Skip to main content

Full text of "Millais"

See other formats


:OO 


!OO 
100 


MASTERPIECES 
IN  COLOUR 
EDITED  BY  -  - 
T.  LEMAN  HARE 


MILLAIS 


IN  THI  SAME  SERIIS 


ARTIST. 
VELAZQUEZ. 
REYNOLDS. 
TURNER. 
ROMNEY. 
GREUZE. 
BOTTICELLI. 
ROSSETTI. 
BELLINI. 
FRA  ANGELICO. 
REMBRANDT. 
LEIGHTON. 
RAPHAEL. 
HOLMAN  HUNT. 
TITIAN 
MILLAIS. 
CARLO  DOLCI. 
GAINSBOROUGH. 
TINTORETTO. 
LUINL 

FRANZ  HALS. 
VAN  DYCK. 

LEONARDO  DA  VINCI. 
RUBENS. 
WHISTLER. 
HOLBEIN. 
BURNE-JONES. 
VIGEE  LE  BRUN. 
CHARDIN. 
FRAGONARD. 


AUTHOR. 
S.  L.  BKNSUSAN. 
S.  L.  BBNSUSAM. 
C  LEWIS  HIND. 
C.  LEWIS  HIND. 
AI.YS  EVRR  MACKLIN. 
HBNKV  B.  BINNS. 

LUCIBN    PlSSARRO. 

GEORGB  HAT. 
JAMBS  MASON. 

JOSEF    ISRABLS. 

A.  Lvs  BALDRT. 
PAUL  G.  KONODT. 
MARY  E.  COLERIDGE. 
S.  L.  BBNSUSAN. 
A.  Lvs  BALDRT. 
GBORGB  HAY. 
MAX  ROTHSCHILD. 
S.  L.  BBNSUSAN. 
JAMES  MASON. 
EDGCUMBE  STALKY. 
PERCY  M.  TURNER. 

M.    W.    B  ROCKWELL. 

S.  L.  BENSUSAN. 

T.  MARTIN  WOOD. 

S.  L.  BENSUSAN. 

A.  Lvs  BALDRY. 

C.  HALDANB  MACFALL. 

PAUL  G.  KONODV. 

C.  HALDANB  MACFALL. 


In  Preparation 


J.  F.  MILLET. 

MEMLINC. 

ALBERT  DURER. 

CONSTABLE. 

RAEBURN. 

BOUCHER. 

WATTEAU. 

MURILLO. 


PERCY  M.  TURNER. 
W.  H.  JAMBS  WBALB. 
HERBERT  FURST. 
C.  LEWIS  HIND. 
JAMBS  L.  CAW. 
C.  HALDANB  MACFALL. 
C  LEWIS  HIND. 
S.  L.  BBNSUSAN. 


JOHN  S.  SARGENT,  R.A.  T.  MARTIN  WOOD. 

AND  OTHERS- 


PLATE  I.-THE  ORDER  OF  RELEASE.     Frontispiece 
(Tate  Gallery) 

This  is  one  of  the  pictures  which  Millais  always  reckoned  among 
the  greatest  of  all  his  successes,  and  that  it  has  many  notable 
qualities  which  justify  his  preference  can  certainly  not  be  denied.  It 
is  wonderful  in  its  earnest  and  thoughtful  realism,  and  it  explains  its 
motive  with  a  completeness  that  is  most  convincing.  The  expres- 
sion on  the  face  of  the  woman  who  brings  the  order  which  frees  her 
husband  from  prison  is  singularly  happy  in  its  combination  of 
tenderness  for  the  wounded  Highlander,  and  triumph  over  the  hesi- 
tating gaoler;  and  there  are  many  other  little  touches,  like  the 
joyous  effusiveness  of  the  dog,  and  the  unconsciousness  of  the 
sleeping  child,  which  amplify  and  perfect  the  pictorial  story. 


Millais 

BY  A.  LYS  BALDRY  $  ®  ® 
ILLUSTRATED  WITH  EIGHT 
REPRODUCTIONS  IN  COLOUR 


LONDON:     T.     C.     &     E.     C.     JACK 
NEW  YORK:  FREDERICK  A.  STOKES  CO. 


HP 


JU          966 


1097425 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 

Plate 

I.  The  Order  of  Release,  1746      .         Frontispiece 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

Page 

II.  The  Boyhood  of  Raleigh  .        .        .        .14 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

III.  The  Knight  Errant 24 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

IV.  Autumn  Leaves 34 

At  Manchester  Art  Gallery 

V.  Speak  !    Speak ! 40 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

VI.  The  Vale  of  Rest 50 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

VII.  Ophelia 60 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 

VIII.  The  North-West  Passage        .        .        .      70 

At  the  Tate  Gallery 


AS  a  record  of  some  half  century  of 
xY.  brilliant  activity,  and  of  practically 
unbroken  success,  the  life-story  of  John 
Everett  Millais  is  in  many  respects 
unlike  those  which  can  be  told  about 
the  majority  of  artists  who  have  played 
great  parts  in  the  modern  art  world.  He 

Tf 


II 


12  MILLAIS 

had  none  of  the  hard  struggle  for  recogni- 
tion, or  of  the  fight  against  adverse  circum- 
stances, which  have  too  often  embittered 
the  earlier  years  of  men  destined  to  take 
eventually  the  highest  rank  in  their  profes- 
sion. Things  went  well  with  him  from  the 
first;  he  gained  attention  at  an  age  when 
most  painters  have  barely  begun  to  make 
a  bid  for  popularity,  and  his  position  was 
assured  almost  before  he  had  arrived  at 
man's  estate.  He  owed  some  of  his  success, 
no  doubt,  to  his  attractive  and  vigorous 
personality,  but  it  was  due  in  far  greater 
measure  to  the  extraordinary  powers  which 
he  manifested  from  the  very  outset  of  his 
career. 

For  there  was  something  almost  sensa- 
tional in  the  manner  of  his  development,  in 
his  unusual  precocity,  and  in  the  youthful 


PLATE  II.-THE  BOYHOOD  OF  RALEIGH 
(Tate  Gallery) 

It  would  not  be  inappropriate  to  describe  the  "  Boyhood  of 
Raleigh  "  as  the  prologue  to  the  romance  of  which  the  last  chapter  is 
written  in  the  "  North-West  Passage,"  for  in  both  pictures  the  artist 
suggests  the  fascination  of  the  adventurous  life.  Young  Raleigh  and 
his  boy  friend  are  under  the  spell  of  the  story  which  the  sailor  is 
telling  them,  a  story  evidently  of  engrossing  interest  and  stimulating 
to  the  imagination.  The  faces  of  the  lads  show  how  inspiring  they 
find  this  tale  of  strange  experiences  in  lands  beyond  the  sea. 


MILLAIS  15 

self-confidence  which  enabled  him  to  take 
a  prominent  place  among  the  leaders  of 
artistic  opinion  while  he  was  still  little 
more  than  a  boy.  So  early  was  the  proof 
given  that  he  possessed  absolutely  uncom- 
mon powers,  that  he  was  not  more  than 
nine  years  old  when  he  began  serious  art 
training;  and  so  evident  even  then  was  his 
destiny  that  this  training  was  commenced 
on  the  advice  of  Sir  Martin  Archer  Shee, 
the  President  of  the  Royal  Academy,  to 
whom  the  child's  performances  had  been 
submitted  by  parents  anxious  for  an  expert 
opinion.  The  President's  declaration  when 
he  saw  these  early  efforts,  that  "nature 
had  provided  for  the  boy's  success,"  was 
emphatic  enough  to  dissipate  any  doubts 
there  might  have  been  whether  or  not 
young  Millais  was  to  be  encouraged  in  his 


16  MILLAIS 

artistic  inclinations ;  and  that  this  emphasis 
was  justified  by  subsequent  results  no  one 
to-day  can  dispute. 

