  other 
countries  besides  Ireland.  Acute  observers  tell  us  that,  in 
England,  the  abode  of  the  highest  civilization  of  modern 
times,  "  a  process  of  de-civilization,  a  relapse  toward  barbarism, 
is  seen  in  the  debased  and  degraded  classes,  with  a  coincident 
deterioration  of  physical  type."  Mr.  Henry  Mayhew,  in  his 
"  London  Labor  and  London  Poor,"  has  remarked  that 

Among  them,  according  as  they  partake  more  or  less  of  the 
pure  vagabond  nature,  doing  nothing  whatever  for  their  living, 
but  moving  from  place  to  place,  preying  on  the  earnings  of  the 
more  industrious  portion  of  the  community,  so  will  the  attributes 
of  the  nomadic  races  be  found  more  or  less  marked  in  them  ;  and 
they  are  all  more  or  less  distinguished  by  their  high  cheek-bones 
and  protruding  jaws  ;  thus  showing  that  kind  of  mixture  of  the 
pyramidal  with  the  prognathous  type  which  is  to  be  seen  among 
the  most  degraded  of  the  Malayo-Polynesian  races. 

In  contrast  with  this  retrogressive  process,  it  may  be 
observed  that  in  proportion  as  the  degraded  races  are  intellect- 
ually and  morally  elevated,  their  physical  appearance  im- 
proves. Mr.  C.  S.  Roundell,  secretary  to  the  late  Royal 
Commission  in  Jamaica,  tells  us  that 

The  Maroons  who  fell  under  my  (his)  own  observation  in 
Jamaica,  exhibited  a  marked  superiority  in  respect  of  comport- 
ment, mental  capacity,  and  physical  type — a  superiority  to  be 
referred  to  the  saving  effects  of  long-enjoyed  freedom.  The 
Maroons  are  descendants  of  runaway  Spanish  slaves,  who  at  the 
time  of  the  British  conquest  established  themselves  in  the  mount- 
ain fastnesses.* 

*  "England  and  her  Subject  Races,  with  special  reference  to  Jamaica,"  By 
Charles  Saville  Roundell,  M.  A. 


J  $09.]  TJie  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  83 

In  visiting  the  native  towns  interior  to  Liberia,  we  have 
leeo  striking  illustrations  of  these  principles..  Among  the 
inhabitants  of  those  towns  we  could  invariably  distinguish  the 
free  man  from  the  slave.  There  was  about  the  former  a 
dignity  of  appearance,  an  openness  of  countenance,  an  inde- 
pendence of  air,  a  firmness  of  step,  which  indicated  the 
absence  of  oppression ;  while  in  the  latter  there  was  a  de- 
pression of  countenance,  a  general  deformity  of  appearance,  an 
awkwardness  of  gait,  which  seemed  to  say,  "  That  man  is  a  slave." 

Now,  with  these  well-known  principles  before  us,  why 
ihonld  it  be  considered  strange  that,  with  their  fall  into 
barbarism,  the  "  handsome  "  Ethiopians  of  Homer  and  Herod- 
otus should  have  deteriorated  in  physical  type — and  that  this 
degradation  of  type  should  continue  reproducing  itself  in  the 
wilds  of  Africa  and  in  the  Western  Hemisphere,  where  they 
have  been  subjected  to  slavery  and  various  other  forms  of 
debasing  proscription  % 

*Hj[«ffv  yag  r'  dperfjg  dtroaivvrai  evpvorra  Zeiig 
'Avepoc,  evr3  dv  yuv  Kara  dovXiov  Tjfiap  Skffffiv,* 

The  Xegro  is  often  taunted  by  superficial  investigators  with 
proofs,  as  is  alleged,  taken  from  the  monuments  of  Egypt,  of 
the  servitude  of  Xegroes  in  very  remote  ages.  But  is  there 
any  thing  singular  in  the  fact  that  in  very  early  times  Xegroes 
*fre  held  in  bondage  ?  Was  it  not  the  practice  among  all  the 
early  nations  to  enslave  each  other  2  Why  should  it  be  pointed 
to  as  an  exceptional  thing  that  Ethiopians  were  represented 
M  slaves?  It  was  very  natural  that  the  more  powerful  Ethi- 
opians should  seize  upon  the  weaker,  as  is  done  to  this  day  in 
retain  portions  of  Africa,  and  reduce  them  to  slavery.  And 
Were  it  not  for  the  abounding  light  of  Christianity  now  enjoyed 
hi  Kurope  the  same  thing  would  be  done  at  this  moment  in 
Koine,  Paris,  and  London.  For  the  sites  of  those  cities  in 
ancient  times  witnessed  all  the  horrors  of  a  cruel  and  mer- 
•■••Tiary  slave-trade,  not  in  Negroes,  but  Caucasian  selling 
^uueasian.f 

*  Oijtttf,  xvii.  322,  323. 

t  Cicoro  in  one  of  his  letters,  speaking  of  the  success  of  an  expedition  against 
I'^iain,  gava  the  only  plunder  to  be  found  consisted  "Ex  emancipiis;  ex 
V  bw  titiUos  puto  te  liteiis  aut  musicis  eruditos  expectare;"  thus  proving,  in  the 
■mm  Mutence,  the  existence  of  the  slave-trade,  and  intimating  that  it  was  impoa 


84  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January 

But  were  there  no  Caucasian  slaves  in  Egypt  ?  If  it  be  true 
that  no  such  slaves  are  represented  on  the  monumental  re- 
mains, are  we,  therefore,  to  infer  that  they  did  not  exist  in  that 
country?  Are  we  to  disbelieve  that  the  Jews  were  in  the 
most  rigorous  bondage  in  that  land  for  four  hundred  years : 

Not  every  thing  which  is  not  represented  on  the  monuments  was 
therefore  necessarily  unknown  to  the  Egyptians.  The  monuments 
are  neither  intended  to  furnish,  nor  can"  they  furnish,  a  complete 
delineation  of  all  the  branches  of  public  and  private  life,  of  all  the 
products  and  phenomena  of  the  whole  animal,  vegetable,  and  min- 
eral creation  of  the  country.  They  cannot  be  viewed  as  a  complete 
cyclopaedia  of  Egyptian  customs  and  civilization.  Thus  we  find 
no  representation  of  fowls  and  pigeons,  although  the  country 
abounded  in  them;  of  the  wild  ass  and  wild  boar,  although 
frequently  met  with  in  Egypt ;  none  of  the  process  relating  to  the 
casting  of  statues  and  other  objects  in  bronze,  although  many 
similar  subjects  connected  with  the  arts  are  represented";  none  of 
the  marriage  ceremony,  and  of  numerous  other  subjects.* 

But  we  are  told  that  the  Negroes  of  Central  and  West 
Africa  have  proved  themselves  essentially  inferior  from  the 
fact,  that  in  the  long  period  of  three  thousand  years  they  have 
shown  no  signs  of  progress.  In  their  country,  it  is  alleged,  are 
to  be  found  no  indications  of  architectural  taste  or  skill,  or  of 
any  susceptibility  of  aesthetic  or  artistic  improvement ;  that 
they  have  no  monuments  of  past  exploits;  no  paintings  or 
sculptures ;  and  that,  therefore,  tlie  foreign  or  American  slave- 
trade  was  an  indispensable  agency  in  the  civilization  of  Africa ; 
that  nothing  could  have  been  done  for  the  Negro  while  he 
remained  in  his  own  land  bound  to  the  practices  of  ages;  that 
he  needed  the  sudden  and  violent  severance  from  home  to 
deliver  him  from  the  quiescent  degradation  and  stagnant  bar- 
barism of  his  ancestors;  that  otherwise  the  civilization  of 
Europe  could  never  have  impressed  him. 

In  reply  to  all  this  we  remark:  1st,  That  it  remains  to  be 

sible  that  any  Briton  should  be  intelligent  enough  to  be  worthy  to  serve  the 
accomplished  Atticus.  (Ad.  Att.,  lib.  iv,  16.)  Henry,  in  his  History  of  England, 
gives  us  also  the-  authority  of  Strabo  for  the  prevalence  of  tho  slave-trade  among 
the  Britons,  and  tells  us  that  slaves  were  once  an  established  article  of  export. 
"  Great  numbers,"  says  he,  "  wer.e  exported  from  Britain,  and  were  to  be  soen 
exposed  for  sale,  like  cattle,  in  tho  Roman  market." — Henry,  vol.  ii,  p.  225.  Also, 
Sir  T.  Fowell  Buxton's  "Slave  Trade  and  Remedy  "—Introduction. 
*  Dr  Kalisch:  "Commentary  on  Exodus,"  p.  H7.     London,  1S55. 


l^OOj  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  85 

proved,  by  a  fuller  explanation  of  the  interior,  that  there  are 
DO  architectural  remains,  no  works  of  artistic  skill ;  2dly,  If  it 
ibould  be  demonstrated  that  nothing  of  the  kind  exists,  this 
would  not  necessarily  prove  essential  inferiority  on  the  part  of 
the  African.  What  did  the  Jews  produce  in  all  the  long 
period  of  their  history  before  and  after  their  bondage  to  the 
Egyptians,  among  whom,  it  might  be  supposed,  they  would 
hive  made  some  progress  in  science  and  art?  Their  forefathers 
dwelt  in  tents  before  their  Egyptian  residence,  and  they  dwelt 
in  tents  after  their  emancipation.  And  in  all  their  long 
national  history  they  produced  no  remarkable  architectural 
monument  but  the  Temple,  which  was  designed  and  executed 
by  a  man  miraculously  endowed  for  the  purpose.  A  high  anti- 
quarian authority  tells  us  that  "pure  Shemites  had  no  art."* 
The  lack  of  architectural  and  artistic  skill  is  no  mark  of  the 
absence  of  the  higher  elements  of  character,  f  3rdly,  With  re- 
gard to  the  necessity  of  the  slave  trade,  we  remark,  without 
attempting  to  enter  into  the  secret  counsels  of  the  Most  High, 
that  without  the  foreign  slave-trade  Africa  would'  have  been 
a  £reat  deal  more  accessible  to  civilization,  and  would  now, 
bad  peaceful  and  legitimate  intercourse  been  kept  up  with  her 
frum  the  middle  of  the  fifteenth  century,  be  taking  her  stand 
next  to  Europe  in  civilization,  science,  and  religion.  When, 
four  hundred  years  ago,  the  Portuguese  discovered  this  coast, 
'.hey  found  the  natives  living  in  considerable  peace  and  quiet- 
^e**,  and  with  a  certain  degree  of  prosperity.  Internal  feuds, 
of  course,  the  tribes  sometimes  had,  but  by  no  means  so  serious 
U  they  afterward  became  under  the  stimulating  influence  of 
Uie  slave-trade.      From  all  we  can  gather,  the  tribes  in  this 

•  Iicv.  Stuart  Poole,  of  the  British  Museum,  before  the  British  Association.  1864. 

T  I-ov.  Dr.  Goulburn;  in  his    reply  to  Dr.  Temple's  celebrated  Essay   on   the 

Mucation  of  the  World,"  has  the  following  suggestive  remark:   "We  commend 

-1  I»r.  Temple's  notice  the  pregnant  fact,  that  in  the  earliest  extant  history  of  man- 

'  M  it  is  stated  that  arts,  both  ornamental  and  useful,  (and  arts  are  the  great 

•  un  of  civilization,)  took  their  rise  in  the  family  of  Cain.     In  the  lino  of  Seth 

..:ul  none  of   this  mental  and  social  development." — Replies    to   Essays   and 

•"••'tf-j,  p.  3-t.     When  the  various  causes  now  co-operatiug  shall  have  produced 

-  ■•  gMT  religious  sense  among  the  nations,  and  a  corresponding  revolution  shall 

'  -v<--  taken    place  in  the  estimation  now  put    upon  material  objects,  tho  effort 

1  -•  to  show,  to  his  disparagement — if  wo  could  imagino  such  an  unaraiable 

■ta-Ukiag  as  compatible  with  the  high  state  of  progress  theu  attained— that  the 

i  ►ro  was  at  the  foundation  of  all  niatorial  development. 

rouirni  Seiues,  Vol.  XXI.— 6 


86  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

part  of  Africa  lived  in  a  condition  not  very  different  from  that 
of  the  greater  portion  of  Europe  in  the  Middle  Ages.  There 
was  the  same  oppression  of  the  weak  by  the  strong  ;  the  same 
resistance  by  the  weak,  often  taking  the  form  of  general  rebel- 
lion ;  the  same  private  and  hereditary  wars;  the  same  strong- 
holds in  every  prominent  position;  the  same  dependence  of 
the  people  upon  the  chief  who  happened  to  be  in  power ;  the 
same  contentedness  of  the  masses  with  the  tyrannical  rnle. 
But  there  was  industry  and  activity,  and  in  every  town  there 
were  manufactures,  and  they  seut  across  the  continent  to 
Egypt  and  the  Barbary  States  other  articles  besides  slaves. 

The  permanence  for  centuries  of  the  social  and  political 
states  of  the  Africans  at  home  must  be  attributed,  first,  to  the 
isolation  of  the  people  from  the  progressive  portion  of  man- 
kind ;  and,  secondly,  to  the  blighting  influence  of  the  traffic 
introduced  among  them  by  Europeans.  Had  not  the  demand 
arisen  in  America  for  African  laborers,  and  had  European 
nations  inaugurated  regular  traffic  with  the  coast,  the  natives 
would  have  shown  themselves  as  impressible  for  change,  as 
susceptible  of  improvement,  as  capable  of  acquiring  knowledge 
and  accumulating  wealth,  as  the  natives  of  Europe.  Combi- 
nation of  capital  and  co-operation  of  energies  would  have  done 
for  this  land  what  they  have  done  for  others.  Private  enter- 
prise, (which  has  been  entirely  destroyed  by  the  nefarious 
traffic,)  encouraged  by  humane  intercourse  with  foreign  lands, 
would  have  developed  agriculture,  manufactures,  and  com- 
merce; would  have  cleared,  drained,  and  fertilized  the 
country,  and  built  towns ;  would  have  improved  the  looms, 
brought  in  plows,  steam-engines,  printing  presses,  machines, 
and  the  thousand  processes  and  appliances  by  which  the  com- 
fort, progress,  and  usefulness  of  mankind  are  secured.  But, 
alas!  D is  aliter  visum. 

"  Freighted  with  curse3  was  the  bark  that  bore 

The  spoilers  of  the  West  to  Guinea's  shore  ; 

Heavy  with  groans  of  anguish  blew  the  gales 

That  swelled  that  fatal  bark's  returning  sails : 

Loud  and  perpetual  o'er  the  Atlantic's  waves, 

For  guilty  ages,  rolled  the  tide  of  slaves ; 

A  tide  that  knew  no  fall,  no  turn,  no  rest — 

Constant  as  day  and  night  from  East  to  West, 

Still  widening,  deepening,  swelling  in  its  course 

With  boundless  ruin  and  resistless  force." — Mostgoitert. 


ISO?.]  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  87 

15ut  although,  amid  the  violent  shocks  of  those  changes  and 
d:.-a-ters  to  which  the  natives  of  this  outraged  land  have  been 
subject,  their  knowledge  of  the  elegant  arts,  brought  from  the 
East,  declined,  they  never  entirely  lost  the  necessary  arts  of 
life.  They  still  understand  the  workmanship  of  iron,  and,  in 
■orae  sections  of  the  country,  of  gold.  The  loom  and  the  forge 
arc  in  constant  use  among  them.  In  remote  regions,  where 
they  have  no  intercourse  with  Europeans,  they  raise  large 
herds  of  cattle  and  innumerable  sheep  and  goats ;  capture  and 
train  horses,  build  well-laid-out  towns,  cultivate  extensive 
fields,  and  manufacture  earthenware  and  woolen  and  cotton 
cloths.  Commander  Foote  says :  "  The  Xegro  arts  are  respect- 
able, and  would  have  been  more  so  had  not  disturbance  and 
waste  come  with  the  slave-trade."* 

And  in  our  own  times,  on  the  "West  Coast  of  Africa,  a 
native  development  of  literature  has  been  brought  to  light  of 
penuine  home-growth.  The  Yey  people,  residing  half  way 
between  Sierra  Leone  and  Cape  Mesurado,  have  within  the 
last  thirty  years  invented  a  syllabic  alphabet,  with  which 
they  are  now  writing  their  own  language,  and  by  which  they 
are  maintaining  among  themselves  an  extensive  epistolary 
correspondence  In  1S49  the  Church  Missionary  Society  in  Lon- 
don, having  heard  of  this  invention,  authorized  their  mission- 
ary, Rev.  S.  AY.  Koelle,  to  investigate  the  subject.  Mr.  Koelle 
traveled  into  the  interior,  and  brought  away  three  manuscripts, 
with  translations.  The  symbols  are  phonetic,  and  constitute  a 
*yllabarium,  not  an  alphabet;  they  are  nearly  two  hundred 
in  number.  They  have  been  learned  so  generally  that  Vey 
boys  in  Monrovia  frequently  receive  communications  from 
their  friends  in  the  Yey  country  to  which  they  readily  re- 
*l>ond.  The  Church  Missionary  Society  have  had  a  font  of 
type  cast  in  this  new  character,  and  several  little  tracts 
have  been  printed  and  circulated  among  the  tribe.  The 
principal  inventor  of  this  alphabet  is  now  dead;  but  it  is 
supposed  that  he  died  in  the  Christian  faith,  having  ac- 
quired 6ome  knowledge  of  the  way  of  salvation  through  the 
medium  of  this  character  of  his  own  invention.!  Dr.  Wilson 
*ays : 

*  Africa  and  the  American  Flag,"  p.  52. 

\  Wilson's  "Western  Africa,"  p.  95,  and  "  Princeton  Review  for  July  1858,"p.4SS. 
3 


88  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

This  invention  is  one  of  the  most  remarkable  achievements  of  this 
or  auy  other  age,  and  is  itself  enough  to  silence  forever  the  cavils 
and  sneers  of  those  who  think  so  contemptuously  of  the  intellectual 
endowments  of  the  African  race. 

Though  "  the  idea  of  commun dating  thoughts  in  -writing 
was  probably  suggested  by  the  use  of  Arabic  among  the 
Mandingoes,"  yet  the  invention  was  properly  original,  showing 
the  existence  of  genius  in  the  native  African  who  has  never 
been  in  foreign  slavery,  and  proves  that  he  carries  in  his  bosocu 
germs  of  intellectual  development  and  self-elevation,  which 
would  have  enabled  him  to  advance  regularly  in  the  path  of 
progress  had  it  not  been  for  the  blighting  influence  of  the 
6lave-trade. 

]STow  are  we  to  believe  that  such  a  people  have  been  doomed, 
by  the  terms  of  any  curse,  to  be  the  "servant  of  servants,"  as 
some  upholders  of  Xegro  slavery  have  taught?  'SYould  it  not 
have  been  a  very  singular  theory  that  a  people  destined  to  serv- 
itude should  begin,  the  very  first  thing,  as  we  have  endeavored 
to  show,  to  found  "  great  cities,"  organize  kingdoms,  and 
establish  rule — putting  up  structures  which  have  come  down 
to  this  day  as  a  witness  to  their  superiority  over  all  their  con- 
temporaries— and  that,  by  a  Providential  decree,  the  people 
whom  they  had  been  fated  to  serve  should  be  held  in  bondage 
by  them  four  hundred  years  ? 

The  remarkable  enterprise  of  the  Cushite  hero,  Nimrod  ;  his 
establishment  of  imperial  power,  as  an  advance  on  patriarchal 
government ;  the  strength  of  the  Egypt  of  Mizraim,  and  its 
long  domination  over  the  house  of  Israel ;  and  the  evidence  which 
now  and  then  appears,  that  even  Phut  (who  is  the  obscurest  in  his 
fortunes  of  all  the  Hamite  race)  maintained  a  relation  to  the  de- 
scendants of  Shem  which  was  far  from  servile  or  subject;  do  all 
clearly  tend  to  limit  the  application  of  Xoah's  maledictory  prophecy 
to  the  precise  terms  in  which  it  was  indited  :  "  Cursed  be  Canaan  ; 
a  servant  of  servants  shall  he"  (not  Cush,  not  Mizraim,  not  Phut, 
but  he)  "  be  to  his  brethren."  If  we  then  confine  the  imprecation 
to  Canaan,  we  can  without  difficulty  trace  its  accomplishment  in 
the  subjugation  of  the  tribes  which  issued  from  him  to  the  children 
of  Israel  from  the  time  of  Joshua  to  that  of  David.  Here  would 
be  verified  Canaan's  servile  relation  to  Shem  ;  and  when  imperial 
Home  finally  wrested  the  scepter  from  Judah,  and,  "  dwelling  in  the 
tents  of  Shem,"  occupied  the  East  and  whatever  remnants  of  Canaan 
were  left  in  it,  would  not  this  accomplish  that  further  prediction 
that  Japheth,  too,  should  be  lord  of  Canaan,  and  that  (as  it  would 


1809.]  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  89 

aerm  to  be  tacitly  implied)  mediately,  through  his  occupancy  of 
Uio  touts  of  Shem  ?  * 

A  vigorous  writer  in  the  "  Princeton  Review  "  has  the  fol- 
lowing : 

The  Ethiopian  race,  from  whom  the  modern  Negro  or  African 
<ock  are  undoubtedly  descended,  can  claim  as  early  a  history,  with 
the  exception  of  the  Jews,f  as  any  living  people  on  the  face  of  the 
earth.  History,  as  well  as  the  monumental  discoveries,  gives  them 
h  place  in  ancient  history  as  far  back  as  Egypt  herself,  if  not  far- 
ther. But  what  has  become  of  the  conremporaneous  nations  of 
antiquity,  as  well  as  others  of  much  later  origin  ?  Where  are  the 
Numidians,  Mauritaniaus,  and  other  powerful  names,  who  once 
held  sway  over  all  Northern  Africa !  They  have  been  swept  away 
from  the  earth,  or  dwindled  down  to  a  handful  of  modern  Copts 
tod  Berbers  of  doubtful  descent. 

The  Ethiopian,  or  African  race,  on  the  other  hand,  though  they 
have  long  since  lost  all  the  civilization  which  once  existed  on  the 
Upper  Nile,  have,  nevertheless,  continued  to  increase  and  multiply, 
until  they  are  now,  with  the  exception  of  the  Chinese,  the  largest 
tingle  family  of  men  on  the  face  of  the  earth.  They  have  extended 
themselves  in  every  direction  over  that  great  continent,  from  the 
southern  borders  of  the  Great  Sahara  to  the  Cape  of  Good  Hope,  and 
trom  the  Atlantic  to  the  Indian  Ocean,  and  are  thus  constituted  mas- 
ters of  at  least  three  fourths  of  the  habitable  portions  of  this  great 
v"iitinent.  And  this  progress  has  been  made,  be  it  remembered, 
in  despite  of  the  prevalence  of  the  foreign  slave-trade,  which  has 
carried  oft*  so  many  of  their  people  ;  of  the  ceaseless  internal  lends 
and  wars  that  have  been  waged  among  themselves  ;  and  of  a  con- 
»wracy,  as  it  were,  among  all  surrounding  nations,  to  trample  out 
their  national  existence.  Surely  their  history  is  a  remarkable  one  ; 
but  sot  more  so,  perhaps,  than  is  foreshadowed  in  the  prophecies 
v\  the  Old  Testament  Scriptures.  God  has  watched  over  and  pre- 
served these  people  through  all  the  vicissitudes  of  their  unwritten 
history,  and  no  doubt  for  some  great  purpose  of  mercy. toward 
theiu,  as  well  as  for  the  display  of  the  glory  of  his  own  grace  and 
providence ;  and  we  may  expect  to  have  a  full  revelation  of  this 
purpose  and  glory  as  soon  as  the  everlasting  Gospel  is  made  known 

10  these  benighted  millions.^ 

One  palpable  reason  may  be  assigned  why  the  Ethiopian  race 
has  continued  to  exist  under  the  most  adverse  circumstances, 
while  other  races  and  tribes  have  perished  from  the  earth ; 

11  is  this:  they  have  never  been  a  blood-Hardy  or  avaricious 
}*o]dc.  From  the  beginning  of  their  history  to  the  present 
lutie  their  work  has  been  constructive,  except  when  they  have 

*  Dr.  Peter  Ilolmcs,  Oxford,  England. 

\  The  Jews  not  excepted.     Where  were  they  when  the  Pyramids  were  built  ? 

J  "Princeton  Kevicw,  Ju'y  1858,"  pp.  448,  4-19. 


90  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [January, 

been  stimulated  to  wasting  wars  by  the  covetous  foreigner. 
They  have  built  up  in  Asia,  Africa,  and  America.  They  have 
not  delighted  in  despoiling  and  oppressing  others.  The  nations 
enumerated  by  the  reviewer  just  quoted,  and  others  besides 
them — all  warlike  and  fighting  nations — have  passed  away  or 
dwindled  into  utter  insignificance.  They  seem  to  have  been  con- 
sumed by  their  own  fierce  internal  passions.  The  Ethiopians, 
though  brave  and  powerful,  were  not  a  fighting  people,  that  is, 
were  not  fond  of  fighting  for  the  sake  of  humbling  and  im- 
poverishing other  people.  Every  reader  of  history  will  remem- 
ber the  straightforward,  brave,  and  truly  Christian  answer 
returned  by  the  Kiug  of  the  Ethiopians  to  Cambyses,  who  was 
contemplating  an  invasion  of  Ethiopia,  as  recorded  by  Herod- 
otus. For  the  sake  of  those  who  may  not  have  access  to  that 
work  we  reproduce  the  narrative  here.  About  five  hundred 
years  before  Christ,  Cambyses,  the  great  Persian  warrior, 
while  invading  Egypt,  planned  an  expedition  against  the 
Ethiopians  ;  but  before  proceeding  upon  the  belligerent  enter- 
prises he  sent 

"  Spies  in  the  first  instance,  who  were  to  see  the  table  of  the  sun, 
which  was  said  to  exist  among  the  Ethiopians,  and  besides,  to 
explore  other  things,  and,  to  cover  their  design,  they  were  to  carry 
presents  to  the  King.  .  .  .  When  the  messengers  of  Cambyses 
arrived  among  the  Ethiopians  they  gave  the  preseuts  to  the  King, 
and  addressed  him  as  follows:  "Cambyses,  King  of  the  Persians, 
desirous  of  becoming  your  friend  and  ally,  has  sent  us,  bidding  us 
confer  with  you,  and  he  presents  you  with  these  gifts,  which  are 
such  as  he  himself  most  delights  in." 

But  the  Ethiopian  knowing  that  they  came  as  spies,  spoke 
thus  to  them : 

"Neither  lias  the  King  of  Persia  sent  you  with  these  presents  to 
me  because  he  valued  my  alliance,  nor  do  you  speak  the  truth, 
for  you  are  come  as  spies  of  my  kingdom.  Nor  is  he  a  just  man  : 
for  If  he  were  just  he  would  not  desire  any  other  territory  than 
his  own ;  nor  would  he  reduce  people  into  servitude  who  have 
done  him  no  injury.  However,  give  him  this  bow,  and  say  these 
words  to  him:  'The  King  of  the  Ethiopians  advises  the  Kim;  of 
the  Persians,  when  the  Persians  can  thus  easily  draw  a  bow 
of  this  size,  then  to  make  war  on  the  Maerobian  Ethiopians  with 
more  numerous  forces;  but  until  that  time  let  him  thank  the  gods, 
who  have  not  inspired  the  sons  of  the  Ethiopiaus  witli  the  desire 
of  adding  another  land  to  their  own.'"* 

*  Herodotus,  iii,  17-22. 


18G9.I  The  Negro  in  Ancient  Histoid :  91 

Arc  these  a  people,  with  such  remarkable  antecedents,  and 
iu  the  whole  of  whose  history  the  hand  of  God  is  so  plainly 
mtii,  to  be  treated  with  the  contempt  which  they  usually 
gaffer  in  the  lands  of  their' bondage  ?  When  we  notice  the 
loornfal  indifference  with  which  the  Xegro  is  spoken  of  by 
certain  politicians  in  America,  we  fancy  that  the  attitude  of 
I'liaraoh  and  the  aristocratic  Egyptians  must  have  been  pre- 
cisely similar  toward  the  Jews.  We  fancy  we  see  one  of  the 
magicians  in  council,  after  the  first  Visit  of  Moses  demanding 
the  release  of  the  Israelites,  rising  up  with  indignation  and 
pouring  out  a  torrent  of  scornful  invective  such  as  any  rabid 
anti-Negro  politician  might  now  indulge  in. 

"What  privileges  are  those  that  these  degraded  llebrews  are 
craving?  What,  are  they?  Are  they  not  slaves  and  the  de- 
scendants of  slaves?  What  have  they  or  their  ancestors  ever 
done  ?  What  can  they  do  ?  They  did  not  come  hither  of  their 
own  accord.  The  first  of  them  was  brought  to  this  country  a 
slave,  sold  to  us  by  his  own  brethren.  Others  followed  him, 
refugees  from  the  famine  of  an  impoverished  country.  What 
d'»  they  know  about  managing  liberty  or  controlling  themselves? 
They  are  idle ;  they  are  idle.  Divert  their  attention  from  their 
idle  dreams  by  additional  labor  and  more  exacting  tasks. 

But  what  have  the  ancestors  of  Xegroes  ever  done  ?  Let 
Professor  Eawlinson  answer,  as  a  summing  up  of  our  discus- 
sion.    Says  the  learned  Professor: 

For  the  last  three  thousand  years  the  world  has  been  mainly 
indebted  for  its  advancement  to  the  Semitic  and  Indo-European 
races ;  but  it  teas  otherwise  in  the  first  ages.  Egypt  and 
Babylon,  Mizraim  and  Nimrod — both  descendants  of  Ham — 
led  the  way,  and  acted  as  the  pioneers  of  mankind  in  the 
various  untrodden  fields  of  art,  literature,  and  science.  Alpha- 
betic writing,. astronomy,  history,  chronology,  architecture,  plastic 
art,  sculpture,  navigation,  agriculture,  textile  industry,  seem 
all  of  them  to  have  had  their  origin  in  one  or  other  of  these 
two  countries.  The  beginnings  may  have  been  often  humble 
enough.  We  may  laugh  at  the  rude  picture-writing,  the  uncouth 
brick  pyramid,  the  coarse  fabric,  the  homely  and  Ul-shapen  instru- 
ments, as  they  present  themselves  to  our  notice  in  the  remains  of 
these  ancient  nations  ;  but  they  are  really  worthier  of  our  admira- 
tion than  of  our  ridicule.  The  inventors"  of  any  art  are  among  the 
greatest  benefactors  of  their  race,  and  mankind"  at  the  present  day 
his  under  infinite  obligations  to  the  genius  of  these  early  ages  * 

*  "Five  Great  Monarchies,"  vol.  i,  pp.  lb,  76. 


92  The  Negro  in  Ancient  History.  [Januarv, 

There  are  now,  probably,  few  thoughtful  and  cultivated  men 
in  the  United  States  who  are  prepared  to  advocate  the  appli- 
cation of  the  curse  of  Noah  to  all  the  descendants  of  Hani. 
The  experience  of  the  last  eight  years  must  have  convinced 
the  most  ardent  theorizer  on  the  subject.  Facts  have  not 
borne  out  their  theory  and  predictions  concerning  the  race. 
The  Lord  by  his  outstretched  arm  has  dashed  their  syllogisms 
to  atoms,  scattered  their  dogmas  to  the  winds,  detected  the 
partiality  and  exaggerating  tendency  of  their  method,  and 
shown  the  injustice  of  that  heartless  philosophy  and  that  un- 
relenting theology  which  consigned  a  whole  race  of  men  to 
hopeless  and  interminable  servitude. 

It  is  difficult,  nevertheless,  to  understand  how,  with  the 
history  of  the  past  accessible,  the  facts  of  the  present  before 
their  eyes,  and  the  prospect  of  a  clouded  future,  or  uu vailed 
only  to  disclose  the  indefinite  numerical  increase  of  Europians 
in  the  land,  the  blacks  of  the  United  States  can  hope  for  any 
distinct,  appreciable  influence  in  the  country.  We  cannot 
perceive  on  what  grounds  the  most  sanguine  among  their 
friends  can  suppose  that  there  will  be  so  decisive  a  revolution 
of  popular  feeling  in  favor  of  their  proteges  as  to  make  them 
at  once  the  political  and  social  equals  of  their  former  masters. 
Legislation  cannot  secure  them  this  equality  in  the  United 
States  any  more  than  it  has  secured  it  for  the  blacks  in  the 
"West  Indies.  During  the  time  of  slavery  every  thing  in  the 
laws,  in  the  customs,  in  the  education  of  the  people  was  con- 
trived with  the  single  view  of  degrading  the  Negro  in  his 
own  estimation  and  that  of  others.  Now  is  it  possible  to 
change  in  a  day  the  habits  and  character  which  centuries  of 
oppression  have  entailed?  We  think  not.  More  than  one 
generation,  it  appears  to  us,  must  pass  away  before  the  full 
effect  of  education,  enlightenment,  and  social  improvement 
will  be  visible  among  the  blacks.  Meanwhile  they  are  being 
gradually  absorbed  by  the  Caucasian;  and  before  their  social 
equality  comes  to  be  conceded  they  will  have  lost  their  identity 
altogether,  a  result,  in  our  opinion,  extremely  undesirable,  as 
we  believe  that,  as  Negroes,  they  might  accomplish  a  great 
work  which  others  cannot  perform.  But  even  if  they  should 
not  puss  away  in  the  mighty  embrace  of  their  numerous  white 
neighbors;  grant  that  they  could  continue  to  live  in  the  land, 


1869 J  The  Ntgro  in  Ancient  History.  93 

.»  distinct  people,  with  the  marked  peculiarities  they  possess, 
having  the  same  color  and  hair,  badges  of  a  former  thraldom 
—is  it  to  be  supposed  that  they  can  ever  overtake  a  people 
who  t-o  largely  outnumber  them,  and  a  large  proportion  of 
whom  are  endowed  with  wealth,  leisure,  and  the  habits  and 
means  of  study  and  self-improvement?  If  they  improve  in 
culture  and  training,  as  in  time  they  no  doubt  will,  and  become 
intelligent  and  educated,  there  may  rise  up  individuals  among 
them,  here  and  there,  who  will  be  respected  and  honored  by 
the  whites  ;  but  it  is  plain  that,  as  a  class,  their  inferiority  will 
never  cease  until  they  cease  to  be  a  distinct  people,  possessing 
jK-euliarities  which  suggest  antecedents  of  servility  and  degra- 
dation. 

"We  pen  these  lines  with  the  most  solemn  feelings — grieved 
that  so  many  strong,  intelligent,  and  energetic  black  men 
ihonld  be  wasting  time  and  labor  in  a  fruitless  contest,  which, 
expended  in  the  primitive  land  of  their  fathers — a  land  that  so 
much  needs  them — would  produce  in  a  comparatively  short 
time  results  of  incalculable  importance.  But  what  can  we 
do!  Occupying  this  distant  stand-point — an  area  of  ]S~egro 
freedom  and  a  scene  for  untrammeled  growth  and  development, 
hut  a  wide  and  ever-expanding  field  for  benevolent  effort ;  an 
outlying  or  surrounding  wilderness  to  be  reclaimed  ;  barbarism 
«f  ages  to  be  brought  over  to  Christian  life — we  can  only 
repeat  with  undiminished  earnestness  the  wish  we  have 
frequently  expressed  elsewhere,  that  the  eyes  of  the  blacks  may 
U  opened  to  discern  their  true  mission  and  d-estiny ;  that, 
making  their  escape  from  the  house  of  bondage,  they  may 
9dalce  themselves  to  their  ancestral  home,  and  assist  in  con- 
liructing  a  Christian  African  empire.  For  we  believe  that 
**  descendants  of  Ham  had  a  share,  as  the  most  prominent 
actora  on  the  scene,  in  the  founding  of  cities  and  in  the  organ- 
ization of  government,  so  members  of  the  same  family,  devel- 
oped  under  different  circumstances,  will  have  an  important 
I'^rt  in  the  closing  of  the  great  drama. 

"Time's  noblest  offspring  is  the  last." 


94:  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.    [January, 


Akt.  VI.— GEOLOGICAL  EVIDENCES  OF   THE 
ANTIQUITY  OF  MAN. 

Kotkes  Preliminaires  sur  les  Fouilles,  Executer  sous  les  Auspices  du  Gouvernement 
Beige,  dans  hs  Cavernes,  de  la  Belgigue.  Par  M.  Edouard  Dcfoxt.  Tomes  I 
and  II.     Bruielies.     1S67. 

Bulb  tin  de  la  Societe  des  Sciences  Katurelles  de  Neuchatel.  From  1858  to  1863. 
NeuchateL 

Bulletin  de  V  Academic  Royah,  des  Sciences,  etc.,  de  Belgique.     1866. 

Zoologie  et  Paleontologie  Generates.  Xouvelles  Recherches,  sur  les  Animaux,  Vertebrates, 
dont  o-u  trouve,  les  ossements  Enfonis,  dan  le  sol,  et  sur  leur  Comparison  avec  les 
espies  actuellement  Existants.     4to.,  pp.  600.     Plates.     Paris.     186S. 

Habitations  Lacustres  des  Temps  Anciens  et  Mod  ernes.  Par  Fredeic  Troyox. 
Lausanne.     1860. 

M.  BoucntR  de  Perthes:  1.  Des  Outils  de  Pierre.  Pp.48.  Paris.  1S65.  2.  De 
la  Machoire  Humaine  de  Moulin  Quignon.     Pp.172.     Paris.     1864. 

Report  upon  the  Physics  and  Hydraulics  of  the  Mississippi  River,  etc.,  etc.  By  Capt. 
A.  A.  Humphreys  and  Lieut.  H.  L.  Abbott,  Corps  of  Topographical  Euginee'rs, 
TJ.  S.  A.     Philadelphia.     1861. 

NlLSOX.  The  Primitive  Inhabitants  of  Scandinavia.  Third  Edition.  "With  an  In- 
troduction by  Sir  John  Lubbock,  Bart.,  F.R.S.  London:  Longmans,  Green,  & 
Co.     1868. 

Geological  Evidences  of  the  Antiquity  of  Man,  etc.  By  Sir  Charles  Lyell,  F.R.S. 
Philadelphia.     1S63. 

Slnce  the  mistakes  of  Spallanzairi  in  relation  to  the  bones 
found  in  the  osseous  breccias  of  Cerigo,  and  since  the  homo 
diluvii  testis  of  Scheuzer  was  announced  and  subsequently 
proved,  by  Cuvier,  to  be  only  part  of  a  salamander,  there 
has  been  a  proneness  to  identify,  as  those  of  man,  the  frag- 
mentary remains  of  animals  so  often  found  in  the  upper 
stratified  rocks.  One  after  another  of  such  discoveries  were 
proclaimed,  and  in  turn  discredited;  but  in  the  past  few  years 
the  tide  has  been  turned,  and  now  the  evidences  of  '•prehistoric 
man"  have  so  multiplied,  as  to  constitute  a  new  and  interest- 
ing chapter  alike  in  Geology  and  Archaeology. 

Tiius  far  relics  of  man  have  been  confined  to  those  super- 
ficial formations  on  the  earth's  surface  in  or  above  the  newest 
tertiary  or  pleistocene,  more  particularly  in  the  post-pliocene, 
or  quaternary.     These  from  below  upward  consist  of: 

1.  Upper  tertiary  or  pleistocene,  composed  of  the  boulder 
and  glacial  drift,  overspreading  parts  of  the  continents,  in- 
cluding, probably,  some  cave  deposits.  By  the  drift  is  meant 
the  gravel,  sand,  clay,  and  loose  stones,  covering,  like  a 
mantle,  many  parts  of  the  earth's  surface,  especially  in  the 


1  *69.)       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  95 

leiuiKM-ate  zones.    Wherever  found  it  is  not  stratified,  as  a  rule, 
h*\  U  mixed  confusedly.    In  transporting  it  rivers  had  no  agency. 

8.  Quaternary,  post-pliocene,  or  Champlain  formations. 
These  consist  of  ancient  sea  and  lake  beaches,  composed  of 
grovel,  sand,  and  clay  stratified,  and  the  terraces,  which  at 
different  levels  flank  the  sides  of  our  valleys,  and  which  also 
extend  frequently  into  the  caverns  that  penetrate  their  slopes. 
Tlii.s  formation  contains  the  shells  of  living  species,— sometimes 
of  Buch  as  exist  now,  only  in  other  localities, — and  also  the  re- 
mains of  various  extinct  land  animals. 

3.  Recent  {diluvium.)  This  is  composed  of  the  immediate 
clay*,  peat  beds,  and  soils  on  the  surface,  including  the  alluvium 
along  the  banks  of  rivers,  and  the  existing  shores  of  our  lakes 
and  seas,  which  contain  normally  none  but  the  remains  of  liv- 
ing species,  whether  aquatic  or  terrestrial. 

Such  are  the  three  formations  which  claim  our  attention,  since 
they  alone  are  held  to  have  yielded  vestiges  of  the  human  race. 

We  now  proceed  to  enumerate,  and  subsequently  to  examine, 
the  most  striking  and  authentic  facts  brought  to  light  by  the 
recent  labors  of  geologists  touching  the  antiquity  of  man. 
They  may,  for  convenience,  be  grouped  in  the  following  man 
ner,  as  relating  to : 

1.  Lacustrine  habitations  of  Central  and  Southern  Europe. 

2.  "Kjoekenmiddings,"  or  "kitchen  refuse  heaps"  of  the 
coasts  of  Denmark  and  Norway  in  Europe,  and  the  Atlantic 
coast  of  North  America. 

3.  Deltas,  as  those  of  the  Nile,  Po,  Ganges,  and  Mississippi. 

4.  Cave  deposits,  in  various  parts  of  Europe. 

5.  Remains  found  in  the  peat,  clay,  and  gravel-beds,  and  ter- 
races of  various  parts  of  the  world. 

1.  Lacustrine  habitations.  It  has  been  long  known  to  the 
l-eople  of  the  Swiss  lakes,  that  there  existed  in  many  of  them 
at.cient  posts  or  piles,  which,  while  they  never  reached  up  to 
the  surface  of  the  water,  often  rose  some  distance  above  the 
Wtom,  so  as  to  be  visible  while  passing  over  them  in  a  boat. 
They  were  especially  obnoxious  to  fishermen,  who  often  in- 
jured their  nets  on  them.  The  most  ancient  local  history  did 
»»"t  mention  them;  and  except  in  a  traditional  belief,*  which 
lingers  among  the  people,  that  they  were  once  inhabited  by  a 

*  Troyon,  Habitations  Lacustres,  p.  123. 


96  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.    [January, 

race  of  men  who  built  on  the  water  to  protect  themselves  from 
wild  beasts,  nothing  was  known  of  them.  Occasionally  from 
the  bottom  of  some  lake,  especially  in  the  vicinity  of  the  piles, 
the  large  horns  of  deer,  and  sometimes  certain  strange  utensils, 
would  be  recovered,  as  from  Lake  Zurich  in  1829,  and  still 
later,  from  Lake  Bienne.*  But  little  was  thought  of  these 
matters  until,  in  1853-54,  during  the  execution  of  certain 
works  at  Meilen,  on  Lake  Zurich,  some  piles  in  a  half  decom- 
posed state  were  extracted  from  the  mud,  and  with  them  some 
rude,  black  pottery,  moulded  simply  with  the  hand,  without 
the  aid  of  the  wheel,  and  certain  rude  utensils;  all  of  which 
atfracted  the  attention  of  a  Mr.  Ferdinand  Keller,  who  com- 
municated his  observations'  to  the  Antiquarian  Society  of 
Zurich. 

This  excited  similar  observations  elsewhere,  until,  in  the  last 
few  years,  nearly  all  the  lakes  in  Switzerland  and  Central 
Europe,  in  Italy  and  the  British  Isles,  have  been  explored,  with 
results  which,  whatever  may  be  said  of  them,  in  relation  to  the 
question  more  immediately  before  us,  are  such  as  must  surprise 
and  gratify  every  lover  of  science.  After  Keller's  discovery, 
as  already  remarked,  others -followed,  as  by  MM.  Troyon  at 
Nenchatel,  Portalez-Sandoz  at  Lance,  Dr.  Clement  at  St. 
Aubin,  Rochat  at  Y verdon,  Rey  and  de  Vevey  at  Estavayer, 
Col.  Schwab  at  Bienne,  Uhlman  at  Moosseedorf,  Forel  at  Lake 
Geneva,  Uhlberg  at  Zug,  Baron  Despine  at  Lake  Bourget, 
Re  von  at  Lake  Annecy,  Strobel  and  Pigorini  in  the  Grand 
Duchy  of  Parma,  and  de  Silber  at  Peschiera,  Lake  Garda, 
Italy,  not  to  mention  a  host  of  other  persons  and  places,  until, 
up  to  this  date,  enough  lake  habitations  have  been  discovered 
to  accommodate  a  population,  perhaps,  of  more  "than  100,000 
inhabitants.  At  the  station  of  Unteruhldingen,  in  one  of  the 
Swiss  lakes,  more  than  10,000  piles  have  been  found,  and 
later  still,  M.  Lohle  has  discovered,  at  the  Station  of  Wangen, 
Lake  Constance,  40,000.f 

They  occur  in  general  at  short  distances  from  the  shore,  and 
are  called  by  the  Germans  "Pfahlbaukn"  by  the  French 
"Tejwvriercs"  in  Ireland  "Crannogcs"  by  the  Italians  hiPala- 

*  M.  Desor,  Smithsonian  Report.     18G7. 

|  A  most  excellent  paper  on  "  Pile-buildings,"  especially  as  they  occur  in  Bavaria, 
is  that  of  M.  Wagnor,  entitled,  "Pfahllauttn  in  Bayeru,''  in  "  SituwjsbrrichU  der 
l~jni>jl.  Bajftra.     Akadcmie  der  Wisswchoft  zu  iliinchen.     1BGG.     II,  Htfl  -L 


1  500.1       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  97 

JU*,n  and  by  the  English  "Pile-buildings."  The  Italian 
name  "Palafite"  has  found  most  favor.  They  consist  in  a 
nninber  of  wooden  piles,  or  trunks,  (sometimes  split,)  of  the 
fir,  birch,  or  oak,  varying  much  in  size,  and  were  originally 
cither  sharpened  at  one  end  and  driven  into  the  mud  at  the 
bottom  of  the  lake,  or  if  this  was  not  possible,  they  were  set 
op  jukI  stones  cast  into  the  water  about  them  in  heaps,  until  a 
wffieient  number  were  secured  on  which  to  build.  The  latter 
kind  of  a  palafite  the  Germans  call  a  "  Steinberg  P  The  stones 
were  brought  in  a  canoe,  consisting  of  the  trunk  of  a  tree  hol- 
lowed  out,  called  a  "pirogue."  Several  have  been  recovered 
from  the  Swiss  lakes  in  a  tolerable  state  of  preservation,  as  at 
Robenhansen.  One,  fifty  feet  long  and  three  or  four  feet  wide, 
was  discovered  in  Lake  Bienne,  near  St.  Pierre,  still  loaded 
with  stones,  where  it  had  been  sunk.  The  piles  are  often  a 
foot  in  diameter,  and  in  many  cases  still  bear  the  marks  of  the 
Bint  or  other  implements  by  which  they  were  prepared.  In 
the  majority  of  cases  they  have  rotted  off  to  the  level  of  the 
bottom ;  but  where  they  have  not,  the  upper  end  occasionally 
bears  the  marks  of  the  ax.  These  latter  are  generally  at  a 
oniform  depth  below  the  surface  of  the  water,  which  fact  sug- 
gests important  general  changes  in  the  water  level  of  the  lakes 
where  the  piles  exist  since  they  were  placed  in  position.  The 
palafites  were  connected  with  the  shore  by  means  of  light 
bridges,  as  the  remains  testify. 

On  examining  the  deposits  which  exist  amid  the  piles,  and 
which  vary  in  thickness  from  one  to  six  feet,  there  have  been  dis- 
covered flint  chips,  hatchets,  hammers,  spear-heads,  and  knives 
W  ^tone ;  knives,  hatchets,  needles,  hair-pins,  fish-hooks,  etc.,  in 
}*>nc  and  horn;  pottery  of  many  kinds,  chisels,  {Av.vernier,) 
knives,  hatchets,  reaping-hooks,  arms  of  various  kinds,  and  orna- 
ments, as  bracelets,  amulets,  and  ear-rings,  in  bronze  and  iron. 
( Occasionally  other  metals  have  been  found,  as,  for  example,  a 
bar  of  tin  at  Estavayer.  Also  beads  of  glass  and  of  amber. 
The  same  deposits  contain  bones  of  various  animals,  wild  and 
domestic,  both  living  and  extinct,  in  Middle  and  Southern 
Europe.  Hearth-stones,  baked  clay  from  their  fire-places, 
beds  of  reeds,  straw  and  bark  from  the  roofs  of  their  dwell- 
ings, heaps  of  moss  and  leaves  once  employed  as  beds;  objects 
'■»  domestic   industry,   as   spindles,    skeins   of   thread,    webs, 


I 


98  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

tissues,  nets,  small  baskets  like  those  figured  on  Egyptian 
tombs,  cloth,  (as  at  Wangen,  Lake  Constance ;)  remains  of 
fruits,  as  of  apples,  cherries,  beech-nuts,  seeds  of  strawberry, 
raspberry,  charred  wheat,  and  millet;*  and  even  bread  in  a 
charred  state,  as  at  Kobenhausen,  in  Lake  Pfeifkon,  and  many 
other  objects,  have  been  obtained.  Besides  these,  manufac- 
tories of  stone  implements  have  been  discovered,  as  at  Moossee- 
dorf,  Obermeilen,  and  Concise;  and  foundries  for  articles  in 
bronze,  as  at  Echallen,  Canton  ofVaud,  and  Dovaine,  near 
Thonon.  At  Morges  a  mould  for  bronze  hatchets  was  found. 
Rutemeyer  recognized  among  the  bones  recovered  sixty-six 
different  species  of  vertebrate  animals,  but  no  cats  nor 
chickens.  Human  skeletons,  or  portions  of  them,  have  been 
found,  as  at  Auvernier.  Meilen,  and  Tene.  The  skulls 
resemble  those  of  the  Laplanders  and  Fins  of  to-day. t 

Not  only  have  the  means  been  thus  accumulated  for  recon- 
structing, in  some  measure,  the  civil  and  domestic  life  of  a 
people  nearly  lost  to  history,  but  certain  stages  in  the  progress 
of  their  civilization  have  been  made  out  from  the  characters 
of  the  remains  discovered.  The  principal  stages,  or  periods, 
as  they*  are  called,  are  three  in  number.  The  earliest  has 
been  named  the  stone  period,  from  the  predominance  of  stone 
implements ;  the  second  has  been  called  the  bronze,  and  the 
late&t  the  iron,  period.  Beyond  this  certain  facts  have  come 
to  light  which  enable  us,  it  is  believed,  to  estimate,  at  least 
approximately,  the  time  which  has  elapsed  since  the  oldest 
of  the  pile  buildings  were  constructed.  In  the  valley  of  the 
Orbe,  south  of  the  town  of  Yvcrdon,  eight  hundred  meters 
(2,500  feet)  from  the  shore  of  the  lake,  are  found  the  remains 
of  the  ancient  Gallo-Roman  city  of  Eburodunum.  Through- 
out this  whole  extent  (2,500  feet)  no  ruins  are  found.  It  is 
supposed  the  waves  washed  the  Castrum  Eburodunense  about 
eighteen  hundred  or  two  thousand  years  ago.  Since  then  the 
two  thousand  live  hundred  feet  has  been  filled  in  between  the 
ruins   and   the   present  shore.     One   thousand   meters  (more 

*  If.  Lohle  has  discovered  in  Lake  Constance  a  grain  store-house,  containing 
about  one  hundred  measures  of  wheat  nnd  barley,  both  shelled  aud  in  the  ear. 

\  Some  of  these  pile  stations  bare  been  naturally  recovered  from  the  lakes,  fl3 
at  Zurich,  Geneva,  and  near  Yverdon,  and  at  the  bridgo  of  Thielle,  where  the  riv«.-r 
enters  Lake  Biennc.  The  cities  of  Zurich  and  Gonova  stand  on  the  sites  of 
ancient  "  palafites." 


IS69J      Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  99 

than  3000  feet)  beyond  the  "ruins,  at  the  foot  of  the  hill 
Chimbkra,  piles  have  been  discovered.  According  to  this, 
the  lake  has  receded  from  the  original  shore  at  the  foot 
>.•(  the  hill  more  than  six  thousand  feet,  and  if  always  at  the 
rate  it  has  receded  from  the  ruins,  it  would  give  to  the  buried 
j.alatite  more  than  two  thousand  years  before  the  Christian 
era. 

M.  Gillieron,  from  a  study  of  the  stone  station  at  the  bridge 
of  Thielle,  near  the  entrance  of  that  river  into  Lake  Bienne, 
by  a  similar  process  makes  out  seven  thousand  five  hundred 
years  as  its  probable  age.  M.  Morlot,*  from  certain  observa- 
tions made  on  the  gravel  cones  at  Villeneuve,  near  the  mouth 
<•:*  the  Tiniere,  in  which  human  remains  were  discovered, 
calculates  they  must  be  from  seven  thousand  to  ten  thousand 
\cars  of  age. 

2.  "Kitchen  middens"  or  "  Kitchen  refuse-heaps"  These 
consist  of  mounds  near  the  shore  of  the  sea,  varying  in 
dimensions,  but  seldom  exceeding  one  thousand  feet  in 
length,  one  hundred  and  fifty  to  two  hundred  in  breadth,  and 
three  to  ten  feet  in  depth.  They  occur  on  the  coasts  of  Den- 
mark and  Norway,  and  the  Atlantic  Coast  of  North  America. 
They  are  composed  principally  of  shells  of  the  oyster,  cockle, 
and  other  edible  mollusks,  mixed  with  the  bones  of  different 
animals  employed  as  food.  In  the  heaps  are  found  hammers, 
hatchets,  spear-heads,  and  knives  in  stone,  horn,  bone,  and 
*'»xl,  and  fragments  of  pottery,  charcoal,  cinders,  etc.,  but  no 
bronze  nor  iron.  Many  of  the  hatchets  are  polished  or 
brought  to  an  edge  by  grinding.  There  are  no  human  bones 
»a  them,  but  the  peat  mosses  and  stone  mounds  in  the  same 
'■■ealities  in  Europe,  which  are  believed  to  have  the  same  age, 
contain  them. 

'lhe  size  and  distance  from  the  shore  of  some  of  the  mounds, 
*"<!  the  characters  of  the  shells  they  contain,  furnish  the 
•neans,  as  6ome  think,  of  reckoning  the  shell-mound  men  back 
to  the  age  of  the  palafites — seven  thousand  to  ten  thousand 
years. 

3.  Another  class  of  evidences  of  a  high  antiquity  for  man,  is 
obtained  from  certain  limestone  caverns  in  various  parts 
of  Kurope.     Attention  was  first  pointedly  directed  to  these  by 

•  Etudes  Geohguiues,  archcuologiques  en  Danemark  el  en  Suisse.     Par  A.  Morlot. 


As 

100  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Mem.  [January 

Schmerling,  of  Liege,  in  1833  and  1834,  who  studied  some  of  the 
caverns  along  the  valley  of  the  Meuse,  in  Belgium.  The 
researches  of  Dr.  Falconer,  Mr.  Pengelly,  Mr.  Prestwick,  and 
Sir  Charles  Lyell,  of  England,  of  MM.  Tournal,  Christol, 
Lartet,  Gervais,  and  others  in  France,  and  the  recent  ad- 
mirable researches  of  M.  Dupont,  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Belgian  Government,  in  the  valleys  of  the  Meuse  and  Lesse, 
have  been  the  means  of  collecting  much  highly  interesting 
information,  some  of  it  bearing  on  the  question  under  con- 
sideration. These  caverns  seldom  have  much  depth,  usually 
have  wide  mouths,  and  open  in  the  sides  of  the  river  valleys, 
and  in  the  majority  of  cases  are  partially  or  wholly  filled  with 
layers  of  gravel,  sand,  and  clay,  and  occasionally  layers  of 
stalagmite,  formed  by  the  dropping  from  the  roof  of  water, 
holding  in  solution  the  carbonate  of  lime  of  which  the  stalag- 
mite consists. 

Imbedded  in  these  deposits,  at  various  depths,  sometimes 
beneath  several  unbroken  layers  of  stalagmite,  are  found  flint 
chips,  arrow  and  spear  heads,  hatchets,  knives,  bones  of 
various  animals,  frequently  of  extinct  species,  which  bear  in 
many  cases  the  marks  of  man,  as  when  long  bones  are  found 
split  open,  evidently  to  procure  the  marrow  they  contained, 
or  worked  into  various  implements  for  peaceful  or  warlike 
purposes.  Shells  of  many  kinds,  fresh  water  and  marine, 
of  both  extinct  and  living  species,  often  pierced  by  holes,  that 
they  might  be  strung  for  collars  or  other  ornaments.  Among 
the  bones  found,  of  animals  now  extinct,  we  may  mention  the 
cave  bear,  (ursus  sjielcvus,)  cave  lion,  (fclis  spelea,)  cave  hyena, 
{hyena  spelea)  rhinoceros,  {tichorinus,)  and  mammoth,  (or 
clejria-s  primogenius)  In  connection  with  them,  besides  the 
remains  of  human  industry  already  mentioned,  portions  of 
the  human  skeleton  have  been  found  in  several  caverns,  as  at 
Engis,  eight  miles  southwest  of  Liege,  on  the  left  bank  of  the 
Meuse  ;  at  Engihoul,  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  same  river ;  at 
Neanderthal,  near  Diisseldorf,  in  the  valley  of  the  Dnssel, 
(memoir  by  Professor  Schaff hausen ;)  at  Aurignac,  foot  of  the 
Pyrenees,  by  Lartet;  at  "  Trou  du  Frontal,"  "  Trou  dc 
Rosette,"  and  elsewhere,  by  M.  Dupont  and  others.  These, 
as  well  as  the  flint  and  bone  implements,  occur  in  connection 
with   the   remains    of  the    above-mentioned    extinct    animals 


1809.)       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  101 

under  such  circumstances  as  to  warrant  us  in  giving  them  the 
Ntme  a,re.  In  some  of  the  sepulchral  caverns  these  objects 
have  evidently  been  mixed,  so  as  to  destroy  the  signs  on 
which  reliance  could  be  placed  for  determining  their  relative 
age.  But  in  others,  occupied  as  dwellings,  the  case  seems  to  be 
different  Besides  the  relics  of  man  already  noticed,  various 
drawings  on  horn,  ivory,  etc.,  have  been  discovered,  as  of 
reindeer,  oxen,  horses,  boars,  bears,  fish,  etc.,  all  quite  rude. 
The  figure,  on  the  contrary,  of  a  reindeer,  found  by  M. 
Vibraye  in  Augerie,  (Commune  de  Tayac,)  which  is  copied  by 
Gcrvais  in  his  great  work,  is  very  good. 

But  the  most  singular  example  is  that  of  a  piece  of  ivory 
found  at  Madeline  in  one  of  these  deposits,  in  the  presence  of 
MM.  Lartet,  Falconer,  and  de  Verneuil,  on  which  was  neatly 
engraved  a  mammoth's  head  clothed  with  very  long  hair, 
which  is  now  known  to  have  been  characteristic  of  the  ele- 
j.hant  of  the  glacial  period,  since  specimens  of  these  animals 
have  been  found  in  frozen  gravel  in  Siberia  in  a  perfectly 
{'reserved  state,  having  long  hair,  suitable  to  a  cold  climate. 
M.  Vibraye  has  found  a  similar  specimen  at  Augerie,  except 
that  the  drawing  was  on  horn  instead  of  ivory.  Until  quite 
recently,  it  was  the  universal  custom  among  geologists  to 
place  the  mammoth  in  a  period  anterior  to  man.  But  the 
evidence  of  the  cave  deposits,  a  mere  outline  of  which  has 
been  given,  shows  beyond  dispute  that  man  and  the  mammoth 
were  contemporaneous.  This  being  true,  two  alternatives  pre- 
K'tit  themselves  :  either  the  mammoth  did  not  have  so  high  an 
antiquity  as  was  formerly  supposed,  or  the  period  of  man 
must  be  carried  further  baek  than  has  been  the  custom. 
Persons  have  not  been  wanting,  and  are  not  wanting  now, 
who  have  accepted  the  latter. 

■i-  Deltas.  The  most  remarkable  which  have  been  even 
cursorily  examined  are  those  of  the  Nile,  Ganges,  and  Missis- 
sippi. They  are  formed  in  such  manner  as  to  inspire  the  hope 
ihey  may  be  made  the  means  of  constructing  a  time  scale. 
Given  their  extent  and  present  rate  of  growth,  it  has  been 
wK>nght  an  easy  task  to  determine  their  age.  By  such  a 
method  Sir  Charles  Lyell  makes  the  delta  of  the  Mississippi 
one  hundred  thousand  years  old. 

Estimated  jn  the  same  way,  the  delta  of  the  Xilc  would  be 

Fourth  Rebus,  Vol.  XXL— 7 

'■ 


102  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

still  older.  The  same  author  considers  the  alluvial  deposits 
on  either  side  of  these  rivers  above  the  deltas  more  ancient 
still.  In  the  delta  of  the  Mississippi,  near  the  city  of  New 
Orleans,  Dr.  Bennett  Dowler  says  some  workmen,  in  digging 
for  the  foundation  of  a  gas- work,  found,  sixteen  feet  below  the 
surface,  some  charcoal  and  ashes,  and  what  proved  to  be  the 
skeleton  of  an  Indian.  Above  the  skeleton  the  remains  of  no 
less  than  four  successive  cypress  forests  were  discovered,  which 
had  been  extinguished  in  the  progress  of  time.  Dr.  Dowler 
estimated  the  skeleton  had  been  in  situ  fifty  thousand  years. 

Then  again,  at  the  foot  of  a  steep  embankment  of  "  loess  " 
or  alluvium,  near  Natchez,  not  many  years  since,  certain 
bones  of  the  mastodon,  and  of  a  species  of  horse  and  ox,  were 
picked  up,  and  among  them  some  human  bones,  supposed  to 
have  come  from  the  same  formation,  and  to  have  been  of  the 
same  age  as  the  mastodon,  which  was  traced  to  a  point  up  the 
side  of  the  embankment,  about  thirty  feet  below  the  surface. 
The  formation  supposed  to  have  yielded  the  human  bones 
some  geologists  believe  to  be  older  than  the  delta  proper  ;  and 
if  so,  the  bones  must  have  been  from  one  hundred  thousand 
years  old  to  an  indefinite  period.  In  the  valley  and  delta  of 
the  Nile  some  highly  interesting  researches  have  been  made. 
by  a  Mr.  Horner,  in  behalf  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Great 
Britain,  and  by  a  learned  Oriental,  Hekekyan  Bey,  the  latter, 
singularly  enough,  at  the  expense  of  the  Viceroy  of  Egypt. 
No  less  than  fifty-one  pits  and  borings  were  made  on  a  line 
from  East  to  West,  eight  miles  above  the  delta,  where  the 
valley  or  flat  is  sixteen  miles  wide  between  the  Arabian  and 
Lybian  hills.  Another  line  of  twenty-seven  pits  and  borings 
was  made  still  higher  up,  about  the  level  of  Memphis,  where 
the  valley  is  five  miles  wide.  Invariably  they  passed  through 
the  ordinary  Nile  mud  unstratified,  according  to  the  above- 
mentioned  observers.  But  Captain  Ncwbold,  on  the  contrary, 
found  alternating  layers  of  sand  and  mud  some  distance,  even, 
from  the  adjacent  deserts. 

All  the  remains  of  organic  bodies  belonged,  without  excep- 
tion, to  living  species.     The  shells  were  all  fresh  water. 

M.  Girard"  taking  the  basis  of  certain  observations  made 
between  Assouan  and  Cairo,  believes  the  Nile  mud  to  have 
been  deposited  at  the  rate  of  about  five  inches  in  a  century. 


1809.1       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  103 

It  is  proper  to  remark  that  Mr.  Horner  did  not  place  any  reli- 
ance on  this  estimate.  In  the  excavations,  which  wene  carried 
down  in  some  places  to  the  depth  of  twenty-four  feet,  jars, 
rases,  pots,  human  figures  in  clay,  etc.,  were  found.  Still 
I.uvcr  down,  every- where,  to  the  depth  of  sixty  feet  or  more, 
t<>  which  the  borings  reached,  pieces  of  pottery  and  bricks 
were  obtained.  These  facts,  with  the  assumed  rate  of  deposit, 
would  place  the  lowest  brick  about  thirteen  to  fifteen  thousand 
years  back  of  1S6S.  Or,  if  we  take  another  boring  of  seventy- 
two  feet,  at  the  bottom  of  which  burnt  bricks  were  found, 
and  proceed  at  the  rate  M.  Kosiere  assigns,  their  age  would  be 
about  thirty  thousand  years. 

5.  lUver  Terraces,  etc.  Stretching  along  the  sides  of  many 
river  valleys,  both  in  this  country  and  Europe,  are  certain 
deposits  of  sand,  clay,  and  gravel,  sometimes  more  than  one 
hundred,  seldom  less  than  forty  feet  above  the  level  of  existing 
dreams.  These  terraces  have  been  long  known  to  contain 
remains  of  extinct  mammals,  and  various  fresh  water  shells, 
mostly  of  species  now  living.  But  it  is  only  in  comparatively 
recent  times  they  have  yielded  relics  of  man.  In  the  gravels 
of  the  Ouse  and  Waveney  in  England,  of  the  Seine  in  France, 
but  more  particularly  the  Somme  in  Picardy,  have  flint 
chips,  arrow  heads,  hatchets,  etc.,  been  discovered  in,the  same 
layers  with  bones  of  the  mammoth  and  other  extinct  animals. 
To  the  latter  valley  we  would  more  particularly  call  attention. 
It  is  excavated  in  the  chalk-like  limestone  which  abounds 
in  that  part  of  France,  especially  in  the  Jura.  On  the  slopes 
of  the  valley,  resting  on  the  chalk,  are,  first  and  deepest, 
alternating  layers  of  gravel,  marl,  and  sand,  altogether  about 
twelve  feet  thick,  containing  fresh  water  and  occasionally 
marine  shells,  bones  of  the  elephant  and  rhinoceros,  with  flint 
implements. 

Next  above  this  a  sandy,  buff-colored  loam,  with  doubtful 
traces  of  stratification,  about  fifteen  feet  in  thickness,  containing 
Bimilar  remains.  Above  this,  brown,  unstratified  clay,  with 
angular  flints  and  angular  pieces  of  chalk  covering  the  slopes 
of  the  hills,  and  varying  in  thickness  from  three  to  five  feet. 
&-ast  of  all,  a  layer  of  peat,  near  the  level  of  the  existing 
ftreatn,  in  many  places  thirty  feet  in  depth.  This,  unlike  the 
other   layers,   only    occupies    the   bottoih    of  the   valley.     It 


104  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January. 

includes  remains  of  various  animals,  such  as  the  beaver  and 
arctic  bear,  flint  implements  in  abundance,  and  portions  of  the 
human  skeleton. 

M.  Boucher  de  Perthes,  of  Abbeville,  Mr.  Evans,  Mr.  Prest- 
wich,  Dr.  Falconer,  Sir  Charles  Lyell,  and  others  in  England. 
and  MM.  Lartet,  Eavin,  Eigollot,  and  others  in  France, 
have  pursued  their  examinations  of  the  gravels  and  peats  of 
this  valley,  and  others,  until  what  was  once  disputed  is  now 
generally  admitted,  namely,  human  remains  are  met  with 
deep  in  the  gravels,  as  well  as  the  overlying  peats,  under  such 
circumstances  as  to  show,  first,  a  probable  high  antiquity; 
second,  that  man  and  the  mammoth  were  contemporaneous,  at 
least  in  Europe. 

For  more  than  a  quarter  of  a  century  has  M.  Boucher  de 
Perthes  been  examining  the  peats  and  gravels  of  the  Somme 
for  remains  of  man  and  extinct  mammals.  But  it  was  not  un- 
til quite  recently  that  he  succeeded  in  attracting  the  attention 
of  scientific  men.  In  the  last  few  years,  however,  no  single 
locality,  perhaps,  has  filled  a  larger  place  in  the  eyes  of 
geologists.  The  flint  implements  and  skeletons  were  discov- 
ered at  various  depths  in  the  peats  and  gravels,  almost  down 
to  the  underlying  chalk. 

Besides  these,  Mr.  H.  T.  Gosse,  of  Geneva,  found  at  La 
Motte,  in  the  left  bank  of  the  Seine,  near  Paris,  flint  imple- 
ments twenty  feet  below  the  surface  in  the  "  gray  diluvium. ;T 
M.  P.  Delacourt,  at  Precy,  in  the  valley  of  the  Oise,  found 
implements  in  its  gravel  beds,  and  also  M.  Lartet,  at  Clicliy. 
In  England  they  have  been  obtained  in  the  gravels  of  the 
Ouse,  near  Bedford,  by  Mr.  Wyat ;  at  Hoxnc,  in  Suffolk,  by 
Mr.  John  Frere,  beneath  twelve  feet  of  brick  clay,  and 
at  Icklingham,  in  the  valley  of  the  Lark ;  as  well  as  in  many 
other  places.  The  only  question  of  much  importance  here 
relates  to  the  age  of  the  deposits.  From  certain  observations 
made  on  the  peat,  M.  Boucher  de  Perthes,  and  other  geolo- 
gists, concluded  it  is  formed  at  the  rate  of  one  or  two  inches 
in  a  century.  This  being  true,  it  would  require,  to  lay  down 
thirty  feet  in  thickness  of  peat,  at  least  twenty  thousand 
years.  The  gravels  were  supposed  to  have  been  laid  very 
slowly,  and  are,  of  course,  older  than  the  peats.  The  lowest 
remains  they  have  yielded  may  therefore  be  reckoned  at,  say 


1569.1        Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  105 

fifty  thousand  to  one  hundred  thousand  years  of  age.  Then 
«uiito  similar  peat  formations  occur  in  the  depressions  in  the 
boulder  drift  in  Denmark,  where  pine  trunks  several  feet  in 
thickness  are  entombed,  and  of  a  species  (jpimts  sylvcstns)  not 
found  in  Denmark  for  centuries  past.  Beneath  one  of  these 
j.inc  trunks,  deeply  buried  in  the  peat,  Steenstrup,  a  Swedish 
archaeologist,  took  out  with  his  own  hands  one  of  the  in- 
evitable stone  hatchets. 

•».  Lastly,  at  the  meeting  of  the  American  Association 
tor  the  Advancement  of  Science,  at  Chicago,  in  August  last, 
this  whole  subject  of  the  antiquity  of  man  was  discussed,  but 
every  thing  said  paled  away  before  the  case  presented  by  the 
State  Geologist  of  California,  who  exhibited  a  skull  from 
Calaveras  County,  in  that  State,  from  one  hundred  and  thirty 
feet  below  the  surface.  It  was  covered  by  seven  or  eight 
layers  each,  alternating,  of  gravel  and  volcanic  ash.  But, 
most  remarkable  of  all,  there  is  now  in  the  museum  of  the 
Boston  Society  of  Natural  History  a  portion  of  a  skull  the 
label  on  which  bears  the  following :  "  Fossil  human  skull  from 
s  shaft  in  Table  Mountain,  California ;  found  one  hundred  and 
eighty  feet  below  the  surface,  in  gold  drift,  among  rolled 
atones,  and  near  mastodon  debris.  Overlying  strata  of 
basaltic  compactness  and  hardness.  Found  July,  1S57. 
From  C.  F.  Winslow,  M.  D.,  September  10,  1857."  * 

The  age  of  these  specimens,  if  they  are  genuine,  has  not 
been  determined,  thus  leaving  the  enthusiastic  believer  in  a 
high  antiquity  for  man  to  go  as  far  back  into  past  duration  as 
bis  imagination  may  carry  him. 

Such'  is  a  summary  of  the  most  striking  facts  which  have 
recently  come  to  light  bearing  on  the  antiquity  of  man.  In 
making  this  statement  we  have  not  overlooked  the  fossil  man 
of  Denise,  nor  the  relics  found  at  Santos,  in  South  America, 
M  described  by  Dr.  Meigs,  {Trams.  Am.  Phil.  Soc,  1828,) 
:">r  the  human  bones  found  by  Count  Fortales  in  the  Florida 
coral  reefs,  as  well  as  other  instances.  None  of  them,  we  are 
prepared  to  say,  are  more  favorable  to  the  antiquity  of  man 
than  the  cases  already  cited. 

J-et  us  now  turn,  and,  in  the  order  in  which  they  have  been 
given,  examine  them  in  the  presence  of  collateral  facts,  that  we 
*  Am.  Nat.,  Oct.  18C8,  p.  4-16.     Note. 


106  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

may,   if  possible,   determine    alike  their  scientific   aud   their 
logical  value. 

I.  Evidence  from  Swiss  lake  dwellings  and  other  similar 
sources. 

That  a  people  once  had  their  habitations  on  the  lakes  of 
Central  Europe  there  can  be  no  question.  It  is  also  certain, 
that  written  history  gives  us  but  little,  if  any,  information  re- 
garding them.  Early  historical  material  relating  to  Central 
Europe,  scanty  as  it  is,  goes  no  further  back  than  when  the 
Romans  began  their  inroads  among  the  Iberians,  Helvetians. 
and  Gauls,  or  to  the  time  of  Julius  Cesar,  two  thousand  years 
ago.  We  thus  have,  according  to  the  ordinary  count,  a 
period  of  four  thousand  years  in  which  the  lake  dwellers 
could  build  their  huts,  have  their  day,  and  perish.  People 
more  numerous,  with  dwellings  more  substantial,  have  been 
utterly  destroyed  within  a  much  briefer  period.  This  country, 
only  a  few  years  ago,  was  in  the  sole  possession  of  a  numerous 
and  powerful  people,  of  the  stone  age,  too,  of  whom  only  the 
traces  remain  to-day,  except  in  the  fastnesses  of  the  wild 
West.  What  has  happened  to  so  many  other  peoples  may 
have  happened  to  the  palafites  men.     Why  not? 

The  thickness  of  the  deposits  on  the  site  of  the  "  palafites," 
from  beneath  which  relics  have  been  taken,  has  been  thought 
in  some  cases  to  indicate  a  high  antiquity.  They  seldom  ex- 
ceed six  or  seven  feet.  An  old  fisherman  told  M.  Desor  that 
when  a  child  he  used  to  amuse  himself  by  poking  at  the  old 
vessels  of  pottery,  of  which  "  great  heaps  "  were  then  exposed 
at  certain  of  the  "  Tenevrieres,"  where,  nevertheless,  they  are 
now  obliged,  it  seems,  to  dredge  for  them.  There  are  many 
facts  which  show  that  such  deposits  of  mud  as  in  most  cases 
cover  the  palafites  may  take  place  with  comparative  rapidity. 
Three  miles  oil' the  city  of  Cleveland  a  British  vessel  was  sunk  in 
sixty  feet  water,  which  is  below  the  line  of  erosive  action  from 
the  waves,  which  cannot  be  said  in  behalf  of  the  palafite  de- 
posits. This  happened  during  the  war  of  1S12,  in  a  naval  fight, 
and  the  report  being  circulated  that  the  vessel  had  carried  down 
considerable  treasure,  it  was  visited  recently  by  some  divers, 
and  found  covered  up  in  a  layer  of  clay  twelve  feet  in  thickness, 
all  of  which  has  been  deposited  in  less  than  sixty  years. 

In  many  even  of  the  stone  stations  the  piles  stand  not  only 


\w9.]       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Mem.  107 

*„uo  distance  above  the  bottom,  but  in  a  few  cases,  if  we  read 
Might,  bear  the  marks  of  the  implement  by  means  of  which 
ibey  were  prepared.      Now  we  know  wood   covered   up  in 
r»tcr,  more  especially  in  mud,  will  be  preserved  a  very  long 
lime     But  that  the  piles  could  have  endured  six  thousand 
years,  subject  to  the  action  of  waves  and  light,  and  yet  retain 
ihe  marks  of  the  ax,  lacks  the  confirmation  of,  if  it  is  not  con- 
trary to,  all  experience.     But  beyond  this,  at  certain  of  the 
u  palafites,"  as  at  Tene,  Gallic  coins  of  bronze,  one  of  them  a 
Tiberius  the  other  a  Claudius,  have  been  ,obtained,  which  re- 
temble  exactly  certain  coins  now  met  with  quite  frequently  in 
France  and  Switzerland.     Others  from  Tiefuau,  near  Berne, 
bear  the  effigies  of  Diana  and  Apollo.      Coins  of  silver  and 
g  ild  have  also  been  discovered,  all  of  them  Roman.     Besides 
these,  Ptoman  vases,  and  tiles  of  terra  sigillaria,  have  been  found 
at  several  stations,  all  of  which  shows  that  they  were  inhabited 
during  the  Roman  period,  however  completely  written  history 
may  have  ignored  them.     M.  Keller  says,  that  on  the  river 
Limnat,  near  Zurich,  several  huts  were  constructed  on  piles 
and  inhabited  by  fishermen   so  late  as  the  seventeenth  and 
eighteenth  centuries.     They  have  been  by  no  means  uncom- 
mon in  the  past.     Herodotus  describes  the  Peonians  of  Lake 
Prasias,  in  Thrace,  as  dwelling  on  pile  buildings.     A  like  fact 
U  mentioned  by  Hippocrates.      Mr.    Layard   notices   certain 
representations  of  such  dwellings  among  the  Assyrian  inscrip- 
tions, and   also  the   singular  island  habitations  of  the  Afaij 
Arabs  on  the  marshes  of  the  Euphrates.     When  the  Spaniards 
first  entered  the  lagoon  of  Maracaybo,  on  the  Caribbean,  they 
Were  astonished  to   see  the   people   with   their  dwellings  on 
piles,  and  gave  the  land  the  name  it  bears  to  this  day  in  com- 
memoration of  the  feet— Venezuela.     The  Papuans  of  New 
Guinea,    the    negroes    on    Lake    Tchad,    according    to    Dr. 
Laikie,  the  Malays  and  Chinese  established  at  Bankok,  and 
!,'i  the  coasts  of  Borneo,  and  the  fishermen  on  the  Bosphoros, 
not   to  mention   other  examples,   live   in   the   same    manner 
to-day. 

The  "palafitc"  men  cultivated  not  only  the  same  species, 
but  the  same  variety  of  barley,  as  was  cultivated  in  ancient 
Italy,  and  is  figured,  according  to  Pekring,  on  the  Egyptian 
monuments,  and  found  with  Egyptian  mummies.     The  same 


108  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

kind  of  flax  was  cultivated  alike  by  the  ancient  Egyptians  and 
the  Lacustrine  people  of  Central  Europe. 

So  far,  then,  as  the  "  palafites  "  are  concerned,  there  seems 
to  be  no  valid  reason  for  extending  the  time  beyond  six  thou- 
sand years.  AYe  may  add  that,  ethnologic-ally,  Gervais,  a 
most  competent  judge,  assimilates  the  Lake-dwellers  with 
the  Fins  and  Laplanders  who  to-day  inhabit  the  north  of 
Europe,  and  who  have  with  them  now  the  reindeer,  which 
was  employed  by  the  "  prehistoric  men "  of  Central  and 
Southern  Europe,  where  at  present,  in  common  with  the  race 
of  men  it  served,  it  is  extinct. 

2.  "Kitchen  Refuse  Heaps"  One  of  the  circumstance? 
supposed  to  favor  their  high  antiquity  is,'  that  they  are  often 
found  some  distance  from  the  shore,  occasionally  several  miles. 
But  in  the  older  shell  heaps  this  should  excite  no  surprise, 
since  no  fact  is  better  established  than  that  the  whole  north- 
west coast  of  Europe  and  the  British  Isles  are  undergoing 
slow  elevation  from  the  sea.  "Within  the  last  two  thousand 
years  the  whole  of  Scotland  has  been  raised  not  less  than 
twenty  feet,  and  in  some  places  more  than  thirty. 

The  ancient  beach  line  is  as  easily  traced  for  miles  twenty 
or  thirty  feet  above  high  tide  as  the  present  one.  In  the 
gravels  near  the  mouth  of  the  Clyde  no  less  than  eighteen, 
canoes  have  been  recovered  from  a  level  fully  twenty-two  feet 
above  high-water  mark.  One  was  on  end,  as  if  sunk  and 
partly  buried  in  a  storm.  One  contained  a  fine  polished  stone 
hatchet,  and  one  a  piece  of  cork,  which  latter  could  only  have 
come  from  South  Europe.  (Geikie.) 

In  the  Carse  of  Gowrie,  which  borders  on  the  north  side  of 
the  Tay,  various  works  of  art  have  been  exhumed,  such  as 
iron  boat-hooks  and  several  iron  anchors,  from  a  height  above 
the  sea  of  between  twenty  and  thirty  feet.  A  piece  of  Roman 
pottery  has  been  found  in  the  same  beach  at  Leith.  A  rude 
ornament  of  Cannel  coal  has  been  discovered  in  the  parish  of 
Dundonald,  lying  fifty  feet  above  the  sea  level,  among  shells. 

Along  the  Scottish  shores,  it  is  well  known,  the  old  Roman 
harbors  in  some  cases  are  several  mile's  inland.  At  an  eleva- 
tion of  more  than  two  hundred  feet,  on  .the  coasts  of  Norway 
and  Sweden,  raised  beaches  are  found  containing  shells  ot 
recent  species.     Count  Albert  de  la  Marmora,  in  his  Geology 


1*<V;K]        Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  109 

t  (  Sardinia,  describes  an  ancient  beach,  containing  shells  and 
puttcry,  three  hundred  feet  above  the  sea.  The  island  of 
Crete,  or  Candia,  one  hundred  and  thirty-five  miles  in  length, 
!.-i.  been  raised  at  the  west  end  twenty-five  feet,  so  that  the 
ancient  ports  are  high  and  dry,  while  the  east  end  has  sunk,  so 
«,:  »t  the  ruins  of  old  towns  are  under  water. 

The  remarkable  case  of  the  old  temple  of  Jupiter  Serapis  at 
I'ozzuoli  is  well  known.  The  changes  in  level  of  the  west 
coast  of  South  America  within  the  past  two  hundred  years 
rill  be  remembered.  On  the  island  of  San  Lorenzo,  near  this 
c<-a-t,  Mr.  Charles  Darwin  found  pieces  of  cotton  thread, 
plaited  rushes,  and  the  head  of  a  stalk  of  corn,  imbedded  with 
■hells,  in  a  raised  beach  eighty-five  feet  above  the  sea.  The 
bland  of  Santa  Maria,  in  the  same  vicinity,  was  raised  in 
1S>7  eight  to  ten  feet  in  a  few  hours.  In  1819  Fort  Sindree, 
and  a  considerable  tract  of  country  about  it,  near  the  mouth  of 
the  Indus,  was  suddenly  sunk  down,  so  that  only  the'  tops  of 
the  houses  projected  above  the  waters  of  the  lake  which  formed 
on  its  site.  The  same  spot,  by  1S45,  was  converted  into  a  salt 
marsh.  In  Cashmere,  where,  earthquakes  are  frequent,  shells 
of  species  now  inhabiting  the  lakes  of  the  country,  and  with 
Ihem  pieces  of  pottery,  are  found  in  some  cases  fifty  feet  below 
♦lie  surface.  In  this  same  region  a  beautiful  Hindoo  temple 
baa  lately  been  discovered  and  exposed  to  view,  which  for 
fovcral  centuries  has  been  covered  up  in  lacustrine  silt. 

J  lie  recent  fearful  elevations  and  depressions  of  the  Pacific 
coast  of  South  America  will  testify  how  speedily  both  the  level 
»fi«l  the  immediate  surface  of  parts  of  the  earth's  crust  may  be 
changed  by  volcanic  agency.  If,  then,  we  should  find  a  few 
^  Kitchen  middens"  even  several  miles  inland,  it  would  be  far 
from  proving  of  necessity  a  high  antiquity  for  man. 

Another  supposed  proof  of  their  great  age  depends  on  the 
character  of  the  shells  in  the  heaps.  These  consist  entirely  of 
hiring  species.  The  common  oyster  is  among  them,  not  ex- 
cepting even  the  heaps  on  the  shores  of  the  Baltic,  in  whose 
haters,  however,  the  oyster  is  not  now  found.  The  water  of 
that  sea  (as  in  the  case  of  most  inland  seas)  has  become  brack- 
**«.  The  oyster  can  only  flourish  in  fresh  sea  water.  The 
remains  of  other  mollusks  are  found  in  the  Baltic  heaps,  as  of 
'he  mussel,  cockle,  and  periwinkle,  and  also  in  its  water;  but 


110  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

the  specimens  now  living  in  the  sea,  though  of  the  same  spe- 
cies, are  much  smaller  than  the  remains  in  the  heaps  would 
indicate.  To  produce  that  change  in  the  water  of  the  sea 
which  would  result  in  driving  out  the  oyster,  and  in  dimin- 
ishing in  size  the  cockle  and  mussel,  it  is  supposed  would 
consume  a  long  period  of  time  ;  but  the  gradual  elevation  of 
the  land,  and  with  it  the  change  in  relative  level  of  the  Baltic 
and  the  ocean,  will  enable  us  to  explain  such  a  change  as  is  con- 
templated without  necessitating  a  long  period.  "Within  the  past 
few  weeks,  indeed,  it  is  reported,  certain  remarkable  changes 
in  the  level  of  this  sea  have  occurred.  One  evening  recentlv  its 
waters  began  to  subside,  and  by  ten  o'clock  had  sunk  down  one 
foot,  and  so  continued  until  two  o'clock  the  following  afternoon, 
when  the  greatest  depression  was  reached,  of  three  feet  and 
two  inches.  From  this  time  the  water  began  to  rise  rapidly, 
and  during  the  succeeding  night  reached  a  foot  above  the  or- 
dinary level.  Most  of  the  steamers  plying  between  Cronstadt 
and  St.  Petersburg  are  said  to  have  been  aground  during  the 
period  of  depression.  In  view  of  all  the  facts  pertinent  to  a 
judgment  on  this  case  there  is  nothing  which  may  not  have 
transpired  in  far  less  time  than  six  thousand  years. 

3.  Deltas.  The  only  delta  which  has  been  submitted  to 
any  thing  like  a  careful  examination  is  that  of  the  Mississippi. 
Tin's  has  been  thoroughly  explored  by  Messrs.  Humphreys  and 
Abbott,  of  the  Government  Survey.  Without  attempting  to 
state  all  the  facts  accumulated,  it  may  be  remarked  they  find 
the  delta,  from  apex  to  base,  to  be  two  hundred  and  twenty 
miles  in  length,  and  that  at  present,  it  advances  into  the  Gulf 
at  the  mean  annual  rate  of  two  hundred  and  sixty -two  feet. 
In  this  manner  it  would  require  at  most  about  four  thousand 
four  hundred  years  for  its  formation.  Readers  will  not  fail  to 
notice  the  difference  between  this  result,  and  those  of  Drs. 
Bowler  and  Eiddell,  and  Sir  Charles  Lyell,  namely,  about 
ninety-four  thousand  years.  But  certain  facts  render  it  uncer- 
tain if  even  so  much  time  as  four  thousand  and  four  hundred 
years  lias  been  consumed. 

1)  The  apex  of  the  delta  would  form  more  rapidly,  all  cir- 
cumstances being  equal,  than  the  base,  or  more  rapidly  than 
two  hundred  and  sixty-two  feet  per  annum.  2)  Singular  eleva- 
tions of  the  bottom  of  the  gulf  near  the  delta,  and  perhaps  the 


1 E  G&J       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  Ill 

uVhn  itself,  known  as  "mud  lumps."  occur  with  frequency,  by 
means  of  which  acres  in  extent  are  in  some  cases  raised,  often 
above  the  surface  of  the  water,  and  from  the  "  lump  "  inflammable 
.  escapes,  and  occasionally  salt  springs  break  out.  After  the 
<«<-:i|>e  of  the  gas, the  ''lump"  partially  subsides,  but  in  some 
instances  remains  near  the  level  of  the  surface  of  the  water. 

These  elevations  have  sometimes  appeared  in  a  few  days,  or 
even  a  few  hours'  time.  How  much  they  may  have  aided  in 
the  elevation  of  the  delta  from  the  waters  of  the  gulf  we  can 
only  conjecture,  but  it  is  safe  to  say  they  must  have  had  no  in- 
considerable  share.  The  Northeast  Lighthouse  at  one  of  the 
mouths  of  the  river  is  to-day  one  quarter  of  a  mile  farther 
fr<>:n  the  bar  than  it  was  four  or  five  years  ago.  An  island  has 
termed  in  the  Northeast  Pass,  three  quarters  of  a  mile  in 
length,  within  the  memory  of  man  ;  nevertheless,  trees  are  now 
growing  near  its  edge,  though  it  is  marshy  in  its  interior.  It 
M  constantly  and  rapidly  increasing  at  this  time.  The  alluvium, 
along  the  banks  of  the  river,  above  the  delta,  has  been  described 
is  of  great  depth.  But  recent  borings  show  a  depth  of  only 
twenty-five  feet  near  Cairo,  thirty-five  feet  in  the  Yazoo  swamp 
and  down  to  Baton  Rouge,  at  New  Orleans,  about  forty  feet 
below  the  level  of  the  gulf,  and  in  the  Atchafalaya  basin,  not 
more  than  thirty  feet  in  thickness.  Such  are  a  few  of  the  re- 
cent  facts  relating  to  the  delta  and  alluvium  of  the  Mississippi. 
Tlicy  are  very  far  from  requiring  of  necessity  even  six  thousand 
years  in  which  for  the  delta  to  form. 

In  relation  to  the  delta  and  valley  of  the  Nile,  no  one  is  en- 
titled to  speak  until  it  has  been  more  carefully  explored. 
There  is  no  reason,  meanwhile,  to  suppose  its  evidence  any 
U-tter  than  that  of  the  Mississippi.  At  any  rate,  until  we  have 
Wore  definite  information  it  must  be  held  sub  judice,  with  a 
strong  presumption  against  it. 

4.  Cave  Deposits.  The  main  interest  attaching  to  these 
•nses  from  the  fact  that  they  appear  to  show  conclusively  the 
Contemporaneity  of  man  and  certain  extinct  animals,  as  the 
f ■t'liiiiiioth  and  tichorine  rhinoceros.  The  evidence  for  the  an- 
ucjoity  of  these  deposits  depends  partly  on  the  character  of  their 
Wganic  remains,  and  partly  on  their  geological  character  and 
relations  in  other  respects.  But  the  geological  evidence  which 
•PpHes  here  is  identical  with  that  of  similar  cases  out  of  the 


112    •      Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  2fan.    [January, 

caverns.  In  view  of  this  fact  we  will  adjourn  its  discussion 
until  the  next  paragraph.  There  are,  however,  some  special 
facts  which  should  be"  mentioned  before  passing.  They  are 
generally  held  to  be  more  ancient  than  the  "  palafites,"  though 
some  are  believed  to  belong  to  the  palafite  period,  as  the  cav- 
erns Roca  Blanca,  Gauges,  Laroque,  etc.,  in  France. 

In  the  cavern  de  Pondres,  much  relied  on  to  show  a  high 
antiquity  for  man,  especially  by  Emilien  Dumas,  further  ex- 
aminatious  have  revealed  a  polished  stone  hatchet  and  the 
tooth  of  a  sheep.  The  hatchet  belongs  to  the  neolithic  period, 
(close  of  the  stone  age,)  which  would  bring  the  contents  of 
the  cavern  down  to  a  point  in  time  this  side  of  most  of  the 
palafites  of  the  stone  age.  As  regards  the  tooth  of  a  sheep, 
it  may  be  remarked  that  Rutemeyer  and  His  did  not  find  re- 
mains of  this  animal  among  the  bones  taken  from  the  palafites, 
at  least  of  the  stone  age,  because,  as  it  was  decided,  the  sheep 
came  in  after  the  palafite  period.  The  inference  is  easy  to  be 
Been. 

The  remains  of  the  cock  have  not  been  found  in  the  stone 
palafites,  since,  as  in  the  case  of  the  sheep,  the  domestic  fowl  ap- 
peared at  a  later  date.  But  they  have  been  found  in  some  of 
the  caverns,  as  the  cavern  de  Duret.  Many  of  the  relics  found 
in  the  caverns,  once  believed  to  belong  to  extinct  animals,  have 
more  recently  been  ascertained  or  suspected  to  be  otherwise, 
fur  example :  The  cave  lion  (felis  spelceus)  cannot  be  clearly 
distinguished  from  the  common  lion  (fdis  Ico).  The  cave 
hj-ena  {hyena  sjpclca)  cannot  be  distinguished  by  specific 
marks  from  hyena  crocuta,  intermedia,  or  vulgaris.  The  felis 
antiqua  is  probably  the  same  as  the  panther  {felis  parda). 
It  is  by  no  means  clear  that  the  hippopotamus  major  is 
different  from  that  of  the  Xile  and  Senegal.  But  many  of  the 
remains  belong  certainly  to  extinct  species ;'  as  the  cave  bear, 
(ursus  sjjelaius,)  taraudnus  martialis,  (a  kind  of  deer,)  Irish 
elk,  (megaceros  Hibe miens,)  rhinoceros  tichoi'inus,  etc.* 

Many  of  the  relics  belong  to  animals  extinct  in  Southern 
Europe,  but  living  in  adjacent  parts.  For  example,  the  bones 
of  the  marmot,  the  hamster,  of  several  spermophiles,  the  bison, 
the  reindeer,  etc.,  are  found  in  the  caves.  But  the  marmot  is 
known  to  live  now,  in  Europe,  only  in  Savoy,  the  hamster  near 
*  Gervais,  p.  70,  et  seq. 


1869.]       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  113 

Strasbourg,  the  spermophiles  in  Poland,  the  bison  in  the  forests 
.  f  Lithuania)  and  the  reindeer  in  North  Europe.  Aside  from 
vltat  the  cave  deposits  present  in  common  with  the  outer  qua-. 
;<rnary  deposits,  there  seems  to  be  no  fact  which  demands  a 
longer  period  of  time  than  six  thousand  years.  Let  us  then 
turn,  in  the  next  place,  to  the 

6.  Terraces,  peat-beds,  and  gravels  of  the  Somme  and  else- 
v.«here.  Here  the  question  is  not  whether  remains  of  man 
have  been  discovered  buried  in  peats  and  gravels,  in  connec- 
tion with  the  remains  of  extinct  animals,  but  as  to  the  time  in 
which  such  changes  as  are  exhibite'd  could  occur,  and  as  to 
r,„'L'iicies  and  attending  circumstances. 

It  is  the  vexed  question  among  geologists  to-day,  and  will 
bo  for  years  to  come,  as  to  the  rapidity  with  which  the  super- 
ficial changes  in  the  earth's  crust  have  been  wrought,  especially 
during  the  upper  tertiary  and  quaternary  periods.  More  than 
thirty  years  ago,  Sir  Charles  Lyell  set  forth  what  has  been  called 
the  "  Uniformitarian  Theory."  It  not  only  declares  that  all 
the  changes  which  the  earth's  crust  has  undergone  in  the  past 
were  produced  by  the  same  agencies  as  produce  similar  changes 
Bow,  but  that,  on  a  moderate  average,  they  occurred  at  the 
•Amu  rate  as  at  present.  By  this  rule,  if  you  can  ascertain  how 
rapidly  a  given  change  happens  now,  you  have,  to  say  the  least, 
•mi  approximate  measure  by  which  to  construe,  as  to  past  dura- 
tion, the  record  of  the  rocks.  This  being  by  many  accepted, 
/^•logists  have  very  naturally  been  endeavoring  to  construct 
I  :iic  bcales,  but  thus  far  on  an  insufficient  basis. 

There  are  facts  which  point  to  a  fundamental  modification 
of  the  rule.  It  is,  that  as  we  approach  the  period  of  man, 
geological  changes,  on  an  average,  take  place  with  a  rapidity 
•Uich  tinds  its  maximum  in  the  lowest  sedimentary  rocks,  and 
m  minimum  in  the  historic  period.  The  age  of  man  is  the 
'■'■"M  tranquil  of  all.  Our  beds  of  peat,  sand,  clay,  and  gravel 
***-'  laid  down  now  in  much  the  same  manner ;  our  earthquakes 
■:-'l  continental  elevations,  it  is  true,  are  accomplished  by  the 
'*me  agencies;  but  the  rate  of  action  is,  of  necessity,  by  no 
fcteana  the  same  as  formerly. 

"  e  are  only  now  beginning  to  witness  at  least  a  more 
Funeral,  if  only  a  partial,  acceptance  of  the  contrary  view, 
"Inch  admits  of  sudden  changes  in  the  rapidity  with  which 


114:  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.    [January, 

the  same  agency  operates  in  various  periods  in  geological 
history. 

The  opinion  seems  to  be  growing,  that  a  much  more  ex- 
tended study  of  the  superficial  formations  is  necessary  before 
definite  chronological  scales  can  be  constructed  on  a  geological 
basis,  if  indeed  they  ever  can  be. 

Out  of  many  facts  which  may  be  cited  to  show  the  newer 
formations  to  have  been  laid  down  with  more  rapidity  than  it 
has  been  customary  to  assume,  we  present  the  following : 

1.  During  the  progress  of  the  Chicago  tunnel  the  writer  of 
the  present  article  was  appointed  a  committee  from  the  Chi- 
cago Academy  of  Sciences  to  watch  for  any  facts  of  scientific 
interest  which  might  come  to  light.  The  horizontal  shaft  of 
the  tunnel  passed,  in  its  whole  extent  of  two  miles,  through  a 
fine,  compact,  drift  clay.  In  the  midst  of  the  clay,  at  intervals, 
masses  of  clean  gravel  were  found.  These  were  frequently  of 
large  size,  and  quite  irregular  in  form  and  disposition,  and 
often  had  a  perpendicular  height  of  two  feet  or  more.  The 
question  arose  as  to  how  such  isolated  masses  of  gravel  could 
occur  in  the  midst  of  fine  clay  without  mingling  2  The  only 
probable  way  in  which  it  could  occur  was  by  the  masses  in  a 
frozen  state  being  dropped  from  floating  icebergs  on  the  bot- 
tom of  the  glacial  sea,  and  covered  up  in  the  clay  before  melt- 
ing could  take  place.  Many  of  the  masses  were  elongated,  and 
stood  in  a  perpendicular  position,  several  feet  in  height.  Either 
the  melting  must  have  been  unnaturally  slow,  or  they  must 
have  been  very  suddenly  covered  up — in  a  few  hours  or  days 
at  most.  If  not  the  latter,  then  they  must  have  melted  down, 
and  the  gravel  and  clay  mingled,  as  they  are  not.  That  there 
was  a  current  in  the  waters  of  this  lake  there  can  be  no  doubt ; 
but  unless  the  masses  of  gravel  were  suddenly  overwhelmed, 
why  were  they  not  thrown  over  into  a  horizontal  posture,  where 
the  current  would  tend  to  place  them  \  The  facts  connected 
with  the  "gravel  pockets"  seemed  to  indicate  that  clay  had 
been  laid  down  with  a  rapidity  seldom  suspected. 

2.  With  this  fact  in  his  mind  our  colleague,  Professor  An- 
drews, while  in  Europe  recently  visited  the  valley  of  the 
Sonmie,  and  while  there  discovered  certain  corresponding 
facts  in  relation  to  its  peats  and  gravels. 

In  the  latter  he  found  evidence  that  instead  of  masses  ol 


1669.1        Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  115 

frozen  "ravel,  blocks  of  ice,  several  feet  perhaps  in  thickness, 
\.n>\  been  incarcerated  so  suddenly  as  to  give  no  time  for  melt- 
ii,"  until  afterward.  Moreover  the  gravel,  though  of  chalk, 
was  6eldom  waterworn,  while  in  many  cases  the  broken  edges 
were  sharp,  as  if  fractured  yesterday.  Both  of  these  facts,  if 
Jalv  considered,  will  necessitate  the  conclusion,  that  the  gravels 
of  the  Somme  must  have  be'en  laid  down  with  extreme  rapid- 
itv.  It  is  incredible  that  masses  of  ice  several  feet  in  thick- 
oeee  should  have  been  covered  up,  subsequently  to  melt,  if  the 
gravel  had  been  deposited  so  slowly  as  M.  Boucher  de  Perthes 
an«i  others  have  supposed.  It  would  have  required  several 
hundred  years,  to  say  the  least,  to  form  a  stratum  equal  in 
thickness  to  the  imbedded  ice-blocks.  The  angular  pieces  of 
chalk  which  compose  so  largely  the  gravels  of  the  Somme,  and 
the  singular  foldings  or  contortions  of  the  layers  of  gravel,  to- 
gether with  other  facts,  point  to  agencies  at  work  in  the  past 
unlike  in  degree,  perhaps  in  kind,  to  any  known  in  the  same  lo- 
cality at  present. 

In  relation  to  the  peat,  which  was  said  to  form  at  the  rate  of 
one  or  two  inches  in  a  century,  the  same  gentleman  found  in  it 
rtuuipe  of  considerable  height  standing  erect,  so  that  the  upper 
end  must  have  been  exposed  before  it  could  finally  be  covered 
leveral  hundred  years.  It  is  contrary  to  all  experience  for 
even  the  least  perishable  of  woods  to  last  so  long,  unless  deeply 
covered  up  in  water  or  mud. 

Singularly  enough,  Sir  Charles  Lyell,  almost  on  the  very 
page  in  which  he  approvingly  mentions  the  extreme  results  of 
M.  Boucher  de  Perthes  and  others,  relates  that  near  the  bottom 
"**  peat  thirty  feet  in  thickness  the  upright  stalks  of  the  alder 
•nd  hazel,  of  considerable  altitude,  are  fouud,  and  their  roots 
kl''l  in  the  original  soil  in  which  they  grew.  If  the  alder 
♦talks  had  been  only  two  inches  high  they  would  require  at 
least  one  hundred  years  in  which  to  be  covered  up  ;  but  as  it 
*as  they  must  have  stood  several  hundred.  It  is  needless  to 
»a.v  such  a  view  is  totally  contradictory  to  the  commonest 
<-'*WTience. 

As  to  the  human  remains  found  in  the  peats  and  gravels  of 
ti>c  Soinme,  they  present  in  the  main  the  same  characters  as 
those  of  the  Fins  and  Laplanders  of  North  Europe  of  the 
present  day.     The  jaw  found  at  Moulin  Quignon,  over  which 


116  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

so  much  has  been  said  on  account  of  its  obliquity,  Gervais  and 
Brinckrnan,  highly  competent  ethnologists  and  anatomists, 
pronounce  to  have  no  unusual  characteristic  not  met  with 
among  living  men  to-day. 

From  the  cave  de  Bethenas  (Isere)  a  case  of  similar  kind 
was  produced,  with  the  difference  that  most  of  the  cranium 
was  found,  and  in  connection  with  it  a  polished  stone  hatchet, 
under  such  circumstances  as  to  induce  the  belief  they  were  of 
the  same  age.  Besides  this  M.  Julien  found  a  jaw  still  more 
oblique  in  the  grotte  d'Aldene  in  the  department  of  Aude, 
(France.)  There  was  no  reason  to  demand  for  this  last  case  a 
higher  antiquity  than  for  the  crania  found,  for  example,  at 
M?alet,  Baillargues,  etc.,  in  which  latter  caverns  the  shape  of 
the  skulls  was  good,  judged  even  by  a  modern  standard. 
What  may  be  said  of  the  deposits  out  of  the  caverns  may  be 
said  of  those  in  them.  So  far  as  appears  in  the  light  of  recent 
facts,  all  such  as  have  been  found  to  contain  human  remains 
may  be  easily  accounted  for  in  six  thousand  years.* 

3.  In  relation  to  the  gravel  cones  at  Yilleneuve,  Switzerland, 
near  the  mouth  of  the  Tiniere,  examined  by  M.  Morlot,  Pro- 
fessor Andrews,  after  a  careful  investigation,  ascertained  that 

*  In  the  "  American  Journal  of  Sciences  and  Arts  "  for  November  of  the  present 
year  will  be  found  an  article,  accompanied  by  a  map  and  sections,  on  the  Amicus 
gravel  of  the  Valley  of  the  Somme,  by  Alfrf.d  Tylok,  Esq.,  F.R.S. 

The  observations  referred  to  were  more  extended  and  careful,  perhaps,  than  any 
ever  before  made  in  that  valley.  The  sections  of  the  gravel,  upon  which  the  paper 
is  mainly  based,  were  extremely  accurate  and  elaborate,  and  very  numerous,  and 
were  famished  Mr.  Tylor  by  M.  Guillom,  chief  engineer  of  the  railway  at  Amiens. 
They  furnish  an  exact  picture  of  the  surface  of  the  chalk  of  the  valley  prior  to 
the  "deposition  of  the  valley-gravel  and  '-loess."  It  is  impossible  within  the 
limits  of  a  note  to  give  all  the  results,  much  less  the  facts,  of  this  able  investiga- 
tion. To  use  the  language  of  the  author,  "the  conclusions  that  I  arrive  at  arc- 
extremely  dissimilar  to  those  of  Mr.  Prestwich  and  Sir  C.  Lyell."  They  may  be 
briefly  stated  as  follows : 

1.  The  surface  of  the  chalk  in  the  Valley  of  the  Somme  assumed  its  present 
Bhapo  previous  to  the  deposition  of  any  of  the  gravel  or  "loess,"  now  found  there. 
2.  Tho  gravels  do  not  occupy  two  distinct  levels,  separated  by  an  intervening 
escarpment  of  chalk,  parallel  to  the  river.  3.  The  gravels  were  transported  by 
immense  river-floods,  which,  as  the  facts  show,  filled  the  valley  at  least  eighty 
feet  above  the  level  of  the  existing  stream.  4.  That  these  valley  formations  indi- 
cate a  "  pluvial "  as  clearly  as  the  northern  drift  a  glacial  period.  This  "  pluvial 
period  was  characterized  by  immense  rain-falls,  and  may  be  recorded  as  imnuh- 
aUbj  preceding  the  historical  jicriod  at  the  farthest. 

(Who  knows  but  wo  have  here  fallen  on  the  traces  of  XoaKsfloodt) 


>.:.».]       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man  117 

Morlot  had  left  one  highly  important  element  out  of  his  calcu- 
.:•.  it.     Professor  Andrews  was  not  able  to  get  back  into  the 
part  more  than  "about  four  thousand  years,  instead  of  seven 
thousand  to  ten  thousand,  as  Horlot  had  done. 

<;.  Professor  Whitney's  skull.  This,  if  admitted  to  be  a 
into  case,  is  one  of  the  most  remarkable  on  record  so  far  as 
depth  beneath  the  surface  is  concerned.  But  it  will  be  remem- 
bered the  overlying  strata  were  composed  of  alternating  layers 
,-f '  vulcanic  ash  and  gravel.  There  is  every  reason  for  suppos- 
ing both  may  have  been  laid  down  with  great  rapidity,  espe- 
cially the  ash,  the  whole  thickness  of  which,  in  a  period  of 
rotcanic  activity,  might  have  been  thrown  out  in  a  few  years  at 
:  tost  The  region  is  well  known  to  have  been  the  theater  of 
.-'  at  volcanic  disturbance.  The  same  may  be  said,  even  more 
>  mphatically,  of  the  skull  in  the  Boston  Society  Museum,  if  it 
ii  t  true  fbd.  The  overlying  mass  is  said  to  be  basaltic  in 
eharactei.  How  speedily  a  mass  of  basalt,  even  one  hundred 
a&d  eighty  feet  in  depth,  may  have  been  ejected,  let  any  one 
rawer  for  himself  who  has  studied  the  history  of  volcanic 
eruptions,  and  remembers,  among  other  examples,  Hercula- 
1 1  um  and  Pompeii.  But  we  are  not  even  called  on  seriously 
'  discuss  this  latter  case  until  we  have  more  substantial  proof 
•  f  hi  genuineness.     As  to  Professor  "Whitney's  skull,  the  re- 

tfka  of  Professor  Blake  when  it  was  exhibited,  but  more 
;  uticularly  those  of  Professor  Silliman,  of  New  Haven,  who 
u  personally  explored  the  region  where  the  skull  was  found, 
•ere  calculated  to  throw  discredit  on  it.  But  beyond  this,  the 
*ritcr  of  this  article  has  evidence  from  a  seemingly  trust- 
*"rthy  source  which  points  to  the  whole  matter  as  a  hoax,  of 
which  Professor  Whitney  is  the  victim. 

Sncli  are  the  principal  special  cases  bearing  on  the  antiquity 

1  man  which  have  recently  come  to  light.     Here  we  might 

'•  rminate  our  survey;  but  as  the  decision  turns  on  the  rapidity 

*ilh  which  geological  changes  have  occurred,  we  next  offer 

'•<'  facts  which  tend  to  throw  further  light  on  this  general 
yotion. 

to  3S37  and  1840  six  fossil  trees  were  found  in  the  coal 
Wdj  of  Lancashire,  England,  where  they  are  divided  by  the 
'  ••■  of  the  Bolton  railway.  They  were  all  vertical  to  the  strata, 
*&d  their  roots  imbedded  in  a  soft  argillaceous  shale.    One  tree 

locirrii  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 8 


118  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  [January, 

was  fifteen  and  a  half  feet  in  diameter  at  the  base,  seven  and  a 
half  feet  at  the  top,  and  eleven  feet  high.  In  183S  four  upright 
aig Marias  were  found  piercing  the  coal  measures  near  Capcl 
Ccelbron,  in  Wales.  One  was  thirteen  and  a  half  feet  high, 
and  terminated  in  a  layer  of  coal.  In  the  Newcastle  colliery 
not  less  than  thirty  sigillarise  were  found  on  a  space  fifty  yards 
square.  Some  were  four  or  five  feet  in  diameter,  and  the  roots 
of  one  was  imbedded  naturally  in  shale.  For  some  distance  it 
maintained  a  position  vertical  to  the  strata,  and  then  was  sud- 
denly bent  at  right  angles  and  flattened  out  in  a  horizontal 
position  parallel  to  the  strata.  In  a  remarkable  case  at  Wol- 
verhampton, England,  seventy-three. trees  were  found  on  a 
quarter  of  an  acre  imbedded  in  the  shales  and  sandstones  of 
the  coal  measures.  Most  of  the  trunks  were  prostrate,  and 
though  several  feet  in  diameter,  were  flattened  to  less  than 
two  inches  in  thickness.  Some,  however,  stood  upright,  and 
in  most  cases  the  roots  were  attached,  and  formed  part  of  a 
bed  of  coal  which  rested  on  a  thin  layer  of  clay.  Below  this 
another  forest,  on  a  seam  of  coal  two  feet  thick,  and  then  five 
feet  lower,  another  forest.  M.  Alex.  Brogniart  gives  an  ac- 
count of  the  remains  of  certain  bamboo-like  trees  {equiseta)  at 
St.  Etienne,  near  Lyons,  France,  which  stand  upright  in  solid 
sandstone,  and  are  many  feet  in  height. 

At  a  place  called  "  South  Jogging,"  near  the  Bay  of  Fu-ndy, 
in  Nova  Scotia,  a  vast  formation,  four  thousand  five  hundred 
and  fifteen  feet  in  thickness,  of  alternating  layers  of  shales, 
sandstones,  and  coal  seams,  is  found.  Sir  W.  E.  Logan  dis- 
covered trees  there  at  no  less  than  seventeen  different  levels; 
some  stood  with  a  vertical  height  of  twenty-five  feet,  piercing 
the  layers  of  shale  and  sandstone,  but  never  passed  through 
coal  seams.  In  a  thickness  of  one  thousand  four  hundred  feet 
evidence  of  root-bearing  soils  was  found  at  sixty-eight  different 
levels. 

At  Craigleith  quarry,  near  Edinburgh,  Scotland,  the  trunk 
of  a  tree  seventy  feet  long  was  found  in  a  somewhat  inclined 
position  embedded  in  solid  silicious  sandstone.  In  the  same 
vicinity,  and  in  the  same  kind  of  stone,  Hugh  Miller  found 
four  trees  standing  in  an  inclined  position,  one  of  them  sixty 
<itid  another  seventy  feet  in  length.  Finally,  if  we  read  Sir 
Charles  Lyell  aright,  (from  whose  writings  most  of  the  facta  *"" 


1 S69J       Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.  119 

tht'f  paragraph  are  taken,)  in   1829,  at  Gosforth,  near  New- 

;!,■,  a  tree  was  discovered  piercing  through  the  strata  of 
*.':;.(  shales  and  sandstones  to  the  altitude  of  seventy-two  feet, 
i'..  these  very  many  other  facts  of  like  kind,  and  equally  strik- 
|np,  could  be  added. 

I'.ut  enough  has  been  given  to  show,  what  has  usually  been 
overlooked,  that  geological  changes,  even  in  the  formation 
of  the  sedimentary  rocks,  have  often  taken  place  with  startling 
rapidity.  The  imbedded  trees  to  which  we  have  referred  had 
but  little  durability,  many  of  them  not  more  than  the  palms 
U  to-day.  To  cover  up  such  a  tree  to  the  depth  of  seventy- 
two  feet,  and  yet  leave  the  top  as  free  from  evidences  of  decay 
u  the  lower  end,  it  is  manifest  but  little  time  could  be  given 
—at  most  only  a  few  years. 

What  then,  in  brief,  are  the  conclusions  we  seem  permitted 
lo  draw  in  the  light  of  recent  facts  ?     They  are : 

).  That  man  and  the  mammoth  in  some  parts  of  the  globe 
*«cre  contemporaneous. 

2.  That  instead  of  carrying  man  back  to  the  period  in  time 
formerly  assigned  to  the  mammoth  and  other  great  extinct 
;  kcbyderms,  we  are  required,  rather,  to  bring  the  mammoth 
down  to  the  period  of  man. 

3.  While  we  feel  by  no  means  necessitated  to  stand  up  for 
lira  six  thousand  years  of  the  accepted  chronology,  yet  we  are 
permitted  to  conclude  that  those  deposits  in  which  remains  of 

•  '!  have  been  found,  may  in  all  fairness  have  been  formed 
within  that  period.  We  may  safely  go  beyond  this,  and  say, 
ihe  Tacts  not  only  show  such  may  have  been,  but  in  all  proba- 
bility such  was,  the  case. 

•*•  That  the  knowledge  we  have  of  the  dynamical  geology 
•  I  the  various  superficial  formations  from  the  pleistocene 
■pward,  is  not  such  as  to  enable  us  to  reach  reliable  conclu- 
'  »M  as  to  past  time.  This  is  a  work  of  the  future.  Much 
been  done.  But  it  may  become  evident  to  any  one  who 
-v*  even  a  moderate  acquaintance  with  geology,  that  our 
knowledge  of  much  that  pertains  to  the  tertiary  and  qua- 
ternary groups  has  only  seen  a  respectable  beginning. 

5.  That  geological  changes  have  taken  place  with  a  rapidity 
lf:  the  past  seldom,  if  ever  witnessed  at  the  present. 

There1  is  every  reason   to  expect  that  this  question  of  the 


120  Geological  Evidences  of  Antiquity  of  Man.   (January, 

"  Antiquity  of  Man,"  which  has  unfortunately  been  pressed 
into  the  service  of  unbelief,  will  share  the  fate  of  hundreds 
of  others,  which  were  once  the  occasions  of  conflict,  but  have 
only  served  to  correct  mutually  the  too  hasty  interpretations 
which  men  have  endeavored  to  fasten  alike  on  the  "word" 
and  "  works  "  of  God. 

It  will  only  help  to  show  that,  however  deeply  science  and 
religion  may  differ  in  aim,  method,'  and  results,  yet  when 
fairly  construed  they  will  never  contradict,  because  correlates 
from  the  same  Divine  hand. 


Aet.  VII.— FOREIGN  RELIGIOUS  INTELLIGENCE. 


PROTESTANTISM. 

SPAIN. 
An  Opening  for  Protestantism — 
Preparations  for  Building  Protest- 
ant Churches— Efforts  of  English 
and  American  Societies. — One  of  the 
greatest  among  the  many  victories 
which  the  cause  of  religious  toleration 
has  of  late  gained  in  Europe  is  the  over- 
throw of  religious  fanaticism  in  Spain 
by  the  revolution  of  September,  18CS. 
Spain,  until  the  outbreak  of  the  recent 
revolution,  was  by  far  the  most  intoler- 
ant country  in  Europe.  Even  in  Rome 
and  the  Papal  States  Protestants  were 
not  so  severely  dealt  with  as  in  Spain. 
The  holding  of  Protestant  meetings,  the 
circulation  and  possession  of  Protestant 
books,  and  even  of  unauthorized  versions 
of  the  Bible,  subjected  every  Spaniard  to 
the  heaviest  punishment,  and  the  history 
of  Matamoras  and  other  martyrs  of  re- 
cent date  is  ample  proof  that  the  Spanish 
laws  with  regard  to  this  subject  did  not 
remain  a  dead-letter.  All  this  has  now 
ceased.  All  the  leaders  of  the  revolu- 
tionary movement  have  very  emphati- 
cally declared  themselves  in  favor  of  re- 
ligious freedom,  and  wherever  the  people 
Lave  made  any  public  demonstration 
with  regard  to"  the  subject  they  have 
approved  the  opinions  of  their  leaders. 
Porn  four  cities — Madrid,  Seville,  Bar- 
celona, and  Gerona — it  is  already  re- 
ported that  permission  has  been  asked 
and  gruJted  to  erect  Protestant  churches, 
and  many  others  are  expected  soon  to 
follow.  All  tho  liberal  partios — the  Lib- 
eral Union,  tho  Progressistas,  and  the 


Democrats — have  so  emphatically  de- 
clared themselves  in  favor  of  establish- 
ing religious  toleration  that  the  coming 
Constituent  Assembly  may  confidently 
be  expected  to  throw  the  gates  of  tho 
country  wide  open  to  peaceable  citizens 
of  every  religious  creed. 

Protestantism  is  not  an  entire  stranger 
to  the  Spanish  people. 

The  Spaniards  who  are  familiar  with 
the  history  of  their  country  know  that 
in  the  sixteenth  century  the  Reforma- 
tion was  as  gladly  welcomed  by  their 
ancestors  as  in  any  of  the  other  Euro- 
pean countries.  So  rapid,  indeed,  was 
its  progress  that  it  would  have  required 
but  a  short  period  of  freedom  to  root 
itself  in  the  country  forever.  Large 
numbers  of  Protestant  Spanish  books 
were  printed  at  Antwerp  at  the  expense 
of  Spanish  merchants,  and  imported  into 
Spain.  Alfonso  Yaldez,  Secretary  of 
the  Emperor  Charles  V. ;  Alfonso  de 
Virves,  who  subsequently  became  Bishop 
of  the  Canary  Islands;  Juan  Valdez, 
the  Secretary  of  the  Viceroy  of  Naples, 
professed  reformatory  sentimeuts  soon 
after  the  public  appearance  of  Luther, 
lu  1543  a  translation  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment was  published  by  Francisco  Enzi- 
nas,  better  known  under  the  name  ut 
Dryander;  in  15G9  a  translation  of  the 
whole  Bible  was  published  by  Cassio- 
doro  do  Reyr.a.  Protestant  congrega- 
tions were  established  in  Seville,  Vallo- 
dolid,  and  a  number  of  other  cities;  but 
soon  tho  further  progress  of  the  Bel  or- 
mation  was  arrested  by  tho  cruelties  ol 
the  Inquisition.  Tho  worst  kinv  ■  that 
have  lived    in  Europe  during  tl  -  h'*1 


1SC9.1 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


121 


\\ i i  ^hundred  rears  worked  together  with 
Iho  most  bloodthirsty  fanatics  that  have 
ever  disgraced  the  Dame  of  Christianity 

Id  eradicate  Protestantism.  In  no  coun- 
try of  Europe  were  so  many  heretics 
burned  as  in  Spain.  Thus  the  Reforma- 
tion in  1570  was  entirely  suppressed. 
Only  in  a  Cow  foreign  cities,  as  Antwerp, 
Geneva,  and  London,  small  colonies  of 
refugees  kept  up  the  history  of  Spanish 
Protestantism.  In  Spain  itself,  for  more 
than  two  hundred  years,  no  serious  ef- 
forts could  be  made  to  re-establish  the 
reformed  faith. 

In  the  present  century  the  liberal  ad- 
ministrations which  Spain  enjoyed  at 
intervals  encouraged  English  and  Amer- 
ican missionaries  to  circulate  the  Bible. 
The  Bishops  showed  to  all  these  at- 
tempts the  most  determined  opposition  ; 
and  Queen  Isabella  did  her  best  to  bring 
back  the  worst  days  of  the  Inquisition. 
By  means  of  reading  the  Bible  a  number 
of  Spaniards  had  secretly  embraced  the 
principles  of  Protestantism,  and  became 
in  turn  active  in  the  propagation  of 
Bible  truth.  Against  them  the  govern- 
ment proceeded  with  consummate  cruel- 
ty, and  years  of  imprisonment  and  exile 
awaited  every  one  who  was  found  to- 
possess  or  to  read  the  Bible  or  a  Prot- 
estant book,  or  to  take  part  in  a  Prot- 
estant  meeting.  Even  foreign  Protest- 
ant residents  were  not  allowed  the  free 
exercise  of  their  religion.  Notwith- 
standing all  this  persecution  there  are 
to-day  large  numbers  of  secret  Protest- 
ants in  Spain. 

GERMANY. 
The  General  Lutheran  Conference 
AT   Hanover.— On  the  first  of  July  a! 
General  Conference  of  delegates  from  all  I 
Hio  Lutheran  Churches  of  Germany  was  J 
oponed  at   Hanover.     This   is  the  first  J 
meetings  of  the  kind  that  has  yet  been  '■ 
"eld,  and  is  likely  to  organize  a  move- 
ment which  must  effect  a  radical  trans- 
formation in  the  Protestant  State  Church- 
es of  Germany.     At  present  Germany 
has    three    different     Protestant    State  ! 
Churches,   namely:    1.    The   Lutheran, 
-•The  Reformed,  3.  The  United  Evan- 
gelical.    The  latter  consists  of  a  union  j 
Lutherans  and    Reformed,   and    was 
established  in  1811  by  a  decree  of  the' 

k'Bg  Of  Prussia.  Nearly  the  whole 
jrotestant  population  of  Prussia,  of 
JKwen,  and  of  a  number  of  the  North 
i»miqwi  States,  and.  altogether,  a  large 
majority  of  the   Protestant  population 


!  of  Germany,  belong  to  it.  The  Reformed 
State  Church  of  Germany  has  been 
j  almost  absorbed  by  it.  Among  the 
j  Lutheran  Churches  which  opposed  the 
union  of  the  two  Churches  are  those  of 
Bavaria,  (except  in  the  Province  of  the 
Palatinate,  where  the  Union  is  intro- 
duced,) Wvrrtemberg,  Saxony,  Hanove:, 
Schleswig-Holstein,  and  Mecklenburg. 
In  Prussia  a  small  number  of  Lutherans, 
who  protested  against  the  Union,  have 
established  a  Lutheran  Pree  Church. 
Within  the  United  Evangelical  Church 
of  Prussia,  and  other  countries,  there  is 
a  considerable  Lutheran  party  which 
views  the  United  Evangelical  Church 
only  as  an  outward  confederation  of  two 
independent  Protestant  Churches,  under 
the  authority  of  one  Protestant  govern- 
ment, and  which  wishes  to  be  regarded 
as  a  real  Lutheran  Church  within  the 
Union.  When,  in  1866,  Hanover  and 
Schleswig-Holstein  were  annexed  to 
Prussia,  it  was  feared  by  Lutherans 
of  all  parties  that  the  Prussian  govern- 
ment, would  make  efforts  to  force  this 
union  upon  the  Lutheran  Church  of 
these  provinces.  This  fear  suggested 
the  plan  of  a  conference  of  men  of  all 
Lutheran  Churches.  The  idea  met  with 
general  approval,  and  accordingly,  the 
first  General  Lutheran  Conference  at 
Hanover  was  largely  attended.  Three 
classes  of  Churches  were  represented : 
1.  The  avowedly  Lutheran  State  Church- 
es  of  Bavaria,  Wurtemberg,  Saxony,  and 
other  States.  2.  The  Free  Lutheran 
Churches  of  Prussia  and  of  other  State3, 
which  recognize  the  United  Evangelical 
Church  as  the  only  State  Church.  3.  The 
Lutheran  party  in  the  United  Evan- 
gelical Church.  Dr.  von  Harless,  well- 
known  as  one  of  the  promiuent  theo- 
logians of  the  Lutheran  Church,  and 
now  president  of  the  Supreme  Ecclesi- 
astical Council  of  Bavaria,  and  m 
of  the  First  Chaluber  of  Bavaria,  was 
chosen  president.  A  number  of  theo- 
logians known  to  the  entire  Protestant 
world  by  their  writings  were  pn 
Among  them  were,  Dr.  Kliefoth,  Dr. 
Luthardt,  Dr.  von  rlofmann,  Dr.  K 
Dr.  Uhlhorn,  Dr.  Thomasius.  The 
following  resolutions,  which  defini 
relation  of  the  German  Lutl  eran  Church* 
es  to  the  other  Protestant  State  Church* 

es  and  t<>   the   Protestatlt   .Slate  govern 
ments,  were  unanimously  adopted: 

1.  Sufficient,  but  at  (lie  same  time 
indispensable  for  the  true  idea  of  liio 
Church,    is  an   agreement   in    the   trim 


122 


Foreign,  Religions  Intelligence. 


[Jann 


arv. 


doctrine  and  in  the  administration  of  the 
sacraments  as  -we  find  them  expressed 
in  the  Confessions  of  the  Lutheran 
Church. 

2.  The  Church  government,  being  an 
important  member  of  the  Church,  is 
also  included  in  the  demand  of  an  agree- 
ment in  true  doctrine  and  in  the  admin- 
istration of  sacraments  with  the  Church 
which  it  is  to  govern. 

3.  It  is  therefore  inadmissible  to 
unite  Churches  by  means  of  one  Church 
government,  without  agreement  in  doe- 
trine  and  the  administration  of  sacra- 
ments. 

4.  For  the  same  reason,  the  right  can- 
not be  conceded  to  the  ruler  of  a 
country  to  dissolve  ecclesiastical  terri- 
tories "which  may  fall  to  him,  without 
regard  to  their  doctrine  and  administra- 
tion of  sacraments,  into  the  whole  of 
the  State  Churches,  in  such  a  manner 
that  such  Churches  would  only  continue 
to  exist  within  the  State  Church  as  in- 
dividual congregations  with  their  private 
doctrine  and  administration  of  sacra- 
ments." 

The  German  Lutherans  arc  nearly 
unanimous  in  regarding  a  Lutheran  State 
Church  as  the  best  form  of  Church 
government;  but,  rather  than  consent  to 
tho  establishment  of  a  union  with  the 
Reformed  Church,  they  would  generally 
prefer  the  establishment  of  independent 
Lutheran  Churches. 

S\YEDEX. 
The  First  General  Synod  of  the 
Swedish  State  Chl'kch. — Among  the 
notable  events  in  the  history  of  the 
Protestant  Churches  of  the  year  18G8 
we  must  mention  the  meeting  of  the 
first  General  Svnod  of  the  Lutheran 
State  Church  of  Sweden.  This  Church, 
almost  more  than  any  of  the  Protestant 
Churches  originating  in  the  sixteenth 
century,  has  suffered,  from  an  undue 
influence  upon  its  affairs  by  tho  State 
government.  The  bishops  and  repre- 
sentatives of  the  clergy  constituted, 
according  to  the  former  Swedish  Con- 
stitution, one  of  the  four  estates  of  the 
kingdom.  The  new  Swedish  constitu- 
tion, which  was  adopted  in  1867,  sub- 
stituted fur  the  four  estates  two  cham- 
bers: and  in  article  88,  while  leaving  the 
ecclesiastical  legislation  in  the  hand-; 
of  the  Diet  and  the  King,  made  the 
validity  of  all  resolutions  passed  with 
regard  to  ecclesiastical  affairs  de- 
pendent upon  the  consent  of  the  Gen- 


eral Synod.  The  King  shall  possess  the 
right  of  interpretinir  the  Church  laws, 
until  the  adoption  of  a  different  inter- 
pretation by  the  General  Synod.  The 
establishment  of  the  General  Synod 
dates  from  the  royal  decree  of  November 
16,  1SG3.  It  shall  consist  of  the  Arch- 
bishop of  Upsala,  the  eleven  Bishops  of 
the  kingdom,  four  Professors  of  the 
Theological  Faculty,  the  Pastor  Prima- 
rius  of  Stockholm,  of  thirty  clergymen, 
to  be  elected  severally  by  the  clergy 
of  the  thirty  ecclesiastical  districts,  and 
of  thirty  laymen,  to  be  elected  in  as 
many  electoral  districts.  The  Synod 
shall"  meet  every  fifth  year.  The  Min- 
ister of  Public  "\Yorsbip  has  a  right  to  be 
present  at  the  meetings,  but  has  no 
vote.  The  opening  took  place  with 
great  pomp  on  September  5.  The  gov- 
ernment laid  ten  different  propositions 
before  tho  Synod. 

EOMAN  CATHOLICISM. 

TrtE  (Ecumenical  Council — Letters 
from  the  Pope  to  the  Oriental  Bisu- 
ors  and  the  Protestants  — Replus 
from  the  Oriental  and  Protestant 
Churches. — In  the  Church  history  of  the 
current  year  the  preparations  for  and 
the  discussion  of  this  (Ecumenical  Coun- 
cil, which  has  been  convoked  by  the 
Pope  to  meet  at  Rome  on  the  8th  of  De- 
cember, 18G9,  will  occupy  a  prominent 
place.  By  addressing  letters  to  all  the 
Christian  bodies  which  are  not  in  union 
with  Rome  the  Pope  has  awakened  a 
general  interest  in  the  subject,  and  elic- 
ited several  replies.  In  the  preceding 
number  of  the  " Methodist  Quarterly  Re- 
view "  we  have  given  the  substance  of  the 
Pope's  circular  letter  to  the  Roman  Cath- 
olic Bishops  convoking  the  Council. 

The  invitation  in  the  Papal  letter  to 
the  Oriental  Bishops  is  thus  expressed : 

Now,  as  lately,  with  the  advice  of  our 
venerable  brothers,  the  Cardinals  of  the 
holv  Roman  Church,  we  have  indicated 
and"  convoked  an  (Ecumenical  Council, 
to  be  opened  in  Rome  on  December  s 
of  next  year,  the  Feast  of  the  Immacu- 
late Conception  of  the  Blessed  Virgin, 
i  Mother  of  God,  we  address  our  word*  to 
I  you  again,  and  we  conjure,  warn,  au  I 
entreat  you,  with  all  the  earnestness  we 
!  are  capable  of,  to  come  to  this  -''' 
1  general  assembly,  as  did  your  ancestors 
to  the  Council  of  Lyons,  held  under  U ■■' 
;  blessed  Gregory  X..  our  predecessor  u 
venerable  memory,  and  to  the  Counc  ■ 
of  Floreuce,  celebrated  by  Eugeuius  1^  •- 
[also  our  predecessor  of  happy  memorji 


1S09J 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


123 


t.»  ihc  cml  that  renewing  the  laws  of  an- 

.  ...,t  love,  and  restoring  to  its  vigor  the 
t.  *.v  of  our  fathers,  that  celestial  and 
Military  (rift  of  Jesus  Christ,  of  which  in 
timr  we  have  lost  the  fruits,  we  may  see 


in  1S48,  his  Holiness  had  sent  a  similar 
invitation,  and  the  Eastern  Church  had 
met  it  with  an  encyclical  explaining  how 
widely  its  principles  differed  from  those 
of  Rome;    and    this    explanation    bad 


,:  .,-!,  after  a  long  period  of  grief,  in   greatly  afflicted  his  Holiness,  as  his  reply 

■I  rti  darkuess  and  division  prevailed    sufficiently  indicated.      "  As,  moreover, 

— we  may  see  arise  the  brilliaut  and  pure    his  Holiness  does  not  seem  to  have  de- 

Boruiug  which  we  so  long  have  prayed  i  viated  from  his  principles,"  added  the 

i  r.  ;  Patriarch,    "and   as   we    on    our    side, 

Given  at  Rome,  at  St.  Peter's,  Septem-    thanks  be  to   God!    have  not  deviated 

u  r  8,  IS68,  in  the  twenty-third  year  of  from  ours,  we  have  as  little  desire  to 

oar  Pontificate.  j  vainly  cause  him  fresh  sorruwas  to  open 

I  old  sores."    A  discussion  then  followed, 

I|  was  from  the  beginning  expected  by  |  in  which  the  Patriarch  maintained  that 

B  »man  Catholic  writers  that  no  Bishop  j  it  was  not  the  Greek  Church,  but   the 

•  f  Russia  would  be  permitted  bv  the  Em-  '  Roman    Church,    which    had    departed 

i*ror  to  altend  the  Council.     It  was  also    from   apostolical  doctrine,   and   denied 

the  right  of  the  Pope  even  to  summon 
an  (Ecumenical  Council  on  his  own  au- 
thority. At  the  conclusion  of  the  inter- 
view the  invitation  was  handed  back  to 
the.  Papal  envoys,  who  thereupon  took 
their  leave. 


idered  as  probable  that  Russian  in 
fliience  would  be  strong  enough  in  Gallah 
l  •  prevent  the  attendance  of  the  Greek- 
Bishops.  But  very  sanguine  hopes  were 
ralertained  with  regard  to  the  Eastern 
Churches  of  Turkey.  Leading  Roman 
Catholic  papers  gave  it  as  their  opinion 
'.  it  as  many  as  one  hundred  Bishops  of 
■•  e  Eastern  Churches  might  appear  in 
Rome  and  take  part  in  the  Council,  and 
U»  most  extravagant  hopes  were  in- 
d  rtged  in  in  regard  to  a  union  between 
the  Eastern  and  the  Roman  Catholic 
Churches.  But  the  official  accounts  from 
I  •  heads  of  the  Greek  and  Armenian 
'.lurches  have  by  this  time- thoroughly 
i  'posed  of  these  extravagant  hopes. 
• :  ••  letter  from  the  Pope  was  officially 
presented  to  the  Greek  Patriarch  of 
I  '•  ••-t.mtinople  by  four  envoys,  at  the 
I  tad  of  whom  was  the  Roman  Catholic 
an  bbtshop  of  Constantinople.  The  fol- 
1  »wing  account  of  the  interview  is  given 
br  ihc  "Turquie,"  a  semi-official  paper 
rf  the  Turkish  Government  published 
1  Constantinople,  and  the  "Xord,"  a 
Mini-official  organ  of  the  Russian  Gov- 

•  rument,  published  in  Brussels,  declares 
•**  ■'■  able  to  vouch  for  the  correctness 
w  the  report.     The  "  Turquie  "  says : 

The  envoys  were  very  cordially  re- 
■'■»'l,  and  one  of  them  at  once"  pro- 
*-;"'  '1  the  letter,  richly  bound  in  pam- 
'  '■  '  I  form,  and  Stated  its  purport  in  a 
j«*  brief  words.  The  Patriarch  did  not 
Uke  the  letter,  but  motioned  the  speaker 
"J  put  it  down.     He  then  explained  at 

•  nie  length  the  reasons  whv  be  could 
^•ccept  the  invitation.     He  had  al- 
ba said,   been    made   acquainted 

with  the  principl 


'•'•  l*be  newspa] 
e*I»rfaaed  in  thi 
"  in  aa  they  were  diametrically  opposed  , 

>•  Uioae  of  the  Orthodox  Eastern  Church,  |  ^>ld' 
ith  sincere  borrow  that  he  WHS 


The  presentation  of  the  letter  to  the 
Armenian  Patriarch  was  not  more  effect- 
ive. The  "Patriarch,  it  is  said,  was  less 
decided  in  his  rejection  of-  the  invitation, 
but  he  referred  the  envoys  to  the  chief 
head  of  the  Armenians,  the  Catholicos 
of  Etchmiadsin.  As  the  latter  is  a  sub- 
ject of  Russia,  it  must,  on  that  account 
alone,  be  expected  that,  as  far  as  his  in- 
fluence extends,  the  Armenian  Church 
will  not  be  represented  at  the  Roman 
Catholic  Council.  There  may  be  a  dis- 
position on  the  part  of  a  few  Oriental 
Bishops  to  accept  the  Pope's  invitation, 
but  it  is  highly  probable  that  the  Epis- 
copal representatives  of  the  Eastern 
Churches  at  Rome,  if  there  will  be  any, 
will  be  very  few. 

Outside  of  the  communion  of  Rome 
there  is  only  one  Church  which  has  a 
numerous  party  desiring  participation 
in  the  Roman  Catholic  Council,  with  the 
avowed  hope  that  such  a  step  may  re- 
move all  barriers  that  now  delay  their 
full  union  with  Rome.  We  refer  to  the 
extreme  party  among  the  Ritualists  of  the 
Anglican  Church.  This  party,  in  1S57, 
established  an  "Association  fur  Promot- 
ing the  Unity  of  Christendom,"  the  mem- 
bers of  which  pledge  themselves  to  recite 
a  daily  prayer  for  the  union  of  Christen- 
dom, meaning,  in  particular,  the  union 
of  the  Roman  Catholic,  the  Eastern,  and 
the  Anglican  Churches.  From  1SJ7  to 
I  September   1868,  12,684  members  have 


L?L^™oc"i|been    enrolled,  of  whom   1,831,  wo  ar 
belong    to    the     Roman   Catholic 
Church    in   various    countries,   033    aro 


unable  lo  subscribe  to  them.    Already,  j  Orientals,  92  are  attached   to   miscella- 


124 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence.  [Jan nary 


Deems  communities,  and  10.02G  belong] 
to  the  Church  of  England,  anrl  other  | 
Churches  in  communion  with  the  same,  j 
It  is  quite  common  among  the  clergy- 
men of  this  school  to  recognize  an  hon-  j 
orary  primacy  of  the  Bishop  of  Rome  j 
over  the  whole  Church,  and  a  virtual  J 
conformity  between  the  doctrine  of 
Home  and  the  doctrine  of  the  Anglican 
Church,  as  they  understand  them.  They  j 
hoped  that  the  Bishops  of  the  Anglican  | 
Churches  would  be  invited,  with  the  j 
Oriental  Bishops,  to  take  part  in  the  pro- 1 
ceedings  of  the  Council,  and  that  some 
of  the  Anglican  Bishops  might  be  pre-  j 
vailed  upon  to  attend.  This  hone  has  i 
not  been  realized,  as  the  Anglicans  in 
Rome  are  viewed  not  as  schismatics,  j 
but  as  heretics ;  but  nevertheless  the 
clergymen  of  the  party  have  been  urging 
their  faithful  followers  to  pray  for  the  | 
success  of  the  (Ecumenical  Council,  espe- 
cially in  regard  to  the  union  of  the 
Anglican  and  Roman  Catholic  Churches. 
The  following  are  extracts*  from  the 
letter  addressed  by  the  Pope  to  all  the 
Protestant  and  non-Catholic  bodies: 

Instigated  and  encouraged  by  the  char- 
ity of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  who  laid  down 
bis  life  for  the  salvation  of  the  world,  we 
cannot  forbear,  on  the  occasion  of  the 
meeting  of  the  next  Council,  addressing 
our  apostolic  and  paternal  word  to  aii 
those  who,  while  recognizing  that  same 
Jesus  Christ  as  our  Saviour,  and  rejoicing 
in  the  name  of  Christians,  yet  still  do  not 
profess  the  veritable  faith  of  Christ,  nor 
follow  the  communion  of  the  Catholic 
Church.  And  if  we  do  so,  it  is  before 
all  to  warn,  exhort,  and  supplicate  them 
with  all  our  zeal  ami  all  our  charity  to 
consider  and  seriously  examine  if  they 
in  truth  follow  the  path  prescribed  by 
our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  and  which  leads 
to  eternal  happiness.  In  fact,  no  one 
can  deny  our  dnnbt  that  Jesus  Christ 
himself,  in  order  that  all  future  human 
pent-rations  should  enjoy  the  fruit  of  his 
redemption,  !>nilt  up  here  below  his 
Church  ia  the  person  of  Peter,  that  is 
to  say,  the  Church,  one,  Holy, Catholic, 
and  Apostolic, 

Now,  wbos  lever  wishes  well  to  con- 
sider and  examine  with  attention  the  dif- 
ferent religious  societies  divided  among 
themselves  and  separated  from  the  Cath- 
olic Church  which,  Bince  the  time,  of  the 
Lord  Jesus  Christ  and  his  Apostles,  has 
always  uninterruptedly  exercised,  and 
r-till  exercise*,  by  means  of  its  legitimate 
Pastors,  the  power  intrusted  to  her  by 
our  Lord  himself  -whoever,  we  say, 
shall  thus  examine  \\  L* I  easily  convince 
himself  that  nol  one  of  those  religious 
societies,  nor  all  the  religious  societies 


together,  constitutes,  or  in  any  way  can 
be  considered  as,  the  one  and  only  Cat ii- 
olic  Church  which  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ 
founded,  constituted,  and  desired;  sbordd 
wish  that  they  cannot  in  auy  way  be  re- 
garded as  a  member  or  as  a  part  of  t::  ; 
same  Church,  because  they  are  visibly 
separated  from  all  Catholic  unity.  As 
in  fact  those  societies  are  deprived  of 
that  living  authority  established  by  God, 
who  pointed  out  to  mankind  before  all 
things  the  matter  of  faith  and  the  rule  of 
morality,  who  directed  and  presided  over 
them  in  all  things  affecting  their  eternal 
welfare,  therefore  those  societies  them- 
selves constantly  varied  in  their  doc- 
trine, and  this  mobility,  this  instability, 
is  unceasing.  Every  one  can  easily  com- 
prehend that  this  state  of  things  is  alto- 
gether opposed  to  the  Church  established 
by  Christ  our  Lord,  a  Church  in  which 
the  truth  must  always  rest  unaltered, 
without  being  the  subject  of  any  change, 
as  a  charge  intrusted  to  that  same 
Church  in-order  that  she  may  preserve 
it  in  all  its  integrity,  a  charge  for  the 
care  of  which  the  presence  of  the  Holy 
Ghost,  and  its  aid,  has  been  granted  for- 
ever to  this  Church. 

Given  at  Rome,  at  St.  Peter's,  Septem- 
ber 13,  1^'JS,  in  the  twenty-third  year  of 
our  Pontificate. 

As  was  to  be  expected,  the  letter  had 
not  produced  any  effect.     It  has  gener- 
ally been  recognized  that  the  toue  of  this 
letter  is  much  less  arrogant  and  insult- 
ing with  regard  to  Protestantism  than 
the  great  majority  of  the  documents  em- 
anating from  the  Pone.     It  deserves,  in 
particular,  recognition  that  the  Pop?  re- 
members   that    Protestants    "  rcc  . 
the  same  Jesus  Chris:  as  Saviour.''    Bui 
as  the  Pope  does  not  moderate  the 
matical  claims  of  his  Church,  all  the  no- 
tice Protestants  could  take  of  his  letter 
was  a  reassertion  of  their  own  position. 
V  few  Protestant  bodies  have  made  a 
formal    reply,  as  the    Protestant  S 
Church    of   Prussia.     The   members   of 
the  Tate  Triennial  Episcopal  Convention 
have  signed  a  letter  to  the  Poi-e  i:i  reply 
to  his  invitation.     The  General   Council 
of  the  Lutheran  Church,  at   its   i 
meeting  at  Pittsburgh,  lias  like 
pointed  a  con.  .  .  ■  r  it. 

The  weightiest  response  to  the  Pope's 
letter  will  be  issued  from  the  next  Gen- 
eral Assembly  of  the  World's  Evangeli- 
cal Alliance.  "  Through  it  the  Pi 
world  will  reply  to  the  Roman  Cat 
At  the  fifth  assembly  of  the  Alliance. 
'held  at  Amsterdam,  it  was  intimated 
that  the  sixth  assembly  might  be  hold 
in    New    York.       Consequently    soma 


I  SCO.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


125 


go  the  Committee  of  the  Amer- 
.-.   branch  extended  an  invitation  to 
-.  •    European    branches   to   hold  (heir 
ting  in  America,  and  this  invi- 
was  cordially  accepted.     Subse- 
bweotlr,  a  letter  was  received  from  the 
<  ■  uncil  of  the  English  branch  inquiring 
i .    iher  the  autumn  of  next  year  might 
i    t  bo  looked  to.  on  the  supposition  that 
instances  in  the  United  States  and 
. .  Europe  favor  it.  as  the  probable  time 
.  ng  the  Conference. 
At  a  meeting  of  the  prominent  men  of 
*.!*  American  branch,  held  in  New  York 
.     October,  the  Rev.  Dr.  M'Cosh,  for- 
merly   one    of  the    most    distinguished 
:  embers    of    the    Irish    Presbyterian 
•  burch,  and  of  the  English  branch  of 
i'.o  Alliance,  and  recently  installed  as 


President  of  Princeton  College,  spoke  of 
the  enthusiasm  with  which  the  Ameri- 
can invitation  had  been  received  at  Am- 
sterdam, aud  of  the  strong  desire  on  the 
part  of  the  most  eminent  men  of  learn- 
ing and  piety  on  the  Continent  aud  in 
Britain  to  hold  the  next  General  Council 
in  this  country.  Other  speakers  stated 
that  the  leading  German  and  French 
evangelical  scholars  and  divines,  aud 
distinguished  statesmen  and  clergymen 
from  England,  would  attend.  In  consid- 
eration of  all  these  facts  the  meeting 
unanimously  adopted  a  resolution  ap- 
proving the  plan  of  holding  the  next 
General  Conference  in  Xew  York  in 
October  of  1869,  and  pledging  its  co- 
operation to  the  American  branch  of  the 
Alliance  in  this  work. 


Art.  VIII.— FOREIGN  LITERARY  IXTELLIGEXCE. 


GERMANY. 

The  great  Protestant  Cyclopedia  of 
i:*.  Hvrzog.  by  far  the  largest  and  most 

■rned  work  which  Protestant  theology 
» -«  yet  produced,  is  now  complete  by 
1  a  publication  of  the  twenty-second 
* ••••inie,  containing  the  register,  [Thdo- 
9*  >«  Encyldopadie,  22  vols.  Gotha.) 
'••■<:  original  work  contains  eighteen  vol- 
•  - :  to  these  Lave  been  added  three 

•  ' ;  tementary   volumes,    and   one   vol- 

oontainiog  the  register.     For  theo- 

•  •■  v!:s  who  can  read  German  this  is  an 
^exhaustible  mine  of  valuable  informa- 

'•    :i   <>n  all   branches   of  theology.     A 

■  rable  amount  of  the  material  cou- 
'-'    ■•!  in  it  is,  however,  of  but  little  in- 

for  any  except  Germans.     A  con- 

•  ' ■•■  1  translation  of  it,  which  was  be- 
r  :i  s/.ine  years  ago  in  this  country,  has 

•  '•  discontinued  from  want  of  support. 

s  i '  »  ll    n  the  Cyclopaedia  of  Dr.  M'Clin- 

-  •  '•  ;:  i  Dr.  Strong  has  appeared,  which, 

*  '  ■■••  immense  majority  of  all  who  con- 

•-t  theological  Cyclopedias,  supersedes 

'■  •  W'.rW  of  Dr.  Herzog,  both  the  orig- 

'••  at.'l  the  translation. 

I   -  greatest  geographical  publishing 
•    ■■■'  the  world,  Justus  Perthes',  of] 

■  to  which  the  theological  world  is 

lebted  for  tho  excellent  mis- 

"!"  Dr.  Grundeman,  has  recently 

■  ■'  ■  new  Bible  atlas,  bv  Dr.  Theo- 


dor  Reake.  The  atlas  consists  of  the 
following  eight  maps:  1.  The  ethno- 
graphic map  of  Genesis;  2.  The  North- 
ern Semites  and  the  eastern  half  of 
the  Mediterranean;  3.  The  territories 
of  the  twelve  tribes  of  Israel  before 
the  exile ;  4.  Syria  and  Fboenicia  at  the 
time  of  the  Persian  empire ;  5.  Judea 
and  the  neighboring  countries  at  the 
time  of  Christ  and  the  Apostles  ;  6.  Pal- 
estine according  to  the  Onomasticon  of 
Eusebius  and  Jerome;  1.  The  Holy 
Land  at  the  time  of  the  Crusaders. 
8.  Palestine  at  the  present  time.  Every 
map  is  accompanied  by  a  number  of 
side  maps. 

Thus  there  are  side  maps  to  the  first 
map  representing  the  ethnographic  table 
of  Genesis  according  to  Joseph  US,  ex- 
planations from  Ptolemy,  the  map  of  the 
world  given  by  Cosmos  InJiaopleustes, 
two  maps  of  the  world  published  in  tho 
fourteenth  century,  the  parts  of  the 
world  which  were  known  to  the  Iliad 
and  the  Odyssey. 

Professor  Lipsius,  of  Kiel,  to  whom 
we  arc  already  indebted  for  several 
valuable  works  on  the  early  history  of 
the  Christian  Church,  has  published  new 
critical  researches  on  the  Lists  of  the 
early  Popes  as  they  are  found  in  the 
Chronicles  of  Eusebius,  and  of  the 
chronists  who  have  adopted  the  text  of 


126 


Foreign  Literary  Intelligence. 


[January, 


Eusebius.  (Die  Papstserzeichnisse  d*s 
Eusebius.  Kiel,  1SGS.)  The  author 
shows,  that  in  consequence  of  several 
revisions  of,  and  additions  to,  our 
original ' lists,  which  extended  to  the 
beginning  of  the  second  century,  there 
were  in  the  fourth  century  as  many  as 
five  lists  in  circulation. 

Professor  Heinichen.  who.  as  long  as 
forty-one  years  ago,  published  an  edition 
of  the  Church  Ilistory  of  Eusebius,  has 
now  begun  the  publication  of  a  complete 
edition  of  the  historical  works  of  Eu- 
sebius. The  first  volume  (Eusebii  I'am- 
ph  ilii  ffistmice  Ecclesiastics,  libri  X.  Leip- 
zig. 1863,)  is  a  thoroughly  revised  new 
edition  of  the  Church  History.  The 
second  volume  contains  the  life  of  Con- 
stantine.  (Vita  Constantine  et  Pancgyri- 
cus  atque  Coasiantini  ad  Sanctorum 
coetum  oratio.) 

A  special  essay  on  the  clause  "Descend- 
ed into  hell,"  in  the  Apostolic  creed, 
has  been  published  by  Professor  Alex- 
ander Schweizer,  well-known  as  one 
of  the  foremost  writers  on  the  doctrines 
of  the  Reformed  Church.  (Hinabgefahren 
zur  Holle.  Zurich.  18C8.)  The  author 
undertakes  to  prove  that  tnose  words 
do  not  mean  a  descent  of  Christ  into 
hell  after  his  death;  but,  in  accordance 
with  the  doctrine  of  the  old  Reformed 
Church,  wnich  has  of  late  been  re- 
adopted  by  Dr.  Hoffmann,  of  the  influ- 
ence of  the  pre-existent  Spirit  of  Christ 
at  the  time  of  the  deluge. 

A  work  on  me  policy  of  the  Popes 
from  Gregory  I.  to  Gregory  VII.  has 
been  begun  by  Professor  R.  Eaxmann. 
{Die  PoKtik  der  Papik  von  Gregor  I.  bis 
auf  Gregor  VII.  Klhp-ftjld,  1868.)  The 
work  will  be  eomjuen  in  two  volumes. 
The  same  author  has  published  a  bio- 
graphical sketch  of  Schleiermacher. 
(Fri-jbich  SchUiermacher.  Elberfckl, 
1868.)  , 

T.  Xoldeke,  the  author  of  an  extensive 
work  on  the  Koran,  has  published  a 
work  on  "  The  Old  Testament  Literature. 
in  a  series  of  Essays."  (Die  Alttesta- 
mentlicke  Literatw  in  Auhatsen.  Leip- 
zig, 1SS8.) 

A  new  manual  of  the  Biblical  The- 
ology of  the  Xcw  Testament  has  been 
published  bv  B.  Weiss.  (Lehrbuch  tier 
biU    Ttieoiogie.     Berlin,  18G8.) 

A  new  work  by  Karl  Zimmcrmann 
(the  founder  of  the  Gustavus  Adolphus 


j  Society)  treats  of  the  progress  of  the 
J  Evangelical  Church  in  Roman  .Catholic 
countries.-  (Die  evangel.  Diaspera. 
Darmstadt,  18C3.)  The  first  number 
treats  of  Protestantism  in  Austria. 

A  new  "  Introduction  into  the  Xew 
Testament "  (Einleitung  in  das  Neve  Tes- 
tament, Freiburg.  1S68)  has  been  pub- 
lished by  Dr.  Langen,  (Roman  Catholic.) 
Professor  of  Theology  at  the  University 
of  Bonn.  The  author,  like  some  other 
Roman  Catholic  theologians,  has  an 
elastic  view  of  inspiration;  so  much  so, 
that  the  episcopal  placet  was  given  to 
his  book  only  on  the  condition  that  be 
leave  out  some  sentences  setting  forth 
his  reasous  for  rejecting  the  verbal  in- 
spirations. 

HOLLAND. 

Among  the  Syriac  works  which  some 
years  ago  were  discovered  in  the  Ni- 
trian  Desert,  and  acquired  by  the  Brit- 
ish Museum  of  London,  few  were  so 
important  as  the  third  part  of  the 
Church  ff  story  of  Bishop  Johannes  of 
Ephesus,  which  has  been  published  by 
Cureton.  The  importance  of  this  work 
created  among  the  friends  of  Church 
history  a  desire  for  the  publication  of  all 
other  works  of  this  Bishop  that  are  still 
extant  in  manuscript.  This  wish  bag 
recently  been  fulfilled  by  J.  P.  X.  Land, 
who  in  Anecdota  Si/riaca.  vol.  ii.  (a!-o 
under  the  special  title  Joannis  Episcopi 
Monophysitae  Scripta  Historica,  Leyden, 
1SG3.)  has  published  all  the  ine 
works  of  Bishop  Joannes.  .  The  volume 
contains  a  few  more  fragments  of  the 
history,  and.  in  particular,  biographies 
of  Oriental  saints,  which  present  a  very 
pitiful  exhibition  of  asceticism  as  it  pre- 
vailed in  the  East  at  the  time  of  this 
author. 

GREECE. 

The  theologians  of  the  Greek  Church 
begin  to  discuss  the  question  of  an  inter- 
communion  between   the    Eastern    and 
the  Anglican  Churches.    Two  works  on 
the  subject  have  recently  been  publ 
by  Xicholas  Damalas,  who  during  tl  e 
present  year  has  been  appointed  Pn 
of  Theology  at  the  University  ofAl 
The  one  is  entitled.   ■•  Ou  the    Rei 
of  the  English  Church  to  the  Ort!. 
(~cpl  lift  axioms  ~'i<:  uyy\uii)s  iiu 
trpbc,  7;,;  London,  1867,) 

the  other  "An  Inaugural  Address," 
( Ei apuTTjptoc  ?.o-,oc,  Athens,  186S.)  Tho 


1869.] 


Foreign  Literary  Intelligence. 


127 


tuthor,  aftor  explaining'  the  points  of 
diflfrreuce  between  his  Church  and  the 
Auirliean,  argues  that  only  the  doctrine 
I  he  I  ireek  Church  is  conformable  to  the 
ii.:-,  Scriptures,  and  that  only  on  the 
I  9«i*H  of  her  doctrine  a  real  and  lasting 
union  of  the  two  Churches  is  possible. 
Pm  author  has  great  confidence  in 
the  possibility  of  a  union  of  the  two 
(":  urclies  which  have  so  many  points  in 
common.  He  thinks  that  it  may  only 
rciuire  some  external  impulse  to  con- 
i  innate  the  union,  and  he  claims  for 
i.;s  Church  the  right  to  convoke  a 
"  j.'tueral "  (Ecumenical  Council  as  a 
genuine  successor  of  the  seven  (Ecu- 
menical Councils  of  the  ancient  Catholic 
e.iA  Apostolical  Church. 


ITALY. 

The  Jesuit  Perrone,  whose  work  on 
the  doctrines  of  the  Roman  Catholic 
Church  is  a  favorite  text-book  of  the 
Ultramontane  school  in  the  Church  of 
Rome,  has  completed  and  will  soon  pub- 
lish a  work  in  three  volumes  "  on  the 
Divinity  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ."  (De 
Divinitate  Domini  Nbstri  Jem  Christi.) 

Of  the  celebrated  work  of  De  Rossi  on 
Subterraneau  Rome,  [Roma  Sotieranea,) 
the  second  volume  has  been  published  in 
Rome.  It  is  chiefly  devoted  to  the 
monuments  of  the  "large  catacomb  of 
St.  Callixrus.  With  the  aid  of  the  mon- 
uments examined  by  him  the  author 
institutes  new  investigations  on  the 
history  of  the  early  Popes. 


Art.  IX.— SYNOPSIS  OF  THE  QUARTERLIES,  AND  OTHERS  OF 
THE  HIGHER  PERIODICALS. 

American  Quarterly  Reviews. 

P^rriST  Quarterly,  October,  1S6S.  (Philadelphia.)— 1.  Philosophy  and  Relig- 
ion. 2.  Translation  and  the  Future  Life.  3.  Comparative  Religion.  4.  The 
Blasphemy  against  the  Holy  Ghost.     5.  The  Office  of  the  Divine  Law. 

BreuoTHECA  Sacra,  October,  1S6S.  (Andover.)— 1.  The  Exesretieal  Punctua- 
tion of  the  New  Testament.  2.  The  Natural  Theology  of  Social  Science.  3.  Mr. 
Grate's  Theory  of  Democracy.  4.  The  Death  of  Christ  in  its  Outward  Appear- 
ance and  its  Historical  Influence.     5.  The  Land  of  Moriah.     G.  Biblical  Notes. 

OOSCUEGATION-AI.  REVIEW,  November.  1S6S.  (Boston.)— 1.  The  Divine  Order  aud 
l'!:>n  concerning  Prayer.  2.  Modern  Infidelity  and  the  Bible.  3.  Recent 
Catholic  Tracts."  4.  The  Arabian  Desert.  5.  Paul's  Troas  Parchments  Found. 
t  The  House  of  God  a  Business  House. 

>'••  av.fxical  Quarterly  Review,  October,  1868.  (Gettysburg.)— 1.  The  Incar- 
nation, the  Christology  and  Soteriology.  2.  Regeneration.  3.  The  Third  Com- 
mandment 4.  Scriptural  Argument  (or  Sudden  Conversions.  5.  Thellomiletieal 
Value  of  Cicero  de  Oratore.  6.  Novels.  7.  Full  Fidelity  to  God's  Gifts.  S.  Re- 
miniscences of  Lutheran  Ministers. 

Fsttmu,  Baptist  Quarterly,  October,  1SG3.  (Dover,  N.  H.)—  1.  Christ's 
Vital  Relations  to  Men.  2.  Roman's  Work  in  India.  3.  The  First  Chapter 
of  Kphesians,  or  Personal  Predestination.  4.  The  Book  of  Job  and  its  Lessons. 
'•>■  Pulpit  Eloquence.  6.  The  Resurrection.  7.  Personal  Christian  Develop- 
:  <>t  8.  Doctrine  and  Polity  of  the  Freewill  Baptists.  9.  Art  in  lu- 
•  '•ruction. 

Hekcebsburoh  Review,  October,  1SG8.  (Philadelphia.)— 1.  The  State  as  an 
:  • -nt  in  Civilization.  2.  An  Inquiry  into  the  Validity  of  Lay-Baptism.  3.  An- 
swer to  Professor  Dorner. 

*»'»'*'  Es-glan-der,  October,  1SG8.     (New  Haven.)— 1.  Pampresbyterianism.    2.  Life 

"»  <ho  Argentine  Republic  in  the  Davs  of  the  Tyrants.     3.  The  Positive  Philos- 

I'y  since  1848.     4.  The  True  Conception  of  the   Christian    Ministry.     5.  Our 

Nuances.     6.    Dr.  N.  W.  Taylor's  Theology:   A    Rejoinder  to   the  "Frincctou 

Bwiew."     7.  Divorce.     8.  The  Women  of  the  Northwest  during  the  War. 


128  Synapsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and         [January, 

North  British  Review,  September,  18G8.  (New  York  :  Reprint.)—  1.  Bartolo- 
meo  de  Las  Casus.  2.  The  Greek  Gnomic  Poets.  3.  On  the  Education  of  the 
Imbecile.  4.  Zwingli,  the  Reformer.  5.  France  in  Europe  and  in  Africa.  6.  The 
Four  Ancient  Books  of  Wales.     7.  Nathaniel  Hawthorne.    8    Positivism. 

Untversalist  Quarterly,  October,  1868.  (Boston.)— 1.  Freidrich  Schleier- 
macher.  2.  Christ's  Work  with  all  Souls.  3.  The  Process  of  God  in  Nature. 
4.  Africa:  Physical,  Historical,  and  Ethnological.  5.  John  Murray.  6.  Vale- 
rius the  Great. 

North  American  Review,  October,  1868.  (Boston.)— 1.  Philosophical  Biology. 
2.  Massimo  DAze^lio.  3.  The  New  York  Convention.  4  The  Principles  "of 
Geology.  5.  Epic  Philosophy.  6.  Tho  Political  Situation  in  England.  1.  Har- 
vard College  Library.     8.  The  Siege  of  Delhi.     9.  The  Spanish  Gypsy. 

The  first  article,  by  Mr.  Francis  Ellingwood  Abbot,  is  a  piece  of 
very  elaborate  writing*  and  very  laborious  reading.  It  is  an  at- 
tempt to  test  the  validity  of  Herbert  Spencer's  accounting  for  the 
origin  of  life  on  his  principle  of  "  evolution."  Mr.  Spencer's  evo- 
lution consists  simply  of  the  regular  process  of  unintelligent  cause 
and  effect,  with  merely  material  elements,  extended  through  end- 
less time  and  boundless  space  ;  and  his  effort  is  to  show  that  this 
process  would  necessarily  evolve  all  the  cosmical  phenomena  we 
know,  including  the  highest  manifestations  of  life  and  thought. 
Apparently,  Mr.  Abbot  condemns  the  attempt  of  Mr.  Spencer 
as  a  failure.  He  holds  that  the  phenomena  of  life  cannot  be  ex- 
plained by  merely  cheniico-mechanical  elements  aud  forces.  Vital 
phenomena,  he  avers,  as  exhibited  in  living  beings,  are  of  a  nature 
so  diverse  from  mere  mechanical  phenomena  that  it  is  perfectly 
unphilosophical  to  deny  a  diversity  of  causations.  There  are 
facts  of  life  in  abundance  for  which  chemical  and  mechanical 
powers  cannot  account. 

But  while  thus  rejecting  Mr.  Spencer's  tracing  all  the  phenom- 
ena of  the  cosmos  to  mechanical  forces,  Mr.  Abbot  still  indorses 
the  explanation  of  the  (/real  whole  by  evolution.  He  rejects,  with 
all  Mr.  Spencer's  vehemence  and  contempt,  all  "  special  creation  ;" 
and  believes  that  the  universe,  with  all  its  phenomena,  comes  forth 
into  successional  existence  by  natural  development.  All  things 
come,  he  affirms  with  Mr.  Spencer,  by  a  series  of  causations  ;  but, 
unlike  Mr.  Spencer,  he  believes  that  the  causations  arc  not  one, 
namely,  mechanical,  but  two,  namely,  mechanical  and  vital.  But 
how  does  Mr.  Abbot  theorize  that  living  beings,  life,  come  into 
existence  without  special  creation?  He  adopts  the  exploded 
theory,  rejected  alike  by  Darwin  and  Spencer  with  apparent  con- 
tempt, of  spontaneous  generation/  And  thus  he  .attains,  what  he 
denies  Herbert  Spencer  to  have  attained,  the  solution  of  the 
entire  existence  of  the  cosmos  in  space  and  time  by  the  one  law 
of  development.     Yet  he  does  not,  like  Mr.  Spencer,  snjmose  that 

w 


ISfiO.]      '        Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  129 

the  universal  and  eternal  process  can  be  grounded  in  an  unintel- 
ligent "  Unknown  Absolute,"  (as  genuine  a  big  word  for  noihing- 
ulali  as  any  pseudo-philosopby  ever  engendered,)  but  in  an  Infi- 
nite Intelligence.     His  remarks  on  this  point  are  forcible  : 

T:.o  more  completely  the  process  of  organic  evolution  can  be  traced  in  detail,  its 
•  iritiea  dispelled,  aud  its  perfect  unity  brought  to  view — the  more  widely  its 
r  :  itions  to  the  general  course  of  inorganic  phenomena  can  be  detected  in  their 
« .'vile  ramification? — the  more  plainly  the  universe  is  shown  to  be  permeated  by 
unvarying,  harmonious,  and  all-inclusive  law — so  much  the  more  does  the  entire 
irsietn  of  Nature  become  admirably  intelligible,  and  so  much  the  greater  becomes 
l  .-  probability  of  its  origination  in  intelligence.  If  we  grant  to  Mr.  Spencer  the 
miration  of  his  thesis,  that  the  "law  of  evolution"  regulates  all  phenomena, 
he  must  grant  in  return  that  this  is  the  best  conceivable  proof  of  Infinite  Intelli- 
gence; for  the  cosmos  becomes  at  once  the  embodiment  of  an  omnipresent  idea. 
IC  a*  science  advance?,  it  continually  discovers  new  adaptations  and  uniformities 
:a  Nature,  then,  although  it  may  not  be  able  to  render  a  reason  for  every  thing,  so 
:  any  things  are  perpetually  coming  to  light  for  which  it  can  render  a  reason,  that 
it  becomes  a  fair  induction  to  conclude  that  every-where  a  reason  exists.  The 
itronger  the  evidence,  therefore,  that  law  is  universal,  and  that  universal  law  is 
Intelligible,  so  much  the  stronger  is  the  presumption  that  intelligence  is  Nature's 
r  '..  When  teleology  is  made  to  mean  the  direct  and  confident  assignment  of 
Ihu  or  that  motive  for  this  or  that  natural  adaptation,  it  may  well  be  ridiculed  as 
ibe  bastard  offspring  of  ignorance  and  conceit;  but  if  it  means  only  the  supposi- 
tion of  omnipresent  reason  as  the  probable  secret  of  omnipresent  order,  ignorance 
■  i  conceit  alone  will  ridicule  it.  The  rational  Theist,  far  from  imposing  on  Nature 
■  own  ways,  is  quite  content  to  study  reverently  the  ways  of  Nature;  and, 
'-.-•tad  of  "figuring  to  himself  the  production  of  the  world  and  its  inhabitants  by 

*  'Great  Artificer,'  "  as  Mr.  Spencer  unintentionally  caricatures  Theism,  neither 
;---!nits  his  imagination  to  deceive  him  with  gross  analogies,  nor  hesitates  to  accept 

•  '•:  docility  whatever  science  shall  prove  as  the  true  character  of  natural  laws. 
cut  lie  is  assuredly  not  so  entangieTt  tn  purely  mechanical  conceptions  as  to  be 
•'    i]  .icitated  for  rising  to  any  higher  idea  of  Infinite  Intelligence  than   that  of  a 

M  Mechanic.  Perceiving  that  mind  is  the  noblest  outcome  of  Nature,  he  sees 
i '  Nature  itself  the  expression  of  that  which  is  not  less,  but  more,  than  mind; 
1  ••  Hlf-utterance  of  that  which  is  not  below  him,  but  eternally  and  infinitely  above ; 
J-  I  in  this  supreme  conviction  he  finds  the  open  secret  of  the  universe. 

On  this  whole  article  we  may  note  : 

I.  Mr.  Abbot  recognizes  Christianity  only  by  supercilious  allu- 
sions to  Christian  theology,  and  sullen  references  to  the  theologi- 
""n  odium.  But  the  phrase  theologicum  odium  can  be  read  both 
**y>;  as  a  theological  hatred  of  irreligion,  and  an  irreligious 
hatred  of  theology.  Our  impression  is,  that  the  latter  is  more 
I r'  m  riptive,  and  far  more  excuseless,  than  the  former. 

'-'•  The  highly  dogmatic  and  peremptory  exclusion  of  "special 
creation"  from  the  possible  consideration  of  science,  ruling  it  out 
"i  rourt  as  incapable  of  all  claim  of  notice,  is  a  vicious  circle  pre- 
•*nbed  by  a  narrow  school  of  pseudo-philosophers.  For  Comte 
4,1,i  lu\s  followers  to  construct  a  scheme  of  sciences  in  accordance 
v  'tn  their  own  dogmas,  which  excludes  from  science  all  truths  they 
ir<"  pleased  to  reject,  and  then  tun.  round  and  denounce  those 
Httha  as  without  the  pale  of  science,  and  consequently  false,  aud 


130  Synojms  of  the  Quarterlies,  and         [January 

unworthy  of  scientific  consideration,  is  simply  making  one  assump- 
tion prove  another;  and  both  assumptions  being  baseless,  fall  by 
their  own  weight. 

Either  these  classifications  are  assumed  to  include  all  truth,  or 
thev  are  not.  If  they  are  so  assumed,  then  these  gentlemen  must 
hare  beforehand  tested  and  settled  all  truth  by  proper  evidence.  But, 
if  so,  they  have  done  a  very  large  work  ;  and  they  would  act  more 
wisely  by  referring  us  to  the  evidence  that  bases  their  classifica- 
tion rather  than  to  the  classification  itself.  For  if  the  evidence 
be  sufficient,  then  we  are  foreclosed  by  that,  but  not  by  the  classi- 
fication. But  if  these  classifications  do  not  include  all  truth,  and 
there  are  outside  truths  which  science,  by  her  own  laws,  must  not 
know,  and  must  not  consider  even  in  modifying  her  own  system, 
then  such  science  is  in  great  danger  of  being  blind  and  false,  and 
is  unworthy  of  entire  reliance.  Science  may  run  into  false  con- 
clusions from  want  of  outside  truths  rightly  to  shape  her  conclu- 
sions. When,  therefore,  men  like  Maudesly  blatantly  proclaim 
"  psychology  is  no  science ;"  or  men  like  J.  P.  Lesley  asseverate 
"theology  is  no  science;"  or  men  like  Mr.  Abbot  enounce  (as  in 
fact  Huxley  did  before  him)  that  "  special  creations  cannot  come 
before  the  notice  of  science,"  we  hold  all  such  blatancies  as  not 
worth  the  breath  expended  in  uttering  or  the  ink  in  writing 
them. 

3.  The  claim  that  absolute  creation  is  a  "pseud-idea,"  an  incon- 
ceivability, is  without  validity.  Viewed  in  its  passive  phase,  as  a 
being  brought  into  existence,  creation  is  not  only  conceivable  by 
the  reason  but  picturable  to  the  phantasy.  The  girl  who,  in  X.  P. 
Willis's  beautiful  poemette,  seeing  a  star  suddenly  appear  in  the 
firmament,  exclaimed,  "O,  mother,  God  has  made  a  star!"  beheld 
all  that  needs  to  be  beheld  in  the  passive  process.  So  far  as  the 
active  side  of  the  process  is  considered,  namely,  God  in  the  act 
of  absolute  creation,  that  is  just  as  conceivable  or  inconceivable  as 
God  himself,  or  as  the  "Infinite  Intelligence"  of  Mr.  Abbot's  "en- 
lightened Theism;"  and  far  more  so  than  Spencer's  stupendous 
hobgoblin  of  an  "unknown  Absolute."  We  submit  that  Mr. 
Abbot  makes  no  case. 

4.  We  have  repeatedly  maintained  in  our  Quarterly  that  Mr. 
Darwin's  theory,  whether  sustainable  in  science  or  not,  involves  not 
Atheism.  We"  are  gratified  to  add  that  Mr.  Abbot  quotes  from 
Mr.   Darwin    himself  several   passages   which    had   escaped    our 

*  notice,  in  which  that  writer  very  quietly  affirms  the  doctrine  of  the 
special  creation  of  life  at  start;  thus  evincing,  without  any  definite 
purpose  of  the  kind,  that  he  is  an  unequivocal  Theist.     The  Duke 


I      i.:  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  131 

<Y  Argyll  quotes  a  very  positive  repudiation  of  Atheism  as  "an 
»1.-ur.lity  greater  than  Polytheism,"  from  Prof.  Huxley. 

The  article  on  "Principles  of  Geology"  is  unfortunate  at  this  time 
n  eulogizing  Sir  Charles  Lyell's  "  conservatism  "  in  resisting  the 
belief  of  the  stupendous  "antiquity  of  man,"  until  forced  by  com- 
pulsory demonstration!  No  man  is  more  responsible  for  giving 
authority  and  wide-spread  currency  to  that  conclusion,  without  a 
basis  in  well-ascertained  facts,  than  Sir  Charles  Lyell.  A  sudden 
tad  terrible  break-down  seems  to  have  occurred  to  all  his  proofs, 
*t.<l  his  whole  structure  is  tumbling  about  his  head.  Lyell  has  lost 
his  "  fossil  man,"  and  Darwin  finds  a  chasm  between  man  and  the 
lower  animals  which  he  cannot  bridge.  To  all  appearance  the 
scientific  world  is  compulsorily  returning  to  the  conclusion  an- 
nounced by  Cuvier  some  fifty  years  ago,  that  the  Mosaic  history 
it  strongly  confirmed  by  the  geological  demonstration  that  the 
human  race  is  but  six  or  seven  thousand  years  old. 

AvnucAN  Presbyterian*  and  Theological  Review,  October,  1SG8.  (New 
Y-»rk.)  ].  Linguistic  Science  aud  Biblical  Chronology.  2.  The  Primitive  Eld- 
ership.  3.  Humanity  Progressing  to  Perfection.  4.  Examination  of  the  Tenth 
Article.  5.  Aspects"  of  Positivism  in  Relation  to  Christianity.  6.  Early  Pres- 
tyterianism  of  the  East  Side  of  the  Hudson. 

Use  first  article  is  a  valuable  showing  of  the  entire  consistency 
of  linguistic  science  with  the  Mosaic  history.  Professor  Day  col- 
lects from  Max  Mailer  a  number  of  facts  indicating  the  very  rapid 
changes  languages  without  a  written  literature  may  undergo,  and 
thence  shows  that  the  Biblical  chronology  provides  ample  time  for 
'he  complete  development  Of  the  languages  of  antiquity.  Hence 
ill  the  current  theories  which  require  ages  for  linguistic  develop- 
Cs«.nt  are  baseless.     We  give  some  of  the  facts  : 

Auong  the  illiterate  tribes  of  Siberia,  Africa,  and  Siam,  according  to  Prof.  Mul- 
■».  it  has  been  found  that  "  two  or  three  generations  are  sufficient  to  change  tho 
*l  ■-•  aspect  of  their  dialects."  In  Central  America,  a  vocabulary  prepared  with 
('■■'■  cart  by  some  Christian  missionaries  became  useless  ten  years  alter,  so 
'■ ;  i  Waa  the  change.  In  like  manuer  we  tind  districts  of  limited  extent,  and  pop- 
'-  -'•  d  by  the  descendants  of  the  same  ancestry,  covered  over  by  a  great  multt- 
I  -  ')' <>f  local  dialects.  In  Colchis,  that  "  mountain  of  languages,"  Pliny  Bays 
j  '  were  more  than  three  hundred  tribes  speaking  different  dialects.  Even  a 
•/'  Ijr  cultivated,  an  inflected  language,  the  Friesian.  possessing  literary  documents 
at  age,  "is  broken  up  into  endless  local  dialects,"  each  of  which  J'isunintel- 

*  I  i  le  except  to  the  peasants  of  each  narrow  district  in  which  it  prevails." 

A  work  of  Mr.  H.  W.  Bates,  entitled  The  Naturalist  on  the  Amazon,  as  quoted  by 

J'm'. -s0r  Jiiiller,  gavs:   "When   Indians,  men  or  women,  are  conversing  among 

Ivea,  they  seem  to  take  pleasure  in  inventing  new  modes  of  pronunciation, 

:/  •"  distorting  words.     It  is  amusing  to  notice  how  tho  whole  party  will  laugh 

*  •  •  the  wit  of  the  circle  perpetrates  a  new  slang  term ;  and  these  new  words 
k'-  ri  ry  often  retained.     When  such  alterations  occur  among  a  family  or  horde, 

*  ■•  ii  often  live  many  years  without  communication  with  tho  rest  of  their  tribe, 
-•=  I'Xul  corruption  of  language  becomes  perpetuated." 


132  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and         [January, 

Biblical  Repertory  and  Princeton  Review,  October,  1868.  (Philadelphia.)— 
1.  Studies  in  the  Gospels :  Matthew  the  Gospel  for  the  Jew.  2.  Progress  of 
Doctrine  in  the  New  Testament.  3.  Christian  Work  in  Egypt.  4.  Antiquity  of 
Man.     5.  Dr.  Gillett  and  Liberal  Presbyterianism. 

Article  fourth  is  a  comprehensive  and  valuable  discussion  of 
the  arguments  for  the  great  antiquity  of  man,  drawn  from  Lan- 
guage, Ethnology,  Geology,  Archaeology,  Sociology,  and  Egypt- 
ology. 


English  Reviews. 

British  and  Foreign  Evangelical  Review,  October,  1868.  (London.) — 1.  The 
Swedish  Reformation.  2.  Analytical  Commentary  on  the  Romans.  3.  The 
Norwegian  Church.  4.  Philo  Judams.  5.  Assyria  and  her  Monuments. 
6.  The  Christian  Doctrine  of  Sin.  7.  Science  and  Civilization.  8.  Irony  iu 
History;  or,  was  Gibbon  an  Intidel?     9.  Unpublished  Letters  of  Melanchthon. 

British  Quarterly  Revirw,  October,  186S.  (London.) — 1.  Neander.  2.  British 
India  under  Three  Administrations.  3.  Chrysostora.  4.  Parish  Law.  5.  Edu- 
cation in  the  United  States.  6.  Bunsen's  Memoirs.  7.  George  Eliot's  Spanish 
Gipsy. 

Christian  Remembrancer,  October,  1868.  (London.) — 1.  The  Talmud  in  its 
Origin  and  Results.  2.  Greg's  Creed  of  Christendom.  3.  Mediaeval  Religious 
Satire.  4.  The  Early  Bishops  of  Iceland.  S.Richardson.  6.  Essays  on  Church 
Policy.  7.  Dr.  Pusey  and  the  Wesleyan  Methodists.  8.  Lives  of  the  Engli=': 
Cardinals.     9.  The  Church's  Counselors. 

Edixllrgh  Review,  October,  1868.  (New  York:  Reprint.)  — 1.  Sybel's 
History  of  the  French  Revolution.  2.  Senior  on  Ireland.  3.  Hindoo  Fair? 
Legends.  4.  Kinglake's  Invasion  of  the  Crimea.  5.  Darwin  on  Variation 
of  Animals  and  Plants.  6.  The  Papacy  and  the  French  Empire.  7.  The 
Agricultural  Laborers  of  England.  8.  The  Spanish  Gipsey.  9.  The  Expiring 
Parliament. 

■Westminster  Review,  October,  1S68.  (New  York:  Reprint.) — 1.  Landed 
Tenure  in  the  Highlands.  2.  Poems  by  William  Morris.  3.  Reform  of  our 
Civil  Procedure.  4.  Spielhagen's  Novels.  5.  The  Property  of  Married  Women. 
6.  China.     7.  The  Suppressed  Sex.     8.  Sea-sickness.     9.  Middle  Clas3  Schools. 

London  Quarterly  Review,  October,  1S68.  (New  York:  Reprint.) — 1.  The 
Great  Railway  Monopoly.  2.  Lady  Minto's  Memoirs  of  the  Right  Hou. 
Hugh  Elliot.  3.  Deer  and  Deer  Parks.  4.  The  Archbishops  of  Canterbury 
of  the  Reformation.  5.  Lake  Dwellings.  6.  Tho  Homeric  Question.  7.  Mr. 
Matthew  Arnold's  Report  on  French  Education.  8.  Yorkshire.  9.  The  Public 
Questions  at  Issue. 

The  article  on  Lake  Dwellings,  •written  by  an  authoritative 
examiner  of  those  phenomena,  negatives  their  stupendous  antiquity 
in  his  closing  paragraph  in  the  following  very  decisive  style: 

If  we  look  at  the  lake  remains  themselves,  and  guess  how  long  it  mu*t  hare 
taken  for  such  large  and  numerous  settlements  to  have  grown  up  in  t 
Age,  before  the  new  series  of  towns  belonging  to  the  ages  of  bronze  and  iron,  il 
teems  necessary  to  date  their  first  foundation  in  Switzerland  several  centuries 
before  the  Christian  era.  But  this  general  impression  of  length  of  time  do«.-s  no« 
readily  shape  itself  into  a  distinct  chronology.  It  wo  are  to  make  a  stand  ai.y- 
where,  we  will  make  it  in  a  protest  against  such  point-blank  assertions 
the  Swiss  lake  villages  belong  to  "  ages  ascending  far  beyond  the  Pharaohs.''     ^  8 


1*  •*!».]  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  133 

•smhm  few  chronolog-e^  would  give  to  the  pyramids  of  Egypt  an  antiquity 
-  t!mn  two  thousand  years  B.  C.  The  Swiss  lake  dwellings,  for  all  we  can 
j  -.r.  to  t!ie  contrary,  may  be  as  old  as  this,  or  even  older  ;  but  mere  possibilities 
i-.  :'  r  little  in  such  matters,  and  as  yet  we  have  met  with  nothing  like  an  absolute 
toeing  proof  that  the  first  lake-man  drove  his  first  ruddy -pointed  fir  stem  in  tlit 
...;.<•  '.raters  fifteen  hundred,  or  even  a  thousand  years,  before  the  Christian  era. 

So  Hills  one  of  Sir  Charles  Lyell's  props  to  the  theory  of  the 
geologic  man. 


German  Reviews. 

.-'tvmen*  0KB  Krittken.  (Essays  and  Reviews.)  1869.  First  Number. 
Eitayt:  1.  Weiss,  Apocalyptic  Studies.  2.  "Weiss,  Outlines  of  Christ's  Doc- 
trine of  Salvation  in  the  Synoptical  Gospels.  3.  Baxman.v,  Hermann  von 
Bcicbenfln,  as  a  Historian  and  Writer  on  Ethics.  Thoughts  and  Remarks: 
1.  Tholuck,  The  Doctrine  of  the  Lord's  Supper  in  the  Modern  Lutheran  The- 
ology. 2.  Krchmel,  Johannes  Drandorf.  Reviews:  1.  Zahn,  Alarcellus  of 
Aucrra,  reviewed  by  Moller.  2.  Kritzler,  Civilization  and  Christianity 
r<  riewed  by  Kichter.  3.  Kxaake,  Johannis  Staupitii,  Opera  Omnia,  reviewed 
ly  Bixuseil. 

The  object  of  the   first   article   is   to   examine  again   what   the 

talhor,  in  common  with  the  recent  German  theology  in  general, 

-!s  the  "Apocalyptic  ideas  "  of  the  New  Testament.     The  term 

M  explained  as  designating  the  doctrines  of  the  New  Testament 

concerning  the  second  advent,  the  close  of  the  "  present  world- 

■.''  and  the  beginning  of  "the  next  seon."     According  to  the 

»eory  of  inspiration  which   the  author   (and    the    Studie?i  und 

Kritiken  generally)  holds,  the  assumption  of  a  divine  inspiration 

*  f  ilio  Bible  does  not  exclude  the  co-operation  of  a  human  agency. 
ta  accordance  with  this  view,  the  apocalyptic  ideas  of  the  New 
testament  writers  are  explaiued  as  divine  visions  which  bring 
before  the  minds  of  the  writers  the  great  pictures  of  the  future 
' :  U»e  kingdom  of  God,  but  in  the  description  of  these  pictures 
■■•nan  combination  and  meditations  must  be  taken  into  account, 
''♦us  the  author  regards  it  as  settled,  that  the  Apostles  really 
*«eved  that  the  seGond  advent  of  Christ,  which  they  had  beheld 
•  *  'mous,  would  occur  soon,  even   during  their  lifettime.     From 

*  point  of  view  Professor  Weiss  treats,  1.  Of  the  Nero  Legend  ; 

>  "»«  expectation  in  the  first  century  of  a  return  of  Nero  to  life. 

■   0»e  Apocalyptic  Ideas  of  St.  Paul.     3.  The  Time  of  the  Book 

'  Kevelation.      4.    "The    Deadly    Wound    that    was    Healed." 

' !:"  v.  xiii,  3.)     5.  The  Eighth  Emperor.     G.  The  last  Conflict  and 

*  tctory. 

Johannes  Drandorf,  who  is  the  subject  of  a  brief  notice  by 
•Jjjmmel,  was  an  adherent  of  the  doctrines  of  Huss,  and  was 
1  ^nrrn  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 9 


134  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and         [January, 

burned  as  a  heretic  at  "Worms.  Little  has  thus  far  been  known 
of  him.  The  author  of  this  brief  notice  publishes  some  new  aud 
interesting  documents  concerning  him. 

The  three  works  which  are  extensively  reviewed  in  the  last  de- 
partment of  the  Review  have  already  beeu '  mentioned  in  former 
numbers  of  the  Methodist  Quarterly  Review. 

Zeitsciirift  fur  die  Histokische  Theologie.  (Journal  for  Historical  The- 
ology.) First  Number,  1SG9.  —  1.  Prof.  Preger.  (Professor  in  Munich.) 
Preparatory  Essays  for  a  History  of  German  Mysticism  in  the  Thirteenth  and 
Fourteenth  Centuries. 

Professor  Preger,  in  Munich,  has  for  many  years  been  engaged  in 
the  preparation  of  a  history  of  German  Mysticism  of  the  thirteenth 
and  fourteenth  centuries.  The  entire  present  number  of  the 
Journal  for  Historical  Theology  is  taken  up  with  a*  number  of 
essays  treating  of  a  few  prominent  incidents  in  this  history,  but 
more  fully  than  will  be  the  case  in  the  history  itself.  The  mystic 
writers  and  theologians  of  the  Middle  Ages  represent  by  far  the 
soundest  element  in  the  theology  of  the  Church  of  Rome,  for, 
while  they  did  not  externally  separate  from  the  Church,  their 
aspirations  and  speculations  were  built  much  more  on  a  general 
religious  and  Christian  basis  than  on  that  of  scholastic  dog- 
maticism.  Thus  there  is  much  in  their  works  which  Protestants 
can  accept  as  sound  Christian  theology  and  philosophy,  and  not  a 
fcwr  of  the  prominent  men  of  the  school  were  denounced  in  their 
own  Church  as  heretics,  and  are  claimed  as  forerunners  of  the 
Reformation  of  the  sixteenth  century  by  Protestants. 

The  essays  contained  in  this  number  of  the  Review  are  seven, 
namely:  1.  The  Monastic  Regulations  of  the  Dominicans  in  the 
Thirteenth  and  Fourteenth  Centuries.  2.  The  Dominican  Pro- 
fessors of  Theology  {magistri  theologiai)  at  Paris  in  the  Thir- 
teenth Century.  3.  The  Provincial  Friars  of  the  Dominican 
Order  in  the  Monastic  Province  "Germany"  in  the  Thirteenth  and 
Fourteenth  Centuries.  4.  Theodoric  of  Freiburg.  5.  Master 
Eckhard.  G.  Henry  of  Nordlingen.  7.  John  Tauler.  8.  Henry 
Suso.  9.  The  " Goltesfreund"  ("Friend  of  God")  in  the  Obcr- 
land. 

Some  of  these  subjects,  especially  the  lives  and  writings  of 
Tauler  and  Suso,  have  been  often  treated  of  before,  but  the  author 
furnishes  some  new  material.  Altogether  the  essays  raise  a  high 
opinion  of  the  larger  work  on  Mysticism,  of  which  they  are  the 
harbinger. 


jkOD.]  .Quarterly  Book -Table.  135 

Akt.  X.— QUARTERLY  BOOK-TABLE. 

Religion,  Theology,  and  Biblical  Literature. 

P*  Revelation  of  Law  in  Scripture;  considered  with  respect  both  to  its  own  Nature 
rind  to  its  Relative  Place  in  successive  Dispensations.  The  Third  Series  of  the 
Cunningham  Lectures.  By  Patrick  Fairbairx,  D.D.  8vo.,  pp.  4S4.  Neu- 
York:  Robert  Carter  &  Brothers.     1S69. 

la  the  present  volume,  as  iu  his  works  ou  Typology  and  on  Proph- 
ecy, Dr.  Fairbairn  furnishes  a  rich  body  of  exposition  both  of  the 
OKI  Testament  Scriptures  and  of  their  relation  to  the  New.  The 
present  volume  is,  perhaps,  scarcely  equal  to  the  other  two,  but  is 
itill  obviously  pervaded  by  the  same  penetrative  mind.  Dr.  Fair- 
burn  is  amply  familiar  with  the  most  modern  researches  in  the 
field  he  cultivates;  he  possesses,  himself,  the  most  modern  spirit 
aud  style  of  thought;  yet  he  maintains  the  firmest,  clearest  hold 
upon  the  old  evangelical  theology,  knowing  full  well  how  to  be 
progressive  without  being  destructive.  His  Calvinism  appears  to 
[•ossess  a  hue  hardly  blue  enough  for  the  optics  of  the  magnates 
of  the  old  Kirk;  it  is  scarce  perceptible,  and  never  repulsive  to 
the  most  clear-eyed  and  sensitive  Arminian.  We  are  able  to  rec- 
ommend the  work  to  our  readers  with  scarce  a  single  abatement. 

In  the  Old  Testameut  Dr.  Fairbairn  recognizes  the  Decalogue  to 
l>c  centrally  The  Law  ;  to  which  the  ceremonial  system  is  a  sub- 
HTvient  accompaniment,  designed  to  impress  it  deeply  in  the  soul 
of  the  Representative  Race,  the  Jews.  Of  this  Law  the  Psalms 
and  the  Prophets  are  not  the  progressive  advancement  and  im- 
provement, but  the  means  of  breathing  the  true  spirit  of  the  old 
announcement  into  the  popular  heart.  Coming  into  the  New 
i<  lament,  we  find  in  the  living  Christ  a  living  realization  of  the 
perfection  of  the  Law,  and  iu  his  death,  Dr.  Fairbairn  finds,  with- 
out shrinking  from  the  announcement,  a  satisfaction  of  divine 
justice  f°r  the  sins  of  men.  He  expounds  with  much  fullness  and 
great  clearness  the  relations  of  the  Law  to  the  Gospel,  and  from 
ih.jse  relations  he  shows  how  the  modern  revival  of  Ritualism  is 
°l'posed  to  the  true  Gospel.  The  volume  is  closed  with  an  appen- 
dix containing  exegeses  of  a  number  of  important  texts,  as  deduced 
'r,)m  the  views  in  the  body  of  the  work.  These  expositions  are 
•resh  and  fundamental,  exhibiting  the  usual  traits  of  the  author's 
Hear  intellect  and  sound  methods  of  theological  discussion. 

♦\  c  cannot,  however,  indorse  Dr.  Fairbairn's  indorsement  of  the 
•"'lowing  language  of  A.  A.  Hodge,  touching  the  transferability 
"•  guilt:  "The  sinful  act  and  the  sinful  nature  are  inalienable. 
*''«  guilty  or  just  liability  to  punishment,  is  alienable,  otherwise 


136  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

no  sinner  can  be  saved."  We  hold  it  axiomatically  certain  that 
the  guilt,  or  strict  punishment  of  an  act,  is  no  more  "  alienable," 
that  is,  transferable,  from  the  actor  to  another  being,  than  the  act 
itself,  or  the  very  personality  of  the  actor.  To  say  that  a  person  is 
guilty  of  or  for  a  -wicked  act  is  but  another  form  of  saying  that  he 
wickedly  performed  the  act;'  and  as  the  guilt  is  intransferable  from 
the  wicked  act,  and  the  act  is  intransferable  from  the  personality 
of  the  actor,  so  the  guilt  is  intransferable  from  him. 

Suppose  Pythias  to  have  been  a  genuine  criminal,  and  Damon  to 
have  died  in  his  stead.  Then  supposiug  that  this  rare  fact  had 
been  wrought  into  a  system  of  thought,  of  oratory,  and  emotional 
literature,  what  would  have  been  the  natural  phraseology  in  which 
the  grand  transaction  would  have  been  depicted  ?  It  would  have 
been  said  that  Damon  suffered  JPythias's  p>unishynent,  took  his  crime 
2q)on  himself,  hecame  the  criminal  in  his  place,  bore  his  crime 
in  his  own  body,  assumed  his  guilt,  became  crime  that  he  might 
become  innocence.  Yet  literally  and  strictly  Damon  did  not  one  of 
these  things.  He  was  innocent,  guiltless,  without  crime  and  with- 
out punishment  from  beginning  to  end.  He  endured  not  punish- 
ment, but  only  suffering  in  lieu  of  another  man's  punishment.  The 
simple  fact  would  be  that  an  innocent  man  endured  an  infliction  of 
the  objective  forms  of  penalty  that  a  guilty  man  might  escape  its 
reality.  And,  stripped  of  conceptual  language,  nothing  more  was 
done  or  demanded  in  the  case  of  Jesus  and  the  sinner.  Trans- 
ferred guilt  is  just  as  palpable  an  absurdity  in  ethics  as  a  circular 
triangle  is  in  mathematics. 

In  Pythias's  case  absolute  punitive  justice  was  not  executed,  for 
a  guilty  man  escaped.  What  was  done?  A  governmental  or 
judicial  expedient  was  substituted  in  the  place  of  absolute  vindic- 
tive justice.  By  the  death  of  Damon  a  visible- proclamation  was 
made  to  the  eyes  of  men  that  the  crime  was  heinous,  and  never 
safe  to  be  repeated.  And  were  Damon  like  Earl  Strafford  or 
Charles  First,  the  greatest  man  of  the  realm  or  of  its  whole  his- 
tory, the  proclamation  would  have  exerted  perhaps  even  a  more 
impressive  effect  than  absolute  justice  itself.  It  would  declare  that 
though  the  guilty  is  released,  yet  guilt  is  none  the  less  guilty,  sin 
none  the  less  sinful. 


Manual  of  Methodism;  or,  tho  Doctrines,  General  Rules,  and  Usages  of  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church.  With  Scripture  Proofs  and  Explanations.  Br 
Bostwick  Hawi.ey,  D.D.     New  York:  Carlton  <fc  Lanahan.     18G8. 

Dr.  Hawley's  little  Manual  is  calculated  to  fill  a  blank  place  in  the 
literature  of  the  Church.      Strange   that   we   have  never  had  a 


jg09.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  137 

primer  fit  to  be  placed  in  the  hands  of  our  catechumens  on 
probation,  which  with  a  few  days'  attention  will  enable  them  in- 
telligently to  answer  the  question  whether  they  approve  the 
doctrines  and  institutions  of  .our  Church!  Very  properly,  the 
Manual  begins  with  a  succinct  explanation,  exhibition,  and  proofs 
of  our  Articles  of  Faith.  To  outside  readers  that  would  seem  to 
W  sufficient  for  the  full  understanding  of  our  denominational 
doctrines.  But  Dr.  Hawley,  of  course,  very  properly  passes  from 
this  our  inheritance  from  the  English  Church,  first  to  an  analysis, 
historical  and  biblical,  of  our  General  Rules.'  Then  come  our 
Prominent  Doctrines,  which,  though  embraced  in  no  Articles, 
really  constitute  our  doctrinal  peculiarities  among  the  modern 
orthodox  Protestant  Churches.  Then  follows  a  chapter  upon  the 
Sacraments,  in  which  the  baptismal  question  is  rather  extensively 
treated.  Last  come  our  Peculiar  Usages,  namely,  Class  Meet- 
ings, Love  Feasts,  Itinerancy,  and  Episcopacy. 

The  work,  though  small,  is  essentially  complete,  and  the  sym- 
metry tolerably  well  preserved.  Ministers  would  do  well  to  take 
note  of  this  work  and  circulate  it  among  our  membership,  and 
especially  our  catechumens.  The  result  will  be  a  better  under- 
handing  of  our  system  and  a  truer  self-consciousness  of  the 
Church.  , 

the  Divinity  of  our  Lord  and  Saviour  Jesus  Christ.  Eight  Lectures  preached  be- 
fore the  University  of  Oxford  in  the  year  1S60,  on  the  foundation  of  the  late 
Hev.  John  Bampton,  M.A.,  Prebendary  of  Salisbury.  By  Henry  Parry 
Uddoh.  Second  Edition,  P2mo.,  pp.  535.  Rivicgtous,  London  and  Cambnugc. 
Sold  by  Carlton  &  Lanahan.  1S6S. 
One  of  the  ablest  volumes  in  theology  published  in  our  day.  It 
takes  the  central  subject  of  Christianity,  the  Person  of  Jesus  the 
Me**iah,  and  demonstrates  his  true  divine  sonship  as  entitled  to 
o«r  worship,  with  a  conclusive  force  against  the  schemes  equally 
of  Deism  and  Socinianism.  It  maintains  with  eminent  impressive- 
»ett  both  that  the  Scriptures  delineate  Christ  as  divine,  and  that 
Ae  Scriptures  which  so  delineate  him  are  themselves  divine.  It 
meets  the  question  in  all  the  aspects  of  modern  thought.  In  so 
'l^ing  it  touches  a  vast  variety  of  subsidiary  topics,  which  interest 
'•''inkers  in  this  field  of  thought,  in  the  present  crisis  of  opinions, 
with  a  master  hand.  It  meets  the  assaults  of  llenan  and  Schenkel 
'•<'t  so  much  by  negatively  invalidating  their  positions,  as  by 
building  up  a  positive  and  impregnable  fortress  in  opposition  and 
' delusion.  It  is  a  structure  of  positive  theology,  in  comparison 
*Uu  whiel,  the  opposing  systems,  to  a  true  heart,  are  seen  to  bo 
freble  and  false.     The  study  of  such  a  work,  written  in  a  style 


13S  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

of  high-toned  biblical  and  catholic  faith,  is  bracing  to  the  spirit. 
The  flimsy  speculations  of  the  current  Rationalism,  that  hardly 
knows  what  it  believes  or  disbelieves,  which  is  enervating  the 
religious  and  moral  tone  of  a  large  class  of  thinkers,  cannot  stand 
•in  comparison  with  the  firm,  bold,  compact  Christianity  expounded 
in  volumes  like  this  of  Mr.  Liddon's.  For  those  ministers  among 
us,  if  any  there  be,  whose  faith  in  the  long-established  doctrines 
of  the  Holy  Catholic  Church  is  thin  and  dim,  we  recommend  a 
few  days'  inhalation  of  the  healthy  and  invigorating  atmosphere 
of  these  pages.  And  as  for  laymen  who  study  such  topics,  and 
whose  loyalty  to  the  Son  of  God  is  shaken  by  the  perusal  of  the 
rationalistic  literature  of  the  day,  this  is  one  of  the  choice  works 
we  should  be  glad  to  put  into  their  hands. 

Mr.  Liddon's  style  is  remarkable  for  condensation  of  argument, 
terseness  of  expression,  perpetual  unfaultering  life  in  every  seutence 
from  end  to  end  of  the  volume,  rare  poetic  liveliness  of  imagina- 
tion, and  rich  rhetorical  music.  In  compact,  glowing,  scholarly 
eloquence,  it  is  a  model. 

There  are  a  few  subordinate  points  in  which  Mr.  Liddon  appears 
to  us  so  extra-orthodox  ns  to  be  heterodox.  He  is,  incidentally, 
sacramentarian  and  High-Church.  He  asserts  the  doctrine  of  the 
"impersonality"  of  the  human  Jesus.  The  will  of  the  Lord's 
humanity  is  by  him  organically  fixed  in  all  its  volitions  by  the 
divine  will.  Our  view  is,  that  Jesus  was  a  perfect  human  person, 
whose  free  human  will  concurred  in  most  perfect  obedience  to  the 
will  of  the  Divinity.  "  Scripture,"  says  Gregory  of  Nyssa,  "  ascribes 
to  Jesus  all  the  attributes  of  our  nature,  save  only  the  bias  that 
leads  us  to  sin."  Without  such  bias,  as  was  the  original  Adam, 
Jesus,  though  able  to  vary,  did  yet,  without  variance,  maintain 
most  freely  an  absolute  coincidence  with  the  divine  law. 


A  Garden  of  Spkes.  Extracts  from  the  Religious  Letters  of  Rev.  Samuel  Ruther- 
ford. By  Rev.  Lewis  R.  Dux.v.  With  an  Historical  and  Biographical  Essav  by 
Rev.  A.  C.  George,  and  an  Introduction  by  Rev.  T.  L.  Cityler,  D.D.  12tr.o.. 
tinted  paper,  green  and  pilt,  pp.  288.  Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  A  Walden, 
Now  York:  Carlton  <fc  Lanahan.     1SG9. 

Rutherford  was  a  saint  whom  the  heart  of  the  universal  Church 
would  canonize.  His  religious  and  devotional  writings,  as  dis- 
tinguished from  his  controversial,  are  to  be  classed  with  those 
of  Kempis,  Jeremy  Taylor,  and  Fletcher.  He  dwells  in  the  very 
empyrean  of  Christian  experience,  and  his  vivid  fancy  and 
exquisite  language  insinuate  his  pure  and  holy  thought^into 
the  heart  of  the  reader  whose  blessed  lot  it  is  to  possess  a  spirit 


ibuj, 


]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  139 


capable  of  sympathizing  with  his  spirit.  In  an  age  of  sensualism, 
like  the  present,  it  is  a  sign  of  hope,  a  proof  that  there  is  a  goodly 
remnant  according  to  the  election  of  grace,  if  such  -works  find 
compilers,  publishers,  and  readers. 

By  a  curious  coincidence,  Mr.  Dunn  in  the  East  and  Dr.  George 
in  the  West,  unkuown  to  each  other,  were  eugaged  iu  making 
selections  from  Rutherford.  Each  offered  his  MS.  respectively 
to  our  Eastern  and  Western  Book  Concerns,  and  both  were 
editorially  sanctioned-  and  about  to  be  published.  When  this 
simultaneity  was  discovered,  it  was  agreed  that  Mr.  Dunn's 
■elections'  should  be  adopted,  and  Dr.  George's  biographical 
sketch  of  the  author  be  retained.  It  is  issued  in  the  beautiful 
ityle  of  our  Western  house,  and  will  be  an  acceptable  boon  to 
the  Church. 

Rutherford  was  born  in  Scotland  in  the  year  1600,  and  became 
.Master  of  Arts  at  the  University  of  Edinburgh  in  1621.  His 
letters  were  written  during  a  period  extending  from  1628  to  1661, 
the  year  of  his  death.  His  letters  entire  have  been  published  by 
the  Carters.  The  biographical  essay  by  Dr.  George  is  in  his  best 
style.  We  commend  the  volume  to  our  readers  as  one  of  the 
most  delightful  aids  to  personal  piety. 


Tki  Romance  of  M.  Renan  and  the  Christ  of  the  Gospels.  Three  Essays  by  Rev. 
l>r.  Schaff  and  M.  Xapolf.o.v  Roussel.  Green  and  gilt,  16mo.,  pp.  239. 
New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan.  Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  &,  AValdeu.  Tract 
^  <iety  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church.     1SGS. 

In  accordance  with  a  now  established  custom,  this  beautiful  little 
tolume  is  called  a  tract.  Our  belief  is  that  a  tract  is  wisely  made 
to  he  externally  attractive.  The  leaves  that  are  for  the  healing  of 
Ihe  nations  should  not  look  dry  and  shriveled.  Colors  and  forms 
a'i.l  esthetic  symbols  should  recommend  them  to  the  receiver's 
Welcome,  and  make  them  seem  too  fair  to  be  flung  into  the 
gutter. 

1"  the  first  of  these  two  monograms,  Dr.  SchafT  so  draws  the 
Jx-rtrait  of  the  Jesus  of  the  Gospels  as  to  make  apparent  his  true 
divinity.  This  prepares  us  for  the  second  piece,  iu  which  the  fancy 
Je-uis  of  Uenan  is  shown  to  be  an  impossible  being.  The  style 
f,{  both  articles  is  fresh  and  popular,  and  the  combined  argument 
"  let  forth  with  admirable  oiVect  for  the  extensive  class  of  readers 
•'•>  whom  it  is  addressed. 

Hie  argument  drawn  U  >m  the  person  of  our  Lord,  for  higher 
tatters,   was   first   set  fo-th  in    modern   times,  with  unsurpassed 


140  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [Janitor*- 

effect,  by  Ullmann  in  his  "  Sinlessness  of  Jesus,"  published  in  this 
country  by  Gould  &  Lincoln.  Second,  by  the  side  of  this,  as  a 
new  argument,  with  all  its  faults,  we  must  place  Ecce  Homo. 
Read  in  this  light,  as  an  unconscious  refutation  of  Kenan,  bv  the 
presentation  of  a  positive  counter  view,  we  consider  Ecce  Homo 
as  eminently  a  destructive  of  the  destructive.  Finish  this  ele- 
vated course  of  reading  with  Liddon's  Bampton  Lectures,  and  it 
must  generally  be  an  erratic  will,  we  think,  that  prevents  the  mind 
from  taking  a  true  and  firm  position. 


Sermons.  By  Rev.  Henbt  "Ward  Beecher,  Plymouth  Church.  Brooklyn.  Se- 
lected from  Published  and  Unpublished  Discourses,  and  Revised  by  their 
Author.  In  two  volumes,  large  12mo.,  pp.  4S6  and  484.  Xew  York:  Harper 
&  Brothers.     186S. 

Booked  up  for  posterity !  These  stately  volumes  are  monumental, 
bearing  inscriptions  that  are  to  tell  a  coming  age  what  were  the 
verba  ipsissima  with  which  the  Plymouth  preacher  thrilled  and 
quickened  his  generation.  Do  they  bear  the  crystalizing  process? 
"Will  the  coming  reader  feel  the  fixed  and  permanent  lightning  as 
the  present  hearer  and  contemporary  reader  felt  its  first  flash  ? 
We  do  not  know.  We  fail  to  identify  our  own  soul  with  the 
coining  age.  But  somehow  the  once  glowing  words  that  kindled 
and  inflamed  as  they  flew,  look  cold  and  stereotype  in  these  stately 
catacombs.  We  will  not  judge  by  our  own  feelings  ;  for  if  we  did 
we  should  say  that  our  graudsons  will  wonder,  from  this  printed 
page,  what  was  the  power  by  which  Henry  Ward  Beecher  seemed 
to  his  contemporaries  to  almost  rob  Jeremy  Taylor  of  his  title  of 
u  The  Shakspeare  of  Divines." 


A  Defense  of  Jesus  Christ.    By   Menard  Saint   Martin-.     Translated   from  the 
French  by  Paul  Cobdeu.     12mo.,  pp.  182.     Cincinnati :  Hitchcock  k  Walden. 

The  marvelous  transparency  and  glow  of  style  characteristic  of 
the  true  French  preacher  appear  to  fine  advantage  in  the  clear 
type,  upon  tinted  paper,  furnished  by  our  Western  publishers.  We 
could  wish  a  fuller  biography  of  the  eloquent  author,  who  departed 
before  the  fullness  of  his  age  on  earth.  The  sermons  brought 
many  unbelievers  to  a  confession  of  Christ.  The  argument  for  the 
divine  mission  of  Christ  is  of  course  not  new,  but  it  is  clothed 
with  a  beauty  that  may  attract  readers  who  would  pass  unnoticed 
a  more  solid  and  bulky  volume.  It  may  be  well  recommended  to 
the  preacher  as  an  inspirer  and  model,  and  to  the  ordinary  reader 
as  a  qnickeuer.  of  faith. 


».    ,;  •       Quarterly  Book-Table.  141 

,  and  Via  Rei'jn  of  Terror;  or,  the  Church  during  the  French  Revolution. 
-  .1  from  the   French   of  De   Pressense.      By  JOHN  P.    Lackoix,    A.M. 
.     ,,   pp.   41G.     New  York:    Carlton  <fc  Lnnalian.    Cincinnati :   Hitchcock  &, 
i.'n.     1869. 

T>.:*  elegant  volume,  translated  and  modified  from  the  French 
i ;  the  eloquent  Pressense,  comes,  by  permission  of  the  original 
wthor,  through  the  hands  of  the  Western  professor,  with  peculiar 
1 1  »j»riety,  being  himself  a  descendant  of  a  French  Protestant 
Mticstry.  It  is  full  of  monitory  lessons.  How  illiberal  is  Liberalism  ! 
How  irrational  is  Rationalism!  How  credulous  is  Skepticism! 
How  intense  the  theologicum  odium  of  the  haters  of  Christian 
ibeoiogy!  How  fierce  a  persecutor  is  the  infidel  Antichrist! 
Itut  Uie  lessons  of  the  work  will,  we  trust,  be  more  fully  expanded 
b  a  forthcoming  Quarterly  article. 


IV  Garden  of  Sorrows;  or,  the  Ministry  of  Tears.  By  Rev.  Joun  Atkixsox. 
I  too,  pp.  203.  Tinted  paper,  and  gilt.  New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan.  Cin- 
atuutti :  Hitchcock  k  Walden. 

(  I  ristianity  does  not  prevent  sorrows  on  earth,  as  the  sun  does 
'-  A  prevent  clouds ;  but  it  knows  how  to  give  them  luster  and 

ry,  and  render  them  fertilizers  of  the  soil  of  the  soul.  From 
•    man,  of  sorrows  we  learn  how  to  sorrow.     The  lessons  his 

*t  example  furnishes  to  his  Church  and  his  followers  are  beau- 
I  illy  developed  in  the  little  gem  before  us.  Mr.  Atkinson 
writes  in  a  fresh  and  flowing  diction,  and  has  selected  a  topic 
•hich  his  style  of  mind  is  eminently  qualified  to  unfold.  It  is 
:  :.'•  up  by  the  publishers  in  beautiful  style,  and  forms  a  choice 
-    '•  ')v>ok  for  this  or  any  other  season. 


'  !«t  of  Biblical,  Theological,  and  Ecclesiastical  Literature.     Prepared  bv  Rev. 
•«'  M'Cuntock:,  D.D.,  and  James  Strong,  S.T.D.     Vol.  2,  C— D.     8vo.,  pp. 
«*     New  York  :  Harper  &  Brothers.     1863. 

■•f  rvadcrs  will  receive  with  pleasure  the  announcement  that  this 

v ror*  IS,  in  the  hands  of  its  authors,  in  such  a  state  of  forwardness 

i%  'la-  volumes  will  be  issued  as  rapidly  as  the  work  of  publica- 

:i  can  be  accomplished.     The  purchasers  of  these  first  volumes 

■•*>'  therefore  reasonably  hope  that  the  whole  work  may  in  due 

•woe  be  ia  their  hands.     It  will  then  be  in  itself  a  very  complete 

"r"»ry.     The  works  of  Kitto  and  of  Smith,  the  latter  now  in  pub- 

■   'U<m  in  this  country,  are  valuable,  but  not  greatly  needed  by 

.    PO»8eB80r8  of  the  present  work,  being  essentially  embodied, 

*n!'  much  additional  matter,  in  it- 


142  Methodisi  Quarterly  Review:  [January, 

The  Book  of  the  Prophet  Jeremiah  and  that  of  the  Lamentations.  Translated  from 
the  Original  Hebrew.  With  a  Commentary,  Critical,  Philological,  and  Ex- 
egetical.  By  E.  Henderson,  D.D.  12mo.,  pp.  192.  Andover:  Warren  P. 
Draper.  Boston:  W.  H.  Halliday  &  Co.  Philadelphia:  Smith,  English,  &  Co. 
1868. 

A  translation,  by  an  eminent  English  biblical  scholar,  in  poetic 
form,  giving  to  the  English  reader  a  far  clearer  appreciation  botli 
of  the  meaning  and  the  poetic  beauty  of  the  original  than  he  will 
derive  from  an  English  Bible.  The  notes  are  scholarly  and 
illustrative,  drawn  largely  from  such  early  authorities  as  Calvin 
and  Zwingle;  and  such  German  scholars  as  Michaelis,  Eichhorn, 
Rosenmiiller,  De  Wette,  Dathe,  Hitsig,  Ewald,  and  Umbrcit. 


Reconciliation;  or,  How  to  be  Saved.  By  Rev.  William  Taylor,  of  the  California 
Conference.     Small  12mo.,  pp.  208.     London :  S.  W.  Partridge.     1867. 

Infancy  and  Manhood  of  Christian  Life.  By  Rev.  William  Taylor,  of  the 
California  Conference.  Small  12mo.,  pp.  160.  London:  S.  W.  Partridge.  Ne^- 
York :  Carlton  k  Porter.     1867. 

The  glowing  yet  practical  style  of  thought  in  which  our  noble 
evangelist  excels,  is  here  brought  out  in  effective  use.  Recon- 
ciliation to  God  and  growth  of  Christian  life  are  the  great  topics 
of  religious  thought.  Seldom  are  they  presented  with  greater 
clearness  and  force  than  in  these  little  books. 


Foreign  Theological  Publications. 

David,  der  Konig  von-  Israel  [David,  King  of  Israel.']  A  Biblical  Life- Portrait,  with 
constant  reference  to  the  Davidic  Psalm?.  By  Dr.  FRIEDRICH  Wiliielm  ELrcm- 
maciier.     Pp.  i,  428.     Berlin :  Wiegandt  und  Grieben.     1S67. 

Every  thing  from  Krummacher  is  always  sure  of  a  hearty  welcome 
by  a  large  circle  of  readers.  The  character  of  the  present  volume 
is  very  similar  to  Elijah  the  Tishbite,  long  familiar  to  Americans 
by  the  translation  issued  by  the  American  Tract  Society.  David 
is  not  behind  Elijah  or  Elisha  as  an  exhibition  of  that  re- 
markable facility  with  which  Krummacher  is  known  to  clothe  the 
historical  truths  of  Scripture  in  such  attractive  and  edifying  style. 
The  topics  are:  David's  Call;  the  Harp-player;  David  and  Goli- 
ath; David  an  Inmate  of  the  King's  House;  a  New  Storm;  David 
at  Kama;  Sanctified  Friendship;  Errors;  David  in  the  Wilder- 
ness; New  Help  from  God;  Abigail;  the  Last  Meeting  of  Saul 
and  David;  David  among  the  PbJJisUucs;  a  Deaiii  Celebration; 
David,  King  in  Judah  ;  David,  King  over  Israel ;  the  King  in  the 


|$69.]'  *      Quarterly  Book-Tahle.  143 

|  Id;  the  Bringing  of  the  Ark  of  the  Covenant;  a  Gleaning  ;  the 
«;-■.  at  Promise;  Mephibosbeib  ;  David  at  the  Zenith  of  his  Power ; 
iHvid's  Fall;   David's  Penitence;    the  Beginning  of  Misfortune; 

•  »•  Rebellion  ;  Near  Deliverance ;  the  Decision;  New  Necessities ; 
S  imbering  the  People;  the  Imperial  Assembly;  the  Last  Days; 
v.  1  David's  Death  and  Testimony.  It  is  not  necessary  that  lengthy 
extracts  be  made  in  order  to  prove  the  author's  continued  ortho- 
,\  ,xx — for  some  of  the  Germans  are  evangelical  at  the  outset  and 
become  heterodox  in  their  older  and  weaker  years — sinco  the 
rholebook  "gives  no  uncertain  sound  "  that  Krummacher  is  to- 
day what  he  was  when  he  wrote  "Elijah"  and  "Christ  and  his 
IVo|ile.M  He  regards  the  Old  Testament  as  fully  inspired,  he  tells 
?.*,  :md  that  he  is  not  at  liberty  to  make  his  own  selections  and  say 
of  the  rest  that  they  are  not  of  divine  origin.  He  lays  down  the 
n&xim  that  if  a  preacher  will  acquire  a  hermeneutical  knowledge 

•  f  the  Old  Testament  he  must  share  "the  faith  of  Christ  and  his 
Apostles  in  it  as  the  revealed  truth  of  God,  given  directly  by  his 
••  I'irution,  and  free  from  all  mythical  elements.  Further,  he  must 
1  ive  a  clear  view  of  God's  plan,  beginning  in  the  Old  Testament 
toil  terminating  in  the  New,  to  redeem  man  from  the  curse  of  a 

■■  ken  law.   Last  of  all,  he  is  not  compelled  to  leave  his  New  Tes- 
tament position  in  order  to  study  the  truths  of  the  Old,  for  the 
bright  glory  of  the  New  Testament  can  be  seen  all  through  the 
'  rioas  history  of  God's  chosen  people."     Krummacher's  tribute 
lo  ihe  poetic  features  of  the  Old  Testament  is  earnest  and  evangel- 
'.  and  reminds  us  of  the  glow  of  some  of  Herder's  expressions, 
though  far  excelling  them  in  recognition  of  their  inspired  charac- 
""•     "The  poetic  features  of  the  Old  Testament,"  says  the  author 
I  '"David,"  "especially  of  the  Psalms,  the  Song  of  Solomon,  and 
\-  niohs  of  the  Prophecies,  furnish  our  sermons  with  their  noblest 
-!  rnraenL     We  draw  from  its  circle  of  historical  personages  the 
'-  effective  illustrations  of  the  truths    we  preach.     The  holy 
'  ' rv  have  mixed  for  us  the  colors  for  the  picture  of  the  Church  as 
■  ;•  once  foresaw  it  in  its  perfection." 


tfaf*g9€  ft""  das  Evangclium  Johannis.     [The  Testimonies  for  the  Gospel  of 
!      By  Chkistopii  j'oH.vNwrs   Kiggkkbach,  Dr.   Theol.,  Professor.     Svo- 
*V-  J'-'G.     Basel :  C.  Detloff.     18C6. 

A  good  defense  of  the  authenticity  of  the  Gospel  of  John  against 

"*  *keptica  in  general,  and  Volkmar's  Urspnmg  Unsercr  Uvan- 

•'*"«  in  particular.     Bretschncider  (1S20)  made  a  formal  attack 

■■  Ihe  authenticity  of  this  Gospel,  Strauss  endeavored  to  demolish 


144  Methodist  Quarterly  Rcvicu.  [January, 

what  he  supposed  was  left,  and  Baur  (1844)  and  his  school  have 
striven  to  prevent  the  ruins  from  ever  being  put  into  shape  again. 
Vol k mar' s  work  proves,  however,  that  the  Rationalists  are  afraid 
that  the  work  of  destruction  has  not  been  well  done  after  all. 
Professor  Riggenbach,  one  of  the  best  champions  of  the  truth  on 
the  continent,  takes  a  critical  view  of  the  sceue  of  conflict,  and  in 
making  his  report  says:  "jSTot  a  stone  in  the  great  'edifice  has 
been  touched.'  It  is  as  strong  this  hour  as  before  all  the  assail- 
ants came  in  sight  of  it."  Those  who  wish  a  minute,  scholarly, 
and  apologetic  discussion  of  the  Gospel  of  John,  one,  too,  in  which 
the  best  fruits  of  all  the  latest  investigations  in  exegetical  science 
are  used  to  excellent  advantage,  will  find  just  what  they  wish  in 
the  present  volume.  It  is  not  a  commentary,  but  rather  an  intro- 
duction, the  plan  embracing  first  a  "  Survey  of  the  Characteristics 
of  the  Gospel  of  John,"  and  then  an  "  Account  of  the  Witnesses 
for  the  origin  of  his  Gospel."  The  evidence  is  indisputably  posi- 
tive against  Baur's  view  that  this  Gospel  was  written  about  A.  D. 
ICO  by  some  unknown  individual,  who  drew  a  picture  correspond- 
ing to  the  spirit  of  his  time.  Dr.  Riggenbach  establishes  the  fol- 
lowing points :  That  at  the  middle  of  the  second  century  the 
Gospel  of  John  was  recognized  every-where  in  the  Christian 
Church  as  one  of  the  inspired  writings;  that  it  was  regarded  by 
both  Christians  and  their  enemies  as  the  writing  of  an  Apostle ; 
that  it  had  no  sectarian  bearing  whatever ;  and  that  its  inspired 
and  supernatural  character  is  sustained,  not  only  by  the  universal 
faith  of  the  Church,  but  by  the  internal  character  of  the  Gospel 
itself.  | 

Ijlirlnirh  der  Dogmengeachichte.  {Manual  of  History  of  Doctrines.']  By  Dr.  K.  " 
Hagexbach,  Professor  of  Theologie  at  Basel.  Fifth  edition.  Pp.  xx,  7G1?. 
Leipzig:  S.  HirzeL     1867. 

All  of  Hagenbach's  works  are  again  passing  through  his  hand-, 
this  time,  no  doubt,  for  a  final  polish.  The  present  edition  of  the 
Dogmengcschichtc  is  in  many  chapters  worked  over  anew.  The 
later  theology  is  so  abundant  that  the  fifth  period  (from  the  year 
1 7 '20  to  our  day)  has  required  considerable  enlargement.  We  regret 
that  the  author  takes  so  little  cognizance  of  the  theological  move- 
ments in  the  United  States  and  Great  Britain.  He  acknowledges 
the  excellence  of  the  American  edition  of  his  history,  but  excuses 
himself  from  incorporating  here  those  portions  which  have  been 
add<;d  by  the  American  editor  by  saying,  that  each  should  kecj>  his 
own  property,  and  that  he  (Professor  Hagenbach)  would  not 
enrich  himself  with  other  people's   wealth ;   but  this  is  a  small 


i$69,]  Quarterly  Book -Table.  145 

Niter  and  the  book  in  its  present  shape  is  undoubtedly  the  best 
ItWiory   of  Doctrines    ever   published.     Many   objections   which 

•i.t  lie  well  put  against  all  others  cannot  be  presented  against 
•  ..  The  first  edition  appeared  in  1840,  and  the  present  (the 
-.;'.!>)  is,  therefore,  the  maturity  of  a  childhood  and  youtli  of 
ivenly-seven  years.  After  the  introduction  the  work  proper  is 
'..-. ided  into  five  periods,  as  follows:  Period  first — the  Age  of 
tbologetics ;  period  second — the  Age  of  Polemics;  period  third — 
■:-.<■  Age  of  Systematic  Theology;  period  fourth — the  Age  of  Po- 

..>■«>•  Ecclesiastical  Symbolism,  the  Conflict  of  Confessions  of 
\  -.'ih;  period  fifth — the  Age  of  Criticism  or  Speculation,  and  of 
'.  •  Antagonism  between  Faith  and  Knowledge,  Philosophy  and 
I  rivtianity,  Reason  and  Revelation,  and  attempts  to  reconcile 
<•  antagonisms.  One  of  the  excellences  of  the  present  above 
pervious  editions  is  a  large  increase  of  the  literature  relating  to 
I  >  subject.    The  index  at  the  close  is  in  every  respect  a  model. 