The  family  from  which  Millais  sprang 
was  not  one  with  any  past  record  of  art 
achievement.  His  ancestors  were  men  of 
action  and  inclined  rather  to  be  fighters 
than  students  of  the  arts.  They  were  Nor- 
mans who  had  settled  in  Jersey,  and  had 
for  several  hundred  years  been  counted 
among  the  more  important  landholders  in 
that  island,  where  at  different  times  they 
held  several  estates.  From  these  ances- 
tors Millais  derived  his  energetic  tem- 
perament and  that  militant  activity  which 
enabled  him  in  his  career  as  an  artist  to 
triumph  signally  over  established  preju- 
dices —  the  qualities  which  undoubtedly 
helped  him  to  make  his  power  felt  even 


MILLAIS  17 

by    the    people    who    were    most    opposed 
to  him. 

He  was  born  on  June  8th,  1829,  at 
Southampton,  where  his  parents  were  tem- 
porarily living,  but  his  earliest  years  were 
spent  in  Jersey.  It  was  in  1835  that  he 
began  to  show  definitely  his  artistic  in- 
clinations; he  was  at  Dinan  then  with  his 
parents  and  he  amused  himself  there  by 
making  sketches  of  the  country  and  people 
with  success  so  remarkable  that  even 
strangers  did  not  hesitate  to  recognise  him 
as  a  budding  genius.  Three  years  later 
this  estimate  was  confirmed  by  Sir  Martin 
Archer  Shee,  and  the  boy  was  then  sent  to 
work  at  the  art  school  which  Henry  Sass 
carried  on  in  Bloomsbury,  a  school  which 
had  at  that  time  a  considerable  reputation 
as  a  training  place  for  art  students,  and  in 


i8  MILLAIS 

which  most  of  the  early  Victorian  painters 
received  their  preliminary  education. 

Soon  after  he  entered  this  school  Millais 
gave  a  very  striking  proof  of  his  precocious 
ability— he  gained  the  silver  medal  of  the 
Society  of  Arts  for  a  drawing  of  the  an- 
tique, and  an  amusing  story  is  told  of  the 
sensation  he  created  when  he  appeared  at 
the  prize-giving  to  receive  his  award.  The 
Duke  of  Sussex  was  presiding  at  the  meet- 
ing, and  to  his  amazement,  when  the  name 
of  "Mr  Millais"  was  called,  a  small  child 
presented  himself  as  the  winner  of  the 
medal.  To  amazement  succeeded  admira- 
tion when  a  consultation  with  the  officials 
of  the  Society  proved  that  this  boy  of  nine 
was  really  the  successful  competitor,  and 
the  presentation  was  received  with  great 
applause  by  the  spectators  of  the  scene. 


MILLAIS  19 

After  two  years'  work  under  Sass,  with 
some  study  in  the  British  Museum  in  ad- 
dition, he  was  admitted  into  the  schools  of 
the  Royal  Academy,  and,  though  his  age 
then  was  only  eleven,  he  began  almost 
immediately  to  prove  how  well  he  could 
hold  his  own  in  this  new  sphere  of  ac- 
tivity. During  the  six  years  over  which 
his  studentship  at  the  Academy  extended 
he  won  every  prize  for  which  he  competed, 
and  carried  off  finally  the  gold  medal  for 
historical  painting  with  a  picture  of  "The 
Tribe  of  Benjamin  Seizing  the  Daughters 
of  Shiloh."  This  was  in  1847;  in  the  pre- 
vious year  he  had  made  his  first  appear- 
ance as  an  exhibitor  at  the  Academy  with 
an  ambitious  composition,  "Pizarro  Seizing 
the  Inca  of  Peru,"  which  is  now  in  the 
Victoria  and  Albert  Museum.  His  most 


20  MILLAIS 

ambitious  effort  at  this  period  was,  how- 
ever, the  design,  "The  Widow  Bestowing 
her  Mite,"  which  he  produced  in  1847  f°r 
the  Westminster  Hall  competition,  a  vast 
canvas  crowded  with  life-sized  figures  which 
was  remarkable  enough  to  have  made  the 
reputation  of  a  far  older  and  more  experi- 
enced painter. 

So  far  his  progress  had  been  without 
interruption.  The  rare  brilliancy  of  his 
student  career  had  gained  him  the  fullest 
approval  of  his  fellow-workers  in  art,  and 
he  was  beginning  his  career  as  a  producer 
with  every  prospect  of  becoming  immedi- 
ately one  of  the  most  popular  artists  of  his 
time.  Everything  was  in  his  favour;  he 
had  undeniable  ability,  good  health,  and  an 
attractive  personality,  and  he  had  proved 
in  many  ways  that,  young  as  he  was,  he 


MILLAIS  21 

could  handle  large  undertakings  with  sound 
judgment  and  complete  confidence.  Yet, 
with  what  seemed  to  be  his  way  smooth 
before  him,  he  did  not  hesitate  to  risk  his 
already  assured  position  in  the  art  world 
by  setting  himself  openly  in  opposition  to 
the  opinions  of  practically  all  the  men 
who  were  then  counted  as  the  leaders  of 
his  profession.  That  he  knew  what  might 
be  the  penalty  he  would  have  to  pay  for 
this  rebellion  against  the  fashion  of  the 
moment  can  scarcely  be  doubted,  but  he 
was  by  nature  too  strenuous  a  fighter  to 
be  daunted  by  dangerous  possibilities,  and 
his  convictions,  once  formed,  were  always 
too  strong  to  yield  to  any  considerations 
of  expediency. 

In    1848,    he   and   two   friends   of  about 
his  own  age,  Dante  Gabriel  Rossetti,  and 


22  MILLAIS 

William  Holman  Hunt,  conceived  the  idea 
of  making  a  practical  protest  against  the 
inefficiency  of  the  work  which  was  being 
done  by  the  more  popular  artists  of  the 
time.  The  three  youths  had  come  under 
the  influence  of  Ford  Madox  Brown,  who 
with  splendid  sincerity  was  labouring  to 
realise  an  ideal  based  not  upon  fashion, 
but  upon  an  earnest  desire  for  truthful 
expression,  and  by  his  example  they  were 
induced  to  study  a  purer  type  of  art  than 
any  they  could  see  about  them.  For  this 
purer  art  they  turned  to  the  works  of 
the  Italian  Primitives,  whose  childlike  un- 
conventionality  and  unhesitating  naturalism 
touched  a  responsive  chord  in  the  natures 
of  these  youths  who  still  retained  some  of 
the  simple  faith  in  reality  which  is  one  of 
the  charms  of  childhood.  They  decided 


PLATE  III.— THE  KNIGHT  ERRANT 
(Tate  Gallery) 

It  is  generally  recognised  that  the  effective  representation  of  the 
nude  figure  imposes  the  severest  test  not  only  upon  an  artist's 
powers  of  drawing  and  painting  but  upon  his  sense  of  aesthetic 
propriety  as  well.  The  "  Knight  Errant  "  proves  beyond  dispute 
that  Millais  was  able  to  pass  this  test  triumphantly,  for  the  picture 
is  a  magnificent  technical  achievement  and  is  absolutely  discreet  in 
treatment.  The  subject,  a  lady  rescued  from  robbers  by  a  wandering 
knight,  is  one  which  occurs  frequently  in  mediaeval  romance. 


MILLAIS  25 

that  for  the  future  they  would  base  their  own 
practice  upon  that  of  the  early  Italians, 
and  that  they  would  have  none  of  the  artifi- 
cialities of  the  age  in  which  they  found 
themselves.  Their  resolve  was  a  bold  one, 
but  the  manner  in  which  they  proceeded  to 
make  it  effective  was  bolder  still. 

They  organised  an  association,  the  title 
of  which,  "The  Pre-Raphaelite  Brother- 
hood," significantly  asserted  the  nature  of 
their  artistic  aims,  and  as  the  founders  of 
this  association  they  pledged  themselves  to 
seek  the  inspiration  of  their  art  in  those 
Italian  painters  who  had  lived  before 
Raphael  was  born,  and  whose  sterling 
principles  were  abandoned  by  Raphael  and 
his  successors.  To  the  three  founders  of 
the  Brotherhood  were  joined  two  other 
painters,  James  Collinson,  and  F.  G. 


26  MILLAIS 

Stephens,  a  sculptor,  Thomas  Woolner  and 
Dante  Gabriel  Rossetti's  brother,  William 
Michael,  who,  being  a  writer,  was  given 
the  office  of  secretary.  The  Brotherhood, 
so  constituted,  was  formally  inaugurated  in 
the  autumn  of  1848,  and  the  members  at 
once  set  to  work  to  prove  by  their  acts 
the  reality  of  their  belief  in  the  creed  they 
had  adopted. 

The  first  fruits  of  the  movement  were 
seen  in  the  following  spring  at  the  Aca- 
demy where  Millais,  who  was  then,  it  must 
be  remembered,  not  quite  twenty,  exhi- 
bited his  "  Lorenzo  and  Isabella,"  a  picture 
striking  in  its  originality  and  in  its  unusual 
power.  What  it  implied  was  not,  however, 
immediately  realised  by  the  public ;  that 
the  manner  of  the  painting  made  it  very 
unlike  those  by  which  it  was  surrounded 


MILLAIS  27 

was  generally  recognised,  but  most  people, 
if  they  thought  about  the  matter  at  all, 
seem  to  have  assumed  that  the  painter 
had  failed  to  bring  himself  into  line  with 
the  art  of  his  time  through  youthful  inex- 
perience rather  than  by  deliberate  inten- 
tion. Time  and  practice,  they  considered, 
would  correct  such  deficiencies  in  taste  as 
were  apparent  in  the  "Lorenzo  and  Isa- 
bella," and  when  the  lad  had  arrived  at 
years  of  discretion  he  would  be  the  first 
to  see  the  necessity  for  amendment 

But  the  members  of  the  Brotherhood, 
probably  feeling  that  their  initial  effort  had 
not  produced  quite  the  effect  intended, 
took  other  steps  to  define  their  attitude. 
They  started,  in  January  1850,  a  magazine 
called  The  Germ,  which  was  proffered 
as  the  organ  of  the  new  movement.  It 


28  MILLAIS 

was  sufficiently  uncompromising  in  its  con- 
fession of  faith,  and  neither  its  text  nor 
its  illustrations  were  wanting  in  clearness 
of  statement.  The  magazine,  indeed,  was 
what  it  was  intended  to  be,  an  open  chal- 
lenge to  all  the  advocates  of  the  old  order 
of  things;  and  as  such  it  was  taken  by 
the  people  who  saw  it.  It  was  only  in  ex- 
istence for  four  months,  but  even  in  that 
short  time  it  did  its  work  thoroughly,  and 
put  an  end  to  any  doubts  there  were  in 
the  minds  of  art  lovers  and  art  workers 
concerning  the  meaning  of  Pre-Raphael- 
itism ;  thenceforward  Millais  and  his  friends 
had  certainly  no  reason  to  complain  of 
being  ignored. 

The  attention  which  was  given  to  the 
pictures  they  sent  to  the  1850  Academy  ex- 
hibition was,  however,  by  no  means  what 


MILLAIS  29 

they  desired,  though,  doubtless,  it  must  have 
been  much  what  they  expected.  Millais 
exhibited  a  "Portrait  of  a  Gentleman 
and  his  Grandchild,''  "Ferdinand  Lured  by 
Ariel,"  and  "Christ  in  the  House  of  His 
Parents "  —  better  known  as  "The  Car- 
penter's Shop" — and  these  visible  embodi- 
ments of  the  principles  laid  down  in  The 
Germ  were  received  with  an  absolute 
storm  of  abuse.  The  audacity  of  the 
young  painters  who  sought  by  works  of 
this  character  to  discredit  the  smug  and 
artificial  respectability  of  the  art  which  was 
then  in  vogue  excited  the  critics  beyond 
control  and  brought  forth  a  veritable  orgie 
of  virulent  expostulation. 

Millais,  with  his  mind  made  up  and  his 
fighting  instinct  fully  roused,  was  not  the 
man  to  yield  to  clamour.  He  made  no  con- 


30  MILLAIS 

cessions,  but,  loyally  supporting  the  policy 
of  the  Brotherhood,  showed  at  the  Aca- 
demy in  1851  "The  Woodman's  Daughter," 
"Mariana  in  the  Moated  Grange,"  and 
"The  Return  of  the  Dove  to  the  Ark,"  all 
of  which  were  as  frank  in  their  Pre- 
Raphaelitism  as  any  of  the  previous  year's 
canvases,  and  all  of  which  were  greeted 
with  even  more  vehement  disapproval  by 
the  literary  custodians  of  the  popular  taste. 
Every  possible  kind  of  misrepresentation 
of  the  aims  of  the  young  painter  and  his 
friends  was  employed  to  discredit  their 
efforts,  all  sorts  of  base  motives  were  im- 
puted to  them ;  ridicule,  specious  argument, 
and  insult  were  used  in  turn  to  drive  them 
from  the  course  they  had  deliberately 
chosen.  Appeals  were  even  made  to  the 
Academy  to  have  the  pictures,  round 


MILLAIS  31 

which  this  controversy  was  raging,  re- 
moved summarily  from  the  exhibition  as 
things  unfit  to  be  set  before  the  eyes  of 
the  public.  But  fortunately  the  courage 
of  the  Brotherhood  was  proof  against 
everything  which  the  opposition  could  do, 
and  neither  abuse  nor  threats  had  any 
effect.  Yet  Millais  at  the  time  suffered  for 
his  principles;  paintings  which  had  been 
commissioned  were  thrown  upon  his  hands, 
and  his  pictures  almost  ceased  to  be  sale- 
able. He  had  every  proof  that  his  Pre- 
Raphaelitism  was  commercially  a  mistake 
and  that,  if  he  persisted,  the  absolute 
marring  of  his  career  as  a  popular  painter, 
was  more  than  likely,  yet,  so  stubborn 
was  his  conviction  that  he  made  no  change 
in  either  his  principles  or  his  practice. 
Happily,  as  time  went  on,  the  position 


32  MILLAIS 

of  affairs  began  to  improve ;  the  opposition 
exhausted  itself  by  excess  of  violence,  and 
able  champions  of  the  movement  took  up 
the  cudgels  in  defence  of  the  young  artists. 
One  of  the  most  authoritative  of  these 
champions  was  Ruskin,  who  found  in  this 
apparently  forlorn  hope  infinite  possibilities 
of  artistic  progress,  and  whose  declaration 
that  the  Pre-Raphaelites  were  laying  "the 
foundations  of  a  school  of  art  nobler  than 
the  world  has  seen  for  three  hundred  years  " 
generously  expressed  his  sentiments  to- 
wards the  Brotherhood.  He  took  the 
trouble  to  study  their  art,  and  to  analyse 
their  motives,  so  that  he  based  his  advocacy 
not  upon  vague  sympathy  but  upon  real 
understanding  of  artistic  principles  which 
were  sane  and  sound  enough  to  satisfy  even 
his  exacting  demand  for  purity  of  aesthetic 


PLATE  IV.-AUTUMN   LEAVES 
(Manchester  Art  Gallery) 

As  an  example  of  the  quiet  and  unforced  sentiment  which  charac- 
terises so  many  of  the  pictures  which  Millais  painted,  this  delightful 
composition  deserves  particular  consideration.  It  has  a  certain 
severity  of  design  and  solemnity  of  manner,  but  in  its  suggestion  of 
the  sadness  of  autumn  there  is  no  trace  of  morbid  sentimentality  and 
no  kind  of  theatrical  effect.  The  picture  is  a  sort  of  allegory  ex- 
pressed with  exquisite  tenderness,  and  with  a  simple  frankness  of 
manner  which  is  especially  persuasive. 