Philosophy,  Metaphysics,  and  General  Science. 

tit  Variation  of  Animals  and  Plants  under  Domestication.     By  Charles  Darwin, 

W  A.,  F.R.S.,  etc.     Authorized  Edition,  with  a  Preface,  by  Prof.  Asa  Gray.    With 

[rations.    In  two  volumes,  pp.  494,  56S.      New  York:  Orange  Judd  &  Co. 

W  ben  Mr.  Darwin  several  years  since  published  his  "  Origin  of 
'"ics,"  he  stated  that  he  should  at  a  subsequent  day  present  the 
-  U  on  which  the  conclusions  there  given  were  founded.  The 
' ■"•■lit  volumes  are  prepared  in  fulfillment  of  that  promise.  A 
*" '"«<!  work  will  discuss  the  variability  of  organic  beings  in  a  state 
• «  mture ;  and  a  third  will  apply  the  principle  of  "Natural  Selec- 
'•-  *> M  to  the  facts  thus  evolved. 

rbese  volumes  are  chiefly  devoted  to  facts  relative  to  domes- 

•  Hea  animals  and  plants,  in  procuring  which  Mr.  Darwin  was 
"*  'ly  aided  by  zoologists,  botanists,  geologists,  breeders  of 
1    '■', r'K   horticulturists,    foreigners,  merchants,  and  government 

'  rs,  all  of  Avhom  he  found  courteous  and  prompt  in  their  assist- 

-    On  the  subjects  of  which   they  treat,  this  is  probably  the 

k'^*t  and  best  arranged  collection  of  facts  that  has  ever  been 

'•  '••■and  must  be  of  great  value  to  the  student.     The  first  volume 

'" -voted  to  the  history  of  our  most  important  domestic  animals 

'  I'1  mis ;  and  the  second  to  such  questions  as  inheritance,  rever- 

B  lo  earlier  forms,  hybridism,  the  causes  of  sterility  and  of  vari- 

*>'.  and  the  laws   of  variation.     The  work  may  therefore  be 

•  }'  concluded    to   possess   a   great    attractiveness  for   various 


146  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

classes  of  practical  men,  as  well  as  the  professional  naturalist  or 
physiologist.  The  facts  which  are  so  faithfully  collected  and  so 
candidly  presented  will  stand,  whatever  becomes  of  the  theories 
which  are  attempted  to  be  built  upon  them. 

To  the  philosopher  and  theologian  the  work  possesses  an  interest 
of  another  kind.  The  author  tells  us  that  it  was  his  observation 
of  birds,  reptiles,  and  plants  in  the  Galapagos  arehipelago,  five 
hundred  miles  from  the  South  American  coast,  which  first  led  him 
to  those  investigations  which  resulted  in  the  theory  which  is  now- 
called  by  his  name.  We  must,  of  course,  wait  for  the  publication 
of  the  other  works  before  we  shall  be  fully  in  possession  of  the 
facts  and  reasonings  which  have  influenced  his  own  mind  ;  and, 
indeed,  it  is  only  in  the  final  one  of  the  series  that  we  shall  find  an 
explanation  of  those  "  singular  and  complex  affinities  "  that  group 
together  all  organic  beings  of  the  past  and  present,  and  show 
♦heir  descent  from  a  single  root.  We  can  easily  believe  that  all 
\orses  have  descended  from  one  ancestor,  and  that  the  numerous 
varieties  of  pigeons  might,  if  we  only  had  their  genealogical 
tables,  be  traced  to  the  same  nest ;  and  we  shall  wait  patiently  for 
the  simple  explication  of  "  the  hand  of  a  man,  the  foot  of  a  dog, 
the  wing  of  a  bat,  the  flipper  of  a  seal,  on  the  principle  of  the 
natural  selection  of  successive  slight  variations  in  the  diverging 
descent  from  a  single  progenitor." 

Meanwhile,  it  is  certainly  fair  that  the  successive  steps  of  the 
argument  as  it  is  developed  be  closely  examined.  The  reader 
cannot  fail  to  observe  how  much  of  it  turns  upon  likelihood  and 
probability.  Inferences  and  guesses,  however  correct  they  may 
often  prove,  must  not  be  taken  for  demonstrated  propositions  upon 
which  to  rear  another  course  of  inferences,  the  final  end  of  which 
will  be  claimed  to  be  the  overthrow  of  the  most  firmly  settled 
thing  in  the  world,  the  truth  of  God's  word.  Conceding  the  facts. 
the  significance  given  them  by  Mr.  Darwin  has  in  it  so  much  of 
hypothesis  and  confessed  ignorance  that  his  "  rational  explana- 
tion "  seems  to  us  most  irrational. 


Mental  Science.  A  Compendium  of  Pscholo;ry  and  the  History  of  Pliilo?opbv. 
Designed  as  a  Text-Book  fur  High  Schools  and  Colleges.  By  ALEXAKDEB 
Bain,  M.A.     12rao.,  pp.  99.     New  York:  I>.  Appleton  ACo.     ISO?. 

The  Human  Intellect.  With  an  Introduction  upon  Psychology  and  the  Soul.  By 
Noaii  Porter,  D.D.     Svo.,  pp.  673.     New  York:  Charles  Scribncr  Jt  Co.     l^OS. 

Mr.  Bain  is  the  author  of  several  stately  volumes  on  Psychology, 
written  from  a  quasi-materialistic  stand-point.  With  him  mind  i-' 
animated  matter,  pervaded  by  a  sensitiveness  which  can  be  devcl 


}-<;•,».)  Quarterly  Booh -Table.  14.-7 

oped  into  thought,  and  enlivened  with  impulses  that  can  he  shaped 
!»iu»  volitions.  All  the  mauifestations  of  so-called  mind  are  de- 
.imvd  not  from  above  but  from  below.  From  sensation  originate 
til  <>ur  capacities  for  knowledge.  Intuitions,  thoughts  that  have 
no  material  type  or  origin,  have  no  existence.  ,  Thisis  a  philoso- 
phy which  usually  springs  from  a  sensual  age,  and  reactively  it 
t.  miualizes  the  age  from  which  it  springs.  It  is  congenial  with 
lhat  school  which,  taking  its  stand  in  physical  science  and  ma- 
•..  ri.il  nature,  bastardizes  all  the  holiest  sentiments  of  the  soul  and 
•J.<-  highest  realities  of  the  universe.  It  is  far  from  the  truth  to 
i  ij  that  all  who  hold  the  views  of  mind  presented  in  this  volume 
*rv  Atheists ;  but  it  would  be  very  near  the  truth  to  say  that  all 
Atheists,  Fatalists,  awd  Materialists  would  accept  the  philosophy 
of  this  volume.     That  the  book  is  an  acknowledged  standard  for 

-  school  is  evinced  by  its  being  published  under  the  auspices  of 
lYofcssor  Youmans,  by  the  indorsement  of  it  from  Professor  Masson 
iv M  the  richest  natural  history  of  the  mind  in  the  language,"  and  by 
ike  patent  ability  with  which  the  views  are  exhibited  in  its  pages. 

A  most  timely  and  effective  antidote  to  the  sensualistic  philoso- 
j  hy  presents  itself  in  the  volume  by  Professor  Porter.  The  pub- 
lication of  this  work  is  a  marked  event  in  the  history  of  mental 

•  ■■■  nee,  not  only  in  our  country,  but  in  the  English  language.  It 
■  n«.t  only  standard,  but  in  its  fullness,  symmetry,  and  complete- 
I  *m  it  is  standard  without  a  competitor.  The  size  of  the  work, 
devoted  to  the  intellect  alone,  exclusive  of  the  sensibilities  and 

•  ill,  may  prevent  its  extensive  adoption  in  our  literary  institu- 

te ;  but,  in  spite  of  the  clamors  of  the  physiologists,  we  think  if 
the  classical  course  is  to  be  diminished  the  study  of  our  higher 
r.itiire  is  quite   as  worthy  to   fill  the  blank  as   the  analysis  of 

•  clea  and  intestines.  Let  every  student  who  would  master  the 
Mysteries  of  intellectual  science  master  the  contents  of  this  work. 

'  rofcssor  Porter  writes  in  a  clear,  manly,  solid  style,  not  very 
••like  that  of  John  Stuart  Mill.  There  is  no  high-flown,  transcen- 
dental nebulosity,  after  the  fashion  of  Coleridge  or  Ralph  Waldo 
uacrsoo.     The  subject  of  our  intuitive  faculties  is  treated  with 

•  rigid  scientific  analysis.  Of  course,  as  the  title  indicates,  the 
Mellect  alone  is  discussed,  and  the  volume  is  not  a  complete 

"  n*ntal  philosophy." 

■  i  and  Drinkinq.     By   James    Parton.    Paper   covers,   12mo.,   pp.   151. 
1    »ton:  Ticknyri  Fields.     1868. 

r-  1  arton's  essays  seem  to  be  written  with  a  set  purpose   to 
Va"oo   physical    morality    and  depreciate  spiritual  Christianity. 


14S  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

lie  shows  bow  tobacco  creates  a  distaste  for  refined  female 
society,  and  sneers  at  tbose  who  "'get' religion."  He  declares 
tbat  all  past  effort  in  behalf  of  temperance  is  a  failure,  and  the 
first  hope  for  the  cause  is  the  abandonment  of  the  moral  and  relig- 
ious effort,  and  commencement  anew  under  Parton  and  science. 
The  whole  performance  is  luminous  with  self-conceit. 


History,  Biography,  and  Topography. 

The  Invasion  of  the  Crimea.  Its  Origin,  and  an  Account  of  its  Progress  down  to 
tho  Death  of  Lord  Raglan.  By  Alexander  "William  Kixglake.  Vol.  ii,  pp. 
G32.     New  York  :  Harper  &  Brothers. 

In  this  volume  Mr.  Kinglake  resumes  the  thread  of  his  narrative 
where  it  was  broken  off  by  the  close  of  his  first- volume,  namely,  at 
the  close  of  the  battle  of  the  Alma.  He  gives  a  graphic  picture 
of  the  situation  at  that  moment,  and  shows  most  conclusively  that 
had  the  allies  attacked  Sebastopol  immediately  on  its  north  side 
they  would  have  taken  it  with  little  loss  of  life.  This  golden  op- 
portunity they  missed,  because  the  French  commander,  St.  Ar- 
naud,  being  sick,  was  unwilling  to  unite  in  the  attack.  Then  fol- 
lows a  fine  description  of  the  famous  flank  march  to  the  south  side 
of  the  doomed  city,  a  march  which,  as  our  author  shows,  would 
have  proved  the  destruction  of  the  allies  if  the  Russians  had  not 
been  so  badly  demoralized  by  their  late  defeat.  But  being  too 
badly  whipped  to  be  led  into  battle  immediately,  they  permitted 
the  allies  to  inarch  unmolested  to  the  south.  There  another  op- 
portunity was  lost,  Sebastopol  not  being  so  defended  on  that  side 
as  to  be  prepared  for  effective  resistance  to  a  vigorous  attack  front 
such  an  army.  Again  the  unwillingness  of  the  French,  now  led 
by  Canrobert,  prevented  an  attack,  and  again  the  city  passed  a 
point  of  peril.  A  partial  investment  of  the  place  was  then  made, 
by  which  time  was  given  to  Todleben  to  prepare  and  perfect  those 
famous  earthworks  which  so  long  resisted  the  efforts  of  the  allies. 
As  soon  as  the  siege  batteries  were  ready  the  attack  was  made. 
The  English  engineers  demolished  the  defenses  opposite  their  bat- 
teries, and  the  city  was  open  to  assault.  Again  the  French,  dis- 
couraged by  explosions  of  their  magazines,  declined  to  join  in  an 
assault,  and  another  golden  opportunity  was  thrown  away.  Fol- 
lowing this  failure  came  the  battle  of  Balaclava,  at  which  tin- 
Russians,  taking  the  initiative,  surprised  the  British  forces,  and 
ought  to  have  gained  possession  of  the  post  of  Balaclava ;  but  En- 
glish pluck  prevailed,  and  the  post  was  saved.  During  this  battle 
there  occurred  two  of  the  most  remarkable  cavalrv  charges  in  tin? 


>/i#]  Q  uarterly  Boole  -  Table.  149 

I  )'..ry  of  war,  namely,  the  charge  of  the  British  Heavy  Dragoons 
a  !  the  charge  of  the  Light  Brigade.  These  charges  are  de- 
i  ribed  with  a  minuteness  which  enables  the  reader  to  understand 

•  ..  ir  appalling  details,  and  with  a  graphic  power  which  thrills  him 
ta  the  quick.  We  know  of  no  pen-picture  in  the  literature  of  war 
vi  impressive  as  Mr.  Kinglake's  portraiture  of  the  "  Charge  of  the 
Li'jht  Brigade.'1''  The  stoiy  of  this  celebrated  charge,  and  Mr. 
Kinglake's  masterly  analysis  of  its  causes,  closes  this  interesting 
i  v!  lime. 

Mr.  Kiuglake  evidently  intends  to  deal  honestly  with  the  facts 

I  t!io  Crimean  war.     His  sources  of  information  are  full  and  re- 

I  il.'o,  heiug  derived  from  personal  observation,  and  from  English, 

r.'xueh,  and  Russian  authorities.      His   criticism  is  candid  and 

utterly.  If  he  wrongly  estimates  his  facts  he  appears  to  do  it 
eaconscionsiy.  His  style  is  strong,  clear,  and  charming.  We 
'•■»•.<•  read  his  book  with  profound  interest,  and  have  closed  its 
ptges  with  a  sharp  appetite  for  its  successor. 


nWt  Country  Homes,  and  how  to  Save  Money  to  buy  a  Home;  how  to  build  neat 
lad  cheap  Cottages,  and  how  to  gain  an  Independent  Fortune  before  Old  Age 
■  raes  on.  "With  a  Description  of  the  Wonderful  Agricultural  and  Horticultural 
A  (vantages  of  New  Jersey,  including,  also,  a  Business  Directory.  By  Serexo 
Edwards  Todd,  of  the  "New  York  Times."  author  of  "Todd's  Young  Farmer's 
H  loual,"  and  "Todd's  American  "Wheat  Culturist."  New  York:  Published  by 
'  ••  Author.     1S68.     Sold  by  N.  Tibbals,  Nassau-street. 

v')u  Todd's  book  is  written  for  young  people  "just  beginning  in 

'•■  e  world"  on  small  means,  especially  about  New  York.     Its  first 

I  »rl  {rives  hints  and  models  for  building  cheap  houses  for  small 

•  I'nilies;  its  second  furnishes  a  large  variety  of  entertaiuiug  and 

raltuble  lessons  touching  the  economies  and  virtues  that  pay  best 

B We;  the  third  unfolds  the  excellence  of  South  Jersey  as  a  field 

;  {  the  most  advantageous  agricultural  enterprise.     Science  has 

:'vt:ilcd  and  the  railroads  have  newly  laid  open  this  section  as  a 

''"ii  of  productive  soil,  salubrious  climate,  and  accessible  markets  ; 

J  '! '""t,  a  better  than  the  West,  without  going  west  to  reach  it. 

••'•  "odd  is  apparently  a  gentleman  of  exuberant  spirits  and  excel- 

»t  intentions;   his  work  is  eminently  calculated  to  do  good — 

-ially  to  South  Jersey. 


•  •  ■-■; 


■J  Works  of  tfie  Rev.  John  Howe,  M.A.  With  Memoir  of  his  Life  by  EDMTTSD 
"*my,  D.D.  Completo  in  two  volumes,  8vo.,  pp.  623  and  CIS.  Robort 
Urt«  £  Brothers.     1369. 

*«en  we  say  that  Howe  is  not  one  of  the  authors  that  take  hold 
!  °'>r  individual  soul,  that  he  seems  prolix,  and  preliminary,  and 
Poubtb  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 10 


150  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

preambulatory,  ever  about  to  say  something  without  ever  saying 
any  wonderful  thing,  perhaps  we  utter  our  own  condemnation  and 
not  Ids.  But  we  never  undertook  a  serious  study  of  his  works 
without  tiring  of  the  attempt.  Yet  there  are  men  of  thought  and 
wisdom  who  say  that  he  is  a  giant,  and  who  tell  the  young 
preacher  that  he  had  better  buy  John  Howe  than  a  new  coat,  if  his 
purse  cannot  afford  both.  We  may  say,  then,  that  here  is  an  old 
publication  of  Howe  with  a  new  and  substantial  coat  on.  If  our 
readers  wish  either  to  test  our  critical  feeling,  or  to  make  a  right 
estimate  of  Howe,  or  to  profit  by  his  treasures  of  thought,  the 
Carters  have  put  him,  in  solid  form,  within  their  reach. 


The  Apostle  of  Kerry;  or,  the  Life  of  the  Rev.  Charles  Graham,  who  had  for  many- 
Years  as  his  Associate  on  the  Irish  General  Missions  the  celebrated  Gideon 
Ousc-ley.  Also  four  Appendices,  containing  one  of  Mr.  Graham's  Sermons,  an 
Irish  Hymn,  etc.  By  Rev.  "W.  Graham  Campbell,  General  Missionary. 
12mo.,  pp.  323.     Dublin:  Moffat  &  Co. 

The  three  wonderful  missionaries  of  early  Methodism  in  Ireland 
were  Gideon  Ouseley,  Thomas  Walsh,  and  Charles  Graham. 
They  founded  a  Methodism  there  from  which  American  Method- 
ism has  largely  drawn.  Dr.  Alexander,  of  Princeton,  said,  that 
the  early  history  of  Methodism  reads  like  a  spiritual  romance. 
One  of  its  most  striking  passages  of  most  truthful  romauce  is  its 
Irish  passage,  which  Mr.  Campbell  has  vividly  presented  in  this 
little  work.  Lovers  of  Methodist  history  the  world  over  will 
thank  him  for  the  gift. 

A  true  apostle  was  this  man  of  Kerry,  in  the  regular  line  from 
Paul,  and  whatever  the  catalogues  of  successional  prelacy  may 
pretend,  endowed  with  credentials  better  than  most  Archbishops 
can  show.  » 


General  Literature. 

The  Reign  of  Law.    By  the  Duke  of  Akotll.     Fifth  and  cheaper  edition.     Small 
12mo.,  pp.  462.     Loudon:  Stratum  &  Co.     18G3. 

The  object  of  this  work  is  to  sIioav  that  it  is  in  perfect  consistency 
with  universally  reigning  law  that  miracles  exist,  that  creation  takes 
place,  that  purpose  is  supreme  in  the  arrangements  of  the  world, 
and  that  man  is  free  both  as  a  member  of  the  divine  government 
and  as  a  constituent  of  civil  society.  It  is  written  in  refutation  of 
tho  seviews  of  the  absoluteness  and  invariability  of  natural  law 
by  which  the  supernatural,  the  divine,  and  the  ethical  are  ex- 
cluded from  existence. 


\%0.)  Quarterly  Book -Table.  151 

That  view  of  miracle  is  taken  and  illustrated  which  holds  it  to 
bo  not  a  suspension  or  violation  of  law,  but  an  interposition  of  a 
iupcrior  power  interrupting,  indeed,  what  would  be  the  regular 
course  of  events,  yet  which,  as  being  simply  the  incoming  of  a  new 
intecedent,  would  be  strictly  in  accordance  with  both  the  laws  of 
causation  and  the  laws  of  nature,  taken  in  the  largest  sense  of  the 
term  nature.  In  regard  to  the  creation  of  man  the  Duke  niain- 
i. litis  that  the  Hebrew  record  requires  no  interpretation  which 
<  i  eludes  that  event  from  the  domain  of  law.  Nor  do  the  devel- 
opment theories  of  Darwin  and  others,  unproved  as  they  yet  are 
in  science,  exclude  the  existence  of  an  all-pervading  _p*/r/>ose  which 
demonstrates  an  all-controlling  Mind.  The  prevalence  of  that 
purpose  he  shows  to  be  as  clear  as  many  other  relations  whose 
existence  even  atheistic  scientists  admit.  Contrivance,  dealing 
v,ith  law,  he  shows  to  exist  by  a  variety  of  striking  illustrations; 
.  specially  from  the  beautiful  adaptation  of  the  forms  of  birds  for 
the  various  modes  of  flight  required  by  their  nature,  to  all  which, 
u  an  amateur  ornithologist,  the  Duke  has  given  special  study.  In 
the  realm  of  mind  he  adopts  that  view  of  the  freedom  of  the  will 
which  rejects  "  compulsion,"  but  maintains  that  if  all  the  antece- 
dents to  the  volition  were  fully  known  the  volition  itself  could  be 
predicted.  Contrary  to  his  own  view  of  himself,  we  hold  that  this 
view  makes  him  a  strict  necessitarian,  for  (leaving  the  Divine  Fore- 
knowledge out  of  the  question)  man  can  predict  a  future  event 
-  nly  through  a  causation  or  a  logical  necessity.  There  must  be 
an  invariable  action  of  the  will,  that  is,  a  strictly  invariable  cou- 
b<  '--lion  between  the  antecedent,  or  sum  of  antecedents,  and  the 
consequent  volition,  in  order  to  insure  the  invariable  accuracy 
of  the  prediction  of  human  foreknowledge.  The  absoluteness 
1 1  the  knowledge  in  the  knowing  mind  would  require  an  abso- 
roteness  of  result  in  the  will.  This  would  be  fatalism;  and 
!"  '  we  behove  that  the  spirit  of  the  Duke  is  not  intentionally 
Statistic. 

1  he  work  is  an  admirable  antidote  to  the  prevalent  Pantheism 
"1  IVsitivisin  of  the  present  day.  It  is  written  in  a  clear  and 
B«ent  style.  The  whole  train  of  thought  is  relieved  by  a  trans- 
I  kfent  simplicity  of  expression  and  an  amplitude  of  illustration 
•Inch  a  familiarity  with  science  enables  him  to  throw  around  the 
'  •',j"«,t.     The  work  will  probably  be  reviewed  in  a  full  article  in 

'  ir  Quarterly. 
'n 
Hie  author  of  this  book,  titularly  disguised  as  the  eighth  Duke 

l'i     k'.vle  or  Argyll,  is  by  personal  name  George  Douglas  Camp- 

»  Secretary  for  India  in  Mr.  Gladstone's  administration,  for- 


152  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

merly  Lord  Privy  Seal  under  Lord  Aberdeen,  and  Postmastor 
General  under  Lord  Palmerston. 

We  may  note,  by  the  way,  that  the  Duke  lately  published  iD 
the  Good  Words  a  series  of  articles  written  intentionally  in  the 
interests  of  Christianity,  in  -which  he  firmly  maintains  the  immense 
antiquity  of  the  human  race.  One  of  his  main  proofs  is  the  exist- 
ence of  the  unmistakable  features  of  the  negro  on  the  Egyptian 
monuments  of  highest  antiquity.  Our  readers  may  see  on  page 
seventy-five  of  our  present  Quarterly  what  a  negro  would  say  to 
that  argument. 


Scotia's  Bards.  The  Choice  Productions  of  the  Scottish  Poets.  With  Brief 
Biographical  Sketches.  Green  and  gold.  Large  12mo.,  pp.  558.  New  York: 
Robert  Carter  &  Brothers.     1869. 

Of  course  old  Scotia  can  furnish  you  poetic  gems  of  unsurpassed 
splendor.  Her  roll,  as  here  exhibited,  extends  from  Thomson,  the 
author  of  the  Seasons,  to  Alexander  Smith,  the  man  whose  fault 
was  too  restless  a  brilliancy.  First  we  have  the  simple  old-time 
bards,  as  Allan  Ramsay,  Robert  Blair,  author  of  The  Grave,  Fal- 
coner, of  the  Shipwreck,  Beattie,  of  the  Hermit,  Macpherson  with 
his  Ossian,  Bruce,  and  Logan.  Then  comes  the  miraculous 
peasant-poet,  Robert  Burns,  his  life  an  era  in  British  poetic 
literature.  That  era  is  followed  by  the  full  blaze  of  the  age 
when  Scott  in  Scotland,  Moore  in  Ireland,  and  Byron  in  England, 
with  countless  minor  stars,  formed  the  most  illustrious  age  of 
English  poetry. 

The  editor  announces  on  page  G4  the  solution  of  one  of  the 
curious  problems  of  literature — the  reality  of  a  Celtic  Ossian,  and 
the  genuineness,  at  least  in  great  part,  of  Macpherson's  work  as  a 
translation  of  actual  Celtic  remains. 

The  work  is  done  up  by  the  Carters  in  standard  style,  and  is 
one  of  the  gems  of  the  season  and  for  any  season. 


Passages  from  the  American  Note  Boc>ks.     In  two  volumes.     12ino.,  pp.  228,  222. 
Boston :  Ticknor  &  Fields.     18C8. 

Hawthorne  wrote  few  paragraphs  that  did  not  attest  the  man  of 
inborn  genius.  His  writings  never,  indeed,  attained  a  broadcast 
popularity  in  his  own  country.  In  fact,  save  with  the  few  who 
were  able  to  feel  the  occult  touches  of  a  rare  mind,  his  name  was  but 
dimly  known  ;  and  frankly  as  he  handled  England,  his  reputation 
was  perhaps  broader,  if  not  higher,  abroad  than  at  home.  These 
notes  are  republished  from  the  Atlantic  Monthly,  and  are  chip5 


|$69l]  '  Quarterly  Book-Table.  153 

::->:«  ihc  hatchet  of  a  unique  spirit.     Sad  to  say,  that  upon  the 
mott  inspiring  and  holiest  of  all  subjects  his  heart  was 
Cold  as  the  rocks  on  Tornea's  frost  brow. 


l±sv£*ratum  of  James  M'CosTi,  D.D.,  LL.B.,  as  President  of  The  College  of  New 
Jersey,  Princeton,  October  27,  1868.  870.,  pp.  96.  New  York:  Robert  Carter 
t  Brothers. 

Tbe  pages  of  our  Quarterly,  both  editorial  and  contributed,  have 
.•■.-ted  our  exalted  estimate  of  Dr.  M'Cosh's  abilities.  lie  has 
mtasnred  a  victorious  sword  with  the  mightiest  anti-Christian 
thinker  of  the  age,  John  Stuart  Mill.  And  we  avail  ourselves  of 
•.Lis  Inaugural  to  say,  that  such  a  man  would  be  an  accession  to 
lay  country.  We  trust  that  his  success  in  his  new  office  will  add 
lo  his  great  and  well-merited  reputation.  The  address  itself  bears 
on  its  every  page  the  tokens  of  a  master  mind. 


."•     X-w  England  Tragedies.     By  Hejcry  W.  Loxgfellow.     1.  John  Endicott. 
3,  Gile3  Corey,  of  the  Salem  Farms.  12 mo.,  pp.  179.    Boston :  Ticknor  &  Fields. 

The  persecution  of  the  Quakers  and  Salem  Witchcraft — shall  we 
never  hear  the  last  of  them  ? — furnish  Longfellow  the  instigation 
y»\  excuse  for  these  two  performances.  Poems  we  can  hardly 
<ru\  them,  but  rlueut  prose  in  measured  lines,  with  initial  capitals. 
They  add  no  value  to  literature,  no  needed  lesson  of  toleration  to 
•  '••  Protestantism  of  our  free  age,  no  increase  to  the  great  and 
Merited  reputation  of  Longfellow. 


Periodicals. 

The  "  Christian  Advocate  "  at  Nashville  is  edited  by  Dr.  T. 
O.  SuannswB,  a  brief  acquaintance  with  whom,  in  our  young  man- 

""1,  left  upon  our  memory  the  impress  of  a  Christian  gentleman, 
* -:-"-  confirmed  by  all  our  slight  interchanges,  public  and  private. 
"'  a  late  Advocate  Dr.  Summers  favors  our  Quarterly  with  an  ex- 
tended and  free,  yet  courteous  notice,  one  point  of  which,  as  in- 
'"Iviiifr  both  a  person  and  a  principle,  justilics  a  brief  response  on 

;ir  part.  He  considers  our  notice  of  Dr.  Pearne's  pamphlet  as 
■creditable  to  our  Quarterly,  assuring  us  that  Dr.  Pearne  is  a 
"•honorable  "carpet-bagger,"  adding  that  he  has  no  doubt  that 
«•  word  of  the  editor  of  the  Advocate  would  be  believed  by  us 
uI*>n  any  other  subject.     We  assure  the  Editor  that  we  believe 


154:  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

him  upon  this  point ;  that  is,  we  believe  that  from  his  stand-point, 
and  with  his  prepossessions,  he  speaks  intentional  truth.  But, 
then,  intentional  truth  is  not  always  actual  accuracy.  We  too 
have  our  stand-point.  We  knew  Dr.  Pearne  in  his  boyhood. 
He  is  now  in  the  full  prime  of  manhood,  and  during  his  extended 
ministerial  career  no  imputation  has  ever  reached  us  on  the  purity 
of  his  character,  save  this,  borne  on  the  breeze  from  the  South. 
He  too  is  known  to  us  as  a  Christian  gentleman,  in  no  way 
inferior  in  our  view,  as  such,  to  Dr.  Summers  himself.  The  very 
epithet  "  carpet-bagger,"  with  which  Dr.  Summers  compromises 
himself  more  than  he  does  Dr.  Pearne,  indicates  his  stand-point. 
Dr.  P.  has  gone  to  Nashville  as  an  accredited  minister  of  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church  to  preach  the  Gospel,  to  establish 
Churches  of  that  denomination,  to  promote  the  cause  of  education, 
of  free  and  liberal  Christian  and  loyal  sentiment  in  that  sec- 
tion. Dr.  S.,  if  we  rightly  understand  him,  holds  that  Dr.  Pearne 
has  no  right  to  do  all  this  work.  There  is  a  sectional  boundary 
line  which  a  northerner  has  not  a  right  to  pass,  with  such  a  mission, 
without  the  consent  of  the  "  southerners."  They  are  the  right- 
ful proprietors  of  that  section,  and  are  entitled  to  exclude  all  out- 
siders from  entering  without  their  permission.  That  right  of  ex- 
clusion we  deny  to  exist,  either  in  the  North  or  South.  We  are 
one  nation,  one  country.  We  are  a  common  family  in  that  one 
home.  The  citizens  of  each  section  have  a  perfect  equal  right  in 
every  other  section.  Dr.  Summers  has  just  as  much  right  here  in 
New  York  as  the  editor  of  the  Methodist  Quarterly,  to  preach, 
publish,  establish  southern  Churches,  or  prosecute  any  other  Chris- 
tian occupation.  And  Dr.  Pearne  has  just  as  good  a  right  for  all 
such  purposes  in  Nashville  as  Dr.  Summers.  Dr.  Deems  is  now  in 
New  York,  "a  carpet-bagger  "  from  the  South.  He  testified  in  the 
last  southern  General  Conference  to  the  courtesy  with  which  lie  had 
here  been  treated.  And  now  we  must  say  that  the  prepossession 
from  which  Dr.  Summers  speaks  seems  to  us  a  remnant  of  the  old 
spirit  established  by  the  institution  of  slavery,  which  for  long  years 
would  have  made  it  unsafe  to  the  life  of  the  editor  of  this  Quar- 
terly, as  an  antislavery  man,  to  have  visited  the  interior  of  the 
South  ;  and  which  enabled  that  bold  demagogue,  Stephen  A.  Doug- 
las, to  stand  up  and  utter  the  infamous  boast  that  there  were  fif- 
teen States  in  which  none  but  a  friend  of  slavery  could  exist  alive. 
Until  Dr.  Summers  can  exorcise  Ids  soul  of  the  last  remnant  of 
that  spirit,  and  can  concede  to  every  American  citizen  his  just 
rights  upon  every  part  of  the  American  soil,  let  him  not  complain 
if  the  citizens  of  other  sections,  who  have  been  for  past  long  years 


|$fl>,J  Quarterly  Book -Table.  155 

y  aracbed  from  the  South,  entertain  a  slight  distrust  in  the  accu- 
,  j    of  his  views  when  the  character  of  an  incomer  from  the 
S'orth  is  the  point  in  question. 

Than  this  policy  for  the  South  uothing  can  be  more  suicidal.     It 
-,  . kiiied  her  in  the  political  balance  until  her  power  was  depart- 
ed when  she  sought  to  restore  it  by  war,  it  laid  her  at  the 
■    •   of  the  more  liberalized  section.     Let  her  pursue  it  still,  by 
..  mnciog  immigrants,  by  fomenting  internal  strife  and  insecurity, 
x-.  i  the  census  of  1SY0  will  reduce  the  once  proud  and  dominant 
South  to  a  mere  South-eastern  margin  of  the  Great  Republic,  an 
irely  insignificant  element  in  the  national  whole.     Every  day 
ko<]  every  hour  of  persistence   in  this  policy  is  hastening   that 
>  it  able  destiny.     Agaiust  that  result  what  is  the  remedy?     A 
",  united,  peaceful  population.      The  faster  the    South,  the 
:  lure  South-eastern  margin,  can  travel  to  that  result,  the  securer 
-ill  he  her  future.     Let  her,  with  all  her  soul,  make  a  Northern 

•  1  European  immigration,  of  whatever  creed,  political  or  relig- 
i,  heartily   and   hospitally  welcome,  into  her    broad,    inviting 

s.  Let  her  renounce  her  oppressions  of  her  own  sable  sons, 
';  i  give  them  the  fullest  and  noblest  enfranchisement.  Let  her 
t  >'i  her  soil  with  agricultural  appliances,  set  her  rail-cars  rolling, 
**•  1  Iter  spindles  whirling.  Thus,  and  thus  alone,  she  will  secure 
1 1  r  own  prosperity,  and  promote  the  well-being  of  the  nation 
:  w  liich  she  forms  a  part.  She  can  mount  the  car  of  destiny  and 
rule  within  it  to  fortune,  or  she  can  lay  herself  across  the  track 
''\  be  crushed  beneath  its  wheel.  Dr.  Summers  and  his  co- 
litors  can  do  their  share  in  pandering  to  and  cherishing  the 
Barrow  sectionalisms  by  which  the  North  is  provoked  and  the 
South  is  ruined,  or  in  throwing  oft*  the  shackles  and  putting  her 
forward  in  her  new  career.  But  we  here  assure  him  that  it  is  the 
N  tith-eastern,  and  not  the  Northern,  or  rather  the  National,  destiny 
U»ai  is  at  stake.  We  are  to  be  (whatever  our  South-eastern  margin 
I  leases)  a  continent-wide  republic,  before  whom  the  governments 
'  :  '■!:<-•  earth  must  bow  in  reverence,  and  to  whom  the  peoples  of  the 

•  •r;'i   will  look  with  admiration  and    gladness.     Our  own  noble 

•  l-vh,  (would  that  she  included  in  harmony  and  unity  with  her- 
'•h  every  American  religious  body  that  calls  itself  Methodist !) 
'JTnpathizing    with    the   best  spirit  of  the  age,  loyal  alike  to  the 

M  of  Christ  and  the  national  greatness,  will  spread  abroad  her 
'  k"*ngeUzing  power,  covering  the  entire  national  area,  and  knowing 
,,,J  limits  to  her  missionary  enterprise. 

*'r.  Summers  expresses  the  wish  that  our  "otherwise  mag- 
•wcent  Quarterly  "  would  avoid  those  topics  on  which  we  are  so 


156  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

deeply  divided.  It  would  be  pleasant,  we  assure  him,  to  have  no 
truths  to  utter  and  no  questions  existing  upon  which  all  sections 
could  not  coincide.  On  those  questions  we  endeavor  to  speak, 
frankly,  indeed,  yet  free  from  every  partisan  animosity  or  desire 
for  mere  sectional  triumph.  But  we  purpose  to  edit  a  live 
periodical ;  and  for  our  Quarterly  to  doze  and  snore  while"  the 
greatest  of  civil  wars,  the  emancipation  of  four  millions,  and  the 
rehabilitation  of  a  new  and  magnificent  nation  are  passing  under 
its  nose,  would  prove  it  "  dead  while  it  liveth."  No  reconciliation, 
no  reunion,  can  arise  from  silence,  or  the  sacrifice  of  any  principle 
for  which  the  blood  of  a  half  million  has  been  spilt.  The  only 
possible  platform  of  union  for  the  future  is  the  acceptance  by  all 
parties  of  those  grand  conclusions  which  the  logic  of  humanity, 
the  logic  of  Christianity,  and  the  logic  of  events  have  alike 
demonstrated  forever.  From  his  eminent  talents  and  commanding 
position  in  his  Church,  there  is  much  that  Dr.  Summers  can  do 
for  that  consummation,  and  we  would  welcome  him  as  a  co- 
laborer  in  that  field. 

Tiie  "  Ladies'  Repository,"  under  the  editorial  care  of  Dr. 
"Wiley,  paying  us  its  regular  monthly  visits,  sustains  its  aucient 
honors,  and  we  trust  its  old  subscription  list,  undiminished,  aud 
improved  by  time  aud  talent.  The  satisfaction  of  the  Church  with 
her  official  editorial  corps  is  strikingly  evinced  by  the  fact  that  so 
fow  changes  were  made  by  our  late  General  Conference.  Our 
quondam  editorial  brother,  Dr.  Eddy,  is  promoted — we  use  the 
word  in  sober  seriousness — to  the  regular  pastorate;  and  Dr. 
Mekril  has  already  given  good  proof  of  his  efficiency  in  the 
Western.  To  all  our  Methodist  Editors,  official  and  unofficial,  the 
Quarterly  tenders  her  New  Year  good  wishes. 

"Harper's  Magazine"  is  the  monthly  for  the  million.  Its 
opening  pages,  selected  from  the  most  valuable  standard  publica- 
tions of  that  house,  illustrated  with  pictures,  insinuate  an  unsus- 
pected amount  of  "solid  reading"  into  the  heads  of  the  popular 
readers.  Its  central  interior  furnishes  a  varied  miscellany  of 
original  matter.  "The  beginning  of  the  end"  exhibits  the  Edi- 
torial wisdom,  and  the  end  of  the  end  gives  you  a  sharp  Punch. 
The  pen  of  Curtis  and  the  pencil  of  Nast  sustain  the  high  title 
of  the  Journal  of  Civilization  ;  the  demands  of  the  most  ultra- 
civilization  are  amply  supplied  in  the  pictorial  pages  of  the  Bazar. 

"Every  Month  "  is  the  title  of  the  monthly  bulletin  issued  in 
behalf  of  Dr.  Deems's  Church,  "The  Church  of  the  Strangers,"  at 
the  New  York  University.     The  sermons  of  Dr.  Deems,  one  in 


I .    .  ]  •         Quarterly  Boole -Table.  157 

(l  !,  number,  are  eloquent,  practical,  and  pointed.  Several  of 
\\  riii,  though  no  imitations,  might  be  insei-ted  in  a  volume  of 
llmry  Ward  Beeehcr's  sermons  -without  any  detection  by  the 
fr;,  |.-r  of  different  authorship  or  inferior  quality. 


Pk  /■':''<  Repository:  a  Monthly  Magazine  chiefly  devoted  to  the  Advocacy  and 
Diffusion  of  the  Yiew  of  a  Future  Life  and  Immortality,  as  the  Gift  of  God, 
through  Jesus  Christ,  to  the  Righteous  alone,  by  a  Resurrection  from  the  Dead. 
Kiris  Wexdell,  Editor.     Salem,  Mass.:  Published  by  the  Editor. 

Mc  Wendell  is  a  candid  and  Christian-like  advocate  of  the  doc- 
trine of  the  complete  cessation  from  existence  of  the  wicked.  His 
theory  has  a  materialistic  basis,  affirming  soul  or  thought  to  be  but 
a  manifestation  from  the  bodily  organism.  "  Thought  is  the  motion 
'  f  the  brain."  How  this  denial  of  the  separate  existence  of  pure 
ipirit  is  saved  from  materializing  God,  and  so  producing  either 
Atheism  or  Pantheism,  we  are  not  sufficiently  read  in  the  system 
to  understand.  The  theory  is,  in  fact,  the  counterpart  in  theology 
to  Mr.  Darwin's  "natural  selection"  in  science.  As  living  bodily 
beings  attain  permanent  existence  by  meeting  the  physical  condi- 
tions of  existence,  so  spiritual  beings  attain  eternal  existence  by 
■keeling  the  moral  conditions.  The  attainment  of  eternal  life  by 
the  blessed  is  simply  "the  survival  of  the  fittest;"  the  loss  of  eter- 
tii  lite  is  simply  failure  to  exhibit  its  conditions,  a  blasting  in  the 
bed  of  the  living  flower,  a  ceasing  to  exist  of  all  that  fail.  Hence 
the  preacher  in  his  address  to  sinners  dwells  not  on  pictures  of  the 
Hernal  agonies  of  the  lost,  but  rather  upon  the  positive  duty  and 
;'  ry  of  avoiding  disastrous  failure,  and  attaining  to  "  glory,  honor, 
*•  1  eternal  life." 

Mr.  Wendell  quotes  one  of  our  editorial  brethren  as  saying: 
*'  Annihilation  [-ism?]  has  invaded  the  Church.     Its  advocates  are 

"ily  men  of  faith  and  prayer,  and  of  Churches  that  are  built  on 
rt  and  are  honored  with  the  presence  of  the  Spirit.     It  has 

•  "io  seeming  support  in  some  texts  of  Scripture.  Yet  it  is  an 
•*ror  which,  if  clung  to  too  obstinately  and  exclusively,  will  strip 

4  advocates  of  power  with  God  and  man.  It  is  adopted  usually 
*•*  »  refuge  from  the  doctrine  of  eternal  fire.  But  the  refuge  is 
•owe  than  that  which  it  seeks  to  escape.  Who  would  not  prefer 
•' '  dungeon  to  the  cord,  the  rack  to  the  guillotine?  Death  is  the 
"•  Ui.st  punishment  man  or  God  can  inflict.  Eternal  life  in  death 
■  preferable  to  eternal  annihilation." 
*ow  did  we  believe  this,  that  annihilation  is  more  terrible  than 

*  'n>:d  misery,  we  should  consider  the  greatest  difficulty  in  Chris- 
"*■  theodicy  to  have  attained  a  solution.     The  most  terrible  of  all 


158  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.      •        [January, 

punishments  for  sin  is  attained  without  the  slightest  pretext  fur  a 
charge  of  injustice  upon  the  divine  Inflictor.  No  one  can  claim  a 
moment  of  future  existence  as  a  right,  or  its  withdrawal  as  a 
wrong.  God  can  justly,  at. his  pleasure,  drop  anj-  being  into  in- 
stant nothingness.  And  now,  if  this  be  the  most  terrible  of  dooms, 
then  God  can  inflict  it,  or  permit  it,  for  sin  great  or  small,  and  the 
most  captious  caviller  can  utter  no  complaint.  Uuiversalism  could 
not  charge  this  theory  with  injustice,  nor  orthodoxy  charge  it  with 
immoral  tendency  in  lightening  the  penalty  of  sin.  But  for  our 
individual  part  we  would  infinitely  prefer  the  brief  "guillotine" 
to  the  eternal  "  rack." 

Universalism  has  been  condemned  by  the  Church  in  all  ages. 
Yet  the  general  Church,  through  a  large  part  of  its  history,  softened 
the  terms  of  hell  by  the  doctrine  of  purgatory.  The  Reformation 
removed  that  mitigation,  and  hence,  especially  at  the  present  day, 
individual  minds  and  large  classes  of  Christian  thinkers  take  relief 
in  some  softening  view.  Tertullian  could  exult  at  the  prospect  of 
beholding  the  writhings  of  the  wicked  in  eternal  physical  fire,  and 
Edwards  held  that  the  righteous  would  glorify  God  in  view  of  the 
justice  of  that  retribution.  Milder  theologians  have  removed  the 
physical  lire  and  transformed  it  into  a  spiritual  element.  Among 
peculiar  yet  evangelical  thinkers  at  the  present  day,  Dr.  Stier  holds 
that  none  but  those  who  commit  the  sin  against  the  Holy  Ghost 
suffer  eternal  misery ;  Dr.  Bushnell  holds  to  the  eternally  diminish- 
ing yet  never-ending  amount  of  the  sinner's  being,  and  so  of  his  suf- 
fering ;  our  respected  Dr.  True  (if  we  rightly  understand)  favors  the 
doctrine  of  a  perpetual  cessation  of  consciousness  rather  than  of  ex- 
istence— deconsciousizatio?i  rather  than  annihilation — which,  we 
suppose,  leaves  the  insensate  spiritual  substance  a  burnt-out  nature, 
a  monumental  cinder,  attesting  the  accursedness  of  sin  once  exist- 
ing ;  the  late  amiable  and  scholarly  Professor  Hudson  taught  in 
his  able  work,  "Debt  and  Grace,"  that  the  spirits  of  the  wicked 
survive  until  their  resurrection,  and  then,  being  plunged  into  the 
lake  of  fire,  sink  to  nothingness;  aud  Mr.  Wendell  maintains  that 
their  existence  penally  terminates  at  death  without  a  spiritual  re- 
viviscencc  or  a  bodily  resurrection.  All  these  have  exhibited,  both 
in  their  writings  aud  characters,  the  evidences  of  the  purest  Chris- 
tian and  evangelical  spirit.  The  generic  agreement  between  them 
and  the  ordinary  belief  in  the  Church  is  in  holding  to  the  remedi- 
less ruin  of  the  finally  impenitent,  the  eternity  of  punishment  either 
positive  or  of  loss — endless  woe.  Betweeu  this  entire  body  and 
the  Universalists,  or  Kestorationists,  there  is  a  broad  separation  in 
that  the  former  unanimously  affirm  the  eternity  of  the  ruin  wrought 


i^,f)J  Quarterly  Book-Table.  159 

|  ,  .in  on  Hie  unrepentant.    The  whole  are  able  to  stand  on  one 

J*tform,  however  different  their  minor  shades  of  orthodoxy  or 

.doxy,  against  the  prevalent  Socinianism,  Pelagianism,  Uni- 

ir'.nlism,  Rationalism,  and  Infidelity.    And  if  we  concede  that  the 

illy  they  maintain  is  as  deterring  from  sin  as  the  high  orthodox 

■.v.  we  have  no  great  reason  to  assail  them,  as  we  may  Univer- 

»x!i-im,  for  the  dangerous  nature  of  their  heterodoxy.     We  are 

bound,  as  Christian  brethren,  without  excluding  them  from  the 

Kritisrelic  Church,  to  discuss  their  peculiarities,  salvafide  et  salva 

'.■-in,  in  their  own  conceded  Christian  spirits. 

Our  "Christian  Advocate"  is  quoted  by  Mr.  Wendell  as  saying, 

•J.st  so  little  is  the  doctrine  of  eternal  misery  preached  in  our  pul- 

ptU  that  Universalists  might  sit  under  our  ministrations  without 

being  often  disturbed.     Dr.  Todd,  of  Pittsfield,  not   long   since 

tfatcd  and  lamented  the  same  fact  as  generally  prevalent,  and  ad- 

v.'.-l  a  return  to  the  former  style.     Our  impression  is,  that  less 

:  liance  on  the  constant  preaching  of  hell-fire  has,  with  exceptions, 

lUays  been  one  of  the  differences  of  Methodism  from  Calvinism. 

l>r.  Clarke  on  2  Cor.  v,  11,  reprobates  the  "constant  declamation 

I  <11  and  perdition."  Rev.  Thomas  Yasey,  of  the  British  Con- 
■  ence,  speaking  of  the  conversion  at  Newcastle  of  "some  of  the 
*<•  r-t  specimens  of  humanity,"  says :  "Now,  with  him  it  was  a 
I  ivim  not  to  preach  hell  and  damnation  to  such  people,  but  always 
I*  take  the  most  encouraging  subject,  such  as  the  love  of  God,  the 
power  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  the  possibility  of  their  getting  saved  and 
tJetated.M     We  heard  a  leading  Methodist  revivalist,  a  few  years 

•  ••"•,  remark,  that  a  few  evenings  previous  he  had  put  a  check  upon 
-  Bow  of  penitent  feeling  by  preaching  "  too  much  of  a  terror  ser- 

:  •'*     In  this  respect,  as  in  a  great  many  others,  we  suspect  that 

Methodism  has  anticipated  the  age.     It  has  held  forth  the  loftiest 

»«n«of  religious  happiness  and  holiness,  and  has  had  a  boundless 

»»riety  of  cheering  and  aspiring  views,  which  have  led  the  souls 

f  men  joyously  upward,  yet  ever  retaining  in  view,  without  special 

'  "1*,  the  dark  back-ground  of  remediless  woe  to  be  escaped, 

goua  to  that  bottomless  gulf  of  destruction  which  even  the 

•*•  rationalistic  physicist  is  obliged  to  recognize  as  underlying 

feet  of  the  great  body  of  the  sensual  world.     So  far  as  we 

;      *  >t   is   in  this  channel  that  the   groat  current   of  our  most 

al  and  most  glorious  revivals  has  triumphantly  flowed. 

Having  made  this  subject  a  specialty,  Mr.  Wendell  is  an  acute  and 

•  "ridable  debater.     Those  who  propose  to  deal  with  him   would 
io  well  first  to   understand   his   whole  system  and  way  of  man- 

i  a  body  of  well-known  texts,  otherwise  they  may  find  them- 


160  MetJiodkt  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

selves  unwarily  entrapped,  escaping,  if  at  all,  only  by  the  loss  of 
some  logical  member  of  their  argument.  His  fault  seems  to  be  the 
interpreting  every  expression  on  the  part  of  leading  theologians 
acknowledging  some  favorable  phase  of  his  views,  as  a  commencing 
or  covert,  agreement  with  him.  This  is  very  unnecessary,  though  a 
far  more  amiable  error  than  the  opposite  habit  of  making  the 
widest  possible  distances,  and  the  most  numerous  possible  oppo- 
nents and  foes.  , 

The  Herald  of  Health  and  Journal  of  Physical  Culture,     Svo.     New  York  :  Miller. 
Wood,  &,  Co. 

This  journal  is  well  calculated  to  furnish  that  prevention  which  is 
worth  a  thousand  pounds  of  cure.  It  teaches  how  to  preserve 
health,  how  to  avoid  disease,  and  how  to  establish  and  maintain 
the  bodily  strength,  while  it  inculcates  an  invaluable  amount 
of  practical  ethics.  Such  a  periodical  is  indispensable  for  circulat- 
ing those  principles  which  are  of  the  highest  importance  in  our 
highly  artificial  state  of  society.  Many  of  its  articles  are  from 
our  best  writers,  and  in  the  higher  style  of  literature.  The  little 
subscription  price  may  save  a  big  doctor's  bill. 


Sund-ay-Sdiool   Journal  for    Teachers  and  Young  People.     Rev.  J.   H.  Yixcext, 

Editor.  Svo.  New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan. 
Under  Mr.  Vincent's  hand  the  Journal  shows  a  new  outside  and  a 
new  inside.  The  wise  division  of  labor  in  our  great  Sunday-school 
departments  is  very  apparent  in  the  beautified  appearance  and 
rich  contents  of  the  work.  A  versatile  invention,  calling  now 
methods  and  contrivances  into  existence,  appears  on  every  page.  It 
is  a  live  issue,  and  will  aid  to  make  alive  Sunday-school  department. 


Tfte   Home  Monthly.     Devoted  to  Literature  and  Religion.    A.  B.  Stark,  Editor. 
Svo.,  pp.  1G0.     Nashville:  Southern  Methodist  Publishing  Houso.     1S63. 

The  Southern  Methodist  Quarterly  is  not  yet  resumed,  and  this 
periodical  supplies  the  higher  reading  for  the  Southern  Church. 
It  is  a  handsome  publication.  It  embraces  in  its  scope  not  only 
theology  and  religion,  but  poetry  and  prose  fiction.  The  No- 
vember number  contains  a  brief  article  on  "  Woman  Suffrage," 
treating  the  subject  in  a  spirit  of  candor  and  reflective  thought. 


Plymouth  Pulpit.     A  "Weekly  Publication  of  Sermons  Preached  by  Henry  WabD 

Bekcuer.     New  York:  J.  13.  lord  &  Co.     18G8. 
We  need  only  announce  that  this  unique  periodical  appeal's  in 
handsome  form,  and  will  be  doubtless  welcomed  by  thousands  of 
readers. 


|$69j  Quarterly  Book -Table.  161 


Juvenile. 

>.;  Base;  or,  What  Edward  Learned  at  School.  By  William  Everett. 
Ktrated.  Tinted  paper,  red  and  gold.  12mo.,  pp.  282.  Boston:  Lee  & 
;  ird.     1368. 

"    .if  Stage.      A.  Series  of  Dramas.  Comedies,  Burlesques,  and  Farces,  for 
.  »blic  Exhibitions  and  Private   Theatricals.     By  George  M.  Baker.     Tinted 
..  r.  red  and  gold.     12mo.,  pp.  290.     Boston:  Lee  &  Shepard.     13C8. 
;.  i  of  Elm  Island,     By  Rev.  Elijah  Kellogg.      12mo.,  pp.  265.  Boston: 
Jxv  i  Shepard.     1869. 

of  Fortune;  or,  Half  Bound  the  World.     By  Oliver  Optic,   Author  of 
foung  America  Abroad,"  '-The  Army  and  Navy  Stories,"  etc.    12mo.,  pp.  303. 
Bornon:  Lee  &  Shepard.     1S6S. 
:>'■■!  Dimple   Out   West.     By  Sophia  Mat,  Author  of  "Little  Prudy  Stories." 

;  lustrated.     16mo.,  pp.  171.     Boston:  Lee  &  Shepard.     1869. 
X-A*  or  Break;  or,  the  Rich  Man's  Daughter.     By  Oliver  Optic,   Author  of 
•  Yonng  America  Abroad,"   "Army  and  Navy  Stories,"  etc.     12mo.,  pp.  328. 
ton:  Lee  &  Shepard.    1869. 
•  and  Fairies.     Stories  for  Little  Children.     By  Lucy  Randall  Comfort. 
With  Engravings.     12mo.,  pp.  259.     New  York :  Harper  &  Brothers.     1S68. 

Hearer  Boy  who  became  a  Missionary,  being  the  Life  and  Labors  of  David 
LMngston.  By  H.  G.  Adams.  12mo.,  pp.  319.  New  York:  Robert  Carter  & 
Brothers.    1868. 

Carlton  &  Lanahan  have  issued  the  following  juveniles  : 
•',    Lane  and  other  Stories  in   Rhyme.     Illustrated.     Square   8vo.,  pp.   140. 
K'sf  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan. 
'      •  Seventeen  to  Thirty.     The  Town  Life  of  a  Youth  from  the  Country;  its  Trials. 
I  -.^.aiious,  and  Advantages.     Lessons  from  the  History  of  Joseph.      By  T. 
toxET.     12mo.,  pp.  184.   ^New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan.     1868. 

I  » Reason;  or,  the  Little  Cripple.    By  Mrs.  S.  C.  Hall.     With  illustrations. 
•'•  quarto,  colored  paper,  pp.  62.    New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan. 
'  Parables  of  our  Lord  Explained  and  Applied.     By  Rev.  Francis  Bourdellon, 
K  A.    12mo.,  pp.  327.     New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan. 


Pamphlets. 

■■  '■•■-; n  Separation  from  the  World.  Its  Philosophy,  Obligation,  and  Extent. 
'':*..  Jcred,  with  Especial  Reference  to  Popular  Amusements.  By  Rev.  H.  S. 
!'Un  M.A.,  Author  of  "  Gift  of  Power,"  etc.     Second  Edition.     12mo.,  pp.  52. 

'  -  Uyn,  iscs. 

»  Were  led  in  a  former  Quarterly  to  put  the  question  :  Which, 

lively,  are  the  amusements  that  a  Christian  may  indulge,  and 

*wch  must  he  condemn  ?     We  were  answered  in  the  Advocate, 

*•  alone  may  be  practiced   which   are  conducive  to  the  glory 

("K1;  and  by  Zion's  Herald,  Those  which  can  be  taken  in  the 

•::'<-'  of  the  Lord  Jesus.     Neither  of  these  replies  touched  our 

"tlf,ii,  which  still  remained  in  another  form:  Which  amusements 


162  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [January, 

are  consistent  with  the  glory  of  God,   and  which  may  be  taken 
in  the  name  of  the  Lord  Jesus? 

Mr.  Piatt  here  undertakes  this  answer,  and  it  must  be  at  lea<t 
conceded  that  he  realizes  the  question  he  is  to  meet.  He  names 
the  specific  allowable  amusements,  and  ably  gives  the  reason.  II,- 
tells  us  the  which  and  the  why.  Those  who  desire  to  know  his 
answer  will  do  well  to  study  his  sermon.  It  is  prefaced  with  an 
introduction  by  Dr.  Cuyler. 


Miscellaneous. 

Tibbals  &  Co.,  Nassau-street,  New  York,  have  issued  a  hand- 
some edition,  at  a  reasonable  price,  of  Stier's  Words  of  Jesus. 
We  have  so-  frequently  and  so  strongly  commended  this  work  that 
•we  need  only  express  our  pleasure  at  its  appearance. 

Dr.  IIowelTs  Family.     By  Mrs.  H.  B.  Goodwix.     12roo.,  pp.  30!.     Boston:  Lee  k 

Shepard.     1809. 
through  the  Dork  to  the  Day.     A  Story  of  Discipline.     By  Mrs.  Jexxtk  F.  Will- 
ing.    Tinted  paper,  red  and  gold.      12mo.,  pp.  339.      Cincinnati :  Hitchcock  .;- 

Walden.     1809. 
Constance  Aylmer.     A  Story  of  the  Seventeenth  Century.     By  H.  F.  P.     12mo., 

pp.  347.     New  York:  Scribner  k  Co. 
The  Opium   Habit.     With  Suggestions  as  to  the  Remedy.      12mo.,  pp.  335.     New 

York;  narper  k  Brothers. "  1808. 
Jf  Yes.  and  Perhaps.     Four  Possibilities  and  Six  Exaggerations,  with  some  bit*  of 

Fact.  By  Edward  E.  Hale.  12mo.,  pp.  290.  Boston :  Ticknor  &  Fields.  ]v,;v 
Genoa's   Shield.     A  Story  of  the  Reformation.      Bv  Rev.   "W.   M  Blackburn. 

IGnio.,  pp.  325.     New  York:  M.  W.  Dodd.     1868." 
Madam    Therese;   or  the  Volunteers  of  '92.      By   Mm.   Erckmaxx-Ctiartrain. 

Translated    from    the   thirteenth   edition.      "With    ten    full    page   Illustration?. 

Green  and  gilt.     12mo.,  pp.  289.     New  York:  Scribner  &  Co.     1869. 
Margaret     A   Story  of  Life  in  a  Prairio  Home.     By  Lixdox.      12mo.,  pp.  300. 

New  York :  Scribner  k  Co. 
Light  and  Trvth  ;  or.  Bible  Thoughts  and  Themes  of  the  Old  Testament.     By  Ho- 

katius  Boxar,  D.D.      12mo.,  pp.  381.      New  York:  Robert  Carter  k  Brothers. 

186S. 
Claudia.     By  Amanda  M.  Douglass,  Author  of  "In  Trust,"  etc,     12mo.,  pp.  Ml. 

Boston :  Lee  &  Shepard.     1868. 
Gulden  Truths.     12mo.,  pp.  243.     Boston  :  Lee  k  Shepard.     1808. 
Studies  of  Character  from  the  Old  T^tament.     By  Thomas  Guthrie,  D.D.,  Editor 

of  the   "Sunday  Magazine."     12mo.,   pp.   329.     New  York:  Robert  Carter  i 

Brothers.     1809. 
The  Pearl  of  the  Parables.    Notes  on  Luke  xv,  11-32.     By  the  late  James  Hamil- 
ton. D.D.     12mo.,  pp.  274.     New  York:  Robert  Carter  k  Brothers.     1S09. 
The  Little  Spaniard;  or,  Old  Jose's  Grandson.   By  May  Manxerino.    12mo.,  pp.  221. 

Boston:  Leo  k  Shepard.     1809. 
Wind-  Wafted  Seed.     Kdited  by  Normax  Mact.eod  and  Thomas  Guthrie.     12mo., 

pp.  413.     New   York :  Robert  Carter  k  Brothers.     1809. 
Camera  from  English  History,  from  Rollo  to  Edward  II.     By  the  Author  of  "The 

Heir  of  Redclyffe."     12mo.,  pp.  475.     New  York :   D.  Appleton  &  Co.     1809. 


If  09.J  Quarterly  Book -Table.  163 

.".-  I  •''  of  George  Stephenson,  and  of  his  son,  Rtbcrt  Stephenson.    Comprising:  a  His- 
•  r  of  the  Invention  arid  Introduction  of  the  Railway  and  Locomotive.     By  the 
\  ilhor  of  "  Self-Help,"  "  The  Huguenots,"  etc.     With  Portraits  and  Numerous 
1    i-'.r:i'.ioos.     12mo.,  pp.  501.     New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers.     1SGS. 
4  T  -ilve  on  Physiology  and   Hygiene.     For  Schools,  Families,  and  Colleges.     By 
J    C  IULTOS,  ML  D.,  Frofessor  in  the  College  of  Physicians  and  Surgeons,  N.  T. 
v.  th  Illustrations.     12mo.,  pp.  399.     New  York:  Harpers  Brothers.     London: 
-..n  Low,  Son,  &  Maston.     1868. 
•    Alphabet  of  Geology;   or,  First  Lessons  in  Geology  and  Mineralogy,  with 
-   rcestiona  on  the  Relations  of  Rocks  to  Soil.     By  S.  R.  Hall,  LL.L\     With 
ations.     12mo.,  pp.  196.     Boston:  Gould  &  Lincoln. 
/    •  .\:ul  Public  Services  of  General  Ulysses  S.  Grant  from  his  Boyhood  to  the  Present 
.   and  a  Biographical  Sketch  of  Hon.   Schuyler    Colfax.     By  Charles   A. 
J'uflps.     Blustrated.     12 mo.,  pp.  344.     Boston:  Lee  &  Shepard. 
X  Practical  IiJroduction   to   Latin   Composition;   for  Schools  and  Colleges.      By 
Ai.ukrt  Harkxess,  Ph.  P.,  Professor  in  Brown  University,  Author  of  a  ''Latin 
Grammar,"  "An  Introductory  Latin  Book,"  etc.     12mo.,  pp.  306.     New  York: 
D  AppletoB  &  Co.     London:"  16  Little  Britain.     1369. 
T  ■  .:-i-:al  Management  in  the  West  and  South  for  Thirty  Years.     Interspersed  with 
Aneodotica]  Sketches  autobiographical!}'  given.     By  Sol.  Smith,  retired  Actor. 
With  fifteen  Illustrations  and  a  Portrait  of  the  Author.     12mo.,  pp.  275.     New 
V.  rk:  Harper  &  Brothers.     1868. 
I   .     aand  Miles'  Walk  across  South  America.    By  Nathaniel  H.  Bishop.    With 
ti  Introduction,   by  Edward  A.  Samuels,  Esq.,  Author  of  "Ornithology  and 
'    '  vy  of  New  Eng'land,"  etc.    12mo.,  pp.  310.    Boston:  Lee  &  Shepard.    1869. 
fl*  Works  of  Charles  Dickens.     With   Illustrations,  by  George  Cruikshank,  John 
Leech,  and  H.  K.  Browne.     Dombey  &  Son,  ''-Id  Curiosity  Shop,   Hard  Times. 
'-:i.o.,  pp.  202.     New  York:  D.  Appleton  &U>.     1868. 


NOTE  FROM  DR.  SCHAFF. 

1!>  the  April  number  of  the  Methodist  Quarterly  Review, 
PP.  207  and  208,  I  find  an  extract  from  a  popular  "  History  of 
«'•  ligions,"  so  called,  compiled  several  years  ago  by  an  obscure 
k-'l">r,  in  which  certaiu  theological  views  are  attributed  to  me 
*oich  I  never  held,  or  which  I  expressly  disowned.  It  is  not  my 
Wtil  to  correct  personal  misrepresentations  of  the  press,  and  I 
*•*•'•  vr  look  notice  of  the  book  referred  to;  but  I  have  so  much 
Ct  for  the  "Methodist  Quarterly  Review,"  and  for  Dr. 
Kidder,  who,  in  a  kind  notice  of  my  "  Church  History,"  makes 
••  extracts   with  apparent  sanction,  at  least  without  express 

'•'i>t,  that  I  must  request  you  to  give  publicity  to  this  protest. 

:-  lha  subject  of  the  Eucharist,  I  never  believed  or  taught  either 
tririvubstantiation  or  consubstantiation,  or  any  kind  of  material  or 
c'  H^rcal  presence,  but  always  held  (in  essential  agreement  with 

v*'»  on  that  point)  to  a  spiritual  real  presence  and  a  spiritual 
tuition  of  Christ's  life  by  faith,  and  faith  only.  I  know  of  no 
•  **«  medium  of  communing  with  Christ  except  through  faith. 

..  PUILIP  SCHAFF. 

■«•  York,  Sept.  7,  1868. 


164: 


Methodist  Quarterly  Review. 


[January, 


PLAN    OF  EPISCOPAL    VISITATION    FOR    1869. 


Conference*. 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

North  Carolina 

Texas 

India  Mission 

South  Carolina    . 

Liberia  Mission 

Kentucky 

Baltimore 

Virginia , 

St.  Louis , 

Central  Pennsylvanif 

West  Virginia 

Wilmington , 

Philadelphia 

New  Jersey 

Missouri 

Newark 

Providence 

Pittsburgh  ...   

Kansas 

New  England 

Washington , 

Nebraska 

New  Hampshire 

New  York 

New  York  East 

Ka-it  German 

Troy 

Vermont 

Wyoming 

Central  New  York  . 
North  Indiana 


rinee. 


Time. 


Maine 

East  Maine 

Germany  and  Switzerland. 

Colorado 

Delaware 

Oregon  

Cincinnati 

East  Genesee 

Des  Moines 

Detroit 

Iowa 

Nevada 

Central  German 

North  Oliio 

North-west  Indiana 

Southern  Illinois 

Central  Ohio 

Michigan 

Indiana 

South-eastern  Indiana 

California 

North-west  German 


Canton,  Miss jan. 

Wesley  Chapel,  New  Orleans Jan.      13 

Union  Chapel,  Alexander  County Jan.      14 

Austin Jan.      21 

Lucknow,  India Feb.     10 

Camden,  S.  C Feb.     11 

Not  given Feb.     IT 

Harrodsburgh Feb.     25 

Foundry  Church,  'Washington  City March    3 

Alexandria March    3 

Bedalia March  10 

Danville March  10 

Clarksburgh March  11 

Wilmington,  Del March  IT 

Philadelphia March  IT 

Millville March  IT 

Chillicothe March  17 

Central  Church,  Newark March  IT 

First  Church.  Fall  River March  24 

New  Philadelphia,  Ohio March  24 

Leavenworth March  24 

Webster,  Mass March  24 

Winchester.  Vs March  25 

Nebraska  City March  81 

Lisbon April     T 

Sine  Sing April      T 

Mhldletown,  Conn April      T 

Philadelphia April      8 

Washington-street  Church,  West  Troy..  April   14 

Notfixed April    15 

Honesdale,  Pa April   15 

Auburn April    15 

Pearl-street  Church,  Richmond April   15 

Watertown April    15 

Saccarappa May      5 

Tine-street  Church,  Bangor Mav     20 

Bremen June    IT 

Central  City,  Col June    24 

Milford,  Del July     22 

Eocene  City Aug.    12 

Hillsborough Aug.    25 

Phelps,  Ontario  County Aug.    25 

Indianola Aug.    26 

Central  Church,  Detroit Sept.      1 

Muscatine Sept.      1 

Washoe  City Sept.      2 

Newport,  Kentucky Sept      2 

Norwalk Sept.      8 

Lafayette Sept.      8 


Vandalia. 


isept. 


Upper  Iowa. 

Illinois 

Wisconsin 

Erie-  .   

Tennessee 

Central  Illinois '. 

West  Wisconsin 

Ohio 

Lock  River '.'.'. 

Genesee 

Hols  ton 

Minnesota 

Bonth- west  German. 

Gee  .-a 

Alabama 


Findley ,   Sept. 

Grand  Paplds Sept. 

Evansville Sept,  15 

Trinity  Church,  Indianapolis SepL  19 

Napa  City Sept.  15 

Second  Church,  Milwaukee Sept.  16 

Independence Sept.  22 

Lincoln,  Logan  County Sept.  22 

Appleton Sept  23 

Franklin,  Venango  County Sept.  29 

Huntingdon,  Carroll  County Sept.  20 

Canton,  Fulton  County Sept  20 

Portage  City Sept.  30 

Centenary  Church,  Marietta Oct  6 

Embury  Church,  Freeport Oct.  6 

Lyndonvllle Oct  6 

Jonesborougb Oct.  T 

Minneapolis Oct.  7 

Darlington,  Iowa Oct  7 

Atlanta Oct  14 

Mount  Hermoa,  Connecuh  County Oct.  21 


i:m..,;.» 

Simpson 

Simpson. 

Ames. 

Simpson. 

Ames. 

Roberts. 

Scott. 

Clark. 

Ames. 

Janes. 

Scott 

Ames. 

Simpson. 

Thomson. 

Ciark. 

Janes. 

Scott 

Clark. 

Ames. 

Janes, 

Thomson. 

Simpson. 

Janes. 

Clark. 

Scott. 

Thomson. 

Simpson. 

Kingsley. 

Thomson. 

Ames. 

Scott 

Janes. 

Clark. 

Clark. 

Clark. 

Kingsley. 

Janes. 

Kingsley. 

Ames. 

Janes, 

Clark. 

Scott 

Thomson. 

Kingsley. 

Ames, 

Janes. 

Clark. 

Thomson. 

Janes. 

Scott 

Ames. 

Simpson. 

Kinsley. 

Ciark. 

Clark. 

Thomson. 

Scott. 

Ames. 

Simpson. 

Thomson. 

Scott 

Janes. 

Clark. 

Ami. 

Simpson. 

Scott 

Thomson. 

Simpson. 

Simpson. 


M.ETH 


ODIST 

Quarterly  Keview. 

APRIL,    1869. 


Act.  I.— THE  RELIGION  OF  THE  ATHENIANS. 

In  hough  one  of  those  remarkable  counter-strokes  of  Divine 

Providence  by  which  the  evil  designs  of  men  are  overruled, 

■ad  made  to  subserve  the  purposes  of  God,  the  Apostle  Paul 

m  brought   to    Athens.      He    walked    beneath   its-  stately 

p  rticoes,  he  entered  its  solemn  temples,  he  stood  before  its 

.•  ■  -Huiis  statuary,  he  viewed  its  beautiful  altars — all  devoted  to 

;  van  worship.     And  "his  spirit  was  stirred  within  him;"  he 

*w  moved  with  indignation  "when  he  saw  the  city  full  of 

wagea  of  the  gods."*     At  the  very  entrance  of  the  city  he 

'  the  evidence  of  this  peculiar  tendency  of  the  Athenians  to 

Bmltiply  the  objects  of  their  devotion  ;  for  here  at  the  gateway 

*M»da  an  image  of  Neptune,  seated  on  horseback,  and  brandish- 

"  -'  the  trident.     Passing  through  the  gate,  his  attention  would 

*  immediately  arrested  by  the  sculptured  forms  of  Minerva, 

'"•t'iUir,  Apollo,  Mercury,  and  the  Muses,  standing  near  a  sanc- 

'  ***7  of  Bacchus.     A    long   street  is  now  before  him,  with 

■*::-i''W,  statues,  and  altars  crowded  on  either  hand.     Walking 

:--o  end  of  this  street,  and  turning  to  the  right,  he  entered 

-^'ora,  a  public  square  surrounded    with   porticoes  and 

n|>lea,  which  were  adorned  with   statuary  and  paintings  in 

Bor  of  the  gods  of  Grecian  mythology.     Amid  the  plane- 

' '  planted  by   the  hand  of  Cimon   are  the  statues  of  the 

"»od  heroes  of  Athens,  Hercules  and  Theseus,  and  the  whole 

*  Laage's  Commentary,  Acta  xvii,  16. 
1  "<>mi  Shkies,  Vol.  XXL— 11 


166  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

series  of  the  Epomymi,  together  with  the  memorials  of  the 
older  divinities  ;  Mercuries  which  gave  the  name  to  the  streets 
on  which  they  were  placed ;  statues  dedicated  to  Apollo  as 
patron  of  the  city  and  her  deliverer  from  the  plague;  and  in 
the  center  of  all  the  altar  of  the  Twelve  Gods. 

Standing  in  the  Marketplace,  and  looking  up  to  the  Areop- 
agus, Pauf  would  see  the  temple  of  Mars,  from  whom  the  hill 
derived  its  name.  And  turning  toward  the  Acropolis,  he 
would  behold,  closing  the  long  perspective,  a  series  of  little 
sanctuaries  on  the  very  ledges  of  the  rocks,  shrines  of  Bacchus 
and  ^Esculapius,  Venus,  Earth,  and  Ceres,  ending  with  the 
lovely  form  of  the  Temple  of  Unwinged  Yictory,  which 
glittered  in  front  of  the  Propyleea. 

°  If  the  Apostle  entered  the  "fivefold  gates,"  and  ascended  the 
flight  of  stone  steps  to  the  platform  of  the  Acropolis,  he  would 
find  the  whole  area  one  grand  composition  of  architecture  and 
statuary  dedicated  to  the  worship  of  the  gods.  Here  stood  the 
Parthenon,  the  Virgin  House,  the  glorious  temple  which  was 
erected  during  the  proudest  days  of  Athenian  glory,  an  entire 
offering  to  Minerva,  the  tutelary  divinity  of  Athens.^  Within 
was  the  colossal  statue  of  the  goddess  wrought  in  ivory  and 
gold.  Outside  the  temple  there  stood  another  statue  of 
Minerva,  cast  from  the  brazen  spoils  of  Marathon ;  and  near 
by  yet  another  brazen  Pallas,  which  was  called  by  pre-emi- 
nence "  the  Beautiful." 

Indeed,  to  whatever  part  of  Athens  the  Apostle  wandered, 
he  would  meet  the  evidences  of  their  "  carefulness  in  religion,' 
for  every  public  place  and  every  public  building  was  a  sanctu- 
ary of  some  god.  The  Metroum,  or  Record  House,  was  a  temple 
to  the  mother  of  the  gods.  The  Council  House  held  statues 
of  Apollo  and  Jupiter,  with  an  altar  to  Yesta.  The  Theater 
at  the  base  of  the  Acropolis  was  consecrated  to  Bacchus.  The 
Pnyx  was  dedicated  to  Jupiter  on  high.  And  as  if,  in  this 
direction,  the  Attic  imagination  knew  no  bounds,  abstractions 
were  deified  ;  altars  were  erected  to  Fame,  to  Energy,  to 
Modesty,  and  even  to  Pity,  and  these  abstractions  were  honored 
and  worshiped  as  gods. 

The  impression  made  upon  the  mind  of  Paul  was,  that  the 
city  was  literally  "full  of  idols,"  or  images  of  the  gods.  This 
impression  is  sustained  by  the  testimony  of  numerous  Greek 


\h •■■)_)  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  lo7 

,.   J   Roman  writers.     Pausanius  declares  that  Athens   "had 

mun  images  than  all  the  rest  of  Greece  ;  "  and  Petronius,  the 

m  satirist,  says,  ''It  was  easier  to  find  a  god  in  Athens 

■  man."* 

No  wonder,  then,  that  as  Paul  wandered  amid  these  scenes 

-pint    was    stirred    in    him."      He    burned    with    holy 

:  tl  to  maintain   the  honor  of  the  true  and  only  God,  whom 

he  saw  dishonored  on  every  side.     He  was  filled  with 

.    u passion  for  those   Athenians  who,  notwithstanding   their 

.-.•  Ilectnal   greatness,  had  changed  the  glory  of  God  into  an 

■_'<•   made  in  the   likeness  of  corruptible   man,    and    who 

.v  worshiped  the  creature  more  than  the  Creator.     The  im- 

•   intended  to  symbolize  the  invisible  perfections   of  God 

usurping  the  place  of  God,  and  receiving  the  worship  due 

t  one  to  him.  'We  may  presume  the  Apostle  was  not  insensible 

I    '.i.o  beauties  of  Grecian  art.     The  sublime  architecture  of 

I'ropylaea  and  the  Parthenon,  the  magnificent  sculpture  of 

ftudias  and  Praxiteles,  could  not  fail  to  excite  his  wonder. 

•  U  bo  remembered  that  those  superb  temples  and  this  glori- 

•  itataary  were  the  creation  of  the  pagan  spirit,  and  devoted 
'  •  |-'!yiheistic  worship.     The  glory  of  the  supreme  God  was 

•••  rured  by  all  this  symbolism.      The  creatures  formed  by 

'»  •!.  the  symbols  of  his  power  and  presence  in  nature,  the 

tfera    of    his    providence    and    moral    government,  were 

•  mng  the  honor  due  to  him.     Over  all  this  scene  of  mate- 
!  •  beauty  and  esthetic  perfection  there  rose  in  dark  and  hideous 

[•ortions  the  errors  and  delusions  and  sins  against  the  living 
**  which  Polytheism  nurtured,  and  unable  any  longer  to  re- 

•  '■  ■■'  himself,  he  commenced  to  "reason"  with  the  crowds  of 

emails  who  stood  beneath  the  shadows  of  the  plane-trees,  or 
•  °god  beneath  the  porticoes  that  surrounded  the  Agora. 
•"':i£  these  groups  of  idlers  were  mingled  the  disciples  of 

l»  and  Epicurus,  who  M  encountered "  Paul.     The  nature 

Uksq  "disputations"  may  be  easily  conjectured.  The 
I '  -'"Us  ot  these  philosophers  are  even  now  familiarly  known  ; 

•'  :it,~,  m  one  form  or  another,  current  in  the  literature  ot^ 
wn  times.     Materialism  and  Pantheism  still  "  encounter  " 

^uybeare  and  Howson's    "Life  and    Epistles  of  St.  Paul;"  also,  art. 
I         H    in  Kticyclopa-diaBrittanica,  whence  our  account  of  tho  "sacred  cbjocta" 
***  is  chiefly  gathered. 


168  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April 

Christianity.  The  Apostle  asserted  the  personal  being  and 
spirituality  of  one  supreme  and  only  God,  who  has  in  diver- 
ways  revealed  himself  to  man,  and  therefore  may  be  "known.'' 
lie  proclaimed  that  Jesus  is  the  fullest  and  most  perfect  rev- 
elation of  God — the  only  "  manifestation  of  God  in  the  flesh." 
lie  pointed  to  his  "  resurrection  "  as  the  proof  of  his  super- 
human character  and  mission  to  the  world.  Some  of  his 
hearers  were  disposed  to  treat  him  with  contempt ;  they  repre- 
sented him  as  an  ignorant  "  babbler,"  who  had  picked  up  a 
few  scraps  of  learning,  and  who  now  sought  to  palm  them  off 
as  a  "  new  "  philosophy.  But  most  of  them  regarded  him  with 
that  peculiar  Attic  curiosity  which  was  always  anxious  to  be 
bearing  some  "  new  thing."  So  they  lead  him  away  from  the 
tumult  of  the  Market-place  to  the  top  of  Mars'  Hill,  where,  in 
its  serene  atmosphere,  they  might  hear  him  more  carefullv, 
and  said,  "  May  we  hear  what  this  new  doctrine  is  whereof 
thou  speakest  ? " 

Surrounded  by  these  men  of  thoughtful  philosophic  mind- 
men  who  had  deeply  pondered  the  great  problem  of  existence, 
who  had  earnestly  inquired  after  the  "first  principles  oi 
things;"  men  who  had  reasoned  high  of  creation,  fate,  and 
providence;  of  right  and  wrong;  of  conscience,  law,  and 
retribution ;  and  had  formed  strong  and  decided  opinions  on 
all  these  questions — he  delivered  his  discourse  on  the  leing,  the 
j/r&vide?ice,  the  spirituality,  and  the  moral  government  of 
God. 

This  grand  theme  was  suggested  by  an  inscription  he  had 
observed  on  one  of  the  altars  of  the  city,  which  was  dedicated 
"  To  the  Unknown  God."  "  Ye  men  of  Athens  !  every  thing 
which  I  behold  bears  witness  to  your  carefulness  in  relhjh'H. 
For  as  I  passed  by  and  beheld  your  sacred  objects  I  found  an 
altar  with  this  inscription,  'to  the  Unknown  God;'  whom, 
therefore,  ye  worship,  though  ye  know  him  not,  [adequate ly.j 
Him  declare  I  unto  you."  Starting  from  this  point,  the  mani- 
fest carefulness  of  the  Athenians  in  religion,  and  accepting 
this  inscription  as  the  evidence  that  they  had  some  presenti- 
ment, some  native  intuition,  some  dim  conception  of  the  One 
True  and  Living  God,  he  strives  to  lead  them  to  a  deeper  knowl- 
edge of  Him.  It  is  here  conceded  by  the  Apostle  that  the 
Athenians  were  a  religious  people.     The  observations  he  had 


.;  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  169 

during  his  short  stay  in  Athens  enabled  him  to  bear 
■ritno*  that  the  Athenians  were  "  a  God-fearing  people,"*  and 
,t  that  fairness  and  candor  demanded  that  this  trait  should 
rcccive  from  him  an  ample  recognition  and   a  fall  acknowl- 
..•  nt.      Accordingly  he  commences  by  saying  in  gentle 
-,  well  fitted  to  conciliate  his  audience,  "  All  things  which 
1  behold  bear  witness  to  your  carefulness  in  religion."       I  re- 
,  iiize  you  as  most  devout ;  ye  appear  to  me  to  be  a  God-fear- 
people,!  for  as  I  passed  by  and  beheld  your  sacred  objects 
1  found  an  altar  with  this  inscription,  "  To  the  Unknown  God," 
■OS  therefore  ye  worship. 

The  assertion  that  the  Athenians  were  "  a  religious  people  " 

«i!i,  to  many  of  our  readers,  appear  a  strange  and  startling 

iterance,  which  has  in  it  more  of  novelty  than  truth.     Kay, 

'.  will  be  shocked  to   hear    the  Apostle  Paul    described 

v  complimenting  these  Athenians — these  pagan  worshipers* — 

0  their  "  carefulness  in  religion."  We  have  been  so  long 
^customed  to  use  the  word  ';  heathen"  as  an  opprobrious 
■  ;  .'Jut— expressing,  indeed,  the  utmost  extremes  of  ignorance, 

'!  barbarism,  and  cruelty,  that  it  has  become  difficult  for  us 
'••  believe  that  in  a  heathen  there  can  be  any  good. 

i'rom  our  childhood  we  have  read  in  our  English  Bibles, 

"  ^  e  men  of  Athens,  I  perceive  in  all  things  ye  are  too  super- 

'■-V  and  we  can  scarcely  tolerate  another  version,  even  if 

1  '  *n  be  shown  that  it  approaches  nearer  to  the  actual  lan- 

•  employed  by  Paul.     We  must,  therefore,  ask  the  patience 
<?'i  candor  of  the  reader,  while  we  endeavor  to  show,  on  the 

•rity  of  Paul's  words,  that  the  Athenians  were  &  "  religious 

: '''',"   and  that  all  our  notions  to  the  contrary  are  founded 

"'  prejudice  and  misapprehension. 

'  irtf,  then,  let  us  commence  even  with  our  English  version  : 

1  <   men  of  Athens,  I  perceive  that  in  all  things  ye  are  too 

'".''■*fU<ous."      And  what  now  is  the  meaning  of  the  word 

^perstition  ? "      It  is  true,  we  now  use  it  only  in  an  evil 

•  to  express  a  belief  in  the  agency  of  invisible,  capricious, 
>n*nt  powers,  which  tills  the  mind  with  fear  and  terror, 

in  every  unexplained  phenomenon  of  nature  an  omen, 
prognostic,  of  some  future  evil.      But  this  is  not  its  proper 

■  l,f>rnmcntary,  in  loco. 
^f  Uforc  ieirjii.— so  imports.    I  recognize  you  as  such." — Lange's  Commentary. 


170  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

and  original  meaning.  Superstition  is  from  the  Latin  super- 
stitio,  which  means  a  superabundance  of  religion,*  an  extreme 
exactitude  in  religious  observance.  And  this  is  precisely  the 
sense  in  which  the  corresponding  Greek  term  is  used  by  the 
Apostle  Paul.  b.eioi6a'movia  properly  means  "  reverence  for  the 
gods."  "It  is  used."  says  Barnes,  "in  the  classic  writers,  in  a 
good  sense,  to  denote  piety  towards  the  gods,  or  suitable  fear 
and  reverence  for  them."  "  The  word,"  says  Lechler,  "  is,  with- 
out doubt,  to  be  understood  here  in  a  good  sense ;  although  it 
seems  to  have  been  intentionally  chosen,  in  order  to  indicate  the 
conception  of  fear,  (Mdco,)  which  predominated  in  the  religion 
of  the  Apostle's  hearers."  f  This  reading  is  sustained  by  the 
ablest  critics  and  scholars  of  modern  times.  Bengel  reads  the 
sentence,  "  I  perceive  that  ye  are  very  religious. n\  Cudworth 
translates  it  thus:  "  Te  are  every  way  more  than  ordinarily 
religious.'1''  §  Conybeare  and  Howson  read  the  text  as  we  have 
already  given  it,  "  All  things  which  I  behold  bear  witness  to 
your  carefulness  in  religion.11  jj  Lechler  reads  "  very  devout ;"  c 
Alford,  "carrying  your  religious  reverence  very  far;**  and 
Albert  Barnes,  ft  "  I  perceive  ye  are  greatly  devoted  to  rever- 
ence for  religion"  %%  "Whoever,  therefore,  will  give  attention 
to  the  actual  words  of  the  Apostle,  and  search  for  their  real 
meaning,  must  be  convinced  he  opens  his  address  by  compli- 
menting the  Athenians  on  their  being  more  than  ordinarily 
religious. 

Nor  are  we  for  a  moment  to  suppose  the  Apostle  is  here 
dealing  in  hollow  compliments,  or  having  recourse  to  a  "pious 
fraud."  Snch  a  course  would  have  been  altogether  out  «.'l 
character  with  Paul,  and  to  suppose  him  capable  of  pursuing 
such  a  course  is  to  do  him  great  injustice.  If  "  to  the  Jewa 
he  became  as  a. Jew,"  it  was  because  he  recognized  in  Judaism 
the  same  fundamental  truths  which  underlie  the  Christian 
system.  And  if  here  he  seems  to  become,  in  any  sense,  as  one 
with  "  heathenism,"  that  he  might  gain  the  heathen  to  the 
faith  of  Christ,  it  was  because  he  found  in  heathenism  some 
elements  of  truth  akin  to  Christianity,  and  a  state  of  feeling 

*  Nitzsch,  "  System  of  Christ.  Doctriuo,"  p.  33.    f  Lange's  Commentary,  in  loco. 
(u  Guomon  of  the  New  Testament."  §  Intellectual  System,  vol.  i,  626. 

|  "Life  aud  Epistles  of  St.  Paul,"  vol.  i,  378.      %  Lange's  Commentary. 
**  Greek  Test.  ff  Notes  on.  Acts.  J}  Also  Clarke's  Comment 


IS69J  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  171 

i v..  ruble  to  an  inquiry  into  the  truths  he  had  to  present. 
!!<•  beheld  in  Athens  an  altar  reared  to  the  God  he  worshiped, 
and  it  afforded  him  some  pleasure  to  find  that  God  was  not 
totally  forgotten,  and  his  worship  totally  neglected,  by  the 
Athenians.  The  God  whom  they  knew  imperfectly,  ''Him," 
•aid  In:,  "  I  declare  unto  you  ;"  I  now  desire  to  make  him  more 
fully  known.  The  worship  of  "the  Unknown  God"  was  a 
;■  cognition  of  the  being  of  a  God  whose  nature  transcends  all 
i  tunas  thought,  a  God  who  is  ineffable  ;  who,  as  Plato  said, 
"  i*  hard  to  be  discovered,  and  having  discovered  him,  to 
make  him  known  to  all,  impossible."  *  It  is  the  confession 
of  a  want  of  knowledge,  the  expression  of  a  desire  to  know, 
the  acknowledgment  of  the  duty  of  worshiping  him.  Under- 
lying nil  the  forms  of  idol-worship  the  eye  of  Paul  recognized 
»:i  influential  Theism.  Deep  down  in  the  pagan  heart  he  dis- 
covered a  "feeling  after  God  "--a  yearning  for  a  deeper 
knowledge  of  the  "  unknown,"  the  invisible,  the  incompre- 
!.•■  liable,  which  he  could  not  despise  or  disregard.     The  mys- 

*  ri.>us  s(nti?nents  of  fear,  of  reverence,  of  conscious  dependence 

•  -i  a  supernatural  power  and  presence  overshadowing  man, 
which  were  expressed  in  the  symbolism  of  the  "  sacred  ob- 
jects" which  Paul  saw  every-where  in  Athens,  commanded 
his  respect.  And  he  alludes  to  their  ''devotions,"  not  in  the 
language  of  reproach  or  censure,  but  as  famishing  to  his  own 
mind  the  evidence  of  the  strength  of  their  religious  instincts, 
*i'd  the  proof  of  the  existence  in  their  hearts  of  that  native 

hension  of  the   supernatural,  the  divine,  which    dwells 
-:-ke  in  all  human  souls. 

1  he  case  of  the  Athenians  has,  therefore,  a  peculiar  interest 

I  •  fvrry  thoughtful  mind.     It  confirms  the  belief  that  religion 

u  a  necessity  to  every  human  mind,  a  want  of  every  human 

••irt.f    Without  religion,  the  nature  of  man  can  never  be 

properly  developed  ;  the  noblest  part  of  man — the  divine,  the 

tnal  element  which  dwells   in  man,  as  "the  offspring  of 

iut]    — must  remain  utterly  dwarfed.     The  spirit,  the  personal 

,,ngi  the  rational  nature,  is  religious,  and  Atheism  is  the  vain 

*  Timscua,  c.  ix. 

••■'  '"ilispensablc  necessity  for  a  religion  of  some  kind  to  satisfy  tho  emotional 
ir*  of  man  is  tacitly  confessed  by   the  Atheist  Cointe  in  the  publication  of 
"•  "Catechism  of  Positive  Religion."' 


172  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

and  the  wicked  attempt  to  be  something  less  than  man.  If 
the  spiritual  nature  of  man  has  its  normal  and  healthy  develop- 
ment, he  must  become  a  worshiper.  This  is  attested  by  the 
universal  history  of  man.  We  look  down  the  long-drawn 
aisles  of  antiquity,  and  every-where  we  behold  the  smoking 
altar,  the  ascending  incense,  the  prostrate  form,  the  attitude 
of  devotion.  Athens,  with  her  four  thousand  deities—  Rome, 
with  her  crowded  Pantheon  of  gods — Egypt,  with  her  degrading 
superstitions — Hindostan,  with  her  horrid  and  revolting  rites- 
all  attest  that  the  religious  principle  is  deeply  seated  in  the 
nature  of  man.  And  we  are  sure  religion  can  never  be  robbed 
of  her  supremacy,  she  can  never  be  dethroned  in  the  hearts  of 
men.  It  were  easier  to  satisfy  the  cravings  of  hunger  bv 
logical  syllogisms,  than  to  satisfy  the  yearnings  of  the  human 
heart  without  religion.  The  attempt  of  Xerxes  to  bind  the 
rushing  floods  of  the  Hellespont  in  chains  was  not  more  futile 
nor  more  impotent  than  the  attempt  of  skepticism  to  repress 
the  universal  tendency  to  worship,  so  peculiar  and  so  natural 
to  man  in  every  age  and  clime. 

The  unwillingness  of  many  to  recognize  a  religious  element 
in  the  Athenian  mind  is  further  accounted  for  by  their  mis- 
conception of  the  meaning  of  the  word  "  religion."  We  are 
all  too  much  accustomed  to  regard  religion  as  a  mere  system 
of  dogmatic  teaching.  We  use  the  terms  "  Christian  religion," 
"Jewish  religion,"  "  Mohammedan  religion,"  as  comprehend- 
ing simply  the  characteristic  doctrines  by  which  each  is  distin- 
guished ;  whereas  religion  is  a  mode  of  thought,  and  feeling, 
and  action,  determined  by  the  consciousness  of  our  relation  to 
and  our  dependence  upon  God.  It  docs  not  appropriate  to 
itself  any  specific  department  of  our  mental  powers  and  sus- 
ceptibilities, but  it  conditions  the  entire  functions  and  circle 
of  our  spiritual  life.  It  is  not  simply  a  mode  of  conceiving 
God  in  thought,  nor  simply  a  mode  of  venerating  God  in  the 
affections,  nor  yet  simply  a  mode  of  worshiping  God  in  out- 
ward and  formal  acts,  but  it  comprehends  the  whole.  Religion 
(religere,  respect,  awe,  reverence)  regulates  our  thoughts,  feel- 
ings, and  acts  toward  God.  "It  is  a  reference  and  a  relation- 
ship of  our  finite  consciousness  to  the  Creator  and  Snstainer 
and  Governor  of  the  universe."  It  is  such  a  consciousness  of 
the  Divine  as  shall  awaken  in  the.  heart  of  man  the  sentiments 


\>.,Vt),]  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  173 

,  f  reverence,  fear,  and  gratitude  toward  God  ;  such  a  sense  of 
dependence  as  shall  prompt  man  to  pray,  and  lead  him  to  per- 
•'  rm  external  acts  of  worship. 

lleligion  does  not,  therefore,  consist  exclusively  in  knowl- 
..L-e,  however  correct;  and  yet  it  must  be  preceded  and 
accompanied  by  some  intuitive  cognition  of  a  Supreme  Being, 
an<!  some  conception  of  him  as  a  free  moral  Personality.  But 
the  religious  sentiments  which  belong  rather  to  the  heart  than 
\u  tlie  understanding  of  man — the  consciousness  of  dependence, 
the  sense  of  obligation,  the  feeling  of  reverence,  the  instinct  to 
;  ray,  the  appetency  to  worship — these  may  all  exist  and  be 
largely  developed  in  a  human  mind  even  when,  as  in  the  case 
of  the  Athenians,  there  is  a  very  imperfect  knowledge  of  the 
real  character  of  God. 

Regarding  this,  then,  as  the  generic  conception  of  religion, 
namely,  that  it  is  a  mode  of  thought  and  feeling  and  action 
d<  .'<  nnined  ly  our  consciousness  of  dependence  on  a  Supreme 
/>■  ing,  we  claim  that  the  Apostle  was  perfectly  right  in  com- 
|>limenting  the  Athenians  on  their  "more  than  ordinary  relig- 
iousness," for, 

1.  They  had,  in  some  degree  at  least,  that  faith  in  the  being 
and  providence  of  God  which  precedes  and  accompanies  all 
religion. 

They  had  erected  an  altar  to  the  unseen,  the  unsearchable, 
ike  incomprehensible,  the  unknown  God.  And  tins  "  un- 
known God"  whom  the  Athenians  "worshiped"  was  the  true 
God,  the  God  whom  Paul  worshiped,  and  whom  he  desired 
fiorc  fully  to  reveal  to  them;  uBzm  declare  I  unto  you." 
I  he  Athenians  had,  therefore,  some  knowledge  of  the  true 
God,  some  dim  recognition,  at  least,  of  his  being,  and  some 
'  !1,-q>tion,  however  imperfect,  of  his  character.  The  Deity 
w  whom  the  Athenians  reared  this  altar  is  called  "the  un- 
known God,"  because  he  is  unseen  by  all  human  eyes  and  in- 
comprehensible to  human  thought.     There  is  a  sense  in  which 

Paul,  as  well  as  to  the  Athenians — to  the  Christian  as  well 

to  the  pagan — to  the  philosopher  as  well  as  to  the  peasant— 
"-'u  js  "  the  unknown"  and  in  which  he  must  for  ever  remain 
J)  "  incomprehensible.  This  has  been  confessed  by  all  thought- 
'■J  ni'nds  in  every  age.  It  was  confessed  by  Plato.  To  his 
■Bind  God  is  "  the  ineffable,"  the  unspeakable.     Zophar,  the 


174  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [Aprils 

friend  of  Job,  asks,  "  Canst  thou  by  searching  find  out  God  \ 
Canst  thou  find  out  the  Almighty  to  perfection  ?  This  knowl- 
edge is  "  high  as  heaven  ;  what  canst  thou  do  ?  deeper  than  hell : 
•what  canst  thou  know  \  "     Does  not  Wesley  teach  us  to  sing, 

Hail,  Father,  whose  creating  call 

Unnumbered  -worlds  attend ; 
Jehovah,  comprehending  all, 

Whom  none  can  comprehend. 

To  his  mind,  as  well  as  to  the  mind  of  the  Athenian,  God 
was  "  the  great  unseen,  unknown."  "  Beyond  the  universe  and 
man,"  says  Cousin,  "  there  remains  in  God  something  un- 
known, impenetrable,  incomprehensible.  Hence,  in  the  im- 
measurable spaces  of  the  universe,  and  beneath  all  the  pro- 
fundities of  the  human  soul,  God  escapes  us  in  this  inexhausti- 
ble infinitude,  whence  he  is  able  to  draw  without  limit  new 
worlds,  new  beings,  new  manifestations.  God  is  therefore  to 
us  incomprehensible.''''  *  And  without  making  ourselves  in  the 
least  responsible  for  Hamilton's  "  negative "  doctrine  of  the 
Infinite,  or  even  responsible  for  the  full  import  of  his  words, 
we  may  quote  his  remarkable  utterances  on  this  subject :  "  The 
Divinity  is  in  part  concealed  and  in  part  revealed.  He  is  at 
once  known  and  unknown.  But  the  last  and  highest  conse- 
cration of  all  true  religion  must  be  an  altar  '  to  the  unknown 
God.'  In  this  consummation  nature  and  religion,  Paganism 
and  Christianity,  are  at  one."  f 

When,  therefore,  the  Apostle  affirms  that  while  the  Athenians 
worshiped  the  God  whom  he  proclaimed  they  "  knew  him  not," 
we  cannot  understand  him  as  saying  they  were  destitute  of 
all  faith  in  the  being  of  God,  and  of  all  ideas  of  his  real  char- 
acter. Because  for  him  to  have  asserted  they  had  no  knowl- 
edge of  God  would  not  only  have  been  contrary  to  all  the  facts 
of  the  case,  but  also  an  utter  contradiction  of  all  his  settled 
convictions  and  his  recorded  opinions.  There  is  not  in  modem 
times  a  more  earnest  assertor  of  the  doctrine  that  the  human 
mind  has  an  intuitive  cognition  of  God,  and  that  the  external 
world  reveals  God  to  man.  There  is  a  passage  in  his  letter  to 
the  Romans  which  is  justly  entitled  to  stand  at  the  head  of  all 
discourses  on  ''natural  theology."  Rom.  i,  19-21.  Speaking  of 
"Lectures,  vol  i,  p.  104.  \  "Discussions  on  Philosophy,"  p.  23. 


]  $60j  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  175 

:!...•  heathen  world,  who  had  not  been  favored,  as  the  Jews, 
v  iili  a  verbal  revelation,  he  says,  "  That  which  may  be 
known  of  God  is  manifest  in  them,"  that  is,  in  the  con- 
ititution  and  laws  of  their  spiritual  nature,  "for  God  hath 
ihowed  it  unto  them  "  in  the  voice  of  reason  and  of  con- 
nee,  so  that  in  the  instincts  of  our  hearts,  in  the  elements 
•  our  moral  nature,  in  the  ideas  and  laws  of  our  reason,  we 
ht\*  taught  the  being  of  a  God.  These  are  the  subjective 
teachings  of  the  human  soul. 

Not  only  is  the  being  of  God  revealed  to  man  in  the  consti- 
tution and  laws  of  his  rational  and  moral  nature,  but  God  is 
ftiso  manifested  to  us  objectively  in  the  realm  of  things  around 
\i- ;  therefore  Paul  adds,  "The  invisible  things  of  him,  even 
1* i r*  eternal  power  and  Godhead,  from  the  creation  are  clearly 
leen,  being  understood  by  the  things  that  are  made."  The 
world  of  sense,  therefore,  discloses  the  being  and  perfections  of 
God.  The  invisible  attributes  of  God  are  made  apparent  by 
the  things  that  are  visible.  Forth  out  of  nature,  as  the  prod- 
uct of  the  Divine  Mind,  the  supernatural  shines.  The  forces, 
laws,  and  harmonies  of  the  universe  are  indices  of  the  pres- 
<  nee  of  a  presiding  and  informing  Intelligence.  The  creation 
it»elf  is  an  example  of  God's  coining  forth  out  of  the  mys- 
terious depths  of  his  own  eternal  and  invisible  being,  and 
making  himself  apparent  to  man.  There,  on  the  pages  of  the 
'  lame  of  nature,  we  may  read,  in  the  marvelous  language  of 
tymbol,  the  grand  conceptions,  the  glorious  thoughts,  the 
ideals  of  beauty,  which  dwell  in  the  uncreated  Mind.  These 
Iwo  sources  of  knowledge,  the  subjective  teachings  of  God  in 
l«c  human  soul,  and  the  objective  manifestations  of  God  in 
'•■•■  visible  universe  harmonize,  and,  together,  fill  up  the  com- 
|>'cment  of  bur  natural  idea  of  God.  They  are  two  hemispheres 
ol  thought,  which  together  form  one  full-orbed  fountain  of 
"ght,  and  ought  never  to  be  separated  in  our  philosophy. 
And,  inasmuch  as  this  divine  light  shines  on  all  human  minds, 
M»d  these  works  of  God  are  seen  by  all  human  eyes,  the  Apostle 
Wgues  that  the  heathen  world  "  is  without  excuse,  because 
Knowing  God  (yvovreg  TovQeov)  they  did  not  glorify  him  as  God, 
neither  were  thankful ;  but  in  their  reasonings  they  went  astray 
h::' -r  vanities,  and  their  hearts,  being  void  of  wisdom,  were 
"•led   with  darkness.      Calling   themselves   wise,  they  were 


176  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

turned  into  fools,  and  changed  the  glory  of  the  imperishable 
God  for  idols  graven  in  the  likeness  of  perishable  man,  or  of 
birds,  and  beasts,  and  creeping  things,  .  .  .  and  they  bartered 
the  truth  of  God  for  lies,  and  reverenced  and  worshiped  the 
things  made  rather  than  the  Maker,  who  is  blessed  for  ever. 
Amen."  * 

The  brief  and  elliptical  report  of  Paul's  address  on  Mars' 
Hill  must  therefore,  in  all  fairness,  be  interpreted  in  the  light 
of  his  more  carefully  elaborated  statements  in  the  Epistle  to 
the  Romans.  And  when  Paul  intimates  that  the  Athenians 
"  knew  not  God,"  we  cannot  understand  him  as  saving  they 
had  no  knowledge,  but  that  their  knowledge  was  imperfect. 
They  did  not  know  God  as  Creator,  Father,  and  Ruler;  above 
all,  they  did  not  know  him  as  a  pardoning  God,  and  a  sancti- 
fying Spirit.  They  had  not  that  knowledge  of  God  which 
purifies  the  heart,  and  changes  the  character,  and  gives  its 
possessor  eternal  life. 

The  Apostle  clearly  and  unequivocally  recognizes  this  truth, 
that  the  idea  of  God  is  connatural  to  the  human  mind  ;  that 
in  fact  there  is  not  to  be  found  a  race  of  men  upon  the  face 
of  the  globe  utterly  destitute  of  some  idea  of  a  Supreme 
Being.  Wherever  human  reason  has  had  its  normal  and 
healthful  development  it  has  spontaneously  and  necessarily  led 
the  human  mind  to  the  recognition  of  a  God.  The  Athe- 
nians were  no  exception  to  this  general  law.  They  believed  in 
the  existeucc  of  one  supreme  and  eternal  Mind,  invisible,  in- 
comprehensible, ineffable — "  the  unknown  God." 

2.  The  Athenians  had  also  that  consciousness  of  dependence 
upon  God  which  is  the  foundation  of  all  the  primary  religious 
emotions. 

"When  the  Apostle  affirmed  that  "  in  God  we  live,  and  move, 
and  have  our  being,"  he  uttered  the  sentiments  of  many,  it* 
not  all,  of  his  hearers,  and  in  support  of  that  affirmation  he 
could  quote  the  words  of  their  own  poets,  "  for  we  are  also  his 
offspring ;"  f   and  as  his  offspring  we  have  a  derived  and  a 

♦Rom.  i,  21-25.     Couybcare  and  Howsou's  translation. 
f  "Jove's  presence  fills  all  space,  upholds  this  ball; 
All  need  his  aid  ;  his  power  sustains  us  all, 

Foi-  we  his  offspring  are." — Aratus:  "The  Phenomena,"  Book  V,  5. 
Aratus  was  a  poet  of  Cilicia,  Paul's  native  province.     He  flourished  B.  C.  277. 


;-.;•».]  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  177 

ndent  being.  Indeed,  this  consciousness  of  dependence  is 
a;.:;!ugous  to  the  feeling  which  is  awakened  in  the  heart  of  a 
child  when  its  parent  is  first  manifested  to  its  opening  mind  as 
lb«  giver  of  those  tilings  which  it  immediately  needs,  as  its 
rontinual  protector,  and  as  the  preserver  of  its  life.  The 
:  .»;ncnt  a  man  becomes  conscious  of  his  own  personality, 
•."..:  moment  he  becomes  conscious  of  some  relation  to  an- 
other  personality,  to  which  he  is  subject,  and  on  which  he 
depends,  f 

A  little  reflection  will  convince  us  that  this  is  the  necessary 
rder  in  which  human  consciousness  is  developed. 

There  are  at  least  two  fundamental  and  radical  tendencies 
in  human  personality,  namely,  to  know  and  to  act.  If  we 
would  conceive  of  them  as  they  exist  in  the  innermost  sphere 
i  f  self-hood,  we  must  distinguish  the  first  as  self -consciousness, 
fc-:j<l  the  second  as  self-determination.  These  are  unquestion- 
ably the  two  factors  of  human  personality. 

If  we  consider  the  first  of  these  factors  more  closely,  we 


"  Great  and  divine  Father,  whose  names  are  many, 
But  who  art  one  and  the  same  unchangeable,  almighty  power; 
0  thou  supreme  Author  of  nature  I 
That  goveruest  by  a  single  unerring  law  I 
Hail  King  I 
For  mou  art  able  to  enforce  obedience  from  all  frail  mortals, 
Because  we  arc  all  thine  offspring, 
The  image  and  the  echo  only  of  thy  eternal  voice." 

Cleanthes:   "Hymn  to  Jupiter." 

(Vtottafl  was  the  pupil  of  Zeno,  and  his  successor  as  chief  of  the  Stoic  phi- 
>w-  i-iiors. 

'  As  soon  as  a  man  becomes  conscious  of  himself,  as  soon  as  he  perceives  him- 

m  h*  distinct  from  other  persons  and  things,  ho  at  the  same  moment  becomes 

•"'•*»  of  a  higher  Self,  a  higher  power,  without  which  ho  feels  that  neither  he 

"  "  1:'V  thing  else  would  have  any  life  or  reality.     We  are  so  fashioned  that  as 

■  hi  wo  awake  we  feel  on  all  sides  our  dependence  on  something  else;  and  all 

•>  j^in  in  Eome  way  or  another  in  the  words  of  the  Psalmist,,  'It  is  He  that 

•"  us,  not  we  ourselves.'     Thi3  is  the  first  sense  of  the  Godhead,  tho  sensv-s  nu- 

"■  fts  it  has  well  been  called;  for  it  is  a  sensus,  an  immediate  perception,  not 

''  Wit  of  reasoning  or  generalization,  but  an  iutuition  as  irresistible  as  the  im- 

"**1  of  our  senses.  .  .  .  This  sensus  numinis,  or,  as  wo  may  call  it  in  more 

■>'  "ngunge,  faith,  is  the  source  of  all  religion;  it  is  that  without  which  no 

Poo,  whether  truo  or  false,    is   possible."— Max   Mullcr:    "Science   of  Lan- 

r -**<•,"  Socoud  Series,  p.  455. 


178  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

shall  discover  that  self-consciousness  exists  under  limitations 
and  conditions.  Man  cannot  become  clearly  conscious  of 
self  without  distinguishing  himself  from  the  outer  world  of 
sensation,  nor  without  distinguishing  self  and  the  world  from 
another  being  upon  whom  they  depend  as  the  ultimate  sub- 
stance and  cause.  Mere  sensus  communis  is  not  consciousness 
Common  feeling  is  unquestionably  found  among  the  lowest 
forms  of  animal  life,  the  protozoa,  but  it  can  never  rise  to  a 
clear  consciousness  of  personality  until  it  can  distinguish  itself 
from  sensation,  and  acquire  a  presentiment  of  a  divine  power, 
on  which  self  and  the  outer  world  depend.  The  Ego  does  not 
exist  for  itself,  cannot  perceive  itself,  but  by  distinguishing 
itself  from  the  ceaseless  flow  and  change  of  sensation,  and  by 
this  act  of  distinguishing,  the  Ego  takes  place  in  consciousness. 
And  the  Ego  cannot  perceive  itself,  nor  cognize  sensation  as 
a  state  or  affection  of  the  Ego  except  by  the  intervention  of 
the  reason,  which  supplies  the  two  great  fundamental  laws  of 
causality  and  substance.  The  facts  of  consciousness  thus  com- 
prehend three  elements — self,  nature,  and  God.  The  deter- 
minate being,  the  Ego,  is  never  an  absolutely  independent 
being,  but  is  always  in  someway  or  other  codetermined,  by 
another ;  it  cannot,  therefore,  be  an  absolutely  original  and 
independent,  but  must  in  some  way  or  another  be  a  derived 
and  conditioned  existence. 

Now  that  which  limits  and  conditions  human  self-conscious- 
ness cannot  be  mere  nature,  because  nature  cannot  give  what 
it  does  not  possess ;  it  cannot  produce  what  is  toto  genere  dif- 
ferent from  itself.  Self-consciousness  cannot  arise  out  of  un- 
consciousness. This  new  beginning  is  beyond  the  power  of 
nature.  Personal  power,  the  creative  principle  of  all  new 
beginnings,  is  alone  adequate  to  its  production.  If,  then,  self- 
consciousness  exists  in  man  it  necessarily  presupposes  an  abso- 
lutely original,  therefore  unconditioned,  self-conscious m  %9. 
Human  self-consciousness,  in  its  temporal  actualization,  of 
course  presupposes  a  nature-basis  upon  which  it  elevates  itself; 
but  it  is  only  possible  on  the  ground  that  an  eternal  self-con- 
scious Mind  ordained  and  rules  over  all  the  processes  of  nature, 
and  implants  the  divine  spark  of  the  personal  spirit  with  the 
corporeal  frame,  to  realize  itself  in  the  light-flame  of  human 
self-consciousness.     The  original  light  of  the  divine  self-cun- 


1S09.1  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  179 

Fciousness  is  eternally  and  absolutely  first  and  before  all. 
"  Thus  in  the  depths  of  our  own  self-consciousness,  as  its  con- 
cealed background,  the  God-consciousness  reveals  itself  to  us. 
This  descent  into  our  inmost  being  is  at  the  same  time  an 
ascent  to  God.  Every  deep  reflection  on  ourselves  breaks 
through  the  mere  crust  of  world-consciousness,  which  separates 
us  from  the  inmost,  truth  of  our  existence,  and  leads  us  up  to 
Ilirn  in  whom  we  live  and  move  and  are."  * 

Self-determination,  equally  with  self-consciousness,  exists  in 
us  under  manifold  limitations.  Self-determination  is  limited 
by  physical,  corporeal,  and  mental  conditions,  so  that  there  is 
"an  impassable  boundary  line  drawn  around  the  area  of  voli- 
tional freedom."  But  the  most  fundamental  and  original 
limitation  is  that  of  duty.  The  self-determining  power  of 
man  is  not  only  circumscribed  by  necessary  conditions,  but 
also  by  the  moral  law  in  the  consciousness  of  man.  Self-de- 
termination alone  does  not  suffice  for  the  full  conception  of 
responsible  freedom  ;  it  only  becomes  properly  will  by  its 
being  an  intelligent  and  conscious  determination  ;  that  is,  the 
rational  subject  is  able  previously  to  recognize  "the  right," 
and  present  before  his  mind  that  which  he  ought  to  do,  that 
which  he  is  morally  bound  to  realize  and  actualize  by  his  own 
self-determination  and  choice.  Accordingly  we  find  in  our 
inmost  being  a  sense  of  obligation  to  obey  the  moral  law  as 
revealed  in  the  conscience.  As  we  cannot  become  conscious 
of  self  without  also  becoming  conscious  of  God,  so  we  cannot 
become  properly  conscious  of  self-determination  until  we  have 
recognized  in  the  conscience  a  law  for  the  movements  of  the 
will. 

Now  this  moral  law,  as  revealed  in  the  conscience,  is  not  a 
niere  autonomy — a  simple  subjective  law  having  no  relation  to 
a  personal  lawgiver  out  of  and  above  man.  Every  admonition 
of  conscience  directly  excites  the  consciousness  of  a  God  to 
whom  man  is  accountable.  The  universal  consciousness  of  our 
race,  as  revealed  in  history,  has  always  associated  the  phe- 
nomena of  conscience  with  the  idea  of  a  personal  Power  above 
man,  to  whom  he  is  subject  and  upon  whom  he  depends.  In 
every  age,  the  voice  of  conscience  has  been  regarded  as  the 
voice  of  God,  so  that  when  it  has  filled  man  with  guilty  appre- 

*  Muller,  "Christian  Doctrine  of  Sin,"  vol.  i,  p.  81. 


180  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

hensions  lie  has  had  recourse  to  sacrifices,  and  penances,  arid 
prayers  to  expiate  his  wrath. 

It  is  clear,  then,  that  if  man  has  duties  there  must  be  a  self- 
conscious  Will  by  whom  these  duties  are  imposed,  for  only  a 
real  will  can  be  legislative.  If  man  has  a  sense  of  obligation, 
there  must  be  a  supreme  authority  by  which  he  is  obiiged.  If 
he  is  responsible,  there  must  be  a  being  to  whom  he  is  account- 
able.* It  cannot  be  said  that  he  is  accountable  to  himself,  for 
by  that  supposition  the  idea  of  duty  is  obliterated,  and  "right" 
becomes  identical  with  mere  interest  or  pleasure.  It  cannot 
be  said  that  he  is  simply  responsible  to  society — to  mere  con- 
ventions of  human  opinions  and  human  governments — for  then 
"right"  becomes  a  mere  creature  of  human  legislation,  and 
"justice"  is  nothing  but  the  arbitrary  will  of  the  strong  who 
tyrannize  over  the  weak.  Might  constitutes  right.  Against 
such  hypotheses  the  human  mind,  however,  instinctively  revolts. 
Mankind  feel,  universally,  that  there  is  an  authority  beyond  all 
human  governments,  and  a  higher  law  above  all  human  laws, 
from  whence  all  their  powers  are  derived.  That  higher  law  is 
the  Law  of  God,  that  supreme  authority  is  the  God  of  Justice. 
To  this  eternally  just  God,  innocence,  under  oppression  and 
wrong,  has  made  its  proud  appeal,  like  that  of  Prometheus  to 
the  elements,  to  the  witnessing  clouds,  to  coming  ages,  and 
has  been  sustained  and  comforted.  And  to  that  higher  law 
the  weak  have  confidently  appealed  against  the  unrighteous 
enactments  of  the  strong,  and  have  finally  conquered.  The 
last  and  inmost  ground  of  all  obligation  is  thus  the  conscious 
relation  of  the  moral  creature  to  God.  The  sense  of  absolute 
dependence  upon  a  Supreme  Being  compels  man,  even  while 
conscious  of  subjective  freedom,  to  recognize  at  the  same  time 
his  obligation  to  determine  himself  in  harmony  with  the  will 
of  Him  "  in  whom  we  live,  and  move,  and  are." 

This  feeling  of  dependence,  and  this  consequent  sense  of  obli- 
gation, lie  at  the  very  foundation  of  all  religion.  They  lead 
the  mind  toward  God,  and  anchor  it  in  the  Divine.  They 
prompt  man  to  pray,  and  inspire  him  with  an  instinctive  con- 
fidence in  the  eificacy  of  prayer.  So  that  prayer  is  natural  to 
man,  and  necessary  to  man.    Kever  yet  has  the  traveler  found 

*  "The  thought  of  God  will  wake  up  a  terrible  monitor  whose  name  is  Judge." — 
Kant. 


1869.3  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  181 

a  people  on  earth  without  prayer.  Eaces  of  men  have  been 
found  without  houses,  without  raiment,  without  arts  and  sci- 
ences, but  never  without  prayer  any  more  than  without  speech. 
Plutarch  wrote,  eighteen  centuries  ago,  "If  you  go  through  all 
the  world,  you  may  find  cities  without  walls,  without  letters, 
without  rulers,  without  money,  without  theaters,  but  never 
without  temples  and  gods,  or  without  prayers,  oaths,  prophe- 
cies, and  sacrifices,  used  to  obtain  blessings  and  benefits,  or  to 
avert  curses  and  calamities.*  The  naturalness  of  prayer  is  ad- 
mitted even  by  the  modern  unbeliever.  Gerrit  Smith  says, 
"  Let  us  who  believe  that  the  religion  of  reason  calls  for  the 
religion  of  nature,  remember  that  the  flow  of  prayer  is  just  as 
natural  as  the  flow  of  water ;  the  prayerless  man  has  become 
an  unnatural  man."t  Is  man  in  sorrow  or  in  danger,  his  most 
natural  and  spontaneous  refuge  is 'in  prayer.  The  suffering, 
bewildered,  terror-stricken  soul  turns  toward  God.  "  Nature 
in  an  a°-ony  is  no  atheist;  the  soul  that  knows  not  where  to  fly, 
flies  to  God."  And  in  the  hour  of  deliverance  and  joy,  a  feel- 
ing of  gratitude  pervades  the  soul— and  gratitude,  too,  not  to 
some  blind  nature-force,  to  some  unconscious  and  impersonal 
power,  but  gratitude  to  God.  The  soul's  natural  and  appro- 
priate language  in  the  hour  of  deliverance  is  thanksgiving  and 
praise. 

This  universal  tendency  to  recognize  a  superior  Power  upon 
whom  we  are  dependent,  and  by  whose  hand  our  well-being 
and  our  destinies  are  absolutely  controlled,  has  revealed  itself 
even  amid  the  most  complicated  forms  of  poly  theistic  worship. 
Amid  the  even  and  undisturbed  flow  of  every-day  life  they 
might  be  satisfied  with  the  worship  of  subordinate  deities,  but 
in  the  midst  of  sudden  and  unexpected  calamities,  and  of  ter- 
rible catastrophes,  then  they  cried  to  the  Supreme  God.^ 
"  When  alarmed  by  an  earthquake,"  says  Aulus  Gellins,  "  the 
ancient  Romans  were  accustomed  to  pray,  not  to  some  one 
of  the  gods  individually,  but  to  God  in  general,  as  to  the 
Unknown." '§ 
*  "  Against  Kalotes,"  c.  xxxl  t  "  legion  of  Reason." 

\  "  At  critical  moments,  when  the  deepest  feelings  of  the  human  heart  are  stirred, 
the  old  Greeks  and  Romans  seem  suddenly  to  have  dropped  all  mythological  ideas, 
and  to  have  fallen  back  on  the  universal  languago  of  truo  roligioa."— Mai  Muller, 
"Science  of  Language,"  p.  436. 
§  Tholuck,  "  Nature  and  Influence  of  Ileathenism,"  p.  23. 

Fourth  Sekies,  Vol.  XXI.— 12 


182  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

"  Thus  also  Minutius  Felix  says,  'When  they  stretch  out  their 
hands  to  heaven  they  mention  only  God ;  and  these  forms  of 
speech,  He  is  great,  and  God  is  true,  and  If  God  grant,  (which 
are  the  natural  language  of  the  vulgar,)  are  a  plain  confession 
of  the  truth  of  Christianity.'  And  also  Lactantius  testifies, 
'  When  they  swear,  and  when  they  wish,  and  when  they  give 
thanks,  they  name  not  many  gods,  but  God  only;  the  truth, 
by  a  secret  force  of  nature,  thus  breaking  forth  from  them 
whether  they  will  or  no;'  and  again  he  says,  'They  fly  to 
God ;  aid  is  desired  of  God ;  they  pray  that  God  would  help 
them ;  and  when  one  is  reduced  to  extreme  necessity,  he  begs 
for  God's  sake,  and  by  his  divine  power  alone  implores  the 
mercy  of  men.'  "  *  The  account  which  is  given  by  Diogenes 
Laertiusf  of  the  erection  of  altars  bearing  the  inscription  "to 
the  unknown  God,"  clearly  shows  that  they  had  their  origin 
in  this  general  sentiment  of  dependence  on  a  higher  Power. 
"  The  Athenians  being  afflicted  with  pestilence  invited  Epi- 
menides  to  lustrate  their  city.  The  method  adopted  by  him 
was  to  carry  several  sheep  to  the  Areopagus,  whence  they  were 
left  to  wander  as  they  pleased,  under  the  observation  of  per- 
sons sent  to  attend  them.  As  each  sheep  lay  down  it  was  sac- 
rificed to  the  2^ropitious  God.  By  this  ceremony  it  is  said  the 
city  was  relieved ;  but  as  it  was  still  unknown  what  deity  was 
propitious,  an  altar  was  erected  to  the  unknown  God  on  every 
spot  where  a  sheep  had  been  sacrificed."  \ 

"  The  unknown  God  "  was  their  deliverer  from  the  plague. 
And  the  erection  of  an  altar  to  him  was  a  confession  of  their 
absolute  dependence  upon  him,  of  their  obligation  to  worship 
him,  as  well  as  of  their  need  of  a  deeper  knowledge  of  him. 
The  gods  who  were  known  and  named  were  not  able  to  deliver 
them  in  times  of  calamity,  and  they  were  compelled  to  look 
beyond  the  existing  forms  of  Grecian  mythology  for  relief. 
Beyond  all  the  gods  of  the  Olympus  there  was  "  one  God  over 
all,"  the  Father  of  gods  and  men,  the  Creator  of  all  the  sub- 
ordinate local  deities,  upon  whom  even  these  created  gods 
were  dependent,  upon  whom  man  was  absolutely  dependent, 
and  .therefore  in  times  of  deepest  need,  of  severest  suffering,  of 

*  Cudworth,  vol.  i,  p.  300.        f  "Lives  of  Philosophers,"  Book  I,  Epimenides. 
J  See  Townseud's  "Chronological  Arrangement  of  Now  Testament,"  note  19, 
part  xii;  Doddridgo's  "  Exposition;"  and  Barnes's  "Notes  on  Acts." 


1S6W  JMi.jwn  of  the  Athenians.  183 

extivnu-:-!  pwU,  thou  they  cried  to  the  living,  supreme,  eternal 
God.  * 

3,  I  ho  Athenian*  developed  in  a  high  degree  those  religious 
emotions  \\  hioh  alwayti  accompany  the  consciousness  of depend- 
ency on  i\  Sup\xMuo  Ncmg. 

The  ttr»1  Miuttumnl  clement  of  all  religion  is /ear.  This  is  ' 
muniestfonal^v  (,uo  whether  religion  be  considered  from  a 
Christian  or  *  heathen  stand-point.  "  The  fear  of  the  Lord  is 
tho  beginning  ot'  wisdom."  Associated  with,  perhaps  preced- 
ing, all  definite  ideas  of  God,  there  exists  in  the  human  mind 
certain  toolm^-*  of  ,?j,v,  and  reverence,  and  fear  which  arise 
spontaneous  («  tnvscnec  of  the  vastness,  and  grandeur,  and 
niaguUuvnoo  of  tho  universe,  and  of  the  power  and  glory  of 
which  tfw  evvatod  universe  is  but  the  symbol  and  shadow. 
There  is  the  &\\  ^>p,vhension  that,  beyond  and  back  of  the 
visible  and  tho  tangible,  there  is  ^.personal,  living  Power,  which 
ifi  the  ftMuuUttai  of  nil,  and  which  fashions  all,  and  fills  all 
with  its  ti-ht  >;Uv>  j;.;o,  t|mt  u  t^Q  universe  is  the  living  vesture 
"J  w^Wl  \h.o  ln\U\Mo  has  robed  his  mysterious  loveliness." 
lliere  is  iho  iVeUn^  of  an  overshadowing  Presence  which  "  eom- 
passetH  man  Ivouul  and  before,  and  lays  its  hand  upon  him."' 

-Men  vo,av  eonteve,\\Ute  nature  from  different  points  of  view. 
bomo  u>;i\  »v  vovewvvsod  with  one  aspect  of  nature,  some  with 
another,  Uui  uev,e  will  fail  to  recognize  a  mysterious  pres- 
m&  and  inw^Ve  jvtfty  beneath  all  the  fleeting  and  changeful 
phenomena  ot'  »s0  nniverse.  "And  sometimes  there  are  mo- 
ments ot  toudew.osss^  of  sorrow,  and  of  vague  mystery  which 
bring  the  teeatyj  ef  iho,  Infinite  Presence  close  to  the  human 
hearth  I 

-Now  we  heM  &at  >•)«?,«  feeling  and  sentiment  of  the  Divine 
7"  *tty***MW»J  sexists  in  every  mind.  It  maybe,  it  un- 
doubuv.A  ■>.  *e^vw^;  modified  in  its  manifestations  by  the 

r  (      v  '''v"v  ***  *V*i  *»  <VN  th«?  Iliad  and  Odyssey  are  habitually  religious.     The 

8  Wg*  c.  >v .-.    ...    w    ^ ^   ^  Q^fa  t0DgueSi  as  it  is  ever  on  the  lips  of  even' 

(  ;V  l"  '  '    :  ' '     ■      '  *  -  •  •.•      TN»  thought  of  the  gods,  aud  of  their  providence  and 

uufcftK  -v   -v  %v<&&    ,x  *  familiar  thought.     They  seem  to  have  an  abiding 

th        »«*"*'  *   '  N':    "-^^•'■''•v  on  the  gods.     The  results  of  all  actions  depend  on 

oftn       *  <J  ■  "S  VS     *   ~"v  ,1*'  *****  knees  (Oeuv  ev  yavvaat  kcItoi,  Od-,  i,  2G7)  is  the 

"Tk      *'*****  v*       ~^'  ■  expression  of  their  fueling  of  dependence." — Tyler, 


1S4-  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

circumstances  in  which  men   are  placed,  and  the  degree  of 
culture  they  have  enjoyed.    The  African  Fetischist,  in  his  moral 
and  intellectual  debasement,  conceives  a  supernatural  power 
enshrined  in  every  object  of  nature.     The  rude  Fijian  regards 
with  dread,  and  even  terror,  the  Being  who  darts  the  lightnings 
and  wields  the  thunderbolts.     The  Indian  "  sees  God  in  clouds 
and  hears  him  in  the  wind."     The  Scottish  "herdsman"  on 
the  lonely  mountain-top  "feels  the  presence  and  the  power 
of  greatness,"  and  "  in  its  fixed  and  steady  lineaments  he  sees 
an  ebbing  and  a  flowing  mind."     The  philosopher  *  lifts  his 
eyes  to  "  the  starry  heavens  "  in  all  the  depth  of  their  concave, 
and  with  all  their  constellations  of  glory  moving  on  in  solemn 
grandeur,  and,  to  his  mind,  these  immeasurable  regions  seem 
"  filled  with  the  splendors  of  the  Deity,  and  crowded  with  the 
monuments  of  his  power ; "  or  he  turns  his  eye  to  "  the  Moral 
Law  within,"  and  he  hears  the  voice  of  an  intelligent  and  a 
righteous  God.     In  all  these  cases  we  have  a  revelation  of  the 
sentiment  of  the  Divine,  which   dwells   alike   in   all   human 
minds.     In  the  Athenians  this  sentiment  was  developed  in  a 
high  degree.     The  serene  heaven  which  Greece  enjoyed,  and 
which  was  the  best-loved  roof  of  its  inhabitants,  the  brilliant 
sun,  the  mountain  scenery  of  unsurpassed  grandeur,  the  deep 
blue  sea,  an  image  of  the  infinite,  these  poured  all  their  full- 
ness on  the  Athenian  mind,  and  furnished  the  most  favorable 
conditions  for  the  development  of  the  religious   sentiments. 
The  people  of  Athens  spent  most  of  their  time  in  the  open  air 
in  communion  with  nature,  and  in  the  cheerful  and  temperate 
enjoyment  of  existence.     To  recognize  the  Deity  in  the  living 
powers  of  nature,  and  especially  in  man,  as  the  highest  sensible 
manifestation  of  the  Divine,  was  the  peculiar  prerogative  of 
the  Grecian  mind.     And  here  in  Athens,  art  also  vied  with 
nature  to  deepen  the  religious  sentiments.     It  raised  the  mind 
to  ideal  conceptions  of  a  beauty  and  a  sublimity  which  tran- 
scended all  mere  nature-forms,  and  by  images  of  supernatural 
grandeur  and  loveliness  presented  to  the  Athenians  symbolic 
representations  of  the  separate  attributes  aud  operations  of  the 
invisible  God.     The  plastic  art  of  Greece  was  designed  to  ex- 
press religious  ideas,  and  was  consecrated  by  religious  feeling. 
Thus  the  facts  of  the  case  are  strikingly  in  hannony  with  the 
♦Kant  in  "Critiquo  of  Practical  Reason." 


1SC9J  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  185 

words  of  the  Apostle  :  "All  things  which  I  behold  bear  witness 
to  jour  carefulness  in  religion,"  your  "reverence  for  the 
Deity,"  your  "  fear  of  God."  *  "  The  sacred  objects "  in 
Athens,  and  especially  "  the  altar  to  the  unknown  God,"  were 
all  regarded  by  Paul  as  evidences  of  their  instinctive  faith  in 
the  invisible,  the  supernatural,  the  divine. 

Along  with  this  sentiment  of  the  Divine  there  is  also  associ- 
ated, in  all  human  minds,  an  imtinctive  yearning  after  the 
Invisible ;  not  a  mere  feeling  of  curiosity  to  pierce  the  mystery 
of  being  and  of  life,  but  what  Paul  designates  "  a  feeling  after 
God,"  which  prompts  man  to  seek  after  a  deeper  knowledge, 
and  a  more  immediate  consciousness.  To  attain  this  deeper 
knowledge,  this  more  conscious  realization  of  the  being  and 
the  presence  of  God,  has  been  the  effort  of  all  philosophy  and 
all  religion  in  all  ages.  The  Hindoo  Yogis  proposes  to  with- 
draw into  his  inmost  self,  and  by  a  complete  suspension  of  all 
his  active  powers  to  become  absorbed  and  swallowed  up  in  the 
Infinite,  f  Plato  and  his  followers  sought  by  an  immediate  ab- 
straction to  apprehend  "  the  unchangeable  and  permanent  Being," 
and,  by  a  loving  contemplation,  to  become  "  assimilated  to  the 
Deity,"  and  in  this  way  to  attain  the  immediate  consciousness 
of  God.  The  Xeo-Platonic  mystic  sought  by  asceticism  and 
self-mortification  to  prepare  himself  for  divine  communings.  He 
would  contemplate  the  divine  perfections  in  himself;  and  in  an 
ecstatic  state,  wherein  all  individuality  vanishes,  he  would  realize 
a  union,  or  identity,  with  the  Divine  Essence.:}:  While  the 
universal  Church  of  God,  indeed,  has  in  her  purest  days  always 
taught  that  man  may,  by  inward  purity  and  a  believing  love,  be 
rendered  capable  of  spiritually  apprehending,"  and  consciously 
feeling,  the  presence  of  God.  Some  may  be  disposed  to  pro- 
nounce this  as  all  mere  mysticism.  "We  answer,  The  living 
internal  energy  of  religion  is  always  mystical,  it  is  grounded 
in  feeling — a  "  sennas  numinis  "  common  to  humanity.  It  is 
the  mysterious  sentiment  of  the  Divine  ;  it  is  the  prolepsis  of 
the  human  spirit  reaching  out  toward  the  Infinite;  the  living 

*  See  Parkhurst's  Lexicon,  under  Aecmdai/tovia,  which  Snidas  explains  by 
ti?.u3eia  -epi  rb  Qtiov — reverence  far  the  Divine,  and  Hesychius  by  6ot3o6ei.n—f-:or 
of  God.  Also,  Josephus,  Antui.,Book  X,  c.  3,  §  2  :  "  Ifanasscb,  cfter  his  rcf>ontauco 
and  reformation,  strove  to  behave  himself  (rp  detaidatftoi -/p  xP'/oOil)  in  the  most 
religious  manner  toward  God."     Also  see,  A.  Clarke  on  Acts  xvii. 

f  Vaughan's  "Houra  with  the  Mystics,"  vol.  i,  p.  44.  J  Ibid.,  voL  i,  p.  65. 


1S6  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

susceptibility  of  our  spiritual  nature  stretching  after  the  powers 
aud  influences  of  the  higher  world.  "  It  is  upon  this  inner  in- 
stinct of  the  supernatural  that  all  religion  rests.  I  do  not  say 
every  religious  idea,  but  whatever  is  positive,  practical,  power- 
ful, durable,  and  popular.  Every-where,  in  all  climates,  in  all 
epochs  of  history,  and  in  all  degrees  of  civilization,  man  is 
animated  by  the  sentiment — I  would  rather  say,  the  presenti- 
ment— that  the  world  in  which  he  lives,  the  order  of  things  in 
the  midst  of  which  he  moves,  the  facts  which  regularly  and 
constantly  succeed  each  other,  are  not  all.  In  vain  he  daily 
makes  discoveries  and  conquests  in  this  vast  universe ;  in  vain 
he  observes  and  learnedly  verifies  the  general  laws  which 
govern  it;  his  thought  is  not  inclosed  in  the  icorld  surrendered 
to  his  science  ;  the  spectacle  of  it  does  not  suffice  his  soul,  it 
is  raised  beyond  it ;  it  searches  after  and  catches  glimpses  of 
something  beyond  it ;  it  aspires  higher  both  for  the  universe 
and  itself;  it  aims  at  another  destiny,  another  master. 

"  '  Par  dela  tous  ces  cieux  le  Dieu  des  cieux  reside.' "  *    " 

So  Yoltaire  has  said,  and  the  God  who  is  beyond  the  skies  is 
not  nature  personified,  but  a  supernatural  Personality.  It  is 
to  this  highest  Personality  that  all  religions  address  them- 
selves. It  is  to  bring  man  into  communion  with  Him  that 
they  exist. "f 

4.  The  Athenians  had  that  deep  consciousness  of  sin  and 
guilt,  and  of  consequent  liability  to  punishment.,  which  confesses 
the  need  of  expiation  by  piacular  sacrifices. 

Every  man  feels  himself  to  be  an  accountable  being,  and  he 
is  conscious  that  in  wrong  doing  he  is  deserving  of  blame  and 
of  punishment.  Deep  within  the  soul  of  the  transgressor  is  the 
consciousness  that  he  is  a  guilty  man,  and  he  is  haunted  with 
the  perpetual  apprehension  of  a  retribution  which,  like  the 
specter  of  evil  omen,  crosses  his  every  path,  and  meets  him  at 
every  turn. 

"  'Tis  guilt  alone, 
Like  brain-sick  frenzy  in  its  feverish  mode, 
Fills  the  light  air  with  visionary  terrors, 
And  shapeless  forms  of  fear.'' 

*  "  Beyond  all  theso  heaven3  the  God  of  the  heavens  resides." 
f  Guizot,  "L'Eglise  et  lo  Society  Chretiennes  "  en  1861. 


1869.]  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  187 

Man  does  not  possess  this  consciousness  of  guilt  so  much  as 
it  holds  possession  of  him.  It  pursues  the  fugitive  from  justice, 
and  it  lays  hold  on  the  man  who  has  resisted  or  escaped  the 
hand  of  the  executioner.  The  sense  of  guilt  is  a  power  over 
and  above  man  ;  a  power  so  wonderful  that  it  often  compels  the 
most  reckless  criminal  to  deliver  himself  up,  with  the  confession 
of  his  deed,  to  the  sword  of  justice,  when  a  falsehood  would 
have  easily  protected  him.  Man  is  only  able  by  persevering, 
ever-repeated  efforts  at  self-induration,  against  the  remon- 
strances of  conscience,  to  withdraw  himself  from  its  power. 
His  success  is,  however,  but  very  partial ;  for  sometimes,  in  the 
moments  of  his  greatest  security,  the  reproaches  of  conscience 
break  in  upon  him  like  a  flood,  and  sweep  away  all  his  refuge 
of  lies.  "  The  evil  conscience  is  the  divine  bond  which  binds 
the  created  spirit,  even  in  deep  apostasy,  to  its  Original.  In 
the  consciousness  of  guilt  there  is  revealed  the  essential  relation 
of  our  spirit  to  God,  although  misunderstood  by  man  until  he 
has  something  higher  than  his  evil  conscience.  The  trouble 
and  anguish  which  the  remonstrances  of  this  consciousness 
excite — the  inward  unrest  which  sometimes  seizes  the  slave  of 
sin — are  proofs  that  he  has  not  quite  broken  away  from  God."  * 

In  Grecian  mythology  there  was  a  very  distinct  recognition 
of  the  power  of  conscience,  and  a  reference  of  its  authority  to 
the  Divinity,  together  with  the  idea  of  retribution.  Nemesis 
was  regarded  as  the  impersonation  of  the  'upbraidings  of  con- 
science, of  the  natural  dr^ad  of  punishment  that  springs  up  in 
the  human  heart  after  the  commission  of  sin.  And  as  the 
feeling  of  remorse  may  be  considered  as  the  consequence  of  the 
displeasure  and  vengeance  of  an  offended  God,  Nemesis  came 
to  be  regarded  as  the  goddess  of  retribution,  relentlessly  pur- 
suing the  guilty  until  she  has  driven  them  into  irretrievable 
woe  and  ruin.  The  Erinnyes  or  Eumcnides  are  the  deities 
whose  business  it  is  to  punish,  in  hades,  the  crimes  committed 
upon  earth.  "When  an  aggravated  crime  has  excited  their  dis- 
pleasure they  manifest  their  greatest  power  in  the  disquietude 
of  conscience. 

Along  with  this  deep  consciousness  of  guilt,  and  this  fear  of 
retribution  which  haunts  the  guilty  mind,  there  has  also  rested 
upon  the  heart  of  universal  humanity  a  deep  and  abiding  cou- 
♦Muller,  "Christian  Doctrino  of  Sin,"  voL  i,  pp.  225,  226.- 


1S8  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

viction  that  something  must  l>e  done  to  expiate  the  gnUt  of  sin — 
some  restitution  must  be  made,  some  Buffering  must  be  endured,* 
some  sacrifice  offered  to  atone  for  past  misdeeds.  Hence  it  is  that 
men  in  all  ages  have  had  recourse  to  penances  and  prayers,  to 
self-inflicted  tortures  and  costly  sacrifices  to  appease  a  righteous 
anger  which  their  sins  had  excited,  and  avert  an  impending 
punishment.  That  sacrifice  to  atone  for  sin  has  prevailed 
universally — that  it  has  been  practiced  "  semper,  uliqite,  et  ah 
omnibus"  always,  in  all  places,  and  by  all  men — will  not  be 
denied  by  the  candid  and  competent  inquirer.  The  evidence 
which  has  been  collected  from  ancient  history  by  Grotius  and 
Magee,  and  the  additional  evidence  from  contemporaneous 
history,  which  is  being  now  furnished  by  the  researches  of 
ethnologists  and  Christian  missionaries,  is  conclusive.  No  in- 
telligent man  can  doubt  the  fact.  Sacrificial  offerings  have 
prevailed  in  every  nation  and  in  every  age.  u  Almost  the  en- 
tire worship  of  the  pagan  nations  consisted  in  rites  of  depreca- 
tion. Fear  of  the  Divine  displeasure  seems  to  have  been  the 
leading  feature  of  their  religious  impressions ;  and  in  the 
diversity,  the  costliness,  the  cruelty  of  their  sacrifices  they 
sought  to  appease  gods  to  whose  wrath  they  felt  themselves 
exposed,  from  a  consciousness  of  sin,  unrelieved  by  any  in- 
formation as  to  the  means  of  escaping  its  effects."  f 

It  must  be  known  to  every  one  at  all  acquainted  with  Greek 
mythology  that  the  idea  of  expiation — atonement — was  a  funda- 
mental idea  of  their  religion.  Independent  of  any  historical 
research,  a  very  slight  glance  at  the  Greek  and  Roman  classics, 
especially  the  poets,  who  were  the  theologians  of  that  age,  can 
leave  little  doubt  upon  this  head.}:.     Their  language  cvery- 

*  "  Punishment  is  the  penalty  due  to  sin ;  or,  to  use  the  favorite  expression  of 
Homer,  not  unusual  in  the  Scriptures  also,  it  is  the  payment  of  a  debt  incurred  by 
sin.  When  he  is  punished,  the  criminal  is  said  to  pay  off  or  pay  back  (u-oriveiv) 
his  crimes;  in  other  words,  to  expiate  or  atone  for  them.  {Iliad,  iv,  161,  162.) 

"  '  cvv  re  firyuXu  a^ertcav 
aiv  cQijOiv  KtQaXijot  yvvax^i  re  nai  rzKitomv.' 

that  is,  they  shall  pay  ofT,  pay  back,  atone,  etc..  for  their  treachery  with  a  great 
price,  with  their  lives,  and  their  wives  and  children." — Tyler,  "Theology  of  Greek 
Poets,"  p.  19-1. 

\  Magee,  "On  the  Atonement,"  No.  5,  p.  30. 

X  In  Homer  the  doctrine  is  expressly  taught  that  the  gods  may,  and  sometimes 
do,  remit  the  penalty,  when  duly  propitiated  by  prayers  and  sacrifices  accompanied 


1869J  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  1S9 

where  announces  the  notion  of  propitiation,  and,  particularly 

the  Latin,  furnishes  the  terms  which  are  still  employed  in  the- 
ology. We  need  only  mention  the  words  i?,ao[i6g,  IXdo- 
K-ofiai,  Xvrpov,  tt e p i ip n \i a,  as  examples  from  the  Greek, 
and  placare,  proj?itiare,  expiare,  piacvlum,  from  the  Latin. 
All  these  indicate  that  the  notion  of  expiation  was  interwoven 
into  the  very  modes  of  thought  and  framework  of  the  language 
of  the  ancient  Greeks. 

AYe  do  not  deem  it  needful  to  discuss  at  length  the  question 
which  has  been  so  earnestly  debated  among  theologians,  as  to 
whether  the  idea  of  expiation  be  a  primitive  and  necessary 
idea  of  the  human  mind,  or  whether  the  practice  of  piacular 
sacrifices  came  into  the  postdiluvian  world  with  Noah,  as  a  posi- 
tive institution  of  a  primitive  religion  then  first  directly  insti- 
tuted by  God.  .  On  either  hypothesis  the  practice  of  expiatory 
rites  derives  its  authority  from  God ;  in  the  latter  case,  by  an 
outward  and  verbal  revelation,  in  the  former  by  an  inward  and 
intuitive  revelation. 

This  much,  however,  must  be  conceded  on  all  hands,  that 
there  are  certain  fundamental  intuitions,  universal  and  neces- 
sary, which  underlie  the  almost  universal  practice  of  expiatory 
sacrifice,  namely,  the  universal  consciousness  of  guilt,  and  the 
universal  conviction  that  something  must  he  done  to  expiate 
guilt,  to  compensate  for  wrong,  and  to  atone  for  past  misdeeds. 
But  how  that  expiation  can  be  effected,  how  that  atonement 
can  be  made,  is  a  question  which  reason  does  not  seem  com- 
petent to  answer.  That  personal  sin  can  be  atoned  for  by 
vicarious  suffering,  that  national  guilt  can  be  expiated  and 

by  suitable  reparations.  (''Iliad,"  Lr,  497,  sqq.)  "  Wc  have  a  practical  illustration 
of  this  doctriue  in  the  first  book  of  the  Iliad,  where  Apollo  averts  the  pestilence 
from  the  army,  when  the  daughter  of  his  priest  is  returned  without  ransom,  and 
a  sacrifice  (^/caro^J?;)  is  sent  to  the  altar  of  the  god  at  sacred  Chrysa.  .  .  .  Apollo 
hearkens  to  the  intercession  of  his  priest,  accepts  the  sacred  hecatomb,  is  de- 
lighted with  the  accompanying  songs  and  libations,  and  sends  back  the  embassy 
with  a  favoring  breeze,  and  a  favorable  answer  to  the  army,  who  meanwhile  had 
been  purifying  (u-c/.vfxai  va vro)  themselves,  and  offering  unblemished  hecatombs  of 
bulls  and  goats  on  the  shore  of  the  sea  which  washes  the  place  of  their  encampment." 
"The  object  of  the  propitiatory  embassy  to  Apollo  is  thus  stated  bjrUlysses: 
Agamemnon,  king  of  men,  has  sent  me  to  bring  back  thy  daughter  Chryses,  and 
to  offer  a  sacred  hecatomb  for  (v-cp)  the  Greeks,  that  we  may  propitiate 
(ri.aoofieada)  the  king,  who  now  sends  woes  and  many  groans  upon  the  Argives." 
(442,  sqq.)    Tyler,  "Theology  of  Greek  Poets,"  pp.  196,  197. 


190  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  [April, 

national  punishment  averted  by  animal  sacrifices,  or  even  by 
human  sacrifices,  is  repugnant  to  rather  than  conformable  with 
natural  reason.  There  exists  no  discernible  connection  be- 
tween the  one  and  the  other.  We  may  suppose  that  eucha- 
ristic,  penitential,  and  even  deprecatory  sacrifices  may  have 
originated  in  the  light  of  nature  and  reason,  but  we  are  unable 
to  account  for  the  practice  of  piacular  sacrifices  for  substitu- 
tional atonement,  on  the  same  principle.  The  ethical  prin- 
ciple, that  one's  own  sins  are  not  transferable  either  in  their 
guilt  or  punishment,  is  so  obvioushv  just  that  we  feel  it  must 
have  been  as  clear  to  the  mind  of  the  Greek  who  brought  his 
victim  to  be  offered  to  Zeus,  as  it  is  to  the  philosophic  mind  of 
to-day."  The  knowledge  that  the  Divine  displeasure  can  be 
averted  by  sacrifice  is  not,  by  Plato,  grounded  upon  any  intui- 
tion of  reason,  as  is  the  existence  of  God,  the  idea  of  the  true, 
the  just,  and  good,  but  on  "tradition,"f  and  the  "  interpretations" 
of  Apollo.  "  To  the  Delphian  Apollo  there  remains  the  great- 
est, noblest,  and  most  important  of  legal  institutions — the  erec- 
tion of  temples,  sacrifices,  and  other  services  to  the  gods,  .  .  . 
and  what  other  services  should  be  gone  through  with  a  view 
to  their  propitiation.  Such  things  as  these,  indeed,  we  neither 
know  ourselves,  nor  in  founding  the  State  would  ice  intrust 
them  to  others,  if  we  be  wise  .  .  .  the  god  of  the  country  is 
the  natural  interpreter  to  all  men  about  such  matters."  \ 

The  origin  of  expiatory  sacrifices  cannot,  we  think,  be  ex- 
plained except  on  the  principle  of  a  primitive  revelation  and 
a  positive  appointment  of  God.  They  cannot  be  understood 
except  as  a  Divinely-appointed  symbolism,  in  which  there  is 
exhibited  a  confession  of  personal  guilt  and  desert  of  punish- 
ment; an  intimation  and  a  hope  that  God  will  be  propitious 
and  merciful ;  and  a  typical  promise  and  prophecy  of  a  future 
Redeemer  from  sin,  who  shall  "put  away  sin  by  the  sacrifice 
of  himself."  This  sacred  rite  was  instituted  in  connection  with 
the  protevangdium  given  to  our  first  parents,  it  was  diffused 
among  the  nations  by  tradition,  and  has  been  kept  alive  as  a 
general,  and,  indeed,  almost  universal  observance,  by  that  deep 
sense  of  sin,  and  consciousness  of  guilt,  and  personal  urgency 

*  "  He  that  Lath  doue  the  deed,  to  suffer  for  it — thus  cries  a  proverb  thrice-hal- 
lowed by  age." — yEschylus,  Choeph,  311. 

f  Laws,  Book  VI,  c.  15.  \  Republic,  Book  IV,  c.  5. 


18G9.]  Religion  of  the  Athenians.  191 

of  the  need  of  a  reconciliation,  which  are  so  clearly  displayed 
in  Grecian  mythology. 

The  legitimate  inference  we  find  ourselves  entitled  to  draw 
from  the  words  of  Paul,  when  fairly  interpreted  in  the  light  of 
the  past  religious  history  of  the  world,  is,  that  the  Athenians 
were  a  religious  people ;  that  is,  they  were,  however  unknowing, 
believers  in  and  worshipers  of  the  One  Supreme  God. 


Art.  II.— THE  CHURCH  SCHOOL. 

The  modern  Sunday-school  has  outgrown  the  fondest  hopes  of 
its  founders.  Devised  as  a  temporary  expedient  for  the  edu- 
cation of  neglected  children  on  the  Sabbath,  it  developed  a 
form  of  Christian  activity  which,  in  its  essential  features,  was 
employed  in  the  primitive  Church,  had  also  a  place  in  the 
Jewish  economy,  and  which  is,  in  fact,  a  legitimate  outgrowth 
of  the  plan  of  redemption.  The  good  philanthropists  of  the 
last  century,  in  digging  that  they  might  build  a  human  fabric, 
laid  bare  an  ancient  and  divine  foundation.  Let  us  rear  our 
superstructure  upon  this,  rather  than  upon  their  narrower  bases 
and  after  their  scantier  measurements.  TVe  propose  in  the 
present  paper  to  examine  the  relations  of  the  Sunday-school  to 
the  Christian  scheme,  ascertain  its  distinctive  mission,  and 
draw  from  the  subject  some  practical  lessons. 

Let  us  begin  with  first  principles.  Man's  pupilage  as  a  pro- 
bationer on  earth  contemplates  his  perfection  as  a  saint  in 
heaven.  From  the  moment  of  his  regeneration,  the  processes 
of  spiritual  culture  should  go  on.  This  twofold  -work  of  quick- 
ening and  culture  is  effected  by  the  Holy  Spirit,  through  the 
truth  as  revealed  in  and  by  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ.  In  the  ap- 
plication of  this  truth  no  violence  is  done  to  either  man's  freedom 
or  the  laws  of  his  mental  action.  Light,  whether  from  the  sun 
or  the  planets,  is  conveyed  to  the  eye  through  the  same  medium, 
and  under  the  operation  of  the  same  laws.  The  constitution  of 
the  soul  is  not  changed  by  the  supernatural  interventions  of  re- 
demption. After  the  visitation  of  grace,  the  eye  sees,  the  ear 
hears,  memory  goes  backward,  hope  goes  forward,  and  all  the 
intellectual  powers  act  just  as  before.     The  Divine  Deliverer 


192  The  Church  School.  [April, 

and  Educator  of  the  race  has  respected  man's  constitution  in 
determining  the  methods  of  his  redemption.  Were  a  street- 
waif  to  be  taken  from  the  Five  Points  in  our  city,  and  taught 
under  the  most  competent  instructors  of  the  age,  we  affirm  that 
not  a  just  principle  would  he  recognized,  nor  a  correct  method 
adopted  in  his  training,  not  already  anticipated  and  applied  in 
the  management  of  the  waif  Israel  taken  from  the  land  of 
Goshen,  and  instructed  in  the  school  of  God  at  Mount  Sinai. 
The  same  principles  appear  again,  in  a  higher  form,  in  the 
methods  of  the  Great  Teacher.  They  are  also  present  in  his 
Church  whenever  she  is  under  his  direction,  for  they  inhere  in 
the  very  constitution  of  the  human  mind  and  of  the  Christian 
society. 

In  the  instruction  of  a  human  soul  there  are  three  important 
steps  to  be  taken :  1,  Truth  must  be  apprehended  by  the  in- 
tellect; 2,  accepted  by  the  affections;  3,  incorporated  in  the 
character.  This  threefold  work  is  indispensable.  One  want- 
ing, the  culture  is  incomplete.  In  the  Divine  scheme  all  are 
recognized,  and  for  each  an  appropriate  form  of  Church  instru- 
mentalities is  arranged.  We  have  referred  to  Israel  in  Egypt 
and  the  Wilderness.  Let  us  trace  the  divine  processes  in  the 
education  of  this  people  to  illustrate  the  position  assumed. 
Israel  was,  first  of  all,  removed  from  the  physical,  intellectual, 
and  moral  bondage  of  Egypt,  just  as  the  child  of  the  Five 
Points  would  be  separated  for  his  reform  and  education  from 
his  former  associations.  Israel  did  not  go  into  Canaan  by  the 
way  of  el-Arish  and  Philistia,  but  by  the  more  circuitous  route 
of  the  sea,  Sinai,  and  the  Jordan.  The  bondmen  of  Egypt 
were  not  at  once  prepared  for  the  Babe  of  Bethlehem.  They 
dwelt  in  the  sphere  of  the  material,  and  were  ignorant  of  spir- 
itual truth.  The  manifestation  of  physical  force  was  requisite 
in  order  to  the  recognition  of  their  Deliverer.  God  must 
needs  appear  as  a  Power,  breaking  into  fragments  and  tramp- 
ling under  foot  their  old  opinions  and  dominions.  The  new 
wonder-worker  must  distance,  with  unmistakable  miracle,  all 
competition  from  the  old  magician.  For  the  cup  of  blood  in 
the  sorcerer's  hand  a  river  of  blood  must  roll  to  the  sea. 
The  new  staff-serpent  must  swallow  the  conjurers'  rods,  and 
become  a  wand  in  the  Prophet's  grasp  again.  As  the  rap 
of  the  teacher's  hand  on  the  school  desk  reminds  the  pupil 


LSC9.]  The  Church  School.  193 

of  a  present  authority,  so  "  the  thunderings  and  the  light- 
nings, and  the  noise  of  the  trumpet,  and  the  mountain  smoking," 
caused  the  people  tremblingly  to  await,  and  then  revere,  the 
revelation.  The  fixed  attention  was  rewarded.  Truth  was 
given.  It  came  in  every  legal  and  ceremonial  enactment,  in 
every  miraculous  interposition,  in  every  address  of  God's 
Prophet.  In  the  communication  of  this  new  truth  to  Israel, 
how  beautifully  we  find  illustrated  the  now  popular  method  of 
"  object  teaching."  Spiritual  truth  entered  the  Hebrew  soul 
through  the  gateways  of  the  senses.  The  theology  of  the  Kew 
Testament  was  embodied  in  the  arrangements  and  ceremonies 
of  the  Tabernacle. 

Thus  we  find,  that  for  the  communication  of  truth  to  a  race, 
the  All-wise  God  prescribed  the  very  methods  which  wise 
teachers  now  employ  in  developing  the  intellect  of  a  child. 
Jesus  did  likewise.  He  laid  hold  of  the  visible,  using  similes, 
parables,  and  objects,  as  when  he  placed  a  child  before  the 
disciples  to  teach  them  humility,  or  called  for  a  penny,  and 
made  its  superscription  his  text.  In  the  department  of  re- 
ligious truth  the  same  method  is  still  employed.  What  is 
the  Christian  family  but  the  object-school  of  theological  truth, 
in  which  the  authority,  attributes,  and  laws  of  God  are  illus- 
trated, and  the  child  taught,  through  the  visible  relations  and 
real  experiences  of  daily  life,  the  invisible  and  eternal  verities 
of  the  kingdom  of  God  ?  The  Christian  family  is  the  taber- 
nacle for  the  communication  of  religious  ideas  to  its  children, 
separated  as  they  there  are,  from  the  demoralizing  tendencies 
of  worldly  society,  and  under  the  influences  of  parental  love 
and  authority.  Thus  God  provides  for  the  first  essential  thing 
in  the  application  to  man  of  his  grace  in  redemption — the 
apprehension  of  truth  by  the  intellect. 

The  truth  grasped  by  the  intellect  must  next  be  accepted  by 
the  will  and  affections,  for  truth  is  never  a  force  in  life  until 
the  heart  is  moved  and  molded  by  it.  The  pupil  in  the  secu- 
lar school  must  be  excited,  by  personal  interest  iu  his  work,  to 
Pelf-activity.  Israel  in  the  wilderness  learned  the  same  lesson. 
With  every  revelation  of  truth  God  made  new  requisitions 
upon  their  love  and  obedience.  By  the  strongest  man- 
dates of  authority,  by  the  most  terrible  sanctions  of  penalty, 
hy  the  fairest  attractions  of  promise,  God  commended  the 


194  The  Church  School.  [April, 

new  truth  to  the  heart  as  well  as  to  the  eye  and  intellect  of 
his  people. 

As  contributing  to  this  result,  the  people  were  assembled  in 
great  multitudes,  from  time  to  time,  to  hear  the  law  of  God  and 
the  appeals  of  his  servants.  The  Scriptures,  which  the  services 
of  the  tabernacle  and  the  providential  interpositions  of  God 
had  made  clear  to  their  understanding,  were  publicly  read.  On 
every  such  occasion  the  heart  of  the  people  was  stirred.  The 
blessings  and  the  cursings  rang  out  in  the  valley  of  Shechem, 
and  the  elders,  officers,  and  judges,  "  the  women  and  the  little 
ones,  and  the  strangers-  that  were  conversant  among  them," 
listened  attentively.  The  outspokeu  response  of  "  all  the 
people  "  elicited  at  that  time  was  a  virtual  consecration  of 
themselves  to  God.  "When  Joshua  addressed  all  the  tribes 
before  his  death,  after  his  fervent  appeal  to  them  to  "  fear  the 
Lord  and  serve  him  in  sincerity  and  in  truth,"  he  bids  them 
make  their  choice  between  the  God  of  Israel  and  the  gods  of 
the  Chaldeans  and  the  Amorites.  Under  the  pressure  of  this 
public  review  of  God's  dealings  with  them,  and  this  impas- 
sioned appeal  of  the  venerable  leader,  the  people  cry  out, 
u  God  forbid  that  we  should  forsake  the  Lord,  to  serve  other 
gods."  How  was  the  heart  of  the  people  moved  by  the  public 
services  performed  in  Jerusalem,  when  the  corner-stone  of  the 
new  temple  was  laid  in  the  time  of  Ezra.  And  when  the 
people  gathered  themselves  together  as  one  man  to  hear  Ezra 
read  from  the  book  of  the  law  of  Moses,  it  is  recorded  that 
"all  the  people  wept  when  they  heard  the  words  of  the  law." 

There  was  a  profound  reason  in  the  command  to  "  gather 
the  people  together,  men,  and  women,  and  children,  and  thy 
stranger  that  is  within  thy  gates,  that  they  may  hear,  and 
that  they  may  learn,  and  fear  the  Lord  your  God;  nnd 
observe  to  do  all  the  words  of  this  law."  Deut.  xxxi,  12.  The 
public  assembly  is  favorable  to  the  development  of  strong 
emotion.  The  truth  which  may  be  more  distinctly  outliued  to 
the  thought  in  private,  may  be  more  easily  impressed  upon 
the  heart  in  public.  To  the  tabernacle  system  for  the  convey- 
ance of  the  religious  idea,  God  added  the  public  assembly  for 
the  awakening  of  the  sensibilities  and  the  persuasion  of  the 
people  to  accept  and  obey  the  truth.  So  to-day  we  have  the 
family  tabernacle,  and  then  the  pulpit.     The  first  and  dis- 


18C9.]  The  Church  School  195 

tinctive  work  of  the  pulpit  is  to  convict  the  conscience  and 
convert  tbe  soul.  "  "We  persuade  men,"  said  Paul.  "  We  pray 
you  in  Christ's  stead,  be  ye  reconciled  to  God."  Addressing 
those  whose  conscious  needs  respond  to  its  announcements, 
the  pulpit  does  not  so  much  depend  upon  processes  of  argu- 
mentation. It  brings  available  remedies  for  actual  distresses, 
a  message  of  reprieve  to  the  condemned,  vision  to  blindness, 
purity  to  sin.  It  informs  the  intellect,  quickens  the  conscience, 
warms  the  emotions,  and  impels  to  decision  ;  not  so  much 
starting  the  intellectual  forces  into  activity,  as  bringing  the 
will  up  to  the  well-established  affirmations  of  the  judgment. 
The  pulpit  disseminates  the  truth  rapidly.  One  utterance  may 
reach  ten  thousand  souls  at  the  same  moment.  The  invisible 
bond  of  sympathy  that  unites  an  audience,  renders  each  hearer 
more  accessible  and  susceptible  to  the  truth.  The  universal 
silence,  the  fixed  attention,  the  tacit  assent  of  all  to  the  truth 
declared,  tend  to  inspire  the  speaker.  The  whole  argument  is 
in  his  own  hands.  ISTo  voice  can  enter  its  protest.  Then  the 
dramatic  elements  of  countenance,  gesture,  and  intonation  in- 
crease the  effect  of  every  sentence.  These  are  some  of  the 
natural  advantages  possessed  by  the  pulpit.  And  when  we  re- 
call the  Divine  promise  to  accompany  the  truth  by  the  energy 
of  his  Spirit,  we  do  not  wonder  at  the  power  of  this  instrumen- 
tality. To  the  Jew,  lost  in  the  mummeries  of  a  dead  ritualism — 
to  the  Greek,  deluded  by  the  charms  of  a  merely  speculative 
philosophy — we  are  not.  surprised  that  the  public  proclamation 
of  salvation  through  a  crucified  Jew  should  be  "foolishness;" 
but  seeing  now  the  bearings  of  the  truth  preached,  and  the 
effectiveness  of  the  method,  and  having  enjoyed  the  fulfill- 
ment of  the  promise,  "Lo,  I  am  with  you,"  we  acknowledge 
the  preaching  of  the  Gospel  to  be  "  the  power  of  God." 

After  the  truth  has  found  a  place  in  the  understanding 
through  the  early  teachings  and  clear  illustrations  of  the 
Family,  and  in  the  affections  through  the  appeals  and 
persuasions  of  the  Pulpit,  the  convert  enters  the  inner 
courts  of  the  Church  as  a  disciple.  He  has  now  commenced 
a  life  of  study,  struggle,  and  service.  lie  is  a  6ort  of  soldier- 
student,  It  is  his  duty  to  build  up  the  temple  of  God  within 
him.  And  he  must  build  as  they  did  in  J^ehemiah's  day, 
when  "  every  one  with  one  of  bis  bands  wrought  in  the  work, 


196  The  Church  School.  [April, 

and  with  the  other  hand  held  a  weapon."  Here  begins  the 
School  of  Christ.  Having  made  ';  disciples,"  the  Church  must 
instruct  them.  An  eminent  commentator,  in  his  notes  upon 
Acts  xiv,  22,  says  :  "  The  word  disciple  signifies  literally  a 
scholar.  The  Church  of  Christ  was  a  school,  in  which  Christ 
himself  was  chief  master,  and  his  Apostles  subordinate  teach- 
ers. All  the  converts  were  disciples  or  scholars  who  came  to 
this  school  to  be  instructed  in  the  knowledge  of  themselves 
and  of  their  God ;  of  their  duty  to  him,  to  the  Church,  to 
society,  and  to  themselves.  After  having  been  initiated  in  the 
principles  of  the  heavenly  doctrine,  they  needed  line  upon  line, 
and  precept  upon  precept,  in  order  that  they  might  be  con- 
firmed and  established  in  the  truth."* 

Thus,  for  the  threefold  work  committed  to  her,  we  find  the 
Church  assuming  a  threefold  form.  1.  To  present  the  truth 
illustratively  and  clearly  to  the  understanding,  we  have  the 
Family  •  2.  To  secure  a  personal  allegiance,  we  have  the 
Pulpit;  3.  To  mold  and  perfect  character,  after  the  standard 
and  by  the  operation  of  the  truth,  we  have  the  School.  "We 
certainly  do  not  assume  that  in  every  case  this  series  of  agencies 
is  formally  employed,  for  the  family  has,  alas!  too  often  re- 
fused to  be  part  of  Christ's  Church.  It  has  not  taught  the  truth  to 
its  members.  Aud  the  family  having  failed  to  give  its  children 
to  the  pulpit,  there  are  too  few  disciples  of  Christ  in  this  world. 

But  the  Church,  from  the  divine,  reconstructive  force  within 

♦  The  -wording  of  the  Master's  commission  (Matthew  xxviii,  19,  20,)  deserves  our 
consideration :  il  Go  ye  therefore  and  teach  (fiaQnTEvoare,  that  is,  disciple,  or 
make  disciples  of  )  all  nations,  baptizing  them  in  the  name  of  the  Father,  and  of 
the  Son,  and  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  TEACHING,  (dtdaoKovrec,  that  is,  instructing.) 
them  to  observe  all  things  whatsoever  I  have  commanded  you."  "  This  teaching  is 
nothing  kis  than  the  building  up  of  the  whole  man  into  the  obedience  of  Christ. 
In  these  words,  inasmuch  as  the  then  living  disciples  could  not  teach  all  nations, 
does  the  Lord  found  the  office  of  preaclvirs  in  his  Church — with  all  that  belongs  to 
it — the  duties  of  the  minister,  the  school-teacher,  the  Scripture  reader.  This  'teach- 
ing' is  not  merely  the  Kijpvyfia  of  the  Gospel,  not  mere  proclamation  of  the 
good  news,  but  the  whole  catechetical  office  of  the  Church  upon  and  in  the  bap- 
tized " — Alford. 

"  When  through  baptism  the  believer  had  become  a  member  of  the  community 
of  the  saints,  theu,  as  such,  he  participated  in  the  progressive  courses  of  instruc- 
tion which  prevailed  in  the  Church." — Obhausen. 

"  The  teaching  is  a  continuous  process — a  thorough  indoctrinatiou  in  tho  Chris- 
tian truth,  and  the  building  up  of  tho  whole  man  into  the  full  manhood  of  Christ, 
the  author  and  finisher  of  our  faith." — Dr.  Schaff. 


I860.]  The  Church  School.  197 

lier,  proceeds  to  perforin  the  part  of  the  Christian  family  by 
the  organization  of  her  mission  Sunday-schools.  These  be- 
come the  substitute  for  home  to  millions  of  neglected  children. 
They  become  the  temporary  substitute  for  the  pulpit.  For  a 
time,  they  took  the' place  of  the  secular  school.  How  blessed 
the  mission,  and  how  abundant  the  successes  of  this  compar- 
atively modern  expedient  for  saving  and  instructing  "  the 
stranger  within  our  gates!"  It  is  John  the  Baptist  pointing 
the  untaught  multitudes  to  the  "  Lamb  of  God."  It  is  the  true 
god-mother  of  the  Church,  folding  to  her  bosom  the  orphaned 
ones,  and  giving  them  up  in  holy  consecration  to  God. 

But  our  Church  school  is  quite  another  institution.  It  is 
composed  largely  of  the  children  of  Church  members.  It  is 
not  intended  to  be  a  substitute  for  the  family,  the  pulpit,  the 
pastorate,  or  the  secular  school.  Nor  is  it  designed  to  be  ex- 
clusively a  children's  institution. 

%  The  theory  underlying  a  moral  instrumentality  has  more  to 
do  with  its  efficiency  than  might  at  first  be  supposed.  The 
prestige  of  ecclesiastical  recognition,  and  much  more  of  divine 
authority,  gives  great  advantage  to  any  method  of  Christian 
effort.  The  fact  that  it  has  a  philosophical  fitness,  at  once  en- 
nobles it  in  the  esteem  of  men  who  judge  of  a  method  by  its 
antecedent  principles,  and  accept  what  is  logically  true,  even 
without  reference  to  its  efficiency  in  practice.  If  we  can  show 
that  the  Church  school  has  its  place  in  the  system  of  divine 
methods,  a  virtual  divine  authority,  a  rational  basis,  and  the 
indorsement  of  early  example,  Ave  may  enlist  valuable  talent 
in  its  support,  and,  on  the  other  hand,  guard  with  greater  cer- 
tainty against  the  lamentable  neglect  of  other  means  of  grace 
which  a  one-sided  view  of  the  Sunday-school  has  occasioned. 
If  the  institution  is  regarded  as  a  substitute  for  the  Christian 
family,  we  need  not  be  surprised  if  parents  accept  its  service, 
and  neglect  responsibilities  at  home  from  which  nothing  can 
justly  relieve  them.  If  we  make  it  a  substitute  for  the  pulpit, 
we  may  expect  its  members  to  neglect  the  ministry  of  the  Word, 
and  thus  foster  the  unpleasant  antagonisms  between  "  Church 
and  Sunday-school."  between  "pastor  and  superintendent," 
over  which  so  many  faithful  hearts  have  already  mourned. 
If  it  is  for  children  only,  since  children  in  these  days  so  soon 
pass  into  maturity,  becoming  adults  ten  years  earlier  than 

Fourth  Seriks,  Vol.  XXI. — 13 


193  The  Church  School.  [April, 

was  the  wont  a  century  ago,  we  need  not  be  surprised  if  our 
youth,  as  soon  as  parental  restraint  is  relaxed,  drop  out  of  the 
school,  and  not  having  been  trained  to  attend  "  public  service," 
find  it  convenient  to  neglect  that  also.  If  only  for  children, 
since  it  is  commonly  supposed  that  labor  in  their  behalf  requires 
"  peculiar  gifts,"  and  these  not  always  in  highest  repute  among 
the  "theologians,"  we  need  not  be  surprised  that  large  num- 
bers of  ministers  look  down  with  a  lofty  condescension  upon 
the  institution,  patronizingly  commend  it,  and  then  neglect  it. 
What,  then,  is  the  Church  Sunday-school  ?  "We  answer :  It 
is  that  department  of  the  Church  which  promotes  the  life, 
growth,  and  activity  of  believers  through  the  study  of  the 
Holy  Scriptures.  It  is  the  training  department  of  the  Church. 
It  is  not  merely  for  conversion.  If  that  work  has  been  neg- 
lected in  any  case,  then  conversion  is  the  first  thing  to  be 
sought.  But  the  main  thing  in  the  Church  school  is  the  de- 
velopment, training,  and  growth  of  the  disciples,  old  and 
young.  It  is  not  merely  a  biblical  school  for  intellectual  fur- 
nishing in  divine  truth.  It  is  for  spiritual  edification.  It  is 
not  merely  for  children,  but  for  Christians  of  all  ages.  As 
preaching  and  the  accompanying  services  of  the  sanctuary  are 
for  children  as  well  as  adults,  the  school  is  for  adults  as  well  as 
children.  Here  the  instructions  of  the  family,  the  secular 
school,  and  the  pulpit  are  supplemented  by  class  recitation, 
discussion,  and  conversation.  Here  take  place  the  activity 
and  attrition  of  brain  and  heart  by  which  truth  is  made  clearer 
to  the  understanding,  and  gains  a  firm  hold  upon  the  affections. 
And  this  is  indispensable  to  the  highest  form  of  Christian  life. 
The  pulpit  persuades.  It  also  fosters  the  divine  life  by  the 
frequent  reiteration  of  the  prominent  doctrines  of  Scripture  by 
its  expositions,  arguments,  and  illustrations.  But  the  Church 
has  something  to  do  beyond  the  persuasion  and  lecture-teach- 
ing of  the  pulpit.  This  additional  work  has  been  admirably 
stated  by  the  Rev.  Augustus  William  Hare  of  England,  one 
of  the  authors  of  "  Guesses  at  Truth."  In  a  sermon  on  "  Grace 
and  peace  be  multiplied  unto  you  through  the  knowledge  of 
God  and  of  Jesua  our  Lord,"  lie  saya,  "Our  forefathers  carried 
on  the  education  of  the  poor  by  frequent  and  diligent  catechis- 
ing ;  that  is,  by  questioning  them  over  and  over  about  the  great 
truths  and  facta  and  doctrines  of  Christianity.     But  now  that 


18G9  J  The  Church  School.  199 

preaching  is  looked  upon  as  the  great  thing  in  every  Church, 
this  catechising  or  questioning  lias  in  many  places  fallen  into 
disuse.  To  profit  by  a  sermon,  a  man  must  attend  to  it:  he 
must  hear  it  thoroughly ;  he  must  understand  it ;  he  must 
think  it  over  with  himself  when  he  gets  home.  How  few  in 
any  congregation  will  go  to  all  this  trouble !  You  come,  and 
sit,  and  hear,  and  I  hope  are  able  in  some  degree  to  follow  the 
meaning  of  what  I  say  to  you  from  the  pulpit ;  yet  how  far  is 
this  from  the  understanding  and  the  knowledge  by  which 
grace  and  peace  are  to  be  multiplied !  But  when  a  person  is 
catechised,  when  he  is  asked  questions,  and  called  on  to  answer 
them,  he  must  think,  he  must  brace  up  his  mind ;  unless  he  is 
determined  not  to  learn,  he  can  scarce  help  being  taught  some- 
thing. And  those  who  want  to  learn,  those  who  feel  a  wish 
to  improve,  and  to  grow  in  a  knowledge  of  their  Lord  and 
Master,  what  progress  must  they  make  under  such  instruc- 
tion !  "When  I  speak  thus  of  catechising,  do  not  think  I  mean 
to  decry  preaching.  Both  are  useful  in  their  turns.  Unless 
the  mind  be  prepared  by  catechising,  preaching  loses  half 
its  use." 

If  the  principles  we  have  announced  be  correct,  we  may  ex- 
pect to  find  in  the  primitive  Church  something  corresponding 
to  the  institution  we  have  described.  That  it  should  be  in  ex- 
act resemblance  to  the  school  of  our  times  is  not  necessary  to 
establish  their  identity.  In  many  respects,  the  other  religious 
services  of  the  first  and  nineteenth  centuries  widely  differ. 
No  divinely  authorized  mode  of  government  or  worship  is  laid 
down  in  the  New  Testament.  The  early  Christians  probably 
followed  the  forms  of  the  Jewish  synagogue,  to  which  they 
had  always  been  accustomed,  with  such  modifications  as  the 
example  of  Jesus  and  the  conditions  and  social  characteristics 
of  their  community  demanded.  Love  for  the  Master,  famil- 
iarity with  his  simple  ways,  fellowship  in  his  sorrow,  and  an 
eager  looking  for  his  second  comiug,  must  have  given  to  the 
religious  worship  of  these  Christians  a  beautiful  simplicity  and 
spontaneity.  Their  remembrance  of  "  the  words  of  the  Lord 
Jesus,"  daily  recalled  by  the  oral  testimony  of  those  who  were 
eye-witnesses  of  his  life  and  inspired  reporters  of  his  teachings; 
the  new  significance  of  the  Old  Testament  Scriptures ;  their 
faith  in  the  Word  as  an  instrument  of  salvation — all  these 


200  The  Church  School.  [April. 

combined  to  give  a  deep  interest  to  the  constant  study  and 
practical  application  of  the  truth.  It  is  simply  impossible  to 
suppose  that  in  those  days  of  vivid  experience  and  intense  ac- 
tivity, the  services  of  Christians  were  limited  to  the  formal 
modes  of  our  modern  Churches.  We  learn  that  "  they  con- 
tinued steadfastly  in  the  Apostles'  doctrine,"  the  "  word  of 
Christ  dwelt  in  them  richly,"  and  in  all  wisdom  they  taught 
and  admonished  one  another.  Several  facts  aid  us  in  answer- 
ing the  question,  How  did  the  primitive  Christians  thus  teach 
and  edify  each  other? 

1.  They  were  undoubtedly  guided  by  the  Master's  example, 
for  they  remained  in  the  world  to  fulfill  his  commission: 
"  Make  disciples,  baptize,  instruct."  Jesus  was  pre-eminently 
the  "  Great  Teacher."  His  methods  were  rather  those  of  the 
modern  school  than  of  the  modern  pulpit.  By  questions,  con- 
versations, and  illustrations,  he  excited  the  minds  of  his  dis- 
ciples to  self-activity.  His  longest  addresses  were  frequently 
in  reply  to  some  inquiry  which  his  own  teachings  had  awak- 
ened. His  "What  is  written  in  the  law?"  "How  readest 
thou  ?"  "  Understandest  thou  this?"  "  What  reason  ye  in  your 
hearts?"  "Have  ye  not  read  what  David  did?"  "'Is  it  lawful 
on  the  Sabbath  days  to  do  good  ?"  all  these  are  after  the  man- 
ner of  the  teacher,  who  awakens  and  dravjs  out  the  mind  of  the 
pupil.  And  even  after  his  public  addresses  or  sermons,  in 
which  he  spake  the  Word  to  the  people  "as  they  were  able  to 
hear  it,"  "  when  they  were  alone,  he  expounded  all  things  to 
his  disciples."  Familiar  with  his  words  and  modes,  the  early 
disciples  went  forth  to  "  preach  and  teach  in  his  name." 

2.  The  early  Church  undoubtedly  followed  very  closely  the 
methods,  of  the  synagogue*  There  the  Word  of  God  was  not 
only  read,  but  expounded,  and  this  in  addition  to  the  regular 
discourse  or  sermon.     Vitringa,  in  referring  to  this  point,  says, 

*  "Very  few  particulars  are  given  of  the  regulations  established,  of  the  appoint- 
ment of  the  several  orders  of  ministers,  of  the  Divine  service  celebrated,  or,  in 
short,  of  any  of  the  details  of  matters  pertaining  to  a  Christian  Church.  One 
reason  for  this,  probably,  was,  that  a  Jewish  synagogue,  or  a  collection  of  syna- 
gogues in  the  same  neighborhood,  became  at  once  a  Christian  Church,  as  soon  as 
the  worshipers,  or  a  considerable  portion  of  them,  had  embraced  the  Gospel,  and 
had  separated  themselves  from  uubelievers.  They  had  only  to  make  such  additions 
to  their  public  service,  and  such  alterations  as  were  required  by  their  reception 
of  the  Gospel,  leaving  every  thing  else  as  it  was." — Archbishop  WhaUly. 


1809.]  The  Church  School.  201 

"  There  was  first  read  a  portion  of  the  law,  which  was  explained 
bjT  a  running  commentary ;  so  that  the  discourses  in  the 
ancient  synagogue  were  not  at  all  similar  to  the  sermons  of  the 
present  day,  but  were  rather  exegeses  and  paraphrases  of  what 
was  either  remarkable  or  obscure  in  the  portion  read.  But 
besides  the  running  commentary  or  paraphrase,  there  was 
frequently  a  discourse  (analogous  to  our  sermon)  after  the 
usual  service  of  the  synagogue."  But  this  was  not  all,  for 
either  in  the  synagogue  proper,  or  in  an  adjoining  room,  after 
the  regular  service,  discussions  and  more  thorough  investiga- 
tions of  the  truth  were  carried  on.  To  these  "disputations" 
reference  is  frequently  made  in  the  New  Testament.  (Acts  vi, 
9,  10 ;  ix,  22,  29 ;  xix,  S,  9  ;  xxii,  3 ;  2  Tim.  ii,  2.)  All  Jews 
were  admitted,  and  all  allowed  to  ask  questions.  There,  the 
reading  and  preaching  of  the  synagogue  were  followed  by 
teaching  and  searching  the  Word.*  In  the  light  of  this  fact 
we  understand  the  allusions  of  the  Apostle  to  the  customs  of  the 
early  Christians.  They  met  to  sing  and  pray  and  hear  the 
truth.      But  they  also  "spake  together,"  as  in  the  days  of 

*  "In  the  Jerusalem  Talmud,  a  tradition  is  alleged  that  there  had  been  at  Jeru- 
salem four  hundred  and  sixty  synagogues,  each  of  which  contained  an  apartment 
for  the  reading  of  the  law,  and  another  for  the  meeting  of  men  for  inquiry,  dicp  r& 
searc\  and  instruction.  Such  a  meeting-ball  is  called  by  the  Talmudists  BY1H  fa 
that  is,  an  apartment  where  lectures  were  given  or  conversations  held  on  various 
subjects  of  inquiry.  There  were  three  of  these  meeting-places  in  the  temple,  and 
in  all  of  them  it  was  the  custom  for  the  6tudents  to  sit  on  the  floor,  while  the 
teachers  occupied  raised  seats ;  hence  Paul  describes  himself  as  having,  when  a 
student,  "  sat  at  the  feet  of  Gamaliel."  Acts  xxii,  3.  There  are  many  hints  in  the 
Talmud  which  throw  light  upon  the  manner  of  proceeding  in  these  assemblies. 
Thus  a  student  asked  Gamaliel  whether  the  evening  prayer  was  obligatory  by  the 
law  or  not.  He  answered  in  the  affirmative;  on  which  the  student  informed  him 
that  R.  Joshua  had  told  him  that  it  was  not  obligatory.  'Well,'  said  Gamaliel, 
'  when  he  appears  to-morrow  in  the  assembly,  step  forward  and  ask  him  "the  ques- 
tion again.'  He  did  so,  and  the  expected  answer  raised  a  discussion,  a  full  account 
of  which  is  given.  The  meeting-places  of  the  wise  stood  mostly  in  connection 
with  the  synagogues;  and  the  wise  or  learned  men  usually  met  soon  after  divine 
worship  and  reading  were  over  in  the  upper  apartment  of  the  synagogues,  in  order 
to  discuss  those  matters  which  required  more  research  aud  inquiry.  The  pupils 
or  students  in  those  assemblies  were  not  mere  boys  coming  to  bo  instructed  in  the 
rudiments  of  knowledge,  but  men  or  youths  of  more  or  less  advanced  education, 
who  came  thither  either  to  profit  by  listening  to  the  learned  discussions,  or  to 
participate  in  them  themselves.  These  meetings  were  public,  admitting  any  one, 
though  not  a  member,  and  even  allowing  him  to  propose  questions.  These 
assemblies  and  meetings  were  still  in  existeuco  in  the  time  of  Christ  and  his 
Apostles."— Kilto. 


202  The  Church  School.  [April, 

Malachi,  (iii,  16,)  and  edified  one  another.  This  explains 
also  the  counsels  of  the  Apostle  in  1  Cor.  xiv,  26-33,  where  he 
guards  this  liberty  of  the  Church  against  abuse.  The  prophecy 
of  Joel  had  been  fulfilled,  (ii,  28,  29,)  and  even  upon  "'serv- 
ants" and  "  handmaids  "  the  Spirit  had  been  poured  out.  Paul 
warned  against  extravagance,  and  condemned  the  noisy,  un- 
edifying,  unsatisfactory  rhapsodizing  of  some  Corinthian  Chris- 
tians. There  were  in  the  first  century  (as  there  are  in  the 
nineteenth)  disciples  who  had  "a  zeal  of  God,  but  not  accord- 
ing to  knowledge." 

3.  The  high  estimate  placed  upon  the  study  of  the  Word  by 
Christ,  the  Apostles,  and  the  Christian  Fathers,  must  have  pro- 
duced its  effect  upon  the  early  Church.  In  the  days  of  Moses 
the  instruction  of  youth  by  their  parents  in  the  law  of  God 
had  been  commanded.  (Deut.  vi,  6-9.)  This  practice  is  beauti- 
fully illustrated  in  the  case  of  Timothy,  to  whom  Paul  refers  in 
his  second  Epistle,  i,  5 ;  iii,  Jo.  In  the  Mishna  it  is  written, 
"  At  five  years  of  age  let  children  begin  the  Scripture  ;  at  ten 
the  Mishna,  and  at  thirteen  let  them  be  subjects  of  the  law." 
Schools  were  also  organized  for  the  purpose  of  training  Jewish 
youth.  Even  the  day-schools  of  Judaism  were  Bible  schools. 
This  precedent  was  not  forgotten  by  the  early  disciples. 
Dr.  Mosheim,  in  his  Ecclesiastical  History,  (first  century,) 
says  that  "  Christians  took  all  possible  care  to  accustom  their 
children  to  the  study  of  the  Scriptures,  and  to  instruct  them 
in  the  doctrines  of  their  holy  religion  ;  and  schools  were  every- 
where erected  for  this  purpose,  even  from  the  very  commence- 
ment of  the  Christian  Church." 

This  high  appreciation  of  the  "Word,  its  use  in  the  family, 
the  school,  the  synagogue,  and  the  "  assembly  of  the  wise," 
accounts  for  the  perfect  familiarity  with  it  which  the  Apostles 
evince  in  their  recorded  discourses.  One  is  struck  with  this 
in  Peter's  sermon  on  the  day  of  Pentecost,  in  Stephen's  final 
address,  and  in  Paul's  speech  at  Antioch.  In  view  of  all 
these  facts  we  cannot  suppose  that  the  early  Christians  were 
satisfied  with  merely  listening  to  discourses  on  the  truths  of 
Christianity.  The  new  meanings  of  the  Old  Testament  which 
the  life  and  teachings  of  Christ,  opened  to  their  understanding, 
their  remembrance  of  the  Lord's  precious  words,  the  abundant 
outpouring  of  the  Spirit,  their  familiarity  with  the  exegetical 


1869.]  The  Church  School  203 

and  conversational  methods  of  the  schools  and  "  assemblies," 
warrant  us  in  concluding  that  they,  as  "  disciples,"  met  not 
only  to  pray,  and  commemorate  in  the  "  supper  "  the  passion 
of  our  Lord,  but  by  prophesyings  and  teachings  to  insure 
"steadfastness  in  the  Apostles'  doctrine." 

This  is  further  apparent  from  the  emphasis  placed  upon  the 
Holy  Scriptures  by  Luke  and  the  Apostles.  The  Bereans  were 
especially  commended  as  "  noble,"  inasmuch  as  "  they  received 
the  AYord  with  all  readiness  of  mind,  and  searched  the  Scrip- 
tures daily,  whether  these  things  were  so."  Acts  xvii,  11. 
Paul  advises  the  Christian  warrior  to  be  girt  about  the  loins 
with  truth,  and  to  take  the  "sword  of  the  Spirit,  which  is  the 
word  of  God."  Eph.  vi,  11, 17.  To  the  Elders  of  the.  Ephesian 
Church  whom  he  met  at  Aliletus  the  Apostle  says,  "  And  now, 
brethren,  I  commend  you  to  God,  and  to  the  Word  of  his  grace, 
which  is  able  to  build  you  up,  and  to  give  you  an  •inheritance 
among  all  them  which  are  sanctified."'  Acts  xx,  32.  Had  not 
Paul  heard  of  the  Master's  prayer :  "  Sanctify  them  through 
thy  truth  ;  thy  word  is  truth  ?  "  To  Timothy  he  writes :  ;;  All 
Scripture  is  given  by  inspiration  of  God,  and  is  profitable  for 
doctrine,  for  reproof,  for  correction,  for  instruction  in  righteous- 
ness :  that  the  man  of  God  may  he  perfect,  thoroughly  fur- 
nished unto  all  good  works."  2  Tim.  iii,  16,  17.  The  direction 
given  to  the  Church  at  Colosse  is  very  explicit.  Xo  modern 
Church  school  can  desire  a  more  perfect  charter.  On  this 
passage  the  Rev.  Dr.  Adam  Clarke  says,  "  I  believe  the  Apostle 
means  that  the  Colossians  should  be  well  instructed  in  the 
doctrine  of  Christ ;  that  it  should  be  their  constant  study  ;  that 
it  should  be  frequently  preached,  explained,  and  enforced 
among  them ;  and  that  all  the  wisdoui  comprised  in  it  should 
be  well  understood.  .  .  .  Through  bad  pointing  this  verse  is 
not  very  intelligible ;  the  several  members  of  it  should  be  dis- 
tinguished thus  :  '  Let  the  doctrine  of  Christ  dwell  richly  amoii" 
you;  teaching  and  admonishing  each  other  in  all  wisdom; 
singing  with  grace  in  your  hearts  unto  the  Lord,  in  psalms  and 
hymn  and  spiritual  songs.'  This  arrangement  the  original 
"will  not  only  bear,  but  it  absolutely  requires  it,  and  is  not 
sense  without  it."  What  a  description  of  a  thinking,  grow- 
ing, spiritual  Church!  Did  they  only  hear  preaching  once 
oi"  twice   a   week  I     In    the    social    meetings    was    there  no 


204  The  Church  School.  LAprfl, 

study   and    teaching    of   the    "  doctrine,"    "  wisdom,"    WORD 
of  God  ? 

4.  The  appointment  of  teachers,  referred  to  in  the  Epistles, 
recognizes  the  school  element  of  the  Church.  (Horn,  xii,  6,  7 ; 
1  Cor.  xii,  28  ;  Eph.  iv,  11.)  All  these  officers  are  given  "  for 
the  perfecting  of  the  saints,  for  the  work  of  the  ministry,  for 
the  edifying  of  the  body  of  Christ:  till  we  all  come  in  the 
unity  of  the  faith,  and  of  the  knowledge  of  the  Son  of  God, 
unto  a  perfect  man,  unto  the  measure  of  the  stature  of  the  full- 
ness of  Christ."  Paul,  in  the  verses  succeeding,  (14-16,)  con- 
templates the  growth  of  the  believers  through  the  truth,  every 
joint  supplying  somewhat,  every  part  working  effectually, 
making  "  increase  of  the  body  unto  the  edifying  of  itself  in 
love."  He  says,  "  The  body  is  not  one  member  but  many.  Xow 
ye  are  the  body  of  Christ  and  members  in  particular.  And 
God  hath  set  some  in  the  Church,  first  apostles,  secondarily 
prophets,  thirdly  teachers,  after  that  miracles,  then  gifts  of 
healing,  helps,  governments,  diversities  of  tongues."  These 
"prophets"  spake  unto  men  "to  edification  and  exhortation 
and  comfort."  The  "  evangelists,"  according  to  Olshausen, 
"journeying  about,  labored  for  the  wider  extension  of  the 
Gospel."  So  the  "  teachers,"  according  to  Clarke,  (Horn,  xii,  7,) 
"  were  persons  whose  office  it  was  to  instruct  others,  whether 
by  catechising,  or  simply  explaining  the  grand  truths  of  Chris- 
tianity." 

The  early  Church  was  a  school.  It  was  designed,  like 
the  synagogues  and  "assemblies"  of  the  Jews,  for  worship 
and  for  the  thorough  investigation  of  the  Holy  Scriptures; 
with  what  increase  of  opportunity  and  illumination  we  have 
already  seen.  Its  members  were  to  "  teach "  and  "  edify " 
each  other.  The  "  word  of  Christ  was  to  dwell  richly  "  among 
them.  They  were  to  grow  in  "  knowledge  "  as  well  as  in 
"  grace,"  (2  Pet.  iii,  IS  ;)  to  "  add  to  faith,  virtue,  and  to  virtue, 
knowledge"  (2  Pet.  i,  5;)  to  he  "strong"  and  ''overcome  the 
wicked  one,"  through  the  "  word  of  God  abiding  in  them." 
1  John  ii,  14.  In  order  to  this  there  were  "  diversities  of 
gifts,"  and  "differences  of  •administrations,*'  but  the  same 
Lord;  and  in  the  Church  "the  manifestation  of  the  Spirit  is 
given  to  every  man  to  profit  withal."  "All  these  worketh 
that  one  and  the  self-same  Spirit,  dividing  to  every  man  *ev- 


1869.]  The  Church  School.  205 

erally  as  he  will.  For  as  the  body  is  one,  and  hath  many 
members,  and  all. the  members  of  that  one  body,  being  many, 
are  one  body:  so  also  •  is  Christ."  The  excellent  William 
Arthur,  in  speaking  of  the  divers  gifts  of  the  Spirit,  says, 
"Spiritual  office  and  spiritual  gifts  vary  greatly  in  degree, 
honor,  and  authority,  and  he  who  has  the  less  ought  to  rev- 
erence him  who  has  the  greater,  remembering  who  it  is  that 
dispenses  them;  but  the  greater  should  never  attempt  to  ex- 
tinguish the  less,  and  to  reduce  the  exercise  of  spiritual  gifts 
within  the  limits  of  the  public  and  ordained  ministry.  To  do 
so  is  to  depart  from  spiritual  Christianity."  We  have  little 
doubt  that  the  "teachers"  referred  to  by  the  Apostle  were  a 
class  of  persons  who  gave  special  attention  to  this  department 
of  instruction,  and  aided  the  regular  ministry  in  the  edification 
of  the  Church.* 

The  work  thus  contemplated  and  performed  by  the  early 
Church — the  work  of  edification  through  the  truth,  taught  in 
the  most  thorough  and  effective  way  by  persons  appointed  for 
that  purpose — remains  to  be  carried  on,  and  by  similar  modes, 

*  A  pastor  was  a  teacher,  although  every  teacher  might  not  be  a  pastor ;  but, 
in  many  cases,  be  confined  to  the  office  of  subordinate  instruction,  whether  as  an 
expounder  of  doctrine,  a  catechi.st,  or  even  a  more  private  instructor  of  those  who 
as  yet  were  unacquainted  with  the  first  principles  of  the  Gospel  of  Christ." — Dr.  A. 
Stevens. 

"  No  system  can  be  made  to  accord  with  this  passage,  [Eph.  iv,  16,]  any  more 
than  with  the  general  spirit  of  the  2sTew  Testament,  wherein  the  pulpit  is  the  sole 
provision  for  instruction,  admonition,  and  exhortation;  the  great  bulk  of  the 
members  of  the  Cliurch  being  merely  recipients,  each  living  a  stranger  to  the 
spiritual  concerns  of  the  others,  and  no  '  effectual  working '  of  every  joint  and 
every  part  for  mutual  strengthening  being  looked  for.  It  is  not  enough  that 
arrangements  to  promote  mutual  edification  be  permitted,  at  the  discretion  of  indi- 
vidual pa&tora  or  officers;  means  of  grace  wherein  fellow-Cliristians  shall  on 
set  purpose  have  'fellowship'  one  with  another,  'speak  often  one  to  another, 
exhort  one  another,  confess  their  faults  one  to  another,'  and  '  pray  one  for  another,' 
shall  teach  and  'admonish  one  another  in  psalms,  and  hymns,  and  spiritual  songs,' 
are  not  dispensable  appendages,  but  of  the  essenco  of  a  Church  of  Christ." — Iicv. 
William  Arthur. 

Benson  on  Rom.  xii,  8  :  "  '  He  that  teacheth  '  the  ignorant;  who  is  appointed  to 
instruct  the  catechumens  and  to  fit  them  for  the  communion  of  the  Church."  On 
Eph.  iv,  11,  the  same  writer  says:  "It  id  probable  the  peculiar  offico  of  those  here 
termed  teachers,  as  distinguished  from  those  called  pastors,  was  to  instruct  the- 
young  and  ignorant  in  the  first  principles  of  the  Christian  religion.  And  they 
likewise  were  doubtless  fitted  for  their  work  by  such  gifts  as  were  necessary  to 
the  right  discharging  thereof." 


206  The  Church  School.  [April, 

in  the  Church   to-day.     TVe  regard  the  Sunday-school  in  its 
highest  form  as  the  divine  method  for  reaching  this  end. 

1.  The  first  and  main  want  of  the  modern  Sunday-school  is 
the  Master's  presence.  The  spiritual  mission  of  the  institu- 
tion has  been  forgotten,  less  by  the  talkers  at  conventions,  than 
by  the  great  majority  of  teachers  who  never  attend  conven- 
tions. The  theory  of  the  few  outreaches  the  practice  of  the 
many.  We  have  reason  to  fear  that  there  are  many  teachers 
who  make  no  personal  religious  appeals  to  their  pupils,  who 
never  pray  with  them,  in  whose  classes  young  persons  have 
remained  for  years  without  a  knowledge  of  Christ,  without 
any  deep-wrought  convictions,  and  even  without  one  zealous 
effort  on  the  teacher's  part  for  their  conversion.  Such  classes 
and  such  schools  seem  to  lack  only  one  thing,  but  it  is  the 
one  thing  needful.  Enthusiasm,  numbers,  attractiveness,  and 
a  score  of  other  charms  they  may  possess,  but  O  !  where  is 
the  Master  ?  AYe  trace  this  lamentable  lack  to  the  indefinite, 
if  not  incorrect  theories  which  underlie  the  Sunday-school.  If 
what  we  build  be  a  breakwater  instead  of  a  light-house,  why 
be  surprised  that  no  rays  fall  upon  the  black  night  from  its 
summit?  If  the  Sunday-school  is  a  human,  subordinate,  tem- 
porary substitute,  independent  of  the  Church,  and  without 
divine  authority,  who  can  wonder  that  the  divine  co-operation 
has  not  been  sought  or  secured !  If  it  is  organized  merely  to 
hold  childhood  until  the  Church  itself  should  come  with  di- 
viner powers,  we  need  not  measure  its  worth  by  any  spiritual 
result ;  and  may  expect  that  in  the  zeal  to  perfect  its  organiza- 
tion, display  its  drill  in  music,  martial  movement,  and  Biblical 
scholarship,  it  will  too  often  forget  to  pass  its  pupils  over  to 
the  Church,  and  not  infrequently  alienate  them  from  it.  But 
the  school  is  more  than  this  theory  allows,  and  it  needs  first 
and  always  the  Divine  co-operation.  No  degree  of  conven- 
ience and  elegance  in  architectural  arrangements,  no  com- 
pleteness in  appointments,  no  precision  and  harmony  of  move- 
ment in  discipline,  no  thoroughness  in  intellectual  training,  no 
impressive  proprieties  in  devotional  service,  no  ingenious 
illustrations  from  the  superintendent's  desk  or  blackboard,  no 
eloquence  in  occasional  addresses, — none  of  theso  things  can 
compensate  for  the  absence  of  the  "power"  which  the  Holy 
Ghost  alone  imparts.     The  Master's  presence  is  indispensable, 


1869J  The  Church  School.  207 

for  ours  is  the  school  of  Christ.  We  certainly  need  the  Spirit 
in  the  school  of  the  Word,  because  the  Word  is  "  the  sword  of 
the  Spirit." 

2.  Xext  to  the  Master's  presence  the  modern  Sunday-school 
craves  ecclesiastical  recognition  as  a  mea7is  of  grace.  The 
Methodist  Church  owes  more  than  she  can  estimate  to  her 
system  of  class  meetings.  By  this  she  has  maintained  a  per- 
manent pastorate  in  connection  with  the  itinerancy.  The 
Class  Leaders  are  the  Pastor's  assistants  —  Subpastors.  We 
have  often  asked,  Why  may  not  the  groupings  or  classes  of  the 
Sunday-school  be  incorporated  iu  the  arrangements  of  the 
Church  ?  Thus  we  should  secure  unity  of  plan,  and  at  the  same 
time  increase  the  number  of  the  Pastor's  authorized  helpers. 
Are  the  objects  and  appropriate  methods  of  the  Church  and 
school  classes  so  diverse  as  to  render  this  impracticable  ?  The 
Church  class  seeks  the  advancement  of  each  believer  in  the 
divine  life;  it  encourages  the  free  expression  of  his  convictions, 
needs,  and  attainments  ;  it  rebukes,  exhorts,  admonishes,  and 
instructs,  building  him  up  in  Christian  knowledge  and  purity. 
To  the  inquirer  it  is  the  Interpreter's  house,  where  many 
great  truths  are  for  the  first  time  explained  to  him.  ISTow 
precisely  what  the  Church-class  scholar  needs  our  Sunday- 
school  scholar  needs  —  frank  conversation  about  the  way  of 
life,  admonition,  exhortation,  instruction,  and  encouragement 
— all  tending  to  growth  iu  grace.  We  claim  that  this  is  the 
true  object  of  the  Church  school.  It  is  a  spiritual,  not  an 
intellectual  gymnasium.  It  strikes  at  the  heart.  Alas !  that 
we  have  so  few  such  schools.  Our  most  approved  teachers 
have  inquired  more  after  method  than  after  power.  To  recite 
well  every  Sabbath,  and  not  so  much  to  live  near  to  Christ, 
and  work  for  Christ  every  day,  has  been  the  great  aim  of 
many  of  our  most  celebrated  schools.  We  would  fain  impress 
pastors,  teachers,  superintendents,  and  scholars  with  the  fact 
that  the  Sunday-school  is  designed  to  strengthen  religious 
character  and  experience;  and  that  what  the  faithful  class 
leader  would  do  for  his  class  member,  the  faithful  Sunday- 
school  teacher  should  do  for  his  scholar.  u  But  all  Sunday 
scholars  are  not  Church  members."  Full  members  by  faith 
and  baptism,  alas !  no ;  perhaps  not  even  probationers  or 
seekers.     We  have  not  been  working  for  this.     We  have  not 


208  TJie  Church  School.  [April, 

informed  our  pupils  upon  their  admission  to  the  school  that 
we  could  not  do  our  best  work  for  them  until  they  had  given 
themselves  to  Christ  And  we  fear  that  a  large  majority  of 
the  Sunday-school  scholars  are  unconverted.  Though  not 
"  full  members,"  "  probationers,"  or  "seekers,"  do  these  scholars 
sustain  no  relation  to  the  Church  ?  "  Baptized  members  from 
infancy,  perhaps."  But  for  them  we  organize  Church  classes. 
Are  all  other  scholars  outside  of  the  Church,  in  such  a  sense 
as  to  render  the  class  arrangement  inappropriate  and  unprofit- 
able ?  We  hold  them  by  parental  authority,  and  generally  by 
their  own  consent,  and  we  claim,  that  as  candidates  for  bap- 
tism— "  catechumens  "  like  those  of  old — they  are  in  some  sense 
connected  with  the  Church.  They  walk  at  least  in  the  outer 
courts,  and  we  may  more  easily  than  we  think  (because  Christ 
is  with  us)  lead  them  up  through  the  gate  Beautiful  into  the 
higher  courts  of  the  Lord's  house.  These  catechumens  need 
the  pastoral  and  subpastoral  care.  By  virtue  of  their  relation 
to  the  Church  through  the  families  to  which  they  belong,  we 
are  directed  in  the  Discipline  to  visit  and  instruct  them. 
Shall  their  voluntary  relation  to  the  school  of  the  Church 
grant  us  no  similar  or  superior  advantages?  We  think  that 
such  interest  in  them,  and  such  ecclesiastical  relations  guar- 
anteed them,  would  exalt  their  view  of  the  Church,  and  make 
them  eager  to  enter  her  higher  fellowships. 

"But  would  you  turn  the  exercises  of  a  Sunday-school  class  into 
those  of  a  Church  class?"  We  should  unquestionably  correct 
the  one-sided  methods  of  each  by  a  blending  of  their  respect- 
ive characteristics.  To  the  study  of  Scripture  truth  (the  chief 
thing  in  the  best  Sunday-school  classes  as  now  conducted)  we 
should  add  the  element  of  personal  experience,  (the  main 
thing  in  the  Church  class.)  The  ever-present  aim  of  the  Sun- 
day-school teacher  should  be  the  spiritual  profit  of  his  scholars. 
The  frankest  expression  of  their  religious  doubts  and  desires 
should  be  encouraged.  Every  lesson  should  be  examined  with 
a  view  to  the  edification  of  each  pupil.  And  if  the  Church 
class  leader  should  follow  the  Sunday-school  teacher's  example 
and  introduce  more  of  the  divine  Word  into  the  exercises  of 
his  weekly  meeting,  we  are  confident  that  an  element  of  in- 
terest and  strength  would  be  imparted  to  the  service.  Truth 
is  the  sword  of  the  Spirit ;  truth  is  the  wire  through  which 


1869J  The  Church  School.  209 

the  celestial  currents  sweep.      Father  Keeves,  the  matchless 
Class  Leader  of  Lambeth,  knew  the  value  of  the  Bible,  and  was 
never  satisfied  "until  each  member  could  for  himself  prove 
from  Scripture  every  doctrine  he  professed,  and  quote  from 
Scripture  the  warrant  for  each  promise,  on  the  fulfillment  of 
which  he  relied."     He  used  occasionally  to  devote  an  entire 
session  of  his  class  to  the  study  of  a  Scripture  lesson,  as  a  Bible 
class  would.     When  men  of  middle  age,  and  old  men  who  did 
not  know  how  to  read,  were  brought  into  his  class  he  taught 
them.     "And,"  said  he,  "we  set  apart  a  Sunday  for  them  to 
read  a  portion  of  Holy  Scripture  to  us,  to  hear  how  they  im- 
prove, and  to  stimulate  others  to  learn."  *     Can  we  forget 
the  "  Holy  Club  "  at  Oxford,  with  their  week  evening  meet- 
ings for  reading  the  Greek  Testament  and  the  ancient  classics, 
and  on  Sunday  evenings  their  studies  in  divinity  %      "  They 
built  me  up  daily,"  says  George  Whitefield,  "  in  the  knowl- 
edge and  fear  of  God,  and  taught  me  to  endure^  hardness  as  a 
good  soldier  of  Jesus  Christ."     We  say,  then,  let  us  make  the 
Church-class  a  Bible  school  for  spiritual  growth,  and  its  Leader 
a  teacher,  and  let   the  Sunday-school  class  become  a  Bible 
school  for  spiritual  growth,  and  its  teacher  a  leader.     This 
arrangement  will  not  interfere  with,  but  rather  benefit  the 
love-feasts  and  general  classes  of  the   Church,  increase  the 
thoughtfulness  and  stability  of  Christians,  render  the  preach- 
ing of  God's  word  a  greater  delight,  and  enable  us  to  retain 
in    the   Church    the   multitudes    of  young  people  who  now 
every  year  drop  out  of  our  schools  through  the  lack  of  Church 
sympathy,   adult   attendance,  intellectual  food,  and  spiritual 
influence. 

3.  The  next  most  urgent  demand  of  the  Sunday-school  is,  to 
be  met  by  earnest,  trained,  Christian  teachers.  We  would  not 
raise  an  impracticable  standard  here.  First  the  teacher  should 
have  a  general  knowledge  of  the  plan  of  salvation  ;  then,  that 


*  The  biographer  of  Father  Reeves,  after  reporting  his  method  of  conducting 
class,  says,  "  Rather  novel  this!  some  may  be  disposed  to  exclaim.  Yes;  hut  let 
them  that  say  so  think  again,  aud  they  will  acknowledge  it  undeniahly  good.  This 
excellent  Leader  would  uot  havo  his  members  satisfied  ualil  they  could  prove  from 
Scripture  the  soundness  of  their  faith,  and  until,  to  the  joy  of  their  souls,  they 
could  read  for  themselves  in  their  own  tongue  the  wonderful  works  of  God.  May 
6uch  Leaders  and  members  be  multiplied." 


210  The  Church  School.  f  April, 

experience  of  God's  grace  which,  makes  the  plan  precious  and 
real.  These  will  be  accompanied  by  a  love  for  the  "  word  of 
his  grace."  Then  lie  needs  the  will  to  wrest  time  enough 
from  the  world's  grasp  every  week  for  a  careful  preparation 
of  the  lesson  ;  love  enough  for  the  scholars  and  the  truth  to 
make  the  teacher  simple,  conversational,  and  straightforward 
in  bis  manner;  tact  to  draw  out  the  scholars'  own  thought, 
and  concentrate  their  attention  upon  the  one  central  truth  of 
the  lesson.  These  will  give  the  teacher,  under  the  divine  bless- 
ing, abundant  success.  After  this,  the  more  Biblical  and 
scientific  knowledge  the  teacher  has  the  better.  Mere  in- 
tellectual brilliancy  and  force,  without  heart  or  Christ — away 
with  them  !  and  away  with  all  lifeless  systems  of  teaching ! 
"We  love  system,  and  believe  in  thorough  analysis  in  order 
to  exhaustive  exegesis,  but  let  this  be  attended  to  in  the  study 
at  home.  In  the  class,  let  our  method  be  that  of  free  and 
wisely-directed  conversation,  arresting  the  attention  of  all, 
eliciting  the  opinions  and  experiences  of  each,  and  leadiug  to 
profitable  self-application. 

The  personal  character  of  the  teacher  is  of  paramount 
importance.  Piety  is  as  indispensable  here  as  in  the  Class 
Leader  and  Pastor.  The  teacher's  character  is  a  perpetual 
presence  with  the  scholar,  so  that  it  is  itself  a  constant 
teacher.  Through  his  influence  the  sown  seed  of  the  Sabbath 
is  growing  seven  days  in  productive  soil,  though  the  teacher 
"  knoweth  not  how."  Frivolity,  love  of  dress  and  pleasure,  care- 
lessness, indifference,  unkindness,  superficiality  and  vagueness 
in  teaching — these,  too,  are  seed,  and  they  drop  in  the  soil  and 
grow,  and  what  wonder  if  they  choke  the  seed  of  the  kingdom 
in  the  pupil's  soul  ?  . 

We  had  intended  to  offer  some  further  suggestions  upon 
several  phases  of  the  modern  Sunday-school  work.  The  leno-th 
to  which  we  have  carried  our  discussion  already,  prohibits 
this,  and  we  close  with  the  prayer  that  our  Pastors  may  be 
impressed  more  profoundly  with  the  importance  of  the  Church 
school  as  a  pastoral  agency,  as  a  means  of  edifying  adult 
Christians,  and  of  establishing  our  people,  old  and  youn"-,  in 
the  grace  and  knowledge  of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ. 


1869.]     Schleiermacher  •  his  Theology  and  Influence.        211 


Art.    m.— SCHLEIERMACHER  ;    HIS    THEOLOGY    AND 
INFLUENCE. 

A  CENTURY  ago  the  twenty-first  of  November  last  was  born 
in  Breslau,  Prussia,  Frederick  Daniel  Ernst  Schleiermacher  ; 
perhaps,  with  a  single  exception,  the  greatest  theological  genius 
of  the  Protestant  world. 

•  Schleiermacher  was  the  son  of  a  German  Reformed  minister, 
then  chaplain  of  a  Prussian  regiment  in  Silesia ;  his  mother 
was  the  daughter  of  Rev.  Mr.  Stubenrauch,  likewise  Reformed. 
As  his  father  was  often  absent  from  home  on  official  duties,  his 
early  training  devolved  almost  entirely  upon  his  mother,  who 
used  her  great  influence  very  skillfully  and  successfully,  so  as 
to  secure  her  son's  lasting  gratitude.  His  father  removed 
afterward  to  the  country,  and  young  Schleiermacher  stayed 
under  the  paternal  roof  up  to  Ins  fourteenth  year,  being  in- 
structed by  his  parents  and  by  a  private  teacher,  who  inspired  him 
with  enthusiasm  for  classical  literature.  At  this  early  period 
he  was  assailed  by  a  "  strange  skepticism,"  which  made  him 
doubt  the  genuineness  of  all  the  ancient  authors.  In  17S3  he 
was  sent  to  Niesky,  where  the  Moravians  had  an  excellent 
school,  and  two  years  later,  to  the  Moravian  college  at  Barby. 
A  spirit  of  child-like  piety  pervaded  these  schools,  instruction 
and  amusement  were  happily  blended,  and  these  influences 
impressed  him  most  happily  and  lastingly.  Even  at  this  early 
period  he  had  painful  doubts  as  to  the  nature  of  the  atonement 
and  the  eternity  of  the  punishment  of  the  wicked  ;  and  he  went 
to  work  so  independently,  that  a  rupture,  not  only  with  his  be- 
loved teachers,  but  also,  temporarily,  with  his  father,  was  the 
consequence.  In  1TS7  he  entered  the  University  at  Halle, 
where  he  attended  the  lectures  of  Semler  and  of  "Wolf,  the  great 
philologist,  mastered  the  modern  languages  and  mathematics, 
and  read  the  works  of  Spinoza,  Kant,  Fichte,  and  Jacobi. 
Although  his  mind  was  very  impressible,  yet  he  was  too  inde- 
pendent to  follow  any  one  master.  After  two  years  he  left  the 
university  without  any  iixed  system  of  religious  opinions,  yet 
with  the  hope  of  "  attaining  by  earnest  research  and  a  patient 
examination  of  all  the  witnesses,  to  a  reasonable  degree  of 


212        SchleiermacJier ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.    [April, 

certainty,  and  to  a  knowledge  of  the  boundaries  of  human 
science  and  learning."  In  1790  he  passed  his  examination  for 
licensure,  and  became  private  tutor  in  the  family  of  Count 
Dohna,  where  he  stayed  three  years,  and  received  his  first 
polish  in  intercourse  with  refined  and  noble-minded  women. 
In  1791  he  took  holy  orders,  and  became  assistant  of  his  uncle 
at  Landsberg ;  in  1796  he  was  appointed  chaplain  of  a  hospital 
in  Berlin,  where  he  stayed  till  1802.  During  these  six  years 
he  moved  mostly  in  cultivated  and  literary  circles,  and  identi- 
fied himself  with  the  so-called  romantic  school  of  poetry,  as 
represented  by  Frederick  and  August  Willi.  Schlegel,  Ticck, 
and  Xovalis.  This  connection  tended  to  elevate  his  taste  and 
to  stimulate  his  mind,  but  was  rather  unfavorable  to  a  hiph- 
toned  spirituality  and  moral  earnestness.  In  1S02  he  went  as 
court  preacher  to  Stolpe  in  Pomerania.  Here  he  commenced 
his  translation  of  Plato,  completed  in  six  volumes  from  1S01  to 
-1S26.  In  1S01  he  was  elected  extraordinary  professor  of  the- 
ology and  philosophy  in  Halle.  AVhen  this  university  was 
suspended  in  1S06  by  Xapoleon  he  went  first  to  Eiigen,  and 
then  to  Berlin  as  minister  of  Trinity  Church.  In  1809  he 
married  the  widow  of  his  friend  Willich,  and,  although  he  was 
much  older  than  she,  yet  it  proved  a  union  of  lasting  happi- 
ness. He  took  a  great  part  in  the  establishment  of  the  Berlin 
University  in  1S10,  became  its  first  professor  of  theology,  and 
spent  the  remainder  of  his  life  there  as  academical  teacher  and 
pastor  of  Trinity  Church.  He  lectured  two  hours  daily  on 
almost  every  branch  of  theology  and  philosophy,  and  was, 
with  his  former  pupil,  Ncander,  fur  over  twentv  years  the 
great  theological  luminary  and  point  of  attraction  of  Berlin. 
As  a  preacher  he  gathered  around  him  every  Sunday,  in 
Trinity  Church,  the  most  intelligent  audiences,  students,'  pro- 
fessors, officers,  and  persona  of  the  higher  ranks  of  society. 
Wilhelra  von  Humboldt  says,  that  Schleiermacher's  speaking 
far  exceeded  his  power  in  writing,  and  that  his  strength  con- 
sisted in  the  "deeply  primitive  character  of  his  words,  which 
were  five  from  art,  and  the  i^rsuasive  effusion  of  feeling,  mov- 
ing in  perfect  unison  with  one  of  the  rarest  of  intellects?"  He 
never  wrote  hi*  Bcnnon*,  except  the  text,  theme,  and '  a  few 
heads,  but  th.-y  were  taken  down  by  friends,  reviewed  by  him 
and  published.     Bo*idci  Ins  regular  duties  as  preacher  pro- 


1869.1     Schleiermacher ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.        213 

fessor,  and  member  of  the  Berlin  Academy  of  Sciences,  lie 
took  an  active  part  in  the  most  important  movements  of  his 
country  and  age.  During  the  most  critical  and  depressed 
period  in  the  history  of  Prussia  he  exerted  a  powerful  influ- 
ence in  the  pulpit,  in  the  chair,  and  through  the  press,  to  stir 
up  in  all  classes  that  pride  of  nationality  and  love  of  independ- 
ence which  resulted  in  the  war  of  liberation  and  the  final 
emancipation  of  Germany  from  French  usurpation.  He  ad- 
hered to  the  end  of  his  life  to  his  liberal  principles,  and 
exposed  himself  to  the  danger  of  being  exiled,  like  his  friends 
De  Wette  and  E.  M.  Arndt.  He  retained,  however,  his 
position,  received  even  the  order  of  the  Red  Eagle,  which, 
however,  he  never  wore,  and  never  enjoyed  nor  Bought  the 
personal  friendship  of  Frederick  William  III.  He  assisted  in 
the  work  of  the  union  of  the  Lutheran  and  Reformed  Confes- 
sions in  1817,  and  strongly  favored  the  introduction  of  the 
Presbyterian  and  synodieal  form  of  government.  He  assisted 
in  compiling  the  Berlin  hymn  book  in  1820,  which,  with  all 
its  defects,  opened  the  way  for  a  hymnological  reform,  which 
has  since  been  going  on  in  all  parts  of  Germany. 

Notwithstanding  this  extraordinary  activity,  he  mingled 
freely  in  society  and  was  the  center  of  attraction  in  a  large 
circle  of  friends  at  his  fireside.  He  was  small  of  stature,  and 
somewhat  humpbacked:  but  his  face  was  noble,  earnest, 
sharply  defined,  and  highly  expressive  of  intellect  and  kindly 
sympathy  ;  his  eye  was  piercing,  keen,  and  full  of  fire ;  all  his 
movements  were  quick  and  animated.  He  had  a  perfect 
command  over  his  temper,  and  never  lost  his  even  composure. 
In  the  beginning  of  February  1S31  he  contracted  a  cold, 
which  settled  on  his  lungs  and  terminated  his  life  in  a  few 
days.  His  death  filled  all  Germany  with  gloom ;  it  was  uni- 
versally felt  that  a  representative  man,  and  a  great  luminary 
of  the  age,  had  fallen.  A  complete  collection  of  his  works  has 
been  in  the  course  of  publication  ever  since  1S35.  His  pro- 
ductions embrace  classical  philology,  philosophical  ethics,  dia- 
lectics, psychology,  politics,  pedagogics,  Church  history,  hermc- 
ncutics,  Christian  ethics,  dogmatics,  practical  theology,  sermons, 
and  a  large  number  of  philosophical,  exegetica),  and  critical 
essays.  These  are  a  few  meager  outlines  as  to  the  man 
Schleiermacher.      We  must  next  review  Schleiermacher   the 

Fouktu  Sekies,  Vol.  XXI.— 14 


214        Schleiermacher  ;  Ms  Theology  and  Influence.    [April, 

theologian,  the  regenerator  of  German  theology,  of  German 
religious  thinking,  the  father  of  modern  orthodox  theology. 
In  sketching  him  in  this  capacity  we  shall  mainly  follow 
Dorner  in  his  admirable  recent  work,  History  of  Protestant 
Theology,  not  yet  translated  into  English,  and  noticed  in  a 
rather  unsatisfactory  manner  in  several  of  our  Reviews. 

In  order  to  understand  Schleiermacher  himself,  the  develop- 
ment of  his  theological  consciousness,  and  the  unbounded 
influence  which  he  has  heretofore,  exerted,  it  is  necessary  to 
take  into  account  not  only  the  state  of  religious  thinking  in 
Germany  in  the  days  of  Schleiermacher's  first  appearance  in 
public,  but  also  that  feature  of  the  German  mind  which  is  so 
reluctant  to  receive  any  thing  on  mere  authority,  but  which 
prefers  rather  to  investigate  it  fundamentally,  to  study  both 
its  nature  and  beginning,  before  forming  a  lasting  opinion ;  a 
peculiarity  which,  of  course,  is  liable  to  abuse,  and  exposes 
the  German  mind  to  the  charge  of  skepticism  by  other  na- 
tions, but  which  we,  notwithstanding,  look  upon  as  the  con- 
ditio sin?  qua  non  of  all  thoroughness  and  real  science. 
Hence  the  attempts  at  Ontology,  the  very  being  and  nature 
of  God'  of  the  Spirit,  and  Theogonies,  etc.  ;  subjects  which 
many  good  people  take  on  trust,  but  on  which  they  have, 
perhaps,  for  this  very  reason,  no  idea  whatever — God,  Spirit, 
being  to  them  mere  terms  or  abstractions. 

In  theology  Supernaturalism  had,  after  a  protracted  struggle, 
yielded  to  Rationalism,  as  it  had  partially  yielded  in  England  to 
Deism.  A  cold,  lifeless  preaching  of  morality  had  emptied 
the  churches,  Kant's  stern  imperative,  Thou  shalt,  had,  after  a 
temporary  effect,  been  superseded  by  Schelling's  physical. and 
Hegel's  logical  Pantheism,  and  the  people  had  lost  all  interest 
not  only  in  Christianity,  but  in  all  religion  as  such.  In  this 
6tate  of  things  Schleiermacher  appeared  on  the  stage  himself,  as 
a  matter  of  course,  affected  and  shaped  by  the  spirit  of  the  times. 
In  1799  he  published  his  "Discourses  on  Peligion,  addressed 
to  the  Educated  Men  among  its  Dcspisers."  In  these  discourses 
he  does  not  appear  as  a  specifically  Christian  preacher,  but  as 
an  eloquent  priest  of  Natural  Iveligiou  in  the  outer  courts  of 
Christian  Kevelation,  to  convince  educated  unbelievers  that 
religion,  so  far  from  being  incompatible  with  intellectual  cult- 
ure, as  they  thought,  is  the  deepest  and  most  universal  want  of 


1869.]     Schleicrmachcr ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.         215 

man,  being  different  from  knowledge  and  from  practice,  a  sacred 
feeling  of  relation  to  the  Infinite,  which  purities  and  ennobles 
all  the  faculties.  Beyond  this  he  did  not  go  at  that  time. 
But,  says  Dorner,  in  order  to  understand  the  man,  we  must 
examine  his  theological  stand-point.  Here  his  principal  merit 
and  his  real  importance  for  the  history  of  theology  lie.  Schleier- 
macher  overcame  the  antagonism  between  Supematuralism 
and  Rationalism,  which  prevailed  up  to  1820,  in  principle;  a 
deed  of  science,  which  was  performed,  not  by  uniting  elecii- 
cally  the  elements  of  truth  peculiar  to  each  of  the  two  systems, 
but  by  uniting  the  truths  contained  in  both  by  a  principle  higher 
than  both  systems  into  a  new  system. 