MILLAIS  35 

purpose.  That  the  ultimate  success  of  Pre- 
Raphaelitism  was  due  to  his  energetic  in- 
terposition cannot,  of  course,  be  claimed— 
the  boldness  and  tenacity  of  the  artists 
who  had  adopted  the  new  creed  had  more  to 
do  with  the  improvement  which  was  brought 
about  in  the  popular  attitude — but  Ruskin's 
counter  attack  upon  the  critics  had  a  valu- 
able effect,  and  undoubtedly  helped  greatly 
to  open  the  eyes  of  the  public. 

It  is  interesting,  too,  to  note  that  just  at 
the  moment  when  the  attack  was  fiercest 
the  Royal  Academy  showed  its  faith  in 
Millais  by  electing  him  an  Associate.  He 
is  said  to  have  been  the  youngest  student 
.ever  received  into  the  Academy  schools, 
and  he  must  have  been  one  of  the  youngest 
painters  ever  chosen  as  an  Associate,  for 
after  his  election  it  was  discovered  that  he 


36  MILLAIS 

had  not  reached  the  age  at  which,  under 
the  Academy  rules,  admission  to  the  Asso- 
ciateship  was  possible.  So  his  election  had 
to  be  declared  invalid  and  he  had  to  wait 
some  few  years  longer — until  1853 — for  the 
official  recognition  of  his  claims.  But  it 
must  assuredly  be  counted  to  the  credit  of 
the  Academy  that  such  readiness  should 
have  been  shown  to  admit  the  ability  of  a 
young  artist  who  was  openly  in  rebellion 
against  the  fashions  of  his  time,  and  whose 
work  was  by  implication  a  condemnation 
of  much  that  was  being  done  even  by 
members  of  the  Academic  circle. 

His  election  in  1853  came  more  as  a 
matter  of  course;  by  that  date  he  had 
won  his  way  to  a  position  which  could 
scarcely  be  questioned  even  by  the  bitterest 
opponents  of  Pre-Raphaelitism,  and  he  had 


MILLAIS  37 

laid  securely  the  foundations  of  that  re- 
markable popularity  which  he  was  destined 
to  enjoy  for  the  rest  of  his  life.  It  would 
have  been  hard,  indeed,  to  deny  that  he 
deserved  whatever  rewards  were  due  to 
artistic  merit  of  the  highest  order,  for  his 
pictures  had  passed  well  beyond  the  stage 
of  brilliant  promise  into  that  of  command- 
ing achievement.  His  "Ophelia"  and  "The 
Huguenot "  in  1852,  his  "  Order  of  Release  " 
and  "The  Proscribed  Royalist"  in  1853, 
and  his  exquisite  "  Portrait  of  Mr.  Ruskin " 
in  1854,  are  to  be  accounted  as  masterly 
performances  which  would  have  done  full 
credit  to  a  painter  whose  skill  had  been 
matured  by  more  than  half  a  lifetime  of 
strenuous  effort,  and  which,  as  the  produc- 
tions of  a  young  man  who  did  not  reach 
his  twenty-fifth  birthday  until  the  summer 


38  MILLAIS 

of  1854,  are  of  really  extraordinary  import- 
ance. The  "Ophelia,"  "The  Huguenot," 
and  "The  Order  of  Release,"  can  be  placed, 
indeed,  among  the  most  memorable  ex- 
positions of  his  artistic  conviction,  and  the 
"Portrait  of  Mr.  Ruskin"  ranks  with  the 
"Ophelia"  as  one  of  the  most  astonishing 
examples  of  searching  and  faithful  study 
which  can  be  found  in  modern  art. 

These  pictures  were  followed  closely  by 
others  not  less  notable — by  "The  Rescue" 
in  1855,  by  "Autumn  Leaves,"  "The  Random 
Shot,"  "The  Blind  Girl,"  and  "Peace  Con- 
cluded," in  1856,  and  by  "Sir  Isumbras  at 
the  Ford,"  "The  Escape  of  a  Heretic,"  and 
"News  from  Home,"  in  1857.  Of  this  group 
"Sir  Isumbras  at  the  Ford"  was  the  least 
successful,  but  "Autumn  Leaves,"  with  its 
exquisite  delicacy  of  sentiment,  and  those 


PLATE  V. -SPEAK  1   SPEAK! 
(Tate  Gallery) 

To  the  man  who  has  loved  and  lost,  the  vision  of  his  lady  appear- 
ing to  him  as  he  lies  awake  at  dawn  seems  so  real  and  living  that 
he  begs  her  to  speak  to  him,  and  stretches  out  his  arms  to  clasp 
what  is  after  all  only  a  creation  of  his  imagination.  The  dramatic 
feeling  of  the  picture  is  as  convincing  as  its  pathos ;  the  painter  has 
grasped  completely  the  possibilities  of  his  subject,  and  he  tells  his 
story  with  just  the  touch  of  mystery  needed  to  give  it  due  signifi- 
cance. The  management  of  the  light  and  shade,  and  of  the  contrast 
between  the  warm  lamplight  and  the  greyness  of  the  early  morning, 
is  full  of  both  power  and  subtlety. 


MILLAIS  41 

two  delightful  little  canvases,  "The  Blind 
Girl,"  and  "The  Random  Shot,"  are  of 
supreme  interest  both  on  account  of  the 
depth  of  thought  which  they  reveal  and  of 
their  splendid  executive  accomplishment. 

Another  great  picture  appeared  in  1859 
—"The  Vale  of  Rest,"  which  differed  from 
most  of  the  works  which  Millais  had  hitherto 
produced  in  its  larger  qualities  of  handling 
and  more  serious  symbolism.  Its  special 
importance  was  not  fully  realised  by  the 
artist's  admirers  when  it  was  first  exhibited, 
but  Millais  himself  looked  upon  it  as  the 
best  thing  he  had  done ;  and  this  opinion 
has  since  been  generally  recognised  as  suffi- 
ciently well  founded.  He  had  not  before 
shown  so  much  solemnity  of  feeling  nor 
quite  so  complete  a  grasp  of  the  larger 
pictorial  essentials,  though  in  "Autumn 


42  MILLAIS 

Leaves"  there  was  decidedly  more  than  a 
hint  of  the  seriousness  of  purpose  which 
gave  authority  and  dignity  of  style  to  "The 
Vale  of  Rest." 

There  was  at  this  time  a  change  coming 
over  his  art,  a  change  which  suggested 
that  the  stricter  limits  of  Pre-Raphaelitism 
were  a  little  too  narrow  for  him  now  that 
his  youthful  enthusiasms  were  being  re- 
placed by  the  more  tolerant  ideas  of  mental 
maturity.  But  he  was  in  no  haste  to 
abandon  his  earlier  principles;  he  sought 
rather  to  find  how  they  might  be  widened 
to  cover  artistic  motives  which  scarcely 
came  within  the  scope  of  the  creed  to 
which  the  Brotherhood  had  originally  been 
pledged.  So  he  alternated  between  the 
literalism  of  "The  Black  Brunswicker" 
(1860),  "The  White  Cockade"  (1862),  "My 


MILLAIS  43 

First  Sermon  "  (1863),  "  My  Second  Sermon  " 
(1864),  and  "Asleep"  and  "Awake,"  which 
were  shown  in  1867  with  that  daintiest  of 
all  his  earlier  paintings,  "  The  Minuet,"  and 
the  sombre  suggestion  of  such  imaginative 
pictures  as  "The  Enemy  Sowing  Tares," 
and  the  finely  conceived  "  Eve  of  St.  Agnes," 
of  which  the  former  was  exhibited  at  the 
Academy  in  1865,  and  the  latter  in  1863.  It 
seemed  as  if  he  was  trying  to  make  up  his 
mind  as  to  the  direction  he  was  to  take 
for  the  future,  testing  his  powers  in  various 
ways,  and  studying  himself  to  see  how  his 
wishes  and  his  temperament  could  best  be 
brought  into  accord. 

But  when  in  1868  he  broke  into  the  new 
art  world  in  which  he  was  to  reign  supreme 
for  nearly  thirty  years,  his  abandonment  of 
the  technical  methods  which  he  had  adopted 


44  MILLAIS 

in  1849,  an(*  used  ever  since  with  compara- 
tively little  modification,  was  as  decisive  as 
it  was  surprising.  In  1867  he  was  the 
careful,  searching,  and  literal  student  of 
small  details,  precise  in  brushwork,  and 
exactly  realistic  in  his  record  of  what 
he  had  microscopically  examined.  His 
"  Asleep "  and  "  Awake  "  were  in  his  most 
matter-of-fact  vein,  almost  pedantically 
accurate  in  statement  of  obvious  facts ;  and 
even  his  charming  "  Minuet"  was  elaborated 
with  a  care  that  left  nothing  for  the  imagi- 
nation to  supply.  In  1868,  however,  all 
this  dwelling  upon  little  things,  all  this 
studied  minuteness  of  touch  and  literal  pre- 
sentation of  what  was  obvious,  had  suddenly 
disappeared.  All  that  remained  to  him  of 
his  Pre-Raphaelitism  was  the  acuteness  of 
vision  which  had  served  him  so  well  for 


MILLAIS  45 

twenty  years  in  his  intimate  examination 
of  nature;  everything  else  had  gone,  his 
minute  actuality  was  replaced  by  large  and 
generous  suggestion,  his  restrained  brush- 
work  by  the  broadest  and  most  emphatic 
handling,  his  realistic  view  by  a  kind  of 
magnificent  impressionism  which  expressed 
rightly  enough  the  personal  robustness  of 
the  man  himself. 

What  made  this  change  the  more  dra- 
matic was  the  absence  of  any  suggestion 
in  his  previous  work  that  he  was  prepar- 
ing for  an  executive  departure  of  such  a 
marked  kind.  A  diversion  into  a  new  class 
of  subjects,  or  an  inclination  towards  a 
more  serious  type  of  sentiment,  might  per- 
haps have  been  looked  for  from  the  painter 
of  "The  Vale  of  Rest,"  "The  Enemy  Sow- 
ing Tares,"  and  "The  Eve  of  St.  Agnes," 


46  MILLAIS 

but  even  in  the  larger  manner  of  these 
pictures,  there  was  little  to  imply  that  he 
desired  to  adopt  a  new  mode  of  paint- 
ing. But  if  the  "Souvenir  of  Velazquez," 
"Stella,"  "The  Pilgrims  to  St.  Paul's,"  and 
"The  Sisters,"  which  he  contributed  to 
the  1868  Academy,  are  compared  with  what 
he  had  done  before,  the  full  significance 
of  his  action  can  be  perceived. 

The  "Souvenir  of  Velazquez,"  indeed, 
is  one  of  the  most  decisive  pieces  of  fluent 
brushwork  which  has  been  produced  by 
any  modern  painter  of  the  British  school. 
It  is  entirely  convincing  in  its  directness 
and  in  its  summariness  of  executive  sug- 
gestion, and  as  a  masterly  performance  it 
is  by  no  means  unworthy  to  stand  beside 
the  works  of  that  master  to  whom  it  was 
in  some  sort  designed  as  a  tribute.  But 


MILLAIS  47 

it  has  a  peculiarly  English  charm  which 
Millais  grafted  with  happy  discretion  on 
to  the  technical  manner  of  the  Spanish 
school,  and  as  a  study  of  childish  grace  it 
is  almost  inimitably  persuasive.  The  little 
princesses  whom  Velazquez  painted  were 
too  often  robbed  of  their  daintiness  by  the 
formality  of  the  surroundings  in  which  it 
was  their  misfortune  to  be  placed,  but  the 
child  in  this  picture  by  Millais  has  lost 
none  of  her  freshness,  and,  with  all  her 
finery,  is  still  a  happy,  young,  little  thing, 
ready  for  a  romp  as  soon  as  the  sitting  is 
over.  In  the  long  series  of  fascinating 
studies  of  child-life  which  he  painted  with 
quite  exquisite  sympathy,  this  one  claims 
a  place  of  particular  prominence  on  ac- 
count of  its  beauty  of  characterisation,  and 
its  entire  absence  of  affectation,  quite  as 


48  MILLAIS 

much  as  it  does  on  account  of  its  qualities 
as  a  consummate  exercise  in  craftsmanship. 

This  was  the  canvas  which  he  finally 
decided  to  hand  over  to  the  Academy  as 
his  diploma  work.  He  had  been  promoted 
to  the  rank  of  Academician  in  1863,  and 
his  intention  then  was  to  be  represented 
in  the  Diploma  Gallery  by  "The  Enemy 
Sowing  Tares,"  which  he  regarded  as  in 
every  way  a  sound  example  of  his  powers. 
But  his  fellow-Academicians,  for  some  not 
very  intelligible  reason,  did  not  agree  with 
him  about  the  suitability  of  this  picture, 
and  it  was,  therefore,  refused.  So  he  sent 
them  the  "  Souvenir  of  Velazquez  "  instead, 
a  fortunate  choice,  for  it  brought  perma- 
nently into  a  quasi-public  gallery  what  is 
indisputably  an  achievement  worthy  of  him 
at  his  best. 


PLATE  VI.-THE  VALE  OF   REST 
(Tate  Gallery) 

None  of  the  pictures  which  can  be  assigned  to  the  period  when 
Millais  was  still  a  strict  adherent  to  the  Pre-Raphaelite  creed  can  be 
said  to  surpass  "The  Vale  of  Rest  "  in  depth  and  purity  of  feeling  ; 
and  certainly  none  expresses  better  in  its  character  and  manner  of 
treatment  the  artist's  conception.  The  same  exquisite  sentiment, 
sincere  and  dignified,  which  distinguishes  "  Autumn  Leaves  "  gives 
to  "  The  Vale  of  Rest "  an  absorbing  interest ;  and  the  way  in 
which  every  detail  of  the  composition  and  every  subtlety  in  the 
arrangement  and  expression  of  the  subject  have  been  used  to 
enhance  the  effect  which  the  artist  intended  to  produce,  claims 
unqualified  admiration. 


MILLAIS  51 

Once  started  on  his  new  direction  as 
a  painter  he  went  forward  with  unhesi- 
tating confidence  in  his  ability  to  realise 
his  intentions,  and  as  the  years  passed 
by  he  added  picture  after  picture  to  the 
already  large  company  of  his  successes. 
His  admirers,  surprised  as  they  were  at 
first  by  his  startling  change  of  manner,  did 
not  hesitate  to  accept  what  he  had  to 
offer;  indeed  the  splendid  vigour  of  his 
work  brought  him  an  immediate  increase 
of  popularity,  and  he  was  thenceforth  re- 
cognised at  home  and  abroad  as  one  of 
the  most  commanding  figures  in  the  whole 
array  of  British  art,  as  a  leader  whose 
authority  was  not  to  be  questioned. 