This  principle  is  Schleicrmacher's  idea  of  religion  as  a  quick- 
ening principle ;  whereas  religion  is,  as  is  well  known,  accord- 
ing to  the  two  systems,  merely  a  function  of  the  \oill  and  the 
intellect,  a  modus  cognoscendi  et  eolendi  Deum,  (the  manner 
of  knowing  and  worshiping  God,)  an  essentially  Deistical 
notion  of  God  prevailing.  In  Rationalism  inheres  a  longing 
for  personal  persuasion  and  mental  appropriation  of  truth 
instead  of  a  blind  submission  to  mere  outward  authority,  for 
which  reason  it  keeps  its  look  steadily  fixed  upon  an  indissolu- 
ble connection  between  the  natural  and  the  ethical  world. 
This  is  the  truth  in  Rationalism.  Supematuralism  takes  it  for 
granted  that  man  is  insufficient  to  himself,  in  his  highest  rela 
tions,  and  in  want  of  divine  assistance ;  or,  that  Christianity 
is  not  a  product  of  nature,  Christ  not  the  natural  offspring  of 
the  race,  but  a  supernatural  phenomenon.  This  is  the  truth  in 
Supematuralism.  These  two  elemeuts  of  partial  truth  inhering 
in  the  two  systems — liberty  and  authority,  personal  appropria- 
tion and  tradition,  the  ideal  and  the  historical — Schleiermacher 
unites  by  falling  back  upon  the  fundamental  idea  of  the  Ref- 
ormation— upon  religion  or  faith  in  the  evangelical  sense  of 
the  term.  Of  this  faith,  the  quickening  material  principle  of 
the  evangelical  Church,  he  vindicates  the  rights — its  independ- 
ence and  inward  certainty — in  distinction  from  a  mere  historical 
belief,  as  from  mere  convictions  resting  on  thinking  and  conclu- 
sions. This  faith  is  to  Schleiermacher  what  it  was  to  the 
divines  of  the  Reformation — a  fides  divina,  something  essen- 
tially divine;  a  restoration  of  a  common  life  between  God  and 
man,  produced  by  the  spiritual  contemplation  of  the  historical 


216      Schlezermacher  /  his  Theology  and  Influence.       [April, 

image  of  Christ  and  its  power  of  attraction.  This  faith,  giving 
itself  up  to  the  Redeemer,  partakes  thereby  of  his  spirit  and 
life,  and  secures  to  its  possessor  both  the  consciousness  of  being 
redeemed  and  of  the  power  inhering  in  Jesus  to  redeem.  This 
process,  viewed  from  the  stand-point  of  natural  and  redeemable 
life,  is  supernatural,  a  miracle  ;  but  viewed  from  the  stand-point 
of  the  Church,  which  was  founded  by  Christ  and  necessarily 
partakes  of  his  spirit,  it  is  merely  a  continuation  of  that, 
which  has  become  normal  in  history,  has  been  intended  for 
mankind  from  all  eternity,  and  belongs  to  the  idea  of  humanity, 
since  it  completes  its  creation.  As  to  the  beginning  of  the 
Church  and  of  the  person  of  Christ,  therefore,  the  superrational 
or  supernatural  is  at  the  same  time  rational  and  natural  when 
viewed  from  the  stand-point  of  God  and  his  eternal  decree, 
which  comprehends  all  tilings  and  pre-arranged  man's  redemp- 
tion according  to  his  wants.  For  the  spiritual  element  in  man, 
the  vovg,  (in  Scripture  language  it  is  the  heart,)  although  it 
forms,  as  the  koyticov,  his  center — of  which  every  thing  else  is  the 
periphery — is  in  his  natural  state  so  powerless,  and  by  the  sen- 
sual element,  the  ifoxfl  and  the  ow/ja,  so  completely  controlled, 
that  the  Scripture,  correctly  calls  the  vovg,  in  this  condition, 
flesh.  But  on  the  other  hand  it  is,  nevertheless,  the  vovg  with 
which  the  divine  spirit,  irvevfia3  unites,  in  order  to  bring  from 
this  center  the  whole  psychical  and  bodily  organism  under  its 
influence  a-nd  control.  It  must,  therefore,  be  taught  that  the 
appropriation  of  Christianity  presupposes  an  antecedent  relation 
to  Christ ;  that  is,  an  inward  longing  of  human  nature  for  Christ, 
which  is  developed  into  a  live  reciprocity,  and  satisfied  by  the 
actual  presentation  of  Christ's  image.  On  the  one  hand,  the 
human  vovg  is  not  the  Christian  -rrvevfia,  being  unable,  without 
Christ,  to  raise  its  reciprocity  to  spontaneity,  and  the  Christian 
spirit  is  not  even  potentially  included  in  the  human  spirit. 
This  is  the  truth  in  Supematuralism  over  against  Pelagianism. 
But  on  the  other  hand  we  must  say,  because  of  the  world's 
unity  and  the  continuity  of  the  ethical  process,  the  unity  of  the 
human  and  of  the  Christian  spirit  is  involved  in  the  longing  of 
the  first  for  the  second,  which  longing  can,  indeed,  not  be 
satisfied  by  its  own  strength,  but  only  through  the  appearance 
of  Christ.  Rationalism  is  wrong  in  saying  that  the  spirit  of 
Christ  was  nothing  but  the  human  spirit  in  a  higher  state  of 


1SG0.1     Schl-eiermacher ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.         217 

development,  since  the  human  spirit  could  by  no  process  be 
developed  into  that  of  Christ,  with  which  it  was,  however,  in 
so  far  one  as  it  had  an  everlasting  longing  for  it. 

What  we  call  the  spirit  of  Christ  or  the  Christian  spirit, 
and  the  human  spirit,  are  complements  of  each  other,  and  we 
must  allow  a  certain  original  identity  of  both.  Reason  is  intel- 
ligible only  as  a  transition  from  the  other  intellectual  functions 
of  man  to  the  divine  principle  manifested  in  Christ,  while  the 
•nvevfta  is  only  a  higher  development  of  what  we  call  reason, 
which  development  is,  however,  not  the  outgrowth  of  reason. 
Christianity,  however  different  from  limited  human  reason,  is 
supremely  rational ;  a  manifestation  of  divine  wisdom,  which  is 
reason,  and  it  is,  therefore,  no  contradiction  to  say  that  Chris- 
tianity is  superrational,  since  it  can  absolutely  not  be  the  pro- 
duct of  human  reason,  and  that  it  is,  at  the  same  time,  for  the 
reason  which  it  raises  from  the  condition  of  longing  to  that  of 
possession. 

As  the  antagonism  of  the  rational  and  supernatural,  so 
is  also  that  of  nature  and  grace. 

By  nature  is  meant  what  the  human  spirit  can  be  developed 
into,  considered  both  by  itself  and  in  connection  with  the  other 
functions  of  the  mind ;  the  appearance  of  Christ,  and  the  com- 
munication of  the  T:vev[m  bused  on  it,  is  grace.  If  this  is  so, 
there  is  no  absolute  antagonism  between  nature  and  grace, 
since  both  are  adapted  to  and  exist  for  each  other.  Naturalism 
says,  indeed,  the  development  of  man  through  grace  and  his 
natural  development  are  one  and  the  same  process ;  Super- 
naturalism  says,  man's  natural  development  through  his  reason 
is  essentially  different  from  his  development  through  grace. 
But  this  contradiction  appears  only  as  a  relative  one  when 
viewed  from  a  higher  stand-point.  Supernaturalism  is  right  in 
its  position  when  the  subject  is  considered  from  the  stand-point 
of  what  a  man  can  do  and  actually  does;  for  considered  in 
this  light,  that  which  is  contained  in  Christianity  goes  far 
beyond  nature,  and  is  suj/ernatural ;  and  by  no  development  of 
reason  could  that  which  is  in  Christ  and  is  imparted  to  human 
nature  through  faith,  have  been  produced  without  the  workings 
of  the  divine  principle  manifested  in  Christ.  But  Super- 
naturalism  is  wrong  in  saying  that  Christ's  appearance  is 
absolutely  supernatural,  that  is,  in  relation  to  God  and  God's 


218        SchMermacher  ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.     [April, 

idea  of  man  ;  and  Rationalism  is  right  in  saying  that,  con- 
sidered from  the  unity  of  the  divine  decree,  the  supernatural- 
ness  of  the  appearance  of  Christ  becomes  natural,  since  thin<rs 
that  appear  to  our  final  conception  as  different  are  necessarily 
one  in  the  divine  mind.  Viewed  in  this  light,  the  decree  of 
creation  cannot  be  separated  from  that  of  redemption  and  final 
completion.  Both  decrees  are  for  the  Divine  Being  equally 
natural  and  coexistent,  and  there  can  be  no  decree  of  redemp- 
tion and  final  completion  apart  from  that  of  creation,  which 
can  be  completed  only  by  the  decree  that  includes  Christ,  and 
must,  therefore,  be  considered  as  susceptible  of  Christ's  redeem- 
ing and  completing  power  from  the  beginning. 

Sehleiermacher's  view  is,  indeed,  not  free  from  determinism, 
including,  as  it  does,  also  moral  evil  in  God's  decree;  but  the 
point  under  consideration  here  cannot  be  affected  thereby,  be- 
cause the  absolute  oneness  of  the  divine  decree,  the  indissolu- 
bility of  these  two  elements — creation  and  redemption — cannot 
be  annulled  by  the  fact  that  the  fall  is  the  free  act  of  man,  be- 
cause the  idea  that  God  had  not.  foreseen  sin,  that  sin  had,  as 
it  were,  taken  him  by  surprise,  is  simply  absurd.  Schleier- 
macher  is  correct  in  saying  that  nature  is  merely  the  accom- 
plishment or  realization  of  the  divine  decrees  in  time  and  space ; 
but  by  this  very  position  a  higher  view  of  nature  is  absolutely 
demanded  than  that  held  by  Pelagian  ism  and  Rationalism— that 
is,  a  view  in  which  there  is  involved  the  appearance  of  Christ 
itself  in  such  a  manner  that  it  cannot  be  traced  from  'human 
reason  nor  from  the  intrinsic  power  of  the  race,  but  must  be 
ascribed  to  an  extraordinary  interference  of  God  to  a  divine 
act,  which  act,  however,  becomes  a  unity  with"  the  decree  of 
creation  in  the  divine  decree,  whose  expression  is  the  universe. 

By  faith  in  Jesus  Clni.-t  wc  partake  of  his  sinlessness  and 
blessedness,  are  saved  from  our  condition  of  sin  and  guilt,  and 
that  in  such  a  manner  that  we  are  conscious  of  it.  "We  are 
reconciled  unto  God,  who  beholds  us  in  him  as  animated  by 
his  spirit,  and  as  parts  of  liim  ;  lie  having  implanted,  at  least,  the 
principle  of  divine  lit*.-  into  the  Church,  the  portion  of  mankind 
in  union  with  him,  which  in  turn,  by  means  of  the  true  image 
of  Christ  impressed  into  itself,  propagates  this  life  until  the 
Church  ami  mankind  shall  have  become  coextensive  and  iden- 
tical.    All  religious,  that  is,  forms  of  religion,  must  finally  be 


18C9.3      Schleierrnacher ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.  219 

merged  in  Christianity.  The  essence  of  the  Christian  religion, 
however,  consists  in  the  redemption  through  Jesus  of  Nazareth, 
which  is  destined  to  be  the  all-pervading  power  of  the  Chris- 
tian's life,  and  is  the  highest  and  purest  form  of  attainable 
God-consciousness.  In  this  definition  of  Christianity,  con- 
taining two  ideas,  namely,  that  of  human  redemption  and  that 
of  the  person  of  Christ,  the  Church  is  carefully  distinguished 
from  every  thing  not  Christian.  The  idea  of  human  redemp- 
tion would  be  nothing  if  humanity  could  save  itself  without 
Christ;  or  if,  on  the  other  hand,  humanity  was  irredeemable. 
The  first  would  be  Pelagian,  the  second  Manichean,  heresy,  and 
redemption  would  either  be  superfluous  or  impossible.  The 
Christian  idea  of  the  person  of  the  Redeemer  absolutely  re- 
quires the  recognition  of  the  presence  of  full  redeeming  powers 
in  him.  But  if  even  his  unique  character  is  recognized,  but 
his  humanity  proper  denied,  as  is  done  by  Doketism,  it  is  im- 
possible for  him  to  affect  humanity  organically,  and  he  cannot 
be  its  Redeemer.  Again,  if  his  humanity  proper  is  recognized, 
but  that  absolutely  perfect  indwelling  of  God  in  him  denied, 
from  which  his  all-sufficient  power  to  redeem  proceeds, — if  he  is 
taken  to  be  an  extraordinary  man  without  a  specific  dignity, 
as  is  done  by  Ebionitism, — he  cannot  be  the  Redeemer.  But 
all  Christological  views  that  keep  within  these  two  extremes 
are,  according  to  Schleierrnacher,  Christian ;  and  if  they  need 
any  correction,  the  very  recognition  of  these  limits  furnishes  it. 
In  the  Redeemer,  who  is  to  Schleierrnacher  the  center  of  every 
thing  Christian,  he  sees  the  idea  of  humanity  realized,  the  ideal 
man  actualized  ;  the  God-consciousness  has  acquired  in  him  ab- 
solute^ strength,  has  become  a  personal  indwelling  of  God  in 
him,  as  far  as  human  nature  is  capable  of  such  an  indwelling. 
In  Jesus  God  has  revealed  himself  not  only  as  the  Omnipotent, 
Holy,  and  Just,  but  also  as  Love  and  Wisdom,  and  a  higher 
revelation  is  not  necessary  nor  to  be  looked  for ;  because  the  be- 
liever in  Jesus  knows  that  he  partakes  of  a  principle  that  is 
sufficient  fur  his  final  completion,  because  every  thing  that  hin- 
ders or  disturbs  this  process  is  not  based  on  this  principle,  but 
is  opposed  to  it.  If  it  be  said  that  the  realization  of  ideal  perfec- 
tion in  Christ  must  be  problematical,  or  that  it  is  impossible  that 
the  idea  of  perfection,  even  if  apprehended,  should  be  a  guar- 
antee of  its  realization,  or,  on  the  other  hand,  that  the  actual- 


220        Schleiermacher ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.     [April, 

ized  idea  as  beheld  in  Christ  docs  not  prove  total  purity  and 
perfection,  Schleiermachcr  answers  :  The  impossibility  of  real- 
izing absolute  perfection  is  the  impossibility  of  realizing  our 
moral  destination,  and  would  be  a  combination  of  Manieheism 
and  Ebionitism.  If  it  must  be  admitted,  therefore,  that  the 
ideal  humanity  has  been  realized  in  Christ,  the  reply  to  the 
assertion  that  the  actual  realization  of  the  ideal  cannot  be 
known  to  a  certainty  is  this :  Whoever  surrenders  himself  in  a 
feeling  of  his  need  of  redemption  wholly  to  the  influence  of 
Christ,  becomes  infallibly  certain  of  his  redeeming  character 
and  specific  dignity. 

A  real  appreciation  of  Christ's  image  is  possible  only  through 
true  faith,  which  secures  also  a  participation  in  his  supreme 
blessedness  and  sinless  perfection.  Christ  secures  these  bless- 
ings to  us  in  his  threefold  office  of  King,  Prophet,  and  High 
Priest.  Schleiermacher  lays  special  stress  on  Christ's  high 
priestly  office,  on  his  active  and  passive  obedience,  and  repre- 
sents him  as  full  of  high  priestly  sympathy,  taking  our  place 
in  order  to  raise  us  to  himself  and  to  make  us  his  own.  God 
looks  upon  those  that  are  in  this  life-communion  with  the 
Saviour  in  and  through  Christ  as  redeemed,  and  as  parts  of 
Christ  himself,  since  they  are  partakers  of  his  spirit.  From 
this  stand-point  the  snpernaturalistic  evidences  of  the  divinitv 
of  Christ,  miracles,  prophecies,  and  inspiration  appear  to  him 
as  weak,  and  the  fear  of  criticism  as  -weakly  and  nn evangeli- 
cal, proceeding,  as  it  does,  from  a  want  of  confidence  in  the 
peculiar  power  of  Christianity  to  prove  its  divinity  to  the  hu- 
man spirit  by  its  own  essence,  and  relying,  as  it  docs,  on  intel- 
lectual proof  which  can  never  afford  perfect  certainty.  From 
this  central  position,  which  Schleiermacher  assigns  to  faith, 
standing  on  the  real  basis  of  the  Reformation,  he  is  obliged  to, 
and  does,  distinguish  betvreenfaith  and  dogma,  which  are  so  often 
taken  for  each  other,  especially  by  the  intellectnalism,  even  the 
supernatural  one,  according  to  which  faith  is  the  receivino-  of 
the  supernaturally  revealed  doctrine,  that'is,  of  the  mvsteries  of 
Christianity.  But  doctrine  is  neither  redemption  nor  power  of 
redemption;  we  arc  destined  to  a  real  communion  with  God 
through  Christ,  and  only  where  this  life-eommunion  is,  there  is 
real  piety;  tins  involves  more  than  a  change  of  views  or  max- 
ims of  life.     Doctrine,  as  evangelical  preaching,  without  which 


1SG9J     Schleiermacher  •  his  Theology  and  Influence.        221 

there  can  originate  no  faith,  is,  according  to  Schleiermacher, 
indeed  also  independent  of  faith  ;  but  this  doctrine  is  different 
from  the  dogma,  is  very  simple,  and  has  its  power  in  the 
preaching  of  Christ,  in  the  truthful  and  quickening  presenta- 
tion of  his  image.  Genetically  considered,  the  dogma  is  the 
result  of  faith,  is  the  scientific  expression  of  the  kind  of  appro- 
priation of  the  Gospel  story  by  the  Church  for  the  time  being, 
and  has  its  origin  in  the  reflection  upon  the  conditions  of  the 
Christian  mind.  Being  dependent  upon  these  it  is  not  un- 
changeable, like  the  preaching  of  the  Gospel ;  has  not  the  con- 
sistency and  uniformity  of  the  writings  of  the  New  Testament, 
which  possess  normative  authority  'as  the  depository  of  the 
pure  primitive  Christian  tradition,  or  as  the  authentic  record 
of  revelation.  From  this  it  appears  that  Schleiermacher  as- 
signs to  the  Church  and  to  tradition  a  higher  place  than  was 
done  before  him  in  the  evangelical  Church.  He  draws,  indeed, 
this  distinction  between  the  Roman  Catholic  and  the  Protest- 
ant Church,  namely :  In  the  Catholic  Church  the  relation  of 
the  individual  believer  to  Christ  is  dependent  upon  his  relation 
to  the  Church,  while  in  the  Protestant  Church  the  individual 
believer's  relation  to  the  Church  is  dependent  upon  his  rela- 
tion to  Christ.  But  it  is  not  his  intention  to  deny,  by  this  dis- 
tinction, that  the  individual  attains  to  faith  only  through  the 
Church  and  her  offices  ;  yea,  he  even  says  that  the  Church  com- 
municates the  Holy  Spirit  to  the  individual,  denying  every  op- 
eration of  the  Spirit  not.  mediated  by  the  Church.  Necessary 
ingredients  and  constituent  elements  of  the  Church,  however, 
are,  according  to  Schleiermacher,  the  Holy  Scriptures,  which 
she  preserves,  and  the  sacraments,  which  she  administers,  and 
the  Holy  Spirit,  attending  her  efforts.  That  the  Holy  Spirit  is 
confined  to  the  Church,  or  even  to  certain  institutions,  that 
what  the  actual  Church  does,  is  also  the  work  of  the  Holy 
Spirit,  Schleiermacher  unqualifiedly  denies.  But  in  order  to 
conceive  of  Christianity  as  a  historic  power  he  has  assigned 
an  important  place  to  tradition  ;  not  to  tradition,  however,  in 
its  common  acceptation,  as  the  summary  of  a  well-defined 
number  of  views  and  doctrines,  but  as  a  living  power,  proceed- 
ing from  Christ  and  ever  present  in  the  Church  from  her  very 
origin;  and  his  ideas  have  not  failed  to  impress  the  Catholic 
Church  and  some  of  her  most  eminent  theologians,  as  Drey, 


222        Schleicrmacher  ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.     [April, 

Mohler,  Klee,  Staudenmaier,  and  others,  powerfully.  The 
Church,  as  the  work  of  Christ  upon  earth,  was  to  Schleier- 
macher,  in  her  laws  of  life,  sufferings,  and  failings  a  unity  ;  and 
for  this  reason  he  worked  incessantly  for  the  healing  of  schisms 
in  the  evangelical  Church,  for  the  union  of  the  Lutherans  and 
Reformed,  and  especially  also  in  his  Dogmatics,  published  in 
1821,  three  centuries  after  the  publication  of  Melancthon's 
"Loci  Communes,"  which  he  intended  to  be  the  statement  of  the 
common  faith  of  Protestants,  as  "Melanchthon's  Loci"  had  been 
for  the  as-yet-undivided  Protestant  Church.  Also,  toward  the 
Roman  Catholic  Church  his  position  is  very  irenical ;  although 
he  was  fully  satisfied  that  the  antagonism  between  the  two 
Churches  had  not  yet  reached  its  acme.  This,  his  irenical  po- 
sition, had  its  basis  in  his  conviction  that  the  Catholic  Church 
was  divided  from  the  Protestant  Church  not  only  through  un- 
evangelical  elements,  but  also  through  a  peculiar  Christian 
individuality,  namely,  her  strong  leaning  toward  symbolism. 

Through  his  whole  architectonic  method,  especially  through 
his  definition  of  Christianity  and  its  limits,  Schleiermacher 
introduced  a  more  correct  estimate  of  the  individual  doctrines 
in  theology.  Every  doctrine  must  now  be  estimated  by  its 
nearer  or  more  distant  relation  to  the  central  point ;  and  the 
distill ction  between  the  foundation,  upon  which  every  thing 
in  the  Church  rests,  and  between  what  is  built  thereon,  (1  Cor. 
iii,  10-15,)  which  had,  indeed,  never  been  entirely  forgotten, 
but  greatly  obscured,  has  become  prominent  again.  Here 
is  the  basis  of  Schleiermacher's  stand-point  over  against  the 
different  theological  schools,  and  of  his  position  in  the  Church. 
His  love  of  union  is  not  based  upon  a  desire  to  shake  off  the 
symbolical  books  of  the  Church,  nor  on  dogmatical  indifferent- 
ism,  since  he  devoted  most  of  his  time  and  strength  to  dog- 
matics, and  saw  a  vital  function  of  the  Church  in  her  progress 
in  developing  dogmas;  and  still  less  did  he  work  for  the  union 
from  personal  considerations.  jS*o,  his  love  of  union  was 
based  upon  his  firm  conviction  that  there  is  no  radical  differ- 
ence in  the  doctrine  of  the  two  Churches ;  that,  therefore,  the 
differences  of  individual  doctrines  growing  out  of  the  common 
basis  are  not  of  vital  importance,  from  which  it  follows  that 
the  split  of  the  two  Churches  cannot  be  morally  justified.  By 
this  act  of  uniting,  the  Evangelical  Church  harmonizes  her 


18GD.1     Schleiermacher  /  his  Theology  and  Influence.         223 

conduct  with  her  theological  knowledge  of  the  necessity 
of  distinguishing  between  the  foundation  and  between  what  is 
built  thereon  ;  between  religion  and  dogma  ;  and  she  throws- out 
those  sickly  elements  that  have  been  at  all  times  a  necessary 
outgrowth  from  the  confounding  of  tliese  differences;  namely, 
the  intellectualism  of  a  negative  and  positive,  of  a  churchly 
or  subjective  character,  that  derives  its  strength  from  its 
mistaking  dogma  for  religion,  and  the  darkening  of  the  prin- 
ciple whereby  its  healthful  development  is  not  only  impeded, 
but  of  which  it  is  also  a  very  natural  consequence,  that  upon 
one  or  another  of  the  doctrines  of  the  Church  undue  stress  is 
laid.  The  result  of  such  a  decomposition  of  evangelical 
doctrine,  through  the  weakening  of  the  influence  of  its  central 
principle,  is,  for  example,  the  peculiar  stress  laid  for  the  Evan- 
gelical Church  upon  her  tradition,  as  her  sacraments,  or  the 
clerical  office,  or  upon  the  authority  of  the  canon  without  any 
regard  to  criticism  or  the  settling  of  the  material  principle. 
If  the  principle  of  the  Reformation,  justification  by  faith,  is 
obscured  in  its  central  position,  the  other  doctrines  assume,  to 
eay  the  least,  a  co-ordinate  position ;  but  the  necessary  conse- 
quence of  the  loss  of  its  hegemonical  position  is,  that  the  king 
becomes  a  subject.  •  For  as  there  must  necessarily  be  a  power 
confirming  all  dogmas,  this  power,  after  it  has  been  taken 
away  from  the  evangelical  principle,  is  transferred  to  some- 
thing else,  be  it  the  authority  of  the  Church,  or  of  the  canon, 
or  of  human  reason;  and  the  whole  evangelical  basis  is  jeopar- 
dized by  obscuring  this  principle  or  abandoning  its  central 
position.  Here  it  appears,  at  the  same  time,  that  the  higher 
importance  which  Schleiermacher  attaches  to  tradition,  cor- 
rectly understood,  for  the  Evangelical  Church,  is  of  essential 
service  in  preserving  her  pure  character  and  principle.  For 
tradition  is,  according  to  Schleiermacher,  the  power  of  the 
Christian  testimony  constantly  renewed  by  the  Holy  Ghost; 
which  testimony  has,  through  the  Holy  Spirit,  its  absolute 
certainty  in  itself,  and  is  produced  through  the  preaching  of  the 
Gospel,  and  has  the  Scriptures  for  its  basis  and  norm.  The 
evangelical  Christian  draws  thus  his  proofs  fur  the  divinity 
of  the  Scriptures,  not  from  rational  and  historical  arguments, 
nor  from  the  authority  of  the  Church,  but  from  the  testimony 
of  the  Spirit  as  to  his  actual  redemption  through  Christ ;  be- 


22i         Schleiermacher;  his  Theology  and  Influence.    [April, 

lieving,  indeed,  in  Christ,  not  through  the  mediation  of  the  Scrip- 
tures or  the  preaching  based  upon  it,  but  in  the  Divine  author- 
ity of  the  Scriptures  through  and  for  the  sake  of  Christ ;  from 
which  it  appears  that  tradition,  correctly  understood,  consists 
in  the  progressive  production  of  real  believers  by  the  opera- 
tions of  the  Holy  Ghost  through  the  preached  word ;  which 
believers  occupy  a  relatively  independent  position  toward  the 
sacred  Scriptures,  which  owe  their  highest  confirmation,  and 
the  recognition  of  their  authority,  to  the  authority  of  Christ, 
who  reveals  himself  to  faith  through  the  Holy  Ghost  as  the 
Redeem  er. 

While  Schleiermacher  has  clearly  drawn  the  line  between 
Christianity  and  fundamental  errors,  it  may  be  a  cause  of  regret 
that  he  has  pointed  out  only  anthropological  and  Christolo 
gical,  and  not  also  theological  errors,  as  the  antagonism  of 
Theism  and  Pantheism.  But  Schleiermacher  looked  upon  both 
Theism  and  Pantheism  as  philosophical  views  of  God,  and  he 
wished  by  all  means  to  keep  Christian  theology  strictly  distinct 
from  all  merely  philosophical  views  of  God,  such  as  a  so-called 
natural  theology  holds.  Moreover,  it  must  be  admitted  that 
his  theology  was  not  free  from  great  errors,  which  only  his 
sincere  love  of  the  Eedeemer  prevented  from  exerting  their 
legitimate  pernicious  influence.  By  this  love  he  was  con- 
strained to  admit  self-consciousness,  personality  in  God,  how- 
ever inadequate  to  his  philosophical  nature  this  idea  appeared 
for  a  designation  of  the  Infinite. 

Moreover,  one  peculiarity  of  Schleiermacher  must  not  be 
overlooked ;  it  was  his  constant  endeavor  and  great  object  to 
show  religion  to  be  independent  of  philosophical  systems,  and 
in  order  to  do  this  effectually  he  went  so  far  as  to  recognize 
in  the  Christian  self-consciousness,  primarily  and  peculiarly, 
only  a  personal  feeling  in  motion,  but  not  a  concrete,  objective 
knowledge  of  God.  Certain  forms  of  Theism  are,  indeed,  in- 
consistent with,  and,  therefore,  excluded  by,  the  consciousness 
of  absolute  dependence;  which  is  perennial,  as  taught  by 
Schleiermacher;  as  well  as  a  false  independence  of  the  world 
over  against  God.  making  God  a  limited  being.  By  the  same 
absolute  dependence,  the  pantheistic  view  is  also  excluded, 
according  to  which  the  world  is  God,  and  man  possesses  abso- 
lute knowledge  and  is  absolutely  free. 


1369.1      ScJdeiermacher  /  his  Theology  and  Influence.        225 

But  in  his  dogmatics  he  is  not  sufficiently  guarded  against 
determinism;  by  which  every  thing  happens  by  virtue  of 
eternal  determinations,  whether  these  are  deistically  so  received, 
as  if  every  thing  was  from  eternity  fixed  by  the  connection 
of  nature ;  or  pantheistically,  so  that  every  thing  is  referred  to 
the  universal  world-power  in  such  a  manner  that  the  spiritual 
world  is  neither  the  relatively  independent  cause  of  its  form- 
ative activity,  nor  appears  as  an  independent  life. 

This  determinism  of  Schleiermacher,  which  lays  the  main 
stress  upon  the  absolute  causality  or  omnipotence  of  God,  leads 
him  also  to  assign  to  those  divine  attributes,  by  which  man's 
moral  nature,  his  liberty  and  accountability,  his  imputation 
and  guilt,  are  conditioned,  only  a  subordinate  position ;  so  es- 
pecially, too,  the  Divine  holiness  and  justice;  whence  it  is  that 
he  does  not  properly  appreciate  the  Old  Testament  in  its  true 
and  lasting  value,  although  he  views  omnipotence  as  spiritual, 
and  in  Christianity,  as  absolute  love  and  wisdom. 

Schleiermacher  denies  the  possibility  of  knowing  God ;  and 
the  pious  feeling  is  to  him  the  only  form  into  which  the 
Absolute  can  spiritually  be  received.  From  this  source  his  de- 
terminism flows.  The  existence  of  God  is  philosophically 
thus  proved  by  him :  As  certainly  as  there  is  knowledge,  and 
the  necessary  duplicity  between  thinking  and  being  finds  in- 
this  knowledge  its  unity ;  as  certainly  as  the  necessary  differ- 
ence between  the  willing  agent  and  the  object  of  his  will  dis- 
appears in  the  act,  where  the  two  become  a  unit :  so  certainly 
an  absolute  transcendental  cause  as  God  must  be  assumed,  in 
whom  all  the  dualisms  of  the  world  can  find  their  final  union. 
Without  their  absolute  union  in  God,  even  their  partial  union 
in  the  world  would  be  impossible,  and  there  would  be  no 
possibility  of  either  knowing  or  acting.  God's  existence  is, 
therefore,  as  certainly  to  be  admitted  by  the  reason,  as  there 
is  a  possibility  of  knowing  and  acting.  But  what  God  is,  his 
being  and  constituent  parts,  we  cannot  know,  according  to 
Schleiermacher ;  to  whom  philosophy  is  merely  a  knowledge 
of  the  world,  taking,  of  corn-so,  a  transcendental  God  for 
granted.  But  theology,  to  which  he  denies  likewise  a  knowl- 
edge of  God,  is,  accordiug  to  him,  only  a  knowledge  of  the 
Christian  consciousness,  or  of  Christian  piety;  consequently 
only  self-consciousness — taking  God  as  the  absolute  causality 


226        Schlekrm acker ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.     [April, 

and  supreme  unity  for  granted, — indeed,  knowledge  also,  but 
such  a  knowledge  as  stands  primarily  in  the  service  of  the 
religious  community,  the  Church,  that  is  animated  by  no 
interest  in  the  theory  in  itself  or  objective  knowledge,  but 
which  refers  every  thing  to  the  Church,  and  must,  therefore, 
be  kept  distinct  from  philosophy  and  its  fluctuating  systems, 
and  can  as  certainly  be  kept  distinct  from  it  as  religious  life, — 
is  something  independent  of  thinking  or  willing.  But,  how- 
ever unsatisfactoiy  Schleiermacher's  philosophical  ideas  of 
God,  or  his  philosophical  theology,  may  be,  his  deep  piety  and 
genuinely  Christian  feeling  lead  him  back  to  the  truth  when 
he  says,  in  keeping  with  the  teachings  of  the  Scriptures,  that 
God  alone  can  know  himself;  when  lie  calls  God  the  unity,  that 
which  is  not  identical  with  the  totality  of  knowledge  and  being, 
but  is  their  absolute  basis ;  when  he  calls  God  not  only  the 
spiritual  Omnipotence,  but  also  Love  and  Wisdom. 

Schleiermacher  has  founded  no  school,  neither  a  philosophical 
nor  a  theological  one.  lie  appreciated  independence  of  thought 
too  highly  for  himself  and  for  others  to  entertain  even  such  an 
idea.  But  as  we  have  said  before,  he  has  exerted  an  influence 
upon  the  religious  world  and  upon  religious  thought  as  cer- 
tainly no  one  after  the  Information  period  ;  and  there  is  scarcely 
one  of  the  living  theologians  of  Germany  that  has  not  been 
powerfully  affected  by  Schleiermacher,  and  that  does  not  owe  a 
large  share  of  gratitude  to  him.  Schleiermacher  was,  in  the 
strict  sense  of  the  word,  not  orthodox ;  but  the  path  he  opened 
was  in  the  right  direction,  as  appears  from  the  fact  that  nearly 
all  his  followers  are  more  orthodox  than  he  himself.  We 
mention  only  the  following  as  expounders  of  the  Xew  Testa- 
ment :  Liicke,  Bleek,  Usteri,  Neandcr,  Schmid,  Olshausen, 
Tholuck,  Osiander,  Messner,  Riehm,  Weiss,  Lechler,  Holzmann. 
As  writers  on  historical  theology  :  Neander,  Hagenbach,  Jacobi, 
Piper,  Erbkam,  Uhlhorn,  Renter,  Dorner.  In  dogmatical 
theology  have  been  influenced  by  Schleiermacher,  notwith- 
standing their  individual  independence  and  their  differences 
from  each  other,  Nitzsch,  Twesten,  Julius  Midler,  Rothe, 
Tholuck,  Sack,  Yogt,  Hagenbach,  Martensen,  Licbner,  Hoff- 
mann, Auberlen,  Ehrenfeuchtcr,  Langc,  Ebrard,  Gess,  and 
many  others.  Schleiermacher's  determinism  has  been  retained 
only  by  Schweitzer,  Romang,  and  Schotten,  the  two  former 


1869.]     ScMeiermacher ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.         227 

being  Swiss,  the  last  Dutch.  All  these  construct  dogmatics, 
not  merely  from  the  formal  principle  of  the  Scriptures,  as  Bibli- 
lical  Supernaturalism  did,  nor  from  natural  reason,  as  the 
Rationalists  did,  but  from  the  material  principle  of  the  Ref- 
ormation, faith  in  unison  with  the  holy  Scriptures.  Scarcely 
any  less  has  his  influence  been  on  the  field  of  ethics,  as  we  see 
from  the  speculative  ethics  of  Werth  and  Rothe,  and  the  Chris- 
tian ethics  of  Schmid.  Practical  theology  owes  its  scientific 
form  to  Schleiermacher's  influence  altogether,  as  we  see  from 
the  original  works  of  Xitsch,  Palmer,  Liebner,  Schoeberlein,  etc. 

The  great  Catholic  theologians,  that  were  more  or  less  affected 
by  Schleiermacher's  spirit,  have  been  named  already;  of 
English  divines  we  mention  only  Maurice  and  Trench. 

One  remark  more.  It  cannot  have  escaped  the  thoughtful 
reader  how  great  a  similarity,  if  not  full  identity,  there  exists 
between  Methodistic  Christianity  and  Schleiermacher's  Chris- 
tianity in  its  highest  scientific  form.  To  Methodism  Christianity 
is  primarily  a  new  life  in  God,  mediated  to  the  believer  by  the 
Church  through  the  preaching  of  the  word  and  prayer ;  so  to 
Schleiermacher.  Both  Methodism  and  Schleiermacher's  the- 
ology deny  that  the  natural  man,  the  unchanged  and  un- 
sanctified  intellect,  has  any  insight  into  the  mysteries  of 
religion ;  but  this  identity  is  only  partial.  "When  we  go  to  a 
revival  meeting,  to  a*  class  meeting,  or  love-feast,  we  cannot  be 
mistaken  as  to  the  completeness  of  the  identity ;  but  when  we 
go  to  the  recitation-room  in  our  higher  institutions  of  learning, 
and  our  theological  seminaries,  if  we  examine  the  course  of 
study  prescribed  for  our  young  preachers,  then  this  identity  is 
greatly  marred  ;  not  only  the  identity  of  Methodism  and  Schlei- 
ermacher's theology,  but  also  the  identity  of  Methodist  life 
and  Methodist  theology.  This  is  the  case  with  nearly  all  our 
apologetical  literature.  Here  we  meet  as  highest  authority 
Paley,  Butler,  (Analogy,)  and  other  writers  from  the  deistical 
period.  iXone  of  these  men  viewed  Christianity  as  a  new  life 
from  and  in  God,  none  referred  to  the  testimony  of  the  Sjnrit, 
none  makes  a  change  of  heart  the  conditio  sine  qua  non  of 
understanding  the  Bible;  but  all  endeavor,  as  Supernaturalism 
did,  to  construe  from  miracles  and  prophecies  an  argument 
amounting,  if  it  could  have  been  completed,  to  a  demonstra- 
tion, thus  making  the  unsanctified  vovg,  which  St.  Paul  calls 


22S         Schleiermacher  ;  his  Theology  and  Influence.    (April, 

flesh,  the  infallible  umpire  on  the  subject  of  religion,  of  which, 
from  the  nature  of  the  case,  it  can  understand  but  little.  In 
the  face  of  such  facts  we  may  well  exclaim,  "  O  consistency, 
thou  art  a  jewel ! "  If  this  article  should  call  the  attention 
of  the  Church  to  this  self-apparent  inconsistency,  the  writer 
would  feel  more  than  repaid  for  the  labor  of  writing  it. 


Art.  IV.— GKOWTH  IX  LANGUAGE. 

Lectures  on  the  English  Language..     By  George  P.  Marsh.     First  Series.     Fourth 

edition.     New  York  and  London.     1SG1. 
The  Origin  and  History  of  the  English  language,  and  of  the  early  Literature  ichich  ii 

Embodies.     By  George  P.  Marsh.     London.     1S62.* 
Lectures  on  the  Science  of  Language.     Delivered  at  the  Pioval  Institution  of  Great 

Britain.     By  Max  Muller,  M.A.     First  and  Second  Series.     New  York.     1866 

and  1S67. 
Language   and   the    Study  of  Language.     Twelve  Lectures  on  tbe  Principles  of 

Linguistic  Science.     By  William  D wight  Whit.vey,  of  Yale  College.     New 

York.     1SG7. 

I.  Max  Muller,  Marsh,  and  Whitney,  may  be  ranked  to- 
gether as  the  leading  writers  in  English  upon  the  principles 
of  linguistic  science.  Mr.  Marsh  might  disclaim  having 
attempted  a  scientific  treatment  of  language ;  the  professed 
scope  of  his  works  is  limited  to  one  of  the  nine  hundred 
languages  f  spoken  among  men  ;  but  he  has  illustrated  that 
one  with  a  wealth  of  learning  derived  from  the  study  of  the 
facts  and  principles  of  human  speech.  His  opinions  upon 
generalization  in  this  science  have  the  rare  value  that  they 
are  pronounced  with  the  exemplification  in  hand,  and  then 
always  with  an  extreme  guardedness.  He  can  scarcely  contain 
his  wrath  against  speculative  inquirers  who  "guess  out  hidden 
meanings  and  analogies,"  and  "  build  the  whole  fabric  of  a 
national  history,  extending  through  ten  centuries,  on  the 
Roman  orthography  of  a  single  proper  name  belonging  to  a 
tongue  wholly  unknown  to  the  Eoinans  themselves."  % 

*  For  convenience'  sake  this  work  will  bo  referred  to  in  this  article  as  Second 
Series. 

f  Muller,  First  Series,  p.  35. 

X  Marsh,  Second  Series,  p.  30.     Loudon  edition. 


1S69.1  '  Growth  in  Language.  229 

Notwithstanding  the  considerable  advance  in  the  science, 
probably  he  would  not  now  withdraw  this,  which  he  said 
in  1SG2  : 

Comparative  philology  is  in  its  infancy — a  strong  and  vigorous 
infancy,  indeed — but  still,  in  its  tendencies  and  habits,  too  pre- 
cocious. It  is  the  youngest  of  the  sciences.  Modern  inquirers 
have  collected  a  very  great  number  of  apparently  isolated  phil- 
ological facts ;  they  have  collected  multitudes  of  seeming,  as  well 
as  numerous  well-established,  linguistic  analogies  ;  and  they  have 
found  harmony  and  resemblance  where,  until  lately,  nothing  had 
been  discovered  but  confusion  and  diversity.  But  still  here,  as 
evcry-xchere  else,  speculation  is  much  in  advance  of  knowledge,  and 
many  of  the  hypotheses  which  are  sprouting  like  mushrooms 
to-day,  are  destined,  like  mushrooms,  to  pass  away  to-morrow.* 

Professor  Max  Miiller  is  the  antipodes  of  Mr.  Marsh.  The 
former  is  the  extreme  of  scientific  courage  as  the  latter  is  the 
extreme  of  scientific  caution.  But  Miiller  brings  so  much 
learning  to  his  aid,  has  at  command  such  large  resources  in 
the  results  of  German  research,  and  announces  his  broadest 
generalizations  with  such  limitations,  that  even  Mr.  Marsh 
must  admire  the  flight  he  would  not  himself  dare.  Still, 
paradoxical  as  it  may  seem,  and  much  as  it  runs  against  the 
popular  opinion  in  this  country,  Max  Midler's  chief  merit  is, 
that  he  has  popularized  the  theories  of  his  German  brother 
scholars  for  our  large  English-eared  audience.  We  hail  Pro- 
fessor Whitney  as  a  new  star  rising  in  the  American  quarter 
of  our  Anglican  sky.  His  little  book  marks  an  epoch  in  the 
science  of  language  in  this  country;  as  a  contribution  to  exact 
study  in  this  department  of  human  knowledge,  it  will  give 
American  scholarship  an  honorable  place  in  that  of  the 
world. 

Professor  Whitney  has  set  himself  a  more  exact  task  than 
Max  Miiller  had  taken  up  ;  this  appears  in  the  very  titles  of 
their  respective  works,f  and  still  more  in  the  points  of  de- 
parture which  they  select.  The  Oxford  professor  begins  with 
claiming  for  his  science  a  place  among  physical  studies,  and 

*  Second  Scries,  p.  2S.  Three  words  arc  italicized  liero  to  call  attention,  not  to 
a  novel  opinion,  but  to  the  predominant  quality  in  Mr.  Mareh'a  studies.  Compare 
Whitney,  p.  324. 

f  "Lectures  on  the  "Science  of  Language  "  leaves  the  writer  to  wander  at  will; 
'  Language  and  the  Study  of  Language  "  imposes  an  obligation  to  method. 
Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — 15 


230  Growth  in  Language.  ,        [April, 

this  assumption  determines  to  some  extent  the  method  which 
he  pursues.  The  Yale  professor  tells  us,  in  his  first  chapter, 
that  "  the  whole  subject  of  linguistic  inquiry  may  be  con- 
veniently summed  up  in  the  single  inquiry,  '  Why  do  we 
speak  as  we  do  ? ' "  (page  10,)  and  this  question  is  the  key-note 
of  his  book.  Miiller's  method  has  an  unpleasant  flavor  of  the 
didactic  and  dogmatic  ;  Whitney's  is  prevailingly  inquiring 
and  inductive.  We  have  been  so  much  accused,  not  altogether 
unjustly,  of  being  a  nation  of  theorizers  and  dogmatists,  that 
it  is  a  pleasure  to  be  vindicated  by  such  an  example  and  con- 
trast in  a  field  where,  until  recently,  there  have  been  about  as 
many  theories  as  facts. 

II.  What  is  meant  by  growth  in  language,  and  what  is  the 
scientific  import  of  the  fact  of  such  growth  ?  Whitney  crosses 
swords,  if  so  martial  a  figure  be  allowable,  with  Muller  on 
the  second  of  these  questions,  and  makes  good  his  position  by 
an  answer  to  the  first  question.  The  Oxford  professor  makes 
language  a  natural  growth  on  three  grounds :  first,  that  it  is 
not  in  the  power  of  man  to  produce  or  prevent  the  changes 
that  occur  in  language ;  *  second,  that  language  must  be 
classed  among  the  works  of  God,  rather  than  among  those  of 
man;f  third,  that  the  method  of  its  study  is  the  same,  and 
that  the  science  has  passed  through  the  same  stages  as  the 
physical  sciences. £ 

Miiller  everywhere  treats  the  subject  so  discursively — so  im- 
plicitly admits  all  the  facts  which  make  against  his  theory,  and 
adorns  his  pages  with  such  a  profusion  of  illustration — that  it 
is  as  difficult  as  it  seems  uncandid  to  put  definition  into  his 
mouth.  What  seems  to  be  his  best  reason  for  calling  the 
science  of  language  a  physical  science  is  found  in  a  passage 
which  is  designed  only  to  show  the  importance  of  the  study : 

If  you  consider  that  whatever  view  we  take  of  the  origin  and 
dispersion  of  language  nothing  new  has  ever  been  added  to  the 
substance  of  language,  that  all  its  changes  have  been  changes  of 
form,  that  no  new  root  or  radical  lias  ever  been  invented  by  later 
generations,  any  more  than  one  single  element  has  ever  been  added 
to  the  material  world  in  which  we  live — if  you  bear  in  mind  that  in 

*  See  First  Scries,  pngc  47,  et  passim.  f  Wd,  p.  32. 

X  Empirical,  classificatory,  and  theoretical.  See  first  and  second  lecturos  of  tho 
First  Series. 


1SG9.]  Growth  in  Language.  231 

one  sense,  and  in  a  very  just  sense,  we  may  be  said  to  handle  the 
very  words  which  issued  from  the  mouth  of  the  Son  of  God  when 
he  gave  names  to  c'  all  cattle,  and  to  the  fowl  of  the  air,  and  to 
every  beast  of  the  field  " — you  will  see,  I  believe,  that  the  science 
of  language  lias  claims  upon  your  attention  such  as  few  sciences 
can  rival  or  excel.* 

Not  less  important  to  his  theory  is  an  assumption  much, 
dwelt  upon  in  his  pages,  that  the  individual  man  cannot,  by 
his  conscious  action,  out  of  deliberative  purpose,  change  the 
words  of  a  people. 

It  is  doubtful  whether,  if  both  these  assumptions  were 
admitted,  language  could  properly  be  classed  among  the 
physical  sciences.  If  man  has  not  made  language  he  has  at 
least  changed  it,  and  his  intelligence  has  been  active  in  this 
process ;  if  an  individual  cannot  alone,  by  conscious  effort, 
modify  the  words  of  a  people,  the  whole  people  do  in  some 
way  by  .their  choice,  however  unconsciously  exercised,  alter 
their  words.  Perhaps  it  is  not  out  of  place  to  ask,  Of  what 
value  is  the  eternal  barrier  between  us  and  the  brutes  -which 
is  found  in  language,  if  our  vocal  mark  is  only  a  physical  one? 
If  speech  lies  outside  the  domain  of  man's  intelligent  action 
and  voluntary  powers,  is  not  the  discovery  a  step  toward 
breaking  down  the  line  of  demarkation  between  man  and  the 
inarticulate  world  below  him  ?  Miiller  insists  with  so  much 
emphasis  upon  this  barrier,  he  thrusts  it  in  the  faces  of  the 
Darwins  with  so  much  confidence,  that  one  must  believe  that 
he  has  not  perceived  the  drift  of  his  own  theory. f 

We  ask  a  more  pertinent  question  when  we  demand 
whether  these  generalizations  of  Miiller  lie  at- the  base,  or  are 
the  cap-stones  of  the  science  ?  From  a  careful  induction,  were 
it  possible,  it  might  result  that  man  has  not  within  the  held 
of  history  added  to  the  radical  part  of  language,  but  such 
a  discovery  would  be  the  last  step  in  the  analysis.  It  involves 
the  unity  of  human  speech,  the  revelation  or  development  by 
the  first  man  of  all  that  is  essential  to  language,  and  leaves 
nothing  to  be  studied  but  the  modifications  of  that  language, 
the  ebb  and  flow  of  these  waves  of  sound  upon  the  tongue  of 
man.     But  these  theories  are  disputed  on  all  sides,  and  even 

*  First  Series,  p.  37. 

f  First  Series,  p.  351:  "LaDguago  is  our  Rubicou,  aud  uo  brute  will  ever  dare  to 
cross  it" 


232  Growth  in  Language.  [April, 

Midler  himself  admits  that  our  present  knowledge  only  renders 
probable  the  original  unity  of  human  language.  But  on  what 
safe  principle  of  scientific  inquiry  are  we  authorized  to  assign 
a  science  its  place  on  the  merits  or  significance  of  its  last 
possible  car  probable  generalization?  Still  further,  the  growth 
we  are  to  consider  is  one  which  is  intimately  associated  with 
human  intelligence,  which  expands  its  volume  with  the 
expansion  of  man's  intellectual  and  moral  nature ;  puts  on 
luxuriance  in  the  highest  civilization,  and  dwarfs  and  dwindles 
in  declining  empires ;  which  is  so  closely  related  to  the  spiritual 
activities  of  man  that  some  cannot  distinguish  between  the 
soul  and  the  word.  How  does  Max  Miiller  separate  man  from 
his  language? 

If  we  understand  him,  he  relies  much  upon  the  fact  that 
linguistic  and  political  classifications  are  not  identical.     "  The 
science  of  language  may  declare  itself  independent  of  history," 
because  it  is  not  coterminous  with  political  history.*     The 
•  history  of  the  Celtic  language  is  not  that  of  the  British  Isles ; 
but  it  is  none  the  less  true   that  the   history   of  the  Celtic 
language  is  inextricably  bound  up  with   the  history   of  the 
Celtic  race.     He  further  declares  that  we  may  study  languages 
by  themselves,  apart  from  the  people  who  spoke  them,  and  we 
must,    in   fact,   do  this .  with  regard  to  all   the   oldest   forms 
of  human  speech.     They  belong  to  peoples  whose  records  have 
perished,  whose  history  we  must,  in  part,  spell  out  from  the 
debris  of  their  language  scattered  over  the  theater  of  human 
action.     Two  things  suggest  themselves  here :  Could  we  pro- 
ceed at  all  in  the  analysis  of  these  oldest  fragments  of  speech — 
could  we  ever  discover  their  elder   brothership   to  our  later 
tongues — but  for  the  light  which  history  sheds  on  more  recent 
languages?     History  enables  us  to  determine  the  character- 
istics of  languages  spoken  in  its  ear,  and,  negatively,  to  excerpt 
and  set  apart  those  which  it  cannot  interpret.     Further:  our 
earliest  inductions,  which  furnish  us  the  materials  for  all  later 
researches,  are  made  upon  facts  of  personal  consciousness  and 
observation.     Who  could  construct  a  science  of  language  with- 
out his  experience  with  words?     But  if  it  is  possible  to  treat 
languages  apart  from  man   and  his  history — to  analyze  them 
as  we  do  flowers,  to  classify  them  as  we  do.  animals — if  the 
*  First  Series,  pp.  18,  19. 


1869.]  Growth  in  Language.  233 

play  of  human  fancy  and  the  struggles  of  human  thought  in 
expression  are  no  necessary  part  of  the  science  of  language, 
why  has  not  Miiller  himself  given  us  an  example  of  such  a 
6ystem  ?  The  ever-present  charm  of  his  pages  is  man's  facile 
intelligence  at  work  upon  words.  Had  he  treated  his  subject 
as  a  physical  science,  he  might  have  established  his  position  ;  he 
would  certainly  have  spoiled  a  rarely  charming  booh.  He 
constantly  betrays  his  cause,*  and  he  cannot  set  in  motion  the 
machinery  of  human  utterance  withont  putting  the  muscles  of 
the  face  under  the  control  of  the  human  will.  AYere  this 
speaking-machine  altogether  an  instrument  in  the  haiids  of 
constant  forces  it  would  always  yield  the  same  results ;  the 
shorn  syllable,  the  cramped  and  dying  sound,  the  word  worn 
smooth  as  a  pebble  on  the  ocean  beach,  owe  their  elisions  and 
attritions  to  the  purpose  or  caprice  of  human  will. 

III.  Professor  Whitney  does  not  directly  criticise  the  book  of 
Professor  Miiller,  but  he  makes  a  masterly  refutation  of  the 
doctrine  that  linguistics  can  be  classed  among  the  physical 
sciences.  He  denies  the  doctrine  that  language  has  a  life  and 
growth  independent  of  its  speakers,  with  which  men  cannot 
interfere,  and  revindicates  the  maxim  usus  norma  loquendi  as 
of  "supreme  and  uncontrolled  validity."  Page  -iO.H'  The 
changes  which  now  occur  in  language  are  matters  of  common 
consent.  Telegram  is  discussed  in  the  newspapers ;  reliahle 
is  shut  out  of  the  best  society,  but  gradually  wins  its  way 
among  the  less  fastidious.  A  by-stander,  seeing  the  first 
schooner  launched  into  Massachusetts  waters,  exclaims,  "  How 
she  scoons  !  "  and  the  owner  responds,  "A  scooner  let  her  be, 
then !  "  and  adds  a  word  tu  our  language.  Individual 
agency  is  inoperative,  except  as  it  is  ratified  by  the  com- 
munity, but  the  community  acts  through  individual  initiative. 
There  was  a  first  man  who  made  a  given  change  in  pro- 
nunciation or  spelling,  or  attached  a  new  meaning  to  an  old 
word.  (Page  44.) 

*  "The  growth  of  language  and  tho  growth  of  the  mind  are  only  two  aspects 
of  the  same  process."  Second  Series,  p.  9G.  On  the  next  page  he  speaks  of 
"that  wild  spirit  of  etymology  which  would  handle  words  as  if  they  had  no  past, 
no  history,  no  origin."  » 

f  It  is  not  intended  to  teach  that  Miiller  is  tho  author,  or  chief  advocate  even, 
of  any  theory  attributed  to  him  in  this  article;  ho  is  taken  as  the  popular  rep- 
resentative of  particular  views. 


234  Growth  in  Language.  [April, 

Our  Yankee  professor  points  out  the  spot  where  his  German 
predecessor  stumbled  in  the  following  paragraph  : 

What  makes  a  physical  science  is,  that  it  deals  with  material 
substances  acted  on  by  material  forces.  Iu  the  formation  of 
geological  strata,  the  ultimate  cognizable  agencies  are  the  laws 
of  matter;  the  substance  affected  is  tangible  matter ;  the  product 
is  inert,  insensible  matter.  ...  In  language,  on  the  other  hand, 
the  ultimate  agencies  are  intelligent  beings  ;  the  material  is  not 
articulated  sound  alone,  which  might  in  a  certain  sense  be  regarded 
as  a  physical  product,  but  sound  made  significant  of  thought ; 
and  the  product  is  of  the  same  kind,  a  system  of  sounds  iciili  in- 
telligible content,  expressive  of  the  slowly  accumulated  wealth  of 
the  human  race  in  wisdom,  experience,  comprehension  of  itself 
and  of  the  rest  of  the  creation.  What  but  an  analogical  resemblance 
can  there  possibly  be  between  the  studies  of  things  so  essentially 
dissimilar  ? — P.  49. 

In  the  two  phrases  which  we  have  italicized,  Professor 
Whitney  has  happily  expressed  the  subject  of  linguistic  growth 
— what  it  is  that  grows;  and  the  statement  that  "intelligent 
beings  are  the  ultimate  agencies  "  of  that  growth,  gives  the 
direction,  and  defines  the  boundaries,  of  these  studies.  We 
cannot  hope  to  pursue  these  investigations  to  advantage  if  we 
do  not  clearly  comprehend  the  nature  of  the  forces  which 
produce  linguistic  change.  These  forces  are  human,  social, 
intelligent,  volitional.  Language  is,  therefore,  according  to 
our  author, 

An  institution — the  word  may  seem  an  awkward  one,  but  we  can  find 
none  better  or  more  truly  descriptive — the  work  of  those  whose 
wants  it  subserves  ;  it  is  in  their  sole  keeping  and  control,  it  has  been 
by  them  adapted  to  their  circumstances  and  wants,  and  is  still 
every-where  undergoing  at  their  hands  such  adaptation. 

This  science  is  historical  and  moral ;  a  branch  of  the 
history  of  the  human  race  and  of  human  institutions. 

The  human  mind,  seeking  and  choosing  expression  for  human 
thought,  stands  as  a  middle  term  between  all  determining  causes 
and  their  results  in  the  development  of  language.  It  is  Only  as 
they  affect  man  himself  in  his  desires  and  tendencies,  or  in  his 
capacities,  that  they  van  aileet  speech;  the  immediate  agent  is  the 
will  of  men,  working  under  the  joint  direction  of  impelling  wants, 
governing  circumstances,  and  established  habits. — P.  48. 

IV.  The  field  opened  by  this  difference  between  Muller  and 


18G9.]  Growth  in  Language.  235 

Whitney  is  large  and  fascinating;  only  some  small  portions 
of  it  can  be  surveyed  in  this  article.* 

1.  The  limits  of  individual  action  in  modifying  that  which 
belongs  to  society — the  power  of  man  over  the  institutions  of 
men — constitute  one  of  the  points  of  divergence.  Nor  are 
political  theorists  and  social  philosophers  more  harmonious  on 
the  same  question.  The  associated  action  of  men  so  far 
transcends  the  power,  and  so  outruns  the  purpose,  of  individ- 
uals, that  the  unit  seems  lost  in  the  multiplications.  "What  is 
true  of  language  as  an  institution  is  equally  true  of  every  other 
institution — one  man  cannot  build  alone.  We  may  say  Cesar 
made  the  Roman  empire  ;  but  we  know,  so  soon  as  we  reflect, 
that  the  Romans  must  be  reckoned  as  the  true  factors  of  the 
empire,  and  it  is  a  more  accurate  statement  that  the  Romans 
made  Cesar.  The  Cesars,  wherever  they  work  or  rule,  must 
work  out  the  tendencies  of  their  times,  must  rule  in  sympathy 
with  the  conscious  wants  of  preponderating  classes  of  men. 
Individuals  seem  to  have  vast  power  when  they  move  in  the 
drift  of  society,  but  it  is  the  drift  that  carries  them  forward. 
No  man  can  change  a  word  against  the  wants  and  tendencies 
of  a  language ;  but  let  the  change  be  in  the  drift  of  the  move- 
ment in  his  speech — let  it  be  born  in  due  time — and  it  will 
pass  unnoticed,  unrecorded,  into  the  common  tongue. 

How  much  is  to  be  ascribed  to  the  individual  in  the  work 
of  linguistic  change  is  not  of  very  great  importance ;  but  it  is 
difficult  to  believe  that  these  changes  are  in  any  sense,  or  at 
any  stage  of  a  language,  properly  instinctive  and  spontaneous. 
They  begin  in  the  individual  life,  and  spread  with  greater  or 
less  rapidity,  but  always  progressively,  through  the  community 
or  nation. 

The  wisest  individual  is  commonly  incapable  of  determining 
the  results  of  forces  operating  in  nations.  They  are  not  the 
wisest  who  now  tell  us  that  they  saw  the  Reconstruction  con- 
flict before  the  Rebellion,  nor  those  who  tell  us  that  thev  saw 
one  million  soldiers  marshaled  when  the  anti-slavery  struggle 
began.  Wise  men  in  political  science  have  forecast  our  national 
future  with    quite    opposite   results.     The  rule  seems  to  be, 

*  The  relations  of  thought  to  language,  for  example,  especially  tho  question  of 
the  identity  of  the  two,  aro  not  touched  upon.  Professor  Whitney  discusses  the 
buhject  at  length  in  Jvccture  XI,  pp.  405-421. 


236  Growth  in  Language.  [April, 

that  the  wishes  and  sympathies  of  the  astrologer  are  the 
controlling  factors  in  his  calculations.  And  so  it  happens 
that  the  moderately  wise,  or  even  the  ignorant,  spell  out  the 
future  about  as  well  as  the  Champollions  of  prophetic  sociology. 
This  impotence  of  discernment  limits  individual  action  ;  de- 
prived of  prescience,  deprived  even  of  full  knowledge  of 
social  forces  already  at  work,  the  wise  man  seldom  perceives 
the  social  want,  the  strong  man  rarely  catches  the  social 
opportunity- 
Institutions — language  as  well  as  others — are  left  to  grow 
out  of  the  bosom  of  society  much  as  trees  grow  out  of  the 
soil;*  but  this  bosom  of  society  vindicates  its  intelligent  and 
volitional  characteristics  in  the  very  fact  of  defying  the 
prescience  or  steadfast  control  of  the  wise  and  strong.  One 
man  can  do  nothing  against  his  age ;  but  when  a  great  man  is 
cast  by  instinct,  or  moral  sympathies,  or  Providence,  into  a 
great  human  movement,  he  seems  godlike  in  power,  because  he 
expresses,  embodies,  a  whole  people.  Xo  one  can  demonstrate 
that  great,  movements,  in  language  have  not  illustrated  the 
rule.  The  historical  growth  of  language  affords  scope  for 
such  individual  action.  "  The  tradition  of  generations  is 
broken  by  political  or  ethenic  earthquakes,  and  the  work  Las 
frequently  had  to  be  done  over  again  from  the  beginning,  when  a 
new  surface  had  been  formed  for  the  growth  of  a  new 
civilization."  f 

2.  The  unconsciousness  of  linguistic  growth  is  another 
debatable  land  of  the  science  of  human  speech.  We  sadly 
need  a  nomenclature  for  the  latencies  of  the  mind,  especially 
for  the  unconscious  activities  of  man's  intellect  and  will.  The 
want  of  lit  terms  probably  explains  why  Professor  Whitney 
describes  the  same  thing  as  conscious  and  unconscious,  though 
not  without  an  effort  to  distinguish  it  as  twofold. 

*  Like  a  tree,  unobserved  through  the  solitude  of  a  thousand  years,  up  grows 
the  mighty  stem,  and  the  mighty  brunches  of  a  magnificent  speech.  No  man  saw 
the  seed  planted  ;  no  eye  noticed  the  infant  sprouts ;  no  register  was  kept  of  the 
gradual  widening  of  its  girth,  or  of  the  growing  circumference  of  its  shade,  till  the 
deciduous  dialects  of  surrounding  barbarians  dying  out,  the  unexpected  bole  stands 
forth  in  all  its  magnitude,  carrying  aloft  in  its  foliage  the  poetry,  the  history,  and 
philosophy  of  a  heroic  people." — Ferrier,  quoted  by  Farrar,  Orig.  of  Lang., 
p.  201.     London,  1SC0. 

\  Mullor,  First  Scries,  p.  30. 


18G9J  Growth  in  Language.  237 

The  passage  in  which  this  distinction  is  made  is  so  important 
to  the  theory  of  our  author,  and  is  so  good  a  specimen  of  his 
style,  that  we  quote  at  length : 

While,  however,  we  are  thus  forced  to  the  acknowledgment 
that  every  thing  in  human  speech  is  a  product  of  the  conscious 
action  of  human  beings,  we  should  be  leaving  out  of  sight  a 
matter  of  essential  consequence  in  linguistic  investigation  if  we 
failed  to  notice  that  what  the  linguistic  student  seeks  in  language 
is  not  what  men  have  voluntarily  or  intentionally  placed  there. 
As  we  have  already  seen,  each  separate  item  in  the  production  or 
modification  of  language  is  a  satisfaction  of  the  need  of  the 
moment ;  it  is  prompted  by  the  exigencies  of  the  particular  case; 
it  is  brought  forth  for  the  practical  end  of  convenient  communica- 
tion, and  with  no  ulterior  aim  or  object  whatsoever ;  it  is  accepted 
by  the  community  only  because  it  supplies  a  perceived  want,  and 
answers  an  acknowledged  purpo.se  in  the  uses  of  social  intercourse. 
The  language-makers  are  quite  heedless  of  its  position  and  value 
as  part  of  a  system,  or  as  a  record  with  historical  content;  nor 
do  they  analyze  and  set  before  their  consciousness  the  mental 
tendencies  which  it  gratifies.  A  language  is,  in  very  truth,  a 
grand  system  of  a  highly  complicated  and  symmetrical  structure; 
it  is  fitly  comparable  with  an  organi/.ed  body ;  but  this  is  not 
because  any  human  mind  has  planned  such  a  structure  and  skill- 
fully worked  it  out.  Each  single  part  is  conscious  and  inten- 
tional; the  whole  is  instinctive  and  natural.  The  unity  and  sym- 
metry of  the  system  is  the  unconscious  product  of  tire  eflbrts  of 
the  human  mind,  grappling  with  the  facts  of  the  world  without 
and  the  world  within  itself,  and  recording  each  separate  result  in 
speech.  Herein  is  a  real  language,  fundamentally  different  from 
the  elaborate  and  philosophical  structures  with  which  ingenious 
men  have  sometimes  thought  to  replace  them.  There  are,  indeed, 
artful  devices  in  which  the  character  and  bearing  of  each  part 
is  painfully  weighed  and  determined  in  advance;  compared  with 
them,  language  is  a  real  growth  ;  and  human  thought  will  as 
readily  exchange  its  natural  covering  for  one  of  them  as  the 
growing  crustacean  will  give  up  its  shell  for  a  casiug  of  silver 
wrought  by  the  most  skillful  hands.  Their  symmetry  is  that  of  a 
mathematical  figure,  carefully  laid  out,  and  drawn  to  rule  and  line; 
in  language  the  human  mind,  tethered  by  its  limited  capacities  in 
the  midst  of  creation,  reaches  out  as  far  as  it  can  in  every  direction 
and  makes  its  mark,  and  is  surprised  at  the  end  to  find  the  result 
a  circle. — P.  50. 

The  distinction  that,  while  "  each  single  part  is  conscious 
and  intentional,"  "the  unity  and  symmetry  of  the  system  is 
an  unconscious  product"  of  human  eJ^ortt  is  well  taken,  though 
the  deficiencies  of  language  leave  room  for  captiotis  criticism. 


23S  Groxoili  in  Language.  [April, 

But  there  is  a  distinction  lower  down,  which  seems  to  us  to 
explain  Professor  Whitney's.  Each  single  part  of  a  language 
is  conscious  and  intentional — or  the  product  of  a  conscious  and 
intentional  effort ;  not  in  the  extreme  import  of  these  words — 
not,  for  example,  in  the  sense  in  which  we  choose,  after  delib- 
eration, to  say  import,  rather  than  significance,  in  this  place. 
Indeed,  it  may  be  doubted  whether  the  rule  of  our  author 
does  not  seem  to  be  reversed.  The  word  its  was  not  probably 
used  at  first  with  deliberation.  It  slid  into  a  place  in  the 
language  through  human  carelessness,  just  as  most  changes  in 
the  pronunciation  of  words  begin,  but  a  certain  amount  of 
deliberation,  and  that  a  considerable  amount,  attended  its 
assignment  to  a  permanent  place  and  office  in  our  literature.* 

The  truth  is,  that  the  greater  part  of  our  conscious  and 
intentional  action  is  non-deliberative.  Each  drop  of  our 
volitional  life  falls  into  the  unbroken  stream  of  our  spiritual 
activities,  and  is  lost  to  our  inward  sight  in  the  constant  flow 
of  our  habits  and  tendencies.  Conscious  choosing,  or  deliberate 
choosing,  occurs  only  upon  the  arrest  of  some  small  part  of  the 
moving  mass  of  our  intellectual  life.  Hence  the  paradox — 
existing  only  in  the  words,  however — that  our  conscious 
volitional  life  is  for  the  most  part  unconscious,  or  not  written 
out  in  the  large  type  of  deliberative  consciousness. 

A  new  inflection  in  a  language  is  first  used  by  some  one  to 
supply  a  momentary  need ;  it  is  caught  from  his  lips  by  others, 
it  passes  into  the  language  by  continued  repetition,  it  is  never 
debated,  or  if  debated  the  discussion  occurs  after  it  is  a  real 
constituent  of  the  spoken  language  of  the  people.  But  it  was 
used  at  first,  and  repeated  afterward,  through'  a  volitional 
activity. 

But  in  what  sense  is  the  whole  system  of  a  language  instinct- 
ively constructed?  In  this,  that  the  linguistic  instinct,  or 
aesthetic  sense  of  consistency,  or  the  tendencies  of  intellectual 
habits,  or  the  genius  of  the  language,  presides  over  the  out- 
reaching  hand  which  marks  out  the  circle  of  any  one  human 
speech.  This  attempt  to  render  more  clear  the  action  of  the 
will  in  language,  and  to  set  in  better  light  the  workings  and 

*  Professor  Whitney  probably  refers  this  later  stago,  or  the  discussion,  to  his 
"single  part"  class;  but  such  discussion  usually  involves  its  fitness  to  the  ex- 
isting whole. 


18G0.]  Growth  in  Language.  239 

passivities  of  consciousness  in  the  choice  of  what  is  encom- 
passed and  conceded  by  habits,  may  fail ;  but  the  failure  can- 
not carry  down  with  it  the  doctrine  that  the  growth  of 
language  is  a  product  of  the  travail- of -the  human  mind.  We 
must  concede  that  man  has  filled  his  sound-systems  with 
sense,  whether  or  not  we  agree  upon,  or  can  understand,  the 
manner  in  which  his  volition  acts  upon  the  single  parts  or 
unites  the  parts  into  the  magnificent  whole. 

3.  The  doctrine  that  language  can  be  studied  independently 
of  history  must  break  down  when  applied  to  any  particular 
speech;  but  how  can  the  science  dispense  with  the  results 
of  the  closest  and  most  thorough  study  of  the  best-known 
tongues?  We  have  not  a  fact  to  spare  from  the  clothing 
of  any  of  our  theories,  and  many  of  them  are  sadly  in  need 
of  at  least  aprons  of  fig-leaves  to  cover  their  nakedness.  Max 
Midler  tells  us  that  when  "language  itself  becomes  the  sole 
object  of  inquiry" — that  is,  when  we  are  not  pursuing  the 
study  of  a  tongue  as  a  means,  as,  for  example,  to  serve  "  as 
letters  of  introduction  to  the  best  society  or  to  the  best  litera- 
ture of  the  leading  nations  of  Europe  " — "dialects  which  have 
no  literature,  the  jargons  of  savage  tribes,  the  clicks  of  the 
Hottentots,  and  the  vocal  modulations  of  the  Indo-Chinese  are 
as  important,  nay,  for  the  solution  of  some  of  our  problems, 
more  important,  than  the  poetry  of  Homer  or  the  prose 
of  Cicero."  *  With  proper  limitation,  perhaps,  this  is  true ; 
but  it  is  misleading.  The  history  of  the  growth  of  any  one 
language  spoken  by  a  people  who  have  risen  up  into  civiliza- 
tion must  be  of  incomparably  more  value  to  those  who  propose 
to  study,  the  science  of  language  in  the  spirit  of  scientific 
inquiry  than  the  whole  mass  of  languages  which  have  no 
history  and  can  scarcely  be  morphologically  classified.  "We 
shall  understand  dialects  and  jargons  and  clicks  only  when  we 
bring  to  the  study  of  them  all  the  knowledge  of  linguistic 
change  which  can  be  obtained  from  careful  research  into  the 
earliest  forms,  successive  variations  of  forms,  losses  and  gains 
of  words  in  such  a  language  as  our  own,  coupled  with  a 
thorough  search  after  the  causes  of  growth  aud  decay.  If  it  be 
suspected  that  the  one  speech  is  dcllected  from  normal  lines 

*  First  Sorios,  p.  33.  Compare  Marsh,  Second  Series,  pp.  25-28,  especially  note 
to  page  27  ;  and  Muller,  Second  Series,  pp.  2G0,  2G2. 


240  Growth  in  Language.  [April, 

of  progress  by  special  forces,  political  or  moral,  and  such  de- 
flection is  inevitable,~our  resource  is  to  follow  another  language 
through  its  history.  We  shall  by  this  time  begin- to  discover 
what  is  constant,  and  a  wider  study  will  enrich  us  with  the 
fundamental  inductions  of  the  science. 

1n"o  one  has  succeeded  in  this  branch  of  human  inquiry  upon 
any  other  system.  Miiller  pursues  no  other.  Here,  as  every- 
where else,  his  theory  of  method  is  contradicted  by  his  own 
practice.  It  is  no  chance  that  the  Latin,  Greek,  French, 
C4erman,  and  English  tongues  furnish  the  best  illustrations 
of  his  leading  laws  of  growth.  The  laws  were  learned  from 
the  study  of  these  languages  which  come  to  the  student 
clothed  with  a  history.*  The  Latin  language — spread  out  over 
the  face  of  Em-ope — identified  with  all  the  written  history  of  a 
continent — colliding  against  and  mixing  with  barbarian 
dialects  of  diverse  character — dying,  and  yet  embalmed  in  a 
literature  and  living  in  tongues — less  majestic,  perhaps,  but  not 
less  beautiful  or  copious — this  Latin  language,  and  those  which 
are  commonly  derived  from  it,  have  given  us  the  larger  and 
better  part  of  our  principles  of  linguistic  growth.  Sanscrit 
would  have  been  useless  without  the  Latin  which  was  whipped 
into  us  at  school,  and  all  our  explorations  on  the  barbarian 
frontiers  may  not  yield  as  much  scientific  result  as  would 
historical  studies  into  the  early  growth  of  the  French  and 
Spanish  languages. 

This  is  not  written  to  disparage  the  study  of  the  languages 
spoken  by  uncivilized  tribes.  The  hut  of  the  savage  has  its 
place  in  a  science  of  architecture,  but  let  us  not  dream  that  it 
can  teach  us  more  than  the  Parthenon. 

The  value  of  historical  evidence  collected  from  the  best 
known  languages  appears  whenever  a  principle  of  classification 
is  to  be  adopted.  For  instance :  it  is  a  favorite  maxim  of 
Miiller  that  there  can  be  no  mixing  of  grammars ;  hence 
grammar  is  one  of  the  most  important  family  marks  by  which 
languages  can  be  genetically  classified. f  If  the  principle  be 
true,  no  better  proof  can  be  had  than  is  afforded  in  the  history 
of  our  own   tongue.     Our  vocabulary  is  more  than  half  of 

*  Seo  First  Series,  p.  55,  for  an  illustration  of  what  is  meant. 
\  First  Series,  p.  82.     Of  course  it  is  not  meant  that  the  maxim  is  peculiar  to 
Mullcr. 


1S69.D  Growth  in  Language.  241 

Latin  derivation,  direct  or  indirect;  our  language  was  for 
oenturies  subordinated  to  the  literary  lordship  of  Latin  and 
Xonnan-French — a  Letter  test  could  not  be  desired.  If  En- 
glish syntax  is,  and  always  has  been,  Teutonic,  the  rule  starts 
with  a  striking  example.  But  suppose  it  were  proved  that  at 
Borne  period  in  its  history  English  has  possessed  a  mixed 
syntax,  and  further,  that  this  mixture  is  now  discoverable  in 
our  grammar;  the  rule  would  lie  under  suspicion,  because  dis- 
credited by  the  growth  of  our  own  language.* 

Language  grows  into  its  highest  development  only  under 
or  along  with,  as  a  constituent  of,  a  complex  -civilization. 
Shepherds  and  fishermen,  roaming  the  hills  or  grouped  in 
huts  by  the  sea-side,  have  no  use  for  an  elaborate  speech. 
They  could  not  be  endowed  with  one ;  they  must  be  some- 
thing more  than  fishermen  and  shepherds  before  their  language 
can  expand  into  the  luxuriousness  of  full-grown  speech. 
Events  which  were  long  probable,  but  which  happily  did  not 
occur,  might  have  arrested  the  growth  of  our  language  and 
consigned  it  to  the  catalogue  of  rustic  dialects  of  Teutonic 
ftock.  The  failure  of  the  Plantagenets  to  unite  all  France 
under  their  government  saved  the  English  nation,  and  rendered 
possible  the  wonderful  and  complex  growth  of  our  mother 
tongue.  Mr.  Marsh  suggests  that  the  failure  of  the  Reformers 
to  emancipate  England  from  her  allegiance  to  the  Papal  See 
would  have  been  followed  by  results  analogous  to  those  which 
must  have  accompanied  the  reduction  of  Britain  to  a  prin- 
cipality of  France. f  We  are  entitled  to  believe  that  political 
convulsions  have  often  hastened,  retarded,  or  arrested  the 
growth  of  other  tongues. 

The  limits  assigned  to  this  article  arrest  us  here.  "We  dis- 
miss the  theme  for  the  present  with  one  reflection.  The 
motives  which  impel  linguistic  students  to  seek  recognition 

*  This  is  a  question  of  fact  which  canuot  bo  considered  to  be  settled.  See 
Marsh,  First  Series,  Lee.  XVII.  On  the  principle  itself  Mr.  Marsh  writes  in  his 
&K.'ond  Series,  p.  45,  "This  theory  is  carried  too  far,  I  think,  when  it  is  insisted 
•hat  no  amalgamation  of  the  grammatical  characteristics  of  different  speeches 
w  possible;"  and  Whitney,  page  323,  says,  "Penetrating  study  often  brings  to 
1  -'hi  resemblances  between  two  languages  which  escape  a  superficial  examina- 
"*n,  ami  .  .  .  shows  the  illusiveness  of  others  which  at  first  sight  appeared  to  be 
valid  evidences  of  relationship." 

t  First  Scries,  p.  110. 


242  Growth  in  Language.  [April, 

among  physicists  afford  a  very  good  illustration  of  unconscious 
tendencies.  The  "school  of  modern  philosophers  who  are 
trying  to  materialize  all  science,  to  eliminate  the  distinction 
between  the  physical  and  the  intellectual  and  moral,  to  declare 
for  naught  the  free  action  of  the  human  will,  and  to  resolve 
the  whole  story  of  the  fates  of  mankind  into  a  series  of  purely 
material  effects,  produced  by  assignable  physical  causes,  and 
explainable  in  the  past,  or  determinable  for  the  future,  by  an 
intimate  knowledge  of  those  causes,  by  a  recognition  of  the 
action  of  compulsory  motives  upon  the  passively  obedient 
nature  of  man  ; "  *  have  obtained  the  ear  of  the  world,  and 
fascinated  all  who  cultivate  any  department  of  knowledge. 
Psychology  itself  seems  ambitious  of  the  popular  livery. f  To 
get  a  place  among  men  whose  words  are  taken  as  the  ever- 
lasting gospel  of  science,  is  the  scarcely-concealed  object  of 
Max  Miiller's  theory ;  and  yet  no  one  will  suspect  him  of  a 
deliberate  surrender  of  man's  part  in  language  to  the  control 
of  material  laws. 


Aet.  V.— METHODISM:  ITS  METHOD  AXD  MISSION. 

THSdmethod  of  an  ecclesiastical  system  is  as  important  to  its 
proper  interpretation  as  the  method  of  a  school  of  philosophy. 
Let  the  question  be,  then,  How  has  Methodism  reached  its 
present  status  in  doctrine,  Church  polity,  as  an  experimental 
missionary  system,  a  civilizing  force,  and  an  administrative 
power  ?  What  has  been  and  ought  to  be  its  method  of  obtain- 
ing truth,  wisdom,  and  efficiency? 

To  answer  safely,  a  few  leading  facts  must  be  carefully  con- 
sidered. We  first  ask  attention  to  the  fact  that  the  religious 
faith  of  mankind  is  not,  first  and  chiefly,  a  logical  couviction ; 
and  the  method  of  Methodism  accepts  this  fact.  Our  people 
do  not  reach  the  doctrine  of  depravity,  for  instance,  first  by 
argumentation.  They  have  felt  the  presence  of  a  searching, 
revealing  Spirit.     Startling  revelations  have  been  made  to  the 

*  Whitney,  p.  49. 

f  See  Prof.  Jewell's  article  in  the  April  Quarterly.  Psychologists  have  invented 
pomo  of  the  plagues  that  threaten  their  domains  with  devastation. 


1860.1  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  2i3 

individual  consciousness,  and  each  sinner  has  found  himself  cry- 
ing, uO  -wretched  man  that  I  am,"  My  heart  "is  deceitful  above 
all  things,  and  desperately  wicked."  In  like  manner,  and  not  by 
Bcholastic  processes,  justification  by  faith  takes  its  place  in  our 
theological  system.  There  is  first  a  painful  conviction  for  sin, 
then  a  view  of  Christ — not  the  Christ  of  the  books  but  the  Christ 
of  inspiration — Christ  rising,  extending,  stronger  every  mo- 
ment, at  length  almighty  to  deliver;  and  confidence  in  him 
triumphs  over  timidity  and  conscious  guilt,  and  thus  faith  in 
a  divine-human  Christ  brings  justification  and  peace  with  God. 
Henceforth  adoption  is  matter  of  illuminated  consciousness. 
Its  evidence  is  not  the  dictum  of  a  priest,  but  "  the  witness 
of  the  Spirit."  Now  come  the  keen  convictions  of  indwelling 
depravity,  the  yearnings  for  purity,  the  manifestation  of  un- 
limited merit  in  the  blood  of  Jesus,  and  the  faith  which  brings 
the  cleansing  power  into  the  soul,  and  the  witness  of  perfect 
love.  Like  their  great  founder,  Methodists  accept  the  doctrine 
of  holiness,  not  first  as  a  part  of  systematic  divinity,  but  as 
a  great  experimental  fact. 

So,  also,  the  doctrines  of  the  possibility  of  final  apostasy,  of 
the  duty  of  perpetual  progress,  of  the  great  truths  of  the  un- 
interrupted consciousness  and  immortality  of  the  soul,  of  the 
resurrection  of  the  body,  of  the  general  judgment,*  of  the  end- 
less happiness  of  the  righteous,  and  of  the  eternal  punishment 
of  the  finally  impenitent,  came  to  their  places  in  the  faith  of 
Methodism  not  first  as  elements  of  a  dogmatical  system,  but, 
like  all  other  Bible  truths,  as  great  religious  convictions,  to  be 
thoroughly  examined  and  tested  by  logical  appeal  to  the  only 
inspired  standard. 

Thus  by  what  may  be  termed,  in  some  strong  sense,  inspira- 
tion, scrutinized  by  the  severest  logic,  the  Methodist  Church  has 
received  the  clearest,  best  defined,  and  least  mutable  system  of  the- 
ology known  in  the  history  of  doctrines.  This  is  our  first  indi- 
cation of  the  general  law  of  method  for  which  we  arc  searching. 

In  further  pursuing  this  inquiry,  let  us  come  again  to 
facts.  In  the  light  which  God  poured  into  the  mind  of 
^Vesley  he  saw  the  fallen  state  of  the  Church  and  the  peril  of 
souls.  He  felt  "  inwardly  moved  "  to  go  out  and  try  to  save 
them.  When  with  his  brethren  he  found  himself  in  a  flame 
of  revival,  and  was  called  upon  to  explain,  his  answer  was 


244  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.         [April, 

"  God  thrust  us  out  to  raise  up  a  holy  people."  In  the  mean 
time  certain  laymen  appeared  among  the  people,  like  John  the 
Baptist  in  the  wilderness,  announcing  a  message  from  heaveu, 
and  with  tears  and  overwhelming  power  beseeching  men  to 
"flee  from  the  wrath  to  come."  Wesley  was  startled.  But 
if  the  "  preaching  "  of  these  plain,  unordaincd  men  was  not 
"with  enticing  words  of  man's  wisdom,"  it  was  surely  "in 
demonstration  of  the  Spirit  and  of  power."  Promptly  the 
inspired  logic  of  his  lofty-souled  mother  came  to  the  help  of 
his  own,  and  he  said,  "  Go  and  preach,  for  the  Holy  Spirit  com- 
mands you.  What  am  I  that  I  should  withstand  God  ?  "  Be- 
lief in  the  essential  priesthood  of  the  laity,  and  the  paramount 
authority  of  a  divine  call  to  preach  the  Gospel,  is,  therefore, 
very  primitive  Methodism.  If,  then,  it  be  demanded  why  so 
many  plain  laymen  have  become  powerful  Methodist  preachers, 
the  answer  is,  With  us  preaching  is  not  a  profession,  but  a 
vocation.  As  in  the  early  apostolic  Church,  "not  many  wise 
men  after  the  flesh,  not  many  mighty,  not  many  noble,  are 
called  :  but  God  hath  chosen  the  foolish  things  of  the  world  to 
confound  the  wise;  and  God  hath  chosen  the  weak  things  of 
the  world  to  confound  the  things  which  are  mighty  ;  that  no 
flesh  should  glory  in  his  presence."  From  the  very  first  divine 
utterance  to  the  soul  which  brings  up  the  strange  "  woe  is  me 
if  I  preach  not  the  Gospel,"  on  through  all  the  grades  of  the 
sacred  office,  "  moved  by  the  Holy  Ghost,"  gives  expression  to 
the  profoundest  truth  in  the  constitution  of  our  holy  ministry. 
This  alone  fully  explains  a  remarkable  fact  in  the  history  of 
the  Methodist  pulpit.  The  logical  method  evidently  would  be, 
first  to  learn  to  preach,  and  then  preach.  We  preach  first 
and  learn  to  preach  afterward.  It  explains  also  our  grand 
itinerancy.  In  the  logical  method,  ministers  should  be  called 
by  a  congregation  at  a  stipulated  salary.  But  we  have  heard, 
sounding  through  our  souls  to  their  very  depths,  the  call  of  the 
Master,."  Go  ye  into  all  the  world  and  preach  the  Gospel  to 
every  creature.  He  that  believeth  and  is  baptized  shall  be 
saved  ;  but  he  that  believeth  not  shall  be  damned : "  and  we 
have  gone,  "  thrust  out,"  regardless  of  salaries,  church  calls, 
parish  lines,  and  prescriptive  forms,  to  save,  if  possible,  some 
of  these  millions  rushing  down  to  hell.  Under  such  inspira- 
tions  our   ministry   arose,   and   hence   every   true   Methodist 


1SC9.]  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  245 

preacher  is  a  heaven-appointed  missionary,  and  the  apostolic 
announcement  of  the  great- sonled  Wesley,  "  The  world  is  my 
parish,"  becomes  at  once  luminous  and  prophetic. 

Questions  of  logical  Church  order  follow  inspiration  promptly, 
and  reason  supernaturally  illuminated  has  extraordinary  clear- 
ness and  power.  It  was  felt  that  authority  came  from  Wesley; 
men  were  moved  to  submit  to  it,  and  argument  declared  it 
reasonable.  Carefully  scrutinizing  and  rationally  accepting 
the  indications  of  Providence,  logic  in  its  proper  place  gave 
position,  which  proved  to  be  historical,  to  the  "  Conference," 
the  "Minutes,"  and  the  "  Deed  of  Settlement,"  and  ordained  a 
reliable  succession.  The  class  meeting  was  an  inspiration,  and 
logic  came  in  to  help  sustain,  extend,  and  perpetuate  it.  The 
love-feast  was  an  historical  recognition.  So  also  were  an 
episcopal  form  of  Church  government  and  presbyterial  ordina- 
tion. General  Superintendents,  Presiding  Elders,  Quarterly, 
Annual,  and  General  Conferences,  came  in  due  time  to  their  re- 
spective positions,  the  Conference  "Minutes"  grew  and 
changed  into  the  form  of  a  compact  and  comprehensive  "  Dis- 
cipline," all  pervaded  by  a  vigorous  life,  and  including  a  scope 
and  perfection  of  organic  practical  power  which  could  under 
no  circumstances  be  the  product  of  mere  human  reason,  and 
yet  answering  promptly  to  the  severest  logical  tests. 

Thus  a  system  of  Church  polity  rises  up  before  us  most  evi- 
dently vitalized  by  insjriration,  and  sustained  by  logic ;  and 
precisely  in  this  ivay  the  Methodists  have  become  the  grandest 
organisers  in  the  world.  This  is  a  further  indication  of  a 
general  law. 

We  are  now  prepared  to  examine  the  unprecedented  successes 
of  Methodism.  Large  numbers,  of  themselves,  prove  nothing 
good  or  valuable.  But  it  should  be  considered  that  the  vast 
m altitudes  of  Methodism  have  been  gathered,  not  by  any  re- 
cognized natural  laws.  Proselytes  have  not  been  made  by  any 
proffered  pleasures,  affluence,  or  honor.  No  covert  corruption 
baa  appealed  to  the  lower  passions,  or  promised  "indulgence" 
for  money.  We  have  dropped,  into  no  strong  popular  worldly 
current  to  float  with  the  masses.  Upon  the  contrary,  from 
the  very  first,  with  holiness  for  our  great  central  idea,  we  have 
*onght  t0  arrest  the  cherished  sins  of  the  people,  thrown  every 
possible  obstacle  in  the  way  of  their  carnal  gratifications',  and 
Fourth  Skkies,  Vol.  XXL— 16 


216  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

denounced,  in  language  of  scathing  rebuke,  all  forms  of  private 
and  popular  wrongs,  whether  in  high  places  or  low.  By  the 
plainness  of  most  unwelcome  truths,  and  the  thoroughness  of 
fearless  exposures,  we  have  provoked  the  bitterest  opposition. 
"We  were  a  handful  of  the  poor  and  despised  amid  countless 
numbers  of  enemies,  rich  and  powerful  as  well  as  unscrupu- 
lous and  vulgar.  By  all  laws  of  human  forces,  we  should  have 
been  overwhelmed  and  annihilated.  But  instead,  we  grew 
rapidly.  We  made  converts  of  our  enemies,  high  and  low,  in 
astonishing  numbers ;  converts,  be  it  observed,  from  trust  in 
"things that  are  seen"  to  faith  in  the  invisible  ;  from  a  moral 
condition  most  natural  and  universal  to  one  most  dreaded  and 
restricted  in  its  natural  gratifications.  We  demanded  that  men 
and  women  should  leave  the  "  broad  "  and  enter  "  the  narrow 
way  " — from  license  to  law.  We  made  no  pretensions  to  a 
"liberal"  Gospel.  We  resisted  all  temptations  to  popularize 
the  message.  True,  it  did  contain  much  that  was  tender  and 
compassionate,  but  it  was  solemn,  awful,  severe  !  How  strange, 
how  contrary  to  nature !  And  yet  multitudes  were  won  by  it. 
It  was  again  the  marvel  of  apostolic  times.  Under  the  teach- 
ing of  a  few  despised  men,  these  multitudes  came  to  love 
the  things  they  once  hated  and  to  hate  the  things  they  once 
loved.  Thus  has  arisen  a  large,  powerful  organization  for 
the  promotion  of  holiness ;  and  the  movement  increases  in 
momentum  beyond  all  precedent,  the  Methodist  Episcopal 
Church  alone  rolling  up  its  hundred  thousand  and  more  net 
increase  a  year. 

To  explain  these  extraordinary  results  is  the  problem.  The 
reasons  assigned  must  not  be  those  which  would  apply  equally 
to  the  other  excellent  Churches,  much  older  in  organization 
than  ours,  which  we  have  left  far  in  the  rear. 

Let  it  be  first  observed  that  the  grand  power  which  is  to 
convert  the  world  is  not  logic,  but  inspiration.  This  is  a 
divine  adjustment  of  the  Gospel  of  salvation  to  the  Gospel 
of  creation.  The  minds  of  men  are  not  first  and  chiefly 
logical,  but  sensitive.  They  have  reason  in  various  degrees, 
but  in  development  the  logical  consciousness  is  much  later 
than  the  sensitive.  This  is  true  of  all  classes  of  mind, 
but  most  conspicuous  in  the  masses.  It  follows  that  an 
emotional  Christianity  arrests  and  impresses  more  promptly 


1809.1  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  247 

and  successfully  than  a  form  in  which  the  intellectual  pre- 
dominates. This  would  be  an  easy  and  rational  explanation  of 
llie  popular  influence  of  Methodism.  We  are  warm,  energetic, 
and  nearly  ubiquitous.  We  are  subdued,  melted,  moved.  Our 
whole  svstem  of  worship  and  action  is  instinct  with  a  joyous 
contagious  life.  The  people,  therefore,  like  us.  'We  sprang 
from  them,  and  remain  in  intimate  sympathy  with  them.  Our 
Gospel  of  freedom  strikes  them  at  once  as  being  true.  Our 
ministers,  coming  from  the  people,  have  generally  had  the  good 
sense  to  remain  among  them.  "The  Church  of  the  people" 
is,  therefore,  our  most  naturally  suggested  designation. 

The  apparent  limitations  of  this  reasoning  arc  not,  however, 
reliable;  for  true  religious  convictions  in  all  classes  of  mind, 
and  all  true  regenerations,  are  from  the  Holy  Spirit.  This 
agency  in  the  efficient  work  of  saving  men  must  not  be 
assigned  a  subordinate  or  mediate,  but  a  primary  and  independ- 
ent office — as  independent  when  acting  through  instrumen- 
talities as  without  them.  Let  it  therefore  be  considered  settled 
that  there  is  absolutely  no  conversion  without  inspiration,  and 
that  this  work  of  the  Holy  Spirit  must  antedate  all  other  in- 
fluences, and  prepare  the  soul  for  them.  iSTow  this  period  of 
conviction  for  sin  is  no  time  to  settle  theologies,  no  time  for  an 
appeal  to  the  logical  consciousness.  The  soul  must  see,  not 
argue.  All  other  things  being  equal,  therefore,  the  services 
most  spiritual,  conveying  with  the  greatest  certainty  and  the 
least  delay  the  purest  inspirations,  will  be  most  successful  in  pro- 
ducing true  faith  and  true  conversion.  "Warm,  fervent,  powerful 
prayers,  which  call  down  the  Spirit's  baptism  ;  clear,  earnest  in- 
struction, coming  from  sound  beliefs  and  souls  dissolved  in  love, 
and  singing  full  of  melting  pathos  and  glowing  inspirations, 
move  thousands  into  the  arms  of  Jesus,  while  the  cool,  intel- 
lectual processes  of  cautious  logic,  in  the  same  period  of  time, 
bring  comparatively  small  numbers  into  the  light. 

The  connection  between  true  Methodist  fervor  and  spiritual 
efficiency  is  not  therefore  accidental  nor  temporary,  but  real 
»nd  necessary  ;  as  clearly  a  necessity  to  such  minds  as  those  of 
Patrick  Henry  and  Andrew  J  acksbn,  who  were  powerfully  con- 
verted under  its  influence,  and  became  Methodists  late  in  life, 
and  the  late  Judge  M'Lean,  early,  and  to  the  moment  of  death, 
a  glowing  Methodist,  as  to  the  general  masses  of  men.     We 


248  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

insist  that  spiritual  earnestness — receiving  and  imparting  divine 
inspirations — is  the  legitimate  method  of  evangelical  power. 
Scholars,  therefore,  who  have  conceded  to  us  a  high  degree 
of  spirituality,  and  assigned  us  an  important  pioneer  mission, 
but  predicted  our  decline  after  this  work  is  done,  are  in  this 
unscholarlv.  They  have  based  their  judgment  on  the  assumed 
temporary  character  of  demonstrative  religious  fervor,  and  not 
upon  the  great  law  of  spiritual  adjustments.  Under  this  law 
people  of  all  grades  of  mind  become  Methodists  in  spirit,  first 
.by  conversion,  and  not  by  indoctrination ;  and  as  inspiration 
from  God  is  the  efficient  force  employed  in  conversion,  we  see 
here  at  once  the  grand  secret  of  our  power  and  the  method  of 
our  progress.  This  has  been  tested  in  action  upon  souls  in  a 
great  variety  of  circumstances.  Dead  scholastic  formalists, 
haughty  infidels,  and  vulgar  persecutors,  who  have  resisted  all 
logic,  have  been  melted  down  and  brought  into  "  the  kingdom 
of  Christ"  by  the  inspirations  received  through  the  most  humble 
teaching  and  simple  pleadings  of  faith  in  prayer.  In  our 
great  missionary  work  we  have  not  depended,  first  and  chiefly, 
upon  education,  or  any  other  secular  civilizing  agencies,  but 
upon  the  power  of  the  Spirit,  accompanying  a  spiritual  Gospel, 
and  exalting  to  supernatural  force  our  humble  spiritual  serv- 
ices. Chinamen  high  in  scholarship  as  well  as  those  lowest 
in  caste,  Mohammedans  and  Pagans  of  different  grades  in 
India,  dark  degraded  minds  and  princes  in  Africa,  as  well  as 
polished  Europeans  and  Americans,  have  been  born  again 
by  the  power  of  the  Spirit ;  and  whole  conferences  of  minis- 
ters, missionary  and  native,  have  risen  up  in  each  quarter  of 
the  globe.  Methodist  songs  and  prayers,  exhortations  and 
sermons,  and  shouts  of  joy  are  ringing  in  the  ears  of  the  people, 
and  rising  up  to  heaven  in  the  most  splendid  languages  and 
barbarous  dialects  of  earth.  Now,  these  stupendous  results  are 
not  given  in  any  philosophical  development,  by  any  logical 
method,  however  scientific  or  perfect.  They  are  absolute  re- 
creations upon  a  vast  scale,  and  hence  of  God  alone.  Human 
power  could  be  instrumental  in  their  production  only  as 
energized  by  inspiration  truly  divine.  We  are,  therefore,  pre- 
pared for  the  statement  that 

Inspiration    is   the  primary  vitalizing  force  of  the  great 
experimental  missionary  system  of  Metlwdism.     It  is  hence 


16C9.]  Methodism :  ite  Method  and  Mission.  249 

thoroughly  alive,  sovereignly  aggressive,  tending  rapidly  to 
universality.     This  is  the  third  indication  of  our  general  law. 

We  may  now  direct  attention  to  the  stimulating,  expanding 
effect  of  tins  method  of  power  upon  mind  and  its  activities. 
The  great  work  of  spiritual  re-creation  and  illumination  must, 
from  the  unity  of  mind,  produce  marked  intellectual  effects. 
The  desire  to  know,  under  this  quickening  impulse,  advances 
promptly  to  earnest  longings  after  truth  of  all  kinds.  For  the 
purposes  of  study  the  first  great  necessity  of  mind  is,  to  he 
thoroughly  aroused.  This  certainly  occurs  in  the  inspirations 
of  the  new  life;  and  the  yearnings  for  spiritual  science  natu- 
rally produce  yearnings  for  all  science.  Scholars,  therefore, 
who  profess  to  be  amazed  at  the  powerful  and  really  unprece- 
dented growth  of  educational  ideas  and  institutions  in  the 
Methodist  Church  are  in  this  also  unscholarly.  It  is  in  our 
system,  as  all  discerning  men  ought  to  see.  The  grand  inspira- 
tions upon  which  Methodists  depend  for  prompt  regeneration 
and  aggressive  missionary  power  quicken  the  whole  man  and 
the  whole  mass,  and  give  rapid  development  and  vigorous 
movement  to  every  thing. 

One  of  the  first  results  ought  to  have  been,  and  was,  an 
unusual  degree  of  self-help,  and  the  production  of  a  large 
number  of  self-taught  men,  who  would  be  powerfully  felt  in 
every  community  where  Methodism  appeared.  This  explains 
the  result  of  the  rudeness  and  rashness  with  which  they  were 
attacked.  Men  of  books  and  schools,  in  large  numbers,  turned 
to  look  with  astonishment  at  the  rough  granite-men  they  had 
dashed  against;  and  tried,  with  noticeable  confusion,  to  com- 
prehend the  power  by  which  they  had  been  vanquished. 

But  this  self-developing  force  would  naturally  lead  to  scho- 
lastic training,  and  bring  back  to  itself  a  large  infusion  ot 
science  from  common  sources.  Hence  appeared  the  pushing 
influence  of  Methodists  as  citizens  in  organizing  and  carrying 
forward  the  great  common  school  system,  especially  in  the 
newly-settled  portiuns  of  the  republic.  Hence  the  promptness 
With  which  our  Conference  academies  arose  and  moved 
to  the  front  in  numbers  and  popular  power.  Hence  the 
enthusiasm  in  multiplying  "colleges  and  universities,"  too 
frequently  indicating  inspiration  in  defiance  of  logic.  But 
foou  stern  reason  would  sit  in  judgment  on  these  impromptu 


250  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

creations;  and,  in  numbers,  location,  and  resources,  they 
would  come  to  order  so  promptly  that  invidious  criticism 
would  wonder  where  the  thing  was  which  it  was  about  to 
ridicule. 

This  whole  argument  applies  equally  to  the  kindred  develop- 
ment of  literature.  The  forces  which  have  produced  our 
periodical  and  volume  press,  our  immense  publishing  houses 
and  literary  commerce,  are  to  a  good  degree  occult,  and 
especially  unknown  to  our  rivals  and  envious  critics.  It  is  safe 
to  say,  that  no  adequate  explanations  can  be  found  in  any 
argument  which  would  show  their  necessity  or  attempt  to 
estimate  their  importance.  No  great  master-mind  has  ever 
contrived  these  schemes,  produced  their  constituent  elements, 
or  adjusted  them  to  each  other,  in  their  present  completeness 
and  reach  of  organized  power.  Like  our  general  intelligence 
and  enterprise,  our  seminaries  of  learning,  and  our  great 
societies  for  the  propagation  of  the  Christian  faith,  they  are 
the  growth  of  the  Church.  All  our  presses,  periodicals,  and 
volumes,  with  our  millions  of  money  invested,  and  our  hands, 
and  brains,  and  hearts  employed,  are  the  direct  product  of  the 
life-power  of  the  Church.  They  arc  of  the  Church,  in  the 
Church,  and  for  the  Church.  They  feed  the  life  which  pro- 
duced them,  and  every  day  increase  its  power  to  produce  other 
larger,  mightier  outgoings  for  the  conquest  of  the  world  to 
Jesus,  "  the  life,  the  truth,  and  the  way."  We  will  now 
candidly  say  that  these  vast  publishing  interests  are  not  merely 
Christian  in  the  ordinary  sense.  No  common  Christian  enter- 
prise could  have  produced  them.  They  are  Methodist  institu- 
tions, born  of  the  very  providence  and  potent  with  the  very 
energy  which  has  produced  Methodism.  Methodism  could 
not  have  existed  without  producing  them.  They  could  not 
have  existed  without  Methodism.  Their  potentiality  and 
dependence  are  organic  and  inseparable.  Neither  the  spirit 
of  thought,  nor  the  pathos  of  style,  nor  the  business  energy  of 
this  heart-earnest  aggressive  Christian  literature,  can  be  ex- 
plained without  the  inspirations  which  have  cvery-where  taken 
the  lead  in  the  constitution  of  Methodism. 

We  now  advance  to  say,  that  so  far  from  being  a  suppression 
or  degradation  of  logic,  the  spiritual  philosophy  of  this  move- 
ment has  been  most  favorable  to  its  development.      It  may  be 


1S00.]  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  251 

safely  affirmed  tliat  from  Wesley  and  Fletcher  down  to  Bangs 
unci  Fisk,  no  more  trenchant  logicians  or  masterly  disputants 
have  ever  appeared  in  the  field  of  dialectics  than  the  Meth- 
odist Preachers.  They  were  regarded  at  first  as  innovators 
upon  established  Church  order,  and  at  length  as  invaders  of 
Calvinistic  orthodoxy,  to  be  met  and  repelled,  first  by  authority 
and  denunciation,  and  then  to  be  overwhelmed  with  logic. 
The  former  failed,  as  must  always  man  against  God;  and  as  to 
the  latter  the  challenge  was  promptly  accepted.  Our  spiritual 
warriors,  plain  and  polished,  battled  over  the  whole  field  of 
theological  and  moral  truth  with  a  "  cleverness"  and  success 
which  have  amazed  both  antagonists  and  friends,  demonstrating 
the  fact  that  "  logic  on  fire  "  arises  directly  from  inspiration, 
honored  in  the  advance. 

We  here  come  to  a  most  noticeable  fact.  It  is,  that 
wherever  these  warm  controversialists  began,  they  went 
straight  to  the  point  of  personal  liberty  and  responsibility. 
Three  grand  impediments  to  the  providential  mission  of 
this  free  republic  rose  before  them,  and  their  masterly 
power  in  dealing  with  each  of  them  is  slowly  advancing  to 
historical  recognition. 

They  first  encountered  the  limitations  of  the  will,  which  in 
every  form  firmly  antagonized  human  freedom,  and  by  a  strict 
logical  necessity  released  man  from  responsibility.  They,  there- 
fore, attacked  and  drove  this  grand  usurpation  from  its  impe- 
rious dogmatic  position  into  biblical  exegesis  and  philosophical 
criticism,  whence,  after,  successive  defeats  on  its  own  chosen 
ground,  it  at  length  seems  nearly  content  to  make  its  last 
retreat  iiito  old  books,  and  defunct  formulas,  henceforth  not 
to  be  depended  upon  to  furnish  a  practical  Gospel  for  any  class 
of  people,  nor  allowed  to  interfere  with  its  development  of 
pov/er.  In  this  the  citizens  of  the  Great  Republic  generally 
coiucide,  for,  with  characteristic  common  sense,  they  say  if 
the  will  is  not  free  there  is  no  freedom  any  where.  This  battle 
the  Arminian  Methodists  fought  nearly  alone. 

The  next  grand  impediment  to  American  liberty  appeared 
hi  the  limitations  of  conscience.  In  the  first  period  of  this 
contest  the  Methodists  joined  the  Baptists,  who  were  by  many 
years  their  heroic  pioneers.  As  the  result,  puritanic  and  prc- 
latical  bigotry  gradually  lost  their  dominant  power  in  the  East 


252  MctJiodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

and  South,  and  their  last  hope  of  becoming  national  on  this 
continent  passed  away.  Both  went  down  under  the  crashing 
blows  of  inspired  logic.  Religious  toleration  first,  and  at 
length  pure  religious  liberty,  became  the  grandest,  most  poten- 
tial fact  of  national  life  in  America. 

.  From  despotic  governments  abroad  a  religious  despotism 
has  been  imported  to  this  country,  and  with  this  form  of  the 
attempt  to  limit  and  virtually  destroy  the  rights  of  conscience 
the  battle  continues.  But  the  progress  of  freedom,  under  the 
guidance  of  true  inspirations,  firing  and  strengthening  the 
logical  consciousness  and  power,  has  accumulated  from  all  de- 
nominations able  defenders  of  the  soul's  most  sacred  rights ; 
and  the  will,  emancipated  from  the  thraldom  of  prescriptive 
dogma,  is  combining  one  grand  Protestant  phalanx  against 
this  menacing  usurpation;  while  from  its  relative  numbers, 
organic  compactness,  and  vigorous  life,  in  its  own  character- 
istic method,  Methodism  moves  in  the  van  of  this  noble  army 
of  religious  liberty,  and  the  decisive  victory  is  already  histori- 
cally indicated. 

The  final  form  in  which  personal  rights  were  antagonized 
here  was  African,  and  at  length  American,  slavery.  The  fiery 
logic  of  Methodism  rushed  upon  this  monster  despotism  with 
really  reckless  energy.  Profound,  however,  in-  its  reach,  and 
formidable  in  its  resources,  its  assailants  were  staggered,  and 
the  victory  awaited  successive  assaults,  and  the  gathering  of 
providential  forces,  bringing  on  the  grandest  crisis  of  modern 
history,  and  then  it  was  overwhelming.  Recognizing  as  we 
do  the  noble  heroism  of  our  brother  warriors  of  every  Church 
in  which  throbbed  the  great  heart  of  liberty,  it  is  }"et  most 
agreeable  to  know  that  the  Methodist  spirit,  true  to  its  early 
inspirations,  rallied  again  and  again  to  the  battle,  and  had  its 
just  position  at  the  front  in  the  last  great  conflict,  when  the 
monster  fell  to  rise  no  more. 

In  the  sweeping  away  of  these  three  formidable  limitations 
of  liberty  in  this  country  one  great  question  is,  Ave  believe,  set- 
tled forever.  Let  it  be  asked,  What  will  be  the  religion  of  the 
people  which  will  inspire  and  control  the  civil  life  and  des- 
tiny of  the  Republic  I  The  answer,  given  in  clear  historic 
revelations,  is,  It  will  not  be  necessarian  Calvinism,  it  will 
not  be  Roman  Catholicism,  it  will  not  be  slave  despotism  ;  it 


1 S09J  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  253 

will  be,  in  whatsoever  form  and  by  whomsoever  represented, 
"  Christianity  in  earnest." 

We  are  now  entitled  to  claim  that  inspirations  from  God, 
wielded  by  severe  logic,  have  imparted  to  Methodism  as  a  grand 
civilizing  farce  the  broadest,  loftiest  spirit  of  enlightened  jus- 
tice. In  this  it  has  availed  itself  of  a  power  absolutely  inde- 
structible, and  destined  to  become  universal.  We  have  here, 
then,  the  fourth  indication  of  a  general  law. 

We  come  next  to  consider  the  adaptation  and  adjustability 
of  administrative  to  missionary  Methodism.  Let  us  refer 
again  to  the  announcements  of  Mr.  Wesley,  "  to  spread  scrip- 
tural holiness  over"  all  lands,  "  the  world  is  my  parish."  The 
claim  of  universality  included  in  these  commanding  proposi- 
tions embodies  the  words  of  Jesus,  and  "  they  are  spirit,  and 
they  are  life  ;"  "  Sanctify  them  through  thy  truth  ;  thy  word 
is  truth  ;"  "  Go  ye  into  all  the  world  and  preach  my  Gospel 
to  every  creature."  Now  the  Church  which  in  its  fullest 
sense  obeys  this  high  behest  will  be  "  the  Church  of  the  fu- 
ture." The  problem,  therefore,  is,  Channels  every-where  for 
the  outflow  of  the  spirit  of  Christianity,  provisions  for  the 
certain  delivery  of  Christ's  "Gospel  to  every  creature." 

To  be  thoroughly  prepared  to  meet  her  proportion  of  these 
responsibilities  it  is  evident  that  the  Methodist  Church  must 
not  only  receive  frequent  and  powerful  Spirit-baptisms,  but 
must  realize  the  unobstructed  action  of  the  Holy  Ghost. 

Her  logic  must  be  spiritual  in  its  life,  wide  in  its  grasp,  and 
practical  in  its  tendencies. 

Thus  under  direction  of  both  rational  inspiration  and  in- 
spired logic  she  must  advance  rapidly  to  the  completion  of 
her  unity,  the  first  fact  of  which  will  be  to  render  available  to 
the  largest  practicable  extent  her  spirituality,  wisdom,  wealth, 
and  business  ability.  This  she  is  candidly  attempting.  To 
succeed  she  needs  to  see  distinctly  that  a  thoroughly  practical 
division  of  labor  docs  not  imply,  nor  admit  of,  organic  separa- 
tion, either  nominal  or  real.  Whatever  is  essential  to  Church 
Vitality  is  common  to  all,  and  must  never  in  any  part  of  it  be 
excluded  from  an}*  vitalizing  work.  We  take  the  word 
spirituality  to  represent  the  first  and  largest  indivisible  cle- 
ment of  aggressive  vitalizing  Church  power.  This  soul-life  of 
the  Church  is  from  the  Holy  Spirit,  and  is  self-propagating ; 


254  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Missioyi.         [April, 

it  must,  therefore,  live,  pray,  sing,  give,  speak,  and  vote  for 
the  salvation  of  souls.  It  follows  that  to  bring  us  to  the  high- 
est unity,  all  the  spirituality  of  the  Church  must  be  brought  to 
bear  upon  all  her  deliberations  and  work  for  the  extension  of 
the  Christian  life.  Any  practical  measure  from  which  the 
spiritual  power  of  any  portion  of  the  Church  is  excluded  is 
just  so  much  the  less  potential.  Now  to  combine  the  spiritual 
power  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  in,  her  great  acts  of 
legislation  under  the  Master,  she  must  bring  forward  that  vast 
amount  of  it  included  in  the  laity,  and  avail  herself  of  its 
renovating  influence  and  inspiring  love,  its  spiritual  insight 
and  missionary  zeal,  in  all  the  "rules  and  regulations"  made 
to  render  free  and  rapid  the  outflow  of  the  life  of  Christ  into 
this  dead  world.  It  is  evident  that  the  first  great  want  of  our 
law-making  deliberations  is  spiritualization ;  and -we  record  it 
as  our  profound  conviction  that  a  vast  accession  of  this  vital 
force  is  available,  and  is  moving  up  from  the  laity  to  take  its. 
place  in  the  highest,  most  responsible  working  body  -of  the 
Church.  Further,  in  all  deliberations  which  affect  the  status 
of  Church  members,  and  the  propagation  of  the  faith,  (and  we 
have  no  other,)  wisdom,  next  to  spirituality,  is  the  great  de- 
mand. But  the  line  which  distinguishes  the  ministry  from  the 
laity  does  not  indicate  in  the  slightest  degree  any  boundaries 
or  limitations  of  this  high  requisite  for  safe  or  aggressive  legis- 
lation. It  lies  largely  upon  both  sides.  It  is  one  of  the  per- 
vasive forces  of  the  Church.  To  dispense  with  it  as  it  exists 
in  either  the  ministry  or  laity  is  so  tar  to  diminish  the  power 
of  this  indispensable  agent  of  Church  development. 

Kow  the  grand  material  agent  which  is  available  to  spirit- 
ualized wisdom  in  carrying  out  its  plans  may  be  represented 
by  the  term  wealth.  This,  from  the  largest  to  the  smallest 
sums,  is  scattered  throughout  the  laity  and  the  ministry.  It 
is  required  in  every  enterprise  for  the  extension  of  the  Re- 
deemer's kingdom.  It  gets  its  position  of  power  not  by  force 
or  authority,  but  by  Christian  beneficence.  To  call  out  in 
largest  amounts  the  immense  treasures  which  God  has  in- 
trusted to  individual  Christians  for  the  evangelization  of  the 
world,  the  influences  which  inspire  confidence  must  reach  to 
the  extremities  of  the  Church,  and  the  combinations  which 
produce  unity  of  purpose  in  the  appropriations  of  these  funds, 


1SC9.]  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  255 

and  the  highest,  broadest  responsibility  in  their  administration, 
rausi  comprehend  the  givers.  Wealth  is  one  of  the  universals 
of  the  Church.  It  is  neither  of  the  ministry  nor  membership 
us  such,  so  neither  will  its  use  be  in  completed  unity. 

One  other  great  practical  force  which  we  must  mention 
may  be  termed  business  ability.  The  Church  has  become  a 
vast  business  organization.  She  must  not,  however,  secularize 
her  Christianity,  but  Christianize  her  secularity.  The  busi- 
ness talent  of  the  Church  is  not  restricted  nor  indicated  by 
classes.  jSTow  let  this  power  in  the  ministry  and  the  laity  be 
spiritualized,  and  meeting  at  all  points,  blend  in  the  largest, 
most  energetic  unity.  The  ecclesiastical  business  functions  of 
the  ministry  received,  from  necessity,  an  earlier  development 
than  that  of  the  laity,  and  it  may  be  admitted  that  the  inspi- 
rations of  the  ministry  have  in  this  field  carried  them  beyond 
the  supports  of  their  logic,  while  the  Church  business  inspira- 
tions of  the  people  are  behind  their  logic.  The  retiring  of  the 
former  to  their  logical  supports,  and  the  corresponding  advance 
of  the  latter  to  their  logical  demands,  are  necessary  to  the 
realization  of  the  most  commanding  business  unit}' ;  and  as 
both  these  are  the  conspicuous  and  inevitable  tendencies  of 
the  age,  the  party-form  of  our  problem  is  rapidly  dissolving. 
Our  outward  differences  are  being  thrown  off  by  the  healthy 
growth  of  onr  inward  vital  unity. 

Now  it  is  evidently  the  design  of  Providence  in  its  control  of 
Bfl  to  send  out  the  laborers  every- where,  thoroughly  imbued  with 
all  the  vitalizing  power,  and  in  command  of  all  the  practical 
forces,  common  to  the  whole  Church.  "We  are,  therefore, 
acting  in  harmony  with  Providence  when  we  are  seeking  to 
combine  into  one  grand  working  unity  all  the  spirituality, 
wisdom,  wealth,  and  business  ability  of  Methodism.  But  as 
this  cannot  be  done  by  aggregation  it  must  be  by  completed 
representation.  Men  coming  up  from  the  people  to  our  eccle- 
siastical bodies  must  bring  into  them  for  use  there,  and  render 
available  for  missionary  power,  all  the  great  moral  forces  which 
have  developed  in  our  growth.  Plans  for  the  realization  of 
this  grand  result  have  been  submitted  with  great  unanimity 
by  the  ministerial  representatives  of  these  four  unifying  forces 
to  the  laity  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church.  Let  them  be 
promptly  accepted  in  June  next,  and  our  representative  unity 


256  Methodism;    its  Method  and  Mission.         [April, 

in  spirituality,  wisdom,  wealth,  aixl  business  ability  will  be ' 
thus  completed. 

The  next  form  of  the  question  of  unity  is  one  of  administra- 
tion. Methodism  was  expected  to  prove  itself  unsound  in 
doctrine  because  it  did  not  formally,  at  first,  announce  a  creed  ; 
erratic  in  movement,  because  it  would  not  be  governed  by  tra- 
ditions from  the  dead  past;  and  temporary,  because  it  was  not 
robed  in  apostolic  vestments.  But  in  its  receptive  and  demon- 
strative liberty  were  the  hidings  of  its  power.  So  far  from 
becoming  latitudinarian  in  its  faith,  by  allowing  the  truths  it 
would  grasp  to  move  freely  among  themselves,  claim  their 
affinities,  and  record  their  own  definitions,  it  was  in  this  way 
only  that  it  received  the  clearest,  best  defined,  and  most  un- 
changeable system  of  doctrines  known  in  ecclesiastical  history. 
While,  therefore,  it  is  true  that  Wesleyan  Methodism  as  an 
organized  spiritual  movement  in  the  Church  of  England  de- 
manded no  subscription  to  an  inflexible  creed  as  a  condition  of 
membership  in  its  societies,  it  is  unhistorical  to  say  that  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church  has  no  binding  definitions  of  faith 
in  which  her  members  ought  to  agree.  For  the  very  reason 
that  our  doctrines  have  been  received  and  identified  by  the 
method  of  inspiration,  and  tested,  compiled,  and  published  by 
the  severest  logic,  they  are  fit  to  be  the  acknowledged  standards 
of  all  Christians,  however  spiritual  or  intellectual.  Method- 
ism is  "  Christianity  in  earnest  "  for  the  defense  and  propaga- 
tion of  all  forms  of  fundamental  truth,  dogmatical  as  well  as 
experimental.  This  is  historically  settled  as  included  in  our 
providential  mission  ;  and  for  this  very  purpose  our  system  of 
doctrine  has  been  produced  by  our  providential  method.  We 
dictate  no  faith,  but  we  teach  and  recognize  faith.  We  repu- 
diate hereditary  visible  Church  membership  because  it  would 
be  involuntary,  and  reject  contentious  heterodoxy  because  it 
is  disturbing  to  Church  order  and  ruinous  to  souls.  We 
guard  the  soundness  of  our  ministry  by  test  examinations  from 
probation  to  ordination,  solemnly  pledging  them  to  "banish 
and  drive  away  all  erroneous  and  strange  doctrines,"  because 
they  are  indoctrinating  teachers  of  responsible  disciples.  We 
have  an  undoubted  right  to  question  all  candidates  for  Church 
membership  as  to  their  belief  in  our  doctrines  because  suc- 
cessful organization  must  be  of  homogeneous  elements. 


1S09.1         Methodism ;  its  Method  and  Mission.  257 

It  must,  however,  be  admitted  that  we  have  been  unfortunate 
in  one  of  our  questions.*  Our  "Articles"  are  chiefly  an  expres- 
sion of  our  Protestant  and  free-will  faith  against  Popery  and  Cal- 
vinism. They  make  no  pretensions  to  be  an  exhaustive  state- 
ment of  "the  doctrines  of  Holy  Scripture,"  as  taught  by  '"the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church."  They  are  alone  neither  historic- 
ally, legally,  nor  popularly  the  standard  of  Methodist  doctrine. 
Candidates  are  confused,  rather  than  relieved,  by  the  restricted 
form  of  the  question,  many  of  them  showing  that  they  have 
never  mastered  the  phrase  "  Articles  of  Religion."  Ask  them 
directly  and  simply,  "Do  you  believe  in  the  doctrines  of  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church?"  and  they  will  all  answer 
promptly  and  heartily,  "Yes;"  for  they  do.  Let, this  more 
appropriate,  comprehensive  question  take  the  place,  as  soon  as 
practicable,  of  the  niueh  too  technical  and  scholastic  question 
we  now  have. 

This,  however,  by  the  way.  The  truth  is  to  be  firmly  seized 
that  the  providential  growth  and  informal  exposition  of  the 
fundamental  faith  of  Methodism  the  more  (not  the  less,  as  has 
been  claimed)  entitle  us  to  ascertain  the  essential  correctness 
in  belief  of  those  whom  we  admit  to  full  fellowship  in  the  con- 
stitution of  our  Church  unity,  and  iu  the  great  work  of  extend- 
ing the  truth  as  it  is  in  Jesus;  to  remove  disturbing  innovators 
and  opposers  from  our  membership ;  and  especially  to  depose 
ministers  who  insist  upon  the  right  of  misleading  our  people 
by  teaching  "erroneous  and  strange  doctrines,"  which  they 
have  solemnly  covenanted  to  "banish  and  drive  away:"  let 
those  men  join  other  branches  of  the  Christian  Church  if  any 
are  willing  to  receive  them,  with  the  understanding  that  they 
intend  to  take  in  with  them  the  right  of  being  "  carried  about 
hy  every  wind  of  doctrine,"  the  right  of  irresponsible  agitation 
and  revolution,  which  they  have  been  calmly  and  religiously 
denied  in  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church.  This  claim  rises 
directly  out  of  the  method  of  our  faith.  If  it  were  to  be  settled 
first  and  chiefly  by  logic,  then  "debates"  would  have  much 
"lure  plausible  ground  for  the  right  to  be  endless. 

We  go  further,  and  affirm  that  the  great  system  of  ethics 
Mid  practical  Christianity  known  as  "  the  General  Pules,"  is, 

*  "  I>o  you  believe  iu  the  doctrines  of  Holy  Scripture,  ns  set  forth  in  tlio  Articles 
°f  Religion  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  ?  "—Discipline,  1SG3,  p.  155. 


25S  Methodism  ;  its  Method  and  Mission.        [April, 

seen  from  the  same  stand-point,  to  be  of  binding  force,  and  to 
furnish  a  proper  basis  of  Church  discipline.  They  are  not 
speculative  or  optional.  They  come  of  inspiration,  and  our 
members  must  observe  them  or  forfeit  their  standing  among 
us.  "These  are  the  General  Rules  of  our  societies;  all  which 
we  are  taught  of  God  to  observe,  even  in  his  written  word, 
which  is  the  only  rule,  and  the  sufficient  rule,  both  of  our  faith 
and  practice.  And  all  these  we  know  his  Spirit  writes  on 
truly  awakened  hearts.  If  there  be  any  among  us  who  observe 
them  not,  who  habitually  break  any  of  them,  let  it  be  known 
unto  them  who  watch  over  that  soul  as  they  who  must  give 
an  account.  We  will  admonish  him  of  the  error  of  his  ways. 
"We  will  bear  with  him  for  a  season.  But  if  then  he  repent 
not,  he  hath  no  more  place  among  us.  We  have  delivered  our 
owu  souls." 

It  is,  in  the  same  light,  seen  to  be  an  error  to  presume  that 
because  our  Church  polity  and  government  became  not  in 
form  matters  of  direct  revelation,  they  are  therefore  not  of 
bindiug  force.  God  has  made  us  responsible  for  the  use  of 
illuminated  reason  in  the  settlement  of  discretionary  Church 
order,  and  oar  "Kules  and  Regulations"  when  made,  or  as 
amended  or  constitutionally  changed,  are  of  the  nature  of  a 
sacred  covenant  between  members  and  the  Church,  and  are  all 
binding  as  the  legitimate  results  of  responsible  liberty.  The 
Church  has  therefore  authority  in  its  high  discretion  to  require 
its  members  to  meet  in  class,  not  because  this  particular  form 
of  religious  conference  and  worship  is  named  in  the  Scriptures, 
but  because  to  her  is  committed  the  watch-care  of  souls,  and 
because  the  special  mode  of  doing  this  effectual^  is  left  in 
some  respects  to  her  discretion.  If  this  were  otherwise,  then 
nothing  in  prudential  church  order  is  binding.  But  the  apos- 
tolic command  is,  "  Obey  them  that  have  the  rule  over  you, 
and  submit  yourselves :  for  they  watch  for  your  souls,  as  they 
that  must  give  account,  that  they  may  do  it  with  joy,  and  not 
with  grief."  Let  this  law  become  a  nullity,  and  schism  and 
disorder  are  inevitable  and  without  remedy.  Let  our  Twenty- 
second  Article  define  the  duty  of  loyalty  and  the  highest  wis- 
dom in  church  prerogatives.  "It  is  not  necessary  that  rites 
and  ceremonies  should  in  all  places  be  the  same,  or  exactly 
alike,  for  they  have  been  always  different,  and  may  be  changed 


1869.]  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  259 

according  to  the  diversity  of  countries,  times,  and  men's  man- 
ners, so  that  nothing  be  ordained  against  God's  word.  Who- 
soever, through  his  private  judgment,  ■willingly  and  purposely 
doth  openly  break  the  rites  and  ceremonies  of  the  Church  to 
which  he  belongs,  which  are  not  repugnant  to  the  word  of 
God,  and  are  ordered  and  approved  by  common  authority, 
ought  to  be  rebuked  openly,  that  others  ma}r  fear  to  do  the 
like,  as  one  that  offendeth  against  the  common  order  of  the 
Church,  and  woundeth  the  consciences  of  weak  brethren." 
They  argue  erroneously,  therefore,  who  claim  discretionary 
license  for  Church  members  in  regard  to  Church  order  in 
prudential  matters.  A  wise  paternal  discipline,  based  upon 
the  principle  here  distinctly  brought  out,  has  been  for  years  the 
accumulating  want  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church.  Let 
the  fact  that  class  meetings  were  instituted  by  Providence, 
and  have  been  sustained  by  broad  and  invigorating  historical 
power, 'indicate  the  wrong  and  danger  of  negligence  in  regard 
to  them,  either  by  members  or  administrators.  They  are  the 
result  and  means  of  our  most  distinguishing  inspirations.  If 
it  bo  assumed  that  we  have  grown  to  such  immense  propor- 
tions as  to  render  our  former  administrative  unity  imprac- 
ticable, I  allege  exactly  the  contrary.  Xever  in  our  history 
could  we  with  so  much  strength  and  safety  as  now,  in  this  and 
all  other  respects,  prudently,  but  firmly,  return  to  the  Disci- 
pline. By  no  other  standard,  in  no  other  way,  can  we  be  one 
in  administration  or  marked  in  efficiency. 

Let  the  question  of  completed  unity  be  now  much  further 
extended.  The  equilibrium  between  the  aggressive  power  and 
receptive  capacity  of  the  Church  is  of  the  highest  moment. 
For  iustance,  when  the  missionary  force  brought  to  the  last 
General  Conference  Annual  Conferences  from  the  four  quar- 
ters of  the  globe,  the  representative  Church  looked  amazed  at 
her  trophies,  asked  where  to  put  them,  hesitated,  debated,  de- 
cided, and  they  moved  to  their  organic  position,  to  be  instant- 
ly felt  not  as  a  burden,  but  as  an  augmentation  of  aggressive 
power.  The  grandest  fact  of  that  great  assembly  was  the 
clear  demonstration  of  the  exact  equilibrium,  up  to  that  period, 
of  the  conservative  and  progressive  forces  of  the  Church. 

This  brings  us  naturally  to  the  great  qucstioii  which,  from 
our  large  increase  and  extension  must  soon  force  a  solution, 


260  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

How  can  one  General  Conference  be  composed  of  delegates 
from  all  parts  of  the  world,  and  one  administration  reach  and 
keep  in  order  ten  millions — twenty  millions — of  members,  and 
seventy-five  thousand — a  hundred  and  fifty  thousand — traveling 
ministers,  of  peoples  so  diverse  and  remote?  There  is  un- 
doubtedly a  strong  historical  relief  in  the  statement,  that  fifty 
years  ago,  the  question,  Can  one  administration  manage  sev- 
enty-two Conferences  and  a  million  of  members  in  America, 
Europe,  Asia,  and  Africa?  would  have  been  scarcely  less  start- 
ling. We  venture  the  additional  statement,  that  if  the  unob- 
structed movement  of  the  Gospel  requires  one  universal  Church, 
bringing  to  the  highest  available  power  at  any  given  point  all 
general  spiritual  agencies,  then  our  historical  equilibrium  of 
discipleship  and  government  may  be  extended  to  this  result 
as  easily  as  it  has  been  perfectly  preserved  in  a  rapid  progress 
of  a  hundred  years  directly  toward  it. 

But  to  grapple  with  this  great  question  in  its  most  formi- 
dable aspect,  let  it  be  stated  that  all  our  ecclesiastical  bodies 
are  adjustable  in  number,  constitution,  periodicity,  and  juris- 
diction. Let  us  now  suppose  a  Quarterly  Church  Conference, 
an  Annual  District  Conference,  a  Biennial  State  Conference, 
a  Quadrennial  National  Conference,  a  Sexennial  Judicial  Con- 
ference, and  an  Octennial  General  (Ecumenical)  Conference. 

As  this  plan  is  intended  only  to  show  that  the  grave  ques- 
tion before  us  admits  of  a  practical  solution,  I  do  not' propose 
to  encumber  it  with  details.  The  following  suggestions,  how- 
ever, may  assist  those  who  arc  inclined  to  give  it  a  candid  and 
thorough  examination : 

1.  This  would  concede  the  now  tolerably  well  settled  fact 
that  our  Annual  Conferences  must  be  composed  of  districts 
not  strictly  conformable  to  State  lines,  their  limits  being  de- 
termined by  business  and  religious  associations  and  unalterable 
physical  geography,  while  it  would  give' us  all  the  advantages 
of  complete  adjustment  to  all  the  civil  divisions  of  the  earth. 

2.  The  General  Conference  would  of  course  observe  strict 
fidelity  to  the  Discipline  in  constituting  these  several  bodies 
and  defining  their  powers.  It  would,  therefore,  be  not  revolu- 
tion, but  simple  development. 

3.  I  would  retain  the  present  disciplinary  membership  in 
the  Quarterly  and  Annual  Conferences,  and  also  make  the 


I  ki',;>.)  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  2G1 

Bitfhops  ex-officio  members  of  the  General  Conference.  The 
Judicial  Conference  would  of  course  be  composed  only  of  the 
jurors  of  the  parties  going  up  to  it  for  justice ;  but,  with  the 
i  [whops,  it  should  be  made  our  Constitutional  Judiciary.  Then 
the  delegated  membership  in  all  the  other  bodies  should  be  a 
lull  impartial  representation,  with  adjustable  pro  rata  numbers. 

•i.  The  functions  of  our  ecclesiastical  bodies  might  be  very 
much  simplified  by  admitting  suggestions  in  regard  to  each, 
coming  from  territorial  limitations,  and  by  a  natural  distinc- 
tion between  legislative,  judicial,  deliberative,  and  executive 
assemblies.  The  General  Conference  would  be  relieved  of 
appeals  and  constitutional  questions,  of  all  corrupting  elections, 
and  of  much  detaining  local  business,  and  become,  as  it  ought 
to  be,  the  depository  of  ultimate  power  for  the  conservation  of 
doctrine,  the  enactment  of  laws,  the  unification  and  efficiency 
of  administration,  and  the  spread  of  the  Gospel.  The  State 
and  National  Conferences  would  be  deliberative,  and  could 
conveniently  take  charge  of  such  business  matters,  in  connec- 
tion with  our  great  educational,  publishing,  and  other  interests, 
as  should  be  referred  to  them.  The  Annual  Conferences,  re- 
lieved of  anniversaries  and  many  inconvenient  business  details, 
could  become  more  efficiently  executive,  and  more  deeply 
spiritual. 

5.  Let  the  idea  of  a  ubiquitous  "  general  itinerant  superin- 
tendency"  be  fully  realized.  This  does  not  require  a  large 
increase  of  the  number  of  Bishops,  which  for  economical  and 
connectional  reasons  will  generally  be  admitted  to  be  inexpe- 
dient ;  nor  diocesan  episcopacy,  which  would  destroy  our  itin- 
erancy. Let  our  Episcopacy  remain  in  jurisdictional  authority 
entirely  indivisible,  as  though  it  were  in  one  universal  Bishop. 
The  genius  of  our  Church  polity  requires  it,  and  there  is  abso- 
lutely no  other  way  of  realizing  administrative  unity  in  un- 
limited extension. 

There  is,  however,  a  power  for  good,  partly  personal  and 
partly  of  office,  which  appertains  to  the  Episcopal  presence 
and  labors  which  ought  to  be  fairly  distributed,  and  which, 
nkc  all  other  pastoral  functions,  absolutely  demands  assignable 
limits  for  its  most  effective  application.  This  is  inevitably 
localized,  and  its  area  largely  determined  by  the  residence  of 
the  Bishop.      Let,  then,  the   General  Conference  divide  our 

l^ouimi  Sekiks,  Vol.  XXL— 17 


2G2  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

whole  territory  into  as  many  districts  as  there  are  effective 
Bishops,  and  direct  that  one  shall  reside  in  each  district,  to  ex- 
change within  a  prescribed  period,  leaving  jurisdiction  and  the 
distribution  of  administrative  labor  precisely  as  they  now  are. 
This,  with  a  pro  rata  increase  of  numbers,  and  a  provision  for 
honorably  relieving  from  the  office  all  who,  for  any  reason,  are 
incompetent  to  perform  its  duties,  that  they  may  return  to  the 
body  of  the  eldership  to  which  they  belong,  in  such  Conference 
as  they  may  choose,  will  raise  the  Methodist.  Episcopacy  to  its 
highest  practicable  efficiency,  and  preserve  intact  the  prin- 
ciples on  which  it  rests. 

Then  let  the  Presiding  Eldership  be  extended  in  its  scope 
and  exalted  in  its  personnel  so  as  to  be,  in  the  "general  itin- 
erant superintendency,"  the  exact  complement  of  the  Epis- 
copacy. Thus  that  completeness  of  official  supervision  will  be 
secured,  which  is  attempted  by  the  Protestant  Episcopal 
Church  by  the  multiplication  of  Diocesan  Bishops — officers  in 
practical  rank,  more  analogous  to  the  Presiding  Elders  than  to 
the  Bishops  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church,  a  fact  which 
will  be  more  evident  when  their  status  is  further  defined  by 
the  ordination  of  Metropolitans  above  them. 

This  completes  one  attempt  to  show  that  our  capacity  for 
homogeneous  assimilation  and  governmental  unity  may  be 
kept  exactly  equal  to  our  extension,  in  fulfillment  of  our  great 
commission  to  go  into  all  the  world  and  disciple  all  nations. 
Let  us  now  advance  to  another. 

The  spiritual  is  the  vital,  indestructible  element  of  the 
Church.  So  far  as  it  is  material,  secular,  or  economical,  it  is 
adjustable  ;  but  in  its  divine  life  it  is  like  God,  and  can  neither 
be  destroyed  nor  changed.  Precisely  here  appears  the  grand 
mistake  of  many  religious  propagandists.  They  seek  to  ren- 
der forms  immutable  and  universal.  In  these  attempts  the 
moral  exhausts  itself  and  tails,  and  prerogative,  vainly  endeav- 
oring to  supply  its  place  and  accomplish  the  impossible,  pushes 
itself  into  force,  and  fails  also.  There  is  no  infallibility  nor  uni- 
versality informs,  and  yet  in  forms  large  portions  of  even  the 
Christian  world  are  still  struggling  to  realize  them.  The  Latin 
and  the  Greek  Churches  are  notable  examples  of  this  stupen- 
dous folly.  Protestantism,  so  far  as  it  attempts  to  follow  them 
is,  like  them,  "  a  failure."     Of  this  the  Ritualists  of  the  Epis- 


1SG0.]  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  263 

copal  Church  in  England  and  America  are  just  now  the  most 
conspicuous  and  mournful  instances. 

Here  let  us  gratefully  acknowledge  the  maimer  in  which  God 
hath  made  us  to  differ  from  all  other  Churches.  The  Roman 
Church,  by  setting  aside  the  illimitable,  and  devoting  its  para- 
mount energies  to  the  necessarily  limited,  has  proved  histori- 
cally that  it  can  never  become  catholic.  The  Methodists  at 
the  very  first  firmly  grasped  the  illimitable,  and  hold  on  to  it, 
assigning  the  limited  and  the  variable  to  its  adjustable  position. 
Successional  Episcopalianism,  substituting  tradition  for  history, 
undertook  to  realize  universality  in  an  illiterate  mistake. 
Methodism  rejected  the  inevitably  limitating  error,  and  accepted 
an  adjustable,  and  therefore  an  effective  Episcopacy.  Presby- 
terianism  grasped  the  true  apostolic  ordination,  but  rejected  all 
Episcopacy,  and  thus  missed  an  indispensable  unifying  direction. 
Methodism  accepted  presbyterial  ordination,  and  thus  became 
hi.-torical  and  flexible,  while  it  received  Episcopacy  without  its 
fictions,  and  is  hence  commanded,  in  a  unified  spiritual  effi- 
ciency, unparalleled  in  the  history  of  the  world.  Congrega- 
tionalism made  a  center  of  the  localizing  idea.  Methodism 
seized  the  connectional  idea,  and  adopted  the  itinerancy,  and 
thus  became  the  fullest  and  most  vitalized  embodiment  among 
men  of  the  grand  apostolic  commission.  The  Baptists,  guided 
by  an  exegesis,  nnsustained  by  the  criticisms  and  historical 
reading  of  a  large  majority  of  the  Christian  world,  made  adult 
modal  baptism  a  controlling  idea;  restricted  communion  fol- 
lowed, and  all  rational  hope  of  universality  was  sacrificed. 
The  Methodists  took  the  water  emblem  to  symbolize  the  bap- 
tism of  the  Holy  Ghost,  the  "one  baptism,"  and  thus  reached 
catholicity  in  both  the  sacraments. 

Finally,  while  nearly  all  other  evangelical  denominations, 
adopting  limiting  principles  of  exegesis,  became  Necessarians 
in  theology,  -and  were  logically  driven  either  to  a  limited 
atonement  and  a  partial  salvation  or  the  irreconcilable  contra- 
dictions of  responsible  freedom  and  absolute  foreordination, 
thus  compelling  the  extensive  rejection  of  their  scheme  by  the 
common  sense  of  the  people,  the  Methodists  were  conducted 
by  broad  general  principles  of  interpretation  to  personal  lib- 
erty, and  a  "  free  and  full  salvation,"  all  of  which  the  common 
judgment  of  mankind  declares  ought  to  be  true — is  true. 


264  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

In  view  of  the  whole  we  are  compelled  to  admit,  and  we 
should  do.it  with  trembling,  that  Methodism  alone  has  become 
capable  of  practically  demonstrating  the  universal  preroga- 
tives and  destination  of  the  visible  Church  in  one  organic 
body. 

Advancing  from  her  present  position  in  the  honest  endeavor 
to  fulfill  her  great  mission,  Methodism  will  find  her  larger  uni- 
ties. Her  inspirations  must  proceed  with  their  organization. 
Her  forms  separate  her  activities — her  spirit  must  combine 
them.  This  spirit  is  not  wholly  the  divine,  nor  wholly  the 
human,  but  the  resultant  of  both.  The  Infinite  Vitality  acts 
upon  the  finite  in  regeneration,  and  develops  a  mixed  life — a 
very  live  thing  called  Methodism.  jSTow  as  the  human  pre- 
dominates we  divide,  as  the  Divine  predominates  we  unite. 
We  do  not,  therefore,  direct  attention  first  to  logical  efforts,  but 
to  the  inner  spiritual  force,  to  effect  larger  organic  combina- 
tions. Hence  we  say  our  inspirations  must  go  on  with  their 
organizations.  The  truly  Methodistic  soul  of  Methodism, 
giving  fuller,  freer  scope  to  the  Divine,  must  work  out  the 
human — namely,  ignorance,  selfishness,  and  prejudice — and 
realize  its  external  from  its  internal  unity.  This  is  not  specu- 
lation, but  providence,  history,  and  prophecy.  The  identity 
of  the  Methodist  spirit  throughout  the  world  is  moving  her 
numerous  bodies  cautiously  but  evidently  toward  each  other, 
and  at  no  very  distant  day  this  vital  progressive  power  will 
inevitably  master  geography  and  caste,  and  we  shall  reach 
organic  unity  for  our  mission  to  "  all  nations  "  in  one  grand 
representative  council,  and  a  practically  unified  administration. 
The  discovery  (uncovering)  of  one  broad  potential  fact  here- 
tofore hardly  known  to  exist,  will  hasten  this  grand  consum- 
mation :  we  mean  the  real  identity  of  Methodist  executive 
authority,  in  all  its  forms,  throughout  the  world.  That  iden- 
tity consists  in  the  complete  responsibility  of  personal  liberty 
to  connectional  authority.  This,  in  some  of  its  various  ways, 
commands  the  ministry,  and  gives  the  Gospel  to  the  people ; 
and  it  is  the  only  form  of  executive  authority  on  the  globe 
which  reaches  this  result  with  absolute  certainty.  Now  whether 
this  administrative  authority  is  ostensibly  in  a  bench  of  Bish- 
ops, distributed  and  surrounded  by  a  council  of  Presiding 
Elders,  or  in  an  Annual  Presidency  and  Stationing  Committee, 


(869.1  Methodism  :  its  Method  and  Mission.  265 

—whether  preparatory  representation  and  measures  are  from  the 
people  through  Quarterly  Conferences  or  District  Meetings,  the 
great  facts  are  every-where  the  same,  a  willing  people,  a  loyal 
ministry  to  obey,  and  somebody  to  command  them.  The  result 
is  a  ubiquitous,  live  itinerancy.  In  this  all  Methodist  executive 
authority  culminates.  Its  forms  are  equally  adjustable  to  local 
civil  institutions  and  to  connectional  demands,  and  this  is  all 
that  organic  unity  requires.  The  best  of  its  forms  must  be  that 
which,  under  discipline,  is  most  effective  in  molding,  concen- 
trating, and  using  the  intelligence  and  will  of  the  people,  antic- 
ipating their  wants,  and  promptly  overcoming  all  the  obstacles 
which  human  sin  and  folly  have  thrown  in  the  way  of  their 
full  supply.  This  will  probably  be  found  to  be  full  represen- 
tation, and  a  powerful  responsible  Episcopacy.  But  we  do 
most  confidently  submit  that  whatever  may  be  its  form,  the  fact 
that  it  is  even  now  essentially  one  in  principle  and  result 
greatly  simplifies  all  our  problems  of  organic  unity. 

Let  us  now  step  out  a  little  further.  Passing  beyond  exter- 
nal organisms  into  the  Christian  life,  and  losing  our  denomina- 
tional egotism  in  the  soul  of  our  common  Christianity,  we  find 
our  brethren  of  the  catholic  faith  every-where  advancing  to 
meet  us  in  one  holy  mission  of  "  peace  on  earth  and  good-will 
to  men."  Here  we  have  a  unity,  vitally  organic,  of  immense 
working  power;  and  it  is  charming  to  see  how  grandly  this 
inward  unity  is,  in  our  day,  developing  in  outward  harmony 
and  aggressive  labor.  In  the  fires  of  the  Spirit  how  rapidly 
sectarian  bigotries  are  dissolving,  theologies  simplifying,  and 
great  souls  combining  to  grapple  with  giant  iniquities,  and 
spread  every-where  the  power  of  a  free  and  a  full  salvation  ! 
It  is  not  necessary  for  us  to  identify  and  claim  the  Methodist 
spirit  in  the  warm,  joyous  outgoing  freedom  of  the  live  Churches 
of  to-day.  Our  brethren  and  history  will  accord  us  all  that  our 
humility  will  bear.  It  is  only  necessary  here  to  say,  that  if 
God  shall  make  us  in  any  sense  u  the  Church  of  the  future," 
it  will  be  through  and  by  all  other  Churches.  Let  us,  there- 
fore, draw  them  more  closely  to  us,  and  with  loving  justice 
acknowledge  and  honor  their  evangelical  power. 

Looking  carefully  over  the  whole  field  we  may  clearly  see, 
and  without  reservation  say,  that  whether  in  one  organization 
or  several,  by  attracting  other  ecclesiastical  bodies  to  herself  or 


266  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

pouring  her  life  current  through  them,  the  mission  of  Method- 
ism is  to  demonstrate  the  universal  prerogatives  and  destina- 
tion of  the  spiritual  element  in  religion.  But  we  have  found 
administrative  Methodism  perfectly  adjustable  to  this  grand  and 
glorious  mission,  and  therefore  capable  of  embodying  this  vital 
element,  and  rendering  it  objective  and  sovereign  in  every 
form  of  life,  in  every  place,  over  the  globe.  This  is  its  pre- 
rogative, this  its  destination. 

We  -now  venture  'nothing  in  asserting  that  this  really  super- 
natural  adaptation  is  the  result  of  inspirations  from  the  All-vi- 
talizing Infinite  Power.  It  could  never  have  ueen  'produced 
ly  human  reason,  though  the  severest  logic  vindicates  it. 

We  thus  conclude  our  search  for  the  method  of  Methodism. 
"We  have  found  that,  in  some  high  and  important  sense,  inspira- 
tion has  been  first  in  order  of  time,  and  alone  as  a  vitalizing 
force,  in  giving  to  Methodism  a  pure  system  of  doctrines,  a  wise 
Church  polity,  an  experimental  missionary  energy,  a  broadly- 
just  civilizing  power,  and  an  administrative  ability  capable  of 
indefinite  expansion  and  indissoluble  organic  unity.  We  are 
therefore  entitled  to  our  conclusion  : 

The  method  of  Methodism  is  inspieation,  in  distinc- 
tion FEOM    LOGIC. 

Let  us  here,  in  a  few  words,  fix  our  sense  of  the  term  inspira- 
tion. The  inspiration  of  authoritative  revelation  for  the  race 
was  pure  truth,  accompanied  by  a  miraculous  suspension  or  con- 
trol of  the  imperfect  human,  while  the  inspiration  available  to 
all  good  men  is  pure  truth,  without  miraculous  suspension  or 
control.  It  follows  that  the  one  is  subjectively  infallible  and 
objectively  true,  while  the  other  remains  subjectively  fallible 
and  may  be  objectively  untrue.  Hence  the  clearness  of  Divine 
wisdom  in  holding  the  fallible  judgment  subject  to  the  infalli- 
ble revelation.  Here  also  appears  the  value  of  one  of  our  most 
sacred  precedents.  Our  venerated  founder,  though  a  man  of 
the  broadest  scholarship  and  the  purest  inspirations,  became  at 
length,  in  submissiveness  and  docility,  "  homo  unius  libri"  a 
man  of  one  book. 

Concerning  the  future  our  method  and  our  history  teach  us 
soundly.  Recognizing  inspiration  as  first  in  time  and  rank,  we 
must  have  the  Holy  Ghost  in  renovating,  sanctifying,  directing 
power  always,  every-where.     Without  this  we  shall  be  worldly, 


1SG9.]  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Missicn.  2G7 

vain,  dead.  We  must  also  give  ample  scope  to  the  power  of 
logic.  Without  this  our  zeal  will  become  fanaticism.  Illumi- 
nated rcasoy  must  sit  in  judgment  ou  the  promptings  of  our 
funis,  deeply  moved  by  the  Spirit  of  God.  It  must  be  hence- 
fur  ward  more  thorough  in  its  scrutinies  aud  impartial  in  its 
judgments.  It  must  retrace  our  history,  to  remind  us  con- 
Btantly  aud  forcibly  that  not  numbers,  or  wealth,  or  popular 
influence,  but  spirituality,  humility,  holiness  has  been  the 
measure  of  our  power.  If  we  dare  to  lay  aside  our  humble 
(rust  in  the  Redeemer  alone,  for  self-seeking  and  worldly  glory, 
it  should  thunder  in  our  ears  the  rebuke  of  Paul  to  the  Gala- 
tians:  "Are  ye  so  foolish?  Having  begun  in  the  Spirit  are  ye 
now  made  perfect  by  the  flesh  '?"  We  know  that  our  inspira- 
tions, directed  by  logic,  have' built  schools  aud  colleges,  driven 
the  press,  founded  missions,  erected  churches,  and  organized 
Conferences ;  but  our  spirituality  lost,  no  amount  of  wealth, 
numbers,  or  popular  influence  could  restore  it.  We  therefore 
know  absolutely  that  we  cannot  reverse  the  method  by  which 
we  have  risen  to  greatness  as  a  Christian  power.  We  are  com- 
manded by  the  voice  of  Providence  to  pass  on  into  the  future 
with  it  unchanged. 

We  are  a  large  and  rapidly-increasing  number  of  the  most 
prosperous  citizens  of  this  Republic,  and  marked  increase  in 
wealth  and  cultivation  must  be  inevitable.  How  strong,  there- 
fore, the  temptation  to  extravagance  in  every  thing,  and  espe- 
cially in  church  building.  There  is  certainly  no  sin  in  the 
beauty  of  form  or  color.  It  is  not  even  human,  but  evidently 
divine  in  its  creation,  and  in  the  refined  sensitiveness  which 
renders  us  susceptible  of  esthetic  enjoyment  and  expression. 
But  there  are  limits  to  the  proper  use  of  money  in  the  adorn- 
ments of  our  persons  and  houses,  the  expensiveness  of  enter- 
tainments, and  the  splendor  of  church  architecture.  We  must 
check  our  extravagance,  or  in  our  oncoming  future  exchange 
a  spiritual  for  a  material  Christianity.  All  Christian  culture 
and  social  accomplishments  belong  as  legitimately  to  Method- 
Wb  as  to  other  people,  but  our  method  and  history  forbid  us 
to  advance  a  step  in  the  direction  of  balls,  theaters,  operas, 
Cards,  the  cup,  or  any  of  their  kindred  "  pleasures."  In  them- 
lelves  or  .associations  they  are.  historically  shown  to  be  of  the 
nature  of  sin,  the  chosen  indulgences  of  unpardoned  sinners, 


268  Methodism:  its  Method  and  Mission.  [April, 

including  the  vilest  of  men  and  the  most  degraded  of  women. 
We  cannot  use  them  "in  the  name  of  the  Lord  Jesus;"  we 
therefore  cannot  use  them  and  be  Methodists.  We  are  to  tcacli 
a  joyous,  but  self-denying,  heavenly-minded  Christianity.  We 
were  raised  up  "  to  spread  scriptural  holiness  over  all  lands." 
We  must  prudently,  but  firmly,  arrest  our  tendencies  to  worldly 
conformity,  or  fail  to  accomplish  this  mission.  We  shall  con- 
tinue to  build  magnificent  churches,  endow  institutions  of  learn- 
ing, and  pass  up  into  positions  of  high  trust  and  responsibility ; 
but  from  our  method  of  development  we  can  see  clearly  that  our 
only  safety  in  all  this  will  be  in  taking  with  us  our  original 
power,  to  inspire  the  worship  offered  in  our  most  splendid  as 
well  as  humblest  church  edifices,  to  give  purity  to  our  motives, 
breadth  to  our  principles,  and  elevation  to  our  leadership  in 
Church  and  State.  Migration  is  not  progress.  We  could  be- 
come neither  great  nor  strong-by  leaving  the  frontier  for  the 
city,  the  poor  to  take  care  of  the  wealthy,  or  our  primitive  sim- 
plicity for  learning.  But  to  retain  all  our  humility,  and  reach, 
with  the  power  of  resurrection,  the  very  lowest  and  poorest  of 
men,  while  we  rise  to  the  highest  heights  in  scholarly  wisdom 
and  esthetic  culture,  advance  with  the  foremost  in  business  en- 
ergy and  success,  and  gather  in  the  highest  in  social  position, 
is  progress.  We  must  therefore  go  on  as  we  began,  to  preach 
the  Gospel  to  sinners  wherever  we  can  find  them,  in  private 
rooms,  in  barns  and  school-houses,  in  the  streets  and  in  the 
groves,  as  well  as  in  more  convenient  and  superb  edifices.  We 
should  give  due  attention  to  the  call  of  the  Church  and  the  order 
of  discipline  in  the  appointment  and  ordination  of  men  to  the 
sacred  office,  but  we  must  not  wait  for  this  before  we  try  to 
save  sinners.  We  should  recognize,  and  hail  with  tears  of  grati- 
tude and  joy,  the  Gospel  entreaties  of  the  young  convert  when 
in  broken  accents  he  begs  his  companions  to  come  to  Jesus. 
We  must  multiply  our  Exhorters,  Local  Preachers,  and  itiner- 
ant Ministers  by  thousands,  pushing  them  into  every  open 
door  to  proclaim  to  the  vilest  and  poorest  as  well  as  to  the  highest 
and  richest  of  men  the  "  unsearchable  riches  of  Christ ;"  and 
we  must  include  a  meaning  deeper  and  higher  every  yenr  when 
we  ask  our  candidates  for  holy  orders,  "Do  you  trust  that  you 
are  moved  by  the  Holy  Ghost  to  take  upon  you"  this  sacred 
office?    With  this  we  should  urge  forward  our  ministers,  young 


1SC9.]  Methodism :  its  Method  and  Mission.  269 

and  old,  in  all  scholarly  attainments.  Our  theological  schools 
— few,  let  us  trust,  but  strong  and  very  spiritual — will  perform 
a  high  function  in  preparing  men  for  the  whole  field.  If,  how- 
ever, we  make  them  supersede  our  historical  method  of  inspi- 
ration they  will  not  be  addition  or  progress  but  change,  in  the 
direction  of  narrowness  and  not  of  breadth.  "While  our  popu- 
lation is  rushing  up  and  outward  in  such  bewildering  numbers, 
and  sinners  in  countless  thousands  are  sinking  to  hell,  we  can- 
not, will  not  wait  for  conventional  training  nor  the  reaching 
of  high  scholastic  standards  before  permitting  our  young  men  to 
cry,  "  Behold  the  Lamb  ! :'  In  other  acts  of  holy  worship  \vc 
must  go  on  to  do  as  we  began.  We  must  pray  first  and  then 
learn  to  pray.  We  must  sing  first  and  then  learn  to  sing.  We 
must  teach  our  young  converts  by  no  means  to  wait  for  study 
of  speech  or  forms  of  prayer,  but  with  glowing  love  and  con- 
quering faith  to  begin  at  once  to  plead  with  God  for  the  con- 
version of  souls.  Our  singing  must  not  be  limited  to  science  nor 
restrained  by  instruments,  but  our  joyous  melodies  and  ringing 
choruses  must  roll  out  from  warm,  gushing  hearts,  sending  the 
inspirations  of  spiritual  life  and  power  thrilling  deep  down  into 
the  hearts  of  common  sinners,  moralists,  formalists,  and  infidels 
alike.  Then  let  the  highest  culture  increase  the  breadth  and 
discrimination  of  importunate  prayer,  and  give  accuracy  and 
taste  in  musical  science  and  art.  This  is  the  method  of  inspi- 
ration, and  it  is,  we  insist,  as  exact  Methodism  as  apostolic 
Christianity  to  say  truthfully,  "  I  will  pray  with  the  spirit  and 
I  will  pray  with  the  understanding  also ;  I  will  sing  with  the 
spirit  and  I  will  sing  with  the  understanding  also." 

Let  us  then  move  forward  in  our  own  method  to  the  accom- 
plishment of  our  mission,  thus  rendering  illustrious  and  true 
for  his  apostolic  successors,  scattered  abroad  every-where,  hut 
one  and  inseparable,  the  heroic  announcement  of  Wesley, 
"  The  world  is  my  parish." 


270  Theodicy.  [April, 


Aet.  VI.— THEODICY. 

Redeemer  and  Redeemed:  An  Investigation  of  the  Atonement  and  of  Eternal 
Judgment.  By  Charles  Beechek,  Georgetown,  Massachusetts.  Boston :  Lee 
&  Shepard.     1864. 

The  key  to  this  remarkable  book  is  to  be  found  in  the  au- 
thor's experience,  in  early  life,  of  the  severities  of  the  Calvinistic 
creed,  as  described  in  the  preface:.  "  I  -can  remember  grave 
homilies  on  total  depravity,  and  other  abstruse  doctrines,  when 
I  could  not  have  been  above  six  or  seven  years  old.  '  Henry,* 
do  you  know  that  every  breath  you  draw  is  sin  ?  Well,  it  is, 
every  breath  ! '  There  was  a  profound  satisfaction  in  being 
thorough,  even  in  those  early  days,  that  I  have  not  yet  entirely 
outgrown.  The  severity  of  the  conception  did  not  appall  me 
in  the  least,  while  its  terrible  radicalism  was  irresistibly  fas- 
cinating." .  .  .  "The  origin  of  evil,  the  freedom  of  the  will, 
and  similar  subjects,  absorbed  me,  and  I  abandoned  myself  to 
them.  They  brought  me  to  grief,  but  I  cared  not ;  they  threw 
me  into  collision  with  my  father,  but  I  could  not  ignore  them. 
For  a  time  they  wrecked,  temporarily,  and  threatened  ship- 
wreck eternal,  but  I  could  not  forego  them."  ..."  That  man 
was  a  fallen,  ruined  race,  born  under  a  just  wrath  of  God  aud 
curse  of  a  holy  law,  I  was  equally  certain.  That  Christ's  death 
was  necessary  to  man's  salvation  was  to  me  self-evident.  But 
why  the  blood  of  Christ  should  be  necessary,  or  what  connec- 
tion it  had  with  forgiveness,  or  how  it  operated  to  secure  it, 
I  knew  not."  ..."  On  that  problem  my  mind  has  worked 
and  struggled  and  agonized,  day  and  night,  for  twenty  years 
almost  incessantly,  and  has  found  rest  in  the  views  presented 
in  this  volume." 

The  scheme  to  which  the  author's  investigations  conducted 
him  is  the  following ;  it  is  derived  from  the  Holy  Scriptures 
by  blending  literal  and  allegorical  interpretations  of  numerous 
passages  : 

1.  That  sin,  though  theologically  unaccountable  as  to  its 
origin,  had  historically  its  beginning  in  the  mind  of  Lucifer. 
The  king  of  Tyre,  in  E/.ekicl  xxviii,  was  but  an  emblem  of 
Satan,  whose  exaltation,  temptation,  and  fall  is  the  principal 
object  of  the  prophetic  vision.  "Such,"  he  says,  "was  the 
*  The  Author's  brother,  Henry  Ward  Bcechcr. 


1869J  Theodicy.  271 

view  of  Augustine,  Jerome,  Tertullian,  Ambrose,  and  other 
earlv  fathers.  Indeed,  Fairbairn  remarks,  'Most  of  the  early 
commentators  have  supposed  that,  verses  12-14  were  not  prop- 
erly used  of  the  king  of  Tyre,  but  mystically  of  Satan.'  At 
the  same  time  Fairbairn  characterizes  this  as  an  arbitrary  mode 
of  interpretation.  Arbitrary  or  not,  however,  it  is  a  mode 
that  has  commended  itself  to  the  mind  of  the  Church  for  ages 
as  well-nigh  self-evident.  As  an  illustration,  let.  it  be  remem- 
bered that  the  title  Lucifer,  now  universally  current  as  a  proper 
appellation  of  Satan,  owes  its  application  to  him  wholly  to  this 
method  applied  to  Isaiah  xiv,  12,  '  How  art  thou  fallen  from 
heaven,  O  Lucifer,  son  of  the  morning!'" 

The  primary  sin,  according  to  our  author,  was  pride.  This 
was  followed  by  unholy  ambition  to  be  independent  of  Divine 
control ;  then  came  corruption  and  malfeasance  in  his  office  as 
prime  minister  of  heaven  ;  then  the  seduction  of  inferior  and 
subordinate  angels ;  then,  after  all,  when  man  was  created  in 
heaven  to  supersede  in  due  time  the  revolting  angelic  hosts, 
the  seduction  of  mankind  and  their  destruction,  which  Satan 
believed  and  proclaimed  to  be  irremediable,  because  God  had 
no  prerogative  of  pardon  for  such  rebels. 

2.  The  pre-existence  of  man  he  assumes  as  already  proved 
by  the  learned  and  able  work  of  his  brother,  Dr.  Edward 
Beecher  ;  but  he  exonerates  him  from  all  responsibility  for  the 
peculiar  views  maintained  in  the  present  book.  He  disposes 
of  St.  Paul's  observation  on  the  fall  of  man,  Romans  v,  12-19, 
as  follows:  "Instead  of  saying,  'By  one  man  righteousness 
entered  into  the  world,  and  was  forfeited  and  lust,'  he  says,  '  By 
one  man  sin  entered  into  the  world ;'  tjiat  is,  when  he  entered  sin 
entered."  ..."  The  only  expression  which  could  be  thought  to 
favor  the  common  view  is,  '  By  one  man's  disobedience  many 
were  made  sinners.5  But  how  made  ?  Not  by  the  fall  of  a 
righteous  man,  but  by  the  test  appliedUo  an  unrighteous  man 
taken  as  an  average  sample.  Out  of  a  thousand  bushels  of 
wheat  one  bushel  being  taken,  as  a  fair  sample  or  specimen, 
and  found  to  be  damaged,  makes  the  whole  damaged."  lie 
refers  to  the  ;;  Conflict  of  Ages  "  for  a  full  exegesis  of  this  pas- 
sage, which,  in  his  opinion,  no  one  has  yet  refuted  or  can  re- 
fute. Hi3  doctrine  is,  that  the  human  race  was  created  in 
heaven,  to  supersede  in  due  time  the  Satanic  race;  and  that 


272  Theodicy.  [April, 

Lucifer,  discovering  this,  set  about  seducing  the  human  race, 
and  succeeded  in  Ins  fell  purpose,  with  the  solitary  exception 
of  one,  Jesus  Christ,  who,  like  Abdiel,  in  Milton's  fall  of  the 
angels  in  heaven,  remained  faithful. 

"  Faithful  found 
Among  the  faithless,  faithful  only  he." 

Him  the  second  Person  in  the  Trinity  took  into  personal 
union  with  himself,  and  he  became  the  Son  of  God,  and  inter- 
posed in  behalf  of  the  seduced  race.  Special  compassion  was 
felt  for  fallen  man  on  account  of  his  temptation  by  Lucifer, 
and  he  was  granted  another  probation.  For  this  purpose  the 
earth  was  prepared,  and  these  sinful  beings  have  been,  and  will 
still  be,  one  after  another,  sent  down  into  material  bodies  to 
have  an  opportunity,  under  very  favorable  circumstances,  to 
recover  their  original  righteousness. 

3.  He  argues  that  God  did  not  immediately  cast  Lucifer 
down  from  heaven,  because  he  is  a  God  of  infinite  love  and 
mercy.  He  had  a  special  love  for  Lucifer  as  the  first  and 
highest  of  all  created  beings,  and  he  sought  by  forbearance 
and  kindness  to  reclaim  him.  Having  the  absolute  prerogative 
of  pardoning  the  penitent,  as  was  proclaimed  on  Mount  Sinai 
at  the  time  of  the  giving  of  the  law  to  man,  "The  Lord  God, 
merciful  and  gracious,  slow  to  anger,  forgiving  iniquity,  trans- 
gression, and  sin ;"  he  hoped  to  see  him  become  penitent  and 
obedient.  Moreover,  holding  empire  over  intelligent  moral 
beings,  it  behooved  him  to  proceed  in  disposing  of  Satan  in  a 
way  to  satisfy  all  that  his  decrees  were  just  and  right.  This 
is  the  course  which  an  earthly  parent  or  a  wise  and  benevo- 
lent monarch  would  take  in  such  a  case.  A  mistaken  theol- 
ogy seeks  to  make  the  heavenly  Father  too  absolute  in  his  ad- 
ministration of  justice,  not  considering  that  he  must  have 
respect  to  the  laws  and  habits  of  mind  when  he  rules  in  the 
realm  of  mind  and  not  6f  matter. 

Mr.  Beecher  carries  out  these  principles  in  his  explanation 
of  the  atonement  and  of  eternal  punishment.  Christ  died  to 
illustrate  the  malignity  of  Satan,  and  morally  to  overthrow  his 
ascendency  in  heaven  over  the  confidence  and  affections  of  the 
heavenly  hosts.  God  offers  forgiveness  yet  to  lost  men  and 
devils  on  condition  of  repentance,  and  he  will  always  do  so. 
They  only  are  to  blame  for  the  perpetuation  of  their  misery 


HJ09J  Theodicy.  273 

because  they  will  not  repent.  In  this  be  differs  from  the  Uni- 
rerealifits  only  in  supposing  that  after  the  present  probationary 
life  uo  condemned  person  will  ever  choose  to  forsake  his  evil 
ways;  while  they  hold,  that  God  cannot  fail  in  finally  securing 
the  submission  and  repentance  of  every  apostate  soul. 

-1.  In  due  time  Adam  appears  in  Eden,  and  his  posterity  fol- 
low, born  of  him  only  as  it  respects  the  flesh,  and  with  such 
depraved  traits  of  mind  as  the  Bible  ascribes  to  mankind. 
Alter  four  thousand  years  Christ  too  is  born  of  a  woman,  and 
commences  his  redeeming  work.  Satan  and  his  angels  are  al- 
lowed to  assault  and  tempt  man  in  his  new  probation,  and  all 
his  malignity  of  cunning  is  exerted  to  seduce  the  Son  of  God. 
Failing  to  seduce  or  terrify  the  Redeemer,  he  tempts  wicked 
men  to  put  him  to  death.  But  Christ  rises  and  appears  in 
heaven,  and  confronts  Lucifer,  and  by  his  exposure  of  his  char- 
acter and  malicious  works  he  sets  all  heaven  against  him.  All 
created  minds  being  thus  prepared,  God  rises  and  casts  down 
Satan  and  all  his  host.  He  falls  upon  this  world  and  redoubles 
iiis  exertions  for  the  destruction  of  man,  and  for  the  thwarting 
of  the  Divine  purpose  and  plan  of  human  redemption.  The 
New  Testament  history  and  prophecy  reveal  the  conflict  and 
the  fatal  result. 

Such  is  a  synopsis  of  Mr.  Beecher's  scheme,  but  no  synopsis 
can  give  an  adequate  idea  of  the  amazing  web  of  Scripture, 
tradition,  and  analogy  in  which  it  is  woven  together,  nor  of  the 
purity  of  style,  the  lucidity  of  the  reasoning,  the  extensive  eru- 
dition, the  noble  candor,  and  elevated  piety  which  make  the 
book  not  only  a  study  for  the  theologian,  but  a  charm  for  the 
poet  and  the  scholar.  The  effect  of  the  whole  upon  one  who 
should  receive  it  (and,  strange  as  it  is,  there  are  those  who, 
relying  on  the  allegorical  mode  of  interpretation,  will  receive 
h)  is  to  dissipate  the  painful  mystery  of  man's  congenital  de- 
pravity, of  the  atonement  by  the  vicarious  sacrifice  of  Christ,  and 
ot  the  unceasing,  eternal  misery  of  the  incorrigible.  On  the 
winds  of  those  who  do  not  receive  it,  it  leaves  the  conviction 
that  some  great  mistake  has  been  made  by  theology,  orthodox 
R$  well  as  heterodox,  and  that  a  satisfactory  theodicy  is  yet  a 
thing  in  the  future  ;  a  desideratum  to  which  every  soul  that 
hjves  God  and  desires  the  well-being  of  mankind  should  ear- 
nestly aspire. 


274:  Theodicy.  [April, 

The  points  on  which  light  is  needed  are,  1.  The  origin  of 
sin.  2.  The  native  depravity  of  the  human  race.  3.  The 
atonement.  4.  The  eternal  doom  of  the  wicked.  These  points 
are  so  related  to  each  other  that  fundamental  error  on  one  will 
throw  a  shadow  over  all  the  rest.  If  you  exaggerate,  for  in- 
stance, the  doom  of  the  wicked,  making  it  unceasing  and  ever 
increasing  torment  in  actual  fire  or  its  equivalent,  then  no  vin- 
dication can  be  made' of  the  justice  of  the  Almighty  in  creating 
beings  capable  of  sinning  and  liable  to  sorrow  infinite  in  dura- 
tion and  immeasurable  in  intensity.  If  you  intensify  the  de- 
pravity of  the  heart,  and  make  it  dominant  over  the  will  from 
the  beginning,  then  you  cannot  justify  any  punishment,  how- 
ever light,  for  sin  is  thus  made  inevitable,  and  you  make  the 
atonement  a  farce.  Let  us,  therefore,  find  some  point  which, 
by  itself,  can  be  made  clear  in  the  light  of  reason  and  religion, 
and  then  admit  of  no  view  which  conflicts  with  this,  and  so 
proceed  to  the  end. 

1.  Let  us  take,  then,  the  point  which  is  naturally  first  in 
order,  namely,  the  origin  of  sin.  Mr.  Beecher  regards  it  as 
an  impenetrable  mystery  in  a  universe  originally  holy  and 
happy. 

If  such  was  the  original  condition  of  the  universe,  the  question 
arises,  How  sin  could  possibly  enter?  Some  minds  have  felt  the 
difficulty  so  strongly  upon  this  point  that  they  have  rejected  the 
Bible  account  of  the  matter,  and  denied  the  existence  of  any  sinless 
state  of  the  universe.  But  the  answer  to  the  question  is  simple. 
Sin  is  in  its  own  nature  anomalous,  and,  therefore,  mysterious  ;  it 
is  in  its  own  nature  an  unaccountable  thing.  For,  the"  moment  we 
admit  that  it  is  properly  accounted  for, — that  is,  the  moment 
we  assign  a  good  aud  sufficient  cause  for  it, — that  moment  it  ceases 
to  be  sin.  A  good  and  sufficient  cause  is  a  good  and  sufficient 
excuse,  and  that  which  has  a  good  and  sufficient  excuse  is  not  sin. 
To  account  for  sin,  therefore,  is  to  defend  it ;  and  to  defend  it,  is  to 
certify  that  it  is  not  sin. 

We  quote  this  passage,  not  as  a  specimen  of  Mr.  Beecher's 
logic,  but  as  expressing  his  opinion,  in  which  he  agrees  -with. 
so  many  able  writers.  A  recent  work  on  "  Eternal  Life  and 
Eternal  Death,"  by  Professor  Bartlett,  of  Chicago,  published 
by  the  American  Tract  Society,  considers  the  origin  of  sin  a 
mystery  as  great  as  its   eternal   continuance   and  perpetual 


jcf,9.]  Theodicy.  275 

punishment.  He  quotes,  also,  and  indorses  the  remarks  of 
Archbishop  Whately : 

The  existence  of  any  evil  at  all  in  the  creation  is  a  mystery  we 
cannot  explain.     It  is  a  difficulty  which  may  perhaps  be  cleared  up 

in  a  future  state,  but  the  Scriptures  give  us  no  revelation  concern- 
ing it.  And  those  Avho  set  at  defiance  the  plain  and  obvious  sense 
of°the  Scripture  by  contending,  as  some  do,  for  the  final  admission 
to  eternal  happiness  of  all  men,  in  order,  as  they  themselves  pro- 
fess, to  get  over  the  difficulty  by  this  means,  and  to  reconcile  the 
existence  of  evil  with  the  benevolence  of  God,  do  not  in  tact  after 
all,  when  they  have  put  the  most  forced  interpretation  on  the 
words  of  the  sacred  writers,  advance  one  single  step  toward  their 
point.  For  the  main  difficulty  is  not  the  amount  of  the  evil  which 
exists,  but  the  existence  of  any  at  all.  Any,  even  the  smallest 
portion  of  evil,  is  quite  unaccountable,  supposing  the  same  amount 
of  good  could  be  attained  without  that  evil.  And  why  it  is  not  so 
attainable  is  more  than  we  are  able  to  explain.  And  if  there  be 
some  reason  we  cannot  understand  why  a  small  amount  of  evil  is  un- 
avoidable ;  there  may  be,  for  aught  we  know,  the  same  reason  for  a 
greater  amount,  I  will  undertake  to  explain  to  any  one  the  final 
condemnation  of  the  wicked  if  he  will  explain  to  me  the  existence 
of  the  wicked  ;  if  he  will  explain  why  God  does  not  cause  all  those 
to  die  iu  the  cradle  of  whom  he  foresees  that  when  grown  up  they 
will  lead  a  sinful  life.     The  thing  cannot  be  explained. — Page  133. 

A  man  with  the  brightest  eyes  cannot  see  any  thing  to 
Avhich  his  attention  is  not  directed  ;  so,  without  disparaging 
the  ability  of  any  of  these  able  writers,  it  seems  to  us  that 
there  is  no  more  mystery  in  the  origin  of  sin,  if  you  will  look 
at  it  aside  from  its  supposed  future  consecpenees,  than  there  is 
in  the  existence  of  virtue.  God  could  have  made  a  material 
universe  full  of  beauty  and  sublimity,  and  he  could  have  cre- 
ated minds  capable  of  beholding  and  admiring  it,  without  pos- 
sessing any  ideas  of  right  and  wrong,  or  any  freedom  of  choice 
or  action  in  respect  to  it ;  but  in  such  a  creation  there  would 
have  been  wanting  all  moral  beauty  and  grandeur,  and  no  one 
would  reflect  his  Maker's  moral  image.  Xow  if  God  would 
have  a  moral  world,  and  emblazon  it  with  the  gems  of  various 
virtues,  he  must  make  creatures  with  the  capacity  of  distin- 
guishing right  and  wrong,  and  of  choosing  between  them. 
Xow  it  is  impossible  for  a  moral  agent  to  choose  the  right 
without  being  made  also  free  not  to  choose  it,  or  to  choose  the 
wrong.  It  is  true,  such  a  being  could  be  put  in  a  position 
where  his  happiness  would  be  so  clearly  and  constantly  on  the 


27G  Theodicy.  [April, 

side  of  right  that  he  would  feel  no  temptation  to  choose  the' 
opposite.  Such  a  place  is  heaven,  and  there  may  be  beings 
created  in  such  a  condition.  Why,  then,  did  not  God  place 
all  moral  creatures  in  such  a  condition,  and  keep  them  there  ? 
The  answer  is,  that  to  intensify  virtue,  as  well  as  to  produce 
certain  species  of  virtues  most  glorious  and  desirable,  moral 
agents  must  be  put  under  some  trial ;  that  is,  they  must  be  put 
where  appeals  may  be  made  to  their  natural  feelings  and  pas- 
sions which  it  would  be  difficult  to  resist.  Then,  if  they  suc- 
cessfully endure  the  ordeal,  as  in  the  case  of  Job,  their  right- 
eousness shines  out  with  resplendent  luster,  brighter  than  the 
sun,  and  rare  virtues  of  patience,  resignation,  courage,  hero- 
ism, trust,  appear  as  the  brightest  constellations  of  night.  To 
have  an  opportunity  of  yielding  such  fruitage  moral  beings 
must  be  free  to  choose  differently,  and  so  they  are  made  liable 
to  sin.  Xow,  if  those  who  fail  to  undergo  the  trial  success- 
fully, as  God  designed,  should  be  instantly  put  out  of  being, 
no  one  could  see  any  injustice  in  the  economy  of  God,  but  the 
greatest  goodness  in  giving  finite  creatures  an  opportunity  of 
excelling  in  holiness  and  deserving  eternal  life.  The  mystery, 
then,  is  not  in  sin  any  more  than  in  virtue,  but  in  its  supposed 
consequences  of  depravity  and  suffering.  But  these  do  not 
now  come  into  consideration.  When  we  come  to  them  we 
may  find  that  as  they  ought  to  be  in  harmony  with  the  true 
origin  of  sin,  so  they  may  be  regarded  in  the  clearest  light  of 
revelation  and  of  reason. 

If  this  plain  and  obvious  view  of  the  origin  of  sin  be  ac- 
cepted, it  furnishes  ground  for  the  overthrow  of  the  entire 
foundation  of  Mr.  Beecher's  theory  of  sin  by  the  revolt  of  Lu- 
cifer, for  he  makes  Lucifer  to  sin  in  heaven,  in  the  very  pres- 
ence of  God,  and  surrounded  by  the  glory  of  his  power ;  a  con- 
dition in  which,  however  free  his  moral  choice,  he  would  be 
under  no  liability  to  sin  whatever  ;  for  if  to  choose  wrong  in 
such  circumstances  might  not  be  pronounced  absolutely  im- 
possible, it  may  be  declared  impracticable.  We  know  that 
we  are  free  this  moment  to  rise  up  and  go  and  throw  ourselves 
off  some  precipice  or  into  the  lire,  but.  in  the  absence  of  any 
influential  motive  to  such  a  mad  procedure  we  are  safe  enough. 
A  condition  of  such  liability  of  sinning,  as  Mr.  Bcecher  sup- 
poses, is  not  practicable  in  heaven.     Were  his  theory  true, 


L889J  Theodicy.  277 

there  would  be  no  heaven  for  men  or  angels.  Heaven  is  a 
place  of  rest,  of  security,  of  freedom  from  fear  and  care  and 
peril.  If  Satan  tell  in  heaven,  as  Milton  imagined,  and  half 
the  religious  world  takes  thoughtlessly  from  him  and  the  theo- 
logians, and  as  Mr.  Beecher  thinks  is  proved  from  Scripture 
on  the  allegorical  mode  of  interpretation  and  otherwise,  then 
the  redeemed  will  be  liable  to  fall.  But  this  is  made  imprac- 
ticable, not  by  destroying  free  agency,  or  abolishing  the  law, 
but  by  their  being  separated  from  all  inducements  and  tempta- 
tion to  do  wrong.  Mere  freedom  under  the  law  does  not  argue 
danger  without  special  motives  to  a  wrong  choice,  for  then  no 
beings, however  exalted,  would  be  safe  a  moment.  Christ  him- 
self might  fall  at  the  head  of  his  Church,  and  God,  the  Judge 
of  all,  cease  to  do  right. 

It  is  time  the  tradition  of  Satan  falling  in  heaven  were  ex- 
ploded. Satan  never  was  and  never  will  be  in  heaven,  nor 
any  other  sinner,  nor  any  sin.  The  four  texts  which  are 
usually  made  to  support  the  popular  tradition  are  easily  dis- 
posed of:  "  How  art  thou  fallen  from  heaven,  O  Lucifer,  son  of 
the  morning,"  (Isa.  xiv,  12,)  is  a  typical  expression,  addressed 
in  the  style  of  the  East  to  Xebuchadnezzar,  the  king  of  Baby- 
lon, as  is  evident  from  the  whole  context ;  as,  for  example, 
(verse  16,)  "  Is  this  the  man  that  made  the  earth  to  tremble  ?" 
"  I  beheld  Satan  as  lightning  fall  from  heaven."  (Luke  x,  18.) 
Literally,  this  reads,  "  I  beheld  Satan,  as  lightning  from  heaven, 
fall."  It  means  simply,  Suddenly,  as  a  flash  of  lightning 
from  the  clouds  I  saw  the  power  of  the  devil  broken  by  the 
preaching  of  the  Gospel.  The  seventy  had  just  returned,  re- 
porting, "  Lord,  even  the  devils  are  subject  unto  us  through 
thy  name."  It  had  no  reference  whatever  to  the  past  before 
the  day  of  Christ,  but  to  what  was  then  going  ou,  and  to  the 
future.  "  And  there  was  war  in  heaven  :  Michael  and  his 
Mgels  fought  against  the  dragon  ;  and  the  dragon  fought  and 
his  angels,  and  prevailed  not ;  neither  was  their  place  found 
any  more  in  heaven."  Rev.  xii,  7,  8.  This,  like  every  thing 
else  in  Revelation,  has  reference  to  future  events.  It  is  a 
typical  prophecy  of  the  overthrow  of  the  moral  and  spiritual 
power  of  the  devil  in  the  ages  to  come  before  the  day  of  judg- 
ment. "And  the  angels  which  kept  not  their  first  estate,  but 
left  their  own  habitation,  he  hath  reserved  in  everlasting  chains 

Fourth  Skiues,  Vol.  XXI. — 18 


278  Theodicy.  [April, 

under  darkness  unto  the  judgment  of  the  great  day."  Jude  G. 
The  term  "  angel "  does  not  mean  a  celestial  spirit,  but  de- 
scribes usually  a  spiritual  being  who  is  not  of  this  world,  but 
may  be  in  hell  or  elsewhere  as  well  as  in  heaven.  Kor  does 
the  passage  otherwise  indicate  their  original  locality.  "  They 
left  their  own  habitation,"  it  says;  but  where  was  that  \  ]Sot 
heaven,  if  heaven  is  a  place  of  rest  and  happiness,  and  not  of 
trial  and  probation. 

Thus  all  the  foundations  of  Mr.  Beecher's  system  disappear 
as  frost-work  in  the  dawn  of  a  spring  morning. 

But  if  Satan  never  was  in  heaven,  where  did  he  have  his 
origin  and  fall  ?  Doubtless  in  some  paradisaical  state,  where 
he  was  placed  under  probation,  as  man  was  in  Eden.  The 
nearest  approach  to  an  explanation  of  it  is  the  passage  already 
quoted  from  St.  Jude's  Epistle.  From  this  we  learn  that  the 
test  of  his  obedience  was  to  abide  within  the  limits  of  his 
estate.  As  God  forbade  to  our  first  parents  the  fruit  of  the 
tree  in  the  midst  of  the  garden,  so  it  would  seem  that  he  said 
to  the  angels,  Pass  not  beyond  the  bounds  of  your  habitation. 
This,  then,  was  their  trial,  and  they  failed  under  it.  But  how 
could  beings,  made  pure  and  holy,  be  moved  to  transgress 
when  no  tempter  as  yet  existed?  Why,  just  as  good  men 
go  astray  now.  They  possessed  a  variety  of  natural  passions, 
all  tending  to  their  appropriate  objects,  among  which  was  the 
disposition  to  rove  ;  but  God  saw  lit  to  limit  its  exercise  for 
good  and  sufficient  reasons.  This  made  an  inevitable  antag- 
onism between  the  passions  and  the  conscience,  and  gave  occa- 
sion for  the  trial  of  their  obedience.  They  yielded  to  their 
passions,  and  were  condemned.  In  this  world  Adam  fell 
at  the  solicitation  of  Eve,  and  Eve  at  the  solicitation  of  Satan  ; 
but  the  only  difference  was  in  the  extra  excitement  of  their 
natural  passions  by  the  suggestions  of  the  tempter.  It  is 
clear  enough  that  without  a  tempter  the  very  interdiction 
of  what  was  naturally  attractive  to  the  passions  made  a  suffi- 
cient occasion  for  a  trial  more  or  less  severe,  and  such  as 
might  have  resulted  in  their  fall.  But  the  presence  and  fatal 
influence  of  the  tempter  was  made  the  occasion  for  making  a 
difference  in  God's  feelings  toward  them,  and  a  reason  for 
showing  them  mercy,  which  he  did  not  extend  to  Satan  and 
his  angels,  who  fell  without  solicitation.     Iu  this  light  we  see 


1869.3  Theodicy.  279 

no  more  mystery  in  original  sin,  either  that  of  man  or  angels, 
than  in  any  sin  now  committed ;  any  disobedience  to  the  law 
of  the  family,  of  the  school,  or  the  state.  That  sinners  are 
permitted  to  live  and  tempt  others  lias  no  more  difficulty  in 
it.  than  the  placing  of  moral  beings  in  a  state  of  trial.  If  the 
trial  is  intensified  it  gives  the  tempted  opportunity  of  devel- 
oping sublimer  virtues  and  securing  a  brighter  crown  of  right- 
eousness. Were  the  trial  greater  than  the  creature  could 
bear  it  would  be  no  probation,  but  a  subjugation;  for  as  man 
is  not  responsible  if  not  free,  so  he  is  not  free  if  the  pressure 
of  motive  is  too  great  to  resist.  In  such  a  condition  of  mind 
we  consider  a  person  insane,  and  pity  him.  It  is  not  a  con- 
dition in  which  either  virtue  or  vice  can  originate.  JSTo  axiom 
or  postulate  in  mathematics  is  clearer  than  that  responsibility 
and  ability  are  commensurate. 

DErRAVITY. 

These  remarks  explain  the  mystery  of  inherent  depravity. 
We  are  not  responsible  for  its  existence,  nor  for  its  instinctive 
operations,  but  only  for  our  voluntary  obedience  to  its  dic- 
tates. A  child  who  inherits  a  drunkard's  thirst  for  liquor  is 
not  to  be  blamed  for  it,  but  his  special  trial  is  to  watch  it  and 
resist  it.  Nevertheless,  it  is  a  depravity  and  an  evil ;  but  while 
he  resists  it  and  maintains  temperate  habits  he  acquires  extra- 
ordinary merit.  The  Eible  accounts  such  defects,  and  all  de- 
fects of  our  nature,  "sin,"  simply  in  the  sense  of  being  con- 
trary to  the  original  law  made  for  a  perfect  humanity  ;  but  it 
declares  to  all  who  will  believe  in  Christ  that  they  are  not 
♦under  the  law,  but  under  grace ;  that  is,  the  law,  while  it  is 
not  abolished  as  a  rule  of  life,  no  longer  stands  as  a  condi- 
tion of  acceptance  with  God  and  of  final  salvation.  What 
complaint,  then,  can  be  made  against  the  honor  and  justice  of 
God  in  permitting  our  human  race  to  be  propagated  from  a 
depraved  stock?  As  well  might  you  complain  of  a  proba- 
tionary state  of  any  kind  wherein  one  is  tempted  to  sin.  But 
W  it  a  "  disgrace  to  us "  to  be  born  so  depraved  ?  No  ;  no 
"lore  disgrace  than  to  be  born  of  intemperate  or  diseased  or 
feeble-minded  parents. 

"  Act  well  your  part, 
There  all  tho  honor  lies." 


280  Theodicy.  [April, 

And  all  the  greater  honor,  yea,  greater  than  horn  angels  may 
acquire  who  have  no  extreme  inducements  to  do  wrong. 

Our  author  does  not  explain  his  view  of  the  nature  of  our 
depravity ;  but  it  is  a  very  gloomy  view,  if  we  may  judge  by 
its  supposed  origin  in  a  celestial  state,  or  by  the  reference 
made  to  it  in  the  family  of  the  Beeehers,  us  related  in  the 
preface  as  already  quoted.  "  Every  breath  you  draw  is  sin," 
said  the  venerable  patriarch  to  his  nosv  famous  son  Henry. 
Is  there  any  sense,  we  would  inquire,  in  which  such  an  ex- 
pression can  be  considered  true  of  human  beings  in  this  life  ? 
Yes,  four  or  five. 

1.  In  the  sense  of  imperfection  attached  to  all  finite  moral 
agents.  "  Behold,"  said  Eliphaz  to  Job,  "  he  put  no  trust  in 
his  servants ;  and  his  angels  he  charged  with  folly."  Job  iv,  18. 
But  there  is  no  turpitude,  no  shame  to  be  ascribed  to  such 
imperfectness,  for  Eliphaz  adds  in  another  place,  (xv,  15,) 
"  Yea,  the  heavens  are  not  clean  in  his  sight ;"  and  Bildad 
responds  to  Job  in  a  similar  vein  :  "  How  then  can  man  be 
justified  with  God  ?  or  how  can  he  be  clean  that  is  born  of  a 
woman  ?  Behold  even  to  the  moon,  and  it  shineth  not ;  yea, 
the  stars  are  not  pure  in  his  sight.  How  much  less  man,  that 
is  a  worm  ?  and  the  son  of  man,  which  is  a  worm  ? "  Job  xxv, 
4-6.  And  he  who  was  "  born  of  a  woman,"  and  delighted  to 
call  himself  the  "Son  of  man,"  said  to  the  young  ruler,  doubt- 
less in  reference  to  his  human  nature,  which  was  yet  suscepti- 
ble of  further  knowledge  and  grace,  "  Why  callest  thou  me 
good?  there  is  none  good  but  one,  that  is,  God."  (Matt,  xix, 
17.)  But  how  absurd  to  apply  such  an  ambiguous  word  as 
"  sin "  to  such  a  want  of  absolute  and  infinite  perfection  ! 
And  yet  many  make  the  same  mistake  as  Job's  counselors 
did. 

2.  In  the  sense  in  which  we  fall  short  of  our  moral  ideals. 
The  most  gifted  and  perfect  minds  have  the  brightest  ideals, 
and  they  are  the  most  deeply  pained  by  their  failure  to  realize 
them.  As  they  advance  their  ideals  advance  too,  so  that  they 
are  destined  to  a  deeper  and  deeper  chagrin  blended  with  their 
more  exquisite  satisfactions.  This  is  true  of  artists  ;  it  is  true 
of  angels  doubtless.  There  is  but  one  Being  who  realizes  his 
own  ideal.  "  God  is  light,  and  in  him  there  is  no  darkness 
at  all."    1  John  i,  S.     How  preposterous,  then,  for  good  and 


ISO  9.3  Theodicy.  281 

holy  men  to  fret  themselves  because  they  have  not  yet  reached 
the  perfection  they  conceive  of  as  possible. 

3.  We  are  "  sinners,"  as  falling  short  of  the  law  originally 
given  for  a  perfect  humanity.  What  that  law  was  we  know 
not,  if  it  were  any  thing  different  from  the  ten  command- 
ments and  the  law  of  love  :  (though  many  good  men  talk  about 
it  as  if  they  knew  all  about  it,  and  blame  themselves  because 
they  are  not  as  perfect  as  Adam  was  before  the  fall ;)  but  our 
blame  is  to  be  measured  by  our  ability,  for  we  are  bound  only 
to  do  what  we  can  to  approach  the  original  pattern. 

4.  There  is  a  sense  in  which  we  may  be  justly  called  sin- 
ners—  when  we  find  ourselves  incapacitated  from  duty  by 
previous  neglects  or  abuses  of  our  nature.  But  if  we  are 
penitent  for  these  defects  our  guilt  is  forgiven,  and  our  im- 
perfection is  thenceforth  of  no  more  concern  to  us  than  if  it 
were  born  in  us,  or  than  the  defects  of  another  person. 
"  Though  your  sins  be  as  scarlet  they  shall  be  white  as  snow." 
If  now  "  we  walk  in  the  light,  as  He  is  in  the  light,  we  have 
fellowship  one  with  another,  and  the  blood  of  Jesus  Christ 
liis  Son  cleanseth  us  from  all  sin.  If  we  say  that  we  have  no 
Bin,  we  deceive  ourselves,  and  the  truth  is  not  in  us.  If  we 
confess  our  sins,  he  is  faithful  and  just  to  forgive  us  our  sins, 
and  to  cleanse  us  from  all  unrighteousness."  1  John  i,  7-9. 

5.  Finally,  if  we  continue  impenitent  and  unbelieving,  then, 
do  what  we  will,  we  sin  all  the  time.  A  boy  who  is  playing 
truant  and  forsaking  his  father's  house  is  doing  wrong  all  the 
time  in  every  thing,  even  if  he  be  enlisted  in  the  service  of  his 
country,  and  fighting  for  her  rights.  If  we  are  disloyal  to 
God  it  qualifies  our  whole  life,  and  makes  every  thing  disloyal 
which  we  do.  A  man  may  commit  robbery,  and  then  apply 
his  stolen  money  to  a  religious  or  charitable  purpose  ;  but  even 
this  disposition  of  it  is  wicked.  True,  it  would  be  greater 
wickedness  to  gamble  it  away,  and  thereby  involve  another's 
virtue ;  but  it  is  still  wicked  to  spend  one  cent  of  it  to  feed 
the  poor  or  to  build  a  synagogue.  In  this  sense  only  the  vir- 
tues of  unconverted  men  are  sins ;  but  there  is  no  reflection  on 
God  in  all  this,  and  no  mystery  to  stumble  us. 

So  much  for  this  question.  But  here  comes  the  diffi- 
culty. How  can  we  vindicate  the  government  of  God  for 
bringing  human  beings  into  the  world  with  such  a  moral  ca- 


282  Theodicy.  [April, 

pacity  and  under  such  temptation  as  actually  results  in  man- 
kind up  to  tin's  day  being  generally  impenitent  and  habitual 
sinners  ?  Mr.  Beecher's  theory  of  the  projection  of  beings  al- 
ready depraved  into  this  life  has  the  same  difficulty,  for  they 
do  not  seem  to  have  very  good  luck  so  far  in  the  new  proba- 
tion. Nor  is  there  in  either  case  so  much. to  perplex  us,  and 
to  seem  to  reflect  on  God,  seeing  these  men  are  free  in  their 
rebellion,  as  there  is  in  their  future  doom.  If  they  have  but 
a  poor  chance  for  virtue  and  acceptance  with  God,  that  chance 
is  a  gracious  gift,  provided  there  be  no  liability  to  too  severe 
punishment,  or  if  some  ulterior  arrangement  should  be  pro- 
vided to  bring  about  their  reformation  in  another  state  of  being. 
This  is  to  be  hereafter  considered.  In  a  general  view  we  may 
no  more  complain  of  the  world's  depravity  than  of  its  physical 
disorders,  and  so  we  understand  our  great  poet : 

"  If  plagues  or  earthquakes  break  not  Heaven's  design, 

Why  then  a  Borgia  or  a  Cataline? 

"Who  knows  but  lie,  whose  hand  the  lightning  forms, 

Who  heaves  old  ocean,  and  who  brings  the  storms, 

Pours  fierce  ambition  iu  a  Cesar's  mind, 

Or  turns  young  Amnion  loose  to  scourge  mankind?  .  .  . 

Better  for  us,  perhaps,  it  might  appear 

Were  there  all  harmony,  all  virtue  here ; 

That  never  air  or  ocean  felt  the  wind, 

That  never  passion  discomposed  the  mind: 

But  all  subsists  by  elemental  strife, 

And  passions  are  the  elements  of  life." 

Essay  on  Man. 

ATONEMENT. 

Leaving  the  subject  of  depravity,  which  has  been  abun- 
dantly discussed  in  previous  articles  of  this  Review,*  we 
pass  to  that  of  the  atonemeut.  The  author's  theory  has  al- 
ready been  mentioned.  It  is  distinguished  from  and  defended 
against  three  different  theories  which  have  largely  obtained, 
and  for  a  long  time,  in  the  Christian  world  :  the  Patristic 
theory,  the  Scholastic,  and  the  Modern.  The  latter  he  styles 
the  New  England  theory,  but  it  is  substantially  that  of  several 
non-Calvinistic  and  transatlantic  writers.  •  On  this  subject  Mr. 
Beec.her  lays  out  his  greatest  strength,  and  though  we  may  not 
adopt  his  theory,  we  concede  his  unrivaled  ability  in  maintain- 
*  See  Harmony  of  Moral  Philosophy  and  Theology,  Mdh.  Quart,  1855. 


1869.1  Theodicy.  283 

ing  it,  and  acknowledge  his  great  candor  in  debate.  "We  must 
add,  also,  that  if  the  piety  which  he  every-where  manifests 
were  the  exclusive  offspring  of  his  theory  of  redemption  it 
would  go  very  far  to  prove  its  divine  origin,  and  would  cer- 
tainly prove  that  no  particular  theory  of  atonement  is  essen- 
tial to  salvation. 

The  substance  of  the  ancient  theory  is,  that  the  human  race 
by  original  sin  had  made  themselves  the  servants  of  Satan, 
and  being  doomed  to  die  in  consequence,  they  were  taken 
after  death  into  Hades,  a  subterranean  region,  and  made  his 
captives  and  slaves.  To  redeem  mankind  from  this  deplora- 
ble condition  God  offered  to  Satan  a  ransom  in  the  person 
of  his  Son  Jesus  Christ.  This  offer  was  accepted,  and  Jesus 
came  into  the  world,  and  was  subjected  to  Satan's  temptations, 
and  finally  put  to  death.  He  then  descended  into  Hades  and 
claimed  the  ransomed  captives,  and  suddenly  displaying  his 
divine  attributes,  before  artfully  concealed  from  Satan,  he 
overwhelmed  the  opposition  which  Satan  began  to  make  to 
the  fulfillment  of  the  contract,  and  rescued  the  captives,  and 
ascended  with  them  to  paradise. 

This  theory  he  traces  as  far  back  as  Clement  of  Eome,  in 
the  first  century.  "  The  sole  cause  of  the  Lord's  descent  into 
Hades,"  says  Clement,  "  was  to  preach  the  Gospel."  Irenaeus 
in  the  6econd  century  writes  :  u  The  law  burdened  sinful  man 
by  showing  him  to  be  the  debtor  of  death,  and  in  order  to  his 
release  Satan  must  be  justly  conquered.  .  .  .  His  suffering  was 
the  means  of  awakening  his  sleeping  disciples,  on  whose  account 
lie  descended  into  the  lower  part  of  the  earth."  Tertullian, 
Justin  Martyr,  and  Origen  arc  quoted  for  similar  testimony. 
Modern  authors  are  quoted,  attesting  this  to  be  the  doc- 
trine of  the  early  Church,  as  Huidekoper,  Neander,  Knapp, 
Hagenbach,  Bauer,  and  Schaif.  The  latter  remarks :  ;'  The 
negative  part  of  the  doctrine,  the  subjection  of  the  devil,  the 
prince  of  the  kingdom  of  sin  and  death,  was  naturally  most 
dwelt  upon  in  the  Patristic  period.  This  theory  continued 
Current  until  the  satisfaction  theory  of  Anselm  gave  a  new 
turn  to  the  development  of  the  dogma." 

After  commenting  justly  and  apologetically  upon  the  ele- 
ment of  deception  as  to  Christ's  divine  nature,  which  the  early 
Christian  ages  admitted   into  their  theory,  Mr.  Beecher  re- 


2S4  Theodicy.  [April, 

marks,  (t  There  was  something  fascinating  to  the  imagination 

in  it  that  completely  dominated  over  that  rude  and  iron  age. 
It  awoke  all  their  love  of  the  marvelous,  all  their  sense  of  the 
sublime,  all  their  pity,  horror,  and  shuddering  sympathy. 
That  Jesus,  a  helpless  man,  alone  dared  to  meet  the  wrath  of 
demons  dire,  treading  that  downward  path  from  which  the 
angels  shrank ;  that  in  the  heart  of  the  infernal  dungeon  he 
met  the  enemy,  and  engaged  in  personal  conflict  with  him  and 
all  his  legions ;  that  he  defeated  them,  and  with  infinite 
strength  broke  the  adamantine  gates,  and  crushed  the  eternal 
barriers  ;  these  ideas  thrilled  their  whole  being  through  and 
through,  and  woke  toward  Jesus  their  highest  adoration  and 
love." 

Mr.  Beecher  thinks  that  this  theory  had  an  element  of  truth 
in  it  in  the  respect  it  had  to  Satan,  so  far  as  authorized  by 
such  passages  as  these :  "  And  I  will  put  enmity  between  thee 
and  the  woman,  and  between  thy  seed  and  her  seed;  it  shall 
bruise  thy  head,  and  thou  shalt  braise  his  heel."  Gen.  iii,  15. 
"  That  through  death  he  might  destroy  him  that  had  the 
power  of  death,  that  is,  the  devil."  Heb.  ii,  14.  "  He  that 
committeth  sin  is  of  the  devil ;  for  the  devil  sinneth  from  the 
beginning.  For  this  purpose  the  Son  of  God  was  manifested, 
that  he  might  destroy  the  works  of  the  devil."  1  John  iii,  8. 
He  concludes  that  no  theory  of  the  atonement  can  be  accepted 
which  ignores  these  passages. 

SCHOLASTIC   THEOEY. 
He  now  comes  to  the  Scholastic  theory,  which  was  elabora- 
ted by  Ansel m,  Archbishop  of  Canterbury,  near  the  close  of 
the  eleventh  century,  and  very  rapidly  supplanted  that  which 
had  obtained  for  over  a  thousand  years. 

This  theory  may  be  reduced  to  the  two  main  propositions.  .  .  . 

1.  Sin  is  so  intrinsically  deserving  of  punishment  that  the  non- 
execution  of  penalty  in  a  single  instance  would  be  a  crime  in  di- 
vine administration. 

2.  God  does  in  fact  execute  the  penalty  of  the  law  upon  the  sin- 
ner's substitute. 

To  show  that  these  propositions  are  maintained  by  theolo- 
gians he  quotes  in  support  of  the  first  from  Turretin,  Dr. 
Ilodge  of  Princeton,  Professor  Shcdd  of  Andover,  Bradbury, 


1S60.1  Theodicy.  285 

Bellamy,  and  the  celebrated  Baptist  preacher,  Mr.  Spnrgeon ; 
and  in  behalf  of  the  second  proposition  he  cites  from  Calvin, 
Luther,  Bourdalone,  Barrow,  the  Westminster  Assembly,  Presi- 
dent Edwards,  the  late  Dr.  Spencer  of  Brooklyn,  Dr.  Spring 
of  New  York,  Spnrgeon,  Dr.  Hodge,  aud  Professor  Shedd. 
All  these  in  various  forms  of  speech,  florid  and  plain,  simple 
and  elaborate,  calm  and  enthusiastic,  clear  as  a  mathematical 
statement,  and  glowing  with  eloquence  like  a  prophet's  word, 
all  declare  with  one  voice  that  divine  justice  can  only  be  satis- 
fled  b;v  a  plenary  execution  of  the  penalty  of  the  law  upon  the 
sinner  or  upon  his  substitute. 

Either,  then,  the  sinner,  however  penitent,  must  bear  his  penalty, 
or  some  one  must  bear  it  for  him.  To  this  end  Infinite  Wisdom 
discovers  a  way.  He  gives  his  own  Son.  Christ  consents.  Upon 
liim,  as  the  sinner's  surety,  God  executes  full  punishment — a  pun- 
ishment sometimes  identical  with,  sometimes  only  equivalent  to, 
that  due  to  the  transgressor.  At  the  same  time,  Christ's  perfect 
ohedience  is  imputed  to  the  believer,  he  is  freed  from  penalty,  and 
endowed  with  full  title  to  heavenly  felicity. 

"This  theory,"  he  adds,  "is  by  no  means  obsolete." 

In  New  England,  indeed,  it  is  seldom  heard.  A  few  ministers 
still  cling  to  it ;  but  though  obsolete  in  New  England,  it  is  domi- 
nant throughout  evangelical  Christendom,  except  where  the  new 
divinity  has  penetrated.  All  the  creeds  and  formulas  of  the  Ref- 
ormation have  it — all  the  Protestant  Churches  of  the  old  world. 
And  it  yet  stands  uncondemned  in  the  creeds  of  the  Presby- 
terian and  Congregational  Churches,  both  Old  School  and  New. 
The  difference  is,  in  the  Old  School  it  is  believed  and  taught,  and 
in  the  new  it  is  supplanted  by  a  new  theory,  hereafter  to  be  con- 
sidered. 

The  first  prominent  opponent  of  this  theory  was  Socinus,  in 
the  sixteenth  century.  lie  contended  that  the  satisfaction  of 
justice  by  proxy  is  impossible  in  the  nature  of  things,  and  if  it 
were  practicable  there  would  be  no  grace  in  forgiveness.  Says 
Mr.  Beecher : 

Grotius,  of  the  seventeenth  century,  attempting  to  defend  the 
doctrine,  in  reality  gave  up  its  fundamental  principle,  and  in  a 
measure  anticipated  the  New  England  theory,  though  he  did  not 
fully  elaborate  and  defend  it.  His  defense,  therefore,  availed 
nothing,  and  produced  little  effect.  Men  continued  either  to  hold 
the  Scholastic  doctrine  or  become  Socinians.  It  was  not  till  after 
President  Edwards's  day  that  the  new  theory,  of  which  the  germs 
were  found  in  Grotius,  was  fully  elaborated  and  enabled  to  take 


286  Theodicy.  [April, 

the  place  of  tbe  old,  so  that  a  man  might  reject  it  without  falling 
into  Socinianism. 

In  addition  to  the  objections  of  Socinns,  the  Kew  England 
divines  have  asserted  that  the  satisfaction  theory  leads  either 
to  a  limited  atonement  or  to  Univerealism,  and  Mr.  Beecher 
urges  still  other  objections. 

Here  opens  an  exciting  view  of  the  controversy  which  for 
three  quarters  of  a  century  has  been  going  on  between  the  ad- 
vocates and  opponents  of  the  old  theory,  the  Old  School  and 
the  Xew  School.  The  younger  Edwards,  Emmons,  Smalley, 
Griffin,  Fiske,  Cox,  Bern  an,  Burge,  Albert  Barnes,  Professor 
Park  are  seen  arrayed  on  the  side  of  the  new  theory,  bached 
up  in  their  opposition  to  the  old  doctrine,  though  not  in  sup- 
port of  the  substitute  by  distinguished  Unitarian  and  Univer- 
salist  writers. 

"  How  plain  it  is,"  says  Dr.  Channing,  "  that,  according  to 
this  doctrine,  God  never  forgives,  for  it  seeras  absurd  to  speak  of 
men  as  forgiven,  when  their  whole  punishment,  or  an  equiva- 
lent to  it,  is  borne  by  a  substitute." 

THE  NEW  ENGLAND  THEORY. 

This  is  founded  on  such  texts  as  Romans  iii,  23-26 : 
"  For  all  have  sinned,  and  come  short  of  the  glory  of  God  ; 
being  justified  freely  by  his  grace  through  the  redemption 
that  is  in  Christ  Jesus :  whom  God  hath  set  forth  to  be  a  pro- 
pitiation through  faith  in  his  blood,  to  declare  his  righteous- 
ness for  the  remission  of  sins  that  are  past,  through  the  for- 
bearance of  God  ;  to  declare,  I  say,  at  this  time  his  righteous- 
ness :  that  ho  might  be  just,  and  the  justifier  of  him  which 
belie veth  in  Jesus." 

The  atonement  is  not  to  appease  the  vengeance  of  the  Fa 
ther,  or  to  satisfy  his  justice  and  procure  his  favor  for  sinners 
by  the  substitution  of  Christ  to  endure  the  penalty  of  the  law, 
or  an  equivalent  to  it,  in  the  stead  of  sinners,  but  to  give  scope 
for  the  safe  exercise  of  mercy  and  pardon  by  displaying  God's 
regard  for  justice  and  righteousness  in  the  Bufferings  of  his 
Son,  whereby,  while  the  penalty  of  law  is  remitted  to  the 
penitent,  it  is  done  so  as  not  to  disparage  the  justice  of  the 
law  or  detract  from  its  authority. 

"  The  cross  was  set  up,"  says  our  author,  interpreting  this 


1869.]  Theodicy.  287 

theory,  "  to  convince  the  intelligent  universe  of  the  spotless 
righteousness  of  God  in  the  final  issues  of  punishment  and  of 
pardon.  Hence,  contrasting  the  two — the  Scholastic  and  the 
New  England  views — we  may  say  concisely,  Tn  the  one  the 
cross  was  a  punishment,  in  the  other  it  is  an  argument."  But 
lie  prefers  to  employ  in  exposition  of  the  new  theory  the  very 
words  of  its  leading  advocates.  "  That  is  done,"  says  the 
younger  Edwards,  "by  the  death  of  Christ,  which  supports 
the  authority  of  the  law,  and  renders  it  consistent  with  the 
glory  of  Clod  and  the  good  of  the  whole  system  to  pardon  the 
sinner."  "That  the  forgiveness  of  sinners  may  not  bring," 
6ays  Smalley,  "  the  eternal  law  of  righteousness  into  disregard 
and  contempt,  .  .  .  The  letter  of  law  may  be  deviated  from, 
and  yet  the  spirit  of  it  be  supported  and  the  design  of  it  fully 
obtained."  He  then  illustrates  by  the  familiar  example  o{ 
Zeleucus,  king  of  the  Locrians,  who  gave  up  one  of  his  own 
eyes  to  save  his  guilty  son  from  the  penalty  of  total  blindness 
by  the  loss  of  both  eyes.  "  Thus,"  says  Dr.  Emmons,  "  God 
made  it  manifest  that  he  feels  the  same  hatred  of  sin  and  dis- 
position to  punish  it  when  he  forgives  as  when  he  punishes 
sinners."  "  The  atonement,"  says  Dr.  Griffin,  "  was  plainly  an 
expedient  of  a  moral  government  to  support  the  moral  law,  .  .  . 
an  operation  upon  public  law  for  the  benefit  of  the  universe. 
Nothing  could  have  the  least  influence  to  satisfy  him  but  that 
operation  upon  public  law."  Mr.  Barnes  remarks  that  "  the 
Bufferings  endured  by  the  Redeemer  in  the  place  of  the  sinner 
are  fitted  to  make  a  deeper  impression  in  the  universe  at  large 
than  would  be  produced  by  the  punishment  of  the  sinner 
himself." 

This  theory  is  shown  by  our  author  to  be  very  different  from 
the  Socinian  theory,  though  agreeing  with  it  in  the  assumption 
that  forgiveness  of  sins  is  the  absolute  prerogative  of  God. 
"  When  the  Socinian  says  that  forgiveness  is  right,  and  needs  not 
to  be  made  right,  New  England  divines  are  not  afraid  to  agree 
with  him.  Truth  must  be  acknowledged  by  whomsoever 
ppoken.  Bntwhen  the  Socinian  says  that  forgiveness  was  also 
safe  and  consistent,  so  that  no  incarnation  and  death  of  the 
Eternal  Word  was  necessary,  then  we  draw  the  line  and  stand 
^  irreconcilable  opposition." 

The  objections  to  the  New  England  theory  are  very  fairly 


288  Theodicy.  [April, 

stated  by  our  author,  and  refuted  also,  so  far  as  they  are  un- 
sound ;  but  he  urges  his  own  objections  to  the  theory  as  a  whole, 
not  to  that  part  which  makes  the  object  of  the  death  of  Christ 
to  display  God's  righteousness,  which  he  indorses,  but  to  that 
part  which  makes  the  death  of  Christ  to  be  an  infliction  of 
pain  and  death  instead  of  the  sinner's  endurance  of  the  whole 
penalty  of  the  law.  The  ordinary  objections  fire,  1,  that  this 
theory  denies  that  sin  deserves  punishment  for  its  own  sake,  as 
well  as  for  the  prevention  of  crime.  2.  Some  say  that  the 
will  of  God  makes  right,  and  therefore  to  will  the  free  forgive- 
ness of  sins  displays  his  righteousness  as  much  as  the  gift  of 
his  Son  to  die  for  sinners.  3.  Some  say  that  they  do  not  see 
how  the  death  of  Christ  exhibits  the  justice  of  God,  or  the 
sanctity  and  authority  of  the  law,  if  the  death  of  a  proxy  be 
not  a  requisition  of  justice,  nor  an  exact  equivalent  to  the  pen- 
alty of  the  law. 

"  This  objection  was  urged  by  Dr.  Hodge  in  a  review  of  a  lit- 
tle treatise  on  the  Atonement  by  Dr.  Beman  twenty  or  twenty- 
five  years  ago  ;  but  in  vain  have  I  searched  the  writings  of 
the  other  side  for  a  reply.  Hence  it  behooves  us  to  weigh  the 
matter  well.  As  candid  men  we  must  allow  to  every  argument 
all  its  real  weight.  Let  us  then  ask,  Does  the  infliction  of  suf- 
ferings on  Christ,  which  is  yet  not  punishment  nor  the  penalty 
of  the  law,  show  God's  determination  to  punish  ?  Does  it  show 
respect  for  the  law,  or  does  it,  as  Dr.  Baird  afhrms,  "  consti- 
tute a  signal  proclamation  of  the  dethroning  of  the  law,  and 
the  prostration  of  its  honor  in  the  dust?" 

The  answer  is,  The  divine  Being  submitting  to  any  suffering 
out  of  respect  to  his  law,  must  honor  it  infinitely.  But  then, 
he  says,  why  do  you  assert,  some  of  you,  that  God  cannot  suf- 
fer, but  is  absolutely  impassible.  But  as  Mr.  Beecher,  in  a 
chapter  full  of  eloquence  and  pathos,  admits  that  God  can  suf- 
fer, he  here  adds:  "Would  it  show  respect  for  law  unless  that 
very  evil  were  necessary  by  the  law  ? ''  Yes,  in  the  same  way 
in  which  Zeleucus,  giving  up  one  of  his  eyes,  which  the  law 
did  not  require,  gave  great  honor  to  the  law.  But  Zeleucus, 
he  thinks,  did  not  honor  his  law,  he  degraded  it,  and  for  per- 
sonal and  selii^h  considerations.  What  a  contrast  was  his  fa- 
therly weakness  to  the  noble  justice  of  Louis  XVth,  who  re- 
fused on  any  terms  to  pardon  his  son  for  the  crime  of  murder  in 


1600.]  Ttteodicy.  289 

the  streets  of  Paris.  "  I  will  not  spare  my  son  for  a  crime 
lor  which  I  would  condemn  my  meanest  subject." 

In  this  style  Mr.  Beecher  disposes  of  the  New  England  the- 
ory. Betainiug  that  part  of  it  which  makes  the  death  of 
Christ  a  display  of  God's  righteousness,  he  combines  it  with  an 
element  of  the  Patristic  theory  respecting  the  overthrow  of 
Satan,  and  lays  it  at  the  foundation  of  his  own  theory.  Christ 
lives  and  dies  to  resist  and  to  expose  the  malice  of  Satan,  and 
to  make  manifest  the  justice  of  God  in  casting  him  down  from 
his  heavenly  throne  and  delivering  those  whom  he  had  seduced 
and  devoted  to  destruction. 

Keviewing  this  discussion,  it  seems  to  us  that  although  Mr. 
Beecher  has  aimed  to  do  justice  to  all  parties  in  controversy 
in  stating  their  opinions  and  making  quotations  from  their 
writings,  he  will  scarcely  obtain  their  approbation  of  his  di- 
gest of  their  principles  and  arguments.  It  is  certain  that  we 
could  not  indorse  either  the  Scholastic  or  the  Nova-Anglian 
theory  as  he  has  presented  them.  The  latter,  however,  is 
nearest  the  true  definition  of  atonement,  but  it  is  not  a  com- 
plete view  without  taking  something  from  the  other  side.  We 
should  prefer  the  following  view  of  the  atonement : 

That  it  is  the  satisfaction  made  by  the  death  of  Christ  to  di- 
vine justice,  whereby  the  divine  Lawgiver  is  disposed  to  forgive 
sinners  on  suitable  application  to  him  on  their  part ;  because  this 
transaction  so  manifests  his  righteousness,  and  the  sacredness 
and  importance  of  his  law,  that  it  is,  in  effect,  a  full  equivalent 
in  the  preservation  of  moral  order  to  the  execution  of  the  pen- 
alty of  the  law  upon  the  guilty. 

This  definition  shows  in  what  sense  the  vicarious  death  of 
Christ  is  a  satisfaction  to  the  justice  of  God  :  it  is  not  a  legal 
or  a  commercial  satisfaction,  but  a  judicial  satisfaction  ;  not  the 
endurance  of  the  same  penalty  as  sinners  deserved,  or  an  equal 
penalty,  but  what  in  him  as  their  mediator  is  fitted  to  have  as 
good  influence  in  the  divine  administration.  It  is  grace  which 
accepts  this  instead  of  the  punishment  of  the  sinner  or  legal  sat- 
isfaction. The  objections  which  have  been  urged  by  the  parties 
in  the  discussion  against  each  other's  theory  do  not  lie  against 
thi^,  and  it  harmonizes  with  all  the  texts  which  have  been 
quoted  on  either  side.  As  to  those  passages  respecting  the 
devil  which  Mr.  Beecher  and  the  medieval  theologians  make 


290  Theodicy.  [April, 

so  much  of,  they  are  important  as  showing  the  occasion  of  the 
exercise  of  divine  mercy  toward  man  instead  of  toward  fallen 
angels ;  for  man  was  seduced  from  his  allegiance  to  God  by 
the  malicious  arts  of  Satan,  who  is  still  seeking  their  destruc- 
tion, whereas  the  angels  fell  without  a  tempter  and  of  their 
own  accord ;  and  this  also  gives  the  Divine  reason  for  under- 
taking the  redemption  of  mankind  in  the  only  May  possible, 
by  the  subjection  of  his  only-begotten  Son  to  death  in  their 
stead  ;  thus  counteracting  the  vile  malignity  of  the  apostate 
angel  toward  beings  who  had  not  injured  him,  by  the  self-sacri- 
ficing compassion  of  God's  adorable  Son. 

PUNISHMENT. 

It  remains  to  consider  the  nature  of  the  penalty  which  is 
attached  to  sin  in  the  law.  Theologians  seem  not  to  be  con- 
scious that  it  is  here  the  real  difficulty  lies  in  the  vindication  of 
the  Divine  government.  We  can  reconcile  with  our  ideas  of  the 
justice  and  goodness  of  God  the  origin  of  sin,  the  depravity  of  our 
fallen  race,  and  the  atonement,  on  the  supposition  that  account- 
able beings  are  not,  in  the  trial  of  their  virtue,  put  to  the  risk 
of  too  great  consequences  in  case  of  failure.  The  plea  that 
they  are  free,  and  if  they  know  their  doom,  whatever  it  may 
be,  they  are  to  blame  for  incurring  it,  is  not  satisfactory.  They 
should  not  be  allowed  to  take  such  responsibility.  Besides, 
the  guilty  are  not  the  only  ones  affected  by  their  doom  ;  their 
friends,  the  angels  of  God,  all  sympathetic  creatures,  and  God 
himself,  are  concerned  in  their  sufferings.  Tet  on  this  super- 
ficial plea  theologians  have,  to  alarm  the  wicked,  piled  up  hor- 
ror upon  horror,  lasting  unrespited  through  eternal  ages,  not 
considering  in  what  an  odious  light  it  places  the  character  of 
the  Creator,  nor  whether  such  exaggerations  are  not  likely  to 
stagger  all  faith  in  revelation.  Indeed,  most  of  the  infidelity 
of  Christendom  can  be  traced  to  the  revulsion  which  kind  and 
considerate  minds  have  experienced  on  this  subject.  It  is  time 
for  the  Christian  world  to  wake  up  to  the  effect  of  such  dog- 
mas if  they  would  not  have  evangelical  religion  completely 
wrecked  upon  these  sand-bars.  It  is  not  our  purpose  to  de- 
fine the  scriptural  doctrine  of  future  punishment;  perhaps  in 
its  nature,  if  not  in  its  duration,  it  is  left  in  obscurity  and  mys- 
tery.    Our  point  is,  that  it  behooves  us  not  to  accept  any  doc- 


1809.]  Theodicy.  291 

trine  which  reflects  upon  the  Divine  justice  and  goodness.  This 
i>  indeed  the  very  first  principle  of  correct  interpretation.  The 
following  schemes  for  eternal  punishment  are  now  pressed  upon 
our  attention: 

1.  Mr.  Beecher's  view  of  the  doom  of  sinners  is,  that  it  de- 
pends for  its  continuance  upon- the  continued  impenitence  of 
the  condemned.  At  any  moment  when  they  will  submit  to 
God  and  ask  for  mercy  they  will  receive  it;  but  then  he  be- 
lieves that  they  never  will  submit.  This  is  the  view  taken  by 
the  author  of  Ecce  Deus,  (and  by  Bledsoe  in  his  Theodicy,) 
who  displays  equal  ability  with  our  author  in  treating-  of 
this  perplexing  topic,  subject,  however,  to  one  drawback  in 
respect  to  his  absurd  and  almost  blasphemous  remarks  upon 
the  impossibility  of  the  Almighty's  annihilating  moral 
beings. 

2.  There  is  the  doctrine  of  Dr.  Bushnell,  that  sinners 
receive  a  certain  measure  of  sorrow  at  their  doom ;  but  their 
being  may  grow  less  and  less  without,  ever  reaching  a  com- 
plete extinction,  as  the  asymptote  of  a  circle  is  a  line  so 
projected  as  to  be  always  approaching  the  circle  without  ever 
touching  it. 

3.  The  doctrine  that,  the  penalty-state  is  exile  from  heaven 
forever,  in  a  depraved  character  and  under  eternal  despair  of 
any  improvement,  but  not  increasiiig  in  sin  or  in  misery  by  any 
proclivity  derived  from  a  state  of  probation,  but  subject  to  such 
alternations  as  may  arise  from  keeping  or  breaking  the  rules  of 
prison  discipline. 

4.  The  opinion  that  by  the  law  of  habit  sinners  will  grow 
more  and  more  wicked,  and  consequently  more  and  more  mis- 
erable forever. 

5.  The  doctrine  that  in  addition  to  the  pangs  of  a  guilty 
conscience  and  disappointment  of  heaven  the  wicked  will  be 
positively  and  ceaselessly  tormented  by  burning  unconsumed 
in  actual  fire,  or  its  equivalent  in  the  power  to  torture. 

G.  The  doctrine  that  fire  is  but  the  symbol  of  swift  and  pain- 
ful destruction,  and  that  the  eternal  doom  of  the  wicked  is  literal 
death  at  the  day  of  judgment ;  that  is,  the  extinction  of  con- 
sciousness and  all  capacity  of  thinking,  or  feeling,  or  acting. 
This  ends,  of  course,  the  terrible  scene  of  sin  and  Buffering  by 
the  destruction  of  the  subject. 


292 


Theodicy. 


LApri 


7.  The  human  sonl  is  material  or  inseparable  from  the  body 
— and  perishes  with,  the  body  at  death ;  a  destiny  which  will 
be  reversed  only  in  the  case  of  the  righteous  by  resurrection 
at  the  final  coming  of  Christ. 

8.  The  resurrection  of  the  wicked  at  the  last  day  to  receive 
a  public  judgment  and  the  doom  of  utter  annihilation. 

9.  Transformation,  or  moral  death,  by  the  elimination  of  the 
moral  attributes  of  wicked  men  and  the  oblivion  of  memory  ; 
the  abuse  of  man's  moral  capacity  ending  in  its  destruction, 
and  degrading  him,  like  Nebuchadnezzar,  to  the  level  of  the 
beasts  of  the  field. 

All  these  theories  agree  as  to  the  eternal  loss  of  heaven  as 
being  the  main  element  in  the  doom  of  the  lost.  To  the  in- 
quiring mind,  reconsidering  the  question  de  novo,  the  problem 
would  be  to  determine  which  theory  is  most  agreeable  to  the 
Scriptures  and  to  rational  considerations,  and  especially  the 
justice  and  wisdom  of  God  and  the  moral  order  and  peace  of 
the  universe.  With  some  of  them  a  rational  vindication  of  the 
divine  government  is  easy  ;  but  with  others  no  theodicy  is 
possible,  whatever  views  may  be  taken  of  the  origin  of  sin,  of 
depravity,  and  probation.* 


Art.  VII.— FOREIGN"  RELIGIOUS  INTELLIGENCE. 