In  1869  he  exhibited  his  portrait  of 
"Nina,  Daughter  of  F.  Lehmann,  Esq.," 
"The  Gambler's  Wife,"  a  "Portrait  of  Sir 


52  MILLAIS 

John  Fowler,"  and  "Vanessa,"  a  companion 
picture  to  his  "Stella;"  and  in  1870  "A 
Widow's  Mite,"  "The  Boyhood  of  Raleigh," 
and  "The  Knight  Errant,"  with  some  other 
works  of  less  importance.  The  portrait  of 
Miss  Lehmann  is  one  of  the  pictures  upon 
which  his  reputation  most  securely  rests, 
admirable  in  its  technical  quality  and  its 
observation  of  character;  and  among  the 
others  "The  Boyhood  of  Raleigh,"  and 
"  The  Knight  Errant,"  are  worthiest  of  at- 
tention because  they  are  treated  with  great 
distinction,  and  have  in  large  measure  that 
interest  which  always  results  from  judici- 
ous interpretation  of  a  well-selected  sub- 
ject. 

"The  Boyhood  of  Raleigh,"  especially, 
is  to  be  considered  on  account  of  its  pos- 
session of  a  certain  dramatic  sentiment 


MILLAIS  53 

which  might  easily  have  been  made  theat- 
rical by  an  artist  less  surely  endowed 
with  a  sense  of  fitness.  But  it  tells  its 
story  with  charm  and  conviction,  and  there 
is  in  the  action  of  the  figures,  and  in  the 
expressions  on  the  faces,  just  the  right 
degree  of  vitality  needed  to  make  clear  the 
pictorial  motive.  "The  Knight  Errant" 
is,  perhaps,  less  significant  as  a  piece  of 
invention,  but  it  has  a  distinct  place  in 
the  artist's  list  of  achievements,  because 
it  affords  one  of  the  few  instances  of  his 
treatment  of  the  nude  figure  on  a  large 
scale.  It  proves  plainly  enough  that  his 
avoidance  of  subjects  of  this  class  was  not 
due  to  any  inability  on  his  part  to  succeed 
as  a  flesh  painter,  for  this  figure  is  beauti- 
ful both  in  colour  and  handling ;  it  is  more 
probable  that  the  classic  formality  and  con- 


54  MILLAIS 

ventionality  which  public  opinion  in  this 
country  requires  in  the  representation  of 
the  nude  did  not  appeal  to  a  man  with  his 
love  of  actuality  and  sincere  regard  for 
nature's  facts.  Indeed,  from  the  standpoint 
of  the  decorative  figure  painter— of  men 
like  Leighton,  or  Albert  Moore,  for  in- 
stance—the woman  that  Millais  has  re- 
presented is  too  frankly  unidealised,  too 
modern  in  type,  and  too  realistically  femi- 
nine. 

But  in  this  disregard  of  convention  there 
is  a  kind  of  summing  up  of  his  beliefs  as 
an  artist.  Though  he  had  changed  the 
outward  aspect  of  his  art  he  was  still 
in  spirit  a  Pre-Raphaelite,  and  a  Pre- 
Raphaelite  he  remained  to  the  end  of 
his  days.  He  depended  more  upon  the 
keenness  of  vision  natural  to  him,  and 


MILLAIS  55 

assiduously  cultivated  by  years  of  close 
observation,  than  upon  what  powers  he 
may  have  had  of  abstract  imagining;  and 
he  sought  to  only  a  limited  extent  to  set 
down  upon  his  canvas  those  mental  images 
which  satisfy  men  who  look  upon  nature 
chiefly  as  a  basis  for  decorative  designs. 
The  mental  image  with  him  was  a  direct 
reflection  of  fact,  not  an  adaptation  modi- 
fied and  formalised  in  accordance  with  re- 
cognised rules,  not  a  fancy  more  or  less 
remotely  referable  to  reality;  but  he  had 
certainly  an  ample  equipment  of  that  taste 
which  enables  the  painter  to  discriminate 
between  the  realities  which  are  too  crude 
and  obvious  to  be  worth  recording,  and 
those  which  by  their  inherent  beauty  claim 
a  permanent  place  in  an  artist's  memory. 
He  had,  too,  the  judgment  to  see  that  the 


56  MILLAIS 

nude,  treated  as  it  would  have  to  be  to 
satisfy  his  aesthetic  conscience,  would  be 
too  plainly  stated  to  be  entirely  accept- 
able. 

He  found  a  much  more  appropriate  field 
for  the  exercise  of  his  particular  capacities 
by  turning  to  landscape  painting.  Many 
of  his  earlier  figure  compositions  had  been 
given  backgrounds  which  showed  how  well 
he  could  manage  the  complex  details  of 
masses  of  tangled  vegetation,  or  the  broad 
and  simple  lines  of  a  piece  of  rural  scenery ; 
but  in  1871  he  attempted  for  the  first  time 
a  landscape  which  was  complete  in  itself 
and  not  merely  incidental  in  a  picture 
mainly  concerned  with  human  interest. 
This  landscape,  "  Chill  October,"  was  at  the 
Academy  with  his  "Yes  or  No?"  "Vic- 
tory, O  Lord,"  "A  Somnambulist,"  and  the 


MILLAIS  57 

"Portrait  of  George  Grote,"  and  it  was 
welcomed  by  a  host  of  admirers  as  a  new 
revelation  of  his  versatility.  It  has  cer- 
tainly qualities  which  justify  the  estima- 
tion in  which  it  was  and  is  still  held;  and 
though  it  lacks  that  imaginative  insight 
into  poetic  subtleties  which  accounts  for 
so  much  in  the  work  of  a  master  like 
Turner,  it  must  always  claim  the  respect 
of  art  lovers  as  a  large,  dignified,  and  sin- 
cere study  of  nature  in  one  of  her  sadder 
moods.  It  is  the  reserve  of  the  picture, 
its  reticent  realism,  that  chiefly  makes  it 
memorable,  for  it  is  neither  imposing  in 
subject  nor  striking  in  effect;  but  in  its 
broad  simplicity  there  is  something  rarely 
fascinating. 

Other  nature  studies  of  the  same  char- 
acter followed  at  brief  intervals  during  the 


58  MILLAIS 

next  few  years ;  they  added  to  the  in- 
terest of  the  artist's  practice,  but  they  can 
scarcely  be  said  to  have  equalled  in  im- 
portance the  portraits  and  figure  subjects 
which  he  completed  at  this  stage  of  his 
career.  Millais  was,  of  course,  far  too  great 
a  master  to  have  failed  in  any  branch  of 
artistic  practice  to  which  he  seriously  de- 
voted himself,  but  the  very  capacities  which 
made  him  so  successful  as  a  painter  of  the 
human  subject  prevented  him  from  look- 
ing at  open-air  nature  with  the  necessary 
degree  of  abstraction.  The  physical  char- 
acter of  a  piece  of  scenery,  its  details  and 
individual  peculiarities,  he  could  record  with 
absolute  certainty,  though  the  elusive  sub- 
tleties of  atmosphere,  and  the  charming  ac- 
cidents of  illumination,  which  mean  so  much 
in  the  poetic  rendering  of  landscape,  he 


PLATE  VII.-OPHELIA 

(Tate  Gallery) 

Realism  more  searching  and  more  significant  than  that  which 
Millais  sought  for  and  attained  in  this  small  canvas  would  hardly 
come  within  the  bounds  of  possibility.  But  the  picture  is  much 
more  than  a  simple  study  of  facts  ;  it  has  an  exquisite  charm  of 
poetic  feeling,  and  it  is  conceived  with  a  full  measure  of  the  tenderness 
needed  in  a  representation  of  the  most  pathetic  of  all  Shakespeare's 
heroines.  Such  a  work  has  a  place,  definite  and  indisputable,  among 
the  classics  of  art,  and  counts  as  one  of  the  chief  masterpieces  of  the 
British  School. 