GREAT  BRITAIN. 

Progress  of  the  Ritualistic  Contro- 
versy— Second  Report  of  the  Ritual- 
istic Commission* — Important  Decision 
of  the  English  Courts  condemning 
several  Ritualistic  Practices— The 
Ritualists  in  Council  —  Prominent 
Ritualists  in  favor  of  Separation  be- 
tween Church  and  State. — During  the 
last  months  of  the  year  1868,and  in  the  first 
of  the  year  lSK3,"the  Ritualistic  contro- 
versy has  assumed  in  England  greater 
dimensions  than  it  has  had  at  any  former 
period  of  the  history  of  the  AiiLrlie;in 
Church.  The  Royal  Commission  on  Rit- 
ualism which  was  appointed  in  18G7,  mid 


counts  among  its  members  many  of  the 
most  prominent  members  of  the  Church, 
issued  its  second  report  to  the  Queen. 
Tiie  committee  have  no  intention  to  settle 
any  principle,  but  to  regulate  some  de- 
tails in  accordance  with  established  law. 
The  Report,  in  particular,  refers  to  the 
use  of  candles  and  incense.  In  their 
opinion  no  sufficient  evidence  has  been 
adduced  to  prove  that  at  any  time  dur- 
ing the  last  three  centuries  have  lighted 
caudles  been  used  in  parish  churches  as 
accessories  to  the  celebration  of  the  Holy 
Communion  until  within  the  last  twenty- 
five  years.  The  use  of  incense,  too,  in 
the  public  services  of  th  Hmrch  during 
the  present  century  is  v  -;y  recent,  and 


*  Our  respected  correspondent  is  of  course  competent  to  be  solely  responsible 
for  his  individual  opiuious. —  Ed. 


1809.1 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


293 


ll  .•  instances  of  its  introduction  very 
Tire;  and,  so  far  as  the  Commissioners 
bare  any  evidence  before  them,  it  is  at 
rariauce  with  the  Church's  usage  for 
three  hundred  years.  They  arc.  there- 
fore, of  opinion  that  it  is  inexpedient  to 
:  -'.rain  in  the  public  services  of  the 
Church  all  variations  from  established 
usage  in  respect  to  lighted  candles  and 
incense. 

The  remedy  which  the  Commissioners 
inggest  should  be  provided  for  parishion- 
ers aggrieved  by  the  introduction  of  in- 
cense  and  candles  is  as  follows ; 

First,  that  whensoever  it  shall  be  found 
necessary  that  order  be  taken  concerning 
the  same,  the  ueage  of  the  Church  of 
Kngland  and  Ireland,  as  above  stated  to 
have  prevailed  for  the  last  three  hundred 
years,  shall  be  deemed  to  be  the  rule  of 
"the  Church  in  respect  of  vestments, 
lights,  and  incense;  and,  secondly,  that 
parishioners  may  make  formal  applica- 
tion to  the  Bishop  in  camera,  and  the 
Bishop,  on  snch  application,  shall  be 
hound  to  inquire  into  the  matter  of  the 
complaint;  and  if  it  shall  thereby  appear 
tlict  there  has  been  a  variation  from 
established  usage,  by  the  introduction  of 
vestments,  lights,  or  incense  in  the  pub- 
lic services  of  the  Church,  he  shall  take 
order  forthwith  for  the  discontinuance 
Of  such  variation,  and  be  enabled  to  en- 
force the  same  summarily. 

The  Commissioners  also  think  that  the 
determination  of  the  Bishop  on  such  ap- 
plication should  be  subject  to  appeal  to 
the  Archbishop  of  the  province  in  camera, 
whose  decision  thereon  shall  be  final; 
provided  always,  that  if  it  should  appear 
10  either  party  that  tho  decision  of  the 
Bishop  or  Archbishop  is  open  to  question 
on  any  legal  ground,  a  case  may  be  stated 
by  the  party  dissatisfied,  to  be  certified 
by  the  Bishop  or  Archbishop  as  correct, 
and  then  submitted  by  the  said  party  for 
the  decision  of  the  Court  of  the  Arch- 
bishop without  pleading  or  evidence, 
With  a  right  of  appeal  to  the  Privy  Conn- 
til,  and  with  power  for  the  Court,  if  the 
ftatement  of  the  case  should  appear  to 
ba  in  any  way  defective,  to  refer  back 
■wen  case  to  the  Bishop  or  Archbishop 
»r  amendment. 

The  Commissioners  intimated  that  their 
intention,  in  making  these  recommenda- 
'  ■'"/;',  was  simply  to  provide  a  special 
facility  for  restraining  variations  from  ea- 
•fMished  usage  without  interfering  with 
the  genera]  law  of  the  Church  as  to  orna- 
"Kaits,  or  the  ordinary  remedies  now  in 
farce. 

Fouhtu  Sbbies,  Vol.  XXI  — 


As  this  report  only  contained  recom- 
mendations, it  has  no  practical  influence 
upon  the  controversy.  Of  much  greater 
importance  was  a  decision  of  the  Judicial 
Committee  of  the  Privy  Council  in  the  cele- 
brated case  of  Martin  vs.  Mackonochie. 
The  Rev.  Mr.  .Mackonochie  has  been  for 
years  one  of  the  boldest  of  the  Ritualistic 
innovators,  and  he  was  therefore  selected 
by  tho  new  Low  Church  Society,  the 
Church  Association,  to  test  in  his  case  be- 
fore the  highest  court  of  the  laud  the  law- 
fulness of  some  of  the  most  startling  inno- 
vations. Mr.  Mackonochie  was  originally 
charged:  1.  With  elevating  the  elements 
during  the  prayer  of  consecration.  2.  With 
kneeiiug  before  them  during  the  same 
prayer.  3.  With  using  lighted  candles  on 
the  communion-table  during  the  celebra- 
tion of  the  holy  communion  when  they 
were  not  required  for  the  purpose  of 
giving  light,  -i.  With  using  incense  in 
the  same  service.  5.  With  mixing  water 
with  the  wine. 

The  elevation  Mr.  Mackonochie  discon- 
tinued before  the  suit  commenced,  and 
he  was  admonished  not  to  resume  it. 
A  judgment  of  the  Court  of  Arches  had 
condemned  the  use  of  incense  and  of 
water.  It  admitted,  however,  the  law- 
fulness of  lighted  candles,  and  considered 
the  kneeling  a  minor  point  of  order, 
which,  if  raised  at  all,  should  be  referred 
to  the  discretion  of  the  Bishop.  This  de- 
cision with  regard  to  caudles  and  to 
kneeling  was  reversed  by  the  Judicial 
Committee  of  the  Privy  Council,  which 
ruled  that  kneeling  during  the  prayer  of 
consecration  is  contrary  to  the  rubric, 
and  that  lighted  candles  are  not  admis- 
sible. While  giving  its  decision  on  this 
particular  case,  the  Court  also  gave  its 
opinion  on  several  important  general  prin* 
ciples.  With  respect  to  the  kneeling,  the 
Court  observe  that  the  posture  of  the 
officiating  minister  is  prescribed  by  vari- 
ous directions  throughout  the  communion 
service.  He  is  directed  when  to  Stan  t 
and  when  to  change  this  posture  for  that 
of  kneeling.  But  it  is  expressly  ordered 
that  the  prayer  of  consecration  is  to  be  said 
by  the  priest  "standing  before  the  table," 
and  there  is  no  indication  that  he  is  in- 
tended to  change  his  posture  during  the 
prayer.  To  the  objection  made  by  the 
defense,  that  this  was  one  of  those  minute 
detads  which  the  rubric  could  not  he  held 
to  cover,  the  Court  made  the  important 
answer  that  it  is  not  for  any  minister  of  tho 
Church,  or  even  for  themselves,  to  assume 
that  any  departure  from  or  violation  of 

19 


294 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


[April, 


the  rubric  is  trivial.  The  use  of  lighted  I  to  kneeling  at  the  holy  communion,  gram- 
candles  raised  a  question  of  even  greater  j  matically,  and  that  there  was  good  rea- 
signilicance  and  importance.  The  Ritual- 1  son  for  accusing  the  highest  court  of  ap- 
ists  claimed  to  be  justified  in  adopting!  peal  of  "playing  fast  and  loose:"  "loose" 
any  practice  which  the  Prayer  Book  does'  whenever  it  is  the  question  of  allowing 
not  especially  condemn,  and  in  retain-  <  any  matter  of  faith  to  be  disbelieved ; 
ing  as  lawful  whatever  is  not  expressly  "fast"  when  it  is  the  qtiestion  of  not  al- 
abolished.  They  appealed  to  certain  in-  j  lowing  any  thing  to  be  believed  which 
junctions  in  the  first  year  of  Edward  VI,  •  popular  prejudice  disbelieves, 
and  their  counsel  even  went  back  to  the  I  The  Ritualists  were  not  agreed  as  to 
time  before  the  Reformation,  pud  quoted  i  the  course  to  be  pursued  in  consequence 
a  constitution  made  by  a  Roman  Catholic  I  of  this  judgment  of  the  Privy  Council. 
Council  held  under  the  Archbishop  of  Some  were  in  favor  of  obeying  the  law 
Canterbury  in  1322.  The  Court  dismissed  of  the  land,  and  found  some  consolation 
those  references  as  irrelevant,  and  laid  it  \  in  the  fact  that  the  judgment  did  not  di- 
down,  in  direct  opposition  to  the  prin- ;  rectly  assail  articles  of  faith.     A  large 


ciplo  of  the  Ritualists,  that  all  ceremonl 

are  abolished  which  are   not  expressly 
retained  in  the  Prayer  Book.     Tin's  they 


meeting  of  clergy  and  laity  belonging  to 
the  Ritualist  party  was  held  on  Jan;;  iry 
12.  in  London,  to  agree  upon  a  plan  of 


regard  as  being  placed  beyond  doubt  by  j  action.     Archdeacon   Deuison   presided, 


Elizabeth's  Act  of  Uniformity,  now  ap- 
plicable to  the  present  Prayer  Book, 
which  prohibits  any  rite,  ceremony,  order, 
or  form  which  is  not  mentioned  in  the 
Prayer  Book,  and  declares  void  alf  prior 
usages  and  ordinances.  The  opening 
rubric,  again,  orders  that  "  such  orna- 
ments of  the  Church  and  of  the  min- 
isters thereof  shall  be  retained,  and  bo 
in  use,  as  were  in  this  Church  of  England, 
by  authority  of  Parliament,  in  the  second 
year  of  King  Edward  VI."  The  Ritualists 
have  argued  from  this,  that  whatever  was 
lawful  in  the  designated  year  of  Edward 
VI  is  lawful  now.     The  Court,  however. 


and  an  elaborate  report,  drawn  up  by  a 
Committee  appointed  at  a  preparatory 
meeting,  was  read,  concluding  with  cer- 
tain resolutions  which  appeared  by  the 
Committee  to  be  required.  On  these  a 
long  discussion  took  place,  the  Hon.  C. 
Lindley  Wood,  the  Rev.  T.  V.  Perry, 
and  others,  counseling  submission  to  the 
law  of  the  laud  under  protest;  while  the 
Rev.  W.  J.  Bennett  of  Frome,  the  Rev.  C. 
J.  Le  Geyt  of  St,  Matthias,  Stoke  New- 
ington,  and  others,  opposed  this  course, 
and  supported  an  amendment  which 
was  worded  as  follows :  "  Therefore  this 
meeting   is   unable  to  reconcile   submis- 


now  distinctly  explain  that  those  things  |  siou  to  the  present  decree  with  its  para- 
only  possess  the  authority  of  Parliament    mount  and  primary  duty  of  obedience  to 


which  are  expressly  in  the  named 
Prayer  Book  referred  to.  It  is  nothing 
to  the  point,  that  the  candles  were 
lawful  at  the  time  when  the  Prayer 
Book  was  issued.  They  are  not  pre- 
scribed in  it,  and  they  are,  therefore, 
abolished. 

The  judgment  was  delivered  on  the 
23d  of  December.  The  formal  order  an- 
nouncing the  judgment  was  issued  by 
the  Quoen  in  Council  on  the  11th  of. Ian 


the  Church,  and  can  only  wait  in  patience 
the  providence  of  God."  Ultimately  a 
resolution  was  passed  declaring  that  the 
meeting  did  not  consider  the  existing 
Court  of  Final  Appeal  "  qualified  to  de- 
clare the  law  of  the  Church  of  England 
upon  either  doctrine  or  ceremonial;"  but 
with  respect  to  the  particular  judgment 
of  the  Court  in  Mr.  Mackonochie's  case, 
the  meeting,  "  feeling  the  great  difficulty 
of  the   present   case,   thinks   there   are 


uary,  promulgated  in  the  otlicial  London]  many  reasons  why  those  who  have  used 
GvzkHc  of  January  15,  and  is  now  the  the  ceremonials  or  practices  now  con- 
law  of  the  land,  as  fully  binding  upon  '  demncd  by  the  Judicial  Committee  of  the 
the   clergy   as   any  act  on   the   statute  ,  Privy  Council  may  be  anxious  to  wait 


book. 

All  the  parties  in  the  Church  of  En- 
gland were  agreed  that  the  judgment 
was  a  heavy  blow  to  the  Ritualists.  The 
whole  of  the  Ritualistic  party  denounced 
the  judgment  as  an  act  of  gross  injustice. 


rather  than  to  give  immediate  elfect  to 
the  decision  so  pronounced,  and  consid- 
ers it  is  a  matter  best  left  to  the  individ- 
ual judgment  and  circumstances  of  each 
priest  who  has  been  accustomed  to  use 
the  ceremonials  in  question."     A  resolu- 


Dr.  Pusey,  in  a  letter  to  the  London    tion  was  also  adopted  declaring  the  cou- 

Timcs,  complained  that  the  Judicial  Com-    demnatiou    of  Mr.    Mackonocble    in   the 
inittoc  had  not  interpreted  the  rubric,  as  I  costs  of  the  caso  to  be  "  a  course  of  un- 


1869.] 


•Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


295 


usual  and  exceptional  severity."  On  the 
13th  of  January  another  meeting  of  Rit- 
ualists was  held,  composed  almost  ex- 
clusively of  those  who  are  in  favor  of 
continuing  the  altar  lights  and  other 
practices  condemned  by  the  Judicial 
Committee  of  Privy  Council.  A  long 
and  very  earnest  conversation  took  place, 
In  which  Mr.  Bennett.  Mr.  Orby  Shipley, 
Mr.  Edwards.  Mr.  Lewder,  and  other 
gentlemen  joined.  It.  was  generally  ad- 
mitted that  it  would  be  very  unwise  to 
bind  the  clergy  as  a  body  to  any  particu- 
lar course,  inasmuch  as  circumstances 
differed  in  various  parishes,  and  some 
might  feel  it  to  be  their  duty  explicitly  to 
obey  the  law  of  the  Church  on  those 
points  where  it  differed  from  the  law  of 
the  land  as  recently  expounded  by  the 
High  Court  of  Appeals.  Several  clergy- 
men had  determined  to  continue  the 
lights,  at  all  events  until  they  would  re- 
ceive a  monition  from  a  spiritual  author- 
ity. The  question  of  the  prosecution  of 
Mr.  Benuett  on  doctrinal  matters  was 
alluded  to,  and  it  was  generally  admitted 
that,  in  the  event  of  the  Judicial  Com- 
mittee of  the  Privy  Council  decreeing 
that  the  Real  Preseuce  in  the  Eucharist 
is  antagonistic  to  the  doctrines  of  the 
Church  of  England,  (he  High  Ohwch party 
must,  oj  a  body,  secede. 

The  future  developments  of  the  Rit- 
ualistic controversy  cannot  fail  to  be  of 
great  importance.  The  party  is  strong 
and  numerous,  and  while  many  are  will- 
ing to  submit  for  the  present  to  laws 
which  prohibit  the  outward  exhibition  of 
their  religious  belief,  they  hope  that  their 
party  will  in  the  course  of  time  succeed 
in  changing  those  laws.  Some,  as  has 
already  been  stated,  even  admit  that  they 
may  soon  b'e  compelled  to  leave  the 
Church  of  England  and  establish  an  in- 
dependent A  nglican  Church.  Much  larger 
is  the  number  of  those  who  are  fa- 
vorable to  a  separation  between  Church 
and  State,  as  they  believe  their  prospects 
in  a  freo  Church  to  be  much  better  than 
ii':  a  State  Church.  Dr.  Pusey  concludes 
his  letter  to  the  London  Times,  which  has 
already  been  quoted,  with  the  words :  "  If 
the  union  of  Church  and  Stato  involve: 
fl'is  ultimate  laxity  and  more  than  rig 
Wness  in  the  construction  of  our  formu 
lanes,  involving  the  denial  of  true  doc- 
trine and  the  prohibition  of  practice 
which  represents  doctrine,  it  certainly 
•ill  be  the  earnest  desire  and  prayer  of 
Churchmen  that  the  precedent  now  being 


set  as  to  the  Irish  Establishment  may  be 
speedily  followed  as  to  the  English." 
And  Dr.  Mackonochie,  in  his  letter  to 
the  London  Times,  says:  "Lot  the  State 
send  forth  the  Church  roofless  and  pen- 
niless,  but  free,  and  I  will  say,  'Thank 
you.' " 

In  British  America  the  Ritualists  are 
in  a  decided  minority.  The  Provincial 
Synod,  which  met  at  Montreal,  adopted 
a  resolution  prohibiting  the  elevation  of 
the  elements,  the  use  of  incense,  the 
mixing  of  water  with  wine,  the.  us'1  of 
the  wafer-bread,  of  lights  on  the  com- 
munion table,  and  the  wearing  of  vest- 
ments while  saying  prayers. 

MOHAMMEDANISM. 

Review  of  the  Mohammedan- Would 
—Statistics  of  Mohammedanism  in 
Europe,  Asia,  and  Africa — Important 
Religious  Movements — The  Baris  in' 
Persia — The  "vTahabees  in*  Arabia 
and  India.— While  the  Christian  nations, 
viewed  as  a  whole,  have  for  many  cen- 
turies made  steady  progress,  and  now 
rule  the  whole  of  America  and  Australia, 
nearly  the  whole  of  Europe,  the  larger 
portion  of  Asia,  and  a  considerable  por- 
tion of  Africa,  the  Mohammedan  world 
has  been  in  a  condition  of  progressing 
decay  ever  since  the  advance  of  the 
Turks  in  Europe  was  stopped  at  the 
close  of  the  fifteenth  century.  A  number 
of  Mohammedan  States  have  since  been 
completely  wrecked.  No  new  State  has 
arisen  that  in  any  way  could  be  com- 
pared with  the  great  empires  which, 
during  the  Middle  Ages,  reduced  the 
territory  of  Christendom.  Among  the 
few  independent  States  that  are  left, 
there  is  none  that  can  claim  a  rank 
among  the  great  powers  of  the  world. 
Of  the  internal  condition  of  the  Moham- 
medan countries  but  little  is  generally 
known  among  Christians.  Of  late,  how- 
ever, a  number  of  events  and  movements 
have  attracted  greater  attention,  and  a 
brief  review-  of  the  present  condition  and 
recent  history  of  Mohammedanism  may, 
therefore,  be  of  interest 

By  far  the  largest  and  mosf  prominent 
of  Mohammedan  countries  is  still  the 
Turkish  Empire.  On  the  religious  sta- 
tistics of  the  empire,  a  work  pul 
by  a  high  Turkish  official  in  L867,  on 
occasion  of  tho  Paris  Exhibition,  (/." 
Tunprie  d  T Exposition  Oniverseilede  1867: 
par  S.  Exc,  Salaheddin  Bey,)  gives  the 
following  figures : 


296 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


[April, 


Religion  and  Race.  Europe. 

Mohammedans: 

Osmani ....   4,492,000 

Arabs,  Moors,  etc 

Syrians,  Chaldeans,  etc 

Druses 

Kurds 

Tartars 16,000 

Tnrcomanni 

i  Albanians 1,000,000 

Circassians 595,000 

Total  Mohammedans.'..  6,103,000 
Christiaxs  : 

Syrians,  Chaldees 

Albanians  500,000 

Slavi 6,200,000 

Eoumanians 4,000,000 

Armenians 400,000 

'  Greeks 1,000,000 

Total  Christians 12,100,000 

Israelites 70,000 

Gipsies 214,000 

18,487,000 

Other  Turkish  authorities  claim  only 
a  population  of  about  21,000,000  as 
Mohammedans,  and  this  is  the  number 
generally  assumed  by  the  best  Christian 
statisticians.  Embraced  in  the  popula- 
tion set  down  as  Mohammedans  are 
several  sects,  as  the  Druses,  the  Ansa- 
rians.  and  the  Ismaelians,  which  in  many 
points  differ  from  the  large  divisions  of 
Mohammedans,  and  should  rather  be 
classeJ  as  entirely  different  religions. 
This  is  especially  the  case  with  the 
Druses.  The  Turks  belong  to  that  di- 
vision of  Mohammedans  who  are  called 
Sunnites.  The  Sultan  is  regarded  as 
the  head  of  the  religion,  and  at  least 
as  the  chief  protector  of  all  the  Sun- 
nites who  live  outside  of  Turkey.  Un- 
til recently  Turkey  was  as  much  an 
ecclesiastical  State  as  the  Papal  terri- 
tory; the  Koran  constituted  the  code  of 
law  and  charter  of  rights,  as  well- as  the 
religious  guide  of  the  followers  of  Mo- 
hammed, and  there'  was  the  closest  con- 
nection between  the  ministers  oi  religion 
and  the  professors  and  interpreters  of 
the  law.  Doth  together  formed  the  class 
of  "Ulema,"  governed  by  the  "Sheik- 
ul-Islam,"  the  former  being  called  "  Mol- 
lahs,"'  and  the  latter  '•Muftis."  But  of 
late  the  Mohammedan  character  of  the 
Turkish  Empire  has  been  considerably 
modified.  Christians  have,  of  late,  been 
appointed  to  many  of  the  highest  offices. 
Iu  1308  a  Christian,  Daud  Pasha,  was 
appointed  Minister  of  Commerce,  and  a 


Per  Cent- 
Asia.  Africa.  Total,    of  Toi/n 

10,700,000       15,102,000  88' 

900,000  5,050,000  5,050,000  14'SS 

75,000        75,<:'00  -18 

30,000        SO.OoO  -07 

1,000,000       1,000,000  2-50 

20,000        36,000  -09 

85,000        85,000  -21 

1,000,000  2-50 

413,000        1,OOS,000  252 

13,223,000      5,050,000      24,376,000    60-95 

160,000        1GO,000        -40 

500,000  1-25 

6,200,000  15-50 

4,000,000  10' 

2,000,000    2,400,000  6- 

1,000,000    2,000,000  5- 

3,160,000   15,260,000  88-15 

80,000   150,000   -37 

214,000        -53 

10,463,000       5,050,000      41,000,000      100. 

Council  of  State  was  organized,  consist- 
ing of  fifty  members,  a  large  number  of 
whom  are  Christians.  As  will  be  seen 
from  the  above  table,  the  Mohammedans 
are  largely  iu  a  minority  in  the  European 
provinces  of  the  Empire,  some  of  which, 
Servia,  Montenegro,  and  Roumania,  to- 
gether with  a  population  of  6,000,000, 
are  semi-independent,  possessing  their 
own  independent  administration,  and 
only  paying  to  the  Sultan  an  annual 
tribute.  They  have  no  Mohammedan 
population  whatever.  The  other  Chris- 
tian provinces  are  aspiring  to  the  same 
degree  of  independence,  and  the  central 
government  finds  it  necessary  to  make 
them  concessions  and  graut  them  pro- 
vincial institutions. 

Die  possessions  iu  Africa  comprise 
Egypt,  Tripoli,  and  Tunis,  all  of  which 
have  independent  governments  which 
only  pay  an  animal  tribute  to  the  Sultan. 
Xo  important  religious  movements  have 
of  late  taken  place  among  the  Moham- 
raedaus  of  Turkey.  The  intercourse 
with  Christian  nations  begins  to  exercise 
a  considerable  influence  upon  both 
Church  and  school. 

Next  to  Turkey,  the  most  important 
Mohammedan  country  in  the  world  is 
Persia.  Its  total  population  is  estimated 
at  from  live  to  nine  millions,  that  of  the 
non-Mohammedans  at  from  75,000  to 
330,000.  The  Mohammedans  are  mostly 
of  the  sect  called  Shiites  or  Bheahs, 
differing  to  somo  c.xteut  in  religious  doc- 


1869.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


297 


trino  and  more  in  historical  belief  from  j  a  revolution.  He  replied  that  the  time 
liie  Stmnites  of  the  Turkish  Empire.  |  had  not  yet  come. 
rheSunnites  of  Persia,  who  live  especially  j  The  other  "wholly  Mohammedan  coun- 
iu  Kurdistan,  betweeu  the  Persian  Gulf  tries  of  Asia  are  Arabia,  with  4,000.000; 
Bad  the  Caspian  Sea,  number  altogether  i  Afghanistan,  with  4,000,000;  Beloochis- 
tbout  1,500,000  souls.  I  tan,  with  2,000,000;   Toorkistan,  or  In- 

The  Persian  priesthood  consists  of ;  dependent  Tartary,  with  7,870.000.  Java 
many  orders,  the  chief  of  them  at  the  has  among  its  14,500,000  inhabitants 
present  time  being  that  of  Mooshtehed,  about  12.000,000  Mohammedans.  In 
tf  whom  there  are  but  five  in  number  m  India  there  are  about  18,r>00,000.  In 
the  whole  country.  Xext  in  rank  to  the  '  China  Mohammedans  are  numerous  in 
Mooshtehed  is  the  Sheik-ul-Islam,  or  the  northwestern  provinces.  Russia  has 
ruler  of  the  faith,  of  whom  there  is  one  :  2,090,000  Mohammedan  inhabitants  in 
in  every  large  town,  nominated  by  and  i  its  European  provinces,  2,000  in  Poland, 
receiving  his  salary  from  the  Govern-  ,  1.970,000  in  the  Caucasus,  ],6u0.<>00  in 
ment.  Under  these  dignitaries  there  are  I  Siberia :  altogether,  5,602,000. 
three  classes  of  ministers  of  religion,  the  j  The  total  Mohammedan  population  in 
Mooturelle,  oue  for  each  mosque  or  place  Europe  may  be  estimated  at  8,000,000; 
of  pilgrimage;  the  Muezzin,  or  saver  of  and  in  Asiaat  from  75  to  S0,000,000.  In 
prayers;  and  the  Mollah,  or  conductor  j  Europe  it  is  steadily  losing  ground,  while 
of  rites.  in  Asia,  while  its  power  and  influence  are 

Persia  is  the  seat  of  one  of  the  few  !  on  the  decrease,  its  territory  has  for  a 
preat  movements  which  have  shaken  the  I  long  time  neither  increased  nor  decreased. 
Mohammedan  world  during  the  present  |  In  Africa,  Mohammedanism  is  the  estab- 
eeniury,  the  sect  of  the  Babis.  The  j  lished  religion  in  the  Turkish  dependen- 
lirst  full  account  of  this  sect  was  given  |  cies,  Egypt,  Tripoli,  and  Tunis,  which 
in  a  work  by  Count  Gobineau,  formerly  j  have  already  been  referred  to.  It  also 
French  embassador  in  Persia,  (Leslie-  prevails  in  Marocco  and  in  Algeria.  From 
ligums  et  les  Philosophies  VAsie  Cenirale.  ';  the  north  and  east  it  has  penetrated  into 
Paris,  I860,)  from  which  the  full  state-  .  the  interior,  where  it  is  said  to  be  still 
ment  of  their  doctrines  and  history  in  steadily  gaining  ground  among  the  Pagan 
M'Clintock  and  Strong's  Cyclopaedia  has  j  tribes. 

been  derived.  The  sect  originated  in  j  Christianity  as  yet  has  made  but  little 
1843,  and  spread  with  great  rapidity,  j  progress  among  the  Mohammedans,  and 
It  teaches  the  unity  and  immortality  of,  the  number  of  converts,  both  to  any  of 
the  Godhead;  declares  that  all  things  are  |  the  Protestant  Churches  or  to  Roman  Ca- 
emanations  from  God,  and  in  the  day  j  tholicism,  are  few.  The  only  serious  in- 
judgment  will  bo  reabsorbed  in  him.  i  road  upon  the  territory  of  Mohammedan- 
Bab,  the  founder,  interdicted  polygamy  ,  ism  that  lias  been  made  during  the 
and  concubinage,  forbade  or  greatly  re-  j  present  century  was  made  by  the  Babis 
Btricted  divorce,  and  abolished  the  use  referred  to  above.  Of  the  recent  move- 
nt the  vail.  Cruelly  persecuted  by  the  ments  within  the  borders  of  Mohammed- 
l'er.sian  Government,  they  risked  after  j  anism,  by  far  the  most  important  is  the 
iho  death  of  the  Shah,  in  1848,  an  armed  ;  progress  made  by  the  sect  of  the  Waha- 
resistance.  They  were  conquered,  and  '  bees.  This  sect  is  of  recent  origin ; 
the  Government  endeavored  to  extermi- 1  their  founder,  Wahab,  having  been  horn 
"ate  the  sect.  All  members  thai  Were  ,  about  the  close  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
koown  to  the  Government,  including  the  I  tury.  Their  original  seat  was  Arabia, 
Bab  himself,  were  put  to  death.  Bui  a  |  where  they  tried  to  restore  a  primitive 
new  Bab  was  elected  and  established  ;  and  vigorous  Mohammedanism  in  the 
himself  at  Bagdad,  in  Asiatic  Turkey,  !  place  of  the  decay  which  had  spread 
nnd  was  thus  safe  from  interference,  but  throughout  the  country.  Early  in  the 
ilt  the  same  time  in  constant  communi-  present  century  they  became  dangerous 
cation  with  the  vast  Dumber  of  Persian  to  the  holy  cities  of  Mecca  and  Medina; 
pilgrims  who  pass  through  that  city  for,  regarding  both  the  Turks  and  Per- 
y*arly,  among  whom  he  is  continually  sians  as  idolatrous,  they  prevented  tho 
•inning  converts,  who  in  turn  teach  the  '  caravans  of  these  countries  from  reaching 
new  doctrino  at  home.  In  1660  the  j  the  two  cities.  The  Mohammedans  of 
Bab  was  urged  by  several  Persian  Turkey  and  Persia  became  greatly  cx- 
exilea  to  take  advantage  of  tho  disorgan- 1  cited  at  this,  and  tho  Sultan  of  Constan- 
Bed  condition  of  tho  empire  and  attempt  I  tinople,    as    tho    natural    protector   of 


298 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


[April, 


Mohammedanism,  deemed  it  his  duty  to 
crush  the  daring  heretics.  The  Pasha 
of  Egypt,  Mehemet  Ali,  was  charged 
with  tins  duty  in  1804;  but  nothing  was 
done  against  the  Wahabees  until  1811, 
and  the  object  of  the  expedition  was  not 
accomplished  until  ISIS.  The  chief  of 
the  sect  was  sent  to  Constantinople  and 
beheaded.  For  some  time  little  was 
heard  of  the  Wahabees;  but  soon  their 
power  was  asrain  felt,  and  when  Palgrave, 
in  1SG3,  and  Colonel  Pelly,  in  1865, 
visited  Central  Arabia,  they  found  a 
powerful  Wahabee  empire  in  existence, 
threatening  to  swallow  up  the  whole 
peninsula.  Still  the  isolation  of  Arabia 
from  the  Christian  world  is  so  great  that 
but  littie  was  known  about  their  move- 
ments. In  the  latter  part  of  1868  the 
important  news  was  received  that  the 
Iraaum,  or  spiritual  ruler  of  Muscat,  had 
been  dethroned,  and  the  chief  of  the 
"Wahabees  had  succeeded  him.  Muscat 
is  the  most  powerful  of  all  the  Arab 
States,  extending  to  about  116,000  square 
miles,  and  containing  some  2,500,000 
inhabitants.  The  city  of  Muscat  is  the 
key  to  the  Persian  Gulf,  and  a  most  im- 
portant center  of  trade,  where  the  pro- 
ductions of  Europe,  Africa,  and  the  East 
are  exchanged.  Its  population  is  already 
G0,000,  and  is  increasing  with  great 
rapidity.  The  possession  of  the  city  and 
the  empire  of  Muscat  gives  to  the  Waha- 
bees the  whole  of  Central  aud  Eastern 


Arabia,  and  as  they  are  no  less  hostile  to 
the  Turkish  and  Persian  Mohammi 
than  to  the  Christians,  it  cannot  fail  thai 
before  long  they  will  come  into  collision 
with  the  neighboring  countries. 

The  same  sect  has  for  many  years  been 
causing  considerable  trouble  in  British  In- 
dia. An  outbreak  which  they  attempted 
in  1S6S  was  promptly  put  down;  but  at 
the  close  of  the  year  the  Government  re- 
ceived information  of  a  Mussulman  con- 
spiracy, "having  its  ramifications  spread 
over  Bengal  north  aud  east  of  the  G  ange  s." 
According  to  tire  "Friend  of  India."  all 
classes  were  taking  an  active  interest  in 
the  attempt  to  bring  about  the  re-estab- 
lishment of  a  Mussulman  empire.  "For 
years  they  have  been  contributing  their 
means  for  this  purpose.  A  regular  rate 
of  taxation  is  laid  down  by  the  leaders, 
and  cheerfully  accepted  by  the  people." 
The  "Friend"  enters  into  detailed  state- 
ments of  the  method  of  taxation,  and 
discloses  circumstances  which  fill  the 
English  authorities  in  India  with  dis- 
quietude. It  is  promised  by  the  preach- 
ers of  the  coining  "Jehad."  "that  the  land- 
tax  shall  be  lifted  from  the  Mussulman 
and  imposed  only  on  the  Hindoo.  Con- 
sequently the  peasantry  sympathize  with 
the  plot  to  a  man.  At  all  events  it  seems 
to  be  certain  that  in  the  history  of  Moham- 
medanism during  the  nineteenth  century 
the  movements  of  the  Wahabees  will 
occupy  a  prominent  place. 


Art.  VIE.— SYNOPSIS  OF  THE  QUARTERLIES,  AND  OTHERS  OF 
THE  HIGHER  PERIODICALS. 

American   Quarterly  Reviews. 

American  Presbyterian  Review,  January,  1SG0.  (New  York.)— 1.  Dr.  Asa 
Burton's   Theological   System.      2.  The  true   Character  of  the  Adopting  Act. 

3.  The  Union  Question  in  Scotland.  4  The  Scholar  of  To-day.  5.  l>r.  Baird's 
History  of  the  New  School.  6.  The  Canon  Muratorianus.  7.  The  Interpreta- 
tion of  Bible  Word-Pictures.  8.  Our  Currency  and  Specie  Payments.  9.  Chris- 
tian Anthropology.  10.  Assyria  and  her  Monuments.  11.  The  Theosophy  of 
Franz  Baader.      12.   Lay  Eldership. 

BAPTIST  Quart  eiii.y.  January,  1860.  (Philadelphia.)—!.  The  Education  that  we 
Need.      2.    Difficulties   of  Infant   Baptism.       3.  Deacons    and    the   Dun- 

4.  Suggestions  for  Expository  Preaching.  5.  Ritualism  in  the-  Church  of  En- 
gland.    6.  The  Bible  Doctrine-  of  the  Weekly  Sabbath. 

Bibuotukca  Sacra,  January,  1869.  (Andover.) — 1.  The  Origin  of  the  first 
three  Gospels.  2.  Christian  Baptism,  Considered  in  Reference  to  the  Act  and 
the  Subjects.  3.  Revelation  aud  Inspiration.  4.  The  Natural  Theology  of 
SocialScience.  5.  What  \Vine  shall  we  use  at  the  Lord's  Supper?  G.  Notes 
on  Egyptology. 


1S09.J  Synapsis  of  the  Quariedcs.  299 

CHRISTIAN  Quarterly,  January,  1869.  (Cincinnati.) — 1.  Modern  Preachers  and 
preaching.  2.  The  Fellowship.  3.  An  Infallible  Church,  or  au  Infallible  Book 
— Which?  4.  Religion  and  Science.  5.  Indifference  to  Tilings  Indifferent. 
C.  The  Secret  of  Roman  Catholic  Success.  7.  The  Union  of  Christians — How 
can  it  be  accomplished?  S.  The  Union  Movement — What  will  come  of  it? 
9.  Bishop— Overseers. 

EFASGEtiCAL  QUARTERLY  Review,  January,  1S69.  (Gettysburg.) — 1.  Foreign 
Missions.  2.  Life  and  Labors  of  Oberlin.  3.  Experience  and  Practice  as 
Necessary  in  Religion  as  in  Science.  4.  Melchizedelc.  5.  The  Conflict  in  the 
Church.  G.  Codex  Sinaiticus.  7.  How  shall  we  order  our  Worship?  S.  The 
Reformation:  Its  Occasions  and  Cause.  9.  The  Evangelical  Lutheran  Church  in 
the  United  States  of  America.  10.  The  Lutheran  Doctrine  of  the  Sabbath  and 
the  Lord's  Day. 

MERCERSBCRGH  Review,  January,  1SG9.  (Philadelphia.) — 1.  The  Church  and 
the  School.  2.  The  Angels,  3.  The  Relation  of  the  Old  Testament  to  the 
New.  4.  The  Christian  Conception  of  History.  5.  The  Historical  Element  in 
Theology.  *G.  Origin  and  Structure  of  the  Apostles'  Creed. 

New  Exglander,  January,  1869.  (New  Haven.)— 1.  The  System  of  Instruction 
at  West  Point:  Can  it  be  Employed  in  our  Colleges?  2.  How  to  Build  a 
Nation.  3.  The  Renaissance  in  China.  4.  The  American  Colleges  and  the 
American  Public.  5.  Professor  Porter's  Work  on  the  Human  Intellect.  6.  The 
Presbyterian  Disruption  of  1S3S— A  Review  of  Rev.  Dr.  S.  J.  Baird's  History 
of  the  "New  School." 

Noimi  American  Review,  January,  I860.  (Boston.)— 1.  Gottfried  Wilhelm 
Leibnitz.  2.  The  Mental  Faculties  of  Brutes.  3.  The  Tariff  of  the  United 
States:  Shall  it  be  Augmented  or  Diminished  at  the  coming  Session  of  Congress? 

4.  Sir  Richard  Steele,  u.  The  New  Catalogue  of  Harvard  College  Library. 
G.  Railroad  Inflation.  7.  Karl  Otto  von  Bismarck-Schonhausen.  S.  The 
Revolution  in  England.     9.  A  Look  Before  and  After. 

U.n'iversalist  Quarterly,  January,  18G9.  (Boston.) — 1.  Religion,  Science, 
Education.     2.  Do   Groot's    Basilides.     3.    John    Murray.     4.  Religious   Duty. 

5.  The  Power  and  Duty  of  Congress  in  Respect  to  Suffrage.  G.  The  Crusades. 
7.  What  Constitutes  a  Christian?  8.  The  Ancient  and  Modern  Greek  Testa- 
ments Compared. 

The  "  Universalist  Quarterly  "  is  not  to  be  ranked  in  that  class 
of  literature  which  claims  the  Christian  name  in  order  to  invali- 
date the  truth  of  Christianity,  It  is  reverent  in  its  spirit,  seeks 
to  establish  its  doctrines  by  a  legitimate  exegesis  of  the  sacred 
text,  and  rejoices  in  the  accession  of  new  evidence  for  the  authen- 
ticity of  the  Gospels.  An  instance  of  this  is  the  article  on  De 
Groot's  Basilides. 

That  even  heretics  may  be  good  for  something  appears  from 
the  remarkable  fact  that  the  earliest  and,  in  some  respects,  strong- 
est proof  of  the  authenticity  of  our  Gospels  comes  not  from  the 
catholic  but  from  the  heretical  side.  This  arises  partly  from  the 
fact  that  the  heretical  post  evangelic  writers  on  record  happen  to 
be  earliest,  and  partly  from  their  hostile  position,  by  which  their 
testimony  possesses  something  of  the  force  of  an  unwilling  con- 
cession to  the  truth  of  the  catholic  canon.  The  discovery  of  the 
writings  of  llippolytus,  according  to  De  Groot,  revolutionizes  in 
a  great  degree  the  form  of  the.  historical  argument,  and  gives  it  a 


300  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and  [April, 

new  force  by  placing  at  the  head  of  historical  vouchers  the  name 
of  the  heretic  Basilides. 

Basilides  is  shown  from  Hippolytus,  confirmed  by  other  testimo- 
nies, to  have  lived  earlier  than  has  hitherto  been  claimed,,  his 
flourishing  lii'e  extending  from  97  A.  D.  to  138.  He  claimed  to 
have  been  the  personal  pupil  of  the  living  Apostle  Matthias.  He 
must  have  been  twenty-five  or  thirty-five  years  contemporary 
with  the  Apostle  John.  Yet  this  Basilides,  it  is  said,  quotes 
unequivocally  passages  from  the  Gospels  of  John  and  Luke  and 
from  Paul's  Epistles  to  the  Romans,  first  and  second  Corinthians, 
and  Ephesians.  The  formulae  with  which  he  makes  his  quotations 
are  considered  decisive,  that  not  only  he,  but  the  general  Chris- 
tian body  for  whom  he  wrote,  held  these  books  as'  canonical 
Scripture  on  the  same  basis  with  the  Old  Testament. 

These  facts,  combined  with  the  researches  of  Tischendorf,  con- 
stitute, it  is  claimed,  a  noticeable  epoch  in  the  history  of  Chris- 
tian evidences.  Christian  scholars  have  felt  that  just  the  period 
which  Basilides  covers  is,  from  absence  of  documents,  the  weakest 
place  in  the  series  of  historical  proofs.  There  is  not,  indeed,  quite 
a  "missing  link."  The  striking  testimony  of  Justin  Martyr 
bridges  over  the  period.  "We  have  conclusive  reason  for  believ- 
ing that  the  lines  of  Christian  Bishops,  as  well  as  the  successions 
of  all  the  leading  Christian  Churches,  were  the  unquestionable 
conductors  of  a  concurrent  and  faithful  guardianship  of  the  Chris- 
tian documents  on  this  silent  period.  Yet  the  evidence  might  be 
greatly  strengthened,  and  a  new  corroboration  of  a  very  important 
character,  though  making  but  a  slight  figure  in  Paley,  is  now 
claimed  in  the  testimony  of  the  heretic  Basilides. 

Will  some  one  of  our  leisurely  studeuts  of  German  theology 
give  us  a  full  analysis  of  De  Groot  and  Basilides? 

Princeton  Review,  January,  lSGf).  (New  York.) — 1.  Afrassiz  on  Provinces  of 
Creation,  and  the  Unity  of  tin.'  Race.  2.  Manual  of  the  Foreign  Missions  of  the 
Presbyterian  Church.  "3.  Christian  Work  in  Egypt  4.  A  Method  of  Teaching 
Religion  in  a  College.     &.  Romanism  at  Rome.  "*6.  Baird's   History  of  the  New 

School. 

The  first  article  deals  with  Agassis'  theory  that  the  human 
races  have  originated  from  various  centers  corresponding  with 
the  genetic  centers  of  the  lower  orders  of  being.  The  writer 
denies  the  reality  of  any  such  centers  for  either  plants,  auimals, 
or  man.  Agassiz  confessedly  fails  in  showing  the  confinement  of 
men  during  the  historical  ages,  and  is  therefore  compelled  to  pre- 
sume it  as  existing  during  the  pre-historical  period,  which,  it.  is 
claimed,  removes  his  theory  from  the  region  of  science  to  the  region 


I869J  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  301 

of  conjecture,  and  leaves  the  biblical  account  both  historically 
and  scientifically  uncontradicted.  The  writer  of  the  article  is 
particularly  successful  in  showing  that  the  races  of  America  and 
Polynesia  cannot  be  considered  as  certainly  indigenous. 

In  the  great  and  wavering  battle  on  the  origin  of  the  human 
race,  the  victory  at  the  present  hour  seems  very  decisive  in  favor 
of  the  unity  of  origin  within  a  period  not  far  different  from  that 
assigned  by  sacred  chronology.  We  must,  nevertheless,  wait  for 
further  developments. 


English  Reviews. 

British  Quarterly  Review,  January,  1S69.  (London.) — 1.  Literary  Forgeries. 
2.  Davidson  on  the  New  Testament.  3.  Gustavo  Dore.  4.  Church  Principles 
and  Prospects.  5.  Dr.  Vaughau — In  Memoriam.  C.  The  New  Parliament  and 
Mr.  Gladstone. 

Edinburgh  Review,  January,  1869.  (New  York:  Reprint.) — 1.  Spain  under 
Charles  II.  2.  Lord  Kin^sdown's  Recollections  of  the  Bar.  ?..  Cesarian  Rome. 
4.  Trench's  Realities  of  Irish  Life.  5.  The  Legend  of  Tell  and  Rutli.  6.  Gov- 
ernment Telegraphs.  7.  Dean  Milman's  Annals  of  St.  Paul's.  8.  Hunter's 
Annals  of  Rural  Bengal.  9.  General  Ulysses  Simpson  Grant.  10.  ill-.  Bright's 
Speeches. 

London  Quarterly  Review,  January,  1SC9.  (London.)— 1.  Life  of  William 
Blake.  2.  The  Plymouth  Brethren  and  the  Christian  Ministry.  3.  Philosophy 
and  Positivism.  4.  Social  and  Religious  Progress  in  India.  5.  Algernon  Charles 
Swinburne — Poet  and  Critic.  6.  George  Macdonald  as  a  Teacher  of  Religion. 
1.  The  Mythical  and  Heretical  Gospels.     8.  Tcrtulliau. 

Westminster  Review,  January,  1 869.  (New  York :  Reprint.) — 1 .  The  Struggle  for 
Empire  with  the  Mahrattas.  2.  Richardson's  Clarissa.  3.  Our  Criminal  Pro- 
cedure, especially  in  cases  of  Murder.  4.  Mr.  Bright's  Speeches.  5.  Art 
and  Morality.  6.  The  Adulteration  of  Food  and  Drugs.  7.  Mr.  Darwin's 
Theories. 


Akt.  IX.— QUARTERLY  BOOK-TABLE. 
Religion,  Theology,  and  Biblical  Literature. 

Tat  Controversy  between  Trw>  and  Pretended  Christianity :  An  Essay  delivered  be- 
fore the  Massachusetts  Methodist  Convention,  held  in  Boston,  October  15,  1868. 
By  Rev.  L.  T.  Townsknd,  Professor  of  Historical  Theology  in  the  Boston  Theo- 
logical   Seminary.      Published   by.  voto   of  the    Convention.      2-lmo.,   pp.    82. 

'     Bustun:  Loo  &  Shepard;  James  P.  Magee.     1S69. 

Mr.  Townsend's  pamphlet  is  a  timely  exposure  of  what  may  be 
called  the  double-entendre  theology.     We  suppose  it  requires  no 

groat  wit  or  talent  to  write  a  parody  on  some  line  piece  of  poetry. 
^  ery  little  more  ability  does  it  require,  by  means  of  special  defini- 
tions and  artful  double  meanings,  to  so  furnish  a  homiletical  parody 


302  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

of  evangelical  phraseology,  as  to  make  a  Rationalistic  lecture  sound 
very  much  like  an  orthodox  Christian  sermon.  Two  sets  of  hearers 
in  the  congregation  may  receive  two  trains  of  studiously  maintained 
meanings.  The  discourse  may  have  an  evangelic  and  an  infidel  side 
to  it,  quite  amusing  to  the  hearer  who  understands  both  sides. 
To  an  unsophisticated  hearer,  the  same  sophisticated  preacher 
may  seem  at  one  time  a  high-toned  Methodist,  at  another  time  a 
scandalous  skeptic.  What  Mr.  Townscnd  does  here,  with  great 
effect,  is  to  select  one  of  these  doppek/cingers,  Mr.  Freeman  Clarke, 
and  bring  him  face  to  face  with  himself.  Mr.  Clarke,  alternately 
the  ape  of  evangelieism  aud  the  real  animal  of  Rationalism,  is  made 
to  appear  in  his  true  duplicity.  An  extended  series  of  extracts  is 
given  from  Mr.  Clarke's  writings,  in  which  the  style  of  evangelical 
preaching  is  parodied,  followed  by  another  series  which  contains  a 
full  rejection  of  all  evangelical  religion,  together  with  the  key  to 
the  real  nature  of  the  parody.  The  exposure  is  complete.  This 
was  a  work  which  needed  to  be  done,  and  the  Professor  has  per- 
formed the  work  trenchantly  and  conclusively. 

His  pamphlet  treats:  1.  The  parties  engaged,  analyzing  the 
various  sections  of  Rationalism  ;  2.  The  points  at  issue,  showing 
.them  to  be  the  fundamentals ;  3.  The  duty  to  be  done;  and  4.  The 
spirit  to  be  maintained.  It  is  a  timely  tract,  deserving  a  wide  dif- 
fusion and  a  reflective  reading. 

The  question  of  exchanging  evangelical  Christian  pulpits  with  sec- 
taries who  not  only  refuse  to  worship  the  Son  of  God,  but  who  them- 
selves affiliate  without  repugnance  with  Pantheists  and  Atheists  of 
the  most  outspoken  type,  as  opened  by  Professor  Townsend,  is  a  very 
serious  matter.  First,  there  arc  no  speakers,  writers,  or  periodicals  at 
the  present  day  more  sectarian,  more  exclusive  or  supercilious  toward 
those  with  whom  they  differ, than  the  so-called  Literalistic  or  Rational- 
istic, "What  publications  of  the  day  are  more  truly  sectarian  than  the 
Atlantic  Monthly,  the  North  American,  or  the  Nation  ?  We  have 
seen  nothing  so  bitterly  sectarian  as  silly  Charles  F.  Nortou's  late 
article  in  the  North  American,  maintaining  that  Atheism  forfeited  no 
title  to  respect,  and  denouncing  the  entire  body  of  the  ministry  of  the 
American  Fvangelic  Church  in  the  most  disgraceful  and  mendacious 
style.  Second.  The  question  of  the  importance  of  Christian  dogmas 
is  now  at  stake.  Men  like  Parker,  who  are  just  as  dogmatical  as  the 
Christian  theologians,  deride  the  very  term  dogma,  and  maintain 
that  doctrines  are  the  transient  form,  and  not  the  permanent  reality, 
of  Christianity.  Mr.  Ruckle,  on  being  asked  the  probable  destiny 
of  religion,  replied  that  theology  is  vanishing,  hut  religion  is  in- 
creasing.   Mr.  Froudc  tells  us  that  God  gave  vs  the  Gospel,  but  that 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  303 

the  devil  gave  us  theology.  This  is  the  key-note  of  the  -whole  anti- 
Christian  song,  the  proper  antistrophe  to  which,  is  the  firm  mainten- 
ance, by  the  evangelical  Church,  of  her  sacred  truths.  We  know  no 
mode  more  proper  of  emphasizing  our  determination  to  stand  fast 
in  our  faith,  properly  so  called,  than  to  decline  surrendering  our 
pulpits  to  the  deliverance  of  an  occasional  parody  of  our  doctrinal 
phraseology  by  those  who  really  deny  at  all  times,  in  terms  of  ab- 
horrence, the  real  essence  of  our  doctrinal  truth.  Third.  In  all  con- 
sistency  they  must  hold  us  and  the  whole  Christian  Church,  includ- 
ing Greek,  Roman,  and  Protestant,  to  be  idolaters,  the  worshipers 
of  a  man,  or,  at  any  rate,  of  a  being  less  than  God.  The  chasm, 
then,  between  us  is  broad  and  deep.  They  ought  not  to  share  in, 
much  less  to  lead,  or  to  consent  to  share  or  lead,  a  worship  they 
must  condemn.  If  we  could  unite  with  them  in  a  worship  which 
excludes  the  Son  of  God,  how  can  they  conscientiously  unite  with 
us  in  a  worship  which  their  creed  pronounces  to  be  idolatrous — 
thus  making  both  us  and  themselves  Pagans.  Freeman  Clarke, 
and  his  whole  sect,  is  further  divided,  both  in  creed  and  worship, 
from  the  Christian  Church  than  from  the  Mohammedan  mosque  or 
the  Jewish  synagogue.  If  their  view  be  correct,  Mohammed  has 
done  more  to  abolish  idolatry  in  the  world  than  Jesus.  Mr.  Clarke, 
then,  might  very  consistently,  like  a  good  Mollah,  join  in  the  formula, 
"There  is  one  God,  and  Mohammed  is  his  prophet."  In  fine,  as 
Alger  and  his  set  are  justly  convicted  by  the  editor  of  Zionh  Herald 
of  Ilindooism,  so  Mr.  Clarke  and  his  section  seem  involved  in  Islam- 
ism.  If  the  former  arc  clearly  Buddhists,  the  latter  are  as  clearly 
Moslems.  Mr.  Clarke  in  the  last  Atlantic  declares  that  the  Mo- 
hammedans are  in  fact  but  "  a  heretical  Christian  sect."  Why 
"heretical,"  Mr.  Clarke?  Why  are  they  not  the  most  orthodox 
Church  in  the  world,  save  the  Unitarians  of  Boston?  We  think 
Mr.  Clarke  and  a  Mollah  might  readily  exchange  pulpits ;  but  we 
see  not  how  either  could  consistently  enter  an  orthodox  pulpit  and 
lead  in  Trinitarian  worship. 


A  Grammar  of  the.  Idioms  of  the  New  Testament,  prepared  as  a  solid  basis  for  tho 
Interpretation  of  the  New  Testament  By  Dr.  George  Benedict  "Winer.  Sev- 
enth Edition,  Enlarged  and  Improved,  by  Dr.  Gottlieb  Lunkmakx.  Revised 
and  Authorized  Edition.  Svo.,  pp.  7-JS.  Andover:  "Warren  F.  Draper.  Lon- 
dou :  Trubuer  &  Co.  Lcipsic :  P.  C.  W.  VogeL  Philadelphia :  Smith,  Engle,  4 
Co.     18C9. 

Winer's  great  work  on  the  Grammar  of  the  New  Testament, 
first  issued  by  him  in  1822,  was  intended  to  curb  the  prevalent 
license  of  many  leading  commentators,  who,  assuming  that  the 


304  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

Xew  Testament  authors  wrote  regardless  of  grammar,  were 
pleased  to  disregard  grammar  in  their  modes  of  interpretation. 
Such  a  commentator  would  change  the  tense  or  the  article  of  his 
original  at  will,  and  so,  instead  of  construing  the  meaning  of  the 
author,  would  substitute  a  meaning  of  his  own.  Winer  made  it 
his  life  work  to  study  the  sacred  Greek  in  comparison  with  the 
secular  and  with  the  Hebrew,  and  so  to  analyze  thoroughly  its 
modes  of  expression  as  to  ascertain  what  were  its  laws  of  gram- 
mar, and  thereby  to  bring  these  lawless  exegetes  to  order.  He 
availed  himself  of  every  aid  in  the  successive  editions  to  revise 
and  perfect  his  work.  After  his  sixth  edition  he  closed  his  labors 
with  his  life,  leaving  a  body  of  loose  notes,  which  have  been 
faithfully  wrought  into  the  last  edition  by  his  literary  executor, 
Dr.  Lunemann.  This  last  edition,  brought  iuto  English  with 
great  care  by  Prof.  J.  Henry  Thayer,  is  now  issued  in  the  best 
style  of  the  Andover  press. 

Part  first  of  the  work  is  a  profound  but  concise  treatment  of 
the  nature  of  the  Xew  Testament  diction.  The  history  of  opin- 
ions is  given,  and  the  definite  results  attained  touching  the  rela- 
tions of  its  style  in  comparison  with  classic  Greek,  the  ancient 
Hebrew,  and  later  Aramaic.  Part  second,  under  the  head  of 
Grammatical  Porms  of  Words,  treats  the  New  Testament  or- 
thography, inflections,  and  verbal  formations.  Part  third  is  a 
very  full  analysis  of  the  Syntax,  illustrated  by  so  immense  a  num- 
ber of  examples,  quoted  from  the  sacred  text,  that  we  may  say 
that  the  entire  Xew  Testament,  so  far  as  it  has  any  syntactical 
peculiarities,  is  brought  under  a  scientific  grammatical  analysis. 
The  volume  concludes  with  two  very  valuable  indexes  :  first,  of 
all  the  Greek  terms  and  phrases  analyzed  in  the  body  of  the  work; 
the  second,  of  all  the  passages  in  the  order  of  theinoccurrcncr-  in 
the  Xew  Testament,  beginning  with  Matthew  and  ending  with 
Revelation.  Thus,  after  a  due  study  of  the  Grammar,  the  scholar 
may  take  his  Greek  Testament,  and,  by  aid  of*  the  last  index,  go 
through  a  complete  grammatical  commentary  on  the  sacred  text. 
For  the  commentator  and  theologian  the  work  is  invaluable  as  an 
aid  and  umpire;  not  absolute  and  perfect,  indeed,  but  suggestive 
and  regulative. 

The  Hew  Testament.  Translated  from  the  Greek  Text  of  Tisehcndorf,  by  GEORGE 
R.  Notes,  D.  D.,  Professor  in  Harvard,  12mo.,  pp.  570.  Boston:  American 
Unitarian  Association.     1809. 

This  eminent  Unitarian  biblical  scholar  rested  about  a  year  since 

from  his  earthly  labors.     He  has  left,  we  suppose,  few  successors  in 


1869.1  Quarterly  Book-Table.  305 

his  denomination  sufficiently  reverent  of  the  sacred  volume  toe;nu- 
late  bis  labors — a  sad  comment  on  the  tendency  of  the  "higher 
criticism."  Though  issued  from  a  denominational  "  association," 
Dr.  Xoyes  interposes  a  caveat  against  the  supposition  of  its 
chiming  any  other  than  an  individual  character.  Though  doubt- 
ing the  preferableness  of  some  of  Teschendorf's  readings,  he  avoids 
:ill  suspicion  of  ruling  the  text  with  doctrinal  preferences  by  ad- 
hering strictly  to  Teschendorf's  text.  The  few  and  brief  notes 
are  (unless  the  note  on  John  i,  5,  bo  an  exception)  equally  free  from 
doctrinal  prepossessions.  In  the  translation  the  two  chief  words 
rendered  hell  in  the  common  version  are  very  properly  rendered 
by  different  terms,  though  we  question  whether  hades  is  suitably 
represented  by  "underworld."  The  probable  etymology  of  the 
Greek  word  indicates  invisibility,  not  subterraneity  ;  and  it  would 
have  been  better  to  have  transferred  the  Greek  word  to  the 
English  text.  There  are  many  other  minuter  points  which  we 
should  have  rendered  differently,  but  few  or  none  involving  dog- 
matic differences.  On  the  whole,  we  cannot  review  this  last  work 
of  the  departed  scholar  without  avowing  a  profound  respect  for 
his  learning,  candor,  and  freedom  from  the  arrogance  and  irrever- 
ence which  so  often  characterize  the  issues  of  rationalistic  au- 
thorship. 

Dr.  Xoyes  very  properly  made  the  established  version  the  basis 
of  his  work,  varying  only  as  sufficient  reason  seemed  to  require. 
His  text  is  paragraphed,  with  the  chapters  and  verses  designated 
in  the  margin.  With  a  handsome  page  and  well-defined  type,  it 
presents  a  fair  aspect  to  the  eye.  To  those  who  wish  occasion- 
ally to  read  a  translation  somewhat  relieved  from  the  embarrass- 
ments of  the  established  version  the  volume  has  little  that  is 
objectionable. 

Ou  1  Cor.  ii,  S,  Dr.  Xoyes  says:  "By  this  citation,  which,  at 
hast  according  to  the  text  of  Teschendorf,  forms  an  uncompleted 
sentence,  the  Apostle  seems  to  declare  that  the  knowledge  of 
Divine  wisdom  comes  to  Christians  not  from  the  senses,  but  from 
inward  experience  ;  from  the  contact  of  the  human  spirit  with  the 
Spirit  of  God." 

Origin,  Articles,  and  Central  Rules  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Gkttrch  2-lmo.,pp.  27, 
stiff  muslin  cover.  New  York;  Carlton  £ Lanahan.  Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  4 
Walden.     1SG0. 

'"  tins  neat  copy  of  our  General  Rules,  etc.,  is  inclosed  a  handsome 
I ':  mk  Certificate  of  Membership.  It  is  a  very  convenient  form  in 
which  both  can  be  put  together  into  the  hands  of  our  people. 


306  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 


Foreign  Theological .  Publication s. 

Geschichte  der  Predigt  in  der  Deutscken  Evangelischen  Kirche.     [History  of  Preaching 

in  the  German  Evangelical  Church,  from  Mosheim  until  the  hist  years  of  Schleier- 
maclicr.]  Pp.  viii,  384.  15y  Dr.  Kakl  Sack.  Heidelberg:  Carl  Winter. 
1S66. 

Properly,  a  history  of  preachers.  The  author  has  for  many  years 
been  immediately  connected  -with  the  German  pulpit.  He  has 
heard  many  sermons  in  his  own  and  other  countries,  has  been 
sixteen  years  a  pastor  himself,  has  preached  for  longer  time  than 
many  of  his  clerical  associates,  and  for  thirty-six  years  it  has  been 
his  duty  to  pronounce  opinions  on  the  sermons  of  students,  candi- 
dates, and  pastors.  In  addition  to  this  experience,  he  brings  to 
his  historical  undertaking  the  further  and  greater  advantage  of  a 
high  appreciation  of  the  rigid  necessity  of  the  earnest  evangelical 
element  in  all  preaching  of  the  Gospel.  He  speaks  of  the  preach- 
er's call  thus  :  "  Christ,  as  Head  of  the  Church,  and  Dispenser  of 
the  Holy  Spirit's  gifts,  gives  to  certain  members  of  his  Church 
both  the  call  and  the  power  to  preach  his  word  aright."  This 
recognition  of  the  divine  call  of  the  ministry  would  furnish  a  satis- 
factory key  to  the  general  position  of  the  author,  even  if  his  long 
and  laborious  life  in  behalf  of  an  elevated  Christian  pulpit  were 
less  familiar  to  his  many  friends  and  large  class  of  readers. 

The  history  of  preaching  in  the  Evangelical  German  Church  is 
divided  into  two  periods.  The  first  commences  properly  with  the 
year  1730,  when  the  Leibnit/.ian .  philosophy  exerted  a  powerful 
influence  upon  the  whole  German  Church.  The  upper  classes 
were  disinclined  to  any  religious  service,  and  the  pulpit  was  at  a 
very  low  ebb.  Mosheim  gave  new  influence  to  the  preaching  of 
the  Gospel,  for  his  great  versatility  of  talents  compelled  the.  re- 
spect of  even  the  most  violent  enemies  of  Christianity.  The  first 
period  closes  with  Ewald  and  the  celebrated  Reinhard  in  1810. 
This  space  of  eighty  years  is  subdivided  into  clearly  defined  theo- 
logical tendencies,  each  of  which  has  its  group  of  sympathizing 
minds.  The  first  tendency  was  that  of  the  elder  practical  super- 
naturalism,  (1730-1770,)  when  Jerusalem,  Spalding,  Teller,  and 
Sturm  were  the  principal  preachers  of  their  time.  The  second 
tendency  is  the  biblical  and  historical,  (1770-1700,)  which  is  char- 
acterized by  five  celebrated  names,  Lavater,  Herder,  Ewald,  Oe- 
tinger,  and  Hess.  There  was  a  decided  tincture  of  mysticism  in 
the  preaching  of  this  stadium,  as  may  be  imagined  from  the  mere 
mention  of  Lavater  and  Oetinger.  The  last  tendency  of  the  first 
period  was  that  of  Christian  morality,  (1785-1810.)     There  were 


1869.]  Quarterly  JBooh-TaUe.  307 

many  preachers  in  the  group ;  but  if  we  except  Zollikofcr,  Hiifeli, 
];.  inhard,  and  Ewald,  they  have  mostly  disappeared  from  histori- 
cal prominence.  The.  second  period  commences  with  1810,  and 
concludes  with  the  present  time.  Its  beginning  was  characterized 
:,v  the  revival  of  the  pulpit  of  Protestant  Germany.  The  long- 
dominant  Rationalism  had  failed  to  give  satisfaction,  and  the 
Church  had  been  so  generally  converted  into  a  mere  lecture  room 
for  moral  discussion  that  devout  minds  called  for  a  reform  in 
preaching.  Schleiermacher  clothed  the  pulpit  with  new  attrac- 
tions, for,  rare  genius  as  he  was,  he  was  able  to  command  the  re- 
spect  of  the  "  despisers  of  religion."  His  preaching  was  of  a  high 
order,  and  Ave  must  judge  it  not  by  the  present  style  of  clerical 
oratory,  but  by  the  style  in  vogue  when  he  preached  to  his  de- 
lighted audiences  in  Berlin.  All  was  dead  around  him ;  people 
despised  the  very  mention  of  public  services  ;  the  sermon  was  re- 
garded sheer  cant,  the  preacher  a  mere  laborer  for  his  bread. 
.Schleiermacher  may  in  short  be  regarded  the  reformer  of  the 
German  pulpit  in  the  nineteenth  century.  Harms,  by  his  popular 
style  and  enthusiastic  spirit,  became  one  of  the  most  noted  preach- 
ers of  this  period.  Draseke  and  Theremin  characterized  the  re- 
ciprocal influence  of  the  literary  culture  and  pious  life.  The 
renewal  of  Rationalism  presents  but  one  name  of  note,  Rohr. 
The  present  influence  of  theological  science  on  the  German  Evan- 
gelical pulpit  is  represented  by  C.  J.  Xitzsch  and  Professor 
Tholuck. 

The  difficulty  of  preaching  in  such  a  way  as  to  meet  the  great 
requirements  of  the  present  day  must  not  be  ignored.  The  divis- 
ion of  German  Protestantism  into  so  many  Churches,  the  e;reat 
controversies  which  have  enlisted  the  attention  and  participation 
of  so  many  minds,  and  the  new  attacks  made  on  the  citadel  of 
Christian  faith,  unite,  to  impose  a  heavy  burden  on  the  preacher  of 
the  Gospel.  But,  contends  Dr.  Sack  with  the  glow  of  hope,  the 
most  recent  period  of  the  history  of  preaching  in  Germany  is  very 
encouraging.  From  1S30  to  1850  the  pulpit  has  put  on  new 
strength,  and  in  many  places  God's  work  has  been  revived.  There 
H  a  strong  tendency  to  go  down  into  the  depths  of  scriptural 
truth  and  bring  up  new  and  old  things  for  the  needy  congrega- 
tion. The  life  of  Christ  is  portrayed  before  the  illiterate  as  it 
"ever  has  been.  In  the  present  ohms  there  is  nothing  whatever  to 
fear.  Still,  much  reformation  is  needed  in  the  delivery  of  the  great 
truths  of  God.  The  young  preacher's  studies  must  not  be  ener- 
vating but  strengthening;  he  must  be  ever  looking  at  his  great 
work;   his  aim  must  be  the  building  up  of  God'fl   kingdom  on 


30S  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April; 

earth,  and  not  gaining  the  applause  of  the  cultivated  among  the 
audience.  The  sermon,  to  do  good,  must  he  full  of  thought,  car- 
nest,  powerful.  The  thoughts  must  be  simply  arranged,  and  with 
a  careful  eye  to  divine  truth.  The  Holy  Spirit  will  give  success 
to  tire  word  if  faith  and  love  pervade  the  heart.  The  great  truths 
of  revelation,  clustering  around  the  person  and  work  of  Christ, 
must  be  fed  to  the  people  as  Christ  fed  the  hungry  multitude. 
We  would  he  glad  to  see  this  historical  sketch  of  Dr.  Sack, 
which,  we  regret,  touches  far  too  lightly  upon  the  vagaries  of  the 
German  pulpit  during  the  last  century  and  a  quarter,  in  the  hands 
of  each  of  the  hundreds  of  theological  students  in  the  universities 
of  Germany  and  Switzerland. 


Die  Mosaische  StlftshuUe.  (The  Mosaic  Tabernacle.)  By  Dr.  Cn.  Johx  Rigqenbach. 
Mit  drei  lithographierten  Tafeln.  Zweite  mit  einer  Anhangvermehrte  Ausgabe. 
4to.     Pp.  62.     Basel:  C.  Detloff.     1867. 

Still  another  work  in  the  department  of  apologetics.  The  many 
thrusts  made  by  later  skeptics— to  say  nothing  of  their  predeces- 
sors— at  the  typical  and  historical  character  of  the  Mosaic  taber- 
nacle have  made  necessary  a  new  work  on  that  subject  from  the 
orthodox  stand-point.  Tire  able  manner  in  which  Dr.  Riggenbach 
lias  accomplished  his  task  proves  him  to  be  eminently  a  master  of 
Old  Testament  as  well  as  of  New  Testament  criticism.  He  has 
spent  years  of  labor,  on  this  work,  and  the  call  for  the  present  en- 
larged edition  is  testimony  that  his  toil  has  found  an  appreciative 
circle.  The  first  part  of  the  volume  contains  a  description  of  the 
Mosaic  tabernacle,  while  the  second  treats  of  the  authenticity  of  the 
scriptural  account  and  the  real  meaning  of  the  tabernacle.  The 
minute  and  matter-of-fact  description  of  the  tabernacle  furnished 
by  Moses  is  claimed  to  be  a  strong  proof  of  the  historical  fact  ; 
legendary  poetry  dues  not  deal  in  such  particulars.  This,  how- 
ever, is  only  one  of  the  many  proofs  of  the  orthodox  view  of  the 
tabernacle  ;  but  the  ingenious  and  well-guarded  way  in  which  the 
Doctor  makes  it  occupy  a  place  in  his  mass  of  cumulative  argument 
is  really  admirable.  "  It  has  been  a  long  time  the  custom,"  says 
he,  "to  speak  contemptuously  of  the  tabernacle  as  an  unhistorical 
fancy  .  .  .  but  I  can  say  with  confidence  that  this  is  not  the  tvay 
adopted  by  j>oc(ry.  A  description  so  devoid  of  excitement,  so 
minute,  and  so  matter-of-fact,  must  be  that  of  something  which 
had  a  real  existence.  Then  when  we  come  to  compare  the  results 
of  our  calculation  of  the  measurement  of  the  tabernacle  with  the 
real  purpose  served  by  it,  the  conclusion  is  incontestable,  that  every 


I860.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  309 

part  of  tlie  Mosaic  account  is  perfectly  historical.  The  structure 
was  also  so  completely  commensurate  with  the  great  purpose  of 
its  institution  that  it  bears  every  trace  of  the  wisdom  of  the  divine 
Architect.  It  is  a  unit  in  the  history  of  art."  Dr.  Riggenbach 
will  not  allow  the  strictly  typical  application  of  each  part  of  the 
tabernacle,  for  in  this  way,  he  says,  the  validity  of  the  whole  is 
compromised.  His  comparison  of  the  external  purity  of  the 
tabernacle  and  the  value  of  its  gold,  to  the  purity,  divinity,  and 
majesty  of  Christ  is  a  gem  of  learned,  practical,  attractive,  and  de- 
vout criticism.  The  lithographic  tables  representing  the  different 
parts  of  the  tabernacle  form  a  welcome  addition  to  the  work. 


Die  Eihik  Luther's  in  ihren  Grundsateen.  [The  Ethics  of  Luther  in  their  Grounding.] 
Bv  Chr.  Ebnst  Luthardt,  Consistorialrath  und  Professor  der  Theologie. 
Pp.116.    Leipzig:  Dorffling  und  Frauke.     1867. 

The  last  half  century  has  been  very  fruitful  in  German  works  on 
Ethics.  For  the  past  thirty  years  in  particular  there  has  been  great 
attention  bestowed  on  this  branch  of  theological  science.  Daub, 
Harless,  Schleiermacher,  Rothe,  Marheinecke,  Bdhnier,  Schmid, 
Wnttke,  Palmer,  and  Oulmann,  with  a  large  number  of  less  im- 
portant authors,  have  followed  each  other  in  quick  succession. 
The  path  of  interpreting  Luther's  Ethical  System  has  been  less 
frequently  trodden,  though  Fabricius  (Loci  Communes  I).  M. 
Liitheri,  1594)  and  Schramm  (de  Meritis  Lutheri  in  Theologiam 
Moralem,  1711)  have  even  here  had  a  good  number  of  followers. 
The  excellence  of  Dr.  Luthardt's  work  consists  in  its  concise, 
pointed  style,  and  in  its  being  the  result  of  a  careful  investigation 
of  the  whole  mass  of  Luther's  works.  Tn  the  preface  the  present 
position  of  Ethical  Science  is  stated  in  full,  and  opinions  are  passed 
upon  all  who  have  attempted  to  state  Luther's  system  from 
Schramm  down  to  Kostlin.  We  then  have  the  Introduction,  in 
which  the  difference  between  Theological  and  Philosophical  Ethics 
is  given.  I.  The  Person  of  the  Christian.  The  new  man  is  one 
who  has  been  justified  by  faith — which  faith  is  a  very  different 
thing  from  the  scholastic  definition  of  faith.  Christianity  is  some- 
thing internal  as  well  as  external.  The  Christian  is  free  from  the  law 
of  works.  II.  The  Christian's  Feeling.  Love  prevails  over  all 
:i"d  ndes  in  all.  Still  there  is  a  bitter  hatred  of  sin  in  all  its  forms. 
Hi.  The  Christian's  Works.  First  of  all  comes  prayer,  in  which 
the  believer  must  always  abound.  Then  come  all  the  works 
which  a  sincere  love  of  Cod  and  man  can  prompt.  Dr.  Luthardt  does 
not  disguise  the  fact  that  Luther  approved  of  dancing  and  driuk- 
Eoukih  Series,  Vol.  XXL— 20 


310  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.    '  [April, 

ing,  (see  page  112,)  but  explains  it  on  the  ground  of  his  animosity 
to  all  sanctimoniousness.  Whether  a  man  must  adopt  these  two 
fashionable  vices — no  doubt  fashionable  in  Luther's  day — in  order 
to  avoid  Pharisaism  is  a  question  very  easily  answered.  The 
Doctor  appends  to  every  one  of  his  statements  of  Luther's  ethical 
opinions  the  corresponding  places  in  the  Reformer's  works. 


Philosophy,  Metaphysics,  and  General  Science. 

Moral  Uses  of  Dark  Things.    By  Horace  Busuxkll.    12Q10.,  pp.  3G0.    New  York: 
Charles  Scribner  &  Co.     1869. 

The  existence  of  a  creating  Mind,  Mr.  Bushnell,  with  his  usual 
force  and  brilliancy  of  language,  claims  the  right  to  assume  in  his 
very  commencing  paragraph.  "  "What  we  all  see  with  our  eyes  I 
think  I  have  some  right  to  assume,  namely,  that  this  whole  frame 
of  being  is  bedded  in  Mind.  Matter  itself  is  not  more  evident  than 
the  2>Iind  that  shapes  it,  fills  it,  and  holds  it  in  training  for  its  uses. 
Philosophy  itself,  call  it  Positive  or  by  any  other  name,  is  possible 
'only  in  the  fact  that  the  world  is  cognate  with  mind  and  cast  in 
the  molds  of  intelligence.  And  then,  as  it  belongs  inherently  to 
mind  that  it  must  have  its  ends,  the  all-present  Mind  must  have 
reference  to  euds,  and  the  whole  system  of  causes  must  at  bottom 
be,  exactly  as  we  see  it  to  be,  a  system  of  tiual  causes."  This  is  at 
once  a  comprehensive  statement  and  a  conclusive  argument. 

But  after  this  great  positive  assumption  there  follows  a  great 
problem  to  be  solved.  There  are  in  our  system  things  whimsical, 
tilings  not  beautiful,  things  that  seem  expressly  contrived  for  harm, 
and  things  accomplished  in  a  bad  way  that  might  easily  have  been 
accomplished  in  a  good  way. .  Herbert  Spencer  boldly  and  skill- 
fully adduces  them  as  clear  refutations  of  "the  theory  of  the  late 
Dr.  Paley,"  that  there  is  an  intelligent  and  benevolent  God.  To 
the  whole  argument  a  very  brief  and  conclusive  reply  is  given  by 
Mr.  Abbot  in  the  North  American  Review,  quoted  in  our  last 
Quarterly,  that  since  so  overwhelming  a  display  of  Keasou  exists 
in  the  Universe  we  have  ample  reason  for  a  firm  assurance  that 
there  is  a  reason  for  these  subordinate  facts.  And  there  ever 
remains  an  undisturbed  validity  in  the  reply  of  our  old  Theology, 
that  it  cannot  be  shown  that  the  very  best  system  is  not  a  system 
with  defects;  that  the  allowance  of  the  defects  may  secure  a 
higher  excellence  on  the  whole  than  the  disallowance.  Just  so  a 
man  by  incurring  and  retaining  indebtednesses  becomes  the  mill- 
ionaire who  must  otherwise  have  been  a  pauper. 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  311 

Wc  have  here,  be  it  noted,  not  a  theorem  to  be  demonstrated, 
hut  a  problem  to  be  solved.  Our  solutions  may  not  be  one  but 
many.  Some  of  them,  individually,  may  be  satisfactory,  even 
without  being  the  true  ones;  nay,  subsequent  scientific  develop- 
ments may  partially  disprove  their  validity.  But  that  fact  does 
not  prove  the  illegitimacy  of  our  attempt  at  furnishing  solutions, 
just  as  error  in  reasoning  does  not  prove  the  illegitimacy  of  all 
attempts  at  reason.  The  weekly  Nation,  a  year  or  two  sine*', 
flagellated  Agassiz  for'  finding  proofs  of  divine  wisdom  in  cer- 
tain natural  arrangements,  and  charged  him  with  low  catering 
to  popular  opinion  for  finding  God  in  his  works.  The  charge  was 
based  upon  the  fact  that  proofs  of  this  kind  are  sometimes  found 
illusory  ;  and,  ergo,  no  such  proofs  should  ever  hereafter  he  ad- 
duced ;  a  logic  which  would  put  an  end  to  all  probable  reasoning. 

Mr.  Bushnell  addresses  those  who  believe  in  God.  lie  furnishes 
views  of  the  "dark  things"  in  nature,  reconciling  their  existence 
with  the  absolutely  perfect  Divine  Nature,  lie  rejects  many  of 
Paley's  solutions  as  ineffectively  accounting  for  evils  by  showing 
their . resistance  in  physical  good.  In  place  of  such  solutions  Mr. 
Bushnell,  assuming  that  man's  higher  nature  is  justly  the  main 
object  of  Divine  care,  that  the  education  of  the  soul  is  the  true 
purpose  of  the  present  system,  substitutes  a  resultance  in  moral 
good.  He  purposely  gives  his  work  no  precise  systematic  form  ; 
but  furnishes  a  series  of  essays,  possessing  much  of  the.  freedom 
without  the  superficiality  of  the  so-called  "  Essays  "  in  English 
literature.  His  work  serves  the  double  purpose  of  elucidating  our 
faith  in  God  and  giving  us  cheerful  views  of  life.  It  abounds  in 
unique  paragraphs,  opening  fresh  views  of  the  world  and  far- 
extending  vistas.  His  thoughts  are  clothed  in  his  usual  quaint, 
antique,  darkly-brilliant  style  ;  and  this  volume  will  be  found,  per- 
haps, his  most  truly  readable  and  not  least  useful  work. 


m 


story,  Biography,  and  Topography. 


Travel  a,d  Adventure  in  the  Territory  of  Alaska,  formerly  Russian  America,  and  in 
various  other  park  of  the  North  Pacific  By  Frederic  Whymper.  With  Maps 
and  Illustrations.     12mo.,  pp.  363.    New  York:  Harper  A  Broilers.     1869. 

Once  upon  a  time  the  Bear  sold  to  the  Eagle  an  extensive  lot  of 
icebergs,  walruses,  and  earthquakes,  and  thereupon  a  great  debate 
arose  as  to  whether  Bear  had  cheated  Eagle  or  Eagle  had  cheated 
l>car.  In  the  midst  of  the  discussion  neighbor  Bull  happened  to 
occur,  and  as  he  entertained  about  an  equal  liking,  or  rather  dis- 


312  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

liking,  for  both  parties,  be  seemed  an  impartial  referee.  An  ink- 
ling of  bis  verdict  appears  in  the  book  before  ns. 

Mr.  YYhymper  left  England  in  1  S»j3  in  a  ship  bound  for  the 
Pacific,  and  careering  around  Cape  Horn,  touched  at  San  Fran- 
cisco, and  debarked  on  Vancouver's  Island.  Thence  he  made 
various  incursions  into  the  blessed  Alaska,  and  into  Kamschatka 
and  Siberia  in  Asia.  He  terminates  his  narrative  in  California,  of 
which  he  gives  a  very  favorable  and  interesting  account. 

As  to  the  value  of  Alaska  Mr.  Whymper  reports  : 

Thot  Russian  America  is  likely  to  prove  a  bod  bargain  to  the  United  States 
Government  I  cannot  believe.  The  extreme  northern  division  of  the  country  may, 
indeed,  be  nearly  valueless,  but  the  foregoing  pages  will  have  shown  that,  in  the 
more  central  portions  of  the  territory  furs  are  abundant,  and  that  the  trade  in 
them,  which  may  probably  be  further  developed,  must  fall  into  American  hands. 
The  southern  parts  of  the  country  are  identical  in  character  with  the  neighboring 
British  territory,  and  will  probably  be  found  to  be  as  rich  in  mineral  wealth  ;  while 
the  timber,  though  of  an  inferior  growth,  owing  to  the  higher  latitude,  will  yet 
prove  by  no  means  worthless. 

The  fisheries  may  become  of  great  value.  There  are  extensive  cod-banks  oft" 
the  Aleutian  Isles,  and  on  many  other  parts  of  the  coast.  Salmon  is  Vie  common- 
est of  common  fish  in  all  the  rivers  of  the  North  Pacific,  and  is  lated  accordingly 
as  food  only  fit  for  those  who  cannot  get  better.  In  Alaska,  as  in  British  Colum- 
bia, the  fish  can  be  obtained  in  vast  quantities  simply  at  the  expense  of  native 
labur.  To  this  add  the  value  of  salt  (or  vinegar)  barrels,  and  freight,  and  one 
sees  the  slight  total  cost  which  would  be  incurred  in  exporting  to  benighted  Europe 
that  which  there  would  be  considered  a  luxury.  In  Petropaulovski,  a  merchant 
told  me  that  he  had  made  in  this  way  $6,000  in  one  season,  at  no  more  trouble  to 
himself  than  that  incurred  in  a  little  superintendence  of  the  natives  employed.  The 
enterprising  American  is  the  last  man  to  neglect  this  source  of  profit. 

There  is  a  further  reason  why  the  United  States  have  done  well  to  purchase 
this  territory.  It  is  an  act  of  justice  to  the  Russian  government.  For  the  past 
twenty  years  the  whalers  in  Behring  Sea  and  the  Arctic — who  are  mainly  Amer- 
icans— had  traded  at  certain  parts  of  the  coast,  and  had  thereby  considerably  re- 
duced the  profits  of  the  Russian  American  Fur  Company.  Although  nominally 
whalers,  they  were  nearly  all  traders  also.  The  Russians,  albeit  always  hospit- 
able were  naturally  very  averse  to  these  vessels  putting  into  their  parts,  and 
may  be,  trading  under  their  very  noses.  A  large  part  of  the  whaling  captains  had 
consequently  never  visited  many  of  the  larger  Russian  settlements,  such  as  Sitka, 
Ounalaska,  St.  Paul's,  or  St.  Michael's.  Now  all  these,  and  many  other  ports,  are 
perfectly  open  to  them,  while  the  cargoes  of  furs,  walrus'  tusks,  oil,  etc..  will  enter 
San  Francisco,  or  any  other  port  in  the  United  States,  duty  free — an  important 
consideration  to  iliem. 

The  chain  of  the  Aleutian  Isles,  comprising  four  groups,  (the  Fox,  Andreauofi", 
Rat,  and  Blignie  islands,)  is  a  valuable  part  of  the  new  purchase. 

The  acquisition  of  Alaska  has  certainly  awakened  no  enthu- 
siasm, and  the  idea  of  the  annexation  of  Canada  awakens  just  as 
little.  Save  in  the  columns  of  that  knave's  oracle,  the  JYcio  York 
Herald,  we  have  seen  in  no  American  paper  so  decided  an  antic- 
ipation of  such  a  result  as  follows: 

There  are  many,  both  in  England  and  America,  who  look  on  this  purchase  as 
the  first  move  toward  an  American  occupation  of  the  whole  continent,  and  who 
f >r>si.p  that  Canada,  and  British  America  generally,  will  sooner  or  later  become 
part  of  the  United  States.     Looking  at  the  matter  without  prejudice,  I  believe  that 


1869.1  Quarterly  Book-Table.  313 

it  will  be  belter  for  those  countries  and  ourselves  when  such  shall  be  the  case. 
Wt  shall  be  released  from  an  encumbrance,  a  source  of  expense  and  possible 
..  kness;  they,  freed  from  the  trammels  of  periodical  alarms  of  invasion,  and 
feeling  the  strength  of  independence,  will  develop  and  grow;  and — speaking  very 
plainly  and  to  the  point — our  commercial  relations  with  them  will  double  and 
quadruple  themselves  i;i  value.  No  one  now  supposes  that  had  the  United  S 
remained  naught  but  l:  our  American  colonies,"  they  would  have  progressed  as 
Ihey  have  done ;  and  it  is  equally  obvious  that  our  commerce  with  them  n 
bare  been  restricted  in  equal  ratio.  That  it  is  the  destiny  of  the  United  States  to 
I  assess  the  whole  northern  continent  I  fully  believe. 

On  the  ethnology  of  the  Northern  tribes  Mr.  Whymper  gives 
cold  comfort  to  the  Agassizian  doctrine  of  the  plurality  of  the 
human  race : 

Scientific  men  are  now  agreed  on  the  Asiatic  origin  of  the  Esquimaux,  even  of 
those  who  have  migrated  as  far  as  Greenland.*  Of  the  Mongolian  origin  of  the 
Tchuktcbis  themselves,  no  one  who  has  seen  individuals  of  that  people  would  for  a 
moment  doubt.  A  Tchuktchi  boy  taken  by  Col.  Bulkley  (our  en^ineer-in-chief) 
from  Plover  Bay  to  San  Francisco,  and  there  educated  and  cared  for  in  the  fami  ;• 
of  a  kind-hearted  lady,  was,  when  dressed  up  in  European  clothes,  cons 
taken  for  a  civilized  Chinaman,  and  two  of  our  Aleutian  sailors  were  often  simi- 
larly mistaken.  Tins  happened,  it  must  be  observed,  in  a  city  which  is  full  of 
Chinese  and  Japanese.  That  the  Aleuts,  also,  are  of  an  Eastern  stock,  is  to  my 
mind  undoubted. 

The  intertribal  trade  carried  on  so  regularly  every  year  via  Behring  Sir;  its 
(which  is  likely  now  to  receive  a  decided  check  from  the  American  traders,  who 
will  crowd  into  the  country)  proved  with  how  little  difficulty  a  colony  of  ""Wan- 
dering Tchuktcbis  "  might  cross  from  Asia  and  populate  the  northern  coasts  of 
America.  Open  skin  canoes,  capable  of  containing  twenty  or  more  person-  with 
their  effects,  and  hoisting  several  masts  and  sails,  are  now  frequently  to  be 
Observed  among  both  the  sea-coast  Tchuktcbis  and  the  inhabitants  of  Northern 
Alaska.  I  have  seen  others  that  might  be  called  "full-rigged  canoes.''  carrying 
main,  gaff,  and  sprit-sails,  but  these  were  probably  recent  and  foreign  innovati     \ 

I  may  be  excused    if  I   here   allude  to  two  well-authenticated  and   oft-q 
facts.     In  the  years  1832-3,  two    remarkable  and  unintentional  ocean  voyag  — 
one  of  them  terminating  in  shipwreck — were  made  from  Japan  to  the  norr' 
coast  of  America  and  to  the  Sandwich  Islands  by  junks.     The  last  mentioned  is 
known  to  have  been  ten  or   eleven    months    at   sea.  and    had  nine  Jap::: 
board,  who  nevertheless  arrived  safely,  anchoring  in  the  harbor  of  Waialea,  Gala;. 
i-     Sandwich    Islanders,  (Hawaiians,  or,   as  they   are   called  in  California,  etc., 
"Kanakas,)  when  they  saw  these  strangers,  much  resembling  themselves  in  many 
respects,  said,  -It  is  plain,  now,   we  come  from  Asia."     How  easily,  then. 
we  account  fur  the  population  of  almost  Liny  island  or  coast  in  the  Pacific. 

Such  facts  as    these — the  passage    of  comparatively  frail  vessels,    blown 
bom  their  native  coasts  by  typhoons  or  other  usually  violent  gales,  buffeted  . 
lor  lengthened  periods,  yet  eventually  reaching  foreign  coasts  thousands  of  miles 
:t'>m  their  own — should,  I  think,  make  us  very  cautious  in  our  ideas  on  the  limita- 
tion of  native  migrations. 

The  identity  of  the  Greenlanders  with  these  Asiatic  tribes  Mr. 
Whymper  demonstrates  by  the  identity  of  their  language.  The 
mystery  of  the  origiu  of  our  Aborigines  may  be  considered  as 
solved.  They  are  man  starling  eastward  from  the  Asiatic  race- 
center,  and  meeting  here  the  same  man  starting  westward  from 
1^<-  same  center.  At  the  collision  hen-  the  Westerner  has  the 
decided  advantage.     Tempted  by  the  smiling  clime  of  the  East, 

'See  Mark-bam  or.  the  'Greenland  Esquimau."  Journal  of  ttie  Royal  Qeogr  ipl-cal  Society,  IStiS- 


314  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

the  Asiatic  has  been  alternately  enervated  by  the  heats  or  crisped 
by  the  cold  out  of*  the  best  of  his  manhood.  Driven  by  warlike 
invasion,  the  poor  Greenlander  passed  by  the  polar  land  route, 
where  the  continents  are  one,  and  came  out  a  chilled  and  dwarfed 
specimen  of  humanity.  On  the  other  hand  the  Westerner, 
ranging  around  the  temperate  and  well-diversified  latitudes  of 
Europe,  presents  the  highest  development  the  race  has  hitherto 
attained. 


Cliina  and  the  Chinese.  A  General  Description  of  the  Country  and  its  Inhabitants, 
its  Civilizatiou  and  Form  of  Government,  its  Religious  and  Social  Institutions, 
its  Intercourse  with  other  Nations,  and  its  Present  Condition  and  Prospects. 
By  Rev.  Jons  S.  Nevios,  ten  years  a  Missionary  in  China.  With  Maps  and 
Illustrations.     12mo.,  pp.  456.     New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers.     18G9. 

China,  by  a  singular  revolution  in  mundane  affairs  within  a  few- 
years  past,  from  being  our  most  distant  neighbor  toward  the  East 
has  become  our  nearest  neighbor  on  the  West.  A  corresponding 
improved  acquaintance  has  largely  transformed  our  mutual  con- 
tempt and  amusement  into  increased  respect.  We  have  indulged 
large  fun  at  their  "pig-tails,  shaven  pates,  thick-soled  shoes,  as- 
sumption of  dignity  and  superiority,  and  great  ignorance  of  many 
subjects  with  which  we  are  familiar.  They  also  enjoy  a  great  deal 
of  pleasautry  at  our  short-cropped  hair,  tight-titting,  ungraceful,  and 
uncomfortable-looking  clothes,  and  gentlemen's  thin-soled  leather 
boots,  tall  stiff  hats,  gloves  in  summer-time,  the  '  wasp-like  '  ap- 
pearance of  Western  ladies,  with  their  small  waists  and  large 
hoops,  our  ungraceful  manners,  our  remarkable  ignorance  of  the 
general  rules  of  propriety,  and  the  strange  custom  of  a  man  and 
his  wife  walking  together  in  public  arm  in  arm."  Mr.  Nevius 
exhibits  none  of  the  tendency  sometimes  attributed  to  missionaries, 
to  make  the  worst  possible  case  against  heathendom.  He  finds 
not  only  the  noble  basis  that  belongs  to  all  humanity,  but  a  culture 
and  a  morality  entitled  to  a  degree  of  respect.  This  no  more 
forbids  our  giving  the  Gospel  to  China  than  Hellenic  refinement 
forbade  Paul's  mission  to  Athens.  In  fact,  the  entire  view  given 
of  China  by  Mr.  Nevius  is  calculated  to  inspire  an  earnest  mission- 
ary zeal  in  every  Christian  heart. 

Within  the  coming  generation  the  whole  stupendous  mass  of 
superstition  now  covering  this  four  hundred  millions  of  the  human 
race  is,  with  all  the  surety  of  a  mathematical  demonstration,  to 
disappear.  The  reason  of  this  surety  is,  that  the  whole  system  is 
scientifically  false.  A  university  teaching  the  sciences  of  Europe 
is  already  established.     The  truly  powerful  intellect  of  thoughtful 


1SG9.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  815 

China  is  already  awakened,  and,  with  a  rapidity  known  only  to  our 
modern  times,  it  must  reject  the  complicated  mass  of  error  which 
cannot  coexist  with  scientific  truth.  Then  comes  a  stupendous  as 
well  as  a  fearful  vacuum.  "Whether  emptiness  and  skepticism 
(shall  succeed — whether  a  complete  atheistic  blank  shall  remain — 
fu!  arc  history  will  disclose.  To  our  view  every  thing  depends 
upon  the  promptness  and  energy  of  our  Christianity.  To  this  de- 
parting superstition,  as  of  every  other,  our  Christianity  is  the 
rightful  heir.  If  during  the  next  twenty  years  we  can  pour  whole 
phalanxes  of  missionaries  and  whole  floods  of  Christian  light  over 
the  vacated  field,  the  victory  will  be  complete.  Hence,  interesting 
grounds  as  India  and  Africa  are,  no  call  is  so  intensely  imperative 
as  reaches  us  from  this  one  third  of  the  human  race. 

Like  the  work  of  Dr.  Maclay,  issued  from  our  Book  Rooms,  this 
volume  is  replete  with  varied  interest.  That  interest  is  greatly 
enhanced  by  important  events  since  Dr.  Maclay  wrote.  The.  im- 
mense, increasing,  and'  almost  alarming  amount  of  Chinese  popula- 
tion on  our  Pacific  coast — the  mission  of  Mr.  Bnrlingame  bringing 
China  into  diplomatic  intercourse  with  our  Government — the  rapid 
approach  of  a  great  epoch  of  commerce  through  the  Pacific  Rail- 
road, are  events  proclaiming  in  the  ears  of  the  American  Church 
that  her  very  first  duty  Is  China.  We  need  at  this  very  hour  a 
thousand  Methodist  missionaries  for  "the  land  of  the  Sinini." 

The  thanks  of  the  Evangelical  Church  of  all  denominations  are 
due  to  Mr.  Xevius  for  his  clear,  enlightened,  and  instructive 
work. 


Her  'Majesty's  Tvxctr.  By  "William  ITKi'woriTn  Dixon*.  12mo.,  pp.  263.  New 
.  York:  llarpcr  ;iud  Brothers.     18G9. 

Tin-  Tower  of  London,  the  prison  for  England's  great  accused,  as 
Westminster  is  the  tomb  of  her  illustrious  dead,  is  according  to 
Mr.  Dixon,  "the  most  ancient  and  most  poetic  pile  in  Europe." 
Perhaps  he  should  have  said, the  most  tragic.  It  is  the  pivot  upon 
which  has  turned  the  bloody  part  of  England's  political  history. 
The  narrative,  traced  in  chronological  order,  with  much  research 
and  vivid  coloring,  by  Mr.  Dixon,  is  full  of  fearful  and  fascinating 
interest.  Of  all  the  tragic  characters  in  the  solemn  succession, 
Mr.  Dixon's  favorite  is  evidently  Sir  Walter  Raleigh;  ours,  in  the 
full  light  of  the  most  modern  history,  is  that  wonderful  girl  of 
seventeen,  Lady  Jam'  Grey.  Her  talent,  magnanimity,  piety, 
beauty,  and  above  all  her  lolly  firmness  when  the.  turbulent  chiefs 
whose  ambition   led  her  to  ruin  had  abandoned  their  Protestant 


316  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

faith  for  even  a  few  hours  of  protracted  life,  are  a  beautiful  marvel. 
"Without  the  slightest  aim  at  display,  nothing  could  he  more 
heroic  than  her  entire  demeanor  through  the  greatest  of  all  trials. 
A  very  illustrative  engraving  of  the  Tower  is  frontispiece  to  the 
volume. 


Jesus  of  Nazareth,  his  Life  end  Teachings.  Founded  on  the  Four  Gospels,  and 
illustrated  by  reference  to  the  Maimers.  Customs,  Religious  Beliefs,  and  Political 
Institutions  of  his  times.  By  Lyman  Abdott.  With  designs  by  L'oro.  Do 
La  Koche,  Fenn,  and  others.  Red  and  gilt,  12mo.,  pp.  £22.  Xe\v  York: 
Harper  &  Brothers.     1869. 

Mr.  Abbott  has  succeeded  admirably  in  supplying  the  popular  want 
of  a  Life  of  Jesus,  illustrated  with  ample  erudition,  clothed  in 
modern  style  of  language,  and  addressed  to  the  modern  modes  of 
thought.  The  work  of  Kenan  had  shown  how  powerful  was  an 
eloquent  diction  in  giving  place  to  the  great  Subject  in  the  popular 
thought  even  when  divested  of  His  divine  attributes.  The  work 
of  Pressense,  though  written  in  a  vivid  and  elegant  style,  is  too 
loftily  theological  for  the  general  mind.  That  by  Ellicott  is  too 
scholastic  to  be  popular.  Wliat  Henry  Ward  Beecher  will  accom- 
plish, while  much  may  be  anticipated,  is  yet.  to  be  realized.  But 
at  the  present  state  of  progress,  Mr.  Abbott's  work  may  be  recom- 
mended as  the  first  successful  popular  effort  of  placing  the  Saviour's 
life  in  a  clear  and  attractive  li^ht  for  general  readers. 


T7ce  Life,  Tim**,  and  Travels  of  St.  Paul  By  the  Rev.  W.  J.  Coxvbeare.  M.  A..  late 
Fellow  of  Trinity  College,  Cambridge,  and  the  Rev.  J.  S.  HowsOJT,  it.  A.,  Prin- 
•  cipal  of  the  CVllegiate  Institute.  Liverpool.  With  an  Introduction  by  Matthew 
Simtsox,  D.  D.,  Bishop  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church.  Two  volumes  in 
one,  unabridged.  Sold  by  subscription.  Svo.,  pp.  556.  New  York:  KB.  Treat  & 
Co.'   Chicago  :  C.  V.  Lilley.     Philadelphia :  A.  H.  Hubbard.     1869. 

Our  ministry  and  well-read  laity  will  be  gratified  to  learn  that  a 
new  edition  of  Conybeare  and  Howson  has  been  published,  and 
is  afforded  at  the  very  low  price  of  three  dollars.  It  is  to.be  spe- 
cially noted  that  it  is  not  abridged,  as  is  another  issne  of  the  same 
work  called  "The  People's  Edition."  Not  a  line  nor  an  engrav- 
ing in  the  original  work  is  omitted  from  tins.  The  interest  ofthe 
work  will  be  enhanced  by  (he  commendatory,  but  not  too  com- 
mendatory in!  reduction  by  Bishop  Simpson.  It  would  be  super*  r- 
ogation  for  us  to  give  a  favorable  opinion  of  a  work  which  has 
for  years  been  a  standard,  unique  in  its  kind.  It  is  one  of  the 
books  which  should  be  both  in  the  library  and  in  the  hands  of 
every  minister  and  every  thoughtful  Christian  layman. 


1869.]  Quarterly  Boole -Table.  317 

General  Literature. 

Tut  Poetical  Works  of  Charles  G.  Halpine,  (-Miles  O'Reilly,)  with  a  Biographical 
Sketch  and  Explanatory  Notes.  Edited  by  Robert  B.  Rooskvelt.  Red  aud 
gilt,  12mo.,  pp.  o32.     New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers.     1SG9. 

General  Halpine  was  born  in  Ireland  in  ]829,  emigrated  to  this 
country  in  early  manhood,  and  became  in  time  associate  Editor 
of  the  New  York  Times.  He  was  the  author  of  that  celebrated 
apostrophe  to  the  American  Flag,  prompted  by  the  capture  in 
Boston  of  the  fugitive  Anthony  Burns,  beginning  with 
"Tear  down  that  flaunting  lie." 

When  the  civil  war  commenced  he  offered  his  services  to  the 
country  and  won  high  honors.  When  the  Citizens'  Association 
was  formed  to  stem  the  torrent  of  political  and  civic  corruption 
in  our  metropolis  he  became  editor  of  their  organ,  The  Citizen, 
and  assailed  the  enemies  of  public  purity  and  order  with  a  brill- 
iaucy  and  vigor  seldom  surpassed  in  American  journalism.  He 
was  a  man  of  heroic  impulses,  fascinating  manner.?,  and  exhibited 
a  genius  not  equal,  yet  akin  to  that  of  an  Emnielt,  a  Curran,  or 
a  Moore. 

The  poems,  though  they  do  not  place  him  among  "  the  few,  the 
immortal  names,"  ore  not  merely  routine  versification,  but  the 
fresh  jets  of  a  true  poetic  nature  provoked  by  special  occa- 
sions and  contemporary  characters.  They  are  full  of  irregular 
but  brilliant  flashes  of  poetic  fire.  Political  banter  or  invective, 
amatory  effusions,  military  odes,  and  one  sacred  poem,  constitute 
the  body  of  the  volume.  We  should  have  supposed,  from  his 
indignant  flout  at  the  Boston  outrage,  that  he  would  have  stood 
forth  in  the  forefront  of  the  champions  of  freedom.  Yet  with  a 
heart  that  seemed  to  thirst  for  liberty  and  purity,  he  was  inex- 
tricably connected  with  the  party  of  slavery  and  corruption 
through  his  whole  career.  Many  of  his  poetical  shafts  are  aimed 
at  men  truer  to  freedom  and  humanity  than  himself;  yet  so  vig- 
orous and  effective  were  his  onslaughts  upon  the  corruptionists 
of  his  own  vile  taction  that  his  accidental  death,  in  the  bloom 
of  heroic  life,  was  no  ordinary  public  loss. 


r'<e  Poetical   Works  of  Alexander  Pope.     Edited  by  Rev.  II.  F.  C.vuy,  M.  A.     A 

new  edition,  carefully  revised.     Green  and  (jold,  12mo.,  pp.  -185.     New  York : 

D.  Appleton  &  Co.    1869. 
The  Jerusalem  Delivered  of  lorqvato  Thsso.     Translated  into  English  Spenserian 

Verse,  with  a  Life  of  the  Author,   by  J.  It.  Wim:N.     12moM  pp.   62,   paper 

cover.    New  York :  D.  Appleton  &  Co.     LS67. 
1  bese  two  volumes  are  specimens  of  a  series  of  standard  poets  in 
l  wo  styles,  and  at  two  very  reasonable  rates  of  price.     The  series 


31S  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

embraces  among  others  Scott,  Burns,  Cowper,  Campbell,  Chaucer, 
Spenser,  and  Uemans. 

Pope  forever  stands  as  one.  of  the  greatest  names  in  English 
poetiy,  whose  genius  cheated  an  era  in  English  versification. 
After  Shakspeare,  perhaps  there  is  no  poet  so  many  of  whose 
line?  have  attained  the  position  of  proverbs  in  public  thought. 

Tasso,  the  immortal  bard  of  medieval  Christianity  and  chiv- 
alry, finds  a  worthy  expositor  in  "Witfeu.  This  translation  is,  as 
it  stands,  iu  English  a  grand  heroic  song,  possessing  all  the  free- 
dom, melodv,  freshness,  and  boldness  of  a  true  original. 


Periodicals. 

The  Galaxy,  Vol.  YII.  No.  III.     Art.  III.     Is  Being  Done.     By  Richard  Grant 

"White. 

The  antiquarian  investigator  of  a  living  language  is  engaged  in 
a  fascinating  pursuit,  and  may  perform  a  valuable  office.  He 
wisely  and  usefully  interposes  a  check,  justified  by  his  learning 
and  authority,  upon  the  incorporation  of  anomalous,  ambiguous, 
inadequate,  or  degrading  linguistic  forms  into  a  living  language. 
But  ho  may  also  pervert  his  office  to  the  most  injurious  results. 
His  very  enthusiasm  for  the  old,  honorable  and  refined  as  it  may 
be,  mav  be  the  very  inspirer  of  this  perversion.  A  living  lan- 
guage ousrht  to  be  the  most  perfect  practicable  instrument  for 
expressing  thought.  Even  after  its  written  literature  is  formed, 
difficult  as  the  task  must  be.  it  rightly  aspires  to  increased  exact- 
ness, force,  and  beauty.  Now  it  is  the  very  tendency  of  the 
enthusiastic  student  of  the  old  to  sacrifice  the  natural  self  improve- 
ment of  the  language,  as  a  perfect  instrument  of  thought,  to  its 
historical  connection  with  outgrown,  defective,  and  even  instinc- 
tivelv  rejected  forms.  When  a  language  is  spontaneously  yet 
slowly  regenerating  itself  in  any  particular — when  it  is  sloughing 
off  some  antiquated,  clumsy,  ambiguous,  inadequate  form  of  ex- 
pression— and  assuming  a  new,  more  adequate  and  exact  one,  the 
philologist,  who  stands  by  and  attempts  to  repress  the  process, 
is  a  pervert  and  a  nuisance. 

With  all  respect  for  the  linguistic  enthusiasm  and  real  erudi- 
tion of  Mr.  Richard  Grant  White,  we  think  that  in  the  article  in 
The  .Galaxy  quoted  at  the  head  of  this  notice  he  has  very  une- 
quivocally committed  the  error  we  reprobate.  Such  phrases  as 
the  ho'tse  is  building,  the  dinner  is  eating,  the  sermon  is  preach- 
■iny,  ought,  in  spite  of  all  his  reasoning,  to  be  expelled  the  Ian- 


1SC9.1  Quarterly  Book-Table.  319 

fraage,  as  being  the  uncouth  result  of  a  historical  connection  with 
older  uncouth  forms  long-  since  rejected  by  the  public  instinct. 
T<>  re-establish  that  obsolete  connection,  to  retain  the  anomalous 
forms,  and  to  reject  the  later  and  exacter  forms,  is  to  insist  on  the 
degradation  and  not  the  ennoblement  of  the  language. 

Among  the  rights  which  the  speaking  public  of  a  living  lan- 
guage should  firmly  maintain  against  the  pedantry  of  philological 
specialists  is,  that  of  tilling  the  blank  places  in  the  language  with 
adequate  terms  and  formulae.  The  school  pedants  of  the  last  gen- 
eration (like  Campbell  in  his  Philosophy  of  Rhetoric)  gave  us 
formal  rules  to  control  the  adoption  of  new  words  into  the  lan- 
guage ;  assigning,  if  we  rightly  recollect,  three  generations  as  the 
noviciate  of  the  verbal  candidate.  The  common  sense  of  the 
present  day  laughs  at  such  effeminacy.  A  good  new  word,  like 
any  other  good  thing,  is  worthy  of  an  instantaneous  adoption  if 
we  need  or  desire  to  adopt  it ;  a  bad  new  word,  or  a  bad  word 
twenty  centuries  old,  should  be  as  promptly  rejected.  The  ques- 
tion of  the  age  of  the  word  is  very  unimportant.  The  main  query 
i?  as  to  its  adequacy  to  fill  a  blank  spot,  or  its  life  and  power  in 
expressing  a  new  shade  of  tbailght  or  a  fresh-born  idea.  TTe 
used  in  our  young  days  to  smile  at  our  old  professor,  who  told  us 
that  if  Addison  were  alive  he  woiild  not  understand  our  neolo- 
gism. We  say  now,  as  in  effect  we  said  then,  we  "supposed 
that  Addison  was  dead."  If  any  body  is  writing  for  Addison's 
understanding  or  approval,  let  him  go  to  Hades  and  write  for 
Addison's  eye;  not  plague  the  light  of  day  with  his  puerile 
ultra  conservatism.  What  would  Addison  understand  of  the 
discussions  of  a  modern  scientific,  or  political,  or  even  metaphys- 
ical discussion  ?  Open  the  pages  of  a  scientific  annual,  and  see 
what  entire  vocabularies,  nay,  we  may  say,  what  entire  new  lan- 
guages have  arisen  within  the  boundaries  of  our  English.  Neither 
the  living  age  nor  the  living  language  consents  to  be  swathed 
in  the  winding-sheets  of  the  past  generation. 

In  defending  his  rejection  of  the  new  formulae  in  question,  Mr. 
White  shows  that  there  was  an  old  form  of  verbs,  such  as  a-mah- 
tyti  a-going,  a-building,  in  which  the  a  was  a  contraction  of  in 
or  on,  and  the  word  ending  in  ing  was  truly  a  gerund  or  verbal 
noun.  To  say  The  house  is  a-building^  therefore,  was  equivalent 
to  saying  that  the  house  is  iu  process  of  building.  But  by  a  sub- 
sequent dropping  of  the  customary  a  the  phrase  The  /muse  is 
building  was  left;  and  in  this  phrase,  too,  he  infers  that  building 
W  a  verbal  noun  expressing  the  process,  and  so  the  phrase  is  the 
legitimate  one.     We  reply, 


820  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April, 

The  old  forms  ((-building,  a-going,  and  the  like,  like  thou- 
sands of  other  forms,  became  obsolete,  and  were  sloughed  oil" 
because  they  were  ambiguous,  and  inadequately  expressed  the 
intended  idea.  They  could  be  active  or  passive ;  could  mean  that 
the  builder  was  building  a  bouse,  or  that  the  house  was  being 
built ;  and,  by  natural  instinct,  impatient  of  a  form  which  had  lost 
the  power  of  making  clear  the  thought,  the  remnant  of  the  old 
formula  was  rejected  and  sunk  into  vulgarism.  When  the  prefix 
a  was  lost  the  popular  intention  gave  to  the  form  in  ing  the 
meaning  of  an  active  participle,  and  that  meaning  made  it  an 
active  participle.  But  thereby  a  blank  was  left  and  a  want  was 
felt.  There  was  now  no  way  in  the  entire  English  language  of 
concisely  aud  conveniently  expressing  the  process  of  receiving  an 
action.  By  the  same  wise  linguistic  instinct  more  than  fifty  years 
ago  the  precise  formula  by  which  that  process  could  be  expressed 
arose  :  The  house  is  being  built;  The  thing  is  being  done.  By  all 
who  prefer  that  the  form  of  expression  should  accurately  represent 
the  form  of  thought,  it  has  been  adopted.  By  conservative  lovers 
of  even  clumsy  obsoletisms  it  has  been  rejected,  merely  because 
it  is  new,  aud  so  is  still  challenged.  Had  there  been  no  philolo- 
gers  or  written  language,  and  had  the  public  mind  been  left  to 
its  own  healthy  unconscious  spontaneities,  this  formula  would 
have  long  ago  become  a  component  part  of  our  language  among 
intelligent  speakers,  and  the  old  forms  would  have  been  relegated 
to  the  "  Cape  Cod  fisherman." 

Mr.  White's  attempt  at  showing  that  the  forms  the  house  is 
being  built,  or  is  being  done,  are  philosophically  incorrect,  is  a 
signal  failure : 

To  be  and  to  exist  are  perfect  synonymes,  or  more  nearly  perfect,  perhaps,  than 
any  two  verbs  in  the  language.  In  some  of  their  meanings  there  is  a  shade  of  dif- 
ference but  in  others  there  is  none  whatever;  and  the  latter  are  those  which  servo 
our  present  purpose.  When  we  say.  He  being  forewarned  of  danger  lied,  we  say, 
He  existing  forewarned  of  danger  fled.  When  we  say  that  a  tiling  is  done,  we 
Fay  that  it  exists  done.  When  we  say.  That  being  done  I  shall  be  satisfied,  we  say, 
That  existing  done  I  shall  be  satisfied.  Is  bcimj  done,  is  simply  exists  existing 
done. 

The  verb  is,  as  a  copula  between  a  subject  and  predicate,  we 
reply,  is  no  synonym  with  the  verb  exist.  It  does  not  affirm  the 
existence  of  either  subject  or  predicate.  It  is  simply  the  sign  of 
connection;  the  coupler;  directing  the  reader  to  think  subject 
and  predicate  in  unity.  When  we  say  Tb>  griffin  is  an  imagin- 
ary animal i  we  do  not  affirm  that  the  griffin  exists.  Saying  the 
dodo  is  extinct,  is  not  saying  that  (la-  dod<>  exists  extinct ;  for  that 
would  be  a  contradiction.     Saying  The  souls  of  brutes  are  being 


1869J  Quarterly  Book-Table.  321 

annihilated,  is  not  saying,  The  souls  of  brutes  exist  existing  annihi- 
lated ;  for  the  former  is  sense  and  truth,  and  the  latter  is  contra- 
diction and  nonsense.  The  verb,  is  and  exists  have  here  little 
similarity  of  meaning.  The  true  analysis  of  such  expressions  we 
will  now  give. 

The  anvil  is  being  struck.  Here  sir  nek  denotes  the  simple 
recipience  or  undergoing  of  the  blow.  It  does  this  tunelessly  ; 
that  is,  irrespective  of  time;  for  in  the  passive  we  can  say  equally, 
]  am  struck,  I  was  struck,  I  will  be  struck.  Struck  is  the  note, 
therefore,  of  the  timeless  undergoing  of  the  blow.  The  word  being 
is  very  nearly  synonymous  with  continuing.  It  denotes  just  that 
sort  of  continuity  that  the  Greek  imperfect  does  in  contrast  with 
the  aorist.  The  aorist  is  struck,  the  imperfect  is  being  struck. 
Being  struck  implies  a  process,  a  continuity  of  some  sort  beyond 
:i  simple  instant.  Is  affirms  the  being  struck  of  the  anvil.  It  is 
the  copula  which  connects  the  predicate  with  the  subject ;  with 
the  superadded  idea  of  time  or  tense.  The  anvil  is  being  struck^ 
therefore,  expresses  the  idea  of  the  passive  process  of  the  anvil's 
undergoing  the  blow  with  the  most  perfect  grammatical  and  phil- 
osophical precision.  And  so  of  the  various  phrases,  The  house  is 
being  built,  The  criminal  is  being  tried,  etc.,  we  may  affirm  that 
they  are  as  exact  a  use  of  the  verb  to  express  the  intended  idea 
as  any  formula  in  language  can  be. 

Again,  of  the  active  participle  striking  (which  include:;  the 
same  idea  of  continuity  as  the  Greek  imperfect)  the  parallel 
passive  is  not  struck,  which  is  aoristic,  but  being  struck.  The  par- 
allel passive,  therefore,  of  the  phrase  John  is  striking  is  (not  John, 
is  struck,  but)  John  is  being  struck.  These  parallel  phrases 
express  the  active  and  passive  idea  with  equal  and  perfect  gram- 
matical and  philosophical  accuracy. 

Mr.  White  again  says  that  our  supposed  blunder  arises  from 
not  seeing  that  is  and  being  are  the  same  verb  ;  that  if  the  verb 
to  be  were  regular  in  form  we  would  never  have  fallen  into  the 
phrases  bes  being  built,  or  is  ising  built.  We  answer  that  the 
copula  is  and  the  participle  being  in  the  formulae  we  defend  are, 
as  we  have  above  shown,  different  in  sense.  We  nevertheless 
aflinn  that  if  the  verb  were  regular,  and  the  proper  copula  were 
&<-s,  then  the  phrase  bes  bang  built  would  he  perfectly  philosoph- 
ical and  should  be  adopted.  .7Ju'«g  built  would  then  express  the 
passive  process,  and  bes  would  connect  the  process  with  its  suh- 
jeet.  The  verbal  identity  of  bes  and  being  would  make  not  the 
•lightest  difference. 

-Mr.  White,  however,   heroically  affirms  that  he  would  use  all 


322  Methodist  Quarterly  Reviezo.  [April, 

the  phrases,  the  dinner  is  eating,  the  sermon  is  preaching,  the 
boy  is  whipping,  etc.,  and  asks  "Why  not?"  Because,  we  reply, 
the  phrases  in  the  ease  are  false  :  the  dinner  is  not  eating.  Eating 
is  an  active  and  not  a  passive  participle.  It  is  fastening  a  shame- 
ful poverty  on  the  English  language  to  compel  it  thus  clumsily  to 
use  the  same  term  for  both  the  active  and  passive  sense.  Because, 
also,  the  phrases  are  often  ludicrously  ambiguous.  Should  Mr. 
While  be  sitting  at  a  dinner  of  roast-pig,  and  commence  a  sen- 
tence with  W/rile  the  roast-pig  is  eating,  (as  if  the  roast  pig 
were  one  of  the  guests.)  the  young  ladies  near  him  would  in- 
dulge in  a  very  reasonable  titter  at  his  expense.  Should  he 
say  While  the  roast-pig  is  being  eaten,  they  might  think  him  a 
little  bookish,  but  they  would  not,  as  in  the  other  case,  think 
him  a  fool.  So  by  this  phraseology  the  guests  are  eating,  and 
the  dinner  is  eating ;  both  the  preacher  and  the  sermon  are 
preaching,  the  pedagogue  is  whipping  the  boy  and  the  boy  is 
whipping  too.  So  the  man  rides  the  horse  and  the  horse  rides 
the  man;  the  hammer  strikes  the  anvil  and  the  anvil  strikes  the 
hammer.  The  New  York  landlady  may  say  (correctly,  according 
to  White)  "I  not  only  sleep  my  boarders,  but  Teat  'em." 

While  thus  treating  the  subject  of  supplying  deficit  spots  in 
a  living  language,  we  may  note  that  there  is  in  the  English  lan- 
guage, if  we  rightly  understand,  one  most  singular  and  central 
blank.  We  have  no  one  word  to  egress  the  regular  coming  into 
existence  of  an  event.  The  words  to  happen,  to  occur,  include  the 
element  of  accident.  This  hiatus  we  awkwardly  patch  over  with 
phrases  at  which  the  mind  is  disgusted,  as,  to  come  to  pass,  to 
take  place.  Now  there  is  a  word  which  is  fresh  and  clear,  which 
is  not  very  irrevocably  appropriated  to  any  other  idea,  and  which 
by  popular  healthy  instinct  is  aspiring  to  occupy  the  blank  spot. 
The  word  is  transpire.  O  no  !  exclaim  the  effeminates,  thai  word 
must  not  designate  the  talcing  place  of  an  event ;  it  signifies  to 
become  known.  It  is  of  no  use  to  tell  these  imbeciles  thai  the  latter 
meaning  is  itself  little  known,  little  used,  and  little  needed,  while 
the  want  it  is  called  to  supply  is  a  startling  defect  in  the  entire 
language.  You  may  supply  reasons,  but  you  cannot  supply 
brains.  Your  only  method  is  to  use  the  needed  word  in  the 
needing  place,  and  leave  the  shrieking  pedant  to  his  spasms.* 

*The  following  sentence  is:  from  a  leading  London  newspaper,  discussing  ihe 
American  temper  toward  England:  "They  will  not  declare  war  on  us  because 
an  old  gentleman  of  Maryland,  who  lias  just  seen  brothers  cutting  each  other's 
throats,  chooses  to  keep  on  saying  that  cousinhood  is  an  indissoluble  bond  of 
amity."     Here,  1.  The  word  cousinhood  is  a  fresh  coinage,  so  perfectly  fitted  into 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book -Tabic.  323 

The  word  stand-point  was,  we  believe,  first  appropriated  from  the 
German  by  Professor  Moses  Stuart,  and  has  generally  been  adopted 
In  America  and  England  by  all  who  regard  the  fitness  of  a  term 
rather  than  its  age.  Purists  in  England,  embarrassed  by  its  adap- 
tation for  the  purpose,  yet  unwilling  to  accept  it,  sometimes  use 
the  phrase  "  standing  point,"  which  properly,  however,  signifies  a 
point,  that  stands,  in  contrast  with  a  moving  point.  The  word 
stand  in  the.  compound  is  a  noun,  signifying  position  or  the  act  of 
standing,  and  the  compound  word  itself  is  as  truly  legitimate  as 
the  term  inkstand. 

The  word  reliable  is  liable  to  no  other  valid  objection  titan 
its  novelty.  It  has  been,  indeed,  objected  that  as  we  say  rely  vpon, 
bo  the  preposition  needs  to  be  incorporated  with  the  verb  thus, 
reH-vpon-able.  But  though  we  say  a  man  must,  account  for  an  act, 
we  nevertheless  say  accountable  without  the  preposition ;  and 
though  Ave  say  attained  to  a  thing,  we  use  the  adjective  attainable. 
We  have  laughable,  from  laugh  at ;  and  that  the  adjective  is  not, 
as  some  think,  derived  from  the  noun  lough,  but  from  the  verb,  is 
clear  from  the  fact  that  laughable  is  synonymous  with  laitffh-at-able, 
ns  if  a  proper  contraction.  It  is  said,  however,  that  the  word 
(rusficorthy,  possessing  the  same  meaning,  renders  the  new  word 
unnecessary.  But.  trustworthy  is  a  very  homely  word ;  and  Mr. 
White  to  the  contrary  notwithstanding,  the  English  language  is 
so  utterly  homely  that  cultivated  homeliness  is  a  great  superero- 
gation. So  homely,  indeed,  is  our  native  Saxon,  that,  so  far  as 
language  is  concerned,  both  the  Roman  occupancy  and  the  Xor- 
man  conquest  were  crowning  mercies.  ZTntrustworthiness  is  a 
very  ugly  word ;  and  all  the  inflexions  of  trustworthy  are  ugly 
in  comparison  with  its  Latin  rival.  Besides,  the  adjective  worthy 
belongs  to  a  living  character  rather  than  to  a  thing  or  fact.  Thus, 
we  think  General  Grant  a  trustworthy  man,  and  shall  continue  so 
to  think  until  we  receive  reliable  proofs  to  the  contrary. 

the  sentence  as  to  tie  absolutely  necessary  to  its  force  and  point.  2.  The  writer 
would  justly  have  treated  the  womanish  remonstrances  of  any  literary  purist  with 
contemptuous  disregard.  3.  The  word,  nevertheless,  however  fitted  for  the  writer's 
Use,  is  scarcely  needed  in  the  language,  and  lie  himself  would  hardly  expect  it  ever 
to  bo  used  again.  Besides  that  loose  temporary  slang  which  degrades. our  con- 
temporaneous newspaper  and  conversational  style,  and  which  every  elevated 
lhif.kt.-r  repudiates,  there  are  temporary  verbal  formations,  dignified  and  analogical 
>"  their  character,  which  a  free  and  vigorous  writer  may  justifiably  use  without 
expecting  or  wishing  that  they  should  become  permanent  parts  of  the  language. 


324  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [April. 


Miscellaneous. 

Glen  Elder  Books. — The  Orphans  of  Glen  Elder,  Frances  Leslie,  The  Lyceum  Hoys. 
The  Harleys  of  Chelsea  Place,  Rosa  Lindesay.  Twenty  beautiful  Illustrations! 
New  York:  Carlton  &  Lanahan.     Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  &  "Walden. 

A  nice  paper  box  of  five  fresh   Sunday-school  volumes,  republi- 
cations from  abroad,  beautifully  written,  and  printed  and  bound 
in  most  attractive  style. 
27<e  Ring  and  the  Booh.     By  Robert  Bbownikg,  M.A.     Volume  II.     12mo.,  pp 

332.     Boston:  Field  &  Osgood.     1869. 
How  to  Read  Character.     A  new  illustrated  Handbook  of  Phrenology  and  Physi- 
ognomy for  Students  and  Examiners ;  with  a  Descriptive  Chart.     Red  and  gilt. 
12mo.,  pp.  192.     New  York:  Samuel  R.  Wells.     1869. 

A  very  neat  and  skillful  manual  for  the  purpose  of  making  every 

man  his  own  phrenologist. 

Seeds  and  Sheaves;  or,  Words  of  Scripture;  their  History  and  Fruits.  By  A.  C. 
Thomson-,  D.D.  12mo.,  pp.  323.  Boston:  Gould  and  Lincoln.  New  York: 
Sheldon  &  Co.     Cincinnati:  George  S.  Blanchard  &  Co.     1869. 

A  series  of  Scripture  topics  and  texts,   with  striking  anecdotal 

illustrations. 

Be/ore  the  Throne;-  or,  Daily  Devotions  for  a  Child.     24mo.,  pp.  123.     New  York: 

M.  W.  Dodd.     1869. 
The  Poacher.     By  Captain  MarrYATT.     12mo..    pp.  310.     New  York:  D.  Apple- 
ton  &  Co.     1869. 
The  Chaplet  of  Pearls :  or.  The  White  and  Black  Ribaumont.     By  the  Author  of 

"The  Heir  of  Redclyffe."     With  Illustrations.     12mo.,  pp.  331.     New  York  : 

D.  Apple-ton  &  Co.     1869. 
Christ  and  Him   Crucified.     A   Discourse  preached  in   the  Methodist   Episcopal 

Church,    Ypsilanti,    Michigan,    Sunday   Morning,    September    G,    1SC8,   on    the 

occasion  of  inaugurating  his  public  ministration.     By  Ret.  T.  C.  Gardner,  A.M. 

12mo.,  pp.  16.     0.  R.  Chase,  Ann  Arbor.  Mich. 
A   Believers   Hand-Book  for    Christians   of  Every  Name.     By  Rev.  E.  Davies,  of 

East  Maine  Conference.     12mo.,  pp.  12.     Published  by  the  Author. 
Ee  Knew  he  was  Right.     By  Ai'HOXY  TROLLOPE.      With  Illustrations  by  Marcus 

Stone.     12mo..  Paper  Cover,  pp  172.     New  York  :  Harper  £  Brothers.     18G9. 
Tlie  Low  of  Love  and  Love  as  a  Law;  or,  Moral  Science,  Theoretical  and  Practical. 

12mo.     Scribner  £  Co. 
Dr.  BeUows's  Travels  in  Eurcqie.     Volume  IT.     12mo.     Harper  &  Brothers. 


Notice  of  the  following  postponed  to  next  number  : 
Dr.  Peirce's  Half  Century  with  Juvenile  Delinquents.     Appleton  &  Co. 
Missionary  Report  for  1869.     Carlton  &  Lanahan. 
Pre-historic  Nations.     Harper  &  Brothers. 


Carlton  &  Lanahan  will  soon  issue  a  new  edition  of  Dr.  Fosteu's 
work  on  "  Christian  Purity,"  revised  by  the  author. 

Also  a  volume  of  Sermons,  Addresses,  etc.,  by  Dr.  Gii.r.v.i:; 
Ha  vex. 


M 


ETHODIST 

Quarterly  Eeview. 

JULY,    18  G9. 


Art.  I.— TESTS  OF  A  VALID  MINISTRY  AND  A  TRUE 
CHURCH. 

It  is  one  of  the  advantages  and  beauties  of  the  Methodist 
Episcopal  Church  that  there  is  nothing  in  her  religious 
faith,  or  education,  or  polity,  that  embarrasses  our  fellowship 
with  all  who  love  onr  Lord  Jesus  Christ  in  sincerity. 
We  can  commune  with  them,  work  with  them,  and  rejoice 
with  them  just  as  far  as  their  catholicity  will  permit.  General 
delight  in  the  Church  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ  is  not  incom- 
patible with  special  delight  in  a  particular  branch  of  that 
Church.  "We  may  love  a  large  circle  of  friends  very  sincerely 
and  earnestly,  and  yet  one  of  them  may  be  the  object  of  our 
special  regard  and  joy.  We  do  not  love  other  Churches  less 
because  we  love  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  more.  Nor 
in  asserting  the  validity  of  her  ministry  and  the  genuineness  of 
licr  Chnrchdom  are  we  obliged  to  invalidate  other  ministries,  or 
unchurch  other  denominations.  It  is  in  perfect  charity  toward 
others,  therefore,  that  we  assert  our  claim  to  be  a  true  Ministry 
and  Church  on  the  New  Testament  basis.  We  select  the 
Church  of  Corinth  as  a  precedent  for  our  argument. 

I.  The  Corinthian  Church  possessed  a  valid  ministry  because 
°i  its  divine  appointment.  They  claimed  this  in  words  like 
these  :  "  Paul,  called  to  be  an  Apostle  of  Jesus  Christ  through 
the  will  of  God."  1  Cor.  i,  1.  "Paul,  an  Apostle  of  Jesus 
Christ  by   the  will  of  God."    2  Cor.   i,  1.      "For  though  I 

Foukth  Sekies,  Vol.  XXL— 21 


326  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  [July, 

preach  the  Gospel,  I  have  nothing  to  glory  of:  for  necessity  is 
laid  upon  me ;  yea,  woe  is  unto  me,  if  I  preach  not  the  Gos- 
pel !  For  if  I  do  this  thing  willingly,  I  have  a  reward :  but 
if  against  my  will,  a  dispensation  of  the  Gospel  is  committed 
unto  me."  1  Cor.  ix,  16,  17.  "Who  also  hath  made  us  able 
ministers  of  the  New  Testament;  not  of  the  letter,  but  of  the 
spirit,"  "And  all  things  are  of  God,  who  hath  reconciled  us 
to  himself  by  Jesus  Christ,  and  hath  given  to  us  the  ministry 
of  reconciliation ;  to  wit,  that  God  was  in  Christ,  reconciling 
the  world  unto  himself,  not  imputing  their  trespasses  unto 
them;  and  hath  committed  unto  us  the  word  of  reconcilia- 
tion. Xow  then  we  are  embassadors  for  Christ,  as  though 
God  did  beseech  you  by  us :  we  pray  you  in  Christ's  stead, 
be  ye  reconciled  to  God."  2  Cor.  v,  18-20.  "  For  I  sup- 
pose I  was  not  a  whit  behind  the  very  chiefest  Apostles." 
2  Cor.  xi,  5. 

This  claim  to  divine  appointment  was  recognized  by  the 
Church.  "  Therefore,  seeing  we  have  this  ministry,  as  we  have 
received  mercy,  we  faint  not;  but  have  renounced  the  hidden 
things  of  dishonesty,  not  walking  in  craftiness,  nor  handling  the 
word  of  God  deceitfully ;  but,  by  manifestation  of  the  truth, 
commending  ourselves  to  every  man's  conscience  in  the  sight 
of  God."  2  Cor.  iv,  1,  2.  "  Knowing  therefore  the  terror  of  the 
Ford,  we  persuade  men  ;  but  we  are  made  manifest  unto  God  ; 
and  I  trust  also  are  made  manifest  in  your  consciences."  2  Cor. 
v,  11.  "  Truly  the  signs  of  an  Apostle  were  wrought  among 
you  in  all  patience,  in  signs,  and  wonders,  and  mighty  deeds." 
2  Cor.  xii,  12.  "We  have  been  thoroughly  made  manifest 
among  you  in  all  tilings."  2  Cor.  xi,  G. 

The  Methodist  Church  has  ever  held  that  no  man  taketh  this 
honor  to  himself;  that  no  man  can  enter  the  Christian  ministry 
merely  as  a  chosen  profession,  "but  ]ie  that  is  called  of  God, 
as  was  Aaron."  And  further,  that  when  a  man  is  moved  by 
the  Holy  Ghost  to  take  upon  him  the  office  of  the  ministry  in 
the  Church  of  Christ,  this  will  of  God  concerning  him  is  made 
manifest  to  the  Church.  In  the  exercise  of  his  gifts  in  the 
social  meetings  of  the  Church,  in  his  conversation  and  life,  there 
will  be  seen  by  the  Church  such  gifts  and  grace  and  usefulness 
as  carry  to  the  conscience  of  the  Church  the  conviction  that  he 
is  a  chosen  vessel  of  God  to  bear  his  name  before  mankind. 


1*0.]  -^  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  327 

Therefore  in  our  Church  this  question  is  always  submitted  to 
the  laity.  No  man  can- be  licensed  to  preach  among  us  who  is 
not  recommended  by  the  Society  or  Leaders'  Meeting  where  he 
belongs.  Then  the  Quarterly  Conference,  (composed  mostly 
of  laymen,)  after  due  examination,  may  license  him  to  preach. 
And  if  he  seeks  to  be  a  Pastor  he  must  be  further  recommended 
l>v  the  Quarterly  Conference  to  the  Annual  Conference  as  a 
suitable  person  for  that  office  and  work.  So  that  in  the  case  of 
each  one  of  the  more  than  eight  thousand  Pastors  in  the  Meth- 
odist Episcopal  Church  the  laity  have  three  times  formally  and 
officially  expressed  the  judgment  that  they  were  called  of  God 
to  this  function  and  ministry.  Then  after  years  of  trial  and 
repeated  examinations  they  have  been  ordained  by  the  authority 
of  their  ministerial  brethren. 

We  do  not  deny  that  a  brother  may  be  mistaken  as  to  a  call 
to  the  ministry.  We  do  not  claim  that  the  judgment  of  the 
Church  is  infallible  in  this  matter.  But  we  do  believe  that 
when  a  man  professes  to  be  called  of  God  to  this  holy  ministry 
whose  Christian  character  is  a  guarantee  of  his  sincerity,  and 
the  Church  finds  in  him  the  gifts,  grace,  and  fruit  which  a 
true  minister  must  have,  they  can  decide  the  question  more 
certainly  and  safely  than  any  other  persons  or  authorities.  So 
that  the  ministry  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  do  not 
hail  from  John  the  Baptist,  or  from  Peter,  or  from  John 
V\  esley.  We  seek  no  investiture  from  prelate  or  primate. 
"\\  e  have  succeeded  to  no  dead  men's  places ;  we  derive 
authority  from  no  dead  men's  credentials;  there  is* no  smell 
of  the  sepulcher  about  us;  our  call  is  direct  from  our  risen 
and  living  Lord,  recognised  and  authenticated  ly  a  living 
Church,  made  valid  and  vital  ly  the  living  God.  We  are  the 
living  -ministers  of  to-day  by  divine  appointment. 

II.  Another  cause  of  this  Church's  rejoicing  in  the  validity 
of  her  ministry  was  their  endowments.  "  But  God  hath  revealed 
them  unto  us  by  his  Spirit:  for  the  Spirit  searcheth  all  things, 
yea,  the  deep  things  of  God.  For  what  man  knowelh  the 
things  of  a  man,  save  the  spirit  of  man  which  is  in  him  >.  even 
"0  the  things  of  God  knowcth  no  man,  but  the  Spirit  of  God. 
fcow  we  have  received,  not  the  spirit  of  the  world,  but  the 
Spirit  which  is  of  God;  that  we  might  know  the  things  that 
we  freely  given  to  us  of  God.     Which  things  also  we  speak, 


32S  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  [July, 

not  in  the  words  which  man's  wisdom  teacheth,  but  which 
tho  lloly  Ghost  teacheth;  comparing  spiritual  things  with 
spiritual."  1  Cor.  ii,  10-13.  These  Scriptures  state  their 
spiritual  perception  and  heavenly  wisdom;  their  knowledge 
of  divine  things. 

"  For  God,  who  commanded  the  light  to  shine  out  of  dark- 
ness, hath  shined  in  our  hearts,  to  give  the  light  of  the  knowl- 
edge of  the  glory  of  God  in  the  face  of  Jesus  Christ.  But  we 
have  this  treasure  in  earthen  vessels,  that  the  excellency  of  the 
power  may  be  of  God,  and  not  of  us."  2  Cor.  iv,  G,  7.  As 
earthen  vessels  merely  they  were  intrusted  with  the  treasure  of 
Christianity.  "But  though  I  be  rude  in  speech,  yet  not  in 
knowledge."  2  Cor.  xi,  G.  "  And  my  speech  and  my  preach- 
ing was  not  with  enticing  words  of  man's  wisdom,  but  in  dem- 
onstration of  the  Spirit  and  of  power."  1  Cor.  ii,  4.  "  Not 
that  we  are  sufficient  of  ourselves  to  think  any  thing  as  of  our- 
selves ;  but  our  sufficiency  is  of  God."  2  Cor.  iii,  5.  These 
passages  prove  that  God.  having  called  these  Apostles,  so  illu- 
mined their  minds,  so  endued  them  with  the  wisdom  that  is 
from  above,  and  so  assisted  them  with  the  demonstration  of  the 
Spirit,  as  to  make  them  sufficient  for  their  office*  and  work.  In 
licensing  and  recommending  her  ministers  the  Methodist  Church 
has  expressed  the  judgment  that  by  similar  endowments  from 
God  they  possessed  the  same  ministerial  sufficiency. 

III.  A  third  cause  of  rejoicing  in  their  ministers  was  their 
devotedness  in  the  office.  "'For  I  determined  not  to  know 
any  thing  among  you,  save  Jesus  Christ,  and  him  crucified." 

1  Cor.  ii,  2.  "  For  we  preach  not  ourselves,  but  Christ  Jesus  the 
Lord  ;  and  ourselves  your  servants  [or  slaves]  for  Jesus'  sake." 

2  Cor.  iv.  5.  "  And  I  will  very  gladly  spend  and  be  spent  for 
you;  though  the  more  abundantly  I  love  you,  the  less  1  be 
loved."  2  Cor.  xii,  15.  Xot  to  secure  their  love  or  their  bless- 
ings, but  to  save  their  precious  souls,  he  would  sacrifice  himself. 

This  devotedness  cost  much  suffering.  "  For  I  think  that 
God  hatli  set  forth  us  the  Apostles  last,  as  it  were  appointed  to 
death :  for  we  are  made  a  spectacle  unto  the  world,  and  to 
angels,  and  to  men.  .  .  .  Even  unto  this  present  hour  we  both 
hunger,  and  thirst,  and  are  naked,  and  arc  buffeted,  and  have 
no  certain  dwelling-place ;  and  labor,  working  with  our  own 
hands :  being  reviled,  we  bless ;  being  persecuted,  we  suffer  it." 


1SG9.]  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  329 

1  Cor.  iv,  9,  11, 12.  "  Are  they  ministers  of  Christ  ?  (I  speak 
«3  a  fool,)  I  am  more;  in  labors  more  abundant,  in  stripes 
above  measure,  in  prisons  more  frequent,  in  deaths  oft.  Of  the 
Jews  five  times  received  I  forty  stripes  save  one.     Tin-ice  was 

1  beaten  with  rods,  once  was  I  stoned,  thrice  I  Buffered  ship- 
wreck, a  night  and  a  day  I  have  been  in  the  deep ;  in  journey- 
ings  often,  in  perils  of  waters,  in  perils  of  robbers,  in  perils  by 
mine  own  countrymen,  in  perils  by  the  heathen,  in  perils  in 
the  city,  in  perils  in  the  wilderness,  in  perils  in  the  sea,  in 
perils  among  false  brethren ;  in  weariness  and  painfullness,  in 
watchings  often,  in  hunger  and  thirst,  in  fastings  often,  in  cold 
and  nakedness.  Besides  those  things  that  are  without,  that 
which  cometh  upon  me  daily,  the  care  of  all  the  Churches." 

2  Cor.  xi,  23-28. 

We  submit  whether  these  quotations  are  not  historically  de- 
scriptive of  the  ministry  of  the  Methodist  Church  ?  Have  they 
not  generally  been  absorbed  in  the  work  of  their  ministry? 
Have  not  their  lives  been  those  of  sacrifice  and  suffering?  Is 
it.  not  literally  true  that  they  have  no  certain  dwelling-place? 
Have  they  not  often  been  compelled  to  labor,  working  with 
their  own  hands  to  obtain  bread  for  themselves  and  families? 
Certainly  they  have  been  in  journeyings  often,  and  in  perils  in 
all  the  forms  here  spoken  of,  and  have  endured  all  the  suffer- 
ings here  described.  Even  in  recent  times  in  fulfilling  this 
ministry,  some  have  suffered  actual  martyrdom.  Certainly 
more  heroic  devotion,  more  patient  endurance,  and  more  ear- 
nest labor  have  not  been  displayed  by  any  ministry  since  the 
example  of  inspired  Apostles.  Well  may  the  Church  which 
has  such  a  ministry  rejoice  in  it. 

IV.  A  fourth  cause  of  rejoicing  was  found  in  their  manner 
of  executing  their  ministry.  "  For  the  love  of  Christ  constrain- 
eth  us;  because  we  thus  judge,  that  if  one  died  for  all,  then 
were  all  dead."  2  Cor.  v,  1-1.  "I  speak  not  tbis  to  condemn 
you:  for  I  have  said  before,  that  ye  are  in  our  hearts  to  die 
find  live  with  you."  2  Cor.  vii,  3.  "  For  out  of  much  affliction 
and  anguish  of  heart  I  wrote  unto  3011  with  many  tears;  not 
that  ye  should  be  grieved,  but  that  ye  might  know  the  love 
which  I  have  more  abundantly  unto  you."  2  Cor.  ii,  4.  "  For 
I  am  jealous  over  you  with  godly  jealousy  :  for  I  have  espoused 
)'ou  to  one  husband,  that  I  may  present  you  as  a  chaste  virgin 


330  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  [July, 

to  Christ."  2  Cor.  xi,  2.  What  an  affectionate,  careful  pastor- 
ate is  described  in  these  passages !  Indeed,  the  tone  of  both 
these  epistles  is  sympathetic,  loving,  and  paternal.  They  show 
the  most  prayerful  solicitude,  the  most  watchful  care  on  the 
part  of  these  Pastors.  "Fed  you  with  milk!"  Our  care 
for  you  in  the  sight  of  God  !  Daily  care  of  all  the  Churches ! 
"Blessed  be  God,  even  the  Father  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ, 
the  Father  of  mercies,  and  the  God  of  all  comfort ;  who  com- 
forteth  us  in  all  our  tribulation,  that  we  may  be  able  to  comfort 
them  which  are  in  any  trouble,  by  the  comfort  wherewith  we 
ourselves  are  comforted  of  God."  2  Cor.  i,  3,  -i.  I  feel  assured 
that  the  sentiment  of  the  Church  will  approve  the  statement 
that  the  ministry  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  has  very 
generally,  in  this  respect,  been  like  that  of  the  Apostles. 
Human  infirmity  has  doubtless  made  exceptions  among  them, 
but  the  spirit  of  Christ  has  usually  possessed  and  controlled  his 
servants  in  an  eminent  degree;  even  in  apostolic  measure. 

V.  A  fifth  cause  of  rejoicing  was,  the  doctrines  they  preached. 
"  But.  we  preach  Christ  crucified,  unto  the  Jews  a  stumbling- 
block,  and  unto  the  Greeks  foolishness ;  but.  unto  them  which 
are  called,  both  Jews  and  Greeks,  Christ  the  power  of  God,  and 
the  wisdom  of  God."  1  Cor.  i,  23,  24.  "  For  I  delivered  unto 
you  first  of  all  that  which  I  also  received,  how  that  Christ  died 
for  our  sins  according  to  the  Scriptures:  and  that  he  was 
buried,  and  that  he  rose  again  the  third  day  according  to  the 
Scriptures."  1  Cor.  xv,  3,  4.  "For  other  foundation  can  no 
man  lay  than  that  is  laid,  which  is  Jesus  Christ."  1  Cor.  iii,  11. 
Certainly  these  were  glad  tidings  of  great  joy. 

They  also  preached  a  present,  full,  and  conscious  salvation: 
"Therefore  if  any  man  be  in  Christ,  he  is  a  new  creature:  old 
things  are  passed  away ;  behold,  all  things  are  become  new." 
2  Cor.  v,  17.  "  Know  ye  not  that  ye  are  the  temple  of  God, 
and  that  the  Spirit  of  God  dwellcth  in  you?"  1  Cor.  iii,  1G. 
"Having  therefore  these  promises,  dearly  beloved,  let  us 
cleanse  ourselves  from  all  filthiness  of  the  flesh  and  spirit,  per- 
fecting holiness  in  the  fear  of  God."  2  Cor.  vii,  1.  4'  For  we 
know  that,  if  our  earthly  house  of  this  tabernacle  were  dissolved, 
we  have  a  building  of  God,  a  house  not  made  with  hands,  eter- 
nal in  the  heavens."  2  Cor.  v,  1.  "  Knowing  that  he  which 
raised  up  the  Lord  Jesus  shall  raise  up  us  also  by  Jesus,  and 


1869.]  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  331 

6hall  present  us  with  you."  2  Cor.  iv,  14.  How  rich,  full,  and 
positive  is  this  experience !  A  new  creature  !  The  Spirit  of 
God  dwelling  in  us!  Perfecting  holiness  in  the  fear  of  God! 
Knowing  that  we  have  an  inheritance  in  heaven,  and  that 
Jesus  is  our  resurrection  and  life  ! 

They  also  set  forth  the  conditions  of  this  great  salvation: 
"For  godly  sorrow  worketh  repentance  to  salvation  not  to  be 
repented  of."  2  Cor.  vii,  10.  "It  pleased  God  by  the  foolish- 
ness of  preaching  to  save  them  that  believe."  1  Cor.  i,  21.  No 
attendant  upon  the  ministry  of  the  Methodist  Church  will 
deny  that  these  are  the  fundamental  doctrines  of  her  pulpits. 
Christ  crucified ;  Christ  the  Redeemer,  Mediator,  and  Saviour. 
Made  unto  us  wisdom,  righteousness,  sanctification,  and  re- 
demption— all  in  all.     Joy-inspiring  doctrines ! 

VI.  Another  cause  of  rejoicing  was  found  in  the  success  of 
their  ministry.  The  planting  of  the  Corinthian  Church  was  a 
proof  of  their  great  success.  TVe  make  one  quotation  on  this 
point  as  all-sufficient  for  our  purpose:  "Now  thanks  be  unto 
God,  which  always  causeth  us  to  triumph  in  Christ,  and  makcth 
manifest  the  savor  of  his  knowledge  by  us  in  every  place." 
2  Cor.  ii,  14.  This  has  been  as  literally  true  with  the  Meth- 
odist ministry  as  it  was  with  the  Apostles.  "When  and  where 
have  they  failed  of  success?  Not  in  England,  Ireland,  Scot- 
land, or  Wales ;  not  in  the  United  States  or  Territories ;  not  in 
our  cities,  or  villages,  or  older  rural  districts.  Certainly  Christ 
has  made  manifest  the  savor  of  his  knowledge  by  us  in  the 
newer  portions  of  our  country.  What  class  of  people  have  we 
failed  to  benefit!  Not  the  slaves  or  freedmen  of  the  South; 
not  the  red  men  of  the  wilderness ;  not  the  immigrant  popula- 
tion of  the  country  ;  not  the  poor  ;  not  the  rich  ;  not  the  ignor- 
ant; not  the  learned.  Among  them  all  God  has  made  known 
by  us  the  savor  of  his  resurrection.  "We  have  triumphed  in 
Christ  in  Africa,  in  China,  in  India,  in  Germany,  in  Scandi- 
navia.    Methodism  is  becoming  as  polyglot  tic  as  the  race. 

Such  were  the  Apostles;  such  are  we.  A  divinely  called,  a 
spiritually  endowed,  a  devoted,  living  ministry,  preaching  the 
glorious  doctrines  of  the  Gospel  with  success  all  the  while  and 
in  every  place. 

The  ministry  of  the  Church  had  equal  cause  for  rejoicing  in 
their  people  as  a  true  Church  of  Jesus  Christ. 


332  A  Valid  Ministry  and  Tmie  Church.  [July, 

I.  First.  As  the  fruit  and  proof  of  apostleship  :  "  For  though 
ye.  have  ten  thousand  instructors  in  Christ,  yet  have  ye  not 
many  fathers :  for  in  Christ  Jesus  I  have  begotten  you  through 
the  Gospel."  1  Cor.  iv,  15.  "  Therefore  whether  it  were  I  or 
they,  so  we  preach,  and  so  ye  believed."  1  Cor.  xv,  11.  "Who 
then  is  Paul,  and  who  is  Apollos,  bnt  ministers  by  whom  ye 
believed,  even  as  the  Lord  gave  to  every  man  ?"  1  Cor.  iii,  5. 
"  If  I  be  not  an  Apostle  nnto  others,  yet  doubtless  I  am  to  you : 
for  the  seal  of  mine  apostleship  arc  ye  in  the  Lord."  1  Cor. 
ix,  2.  "  Do  we  begin  again  to  commend  ourselves  ?  or  need 
we,  as  some  others,  epistles  of  commendation  to  you,  or  letters 
of  commendation  from  you?  Ye  are  our  epistle,  written  in 
our  hearts,  known  and  read  of  all  men.  Forasmuch  as  ye  are 
manifestly  declared  to  be  the  epistle  of  Christ,  ministered  by 
us,  written  not  with  ink,  hut  with  the  Spirit  of  the  living  God ; 
not  in  tables  of  stone,  but  in  fleshy  tables  of  the  heart,"  2  Cor. 
iii,  1-3. 

It  was  a  devout  joy  to  the  Apostle  that  as  he  planted  and 
Apollos  watered  God  gave  the  increase.  That  working  to- 
gether with  God  they  had  been  successful  Pastors.  Their 
labor  had  not  been  in  vain  in  the  Lord.  Souls  had  been  led  to 
repentance;  to  faith  in  Christ;  made  new  creatures  in  Christ; 
saved.  No  success  gives  greater  joy  than  ministerial  success. 
On  this  principle  no  ministry  has  more  cause  for  joy  than 
Methodist  ministers. 

Second.  Again  the  Apostle  claims  this  success  as  the  proof 
of  his  apostleship,  "The  seal  of  mine  apostleship  are  ye  in  the 
Lord."  He  admits  that  some  others  needed,  as  there  are  cer- 
tainly some  who  do  at  this  day,  epistles  or  letters  of  commenda- 
tion, but  they  needed  none.  "Forasmuch  as  ye  arc  manifestly 
declared  to  be  the  epistle  of  Christ,  written  not  with  ink,  but 
with  the  Spirit  of  the  living  God."  How  richly  is  this  the  ex- 
perience of  nearly  every  Methodist  minister!  IIow  joyously 
can  we  point  to  those  we  have  led  to  Christ  and  say,  Ye  are 
our  epistle ;  ye  are  the  seal  of  our  apostleship  !  And  surely  we 
need  give  no  other  proof  of  Christ,  speaking  in  us.  Ministers 
who  can  evcry-wheru  furnish  credentials  written  not  with  ink, 
but,  with  the  Spirit  of  the  living  God,  need  no  others.  Men 
who  will  not  accept  God's  authentication  are  not  entitled  to 
any  other  evidence. 


1600.3  -4  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  333 

Third.  This  principle  is  laid  down  by  a  still  higher  authority. 
When  John  sent  two  of  his  disciples  to  Jesus  to  inquire,  "  Art 
thou  he  that  should  come,  or  look  we  for  another?"  Jesus 
wid  unto  them,  "Go  and  show  John  again  those  things  which 
ye  do  hear  and  see.  The  blind  receive  their  sight,  and  the 
lame  walk,  the  lepers  are  cleansed,  and  the  deaf  hear,  the  dead 
'are  raised  up,  and  the  poor  have  the  Gospel  preached  to  them.'' 
(Here  Jesus  rests  the  proof  of  his  Messiahship  on  his  works. 
iTiiese  being  such  as  belong  to  that  office,  prove  that  he  who 
performs  them  is  that  person.  If  our  Divine  Master  could  rest 
the  question]  of  his  Messiahship  on  the  demonstration  of  appro- 
priate works,  then  certainly  the  Apostles  could  rest  the  question 
of  their  embassadorship  upon  that  test.  If  the  Apostles  could 
rest  the  question  of  their  apostleship  upon  the  legitimate  re- 
sults of  that  office  attaching  to  their  ministrations,  then  we 
can  rest  the  validity  of  our  embassadorship  with  equal  confi- 
dence upon  the  same  results.  Indeed,  reason  and  Scripture 
and  the  divine  example  do  not  permit  us  to  ask  or  offer  any 
other  proof  of  our  divine  mission  and  work. 

II.  They  rejoiced  in  the  fellowship  of  their  spiritual  experi- 
ence :  "  For  by  one  Spirit  are  we  all  baptized  into  one  body, 
whether  we  be  Jews  or  Gentiles,  whether  we  be  bond  or  free ; 
and  have  been  all  made  to  drink  into  one  Spirit."  1  Cor.  xii,  13. 
"2STow  he  which  cstnblishcth  us  with  you  in  Christ,  and  hath 
anointed  us,  is  God;  who  hath  also  sealed  us,  and  given  the 
earnest  of  the  Spirit  in  our  hearts."  2  Cor.  i,  21,  22.  "But 
we  all,  with  open  face  beholding  as  in  h  glass  the  glory  of  the 
Lord,  are  changed  into  the  same  image  from  glory  to  glory, 
even  as  by  the  Spirit  of  the  Lord."  2  Cor.  iii,  IS.  U  there  be 
"kindred  spirits"  in  this  world,  they  are  those  who  have  been 
made  to  drink  into  one  Spirit,  and  that  the  Spirit  of  Christ. 
Oneness  in  Christ  Jesus  is  the  most  perfect  unity  that  i=  found 
in  any  of  the  associations  of  earth.  One  nature,  a  renewed 
one ;  one  experience,  one  worship  and  service,  one  destiny.  The 
minister  can  have  no  sweeter  fellowship  than  spiritual  com- 
munion with  his  people;  no  richer  joy  than  to  share  with  them 
their  pleasures  of  devotion,  their  spiritual  banquets  at  the  table 
^f  the  Lord ;  their  foretaste  of  glory  at  the  gate  of  heaven. 
No  ministers  have  ever  shared  this  bliss  more  fully  than  those 
Of  the  Methodist  Church.     Saved  ourselves,  conscious  of  God's 


334:  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  [July, 

pardoning  mercy  and  adopting  love ;  that  the  blood  of  Christ 
cleanseth  us  from  all  sin;  dwelling  in  God  and  God  dwelling 
in  us,  we  have  instructed  and  exhorted  our  people  to  seek  the 
witness  of  the  Spirit,  and  to  go  on  to  perfection.  In  our  social 
meetings  we  have  encouraged  all  our  members,  even  babes  in 
Christ,  to  declare  what  the  Lord  has  done  for  them.  In  our 
class  meetings  and  love-feasts  we  statedly  hear  them  speak  of 
the  dealings  of  the  Lord,  and  frequently  go  with  them  as  far  as 
the  land  of  Beulah,  and  hear  their  last  and  sweetest  utterances 
of  the  things  of  God.  Our  periodicals  are  weekly  recording- 
death  scenes  as  blessed  and  as  sublime  as  were  those  of  Stephen 
or  Paul.  Blessed  be  God  for  brethren  and  sisters  who  live 
happy  and  die  happy  in  the  Lord ! 

III.  They  rejoiced  in  their  Christian  integrity  and  fidelity: 
"I  thank  my  God  always  on  your  behalf,  for  the  grace  of  God 
which  is  given  you  by  Jesus  Christ ;  that  in  every  thing  ye  are 
enriched  by  him,  in  all  utterance,  and  in  all  knowledge."  1  Cor. 
i,  4,  5.  "  Now  I  praise  you,  brethren,  that  ye  remember  me 
in  all  things,  and  keep  the  ordinances,  as  I  delivered  them  to 
you."  1  Cor.  xi,  2.  And  I  wrote  this  same  unto  you,  lest, 
when  I  came,  I  should  have  sorrow  from  them  of  whom  I 
ought  to  rejoice  ;  having  confidence  in  you  all,  that  my  joy  is 
the  joy  of  you  all."  2  Cur.  ii,  3.  "  Great  is  my  boldness  of 
speech  toward  you,  great  is  my  glorying  of  you  :  I  am  filled 
with  comfort,  I  am  exceeding  joyful  in  all  our  tribulation.  I 
rejoice  therefore  that  I  have  confidence  in  you  in  all  things." 
2  Cor.  vii,  4,  1G.  Herein  the  Apostle  rejoices  greatly  ;  he  is 
filled  with  comfort.  He  glories  in  their  character,  the  grace 
they  had  received,  their  spiritual  knowledge,  their  observance 
of  the  ordinances,  and  their  reciprocal  joy. 

TVe  can  say  quite  as  much  of  the  members  of  our  Church. 
Speaking  for  the  ministry,  we  say  to  the  laity,  "We  rejoice  that 
we  have  "confidence  in  you  in  all  things /"  in  your  profession, 
its  sincerity,  its  correctness;  in  your  Christian  principles,  in 
their  soundness  and  strength;  in  your  devotion  to  God,  its 
ardor  and  entirety  ;  in  your  love  to  the  Chinch,  your  earnest 
attachment  to  the  institutions  and  interests  of  the  branch  to 
which  you  belong;  we  have  confidence  in  you  in  all  things. 
The  most  important  modification  in  our  polity  ever  proposed 
lias  been  referred  to  your  will  by  the  General  Conference. 


1869 J  A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  335 

No  question  of  confidence  or  honor  can  be  agitated  between 
tlie  laity  and  ministry  of  the  Church.  On  such  a  question  the 
laity  would  hear  the  ministry  saying  with  one  voice:  "  For  we 
arc  irlad,  when  we  are  weak,  and  ye  are  strong :  and  this  also 
we  wish,  even  your  perfection."  2  Cor.  xiii,  9.  All  the  ques- 
tions under  discussion  among  us  are  questions  of  expediency 
and  usefulness.  Here  differences  of  judgment  may  arise,  and 
even  questions  of  conscience  and  earnest  debate  may  arise  ; 
but  the  wisdom,  love,  and  prayer  of  the  Church  will  settle  them 
wisely  and  to  the  glory  of  God. 

IV.  The  Apostles  rejoiced  in  the  co-operation  of  the  Church 
in  their  spiritual  enterprises.  1.  By  supporting  the  Pastors. 
"  If  we  have  sown  unto  you  spiritual  things,  is  it  a  great  thing 
if  Ave  shall  reap  your  carnal  things?"  1  Cor.  ix,  11. 

2.  By  prayers.  "  Ye  also  helping  together  by  prayer  for 
us,  that  for  the  gift  bestowed  upon  us  by  the  means  of  many 
persons  thanks  may  be  given  by  many  on  our  behalf." 
2  Cor.  i,  11. 

3.  By  ministering  to  the  saints.  "  For  as  touching  the  min- 
istering to  the  saints,  it  is  superfluous  for  me  to  write  to  you : 
for  I  know  the  forwardness  of  your  mind,  for  which  I  boast  of 
you  to  them  of  Macedonia."  2  Cor.  ix,  1,  2. 

4.  In  their  missionary  work.  "Not  boasting  of  things 
without  our  measure,  that  is,  of  other  men's  labors  ;  but  having 
hope,  when  your  faith  is  increased,  that  we  shall  be  enlarged 
by  yon  according  to  our  rule  abundantly,  to  preach  the  Gospel 
in  the  regions  beyond  you,  and  not  to  boast  in  another  man's 
line  of  things  made  ready  to  our  hand."  2  Cor.  x,  15,  16. 

5.  In  general  usefulness.  "  And  God  is  able  to  make  all 
grace  abound  toward  you  ;  that  ye,  always  having  all  sufficiency 
in  all  things,  may.  abound  to  every  good  work."  2  Cor.  ix,  8. 
"Therefore,  my  beloved  brethren,  be  ye  steadfast,  immovable, 
always  abounding  in  the  work  of  the  Lord,  forasmuch  as  ye 
know  that  your  labor  is  not  in  vain  in  the' Lord."  1  Cor.  xv,  58. 

"We  are  under  equal  obligation  to  our  people  for  their 
intelligent,  generous,  prayerful  co-operation.  They  sustain 
their  Pastors  and  their  Missionaries  at  an  annual  expense  of 
several  millions  of  dollars.  Though,  owing  to  circumstances 
which  as  yet  are  found  uncontrollable,  some  of  the  Pastors 
Ittffer  severely,  yet  as  a  whole  the  support  is  liberal.     They 


336  A  Valid  Ministry  and  Tonic  Church.  [July, 

also  have  provided  four  thousand  parsonages,  at  a  cost  of  some 
six  millions  of  dollars;  some  twelve  thousand  churches,  at  an 
expense  of  about  forty  millions  of  dollars ;  paid  for  property 
of  our  literary  institutions  more  than  ten  millions  of  dollars. 
These  are  noble  contributions.  But  the  time  which  has  been 
given  to  the  Church  by  these  princely  laymen  is,  perhaps, 
worth  still  more.  This  property  has  not  been  accumulated  and 
taken  care  of  without  much  time  and  attention.  The  direction 
of  our  benevolent  institutions  is  also  largely  under  the  super- 
vision and  direction  of  our  laymen,  and  not  only  taxes  their 
purses,  but  also  their  time.  The  spiritual  work  they  perform 
is  even  more  important.  The  one  hundred  and  seventy-five 
thousand  officers  and  teachers  in  our  Sunday-schools,  the  ten 
thousand  Local  Preachers,  the  tens  of  thousands  of  Class  Leaders, 
the  Stewards,  the  Trustees,  a  grand  co-operative  force,  working 
voluntarily,  yet  officially,  with  the  Pastors.  The  religious 
activities  of  the  laity  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  have 
never  been  exceeded  by  those  of  any  Church  since  the  day  of 
Pentecost.  Never  were  Christian  efforts  to  spread  the  knowl- 
edge of  God  and  to  advance  the  kingdom  of  Christ  more 
wisely  directed,  or  zealously  prosecuted,  or  attended  with  greater 
success.  The  Church  has  been  a  royal  priesthood.  Her  mem- 
bers have  been  steadfast,  immovable,  always  abounding  in  the 
work  of  the  Lord.  Heaven  and  earth  bear  witness  that  their 
labors  have  not  been  in  vain  in  the  Lord. 

Now  is  all  this  history  a  delusion?  Are  all  these  services 
vain  ?  Are  we  heathen  ?  Are  we  outside  of  the  true  Church  ? 
Are  all  these  proceedings  irregular  or  antiscriptural  ?  Are  we 
at  best  sharing  only  uncovenanted  mercies?  The  comparison 
we  have  instituted  between  the  Corinthian  Church  and  the 
Methodist  Episcopal  Church  answers  all  these  inquiries. 

If  the  Corinthian  Church  was  a  Christian  Church,  then  is 
the  Methodist  Church  a  Christian  Church.  If  the  ministry  by 
whose  planting  and  watering  the  Corinthian  Church  was 
raised  up  and  edified  was  a  Christian  ministry,  then  is  tlie 
[Methodist  ministry  a  Christian  ministry.  Wre  know  this  from 
the  concurrent  consciousness  of  the  ministers  and  the  Church. 
We  know  it  from  the  sameness  of  their  spiritual  endowments 
and  divine  qualifications.  We  know  it  from  the  similarity  of 
the  spirit  and  manner  of  executing  their  ministry.     We  know 


1SC0.)         A  Valid  Ministry  and  True  Church.  337 

it  from  the  equal  devotedness  of  the  ministry.  We  know  it  from 
the  oneness  of  the  doctrines  tanglit.  "We  know  it  from  the 
fame  legitimate  results,  the  same  soul-saving  issues.  We  know- 
it  because  we  see  every-where  our  letters  of  commendation  in 
the  handwriting  of  God.  We  see  every- where  the  seals  of  our 
ftpostleship  on  the  hearts  of  the  people.  JSo  ministry  ever 
J.uew  it  more  certainly,  or  rejoiced  in  it  more  divinely,  or 
labored  in  it  more  scripturally.  '''Doubtless  thou  art  our 
Father,  though  Abraham  be  ignorant  of  us,  and  Israel  acknowl- 
edge us  not.  Thou,  O  Lord,  art  our  Father,  our  Redeemer; 
thy  name  is  from  everlasting." 

As  the  ministers  and  laity  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church 
constitute  as  certainly  and  fully  as  did  the  Corinthian  Church 
a  true  Church  of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  so  are  the  temples 
they  build  and  consecrate  to  God  Christian  temples,  as  holy 
aud  sacred  as  any  God  dwells  in  on  earth.  Most  despicable  are 
the  meanness  and  arrogance  that  seek  to  degrade  them  by  call- 
ing them  "Meeting-houses"  in  contradistinction  from  other 
places  of  worship  called  "Churches,"  assumed  to  be  more 
wcrcd.  If  the  glory  of  the  Lord  filling  these  houses— if  God's 
recording  his  name  in  them,  and  coming  unto  the  people  who 
assemble  in  them  and  blessing  them — if  this  and  that  man's 
being  born  in  them  sanctifies  them,  then  are  they  none  other 
than  houses  of  God,  sanctuaries  of  the  Most  High,  heavenly 
places  in  Christ  Jesus,  as  holy  and  sacred  and  useful  as  any 
houses  built  for  God. 

Then,  too,  are  the  sacraments  administered  by  us  as  valid 
and  efficacious  and  scriptural  as  those  enjoyed  by  any  other 
branch  of  the  Christian  Church.  All  this  we  steadfastly  be- 
lieve. Wre  also  believe  in  the  "holy  catholic"  or  general 
Church,  and  in  communion  with  all  saints.  We  are  companions 
of  all  them  that  fear  God  and  keep  his  precepts.  Grace  be  with 
all  them  that  love  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ  in  sincerity!  Xow 
Onto  Him  that  is  able  to  do  exceeding  abundantly  above  all 
that  we  ask  or  think,  according  to  the  power  that  worketh  in 
BB,  unto  Ilim  be  glory  in  the  Church,  by  Christ  Jesus,  through- 
out all  ages,  world  without  end.     Amen. 


33S  Litcralitij  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  [July> 


Abt.  n.— literality  of  the  account  of  the 

GARDEN  OF  EDEN. 

In  the  second  and  third  chapters  of  Genesis  is  found  an  account 
of  the  garden  of  Eden  as  the  first  abode  of  man.  The  account 
given  of  that  garden,  and  of  the  transactions  said  to  have  been 
enacted  in  connection  therewith,  have  been  made  the  subject 
of  much  investigation  and  criticism  by  good  and  learned  men, 
and  yet  it  cannot  be  affirmed  that  they  have  removed  all 
difficulty  and  obscurity  from  the  subject.  So  have  the  same 
topics  been  made  the  subject  of  much  skeptical  criticism,  and 
even  vulgar  ridicule,  by  impious  unbelievers,  and  yet  they  have 
failed  to  prove  the  history  false  or  unreasonable.  It  never  can 
be  proved  to  be  false,  for  the  reason  that  there  is  no  higher 
proof  which  can  reach  the  case  than  the  history  itself.  There 
is  no  prior  or  contemporary  document  which  can  contradict 
the  Bible  record,  and  there  is  nothing  contradictory  or  im- 
possible in  the  account  itself.  The  Bible  story  of  the  origin 
and  first  condition  and  acts  of  man  has  a  decided  advantage 
over  all  modem  speculative  theories;  it  claims  to  be  a  record  of 
the  facts,  it,  can  never  be  disproved,  and  it  is  the  only  document 
which  claims  to  be  such  a  record. 

It  is  not  intended  to  join  issue  with  Deism,  or  with  any 
other  form  of  open  infidelity  in  this  article;  but  there  have 
been  some  disguised  attacks  upon  the  integrity  of  this  portion 
of  sacred  history  which  demands  attention.  It  has  been  insisted 
by  some  that  the  account  of  the  garden  of  Eden,  and  of  the  sin 
of  Adam  and  Eve  and  their  expulsion,  is  only  a  myth,  or,  at 
most,  only  an  allegory.  It  is  with  this  class  that  the  issue  is 
joined.  The  following  is  a  statement  of  the  position  that  will 
be  maintained. 

The  Integrity  of  the  Christian  Record  requires  us  to 
maintain  the  literality  op  the  account  of  the  garden 
of  Eden. 

1.  The  account  of  the  garden  of  Eden  is  a  link  in  the  chain 
of  history  so  connected,  that  if  this  link  be  dissolved  into  a 
myth,  or  transformed  into  an  allegory,  it  will  not  only  sever  the 
chain,  but  loosen  it  at  the  end  from  the  first  great  starting  point 


1869J  Literaliiy  of  the  Garden  of  Eden,  339 

of  realities,  leaving  no  land-fastening.  It  is  a  part  of  the 
account  of  creation.  The  history  of  the  garden  embrace-  the  only 
account  we  have  of  the  origin  of  our  race,  for  the  man  whom 
God  formed  out  of  the  dust  of  the  ground  was  the  same  man 
which  he  put  in  the  garden,  and  who  also  was  the  father  of  the 
race,  so  that  if  the  garden  is  a  myth  the  man  is  a  myth  also  ;  and 
if  the  story  of  the  garden  is  an  allegory,  the  story  of  the  man  is 
also  an  allegory;  and  so  far  as  the  Scriptures  are  concerned  we 
have  no  account  of  the  origin  of  our  race,  and  the  Bible  history 
of  humanity  ends  in  a  myth  or  an  allegory  as  you  trace  it  upward. 

The  first  sin  committed  by  man,  commonly  characterized  us 
the  fall,  constitutes  the  principal  topic  of  the  account  of  the 
garden,  so  that  if  this  story  is  a  myth  the  Scriptures  give  us  no 
matter-of-fact  account  of  the  introduction  of  sin  into  this  world. 
Cut  that  first  sin,  said  to  have  been  committed  in  the  garden, 
constitutes  the  historic  stand-point  of  the  world's  redemption 
by  Christ.  Make  the  account  of  the  garden  a  myth,  and  you 
leave  only  a  myth  for  the  first  great  historic  event  in  the  stor}r 
of  redemption,  which  is  the  greatest  wonder  of  all  the  wonders 
that  ever  astonished  angels,  men,  or  devils. 

The  story  of  the  garden,  and  of  the  transactions  said  to  have 
taken  place  therein,  constitutes  the  beginning  of  the  only  his- 
tory we  have  of  our  race,  and  if  it  is  a  myth  the  Bible  gives  us 
no  truthful  account  of  the  commencement  of  the  human  family. 
The  Bible  history  makes  the  same  Adam  and  Eve  who  were  in 
the  garden,  and  were  driven  out  of  M  on  account  of  their  dis- 
obedience, the  father  and  mother  of  us  all.  The  Adam  and  Eve 
of  the  garden  were  the  father  and  mother  of  Cain  and  Abel.  The 
same  Adam  and  Eve  were  the  father  and  mother  of  Seth,  from 
whom  Xoah  descended,  who  alone  with  his  family  crossed  the 
flood  to  people  the  world  on  this  side.  From  Noah  Abraham 
descended,  and  Christ  descended  from  Abraham,  who  was  the 
promised  Seed  of  the  woman  of  the  garden  that  was  to  bruise 
the  serpent's  head.  Thus,  if  you  make  a  myth  of  the  story  of 
the  garden,  the  only  history  of  humanity  ends  in  a  myth  where 
it  began,  if  you  trace  it  backward.  Make  a  myth  of  the  story 
<*f  the  garden,  and  the  genealogy  of  Christ  ends  in  a  myth. 

2.  The  garden  of  Eden,  with  the  events  historically  connected 
With  it.  are  so  referred  to  by  later  inspired  writers  as  to  impeach 
'iie  whole  Bible  history,  if  that  be  only  a  myth  or  an  allegory. 


340  IAtcrality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  [July, 

The  recorded  facts  are  referred  to  by  various  writers,  not  as  to 
a  myth  or  an  allegory,  but  as  to  historical  facts.  "  And  Lot 
lifted  up  his  eye?,  and  beheld  all  the  plain  of  Jordan,  that  it  was 
well , watered  every-wliere  before  the  Lord  destroyed  Sodom 
and  Gomorrah,  even  as  the  garden  of  the  Lord."  Gen.  xiii,  10. 
"  The  Lord  shall  comfort  Zion ;  he  shall  comfort  all  her  waste 
places,  and  he  will  make  her  wilderness  like  Eden,  and  her 
desert  like  the  garden  of  the  Lord."  Isa,  li,  3.  "  Thou  hast 
been  in  Eden,  the  garden  of  the  Lord."  Ezek.  xxviii,  13. 
"  I  have  made  him  fair  by  the  multitude  of  his  branches :  so 
that  all  the  trees  of  Eden  that  were  in  the  garden  of  God 
envied  him."  Ezek.  xxxi,  9.  "  The  land  is  as  the  garden  of 
Eden  before  them,  behind  them  a  desolate  wilderness."  Joel  ii,  3. 
"If  I  covered  my  transgressions  as  Adam."  Job  xxxi,  33. 
The  above  texts  all  clearly  refer  to  the  account  of  the  garden 
of  Eden  as  a  fact  in  history,  known  and  believed. 

The  New  Testament  contains  still  more  conclusive  references 
to  the  history  of  the  garden  of  Eden.  Christ,  in  his  reply  to 
the  Pharisees  on  the  subject  of  divorce,  quoted  the  very  words 
of  Adam,  uttered  in  the  garden  of  Eden  over  the  woman  whom, 
according  to  the  account,  God  had  formed  out  of  one  of  his 
ribs.  "  For  this  cause  shall  a  man  leave  his  father  and  his 
mother  and  shall  cleave  to  his  wife:  and  they  twain  shall  be 
one  flesh."  Matt,  xix,  5  ;  Gen.  ii,  24.  "  But  I  fear,  lest  by  any 
means,  as  the  serpent  beguiled  Eve  through  his  subtilty,  so  your 
minds  should  be  corrupted  from  the  simplicity  that  is  in  Christ." 
2  Cor.  xi,  3.  "Adam  was  first  formed, then  Eve.  And  Adam 
was  not  deceived,  but  the  woman  being  deceived  was  in  the 
transgression."  1  Tim.  ii,  13,  14.  These  allusions  to  the  gar- 
den of  Eden  are  such  as  to  prove  the  account  to  be  real  history, 
or  to  impeach  the  iSTew  Testament  by  supposing  that  it  rests 
some  of  its  fundamental  principles  upon  a  myth  or  an  allegory. 

3.  Paul  selects  the  transactions  of  the  garden  as  his  first 
grand  stand-point  from  which  he  contemplates  the  world's 
redemption.  The  great  Apostle  grounds  the  necessity  of  re- 
demption upon  what  took  place  in  the  garden,  by  which  the 
whole  race  was  involved  in  sin,  and  from  this  point  he  runs  a 
parallel  between  the  Adam  of  the  garden,  the  firet  Adam, 
that  sinned,  and  Christ,  the  second  Adam,  the  redeemer  and 
restorer  of  what  was  lost  in  the  first  Adam. 


1SC9.1  Literality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  341 

God  said  to  the  serpent  in  the  garden,  "I  will  put  enmity 
between  thee  and  the  woman,  and  between  thy  seed  and  her 
Seed;  it  shall  bruise  thy  head,  and  thou  shalt  bruise  his 
heel."  Gen.  iii,  15.  This  has  been  understood  as  referring  to 
Christ  as  the  Seed  of  the  woman ;  and  though  this  interpreta- 
tion of  the  text  is  not  essential  to  the  validity  of  Christianity,  nor 
to  the  soundness  of  the  present  general  argument,  it  is  proper 
to  show  that  the  idea  is  interwoven  into  the  entire  history  of 
redemption.  The  genealogy  of  Christ  is  carefully  traced  baek 
tu  the  Adam  and  Eve  of  the  garden.  Christ  was  promised  to 
Abraham  as  his  Seed,  and  Paul,  referring  to  this  fact,  no  doubt 
with  reference  to  what  was  said  in  the  garden,  that  the  Seed  of 
the  woman  should  bruise  the  serpent's  head,  comments  as  fol- 
lows: "Now  to  Abraham  and  his  Seed  were  the  promises 
made.  He  saith  not,  and  to  seeds,  as  of  many ;  but  as  of  one, 
and  to  thy  Seed,  which  is  Christ."  Gal.  iii,  16.  And  so  literal 
were  the  words  uttered  in  the  garden  concerning  the  Seed  of 
the  woman,  that  their  fulfillment  required  that  Christ  should 
be  the  seed  of  the  woman  without  a  human  father.  He  was 
the  son  of  a  virgin,  and  was  thus  the  seed  of  the  woman  in  a 
sense  not  true  of  any  other  human  being.  This  makes  the 
words  uttered  in  the  garden,  which  some  call  a  myth  or  an 
allegory,  not  only  literal  history,  but  in  this  item  a  prophecy 
of  the  most  profound  importance.  Paul  gives  this  subject 
special  notice  when  he  says,  "But  when  the  fullness  of  time 
was  come,  God  sent  forth  his  Son,  made  of  a  woman,  made 
under  the  law,  to  redeem  them  that  were  under  the  law.'* 
Gal.  iv,  4,  5.  Also,  no  doubt  with  direct  reference  to  what 
was  said  in  the  garden,  that  the  Seed  of  the  woman  should 
bruise  the  serpent's  head,  Paul  says,  "  The  God  of  peace  shall 
bruise  Satan  under  your  feet  shortly."  Rom.  xvi,  20. 

frt.  Paul,  while  discussing  the  great  doctrine  of  the  resurrec- 
tion, gives  us  the  following  parallels  between  the  Adam  of  the 
pardeu  and  Christ:  "But  now  is  Christ  risen  from  the  dead, 
*nd  become  the  first-fruits  of  thorn  that  slept.  For  since  by 
l!*an  came  death,  by  man  came  also  the  resurrection  of  the 
'lead.  For  as  in  Adam  all  die,  even  so  in  Christ  shall  all  be 
•Hade  alive."  1  Cor.  xv,  20-22.  lSTo  one  can  doubt  that  the 
A.dam  here  named,  by  whom  death  came  and  in  whom  all  die, 
U  the  same  Adam  upon  whom  the  sentence  of  death  was 

Fornnu  Semes,  Vol.  XXL— 22 


342  Literality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  [J\il\-, 

passed  in  the  garden  of  Eden;  and  if  so,  Paul  must  have  re- 
garded that  account  as  literal  history,  or  he  would  not  have- 
thus  reasoned  from  it  in  proof  of  the  important  doctrine  of  the 
resurrection  of  the  dead. 

But  Paul  gives  Ills  strongest  argument  in  his  Epistle  to  the 
Romans:  "Wherefore,  as  by  one  man  sin  entered  into  the  world, 
and  death  by  sin ;  and  so  death  passed  upon  all  men,  for  that 
all  have  sinned  :  for  until  the  law  sin  was  in  the  world:  but 
sin  is  not  imputed  where  there  is  no  law.  Xevertheless  death 
reigned  from  Adam  to  Moses,  even  over  them  that  had  not 
sinned  after  the  similitude  of  Adam's  transgression,  who  is 
the  figure  of  Jlim  that  was  to  come.  But  not  as  the  offense,  so 
also  is  the  free  gift:  for  if  through  the  offense  of  one  many  be 
dead,  much  more  the  grace  of  God,  and  the  gift  by  grace,  which 
is  by  one  man,  Jesus  Christ,  hath  abounded  unto  many.  And 
not  as  it  was  by  one  that  sinned,  so  is  the  gift;  for  the  judg- 
ment, was  by  one  to  condemnation,  but  the  free  gift  is  of  many 
offenses  unto  justification.  For  if  .by  one  man's  offense  death 
reigned  by  one ;  much  more  they  which  receive  abundance  of 
grace  and  of  the  gift  of  righteousness  shall  reign  in  life  by 
one,  Jesus  Christ.  Therefore,  as  by  the  offense  of  one  judgment 
came  upon  all  men  to  condemnation;  even  so  by  the  righteous- 
ness of  one  the  free  gift  came  upon  all  men  unto  justification 
of  life."  Rom.  v,  12-1S. 

The  account  of  the  garden  of  Eden  narrates  the  only  trans- 
actions in  the  history  of  humanity  to  which  Paul  can  have  re- 
ferred in  the  above  scripture;  and  if  we  rarely  that  into  a 
myth,  or  transform  it  into  an  allegory,  we  leave  Paul  nothing 
but  a  mythical  or  an  allegorical  foundation  for  his  masterly 
argument,  at  the  profoundness  of  which  the  deepest  Christian 
theologians  have  been  awed,  and  the  most  thinking  infidels 
have  wondered.  It  appears  impossible  that  any  one  should 
doubt  that  Paul's  one  man  that  sinned,  by  whose  sin  death  en- 
tered into  the  world,  and  passed  upon  all  because  it  involved 
all  in  sin,  is  the  man  who  sinned  in  the  garden.  There  is  no 
other  one  man  named  in  the  Bible  by  whom  sin  and  death  can 
have  entered  the  world.  Jt  appears  impossible  to  doubt  that 
the  Adam  of  Paul's  argument,  from  whom  death  reigned  un- 
til the  time  of  Moses  without  any  written  law,  is  the  same 
Adam  upon  whom  the  sentence  of  death  was  pronounced  in 


1S00.3  laterality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  343 

Eden.  The  argument  of  the  Apostle  is  built  upon  two  prin- 
cipal facts. 

First,  Adam,  the  one  man  that  sinned,  by  whose  offense 
many,  that  is,  all,  were  made  sinners,  creating  the  necessity  for 
the  redemption  of  the  race,  was  the  first  man  of  the  race,  the 
lather  of  all  men.  Jews  and  Gentiles  alike  suffered  by  the  sin 
of  the  one  man,  and  alike  needed  redemption.  Hence  it  is 
that  this  one  man,  Adam  of  the  garden,  was  the  father  of  Scth, 
from  whom  the  race  is  traced  down  to  Noah,  from  whom  both 
the  Jews  and  Gentiles  have  their  descent. 

The  second  fact  upon  which  Paul's  argument  is  built  is,  that 
Christ,  the  Redeemer,  descended  from  the  same  one  man, 
Adam,  was  the  Seed  of  the  one  woman,  Eve,  the  wife  of  the 
one  man,  Adam,  so  that  the  Gentiles,  who  could  claim  no  rela- 
tion to  him  through  Abraham,  could  claim  such  relation  through 
Noah,  from  whom  Jews  and  Gentiles  are  traced  in  one  genea- 
logical line  up  to  Adam.  Corresponding  to  these  facts,  we 
have  the  genealogy  of  Christ,  carefully  traced  up  to  Adam  and 
Eve,  who  figured  in  the  garden,  and  were  turned  out  of  it  on 
account  of  their  sin,  connecting  the  Christ  of  the  garden  of  Geth- 
eemane  and  the  cross,  with  the  Adam,  the  sinner,  in  the  garden 
of  Eden.  Thus  are  all  men  who  need  redemption,  and  Christ 
the  Redeemer,  ecjually  connected  with  Adam,  the  first  sinner. 
The  argument  then  is,  that  as  the  whole  human  race  has  de- 
scended from  Adam,  the  first  sinner,  and  are  sinners  like  him, 
So  Christ,  after  the  flesh,  descended  from  the  same  Adam,  and 
stands  related,  not  only  to  the  Jews  through  Abraham,  but  to 
the  whole  lost  race  through  Noah  and  Adam.  Break  this 
chain,  by  which  Christ  the  Redeemer,  together  with  the  whole 
redeemed  race,  stands  connected  with  the  Adam  of  the  garden, 
or  remove  the  literality  of  that  garden  by  dissolving  it,  into  a 
myth  or  converting  it  into  an  allegory,  and  you  will  subvert 
Paul's  argument,  and  overthrow  his  entire  view  of  the  plan  of 
redemption. 

■i.  The  laxity  of  interpretation  which  is  necessary  to  reach 
the  conclusion  that  the  account  of  the  garden  of  Eden  is  a 
niyth  or  an  allegory,  if  allowed,  will  enable  every  person  to 
explain  away  a  large  portion  of  the  Scriptures  so  far  as  any 
settled  and  literal  sense  is  concerned.  The  story  of  Cain  and 
Abel  can  quite  as  easily  be  considered  a  myth;  60  can  the  ac- 


344  laterality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  [July, 

count  of  the  translation  of  Enoch.  The  story  of  the  flood  and 
Noah's  ark  may  as  easily  be  turned  into  a  myth.  The  call  of 
Abraham,  and  in  particular  his  call  to  offer  his  son  Isaac,  has 
no  stronger  claim  to  be  a  literal  history  than  the  account  of 
the  garden  of  Eden.  Moses  in  his  ark  of  bulrushes  would  be 
a  beautiful  myth  under  this  latitudinarian  mode  of  interpreta- 
tion. The  booh  of  Job  is  easily  converted  into  a  grand  legend. 
The  exit  of  Elijah  becomes  a  splendid  myth,  and  the  whole 
book  of  Jonah  is  no  more  than  a  legend,  and  an  extravagant 
one  at  that.  The  history  of  the  miraculous  conception  has 
been  declared  to  be  a  legend,  which  was  written  and  added  to 
St.  Matthew's  Gospel  in  after  years.  If  we  allow  ourselves 
thus  to  tamper  with  the  record,  landmark  after  landmark  will 
vanish,  stand-point  after  stand-point  will  be  changed,  until  we 
shall  have  no  anchoring  ground  left  into  which  to  cast  the 
moorings  of  our  faith  when  we  find  ourselves  drifting  before  the 
storm. 

5.  There  is  absolutely  no  necessity  for  such  a  latitudinarian 
construction  of  the  account  of  the  garden  of  Eden  as  will  make 
it  a  myth  or  an  allegory.  There  is  no  sufficient  reason  for  it, 
and  it  can  result  from  nothing  short  of  a  spirit  of  wild  specu- 
lation, or  an  intention  to  impair  the  Christian  record  and 
weaken  our  faith  in  the  same.  This  position  is  worthy  of  a 
brief  examination. 

It  is  not  contended  that  the  document  has  been  mistrans- 
lated, and  that  a  new  and  correct  translation  makes  it  read 
like  a  myth  or  an  allegory.  Such  a  position  would  challenge 
examination  by  affirming  a  sufficient  reason,  though  the  affir- 
mation were  false  ;  but  no  such  claim  has  been  set  up. 

It  is  not  pretended  that  the  document  has  been  changed  by 
design  or  by  the  errors  of  copyists,  and  that  to  bring  it  back 
to  its  original  state  will  show  it  to  be  a  myth  or  an  allegory. 
If  it  were  claimed  that  some  more  ancient  Hebrew  copies  had 
been  found  by  which  it  would  stand  corrected,  every  true 
Christian  scholar,  and  every  firm  believer  in  the  Scriptures 
would  say,  Bring  forward  your  ancient  copies,  prove  their  an- 
tiquity, and  let  us  compare  and  make  all  required  correction, 
that  wc  may  have  the  record  as  God  gave  it  to  man.  Hut  no 
such  position  is  attempted  to  be  maintained,  and  it  would  be 
only  a  pretense  if  such  attempt  was  made. 


1SC9.3  Literality  of  the  Garden  of  Eden.  345 

It  is  not  necessary  to  convert  the  story  of  the  garden  of 
Eden  into  a  myth  or  an  allegory  as  a  means  of  conforming  the 
record  to  the  truth  of  science.  Xo  modern  scientific  discov- 
eries contradict  the  literality  of  the  account  of  the  garden  of 
Eden,  and  of  Adam  and  Eve.  The  theology  of  the  Church 
once  taught  that  this  earth  was  a  stationary  plain,  anQ  that 
the  sun  moved  around  it;  hut  science  has  corrected  that  error, 
though  the  priests  and  doctors  for  a  time  fought  manfully 
against  it.  But  that  error  and  its  correction  does  not  involve 
the  truth  of  the  record,  but  only  our  interpretation  of  it.  Though 
men  have  often  been  proved  mistaken  in  regard  to  science, 
and  may  be  again,  yet  all  real  science  is  truth  itself,  and  our 
opinions  must  stand  corrected  by  its  undoubted  affirmations. 
So  conclusive,  however,  are  the  proofs  of  the  inspiration  of  the 
Scriptures,  that  if  clearly-ascertained  principles  of  science  con- 
tradict their  supposed  teaching,  we  should  at  once  suspect  our 
understanding  of  them ;  for  the  conflict  cannot  be  with  what 
the  Scriptures  really  teach,  but  only  with  our  interpretation 
of  them.  But  no  scientific  principles  have  been  developed 
which  conflict  with  the  literality  of  the  account  of  the  garden 
of  Eden.  It  is  not  a  question  which  can  be  brought  to  the  test 
of  any  of  the  sciences.  Astronomy  does  not  reach  it,  geology 
(Iocs  not  reach  it,  anatomy  does  not  reach  it,  physiology  does 
not  reach  it ;  in  a  word,  no  science  reaches  it.  It  is  claimed 
that  geology  has  demonstrated  that  the  earth  is  more  than  six 
thousand  years  old.  Be  it  so ;  but  whether  the  account,  of  the 
garden  of  Eden  is  an  historic  fact  or  a  myth  does  not  depend 
upon  the  age  of  the  world.  The  Bible  history  of  generations 
teaches  that  the  present  race  of  human  beings,  the  children  of 
Adam,  have  existed  upon  earth  only  about  six  thousand  years, 
and  geology  furnishes  no  proof  that  our  race  has  existed  longer 
than  the  Bible  history  of  Adam  and  his  descendants  allow. 
How  long  the  earth  existed  before  God  created  Adam  and 
planted  the  garden  is  another  question,  which  has  nothing  to 
do  with  the  character  of  this  part  of  the  history  as  literal  or 
mythical. 

The  conclusion  reached,  then,  is,  that  to  pronounce  the  ac- 
count of  the  garden  of  Eden  a  myth  or  an  allegory  is  to  sur- 
render a  fundamental  document  before  any  legal  demand  has 
been  made  for  it ;  it  is  to  make  a  free-will  offering  to  infidelity, 


346  Literality  of  the  Garden  of  Edtn.  [July, 

and  one  which  will  impair  the  foundation  of  our  religion.  It 
will  leave  us  without  the  slightest  history  of  our  race,  for  the 
llible  history  of  humanity  does  not  connect  us  with  the  man 
created  and  described  in  the  first  chapter  of  Genesis,  but  with 
the  man  Adam  of  the  garden  of  Eden.  It  will  leave  us  with- 
out any  account  of  the  introduction  of  sin  into  this  world  ;  for 
the  only  account  we  have  is  contained  in  the  history  of  the 
garden  of  Edeu  as  man's  first  abode.  It  will  subvert  many  of 
the  most  sublime  truths  and  richest  promises,  which  are  so 
connected  with  and  based  upon  the  literal  existence  of  the 
garden  of  Eden,  and  the  historic  truth  of  what  is  said 
to  have  transpired  therein,  as  to  stand  or  fall  with  the  lit- 
erality of  that  account.  Let  no  man, 
hand  upon  that  document. 


Akt.  III.— WIIEDOX   OX   MATTHEW. 

A  Commentary  on  the   Gospels  of  Matthew  and  Marl;.     Intended  for  Popular  Use. 
By  D.  D.  Whedox,  D..D.     Tenth  Thousand.     New  York:  Carlton  t  Porter. 

"  The  Evangelists,"  says  Bcngel,  "  contain  the  rudiments  of  the 
New  Testament;"  and  of  the  Evangelists  Matthew  is,  in  many 
regards,  the  chief.  "  There  is  not,"  according  to  Dr.  A.  Clarke, 
"one  truth  or  doctrine  in  the  whole  oracles  of  God  which  is 
not  taught  in  this  Evangelist.  The  outlines  of  the  whole 
spiritual  system  are  here  correctly  laid  down  :  even  Paul  him- 
self has  added  nothing;  he  has  amplified  and  illustrated  the 
truths  contained  in  this  Gospel ;  but,  even  under  the  inspiration 
of  the  Holy  Ghost,  neither  he  nor  any  of  the  other  Apostles 
have  brought  to  light  one  truth,  the  prototype  of  which  hns 
not  been  found  in  the  words  and  acts  of  our  blessed  Lord  as 
related  by  Matthew."  This  Gospel,  according  to  another,  is 
"the  most  singular  in  its  composition,  the  most  wonderful  in 
its  contents,  and  the  most  important  in  its  object,  that  was  ever 
exhibited  to  the  notice  of  mankind."  A  good  commentary, 
therefore,  on  the  Gospel  by  Matthew  ought  to  be  an  Institute 
of  Theology.  If  the  exegesis  be  clear  and  correct,  if  the  doc- 
trinal topics  be  properly  presented  and  intelligently  discussed, 
and  if  all  the  lights  of  learning,  research,  and  modern  science 


1SG9.]  Whedon  on  Matthew.  347 

be  thrown  upon  the  sacred  page,  a  commentary  on  Matthew's 
Gospel  will  be,  substantially,  a  complete  system  of  salvation. 

We  have  placed  at  the  head  of  this  article  the  "  Commen- 
tary on  the  Gospels,"  by  Dr.  Whedon,  not  because  Ave  purpose 
to  consider  the  observations  made  on  any  other  of  the  Gospels 
than  Matthew,  nor  because  we  intend  to  write  an  essay  with 
this  book  for  our  text,  or  suggestive  topic,  but  because  we  hope 
by  an  analysis  of  Dr.  Whedon's  exposition  of  the  chiefest  of  the 
Evangelists,  and  by  a  liberal  quotation  from  his  comments,  to 
show  our  readers  how  complete  a  theodicy  is  herein  presented, 
and  how  eminently  worthy  of  a  wide  circulation  in  the  Church 
is  the  book  itself.  Let  no  one  be  misled  by  the  declaration 
that  this  commentary  is  "  intended  for  popular  use."  That  it 
is  adapted  to  every  order  of  mind,  that  it  is  written  in  a  pithy, 
pungent,  popular  style,  that  every  truth  is  made  plain  lo  the 
commonest  understanding,  and  that  the  charms  of  a  faultless 
rhetoric  linger  on  every  page,  are  statements  which  might  be 
abundantly  verified.  But,  at  the  same  time,  there  is  no  lack 
of  logic,  no  dearth  of  learning,  and  no  scarcity  of  philosophy 
and  metaphysics.  The  work  which  the  author  undertook  is 
thoroughly  and  exhaustively  done.  He  attempted  "  the  clear 
presentation  of  the  meaning  and  spirit  of  the  text  itself;  "  and 
this  endeavor  has  been  crowned  with  a  rare  and  glorious 
success.  The  logic  is  not  dry,  the  learning  is  not  pedantic,  the 
philosophy  is  not  false,  and  the  metaphysics  are  not  muddy. 
In  a  style  clear  as  the  light  glows  the  luminous  truth.  Every 
page  sparkles  with  brief,  pertinent  sayings,  which  gleam  out 
suddenly,  like  the  stars  in  heaven.  The  incisive,  analytic 
mind  of  the  author  cuts  through  every  false  gloss,  exegesi>,  or 
doctrine,  and  displays,  in  the  beautiful  harmony  of  revelation, 
the  manifold  wisdom  of  God.  The  garnishings  of  rhetoric  and 
cruditio7i  do  not  hide  or  obscure  the  precious  truth  of  the 
inspired  word  ;  they  are  the  pictures  of  silver  for  the  apples  of 
gold.  That  it  is  the  constant  purpose  of  Dr.  Whedon  to  bring 
out  and  make  plain  the  mi  ml  of  the  Sjurit,  as  expressed  in  the 
text,  is  a  fact  to  which  every  page  of  this  commentary  bears 
testimony. 

This  commentary  should  be  studied  with  constant  reference 
to  the  "  Historical  Synopsis  of  the  Gospels,"  which  is  presented, 
in  a  tabulated  form,  as  a  sort  of  preface  both  to  the  text  and 


34:8  Whedon  on  Matthew.  tJnly, 

the  note?.      The  manifestation   and   ministry  of  our  Lord  is 
embraced  in  the  following  periods  : 

1.  The  Infancy  and  Childhood. 

2.  The  Qualification. 

3.  The  Preparatory  Ministry. 

4.  The  Platform  and  Extending  Ministry. 

5.  Apostolic  Commission,  and  Ministry  at  Zenith. 

6.  Transfiguration,  and  Ministry  of  Sorrow  and  Struggle. 

7.  The  Final  Journey  to  Jerusalem,  and  Contest  there. 

8.  The  Suffering. 

9.  Resurrection  and  Ascension. 

The  incidents  of  these  several  periods  are  arranged  in  sec- 
tions, and  designated  by  paragraphs,  so  that  the  historical 
synopsis  is  complete  ;  and  being  complete,  it  is  also  invaluable. 

Bengel's  and  "Wesley's  notes  are  remarkable  for  the  clearness 
and  accuracy  of  their  definitions;  to  these  "VThedon's  must  be 
added.  And  a  definition  often  amounts  to  a  demonstration. 
It  clears  away  the  mists  of  error,  as  it  elucidates  and  sets  forth 
the  truth.     We  append  a  few  examples  from  our  author : 

The  Gospel. — The  term  Gospel  is  compounded  of  the  two  Saxon 
words  god,  good,  aud  spd,  news.  It  is  the  good  news  of  a 
Saviour's  birth,  life,  and  death,  sent  from  God  to  man.  The  Greek 
word  evayyiXiov,  cvangel'mm,  (whence  comes  our  word  evangelist,) 
has  precisely  parallel  etymology.  The  word  gospel,  from  being 
the  name  for  the  subject  of  the  four  histories  of  our  Lord,  became, 
almost  immediately  after  their  publication,  the  title  of  the  books 
themselves.  Hence  this  book  is  called  the  Gospel  according  to 
Matthew,  as  being  its  author. 

A  type  is  a  person  or  object  divinely  designed  to  prefigure  ei 
future  character  or  object  to  which  it  bears  designed  resemblance. 
The  future  object  so  prefigured  is  called  the  antitype.  Type  is 
therefore  visible  prediction,  as  prophecy  is  spoken  prediction. 
Thus  the  sacrifices  were  divinely-appointed  types  of  the  great 
atoning  sacrifice  of  Christ.  An  entire  set  or  combination  of  objects 
may  be  typical  of  an  entire  set  of  antitypical  objects. 

Jesus  Christ. — The  word  Jesus  is,  in  Greek  form,  the  same  as 
Joshua  in  Hebrew,  and  implies  Saviour.  Our  Lord  was  so  named 
(verse  21)  by  express  command  of  the  angel:  first,  to  indicate 
that  he  was  the  Saviour  from  sin  ;  and  second,  to  show  that  he 
was  the  antitype  of  Joshua,  his  type  ;  for  as  Joshua  was  lender  of 
Israel,  bringing  them  into  the  earthly  Canaan,  Jesus  is  a  Saviour, 
bringing  Ids  people  into  a  heavenly  Canaan.  So,  often  in  the 
Bible,  names  are  significant  and  typical,  being  divinely  and  pro- 
phetically given  for  that  very    purpose.     The  word  Christ   is  not 


1869.]  Whedon  on  Matthew.  349 

primarily  a  proper  name,  but  is  a  word  of  royal  office.  It  is  de- 
rived from  the  Greek  x?<0)->  chrio,  to  anoint;  and  is  exactly  parallel 
with  the  Hebrew  -word  Messiah,  both  signifying  anointed.  For  as 
the  Hebrews  anointed  kings  and  priests  to  their  dignity,  so  kings 
and  priests  were  called  anointed ;  and  so  the  prophets  foretold 
him  who  was  to  come  under  the  royal  and  priestly  title  of  Anointed, 
Messiah,  or  Chbistos.  Under  this  title  he  was  earnestly  waited 
for  by  the  Jews,  and  even  by  the  Samaritans,  as  the  Samaritan 
woman  testifies  :  I  know  that  Messias  cometh,  which  is  called 
Christ.  John  iv,  25.  Hence  our  Saviour's  name  was  Jesus  ;  and 
his  office  was  to  be  the  Christ,  or  royal  Messiah. 

Holy  Ghost. — The  word  ghost  is  derived  from  the  Saxon  word 
gast,  and  signifies  spirit.  Ghostly,  in  older  English,  (of  which 
ghastly  is  a  cognate,)  signifies  spiritual.  Holy  Ghost  is,  therefore, 
synonymous  with  Holy  Spirit.  Inasmuch  as  the  word  ghost  is 
almost  exclusively  applied  in  the  English  of  the  present  day  to  the 
apparition  of  a  departed  human  spirit,  it  would  be  better,  per- 
haps, in  case  of  a  new  translation,  to  disuse  the  word  ghost  in 
this  connection. 

In  the  comment  on  the  verse,  "  Except  ye  be  converted  and 
become  as  little  children,"  we  have  the  following  series  of 
definitions : 

Conversion  generally  implies  our  being  turned,  by  the  influence 
of  truth  and  the  Divine  Spirit,  with  the  consenting  act  of  our  own 
will,  from  our  course  as  sinners  to  the  ways  of  religion.  But  here, 
perhaps,  it  more  specially  signifies  the  being  brought  to  renounce 
the  disposition  to  seek  pre-eminence  or  power  over  our  fellows, 
especially  in  the  Church.  This  was  now  the  besetting  sin  of  the 
disciples,  of  which  it  was  their  momentous  duty  to  repent,  and,  by 
the  aid  of  divine  grace,  be  turned  or  converted.  In  this  work  God 
does  the  converting ;  man  does  the  repenting  and  the  turning  to 
the  new  course.  Justification  is  simply  the  pardon  of  our  sins 
through  the  merit  of  Christ.  Thereby  we  are  treated  by  God  as 
if  we  were  just,  or  innocent  of  sin  past.  Regeneration,  or  the 
being  born  again,  is  the  bestowment  of  those  new  feelings  of  love 
to  God  and  his  cause  by  -which  we  become  in  heart  and  soul 
children  of  God  ;  and  we  are  thence  adopted  into  his  family.  Sanc- 
tification  is  the  power  and  disposition,  mure  or  less  complete,  to 
live  free  from  sin,  to  overcome  temptation,  and  to  dwell  in  the 
uninterrupted  enjoyment  of  God's  smile. 

The  subject  of  the  Temptation  of  Jesus  is  thus  introduced, 

and  the  comments  correspond  with  the  indications  here  given  : 

For  great  missions  the  preparation  is  great  trials.  It  was 
befitting  that  the  newly  inaugurated  Prince  of  Light  should  come 
into  a  trial-contest  with  the  prince  of  darkness.  Our  views  of  this 
transaction  we  present  with  sincere  diffidence,  giving  often  what 


350  Whedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

appears  to  us  as  on  the  whole  the  best  solutions,  rather  than  dog- 
matic certainties. 

We  can  view  this  transaction  neither  as  a  mere  train  of  thought. 

as  a  vision,  as  a  parable,  nor  a  myth  ;  but  as  a  great  verity,  occu- 
pying a  most  significant  place  in  the  system  of  sacred  realities. 
The  first  Adam  truly  was  tempted,  and  fell ;  the  second  Adam  was 
as  truly  tempted,  and  won  the  victory.  Hence  he  became  the 
great  head  of  triumphant  humanity.  Tempted  in  all  points  as  we, 
he  shows  how  to  overcome.     We  remark  : 

1.  The  history  implies  in  the  abstract  human  nature  of  Jesus  the 
power  to  sin.  This  is  necessary  in  order  to  a  responsible,  free 
agency.  If  he  had  no  power  to  choose  sin,  it  is  difficult  to  see 
how  he  could  be  tempted  to  a  choice,  not  only  impossible,  but 
consciously  impossible.  If  he  could  not  comply  with  temptation, 
there  could  be  no  danger,  and  truly  no  temptation  at  all.  If  he 
■was  unable  to  comply  with  the  temptation,  there  was  no  virtue  in 
the  non-compliance.  He  was  that  much  no  free  agent ;  his  non- 
compliance was  necessary  and  mechanical,  and  so  non-meritorious. 
The  supposition  that  Christ  could  not  sin  raises  him  above  all 
fitness  to  be  an  example  for  us  as  one  "  tempted  in  all  points  like 
as  we  are,  yet  without  sin."  Propose  such  a  pattern  to  a  fallible 
sinner,  and  he  can  answer  conclusively,  "Make  it  impossible  for 
me  to  sin  and  I  will  be  as  holy  as  he."  None  but  a  free  agent  can 
be  an  example  for  a  free  agent.  Nor  is  any  but  a  free  agent 
capable  of  responsible  probation.  This  free  agency  implies.not, 
indeed,  a  'preferential  sieite  of  soul  for  evil,  as  exists  in  depraved 
man,  but  a  susceptibility,  as  in  the  perfect  first  Adam,  to  impres- 
sions which,  voluntarily  followed  out  to  excess  or  misdirection, 
would  become  sin.  This  view  implies  no  uncertainty  of  his 
accomplishing  our  redemption.  For,  in  full  view  of  all  possibilities, 
the  infinite  wisdom  and  foreknowledge  of  God  had  selected,  for. 
Messiah,  that  being,  of  all  others,  who,  he  foresaw,  would,  with 
perfect  free  will,  prefer  God  to  Satan,  and  in  spite  of  all  temp- 
tation, prove  true  to  his  redemptional  office.  Hence,  while  there 
was  an  intrinsic  possibilit;/  in  the  thing,  there  was  a  full  and 
perfect  certainty  upon  which  the  divine  mind  could  rest,  that  that 
possible  catastrophe  of  his  fall  would  not  take  place. 

2.  In  the  whole  transaction  we  are  to  view  the  Saviour  in  pure 
humanity.  As  he  is  led  by  the  Spirit  to  the  scene,  so  the  blessed 
human  one  stood  sole  and  singular  m  the  universe; — a  pure  lone 
man,  as  the  first  Adam  himself,  leaning,  indeed,  as  every  Christian 
may,  on  the  divine  arm,  yet  as  truly  able  to  fall  by  bis  own  will 
from  all  union  with  God  as  our  first  progenitor,  and  truly  able, 
by  freely  standing,  to  maintain  an  identification  with  God,  impos- 
sible to  the  man  of  Eden. 

Special  commendation  lias  been  bestowed,  and  we  think- 
justly,  on  Dr.  "Whedon'e  exposition  of  our  Lord's  Sermon  on 
the  Mount.     Wo  quote  only   the  plan  or  "skeleton "  of  the 


1S09.1  Wficdon  on  Matthew.  351 

discourse,  which  is  the  result  of  the  commentator's  own  analysis. 
The  topical  arrangement  adopted  is  especially  admirable. 

Plax. 

I.  Christian  Piety,  as  distinguished  feom:  Ieeeligiox.  Chap. 
v,  3-16. 

1.  Nine  benedictions  upon  humility,  penitence,  meekness,  aspira- 
tions after  goodness,  mercy,  purity,  peace-inaking,  and  holy  sufl'er- 
ing  for  righteousness'  sake.  3-12. 

2.  Woes  pronounced  upon  contrary  traits.  Luke  vi,  24-26. 

3.  Active  duties  enjoined  upon  the  blessed  ones.  13-10. 

II.  Chkisti.^  Piety,  as  distinguished  fbom  Judaism.  Chap. 
v,  17;  vi,  10. 

1.  Is  the  completion  of  pure  Judaism.  17-20. 

2.  Distinguished  from  degenerate  Judaism,  in  regard  to  (1.)  an- 
gry passions,  (2.)  sexual  purity,  (3.)  oaths,  (4.)  conciliation,  (5.)  moral 
love,  (0.)  sincerity  in  alms,  prayer,  and  lasting,  v,  20-vi,  IS. 

III.  Christianity,  as  distinguished  peom  Gextilism.  Chap, 
vi,  19-vii,  27. 

1.  Supreme  trust  in  God  our  provident  Father,  vi,  19-34. 

(1.)  The  earth-treasures  must  not  come  into  competition  with 
the  heavenly  treasures.  19-23. 

(2.)  The  world-god  must  not  stand  in  competition  with  our 
heavenly  Father.  24-34. 

2.  Supreme  reverence  for  God  as  our  adjudging  Father,  vii, 
1-27. 

il.)  Usurp  not  Ins  place  as  Judge,  vii,  1-6. 
2.}  Confide  in  his  more  than  earthly  paternity.  7-12. 
3.)  Fnter   the  narrow  way  to  him,  avoiding  all  false  guides. 
13-20. 

(4.^  Profession  no  assurance  before  his  judgment-bar.  21-23. 
(5.)  We  stand  or  fall  in  judgment  only  by  obedience  to  Christ's 
Words.  24-27. 

The  "Plan"  we  believe  to  be  as  correct  as  it  is  simple, 
having  a  genuine  basis  in  the  discourse  itself.  We  add  nothing 
here  of  tlie  comment  proper,  except  the  note  on  the  eighth 
vcr^e  of  the  fifth  chapter. 

Blessed  are  the  pure  in  heart — Here  is  a  trait  of  character 
Which  Grod'fl  Spirit  can  alone  produce.  This  is  sanctilication.  It 
may  exist  in  different  degrees.  Il  may  be  partial ;  it  may  be  com- 
plete. Even  when  complete,  it  may,  in  this  world,  coexist  with 
many  an  error  of  judgment,  and  many  a  defect  of  teraperameut. 
Yet  it  enables  us  to  live  without  offending  God,  so  as  to  maintain 
for  us  the  permanent  undiminished  fullness  of  the  divine  approba- 
tion. And  when  the  heart  is  clean,  the  eye  is  clear.  When  purity 
makes  us  like  God,  then  can  we  realize  and  see  his  countenance. 
The  eye  of  the  pure  spirit  beholds  the  pure  Spirit.     Through  the 


352  Whedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

beams  he  shed  down  upon  us,  we  can  look  up  and  see  the  face  that 
shines.  Jn  the  light  of  his  smi,le  Ave  behold  his  smile.  So  the  pure 
in  heart  shall  see  God. 

It  is,  perhaps,  the  best  service  which  we  can  render  our 
readers,  as  well  as  the  clearest  exhibition  of  the  soundness, 
ability,  and  excellence  of  Dr.  Whedon's  annotations,  to  pre- 
sent, under  appropriate  heads,  some  of  the  doctrinal  views 
which  he  has  set  forth. 

1.  Of  maii* s  fallen  and  depraved  nature. 

As  the  corruption  of  the  tree  lies  back  of  the  evil  fruit,  so  the. 
corruption  of  the  man's  nature  lies  back  of  his  evil  doings.  Cor- 
ruption, depravity,  then,  lies  not,  as  some  teach,  merely  in  the 
actions,  but  in  the  nature  bade  of  the  actions.  Bad  actions  usually 
grow  out  of  a  bad  nature. 

•  More  full,  specific,  and  conclusive  is  the  commentary  on  the 
thirty-third,  thirty-fourth,  and  thirty-fifth  verses  of  the  twelfth 
chapter. 

There  is  a  sort  of  religious  doctrine  which  teaches  that  men  are 
not  depraved  in  their  natures,  but  only  in  their  actions.  Their 
nature  back  of  their  actions,  it  is  claimed,  is  either  innocent  or  it 
is  neutral — neither  good  nor  bad ;  and  all  of  human  depravity 
consists  in  the  fact  that  men  do  freely  act  bad,  and  always  will  do 
so.  Now,  in  opposition  to  this  doctrine,  our  Lord  teaches  that 
there  is  in  men  a  moral  nature  back  of  moral  action  ;  just  as  the 
tree  is  back  of  the  fruit,  just  as  the  fountain  is  back  of  the  stream, 
and  just  as  the  treasury  full  of  good  or  evil  is  drawn  from  by  the 
owner.  It  follows  from  this  fact  of  man's  fallen  moral  nature, 
that  in  order  to  be  pure  in  life  he  must  become  pure  in  heart. 
There  must  be  a  change  in  heart  in  order  that  there  should  be  a 
complete  change  in  moral  action.  This  does  not  indeed  deny  that 
in  individual  acts  (as  in  the  fall  of  the  angels  or  of  man)  their  free 
will  may  choose  wrong  from  a  right  nature.  But  in  their  perma- 
nent history  the  actions  and  the  character  will  conform  to  each 
other. 

Now  no  nature  can  change  itself.  If  the  nature  is  bad,  the  re- 
sulting action  is  bad  ;  and  if  the  action  is  bad,  that  bad  action 
cannot  react  and  make  the  nature  good.  So  that  no  mere  natural 
man  can  regenerate  himself;  that  is,  make  his  own  nature  good 
and  pure.  No  lilt hy  stream  can  make  its  fountain  clean.  No 
corrupt  fruit  can  send  back  a  stream  of  pure  sap  and  regenerate 
the  tree. 

There  must  then  be  a  divine  aid.  A  gracious  power  must  be 
able  to  enter  our  nature,  and  there,  by  power,  make  all  right,  or 
must  communicate  to  the  fallen  nature  the  power  to  perform  those 
conditions  by  which  it  may  come  right.     Fatalism  teaches  that 


1869.]  Wliedon  on  Matthew.  353 

God  by  arbitrary  power  seizes  some  part  of  the  human  race,  and 
absolutely  makes  them  right.  Our  own  Church  teaches  that  God 
rives  the  power  to  all  men  by  his  Holy  Spirit  to  do  works  meet 
for  repentance  ;  that  grace  used  obtains  further  grace  aud  power ; 
bo  that  by  a  gracious  ability,  and  not  by  a  natural  ability,  man 
may  attain  reformation,  regeneration,  and  salvation.  Yet  that 
grace  is  not  irresistible,  nor  necessarily  unresisted,  but  accepted 
and  used  in  action,  with  a  full  power  of  willing  and  acting  other- 
wise instead. 

Tree  corrupt — Moral  corruption  of  nature  lies  to  a  great  degree 
in  the  state  of  the  dispositions.  It  consists  in  a  permanent  temper 
and  purpose  to  indulge  the  appetites,  passions,  and  desires,  with 
little  or  no  regard  to  the  divine  law  or  the  obligations  of  absolute 
right.  Hence  sin  is  either  a  state  or  an  action  which  is  a  trans- 
gretsion  of  the  laic. 

0  generation  of  vipers — Our  Lord  in  the  last  verse  had  used 
these  doctrines  to  show  that  he  was  pure  and  good,  beeause_  his 
actions  were  so.  He  now  turns  upon  his  opponents  to  convince 
them  that  they  were  the  reverse  in  nature,  and  must  be  the  reverse 
in  action.  The  terra  generation  of  vipers  indicates  that  depravity 
is  inborn.  As  the  viper's  nature 'is  derived  by  propagation  from 
ita  original  parents,  so  man's  moi'al  nature  is  derived  from  his  pro- 
genitors. Divine  grace  is  therefore  necessary  as  that  which  by 
nature  we  cannot  have ;  and  a  man  must  as  a  free  agent  use  that 
grace  which  worketh  within  him  both  to  will  aud  to  do.  He  must 
not  receive  the  grace  of  God  in  vain.  JToto  can  ye — They  could 
not  by  mere  nature,  any  more  than  an  Ethiop  can  make  himself 
white.  Experience,  Scripture,  and  reason  teach  this.  God's  grace, 
over  and  above  nature,  must  give  the  power  of  change,  and  man 
must  use  it.  Abundance  of  the  heart — Abundance  of  the  disposi- 
tions back  of  the  will. 

Good  treasure  of  the  heart — A  most  beautiful  expression.  The 
heart  of  a  good  man  is  a  treasure  of  good  things.  Divine  truths, 
blessed  expressions,  spiritual  susceptibilities,  holy  emotions,  dwell 
there  richly,  and  abound.  Like  a  wealthy  banker,  he  has  only  to 
draw  the 'precious  treasure  forth  whenever  occasion  demands. 
Eoil  treasure — But  the  depraved  man  also  has  his  treasury  of  evil 
Hostile  feelings  against  truth  and  goodness,  skeptical  arguments, 
malign  emotions,  purpose  to  prefer  self-interest  to  right,  hatred  of 
^od  and  religion,  are  all  heaped  together,  and  ready  to  furnish  ot 
their  store  whenever  the  occasion  demands. 

2.  Of  God,  the  Father,  the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Ghost 
That  God  is  a  Spirit  is  plentifully  revealed  in  Scripture.  Yet 
this  Spirit  speaks  of  his  Spirit.  Gen.  vi,  3;  lix,  21.  God  sends 
forth  this  his  Spirit.  Prov.  i,  23;  Isa.  xlii,  1.  This  Spirit  thus 
■eat  forth  is  an  agent,  Acts  viii,  20;  x,  10;  and  a  person,  being 
designated  by  a  personal  pronoun.  John  xv,  20.  This  Spirit  is 
associated  with  Father  and  Son  in  the  baptismal  command,  and, 
'ike  the  other  two,  has  his  name  or  personal  appellation.  Matt. 


354  Whedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

xxviii,  IP.  So  llic  same  three  appear  in  the  apostolical  benedic- 
tion. -2  Cor.  xiii,  18.  Here  the  Father  is  the  personal  source  of 
love,  the  Son  of  grace,  and  the  Holy  Spirit  of  communion.  Yet 
God's  Spirit  must  be  divine,  omnipotent,  and  eternal.  God  is  uni- 
versally in  Scripture  declared  to  be  one.  Here,  therefore,  we  find 
that  in  some  one  mysterious  respect  God  is  trine,  and  in  some  Other 
unfathomable  respect  lie  is  one.  Here,  then,  we  have  a  Three-One, 
a  Triune,  a  Trinity.  This  view  of  the  sacred  word  has  been  faith- 
fully held  by  the  faithful  Christian  Church  in  all  ages.  Wherever 
it  is  denied,  rationalism  and  skepticism  are  sure  gradually  to  gain 
the  ascendant,  and  the  Gospel  life  is  lost. 

The  doctrine  of  the  Christian  Church  in  all  ages,  as  derived  from 
the  word  of  God,  is  thus  expressed  in  our  first  Article  of  Faith: 
"There  is  but  one  living  and  true  God,  everlasting,  without  body 
or  parts,  of  infinite  power,  wisdom,  and  goodness  :  the  maker  and 
preserver  of  all  things,  visible  and  invisible.  And  in  unity  of  this 
Godhead  there  are  three  persons,  of  one  substance,  power,  and 
eternity— the  Father,  the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Ghost." 

3.   Of  the  atonement  made  by  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ. 

Sickness,  mortality,  temporal  death,  are  as  truly  a  part  of  the 
great  penalty  of  sin  as  the  very  pains  of  hell  itself.  All  these  were 
borne  by  the  Saviour  in  the  form  of  atoning  sufferings  on  the.  cross. 
It  was  by  this  substitutional  suffering  in  our  stead,  that  the  man 
Ciiri-t  Jesus  was  entitled  to  redeem  us  from  hell,  and  relieve  us 
from  even  the  earthly  part  of  our  woes.  He  healed  sicknesses, 
therefore,  by  bearing  even  them  in  his  own  body  on  the  tree. 

Give  his  life — Even  as  the  Son  of  man  showed  himself  greatest 
of  all  by  the  greatest  sufferings  and  sacrifices  of  all.  Give  his  life 
a  ransom — An  atonement — an  atonement  by  death,  an  atonement 
by  substitution — is  here  briefly  but  powerfully  expressed.  The 
Saviour  will  give  his  life  as  a  ransom  for  the.  souls  of  man}'.  Now 
a  ransom  is  always  a  substitute.  The  price  paid  is  put  in  the  place 
of  the  bondage  of  the  ransomed  person.  If  a  sum  be  paid  to  ran- 
som a  slave,  the  money  goes  to  the  master,  in  the  place  of  the 
slave's  servitude.  If  the  ransom  goes  to  redeem  a  captive,  the 
ransom  is  placed  to  the  conqueror,  in  the  room  of  the  captive.  If 
a  Damon  gives  his  Life  to  ransom  Pythias  from  the  Bcaifbld,  Da- 
mdn's  death  is  the  substitute  for  Fythias's  death.  And  so  if 
Christ's  death  be  given  to  ransom  sinners  from  death,  his  death 
must  be  a  substitute  for  their  death,  lie  dies  in  their  stead.  His 
death  is  temporal,  and  theirs  is  eternal.  So  that  if  they  by  faith 
accept  his  death  in  place  of  their  own,  they  may  be  saved  from 
that  impending  doom. 

AY  inn  our  Lord  proclaimed  the  atonement  finished,  the  stroke  of 
his  power  smote  three  realms:  the  realm  of  grace,  of  nature,  and 
of  death.  In  the  frst,  the  temple's  vail  was  rent,  indieatively  of 
the  departure  of  the  old  dispensation  and  its  nullity  at  the  ap- 
proach of  the  new.  Ill  the  second,  the  earth  was  rent,  indicating 
that  the  same  power  would  destroy  and  renew  again  the  face  of 


1869.1  Whedon  on  Matthew.  355 

nature.  In  the  third,  the  dead  rose  from  their  open  graces,  indi- 
cating that  the  dominion  of  the  destroyer  should  be  destroyed, 
and  the  human  race  be  raised  from  his  power  to  a  complete  resur- 
rection. 

Passover — This  was  the  great  feast  of  the  Jews  in  commemora- 
tion of  their  departure  from  Egypt,  when  the  destroying  angel 
who  cut  olf  the  first-born  of  the  Egyptians  was  made  to  pass  over 
the  residences  of  the  Jews  harmless.  A  victim  was  upon  that 
occasion  slain  by  divine  command,  and  his  blood  stricken  on  the 
two  door-posts  and  upon  the  lintel,  or  top  cross-] >iece,  as  a  sign 
that  the  house  was  the  abode  of  an  Israelite.  See  Exod.  xii,  1-30. 
In  annual  commemoration  of  this  the  following  passover  rites  were 
appointed:  On  the  tenth  day  of  the  month  Nisan,  (corresponding 
nearly  to  our  April,)  a  male  lamb  without  blemish,  of  either  sheep 
or  goats,  was  selected.  It  was  to  be  kept  until  the  fourteenth  day 
of  Nisan,  when  it  was  to  be  slain  by  the  priest  between  the  two 
evenings  of  three  and  six  o'clock,  and  the  blood  was  to  be  poured 
at  the  foot  of  the  great  altar.  At  evening  each  family,  including 
not  less  than  ten  persons,  was  to  eat  the  lamb.  They  were  orig- 
inally commanded  to  do  this  with  all  the  tokens  of  rapid  depart- 
ure. Their  feet  were  to  be  shod,  their  loins  girt,  their  staff  in 
hand,  and  they  were  to  eat,  not  reclining,  but  standing,  and  their 
bread  was  to  be  unleavened,  and  the  whole  was  to  be  done  "  with 
haste."  "Bitter  herbs"  were  to  be  eaten,  as  a  symbol  of  their 
bitter  sufferings  in  Egypt.  Seven  days  were  set  apart  (Exod.  xii, 
15)  as  a  feast  of  unleavened  bread.  The  first  and  last  were  to  be 
days  of  holy  convocation.  The  first  day  commenced  with  the  eve 
on  which  the  paschal  lamb  was  eaten.  In  the  Passion  Week  it 
was  Friday.     See  note  on  verse  5. 

We  here  remark  that  the  victim  was  a  true  vicarious  sacrifice. 
Egypt  for  his  sins  was  punished  by  the  selection  of  a  human  rep- 
resentative, namely,  his  first-born.  Israel  too  was  a  sinner;  but 
he  Buffered  by  substitution  of  the  "lamb  without  spot."  The  pas- 
chal lamb  was  slain,  and  was  to  be,  not  boiled  like  other  sacrifices, 
but  roasted,  to  indicate  by  fire  the  terrible  agonies  of  the  atoning 
victim  ;  and  being  roasted  upon  the  cross  spit,  he  was  literally 
crucified.  The  blood  of  the  first  victim  sprinkled  upon  Israel's 
lintel  is  a  most  remarkable  symbol  of  that  blood  sprinkled  upon 
our  souls,  whereby  God  knows  us  for  his  own,  and  spares  us  when 
he  makes  inquisition  for  blood. 

The  passover  lamb  is  indeed  a  wondrous  type  of  "  the  Lamb  of 
God  thattaketh  away  the  sin  of  the  world  j"  by  whose  sprinkled 
blood  we  are  saved  from  death  and  redeemed  from  spiritual  bond- 
age. It  was  on  the  passover  night  that  our  Lord  instituted  the 
sacrament  as  a  bloodless  continuation  of  the  same  commemoration, 
divested  of  its  special  Jewish  significance.  And  our  Lord  himself 
Was  slain  at  this  very  feast,  which  was  a). pointed  by  Moses  to  pre- 
dict beforehand  his 'death.  On  this  occasion  the  Jews  slew  not 
only  the  typical  victim,  but  the  real  victim  typified  by  their  feasts 
and  sacritices. 


356  Whcdon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

Sorrowful  even  unto  death — Not  sorrowful  in  anticipation  of 
death  ;  but  a  sorrow,  not  his  own,  pressed  so  heavily  and  so 
damply  upon  him,  that  it  would  drown  and  quench  the  spark  of 
life  but  for  the  divine  aid  impregnating  and  strengthening  his 
human  person.  What  sorrow  was  this?  Doubtless  the  Prophet 
Isaiah  (liii,  4)  furnishes  the  true  answer:  "  Surely  he  hath  borne 
our  griefs  and  carried  our  sorrows."  We  do  not  here  find  any 
warrant  for  the  supposition  that  God,  the  Father  Almighty,  poured 
the  thunderbolts  of  personal  anger  on  his  suffering  Son.  But  as 
Christ  suffered  as  a  substitute  for  a  sinful  world,  so  he  did  volun- 
tarily, by  his  own  sad  consent,  encounter  all  the  woe  that  could  be 
inflicted  by  hell  and  earth,  (the  natural  executioners  of  absolute 
justice  under  the  government  of  God,)  and  thus  with  his  infinite 
dignity  do  honor  to  the  law  of  eternal  justice.  And  in  view  of 
this,  having  done  homage  to  justice  in  his  own  person,  he  is  enti- 
tled to  bestow  paradise,  and  confer  righteousness  on  all  who  obe- 
diently accept  him  as  their  substitute  and  Redeemer. 

And  they  crucified  Jam — The  victim  was  nailed  to  the  wooden 
post,  with  his  arms  extended  upon  the  cross  beam,  his  four  limbs 
being  pierced  by  the  spikes.  The  post  sunk  into  the  ground  with 
a  sudden  shock,  producing  an  agonizing  torture.  By  pain,  by  loss 
of  blood,  and  by  mental  suffering,  death  slowly  and  wearily  would 
come.  The  cross  was  a  Roman  mode  of  execution,  reserved  for 
slaves  and  the  vilest  of  the  race,  and  therefore  selected  by  the 
Jews,  although  not  a  Jewish  punishment,  as  a  proof  of  their  con- 
tempt. The  halter  among  us  is  scarce  so  ignominious  a  term  of 
shameful  suffering.  Thence  the  cross  became  in  the  apostolic 
writings  a  symbol,  not  only  of  the  atonement,  but  of  the  offense 
and  contempt  with  which  the  Jews  and  Pagans  viewed  Christian- 
ity. At  the  same  time  it  was  the  symbol  of  the  suffering  fidelity 
with  which  Christians  adhered  to  their  religion.  It  is  now  the 
ensign  of  Christian  nations,  and  is  a  badge  of  Christian  honor.  It 
floa{s  upon  commercial  banners,  and  hangs  upon  the  neck  of 
beauty.  The  Romanists  have  carried  their  reverence  for  the  ma- 
terial and  formal  cross  too  far  ;  but  as  a  visible  symbol  of  Chris- 
tianity it  is  worthy  of  Christian  use,  nor  should  there  be  a  super- 
stitious extreme  in  the  very  act  of  rejecting  the  superstitious  use 
of  the  symbol. 

4.   Of  the  initiatory  rite  of  the  Gosjicl  disjjensation. 

On  the  words,  (chapter  iii,  verse  11,)  "lie  shall  baptize  you 
with  the  Holy  Ghost,  and  with  fire,"  we  have  this  sharp 
analysis,  and  eminently  suggestive  comment: 

This  text  is  the  fundamental  passage  for  showing,  from  the  very 
nature  of  the  rite,  what  is  the  true  mode  of  performing  baptism. 
This  I  have  shown  at  fuller  length  than  is  here  possible,  in  my  two 
sermons  on  The  Double  Baptism,  in  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Pulpit. 
We  may  here  remark:  1.  The  baptism  of  the  Holy  Spirit  was  not 
by  immersion  but  allusion.    At  the  Pentecost,  where  the  Spirit  bap- 


IS69.1  Whedon  on  Matthew.  357 

lisra  was  made  visible,  tlie  tongues  of  fire  descended  and  sat  upon 
'-.„■>,  When  our  Lord  was  baptized  the  Holy  Spirit  descended 
nd  lighted  upon  liiin.  On  Cornelius  and  his  company  it  was 
I  wired  out.  So  Titus  iii,  5,  G.  The  washing  of  regeneration  is 
.•/,•-/  on  us.  Baptism  by  the  Holy  Ghost  is  always  by  affusion. 
2.  If  so,  then  the  word  baptizo,  as  a  religious  rite,  does  not  neces- 
i  trily  or  properly  signify  immersion.  It  is  the  descent  of  the  element 
upon  the  person,  not  of  the  person  into  the  clement.  For  if  baptism 
by  the  clement  spirit  is  affusion,  then  baptism  by  the  element 
water  is  affusion.  The  meaning  of  the  word  is  the  same  whatever 
l.f  the  element. 

ti.  We  have  here  a  principle  of  interpretation.  The  symbol 
ought  always  to  conform  to  and  picture  its  original.  Now,  spirit 
baptism  is  the  original  of  which  water  baptism  is  the  symbol.  If 
spirit  baptism  be  by  affusion,  certainly  water  baptism  must  also  be 
by  affusion.  Spiritual  affusion  cannot  be  symbolized  by  immersion 
in  water.  Hence  immersion  fundamentally  fails  to  be  a  picture  of 
the  original.  It  is  symbol  without  a  reality,  a  shadow  without  a 
substance. 

4.  The  baptism  by  fire  is  a  case  equally  clear.  Its  process  was 
made  visible  at  the  Pentecost,  when  the  fiery  tongues  sat  upon  the 
Apostles.  Baptismal  fire  is  by  affusion;  the  fire  of  hell  is  by  im- 
mersion. So,  verse  10,  the  fruitless  tree  is  cast  into  the  fire.  So, 
Rev.  xx,  15,  cast  into  the  lake  of  fire. 

5.  Of  retribution  in  the  eternal  world. 

On  the  words,  "  He  will  burn  up  the  chaff  with  unquenchable 
fire,"  our  author  says : 

This  epithet  unquenchable  is  decisive  against  Restorationism 
and  against  Destruetionism. 

ftestorationism  teaches  that  the  wicked  will  be  delivered  from 
hell ;  but  this  supposes  the  word  unquenchable  to  be  an  empty 
terror  devoid  of  meaning.  For  to  what  amounts  it  that  the  lire  is 
unquenchable  if  the  sinner  may  be  snatched  from  it  at  any  moment  ? 
what  cares  he  for  the  phantasm  of  a  hell  forever  empty  though 
forever  burning  ?  Moreover,  what  sense  in  supposing  a  hell  forever 
preserved  flaming,  yet  forever  void.  But,  in  fact,  hell  is  the  penal 
condition  of  the  Condemned  sinner,  and  the  fire  the  penal  essence 
Itself ;  hell  has  no  existence  save  as  a  penalty  for  guilt.  Terminate 
the  penalty  and  the  fire  has  gone  out. 

destruetionism  is  the  doctrine  that  the  sinner  ceases,  by  the 
penalty,  to  exist.  So  that  God  still  keeps  an  empty  hell  eternally 
burning!  In  other  words,  this  term  unquenchable  is  unmeaning, 
and  so  essentially  false. 

Of  the  "  furnace  of  fire"  wc  read  as  follows  : 
Blre  is  the  most  usual  form  under  which  penal  retribution  is 
described  in  the  New  Testament.     The  fires  of  the  valley  of  Hin- 
Foir.ni  Series,  Vol.  XXL— 23 


35S  Whedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

nom  were  to  the  Jews  the  emblem  of  future  penalty.  Hence  the 
burning  flame  is  the  ordinary  symbol  of  hell.  And  if  there  be  not 
in  the  world  of  retribution  a  real  material  lire,  yet  what  fire  is  to 
the  body  that  the  element  of  hell  will  doubtless  be  to  the  soul  and 
to  the  immortal  resurrection  body. 

This  is  the  comment  on  chapter  x,  verse  28 : 

Tear  not  them  which  kill  the  body — Neither  miraculous  power 
nor  divine  promise  insures  the  Apostles  against  bodily  harm  or 
bodily  death.  But  they  are  enjoined  to  possess  a  superiority  to 
fear  of  these  corporeal  injuries.  And  in  these  words  is  the  primal 
source  of  the  martyr  spirit.  It  is  courage  founded  on  faith. 
Body  .  .  .  soul — We  have  here  the  two  parts  of  man's  compound 
nature  placed  in  contrast.  They  are  two  separate  things.  The 
body  is  not  the  soul.  The  soul  is  not  the  body.  This  is  dem- 
onstrably the  doctrine  of  the  text.  Them  which  hill  the  bod;/, 
bat  are  not  able  to  hill  the  soul — From  these  words,  it  follows  that 
the  body  may  be  dead,  and  the  soul  alive.  Men  can  murder  the 
body,  they  can  extinguish  its  corporeal  life.  They  may  burn  it  to 
ashes,  and  scatter  its  particles  to  the  four  winds.  Yet  stilt  the  soul 
is  alive.  No  blows  can  murder  it,  no  tire  can  bum  it,  no  water  drown 
or  quench  it.  Nothing  less  than  this  can  be  the  meaning  of  the  text, 
and  against  the  text  no  materialism  can  stand.  JJut  rather  f  at 
him — Namely,  God.  Fear,  then,  and  fear  as  the  dread  of  punish- 
ment, is  a  right  and  suitable  feeling.  And  those  who  say  that 
such  a  feeling  is  too  base  to  be  indulged,  are  contradicted  by  this 
text.  And  those  who  deny  any  punishment  from  God  after  the 
death  of  the  body,  contradict  these  words  of  Christ.  To  destroy 
both  soul  and  body — The  Lord  does  not  say  hill  both  soul  and 
body.  To  destroy  is  not  to  kill,  still  less  to  annihilate,  but  to  ruin. 
Our  Lord's  words  teach,  not  the  dismissal  of  the  soul  from  exist- 
ence, but  its  catastrophe  and  ruin  in  existence.  And  this  is  an  evil, 
a  destruction,  which  we  are  bound  to  fear,  as  a  possible  reality 
beyond  our  bodily  death.  In  hell — In  Gehenna.  This  word  Ge- 
henna, or  Valley  of  Hinnom,  in  its  primitive  and  literal  sense, 
designated  a  gorge  south  of  Jerusalem,  otherwise  called  Tophet, 
where  the  offals  of  the  city  were  ordinarily  burned.  i\s  a  place  of 
defilement  and  perpetual  lire,  it  became  to  the  Jewish  mind  the 
emblem,  and  the  word  became  the  name,  of  the  perpetual  fire  of 
retribution  in  a  world  to  come.  Hence,  loose  reasoners  have 
endeavored  to  maintain  that  this  valley  was  the  only  hell.  And 
upon  this  sophism  the  heresy  of  Univei  salism  is  mainly  founded. 
But  the  present  text  demonstrates  that  beyond  the  death  of  the 
body,  ami  therefore  in  a  future  state,  there  is  a  hell  or  Gehenna, 
which  the  soul  may  suffer,  more  terrible  than  bodily  death,  and 
more  to  be  feared  than  any  evil  thai  man  can  inflict.  God  is  the 
author  of  that  evil ;  it  lies  beyond  death,  it  is  executed  upon  the 
soul  as  well  as  the  body.  No  plausible  interpretation  can  expel 
these  meanings  from  this  text. 


1869J  Whcdon  on  Matthew.  859 

Eqnally  significant  is  the  note  on  the  4:6th  verse,  chap,  xxy: 

And  these  shall  go  away — Millenarians,  "who  hold  that  the 
righteous  are  raised  from  the  dead  at  a  first  resurrection  one 
thousand  years  before  the  resurrection  of  the  wicked  ut  a  second 
resurrection,  are  unable  to  explain  this  entire  scene  of  judgment. 
Here  at  our  Lord's  next  advent,  at  an  unknown  distance,  stand  the 
righteous  and  the  wicked  at  once  before  his  bar,  listen  in  common 
to  each  other's  trial  and  sentence  before  either  pass  to  their  final 
doom.  The  ordinary  subterfuge  is  to  say  that  this  judgment  Clar- 
is a  thousand  years 'long.  For.  this  there  is  no  support  in  the 
passage.  Besides,  by  their  view  the  righteous  ought  to  be  ac- 
quitted and  glorified  for  a  millennial  kingdom  before  the  wicked  are 
tried,  or  even  raised  from  the  dead.  Whereas,  by  this  whole 
description  the  wicked  are  raised,  adjudged,  and  condemned 
before  the  righteous  enter  at  all  upon  their  reward. 

Everlasting  punishment  .  .  .  life  eternal. — The  words  everlasting 
and  eternal  are  here  in  the  original  precisely  the  same  word,  and 
should  have  been  so  translated.  Hence  the  duration  of  the  penalty 
of  the  wicked  is  defined  by  the  same  measurement  as  the  duration 
of  the  reward  of  the  righteous.  One  is  just  as  long  as  the  other. 
The  pillars  of  heaven  are  no  firmer  than  the  foundations  of  hell. 
The  celestial  nature  of  saint  and  angels  is  no  more  immutable  than 
the  infernal  nature  of  devils  and  sinners.  And  since  the  word  used 
is  the  most  expressive  of  perpetuity  that  the  Greek  affords,  so  we 
have  the  strongest  assurance  here  that  language  can  afford.  And 
since  the  term  is  used  as  a  measurement  of  divine  duration,  we 
may  well  infer  that  the  foundations  both  of  the  divine  rewards  and 
the  divine  penalties  are  as  perpetual  as  the  foundation  of  the  divine 
government.  Clouds  and  darkness  are  indeed  round  about  him ; 
righteousness  and  justice  are  the  basis  of  his  throne. 

The  word  aiwv  (we  may  suggest  to  scholars)  is  not  derived,  as 
Dr.  Clarke  (quoting  Aristotle)  asserts,  from  aet,  always^  and  wv, 
existing  ;  for  cov  is  but  the  noun  termination  added  to  dei.  This 
noun  termination  is  equivalent  to  the  Latin  termination  urn  ;  so 
that  the  Latin  cevum  is  (with  a  digamma  inserted)  the  same  word 
as  ai&v.  The  Latin  word  cevum  is  the  came  as  our  word  ever,  so 
that  the  Greek  tig  auova  is  precisely  forever.  By  adding  the 
adjective  termination  ernus  to  ad  we  have  (inserting  a  strengthen- 
ing t)  (btermis,  eternal.  So  that  ai&v^  ever,  and  eternal^  are  etymo- 
logical equivalents. 

C  Of  faith  in  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ  as  the  instrument  of 
our  salvation. 

On  the  words,  "And  Jesus  said  unto  them,  Because  of  your 
unbelief:  for  verily  I  say  unto  you,  If  ye  have  faith  as  a  grain 
of  mustard  seed,  ye  shall  say  unto  this  mountain,  J I  'move 
hence  to  yonder  place;  and  it  shall  remove,"  Dr.  "Wliedon 
observes : 


360  Whedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

-  This  faith,  be  it  remembered,  supposes  a  concurrence  between 
God  and  man.  On  the  part  of  God  a  mission  or  duty  assigned  to 
the  man,  for  which  the  power  of  faith  is  granted;  and  without 
this,  the  true  faitli  is  impossible.  On  the  part  of  man  there  must 
be  exercised  all  the  granted  faith-power,  by  which  he  puts  forth 
the  net,  or  pursues  the  course  which  is  opened  in  the  way  of  duty 
before  him.  When  these  two  things  combine,  it  is  literally  true 
that  any  thing  is  'possible.  If  the  man's  mission  be  to  remove  the 
Audes  into  the  Pacific  it  can  be  done.  If  there  be  no  duty  to  it, 
there  can  be  no  true  faith  for  it ;  and  the  attempt  to  do  it  would 
not  he  faith  but  rash  self-will.  God  gives  no  man  faith  wherewith 
to  play  miraculous  pranks.  On  the  other  hand,  if  there  be  the 
duty  and  the  God-given  power  of  faith,  and  yet  it  be  not  exercised 
with  the  full  strength  of  heart  and  the  firm  trust  in  God  which 
knows  the  impossibility  will  be  done,  no  miracle  shall  follow. 
This  the  disciples  had  not,  even  to  a  mustard  seed's  amount ;  and 
a  mustard  seed's  amount  could  have  as  easily  accomplished  its 
mission  as  my  hand  moves  a  pen.  There  doubtless  lives  many  a 
Christian  now  with  faith  sufficient  to  remove  real  material  mount- 
ains, if  God  had  any  such  work  for  him  to  do.  Yet  it  may  be 
safely  presumed  that  our  Lord  used  the  word  mountain  as  well  as 
the  mustard  seed  by  way  of  figure.  He  may  have  used  it  as 
Isaiah,  xl,  4,  prophesies  that  "  every  valley  shall  be  exalted,  and 
every  mountain  shall  be  brought  low."  Or  as  Zechariah,  iv,  7,  de- 
clares that  the  "  great  mountain  shall  disappear  before  Zerub- 
babel." 

Those  beautiful  words,  "  And  whosoever  shall  give  to  drink 
unto  one  of  these  little  ones  a  cup  of  cold  water  only  in  the 
name  of  a  disciple,  verily  I  say  unto  you,  be  shall  in  no  wise 
lose  his  reward,"  are  the  occasion  of  the  following  exquisite 
note  : 

One  of  these  little  o?tcs — A  tender  appellation  for  his  Apostles. 
They  were  shetp  in  the  midst  of  wolves,  they  were  harmless  like 
doves,  they  were  tender  like  little  ones.  A  ciqy  of  cold  water  only 
in  the  name  of  a  disciple. — In  the  glowing  climate  of  Palestine, 
the  pursued  and  persecuted  apostle  might  iind  a  cup  of  cold 
water  the  preservation  of  his  lite.  And  whosoever,  in  recognition 
of  his  discipleship,  that  is,  because  he  was  a  disciple  of  Jesus,  and 
from  love  to  his  Master,  shall  furnish  him  this  precious  boon, 
shall  in  no  wise  lose  his  reward.  His  faith  has  worked  by  love, 
and  has  been  justified  by  works. 

Here,  therefore,  is  no  shadow  of  a  denial  of  the  doctrine  of  justi- 
fication by  faith;  but  an  assertion  that  works  in  faith  are  gra- 
ciously rewarded  of  God.  And  in  such  faith  the  slightest  work,  the 
simplest  cup  of  cold  Mater,  is  a  noble  investment  for  a  great 
reward. 

It  is  said  that  in  India  the  Hindoos  go  often  a  great  distance 
for  water,  boil  it  to  render  it  healthful,  and  then,  in  honor  of  some 


J -00.3  Whedon  on  Matthew.  361 

i,lo!,  stand  by  the  road-side  until  night  offering  drink  to  travelers. 
Such  an  act  of  faith  in  Christ  performed  for  his  apostles  cannot 
fail  of  its  reward. 

According  to  your  faith — So  that  the  measure  of  faith  which 
voa  have  shall  be  exactly  justified,  sustained,  and  rewarded.  Thus 
faith  is  a  readiness  to  receive  of  God.  Though  it  has  no  merit  to 
deserve  a  reward,  yet  it  is  the  right  state  of  soul  to  receive  God's 
truth  and  mercy. 

But  we  cannot  proceed  in  this  fashion.  There  is  a  limit  to 
all  tilings,  and  there  must  be  to  these,  quotations,  choice  and 
tempting  as  they  are.  We  had  purposed  to  give  specimen 
comments  on  repentance,  on  prayer,  on  the  doctrine  of  Provi- 
dence, on  the  inspiration  and  truth  of  the  Scriptures,  on  the 
ten  specimen  miracles,  on  Christian  character,  on  the  kingdom 
of  Jesus,  on  the  great  commission,  on  the  law  of  the  Sabbath, 
on  the  interpretation  of  parables,  on  the  transfiguration,  on 
the  family  relation,  on  human  ability,  on  the  Church,  on  the 
resurrection,  and  on  the  events  of  passion  week  and  the 
glorious  fruits  of  our  redemption  in  Jesus  Christ ;  but  we  can 
do  no  more  than  make  this  enumeration  of  themes  from  which 
we  reluctantly  turn.  The  statement  of  these  topics,  however, 
may  suffice  to  show  how  comprehensive  is  this  commentary, 
and  what  a*  variety  of  interesting  and  important  doctrines  it 
presents  for  our  consideration.  We  earnestly  advise  every 
reader  to  study,  in  the  pages  of  Dr.  Whedon,  these  enumer- 
ated topics  for  himself. 

But  there  is  one  portion  of  this  commentary  which  we  can- 
not pass  over  in  silence.  The  twenty-fourth  chapter  of  Mat- 
thew has  always  been  to  us  a  profound  enigma.  We  must  say 
that  we  regard  Dr.  Whedon's  treatment  of  it  as  eminently 
satisfactory.  We  have  read  much  larger  works  on  this  part  of 
Holy  Writ  with  much  less  profit.  While  there  may  be,  in  the 
1 'articular  comments,  erroneous  views  and  statements,  we  are 
convinced  that  the  general  exposition  and  argument  are  sub- 
stantially correct.  Let  any  student  of  God's  word  go  through 
the  twenty-fourth  and  twenty-fifth  chapters  of  Matthew  with 
this  plan  of  interpretation  in  his  hand,  and  see  if  many  things 
fchich  were  in  the  mists  and  shadows  do  not  come  distinctly 
forth  into  the  light  as  at  the  break  of  day. 

We  have  spoken  of  Dr.  Whedon's  definitions  as  accurate 
and  argumentative;  and  we  ought,  perhaps,  in  justice,  to  add 


362  Wftedon  on  Matthew.  [July, 

that  many  of  his  descriptions  are  word-paintings  of  exqnisite 
beauty  and  purity.  We  quote  two  or  three,  selected  almost  at 
random,  as  illustrations  of  our  statement. 

In  one'!  k'tely  Ms  lc2~>rosy  teas  cleansed — How  sweet  must  have 
been  the  sensations  of  renewing  health  and  wholeness.  The 
crumbling  limbs  renew  their  shape,  the  blood  flows  quickly 
through  the  system,  the  eye  recovers  its  brightness,  and  the  voice 
its  music.  He  stands  up  once  more  in  Iris  pure,  vigorous  man- 
hood; and  scarce  can  he  wait  the  Lord's  commands,  before  he  must 
rush  through  the  country,  a  living  wonder,  to  tell  the  story  of  his 
salvation. 

Outer  darkness — The  figure  of  a  banquet  is  carried  out.  The 
splendor,  the  joy,  the  society,  the  feast  within,  are  an  emblem  of 
God's  kingdom  below  and  above.  The  darkness  of  the  streets 
without  is  an  emblem  of  deep  horror.  The  streets  of  Eastern 
cities  are  narrow  and  filthy;  all  the  outdoor  comfort  being  re- 
served for  the  court  or  square  yard  inclosed  within  the  area  of  the 
building.  At  night  they  are  totally  dark,  being  unillumined  even 
by  rays  from  a  window.  Robbers  and  ferocious  dogs  render  them 
dangerous.  We  have  thence  a  strong  image  of  that  utter  despair, 
darkness,  and  death  of  a  soul  excluded  from  God,  and  left  to 
weeping  and  (masking  of  teeth. 

Come  unto  me — JJe,  the  very  me,  to  whom  John  has  lately  sent 
his  message,  Art  thou  He,  or  look  we  for  another?  Yet  the  very 
me  who  am  the  revealer  (verse  27)  of  God  to  man.  The  very  me 
who  exists  in  ineffable  unity  with  God  the  Father  Almighty — this 
person  now  stands  as  in  the  center  of  a  laboring,  laden,  oppressed 
world,  and  sends  his  piercing,  mellow,  tender  voice  to  all  the 
suffering  sons  of  sorrow  to  escape  all  bondage  by  entering  his  bonds. 

In  the  extremity  of  his  physical  pain  the  Son  of  man  must  en- 
dure the  utmost  that  human  contempt  can  think- and  say  and  do. 
The  accidental  spectator,  the  chance  specimens  of  our  race;  the 
chief  priests,  the  representatives  of  rank,  sacred  and  secular,  are 
present.  The  powerful  exert  the  uttermost  of  their  power,  and 
the  vilest  do  their  best  and  vilest.  They  utter  taunts  founded  on 
calumnious  misrepresentations  of  his  words;  they  ridicule  his 
kingship,  and  even  his  piety.  They  trample  on  his  pretenses,  and 
exult  over  his  weakness. 

A  painter  with  only  the  skill  of  a  copyist,  putting  these  on 
the  eanvas3,  would  make  pictures  of  such  power  that  the  ages 
would  not  suffer  them  to  perish.  Let  us  label  them  The 
Cleansed  Zejyer,  The  Outer  Darkness,  The  Pitying  //• 
The  Dying  Saviour.  What  subjects  for  an  artist!  What 
themes  for  a  preacher  ! 

Another  peculiarity  of  Dr.  Whedon  is  pithy,  pungent  utter- 
ances  which  have  the  force  of  proverbs.      They   are  strewn 


]  569.]  Whedon  on  Matthew.  3G3 

tlirough  his  commentary  like  sands  of  gold.  If  collected  and 
fused,  what  precious  ingots  they  would  form.  We  append  a 
few  examples : 

While  no  man  can  regenerate  himself,  every  man  may,  at 
proper  will,  attain  regeneration  from  God. 

Better  ejo  to  heaven  maimed,  than  to  hell  -whole. 

Affections  and  lusts  for  forbidden  objects  must  be  sacrificed  at 
whatever  expense  of  feeling. 

The  yoke  of  Christ  is  freedom.  The  service  of  God  is  the  high- 
est and  truest  liberty.  The  laws  of  God  are  the  laws  of  our  highest 
nature;  and  he  who  comes  under  those  laws  docs  but  do  what  is 
fittest,  rightest,  most  happy,  and  most  highly  natural  for  him. 
When  Christ  gives  his  law,  lie  gives  a  heart  and  a  pleasure  to 
keep  that  law,  so  that  he  who  obeys  it  does  as  lie  pleases. 

It  is  a  poor  piety  that  attempts  to  be  a  substitute  for  virtue. 

"Thy  will  be  done"  limits  not  only  all  murmur,  but  all  prayer. 

The  Scriptures  teach  self-denial,  but  they  do  not  teach  self-anni- 
hilation.   They  forbid  selfishness,  but  they  do  not  forbid  self-love. 

The  true,  martyr  never  sought  death  ;  never  made  a  display  of 
heroism ;  and  never  failed  when,  reposing  faith  in  Christ,  he 
meekly  suffered  for  his  name. 

The  clearness  of  the  light  against  which  sin  is  committed  ag- 
gravates the  guilt. 

If  persecutions  must  be  suffered,  to  suffer  is  reasonable,  it  is  safe, 
it  attains  a  reward. 

A  neglect  of  preparation  for  the  pulpit  is  carelessness  ;  an  avoid- 
ance of  it  under  the  expectation  of  inspiration  is  fanaticism.  Xo 
doubt  a  divine  influence  attends  a  faithful  administration  of  the 
word,  but  not  so  as  to  supersede  the  best  and  fullest  exertion  of 
the  human  faculties. 

A  faithless  Church  restrains  the  convicting  and  converting 
Spirit.     Unbelief  defeats  omnipotence. 

There  would  be  less  skepticism  if  men's  hearts  were  as  pure  as 
the  evidences  of  religion  are  clear. 

Your  anxiety  is  just  so  much  belief  that  wealth  is  safer  than 
God,  and  Mammon  a  better  master  than  Christ. 

Mammon  is  the  supreme  dollar  of  the  day. 

Ifreligion.be  worth  any  thing,  it  is  worth  every  thing. 

As  Christ  is  a  universal  Saviour,  so  his  Gospel  is  framed  to  be  a 
universal  Gospel,  and  his  religion  a  universal  religion.  It  knows 
no  distinction  of  race,  clime,  or  color.  It  belongs  to  man,  and 
hoHs  that  humanity  is  a  unit  ;  and  claiming  to  be  a  blessin 
all,  and  to  possess  a  right  over  all,  it  designs  to  spread  that  bless- 
ing and  assert  that  right. 

God  gives  men  a  chance  to  labor,  not  because  he  need.-,  their 
Work,  but  because  they  need  his  reward. 

There  cannot  be  a*  permanent  contrariety  between  a  moral 
agent's  moral  actions  and  his  moral  dispositions. 

The  great  crucified  leader  is  followed  by  an  endless  train  of 


364  Whedon  on  Matthew.  tJuly, 

crucified  followers.  They  arc  crucified  symbolically,  iu  all  their 
Sufferings  of  mind  or  body,  in  behalf  of  Christ  and  of  truth.  Each 
follower' who  hath  the  spirit  of  his  Master,  is  crucified  in  fact  or  in 
readiness  of  spirit.     The  Spirit  of  Christ  is  the  spirit  of  martyrdom. 

Few  are  so  mean  but  they  fancy  there  is  somebody  below  them. 

The  being  who  is  elevated  enough  to  have  a  true  immortal  God 
to  he  his  Cod,  must  himself  be  neither  the  creature  of  time  nor 
annihilation. 

Many  retain  a  sort  of  ecclesiastical  conscience  while  committing 
the  grossest  immoralities. 

No  man  is  bo  safe  as  the  child  of  God.  No  man  is  bound  to  be 
so  cheerful.  If  he  rise  iuto  the  true  position  of  the  man  of  faith, 
no  one  can  be  so  fearless,  so  brave,  so  generous,  so  patient,  so 
manly.     Buoyancy  is  with  him  a  duty,  and  despondency  is  a  sin. 

Adversities  and  prosperities  may  both  be  enemies  to  our  soul. 
Some  become  soured  by  trouble,  and  their  time  is  so  engrossed 
that  they  have  no  heart,  no  room  for  the  service  of  God.  Others 
become  wealthy  and  proud  ;  too  fine  and  too  fashionable  to  be  pious. 

The  general  typographical  execution  is  superior  ;  but  some 
errors  have  escaped  the  eye  of  the  proof  reader,  and  some  blem- 
ishes and  repetitions  the  keener  eye  of  the  author.  For  in- 
stance, the  dying  cry  of  Julian  the  Apostate,  "  Thou  hast 
conquered,  O  Galilean  !  "  which  is  quoted  on  page  222,  ap- 
pears again  on  page  357.  This  is  doubtless  an- oversight.  In 
the  note  on  the  twenty-eighth  verse  of  the  sixteenth  chapter, 
Dr.  Whedon  says:  "  Our  Lord's  'coming in  his  kingdom*  was 
when  lie  came  from  Paradise  to  resume  his  body,  now  glori- 
fied," etc  AVas  his  body  then  glorified?  Was  it  in  his  glori- 
fied body  that  our  Lord  appeared  to  his  disciples,  eating  with 
them,  showing  them  his  "flesh  and  bones,"  "his  hands  and 
his  feet,"  and  abiding  with  them  forty  days?  In  another 
place,  page  3-10,  Dr.  Whedon  says,  "  It  is  very  probable  that 
the  splendor  of  a  glorified  body  is  always  sufficient  to  over- 
whelm the  senses  and  prostrate  the  strength  of  a  living 
mortal."  If  "  the  body  of  Jesus  rose,  in  possession  of  super- 
natural qualities  belonging  to  a  resurrection  body,"  as  our 
author  elsewhere  asserts,  does  that  fact  justify  the  appellation 
"glorified?"  Every  mortal  production  falls  somewhat  below 
the  ideal  perfection  ;  but  there  is  scarcely  enough  of  deficiency 
or  error  in  this  commentary  to  shade  the  picture,  or  temper 
the  light  to  our  vision.  Fortunately  for  us,  it  is  the  pure,  ever 
grateful  light  of  God's  inspired  truth. 

We  have  in  this  article  restricted   our  observations  to  the 


1SC9.1  Whcdon  on  Matthew.  305 

Jfotcs  on  Matthew,  but  we  could  speak  in  like  commendatory 
.-trains  of  the  whole  commentary  on  the  four  Gospels.  The 
"  great  Lukean  section,"  embracing  what  is  peculiar  to  that 
Evangelist,  is  unfolded  with  special  clearness  and  power.  And 
no  one  has  entered  more  fully  than  Dr.  Whedon  into  the 
tender  and  loving  feelings  of  John,  his  intense  spirituality,  and 
his  profound  reverence  and  affection  for  the  divine  Son  of 
God. 

These  volumes  ought  to  be  in  every  minister's  library,  and 
among  the  few  well-chosen  books  in  every  intelligent  Chris- 
tian household. 

"We  sincerely  hope  that  the  author  may  be  spared  life  and 
health  "  to  complete,"  according  to  his  purpose,  "  an  entire 
exposition  of  the  2sew  Testament  in  the  same  style  and  pro- 
portional extent,"  It  will  be  a  good  service  to  our  holy 
Christianity,  to  the  cause  of  sound  biblical  criticism,  and  to 
our  Saxon-English  speech.  Such  a  work,  we  may  add,  em- 
bracing the  result  of  modern  scholarship,  yet  popular  in  its 
style  and  compressed  in  form,  will,  beyond  all  question,  be 
accepted  by  the  Church  and  public  as  fulfilling,  in  large 
measure,  the  blessed  mission  of  diffusing  God's  word  and 
"spreading  scriptural  holiness." 


Art.  IV.— WHITE'S  MASSACRE  OF  ST.  BARTHOLOMEW. 

The  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  Preceded  by  a  History  of  the  Religion.*  AVars 
In  the  Reign  of  Charles  IX.  By  Henry  White.  Anieiieau  Edition.  Now 
York :  Harper  k  Brothers.     1SCS. 

The  study  of  the  causes  and  effects  of  great  national  crimes  is 
one  of  the  most  instructive  that  can  engage  the  attention  of  a 
thoughtful  man.  However  uncertain  or  incomprehensible  the 
course  of  ordinary  events  may  at  times  appear  to  our  defective 
vision— whatever  pauses,  and  even  retrogressions,  the  majority  of 
the  orbs  in  our  firmament  may  make— there  is  no  6uch  difficulty 
with  regard  to  these.  They  arc  the  flaming  meteors  that  mark 
out  their  distinct  and  well-defined  paths,  leaving  us  in  no  donbl 
whence  they  came  and  whither  they  tend.  \i'  in  the  case  of 
the.   less   flagrant  violations  of  the  divine  laws  on  the  part  of 


366  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [Julj, 

great  communities  of  men  it  is  not  always  easy  to  point  to  the 
particular  punishment  meted  out  for  each  offense,  the  retribu- 
tion that  follows  the  commission  of  these  atrocities  is  generally 
so  prompt  and  unmistakable  as  to  vindicate  the  justice  of  God 
even  in  the  estimation  of  the  skeptic  and  the  scoffer.  And, 
for  this  reason,  the  contemplation  of  the  class  of  phenomena  of 
which  we  speak  is  exempt  from  the  demoralizing  effects  flow- 
ing from  habitual  familiarity  with  the  annals  of  individual  and 
personal  crime.  Vice  does  not  attract,  when  its  terrible  con- 
sequences to  the  perpetrator  can  be  seen  written  in  characters 
of  light  ;  and  the  perpetrator  himself  stands  as  a  beacon  of 
warning  to  those  who  would  copy  his  example  of  successful 
wrong- doing. 

[Nearly  three  hundred  years  ago  Christendom  was  startled 
by  the  tidings  of  the  commission  of  a  stupendous  crime  which 
seemed  to  throw  into  the  shade  every  similar,  but  less  gigantic, 
deed  of  blood.  A  scheme  of  midnight  assassination  had  been 
carried  into  execution,  whose  victims  were  not  solitary  men, 
but  were  to  be  counted  by  tens  of  thousands;  which  was  not 
confined  to  a  single  neighborhood,  nor  even  to  a  single  city,  but, 
commencing  with  one  of  the  most  populous  capitals  of  Europe, 
extended  to  the  utmost  limits  of  the  realm  :  a  massacre  for 
which  its  authors  manifested  no  shame  or  compunction,  which 
they  exultingly  avowed,  which,  with  hands  yet  reeking  with 
human  blood,  they  magnified  as  an  act  of  extraordinary  justice 
and  piety,  upon  which  they  invoked,  and  for  which  they 
obtained,  the  unhesitating  approval  and  benediction  of  the 
head  of  their  religion,  and  a  self-styled  vicegerent  of  God  on 
earth.  When  we  add,  that  the  person  under  whose  authority 
this  carnival  of  blood  was  celebrated  was  the  monarch  himself, 
that,  he  was  instigated  by  a  woman — his  mother— that  the  suf- 
ferers were  the  most  virtuous,  and  among  the  most  exalted  in 
rank  of  all  his  subjects,  that  not  only  was  the  deed  consum- 
mated in  a  time  of  profound  peace,  but  the  occasion  selected 
was  that  of  the  festivities  attending  the  marriage  of  that  king's 
sister,  of  that  mother's  daughter,  to  the  recognized  head  of  the 
party  that  was  to  be  exterminated  from  the  face  of  the  earth, 
and  that  the  revolting  scenes  of  inhuman  ferocity,  so  far  from 
being  confined  to  obscure  neighborhoods  or  distant  quarters  of 
the  city,  were  enacted  in  the  courts  and  corridors  of  the  palace, 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  3G7 

bv  the  side  of  the  young  bride,  whose  very  bedchamber  afforded 
an  uncertain  refuge  to  a  single  wretch  escaping  from  the  hands 
of  his  pursuers,  we  have  before  us  a  few  of  the  circumstances 
that  account  for  the  undiminished  interest  which  the  recital  of 
the  events  of  the  massacre  that  began  on  the  morning  of  Sun- 
day, August  24-th,  1572,  continues  to  elicit. 

While  the  general  incidents  of  this  lamentable  occurrence 
are  well  known  and  settled  beyond  the  possibility  of  cavil,  there 
is  not  a  little  uncertainty  attaching  to  the  current  accounts  in 
a  number  of  particulars.  But  more  important  than  any  or  all 
of  these,  is  the  question  whether  the  massacre  itself  should  be 
regarded  as  the  result  of  a  plot  of  long  standing,  perfected  in 
all  its  essential  features  many  months  or  years  before,  with 
whose  existence  the  King  of  Spain  and  the  Pope  of  Home  were 
acquainted,  if  they  did  not  create  it,  and  which,  by  a  miracle 
of  dissimulation,  was  kept  secret,  by  the  large  number  of  per- 
sons to  whom  it  had  been  confided  ;  or  whether,  on  the  con- 
trary, the  execution  bears  the  unmistakable  impress  of  having 
been  the  result  of  a  sudden  and  almost  frantic  determination  to 
extricate  its  authors  from  new  and  dangerous  complications. 

In  the  work,  the  title  of  which  we  have  placed  at  the  com- 
mencement of  this  article,  Mr.  Henry  White  has  not  merely 
undertaken  to  solve  this  important  problem,  but  prepares  the 
way  for  a  clearer  understanding  of  an  eventful  period  by  re- 
lating, with  considerable  detail,  the  transactions  of  the 
iirst  three  civil  wars.  Indeed,  since  he  prefaces  his  work 
with  a  rapid  sketch  of  the  progress  of  the  Reformation  in 
France  during  the  reigns  of  Francis  I.,  Henry  II.,  and  Fran- 
cis II.,  he  has  given  a  continued  narrative  of  the  history  of  the 
Huguenots,  from  their  origin  to  the  death  of  Charles  IX.  It 
is  not  too  much  to  say  that  he  has  made  a  book  whieh  is  far  in 
advance  of  any  thing  which  we  previously  possessed  on  this 
subject  in  the  English  language.  The  truth  is,  that  we  have 
until  now  had  little  or  nothing  deserving  the  name  of  a  history 
of  the  brave  Protestants  of  France.  Mr.  Browning's  work,* 
indeed,  met  with  remarkable  suceess,  and  we  believe  was,  at 
the  time  of  its  publication,  forty  years  since,  eulogized  by  the 

*  The  History  of  the  Huguenot*  during  the  Sixteenth  Century,  by  W.  S.  Browfr 
''>£.  Two  volumes.  London:  1S29.  History  of  tbo  Huguenots,  from  lo'Jd  to 
1838,  by  the  same.    One  volume.    Paris:  18L:0. 


308  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July. 

Gentleman's  Magazine  as  "one  of  the  most  interesting  and 
valuable  contributions  to  modern  history."  But,  not  to  speak 
of  the  defects  of  style,  it  is  not  unfrequently  superficial,  and 
sometimes  inaccurate.  At  best,  it  contains  only  a  record  of  the 
civil  wars  of  the  Huguenots — by  no  means  the  most  precious 
part  of  the  legacy  left  us  by  that  race  of  sturdy  champions  of 
the  truth.  Eejecting  the  idea  of  writing  any  thing  that  might 
seem  to  approach  a  martyrology,  the  author  made  little  use  of 
even  that  scanty  fund  of  materials  for  the  composition  of  a 
history  of  the  origin  of  the  French  Reformation  which  was 
then  accessible.  Professor  I)e  Felice's  "  Protestants  of  France," 
although  free  from  the  last  mentioned  defect,  and  sufficiently 
full  on  that  portion  of  Huguenot  history  on  which  recent  inves- 
tigation has  thrown  so  much  light,  has  the  disadvantage  of 
having  been  written  originally  as  a  purely  popular  work,  and 
of  having  been  subsequently  enlarged  in  its  scope.  It  is  based 
on  no  exhaustive  investigation.  Besides,  the  translation  of  Dr. 
Lobdell,  through  which  it  is  exclusively  known  in  this  country, 
is  very  imperfectly  executed,  and  preserves  so  many  French 
idioms  as  to  be  frequently  obscure,  and  rarely  forcible  or 
elegant. 

Mr.  White's  volume,  on  the  contrary,  is  not  only  well  writ- 
ten, but  exhibits  on  every  page  the  results  of  extensive  reading, 
laborious  research,  and  judicious  weighing  and  comparison  of 
authorities.  He  has  evidently  given  a  good  share  of  his  atten- 
tion to  the  writers  of  the  sixteenth  century,  upon  whose 
memoirs  and  histories  our  information  must,  after  all,  chiefly 
be  based.  No  study  of  later  compilations — not  even  the  exam- 
ination of  municipal  records  or  contemporary  letters — could 
supply  the  place  of  the  invaluable  guidance  of  La  Place  and 
La  Planche,  of  Jean  de  Scrres,  of  de  Thou,  and  of  that  much 
abused  soldier  of  fortune,  Agrippa  d'Aubigne,  or  of  that  long 
series  of  contributors  to  the  national  collections  of  memoirs, 
many  of  whom  were  prime  actors  in  the  scenes  they  describe, 
and  knew  as  well  how  to  handle  the  sword  as  to  use  the  pen. 
Mr.  "White  has  also  made  excellent  use  of  the  masterly  works 
of  Professors  Soldan  and  Baum,  whose  enthusiastic  and  life- 
long labors  in  the  field  of  the  history  of  the  Reformed  Church 
have  afforded  a  most  pleasing  proof  of  the  true  unity  of  evan- 
gelical Protestantism  in  all  its  forms,  and  have  demonstrated 


]v.j9.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  3G9 

that  a  Lutheran,  in  spite  of  the  hostility  of  High  Churchmen, 
may  be  as  much  interested  in  the  welfare  of  another  branch  of  the 
great  Christian  brotherhood  as  he  would  be  if  no  doctrinal 
differences  separated  them.  Our  author  appears,  moreover,  to 
have  visited  many  of  the  most  important  localities  that  figure 
in  the  narrative,  and  to  have  instituted  some  research  for  orig- 
inal documents  in  the  archives  of  the  departments.  But  of  this 
\vc  make  little  account.  For  in  a  country  like  France,  where 
a  thousand  native  investigators  are  busily  ransacking  every 
repository  of  materials  for  history — where  the  results  of  their 
industry  are  every  year  given  to  the  public,  either  in  special 
publications  or  in  the  proceedings  of  the  great  historical  socie- 
ties and  of  local  associations — the  historian  can  scarcely  hope 
to  do  more  than  to  attempt  the  task  (itself  almost  a  Herculean 
one)  of  mastering,  digesting,  and  combining  the  multitudinous 
fruits  of  so  much  patient  and  protracted  toil.  He  may,  by 
personal  investigations  among  the  manuscripts  of  the  imperial 
and  other  libraries,  add  a  little  to  the  eclat  of  his  work ;  he 
will  not  be  likely  to  enhance  its  real  value. 

We  shall,  in  the  present  article,  confine  ourself  to  an  exam- 
ination of  the  earlier  portion  of  Mr.  White's  history. 

The  reign  of  the  first  Francis,  whose  good  fortune  it  has 
been  to  obtain  credit,  even  with  posterity,  for  far  greater  mag- 
nanimity than  he  really  possessed,  was  full  of  alternate  encour- 
agement and  rebuffs  for  the  nascent  Preformation.  The  purer 
faith,  Mr.  White  shows  us,  enjoyed  the  favor  of  one1  sincere 
friend  at  court,  and  that  was  Margaret,  the  sister  of  the  King. 
^  et  even  this  solitary  patron  was  scarcely  assured  in  her  own 
mind,  and  injured  her  influence  by  the  adoption  of  quixotic 
theories.  "  She  was  not  a  Protestant,"  says  Mr.  White  with 
justice,  "and  shrank  from  any  rupture  with  Catholicism.  She 
would  have  liked  to  see  the  old  and  the  new  Church  united, 
each  yielding  something  to  the  other.  The  age,  however,  was 
not  one  for  compromises.  Day  by  day  the  lines  of  demar- 
cation became  more  strongly  marked."  *  The  knowledge  that 
they  possessed  even  so  inconsistent  a  supporter  as  Margaret, 
fed  the  early  reformers  with  hopes  that  were  doomed  to  disap- 
pointment. She  never  could,  succeed  iu  persuading  her  brother 
to  give  his  hearty  adhesion  to  the  Gospel.     True,  he  entertained 

*  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew,  p.  C. 


370  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

a  thorough  hatred  and  disgust  for  the  monastic  orders,  and  had 
so  little  iaith  in  the  Papacy,  that,  in  moments  of  extraordinary 

provocation,  he  would  threaten  to  cast  in  his  lot  with  the  "new 
religion,"'  as  it  was  called.  But  political  motives,  especially 
that  doctrine  which  the  prelates  were  never  tired  of  inculcating, 
that  change  of  religion  inevitably  involved  an  overthrow  of  the 
State,  were  more  than  sufficient  to  counterbalance  any  inclina- 
tions which  he  may  have  had  in  that  direction.  "  Yon  would 
be  the  very  first  to  rue  the  experiment,"  was  the  ready  reply  of 
the  ecclesiastics  to  the  royal  menace.*  And  Francis  believed 
them,  and  learned  to  make  their  words  his  own.  "  lie  used 
often  to  say,  if  we  may  credit  Brantome,  that  this  novelty — the 
Reformation — '  tended  to  the  overthrow  of  all  monarchy,  hu- 
man and  divine.'  Yet  none  of  the  kings  who  embraced  the 
new  creed."  Mr.  White  well  remarks,  "  lost  their  thrones ; 
while  the  devotee  Henry  III.,  and  the  converted  Henry  IY., 
both  fell  by  orthodox  daggers."  f  "  We  need  not  stop  to  show," 
he  says  elsewhere,  %  "  that  the  kingdom  which  has  always  put 
itself  forward  as  the  champion  of  Popery,  both  in  the  East  and 
in  the  West,  "  is  that  in  which  the  Church  and  the  State  have 
suffered  more  from  revolution  than  any  Protestant  country." 

Yet  the  reformatory  movement  went  on,  if  not  with  royal 
assistance,  in  spite  of  it.  Its  supporters  were  men,  and  there- 
fore fallible.  They  made  some  mistakes.  They  were  certainly 
ill-advised  in  drawing  up  so  bitter  an  invective  against  the  ab- 
surdities of  the  Mass,  as  the  celebrated  placard  of  153-1;  and, 
if  it  was  one  of  their  number  that  posted  it  by  night  upon  the 
very  door  of  the  bedroom  of  Francis  in  his  barred  castle,  he 
undoubtedly  manifested  little  common  sense  in  supposing  that 
the.  document  would  hasten  the  conversion  of  that  trilling  and 
superficial  prince.  It  is,  however,  by  no  means  clear  that  the 
reformers  committed  one  tithe  of  the  blunders  that  were  perpe- 
trated by  crowned  and  anointed  kings  and  by  sapient  bishops, 
when  they  undertook  a  work  for  which  they  considered  them- 
selves admirably  adapted  by  native  endowments  and  by  the 
gifts  of  heaven.  They  taught  the  truth,  for  the  most  part, 
*  "  Franchemcat,  Sire,"  said  a  nuncio  of  Clement  VII.,  "  vou.s  en  sericy.  marri  le 
premier,  e-t  voua  en  prendroit  tres  mal,  ot  y  perdiicz  plus  que  le  Pape  ;  tsar  une 
nonrelle  religion,  mise  parmi  un  peuple,  no  demands  njnvs  que  chnn^emeui  du 
prince." — Brantdrnt,  vol  ix,  \>.  202. 

f  "White,  p.  20.  "  \  Ibid.,  p.  5. 


1869.]       -         Massacre  of  St.  .Bartholomew.  371 

calmly,  soberly,  and  persuasively.  They  gathered  converts 
from  the  classes  that  were  most  open  to  conviction,  succeeding 
particularly  well  with  the  intelligent  middle  classes,  with  the 
industrious  artisans,  with  the  young  whose  minds  were  un- 
biased. Even  -their  adversaries  were  forced  to  acknowledge, 
that  wherever  a  man  was  found  more  than  ordinarily  skillful, 
or  industrious,  or  successful,  there  you  would  he  almost  certain 
to  find  a  Huguenot.  "In  France,"  says  Mr.  White,  "it  was 
long  before  the  Reformation  reached  the  lower  classes — the 
masses,  as  it  is  the  fashion  to  call  them  ;  the  rural  gentry,  the 
men  of  education,  the  well-to-do  tradesmen,  artists,  and  'all 
who  from  their  callings  possessed  any  elevation  of  mind,'  were 
the  first  converts.  They  were  naturally  opposed  by  the  clergy 
and  the  lawyers,  for  corporate  bodies  are  always  great  enemies 
to  change."*  And  yet  these  remarks  must  be  taken  with 
some  qualification ;  for,  although  it  was  never  among  the  de- 
based and  brutalized  rabble  of  the  cities  that  the  new  faith 
flourished,  it  was  successful  from  the  very  beginning  pre-emi- 
nently with  the  poor.  When  Bishop  Briconnet,  in  his  short- 
lived zeal  for  a  Gospel  which  he  was  soon  to  betray,  caused  it 
to  be  preached  in  his  diocese  by  evangelical  men,  among  whom 
Lefevre  and  Farel  were  prominent,  it  was  precisely  the  poor 
wool-carders  of  Meaux,  and  the  day  laborers  that  flocked  to 
the  neighborhood  to  aid  in  the  harvest,  who  most  readily  em- 
braced the  doctrine  of  justification  by  faith.  And  it  was  they 
who,  when  others  forsook  the  profession  of  the  truth  upon  the 
approach  of  persecution,  testified  with  constancy  in  the  midst 
of  the  flames. 

The  ordeals  through  which  French  Protestantism  was  called 
to  pass  during  the  reign  of  Francis  it  does  not  comport  with 
Mr.  White's  plan  to  exhibit  in  detail,  lie  gives,  however,  a 
somewhat  extended  notice  of  the  savage  butchery  exercised 
upon  the  unoffending  Waldenses  or  Vaudois  of  Provence,  an 
offshoot  of  the  community  established  in  the  "Valleys"  of 
Piedmont.  Merindol,  Cabricres,  and  a  score  of  less  important 
places  were,  by  order  of  the  sanguinary  Parliament  of  Aix 
fazed  to  the  ground,  their  inhabitants,  without  discrimination 
of  ago  or  sex,  slaughtered  or  burned  in  their  homes,  or  hunted 
to  the  mountains,  only  to  be  suffocated  in  thecaverns  in  which 

*  White,  pp.  G-7. 


372  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July. 

the)*  had  taken  refuge.  Xo  contemporary  writer  -was  suffi- 
ciently bold  even  to  palliate  these  enormities  and  others  which 
the  pen  scarcely  dares  to  record.  That  honor — if  such  it  be — 
was  reserved  for  one  of  that  class  of  persons,  too  numerous, 
unfortunately,  in  France,  who  rewrite  history  to  suit  their  pre- 
conceived ideas.  On  this  point  Mr.  "White's  observations  are 
excellent.  "A  Catholic  historian  of  the^e  days  has  ventured 
to  apologize  for  cruelties  which  could  find  no  defender  in  the 
sixteenth  century.  -Certain  names,'  he  says,  'are  branded  for 
what  is  the  result  of  a  popular  force  and  movement  by  which 
they  are  carried  away.  In  a  religious  and  believing  state  of 
society  there  are  necessities,  as  there  have  been  cruel  political 
necessities  at  another  epoch.  Exaltation  of  ideas  drives  men 
to  crime  as  by  a  fatality.'  (Capefiguc,  Hist,  de  la  l?cformc, 
eh.  xvi.)  Such  reasoning  will  justify  any  crime,  public  or 
private.  To  admit  the  cowardly  doctrine  of  -  necessity '  is  to 
destroy  moral  responsibility,  to  make  intellect  subservient  to 
■  matter,  and  justice  to  brute  force.  It  makes  the  usurper  or  the 
murderer  accuser,  judge,  and  executioner  in  his  own  cause.  It 
is  a  vindication  of  coups  d'etat — a  deification  of  successful  vil- 
lainy. If  generally  admitted  it  would  induce  a  moral  torpor 
fatal  to  all  intelligence.  There  were  men  living  in  the  Catho- 
lic communion  in  the  sixteenth  century  who  thought  very  dif- 
ferently from  the  paradoxical  historian  of  the  nineteenth. 
Sadolet,  Bishop  of  Carpentras — a  man  so  full  of  kindness  and 
charity  that  a  modern  writer  has  called  him  the  '  Fenelon  of  his 
age' — interfered  to  suspend  the  execution  of  the  first  decree 
against  the  Yaudois  of  Merindol."  * 

The  leader  in  the  massacre  of  Merindol  and  Cabriercs  was 
Jean  d'Oppede,  first  President  of  the  Parliament  of  Provence  : 
the  most  prominent  military  officer  of  the  force  which  executed 
his  commands  was  Poulin  or  Polin,  better  known  as  Baron  de 
la  Garde.  Respecting  the  latter,  Mr.  White  says  that  lie  was 
"  the  famous  sea-captain,  the  same  who  disputed  the  command 
of  the  Channel  against  Henry  VIII.,  and  occupied  the  Isle  of 
"Wight  in  1533.  In  the  religious  wars  he  sided  with  the  11a- 
yuenots." 'f  Unless,  as  wo  suspect,  the  types  have  played  hiin 
false,  Mr.  "White  must  have  confounded  Poulin  with  some  one 
else;  for  if  the  Baron  sided  with  any  one  it  was  assuredly  not 

*  White,  pp.  U,  16.  f  Ibid.,  p.  11. 


1 509.]  Massacre  of  /St.  Bartholomew.  373 

with  the  Huguenots,  but  with  their  opponents.  After  the  con- 
spiracy of  Amboise  he  fought  against  the  Huguenots  in  Pro- 
vence, where  he  attacked  Mouvans  after  lie  had  capitulated  with 
the  royal  Lieutenant,  the  Comte  de  Tende,  and  drove  him  to 
Geneva.*  In  the  third  civil  war,  being  in  command  of  naval 
forces,  he  protected  Bordeaux  and  threatened  La  Pcchellc  ;  f 
and  after  the  St.  Bartholomew  Massacre,  a  letter  of  his  inter- 
cepted by  the  Protestants  of  this  city,  in  which  he  uttered 
menaces  against  it,  contributed  much  to  determine  them  to 
refuse  admission  to  the  Governor  sent  them  by  the  King.  J 

With  the  accession  of  a  new  monarch,  it  was  hoped  that 
there  might  come  some  alleviation  of  the  sufferings  of  the  reform- 
ers. The  reverse  took  place.  Like  too  many  of  the  other 
kings  of  France,  Henry  II.  was  not  only  frivolous,  but  disso- 
lute. Like  them,  he  was  content  to  attempt  to  compensate  for 
his  vices  by  persecuting  the  luckless  heretics  with  an  orthodox 
severity  which  prelates  were  quite  satisfied  to  accept  as  a  full 
discharge  of  all  liabilities  incurred  through  violations  of  the 
moral  code.  Besides,  if  Henry  ostensibly  held  the  reins  of 
state,  the  regal  authority  was  in  effect  enjoyed  by  others — his 
mistress,  Diana  of  Poitiers,  and  his  favorites,  the  Chancellor 
Montmorency  and  the  Guises — and  these  were  all  from  inter- 
est, if  not  from  conviction,  the  enemies  of  change.  Accord- 
ingly new  and  more  rigorous  edicts  were  launched  against  the 
"  Lutherans,"  as  they  were  still  styled.  Nor  were  these  enact- 
ments suffered  to  fall  into  neglect.  "On  Thursday,  July  4, 
Henry  quitted  the  Tournelles" — his  favorite  palace,  but  since 
forsaken  and  torn  down  by  his  widow,  Catharine  de  Medici,  after 
it  had  acquired  so  melancholy  an  association  from  his  fatal  tilt 
in  the  tournament  held  in  front,  of  it—"  at  seven  in  the  morn- 
ing, and  rode  in  grand  procession  to  the  great  cathedral,  where 
neheard  high  mass,  and  then  went  to  dine  at  the  episcopal  pal- 
ace, after  which  the  royal  digestion  was  gently  stimulated  by 
^e  burninrr  of  some  heretics.  .  . .  Heretic-burning  was  one  of  the 
popular  sports  of  the  day,  at  which— if  contemporary  engrav- 
ings are  any  authority  in  such  matters — high-born  dames 
attended  in  full  dress."  §  But  when  will  rulers  learn  the  uni- 
versal truth,  that  no  persecution  short  of  extermination  ever 

*Agripj)a  d'Aubignd,  Hist.  Univ.,  vo!.  i,  p.  100.  \  Ibid.,  p.826. 

X  Ibid.,  vol.  ii,  p.  35.  £  White,  p.  30. 

Pouara  Sebies,  Vol.  XXL— 24 


374  v  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

accomplishes  its  design !  The  Protestant  community,  which 
had  grown  slowly  during-  the  father's  reign,  under  the  more 
severe  rule  of  the  son  received  large  accessions,  and  began  to 
strike  its  roots  deep  into  the  soil  which  alone  could  secure  it 
permanence — the  despised  people : 

Extending  beyond  the  small  circle  of  nobles,  scholars,  and 
Church  dignitaries,  by  whom  they  (the  reformed  doctrines)  were 
first  taught  and  defended,  and  making  their  way  into  the  lower 
strata  of  society,  they  had  become  more  definite  and  radical.  The 
uneducated  shoemaker  or  plowman  could  not  appreciate  such  nice 
distinctions  as  Margaret  of  Valois  drew  in  her  ':  Mass  of  Seven 
Point?,'"  and  Mould  not  have  cared  for  such  subtleties  if  he  had 
understood  them.  These  simple  men  heard  the  Bible  read  and 
explained  to  them,  and  the  doctrines  of  free  grace  and  of  the 
atonement  sank  straight  into  their  hearts.  There  was  very  little 
but  habit  to  keep  the  people  faithful  to  the  old  Church.  "  They 
are  more  affected,"  says  Matthieu,  unconsciously  imitating  Horace, 
"by  example  than  by  instruction,  and  estimate  the  truth  of  a  doc- 
trine by  the  purity  of  a  man's  life."  Such  an  example  was  rarely 
found  in  the  Catholic  clergy.  .  .  .  The  cities  along  the  course 
of  the  Rhone,  and  those  lying  at  the  foot  of  the  Alps,  were 
strongly  Calviuistic,  as  was  also  Languedoc,  where  probably 
some  relics  of  the  old  Albigensian  spirit  of  revolt  still  lingered. 
In  this  province  the  Romish  Church  was  especially  hateful,  as  it 
had  been  enriched  by  the  confiscated  estates  of  the  Albigensian 
nobles. ...  In  Paris  the  mass  of  the  population  was  Catholic, 
the  dangerous  classes  being  especially  demonstrative  in  their  or- 
thodoxy. The  progress  of  religious  reform  might  have  been  more 
rapid  but  for  certain  peculiarities  in  the  state  of  society,  which 
made  every  innovation  difficult.  The  guilds  in  the  towns  had 
their  patron  saints  and  animal  festivals.  If  a  man  adopted  the 
reformed  faith  he  must  renounce  these,  aud  become  a  sort  of  out- 
cast among  his  comrades,  and  perhaps  the  severest  persecution 
he  had  to  undergo  was  that  he  endured  at  the  hands  of  his  fellow- 
workmen.  * 

Mr.  White,  is  undoubtedly  correct  in  making  the  statement 
that  "although  the  persecution  never  ceased  in  France  during 
the  reign  of  Henry  II.,  there  were  intervals  oi'  reaction  when  the 
fires  burned  dim  and  the  sword  of  the  executioner  hung  idle 
on  the  wall."  It  is  equally  true  that  "  these  were  usually  con- 
nected with  the  foreign  policy  of  the  Government."  But  he 
is  less  fortunate  in  supposing  that  there  was  any  such  tendency 
to  pardon,  or  even  to  reprieve,  the  Huguenots  in  connection 
with  the  atrocious  episode  of  Henry's  rule,  known  as  the 
*  White,  pp.  31,  32. 


1869.3  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  375 

'* affaire  de  la  Rue  Saint  Jacques"  A.  few  words  are  neces- 
t ary  to  elucidate  this  historical  point.  A  company  of  three  or 
four  hundred.  Protestants,  in  defiance  of  the  edicts  fulminated 
against  them  for  an  entire  generation,  and  not  ignorant  of  the 
fearfnl  death  by  fire  (not  at  the  stake,  but  by  means  of  the 
more  cruel  estrapade)  awaiting  them  if  discovered,  met  on  the 
night  of  September  4th,  1557,  in  a  private  house  in  the  Hue  St. 
Jacques,  immediately  in  the  rear  of  the  College  of  the  Sorbonne, 
to  worship  God  and  to  celebrate  the  holy  communion.  Bnt 
the  suspicions  of  the  neighboring  priests  had  been  aroused, 
the  house  was  beset,  and  although  some  of  the  worshipers 
made  their  way  through  the  crowd  of  their  assailants  and 
escaped,  the  more  defenseless  portion  of  the  Protestants— the 
women,  and  the  aged  especially — were  captured,  and  to  the 
number  of  about  one  hundred  and  twenty,  after  being  treated 
with  the  utmost  contumely,  were  thrust  into  loathsome  dun- 
geons. This  was  but  a  prelude  to  greater  severities.  Several 
of  the  men,  and  particularly  a  noble  lady,  were  to  seal  their 
testimony  in  blood. 

Here  Mr.  White  has  accidentally  been  misled  into  imagin- 
ing that  the  execution  of  these  martyrs  for  the  faith  was  unac- 
countably delayed  ;  whereas,  on  the  contrary,  rarely  had  there- 
been  an  instance  of  greater  precipitation  !     Mr.  White  says  : 

The  Reformed  Church  of  Paris  -was  in  a  pitiable,  state,  so  many  of 
its  members  being  in  peril  of  their  lives.  Extraordinary  prayers 
were  offered  up  in  every  family  for  the  delivery  of  the  martyrs, 
and  a  remonstrance,  drawn  up  by  the  Elders,  was  presented  to  the 
King,  who  put  it  aside  unnoticed.  Hut,  strange  to  say,  there  was 
no  eager  haste  to  punish  the  prisoners  any  further,  the  example 
of  their  seizure  having  frightened  many  back  to  orthodoxy.  .  .  . 
When  the  e^:citcrn.eni  had  abated,  and  the  affair  teas  almost  for- 
gotten,  the  prisoners  of  the  Hue  St.  Jacques  xoerc  brought  to  trial. 
Their  lives  were  forfeited  by  the  mere  fact  of  their  presence  at  an 
unlawful  assembly,  and  the  alternate  of  recantation  or  death  was 
presented  to  them  ;  but  they  would  not  yield  an  inch.  They  found 
that  man's  weakness  was  God's  strength.  Among  the  captives 
was  Philippade  Lunz,  a  woman  of  good  family,  a  widow,  and  only 
twenty-two  years  old.  She  was  interrogated  several  times,  but  her 
answers  wove  such  as  to  destroy  all  hope  of  pardon.  On  the  '2",(h 
°f  September,  1558,  more  than  a  year  after  her  imprisonment,  sho 
was  led  out  to  death  * 

*  White,  pp.  41,  42. 


376  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

It  is  not  necessary  to  repeat  the  story  of  the  more  than  he- 
roic courage  which  this  noble  woman  displayed,  and  by  which 
she  seemed  to  triumph  over  every  refinement  of  cruelty  which 
the  perverted  ingenuity  of  man  could  devise.  Mr.  "White  has 
very  faithfully  drawn  the  harrowing  picture.  The  important 
point  to  which  we  call  attention — important  as  showing  that 
the  French  court,  so  far  from  being  lukewarm  in  the  work  of 
persecution,  as  Mr.  White  supposes,  was  in  reality  (whether 
its  motives  were  political  or  fanatical  need  not  here  be  dis- 
cussed) extremely  zealous — is,  that  this  martyr  and  her  com- 
panions, instead  of  being  imprisoned  for  the  long  term  of  a 
year,  were  tried,  condemned,  and  executed  within  the  brief 
space  of  about  three  weeks.  Mr.  "White  has  given  the  day 
correctly,  but  has  unfortunately  overlooked  the  true  year, 
which  was  1557,  not  1558.-  The  author  of  the  history  of  the 
Reformed  Churches,  commonly  attributed  to  Beza,  instead  of 
representing  the  case  as  dragging  along  slowly,  informs  us  that 
the  popular  voice  demanded  a  speedy  trial ;  that  the  prosecut- 
ing officer  was  more  than  usually  urgent,  hoping  by  his  zeal 
to  divert  attention  from  his  own  past  crimes  ;  that  on  the  17th 
of  September,  less  than  a  fortnight  after  the  meeting  in  the  Rue 
St.  Jacqnes,  the  King  ordered  Parliament  to  try  the  accused 
by  commissioners,  whom  he  at  the  same  time  named ;  and 
that  he  commanded  the  postponement  of  all  other  judicial 
proceedings  that  these  might  have  dispatch. f  The  fruits  of 
this  pressure  were  seen  before  long.  Three  suffered  martyr- 
dom September  27,  two  more  October  2.  Objection  being 
made  to  the  judges  because  of  their  cruelty,  and  a  demand 
offered  for  other  judges,  the  King  overruled  the  appeal  Octo- 
ber 7,  and  the  remaining  cases  proceeded  with  still  greater 
haste.  So  far  was  the  court  of  Henry  II.  from  being  luke- 
warm in  the  prosecution  of  those  accused  of  heresy. 

The. affair  of  the  Rue  St.  Jacques  occurred  just*aftcr  the  dis- 
astrous rout  of  the  French  army  near  St.  Quentin,  which  Pres- 
cott  has  so  well  described  in  the  '''History  of  Philip  the  Sec- 
ond." After  a  year  and  eight  months  more  of  warfare  the 
contending  monarchs  and  their  allies  made  a  settlement  of 
their  differences  in  the  peace  of  Cateau  Cambresis.     "With  the 

*  Sec  the  Histoire  Eccl&iastique,  (Beza,)  ed.  of  Lille,  ™i.  i,  p.  80,  etc. 
f  Histoire  Eccl&iastique,  ubi  supra. 


1  S69.1  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  377 

general  terms  of  the  treaty,  so  disgraceful  to  France,  the  his- 
torian of  the  Huguenots  has  nothing  to  do.  There  can  be 
no  doubt  that  both  monarchs  were  influenced  not  only  by  the 
exhaustion  of  their  pecuniary  resources  for  carrying  on  the  war, 
but  by  a  desire  to  attend  to  the  extermination  of  Protestantism 
at  home.  Mr.  White  goes  further,  and  asserts  that  "  by  the 
treaty  of  Cateau  Cambresis  Henry  and  Philip  hadbouncl  them- 
■  foes  to  maintain  the  Catholic  worship  inviolate,  to  assemble,  a 
general  counci],  and  to  extinguish  heresy  in  their  respective 
dominions.''''  If  this  agreement,  of  which  the  younger  Tavanncs 
and  others  make  mention,  writing  in  accordance  with  the  cur- 
rent reports  rather  than  basing  their  statements  on  any  author- 
itative documents,  existed  at  all,  it  must  have  been  contained 
in  secret  articles,  for  the  public  terms,  as  given  by  Du  Mont 
and  other  collections  of  treaties,  contain  nothing  of  the  kind. 
Professor  Soldan  has  exhibited  with  great  force  his  grounds 
for  not  believing  the  compact,  and  we  do  not  see  that  Mr. 
White  adduces  any  reasons  for  supposing  that  the  conferences 
ever  assumed  so  definite  a  shape.  Certainly  the  Apology  of 
William  of  Orange,  while  proving  that  Philip  had  already 
conceived  in  his  mind,  and  communicated  to  Henry,  the  design 
of  introducing  the  Spanish  Inquisition  into  the  Netherlands, 
is  far  from  asserting  that  such  international  obligations  had  been 
entered  into.  However  this  may  be,  there  is  the  utmost  im- 
probability in  the  supposition  that  there  was  a  connection 
between  the  treaty  and  the  massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  Yet 
this  is  what  Mr.  White  seems  to  imply  when  he  speaks  of  the 
"  knowledge  of  this  projected  massacre,  delayed  for  thirteen 
years,"  as  converting  the  Silent  Prince  into  the  liberator  o\' 
the  Netherlands.*  The  idea  is,  however,  so  diametrically  op- 
posed to  Mr.  White's  own  theory  of  the  origin  of  the  horrible 
scheme  of  j572  that  we  are  at  a  loss  to  know  how  to  under- 
stand his  words.  The  manuscript  relations,  by  Philip's  own 
ministers,  of  the  proceedings  at  the  Conference  of  Bayonne  in 
1565,  as  we  may  see  hereafter,  have  blown  to  the  winds  the 
stories  that  were  so  confidently  believed,  both  by  Roman  Cath- 
olics and  by  Protestants,  that  the  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholo- 
mew was  planned  there  by  Alva  and  Catharine.  It  could  nut 
possibly  have  been  sketched  out  six  years  earlier. 
*  White,  p.  53. 


378  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

Without  doubt,  however,  Henry  II.  had  determined  on  em- 
ploying the  most  extreme  measures  to  secure  the  utter  destruc- 
tion of  the  Protestants.  His  arbitrary  arrest  of  members  of 
the  Parisian  Parliament,  for  simply  expressing  themselves  in 
favor  of  a  tolerant  policy,  when  deliberating  in  his  presence  in 
ajudicial  capacity,  amply  proves  it.  With  good  reason,  there- 
fore, the  reformers  saw  in  the  extraordinary  and  opportune 
death  of  Henry  an  interposition  of  Heaven  in  their  behalf, 
even  more  signal  than  had  appeared  in  that  of  the  first 
Francis.  Mr.  White  has  described  the  incidents  of  the  fatal 
tournament  in  a  picturesque  manner,  putting  to  good  service 
the  correspondence  of  Sir  Nicholas  Throkmorton,  who  tells 
us  that  he  was  the  only  one  of  the  foreign  embassadors  that 
chanced  to  be  present  on  the  remarkable  occasion.-  The 
English  envoy,  writing  the  very  evening  of  the  disaster,  and 
before  its  full  peril  was  apprehended,  could  not  but  be  struck 
with  its  providential  character.  "  Thus  your  lordships  may 
see,"  said  he,  "what  God  sumtymes  dothe  to  shew  what  he 
is,  and  to  be  knowne  ;  that  amongst  all  these  triumphes,  and 
even  in  the  verry  middst  and  pride  of  the  same,  suffereth  such 
mischaunce  and  heavines  to  happen." 

The  accession  of  Francis  IT.,  a  puny  boy  of  sixteen,  brought 
into  power  the  uncles  of  his  blooming  and  much  more  intel- 
lectual queen,  Mary  Stuart,  Never  was  power  more  boldly 
seized,  or  more  recklessly  wielded,  than  by  the  Guise  brothers. 
For  some  months  there  was  a  reign  of  usurpation  for  which 
there  arc  few  parallels  in  the  annals  of  modem  Europe.  The 
two"  older  Guises  absorbed  the  entire  administration.  The 
Duke  Francis  installed  himself  as  generalissimo  ;  his  brother 
the  Cardinal  of  Lorraine,  assumed  charge  of  the  treasury,  and 
in  fact  of  the  whole  engine  o\'  civil  government.  All  this  by 
pretended  appointment  oi'  a  minor  prince.  The  scheme  would 
probably  have  failed,  had  the  claim  to  the  regency  fallen  to 
the  portion  of  a  less  frivolous  and  untrustworthy  person  than 
Antoine  of  Bourbon  Venddme,  by  marriage  King  of  Navarre. 
But  this  unworthy  husband  of  the  heroic  Jeanne  d'Albret, 
had  too  little  resolution  to  hoop  the  promises  lie  lavishly 
made  to  the  Protestants,  with  whom  he  had  pretended  to 

*  Forbes'  Full  View  of  tho  Public  Transactions  in  the  Reign  of  Queen  Eli 
(London,  1710,)  vol.  i,  p.  151. 


]  B69J  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  379 

identify  himself,  and  was  too  craven  even  to  resent  the  stud- 
ied indignities  put  upon  him  when  lie  came  sluggishly  from 
Gascony  and  made  Lis  tardy  appearance  at  court.  As  first 
prince  of  the  "blood,  he  was  entitled  to  the  foremost  place  in 
tin.'  board  of  regency ;  in  fact,  to  be  sole  regent,  although  with 
:i  board  of  counselors  to  assist  him  in  his  functions.  The 
only  crumb  of  power  which  the  ruling  family  deigned  to 
throw  him  was  the  privilege  of  a  seat  in  the  royal  council, 
where  he  had  no  influence  whatever.  Mr.  "White  overstates 
the  amount  of  this  concession.  Constable  Montmorency  and 
the  Chatillons,  and  other  leading  Protestants,  had  not  urged 
him  "  to  assert  his  rights  as  prince  of  the  blood  to  be  one  of 
the  new  council,"  but  to  demand  the  very  first  position  until 
Francis  IT.  should  attain  his  majority.  Hence  Mr.  White  is 
mistaken  when  he  seems  to  assert  that  Antoine  of  jSTavarro 
obtained  for  a  time  what  he  Avas  entitled  to  demand.  "  At 
length  Conde  joined  him,  and  instilling  some  of  his  own  spirit 
into  his  brother,  urged  him  to  assert  his  claim.  It  was  granted 
after  some  little  demur  ;  but  he  was  too  much  in  the  way,  and 
to  get  rid  of  him  honorably  he  was  commissioned  to  escort  the 
Princess  Elizabeth  to  Spain.  lie  fell  into  the  trap  so  cun- 
ningly laid  for  him,  and  the  Guises  were  once  more  sole  mas- 
ters." *  One  need  go  no  further  than  to  the  invaluable  history 
of  Francis  the  Second's  reign,  by  Regnier  dc  la  Planchc,|  to 
see  that  the  Guises  never  for  a  moment  conceded  to  the  King 
of  Navarre  the  authority  which,  in  defense  of  the  usages  of 
the  kingdom  and  of  his  persecuted  fellow-Protestants,  he  might 
justly  have  demanded  at  the  point  of  the  sword. 

Under  such  a  government  persecution  went  on  apace.  The 
most  distinguished  victim  was  Du  Bourg,  one  of  the  members 
of  Parliament  whom  the  late  King  had  arrested.  Ilis  speeches 
just  before  being  led  to  execution,  of  which  we  could  wish  that 
Air.  White  had  given  longer  extracts,  %  are  among  the  mo  I 
pathetic  on  record,  and  breathe  the  very  spirit  of  Christian 
manliness.  During  the  course  of  his  trial,  Minard,  one  of  his 
judges,  was  murdered  by  night  in   the  streets  of  Paris.     The 

•White,  p.  72. 

f  Histoire  do  l'Estat  do  Franco,  etc.     EditioD  Pantheon,  pp.  214,  '-'IS. 
t  Soo  La  Place,  Commentaries,  etc.,  pp.  22,  23  ;  Orespin,  Galerie  cluvt,  pp.  2,  3,  IS, 
«*X;  La  Planche,  pp.  227,  235;  Histoire  Eccle'sinstique,  pp.  1,1  i>3,  cic. 


3S0  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

crime  was  attributed  by  common  fame  to  a.  Scot  by  the  name 
of  Stuart,  a  blood  relation,  apparently,  of  the  Queen.  Mr. 
White  does  not  hesitate  to  adopt  the  popular  belief  as  his  own, 
and  to  incorporate  it  in  his  history  ;  and,  with  equal  certainty, 
he  pronounced  him  guilty  of  having  fatally  shot  Constable 
Montmorency  in  the  battle  of  St.  Denis,  in  the  second  civil 
war,  November  10,  1567.*  But  neither  statement,  is  capable 
of  being  proved.  When  Henry  of  Navarre,  at  a  later  time 
Henry  IV.,-  wrote  to  the  Duke  of  Anjou,  soon  after  the  battle 
of  Jarnac,  where  Stuart,  having  surrendered  on  promise  of 
haying  his  life  spared,  was  hilled  in  cold  blood,  probably  by 
the  Duke's  secret  orders,  the  prince  reproached  him  with  the 
barbarous  deed  ;  and,  as  to  the  assassination  ofMinard,  adduced 
the  fact  that  Stuart  had  been  examined  by  torture, but  nothing- 
had  been  extracted  from  him,  and  that  he  had  lived  six  years 
subsequently  at  court  without  even  being  subjected  to  trial,  as 
a  proof  of  his  innocence.  Whether  he  slew  the  Constable  or 
not,  Henry  professed  entire  ignorance,  but  maintained  that 
if  he  did  it  was  in  honorable  combat,  f 

The  usurpation  of  the  Guises  at  length  became  insufferable, 
but  there  was  no  legal  redress.  ISTo  constitution  laid  down 
methods  of  consulting  the  popular  will,  and  of  giving  it  the 
force  of  law.  A  revolt  of  some  kind  or  other  was  inevitable. 
"In  these  humaner  and  more  civilized  days,  obnoxious  min- 
isters and  administrators  are  got  rid  of  by  dismissal,  or  by  a 
vote  in  Parliament :  in  ruder  times  they  were  removed  by 
revolt  or  assassination.  In  the  nihil  I  c  of  the  sixteenth  century 
the  government  of  France  was  a  despotism  moderated  by  the 
dagger."  The  Huguenots — for  so  they  began  about  this 
time  to  be  called — were  of  two  kinds.  The  one  class  was 
composed  of  persons  exasperated  almost  beyond  endurance  by 
the  unconstitutional  power  assumed  by  the  Guises,  whom  they 
still  regarded  as  strangers  in  France.  The  other  consisted  of 
the  Protestants,  who,  however  patiently  they  might  bear  the 
persecution  from  which  they  had  for  nearly  forty  years  been 
suffering,  so  long  as  it  was  inflicted  by  command  of  their  legit- 
imate monarch,  would,    not   suffer   themselves  to   be   hung  or 

*  White,  pp.  74,  81. 

f  Letter  of  July  12,  1569,  apud  "Lettrca  incites  dc  Henry  IV.,  recuoillies  par 
le  Prince  Augustin  G-alitzin,  pp.  4-11.     Faris :  1SC0. 


IS69.1  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  3S1 

burned  merely  to  gratify  the  whims  or  the  ambition  of  the  two 
brothers  who  really  reigned  in  the  name  of  their  niece's  hus- 
band. "  Even  within  a  month  of  the  death  of  Henry  II.  a 
union  of  the  malcoutents  was  meditated,  the  Reformed  only 
holding  back  until  they  should  be  assured  of  its  lawfulness. 
They  consulted  Calvin,  who  declared  that  '  it  would  be  better 
they  should  all  perish  a  hundred  times  over  rather  than  expose 
the  name  of  Christianity  and  of  the  Gospel  to  the  disgrace  of 
rebellion  and  bloodshed.'  They  were  more  successful  with 
some  German  divines,  who  thought  'they  might  lawfully  op- 
pose the  usurpation  of  the  Guises,  even  with  arms,  if  the 
princes  of  the  blood,  their  lawful  magistrates  by  birth,  or  even 
one  of  them,  should  be  at  their  head.'  "  * 

And  now  the  outbreak  followed.  The  spirit  of  dissatisfac- 
tion came  to  a  head  in  the  unfortunate  "Conspiracy  of  Am- 
boise  ;"  unfortunate,  not  that  it  was  not  perfectly  justifiable  in 
view  of  the  enormities  of  the  persons  that  had  seized  the  reins 
of  State,  but  because  it  afforded  the  enemy  the  excuse  he 
wanted  for  accusing  the  adherents  of  the  purer  faith  of  insub- 
ordination to  constituted  authority,  and  for  throwing  upon 
them  the  blame  of  being  the  first  to  have  recourse  to  civil  war. 
Probably  it  was  much  the  smaller  part  of  the  Huguenots  that 
knew  of  the  plot,  or  took  part  in  it.  Its  bold  plan,  the  reasons 
of  its  failure,  the  fear  and  confusion  of  the  Guises  at  the  first 
discovery,  their  considerable  concessions,  and  the  barbarous 
punishments  they  inflicted  upon  the  conspirators  that  fell  into 
'heir  hands,  are  a  fruitful  theme  of  discussion  for  contempo- 
rary chroniclers,  and  are'  unfolded  at  considerable  length  by 
Sir.  White.  And  he  calls  attention  to  the  circumstance  that 
the  first  pardon,  hypocritical  as  it  was,  offered  to  the  Hugue- 
nots that  had  taken  part  in  the  affair  of  Amboise  met  with 
uncompromising  hostility  on  the  part  of  Rome.  "  The  Pope 
sent  a  special  envoy  to  France  complaining  of  the  amnesty, 
Mid  to  point  out  that '  the  true  remedy  for  the  disorders  of  the 
kingdom  was  to  proceed  judicially  against  the  heretics,  and 
if  their  number  was  too  great,  the  King  should  employ  the 
sword  to  bring  his  subjects  back  to  their  duty.'  lie  offered  to 
assist  in  so  epod  a  work  to  the  extent  of  his  ability,  and  to  pro- 
cure the  support  of  the  King  of  Spain  and  the  Princes  of  Italy.f 
*  White,  pp.  17.  f  Ibid.,  pp.  85,  86. 


SS2  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

Happily  the  reign  of  Francis  II.  was  brief— briefer,  in  fact, 
than  any  other  in  the  tables  of  French  kings.  Its  conclusion 
found  the  Protestants  in  great  peril ;  Conde,  their  real  head,  a 
prisoner  under  sentence  of  death,  and  reserved  for  execution 
at  the  opening  of  the  approaching  States  General ;  and  Navarre 
exposed  to  almost  equal  danger  should  he  attempt  to  show- 
any  rnanly  resentment.  Whereas,  a  few  months  before,  any 
one  that  proposed  the  convocation  of  the  States  would  have 
been  punished  as  seditious,  now  the  Guises  had  themselves 
adopted  the  proposition  of  Ooliguy  at  the  Assembly  of  Xotables, 
held  at  Fontainebleau,  and  consented  to  the  summons  of  the 
three  orders.  Not  that  they  had  any  intention  of  submitting 
an  account  of  their  administration  to  the  representatives  of  the 
nobility,  clergy,  and  commons;  but  they  counted  upon  con- 
trolling a  large  majority  of  the  elections  of  delegates,  and 
expected  to  secure  without  difficulty  so  preponderating  an  influ- 
ence as  to  insure  the  formal  indorsement  of  their  conduct  and 
the  destruction  of  their  antagonists.  After  the  heads  of  the 
Huguenots  had  been  disposed  of  they  imagined  that  it  would 
be  easy  to  compass  the  ruin  of  the  masses.*  The  death  of 
Francis  II.,  almost  as  sudden  as  that  of  his  father,  although 
resulting  from  a  natural  cause,  disarranged  these  well-matured 
plans.  » 

One  of  the  most  readable  chapters  in  Mr.  "White's  book  is 
that  which  treats  of"  France  at  the  accession  of  Charles  IX. ,:' 
(15G0.)  Within  the  compass  of  thirty-two  or  three  pages  he 
lias  succeeded  in  giving  us  an  attractive  and  intelligent  account 
of  the  country  and  its  inhabitants.  France' was,  a  sparsely- 
peopled  country  containing  about  fifteen  million  souls — a  large 
estimate  in  our  opinion — and  of  this  population  nearly  one 
third  lived  in  towns.  The  roads  were  bad,  and  all  means  of 
communication  so*  slow  and  costly  as  to  paralyze  commerce, 
and  produce  the  most  striking  inequalities  in  prices  in  districts 
not  very  far  distant  from  each  other.  Fan's,  the  marvel  of 
Europe,  contained  between  four  and  five  hundred  thousand 
inhabitants.  The  people — the  tiers-etat — were  ground  down 
with  oppressive  taxes,  far  more  burdensome  in  proportion  than 

*  Even  the  Spanish  embassador,  favorable  as  he  was  to  all  in?*aros  of  repres- 
sion, expressed  solicitude  lest  the  Guises,  in  their  reckless  haste,  Bhould  run  too 
great  risks  by  their  indiscretion. — Mi-jnt!,  in  Journal  da  Savants,  1S59,  pp.  39. 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  333 

those  of  modern  France  even  under  the  second  empire.  The 
nobles  were  exempt  on  the  plea  of  being  subject  to  do  military 
service,  the  clergy  because  of  their  sacerdotal  cilice  ;  although 
both  classes,  and  particularly  the  latter,  in  return  for  the  regal 
protection,  were  wont  to  make  voluntary  contributions.  The 
government  was  harsh  and  tyrannical,  the  punishment  of  crime 
severe  and  often  horribly  barbarous,  the  populace  cruel  and 
superstitious.  We  shall  not,  however,  undertake- to  give  even 
a  synopsis  of  the  contents  of  this  interesting  disquisition. 

The  reign  of  Charles  IX.  opens  with  the  Convocation  of  the 
States  General  ordered  by  his  brother,  and  with  brilliant  antic- 
ipations on  the  part  of  the  reformers  respecting  the  rapid 
spread  of  the  Gospel  until  it  should  become  universal  through- 
out the  kingdom.  It  is  hard  to  say  what  might  have  been  had 
the  King  of  Navarre  proved  courageous  and  true  to  his  con- 
victions. But  he  first  basely  surrendered  to  Catharine  the 
position  of  influence  he  might  easily  have  maintained,  and 
then  openly  apostatized  from  the  faith.  Still  the  reformed 
doctrines,  practically,  if  not  legally,  enjoying  a  measure  of  tol- 
eration, spread  from  town  to  town,  from  family  to  family,  with 
the  speed  of  contagion.  Within  a  few  months  there  were 
those  who,  misled  by  this  rapid  growth,  were  confident  that 
half  France  was  already  Huguenot,  and  the  Spanish  and  Pon- 
tifical envoys  wrote  home  letters  full  of  vaticinations  of  the 
approaching  downfall  of  the  State.  The  very  court  of  the 
King  and  his  mother  appeared  to  share  in  the  common  move- 
ment. Marot's  and  Beza's  versified  Psalms  of  David,  which,  if 
sung  in  the  streets  a  few  months  since,  would  have  sufficed  as 
ground  for  a  capital  accusation,  were  boldly  sung  in  the  halla 
and  corridors  of  the  palace.  Soon  Huguenot  ministers, 
whom  unrepealed  edicts  consigned  to  the  flames,  were  to  be 
seen  preaching  openly  to  listening  crowds  in  the  quarter.-  of 
the  Queen  of  Navarre  or  of  Admiral  Coligny.  Catharine 
de Medici  was  deaf  to  the  warnings  and  threats  of  the  Pope, 
his  nuncio,  and  his  legates.  She  had  conceived  the  idea  thai 
it  was  possible,  by  some  partial  reformation,  to  accommodate 
the  differences  between  the  Protestants  and  the  Roman  Cath  <- 
lies;  and,  accordingly,  she  assembled  at  Poissy,  in  September, 
15G1,  a  large  number  of  divines  of  both  persuasions,  between 
whom  she  hoped  that   some   accord    might  be  framed.     This 


3S4  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

"  Colloquy  of  Poissy,"  as  it  was  called,  in  order  to  avoid  the 
suspicions  which  the  use  of  the  term  {;  Council "  might  give 
rise  to,  was  a  moment  of  the  greatest  interest  and  of  critical 
importance  to  the  future  of  France.*  A  reformation  accom- 
plished and  harmony  secured  might  have  saved  France  the 
Bufferings  and  the  bloodshed  of  thirty  years,  not  to  speak  of 
the  vast  difference  in  the  moral  history  of  the  land.  But  the 
Romish  clergy  was  in  no  temper  for  concession.  There  is  in 
Montfaucon's  Antiquities  of  France  a  copy  of  an  ancient  print 
of  the  period,  representing  the  Colloquy  in  session.  The  dis- 
position of  the  parties  sufficiently  reveals  the  attitude  which 
the  Roman  Catholic  Church  meant  to  assume  to  the  lieformcrs. 
Six  chairs  of  state  stand  toward  the  upper  end  of  the  spacious 
conventual  dining-room,  one  occupied  by  the  King,  having  on 
his  right  the  Duke  of  Anjou  and  the  King  of  Navarre,  and  on 
the  left  his  mother,  his  sister  Margaret,  and  the  Queen  of  Xa- 
varre.  Behind  them  are  seated  other  princes  and  princesses 
of  the  blood.  The  Chancellor,  the  Cardinals,  the  Prelates  and 
Doctors  of  the  Romish  Church  occupy  benches  on  either  side, 
corresponding  to  their  dignities.  But  the  Protestant  Divines, 
twelve  in  number,  are  merely  admitted  to  the  lower  end  of  the 
room,  and  stand  leaning  on  the  railing  that  bars  their  further 
advance.  The  chief  spokesman  of  the  Reformers,  it  is  well 
known,  was  Theodore  Beza.  "  Calvin,  Beza,  Peter  Martyr, 
and  other  ministers  were  invited,  under  safe  conduct,  from 
Switzerland,"  says  Mr.  White,  f  The  very  natural  inquiry, 
why  the  first  mentioned,  the  acknowledged  leader  of  the  Gene- 
vese  theologians,  did  not  make  his  appearance  and  assume  the 
position  in  the  conference  to  which  his  eminent  intellectual 
abilities,  his  dialectic  skill,  and  his  wide  spread  reputation  en- 
titled him,  Mr.  White  does  not  undertake  to  answer.  Mr. 
Bonnet,  in  his  "  Lettres  Franchises  de  Jean  Calvin,"  merely 
informs  us  that  "the  Protestant  princes  of  France,  eager  to 
attract  to  the  Colloquy  of  Poissy  the  most  distinguished  min- 
isters, wrote  to  the  Lords  of  Geneva,  asking  them  to  send 
Calvin  or  Theodore  Beza.  The  Seigneurie  refused  the  former, 
and  consented  to  grant  the  latter."     Informed  of  this"  favor- 

*Mr.  White  lias  scarcely  given  sufficient  space  (pp.  167-172)  to  a  transaction 
of  such  vital  relation  to  tie  subsequent  fortunes  of  the  Huguenots. 
t  Page  167. 


1SC0.3  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  3S5 

able  disposition,  the  King  of  Navarre  wrote  to  the  Genevese 
magistrates  to  thank  thorn  and  to    hasten    Beza's  departure.* 

Fortunately,  by  the  aid  of  a  letter  in  the  public  library  of 
Geneva  that  has  recently  come  to  light,  we  are  able  to  explain 
the  motives  of  a  course  which;  at  first  sight,  appears  somewhat 
strange.  It  was  no  excess  of  caution,  but  a  proper  regard  for 
the  reformer's  safety,  that  led  the  Syndics  and  Council  of  Geneva 
to  exercise  a  right  which,  according  to  the  theory  almost  uni- 
versally held  in  the  sixteenth  century,  they  possessed,  to  decline 
to  permit  their  pastors  and  theological  professors  to  leave  their 
territory.  The  letter  is  one  written  by  M.  de  la  Riviere,  in  the 
name  of  the  entire  body  of  Reformed  ministers  of  Paris,  or 
perhaps  of  France,  to  Calvin  himself.  The  date  is  July  31st, 
.1561.  The  Colloquy,  it  is  well  known,  opened  on  the  9th  of 
September.  After  praising  God  that,  even  beyond  their  hopes, 
the  venerable  Peter  Martyr  was  to  be  sent  to  support  Beza  in 
the  discussion  with  the  Romish  Doctors,  the  writer  adds  : 

As  to  yourself,  sir,  as  we  have  not  yet  seen  much  prospect  of 
being  able  to  have  you  here,  so  we  see  no  possibility  of  your 
being  here  without  serious  peril,  in  view  of  the  rage  which 
all  the  enemies  of  the  Gospel  have  conceived  against  you, 
and  the  disturbances  which  your  very  name  would  excite  in  this 
country  were  your  presence  known.  In  fact,  the  Admiral  (Co- 
ligny)  is  by  no  means  in  favor  of  your  undertaking  the  journey, 
and  we  have  learned  with  certainty  that  the  Queen  (Catharine 
de  Medici)  would  not  either  be  glad  to  see  you,  and  that  she 
frankly  admits  that  she  is  unwilling  to  pledge  herself  for  your 
safety  "in  these  parts,  as  for  that  of  the  rest.  The  enemies  of  the 
Gospel,  on  the  other  hand,  say  that  they  would  willingly  hear  all 
the  others  speak,  but  that  as  to  you  they  could  not  bring  them- 
selves to  listen  to  you  nor  to  sec  you.  This,  sir,  is  the  estimation  in 
which  you  ore  held  by  these  venerable  Prelates.  I  opine  that  you 
will  not  be  very  much  troubled  by  it,  and  that  you  will  not  con- 
sider yourself  dishonored  for  being  in  such  repute  with  this  suit 
of  people.  In  respect  to  the  others,  we  are  constrained  to  beg 
you  anew  to  entreat  them  to  set  out  with  the  greatest,  diligence 
possible  on  receipt  of  the  safe-conduct  which  we  sendyou.  In 
our  judgment  it.  will  be  easy  to  come  hither  without  being  much 
recognized.  Moreover,  on  arriving  here  we  can  assure  yon  that 
we  shall  be  able  to  find  three  or  four  hundred  gentlemen,  if  they 
are  needed,  to  keep  them  company.  And  yet  wc  have  no  thought 
that  there  will  be  any  necessity  for  so  large  a  force,  seeii  g  that 
there  is  no  prospect  that  any  of  the  princes  or  lords  of  this  king- 
dom will  undertake  any  thing  in  violation  of  the  permission  and 
*  Bonnet,  Lettros  Frau9aidcs,  vol.  ii,  p.  424. 


SS6  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

safe-conduct   given    by    the    King   and    decided    upon    in    Lis 
Council.* 

So  Calvin  remained  at  Geneva,  and  Theodore  Beza  went  to 
the  French  court,  to  make  the  first  defense  of  the  Reformed 
doctrines  and  their  professors  which  the  ears  of  French  mon- 
arch^ had  ever  been  open  to  hear.  And  so  noble  was  his  ap- 
pearance, so  courtly  his  bearing,  so  polished  his  manners,  that 
he  produced  from  the  very  first  the  most  "favorable  impression. 
Even  the  Guises  affected  to  greet  him  in  a  correspondingly 
polite  manner.  The  Cardinal  went  further,  and,  in  the  course 
of  a  friendly  discussion,  made  such  professions  of  a  desire  for 
conciliation,  and  took  such  almost  Protestant  ground,  that  one 
who  knew  not  that  his  affable  exterior  covered  a  treacherous 
heart  might  have  supposed  him  on  the  point  of  conversion.  ■ 
Bezt  had  traced  his  course  too  long  to  be  deceived,  and  there 
were  others  who  were  equally  astute.  After  Beza  had  explained 
his  view  of  the  sacrament  of  the  Lord's  Supper,  the  Cardinal, 
turning  to  the  Queen  mother,  who  was  present,  observed, 
"  Such  is  my  belief,  madam,  and  I  am  satisfied."  f  Madame 
de  Crussol,  who  had  listened  to  the  entire  conversation,  as  she 
shook  the  Cardinal's  hand  at  the  close  of  the  evening  signifi- 
cantly said,  in  a  tone  loud  enough  to  be  heard  by  all,  "  Good 
man  for  to-night;  but  to-morrow  what?"  There  was  sober 
truth  couched  in  the  witty  cmcbtion.  The  next  day  Lorraine 
was  already  busy,  circulating  the  story  that  Beza  had  been  sig- 
nally discomfited  in  the  very  first  encounter.  \  But  there  were 
happily  plenty  of  witnesses  to  prove  the  contrary,  and  Catha- 
rine herself  contradicted  the  vain  rumor  when  she  heard  it 
from  Constable  Montmorency's  lips.  § 

With  so  deceitful  an  opponent  it  was  impossible  to  expect 
fair  play,  even  had  the  Prelates  been  willing  to  listen  patiently 
to  au  honorable  discussion.  |j     The  Cardinal's  sole  object,  as  it 

*  Original  MS.  in  Library  of  Geneva,  Bulletin  de  la  Soca'le  do  I'JIistoiro  du 
Protestantisme  Francois,  10,G03.   (December,  13G7.) 

|  White,  p.  GS. 

{Letter  of  Beza,  August  25th,  1661,  o;>N'?Bnum,  Theodore  Beza,  2  A  pp.  52. 
Mr.  White  does  not  mention  the  latter  circumstances. 

g  Hist.  Ecclus,  vol.  i,  p.  312. 

\llHert  come  tin  Genevese  cms"  exclaimed  one  of  the  Cardinals  when  the 
twelve  Protestant  divines  made  their  first  appearance  in  the  refectory  at  Poi  -y. 
"  Certainly,"  quietly  retorted  Beza,  whose  car  had  caught  the  insulting  expi 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  3S7 

developed  itself  shortly,  was  to  involve  the  Protestants  in  dis- 
putes with  each  other,  lie  went  so  far,  at  one  time,  as  to 
demand  of  the  Reformed  pastors  a  subscription  to  the  Con- 
fession of  Augsburg.  To  which  their  orator  pertinently  replied, 
by  asking  whether  the  Cardinal  was  himself  prepared  to  give 
that  Confession  his  unqualified  approval. 

So  the  Colloquy  came  to  an  end  without  effecting  any  thing, 
perhaps,  with  the  government,  except  proving  pretty  con- 
clusively that  it  was  hopeless  to  attempt  to  reconcile  such 
divergent  views  as  those  of  the  hierarchy  and  those  of  the 
reformers.  As  a  last  trial  of  the  virtue  of  theological  discus- 
sion, Catharine  assembled  at  St.  Germain,  a  few  months  later, 
a  more  quiet  gathering.  But  the  results  were  equally  unsatis- 
factory. One  point,  however,  had  been  demonstrated  con- 
clusively in  the  minds  of  all  prudent  men,  that  the  only  mode 
of  preventing  the  outbreak  of  civil  war  in  France  was  to  grant 
some  measure  of  religious  liberty  to  the  reformers.  And  this 
measure  was  carried,  in  a  body  of  representatives  of  the  three 
orders,  and  formally  promulgated  in  the  celebrated  royal  edict 
of  January  17th,  15G2.  Incomplete  and  unsatisfactory  as  it 
was,  the  "  Edict  of  January,"  as  it  was  henceforth  known, 
became  the  charter  of  Protestant  liberties,  continually  in- 
fringed upon  by  the  kings,  under  the  influence  of  their  oppo- 
nents, but  continually  demanded  and  vindicated  by  argument, 
and,  when  need  be,  by  the  sword. 

The  Guises,  however,  had  no  thought  of  submitting  pas- 
sively to  the  execution  of  so  tolerant  a  law.  They  Merc 
resolved  to  destroy  the  edict  with  the  sword.  It  matters  little 
in  the  eye  of  the  impartial  judge  of  their  conduct  whether  the 
massacre  at  Yassy,  (March  1st,  1502,)  within  six  weeks  of  the 
promulgation  of  that  edict,  was  long  premeditated,  or  an  acci- 
dental occurrence,  as  they  and  their  advocates  maintained. 
The  crusade  against  Protestantism  in  Prance  was  premedi- 
tated, whether  the  act  with  which  it  was  to  be  commenced  had 
been  included  in  the  plan  or  not.  It  is  idle  seriously  to  dis- 
cuss the  problem  whether  the  conspirators  who  had  laid  the 
explosive  train   intended  to  lire  it  at  one  point  or  another. 

turning  to  tho  quarter  whence  it  came,  "faithful  ih'js  arc  needed  in  t;.c  Lord's 
meepfold  to  bark  at  ravening  wolves." — Fragmentary  MS.  in  the  Collection  of  the  late 
Col.  Henri  Tronchin,  Laum,  vol.  ii,  p.  238. 


3SS  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [July, 

Their  guilt  is  not  affected  by  a  mere  prudential  question. 
They  thought  it  best,  however,  to  prevent  the  German  Prot- 
estants from  lending  assistance  in  the  coming  contest  to  their 
French  brethren.  And  Cardinal  Charles  of  Lorraine  believed 
that  he  had  discovered  a  capital  method  of  accomplishing  this. 
lie  would  sow  discord  between  the  two  by  persuading  the 
German  princes  that  the  Huguenots  were  in  no  sense  their 
brethren  in  the  faith,  while  he  and  his  brothers  were  really 
perfectly  in  accord  with  the  Lutherans  on  every  essential 
point.  And  so  early  in  the  February  that  intervened  between 
the  promulgation  of  the  edict  and  the  affair  of  Vassy  four 
Guise  brothers  began  their  pilgrimage  to  the  borders  of  Ger- 
many— Duke  Francis,  Cardinal  Charles  of  Lorraine,  Cardinal 
John  of  Guise,"  and  the  Grand  Prior  of  the  Knights  of  St. 
John.  In  the  little  town  of  Saverne,  in  Alsace,  not  far  from 
Strasbourg,  they  met  Duke  Christopher  of  Wnrtemberg,  who 
came,  as  they  had  invited  him  to  come,  accompanied  by  two 
of  his  theologians,  Brentius  and  Andrea.  An  interview  of 
several  days'  duration  ensued,  in  which  the  Guises  surpassed 
every  previous  effort  of  their  own  in  dissimulation.  "  The 
Cardinal  of  Lorraine,"  says  Mr.  White,  "twice  preached  ser- 
mons so  Lutheran  in  spirit  that  his  open  adoption  of  the  Con- 
fession of  Augsburg  was  eagerly  looked  for ;  and  the  language 
of  the  Duke  of  Guise  and  his  brother  Charles  in  their  confer- 
ences with  Duke  Christopher  and  his  chancellor,  Prentz,  is  so 
extraordinary,  and,  as  regards  Duke  Francis,  so  unlike  what 
we  read  of  him  at  other  times,  as  almost  to  shake  our  faith  in 
the  genuineness  of  the  report  of  the  conference."  f 

We  should  not  be  surprised  at  Mr.  White's  partial  skepti- 
cism were  it  not  that  there  is,  as  we  shall  see,  no  doubt  what- 
ever that  the  transaction  is  faithfully  related.  The  acting  was 
certainly  clumsy,  and  the  disguises  too  flimsy  to  answer  their 
ends.  Soon  after  tliey  met,  the  Duke  of  Guise  held  a  long 
conversation  with  the  Duke  of  Wnrtemberg,  in  which  he  en- 
deavored to  persuade  him  that  the  unhappy  situation  of  France 

♦  There  has  arisen  considerable  confusion  in  the-  histories  from  the  circumstance 

that  two  of  the   brothers  were  Cardinal.-;.     It  was  John,  not  Charles,  who  was 
present  with  the  Duko  at  Vassy.     II"  died  in  1578,  at  the  early  age  of  forty-eight, 

J'c-t  the  last  of  the  six  brothers.     From  his  convivial  habits,  I'Estoile  tells  us,  he 
had  earned  the  cognomen  of  "  Ie  Cardinal  des  Boutcillcs."     Memoirs,  p.  9C 
f  White,  ISC. 


1S09J  Massacre  of  St,  Bartholomew.  380 

resulted  in  great  part  from  the  position  of  the  Huguenot  min- 
isters, whose  unconciliatory  demeanor  had  rendered  abortive 
the  Colloquy  of  Poissy.  Wurtemberg  did  not  suffer  the  cal- 
umny to  pass  unchallenged,  for  he  replied  that  the  very  ac- 
counts of  the  Colloquy  sent  him  by  Guise  proved  that  the 
unsuccessful  issue  was  due  to  the  Prelates,  who  had  come  de- 
termined  to  prevent  any  accord.  He  ascribed  the  misfortunes 
of  France  rather  to  the  persecutions  which  had  been  exercised 
on  so  many  guiltless  persons.  "  I  cannot  refrain  from  telling 
you,1'  he  added,  "that  you  and  your  brother  are  strongly  sus- 
pected in  Germany  of  having  contributed  to  cause  the  death, 
since  the  decease  of  Henry  II.,  and  even  before,  in  his  life- 
time, of  several  thousands  of  persons,  who  have  been  miserably 
executed  on  account  of  their  faith.  As  a  friend,  and  as  a 
Christian,  I  must  warn  you.  Beware,  beware  of  innocent 
blood  !  Otherwise  the  punishments  of  God  will  fall  upon  you 
in  this  life  and  in  the  next."  "  He  answered  me,"  writes 
Duke  Christopher  himself,  "with  great  sighs,  'I  know  that 
my  lu-other  and  1  are  accused  of  that,  and  of  many  other  things 
too  ;  but  we  are  wronged,  as  we  shall  both  of  us  explain  to  you 
before  we  leave.' "  The  Cardinal's  profession  of  faith,  espe- 
cially on  the  matter  of  the  presence  in  the  sacrament,  was 
equally  politic.  He  acknowledged  that  his  party  went  too  far 
in  calling  the  mass  a  sacrifice  for  the  living  and  the  dead. 
The  mass  was  not  a  sacrifice,  but  a  commemoration  of  the  sac- 
rifice offered  on  the  altar  of  the  cross,  (non  sacrificium,  sed  me- 
moria  sacrificii  praestiti  in  ara  crucis.)  With  a  solemn  appeal 
to  God,  he  declared  that  he  heartily  approved' of  tho  Augs- 
burg Confession.  "But,"  said  he,  u I  am  compelled  still  to 
dissemble  for  a  time,  that.  I  may  gain  some  that  are  feeble  in 
the  faith."  A  little  later  he  adverted  to  Wurtem berg's  re- 
marks to  Guise,  and  said,  "  You  informed  my  brother  that  in 
Germany  we  are  both  of  us  suspected  of  having  contributed 
to  the  execution  of  a  large  number  of  innocent  Christians 
during  the  reigns  of  Henry  and  of  Francis  II.  Well,  J  swear 
to  von,  in  the  name  of  God,  my  Creator,  and  pledging  the 
salvation  of  my  soul,  that  1  am  guilty  of  the  death  of  no  man 
condemned  for  relig ion's  sake.  Those  who  were  then  privy  to 
the  deliberations  of  state  can  testify  in  my  favor."  Likewise 
protested  the  Duke  of  Guise,  "  with  great  oaths."  After  such 
Foubth  Series,  Vol.  XXI.— 25 


390  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [Jub'? 

fair  assurances  respecting  the  past,  it  is  not  astonishing  that 
when  Wurtemherg  repeated  his  warning  in  relation  to  the 
future  both  the  Cardinal  and  the  Duke  gave  him  their  right 
hands,  and  pledged  their  princely  faith  and  the  salvation  of 
their  souls  that,  neither  openly  nor  secretly,  would  they  perse- 
cute the  partisans  o^  the  "  new  doctrines."  Nor  is  it  strange 
that  when  Christopher  of  Wurtemherg  came  to  read  over  his 
memorandum  of  the  conference  with  the  Lorraine  brothers,  in 
the  light  of  the  events  that  transpired  only  about  a  fortnight 
later,  he  added  to  his  manuscript  this  brief  comment :  "Alas! 
it  can  now  be  seen  how  they  have  kept  these  promises.  Deus 
sit  xilior  doli  ct  perjurii,  cujus  namque  res  agitur  /" 

Notwithstanding  the  remarkable  character  of  the  professions 
and  assurances  made  by  the  Guises,  there  is,  as  we  have  already 
said,  no  reasonable  ground  for  even  that  amount  of  uncertainty 
respecting  the  authenticity  of  the  document  containing  them 
which  Mr.  "White  expresses.  The  manuscript  account  drawn 
up  by  the  Duke  of  Wurtemherg  himself  was  discovered  by 
Sattler,  and  printed  in  his  "  Geschichte  von  "Wurtemherg  unter 
den  Herzcegen."  It  has  been  translated  into  French,  and 
published  in  the  "Bulletin  do  la  Societe  de  l'Histoire  du  Pro- 
testantisme  Francois,"  (1S56,  vol.  iv,  pp.  J  S4— 190.)  If,  in  spite 
of  Sattler's  authority,  the  document  be  suspected  of  being  a 
forgery,  the  following  circumstances  will,  we  presume,  dissi- 
pate that  suspicion.  This  was  by  no  means  the  first  time  that 
the  Cardinal  of  Lorraine,  although  notoriously  the  leader  of  the 
persecutions  in  France  for  many  years,  had  the  effrontery  to 
pretend  that  he  was  an  advocate  of  toleration;  and  this  even 
with  those  who  knew  him  better  than  did  Christopher  of 
Wurtcmbeig,  and  who  saw  at  a  glance  through  his  paltry 
lying.  As  early  as  September  10,  1559,  Sir  Nicholas  Throk- 
morton  wrote  to  Queen  Elizabeth  from  the  French  court, 
"I  am  informed  that  they  here  have  begun  to  persecute  again 
for  religion  more  than  ever  they  did;  and  that  at  Paris  there 
are  three  or  four  executed  for  the  same,  and  divers  great  per- 
sonages threatened  shortly  to  be  called  to  answer  for  their 
religion.  Wherein  the  Cardinal  of  Lorraine  having 
spoken  unto,  within  these  two  daies,  bathe  said,  that  it  is  not  his 
fault c ;  and  that  there  is  no  man  that  more  hateth  extn 
then  (than)  he  dothe  ;  and  yet  it  is  knownc,  thai  it  is}  notwith- 


1869.3  Massacre  of  St,  Bartholomew.  391 

standing,  altogether  ly  his  occasion" *  A  few  months  later, 
in  February  1560,  the  same  prelate  indulged  in  a  strain  of 
similar  hypocrisy  in  conversation  with  the  embassador  himself, 
much  to  the  good  knight's  disgust.  He  declared  himself  in 
favor  of  a  general  council,  and  spoke  with  satisfaction  of  an  edict 
just  dispatched  by  Francis  and  Mary  to  Scotland,  "  to  sur- 
cease the  punishment  of  men  for  religion."  "And  of  this 
purpose,"  adds  Throkmorton  with  pardonable  sarcasm,  "he 
made  suche  an  oration  as  it  were  long  to  write,  evon  as  thoughe 
he  had  hem  hired  uy  the  Protectants  to  defend  their  cause 
earnestly  !  "  f  Xot  only,  however,  does  the  course  of  the  Car- 
dinal of  Lorraine  in  previous  years  show  that  sucb  immoderate 
dissimulation  as  he  is  said  to  have  exhibited  at  Saverne  was 
not  foreign  to  his  character,  but  fortunately  there  is  a  well- 
known  letter,  written  by  Christopher  of  Wurtemberg,  which 
furnishes  irrefragable  proof  of  the  authenticity  and  credibility  of 
the  report  of  the  conference.  After  the  massacre  of  Vassy  the 
Duke  of  Wurtemberg  wrote  to  the  Duke  of  Guise  a  long  letter 
which  has  come  down  to  us.  In  this  he  reminds  him  of  the 
advice  he  had  given  him,  and  of  the  asseverations  he  had  re- 
ceived in  return.  A  single  sentence  will  suflice  to  put  the 
matter  beyond  controversy.  "  You  know  also,"  he  says,  "  with 
what  assurance  you  answered  me  that  great  injustice  was  done 
youy  in  that  the  attempt  was  made  to  represent  you  as  the  cause 
and  author  of  the  death  of  so  many  poor  Christians  who  have 
heretofore  shed  their  blood,"  etc.,  (epie  Ton  vous  faisoit  grand 
tort  de  ce  que  l'on  vous  vouloit  imposer  estrc  cause  et  autheur 
de  la  mort  de  tant  de  povres  Chrestiens,  etc.)  X 

In  conclusion,  we  must  say  that  Mr.  White's  book,  although 
written  principally  with  the  design  of  elucidating  the  events 
immediately  preceding  the  catastrophe  of  the  Massacre  of 
St.  F.artholomew,  and  of  exhibiting  in  their  true  relation  the 
successive  acts  of  that  remarkable  tragedy,  furnishes  a  very 
readable,  satisfactory,  and  trustworthy  account  of  the  early 
history  of  the  Protestants  of  France.  We  may  hereafter  take 
occasion  to  examine  the  main  portion  of  his  interesting  work, 
and  the  views  it  presents  of  the  premeditation  of  the  conspiracy 
of  the  "  bloody  nuptials." 

*  Forbes'  Full  View,  vol.  i,  p.  22G.  f  Forbes,  vol.  i,  p.  S37. 

%  Mc'moires  do  Guise,  (Midland,)  p.  491. 


392  Application,  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [Jul; 


Art.  V.— THE    APPLICATION    OF    PHOTO  Gil  APIIY    TO 
ASTRONOMY. 

About  twenty-live  years  ago  a  leading  English  magazine,  in 
speaking  of  the  invention  of  Daguerre,  paid  it  the  poor  com- 
pliment of  saying  that  "  though  now  of  some  half  dozen 
years'  growth  it  is  still  '  so  little  of  its  age  '  that  it  threatens  to 
be  a  dwarf  the  longest  day  it  lives."  Though  so  unpromising 
at  that  period  of  its  existence,  the  art  of  photography  has  since 
compelled  a  recognition  of  its  services,  not  only  as  a  means  of 
gratifying  our  love  for  the  beautiful,  but  as  of  much  practical 
use  in  the  arts  and  sciences.  To  the  progress  of  astronomy  it 
lias  begun  to  render  very  material  aid.  Its  possible  services 
in  this  science  are  very  obvious.  If  fleeting  phenomena  and 
transitory  phases  which  disappear  too  soon  to  admit  of  careful 
study  with  the  eye  can  by  photography  be  permanently  de- 
lineated, they  may  then  be  examined  and  measured  at  leisure. 
If  the  appearance  of  a  celestial  object  as  revealed  by  the 
powerful  telescopes  of  to-day  can  be  made  to  impress  itself 
distinctly  upon  the  sensitive  plate  of  a  camera,  we  shall  have  a 
record  more  accurate  than  any  skill  of  the  eye  and  hand  can 
produce,  serving  not  only  for  present  study,  but  for  comparison 
with  the  aspect  presented  by  the  same  object  many  years 
hence.  If  the  sidereal  heavens  can  by  their  own  agency  be 
made  to  map  themselves  for  our  use,  correctly  registering  both 
position  and  magnitude,  astronomers  will  be  saved  much 
tedious  labor  and  many  troublesome  mistakes.  "We  design  to 
show  briefly  how  far  and  with  what  success  this  application  of 
photography  to  the  science  of  astronomy  has  been  made. 

"When  Daguerre  in  1S39  exhibited  his  method  of  fixing  on  a 
metallic  plate  the  image  of  objects  by  means  of  solar  light, 
Arago  was  the  first  to  predict  the  application  of  the  discovery 
to  the  science  of  astronomy;  and  at  his  request  Daguerre 
attempted  to  obtain  a  photographic  representation  of  the  moon, 
but  did  not  succeed.  Other  attempts  were  also  made  by  dif- 
ferent parties;  but  though  the  plate  was  in  some  cases  ex; 
to  the  brilliant  image  formed  by  a  powerful  reflecting  telescope 
twenty  times  as  long  as  would  sullicc  for  terrestrial  objects,  it 
failed  to  receive  the  slightest  impression.     The  first  to  obtain 


1S09.]      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  393 

any  thing  like  a  distinct  representation  of  the  moon,  was  Dr. 
J.  W.  Draper,  of  ]S"ew  York,'"'  who,  as  early  us  1SI0,  obtained 
a  picture  with  a  five  inch  lens  by  an  exposure  of  twenty 
minutes.  In  1S50  Professor  G.  P.  Bond,  of  Cambridge,  by 
the  aid  of  his  large  refractor,  produced  some  fine  impressions 
of  the  lunar  surface,  and  subsequently  of  some  of  the  double 
.-tars  of  the  first  and  second  magnitudes.  It  was  one  of  Pro- 
fessor Bond's  lunar  photographs  at  the  London  Exhibition  in 
lb51  which  stimulated  Sir  Warren  De  La  Rue,  who  has  since 
become  famous  in  celestial  photography,  to  undertake  similar 
experiments.  But  little  progress,  however,  was  made  in 
astronomical  photography  until  1857,  when,  the  chemistry  of 
the  art  having  been  much  improved  and  more  sensitive  proc- 
esses devised,  Mr.  De  La  Rue,  in  England,  renewed  his  experi- 
ments in  this  direction,  and  in  the  following  year  Messrs.  Lewis 
M.  Rutherford  and  Henry  Draper,  of  New  York,  began  to  de- 
vote their  attention  to  the  subject,  and  have  since  prosecuted 
it  with  noted  success.  In  1S57  the  time  of  exposure  for  fixing 
the  image  of  the  moon  was  diminished  from  twenty  minutes 
to  less  than  half  as  many  seconds.  "When  the  condition  of  the 
atmosphere  is  favorable,  a  distinct  impression  of  the  full  moon 
can  now  be  taken  in  less  than  a  quarter  of  a  second,  and  the 
planet  Jupiter  requires  an  exposure  only  twice  as  long. 

In  taking  celestial  photographs  the  telescope  is  used  as  the 
camera,  the  sensitive  plate  being  usually  placed  in  the  focus 
of  the  object-glass  or  mirror,  and  receiving  the  image  directly 
upon  it.  From  the  impression  thus  produced  enlarged  copies 
may  be  subsequently  taken.  Sometimes  the  image  is  enlarged 
by  a  secondary  magnifier  before  it  is  received  upon  the  plate. 
Kither  the  telescope  or  plate-holder  must,  of  course,  have  a 
uniform  motion  communicated  to  it  during  the  exposure  cor- 
responding to  the  motion  of  the  object.  A  negative,  when 
obtained  with  a  clear  and  tranquil  atmosphere,  and  free  from 
all  imperfections — such  as  arc  caused  by  a  floating  atom  of 
dust,  or  the  slightest  tremor  of  the  instrument,  or  pinholes  in 
the  collodion  film-— may  be  enlarged  to  an  extent  limited  only 
by  the  difficulties  of  manipulating  enormous  plates.  And  thus 
we  have  for  deliberate  examination  and  measurement  by  day- 

'  *Ou  the  Construction  find  Use  of  a  Siiv..-rt-<l  Gla^s  Toledo.'!".',  by  Hoary  Draper, 
•«•»,  p.  33. 


394-         Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July 

light  a  permanent  aud  infallible  record  of  the  phases  of  a 
celestial  body — a  record  written  by  itself.  A  high  slate  of 
perfection  is  essential  in  the  original  negative;  for  as  def 
are  magnified  equally  with  the  rest,  a  fault  imperceptible  in  a 
small  picture  may  become  a  serious  flaw  in  an  enlarged  one. 
The  enlargement  may  be  carried  so  far  as  to  make  apparent 
the  minute  granules  of  deposited  silver  used  in  the  photographic 
process;  but  here  is  an  end  to  the  advantage  gained  by  increase 
of  size,  no  more  detail  being  furnished  by  any  further  enlarge- 
ment. When,  however,  the  original  image  is  enlarged  before 
it  is  impressed  on  the  sensitive  plate,  this  limit  of  magnified 
detail  is  removed. 

The  chemical  rays,  which  alone  are  effective  in  producing 
photographic  impressions,  being  more  refrangible  than  the 
luminous  rays,  a  lens  adapted  to  converge  the  latter  to  a  focus 
will  not  concentrate  the  former;  and  hence  a  glass  constructed 
for  optical  purposes  is  defective  for  photography,  the  photo- 
graphic image  being  too  ill-defined  to  bear  much  enlargement. 
Though  this  objection  does  not  lie  against  the  reflecting  tel- 
escope, which  throws  all  the  various  rays  to  the  same  focus,  yet 
tire  least  tremor  of  the  instrument  being  multiplied  so  many 
times  by  the  double,  reflection  constitutes  an  obstacle  to  its 
successful  use  not  easily  overcome.  Mr.  Rutherford,  after  ex- 
periencing these  and  other  difficulties  with  both  forms  of  the 
telescope,  and  trying  in  vain  to  obviate  them,  conceived  the 
plan  of  constructing  a  new  object-glass,  corrected  solely  with 
reference  to  the  photographic  rays.  Such  a  glass  was  com- 
pleted in  December  1SU-J,  and,  though  utterly  worthless  i'ov 
vision,  proved  to  be  very  superior  for  photographic  pur] 
With  this  lens  the  necessary  time  of  exposure  of  the  sensitive 
plate  was  diminished  more  than  ten  times  by  the  complete 
concentration  of  the  chemical  rays.  A  photograph  of  the 
moon,  twenty-one  inches  in  diameter,  taken  with  this  new 
objective  March  G,  1865,  (three  days  after  the  moon's  first 
quarter,)  is  remarkably  (dear,  and  shows  great  sharpness  of 
detail  almost  to  the  very  c(]>j:e.  Mr.  De  La  Rue,  who  has 
been  called  the  first  of  celestial  photographers,  and  who  in 
1SCG  received  from  the  French  Academy  the  Lalande  prize 
for  the  perfection  to  which  he  has  carried  the  art,  gracefully 
yields  the  scepter  in  lunar  photography  to  Mr.  Rutherfurd, 


1SG0.J       Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  305 

and  acknowledges  this  picture  to  be  superior  to  any  produced 
by  himself.  Mr.  Brothers,  another  English  photographer, 
says  in  regard  to  it,  "It  is  difficult  to  conceive  that  any  thing 
superior  can  ever  be  obtained."  It  seems  fitting  that  America, 
which  gave  origin  to  celestial  photography,  should  still  wear 
the  palm.  Professor  Henry  Draper,  who  has  so  successfully 
prosecuted  this  branch  of  photography  with  his  silvered  glass 
reflecting  telescope,  has  produced  a  lunar  photograph  over 
four  feet  in  diameter,  which,  indeed,  presents  an  imposing- 
appearance,  though  it  gives  no  more  detail  than  if  magnified 
to  only  half  that  size,  on  account  of  the  silver  granulation 
becoming  visible.  He  has  also  taken  photographs  of  the  sun 
which  exhibit  details  that  were  "  almost  invisible  to  observa- 
tion," and  some  of  which  show  the  precipitate-like  or  minute 
flocculent  appearance  of  the  solar  disk  described  by  Sir  John 
Herschel.  I)e  La  Eue  has  obtained  solar  photographs  three 
feet  in  diameter,  taken  instantaneously,  which  (he  says)  repre- 
sent the  sun's  surface  as  though  it  had  an  undulatory  motion, 
"  like  the  surface  of  the  sea  agitated  by  wind."  The  planets 
also  have  given  us  their  photographs,  in  which  the  rings  of 
Saturn,  the  belts  of  Jupiter  and  his  satellites,  the  snow  zones 
and  other  markings  of  Mars,  are  shown  remarkably  well.  The 
brilliant  comet  of  Donati,  which  appeared  in  1S5S,  impressed 
itself  on  the  plate  in  an  exposure  of  seven  seconds.  Mi".  Ruther- 
furd  has  produced  a  very  line  photograph  of  the  solar  spectrum 
embracing  both  the  luminous  and.  chemical  rays,  and  showing 
the  numerous  Fraunhofer  lines  with  great  distinctness. 

We  have  stated  that  the  image  of  the  full  moon  can  be  fixed 
in  less  than  one  fourth  of  a  second,  and  that  of  the  sun  "  in- 
stantaneously." The  actual  time  required  to  produce  a  solar 
photograph  has  been  measured,  and  the  resull  is  indicative  of 
the  remarkable  perfection  to  which  photography  has  attained. 
According  to  the  experiments  of  Mr.  Waterhouse,  a  space  of 
time  no  longer  than  one  twenty-seven-thousandth  of  a  second 
is  required  to  fix  the  solar  image."  Even  this  small  fraction 
however,  inconceivably  short  as  it.  appears,  is  a  tolerable  length 
of  time  compared  with  that  in  which  photographs  are  taken  by 
the  electric  Hash.  The  duration  of  the  illuminating  spark, 
according  to  the  beautiful  and  trustworthy  experiments  of  Mr. 

*  Annual  of  Scientific  Discovery  lor  18C0,  p.  1G2. 


39G  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July, 

Wheatstone  with  his  delicate  chronoseopc,  does  not  exceed  the 
mUZionth  part  of  a  secondhand  yet  a  clear  and  distinct  pho- 
tographic image  is  obtained  by  a  single  electric  discharge.  13y 
this  means  may  be  shown  the  real  form  of  objects  to  which  a 
deceptive  appearance  is  given  by  their  rapid  movement.  If  a 
wheel  on  whose  side  any  figure  is  drawn  in  conspicuous  lines 
be  made  to  rotate  with  the  greatest  possible  velocity,  the  figure 
will  present  to  the  eye  only  a  series  of  concentric  bands  of  dif- 
ferent shades.  Let  it  now  be  photographed  while  in  motion 
by  the  electric  flash,  and  the  wheel  will  appear  stationary  with 
the  figure  perfectly  well  defined.  A  vein  of  water  issuing 
from  a  small  orifice,  which  appears  to  the  eye  as  smooth  as  a 
stem  of  crystal,  if  seen  or  photographed  by  the  light  of  the 
electric  discharge,  is  shown  to  be  composed  of  drops  variously 
disposed  and  of  various  forms,  some  being  elongated,  others 
flattened,  and  others  almost  spherical,  f 

A  series  of  photographs  may  be  taken  at  inappreciable  inter- 
vals, which  will  exhibit  the  birth,  marked  phases  of  existence, 
and  extinction  of  an  act  or  event  much  too  fleeting  to  be  per- 
ceived by  the  unaided  eye.  And  thus  photography,  in  its  highest 
instantaneousness  appears  to  eternize  time,  making  momentary 
epochs,  otherwise  inappreciable,  as  evident  to  our  senses  as  the 
presence  of  animalculae  in  blood  or  water  is  by  a  microscope.}: 
This  idea  recalls  the  antipodal  one  of  General  0.  M.  Mitchell's, 
who,  in  describing  the  slow  oscillatory  motion  of  the  ecliptic, 
which  takes  many  thousands  of  years  to  perform  a  complete 
vibration,  compared  it  to  "  a  great  pendulum  in  the  heavens, 
swinging  to  and  fro,  healing  the  seconds  of  eternity  J"  § 

But  let  us  glance  at  some  of  the  results  which  have  been 
obtained  by  the  application  of  photography  to  astronomy,  and 
note  their  bearing  in  confirming  and  extending  our  knowledge 
of  the  science.  The  moon  does  not  always  present  exactly  the 
same  face  toward  the  earth,  but  within  certain  limits  seems  to 
rock  upon  its  center,  at  one  time  turning  one  limb  a  little 
toward  us,  and  at  another  time  another;  or,  to  use  the  figure 

*  JonrnrJ  of  Franklin  Institute,  v<  1.  :<vii,  p.  144. 

f  Smithsonian  Report,  1  366,  p.  215. 

t  Annua!  ofScient  ry  for  1S60,  p.  Ml. 

§  A  Frencu  writer  expresses  nearly  the  same  thought  as  follows:  "Inunenses 
pendules  de  I'&ernite'  qui  b&ttent  lea  eieclos  commes  k-s  uotrcs  battent  I03 
Becondes." 


1809.]       Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  397 

symbolized  in  the  almanac.-,  and  lijcening  the  full  moon  to  a 
human  face,  it  turns  so  as  to  present  sometimes  more  and 
sometimes  less  of  one  cheek  than  of  the  other,  and  again  more 
or  less  of  the  forehead  than  of  the  chin.  The  measurement  of 
this  libration,  as  the  phenomenon  is  called,  has  long  taxed  the 
patience  and  ingenuity  of  observers,  but  with  photography  its 
determination  is  at  once  comparatively  easy  and  exceedingly 
accurate.  Mr.  De  La  Hue's  lunar  photographs,  enlarged  to 
thirty-nine  inches,  give  such  accurate  micrometrical  measure- 
ments as  to  furnish  precise  data  for  determining  the  amount  of 
libration.  The  photographs  of  the  moon  taken  by  him  and  by 
Mr.  Iiutherfurd  under  different  states  of  libration  and  illumi- 
nation, are  employed  as  the  foundation  of  the  great  lunar  map 
now  being  prepared  under  the  auspices  of  the  British  Associa- 
tion for  the  Advancement  of  Science  on  the  colossal  scale  of 
two  hundred  inches  to  the  moon's  diameter.  As  every  prin- 
cipal object  on  the  photographs  will  be  transferred  by  measure- 
ment to  the  map,  a  degree  of  accuracy  will  thus  be  secured 
far  beyond  that  which  the  best  charts  now  present. 

An  eminent  astronomer  has  declared  tbat  in  rectifying  our 
knowledge  of  the  moon,  more  has  been  accomplished  by  photog- 
raphy in  one  hour  than  by  forty  years'  observations  of  occulta- 
tions.  Let  us  see  how  this  lias  been  done,  at  least  in  part.  Dur- 
ing the  total  eclipse  of  the  sun  in  li>G0,  which  was  visible  in  a  part 
of  Europe  and  Africa, a  number  of  photographicimpressions 
were  taken  by  Mr.  De  La  Hue  representing  the  different  si 
of  the  eclipse  with  remarkable  exactness.  A  micrometrical 
examination  of  these  photographs  indicated  the  moon's  di- 
ameter to  be  less  by  about  four  seconds  than  that  determined 
by  the  instruments  of  the  Royal  Observatory  at  Greenwich. 
A  rigid  investigation  of  star  occultations  shows  that  the  mean 
diameter  of  the  moon  when  bright  is  apparently  four  seconds 
greater  than  when  dark.  Sole -Ling  from  a  long  series  of  ob- 
servations those  which  it  is  known- give  the  most  reliable  re- 
sults, namely,  the  disappearance  of  .-tars  at  the  dark  edge  of 
the  moon  and  their  reappearance  at  the  dark  ed^v,  Mr.  (i.  J). 
Airy,  the  Astronomer  Royal,  has  deduced  the  value  ol'  the 
moon's  diameter,  which  confirms  even  to  a  hundreth  pari 
of  a  second  that  obtained  from  the  measurements  of  the  pho- 
tographs, thus  showing  that  the  photographic  record  furnishes 


39S  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.        \  July, 

as  good  a  basis  for  calculation  as  the  most  delicate  astronom- 
ical observations.  Mr.  Airy  thinks  this  discrepancy  of  four 
seconds  between  the  diameters  of  the  full  and  new  moon  is 
due,  certainly  in  part,  if  nut  wholly,  to  the  irradiation  of  its 
bright  surface,  but  remarks  that  even  if  the  whole  of  it  were 
supposed  to  be  caused  by  a  lunar  atmosphere,  its  tenuity  must 
be  so  great  that  it  would  probably  be  discoverable  in  no  other 
way.  Its  density  would  be  only  one  two-thousandth  part  of  the 
earth's  atmosphere.* 

An  interesting  fact  connected  with  the  photographs  of  the 
solar  eclipse  referred  to  is,  that  they  reveal  more  than  could 
be  observed  by  direct  vision — the  eye  of  photography  caught 
what  was  invisible  to  the  human  eye.  During  a  total  solar 
eclipse  there  are  seen  jutting  out  beyond  the  edge  of  the 
moon's  disk  various  flame-like  protuberances,  usually  rose- 
colored,  which  have  excited  much  interest  among  all  observers. 
One  of  these  "  flames,"  not  sufficiently  luminous  to  be  seen 
with  the  telescope,  was  by  the  predominance  of  actinic  rays 
distinctly  impressed  on  the  sensitive  plate.  "  It  probably 
emitted,"  says  De  La  Rue,  "  a  feeble  purple  light."  Others 
of  these  colored  prominences  were  better  defined  on  the  pho- 
tographs than  to  the  eye.  Owing  to  the  discordance  between 
previous  observations  of  these  phenomena,  it  had  been  a  dis- 
puted question  whether  their  appearance  is  connected  with  the 
sun  or  the  satellite,  and  different  theories  had  been  proposed 
to  meet  each  view  of  the  case.  The  various  photographs  of 
this  eclipse  (taken  at  different  localities)  furnished  a  consistent 
and  reliable  record  which  at  once  and  conclusively  settled  the 
fact  that  these  red  flames  belong  to  the  sun,  and  arc  entirely 
independent  of  the  moon.  Recent  investigations  with  the 
spectroscope  prove  that  they  consist  of  incandescent  gaseous 
matter  (chiefly  hydrogen)  extending  into  the  upper  regions  of 
the  solar  atmosphere.  They  are  visible  only  during  an  eclipse, 
because  under  ordinary  circumstances  their  light  is  less  brilliant 
than  that  of  our  atmosphere  illuminated  by  the  sun.  Photo- 
graphic observations  of  the  solar  eclipse,  which  occurred  la  t 
August  were  taken  at  several  stations,  which,  though  the  Btate 
of  the  atmosphere  was  somewhat  unfavorable,  furnish  somi 
very  interesting  results.  A  complete  discussion  of  them  will 
*  Monthly  Notices  of  tho  R.  A.  .?.,  vol.  xxv,  u.  2C4. 


18G9.1      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  390 

soon  be  published  in  the  Philosophical  Transactions  of  the 
Royal  Society. 

The  wonderful  power  of  the  stereoscope  lias  been  applied  to 
celestial  photographs  with  the  most  marked  and  beautiful  re- 
sults. It  is  well  known  that  this  simple  instrument  exhibits 
effects  which  a  simple  picture  cannot  produce.  The  two 
pictures  on  a  stereoscopic  slide,  it  will  be  observed,  are  photo- 
graphs of  the  same  object  from  two  different  positions,  varying 
from  each  other  more  or  less  according  to  the  distance  and  size 
of  the  object,  one  picture  corresponding  to  its  appearance  as 
seen  by  the  right  eye,  the  other  as  seen  by  the  left  eye.  Now 
if,  instead  of  moving  the  camera  in  taking  the  two  impressions, 
the  object  itself  should  change  its  position,  or  simply  turn  in  its 
place  a  few  degrees,  evidently  the  same  effect  would  be  pro- 
duced as  before.  Thus  two  photographs  of  a  celestial  object 
may  possess  the  stereoscopic  relation  if  taken  with  an  interval 
sufficiently  great  to  admit  of  the  nccc-sary  angular  change  in 
its  position.  For  instance,  De  La  Rue  photographed  a  con- 
spicuous spot  on  the  solar  disk;  then  waiting  about  twenty- 
four  hours  till  the  sun's  rotation  on  its  axis  should  present  the 
spot  under  a  little  different  phase,  he  took  another  photograph 
of  it,  and  placing  the  two  in  a  stereoscope,  the  one  last  taken 
being  on  the  left,  they  showed  the  true  relative  position  of  the 
various  parts  connected  with  the  spot.  In  this  we  see  a  con- 
firmation of  the  theory,  first  asserted  so  boldly  by  Dr.  Wilson 
nearly  a  century  ago,  that  the  spots  arc  immense  openings  or 
caverns  in  the  luminous  envelope  of  the  sun.  The  faculai  or 
bright  parts  of  the  disk  immediately  surrounding  the  spot,  arc 
shown  by  tin's  stereoscopic  view  to  be  portions  of  the  luminous 
matter  heaped  up  above  the  grosser  part  of  the  solar  atmos- 
phere. The  penumbra  is  represented  at  a  groat  distance  below 
the  outer  surface  of  this  luminous  envelope  or  photosphere, 
while  the  central  black  nucleus  appears  to  be  an  opi 
through  the  penumbra  down  to  the  opaque  orb  within,  or 
rather  to  still  darker  masses  of  clouds  which  surround  it.* 
The  solar  t-pots,  according  to  M.  Faye,  indicate  the  tliicl 
of  the  luminous  envelope  to  be  from  two  to  join-  thoi 
miles;  variable,  it  is  thought,  with  the  latitude.  After  n 
ing  the  above  experiment  with  a  sun  spot, Mr.  Do  La  Rim 
*  Pl.il.  Trans.,  1862,  Part  I,  \\  40G. 


400  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.      [July, 

further,  " My  hope  of  rendering  evident  the  luminous  promi- 
nences [on  the  disk  as  well  as  around  its  edge]  is  dependent 
upon  an  extension  of  this  experiment.  I  believe  that  with  a 
careful  adjustment  of  the  time  of  exposure  of  the  sensitive 
plate,  I  shall  succeed  in  obtaining  the  outline  of  the  luminous 
protuberances  (the  so-called  red  flames)  as  very  delicate  mark- 
ings on  the  more  brilliant  mottled  background  of  the  photo- 
sphere. These  delineations,  except  with  the  aid  of  the  stereo- 
scope, would  be  confounded  with  the  other  markings  of  the 
sun's  surface ;  but  they  would  assume  their  true  aspect,  and 
stand  out  from  the  rest  as  soon  as  two  suitable  pictures  were 
viewed  by  the  aid  of  that  instrument." 

Mr.  De  La  Rue  also  combined  two  photographs  of  the  total 
solar  eclipse  of  1S60,  taken  with  an  interval  of  eighty  seconds, 
and  by  an  exposure  of  one  minute  each,  which  afford  a  very 
beautiful  view  of  the  phenomena  of  totality,  and  one  which 
could  not  be  enjoyed  by  mortal  eyes  in  looking  at  the  eclipse. 
In  this  stereograph  the  dark  disk  of  the  moon,  "  hung  upon 
nothing,"  appears  of  a  spherical  form  and  comparatively  near ; 
while  far  beyond,  the  brilliant  corona  or  atmosphere  of  the 
sun,  which  is  never  seen  except  in  a  total  eclipse,  Hashes  out 
around  the  disk  revealing  the  presence  of  the  concealed  lumi- 
nous orb  in  the  distance. 

In  combining  pictures  of  the  moon  for  the  stereoscope,  two 
photographs  of  the  same  phase  are  taken,  but  with  an  interval 
of  one  or  more  months  between,  in  order  that  it  may  present 
in  the  latter  picture  its  disk  slightly  turned  from  its  position  in 
the  former,  making  the  difference  of  libration  from  live  to  ten 
degrees — the  two  pictures,  in  fact,  (placed  in  a  stereoscope,) 
representing  the  moon  exactly  as  it  would  appeal'  if  our  eyes 
could  be  separated  thirty  thousand  miles  apart  and  each  view 
the  moon  through  a  telc.-cope  at  the  same  time.  By  the  effect 
thus  produced,  the  globular  form  of  our  satellite  is  demon- 
strated as  a  physical  fact,  being  made  as  apparent  to  the  eye  as 
is  that  of  an  orange  held  in  the  hand.  The  telescope  exhibits 
the  inequalities  of  the  moon's  furrowed  surface  only  as  dif- 
ferences of  light  and  shade,  while  the  stereoscope  reveals  them 
as  actual  elevations  and  depressions,  making  as  manifest  the 
long  mountain  ranges  and  deep  valleys,  the  isolated  peaks  and 
numerous  saucer-like  cavities  or  craters,  as  they  would  be  in  a 


1S69.3      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  401 

bird's-eye  view  to  a  lunar  inhabitant,  though  of  course  lack- 
ing the  details.  With  suitable  photographs,  the  stereoscope 
is  to  the  telescope  what  the  sculptured  bust  is  to  the  painted 
portrait. 

While  a  stereoscopic  view  of  the  full  moon  brings  out  its 
rounded  form  with  astonishing  naturalness,  and  gives  one, 
perhaps,  a  better  idea  of  it  as  a  whole,  yet  a  view  of  the  moon 
only  partially  illuminated  exhibits  the  unevenness  of  surface 
along  the  limit  of  illumination  with  much  greater  distinctness 
and  beauty.  Ordinary  stereoscopic  pictures  of  the  moon 
represent  it  as  magnified  from  twenty  to  twenty-five  times ;  a 
common  stereoscope  farther  magnifies  it  about  one  and  a  half 
times,  so  that  it  is  seen  under  a  power  of  about  thirty-live. 
Views  enlarged  to  a  greater  size,  with  instruments  adapted  to 
them,  would  probably  reveal  minuter  details  of  the  diversified 
surface. 

Photographs  of  the  moon  daring  the  lunar  eclipse  of  October 
1865  were  found  to  be  in  stereoscopic  relation  with  those  taken 
during  the  eclipse  of  February  185S,  (forming  a  stereoscopic 
angle  which  a  measurement  of  the  pictures  indicates  to  be 
about  five  and  a  half  degrees.)  so  that,  when  combined  with 
each  other,  we  have  stereoscopic  views  of  various  phases  of  a 
lunar  eclipse  which  present  a  very  novel  appearance.  Strictly 
speaking,  the  moon  is  never  full  except  at  the  time  of  a  lunar 
eclipse.  A  picture  of  it  taken  at  any  other  time  will  appear 
more  or  less  jagged  at  some  part  of  its  edge.  This  view  oi' 
the  moon  lying  before  me,  taken  just  before  contact  with  the 
earth's  shadow,  placed  in  a  stereoscope,  presents  a  clear,  smooth 
outline  around  the  entire  edge.  The  next  view  shows  the 
moon  after  contact  with  the  penumbra,  which  dims  a  snudl 
portion  of  its  disk.  In  the  third  picture,  the  muun  has  just 
entered  the  umbra,  and  in  the  fourth  it  is  half  immersed.  The 
portion  of  the  moon  covered  by  the  umbra  left  not  the  slightest 
trace  on  the  photograph,  though  it  was  plainly  visible  to  the 
unaided  eye.  The  limit  oi'  the  shadow,  which  is  gradually 
softened  off,  can  be  much  better  traced  across  the  disk  in  the 
photograph  than  as  seen  in  the  telescope,  and  it>  projection 
plainly  marks  the  circular,  or,  more  strictly,  the  elliptical  form 
of  the  earth's  shadow. 

The  configuration  of  Jupiter's  belts,   and  the  diversity  of 


402  Application  of  Ph&togrwphy  to  Astronomy.      [July, 

light  and  shade  on  the  surface  of  Mars,  have  enabled  stereo- 
graphs to  be  produced  of  those  planets,  the  presence  of  detail 
or  variety  in  the  appearance  of  a  body  being  necessary  to  their 
production.  Mr.  Do  La  Paie  hopes  to  obtain  a  stereograph 
of  Saturn  and  his  rings  by  the  aid  of  the  latter's  periodical 
change  of  appearance  in  opening  and  closing.  An  interval  of 
several  years  between  the  two  photographs  will  be  necessary. 
The  planet  itself  will  probably  present  only  the  appearance 
of  a  flat  disk  from  the  want  of  sufficient  detail  on  its  surface. 
The  same  reason  will  doubtless  be  a  bar  to  the  production  of 
satisfactory  stereographs  of  the  sun  until  the  delicate  tracings 
on  its  luminous  surface  can  be  well  defined  in  the  photographs. 
An  attempt  was  made  by  Mr.  Rutherford  to  produce,  one 
when  the  sun  was  remarkably  rich  in  spots,  but  instead  of  pre- 
senting it  in  relief  like  a  sphere,  it  gave  the  appearance  of  "a 
flat  uniform  disk  spanned  by  a  spherical  network  which  seemed 
entirely  detached  from  the  disk." 

At  Kew  Observatory,  near  London,  the  sun's  photograph — 
we  might  say  autograph — is  taken  once  or  twice  every  day 
when  the  sky  will  permit.  By  this  means  we  are  obtaining  a 
continuous  history  of  the  changes  in  the  spots  and  facuke  on 
its  face  more  accurate  and  more  instructive  than  could  be  pro- 
cured in  any  other  way.  An  investigation  of  these  sun-pic- 
tures is  fast  setting  at  rest  many  disputed  points  pertaining  to 
solar  physics.  The  existence  of  a  comparatively  cold  atmos- 
phere around  the  sun,  outside  of  the  luminous  matter,  and  the 
connection  of  the  solar  spots  with  planetary  influence,  (chiefly 
that  of  Venus  and  Jupiter,)  have  been  already  established  by 
them.  Other  questions  relating  to  spots  on  the  sun,  and  their 
connection  with  terrestrial  magnetism,  it  is  thought,  will  soon 
be  solved,  and  perhaps  also  those  concerning  the  movements 
of  the  supposed  ring  of  asteroid?  (or,  possibly,  single  planet) 
within  the  orbit  of  Mercury.  An  investigation  is  now  being 
made,  with  the  view  of  determining  with  greater  exactness  the 
angular  diameter  of  the  sun.  Two  series  of  solar  researches, 
based  on  the  Kew  photographs,  Lave  been  published,  and 
further  work  is  being  reduced  preparatory  to  a  final  discussion. 
In  view  of  the  rapid  advancement  which  has  been  made  in 
solar  physics  within  a  few  years  past  there  seems  reason  to 
hope  that  the  day  is  not  distant  when  a  satisfactory  answer 


18G9.J      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  403 

can  be  given  to  the  oft-repeated  inquiry,  "What  is  a 
sun  ? "  * 

Photography  also  renders  its  aid  in  another  essential  depart- 
ment at  Kew  Observatory.  By  its  means,  in  connection  with 
ingenious  clock-work,  all  the  various  meteorological  and  mag- 
netic instruments  automatically  record  their  momentary 
changes  throughout,  the  twenty-four  hours,  and  in  place  of 
such  old  names  as  barometer  and  thermometer,  we  see  used 
such  new  terms  as  barograph,  thermograph,  and  magneto- 
graph. 

The  Russian  government  lias  provided  the  observatory  fit 
Wilna  with  a  photoheliographie  apparatus  similar  to  that  in 
operation  at  Kew,  and  there  is  a  prospect  of  a  like  instrument 
being  erected  at  Quebec.  We  shall  thus  have,  on  account  of 
the  difference  of  longitude,  an  almost  uninterrupted  self-regis- 
ter of  solar  phenomena. 

But  perhaps  the  most  desirable  application  of  photography, 
to  the  accomplishment  of  which  the  hopes  of  astronomers  are 
strongly  turned,  is  its  employment  in  mapping  the  sidereal 
heavens.  Professor  Pond  was  the  first  to  call  attention  to  the 
advantages  offered  by  this  method  of  stellar  observation,  and 
prosecuted  numerous  experiments  of  the  kind  in  1S57  with  his 
fifteen-inch  refractor,  photographing  stars  as  small  as  the  sixth 
magnitude.  Mr.  Rutherfurd,  with  his  eleven-inch  photo- 
graphic object-glass,  has  carried  the  work  in  this  direction  to 
the  farthest  extent  yet  attained,  having  photographed  stars  of 
the  ninth  magnitude.  He  has  taken  one  cluster  of  twenty- 
three  stars  within  the  space  of  one  degree  square,  and  another 
(the  Pleiades)  of  forty-three  stars,  many  of  these  being  of  the 
ninth  magnitude,  with  an  exposure  of  three  to  four  minutes. 
"With  a  delicate  micrometer,  which  he  designed  expressly  for 
the  work,  Mr.  Rutherfurd  tool;  careful  measures  of  the  star 
images  in  his  photograph  of  the  Pleiades.  Prom  these  meas- 
ures Dr.  P.  A.  Gould  has  deduced  the  relative  position  angle-, 
and  distances  (in  arc)  of  the  stars,  and  a  comparison  of  his 

c  Recent  evidence,  furnished  by  both  the  telescope  and  spectroscope,  seema  to 
demonstrate  that  the  appearances  connectod  with  bud  Bpota  are  owing  to  the 
cooling  and  absorptive  effects  of  an  inrush  or  descending  current  of  the  sun's  atmos- 
phere, which  is  known  to  bo  cooler  than  tho  photosphere,  (See  London  Athe- 
nanira,  May,  1868,  p.  T63.) 


401  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July, 

results  with  those  obtained  by  Bessel  from  his  observations  of 
the  same  stars  proves  both  the  accuracy  of  Bessel's  measures 
and  the  trustworthiness  of  the  new  method,  while  at  the  same 
time  it  shows  the  small  amount  of  relative  change  which  has 
taken  place  in  this  group  during  the  last  quarter  of  a  century. 
The  observations  made  by  Bes>el  extended  over  more  than 
eleven  years,  while  the  observations  of  Mr.  Rutherford  were 
made  in  a  single  night.  "It  would  not  be  difficult,"  he  says. 
11  to  expose  a  surface  sufficient  to  obtain  a  map  of  two  degrees 
square,  and  with  instruments  of  larger  aperture  we  may  hope 
to  reach  much  smaller  stars  than  I  have  yet  taken.  There  is 
also  every  probability  that  the  chemistry  of  photography  will 
be  very  much  improved,  and  more  sensitive  methods  de- 
vised." * 

The  advantages  of  this  method  of  observation,  when  so  ex- 
tended as  to  apply  to  the  smaller  telescopic  stars,  as  stated  by 
Professor  Bond,  are  its  entire  immunity  from  personal  errors, 
errors  of  judgment,  or  from  want  of  skill  on  the  part  of  the 
observer,  with  less  liability  to  ordinary  mistakes  in  reading 
and  recording  the  indications  of  the  micrometer.  Besides 
which,  the  permanent  record  can  at  any  time  be  re-examined 
to  clear  up  doubtful  points.  Another  advantage,  equally  de- 
cisive, is  the  extraordinary  rapidity  with  which  groups  or  clus- 
ters of  small  stars  would  be  delineated,  saving  months  and 
years  of  labor. f  The  disturbance  of  the  atmosphere  does  not 
prove  so  serious  an  objection  in  stellar  photography  as  one 
would  at  first  suppose.  The  effect  is  more  or  less  eliminated 
by  a  long  exposure  of  from  three  to  five  minutes,  or  even 
longer.  The  stellar  impression  being  the  self-registered  mean 
effect  of  all  the  disturbances  of  the  image  during  exposure, 
(while  in  direct  vision  this  mean  effect  has  to  be  mentally  es- 
timated,) the  measurements  of  the  photographs  are  more  exact 
than  those  made  in  the  ordinary  way  under  the  same  atmos- 
pheric condition.  A  comparison  between  Professor  Bond's 
photographic  measurements  and  the  results  of  Struve's  obser- 
vations of  the  same  stars,  shows  the  photographic  method  to 
have  three  times  the  exactness  of  the  ordinary  method;  that 
is,  the  probable  error  of  a  single  photographic  observation  is 

*  American  Journal  of  Science,  vol  xxzix,  p.  300. 

\  Astrouoiuiiclio  Kacbrichtcn,  No.  1,129. 


1SG9.]      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  405 

no  greater  than  the  probable  error  of  the  mean  of  three  ob- 
servations made  in  the  usual  way.  The  aid  of  photography 
may  be  also  employed  in  determining  the  relative  magnitudes 
of  stars.  From  the  relative  diameters  of  the  star  images 
formed  under  similar  conditions  of  exposure,  a  Bcale  of  photo- 
graphic powers  could  be  derived  which  would  approximate  to 
the  scale  of  magnitudes  founded  on  then  comparative  bright- 
ness. 

The  path  of  astronomical  discovery  is  obstructed  more  by 
the  earth's  atmosphere  than  by  the  limitation  of  telescopic 
power.  The  highest  powers  of  our  largest  telescopes  can  only 
be  used  on  very  rare  occasions,  when  the  atmosphere  is  per- 
fectly tranquil.  It  may  be  possible  to  construct  a  telescope  of 
the  best  optical  qualities,  and  two  or  three  times  the  size 
hitherto  attained ;  but  to  avail  ourselves  of  its  great  magnify- 
ing power  we  sball  need  to  search  the  globe  for  those  favored 
spots  where  a  clear  and  tranquil  sky  will  afford  the  desired 
field  for  celestial  exploration.  As  such  instruments  and  op- 
portunities must,  from  the  nature  of  the  case,  be  rare,  the  ad- 
vantage of  a  rapid  and  accurate  mode  of  registration  in  order 
to  secure  a  greater  harvest  of  the  rich  fruits  thus  placed  within 
our  reach  is  obvious.  "Let  it  be  admitted  for  the  moment," 
says  Professor  Bond,  "to  be  possible  to  register  with  adequate 
perfection  an  exact  chart  of  each  considerable  star,  surrounded 
by  its  host  of  lesser  attendants,  what  more  admirable  means 
can  be  imagined  for  the  resolution  of  the  great  problems  of 
sidereal  astronomy  \  The  rare  occasions  when  an  atmosphere 
of  perfect  tranquillity  offers  itself  will  be  improved  to  the  ut- 
most, and  a  single  night  be  made  to  yield  the  results  of  months 
of  labor."  Another  advantage  of  the  photographic  method  is 
the  avoidance  of  error.-  arising  from  the  imperfection  of  the 
physical  organization.  The  method  of  recording  transits  by 
electro-magnetism  has  greatly  reduced  these  physiological 
errors,  but  not  entirely  eliminated  them,  as  was  at  first  hoped. 
"  The  possibility,"  says  M.  Faye,  "of  dispensing  with  the  ob- 
server (whose  'personal  equation'  varies  not  only  with  years, 
but  from  one  moment,  to  another,  with  the  troubles  of  diges- 
tion, circulation,  or  nervous  fatigue)  has  been  fully  demon- 
strated. The  met  hud  consists  in  substituting  fa-  the  eye  a 
photographic  plate,  and  in  automatically  registering  by  clee- 
Foueth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — 26 


406  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July, 

tricity  the  instant  when  the  light  is  admitted  to  the  dark 
chamber  attached  to  the  telescope."  *  By  this  means  M. 
Fave  obtained  in  twenty  seconds  ten  complete  observations  of 
the  sun.  Again,  while  the  observer,  in  looking  at  an  object. 
scrutinizes  closely  only  the  parts  which  specially  interest  him 
at  the  moment  of  observation,  and  nearly  always  permits  the 
rest  to  escape  bis  attention,  the  photograph,  on  the  contrary, 
permanently  registers  every  thing  alike. 

*A  recent  example  has  shown  that  it  is  not  always  safe  to 
rely  on  the  appearance  of  exactness  even  in  a  science  which 
boasts  of  its  perfection.  It  was  supposed  that  the  observa- 
tions of  the  last  transit  of  Tonus  across  the  solar  disk  in  1709 
gave  the  sun's  mean  distance  from  the  earth  very  correctly. 
But  it  is  well  ascertained  to-day  that  the  adopted  value  of  this 
distance,  which  is  the  astronomer's  measuring  rod  for  celestial 
spaces,  is  too  great  by  more  than  three  millions  of  miles. 
Transits  of  Venus  will  again  occur  in  IST-i  and  1SS2,  and  it 
is  proposed  to  employ  the  new  and  more  accurate  method  in 
observing  the  phenomenon,  though  not  designed  that  it  should 
supplant  observations  with  the  eye.f  The  great  interest  at- 
tached to  these  transits  arises  from  the  fact  that  they  famish 
the  most  approved  method  of  determining  the  solar  parallax, 
and  thereby  the  sun's  distance.  A  correction  to  the  value  of 
this  necessitates  alike  correction  in  all  numerical  quantities 
involving  the  sun's  distance  as  a  unit.  The  advantages  of  the 
photographic  method  of  observing  such  transits  are  peculiar. 
It  is  not  important,  as  it  is  with  eye  observations,  to  catcli 
exactly  the  phases  of  contact  of  Venus  with  the  sun's  limb, 
nor  is  it  essential  that  stations  should  be  selected  on  nearly 
opposite  sides  of  the  earth  from  which  to  take  the  observations. 
A  series  of  photographs  at  short  intervals  can  be  obtained 
during  the  progress  of  the  planet  across  the  sun,  thus  insuring 
greater  accuracy  by  increasing-  the  number  of  observations. 
The  exposure  being  instantaneous  the  exact  moment  of  each 
record  may  be  accurately  determined.  And  what  is  b\  no 
means  unimportant,  the  recording  plate,  sensitive  though  it  is. 
has  no  nerves  to  be  strained  in  the  anxiety  to  make  the  utinosl 
of  so  rare  and  important  an  event.     No  solicitude  prevents  the 

•  Compte  Rendu,  Sopt  12,  lSO-1. 

|Sce  Moutlily  Notices  R.  A.  S.,  Doc.  11,  18CS. 


1869.1      Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.  -107 

unerring  instrument  from  recording  the  event  of  a  century 
with  the  same  accuracy  that  it  records  an  every-day  occur- 
rence. 

It  is  well  known  that  "  the  eternal  and  incorruptible  heav- 
ens," as  they  were  termed  by  Aristotle,  are  undergoing  con- 
tinual and  marked  changes.  The  so-called  fixed  stars — the 
"  landmarks  of  the  universe  " — have  their  own  proper  motions 
not  accounted  for  by  that  of  the  solar  system.  Sirius — as  that 
wonderful  aid  to  physical  astronomy,  the  spectroscope,  reveals 
— is  shooting  through  space  at  the  rate  of  a  thousand  million 
miles  a  year.  The  star  known  as  Gl  Oygni  has  a  trans- 
verse motion  alone  of  one  thousand  four  hundred  and  fifty 
million  miles  a  year.  Many  stars,  more  distant  still,  may 
even  exceed  this  rate.  ^Cooper's  recent  catalogue  of  stars 
shows  that  no  fewer  than  sevent}r-seven  stars  previously  cata- 
logued are  now  missing.  This,  no  doubt,  is  to  be  ascribed  in 
part  to  the  errors  of  former  observations ;  but  it  is  certain  that 
to  some  extent  at  least  it  is  the  result  of  changes  actually  in 
progress  in  the  sidereal  system.  Of  temporary  stars,  about 
twenty  have  been  observed,  and  more  than  six  times  that 
number  are  known  to  be  variable.  It  appears  quite  certain 
also  that  some  of  the  nebulae  have  undergone  a  change  of  both 
form  and  brilliancy.  When  the  celestial  lamps  shall  by  their 
own  light  record  their  history  on  the  photographic  page,  our 
knowledge  of  these  mysterious  luminaries,  whose  fires  wax  and 
wane,  or  go  out  in  utter  darkness,  will  be  less  involved  in 
doubt, 

Ifecent  observations  indicate  with  considerable  probability  a 
change  in  the  appearance  of  Lrnn<\  one  of  the  small  craters  of 
the  moon.  Two  other  craters  near  the  western  limb  are  sus- 
pected of  having  undergone  a  change;  and  indeed,  if  Leer  and 
Madler'8  observations  of  them  are  worthy  of  confidence,  it  can 
hardly  be  questioned.  It  is  quite  probable,  therefore,  that  vol- 
canic action,  which  from  the  moon's  configuratioD  seems  to  have 
been  so  abundant  in  its  past  history,  has  not-  yet  entirely 
ceased.  Still  errors  of  observation  and  of  delineation  pre- 
clude the  possibility  of  forming  a  perfectly  satisfactory  con- 
clusion with  respect  to  such  variations  from  former  descrip- 
tions, or  from  the  inspection  of  drawings  made  by  hand  ;  but 
if  changes  are  still  in  progress  in  that  luminary,  or  if  any 


40S  Application  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July, 

shall  hereafter  occur,  photography,  it  is  thought,  affords  the 

readiest  mean?  of  detecting  them.  A  very  interesting  ques- 
tion will  be  solved  when  we  arc  able  positively  to  affirm 
beyond  all  doubt  that  a  change  in  the  lunar  surface  has  been 
observed. 

Much  that  seems  desirable  in  celestial  photography  is  not 
yet  attained;  but  when  we  consider  that  the  art  is  in  its  in- 
fancy, and  that  every  day  is  giving  origin  to  improvements, 
we  may  well  feel  confident  that  this  method  of  automatic  ob- 
servation will  render  yet  more  important  service  to  the  science 
of  astronomy.  There  has  yet  been  but  one  object-glass  con- 
structed with  photographic  focus.  Its  diameter  is  eleven  and 
a  quarter  inches.  Mr.  De  La  Tiue  is  having  a  similar  lens 
constructed  of  thirteen  inches  diameter,  soon  to  be  in  opera- 
tion, from  which,  in  the  hands  of  so"  skillful  a  director,  much 
is  expected.  Professor  Henry  Draper  has  very  nearly  com- 
pleted a  new  silvered  glass  reflector  of  twenty-eight  inches 
diameter,  (the  largest  of  the  kind  yet  constructed,  except  one 
by  Foucault.)  which  will  be  of  the  Cassegrain  form,  so  as  to 
permit  the  use  of  a  secondary  magnifier  to  enlarge  the  image 
before  it  is  received  on  the  sensitive  plate.  In  a  recent  com- 
munication he  says,  "  The  mirror  has  already  had  a  prelim- 
inary polish,  and  is  going  to  turn  out  grandly."  With  this 
instrument  the  original  negatives  will  be  taken  six  inches  in 
diameter,  with  provision  for  extending  them  to  nine  and  a 
half  inches  if  desirable.  Such  pictures  will,  of  course,  contain 
an  amount  of  detail  not  possible  in  those  taken  with  ordinary 
instruments,  which  vary  from  one  to  two  inches  in  diameter,  ac- 
cording to  the  size  of  the  telescope.  Professor  Draper  expects 
thus  to  obtain  photographs  of  larger  size  and  sustaining  higher 
magnifying  power  than  any  that  have  yet  been  produced. 
The  amount  of  advantageous  enlargement  will  not  be  limited 
by  the  appearance  of  the  silver  granulation,  but  will  depend 
wholly  on  the  sharpness  of  definition  obtained  in  the  original 
picture. 

There  is  now  being  erected  (if  not  already  completed)  at 
Melbourne,  in  Australia,  a  powerful  reflecting  telescope  four 
feet  in  diameter,  of  the  Cassegrain  form,  which  will  be  sup- 
plied with  the  necessary  apparatus  for  photography,  as  well  as 
fur  spectroscopic  investigation.     This  derives  its  importance 


1869.]      Amplication  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.         409 

chiefly  from  the  fact  that  the  work  will  he  prosecuted  in  the 
rich  fields  of  the  southern  hemisphere. 

An  important,  adjunct  to  photography  is-a  method,  devised 
a  few  years  ago,  of  making  a  photographic  impression  do  its 
own  engraving— prepare  a  plate  by  which,  untouched  by  the 
hand  of  the  engraver,  any  number  of  accurate  copies  can  be 
printed  with  an  ordinary  press.  Specimens  of  prints  produced 
by  this  method  of  automatic  engraving  are  given  in  the 
monthly  notices  of  the  It,  A.  S.,  vol.  xxii,  Ko.  7 ;  and  vol. 
xxv,  No.  5 ;  and  also  in  the  Cosmos,  vol.  xxi,  page  176. 

We  have  already  alluded  to  the  perturbations  of  the  atmos- 
phere as  being  a  serious  obstacle  to  astronomical  observations. 
It  was  suggested  by  Newton  that  the  serene  and  quiet  air 
which  is  so  often  found  on  the  tops  of  mountains  above  the 
grosser  clouds  would  very  much  favor  celestial  observations. 
Such  elevated  stations  would  seem  to  possess  peculiar  advan- 
tages for  the  application  of  photography,  since  the  atmosphere 
is  not  only  less  subject  to  disturbance,  hut  is  also  more  favora- 
ble to  the  chemical  action  of  light.  The  results  of  the  expe- 
dition to  Teneriffc  in  1S5C  prove  these  suppositions  correct. 
In  a  paper  presented  to  the  British  Association  in  1803  Pro- 
fessor Piazzi  Smith,  who  had  charge  of  the  expedition,  states 
that  the  chief  object  at  Teneriffe  was  to  ascertain  the  degree 
of  improvement  in  telescopic,  vision  at  a  high  elevation.  Ob- 
servations wore  taken  at  various  points,  reaching  an  altitude 
of  eleven  thousand  feet,  or  ;i  1  it  tic  more  than  two  miles.  At 
that  height  the  majority  of  clouds  were  found  to  be  far  below, 
the  air  dry,  and  in  a  very  steady  and  homogeneous  stale  A 
photograph  taken  near  the  sea  level  could  not  be  made  to 
show  the  detail  on  the  side  of  a  distant  hill  no  matter  how 
marked  the  detail  might  be  by  rocks  and  cliffs  illuminated  by 
strong  sunshine.  Even  the  application  of  a  microscope  brought 
out  no  other  feature  than  one  broad,  flint,  and  nearly  uniform 
tint.  But  on  applying  the  microscope  to  photographs  of  dis- 
tant hills,  taken  at  a  high  level,  an  abundance  of  minute  detail 
appeared.  Each  little  separate  bush  could  he.  distinguished, 
though  the  hill-side  was  four  and  a  half  mile.-  from  the  camera.* 
The  important  results  obtained  by  this  expedition  has  led  to 
the  establishment  by  the  Russian  government,  of  an  astro- 
0  Annual  of  Scientific  Discovery,  1864,  }>.  Jia. 


410  Application,  of  Photography  to  Astronomy.       [July, 

nomieal  observatory  at  an  elevated  station  on  Mount  Ararat, 
near  Till  is. 

As  in  the  telescope  the  light  decreases  inversely  as  the 
square  of  the  magnifying  power,  there  must  be-  a  limit  at 
which  the  minute  details  of  an  object  become  lost  for  want  of 
light.  The  question  has,  therefore,  very  naturally  arisen, 
whether  by  the  aid  of  photography  and  extraneous  light  this 
barrier  can  be  removed  ;'  whether  a  photographic  image,  by 
throwing  upon  it  a  beam  of  condensed  light,  can  permit  a 
higher  power  to  be  used  with  advantage  than  the  optical 
image  formed  by  the  telescope.  In  other  words,  Is  the  photo- 
graphic eye  more  sensitive  than  the  living  eye  \  or,  Can  a  pho- 
tographic recipient  be  found  that  will  register  impressions 
which  the  living  eye  does  not  detect,  but  which,  by  increased 
light,  or  by  developing  agents,  may  be  rendered  visible? 
Concerning  this  question  Mr.  AV.  B.  Grove  says,  "It  is  per- 
haps hardly  safe  to  answer  it  a  priori;  but  the  experiment  of 
reproducing  photographs  [by  which,  even  when  exposed  to  a 
more  intense  light,  we  find  that  the  photographic  details  are 
limited  to  the  intensity  of  the  first  impression]  would  seem  to 
show  that  more  than  the  initial  light  cannot  be  got,  and  that  we 
cannot  expect  to  increase  telescopic  power  by  photography."  * 

Want  of  light,  however,  will  be  no  obstacle  to  photographing 
the  sun  or  moon  on  a  scale  of  any  magnitude  desired.  The 
light  of  the  sun  is  so  much  in  excess  of  what  is  required  to 
obtain  a  collodion  picture  that  the  loss  of  light  consequent  on 
the  necessary  interposition  of  lenses  or  mirrors  for  enlarging 
the  image  can  constitute  no  objection.  "We  may  reasonably 
hope,  therefore,  that  photographs  of  these  objects  will  be  ob- 
tained on  a  very  much  larger  scale  than  any  yet  produced. 

*  Grove's  Correlation  of  Physical  Forces,  (Tollman's  Compilation,)  p.  11 1. 


1869.]        Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.  411 


Aet.  VI.—  THE   PROPHECY  OF  JACOB   RESPECTING 
THE  MESSIAH. 

Tbe  scepter  shall  not  depart  from  Judah,  nor  a  lawgiver  from  between  his  feet, 
until  Shiloh  come;  and  him  shall  the  nations  obey.  Gen.  xlix.  10. 

This  important  prophecy  of  the  dying  Jacob  stands  out  in 
bold  relief  in  the  history  of  the  patriarchal  age.  Only  two 
Messianic  predictions  had  preceded  it;  one  of  them  directed  to 
the  serpent, — "I  will  put  enmity  between  thee  and  the  woman, 
and  between  thy  seed  and  her  Seed  :  it  shall  bruise  thy  head, 
and  thou  shalt  bruise  his  heel" — language  so  obscure  that  the 
most  ancient  Targumist  *  could  find  in  it  no  allusion  to  the 
Messiah  :f  the  other  prediction,  in  the  form  of  a  blessing, 
pronounced  upon  Abraham — "  In  thy  Seed  shall  all  the 
nations  of  the  earth  be  blessed" — was  more  distinct,  but  simply 
indicated  the  salvation  of  the  world  through  the  offspring  of 
Isaac. 

Jacob  prefaces  his  predictions  with  the  exhortation  and 
declaration  to  his  sons:  ''Gather  yourselves  together  that  I 
may  tell  you  that  which  shall  befall  you  in  the  last  days." 
The  phrase  b^to^n  r^Tinaa,  ''Il  the  last  days,  is  a  prophetic 
formula  for  the  remote  future.:}; 

In  a  prophecy  thus  reaching  to  the  most  distant  events  in 
the  history  of  the  twelve  tribes  we  naturally  expect  some 
allusion  to  Him  who  was  to  make  the  name  of  Israel  for  ever 
illustrious,  and  to  hold  a  universal  sway  over  the  human  race. 
Accordingly,  the  exposition  that  would  exclude  any  reference 
to  the  Median  in  the  text  placed  at  the  head  of  this  article  has 
in  it,  d priori,  great  improbability.  It  is  true,  that  if  we  take 
the  Rationalistic  stand-point,  and  assume  that  all  prophecy 
which  is  not  an  ardent  hope  springing  fromthe  earnest  yearnings 
and  the  deeply  felt  wants  of  humanity  is  cither  history  written 
after  the  events,  or,  where  that  is  impossible,  the  conjecture  of 

*  Onkelos. 

|  The  Targum  of  Jerusalem,  however,  written  Beveral  centuries  after  Chrisf, 
refers  it  to  the  times  of  the  Mi  isiah. 
J  See  Isaiah  ii,  2  ;  Micah  iv,  1  ;  Numbers  xxir,  1 1 ;  Dan.  x,  14 


412  Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.        [July, 

shrewd  political  observers,  then  we  must  deny  all  reference  in  the 
text  to  any  events  that  lie  beyond  the  time  of  the  composition  of 
the  Book  of  Genesis,  which  the  most  skeptical  and  reckless 
criticism  can  scarcely  bring  down  to  the  Davidic  times. 

But  with  the  clear  conviction  of  the  supernatural  character 
of  the  Old  Testament  prophecy,  we  are  prepared  to  find  pre- 
dictions of  events  that  lie  beyond  the  horizon  of  the  prophet, 
and  so  to  refer  them  when  the  circumstances  under  which  they 
were  uttered  and  the  laws  of  language  require  such  a  reference. 

Respecting  the  import  of  the  single  words  of  the  prophecy 
under  discussion,  we  may  remark  that  tfi»,  shebet,  although 
originally  meaning  rod  or  staff,  is  properly  translated  scepter, 
and  has  that  force  in  various  parts  of  the  Old  Testament,  of 
which  the  following  are  examples:  "Out  of  Zebulun  they 
wield  the  scepter,"  {shebet,)  Judges  v,  14.  "  There  shall  come 
a  star  out  of  Jacob,  and  a  scepter  {shebet)  shall  rise  out  of 
Israel."  Num.  xxiv,  17.  "The  scepter  {shebet)  of  Egypt  shall 
depart."  Zech.  x,  12.  "  One  handling  the  scepter,"  {shebet.)  a 
king.  Amos  i,  5,  8.  Pgtib,  Mechoqeq,  translated  lawgiver,  a 
participle  poel  from  |?i?ri,  means  also  rider,  judge,  a  scepter, 
and  in  the  text  it  may  stand  in  apposition  with  shebet,  scepter, 
and  be  synonymous  with  it  in  accordance  with  -a  well-known 
usage  of  Hebrew  poetry. 

The  word  shiloli  is  written  "in  most  editions  and  manuscripts 
nVffi>,  with  the  yod,  (">,)  and  in  twenty-eight  Jewish  manu- 
scripts and  in  all  the  Samaritan  it  is  riid  without  the  yod,  and 
in  a  few  manuscripts  -'"^  and  i*ii?.  But  Gesenius  thinks  this 
is  of  no  importance,  since  sh'doh,  when  the  inane  of  a  town, 
has  also  this  threefold  orthography.  It  is  evident,  then,  that 
the  Hebrew  critics  and  copyists  regarded  shiloh  as  a  simple 
word;  for  had  they  deemed  it  compounded  of  o,  she,  (an  ab- 
breviation of  "i-'a,)  and  ~o,  lo,  making  i^u;,  shcllo,  they  would 
never  have  written  it  with  the  yod. 

To  this  objection  to  its  being  considered  a  compound  word 
must  be  added  the  fact  that  b,  the  abbreviated  form  of  ir», 
nowhere  occurs  in  the  Pentateuch,  and  is  first  met  with  in  the 
Book  of  Judges.  But  if,  in  spite  of  these  facts,  shiloh  be  re- 
garded as  a  compound  word,  which  is  the  opinion  of  i 
eminent  scholars,  then  its  meaning  is,  to  whom  if  is,  t>>  whom 
the  scepter  belongs,  which  is,  indeed,  very  abrupt,  and  is  more 


1SG9J        Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.  413 

fully  expressed  by  Ezekiel :  ';  I  Avill  overturn,  overturn,  overturn 
it:  find- it  shall  be  no  more  until  He  come  -whose  right  it  is,  (or 
to  whom  judgment  belongs.)  and  I  will  give  it  him."  Chap,  xxi, 
2.7.  Ir.  is  very  probable  that  the  prophet  had  in  his  mind  this 
very  text,  and  he  evidently  refers  it  to  the  Messiah. 

Taking  "shiloh"  as  a  simple  word,  what  is  its  import?  It 
means  pace,  tranquillity.  Nor  is  this  doubtful,  for  we  have 
cognate  forms  of  similar  force:  shalah,  to  be  secure,  tranquil,  at 
rest,  (Gesenius;)  to  be  tranquil,  at  peace,  secure,  (Fuerst.) 
Shalvah,  tranquiUity,  security,  (Gesenius;)  peace,  rest,  (Fuerst.) 
In  Syriac  we  have  shelyo,  rest;  shalyo,  at  rest,  peaceful; 
shalyutho.  rest,  peace.  Arabic,  salah,  to  he  serene,  tranquil. 
Shiloh  seems  to  be  an  abbreviation  of  shilon,*  from  which  by 
Hebrew  usage  we  have  shiloni,  shilonite;  just  as  the  word 
ri»5o,  Shelomo,  Solomon,  is  an  abbreviation  of  paj?,  Shclomon. 
The  name  Solomon  is  derived  from  t:i;"i,  shalom,  peace.  In 
shiloh  (from  shalah)  we  have  the  idea  of  internal  quiet  and 
peace ;  in  shalom,  wholeness,  soundness,  safety,  then  peace  in 
opposition  to  war.  Both  of  these  ideas  can  be  well  applied  to 
the  Messiah. 

This  name,  Shiloh,  Peace,  stands  for  the  Messiah,  who  in  Isaiah 
ix,  5,  is  called  DiJra  v~,  Prince  of  Peace,  which  title  Gesenins, 
Rcediger,  and  Fuerst  themselves  refer  to  the  Messiah.  It  was 
altogether  appropriate  that  the  Messiah  should  be  predicted 
under  the  title  Shiloh,  because  in  him  dwells  fullness  of  peace, 
its  very  intensity;  and  we  can  illustrate  this  by  a  clear 
analogy.  The  ruler  of  the  Turkish  Empire  is  called  Sultan,-\ 
an  Arabic  word — the  same  as  the  Chaldee  ysbv, — meaning 
power,  dominion;  he  bears  this  title  because  he  is  regarded 
as  the  very  embodiment  of  power  and  dominion,  the  shadow 
of  God  upon  the  earth.  This  use  of  abstract^  for  concrete 
ideas  was  more  common  in  the  ancient  than  it  is  in  the  modern 
world.     The  classical   scholar  will   recall  to  his  mind   many 

*We  find  that  the  Septuagint  in  most  cases  gives  ZnX6fi  for  Shiloh.      The 
pic-sent  name  of  the  ancient  Bite  ofSbiloh  is  Seilim. — .'. 
in  Palestine,  vol.  ii,  269.    Josephus  writes  it  Siloun. 

f  The  first  Turkish  ruler  to  whom  the  title  Sultan  was  given  waa  Mahmudof 
Ga/.ua,  a  thousand  years  after  Christ — Gibbon's  Decline  and  Full  </  th   h 
Empire,  vol  v,  p.  500. 

\  It  is  not  absolutely  necessary  to  tako  Shiloh  abstract  fur  concrete;  it  may  bo 
an  appellative,  the  possessor  of  peace. 


414  Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.        tJuly, 

instances  in  the  ancient  writers.  And  what  a  beautiful  com- 
mentary upon  Sliiloh  was  the  announcement  of  the  angels  at 
the  birth  of  Christ :  "  Behold,  I  bring  you  good  tidings  of  great 
joy,  which  shall  be  to  all  people."  "Glory  to  God  in  the 
highest,  and  on  earth  peace,  good-will  toward  men."  Christ 
is  the  great  restorer  of  peace  between  God  and  man,  and 
between  man  and  his  fellow.  Christianity,  in  teaching  the 
common  brotherhood  oi  the  human  race,  has  done  more  than 
any  tiling  else  to  break  down  caste  and  promote  peace  and  love 
among  men.  St.  Paul,  in  Ephesians,  speaks  of  Christ  as  "  our 
peace,"  in  the  sense  of  peace-maker,  which  is  perfectly  in  har- 
mony with  the  title  Sliiloh. 

That  the  name  Sliiloh  refers  to  the  Messiah  was,  it  seems, 
the  universal  opinion  until  several  centuries  after  Christ, .  The 
exposition  that  denies  in  the  name  any  reference  to  the  Messiah 
was  the  invention  of  hostile,  prejudiced  Jews,  in  which  they 
have  been  followed  by  some  eminent  Rationalistic  scholars,  but 
scarcely  by  any  one  else. 

In  giving  the  views  that  have  been  taken  of  this  prophecy  of 
Jacob,  we  shall  begin  with  the  Septuagint :  "A  ruler  shall 
not  fail  from  Judah,  and  a  leader  from  his  loins,  until  lie  come 
for  whom  these  things  are  reserved,  and  he  himself  is  the  ex- 
pectation of  the  nations."*  "The  scepter  shall  not  depart 
from  Judah,  and  a  lawyer  from  between  his  feet,  until  He  come 
whose  it  is,  and  i'or  him  shall  the  nations  await." — Peshito 
Syrieic.\  "The  scepter  shall  not  depart  from  Judah,  and  a 
leader  from  his  thigh,  until  He  come  who  is  to  lie  sent,  and  he 
shall  be  the  expectation  of  the  nations." — Vulgate  Edition  of 
Sixtus  V.and  Clement  VIII. 

The  Samaritan  Pentateuch  contains  the  text  under  discus- 
sion in  nearly  the  same  form  as  it  stands  in  the  Hebrew,  and 
there  is  the  best  authority  for  saying  that  the  Samaritans  them- 
selves explain  it  of  a  Messiah. 

Of  all  the  ancient  versions  of  the  Pentateuch  that  of  Onkelos,J 
made  in  Chaldee,  is  the  most  valuable,  and  it  has  always  stood 

*Ovk  ixtetyet  up_,vuv  t£  lovJo  h.m  7)yovfirvog  ix  r£>v  ptipuv  aiirov  Jc>c  lav  k?.dy 
~u  H~oKvijaia  avru,  ual  abrbs  irpooioicia  tJvu;'. —  Van  Ess's  Edition.  The  Penta- 
teuch was  translated  2so  13.  C. 

]  Edition  of  Prof.  Lee,  London,  1S23.  This  version  was  made-  in  the  first  or 
second  century. 

\  Onkelos  probably  lived  a  short  time  before  Christ. 


1809 J     '    JacoVs  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah .  415 

very  high  with  the  Jews.     His  translation  of  our  passage  is  as 

satisfactory  as  could  be  desired  :  "  A  ruler  shall  not  depart  from 
the  house  of  Judah,  and  a  prophet  (saphra,  prophet,  lawyer, 

scribe)  from  among  his  children's  children  for  ever,  until  the 
Messiah  come  whose  the  kingdom  is,  and  him  shall  the  nations 
obey."*  "Kings  shall  not  fail  from  the  house  of  Judah.  n  ir 
skillful  teachers  of  the  law  from  among  his  children's  children. 
until  the  time  when  King  Messiah  comes,  whose  the  kingdom 
is,  and  him  shall  all  the  kingdoms  of  the  earth  serve." — Targum 
of  Jerusalem.  "  Until  Shiloh  come,  King  Messiah,  whose  the 
kingdom  is,  and  so  Onkelos  and  Midrash  [a  Jewish  Commentary] 
explain  Shiloh." — Rashi.\  "The  great  scepter  shall  not  de- 
part from  Judah  until  David  come,  who  was  the  first  king  of 
Judah,  and  so  it  was  as  is  shown  from  the  fact  that  Judah  [in 
the  wilderness]  marched  in  the  front  rank;  also  Jehovah  (the 
name)  said,  Judah  shall  go  up  first." — Mm  Ezra.%  He  also 
remarks :  "  There  are  some  who  explain  this  of  the  city  Shiloh, 
until  an  end  come  to  Shiloh,  [Shiloh  nominative  to  the  verb 
ttt^,  come,  to  go  down,  like  the  sun,]  for  thus  it  is  written  :  And 
he  rejected  the  tabernacle  of  Shiloh,  and  afterward  he  chose 
David  his  servant/'  Here  we  have  the  germ  of  an  exposition 
that  has  become  very  popular  among  the  Jews  and  with  some 
of  the  Rationalists — the  referring  of  Shiloh  to  a  city  of  that 
name,  thus  freeing  themselves  from  the  necessity  of  applying 
the  passage  to  the  Messiah. 

Fuerst,  in  his  great  Concordance  of  the  Hebrew  Bible,  (pub- 
lished at  Leipsic  in  1840,)  defines  Shiloh:  Best^ peace,  a  title, 
as  the  most  ancient  tradition  proves,  of  the  Messiah,  who  brings 
peace  and  rest?''  He  then  confirms  this  statement  by  referring 
to  ancient  authorities,  and  concludes  by  remarking:  ''Some 
affirm  that  Shiloh  is  for  Shilyah,  and  that  il  is  spoken  of  the 
son  (of  Judah,)  absurd!)',  certainly;  others,  among  whom  are 
also  Jewish  interpreters,  through  prejudice,  understand  it  of 
the  town  Shiloh."  § 

*  This  passage  ami  the  three  following  wo  havo  translated  from  the  Ghaldee  and 
Rabbinical  in  Buxtorfs  great  Rabbinical  Bible. 

f  A  Jewish  c  mimentalor. 

\  A  celebrated  Spanish  Rabbi  of  the  twolfth  century. 

§  Quies,  pax,  cognomen,   uti  vetustissima   traditio  confirmat,   M 
quitemque  afferentis.    Alii  pro  n"v53  de  Olio  dictum  rolunt,  ubsurde  scilie  t;  ;.'.!:, 
inhisetiara  Judaici  interpretes,  Siluntem  oppidura  praco  lligunt 


4-16  Ja-coVs  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.    '    [July, 

But  let  us  hear  Fucrst  in  1863.  After  giving  the  view?  of 
others  upon  the  word,  he  says,  "  But  it  is  better  to  abide  by  the 
first  signification  of  f'~-~'4  as  the  name  of  a  place,  and  take  the 
verse  to  mean  that  Judah  took  the  precedence  of  all  the  other 
tribes  at  the  beginning  in  leading  warlike  marches  till  the  ark 
came  to  Shiloh  in  Ephraim,  and  the  obedience  of  the  Canaanite 
peoples  was  effected ;  after  which  the  old  leadership  ceased."  * 
This  is  certainly  a  remarkable  falling  off  in  the  exposition  of  a 
sublime  prophecy,  and  shows  great  progress  in  the  Rationalistic 
direction. 

Gresenius,  in  the  last  edition  of  his  Hebrew  Lexicon,  has, 
under  the  word  Shilok,  the  following:  ilJ2esti  tranquillity; 
such  seems  to  be  the  meaning  of  the  word  in  the  difficult 
passage,  the  scepter  shall  not  depart  from  Judah  until  rest  shedl 
come,  and  the  nations  obey  him,  (Judah.)  That  is,  Judah  shall 
not  lay  aside  the  scepter  of  a  leader  until  he  shall  have  subdued 
his  enemies,  and  obtained  dominion  over  many  nations;  refer- 
ring to  the  expected  kingdom  of  the  Messiah,  who  was  to  spring 
frorn  the  tribe  of  Judah."  This  is  from  Dr.  Robinson's  edit  ion 
at  the  close  of  1843.  about  a  year  after  the  death  of  Gesenius. 
In  Robinson's  eighth  stereotyped  edition  of  Gesenins's  Lexi- 
con we  have  the  following  from  Rcediger,  who  made  additions 
to  the  last  part  of  Gesenius:  "The  scepter  shall  not  depart 
from  Judah  until  he  (Judah)  come  to  Shiloh,  and  the  nations 
obey  him.  Here  Shiloh  is  accusative  of  place,  as  in  rijjiffl  &b*?, 
and  he  came  to  Shiloh,  1  Sam.  iv,  12  ;  1  Kings  xiv,  4.  Com]). 
Judges  xxiv,  12;  1  Sam.  iv,  4.  It  was  in  the  patriarch's  mind 
that  the  tribe  of  Judah  would  be  the  leader  of  the  other  tribes  in 
the  war  against  the  Canaanites,  and  thus  hold  the  supreme  power. 
See  Judges  i,  1,  seq.  Comp.  xx,  IS  ;  Num.  ii,  1,  seq.  x,  14  :  nor 
could  this  war  be  regarded  as  finished  and  victory  obtained 
until  the  Hebrews  came  as  conquerors  to  Shiloh,  in  the  middle 
of  the  land,  and  there  set  up  the  sacred  ark  and  tabernacle; 
after  which  the  Canaanites,  being  now  subdued,  Judah  ceased 
to  be  leader,  and  the  laud  v  as  distributed  in  peace  among 
the  tribes.  See  especially  Josh,  xviii,  1.  This  interpretation 
Mas  proposed  by  Teller,  and  has  been  followed  by  Herder, 
Bleek,  Tuch,  Ewald,  Delitsch,  and  others.     In  the  name  n>= 

*  Hebrew  and  ChaMeo  Lex.,  translated  by  Dr.  Davidson.  New  York:  1.  y- 
poMi,  K  Holt.     1SC7. 


1SG9J       JacoVs  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.  417 

the  author  probably  had  respect  to  the  signification,  red,  peace  ; 
and  the  prophecy  may  have  looked  forward  beyond  that  epoch 
of  lime."  He  also  remarks:  "Ubt  a  few  modern  interpreters 
take  rfrwd  here  as  an  appellative,  signifying  either  peace,  quiet, 
or  (abstract  for  theconcrete)  pacificator,  prince  of  peace.  Most 
understand  by  it  the  Messiah.  But  this  view  labors  under  the 
difficulty  that  no  such  appellative  noun  is  elsewhere  found,  nor 
one  of  a  like  form,  except  fo~>,  which  is  the  name  of  a  place, 
as  is  fftiOj  every-where  else."  Here  we  have  the  anti-Messianic 
view  exhibited  in  its  most  plausible  form  by  a  very  distinguished 
scholar  and  critic. 

But  what  shall  we  say  of  Ecedigers  assertion  that  "no  such  ap- 
pellative noun  is  elsewhere  found,  nor  one  of  a  like  form  ? "  Is  not 
the  word  ri&lHp,  Shelomoh,  Solomon,  like  rij>"»»,  Shiloh,  in  form,' 
and  is  it  not  an  appellative,  and  given  to  Solomon  because  he 
was  a  man  qfpeacef*  We  lind  in  the  Old  Testament  more 
than  forty  proper  nouns,  the  names  of  places,  about  thirty  of 
persons,  and  many  common  nouns  and  adjectives,  with  the 
termination  "f- on.  We-  lind  some  words  ending  in  \i>on,  that 
are  the  names  of  both  cities  and  men  ;  for  example,  y~;~.  "f^xf. 
Why,  then,  ma}T  not  Shiloh  (Shilon)  be  both  the  name  of  an 
individual  and  of  a  city  ?  or,  according  to  the  usage  of  the 
language,  be  both  a  common  and  a  proper  noun  ?  Shiloh  (from 
shalah)  could  be  an  adjective  or  a  noun.  As  applied  to  a  per- 
son, it  would  mean  peaceful,  peace,  or  a  peace-maker.  When 
applied  to  a  city,  a  place  of  peace  or  rest. 

It  seems  very  probable  that  the  town  Shiloh  had  no  cx;-t- 
ence  before  the  children  of  Israel,  under  Joshua,  pitched  the 
tabernacle  there,  and  the  ark  rested  alter  its  long  wanderings, 
and  that  from  this  very  circumstance  the  place  derived  its 
name,  when  the  "  land  was  subdued  before  them."  See  Joshua 
xviii,  1.  We  have  in  Joshua  iv,  10,  a  similar  case.  It  i 
they  "encamped  in  Gilgal,"  but  the  place  was  not  then  so 
called,  but  acquired  the  name  afterward  from  the  reproach  of 
the  Israelites  having  been  rolled  away  by  their  circumcision. 
Chap,  v,  0. 

Even  if  the  town  Shiloh  existed  in  the  patriarchal  tin 

*  That  Shiloh  is  generally  written  with  tho  yod  (-0  makes  no  difl 
comparison.     Similar  in  formation  arc    *Vb*p,   *f~~*r-       w~?,    ■ 
Gcs<.-riiu.s,  is  for  V1"?. — Pharoix. 


41$  Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.         [July, 

must  have  been  a  place  of  little  note.  In  the  Book  of  Joshua 
we  have  an  account  of  the  capture  of  many  cities  and  kings, 
but  not  a  word  about  the  capture  of  Shiloh ;  the  Israelites  sim- 
ply come  thither  and  pitch  the  tabernacle.  In  describing  the 
borders  of  the  hind  allotted  to  each  tribe  the  old  names  are 
almost  invariably  given,  and  in  the  description  of  the  limits  of 
Ephraim  it  is  said,  "and  the  border  went  about  eastward  unto 
Taanath-Shiloh."  Taanath-Shiloh,  according  to  Gesenius,  means 
"Approach  of  Shiloh  ;"  according  to  Fuerst,  "  Circle  of  Shiloh;' 
That  this  is  the  same  Shiloh  in  which  the  tabernacle;  was 
pitched,  is  evident  from  the  locality.  It  is  not  named  Shiloh, 
but  the  Circuit  or  Region  of  Shiloh,  for  the  land,  not  the  city, 
was  there  when  Joshua  entered  the  country. 

That  Shiloh  owed  all  its  importance  to  the  presence  of  the 
tabernacle  and  the  ark  is  clear  from  the  fact  that  after  the 
capture  of  the  ark  in  the  time  of  Eli  the  place  was  almost  en- 
tirely abandoned.  It  is  spoken  of  by  Jeremiah  in  the  follow- 
ing terms:  "But  go  ye  now  unto  my  place  which  was  in 
Shiloh,  where  I  set  my  name  at  the  first.,  and  see  what  I  did  to 
it  fur  the  wickedness  of  my  people  Israel."  Chap,  vii,  12.  In 
the  time  of  Jeroboam  the  prophet  Ahijah  is  spoken  of  in  sev- 
eral passages  -  as  dwelling  in  Shiloh.  How  Fuerst  (Heb.  and 
Chal.  Lexicon)  could  say  that  Shiloh  was  then  an  "important 
city,"  and  refer  to  these  pa-sages  simply  as  the  proof,  is  hard 
to  say. 

How  unnatural  it  would  be  for  Jacob  to  speak  of  coming  to 
a  Shiloh  that  then  had  no  existence — a  most  minute  prophecy 
respecting  an  unimportant  event — and  to  pass  by  m  utter  silence 
matters  of  the  deepest  import.  To  suppose  that  genuine  proph- 
ecy would  overlook  the  greatness  and  renown  of  Jndah  with 
his  long  line  of  kings,  and  the  glory  of  the  kingdom  of  the 
Messiah  who  was  to  spring  from  Judab,  and  that  it  would 
limit  itself  to  the  insignificant  honors  of  the  tribe  before  coming 
to  Shiloh,  is  absurd  in  a  very  high  degree.  "The  testimony 
of  Jesus  is  the  spirit  of  prophecy.''  But  it  is  very  evident  that 
those  who  explain  the  prophecy  of  the  coming  to  Shiloh  have 
no  abiding  conviction  of  the  genuineness  of  the  prophecy, f  but 

*  1  Kings  \i.  29;  xii,  15 j  xiv,  2,  -I. 

t  From  this  remark  we  should  except  the  Jews,  who  have  a  dogmatic  interest 
in  not  referring  it  to  the  M( 


1S69.]         Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.  419 

rather  regard  it  as  language  put  into  the  mouth  of  Jacob  when 
the  event  justified  the  prophecy.  But  there  is  nothing  in  the 
prediction  to  chow  that  it  is  merely  history  thrown  into  the 
prophetic  form.  When,  then,  was  the  Book  of  Genesis  written, 
or  when  was  this  prophecy  invented?  when  Judah  came  to 
ShilohJ  But  the  war  with  the  Canaanites  was  not  yet  ended. 
and  if  Judah  had  been  the  leading  tribe  up  to  that  time,  what 
ground  could  the  inventor  have  to  think  that  Judah's  leader- 
ship would  then  cease,  when  in  fact  it  did  not,  but  rather  began 
after  that  event?  Nor  could  the  prophecy  have  been  invented 
during  the  period  of  the  Judges,  of  .David,  or  of  any  subse- 
quent king. 

"What,  then,  was  the  leadership  of  Judah  previous  to  his 
coming  to  Shiloh  ?  The  prophecy  announces  that  the  scepter 
shall  not  depart  from  Judah.  A  scepter  is  wielded  by  a  king ; 
Judah  then  had  no  king.  It  was  Moses,  who,  under  God,  held 
absolute  power  over  the  twelve  tribes  for  forty  years,  from  the 
coming  out  of  Egypt  until  their  approach  to  the  promised  land. 
But  Moses  belonged  to  the  tribe  of  Levi.  Joshua  was  the 
leader  until  they  came  to  Shiloh,  and  he  was  of  the  tribe  of 
Ephraim.  It  is  perfectly  clear,  then,  that  Levi  and  Ephraim 
were  the  leading  tribes;  just  as  among  the  ancient  Greeks 
that  tribe  from  which  the  president  of  the  senate  was  selected, 
was  called  the  presiding  tribe.  All  the  pre-eminence  that 
Judah  had  in  the  wilderness  was  the  privilege  of  marching  in 
the  front  rank  in  the  wilderness,*  and  it  is  very  likely  that  this 
was  conceded  to  him  because  his  tribe  was  the  most  numerous. 
.Dan  stood  next  in  numbers;  lie  was  posted  as  a  strong  guard 
in  the  rear.  In  the  numerous  battles  recorded  in  Joshua  />/■,.- 
vious  to  the  coming  to  Shiloh,  not  a  word  is  said  oibout  JudaKs 
taking  the  lead. 

After  the  death  of  Joshua  the  children  of  Israel  inquire  of 
the  Lord,  "Who  shall  go  up  for  us  against  the  Canaanites,  first 
to  fight  against  them."t  The  answer  is,  "Judah  shall  go." 
But  if  Judah  had  been  accustomed  to  take  the  lead,  what  need 
was  there  to  inquire  of  the  Lord  concerning  the  matter? 
About  twenty  years  after  this  they  ask  counsel  of  the  Lord 
again,  "Which  of  us  shall  go  up  first  to  the  battle  against  the 
children  of  Benjamin P    The  answer  is,  "Judah  shall  go  up 

*  Num.  x,  M,  seq.  f  Ju<!,;r:>  i,  ],  2. 


420  Jacob's  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.         [July, 

first."*  All  this  was  after  the  coming  to  Shiloh,  and  it  shows 
that  even  then  there  was  no  absolute  leadership  in  the  tribe  of 
Judah. 

Furthermore,  the  second  member  of  the  prophetic  sentence 
is  wholly  incongruous  with  the  explanation  "until  he  come  to 
Shiloh."  If  we  understand  pfen'jp,  Mechoqeq,  (translated  law- 
giver,) as  defining  more  exactly  sheftet,  (scepter,)  and  translate  it 
miler,  what  ruler  had  Judah  before  lie  came  to  Shiloh  ?  If  the 
word  means  lawgiver  or  prophet,  he  had  none.  If  we  under- 
stand by  it  a  lawyer  or  scribe,  it  is  altogether  inappropriate, 
for  when  the  tribe  came  to  Shiloh  the  law  had  been  given  but 
comparatively  a  few  years,  and  these  teachers  were  to  continue 
for  many  centuries  afterward.  Besides  all  this,  it  is  very 
strange  that  the  Jews  should  have  so  palpably  misunderstood 
their  own  language  for  so  many  centuries  in  referring  the  pas- 
sage to  the  Messiah,  never  dreaming  of  this  coming  to  Shiloh. 
Nor  are  Fuerst  and  Hcediger  happy  in  explaining  "him  shall 
the  nations  obey,"  of  obedience  rendered  to  Judah  by  the 
Canaanites.  For — to  say  nothing  of  the  unauthorized  limita- 
tion of  the  expression  "nations"  to  the  Canaanites — were  they 
not  destroyed  rather  than  held  in  obedience  to  Judah  ?  There 
would  be  some  force  in  the  exposition  if  the  prophecy  read,  "By 
him  shall  the  nations  be  cut  off!"  The  word  nr.p^,  construct 
nrjS??,  (English  version,  gathering,)  is  found  in  one  other  passage- 
only,  Prov.  xxx,  17,  where  it  is  rendered  to  obey  '  it  properly 
means  obedience,  reverence,  respect.  The  corresponding  Arabic- 
word  wahiha  has  the  same  force,  to  obey. 

It  may  be  a  question  whether  the  obedience  of  the  nations 
is  to  be  rendered  to  Judah  or  to  Shiloh;  him,  ill  the  passage, 
can  refer  to  Judah,  but  the  reference  to  Shiloh  is  mere  natural, 
and  on  the  hypothesis  that  the  Messiah  is  here  spoken  of,  is 
necessarily  required.  Nor  is  there  any  difficulty  respecting 
gender,  for  Shiloh  is  masculine,  and  if  it  were  not,  the  sense 
would  demand  a  masculine  pronoun. 

But  it  may  be  asked,  had  not  the  scepter  already  departed 
from  Judah  when  the  Messiah  came?  There  was. a  captivity 
of  seventy  years  in  Babylon,  during  which  the  BCepter  was  in 
abeyance.  When  Judah  returned  from  captivity,  Zerubbabel, 
of  that  tribe,  became  governor;  after  him  the  government  was 
*  Judges  xx,  18. 


1869J        JacoVs  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.  421 

administered  by  high  priest?,  (Nchemiah  may  Lean  exception.) 
until  the  posterity  of  the  Asmonseans  set  up  kingly  govern- 
ment. The  Asmonasan  family  reigned  for  one  hundred  and 
twenty-six  years.  This  Asmonsean  or  Maccabean  family  was 
destroyed  by  Herod  the  Great  about  thirty-seven  years  before 
the  birth  of  Christ.  He  was  the  son  of  an  Idumean,  and  ap- 
pointed king  of  the  Jews  by" the  Romans,  which  position  he- 
held  until  a  short  time  after  the  birth  of  Christ.  The  Jews, 
however,  had  already  been  made  tributary  to  the  Romans  by 
Pompey,  about  sixty-three  years  before  Christ.  About  thirty- 
seven  years  after  the  crucifixion  of  our  Lord  Jerusalem  was 
destroyed  by  the  Roman  army  under  Titus,  and  the  Jewish 
people  scattered  to  the  four  winds  of  heaven. 

But  this  government  of  Judah,  administered  by  Levites  until 
the  accession  of  Herod,  was  by  no  means  a  foreign  one,  for 
these  Levites  were  blended  and  reckoned  with  Judah.  Judah 
possessed  the  scepter,  the  royal  prerogatives,  in  the  same  de- 
gree as  if  its  rulers  had  been  of  its  own  tribe:  just  as  our 
States  are  in  their  sphere  sovereign  and  independent,  though 
their  governors  may  be  Irishmen  or  Germans.  Accordingly, 
the  substantial  truth  of  the  prophecy  remains  unshaken,  after 
all  proper  abatements  are  made  and  limitations  set.  But  it 
must  be  observed  that  in  a  short,  pithy,  prophetic  declaration, 
we  arc  not  to  expect  all  the  precision  of  a  geometrical  definition, 
or  of  an  algebraical  equation.  Hengstenberg,  in  his  Christol- 
ogw  of  the  Old  Testament,  contends  that  the  scepter  m  ver  has 
left  Judah,  since  Christ,  who  now  holds  the  scepter,  sprang  from 
that  tribe;  and  that  until  does  not  express  an  absolute  limit, 
any  more  than  when  we  say  to  our  friends  upon  parting,  "  Fare- 
well until  we  meet  again  ;"  for  this  does  not  imply  no  concern 
about  their  welfare  after  the  future  meeting.  And  this  appears 
to  be  the  right  view.  Jacob  would  seem  to  say,  "  The  scepter 
shall  not  leave  Judah  until  Messiah  come;  beyond  that  I  haw 
no  concern.  For  if  once  the  Messiah  lays  hold  upon  the  sc< 
no  power  in  the  universe  can  wrest  it  from  his  hands."  Here  we 
cannot  but  advert  to  that  remarkable  providence  that  preserved 
the  tribe  of  Judah  until  the  advent  of  Christ.  Between  tin- 
powerful  kingdoms  of  Egypt,  Damascus,  Syria,  and  Babylon, 
it  might  have  been  ground  to  powder.  The  ten  tribes,  more 
than  seven  hundred  years  before  Christ,  had  been  tarried  away 

Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — 27 


422  JacoVs  Prophecy  respecting  the  Messiah.         [Jul)'; 

captive  beyond  the  Euphrates  by  Shalmaneser,  to  return  no 
more.  Judah,  to  which  Benjamin  was  reckoned,  alone  re- 
mained, as  the  stock  from  which  should  spring  "The  Branch," 
under  which  the  various  nations  of  the  earth  should  find  peace 
aud  safety. 

In  conclusion,  this  prophecy,  in  its  fulfillment,  has  become 
matter  of  history.  The  kingdom  of  Christ  in  three  centuries 
broke  to  pieces  the  Roman  Empire  of  Paganism,  and  dethroned 
Jupiter  himself.  The  most  cultivated  and  powerful  nations  of 
the.  earth  recognize  the  divine  mission  of  Christ.  Millions  of 
hearts  now  render  homage  to  him.  His  mfluence  shall  go  on 
increasing  until  all  the  nations  of  the  earth  shall  bow  to  his 
"scepter." 


Art.  VII.— BIBLICAL  MONOGRAPHS. 

SAUL  AKD  PAUL. 

The  change  of  name  in  the  great  Apostle  of  the  Gentiles  has 
given  rise  to  various  interpretations.  The  precise  meaning 
of  Paul.  The  motive  for  adopting  it  in  the  place  of  Saul  is 
still  a  subject  of  dispute. 

The  original  name  of  the  Apostle  was  Saul,  the  most  distin- 
guished name  in  the  genealogy  of  the  tribe  of  Benjamin,  to 
which  he  belonged,  (Rom.  xi,  1 ;  Phil,  iii,  5.  Compare  Acts 
xiii,  12.)  He  used  it  among  the  Jews,  at  least  before  he  en- 
tered upon  his  independent  apostolic  labors  among  the  Gen- 
tiles. But  in  the  latter  part  of  the  Acts  and  in  his  Epistles 
the  name  of  Paul  uniformly  occurs.  He  chose  it,  in  all  proba- 
bility, as  the  nearest  allusive  and  alliterative  Hellenistic  and 
Latin  equivalent  for  Saul,  and  because  it  was  already  familiar 
to  the  Greeks  and  Romans  ;  while  Saul,  as  a  proper  name,  was 
unknown  to  them. 

It  was  customary  among  the  Jews  and  early  Christians  to 
use  two  names,  cither  similar  in  sound  and  identical  in  mean- 
ing, as  Silas  and  Silvanus,  Lncas  aud  Lucanus;  or  similar  in 
sound  but  different  in  meaning,  as  Jesus  aud  Justus,  (Col.  iv, 
11,)  Saul  and  Paul,  Hillel  and  Pollio;  or  different  in  sound 
but  identical  in  meaning,  as  Cephas  (Hebrew)  and  Peter, 
(Greek;)  or  different  both  in  sound  and  meaning,  as  Jacob  and 
Israel,  Simon  and  Peter,  Bartholomew  and  Xathanael,  John 


18C9.]  Biblical  Monographs.  423 

and  Mark,  (Acts  xii,  12,  25,)  Simeon  and  Niger,  (xiii,  1,)  Bar- 
sabas  and  Justus,  (i,  23.) 

It  is  possible  that  the  Apostle  Paul  as  a  Roman  citizen 
received  this  name  in  early  youth  in  Tarsus,  or  inherited  it 
from  some  ancestor,  who  may  have  adopted  it  in  becoming  a 
freedman  or  in  acquiring  the  Roman  citizenship,  Pan!  being 
the  well-known  cognomen  of  several  distinguished  Roman  fam- 
ilies, as  the  gens  JEmilia,  Fabia,  Julia,  Sergia,  etc. 

It  is  more  probable,  however,  that  he  chose  the  name  him- 
self, after  he  entered  upon  his  labors  among  the  Gentiles,  as  a 
part  of  his  missionary  policy  to  become  a  Greek  to  the  Greeks, 
in  order  to  gain  them  more  readily  to  Christ.  (1  Cor.  ix,  19-23.) 

At  all  events,  the  name  Paul  is  first  mentioned  during  his 
first  great  missionary  journey,  when  he,  taking  henceforth 
precedence  of  Barnabas  in  words  and  in  acts,  struck  Elymas, 
the  sorcerer,  with  blindness,  and  converted  Sergius  Paulus, 
the  Proconsul  of  Cyprus,  to  the  Christian  faith.  Acts  xiii,  8. 
After  this  striking  fact  he  is  uniformly  called  Paul  in  the  lat- 
ter chapters  of  the  Acts  and  in  all  the  Epistles. 

But  we  have  no  right  for  this  reason  to  infer  (with  Jerome, 
Olshausen,  Meyer,  Ewald,  and  others)  that  the  name  Paul 
was  a  memorial  of  the  conversion  of  Sergius  Paulus,  as  his 
first  fruit.  For,  1.  He  may  have  converted  many  Jews  and 
Gentiles  before  that  time ;  2.  Pupils  are  called  after  their 
teachers  and  benefactors,  and  not  vice  versa;  3.  Luke  gives 
no  intimation  to  that  effect,  and  connects  the  name  Paul,  not 
with  that  of  the  Proconsul  of  Cyprus,  (xiii,  7,  12,)  but  with 
that  of  Elymas  (lie  sorcerer,  (verse  S.) 

The  last  circumstance  favors  the  ingenious  hypothesis  of  Dr. 
Lange,  that  the  name  expresses  the  symbolical  significance  of 
the  victory  of  Paul,  the  small  man  of  God,  over  Elymas,  the 
mighty  magician  of  the  devil,  :is  a  New  Testament  counter- 
part of  the  victory  of  David  over  Goliath,  or  of  Moses  over 
the  sorcerers  of  Egypt.  Dr.  Lange,  however,  admits  the 
probability  that  Paul  had  his  Roman  name  before  tin's 
occasion. 

At  all  events,  the  change  of  name  has  nothing  whatever  to 
do  with  his  conversion;  and  all  allegorical  interpretations  of 
Chrysostom,  Augustine,  Wordsworth,  and  others,  which  go  on 
this  assumption,  arc  merely  pious  fancies,  which   arc  suffi- 


424  Biblical  Monographs.  [July, 

ciently  refuted  by  the  fact  that  the  Apostle  is  repeatedly 
called  Said  long  after  his  conversion,  as  in  Acts  ix,  25,  30 ; 
xii,  25 ;  xiii,  1,  2,  7,  9 ;  and  that  it  is  said  of  Said  in  one  pas- 
sage (xiii,  9)  that  he  was  "  fdlcd  with  the  Holy  Ghost." 

I  add,  as  an  exegctical  curiosity,  the  view  of  Dr.  Words- 
worth, who,  in  his  Commentary  on  Acts  xiii,  9,  uncritically 
combines  all  the  various  interpretations  of  the  name,  except 
Dr.  Lange's,  which  was  then  not  yet  known  to  him,  and 
assigns  no  less  than  eight,  reasons  for  the  change  of  Saul  into 
Paul.  1.  Because  laZXog  was  a  purely  Jewish  name  ;  2.  Be- 
cause among  the  Greeks  it  might  expose  him  to  contempt,  as 
having  the  same  sound  as  oav?.og,  wanton;  (see  Homer,  Hymn 
Mercur,  28,  and  Ruhnken  in  loc.  ;)  3.  To  indicate  his  change 
and  call  to  a  new  life  from  a  Jew  to  a  Christian,  from  a  per- 
secutor to  a  preacher  of  the  Gospel;  4.  But  in  the  change 
much  of  the  original  name  was  left,  and  commemorated  what 
he  had;  hem.  The  fire  of  zeal  of  lavXog  still  glowed  in  the 
heart  of  ITavloq,  but  its  flame  was  purified  by  the  Holy  Ghost ; 
5.  His  new  name  denoted  also  his  mission  to  the  Gentiles,  the 
Romans  being  familiar  with  the  name  Paulus;  6.  It  was  a 
token  of  humility,  Paulus-parvulus,  (1  Cor.  xv,  9  ;)  7.  It  com- 
memorated the  cognomen  of  Paul's  first  (?)  convert,  Serghis 
Paulus,  and  was  a  good  augury  of  his  future  success  in  the 
Roman  world  ;  8.  It  indicates  Paul's  intended  supremacy  in 
the  Roman  or  Western  Church  as  distinct  from  the  Aramaic, 
name  Cephas,  and  the  Greek  name  Peter. 


TIIE  T.OOK  OF  EXOC1I. 
The  name  of  Mwch,  or  more  properly  Chanoch,  (Hebrew, 
Tj-irn,)  is  applied  to  four  Biblical  persons,  namely,  1.  To  the 
oldest  son  of  Cain,  (Gen.  iv,  17;)  2.  To  a  grandson  of  Abra- 
ham, (Gen.  xxv,  4;)  3.  To  the  oldest  son  of  Reuben,  (Gen. 
xlvi,  9  ;)  4.  To  a  descendant  of  Seth,  father  of  Methuselah 
and  great-grandfather  of  Noah,  (Gen.  v,  19,  22;  Heb.  \i.  5; 
Jude  14,  15.)  The  one  last  mentioned  is  alone  historically 
important;  first,  because  of  the  fragmentary  but  at  the  same 
time  interesting  accounts  in  the  Holy  Scriptures  concerning 
his  life  and  destiny;  and,  secondly,  because  of  the  various  tra- 


1809.1  Biblical  Monographs.  425 

ditions  concerning  him  and  the  apocryphal  book  bearing  his 
name,  and  mentioned  by  St.  Jude  in  his  epistle,  verses  14,  15. 

Enoch,  "  the  seventh  from  Adam,"  though  born  at  a  time 
when  the  human  family  had  increased  in  numbers  and  in  sin, 
"walked  with  God,"  and  therefore  ;c  pleased  him."  His  mind 
was  pure ;  his  spirit  rose  above  the  turmoil  of  worldliness  ;  he 
delighted  in  calm  communion  with  God.  Seth  addressed 
Jehovah  through  the  medium  of  the  word,*  (Gen.  iv,  2G,) 
Enoch  approached  him  by  the  still  more  spiritual  medium  of 
thought,  the  highest  form  of  religious  life  and  experience.  As 
a  reward  of  his  faith  and  piety,  and  probably  to  preserve  him 
from  being  contaminated  by  the  surrounding  evils,  " he  was 
not"  ("K^l,)  "for  God  took  him,"  (Gen.  v,  2-i;)  he  was  trans- 
lated that  he  should  not  see  death  ;  and  was  not  found,"  {nai 
ovk  evgcoKSTO,  6i6tl  jiert.0/]ic£v  avrbv  6  Of6c,  (Heb.  xi,  5.)  While 
the  biographies  of  most  of  the  patriarchs  close  with  the  sen- 
tence, "  and  he  died,"  that  of  Enoch  closes  with  the  suggest- 
ive words,  "He  was  not,  for  God  took  him."  Though  a 
descendant  of  a  sinful  race,  he  was  delivered  from  the  real  pun- 
ishment which  sin  had  inflicted  upon  the  human  family  ;  his 
existence  was  uninterrupted  ;  he  was  undying,  as  man  was 
originally  intended  to  be.  God  took  him  as  a  loving  father  to 
his  eternal  home  without  laying  him  under  the  necessity  of 
undergoing  the  ordinary  process  of  physical  dissolution. 

The  history  of  Enoch  may  justly  be  regarded  as  embodying 
profound  religious  truths,  and  as  furnishing  one  of  the  strongest 
proofs  of  the  belief  in  a  future  slate  prevailing  among  the 
early  Hebrews.  For  without  admitting  this  belief,  the  his- 
tory of  Enoch  is  a  perfect  mystery,  a  hieroglyph  without  a 
clue,  a  commencement  without  an  end.  But  admit  it,  and  the 
histories  and  songs  of  the  Old  Testament  become  intelligible 
and  beautiful;  and  instead  of  being  enveloped  in  the  gloomy 
clouds  of  despair  they  arc  luminous  with  rays  of  hope,  point- 
ing to  that  higher  and  holier  life,  to  that  immortality  fully 
brought  to  light  through  the  Gospel  of  our  Lord  Jesus 
Christ. 

The  translation  of  Enoch  n<>  doubt  gave  rise  1<>  many  tradi- 
tions that  were  handed  down  to  subsequent  generations,  and 
were  even  transplanted  to  the  Gentile  nations  of  the  ante- 
*Scc  Kalisch'ri  Commentary  on  Genesis  in  be. 


426  Biblical  Monographs.  [July, 

Christian  world.  It  is  known  that  the  classical  writers  men- 
tion such  translations  into  heaven.  They  assign  this  distinction, 
among  others,  to  Hercules,  to  Ganymede,  and  to  Romulus. 
(Liv.,  i,  16  ;  "nee  deinde  in  terrisfmt")  But  it  was  awarded 
to  them  either  for  their  valor  or  for  mere  physical  beauty, 
which  advantages,  though  valued  among  the  Hebrews,  were  not 
considered  by  them  as  sublime  or  godlike  ;  a  pious  life  alone 
deserved  and  obtained  the  crown  of  immortal  glory.  But  the 
idea  of  a  translation  into  heaven  is  not  limited  to  the  old  and 
ante-Christian  world  ;  it  was  familiar  to  some  of  the  tribes  of 
Central  America.  The  chronicles  of  Guatemala  record  four 
progenitors  of  mankind  who  were  suddenly  raised  to  heaven, 
and  the  documents  add  that  those  first  four  men  came  to 
Guatemala  from  the  other  side  of  the  sea,  from  the  East." 

Later  legends  have  busily  adorned  and  amplified  the  history 
of  Enoch.  An  apocryphal  book,  containing  all  the  traditions 
which  the  lapse  of  time  had  accumulated  concerning  him,  has 
been  written  under  his  name.  That  such  a  book,  bearing  his 
name  and  containing  his  supposed  prophecies,  etc.,  existed 
during  the  apostolic  time,  is  evident  from  the  fact  that  St. 
Jude  quotes  from  it.  (Jude  14,  15.)  Its  recent  discovery, 
contents,  author,  time  and  place  of  its  composition,  we  will 
briefly  consider  in  the  following  pages,  f 

In  1773  the  distinguished  British  traveler,  Sir  J.  Bruce,  dis- 
covered in  Abyssinia  three  manuscripts  in  the  Koptic  or  Ethi- 
opian language,  of  the  Book  of  Enoch  mentioned  in  Jude  11, 
15,  and  brought  them  to  Europe,  one  of  which  he  presented  to 
the  King  of  France,  and  the  oilier  two  to  the  library  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Oxford.  The  knowledge  of  the  existence  of  these 
manuscripts  in  Abyssinia  having  reached  Europe  as  early  as 
the  first  half  of  the  seventeenth  century,  their  discovery  caused 
naturally  a  great  stir  in  the  theological  world.  For  nearly  a 
quarter  of  a  century,  however,  they  lay  partially  neglected  in 
the  dusty  alcoves  of  these  libraries,  until,  in  1800,  Mons.  Dc 
Sacy,  of  Paris,  published  in  the  Magazin  Encyclop.,  (vol.  vi, 
torn.  i,p.  382,)  a  brief  historical  sketch,  together  with  a  Latin 
translation  of  a  few  chapters  of  the  Book  of  Enoch,  under  the 

♦  See  an  acfouut  of  these  chronicles  in  the  Athenaeum  of  May  31,  1856. 

fin  considering  these  points  results  only  arc  given,  and  not  the  processes  by 

Which  they  were  obtained. 


1869.]  Biblical  Monographs.  427 

title,  "Notice  sur  Ic  Livre  d'' Enoch  .^  This  sketch  was  trans- 
lated into  German  by  a  Dr.  F.  T.  Punk,  and  published  in  book 
form  in  1801.  In  1821  Prof.  11.  Laurence,  of  Oxford,  pub- 
lished an  English  translation,  with  note?,  of  the  Book  of  Enoch  ; 
a  second  edition  appeared  in  1833,  and  a  third  in  1S3S.  Since 
that  time  German  translations,  with  valuable  commentaries, 
were  published  by  A.  G.  Hoffmann,  1833  and  183S;  Riippel 
&  Gfrorrer,  1840,  and  Dillmann,  1853  ;  while  essays  and  crit- 
icisms were  written  on  it  by  Lucke,  Edward,  Murray,  Krieger, 
J.  Hoffmann,  Ewald,  Kostlin,  and  more  recently  by  llilgcn- 
feld.*  The  Ethiopian  text  was  published  by  Laurence  in 
'183S,  and  by  Dillmann  in  1851. 

The  contents  of  this  remarkable  book  are  divided,  according 
to  most  manuscripts,  besides  a  brief  introduction,  into  five 
parts,  nineteen  sections,  and  one  hundred  and  five  chapters, 
and  each  chapter  into  verses,  varying  in  number  from  one  to 
thirty-seven.  The  whole  book  would  make  a  duodecimo  vol- 
ume of  about  one  hundred  and  twenty-five  pages. 

In  the  introduction  the  book  is  characterized  as  a  revelation 
of  the  seer  Enoch  concerning  the  future  judgment  and  its  con- 
sequences upon  both  the  just  and  the  unjust,  namely,  eternal 
happiness  of  the  former  and  eternal  misery  of  the  latter. 
Chap,  i-v.r 

*Die  Judische  Apokalyptik,  pp.  91-184. 

\  At  tbe  close  of  the  first  chapter  of  this  introduction  occurs  the  celebrated  pas- 
sage quoted  by  St.  Jude  in  his  epistle,  (11,  15.)     So  as  not  to  break  the  connection 
we  will  give  the  entire  chapter  in  :•  Latin  translation.     Chap.  1.   "  Sermo  benedic- 
tionis  Enochi,  quomodo  benedixit  olectis  et  justis,  qui  futuri  sunt  in  die  afili 
ad  expellendum  (i.  e.  quando  expelielur)  omnera  iraprobura  ot  impium.    Locutus 
est,  et  dixit  Enoch,  vir  Justus,  qui  a  Domino  (wnit)  quo  tempore  ocuh*  eju! 
sunt,  et  vidit  visionem  sancti,  qui  in  coebs  est,  quem  osti  aderuut  mini  Ai 
audivi  ab  eia  omnia,  et  novi  ego  illud,  quod  vidi,  et  non  est  (i.  e.  n  »n  esse)  futurum 
in  hac  generatione,  sod  in  generations,  qua-  ventura  e^t  (bominum)  longe  dissi- 
torum,  propter  electos.     Dixi  et  locutua  sum  propter  eo  .  cu  a  (eo)  quod  exibit 
sanctus  et  magnus  de  tabernaculo  suo,  et  deus  mundi:  ot  inde  calcabit 
montem  Sina,  et  videbitur  in  tabernaculo  suo,  et  mauifestabitur  in  fortitudioe  vir- 
tutis  suae  de  ecelo,  et  pavebunt  omnes,  et  commovi  buutur  v-igiles,  et  capiet  c«s 
timor  ot  tremor  magnus  usque  ad  fines   I  eme,  et  a  istcrnabuntur  n 
et  deprimentur  colics  sublimes,  et  I  :ut  mel  favi  pi 

getur  terra,  ot  i  tea  sunt,  peribunt,  ot  crit  judicium  super  omnes,  i 

justos;  quoad  justos  autora,  pacem  faciet  ois,  *.t  Boruabit  eli  ctos,  et  erit  d( 
super  eos,  et  omnes  erunt  Dei  (roii  ft  <ri )  el  oi  unt  fecilcs,  ot  benedieentur,  et  E ; 
Dei  lucescot  eia,     Et  venit  cum  my  torum,  ut  foci  per  eos, 

etperdat  impios,  et  litiget  cum  omnibus  carnalibus,  pro  omnibus,  quaefeeerunt  et  cj<c- 


42S  Biblical  Monographs.  [July, 

Part  I  opens  -with  an  account  of  the  fall  of  angels,  their 
marriage  with  the  daughters  of  men,  and  the  consequent  race 
of  giants,  (Gen.  vi,  1-8;)  of  their  spreading  dangerous  arts 
among  men,  thereby  increasing  their  wickedness,  and  of 
Enoch  being  sent  to  them  to  announce  to  the7n  the  judgments 
of  God  with  which  he  would  destroy  them.  Chap,  vi-xvi. 
Then  follows  a  description  of  the  journeys  of  Enoch  through 
the  earth  and  the  lower  heaven,  accompanied  by  angels,  who 
explained  to  him  all  the  mysterious  places  and  things  he  saw. 
These  mysteries  revealed  to  mankind  are  to  strengthen  their 
faith  in  God,  the  creator  and  preserver  of  all  things  and  the 
judge  of  all  men.    Chap,  xvii-xxxvi. 

Part  TI  opens  with  an  account  of  Enoch's  "second  vision  of 
wisdom.'1  It  is  divided  into  three  sections  or  "  parables," 
(chap,  xxxvii-xliv,  xlv-lvii,  lviii-lxxi.)  It  continues  to  narrate 
his  journeys  through  the  highest  heaven,  receiving  revelations  of 
its  splendors  and  beatitudes,  and  of  the  consummated  kingdom 
and  glory  of  the  Messiah.  In  Part  I  he  describes  natural 
places  and  objects,  in  Part  II  the  supernatural.  In  the  first 
he  uses  a  plain  narrative  stylo,  here  the  prophetic  and  para- 
bolic. 

In  Part  III,  (chap,  lxxii-lxxxii,)  entitled  "  The  Book  of  the 
Revolutions  of  the  Lights  of  Heaven,"  are  described  the  revo- 
lutions of  the  sun,  moon,  and  stars,  and  the  consequent  changes 
in  the  days,  months,  seasons,  and  years,  and  their  relation  to 
each  other.  The  "  winds  of  heaven  "  and  their  effects,  ami  the 
most  important  mountains,  rivers,  and  islands  of  the  earth  are 
also  mentioned.  With  this  part  the  account  of  .Enoch's  jour- 
neys closes. 

Part  IV  (chap,  lxxxii-xci)  contains  the  "dream-visions" 
which  Enoch  had  in  his  youth  concerning  the  development  and 

rati  sunt  contra  eum,  )■•  scatores  et  impii."    The  Greek  text,  with  some  of  the  viri- 
ons reading,   is  as  follows:  'ldoi,  i/'/Jh  Ktigioc  iv  [tvytaiiv  uyiaic  (or,  tv  ii)tcic 
ftvQLur.iv,  or.  a-. .'cif  ayyiXkCtv,  or,  &yiov  ayytTJk&v)  avrov,  ~":l;oui  (or,  tov  T:oiF;cai) 
K(iiaiv  kqtu  -dvruv,  Kai  kt-e?.£y£ai  (or,  eMyfct)  -dvrur  ru'vr  ioefteic  air,: n . 
ttuvtuv  tuv  loyw  oac'3iiag  (or,  loyuv  irovrJQw)  airruv  Sn>  ijoiprjoav,  kcu  negt  travruv 
tuv  okXijouv  (?mj<jv)  Ctv  c?.&%noav  kit'  airov  i/xnoTuXoi  uaijhir.     "Beb   Id,   I 
Lord  cometh  with  ten  thousands  of  his  Baints  to  execute  judgment  u;k>:i  all, 
convince  all  that  arc  ungodly  among  them  of  all  their  ungodly  deeds  which  thej 
have  ungodly  committed,  and  of  all  their  hard  speeches  which  ungodly  Manors  1  .■-. 
tpokeu  against  him," 


1S09J  Biblical  Monographs.  429 

consummation  of  the  history  of  man.  Of  these  "  dream-visions" 
there  are  two  kinds ;  the  first  relating-  to  the  judgment  of  God, 
the  flood,  to  be  sent  upon  mankind  soon  after  his  departure 
from  earth;  and  the  second  relating  to  the  entire  history  of 
man  from  Adam  down  to  the  judgment  of  the  great  da}-,  and 
the  final  consummation  of  the  Messiah's  kingdom.  A  brief 
paternal  address  to  his  descendants  closes  this  part.  Fitly 
joined  to  this  is 

Part  Y,  (chap,  xcii-cviii,)  called  the  "Book  of  Doctrines  and 
Exhortations.*'  Ilere  Enoch  is  exhorting  first  his  immediate 
family,  and  then  all  the  inhabitants  of  the  earth,  with  all  the 
love  and  earnestness  of  a  departing  father,  to  be  faithful  and 
steadfast,  and  to  flee  the  manifold  sins  and  errors  which  in  the 
course  of  time  would  prevail  upon  the  earth,  and  on  account 
of  which  God's  eternal  judgments  would  be  visited  upon  the 
godless  and  wicked.  Finally,  the  book  closes  with  a  brief 
account  of  some  wonderful  signs  that  would  become  visible  at 
the  birth  of  Noah,  typifying  the  coming  retribution. 

As  to  the  real  author  of  this  wonderful  book,  and  the  time  and 
place  of  its  composition,  different  opinions  prevail.  So  much 
is  certain,  however,  that  it  was  not  written  by  Enoch,  "the 
seventh  from  Adam."  But  most 'of  its  critics  agree  that  it  is 
an  indisputable  fact  that  in  its  present  form  it  was  composed 
before  the  canon  of  the  New  Testament  closed,  and  that  its 
chief  portions,  at  least,  were  written  by  a  Jew  of  Palestine,  in 
the  Hebrew  language,  more  than  a  hundred  years  before  the 
birth  of  Christ.  Whether  he  belonged  to  the  sect  of  the  Es- 
senes  or  the  Pharisees,  or  to  neither,  is  not  certain.  Probably 
he  was  one  of  those  "pious  men  "  of  the  Asmonsean  period 
who  took  no  part  in  the  doctrinal  quarrels  of  these  two  sects, 
but  in  the  strictest  obedience  to  the  letter  of  the  law  lived  a 
severely  righteous  life,  and  wailed  patiently  for  the  coming  of 
the  Messianic  kingdom. 

As  to  the  integrity  of  the  book,  it  is  admitted  by  most 
critics  that  additions  and  interpolations  have  been  made. 
These  are  said  to  occur  in  chapters  x,  L-3;  xx;  liv,  7-lv,  2 ;  Ix; 
lxv-lxix,  25  ;  lxx ;  lxxx,  9-20  ;  and  cvi  ;  but  they  do  not  ma- 
terially change  tin:  connection.  In  its  present  form  it  is  one 
of  the  most  interesting  literary  monuments  extant  of  the  time 
between  the  close  of  the  Old  Testament  canon  and  the  begin- 


430  Biblical  Monograjrfis.  [July, 

ning  of  the  Christian  era.  It  gives  us  an  insight  into  the 
religious  life  and  prophetic  theology  of  that  period  ;  and  in  the 
absence  of  an  inspired  account,  may  be  relied  upon  as  tolera- 
bly correct  data  of  the  Messianic  and  eschatological  hopes  and 
views  entertained  by  the  pious  of  that  period. 

We  may  add,  with  regard  to  the  history  of  this  extraordi- 
nary book,  that  when  it  appeared  it  was  evidently  read  with 
eager  interest ;  that  it  was  soon  translated  into  Greek,  and 
from  Greek  into  the  Ethiopian  dialect ;  that  not  only  the  later 
apocryphal  writings,  as  for  instance,  the  "Book  of  the  Jubi- 
lees,'- and  the  "Testament  of  the  Twelve  Patriarchs,"  but 
most  of  the  fathers  of  the  Church  down  to  the  time  of  Augus- 
tine and  Jerome,  used  and  quoted  it ;  that,  however,  from  this 
period  it  fell  into  almost  entire  oblivion,  and  was.  with  the 
exception  of  a  few  fragments  of  the  learned  monk  Syncellus, 
at  the  end  of  the  eighth  century,  and  some  allusions  in  Rab- 
binical writers,  almost  totally  forgotten. * 

As  to  the  question,  'Whether  the  book  under  consideration 
is  the  same  quoted  by  St.  Jude,  and  frequently  mentioned  by 
the  Church  fathers,  most  critics  answer  in  the  affirmative.f 
But  we  are  not  to  conclude  therefrom  that  it  ever  posseted 
the  authority  of  a  canonical  book.  The  mere  fact  that  the 
Apostle  Jude  quotes  from  it  docs  not  invest  it  with  such  an 
authority  any  more  than  the  works  of  the  Greek  poet  and  the 
Cretiau  prophet,  from  which  the  Apostle  Paul  quotes,  (Acts 
xvii,  28;  Titus  i,  12,)+  are  to  be  invested  with  this  dignity. 
Most  of  the  Church  fathers,  with  the  exception  of  Tertullian. 
considered  it  as  belonging  among  the  apocryphal  books  of  that 
age ;  and  Origen,  at  the  beginning  of  the  third  century,  ex- 
pressly declares  that  the  Church  never  considered  it  as  an  in- 
spired    work  :    tv   ralr   tfcichpinig    ov    tAvv    <f>igerai    &g    Oeia.^ 

♦See  IV.  Hoffmann's  edition  of  the  Book  of  Enoch.  Introd.  Also,  Dr.  Dill- 
mann's  Introd.  to  his  edition.     Also,  Kalisch's  Comment.,  Gon.  v. 

■|  See  Introd  and  Comment  to  Hoffman's  Enoch.  Also,  Dillman's  Introd.  to  the 
Look  of  Enoch. 

|  "For  iri  him  wo  live,  and  move,  and  have  our  being;  as  certain  also  of  jrour 
own  poets  have  said,   For  we  are  also  his   ofiapriug."       "  One  of  thei 
even  a  prophet  of  their  own,  said,  'J  1.  •  Ci cti  i     are  always  liars,  evil  beastf 
bellies." 

gSco  Orig.,  Contra  Celsum,  p.  201.     lid.  Sponc.     Celsus  tool 
braid  the  Christians  for  their  credulity  in  believing,  as  he  says,  the  visions  of 
Enoch,  not  knowing  that  the  book  had  no  canonical  authority. 


1869.]  Biblical  Monographs.  431 

Jerome,  in  his  "Catal.  Scriptor.  Apost.  sub  nom.  Judas,"  says, 
"  Judas  frater  Jacobi,  parvam  quidem,  quae  de  septem  Catho- 
licis  est,  epistolam  reliquit.  Et  quia  de  libro  Enoch,  qui 
apocryphus  est,  in  ea  assumit  testimonium,  a  plcrisque  rejici- 
tur."  And  again  he  says  in  his  Commentary  on  Psalm 
exxii,  3  :  " Manifestissimus  liber  est,  (speaking  of  the  Book  of 
Enoch,)  et  inter  apocryphos  computatur,  et  vcteres  interpretes 
de  isto  locuti  sunt ;  nonnulla  autem  nos  diximus,  non  in  aucto- 
ritatcm  sed  in  commemorationcm." 

We  might  multiply  quotations  from  the  Church  fathers  to 
show  that  the  Book  of  Enoch  never  possessed  the  authority  of 
a  canonical  book  in  the  early  Church;  but  the  above  will 
suffice.  ]Sror  is  the  Epistle  of  St.  Jude  to  be  rendered  sus- 
picious (as  some  critics  have  attempted  to  do)  on  account  of 
its  containing  a  quotation  from  this  book',  fur  on  the  same 
ground  they  might  suspect  the  authenticity  of  the  address  of 
the  Apostle  Paul  to  the  Athenians,  (Acts  xvii,)  and  of  his 
letter  to  Titus,  because  both  contain  quotations  from  profane 
writers.     To  argue  thus  is  simply  preposterous. 

From  what  has  been  said  it  is  evident  that  this  remarkable 
apocryphal  book  was  well  known  and  carefully  studied  in  the 
early "  Church,  probably  because  it  embodies  several  of  the 
leading  ideas  of  the  New  Testament,  and  insists  with  all  the 
earnestness  of  the  old  prophets  upon  the  renewal  and  restora- 
tion of  the  pure  BiUical  faith,  combating  with  equal  energy 
the  corruptions  of  rabbinical  interpretation  and  the  inroads  of 
Greek  philosophy,  traditional  exaggeration,  and  undue  em- 
bellishment. And  if  we  are  not  mistaken  it  will  probably,  at 
some  time  or  other,  be  used  as  a  witness  in  the  history  of  re- 
ligious dogmas,  and  for  that  reason  it  deserves  even  now  a 
careful  study.  ( 

ST.  PAUL'S  CLOSING  PJ3AN.—ROM.  via,  31-39. 

The  first  eight  chapters  of  Romans  embrace  Paul's  great  argu- 
ment of  the  epic  of  redemption.  '    It  traces  human  ruin  and 
human  salvation  until,  at  viii,  30,  the  whole  scheme,  crowned 
with  glorification,  stands  like  a  grand  structure,  and  the  Ap 
commences  a  paean  with,  What  Bhall  we  say  to  these  thin 

The  semi-poetical  character  of  this  paean  is  evident  from  its 
phenomena  of  number.     Tin  re  are  three  interrogatories  of  ad- 


432  Biblical  Monographs.  [July, 

miration,  verses  31,  32 ;  three  challenges  to  the  foes  of  the  re- 
deemed to  accuse,  to  condemn,  or  to  separate,  verse  35 ;  seven 
earthly  foes  are  challenged  by  name,  verse  35 ;  and  ten  tran 
scendental  potencies  arc  defied  as  unable  to  sever  the  believer 
from  Christ,  verses  38,  39. 

In  regard  to  the  sacred  numbers,  three  and  seven,  the  reader 
may  consult  the  supplementary  note  in  our  commentary  to 
Luke  vi,  13.     The  number  ten  we  shall  soon  discuss. 

Our  present  purpose  is  to  call  attention  to  the  two  cata- 
logues of  potencies,  namely,  the  seven  terrene  and  the  ten  tran- 
scendent, which  are  challenged  and  defied  successfully  to  assail 
the  Christian  persistently  adhering  to  Christ,  This  sevenfold 
list  is  furnished  in  confirmation  of  the  third  challenge,  Who 
shall  accuse?  Who  cendemneth?  Who  shaU  separate?  He 
finally  calls  the  roll  and  challenges  the  seven,  one  by  one — ■ 
"  tribulation,  distress,  persecution,  famine,  nakedness,  peril, 
sword.3' 

As  seven  is  rather  a  gracious  than  a  hostile  number,  we 
should  hardly  expect  the  Christian's  foes  to  be  symbolized  under 
it.  But  it  is  from  the  victories  over  them  that  the  Apostle 
assigns  this  favorable  number;  counting  out  seven  martyr  tri- 
vjnphs.  The  foes  are  none  of  them  living  beings,  but  all  abstrac- 
tions, yet  implying  a  fierce  human  authorship  behind  them. 
They  are  all  terrible;  none  of  them  seductive  or  tempting  ene- 
mies. They  are  the  terrors  and  trials  of  which  the  Apostle's 
own  personal  history  was  full,  and  which  rose,  doubtless,  in 
their  awful  shapes,  to  his  memory  as  he  wrote.  How  sublime 
the  sense  of  divine  strength  and  triumph  in  his  own  soul  as  he 
consciously  felt  their  impotence  to  break  the  tie  between  him 
and  his  crucified  Lord!  There  seems  something  almost  pro- 
phetic, however,  in  the  fact  that  tin-  catalogue  closed  in  this 
enumeration,  as  it  did  in  the  Apostle's  history,  with  the  sword/ 
Without  the  gates  of  the  very  Rome  to  which  he  was  now 
writing  the  executioner's  sword  was  in  a  few  brief  years  to 
close  the  catalogue  of  his  sufferings  and  triumphs.  The;  foes 
were  strong,  but  his  love  to  Christ  was  still  stronger.  Wisely 
did  the  wise  king  say,  (Sol.  Song,  viii,  6,  7,)  "Love  is  strong 
as  death.  Many  waters  cannot  quench  love,  neither  can  the 
floods  drown  it." 

A  curious  parallel  to  this  cnumerative  seven  is  the  inventory 


1869.]  Biblical  Monographs.  433 

of  Abraham's  wealth  in  Gen.  xii,  1G :  "Sheep  and  oxen,  and 
he-asses  and  men-servants,  and  maid-servants  and  she-asses 
and  camels."  Here,  in  allusion,  doubtless,  to  its  fulfilling  the 
covenant  blessing  upon  him,  the  number  is  seven,  elaborately 
wrought  out  by  counting  males  and  females,  paralleling  sexu- 
ally he-asses  and  men-servants  against  maid-servants  and  she- 
asses,  but  keeping  the  seven  by  making  no  sexual  division  of 
the  camels. 

The  ten  potencies,  in  verses  3S,  30,  for  transcend  the  seven, 
rising  grandly  above  the  earthly  and  the  human,  and  spreading 
out.  upon  the  wide  universe.  Elements  of  the  most  widely 
different  nature  are  selected,  a  tinge  of  personification  pervad- 
ing them  all.  So  vast  and  shadowy,  indeed,  so  unique  and 
unparalleled  with  other  passages  are  the  idealities  with  which 
Paul's  conception  here  surrounds  him,  that  few  commentators 
have  seemed  quite  able  to  rise  into  a  full  comprehension  of 
their  import.  Nor  does  the  Apostle  select  them  as  possessing 
essentially  a  malignant,  hostile,  or  infernal  nature;  but  as 
endowed  with  unmeasured  power,  if  they  were  called  to  exert 
it  hostilely.  Just  so,.in  Gal.  i,  S,  he  selects  an  angel  from 
heaven  as  the  hypothetical  announcer  of  a  rival  Gospel.  lie 
sends  his  voice  of  challenge  through  the  vastitudes  of  the  uni- 
verse, defying  their  power  to  break  the  love  between  Christ 
and  his  redeemed. 

As  Fletcher  of  Madelcy  somewhere  beautifully  says,  Not  all 
the  powers  of  hell  can  separate  the  Christian  from  his  Saviour; 
not  all  the  powers  of  heaven  will  do  it;  none  can  or  will, 
unless  the  man  himself. 

Erasmus  says  there  is  nothing  in  Cicero  superior  in  eloquence 
to  this  passage  of  the  Apostle.  But  there  is  nothing  in  Cicero 
so  in  the  same  style  as  to  be  suitably  brought  into  comparison. 
The  passage  is  rather  poetic  than  oratorical  ;  rising  into  regions 
into  which  secular  oratory  at  least,  like  Cicero's,  rarely  ascend-. 
Horace,  though  a  pagan  port,  gives  a  picture  of  the  firmly 
just  man,  which,  though  immensely  inferior  1<»  this  grand 
passage,  is  not  unworthy  to  be  brought  into  comparison. 

Justiim  ac  teuacem  propi  riti  vinitn, 

Non  eivium  ardor  prava  jubentium 

Non  VTlltua  instatltis  tyniTUii 

Mento  quatit  Bolida ;  uequo  AuBter 


43  i  Biblical  Monographs.  [July, 

Dux  inquieti  turbidus  Hadrise 

Nee  fulminantis  magna  manna  Jovis : 

Bi  fractus  illabatur  orbis 

Impavidum  ferient  ruinse. 

The  man,  just,  and  firm  of  purpose, 

No  popular  excitement  enjoining  crime, 
No  face  of  menacing  tyrant 
Shakes  from  his  steady  mind;  nor  south-blast 

Stormy  lord  of  the  restless  Hadrian  sea 
Nor  the  great  hand  of  fulminating  Jove : 
Should  the  shattered  firmament  fall 
Its  ruins  would  strike  him  fearless. 

Were  we  to  apply  predestinariau  exegesis  to  the  words  of 
Horace,  we  should  hold  him  as  denying  that  a  just  man  ever 
ceases  to  be  just,  and  so  make  the  epicurean  poet  a  good 
Calvinist. 

The  number  ten  appears  to  symbolize  the  mundane  or  uni- 
versal, usually  in  its  secular  or  profane  aspects; 'and  that  in 
distinction  often,  but  not  always,  from  the  sacred,  especially 
from  the  elect  of  God.  The  ten  horns  of  Daniel  and  John  are 
the  ten  worldly  kingdoms.  The  ten  plagues  of  Egypt,  the  type 
of  the  world  power,  were  a  judicial  penalty  upon  the  profane. 
The  ten  commandments  are  judicial  and  mundane.  The  first 
ten  pedigrees  of  Genesis,  as  being  a  thread  of  mundane  history, 
embrace  each  just  ten  generations.  Ten  multiplied  into  seven 
gives  us  the  seventy  mundane  nations.  (See  our  Commentary 
on  Luke  x,  1-16.)  The  Apostle  marshals  his  ten  potencies  in 
four  couplets  (each  couplet  linked  by  an  and)  and  two  units. 
Thereby  the  ten  is  divided  into  two  fives;  each  live  contains 
two  couplets,  followed  and  closed  by  one  unit. 

Death  and  Life,  Angels  and  Principalities, 

Powers, 
Presents  and  Futures,  Heights  and  Depths, 

Creature. 

It  was  from  want  of  knowing  litis  remarkably  exact  numera- 
tion and  parallelism  that  Alt'ord,  in  his  note  on  the  word  )>ow(r$ 
says,  "Some  confusion,  evidently,  has  crept  into  the  arrange- 
ment." 

The  first  couplet  embraces  the  two  potencies  of  existence; 
the   second  of  living   spiritual   agencies ;   and   the    unit   the 


18G9.3  Biblical  Monographs.  435 

potency  of  force.  The  third  couplet  presents  the  potencies 
of  time,  the  fourth  of  space,  and  the  last  unit,  of  general 
Jinitude.     Upon  -which  we  offer  the  following  norcs : 

Verse  38.  Neither  death  nor  life — The  two  potencies  of  exist- 
ence, v&mely,  the  two  stages  of  human  existence,  life  and  death. 
These  are  both  mighty  powers  over  human  destiny.  Personi- 
fied life  is  armed  with  terrible  dangers,  and  death  is  the  very 
king  of  terrors.  Nor  angels  nor  principalities — Two  potencies 
of  living  agents  in  the  supersensible  spiritual  world.  Angels 
throughout  scripture  are  the  messengers  of  God,  armed  often 
with  divine  authorities.  Principalities  are  the  ranks  and  orders 
of  beings  in  the  background,  never  appearing  to  human  view, 
and  but  dimly  presupposed  and  rarely  alluded  to  in  scripture. 
The  Jews  assigned  various  ranks  to  the  beings  of  the  invisible 
world ;  arid  they  were  doubtless  correct  in  assuming  the  exist- 
ence of  ranks  and  orders,  though  we  have  no  reason  to  imag- 
ine that  their  description  of  those  orders  was  accurate,  or 
drawn  from  an}-  revelation.  So  Paul  in  Col.  i,  1C  speaks  very 
indefinitely  of  thrones,  dominions,  principalities)  powers: 
and  in  Eph.  i,  21,  principled  It  >j, power,  might,  dominion,  anal 
wery  thing  named  in  this  'world  and  that  to  come.  All  of 
which  intimates  that  the  Kew  Testament,  by  a  glimpse  into 
the  spiritual  world,  authorizes  the  belief  of  a  great  variety  of 
classifications  without  giving  us  any  distinct  description  of 
their  nature.  They  come  but  very  slightly  within  the  range 
of  the  redemptive  scheme,  and  so  scarce  within  the  limits  of 
the  purpose  of  Scripture  revelation.  Nor  powers — Perhaps 
including  the  grand  physical  forces  of  universal  nature 
known  to  science,  especially  to  astronomy,  in  the  abstract, 
but  sometimes  personified  in  Scripture  as  living  agencies, 
and  even  identified  with  angels.  From  the  Creek  word 
dwautig  comes  our  dynamics,  dynamical.  And  then  we  have 
a  sublime  conclusion.  Not  all  the  forces  that  move  the 
astronomic  worlds  could  separate  the  redeemed  from  Christ. 
This  is  a  thought  which  was  not  fully  taken  in  by  the 
Apostle's  mind,  yet  his  words  seem  pregnantwitb  it,  and  li  git- 
imately  express  it  to  us.  This  unit,  powers,  after  the  two 
couplets,  finishes  the  first  five  of  the  ten,  as  the  other  unit, 
creature,  finishes  the  second  five.  Nor  things  present  nor 
things  to  come — Two  potencies  of  time,  embracing  the  vicis- 


430 


Biblical  Monographs. 


[July, 


situdes    of   tlie    present    and    the   unknown  revolutions   of 
the  future. 

Verse  39.  Nor  height^  nor  depth — Two  antithetic  potencies  of 
space.  The  interpretation  of  heighths  and  depths  as  equiv- 
alent to  heaven  and  hell  is  altogether  incommensurate  with  the 
Apostle's  conception.  He  designates  the  opposite  extremes  of 
immensity.  Height  indicates  the  sublimit)*  of  loftiness  or 
grandeur ;  depth  the  sublimity  of  darkness,  obscurity,  and  ter- 
ror. Both  personified  suggest  limitless  power  for  unknown 
destruction.  Any  other  creature — Any  other  nature  or  being, 
save  God  and  the  man  himself.  Only  these  two  (neither  of 
whom  are  named  in  the  list)  can  work  the  terrible  separation  ; 
the  former  never  will  ;  the  dread  alternative  rests  solely  with 
the  latter. 


Aiit.  VHI.— FOREIGN  RELIGIOUS  INTELLIGENCE. 


PEOTESTAtfTISU. 
GREAT  BRITAIN. 
tltt:  disestablishment  of  the  imsit 
Chubch — Main-  Features  op  the  Bill 
— Its  Passage  in  tut:  House  of  Com- 
mons.— The  great  battle  in  England  for 
the  disestablishment  and  disendowment 
of  the  Irish  Church  lias  been  vigorously 
carried  on  during  tlie  pasl  three  months. 
The  bill  was  introduced  by  Mr.  Glad- 
stone on  the  lirst  of  March,  when  it  was 
read  a  first  time;  on  the  twenty-fourth 
of  the  same  month,  after  a  debate  which 
will  ever  remain  memorable  in  the  Parlia- 
mentary annals  of  Great  Britain;  il  was 
passed  to  a  second  reading  by  the  large 
majority  of  US,  the  numbers  being  for 
the  second  reading  368,  against  ii  250. 
The  BUI  which  is  to  produce  so  radical 
a  change  in  the  Anglic  a  I 
tains  sixty  claus  s  Its  full  title  is:  "A 
BUI  to  put  an  end  to  the  Establishment 
of  the  Church  of  Ireland,  and  to  make 
provision  in  respect  to  the  Temporalities 
thereof,  and  in  respect  to  the  Royal 
Coll(  -■-  of  Maynootli,  1  i  \v.  feat- 
ures of  tli  n  ■  -ire  are  a<  foil 
First,  as  to  d  ant.    This  will 

bo  total,  but  it  will  not  take  effect  until 
the  first  of  January.  Isll.  On  that  day 
the  ecclesiastical  courts  will  be  abolished, 
the  ecclesiastical  laws  will  ceaso  to  have 
any  authority,  the  Bishops  will  be  no 


longer  Peers  of  Parliament,  and  all 
ecclesiastical  corporations  in  the  country 
will  be  dissolved.  Seam  Uy,  as  to  disen- 
don  :■  '.  Technical!)  and  legally  this 
will  be  total  and  immediate.  The  pres- 
ent Irish  Ecclesiastical  Commission  is  at 
once  to  be  wound  up,  and  a  new  Com- 
mission,  composed  oft  -.  is  to 

be  constituted,  in  which  the  entire 
property  of  tlie  Irish  Church  will  vest 
from  the  day  on  which  the  measure 
receives  the  Royal  assent  A  distinction 
will  be  made  between  public  endow- 
ments, including  everything  in  the  nature 
of  a  State  grant  or  a  State  reserve,  and 

endowments,  which  Mr.  Glad- 
stone defines  as  money  contributed  from 
private  Sources  since  the  year  1GG0. 
The   former  I  i  led    by    the 

State;  tlie  latter  will  be  restored  to  the 

lished  Church.  The  value  of  the 
public  endowments  is  estimated  at 
£15,500,000;  the  valui  of  private  en- 
dowments is  put  at  £500,000.  Tltirdly, 
as   to  ;  First  of  all, 

compensation  has  io  be  made  t<   \ 

■ 
with  M  ■  the  J 

in  receipt  of  tlie  Ret  '       D 

;est   i- 
that  tif  incumbi  nts.  .  at  of 

■ 
ducting   what   he  may    have  paid   for 
curates,  will  be  Bccured  to  him  during 


1869.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


437 


his  life,  provided  he  continues  to  dis- 
charge the  duties  of  his  benefice.  Under 
certain  circumstances  this  interest  may, 

upon  his  own  application,  be  commuted 
for  a  life  annuity.  The  next  class  of 
interest  is  that  of  curates,  permanent 
and  temporary.  Next  will  come  lay 
compensations,  the  largest  pari  of  which 
will  be  absorbed  by  parish  clerks  and 
sextons.  The  amount  of  the  Maynooth 
endowment  and  the  Presbyterian  ll.gium 
Donum  will  be  valued  at  fourteen  years' 
purchase,  and  a  capital  sum  equal  to 
that  amount  will  be  handed  over  to  the 
respective  representatives  of  the  Presby- 
terians and  Roman  Catholics.  Alto- 
gether these  payments  will  amount  to 
about  £8,000,000,  leaving  about  £  ?,500,- 
000,  or  an  annual  sum  of  £30.000,  to  the 
disposal  of  Parliament.  This  will  bo 
appropriated  "  mainly  to  the  relief  of 
unavoidable  calamity  and  suffering."  but 
at  the  same  time  in  a  way  that  will  not 
interfere  with  the  obligation  imposed 
upon  property  by  the  Poor  Law.  When 
the  affairs  of  the  Established  Church 
shall  have  been  wound  up.  the  Com- 
missioners will  report  to  the  Queen  that 
the  objects  immediately  contemplated  by 
the  Act  have  all  been  provided  for,  and 
that  such  and  such  a  surplus  is  available 
for  charitable  purposes.  Fourthly,  as  to 
private  endowments.  These  are  to  be 
handed  over  to  the  disestablished  Church. 
The  Government  "presume"  that  im- 
mediately after  the  disestablishment  the 
bishops,  clergy,  and  laity  of  the  Church 
will  proceed  to  constitute  for  themselves 
something  in  the  nature  of  a  "governing 
body,"  and  power  will  be  given  to  the 
Queen  in  Council  "  not  to  create  such  a 
body,  but  to  recogni/.e  it  when  created." 
During  the  passage  of  the  Bill  through 
Committee  of  the  House,  the  Conserva- 
tives in  vain  attempted  to  modify  some 
of  its  most  important  provisions.  All 
their  amendments  were  rejected  by 
majorities  of  about  one  hundred. 

SPA  IX. 

Pkorgamzatiok  of  run  Reformed 
Spanish  Chgbch — Tub  Provisioxs  or 
THE  NEW  CONSrnTTION  ON  Reugiocs 
Toleration. — In  the  January  number 
of  the  "Methodist  Quarterly  Review" 
wo  referred  to  th<  suddi  u  and  ;  ratifying 
opening  which  the  Spanish  revo! 
of  September,  L868,  bad  prepared  for 
Protestantism  in  what  was  commonly 
regarded  as  the  most  fanatical  and  ul- 
tramontane   country     of     the     Roman 

Foubth  Series,  Vol.  XXI.-- 


Catholic  world,  and  we  gave  a  brief  out- 
line of  the  previous  history  of  Spai 
Protestantism.  The  history  of  the  six 
momhs  which  have  since  elapsed  is  full 
of  promise  and  encouragem  nl  for  the 
future. 

The   representatives   of   the   Sp 
people,   chosen    by  uuiversal    suffrage, 
have    met   in   a   Constituent    Cortes   and 
elaborated  a  uewconstil       m,  wl 
provisions  on  religious  affairs  is  rery  dif- 
ferent from  the  laws  which,  with  h; 
any  interruptions,  have  reigi  ed  in  Spai*; 
during    the    last   three    hundred   year-. 
When  the  time  of  election  .  | 
was  generally  known  by  the  people  that, 
next  to  the  question  whether  Spain  is  to 
have  in  future  a  monarchical  or  republi- 
can   form   of  government,   the   n  li 
question  would  be  the  must  import) 
be  decided  by  the  Cortes.     The.  views  of 
most  of  the  candidates  on  this  subject 
were  well  known;  and  it  n 
be  justly  assumed,  that,  on  t  i 
views  and  votes  of  the  deputies  repre- 
sented  the  sentiments  of  the   Spanish 
people.     The  draft  of  the  new  constitu- 
tion, as  prepared  by  a  special  Commit- 
tee of  Fifteen,  contained    the   foil 
articles  on  religion:  "The  nation  bin   •     ■ 
self  to  maintain  the  worship  and  minis- 
ters of  the  Catholic  religion.     The  public 
or  private  exercise  of  anj  otl  er  form  of 
worship  is  guaranteed  to  ail   foreigners 
resident  in   Spain   without  any  I  . 
limitations  than  those   of  morality  and 
right.     It'  any  Spaniards  shall  pri   ess  a 
religion  other  than  the  Catholic,  .ad  that 
the  last  paragraph  provides  i 
to    them."     All   the  priests    who 
members  of  the  Constituent  Cortes — the 
Cardinal    Archbishop    of   Santi  go,    the 
Bishop  of  Jaen,  ami  Canon  Manterola — 
violeutly  opposed  the  rights  conceded  in 
tin  50   articl  -   t  >   Protestants,  and    de- 
manded the  continuance  of  the  I 
laws,  which  forbade  the  e\ 
non-Catholic    n  ligion.      With  them,   i  f 
course,  vot<  d  all  the  adherents  ■■!"  the  ex- 
Queen  and  the  I  Dty  in 
number,  and  about  as  many 
bers  of  tho  1 
litical  reasons,   wished  to   pres< 

us  uniformity  of  the  conutr)  ;  '  til 
: -,     the     !  >'  i: 
and  the  Ropu  iu  de- 

nouncing the  i  iruii  r  iutol  raul  i  ■••.  -.  and 
tin    Republicans  unanimously  den 
completo  separation  bet  I 

Mate,  and  lull  rcligiOU  "  ev<  ry 

form  of  belief    They  did  not  cany  their 
28 


43S 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


TJuly. 


point;  but  one  of  them  (Castolar)  mode 
in  favor  of  religious  freedom  the  greatest 
and  most  impressive  speech  of  thewbole 
session,  in  which  he  paid  a  beautiful 
tribute  to  the  Protestant  countries.  The 
majority  of  the  Cones  adopted  the  Con- 
stitution as  it  had  been  drafted  by  the 
Committee,  and.  after  its  promulgation  on 
the  fifth  of  June,  religious  toleration  be- 
came, the  law  of  the  land.  The  mani- 
festations of  public  opinion  relative  to 
the  discussion  of  the  articles  on  religion 
in  the  Cortes  clearly  indicated  that  the 
Spanish  people  are  much  less  priest-ridden 
and  fanatical  than  has  commonly  been 
supposed.  In  every  part  of  the  country 
a  strong  sympathy  with  the  new  laws 
on  religion  was  shown,  and  the  steady 
growth  of  the  Republican  party  indicates 
thai  even  complete  separation  between 
Church  and  State,  and  absolute  freedom 
of  religion,  may  be  hoped  for  at  no  dis- 
tant day. 

For  fourteen  years  there  has  been  in 
Edinburgh  a  "  Spanish  Evangelization 
Society,"  which,  notwithstanding  tho 
cruel  laws  of  ti.e  kingdom  against  Prot- 
estants, succeeded  in  maintaining  a  num- 
ber of  agents  in  Spain,  who  circulated 
the  Bible  and  rel  gi  isl  !.-.  and  worked 
efficiently  for  the  dissemination  of  Prot- 
estant principles.  This  Society  has  been 
very  active  since  the  beginning  of  the 
new  era.  In  .March  it  supported  about 
twelve  agents,  three  of  whom  were  men 
of  superior  education,  well-tried  Chris- 
tian character,  and  good  ministerial 
gifts.  In  Seville,  the  capital  of  Andalu- 
sia, and  the  second  city  of  Spain,  there 
were  two  evangelists  —  the  Rev.  Juan 
B.  Cabrera,  and  the  Rev.  Antonio  S. 
Soler.  The  Protestant  population  of  this 
city  alone  amounts  to  ful !y  4,000,  A  neat, 
comfortable,  and  suitable  place  for  wor- 
ship has  i  a  0]  a  I  at  the  expense  of 
the  Evangelization  Society,  but  it  is  by 
far  too  small.  It  is  thought  that  if  Se- 
ville had  from  four  to  six  churches  they 
would  all  be  well  fill*  I.  The  congrega- 
tion of  Cabrera  consists  for  the  i  i  - 
part  of  workii  1  their  wives. 

On  the  evening  of  Good  Friday  tho  Lord's 
Supper  was  administered  to  about  one 
hundred  an  t  fifty  communicants. 

Protestant  chapel  in  Madrid  was 
opened  on  the  21st  of  March,  1*.  can 
seat  about  nine  huudred  persons,  and  it 
is  always  largely  attended.  Tho  con- 
gregation is  fully  organized  and  consti- 
tuted. On  Paster  Sunday  fifty 
iaids  received  the  communion,  this,  being 


I  the  first  time  that  the  Lord's  Supper  was 
,  thus  administered  in  the  Spanish  <■■ 
;  The  congregations  in  Barcelona,  M 
and  several  other  cities  are  also  consti- 
tuted.    The  number  of  places  in  \ 
evangelical    worship    has    occasionally 
be  m  celebrated  is  very  large.     In  i 
places  as  many  as  cue  or  two  tho 
people  were  present,  and  listened  to  ti.e 
new  doctrines  with  interest  and  atten- 
tion, 

The   circulation   of  the  Bible  and   of 
religious  tracts  has  been  carried  on  with 
great,    energy    and    success.      An 
meats  were  early  made  by  the  religious 
societies   of  foreign    countries   to    La'.. 
Bibles  and   tracts  printed  in  Spain,  and 
the  eagerness  of  the  people  to  receive, 
and  even  to  buy,  the  hitherto  prol 
books  was  marvelous.     Prom  the  B 
stand  in  Madrid  more  than  100.COO  Gos- 
pels and  Epistles  parsed  into  the  hands 
of  the   people.     The    tracts,   printed    in 
Madrid  lor  the  Religious   Tract  fc 
of  London  number  about  500,000.    F 
of  the  forty-nine  provinces  has  now  vol- 
untary agents,  who  aid  in  the  distril  u- 
tiou  of  Bibles  and  tracts.     They  are  men 
of   all  professions — medical   men,    mer- 
chants, shopkeepers,   clerks,  and  mi  ny 
of  ihum  report  gr«.-at  successes, 

ROMAff  CATHOLICISM. 
Tin:  Comikg  Council— Thk  Omextal 
and  the  Protestakt  Churches —  The 
State    Governments  —  Progress    of 
Preparations. — liver  since  lh(    ; 
cation  of  the  Pope's  Bull  convoking   I 
(Ecumenical  Council,  and  of  his  let 
invitation  to  the  Oriental  Bishops  and  the 
Protestant   Churchi  b,    the  prepari 
for  the  Couueil  have  made  unintei  i 
progress.     The  Jesuits  in  Rome  have 

shed  a  periodical  specially  di  ■ 
to   giving   information    concerning    the 
coming  Council,  entitled   "  I  hi 
Matters  relating  to  the  Future  Council," 
and  similar  periodicals  haw  1  eeo  ■ 
Ushed  in  Germany  and  France,    It  may 
naturally  be  supposed  that  these  p  i 
cola  publish  nearly  all  the  trustwi 
information  that  can  be  obtained  i 

uncil,  and  the  s.  nsalional  reports 
of  the  Roman  coi  Jitical 

papers  must  be  n  ci  ived  «  itl 
trust    The  prcparaii<  ns  an  i 
tho  chief  direction  of  a  Spoci 
lion   of  seven    I     .  They  are   all 

Italians  with  the  exception  of  one,  Car- 
dinal do  Keisach,  who  is  a  German,  aud 


1869.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


439 


was  formerly  Archbishop  of  Munich.  To 
them  are  added  seven  Consullors,  four  of 
whom  ^re  Italians,  one,  Mgr.  Talbot,  an 
Englishman;  one,  Professor  Feije,  of  the 
University  of  Louvain,  a  Belgian;  and 
one,  Professor  Hefele,  of  the  University 
of  Tubingen,  a  German.  The  last  named 
has  the  greatest  reputation  among  the 
members  for  scholarship.  He  is  the 
author  of  the  best  work  that  has  ever 
been  written  on  the  History  of  the  Coun- 
cils, and  is  generally  esteemed,  by  both 
Roman  Catholics  and  Protestants,  as  one 
of  the  best  Church  historians  of  Germany. 
Special  Commissions  have  been  appoint- 
ed for  ceremonies,  for  politico-ecclesiasti- 
cal affairs,  for  the  Pastern  Churches,  on 
religious  orders  and  congregations,  on 
questions  of  dogmatic  theology,  and  on 
points  of  ecclesiastical  discipline.  There 
are  in  all  these  commissions  more 
members  from  Italy  than  from  any  other 
country.  Hardly  one  of  them  is  known 
outside  of  his  Church,  or  even  outside  of 
Italy.  The  scholarship  of  Catholic  Ger- 
many has  received  some  recognition  by 
the  appointment  of  the  next  largest  num- 
ber of  commissioners  from  Germany. 
Some  of  them  are  authors  of  works  whose 
scholarship  is  cheerfully  acknowledged 
in  Protestant  literature  ;  as  Dr.  Alzog, 
the  author  of  the  best  Roman  Catholic 
Church  History  and  of  a  Manual  of  Pa- 
trology;  Dr.  Hergeuroether.  the  author  of 
the  great  work  on  the  Patriarch  Photius, 
and  the  Separation  of  the  Latin  and  Greek- 
Churches.  Dr.  Hefele  has  already  been 
mentioned.  Dr.  Dollinger,  probably  the 
greatest  living  Roman  Catholic  theologian 
of  Germany,  has  also  been  invited,  al- 
though he  is  decidedly  disliked  in  Rome 
on  account  of  the  liberal  views  he  hi 'Ms 
on  several  questions.  He  has  declined 
the  invitation,  and  report  credits  him' 
with  the  authorship  of  several  articles  on 
the  Council  in  the'" Augsburg  Gazette," 
which  have  been  very  unfavorably  re- 
ceived in  Rome.  Dr.  Newman,  in  En- 
gland, has  also  declined  an  invitation  on 
account  of  his  infirm  health. 

The  principal  architects  of  Rome  havo 
begun  to  prepare  one  of  the  large  chap- 
els of  St  Peter's  Chnrcb,  which  is  capable 
of  containing  several  thousand  , 
for  tho  sessions  of  the  Council.  The 
altar  of  the  Council  is  at  one  end  of  the 
chapel,  the  throne  of  the  Popeal  the  op- 
posite end.  On  the  right  and  left  of  the 
throne  are  placed  the  seats  of  the  Cardi- 
nals, Patriarchs,  and  Embassadors  of 
Sovereigns.     The  seaifl  of  the  Prelates 


are  arranged  in  two  semicircles,  each 
tier  being  elevated  above  the  one  before 
it;  the  tribune  of  tho  orators  is  placed  in 
ti:  •  middle  of  the  open  space  between; 
and  there  are  also  tribunes  prepared  for 
those  who  will  be  admitted  as  .spectators 
of  the  public  sessions. 

The  invitations  sent  to  the  Bishops  of 
the  Greek  Church  promise  no  re 
The  emphatic  refi  i  1  of  tli  Patriarch  of 
Constantinople  and  the  Emperor  of  Rus- 
sia to  comply  with  the  invitation,  would 
alone  be  sufficient  to  decide  the  course 

.  reat  majority  of  the  Bishops.  A 
few  instances  are  cited  of  Bishops  who 
received  the  letter  with  respect.  Thus 
the  Bishop  of  Trebizond  is  said  to  have 
raised  it  to  his  forehead  and  pressed  ii 
to  his  bosom,  exclaiming  with  emotion, 
:'  0  Rome!  0  Rome!  0  St.  Peter!  0  St. 
Peter! :!  The  Bishop  of  Adrianople  re- 
turned the  letter,  saying,  "I  wish  first  to 
reflect.  I  wish  to  decide  for  myself/' 
But  not  one  Greek  bishop,  it  seem 
thus  far  signified  his  intention  to  be 
present,  and  the  expectation  of  some 
org  ins  of  Rome  that  probably  about  a 
hundred  Oriental  Bishops  would  attend  is 
certain  to  be  doomed  to  disappointment 
Tho  interview  between  th«  Papal  C  m- 
missioners  and  the  Greek  Patriarch  elect 
of  Alexandria  is  of  special  interest,  as 
the  ai  juments  of  the  Patriarch  explain 
more  fi  My  than  any  other  reply  from  the 
Eastern  Bishops  which  we  have 
yet,  the  present  .relations  of  the  Greek  to 
the  Roman  Catholic  Church.  Resides 
numerous  others,  the  Patriarch  Btated  in 
bis  conversation  with  the  Papal  embas- 
there  are  particularly  three  ee>n- 

ti  ius  which  render  the  ace. 
of  tho  Papal  brief  by  the  Greek  Bishops 
an  nil;  o  sibility.     In  the  first  plac  . 

:  old  Rome,  though  merely  tho  oc- 
cupant of  one  of  the  ancient  Patriarchal 
□d  a  peer  onlyol  the  either  Patri- 
archs, claims  a  sovereign  d  iminion  over 
all  tho  others.  The  (Ecumenical  Councils 
ancient  Church  conceded  to  him 
the  honor  of  and  he 

irefore,   no   right   to   convoke   a 
General  Council  witl  nt  of 

the  otbor  Patriarcha  The  proper  way 
for  a  F  ce  a  Council  which 

win. Id  I  i!  in  t.io  eyes  ■ 

Greek  Church,  also,  would  be  to  i 
tho  pr.  vious  consont  and  co-op  ral 

ndly,  the  Pa- 
triarch objects  to  tho  Pope  teaching 
aalvation  is  ezclusivoly  found  in  tiu  • 
inunion  of  Rome,  whereas,  according  to 


4-10 


Foreign  Religion*  Intelligence. 


[July, 


the  Patriarch,  the  grace  of  God  has 
operated  throughout  the  habitable  globe. 
In  the  third  place,  the  Patriarch  remarks 
that  the  "Festival  of  the  Immaculate 
Conception  of  the  Mother  of  the  Lord," 
on  which  the  Council  convoked  by  the 
Pope  is  to  meet,  is  ono  wholly  unknown 
to  the  ancient  Church,  a  recent  invention 
of  the  Church  of  Pome,  and  by  no  means 
a  solitary  one.  In  conclusion,  the  Patri- 
arch advises  the  Pope,  in  case  he  sin- 
cerely desires  the  unity  of  the  universal 
Church,  that  ho  should  write  to  the  Pa- 
triarchs individually,  and  acting  in  con- 
cert, endeavor  to  come  to  an  understand- 
ing with  them  respecting  the  course  to 
be  adopted:  renouncing  every  idea  of 
domination  and  every  dogma  on  which 
opinions  may  clash  in  the  Church.  By 
so  doing  his  efforts  might  perchance  be 
crowned  with  some  degree  of  success. 

It  is,  however,  probable  that  a  few 
Bishops  of  the  smaller  Oriental  Churches, 
may  be  induced  to  be  present.  The 
Armenian  Patriarch  of  Constantinople, 
who  at  first  referred  the  Papal  Com- 
missioners to  the  Catholicus  of  Etscbmi- 
adsin,  the  first  Bishop  of  the  Armenian 
Church,  seems  subsecpiently  to  have 
been  gained  over,  together  with  a  num- 
ber of  other  Bishops.  But  the  great 
majority  of  the  Armenian  population  does 
not  want  to  hear  any  thing  about,  trans- 
actions with  Pome,  and  so  earnestly  re- 
monstrated against  his  course  that  the 
Patriarch  was  forced  to  resign.  The 
Coptic  Patriarch  of  Alexandria  is  said  to 
have  received  the  Encyclical  with  great 
respect  and  many  expressions  of  courtesy 
toward  the  Prelate  who  was  its  bearer. 

The  attendance,  then,  will  be  almost 
limited  to  those  who  are  entitled  to  a  scat 
by  the  Church  law  of  Rome  This  class 
embraces  the  Bishops,  the  Cardinals, 
Abbot-,  and  Generals  of  religious  orders. 
The  Bishops  are  entitled  to  a  seat  by 
divine  right,  the  others  by  ecclesiastical 
law  or  privilege.  The  number  of  Bishops 
is  considerable,  and  it  has  of  file  rapidly 
increased.  The  "Annuario  Pontiticio" 
(official  Paper  Almanac)  for  1868  gives 
the  folio?  ing  summary  of  the  dioceses  of 
the  Roman  Catholic  Church: 

Patriaechates. 

Of  the  Latin  Bite  and   the  Oriental 
Rite 12 

AiiCHCisuonucs. 
Latin  Kit,: 

Immediately  subject  to  the  Pope 12 

With  Ecclesiastical  Provinces 120 


Greco 

.Ale 

chite 

Greco 

-Roumanian 

Greco 

Ku 

heman 

Greco 
Svri.i- 

-Bu 

.".nan 

Oriental  Bite. 
With  Ecclesiastical  Provinces. 

Armenian  Bite 1 

Greco-Roumanian  Kite 1 

Greco-Ruthenian  Kite l 

Dependent  on  Oriental  Patriarchs. 

Grcco-Melchite  Bite S 

Syro-Maronite  Kite 1 

Total  Archbishopric? 189 

Bisnorincs. 
Latin  Site. 
Suburban  (the  Sees  of  the  Cardinal 

Bishops) 6 

Immediately  subject  to  the  Pope 64 

Suffragans  in  Ecclesiastical  Provinces  5G1 

Oriental  Bite. 

Armenian 16 


Syro-Chaldaic 12 

Syro-Maronite 7 

Total  Bishoprics 714 

Total   Patriarchates,  Archbishop- 
rics, and  Bishoprics 805 

Of  these  dioceses  about  100  are  usually 
vacant,  leaving  the  number  of  Bishops 
who  have  actually  been  -invited  by  the 
Pope  about  750.  There  arc,  besides, 
about  230  titular  Bishops,  who  are  not  at 
the  head  of  the  idoeese,  but  are  cither 
coadjutors  of  diocesan  Bishops,  or  vicars 
apostolic,  delegates  apostolic,  or  prefects 
apostolic.  The  question  of  the  ri 
these  Bishops  to  a  seat  was,  according  to 
the  latest  advices,  still  under  considera- 
tion. The  number  of  dioceses  has  received 
a  considerable  increase  by  the  present 
Popo,  who  has  erected  G  archbishoprics 
and  112  bishoprics.  The  increase  has 
b  i  n  |  reater  in  the  countries  of  America 
than  in  any  of  the  countries  of  the  Old 
Wei  hi,  and  at  the  beginning  of  the  pres- 
ent year  the  number  of  Ami  i 
already  amounted  to  152,  or  more  than 
one  sixth  of  the  total  number  of  dii 

The  number  of  Cardinals,  who  are  oot 
at  the  same  time  Bishops,  ij  about  25. 
Of  Gonorals,  or  Superiors  of  Monastic 
Orders,   most  of  who! 
the   Papal   Almanac  m  it  50. 

fmiton  i  Lbboi  is  nlso  con- 
siderable. As  all  those  who  are  entitled 
to  a  seat  Me  net  only  invited,  but  com- 
i  to  come,  the  number  of  absen- 
tees will  be  comparatively  small,  and  the 
il  >ly  will  number  probably  from  S00 
to  900  members. 


1869.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


441 


In  Holland  there  has  been  for  over  1  JO 
years  a  small  sect  called  the  Jansenists, 
•who  consider  themselves  as  Roman  Cath- 
olics, though  they  are  unrecognized  and 
excommunicated  by  the  Poj  o.  They  are 
the  followers  of  Bishop  Jansenius,  whose 
work  on  Grace  was,  after  Lis  death,  con- 
demned by  the  Pope,  a  sentence  which 
called  forth  a  great  commotion  in  the 
Churches  of  France  and  the  Netherlands, 
the  friends  of  Jansenius  maintaining  that 
the  book  of  Jansenius  hr;d  been  misunder- 
stood at  Rome,  and  appealing  from  the 
decision  of  the  Pope,  whose  infallibility 
they  denied,  to  the  supreme  authority  of 
an  (Ecumenical  Council.  They  have  one 
Archbishop  and  two  Bishops,  all  in  Hol- 
land, who  probably  will  go  to  Homo,  and, 
submitting  to  the  Council  will  b<.>  re- 
united with  the  Church.  The  entire 
popula-ion  connected  with  this  sect  is 
about  8.000.  The  Protestant  world  has, 
on  the  whole,  taken  but  little  notice  of 
the  Council.  A  few  Churches  and  cor- 
porations have  published,  in  reply  to 
the  Papal  letter  inviting  the  Protestants 
to  return  to  the  Roman  Catholic  Church, 


declarations  or  letters  restating  the  fun- 
damental differences  which  separate  Prot- 
estants in  general,  and  the  Church  which 
they    specially    represent,    from    2: 
Other  Churches,  as  the  Old  and  New  Scho  1 
Presbyterians,  have  recently  resolved  to 
do  tin'  same  thing.     That  portion  i 
English  Ritualists  whose  great  aim  is 
the  reunion  between  the  Church  o 
gland  and  Rome,  still  talk  of  &  uding 
representatives  to  Route  to  negoti  ite  :'  r 
terms  of  submission.     On!  idc    of  that 
party  there  are  only  a  few  isolated  m 
the  Protestant  world  who  think  tl 
Council  may  aid  in  healing  (he  divis    ns 
of  Christendom,  and  in  preparing   the 
day  when  ail  the  believers  in  the   Lord 
Jesus  Christ  will  agree  in  the!  - 
articles  of  faith.     G-uizot  has  ex; :    --    l 
himself  in  this  sense,  and  in  Germany  a 
lev.'  Protestant  writers   have   advanced 
similar  views;   but  on -the   Protestant 
world   in   general  the  Papal  letter  and 
j  the  procei  dings  of  the  Council  will  "nave 
as  little  effect  as  a  General  Assembly  of 
|  Mohammedans  or  Hindoos  would  pro- 
i  duce. 


Art.  IX.— FOREIGN    LITERARY  INTELLIGENCE. 


GERMANY. 

The  great  work  of  Calvin,  the  Insti- 
tutes of  the  Christian  Religion,  has  been 
published  as  a  part  of  the  new  edition  of 
the  complete  works  of  Calvin  v.  hicL 
appears  tinder  the  editorship  of  Drs. 
Baum.  Cuuitz,  and  Reuss,  three  profe  s- 
ors  of  the  Seminary  of  Btrasburg.  It 
is  also  sold  separately.  This  is  by  far 
the  best  edition  of  the  Works  of  the  reat 
reformer  win  h  has  yet  appeared.  (//*- 
stitutio  /.'  -  ij  '  its  Christiana.  2  vols. 
Brunswick.  1869.) 

The  popular  lectures  by  Professor  Ha- 
genbach  on  Church  History,  which  w<  re 
rirs:  pu  li       L in  s       ral  i  liti  ns,  indc- 
i    ndent  of  each  other,  have  no  • 
united  by  tl  e  author  into  one  worl 
Kirchi 

mm    19   Jahrh  ■'.       Leipsic,     L8G9.) 

The  whole  work,  in  il  -  pn  jcuI  lb 
form  five  volumi  i.     Tli  ■  fi         ontaintug 
the  history  of  the  first  sis  cod  tin        lia 
recently  been  published.     The  lectures 
on  recent  Church  hi  story,  of  v  I 
English    translation    has  just    been  an- 


nounced by  Dr.  Hurst,  arc  part  of  this 
work. 

Sebastian  Pranck,  one  of  the  noblest 
and  most  prominent  representatives  of 
the  enthusiasts  and  separatists,  whom 
Luther  d  (signal  d  by  the  name  of 
been  made  the  sub- 
ject  of  a  leam<  d  ni  in  .-mm  by  Carl 
Alfred  Llase,  a  son  of  the  well-known 
historian.  {Sebastian  Frai  It 
•  ■ 

The  •  -  :,:  d  of  Po  th  in       S  rmons  of 
Ricliard  Rotlio  is  now  completed  by  the 
appi  arancc  of  the  third  a 
has  been    published   by  J.   Bleek.     The 

Dr.     Sch  >nkcl.      {/.' 
Pr   'i'jten.    Ell 
An  autobiography  has  bei  n  ]  ul 
i  pulpit  orator 
!  rich  Williehn  Krum  . 
|  December  10,  L8G8.     The  ti 
j  many  o:    bis   works   into   tho    English, 

Dutch,    and    other    langi 
had  made  tho  name  of  Kniramacher  well 
!  known  throughout  tho  world. 


442 


Foreign  Literary  Intelligence. 


[July, 


Ono  of  the  standard  works  of  the 
evangelical  school  of  German  theology, 
Dr.  Ebrard'a  WtssensclwftHsclie  Kritikder 
Evangelischen  Geschichte,  Las  been  pub- 
lished in  a  third  edition.  (Frankfort.  1 S69.) 
The  author  gives  iu  this  new  edition  a 
full  review  of  the  whole  recent  literature 
on  the  Gospel  history. 

Among  the  most  important  of  ihc 
recent  theological  publications  of  Ger- 
many belongs,  according  to  the  opinion 
of  all  schools,  the  History  of  the  Old 
Testament  in  the  Christian  Church,  by 
Dr.  Diestel.  professor  in  Jena.  (Geschichte 
des  Alien  Testamentcs.  Jena,  1869.)  The 
object  of  the  author  is  not  only  to  give 
a  history  of  the  interpretation  of  the  Old 
Testament,  but  also  a  review  of  the  the- 
ological views  concerning  the  Old  Testa- 
ment in  the  several  periods  of  the 
Christian  Church,  of  its  influences  upon 
the  life,  constitution,  worship,  and  doc- 
trine of  the  Church,  as  well  as  of  the  use 
made  of  Old  Testament  subjects  in  art 
and  the  application  of  Old  Testament  pre- 


cedents in  law.  The  book  is  divided  into 
seven  periods,  namely  :  1.  The  times  oi 
the  Fathers,  from  100  to  250,  A.  D.  (The 
Old  Testament  in  the  Apostolic  Church  is 
only  briefly  treated  of  ia  the  preface.) 
2.  The  time  of  the  great  Chui 
250-600.  3.  Theological  science  as  pupil 
of  the  fathers,  600-1100.  -1.  The  times 
of  Church  power,  1100-1517.  5.  The 
Ref  rmation,  1511-1600.  6.  Tlie  i 
opposing  systems  under  the  predominance 
of  orthodox}-.  1600-1750.  7.  The  conflict 
and  reconciliation  of  the  opposing  sys- 
tems, 1750  to  the  present  day.  No 
work  of  so  comprehensive  a  character 
has  ever  been  published,  and  the  schol- 
arship and  accuracy  of  the  author 
meets  with  general  approbation. 

Among  the  last  publications  of  the 
"Rough  House,"  in  Hamburg,  we  find 
one,  a  German  translation  of  a  work  by 
a  distinguished  Danish  theologian,  Dr. 
Kalkar,  on  the  history  of  the  conversions 
from  Judaism  to  Christianity.  (L 
die  Kvrche.  Hamburg.  1SG9.) 


Ar.T.  X.— SYNOPSIS  OF  THE  QUARTERLIES,  AND  OTIIERS  OF 
TflE  HIGHER  PERIODICALS. 


American  Quarterly  Reviews. 


AMERICAS  PresbytERIax  Review,  April,  1869.  (New  York.) —  1.  Recent  Dis- 
coveries in  Geology.  2.  The  Reformed  or  Calvinistic  Sens-.  3.  Biblical  Preach- 
ing. 4.  President  Wbeelock  and  Ins  Contemporaries.  5.  Progress  of  the 
Reunion  Movement.  6.  The  Incarnation,  and  the  System  which  Stauds  upon 
It.     7.  Mr.  Mill  and  his  Critics.     8.  An  "  Old  Side"  Plea  fur  Reunion. 

Baptist  Quarterly,    April,  180C*.     (Philadelphia.)— 1.   Dale's  Classic   Baptism. 

2.  The  Causal  Judgment.     3.    [nfant    Baptism   aa    Invention  of  Men. 

Great  Pyramid  of  Gizch.     5.  The  Tubingen  Sch  k>L     C>.  Exegetical  Studies. 
Biblical  Repertory  and  Prixcetox  Review,  April.  1S69.    (New  York.) — 1.  The 

Calvinistic  Methodists  in  Wall    .    2.  S  >me  Recent  Discussions  on  the  Funda 

Principles  of  Morals.     ::.  Planting  of  the  American  Churches.     I.  The  Novel 

and  Novel  Reading.     5.    Ethics 

6.  Froude's  History  of  En  I  nd.     7.  Tli    I  shment  of  the  Irish  Church. 

S.  Recent  Developments  resp    iting  Presbyterian  Reunion. 
Bibliotqeca  Sacra,  April,  1S69.     (Andover.) — 1.  The  Origin  of  the  Fir.-' 

Gospels.     2.   Jonathan  Edwards.     3.   The  Authority  of  Faith.     ■'■■■   'I 

Parker  and  Adoniram  J  udson.    5.  The  Doctrine  of  God's  Providence,    o.  !. 

tion  and  Inspiration. 
Christian  Quarterly,  April,  1860.    (Cincinnati.)— 1.  Galileo  and   the  Church. 

2.  Phases  of  Religion  in   the  United  States.    3.  The  Glories  of  Mary.    -t.  The 

Royal  Priesthood.      6.    Christology.     G.   The    Kingdom  of  God.     7.  I 

Officers. 


1SG9.1  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies.  44-3 

Evangelical  Quarterly  Review,  April,  1SG9.  (Gottysburgh.) — 1.  Death  and  the 
Intermediate  State.     2.  True  Faith:  Its  Nature  and  Efficacy.     3. The  Meaning 
of  the    Word    Selah.    -1.  The   Good   Angels.     5.   How  shall   we    Order   our 
Worship?     C.    Lutheranism    before    Luther.     7.  The   Key's.     8.   Sermonizing. 
y.  Sprague's  Annals  of  the  American  Lutheran  Pnlpit. 
Mercersbubg  Review,  April,   1869.    (Philadelphia.)— I.  Nominalism  and  Real- 
ism.    2.  Luther's    Translation  of  the  Holy  Scriptures;  The    New  Testament. 
3.  The  Christologic  Problem.    -1.  Reply  to  Dr.  Dornor's  Criticism  on   "Mercers- 
burg  and  Modern  Theology  Compared."     5.  The  Catholic    Church  Movement. 
6.  '"The  Wisdom  of  God  in  a  -Mystery."     7.  Preaching.     S.  The  Unity  of  the 
Apostles'  Creed. 
New  Ekglasder,  April.  18G9.     (New  Haven.)— 1.  The  Ran  Kiau,  or  the  Three  Re- 
ligions of  China.    2.  False  Definitions  of  Faith,  and  the  True  Definition,     'i.  Yale 
College,  and  the  Late  Meeting  of  the  Alumni  in  New  York.     -I.  Spain,  aud  the 
Late  Revolution,  by  an  Eye-witness  in  the  Winter  of  18G8-9.     5.  The  American 
Colleges  and  the  American  Public.     G.  Princeton  Exegesis,  No.  II.— Its  Dealing 
with  the  Testimony  of  the  Scriptures  against  the  Doctrine  of  a  Limited  Atonement. 
Universalis!  Quarterly,  April,  1869.    (Boston.)— 1.  The  Dogmatic  Use  of  Old 
Testament  Passages  in  the  New  Testament j  and  their  Importance  as  Binding 
upon   the    Christian   Expositor,  with   especial   Reference  to  Hebrews   i,  o-13. 
2.  The  Origin  of  Sin.     3.  Ancient  Babylonian  Literature,     -i.  The  Development 
of  Protestantism.     5.  The  Fullness  of  Christ.     6.  Our  Nation,  and  Statesman- 
ship.    7.  The  Mission  of  Christ. 
North    American-    Review,    April,    1SC9.     (Boston.)— 1.   Cotton  Mather  and 
Salem    Witchcraft,       2.    The    Talmud.       3.    The    "Seven    Cities    of    Cibola." 
4.  The  Sanitary  and  Physiological    Relations  of  Tobacco.      5.  The  Financial 
Condition  of  the  United  States."   0.  The  Spanish  Revolution.     7.  Earthquakes. 
Mr.  Poole,    in   the    first    article,   rescues   the    name    of   Cotton 
Mather  from  the  imputation  of  leading  the  witchcraft  excitement 
in  New  England.     Indeed,  he  shows  that  the  most  responsible 
parties  were  not  the  clergy  but  the  judges;  not  the  theology  hut 
the  law.     Would  not  a  fair  allowance  for  the  really  inexplicable 
character  of  some   of  the  phenomena  justify,  generally,  a  less 
severe  tone  of  history  on  the  whole  affair? 


English  Reviews. 


British  and  Foreign  Evangelical  Review,  April,  1869.  (London.)— l.  Chris- 
tian Female  Authorship.  2.  Modern  Judaism.  3.  The  Procession  of  the  Holy 
Spirit  from  the  Son.     -1.  The  Antiquitj  of  Man.     5.  Romeward  i 

■■    the  Day.     6.  Scottish  Prelacy  after  tho  Restoration.  » '  •  * 

Church.    8.  The  Royal  Supremacy  and  Religio 


arnsa  Quarterly  Review,  April,   18C9.    (London.)— 1.  The  Works  of  Mrs. 
Oliphant      2.    Royal  C  »mrois  lion    on  tho    I  aw  i  ol    M  irrin  -.     3,   R 
Five  Great  Monarchies,     -l.  Roman  Catholicism  in  Prance.     5.  Po  ticnl  Works 
t  Browning.     6.  The   Irish  Church  in  the  Sixteenth  Century.     1.  Pau- 
8.  The  Brahmo  Somaj  of  India.    9.  Rcsull  ofthe  Irish  Chun  h  l1  •'  at 
Review,    April,    1869.      (New    York:    Reprint.)-— 1.    «' 
Funci      3    Tho   Competitive   Industry    of  Katio         '■-  '■'■ 
do   Lafayette.      5.  The   Sett!  ment  of  Ulster.      CD 
7    Matthow    Arnold's  Critical   Works.     8.  American  Finance,   IS65- 


of  Robert  Browning.     6.  The  Irish  Church  in  the  Sixteenth  Century.     1 
perism,    8.  The  Brahmo  Somaj  of  India.     9.  Rcsull  ofthe  Irish  I  burch  D 
Edinburgh    Review,    April,    1869.      (Sew    York:    Reprint.)— 1.  J 
2.  Edible 
Madame 

Britain.     7.  Mattlu 

1869.    9.  Lifi  aud  Times  of  Edward  III.    10.  Campbell's  Lives  oi  Lyn 
and  Brougham. 


-M4  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and  [July, 

Lqxdos  Quarterly  Review,  April,  1869.    (New  York:  Reprint.)— 1.  Rassain's 

Abyssinia.     2.  Modern  English  Poets.     ?.  Geological  Climates  and  the  Origin  of 
Species.    4.  Cost  of  Party  Government.     5.  Dante  Alighieri.     6.  Female  Ei   ica- 
tion.     7.  Travels  in  Greece.     S.  The  Religious  "Wars  of  France.     9.  Aim;  of 
Modern  Medicin  •.     10.  Irish  Chuvcli  BiE 
North  British  Review,  March,  1869.     (New  York:  Reprint)— 1.    The   Royal 
Engineers.     2.  Russian  Literature — Turguenief's  Novels.     3.  Revolution    i 
Queen's  English.     1.  Dean  Milraan.     :>.  The  Increase  of  Lunacy.     6.  Tip 
son's  Bay  Company.     7.  Whatis  Man's  Chief  End  2     8.  Public  "Works  in  ) 
9.  The  Reconstruction  of  Germany. 


German  Reviews. 

Theoxogische  Si  gdiex  uxd  KRiTBCEy.   (Theological  Essays  and  Reviews.)    Tliird 
Number.     1S69. — Essays.     1.  Achelis,   Dr.  Richard  Rothe.     2.  DlETSCH,  Th 
Doctrines  of  the  Inspiration  of  the  Scriptures.     3.  Klopeer,  The  Meaning 
the  Object  of  Rom.  v,  12-21.     Thoughts  and  Remarks.     1.  Burkhaedt,  On  the 
Credibility  of  the    Reply  of  Luther:  "Here  I  stand;  I  cannot  otl 
help  me,  Amen."     2.  Guaf,  Tho  Accounts  of  the  Four  Gospels  on  the  Resur- 
rection of  Jesus.     Reviews:  1.  Walters,  Conrad  von  Heresbach,  and  the  His- 
tory of  the  Reformati  m  of  the  City  of  Wesel;  reviewed  byWiLKixs.     2.  Piper, 
Introduction   into   Monumental  Theology;  reviewed  by  Geuseisek.     o.  Peiss, 
Apology  of  Faith ;  reviewed  by  Baxsiann. 

Richard  Rothe  is  so  eminent  among  the  theological  writers  of  the 
present  century  that  we  cannot  be  surprised  at  the  large  number 
of  biographical  sketches  which  are  published  of  him.  Among 
the  fullest  and  best  accounts  of  Ins  life  and  Lis  works  art- 
counted  those  published  by  Schekel  in  the  Allgemcine  Kirch- 
liche  Zeitschrift,  (1867,  numbers  0  and  10,)  and  in  the  preface 
to  his  edition  of  Rothc's  Posthumous  Sermons,  (Nachgelcu 
IWdif/'ai,  vol.  i,)  by  Dr.  Nippold,  Professor  at  the  University  of 
Heidelberg,  in  Gelzer's  Monat&hefte^  18GS,  and  in  particular  that 
by  Hbnig,  Suddcutschcs  protest.  WocJicnblutt,  I8u7.  The  article 
in  tliis  number  of  the  Studien,  by  Achelis,  will  take  its  rank 
among  the  best.  In  four  sections  it  treats  of  Rothc's  life,  of  In- 
religious  and  moral  character,  of  his  eminence  as  a  pulpit  orator 
and  scientific  theologian,  and  of  his  relation  to  the  ecclesiastical 
parlies.  Rothe  occupies  a  peculiar  position  in  the  history  of  the 
German  Protestanl  Church.  In  the  great  literary  controversy 
between  the  believers  in  the  supernatural  origin  of  Christianity 
and  the  special  inspiration  «>f  the  Bible  on  the  one  hand,  and  the 
Rationalists  on  the  other,  Rothe  stood  very  emphatically  on  the 
side  of  the  former;  and  evangelical  theologians  unanimously  class 
his  great  work  on  Elhiks  (I'/teolog.  Ethik,  3  vols.,  1846-1848, 
second  edition,  volumes  i  and  ii,  1867)  among  the  standard  works 
of  recent  Protestant  theological  literature,  lie  had,  however, 
many  peculiar  views.     He  himself,  to  designate  his  theological 


I860.]  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  445 

stand-point  claimed  the  name  of  a  Christian  thcosophist,  and 
professed  to  be  a  follower  of  Jacob  Bcelrni  and  of  Oettinger. 
The  author  of  this  sketch  in  the  Studien  remarks  that  Uothc  was 
the  first  to  raise  theosophy  to  the  rank  of  a  science,  and  that  by 
his  method  of  theological  speculation  he  rendered  the  greatest 
sendees  to  theology.  Rothe  (in  his  work,  Anfange  der  Christ- 
lichen  Kirclui  und  Hirer  Verfassung,  and  again  in  his  Theolo'g. 
JEthifr)  developed  an  entirely  new  theory  of  the  Church.  He 
viewed  it  as  an  exclusively  religious  communion  as  distinguished 
from  the  several  moral  communities,  the  totality  of  which,  accord- 
ing to  him,  is  the  State.  The  Church,  as  an  abstractly  religious 
communion,  can  never,  according  to  Rothe,  completely  realize  its 
own  idea ;  as  a  separate  organization  it  is  the  less  needed  the 
more  the  moral  development  of  the  State  advances,  until  finally 
it  will  be  entirely  superseded,  and  the  State  become  the  kingdom  of 
God.  Rothe  had  a  profound  appreciation  and  admiration  of  the 
progress  of  modern  civilization,  and  had  the  firmest  conviction 
that  as  this  civilization  was  an  outgrowth  of  Christianity,  it  could 
and  should  be  fully  harmonized  with  the  fundamental  doctrines  of 
Christianity.  He  deplored  the  course  which  the  great  majority  of 
the  orthodox  Churches  of  Germany  are  pursuing  with  regard  to  the 
progressive  tendencies  of  the  age,  and,  therefore,  resolved  to  co- 
operate with  the  Protestant  Union,"  (Protestanten  Verein,)  which 
demands  the  abolition  of  the  influence  of  the  State  governments 
upon  the  Church  and  the  reconstruction  of  the  Church  upon  a 
popular  basis.  Most  of  the  leaders  of  this  association  arc  Nation- 
alists, but  Rothe  believed  that  the  change  of  ecclesiastical  con- 
stitution advocated  by  them  was  a  step  in  the  righl  direction.  The 
author  of  this  biographical  sketch,  an  euthusiastical  admirer  of  the 
piety  and  the  character  of  Rothe,  believes  that' in  expecting  any 
good  to  come  from  an  association  controlled  by  Rationalistic 
leaders,  Rothe  was  radically  mistaken. 

In  the  little  article  on  the  famous  saying  of  Luther  at  the  Diet 
of  Worms,  (Here  I  stand ;  I  cannot  otherwise;  God  help  me, 
Amen,)  Dr.  Burkhardt,  a  writer  already  favorably  known  by 
several  writings  on  Luther,  undertakes  to  prove,  from  a  carefnl 
comparison  of  ad  the  original  documents,  that  those  words  do 
probably  not  contain  the  real  answer  of  Luther,  but  thai  the 
first  hah'  is  a  later  addition. 

The  next  article,  by  Graf,  has  for  ils  object  to  prove,  against 
the  attacks  of  Dr.  Strauss,  the  entire  harmony  of  the  accounts 
of  the  four  Gospels  relative  to  the  sending  of  the  Apostles  to 
Galilee  after  the  resurrection  of  Christ. 


446  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and  [July, 

Zj;iTScnim-T  pub  Historischb  Theologie.  (Journal  for  Historical  Theology.) 
18G9.  Second  Number.— 2.  Elemme,  Life  and  Writings  of  Johann  Yennhardt. 
3.  Foerster,  Johann  Forster;  a  Life  Picture  of  the  Time  of  the  Reformation. 
A.  Herzog,  Fenelon,  Archbishop  of  Cambray.  b.  Linder,  The  Reformed 
Church  of  Switzerland  in  its  Conflict  with  Pietism  ami  Separatism  during  the 
Seventeenth  and  Eighteenth  Centuries. 

Third  Number.— G.  Bittchee,  Life  of  Peter  Abelard.  7.  Gbote,  Andreas  Mus- 
culus.  S.  Lixder,  The  Weininger  Affair  in  the  Years  150S-1G0O,  a  Contribu- 
tion to  the  History  of  the  Controversies  between  Lutherans  and  Reformed. 
9.  RoXSCH,  Testimonies  of  the  Fathers  on  the  First  Latin  Version  of  the  Bible. 

The  most  interesting  article  in  the  above  two  numbers  is  that  by 
Dr.  Herzog,  the  editor  of  the  Theological  Cyclopedia,  on  Fenelon. 
It  is,  like  the  article  on  St.  Elizabeth  in  a  former  number  by  Dr. 
Kahnis,  in  the  form  of  a  lecture,  and,  on  account  both  of  its  subject 
and  its  form,  is  certain  to  interest  a  much  larger  number  of  readers 
than  the  great  majority  of  articles  in  this  Review.  Dr.  Herzog 
treats  of  Fenelon,  first  as  the  educator  of  the  Dauphin,  next  as  the 
apologist  of  the  pure  love  to  God,  and,  in  the  third  place,  as  a 
patriot  and  politician.  An  interesting  letter  is  published  in  the 
third  part  of  the  article,  in  which  Fenelon  severely  criticises  the  policy 
pursued  by  Louis  XIV.,  and  which  shows  him  to  have  been  imbued 
by  truly  liberal  principles  at  a  time  when  nearly  all  statesmen 
bowed  their  knr-e  to  the  absolutism  of  Louis  XIV.  The  letter  was 
not  printed  until  1 '787, when  D'Alembert  published  it  for  the  first 
time  in  his  History  of  the  Members  of  the  French  Academy.  Its 
authenticity  was  long  doubled,  but  all  doubts  were  dispelled  in 
1S35  by  the  discovery  of  the  original,  the  whole  of  which  was 
clearly  in  the  handwriting  of  Fenelon. 

ZEiTSCiiKirT   pub    WlSSEXSOHAFTLICUE   Theology.     (Journal  for  Scientific  The- 
ology.)    1869.     First  Number.— 1.  Lipsius,  The  Dialectics  of  Schleiermacher. 
2.  lionv.MAN.s",  The  Relation  of  the  Gospel  of  John  to  the  Synoptical  Go 
?..  Spiegel,    Hardenbcrg's    Views    Concerning   the   Lord's   Supper.    4.  Egli, 
Biblical  Notes. 

Second    Number. — ">.   LiPSics,   The   Dialectics    of  Schleiermacher,    (concluded.) 

6.  Holtzmanx.  The  Relation  of  the  Gospel  of  John  to  the  Synoptical  Gospels. 

7.  Obeebeck,  On  Rom.  viii,  4.     8.  Roxsch,  Remarks  on  the  Assuinptio  Mosis. 
9.  Hilgexfeld,  The  Pastor  i  fllermas. 

Third  Number.— 11.  Lipsius,  The  Pastor  of  Hennas.  12.  Grimm,  The  D(  s 
Rom.  ix,  5.  13.  Immer,  On  Biedcrmann's  "  C7  'stliche  Dogmatik."  1'.* 
ens,  The  Sources  for  the  Ili  toryofthe  Essenes. 

The  history  of  the  Essenes  has  been  for  a  series  of  years  a  favorite 
topic  for  the  contributors  to  this  periodical.  The  last  named  article, 
by  Dr.  Clemens,  a  young  scholar  who  i^  already  favorably  known 
by  a  work  on  the  subject,  is  another  valuable  addition  to  tlii- 
literature.  The  author  enters  into  a  thorough  examination  of  the 
credibility  of  the  accounts  of  Joscphus,  Philo,  and  Pliny,  the 
only  three  writers  on  the  Essenes  who  were  their  contemporaries, 


1869J  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  4-17 

and  from  whom  the  accounts  of  nil  subsequent  writers  have  been 
derived. 

The  articles  of  Hilgenfeld  and  Lipsius  on  the  Pastor  of  Hernias 
are  both  directed  against  the  recent  work  on  that  subject  by  a 
young  theologian  of  the  evangelical  school,  Dr.  Zahn.  As  one  of 
the  eai'liest  among  the  post  apostolic  writings  of  the  Christian 
Church,  the  Pastor  of  Hernias  is  a  work  of  great  importance  for 
settling  the  controversies  relating  to  the  first  period  of  the  history 
of  the  Christian  Church. 

The  Christian  Dogmatics  of  Professor  Biedennann  of  Zurich, 
(Christliehc  Dogmatik,  Zurich,  1869,)  which  i^  briefly  noticed  in 
the  thirteenth  article  by  Professor  Irnmer,  of  the  University  of 
Berne,  is  the  most  ultra  rationalistic  work  on  the  subject  which  has 
yet  appeared.  Biedennann  is  one  of  the  chief  representatives  of 
the  new  rationalistic  school  in  the  Reformed  Church  of  Switzerland, 
which  openly  reject  even  the  belief  in  a  personal  God  and  the 
immortality  of  the  soul,  and  yet  deem  it  right  to  retain  their 
membership  in  the  Reformed  State  Churches  first  organized  by 
Calvin  and  ZuinsILus. 


Aet.  XL— QUARTERLY  BOOK-TABLE. 
Religion,)   Theology,   and  Biblical  Literature. 

THE  EPISCOPAL  CORRESPONDENCE  OX  CHURCH  REUNION. 
Our  venerable  Mother  Church,  the  Methodist  Episcopal,  has  a 
powerful  hand,  but  a  liberal  heart.  To  all  the  lesser  Methodisms 
she  extends  her  genial  invitation  to  become,  with  her,  one  family. 
Her  dignity  is  unoffended  by  their  declining.  Her  very  invita- 
tion means,  that  if  they  prefer  a  separate  home  they  are  none  the 
less  welcome  to  her  cucharistic  table  whenever  they  choose  to 
make  a  fraternal  visit.  It  is  thus  that  our  Bishops  lately,  in  the 
exercise  of  the  discretion  which  belongs  to  their  office,  availed 
themselves  of  the  meeting  of  the  Bishop9  of  the  Church  South  to 
bring  to  the  attention  of  the  latter  the  Commission  appointed  by 
our  General  Conference  on  Church  reunion.  The  great  body  of  the 
Church,  we  doubt  not,  approvcthis  action  and  the  address  of  our 
Bishops.  Of  the  response  from  the  Southern  Bishops,  we  regret 
to  say,  an  adverse  and  condemnatory  view  is  taken  by  a  large 
part  of  our  best  thinkers.  This  condemnatory  view  is  one-sided, 
and  arises  from  omitting  to   put   ourselves  in  the  stand-point  of 


448  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

those  Bishops,  in  allowing  too  little  to  human  nature,  and  in  for- 
getting our  own  past. 

For  more  than  thirty  years  we  have,  rightly  as  we  think, 
wrongly  as  they  thought,  talked  very  severe  things  to  and  of  the 
Church  South.  We  have  done  so  before  the  Avar,  during  the  war, 
since  the  war,  and  up  to  the  very  latest  dates.  All  at  once  we 
tune  down  to  a  very  gentle  melody,  and  of  course  wc  expect 
them  to  chime  in,  instanter,  with  just  as  gentle  a  harmony  !  Xo, 
indeed.  If  they  are  me)i,  either  in  the  higher  or  humbler  sense  of 
the  word,  they  will  not  do  it — just  as  Ave  would  not.  What, 
then,  do  they  ? 

They  do  just  as  wo  might  predict.  They  meet  the  address 
with  every  expression  of  love  and  courtesy,  with  every  assurance 
of  a  desire  for  peace  and  mutual  brotherhood,  hut  they  firmly  and 
frankly  state  the  feelings  that  still  exist  as  the  result  of  the  ter- 
rible past.  They  still  feel  the  sting  of  our  rejection  of  their  fra- 
ternal delegate  ;  they  reject  the  assumption  of  their  identification 
with  slavery,  or  of  their  being  on  a  level  with  Breeders  ;  they 
unfold  the  wrongs  they  hold  themselves  to  suffer  ;  frankly,  though 
in  undertone,  admitting  that  the  wrung  is  not  all  on  one  side,  and 
in  a  higher  tone  proposing  a  co-operative  effort  to  check  the  mu- 
tual wrong  and  secure  a  permanent  peace.  Their  reply  is  a 
peculiar  blending  of  an  earnest  desire  not  to  offend,  with  a  feel- 
ing of  distrust  for  so  sudden  an  overture,  and  a  firmly  determined 
purpose  to  avail  themselves  of  the  occasion,  which  our  Northern 
papers  do  not  usually  afford  them,  of  getting  their  views  before 
the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church. 

This  frank  holiness,  blended  with  every  effort  to  evince  a  fra- 
ternal purpose  in  that  very  holdncss,  we  approve.  We  have 
ourself  repeatedly  used  it,  and  before  this  article  closes  Ave  pur- 
pose to  use  it  again.  Our  readers  will  recollect  that  a  short  time- 
since  Ave  "read  a  lecture"?  to  Dr.  Summers,  referring  to  some 
hitter  points  hutli  of  the  past  and  future.  His  response  so  fully 
appreciated  both  the  plainness  of  our  speech  and  the  friendliness 
of  our  purpose,  as  to  lay  us  under  the  obligation  not  to  he  out- 
done in  magnanimity. 

The  Southern  Bishops  say  that  there  must  he  unity  of  heart, 
the  removal  of  strifes,  before  there  can  he  organic  unity.  Per- 
haps this  is  tin.-.  And  yet,  paradox  as  it  may  seem,  the  reverse 
order  may  he  the  true  order.  It  seems  to  us  nearly  true  that  the 
frank  offer  of  reunion  on  our  pari  is,  ipso  fact07  either  the  repa- 
ration, or  the  offer  of  reparation,  of  every  wrong,  as  well  as  settle- 
ment of  every  question.    Did  we  reject  their  oiler  offraternization  ? 


18G9.1  Quarterly  Book-Table.  449 

Surely  the  offer  of  a  reunion  is  a  cancellation  of  that  slight,  with 
a  surplus.  Do  we  impute  slavery  as  a  cause  of  separation? 
That  is  a  dead  issue  when,  regardless  alike  of  cause  or  occasion, 
we  say  we  know  no  cause  at  all  for  present  separation,  and  pro- 
pose reunion.  Do  we  impute  to  them  secession,  and  level  them 
with  schismatics?  We  say  Ave  are  ready  to  hold  them  ecclesias- 
tically as  good  as  ourselves,  and  recognize  them  upon  our  own 
level,  as  one  with  ourselves.  Have  there  heen  strifes  among  our 
Churches,  proselytisms,  and  "church-stealings?"  Tho^e  die  for- 
ever at  the  moment  of  reunion.  When  we  are  one  we  cannot 
proselyte  from  ourselves,  nor  steal  our  own  churches  from  our- 
selves. We  avow,  then,  the  paradox,  and  reverse  the  Bishops'  or- 
der; give  us  the  antecedent,  reunion,  and  we  will  guarantee  the  con- 
sequent, the  dismissal  of  dead  issues  and  the  settlements  of  strife. 
If,  however,  the  Southern  Bishops  mean  to  affirm,  as  the  only 
"basis"  of  reunion,  that  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  must 
recognize  the  validity  of  the  Plan  of  Separation,  and  hold  her  ju- 
risdiction over  her  Conferences  and  Churches  in  the  South  as  dejure 
null,  and  de  facto  a  usurpation,  that,  so  far  as  the  Bishops  are 
concerned,  closes  the  matter.  For,  first,  it.  bases  reunion  on  a  fal- 
sification of  facts  ;  and,  second,  it  prescribes  dishonorable  condi- 
tions. It  falsifies  facts,  for,  1.  The  Plan  of  Separation  tailing  of 
the  constitutional  vole  of  the  Annual  Conferences  attained  no 
valid  existence ;  and,  2.  The  boundaries  between  the  two  pro- 
posed sections  were  notoriously  disregarded  by  the  Church 
South,  which  attempted,  in  some  cases  with  violence,  to  acquire 
churches  in  the  Northern  section.  It  proposes  dishonorable  con- 
ditions y  for  since  our  Church,  recognizing  that  no  limitation  to 
her  evangelizing  work  existed,  occupied  Southern  territory,  she 
can  never  stigmatize  her  own  work  by  pronouncing  it  unlawful, 
or  abandoning  it  in  the  full  tide  of  its  success.  She  is  willing,  as 
we  believe,  to  wave  punctilio  and  past  questions,  and  proceed 
to  inaugurate  a  reunion;  she  is  willing,  as  the  result  of  that 
reunion,  that  the  Southern  territory  shall  come  under  a  .-ingle 
jurisdiction  ;  but  she  is  not  willing  to  condemn  her  own  present 
occupancy  of  the  South  as  a  transgression  and  a  crime.  Tin-  pro- 
posal would  be  rejected  as  a  contumely.  But  let  it  be  remem- 
bered that  it  is  only  the  Southern  Bishops  who  are  by  some  con- 
strued as  taking  this  ground.  There  is  time  yet  for  the  Southern 
General  Conference  in  May,  1870,  to  revise  the  position;  and 
then  there  is  a  further  time  for  the  people  of  the  two  • 
make  up  their  verdict.  After  a  full  and  conscientious  discussion 
of  the  cjuestion  for  one  or  two  years,  both  sections  being  fully 


450  Methodist  Quarterly  Review'.  [July, 

famished  with  the  argument  for  and  against,  ice  would  he  very 
willing  to  submit  ii  to  the  popular  vote  of  (tic  two  churches. 

The  difficulties  in  regard  to  Church  property  (trhioh  have  given 
rise  in  the  Church  South  to  the  unseemly  neologism,  "  church- 
stealing  ")  if  strongly  pressed  will  raise  a  political  discussion. 
The  temporary  occupancy  of  Southern  Churches  during  the  war 
raises  the  question,  What,  by  the  rules  of  war,  according  to  the 
laws  of  nations,  are  the  rights  of  a  government  over  ecclesiastical 
property  in  a  section  of  the  nation  in  rebellion  ?  What  are  those 
rights,  especially,  over  churches  used  in  aid  of  rebellion  ?  And, 
then,  Has  there  been  a  rebellion  ?  And  have  any  Southern 
Churches  aided  and  abetted  rebellion  ?  If  so,  "What  is  the  duty 
of  loyal  ministers  in  case  the  government  call  them  to  occupy  the 
churches  as  loyal  citizens?  It  will  be  perceived  that  each  party 
will  seethe  course  actually  pursued  to  be  right  or  wrong  according 
to  his  own  antecedent  political  views.  This  whole  question  had, 
therefore,  better  be  waived,  and  the  above  neologism  had  better  he 
dismissed  from  the  Southern  ecclesiastical  vocabulary.  As  to  all 
other  Church-property  difficulties,  we  apprehend  that  investiga- 
tion will  show  that  if  any  "  church-stealing  "  has  been  committed, 
the  Church  South  will  be  found  to  be  the  more  aggres:ivc  party. 

Dr.  Summers,  of  the  "  ISTashville  Advocate,"  in  noticing  Dr. 
Pech's  late  article  on  Methodism,  furnishes  the  following  views, 
which  views  are  indorsed  by  Dr.  Myers,  of  the  "Southern  Chris- 
tian Advocate,"  as  indicating  "  the  only  plan  of  union  which  may 
be  feasible  or  profitable  :" 

K  the  North  had  followed  out  in  pood  faith  the  provisions  of  the  brotherly  cove- 
nant proposed  and  urged  bj  its  chief  ministers  iu  1844,  and  which  we  kept  to  the 
letter,  there  might  have  been  to-day  one  great  (Ecumenical  Connection  in  the  Unit  d 
States,  with  perhaps  three  or  mere  General  or  Provincial  Conference! .  and  as  many 
Coll  .  ■.'.-:  ofBishops  as  the  rapidly-growing  Connection  and  widely-extending  coun- 
try might  require.    We  have  never  been  averse  to  such  a  fraternal  arrangement 
Had  our  Northern  brethren  abode  by  the  Plan  of  Separation,  Mel 
have  been  developed  into  a  higher  unity  than   it  had  before  the  division  of  the 
Church  in  1814.     Dr.  Elliott,  th  i  greal  cl  ampion  of  the  North,  said  then,  that  two 
General  Conferences  were   imperiously  required  by  the  rapid  growth  oi  tl 
nection,  and  he  iustanced  the  Provinces  of  Canterbury  and  York,   into  which  the 
Church  of  England  is  divided,  as  a  precedent  for  our  division.     Th  ro  might  have 
been  a  "  Methodist  Episcopal   Church  in  America,"  the  original  titl<    of  tl 
nection,  with  half  adoz  n  jurisdictional  divisions,  (General  C  d  Col- 

leges of  Bishops,)  and  a  Gen  ral  Co  u  il,  or  (Ecumenic  IC     ferci 
meet  at  stared  times  to  recognize  and  rati  y  ' 

there  would  not  have  been  the  disgrace  and  Bcandal  of  "altai  ■•"  and 

all  the  deplorablo  consequent  a  ol  such  schism.    God  knows  we  nevi  i  wanted  lo 
invade  their  territory,  or  to  infringe  upon  any  of  their  rights.     We  wante  I  I 
Methodism  a  unit,  the  world  over— every  particular  secti  in  rec  ignizing  t 
and  each  keeping  within  its  own  jurisdictional  bounds  as  in  the  case  with  cur  cir- 
cuit.-, districts,  and  Annual  Conferences.     Il  is  not  our  fault  that    this  i-<  not  the 
case. 


18C0J  Quarterly  Booh-TcMe.  451 

As  to  the  infringement  and  validity  of  the  "  Plan  of  Separa- 
tion," a  future  Quarterly  may  furnish  a  chapter  of  history  and 
exposition.  The  decision  of  the  Supreme  Court  settled  the  ques- 
tion of  law  as  to  the  Church  property  ;  but  it  had  no  ecclesiasti- 
cal or  moral  force  to  limit  our  evaugelizing  labors  or  church 
exteusion  within  any  geographical  section.  Nevertheless  we 
think  that  such  questions,  as,  Which  was  in  the  wrong  ?  Was 
slavery  the  cause  or  occasion  ?  Was  the  division  a  separation  or 
secession?  Was  the  Plan  of  Separation  legal  ?  etc.,  etc..  however 
interesting  as  history,  arc  dead  as  issues,  and  their  ghosts  should 
be  expelled  the  premises. 

Dr.  Myers,  in  the  "  Southern  Christian  Advocate,"  states  such 
conditions  as  these: 

1.  All  aggressions  upon  our  congregations,  members,  Churches,  white  or 
singly  or  in  a  body,    publicly  or  privately,  must  cease;  and  all  arrangements  that 
look  to  disinte  jrating  and  absorbing  our  communion  must  be  arrested. 

2.  Every  attempt  to  judge  us  as  Christians  or  Methodists  for  our  political  opin- 
ions or  public  acts  as  citizens,  and  all  animadversions  upon   our  [political] 

or  conduct,  must  come  to   a  sudden  pause.     Those  things  lie  out  of  the  range  of 
Church  questions,  and  we  refuse,  to  bejudged  therein  by  the  Church. 

The  first  of  these  conditions,  rightly  construed,  ought  to  he 
observed  in  any  case.  But  it  is  not  to  he  so  interpreted  as  to 
exclude  our  Church  from  the  Southern  States;  to  prevent  our 
asserting  the  rights  of  the  colored  Methodists  of  the  South;  to 
preclude  our  attracting  to  our  own  Church  all  who  felt  them- 
selves wronged  when  the  separation  cut  them  off  from  the  "  Old 
Church  ;"  or  to  prohibit  our  entering  into  that  fair  and  honorable 
competition  which  all  denominations  have  a  right  to  exerciM',  by 
both  a  public  and  private  exhibition  of  their  faith  and  order. 
None  of  these  rights  will  he  sacrificed  to  any  "  fraternization." 
Whatever  Church  denies  them  must  take  our  wager  of  battle. 

In  regard  to  Dr.  Myers's  second  condition,  the  very  offer  of  re- 
union is  "an  offer  to  dismics  dead  issues  ;  to  judge  no  man  as  a 
Methodist  adversely  from  historically  settled  questions ;  to  im- 
peach no  man  <:  as  a  citizen"  for  any  thing  not  immoral;  and  to 
hold  no  one  censurable  for  future  political  opinions  unless  ' 
opinions  contradict  our  religions  doctrines,  our  Church  order,  or 
common  Christian  morality.  The  term  "political"  cannot,  how- 
ever, in  general,  he  held  to  justify  or  cover  from  rebuke  any 
transgression  of  the  law  of  God.  A  man  who  insists  on  the 
right  as  a  politician  persistently  to  break  the  Sabbath,  or  t. 
tain  Sabbath-breaking,  we  do  condemn.  The  sins  of  politicians 
are  no  better  than  any  body  else's  sins. 


452  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

Since  penning  the  above  our  eye  recognizes  the  following  ful- 
ler statement  of  Dr.  Myers's  meaning: 

No  Church  will  ever  succeed  at  the  South  which  requires  Southerners  to  titler 
sentence  of  condemnation  against  their  honored  dead,  or  the  cause  in  which  they 
died.     They  do  not  do  this  to  become  citizens'  of  the  reconstructed  i 
will  not  do  it  under  ecclesiastical   dictation;  and  yet  they  will  provt  tht 
(7-5  faithful  to  the  Constitution  and  laws  of  (heir  country  as  an  those  irlo  hold  ■ 
opinions  respecting  political  questions.    The  xlvv  discussion,  then,  of  the  que 
Church  union  means — letall  political  opinions  whicli  divide  Northern  and  Southern 
citizens  be  ignored  ;  let  '  the  dead  past  bury  its  dead  ;'  throw  out  of  tl 
the  dead  issues  of  secession  and  slavery;  in  short,  consign  10  an  eternal  gri  . 
between  the  Northorn  and  the  Soutlx  rn  Methodists — the  one  Church  and  the  other — 
all  questions  of  secession,  slavery,  war,  suffrage,  and  the  like;  resolve  tl  at,  how- 
ever differing  in  opinion,  for  Christ's  sake  and  the  Gospel's,   there  shall  never  be 
introduced,  directly  or  indirectly,  into  any   Church,  court,  or  assembly,  great  or 
small,  in  document,  speech,  sermon,  exhortation,  prayer,  or  into  book i  r  ] 
(excepr  in  violation  of  the  spirit  of  the  compact  between  the  two  Churches,)  any 
reference  to  the  causes,  consequences,  history,  or  results  of  their  past  difficulties, 
in  any  such  way  as  could  offend  or   do   violence  willingly  to  the  most  delicate 
Christian  charity — that   they  will    never  bandy  such   epithets,  in  crimination  and 
recrimination,    as    slaveholder,    abolitionist,    pro-slavery,  secesh,  radical,  unionist, 
rebel,  and  such  like — will  try  to  forget  that  these  words  ever  had  any  application 
to  members  of  either  body,  or  that  the  opinions  and  acts  they  suggest  ever  had  any 
existence — or  if  ever  existing,  that  they  have  now  ceased  lobe  a  reason  for  any 
treatment  other  than  thatin  accord  with  the  sincerest  Christian  love.    If  we  know 
what  is  meant  by  Christian  forgiveness — without  which  no  proper  union  can  exist 
— this   is  the  temper,  spirit,  and  purpose  with    which   to  approach    this  question 
whicli  some  of  the  Northern  papers  are  proposing  to  discuss. 

We  do  not  agree,  as  a  general  principle,  that  respect  for  our 
ancestors  or  our  dead  hinds  us  to  maintain  their  opinions,  or  to 
indorse  all  they  did  as  right.  Truth  and  righteousness  are  inde- 
pendent of  human  relations.  Our  illustrious  dead  would  he 
not  our  benefactors  but  our  enemies  if  they  hound  our  souls 
to  error  and  wrong.  We  will  hind  garlands  around  their  tombs, 
hut  never  will  we  pay  them  so  poor  a  compliment  as  to  immo- 
late truth  and  peace  to  their  manes.  The  disposition  to  main- 
tain a  principle,  because  it  Mas  bequeathed  us  by  the  dead,  or 
because  it  belongs  to  our  side,  is  the  iniquitous  source,  all  through 
history,  of  perpetuated  falsehood,  hereditary  hate,  feud  and 
bloodshed.  But  the  principles  laid  down  by  Dr.  Myers 
as  fundamental  to  Church  unity,  though  needing  cxacter 
expression  on  one  point,  are  about  correct,  and  would 
tend  to  national  peace.  Our  Quarterly  would  7iot  engage,  for 
instance,  to  never  utter  an  ethical  condemnation  upon  slavery,  or 
upon  the  late  war  on  the  national  government ;  .and  yet  we  would, 
and  we  do,  avoid  referring  to  cither  with  the  animus  of  reproach 
upon  the  Church  South.  There  should  be  upon  neither  side 
cither  the  purpose  of  contumely,  or  a  cultivated  sensitiveness, 
anxious  to  take  offense,  and  proud  to  lay  hampers  upon  all  free 


1809.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  453 

utterance.  But  Dr.  Myers  impracticably  lays  down  this  platform 
as  condition  precedent  to  negotiation.  How  can  it  be  made  ob- 
ligatory, or  enforced  on  either  side,  previous  to  any  compact  ? 
How  can  Dr.  Myers  undertake  beforehand  to  keep  the  Episcopal 

Methodist  in  decent  order? 

And  now  it  is  our  turn  to  present  "conditions,"  and  utter  frank 
statements.  And  they  shall  not  be  selfish  conditions,  seeking  our 
own  good,  but  seeking  right-dealing  toward  a  third  party — the 
negroes.  We  should  have  been  almost  entirely  opposed  to  any 
organic  effort  to  take  possession  of  southern  territory  but  for  what 
appeared  to  us  to  be  the  manifest  purpose  of  Southern  Methodism 
— to  retain  the  negro  as  nearly  as  possible  in  his  original  state  of 
ignorance  and  serfdom.  The  southern  editors  claimed  that  the 
negro  was  still  exclusively  theirs;  that  they  only  "understood 
the  negro;"  that  every  body  else  must  keep  "hands  off."  They 
launched  their  nicknames  and  denunciations  at  the  incoming 
teachers  from  the  North.  At  the  same  time  every  imputation 
was  heaped  upon  the  negro  character  for  laziness  and  vice,  result- 
though  they  were  of  centuries  of  a  most  cruel  and  debasing  legis- 
lation;  and  last  came  those  ominous  predictions  that  the  negro 
race  would  soon  die  out.  The  absolute  condition  of  any  fraternity, 
on  our  part,  is  generous  justice  to  the  colored  Methodism  of  the 
South.  The  spirit  of  oppression  that  seeks  to  disfranchise  and  de- 
grade must  cease.  We  do  not,  however,  condemn  schools,  churches, 
or  conferences  intended  for  one  color,  where  both  colors  consent. 
Every  man,  also,  has  the  right  to  select  his  own  social  intimates; 
and  the  negro  does  not  ask  promiscuous  sociality.  He  asks,  and 
he  must  have,  fair  play  in  life  to  develop  his  most  noble  man- 
hood. How  fully  the  Church  South  is  now  ready  to  accord 
these  rights  we  know  not;  but  the  apparent  evidence  is  yet  in 
the  negative.  The  (Philadelphia)  "Christian  Recorder,"  edited 
by  a  negro,  utters  its  own  views  in  the  following  strong,  probably 
exaggerating,  language : 

In  do  part  of  our  CI  urch  are  more  di    perate  efforts  madet  iiirelu  - 

and  the  people  who    '         unit    I  with  us  lhan  in  Kentucky.     Thi 
Ir .      :  \  .  ■  Mel 

:  sachers  aud  tl  om,  at  the  dawnof  libertj  !  off  with  con- 

t,  mpt,  not  allowed  I  i  er  way.     Talk- 

ing with  one  of  our  ;  meof  I 

em  preachers,  lie  incidentally  made  the  remark,  u\ 
of  lying  to  a  black  man  than  though  it  were  nothing.' 
tent  this  is  true  all  ovi  i  tl     8:  >uth.      So  seared  arc  tin  in  I     '  : 

not  feel  themselves  bound  to  be  truthful  to  the  negro.     "  No  faith  l 
was  the  wat  hen  of  the  Romanist.     "No  faith  with  negroes,"  is  the  watchword 
of  tb    Southern  Methodist. 

Foueth  Series,  Vol.  XXL— 29 


45-1  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

Again  : 

"We  do  not  think  we  over-estimate  the  fact,  when  we  state  that  there,  are  now  about 
five  times  the  number  of  schools  and  school-houses  at  the  South  to  what  then.'  wag 
previous  to  the  war.  All  classes  arc  now  going  to  school.  The  sons  oft! 
whites  and  negroes  now  vie  with  the  sons  of  the  grandees.  A  generation  hence 
the  country  can  make  an  estimate  of  the  relative  capacity  of  the  two  races.  This 
could  never  be  done  before;  yet  did  our  enemies  do  it,  and  pronounce  against  us; 
but  their  very  condemnati  >■.  was  our  glory.  What  was  it?  It  was  that  a  black 
untaught  did  not  know  as  much  as  a  while  taught — that  a  negro  boy  out  of 
could  not  keep  up  witb  a  white  boy  in  school.     Astounding  judgment ! 

The  lime  has  come,  brethren  of  the  South,  for  considering  negro 
testimony.  The  paper  above  quoted  is  not  inferior  to  the  average 
of  your  own  periodicals  in  moral  or  intellectual  character.  And 
now  it  removes  all  hesitation  on  the  part  of  any  section  of  our  ven- 
erable Church  when  we  are  convinced  that  the  wrong  indi- 
cated, perhaps  exaggerated,  in  the  above  testimony  is  in  fair  way 
of  being  surely  renounced.  And  when  our  Bishops  respond,  as 
"wehopethcy  will,  to  the  very  proper  offer  of  the  Southern  Bishops 
to  unite  in  conciliating  Church  quarrels,  we  trust  they  will  also 
propose,  as  absolute  conditions,  to  unite  in  giving  full  fair  play  to 
the  colored  race.  With  that  plank  superadded  we  are  ready,  and 
the  Church,  softened  by  advancing  time,  soon  will  be  ready,  to  ac- 
cept Dr.  Myers's  paragraph  substantially  as  a  basis.  And  then, 
looking  to  a  future  (Ecumenical  Methodism  as  foreshadowed  by 
Dr.  Peck  and  indorsed  by  Dr.  Summers,  the  Churches  can,  by 
a  true  Christian  policy,  attain  a  wise  reunion. 


Foreign  Missions:  ftefr  Relations  and  Claims.  By  Runts  Anderson,  D.D.,  LLP., 
Late  Foreign  Secretary  of  the  American  Board  of  Commissioners  for  Foreign 
Missions.     ]2mo..  pp.  373.     New  York:  Charles  Scribner  &  Co.     1SG0. 

At  the  age  of  threescore  and  ten  Dr.  Anderson  resigned  Ids  office, 
after  a  service  of  forty  years,  and  was  appointed  to  an  endowed 
Lectureship  lor  Audover  Theological  Seminary.  His  course  of 
lectures,  delivered  in  the  most  important  of  his  denominational 
Seminaries,  are  now  embodied  in  this  handsome  volume.  They 
furnish  the  results  of  lung  years  of  observation  and  experience  ;  they 
were  heard  with  earnest  attention  by  very  competent  audieuces; 
and  they  furnish  thought  equally  important  tor  all  the  C'lri; 
engaged  in  the-  work  of  evangelical  missions. 

Dr.  Anderson's  view  of  the  missionary  held,  though  recognizing 
that  fifty  years  have  accomplished  but  little  more  than  preparatory 
work,  is  confident  that  it  is  a  grand  preparation,  and  sanguincly 
assured  of  final  success  in  rendering  a  living  Christianity  the  religion 
of  the  race.  He  commences  with  an  expanded  view  of  the  simulta- 
neous double  work  of  the  Church's  awakening  to  the  missionary 


1SC9.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  455 

enterprise,  and  the  providential  breaking  away,  of  the  national 
barriers,  in  succession,  furnishing  a  wonderful  access  to  the  peaceful 
armies  of  the  cross.  As  Jehovah  has  said  to  the  Church,  "  Awake," 
he  has  also  said  to  the  world,  "  Give  way." 

Tracing  by  the  light  of  Scripture  and  history,  as  furnished  in 
the  Xew  Testament,  in  the  Irish  missions,  and  others  of  the  early 
Church,  Dr.  Anderson  develops  the  principles  and  discusses  the 
methods  of  our  modern  missions,  both  in  enlisting  the  interest  of 
the  Church  at  home,  and.  in  attaining  a  broad  and  permanent  suc- 
cess abroad,  lie  then  gives  a  brief  sketch  of  the  foreign  Held  as  it 
now  stands,  furnishes  a  bird's-eye  view  of  the  entire  army  of  occupa- 
tion, showing  the  degree  of  success  attained,  and  the  proper  view 
of  the  success  attainable.  This  is  a  cheerful,  instructive,  and 
timely  book.  To  the  inquirer  about  the  missionary  held  challeng- 
ing "What  of  the  night?"  it  is  the  vigilant  watchman's  answer, 
"The  morning  cometh,  arid  also  the  night." 

It  seems  very  amazing  that  the  American  Board  and  other 
missionary  managers  have  discovered  hut  lately,  and  as  if  by 
accidental  experience,  that  the  true  method  is  to  train  up  the 
earliest  possible  native  workers,  and  to  throw  the  native  Churches 
as  early  as  possible  upon  their  own  strength.  In  the  Sandwich 
Islands,  when  the  missionaries  were  driven  oil' by  French  invasion, 
the  natives  selected  their  own  religious  leaders,  and  for  the  hist 
time  displayed  and  developed  their  own  independent  vigor.  When 
Madagascar,  after  a  period  of  missionary  successful  labor,  expelled 
the  missionaries,  the  native  Christians,  arising  from  the  apparent 
weakness  of  their  pupilage,  not  only  showed  themselves  self-sus- 
taining, but  displayed  a  spirit  of  martyrdom  worthy  the  apostolic 
age.  Dr.  Anderson  lays  down  the  rule  that  the  foreign  missionary 
should  never  become  pastor  of  a  mission  Church  ;  but,  appointing 
a  native  pastor,  should  remain  in  the  broad,  apostolic  held. 

Dr.  Anderson  well  refutes  the  idea,  every  now  and  then  uttered 
with  oracular  authority  by  ignorant  editors  of  secular  papers,  that 
civilization  must  precede  Christiauizaliou.  The  pseudo-experience 
of  men  who  never  studied  missions  is  constantly  reasserting  this 
fallacy,  falsified  by  the  whole  history  of  missions.  The  barbarian 
mind  is  a  vacant  mind,  and  you  have  not  to  empty  it  of  a  powerful 
preoccupant.  Idolatry  does  not  satisfy,  and.  gives  way  easily  to  a 
higher  system.  Hence  we  have  more  hope  of  heathenism  than  of 
Mohammedanism  and  Romanism.  There  are  in  the  latter  two 
systems  elements  of  elevated  truth  that  serve  a<  conservatives  to 
the  error:  but  in  the  blank,  uncivilized  religions,  is  a  moral  basis 
for  industrious  habits  ami  healthful  civilization. 


456  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

Dr.  Anderson's  work  is  well  worthy  the  study  of  both  the  friends 
and  opponents  of  missions. 


Fiftietk  Annuo.'  Report  of  tlie  Missions))/  Society  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church 
for  the  Year  1868.     Svo.,  pp.  184.     New  York. 

Upon  our  excellent  Annual  Report,  which  has  been  before  the 
Church  some  months,  we  oiler  no  remarks,  but  make  a  few 
points  on  the  present  aspects  of  our  missionary  enterprise  itself. 

The  fact  that  our  Secretaries,  cannot,  in  our  whole  Church,  find 
the  proper  individuals  to  man  our  fields,  is  not  only  sad  in  itself, 
but  suggestive  of  other  sad  things.  It  suggests  that  our  mission- 
ary zeal  is  too  superficial  and  routine.  The  missionary  enterprise 
is  accepted,  of  course,  as  an  established  thing;  but  our  people,  if 
not  ministry,  seem  to  know  little  specifically  about  it,  and  feel  less. 
How  is  it  that  so  few  of  our  young  men  are  taught  and  inspired 
by  the  preaching  they  hear  to  burn  with  a  holy  ambition  to  carry 
the  Gospel  to  the  dark  peoples  ?  How  is  it  that  of  so  many 
young  ministers  entering  our  Conferences  "moved  by  the  Holy 
Client,"  so  few,  oi-  so  almost  none  at  all,  are  consecrated  in  spirit 
to  the  wide  parish  of  the  world?  How  is  it  that  already,  in  each 
of  our  theological  schools,  there  are  not  the  full  dozen  waiting  for 
the  Macedonian  call '?  The  whole  Church  ought  to  cherish  a 
sen^e  of  self-condemnation  until  this  shame  disappears. 

A  million  dollars  a  year  ought  to  be,  without  spasm  or 
struggle,  but  easily  and  normally,  raised.  For  this  purpose  the  next 
General  Conference,  we  trust,  will  authorize  and  cause  to  be  put 
in  motion  the  plan  of  a  dollar  a  member  through  the  whole 
Church.  We  cannot  but  hope  that  our  respected  Secretaries 
will  feel  encouraged  to  construct  the  proper  plan  for  adoption. 

Ought  there  to  be  a  distinct  missionary  seminary  established  ? 
or  ought  the  missionary  work  t<>  occupy  largely  the  attention  of" 
our  present  seminaries?  For  the  present,  certainly  the  latter. 
The  Boston  school  claims,  at  the  present  time,  to  take  the  lead  in 
the  importance  it  gives  to  this  department,  and  we  hope  it  will 
earnestly  strive  to  justify  the  claim.  But  so  long  as  the  Sec- 
retaries are  compelled  to  say  that  any  field  calls  vainly  for  an 
occupant,  our  b<  minaries  must  lay  vigorous  claim  to  a  large  share 
of  the  responsibility.  There  is  not  a  student  within  their  walls 
who  ought  not  to  examine  his  own  case  before  God. 

One  great  reason,  we  might,  perhaps,  say,  the  great  reason, 
why  our  missionary  zeal  is  so  routine  is,  that  our  system,  as 
brought  before  the  people,  is  a  vague  generality.    They  are  asked 


1809.]  Quarterly  Book -Table.  457 

to  "give  for  the  missionary  cause;"  and  their  gift  is,  as  it  v. ore, 
flung  into  an  unknown  sea.  Whether  it  goes  to  India  or  Michi- 
gan the  giver  never  knows.  By  our  ministers  little  or  no  mission- 
ary history  is  ever  given  ;  the  missionary  map  is  seldom  exhibited 
and  explained,  and  no  specific  interest  is  felt.  We  have  often 
surmised,  that  if  every  Conference  of  the  Church  had  some  one 
missionary  ground  to  sustain,  or  some  one  or  more  missionaries 
to  support,  an  immense  deal  of  new  interest  would  be  created, 
and  a  much  larger  amount  raised. 

One  illustration  of  the  routiue  character  above  specified  is,  the 
character  of  missionary  speeches  delivered  at  the  anniversaries. 
The  speakers  seem  to  know  that  there  is  a  missionary  effort  in 
process  to  convert  the  world.  Upon  this  point  they  are  often 
very  eloquent,  and  present  the  grand  idea  with  such  impressive- 
ncss  that  the  Church  has  very  fully  acquired  it.  And  in  thai 
idea  lies  the  large  amount  of  our  missionary  strength.  But  in 
these  speeches  you  usually  see  little  reference  to  any  specific 
fact  in  the  present  state  of  that  effort.  You  are  half  inclined  to 
suspect  that  the  speaker  himself  is  not  very  thorough  in  his 
acquaintance  with  it. 

John's  Gospel.  Apolog-ol ical  Lectures.  By  J.  J.  Van  Oosterzkk.  D.  P.,  Profc 
Theology  in   the  University  of  Utrecht.     Translated,  with  additions,  by  J.  P. 
Hurst!""   12rao.,  pp.   25G.     Edinburgh:  T.  &  T.  Clark.     New  York:  Scribner, 
TVe-lford,  &  Co. 

It  is  a  marvelous  power  of  work  displayed  by  Dr.  Hurst,  that 
besides  the  duties  of  his  seminary,  his  contributions  to  periodicals, 
his  translation  of  Hagenbach,  and  his  forthcoming  translation  of 
the  Commentary  on  Romans  for  Dr.  Schaff,  he  should,  as  seed 
by  the  way-side,  throw  out  this  little  volume  of  Van  Oosterzi  e. 
lie  furnishes  an  example  followed  by  too  few  of  our  young  scholars. 
Van  Oosterzc1  is  already  known  in  America  as  one  of  the 
contributors  to  Lange's  Commentary.  lie  is  one  of  the  most 
eloquent  preachers  and  profound  scholars  of  Holland,  a  little 
more  than  fifty  years" of  age.  His  great  qualities  entitle  him  to 
measure  weapons  with  the  haughtiest  skeptics  of  Europe.  Tl  - 
prescut  volume  is  a  course  of  lectures  by  him,  delivered  to  : 
ami  intelligent  audience  in  the  Odeon  of  Amsterdam  with  go  »d 
effect.  They  are  preluded  with  a  preface  by  Dr.  Hurst  i 
letter  from  the  author  to  him,  and  consist  of  four  very  valuable 
and  highly  interesting  pieces,  namely.  On  the  Authenticity  of 
John's  Gospel,  On  John  and  the  Synoptics,  John's  Miracles  of 
Jesus,  and  John's  Christ. 


458  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

There  is  less  concentration  and  positiveness  of  style  than  we 
expect  in  a  great  orator.  Yet  in  spite  of  a  very  slight  Teutonic 
haze  and  languor  of  style,  the  argument  in  its  full  volume  is 
stated  with  much  freshness  and  conclusiveness.  He  sheds  touches 
of  light  on  a  succession  of  points;  and  to  those  who  have  been 
perplexed  by  the  plausibly  stated  difficulties  of  John  he  suggests 
very  plausible  solutions.  One  thing  stands  finally  as  clear  as 
day:  the  Bteptic  disregards  all  scientific  criticism  in  rejecting  the 
authenticity  of  this  Gospel;  his  sole  final  practicable  resort  is 
that  taken  by  Kenan,  and  finally  by  Strauss,  to  admit,  the  authen- 
ticity and  deny  its  veracity,  on  the  ground  mainly  that  all  mira- 
cles are  fictitious. 

This  Gospel,  including  the  others,  differs  from  all  other  books 
containing  miracles  in  this,  that  the  miracles  are  not  incidental, 
hut  the  main  tiling.  Christ  himself  is  the  miracle  ;  and  so  a 
Gospel  is  miracle  from  end  to  end.  Tacitus  and  Livy  subsidiarily 
weave  in  miracles  ;  but  this  Gospel  takes  the  bull  by  the  horns, 
and  is  boldly  all  mh'aclc.  And  these  miracles  are  not  scientific 
performances,  such  as  a  chemist  performs  in  his  laboratory,  nor 
to  be  tried  by  scientific  tests.  They  belong  to  the  region  of 
spirit,  and  are  to  be  appreciated  in  the  temper  of  a  spiritual  and 
yet  perfectly  rational  faith. 

Tlie  Sermons  of  Henry  Ward  Beecher  in  Plymouth  Church,  Brooklyn.  From  Verbatim 
Reports  bv  T.  J.  Kr.i.Txwooi).  "Plymouth  Pulpit,"  First  Series:  September, 
1868-March,  1869.     8vo.,  pp.  438.    New  York:  J.  B.  Ford  &  Co.     1869. 

More-  Hashes  and  detonations  from  the  powerful  battery  of  that 
great  brain,  and  the  still  more  powerful  battery  of  that  great 
heart.  It  is  suggestive  to  be  called  to  read  Beecher  and  Spurgeon 
within  the  same*  few  hours.  In  Spurgeon  we  see  revived  one  of 
the  great  Puritan  preachers  of  the  seventeenth  century,  rugged, 
oaken,  dogmatic,  evangelical,  intensely  Christian.  If  this  nine- 
teenth century,  with  its  London  Times,  and  criticism,  and  rail- 
roads, and  liberalism  does  not  like  him,  still  there  he  is,  a  live 
fact;  and  what  <-1i><.^  the  nineteenth  century -propose  to  do  about 
it?  Mr.  Beecher's  problem  is  to  identify  himself  with  the  nine- 
teenth century  in  its  intensest  spirit,  to  lead  its  onward  march,  i" 
surrender  all  inconsistent  with  its  demands,  and  yet  to  retain  last 
hold  of  Christ  in  the  soul.  It  is  a  diificult  problem.  We  Buspect 
that  Mr.  Beecher  makes  many  a  minor  mistake.  We  often  fear 
lest  he  surrender  that  firm  hold  ;  we  often  think  he  makes  unneces- 
sary surrenders.  But  his  problem  is  his  mission,  and  we  trust  he 
will  work  it  out  triumphantly. 


1SG9.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  459 

The  JDay-Daum  and  The  Rain,  andoiher  Sermons.    By  Rev.  John  Ker,  Glasgow, 
Scotland.     12mo.,  pp.  450.    New  York :  Robert  Carter  &  Brothers.     1   ;  19. 

•Mr.  Ker's  name  is  new  to  us,  but  these  beautiful  sermons  form  a 
very  favorable  introduction  to  it.  The  British  Quarterly  thus 
characterizes  him : 

All  good  sermons  arc  now  compared  to  Robertson's,  and  possibly  all  sermon 
writers  since  him  have  drunk  in  his  spirit.     Mr.  Ker  is  of  his  school,  and  with  the 
exception  of  the  posthumous  sermons  of  Mr.  E.  L.  Hull,  we  have  mel  with  i 
worthy  of  standing  by  his  side.     Mr.  Ker's  thought,  although  perfectly  simple  and 
natural,  is  fresh  and  bold;  and  if  ic  may  not  claim  absolute  originality,  it  : 
claim  that  distinctive  individuality  which  indicates  the  honest  and  vigorous  inde- 
pendent thinker,  who,  whatever  lie  may  owe  to  other  men,  owes  it  on 
owes  nutriment.     His   style   is  quirt  and  cha  te,  every  thing  is. said  with  the  ut- 
most simplicity,  but  also  with  a  refined  beauty  which  works  like  a  spell.     There  is 
scarcely  a  fine  sentence  in  the  volume,  but  neither  is  there  a  common-pl;  ■ 
tence.    Every  thing  is  quietly,  easily,   naturally  produced  and   set  forth;  but  its 
qualities  of  thougbtfulness,  suggestiveness,  and  strength  arethose  whic!   i  ■■ 
men  would  vainly  strive  after.     Mr.  Ker  isa  thoroughly-cultured  man.  and  yet  un- 
compromisingly and  devoutly  evangelical.     His  thought  and  reading  have  l< 
to  an  unhesitating  acceptance  of  the  great  verities  of  the  Evangelical  cr 
however,  in  any  creel  shape,  but   in  their  thorough  adaptation  to  the  Dati  i 
necessities  of  human  souls.     The  doctrine  is   every  where   humanized,  and   pre- 
sented in  vital  forms  of  human  need  and  experience. 


Cfiristian Purity ;  or.  The  Heritage  of  Faith.  Revised,  Enlarged,  and  Adapted  to 
the  Later  Phases  of  the  Subject.  By  Rev.  R.  S.  Foster,  D.D.,  L.L.P.  With  an 
Introduction  by  Bishop  Jaxks.  1 2mo.,  pp.  364.  New  York :  Carlton  ft  Lanahan. 
Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  ft  Walden.     18G9. 

It  is  nnnecessary  for  its  to  commend  a  work  which  1ms  for  years 
been  accepted  by  the  Church,  and  which  now  conies  forth  renewed 
by  the  author's  matured  thought  and  experience.  Though  treat- 
ing a  subject  reaching  the  inmost  recesses  of  mind,  Dr.  Foster, 
while  writing  to  be  tested  by  the  metaphysician,  writes  more 
truly  for  the  popular  reader.  Avoiding  the  technics  of  theology 
he  endeavors  to  so  state  his  views,  like  a  guiding  and  loving 
teacher,  as  to  bring  the  willing  heart  to  the  decisive  point  oC 
Christian  experience.  It  will  be  a  gratifying  consideration  that 
Dr.  Foster  carries  not  only  his  views,  but  Ins  feelings  and  his 
purposes,  into  the  professorship  to  winch  he  has  so  worthily  been 
called. 

The  work  will  be  reviewed  in  a  full  article  of  a  future  Quarterly. 


Ant  dotes  of  the  Wesleys.    Illustrative  of  their  Character  and  Personal  Flisl  ry.     By 
Rev.  J.  B.Wakeley.    With  an  Introducl  '   '    ■ 

lCmo.,  pp.  391.     New  Turk:  Carlton  &  Lauahan.     l 

A  book  for  the  million,  and  we  wish  that  a  million  copies  could  be 
forthwith  sold,  the  lady  author  of  "The  Gales  Ajar"  tells  usthat 
there  will  be  the  witticism  and  the  laugh  in  heaven.    And  Mr.  Wake- 


460  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

ley  loves  a  smiling,  if  not  a  laughing,  religion  ;  and  loves  to  presenl 

his  saints  with  their  most  radiant  face  on,  and  to  send  them  forth 
brightening  tbc  faces  of  his  million  readers. 

These  anecdotes  are  arranged  in  five  classes,  each  class  gathered 
around  its  own  hero  ;  namely,  Samuel  Wesley,  Susanna:1.  Wesl  y. 
John  Wesley,  Charles  Wesley,  and  Charles  Wesley,  Jun.  The 
whole  presupposes  some  interest  in  the  reader  for  the  Wesleys ; 
and,  in  fact,  it  is  very  much  a  popular  history  of  the  wondrous 
family  in  sprightly,  anecdotal  form.  This  is  a  memorable  history, 
and  we  rejoice  to  send  it  out  in  this  most  popular  guise. 


The.  Satdt  it's   Scripture  History.— The    Old   Testament    History.     From  ti. 
ation  to  the  Return  of  the  Jews  from  Captivity.     Edited  by  William  Smith, 
LL.D.,  Classical  Examiner  in  the  University  of  London.   With  Maps  and  Wood- 
cuts.    12mo.,  pp.  715.      New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers. 

We  have  had  occasion  to  make  much  use  of  Dr.  Smith's  New 
Testament  History,  and  have  found  it  a  remarkable  specimen  of 
thorough,  ultimate  erudition,  clothed  in  a  style  condensed,  clear, 
and  gracefnl.  The  present  volume,  we  judge,  from  a  cursory  ex- 
amination, to  he  an  equally  excellent  accompaniment.  By  noth- 
ing in  our  language,  can  the  rugged  old  volumes  of  Shuckford 
and  Prideaux  he  so  successfully  and  relievingly  replaced.  Both 
volumes  would  he  valuable  occupants  of  a  place  in  our  course  of 
ministerial  study. 

No  Sect';  in  Heaven,  au'l  other  Poems.     By  Mrs.  E.  H.  J.  Cleavitland.     2 
pp.  95.    New  York:  Clark  &  Maynard. 

A  little  gem  of  decidedly  piquant  and  sprightly  poetry.  The  first 
piece,  ':  Xo  Sects  in  Heaven,"  is  well  couceived  in  the  general,  but 
fails  in  the  details.  We  do  not  see  why  Dr.  Watts  appears  as  n 
"sect,"'  or  why  he  must  leave  his  immortal  '-hymns  and  psalms" 
behind  him  in  going  to  heaven.  We  doubt  not  that  not  only  he, 
but  millions  after  him,  will  take  them  in  memory  and  heart  and 
chant  them  in  the  choirs  above.  Wesley  is  made  to  leave  behind 
him  his  31SS. ;  hut  we  opine  that  it  is  the  mere  paper  of  them  that 
is  left  behind,  not  their  thought  and  spirit.  "When  Bucll  men  as 
Watts  and  "Wesley  v;  rest  from  their  labors,"  "their  works  Mill  fol- 
low them." 


K.-  m  :  ]  ■■  E  ■   i  i  :  or,  !;'-;.'i;t  ga  ■■■'■  Event 
C.  H.  SrCRGEax.     12mo.,  pp.  400.     Xew  York :  Sheldon  &  Co.     I 

Spurgeon's  purpose  in  tie-  present  volume  is  to  furnish  a  page  ■■:' 
stirring  religions  thought  for  the'  hour  of  evening  devotion,  a-  a 
sequel  to  his  "Morning  by  Morning."     It  is  a  richly  evangelical 


1869.]  Quarter!,,  Book-Table.  4G1 

page  he  furnishes,  going  right,  with  life  and  power,  to  the  depths 
of  the  Christian  soul.  Hereby  you  may  have  such  a  preacher  as 
Spurgeon  pouring  his  faithful  monitions  in  your  ear,  tuning  and 
toning  the  heart  to  its  evening  prayer.  . 


Foreign  Theological  Publications. 

Die  leizten  Lebenstage  Jesu.     Ein   Biblisch-historischer  Versucb.     (The  Lasl 
of  the  Life  of  Jesus.    A  Biblical-Historical   Treatise.)    Von  Dr.  Joseph   Lax- 
gex.    Svc,  pp.  xii,  431.     Freiburg  im  Breisgau :  Herder.     1SG1. 

Das  Judenthum   in  Pal      '  Zeit  Chrisii     Ein  Beitrag  zur  OflTenbarung 

Religions  Geschichte  als  Einleitung  in  die  Theologie  di      Neuen    T 
(Judaism  in  Palestine  at  the  Time  of  Christ.     A  Contribution  to  Revi 
Religious  History,  as  an  Introduction  to  the  Tin  A  igy  vi'  the  New  Tesi 
You  Dr.   .Toseph  Laxgex.     Svo..   pp.  xiv,  528.    Freiburg  ira  Breisgau  :  Hi  r- 
der.     liOG. 

Professor  Langen  is  one  of  the  principal  representatives  of  Ca- 
tholicism in  Northern  Germany,  and  is  not  willing  that  Protest- 
antism should  monopolize  the  defense  of  Christianity ;  and  both 
his  works  may  be  regarded  as  among  the  best  contributions  of 
Catholic  theology  to  the  department  of  apologetics.  In  his  Last 
Days  of  the  Life  of  Christ  he  avows  his  principle  that  the  life  of 
Jesus  is  the  foundation  of  the  whole  order  of  salvation  recorded 
in  the  New  Testament,  and  the  center  of  the  whole  history  of  the 
world.  He  takes  up  the  last  week  in  the  life  of  Christ,  and  treats 
it  historically  instead  of  exegetically.  His  bias  as  a  Roman 
Catholic  may  be  seen  to  advantage  in  his  elaborate  treatment  of 
small  and  unimportant  points  connected  with  the  scene  of  the 
crucifixion.  For  instance,  we  have  a  lengthy  discussion  of  the 
question  whether  Christ  was  crucified  perfectly  naked  or  girded 
about  his  loins.  After  an  argument  covering  five  pages  he  con- 
cludes that  the  latter  was  the  case,  and  i-.  quite  right  when  he 
says  that  the  ancients  were  much  more  delicate  in  many  respects 
than  a  large  number  of  their  most  enthusiastic  admirers  of  ton- 
own  day.  Another  question  of  similar  character  is,  whether 
three  or  four  nails  were  used  in  crucifying  Christ.  If  there  writ- 
only  three,  one  foot  must  have  been  placed  above  the  other,  and 
one  nail  driven  through  both;  but  if  there  were  lour,  the  feel 
were  nailed  separately,  lie  finally  decides  in  favor  of  the  1 
The  concluding  portion  of  the  work,  Golgotha  and  the  Holy  S  p- 
ulcher,  i.>  a  learned  investigation  of  the  localities  connected  with 
the  closing  scenes  of  Christ's  life  on  earth.  The  English  authori- 
ties are  liberally  quoted,  and  our  American  Dr.  Robinson  is 
declared  to  be  the  most  importanl  of  all  the  recent  topographers 
of  Jerusalem.    lie  opposes  Iiobinson's  view,  however,  that  Acra 


462  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

was  situated  in  the  northwestern  part  of  Jerusalem,  and  closes 
his  argument  by  affirming  that  Roman  Catholic  tradition  is  the 
only  authority  on  which  we  can  rely  at  the  present  day  in  ascer- 
taining the  sacred  places  of  Jerusalem. 

Dr.  Langen,  in  his  Judaism  in  Palestine  at  the  time  of  Christ, 
addresses  himself  directly  to  the  attacks  of  Kenan,  Strauss, 
Schenkel,  and  Colani,  and  raises  the  objection  to  them  all  that 
their  accounts  of  Christ  are  utterly  unhistorical.  In  order  to 
prove  this  he  enters  into  a  thorough  examination  of  Judaism  at 
the  time  when  the  Messiah  made  his  appearance.  The  Jewish 
religious  views  were  neither  the  starting-point  nor  the  close  of  a 
development,  but  only  the  element  of  transition.  It  is  important 
to  see  what  was  the  relation  borne  by  the  Jewish  religious  views 
of  Christ's  time  to  the  Old  and  New  Testaments,  and  also  to 
trace  the  connection  of  later  Judaism  with  foreign  views,  and 
particularly  with  Hellenism.  Tire  Old  Testament  is  intimately 
related  to  the  New,  and  each  is  dependent  on  the  other.  Rut 
there  are  such  points  of  difference  between  them  that  an  apoc- 
rypha was  necessary  to  form  a  connecting  link  between  them, 
thus  uniting  the  Jewish  revelation  with  the  Hellenic  thoughts 
and  opinions  that  began  to  spread  over  the  Jewish  nation  at  the 
time  of  the  great  Grseco-Oriental  monarchy.  It  was  the  mission 
of  the  Romans  to  connect  the. whole  earth  into  one  great  unity, 
in  order  to  render  possible  the  universal  progress  of  the  Gospel. 
It  was  the  task  of  the  Grecian  mind,  as  it  ruled  the  whole  world 
at  the  time  of  Alexander  the  Great,  to  constitute  an  intellectual 
union  for  the  reception  of  God's  last  revelation  ;  while  it  was  the 
part  of  the  East  to  enter  into  connection  with  Hellenism,  so  that 
the  Hellenic  and  Oriental  spirit  might  be  propagated  over  all  the 
world.  The  book  abounds  in  many  good  thoughts,  and  the 
style  is  far  above  the  average  of  Continental  theol  >gians,  whether 
Protestant  or  Catholic.  The  following  is  its  comprehensive  plan  : 
Introduction.  I.  Historical  and  Critical  Inquiry  into  the  Original 
Literature;  1.  TheCanonical  Writings  of  the  Old  Testament  from 
the  Jewish-Hellenic  Period;  2.  The  Non-canonical  Books  which 
originated  iii  Palestine;  3.  The  Non-canonical  Books  oi'  Egyptian 
Origin;  4.  The  later  Jewish  Literature  and  the  Apocryphal 
Writings  of  the  New  Testament.  H.  The  Religious  Views  of 
the  Jews  of  Palestine  at  the  Time  of  Christ.  1.  The  Religious 
Parlies  in  Palestine;  2.  The  Doctrine  of  God ;  S.  The  Doctrine  of 
the  Logos;  4.  The  Doctrine  of  the  Holy  Spiril  ;  5.  Angel 
and  Demonology ;  0.  Anthropology;  7.  The  Expectation  of  the 
Messiah;  8.  Eschatology. 


1S09.1  Quarterly  Booh -Table.  403 

Die  altesten  Zeugnisse  betreffend  die  Sckriften  des  Neuen  Testamentes.  (The  Oldest 
Witnesses  on  the  Writings  of  the  New  Testament.)  Von  J.  FL  Scholten.  Aua 
dem  Hollandischen  iibersetzt,  v-on  Carl  Maxchot.  8vo.,  pp.  xii,  191.  Lreraen: 
H.  Gesenius.     ]  B67. 

A  pointed  and  outspoken  Dutch  reply  to  Tisehendorfs  "When 
were  our  Gospels  written?*'  a  -work,  as  is  well  known,  written  to 
prove  the  correctness  of  the  orthodox  view  of  the  early  origin  of 
the  Gospels.  The  German  translator,  Dr.  Manchot,  is  a  Bremen 
Pastor,  and  an  earnest  advocate  oi*  the  new  skeptical  theology  of 
the  Protestant  Unions.  Of  course  he  is  cheek  by  jowl  in  sym- 
pathy with  Dr.  Scholten,  whom  he  here  makes  to  speak  in  Ger- 
man. Scholten,  in  his  preface,  aims  to  destroy  Teschendorf's 
claim  to  any  critical  ability  whatever,  and  repeats  with  great 
gusto  the  opinion  of  Volkmar  of  Zurich  on  Tischendorf,  that  "he 
is  not  only  not  the  first  man  in  the  -whole  of  the  learned  world, 
but  that  he  is  a  perfect  stranger  in  it."  The  introduction  is  a 
continuation  of  similar  language  ;  it  is  not  only  superfluous,  how- 
ever, but  worse.  The  following  divisions  furnish  a  clear  idea  of 
the  scope  of  the  work:  1.  The  ecclesiastical  writers  down  to 
A.  D.  170;  2.  The  heretics:  3.  The  ecclesiastical  writers,  canons, 
and  translations,  A.  D.  170-200  ;  4.  Traces  of  doubt  on  the  apos- 
tolic origin  of  the  fourth  Gospel  at  the  end  of  the  second  cen- 
tury ;  5.  The  Apocryphal  Gospels  and  Pilate's  Acta.  The 
surprising  conclusions  at  which  Scholten  arrives  are,  that  there 
was  no  Canon  of  the  Books  of  the  New  Testament  before  A.  D. 
200  ;  that  not  a  hook  in  the  Old  Testament  was  regarded  as 
"Holy  Scripture"  before  A.  D.  170  or  175;  that,  down  to  the 
same  time,  if  we  except  a  few  of  Paul's  Epistles  and  John's  Rev- 
elation, no  author  was  mentioned  by  name;  that  at  the  time  of 
Papias  (A.  D.  125-140)  oral  tradition  was  much  more  highly 
respected  than  any  written  document;  that  it  is  very  uncertain 
whether  Papias,  in  his  reference  to  Matthew  and  Marie,  had  in 
mind  the  same  Gospels  attributed  to  them  which  we  have;  that 
it  is  not  clear  that  he  had  any  acquaintance  whatever  with  the 
third  Gospel;  that  there  is  no  sufficient  proof  for  the  existence  of 
our  three  synoptical  Gospels  before  the  time  of  Justin  Martyr; 
that  Paul's  writings  were  not  used,  or  regard..,!  with  respect,  by 
the  prominent  teachers  of  the  Church  until  the  middle  of  the 
second  century  ;  and  that  there  is  no  trace  of  John's  Gospel, 
either  in  the  writings  of  the  principal  ecclesiastical  authors,  or 
of  the  Gnostics,  or  of  the  first  Montanists,  until  A.  1).  170!  In 
fact,  if  we  except  a  l'^v  of  Paul's  Epistles  and  the  Revelation  of 
John,  history  has  nothing  to  say  on   the  whole  of  the  New  Tes- 


464  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

tament,  and  the  writings  of  the  New  Testament  are  not  by  the 
authors  whoso  names  they  bear.  Without  entering  into  Dr. 
Scholten's  arguments  in  detail,  we  may  say  of  bis  method  that  it 
has  this  fatal  defect :  he  infers  from  the  silence  of  certain  early 
writers  on  certain  books  of  the  New  Testament  that  such  books 
had  no  existence  whatever.  He  seems  to  forget  that  their  exist- 
ence was  assumed  as  a  matter  of  universal  consent.  The  point 
of  Teschendorf's  excellent  little  work,  to  which  this  is  a  reply — 
that  there  is  abundant  external  historical  testimony  from  the  last 
quarter  of  the  first  century  in  favor  of  the  early  origin  of  all  the 
Gospels— still  remains  unrefuted.  To  all  into  whose  hands  this 
book  may  fall  we  commend  a  reperusal  of  the  volume  which 
has  provoked  it,  and  also  of  Hofstede  de  Groot's  little  volume  on 
Basilides,  as  the  first  witness  for  the  age  and  authority  of  the 
Nov/  Testament  writings,  and  especially  of  John's  Gospel. 


Das  Buck  tier  Richter.  Mi;  besouderer  Riicksicht  auf  die  Geschichte  seiner  Ausle- 
gung  und  Kirchlichcn  Venvendung.  (The  Book  of  Judges.  With  special  regard 
to  the  History  of  its  Exposition  and  Ecclesiastical  Application.)  Yon  Dr.  Jo- 
hannes Bachm an.     Svo.,  pp.  vi,  2  12.    Berlin :  Wiegandt und Grieben.  1SG3. 

This  is  the  first  elaborate  attempt,  since  the  works  of  Osiauder 
(Tubingen,  1GS2)  and  Sebastian  Schmid,  (Strasburg,  16S4,)  to 
explain  the  Book  of  Judges  from  a  decidedly  ecclesiastical  stand- 
point. Dr.  Bachmann  has  therefore  an  essentially  different  ob- 
ject from  Keil  (18G3)  and  Paul  Cassell,  (lSGo,)  as  he  does  not 
confine  himself  strictly  to  an  cxegetical  interpretation  of  Judges, 
but  bears  in  mind  as  well  its  historical,  theological,  and  ecclesi- 
astical relations.  He  divides  this  first  installment  of  his  work  into 
two  parts,  the  first  being  an  examination  of  the  scope  and  extent 
of  the  period  of  the  Judges,  the  position  and  importance  of  this 
period  in  the  history  of  the  Old  Testament,  the  political  ami 
religions  condition  of  Israel  during  the  Judges,  and  the  chronol- 
ogy of  the  period.  The  second  part  begins  with  an  introduction 
(pp.  77-8t3)  to  the  commentary  proper,  in  which  the  views  of 
numerous  exegetical  writers  on  the  dates  and  events  described  in 
Judges  are  carefully  sifted.  One  of  tin'  mooted  questions  is  1 1 : <- 
exact  date  o(  the  events  recounted  in  the  first  chapter  of  Judges. 
A  number  of  Catholic  expositors,  and  recently  Hengstenberg, 
place  all  of  them  in  the  life-time  of  Joshua,  Dr.  Bachmann  enters 
fully  into  this  question,  and  decides  that  a  portion  of  these  events 
took  place  after  Joshua's  death.  The  most  plausible  ground 
which  he  gives  is,  that  the  general  condition  of  the  people  in  the 


18G9.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  465 

first  chapter  of  Judges  is  that  of  a  people  without  a  head.  The 
commentary  opens  with  a  parallel  between  the  beginnings  of  the 
Books  of  Joshua  and  Judges.  The  former  commences  with  an 
account  of  the  death  of  Moses,  and  the  latter  with  one  of  Joshua. 
After  the  death  of  Moses  the  Lord  speaks  to  Joshua,  but  after 
the  death  of  Joshua  the  children  of  Israel  inquire  of  the  Lord. 
The  beginning  of  Joshua  refers  to  the  essential  equality  of  the 
period  of  Joshua  with  the  Mosaic,  of  which  it  is  a  conclusion ; 
but  in  the  beginning  of  Judges  we  find  a  broad  chasm  between 
the  closing  of  one  period  and  the  dawn  of  the  new  one.  In  the 
former  God  continues  his  revelation  uninterruptedly,  but  in  the 
latter  there  is  a  period  of  quiescence,  which  calls  out  more 
strongly  than  ever  the  human  activity  of  the  people. 

The  work  gives  promise  of  being  a  valuable  contribution  to 
exegetical  theology.  We  must  withhold  an  opinion  on  it  as  a 
commentary  until  the  other  parts  shall  have  made  their  appear- 
ance, for  the  present  only  takes  us  through  the  first  three  chap- 
ters of  Judges.  Of  the  publishers,  Messrs.  Wiegandt  and  Grie- 
ben,  we  cannot  speak  too  highly.  They  publish  an  excellent 
class  of  works,  and  are  one  of  the  unhappily  small  class  in  Ger- 
many who  will  issue  nothing  but  evangelical  books.  We  wish 
all  publishers  had  as  much  conscience  in  their  acceptance  of  MSS. 
for  publication. 


History,  Biograp7iyi  and  Topography. 

Chips  from  a  German  WorksTioj).     By  Max  MoLLElt,  M.  A.,  Fellow  of  All  Souls 
College,   Oxford.     Vol.  I,  Essays  on  the  Science  of  Religion.    Vol.  Tl.   I 
on  Mythology,  Traditions,  and  Customs.     12mo.  In  two  volumes,  pp.  371,  402. 
New  York:  Charles  Scribner  &  Co. 

Some  fourteen  hundred  years  before  the  blessed  Advent,  near 
the  epoch  when  Moses  was  leading  forth  the  Exodus  and  com- 
posing the  Pentateuch,  the  Aryan  race,  residing  upon  the  table- 
lands east  of  the  Caspian,  were  pouring  forth  those  rhythmical 
compositions  which  formed  both  their  psalm  book  and  bible,  and 
which  have  come  down  to  the  present  age  under  the  title  oi^  the 
Rig- Veda.  This  fact  has  a  stirring  interest  to  us  and  the  peoples 
of  modern  Europe;  for  these  Aryans  were  kin  with  us, as  sons  of 
Japhet;  and  in  fact  this  very  word  veda  -akin  with  the  Crock 
oida,  and  (by  an  interchange  of  v  and  w)  with  <"if,  tcist,  and 
<f.om— is  radically  an  English  word.  This  Rig- Veda  or  Song-tore^ 
in  a  racial  point  of  view,  is  our  bible;  and,  in  placing  ourselves 
under  the  guidance  of  the  Hebrew  canon,  we  are  Japhet  sitting 


4CG  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  {July. 

in  the  tents  of  Shem,     But  Japhet,  though  physiologically  far 

the  more  manly  race,  is  less  intuitive  and  spiritual,  and  hence 
he  was  not  chosen  to  be  the  official  exponent  of  the  Infinite,  or 
the  progenitor  of  the  Incarnate.  The  Veda,  though  intensely 
interesting  as  the  natural  and  simple  utterance  of  the  childhood 
of  our  race,  and  furnishing  a  few  specimens  of  lofty  and  devout 
inspiration,  is  for  the  must  part  a  mere  mass  of  earthly  and  sec- 
ular twaddle,  the  prattle  not  only  of  childhood  but  of  childish- 
ness. The  body,  of  one  thousand  and  twenty-eight  songs,  is  not, 
like  the  Old  Testament,  impregnated  with  God,  and  it  is  only  a 
rare  exception  that  rises  into  companionship  with  the  Psalms  of 
David,  or  tells  of  immortality  and  retribution. 

The  Aryan  had  not  yet  produced  that  class  of  composition  in 
which  Japhet's  genius  has  since  shone  so  resplendently— accu- 
rate consecutive  history,  reproducing  to  the  present  the  realities 
of  the  past.  So  that  we  know  with  little  distinctness  when  it 
was  that  the  Aryan  adjourned  from  his  first  known  abode  into 
India.  Xor  can  we  trace  how,  from  the  primitive  simplicity  of 
the  Yedie  theology,  there  arose,  under  the  name  of  Brahmanism, 
the  most  iron  hierarchy  the  world  has  ever  known.  Talk  of 
American  slavery  ris  caste;  talk  of  feudalism,  papacy,  any  thing 
elsewhere  in  history  !  These  were  all  democracies  compared 
with  this  most  intensified  gradation  of  despotisms.  Underneath 
the  whole  structure,  of  course,  lay  the  luckless  "  colored  man," 
not  only  as  "  nigger  *'  but  as  reptile  and  devil ;  against  whom 
hatred  most  diabolical  was  a  divine  duty,  and  imprecations  were 
chanted  as  divinely  inspired. 

At  length  against  this  despotism  a  protest  arose.  More  than 
five  hundred  years  before  Christ,  Sakya-Muni,  a  beautiful  young 
prince  of  India,  was  from  his  childhood  endowed  with  a  won- 
derful insight  into  the  perfect  unreality  of  earthly  things.  Prince- 
dom, power,  beauty,  wealth,  he  saw  to  be,  as  they  are,  momentary, 
shadowy,  vanishing,  nothing.  And  that  same  powerfully  intui- 
tive eye  that  so  vividly  knew  this  nothing,  sought,  with  earnest- 
ness and  ceaseless  unrest,  for  the  Reality.  It  perpetually  asked 
that  solemn  question,  put  by  a  brother  Aryan,  in  a  later  aj 
the  divine  Shcmite,  What  is  trutii?  Six  years  In1  subjected 
himself  undo- the  iron  ritualism  of  the  Brahmans,  and  decided 
that  ritualism  could  not  disclose  the  divine  secret,  lie  resorted 
to  the  severest  fastings,  but  found  that  though  mortifications 
could  subdue  the  passions  and  clarify  the  intellect  they  could 
disclose  no  revelation.  At  length  the  day  came.  It  was  n  |f 
that,  like  Wesley,  his   "heart  was  strangely  warmed"  by  the 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  467 

divine  fire,  but  his  head  was  illumined  by  the  divine  light,  and 
his  eye  looked  straight  upon  Truth,  and  saw  it  ! !  Thereby,  no 
longer  a  doubter,  an  inquirer,  he  became  a  Buddha,  a  boder  or 
hnower /  for  here,  too,  we  have  an  English  word,  bode,  (as  in  fore- 
Jo^,)  but  in  the  stronger  sense  of  know,  lie  sprang  forth — a 
preacher;  fascinating  and  eloquent,  unsurpassed  by  anyWhitefield 
or  Summerlield,  gathering  crowds  of  hearers,  thousands  of  fol- 
lowers, menacing  Brahmanism  with  overthrow,  and  promising  to 
become  the  sole  apostle  and  prophet  of  India.  After  having 
yielded  for  long  years,  Brahmanism  at  last  made  an  overwhelming 
rally,  and  drove  Buddhism  from  India,  to  spread  over  Eastern  Asia, 
winning  and  partially  elevating  one  third  of  the  human  race. 

The  doctrines  which  so  magnetized  and  still  entrance  these 
millions  recognize  no  supreme  personal  God  of  all,  and  as  the 
highest  boon  for  the  most  perfect  piety  promise  the  attainment 
of — annihilation !  The  Buddha,  Sakya-Muni,  saw  a  universal 
fatalistic  system  in  existence,  ruled  with  a  most  complex  system 
of  necessary  laws.  In  that  system  all  phenomenal  existence  was 
synonymous  with  misery,  and  release  from  existence  was  the 
highest  attainment.  Why  not  then  commit  suicide?  Alas,  that 
would  produce  only  a  change,  not  a  termination  of  being — a  leap 
from  the  frying-pan  into  the  tire.  For  then  we  should  only  trans- 
migrate, through  various  animal  forms,  during  the  ages,  our 
moral  imperfections  producing  bodily  deformities  and  degrada- 
tions. The  only  escape  was  Nirvana — the  blowing  out,  as  of  a 
candle.  Yet  whether  the  Buddha  really  taught  actual  annihila- 
tion is  a  greatly  debated  query  among  the  Sanscrit  masters. 
Max  3Iuller  takes  the  affirmative;  hut  also  maintains  that  his 
'disciples,  unable  to  endure  the  awful  dogma,  subsequently  trans- 
lated Nirvana  into  blissful  quietude.  The  truth  may  be,  that  as 
Herbert  Spencer  maintains  that  his  Unknown  Absolute  po 
not  intelligence,  but  may  possess  some  inconceivable  attribute 
infinitely  superior  to  intelligence,  so  Nirvana  may  utterly  exclude 
existence,  but  include  an  inconceivable  something  infinitely  supe- 
rior to  existence!  But  as  it  toot  the  enlightened  eye  of  Buddha 
himself  to  cognize  this  Nirvana,  probably  no  human  language 
could  convey  it  to  ordinary  mortal  conception.  It  is  vain  then  to 
discuss;  no  one  can  understand  Nirvana  until  he  attains  the 
Buddhic  eye  and  sees  it. 

Even  in  the  primitive  ages,  before  the  Aryans  migrated  from 
their  northern  home,  there  arose  the  sect  of  Zarathrusta  or  Zoro- 
aster, Avho  aspired  to  a  lofter  theism  and  a  more  spiritual  religion 
than  was  taught  by  the  Vedio  faith.     They  too  can  be  tra© 


40 S  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

descending  into  India,  and  thence  moving  eastward  into  Persia, 
where  they  became  the  predominant,  sect.  They  separated  from 
the  primitive  stock  later  than  the  sections  M'ho  migrated  west- 
ward to  form  the  future  natioirs  of  Europe,  whose  sons  we  are  ;  for 
their  language,  the  Zend,  is  a  nearer  sister  of  the  Sanscrit  than 
any  European  tongue.  These  spiritual  religionists  were  severely 
orthodox,  for  they  use  the  names  of  the  Vedic  gods  to  designate 
their  devils.  Their  sacred  canon,  the  Zend  Avesta,  is  still  extant 
in  a  form  more  or  less  authentic,  containing  the  doctrines  of  the 
Zoroastrians,  though  not  the.  work  of  Zoroaster.  The  fancy  of 
the  Aryan  was  ever  fascinated  with  the  element  of  Light,  and 
thence  the  Zoroastrian  held  it,  in  the  form  of  flame  and  fire, to  be  the 
emblem  and  essence  of  the  good  and  the  divine,  in  profound  con- 
trast with  Darkness,  the  identical  of  evil.  And  this  duality  is  the 
very  soul  of  the  ancient  Persian  heathendom. 

Fifty  years  ago  not  a  line  of  the  vast  literature  embraced  in  the 
sacred  books  of  the  Brahmans,  the  Buddhists,  and  the  Zoroastri- 
ans, the  three  great  Aryan  religions,  could  be  read  by  any  Euro- 
pean scholar.  The  learned  Frenchman,  Eugene Burnouf,  was  the 
founder  of  the  Zend  philology.  In  1846  a  young  German  at- 
tended the  lectures  of  Burnouf,  and  was  fired  with  the  ambition 
to  make  it  his  life-task  to  strike  to  the  fountain  head,  and  trans- 
late the  entire  Rig- Veda;  a  work  requiring  a  stupendous  amount 
of  study,  labor,  and  expense,  to  result  in  six  thousand  pages  of 
quarto,  of  which  not  a  hundred  copies  were  likely  to  be  sold. 
Coming  to  London,  by  the  mediation  of  Chevalier  Bunsen,  the 
Board  of  Directors  of  the  East  India  Company  nobly  under- 
took to  defray  the  expense,  and  our  young  German,  Max  Muller, 
set  himself  to  work.  Four  volumes  were  completed  in  1862. 
"  Now,"  said  Bunsen  to  the  young  laborer,  "  you  have  got  a  work 
for  life.  But  mind,  let  us  have  from  time  to  time  some  chips  from 
your  workshop."  These  volumes,  sent  us  by  our  friend  Scribner, 
are  the  result  of  these  occasional  furnishings;  and  two  baskets 
full  of  more  nutritious  "chips"  it  has  seldom  been  our  lot  to 
nibble. 

The  Vedas,  though  almost  adored  by  the  Brahman  and  his  ad- 
herents, as  embodying  the  divine  mind  and  insuring  salvation  to 
those  who  study  them,  have  been  seldom  found  in  India,  and  arc 
generally  unread  even  by  the  priest  who  found  their  authority 
upon  them.  It  is  ■.<  wonder  t<<  the  Hindoos  themselves  that  their 
sacred  books,  their  sole  absolute  authority  in  religion,  are  better 
understood  on  the  Thames  than  by  the  (binges.  The  western 
Japhet  is  altogether  ahead  of  his  eastern  brother.    The  pcopl< 


18G9.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  409 

mutter  the  Vedic   hymns  by  pure  unintelligent  rote,  while  the 

listening  European  scholar  alone  recognizes  the  sacred  syllables 
of  three  thousand  years  ago.  And,  what  is  mora  to  the  point, 
the  missionary,  like  Luther,  is  able  to  appeal  to  the  sacred  text 
in  condemnation  of  the  present  tenets  and  practices  of  the  Church. 
He  has  amazed  the  pundits  by  showing  thai  neither  caste,  nor 
prohibition  of  second  femalen  arriages,  nor  widow-burning,  have, 
even  by  their  own  standard,  any  divine  authority. 

Max  Miiller  studies  and  writes  of  philology  as  a  handmaid  to 
what  he  considers  the  most  important  of  all  histories,  the  history 
of  religion  in  all  its  forms  throughout  the  human  race.  In  accord- 
ance with  the  views  of  our  best  Anninian  doctors,  Episcopius, 
Curcellaeus,  Wesley,  and  Fletcher,  he  holds  that  elements  of  truth 
pervade  the  world,  and  that  every  probationary  being  has  his  light 
and  his  possibility  of  salvation.  Of  his  erudition,  his  eloquence, 
and  his  noble  spirit  we  have  spoken  fully  and  freely  in  former 
notices.  These  qualities  make  their  full  display  in  these  fascinat- 
ing pages.  _______ 

Prehistoric  Notions ;  or,  Inquiries  Concerning  some  of  the  Croat  Peoples  and  Civil- 
izations of  Antiquity,  and  their  Probable  Relation  to  a  still  Older  Civilization 
of  the  Ethiopians  or  Cushites  of  Arabia.  l)y  John  D.  Baldwin,  A.  M.  TJiuo., 
pp.  -11  •£.     New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers.    lSC'j. 

Mr.  Baldwin  belongs  not  to  the  Xiebuhr  school  of  historical 
criticism,  but  to  the  grandest  order  of  the  Bunsen  chronologists. 
Rejecting  with  disdain  the  Darv  iuian  deduction  of  humanity  from 
moukeydom,  he  nevertheless  accepts  the  theory  of  human  develop- 
ment through  the  longest,  geological  ages;  ages,  however,  not  so 
much  of  dreary  anthropoid  degradation  as  of  lengthened  and 
magnificent  civilization.  ]]<■  is  cheerful  and  genial  in  temper. 
The  only  creature  he  utterly  hates  and  expectorates  upon  is  the 
"impious"  race  of  Biblical' commentators,  who  mendaciously 
protend  that  there  is  any  chronology  whatever  in  the  sacred  text. 
Having  exterminated  this  vile  species  of  ccphalopods,  with  all  their 
chronological  romances,  he  has  no  issuo  with  the  Bible  ov  r<  li 
ami  utters  not  one  irreverent  word  thai  we  have  found  of  either. 
Having  overleaped  these  narrow  and  factitious  limits, he  springs 
forth,  like  a  wing  footed  steed,  ramping  over  the  vasl  and  magnifi- 
cent expanse  of  historical  eternities,  lie  measures  you  oft" 
and  :eons  with  all  tin-  facility  of  a  dry  goods  clerk,  knowing  that 
he  has  the  amplesl  resources  behind  him. 

His  method  may  be  illustrated  by  the  instance  of  Egypt.  The 
monuments  verified   by  Manetho  carry  us  vast  ages  beyond  the 

Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXL— SO 


470  Methodist  Quarterly  Rem  [July, 

Ushcrian  epoch  of  creation.  But  the  first  monuments  demonstrate 
a  proud  civilization,  requiring  antecedent  ages  of  development  since 
the  historical  cities  of  Egypt  were  founded.  But  these  historical 
cities  are  based  upon  the  surface  of  an  alluvium  which  has  required 
long  geological  ages  to  deposit;  and  these  deposits,  when  perfo- 
rated, reveal  proofs  of  civilized  inhabitants  down  to  the  very 
bottom  of  the  series  of  alluvial  layers.  There  need,  therefore,  be 
no  minute  quarrel  between  the  Hebrew  and  Septuagint  chronolo- 
gies. Egypt  has  been  humanly  inhabited  during  the  large  share 
of  the  tertiary  period.  And  this  process  of  calculation  can  be 
repeated  with  variations  upon  most  sections  of  the  globe.  He 
can  run  us  back  through  the  historical  period  ;  then  back  through 
the  mythological  period,  which,  however  nebulous, 'is  still  the 
shadow  of  true  history;  and  finish  off  with  the  iron,  brass,  and 
stone  ages  of  geological  man. 

Your  Bible  Dictionary  will  tell  you  that  Tyre  is  one  of  the 
most  ancient  cities  of  the  world.  But  Mr.  Baldwin  will  further 
tell  you  how  little  aware  these  dictionary  gentlemen  are  that 
before  Tyre  was  born  Sidon  had  had  ages  of  growth,  ages  of 
zenith,  and  ages  of  decline.  Then  bach  of  Sidon,  Berytus,  the 
modern  Beyroot,  had  its  threefold  ages.  And  back  of  Berytus 
was  the  old  dynasty  of  Joppa,  whose  king  was  Kepheus,  the 
grandfather  of  ages. 

And  these  Phoenicians  were  a  part  of  that  great  vEthiopic  or 
Ctishite  race,  which  is  Mr.  Baldwin's  special  favorite,  the  flower 
and  glory  of  the  prehistoric  ages.  This  illustrious  progeny,  be 
sure,  are  no  negroes — though  Mr.  Baldwin  launches  a  lightning 
fork  at  all  defenders  of  slavery — but  of  a  stately  ruddy  race. 
And  the  term  JEthiop  does  not.  signify  burnt  face,  (as  Mr.  Blyden 
lately  told  our  readers,)  but  bright  face,  and  indicates  the  true 
Caucasian  bloom.  The  genetic  center  of  these,  glorious  Cushites 
was  Central  Arabia;  but  thence  they  spread,  and  covering  the 
large  share  of  the  globe,  left  the  magnificent  monuments  of  their 
genius  and  power  in  those  stupendous  architectures  that  have  been 
the  uniinilated  problems  and  wonders  of  all  historic  ages.  These 
architectures  have  lately  been  disclosed  l>\  Mr.  Palgrave,as  noM 
standing  in  solitary  state  in  Central  Arabia;  a  region,  until  his 
visit,  supposed  to  have  been  a  blank  desert.  Bui  they  are  known 
in  Greece  as  Cyclopean;  in  Ceylon,  in  Syria,  in  Egypt;  and  in 
Britain  as  the  Stouehenge.  Sometimes  we  have  magnificenl  tem- 
ples carved, as Canova carved  a  statue,  from  the  single  Bolid  rock. 
Sometimes  they  are  gigantic  nms.-es  of  rock,  piled  up  into 
structures  by  machines   unknown  to  modern  art.     Of  all   tl 


1869.]  Quarterly  Booh-Talle.  471 

history  famishes  no  record;  and  they  bear  tokens  of  existence 
earlier  than  any  historic  commencement. 

Antiquity  appears  to  have  begun 
Long  after  their  primeval  race  was  run. 

And  now,  what  can  the  commentators  (for  Ave  belong,  alas !  to 
that  irredeemable  race)  say  to  all  these  disclosures?  Or,  how 
have  we  the  heart  to  disperse  to  the  winds  Mr.  Baldwin's  ara- 
besque air-castles?  Above  all,  how  could  we,  with  relentless 
steel  pen  and  slaughterous  ink-shed, endure  to  exterminate  this  won- 
derful race  of  prehistoric  white-faced  ^Ethiopians?  Our  compunc- 
tions are,  indeed,  somewhat  soothed  by  the  apparent  possibilities 
that  they  never  had  any  existence;  and  that  after  all,  the  only 
really  used-up  man  might  be  Mr.  Baldwin,  who  seems  to  be  the 
actual  Adam  in  whom  this  whole  race  is  seminally  concentrated, 
and  in  whom  they  must  live  or  die. 

If  any  patient  of  our.'-,  however,  were  bitten  by  Mr.  Baldwin's 
theory,  and  the  virus  were  taking  dangerously,  we  might,  i'ov  the 
nonce,  pursue  the  following  treat  mi  Tit  :  First,  for  the  primary  geo- 
logical paroxysm  a  i^w  of  Dr.  Jewell's  an ti- geological  pills,  :m  in- 
stallment of  which  was  done  up  in  a  late  number  of  our  Quar- 
terly. For  the  mythological  stage  we  would  give  a  few  doses  of 
Max  Miiller's  philological  analyses,  showing  how  easily  whole 
groups  of  myths  have  been  formed  out  of  etymologies  and  meta- 
phors. As  for  the  Egyptological  period,  Sir  Cornwall  Lewis  might 
furnish  a  few  febrifuges.  As  to  the  dim  twilight  of  written  semi- 
history  a  little  more  Max  ;  forinstance,  the  following  prescription  : 

To  extract   consecutive  history  from  these  re-collect  ions  is   simplyi  mpos 
All  is  vague,  contradictory,  miraculous,  al<  u  J.       C 

of  which  few  only  of  the  anci  had  any  oouception. 

Nov.-  and  then,  it  is  true,  one  ira  'S  certain  periods  and  landn 

but  in  the  next  pago  all  is  chaos  again.     Itmaybodiffi  9  that  with  all 

the  traditions  of  thi  earlj  migrations  of  C  Tops  and  Danaus  into  Gr& 
Homeric  poems  of  the  Trojan  War.  aud  the  gem  aucient  dynas 

Greece,  we  know  nothing  of  Greek  history  before  the  i 
even  then.     Y(t  Ote  t 

of  this  ,. 

T'ne  same  applies  with  a  force  increased  a  buudrcdfi 
the  aboriginal  races  of  America,  and  I  '1  the  better 

for  the  credit  of  American  scholars.     Rv      the  trad  Lions  of  I 

Ghichimu:  -  which  form  t;.  .  American  am 

rians,  are  no  better  than  I 

an(j  ;■-  ;.     ■/  i    .■   .    .,    waste  of  time  to  construct  out  of 
history 

And  as  for  the  extent  of  real  human  history,  which  a  healthy 
belief,  tempered  with  a  healthy  skepticism,  can  accept,  take  the 
following  dose  of  B  writer  perfectly  familiar  with   all  the  most 


472  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

modern  developments  from  the  various  ancient  inscription.?,  Dr. 
George  Rawlinson : 

On  the  whole,  it  would  seem  that  no  profane  history  of  an  authentic  chai 
mounts  up  to  an  earlier  date  than  the  twenty-seventh  or  twenty-eighth  century 
before  Christ.      Egyptian  history  begins  about  B.  C.  2700 ;  Chinese,  perhaps,  in 
B.C.  2637;  Babylonian  B.C.  245S;  Assyrian  in  B.  C.  1273;  Greek,  with  the  Tro- 
jan War.  B.C.  1250,  or,  perhaps  with  Hercules,  a  century  earlier:  Lydian  in  B.  C. 
1229;  Phoenician  ab  >ut  the  same  peri  >d;  Carthaginian  in  L.  C.  880;  Macedonian 
about  B.  0.  720 ;  Median  not  befor     IS.  C.  70S;   Roman  i    the  middle  of  the  same 
century;  Persian  in  B.  ('.  558;   tndian  about  B.  0.  350;   Mexican  and  Peruvian 
not  until  after  our  era.     The  oldest  human  constructions  remaining  upon  the  earth 
pve  the  Pyramids,  and  these  dale  fn  m  about  B.  C.  L' : 0 0 :    the  brick  tem] 
Babylonia  seem,  none  of  them,    earlier  than  B.  V.  2300;   B.  C.  2000   would  be  a 
high   date   for    the    first  Cyclopean  walls  iu  Greece-  or  Italy ;   the  earliest  rock 
inscriptions  belong  to  nearly  the  same  period.     If  man  has  existed  upon  the  earth 
ten  or  twenty  thousand  years,  as  M.  Bunsen  supposes,  why  has  lie  left  no  ~\ 
of  himself  till  within  the  last  live  thousand  years?  * 

We  do  not  say  that  these  furnish  the  last  words  on  this  sub- 
ject. Religion  and  history  can  calmly  wait  the  most  ultimate 
researches.  We  may, perhaps, bequeath  the  discussion  to  investi- 
gators yet  unborn.  Yet  we  can  afford  to  feel  that  the  conclusion 
will  leave  the  foundations  of  a  devout  religious  faith  undisturbed. 
And  so,  for  aught  we  know,  thinks  Mr.  Baldwin. 


Literature  emcl  Fiction. 


The    Gates  Ajar.      By  Elizabeth  Stuart  Phelps.     16mo.,  pp.  24.8.     Boston: 
Fields,  Osgood,  £  Co. 

Are  we  to  be  fitted  fur  the  future  heaven,  or  is  the  future  heaven 
to  be  precisely  adjusted  to  us?  Smitten  by  the  sudden  loss  of  her 
beloved  brother  Roy,  -Mis.  Phelps  seems  to  require  that  God,  upon 
penalty  of  forfeiting  Ins  character  for  goodness,  restore  hi)/)  to  lur 
pure  human  affections,  and  will  not  consent  to  be  so  reconstructed 
as  to  become  supremely  blessed  on  a  higher  than  the  sisterly  plane. 
Heaven  must  be  suited  to  he);  am)  to  her  present  mood ;  not.  site 
to  a  transcendent  sphere,  and  far  more  glorious  moods.  She 
writes  this  beautiful  parable  to  show  that  heaven  is  the  renewal  of 
our  present,  feelings,  with  their  due  gratifications,  in  a  more  perfect 
state.  There  will  be  the  jest  and  the  laugh,  the  arts  and  the 
graces,  the  fields  and  the  houses,  with  all  the  tender  related  affec- 
tions, with  their  more  perfect  gratifications. 

♦The  "lent  weapons  hi  the  drift,"  and  Mr.  Horner1  ottory,  will  be 

said  to  he  such  vestiges.     But  the  extremely  doubtful  i  h<    ; 

well  shown  bv  the  "  Quarterly  ltaviow,"  (No.  210,  ] 

former  as  ovi'dence  of  extreme  human  nntiquity  inusi   depend  en  two  qui 
neither  of  which  has  yet  been  solved.     1.  Axe  thoy  of  tl 
tion  in  which  they  are  found?  and  2.  Is  that  formation  itself  of  an  ontiqoi 
remote?     It  has  Leen  clearly  shown  by  a  writcrin  "  Blackwood's  M  i  ,; 

MO,  pp.  422-439,)  that  the  high  antiquity  of  the  drift  is  at  anj  rate  "  not  proven. 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  473 

How  all  this  can  be  fully  carried  out  she  Tails  to  show.  Grant 
that  her  brother  will  be  restored  to  her.  But  Tor  that  saintly  widow 
of  a  depraved  husband  and  mother  oT  live  depraved  children  de- 
ceased, what  comfort  has  this  parable  ?  All  the  fibers  of  her  human 
affections  tie  Iter  to  the  children  of  sin  and  hell.  For  her  we  must 
furnish  either  Universal  isni,  or  the  doctrine  of  a  substitution  of 
higher  affections  than  belonged  to  her  earthly  relationships.  And 
how  many  of*  us  are  there  whose  affections  of  marriage  or  con- 
sanguinity would. not  demand  the  admission  oT  some  one  of  the 
finally  wicked  into  heaven  ? 

Mrs.  Phelps  seems  to  evade  these  difficulties,  and  triumphantly 
flaunts  her  brilliant  heresies  into  the  face  of  her  village  Church, 
frightening  the  Deacon  and  getting  preached  at  by  the  Minister, 
so  as  to  raise  a  very  lively  ferment  in  the  little  flock  of  orthodoxy. 
It  is  even  asserted  in  the  advertisements  that  her  book  is  under  the 
orthodox  ban,  and  so  is  glorified  with  the  honors,  not  only  of 
heterodoxy,  but  of  virtual  martyrdom.  This  clever  play-off  of 
heresy  and  martyrdom,  however,  is  all  a  skillful  Yankee  device. 
Mrs.  Phelps  has  slyly  inserted  in  the  very  center  of  her  book  a 
proviso  which  amply  saves  its  orthodoxy  by  solving  the  mysteries 
of  her  parable.  For  what  is  the  meaning  of  these  palaces,  and 
parlors,  and  pianos,  and  pictures,  and  poetries,  and  puns  in  heaven? 
"I  don't  suppose  (p.  144)  that  the  houses  will  be  made,  of  oak  and 
pine  nailed  together,  Tor  instance.  But  I  hope  Tor  heavenly  types 
of  nature  and  art.  Something  that  will  be  to  its  what  these  are 
now?  O  that  is  it,  then;  in  the  author's  own  italics.  So  that, 
after  all,  all  she  means  is,  thai  a  higher  Roy  may  come  to  her  higher 
affections.  Now  had  Mrs.  P.  frankly  told  the  Deacon  and  the 
Minister  this,  she  would  have  saved  them  from  their  horrors ;  but 
her  book  would  have  lost  perhaps  some  notoriety,  and  have  gone 
into  a  very  quiet  public  acceptance  as  a  beautiful  but  not  perfectly 
consistent  apologue. 

Yet  we  thank  Mrs.  P.  i'^r  thus  tenderly  impressing  upon  us  the 
feeling  that  we  arc  Mil!  to  be  human  in  heaven.  We  have  in- 
herited  from  our  Methodist  fathers  a  human  Jesus,  a  human  heav- 
en, a  humanized  religion.  We  thank  Mrs.  Phelps  for  illustrating  to 
the  popular  feeling  how  beautifully  the  human  heart  demands  the 
Divine-human  now  and  forever.  Our  Puritan  friends  might  have 
learned  this  mellow  humanenc  -  of  piety,  if  not  from  \\  esle) ,  a!  least 
from  Whitefield.  Mr.  Wakeley,  in  his  Wesloy  Anecdotes,  (uoticed 
on  another  page)  tells  the  story  in  effect  as  follows:  A  narrow- 
hearted  Calvinist  asked  Mr.  Whitefield  if  ho  expected  ever  I 
John  Wesley  in  heaven.    Yes,  replied  the  great-hearted  Calvinist, 


4:74:  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

unless  lie  is  so  near  the  throne  that  I  cannot  get  sight  of  him.  We 
cannot,  therefore,  conoede  to  Mrs.  P.  any  consistent  claim  to  het- 
erodoxy. We  do  not  allow  her  the  penalty  she  inflicts  on  Dr. 
Bland's  sermon. 


My  Recollections  of  Lord  Byron,  and  those  of  the  Eye-witnesses  of  his  Life.  By 
the  Countess  Gdiccioli.  l2mo.,  pp.  670.  New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers. 
1869. 

To  Byron  neither  the  literary  nor  religious  world  has  done  any 
injustice.  His  rare  gifts,  his  noble  birth,  his  disastrous  career,  are 
all  understood.  His  imperial  ideality,  his  exquisite  sense  and  power 
of  painting  even  moral  beauty,  the  unaffected  sadness  that  he 
breathes  through  the  productions  of  his  genius,  who  does  not 
feel ':'  We  place  him  in  the  first  rank  of  English  poets.  But  then 
can  genius,  with  till  its  gifts  and  fascinations,  reverse  the  eternal  laws 
of  truth  and  righteousness?  The  last  sad  fact  in  the  history  of  his 
moral  being  is  this:  that  the  defender  of  his  Christian  and  consci- 
entious character  is  the  Italian  woman  with  whom  he  lived  years 
of  adultery. 


Periodicals. 

Annual  Report  of  fke  Boston  Theological  Seminary,  1SG0.  Riverside  Press.  1SC9. 
Catalogue  and  Circular  of  the  Garrett  Biblical  Institute,  Evanston.  Illinois.  October, 
•     1SGS.     Chicago.     1868. 

Catalogue  of  ike  Drew  Theological  Seminary,  Madison,  N.  J.,  1SG9. 
It  is  a  significant  fact,  that  as  soon  as  a  number  of  eminent  lay- 
men came  into  council  on  the  subject  there  was  a  very  hearty  con- 
currence in  the  policy  of  establishing  schools  of  Christian  learning 
for  the  educating  of  our  future  ministry.  On  this  subject  we  ever 
believed  that  our  people  was  quite  abreast  with,  if  not  ahead  of,  our 
ministry.  Our  hearers  were  not  much  better  satisfied  with  our 
extant  preaching  than  the  preachers  themselves.  Still,  it  is  with 
earnest  solicitude  that  our  ministry  and  laity  reflect  on  the  fact  that 
we  are  making  anew  the  experiment  whether  a  scholarly  ministry 
can  be  a  truly  stirring  popular  ministry.  "We  cannot,  indeed,  do 
our  part  in  resisting  the  incoming  tide  of  scholarly  infidelity  without 
furnishing  the  means  of  the  highest  religious  and  theological  scholar- 
ship. We  musi  haven  class  of  profound  Christian  scholars  as  writ- 
ers and  professors.  But  scholastici  m  in  the  pulpit  i<  forever  feeble 
and  unpopular.  An  over-drilled  and  thoroughly  manufactured  min- 
istry lose9  its  popular  power.  Even  our  most  intelligent  people 
always  will  prefer  an  untrained  yet  gifted  preacher,  warm  with 
his  first  love,  in  whom  religion  is  a  reality  and  a  power,  rather 


1809.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  -175 

than  a  titled  B.D.  or  D.I).  with  whom  it  is  a  profound  ab- 
straction and  a  most  accurate  science.  It  is  a  ruinous  bargain 
if,  for  theological  erudition,  we  barter  away  our  popular  power. 
We  had  better  transform  our  theological  schools  into  orphan 
asylums. 

There  are,  we  think,  against  this  result,  three  important  precau- 
tions, well  realized  by  our  present  professors.  The  first  is,  the 
cultivation  of  the.  highest  tone  of  piety;  the  second  is,  the  engaging 
in  the  active  work  of  the  ministry  during  the  course;  and  the 
third  is,  the  uncompromising  maintenance  of  the  preaching,  as  a 
lawyer  pleads  and  a  senator  harangues,  without  manuscript.  On 
the  first  point  our  earnest  doctrine  of  entire  consecration  should 
rule,  as  we  believe  it  does,  in  our  seminaries  in  supreme  practical 
and  revival  power.  On  the  second  point,  a  great  advantage  it  is 
that  our  seminaries  be  really  or  virtually,  as  we  believe  that  of 
Boston  is,  in  the  heart  of  a  great  city,  where  the  active,  popular 
work  of  exhorting,  preaching,  and  revivals  shall  both  keep  the  soul 
alive  and  spread  the  ruling  power  of  the  institution  over  the  city. 
Heathen  missioning,  a  plenty  of  it,  might  be  found  a  few  blocks 
from  the  seminary  halls.  On  the  third  point,  particularly  empha- 
sized at  the  Drew,  the  example  and  precept  of  all  our  princes  ::i 
Israel,  our  bishops,  our  professors,  and  our  eminent  doctors,  should 
be  exclusively,  as  it  is  mainly,  on  the  side  of  extemporaneous 
preaching. 

"We  cannot  quite  agree  with  those  who  would  abolish  those 
titles  of  reverence  which  ever  seemed  to  us  so  becoming  to  many 
past  great  men  of  the  Christian  Church.  The  prefixes  which  the 
Christian  ages  have  furnished  to  even  our  ordinary  names  are,  we 
take  it,  not  a  sign  of  servility,  but  of  benign  courtesy.  When 
Christ  verbally  forbade  the  title  of  Rabbi,  and  Master,  and  Father, 
he  did  not  forbid  the  mere  prefix  syllables,  nor  the  courtesy 
express  in  modem  days,  but  that  subjection  oi'  the  sold  to  the  dicta 
of  those  absolute  dogmatists  who  overruled  reason  and  truth,  by 
which  Jewish  tradition  excluded  Christianity,  li  it  was  the  mere 
literal  epithet  that  Christ  forbade,  then  the  Boston  student  must 
refuse  to  address  hi-;  chief  teacher  as  Dr.  Warren,  or  Pro! 
Warren,  or  Rev.  Warren,  or  even  Mr.  [master]  Warren,  bul 
blankly  as  Warren.  But  who  can  suppose  thai  our  Lord  gave  a 
precept  requiring  this  mere  adoption  of  the  old  Uoman  in  | 
ence  to  the  modern  style  of  address?  It  is  t"  din  j  contempt  upon 
Jesus  to  charge  him  with  so  puerile  an  ethic  Km. wing  as  wo  did 
not  only  the  high-toned  scholarship  of  Dr.  Warren,  hut  his  1  iigh- 
toned  love  of  scholarly  forms,  and   predilection   for  making 


4:70  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

scholarly  impression,  we  would  not  have  predicted  the  abnegation 
of  this  custom  in  that  quarter. 

i     Both  the  eastern  seminaries  have  drawn  forth  the  charl 
outlines  oi'a  University.     We  coincide  with  those  who  view  with 
profound  regret  the  multiplication  of  nominal  universities,  to  the 
manifest  depreciation  of  all  higher  education.     This  de] 
becomes  all  the  more  disparaging  from  the  fact  that  genuine 
can  universities  are  looming  up  in  stupendous  proportions,  flinging 
us  by  the  comparison  into  a  still  more  pitiable  background.     The 
policy  of  encouraging  every  academy  to  start,  up  into  a  noi 
university,  mid  of  scattering  small  pocket  colleges  broadcast  over 
the  country,  is  disobedience  to  the  pronounced  voice  of  the  Church, 
a  disgrace  to  her  character,  a  waste  of  her  resource?,  and  treason 
to  her  best  interests.     If,  indeed,  some  enthusiastic  and  munificent 
patron,  or  number  of  patrons,  were  ready,  like  Cornell,  with  liberal 
heart  and  purse,  at  once,  and  durii  living  years,  to  endow 

and  rear  a  university  forthwith' to  vie  with  the  tallest  of  the  land, 
he  might  put  it  just  where  he  pleased,  and  we  would  consent  that 
half  a  dozen  small  affairs  should  repose  under  its  shadow.  And 
the  fact  that  educational  rationalism,  a  separation  of  higher  <.  ;. 
tion  from  religion,  with  a  verging  toward  Atheism,  promises  to 
reign  in  institutions  like  old  Harvard  and  young  Cornell  empha- 
sises the  call  for  a  Methi  disl  university  of  the  highest  grade  But 
an  institution  with  less  than  a  million  endowment,  yet  plastered 
with  the  name  University,  is  in  danger  of  soon  feeling  oppr« 
by  the  title  it  bears. 

The  criticism  upon  the  terms.  Halieutics  and  KerykHcs,  terms  im- 
ported from  Germany,  have  not  been  of  the  most  intelligent  kind, 
and  yet  are  not  without  their  basis.  The  German  technics,  intro- 
duced during  the  last  thirty  years,  are  no  improvement  to  our  lan- 
guage. They  aie  clumsy,  crowd  out  appropriate  native  terms,  and 
come  in  with  bad  associations.  It  is  not  pleasant  to  learn 
Christian  defenses  arc  all  .,;/  logetic,  and  Christian  truths  are  all 
dogmatic,  and  Christiai  i  ts  are  all  polemic;  that  the  )  hil  •  - 

ophy  of  common  '  ft Z,  and  that  the  higher  philosophy 

is  barely  rational.     And  as  t<>  that  "word  of  learned  length  and 
thundering  sound,"  soterioloyical,  with  a  body  as  long  as  an  ana- 
conda's, we  would  like  t"  take  it  by  tin-  tail  and  fling  it  back  i<- 
Germany.      Many  technics,  therefore,  even    authorized   !>_>• 
German  extraction,  arc  very  undesirable  accessions. 

Laying  out,  of  pr<  i  til  account  our  two  humble  institutes  for  the 
Southern  freedraen's  benefit,  we  have  reason  for  great  gratulation 
at  the.  aspect  presented  by  our  three  noble  Theological  5 


1869.]       -  Quarterly  BookTable.  477 

They  arc  no  supposititious  affairs.  The  ripest  scholarship  of  the 
Church,  the  best  practical  ability,  the  most  untiring  industry,  the 
worthiest  and  purest  ambition  to  aid  the  Church  in  acquiring  a 
learned,  fervent,  working  ministry,  are  concentrated  at  these  three 
foci.  Our  young  ministry  will  increasingly  realize  their  value,  and, 
aided  by  an  increasing  liberality,  will  gather  in  larger  number  to 
their  halls.  The  Church  gives  the  faculties  her  fullest  confidence  ; 
and  her  prayer  and  trust  is,  that  their  great  problem  will  he  con- 
scientiously and  successfully  wrought. 


Juven  ile. 

We  have  received  from  Hitchcock  &  Walden  the  following  Five 
Series  in  red  and  gold  : 

Ebme  Circle  Library:  Series  I.   Beginning  Life;   Living  in  Earnest;  Counsel  to 

Converts:  Yoiing  Man's  Counselor;  Successful  Merchant 
Series  II.   Young  Lady's  Counselor;   Path  of  Life;   Friends  in  Heaven;  Early 

Choice. 
Series  III.  Village  Blacksmith ;  Heavenly  "World ;  Hester  Ann  Rogers;  Sketches 

for  the  Young:  Memoirs  of  Cavvosso;  Sketches  and  Incidents. 
Series  IV.  Sketches  of  Pioneer  History;  Pea  Ridge  and  Prairie  Grove;  Diary  of 

a  Country  Pastor;  Jottings  from  Life. 
Series  V.  Wesley  and  his  Coadjutors;  Asbury  and  his  Coadjutors. 

From  Perkinpine  &  Higgins  the  following: 
My  Bible  Class.    With  an  Essay  on  Bible-Class  Teaching.    By  a  Scripture  Teacher. 

2-imo.,  pp.'lTT.     Philadelphia;  Perkinpine  &  Higgins. 
Rays  from  the  Sun:  or,  Twelve  Lectures  from  the  Bible,  for  Children  and  their 
■  Teachers.     By  S.   G.   GUEEX.     2-lmu,    pp.    160.      Philadelphia:    Perkinpine  & 

Higgins. 
Crumbs  from  the  Bread  of  Life ;  or,  Twelve  Lectures,  illustrating  for  Children  the 

Leading  Points  of  Evangelical   Doctrina     liy  S.  CI.  Green.     2-lmo.,  pp.  153. 

Philadelphia:  Perkinpine  &  Higgins. 
Bible  Portraits;  or,   Nine   short    Addresses   to   Children.     With   Sugj 

Teachers  and  Preachers  of  tho  Children's  Church.     By  S.  G.  Greex.     24mo., 

pp.  1SG.     Philadelphia:  Perkinpine  &  Uig  ins. 


Pamphlets. 

Woman  as  God  made  her;  The  True  Woman.  V^y  Rev.  J.  D.  Fulton,  ofTremont 
Temple.  To  which  is  added,  Woman  vs.  Ballot.  24mo.,pp.  48.  Bostoi  I 
Sbepard.  1869. 
Mr.  Fulton  is  generally  a  graceful  writer  and  an  eloquent  speaker, 
with  his  heart  ou  the  right  side,  and  we  trust  a  noble  future  be- 
fore him.  His  arguments,  however,  upon  female  suffrage,  such  as 
that  its  advocates  are  generally  infidel,  are  rather  ad  captandum 
than  logical.  We  had  supposed  thai  in  the  Baptist  Church  female 
suffrage  had  long  been  a  right,  safely  and  properly  exercised.  He 
overlooks  the  fact  thai  our  Methodisl  General  Conference,  by  a 
large  majority,  gave  to  females  the  ballot  on  one  of  our  mosl  funda- 
mental constitutional  questions. 


478  Methodist  Quarterly  Review,  [July 

We  would  stoggest  to  Mr.  Fulton  that  there  is  no  such  English 
word  as  helpmeet.  We  are,  moreover,  sony  to  find  him  Baying 
"  We  have  never  supposed  it  the  imperative  duty  of  every  man  to 
vole.  Andweknowthal  many  of  the  most  intelligent  and  upright 
do  not  vote."  The  man  who  claims  to  be  upright  and  refuses  to 
vote  falsifies  his  claim.  He  surrenders  our  nation  over  to  the  ride 
of  the  wicked,  and  is  a  traitor  to  his  country  and  his  God.  He  is 
responsible  for  all  the  "  nastiness,"  etc.,  which  Mr.  Fulton  ascribes 
to  our  elections,  and  which  the  presence  of  woman  might  purify. 

Mr.  Fulton  says,  but  does  not  prove,  that  "the  right  to  vote  im- 
plies the  right  to  rule,  and  to  take  the  presidential  chair."  lie  might 
as  well  say  that  the  right  to  refuse  an  offered  husband  implied  the 
right  to  select  her  man.  A  woman,  even  if  she  never  ought  to 
rule,  ought  to  have  some  voice  in  the  selection  of  her  public  as  of  her 
domestic  "  lord."  Mr.  Fulton  has  no  gift  for  making  a  watch;  but 
he  would  perhaps  claim  some  right  to  choose  his  own  watchmaker. 
St.  Paul  probably  tolerated  the  four  daughters  of  his  friend  Philip 
at  Caesarea,  who  weve  proplietesses  ;  and  also  his  friend  Pha-be,  of 
Pome,  who  was  a  deaconess  ;  and  yet  he  suffered  not  a  woman  to 
teach  amid  the  wrangling  contests  of  the  synagogue,  nor  to  usurp 
authority;  nor  have  we  in  the  Xew  Testament  any  official  eldress 
or  bisho2>ess.  And  all  these  distinctions  are  quite  as  nice  as  the 
difference  between  voting  for  a  ruler  and  being  elected  to  rule. 

We  neither  fear,  expect,  or  desire  to  see  woman  filling  high  mil- 
itary, civil,  or  ecclesiastical  office,  for  which  she  is  in  the  general 
physiologically  and  psychologically  unfitted.  Offices  under  gov- 
ernment requiring  a  dexterous  tact  in  management  she  may  dis- 
charge, not  posts  of  authority  requiring  bold  statesmanship.  But 
a  vote  is  a  quiet  exercise  of  a  humble  privilege,  partaking  as  much 
of  the  nature  of  a  petition  as  vf  a  mandate.  Puling  ability  is  a 
specialty;  its  possessor  is  selected  on  principles  of  particular  expe- 
diency j  voting  is  a  rightful  universality,  appertaining  to  all  v  ' 
destinies  are  at  stake,  and  are  competent  to  act. 

We  have  for  many  years  f<  It  it  our  most  solemn  duty,  having  for 
self  and  descendants  a  deep  interest  in  the  welfare  of  our  country, 
to  ^o  to  the  polls  and  deposit  our  vote.  We  should  do  so  for  ex- 
ample to  others,  even  if  we  gave  a  blank  vote.  We  have  not  found 
atthe polls  thai  "nastiness "of  which  Mr.  Ful ton  speaks.  We  have 
passed  through  Xew  York  city  on  the  most  important  election 
days,  and,  save  thai  the  ordinary  business  of  life  went  on,  il 
usually  been  as  quiet  as  a  Sabbath,  'flu'  voting  room  has.  indeed, 
been  of  the  plainest  order.  This  bare  plainness  i*-  doubtless  the 
result  of  the  fact  that  men  of  false  refinement  leave  the  polls  under 


1869.]  Quarterly  Bool- -Talk.  479 

tlic  care  of  the  coarser  part  of  community.  If  wc  were  all  expect- 
ing that  our  wive?  and  daughters  would  he  present  to  lake  share 
they  would,  doubtless,  be  improved  in  style.  And  then  what 
impropriety  or  immodesty  there  could  be  in  the  most  refined  lady's 
walking  forward  and  depositing  a  paper  ballot  in  a  box  sur]  • 
our  perspicacity  to  discover.  She  could  do  it  as  gracefully,  as 
femininely,  as '■lie  uowpresidi  •• :  t  our  domestic  boards,  or  stands  in 
a  quartette  at  church,  or  electrifies  the  house  from  the  stage  like  a 
Siddons  or  a  Jenny  Lind. 


Miscellaneous. 

A  Half  Century  wWi  -1  '  '•  J'  '<'  ts;  or,  The  New  York  House  of  Refu« 
its  Times.  By  B.  K.  Peirce,  D.  D.,  Chaplain  of  the  New  York  House  of  13 
Svo.,  pp.  381."  New  York:  Appleton  &  Co.     1869. 

It  was  about  fifty  years  ago  that  James  W.  Gerard,  a  young 
lawyer  of  New  York,  having  defended  a  young  culprit  really  g 
of  larceny,  was  led  to  reflect  on  the  awful  dilemma  in  which  hi< 
little  client,  with  a  large  class  of  similar  cases,  was  involved.  If 
acquitted,  as  he  really  was,  he  was  likely,  as  he  really  did,  to  be- 
come emboldened  by  impunity,  to  engage  in  a  career  of  crime; 
if  condemned,  he  was  associated  with  criminals  in  prison  of  the 
hardest  depravity  and  became  equally  hardened.  Mr.  Gerard 
was  already  associated  with  a  body  of  men  whose,  names  are 
enrolled  in  the  records  of  New  York-  philanthropy  in  a  Society  for 
the  Prevention  of  Pauperism,  and  he  brought  before  that  body  a 
report  upon  the  subject,  of  juvenile  reform  which  his  family  preserve 
as  a  permanent  memento  of  a  great  fact.  The  Society-  gradually 
entered  upon  the  enterprise  of  constructing  an  institution  in  which, 
should  be  blended  in  due  proportions  the  elements  of  prison,  fam- 
ilv  school,  work-house,  and  church,  all  which  elements  were  to 
co-operate  for  a  reconstruction  of  the  juvenile  character. 

Vjy  favor  of  Congress  they  purchased,  at  a  reduced  sum,  the  Na- 
tional Arsenal  at  the  fork  of  the  Bloomingdale  and  old  Boston  Pos( 
roads  and  so  refitting  it  as  to  accommodate  a  large  numl 
pants  placed  the  establishmi  til  under  a  wise  superintendence,  and 
made,  a  most  successful  experiment.     Entirely  apart  from  politics, 
the  men  who  wereengagedin  the  enterprise,  attracted  by  no  selfish 
ends  but  inspired  \vjtli  an  unpaid  philanthropy,  were  purely  self- 
selected  and  were  of  the  true  elect.     In  due  time  the  pop 
extending   up   town,  and    streets    threatening  to 
grounds,  our  institute,  like  Daniel  Boone,  was  compelled  lo 
relive  in  a  place  remote  from  encroaching   civilization,  and  th  • 


480  Methodist  Quarterly  Iteviclo.  [July, 

spot  they  abandoned  became  a  centre  of  social  splendor,  tbe  resi- 
dence of  " Flora  M'Flimsey  of  Madison  Square."     They  obtained 

possession  of  the  hospital  called  Bellevue,  looking  down  upon 
the  East  River,  but  the  same  overflow  of  population  compelled 
another  move.  Our  institute  at  last  took  flight  beyond  Hell  Gate, 
and  landed  on  an  elysian  isle — transformed  from  crude  nature  by 
the  hand  of  art  into  elysian — in  the  East  River,  Randall's  Island, 
where  it  stands  forever  a  prison  yet  a  palace. 

Dr.  Peirce  says : 

Few  sites  are  more  chai  ming  now  than  the  noble  buildings,  surrounded  with  their 
handsomely-arranged  grounds  and  fruitful  gardens— a  very  happy  .- 
work  upon  which  the  Socictj  for  half  a  century  has  been  engaged.    1 
have  been  recovered  from  stony  wastes,  and  from  low  and  unwholesoi 
and  are  now  both  beautiful  and  useful.     The  inmates  of  her  houses  have 
often  the  hardi  si  and  m  »sl  i  nproinising  children  of  the  land,  taken  from  the  1 
haunts,  and  themselves  noxi  s  of  tbe  community.     Many 

now  an  honor  to  her  culture,  and  to  the  Statu  that  has  generously  offered  the 
means  both  for  the  physical  and  moral  changes  which  have  been  wrought  out 
here. 

Apart  from  the  benevolent  tenor  of  his  topic,  Dr.  Pence's  pages 
are  fascinating  a*  a  romance.  The  volume  present-  a  beautiful 
advance  of  successful  history;  it  abounds  with  portraitures  of  noble 
character,  men  memorable  in  our  best  Xew  York  history,  and  it  is 
interspersed  with  anecdotes  so  blending  humor  and  pathos  as  to 
compel  at  once  the  laugh  and  the  tear.  The  institute,  by  its 
pure  benevolent  character,  and  the  most  scrupulous  wisdom  of  its 
management,  .has  won  the  heart  wherever  it  has  approached. 
Men  Mho  have  not  the  spirit  to  enter  the  enterprise  And  the  soft 
side  of  their  nature  touched  when  it  comes  in  contact  with  them. 
When  it  cctaes  into  courl  the  stern  judge  flings  all  the  presump- 
tions of  law  into  its  favor;  and  when  its  prerogatives  are  in 
question,  successive  Statu  governors  of  different  parties  screw  their 
own  powers  to  the  narrowest  dimensions  to  give  it  a  wide  berth. 
Above  all,  it  is  exempt  from  that  fearful  anomaly  that  threateus 
the  ruin  of  our  republic,  the  appointment  of  i:s  officer  .  not  for 
their  moral  fitness,  but  for  their  services  to  a  political  party. 

With  the  history  of  this  institute  Dr.  Pcircehas  happily  bl< 
notices  of  cognate  philanthropic  efforl  from  the  time  thai  Howard 
was  inspired  to  start  upon  his  divine  mi-  ion  to  the  presenl  d 
as  to  render  ii  a  true  manual  of  humanitarianism.     And  it  is  a  hu- 
manitarianism  of  a  sort,  silent,  dewy  nature.     It  stands  in  1 
ful,  modest  contrast  to  that  fierce  and  fiery  humanitarianism   be- 
queathed us  by  the  terrible  yet  necessary  antislavery  battle,  which 
now  "raves,  recites,  and  maddens  through  the  land,"  costing  nothing 
but  vociferation,  unpacking  itself  in    satires   and   iuvectives,  and 


1809.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  481 

leaving  us  in  doubt  whether  the  philanthropy  is  any  thing  more 

than  a  cloak  for  the  infidelity.  The  volume  opens  histories  and 
expands  views  into  which  it  becomes  every  Christian  minister  to 
enter.  And  we  could  wish  that  the  hook  could  he  so  abridged,  by 
omission  of  its  appendix  and  other  less  necessary  parts,  as  to  furnish 
a  very  cheap  edition  for  wide  spread  circulation.* 


27-f  Symldism  of  Free-Mi iso nry :    Illustrating   and   Explainii  ..• 
Philosophy,  its  Legends,   Myths,  and  Symbols.     By  Albert  Macket, 
Author  of  "Lexicon  of  Freemasonry,"  "Text-J 
etc.,  etc.     1 1  mo.,  pp.  3 CI.     New  York :  Clark  &  Maynard.     L869. 

The  profoundest  secret  in  masonry — one,  indeed,  unknown  to  : 
— is  the  origin  of  its  own  existence.     Its  claim  of  descent  from  the 
Ancient  Mysteries,  or  from  any  of  the  esoteric   institutes  of  an- 
tiquity, is,  of  course,  transparent  "  bunkum.*'     There,  however,  is 
no  doubt  that  Sir  Christopher  Wren  was  grand  master  of  an  i 
ciation  of  which  the  present  body  is  a  descendant.     And  W 
association  was  probably  slenderly  connected  with  the  associ: 
of  architects  which  existed  in  the  Middle  Ages,  by  whose  genins 
and  labor  the  grand  piles  of  Christian  antiquity  were  erected. 
To  these  associations  of  artisans  the  highest  dignitaries  of  Church 
and  State  were  connected  in  an  honorary  way,  so  that  in  those 
ages   it  possessed   both  a   manual  and  an  intellectual   era 
members.     Gradually  it  lost  its  actual  connection  with  the  man- 
ual trade,  and  became  purely  a  theoretical  institute,  a  mutual-aid 
society. 

No  sensible  man  supposes  ihis  association  to  possess  any 
heritage  of  profound  truth  unknown  to  the  rest  of  the  \ 
Taking  for  its  fundamental  principles  the  existence  of  God  and 
the  immortality  of  the  soul,  i!  seeks  to  impress  by  signifi 
symbols  the  lessons  of  a  perfect  morality  upon  the  mind,  and  to 
require  its  average  practice  in  its  members  ;  so  that,  without  deny- 
ing a  revelation,  it  is  a  sort  of  human  Church  of  natural  rcii. 

*  Tie  "Princeton  Iteviow"  thus  \.  ry  justly  charai  I 
long  experie         f  Dr.  Peii  intii 

House  of  E 

pursued  there  •.  and  of  the  comparative  i 

bin  qualifications  i  ' 

whieb  he  :'  much  of  the 

rej         ... 
• 

ing  ;  the  views  pn 
along  with  the  ■     airable  slruci    i 

where;  the  summation  of  Lh<  es,  and  judicial  dech 

of  points  that  have  em<  rged  in  the  d  tvelopment  of  this  grcal  eharil 
othi  r  valuable  matter,  render  tliis  work  an  important  aid  in  th    - 
the  more  difficult  questions  in  aoci  log;  and  <       stian  philantbi 


482  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July, 

The  immense  number  of  its  members  "who  arc  too  vase  not  to 
understand  what  is  right,  and  too  just  to  flagrantly  violate  it, 
seems  a  voucher  that  it  contains  nothing  atrociously  wicked. 
We  could  never  see  any  need,  certainly,  of  its  binding  iis 
members  l>y  ferocious  oaths  to  keep  its  secrets,  for  it  has  no 
immutable  secrets  to  keep.  The  secrets  revealed  to-day  could 
be  substituted  by  new-made  secrets  to-morrow.  Ceremonials, 
trappings,  symbols,  and  signs  are  pretty  much  all  of  secrets  it 
can  possess;  and  these,  with  its  showy  externals  to  impress  the 
popular  imagination,  and  its  mutual  aids  and  general  benev- 
olences'and  morals,  are  all  there  is  to  it.  "Without  advising  any 
young  man  to  join  a  "  secret  society,"  and  recognizing  the 
liability  of  every  permanent  organization  to  he  abused  to  wrong 
ends,  we  see  no  reason  to  doubt  that  as  a  whole  masonry  is  a 
beneficent  institution. 

Dr.  Mackey  seems  at  the  present  time  to  be  the  great  expositor 
of  Masonry.  He  writes  in  a  clear,  terse,  ringing  style.  For 
both  the  outsiders  and  the  insiders  this,  and  a  catalogue  of 
masonic  books  by  the  same  author  and  publishers,  are  doubtless 
standard  instructors. 


Twenty-Fourth  Annual  Report  of  the  Executive  Committee  of  the  Prison  Asi  i  a- 
turn  of  New  Tori;  and  Accompanying  Documents,  for  1868.  Argus  Company. 
Printers,  Albany,  X.  Y. 

In  our  July  number  for  last  year  the  question  of  the  reformation 
of  criminals  in  our  penal  institutions  was  considered,  and  refer- 
ence was  made  to  the  very  valuable  contribution  of  Doctors 
Wines  and  Dwiglit  to  the  material  facts  and  principles  involved 
in  the  solution  of  this  problem  in  their  volume  entitled  "Prisons 
and  Reformatories  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,"  prepared 
at  the  instance  of  the  Prison  Association.  This  Association,  of 
which  Dr.  E.  C.  "Wines  is  the  Corresponding  Secretary,  has  now 
issued  a  volume  of  even  greater  value  in  the  form  of  its  twenty- 
fourth  annual  report.  From  the  cultivated  pen  of  its  able  Secre- 
tary, from  the  highest  authorities  upon  the  subjects  discussed  m 
England,  France,  Denmark,  and  Russia,  and  from  the  most 
intelligent  wardens  of  prisons  mid  practical  writers  in  our  own 
country,  papers  have  heen  collected  in  this  volume  bearing  upon 
all  the  related  questions  of  prison  discipline,  the  recovery  of 
criminals  from  a  life  of  crime,  and  the  reformation  of  juvenile 
delinquents.  It  forms  an  octavo  volume  of  nearly  seven  hundred 
pages,  and  is  a  thesaurus  of  information  upon  these  topics  unsur- 
passed by  any  American  or  European  treatise.     There  is  a  gen- 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  4S3 

eral  conviction  among  students  in  social  science  that  the  period 
has  been  reached  for  some  radical  changes  in  the  administration 
of  criminal  law,  and  for  more  positive  measures  to  secure  the 
recovery  as  well  as  the  punishment  of  those  who  havehecome  the 
foes  of  society  by  entering  upon  a  life  of  crime.  In  almost  every 
civilized  nation  this  question  is  urging  itself  upon  the  considera- 
tion of  thoughtful  men.  Perhaps  no  paper  in  this  volume  will 
give  a  more  grateful  surprise  to  the  reader  than  the  elaborate 
and  original  discussion  of  the  problem  of  prison  discipline  by 
Count  W.  Sollohub,  of  Russia.  He  will  marvel  to  find  such 
advanced  and  generous  opinions  promulgated,  and  even  em- 
bodied, in  an  institution  in  this  Empire.  In  no  country  can  these 
well-considered  theories  of  reform  in  the  treatment  of  crime  be- 
more  readily  tested  than  in  ours;  the  criminal  class  has  not  yet 
become  with  us  formidable  in  numbers,  or  a  hopelessly  sunken 
and  emasculated  body  of  pariahs,  as  in  the  metropolitan  citi 
Europe,  and  our  mobile  form  of  government  easily  adapts  itself 
to  radical  changes.  We  are  now  hardly  abreast  of  the  advanced 
experiments  in  this  direction  on  the  Eastern  Continent,  while 
our  true  place  is  at  the  head  of  the  column  of  social  reformations. 
This  volume,  we  trust,  will  be  an  efficient  aid  in  securing  for  us 
this  position,  and  we  commend  its  admirable  and  interesting 
pages  to  the  thoughtful  perusal  of  all  in  any  way  connected  with 
the  administration  of  public  affairs  or  the  management  of  prisons 
and  reformatories. 

The  Wedding  Day  in  all  Ages  and  Count)  ies.    By  Edwabd  J.  "Wood.    12mo.,  pp.  200. 
New  York:  Harper  k  Brothers.     1869. 

"Bolingbroke  says  thai  marriage  was  instituted  because  it  was 
necessary  that  parents  should  know  certainly  their  own  respective 
offspring;  and  that  as  a  woman  cannot  doubt  whether  she  i-  the 
mother  of  the  child  she  bears,  so  a  man  should  have  all  t! 
su ranee  the  law  can  give  him  thai  he  is  the  father  of  the  child  i 
puted  to  have  been  begotten  b_\  him."  This  bring  the  natural 
basis  of  marriage,  the  numerical  equality  of  the  tw  cure  1 

by  some  unknown  but  established  law  of  nature,  den  onstrates 
that  polygamy  is  a  crime  againsl  nature.  And  the  deep  connection 
of  marriage  with  the  individual  existence,  temporal  and  eternal,  of 
every  member  of  the  race,  profoundly  suggests  a  religious  sacred- 
ness  iu  the  formation  of  the  union. 

Mr.  Wood's  book  is  one  of  the  most  entertaining  and  not  least 
valuable  of  that  class  of  bbokg  which  trace  a  single  subject  through 
the  changes  of  human  history  and  the  varieties  of  the  race. 


2  as- 
e- 


4S4:  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [July. 

Five  Acres  Too  Much.     A  Truthful   E  icid  iti  d  of  the  Attractions  of  the  Country, 

and  a  Car  ful  I    i  sideration  of  tl  s  of  Pr<  Loss 'as  involved  iu 

Amateur  Fartni with  much  Val  able  Advice  to  those  about  Purcli    ing] 

or  Small  Places  in  the   Rural   Districts.     By  Robert  33.  Roo  evi  .T. 

pp.296.     New  York:  Harper  &  Brothers.     1869. 

A  clever  satire  on  cockney  farming. 
The  Gospel  Tn  u  iry  <•  d  Expository  and  U  rrnony  of  (he  7-1  ■  i  in  (he 

Words  of  th    Autltorized    Version.     Having  Sci  ' 

Notes  from  the  dqosI  Approved  Commentators,  etc,  etc.     Compiled  by  R 

Mdtfriss.     Two  volumes  in  one.     12mo.,  pp.  019.    New  Tork:  M.  W.  Dodd. 

Much  valuable  matter  in  small  space. 
The  Life  a,  '  F  stl  -  of  St.  Pa  I.    By  Rev.  W.  J.  Conybeare,  M.A.,  Late  ] 

of  Trinity  C  "      .  C        ridge,  and  Rev.  J.  S.  Howsox,  M.A.,  Principal  i 

Collegiate  Institution,  Liverpool.      The  only  compl  unabridged  • 

Two  vols  in  one.     8  vo.,  pp.  556.     New  Tork:  Charles  Co.    1S69. 

Kathleen.    By  tl  of  "  Raymond's  Heroine."     8vo.,  pp.  183.     New  Tork: 

Harper  .t  Brothers.     1869. 
That  Boy  of  X   cotfs.      By   Charles  Lever,   Author  of  "The  Bramleighs  of 

Bishop's  Polly,"  etc.     With  illustrations.     Svo.,  pp.  73.    New  York:  Hai 

Brothers.     1369. 
He  Knew  He  Was  Right.     By  Axthony  Trollope.    With  illustrations  by  Marcus 

Stone.     Svo..  pp.  172.    New  Tork:  Harper  &  Brothers. 
The  Virginians.    A  Tale  of  the  Last  Century.     By  Wm.  Makepeace  Thackeray, 

Author  of  ■■  Vai  '\  Fair,"  etc     With  illustrations  by  the  Author.     Svo.,  pp.  :i  I. 

Nov  York:  Harper &,  Brothers.     1869. 
Breaking  a  B>u  ■;"'.-'■'  (;';"'  l^nche   Ellerlie's   Ending.     By  the    Author  of  "Guy 

Livingstone,"  "Sword  and  Gown,"  etc.      Illustrated.      Svo..  pp.    139. 

York:  Harper  i  Broth  rs.     1S69. 
Tue  Dpdge  Club;  or,  Italy  i:i  1859.     By  James  De  MlLLE,  Author  of  "Cm  I 

Creese."     With  one  hundred  illustrations.     Svo.,  pp.  133.     New  Tork:  Harper 

k  Brothers. 
Vanity  Fair.     V  Novel  without  a  Hero.    By  William  Makepeace  Thackeray, 

Author  of  "The   Newcomes,"   "Pendennis,"  etc.      With  illustrations  b 

Author.     8vo..  pp.  332.     New  Tork :  Harper  &  Brothers.     1869. 
TheSi        '  A  Story  of  Lippe  Detmold.    By  the  author  of  "  M 

Progress."     With  by  0.  G.  Buch.     12mo.,  paper  cover,  pp.  153. 

Nov.-  York:  Harper  A  Brothers.  "  1869. 
The  Victori    -.     A    Poem  ou   the    Assassination  of  President  Lincoln.     By  M.  B. 

Bird,  Wesl  ry.  Port-au-Prince,  Hayti.     12mo.,  pp.  57.     Ki- . 

Jamaica:  M."  De  Cordova,  M'Dougall  4  Co.     1866. 
Malbone.     An  Port  R  By  Thomas  Wentworth  Hjggixson.     12ino., 

pp.  244.     Fi  '  &  Co.      1869. 

Three  Seasons  i      '  V        trd*.     Tn  iting  of  Vine  Culture;  Vine  D 

and  its  Cure;  Wine  Mai  ,  Red  and  White ;  Wine  Drinking 

feci:;,'   I  rals.     By  William  J.  FlaGG.      12n  Now 

York":   Harper  1869. 

Fisl  ng  in  An  •     I  By  I  itt.     With  One  Hundred  ai 

enty  illustr  i    :-.     12mo.,  pp.  :  •'..     New  Tork:  Harpor  &  Brothers.     I 

!■:•  i ■■-:.  s  of  tlie  Plymouth  Brethren  -1  n  m  to  !■■   Contrary  to 

Scripture:  I      Rev.  Edward  Hartley  Dewabt.     24jno.,  ] 

Toronto:   V.  i  ■'  " 
O,.  the  D  '•-.  P  '  Organic  Life.     By  '/..  C.  M " 

M.D.,  Pres  '  <■"■     Svo.,  pp.  38.     St.  I  >uis:   P.  SI   P  i 

1869. 
77/6  Case  of  C  ba.     With  a  Lottci  from  John  D.  Shen 
.  pp.  28.     New  York:   Sol  I 

1869. 
Livingstone  in  Africa.    Fits  Explorations  and  Missionary  1    I  »rs.    Bj  !."■•.   a  A.«. 

Jewett.     '■  ■  pp.301.    Cincinnati:  Hitchcock* 

den.     New  York:  Carlton  &  Lai 


JA 


ETHODIST 

Quarterly  Eeview 

OOTOBEE,    1869. 


Abt.  L— MEMORABILIA  OF  JOHN  GOODWIN. 

The  name  of  "John  Goodwin,  the  Araiinian,"  the  world 
should  " not  willingly  let  die."  Barlow  could  write  to  him: 
"  I  always  find  in  the  prosecution  of  jour  arguments  that  per- 
spicuity and  acuteness  which  I  often  seek  and  seldom  find  in 
the  writings  of  others."  John  Owen  was  compelled  to  say  of 
him :  "  My  adversary  is  a  person  whom  his  worth,  pains,  dili- 
gence, and  opinions,  and  the  contests  wherein  on  their  account 
he  hath  publicly  engaged,  have  delivered  him  from  being  the 
object  of  any  ordinary  thoughts  or  expressions.  Nothing  not 
great,  not  considerable,  not  some  way  eminent,  is  by  any 
spoken  of  him,  either  consenting  with  him  or  dissenting  from 
him."  Puritan  and  Churchman  alike  acknowledged  his  learn- 
ing, talents,  and  power.  Though  devoted  to  profound  theo- 
logical studies,  he  so  influential];,  participated  in  the  political 
discussions  of  his  times,  that  at  the  Restoration  parliamentary 
vengeance  coupled  his  books  with  John  Milton's  in  the  sen- 
tence of  burning  by  the  common  hangman  ;  and,  while  his  life 
was  spared,  he  was  held  to  be  of  sufficient  consequence  to  be 
forever  incapacitated  from  all  public  employment.  Oblivion 
or  obscurity  is  not  the  rightful  portion  of  such  a  man.  Baxter, 
Howe,  and  Owen  could  fall  in  ■  and   suffer  ejection 

from  their  pulpits  only  to  shine  with   greater  splendor  in 
ceeding  ages.     The   University   of   Oxford   burned   Milton's 
political  works ;  but  the  philosopher  and  statesman  of  to-day 
Foubth  Seeies.  Vol.  XXL— 31 


4S6  Memorabilia  of  Join  Goodwin.  [October, 

find  in  his  pages  some  of  their  profoundest  lessons  of  wisdom. 
So  time,  that  often  reverses  the  decrees  of  the  past  and  finds 
the  world's  truest  heroes  among  the  men  most  deeply  covi 
by  the  prejudices  of  their  own  age,  has  lifted  the  vail  that  for 
a  century  and  a  half  rested  upon  the  fame  of  this  noblest  of 
the  old  Puritans. 

John  Goodwin  had  the  honor  of  co-operation  with  the  :• 
■men  of  his  time  who  struggled  and  suffered  for  the  liberty  of 
England,  and  in  the  cause  of  religious  liberty  he  was  an  emi- 
nent leader.     He  had  the  misfortune,  however,  of  holding  senti- 
ments so  obnoxious  to  one  party  or  another,  that  when  he  fell 
at  the  Restoration,  he  stood  so  alone  that  no  party  was  con- 
cerned  for  the  rescue  of  his   name   and  works   from    eternal 
reproach.     As  an  advocate  of  the  fullest,  religious  toleration, 
he  had   opposed   the  pretentious  claims  of   Episcopacy  and 
Presbytery  alike,  and  could   not  expect   favor  from  parti 
of  the  restored  Establishment.     lie  had  defended  the  sentence 
pronounced  by  his  judges    against  Charles  as  just,  right,  and 
necessary  for  the  liberty  and  safety  of  the  State ;  and  no  i-oyu\- 
ist,  however  ready  he  might  be,  because  of  his  opposition  t 
extravagances  of  the  Parliament,  to  exempt  him  from  the  pen- 
alty of  death,  would  subject  his  own  loyalty  to  suspicion  by  any 
eulogium  upon  him.     lie  was  the  most  outspoken  Arminian 
of  his  day  ;  and  Calvinists,  who  would  rally  around  Owen   and 
Howe,  perpetuating  their  influence  and  renown,  in  those  days 
of  uneharitableness  and  hardness  were  more  likely  to  rejoice 
in  the  downfall  of  their  stoutest  antagonist  than  to  give  him 
honor.     The  Episcopal    clergj   were  mostly  Arminians;    but 
they  were  loyalists  as  well,  and  the  stigma  of  disloyalty,  which 
rested  upon  Goodwin  as  truly  as  upon  Cromwell  or  Harap 
was  too  heavy  a  burden  for  them   to  lift  for  the  sake  of  the 
theological  creed  held  in  common  with  them   by  one  who  was 
hostile  to  the  intolerant  Church.     Had  he  been  either  a  I 
ist  or  a  Calvinist,  he  would  have  stood  in  the  world's  judgment 
pre-eminent  among  the  men  of  his  generation:  beinga  Puri- 
tan and  an  Arminian  it  was  inevitable  that  the  pub': 
which  fell  upon  him  should  have  crushed  him,  leaving  but  a 
precious  few,  unknown    and  uninfluential,  whose  self-inl 
did  not  require .forgetfulness  of  him  and  his  works  except  for 
purposes  of  defamation  and  misrepresentation.     But  tin-  truth 


1SG9.]  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  4S7 

is,  lie  was  more  nearly  right  than  they  all ;  and  the  free  thought 
of  the  nineteenth  century,  which  has  less  respect  for  the  jus 
d'vclnum  of  kings  than  for  the  rights  of  the  people,  and  calls 
no  man  master  except  as  lie  nobly  holds  and  fearlessly  teaches 
the  truth,  is  proving  the  Nemesis  which  awards  to  John  Good- 
win his  rightful  place  among  the  loftiest  names  of  the  period 
of  the  Commonwealth. 

The  solution  of  the  sole  mystery  in  his  history  and  fortunes 
is  in  the  tact  that  he  was  no  time-server  or  parasite,  but  unva- 
rying in  hi;  fidelity  to  God.  truth,  and  man.  jt  was  impos- 
sible for  a  London  minister  to  be  neutral  in  the  struggle  which 
gave  supremacy  to  the  Parliament,  abolished  Episcopacy,  es- 
tablished Prc-sbyterianism,  and  cost  the  King  his  head.  Had 
he  rolled  along  with  the  popular  wave,  he  might  have  ridden 
upon  its  summit  into  a  place  of  honor  and  power.  He  would 
have  denounced  all  who  dissented  from  the  prevalent  Oalvin- 
istic  sentiments  as  heretics,  Pelagians,  and  blasphemers-,  and 
called  upon  the  civil  magistrate  to  punish  them  with  his  strong- 
arm.  He  might  thus  have  won  the  distinction  of  being  fre- 
quently called  to  preach  before  the  Parliament,  where  he  could 
have  skillfully  dodged  all  allusion  to  inconvenient  topics,  though 
all  England  was  shaking  with  them;  he  might  have  become 
the  right  band  of  Cromwell  as  one  of  his  "  triers"  in  settling 
the  pulpits  of  the  realm,  and  have  sat  in  the  vice-chancellor's 
chair  in  the  university.  Or,  if  ambition's  voice  could  not  thus 
lead  him,  worldly  wisdom  and  a  regard  for  his  own  quiet 
would  have  bade  him  meekly  bow  before  the  storm  which  he 
could  not  control.  But  the  rights  of  conscience  were  in  peril, 
and,  the  first  of  his  order  who  had  the  penetration  to  discover 
and  the  courage  to  utter  the  great  truth,  he  openly  and  con- 
stantly proclaimed  the  inalienable  light  of  every  man  to  free- 
dom of  opinion  and  worship,  undisturbed  and  tmcontrolli 
any  earthly  power.  Jt  was  a  doctrine  as  mi; 
Presbyterian  party,  thou  in  the  ascendant  and  clamoring  for  the 
divine  right  of  their  system  and  tin;  forcible  suppression  <>f  all 
dissentients,  as  it  had  formerly  been  to  Laud.  [lis  advocacy 
of  it  wascnough  to  provoke  their  uitt<  rest  wrath;  but  t<<  this 
was  added  the  fact  thai  he  was  already  accused  of  Arminian- 
isra,  a  crime  for  which  sympathy  or  tol 
days  of  wrongs  performed  in  the  name  vi'  religion,  and  b 


4S8     ■  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [Oc 

authority  of  a  Parliament  that  was  contending  for  liberty, 
present  nothing  more  shameful  than  the  repeated  examinations 
and  final  ejection  from  his  vicarage  of  this  minister  of  more 
than  fifty  year:,  of  age,  fitted  by  his  piety,  his  learning,  his  elo- 
quence, to  adorn  the  loftiest  pnlpit  of  the  realm,  administering 
a  cup  prepared  only  for  malignants  to  one  of  the  best  fri 
and  wannest  advocates  of  the  P 
the  reason  why  lie  must  drink  it. 

An  Arminian  Goodwin  was  not  at  this  period.  Indeed,  he 
had  just  concluded  a  series  of  sermons  in  which  he  had,  as  he 
conceived,  set  forth  the  peculiar  doctrines  of  Calvinism  in  an 
unanswerable:  light,  and,  as  his  friends  asserted,  "cut  the  hair 
between  other  divines  and  Arminians."  An  exception  taken 
to  an  incidental  passage  in  one  of  them  by  a  youth  of  more  fire 
than  brains,  led  him  to  a  reinvestigation  of  the  entire  system, 
the  result  of  which  was,  its  absolute  rejection  and  the  adoption 
of  that  of  Arniinius.  From  that  day  to  the  close  of  his  public 
ministry  he  was  the  chief  mark  for  the  most  fiery  darts  of  his 
theological  foes,  from  the  author  of  the  ponderous  volume  to 
the  petty  pamphleteer.  Where  argument  could  not  demolish, 
ribaldry,  invectives,  scoffs,  falsehoods,  and  appeals  to  the  au- 
thorities to  crush  him  by  civil  power,  were  employed  against 
him  and  his  cause.  It  seems  to  have  been  only  Cromwell's 
interpositioD  that  at  one  time  saved  his  life,  lie  was,  says  his 
biographer,  "an  object  of  general  reproach:  a  sort  of  scape- 
goat, on  whoso  head  were  laid,  by  his  Calvinistic  brethren, 
nearly  all  the  errors,  heresies,  and  mental  follies  of  human 
nature."* 

Only  the  sturdiest    nature  could    have    stood  erect  in    the 
furious  storm  of  calumny  and  persecution,  and  only  oneiml 
by  divine  grace  could  have  stood  meekly.     Of  passion  he  bad 
little,  of  modesty  much;  but  for  the  truth   he  could  be  bold 
and  suii'er.     lie  says  : 

They  who  have  known  me  from  my  youth  up,  until  soui* 
years  past,  very  well  know,  that  however  I  was  encompassed 
about  with  infirmities  otherwise,  yel  did  I  never  eithen 
bear  the  blame  of  bold  icss,  bul  C'.. :  ys  the  < 
God  was  pleased  to  calJ  me  out  of  the  rotiremenl  of  nrj 
able  bashfulncss,  ho  hath  made  me,  as  Jeremy  of  old,  an  iron  pillar 
and  brazen  wall,  f 

*  Jackson's  Lifo  uf  Goodwin.  f  Triumviri,  Preface. 


1SG9J  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  4S9 

And  he  said  truly:  he  stood  like  an  iron  pillar  and  brazen 
wall  against  Lis  antagonists,  not  defiantly,  but  for  the  truth. 
He  wrote :  * 

The  serpentine  hissing  of  tongues  ai  d  p  ma  againsl  me  is  now 
no  strange  thing,  and  so  no  great  trial.  From  my  youth  np  I 
have  conflicted  with  the  viperous  contradictions  of  men;  truth 

having  acted  me  in  full  opposition  to  my  genius  and  spirit,  by 
making  me  a  man  of  contention  to  the  whole  earth.  But  I  can 
willingly  and  freely  say,  Let  truth  handle mc  as  she  plcaseth  ;  de- 
prive me  of  all  things;  yea,  of  thai  very  being  itself  of  which  I 
am  yet  possessed,  upon  condition  that  she  herself  may  reign.  .  .  . 
The  most  intemperate  zeal  of  men  against  my  ]  me,  or 

books,  is  a  temptation  of  a  very  faint  influence  upon  me  to  turn 
me  out  of  any  way  of  truth,  or  to  make  me  their  enemy.  Only 
when  the  truth  is  offended  I  confess  I  burn  ;  and  in  case  1  find  any 
strength  in  my  hand  to  redress  the  injur)  done  to  it,  1  have  no 
rest  in  my  spirit  until  1  have  attempted  the  vindication.  By 
truth,  I  do  not  moan  mine  own  opinion  ;  for  that  which  is  no  more 
than  so,  I  shall  neither  trouble  myself  nor  any  other  man  about 
it:  but  I  mean  a  doctrine  or  notion  which  1  am  able  to  demon- 
strate, either  from  the  Scriptures  or  clear  principles  in  reason,  to 
be  agreeable  to  the  mind  of  God.f 

At  another  time  he  said  : 

I  am  resolved,  God  assisting,  not  tobe  ashamed  of  any  of  Chi 
words,  nor  to  forbear,  upon  occasion,  the  freest  utterance  of  them, 
before  what  generation  soever;  and    hope  thai   neither  frici 
nor  estate,  nor  liberty,  nor  life  itself,  which  have  not  betrayed 
me  hitherto,  will  ever  prove  a  snare  of  death  to  me,  or  hinder  me 
from  finishing  my  course  with  joy.     If  I  fall  in  any  of  my  stand- 
ings up  for  the  truth,   the  loss  is   already  cast  up  by  L\v' 
arithmetic  :  I  had  rather  fall  with  Christ  than  stand  with  Cresar.  J 

The  most  important  theological  work  of  Mr.  Goodwin  is  the 
"Redemption  Redeemed," §  the  first  systematic  present! 
in  the  English  language  of  the  Arminian  doctrines,  and  more 
powerful  than  any  previous  dissent  faun  the  then  popular  the- 
ology.    Other  pens  had  attacked  one  or  more  of  the  peculiar 

*  Exposition,  Pr  face.  \  Cat 

J  Scourge  of  the  Saints  Displayed. 

§  The  modernize!  t  London  edition  of  18-J 

tion  Ri  deemed :    \VI  ■•■  :;>  the  Mo  t  Glori 

World  by  Jesus  Christ  \i   \  ■  imc& 

With  a  thorough  Discussion  of  tin   -  eat  I  is  c 

lion,  and  the  Perseverance  of  the  Sainta    n.  Jous  Goodwin,  31.  \  " 


490  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [October, 

features  of  Calvinism,  and  during  the  Commonwealth  several 
prominent  theologians  adopted  more  or  less  of  Arminian 
view? ;  but  so  marked  was  the  ability  and  so  formidable  tie 
character  of  this  work,  that  others  were  lost  sight  of,  so  far  at 
least  as  to  seemingly  justify  the  erroneous  statement  that 
'"'John  Goodwin  must  be  mentioned  as  a  solitary  but  brilliant 
exception  to  the  general  character  of  those  times."  ••  Brilliant, 
indeed,  but  not  solitary.  The  work  was  dedicated  to  "  Dr. 
Benjamin  Whiclicote,  Provost  of  King's  College,  and  Vice- 
Chancellor  of  the  University  of  Cambridge,  together  with  the 
rest  of  the  Heads  of  Colleges  and  Students  in  Divinity  in  that 
University."  It  would  be  easy  to  interpret  this  aet  us  the  pre- 
sumption of  arrogance,  or  the  defiance  of  the  trampled  but  un- 
conquered  and  haughty  controversialist,  were  it  not  for  the 
candor  and  nobleness  of  the  dedicatory  address  itself.  He 
says : 

The  oracles  consulted  by  me  about  this  dedication  were  neither 
any  undervaluing  of  you  nor  overvaluing  of  myself  or  of  the  piece 
Lore  presented  to  you,  nor  any  desire  of  drawing  respects  from  you 
cither  lo  my  person  or  any  tiling  that  is  mine,  much  less  any  ma- 
lignity of  desire  to  cause  you  to  drink  of  my  cup,  or  to  bring 
you  under  the  same  cloud  of  disparagement  which  the  worhi  I 
spread  about  me.  Praise  unto  His  grace,  who  hath  taught  me  some 
weak  rudiments  of  his  heavenly  art  of  drawing  light  out  ot^  dark- 
ness for  mine  own  use,  I  have  not  been  for  so  many  years  to- 
gether trampled  upon  to  so  little  purpose  as  to  remain  either  ig- 
norant or  insensible  of  mine  own  vileness,  and  what  element  I  am 
nearest  allied  unto,  or  so  tender  and  querulous  as  either* lo 
plain  of  those  who  si  ill  ':go  over  me  as  the  stones  in.  the  Street,"  or 
to  project  the  suli'erings  of  others  in  order  to  my  own  solace  and 
relief.  My  long  want  of  respects  from  men  is  now  tinned  to  an 
athletic  habit,  somewhat  after  the  manner  of  those  who,  by  long 
fasting,  lose  their  appetites,  and  find  a  contenteduess  of.nature  to 
live  with  little  or  no  meat  afterward.  1  can,  from  the  dui 
whereon  I  sit,  with  much  contentment  and  sufficient  enjoy] 
of  myself,  behold  my  brethren  on  thrones  round  about  me.  .  .  . 
The  discourse,  such  as  it  is,  with  all  respects  of  honor  and  love,  I 
present  unto  xvu,  not  requiring  any  thing  from  you  by  way  of 
countenance  or  approbation  otherwise  than  •  (.[citable 

te/ms  on  which  Augustus  recommended  hie  children  to  the  favor 
of  the  Senate-  -si  meruerit.  Only  as  a  friend  and  lover  of  the 
truth,  name,  and  glory  of  God  and  Jes  ;.-t  oi  the  peace, 

joy,  and  salvation  of  the  world,  with  you,  1  si  I 

out  my  soul  in  this  request  unto  you,  that  either  you  will  oounrm, 

•Bogue  and  Benn 


1S69J  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  491 

by  setting  to  the  royal  signet  of  your  approbation  and  authority, 
the  doctrine  here  maintained,  if  you  judge  it  to  be  a  (ruth,  or  else 
vouchsafe  to  deliver  me  and  many  others  from  the  snare  thereof 
by  taking  away  with  a  hand  of  light  and  potency  of  demonstration 
those  weapons,  whether  texts  of  Scripture  or  grounds  in  reason, 
wherein  we  trust.  Your  contestation  upon  these  terms  will  be 
with  me  more  precious  than  your  attestation  in  case  of  your  com- 
port in  judgment  with  me;  though  1  shall  ingenuously  confess  that 
for  the  truth's  sake  even  in  this  also  I  shall  greatly  rejoice. 

lie  requests  that  in  any  reply  they  may  make  they  will  not 
throw  their  strength  against  the  weaker  passages  or  particular 
expressions,  bat  against  the  main  points  of  his  argument,  and 
declares  his  freedom  from  any  apprehension  that  they  will  be 
influenced  by  "  those  mormolukes  or  vizors  of  Arminianism,  So- 
cinianisin,  Popery,  Pelagiauism,  with  the  like,  which  servo  to 
affright  children  in  understanding  out  of  the  love  of  many 
most  worthy  and  important  truths/'  Such  was  the  spirit  of 
this  address,  in  which,  with  eloquence  and  dignified  courtesy. 
the  hunted  divine  laid  his  offering  at  the  feet  of  his  alma 
mater. 

The  volume,  originally  (in  1651)  a  i'olio,  is  in  its  modern  form 
a  stout  octavo,  in  solid  type,  of  seven  hundred  and  forty  pages. 
The  preface,  after  the  fashion  of  those  days,  is  lengthy,  contain- 
ing forty-two  pages.  It  is  an  address  to  the  reader,  first  briefly 
stating  how  the  author  came  to  adopt  the  sentiments  here  ad- 
vocated, and  next  showing  villi  great  fullness  and  power  of 
argument,  1.  The  danger  ui'  error  and  misapprehension  in  the 
things  of  God  ;  2.  The  necessity  lying  upon  all,  without  ex- 
ception, who  are  endued  with  reason  and  understandinj  . 
engage  those  noble  faculties  to  the  utmost  about  the  thin. 
God  and  matters  of  salvation;  and,  ?>.  "The  innocency  and 
inoffensiveness  of  the  doctrines  maintained  in  the  present 
discourse  in  respect  of  those  vulgar  imputations  which,  by  way 
of  prejudice,  are  laid  to  their  charge.''  The  almosl  playfulness 
with  which  he  tells  the  story  of  his  abandoning  the  "bread" 
which  he  had  "found  ever  and  anon  gravelish  in  his  m 
and  fretting  in  his  bowels,"  is  followed   by«tl  •  and 

solid  discussions  in  which  a  'gigantic  mind  deals  with  th< 
mightiest  truths  as  ea  il v  ami  familiarly  as  men  of  common 
him!,]  do  with  those  o\'  every-day  life.  One  can  hardly  help 
inking  if  he  be  not  putting  forth  his  greatest  strength  in 


492  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.         LOctober, 

preliminaries  to  his  main  task  ;  a  query  that  is  forgotten  long 
before  the  opening  chapter  is  finished.  It  is  his  purpose,  not 
only  to  prove  the  doctrine  of  universal  redemption,  but  to  so 
prove  it  that  no  other  can  have  any  possible  foundation  left. 
lie,  therefore,  begins  at  the  very  bottom,  in  the  metaphysics  of 
theology,  and  shows  in  the  first  chapter  that  there  is  no  created 
being,  or  second  cause  whatsoever,  but  depends  upon  the  First 
and  Supreme  Cause  or  Being,  which  is  God  ;  and  that  in  its 
motions  and  operations  as  truly  as  in  its  simple  existence.  In 
the  second  chapter  he  shows,  that  although  there  is  as  absolute 
find  essential  a  dependence  of'  second  causes  upon  the  First  in 
point  of  operation  a:-  of  simple  existence,  yet  the  operations  of 
second  causes  are  not  (at  least  ordinarily)  so  immediately  or 
precisely  determined  by  that  dependence  as  their  respective 
beings  are.  In  other  words,  the  inquiry  is,  "  How  tar  and  after 
what  manner  the  motions  and  actions  of  second  causes  are  de- 
termined or  necessitated  to  be,  both  when  and  where  and  what 
they  are.  by  that  essential  dependence  which  they  have  upon 
God."  The  question  lies  at  the  point  of  divergence  of  the 
Calvinian  and  Arminian  systems,  and  is  met  with  a  fullness  of 
view  and  an  accuracy  and  delicacy  of  discrimination  not  easily 
surpassed.  Second  causes  are  of  three  kinds — natural,  animal, 
and  rational  or  voluntary.  They  all  have  such  a  dependence 
upon  God  that  "none  of  them  can  move  into  action  without  a 
suitable  concurrence  from  him,  yet  are  not  their  action-  or 
motions  thereby  determined  ordinarily,  or  necessitated  to 
them."  Of  the  first  class,  fire,  for  instance,  barns,  not  because 
of  God's  presence  or  concurrence  when  it  bums,  but  because 
of  natural  properties  given  it  by  the  law  of  creation  ;  of  the 
second,  a  lamb  runs  to  its  dam  because  of  its  natural  sympa- 
thy; of  the  third,  a  man's  "actions  arc  not  determined,  that 
is,  made  rational  and  voluntary  (much  less  are  they  nec<  si 
tated)  by  the  conjunction  or  presence  of  God  with  him  when 
he  acts  or  moves,  but  1»\  his  own  proper  and  live  electit 
what  he  nets  or  moves  unto."  Then  naturally  arise  the  .. 
tions  of  uecessitation  growing  out  of  providential  interposals 
of  God,  the  effect  of  permissive  decrees,  the  relation  of  fore 
knowledge  and.  necessity.  The  third  chapter  treats  of  the 
knowledge  and  foreknowledge  of  God,  and  the  difference  be- 
tween these  and  his  desires,  purposes,  intentions,  and  i 


1SG9.3  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  493 

and  the  distinctions  of  these  one  from  another.  The  fourth 
presents  the  perfection  of  God  in  his  nature  and  being,  to- 
gether with  his  simplicity  and  actuality,  and  his  go 
decrees  us  dedueible  from  tin's  perfection.  It  shows  that  what 
we  call  his  attributes,  separately  or  collectively,  are  only  his 
single,  simple,  and  pure  essence,  and  that  that  essence  being 
infinitely  perfect,  he  can  as  he  pleases  give  forth  himself  in  all 
the  variety  of  action  indicated  among  men  by  the  terms 
dom,  knowledge,  love,  and  the  like;  that  love,  hatred,  etc.,  are 
matters  not  of  affection,  but  of  dispensation  ;  that  God  acts  in 
eternity,  and  not  in  time  ;  that  no  act  of  his  necessitates  free 
causes;  that  "his  counsels  and  decrees  of  election,  reprobation, 
predestination,  etc.,  concerning  men,  relate  to  them,  not  as  in- 
dividually or  personally  considered,  or  as  such  and  such  men 
by  name,  hut  in  a  specifical  consideration,  or  as  persons  so  and 
so  qualified,  or  of  such  or  such  a  condition  ;"  and,  finally,  that. 
"if  God  in  his  nature  and  essence  he  absolutely  and  infinitely 
perfect,  then  can  he  act,  order,  decree  nothing  to  the  prejudice 
or  hurt  of  any  creature  whatsoever,  hut  only  in  a  way  of  right- 
eousness and  equity,  that  is,  upon  the  consideration  of  some 
demerit  or  sin  preceding." 

Thus,  beginning  with  the  First  Cause,  the  argument  proc 
step  by  step,  carefully  considering  objections  at  every  point, 
until  it  reaches  the  conclusion  that  a  rejection  of  any  man 
from  eternity  is  inconsistent  with  the  nature  of  God  and  the 
relation  of  a  Creator  to  his  creature. 

The  author  is  now  prepared  for  the  Scripture  argument,  in 
which  he  finds  four  "  great  vein-  and  correspondences,"  namely  : 
1.  Those  texts  which  present  the  gift  and  sacrifice  of  Oh] ' 
for  the  world  j  2.  Those  which  declare  the  ransom  of  ( 
and  the  will  and  desire  of  God  as  to  salvation,  to  be  f 
men  and   every  'man;    3.  Those  that  speak  of  salvation 
offered  to  him  and  whosoever  will  believe  ;  4.  Those  which 
that  Christ  died  for  men  who  may,  and  actually  do,  | 
Not  only  is  the  exposition  of  the  passages  adduced 
hut  no  erroneous  interpretation,  no  gloss,  objection,  or  cavil 
known  to  him  from  his  extensive  rea  lilered  to  i 

without  a  confutation.     At  this  point  he  takes  up  the  doctrine 
of  perseverance,  making  probably  the  most  full  and  thoi 
argument  upon  the  Bubject  ever  written,  and  bo  perfect,  thai  i: 


494  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  COctober, 

called  out  in  reply  the  pen  of  Dr.  John  Ov.cn,  the  great  Cal- 
vinian  chain}. ion  of  that  day,  in  an  octavo  of  three  times  as 
many  pages. 

The  subject  of  universal  redemption  is  then  resumed,  and 
continued  to  the  close  of  the  volume.  Additional  scriptural 
and  other  arguments  are  presented,  shoving  that  Chi 
death  was  intended,  and  was  actually  suffered,  for  all  men 
without  exception;  and  finally,  for  the  sake  of  those  who  are 
afraid  to  believe  any  thing  but  what  other  men  have  believed 
before  them,  Mr.  Goodwin  furnishes  extracts  in  their  own  words 
of  the  faith  on  the  subject  in  debate  of  many  of  the  Christian 
fathers  in  the  purest  age  of  the  Church,  as  Augustine,  Ambrose, 
Jerome,  Chrysostom,  Athanasius,  JTilarius,  Cyril  of  Jerusalem, 
Eusebius,  "Arnobius,  Didymus,  Basil,  Gregory  Xyssen,  Gregory 
Nazianzen,  Epiphanius,  Tertullian,  Origen,  Cyprian,  and  many 
others  ;  he  quotes  from  Calvin,  Peter  Martyr,  Bucer,  Parous, 
Gualter,  and  a  dozen  others  of  the  most  eminent  opponents  of 
the  views  advocated,     lie  says  of  these  testimonies  : 

My  intent  in  citing  Calvin  villi  those  other  laic  Protestant  writ- 
ers whom  we  have  joined  in  the  same  suffrage  in  favor  of  the 
doctrine  of  general  redemption,  is  not  to  persuade  the  reader  thai 
the  habitual  or  standing  judgment,  either  of  him  or  of  the  greater 
part  of  the  vest,  was  whole  and  entire  for  the  said  doctrine,  or  stood 
in  any  great  propension  hereunto,  (though  this  I  believe  concern- 
ing sundry  of  iliein.J  much  less  to  imply  that  they  never,  in  other 
places  of  their  writings,  declared  themselves  against  it,  but  only 
to  show,  1.  That  the  truth  of  this  doctrine  is  so  near  at  band  ;  and, 
2.  That  the  influence  of  it  is  so  benign  and  accommodatious  unto 
many  other  truths  and  doctrines  in  Christian  religion,  that  it 
is  a  hard  matter  for  those  that  deal  ranch  in  these  affairs  not  to 
assume  and  assert  it  ever  and  anon,  and  to  speak  and  to  argue 
many  things  on  the  authority  of  it  ;  yea,  though  extra  cas\ 
cessitatis  on  the  one  hand,  and  incogitantia  on  the  other,  they  arc 
wont  to  behold  it  as  God  doth  proud  men,  il  afar  off" 

It  vas  proposed  in  a  second  volume  to  answer  all  the  ol 
tions  to  the  doctrines  of  this  treatise  known  to  its  au 
Twenty-three  are  specified.     The.  doctrines  of  personal  eli 
and  reprobation,  infant  damnation,  and  universal  grace,  be 
intended  to  formally  discuss;  and.  also  to  include  in  the  volume 
an  exposition  of  the  ninth  of  Romans.     The  controversy    in 
which  he  became  involved  prevented  the  accomplishment  oi 
his  purpose,  which  would  have  rounded  out  this  great  work  to 


1SC9J  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  495 

the  manifest  advantage  ofi  the  world.  Nevertheless,  the  Ex- 
position, as  we  shall  see,  was  published  in  a  separate  form,  and 
Mr.  Goodwin's  views  on  the  questions  of  election  and  grace  are 
so  fully  stated  in  his  various  published  works  that  wc  are  left 
in  ignorance  of  them  on  no  important  point. 

In  what  sense  Goodwin  maintained  the  doctrine  of  uni- 
versal redemption  he  clearly  and  guardedly  declares.  He 
says : 

When,  with  the  Scriptures,  we  affirm  that  Chrisi  died  for  ali  i 
we  mean  that  there  was  reality  oi'  intention  on  God's  part,  that  as 
there  Avas  a  valuable  consideration  or  worth  of  merit,  in  the  d 
of  Christ,  fully  sufficient  for  the  ransom  or  redemption  of  all  men, 
so  it  should  be  equally,  and  upon  the  same  terms  applicable  to  ah 
men  in  order  to  their  redemption,  without  any  difference,  or  special 
bnhtation  of  it  to  some  more  than  others  ;  that  God  did  only  ante- 
cedently intend  the  actual  redemption  ami  salvation  oi*  all  men  in 
and  bv'the  death  of  Christ;  hut  consequently  the  redemption  and 
salvation  only  of  some,  namely,  those  who  shall  believe;  that  I 
is  a  possibility,  yea,  a  fair  and   gracious  possibility,  for  all 
without  exception,  considered  as  men,  without  and  before  their 
voluntary  obduration  by  actual  sinning,  to  obtain  actual  salvi 
by  his  death;  so  that  in  case  any  man  perisheth,  his  destructi 
altogether  from  himself,  there  being  as  much,  and  as  much  intende  1, 
in  the  death  of  Christ   toward  procuring  his  salvation  as  there  is 
for  procuring  the  salvation  of  any  of  those  who  come  to  he  act 
saved;  that  lie  not  only  put  ail  men  without  exception  into  a 
bility  of  being  saved,  as,  namely,  by  believing,  but  he  also  wholly 
off  from  all  men  Hie  guilt  and  condemnation  brought  upon  all  men 
by  Adam's  transgression,  so  thai   no  man  shall  perish  or  he  con- 
demned hut  upon  his  own  personal  account,  and  for  such  sins  ouly 
which  shall  he  actually  and  voluntarily  committed  by  him,  oi 
such  omissions  which  it  was  in   his   power  to  have   prevented; 
that  by  his  death  he  procured  this  grace  and  favor  with  I 
men  without  exception,  namely,  tluitthey  should  rec  ave  froi  i 
sufficient  strength  and  means,  or  be  enabled  bj  him,  to  repent  and 
to  believe,  yea,  and  to  persevere  m  both  to  the  end  ;  and  that  ( 
bv  his  death  purchased  this  transcendcnl  grace  also  and  favor  in 
the  Bi*h1  of  God  for  all  men  without  exception,  that  upou  I 
repenfanceand  believing  in  him  the)  should  be  justilied  and  receive 
forgiveness  of  all  their  sins,  and  that  upon  then  . 
unto  the  end   they  should  he  actually  ami 
imputation,  guilt  whereof  we  desire  in  special  i 

we-'    .  ncybythis 

1  old  universal  redemption,  so  we  hold  likewise  universal  sah 
or  that  all  men  shall  be  saved  by  Christ.     Such  an  oj.i 
b  no  consequent  of  the  doctrine  maintained  in  th 
me  it  seemeth  not  a  little  strange  how  any  man  professing  i 


496  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [October, 

tion  of  judgment  unto  the  Scriptures  should  ever  come  to  .1  con- 
federacy with  such  au  opinion.* 

The  theory  of  the  atonement,  as  held  by  Goodwin,  is  per- 
fectly apparent  from  numerous  passages: 

Being  Oeav0po)~or,  God  and  3fa?i,  or  man  subsisting  in  the  human 
nature  personally  united  to  the  Godhead,  by  the  willing  offering 
up  of  himself  as  a  Lamb  without  spot  in  sacrifice  unto  God  the 

Father,  he  made  atonement  for  .sinners.  The.  death  of  a  person  of 
that  transcendent  worth  and  dignity  was  judged  by  the  unerring 
understanding  and  wisdom  of  God  a  valuable  and  equitable  con- 
sideration why  he  should  actually,  and  without  any  other  ; 
intervening,  pardon  the  sin  of  the  world,  that  is,  the  sin  of  Adam 
as  imputed  or  communicated  in  the  guilt  of  it  to  all  his  posterity, 
together  with  all  the  actual  sins  of  all  such  of  his  posterity  as  should 
believe  in  him.  .  .  .  The  fullness  of  Christ's  satisfaction  is  not  to 
be  estimated  by  the  will  of  God  about  the  application  of  it,  or  the 
actual  communication  of  its  benefit  to  particular  men,  but  by  the 
proportion  which  it  bears  to  the  sin  to  which  it  relates  in  the  nature 
of  a  price,  ransom,  consideration,  or  satisfaction.  If  it  be  of  that 
nature,  consequence,  and  consideration  that  God  may,  with  the 
sufficient  demonstration  of  the  glory  of  his  justice.,  or  perfect  hatred 
of  sin,  or  wisdom,  etc,  pardon  sin  without  any  thing  added  by 
way  of  satisfaction  or  punishment,  it  is  in  reason  to  be  judged,  a 
sufficient  satisfaction,  although,  upon  some  other  account,  he  sus- 
pend the  benefit  or  actual  application  of  it  to  particular  men,  upon 
reasonable  requirements  of  them  otherwise,  f 

Further : 

Christ  is  said  to  have  made  an  atonement  for  the  sins  o^  men, 
because  lie  hath  so  far  pacified  and  reconciled  God  to  the  world,  that 
he.  is  willing,  notwithstanding  their  great  sin,  and  affront  put  1 
him,  to  oiler  terms  of  life  and  peace;  yet  so  that  they  who  will 
condescend,  or  rather  that  will  not  ascend,  to  the  terms  offered  by 
him,  that  is,  that  will  not  believe,  shall  have  no  further  benefit   by 
any  thing  he  hath  either  done  or  suffered  for  them.     Nor  will  it 
follow  that,  they  lor  whose  sins  Christ  hath  satisfied,  must  needs,  by 
virtue  of  that  satisfaction,  be  presently  justified  and  Baved;  or  that 
God  otherwise  should  be  unjust,  if,  having  received  satisfaction, 
he  should  condemn  men  for  those  sins  for  which  he  hath  been 
satisfied.     The  reason  is,  because  (he  satisfaction  of  Christ  !• 
an  ordinance  of  God  for  the  justification   and   salvation  of  men, 
merely  arbitrary,  and  depending  upon  his  will  and  pleasure,  as  well 
in  the  operation  as  in  the  being  of  it,  it   caunol   be  conceived  1  • 
extend  any  further,  nor  to  produce  its  effects  upon  any  other  terms, 
than  his  will  and  pleasure  is  that  it  should  produce  them.     Nov 
Scriptures  are  very  clear  in  this.,  that  the  gufti  ring*  of  Christ  do 
not  save  any  man  simply,  or  by  themselves,  but  through  a.  I 

*B  I,  page  662.  f  Banner  of  Ji  | 


1869J  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  497 

believing.  Notwithstanding  the  love  of  God  and  the  gift  of  Christ, 
without  believing  there  is  no  escaping  eternal  death,  because  that 
love  and  gift,  being  voluntary,  justify  and  f-nve  no  further,  on  no 
other  terms,  than  the  will  and  good  pleasure  of  God  i-  they  should.* 

The  relation  of  faith  to  the  atonement  is  set  forth  by  him 

with  a  remarkable  clearness: 

Christ  alone  justifieth  by  way  of  merit,  and  as  he  that  hath  pur- 
chased with  a  valuable  price,  the  laying  down  of  his  life,  the  ;_ 
of  justification  for  men.  Faith  justifies  instrumentally,  or  sub- 
serviently under  Christ,  namely,  as  a  conditional  act  required  by 
God  of  men  in  order  to  their  actual  investiture  with  that  grace  or 
benefit  of  justification  which  Christ,  by  the  merit  of  his  death,  pur- 
chased for  them;  yet  with  this  reservation  or  proviso,  that  the 
actual  communication  of  the  said  benefit  or  grace  unto  particular 
persons,  of  years  capable  of  believing,  should  be  suspended  until  it 
should  be  desired  by  them,  and  sought  for  by  believing.f 

The  commercial  theory  he  thoroughly  rejects,  and  a 
the  value  of  the  atonement  to  be  not  in  its  calculable  worth,  as 
though  just  so  much  suffering  had  been  endured  for  just  so 
much  sin,  but  in  its  demonstration  of  the  divine  justice,  so  that 
God  as  a  righteous  sovereign  can  oiler  pardon  upon  such  terms 
as  his  infinite  wisdom  may  be  pleased  to  dictate.  That  Christ 
died  sufficiently  and  intentionally  for  all  men  he  argues  over 
and  over  again,  against  objections  urged  this  day  with  as  much 
confidence  and  pertinacity  as  though  they  were  newly  dis- 
covered or  had  never  been  answered.  But  he  likewise  in 
that  in  the  eternal  punishment  of  the  unbeliever,  God  docs  not 
exact  a  second  satisfaction: 

That  satisfaction  which  Christ  made  for  the  --ins  of  any  p 
who  dies  in  unbelief  was  never  accepted  b)  God  in  the  nature  of 
an  appropriate,  particular,  or  actual  satisfaction  for  their  sii    . 
only  as  a  potential  satisfaction;  thai  is  as  of  value  enough  to  I 
made  a  particular  and  actual  satisfaction  for  such  a  man's  sins  as 
well  as  for  the  sins  of  those  who  believe,  and    which  he  fully 
intended  to  accept  for  such  a  satisfaction  on  his  behalf  in  ci 
had  believed.  .  .  .  Christ  neither  desired   nor  intended  to  • 
satisfaction  by  his  death  for  the  sin-  of  unbelievers  any  otln  r 
nor  upon  any  other  terms,  than  thai  God  the  Father  should,  upon  the 
account  thereof,  justify  such  persons  from  their  sins  in  easi 
should  have  believed;    and,  in  this  sense,  he  doth  accepl   H 
satisfaction  for  them,  being  more  ready  and  willing  to  pard  i 
the  sins  of  all  men,  as  well  theirs  who  never  will  believe,  m  case 

*  Divine  Authority  o  ires,  page  195.  f  Ex] 


498  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [October, 

they  should  believe,  as  well  as  theirs  who  shrill  believe  and  be 
actually  justified  thereupon.  So  that  God,  iu  compelling  unbelievers 
to  suffer  for  their  sius,  does  not  exact  a  second  satisfaction,  but 
only  puts  them  upon  payment  of  their  debt  themselves,  who  des- 
pised his  grace* 

Equally  clear  and  sharply  drawn  are  Lis  statement?,  of  pre- 
destination and  election.     He  remarks  : 

God  is  asserted  to  have  predestinated  or  purposed  so  many  of 
them,  be  they  fewer  or  be  they  more,  as  should  truly  believe, 
unto  life  and  glory;  and  the  residue,  be  they  fewer  or  be  they 
more,  namely,  all'  those  who  should  not  believe,  being  capable 
through  years  of  believing,  and  otherwise  competently  rational, 
unto  destruction.  Such  a  predestination  of  men  from  eternity  as 
this  the  Scriptures  clearly  and  frequently  hold  forth  ;  and  without 
controversv  such  a  predestination  as  this  is  fairly  and  fully  con- 
sistent with  the  glory  of  his  wisdom,  and  highly  magnifies  all  Ins 
attributes,  without  the  least  disparagement  of  any.  Whereas  that 
doomful  pretention,  that  blood  which  many  wring  out  of  the 
Scriptures  instead  o\'  milk,  hath  no  rational  or  intelligible  com- 
port at  all  with  any  of  them,  but  casts  a  kind'  of  spirit  of  obscu- 
rity and  contestation  upon  them  all.  f 

There  is  no  election  or  reprobation  from  eternity,  but  decrees 
of  election  and  reprobation  only.  There  is  no  reprobation  of  per- 
sons, because  it  is  impossible  there  should  be  any  persons  from 
eternity.  But  the  decrees  of  God  being  nothing  but  God  him- 
self, to  deny  such  decrees  from  eternity  is  to  deny  God.  But  tills 
is  that  which  I  deny :  that  these  decrees  respect  persons  y 
ally  considered.  They  only  rcspecl  species  of  men.  The  decree 
of  election  from  eternity  was,  that  whosoever  believes  should  be 
saved;  and,  on  the  contrary,  that  whosover  lives  and  dies  in  un- 
belief should  be  condemned:  this  is  the  decree  of  reproba 
There  is  no  other  de  :r<  e  of  election  and  reprobation  from  eternity 
but  this. J  The  tenor  of  God's  law  or  decree  of  election,  winch 
was  from  eternity,  is  this :  whosoever  shall  believe  in  my 
Jesus  Christ,  whom  I  purpose  to  send  into  the  world,  shall  here- 
upon become  a  man  of  that  species,  sort,  or  hind  of  men  whom  I 
have  chosen  from  among  all  other  men  or  torts  of  men  in. the 
world,  and  designed  for  salvation.  That  men  cannot,  in  propri- 
ety oi'  sp<  ech,  be  said  to  he  ,  lected  bom  eternity,  is  evident,  be- 
cause they  had  nobeii  ernity,  nothing  having  been  from 
eternity  but  God  himself  alone.§ 

NoCalvinist  ever  more  highly  exalted  divine  grace,  than  did 
John  Goodwin,  unless  it  be  in  il  •  allege  I  irresistibleness,  which, 
in  his  view,  absolutely  destroys  its  very  nature  as  free  grace. 

*  IJniinor  of  Justifica  f  Redem]  IM 

%  Pebr.tc  with  Simpson,  ;'  J;.!  n  ption  Redeemed,  page  33-1. 


1869.]  Memorabilia  of  John-  Goodwin.  499 

For  its  office  is  to  aid  and  bless  men  ;  but  if  it  necessitates  (heir 
believing,  it  render.-  their  faith  unrewardable : 

l\"o  law,  no  rule  of  justice  or  equity,  provideth  any  reward  for 
such  actions,  to  the  performance  whereof  the  doers  are  necessi- 
tated by  a  strong  ami  irresistible  hand.     There  is  more  reason  of 
the  two  why  merely  natural  actions,  as  eating,  drinki 
ing_,  walking,  etc.,  should  be  rewarded  by  God,  thau 
actions  whereunto   men  are  necessitated  by  a  power  extra-e 
tial  to  them.* 

All  ability  to  faith,  he  taught,  is  of  grace;  and  no  man  ex- 
ercises that  ability  without  the  immedii  te  assistance  of  grace: 

The  act  of  believing,  whensoever  it  is  ]  erformed,  is  at  so  low  a 
rate  of  efficiency  from  a   man's  self,  that,  to  help  apprehensi 

little  in  the  case,  suppose  the  act  could  be  divided  into  a  thou- 
sand parts,  nine  hundred  and  ninety  nine  of  them  are  to  be  as- 
cribed unto  the  free  grace  of  God,  and  only  the  remaining  one 
unto  man.  Yea,  this  one  i:;  no  otherwise  to  be  ascribed  to  man, 
than  as  graciously  supported,  strengthened,  and  i  v  the 

free  grace  of  God.  I  attribute  as  much  as  possibly  can  be  attrib- 
utcd  to  the  fruc  grace  of  God  in  the  act  of  believing,  saving  the 
attributablcness  of  the  action  to  man  himself,  in  the  lowest  and 
most  diminutive  sense  that  can  well  be  conceived.  For  certain 
it  is,  that  it  is  the  creature  man,  not  God,  or  the  Spirit  of  God, 
that  believeth  ;  and  therefore  of  necessity  there  must  so  much, 
or  such  a  degree,  of  efficiency. about  it  be  left  unto  man,  which 
may  with  truth  give  it  the  denomination  of  being  his.  And  they 
that  go  about  to  interest  the  free  grace  of  God  in  the  act  of 
believing  upon  any  other  terms,  or  so  that  the  act  itself  cannot 
truly  be  called  the  act  of  man,  are  injurious  in  the  highest  mau- 
ner  to  the  grace  of  God  ;  I  this  i  lain  turn.f 

While  he  held  that  no  person,  without  the  assistance  «>f 
grace,  has  any  power  or  disposition  to  will  any  tiling  go  >d,  or 
to  repent  or  believe,  he  most  strongl)  taught  the  freedom  of 
the  will,  as  restored  through  Christ : 

All  persons,  without  exception,  are  put    into  an  actual  po 
sionofthc  favor  of  God  by  his  grace  in  tin  ■■'•'■•  of  Jesus  Christ, 
which  possession  they  keep  during  infancy,  and  until  the  commis- 
sion of  actual  sin  ;  [and  j  all  men  living  to  years  of  discretion,  and 
more    especially   while  I    yet    foull]  1  or 

wretchedly  hardened  themselves  by  long  continuance  in  wn 
known  sins,  arc,  by  the  same  grace  pi  ood   capacity  of 

solvation;  so   that    if  they   be  uol  wanting  to  tli 
may,  by  the  1)  afed  to  th  i  repent   aud 

licve,  and  persevere  believing  unto  salvation."! 

*  Agreement  and  Distance  of  Brethren.  \  I 

of  Brethren. 


500  M&morabttia  of  John,  Goodwin.  [October, 

The  fall  exposition  of  his  doctrine  of  the  liberty  of  the  will 
we  have  lost  by  bis  failure  to  complete  the  "  Redemption  Re- 
deemed;" but  in  the  volume  given  as  be  argues  at  .considerable 
length  the  proposition  that  God  1ms  vouchsafed  to  all  men  a 

sufficiency  of  moans  (inclusive  of  power)  to  be  saved;  showing 
that  otherwise  God  deals  with  men  more  severely  under  the 
covenant  of  grace  than  he  did  under  the  covenant  of  works, 
and  also  than  he  does  with  the  devils  themselves;  that  far  the 
greater  part  of  men  will  be  damned  for  what  is  no  sin,  that  is, 
for  not  doing  what  they  cannot  and  never  could  do;  that  our 
Saviour's  wonder  at  the  unbelief  of  men  was  without  the  least 
ground ;  that  only  by  the  gift  of  adequate  power  to  believe 
can  the  unsaved  be  left  without  excuse,  and  the  mouths  of  the 
wicked  be  stopped  ;  and  that 

If  God,  knowing  that  an  ungodly  man  is  in  (he  utmost  danger 
of  perishing  forever,  and  withal,  that  he  hath  no  power  to  re- 
pent  and  believe,  shall  yet  vehemently  and  affectionately  urge, 
press,  and  persuade  such  a-  man  to  repent  and  believe,  that  he 
may  not  perish,  such  an  application  as  this  can  bear  no  other  con- 
struction than  as  derisory,  and  proceeding  from  one  who  doth  not 
simply  delight  in  the  death  of  a  sinner,  but  to  make  the  death  ot' 
such  a  miserable  creature  as  full  of  gall  and  bitterness  as  he  well 
knows  how  to  do.  lie  rather  insults  over  him  in  bis  extremity 
of  weakness  and  misery,  than  really  intends  any  tiling  gracious 
and  of  a  saving  import  to  him.* 

We  have  thus  presented  some  of  the  leading  features  of 
Goodwin's  theological  system.  The  universal  and  absolute 
depravity  of  the  race,  the  Godhead  of  Christ,  the  personality 
and  Deity  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  the  infallibility  and  inspiration 
of  the  Scriptures,  the  atonement  by  the  death  of  Christ,  its 
availability  upon  the  sole  condition  of  faith,  and  the  u< 
of  the  aid  of  the  Holy  Spirit  in  order  to  repentance  and  holi- 
ness, are  doctrines  which  ho  unwaveringly  held,  and  upon 
which  he  employed  his  vigorous  pen.  But  it  is  rather  Ins 
views  on  the  poiuts  in  debate  between  the  schools  of  Calvin 
and  Arminius  which  have  occupied  our  attention,  am 
have  found  him  soundly  and  thoroughly  Anuiuian.  While 
some  of  th-.-  followers  of  Arminius  would  .-ay  that  God  elected 
from  eternity  certain  persons  to  eternal  life  in  view  of  theii 
foreseen  faith  and  holiness,  Goodwin  denied  any  personal  elec 
*  Redemption  Redeemed,  page  t>:>r>. 


1869.]  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  501 

•tion  whatever  from  eternity,  and  admitted  only  the  broad  de- 
cree that  a  certain  sort  of  persons  should  receive  eternal  glory. 
and  another  certain  sort  should  receive  eternal  death.  We 
think  him  right.  It  is  certainly  difficult  to  answer  his  argu- 
ment, and  we  know  of  nothing  in  the  Scriptures  that,  rightly 
interpreted,  conflicts  with  his  view.  Ir  was  in  the  study  >A~  the 
Scriptures  rather  than  of  the  metaphysics  of. the  question  that 
lie  found  the  key  to  the  system  which  he  subsequently  advo- 
cated with  so  great  power.  Christ  Jesus,  he  read,  tasted  death 
fur  every  man;  and  around  that,  as  the  central  point,  all  the 
doctrines  of  his  theology  must  stand.  Whatever  is  inconsist- 
ent with  this  fundamental  truth  he  unhesitatingly  rejects  how- 
ever precious  it  may  have  previously  been  held;  and  whatever 
accords  with  it,  however  unpalatable  before,  is  heartily  ac- 
cepted. There  was,  therefore,  nothing  to  conceal,  nothing 
held  as  truth  which  he  could  not  openly  and  freely  declare.  As 
is  the  case  with  all  true  Arminians  cvery-where,  he  had  no  doc- 
trines which  he  could  not  proclaim  to  the  world  at  anytime, 
and  which  must  be  kept  in  shadow  only  as  they  might  be 
safely  delivered  to  the  ears  of  the  initiated  few  on  select 
occasions. 

It  was  very  easy  for  his  enemies  to  charge  Goodwin  with 
Socinianism  and  Pelagianism  ;  but  only  the  bitterness  and  ran- 
cor of  men  bent  upon  his  rain  could  have  accused  him  of  the 
former  in  view  of  hi::  published  words,  while  the  apolo< 
ignorance  of  either  Arminianism  or  Pelagianism,  and  perhaps 
of  both,  may  suffice  for  the  latter,    li  i-  true  that  many  tli 
gianSj  in  both  Holland  and  England,  who  rejected  the  /tor 
deoretum  of  the  Genevan    master,  were  therefore  classe< 
Arminians, although  on  the  questions  of  original  sin  and  j 
tication  by  faith  they  dissented  from  the  views  of  Arminius 
and  Calvin  alike.     They  were  Arminians  in  nVproper  e 
and  yet,  for  the  sake  of  them  and  th  '  ■      ■  -.    ' 

followers  of  Arminius  have  been  compelled  I  >beartV 
of  Pelagianism.     But  Goodwin  did  no)  '■ 
charge  upon    his  opponents,  and  with    r  :      >r  the  main 

que  i  ion  between  Augustine  and  Pelagius  was  " 
Christ  be  truly  the  mediator  of  all  nun/'  as  hecould  not  b< 
the  latter  alleged,  men  are  not  fallen  in  Adam, and  may  attain 
holiness  withont  the  aid  of  divine  grace.     If* 

Fourth  Series,  Vol,  XXI.— 32 


S02  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [October 


they  need  no  atonement,  and  the  doctrine  of  universal  redemp- 
tion is  false.      In  original  sin  Pelagius  did  not  believe,  and  it 
cannot  be  shown  that  he  held  the  universality  of  the  atonen 
Nevertheless,  Arminius,  Goodwin,  "Wesley,  and  theMeth 
have  been  to  this  day  stigmatized  as  Pelagians  by  a  specie.-,  of 
theological  quackery  that  was  bad  enough  in  the.  seventi 
century,  but  is  intolerable  and  inexcusable  in  the  nineteenth. 

Ecclesiastically,  Goodwin,  though  an  Episcopalian  until  the 
abolition  of  Episcopacy,  was  an  Independent.     Indeed,  he- 
could  under  the  circumstances  hold  no  other  position  consi 
ently  with  his  opinions  respecting  liberty  of  conscience.     His 
advocacy  of  the  Congregational  system  was  based  upon  the 
■conviction   that   only  by  its  prevalence  could  a  true  religious 
toleration  prevail,  and  was  therefore  more  a  protest  against  on 
authoritative  Presbyterianism  than  an  assertion  of  Independ- 
ency as  the  only  system  that  is  in  harmony  with  the  Scrip- 
tures.    "I  know  that  1  am  looked  upon,"  he  observed,  "  as  a 
man   very  deeply  engaged  for  the  Independent  cause  ag 
Presbytery.     But  the  truth  is,  I  am  neither  so  whole  for  the 
former,  nor  against  the  latter,  as  I  am  generally  voted  to  be." 
For  the  purposes  of  "building  up  himself  in  holiness,  and  the 
promotion  of  spiritual  religion,  his  choice  wa.s  for  thos 
wisely  made;  nevertheless,  it  is  not  difficult  to  see  thai  ' 
he  living  in  our  day,  a  day  of  the  fullest  recognition  of  the 
rights  of  conscience,  his  true  place  would  be  found   under 
another  standard. 

Only  a  well-balanced  mind  could  have  retained  it-  equanimity 
and  avoided  all  expression  or  indulgence  of  bit!  when 

-exposed  to  the  suspicions,  the  harassing.-,  the  conspiracy 
public  assaults,  the  published  defamations,  the  incessani  con- 
troversies, :'H'!  the  attempted  destructions  that  dogged  bis  path 
for  more  than  a  quarter  of  a  century.  Never  :  original  as- 
sailant, except  in  the  single  instance  of  his  attack  upon  ( ' 
wolfs  Triers  and  Ejectors  of  Ministers,  ho  svas  yel  almost 
continually  involved  in   c  Bui  11  wj     nol   to  his 

taste,  however  admirably  his  great  learuinj  1  powers 

fitted  him  for  it.  lie  wrote  nothing  in  self-defense  unti 
was  openly  charged  with  heresy  and  blasphemy.  In  the  i 
to  one  of  the  most  abusive  and  scurrilou  ver  made 

upon  him  he  said  : 


1800.]  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  503 

The  great  Searcher  of  hearts  knowcth  that  if  liimself  would  dis- 
charge me  of  the  service  ul'  contradicting  aud  opposing  men,  and 
dispose  of  me  in  a  way  of  retirement,  were  it  never  so  private  and 
obscure,  where  I  might  only  contest  with  my  own  weakness  and 
errors,  he  should  give  me  one  of  the  first-born  desires  of  ray 
As  for  revenge,  my  thoughts  hardly  sutler  me  to  conceive  of  it  as 
consisting  with  those  things  that  accompany  salvation.     I  v  i; 
were  as  easy  for  others  to  forbear  injuring  me,  as  it  is  for  i 
neglect  and  pass  it  by  when  they  have  done  it.   \Vhosoever  burden 
me  with  the  crimes  of  ambition  and  revenge,  certain  I  am  that 
they  are  strangers  to  my  spirit  and  converse. 

To  the  low  personalities,  the  coarseness,  the  vitnperation,  that 
so  sadly  disfigure  most  of  the  controversial  writings  of  tl  at 
day,  and,  with  scarcely  an  exception,  those  of  his  antagonists, 
he  never  descended;  lie  rather  pressed  his  points  with 
statement,  strong  argument,  sharp  analysis,  keenness  in  detec- 
tion of  a  fallacy,  and  great  facility  in  exposure  of  an  absurdity. 
He  was  a  gentleman,  as  well  as  a  scholar  and  a  Christian. 
Nevertheless,  it  must  not  be  thought  that  he  never  sharpened 
his  pen  to  a  point.  Hisscathing  analysis  of  Dr.  Owen's  style 
of  reasoning  in  his  reply  to  the  "  Redemption  Redeemed" 
might  be  read  to-day  with  profit  by  the  admirers  of  the  Magnus 
Apollo  of  the  Calvinian  orthodoxy,  lie  could  be  witty  as 
M*ell  as  sharp.  ';  As  for  passion,"  he  says,  "  I  am  not  conscious 
of  writing  by  it,  unless  haply  it  be  when  1  meet  with  Ignorance 
riding  in  triumph  upon  Confidence's  back;"  and  then  he  could 
be  terribly  severe.  His  catholicity  was  in  marked  contrast 
with  the  bigotry  around  him,  reminding  us  not  unfrequently 
of  the  great  Arminian  of  a  century  later,  his  successor  to  vials 
of  theological  wrath  as  well  as  to  the  work  of  theological  reform. 
As  a  preacher,  he  was  clear,  eloquent,  spiritual,  and  well  fitted 
to  shine  among  the  most  brilliant  pulpit  oral  age. 

Multitudes  thronged  his  church  and  hung  delighted  apon  h;< 
lips.    But  his  eminent  abilith  s,  whether  of  pen  or  speech,  were 
consecrated  first  of  all  to  his   work  as   past  »r.     In  t'i  ' 
especially  delighted,  rightly  esteeming  the  spiritual  growth 
and    unity  of  his  J!  lii   Licr  moment  than  the  more 

public  tasks  to  which  he  was  providentially  called. 

In  exposition  of  Scripture,  Good  . mfs  excellence  is  quil 
mirked  as  in  theological  argument.     Rejecting  the  peculiar 
method  of  many  of  his  contemporaries,   which    assigned   n 
meaning  to  insulated   texts  with  no  regard  to  the 


504  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  [Oc1 

which  the  original  writer  used  the  words,  a  practice  by  which 
the 'greatest  aburdities  may  be  maintained— and  which,  by  the 
way,  has  not  yet  been  entirely  abandoned— while  he  lays  suffi- 
cient stress  unon  the  import  of  the  words,  he  always  con  ; 
the  passage  in  hand  in  connection  with  the  argument  of  which 
it  forms  a  part.     What  he  says  of  his  "Exposition,   of  the 
Ninth  Chapter  of  the  Epistle  to  the  RomaDs,"  is  equallj 
of  the  numerous    expositions  of  briefer   passages      ■ 
throughout  his  works.     "  I  have  not  willingly  wrested    any 
phrase,  word,  syllable,  or  letter;  but  have  with  all  simplicity 
of  heart,  and  as  in  the  sight  of  God,  followed  the  most  ge 
ducture  of  the  context  and  scope  from  place  to  place,  consult- 
ing, without  partiality,  all  circumstances  which  occurred 
which  I  could  think  of,  in  order  to  a  due  steerage  of  my  judg- 
ment in  every  tiling."  The  Exposition  of  the  Ninth  of  Romans, 
extending  through   three  hundred  and  sixty  octavo  pag 
one  of  the  most  valuable  of  his  publications.     It  rests 
the  theory  that  St.  Paul  is,  in  that  chapter,  vindicating  v  ■ 
real  or  supposed  objections  of  the  Jews  his  dec-trine  of  j n 
cation  by  fait  li,  for  the  willful  rejection  of  which  their  own  I 
tion  was  nigh  at  hand,  and  that  he  is  not  at  serting  any  absolute 
and  personal  election  and  reprobation  of  men  from  eternity. 
Thoroughly  acquainted  with  the  interpretation  then  comm 
•received,  he  successfully  meets  it  at  every  point;    whil 
also  beautifully  expounds  the  chapter  upon  his  own  tl 
and  finally,  from  its  closing  verses,  demonstrates  that  he  has 
correctly  stated   the  Apostle's    meaning.      As  a  part  oi 
promised  second  part  of  the  "Redemption  Redeemed,"  tl 
"Exposition"   merits   a  high  place  in  theological    literature, 
as  well  as  for  itsown  intrinsic  worth. 

Goodwin's  political,  or  rather  his  politico-religions  writi 
originated  in  his  profound  convictions  in  behalf  of  relij 
liberty.      He  was  no  revolutionist.      Jle  believed  in  a  sti 
stable-  o\    n  went  that  would  protect  the  rights  of  the  p< 
and  the  government  defacfowas  that  which  he  conscii  ntiously 
served.     ;'  From  first  to  la  t,"   he  says  of  hie  self,  "  I 
stood  by  the  Authorityfor  the  time  1  have  cont< 

for  a  universal  subjection  in  all  things  lawful  unto  it.     \ 
there  were  two  Authoritic  tng,  that  of  the   Kii 

the  other  of  Parliament,  I  joined  that  which  ]  judged 


1869.]  Memorabilia  of  John  Goodwin.  505 

pleadable,  and  most  promissory  of  civil  and  religious  I 
ncss."    He  defended  the  parliamentary  cause  by  his  pen,  and 
endeavored  to  restrain  it  from  self-destruction  by  opposing  its 
projects  of  Presbyterian  supremacy.     He  sustained  Cromwell 
in  the  Commonwealth,  and  wrote  severely  against  his  measures 
for  only  a  limited  toleration.      "My  great  desij  n  in  givii 
Caesar,"  Le  says,  "that  which  I  know  to  be  Cses:  r's,  is, 
thereby  I  may  purchase  the  more  equitable  liberty  to 
to  Caesar  that  winch  1  know  is  not  his.   And  if  Caesar,  whoever 
he  be,  careth  not  to  be  served  upon  such  an  account,  he  must 
wait  for  relief  till  I  am  dead."    The  Parliament  n  warded  him 
with   expulsion  from  his  vicarage,  and  Cromwell  with  only 
protection  from  personal  violence.     Honors  and  emolun 
were  not  for  him  who  demanded  the  most  urn  free- 

dom for  conscience,  and  was  at  the  same  time  an  Arminian, 


Art.  IL— WUTTKE  OX  PRE-PLATONIC  ETHICS.* 

Christian  ethics  cannot  he  understood  apart  from  its  history, 
nor  the  latter  apart  from  the  history  of  the  systems  that  pre- 
ceded or  lay  outside  of  Christianity;  but  the  hi  tory  of  ethics 
presupposes  a  knowledge  of  the  historical  devi  ' 
ethical  consciousness  in  general,  of  which  ethics  itself  is  simply 
the  scienl  ific  fruit.  The  oue-sidedness  of  the  more  rec 
is  largely  due  to  inattention  to  its  history. 

MOK.\L   CONSCIOUSNESS    AND   ETHICS   OF   HEATHEN   NATIONS. 

I.  Though  the  majority  of  heathen  nations  have  had  co 
tions  of  moral,  semi-religious  life-rules,  yet,  until  tl 
age  of  Greek  philosophy,  tiny  lacked  systems  of  ethi  -  pr 
The  ground-character  of  all  heathen  ethi  ;al  < 
of  heathen  ethics  is  this :  the  origin  and  goal  of  the  ethi< 
not  an  infinite  spiritu  ither  an  imp  irsonal 

ral,  or  a  merely  individual!,  al.     The  ori 

*  This  article  is  a  free  translation  from  ruttke's 

'    :i  Sittenlchre,  found  In  the 

Methodist  Quart*  rlj  !.'■  view,  January,  1500. 


506  Wuttteon  Pre-Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

infinite  Spirit,  and  the  goal  not'the  perfecting  of  the  moral 
personality  in  a  divine  kingdom  based  on  the  moral  perf 
of  its  members,  and  in- the  communion  of  the  individual  with 
the  infinite  personality  of  God;  but  always  simply  alii 
good,  whether  a  merely  earthly  civil  perfection,  with  th 
noring  of  an  extra  mundane  goal,  (the  Chinese,)  or  the  enti 
renunciation  of  personal   existence,  (the  Indians,)  or  a  merelj 
individual  perfection,  apart  from  the  idea  of  a  divine  kingdom 
raising  individuals  into  becoming  its  living  members,  (tl  e  Egyp- 
tians, Persians,  Greeks,  Germans.)     Throughout  there  is  lac 
a  recognition  of  true  moral  freedom  :  either  it  is  expressly  denied, 
or  ascribed  only  to  a  few  specially-gifted  ones;  while  the  re  t 
of  mankind  are,  as  barbarians,  incapable  of  moral  freedom  and 
perfection.     There  is,  therefore,  entirely  lacking,  also,  a  recog- 
nition of  humanity  in  its  entirely,  as  called  to  the  accomj 
ment  of  a  moral  life-task.     It  is  always  simply  a  single  nation, 
or  an  aristocratic  section  of  a  nation  that  is  ethically  active. 
The  slave  is  incapable  of  true  morality. 

Where,  however,  humanity  itself  is  called  to  morality,  (the 
Buddhist--.)  there  the  life-task  is  essentially  negative,  and  di- 
rected to  the  annihilation  of  personal  existence.  Throughout 
there  is  lacking  a  recognition  of  the  moral  corruption  of  the 
natural  man,  and  consequently  of  the  need  of  a  new  birth; 
morality  is  not  so  much  a  struggle  as  rather  a  simple  devel- 
opment. There  is  noticeable^  it  is  true,  a  consciousness  of  im- 
moral states  of  mankind,  even  of  natural  incapacity  for  ;  '  ; 
but  the  former  are  generally  attributed  to  mere  civic  and  indi- 
vidual degeneration,  and  the  latter  confined  to  barbarian-  and 
slaves.  The  idea  of  the  highest  good,  however,  is  either  only 
negatively  embraci  d  or  referred  to  earthly  weal,  or  left  enti 
in  doubt,  or  at  besl  .-ought  in  mere  individual  perfection. 

Bat  more  in  detail.     The  heathen  moral  consciousness  can 
of  course  be  understood  only  in  connection  with  the  reli« 
consciousness  upon  which,  for  the  time  boh;-,  it  rests, 
we  have,  of  the  majority  of  heathen  nations,  only  loosely  joini  I 
moral  maxims,  pr<      rb  .  i  tc,  but  no  ethic;.!  .-;.  r  our 

comprehension  of  their  moral  consciousnei  .  no  loss,  since  such 
systems  arc  always  stamped  more  or  less  with  the  subjectivity 
of  their  author--.;  whereas  ma:  ims,  pi-ovt  rbs,  etc.,  are  an  objec- 
tive, unclouded  reflection  of  the  moral  conscious         of  a  nation. 


1869.]  WuWkeon  Pre -Platonic  Ethics.  507 

As  it  is  the  essence  of  heathenism  to  conceive  of  God  as  in 
some  way  limited,  so  is  its  moral  consciousness  correspondingly 
defective.  Is  God  viewed  as  an  nnspiritual  nature-deity  \  Then 
is  morality  stamped  with  un-freedom,  and  is  either  a  passive 
submission  to  the  general,  eternally  uniform  course  of  nature 
and  of  civil  authority,  (the  Chinese,)  or  a  renunciation  of  the 
human  personality  to  nature  conceived  as  a  divinity  with  whom 
human  freedom  is  inconsistent,  (the  Indians.)  Is  Clod  con- 
ceived as  limited  and  individual,  and  consequently  as  plurality  '. 
Then  is  the  human  soul  viewed  as  not  in  absolute  moral  de- 
pendence on  him,  but  as  relatively  coeval  with  him,  and  as  not 
having  the  divine  will  as  its  unconditional  law.  Morality  is, 
in  the  main,  subjective  and  variable;  the  self-love  and  selfish 
pride  of  the  vigorous  individual  appear  as  the  justifiable  m 
motive  of  the  moral  life,  (Western  Asia  and  Europe.) 

With  such  views  the  goad  of  moral  striving,  the  highest  good, 
can  appear  only  as  something  limited.  Among  naturalistic 
nations  (the  Chinese  and  Indians)  it  is  devoid  of  positive  char- 
acter, and  looks  only  to  the  greatest  possible  merging  of  per- 
sonality into  impersonal  nature.  In  China  the  moral  spirit  can 
attain  to  nothing  which  did  not  already  from  nature,  that  is, 
necessity,  always  exist.  The  task  is  not  to  create  a  moral  king- 
dom, but  only  to  preserve  and  passively  subordinate  one's 
worthless  personality  to  the  (independently  of  all  per 
action  already  existing)  eternal  kingdom  of  necessitated  order. 
In  India,  both  among  the  Brahmins  and  the  Buddhists,  where 
the  consciousness  of  the  personal  spirit  is  awakened  to  a  much 
higher  degree,  the  moral  struggle  assumes  a  truly  tragic  char- 
acter, in  that  the  entire  direct  antagonism  of  the  per 
spirit  with  the  therewith  hostile  nature-God  com 
recognition.  The  highest  goal  of  the  soul  is  not  only  not  a 
positive  one,  not  even  the  preservation  of  the  eternally  uniform 
order  of  nature,  but  the  absorption  vi'  personal  being  into  un- 
conditioned nature;  the  highest  good  is  complete  self-annihila- 
tion through  moral  activity.  Among  western  hido-Germanic 
nations  human  personality  is  not  extinguished,  for  there  the 
divine  is  conceived  of  as  personal.  I3ul  as  the  divii 
conceived  as  a  limited  personality,* or  al  least  only  in  the 
esoteric  heights  of  philosophy,  as  infinite,  the  certainty  of 
the  moral  goal  is  shaken.     The  personal  bpiril  ot  to 


508  Wutikeon  Pre-Platonic Ethics.  [October, 

vanish  in  (he  tumult  of  the  great  world-organism,  as  in  China, 
or  to  sink  into  the  nameless  unconditioned  Bn  hm  orNervaua, 
as  in  India,  but,  on  the  contrary,  to  attain  a  positive  result. 
For  this,  however,  it  finds  no  unshaken  basis.  As  the  individual 
here  sinks  tragically,  a  victim  of  fate  or  of  envious  deit : 
is  his  recompense  in  the  world  to  come  entirely  doubtful. 
Achilles  longs  to  return  from  the  state  of  the  departed,  even  in 
the  position  of  a  servant.  Socrates  is  not  certain  that  for  his 
philosophic  virtue,  he  will  have  the  pleasure  of  converse  with 
the  eminent  dead.  At  best,  doubting  hope  looks  only  for  a 
merely  individual  well-being;  and  the  idea  of  an  actual  divine 
kingdom,  with  its  roots  in  man's  earthly  moral  life  and  its 
crown  in  its  post-mundane  perfection,  and  whose  essence  is  the 
history  of  humanity,  is  unknown  even  to  the  most  enlightened 
heathendom.  True,  moral-freedom  is  actually  denied  only  by 
a  few  of  the  more  consistent  philosophers  "of  India,  though  in 
no  ease  is  it  thoroughly  admitted.  In  China  it  is  stilled  under 
all-regulating  imperial  Jaw  ;  among  the  Brahu  Ins  it  is  admit- 
ted only  in  a  very  limited  degree,  and  all  personal  initiative 
regarded  as 'unjustifiable,  or  rather,  as  mere  illusion.  Imper- 
sonal Brahm  is  the  only  real  existence.  The  Greeks,  even  in 
their  highest  philosophy,  ascribe  moral  self-determination  not 
to  mankind,  but  only  to  the  free  Greek.  Tie  barbarian  is 
only  a  half-man,  incapable  of  true  virtue,  and  called  not  to 
moral  freedom,  but  only  to  unfree  service  under  the  tree  Greek. 
A  universal  human  morality  i>  not  recognized  even  by  Aristotle. 

Among  the  chief  imperfections  of  heathen  ethics  is  the  total 
lack  of  the  idea  of  humanity.  Buddhism,  the  sole  system  thai 
breaks  over  the  barriers  of  nationality,  docs  so  only  because  of 
its  negative  character,  because  in  its  conviction  of  the  nullity 
of  all  being  even  the  differences  of  rare  also  vanish  ;  but  this 
morality  does  not  aim  to  build  up  a  spiritual  kingdom  of  ethi- 
cal reality,  bat  contrarily,  to  free  the  soul  from  all  reality,  even 
its  own  personal  existence. 

Human  depravity  iinds  in  heathendom  only  fainl   recogni- 
tion.    For  the  Chines*  all  reality  is  good.     The 
is  mirror-smooth  ;  and  if,  perchance,  a  .-light  ripple  ]  ' 
Burface,  a  moment's  calut  suffices  for  its  vanishment,     b 
Indian  all  existence  is  equally  good  ami  equall    I 
a  form  of  God  ;  bad,  as  transient  or  deceptiv< .     '• 


1869.]  Wutike  on  Pre-Platonic  1  509 

with  God,  witb  the  universe.     Man  suffers  from  the  falseness 
of  the  world,  but  has  not  occasioned  it. 

The  Persian  comes  nearer  the  truth.  Mankind,  in  his  view, 
is  really  morally  depraved;  and  thai  because  of  moral  j 
because  of  a  fall  from  the  good;  and  man  musl  morally 
struggle  against  the  evil  and  for  the  good.  But  the  fall 
exterior  to  the  sphere  'of  hnman  action  and  guilt— lies  in  the 
sphere  of  the  divine.  Not  the  rational  creature  bnl  a  god  has 
falleu.  The  divine  exists  as  a  hostile  duality,  the  Grood  Being 
in  contest  from  thebeginning  villi  the  Evil.  The  world,  both 
moral  and  natural,  is  the  work  of  botli  these  antagonistic 
beino-3.  The  moral  weakness  of  tins  system  lies  in  the  fact 
that,  throwing  the  guilt  back  upon  the  divinity,  it  deprives 
man's  moral  efforts  of  their  true  and  strongest  motive  ;  but  with 
the  Greeks  even  this  partial  truth  of  the  Persian:  is  thrown 
into  the  background  by  the  notion  of  an  inner  actual  harmony. 
That  which  in  Christianity  is  the  moral  goal  is  here  conceived 
as  an  already  and  necessarily  existing  reality;  so  that  in  o 
to  the  attaining  of  this  highest  good,  man  has  only  to  d.e\ 
the  essentially  faultless  germ  of  his' actual  spiritual  being.  Of 
a  positive  struggle  against  the  might  of  an  actually  indwelling 
evil  even  the  greatest  philosophers  have  no  conception ;  and 
what  of  manifest  evil  did'ibrce  itself  upon  their  sounder  prac- 
tical -jud-anent  was  by  their  intense  self-complacence  sought 
not  in  man  himself;  but  beyond  him,  either  in  the  spin  I 
the  gods  who,  even  in  the  hands  of  the  more  moral  poets,  ap- 
pear as  morally  stained  and  justly  roproachable,  or  beyond  the 
god-sphere,  in  irrational  fate,  or  in  non-Greek  mankind,  who 
as  barbarians  are  morally  degenerated.  By  tar  the  highest 
heathen  conception  of  morality  and  guilt  is  found  among  the 
ancient  Germanic  nations. 

J  J.  The  moral  notions  of  savages  lie  outsid  Id  of  his- 

tory.    The  gentler  of  the  half-civilized  peoples,  the  Mexicans, 
and  especially  the  Peruvians,  broughl  social  morality  to  some 
perfection;  but  it  appeal's  to  have  been  a  thing  rather  of  < 
rooted  custom  than  of  clear,  conscio    ness.    1        moral  <    i 
sciousness  of  the  Chine-..  ply  d  ivcloj  cd  as  1 

merest  minutiae  of  life,  and  contained  in  numerous  holy-es- 
teemed writings,  is,  without  higher  ideas,  merely  empirically 
comprehensible,  purely  civic,  and  looking  only  to  an  external 


510  Wutike  on  Pre -Platonic  Ethics.  [Octobei 


fitness.  The  essence  of  this  morality  is  a  quiet  conformance  to 
changeless  order.,  a  preservance  of  the  happy  mean,  "without 
any  consciousness  of  a  lost  and  to-be-regained  perfection  of  the 
race.  It  presupposes  entire  goodness  of  human  nature,  perfect 
harmony  of  reality  and  ideal.  It  looks  not  to  the  sanctification 
of  an  unholy  reality,  but  to  the  modeling  of  the  individual  after 
purely  human  patterns. 

The  bright  point  in  Chinese  morality  is  obedience  in  family 
and  state;  its  chief*  trait  is  a  passive  remaining  in  the  move- 
ment of  the  whole,  an  even  pulse-stroke  whose  meaning  is  not 
in  a  goal  but  in  the  movement  itself. 

But  more  fully.  The  religion  of  the  Chinese  is  a  pra 
and  consistent  naturalism,  and  is  rich  in  moral  maxims.  It 
was  reduced  to  system  about  GOO  .B.  C.  by  Confucius.  Uni- 
versal life,  even  in  its  spiritual  phrase, bears  here  a  naturalistic 
stamp;  there  is  no  notion  of  a  morally-attainable  spiritual 
goal,  but  only  01  an  eternally  self-repeating  course  of  nature  ; 
morality  looks  not  forward,  but  only  backward  upon  what  has 
been  and  ever  shall  be;  and  all  amelioration  of  an  unfor- 
tunate present  is  mere  return  to  the  previous  better.  The 
moral  goal  is  not  progress,  but  preservation  of,  or  return  to,  the 
past. 

The  ideal  is  not  yet  to  be  attained,  but  properly  has  already, 
with    only  transient    becloud ir.gs,     always    been     p 
Humanity  is,  without  development,  already  perfect.    Morality 
aims  not  to  produce  something  that  was  not,  but  only  io  heal 
a  slight  disturbance  of  what  already  was.     The  highest  j 
is  not  a  goal  and  aim,  but  mere  existence  itself.     The  paradise 
into  which  nature  first  placed  nfuu  has  never  been  los 
furthest,  only  a  few  inconveniencing  thorns  and  thistles  have 
en.'p!  in,  which,  however,  are  ca>ily  rooted  out.     Man  i.-^  no! 
to  help  to  shape  the  course  of  world-history,  but  simply  t-> 
on  with  it,  to  work  as  a  passive  wheel   in  the  eternal  cl 
work.     The  high'-  t  symbol  of  morality  i;  the  natural  sky  with 
its  eternally  uniform  movement.     As  the  actual  world  is  the 
mutual  intet  ion  of  the  two  primitive  principles,  heaven 

and  earth,  and    holds  the  equilibrium  between  them,  . 
morality  the  preservation  of  equipoise— the   middle  waj    is 
always  the  best.     Morality  is,  therefore,  not  exacting,  ain 
nothing  high,  but  is  mild,  temperate,  and  practical.    Man  i 


1869.]  Wutthe  on  J V-  -J '/,  \  ton  ic  Eth  tcs.  511 

not  to  deny  himself,  to  counteract  his  heart,  but  only  in  all 
things  to  be  moderate.  Man,  that  K  ^he  Chinaman,  is  natu- 
rally able  to  fulfil]  all  morality;  and  there  have  been,  there- 
fore, absolutely  sinless  men.  Virtue  is  easy,  as  it  meetshostile 
evil  neither  in  the  heart  nor  in  society,  and  as  it  c.v 
every-where,  not  bale,  but  love  and  esteem. 

As  morality  is  the  mere  expression   of    natural   order,   Xl 
stands  in  relation  to  the  course  of  nature.     Keeping  the  i 
mean  preserves  the  equipoi  eof  nature  ;  and  every  disturl  . 
of  the  same  by  sin  re-echoes  through  the  whole— especially 
when  the  sinner  is  the  vicar  of  Heaven,  the  emperor,  who  is 
called  by  office  to  be  a  pattern,  a  moral  ideal.     Drouth,  famine, 
overflows,  pestilence,  are  not  so  much  penalties  inflicted  bv  a 
personal  god  as  the  immediate  natural   consequences  of  th< 
sins  of   the  emperor,  and   of  the  people  in    imitating  him. 
Instead  of  an  historical  connection,  a  working  of  sin  oncoming- 
generations,  we  have  here  a  natural  connection,  a  working 
it  on  present  nature  and  on  the  present  generation.     Ace 
ing  to  this  conception,  man's  sins  have  not  only  to  do  with 
himself,  they  react  also  disturbingly  on  the  universe,  and  on 
its  highest  manifestation,  the  Celestial  Empire;  all  sins  are, 
therefore,  crimes,  and  hurtful  to  large. 

The  center  of  moral  life  is  the  family;  in  it  is  revealed  the 
divine  life,  consisting  in  the  antagonism  of  the  male,  or  active, 
and  the  female,  or  passive,  (spiril  aud  matter,)and  in  the  union 
of  the  two.  Family  life  is  a  living  divine  service,  and  family 
duties  the  highest.  Filial  obedience  yields  to  no  other.  What 
heaven  is  to  earth,  thai  is  the  father  to  his  children,  and  i 
ence  to  parents  is  a  religion-  virtue.  Marriage  is,  therefoi 
moral  duty  which  the  virtuous  cannot  ne<  lect.  The  celibate 
breaks  the  succession  of  the  family  and  on  his 

But  a  fully  realized   morality  appears  only  in   the  ' 
which  i-  simply  the  pcrfecte  i  family.      The  emperor,  as  son 
and  vicar  of  Heaven,  and   a-   ruling,  not  arbitrarily  bu 
:1  laws,  is  the  fath  ir  and  educatoj;of  the  people, not  i 
protecting  right,  bnl   also,  as    pattern   of  virtue, 

:is  people.     Ju  China  :! 
ind  every  thine;  is  the  State.     Between  civil  and 
moral  law  there  is  no  disl  inction. 

III.  The  Indians,  both  Brahmins  and  Bui  ally 


512  Wiitike  on  Pre  -Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

with    their   extreme   pantheism,  conceive  of  morality  in   an 
essentially  negative  foqm.     Human  personality  is  delusive  and 
unjustifiable,  and,  therefore,  the  essence  of  morality  i 
denial,  world-renunciation,  passive  suffering.     The  moral  goal 
is  not  a  personal  possession,  not  a  realization  of,  am1  - 
tiou  to,   a  moral   kingdom  of  persons,  but  the   giving  up  of 
personality.     All  finite  reality  is  evil,  not  by  man's  fault  butin 
itself;  needs    nut    redemption    but    annihilation:    but    pure 
pantheistic  Brahminism  derives  the  world  and  humanity  from 
the  divine  substance,  and,  therefore,  admits   a  substratum  of 
divinity   in  exevy  thing.     Buddhism    annihilates   even   deity 
itself,  and.  mates  morality  to  consist  in   a  patient,  hop 
contemplation  of  the  nullity  of  all  things. 

But  to  particularize.  The  Brahmins  have,  in  their  sacred 
books,  ancient  and  rich  collection-;  of  ethical  teaching-.  Of 
divine  origin,  and  almost  equally  esteemed  with  the  Vedas,  are 
the  Laws  of  Mann,  of  which  portions  belong  to  differenl  i 
though  the  most  recent  are  anterior  to  the  fourth  century  J !.  0. 
Moral  maxims  are  yet  unseparated  from  religious  and  civil. 

The  Brahmin  regards  the  real  world  as  neither  necessary  nor 
justifiable,  but  as  a  sort  of  dreamlike  emanation  from  Brahm, 
which  after  a  temporary  and   purposeless    continuance    will 
vanish  back  into  the  bosom  of  the  All.     Personality  is  an  evil. 
Continued  existence  in  soul-transmigration  i.-  punishment,  not 
reward.     All  reality  is,  as  individuality,  evil,  and  only  i 
general  divine  basis,  good.     The  moral  subject  is  not  man 
se;  there  is  no  human  individuality,  but  only  closer  or  rei 
circles  mound  the  divine  center-classes  (castes)  of  men,  < 
different  by  nature,  mid  of  which  the  lower  are  inferior  to  many 
beasts,  and  utterly  incapable  of  morality.     To  teach  the  A>  i 
or  the  Laws  to  >\u;}\,  is  the  greatest  crime.    Only  for  the 
higher  castes  is  true  knowledge  and  morality  possible.     Even 
among  them  are  moral  capacity  mid  duty  \  it.    An  In- 

dian speaks  of  the  duties,  not  of  men,  bul  limins 

alone  are  capable  of  the  highest  morality,  and  morality  ' 
a  positive  shaping  and  developing  of  reality,  but  a  contemptuous 
tumii  d  :'"!1!  the  .-ame  in  order  to  verge  personality 

the  impersonal  All.     The  highest  virtue  i-  renunci 
merely  of  sensual  pleasure,  of  earthly  comfort,  but  of  personal 
consciousness,   in  order  that  Brahm  alone  may   exist.      The 


1869.]  WuttkeonPre-PlaionicB/tics.  513 

highest  good  is  to  become  one  with  Brahm,  not  in  moral  like- 
ness, but  as  a  drop  loses  itself  in  the  ocean.  As  in  deepest 
sleep  man  is  nearer  deity  than  when  awake,  so   the  goal  of 

virtue  is  the  eternal  sleeping  of  the  personal  soul,  the  evapo- 
ration of  the  drew-drop  that  trembles  on  {lie  loins  leaf.  Hold- 
ing fast  to  personality  is  the  root  of  all  evil.  Naught  should 
exist  but  God.  for  whom,  indeed, the  existence  of  the  world  is 
at  best  but  a  dream -phantom,  a  transient  hallucination. 

The  Brahmin  looks  sadly  at  the  present,  with  indifference 
into  the  future,  and  with  contentment  only  on  the  past,  when 
naught  was  but.  Brahm,  and  into  that  future  which  Will  again 
realize  this  past.  A  Brahmin's  morality  is  less  a  working  than 
a  sacrificing,  and  is  identical  with  his  worship,  vi'  which  the 
essence  is  simply  self-torture.  What  nature  doe-  for  her  prod- 
ucts by  decomposition  man  must  do  for  himself  by  morality. 
The  fearful  self-tortures  of  the  Indian  arc  not  penance  for 
sins,  but  highest  acts  of  sanctity.  He  has  no  consciousness  of 
guilt;  the  evil  that  exists  is  not  his, but  Clod's.  The  evil  that 
is  associated  with  all  finite  reality  i;  inherent  in  the  same,  and 
has  no  remedy  but  its  sinking  back  into  the  infinite.  All 
morality  is  mere  self-denial  ;  the  true  sage  needs  not  only  do 
no  positive  works,  he  avoids  them  from  principle, for  they  be- 
long only  to  the  realm  of  vanity. 

For  man  even,  a.s  an  object  of  moral  action,  has  the  Indian 
no  concern;  he  has  a  higher  love  for  nature,  as  this  stands 
nearer  the  deity.  In  nature  he  sees  his  mother,  and  lovingly 
reverences  her  as  the  most  immediate  revelation  of  Brahm. 
The  same  Brahmin  who  can  coldly  see  apariah  famish,  with- 
out even  reaching  out  his  hand  to  help,  shudders  at  the  thought 
of  breaking  a  grass-blade  or  swallowing  a  gnat,  and  will  not, 
without  cause,  break  the  least  earth-clod.  Marriage  and  the 
family  life  in  general  can  be  only  a  transition  stage  for  the 
in..: ally  imperfect.  The  enlightened  Brahmin  musl  forsake 
father  and  mother,  wife  and  child;  musl  die  to  the  worl  I 
to  himself ;  and  live  only  in  solitary  contemplation  of  Brahm, 
standing  for  years  on  the  same  spol  ■ 
seeking  or  accepting  only  the  ! 

finite  must  become  utterly  indifferent,  until,  fading  awa\ 
a  plant,  lie  attains  the  longed-for  death.      For  socii  !y  and 
politics  those  o(  the  lowei   i  y  have  c  mcern.     Brah- 


511-  Wutike  on  Pre  -Platonic  Ethics.         [October, 

mins  care  naught  for  these  things,  and  higher  than  the  warrior- 
hero  or  the  dominating  prince  is  the  crown-despising  hermit. 

Stronger  still  is  the  ethical  consciousness  of  the  Buddhists, 
whose  wide-prevailing  religion — an  offshoot  of  the  Brahminic, 
and  founded  in  the  sixth  century  13.  C.  by  the  Indian  prince 
Sakya-Muni — is  the  only  heathen  one  that  over  sent  out  for- 
eign mission-.  Within  a  few  centuriesit  spread  itself  through 
all  middle,  southern  and  eastern  Asia  as  far  as  into  Japan.  The 
sacred  books  of  the  Buddhists  are  chiefly  of  moral  contenl 
their  religion  itself  is,  in  the  main,  morality. 

Going-  a  step  beyond  the  unconditioned  Brahm  of  the  Brah- 
mins, the  Buddhist  regards  this  undetermined  baseofall  tl 
as  nonentity  itself — Nirvana.     All  being  sprang  from  nonen- 
tity, therefore  every  thing  is  in  essence  nonentity,  and  in  an- 
nihilation finds  iis  true  goal.     Such  only  is  the  goal  of  man 
and    of    all    moral    aspiration.     All    is  vanity  in    heaven    and 
earth — heaven  and  earth  themselves  are  vain;  and  over  ;!;  • 
vanishing  ruins  of  a  falling  universe   sits  eternally  enthroned 
the  infinite  void.     The   morality  of  this  atheistical  religion  is 
in  striking  contrast  to  the  lustful  pleasure-seeking  atheism  of 
modern  times,  and  consists  in  this,  that  the  Buddhist  is  truly  in 
earnest  with  his  comfortless  dogma  ;  that  he  presents  the  God- 
forsaken world  to  himself  as  really  such,  denies  himself  all  en- 
joyment of  the  same,  and  considers  deep  grief  at  the  emptiness 
of  all  being  as  the  height  of  human  virtue.     Unable  to  conceive! 
of  a  personal  God,  he  rejects  an  impersonal  one  as  worse  than 
none.     His   religion   in  its  pure  form   is  a  religion  of  di    pair; 
and  with  it  his  ethics  correspond,  differing  entirely  from 
Brahminic.     Here,  there   is   no  divine  center  of  the  unr 
around  which  privileged  classes  are  grouped,  humanity  j 
simply  a   vast    sea  of  uniform  sand-grains.     Here,  no  divine 
fatality  controls  human  action;  but  moral  activity  aims  ■.: 
positive  goal,  only  al  annihilation.     The  Bnddhi  not, 

but  onlysuffei  .  The  world's  history  is  one  vast  tragedy.  The 
height  of  wisdom  is  deeply  to  feel  and  to  compassioi  rrible 

catastrophe.  Suffering  and  sympathy  are  the  sole  sentiments 
of  the  sage;  his  nu  in  aspiration  i9  I  at  of  this  life  of 

woe.  In  n  world  without  God  he  is  horaelcs  ,  restless,  com- 
fortless, without  future,  without  joyful  present.  His  world- 
renunciation  is  less  active,  virile,  self-torturing  than  that  of  the 


1869.]  WuttJcem  Pre -Platonic  Ethics.  515 

Brahmin,  but,  as  it  were,  passive,  feminine,  quietly  suffi  i 
submissively  waiting,  till  existence  falls  away  of  itself.  Man 
must  ck-spise  the  world,  not  in  hope  of  a  better,  but  because 
misery  is  inseparable  from  it.  The  pious  should  live  as  a  home- 
less wanderer,  or  as  a  hermit  in  forest  or  desert,  in  beggar  garb, 
possessing  notliing,  solitary,  indifferenl  to  pain  or  pleasure, 
dead  to  all  emotions.  Wedlock,  as  producing  new  existi  . 
and,  therefore,  in  itself  evil,  he  must  absolutely  avoid.  Such 
self-denial  the  older,  purer  Buddhism  required  of  all  men,  and 
it  is  only  a  deteriorated  form  of  later  times  that  conceded  to 
a  portion  of  the  population  a  less  rigid  severity. 

Buddhist  ethics  is  mainly  negative.  "  Thou  shall  not,"  is  the 
prevailing  form  of  command.  An  important  precept  is,  to 
avoid  increasing  the  unhappiness  of  either  man  or  beast. 
Hence  is  here  found,  hand  in  hand  with  the  highest  contempt 
of  the  world,  the  greatest  gentleness  toward  all  living  creatures. 
Nothing  may  be  hurt,  nothing  hilled.  To  alleviate,  the  pain 
of  another,  man  should  even  take  it  upon  himself.  And  a 
historical  fact,  the  Buddhists  have  been  the  gentlest  of  all 
heathens.  But  this  gentleness  .is  not  so  much  active  love  as 
mere  compassion. 

TY.  The  moral  consciousness  o(  the  Egyptians  and  of  the 
Semitic  nations,  especially  the  Assyrians  and  Babylonians, 
as  yet,  very  imperfectly  known.  Thus  much  seems  certain, 
that  amonf  these  nations,  which  form  a  sort  of  link  between 
the  Pantheists  of  cast  Ana  and  the  Theists  of  west  Europe, 
the  moral  destiny  of  man  and  the  personality  of  God  came  {» 
a  partially  correct  recognition. 

But  more  in  detail.     Egypt  stood  on  the  dividing  line  be- 
tween the  naturalistic  and  the  p<  rsonally-spiritual-world  theory. 
True,   the  divine    is,  at   base,  only    a  nature-force;   it 
gles   up,  however,  into  spiritual    personality.     The  presuppo- 
sition of  morality  is  an  inner  moral-world-antagonism.     1 
personal  good  divinities  an'  opposed  by  evil    in  the  form   of  a 
bein""  who,  though  less  spiritual,  is  likewise  divine  and  mi 
Man  in  his  moral  life  is  invulved  in  tie  mi,  and  is 

call  d  to  deterinin  •  him    >lf  fi     I  ■  the  evil. 

Mains  self-determining  power  ;  i  i  icivcd  under  a  higher 
form  than  in  China  or  India.  Here,  therefore,  more  war- 
like historical   characters   have  been  produced.     The  goal  of 


510  Wuttke  on  Pre  -Platonic  Ethics.         [Oct 

life  is  the  victory  of  the  good  over  the  evil  by  the  per 
spirit. 

It  was  among  the  Egyptians  that  the  personality  of  the 
came  first  to  full  recognition.  Spirit  is  other  and  higher  than 
nature,  and  is  called  to  victory  over  it,  to  moral  self-determi- 
nation, and  to  personal  immortality.  -But  this  calling  to  vic- 
tory over  nature  does  not  realize  itself  in  the  earthly  life.  As 
Osiris  succumbs  to  the  evil  Typhon,  so  must  man  finally  suc- 
cumb to  unspiritual  nature — only,  however,  to  come  to  the 
enjoyment  of  full  spirituality  in  the  future  slate.  The  morn- 
ing of  spiritual  freedom  has  dawned  in  .Egypt,  but  it  is  not  yet 
day.  Only  through  struggle,  suffering,  and  dying  is  the 
made  free  both  in  the  world  of  gods  and  of  men.  Osiris  be- 
comes a  real  ruler  only  in  the  lower  world  ;  so,  also,  man  a  real 
num.  Only  out  of  death  springs  life  and  victory.  The 
moral  life  of  the  Egyptian,  though  brighter  than  thai 
the  Indian,  is  still  overspread  with  a  dusky  vail,  a  melancholy 
breath.  Though  eventuating  in  fruition,  it  is  here  full  of  sor- 
rows. Though  not  yet  free,  he  becomes  so  after  death,  it'  he 
here  bravely  battles;  and  he  is  conscious  of  full  r  isponsibility 
for  his  state  after  death.  His  lot  is  not  assigned  b; 
by  him  who  firs.t  vanquished  nature  and  death ;  by  ( >siris,  who  is 
king  of  the  next  world,  in  which  true  life  first  begins,  and  who 
judges  all  human  conduct  by  the  scale  of  righteousness.  With 
Osiris  the  just  live  on  in  communion  and  bliss.  Osiris,  wl 
the  highest  representative  of  the  spiritual  godhead,  the  pattern 
and  earnest  of  immortalit}T,  the  first-born  of  those  who  live 
alter  death,  is  also  the  highest  representative  of  Egyptian  mo- 
rality, the  chief  trait  of  which  is  persistent  battling  for  right- 
eousness. 

But  perfect  righteousness  is  attained  only  in  the  next  w< 
on  earth  the  evil  powers  have  irresistible  sway.  Thei 
the  Egyptians,  C  mtrary  to  the  Chine  e,  direct  all  their  low 
concern  to  the  future  life.     Tin  of  their  living  v. etc 

ly  paltry  huts,  whereas  those  of  their  dead  were  monu- 
ments of  the  highest  int.  and  of  an  unparalleli 
zeal.     The  i  il  :  >  and  the  royal  tombs,  the  p;  num- 

ber among  the   wonders  of  the   ancient  world,   and  def 
ravages  of  time.     The  present   lite  is,  as  in  India,  lightly  es- 
teemed;  not,  however,  because  of  the  vanity  of  all  being,  but 


1 869.]  Wuttke  on  Pre  -Platan  ic  Ethics.  5 1 7 

as  compared  with  :ui  immeasurably  higher,  richer  future  life. 
Mementoes  of  death  attended  the  Egyptians  cvery-wherc,  aim 
mummies  or  images  of  the  deceased  served  as  such  even  at 
their  banquets.  "The  Egyptians,"  says  Diodorus,  "esteem  the 
time  of  this  life  as  very  unimportant;  they  call  the  dwellings 
of  the  living,  inns;  but  the  graves,  eternal  dwellings." 

The  heathen  Semitic  nations,  especially  the 
Babylonians,  base  religion  and  morality  on  the  ground  of  the 
subjective  mind,  the  isolated  personality.  The  vague  nni 
naturalism  they  have  abandoned,  but  the}  have  not  yet  attained 
that  of  the  infinite  Spirit.  Spirit  appeal's  only  in  the  multi- 
plicity of  individuals.  In  religion,  as  in  morality,  is  there 
manifested,  for  the  first  time,  the  independency  of  bold,  rude, 
subjective  spirit  on  any  absolute  objective  power,  whether  nat- 
ural or  spiritual;  an  arbitrariness  of  individual  volition, daring 
deeds,  sustained  savageness  of  will  and  passion,  powerful  move- 
ment without  end  or  purpose.  Man  as  individual  steps  for- 
ward as  highest  authority.  Morality  lacks  a  firm  basis  and 
norm.  Jr.  is  the  era  of  the  great  heroes,  tyrants,  and  God-dc- 
spisers;  from  Nimrod,  who  began  to  be  a  mighty  hunter  before 
the  Lord,  to  Nebuchadnezzar,  who  openly  revolted  against  him. 
A  rude,  egotistical,  moral  consciousness  is  stamped  with  the 
defiance  of  the  haughty  subject  toward  all  objective  or  divine 
authority.  Cruelty  and  sensuality  characterized  even  the 
worship — much  more  the  moral  life.  Nineveh  and  Babylon 
reached  the  highest  foi  m  of  godless,  pleasure-seeking,  luxurious 
life  in  the  pre-Christian  world. 

V.  To  a  higher  stand-point  than  the  earlier  nations,  though 
not  to  a  higher  development  of  it.  rose  the  temporarily  world- 
historical  Persians.  The  sharp  moral  antagonism  of  the  two 
divine  principles  call-  here  to  earnesl  combal  ;■ 
born  evil.  Moral  personality  is  more  highly  esteemed.  The 
moral  calling  is  more  earnest,  and  has  the  a  surance  of  victory 
over  evil  not  merely  in  the  next  world,  but  within  the  sphere 
of  history  itself.  Morality  has  here,  for  the  first  time  in 
thendom,  a  positive  historical  realization  ol  a  king- 

dom of  good    on   earth.     The  Persiaus  arc  the  solo  heathen 
nation  which  has,  for  the  basis  of  it-    moral   aspirati 
nite  prophecy.    'The   essence   of  Pci  ian   morality  is  a  hope- 
buoyed,  conscious  combat  against  mighty  evil,  which  is  \ 

Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — u'o 


518  Wuitkeon  Pre -Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

not  as  a  natural,  but  as  a  moral  and  thoroughly  abnormal  cor- 
ruption. It  looks  to  a  purification  of  man  from  evil  through 
volitional  resistance  to  an  evil  deity. 

But  more  explicitly.     The  Persians  were   not  able,   in  the 
brief  period  of  their  historical  glory,  from  Cyrus  to  Alexander, 
to  develop  their  ethical  consciousness  to  a  ripe  sci<  ntific  form. 
Our  chief  source  of  information,  the  A  vesta,  is  far  inferior  to 
theprofound   sacred  books  of  the  Indians,  though  the  moral 
stand-point  is  higher.     The  real  world   is   no  longer  a  divine 
substance,  but  a  product  of  creative  act.     Gu<}   is  higher  than, 
and  rules  over,  nature,  though  not  as  a  perfectly  free  omnipo- 
tent Creator.     The  material  world  is  not  hostile,  but  friendly, 
to  virtue.     Man  begins  to  feel  at  home  in  it,  and  regards  his 
highest  good  as  here  realizable.     His  goal,  moreover,  is  attained, 
not  by  natural  development,  but  by  constant,  earnest  bat! 
against  positively  existing  evil.    This  evil  inheres  net  in  nature, 
but  was  guiltily  caused  by  the  fall   of  a   divinity  from  good. 
This  view  approaches   nearer  Christianity  than    any  we  I     ■ 
thus  far  met.     The  Chinese, in  ignoring  evil,  and  the  Indians, 
in  regarding  it  a--  a  necessity  of  finite  reality,  deprive  morality 
of  its   highest  motive.     With   the  Persians,  all  evil  com 
personal  act,  though  not  human  but  pre-historical  and  divine. 
The  godhead  pt  /:  •-• ,  however,  cannot  do  evil ;  but  there  is 
other   equally  personal   god,  who,    having   freely  chosen   evil, 
interpenetrates  the  good  world  with   his  own,   is  concerned  in 
all  actual  evil,  and  is  therefore   called  Angra-Mainyus,  (Ahri- 
man,)  the  " evil-disposed,"    the  originator  of  death,    Jab. 
impurity,  and  all  hurtful  creatures. 

Though  casting  the  guilt  of  evil  from  himself  back  on  the 
god- world,  still  the  Persi an  conceives  his  own  moral  d 
and  duty  in  regard  to  actual  evil  much  more  clearly  than  th  • 
earlier  nations.  Man  stands  with  full  freedom  betw 
and  evil,  and  ha-,  a-  moral  calling,  to  come  into  constantly 
do  er  communion  with  the  good  Being,  and  into  ever  greater 
antagonism  t<>  the  Spiritof  Evil.     Morali  .  and  is 

based  on  the  definitely-revealed  will  of  Ormuzd.  Tim-  mo- 
rality is  no  longer  naturalistic,  but  purely  spiritual;  and  the 
subjective  arbitrariness  of  the  S 

an  objective  moral  norm  is  attained.  The  revealed  holy  Word 
is  the  mightiest  weapon  against  Ahriman.     The  moral  Btrn 


1869.]  Wuttke  on  Prc-Plaionic  .Ethics.  519 

is  here  more  earnest  than  in  Egypt,  for  it  is  buoyed  up  by  hope 
of  victory  in  tliis  world.  Osiris  has  been  virtually  banished 
from  this  world  into  the  future,  but  Ormuzd  maintains  against 
evil,  even  here,  a  hopeful  contest.    The  Persian,  holding  himself 

for  a  champion  of  God.  has  in  his  moral  strife  a  high 
to  defend  God  and  his  work ;  a  high  goal,  redemption  of  the 
world  from  evil:  and  a  high  hope,  for  Sosiosch,  the  Helper, 
will  finally  come  to  perfect  the  victory.  It  is  not  without 
reason  that  the  Persians,  who  were  hostile  to  foreign  religions, 
especially  to  the  grossly  idolatrous,  showed  constantly  ■■:.  high 
esteem  for  the  Jews,  for  in  their  higher  God-idea  they  found  a 
similarity  to  their  own. 

The  morality  of  the  Persians  is,  in  harmony  with  their  the- 
ology, mainly  of  a  denying  character,  directing  itself  destruc- 
tively against  the  manifestations  of  the  evil  Ahriman.  Purifi- 
cation from  whatever  emus  in  real  or  symbolical  contact  "with 
evil,  death,  or  corruption,  the  killing  of  poisonous  or  hurtful 
animals,  and  the  like,  are  not  only  moral  duties,  but  also  acts 
of  worship,  and  the  Avesta  abounds  in  minute  directions  on 
such  points. 

But  also  the  positive  morality  of  the  Persians  is  much  hi 
than  with  earlier  nations.  Persians  stood,  in  the  eyes  of  their 
contemporaries,  in  favorable  moral  contrast  to  the  luxuriou 
of  the  Semitic  nations.  They  were  sympathetic  and  active. 
Indolence  i-:  from  Ahriman  ;  labor,  especially  laud  culture,  ma- 
terial amelioration,  etc.,  are  holy  requirements  of  Ormuzd. 
The  moral  bearing  of  man  to  his  fellow  is  delicate  and  noble. 
High  respect  for  personality  is  tin;  basis  of  social  virtue. 
Honesty,  truthfulness,  and  high  personal  honor  distinguishes 
Persian  morality  very  widely  from  the  ea 

Only  whore  evil  is  viewed  no  longer  as  a  mere  abstract  inci- 
dent of  reality,  but  a-  a  concrete,  guilty,  personal  actuality, 
moral  resistance  against  the  same  become  really  earnest.     The 
Chinese,  labora  quietly,  busily,  mechanically;  the  Indian  pa- 
tiently endures ;  the  Egyptian  mourn.-:  and  longs  lor  the  next 
world;  the  Shemite  pranc<  sand  enjoys;  but  the  Pereian  battles 
in  manly,  moral  earnest.     The  chief  error  in  his  moral 
sciousness  is,  that  ho  assigns  evil  to  the  god-sphere,  and  iloes 
not  recognize  it  in  his  own  heart. 
The  ethical  coiii  ■  of  the  Greeks  isverydiff 


520  Wuttke  on  Prc-Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

that  of  the  Persians.     Though  developing  itself  more  wideiy 
than  tliis,  it  seems  to  approach  less  nearly  the  stand-point  of 
Christianity.     The  heathen  mind  could  not  !  n    h  ild  fast  to 
the  Persian  dualism  ;  the  Greeks  seek  the  reconciliation  of  the 
world-antagonism  by  placing  it  in  the  past,  and  regard   the 
present  as  an  unbroken    continuance   of  the  world-ham 
which  was  obtained  at  the  outset  of  human  history  by  the  vic- 
tory of  the  personal  Spirit  over  hostile  nature-forces.     The 
dualism  of  hostile  antagonism  is  lost  in  a  dualism  of  love.     No 
evil  god  and  no  unspiritual  nature-power  oppo  es  the  ethical 
activity.     Morality  is  not  contest,  but  normal  development  of 
the  essentially  good  and  pure  human  being.     Man,  by  follow- 
ing liis  naturally  harmonious  disposition,  by  enjoying  the  beau- 
tiful actuality  of  the  world,  by  ennobling  sensuous  enjoyment 
through  spiritual  culture,  and  by  unfolding  equally  all  pli 
of  his  sensuous  and  spiritual  life,  attains  to  the  harmonious 
perfection  of  his  personality,  the  highest  goal  of  ethical  aspira- 
tion.    The  beautiful  is,^w  se,  the  good.     In  enjoying  and  cre- 
ating the  beautiful  is  man  moral.     The  battle  is  not  to  destroy 
a  world  of  evil,  nor  to  realize  an  ethical  ideal,  but  simply  to 
develop  the  full  heroic  personality.     The  Greek  battles  for  the 
sake  of  battling— finds  in  battle  enjoyment,  heroic  sport.     The 
Greek  ideal  is  the  vigorous,  youthful  personality  ;  in  the  go  l- 
world,  the  young  Apollo;  in  the  hero  world,  Achilles;  until, 
at  the  close  of  Grecian  ascendency,  Alexander  realized  it  in 
an  historical  form.     But  all  ideality  inheres  in  the  transcend- 
ent individual.     An  enduring  world-historical,  ethical  reality, 
however,  the  Greeks  could  nol   create.     The  positively  perfect 
goal  was  lacking.     Alexander's  conqnering  deed-'  looked  to- 
ward, and  could  only  glorify,  his  own  heroic,  person;  had  t 
away  at  his  death;  and  the  Greeks  became  an  easy  pre) 
nation  which,  with  zealous  persistence,  aimed;  at  the  positive 
^oal  of  a  unified  world,  and  held  the  individual  in  absolute 
subordination  to  their  purpose.     To  the',     kl      ethical  ides 
is  move  an  object  of  e  ,iheti<  al  i  i  ']■  i)  menl  than  of  moral  realiza- 
tion.    For  the  :  '   ber  moral  life,  the  family, 
is  his  ethical  conpciousness  extremely  defective ;  am 
humanity  per  se}  he  doi  -   r  :  only  the  Hellene,  no1 
the  barbarian,  is  held  for  a  truly  moral  personality.     Slavery 
is  the  indispensable  basis  of  a  free  State. 


1869. J  Wutthe  on  Pre  -PUton  ic  Ethics.  52 1 

But  to  take  a  closer  view.  The  earlier  world-antagonism,  of 
which  all  heathen  nations  have  been  conscious,  though  not 
perfectly  overcome  by  the  Greeks,  is  yd  resolved  into  a  sort  of 
harmony,  which,  however,  as  viewed  from  a  Christian  stand- 
point, must  he  regarded  as  delusive.  The  consciousness  of 
such  an  antagonism   ;  .  d  in  myths  concerning  ancient 

struggles  between  spiritual  deities  and  Titanic  nai 
The  former  remain  victors,  and  the  actual  world  manifests  the 
reconciliation  of  the  antagonism.  Every-wherc,  in  heaven  and 
earth,  are  nature  and  spirit  in  harmonious  union.  All  p 
hostile  to  personal  mind  was  already  conquered  in  the  pre- 
historic period,  and  the  Titans  arc  thrust  into  Tartarus.  The 
basis  of  Grecian  morality  is,  therefore,  delight  in  actual  exist- 
ence—love as  bliss.  Man  is  not  to  sacrifice  his  desires,  but 
only  to  heighten  and  indulge  them  so  far  as  they  bear  the 
stamp  of  harmony  and,  beauty,  lie  is  not,  as  the  Indian,  to 
renounce  the  world,  but  to  enjoy  its  inexhaustible  beauty  in 
peaceful  satisfaction  ;  nor  as  the  Persian,  to  combat  its  evil- 
permeated  actuality;  but  to  pluck  its  joy-bringing  fruits. 
Grecian  morality  is  that  of  one  who,  without  severe  inner 
struggle,  is  complacently  satisfied. 

The  Hellene  has,  on  the  one  hand,  in  his  conviction  of 
world-harmony  a  strong  motive  to  virtue.  Glad  to  preserve 
this  harmony,  he  is  in  general  kind,  open,  honorable,  and 
shows  respect  for  the  moral  personality  of,  as  well  as  some  de- 
gree of  generosity  to,  his  enemies;  but  he  has  in  it,  on 
other  hand,  a  tendency  to  superficial  morality — believing  that 
without  any  contest  he  possesses  the  good  already,  and  that  his 
natural  desires  are  right,  lie  i..  inclined  to  indulge  hint 
even  in  excessive  lusts  if  they  only  wear  tlj  .    au- 

tiful.  The  Inauty  of  the  manner  excuses  the  sin.  The  wor- 
ship of  Aphrodite  gives  to  sensuality  even  a  religiou  counte- 
nance.     Grecian  eliemiuacy  and  luxuriousness,  to  which  the 

ans  alone  were  an   exception,  became  proverbial   a: 
the  Romans.     Also  for  the  darker  passions,  hate  and  revi 
the  Creek  had  little  blame;  lie  took  no  offense  at  the  borrid 
abuse  of  the  heroic  [lector.     The  mosl  virtuous  were  nol   i 
spected,  but  banished  ;.  the  flatterers  wen-  honored,  the  frii 
of  truth  h;iied  or  killed. 
Exquisite  taste  for  the  beautiful  elevate-  the  Greek  to  a  I 


522  Wuttkeon  Pre-Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

conception  of  moral  beauty,  and  the  poets  sketch  moral  i 
with  masterly  hand  ;    but  their  ideals  are  more  for  esthetic 
contemplation    than    moral    imitation.       Morality    bec< 
therefore,  a  mere  spectacle;  and  in  no  heathen  nation  is  the 
contrast  between  the  ideal  and  real  life  so  great  as  in  that 
which  conceived  the  ideal  the  highest.     The  moral  require- 
ments  of  practical  life  were  different  from  tl 
The  same  people  v.  ho  on  the  stage  admired,  and  in  song-  heard, 
with  rapture,  such  female  ideals  as  Penelope,  Antigone,  and 
Electra,  placed   in   actual,  life  woman,  marriage,  and  general 
domestic  life  much  lower  than   the  Chinese  and  the  ancient 
Germans;  and  even  accomplished  concubines  enjoyed,  not  • 
in  the  condemned  taste  of  the  more  corrupt  circles,  but  also  in 
the  moral  judgment  of  the  most  cultivated,  (especially  after 
the  time  of  the  notorious  Aspasia,  who  is  associated  in  history 
with  Pericles,  and  was  also  honored  by  Socrates.)  higher  regard 
than  simple  housewives,  and  became  the  real  guides  of  female 
culture  and  the  ideals  of  female  grace.      In  Sparta  the  family 
was  destroyed  by  express  legislation,  and  the  penal  laws  against 
bachelors,  which  soon  became  necessary,  are  but  a  proof  of  how 
popular  those  laws  hostile  to  domestic  life  really  were.     Solon 
found  it  necessary  to  the  well-being  of  the  State  to  prot 
with  penal  sanction-,  the  simplest  natural  duties  of  the  marriage 
state — a  proof  of  how  great  already,  in  his  day,  was  the  general 
aversion  to  wedlock— a  state  which,  though  forming  the  basic 
true  morality,  was  regarded  in  the  brightest  age  of  Greece 
as  little  better  than  a  necessary  evil.     Abortion  and  the  ex- 
posing of  new-born  children  were  a  parental  right  which 
not  only  protected  by  laws,  but  also  justified  by  tb 
teemed  philosophers.     The  depravity,  nol  only  of  actual  life. 
but  also  of  the  general  moral  itself  mosl 

unambiguously  in  the  unnatural  lusts  which  even  philosophers 
stooped  to  gloss  up  int..  respectability.     Paul's  dark  picture 
(Rom.  i)  not   onh  of  Grecian  morals,  but  also  of  the  i 
consciousness  of  the  Greeks,  is  perfectly  confin  cd  by  \ 
history.     In  our  modern  i  improve  Chin  tii  n  pi  ' 

phy  by  '•  classic,"  these  fai  ts  ought  not  to  be  lefl  ont  of  sight. 
The  heathen   Germans  stand,  in  thi  "  the 

Greeks. 
Put  high  as,  indeed,  was  developed  the  idea  of  the  sacred 


1869.]  WuttJee  on  Pro-Platonic  Ethics.  523 

of  personality,  still  this  sentiment  was  indulged  only  for  the 
free  Hellenes,  who  formed  but  a  small  minority  of  the  Greek 
population.     (At  greatest  prosperity  Attica  contaiue  I 
slaves,  ami  Corinth  460,000.)     Barbarians  and  slaves  have  no 
right  to  personal  liberty.     Freedom  without  slavery  is  absurd. 
The  general  mild  treatment  of  slaves  was  more  an  expression 
of  natural  kindness  and  personal  interest  than  of  acki 
justice.     Spartan  slave-murdering  was  an  unquestioned   i 
of  State  and  citizen.     Even  Plato  and  Aristotle  are  unab 
imagine  a  ^vcq  State  without  the  personal  nnfrce  ivery. 

This  "humanitarian"  race  limits  freedom  to  tlie  possessors  of 
slave?.     And  the  higher  the  right  and  might  of  the  free  ri 
increases  their  power  over  their  slaves.     That  the  latter  were 
only  rational  domestic  animals  was  a  general  opinion,  and  ad- 
mitted by  the  sao 

Though  the  practical  opinions  and  actual  morals  of  the 
Greeks  are  in  some  respects  far  below  those  of  other  heathen 
nations,  vet  is  their  speculative  morality  higher.  Th:tt  which 
in  Christianity  forms  the  presupposition  of  all  truly  moral  life, 
the  reconciliation  (at-one-ment)  ol'  contradiction  and  antagonism 
in  tl  e  actual  world,  and  the  higher  right  and  power  of  personal 
spirit   over  unfree  nature,  is  by  the   Greeks  r  I   in  a 

higher  though  distorti  d  form  than  by  earlier  heathens.  A-  in 
Christianity  only  he  who.  through  an  historical  atonement,  is 
made  free  from  natural  sinfulness  and  raised" to  true  moral 
liberty  can  realize  true  morality,  so  also  the  Hellene  lays  at 
the  basis  of  his  ethics  a  prehistorical  reconciliation  of  nature 
and  spirit.  Of  course  he  could  come  to  such  a  conception  "t 
the  atonement  of  the  world-antagonism  only  by  ignoring  per- 
sonal guilt  for  it,  by  placing  its  reconciliation  in  the  pre-his 
toric  ao-es  among  I  Is,  and  by  regarding  man  as  now  en 

•jovini  this  world-harmony,  and  as  having  nothing  more 
with  the  ancient  antagonism,  bu I  csthctically  to  reproduce  it  in 
a;  i  and  poetry— in  mock  Titan  ball!.'-  on  Olympic  plains,  and 
in  Promethean  tragedies.  Still  flu-  basal  though!  in  this  is  im- 
portant: thai  onlj  man,  as  mad.'  free  and  placed  in  harmony 
with  the  universe,  is  capable  of  true  morality.  ■  sirry- 

\UJr   out   of  this    thoughl    i     very   defective;    that    tl       : 
through  his  fables  and  tragedies,  docs  not  rise  to  true  moral 
earnest  :   mere  result  of  his  heathen  surroundings.     And 


624  Wutikeon  Pre -Platonic  Ethics.  [Oc1 

even   in  the  fact  that  to  the  Hellene  morality  seems  so  i 
there  is  a  presentiment  of  the  true  thought,  tied  to  the  morally- 
emancipated  the  moral  law  appears  no  longer  us  a  yol 
den,  but  rather  as  the  immediate,  unconstrained,  bliss-inspi 
normal  life  of  the  sanctified  man.     To  no  other  heathen  ua 
is  morality  so  easy  a  task  as  to  the  Hellenes.     The  Greek 
recognizes  for  the  moral  subject  no  absolutely  binding 
law;  evers  the  moralizing  philosophers  confine  themselves,  in 
sharp  contrast  to  the  Chinese,  Indians,  and  Persians,  ah 
exclusively   to  the   mere  generalities,  seldom   giving  minute 
precepts.     Free  man  bears  the  law  in  himself,  and  !>•>- 
noi  is  external.     And  this  is  but  a  heathen  distort io 

theyAV  se  true  thought,  that  for  the  spiritually-regenerated  the 
law  of  God  is  written  in  the  heart  ;  that  his  yoke  is  easy  and 
his  burden  light.     If  Chinese  and  Persian  ethics  remind  us  of 
Jewish,  so  do  Grecian   of  Christian.     That  among  the  G 
the  resembling  phase  rested  vu  a  false  basis,  and  in  application 
wrought    pervertingly,  leading  to  frivolity,   and  in  i 
speets  to  a  lower  morality  than  that  of  the  Orientals,  proves  not 
the  perversity  of  the  theory,  but  the  perversity  of  the  natural 
man,  who  turns  the  truth  which  he  possesses  to  the  service  of 
sin,  and  thus  confirms  the  declaration  that  only  whom  th< 
makes   free  is  "free  indeed."     He  who  is  spiritually  entree 
while  imi  gining  himself  free,  is  in  greater  danger  than  he  who. 
being  unfn  e.  knows  himself  such.     The  Greek  is  more  respon- 
sible and  more  guilty  than  other  heathens,  I'rr  lie  has  a  hi 
knowledge,   and    the  Apostle's  condemnation  of  the  heathen 
(Rom.  i)  strikes  the  Greek  more  severely  than  others. 

VII.  It  was  through  Socrates  that  the  moral  consciousness 
of  the  Greeks  first  approached  a  philosophical  form.     J: 
him   we   find  little  but  isolated  practical  maxims.     Soci 
speculating  less  on  ontolog)  than  on  "  the  good,"  not  onty  bases 
the  ethical  on  philosophical  knowledge,  but  finds  tl 
essence  and  perfection.     Knowing  is  the  highest  virtue,  and 
out  of  it  flov  immediately  and  necessarily  all  others.     A  con- 
tradiction   between    knowing  and   willing    is    inconceivable. 
Ethics  realizes  itself  practically  in  the  subordination  of  irra- 
tional de  ires  to  rational  knowli  ■  ially  iu  obi 
civil  law.     Without  consciousness  of  the  might  of  evil  in  nat- 
ural man.  Socrates  finds  the  moral,  mainly,  i>\'.}\-  in  a  common- 


1869.]  Wutike  on  Pre  -Platonic  Ethics.  525 

sense  calculation  of  external  fitness.  His  significance  for  ethics 
lies  in  his  having  indicated  rational  knowledge  as  the  fountain 
of  the  ethical  and  objective,  though  imperfectly  defined,  good. 
as  the  goal  of  rational  life. 

More  definitely.  The  Greeks  speculated  very  early  concern 
ing  the  moral,  and  the  most  ancient  sages  were  chiefly  i 
ists;  but  it  was  long  before  the  isolated  practical  maxims  were 
reduced  to  systems.  Philosophy  proper  was  purely  specula- 
tive, and  the  moral  views  of  the  philosophers  were  but  loosely 
connected  with  their  systems. 

Socrates,  it  is  said,  flrsl   brought  philosophy  from  heaven  to 
the  earth.     With  him  it  becomes  essentially  mural.     Even  as 
to  God,  it  is  the  mural  rather  than  the  ontological  that  inti 
him.     To  know  the  good  is  for  him  the  essence  of  philos 
But  as  ethics  is  derived  exclusively  from  philosophy,  so  in  it 
the  element  of  knowledge  overbalances  that  of  emotion.    With 
Socrates  ethics  is  coldly  rational,  and  has  not,  as  in  I 
ity,  an  historical  basis,  but  is  a  priori  discoverable.     Man  is  by 
nature  totally  good,  and  has  in  his  freedom  a  decided  natural 
tendency  to  the  good,  as  in  his  reason  he  has  a  natural  thirst 
for  truth.     Evil  Oi<h.^  not  spring  from  a  Lad  will,  but  . 
from  error.     The  judgment  may  err,  and  the  consequent  act  is 
evil  ;  and  it  is  absolutely  impossible  that  man  should  not  wjll 
that  which  he  recognizes  as  good.     If,  therefore,  nan  are  only 
led  to  a  knowledge  of  the  good,  they  will  surely  act  virtuously. 
The  motive   to  morality  is  not   love,  but   knowledge.     To   in- 
struct is  to  render  better.     The  philosopher  is  the  virtuous — he 
only  can  practice  true  virtue.    The  ignorant  is  also  unmoral. 
"Know  thyself"  is  the  presupposition  of  all   morality  ;  not, 
however,  in  the  sense  of  knowing  the  evil  natun  itural 

heart,  but  in  the  sense  of  knowing  the  mind  in  its  logical  proc- 
esses.    In  his  dialogues  Socrates  docs  not  aim  t<>  shov  i 
their  moral  guilt,  bill  1"  convince  them  how  little  they  know. 
Ilis  ethics  is  a  one-sided  knowledge.     Thi 
one  virtue  of  wisdom,  tin  I  cr  virtues  1 

only  forms  of  this  one. 

The  chit  oing  of  wisdom  is   Bclf-mastery,  sub- 

ordination of  pn  Man  must 

in  all  cases  walk  by  the  light  of  knowledge  ■  self-con- 

sistency, and  not  yield  to  his  instincts.     Aud  as  know! 


520  Wuttke  on  Pre-Platonic  Ethics.  [October, 

cannot  be  stolen,  and  as  changes  of  feeling  arc  subordinate  to 
it,  so  has  man,  in  its  fixedness,  also  happiness  ;  the  sage  is  n<  c- 
essarily  happy  within  himself.  Herein  is  the  freedom  of  the 
wise.  Knowledge,  virtue,  and  happiness  are  essentially  but 
different  sides  of  the  same  thing.  In  thus  identifying  the 
good  with  knowledge  Socrates  rescues  it  from  the  arbitrari 
of  the  individual,  as  truth  is  objective,  and  not  in  his  control. 
The  good  is,  therefore,  independent  of  the  individual,  and  all 
rational  men  must  recognize  it.  The  ethical  idea  has,  there- 
fore, obtained  a  universal  positive  meaning,  and  ^ocrates  recog- 
nizes its  objective  validity  in  ascribing -true  wisdom  to  God 
alone. 

These  general  thoughts  of  Socrates  form  the  basis  of  the 
terns  that  follow  him.     He  does  not  develop  them.     When  he 
aims  to  give  them  a  mure  specific  meaning  it  is  by  advei 
to  civil  law,  in  obeying  which  man  becomes  moral.     His  mo- 
rality is,  therefore,  only  Greek  civic  virtue— -has  no  high      i  •  .1 
prototype.     Obedience  to  civil  law  is  the  sum  of  all  duties. 
"Just"  is  synonymous  with  "legal."     To  do  good  to  friends 
and  evil  to  enemies  is  a  moral  requirement,  though  it  is  better 
to  sutler  wrong  than  to  commit  it.     Injury  inflicted  on  em 
is  not  injustice,  but  righteous  retaliation. 

The  general  spirit  of  Socrates  is  a  dry,  prosaic  utilitarianism. 
His  moral  views,  except  as  developed  by  Plato,  lad:  ideal  in- 
spiration. In  his  own  life  he  rises  not  above  ordinary  Greek 
morality,  and  it  is  onlj  our  modem  deistical  charlatani  m  that 
could  have  placed  Socrates,  as  a  moral  ideal,  by  the  side  of 
Christ. 

In  Plato's  Symposia  n  Socrates  rivals  all  others  in  drinl 
and  outquaffs,  withoul  getting  intoxicated,  the  whole  company, 
and  vet  is  this  Platonic  Socrates  considerably  .     In 

Xenophon  Qlem.  iii.  11)  he  goes  with  a.  friend   t<>  a   public 
woman  and  teacli  's  her  the  art  of  fascinating  men.     The  i 
to  justify  this  is  by  no  means  si  If  in  such  a  i 

Socrates  thinks  of  nothing  better  than  indulging  in  logical 
gymn  istics  hi.,  moral  ji  dgmcnl  of  the  thing  i.-,  evident  enough. 
His  bearing  otherwi  e  to  Grecian  licentiousness  (Mem.  i,  3,  M, 
15)  manifests  deep  obscurity  of  moral  consciousness  even  in  the 
philosopher.     Of  moral  and  domestic  love  has  S  i  far 

as  we  know,  scarcely  ;i  dream.     When,  after  his  condemnation 


1809.]  Wutikeon  1J 're -Platonic  Ethic*.  527 

to  death,  his  wife  with  her  child  comes  to  his  prison  to  take 
leave  of  him,  Socrates  merely  remarks  dryly  to  his  friends, 
"Let  someone  take  the  woman  back  to  her  home."  She  is 
led  out  by  a  slave,  and  in  his  last  long  farewell  to  life  he  does 
not  find  place  for  a  single  word  for  wife  or  children. 

VIII.  From  Socrates  went  forth  several  schools  whose  dif- 
ferences were  mainly  ethical.  The  Cynics  (Antisthenes)  give, 
in  its  practical  application,  a  one-sided  prominence  to  the 
rates'  doctrine  of  the  ethical  significance  of  know!-  i 
Knowledge  creates  the  good  immediately;  virtue,  resting  ex- 
clusively on  knowledge,  is  man's  highest  goal.  Its  chief  trait 
is  battling  against  irrational  desires;  freedom  from  desire 
is  highest  virtue.  Opposed  to  tlmse  the  Cyrenaics  (Aristippos) 
emphasize  the  other  side  of  the  wisdom-life,  happiness.  Hap- 
piness is  the  highest  good — the  goal  of  morality.  'Virtue  is  but 
a  means  to  this  end.  But  happiness  consists  in  the  feeling  of 
pleasure — enjoyment.  Enjoyment  is,  therefore,  the  goal  of 
morality.  By  it  man  becomes  free,  for  it  puts  to  rest  his  dis- 
quieting desires. 

More  specifically.  Both  of  these  schools  seek  an  objective 
basis  for  morality  ;  but  in  fact  both  are  thoroughly  subji 
the  Cynic  beginning  with  subjective  knowledge  and  the  thereby- 
determined  -will,  and  the  Cyrenaics  with  feeling.  Both  are 
one-sidedly  Socratic.  If  knowledge,  virtue,  happiness  are 
essentially  identical,  then  it  is  indifferent  whether  we  say  virtue 
consists  in  unconditional  obedience  to  knowledge,  or  in  Eeeking 
after  happiness.  The  Cynic  is.  therefore,  consistent  when  he 
says,  I  need  only  follow  knowledge,  indiflerenl  as  to  pl< 
or  pain,  for  true  happiness  must  i  pring  from  virtue,  and  what- 
ever feeling  may  contradict  this  is  to  be  despi  ^vy. 
The  Cyrcnaic  is  also  consistent  when  he  says,  1  uecd  oulj  fol- 
low my  pleasurable  feelings,  indifferent  as  to  philosophical 
knowledge,  for  since  happiness  must  spring  from  virtue,  I  have, 
in  my  sensation  of  pleasure,  the  certainty  that  J  practice  virtue 
—that  1  comprehend  tin    .  >od  i  ightly. 

According  to  the  Cynics  there  U  for  the  good  no  othi 
tinguishing  trait,  than  knowledge.     A  knowledge  of  the 
and  a  therewith-accordant  conduct,  ore  the  onl)  things  . 
knowing     Only  the  good  In  \]  only 

the  bad  is  ugly*     Whatever  else  maj   seem  p]  »r  the 


52S  Wuttkc  on  Pre -Plutonic  Ethics.  [October, 

senses  or  feelings  is  perfectly  worthless.     True  freedom  is  per- 
fect indifference  to  every  tiling  exterior  to   the  mind  il 
All  evil  is  error — arises  from  false  impressions  andconcepti 
but  not  from  the  heart.     By  virtue  of  his  knowledge  the 
is  free  from  all  sin. 

In  this  system  the  independence  of  the  individual  mind  is 
pushed  to  an  absurd  extreme, both  in  its  disdainful  indifference 
to  all  objective  reality,  and  in  its  presumptuous  reliance  oi 
own  very  imperfect  subjective  knowledge.  It  leads  to  i 
plete  contempt  of  the  world,  and  of  social  and  civic  customs. 
Whatever  of  half  truth  Cynicism  may  have,  its  practical  appli- 
cation leads  almost  nec<  i'v  fc(  i  mere  caricatures  of  humanity — 
to  a  Diogenes.  The  school,  as  a  whole,  gives  free  scope  to  the 
pride  of  easily-contented  self-righteous  ones. 

The  Cyrenaicsgo  to  the  other  extreme.     A  happiness  that  is 
not  felt  as  pleasure  is  none  at  all.     If  virtue  makes  happy  it 
must  be  through  the  feelings.     Whatever  is  truly  good  evinces 
itself  as  such,  through  the  feeling.-;  and  conversely,  win 
excite-   pleasure  must   be  good,   otherwise  there  would 
happine.-s  that  did  nut  spring  from  virtue.     Between  manifold 
pleasures  there  i    no  e    3iitial  moral  difference,  and  the  ] 
ure-sensation  is  a  perfect  guide  in  the  sphere  of  morals.     The 
chief  object  of  practical  wisdom  is,  therefore,  to  procure  the 
greatest  amount  of  pleasure.     Reflection   must  do  this  work. 
By  reflection,  for  example,  I  find  that  temperance  is  a  virtue, 
for  intemperance  produc*  s  pain.     True  wisdom  con- 
fore,  in   iipding  the  just  limits  of  each  pleasure,  but  not  in  a 
knowledge  of  general  principles.    Each  pleasure  lias  a  different 
measure,  and  this  cau  bo  discovered  by  experience  alone. 
brines  us  down  to  PI — . 


Aiit.  111.— SAUL'S  INTERVIEW  WITH  THE  WITCH    OF 
EKDOR. 

I  SAMUEL  XXVIII, 

The  practice  of   witchcraft  and   necromancy  ia  of  ai 

origin.     We   trace   it    back   through    the  antiquity 

as  far  as  to  the  patriarchal  age,  and  even  then  its  beginning 
readies  on  into  a  remoter  past.     But  whatever  it.>  origin,  and 


1SC9.3       Saul's  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  JEhdor.  5ii'j 

whatever  the  real  nature  of  its  mysteries,  it  is  every-where 
treated  with  sternest  denunciation  by  the  law  of  Cod.     "  Thou 
shalt  not  suffer  a  witch  to  live."  Exod.  xxii,  18.     "Reg 
not  them  that  have  familiar  spirits,  neither  seek  after  wizards, 
to  be  defiled  by  them."  Lev.  xix,  81.     "There  shall  not  be 
found  among  you  anyone  that  maketh  Ids  son  or  his  daughter 
to  pass  through  the  fire,  or  thai  useth  divination,  or  an  obi 
of  times,  or  an  enchanter,  or  a  witch,  or  a  charmer,  or  a  con- 
suiter  with  familiar  spirits,  or  a  wizard,  or  a  necromaucer.* 
For   all  that   do  these  things  are  an   abomination  unto  the 
Lord,  and  because  of  these  abominations  the  Lord  thy  Cod  doth 
drive  them  out  from  before  thee/"  Deut.  xviii,  10-12.     In  this 
last  passage  a  necromancer  is  distinguished  from  a  consulter 
witli   familiar  spirits,  but  one   person   might  practice  many 
forms  of  witchcraft,  so  that  a  consulter  with  familiar  E 
might  also  be  a  necromancer.     Accordingly  we  find  the  Witch 
of  Endor  pretending  to  hold  intercourse  with  the  dead,  tl. 
she  is  called  a  woman  that  had  a  familiar  spirit.     The  primary 
sense  of  the  Hebrew  word.  (r.V)  translated  familiar  spit  i 
sMn-bottle,  and  is  so  rendered  in  Job  xxxii,  19.     The  Scptu- 
agint  renders  it  by  eyyaoroiuvSoc,  a  ventriloquist^  in  refi  pence, 
perhaps,  to  the  manner  in  which  persons  of  tins  crafl 
their   responses.      Hence    Fiirst   defines    the    word    as  ' 
hollow  bell)  of  conjurers,  in  which  the  conjuring  spirit  resides, 
and  speaks  hollow,  as  if  out  of  the  earth." 

Saul's  interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor  has  ever  I 
regarded  as  a  subject  beset  with  peculiar  difficulties.      Justi 
Martyr  and  Origen  held  that,  by  the  incantations  of  the  Witch 
the  spirit  of    Samuel  actually  appeared  and  conversed  with 
Saul.     Modern  Spiritism  has  also  affirm)  d  thai  the  Witcl 
a  medium  through  whom  the  King  o\'  Israel  received  commu- 
nications from  the  Prophet's  Bpirit.     But  the  majority  of  the 
older  expositors,  and  some  few  moderns,  believing  it  absurd 
to  suppose  that  a  holy  prophet  could  b  ■  made  to  i:  c  from  tl  e 
dead  by  the  ministry  of  witchcraft,  regard  tlie  supp  • 
rition  as  Satan  personatii  much*  "  It 

teenth  century,"  says  Iveil,  "  that  tin   opinion  was  express 
that  the  apparition  of  Samuel  was  merely  a  delusion  produced 

*  For  a  thorough  etymologi      <  :    ■•  : 

Cyclopaedia,  or  Bl'Cliatool  aud  Si 


530  Saul's  Int&iview  with  the  Witch  of  F ml  or.     [Oc 

by  the  Witch,  without   any  real   background  at  all.     After 
Reginald    Scotus  and    Balthazar  Bekker  had  given    expres- 
sion to  this  .•pinion,  it  was  more  fully  elaborated  bj  L\ 
Van  Dale,  (1GS3;)  and  in  the  so-called  ago  of  enlighten 
this  was  the  prevailing  opinion,  so  that  Thenins  still  regards 
it  as  an  established  fact,  not  only  that  the  woman  was  .••     ' 
postor,  but  that  the  historian  himself  regarded  the  whoL   I 
as  an  imposture."     The  prevailing  opinion  of  modern  divines 
is,  that  not  by  the-  magic  arts  of  the  Witch,  but  contrary  to 
her  expectations,  and  by  the  express  permission  and  com 
of  God,  the  Prophet  Samuel  actually  appeared  and  spoke  to 
Saul. 

On  the  moral  character  of  witchcraft  there  can  be  no  con- 
troversy. Tt  litis  over  been  associated  with  venality  and  fraud, 
and  boars  the  condemnation  of  God's  holy  law.  Wi 
driven,  therefore,  to  adopt  one  of  two  conclusions.  The 
mysteries  of  divination  are  certain  psychological  phenomena 
not  yet  fully  explained  by  thorough  scientific  investigation 
but.  of  which  Satan  has  taken  advantage  to  deceive  and  les  d 
captive  the  souls  of  men  ;  or  else,  they  are  wrought  by  the 
immediate  supernatural  agency  of  Satan  and  his  angels.  "This 
latter  alternative  we  are  slo^  to  accept.  We  gather  from  the 
Holy  Scriptures  that  (he  evil  spirit  is  so  limited  to  a  certain 
definite  sphere  of  operation  that  he  is  never  allowed  to  use 
supernatural  power  to  mislead  where  there  is  only  human 
.capacity  to  resist.  Much  more  plausible,  then  fore,  is  the, 
supposition  that  the  marvelous  feats  of  magic  and  witch- 
have  a  physiological  and  psychological  bads  in  the  human 
constitution. 

Careful  and  continued  investigations  in  Clai\ 
within  the  last  century,  shed  much  light  on  the  mysterii 
magic.     We  know  that  men  have  charmed  serpents  and  ser- 
pents have  charmed  men.     Why,  then,  should  v.e  doubl  that 
man  can  charm  man  \      We  cannot  doubt  it,  for  the  thim 
often  been  done,  and  it  has  been  shown  beyond  succes  fill  con- 
tradiction tli  at,  Iu  accord  a  ice  with  certain  laws  of  our  b 
one  person  can  so  fascinate  another,  and  |  : 
electrical  rapport  with  his  soul,  as  to  become  sensible  of  \ 
he  feels  or  imagines.     This  power,  however,  exists  in  diffi  ii  ni 
degrees.     £  >ns  it  seems  impos  ible  to  mesmerize  at 


1869.]        Saul's  Intemiew  with  the  Witch  of  JEi       .  531 

all,  or  at  most  only  by  long-continued  efforts  on  the  part  of 
the  operator;  others  are  highly  susceptible  to  mesmeric  opera- 
tions, and  are  easily  thrown  into  a  clairvoyant  state.  Others, 
again,  have  the  rare  power  of  spontaneously  inducing  upon 
themselves  the  clairvoyant  state,  and  then  seem  to  revel  at 
pleasure  amid  the  things  that  belong  to  the  spiritual  world. 
In  this  state  some,  with  their  ever-  closed  and  bandaged,  will 
accurately  describe  persons  and  places  that  are  far  away, 
and  that  could  have  been  known  to  them  at  the  time  only 
by  some  inner  sight.     Now  by  coming  in  dir  tional 

contact  with  the   soul  of  another,  the  superior  clairvoyant 
becomes     cognizant    of    the     emotions     that    are    agitating 
there.      By  the  power  of  an    inner  vision   he   sees   in 
soul   the  images   and   impressions   that  are   deeply  wrought 
on  the  imagination  and  memory. 

The   limits    and    design    of  this  dissertation    preclude 
attempt  at  a  physiological  and  psychological  explanation  of 
clairvoyance.*      But  the  facts  by  which  the  abov  •    ta1 
may  be  sustained  are  all  but  innumerable,  and  will  nol 
questioned  by  those  who  have  given  the  subject   a  }  i 
examination.     These  facts  cannot  be  without  cause,  and  I 
must  be  some  clew  to  the  mystery  that  surrounds  {hens.     ~\Ye 
believe  that   the  only  successful  way  to  refute   and   put   to 
silence  the  pretensions  of  witchcraft  is,  not  by  denying  her  well- 
authenticated  facts,  and  in  the  spirit  of  Popish  p  srsc- 
euting  all  attempts  at  their  scientific  im               n,  but  by 
showing  that  all  her  lying  wonders  in  the  past  are  trac 
to  a  foul  and  unholy  use  of  powers  peculiar  to  ousti- 
tutions,  but  which  were  not  at  the  time  understood.     It  fell 
noi  within  the  province  of  divine  revelation  to  commn 
scientific  instruction  on  this  or  any  other  subject,  and  tin  r» 
we  are  not,  to  look  to  the  Bible  for  an  exposition  of  any  prob- 
lem in    nature  which  it  is  the  proper  pi 
explain.     I>ut  between   the  revelations   of  the   Bible  ai 

*  Those  v.i  ' 

hology  :  or,  the  Science  of  l 

ally,"  by  Dr.  M  See 

ing,"   by  John   B.  N"<  wi  ian,   M.  D.;     i         Del 
Part  IV.  sections  12  ai 


532  SauVs  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  £?idor.     [October, 

Bcienoe  there  can   be  no  real  antagonism,  for  they  arc  both 
offspring  of  the  everlasting  Father. 

We  understand  that  the  Witch  of  Endor  was  a  clairvoyant 
of  extraordinary  power;  that  she  could  spontaneously  place 
herself  in  sensational  intercourse  with  the  souls  of  those  who 
came-  to  inquire  of  her ;  and  thai  with  this  power  she  united 
the  practice  of  lying  and  deceit  as  she  found  occasion  to 
her  own  dark  purposes.  We  hope  to  show  by  fair  and  worthy 
criticism,  that,  upon  this  hypothesis,  the  narrative  before  us  is 
capable  of  a  happy  and  consistent  explanation;  and  at  the 
proper  places  in  the  course  of  the  discussion,  we  shall  urge 
what  we  regard  as  insuperable  objections  to  the  commonly 
received  interpretation,  which  assumes  an  actual  appearance 
of  Samuel. 

A  preliminary  question,  worthy  of  a  passing  notice,  is, 
How  did  the  writer  of  this  book  of  Samuel  become  acquainted 
with  the  facts  winch  he  lias  here  recorded  ?  There  are  two 
supposable  ways,  lie  could  have  received  his  information  by 
immediate  revelation  from  the  Holy  Spirit,  or  from  the  testi- 
mony of  eye-witnesses.  There  arc  tilings  recorded  in  the  holy 
Scriptures  which  could  have  been  learned  only  by  dir<  el  reve- 
lation from  Heaven  ;  but  where  the  things  recorded  are  of 
such  a  nature  as  not  to  need  a  miraculous  revelation  to 
communicate  them,  we  have  no  sufficient  reason  to  believe 
that  such  a  revelation  was  given.  We  therefore  conclude 
that  our  author  received  his  information  originally  from  the 
two  men  (verse  S)  who  accompanied  Saul  to  Endor,  and  were 
undoubtedly  eve   and    ear  witnesses  of  all  tha  d  to 

him  there. 

The  sacred  writer  introduces  the  narrative  by  reminding 
readers  of  a  fact  already  recorded  in  the  previous  history,  that 
Samuel  was  dead  and  buried,     lb'  also  inl'  ael  of 

Saul's  reign  no!  recorded  elsewhere,  by  which  all  \ 
dieted  to  the  divining  art  had  been  driven  mil  of  the  land  el* 
Israel.  This  had  be,  n  done  in  accordance  with  the  law.  (Exod. 
xxiij  IS  ;  Lev.  w.  27,)  and  perhaps  by  the  advice  el'  the  Prophet 
Samuel  at  an  earl;-  period  of  Saul's  reign.  The  deadly  perse- 
cution had  caused  all  witches  that  could  escape  to  the  from  the 
land,  or  else  hid,'  themselves  in  ('ark  places  of  the  wilder] 
One  female  necromancer  had  concealed  herself  in  the  ca 


1809.)        Saul's  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.  533 

al  Endor,*  and  her  dark  retreat  was  known  to  some  of  Saul's 

servants. 

In  order  to  appreciate  the  wretched  and  abandoned  slate  of 
Saul  at  the  time  of  his  intercourse  with  the  woman  at  Endor, 

we  should  glance  back  for  a  moment  over  the  misfortunes 
which  befell  him  after  his  first   transgression  at  Gilgal.  Chap, 
xiii.      At  that  time  the  Prophet  announced  to  him  thai 
kingdom  should   not  be  established   in   his  posterity,  but  be 

given  to  one  who  had  a  better  heart  than  he.  .And  yet  in 
the  war  Avith  Amalek  another  fair  trial  was  given  him,  and 
again  he  showed  himself  stubborn  and  rebellious.  Chap.  xv. 
Then  Samuel  uttered  against  him  the  final  oracles  of  judgment: 
"Because  thou  hast  rejected  the  word  of  the  Lord,  he  also 
hath  rejected  thee  from  being  king."  And  as  the  venerable 
Prophet  turned  to  leave  him,  Saul,  seized  by  sudden  fear  and 
trembling,  violently  grasped  the  skirt  of  his  mantle,  and  it.  rent  in 
his  hands.  Usingthe  imagery  thus  afforded,  Samuel  immediately 
said  to  Saul,  "  The  Lord  hath  rent  the  kingdom  of  Israel  from 
thee  this  day,  and  hath  given  it  to  a  neighbor  of  thine  that  is 
better  than  thou."  This  was  the  last  iuterview  with  Saul  that. 
Samuel  ever  had;  (verse  35;)  for  though  Saul  afterward  i 
into  Samuel's  presence  at  Ramah,  (chap,  xix,  2L)  and  prophe- 
sied') before  him,  they  had  no  intercourse  with  each  ether. 

From  the  time  pf  Samuel's  last  interview  with  him  the  Spirit 
of  the  Lord  departed  from  Saul.  Chap,  xvi,  14.  The  divine 
influences  of  which  lie  had  been  made  a  partaker  at  the  be- 
ginning of  his  career,  (see  chap,  x,  10;  xi,  6,)  were  withdrawn 
from  him,  and  Grod  no  longer  inspired  him  to  noble  euterp 
Then  "  an  evil  spirit  from  the  Lord  troubled  him."  A  demon, 
sent  by  command  of  the  Almighty,  like,  those  so  often  mention- 
ed in  the  New  Testament,  entered  into  him,  and  to  >fc   p 

:;'  Endor,  the  mo  lern 
the  Philistine  army  encamp  >  reach  it  from  the  heights  oi  l 

and  his  two  men  must  have  pari  .      a  n   i.     ] 

village  is  overhung  bj  a  di  rtivity  which  ia  full  of  co 
I  tl«  Book,"  vol.  ii.  p.  IG1. 

•|  S  nil's  pro]  :  at  H  unali  was    [>i 

upon  David,     lie  was  seized  bj  an  unseen,  irr  r,  which  caused  him 

to  Bill  down,  and,  Balaan  like,  predict  1  i 

heart  at  other  times  ho  would  gl    Uy  I    ■     curs    I  hii  .    <  rds  at  a 

1  '•  r  time,  chap,  xxiv,  20;  :o.\i.  25. 

Foi  rth  Series,  Vol.  XXL— 34 


534  SauVs  Interview  with  tlie  Witch  of  Endor.    [Octolx  r, 

sion  of  his  soul.     But  while  he  thus  became  possessed  by  a 
supernatural  evil  power,  if  is  very  likely  that  a  mental  dise 
bordering  on  insanity,  was  the  substratum  on  which  the  evil  spirit 
worked.    After  Samuel's  last  words  of  judgment  {Ik-  King  i 
not  be  happy  in  his  kingdom.     The  more  he  thought  upon  his 
doom  the  more  it  harrowed  np  his  soul.     It  was,  perhaps,  his 
highest  ambition   to  be  the  father  of  a  race  of  kings,  and  to 
have  this  hope  suddenly  dashed  from  him  was  to  have 
ness  settle  over  all  his  life.     "  The  Hebrew  mind,"  soys  Kitto, 
"so  linked  itself  to  the  future  by  the  contemplation  of  poster- 
ity, that  it  is  scarcely  possible  to  us,  with  our  looser  att&clu 
to  the  time  beyond  ourselves,  to  apprehend  in  all  its  intensity 
the   deep   distress    of   mind    with   which   any    Hebrew,    and 
.much  more  a  king,  regarded  the  prospect  that  there  wou 

'Xo  son  of  .  •-.'•"' 

Saul's  future  thus  became  full  of  ghostly  images,  and  v 
disengaged  at  times  from  the  excitements  of  war  and 
of  government,  he  sat  down  to  think  over  his  i   for- 

tunes, his  mind  and  heart,  forsaken   of  all  divine  influ 
from  Jehovah,  became  an  easy  prey  to  foul  suspicions   and 
gloomy  fears— a  most  inviting  state  for  demoniacal  possession. 
The  evil  spirit,  entering  and  reveling  amid  these  mental  dis- 
orders, carried  him  at  times  to  the  wildest  height  of  ma 
and  derangement. 

We  need  not  linger  to  trace  onward  the  successive  misfor- 
tunes of  the  unhappy  Saul.     They  thoroughly  convinced  him 
that  his  <>\vu  reign  must  soon  terminate,  and  he  knew 
David  would  succeed  him.  Chap,  xxiv,  20;  xxv,  25;  coi 
al    .  xxiii,  17.      When  now  he  saw  the  mighty  host  of  the 
Philistines  as  embleand  encamp  at  Shuncm,  armed  an  I 
tor  a   most  de  perate   battle,  there   fastened    upon    his 
the  dark  presentiment  that  his  end  was  nigh.     Fearful  h 
must  have  been  his  emotions  as  the  darkness  of  that  last 
gathered  around  him  on  the  heij  I      of  I 
past  comes  up  before  him.  and  tin 
departed   Samuel  seem  to  ring  again  upon  hi,  e 
in  memory  he  stands  at  Gilgal,  and. 
Samuel,  wrapped  in  hi.  mantle,  rises  up  before  hum 
shall  he  do  to   relievo  his   burdened  spirit;      Hia  p  . 


1869.]        SauVs  Interview  with  theWitch  of  Endor.  535 

strength  is  departing  from  him,  for  all  day  and  all  night  thus 
far  he  lias  taken  no  nourishment.     He  calls  around  him  the 
most  distinguished  of  Samuel's  school  of  prophets,  but  they  can 
give  no  comfort.,  for  neither  by  vision   nor  by  dream  (Num. 
xii,  6)  has  Jehovah  given  them  any  message  for  Saul.      One 
mure  resort  for  him  is  to  inquire  by  the  urim  on  the  eph 
the  high  priest,  a  priest  whom  he  had  probably  himself  appi  ' 
in  the  room  of  the  slaughtered  Ahimelech.  Chap,  xxii,  18.    But 
how  could  he  expect  an  answer  from  that  source  when  the  blood 
of  eighty-five  priests  was  on  his  soul  ?     To  him  all  holy  or 
are  dumb,  and  he  realizes  the  awful  truth  that  he  is  Go  l-for- 
saken.     "I   am  sore  distressed,"  he  cries.     "The  Philistines 
make,  war  against  me,  and  God  is  departed  from  me,  and  answer- 
eth  me  no  more.*'     Whatever  dim  and  visionary  hopes  he  may 
have  cherished  hitherto,  all  now  are  crushed,  and  the  foul  spi 
that  had  formerly  been  driven  from  him  by  the  magic  power 
of  David's  harp  again  hovers  about  him  and  fills  his  imagina- 
tion with  ghostly  specters.     What  shall  he  do  ''.     With  fell  pur- 
pose, and  that  impulsive  rashness  which  was  ever  his  easily  ■  b 
ting  sin,  he  resolves  to  take  counsel  of  one  who  pretends  to  hold 
communion  with  the  dead.     Swept  down  by  the  raging  i 
ract  of  accumulating  woes,  he  still,  like  a  drowning  man,  grai  ps 
at  a  straw.     Surely  no  necromancer  ever  wished  for  ab 
subject  to  impose  upon  than  was  Saul  when  he  approached  the 
Witch  of  Endor. 

Saul  so  carefully  disguised  himself  that  the  woman  did  nol 
recognize  him  when  he  came  into  her  presence.  Nothing 
could  have  been  further  from  her  thoughts  than  that  the  I 
of  Israel,  at  that  dark  hour  of  midnight,  and  when  the  Philis- 
tine army  lav  between  his  camp  and  Endor,  was  presenting 
himself  to  inquire  of  her.  The  King  made  known  his  errand 
in  language  such  as  one  who  inquired  of  a  ni  nicer  would 

naturally  use:    "Divine  unto  me  .by  the  familiar  spirit,  and 
bring  me  tip  whom  ]  shall  name  unto  thee."     Her  su 
were  at   once   aroused,   and  she  charged  hira  with  layii 
snare  for  her  life.     Bui  Saul  Bwaro  unto  herb)  Jehovah  that 
no  harm  >\>^\\Vt  b(  fall  her  ;  and  when  i  he  a  ked  him  whom  lie 
would  consult,  he  said,  ••  Bring  me  op  Samuel."     Whal  i 
arts  or  incantations  she  proceeded  to  make  use  of  \ 
told  ;  but  the  next  utterance  we  have  from  her  is  one  of  excite- 


536  Saul's  Interview  with  theWitch  of  Endor.  [October, 

ment  and  alarm  :  ""Wliy  hast  thou  deceived  me?  for  thou  art 
Saul." 

How  did  the  woman   learn    so  pood    that  her  gu< 
Saul  ?     To  tlii-  question  the  advocates  of  the  common  int 
tation  hare  failed  to  give  any  satisfactory  answer.     Somi 
that  she  inferred  it  from  the  venerable  appearance  of  Samuel. 
But  how  could  this  be  \     There  is  no  evidence  that  she  had  i  ■<■ 
seen  Samuel  before;  and  even  if  she  had.  we  fail  to  see  how 
mere  appearance  on  this  occasion  could  have  convinced   the 
Witch  that  it  was  Saul  who  inquired  of  her.     Others  saj 
she  learned  it  from  something  that  Samuel  said.     But  as  yel 
Samuel  had  not  spoken.     Rabbi  Abrabanel  supposes  that  when 
Samuel  appeared  he  reverently  bowed  to  Saul,  from  which  the 
woman  inferred  that  her  consulter  could  be  no  less  a  person 
than   the  King   of  Israel.     This  supposition,  however,  is   too 
absurd   to   need    any  refutation.      But   understand   that    the 
woman  was  a  clairvoyant,  and  the  answer  to  this  questii  : 
comes  easy  and  simple.     Tin's  is  acknowledged  by  Keil,  the 
recent  commentator,  though  in  his  exposition  of  the  pa 
he  teaches  that  Samuel  actually  appeared.     He  says,  "Her 
recognition  of  Saul  when  Samuel  appeared  may  be  easily  ex- 
plained if  we  assume  that  the  woman  had  fallen  into  a  state  of 
clairvoyance,  in  which  she  recognized  persons  who,  like  Said 
in  his  disguise,  were  unknown  to  her  by  face." 

Bui  the  writer  say-.  ik  The  woman  saw  Samuel."  Yes,  we  re]  1I3  ; 
the  clairvoyant  o\'  real  power  (and  our  interpretation  assumes 
that  the  woman  of  Endor  was  such)  can  place  herself  in 
electrical  or  sensational  rapport  with  another's  soul  as  to 
hoc '100  cognizant  of  what  is  imaged  there,  and  in  tin's  way 
the  woman  of  Endor  not  only  learned  who  her  distinguished 
consulter  was.  but  she  saw  prominent  among  the  images  that 
were  pictured  on  his  excited  imagination  the  venerable  form 
of  the  mantled  Samuel.  She  saw  him  just  as  he  appeared  fo 
Saul  the  last  time,  and  just  tern  and  threatening  form 

had  haunted  thai  monarch's  s  ml  for  many  years. 

The  mass  of  interpreters  have  strangely   i     irtned  th  I 
woman's  alarm  and  outcry  must  havi  1  ed  !>\  the  bu  I 

den  and  unexpected  appc:  'Samuel.     She  saw  Samuel, 

indeed,  and  the  manner  in  which  she  saw  him  in  Said's  excited 
soul  was  one  moans  of  her  recognizing  Saul.     Bui  her 


1869J       SauVs  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.  537 

words  most  clearly  show  that  her  alarm  was  not  at  the  sight 
of  Samuel,  but  at  finding  that  the  very  monarch  of  Israel  had 
himself  detected  her  in  her  Borceries.  ~\Ye  understand  that 
the  alarm  of  the  woman  was  so  great  at  her  re  •  Saul 

that  she  came  out  of  her  clairvoyant  state.    What  she  ha  ' 
seen  in  that  one  vision  of  Saul's  soul  was  a  sufficient  basi    I   i 
her  to  devise  and  utter  the  responses  which  follow,  and  which 
pretend  to  come  from  Samuel. 

The  Xing-  was  convinced  that  she  had  seen  some  marvelous 
sight,  and  after  quieting  her  fear.-,  he  ashed  her  whi  I 
She  replied,  "I  saw  gods  ascending  out  of  the  earth."  The 
word  --"';s\  gods,  is  somewhat  indefinite,  and  by  it  she  may 
have  meant  one  thing  and  he  have  understood  another.  But  did 
she  see  gods?  We  must  remember  that  these  words  are  the 
sayings  of  a  witch,  and  she  alone,  not  the  writer  of  them, 
nor  the  interpreter,  is  responsible  for  their  truth.  Whether 
true  or  false,  we  regard  them  as  a  part  of  the  devices  by  which 
she  sought  to  terrify  and  impose  upon  Saul  and  his  servants. 
But  we  have  every  reason  to  believe  that  at  the  moment  she 
became  clairvoyant  Saul's  soul  was  full  of  ghostly  fears. 
Dark  specters  haunted  his  imagination,  and  he  expected  i 
moment  to  see  some  strange  apparition  start  up  in  horrid 
reality  before  him.  As  she  looks  in  upon  this  disordered 
of  bis  soul,  and  sees  these  ghostly  pictures  pass  like  so  many 
shadows,  over  his  wild  imagination,  she  aptly  describes  the 
sight  as  that  of  gods  coming  up  otit  of  the  earth. 

'Then  Saul  asked,  "  What  is  his  form  '.  "     He  uses  the  Bin- 
gular  iTOi,  his  form,  though  the  Witch  had  spoken   in  the 
plural,  of  gods.     She  probably  alluded  to  the  g 
which   she  saw  in  his  imagination,  of   which  the    im;i 
Samuel   was    the    most    prominent  ;    but   he,    ex] 
sec  the  dead   Samuel  arise,  or  hear  him  speak,  1  in 

bis   soul  the  image  of   that    Prophet   as  he  1..  . 

him.     The  clairvoyant  having  seen  that  form  altogether  j 
incut  in  hi  '^n 

oldmancometh  up,  and  he  is  covered  with  a  ma., 
could  nol  ■  '  Samuel  except  in  i 

mantle  whose  skirt  he  laid  hold  of  and  rent  when  the  Prophet 
uttered  against  him  the  last  bitter  oracle  of  judgment.    1  ■ 
xv,  27. 


538        Saul '*  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.     [Oct 

"And  Saul  perceived  that  it  was  Samuel."  Observe,  it  is 
not  said  thai  Saul  sa"v\  Samuel.  He  formed  his  opinion  enti 
from  the  woman's  words.  She  described  the  form  of  Samuel 
exactly  as  he  appeared  at  Gilgal — an  old  man  wearing  a  man- 
tle-: -and  from  this  description,  not  from  actual  Bight,  he  knew 
(?--,  Sept.  eyvu,  Vulg.  intcUexit)  that  it  was  Samuel.  So 
overpowering  was  the  impression  thus  made  upon  his  mind, 
and  so  awe-strnck  was  he  with  the  thought  oi'  the  Pro:  I 
presence,  that  "he  stooped  with  Ins  face  to  the  ground  and 
bowed  himself." 

"And  Samuel  said  to  Sard."  Did, then,  Samuel  actually 
Bpeak?  We  understand  that  as  the  "Witch  did  all  fc] 
for  Saul,  so  also  she  did  all  the  speaking  to  him.  She  was  the 
medium  both  of  sight  and  sound.  The  Septuagint  version 
calls  her  a  ventriloquist,  and  she  may  have  caused  her  voice 
to  sound  from  some  dark  corner,  so  that  Saul  and  hit  servants 
believed  it  to  be  the  voice  of  Samuel.  But  it  is  not  ] 
to  suppose  this.  Saul  unqiu  stionably  believed  that  the  woman 
was  holding  intercourse  with  the  real  Samuel,  and  reporting 
to  him  what  Samuel  said.  And  so  any  one,  who  sought  unto 
the  dead  in  this  way,  though  lie  saw  and  heard  the  necro- 
mancer utter  the  communication  with  her  own  lips,  if  he  be- 
lieved that  it  came  from  the  person  sought  would  naturally 
speak  of  it  in  this  way.  So  when  Saul's  servants  afterward 
reported  this  interview  they  would  naturally  say,  "Samuel 
said  to  Saul;*'  not  "  the  woman  said  to  Saul;"  lor  they  un- 
doubtedly believed  that  the  communication  came  from  Sai 

It  should  here  be  observed  how  perfectly  non-committi  ; 
sacred  historian  is  in  recording  this  mysterious  transaction. 
lie  records  the  whole  matter  precisely  ns  it  was  reported  to 
him  by  the  two  eye-witnesses,  and  these  witnesses  reported  ii 
precisely  as    it    appeared    to   them.    We   believe  thai    S 
servants  were  imposed  upon  and  deceived.      They   beli 
that  Samuel  had  spoken  to  their  King;  but  the  sacred  \ 
expresses  no  opin  ion  in  the  case.     Hemayhave  I  their 

report  as  they  did,  but  he  does  not  say  so.    And  in  this  r 
the  sacred  writers  are  al! 

commit  themselves  1"  any  explanation  <>r  the  mysteries  which 
they  record.     They  represent  the  magician 
ino-  miracles  in  opposition  to  Moses,  but  tbeymal  duo  attempt 


1S69J       SauVs  Inii  vol.  w  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.  539 

to  indicate  or  explain  the  nature  of  those  miracles.  Nor  need 
we  suppose  that  they  themselves  had  any  settled  opinions  in 
the  case.  They  recorded  many  things  which  they  did  not 
understand,  and  though  they  may  have  inquired  and  sear* 
diligently  into  their  nature,  the  Holy  Spirit  has  signally  pre- 
served them  from  expressing  their  own  conclusions. 

Thus  far,  then,  Ave  find   no   evidence  that  Samuel  actually 
appeared.      The  words  "Samuel   said  to    Saul"   necessarily 
imply  at  most  only  that  Saul  and  his  two  servants  believed 
and  reported  that    Samuel  had    actually  spoken.     Who   can 
show  that  the  words  must  necessarily  mean  more?     The  nar- 
rative also  very  clearly  teaches  that  Saul  himself  saw  nothing. 
He  believed  from  the  woman's  representation  of  her    \' 
that  Samuel  was  there,  but  he  saw  him  not.     We  have  also 
observed  that  the  woman's  alarm  was  caused  by  her  r 
nition  of  Saul,  not  by  the  appearance  of  Samuel.     But  while 
we  find  no  evidence  of  an  actual  appearance  of  Samuel,  there 
are  several  considerations  which   convince  us  that  that  holy 
Prophet  had  no  personal  connection  at  all  with  this  affair  at 
Endor.     First,  the  manner  of  his  appearance.     He  is  r< 
sented  as  an  old  man,  coining  up  out  of  the  earth,  and  cov<  re  I 
with  a  mantle.     If  now  he  really  came  from  Paradise,  i 
passing  strange  that  he  should  have  appeared  in  this  way. 
Can  we  well  believe  that  a  sainted  prophet  would  return  from 
the  world  of  glory,  bearing  the  marks  of  decrepitude  and  i 
and  wearing  again  the   cast-off  garments  of  his  uiorli  ' 
And  is  it  not  more  natural  to  suppose   thai  he  would  have 
appeared,  not  as  coming  up  out  of  the  earth,  but  as  co 
down  from  above?     Another  more  weighty  consideration  is 
the  time  and  occasion  of  his  appearance — after  Jcl 
refused  to  answer  Saul  by  urim  and  by  prophets,  and  au 
ently  through  the  medium  of  a  witch!     [t  has  often 
that  Samuel  appeared  at  the  command  of  God,  and  n< 
any  in  tality  of  the  Witch,  but  this  statement  is  utterly 

>'        ate  i  from  the  narrative.     The  woman  !■■ 

conf<  -■•<  d  th  •  her  alarm  wa    al  recognizing  Saul,  in 
Samuel.     We  have  i  ;cd  that  she  did  all  the    • 

She  &aw  the  god  i  i  n  ling;  she  saw  the  dd  man  with 
mantle;  and  il  wasonly  after  she  told  her  vi  ion  that  Saul  ! 
(not  saw)  that  it  was  Samuel.     Theiv  who  affirm  thai 


5-10  Saul's  Interview  with  the  Witch  ofEndor.    [October, 

Samuel   appeared  to  Saul,  or  that  ho  came  contrary  to  the 
woman's  expectations,  and  not  by  her  sorcery,  have  the  whole 
narrative  against  them.     Consider  then  the  utter  absurdil 
maintaining  that,  after  the  law  had  uttered  its  heaviest  ex< 
lions  against  all  forms  of  witchcraft,  and  after  Jehovah  had 
refused  to  answer  Saul  by  urim,  by  prophets,  and  by  drc 
the  Holy  One  then  sent  Samuel  from  heaven  to  answer  him 
through  the  agency  of  a  miserable  witch! 

Still  another  consideration  at  war  with  the  supposition  that 
Samuel  actually  appeared  and  spoke  on  this  occasion,  is  the 
nature  of  the  communication  itself  which  pretends  to  i 
from  him.  A  careful  examination  of  his  words  will  show  that 
he  uttered  nothing  worth  calling  a  saint  from  heaven  to  tell, 
nothing  which  the  woman  might  not,  under  the  circur 
and  having  the  excited  soul  of  Saul  unvailed  to  her  inner 
sense,  have  most  naturally  devised  to  awe  and  terrify  the 
King,  and  perfect  upon  him  her  imposition.  Let  us  examine 
the  language. 

The  first  utterance  is  unworthy  of  a  holy  prophet  sent  on  a 
mission  of  God  from  the  land  o]'  the  blest  :  <;  W"hy  hast  :' 
disquieted  me  to  bring  me  up  '."  The  Hiphil  of  the  verb  tan, 
in  every  place,  where  it  occurs,*  signifies  to  di  .  quiet* 
or  alarm.  In  Job  xii,  6,  it  is  rendered  provoke.  The  common 
interpretation  affirms  that  Samuel  rose  from  the  dead  by  spe- 
cial permission  and  express  command  of  God.  How,  then, 
could  the  Prophet  truthfully  say  that  Saul  had  disturbed  lum  ?. 
Can  il  be  aught  but  a  pleasure  for  any  of  the  saints  in  light  to 
obey  Jehovah's  orders  '.  Or  if  the  order  besupposed  to  involve 
a  painful  duty,  would  it  not  be  rebellion  for  the  servant  to 
complain  \  IIow  absurd,  in  the  light  of  Christian  trut 
imagine  the  Bainted  Samuel  coming  at  the  command  of  God 
from  the  world  of  spirits,  and  angrily  complaining  .to  Saul  that 
he  had  disquieted  him!  Surely  the  question  Bavors  nioi 
the  theology  of  I  lieni  m  than  of  Holy  Scripture,  and  is 
explicable  only  when  regarded  as  a  device  of  thi  ,  itch  to  awe 
and  subject  to  her  own  will  the  soul  of  Saul. 

We  pass  to  the  next  nttera    •    :    "  Wherefore  dosl  thon 
of  me.  seeing  the  Lord   is  departed   from  thee,  and  i 
thine  enemy?"     It  required  no  prophet  to  rise  from  the  ■ 

*Jub  ix,  C;  xii,  Gj   rs.  xiii,  13;   siv,  It.;  ss\:\,  11  ;  Jer.  1,  31 


1SC9.]      Saul's  Intei-view  with  the  Witch  of  1  oil 

to  suggest  this  question  co  the  God-forsaken  King;  and  if  we 
regard  it  as  any  thing  more  than  another  device  of  the  woman 
to  increase  Saul's  terror,  we  involve  ourselves  in  the  absurdity, 
already  presented  above,  of  supposing  that  after  Jehovah  had 
in  his  law  condemned  all  seeking  unto  necromancers,  and  after 
he  had  refused  to  answer  the  King  by  urira  aud  h\  proph<  ts,  he 
nevertheless  disturbed  a  holy  prophet  from  hi-  rest  in.  heaven, 
and  suffered  him  to  rise  from  the  dead  apparently  as  ii  forced 
up  against  his  will  by  the  arts-  of  witcheraf  ! 

If,  now,  the  reader  will  turn  to  chapter  xv,  which  contains 
account  of  Samuel's  last  interview  with  Saul,  he  will  find  that 
the  following  words  are  in  substance  a  repetition  of  ver  *  -  IS, 
26,  and  2S  of  that  chapter:  "  The  Lord  hath  done  for  himself* 
as  he  spake  by  me;  fur  the  Lord  hath  rent  the  kingdom  out  of 
thine  hand,  and  given  it  to  thy  neighbor,  even  to  David  : 
cause  thou  obeyedst  not  the  voice  of  the  Lord,  nor  ■ 
his  fierce  wrath  upon  Amalek,  therefore  hath  the  Lord  dune 
this  thing  unto  thee  this  day.1'  Now  we  submit  whether  any 
expositor  has  ever  shown  or  can  show  a  worthy  reason  for  Sam- 
uel's coming  from  Abraham's  bosom  to  repeat  these  words  to 
Saul,  who  already  had  them  deeply  imprinted  on  hi-  memory. 
If  Lazarus  could  not  revisit  the  world  to  warn  the  living  of 
their  danger  because  they  had  Moses  and  the  Prophets,  (Luke 
xvi,  31,)  still  less  can  we  suppose  that  a  sainted  prophet  would 
be"  permitted  to  return  and  repeat  to  an  incorrigible  trans- 
gressor the  very  oracles  of  his  earthly  ministry. 

Next   follows  the  only  utterance  of  all  this  ;■ 
munication  of  Samuel    that    seems    to    in  iperhuman 

knowledge:  " The  Lord  will  also  deliver  Israel  with  tl 
the  hand  of  the  Philistines,  and  to-morrow  shall  thou  and  thy 
son-  be  with  me  ;  the  Lord  also  shall  deliver  the  host  of  I  rael 
into  the  hand  of  the  Philistines."  If  there  is  any  thing  in  the 
entire  pas-age  that  looks  like  a  communication  from  n  super- 
natural source  it  is  here.  But  where,  in  this  predictii  .  : 
involved  any  conceivable  obje  I    importan 

Saul  or  to  any  one  else  to  call  Samuel  from  the  '•       Id  t" 

tell  1     Dr.  Clarke  says  that   "Samuel   did   actually  nop: 

*  i. 
o!  hi    i   ...  purposes.  ' 


5-12         SauV 8  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.     [October, 

Saul;  and  that  ho  was  sent  by  the  especial  mercy  of  G 
warn   this  infatuated  king  of  his  approaching  death,  that  he 
might  have  an  opportunity  to  make  his  peace  with  his  Maker." 
But  there  is  no  shadow  of  evidence  that  Samuel  actually  ap- 
peared to  Saul  at  all;  and  if  such  an  unusual  effort  had  been 
made  by  the  mercy  of  God  to  secure  Saul's  conversion  I 
his  death,  is  it  not  passing  strange  that  no  intimation  either  of 
its   success  or  failure  is  anywhere   given   us  in   the  word  of 
God?     Then  we  may  observe  that  the  words  "thou  and  thy 
sons  shall  be  with  me"  arc  somewhat  open  to  suspicion.     It 
is  usually  understood    that  the   words  with    me   refer  to  the 
state  of  the  dead  generally,    and  were  spoken  in  accordance 
with    the    ideas    of  that    age  ;    but   we    submit   whether    a 
holy   prophet,   fresh   from  Paradise,  who  must  have    known 
that  in    that  world   there  was  a  great    and    impassable   gulf 
between  the  righteous  and  the  wicked,  (Luke  xvi,  26,)  would 
have  expressed  himself  in  this  way.     If  Saul  died  in  hi 
as  we  have  every  reason  to  suppose,  how  was  lie,  a  vile  t 
gressor,    to    become     at    once    associated    with    the    sainted  . 
prophet '(    Jesus  said  to  the  dying  thief,  "  To-day  shalt  thou  be 
with  me  in   Paradise;"  hut   we  have  evidence  of  the  thiefs 
repentance    and    conversion,    none    whatever    of   Saul's.     In 
1  Chronicles    x.   13,  we   read,  ''Said  died    for  his  transj 
sion...  and  also  for  asking  by  a  familiar  spirit  to  inq 
(ur.vip  rriao  -"V-;";.)     How  could  this  be  according  to  Cla 
opinion  ?    Punished  with  death  for  inquiring  at  a  source  whence 
he  received  revelations  which  enabled  him  ';  to  make  his  j 
with  his  Maker "  before  death,  and  attain  to  everlasting         I 
Finally  we  ask,  what   is  there  in  this  prediction  more  won- 
derful than  what  many  a  second-rate  fortune-teller  of  modern 
times,  under  the  same  circumstances,  might   have  told  '.     The 
woman  saw  all  Saul's  despair  and  terror.     ELehimseli 
in  her  presence,    "I  am  list  :  for   the    Philistines 

make  war  against  me,  and  God  is  departed  from  me,  and  an- 
swereth  me  no  more."  She  knew  that  the  Philistines  had 
even  probability  of  victory  on  the  i  '&ub' 

probable  that  Saul  had  the  dark  presentiment  <  ; 
mirrored  in  Id-  soul.     Thi  irvoyant  i 

havesoen.    She  might  have  discerned  in  the  tendencies  < 
emotional  nature  a  settled  purpose   1"  commit    suicide  ra*hoi 


1869.3       Said's  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.  543 

than  fall  a  living  prey  into  the  hands  of  the  uncireumcised 
Philistines.     Sue  might  also  have  seen  in  that  soul-picture  the 

image  of  the  monarch's  sons.  For  them  he  trembled  as  well 
as  for  his  kingdom,  and  the  bitterest  drop  in  his  cup  of  sorrows 
was  the  prospect  that  his  name  and  lineage  would  be  cut  off. 
Chap,  xxivj  21.  She  might  have  been  persuaded  that  warriors 
like  Jonathan,  A.binadab,  and  Malclu-shua  were  no  more 
likely  to  survive  defeat  than  their  father.  Look  now  at  all 
these  things  which  the  woman  had  before  her,  and  where  is 
there  aught  exceedingly  wonderful  in  this  announcement  ?  In 
such  a  crisis  as  was  sure  to  come  upon  the  morrow,  Saul's 
own  death  could  hardly  be  uncertain.  This  had  possibly  be- 
come a  foregone  conclusion  in  his  own  mind,  and  had  driven 
him  in  such  madness  of  despair  to  inquire  of  one  that  had  a 
familiar  spirit. 

We  conclude,  then,  that  this  pretended  communication  from 
Samuel  contains  nothing  worth  calling  a  sainted  prophet  from 
heaven  to  declare,  and  some  parts  of  it  are  unworthy  of  such 
an  origin.  It  contains  nothing  which  the  woman  might  not, 
under  the  circumstances,  have  told,  audit  is  most  easily  expli- 
cable when  regarded  as  apart  of  her  devices  to  awe  and  terrify 
the  King. 

We  need  not  linger  to  comment  on  the  events  that  followed 
tliis  interview,  or  on  the  overwhelming  effect  that  it  had  on 
Saul.  We  have  endeavored  to  give  a  more  satisfactory  solution 
of  the  difficulties  of  this  portion  of  Scripture  than  the  com- 
mon interpretation  affords  us,  and  we  apprehend  opposition 
only  from  those  who  scoff  at  the  Avords  Glairvoyaiice  and 
Mesmerism,  and  without  proper  examination  deny  all  their 
alleged  facts  and  wonders,  and  cry  them  down  as  delusion 
and  deviltry.  That  there  has  been  any.  amount  of  fraud 
practiced  by  the  devotees  of  Mesmerism  is  a  fact  abun- 
dantly well  known,  but  that  there  arc  also  numberless  facts, 
put  beyond  all  question  by  hundreds  of  careful  and  most 
inquisitive  witnesses — facts  as  mysterious  and  wondei  I, 
if  not  as  celebrated,  as  this  interview  of  Saul  with  the 
Witch  of  Endor — no  intelligent  person,  who  has  carefully  ex- 
amined tlie  subject,  can  deny,  indeed,  what  a  tremendous 
power  have  the  mysteries  of  divination  exerted  over  the 
human  heart    in  all  the  ages   past.     How  large   a  chapter  of 


54:1      SauVs  Interview  with  the  Witch  of  Endor.     [October, 

human  history  would  it  require  to  record  them  all !  To  af- 
firm that  these  are  all  the  immediate  works  of  the  devil,  and 
not  in  any  form  to  be  meddled  with  by  men,  is  in  one  sense 
to  surrender  to  the  Evil  One  and  pay  him  reverence.  If  the 
mysteries  in  question  lay  beyond  the  sphere  of  human  history 
and  experience,  the  Christian  might  indeed  be  content  to  let 
them  alone;  but  since  they  are  interwoven  with  human 
experience  in  every  age,  it  is  exceedingly  important  that 
their  real  nature  be  shown.  They  who.  cry  down  all 
attempts  to  explain  these  mysterious  phenomena  are  helping 
on  the  triumphs  of  the  devil.  The}"  say.  in  effect,  that  here  at 
lea-t  Satan  has  all  the  advantage,  and  we  must  sound  a  re- 
treat before  him.  But  if  we  show  that  these  mysteries  of 
witchcraft  have  their  explanation  in  peculiar  physiological 
and  psychological  phenomena  of  the  human  constitution,  which 
have  been  hitherto  misunderstood,  we  at  once  gain  a  noble 
triumph  over  our  ancient  foe,  and  drive  the  Prince  of  darkness 
from  a  throne  of  power  over  the  human  heart,  vdiere  he  has 
too  long  held  undisputed  empire. 


Ast.  FT.— WHITE'S  MASSACRE  OF  ST.  BARTU.OLOILE  YT. 

[Skcox))  Ann'.:.:-:.] 

In  a  former  article  we  examined  the  portion  of  this  history 
which  traces  the  growth  of  Protestantism  iu  France  down  to 
the  outbreak  of  the  civil  or  religious  wars.  The  next  division 
of  the  work  is  taken  up  with  a  faithful,  and,  in  the  main,  emi- 
nently judicious,  delineation  of  events  which  can  scarcely  be 
narrated  or  read  without  feelings  of  the  most  profound  sorrow. 
Ii  is  always  painful  to  see  a  Christian  man,  or  an  assemblage 
■of  men  that  make  profession  of  devotion  to  the  Christian  faith, 
resorting  to  the  Bword  to  settle  their  grievances.  But  it  is 
still  mere  a  ground  for  regret,  when  the  holy  names  of 
truth  and  religion  are  invoked  to  justify  recourse  to  the  most 
desperate  method  of  redress.  It  is  certain  that  nothing  was 
further  from   the  intention  of  the  French  reformers  than  to 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  545 

counsel  armed  resistance  to  oppression,  and  that,  so  far  as  their 
influence  was  felt,  it  was  consistently,  and  from  the  very  begin- 
ning, on  the  side  of  a  submission  to  the  constituted  authority, 
which  might  by  the  malevolent  be  mistaken  for  pusillanimity 
far  more  easily  than  construed  as  favorable  to  revolt.  True, 
the  moment  that  the  reformation  began  to  reach  entire  popula- 
tions, or  very  considerable  portions  of  the  community,  some 
symptoms  of  restiveness  under  the  most  galling  persecution 
began  to  manifest  themselves.  But  so  long  as  the  authority 
that  inflicted  the  penalties  of  the  terrible  code  for  the  punish- 
ment of  those  who  presumed  to  differ  from  the  religious  views 
countenanced  by  the  Crown  was  undoubtedly  legitimate — that . 
is,  while  it  was  a  king  that  chose  to  imbrue  his  hands  in  the 
blood  of  his  own  subjects,  and  not  a  subject  by  no  means  of  the 
most  exalted  rank,  or  the  most  intimately  concerned  in  the 
lasting  prosperity  of  the  kingdom,  who  had  fraudulently 
usurped  the  royal  prerogative  to  cloak  his  own  ambitious  de- 
signs— the  disturbances  were  rare  and  inconsiderable.  They 
scarcely  amounted  to  more  than  the  occasional  rescue  of  some 
martyr  for  the  faith  from  the  hands  of  the  guard  that  was  con- 
veying him  to  trial  before  blood-thirsty  judges,  or  to  an  inhuman 
execution.  Even  these  acts  of  insubordination  were  evidently 
the  fruits  of  the  inconsiderate  zeal  of  young  and  thoughtless 
persons,  whom  the  current  of  religious  fervor  which  surrounded 
them  had  swept  along  with  it,  but  whose  connection  with  the 
reformation  was  not  the  result  of  deep-seated  convictions,  and 
promised  little  to  be  either  strong  or  long-lived. 

But  the  ease  was  far  different  when,  first  under  Francis  II., 
and  then  under  Charles  IX.,  the  severities  exercised  against  the 
Huguenots  passed  out  of  the  realm  of  law  into  that  of  usurpation. 
It  was  not  now  a  Valois  that  instituted  tires  for  burning  heretics 
on  the  squares  of  Paris,  moved,  it  might  be  presumed,  by 
religious  zeal,  but  it  was  Charles  of  Lorraine,  who  wished  to 
further  his  own  private  ends,  perhaps  to  pave  his  way  to  the 
papal  chair,  by  sacrificing  countless  victims  to  the  all-devouring 
flames.  And  it  was  still  worse  when  a  triumvirate  of  powerful 
nobles  made  a  secret  compact  to  prevent  the  initiation  of  any 
plan  of  toleration  lor  Protestants;  or,  when  that  plan  had  been 
adopted  by  a  formal  xoio,  of  the  deputies  of  the  three  orders 
banded  themselves  to  rob  the  Reformers  of  all  its  benefits. 


546  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

In  point  of  fact,  the  option  between  peace  and  war  was 
scarcely  offered  to  the  Huguenots.  They  were  merely  called 
upon  to  decide  whether  they  would  allow  themselves  to  be 
butchered,  without  even  a  struggle  to  protect  their  lives  and 
those  of  their  wives  and  children,  or  whether  they  would  vin- 
dicate their  rights  as  Frenchmen  against  persecutors,  the  fore- 
most of  whom  were  foreigners  from  Lorraine  and  Italy.  Mr. 
White  observe- : 

It  may  be  said  that  if  ever  there  was  a  time  when  Christians 
were  justified  in  resorting  to  the  sword  it  was  the  present.  The 
laws  in  favor  of  the  Huguenots  were  constantly  and  systemati- 
cally broken.  The  massacre  at  Yassy  was  only  the  first  of  a  series 
•of  outrages  equally  barbarous.  At  Sens  in  Burgundy,  a  Huguenot 
having  insulted  a  Catholic  procession,  the  tocsin  was  rung,  and 
there  was  a  general  onslaught  upon  the  Reformed,  without  regard 
cither  to  age  or  sex.  The  bodies  of  the  victims,  stripped  and 
fastened  to  planks,  were  thrown  into  the  river  and  floated  down 
to  Paris,  twenty  leagues  distant.  The  fanatic  populace  destroyed 
every  thing,  even  rooting  up  the  vines  in  the  Calvinist  vineyards. 
For  three  days  the  hideous  carnival  of  murder  went  on,  and  ceased 
only  from  want  of  victims.* 

We  need  not  follow  the  writer  in  the  revolting  catalogue  of 
atrocities  committed  by  the  Roman  Catholic  populace  upon 
the  Protestants.  "  All  over  France,  from  the  Channel  to  the 
Mediterranean,  similar  ferocious  outbreaks  occurred."!  ^n 
every  case  the  occasion  or  the  pretext  that  served  to  call  forth 
the  violent  passions  of  the  people  was  so  trifling,  that  under 
ordinary  circumstances  it  would  have  been  utterly  inadequate 
to  produce  such,  wonderful  effects.  What,  then,  was  the  cause 
of  the  universal  fermentation  \  It  was  to  be  found  in  the  sedi- 
tious teachings  of  the  Romish  clergy,  exasperated  beyond  en- 
durance by  the  enactment  of  the  ''Edict  of  January,*-  which 
placed  the  reformers  under  the  protection  of  law,  and  recog- 
nized them  as  possessing  certain  rights  to  life,  property,  and 
religious  worship.  The  pulpits  resounded  with  denunciations 
of  the  patrons  of  heresy,  who  had  consented  to  a  compact  the 
most  pernicious  to  tine  religion,  it  was  asserted,  that  had  ever 
been  entered  into  by  Christian  princes.  Charles  IX.  did  not 
escape  obloquy.  But  it  was  his  mother  that  Mas  attacked  with 
the  least  reserve.  Bibles  long  unused  were  searched  for  the 
names  of  supporters  of  the  false  prophets  of  Baal.  Garrulous 
*  White,  p.  199.  f  lbi-L,  p.  200. 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  517 

Claude  Haton  tolls  us  that  for  a  long  time  there  was  not  a  eermon 
preached  in  which  Catharine  de  Medici  and  Antoine,  King  of 
Navarre,  did  not  figure  as  Jezebel  and  Ahab  ;  albeit  his  reader 
may  find  it  difficult  to  understand  to  what  "persecutions"  of 
the  orthodox  he  alludes  in  drawing  his  historical  parallel,  unless 
they  consisted  in  the  Roman  Catholics  not  enjoying  the  unchal- 
lenged privilege  of  persecuting  their  neighbor.*  The  same 
write]-,  himself  a  bigoted  priest,  quotes  with  evident  approba- 
tion the  sermon  of  a  Franciscan  friar,  Maitre  Barrier,  wliich 
may  serve  as  a  specimen  of  the  homiletics  of  the  period,  lie 
had  just  read  the  royal  ordinance  of  toleration  in  his  church 
of  the  Holy  Cross  in  Provius.     lie  said: 

Well  now,  gentlemen  of  Provius,  what  must  I  and  the  other 
preachers  of  France  do*?  Must  we  obey  this  order  ?  What  shall 
we  tell  you  '?  What  shall  we  preach  ?  The  Gospel.  Sir  Huguenot 
will  say.  And  pray,  saying  that  the  errors  of  Calvin,  of  Martin 
Luther,  of  Beza,  3'alot,  Peter  Martyr,  and  .other  preachers,  with 
their  erroneous  doctrine,  condemned  by  the  Church  a  thousand 
years  ago,  and  since  then  by  the  holy  (Ecumenical  Councils,  arc 
worthless  and  damnable,  is  not  this  preaching  the  Gospel?  Bid- 
ding you  beware  of  their  teaching,  bidding  you  refuse  to  listen 
to  them  or  read  their  books  ;  telling  you  that  they  only  seek  to 
stir  up  sedition,  murder,  and  robbery,  as  they  have  begun  to  do 
in  Paris  and  numberless  places  in  the  realm,  is  not  this  preaching 
the  Gospel  ?  But  some  one  may  say,  "  Pray,  friar,  what  are 
you  saying?  You  are  not  obeying  the  King's  edict;  you  are 
still  talking  of  Calvin  and  his  companions;  you  call  them  and 
those,  who  hold  their  sentiments  heretics  and  Huguenots  ;  you 
will  be  denounced  to  the  courts  of  justice,  you  will  be  thrown  into 
prison  ;  yes,  you  will  bo  hung  as  a  seditious  person."  I  answer, 
"T/iat  is  not  unlikely,  for  Ahab  and  Jezebel  put  to  death  the  proph- 
ets of  God  in  their  time,  and  gave  all  freedom  to  the  false 
prophets  of  Baal."  "Stop,  friar,  you  are  saving  too  much;  you 
will  be  hung."  "Very  well,  then  there  will  be  one  gray  friar 
hung!  Many  others  will  therefore  have  to  be  hung,  for  God  by 
his  Holy  Spirit  will  inspire  the  pillars  of  his  Church  to  uphold  to 

*  Memoires  do  Claudo  Haton,  vol.  i,  p.  211.  In  fact,  Catharine  seemed  fated  lo 
have  her  name  associated  with  tbat  of  the  most  infamous  queen  i  i  annals. 

A  Huguenot  poet,  writing  aftorthe  massacre,  with  more  show  ofjustiee,  if  must  be 
admitted,  institutes  a  studied  comparison  between  the  two,  wliich  terminates  with 
the  disadvantageous  ion,  tha  dogs  will  decline  to  touch  the  Modi- 

cean  queen's  !v!'!:iii>< ! 

".Mais  la  charogne  do  Cathl 

Sera  differente  ence  point, 

Carlos  chiens  no  la  vouldront  point."    Ibid.,  vol.  ii,  npp.,  p.  1110. 


548  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

the  end  the  edifice,  which  will  never  he  overthrown  until  the  end 
of  the  world,  whatever  blows  may  he  struck  at  it."  * 

It  is  not  surprising  that  such  constant  appeals  to  the  passions 
of  the  multitude  bore  speedy  fruit  in  bloody  massacres  of  all 
that  bore  the  name  of  Protestant.  After  chronicling  these 
popular  excesses,  Mr.  White  remarks : 

All  comment  on  these  things  would  he  superfluous.  Is  it  won- 
derful that  in  such  a  state  of  lawlessness  the. Reformed  nobles  and 
gentlemen  armed  in  self-defense?  With  indignant  eloquence, 
Agrippa  d'Aubigne  vindicates  the  rebellion  in  which  the  Hugue- 
nots sought  to  protect  themselves:  "So  long  as  the  adherents  of 
the  new  religion  wore  destroyed  merely  under  the  form  of  law 
they  submitted  themselves  to  the  slaughter,  and  never  raised  a 
hand  in  their  own  defense  against  those  injuries,  cruel  and  iniqui- 
tous as  they  were.  But  when  the  public  authorities  and  the 
magistracy,  divesting  themselves  of  the  venerable  aspect,  of  jus- 
tice, put  daggers  into  the  bands  of  the  people,  abandoning  every 
man  to  the  violence  of  his  neighbors,  and  when  public  massacres 
were  perpetrated  to  the  sound  of  the  drum  and  of  the  trumpet, 
who  could  forbid  the  unhappy  sufferers  to  oppose  hand  to  hand, 
ami  sword  to  swoid,  and  to  catch  the  contagion  of  a  righteous 
fury  from  a  fury  unrestrained  by  any  sense  of  justice.f 

The  Huguenots  have  so  often  been  condemned  for  resorting 
to  the  sword,  and  the  bloodshed  that  characterized  the  history 
of  the  latter  part  of  the  sixteenth  century  has  so  often  and  so 
unjustly  been  attributed  to  their  culpable  precipitancy,  that 
Mr.  White's  discussion  of  this  matter  (pp.  201-203)  is  worthy 
of  a  careful  consideration.  He  shows  conclusively  that  they 
were  forced  to  a  course  diametrically  opposed  to  the  theory  and 
practice  of  their  most  respected  religious  teacher  by  the  inex- 
orable logic  of  events.  Their  only  choice  "  lay  between  exter- 
mination, hypocritical  conformity,  or  rebellion.  They  were 
contending  against  intolerable  oppression  ;  the  laws  were  no 
protection  to  them  ;  and  in  such  circumstances  they  believed 
resistance  to  be  justifiable.  Why  should  they  apostatize  or  be 
burned  while  they  had  strength  to  wield  the  sword,  especially 
as  the  letter  of  the  law  was  in  their  favor? "% 

However  justifiable  the  course  of  the  Huguenots  in  taking 
up  arms  to  repel  their  assailants,  it  cannot  be  denied  that  the 
necessity  was  an  unhappy  one.     War  injured  them  externally 

*  M£moires  <\e  Chudc  Hani!:,  vol.  i,  p.  'J  12. 

\  White,  pp  200,  201.  J. Ibid.,  p.  202. 


1S69-.J  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  519 

and  internally.  It  alienated  many  whom  they  might  other- 
wise have  gained  over;  it  gave  their  adversaries  the  handle 
they  desired  to  represent  them  as  the  fomenters  of  disorder 
and  strife.  What  was  still  worse,  it  lowered  the  standard  of 
piety  in  their  own  ranks.  Their  campaign  began  with  a  dis- 
cipline wonderfully  pure  and  exact.  Gambling,  and  even  its 
implements  dice  and  cards,  disappeared.  Theft,  profanity. 
licentiousness,  were  unknown.  Prayer  and  singing  of  psalms 
pervaded  the  camp.  But  this  exemplary  goodness  was  as 
ephemeral  as  Admiral  Coligny  had,  from  the  beginning,  pre- 
dicted that  it  would  prove.  The  Huguenots  learned  to  plunder 
as  well  as  the  Papists.  Thirst  for  retaliation  begot  cruelty,  in 
some  eases  not  falling  much  behind  that  displayed  by  their 
opponents.  There  is,  however,  this  difference  to  be  noted,  that 
where;:.:  the  Protestant  ministers  were  always  foremost  in  de- 
nouncing and  opposing  not  only  all  acts  of  cruelty,  but  even 
the  iconoclasm  in  which  the  troops  were  wont  to  indulge,  the 
Romish  priest,  was  as  uniformly  the  instigator  of  the  inhuman 
passions  of  the  mob.  It  is  not  surprising,  therefore,  that  the 
most  frightful  atrocities  laid  to  the  charge  of  the  Protestant 
soldiers  were  almost  all  directed  against  priests  and  friars;  nor 
that  frequently  the  clerical  dress  or  tonsure  was  sufficient  to 
insure  immediate  execution  for  a  prisoner  that  fell  into  their 
hands. 

The  first  civil  war,  after  lasting  about  twelve  months,  came 
to  an  abrupt  termination  in  March,  1563.  The  event  which 
brought  about  the  unexpected  peace  of  Amboise  had  so  direct 
a  connection  with  the  history  of  the  causes  of  the  Massacre  of 
St.  Bartholomew  that,  it  deserves  special  mention  here.  Of 
the  four  principal  leaders  of  the  Roman  Catholic  faction,  three 
had  been  providentially  removed  within  a  few  months  from 
the  beginning  of  the  war.  Navarre  had  been  mortally  wounded 
at  the  siege  of  Rouen ;  St.  Andre  had  been  killed,  and  Mont- 
morency taken  prisoner  in  the  battle  of  Dreux.  Guise  alone 
remained  at  the  head  of  the  army,  and  was  on  the  point  of  cap- 
turing Orleans,  the  Protestant  stronghold,  when  his  life  was 
cut  short  by  the  pistol-shot  of  an  assassin.  The  misguided 
youth  who  committed  the  deed,  though  bold  in  action,  was 
craven  enough  after  his  arrest;  and,  when  put  to  the  torture, 
accused  Coliguy,  Soubize,  Deza,  and  others  of  having  instigated 

Fourth  Series,  Y<>;,.  XXI. — []'> 


550  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [Oct  " 

him.  Now  the  accusations  were,  in  part,  absurd — Bezn,  for 
instance,  had  never  even  scon  the  man,  so  far  as  lie  knew — and, 
in  part,  retracted  by  the  assassin  himself  as  soon  as  he  was  re- 
leased from  the  rack.  Indeed,  the  miserable  creature  was  so 
conscious  of  his  weakness,  that  he  warned  his  judge  that  when 
again  subjected  to  the  rack  he  would  doubtless  confess  any 
thing-he  was  desired  to.  His  admissions,  however,  were  so 
acceptable  to  the  Court  that  his  retraction  was  unheeded. 
Catharine  de  Medici  was  eager  to  weaken  Coligny's  influence, 
and  nothing  could  serve  her  purpose  better  than  to  have  him 
believed  guilty.  In  vain  did  Coligny  write  and  pray  that 
the  murderer  should  be  reserved,  in  order  that  he  might  be  able 
to  confront  him.  The  Queen  was  resolved  to  preclude  the 
possibility  of  any  such  judicial  purgation,  and  the  very  day 
before,  she  made  peace  with  the  Huguenots  caused  Poltrot  to 
be  executed  with  every  refinement  of  cruelty.  The  alleged 
complicity  of  Coligny  in  the  murder  of  Francis  of  Guise  became 
the  occasion  o{  a  lasting  feud  between  the  Ohatillons  and  the 
Lorraine  family — a  feud  which  Henry  of  Guise  pretended  to 
avenge  nine  years  later  on  the  bloody  Sabbath  of  August. 

Bad  Coligny  contented  himself  with  a  simple  denial,  his 
well  known  character  for  veracity  would  probably  have  over- 
borne the  accusations  of  his  enemies.  His  excess  of  frankness 
led  him  to  make  a  defense  so  outspoken  and  manly  in  its  dec- 
larations that  it  has  been  easily  distorted  and  misrepresented 
by  those  who  have  wished  to  prove  him  guilty,  while  many  of 
a  more  fair  turn  of  mind  seem  to  be  unable  to  appreciate  its 
merit.     Miss  Freer  writes  : 

The  character  of  the  Admiral,  in  the  opinion  of  his  contempo- 
raries, never  recovered  from  the  stain  of  his  having  been  privy  to 
the  assassination  of  the  Due  de  Guise.  If, in  reality,  the  Admiral 
had  been  endue. 1  with  that  chivalrous  probity  and  unsullied  honor 
with  which  lie  has  been  invested^  he  ought' to  have  repulsed  the 
suspicion  of  so  atrocious  a  deed  with  the  indignant  energy  which 
his  position  and  repute  as  a  Christian  man  and  a  cavalier  demand- 
ed. But  what  was  Coligny's  conduct  at  this  juncture  in  repelling 
the  suspicion — the  source  of  the  future,  misfortunes  which  b<  fell 
him— when,  as  a  loyal  subject  and  a  valiant  knight,  France 
awaited  his  vindi  i  the  charge?     In  reply  to  the  memo- 

rials presented  by  the  princes  of  Guise  to  King  Charles,  to  Cath- 
arine, to  the  Parliaments  of  Paris,  Bordeaux,  and  Toulouse — 
memorials  which  were  dispersed  not  alone  over  the  realm  but 
throughout    neighboring  States,  and  in  which  the  Admiral 


1869.3  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  551 

plainly  accused  of  connivance  in  the  foul  assassination,  Coligny 
addressed  three  letters  to  Catharine  do  Medici,  and  published 
two  memorials,  in  which  not  only  does  he  not  deny  categorically 
the  charges  preferred  against  him,  hut  nnblushingly  proceeds  to 
prove  that,  whoever  might  hare  been  the  instigator  of  the  crime, 
lie  deserved  well  from  God  and  the  King.* 

Even  Mr.  White,  who  has  weighed  the  whole  transaction,  in 
a  calmer  spirit,  remarks : 

It  must  be  acknowledged  that  the  Admiral's  conduct  and  lan- 
guage were  not  altogether  satisfactory.  .  .  .  This  leaves  no  doubt 
that  Coligny  assented,  if  he  did  not  consent  to  the  crime,  lie 
was  not  unwilling  to  profit  by  it,  though  he  would  do  nothing  to 
further  it.  This  may  diminish  the  lofty  moral -pedestal  vn  which 
sonic-  writers  haA  e  placed  the  Protestant  hero;  but  be  was  a  man, 
and  had  all  a  man's  failings,  though  lie  may  have  controlled  them 
by  his  religious  principles.  Nor  was  assassination  considered  at 
all  cOwardly  or  disgraceful  in  those  days  ;  not  more  so  than  killing 
a  man  in  a  due)  was  until  very  recently  among  us.f 

Now  both,  of  these  writers  do  great  injustice  to  a  man  whom. 
while  we  cannot  claim  for  him  a  perfection  beyond  that  which 
is  human,  was  far  removed-  above  the  age  and  court  in  which 
he  lived.  Ooligny's  statements  Lear  the  unmistakable  impress 
of  truth.  They  were  freely  made,  in  spite  of  the  opposition  of 
his  friends,  who  feared,  with  good  reason,  that,  the  enemies  of 
his  house  and  of  his  faith  would  do  their  utmost  to  distort  and 
pervert  them.  lie  chose  voluntarily  to  enter  into  minute  par- 
ticulars, which  a  guilty  man  would  have  suppressed,  that  he 
might  be  aide  to  protest,  "in  the  sight  of  God  and  his  angels," 
that  he  had  given  no  instructions  to  Poltrot  other  than  those  he 
indicated  in  his  letters.  To  doubt  his  unequivocal  assertions, 
vouched  for  by  an  unimpeachable  reputation  for  truthfulness, 
is  to  set  a  premium  on  insincerity  and  duplicity.  It  is  an  ex- 
cess of  unfairness  to  employ  his  manly  and  fearless  admissions 
as  a  convenient  basis  for  advancing  further  charges  which  he 
indignantly  repudiates.  From  the  Admiral's  clear  exposition 
of  all  the  circumstances,  it  is  established :  first,  that  Poltrot, 
who  had  come  to  him  recommended  by  Soubize,  was  employed 
by  him  in  the  capacity  of  a  spy  in  the  camp  of  the  Duke  of 
Guise,  at  that  time  pressing  the  siege  of  Orleans;  secondly, 

*Henry  311.,  His  Conrt  and  Times,  by  Martha  Walker  Freer.    Throe  voli 

Vol.  i,  p.  D7.     Loi  Ion:   1  658. 
f  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew,  pp.  ?:22,  223. 


552  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

that  Coligny  paid  hiin  first  twenty,  and  afterward  one  hun- 
dred, gold  crowns  to  defray  his  expense?,  and  particularly  to 
enable  him  to  purchase  a  horse,  and  held  out  to  him  the  ex- 
pectation of  still  greater  rewards  if  he  brought  him  important 
intelligence,  especially  respecting  a  question  about  which  the  Hu- 
guenot general  was  extremely  solicitous,  namely,  whether  Guise 
would  pursue  him  in  his  expedition  into  Normandy ;  thirdly ^ 
that  Coligny  had  from  time  to  time  been  apprized  of  plans  or 
threats  to  assassinate  the  Duke  of  Guise,  but  had  strongly  dis- 
suaded all  persons  from  engaging  in  them,  although  consider- 
ing Guise  as  the  most  prominent  enemy  of  God  and  his  cause 
in  France;  fourthly,  that  a  few  months  before  the  siege  of 
Orleans,  he  had.  received  intelligence  of  plots  instigated  by 
Guise  and  St.  Andre  against  the  lives  of  the  Prince  of  Conde, 
his  brother  d'Andelot,  and  himself;  fifthly,  thai,  from  this  time 
forth,  while  taking  no  part  in  retaliatory  plots,  he  deemed  him- 
self no  longer  bound  to  interfere  by  his  remonstrances  in  order 
to  shield  so  treacherous  an  enemy;  sixthly,  that  Poltrot,  so  far 
from  having  been  instigated  by  Coligny  to  the  murder  of  Guise, 
had  repeatedly,  and  in  the  most  imprudent  manner,  announced 
his  design  to  Soubize  and  others,  long  before  being  introduced 
to  Coligny;  seventhly^  that  although  he  spoke  of  such  a  thing 
to  the  Admiral,  the  latter  paid  no  attention  to  it,  believing  it 
to  be  an  idle  boast,  and  considering  Poltrot  to  be  very  un likely 
to  intend  undertaking,  or  to  be  able  to  execute,  so  hazardous  a 
deed :  nor  was  this  strange,  for  such  threats  of  personal  ven- 
geance upon  the  leaders  of  the  enemy  are  common  in  every 
war;  never,  perhaps,  more  so  than  in  our  own  late  war. 

Such  seem  to  be  the  simple  facts  of  the  case  so  far  as 
Coligny  is  concerned.  He  neither  counseled  nor  abetted  the 
assassination.  At  the  same  time  he  regarded  the  death  of  the 
Roman  Catholic  general,  the  "Butcher  of  Yassy,"  and  the 
proximate  cause  of  the  war,  as  a  blessing  to  France,  to  the 
Church,  he  v,- os  seeking  to  destroy,  and  to  the  Chatillon  family, 
which  he  pursued  with  envenomed  hatred.  "  Put  do  not  imag- 
ine," he  wrote  to  Catharine  after  clearing  hims<  If  from  any  par- 
ticipation in  the  i  tion,  "  that  I  say  this  because  of  any 
regret  I  feel  for  the  death  of  the  Duke  of  Guise,  which  event  1 
esteem  the  greatest  blessing  that  could  have  befallen  this  king- 
dom, the  Church  of  God,  and  more  especially  myself  and  al 


1869.1  Massacre  of  St  Bartholomew.  553 

my  house  ; "  and  lie  added,  that  if  improved,  it  might  be  the 
means  of  securing  rest  to  the  kingdom.  TTe  cannot  agree-  with 
Mr.  White  that  "this  leaves  no  doubt  that  Coligny  assented, 
if  he  did  not  consent  to  the  crime,"  and  "  that  he  was  not  un- 
willing to  profit  by  it,'"  except  so  far  as  Christian  men  have 
ever  been  glad  to  profit  by  the  death  of  eminent  persecutors 
of  the  Church. 

The  belief  that  the  massacre  of  August  24,  1572,  had  long 
been  determined  upon,  and  even  its  minute  details  elaborated 
with  scrupulous  exactness,  although  rejected  at  the  time  by 
many  of  those  who  were  best  informed,  was  generally  accepted 
as  an  incontrovertible  fact.  It  was  commonly  supposed  that 
the  plan  of  the  wholesale  destruction  of  the  Protestants  was 
first  suggested  by  the  Duke  of  Alva  at  the  celebrated  confer- 
ence of  Bayonne,  in  the  early  part  of  the  summer  of  1565, 
and  that  the  scheme  was  there  agreed  upon  by  Catharine  de 
Medici  and  her  fellow-conspirators.  Indeed,  it  is  strange  that 
a  persuasion  of  the  formation  of  a  compact  to  this  effect  should 
have  spread  almost  instantly  among  both  Protestants  and 
Roman  Catholics  upon  receipt  of  intelligence  that  such  an 
interview  had  been  held  b}r  Charles  IX.  and  his  mother  on  the. 
one  side,  and  Isabella,  Queen  of  Spain  and  daughter  of  Catha- 
rine, and  the  Duke  of  Alva,  on  the  other.  In  spite  of  the 
efforts  of  Granvellc  and  others  to  persuade  the  public  that  the 
meeting  had  no  ulterior  design,  and  that  its  sole  object  was  to 
afford  a  mother  and  daughter  who  had,  for  five  or  six  years, 
been  separated,  the  opportunity  to  see  each  other  again.  o\\ 
perhaps,  all  the  more  on  account  of  their  protestation.-,  the 
majority  oi'  men  persisted  in  being  convinced  of  the  very 
reverse.  A  characteristic  saying  of  Alva,  for  which  the  best 
proofs  of  authenticity  were  claimed,  was  soon  current  and  in 
all  mouths.  "For  one  incident  of  the  conference,"  says  Mr. 
White,  "we  are  indebted  to  Prince  Henry  of  Xavarre,  who 
was  allowed  to  visit  Bayonne  because,  said  Philip,  'he  is  still 
a  child,  whom  Cod  will  not  allow  to  remain  iu  ignorance.' 
One  thi}  when  the  Duke  of  Alva  and  Catharine  were  convers- 
ing together,  the  former,  putting  Tarquin's  gesture  into  words, 
advised  her  to  get  rid  of  ihe  Iluguenot  nobles,  after  which  all 
would  be  easy  work.  '  Ten  thousand  frogs,' he  said, '  arc  not 
worth  the  head  of  one  salmon.'     Henry  overheard  him.  and 


55i  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

the  words  struck  him  bo  much  that  he  repeated  them  to 
Soffrey  do  Calignon,  one  of  his  attendants,  by  whom  they 
were  transmitted  to  the  Queen  of  Navarre.     They  soon  became 

known  to  the  Huguenot  leaders,  and  aroused  a  suspicion 
which  it  would  have  been  well  for  them  had  they  never  laid 
aside.  The  words  produced  a  deep  impression  upon  Catha- 
rine, and  more  than  once  she  tried  to  act  upon  them,  until  at 
last  she  succeeded  but  too  well."*    . 

Now,  however,  since  the  secret  papers  of  the  prime  actors 
in  this  important  period  of  history  have  been  rescued  from  the 
repositories  wliich  so  long  sheltered  them  from  the  inspection 
of  the  people,  we  have  something  Letter  than  mere  surmise  or 
hearsay  testimony  upon  which  to  ground  our  belief.  In  the 
correspondence  of  the  Cardinal  of  Granvelle,  published  in  nine 
large  volumes  by  order  of  the  French  Government,  (the  last 
volume  in  1S52,)  there  is  a  detailed  account  of  the  conference, 
in  letters  written  from  Bayonne  by  the  Duke  of  Alva,  between 
the  fifteenth  of  June  and  the  fourth  of  July.  1565;  besides 
numerous  allusions  to  its  character  in  the  letters  of  Granvelle 
and  others.  Mr.  White  sums  up  the  whole  matter  in  these 
words:  "  It  is  certain  that  nothing  was  settled  at  the  Bayonne 
meeting,  Catharine  being  steadfast  in  her  purpose  to  maintain 
her  power  by  holding  the  balance  between  the  two  hostile 
parties.  'She  has  promised  to  do  wonders,' wrote  Granvelle, 
(August  20,  1505,)  'but  will  do  nothing  of  any  service.'  "  f 

The  documents  undoubtedly  prove  that  the  meeting  at 
Bayonne  was  not  a  mere  interview  for  the  purpose  of  gratify- 
ing the  affection  of  a  mother  and  her  daughter,  and  cementing 
more  closely  the  friendship  between  the  French  and  Spanish 
courts.  Besides  the  gorgeous  display  of  costly  dress,  bi  - 
the  splendid  pageants  and  games,  the  storming  of  enchanted 
castles,  and  tournaments  between  the  supporters  of  the  ve- 
sportive  claims  of  Virtue  and  Lovc,J  there  were  less  ostenta- 
tion.-, but  more  real  passages  at  anus  in  which  neither  love  nor 
virtue  were  very  much  displayed.  Alva  had  come  commis- 
sioned to  p  '  trine  and  her  son  to  adopt  more  decisive 
measures  fortlie  eradication  of  heresy.  Before  assailing  his 
royal  hosts,  he  thoughl  it  appropriate  to  sound  the  dispo  : 
of  the  swarm  of  French  nobles  that  accompanied  them;  and 

*  White,  i>.  265.  i  Ibid.,  p.  25G.  \  See  White,  ]  p.  250-252. 


I860.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  555 

lie  Lad  reason  to  be  satisfied  with  the  devotion  which  some 
of  the  highest  rank  and  largest  influence  professed  to  entertain 
for  his  master,  the  Most  Catholic  King.  The  weak  Cardinal 
of  Guise,  younger,  brother  of  the  Cardinal  of  Lorraine,  whose 
convivial  proclivities  earned  for  him  the  title,  strange  to 
chnrchly  ears,  of  ,%  le  Cardinal  des  Bouteilles"  was  overcome 
with  emotion,  and  implored  Philip,  by  the  Jove  of  God,  to  pity 
a  kingdom  whose  religion  was  ti^i  going  to  ruin.  Montpensier 
declared  himself  ready  to  he  rent  in  pieces  in  his  behalf, 
protesting  that  in  case  this  were  done  the  name  of  "Philip" 
would  be  found  written  on  his  heart.  The  barbarous  Blaise 
de  Montluc,  after  being  duly  Haltered  by  the  embassador, 
avowed  sentiments  after  Alva's  own  mind,  and  pointed  to  his 
former  relentless  cruelty  as  proof  that  he  was  opposed  to  the 
display  of  false  humanity.  But  with  Charles  JX.  and  his 
mother  the  wily  Duke's  suggestions  of  the  necessity  for  the 
employment  of  violent  measures  against  the  Huguenots  met 
with  but  a  cold  reception.  To  the  bare  insinuation  that  God 
was  reserving  him  for  the  execution  of  a  good  work  in  the 
punishment  of  offenses  against  religion  in  France  Charles 
promptly  replied:  aO,  to  take  up  arms  does  not  suit  me;  I 
have  no  disposition  to  effect  the  destruction  of  my  kingdom, 
which  was  begun  in  the  past  wars."  The  Duke  perceiving, 
as  he  noted  to  his  master,  that  the  young  King  was  but 
repeating  a  lesson  that  had  been  taught  him  by  others,  con- 
temptuously dismissed  the  ! 

The.  matter  was  treated  at  far  greater  length  with  Catharine 
de  Medici,  and  the  Duke  of  Alva's  letters  present  her  in  a 
very  different  light  on  this  occasion  from  that  in  which 
contemporaries,  who  were  not  well  informed  respecting  the 
occurrences  at  the  Bayonne  conference,  have  painted  her. 
Instead  of  welcoming,  we  find  her  repelling  Alva's  suggestions. 
The  topic  of  persecution,  in  fact,  is  one  that  she  mani  '  ' . 
desires  to  avoid  touching  upon  at  alL  the  had  plenty  of  bitter 
reproaches  for  her  daughter,  whom  she  accused  of  having 
allowed  herself  to  become  a  thorough  Spaniard,  and  was  not 
backward  in  telling  Philip's  embassador  that  the  distrust  his 
master  evinced   of  Charles   IX.   ami   herself  would  not  im- 

*  Cartas  que  el  Duqtie  do  AJba  scrivW  a  uu  Ufagestad,  Papiers  d'Etat  du  Card. 
ol.  i: .  }\  291.    See  a!>u  White,  ]>.  ~2i>C 


550  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew,  [October, 

probably  ripen  into  open  war.  But  the  moment  that  the 
delicate  subject  of  the  treatment  of  religious  dissensions  in 
France  was  broached — the  subject  above  all  others  near  to 
Philip's  heart,  if  his  protestations  are  to  be  taken  of  any 
account — the  Queen  Mother  displaj-ed  such  tact  in  parrying 
every  thrust,  thai  she  earned  the  admiration  of  one  who  was 
himself  no  novice  in  the  art  of  dissimulation.  Her  circum- 
spection, he  declared,  he  had  never  seen  equaled.*  She 
would  make  no  con  She  maintained  that  the  Ediet 

of  Toleration — referring  to  the  Edict  of  January  as  modified  by 
the  Pacification  of  Amboise — was  working  well.  She  asserted 
that  the  royal  proclamations  were  received  with  respect  and 
obeyed.  "When  Alva  and  her  daughter  attacked  her  for 
retaining  so  notorious  a  Huguenot  at  the  head  of  the  adminis- 
tration as  the  Chancellor  Michel  de  FHopital,  she  calmly 
replied  that  she  did  nol  consider  him  a  bad  Catholic,  "Then 
you  arc  the  only  person  in  France,"  bluntly  responded  the 
grim  old  Duke,  "  that  is  of  that  opinion."  Xot  only  did 
Catharine  take  the  most  hopeful  view  of  the  present  situation, 
but  she  greatly  shocked  the  orthodox  Alva  by  announcing 
that,  instead  of  securing  the  unqualified  acceptance  of  the 
decrees  of  the  Council  of  Trent,  she  intended  convening  a 
conference  of  good  prelates  and  learned  men  to  settle  matters 
of  dispute.  It  was  evident  she  had  not  the  fear  of  the  repeti- 
tion of  the  Colloquy  of  Poissy  before  her  eye-.  The  Spaniard 
came  to  the  conclusion  that  Catharines  sole  design  was  the 
an  of  a   recourse  to  salutary  rigor.\    What  that  salu- 

tary rigor  was  Alva  only  hinted;  but,  though  lie  declined  to 
tell  Catharine,  in  her  manifestly  indisposed  frame  of  mind,  pre- 
cisely what  Philip  would  have  her  do,  for  fear  of  committing 
his  councils  to  one  of  whom  he  felt  \uy  uncertain,  he  permits 
us  to  see  all  thai  is  essential  in  the  advice  of  some  "  good  " 
Papists,  which  ho  reports  to  his  master  with  every  mark  oi% 
approval.  [J  •■■■-  in  the  first  place  to  banish  all  Protestant 
ministers  from  the  kingdom,  and  prohibit  utterly  ;.-,.; 
oftlu    Ref  n      I  reli   '  The  provincial  governors  could  be 

reli  d  upon   to  execute  this  part  oi  rk.     .IJut  b. 

•  Carl 

f  Pareeeme  que  qi 

■      •  p.  318. 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  557 

this,  it  would  be  necessary  to  seize  a  few  of  the  leaders  of  the 
Huguenots,  and  to  cut  off  their  heads.  Five  or  six,  it  was 
suggested,  would  be  all  the  victims  required."  The  plan  was, 
in  tact,  essentially  the  same  as  that  with  which  Alva  himself, 

a  year  or  two  later,  undertook  to  reduce  the  Netherlands  to 
submission  to  Spanish  tyranny  and  the  Papal  Church. 
Treacherous  arrests  of  the  nobles  most  suspected  of  entertain- 
ing heretical  views — arrests  which  could  scarcely  have  been 
confined  within  such  narrow  numerical  limits  as  were  sug- 
gested—with a  "  Blood  Council"  to  complete  the  work,  or 
with  a  massacre  in  which  the  proprieties  of  judicial  investiga- 
tion might  be  less  nicely  observed — such  was  the  scheme  which 
would  have  corresponded  exactly  with  the  views  of  Philip  and 
his  minister. 

So  far,  then,  was  the  general  belief,  adopted  until  lately  by 
the  great  majority  of  historians,  that  Catharine  framed  at  the 
Bayonne  conference,  and  with  Alva's  assistance,  a  plan  for 
the  extermination  of  the  Protestants  by  a  massacre  such  as 
was  put  into  effect  on  St.  Bartholomew's  Day  1572-  from 
being  correct,  that,  on  the  contrary,  she  refused,  with  a 
peremptory  manner  that  disgusted  the  Spanish  fanatics,  every 
proposition  that  looked  to  violence.  That  we  have  not  read 
the  correspondence  of  Aha  incorrectly,  and  that  no  letter 
containing  the  mythical  consent  of  Catharine  ever  reached 
Philip,  is  proved  by  the  tone  of  the  letters  which  passed 
between  the  great  agents  in  the  work  of  persecution  in  the 
Spanish  Netherlands  ;  among  others,  from  that  of  Granvelle 
already  referred  to,  from  which  Mr.  White  quotes  a  few- 
sentences.  The  diplomatists  were  all  agreed  that  Catharine's 
plan,  if  persisted  in,  would  entail  the  ruin  of  religion,  and 
the  overthrow  of  her  son's  throne. f 

Two  years  after  the  Bayonne  conference  the  war  between 
the  Court  and  the  Huguenot.-  broke  out  afresh.  Systematically 
oppressed,  and  denied,  by  interpretative  declarations,  the  rights 
which  solemn  edicts  secured  them,  the  Huguenot--  had  ample 
grounds  of  discontent.  "Still,"  as  Mr.  White  remarks,  "the 
actual  rupture  might  have  been  deferred  but  for  circumstances 
connected  with   the  state  of  the  Netherlands."     The  passage 


vol.  ix,  p.  4 SI. 


*  Cartas,  etc,  vol.  ix,  pp. 

296,  297. 

f  Papicrs  d'Etat  du  Card. 

di  Granve 

55S  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

of  the  Duke  of  Alva  with  an  army  of  ten  thousand  picked 
veterans,  along  the  eastern  frontiers  of  France,  from  Genoa 
through  Burgundy  and  Lorraine  to  Flanders,  alarmed  the 
Government,  as  well  as  the  Protestants.  "Catharine,  who 
distrusted  Philip,  thought  it  prudent  to  watch  their  march, 
and  for  that  purpose  collected  all  the  forces  she  could  muster 
to  form  an  army  of  observation.  These  being  insufficient  for 
the  purpose,  Conde  and  the  Admiral  advised  the  enrollment 
of  six  thousand  Swiss  mercenaries.  The  Queen,  delighted 
at  such  an  opportunity  of  raising  soldiers  without  offending 
the  sensibility  of  the  Huguenots,  promptly  acted  upon  the 
advice."*  But  the  Protestants  soon  had  reason  to  regret  the 
step.  The  command  of  the  troops  was  denied  to  Conde,  who 
was  threatened  with  vengeance  by  young  Henry  of  Anjou, 
Catharine's  favorite  son,  if  he  ventured  to  renew  his  applica- 
tion ;  and  the  Swiss,  instead  of  being  disbanded  as  soon  as 
Alva  reached  Brussels,  were  ordered  to  approach  Paris.  The 
Huguenot  leaders  thought  they  saw  unmistakable  proofs  that 
this  force  was  retained  to  be  employed  in  overwhelming 
then?.  After  a  series  of  consultations,  in  which  Coligny  ap- 
pears as  the  opponenl  o'f  rash  attempts  and  his  brother  d'An- 
delot  as  the  advocate  of  decisive  and  prompt  measures,  they 
found  "  no  alternative  left  them  but  to  draw  the  sword."  "  It 
was  an  unfortunate  decision,"  says  Mr.  "White,  "  and  not  justi- 
fied by  the  real  facts.  But  the  mistake  committed  by  the 
Huguenot  chiefs  is  patent  enough,  and  they  were  thought 
by  their  contemporaries  to  have  acted  very  wisely.  Languet 
writes  from  Strasburg  on  the  twenty-second  of  October  that  the 
Huguenot  chiefs  knew  for  certain  that  the  Pope  and  the  other 
princes  who  had  conspired  against  the  true  religion  had 
determined,  as  soon  as  it  was  put  down  in  Lower  Germany, 
to  do  the  same  in  France,  and  for  that  purpose  the  King 
had  raised  a  strong  force  of  Swiss."  f  Whether  right  or 
wrong  in  their  surmises,  however,  the  Huguenots  failed  in 
the  step  with  winch  they  commenced  the  Mar.  They  had 
hoped  t<>  wresl  the  ICiug  from  the  counselors  by  whom  he 
was  surrounde  '.,  to  briug  them  to  justice,  and  to  replace  them 
by  men  who  would  belter  cousnlt  for  the  interests  of  France. 

anew,  p.  2GG. 
f  Ibid./pp.  258,  2C9. 


18G9.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  559 

But  the  royal  court  escaped  them  ;  and,  what  was  worse,  they 
incurred  the  indignation  of  Charles  and  the  hatred  of  Catha- 
rine, who  never  forgave  them  the  audacity  of  having  seemed 

to  attempt  to  take  her  prisoner. 

Three  years  of  bloody  warfare  now  ensued,  interrupted 
only  by  the  truce  between  the  Bccond  and  third  religious 
wars,  which  lias  been  called  the  "  Bud  Little  Peace."  Defeated 
more  frequently  than  victorious,  and  particularly  unfortunate 
in  the  two  great  engagements  of  Jarnae  and  Moncontour, 
the  Huguenots  had  the  faculty  of  rapidly  renewing  their 
strength,  and  never  appearing  more  formidable  than  just  after 
the  reverses  which  their  enemies  had  hoped  would  prove 
fatal.  The  last  achievement  of  the  third  war  was  a  masterly 
march  by  Admiral  Coligny,  who,  starting  first  almost  as  a 
fugitive,  after  a  brilliant  victory  of  the  Roman  Catholics,  swept 
up  the  valley  of  the  Garonne,  through  lower  Languedoc,  up 
the  valley  of  the  Rhone,  and  through  Burgundy  almosi  to  the 
gates  of  Paris,  bringing  Catharine's  dilatory  negotiation-  for 
peace  to  a  speedy  conclusion.  So  favorable  were  the  terms 
now  granted  that  many,  among  others  the  anonymous  author 
of  the  "  Tocsin  contre  les  Alassacrcnrs," '""  have  considered 
the  peace  as  forming  merely  a  part  of  the  nefarious  conspiracy 
which  culminated  two  years  later  in  open  butchery.  Mr. 
White  discusses  this  important  point  at  considerable  length  : 

The  color  given  to  the  next  two  years  of  the  reign  of  Charles 
IX.  depends  much  upon  the  view  we  take  of  the  Peace  of  St. 
Germains.  Was  the  court  sincere,  or  only  playing  a  part  to 
entice  the  Huguenots  into  a  trap,  and  so  get  rid  of  them  a!  <>nc 
blow?  This  is  the  opinion  of  many,  and  particularly  of  Davila, 
who  says  positively  that  the  peace  was  a  snare.  But  he  is 
occasionally  too  subtle:  he  belongs  to  that  class  of  historians 
who  think  that  kings  and  statesmen  regulate  their  policy  by 
1  schemes  of  far-sighted  calculation,  instead  of  living,  as  it 
were,  from  hand  to  mouth.  The  imj  revu,  to  use  an  apt  French 
word,  plays  a  much  m<  re  important  part  in  human  affairs  than 
some  historians  are  willing  to  believe.  The  Treaty  of  St.  Ger- 
mains—and  Ave  have  Walsingham's  express  testimony  to  that 
effect — was  the  work  of  the  Politicians,  [the  party  which  en' 
deavored  to  steer  between  the  Papists  and  the  Huguenots,]  all 

•The  title  of  the  ition  i.-.   "Le  '  reura  et 

Autlieura  des  confusions  en  France,     Ad  lo8  Princes  Chreatiena.    A 

Reims,  15  ('..>." 


560  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

good  Catholic-,  like  Cosse,  Damville,  nud  Montmorency.  Wal- 
singham adds  that  the  King  had  sharply  rebuked  the  mutinous 
Parisians,  and  told  them  that  ho  meant  to  have  the  treaty  "  duly 
observed."  He  further  explains  whyCharles  would  have  desired 
]•  ■  :  "  His  own  disposition,  necessity,  pleasure,  nrisliking  witli 
certain  of  the  council  and  favoring  of  others."  Walsingham 
already  saw  the  small  cloud  arising  that  would  soon  overshadow 
France:  "Monsieur  (Anjou)  can  hardly  digest  to  live  in  the 
degree  eta  subject,  having  already  the  reputation  of  a  king." 

Languet's  testimony  is  equally  decisive  as  to  the  pacific 
disposition  of  Charles  IX.  Contanni  speaks  doubtfully  about  the 
treaty,  although  lie  says,  "Peace  was  the  aim  and  desire  of  the 
King  and  Queen."  indeed,  it  was  not  Catharine's  policy  t" 
crush  the  Huguenots  utterly:  she  needed  them  as  a  counterpoii  3 
to  the  Guises,  who,  though  at  this  time  rather  out  of  favor  at 
court,  were,  perhaps,  all  the  more  popular  among   the  fanatic 

It  must  he  further  home  in  mind,  that,  at  this  turning-point 
of  Catharine's  policy,  not  only  the  Pope  was  not  consulted,  hut 
the  Court,  in  making  peace,  acted  in  direct  opposition  to  his  re- 
monstrances. In  January  Pius  V.  strongly  advised  a  continu- 
ance of  the  war,  and  when  he  heard  of  the  Treaty  of  St.  Germains, 
he  wrote  to  the  Cardinals  of  Lorraine  and  Bourbon,  expn  • 
his  '-fears  that  God  would  inflict  a  judgment  on  the  King  and 
all  who  counseled  and  took  part  in  the  infamous  negotiations. 
We  cannot  refrain  from  tears  as  we  think  how  deplorable  the 
peace  is  to  all  good  men;  how  full  of  danger,  find  what  a  source 
of  bitter  regret."  it  would  have  been  very  easy  to  quiet  the 
holy  father  by  telling  him  that  the  treaty*  was  a  snare;  hut 
nothing  of  the  kind  was  done;  and,  on  tile  contrary,  the  Bang 
and  his  mother  both  represented  to  him  the  necessity  of  peace. 
Pius  replied  in  angry  tones,  and  the  Court  made  answer  that  the 
King  was  master  in  ids  own  dominions  to  do  as  he  pleased.  In  a 
somewhat  similar  manner  Spain  tried  to  thwart  the  negotiations; 
Phil'])  If.  even  ottered  to  send  Charles  a  force  of  three  thousand 
horse  and  six  thousand  foot,  provided  he  would  engage  never  to 
make  peace  with  the  heretic  rebels.  But  this  attempt  to  prolong 
the  v/ar  also  failed,  and  we  learn  from  Walsingham  s  dispatches 
that  a  great  coolness  sprang  up  between  the  two  Courts.* 

The  intense  hostility  of  Rome  and  Spain  to  the  conclusion 
of  the  pea      '  tainly  one  of  the  strongest  points  in  the 

proof.     Both  had  been  firm  allies  during  the  recent  wars,  and 
.had  sent  material  assistance.     No  one  would  have  welc< 
a.  treacherous   treaty  with  greater  avidity.      There  are  diffi- 
culties surrounding  the  matter  which  may,  perhaps,  nev< 
fully  cleared  up;   hut,  as  Mr.  White  remarks; 

•:■■■'.    .!''■'  mew,  i>;>.  315,  .10. 


1869.]  ■  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  561 

If  we  assume  that   the  Government    was  sincere,  every  thing 
becomes  clear  for  the  next  two  years;  if  we  adopl  th 
opinion,  the  course  of  events  up  to  the  eve  o\'  the  massacre  is  an 
inextricable  maze.     True,  it  is  impossible  to  say  whether  Ci 
rine  accepted  the  treaty  without  any  i  '  '  ■■  ,  ;   i 

reservation— for  she  accepted   every  thing,  and  was   sincere  in 
nothing  except  her  master-passion,  to  govern  France.     For  this, 
she  not  only  played  one  party  against  the  other,  but  habitu 
dallied  witfc  opposing  schemes,  intriguing  now  ou  this  side,  now 
on  that,  deceiving  and  betraying  all.* 

Scarcely  less  important  in  an  historical  point  of  view  is  the 
question  of  the  sincerity  of  the  French  Court  in  the  pro- 
posed marriage.-  between  Henry  of  Anjou  and  Queen  Eliza- 
beth, and  between  Henry  of  '.Navarre  and  Marj 
Mr.  White  decidedly  inclines  to  believe  that  the  suspi 
which  subsequent  events  have  thrown  upon  them  are  un- 
merited. ".Respecting  the  former,  it  may  be  observed  that 
Catharine,  acting  under  the  influence  of  resentment  against 
Spain,  because  of  the  indignity  which  Philip  II.  had  put  upon 
her  by  persuading  Sel  I  to  decline  the  French 

matrimonial  alliance,  was  disp<  sed  to  draw  closer  to 
not  to  speak  of  her  desire  to  secure  so  bright  a  jewel  as  the 
English  crown  for  her  favorite  sun.     Charles  IX.  | 
evidence  of  being  equally  anxious  for  an   ari  ul  that 

would   free  him    from    the  presence  in  France  of  a    brother 
whose   military    reputation   he   envied,    and    whoso  influence 
over   his  mother  he  dreaded.     The  case  was  different  with 
Henry  of  Anjou  himself.     Independently  of  his  relucta 
leave  France— a  country  that  furnished  him  sin  mities 

for  gayety  that  all  other  i  •      resembled  in 

desert— his  intimate  association  with  the  ultra  .  tholics 

made  him  averse  to  marry  a  Protestant  queen   and   b 
ruler   of  a   country   where   the   Protestant    i 
exclusive  toleration.     Besides— and  this  is  one  of  Uh 
proofs  that  the  Queen  mother  and  the  King  were  :' 
the  Guises  >  concilably  opposed  to  the  plan.     The, 

no  stone   unturned   to  prevent 
parity  of  the  ages  of  the  parties.     They  nol  ■ 
Elizabeth  as  extremely  ugly,  but  persua 

*  Massacre  of  St.  13  irthol  «  lew,  p 


562  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

moral  character  was  not  above  reproach.*    In  his  eagernc 
prevent  the  marriage,  the  Cardinal  of  Lorraine,  il  is  said,  even 
promised  him,   on   the  part  of  the  French  clergy,  a  pr< 
of  fonr  hundred  thousand  crowns.f    Surrounded  by  6uch  in- 
fluences^ and  flattered  as  the  sole  hope  of  the  Roman  Cat] 
party,  it  is  n<  '         nge  that  at  the  very  moment  when  he  was 
declaring  to  Elizab    V    embassadoi  his  intense  admiration 
the  charms  of  his  mistress,  "being,  as  even  her  very  enemies 
say,  the  rarest  creature  that  was  in  Europe  these  fv<  hum 
years;' X  he  was  meditating  the  best  means  of  retiring  grace- 
fully from  the  competition  for  the  hand  of  the  "  Virgin  Queen." 
But  that  Catharine,  was  sincerely  desirous  of  the  conclusion  of 
the  matrimonial  alliance  is  evident,  not  only  from  the  threats 
she  uttered  in  her  private  correspondence  with  the  French 
embassador  at  London  against  the  persons  who  might  have 
dissuaded  Anjou,  but  also  from  her  prompt  substitution  of  her 
youngest  son.  Alengon,  as  a  suitor  for  Elizabeth's  hand  and 
crown. 

It  is  no  less  evident  that  the  Navarrese  mai   '  ■  pro- 

posed as  a  means  of  restoring  concord  between  the  two  great 
factions  within  the  borders  of  France.     Again  I 
of  the  extreme  Roman  Catholics  is  proof 
not  intended  as  a  trap  to  take  ihc   }'., 

at  least,  that  even  the  Roman  Catholic  leaders  nizani 

of  no  such  scheme,  and  did.  not  even  suspect  its  possibility. 

It  (the  marriage)  was  naturally  opposed  by  th  »t,  as 

some  write,  because  the  Duke  a  pin  I  to  Margaret's  band,  for  he 
had  been  marrii  d  some  months  to  Catharine  of  Cloves,  tb<   i 
of  Prince  Poivien,  but  because  il  would  strengt 
and  make  the  II  influence  predominant.     Thi   nuncio 

the  Spanish  emb  the  match;  but  ( 

not  to  be  divert<  d  from  hi-;  purp 

*  See  Catharine  do  ! 
tlic  Eu  rlish  Court,  J  1571.    I 

(Pari       -       '    10.)  vol  vii,  p.  179. 

|  Soldan, 
buch,  1 

J  Letter  i  May 

eador,  p.  101. 

!i  Wl  ite,  p.  340.    C 
"Ti.o  most  eminent  and  faithful  of  i 
condition  of  i  .. 


1869.3  Massacre  of  St.  BartMemew.  50" 

We  agree  with  Mr.  White  in  thinking,  notwithstanding 
tome  suspicions  circumstances,  that  Charles  IX.  was  in  earnest 
in  his  deliberations  with  Coligny  during  those  critical  months 
when  the  Flemish  war  was  discussed.    Perhap  chari- 

table when  he  repr<   ents  Charlc  \  and 

in  his  weakness  leaning  on  Coligny,  whom  he  had  learn< 
trust  as  a  child  trusts  his  father ;"'  while  nn  g  the 

true  reason,  for  the  respect  which  even  so  corrupt  a  buy  could 
not  help  entertaining  for  the  Huguenot  chief: 

There  was  much  in  the  Admiral  to  attract  the  I  was  a 

man  of  probity  aud  h<  n  r,  actuated  bj  tives, 

but  by  the  purest  desire  for  the  greatn<  is  of  Franca  Cli 
had  never  possessed  such  a  friend  befo] 

How  far  back,  according  to  Mr.  White,  was  the  ma 
planned?     With  Eaumer,  Ranke,  and  Soldan,  (whose  admi- 
rable monograph,  " Frarikreich  und  die  Baxth  ■  ?hl" 
is  by  far  the  most  complete  and  satisfactory  di                of  the 
subject,)  he  supposes  that  even  by  Catharine  and  h  r  e  m  Anjon, 
upon  whom  the  guilt  chiefly  rests,  the  deteri                to  murder 
Coligny  was  adopted  but  a  few  days  before  the  attom] 
Maurevel,  on  Friday  the  22d  of  August.     Had  the  arqu< 
shot  of  this  famous  assassin  accomplished  its  work,  it  is  the 
positive  statement  of  the  Papal  nuncio  Sal\  iati,  thai  the  whole- 
sale butchery  of  the  Protestants  would  not  have  been  und     - 
taken.f     However  much  Catharine  may  have  been  incli 
in  the  height  of  her  indignation  againsl  Philip  EL,  to  join  with 
England  in  taking  advantage  of  so  fair  an 
revolt  of  the  Xetherlands  afforded  for  humbling  the  Spain 
however  much  she  may  have  humored  Char!  inti- 
macy with  Admiral  Coligny— her  mind  changed   compl 
when  she  began  to  perceive  that  the  King  was  li 
emancipated  from  the  tutelage  in  which  she  had  alwaj 
tained  him;  that  the  influence  i                                          I  lom- 
ised  to  be  replaci  d  by  that  vl'  the  ■  lli:it 
France  was  on  the  eve  of  bring-  involved  in  : 

powerful  prince  of  Christendom,  with  bul  an  unc 
support  from  the  Engli  h  Queen.     After  the  unfor! 

*  Whil     ■  '  ' 
i  Si    I1 


.5G4  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

of  Gcnlis -with  the  French  detachment  that  had  started  to  re- 
inforce the  "Beggars"  of  the  Low  Countries,  and  whtfn  ever}' 
thing  boded  an  immediate  outbreak  of  hostilities,  th 
of  the  Queen  Mother  became  in  her  own  eyes  more  critical. 

She  was  too  wise  to  oppose  her  son's  warlike  humor  openly,  but 
Bhe  so  far  shook  hi  i  m  as  to  have  the  whole  subjeei  brought 

before  the  Council.    She  was  averse  to  the  war  on  man)  groi 
but  principally  because  she  fell   assured  thai  if  Coligny  carried 
on  a  successful  campaign  his  influence  would  quite  superse  le 
her  own. 

Shortly  after  this  Charles, 

that,  ho  might  enjoy  a  little  quiet,  suddenly  started  for 
pipeau,  a  pleasant  hunting-lodge,  intending  to  remain  there  until 
the  eve  of  his  sister's  marriage.     Meanwhile  bad   ne     • 
the  French  Court;    Catharine  discovered  that  Queen  Elizabeth 
was  playing  her  false,  and  while  pretending  zeal  for  an  alliance 
against  Spain,  "was  actually  treating  with  that  power.     D<    I 
and  Fene'nii  both  wrote  from  private  information  thai  she  had 
been  advised  to  recall  her  troops  from  Flanders  and  not  quarrel 
with  Spain.     "  Whereupon,"  write.-.;  YValsingbam  on  the  10th  Au- 
gust, "the  Queen  Mother  fell  into  such  fear  thai    tl 
must  necessarily  fail  without  the  :  id  of  Eng]  The  i 

was  untrue.,  and  was  probably  a  mere  invention  of  soi  le  < 
traitors  in  the  English  Council.     But  it  frightened  Catharine,  end 
she  determined  to  make  one  more  attempl  to  r< 
dency  over  the  King.     She  hurried  to  Montpipean  with  such  im- 
petuous haste  thai  two  of  her  horses  fell  dead  on  the  road.    With 
tears  in  her  eye--,  she  accused  Charles  of  in  a  i  lother 

"who  had  sacrificed  herself  for  his  welfare,  and  incurred  everj 
risk  for  his  advantage."     "  5Tou  hide  yourself  from  me,"  shi 
tinned,  "and  take  counsel  with  my  enemies.     v>>";  are  about  to 
plunge  your  kingdom  into  a  war  w  ith  Spain,  and  y  t  England,  in 
whose  alliance  y<  a  tru  ted,  is  false  to  you.     Alone  yon  ci 
resist  so  powerful  an  enemy.     You  will  only  make  France  a 
to  the  Huguenots,  who  desire  the  subversion  of  the  ki 
their  pwnbeneiit.    If  you  will  no  longer  be  guided  by  i 
suffer' mc  to  return  to  mj  native  co\  Dtry,  that  1 
Buch  disgrace."-! 

The  exact  date  of  this  interview,  in  which  a  motl 
were  successful,  i-  not  known  ;  but  since,  as  Mr.  Whil 

*  Tbe  quolati 
"Where  ip  n  such  of  his  Com 
Mother  in  such  n  fear 
..•,  :  i  : 

wise  was  v<  ry  rcsolni 

t  White,  p.  363. 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  505 

the  English  embassador  refers  to  it  Id  his  letter  of  the  10th  of 
August,  it  probably  took  place  in  the  first  week  of  that  month. 
That  Charles  listened  toColigny  rather  than  to  his  mother 
u  was  the  Admiral's  death-warrant." 

"What  do  yon  learn  in  your  long  conversations  with  the  Ad- 
miral?" asked  Catharine  one  clay.  '  <:i  learn,"  lie  n  ,"; 
1  have  no  greater  enemy  than  my  mother."     She  saw  berp 
slipping  from  her,  and  Iter  son  Anjou,  her  beloved,  i 
son,  in  danger;  for  she  knew  how  violent  Charles  coul 
he  was  once  aroused.     And  all  depended  upon  thi    life  • 
man!     And  when  in  those  days  did  any  body,  especially  a  i 
ian  man  or  woman,  allow  a  single  life  to  stand  between  them  and 
their  desire?    Colignj  must  be  got  rid  of ;  then  the  Quei   i  ! 
would  recover  her  influence;  then  there  would  b  i  f  this 

perplexing  Flemish  business;  and  with  Henry  of  Navarre,  the 
head  of  the  Huguenot  party,  married  to  her  daughter,  there  would 
be  no  cause  to  fear  a  revival  of  internal  disturban 

Mr.  White  regards  as  of  doubtful  authenticity  the  narrative 
of  the  secret  history  of  the  preliminaries  of  the  massacre  which 
Anion  is  said  to  have  given  to  one  of  the  French  men  who 
followed  him  into  Poland,  and  which  has  been  published  in  an 
appendix  to  the  Memoirs  of  Villeroy.f     But  the  statements  it 
contains  agree  so  well  with  the  information  we  get  from  other 
sources,  that  we  cannot  avoid  coming  to  the  conclusion  that 
the  attempt  on  the  life  of  Coligny  was  first  resolv<  d  upon  ;..-  a 
method  of  self-preservation  by  Catharine  and  Anjou,  and  was 
afterward  communicated  to  the  Duchess  of  Nemours. 
latter,  who  was  the  well  known  Anne  d'Este,  daughter  of  the 
excellent  Renee  of  France,  and  granddaughter  of  Louis  XII., 
was  also  the  widow  of  the  murdered  Francis  of  Gui 
hated  Coligny,  as  the  sup]  igator  of  hi    i  .  with 

a  relentless  malignity,  in  which  her  sou   Henry,  the  pi 
Duke  of  Guise,  fully  participated.     Ii  was  the  DucIk  •  of  \<  - 
mours  and  young  Guise  that,  earned  Maurevel,  alrei  Ijai    ex 
perienced  hand   in  the  work  of  murder,  to  be  placed  in.  the 

♦  ATliite,  pp.  ';r,\,  3 

•!  Pi   "    ■  •'■  Colli  clion  ol  Memoii     si  xliv,  pp.  496  510.     Con     ' 
;  ■  .  .  x,  ]>.  ::i 5.     Prof.  Soldan 

that  tl 
by  Capefigu     :  im    ' 

I  hi    co  i  (         rine  ol  Ihe  chai 

even 
Foubth  Semes,  Vol.  XXI. 


500  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  [October, 

house  of  Canon  Yillemur,  formerly  tutor  to  Guise,  there  to 
watch  for  the  coming  of  the  Admiral. 

Contrary  to  the  confident  expectation  of  the  coi 
Haurevel's  shot  was  ill  directed.     Coligny  was  wounded,  not 
killed.     The  King,  ignorant  of  the  high  source  of  the  plot,  but 
suspecting    Guise,    uttered    fearful   imprecations    ag  the 

authors. 

All  tliis  time  the  Queen  Mother  and  Anjou  were  in  a  dn 
state  of  agitation.     The  Move  had  failed,  and  if  the  victim  recov- 
ered frorohis  wounds,  their  participation  in  the  plol  could  do 
concealed.    "Our  notable  enterprise  having  miscarried, 
Duke,  "my  mother  and  myself  had  ample  matter  i  i  and 

uneasiness  during  the  greater  part  of  the  day."     '1  hen    ■  :  ■  still 
.hope,  ll>r  the  bullets  might  be  poisoned,  or  the  wounds  mortal.* 

lint  this  hope  was   le  tined  to  be  disappointed.     Sat 
came,  and  with  it  the  announcement  thai   the  ,  pro- 

nounced Coligny  on  the  road  to  recovery.     What  was  w< 
the  King  was  more  suspicious  than  ever,  since  Ids  interview 
with  the  wounded  Huguenot  leader  ;  and  Catharine  and  Anjou 
had  been  thrown  into  fresh  consternation  by  the  vi< 
mands  of  the  Protestant  lords  for  the  punisbnu 
nity  done  them  during  the  nuptial  festivities  to  which  they  had 
•come,  trusting  to  the  monarch's  word  for  their  protection.     It 
was  then  that,  convinced— to  use  Anjon's  own  words  -of  the 
impracticability  of  employing  ruse  and  cunning  any  further, 
Catharine  and  her  younger  son  resolved  ivj  ,       action,  and 

.determined  to  bring  the  King  to  consent  to  Coligny's  death. 
Mr.  White  has  described  in  an  interesting  manner  the  thril 
story  of  the  artful  harangue  in  which  the  Floi 
excited  apprehensions  of  a  Iluguenol  ri  '       in  the  mind  o 
weak  hod.  and  broughl  him  to  consent  to  the  deed  thai  del 
France  with,  blood,  and  idled  his  own  heart  with 
morse,  if,  indeed,  it  did  not  cut  short  hi  Mr.  White's 

recital  of  the  death  of  Coligny  and  |   and 

succeeding  atrocities  is  temperate,  and  free  from  all  exaj 
lion.     He  accepts,!  as  wo  believe  - 

that  Charles  IX.  shot  at  the  fleeing  !'  with  jNi  arquc- 

buse  from  hie  window  in  the  Louvre,  in  -, 
that  has  recently  been  expressed  in  regard  to  the  uukingl 
inhuman  act. 

♦  Massacre  of  St.  Bartliol*  mew,  p  \  '   ;:    PI 


1S09J  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  507 

The  work  of  butchery  was  no  less  horrible  in  its  revelations 
of  human  baseness  in  the  provinces  than  in  the  capital.     Hap- 
pily, the  times  also  developed  some  singular  and  brilliant  excep- 
tions.    We   shall   conclude   our  examination  of  Mr.  White's 
work  with  reference  to  two  of  the  alleged  instances  of  honora- 
ble insubordination  to  the  King's  bloody  orders.     The  reply 
which  the  author  places   in    the   mouth  of  James  Hcnrj 
Bishop  of  Lisieux,  is  unfortunately  to  all  appearances  destitute 
of  an  historical  foundation.*     Far  from  being  a  prelate  of  the 
stamp  which  this  reply  supposes,  Hennuyer  was  a  pliant  cour- 
tier, who  knew  no  rule  of  action  but  the  will  of  those  at  w 
hands  he  looked   for  honors  and  emolument.     Independent  of 
this  proof,  we  have  the  almost  perfect  certainty  that  the  I  !i 
instead  of  being  in  his  diocese,  was  with  the  Court  at  the  time 
of  the  occurrence  of  the  massacre. f 

It  is  more  pleasant  to  be  able  to  establish  the  authenticity 
of  an  equally  noble  rejoinder,  which  has  been  somewhat 
credited.  ^Jr.  White  says:  "Viscount  Orte  or  Orthez,  Gov- 
ernor of  Bayonne,  wrote  a  letter,  which  one  would  fain  believe 
to  be  true,  in  spite  of  the  discredit  recently  thrown  npon  it : 
'  Sire,  I  have  communicated  your  Majesty's  commands  to  the 
faithful  inhabitants  and  garrison  of  this  city.  1  have  found 
among  them  many  good  citizens  and  brave  soldiers,  but  not  one 
executioner.'  [Bourreau — hangman.]  One  thing  is  certain, 
that  the  Huguenots  in  Bayonne  were  saved." %  And  in  n 
foot-note:  "  Capefigue  says  the  letter  is  a  forgery  of  the  i  - 
Louis  XIV.,  but  it  is  published  by  Agrippa  d'Aubigne  in  161S. 
Adiram  d'Aspremonte,  Viscount  d'Orte,  (as  he  is  sometimes 
called,)  was  a  cruel  man,  cruel  to  both  parlies.     Even  Charles 

*The  style  of  the  prel  ■:.  ted  '.  lieutenant  il 

resemblance  to  tbat  i  -  .       "  Kb,  no,  si     I 

always  oppos  i  the  si  cb  an  order,  towhi      I 

Pastor  <  b  of  Lisieux,  and  the  people  you  are  coram 

floc-ic.     . 
which  . 

nevertheless  return,  ;       [will  not  gh 
White,  p.  -155. 

\  M.  L.  D.  Pau  wo  think,  cleo  II 

of  Hennuyer,  as  '•■• 
read  before  th 
ciety,  vol  vi.  (1  (1862,)  p.  125,  etc. 

\  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew,  p.  -155. 


56S  Massacre  of  St  Bartholomew.  [October, 

IX.  was  forced  to  write  to  hiin  in  15Y4  and  tell  hiin  to  be 
more  moderate.''     The  story,  as  Mr.  "White  indicate  . 
the  authority  of  Agrippa  d'Aubigne,  and  it  is  worthy  of  obser- 
vation, that,  at  the  same  I  Line  that  he  records  this  magnanimous 
action,  lie  mentions  that  the  Viscount  was  "  homme  violent 
autres  ehoscsP*    D'Aubigue    was    eyidcntly  well    informed 
respecting  the  circumstauces,  and  he  narrates   an   event,  in 
a  subsequent,   portion  of  his  work,  which  serves  as   a  most 
conclusive  incidental  corroboration  of  the  truth  of  thisanei 
Some  time  subsequent  to  the  massacre  (in  157?)  D'Aub 
himself  was  in  command  of  a  body  of  Huguenot  troops,  which, 
near  Sables,  (in  the  present  department  of  Les  Landes,)  fell  in 
with  a  Roman  Catholic  detachment  which  was  conducting  to 
Bordeaux  three  noble  ladies  condemned  to  be  beheaded.    / 
a  very  brief  combat  the  Roman  Catholics  were  compellc 
surrender,  whereupon  it  was  discovered  that  about  a  score  were 
lieht-horsemen  of  the  Viscount  of  Orthez,  while  about  as  many 
more  were  men  raised   at  Bayonne  and  Pax.     The  warfar 
those  days  was  cruel    and  sanguinary.     Captain  and  soldiers 
recalled  the  infamous  massacre  of  the  Protestants  in  thepri 
of  Dax.     It  scarcely  needed  the  order  of  D'Aubign6  to  n 
bloody  reprisals  upon  twenty-two  soldiers  who  came  from  that 
city.     On  the  other  hand,  all  the  Bayonncse  were  curie 
collected,  their  arms  and  their  }mv<cr-  were  restored,  and,  after 
their  wounds  had  been  carefully  dressed  at  la  Harie,they  were 
dismissed  with  a  friendly  message  to  the  s  '  their  Gov- 

ernor, that  his  men   had  seen  the  different  treatment  whi 
"  soldiers  "  and  "executioners"  Qourrcaux)  received.     "T 
adds  the  historian,  "  was  in  allusion  to  the  answer  ti 
had  made  to  the  King  when  he  received  the  i  '■'  the 

massacre,  a3  we  have  said    in  its  place."     Within   a  wi 
trumpeter  came  from   Bayonne,  with  scarfs  and  embroidered 
handkerchiefs  for  all  a  tokeu  of  the  V 

Orthez's   appreciation.!     It    is   evident    tl 
Interwoven  with  the  history  of  the  period  cannol  bi   the  inven- 
tion of  a  ':  manly  am 

*  FTist  iii  •    Univ<  IS;     Vol.   ii.   p.    28. 

Book  I.  c 

f  Histoire  Univ.  du  ."■ mi  d'Aubi  ■>.'  vi  I   V.  \  p.   291,  2!  2, 
sion  iu  tho  Biilletra  d 
pp.  13-15j  116,  etc.,  and  vol.  xii,  p.  240,  etc. 


1869.]  Massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew.  509 

Governor  of  Bayonne,  although  it  may  hove   received   b< 
coloring  from  the  medium  through  which  it  has  been  I 
mitted  to  us,  is  substantially  accurate. 

We  are  glad  to  pee,  that  while  Mr.  White  finds  no  reason  to 
believe  that  cither  the  Pope  or  the  King  of  Spain  was  privy  to 
the  massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew,  he  is  careful  to  show  that  the 
fearful  catastrophe  was  only  the  legitimate  fruit  of  tb 
teachings  of  Pius  V.  and  of  .the  Very  Catholic  King  respecting 
the  necessity  of  exterminating  heresy;  and  that,  on  learning 
of  the  murder  of  tens  of  thousands  of  innocent  men  and  I 
less  women  and  children,  the  successor  of  Pius  vied  with  Philip 
and  Alva  in  expressions  of  joy.     With  the  two  latter,  it  is  true 
worldly  wisdom   had  perhaps  as  much  weight  as  devotion  to 
the  Roman  Church.     Philip  was  forever  freed  of  the  di 
of  an  alliance  between  France  and  the  Protestant  Powers. 

MuUis  minat  .-,  •     '      f  /    ' . 

Neither  Elizabeth  nor  William  of  Orange  could  ever  gi 
without  a  shudder  the  hand  that  reeked  with  the  blood  of  tl  e 
guiltless. 


Akt.  v.— religion  and  the  reign  of  terror. 

Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror;  or,  the  Church  d     inj    tin 
Prepared  from  the  French  of  M.  EtmoxD  de  i  i 
trois  premiers  siecles  de  l'Egli      I     .     i  urn  ;"  " Je'sus-Chrisl 
son  oeuvre;"  "La  Pay9  de  I  Bvangilo;"  and  editor  •        i..  !:   i 
By  Rev.  John  P.  LAcitnix,  A.M.     12rao.,  pp.  4.16.    N  v    Y.  .    :C 
han.     Cincinnati:  Hitchcock  &  Walden.     1869. 

Great  events  are  slowly  adjusted  to  their  final  place  in  history. 

There  are  so  many  complications  to  unravel,  so  many*: 

tions  of  prejudice  and  pas  ion  to  correct,  so  many  simulations 

to  unmask,  thai  time  is  indispensable  to  the  ; 

up  of  truth.     In   nothing,  however,  is  the  divinity   of  I 

more  strikingly  evinced  than  in  the  certainty  with  which,  Iioa  - 

ever  hindered,  ii  comes  to  eventual  recognition.     Prom  wl 

ever  bonda<  e  truth  musl  break,  however  intricate  lb 

is  compelled  to  travel,  or  formidable  the  fo<     il    tuusl  -mite 

down,  it  marches  surclj  on  to  that  ultimate  complcl 

lypse  in  whose  light  history  records  its  irreversible  decision. 


570  Religion  and  the  Eeign  of  Terror.        [October, 

The  instances  are  few  in  which  truth  has  been  s1 
asserting  itself  than  in  that  of  the  first  French   Revo] 
We  stand  removed  from  thai  event  three  quarters  of  a  century. 
It  has  been  deeply  studied  j  views,  accepted  once,  have  been 
altered  or  reversed;  but  the  judgment  is  not  yet  p 
which  truth  will  finally  confirm.     Peculiar  causes  : 
spired  to  prevent  the  truth  respecting  that  event  from  going 
into  history.     The  French  themselves  were  unprepared  . 
to  estimate  it  justly.     The  grand  movement,  whosi 
thrilled  them  to  ecstasy,  had  borne  them  in  it  i  progre  -  into 
seas  of  trouble.     While  the  waves  were  yet  tumultuo 
Icon  took  control;  and  when, with  armies  and  police 
Lis  single,  arbitrary  will,  he  had  tranqnilized  the  agitation,  it 
was  natural  that  the  masses,  weary  of  the  chaos  of  so  many 
years,  were  more  disposed  to  applaud  his  achievement  r 
question  his  assumptions.      Hence,  dazzled  by  the  glory  or 
awed  by  the  power  of  the  Consulate  and  Empire,  whoever  of 
them  might  take  in  hand  to  tell  the  story  of  the  R 
would  manifestly  he  disqualified  to  do  it  fairly.     When  Water- 
loo restored  the  old  regime^  the  likelihood  was  even  less  that  a 
Revolution  whose  guillotine  had  so  rudely  cut  the  Bourbon  line 
would  be  justly  weighed  or  truthfully  described.     Nap  '. 
ideas,  made  supreme  again   by  the  coup  d'etat  of  I 
hardly  more  auspicious  for  the  truth  of  history.     Among  othei 
peoples  fain     -  was  at  first  even  less  to  be  expected.     F. 
where  in  Europe  the  privileged  classes  heard,  in  the  tl 
that  convulsion,  the  mutterings  of  doom  for  them;  and  while 
every-where  the  unprivileged  and  oppressed  hailed  i1 
as  the  dawn  of  their  deliverance,  the}  1  by 

the  madness  into  which  it  fell  that  their  admiration  chai 
to  horror  and  execration.     A  movement,  therefore,  in  its  na- 
ture so  alarming  to  one  class,  and  in  its  i 
every  other,  was  little  likely  to  receive  impartii  ;  at 

the  hand-  of  an}  .     With  the  lapse  of  ,  '     . 

but  truth  fared  ;..  badly  :.  bi  lore.  A  brood  «  f  !:;.-:<.,•;.  went 
abroad  as  -  'I1'-'  former  were  in  i 

sin-e ;  in  particular,  intensely  cul 

posed,  indeed,  the  fury  of  the  Revolution,  bu!  did  uol  rcsl  till 
much  of  all  that  was  deare  I  in  the  struggle  v..  chained  to  the 
wheels  of  liis  despotic  car.     Now  here,  if  not  always,  trutl 


1SG0.]  Rdigion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.  571 

in  the  middle.     Assuredly  the  Revolution  was  not  all  good 
was  if  wholly  evil.     If  infidel  and  atheistic  lies  were  there,  the 
dearest  truths  concerning  God  and  man  were  also  there.     1 1 
that  dreadful  floor  blaspheming  demons  plied  the  flail,  there 
were  threshers,  too,  in  whose  esteem  the  good  seed  of  truth  and 
right  were  dearer  than  their  lives.     To  this  view  opinioi 
been   tending-.     Investigati  i  '  mate,  has 

silling  out  the  grain.    Tl     |     tdulum  of  history,  unduly  swayed 
at  first  by  prejudice  and  passion,  then  carried  by  rebound  to 
the  extreme  of  fulsome  adulation,  is  settling  to  the 
ultimate  repose. 

Xo  other  aspect  of  the  Revolution  has  had  to  wai 
for  just  appreciation  as  the  religious.     The    picture   of  that 
tumult  which  still  flo  I  the  common  mind  is,  we  aj 

hend,  that  of  a  people  suddenly  inspired  with  love  of  li 
throwing  themselv(  s  into  1 '  if  infidelity  ;  and  then,  a-  if 

possessed  of  demons,  perpetrating  in  the  name  unut- 

terable crimes;  insanely  merry  even  while  the  death-ax  wi 
manding  its  daily  feast  of  blood  ;  prating  of  freedom  while  the 
furies  of  disorder  were  trampling  out  its  life  ;  but  a  pi 
into  which,  if  religion  come  at  all,  it  is  religii 
speut,  playing  no  worthy  part  in  the  terrible  drama,  but  ;, 
ing,  in  one  universal  apostasy,  to  the  pressure  of  that  ;- 
and  atheistic  storm.     Besides  the  scandal  to  i  h  a 

picture  is  untrue.     In  fact  the  great   truths  which 
upon  the  spiritual  were  at  no  period  of  tl 
unfelt.     The  sorest  perplexities  and  saddest  failures  ol 
olution  were  largely  the  result  of  the  ill-consid 
early   took,   and  the  policy   it  afterward 
questions  of  religion.     It-  treatment  of  I 
ture  of  the  State,  and  ii-  mad  ei  u'iin 

the  shackles  of  human  law.  awakened  that  resie 
turn,  provoked  those  storms  of  infi 

wrecked  so  many  of  its  hopi  -.     And  eveu  when  nthi  ism,  in  the 
horn-  of  delirious  triumph,  wa  •  d<    lari 
his  worship  done  away,  the  inc:    ' 
wa^  heard  ]  »f  God  and 

the  soul  wit!   a  '  un" 

belief  to  unsay  their  vaunting  lies,  and  cease  from   their  dia 
gUStin"   mummeries.      In  a  word,  i  to   the  wild 


572  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.       [Octo 

spirit  of  the  Revolution  a  resistance  so  persistent  and  invincible 
as  religion;  and  yet  if  has  been  the  fashion  either  wholly  to 
ignore,  or  at  most  to  treat  with   inadequate   appreciatioi 
connection  with  the  struggh  . 

The  book  whose  title  stands  at  the  head  of  this  | 
to  6npply  this  defect.     Its  author  reviews  the  history  of  the 
Revolution  for  a  single  purpose — to  ascertain  "''■  rela- 

tions of  Church  and  State  during  its  progress,  and  to  <  sti 
in  what  degree  a  false  adjustment  of  these  relati<       ii       c  out- 
set, and  the  evil    c  mt  on  that  mistake,  c 
aspirations  of  his  countrymen  to  become  free  and  self-govern- 
ing to  encounter  defeat.     There  was  assurance  in  advance  that 
he  would  do  it  well.     Distinguished  rank  among  the  writers 
of  his  country,  enlightened  views  on  the  social  questions  of  the 
age,  taken  in  connection  with  extensive  studies  in  the  line  of 
Church  History,  designated  him  as  peculiarly  qualified  for  this 
particular  work.     It  is  little  to  say  that  the  result  equals  the 
promise.     He  has  produced  a  book  not  merely  of  deep  and 
thrilling  interest,  but  replete  with  lessons,  whose  importance  it 
were  impossible  to  overstate.     It  cannot  fail  to  concili 
ers  that  candor  is  so  manifest  on  i  v<  ■    |  .  ge.    While  tl 
avows,  and  in  every  way  evinces,  the  warmest  sympathy  with 
the  Revolution,  he  deals  in  no  measured  condemnation  of  its 
crimes;   while  he  writes  in  vindication  of  religion, 
fairly  gleams  with  indignation  when  the  sycophantic  pliancy  of 
clerical  demagogues  and  the  policies  and  plots  of  politic         '  - 
siarchs  are  passing  in  review.     In  fact,  thorough  r< 
dent  study,  accurate  deduction,  and  ! 

viction,  are  so  manifest  throughout  the  book,  thai  we  ai       irricd 
along  in  it<  perusal   hardly  feeling  that  w 
we  wish,  to  dissent  from  any  of  its  conch    '  The  work, 

moreover,  is  extremely  opportune.     At  a  tim<  land 

king  peacefully  to  readjust  Church  and  S'atc.  1 
a  portion  of  her  realm     when  Spain  i;  grappli  I  the 

questions  involved  hi  the  French  Revolution — whei 
civil   and   rein  ious  libert 
every-wh*  re,  i;   is  more  than  timehj 

dence— that  the  rock  on  which  the  i  nch  liberty  was 

wrecked  should  be  j  uintcd  out,  and  the  li 
made  available  for  others. 


1869.]  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.  573 

The  opening  of  the  book  is  quite  Homeric.     There  is  no 
liminary  nnfolding  of  the  plot;  no  time  is  spent;  in  depic 
the  oppressions  out  of  which  the  Revolution  grew.     Assuming 
familiarity  with  these,  the  author  hurries  at  once  into  the  n  ' 
of  the  tumult.     For  readers  of  his  own  nation  this  perhaps  is 
no  defect ;  it  may  not  he  a  serious  one  for  ol 
ment  has  made  its  origin  widely  und  ft  is  a  tru 

partial  statement,  ascribed  to  Madame  de  Stael,  that  the  1 ' 
lution  was  "au  event  which  came  forth  out  of  the  womb  • 
centuries."    In  the  sense  that  its  provocations  were  the 
of  centuries  this  is  certainly  true.      Assumptions  an 
coming  down  from  ages  acquiescent  in  the  masterhood  ofl 
were  that  which  woke  at  last  the  spirit  of  revolt.     The  y  ' 
sought  to  throw  off  was  of  mediaeval  imposition.     The  cl 
it  rose  to  break  were  the  forging  of  feudal  times,     [n  fclii 
gard  its  genesis  was  truly  of  the  ages.     But  while  wo  i 
allow  that  its  potential  causes  were  in  the  arrogations  and  mis- 
rule of  past  centuries,  we  can  none  the  less  believe  thai 
event  derived  its  peculiar  character  from  the  fact  that  its  a 
coming  forth  was  from  the  bosom  of  French  Encyclope 
The  doctrines  of  Voltaire,  Diderot,  Rousseau,  and  their  di 
pies  had  gradually  infected  French  opinion  till  (he  poison  was 
every-where  diffused.     Th  rature  of  the  day  was  infi- 

del or  atheistic.     Some  of  the  most  brilliant  pens  oi 
srere  in  its  service.     The  resull  was  an  aim. -si  universal  ;• 
leuce  of  religious  skepticism.     It  could  not  he,  th.  rcfore,  that, 
born  amid  such  influences,  the  Revolution  would  prove  an  ■ 
merely  to  achieve  political    freedom  ;   thai  opinio 
these  pouring  from  the  pn      and  with  which  the  popular  i 
was  so  thoroughly  imbuedjwonldnol  colorand 
being  made  to  break  the  power  of  d<  ,  and  i 

rHit'of  self  government.     Even  worse  thai 
foreboded  came  top;,-.     Religion,  treated  for  a  tim 
tronizing  tolerance,  n    tl  inioni  gol  i 

to  a  merely  servile  state.     Circled  with  restraints,  ai 
suffer  wrongs  which  will  be  an  eternal  stigma  on  the  R 
tion    n    was    finally    r 

which  reason  could  no    long  r  I  .lei   to.      Tim     ■'  ' 
early  assumed,  and  to  tl.. 
On  'the  one  side,  it  was  the  effort  of  a  greatly-suffering  ; 


574  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.       [Ot- 

to emancipate  themselves  from  bondage  ;  on  (lie  other,  of  infidel 
opinion  to  control  the  movement  adversely  to  religion. 

Lessons  of  vast  concern  to  nations  crowd  the  history  of  that 
unhappy  straggle.  That  Christianity  is  essential  to  liberty — 
that  iii  organizing  States  the  spiritual  should  be  untrammeled 
by  the  secular — that  the  spirit  of  infidelity  is  one  of  merciless 
proscription— that,  as  a  system,  Oatholici  '  unfri  lly  to 
popular  freedom — that  Christianity  is  invincible  by  human  or 
Satanic  power,  are  voicings  of  that  struggle  which  can  i 
die  away.  Some  of  these,  as  among  the  more  important  les- 
sons of  the  book,  we  desire  to  signalize  by  a  special  word. 

1.  That  religion  is  the  only  stable  basis  of  government  is 
attested  by  the  fact  that  the  empires  which  have  flourished  and 
endured  have  been  built  on  this  foundation.  The  religion 
built  on  may  be  false,  yet,  as  holding  of  the  spiritual,  it  1 
mastery  over  men  which  the  merely  temporal  is  unable  to 
exert.  A  faith  which  holds,  though  feebly,  the  great  trntl 
future  existence  and  accountability  is  a  stay  to  the  social  struc- 
ture which  a  purely  atheistic  basis  can  never  be.  Cicero, 
comparing  Rome  to  other  nations,  accounts  for  her  superior- 
ity on  the  ground  that  she  ''excelled  all  nations  and  peoples  in 
piety  and  religion,  and  in  this  one  wisdom  of  fully  recognizing 
that  all  things  are  ordered  and  governed  by  the  power  of  the 
immortal  gods.""-  Whatever  we  may  think  of  his  Roman 
partiality,  we  must  allow  the  sentiment  he  utters :  thai  not 
numbers,  nor  valor,  nor  policy,  nor  culture  arc  the  real  ele- 
ments of  national  stability;  that  only  a.-- nations  are  religious — 
recognize  that  over  them  is  an  Infinite  Ruler,  and  hold  them- 
selves accountable  to  him— -are  they  strong  to  overcome  the 
perils  which  endanger  their  existence. 

Christianity,  as  the  cleai  '  tion  of  the  future  and  of 

our  relation  to  it,  gives  a  sanction  I  ions  vastly 

more   potential,    and    lights    the   way    to    an    adjustment  of 
social  relations  vastly  more  perfect,  than   are  possible  to  any 

*Quam  volui 
p    10  ,  nee  ro 
hoc  ipso  hujn 

i   dpi,  ate,  i  s  una  snpieutia,  quod  deorum  iumortaliuin  nu- 

jiiino  omnia  rogi, 
mua — Ok .  ,:  ■' '  _         ■  '■'■ 


1869.]  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Ten   ,.  575 

other  religious  system.     It  enunciates  principles  and  intiv  ■■'■ 
agencies  whose  tendency   and  operation  are  so  to    mold 
individual  rind  to  regulate  society  as  to  secure,  with  the  leas 
restraint,  of  personal    freedom,  the  greatest    social  good.     Il 
affirms    the    sovereignty    of  God,    and   expressly   teaches  the 
equality  of  men.     While,  therefore,  it  claims  for  i 
of  all,  as  between  themselves  it  demands  for  each  the  ut 
liberty  consistent  with  that  social  order  which  it  also  sane  i 
Especially   it  demands  that    conscience   be   unfettered  ;  that 
thought  and  speech  be  free.     As,  therefore,  the  grout  trutl 
which  civil  and  religious  liberty  have  their  root  arc  the  : 
cation  of  Christian  it  j  alone,  rejecting  it  is  fatal  to  the  boj 
any  people  striving  to  be   free.     jSTo   sadder  illustration    I 
there  been  than  was  furnished  in  the  French  experiment.     If 
is,  in. truth,  a  demonstration  for  the  ages  of  the  impossibili 
founding  liberty  on  any  other  basis  than  that  of  Christii 
It  was  a  sublime  spectacle  which  France  presented  at  the  o 
ing  of  the  Revolution.     A  nation  that   till  recently  app 
hopelessly  decadent  had  i  I   a  blow  the  chai 

centuries  had   riveted,  and,  with   the  flush  of  youth  upon  il 
brow,  was  standing  in  the  morning  light  of  liberty,  lookingout, 
elate  with  joy,  on  a  future  of  unbounded  hope.     It  was  a 
which  neither  pen  nor  pencil  can  depict.     Paris  I 
enthusiasm,  and  the  glow  diffused  throughout   the  provii 
No  cloud  upon  the  sky,  no  muttering  in  the  air,  gave  I 
the  storm.- that  were  to  come     The  people  fancied  they 
free,  and  on  the  road  to  a  destiny  surpa  sing  all  their  dri 
What  was  their  mistake  ?     Why,  after  such  exi 
miss  the  goal  ?     The   primal  cause,  thai  to  which  all  ol 
may  be  traced,  was  the  effort  to  ally  freedom  with   irreli 
That  the  leaders  of  the  movement  were  hone  i  in  r. 
to  establish  liberty,  and,  for  a  time,  labored  at  the  task  wi 
patriotic  ardoi  rving  admiration,  none  familiar  wit' 

history  will  question.     Bui  they  disallowed  the  only  »toi 
which  the  structure  could  be  reared.     At  (ij 
liking,  but  in  deference  to  what  the}  counted  .-  i] 
were  willing  to  allou  religion 
were  attempting ;  but,.when   they  failed    I 
with  bound!'  ss  scorn  thej  est  '  it  utti 
build  on    the   negation  of   all   thai    makes    liberty  possi 


576  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.       [0 

Warned  we  may  well  be  by  the  monstrous  result.    But  1 
not  be  counted  any  fault  of  liberty  that  the  French  nation, 
starting  on  its  exodus  with  such  glowing  promise,  lost  the  way 
and  traveled  weary  years  to  reach  at  last  a  bon 
severe  than  that  from  which  they  sought  escape.     The  guides 
were  blind.     Other  leading  must  the  nation  follow  that  would 
be  tree.     If  the  French  saw  the  bloom  of  freedom  wither,  it 
was  because  iniidel  hands  rudely  plucked  it  from  the  stem.    If 
the  child  on  which  their  hope  was  set  proved  a  mons 
because  godless  accoucheurs  presided  at  the  birth;  if  it?  life 
was  sickly  and  its  death  untimely,  it  was  beci  as  poi- 

soned in  the  nursing. 

2.  After  the  foundation,  there  is  nothing,  perhaps,  of  more 
concern  to  liberty  than  a  right  adjustment  of  the  secula 
spiritual  in  the  struct  are  of  the  State.     "Within  a  cemun 
"have been  two  impressive  demo  i  ''"the  immense  advan- 

tage to  liberty  of  that  adjustment  which  leaves  religion  unem- 
barrassed by  any  organic  connection   with  the  When 
our  fathers  came  to  organize  the  liberty  their  arms  hail 
taught  by  their  traditions  they  resolved  in  no  deg] 
plicate  the  temporal  and  spiritual ;  to  cover  religion,  in  all  its 
forms,  with  the  shield  v^  impartial  protection,  but  neither  to 
assume  its  support  nor  meddle   with  its  worship.     The  leaders 
of  the  French  movement,  on  the  contrary,  swayed  in  p: 
ancient  complici                  d  in  part  by  unbelief,  began  with  the 
purp                   dinate  reli:  ion  1                            . 
from  step  to  step  till  they  had  compassed  its  complete  enslave- 
ment.    Both  of  these  experiments — the  one  in  its  success,  the 
other  in  its  fail i                                  of  the  right  adjustment  of 
these  relations.     The  latter,  ind                          disti 
than  that  in  organizing  liberty  it  is  fatal  to  invade  t:  ■ 
of  the  soul. 

In  order  I  «ate  what  •  beting  religi  n  in 

the  process  <■;'  framing  a  <  -  for  the  n  .  it  is 

necessary  to  have  in  mind  the  p  uditiou  of  the  Church 

one  of  the  ord  '  tate.     It  had  long  li 

the  sole  le  jalized  religi 

power,  and  ri"v    cd,  u 

banished,  put  to  death  ;  in  short,  emploj 
of  penalties  and  paius  to   silence  dissent     It    controlled  the 


1800.3  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  T        .  577 

education,  monopolized  the  offices,  and  kept  the  conscicnc<  ol 
the  nation;  in    a  word,  exercised   official    power  in   life  and 
dealli  over  body,  and  mind,  and  soul.     Its  wealth  was  enor- 
mous.    The  piety  of  the  living  and  the  fears  of  the  dying  Lad. 
lor  age-,  been   augmenting  its   possessions.    The  E 
found  it  with  an  annual  revenue  of  two  hundred  rnilli* 
That  with  such  resourci   .  moral   and   material,  it   should  be 
potent  in  the  secular  sphere  was  altogether  natural.     In  i 
functions  of  the  government  it  was,  in  fact,  controlling.     On 
occasion  it  could  make  its  power  felt  even  to  the  throne,     i ' 
thus  a  partner  of  the  State,  it  was  naturally  anxious  to  con 
that  peculiar  civil  polity  i  o  fa's  <  irable  to  its  own  ■  ;  oient. 

This  espousal  by  the  Church  of  that  despotic  order  which  the 
liberal   party   were  determined    either   to  reform   or  enti 
supersede,  taken  in  connection  with  the  skepticism  of  its  1 
ers,  explains  the  hostile  attitude  which  the  Revolution,  i 
very  outbreak,  assumed  toward  the  Church.     While  many  of 
its  members,  and  a  fair  proportion  of  its  inferior  clergy,  were 
in  accord  with  the  spirit  of  the  hour,  with  few  exception 
higher  clergy,  who  controlled  its  policy,  had  no  liking  ' 
movement  which  they    knew  would  deal    roughly  with   :" 
pretensions.     Thus  began  that  breach  between  Liberalism 
Christianity  which   infidel  leaders  were    able  to  widen,  till  at 
last,  in  complete  divorce,  they   fought   each   other  throu 
night    of    anarchy  on    which    it   seemed    no    morning    v 
rise. 

It  was  therefore  likely  in  advance  that,  when  they  came  1" 
legislate  for  the  new  order   of  things,  their  course  toward  n 
Church  so  unfriendly  to  their  aims  would  noi  I 
perhaps,  judicious.     And  so  il  proved.     The  coercive  tei 
of  the  leaders  was  apparent  from  the  start.     B 
thy  to  i  /'.':  ion,  th    Eina  '  tress  of  tin 

them  to  seize  its  property.     The  immense  wi  alth  of  the  <  "■■ 
could  it  be  devoted  to  the  uses   of  the  State,  would  i 
present  trouble,  and  enable  the  nation  to  bi  gin  auspi< 
new  career.     Hence  I  -t  and    feeling  impelled  tl 

to  nnspai  in  tion.     Authority  to  di 

was  claimed  on  the  ground  that  corpora^  I 
existence  from  civil  law,  hold  their  rights  by  the  same  tei 
and  that,  consequently, any  lithe  thej  po      -  .  Iiavii  j 


578  Religion  and  the  Eeign  of  Terror.      [< 

onlj  in  the  sanction  of  law,  may  be  altered  or  annul] 

itivc  power.     As  a  reason  for  applying  v. 
to  the  pending  question,  it  was  maintained  that  the  weall 
the  Church  was  a  moral  disadvantage;  that  ri 
the  priests,  and  thai  consequently  a  true  regard  for  the  h 
ests  of  religion  demanded  of  them  to  free  the  el< 
great  impediment  to  their  appropriate  work.     After  i 
debate  of  nearly  a  month  the  alienating  derive  was  ] 
terms  were  these:  "All  the  property  of  the  clergy  i-  i  I 
disposal  of  the  nation  on  condition  that  it  shall,  provide  in  a 
fitting  manner  fo]  the  expens   j  of  worship,   the  maintenance 
of  its  ministers,    and  the   necessities  of  the  poor.     As  to  the 
dispositions  to  be  made  for  the  mini  .  they  shall 

be  paid  each  not  less  than  one  thousand  two  hundred  fi 
not   including  lodging  and  the  use  of  a  garden."     Such  was 
their  decision  of  the  gravest  question  with  which  the  Revolu- 
tion had  to  deal.     How  unwise  it  was  the  histor 
fully  to  appreciate. 

The  execution  oi'  this  decree  caused  intense  agitation.     The 
initial  step  was  an  order  enjoining  every  holder  of  a  be::  . 
to  furnish  the  court.-    a  del  of  the  property  of  i 

kind    pertaining   thereto.     With    more    than    prudent    1 
decrees  followed,  first,  for  the  immediate  sale  of  p] 
the  amount   of  hundreds  of  millions   of  francs;  next,  for  the 
unhousing  and  suppression  of  the  monastic  orders ;  then,  for 
the  pensioning  of  monks ;  and   last,  fort) 
the    confiscated    property.     These   respective   measure-    were 
adopted  after  prolonged    and    able,  bur   acrimonious  and  in- 
tensely-irritating. On  the  side  of  the  deputi 
with  argument  and  el  seldom  snrj 
frequent  exhibition  of  defi an  1  and  ex:   |  Q.     On  the 
side  of  the   clergy,  along  with   some   noble    utl 
were  earnest  deprecation  and  frantic  appi    '.  there 
were   •     ics  of  frenzied  cxcitei                      when  p 
to  such  a  pitch  that  bloodj  col 
force. 

In  treating  the  qut  *tion  of  prop<  rty  the  1 
era!  times  violate  d   right :  of  c        ii  This,  however, 

as  ye!    elicited    I  »non- 

Btrance.     They  fought  with  desperate  earnestness  I 


1809.]  Religion  and  the  JRcitjn  of  Terror. 

their  rich  endowments ;  but  scarcely  an  earnest  word  hi 
been  spoken  in  defense  of  religious  liberty.     Bui  this  wa 
to  last.     The  steps  already  taken  by  the  Assembly  inv 
the  necessity  of  going  further,  and  from  this  point  I 
of  legislation  was  deplorably  inconsiderate  of  the  righti  of 
science.     When  the  Assembly  took  in  hand  to  adjust  the  fr 
work  of  the  Church  to  the  new  civil  order  an  ecclesiastical  fac- 
tion, with  many  wrongs  to  avenge,  in  coalition  will)  the  i 
leaders,  gave  it  a  constitution  utterly  subversive  of  the  ol< 
ganic  form.      It  abolished   many  bishoprics,  aim  is!   ignored 
the  jurisdiction  of  the  Pope,  suppre  and  titl  s,  re- 

duced the  number  of  schools,  gave  to  Protestant 
and  infidels  an  equal  right  with  Catholics  to  vote  in  the  i  I 
of  Church  incumbents,  and  in  effect  so  weakened  and  embar- 
rassed the  officials  thus  selected  that  the  ultimate  authority  in 
things  spiritual  rested  largely  with  the  civil  power.     Had  this 
constitution  been  the  work  of  a  Church  council  it  would  have. 
been  a  grievous  wrong,  but  its  enactment  by  a  political  a 
bly  was  an  outrage  on  the  dearest  right;  of  man.     Ko  wonder 
it  proved  a  Pandora-box  of  direst  evils  to  the  liberal  c 

In  man}  parts  of  the  country  the  population,  al- 

ready much   excited  by  the  sale  oi'  their  churches  and   m 
teries,  were  unable  quietly  to  bear  this  new  infliction.     Mut- 
terings  of  revolt  were  heard.     The  smoldering  fires  of  pa 
kindled   to  a  blaze  as  the  news  of  its  ad  iption  went  abroad. 
This  frenzied  discontent  made  it  easy  for  the  disaffected  < 
to  organize  a  counter-revolution.     Nocturnal   meeti 
held,  and  inflammatory  speeches  made.     By  tongue  and  pen 
the  Assembly  was  denounced  as  infai 

sented  as  a  crime  which  if  was  religious  to  oppose.      Over  all 
the  land  opposition  was  organized.     By  sccre!  i 
the  Pope  did   all  he  could   to  foment   the  trouble.     En  i 
places  the  enforcement  of  the  Constitution  was  stubbornly  with- 
stood.    Irritated  by  this  resistance,  the  Ai  erably  adop 
measure  which  had  the  effect  to  alienate  n 
many  of  its  warmest  friends.     It  was  an  order  "requiri 
who  lu'h!  positions  in  the  Church  to  take  an  oath  to  -  ipport 
and  obey  not  r'\\\  the  laws  of  the  laud  in  general,  but  to 
tain  with  all  their  power  the  Civil  Constitution  of  the  ( 
as  decreed  by  the  Assembly,  -and  thai  on  pain  of  ejection 


580  Religion  rind  the  Reign  of  Terror.       [October, 

office,  forfeiture  of  pension,  and  loss  of  citizenship."  The  en- 
forcement of  this  outrageous  oath  was  commenced  with  the 
clerical  members  of  the  Assembly.  The  scene  that  followed 
was  unspeakably  sad,  yet  truly  grand;  sad,  in  that,  on  the 
side  of  those  representing  liberalism,  there  was  nulling  but  an 
insulting  exhibition  of  the  most  hateful  despotism  ;  grand,  for 
noble  words  and  brave  deeds  on  the  other  side,  in  vin  licati 
truest  liberty.  The  note  of  resistance  that  day  struck  electri- 
fied the  Church.  Emulous  of  the  grand  example  set  by  the 
clerical  representatives,  Church  officials  every-where  refi 
the  oath;  and  when  the  task  of  its  attempted  imposition  was 
completed,  it  was  found  that  all  hut  four  of  the  hie 
thirty-one  Bishops,  aud  a  multitude  of  the  inferior  clergy,  had 
preferred  the  forfeiture  of  office  and  pension  and  citizen 
to  their  retention  on  terms  which  conscience  disallowed.  So 
serious  was  tin?  result  that  for  a  m  mient  even  the  most  radical 
of  the  Assembly  showed  concern  to  allay  the  storm  they  bad 
provoked  ;  but  it  was  fatal  to  pacific  thought.-  that  Rome  about 
this  time  threw  all  its  power  in  favor  of  the  refractory  clergy. 
"While  the  Pope  had  not  concealed  hi.-  disapproval  of  all  that 
had  been  done  since  the  convocation  of  the  States-General,  nor 
left  in  doubt  the  stand  he  would  ultimately  take,  he  yet,  for 
reasons  of  policy,  was  slow  to  utter  an  official  condemnation. 
But  silence  was  no  longer  politic.  The  oath  was  a  1>!>>\\  a;  his 
supremacy  not  to  be  endured,  .  ud  hi.-  fulmination  went  forth 
denouncing,  protesting,  asserting,  aud  (dosed  1  ly  ab- 

juring "all  Catholic-,  in  the  name  of  their  <  ternal  salvation,  to 
remain  faithful  to  the  ancient   five-  of  the  Church   and  to 
Holy  See."     The   immediate  effect  wa>  to  rend  the  Church. 
One  part,  embracing  nearly  all  the  Bishops,  a  I  u'tion 

of  the  clergy,  and  a.  multitude  of  members,  remained  loyal  to 
the  Pope;  the  other  accepted  the  yoke  of  civil   domini 
An^ry  opposition  to  the  thin;'  r  broke  out  on  ever)  side.     The 
nation,  rocked  in  the  storm  of  increasing  agitation^  began  to 
feel  the  throes  .vliicli  i     tin  end  brought  forth  Terror. 

Surely  no  clearer  demon  I  needed  of  the  hurt  to  lib- 

crty  of  thai  an         :  trol  of  re- 

ligion than  is  furni  lied  by  the  evils  into  which  it  piling* 
French  nation.     J',   is,  however,  rendered  still  more  clear  l>\ 
what  occurred   later  in  tin  e.      Afl   the  nigh:   of  I 


1869.]  -Religion  and  the   Reign  of  Terror.  5S1 

wore  away  the  more  candid  of  the  leaders  began  to  admit  that 
error  in  the  matter  of  organizing  religion  was  the  source  of 
their  greatest  troubles ;  that  fr<  with 

which  laws  should  not  meddle.    These  principles  were  al  length 
embodied  in  the  Constitution,  and  with  the  happiesi    results. 
The  storm  began  to  subside,  the  sky  to  clear,  and   the  a 
liberty,  righting  itself,  set  forth  again  with  fail- 
getting  safely  into  port.     That  it  failed  to  enter,  or,  a:  I 
came  in  with  but  a  portion  of  the   precious  things  it  carried, 
the  author  charges  to  the  perfidy  of  Napol 

The  differing  estimates  of  this  famous  man  are  among  the 
cuvions  things  of  history.     National  antipathy  explains  tl  i 
traction  of  Scott ;  the  inspiration  of  Abbott's  fulsome  panegyric 
is  not  easy  to  assign  ;  but  however  explained,    it  is  a  fact  thai, 
writers  on  his  career  have  seemedmore  intent  to  gild  < 
his  character  than  to  set  it  in  the   coloring  of  truth.     Tim.-, 
however — le  grand justicier  du        se — to  use  an  expression  of 
Montaigne's,  at  hist  fades  out  e\\:XY  false  tint,  and  hangs  the 
perfect  picture  in  its  rightful  place.     We  have  the  i 
that  Pressense  has  done  much  to  complete  that  portrail  of  .Na- 
poleon which  the  future  will  accept.     Conceding  his 
and  the  value  of  his  services  to  France,  he  yet  affirms  thai 
was  possessed  of  an  "insolent  contempt  of  every  superior  prin- 
ciple, of  all  right,  of  all  liberty."     In  proof,  he  shows  that  from 
the  coup  d'etat  which  made  him  First   Consul  he  had  but   a 
single  purpose — to  centralize  .all  power  in  himself,  I 
glory  of  empire  to  martial  renown  ;  that  his  policy  in  m; 
of  religion  was  conceived  and  followed  with  the  single  \i<  w  to 
further  tins  design  ;  that  to  gain  the  assist! 
enslaved  religion;  that,  in  a  word,  he  disregan  ;    right 

in  order  to  build  up  a  despotism  wl)  would 

so  contrast  with  the  anarchy  an  .  '  the  Revolution 

blind  the  nation  to  its  real  character.     No  pari   of  th<   I 
has  left  on  us  a    adder  it 

this  perfidious  course.     Thai    the   liberal   moveincu 
!       th  from   its  great  embarrassment,  and  advancing  to  sue- 
tu    j,  should  be  again  arr<  itself  imi 

is  all  the  more  to  be  itcd  in  it-  row  kind,. 

execration  at  the  thought  that  it  was  t!  who, 

in  the.  moment  when  their  freedom  seemed  assured,  fotl 

Podjrth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — 37 


5S2  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.  •     [Octo 

thorn  again.     Hut  it  is  a  thought  we  cannot  put  away  :  the 
author  sustains  the  verdict  he  pronounces  by  facts  which  fore- 
close appeal.     No  part  of  the  boot    is  more  conclusive  in  its 
logic  than  that  which  fastens  on  Napoleon  the  odium  of  hi 
sacrificed  to  his  own  ambition  the  most  precious  fruits  o 
Revolution. 

3.  Another  truth  of  saddest  illustration  in  that  strug    '       tin 
intolerance  of  unbelief.     Skeptical  leaders  were   throughout 
fierce  and  vengeful  persecutors.     Their  impatience  of  die 
beginning  with  insolent  words,  exhausted  the  possi 
■outrage.     The  sanctioning  of  mobs,  the  banishment  and  mas- 
sacre of  priests,  the  enormities  of  the  Rev< 
and  the  final  infamous  attempt  to  abolish  religion,  were  i 
hitions  of  intolerance  unsurpassed  in  the  hi 
If  other,  proof  were  needed  of  theessential  proseriptiv<  ,. 
fidelity  it  is  found  in  the  later  history  of  the 
successive  phase  of  unbelief,  as  il  rose  to  )■         .  .      died  every 
other  with  a  hate  as  merciless  as  thai  displayed  against  religion. 
Atheism,  in  the  brief  period  of  its  ascendency,  hurled  its 
against  Deism  with  no  less  fiendish  rage  than   against  C 
tianity;  and  when  Robespierre  triumphed,  Deism  follow 
■deniers  to  the  scaffold  with  as  much  delight  a-  ev<     it    • 
rienced  at  the  death  of  priests.     In  fact  the  history  of  unbelief, 
whether  in  the  bald  negations  of  Atheism,  or  in  thi 
firmations  of  Deism,  or  in  the  floral  wreathing  of  Theophilan- 
thropy,  was  as  intolerant  of  unbelieving  as  of  religious  differ- 
ences.    Its  treatment  of  the  latter  was  so  hurtful  to  the  liberal 
■cause,  and  is  hence  so  prominent  among  if  the 

book,  that  it  demands  a  more  particular  statement. 

Alarmed  at  the  rupture  of  the  Church,  the  Assembly  labored 
to  secure  the  non-conforming  party  protection  in  their  worship; 
but  popular  passion  was  mightier  than  decree-.    Liberty  of  wor- 
ship for  non-juring  Catholics  was  in  reality  hut  a  name, 
was  periled,.  lost,  in  the  efforl   to  enjoy  what  law 

allowed.     Mobs  expelled  them  fr the  chin.-'  d  for 

their    worship,  i    •   threw  their   altars,   and    indulg< 

them  all  the  promptings  of  vindictive  rage.     ! 

lative  Assembly  their  condition  was  even  wore 

course  of  this  body  is  explained  in  ,  peculiar  coi 

sition,  and  in  part,  by  the  circumstances  under  which  il 


1869.]  Bdigion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror. 

called  to  deliberate.     It  was  largely  composed  o\'  young  men 
chosen  mainly  for  their  revolutionary  zeal.     Among 
men  of  splendid  talents,  but  inexperienced  in  the  work  of  leg- 
islation.    For  a  time  the  leaders  were  the  famous  Girondist 
deputies;  but  along  with  :!  '   soon  to  be  their  \:  • 

were  the  Mountain  party,  the  future  men  of  tei  these 

impulsive  natures  the  times  were  constantly  applying  the  - 
of  irritation.     Many  of  the  Bishops,  on  surrcndi  . '  .  had 

fled  the  country,  and  in  their  exile  some  of  them  were  concert- 
ing with  the  Pope  and  with  royalists  abroad  to  fomenl 
satisfaction,  hoping  so  to  manage  the  reactionary  mo 
ultimately  to  defeal  the  Revolution  and  restore  the  old  regi  i  . 
It  Mas  not  strange,  therefore,  that  youthful,  fiery  men.  w3 
attachment  to  the  Revolution  was  an  absorbing  •  were 

driven  by  a  knowledj  e  plots  into  1< 

se\  erity.    Certain  it  is  that  compulsion  was  the  single  note  they 
struck,  and,  through  a  rising  se;fle  of 
end.     Scarcely  laid  they  entered  on  their  work  when  tidin 
increasing    agitation   poured  in  from   every  quarter.     In  one 
place  a  mob  massacred  two  hundred  men  and  women  susp 
of  opposition  to  the  Revolution.     The  Assembly,  by  a  most 
iniquitous  decree,  justified  the  crime.     It  was  a  rapid 
anarchy,  for  it  pledged  impunity  to  lawlessness,     hi  en 
said  to  mobs,  Riot  and  kill,  the  blood  of  the  dii 
crates  the  dagger.     This  virtual  license  of  the  mob  soon  bore 
its  natural  fruit.     The  revolutionary  fury  rose  to  an  .a; 
mood.    Wherever  it  dared,  the  popular  wrath  practi 
the  non-conforming  party  every  enormity  of  law;--.-  rage.     It 
increased  the  trouble  that  this  outrageous  tr< 
always  quietly  received.     In 
was  strong  they  were  far  from  turning  the  otl 
smitten.     Blows  were  given  in  return.     Tin 
the  Assembly  in  a  '  JU(Ji' 

cious  legislation.     In  order  "  the  more  quickl}  I 
enemies  of  the  Revolution,"  ii  was  pr<  id,  in  their 

case,  the  operation  of  the  laws :  and  ;]    ugn  in  form,  I 
was'nol   taki  n,  a  ;  which  virtual^ 

the  ni  h-conforming  party.      It  failed  of 
the  veto,  besides  being  widely  di  regarded,  bn 
flict  with  the  King  which  -  avulsed  the  nation,  and  in  tl 


584         .       Beligion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.        [0 

bore  him  to  execution.     The  immediate  effed  was  a  terrible 
exasperation   of  the  revolutionary  party.     The  treatise 
suspected  priests  became  more  brutal  than  ever.     From  • 
provinces  they  were  exiled,  in  others  they  wer<  into 

prisons  foul  from  heat  and  lack  of  air,  where  they  end 
untold  sufferings,  and  in  many  cases  escaped  starvation  only 
through  succor  stealthily  conveyed  by  friends.     In  frequent  in- 
stances they  were  put  to  death. 

Convents    declining   the  services   of  Constitutional  pri 
were  assailed  by  mobs,  forcibly  entered,  and  their  inmates  bru- 
tally treated.     Nuns  were  sometimes  whipped  with  rod-. 
persecuting  spirit  of  the  Assembly  culminated  in  a  dec:. 
extradition  against  accused  priests.     But  they  had  now  quite 
lost  control  of  the  Revolution.     Passion  was  too  wild  to  be  kept 
within  the  limits  of  the  most  proscriptive   laws.     There  ' 
opposition  which  law  hud  failed  to  crush,  and  the  mo] 
resolved  to  try  the  knife.     The  spectacle  exhibited   in    I 
and  in  other  parts  of  France  in  the  autumn  of  1792 
palling  beyond  the  power  of  description.     That  tin 
the    Hejptembnseurs    had    their   inspiration "  in    hatred    ol  the 
Church  party  admits  of  no  dispute.     One  of  the  ward-  of  Pi    '- 
openly  voted  "that  all  the  priests  and  suspected   per 
fined  in  the  prisons  of  Paris  and  other  cities  b 
The  mob  performed  the  bloody  work.     "  At  a  half  doyrn  dif- 
ferent prisons  in  Paris  the  priests  were  butchered  en 
the  provinces  followed  the  example  of  the  capital."     But  a 
was  now  aroused    which  none   could   lay.     Infuriate  crowds, 
athirst  for  blood,   poured    from    the  alleys  and    faubourg 
Pari.-,  and,  with  the  aspect  of  unchained  d 
city  dav  and  night,  pcrpi  trating  butcherii  e  of  the  i 
in(*  barbarity.     Th    e,  however,  proved  bill  the  prelude  I 
drama  of  terror.     One  of  the   I  i  ■  the  Natl 

vention  was  to  organize   machinery  through   which    I 
weapon.1  of  proscription  with  discerning  aim,  and  with  all  the 
powerof  the  State.     A  Revolutionary  Tribunal  and 
tee  of  Public  Safety  were  i 

from  its  ii  '  leci  ion    :  ':  '  ;n<  >•  -'  v  ' 

victims  of  tin  it    h  ite.     To  ■•  thcr  they  formed  an  cngini  rr  of 
murderous  proscription  more  terrible  tin  ' 

suspected  might  chide;  that  marked  them  secretly  and- 


1869J  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror. 

them  as  with  lightning-stroke.     With  such  accusers  and  jud 
and  with  the  guillotine  to  execute  their  vengeful  arbiti 
nothing  could  surpass  the  terror  it  inspired.     '  were 

always  flying,  or  ever  ready  to  be  hurled.     It  excites  no  Bur- 
prise  that  this  machinery  was  used  to  the  utmost  in  reli 
persecution,  when  it  is  remembered  that  the  National  Conven- 
tion was  more  thoroughly  imbued  with  the  infidel  pi 
and  numbered    more   enthusiastic  advocates  of  its  p 
principles,  than  either  of  the  preceding  legisli  five  b  >di<  - :  but 
that  its  spirit  was  so  brutal  ought  surely  to  rebuke  the  ; 
sions  of  philosophy  to  master  human  passion.     The  pi 
of  Nero  was  hardlj  more  inhuman.     When,  for  instance. 
of  money  prevented  deportation  of  the  priests. 
were  sent  to  the  scaffold.     In  different  places  they  \ 
sacred  and  drowned.     Death  within  twenty-four  hoiu 
decreed  fate  of  every  priest  returning  from  abroad  "  susp 
of  relations   with  the  enemy.''     Bi  ; 
can    alone  impart  an  adequate  impression    of  the  rem.  * 
cruelties  practiced  by  these  apostles  < 

moreover,  that  they  had  other  aim;,  than  that   |  ;  'hat 

their  real  object  was  not  so  much  to  compel  civil  subn 
as  to  crush  religion.     It  must  forever  bar  the  pica  of  pati 
ardor,  as  a  palliation  of  their  crimes,  that  their  persecution 
was  now  indiscriminate.     No  sooner   did   tin;  Terrorist 
sure  of  power  than  they  began  to  unmask.     Catholics  i' 
accord  with  the  Revolution  were  no  less  via  ti 
than  others.     The  proof  accumulates  with  e\ 
real  purpose  was  to  strike    down  Christianity.     Tli 
demolition  began  with  the   abn  be  Chri  tian  eal 

dar.     The  year  was  made  to  date  from  the  founding 
Republic;  the  old  weeks  were  superseded  b}  < 
the  months  were  given  first  a  philosophical,  and  then  a  po< 
cal,  nomenclature ;  and  a!!  this  avowedly  to  free  tl 
from  all  association  with  religion.     At  1<  ngth,  whe 
and  the  pre      had  duly    ,  .   and  tcntatr 

raenta  had  shown  that  il  i 

■ 
denunciations  and  scandalous  aposl 
abolished,  an. I    a  worship   of 
was  there  worship  so   misni  ined.      The  Saturnalia  of  | 


586  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.       [Ocl 

Rome  were  not  more  licentious  and  disgusting  than  the  i 
inations  Atheism   practiced  in  the  celebration  of  it?  w 
Churches  were  transformed  into  halls  of  revelry.     "An 
priests  were  seen  dancing  with  harlots  around   brighl  fir 
by  holy  bo  >ks  i  nd  ritua]  ,  and  relics.     And  tin 

was   propagated  like   a    sort  of  death-dance  thro:.   ' 
nation."     Then,  that  the  new  religion  might  lade  nothii 
perfection,  the  Convention  hastened  to  canonize  i 
was  fitting  that  Marat— the  man  who,  by  consent  of  all,  \ 
the  crown  ...Satanic  eminence,  among  the  demons  of  the  Rev- 
olution— should  be  awarded  this  distinction.     With  enthu  ' 
demonstrations,  his  remains  were  transferred  to  the  Pantheon. 
" The  veneration  for  this  monster  knew  no  bounds.     H 
were  written  in  his  honor.     On  divers  stamps  he  was  | 
by  the  side  of  Christ.     Men  swore  by  the  sacred  heart  of  Marat. 
The  new  worship  was  complete;  it    had 
desses,  and   a   man   of  violence  and  blood  for  a  martyr  and. 
saint." 

Now  that  Christianity  was   a   religio  ittu  Ita  in  Franc  . 
adherents  fared  worse  than  ever.     They  were  span  I 
of  oppression  or  outrage  in  the  compass  of  vindictive  ]-<>•.. 
invent  and  practice,     ii    seemed  the  purpose  of  th( 
clique  to  extinguish,  if  need  be  in  seas  of  blood,  the  last  spark 
of  Christian   faith.     But    a   rule  so*  monstrous  could    not  last. 
Availing  .:-'.'  tl  e  protest  which   muttered   in  the  popular  I 
against  tin  e  disgusting  practices,  Robespierre,  in  the  inte 
of  Deism,  struck  down  the  Atheistic  party,  and  sent  its  li 
to  the  guillotine.     Their  overthrow,  however,  afforded  I 
•  tians  no  relief ;  for  though  liberty  of  worship  firmed 

by  the  Convention,  in    practice   it  was  evcry-where  ignored. 
The  cheerless  worship  of  the  Eternal,  with  which  Robespierre 
was   able  to  di  place   the   indecent  and    revolting    i 
Atheism,  was,  with   loud  protestations  of  liberality, 
i     ecriptive.      i  yed    from   using  terror  only  h\    the 

fall  of  its  founder.     Il  i-  both  a  pr<  anarchy  which 

terror  had  |  rod  lc  d,  and  a  f<  n  lul  ii.  -   tribution, 

in  fift 

in    which    R<  I     :  •  itc    had    played    the    rol<    of 
and  from    which    he  cam..'   the   arbiter  of  destinies,  he 
borne  to  the  scaffold  throui  tion  and  i 


1869.3  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror.  587 

unequaled    in  the  case  of   any   other  victim   of  the   guillo- 
tine. 

The  final  lesson  we  may  note  is  the  manner  in  which  Chris- 
tianity endured  this  severe  and  protracted   assault.      Never, 
perhaps,  was  it  assailed  at  greater  disadvantage  to  itself  than 
at  the  opening  of  the  Re volution.     So  many  Delilahs  had  ca- 
ressed and  weakened  it  thai  it  seemed  at  the  mercy  of  ite 
It  is  to  be  lamented  that  the  apostles  of  unbelief  foun 
in  the  scandalous  abuses  of  the  ecclesiastical  system  to  poinl 
and  wing  the  arrows  of  their  hate     Caricature,  invective,  scorn, 
poured  their  missiles  with  terrible  efFecl  on  the  follies  of  the 
Church.     Every  bolt  crashed    through  some  rotten    < 
And  though,  in  reality,  religion  was  untouched  by  these  assaults, 
and  would  have  been  by  the  inter  demolition  of  its  exi 
organism,  yet  to  a  people  unaccn  tom<  d  to  dii  tinguisb  between 
religion  and  the  Church,  it  was  at  the  disadvantage  of  seeming 
to  deserve  the  derision  poured  on  its  corrupt  organization.     [1 
had  the  further  disadvantage  of  a  false  position.     Religion  and 
liberty  are  friends;  their  grand  ideas  travel  in  the  same  di 
tion  ;  but  perfidy  to  its  principles  on  the  part  of  those  claii 
to  represent   religion  set  them  in  apparent  op]  The 

Catholic  Church  of  France  has  no  di    ,  grace  than   that 

when  the  great  principle  of  the  Gospel,  thai  in  Christ  men  are 
equal,  was  asserting  itself,  it  joined  with  despotism  to  perpetu- 
ate its  negation.     It,  therefore,  was  not  strange  that,  cumbered 
with  corruptions,  and  seeming  to  oppose  the  cause  it  favore  . 
ligion  was  unable  for  a  tin)''  to  make  a  worthy  defense.     Truly 
it   was  pitiful  1"  see  the  clergy  so  conccn  ed   i-  pi 
external  pomp,  and  yet  so  careless  of  the  blows  whicl 
were  aiming  at  its  life.     But  il 
While  the  course  of  its  assailant    . 
ive,  the  course  of  its  defenders  was  becoming  worthi 
cause.     Losing  ;:i  the  fires  of  trial  much  that  marred 
manifestations,  their  resistance  beca 
in  countless  instances   a  hcroi  nt  worthy  to  rank  with  I  i 
sheds  undying  glory  on  the  mai  ' 

volume  sho   '  itno  -  that  no  corrup- 

tions of  tomi  can  extinguish  the  life  of  (  liristianity.     A 
pics  of  this  witness  we  cite  the  following:  "  My  choii  e  ;   in 
said  Abbol  Paquot  to  those  who  wer<  urj  ing  I  :.  i  t<   I  ke  the 


588  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Terror. 

oath;  «  I  prefer  death  to  perjury.     If  I  had  two  lives  1 
give  one  of  them  to  you,  bul  as  I  have  but  one  ]  si 
for  God."     "These  are  tlie  golden  day    of  the  Church,5 
the  language  of  many  on  the  way  to  death;  "these  are  the 
times  to  try  the  courage  of  her  true  children."     "  A  large  num- 
ber of  nuns,  who  were  confined  in  a  single  prison, 
nobly  in  these  words  to  tin  ir  |  ■  -  cutors,  who  charged  I 
with  fanaticism  :  'It  is  fanatics  who  slaughter  and  kill,  b 
pray  for  such.'     'You  shall  be  sent  abroad.'     'Wh 
arc  sent   we  will  pray.'     'Whither  would   you   prefer  I 
sent?5     'Where  there  are  the  most  of  suffering  ones  h 
sole,  and  these  are  nowhere  more  than   in  France.'     'Il'  you 
remain  here  it  is   to  die.'     'Then  we  will  die.'     Tl 
women  sang  aloud,  and  joyfully,  sacred  hynms  at  the  foot  of  the 
scaffold."     The  author  closes  his  allusion  to  the  September  mas- 
sacres in  these  inspiring  and  admonitory  \v..rds: 

Nothing  is  more  glorious  in  all  the  annals  of  martyrdom  than 
seme  of  these  scenes.     They  combined  an  emulati 

ism  with  a  heart-trusting 'piety.     The  vi       abl<     Ircl  bisl ;' 

Aries,  thanking  God  for  the   duty  of  offering  his  blood    fi  . 
cause — those   prints  confessing  to  each   otl      . 
other  the  kiss  of  peace  b  fore  laying  their  heads  on  the   Glock— 
those  answers,  kind  but  firm,  and  worthy  of 
—all  t}iO--t-  noble  manifestations  of  a  religion  at  that'  time  in  such 
ill  repute — all  this  throws  ;l  celestial  light  on  the  close  oi   an  in- 
credulous century,  a  ud  reveals  the  presence  of  God  with  an  ex- 
traordinary power  at  the  very  momenl  when  ■  mpt 
is  about  to  be  made  to  banish  hi-  worship  from  society.     From 
the  blood  of  all  these  massacred  persons  a  warnin  j  voi 
It  says  to  :■■'<  I   aiders  of  civil  pow  er,  li 
science,  for  it  will  surely  rise. pure  and  triumphant   over  yoi 
saults,-and  leave  you  covered  with  defeat  and  shi 

It  is  gratifying  that   the  work   has  hem   gii 
readers  in  a  way  so  worthy  of  its  merits.     The  translatio 
Professor  La  roi  ;  not  merely  preserves  . 

but  also  in  a  high  degree  thai  graphic  charm  which  I 
marie'!  or  lost  in  the  proce?    of  transferring  thought  from  ■ 
expression  to    uotln  i*.     It  has  been  widely  noticed  by  the  |  i 
and  without  exception,  so  far  as    .  en,  in  term    ■ 

mendation.     hi  one  or  tw<  ,  otherwise  favorabl 

arc  statements  likely  to  convey  a  wrong  hnpre 
glish  work  in  oue  respect.     "It  is  diflicil 


1869.]  Religion  and  tfo  Reign  of  Terror. 

"to  say  precisely  what  tins  book  is.     It  is  no!  a  translatio 
the  original  work.    Mr.Lacroixin  one  place  calk  it  an- a' 
menr,'  in  another  a  'digest.'"     Now  if  from  : 
sion  be  taken  that  the  boo*  has  been  so  modified  in  the  pi 
of  rendition  as  to  have  lost  material  identity  with  tL 
it  is  utterly  at  fault.     ^Vc  have  looked   through  the   French 
work  sufficiently  to  feel  justified  in  saying,  that,  while 
details  are  sometimes  con  tated,  and  sp 

questions  lacking  the  interest  for  American  renders  which  I 
had  for  French  are  in  some  instances  epitomized,  the  .-  ib 
always  presented,  and  that  in  other  respects  the  original  i-  fully 
rendered.     This  method  of  preparing  the  work  in  Ei  j 
we  understand,  the  author's  cordial  approbation.     The  in 
of  tlie  work  is  enhanced  by  a  biographical  appendix,  carefully 
prepared,  by  the  translator.     It  has.  besides,  what  tl  • 
lack-,  that  requisite  of  every  complete  book,  a  copi 
The  publish*  rs  show  their  appreciation  of  the  work  in  th 
gant  and  attractive  style  in  which  they  have  issued  it.     ] 
have  done  the  author  a  favor,  and  the  cause  of  civil  i 
ious  liberty  a  signal  service  in  sending  it  forth  in  a  form 
at  a  cost  so  favorable  to  its  extensive  circulation. 


Akt.  VI.— YOUNG  MEN'S  CHRISTIAN    ^SSOCIAI  !' 

Oxf.  of  the  most  hopeful  signs  of  the  times,] 
point   of  view,   i<  tl  g  the  youthful   i 

Church  in  the  service  of  the  Divin<    '  EE< 

energy  has   been    repressed,  rather    than 
quence  of  the  imperfect  facilities  for  its  employe 

The   (     ri    ii  !    in  I  it    tions  of  to-da}    ne<  d   tl 
young  bl  ■  •  ;   and   vigorou  •  energj . 
Hung  ■'  .  only  one  in   eleven  of  tli 

membership  of  thai  State  is  under  forty  year 
shows  thai   the  sympatl  i<  •  of  the  ) 
enlisted  in  the  cause  of  religion  ;  and 
shall  be  the  future  of  the  Church?     Am 


Nol  ' 


590  Young  Mentis  Christian  A       iaiions.     COcI 

around  the  standard  of  the  cross,  and  enlists  them  Id 
of  the  Christian  workers  of  the  age,  is  an  augury  of  bl 
the  future. 

The  peculiar  t<  inptations  to  which  young  men  are  exposed  in 
the  cities  make  >ns  especiall;  le.     In  the 

greal  emporia  of  t-.il  and  traffic,  the  manufacturing  and  com- 
mercial  centers  of  the  country,  are  gathered  . 
aggregate  number  of  young  men,  mosl  of  wh    .  ■  the 

country.     Cities  will  al  be  the  centers  where  good  and 

evil  are  manifested  in  their  intensest  and  most  active  i 
Like  the  fabh  ]  dragons  of  old,  demanding  a  daily  tribul 
human  lives,  the  pitiless  vices  of  the  city-  -its  intemperane 
profligacy,  and  its  crime — destroy  their  hecatombs  of  victims 
every  year.     The  cunning  Circe,  Sin,  weaves  her  web  of    >phis- 
try  and  sings  her  siren  song,  and  flaunts  her  subtle  blandish- 
ments;  and  Pleasure,  that  Delilah  of  men' 
conscience  into  fatal  slumber,  robs  the  spirit  of  il 
betrays  its  victim   into   the  hands  of  the   Philistines.      The 
homeless  youth  in  the  solitude  of  a  great  city  pines  for  tl 
joyment  of  society.     The  only  sort   to  which  he  can  obtain 
access  is  frequently  that  of  the  theater,  the  billiard  parlor,  the 
drinking  saloon,  the  concert  hall,  or  the  haunts  of  still  «' 
resort,  whose  steps  go  down  to  death.     After  exhausting  men- 
tal or  physical  labor  he  seeks  relaxation  amid  the  multiplied 
seductions  on  every  hand,  which  have  all  the  charm  of 
and  some  of  them  the  additional  fascination  of  being  forbidden 
fruit.     He  frequently  procur  •  excitement  for  his  jaded  nerves 
and  overtaxed  brain  in  sensual  indulgence  in  thenar 
the  wine  cup.  or  the  more  subtle,  en ervati 
vices  which  despoil  both  soul   and  body  of  their  purity  and 
strength. 

It  was  for  the  spiritual  and  temporal  advanl 
of  young  men— to  shield  them  from  temptation,  to  n  scu<  I 
from  the  toils  of  evil,  to  raise  them  up  when  fallen,  to  fu 
Christian  -  icie  y  innocent  recreation  and  intelli 
and  for  religious  fellowship  and  evan  ort — that  t 

associati  :  '  '  ;•  !  :  im" 

portant  enterprise,  in    a  very  quiet,  am  nner. 

The  rivers  that  water  the  valleys  have  their  sprinj 
amonc  the  mountains,  or  in  soi  .;  sothisstn 


18C9J  Young  Main  Christian  Associations.  [r:\ 

of  hallowed  influence  had  its  humble  origin  in  one  of  the 
scure  by-ways  of  life.     Some  five  and  twenty  years  ago,  in  a 
drapery  house  in  the  heart  of  the  city  of  London,  a  :' 
men  assembled  in  a  prayer-meeting  for  the  promotion 
sona]  piety.     They  heard  of  a  similar  meeting  in  another  com- 
mercial house,  ami  invited  its  members  to  unite  with  tl 
A  meeting  of  young  men  from  both  houses  was,  therefore,  ; 
at  No.  72  St.  Paul's  Church-yard*  on  the  Oth  of  Ju 
where  it  was  resolved  to  form  a  "Society  for  improving  the 
spiritual  condition  of  young  men   engaged  in  the  drapery 
other  trade.-."     To  the  religious  character  of  th  i  n  it- 

founders  soon  added  the  idea  of  intellectual  improvement, 
for  that  purpose  established  libraries  ami  instituted  deb 
They  also  inaugurated  the  Exeter  Hall  lectures  to  young  men, 
which  have  since  become  famous  throughout  the  world.    Tl 
lectures  have  become  a  permanent  institution,  enlisting  much 
of  the  first  literary  talent  in  Great  Britain,  and  i  thou- 

sands to  their  delivery.     In  their  published  form   they  have 
reached  multitudes  throughout  the  English-speaking  porti 
the  world.     In  ten  years  an  aggregate  of  ,    .  lumes  waa 

sold,  and  since  that  time  probably  150,000  more.     Th    ! 
also  instituted  Sunday  Bible  classes, and  employed  it-  i  • 
in  general  Sunday-school  and  Ragged-school  work.    It  ado] 
a  regular  system  of  trad  distribution,  and  in  1851,  the  y< 
the  first  universal  exhibition,  its  members  distributed  no 
than  352,000  tracts  among  the  visitors  to  the  V, 
held    1,550   public   and    social    religion-   services    in    the    me- 
tropolis. 

In   December,  1S51,  the  first  Foung    Mi 
ciation  in  America  was  established  :■' 
on  the  29th  of  the  same  month  the  first  in  the  United 
the  city  of  Boston,  Ala--.     Similar  societies  rapidly 
in  New  York,  Buffalo,  Y<\ 

Francisco,  and.  elsewhere,  i"  the  number  of  twenty-five  In  two 
years.     The  felt  necessity  of  some  means  for  Lhe  intcrchai 
thoughl  and  opinion  led  to  the  calling  <>i'  the 
at  Buffalo,  X.  \  .. 
present,  and   a  voluntary   conl 

central  committee  and  annual  conventions,  whose  fun< 
*  Messrs.  G 


592  Young  Men's  Christian  Associations.     [October, 

however,  were  to  be  merely  advisory  in  their  character,     'i 
conventions  have  been  held  as  exhibited  in  the  following  table: 


Da*  1     .. 

1854 Buffalo,  N.  T. 


-     ■ 

25 


1855 Cincinnati,  0 62 CO 

1856 Montreal,  Ca 88 G7 

185? Richmond,  Va f.2 -  : 

1S5S Cliarli    I     .  .-    C 98 ]0T 

1859 Troy,  X.  V 231.....'.'.'.'.., 

I860 N  ;       128 20;> 

1861 New  Yoi k 43 

1!  '  ; Chicago,  D1 150 

1864 Boston,  Mass 136 

1865 Philadelphia,  Fa 220 192 

1 866 Ml ,! :,:. .  X.  Y 250 

1SG7 Montre  tl,  Ca 594 245 

1SGS Detroit,  Mich 502 613 

The  great  Rebellion,  though  it  threatened  the  verj  existence 
of  the  confederacy  of  associations,  was  really  the  occasion  of 
marvelously  developing  its  energy  ami  usefulne  3.     The  con- 
vention had  been  appointed  for  St.  Louis  in  the  spring  of  ] 
but  the  outbreak  of  the  war  prevented  its  meeting.     The  Com- 
mittee, therefore,  called  a  convention   at  New  York  in   the 
month  of  November  to  bee  if  the  agencies  of  the  i 
could  not  in  some  way  com,'  to  the  aid  of  the  country  in  thai 
fearful  struggle.     The  resull  was  the  formation  of  that  i. 
organization,  the  Christian  Commission.     All  the  world  1.: 
the  history  of  it.-  labors,  which  gleam  like  golden  broidery  on 
the  ensanguined  mho  of  war — like  the  silver  li:':  som- 

ber clouds  of  fate,  irradiating  the  gloom  of  battle  by  glin  ; 
of  the  heavenly  light  of  love  and  charity.     Th<  tfthis 

commission  carried  at  once  the  bread  that  peri 
bread  of  life,  ;;:.>i  healed  the  wounds  both  of  the  body  and  the 
soul.     The}  -  k  bade  to  life,  and  by  their  hallowed 

ministrations  quickened  in  the  soul  aspirations  for  thai  hi 
life  thai  is  undying.  Tin-  Christian  artillery  of  the  battli  I 
— the  coffi  supply  trains  of  the  Commissi* 

succored   many   a  wounded  warrior,  whose  brui 
deadly  enginery  of  war  1i::<1  well-nigh  crushed  to  <!  iath.    'I 
plum.  tian  chivalry  exhibited  a    i 

as  dauntless  often  as  his  who  lid  the  victorious  charge  or  cov- 
ercd  the  disastrous  retreat.      By  their  gentle  ministrations  to 


1869.1  Young  Mens  Christian  Associations.  598 

the  stricken  and  the  dying,  amid  the  carnage  of  the  battle-1 
and  in  the  hospitals,  they  have  laid  the  nation  under  < 
of  gratitude  whi  :h  si  01  Id  never  be  forgotten.  From  Novem- 
ber, 1861,  to  .May,  18G6,  this  Commission  disbursed  both  for 
the  benefit  of  the  patriot  soldiers  of  the  Union  and  for 
the  rebel  wounded  that  fell  into  our  hands  the  sura  of 
§6,291,107.     It  employed    \  gents,  working  without 

ompense  an  aggregate  of  185,502  days.      These  agents  held 
130,050  religious  services,  and  wrote  92,321  letters  for  il  ■ 
diers.     They  gave  away  1,466,748  Bibles,  (in  whole  or  in  part,) 
1,370,953  hymn  books,  8,603,434  books  or  pamphlets,  18,18! 
newspapers  and  magazines,  and 

tracts.  They  also  greatly  assisted  the  operations  of  the  Sa]  ' 
Commission,  which  expended  in  the  same  time  §4,924,048, 
making  an  aggregate  by  the  two  of  §11,215,155  poured  out  as 
a  freewill  offering  by  a  grateful  country  for  the  moral  and 
physical  welfare  of  its  brave  defenders.  The  world  had  never 
before  seen  such  an  example  of  colossal  liberality. 

During  the  Ions:  years  of  the  war,  when  the  nation  si 
convulsed  with  the  throes  of  a  mortal  agony,  the  confederacy 
of  associations  was  weakened  by  the  Loss  i>f  its  Southern 
members,  and  by  the  destruction  of  several  local  brand 
the  North,  but  now  has  more  than  regained  its  former 
strength.  There  are  now  in  America  five  hundred  and  thir- 
teen associations — more  than  in  all  the  world  besides— with 
probably  fifty  Hi  »nsand  m  i  i   I  LO  ■:  es  in  their 

libraries.     The   annual  conventions   are   OCCAS]  pedal 

interest.     The  inhabitants  of  the  city  where  they  are  held  i 
their  houses   in   hospitality,  the   pub 

crowded,  and  are  addressed  by  representative  men  from  dif- 
ferent parts  of  the  country.     In  the  ■ 
are  generally  confined  to  three  or  five  minutes,  thus 
variety    and    vivacity.      These    convchtii 
Christian  sympathy   of  the  communities  where  they  are  I 
and   stimulate  their  zeal  for  philanthro]  ' 
and   powerful  revivals  of 
they  leave  behind,  and  the  I 

The  following  an  '><  "'••  Chri 

•iations  thro  ighonl  the  world,  at  pr 
national  c  held  al   Paris  in    U    i  by  the 


594:  Young  Men's  Christian  Associations.       [October, 

latest  information  upon  the  subject  :  In  Great  Britain  I 
arc  ninety-five  associations;  in  the  colonics,  i 
twelve;    in   Holland,  one    hundred  and    four;    in  Belgium, 
eleven;  in  Germany,  seventy  ;  in  France,  fifty-four;  in  Switz- 
erland, ninety-five;  in  Italy,  live;  around  the  Mediterranean, 
five;    in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  five   hui 
fifteen ;    in   all,  nine   hundred    and    sixty-four.      The   II 
associations  are  af  Turin,  Genoa,  Naples,  Florence,  and  Milan. 
There  are  also  associations  at  Algii 

Smyrna,  and  Constantinople;    at  Madras  and    Calcutta;    in 
Australia,  New  Zealand,  and   Ceylon  ;    at  the  Ca] 
Hope,  at  Natal,  and   Sierra  Leone.     Besides  these,  then 
corresponding  members  at  St.  Petersbnrgh,   Buenos   Ayres, 
Honolulu,  and.    Bessarabia.      The    membership  of  the  conti- 
nental  associations  is  generally  small,   frequently   not  more 
than  ten  or  twenty.     At  Elberfeld,  however,  it  reaches 
hundred,  and  at  Berlin   five  hundred  and  twenty-six.      The 
largest  in  Great  Britain  has  three  hundred  members,  excepting 
that  of  London,  which,  with  it.-  eleven  branches,  numbers 
thousand  and  thirty-four.       In  America  they  are  much  la  _     . 
and  have  taken  a  deeper  hold  upon  the  popular  sympathies. 
That  at  Brooklyn  numbers  three  thousand  eight  hundred  and 
ninety   live   members;  that  at  New  York,  one  thoi 
hundred  and  fifty-two  :  or  together,  five  thousand  five  hui 
and   forty-seven.      The  as      iation    at   Philadelphia  has  two 
thousand  five  hundred  members;  that  at  Boston,  tw< 
three  hundred;  al  Providence,  one  thousand  three  bun 
at  Troy,  one  tin         ■  and  fifty  ;  and  at  Chi 

one  thousand. 

Thus  much  must  suffice  for  statistics.     We  will 
the  scope  and  tendency  of  these  as  ociati  <  >untry. 

One  effect,  we  conceive,  will  h 
business— to  prove  thai  i;  is  not  a  mere 
The  national  reproach  of  America,  whether 
is  its  intense  dollar  wor  hip  ;  its 
eager  race  for  riches,  in  which  all 

The  tendency  of  all  ihi-  i  '  and  hard- 

ening to  the  I 

reckless  extravagance  fo  tered  hy  the  Gold  Room  and  i 
Exchange   are  Bwl 


1869.]  Young  Me?iys  Christian  Associations.  595 

business,  when  ennobled  and  dignified  by  a  lofty  Christian 

principle,  will  become  a  high  and  holy  calling.     Thia  desirable 

consummation  will  vastly  increase  the  resourc     of  the  Church, 

and   will  unseal  fountains  of  liberality  which  will  water 

earth  with  the  streams  of  an  almost   boundless  benefio 

Men  who  early  acquire  the   habit    of  Christian   ac  ' 

of  systematic  giving,  when  with  the  la 

increase,    will   be   moved    by  that  second    nature,    which   is 

stronger    than    the    first,    to   liberally    endow    the    I 

institutions  of  the  country.     The  commercial  su 

tian  men  will  prove  what  seems  to  be  doubted,  that  religion 

does  not  spoil  a  man  for  business,  nor  make  him  a  men  mills 

sop  in  the   active  relatioi  bib;    and  tl  i  will 

carry  their   business    faculties    into  the   religious   ei 

of  the  Church,  and  give  th(  m  a  n<  w  efficiency  ai 

The  dissemination  of  Christian  principles  among  busii 
men  would  assuredly  elevate  the  political  tone  of  society,  and 
inspire  a  nobler  ethical  sentiment  in  all  classes.     Legi  lation 
would  be  recognized  as  the  highest  function   of  the  patriot 
statesman;  as  a  duty  to  be  performed,  not  in  thi  blind 

partisanship,  but  in  a  calm  judicial  frame,  and  in  humble  de- 
pendence upon  that  wisdom  which  cometh  from  above,  and  is 
profitable  to  direct  and  to  guide  into  all  truth.     S 
exercise  of  the  franchise  would  be  apprehended  as  a  solemn 
trust,  which  a  man   would  no  more  sell  for  go 
power,  than  he  would  sell  his  wife's  affection,  hi    ■' 
honor,  or  his  son's  integrity. 

There  are,  however,  some  dangers  into  which  tl 
tions  may  have  a  tendency  to  fall,  and  against  which 
be  well  to  guard.     There  is,  for  instance,  the 
active  spirits  becoming  to  rtivc,  and  being: 

pronounced  in  their  opinion 

sometimes  harsh  and  c<  nsorious,  in  their  judgments ;  ' 
zeal,  but  not   according  to  knowledge."     They  liav. 
mellowness  of  i 
of  charity,  wl  ' 
the  world.     But  thi 

presenc    an.  [>athy  of  those  who   have   • 

youth.     The  wisdom  of  Nestor  is  no  less  valuab) 
than  the  valor  of  Achilles  in  conflict. 


596  Young  Men 's  Christian  A,       '     ons.       [Oct 

Another  danger  is  tliat  of  falling  into  secularism  of  tone  in 
the  character  of  the  mee  tings,  tions, 

ami  amusements  of  the  associations.     Unless  due  provisii 
made  for  the  devotional  element,  it  is  apt  to  be  crowded  out 
by  business  discussions,  or  by  literary  or  social  cntertainm 
An  antidote  to  this  danger  is  found  in  the  practice  of  e<  ■ 
associations,  of  havin< 

themselves,   and.   as  much    as  possible,   by    committees,   and 
of  having  an  evening  set  apart  every  week  or  fortnight  for 
devotional  exercises.     The  classification  of  members 
and    associate,  the    former  of  whom  must  be  members    of 
some  Christian  Church,  i  icures  that  the  executive  of  tl.     i 
sociation  shall  bo  such  as  to  guard   against  undue  dang 
secularism. 

The  question  of  amusements  is  a  difficult  on  I  app]  iach, 
and  must  be  adjusted  to  the  varied  circumstances  of  the  dif- 
ferent associations.  That  which  would  be  appropriate 
crowded  city  would  be  unsuited  to  a  country  village.  In 
places  gymnasia  are  employed  to  furnish  opportunity  for 
athletic  exercises.  The}*  may  frequently  become  valuable 
auxiliaries  to  the  aim.-  of  the  institutions. 

Nothing  will  so  much  conduce  to  the  spiritual  well-beii 
a  proper  care  for  the  body.     A        '  may  often  do  much 

good  by  providing,  for  the  sedentary  classes  of  office-cl 
and  others,  an  opportunity  for  developing  a  "  muscular  Chris- 
tianity," and  quickening  their  sluggish  circulatiou  b 
atic  gymnastic  exercises.      But  billiards,  i  ikers,  ami 

other  mere  amusements,  have  also   been  advocated.      '' 
lurks  a  danger  in  their  adoption.      There  must   be  a  limit 
somewhere.     1)  these  be  admitted,  the  demand  may  be  n 
for  the  introduction  of  cards,  nine-pins,  fencing, 
Christian  Association   is  a  religious 
mere  secular  club.      Its  memb<  i  i  d  b\  the  holy  i 

of  Christ,  and  profess  t"  be  his  di  ciples.     They  should  I 
no  reproach    upon   thai   nam..'.     In   Germany, 
Christliche  Jun  erein  is  a  sort  <>!"  (.  hristian  club  for 

young  me    '  I  oth 

secular  character,  furnishing  board  and  I 
ing  instructors  in  Fi  ing, 

Jonirelinfs   Verbond  of  Ilollai 


1800.]  Young  Men's  Christian  Associabm   .  507 

tution.  In  America,  however,  these  secular  features  arc 
generally  avoided. 

in  the  patronage  extended  to  lectures,  readings        I        like, 
great  care  should  be  exercised.   The  endorsement  of  anj  enter- 
tainment by  these  associations  is  an  implied 
itb  character.     They  should,  therefore,  employ  only  such  lec- 
turers, and  permit  only  such  readings,  as  v.'ill  not  invali 
their  claims  to  be  judicious  caterers  to  the  intellect! 
of  the  Christian    public.     The   New   York   A  lias 

had  excellent  art  exhibitions  at  its  rooms.  It  has  also  provided 
for  its  members  a  course  of  lectures  on  physiology  and  the 
laws  of  health — an  example  worthy  of  imitation. 

The  presence  of  the  ladies  at  the  entertainments  of  th 
ciation  will    be   one  of  their  greatest   charms   and   stroi 
attractions.      Conversationes  and  musical  reunions  might  be 
arranged  for  this  purpose.     They  need  not  be  formal  cone 
but    occasions    for    social    singing,    where    c\ery    one    may 
.join  in  the  refrain.     Music  has  powerful  attractions  for  even 
the  coarsest  natures.      Witness  the  crowded  concert  halls  of 
our  great  cities.      In  New  York  alone  there  are  fifteen  hun- 
dred of  these  haunts  of  the  siren.      :^ 
offer  a  counter-attraction  by  instituting  occasi 
moral    and  religious  pieces,  the  stirring  anthems  and  revival 
melodies  which  form  such  a  noble  body  of  Christian  psaln 
These  "songs  of  Zion"  will  often  awaken  in  the  hardesl  heart 
thrilling  memories  of  home  and  childhood ;  and  with  their 
sacred  strains,  holy  lessons  will  glide  into  the  soul   tl 
barred  against  every  other  influence.    In  tins  matter,  esp(  cially, 
the  aid  of  the  ladies  is  necessary.     Without  their  —Her  v< 
the  music  will  be  rather  harsh.     Christian  women 
exert  a  powerful  influence  for  t 

The  question  has  been  asked,  What  relation  do 
ciations  hold  to  the    temperai  i  1     li  is  ''I11    rul 

some  Church  organizations  that  no  member  -"  •  sell, 

or  use  spirituous  liquors.     But  ether  Churches  do  not  h<  I 
strongly  pronounc*  d  opinions  upou 
1    "   i  to  ion  to  the  individui  : 

each  member,  and  let  all  work  unitedly  for  th 
of  the  association  \ 

The  relation  of  this  institution  to  tbe  Church  is  an  impor- 
Foubtu  Semes,  Vol.  XXI, 


598  Young  'Men*  Christian  Associations.      [< : 


tant  question".     Ii    is  not  tlie  rival  of  the  Church,  as  . 
have    supposed,    but    its    handmaid.      -Many   ministers    and 
Churches  at  firsi   looked  askance  at  thei  '  tions,  and 

turned  toward  them  the  cold  shoulder;  but  they  now  rej 
them  as  their  mosl  valued  allies.  The  greater  flexibilil 
their  organization  makes  them  most  facile  and  effective  in- 
struments by  which  the  Church  may  carry  on  much  im- 
portant evangelistic  labor.  They  are  to  the  Church  what 
arms  are  to  the  body.  They  also  utilize  a  large  amount  of 
energy,  now   lying  dormant,  by  employing  laj  .  and 

causing  that  energy   to  flow   through   a   grei  '    y  of 

channels. 

The  truly  catholic  character  of  this  institution   is  one  of 
its  most  admirable  attributes.      It  brings   the    most    ar 
spirits  of  the  different  Churches  into  intimate  relationshi] 
co-operation  with  each  other.      It  rubs  off  the  . 
intense  denominationalism,  and  cultivates  a  spirit  of  broader 
catholicity.     Cliristianity  is  something  nobler  and  more  com- 
prehensive than  any  of  man's  petty  issues,  and  in  some  c 
has  especial  facilities  for  working  when  freed  from  sectarian 
trammels.     In  certain  hinds  of  evangelistic  labor,  purely  non- 
sectarian  effort  disarms  prejudice,  and  is  free  from  every  pos- 
sible suspicion  of  prosclytism — a  liability  to  which   suspi 
frequently  defers  ministers  and  others  froD 
work.     Moreover,  the  non-professional  character  of  these  lay- 
services  renders  them  acceptable  to  a  c 
they  consider  the  perfunctory  visitation  of  the  regular  cl 
A^ain,  these  associations  will  form  a  sort  of  < 
for  recruiting  tk  if  tin   Christian  ministry.      They  fur- 

nish the  opportunity  for  the  exercis  3  of  Chrii  tian  activit;  . 
for  the  development  of  whatever  "gifts  and  gr  .  ecial 

aptness  for  the  work,  Its  meml  I      .     will 

be  of  infinite  service  b-.   1  labling  mi  n  tails 

of  social  evils,  without  which  u  ■  ■'»  be 

of  much  ava.il.     "  Thi  rthan  thil 

The  concn  more  than  the 

sight  of  a  wounded  or  dying  man  in 

than  the  report  of  a  thou  and  slain  in  battle.  It  was  his  inti- 
mate acquaintance  with  the  horrors  of  Bedford  jail  that 
kindled  John  Howard's  enthusiasm  iu  his  life-work  of  prison 


1869.]  Young  Men's  Christian  Associations.  500 

reform.      So   the  personal  contact  of  the  members  of  tl 
associations  with  the  various  forms  of  vice  and  end- 

ing in  great  cities  will  Lc  their  best  education  in  the  work  of 
practical  philanthropy  and  social  reform. 

The  associations  throughout  the  country  vigoi 
evangelistic  labor  in  street  preaching,  bet) 
tribution,   cottage    and    noon    prayer-meetings,  Bible    cli 
visitation  of  the  poor,  of  the   prisoner  in  the  jails  and  • 
soldier  in  the  barrack-room,  and   ministration    to  th 
dying  in  the  hospitals.     Their  members  literally  fulfill  th< 
mand  of  the  Divine  Master,  "  Go  out  into  the  highways  and 
compel  them  to  cone  iu.;J     In  New  York,  Chicago,  and  i 
large    cities,  they  go   to    the  saloons,  the  billiard-parlors,  the 
concert-halls,  to  the  very  borders  of  hell,  to  re  cue  their  ;' 
men  from  ruin.     They  visit   the  hotels,  the   boardiug-hoi 
the  workshops,  to  find  out  strangers  <  Dming  to  'be  city.     '.!  bey 
invite  them  to  their  room?,  inl  tl    m  to  Christian  I 

lies,  and  throw  around  them  the  arms  of  love  and  sym] 
to  shield  them  from  the  snare-  that  surround  the  pi 
sophisticated  youth  in  a  greatcity.     There  is  n  '   kind 

of  work.     In  every  city  there  are  young  men,  once  the  pri 
happy  homes,  who  are  making  shipwreck  of  their  lives 
going  down  to  death;  and  who  so  fit  to  put  forth  thehan  ' 
speak  the  word  as  young  men  like  theras 
by  common   hope,   and  sympathies;  young  men  whose 
hearts  God  hath  touched,  and  who,  full  i  thusiasm  of 

their  early  zeal,  yearn  to  bring  their  erring  brothers  to  the  path 
of  virtue. 

These  associations,  area  sort  of   Christian  police,  watching 
over  the  spiritual  inti 
or  useful  what  were  otherwise  i 
mon  weal.     Its    members    are  the    good    Samariti  i 
friendless  strangers  who   have   fall< 
plunderers  who  prey  upon  their  fellow-men.     I 
seval  order  of  the    C 
bound   by  no  convcntui  I 
of  want    and  i 
them.     Their  . 

cholera  at  Nev  Orleans,  and  ..i';1.'  yellow  fever  a!    N 
Virginia,  will  nev^r  be  forgotten  by  those  who 


600  Yoimg  Men's  Christian  Associate  [July, 

Their  work  among  the  firemen  of  Philadelphia  was  productive 
of  great  and  permanent  good.' 

Many  of  their   financial   undertakings  are  "  enterprises  of 
great  pith  and  moment."     The  association  rooms  in  the  large 
cities  arc  frequently  noble  and  costly  buildings.     In  Chii 
they  erected  a  magnificent  marble  hall  which  would  seat  I 
thousand  five  hundred   persons,  at  the  cost  of  a  quarter  i 
million  of  dollars.     It  was  no  sooner  completed  than  i 
burned  to  the  ground;  but   before  the  ruins    had  ceased  to 
smoke  $125,000  were  subscribed  for  the  erection  of  another, 
which  has  since  arisen,  phcenix-like,  from  the  ashes  of  its  pred- 
ecessor.    In  1SG7  that  association  circulated  one  hundred  and 
ninety  thousand  tracts.     They  received  a  donation  at  one  time 
of  ten  tons  of  tracts  for  distribution  from  Great  Britain.    The 
Boston  Association  spends  SS,000  a  year,  and  that  of  Brooklyn 
814,000  a  year,  in  Christian  effort.     The  Executive  Committee 
at  Xew  York  publishes   a  spirited    quarterly  in  the  general 
interests  of  the  associations,  which  has  a  self-sustaining  circula- 
tion of  two  thousand. 

There  are  at  leas!  fifty  thousand  young  men  in  Ameri 
and  probably  as  many  more  in  Europe,  who  are  thus  hound 
together  in  a  blessed  brotherhood,  to  toil  in  the  service  of  the 
Divine  Master  for  the  spiritual  welfare  of  their  fellow-men : 
young  men  who  occupy  positions  of  honor,  of  tru  i,  of  influ- 
ence, and  who  will  control  much  of  the  financial,  and  political, 
as  well  as  religious  destiny  of  the  age:  a  noble  band  of 
Christian  workers,  true  Boldiers  of  the  holy  cross,  knight 
a  loftier  chivalry  than  the  !  warrior-  of  old  I     I 

their  banners  is  inscribed  the   sublime    watchword,    "Christ 
for    all  the  world,    and  all    the  world    for   Christ!"     ] 
purpose,  to  hasten  the  time    when  npon  wrvy  industry  and 
activity  of  Iwll  be  written  "Holim  rd  ;" 

and  when  the    sin-stricken    world,    like  the  demoniac  out  of 
whom  wer<    «••■  -:   ,;  levils,  shall  sit  clothed  and  in 

its  riarht  mind  at  die  f  el  of  C 


18G9.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


C01 


Akt.  vn.— foreign  religious  IXTl-LLK 


PEOTESTAKTISK. 

GREAT  BRITAIN. 
The  Disestabi  •  Irish 

;  !b  ■  .  .     ' 

for  the  aboli  I  tl 

Ireland,  the  full  history  of  which  has 
:  irubcrsof 
the  "Methodist  Qviartei 
an  end.     In  the  I 
majority  with  which  it  v. 

'     •'.     ■ 
'.'.'-■ 
House  in  all  important  r 
as  it  v.  as  wl 
In  the  Ho 

ingof  the  bill  was  (June  19)  :•  trrii  1,  in  a 
house  of  300  i 
pairs,  by  a  majority  of  33.     T 

aber  than  the  mini 
selves  pr  ibabl;  when  the 

.'  the  bill  came 
in  the   work  of  destruction 

began.     By   a  number  of   am 
the  Lords  endeavoi  ;d 
tial  endowment  out  of  the  wi 
ecclesiasti 

by  the  Archbishop  of  Canter- 
:  in  moving 
three  millions, 
thought    a    modesi  ni    for   the 

Church  ■ 
new  mission.     W 

i  wn    to   the    I ' 
they   v.  ere    received   with    il 
■■ 

therej  : 

even  those  which  I 
I      .-        I  led  in  form 
When  the 
to  the  Hon 
l 

No) 
.;  I 
I 
'■'■  ''  '       ■ 

thej 

tl  ■  • 

the  in>t  divi 
minist  r  i 
further  p 

■ 
withdrawn.     A  I  Couji  il,  how- 


- 
. 

lives,  while  the  disposal  of  the 
the  dis- 
cretion of  Goven 

. 
ment.     Tl 
suit,  of  an 
\ 

wh 
adopted   by  the 

• 
olio  and  Presbyterian  as  well  as  in  the 

first  made  in  committee  by  the  Duke  of 

moved  as  a  "  rider,"  si 

and  v.-.'.s 
I 

. 
pport  of  i 
bj    Earl    B  .    may  be 

■ 
the  Marquia  oi'  Salisbu 
startling  was  it  to  lind  I 
ported  by         two  Ai 

\ 

Mr.    ■ 

■ 
leated  without  a  debate  or    ■ 

■• 
erumeul  . 

. 

-  which   the  Lords  (  : 

i 


602 


Foreign   Religious  Intdli 


[October- 


in  accordance  with  the  ] 
pr<  i  aU  '    our  country. 

EOMAU  CATHOLICISM, 
The  cojnxG  Co  sen      Thci 
hardly  an)  doubt 
ical  Com  :i  y  the  T 

me   .  a    : 

1869.    From  all  ]    n  s  of  1 
Bishops   of  i  itholic   Com-  j 

inn-.;  n  have 

in  the  Council,  in  accordance  with  tho  i  s> , 
press  command  of  the  Pop  .  ai  I  if  may 
be  regarded  as  certain  thai   the  i 
of  those    who   will   be   absent   will  be 
small.     The  interest  in  tho  subject  con- 

n  v 
it  nir,y  already  I 
noEiV:         of  the  1 

be  present,  and  aoProi  t,  on  this 

occasion,  the  C  Rome. 

Since   we   •.  .'  '■•   the   article   •  ■ 
Council  in  the  ] 

"Met!  ;;   few 

more  replies  ries  of 

the  Greek  Church,  as  the  Pal    archs  of 

• 
lisLi-d.    They  fully  accord  with  the  tenor 

of  the 

othei  Pati 

Chun 

the  to 

Th 

appears  to  : 

i        tiom  of  the   Pope  I    i 

Greek.      In    the    last    a  n 

"Quarte  lj   R<  rii  is  " 

Armenian  Pi 

Bogo 

that  he  would  1 

Bubji  utthel 

the  Ei 

the  mon 

Russia     The 

WhoS      :     ' 

been    publi: 

"  Ararat        J 

It  has  1 

justi 

p] 

n 

1 

but,  in  considering  the  1 

ho  I:    i 

■ 

cam*  • 

1 

oftl 


the  aspiratio  1  of  tl     &  •  •  f 

.  with 
canoi 

■ 
■ 

proclaims  th<    tl  bo  the 

y— a  doctrii 

I 

j   the 

■ 
with  the   oth  r  E  isl  .  "our 

L  Of  I         ■ 

to  the 

: 

Vicars-i  I  of  the  ' 

not  to  give  place  I 
and  dis 

of  tho  "  Civilta  Cathol- 

i  ■  i,"  the  • n  of  tho 

■ 
y 
the  invitation  of  the  P 

■ 
paper  th  1 

;' 
I 

of  I 

travl 

I 

'   I 

I 


1869.] 


Foreign  Religious  J< 


C0'4 


duringthe  lasi  thi 
totheCouucil.    A  few  !    i 
in  Europe  have   pa!      In  \  ■ 

stating   the  reasons 
no  union  between  El 
Protestants.     Dr.  C 
has  written  a  letter  to  the 
Westminster,! 
bo  p  -  nil 

pelical  Protesl  ntism  in  I 
Rome;  and  vvl 
thai  he  was  no    autlio 
question,   Dr.   Curai 
same  q 

expressed    his    read  to  i  ppear  in 

Rome  if  permi  -'   n 
cil  shall  be  given  to  liim. 
Churoh  historian,  Merle  d 
written  a  letti  r1 

well-known    i  emb  i    ol    the    House  of 
Oi  mm  ms    in  \  ...  h  he 
estant    world   to   resume   the 
Reformation  wli  ;re,  i        >  see 
the  sixteenth  century,  it  was  unfortu- 
nately interrupted.    Hej 
Protestant  Ch 
make  provision  to 
December,    I860  — the    di 
Council  will    be  o] 
services,  iu  which  points  like 
ing  be  d  scuss      :  ■' 
head  of  the  Church;  tl  e  w 
sole  ■   : 

the    righteousness  of  Chri 
ins     i!  of  w«  rks  n  id  sup  i  ;:'i> 
moui  3 ;   relig  liberty,  in   tl 

of  the  syl 

the  plac  s  of  m  - 

He  also  recomi  !  I 

the  enlightenment  of  those  who  - 
und  t  the  ; 
not  esi      ' 

Catholic  nations  will  soon  join  the  I  rot- 
estam  Chi 
a  true  Chri: 
Church   of   ; 
Jewish  elem 
resumeinil  the  pi 
belongs,     i  :  ■ 

the  •■  New  Bvai       seal  Chui      i 
of  Berlin   in 
the  ovan  reli     '  i 

ci  I  C     isten 

- 

iufid  I 

nroa,:,.        •• 
Cath  i       ' 
andha     I 


-and  the  numl 

rully 

■ 

: 

I 
of  the  Pope  I 

I 

- 

I 
: 

■ 
whe  at  pn    :ni 

erallj   I ' 
Roman 

i 
I 

■ 

■ 

I 


604 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


[October, 


said  to  have  i 

end  '.villi  con  ideral  i       Car- 

dinal is  l 
will  not] 

and  tlii  t         still  •  give  calming 

assurances  « iih  i 
of  the  Council.     I '. 

dared  that  the  m  ijority  ol   tin    French 
Bishops    des  re   pea 
and   will   not    encourage    any   exi 
I  jndencies.     But  whether 
liberal  attitude  of  the   French    Bis       • 
will  be  fulfill  may  be  con- 

sidered as  certain  that, 
majority  of  th 

at  kast  read  ews  of 

Rome,  and  will  c  n  in  any 

i:  ing  the  Pope 

claimed    by   the  d  in  any 

resolutions   that  may  b  ■  o 
will  be  nee  ou 

the  part  ol  i    ■  i 

A  Lr  more  forniii  tion  than 

among    the     I 

the  lean        Lh      ogiani 
of  the  ' 

lie  world  have  nev(  n  ir  dis- 

satisfaction  with   tin     prii 
Papal  Syllabus  of  1SC1.      Many  are  in 
open     rebel  Church. 

Some  men  of  (      i 
the  I 

lau,  who  I       year  joi 
Church  ;  Dr.  i 

Professor  at  the  Unh  -     I 

whoseveral  5 ear?  ago wa  '    I  ] 

of  Mentz,  but  not  Pope; 

Dr.  Pichler,  tl 
0:1   the  s  jparalion   b 
Catholic  and  the  Gi  -■■   w!io 

has  accepted  a  1    II 

.     :.        [y    to  job 

A  glan 
lo 

other  couutrii  • 
and  al 

at  the  amieip  il 

The  literary  d>  '      !  >-  of  Papal  ii  : 
ity.  and  of  other  like  nl  ramoi  lam    • 
even  if  they  are  Ai 
champs  of  M  ■  Kol- 

tel  r  ol  :■'.  111 
by  so 

lion  of  the  | 
■■    I 

on  qi    3ti( 

Pope  wo  ild  b  ■  I 

for  cor  dealt  to  I 

1    ' 


Among   the 
i-vi  it  country  of  I  urope  I 
wli  1  secretly  arc  dissatisfied   wit 

> 

I     1 

have    , 

will  en  liether 

may  carry  with   them  a  nui 
liberal    laity, 

.    by    name.     Che 
:     1  nui 
which  the  Catholic  ] 

- 

indi- 
wh'.cli 

oflayni  1 
int-iit   of  ultrai 

tiou  of 

and    ulira-P 
pursue. 

on  qu 

tween  the  lioverumi  1  Tho 


1868.] 


Foreign  Religious  Intelligence. 


605 


proposition  did,  ho 

much  approval.     The  first  to  reply  was 

the  Prou  stant    '  llor  of         l 

Hungai 

In  fuU   accordance  with  the  \ 

ciples  wiiich     have     governed 

during  the  last  eig        a  i        lis,  Austria 

v  ill  n  -  i  .       le  at  all 

tical  question,  but    wait  until    il   le  rus 

the  action  of  the  Council.     Th    i,   ;    l 

present  liberal   ruiui  ;trj 

power,  it  will  know  how  to 


I 
is  likely  that  i 
■ 

; 
movement  in  Ei  i 
separation  I 

i  i 
lomoi 

tries  th.iu 
any  previous  event. 


Art.  Yin.— FOREIGN  LITERARY  INTELLIGENCE. 


GERMANY. 
The  able  work  of  Dr.  J.  F.  A.  Mticke, 
on  the  Life  and  of  Emperoi  Julian 

the  Apo  T   •  ,  is  :ompl       Ibyi 
am  e  of      -    •      ■    '    volume.     (J 

:  1869. 
The  author  holds  evangelical  views,  as 
appears  from  Arian- 

ism,  but  he  co  torical 

truth   to  give   an   even  more   fa\ 
s]  .-,  •  :.   of  th  ■  chari  cter  of  Julian  than 
Q-ibb  ....     Ho    d  nies    thai     Julian    can 
properly  be  called   . 

never  i  ■■■  I  baptisi  i.  He  by 
strong  argum  >nts  refutes  ti  e  report  of  a 
,.■:_.    ■  ti      of  I      istianity  by  Julian. 

The  •  . 
C  i  New  Testament,  by  F 

or  Ti 
i  . 

the  R  • 

editioti  o    fis       ndorf  \ 
dinal   M  ii,  ;■ 
and   1859.    I  I 

Va  ica    '.     L  '.      .     18G9.)     Ti 
show  5  ( irrtctcd  the  • 


of  Mai 


more    than    four    hundred 


ITALY. 


The  national  i  of  Italy  has 

given   o    new  impuls 

- 
phcr,  S  tlvalor 

!;sof 

! 
Berlin,  )  B68.)     This    i 

ment  of  Tur- 
in all  the  Ital  •  . 

ol  tho 
country,  «  b  • 

■ 

■ 
:  y  a  return  to 


Art.  IX.-SYNOP8IS  OF  THE  QUi  '  ffl  uF 

THE 

Am*  ■  '     '    '  ■ 

^MBRtOAS      '  S    REVIEW,     I 

h?s  Critic* 

3   I  . 

Ti  ■  Historical  i 

J;  ■ 


606  Synopsis  of  tie  Quarterlies,  and         [Oci 

Sa<  ra.  July,  1869.     (Andover.)— 1.  The  Natural 

Science.    2.  The  I    ,  of  Nescience;  or,  Hai  i 

lous  Thought.     ;;.  Dai  -  of  the   Apocalypse   from    h 

]  nglish  "\  crsion  of  the  New  Test 

Lebanon. 
Christian  Quartern,  July,  1869.    (Cincinnati.)— 1.  1 

ism.     2.  ]         '  e.    ::.  Harmony  of   the  Bible  ai 

Spiril  of  Ri  -      i    o, 

Sins.     G.  Thi  Life.     t.    Myi  I 

Woman's  Rights.     8.   A]  o:  Lotical 
Evangelical   Qi  r    Review,  July,  ]  )     ;    - 

Presence.      2.  Tl  i    toys.    3.  The  ft'ill     4!    R  minis     1         of  Li 

isters.     5.TheL     I's  i    |  pi  r.     1    ]       l  1    ,urch.     7.  The  I 

ony  and  Lutlx  ran  Church  in  Mi 

Publication  Society. 
Meecj  ksbi  rg  R  July,  1!  69.     (Phil;  ">  Iphia.) — 1.  The  YTritl 

Incarnate  Wi  2.     retch  of  the  History  of  the  En 

Beginnings  of  the  Chri  tian  Church.  .  foi    j   am  1 

Ascendi  d  to  My   !'■  ll  ■  r."     5.    Psychologic   W         I 

the  History  and  Poci         of  the  1  ill.     C    Gem  m    : 

for  the  American  Church,     ?.  Infidelity.     8.  TheChui 

Union. 
New  Exglaxder,  July,  1S69.     (Nov    Haven.)— 1.  The    Rel 

2.  The  An  Public.     3.   R 

gery  in  Pol  ;  us  of  the  Jesuits.     6.  M01 

Romanism.     6.  The   i '  ban  a  Qu 
North  American  Review,  July,  1869.  •-    I .  ]  '  .  2.  A 

CI  ■  pter  of  Erie. 

gland.     S.  Op  Gi  Culture.     6.    Hi  R  »u  q        .     v. 

Laws  of  History.    8.  Volcanoes. 
PRINCETON'  Rj  view,  July,    I 

fineness.     2.  2  Rev.  J 

and  Middle  Egypt.     1.  Pai  ibles  of  the  Kingdom— Matthew 

oral  .'  I  of  the  Late 

sition  and  I : 
Hsu  er£  ■.:  ■•  c  I  ■■  ■■  July,  1869.       I  I  -    I.  '. 

tory,  the    J"  Di\  ino   Aulh         . 

o.  '! :.    ;..  -lit.    ■;.  Biblii  ] 

pars  tivc  Myi  .  God. 


English  Ri  vi 

British  ant    i  July,  18G9.     (Lond 

Ext  /■  lical  licanism  in    [n 

3.  The  La  to  Conn 

son's  luti  • 

Pr<  - 

8.  Rel'igion 

British  Q 

Com  tho  Middle  / 

Con  1 1  ■ 

Light.     6.  B 
1  m       :■■  11  '■ 
Worl  3  of  <  •  : 

Jacqi    mi  nt'     i    ' 


1869.]  Others  of  the  higher  Periodi 

Guide.     6.  Mrs.  Somerville  on  .'■' 
S.  Freemau  I  the  Norman  I 

10.  The  Marriage  La  •:  of  the  Empire, 
Loxdos    Q    ...    ■>     Review,    July,  1869.     (London.)— 1. 
!     - 
cf  Psychology.     4.  Cosiu 

view  of  the    Abyssiuian  Expedition.     7.    Norway. 
Chri 

Westminster  Review,  July,  18G0.    (X-. 
Refori   .     2.  The  1 

ents,  Pal  Public,     5.  Mr.  C 

lal  Health. 

NOB   H    Bl  .  n, iv,  July.   ]  :.!.!! 

Lif 

Morals,     t.  Geological  1  5.  D  — ] 

moirof  Sir  Willi  n  Bi 

Sj      -    L     .:  .-.     :■    ' 

The  article  on  Geological  Time  is  very  important  in  its  1 

upon  the  theory  of  human  "development  by  natural  selection.3 

Our  readers    are  aware  that  geology,  revealing  no  transitional 

fossil  forms,  furnishes  a  .strong  contradiction  to  thi 

■win  replies  by  affirn  ing  that  scientific  geologj  hi 

a  fragmentary  share  of  the  vast  amount  of  pasl 

He  claims  imme  i  I e  ages  of  geological  time  of  win 

ontological  record  exists.     J>ut  Sir  William  '•  hi  -  >1iowii 

ample  reason  from  natural  philosophy  for  denying  that  the  i 

amount  of  geological  ages  can  he  more  than  one  hundred  millions 

of  years.     For,  1.  Go  back  that  amount  of  ti 

mass  of  melted    matter.     2.  The  tidal   influence  of  the  mi 

retarding  the  earth's  rotary  motion,  minutely  ind 

tainly,  that  go  back  a  hundred  mil  trs  and  the  earth  must 

have  rotated  so  very  fast  as  to  1 

3.  So  rapidly  does   the  sun  .  i  od  diniini 

that  go  back  mure  than  a  hundred  million  j 

great    a  solar  heat   for   animal   life.      All    this  • 

rigid  unifoi  rips  Darwinism 

Butthe  Revi  »w  ing  verj  • 

threatening  a  still  more  decisive    fatality:  "  *V< 

sidcrable  pr  ,  say  thai  natural  phil< 

to  a  period  of  some  ten  or  Ji 

can    be  allowed   for  the  j   . 

tolo  fist;  and    that  it    is   not  unlikely  that, 

mental  data,  this  period  may  be  Btill 

.  , 
this  greal  q  i<  a  hardly  yel 

ami    its    future  prog  cb   v  itli  the  phj 

ri 


COS  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  a  [October, 

The  article  on  the  Earl]  History  of  Man  maintains,  in  accord- 
ance with  the  views  of  the  Duke  of  Argyll  in  his  Primeval 
that  without  invalidating  Scripture  history,  we  must   rej  ct  the 
chronology  deduced  from  Scripture,   and  maintain  an  imn 
antiquity  of  man,  of,  say,  twenty  th  >u  .His  argi 

are  very  much  the  same  as  those  of  Dr.  J.  P.  Th 
in  our  Book  Tahle,  drawn  from  Egyptology,  Chinese  and  [ndian 
archeology,  and  language.     They  appear  powerful,  but  not,  per- 
haps, conclusive. 


German  fit  vit  ws. 

Studied  dxd   Kritike*.      (Essays    and    Reviews.)     1869.      Fourth    Jfi 
Essays:    1.  Betschlag,   Biographical 
2.  Brcckser,  On  the  Re] 
x.  24,     ::.  Koin  i  ■;.  The  Roman  La       md  tl      I 
Remarks:  1.  Vol:     The  Christian  Church  < 

Esoteric  Religion.     R •.   I.   D    L/AGarde's  Genesi 

Questiones   h  sbraie   .    i    .  iew<  I  by  Ki  2.  I 

Johaunis  (Revelation  of  John)  reviewed  by  Weiss. 

The  recent  war  between  England  and  Abyssinia  made  the  I 
country  a'subject  of  special  study  on  the  part  ofanuniberc 
scholars  who  accompaui<  d  the  English  expedition  either  as  mem- 
bers of  the  army  or  as  travelers  for  scientific  pur]  '< 
eratnre  which  lias  been  published  by  these  men  is  very  vol 
and  is  of  great  interest,  not  only  for  the  friends  of  history  and 
geography,  but    also  for  the   theologian;   i'nv   cot   onl)    is    the 
Abyssinian  or  Ethiopian  Church  more  i                 ated  of  in  all  tin- 
recent  works  on  Abyssinia,  but  a  number  of  works  I 
sively  or  chiefly  of  the  religious  affaii                    ■uniry.     Ai 
the  works  of  this  <■' ■                 ice,  Flad  (German  mis 
Abyssinia)  Zicolf  Jalxn  in    ibyssiniu,  etc.,  (] 
history  of  King  Theodorus  and  of  the  Protestant  mis 
his  government ;  a  work  by  the  same  aut hoi   on  the  '•'. 
black  Jews  of  W  ;    sinia. 

Itwas  a  hap]>y  idea  on  the  part  of  the  author  of  ■ 
above  articles  to  colled   all  the  information  published  iu  i 
works   on   the    Abyssinian    Church.      This   church    h 
awakened  a  peculiar  interest  throughout  the  Chri  A 

number  of  highly  importanl  apoerypl 
tian  or  carl]    i  liristian  period,  which  hitherto  wei 
having  been  who  :  ■  nocb, 

the  Jubilees,  the  Ascension  of  Jesaiah,  hi  ly    becomo 

known  to  us  for  the  first    time  in   ! 


1869.]  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  COO 

Church  historians,  like  Werner  (Die  Abyssin.   !.'  /■'<•- 

schHftfurd.  gesammte  Kath.  Theologie,  1852)  :  .  |  G  - 

schiefite der ICirohl.  Trennungmoi  dent.     31u- 

nich,  IPC  i,)  place  the  origin  of  the  Abyssinian  Church  in  the  h 
est  antiquity,  the  former  even  at  the  close  of  the  tury  of 

the  Christian  era,  arid  according  to  Stanley  (Too  Eastern  Chi 
it  breathes  an  atmosphere  of  the  Eas1  and  of  antiquity  which  is  not 
to  he  found  in  any  of  the  oilier  Churches  of  the  East.     As  it  ap- 
pears to  he  highly  probable  that  the  Abyssinian  Church  will  ere- 
long he  brought  into  living  contact  with  other  bran< 
Christian  Church,    wo  give  the  most  interesting 
article. 

Like  the  Copts,  with  whom  they  agree  in  n  their 

doctrine  and  practice,  the  Abyssinians  circumcise  theii 
on  the  eighth  day  after  their  birth  ;  the  bo; 

the  fortieth  day,  the  girls  on  the  eightieth  day  after  their  birth. 
The  child  receives  a  name  at  the  circumcision.     In  i 
with  a  remarkable  custom  ofth  most  ancient  Church,  the 
Binians  give  to  the  newly  baptized  milk  ami  honey.     Baptism  is 
performed  in  a  little  lake,  which  for  (hat  purpose  i 
the  church  to^er-;  the  candidates  for  baptism  being  I 
immersed,  and  baptized  in  the  name  of  the  Father,  and 
and  the  Holy  Ghost.     Previous  to  baptism,  the  d 
the  body  an"  anointed  with  the  sacred  oil,  in  all  thirty-six  ti 
acustom  which  i-  believed  to  be  related  t«.  the  old    : 
belief  that  thirty-six  demons  have  divided  among  thcmselv 
different  parts  and  limbs  of  the  human  body.     Adults  after  bein 
anointed  raise  up  the  right  hand,  and  turning  toward  th« 
swear  oil'  Satan,  or  the  prince  of  \  then,  turnii 

the  east,  or  the  sun  of  righteousness,  they  repeal  the  eonl 
of  the  Christian  faith.     Then  th< 
Christina  in  the  thirty-six  different  parts  of  the  body. 
custom  at  the  Abyssinian  baptism  is  the  clol 
baptized    1-:],  children  and  adults,  with  the  n 
five    feet  lon<     of   blue   sill:,  which    all 
constantly  we°ar  to  distinguish  them  from   the 
The  priest,  after  performing  the  ad  of  baptism, 
the  sacred  oil,  makes  by  m< 
person  baptized,  and  then  ti(     them  to  hi 

Baptism,  as  in  the  ancicnl  Church,  waa  followed  by  th< 
diate  reception  of  the  Lord's  Supper,  not  only  on  ll 
adults  hut  also  on  the  part  of  children,  to  whom  the  | 
with  his  finger  a  drop  of  wine  from  the  -acred  cup  into  which  a 


010  Synopsis  of  the  Quarterlies,  and  [October, 

little  piece  of  the  consecrated  bread  has  been  cast.  Thenceforth 
the  children  receive-  the  Lord's  Supper  from  their  tenth  to  their 
twelfth  year,  after  which  age  an  Abyssinian  rarely  receives  the 
Lord's  Supper  until  he  reaches  about  the  fortieth  year  of  his 

The  Abyssiniansj  like  the  Copts,  count  the  day  from  ev 
to  evening,  and  begin  the  year  in  the  fall  with  the  autu 
nox.     They  celebrate,  besid        ;      l    nday,  also  the  Jewish 
bath,     The  church  can  he  approached  only  with  bare  feet.     They 
spend  the  night  from  Saturday  to  .Sum. lay.  as  well  as  the  i 
preceding  the  festival  of  a  saint,"  in  the   church.     The  Lord's 
Supper  is  distributed  before  sunrise,  except  on  fast  days,  when  it 
is  distributed  at  three  o'clock  in  the  afternoon,  in   order  n 
interrupt  the  fasting.     The  priests  receive  it  daily,  th<  |  eople  on 
Sundays.     At  least  five  priests  (or  deacons)  mm  nt   at 

its  distribution.  The  Abyssiuians  do  nol  kneel  at  divine  service, 
but  remain  in  a  standing  posture,  and  when  they  arc  tired  lean 
on  a  kind  of  crutches.  During  the  service  they  frequently  bow, 
and  they  also  accompany  it  with  singing  and  dancing.  On  enter- 
ing the  church  they  kiss  (he  threshold.  The  kissing  of  -. 
objects  in  general  is  regarded  as  so  essential  that  tead  of 
"going  to  church,"  it  is  common  to  say  "to  kiss  the  church,"  and 
that  a  religious  man  is  frequently  called  a  "church  kisser." 

The  Lord's  Supper  is  administered  in  both   S]  id    the 

Abyssinians  are  the  only  Christian  sect  in  which  not  only  the 
bread  hut  also  the  v  ine  for  the  Lord's  Supper  is  |  ithin 

the  walls  of  the  church.  The  bread  is  leavened,  of  the  finest 
wheat,  and  is  baked  by  specially  appointed  church  bakers  with 
great  care  in  an  oven  in  the  church  premises.  It  has  the  shape 
of  round  cakes  of  middh  size,  is  marked  with  a  cross  in  thi 
of  a  luman  X,  and  must  always  be  fresh.  Only  on  the  fifth  day 
of  the  holy  week  unleavened  bread  is  used  in  commemoration  of 

:>:na  of  Christ,  and  in  general  the  whole  of  the  Jewish  I 
over  is  obnerved.     The  wine  is  prepared  from  raisins,  which  are 
preserved  m  the  •  sauctuary.     The)  are       I  ir  ten 

days  in  w 'iter,  then  they   are  dried  and  .vine 

thus  gained   is  mixed  at    the  communion  with  \.  A 

peculiarity   of  the    Ethiopian  mass,   which   is 
Coptic  liturgy,  is  the  prayer  for  the  dead,  (< 
which  immediately  succeeds  the  absolution;  it    ; 
Werner  as  a  reli  antiquity.     To  ihc  inv< 

Holy  Spiril  i  for  evermore,"  i  ncr  infers 

that  the  prayer  ii    nol   for  a  transubstantiation  •  i  cnts, 

but  for  the  perpetuation  of  the  eueharistii 


1869.3  Others  of  the  higher  Periodicals.  Gil 

sacramental  presen  e  of  the  Lord  in  the  Church.     After  the  con- 
secration of  the  bread  the  people  exclaim,  "Amen,  amen;  we 
believe  and  arc  certain  this  is  truly  thy  body,"  and  after  Ihi 
secration  of  the  wine,  "Amen,  this  is  truly  thy  body,  v, 
Werner  regards  these   exclamations  as  a  relic  of  th 
Ethiopic  liturgy.     The  words  used  on  administering  the   b 
are,  "This  is  the  bread  of  life,  which  has  descended  from  heaven; 
truly  the  precious  body  of  Emanue]  our  God  ;"  and  on  adminis- 
tering the  cup,  "This  is  the  cup  of  life,  which  hasdescende  I 
heaven,  which  is  the  precious*  blood  of  Christ."     Ae 
rule,  only  the  cli  i :  ive  bread  and  wine  separately ;  to  the 

laity  a  piece  of  consecrated  bread,  dipped  an  inthewine; 

is  given  in  a  spoon. 

Whether  the  Abyssinian  Church  believes  in  transubstauti: 
lias  been  a  controverted  point  eve  r  lolf  w  rote  1. 

works  on  the  language,  literature,  and  religion  of  the  Ethio] 
One  of  the  best  informed  Protestant  missionaries  who  have  La- 
bored in  Abyssinia,  the  present  Bishop  Gobat  of  Jerusalem,  says 
that  the  Abyssiniaus  call  the  consecration  of  the  bread  and  the 
wine  at  the  Lord's  Supper  "  Melaw  at,"  (change,)  and  that  such 
expressions  as  "change  it  into  thy  body,   change  il    i 
blood,"  frequently  occur  in  the  Ethiopic  liturgi 
mg  their  belief  they  usually  said  that  the  na1 
wine  is  not  changed;  that  both  remain  what   they  were  1 
that  whoever  partakes  of  them  in  faith  receives  with  I 
Christ  ;  and  that  therefore  they  call  thebodj  and  ated 

cup  the  blood  of  Christ.     The  author  of  th 
Studien  (Vol/)  thinks  many  expressions  in  the  liturgi 
takably  indicate   an  "incipient"    belief  in    transubstauti 
more  than  this  is  not  claimed  even  by   Roman  Catholic  \  ri 
like  Werner. 

The  wine  with  which  the  priosl   cli  cup  he  tin 

and  his  hands  he  does  not  dry.     He  i 
of  the  sanctuary;  the  people  walk  up  to  him,  h. 
Puts  and  gives  them   hi     blessi  !      I 

stands  a  clergyman  with  a  round  Baucer  containing  uiic< 
wafers,  ol   which  he  giv.i  ■   ■ 
divine  service.  , 

Of  special  intcresl   i 
Tabol    an  imitation  of  the  arl;  of  covenant.     Th. 
j,llv  exceptions,  are  round,  and  have,  like  the  niesquid*  of  the 
Falashas,  after  the  i  i  temple  in  Jerusalem, 

ions:  the  vestibule,  the  sanctuary,  and  the  holj   of  holi<  ,.    The 


612  Synopsis  of the  Quark'  [Oc! 

Abyssinians  believe  thai  the  genuine  Mosaic  ark  <»f  tlie  covenanl 
is  still  in  the  church  of  Asum,  the  ancient  royal  city,  brought 
there  by  Menilck,  the  son  n  and  the  Queen  of  SI 

the  ancestor  of  the  royal  AbyBsinian  house.     In  i  very  church  of 
the  country  is  an  imitation  of  the  ark,  which  is  regarded  as  the 
greatest  sanctuary,  and  an  assurance  of  the  Divine  presence.     i< 
is  the  center  of  devotion;  presents  are  offered  to  it,  and  the  sanc- 
tity of  the  church  edifice  depends  chiefly  upon  it.     It.  is  a  little 
box,  mostly  made  of  wood,  and  upon  it  are  pi  iced  the  sauc< 
the  bread  and  the  cup  nscd  a1   the   Lord'.-   Supper.     Thej 
made  very  artificially,  and  con:;;. in  a  roll  of  pan 
name  of  the  patron  saint  of  the  church.     It  is  carried  abonl  in 
procession,  and  the  people  prostrate  themselves  before  it  in  the 
dust. 

It  is  probable  that  the  great  interest  which  is  now  taken  on  all 
Bides  in  Abyssinia  and   its  early  history  will  yet  light 

on  the  origin  of  Christianity  in  that  part  of  Africa,  and  on 
development  of  Jewish  Christianity  in  general 


Art.  X.— QUARTERLY  BOOK-TABLE 
Religion^  Theology^  and  Biblical  Li 

y  sor  in  Chi- 

,  .    512.     Andover:  W 


1869. 


These  "Studies''-   are  mostly  a  collection   of  Pr 

articles    published    at   different  times   in   the  Bibliotl 

They  are  productions  of  more  than  ordinary  excellence,  and 

well' worthy  republication,  and  a  general  ': 

class    of  mind-    delighting  in  thought   upon  their  high  thci 

Professor  Haven's  writings  are  marked  by  grace 

stvlc  rather  than  by  ;  lepth.     H< 

is'a  very  lucid   '•'  ;  ositor,  and   o 

We  :  /i".  e  with    him  in  in 

there   are  between  i  portanl  points  an 

ference. 

There  are,  fii  t,  two  valual 
ton.     Next  conv  i  a  ( 

with  much  gra  •  and  perfectly  corrccl  in  its 

trines.     The    young    student    in  philosophy  will  hardly  find 
topic  anywhere  els<     raon 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  CIS 

theology  there  are  essays  on  natural  tl  .  ilea, 

and  sin. 

We  have  never  admired  Dr.  Haven's  efforts  at  discussing  the 
freedom  of  the  will.     He  is  necessitarian,  but  rt.-j.-ci>  tl  i 
of  eausational  necessity  of  volition,  and  adopts  that  of  invariable 
succession.     Will  is  not  necessitatively  can 
volition  by  the  strongest  motive,  but  it  alwa;  >>nl- 

ing  to  said  motive.  By  this  distinction  he  expects  lo  escape  the 
must  choose  so  and.  so,  and  substitute  the  alw  oand 

so.     But  how  is  a  law  of  invariable  succession  any  1 
and  fatalistic  than  a  law  of  causational  succession  ?     A 
absolutism,  and   an   absolutism  must  be  obeyed.    To  say  tl 
Will  obligated  by  an  absolute   law  to  a  given  v   li  ion  can  will 
otherwise  is  a  contradiction.     Nor  will  it  do  for  Professor  Haven 
to  deny  that  he   holds  this  invariability  to 
lie  does.     For  ask  him  why  we  may  not  believe  thai  a  Wii! 
sometimes  act  out  of  that  law  and  actually  choose  otherwise,  and 
you  willfind  the  Professor  (unless  pul  oi  1 1  will  smile  with 

blended  compassion  and  con  1  tell  you  "Thai 

ahonr.'l  Invlneo...^.    Avn-ivi-,,, (I-,-  ■•...,-  »       Th?.t  3     tl  ' 

according  to  the  given  motive  is  absolute  law.  And  now  we 
ash,  Why  is  an  absolute  law  of  invariability  any  less  fatalistic  or 
exclusive  of  contrary  power,  or  destructive  of  responsibility,  than 
a  law  of  causational  necessity? 

Again,  why  is  the  exertion  of  a  contrary  power  any  more  con- 
tradictory to  law  than  the  existence  of  a  contrary  power?     Why 
is  an  act  contrary  to  the  law  of  invariability  any  mor< 
than  the  power  for  the  act  ?    Th; 

broken  no  more  invalidates  tbi  ility  of  its 

being  broken.  It  is  -  much  of  the  verj  essi  of  a  law  t<> 
exclude  a  contrar]  a  contrary  fact. 

You  cannot  tack  a  power  of  contrar;j  choice  up 
litional  invariability.     Y>';  Brown,  and  I 

missed  cause  and  causation   from   th 
universe  of  events,  and  substituted  universal  eternal  in 
did  they  imagii 

sible  limited   vari:  bility  ?     The    two 
Yon  i 
man;  it    drop    off  by  1 

usibility  is  tht  doctrine  of  Plato,  Cndi 
the  doctrine  of  an  aj  '  voli- 

tions, the  actuality  of  either  n  ml 

Fourth  Series,  Vol.  XXI. — 39 


Cli  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [October, 

On  page  115  Profess  >r  Haven  gives  us  (be  following  very  dis- 
couraging sentence:  "  In  common  wit) 

sitarians,  Mr.  Mill  understan  Is  by  necessity  si'mj  ■/  of 

an  event."     Now  it  is  a  flal  untruth,  of  which  Pi  Haven 

ought  to  he  chary,  to  say  that  Edwards   understood  by  "ne- 
cessity "  "  simple  certainty."     Edwards  meant  th< 
of  effect    from  absolute  cause.     The  following  |  from 

Edwards  stands  not  alone,       ■ 
book,  arid  the  clench  of  his  whole  argument : 

Tf  every  act  of  the  •  ' 
'iheact  of  the  will.     If  I 

the  causes  of  1  being 

put  forth   into  ac( 

is  properly  the  ■  motives.     M  I 

ments  but  by  tlieir  in! 

For  thai  ;  •  thing  that  is  1 

the  influence  of  anotl       thing. 

■  they  are  m  r  motives;  ever; 

event  being,    ns  was  pi 
proper  ground   and   n  ■      i  of  il  ■    • 
/. — P.  l'2C>. 

It  is  true  that  Edwards  does  apply  the  ■ ■     .  '. 
■surety,  but   it  is  by  taking  the  word  certainty  out   of  its  true 
meaning  and  applying  il  to  quite  another  thing,  na 
lute  production  of  an  effect  by  a  cause  destitute  of  power  for  any 
other   effect   instead.     It   was  the  great   purpose  of  Edw 
famous  argument  of  Infinite  Series  to  prove  thai  • 
other    cause,  is   destitute  of  "contrary   power."     Now  •"  simple 
certainty  "  is  merely  the  will-be  of  an  event   whi 
not,  be  otherwise.     The  most  unflinching  causatii  I  that 

ever  wrote,  so  far  as  record  can  Jonathan!; 

In  regard  to  the  basis  of  moral  obligation,  G<  thing 

because  it    i->   right,  i;.    the    time    proposition;   not,   A  ;i.; 
right  beca  i  •  ills   it.     [1  is  true  that   "G 

to   do   whatever   1       •'         ,"  pro  via1  •'• 
perfectly    docs)  to   do  only  what   is 
find  Calvi  ■'■  intain  tin 

hear  Arminian  >; 

the  divine  "Will.     It  is  strange,  beeau  argu- 

ment, in  which  they  fire  so  cam 
o,  is  that  for  (  U  tl  to  w  ill  tl 
be  W] 

We  are  obliged  to  Profe:  sor  Haven  for  th 
elusive  reasoning  on  I        point,  in  fine  (  Id  I 
"Dr.  Bellamy,  the  fri<  ad  and  pupil  of  Kdwj 


1869J  Quarterly  Book-Ta  C15 

If  we  should   supposo  (as  some  do)  thai  tl  ante- 

cedent i"  a  co]  I  the  positive  will  and  law  • 

reign  will 

- 

1.  T.  ■  perfections  of  i  cance 

at  all. 

nd  so 
no  fonn  ■  any  moral  pr 

nothing  for  God  10  I  >v<    or  hate,  ■ 
inclinatio    <  i   •'  ■ 

lit  and  wrong.  ...  . 

2.  Thi  '  ;    ings  there  is  no  mi 
than  there  is  to 

r  wrong.     Just  as  if  God  was  not  i  rthy  of  our  big 

rea- 

and  stronger  ridently  ab- 

surd. 

3.  That  there  is  i 

him.  or  forbid  thee  ■        •  aid  reward  Iheoue 

i 
0j  q{  ij'g  jawis  overt     u    I,  and  all  religion  torn  up  by  the  roots,  and  nothing  is 
left  but  arbitrary  tyrannj  jection. 

Things  divine  arc  often  well  illustrated  by  things  human.  Sup- 
pose the  Empress  of  France  to  be  so  perfectly  the  arbiter  of  fashion 
that    what  she  wills  to  wear  is  c 

the  world  over.     Could  any  body  then  be  so  absurd  as  to  com- 
pliment her  as  being  a  very  fashionabU   ;  '  ht  be 
complimented  as  beinj                ;  thai    is,   with  obeying  the  laws 
of  esthetics  in  setting  the  fashions.     But  6ince  wl                 y  she 
dresses  becomes                 very  fact  the  standard  of  fashion,  no 
one  would  ever  think  of  attributing  i:  to  her  a<  a  merit  thai  she 
was  perfectly  fashiona ble;  for  fashionabl  means  con/on  - 
a  fashion                   tablished.     So  if  whatever  way  G 
ably  wills    1                                 ry  fad   the  standard  of  right,  no 
one    could    attribute   to   God  any    merit   in   being  a   rigl 
bein^. 

Professor  Haven  (on  p.  425)  seems  to  say  that  Dai 
trine   of  "Natural  i  removes  all  occasion  for 

X„n-:  we  think,    Dan  in's  theory  only  tells  how  certain  "mind- 
molded  "  forms  survive  an  I  '  u'11 
how,  or  by  what  \)0\  er,  they  are  eith< 
can  showhow  the  "  I 
"fit  "  should  o  '                    how    sub 
hi-!  ' 
nifice: 

organism  and  cl 

eystemization  |uei 

mands   a   continual   interposition   into  chaos   by    mind-di 


63  C  Methodist  Quarterly  Revi  [Oc1 

power;  that  is,  a   continued  series  of  miracles,  presuj 
agent-mind  as  Cause. 

Tf  vo  seei  •  thus   far  only  picked  a  series  of  qui 

with  the  Professor,  let  it  be  noted,  first,  \ 
great  awakener  of  thought  ;  and  second,  thai  our  : 
mostly  rather  with  his  system  than  with  his  methods  of< 
ing  it.     Apart  from  these  specia]  nd   his  writi 

as  embodying  very  subtle  thought  in  very  lucid  style. 


The  Oficeand  Work  of  tlie  Christi      U      '  i/.     By  James  M.  Hoppix,  Pr<  ressor  of 
Homil  8V0    ,,p_  620. 

Sheldon  k  Com]  any.     18G9. 

Professor  Hoppin's  purpose  in  this  volume  is  to  furnish  a  text- 
book in  Homiletics  and  Pastoral  Theology.    Though  inte 
chiefly  for  the  use  of  the  theological  student,  he  has  made 
valuable  book  for  pastors  as  well.     He  believes  that,  while  ti 
and  men  change,  bo  that  the  jut.  ul  in  one  ■■ 

unadapted  to  another,  there  are  certain  unvarying  principl 
preaching  which  are  always  true  nud  essential.     These  print  ' 
he  has  well  laid  down  and  illustrated,  departing  hut  littli 
the  ordinary  plan,  and  in  a  clear,  fresh,  attractive  i 

A  practical  theologian  is  both  preacher  and  pastor.     The 
topics  of  "Preaching"  and  the  "Pastoral  I  fore, 

with  propriety,  treated  in  tin-  same  volume.     The  Inti 
devoted  to  a  consideration  of  the  greatness  •  i  f  the 

ministry,  in  a  manner  impressive  to  the  sti  'The 

subject  oi^  Preaching  is  discussed  in  t\  :  ■  first,  "  Preach- 

ing Specially   Considered;"  and,  second,  "!.. 
Preaching."     In  each  part  are  two  "  di 
of  "  The  History  and  Art  of  Preaching ;"  the  second,  of  " 
Analysis  of  a  Sermon."     While  the  author  defines  preachii 
"literally  a  heralding  of  the  word  of  God  to  n 
braces  all  mo  les  of  making  known  the  Gospel  to  men, 
the  design  of  Christian  preaching,  ii 

i,  to  be  "so  to  Bet  forth  divine  truth. 
simplicity,  love,  and    '  upon  the  Spiril 

build  up  men  in  the  i'  of  < 

Is."    This  is  bro    '.  cl     r,  i  ■ 
the  only  sen 
seen  a  better  sketch  of  the  history  of  pi 
in  about  twenty-five  pages.    Tin 
ing  are  not  passed  over.     Pj 
the  niemoriter  m<  thod  of  delivery,  more  for  the  written,  an  1 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book -Tc  017 

for  the  extempore.    lie  advises  a  written  sermon  for  the  moi 

and  an  extemporaneous  one  in  the  afternoon  of  the  1 

because  a  man  who  does  not  write  much  cannot  spe;  ' 

lie  acids,  "Yet,  if  one  will  continue  to  write  and  study  carefully, 

and  not  let  down  his  literary  standard,  but  be  constantly  advancing 

it,  then  lie  may,  and  perhaps  should,  strive  to  make  !*; 

gether  an  extemporaneous  preacher."     In  any  case  he  would  have 

him  strain  every  nerve,  and  be  equal  to  the  demands  ofth<  I 

A  student  in  a  theological  seminary  must  Vie  supposed  ; 
familiar  with  (lie  principles  of  rhetoric,  bu1  their  application  to 
preaching  is  so  finelj  that  this  divisi 

most  admirable  portions  of  the  treatise. 

In  the  part  of  the  book  winch  treats  of  the  Pastoral  I 
bracing  nearly  half  its  pages,  the  author  endeavors  ><>  give 
counsels  as  will  tend  to  produce  "those  strong,  hai  I; 
bearing,  cheerful,  hopeful,  wise,  hiving,  and  single-mind 
who  are  willing  to  labor  among  the  poor  i 
rich  and  the  educated,  who  are  willing  to  go  any  wh  re,and 
any  thing  which  is  required  for  the  i:  1  of  mi  .."     H 

Writes asa  Congregationalist ;  but  there  is  verj  little  which  is 
applicable  to  the  of  any  Church,  and  no  ! 

his  earnest  words  without  a  stirring  of  his  -  quickeniug 

of  his  zeal.     He  treats  (!)  of  the  pastoral  office  in  itself 
ered,  (2)  the  pastor  as  a  man,  (3)  the  pastor  in  his  relations  to 
society,  and  (i)  the  pastor  in  his  rela1i<  Church,  ei   I 

ing  the  two  divisions  i  f  public  1  the  car 

Much  thai  pertains  to  the  pastoral  life  and  work  can  be  learned 
onh  from  experience ;  bu1  the  young  minister  who  has  carefully 
studied  and  pot  lei   d  the 

upon  his  great  and  noble  life-work  with  broad  \:--- 
high  aims,    ad  an  intelligence  that  is  no  mean  preparation  for  the 
duties  of  his 

We  are  pl<  ased  w  ith  this  volume,  and  h 
our  ministry  for  its  intrinsii   worth  as  a  whole,  and 
its  extensive  and  admir;  I  I    treatraenl  i  '    >ffice.     In 

the  latter  resp<  ct  we  know  no  work  thai  surpassi 

•   - .       ■ 
tine  1 

]'.]>..  J   : 

In  seven  lectures  I))-.  Thompson  discusses  the  il 
qu<  Btion  of  the  concord  bi  I  w  e<  a 

creation  and  man.     The  Mosaii    oarral 


CIS  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [Od 

Bhows,  in  spite  of  al]  di1  .  to  present  that  com 

with  science  which  stands  in  contrast  with  all  the  fai 
mogonies  of  other  races,  which  cannot  be  accidental,  and  < 
must  therefore  have  been  supernaturally  composed.     On  this  | 
the  lecturer  is  very  skillful,  and  very  admirably  turns  the  t 
upon  his  scientific  obj< 

On  the  antiquity  of  man  he  :  grees  et  ;entially  with  the  Duke  of 
Argyll  and  Mr.  Baldwin,  that  the  received  Usheriau  chronology  c  in- 
not  stand.    The  order  of  pre-Abrahamic  events  h  Genesi        .  loubt- 
less,  true  as  an  outline  historyybu1  the  supposed  chronolo  j  > 
longer  be  accepted,     'i  oe  aye  of  the  pyramids,  the  mosl  authentic 
and  increasingly  corroborated  pedign  e  of  Egyptian  kings,  the  ver) 
early  appearance  of  distinct  negro  faces  on  the  monuments,  and 
the  very  primitive  divergences  of  language's,  conspire  in  his  view 
to  thrust  the  flood  and  the  Edenic  events  into  a  deeper  anti 
of  an  unknown  extent.     J  low  all  this  can  be  reconciled  with  the 
sacred  text,  especially  with  the  carefully-dated  genealog  i 
esisj  and  the  Messianic  genealogies  in  the  ■  yll,  Bald- 

win, and  Dr.  Thompson  alike  omil  to  state.  It  is  difficult  to  read 
the  precisely-worded  an  }<  formal  pedigrees  in  Genesis  without  rec- 
ognizing a  distiii  1  chro  lological  purpo 

Dr.  Thompson  rests  the  refutation  of  Darwinism  upon  the  geo- 
logical  argument.     Tl  .1    remains   reveal   no 
transitional  tonus.     Orel                                 dations  there  are,  but 
each  new  grade  makes  a  distinct    and  separate  1  ment, 
suggesting  either  miraculous  creations,  or  origination    bj   a  pri- 
mordial law  not   less  wonderful  and  divine.     Dr.  '1 
not  aware  of  Professor  Thompson's  astronomic  disproof  of  tl 
sibility  <>f  sufficient  geologic  time  for  the  theory  of  development. 
]j(.  quotes  the   following  valuable  passage  from 
"The  Silurian  rocks,  as  regards  oceanic  lite,  are  perfect  and  abun- 
dant in  the  forms  thej  have  preserved,  yet  there  aro  no  fish.    The 
Devouian  age  followed,  tranquilly,  and  without  a                 nd  in 
the  Devonii                 Idenly,  fish  appear— appear  in  Bhoals,  and  in 
forms  of  the  highest  and  most  perfect  type,    'flu-re  i-  1 
links  or  transitional  forms  between  the  great  class  ofmollnsca  and 
the  iriv.it  class  of  fislu  •.     There  i 
that  such  forms,  if  they  had  existed,  can  have  1 
deposits  which  i                    red  in  wonderful  |                         1  linut- 
estorn                                                  '                   '  ' 
containing  little  thai  is  new  to  those  vie.  have  studied  tl 
ject,  are  well  wn  rth  pi  rusal. 


1869.]  QuaricAy  Book-Table.  619 

Lamps,   ?itcl 
tratc  lb:  ; 
Pulpit  E 
H  «  -:    Minis    r  of  "  Square    Chapel 

York:   51.1V*.   I 

Under  the  three  leading  symbols  of  his  title  Mr.  Hood  classifies 
the  different  styles  of  the  Christian  ministry,  and  furnish    i 
variety  of  enterl   '  L  instructive  ]  ii  illustratioi 

is  perfectly  catholic  in  its  character,  including  in  its  compi 
sive  range  ibe  various  ages,  countries,  and  denominati 
Christian  Church.     Of  the  apostoli  t.  Paul;  of 

the  early  Church.  Chrysostom;  of  the  Middl  • 
oi'  the  seventeenth  and  eighteenth  centuries,  Puritan  Ad  m  is.     I1 
is  to  be  followed  by  another  volume  treating  the  pulpit  of 
own  age,  discussing  Robertson,  Pusey,  Manni      .         f man,  Spur- 
geon,  the  Abbe  Lacordaire;  a  volume  which  will  apparently 
have  room  for  somebody  to  supply  a  third  volume  of  Am 
"  Lamps,  Pitchers,  and  Trumpets."     Tl  rolume  < 

some  very  piquanl    pages  upon  the  Methodist  raiuistr;        th  oi 
England  and  America.     Our  young  pr<  achers  will  find  it  i 
readable  and  ?.  ive,  though  s<  lesultory,  1 

Mr.  Hood's  authorities  for  American  Methodism  are  Dr. 
vens's  History,   Sprague's   Annals    of  the  American  Meth< 
Pulpit,  Strickland's  Lives  of  Aabury  and  of  Grul         .       ' 
mi-  spelled  Kruber.) 

lie  thus    characterizes    two    celebrated    English    Met! 
preachers : 

II  hasl     :•  well  -  '      Dawson's  eloquence  on  any  other  1 

me 

metaphor,  andj 

, 

.... 

; 


. 


620  Methodist  Qua  '  [October, 

Lamp.     Robert  Flail 

-  bul  his  own  c  "    Tall,  graceful, 

■ 
He  had 
vast  thought,  sever.-  ; 


J  ■■:■  iahandhis  1 
Designed  for  both! 

pp.  431  and  vvii. 

This  volume  con    letesl 

Prophets,  the  greater  as  well  as  the  minor,  and  is  to  ho  foil 
by  Notes  on  Solomon's  writings.     They  arc-  all  charactcri: 
the  s:  :  simple,  clear,  practical,  pi>ms.  and  usually  perti- 

nent.    Novelty    and    profundity    are     not    their  aim;  yel 
exhibit  the    results   of  considerable    scholarship   and   research, 
without  the.  display  of  erudite  references  and  philology.     Ii 
volume  particularly,  which,  as  the  author  states,  covers  a  portion 
of  Scripture  frequently  regarded  as  of  less  general  interest  than 
the  other  pr     '  ,  the  1      ■  a  sympathy  with  the 

of  the  sacred  writer  thai  gives  them  special  freshness  and  unc- 
tion.    Scholars  will  not  perhaps  deem  them  of  v< 
but  the  plain  reader  will  prize  them  as  in  the  main  unfoldin 
sense  of  Sen      ire  in  an  easy  and  satifi 
the  devout  hearl  ton;  .  Divine  dealings  with 

people  during  Jeremiah's  period,     As  we  mighl  ■  m  the 

author's     '  jical  stand-point,  these  interpret*) 

with  the  Calvinistic  views  of  the  inevitable  and  absolute  cl 
ter  of  God's  disp  nsations,  . 
necessarily   pat  foi  ;ii  i:i  I  h  ■  ex] 
menting  on  the  Prophet's  own  cl 

very  birth,  (chap,  i,  5,)  Dr.  Cowles  r«  .  der  should 

not  assume   thai   '• :  ■  or  1  i- 

antec  any  more  fixed  in  tin  case  of  Jeremiah  than  in 

every  [any]      '  ■  .hare  the  divine] 

and  d  ided,  as  is  usu  il  with 

ird   to  the  univ. 
inexoi 

should  :  -  !      Vn    Appei  dix   : 

appropri  I   '•   oe     pi    1  with  a  refutation    of  the  extreme  1. 
win--  of  the  Milh 
very  difficult  task,  pin 

i  simultaiK  I 

mai  itain  that  ' 
our  Lord's  historical  advent,  bul  . 


1869.]  Quarterly  nook-Tulle.  621 

?><'   Secret  of  '  ■  icidation  of  bi 

NaturalHu     mity.    By Henry  James,     8vo.,  pp.  243      !' 

&  Co.     1 

Swedenborg  is  a  problem  whose  "secret"  would  be  well  •. 

knowing  could  we  find  (what  never  yet  has  appeared)  a  coin] 

revealer.     "The  secret  "  of  Mr.  James  is,  th 

little  competence  in   that  direction,     lie  is,  inde 

reverent  discipl    of  th<   gi   .  ede,  and  profoundly  irreverent  in 

most  othei  di  Hei  ;   ■       '  hater,"  a  ver 

one.     Of  this,  as  of  a  former  work  of  his  which  we  1  avi 

review,  a  very   striking  characteristic  is  elaborate  invectiv< 

vective  againsl  all  systems,  worships,  and  revi 

own.     The  extant  Ghristianitj  he  prouo  an  the  worst 

Atheism.     "  The  most  flat-footed  and  flat-headed  Materialism 

day,  such  as  that  of  Carl  Vogt,  and  Moleschott,  and   Biichn  r,  is 

preferable  in  this  state  of  things,  as  it  appears  me,  to  our  old  . 

supematuralism." 


Credo.     16mo.,  pp.  444.     Boston :  Leo  &  SbeparcL     18G9. 

What  Henry  James  is  pleased  to  style  "old  fossil  supernatural- 
ism,"  appears  hi  these  pap;.-  quick  with  a  vivid  life.  The  I 
appears  a  true  "supernatural  book;"  the  risen  Jesus,  the  "Three- 
One;"  Satan  and  the  spirit-personalities  are  pres  "super- 
natural beings;"  Christian r<  generation  is  the  "supernatural  life;" 
and  in  the  eternal  future  i.-,  disclosed  a  "supernatural  desl 
These  four  supernatural  constitute  the  topii                    ok. 

The  work  is  written  in  an  animated,  rapid  style,  and  abound-:  with 
individual!  tic  1       hes  and  live  hints.     Jt  ha 

impression  upon  the  public,  and  makes  its  impress  upon  iudr 
minds. 

Professor  T<>v.  nsend  has  rei    on  to  bi   gratified  w  ith  i' 
of  his  work.     Ten  years  more   of  mature  and   varied 

reading  will  enable  him  to  produce  so  funda- 

mental and  perma 


■ 

! 

othi  rs; 

12mo.,  ]  !•■  476      I 

A  very  scholarly  work,  with  a  preface  written  i:i  a 

spirit.      Both 

a  tendency  to  dii  tinish  th-  n  iraculoua  i  ' 


C22  MeiJiodut  Quarterly  Eeview.  [October, 

History,  Biography,  and  Topography, 

Tha  Ma  .    i  ,  |  0f  the  Orang-TJtan  and  the  Bird 

A  Narrative  of  Travel,  -\  ,   md  Nature.     By  Au 

Wallai  and  Rio  Negro,1 

.     12roo.,  !■]..  G38.     New  York;  Ha 

Mr.  Wallace    is    specially    distinguished    among   scientist! 
bavin-  arrived   independently   at  the   central   i  .  '.   Mr. 

Darwin  has  elaborated  with  such  brilliant  results  in   his  < 
of  Species— that  animal  forms  are  limitlessly  variable  in  their 
development,  and  species  is  bnt  the  present  form  preserved  by 
favorable  conditions.     The  present  work  is  the  record  of  1 
years'  scientific  life  and  vigilant  observation  in  the  isles  of  the 
Indian  Ocean.     It  is  the  pioneer  of  a  comph  t<  r  knowl<  dge  of  a 
region  but  diinh  1  qowu  in  English  literature;  in  fact,  one  ■  I 
opening  announcements  that  the  great  and   wonderful  Pacific, 
rich  with  incalculable  future  po;   ibil  wig  into  hi. 

Mr.  Wallace,  however,  has  no  dashing  enthusiasm,  no  rhetoric, 
or  pictorial  fancy.  His  h  the  quiet,  prosaic  enthusiasm  of  the 
man   of  science,   who  rejoices  in   catching    flyin  ;  aique 

butterflies,  fresh  species  of  beetles,  and  rare  birds  for  stalling  and 
housing  for  the  museums  of  the  savans.  He  spends  days  in 
hunting  the  orang,  that  mockery  of  the  human  shape,  leaping 
from  tree-top  to  tree-top,  skillfully  evadii  amid  the 

densest  foliage.     It  is  a  perfect  paradise  to  hiin  t< 
species  of  that  unrivi  aim,  the  Bird  of 

Paradise;  and  his  pi  ges  are  pictorially  glorified  with  their  beauti- 
ful  figures,  adorned  by  nature  with  a  quai  atriv- 
ances  too  clearly  intenti  ,.al  in  their  aspects  and  ch:  r 
explicable  on  the   theory  of  blind   development.      Most  minds 
are  apt  to  imagine  that  in  this  regi<                  ance,  when    the 
sunbeam  and  the  moisture  blend  their               I  1  paint  all  u 
in  the  most  dazzling  hues,  and  to  wreath  all  being  in; 
luxui "                                  ■  the   fancj  of  th 
into    life    in   the    roost    prosaic    brain.      Mr.  Wall 
exhil                   ■  inspiration,  bul  he  flings  a  terrible  w< 
ovt  r  the  enthu: '                     readi  rs  by   firralj   U 

■     pictures   of  lu  adors   havi 

real  counterpart    in   ni  •  arc 
tropics,  ui  •  •  i    •  ■  I   in  brilliancy  by   the  other 
belief  that  the  tropica]  landscapes  and  tbick<  oncd  with 

an  ovens  h  '  rgro  wth  of  cvcr-bl  lisan 

illusion  produced  bj  the  collection  of  the  ricl  in  the 


1800.]  Quarterly  Book-Table. 

hot-houses  of  our  naturalists.     "The  tine  tropical  flowering  plants 
cultivated   in  our  hot-houses  have  been  culled  from   the    • 
varied  regions,  and  therefore  give  a  mosl  erroneous  idea  of  their 
abundance  in   anj    one  region.     Many  of  them  are  very  rare, 
others  extremely  local,  while  a  c  le  number  inhabi 

more  arid  regions  of  Africa  and  India,  in  which  tropical  vegeta- 
tion does  not  exhibit  itself  in  its  usual  luxuriance       Fin< 
varied  foliage,  rather  than  gay  flowers,  is  more  characteristic  of 
those  parts  where  tropical  vegetation  attains  its  highest  develop- 
ment, and  in  such  districts  each  kind  of  flower  seldom 
perfection  more  than  a  few   week--,   or  sometimes  a   few   days. 
In  every  locality  a  lengthened  residence  will  show  an  abundam  e 
of  magnificent  and  gayly-blossomed  plants,  but  they  have  I 
sought  for,  and  are  rarely  at  any  one  time  or  place  so  abun 
as  to  form  a  perceptible  feature  in  the  landscape,     But   it  has 
been  the  custom  of  travelers  to  describe  and  group  together  all 
the  fine  plants  they  have  met  with  during  a  Ion     j 
thus  produce  the  effect  of  a  gay  and  flower- pail      I   .  :ape. 

They  have  rarely  studied  and  described  individual  scenes  \ 
vegetation  was  most  luxuriant  and  heautiful,  and  fairly  stated 
what  effect  was  produced  in  them  by  flowers.  J  have  done  so 
frequently,  and  the  result  oi'  these  examinations  has  convinced 
mo  that  the  bright  colors  of  flowers  have  a  much  greatei  in 
fluence  on  the  general  aspect  of  nature  in  temperate  than  in 
tropical  climates.  During  twelve  years  spent  amid  thi 
tropical  vegetation,  I  have  seen  nothing  comparable  t<>  tin-  effect 
produced  on  our  landscapes  by  gorse,  broom,  heather,  wild 
hyacinths,  hawthorn,  purple  orchises,  a    L  buttercuj   ."■    P 

Mr.  Wallace  e,  observant  of  the  nature  < 

presented  in  these  Pacific  regions.     The  two  great  rac< 
Papuan,  whose  center  appears  to  he  Australia; 
who  hails  from    the  I  h<   e   are 

strikingly  contrasted  races.  The  former  are  an  irrepressible, 
lively,  rollicking,  ingenious,  and  inquisitive  folk ;  the  latter,  with 
their  mil.!  odimenl  of  the  ;•' 

matic,  the  soft,  and  the  imp;      ...     The  Papuan 
immen  en  the  liei  11  Pacific  ;  i<  ;.  including  :    • 

wieh.      If  Ci  in  asii  i. 

Mr.  Wallace  predicts  that   the   Malays   will   - 
venient     Bui  the 

"  destiny "  of  the  irrepressible  Papuan.     'A   warlike  and  i 

gctio  people,   who  will  not   Buhmit  to   nat  or   to 


62i  Methodist  Quarterly  JRevi  [Oct 

domestic  servitude,  must  disappear  before  the  white  man  as 
surely  as  do  the  wolf  and  the  tiger."  So  that  Mr.  Wallace  applies 
i        duly, even  to  the  human  race, the  {  "survival 

of  the  fittest." 

But  in  comparison  witb  the  primitive  life   oft!      i  leSj  Mr. 
y/.  ig  no      |         r  of  our  present  complex  cii  The 

idea    of  our  phil:  : ;  a   future 

right  and  justice  shall  so  rule  that  the  -  I  happiness  of  all 

shall   be   secured,      "Now  it  is   very   re)::.  hat  among 

people  in  a  very  low  stage  of  civilization  we  find  some  app 
to  such  a  perfed  te.     I  have  lived  with  • 

Bavawes  in  South  America  and  in  the  East,  who  I      e  no      jts  or 
lav  courts  but  the  ptiblic  opinion  of  the  village  freely  expr. 
Each  man  scrupulously  respects  the  ri  f  his  fellow,  and  any 

infraction  of  those  rights  rarely  or  never  takes  place.  In  such  a 
community  all  are  n  ;-     There  are  none  of  tl 

distinctions  of  education  and  ignorance,  wealth  and  poverty, 
master  and  servant,  which  are  the  product  of  our  civilization ; 
there  is  none  of  I  division  of  1  tDor  which,  i 

it  increases  wealth,  produces  also  conflicts  inl 
not  that  severe  competition  and  struggle  for* 
wealth,  which  the  dense  population  of  civilized  inevi- 

tably creates.     All  incitements  to  greal  crimes  are  tl  i 
and  petty  ones  are  repressed,  partly  by  the  influ  nee  of  public 

opinion,  but    chiefly   by  that  natural  sense  of  j 
or's  right  ma  to  be,  in      me  degi 

every  race  of  num. 
"Now,  although  we  have 

state  in  intellectual  achiev<  i 

in  morals.     It   is  true  that  among   those  i  bo  have  no 

wants  that  car,    '  sily  supplied,  and  torn  pubho 

ion   has   gi  he   rights  of  otl 

spected.     Tt    is   tme,   also,   that  wc   '  the 

sphere  of  tho  e  ri  I  include  within  them  all  tl 

hoodofman.     But   il   i     nol    ' 

onr  i ulations  have  nol   al    all   advanced   be; 

and   have   in   r 

ficient  morality  is  th.   greal  bl 

ereal 

*  If  therefore,   thi     " 

are  now  only  in  a  co]  •     . 

will  only  be  realized  as  the  result  of  a  higl 


1869.]  Quarterly  JBooh-Table.  625 

be  the  artistic  consummation  of  which  the  natural  stab 
the  shadow.     Is  there  any  just  hope  of  this  high  attainn 
If  through  nature,  it  can  only  he  by  countless  ages  of  <J< 
If  through  revelation  and  grace,  there  may  be  now  the 
dawning  morning-ray. 

0»:r  X 
trated.     !.  id  and  gilt.     12mo.,  ;  p.  524  : 

A  half  century    ago   "the   tour   of  Europe"  was   the    su 

of  touring  ambition ;  then  came  "the    toui 

tine;"  now  is  inaugurated  "the  tour  roui  Id."      Mr. 

Coffin   pioneers  the  way,  in  the  present  volume,  with  a   living 

spirit,  an  observant  eye,  ami  a  rapid,  vivid  pen.     Few  writers  have 

more  of  the  gilt  to  make  the  reader  hims  If  an  imi    i   '  el<  r. 

His  boot   is  happily  illustri  ted  with  pi  turea  from  1'  •    - 

temporized  maps,  enabling  the  reader  at   every  step  to  1 

bearings. 

Mr.  Coffin  left  New  York  in  July  1866,  and  spent  two  years  and 
a  half  in  compassing  the  globe.     Passing  thro:  ;  i  and 

crossing  the  Mediterranean,  he  takes  an  interes 
Egypt,  and  givesa  ruiJ  account  of  tbe buez CanaL    J  bonee.thn 
the  lied  Sea  he  passes  to  India,  and  lays  open  thai 
country  to  our  view.     Its  ancient  history,  its  reli 
its  cities  and  ranges  of  country  and  clime,  all  paa 
graphic  review.  "  Its  rebellion  and  terrible  o\  erth 
of  European  ideas  and  customs,  the  pr<  !   I" 

mission  work,  are  described  in  a  true  and  genial  spirit.     An  i 
space  is  given  to  China  and  Jap  our  voyi 

the  Pacific,  touches  at  California,  i  ■ 

three  thousand  miles  from  heme,  his  foot  is  ou  th«  own 

dear  country.     In   California  he   find* 
scriptive  pen  in  the  both 

magical  in  its  growth  and  wonderful  in  it.  ],Y 

the  great  Pacific  Railroad  ! 

His  Mediterranean  I  ints  to  him  how  I 

is  become  Europ<  an  if  not  I 


626  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [Od 

fri  q  Cons  tantinopl    to  "Wid  I  has  gi  rtcr 

■ 
the  Fi  ;  He  is  i 

body  \-  ho  -jvill  aid 

I  ..      . 
keep  tin  ir  coach  .  ; 

at   all  tl  is  froi  i  • 
1  '  ■  "  to!  "—P.  14. 

How  the  railways  of  India  arc  convertinj    tl      '  from 

their  prose;;:  religion— whatever  they  are  converted  to — appears 
from  the  following  : 

Up  to  1S53  ti       I        sometimes  in  carl; 

drawn    by  oxen,   but  die  usual   convex  was  a  palanq 

should'    >.     Somo  of  the  paths  i 

rainy  bio.    Sin  for  travel  wli 

proj  tated.     The  p] 

not  only  in  India, 

be  i  ter  a  railway  car  on  account  .of  their 

iutermii    ling  o  -.  .  .  .  So   ii  obtaining  any 

returns  for  their  i  icd  fur 

the  opi  uing  of  a  shorl 

Contrar 
avail  theroselv  s  ol 
unniisi    ;able,  tal 

afford  nn 

board  a:  I  the  iuterior.  .  . 

thousai  d  mil  i.  ...   At  the  <  •  Brah- 

mai  s  ] 

villi   men  of  1  ft  I  them 

for  their  high  railroad 

managers  had  an  ei  on  t! 

■ 
iii  mam  ropeon 

S3  stem  ol  -  •   and   told   tlie 

could  not 

The  !•    nl  breaking;  up  u 

who  is  pu  re  i 

bench, 
■ 

I  ■  : 

si 

like   a  ; 

roots  It  is  .  with 

i 

;   it  1 

. 
i 
that  I 

Ll 

In  favor  oi  and  miss  i  linions  arc 

I : 
"Mis* 

:  .  -        •  .      . 

their  >' 


1869.]  Quarterly  B<  >Jc-T< 

am  mg  the  passei 
Baid         captain  oi 

Facts  and  The  census  i 

• 
India   and  Burniah  at  about 
,      -  I     • 

iry  E  !   •:'-•.  • 
to  i 
regard  to  the  moral  infl       ce  which  has  g 
great   that 
dauce  for  them,  excej  aronou 

time  was  when  ihei  e  no  J 

B01   ■  ,,  ;  .    Li  rd  Clive  down  to  tl 

mistresses      All  Eng  re  Christians  in  1 

■eaters ;  i 
abomiii!  tion   to  tl 

■inkers  will  find  it  difficult  to  enter  paradise.     B 
Chi  •  •  n  as   au  Ei  ■      - 

'.  .    ill  on  his  km  .     ,  . 

demad 

Christianity,  ou  th<  i 
E,  '    . -    v 

in  the  army,  and  all  b 

The.  greatest  national  crime  of  the  last  three  centuries,  the 
greatest  moral   disgrace  which  Christendom   has    suffered, 
England's  forcing  the  l<  opium  trade"  upon  China  at  tl  • 
mouth.     Opium  could  be  raised  in  India  and  sold  in  Chin 
profit  of  four  hundred  per  cent.     The  heathen  I 
at  the  demoralization  and  ruin  the  drug  was  producir 
prohibited   its   importation.     ';  It    is   true,"   said  he,  "1 
prevent  the  introduction  of  the   flowing  poison.      Gi 
and  corrupt  men  will  for  profit  and  b<  i 
hut  nothing  will  induce  me  to  d<  rive  a  n  v<  Due  from  the  i 
misery  of  my  people."  ButtheEnglii  h  Govei  am 

heathendom  itself,  by  f  r  compelled  I 

the  hellish  drug.     The  horrid  sale  and  the  hon  •  I  the 

sale  are  still  in  full  blast  to  this  hour.     The  indignaut  lam 
of  the  English  missionary,  Martin,  is  n 

Why,  the  si 

d  -     ' 

Buttheopi 
a. 

ir  ■<■■■;     I 

Si 

Thousands  who   \    re    i  atranced   bj    the   *!    | 
Bishop  Hamlinc  will  gladly  hail  tin 


628  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [Octol     . 

of  sermons.     Dr.  Hibbard  gives  us  no  intimation  of  tin   extei  I  to 
which  he  intends  to  publish  these  "Works,"  but,  lanu- 

script  theological,  literary,  and  religious  works"  of  the  Bishop 
were  placed  in  his  hands  as  editor,  and  the  General  I  ■ 
of  1868  warmly  commended  their  publication,  we  assume  thi 
have  in  the  present  volume  only  install  rery 

valuable  series. 

Bishop  Hamline's  great  intellect  and  high  culture  were,  from 
his  conversion,  fully  consecrated  to  Christ.  The  thoro 
ciplined  powers  which  gave  him  eminence  at  the  bar  co  not, 
if  he  were  called  to  the  ministry,  fail  to  make  him  distingui 
in  the  pulpit.  From  the  day  in  which  he  was,  by  his  brethren, 
thrust  out  upon  his  six  weeks'  circuit,  he  burned  to  sav<  souls. 
Preaching  was  his  business.     To  it  he  consi  ■  m  the  first, 

his  entire  energies,  intellectual,  moral,  and  physici  I  illiant 

genius,  extensive  reading,  keen  logic,  vigorous  thou-': 
quisite  taste  were  all  brought  to  the  work  of  saving  men, 
were  as  freely  expended  upon  the  rustics  gathered  in  a  b 
house  as  noon  the  more  polished  and  crowded  c<  >n  in  a 

city  church. 

It  is  from  this  stand-point  that  these  sermons  are  to  be  read. 
They  were  written,  not  for  the  press,  but  to  be  preached.  As  in 
preparing  an  argument  for  the  bar  he  had  aimed  al  iththe 

jury,  so  in  preparing  these  sermon-  he  wrote  as  in  tl 
of  living  men,  every  one  of  whom  he  must  win  to  C   i 
aimed  at  immediate  effect,  and,  to  an  almost  marvelous  d< 
attained  it.     We,  therefore,  find  them   ch 
clearness  of  statera  'nt,  conciseness  of  expression,  aptm 
tration,  power  of  argument,  and  that  clinching  of  a  point,  when 
once  made,  which  always  tells.     We  are  prepared,  m< 
practical  and  spiritual  themes,  v.  •  ,  however  lofty,  | 

gophical,  01  pi '  foi  nd  the  discussion  of  them  may  be,  ifl  i 
souls  to  the  cross. 

"  Dr  Hibbard,  after  a  line  Monograph  of  twenty  p 
Introduction,  hi  as  twenty-three  of  th« 

apparentlv  e lectccl  as  to  give  the  read 

of  topics  ai  matter,  but  a  fuU  and  I 

Ramlineas  a  preacher.     Two  or  three  of  them  i 
communion  ten  ation    and  anotl 

a»onthcocc;i  ion  of  the  death  < 
Harrison;  the  rest    were  for  the  regular  ! 
what  an  .     i  ,  beauty,  and  (broo  pervade  th  m  nil  I 

and  there  a  word  or  sen- 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Table.  629 

the  author's  revision,  but  such  flaws  are  more  than  co 
for  by  numerous  of  surpassing  elegance  and 

perfect  that  to  touch  them  would  be  only  to  mar  them.    The 
training  of  the  lawyer  is  continually  manifest  in  the  metho 
the  discourse,  the  discussion  of  legal  principles,  the  use  - 
guage,  and  the  avoidance  of  that  stereotyped  phn 
which  it  is  go  convenient  for  preachers  to  fall,  and   which   the 
world  denominates  cant.    The  sermon  on  "  God  ateous 

Judge"  perhaps  best  illustrates  the  effect  of  hi 
That  on  "Jesus  Reviled"  is  full  of  melting  tenderness,  and  Mr- 
fancy  we  can  hear  the  shouts  of  the  audience  as  the  preacher  ap- 
plied its  doctrine.     If  he  could  melt  to  tears,  excite  to  raj  I 
and  win  to  submission,  he  could  also  alarm  by  the  terril     . 
the  sermons   on    "The  Sentence   against   Unbelief,"   and   "The 
"Wages  of  Sin."     Indeed,  we  do  not  wonder  that  an  infidel,  who 
once  heard  the  latter  from  Hamline's  lips,  said  to  a  friend  that 
"for  days  after  nothing  rang  in  his  cars   but   wages! 
loages!'''' 

As  Bishop  Hamline  prepared  hi?  discourses  for  the  people,  this 
volume  may  well  be  received  by  the  people  as  published  for  tl 
selves.     Xeverlheloss,  as   his  great    argument  in    the   General 
Conference  of  1844  has  been  read  and  re-read  for  its 
of  ecclesiastical  law,  so  our  students  of  homileti 
tageously  study  these  sermons  as  the  productions  of  one  of 
great  masters  of  pulpit  oratory,  and  especially  for  thi 
and  naturalness  of  their  structure. 


e?  ■ 

Institutes  of  Ecclesiastical  £ 
rected,  enlarged,  ai  I  improved  from  I  uthoritics.    Bj  Jons  Law- 

bexce  Vox  MosHEiir,  ]  >.  D.,  C 
:      ■  an  !  literal  ti 

Notes,  e-r'.:'<:    J  D 

8vo.,  pp.  470,  4S5, 

Mosheim's  Chur  is  one  of  the  standard  works  \ 

may  be,  in  particular  i  d,butcans< 

seded  or  becom  ition  by  Dr.  M  irdo 

been  acceptable  to  Christian  scholars  on  both  sid  Ulan- 

tie.     The  ; 

proof  of  tl  of  the  work,    ] 

ianism,  of  course,  tb< 

Dr.  Murdoc 

taste  and  temper.    The  n 

which  this  great  work  is  n  iritbin  the  i 

of  <-vcry  owner  of  a  library. 

XXI. — 40 


630  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [October, 

The  Pid 
of  the  ' 

Ami  ricaa  J.  ]  ,. 

graving*  oi   wood,  by  Lo 

bor.    8vo.,pp.  1013.    Greenandgilt    New  York :  ] 

One  of  the  attractive  books  of  the  Lo 

familiar  to  American  households.     The  pn  \    ' 

of  the  most  trying  of  our  early  nation::!  Btrug   .'■  I  j 

interest  both  to  our  curiosity  ami  our  patriotism.     Over  tin-  1 

fields  pictured  here  by  Lossing,  both  North  and  South  can 

with  united  pride. 

Life  of  Samuel  Johnson,  LL.D.    By  Rev.  C.  Adams,  DD.    Illustrated.    12mon  pp. 
3-10.    KewYork:  C  balden. 

Johnson  was  one  of  the  most  noble  characters  in  English  litera- 
ture, and  bis  biography  by  Boswell  is,  in  some  respects,  unparal- 
leled in  any  literature.  The  stupcnd<  re  in 
our  day  pi-esses  the  old  giant,  into  the backgroimd  ;  but  Dr.  Adams's 
classic  pen  makes  here  a- noble  effort  to  bring  him  forward.  It  i^- 
a  noble  book  for  our  young  nun,  and  young  women  too. 


Bold  Fn  Preacher.     A  Portraiture  of  Rev.  William  Cravens,  of  ". 

Rev.  J.  B.  "Wakeley.     18mo.,  pp.  119.     Cine    a  ti :  Hitchcock  4  V. . 

York  :  Carlton  &  Lai 

The   powerful   denunciations   of  slavery  by   Wesley,   Coke,  au-1 
Asbury  were  sustained  in  the  South  for  some  time  by  a  few  in- 
trepid spirits  among  the  Southern  Methodb  t  ministry,  v  ' 
is  very  likely  to  be  lost  from  history.  •  Mr.  Wakeley  has  < 
to  preserve  the  doings  and  utterances  of  one  of  thi  in  the 

present  little  volume.     Had  the  South,  Church  and  ! 
to  and  obeyed  these  monitions,  what  crimes  and    sorrows  would 
have  been  prevented. 


Poli  ncral  Mor  '  . 

Uislory  of  E 

York: 
Air.  Led  >  has  attained  a  high  r< 

j    of  Katie 
alistic  stand-point.    The   present    tw< 
written,  perhaps,  with  an  equal  ability  and  an  i 
of  Rationalism.     Mr.  >ns  with  an  ablo  di 

old  question  of  the  basis  of  tlu 

>19  0f   Qtili  and  Intuitionalism,  in  which  he 

stronelv  advocates  tl  aofthe  latter  Bchool      W 


1869.]  Quarterly  Booh-Ti  633 

any  fundamental  originality  in  this  discussion,  Mr.  L 

his  views  with  great  clearness  and  freshness  of  thought  and  Btylc. 

Though   it  has  been  forcibly,  and   perhaps  correctly,  urged  by 

reviewers  that  this  discussion  lias  no  proper  plao   b 

fully  disconnected  with  the  body  of  the  history  that  it  i  tight  be 

omitted  without  diminishing  the   historical  complel   aesa  of  the 

work,  we  should  reluctantly  consent  ti  alue, 

Scientific  investigation  into  the  nature  of  ethics  an 
title  investigation  into  the  secrets  of  physics — of  primary  i: 
ance  to  the  attainment  of  perfection   in  our  views  of  reli 
Whatever  a  thorough  analysis  in  either  departn 
false  or  wrong— however  it  may  have  been  incorporati 
past  history  or  theory — Christianity  is  bound  by  her  very  u 
to  reject.     If  adverse   criticism  could  demonstrate   in  the  very 
sacred  text  itself  the  maintenance  of  a  wrong,  Christianity  would 
be  obliged,  by  her  fundamental  doctrines,  to  admil  and  repu 
the  blemish.     If,  then,  the  scientific  moralist  is  able  to  drav.  I 
history  new  views  of  morals,  as  may  in  many  depi  I 
case,  those  views  forthwith  become  a  part  of  our  present  Chris- 
tianity.    It  is  thus  that,  through  all  the  progress  of  mind,  ' 
tianity  perpetually  readjusts  and  reproduces  herself.    '1  b 
disappears,  the  essential  stands  forever. 

Wo  entertain  no  fear,  then,  of  works  like  Mr.  Li 
his stsad-point  this  is  a  profoundly  conscii  Qtious  w<  rk.     "Whether 
it  be  Philosophy  or  Religion,  Stoicism  or  Christianity,  the  Church 
or  the  World,  all  are  treated  with  an  inte  tional 
fairness.     No  faults  of  philosopher,  saint,  church,  or 
intentionall;  1  or  aggravated;  no  excellence!  are  d 

aged  or  denied.     Perhaps   his  position  of 
neutrality  was  the  best  possible  for  the  cl 
fresh  truth.     We  need  the  cold,  adverse  comrade  to  1 
and  fairly  our  own  faults.     Set  tl 
tiful  and  discriminative  vi<  ■ 

of  Christianity  over  all    pi  and    every  other   reli 

system,  and  though  the  triumphs  of  ( 
itly  attribute!  to  its  wonderful  fitness 
natur<  .      •         sively  '  ' 

full  and  heartfelt  recognition  of  tl 
or  the  absolute  divinity  "l'  Christ.     In  spi 

want  and  its  in  detail,  the  wort  v  i'l  be  fa  n  i  full 

of  interest  and   instruction   to  the  discriminating  i 
are  mi  ny  »ower,  which,  1... 


G32  Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [October, 

ions.     Sermons,  Speeches,   and  Letters  on   Slavery   and  its  \ 
From  '  .  I 

By  Giusert  Ha  vex.     12mo.,  pp.  650.    Boston:  L:    fc£  .    .         York: 

Carll      .  .     1869. 

This  a  cry  handsome  volume  contains  a  series  of  free  and  bold 
manifestoes,  in  eloquent  style,  on  the  side  of  truth  and  righteous- 
ness, extending  from  the  year  ]S50  to  1SG3.  They  mark  the 
epochs  of  the  great  contest  between  liberty  and  d<  We 

need  not  say  that  Mr.  Haven's  positions  were  ever  of  the  most 
advanced   and   sanguine  order,  generally   provi  tic  of 

coming  events.     His  closing  sermon  ou  America's;  Past  and  Fi 
is  especially  predictive,  we  say  not  how  accurately,  of  the 
when  not  only  color  shall  disappear  from  among  the  numl 
political  and  social  distinctions,  but  when  it  shall  be  rather  pro- 
vocative by  contrast  of  the  esthetic  and  amative  emotions.     This 
would  seem   to  us   to   involve  so  nearly  a  change  of  both   our 
psychological   and  physiological  structures  that,   we  should  be 
rather  inclined  to  classify  it  with  the  miraculous.     Our  own  view 
is,  that  we  need  only  take  care  of  the  present  duty,  and  let  that 
prophetic  morrow  take  care  of  itself.     We  have  so  many  pi 
problems  on  our  hands,  that  we  have  not  time  and  nervous  fluid 
to  spare  upon  a  panic  lest  our  great-grandchild  should  marry  a 
negro.     Indeed,  we  suspect  that  the  lover  of  sable  beauty  in  that 
generation  will  hardly  be  able  to  find  an  object  to  love. 
proportion  of  colored  faces  to  white  was  once  one  fourth;  it  is 
now  one  eighth;  and  the  next  census  will  find  it 
fore  our  children  leave  the   stage   it  will  be  one  twentieth  ;  and 
when  our  whites  reacb  a  hundred  millions, the  Babies  and  tawnies 
will  probablj  fall  below  six  millions.    As  an  occasion  ofp< 
power  and  plague,  as  well  as  an  object  of  philanthropy,  Afric 
America  is  a  vanishing  quantity.     The  schoolmaster  is 
truest  friend  of  tl  3  negro.     Education,  industry,  and  wealth,  will 
brino-hi  ral  respect,  and-  of  color  and 

contempt.     When  the  artificial  a  of  poverty! 

are  completely  removed,  the  whole  matter  may  be  1<  ft  to  our 
natural  feelings  such  as  they  will  prove  I 

We  hope  to  furnish  a  full  article  on  this  volume. 


A  Pr  ■■''■  Untrodud 

Some  years  ago  Professor  Harkness  i 
his  debtor  by  big"  H 


1869.]  Quarterly  Book-Tdk 

More  recently  he  has  added  to  thai  obligation  by  hii 
Latin    grammar.      In   the   Latin   Prose    Com] 
another  instalkn<  at  of  the  b<    ' 

The  work  is  essentially  a  supplement  to  both  the 
Second  Books  of  Latin  and  the  Latin  Grammar.     l  gout 

with  the  simplest*  forms  and  constructions,  it  carries  the  student 
along  by  a  natural  and  easy  progression  lill  be  n 
culties  and  elegancies  of  Latin  • 
out  the  entire  v  irk  the  author  preserves  a  judicious  1 
tween  grammatical  princi]  '   •  zeroises  fo] 

peculiarities  of  usage  are  skillfully  subordinated  to  re] 
struction.     The  book  is  I,  fresh,  scholarly.  v. 


Periodicals. 

The  Hour-    m    Home  (Scribner  &  Co.)  is   almo  I  the  only 
monthly  magazine  which  we  can  unequivocally  commend  I 
Christian  family.     The  conductors  do  not  deem  if  indi  ;    i 
to  its  existence  to   call   any  of  the   semi-infidel    clique   of  our 
country  into  its  corps  of  contributors.     It    is  < 
tinctively,  though  not  offensively,  Calviuisti  . 
alisl  ic. 

Among  its  articles  awhile  since  were  extr 

and  diary  of  Sarah  Pierpont,  afterward  Mi 

the  great  metaphysician.     Among  these  i 

phetic  dream  of  hers  at  the  time  of  the  birth  of  thi   i 

Aaron  Burr. 

Stc  I  '. 

Dj  lb  B  von 
of  to;1:'  ' 
' 

Burr,  Jr.,  i  '  the  College.     1 

immortal  will  grow 

iible. 

of  broken  sleep,  in  i 

the  oil.  ■.-.     H 

v  well.     At  I  . 

rise.     £ 

length  '.. 

at  the  \       '  • 


G34  .       Methodist  Quarterly  Review.  [October, 

At  this  I  vrokc  in  distress,  and  was  glad  enough  to  find  it  was  only  a  dream. 
Kow,  yon  may  make  as  much  or  as  little  of  this  as  you  .    ]     link  the 

d       .     d  stat.:  of  our  country,  along  with  my  own  ind 

edit.     A  ]■■--  •  ie  that  her  little  Aaron 

is  a  In  ::.-.  ]  rattl  'some  fellow,  filling  Lis  parents'  hearts  with  joy. 

Tour  loving  sister,  Sarah. 

On  this  dream  we  remark,  I.  Of  the  authenticity  of  its  record 

and  of  the  reality  of  its  occurring  there  can  be  no  doubt.  The 
"  higher  criticism  "  would  be  obliged  to  respect  and  accept  it. 
2.  Its  coincidences  with  facts  to  take  place  at  the  distance 
of  half  a  century  in  the  future  are  too  numerous,  too  minute,  and 
too  exact,  to  he  solved  on  the  theory  of  chance  or  accid 
concurrence.  3.  We  Lave,  then,  a  clear  case  of  prophecy  /  and 
the  fact  is  not  to  be  ignored  under  the  Rationalistic  assumption 
thai  prophecy — being  supernatural— is  of  course  to  he  rejected 
as  unhistorical,  unscientific,  tsud  false.  4.  It  is  remarkable  that 
the  facts  are  not  presented  to  the  dreamer  in  literal  form,  but 
artistically  draped  in  allegorj  ;  betraying  to  all  appearance  the 
art  and  design  of  some  unknown  mind  shaping  the  conceptions 
to  her  mind.  It  is,  therefore,  a  iievelation.  5.  This  revelation  is 
either  natural  or  supernatural.  If  natural,  then  the  term  natural 
is  so  enlarged  as  to  swallow  the  supernatural,  and  so  vacate  the 
distinction.  The  term  nature  may  then  include  superhuman 
nature,  super-mundane  nature,  and  even  divine  nature.  We  are 
then  left  with  this  conclusion  :  Within  the  range  of  nature  in  its  ' 
largest  sense, prophecy  and  revelation  are  not  only  a  possible  but 
an  actual  occurrence.  The.  rule  of  the  "higher  criticism,"  that 
the  Old  Testament  prophecies  must  be  repudiated  as  prophecies, 
becir.se  prediction  is  in  nature  impossible,  is  itself  to  be  re- 
pudiated. _ 

American  Agriculturist.    For  the  Farm,  Garden,  and  Household.    4to.,  pp.  3S. 
hly.)    New  York:  Orange  Judd, 

The  only  farm  we  have  in  the  world  is  Mr.  Judd's  c:  Agri- 
culturist." 1*  is  i  "■■■  the  less  model  and  all  the  more  cheap  for 
being  a  farm  on  paper.  Our  management  is  scientific  Our  cows 
arc   J  c  with  milk  if  not  with  honey;  our 

pigs  are  orbs  of  fat,  with  i  ;  a  tail  for  opposite  p    '    . 

our   roosters    and   turkeys    are   struttii  lis   of  "fuss   and 

id  machines  are  able  to  perform  on- 
,  like  the  Apocalyptic 
.  ty  month.     We  have  a  "castle  in  Spain"  \ 
we  purpose  to  locate  on  tl  oon  as  we  get  tune  to 

become  a  nidaleo. 


1869.3  Quarterly  Book-Table.  635 

Miscellaneous. 
Our  Late  Article  on  Schleieiinacher. 

Upon  Professor  Reubelt's  learned  and  interesting  article  upon 
Schleierniache]  in  .  late  number  of  our  Quarterly  Br.  W.  P. 
Warren  makes  the  following  valuable  suggestions: 

"John  Wesley  anticipated  Schleiermacher  more  than  half  a 
century, 

(a.)  In  rejecting  all  definitions  of  rejig; on  which  make  it  either 
fycoc/nitio  or  an  actus.  *  Weder  ein  Wissen  noch  ein  Thun.' 
(See  Wesley's  Definitions  of  Religion  ;) 

(Ik)  In  discerning  the  defective  nature  of  the  traditional  (anti- 
deistic)  apology,  (Wesley,  vol.  v,  p.  758;) 

(<?.)  In  constructing  theology  from  the  stand-point  of  a  clear 
Christian  consciousness. 

He  excelled  Schleiermacher  in  that  he  escaped  the  following 
errors,  into  all  of  which  Schleiermacher  fell : 

a.)  Necessit aria n i Pin . 

b.)  Pantheism  (for  a  time.) 

c.)  Sabellia  .    . 

d.)  Denial  of  a  proper  atonement. 

e.)  Denial  of  Christ's  real  pre-existence. 
f.)  Denial  of  the  Personality  of  the  Holy  Ghost. 

g.)  Identification  of  the  Holy  Spirit  with  the  esprit  de  corps 
of  the  Church. 

h.)  Identification  of  religion  with  one  of  its  constituent  ele- 
ments. 

i.)  Unsettlement  of  the  Canon. 

Facia  about  W  ■   I   '  lection  of  Anecdotes  haying  a  I 

i   the  two  mo  t  In  portanl    " 
Dosi  ir  of  "  Fact;:  al 

pp  307.     Ni  .',■  3  ■■':(.'  ;  [ton  &  Lanah    i.    I    .  inn    ; :   1 1  I  I  I    \ 

From  a  wide  course  of  literature,  ancient  and  modern,  Mr.  ; 
kersley  has  collected  a  mass  of  anecdotal  illustrations  which  will, 
we  doubt  not,  be  very  acceptable  to  the  class  for  whom  the  work 
is  done.     It  is  unique  in  ii<  hind,  and  fills  a  blank  space. 


Notices  of  the  fol  ooks  postponed  for  want  of  room. 

Pn ».  Woolsey  on  Di         J.  .'.  Co. 

Garl  '  Goul 

i;'  .       i  I  Co 

Brooke's  Sermons.     Fields,  0 


636  Methodist  Quarterly  Bern  [October, 

The  DEAD-LOCK.--Our  pamphlet   on   tlie  "  Dead-lock  of  Lay 
ation  in  the  Annual  Confer,  s  really  wril 

articfe  lor  our  October  Quarterly  ;  but  ho  widely  has  it  been  cir- 
culated, (with  our  own  consent,)  in  our  Church  papers  and  other- 
wise, that  its  insertion  is  forestalled— fortunately,  as  giving  room 
for  a  pre-  of  other  matter. 

The  editor  of  The  Methodist  pronounces  our  anticipations  of 
strife  to  be  baseless,  inasmuch  as  "the  laymen"  have  spoken, 
and  avowed  that  they  would,  as  in  past  times,  pursue,  in  any 
event,  a  trail  tuil  and  patient  policy.  We  cheerfully  accept  the 
intimation,  and  do  not  doubt  that  it  will  he  verified,  and  a  very 
salutary  influence  he  thereby  exerted.  But  "the  laymen,"  as 
thus  designated  can  he  fairly  construed  as  including  only  that 
class  of  our  laity  with  whom  Dr.  Crooks  stands  in  more  imme- 

rdly  able  to  pledge  the  entire  la 
the  Church  through   a  possible  earnest  contest  of  six  or  < 
future  years.     Our  article  was  prematurely  published  by  r< 
of  parties  far  more  widely  and  thoroughly  cognizant  of  our  entire 
Church  than  any  of  us  editors  have  the  means  of  being. 
Th(  'w  Christian  Adv    ate  has  professed  to  1 

illV(;  re,  our  article  as  a  threat,  intended  to 

bring  our  ministry  to  vote  under  stress  of  terror.  We  expressly 
declared   tl  rrote   without  any  communication  from  the 

laymen,  and  took  explicit  care  to  exonerate  them  from  any 
regp01  -  anticipations  or  evil  drawn  from  the  general 

qualitj  man  nature.    The  editor  of  the  Advocate,  there- 

fore ]Y  ..  ,  <  to  hi  1  lers  the  ludicrous  idea  that  we  have 
utte'nd  an  elaborate  threat  upon  the  great  body  of  our  n  : 

0'n  olir  ov, lority!    Dr.  Bushnell,  in  his  argument 

against  female  suffrage,  describes  in  glowing  colors  the  evils  that 
will  result,  :  nd  the  terrible  tilings  th.it  women  will  do  if  allowed 
to  vote.  With  what  wisdom  could  any  opponent  pronounce  that 
degcri]    •  t?    If  Dr.  Curry  will  please  maturely  to  an- 

.  we  doubt  not  lie  will  fail  to  find 
tnere5  of  a  belief  that  any  menace  was 

intended  0  ;' 1  :'^  ,ll°  c  voting  pro- 

c'^,]_   .  that  the  three-fourth  vote  will  be 

attained.      At  lecided   will   he   the    majority   tl 

trust    (witl 

the  Editoi  j   t!lC' 

Church,  v  l  an  aflarmative  - 


INDEX. 


Abbott:  Jestn  of  Na-me-th,  his  Life  and 

Tea  ihings Page  316 

Adams:  Life  of  SamuelJohnson,  LL.D....  630 
Attains:  l'hc   Weaver  Boy  who  became  a 

Missi  >nary 161 

Ame  'ican  Agi  cull  I  i  t  t    I 

Anitrican  Presbyterian  and  Theolo       I  R 

view 131,295,  442,  605 

Anderson:  Foreign   Missions;  thiir  Rela- 
tions and  Claims 454 

Athenians,  The  Religion  of  the 165 

'i :  e  Ap   itl<    Paul  i     Athens 

Ten  pie,  Statues,  and  AltaTs  of  Athens...  1C5 
Paul    detive.s   .'.i-   J'i.-tour;---..   oa  Mars1 

Hill 16S 

The  Athenians  a  "  Religious  People"...  169 

Mi  iningof  Sup  rstitiou :    1G9 

Mea::ii  ;  of  it-.        ...1  '■  :;■■'■  ion" 172 

Faith  of  the  Athenians  in  the  Being  of 

God 1T8 

Altar  to  the  "  Unknown  God" 178,  J--' 

M  m's  Consciousness  of  Dependence  ui>on 

God 17G 

Prayer  Natur  !         ','  ■       .■_  o  M-n,  .  ..   180 
Religioi  •:  •  :    , ■;. :i\  i:: ^    On- 

C!"USIJ.JC3  n:"  i>.-;    :.•'  r. •.  :i  .- 

Being '. 153 

O  "  I  of  ]  iability  to 

Funishui  '       '  of  lispi  .- 

turn  by  Pi  1S-G 

Atkinson :"  The  Garden  of  Sorrows,  etc.. ..  1-fl 

Bachinan:  The  Bo  !     fJnd  es 464 

Bain:   Mental  Sci     c ' 146 

Bal  er:  Tl     Mu  I    ■•-  10' 

Baldwin:  I  i  ■  ...  toric  Katioi  b,  etc 4  19 

Baptist   Quarterly 127.  2 

Beet     .  ■  .  .       :  Redeemer  and  R.  de<  i  ■-■•<< .  2T0 

— -  Sermoi  •  by 140,  45S 

Bcf  re  the  i  lir  ine  ;  or.  Daily  Devotions  for 

a  Child 824 

B  How  »'s  Travels  in  Europe 824 

Bible  Class,  My.... 477 

U  !  .■■  l:   [..-.Mti-ry,  Tlie. I.". 

Bib  ii  422 

Saul  aud  Pi  n 422 

The  Book  of  Enoch 424 

St.  Pi  ■  i  an '   . 

Biblical  RejK-itvo  a^d  Princeton  Review, 
1   ■',  8 

Bibliothvca  Sacra Iv7,  W,  V.±x  (■•■'■'• 

)•  i."  •;  :  i  i  -  ■  ■    •■      toTl  Irtj 161 

Bird:  '(  he  Victoi  iPoei    4->l 

Bishop:   A  Tl  i.  . 

South  An:  rici 163 

i  169 

i  Bil  le  Thoughts 

•'  ... 

port : : 414 

Boi  .    .  of  our 

161 

1  -.  :   ;.. 4M 

'     ■ 

I 

Quarterly  Reviow i    . 

I  :  ...  i      .        .  ....    824 

• 

etc .' 04 

a  Natu- 

i  atel 01 

.  II:  Moral  Uses  ol  DaA  rblnga Clo 


Calamy:  Works  f'f  the  llev.  John  Howe. 

M.A.,  with  Memoir Pag    149 

i  . 

'  II.. 163 

■.;.  i  tie  of  Kerry 150 

■  ■  of  Pi  arls,  etc. ". 8.'4 

Chaiarter,  How  to  Read 8'24 

rly 299,412 

i  .    I  cer 183 

Chun  iooI   1  he 191 

The  Three  Steps  in  the  Culture  of  a  Soul, 

Lllustral  of  J     10I 102 

The  Work  of  the  Family  and  of  the  l'i  1- 

pit '. IPC 

'i  :      v  •     -  !    .'  ■  ■  ..  I   from 

'  i    ■  :.    .    ..*. 157 

The  Ch  ireb  Sch  193 

The    Church  1          I  in    the    Primitive 
Church 199 

■  of  tbo  Modern  (  I 

1.  The    ;  WO 

2.  Y  el<       tlcal  1 

of  Grace 207 

8.  Earnest,  11  lined   Chri 

era 209 

ClcaveUnd  :  J\o  Sects  In  Heai  en,  and  other 

: 460 

■■:  A  Defense  of  Jrs'.is  <'iiri.-'. 14J 

i  .  -  New  v     .   R    ind  the  World..  625 

*                   liries 161 

J    i.     '.    •■• 127 

i  •■'         .-Axhn.r 102 

■  :  ;.'  Hows  :. :  Life,  'i  Ii 

of  St.  Paul '   I 

Conks-  Jeremiah   and  bi»  Leu 

with  Notes C20 

621 

C  Hi  ..  Thi  Case  of •!-•: 

Dalton:  A  Treatise  on  Physiology  and  Hy- 

168 

Darwin:  Variation   of  Ai.imals  u::.l  l';a.>U 
under  Domestication !»*"> 

Davics  :    \  Beli     •  -  -  Uand-Book  foi  Chris- 
tians of  Every  Name     8-4 

D,.vl-i..eV„  Tie..: I  16 

De  Mil      :.•'... 

Di  ••  art :  Bi 

the  Plyi  :    .  !■; 1-4 

;■'    I'ower 

'.  Moth- 
685 



■    »<  ' 

i  • 183 

94 

Edinburgh  Review 1 

■  . 

M7 

104 



. 

150 

Falrbalrn ;  Tbo  Bel  I        InScri] 

135 

■  :  7  So  i- 

ch....  <R<5 


633 


INDEX. 


Flagg:  Three  Seasons  in  European  Vino- 
yards Page  4S4 

Folsom  :  ThoFour  Gi  (pels,  Translati  dfrom 
thcGre  '    •      ■  ''■•''•■ 621 

Foreign  Literary  lntelligenc 125,4 

Germany..... 125     ' 

Greece.. 

Holland 126 

Italy '   I    ' 

Foreign  Bolig  Lous]  120,202,      i,  601 

•    Germany.. 121 

Great  Britain 292-,  436,  <    I 

Mohammedanism 

Roman  Cath         ■  1 122 

Si.ain 1 

Sweden 122 

]\    <•  -r:  C1. :;-.;_. .  J "•irll v  ;  or.  '!"'.;•  II 

ofFalth '. 459 

Krer-v.i:.  I  ■  v 127 

Fulton:   Woman  as  God  made  her;  The 
True  V,'  oman 477 

Garden  of  Eden,  laterality  of  the  .' 

of  i  ho '• 883 

Integrity  oftbeSci  ipture  Eei  »rd • 

The   Edi  nic  Account   the  fc'lri  I  Link,  in 

History 83S 

Eefen  _  to  bv  I       ired  Writers.. . 

St.  Pan       ■ 840 

Tln=-  Mystic  V'i<  w  1 1"  Edi  o  shown  t<   be 

False 843 

And  Unti     •  ■  ■  • 341 

Gardner:  '                           '  r'.ieii'vd,  A  Ser- 
mon   5-24 

Garrett  Biblical  I  '  •••  47-1 

G<  ilogical  Evidences  of  tb  i  An    |  lit)   of 

Man PI 

Lii.-nsiriT!.'  ll:.:/.'   -i-.'ii 

Kitcbi  a  M    '  ■■   ■   99,  10? 

Limestone  Caveri  3 99 

Deltas 101,110 

Kivc-i   •..'-.  ..    1"';-  I1"! 

Tlu:  Cv.-if  ■.-.  :-  ]■•     ;i  Human  Skull. .105,  117 
Conclusion-...    'i-' 


Hteginson  :  Malbone Page  4S4 

Lit  r;.:>,  The  SfriC3 477 

1;  ■    .Monthly,.      160 

M  iod  :  !'  imp  .  I'ii   noi.;,  i  id  Ti  an  p 
■.  :  •'  !:•   "Hire  mid  Work  ofthi   ( 

tian  Ministry 616 

B     -    atHomi    I'hc 683 

I 

Physics  and  Hydranll     i 

siptiEivar-.... Pi 


M-    ':■■■   ■    '    '    '  ' 

.  Eield" 

v 

in 

Historj 

;  oal   Su]  <  i    ity  of  the  Hindoo 

I 


85 


1  '   ■    /.   ■".  :<■'■■>  SuhJtrutnin 06 


Social  Oreaniz  itli 

;  id  ■  in  Missionary  Enter- 

i   ise 

ical  Eei  iar_s 


The  Seen  t  of  Swedenborg 621 

:m  Delivered  ofTorciualoTaaso.T:.'-,       7 


James : 

••  ;  n  Delivered  of  Torquato'; 

Je  ft'ett :  Livingstone  in  Africa. . , 


' 


Glen  Eldi  c 

I  

G'-»  dwii, :  Dr.  1.  ■  .  

G.. ;..!.. in,  .i.,!,d.  :■        nRhilia  of 

Ori  v.  of  bi=  ": 

•n<  _;,.:.:;  ,--f  i  ii,  'i'i  tl  

His  -i;./  I       emed" 

Statement  of  li  D 

HlsTI  ption 

—  Oi  Ati  :     11     • 

Prodi  stiB  iti  ■ 

Ability  of  :     ■: 

Estimate  of  I 

Green:  Bib       Poll  .... .-•".    • 

Cm  nbsfi  l!-   ';" 

Ki  .    '  i''i 

Guthrie:  -  la        of<                ■    ■   '    ' ('  I 
Ti         ''''- 

.;        v  -                            orDoctrines  !!i 

1     :  ]'  - 

Hal  '  ,(  ; 

nail:  II  .......... !'•' 

namili  '                      •••■  lca 

Harkn.  : 

1     .      ■  '     ■ 

Harper's   _  ,":.V"    " 

H 

Hawlci  . 
Uenders      : 

M9 

Herald  of    II 

Culture,  Tin 160 

)i  bbai  i  .  v.  . 

line,  V  i> 627 


K  •  hi       4?4 

Kellogs:  Lion  Ben  of  Elm  Island 161 

k,  i  ;   The  D".v-!>  .v.;i,  .Mid  thi.-lii.iii 4'3 

Kinglake :  Th    luvasion  of  the  Crimea,  its 

"Origin,  etc MS 

■  ■  ; •:  David,  King  of  Israel 143 

Lacroix  :  Religion  and  the  Reign  of  Ter- 
ror  141,  569 

•.  i  tc 156 

:  1  :.'  -nncat  the  Time 

• 461 

Life  of  Jesus J.ol 

i  i 223 

Mulle'r.  March,  and   Whitney  ranked  to- 

22S 

i  .-  and  Import  of  Growth  in  Lan- 


■  ■ 


long  Phys- 
ical Sciences 

"Institution" 

!•:..,  ■  i  ' : r..-\  Hi  ..  -■  5 

!  ■  : 

dently  of  History 2-7!) 

etc 324 

Lecky :  History  ol   t'.mopi  in  Morals  ft-oia 

/,•_•.-  630 

4  - 

Liddun:  Wvi  >  ■ 

•  i-  --.-  <  hrist.  1ST 

Life  of  G  "-. 

i:  oberl  

Liii(i..n  :  Mtn-a.irei    A  ■  torj  ol   I 
l.i-il.-  :  >  

i  ■.  153 

j_-.--ii._- :  The   Piclorial  Field-book  of  the 

War  of  1812,  etc 

of  Luther  In  their 



Lyell:  i.                                                    .''•- 
ty  of  Man,  etc P4 

'    - 

ilLiter- 

I'1 

IM 

! 

4-l 

.      ■ 

r;-' 

Marsh:  Lectur««  oi 


639 


and  History  of  the  L 

Language i '-.  •■  25 : 

May:  Dotty  Dim]  161 

M.B    ■ herde  I*        -  ■ 

•'  -I!-!.  1  ■■<.<•:■■   I." 

Methodism  :  its  '.•■'    I       a:  1  Mi 

!       >  beol  a 

!hl  .... 

H-  '.I ::. ■■  I  i  .'.i      ;>       i  249 

1  ■    .    li      isi  .  253 

lb  .... 

Governim  ital  •  •  ssible    in    the 

Widesi  CI    ■  2C0 

Met] 

The  Mixed  Divine  •  Lif€ 264 

Its<  

The  J  tiiod  of  M  .  ■  '■  m  ■>  Inspiration, 

in  ]         ctio    '         !     -  .- 206 

Meth'  ■':':.  ':-,  Ar.i- 

c'       ai      ■  •  f  ti.t Z'Sj 

Metr  polisoftl  C8 

T.  cation  of  63 

dim.'".'  :.'  1  !:•.-     :•:,.-- 6o 

Growtii ■  . 

Schools  a v.J  Ghurci'-  ' 6S 

Prospecth  e  Prosperity 69 

.v-d  Ex- 
pository •  ■  ■•    Four 

i.i:  :.-    :  •    ■ .  !  .  •         ,       :.---■  .' 

i -•  :  \  .i-;  »n i  I 

Muller:  Cliipa  Jr.  m  aG 

Lectures  o 

Murdock  :   i;.  '. 

tory,  A:.. .                                    [Law- 
rence VonMotbeiai,  D.  D C20 

Nashville  Christ 

71 

V. 

Differ.  ■!••.  A'.t.!.--:i;  -.." 70 

l'cro  -io:r.  ;'s  Tc--:.ii:io:iy  of  the  two  Divis- 
ions ofKthi-pi.r.f 7C 

Sir  Henry  j    .                                  7- 

Tradition of Foi  ..:•- T9 

Ancient  t)[.i  .                                r 70 

'.  he  Q  u                       Ethiopian's  Degen- 
eration considered SI 

Fro  :'.-  •''.:.'                         •  ••-  &* 
: 
Negro  in 

counted  for EC 

The  Negro  •    ;                       Pro  Tf   - 51 

His  Future. 91 

Cliii         .'.  ' ' 

C!4 

:>'■-..  .'•.     . 

;"■ 

■.'  ', 

...6 

i  -  ......      9 

God's  i.. .- 

10 

. 

1! 

—  :.                                          ....    10 
In  theP<  '        28 

iii  oi 

lory 25 

Gre  t  Value  of 
• 

':  i 

N..Mh    \  ■       ■ 

North  Urftisb 
Noyes  :  'i1 
from  Hi.  I 




t  >ptl  ■ :  I  • 

Make  or  I  .... 


Farton:  Smoking  and  Dri.nkinr I" 

I 

Peirci      A.  Half 

470 

Phelps :  ] 

U.  E     Gr     '         ..  D 

1CS 

Ph  ■".:;.. 

of. ". 892 

.  ■  I     in 

America 893 

Time  reqi  :;.  id  t  •        Lial  Pho 



. 

iphy.. 

Plaw         ;■  .- .U'\ 

M  -  -  ■• 

■ 

I     ■  Insiro 

40S 

Piatt  :  ( 

;  Pulpit 160 

'...r  V-  pc ■    : 

■    •  817 

146 

f  of  J 

\ " 411 

Imp    ■ 

f  tin- 

I. ....... . 

: . 
420 

185,801,441,612 

is  of  Lord  Byron,  etc.,  I 

47-1 

-  .  l.w-.    By  the  D 

— 

French  Revolution 570 

...  :  7! 
. 

I  '-'i 

i 

■ 



I 

of  Public  Safety 

Attic 

Manner  in  which  Christiai 
this  seven  Mid  ,     I   .  • 

.  .  ■   •  ' 

M 

•     • 

.     '     ! 

I 
: 

........ 

I 

' 



: 

—  139 

IIU  i 

\ 

■ 
His  V-.     •  :  )    .  >    '  i 215 


6,10 


INDEX, 


g  hli  "        i  ol  freefromDo- 

terminisin Pago  218 

HisYieivs  of  Christ 219 

His  Mo  le  pn  vii  :  ofGod.  225 

WW.c.  1:  Ilu.  pee  of  hi-  'i  :i<   >i-   v 226 

Gi'i'i'    -.  ."'.u  l\    l'i    v,-n  j.b  Theolotry 

221 

• our  late  Article  on 0% 

Bcholl  n:   The  Oldest  n  on   the 

Writinffi  of  the  KewT.   i   m  al 468 

Scofi  '•  IJ  n-a-s 15-' 

Scott:  ]  '•-•    "  4S4 

Brai'b :  ical  "  etc 10-i 

Si  ■     d 

lor  ,  etc 460 

Bpui     i.n:  Eveni      l>y  I  •  .      ■  lu  -!■ 

in-  ?.t  i:vo:itia«... : 4 CO 

Bt\]  li.  ,   i    :  Kiitiken 188,    H,  60; 

Bund  ool   Journal  for   Teachers  and 

1'oung  People ICO 

Tauler,  Jol : .  -  45 

Moral  i).;r:<i.  •-<  of  iU   j  ."'  i..  eti.ii   Cen- 
tury    45 

"Frit  •  49 

Visit  ofNicbol    sof  Bai   I 60 

Tanler's  )"ir;i  Sermon  after  his  Conyer- 

]\.rser-.ri-.n  of  Lim  ani  his  A-  ...riuej...  M 

P    •     .i     iler 56 

His 'J  :••  "1  "•' 51 

His  .'       ropology 58 

His  -  ■        '  >L-y M 

Hi?  >.:!•:<.::!   -\i>U-in 60 

Tiivl^r:  I  :''.r.oy  and  Manhood  of  Christian 

'  Life -' 143 

I.e.  i  -  :ili  rion ;  or,  noi    '■■   be  !    ved..  142 

TeM:  of  :.  V:      .     '   '  i     !'\     '   '       I  rue  <  huich   I  -'"> 

•j  iie                                   Ministry  Scrip- 
tural    825 

do.;  ;n-   :.  with   Corinthian  Church  as 

to  Divine  Ap|    ii  tment 825 

Spiriti  nts 821 

IX- vos  d>i.  j-  in  Ollice 82.? 

Mr.nin.-i  of  Kveu.ti;,g  their  Ministry 829 

1  :  •"' 

s:k ■■     ■■'  v  •  "■ 8;'- 

Mel;.' -J:-i  1  :  '!>e  Fruit  of 

88i 


b  Quarterly  Boview. 


,  Tage  128,  299, 

■ 

V;  :  Oosterzee:  John's  Gospel,  Ipologetical 
Lectures 45T 

,- :  .'  m  ■  loti     ol  the  Wcsl<  ys 459 

-  —  Bold    I  :  <  : .  A  lVrtrull 

.  [  Rev.  We  Cravens,  of  Virg   '  10 

Archipelago 

V.  i    .   .in  I.  .   .:  'view 132,  3"1,  I  'T 



Dr.  >  I. S47 

:    slated I 

Hi-  i'l.v:  nf  i.  h  i.-;'i  -      in",  .  o:   t lie  Moui  -    . 

His  Doctrii  ..'  A  i  •-■.  ofDi  [iravltj SK.2 

—  of  the  Trinity 3.'  I 

—  of  the  Atonement "■' 

—  of  ]'.:.:  tisin ■■  '• 

—  ..-;  I':--  IHetribution 351 

—  of  1 

Dr.   Whedon's   Exp  -  tion  of  Matthew, 

(  ,    ip  er    XSiT 861 

lli  =  V.  .., '  .    ■    '': S62 

m     Pn           lTtterauces 3 

.  Vol.  Til,  No.  Ill,  Art.  III. 

i-   1          'l  ■    .; 818 

v:iiii.-\  :..  -.-    >■■.■■  ofs?   i'. ."     i  view. .3' 

W  :.;                            I  for 361 

J .>:•*, e  •  f  the  Mi^rK-re '■  '■ 

I'        I    :  :   I    > 

' 813 

P  '•<<'' 

" 3V 


Have  a  Chri 

Tl  .  i  y  and  Fl 

C 

<  .! 


•  '.re 

.... 

| 


j  -  Irgtoiana 4cf 

Vanity  i-':.ir 


Tbeodiev 

Bynoi         ■  "-''l-' 

.    .  .    ■  '      , 

""4 

Depravity   219 

2"'2 

Bcln  :•■ ""' 

-  -'j 

j  ...  Ish- 

inelii  <■'  i.-i.'.-rid 290 

j  '  :  •  Gcolo- 

C1T 

824 

')■  

Ti  ■  i  True  i 

r  501 

3' 

Twcnu 

live(       n  i  : 

rl 4^2 


')  he  "Coll    |u; 


834 


:  '  - 3^■7 

.lies  IX.  545 

The  I  oise 549 

i  ,:-'...'■■        ie CM 

-'  \X;\r'' 551 

Death  oft &"'5 

i    ie  t  of  the  Massacre 567 

,,:,a  tin    -      .   of  Laa- 

.   Travel  and  Advi  nture  in  the 

Territory  of  Alaska 811 

r.ie  ]);irk  to  the  Day....  163 

'  Seed W2 

SVii      ■  .      mmarofthe  1  liomsof  tl 

i  303 

Wi  idiniT-lv-.y  i:i  nil  Ages  and 


.    .. 

.'         

Morals  aud  Ethics  of  !' 

]    ;  .     oft      Chinese 

Brahmins 

ts 

!'  



opby 

— ' 

ti  ma, 





lau  Corn' 

i  



icj 

; 

Tbtol- 


.    .  •    i 




<±D 


6