SIM 


MILLAIS  61 

dwelt  upon  hardly  at  all.  In  many  of  his 
landscapes  the  breadth  and  dignity,  the  ac- 
curate relation  of  part  to  part,  the  fascina- 
ting simplicity  of  manner,  which  are  among 
the  greater  merits  of  "Chill  October,"  can 
be  praised  without  reservation  or  hesita- 
tion; but  the  touch  of  fantasy,  of  actual 
unreality,  by  which  the  inspired  landscape 
painter  seems  to  suggest  more  truly  the 
real  spirit  of  nature,  he  hardly  ever  at- 
tempted ;  and  never,  it  may  fairly  be  said, 
with  complete  success. 

The  years  over  which  his  activity  as  an 
exponent  of  pure  landscape  extended  are, 
however,  memorable  because  they  saw  the 
production  of  some  of  the  most  triumphant 
achievements  of  his  maturer  life.  With  his 
two  landscapes,  "Flowing  to  the  Sea," 
and  "Flowing  to  the  River,"  he  exhibited 


62  MILLAIS 

in  1872  his  "Hearts  are  Trumps,"  a  por- 
trait group  which  has  become  a  modern 
classic ;  and  in  1873  another  wonderful  por- 
trait, the  three-quarter  length  of  "  Mrs. 
Bischoffsheim."  But  it  was  in  1874  that  he 
showed  what  is  in  many  ways  the  greatest 
of  all  his  paintings,  "The  North-West 
Passage,"  a  work  which,  if  he  had  done 
nothing  else  of  moment,  would  suffice  to 
place  him  securely  among  the  master 
painters  of  the  world.  The  head  of  the 
old  man,  who  is  the  central  figure  in  the 
picture,  is  entirely  magnificent,  and  there 
is  much  besides  in  this  canvas  which  would 
have  been  beyond  the  reach  of  any  one  but 
an  artist  of  almost  abnormal  power.  This 
was  followed  in  1875  by  his  portrait  of 
"Miss  Eveleen  Tennant,"  and  in  1877  by 
the  "Yeoman  of  the  Guard,"  which  runs 


MILLAIS  63 

"The  North-West   Passage"   close  in  the 
race  for  supremacy. 

At  this  time,  indeed,  his  productiveness 
was  extraordinary;  subject  pictures,  por- 
traits, and  landscapes  appeared  in  rapid 
succession,  and  in  all  of  them  he  kept  to 
a  level  of  masterly  practice  which  other 
men  reach  only  occasionally  and  at  rare  in- 
tervals. Between  1873  and  1879  he  painted 
eight  landscapes,  all  important  in  scale  and 
interesting  in  treatment,  but  after  1879  he 
produced  no  more  for  nearly  ten  years, 
when  he  began  a  fresh  series.  He  was 
apparently  too  busy  with  portraits  and 
figure  subjects  to  give  much  time  to  out- 
of-door  work,  and  to  satisfy  the  demands 
made  upon  him  by  art  collectors  and 
sitters  he  must  have  had  to  work  his 
hardest.  Yet  popularity  did  not  make  him 


64  MILLAIS 

careless,  and  his  hard  work  diminished 
neither  his  freshness  of  outlook  nor  his 
freedom  of  expression.  Conscientiousness 
as  a  craftsman  was  always  one  of  his 
virtues,  and  the  knowledge  that  he  had 
a  host  of  admirers  ready  to  accept  almost 
anything  he  would  give  them  had  cer- 
tainly not  the  effect  of  inducing  him  to 
lower  his  standard. 

In  the  long  list  of  his  paintings,  which 
belong  to  the  period  beginning  in  1879  ancl 
ending  in  1888,  several  stand  out  with 
special  prominence — for  example,  his  por- 
traits of  "Mrs.  Jopling,"  and  "The  Right 
Hon.  W.  E.  Gladstone,"  "Cherry  Ripe," 
and  "The  Princess  Elizabeth,"  all  in  1879, 
"The  Right  Hon.  John  Bright"  in  1880, 
"Cardinal  Newman,"  "Alfred,  Lord  Tenny- 
son," "Sir  Henry  Thompson,"  "Cinder- 


MILLAIS  65 

ella,"  and  "Caller  Herrin',"  in  1881,  "J.  C. 
Hook,  R.A.,"  and  "The  Captive,"  in  1882, 
"The  Marquess  of  Salisbury"  in  1883, 
"The  Ruling  Passion,"  and  another  por- 
trait of  Gladstone,  in  1885,  "Bubbles"  in 
1886,  and  "The  Marquess  of  Hartington" 
in  1887.  Some  of  these  were  shown  at  the 
Academy,  but  he  was  producing  far  more 
year  by  year  than  could  be  exhibited  there, 
so  he  sent  many  important  works  to  the 
Grosvenor  Gallery,  and  most  of  his  subject 
pictures  to  the  galleries  of  the  dealers  by 
whom  they  were  commissioned. 

After  1888  there  was  some  relaxation 
in  his  effort;  in  that  year  he  had  at  the 
Academy  only  one  picture,  a  landscape, 
"Murthly  Moss,"  and  only  one  portrait  in 
each  of  the  years  1889  and  1890,  though 
he  showed  several  works  in  other  galleries. 


66  MILLAIS 

In  1892  his  landscapes  "  Halcyon  Weather," 
and  "  Blow,  Blow,  thou  Winter  Wind,"  were 
at  the  Academy,  but  after  that  year  he 
worked  no  more  out-of-doors.  Of  the  can- 
vases painted  during  the  last  three  or  four 
years  of  his  life,  the  most  memorable 
are  his  portrait  of  "John  Hare"  (1893), 
"Speak!  Speak!"  (1895),  and  "A  Fore- 
runner" (1896),  all  of  which  were  at  the 
Academy,  and  "Time  the  Reaper"  which 
was  at  the  New  Gallery  in  1895.  "Speak! 
Speak!"  was  purchased  by  the  Chantrey 
Fund  trustees,  and  is  now  in  the  National 
Gallery  of  British  Art  with  the  other  ad- 
mirably chosen  examples  of  his  art  which 
were  given  to  the  nation  by  Sir  Henry 
Tate. 

The  crowning  honour  of  his   life  came 
to    him    in   February    1896,   when    he    was 


MILLAIS  67 

elected  President  of  the  Royal  Academy  in 
succession  to  Lord  Leighton — an  honour 
which  was  particularly  appropriate  not  only 
because  of  his  eminence  as  an  artist,  but 
also  because  he  had  been  intimately  con- 
nected for  nearly  sixty  years  with  the  in- 
stitution over  which  he  was  then  called 
to  preside.  To  this  connection  he  referred 
in  his  speech  at  the  Academy  banquet  in 
1895,  at  which  he  took  the  chair  in  the 
place  of  Leighton  whose  illness  prevented 
him  from  occupying  his  accustomed  posi- 
tion. The  words  which  Millais  used  on 
this  occasion  expressed  generously  and 
affectionately  his  sense  of  obligation  to  the 
Academy  by  which  he  had  been  trained  in 
his  boyhood,  and  from  which  he  had  re- 
ceived encouragement  and  support  at  the 
most  critical  period  of  his  career,  and  de- 


68  MILLAIS 

clared  with  characteristic  frankness  that 
he  owed  to  it  a  debt  of  gratitude  which 
he  never  could  repay. 

To  those,  however,  who  know  how  loyal 
he  was  to  the  institution  that  he  loved  so 
well  it  would  seem  that  the  debt  was, 
indeed,  fully  paid.  Few  men  have  done 
more  to  uphold  the  repute  of  the  Academy, 
few  have  by  the  brilliancy  of  their  powers 
and  their  charm  of  personality  done  it 
more  credit.  That  Leighton  was  the  ideal 
President  can  be  readily  admitted,  but 
Millais,  as  his  successor,  would  have  carried 
on  a  great  tradition  with  dignity  and  sym- 
pathy and  with  no  diminution  of  his  pre- 
decessor's generous  tolerance  and  earnest 
sense  of  artistic  responsibility.  He  would 
have  kept  the  Academy  on  broad  lines, 
and  by  his  impatience  of  empty  formalities 


PLATE  VIII.-THE  NORTH-WEST   PASSAGE 
(Tate  Gallery) 

Even  if  the  "North- West  Passage"  were  not  the  masterly  piece 
of  painting  that  it  is,  it  would  still  be  a  picture  of  importance  because 
it  appeals  so  vividly  to  the  national  spirit  of  adventure.  The  old 
Arctic  explorer,  no  longer  able  to  satisfy  his  still  strenuous  inclinations, 
listens  to  the  record  of  his  past  activities  which  is  being  read  to  him 
by  his  daughter,  and  yearns  once  more  to  battle  with  the  hardships 
which  must  be  faced  by  the  traveller  in  the  frozen  north.  The  old 
man's  head,  one  of  the  finest  technical  achievements  in  modern  art, 
was  painted  from  Trelawny,  the  friend  of  Byron,  and  Shelley. 


MILLAIS  71 

he  would  have  prevented  it  from  losing 
touch  with  the  movements  in  modern 
art. 

But,  unfortunately,  he  was  destined  to 
hold  his  honourable  office  for  but  a  brief 
time.  Even  before  Leighton's  death  he 
had  been  suffering  from  a  throat  trouble 
which  not  long  after  was  pronounced  to  be 
cancer;  and  in  the  months  that  followed 
immediately  on  his  election  the  disease 
made  rapid  progress.  Not  long  after  the 
opening  of  the  1896  Academy  Exhibition 
his  condition  became  so  serious  that  an 
immediately  fatal  result  was  expected ;  but 
by  an  operation  he  obtained  some  tempo- 
rary relief  and  his  life  was  prolonged  for  a 
few  weeks.  This,  however,  was  only  a 
brief  respite;  he  died  on  August  13,  and 
was  buried  a  week  later  in  St.  Paul's 


72  MILLAIS 

Cathedral,  where  little  more  than  six  months 
before  he  had  followed  his  old  friend's 
body  to  the  grave. 

To  speak  of  his  death  as  premature 
would  be  scarcely  a  misapplication  of  the 
word.  Although  Millais  had  completed  his 
sixty-seventh  year  he  was  still  in  art  a 
young  man.  His  vigour  had  not  waned,  and 
there  was  no  perceptible  diminution  of  his 
artistic  vitality  even  in  those  last  works 
which  he  painted  under  the  shadow  of 
nearly  impending  death.  To  a  man  of  his 
splendid  physique  and  buoyant  tempera- 
ment age  would  have  come  slowly,  and  the 
inevitable  degeneration  of  his  powers  would 
have  not  begun  for  many  more  years.  The 
possibility  of  great  achievement  remained 
to  him,  and  it  would  be  true  to  say  that 
his  death  robbed  us  of  much  which  would 


MILLAIS  73 

have  added  greatly  to  the  sum  total  of 
British  art.  Yet  we  may  be  grateful  to  fate 
for  allowing  him  to  develop  the  promise  of 
his  youth  in  the  splendour  of  his  maturer 
years ;  it  is  so  often  the  lot  of  the  preco- 
cious genius  to  die  young  with  his  mission 
but  half  fulfilled.  If  death  had  come  to 
Millais  as  it  did  to  Bonington  or  Fred 
Walker,  our  loss  would  have  been  sad 
indeed. 

In  discussing  Millais  as  an  artist  the 
part  which  his  personality  played  in  mak- 
ing him  what  he  was  must  by  no  means 
be  overlooked.  Something  of  the  vitality 
and  the  virility  of  his  art  was  due  to  the 
way  in  which  he  kept  touch  with  the  life 
about  him,  and  interested  himself  in  people 
and  things.  He  was  no  recluse  who  fed  in 
secret  upon  his  own  ideas,  or  narrowed 


74  MILLAIS 

his  outlook  by  hedging  himself  round  with 
prejudices  and  preferences  for  one  special 
class  of  artistic  material.  Instead,  he  went 
out  into  the  world  and  acquired  his  impres- 
sions of  humanity  in  all  directions  and  at 
first  hand,  finding  much  pleasure  in  associa- 
tion with  his  fellow-men.  To  his  own 
human  nature  he  gave  free  rein;  he  was 
a  keen  sportsman,  a  lover  of  children — of 
whose  ways  he  had,  as  he  proved  in  scores 
of  pictures,  a  perfect  understanding — and 
a  man  who  was  always  happy  in  con- 
genial society,  and  always  welcome.  He 
lived  his  life,  in  fact,  largely,  genially,  and 
wholesomely,  and  he  was  as  much  un- 
spoiled by  the  prosperity  which  came  to 
him  in  his  maturer  years  as  he  was  un- 
shaken by  the  opposition  which  he  had  to 
face  in  that  brief  period  of  his  youth  when, 


MILLAIS  75 

as    he    used    to   say   himself,    he   was    "so 
dreadfully  bullied." 

That  this  brief  taste  of  unpopularity  did 
him  good  rather  than  harm  can  well  be 
imagined,  for  without  making  him  bitter 
it  tested  with  some  severity  his  tenacity 
and  his  power  to  fight  vigorously  for  what 
he  believed  to  be  right— and  such  a  test 
has  always  its  value  as  a  means  of  develop- 
ing the  finer  qualities  of  a  strong  man, 
or  as  a  warning  to  the  weak  one  of  the 
need  for  self-examination.  Millais  did  not 
require  any  incentive  to  self-examination, 
because  he  knew  well  enough  what  he  in- 
tended to  do  when  he  deliberately  set  up 
his  own  conviction  against  that  of  the  men 
who  practically  ruled  British  art,  and  he 
did  not  enter  upon  the  fight  with  any  idea 
of  backing  out  if  he  found  it  was  likely  to 


76  MILLAIS 

go  against  him.  But  after  the  kind  of 
triumphal  progress  which  he  made  through 
the  Academy  schools,  the  discovery  that 
the  wider  public  was  not  disposed  to  accept 
him  as  infallible  was  possibly  necessary  to 
prove  to  him  that  successes  as  a  student 
did  not  give  him,  as  a  matter  of  course,  an 
assured  place  among  the  chiefs  of  his  profes- 
sion. He  was  taught  roughly,  and  in  a 
way  that  roused  both  his  fighting  spirit  and 
his  pride,  that  this  position  was  to  be  won 
only  by  sustained  and  strenuous  effort;  and 
this  lesson  he  never  forgot.  Its  effects 
persisted  long  after  he  had  become  a 
popular  favourite,  and  they  helped,  it  can 
be  fairly  believed,  to  strengthen  his  char- 
acter and  to  keep  him  from  that  easy  con- 
tentment with  his  own  works  which  is  the 
first  step  towards  degeneration.  He  did 


MILLAIS  77 

not  degenerate  after  he  had  secured  what 
he  had  been  striving  for;  although  he  had 
silenced  his  critics,  and  had  won  them  over 
to  his  side,  he  continued  to  sit  in  severest 
judgment  upon  himself,  and  to  the  last  he 
exacted  from  his  own  capacities  the  utmost 
they  could  give  him. 


The  plates  are  printed  by  BEMROSE  &  SONS,  LTD.,  Derby  and  London 
The  text  at  the  BALLANTYNE  PRESS,  Edinburgh 


08 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY