The Orchid review.

ig

“epg dhergee Ade pi BA ee vd oes ew ee

hil ae hig

Ney

er eor et
% 9

ODONTOGLOSSUM PESCATOREI (see page 364.)

LAE

ORCHID REVIEW

An ZJllustrated Blonthly Journal

DEVOTED..T.0 ORCHIDOLOG ¥

EpITED sy R. ALLEN ROLFE, A.L.S.

VOLUME XXI.

1913

KEW:
FRANK LESLIE & CO., 12, LAWN CRESCENT.

ONDON AGENT
MARSHALL branes LTD., 43. Srahesrin ROW, EE.

[All rights reserved).

TO
Str FREDERICK W. MOORE, MiA.; AcL.S.,
KEEPER OF THE
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN, GLASNEVIN,
ONE OF OUR MOST ENTHUSIASTIC
AND
MOST SUCCESSFUL CULTIVATORS,
THIS TWENTY-FIRST VOLUME OF THE
“ORCHID REVIEW”

IS CORDIALLY DEDICATED.

Kew,
December, 1913.

Co?
Pe

tate ORCHID: REVIEW.

SAL ITN EIA AS REA

Vor. XXI.| JANUARY, 1913. [No. 241.

THE ORCHID REVIEW.
WIrH the last issue the Orchid Review completed its twentieth volume,
and we have to thank numerous friends and readers for kindly congratulations
and appreciation of the work, with good wishes for the future. Twenty
years is a long period in the history of Orchidology, but the events that
have marked its progress have been recorded as fully and faithfully as space
and circumstances permitted, and the existence of a wide circle of readers,
both at home and abroad, including a good number from the commencement,
affords evidence that the work has been appreciated. In this connection it
may be interesting to repeat the original announcement :—
““OQuR PROGRAMME,

‘* The Orchid Review has been established to supply a want which we
believe has long been felt among amateurs of Orchids, namely a journal
devoted to their special interests.

** The cultivation of Orchids has become a most important, and to some
extent also, a special branch of modern horticulture. The number of people
and the amount of capital employed directly or indirectly in it is very large,
Already the subject has a literature of its own, though too scattered to be
readily accessible, and anything tending to concentrate it would confer a
real boon upon those interested in the subject.

“In this belief we have decided to establish a monthly repertorium of
information on every important branch of Orchidology, and to present it to
the reader in a form suitable both for present use and future reference. We
believe there is room for such a publication, without unduly interfering with
the scope of the existing horticultural press, and we look with confidence
for such support as shall enable us to prosecute our labours with success.

‘The following are among the subjects to which our attention will be
specially devoted :—

‘‘ Descriptions of new species of Orchids, with which our collections are
constantly being enriched, will be an important feature of the Review, and
some of the more striking of these will be figured, as circumstances permit.

‘‘ Hybrid Orchids will receive due attention. The importance of recording
the origin and parentage of the members of this ever-increasing group will

1

2 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ JANUARY, 1913,

be universally recognised, both for its own sake, and because of the light it
throws on the occurrence of hybrids in a wild state.

‘* Notices of interesting collections will constantly be found in our columns,
and will doubtless prove of interest to a wide circle of readers. The rich
Burford collection has been selected for the commencement of the series.

** Special attention will be devoted to the cultural department, for which
seasonable articles will be contributed by experienced cultivators. <A
comprehensive calendar of operations will be contributed by Mr. W. H.
White, of Burford, Dorking, which should prove serviceable to all who are
in any way engaged in the cultivation of Orchids.

‘* A series of historical articles is commenced in the present number by the
first instalment of a very interesting History of Orchid Hybridisation.

**It is intended to make the illustrations a special feature of the work. In
order to ensure accuracy and highly-finished results, they will be executed
and reproduced by a photographic process. Care will also be exercised in
their selection. :

“‘ Notes of rarities, geographical notes and sketches of Orchids at home,
biographical sketches, literature, and any other matters likely to prove
useful or interesting to Orchidists, will find a place in our pages.

“ Reports of meetings and exhibitions, with doings of the month generally,
will also be adequately provided for.

“Tn short, it is intended to make the work a general repertorium of Orchid
lore, and, by conducting it on broad and independent lines, to enlist the
sympathy and secure the support of all lovers of this unrivalled family.”

How far we have succeeded in carrying this programme into effect
during a period of twenty years can best be left to others to judge,
and we therefore include a few of the numerous congratulatory messages
which have reached us :—

“THE ORCHID REVIEW.—With its present December issue this useful
Orchid journal celebrates the completion of its twentieth volume, and we
take the opportunity to congratulate the editor on the success of his venture,
launched in 1893 as an illustrated monthly journal ‘devoted to Orchidology
in all its branches.’ The original programme has been followed faithfully.
Few things relating to Orchidology have escaped attention; each subject has
been exhaustively dealt with, and the matter placed before the reader in
plain and straightforward language. The history of Orchids and _ their
cultivation from the earliest times, the evolution of Orchids, their structural
peculiarities, interesting facts concerning their discovery, the climatic
conditions of their native habitats, and other subjects likely to be interesting
and useful to the Orchidist, have received attention. Current topics have
always been well represented, and the reports of Orchid exhibitions and
meetings well reported. We trust that the Orchid Review, which attains its

JANUARY, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 3

majority in the coming year, will continue to flourish for many years to
come.”’—Gardeners’ Chronicle.

‘With the December issue of the Orchid Review the twentieth volume is
completed, and to commemorate the event the January issue will be an
enlarged and special number. It has been decided to act upon the proposal
made in the November number to prepare a general index. This is as it
should be, for such a publication as this, which aims at covering ‘every
phase of Orchidology, in all probability is deemed worthy of a cover as each
successive volume is completed.”—Journal of Horticulture.

THE OrcHID Review.—This monthly journal of Orchidology is now
entering its twenty-first year. The first issue appeared in January, 1893,
when it was established to supply a long-felt want among amateurs of
Orchids, viz., a journal devoted to their special interests. Every branch of
Orchidology, including cultivation, evolution, structural peculiarities,
natural distribution, and the vexed question of hybrid nomenclature, has
been discussed and continues to be discussed in the pages of the Orchid
Review. The importance of this extremely useful work is fully recognised
and appreciated by Orchid experts, and while wishing it every success in
the future, we take this opportunity of congratulating Mr. R. A. Rolfe,
A.L.S., the Editor, on the success he has achieved.—The Garden.

‘‘ Many congratulations upon the completion of the twentieth volume of
the Orchid Review. My wife and I find the work an invaluable record, to
which we constantly refer, and the proposed index for the whole of the
volumes will be very acceptable as a time saver. I join with a large
number of others in wishing many years of useful life to the Orchid Review
and its esteemed Editor.”—R. G. Tuwalres, Chessington, Streatham Hill.

‘‘The Orchid Review has reached the twentieth year of its existence, an
age when one naturally expects better things, and I can only hope that the
promise of youth and the care which you and others have bestowed upon it
may be well repaid by a successful career in the future. There are days in
which one has little time to call one’s own, but I always manage to find
time to peruse the pages of the Orchid Review.”’—-SIR JEREMIAH COLMAN,
Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate.

In thanking our friends for such kindly appreciation we would invite
their increased assistance and co-operation in the future. Our pages are
open to bona-fide communications from anyone, and valuable information is

apt to be lost unless recorded at the time. Short notes or articles,

THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 19f3-

4
interesting flowers, records of hybrids, and photographs for reproduction
will be cordially welcomed. Our aim is to make the work of the widest

be wanting to

mary

possible utility and interest, and no effort on our part shal
secure this end.
Lastly, we accede to a request made by some of our readers, who are

good enough to think the occasion appropriate, to include a portrait* of

Very faithfully yours,
THE EDITor.

oF the ole Thich was tak , i ]
f the block, which was taken a year ago, we are indebted to the
‘Guild. The book shown is also appropriate, being the first volume

January, 1912.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 5

EVENTS OF 1g1z2.

THE great event of the past year was, undoubtedly, the Royal International
Horticultural Exhibition, held at Chelsea about the end of May, which
brought together such a display of Orchids as has never been seen before, a
specially heated tent, 250 feet long by 70 feet broad, being provided for its
accommodation. Orchids, of course, were only one feature of the
Exhibition, but with them alone we are concerned, and they were by
common consent the principal feature of the show, and the magnificent
group staged by Sir George L. Holford, which gained the Cup presented by
His Majesty the King, had never before been equalled anywhere. Curiously
enough a_ period of forty-six years had elapsed since the previous
International Exhibition was held in London, in 1866, and considering
that at this period the first hybrid Cypripedium had not yet reached the
flowering stage, no comparison between the two shows is possible. Hybrids
were the great feature of the recent show, and no fewer than twenty-two
out of the twenty-seven Orchids certificated were of hybrid origin. The
Exhibition was a great undertaking, well carried out, and was favoured
with magnificent weather, the result being a great success, both from a
spectacular standpoint and financially—the latter being shown by a report
in the present issue.

Another noteworthy event of the year was the Exhibition of Autumn-
flowering Orchids held by the R.H.S. on November 5th and 6th last,
together with an Orchid Conference on the second day, which was attended
by such success that we are promised a repetition next year, and the event
may become an annual fixture. The Holland House Show, with the
fortnightly meetings of the R.H.S. and of the Manchester Orchid Society
have also been conspicuously successful.

Hysrips.

There has been an almost constant succession of hybrids throughout the
year, some of them of great promise, almost every meeting bringing new
candidates for public favour. Two noteworthy additions are seen in
Vuylstekeara Hyeana and Lowiara insignis, two trigeneric hybrids for
which the new R.H.S. Rule has been invoked. Odontonia Firminii is an
interesting hybrid between Odontoglossum crispum and Miltonia vexillaria,
raised by M. Firmin Lambeau, while five other Odontonias have made an
appearance during the year. Hybrids of Cochlioda Neetzliana have been
well to the fore, and include Oncidioda Cooksoniz, O. cinnabarina, and
quite a number of Odontiodas. The popular genera Odontoglossum,
Cattleya, and Lzliocattleya have received numerous promising accessions,
while the brilliant little series of hybrids from Sophronitis grandiflora
steadily increases in number.

6 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ JANUARY, 19 3-

NOVELTIES
among imported Orchids have not been numerous, though a few have
appeared, among which we recall the brilliant little Cirrhopetalum
miniatum and Dendrobium Schuetzei, the latter a very fine Philippine
acquisition introduced by Messrs. Sander, which has gained a First-class
Certificate from the R.H.S., and was figured at page 337 of our last volume.
CERTIFICATED ORCHIDS.

There has been an increase in the number of Orchids certificated by
the R.H.S. during the year, the majority again being hybrids. They
include fifty-four First-class Certificates, 103 Awards of Merit, eighteen
Cultural Commendations, and four Lindley Medals. An analysis of the
list of those to which First-class Certificates were granted shows eleven
Leliocattleyas, Odontoglossum and Cattleya ten each, five Odontiodas,
Miltonia and Cypripedium four each, Cymbidium three, Brassocattleya and
Dendrobium two, while Lelia, Vanda, and Sophrocatlelia each contribute
a single example to the list. The Awards of Merit we have not attempted
to analyse, but particulars of all of them are given in our reports.

OTHER INTERESTING EVENTS
that may be mentioned are the flowering of the first artificially-raised hybrid
of the genus Ophrys, by M. Fernand Denis, and the definite identification
of a parasitic fungus, Cercospora Odontoglossi, which has caused some
trouble among British collections of Odontoglossums. Many interesting
questions have been discussed in our pages, particularly relating to hybrids
and hybridity, and a large number of striking acquisitions have been
described or figured.

LossEs DURING THE YEAR
include Mr. F. M. Burton, an Orchidist of thirty years standing, the raiser
of Epidendrum Burtonii and several hybrid Cypripediums, Mr. |
Bergheim, a keen naturalist and lover of Orchids, who had made several
trips abroad in pursuit of his favourite hobby, and M. P. M. Binot, who had
been for many years an importer of Brazilian Orchids.

THE COMING YEAR

will witness another great Quinquennial Exhibition at Ghent, at which a
very fine show of Orchids is anticipated, and we believe the Spring Show of
the R.H.S. will be held about the end of May at Chelsea, instead of at the
Temple Gardens, as formerly. These, with the Summer Show at Holland
House, that of autumn-blooming Orchids at Westminster, and the usual
fortnightly meetings in London and Manchester promise to be as successful
as ever, for hybrids are still an increasing factor in these displays, and
some interesting developments may be anticipated with confidence. We
wish all our readers a Happy New Year, and increased success with, and
enjoyment from their collections.

January, 1912.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 7

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

A FLOWER of a hybrid Cypripedium, called Mrs. Harry Bruce, now flowering
for the first time, has been sent from the collection of O. O. Wrigley, Esq.,
Bridge Hall, Bury, by Mr. Rogers, who also encloses flowers of the two
parents, C. Sallieri virens, a form raised in the collection, and C.
Thompsonianum. The seedling is larger than either parent, and much
‘recalls C. villosum in its broad petals, lip, and staminode, while the dorsal
sepal is very broad, green, with a narrow white margin, a dark median
band, and some lines of small spots on either side. It is a good bold
flower, though without the bright colour of C. Thompsonianum or the large
well-defined spots of the Sallieri parent. The two parents have rather
neutralised each other, but other seedlings may differ considerably from
the present one.

A plant of Cypripedium Faire-Maud bearing a scape of two curiously
abnormal flowers has been sent from the collection of G. F. Moore, Esq.,
Bourton-on-the-Water, by Mr. Page. The lip of the lower flower is absent,
and the lower sepal is almost as broad as the dorsal one, one side being
veined with rose, as in that, the other with green. The petals are quite
horizontal, and the rest of the flower normal. The upper flower has one
petal erect, and the other sepal-like and underneath, while the sepals are
much alike and lateral. There are two miniature lips, apparently divisions
of one original one, two stamens, and three stigmas. The plant is now
at Kew, and it will be interesting to see what the flowers are like
next year, for some of these abnormal flowers repeat themselves. Curiously
enough, it wasa plant of the same hybrid which produced the crocus-like

flower noted at page 326 of our last volume.

CYPRIPEDIUM ASHBURTONI WITH THREE SEPALS.

I ENCLOSE a photograph of a flower of Cypripedium x Ashburtonie in
which the lower sepal has divided itself into two, each sepal being perfect,
and other parts of the flower normal. This seems to be a reversion to the
original form of construction of Cypripedium, as pointed out in your
interesting articles on the Evolution of the Orchidacee. The plant has
this summer produced five of these malformed flowers, besides one normal,
and one in which the lower sepal was only partly divided. The plant is.
in bloom now for the third time this season, with one flower open, as shown
in the picture, and one bud, which also shows the same characteristics.
It really seems as though the peculiarity has become fixed. I will try to
get some seed from these flowers to see whether their offspring will have
the same tendency.—M. J. Pope, gardener to Mrs. B. B. Tuttle, Naugatuck,
Conn:, US.A,

8 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (January, 1913.

VARIATION OF ODONTOGLOSSUM PERCULTUM.

TurouGH the kindness of Mr. H. J. Chapman, gardener to Mrs. Norman
Cookson, Oakwood, Wylam, we are able to illustrate a remarkable group of
eleven very diverse forms of Odontoglossum purcultum (figs. 1-6, 9-13),*
raised from the same seed pod, together with two of the original grand-
parents, O. crispum Franz Masereel (fig. 7), and O. Pescatorei (fig. 8).
The seed parent was O. Rolfeze Oakwood var. (Pescatorei x Harryanum),

Fig. 1—6, g—13. ODONTOGLOSSUM PERCULTUM.
Fig. 7. O. cRISPUM FRANZ MASEREEL. Fig. 8. O. PESCATOREI.

a large and handsome form, heavily blotched with ¢ark purple, which
received an Award of Merit from the R.H.S. in April, 1902 (O.R., x. p. 148).

The pollen parent was.O. armainvillierense Cooksoniz (Pescatorei x

* For convenience of reference we have numbered the flowers, beginning with the one
on the left, and then taking the vertical rows successively from top to bottom; the
numbers, however, have not been added to the block.

january, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 9

crispum Franz Masereel) (the actual forms shown in figs. 7 and 8), a
charming variety, copiously blotched with violet-purple on a white ground,
which received a First-class Certificate from the R.H.S. in March, 1904
(O.R., xii. pp. 117, 120). The varieties used as parents of O. percultum
were not available when the photograph was-taken, but we give a
figure of O. armainvillierense for comparison. The other grand-

RENSE,

ODONTOGLOSSUM ARMAINVILLIE

T4.

Fig,

parent, O. Harryanum, is not included among the figures, but its
characters are well known. Before comparing this polymorphic assemblage
with the parent species it must be remarked that O. crispum Franz
Masereel is not a pure crispum, but a natural hybrid in which O.
luteopurpureum is more or less directly concerned—it may be a form of
©. mirum or a reversion from O. Wilckeanum, but all one can say is that

Io THE ORCHID “REVIEW. [JANUARY, I913-

the characters of O. crispum and QO. luteopurpureum can be traced in it.
Thus four species are concerned in the ancestry of O. percultum, O.
Pescatorei—which comes in through both the parents—O. Harryanum, O.
crispum, and QO. luteopurpureum. The characters of the hybrids are fairly
in accordance, for the influence of O. Pescatorei is very marked in figs. z, 4,
and 12, and less distinctly so in 5, 11, and 13, while that of O. Harryanum
is obvious enough in 3,6, and 10. There is a marked resemblance to O.
Rolfez in figs. 11 and 13, and less so in 2 and 5, while O. armainvillierense
can be traced in £ and 4, especially the latter. The only flower in which
the character of O. c. Franz Masereel is very marked is fig. 9. The
characters of O. crispum and O. luteopurpureum, especially the latter, are
less clearly traced, but the figures are too small for all of them to be very
distinct. | Most of the forms shown are very handsome, and when fully
developed may be distinguished by varietal names. Such a batch affords a
very graphic insight into what must take place in nature where crossing
by insects is common, as in the O. crispum district, for example,
and also the impossibility of tracing the ancestry of such complex hybrid
forms by their characters alone. It once more emphasises the importance
of keeping exact records. In conclusion we would ask some of our
hybridists to self-fertilise O. crispum Franz Masereel. Some good forms
would almost certainly result, while the forms which reverted would afford
a valuable clue to its ancestry. We do not remember that such an
experiment has been made.
5 agemee

A DEFINITION OF MENDELISM.—‘ As I understand Mendelism it is a
concept pure and simple. One crosses various animals or plants and
records the results. . . . We push things into the germ cells as we place
the dollars in the magician’s hat. Hocuspocus! They disappear! Presto !
Out they come again! If we have marked our money we may find that
that which appears from the magician’s false-bottomed hat is not the same as
that which we putin. But it looks the same, and is good coin of the realm.
We have a good right, therefore, to poke our characters into the germ cell
and to pull them out again if by so-doing we can develop—not a true
conception of the mechanism of heredity—but a scheme that aids in
describing an inheritance. Wemaydothis even ... ifwe remember. . .
that we have not pulled something new and astonishing out of the germ
cell, that a unit-factor represents an idea and not a reality, though it must
have a broad base of reality if it is to describe a series of genetic facts.”—
Frof. E. M. Easr.

[We have always contended that unit-characters were imaginary things,
having no actual existence, and the confirmation from such a source is

valuable.—Ep.] .

January, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. iP

ROYAL INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL EXHIBITION.
THE Directors of the Royal International Horticultural Exhibition, 1gr2,.
met at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Westminster, on the 26th November,
to consider a resolution for disposing of the property of the Company, after
payment of all debts and liabilities.

The Balance-sheet showed a net profit of £2,870 3s. 7d. Allowing for
payments which have still to be made, the balance may be taken as
approximately £2,500. It was decided to disburse the profits in the
following manner :—

To the Irish Gardeners’ Association and
Benevolent Society... Hie PIO CO. 9
Towards the reprinting and ara up to date
of Dr. A. G. Pritzel’s Botanical Index ibe “he50. O..0
(To this latter purpose the R.H.S. have already promised to give £1,000).

The remainder of the profits—about £2,150-—will be divided between
the Gardeners’ Royal Benevolent Institution and the Royal Gardeners’
Orphan Fund, in the proportion of two-thirds to the former Institution and
one-third to the latter.

A second resolution was passed, namely, that the Company be
voluntarily wound up, and that Mr. G. J. Ingram be appointed liquidator.
These resolutions will be confirmed at a later meeting.

R. Hooper PEARSON,

Hon. Press Secretary.

GONGORA LEUCOCHILA.

Tuts white-lipped Gongora is an extremely interesting species. A plant
was sent to the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, U.S.A., from
Guatemala, in 1909. Previous to its flowering it was taken for G. bufonia,
which it strongly resembles in growth, but when the plant bloomed a
few weeks ago it was identified with the plant described and figured as:
Gongora leucochila, Lem. (Fiore des Serres, vol. i. t. 37). The pseudobulbs
are ovate and strongly corrugated, and the leaves are elliptic-lanceolate,
with five prominent ribs. The lateral sepals are half yellowish-white, the
other half being lilac-purple with dark brown spots; the dorsal sepal and
petals are wholly lilac-purple with dark brown coloured spots. The rachis
and pedicels are also of a dark purplish lilac. The labellum is pure white,
as the specific name indicates ; it bears four horn-like appendages, the two
basal ones short and flat, the others very long and acuminate. The
labellum is curious in shape, and has been compared to “‘ the mutilated
body of a chicken just prepared for the spit.” If the labellum be laid out

a2 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ JANUARY, I9g13.

flat this description can be appreciated, the horns resembling the legs of a
chicken admirably. G.’°H.’PRING.
Missouri Botanic Garden.

(Mr. Pring, encloses a photograph, which fully confirms the determination.
He has previously sent us an interesting article on Orchids at the Missouri
Botanic Garden (O.R., xviii. pp. 141-143), which we are glad to know
brought him several communications, including one from Panama. He now
adds: ‘‘It may be interesting to know that I am growing all my Chysis,
‘Catasetums, and Cycnoches outside during the summer, and the Chysis,
especially, are making very fine pseudobulbs.” Of course the summer
temperature is much warmer than in England.—Ep.|

VANDA CCERULEA PEETERSIANA.

THE appearance of the beautiful pink-flowered Vanda ccerulea Sander at
the R.H.S. meeting held on December 3rd last serves to recall the variety
Peetersiana, probably the earliest pink-flowered form known. It appeared
in the Establishment of M. A. A. Peeters, Brussels, and was exhibited at a
meeting of the Société Nationale d’Horticulture de France in November,
1897, and shortly afterwards described (Cogn. in Gard. Chron., 1897, ii.
page 294). The author remarked: ‘‘ This fine variety, remarkable for the
complete absence of blue in the flowers, was shown in an importation from
the Khasia Mountains by M. A. A. Peeters. It borea spike of nine flowers.
A coloured plate was also published (Cogn. Dict. Ic. Orch., Vanda, t. 5a),
showing the flowers about two inches across, beautifully suffused with rose-
pink near the margin and paler towards the base, and the front half of
the lip much brighter in colour. We should like to see the locality
confirmed, for there is at least a suspicion that the pink colour in both
plants may be due to re-crossing with V. Charlesworthii, and this would
indicate the Shan States as the habitat. Possibly there are records which
may clear the matter up.—R.A.R.

VANDA C@RULEA ALBIDULA.—An inflorescence of a curious white form of
Vanda coerulea, with some lilac veining on the lip—presumably the one
noted at page 31 of our last volume—is sent from the collection of O. O.
Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury, by Mr. Rogers. A photograph of a very
similar form is also sent from the collection of O. Gunn, Esq., Newport,
Mon. The habit of the plant is that of V. coerulea, but the flowers are
considerably smaller. It has been suggested as a possible hybrid, but, if so,
we cannot at present suggest its parentage. Two or three other anomalous
‘Vandas have appeared among importations of Vanda coerulea from the Shan
States locality, and it would be interesting to have further evidence of the
‘species which grow there intermixed.—R. A. R.

_JANuarY, 1973.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 13:

THE ORCHID CONFERENCE.
(Concluded from vol. xx., page 355.)

The second paper was by Major C. C. Hurst, F.L.S., on the Applica-
tion of Genetics to Orchid Breeding. The lecturer referred to the results.
achieved by Orchid breeders during the past twenty years as one of the
seven wonders of the world of horticulture. A reference to the Orchid Stud-
Book showed that at least 40 genera and 300 distinct species had been:
already utilised. These had given about 2000 primary hybrids, of which:
about 300 are generic hybrids, and some thousands of secondary, tertiary,
and multiple hybrids, to say nothing of multitudinous varietal and!
individual forms which no man can number. In face of such an imposing
array it might seem presumptuous on the part of a student of genetics to-
offer any suggestions as to the advantages that might be derived from an
application of the science of genetics to Orchid breeding, but those behind
the scenes knew that in order to secure a really first-class hybrid it was
necessary to raise large numbers of others, and the number of misfits and.
unwanted weeds that turn up time after time was rather disconcerting.

A study of recent work in genetics pointed to the important fact that law
and order may be perceived in breeding, and the problem of the breeder
was how to manage his matings so as to reduce the number of worthless.
forms toa minimum. Under present conditions, however, Orchid breeders-
must very largely discover these certainties for themselves by experiment,.
and the field was so wide, the conditions so difficult, and the complications
so numerous, that only a practical expert could carry them out. He then
described the first principles of genetics, which the breeder should make
himself acquainted with, and went into considerable details respecting the
inheritance of individual characters, and especially the inheritance of colour
and albinism. He also went into details as to the identification of individual
stud plants whose breeding constitution had been tested, and the importance
of keeping full records of all experiments, for the handsomest hybrids were
not all equally good parents, and it was a sound principle to work with
individual plants that hada good breeding record. He then madea number
of suggestions as to the breeding of albinos, and the importance of
distinguishing between true and false albinos, and gave a number of
Statistical and other details.

Mr. Crawshay congratulated the lecturer on his paper, and on the
pertinacity with which he insisted on the application of genetics to Orchid
breeding. The high mortality among seedling Orchids was a factor that
introduced disturbance in the numerical estimation of results. a

Mr. J. O’Brien said the paper raised subjects of great interest to Orchid
raisers, and alluded to the extreme variability of and tendency to degenerate

a4 THE. ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

in complex hybrids, the latter being sometimes very marked, and plants
raised between two cross-breds of fine quality were sometimes very bad, or
with only an occasional fine novelty among them.

The afternoon session commenced with an excellent paper on Some
Epiphytal Orchids, by Mr. H. G. Alexander, Orchid grower to Lt.-Col. Sir
‘G. L. Holford, Westonbirt. One of the points emphasised by the lecturer
was the uselessness of growing Orchids according to a fixed schedule. The
position and aspect of the house, and the proximity of trees or buildings,
must be taken into consideration. Light was a most essential factor, and
should be afforded on all possible occasions. Orchids, when heavily shaded,
often formed weak growths, but the more light and sun, within reason, gave
an improved constitution, with stronger inflorescences, and more lasting
flowers. Lighter houses were needed, and fixed shading should be avoided.
Full and free ventilation should be given whenever possible. Epiphytes in
their native homes were exposed to a constant current of air, and we should
copy nature by allowing plenty of ventilation, avoiding, however, cold
‘draughts and sudden falls of temperature. Orchids were generally grown
in too high a temperature. Epiphytes are largely dependent upon good
roots being formed, and a suitable condition of the atmosphere as regards
moisture was of far greater importance than any special rooting compost.
‘Succulent materials, such as leaf-mould, should be avoided, and over-
watering carefully guarded against, as it led to the decay of the roots.
Rain-water should be used wherever possible. Excessive drying during the
resting period was to be deprecated. The use of manures was strongly
objected to, and experiments he had made always pointed to disastrous
results. In conclusion Mr. Alexander said that heat, air, light, and
moisture, with close observation and light houses, held the secret of success.

In answer to inquiries, Mr. Alexander stated that at Westonbirt a house
was specially devoted to Vanda ccerulea, that some of the plants exhibited
in the Hall had been grown for thirteen years but the majority for five to
ten years, and that they were grown in an intermediate temperature, with
a minimum of 50° Fahr., and the moisture always kept in accordance with
the heat, a most important matter. It was remarkable that the finest
plants always grew near to the ventilators. Sir Harry J. Veitch remarked
that one of the best collectors once told him that the finest Vanda coerulea
grew in Nature on trees that were isolated, and it was a common sight to
see peasants or regiments of soldiers on the march wearing a spray of the
Vanda. The paper led to a very interesting discussion, in which Messrs.
J- O’Brien, J. Fraser, W. H. Hatcher, W. Cobb, Gurney Wilson, A. A.
McBean, and de Barri Crawshay took part. The Chairman, in proposing
a vote of thanks to the lecturer, said that people with small collections

January, 1y13.-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 15

should go in for allied kinds. It was useless to grow so many kinds under
the same treatment. His advice was to take up smaller subjects and do
them well.

The last paper was Albinism in Orchids, by Mr. R. G. Thwaites. The
lecturer said he was dealing with a controversial subject, and he made his
remarks in no dogmatic spirit, but he had obtained many coloured forms
from white parents when he expected to obtain albinos, and he found it
most difficult to follow the theories of various writers. Some whites seem
to possess a colour factor not discernible to the eye, and he found it
difficult if not impossible to differentiate between the pure white and the
apparent white except by experience of the progeny. He thought that, as
in the case of the spectrum, white Orchids were, in some wonderful way,
built up by colour, for he had produced white by crossing purple with
yellow flowers. Dendrobium nobile virginale if selfed invariably produced
white flowers, and the same could be said of Cattleya labiata alba. Most
albino Orchids were varieties of coloured forms, and only when a white
variety was constant for years was it a true albino. When these were
crossed he believed they never gave coloured forms. In conclusion he
appealed for the discontinuance of the practice of using the term alba for
varieties unless one could be assured of the correctness of the term.

Mr. Rolfe, in opening the discussion, said it would be interesting and
valuable if something reliable could be ascertained about the subject.
Albinism was a quality—a very beautiful quality—and no doubt it arose
from the absence of colour, but there was the difficulty that some albinos
reproduced themselves true when selfed and yet reverted to coloured forms
when crossed. Both Cattleya Warneri alba and C. Gaskelliana alba were
true albinos, as far as could be ascertained by examining the flowers, but
when crossed together some of the resulting seedlings were pure white and
others light rose, showing that a latent colour factor had been revived. Inthe
case of C. intermedia alba x Mossiz Wageneri, however, the whole batch
(C. Dusseldorfii Undine) was white. Cypripedium insigne Sanderz, when
crossed with C. callosum Sandere or C. Lawrenceanum Hyeanum, gave
tise to coloured hybrids, yet all three came true when selfed. C. insigne
Sanderz, however, though one of the best yellows, was not a true albino,
for it showed minute brown spots on the dorsal sepal, and the effect of
crossing was to stimulate their development in the hybrids, the effect being
much the same as if ordinary coloured forms of C. insigne were used. The
effect of crossing was to revive a latent factor, and of course when plants
were selfed no new and disturbing element was introduced. But even
when plants were selfed the offspring were not always uniform. Messrs.
Veitch had raised a batch of C. insigne Sandere by self-pollination, and,

16 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913+

though all came yellow, they were not uniform in character. Flowers of
five seedlings had been picked out and sent to him, no two of which were.
alike, and in one the spots were distinctly more marked than in the original,.
while another was pure yellow, as pure as C. insigne Gladys, and he could
not detect a speck of brown or a coloured hair anywhere. Reversion as the
result of crossing was not remarkable, for lost or latent characters might
easily be revived. A plant might be regarded as made up of a host of
characters, which had been successively acquired, and some of these were
evidently very ancient. while others were geologically recent. In the course
of evolution new characters were constantly arising. In conclusion he
appealed to all those who were making experiments to send the results. to
the press, as by so doing a mass of evidence would be accumulated that
would be of the greatest value to Orchidists.

Major Hurst remarked that the white of Orchids was not white in the
sense of a combination of the colour of the spectrum, but rather. the
absence of colour, and attempted to explain that colour in Cattleya and
Cypripedium was due to the simultaneous presence of two-colour factors,
and the absence of either of them, as well as of both, would result in albinism.
Messrs. J. Fraser, W. H. Hatcher, J. M. Black, W. Bateson, and de Barri
Crawshay also spoke.

The Chairman, on behalf of the Conference, tendered a cordial vote of
thanks to the lecturers and all who had helped to make the meeting a
success, and Sir George L. Holford, in proposing a vote of thanks to the
Chairman, said that all the skill in the world would not grow Orchids to
perfection without proper glass accommodation, and failures were oftem
due to bad housing and bad positions rather than to the want of care on
behalf of the grower.

PHALZNOPSIS INTERMEDIA PorteI.—The Hon. Walter Rothschild
states that, after five years resting, the large plant of Phalenopsis
intermedia Portei, which has been at Tring Park for over thirty years, has
again flowered. It produced this year three large-branched spikes, with a
total of 185 flowers and fully-developed buds. The largest spike has 13
branches with 84 flowers and buds, the next largest 7 branches with 61
flowers and buds, and the smallest 5 branches with 40 flowers and buds.
The plant was among an importation of Phalaenopsis Aphrodite sent home
by Boxali to Messrs. Hugh Low & Co., some 32 years ago (Gard. Chron.,
1912, ll. p. 453). One of the spikes was exhibited at the R.H.S. meeting
held on December 17th !ast, and was awarded a Lindley Medal. _ P. inter-
media originally appeared in an importation of P. Aphrodite (P. amabilis,
Lindl.) with Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, and was described by Lindley as.
a natural hybrid between the latter and P. rosea.

rae ee

Mee Peet oer

January, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. ty

CYCNOCHES FENTADACTYLON.

AN interesting Cycnoches appeared some time ago among the Peruvian

importations of Messrs. Sander & Sons, and a plant obtained from them

Fig. 15. CYCNOCHES PENTADACTYLON.

has now flowered with the Rev. J. C. B. Fletcher, Mundham Vicarage,
Chichester, who has sent a flower for determination. A plant of the same
orgin was exhibited by Messrs. Sander at a meeting of the R.H.S. held on

18 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

March 25th, 1902, under the name of Cycnoches Amesianum (Gard. Chron.,
1902, i. p. 218), but owing to the close resemblance to C. pentadactylon,
especially in the shape of the very characteristic lip, we thought it a form
of that species, and so recorded it (O.R., x. p. 117). The most obvious
difference noticed was the rather smaller, more rounded spots, and the con-
sequently greater amount of the yellow ground colour. This is less obvious
in the flower now sent, and we think that both are forms of the same species.
C. pentadactylon was described and figured by Lindley in 1843 (Bot. Reg.,
xxix., Misc., p. 18, t. 22), from a plant which flowered with Messrs. James
Veitch & Sons, then of Exeter. It is a very striking species, but is seldom
seen in such perfection as in the accompanying figure, which flowered with
W. W. Mann, Esq., Ravenswood, Bexley, and received a First-class
Certificate from the R.H.S. in January, 1893. It bore ten racemes—five of
them on one pseudobulb—with an aggregate of 247 flowers, of which thirty-
seven were borne ona single raceme. It isa remarkable specimen in every
respect. The flowers shown are all males. The female flowers have been
known since 1889, both sexes appearing together in the collection of E.
Gotto, Esq., The Logs, Hampstead Heath. It is a native of the Upper
Amazons, being found at Manaos, on the Rio Negro, and on its tributary the
River Purus. The late Mr. E. S. Rand has stated that it is the giant of the
River Purus, and without exception the most beautiful and fragrant
Amazonian Orchid known to him, filling the air with a delicious Vanilla-like
fragrance. He has seen the pseudobulbs three feet long and two inches in
diameter, and bearing flowers of both sexes, the males in racemes from the
top of the pseudobulbs, sometimes two feet long, with from fifty to seventy
flowers, and the females beneath, with from one to three flowers. Occasion-
ally both are found on the same inflorescence, of which an example is
preserved at Kew. R.AR:
—_->0<-

ONCIDIUM HYBRIDUM.—Another plant of Oncidium hybridum (tigrinum X
lamelligerum) was exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. at the R.H.S.
meeting held on November rgth last, this time in much improved form.
It bore a branched inflorescence of twenty-two flowers and buds, the twining
habit in this case being absent. A flower kindly given to us is 2} inches
across, and has brown sepals with a narrow yellow margin, yellow undulate
petals, prettily barred and blotched with brown, and a light yellow lip.
The latter is three-lobed, with a broad front lobe 3 inch across, and the
crest terminates in front in many yellow tubercles. The column wings are
rounded, bilobed, and fleshy, and thus it will be seen that the influence of
O. lamelligerum is very marked in the flower. The original plant received
a Certificate of Appreciation from the R.H.S. on December atst, 1909, and
was described in our pages (xviii. p. 8).

January, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 19

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.

By C. A-twyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
UNDER the above heading it is my intention to describe, month by month,
the various cultural details which should be performed by an amateur who
possesses a small heated house, which it is purposed to devote to the
fascinating hobby of Orchid growing. The misleading and erroneous idea
that Orchids cannot be cultivated except in specially constructed and
elaborate houses is gradually losing ground, and it is a well-proved fact that
certain Orchids can be grown successfully in almost any shaped house,
which may be situated in any locality, and that their culture is attended
with far less trouble than that required by many so-called greenhouse
plants.

When once the decision to begin Orchid culture is made, the amateur
will, doubtless, ask himself the question: ‘‘ Is my house suitable, or what
would it cost to erect one?” Taking the latter part first, a suitable house
in which to begin Orchid growing could be erected for £15. Brick sides
are not imperative, but heating by fire heat and the hot-water pipe system
is essential.

Few modifications are necessary in existing houses, always providing
the heating arrangements are correct. The main point to be observed is to
have zinc trays made to cover the staging. Fill these with moss, and the
atmosphere will never feel dry or stuffy. These trays should be as wide as
the staging, but do not have them more than two feet in length, otherwise
they lose their shape, and will not lie flat. Two shelves (in a span-roofed
house) should be made and suspended about one foot below the eaves. If
possible have the bottom ventilators on a level with the pipes, so that the
air may be warmed before it comes into contact with the plants. From
the above remarks it will be seen that the requirements of an amateur’s
smal] Orchid house are simple and few.

A suitable house being available, the question next arises as to what
species and hybrids should be grown. Here I would administer a word of
caution to beginners. Do not attempt to cultivate an endless variety of
species and genera, a far greater measure of success will be obtained by
cultivating only a few genera and species which require identical treat-
ment. I would advise the many species and hybrids of Odontoglossum,
the cool section of Oncidium, Cymbidiums, and cool species and hybrid
Cypripediums. In arranging the plants leave room for a free circulation of
air around each plant, and stand it either on an inverted pot or Orchid pan,
according to its size or height.

OpDonToGLossuMs.— Throughout this month the various representatives
of this genus will be in various stages of growth. A few O. crispum, hybrids,

20 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, I913-

Pescatorei, and Wilckeanum will be in flower, and some throwing up spikes,
whilst others will be at rest.

OncipiumMs.—Most of the species of this genus will be in flower, notably
crispum, Forbesii, incurvum, tigrinum, and varicosum. When they have
finished blooming, stand them on the elevated shelf.

CyMBIDIUMS.—Several members of this handsome genus will be in
flower, notably insigne, Tracyanum, and Winnianum. Lowianum will
probably be in full growth, and should receive weak liquid manure twice a
week. :

CyPRIPEDIUMS.—Undoubtedly many of these will be in full bloom, and
it is largely in those winter-blooming varieties that the utility of this genus
lies. C.aureum, Boxalli, insigne, exul, Hitchinsiz, Leeanum, Spicerianum,
and villosum are invaluable.

GENERAL REMARKS.

Little needs to be done in an Orchid house this month. It is too early
to repot any plant, and top-dressing should not yet be performed, and,
therefore, the chief operations consist in maintaining a damp atmosphere,
the correct degree of warmth, and in watering carefully. Damp the staging,
pipes, and path, twice a day if fine weather prevails, if otherwise once at
midday will be sufficient. An average temperature of 45°-50° Fahr. should
be maintained at night, with an optional rise of five degrees during the day,
or a little more with sun heat.

For a beginner the following rules are suggested with regard to watering
for this month: Growing plants, a good dose every other day. Flowering
plants, in fine weather once a day, on cold, sunless days, every alternate
day.. To all which are resting once a week will be found ample. With
respect to watering, there are a few facts which should be clearly impressed
upon the beginner: Should the temperature of the house fall below 45°
Fahr. do not water any plants until it has risen to the correct figure. When
applying water to any Orchid a good dose should be given, sufficient, in
fact, to thoroughly wet the whole compost, not a mere sprinkling on the
surface. Rain water, which in winter should be tepid, should always be
employed. Admit as much air as possible, but do not ventilate if the
thermometer stands below 48° Fahr.

Generally, during the middle of the day, a fair amount of air can be
admitted, but close the ventilators as soon as the temperature is liable
to fall below the prescribed degree. No shading is needed this month.
Group all plants which are at rest at the cooler end of the house. Here
they will remain inactive for a greater length of time than if placed at the
warmer end, and no mistakes need be made with regard to their watering.
Next month I shall hope to dwell at greater length on the important
subject of ventilation.

JaANuaARY, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 21

NOMENCLATURE OF HYBRIDS.
ECHOES OF A RECENT DISCUSSION.
A HYBRID of complex parentage, in which five species are supposed to be involved, has
recently received the name of Odontoglossum Lambardeanum, and the circumstance has
fed toa rather protracted discussion on the question of the nomenclature of hybrids in
general and the existing rules in particular.

A. This complex parentage is a fair example of the confusion which is
likely to arise from the application of Latin or Latinised names to garden-
raised Orchids. That is the root of the evil, and it is a curious fact that
the giving of Latin names to garden products was not begun by the raisers
of hybrid Orchids, either amateurs or nurserymen, but by scientific
botanists—

B. It began long before hybrid Orchids were even thought of.

A. In course of time the R.H.S. came to perceive that definite rules
must be laid down for the nomenclature of garden-raised Orchids, and a
sub-Committee was appointed to consider the subject. A rule was
established that, so far as possible, names in the vernacular should be given
to all garden-raised Orchids, but an exception had to be made in the case of
primary hybrids, because so many had already been named in the Latin by
early raisers—

B. I thought you said “ scientific botanists.” I have been looking up
the Report of that sub-Committee, and I find—I am reading from their

?

own report: ‘‘ Hybrids between species raised artificially should be named
in Latin.” ‘The Orchid Committee should decline to recognise any
unauthorised name, or any name that is deemed unsuitable, or one that
is not applied in conformity with the preceding rules.” That is rather
different.

A. The Committee were desirous of restricting the use of the Latinised
names to the compound forms adopted at the Paris Conference, such as
Digbyano-Mossiz—all departures from that method being in the vernacular,
and this method of the bi-nomial and fancy compound name, or the simple
name in the vernacular, worked well at the time, and was followed by most
of the principal raisers.

B. But the double name never worked well. When “ Digbyano-
Mossiz ’’ was proposed, the Gardeners’ Chronicle remarked: ‘‘ We hope
some means may be taken to render the name less cumbrous.” It is too
long, as our writers sometimes find when speaking of its white variety,
Queen Alexandra, so they omit it. The vernacular was tried, and
Cypripedium Charles Canham was described (by Be wd but was
promptly changed into Canhamii.

A. The method, I was saying, worked well, but Science once more

22 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JANUARY, 1913-

intervened. The Orchid Stud-Book was published, in which many compound
and fancy names were changed for Latinised appelations in a manner that
appears to us unwarranted.

B. But the Orchid Stud-Book adopted a simple and uniform rule, that
specific names should consist of a single word—the use of two short words
being permissible where they can be connected by a hyphen. It adopted
all classical and fancy names that agreed with the said rule, and it declined
to recognise others. It did what would have been done at the outset if the
R.H.S. rules had been followed, carrying out the original idea as far as
possible.

A. There is a fixed rule against such procedure. The Brussels
Congress rules say: ‘‘ No one has a right to alter a name or combination of
names without weighty reasons founded upon a very thorough knowledge
of the facts or upon the necessity of abandoning a nomenclature contrary to
the rules.”” Again they say: ‘‘ The specific name of a hybrid may be
expressed in Latin or in any language that is written in Roman characters.”

B. But what is the use of citing the rules of a Nomenclature Congress
that did not meet till long after the Orchid Stud-Book was published.
Besides, the clause beginning ‘‘ No one has a right to alter” is only a
saving clause under the section: ‘‘ Names that are to be rejected, dropped,
or modified,” and is only intended to prevent the abuse of a very necessary
rule.

A. There can be no question about the regularity of the names
superseded in the Orchid Stud-Book. Most of them were adopted by the
Committee of the R.H.S., many were awarded Certificates, described and
figured in the various periodicals, recorded in the Society’s Journal, and
appear among the nearly 2000 pictures of Certificated Orchids, with the
records duly filled in and signed by me as recorder.

B. The names superseded in the Orchid Stud-Book were neither regular
nor correct, and their number is the measure of the neglect of recorders to
observe existing rules.

A. The names were in accordance with the rules, and had the authority
of the Paris Nomenclature Conference.

B. I have the said Rules before me, but cannot find anything to support
the statement.

A. If it were competent for the authors of the Orchid Stud-Book to
proceed in the manner they have done, it would be equally excusable for
any set of self-constituted authorities—

B. That phrase has no application to the Orchid Stud-Book, for its
authors adopted the Vienna rules, embodying them in a short and simplified
wording. The Vienna rules say that the names of hybrids are subject to
the same rules as names of species, with the addition of the sign x before

January, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 23

the name, and that the rule applies to ternary hybrids, or those of a higher
(more complex) order.

A. There is another reason against this changing of names. It makes
an old plant into a novelty.

B. That is only an additional reason why the name chosen should be in
correct form at the outset.

A. My objection to Latinised names is that they are almost exclusively
personal complimentary names. The better way would be to give the
person’s name in full—Cattleya John Jones, not Cattleya Jonesii.

B. Then why did you give such names as Cypripedium Clinkaberryanum,
Leliocattleya Brymeriana, Dendrobium Owenianum, and many others ?

A. They were perfectly in order, as they were primary hybrids.

B. Not Leliocattleya Brymeriana, and you did not say it was originally.
But that is not the point. You say that such names are the “ root of the
evil.” I don’t, and there were already the precedents Leliocattleya
Aurora, Cassandra, Proserpine, Stella, Zenobia, &c. I have given scores o
others. They are admirable, but their use does not exclude such names as
Calanthe Dominyi, Veitchii, &c.

A. The Madison Congress resolved that all garden-raised plants should
be given specific names in the vernacular, and there is no other reasonable
course to take.

B. It does not prevent confusion. ‘‘ Chaos” was the only word that
the Gardeners’ Chronicle could think of as suitable to describe the condition
of things when the Orchid Stud-Book was published, and it said that the
work made a definite step towards the evolution of order. It was Chaos,
also, that led to the formation of the original R.H.S. Nomenclature
Committee, of which you were a member. You helped to draw up the
rules, the neglect of which has necessitated so many names being “ rejected,
dropped, or modified,’’ and now you censure those who attempt to carry
the rules into practice. Even the R.H.S. defends the system adopted. It
has published its replies to questions submitted to it by the Brussels
Congress, which were based on examples taken directly from the Orchid
Stud-Book. The answers are: ‘‘ The specific names of these hybrids should
be in the Latin form.” ‘‘ These specific names should consist of a single
word.”

A. You quote the Vienna rules as saying: ‘‘ Ternary hybrids, or those
of a higher (more complex) order are designated like ordinary hybrids.”
That implies that the more mixed the parentage the higher the order in
their standing as hybrids. The Brussels rules clearly indicate the nature of
the hybrid of a higher order: ‘‘ Ternary hybrids or those of a higher order
(crosses between species of the same genus).”

B. That is erroneous. Such a phrase would indicate primary hybrids,

24 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

which had been dealt with in a previous sentence. It simply means “ more
complex,” that is to say, hybrids containing three, four, or even five species.
A plant is not less a hybrid because two or three additional species are
brought into the ancestry. And you should have finished quoting the rule :
‘‘ The name, which is' subject to the same rule as the names of species.”
You should also have cited the example given: “‘ X Salix Staehleri.’”’ Both
testify against you, and confirm the practice of the Orchid Stud-Book, of two
years earlier date.

C. Gardeners are themselves largely to blame for these fearful Orchid
names, because instead of naming their home-bred Orchids as other breeders
.do, they asked the botanists to do it for them. I am heretic enough to say,
** blow the conferences and confound the botanists who have helped to make
Orchid names what so many of them are.’’ (Proceeds to quote a string of
them, nine in number). .

B. Three of those names were given by nurserymen or amateurs, and
not one of the others was given by a botanist in that incorrect form. . Two
are not even current, and one is purely imaginery. Even those in current
use are only so in opposition to rule. Do you call that criticism ?

C. Only last week two new Orchids were shown and certified as Sophro-
Lzlio-Cattleya Carna and Lzlio-Cattleya Golden Oriole var. Ruby. I
should have called them Cattleya Carna and Cattleya Ruby. The plain
common sense plan would be to give a hybrid the’same generic name as
the parent it most resembled. ‘‘I would mop off these long and ugly
names and substitute better.”’

B. The plants you mentioned are not Cattleyas at all, and one of them
has already a specific name. Your plan would not only give us several
different specific names for seedlings out of the same capsule-——Cypripedium
aureum over again—but it would even put some of them in one genus and
some in the other.

C. Names should be easy to read, write, and speak. ©

B. 1 agree, and you could easily have cited me as one of the earliest
and most consistent advocates of the system—Cattleya Zenobia dates from
1887. I seldom use any other when personal choice is possible.

C. That proves that many Orchid names are abominable. My little
dog was named Nebuchadnezzar, but my children insisted that Neb. was
long enough.

The moral of this discussion seems to be that those who name our plants
should observe the rules which have been drawn up by representative
Committees for their guidance, and that confusion in nomenclature arises
chiefly from their neglect ; not from the use of Latin names. If it has this
effect the discussion will have served a useful purpose.

January, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW.

BRASSOCATTLEYA LANGLEYENSIS.

ure represents a fine form ot Brassocattleva

THE above

(Cattleya Schroedere2 x Brassavola Digbyana) which was

ATTLEYA LANGLEYENSIS.

RASSOC

)
)

l

26 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913

the magnificent group of Orchids (staged by Lt.-Col. Sir George L.
Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander), at the Royal Inter-
national Horticultural Exhibition, Chelsea, last May, and which won the:
King’s Cup. The flowers are very large, of excellent shape, and the colour
a delicate pink, with a light yellow disc to the lip. This form was raised in
the collection. The original form was raised by Messrs. James Veitch and
Sons, Langley, and flowered for the first time in March, 1902, when it
received a First-class Certificate from the R.H.S. under the name of
Leliocattleya Digbyano-Schroedere (O.R., x. p. 117). The name was
afterwards amended to Brassocattleya langleyensis (Orchid Stud-Book p. 45)-

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR JANUARY.

By J. T. Barker, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
TIME, with its chastening hand, again brings us to the opening of another
year, and with it we see the commencement of the twenty-first volume of
the Orchid Review. During the twenty years of its existence Orchidology
has made immense strides, especially in the departments of the cultivator
and the hybridist, and in this development the influence of the Review has.
been a power for good. We cordially wish it increasing success in the days.
to come.

The work of the present month will consist chiefly in maintaining the
proper temperatures, providing suitable atmospheric conditions in the
houses, and the cleansing of the plants and the houses. The plants should
be kept as quiet as possible, no attempt being made to unduly push them
into growth, as this premature growth is never satisfactory, and in many
cases damps off, and sets up decay of the rhizome.

TEMPERATURES:—The most suitable temperatures for the different
departments are as follows :—

Cool house: day, 50° to 55°, with sun, 60° ; night, 50°.

Intermediate house: day, 60° to 65°, with sun, 66°; night, 57° to 60°.

Cattleya and Mexican houses: day, 60° to 65°, with sun, 68°; night, 58°-

East Indian house: day, 65° to 70°, with sun, 75°: night, 65°.

These figures are only given as a guide, as no harm will accrue from slight
variations either way, but if the temperatures are allowed to fluctuate
widely serious damage may occur.

VENTILATION.— The ventilation of the houses at this season must have:
most careful attention at all times. They should be re-charged with pure
air every day Ly some means, as a stagnant atmosphere is most injurious.
The admission of fresh air to the houses does not, in many cases, get the
attention it should have, and the observant grower will soon find the
difference between a badly ventilated and a judiciously ventilated one. It

JANuaRy, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 27

is wonderful the effect of a single ventilator being open on the inside of
the house, even for half an hour during the day, if only open, say, a quarter
of an inch. To those who are troubled with houses that feel stuffy and
oppressive I would recommend the experiment of admitting more air both
during the night as well as by day. Draughts, however, must be avoided,
as these are highly injurious to all plant life.

ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE must be regulated according to the outside
conditions. Should the weather be clear and bright, or should it be
necessary to use much fire heat, more moisture is required than is necessary
when the outside atmosphere is heavily charged with moisture. The great
thing to avoid at all times is a low temperature heavily charged with
. moisture, many so-called diseases of plants are attributable to houses being
kept in this condition.

WATERING.—At this season of the year the greatest care must be taken
in watering the plants, as this is the great secret of successful cultivation.
An excess of water causes the roots to decay, and an insufficiency causes
them to wither and die, and the loss of roots to any plant spells disaster.
Plants differ so much, even of the same species, in the amount of moisture
they are capable of taking up that the grower must use his own powers of
observation as to whether they require water or not. The condition
of the compost in which the plant is growing has to be taken into
consideration, as some composts retain water more than others. At this
season it is wise to err on the side of carefulness. Avoid a water-logged,
saturated compost at all times.

ODONTOGLOs3uUMs that are showing for flower should be carefully and
neatly staked up as the spikes become long enough. They are best set by
themselves when done, so that they can be examined from time to time
for slugs, which devour the spikes and do irreparable harm. Small, weakly
plants should have their spikes removed as soon as they show, as these
plants should not be allowed to flower until they get fairly strong, and then
only be allowed to produce one or two flowers. The house should be
vapourized from time to time as a preventive against thrip and other
pests. Many plants towards the end of the month will be starting into:
growth, and may be repotted, but it is not wise to do them until they get
into the desired condition, namely, when they are about to push new roots.

MILTONIAs that are now growing in the Intermediate house, exposed to
all the light possible, may have water afforded them whenever they become
dry. The compost should be allowed to get into this condition between
each operation. The usual precaution against thrip—the arch enemy of
this plant—-must be taken, as, if allowed to obtain a foothold at this season
it will disfigure the leaves and do much harm.

CaTTLEyas.—The present month is the quietest in the whole year for

a8 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

these beautiful plants, not many species or hybrids being in ower. A few,
however, will always be in bloom where a representative collection is
grown, especially the hybrids. C. Percivaliana and C. Trianz will develop
their flowers during this month, and will be most acceptable during the
dull days often prevailing at this season.

L2&LIA ANCEPS and its varieties, now in full bloom, make an attractive
display, and where flowers are required in quantity at this season are most
useful. The plants should be kept moderately dry, but sufficient water
should be given to keep the bulbs plump and the roots healthy.

SOPHRONITIS GRANDIFLORA.— This delightful miniature gem, having now
expanded its scarlet flowers in the Cool house, will remain in bloom for
fully a month, therefore should be grown in quantity. Water should be
given whenever they become dry. After the flowers have faded, and the
bulbs are fully matured, much less water at the roots will suffice, but even
then they must not be allowed to become dry at the roots, which is
detrimental to them at any time. Repotting is best deferred until the
plants are seen to be pushing roots from the half-made pseudobulbs. They
thrive best suspended, well up to the light, at the warmest end of the Cool
house, with a free circulation of fresh air.

LycasTE SKINNERI.—The earliest plants of this popular species are
already pushing up their flowers, and to prolong the season they may be
placed in a slightly higher temperature than that in which they have been
grown, as this will assist the flower scapes in their development. The
plants at this season should be kept moderately dry at the roots, and a cool
intermediate temperature answers their requirements.

CyYPRIPEDIUMS, as they pass out of bloom, should be examined, and any
that are in need of repotting should have attention. The pots should be
well-drained, and the plants potted moderately firmly, using a compost as
follows : Two parts best fibrous peat, one part osmunda, polypodium, and
loam fibre, and a liberal mixture of sphagnum moss. The usual precautions
as to watering newly-potted plants must be observed. The later-flowering
species which are pushing up their spikes must have water afforded them
whenever they become dry.

CaLias.—Such Orchids as C. bella, C. Baueriana, and C. macrostachya
re not often seen, but are well worth including in representative collections,
especially the first-named species, its purple-tipped sepals and lip of canary
yellow being very attractive. These plants are now starting into growth,
and should be repotted if necessary. The pots should have ample
drainage, and a similar compost to that used for Miltonias. They will
succeed under the same conditions as that Orchid at this season, in a light
position in the Intermediate house. When the plants are thoroughly
established they should have liberal supplies of water.

JANUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 29°

DENDROBIUMS.—Plants of these useful Orchids that have been rested in
a house of comparatively cool temperature, and on which the flower buds are:
well advanced, may now be placed in a slightly warmer house. A light
position in the cool Intermediate house is suitable for them during their
early stages, and later on a slightly higher temperature will do no harm.
But there is great danger of these plants throwing the whole of their buds
if placed in excessive warmth during bud formation, which should, there-
fore, be avoided. Care should be taken in the application of water to the
roots of plants that are in this condition, but they must not be allowed to
suffer for want of it.

UMS.—As soon as the growth of D. glumaceum and the
variety validum reach a height of two or three inches they commence to
push forth a number of roots, and if repotting is required this is a suitable
time to perform the operation. They will succeed in the same compost as
Cypripediums, and should be potted in the same manner. They delight in
a fairly humid position in the Intermediate house, and the delicate perfume
of the flowers of D. glumaceum makes its slender grass-like flower spikes.
an acceptable ornament to our houses. .

SPATHOGLOTTIS.—Such species as S. aurea, S. Lobbii, S. Fortunei, S.
Vieillardii, S. Kimballiana, S. plicata, and the hybrids, S. aureo-Vieillardii
and S. Colmanii, delight in the temperature of the warmest house when in
full growth. These plants are often rested too severely, thereby causing a
check, which, especially with S. Fortunei and S. Lobbii, may do irreparable
harm. The plants should not be allowed to remain dry for any length of
time, but have sufficient water to keep them plump and healthy. The
hybrids, S. aureo-Vieillardii and S. Colmanii, are now pushing up their
flower-spikes, and must be carefully watered, for with an excess of water
there is a danger of the flower spikes damping off and the plants starting
into premature growth. As the spikes get. long enough they should be
carefully tied to neat stakes, otherwise there is a danger of their getting
broken. When the plants commence to grow they may be repotted in a
similar compost to that used for Cypripediums. They should not be potted
too firmly, and be carefully watered until they become re-established.

C@LOGYNE CRISTATA and its varieties are pushing up their flower spikes,
and must have water whenever they become dry. After flowering they should
be induced to rest. C. pandurata and other varieties, as they commence to
grow, may be watered whenever they become dry. Those at rest must
only have sufficient to prevent shrivelling, as many of the varieties will not
flower unless they are subjected to a good rest.

DecIpuous CALANTHES.—These useful Orchids, as they pass out of
flower, should be placed in a safe position to rest, avoiding too low a
temperature or much harm may accrue.

30 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913,

GENERAL REMARKS.—This month is usually the coldest in the year.
and we may expect some changeable weather, therefore every precaution
should be taken against fluctuation of temperatures in the houses, as these,
if drastic, are apt to do much harm. The cleansing of the houses and the
plants, if not already completed, should be brought to a conclusion as
speedily as possible. The stocks of potting material, such as peat, fibres,
and sphagnum moss, with other necessary materials, should be got in, so
that when the busy season arrives there is no delay. A well-laid plan will
greatly assist in getting through the work in the busy season, and lead to
much being accomplished that would not be done under other circumstances.

SOCIETIES.
RoyAL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on November 19th, 1912, when there was a very fine display
.of Orchids, the leading feature being a brilliant group of Vanda ccerulea,
which gained both a Gold and a Lindley Medal. Five other Medals,
two First-class Certificates, and two Awards of Merit were also given.

Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair), Messrs.
J. O’Brien, de Barri Crawshay, R. Brooman White, W. Bolton, W.
White, A. Dye, W. P. Bound, H. G. Alexander, J. E. Shill, W. H.
Hatcher, J. Cypher, J. Charlesworth, C. H. Curtis, A. McBean, F. Sander,
T. Armstrong, F. J. Hanbury, R. G. Thwaites, R. A. Rolfe, C. J. Lucas,
and Gurney Wilson.

His Grace the Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace (gr. Mr. Hunter),
staged a magnificent group, consisting mainly of about 200 well-flowered
Vanda coerulea, in a space thirty-six feet long by six feet deep. The
middle and ends were raised, and the front and lower part of the group
-consisted of many well-grown Cypripedium insigne Sandere, with a few
other Cypripediums, which afforded a good contrast to the blue of the
Vandas. A Gold Medal anda Silver Lindley Medal for excellent culture
-~were deservedly awarded.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent the pretty
Sophrocatlelia Olive Fairlawn var., a well-shaped rosy-red flower, Odonto-
glossum amabile Rosetta, and the handsome Cattleya Iris King George V.

Lady Theodora Guelph, Inwood, Templecombe (gr. Mr. Hester), sent
Cattleya Neptune (labiata x Schilleriana).

F. A. Hindley, Esq., Croft Villa, Great Horton, Bradford, sent
Cypripedium Hassallii Hindley’s var. (bingleyense X Charlesworthii), a
well-shaped flower, with a rosy-tinted dorsal sepal.

Lieut.-Col. Sir George I. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent Laliocattleya Neleus (C. Iris x L.-c. Ophir), a handsome

.

JANUARY, 1y13-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 31

flower, most like the latter in shape, and having greenish yellow sepals and
petals, and a crimson lip.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent
Leliocattleya Adolph-Iris (L.-c. Adolphus x C. Iris), having Indian yellow
sepals and petals spotted with red, and the front lobe of the lip crimson.

C. J. Lucas, Esq., Warnham Court, Horsham (gr. Mr. Duncan), sent
Leliocattleya Muriel, a pretty white flower, and Cypripedium Harlequin.

W. Thom, Esq., Athol House, Blackburn (gr. Mr. Stretford), showed
Cypripedium Bulgar (insigne Harefield Hall var. X Parkerianum).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park. staged a fine group, including
Cattleya Dusseldorfii Undine, white varieties of C. labiata, some good C.
Fabia, Dendrobium Phaleznopsis, and Oncidium varicosum Rogersii,
Leliocattleya St. Gothard, Calanthe veratrifolia, Odontoglossums,
Epicattleya Nebo, Vanda ccerulea, the interesting Lowiara insignis
(Sophronitis grandiflora x Brassolelia Helen), described at page 360 of
our last volume, Cypripedium Charlesworthii, and many others (Silver
Flora Medal).

Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a fine group of Cypri-
pediums, including C. Thalia giganteum, Swinburnei magnificum, the fine
Charlesianum Cypher’s var., fulshawense, Milo Westonbirt var., many good
forms of Leeanum, insigne, Actzeus, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a very pretty group, including
a brilliant Leliocattleya Haroldiana, some good Cattleyas and Odonto-
glossums, Cypripedium Dreadnought, Lord Nelson, Pyramus var. Black
Prince (Euryades X Mrs. Wm. Mostyn), a fine dark form, and many others,
Ccelogyne brunnea, Masdevallia trinema, Cirrhopetalum Medusz, Lycaste
Mary Gratrix, Bulbophyllum hirtum and Careyanum, Oncidium bicallosum,
and other good things (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a fine group, including
Odontoglossum Anaphe (Uroskinneri X crispum), a prettily spotted flower,
a fine hybrid between Cattleya Dowiana aurea ¢ and Brassolzlia Veitchii 3,
having flowers of a rosy mauve shade, Cypripedium Baron Schréder, some
good forms of C. insigne, Leeanum, Euryades, and others (Silver Banksian
Medal).

Messrs. Swan & Price, Keyfield Nursery, St. Albans, staged a good
group of Cypripediums, including C. Baron Schréder, Niobe, Germaine
Opoix, triumphans, good forms of C. insigne, Leeanum, Actzus, and others
{Bronze Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards [leath, staged a choice little
group, including Oncidioda Marjorie (C. Neetzliana X O. Forbesii), a pretty
bronzy flower of intermediate character, with’ the front of the lip light
yellow, Oncidium hybridum with a strong branched spike, Sophrocattleya

32 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913-

Saxa, Trichopilia Gouldii (nobilis x suavis), bearing a spike of five white
and fragrant flowers, Catasetum discolor, Oncidium varicosum concolor,
Sarcopodium Ccelogyne, Angraecum infundibulare, and some good Odonto-
glossums, including a richly-coloured, home-raised O. crispum.

Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent Cattleya labiata
Helene, a clear white form with a violet blotch on the lip, and a hand-
somely blotched Odontoglossum.

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged good group of Cattleyas and
Cypripediums, a fine Angrecum infundibulare, and Sarcopodium Ceelogyne.

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent Lzeliocattleya auto-
Doin (Lelia autumnalis x Cattleya Octave Doin), a pretty rosy flower
with a white base to the lip.

FirstT-CLAss CERTIFICATES.

CYPRIPEDIUM ELATIOR (Leeanum X Baron Schréder).—A very beautiful
hybrid bearing four flowers, the dorsal sepal white, heavily blotched with
purple, and the petals and lip greenish yellow, suffused and marked with
brown. Exhibited by F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr.
Balmforth).

LA&LIOCATTLEYA BELLA ORCHID DENE VAR. (L. purpurata x C. labiata).
—A very fine form, having rosy purple sepals and petals, and the lip rich
purple-crimson in front. Exhibited by Mr. E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid
Dene, Twyford.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CYPRIPEDIUM LatTona (Niobe x. Alcibiades).—A well-shaped flower,
having a white dorsal sepal, with green base, and lines of large purple
blotches, and the sepals and petals greenish yellow and brown. Exhibited
by Lieut.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.

L#LIOCATTLEYA SCYLLA (L.-c. Cappei X C. Rothschildiana).—A very
pretty hybrid, having fiue apricot-yellow flowers, tinged with rose on the
margin of the lip. Exhibited by F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., Oxford.

At the meeting held on December 3rd there was again a fine display of
Orchids, and the Awards consisted of five Medals, two First-class
Certificates, three Awards of Merit, and one Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), J-
O’Brien, J. S. Moss, Gurney Wilson, J. Wilson Potter, R. G. Thwaites,
F. Sander, R. A. Rolfe, T. Armstrong, A. McBean, C. H. Curtis, W. Cobb,
J. Charlesworth, J Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, J. E. Shill, H. G. Alexander, A.
Dye, W. P. Bound, W. Bolton, de B. Crawshay, Sir Jeremiah Colman,
and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood),
staged a very interesting group, to which a Silver Banksian Medal was

i a

January, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 33

awarded. The front consisted of some well-grown Cypripedium insigne
Sanderz, and we noted C. i. Bohnhofianum and Harefield Hall var., C.
Leeanum and Pittianum, Cattleya Clarkiz, Dendrobium Phalznopsis,
Chondropetalum Fletcheri, Maxillaria Hubschii, Miltonia Bleuana,
Odontoglossum armainvillierense Pittianum, and others.

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis),
showed Odontioda Latona, Odontoglossum Lambeauianum with a well.
branched spike, and the fine Cypripedium Leeanum J. Gurney Fowler.

Lieut.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent the charming Vanda ccerulea Sanderz, bearing two fine
ten-flowered spikes of clear pink flowers, and Cypripedium Nydia
(Niobe X nitens-Leeanum).

His Grace the Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace, Woodstock (gr.
Mr. Hunter), sent Cypripedium Beatrice (aureum Hyeanum X memoria
Jerninghamiz). :

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including a
plant of Chondropetalum Fletcheri bearing two spikes of four flowers each,
in which the lip was minutely fringed at the margin, Cattleya Sylvia,
Lzliocattleya Golden Oriole, Statteriana, and others, Govenia Gardneri,
and a lot of good Cypripediums, noteworthy among them being C. Conquest
(Earl of Tankerville xX Leeanum Clinkaberryanum), C. Smaragdina
(Euryades X Ville de Paris), C. St.-Andre (Leeanum xX. Actzus brugense),
having a large white dorsal sepal, with a green base, a dark purple median
band, and few small purple spots, C. Arthur-Sanderz, Vandyck, Troilus,
and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a showy group, containing
about three dozen seedling Zygopetalum Mackayi, obtained by crossing
. this species with Odontoglossum crispum, but, as usual, no trace of the
Odontoglossum could be detected, Leliocattleya Pallas, Brassocatleelia
Morna (B.-c. Maroniz X L.-c. bletchleyensis), a pretty rose-pink flower,
Odontoglossum Wilckeanum, Cypripedium Germaine Opoix, C. Idina
(insigne Harefield Hall var. X Countess of Carnarvon), San-Actzus,
Tracyanum, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a pretty group of
Cypripediums, with Lelia anceps Schroedere, Leliocattleya Rubens,
Zygopetalum crinitum, Cattleya Harrisoniana, Masdevallia Schreederiana,
Calanthe Harrisii, Cymbidium Tracyanum, &c. (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. W. B. Hartland & Sons, Cork, staged a pretty little group, in-
cluding Odontoglossum Groganize, with a well-branched spike of purple
flowers, and other Odontoglossums, a fine home-raised Cattleya Hardyana,
Vanda tricolor, some good Cypripedium insigne Sanderz, and others (Silver
Banksian Medal).

34 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a small group of Cypripediums,
Cattleyas, Lzliocattleyas, Vanda suavis, &c. (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
containing some good Cypripediums, Odontiodas, Sophrocattleya heaton-
ensis, Brassocattleya Rutherfordii, &c., with a fine plant of Angraecum
sesquipedale, bearing ten flowers, in the centre.

Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent a very pretty bybrid
from Cattleya Dowiana aurea and Leliocattleya Gottoiana, having primrose
yellow sepals and petals, freckled with rose at the tips, and the lip rosy
crimson with some yellow veining.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, sent Cypripedium Eva
(aureum Hyeanum X memoria Jerninghamiz).

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent several hybrid Odonto-
glossums, three Cattleya aurensis, some good Cypripediums, Cymbidium
Doris, and a good form of C. Wiganianum.

Messrs. Swan & Price, St. Albans, sent Cypripedium Maurice, C,
Germaine Opoix, and a few other good Cypripediums.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

LA&LIOCATTLEYA GOLDEN ORIOLE VaR. Rupy (L.-c. Charlesworthii Xx
C. Dowiana aurea).—A very richly-coloured form, having claret-red flowers,
with narrow yellow lines on the base of the lip. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir
George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.

Opontiopa Latona FowLeEr’s VAR. (Odontioda Bradshawie x Odonto-
glossum spectabile).—A handsome hybrid, having the sepals and petals
heavily blotched with brownish crimson on a rosy blush ground, and
margined with rose, the lip being white, with a bright yellow crest and a
large reddish blotch in front. Exhibited by J. Gurney Fowler, Esq.,
S. Woodford. There were eight Howers, but the terminal one was missing,
which led to some discussion because of the rule against disbudding.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CYPRIPEDIUM EvuryspiapEs (Euryades x Alcibiades).—A large and
striking flower, having a white dorsal sepal, spotted with dark purple, and
an emerald green base, and the petals and lip yellowish green suffused with
purple-brown. Exhibited by Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Bur-
ford (gr. Mr. White).

CYPRIPEDIUM VIKING (Buchanianum illustre).—A large and striking
hybrid, having a broad white dorsal sepal with a prominent violet-purple
median band, and the petals and lip yellow, suffused and marked with
brown. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.

- SOPHROCATLZELIA CARNA (L.-c. Cappei xX S.-l. heatonensis).—A large
and handsome hybrid, having: a miagenta rose flower, with a buff yellow
throat to the lip.

January, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 35

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

SIGMATOSTALIX RADICANS.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to Sir
Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford, for a very large specimen,
covered with flowers.

MANCHESTER & NORTH oF ENGLAND ORCHID.
At the meeting held on Thursday, November t4th, in the Town Hall,
Manchester, the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Cromble-
holme (in the Chair), R. Ashworth, J. Cypher, J. Evans, W. Holmes, 4:
Lupton, C. Parker, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), was awarded a Gold
Medal for a group composed principally of Cypripediums, all the finest
varieties in cultivation, with several fine Cattleyas of the labiata and Portia
section.

Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), was also awarded
a Gold Medal for a very effective mixed group, including Cattleyas of the
labiata section, Octave Doin, Portia, Lzliocattleya callistoglossa, Odonto-
glossum armainvillierense, Ceres, crispum and hybrids in variety, Oncidium
tigrinium, and Cypridiums of sorts.

Mrs. A. K. Wood, Glossop (gr. Mr. Gould), was awarded a Silver- gilt
Medal for a very pleasing display, including Cattleyas in variety, Lzlio=
cattleyas, including Orion, Oncidium tigrinum, Cypripediums, and several
plants of Vanda ccerulea—to one of which, Moorfield var., were awarded a
Cultural Certificate and Bronze Medal to the gardener.

A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), staged a nice
group, to which a Silver-gilt Medal was awarded. It contained Cattleyas
of the labiata section and hybrids, Odontoglossum crispum (fine forms),
and hybrids, Cypripediums in variety, including Leeanum Clinkaberryanum,
Euryades Warburtonianum, Thalia magnificum, and insigne in variety.

R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), was awarded a Large
Silver Medal for a choice group, including Cattleya Portia superba (C.C.
and Bronze Medal to gardener), Sophrocatlelia rubra, Odontoglossum
rubrum, Bronze Dragon, amabile Triton, eximium, Adriane, Fascinator,
crispum, Odontioda Bohnhofiz, Cypripedium Priam, villosum, Sir Trevor,
and Dendrobium Phaleznopsus album.

Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), was
awarded a Silver Medal for a small group of Cypripediums, including
varieties of insigne and Leeanum, with tesselatum, Milo, and eboriacum.

J. McCartney, Esq., Bolton (gr. Mr. Holmes), was also awarded a Silver
Medal for a group, including Cypripedium insigne Chantinii Lindenii,
Laura Kimball, and Sanderz, C. Hitchinsiz, Arthurianum, and Mrs. i
McCartney.

35 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JaNuaRY, 1913:

Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, were awarded a Gold Medal for
a magnificent display of Cypripediums of the insigne section, in great
variety, with C. Leeanum and hybrids, Cattleyas, Oncidiums, Cymbidiums
and hybrids of same.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, were awarded a Silver-
gilt Medal for a choice group, including Odontoglossum crispum xanthotes,
and others, Cattleyas and Leeliocattleyas, Cypripediums in variety, and
Cymbidium erythrostylum. ;

Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, staged a few choice Cypri-
pediums, including Sanacderz, Hannibal, Maudiz, Rossetti, and insigne
Sandere Keeling’s var., entirely without spots.

Mr. J. Evans, Congleton, staged Cattleya Amesize x callistoglossa,
Odontoglossum hybrid, and Cypripedium Actzeus Drewett’s var.

First-class CERTIFICATE .

Cattleya labiata Cyme, a large well-set flower, with pure white sepals

and petals, and faint colour in the lip. From Col. J. Rutherford.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cattleya labiata vestalis, Cypripedium Actzus ashlandense No. 2, and
C. insigne Rossendale (i. Sanderee x i. Laura Kimball). All from R.
Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch.

At the meeting held on November 28th, 1912, the members of Committee
present were: Z. A. Ward, Esq. (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, a
Bamber, J. C. Cowan, J. Cypher, J. Evans, W. Hatcher, W. Holmes, mc
Lupton, D. McLeod, W. Morgan, C. Parker, F. K. Sander, H. Thorp, A.
Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden), for a very fine group of Odontoylossums, Cattleyas, Cypri-
pediums, Sophrocattleya Doris, Miltonia Bleuana, and other choice things.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Black-
burn (gr. Mr. Lupton); A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish) ;
and Z. A. Ward, Esq. Northenden (gr. Mr. Weatherby) ; for fine groups.

Silver Medals were awarded to J. McCartney, Esq., Bolton (gr. Mr.
Holmes) ; S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gt. Mr. Brown); A. E. Penny,
Esq., Preston (gr. Mr. Sumner) ; and Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham ;
for good groups.

A large Bronze Medal was awarded to the Rev. J. Crombleholme,
Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a small group of choice
Cypripediums.

A Special Vote of Thanks was accorded to O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge
Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), for a magnificent and varied display of Cypri-
pediums, including many specimen plants.

ST eC ey

JANuARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIFW. 37

Interesting exhibits were also contributed by W. J. Hargreaves, Esq.,
Burnley ;_F. A. Hindley, Esq., Bradford; Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons,
Bradford; Stuart Low & Co., Enfield ; and Sander & Sons, St. Albans.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

Cypripedium Maudiz var. John Martendale Gratrix, a large and hand-

some flower of brilliant colour. From S. Gratrix, Esq.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Mary Gratrix (A2son giganteum xX Leeanum Corona).
From S. Gratrix, Esq.

Cypripedium Draco (insigne X Euryades) and Odontoglossum crispum
var. Bulgar. From Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Cypripedium Strelsa (Alcibiades x insigne Harefield Hall var.). From
W. R. Lee, Beg:

Cypripedium Bulgar (Parkerianum X insigne Harefield Hall var.).
From Wm. Thom, junr., Esq. -

Lycaste cruenta. From Messrs. A. J: Keeling & Sons.

BoTANICAL CERTIFICATE.

Eria (species unknown). From Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

At the meeting held on December 5th, 1912, the members of Committee
present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth,
J. Bamber, J. Cypher, A. Hanmer, W. Holmes, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, C.
Parker, Z. A. Ward, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Gold Medal was awarded to Mr. Rogers, gardener to O. O. Wrigley,
Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury, for the fine group of Cypripediums exhibited at
the previous meeting.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch
(gr. Mr. Gilden); S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr. Brown); Col.
J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton); A. Warburton, Esq.,
Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish); Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr.
Weatherby) ; and Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, for fine groups.

A Silver Medal was awarded to J. McCartney, Esq., Bolton (gr. Mr.
Holmes), for a good group of Cattleyas, Lzliocattleyas, Oncidiums and
Cypripediums.

Bronze Medals were awarded to F. A. Hindley, Esq., Bradford, and G.
H. Peace, Esq., Monton Grange (gr. Mr. Mace), for groups of Cypripediums.

Interesting exhibits also came from H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn; W.
Thompson, Esq., Stone (gr. Mr. Howes); Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons,
Bradford, and Sander & Sons, St. Albans.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Lion (Boadicea X Sallieri Hyeanum), and C. Queen Maud

(insigne Harefield Hall var. x ?). From S. Gratrix, Esq. -

38 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY. 1913:

Cypripedium Cynosure (parentage unknown). From R. Ashworth, Esq.
Epidendrum vitellinum autumnale. From Wm. Thompson, Esq.
First-cLass BoTANICAL CERTIFICATE.
Masdevallia cucullata. From Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.
CULTURAL CERTIFICATES.

Mr. A. Dalgleish, gardener to A. Warburton, Esq., for Cypripedium
insigne MacNabianum.

Mr. J. Howes, gardener to Wm. Thompson, Esq., for Cypripedium Our
King.

At the meeting held on Thursday, December roth, 1912, the members
of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs.
R. Ashworth, J. Cypher, J. Evans, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, C. Parker, H.
Thorp, Z. A. Ward, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

Large Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Black-
burn (gr. Mr. Holmes); A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr.
Dalgleish) ; and Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr. Weatherby), for
fine groups.

Silver Medals were awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden); F. A. Hindley, Esq., Great Horton, Bradford; G. H. Peace,
Esq., Monton Grange (gr. Mr. Mace); Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons,
Cheltenham; and A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, for good groups..

Bronze Medals were awarded to H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn, and the
Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for small
groups of Cypripediums. |

A Special Vote of Thanks was accorded to O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge
Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), for a choice group of Cypripediums, in
well-grown examples, Odontoglossum crispum, and a fine plant of Lelia
Gouldiana.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

Cypripedium Goliath (Amy Moore x insigne Harefield Hall var.), a

magnificent, well-balanced flower. From W. R. Lee, Esq.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Fouldsianum (Fascinator x Clinkaberryanum). From
J. H. Craven, Esq.

Odontoglossum Wilckeanum var. From Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Cypripedium hybrid (King Edward VII. x insigne Harefield Hall var.).
From A. Warburton, Esq.

L&LIOCATTLEYA Goldfinch Ashlands var. (L.-c. warnhamensis x C.
Dowiana aurea). From R. Ashworth, Esq.

Cymbidium woodlandense (Tracyanum X Mastersii). From H. Arthur,
Esq., Blackburn.

January, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 39

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during January, on the
7th and 21st, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour,
12 o'clock noon. The following meeting will be held on February 4th.

The Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will hold
meetings at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on January 2nd and 16th.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection
from 1 to 4 p.m. The following meeting is fixed for February 6th.

R.H.S. Screntiric ComMMItTrEE.—The following references to Orchids
exhibited at the meetings of the Committee are taken from the Official
Report (continued from vol. xx. page 352) :—

November 5th : CATASETUM MACROCARPUM, FEMALE FLOWER.—Mr. G.
Rae Fraser, Letchmore Heath, Herts., sent an inflorescence of Catasetum

-macrocarpum bearing six female flowers, from the same plant as the one
exhibited on October 8th, rg10. He remarked that the plant has made
three futile attempts to flower since then, and at the fourth had produced
the present spike. Mr. R. A. Rolfe reported that it agreed with the plant
figured as Monachanthus viridis, by Lindley, in the Botanical Register
(t. 1752), from a plant which flowered with Lord Fitzwilliam, at Went-
worth, which is now known as the female of Catasetum macrocarpum,
Rich. It is not, however, the original Monachanthus viridis, Lindl., which
is the female of another species.

November rgth: ONcIpIODA X MARJORIE. — Messrs. Charlesworth
& Co. sent a plant resulting from a cross between Cochlioda Neetzliana and
Oncidium Forbesii. Several crosses between members of these genera have
now flowered, and Messrs. Charlesworth were awarded a Certificate of
Appreciation in 1910 in recognition of their work in demonstrating the
possibility of uniting these genera, which, although sufficiently distinct
morphologically, are evidently closely allied physiologically.

December 3rd: La:Li1d PUMILA X LasLIOCATTLEYA OPHIR (Lelia
xanthina X Cattleya Dowiana aurea). Mr. G. Wilson said this hybrid
with cream-white sepals and petals and purple labellum was raised by
Mr. R. G. Thwaites, of Streatham Hill, and was shown by him in support of
his hypothesis that white flowers are produced by a mixture of red, blue,
and yellow.

HABENARIA R@BELENII.—This is a very striking novelty which is now
flowering with Mr. S. W. Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham. It isa
native of Annam, and is allied to the brilliantly-coloured H. militaris. The
flowers of the two are very similar in general character, especially in the
shape of the bright scarlét lip, but the novelty differs in having the sepals,

40 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JANUARY, 1913.

petals, the spur of the lip, and even the column and the two clavate stigmas
bright red in colour. The first of the batch to bloom is bearing a scape
about half-a-foot high, with six flowers, and several lanceolate, acuminate
leaves, 34 to 5 inches long by about half an inch broad, with a very
undulate margin, and the colour nearly uniform olive-green. H. militaris,
Rchb. f., is a native of Cochin China. The two other allies are H.
rhodochila, Hance, a native of South China, and H. xanthochila, Ridl., a
native of Penang.—R.A.R.

ORC PORTRAITS.

CATTLEYA DUPREANA THE DELL VAR.—Gard. Chron., 1912, ii. pp. 450,
451, fig. 193.

CYPRIPEDIUM CALLOSUM SANDERA@.—Journ. Hort., 1912, il. p. 565,
with fig. :

CyYPRIPEDIUM DEMETER.—Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 973, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM ELATIOR.—Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 913, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM HERA VAR. EuRYADES.—Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 968,
with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM X LaTona.—Gard. Chron., 1912, il. p. 402, fig. 174;
Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 940, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM VIKING.—Gard. Chron., 1912, il. p. 463, fig. 201.

LIssocHILUS ANDERSONII, RoLFE.—Bot. Mag., t. 8470.

OpontTIODA LATONA FOWLER’S VAR.—Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 960, with fig.

PHALZNOPSIS INTERMEDIA PORTEI.—Gard. Chron., 1912, ll. p. 455;
fig. 193.

SOPHRO-L#LIO-CATTLEYA THISBE.—Gard. Mag., 1912, p. 993, with fig.

VANDA C@RULEA Lapy HoLForp.—Journ. Hort., 1912, li. p. 513.

——-~— + —> +

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

{Orchids are named and questions answered here as far as possible. Correspondents are
requested to pe the n spe country or ~ entage of plants sent, An ADDRESSED postcard must be
cers if a reply by post is desired (abrinad ao postcards shoudl be used), Subjects of special interest

Il be dealt with in the body of the work

-B.—The fifteen parts of an sun flower are disposed in five whorls, three sepals;
three petals, one modified into a lip by the addition of two stamens from whorl 3 ; three
outer stamens, one being the ordinary stamen of the Monandre or the staminode of
Cypripedium ; ‘thr ee inner stamens, two forming the anthers of Cypripedium or the wings
or teeth of the column of the Monandrze , and the third usually modified into the crests of
the lip ; and three carpels, terminating above in the stigmas, one being modified into the
routeliioh: the other two ae separate or confluent.

H.C.A.— Lelia rubesc

: G.F.S.—Catasetum CErstedii, Rcehb. f., Central America. Pleurothallis peduncularis,
Lindl, Brazil.

Ae C.—Cymbidium Winnianum, a hybrid between C. giganteum and C. Mastersii.
The original record (C. giganteum x eburneum) is now known to be erroneous.

Photographs received, with thanks.—W.J.P., J.T.B.

_ Several notes are unavoidably postponed till next month,

re ORO Pee) CEN we,

VoL. XXI.] FEBRUARY, 1913. [No. 242.

OUR NOTE BOOK.
‘* A BANK of wondrous flowers crowned by sweeping sprays of dainty
blooms in every shade of white, yellow, mauve, lavender, blue; to the left
another range of colour centred by vivid scarlet in profusion; on every
side graceful artistic clumps of flowers soaring some twelve feet aloft ; long
ranges beyond in every shade of colour; some plants set amidst delicate
ferns, others relying for background on their own restful natural foliage.
The scene is the show of autumn-blooming Orchids connected with the
Royal Horticultural Society’s show at Westminster—a scene set amid a
group of fashionable folk talking on every subject under the sun, from
Orchids to hats and umbrellas. The show was one of the best of its class
to be seen in the world, and showed the wonderful advance of the hybrid,
which formed about two-thirds of the exhibition.”

This cutting, for which we are indebted to a friend, was taken from
Bladud, the Bath Society paper, for December 25th, and quite explains
itself. The writer then inquires. ‘‘ Why should more ladies not make the
cultivation of the Orchid their hobby or their serious occupation ? there
could be no more delightful task. The taste is a growing one, the fashion
of the flower makes conquests every day. The idea that extreme heat and
care are necessary is quite erroneous in many branches. The Odonto-
glossum, for instance, which figures here so large, only needs a Cool house
with an average temperature of 50°, plenty of fresh air, but no frost or fog.
The work, too, has none of the gritty side of gardening, the potting is
cleanly work, merely osmunda fibre and sphagnum moss. The reward is a
feast of colour in the home such as no other flower can yield. The hobby
is far more satisfactory than the present rage for the rock garden, and may
be taken up at far less outlay.”

The author was doing so well as a descriptive writer that it is a pity
am incursion was made into history. He remarks: “It was Julius Linden
who discovered the Orchid, and he is said to have nearly two hundred
classes of this plant, divided into something like twelve hundred different

41

42 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, I913-

kinds.” Perhaps he will look the facts up again in view of coming events.
There will be the Ghent Quinquennial Show in April, the R.H.S. Spring
Show at Chelsea in May, the Summer Show at Holland House in July,
and another Autumn Show in November. it is hoped that the latter
may become an annual event, for autumn-blooming Orchids are becoming
more numerous every year.

From a note on page 61 it will be seen that the Orchid Committee of
the R.H.S. has adopted a new rule with respect to disbudding, the effect
of which is that Certificates may be granted to disbudded Orchids when
the Committee is satisfied that the natural size and character of the flowers
have not been changed by the removal of buds or part of the spike. The
point will be difficult to prove, but the old rule was probably too stringent
in the case of seedlings flowering before the plants had reached their full
development.

A communication below calls attention to the recent discussion on the
Nomenclature of Hybrids, and the evident misconception that prevails as
to existing rules and their application. While dealing with the point
raised we received another communication, and in looking up some records
concerned we stumbled across a hybrid that was exhibited at Paris some
time ago under the name of Odontioda crispo-Neetzliana. We do not
know whether the name of Odontioda Bradshawie for this hybrid was
overlooked—its correctness is surely not called in question. A little earlier
we had a batch of five described novelties to look up, and found that every
one of them had already been named, fully recorded, and incorporated in
the Orchid Stud-Book. It is this sort of thing that makes one despair of
keeping intelligible records.

NOMENCLATURE OF ORCHIDS.

AN important point arises out of the ‘‘ Echoes of a recent discussion ”
(pp. 21-24). Those who read the discussion in the original in the Gardeners’
Chronicle will have noticed that there is the widest misconception, both as
to the object of nomenclature and the application of existing rules. And if
this is the case among those who ought to be the leaders of thought in this
matter, what can be expected of the rest of us who have to apply the rules
occasionally to our productions? It would be appropriate if a short note
illustrating the application of the rules could be published for our guidance.
At present we do not know where we are.—HysripIistT.

{We are in a state of almost hopeless confusion, and the greater part of
it arises from neglect of the rules, which are really very simple. One
cannot deal with the matter in a short note, but we may point out that

|
.
:

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 43

most of the difficulty centres round the specific name. The rule provides
that the specific name of a hybrid (as of a species) shall consist of a single
word, two short words being permissible when they can be joined by a
hyphen. Varietal names can then be added as necessary. The latter
are not limited to a single word, though here also short names are
recommended. Cattleya Jonesii is correct, but Cattleya John Jones (or
Mrs. John Jones) is not correct—at all events if applied to a primary hybrid.
Occasionally we get such names as Cattleya John Jones fulgens, which
is incorrect, and looks as if the varietal name had got in front of the specific.
Another point provided by the rules is that incorrect names are to be
rejected, dropped, or modified (the latter meaning put into correct form).
This rulehas been completely misunderstood, as we havealready seen. The
question of the name of generic hybrids, which also figured prominently in
the discussion, can be dealt with in a sentence. Such names as Zygo-Colax
and Sophro-Cattleya are not in accordance with the rules. They were
originally written Zygocolax and Sophrocattleya, which is the correct form.
The rules are perfectly explicit on these matters, and we appeal to
hybridists and recorders to adopt them.—Eb.].
WATER FOR ORCHIDS.

An American correspondent writes :—‘‘ We are using the water from the
Missouri River, and the City Authorities use chemicals for cleaning the
water. I saw the City Chemist, and was informed that while they use
alum and chloride of lime for the purifying process the water is not injurious
to Animal life. The water as we get it contains 200 parts of lime to
1,000,000 gallons, or 12 grains of lime to 1 gallon of water. I would ask if
this amount can hurt the Orchids? The Cypripediums seem to be doing
quite well, but all the epiphytes are not looking so well as two years ago
when less chemicals were used and the water was almost always dirty. I
have read your valued paper for several years but very little is said about
the water used for watering. Is it a general rule to use rain water
exclusively for Orchids? I shall thank you very much for some light on
this subject.”

[Rain or soft water is invariably recommended for Orchids, and in many
cases tanks are specially provided for storing the rain water collected from
the roofs. The hard water of some districts is distinctly injurious to
Orchids, and in such cases it is generally only used for damping down.
River water is seldom as hard as well water, and if the latter contains lime
it is injurious to epiphytal and humus-loving Orchids. We do not know
how far the purifying process mentioned will affect the value of the water
for Orchid culture, and should be glad to receive the experience of
our readers.—ED.]

44 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, I913-

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.

TuIs month is rather a trying one for beginners in Orchid culture, for we
experience much variability in respect of the weather, cold winds often
being accompanied by bright sun or damp, chilly days, and these following
each other in succession. Such climatic conditions render the matter of
ventilating rather difficult, and it is a point upon which no set rules can be
given, but must be left almost entirely to the good judgment of the amateur.
A few suggestions can only be given. Ventilate as soon as the thermometer
rises several degrees above 58° Fahr., and be careful to open only those
ventilators which are situated on the side of the house well away from the
prevailing wind. The main secret of success in growing Orchids is to
maintain a damp atmosphere at all times, and therefore do not open the
ventilators so widely as to cause all the moisture to evaporate from the
house. It is yet too early to begin any repotting, and watering should be
practised as advised in the article for last month.

Cypripediums will now be mostly over. These, without doubt, are the
Orchids par excellence for a small house, for they flower freely, remain a
long time in bloom, and small plants soon increase in size and make many
strong flowering growths. A good dozen, requiring 50° Fahr. as a
minimum, would comprise C. aureum, Boxallii, Calypso, Euryades,
Harrisianum, Leonia, Leeanum, nitens, Sallieri, Spicerianum, villosum,
and any variety of insigne. But there is now a long list to choose from,
and all the insigne hybrids will succeed under the treatment mentioned,
and they form the majority of the winter-flowering kinds.

WONDERS OF HEAT AND MOISTURE.
THE wonders of solar heat and moisture were recently discussed by Sir
James Dewar in a lecture at the Royal Institution. Speaking of the solar
radiation in tropical places, Sir James said that in six hours about four-
tenths of a square mile received heat equivalent to the combustion of 1000
tons of coal; while an area of 1300 square miles got in one year heat
equivalent to one billion tons of coal—the whole estimated coal output of
Europe and America. Between the months of April and July, a field of
wheat transpires sufficient moisture to cover the surface of its ground to a
depth of nine inches. Another interesting fact is that it requires 34]bs. of
water to produce 16 grains of corn. The famous vine at Hampton Court,
which has a leaf surface of 1820 square inches, gave off in twelve hours
two-fifths of a pound of water. It would be very interesting and instructive
_if the problem could be extended to cover the field of Orchid culture, im
which heat and moisture are such important factors.

So oe ae ee

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 45

THE ROMANCE OF ORCHID HUNTING.

AN “Orchid Collector” writes to the pages of Horticulture :—‘‘ Mr. P.
Harvey Middleton has written a very interesting article about Orchid Hunt-
ing in the American Homes and Gardens Magazine. The narrative is very
charming, but he has been so grossly misinformed that the whole thing
appears to be a ‘Fairy Tale.’ It isa very peculiar circumstance that very
few people can write about Orchid collecting without letting their wild
imaginations work wonders, which they spring on the man who later takes
those fibs as truths, and adorns them with his florid language. In the
article in question there is a reference to a typical example of the kind of
stuff that Orchid hunters are made of.

“He has been at death’s door with the fevers of the tropics and tropical
swamps, he has been robbed and deserted by his guides and left alone to
starve in Andean mountain forests, and has been attacked, tormented and
all but eaten by hundreds of big black ants. He has had to fight treacherous
guides for his life, and has had escapes too numerous to describe.

** It was while engaged in hunting Orchids in Colombia for the Philadel-
phia Orchid Queen that a revolution broke out. Barrault was seized by
Colombian soldiers and forced to fight for them. . . . Philosophically
accepting his fate he led a regiment of the Colombians to battle ane
fell severely wounded, and panic seized his followers who turned and fled.

** And so Barrault, the Orchid-hunting soldier, was thrown into prison
by the rebels and there left to get well as best he could. Slowly, but
surely, his fine constitution pulled him around, and one night about six
months later he floored his guard and got away. Two days and nights
brought him to the forest, where he knew rare Orchids were to be found.
Living on roots and herbs that former experience had taught him were
good for food, Barrault gradually worked his way through the forest until
he came to a lonely village off the track of the opposing armies. Here he
secured another set of guides and started off on the trail of a wonderful
snow-white Orchid which had been graphically described to him by a half-
naked Indian in the streets of Bogota—‘ An Orchid so big,’ said the native,
clasping hands and rounding arms, ‘and as white as snow on the mountain
tops. I will take you to it.’

‘* Barrault headed an expedition, that was fraught with many adventures,
to the mountain haunt of the marvellously big flower. Hardly had he started
before the first of them occurred. Barrault’s saddle girth broke as his mule
was stepping gingerly along a narrow mountain path at the edge of a two
thousand foot precipice, over which the Orchid hunter promptly disappeared.
He was caught in a tree growing out of the side one hundred feet below,
and after his guides, peering cautiously down the chasm, had recovered

_ 46 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, 1913-

from their dismay, a rope was lowered and he was hauled back to safety,
none the worse except for a few scratches.

‘They arrived without further mishap at their destination, two weeks
later, and were soon hard at work collecting the Orchids, which grew in
great profusion. Thenswamp fever struck the camp, and one after another
the guides fell ill, so that Barrault had to give up his beloved Orchids and
turn nurse. Then he, too, caught the fever, and was prostrated for days.
Some of the guides recovered before he did and, taking advantage of his
helpless condition, stripped him of his possessions, including the Orchids,
and left him alone in the forest. In his weakened state it took Barrault a
week to work his way out of the dense gloom of the forest, guided to some
extent by the almost overgrown path his expedition had hacked through
the undergrowth. But at last he reached a cluster of huts and rested for a
week. Then, with the determination of a man who never knows when
he is beaten, he set to work organising another expedition. ‘It was during
this trip,’ wrote Barrault, ‘ that with two guides I stumbled into an army
of big black ants. Before we could escape they swarmed all over us from
head to foot. It was half a mile to the nearest forest stream—a half mile
covered with dense undergrowth. Frantically we crawled our way to the
water, suffering agonies from the bites of the infuriated ants, and when,
after what seemed years, we reached the stream’s brink, we barely had
strength left to fling ourselves into the water.

‘* Barrault’s heart was still set on the possession of that beautiful snow-
white flower. He had the remnant of Mrs. Wilson’s gold in belts strapped to
his body, and the party had not proceeded far when half-a-dozen of his
redskin followers conspired to kill him in order to secure this or) which
he had been forced to show them in order to obtain their services.’

(Of course there was another fight, in which those who were not cones
were put to flight).

Another writer in the New York Herald tells moving stories about Mr.
Benson and his forty Indians, their journeyings, the desertion or death of his
followers, the impossiblity of climbing the trees on which the Orchids grew
because of poisonous green snakes hidden in the foliage, the overturning of
his canoe by alligators, which made off with one of the Indian guides, when,
of course, he got lost in the forest and wandered about for two days without

‘* The writer does not believe that either one of the collectors mentioned
told the stories as published. Some reporter let his mind wander and manu-
factured tales that went into print. If they ever heard these stories and
contradicted them is something that I do not know of. If the wonderful
exploits would refer only to green or blue snakes, tremendous precipices,
dense undergrowth, armies of black ants, swamp fevers, and pitched battles of

ge

LL we. a abe Mitapatne rian aie

FEBRUARY, 1913.} THE ORCHID REVIEW. 47

one hero against a lot of Indians, the stories would not be harmful, and,
except for their inaccuracy they would seem interesting. But when the
collectors wilfully and maliciously slander the natives as ‘thieves and
assassins’ it is time to put a stop to such talk.

‘‘In no country on the face of the earth is property more respected and
life more secure than in the countries where these collectors go. There
is as much danger of snakes and other animals there as there is in any place
in New Jersey and New York, and the climate where the commercial Orchids
grow and are collected is far better than any climate in the north and
simply delicious.

“it is peculiar that all the ‘ green collectors’ or the new starters are
the manufacturers of these wonderful stories. We have not seen men like
Lager, Bungeroth, Forget, and other collectors of their calibre tell stories
of the kind we have read as told above. .

“It is well for all to know that Orchid-collecting is not such a dangerous
undertaking; that heroes are not forced to take arms and fight the rebels
in any country, and that they only do it in dreams; that it is very seldom,
that a man can see a snake; that Orchids do not grow in the jungle or in
deleterious climates; that the natives do not rob the collectors in any way,
and that they are as honest as the collectors themselves. That no collectors
go into the forests to gather the plants except the natives; that the armies
of dangerous black ants are the products of feverish inagination, and that
the search for the ‘Snow-white Orchid,’ is nothing but one of the pretty
little fibs given to ignorant readers.

** T will take later on the description of Orchid-collecting as it is doner
and meanwhile I hope that the collectors will endeavour to give true
accounts of their experiences, and especially to be careful about slandering
the natives from whom they receive so many favours and who work so faith-
fully for them.—A CoLLEcrTor.”

meni
LAZLIOCATTLEYA AMARYLLOSO.
I sEND a couple of flowers from a Leeliocattleya seedling which h~s been in
my possession during the last three years and has just flowered.” Vattleya
Harrisoniana appears to have been one of the parents. The bulb that has
just flowered (three blooms) is about twelve inches long, and bears two
rather narrow leaves, about eight inches long. May I be allowed to
congratulate you upon the extremely interesting notes contained in the
Orchid Review. HENRY R. STERRETT.

** Elgin,” Alexandra Road, Heston-Hounslow.

[From the light yellow colour we believe it to be a form of L.-c.
Amarylloso (C. Harrisoniana X L. flava). The influence of the former is
unmistakable in the shape and undulation of the lip.—Ep.]

48 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (FEBRUARY, 1913.

EPIDENDRUM ENDRESII.
EPIDENDRUM Endresii, here represented, is one of the most charming little
Orchids imaginable, but, unfortunately, it has become very rare in
cultivation. It is a native of Costa Rica, and was discovered by Endres,
who, however, failed to send it home alive. Some few years after, the late
Consul F. C. Lehmann succeeded in transmitting a few living plants. It
was described by Reichenbach in 1883 (Gard Chron., 1883, i. p- 432), and
was afterwards figured in the Botanical Magazine (t. 7855). The stems are
about six to nine inches high, with verrucose sheaths, and the flowers are

Fig. 17. EprpENDRUM ENDRESII.

whitish Mp with a little purple on the lip and column. Very little is
known about its habitat, except that it is a mountain plant, and we suspect
that the loss of the plants, which a correspondent deplores, is due to their
having being grown in too much heat. Some time ago we saw it grown
with success at Harefield Hall in the Odontoglossum ‘house, and Mr.
Ashworth considers that this is the most suitable climate for it. Hybridised
with Epidendrum Wallisii it yielded the pretty little E. Veitchii, and this
is said to have been recrossed with E. Endresii by Messrs. Sander, yielding
a batch of seedlings showing remarkable variation, and. including forms
with purple, yellow, and spotted segments (O.R., Xiv., p. 181).

[FEBRUARY, 1913. THE ORCHID REVIEW. 49

THE ORCHID REVIEW.
I'HE accompanying illustration represents the twenty completed volumes of
the Orchid Review, with the companion volume, the Orchid Stud-Book, and is

reproduced from a photograph by Mr. F. W. Rolfe, of the Editor's working

WITH

ORCHID REVIEW,”’

=
4 aay
ym
“ve a
' io hat
} c -
mat >
3 : “ai
pe ae tle ea Sp}
3} ~
By ae
‘ pee
ae _
pes nA
+ _~
, —
- ms
os
>
Zz
-_
—
om
—"
c
CO
jer
OL
rhe
—_—

copy. Some of our readers have a similar set on their own library shelves,
and the figure will probably interest those who have welcomed the proposal
to prepare an index tothe work. It represents a library of Orchid literature,

extending back to the earliest-dtys-ofOrchid cultivation and hybridisation.

5° THE ORCHID REVIEW. (FEBRUARY, 1913+

ORCHID BREEDING.

As a hybridist who has worked on the principle of crossing plants with a
view to their improvement, it is rather disconcerting to be told that we have
been working on the wrong lines. We have not taken into consideration a
mysterious something called the ‘principles of genetics.’ We could
distinguish characters that we wished to perpetuate, to combine, or to
modify, but we failed to ascertain beforehand whether they were heritable
or not. The result is a crowd of failures, and it is even suggested that the
only safe method to adopt is to make a fresh start. A plant may be
homozygous for one character, heterozygous for another, and zerozygous
for a third character, and so on, but each individual plant has a definite
germinal, or gametic constitution, which can be ascertained by cross-
breeding it with other plants. In this way a factorial analysis of the plant
can be made. All future breeding from that plant is reduced to practically
a certainty. But how about the heritable characters of the other plant
with which it is crossed? A little earlier we had been told that it all
depended on whether the plant had a double dose of the desired character
or not. How am I to set about finding these heritable characters and
separating them from the undesirable characters that may also be heritable?
—Hypripist.

(In our opinion the whole argument is based upon a fallacy. Species are
homozygous, 1 all their characters, until crossed—that is to say they come
true from seed. They have a double dose ofall the characters, if the fact
must be stated in these terms. The trouble does not arise with the plant,
but with the hybridist, who mixes the characters, thus producing hybrids,
whose characters are necessarily heterozygous. The remark about a double
dose of a given character simply means that the said character is present
in both the parents, and like produces like. A plant that is homozygous
when crossed with another that possesses a similar character will be
heterozygous when crossed with one possessing a different character, but a
single character does not make a plant, and hybridists invariably work for
several characters at the same time. Suppose a yellow Cattleya is the
desideratum. That colour must be combined with, let us say, size, shape,
and constitution, if the hybrid is to be what has been termed a “ winner.”
“‘Genetics” is simply a convenient term for everything that concerns the
science of heredity, and hybridists have been studying it from the time that
the intermediate character of the first hybrid was observed. What
hybridists have to do is to keep their eyes open and conduct their
experiments according to their experiences and those of their fellow-workers.
They must continue to “‘ use the best individuals of the best varieties of the
best. species of the best genera ’—yes, andthe best hybrids, too, even if

DEL ABE ILE ED 3

Feprvuary, 1913 | THE ORCHID REVIEW. st

their Mendelian friends tell them that that is only the application of
genetics to Orchid breeding.—Ep.|
———+>-0<-
ORCHIDS: A GOLD MEDAL GROUP.

WE have received from Mr. Edward Clement, Maidstone, a photograph of
a fine group of Orchids which gained a Gold Medal at the Maidstone
Chrysanthemum and Flower Show held in November last, together with a
cutting from a local paper. Our readers will probably remember the very
interesting notes from Mr. Clement which appeared at pp. 8 and 43 of our
last volume. Mr. Clement writes: I have continued to persevere, and
early last spring put up another small greenhouse, to feet by 8 feet, quite a
home-made affair, but it seems to answer the purpose. My little collection
now numbers about 220 plants. We still have no gardener, and the work
is entirely done by my wife and myself; moreover it does not interfere with
my hours at business or my wife’s domestic duties. The newspaper cutting
is as follows :

“Mr. Clement’s exhibit of Orchids was one of the features of the show,.
forming a tastefully arranged bank at the market buildings end of the Corn
Exchange. To the ordinary observer Orchids are Orchids, but the true
Orchidist revels in classification, and to the initiated this beautiful bank of
blooms, peeping out from a setting of ferns and palms, as well as their own
foliage, resolved themselves into Cattleyas, Cattleya hybrids, Lzliocattleyas,.
Odontoglossums, Odontoglossum hybrids, Epidendrums, Cypripediums,
Cypripedium hybrids, Vandas, and Odontiodas. The group attracted much
interested attention, and the judges readily awarded it the Gold Medal.
The gem of the collection was the hybrid Cypripedium Baron Schréder,.
which was conspicuous for shape and beauty, and particularly for its rich,
dark colouring. Several of the “ baby’? Orchids were in flower for the
first time, the blooms never having been seen before in this country. To-
Mr. and Mrs. Clement, who had tended the plants with so much care and
attention, the greatest credit is due, and in this connection it may be
pointed out that Orchid-growing does not involve grave difficulties in
cultivation, the installation of expensive or elaborate equipment, or the
employment of a gardener with expert knowledge of the art. Mr. and
Mrs. Clement have raised their plants in quite ordinary glass houses,,.
unaided by costly apparatus. Constant care, intelligent application, and
enthusiasm have won for them the success they deserve.”

The photograph shows a very effective group and some well-grown
examples, which can be readily identified by the aid of alens. Mr. and.
Mrs. Clement must be congratulated on their success, and it should
encourage others who have commenced the delightful hobby of Orchid--
growing with inexpensive appliances.

52 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ FEBRUARY, 1913.

INTERESTING ORCHIDS AT KEW.

SEVERAL noteworthy Orchids are now flowering in the Kew collection.
Hemaria discolor is a beautifully sweet-scented Chinese species, having
dark velvety olive-green leaves and a dozen spikes of pure white flowers, with
a yellow blotch on the lip, forming a very pretty picture. Its culture is
not difficult. | Brassocattleya Lindleyana is an interesting Brazilian plant,
which is believed to be a natural hybrid between Brassavola tuberculata
and Cattleya intermedia, between which it is fairly intermediate. Gomesa
recurva is a rare Brazilian epiphyte, with a raceme of about twelve inches
long, and yellowish green flowers with undulate sepals and petals, and a
red marking on the column, which shows up rather distinctly.

Aérides Vandarum is a very distinct and interesting Orchid, although
not very floriferous. In habit it resembles Vanda Kimballiana, and the
flowers are white and borne on a short peduncle in the same way as
Vanda teres. This plant requires Cool house treatment. Dendrobium
amethystoglossum is an interesting, but not by any means a showy
Dendrobium. The flowers are borne in pendulous spikes, and the lip is
amethyst-coloured, with a rather long somewhat swollen spur. The
beautiful Miltonioda Ajax (M. Scheederiana x C. Neetzliana), is also in
bloom, the sepals and petals being crimson-red and the lip yellow.—L.

FRANK ASHTON RELIEF FuNp.—A small Committee of Orchidists has
been formed to assist Mr. Frank Ashton, who has unfortunately fallen into
indigent circumstances, and who is no longer able to follow his employ-
ment as a traveller in Orchids. He has been struggling against fate for the
past two or three years, but has at last been compelled to give up owing to
a very badly poisoned foot, to attacks of chronic rheumatism, and to an
affection of the eyes. He is no longer able to travel, and his resources are
practically at an end. An appeal is therefore made to all those who have
been associated with Mr. Ashton in the Orchid business to show their
practical sympathy with him in his great affliction by contributing towards
a Fund which will be utilized to establish him in some small home business.
The Kew Guild (of which Mr. Ashton is a life member) has generously
made a grant of £5 towards the Fund. The Committee consists of Messrs.
J. McNab, Sander & Sons, D. A. Cowanand A. G. Ellwood, of Charlesworth
& Co., and J. Weathers, Isleworth, but Mr. Harry Smith of Haywards
Heath, and Mr. Cooper of St. Albans, have also been consulted. Further
donations may be sent to the Secretary of the Kew Guild (Mr. Herbert
‘Cowley, South Side, Kew Green), or to me, and will be gratefully acknow-
ledged on Mr. Ashton’s behalf. John Weathers, 7, Talbot Road, Isleworth,
Middlesex, (Secretary).

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 53

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR FEBRUARY.
By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
WitH the present month the year’s work practically begins, and as we may
yet experience some severe weather, everything should be kept as quiet as
possible. Nothing will be gained by unduly. pushing anything into growth,
for such growth is puny and unsatisfactory. For all matters relating to
temperatures, watering, atmospheric conditions, and cultural hints
generally, last month’s remarks are still applicable. On bright days,
however, a slight increase in temperature by sun heat will be beneficial.

During the changeable weather sometimes experienced at this season
considerable attention must be given to the ventilation of the houses, as it
is essential that they should be constantly supplied with fresh air without
excessive fluctuations being permitted. During spells of clear frosty
weather the sun will have much power, and scorching may easily result if
the ventilation of the houses does not receive proper attention. The
plants will also take up more water, but this must be given with
discrimination, as it is much easier to make the compost too wet than it
is to get it dry again.

PoTTInG.—This important operation must now be taken into
consideration, and everything which can safely be taken in hand should
have attention, so that at a later season there may be no undue rush, or the
work may not be done as thoroughly as it should be. Thoroughness in
everything is the talisman of success.

Compost.—A supply of the various potting materials used should be
kept in stock, so that it may be in the desired condition-when required,
neither too wet nor too dry. The different fibres may be pulled or chopped
ready for use, so that when the busy season is upon us we may dispose of
the time at our disposal to the best advantage. If the different plants are
not repotted at their proper seasons they get an unnecessary check, which
may prove most harmful. Speaking of composts, I would advise that
drastic changes as regards this matter should be made with great caution,
as not only has the plant to take hold of the compost, but the watering is
quite different in many cases. A continual change of rooting material is a
source of trouble and much anxiety.

CaTTLEyas.—C. Trianz and C. Percivaliana, with any hybrids that
have flowered during the winter months, may be repotted if they are
pushing, or are about to push new roots. A suitable compost for the whole
family is made up as follows: Two parts osmunda and peat fibre, one part
At. fibre and sphagnum moss, all well mixed together. All the fine
particles must be carefully removed from the compost. If plants of
Cattleya Warneri, C. gigas, Lelia Boothiana, and L. crispa are in need of

54 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, I913-

‘new rooting material they may have attention, but the best season for
,potting these plants is immediately after blooming.

Mexican Laias that are in need of new compost should have attention
as soon as the new roots begin to push.

CYPRIPEDIUMS, as they pass out of flower, should be repotted if the
-compost is at all decomposed, or if the plants are in need of larger pots.
The compost given last month will answer their requirements.

DENnpRoBIUMS of the nobile section which are showing for flowers may
have water afforded them in more liberal quantities as soon as the flower
‘buds are about half developed. It is a good practice to thoroughly clean
-and overhaul these plants before the flower buds get any size, as there is
danger of many getting damaged in the operation. These plants open
‘their blooms quite satisfactorily in a temperature of about 60°. In a lower
temperature the flowers are stunted, and in a higher one they are forced
-out too quickly. Among present day growers these Orchids appear to have
lost favour, from what reason I am at a loss to understand, as, when in full
bloom, if well grown, there are few things to compare with them for effect.

CyMBIDIUMS, that are pushing up their young growths, and any others
‘that are in need of repotting, should be attended to when they are seen to
be pushing new roots from their base. They do not like disturbing, and if
the compost is not decomposed, and there is room for the new bulbs to
develop, it will be wise to defer this operation until next season, as they
bloom more freely when in a pot-bound condition. The species and hybrids
-of this useful genus delight in a cool position in the Intermediate house, but
must not be subjected to the direct rays of the sun at any time. Red spider,
which sometimes attacks the leaves, especially if grown in a dry position,
must be destroyed by sponging from time time with a weak solution of
insecticide. These plants will succeed in a similar compost to that used
for Cypripediums, and should be potted in the same way. Those that are
now pushing up their flower spikes may have attention at a later date.
They should have water afforded them whenever they become dry.

OncipiuMs of the winter-flowering varieties, as they commence to grow
and produce roots, may be repotted. It is essential to keep the rooting
material in a sweet and healthy condition, and if the compost is worn out
it is advisable to renew it. The compost used for Odontoglossums_ is
-suitable, and is made up as follows: peat, polypodium, and osmunda fibres,
and sphagnum moss in equal proportion, with a moderate quantity of leaves.
They are best grown in shallow pans suspended from the roof. Most of
‘these Oncidiums enjoy an Intermediate house temperature, but such species
as O. Papilio, Kramerianum, Lanceanum, and Cavendishianum do best in
the Warm house.

Mictonias.—Plants of Miltonia vexillaria, M. Bleuana, and M. Hyeana

FEBRUARY, I912.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 55

will now be growing freely, and those that are wel] rooted may have. water
afforded them whenever they become dry. They may also have more air
whenever the climatic conditions will allow of it with safety. Many of the
Brazilian Miltonias, as M. spectabilis and its variety Moreliana, M. Bluntii
Lubbersiana and others will now be developing new roots, and those in need
of new compost should have attention. It is important, in repotting, that the
young roots are not injured, as they are very tender and are easily broken.
They will succeed in the same compost as Oncidiums, and are best grown
at this season in the Intermediate house.

AERIDES AND SACCOLABIUMS.—Any plants of these genera, when show-
ing signs of renewed root action, may have attention as regards repotting
or resurfacing, should the moss be at all decomposed or in an unsatis-
factory condition. Aérides succeed grown in pots, while the smaller Sacco-
Jabiums are more satisfactory in shallow pans, or teak wood baskets,
suspended from the roof. The receptacles should be well drained, and clean
live sphagnum moss is the best rooting medium. The moss must be pressed
into the receptacles moderately firmly, as it is desirable that it should grow,
and when placed in loosely it often fails to do so. Plants that are not in
need of repotting may have the old material carefully removed from their
roots, and the new substituted. Such species as A. odoratum, Lobbii, virens,
Fieldiugii, Lawrencee#, and Sanderianum, with all the Saccolabiums, will
be best grown in the Warm house. A. Lindleyanum, A. crispum, A. crassi-
folium and A. Warneri delight in an intermediate temperature,

MASDEVALLIAsS that are in need of fresh material at the root, may
at this season have attention. Any of the stronger growing kinds,
such as M. Harryana, ignea, and any of the hybrids that did not
receive attention in the autumn may now be potted, should it be
requisite. These strong-growing plants are best grown in pots; the
‘smaller varieties in shallow pans, suspended well up to the light.
As a rooting medium I use for the strong growers a compost as follows:
equal parts peat, polypodium and osmunda fibres, and sphagnum moss,
‘with a fair quantity of half decayed leaves, and half a part of good
yellow loam fibre. For the smaller growers the latter is left out. M.
tovarensis, with others ofthe same nature, should be repotted at this season

just as they commence to grow. They should not be potted too firmly, as

their roots are not capable of pushing through hard masses of material.
‘These are best accommodated at the warm end of the Cool house at all
times.

CG@LOGYNE CRISTATA and its varieties are now pushing up their flower

‘spikes and must be afforded sufficient water to keep the pseudobulbs plump

and the roots healthy, or the flowers will be weak and puny, and their
flowering will be of short duration. They should not be forced too rapidly

56 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ FEBRUARY, 1913.

into bloom. After flowering they should receive a short rest, when they will
break into growth more vigorously.

ODONTOGLOssuUMS should have their flower spikes secured neatly to
stakes as they develop, as if allowed to lie upon the tops of the pots they
easily become a prey to slugs and other pests. Slugs at this season are
most destructive to the young tender flower spikes, and must be searched
for diligently and destroyed. O. grande and O. Insleayi are at rest, either
in the Mexican or the warm end of the Cool house, and will require little
water until growth has again become active.

SHADING.—Towards the end of the month it will be advisable to have all
the shading in proper working order, as such plants as Aérides, Phalznopsis,
Angrecums, Cypripediums, Zygopetalums, and many others are easily dis-
figured by the sun’s rays, and in some cases it takes a long time to get rid
of this disfigurement. — It is therefore advisable to have everything fixed and
in readiness in case of bright sunshine. Permanent shading on the glass is
harmful. Roller blinds are indispensable in Orchid culture if the best
results are to be attained.

GENERAL REMARKS.—A continual warfare must be waged against alb
pests, in fact against everything which interferes with our reaching the goal
ofour ambition. Keep the temperatures normal, give air on all favourable
occasions, and water whenever the plants require it. They will then follow
their normal course, resting, growing and flowering in their proper season,
and the careful and observant grower will soon come to understand their
requirements.

pena Mel Re teh
SOWING ODONTIODA SEEDS.

I HAVE ripened some Odontioda seeds, which I wish to sow. Should it be

sown immediately after ripening, or should one wait; if so how long ?

Also what is the best method of sowing ?—G.G.O.

The best plan is to sow part of the seeds at once and keep the remainder
till the weather is a little more genial, say about the end of March. The
seeds should be scattered thinly on the compost of Odontoglossums or
Odontiodas that will not require potting for some time, first removing any
sphagnum that is likely to overgrow the seedlings. There should be a
little leaf-mould on the compost. The warmest corner of the house should
be selected, and the seed beds should be shaded from direct sunshine, and
never be allowed to become dry. Great care should be exercised in
watering or dipping not to wash the seeds away, and it is best to keep the
surface moist by means of a sprayer. The seeds begin to germinate almost
at once, and under suitable treatment steadily progress until the first leaf
appears, when they can be pricked off in the usual way. The subsequent ~
treatment presents less difficulty.

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 57

LAZELIOCATTLEYA GLADIATOR.

LALIOCATTLEYA GLADIATOR.

THE annexed figure represents a fine specimen of Lzliocattleya Gladiator
(C. Mossiz x L.-c. callistoglossa), which was exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir
George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander), at the Royal

58 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, 1913.

International Horticultural Exhibition held at Chelsea in May last, and
received an Award of Merit (O.R., xx. p. 194). It is a very handsome
hybrid, the flowers being of excellent shape, and the sepals and petals deep
rosy lilac, while the broad undulate lip is well crisped, and the colour rich
crimson, with some yellow on each side of the throat and some darker lines
at the base. As will be seen by the figure, reproduced from a photograph
by Mr. F. Waldock, the plant bore ten flowers, and produced a fine effect.
Leliocattleya Gladiator is derived from Cattleya Mossie, C. Warscewiczil,
and Lelia purpurata, and one can hardly conceive a more promising
combination, the parent species being among the most popular of garden
Orchids.

ONCIDIUM CARDIOCHILUM.
A VERY interesting Oncidium was included in the group exhibited by
Messrs. Sander & Sons at the Royal Horticultural Hall, on November 5th
last. On comparison it proves to be O. cardiochilum, Lindl. (Fol. Orch.,
Oncid. p. 27), which was based upon wild specimens collected in New
Grenada by Purdie, and in Guatemala by Skinner, Lindley placed it in
his section Pentapetala macropetala, and described it as ‘“‘a fine species,
with a singularly entangled branching devaricating panicle. Flowers as
large as in O. rupestre or Odontoglossum hastilabium. The Guatemalan
form has a much thinner panicle, but does not seem to be different other-
wise.” The species does not appear to have been figured, and I can find no
evidence of its previously having been in cultivation. It has a large lax
branching very flexuose panicle, with numerous flowers about 14 inches
across. The sepals and petals are brown, and acuminate, and the lip
yellow, broad, and very deeply pandurate, with a rather elongated, some-
what tubercled crest, while the column wings are practically obsolete. It
agrees best with the New Grenadan form of the species—the one sketched
by Lindley on his Herbarium sheet, which may be regarded as the type of
the species. Messrs. Sander are not quite sure whence they obtained their
plant. R. A. ROLFE.
ARACHNANTHE MOSCHIFERA.—Under the title “‘ An Extraordinary Orchid”
the Strand Magazine for December illustrates a flower of this remarkable
species. The photograph was sent by Captain H. L. F. Vanger,
Weltevreden, Java, who remarks: ‘“ Although one would imagine this
to be a big spider or scorpion, it is a photograph (three-quarters of the real
size) of the flower of the Scorpion-Orchid—an Orchid that even here in
Java is not very common.’ We may add that the species is a native of
Java, Borneo, and the Malay Peninsula, and the name ‘‘ Scorpion Orchid’””
is said to he the one by which it is known to the natives.

fe: aT reat ate ee r Say as eee : e
is Sa ie eres ” = eee
ea si ae

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 59

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HorTICULTURAL.

A MEETING of the Committees was held on December 17th to adjudicate
upon plants submitted for Certificate, when many fine Orchids put in an
appearance, and the awards consisted of two First-class Certificates, eight
Awards of Merit, one Lindley Medal, and one Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair):
J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), de B. Crawshay, Gurney Wilson, Stuart Low, W.
Bolton, F. J. Hanbury, H. G. Alexander, A. Dye, A. McBean, T. Armstrong,
J. E. Shill, C. H. Curtis, J. Charlesworth, W. H. White, and Sir Harry J.
Veitch.

CYPRIPEDIUM DEMETER (G. F. Moore X Earl of Tankerville).—A very
fine hybrid, having the dorsal sepal white above the green base, with some
very large claret-purple blotches, and outside these a zone of smaller rose-
purple spots, while the broad petals and lip are light yellow, much suffused
with purple-brown. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V:O.,
Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

SOPHROCATLALIA THISBE (C. Iris x S.-l. heatonensis).—A brilliantly-
coloured hybrid, most like the Cattleya parent in shape, and the colour very
dark crimson, with a rather lighter throat. Exhibited by F. M. Ogilvie,
Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr. Balmforth).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CaTTLEya Tityus (Enid X Octave Doin).—A finely shaped flower, hav-
ing rosy sepals and petals, and a very broad, crisped-undulate, rosy crimson
lip, with a light yellow disc. Exhibited by H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn,
Putney (gr. Mr. Day).

CYPRIPEDIUM IprNa (insigne Harefield Hall var. xX Countess of
Carnarvon).-- A fine hybrid, most like the former parent, but the scape
dwarfer, and the dorsal sepal very short and broad, white, with a green
base and lines of purple dots. Exhibited by Messrs. James Veitch & Sons.

CYPRIPEDIUM SIR WILLIAM CHANCE (Thompsonianum X memoria
Jerninghamiz).—A very handsome hybrid, having a slightly concave, white
dorsai sepal, with a broad, somewhat branched band of claret-purple from
the base, and the petals and lip honey yellow, suffused with purple-brown,
the petals also bearing a dark central line. Exhibited by Francis Wellesley.
Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins).

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM var. J. Lakin (armainvillierense X crispum).
—A very handsome form, copiously blotched with reddish violet on a white
ground, and tinged with purple on the back of the segments. Exhibited
by Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford. ; :

ODONTOGLOSSUM JASPER FOWLER'S VAR. (crispum Victoria-Regina x

60 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, I913.

amabile).—A finely-shaped flower, having rosy sepals and petals blotched
with claret red, and the lip white with reddish blotches and a yellow crest.
Exhibited by J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr.
Davis).

ODONTOGLOSSUM SCINTILLANS ORCHID DENE VAR. (Rossii X
Wilckeanum).—A handsome form, having the petals white, blotched
with claret red below and tinged with rose above, the sepals covered
with dark blotches, and the lip dark rosy lilac, with a white disc and a
reddish blotch. Exhibited by Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford.

ONCIDIODA CINNABARINA (C. Neetzliana X O. monachicum).—A very
striking hybrid, having a long inflorescence, and cinnabar-red flowers, with
narrow stalked sepals and petals, and the apex of the lip white. Exhibited
by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath.

SOPHROCATTLEYA WESTFIELDIENSIS (C. labiata x S.-c. eximia).—A
charming thing, with bright rose-coloured sepals and petals, and a mauve
crimson lip. Exhibited by Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking
(gr. Mr. Hopkins).

SILVER LINDLEY MEDAL.

PHALENOPSIS INTERMEDIA PorTEI.—To Mr. A. Dye, gardener to the
Right Hon. Lord Rothschild, Tring Park, for a fine inflorescence with seven
branches and numerous flowers, being one of three produced by the original
plant, which has been at Tring for over thirty years.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION

DENDROCHILUM UNCATUM.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to
Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford, for a very fine specimen,
bearing sixty-eight of its graceful spikes.

OTHER EXuHIBITs.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent four
interesting hybrid Odontoglossums.

Lieut.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent Cypripedium Artemis (nitens x Fairrieanum), a light-
coloured and prettily spotted hybrid.

Sir Trevor Lawrence Bart., Burford, sent Cypripedium gattonense
(Tracyanum X Lowianum), and Eria Fletcheri, a dwarf species, with
roundish pseudobulbs, and cream-white flowers, borne singly on slender
woolly peduncles.

C. C. Moore, Esq., Hackensack, New Jersey, U.S.A., sent Cattleya A.
Dimmock, apparently a hybrid of C. Lawrenceana, having rose-coloured
sepals and petals, and a purple-crimson lip.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent
Cypripedium Delhi (insigne Harefield Hall var. x Earl of Tankerville), a
well-shaped and finely-spotted flower.

Vin Sal eran

FEBRUARY, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 61

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), sent Cypri-
pedium Mrs. Harry Bruce (Sallieri X Thompsonianum), which is described
on page 7 of our last issue.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, sent the pretty
Restrepia striata, and a good form of Oncidium hybridum.

Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent Cattleya Raphaeliz
Orchid Dene var., a very good form, having white sepals and petals, and a
rosy crimson lip, with numerous yellow veins on the disc.

Mr. H. Dixon, Spencer Park Nursery, Wandsworth, sent a plant of the
rare Oncidium Jamesonii.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, showed two very diverse
forms from a batch of hybrids between Lelia Iona and Cattleya Dowiana
aurea, one having pale yellow sepals and petals and a purple lip veined with
yellow, and the other rose-coloured with darker veining.

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, sent several hybrid Cypripediums.

DISBUDDING.

Considerable discussion having taken place with respect to a plant
certificated at the last meeting that infringed the Society’s rule against
disbudding, it was moved by Mr. de B. Crawshay, seconded by Mr. J.
O’Brien, and agreed, that Certificates be not recommended for any plants
the natural size and character of which have been, in the opinion of the
Committee, in any way changed by the removal of buds or parts of the
spike.

AT the meeting held on January 7th, 1913, there was a very fine display
of Orchids, and the awards consisted of one Gold and eleven other Medals,
one First-class Certificate, eight Awards of Merit, and one Certificate of
Appreciation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), and
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), W. H. White, W. Bolton, Gurney Wilson,
J. Wilson Potter, R. A. Rolfe, F. M. Ogilvie, G. F. Moore, F. J. Hanbury,
W. Cobb, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, J. E. Shill, H. G.
Alexander, A. Dye, R. Brooman White, C. J. Lucas, C. Cookson, de B.
Crawshay, W. P. Bound, A. McBean, T. Armstrong, C. H. Curtis, and Sir
Harry J. Veitch.

G. F. Moore, Esq., Bourton-on-the-Water (gr. Mr. Page), staged a
magnificent group, chiefly Cypripediums, of which about 250 fine specimens
were exhibited, in which C. insigne and its hybrids, including numerous

ms of Leeanum and Euryades were well represented, also a number of
€. Fairrieanum hybridsand others. The Society’s Gold Medal was awarded.

Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr: Mr. J. E.
Shill), staged a magnificent group of Lzlia anceps, including the varieties

62 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (FEBRUARY, 1913.

alba, in fine condition, Schrcedere, grandiflora, Sanderiana, Amesiana,
Crawshayana, Dorothy, and others (Silver-gilt Flora Medal).

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), received a Silver
Flora Medal for a fine group, including Odontoglossum armainvillierense
Ernestii, the handsome O. crispum Mrs. Goodson, and others, some
brilliant Odontiodas, Oncidioda Charlesworthii, and several Leliocattleyas
and Sophrocattleyas.

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), received a
Silver Banksian Medal for a good collection of Cypripediums, Odonto-
glossum Thompsonianum, crispum, loochristiense, and others, the rare
Miltonia Endresii, Cirrhopetalum appendiculatum, Lelia anceps, &c.

Sir Charles Haddon, Birkhamstead (gr. Mr. Hayler), was awarded a
Bronze Medal for a group of seven well-flowered specimens of Cypripedium
insigne.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
sent a magnificent plant of Odontioda Bradshawiz violacea, bearing a large
panicle of scarlet flowers, margined with light violet.

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent
good plants of Odontoglossum rosefieldiense and O. Vulcan.

F. J. Hanbury, Esq., Brockhurst, East Grinstead, sent Cypripedium
Lady Carlile (Troilus x Hera), a large and handsome flower.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O. (gr. Mr. Alexander), sent
a fine plant of Cattleya Miranda Holford’s var., Cypripedium Corsair
(Niobe X nitens), most like the former, C. Ulysses (Vandyke x G. F.
Moore), and a fine form of C. Rossetti.

The Hon. Rupert James, Richmond, Yorks, sent Cypripedium Lady
Evelyn James (Leeanum X aureum), a well-shaped flower.

W. R. Lee, Esq., Plumpton Hall, Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), sent
Cypripedium Lady Dillon (Mrs. Wm. Mostyn X nitens), a large and well-
coloured flower.

John S. Moss, Esq., Wintershill, Bishops Waltham (gr. Mr. Kench),
showed Odontoglossum Smithii, lighter in colour than the original form,
O. crispum Kenchii, a prettily spotted variety, and flowers of a few seedlings.

F. Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent Cypri-
pedium Actzus Westfield var., and C. memoria Mostynii, a pretty yellow
and white flower.

Lady Wernher, Luton Hoo (gr. Mr. Metcalfe), showed several plants of
Calanthe Vulcan, a bright rose-purple hybrid of the Veitchii group.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, received a Silver-
gilt Flora Medal for a very choice group, the centre being composed
of Lzliocattleya Ariel, Golden Oriole and allied hybrids, Lelia autumnalis,
many good Odontoglossums, some brilliant Odontiodas, and others, with

een anid

ee

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 63

examples of Masdevallia tovarensis and Oncidium cheirophorum in front.

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, received a Silver Banksian
Medal for a good group of Cypripediums, with varieties of Lelia anceps,
Calanthes, Brassocattleyas, Masdevallia Hincksiana, Schroederiana,
tovarensis, bockingensis, and others.

Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford, received a Silver Banksian
Medal for a good group of choice things, including plants of the brilliant
vermilion-scarlet Habenaria Roebelenii, Oncidium crispum with a nine-
branched panicle, the brilliant Odontioda keighleyensis, O. Bradshawiz,
and a few good Odontoglossums and Cyp ripediums.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, received a Silver Banksian
Medal for a showy group, containing plants of Phala nopsis Schilleriana
and Aphrodite, Dendrobium Phalznopsis and Wardianum, Ansellia humilis,
Oncidium splendidum, Angraecum sesquipedale, Vanda ccerulea var. albo-
coerulea, white with a blue lip, the rare Zygopetalum M urrayanum, and a
few showy Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas, and Cypripediums.

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, received a Silver Banksian
Medal for a choice group, consisting of some well-grown Odontoglossum
crispum and blotched hybrids, Lelia anceps and Gouldiana, Cymbidium
insigne and Wiganianum, Odontioda Bradshawiz, Miltonia St.-Andre,
Brassocattleya Leemanniz, and others.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, received a Silver Banksian Medal
for a good group, including Leeliocattleya Amarylloso, Walter Gott,
Pauline, a pretty yellow hybrid, Miltonia Bleuana gloriosa, a very beautiful
form, a well-flowered Epidendrum polybulbon, Cypripedium Minos Youngii,
C. Troilus Sander, and some good Odontiodas and Odontoglossums.

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, received a Silver Banksian Medal
for a good group, including Miltonia Warscewiczii, Cattleya Ianthe, Brasso-
cattleya Maronia, a pretty little Dialelia from Diacrium bicornutum and
Lelia purpurata, Cypripedium insigne Sandere, Idina, Acteus langleyense,
and a few others.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

ODONTOGLOssUM PESCATOREI SANDER#&.—A very distinct and striking
form, having flowers of good shape, and the inner parts of the segments
spotted with cinnamon-brown. The plant bore a large branched panicle
of flowers. Exhibited by Baron Bruno Schréder.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CYCNOCHES CoopeRI.—A Peruvian species, nearly allied to C.
pentadactylon, but having the sepals and petals of a nearly uniform
mahogany brown. The plant bore two fine racemes. Exhibited by
Messrs. Sander & Sons.

CypRIPEDIUM ALciNipA (Alcibiades X insigne Harefield Hall var.).—A

64 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, 1913.

fine thing, having a broad white dorsal sepal with apple-green base and
some purple spotted lines, and well-shaped brownish petals and lip.
Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

CypRIPEDIUM AMAZON (Leeanum Corona X nitens).—A finely-shaped
flower, with the broad dorsal sepal green below and white above, and the
petals and lip also broad. Exhibited by F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The
Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr. Balmforth).

CyprRIPEDIUM Iona (bellatulum x Fairrieanum).—A very distinct and
charming flower, most like the former in shape, and beautifully veined
throughout with claret-purple. The leaves are very prettily mottled.
Exhibited by His Grace the Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace,
Woodstock (gr. Mr. Hunter).

HaBENARIA ROEBELENII.—A brilliant ally of H. militaris, having the
flowers vermilion-scarlet throughout. It was described at page 39 of our
last issue. Exhibited by Mr. E. H. Davidson, Orchid Dene, Twyford.

L&LIA ANCEPS ROEBLINGIANA.—A remarkable variety, the flowers being
rather small and very richly-coloured, and the petals veined with purple,
and with the trace of a crest in the centre. Exhibited by C. G. Roebling,
Esq., Trenton, New Jersey, U.S.A.

ODONTOGLOSSUM GEORGE Day (Rossii rubescens X crispum).—A very
pretty hybrid, having the sepals and petals spotted with claret on a lilac
ground, and the front of the lip lilac-rose. Exhibited by H. S. Goodson,
Esq., Putney (gr. Mr. Day).

ODONTONIA FirMINu (M. vexillaria X O. crispum).—A striking hybrid,
quite intermediate in character, and having white flowers, with an ample
lip, and a brownish rose marking in front of the yellow crest. A second
plant had rather smaller flowers, and the spotting on the lip rather more
vidas -Exhibited by M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels.

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION.

ADIODA ST.-FusciEN (Ada aurantiaca Xx Cochlioda Noetzliana).—A
form with dark scarlet flowers, rather more open than in the Ada parent.
Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

At the meeting held on January 21st there was again a good display of
Orchids, and the awards consisted of seven medals, one. First-class
Certificate, and five Awards of Merit.

Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair), Messrs.
J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), de B. Crawshay, J. Wilson Potter; Gurney Wilson,
R. G. Thwaites, F. J.. Hanbury, R. A. Rolfe, A. McBean, C. H. Curtis;
J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, J. E. Shill, H. G. Alexander, W. P. Bound,
A. Dye, W. H. — spel Low,. W.~ Bolton, J. S: Mises: and. T.
Armstrong. —

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 65

Lady Wernher, Luton Hoo (gr. Mr. Metcalfe), staged a group of well-
grown and flowered Calanthe Regnieri, with a few plants of C. Baron
Schréder, one of the latter having an inflorescence four feet high, with three
side branches. A Silver Flora Medal was deservedly awarded.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
staged a most interesting group of rare things, including the striking
Cirrhopetalum robustum, Zygocolax Wiganianus, and Z. Veitchii Kromeri,
Zygopetalum rostratum, a fine plant of Restrepia striata, the rare
Masdevallia elephanticeps and a well-flowered M. tovarensis, Sarcopodium
triflorum, Eria globifera, Pleurothallis scapha, Oncidium dichromum,
Cynorchis compacta, Tainia penangiana, Cypripedium Lady Colman, and
Lycaste lasioglossa.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), showed Cypripedium Jura (insigne Harefield Hall var. x Mrs.
Wm. Mostyn), a large and well-shaped flower, having a broad white dorsal
sepal with lines of large purple spots, and well-coloured petals and lip.

C. J. Lucas, Esq., Warnham Court, Horsham (gr. Mr. Duncan), showed
Cypripedium George Branch (Lathamianum X Boxallii), a large and well-
coloured flower, most like the latter.

C. J. Phillips, Esq., The Glebe, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Bucknell), sent
Odontioda Euterpe Glebe var., with deep red sepals and petals and a
bright rose lip, and O. Joan (Odontioda Charlesworthii x Odontoglossum
armainvillierense), having claret-red flowers with a few white markings.

Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. ge.
Shill), showed a fine plant of Lelia anceps Hilliana rosefieldiensis, bearing
three fine spikes and eleven white flowers, with a very broad rose-coloured
front lobe to the lip.

J. Brisdon Seatle, Esq., Fairfield, Putney (gr. Mr. Price), showed
Odontoglossum crispum Rossendale, with a fine branched panicle, and a
blotched seedling.

F. Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent a good
plant of Cypripedium Cupid magnificum, having cream white flowers
tinged and spotted with purple, C. Morningtoniz (F. Sander x nitens)
with a well-spotted dorsal sepal, and Brassocattleya Wellesleyz ( B. glauca
x C. Mossize Wageneri), a very pretty white flower.

Messrs. Charlisworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including the handsome Zygopetalum Roeblingianum, the pretty white,
Dendrobium Ashworthiz, a fine plant of Catasetum discolor, Lycaste
lanipes, Trichopilia Gouldii, a fine Odontioda keighleyensis, Odontoglossum
Insleayi, and some good forms of O. armainvillierense, Wilckeanum, and
others, Vanda Amesiana, Sophrocatlalia Electryon (L.-c. Gottoiama x S.-1.
Felicia), having nankeen yellow sepals and petals, with a dark purple lip,

66° THE ORCHID REVIEW. (FEBRUARY, 1913.

Cypripedium Queen of Italy, a pretty hybrid between C. glaucophyllum
and C. Fairrieanum, with a richly-coloured dorsal sepal and drooping
petals, and other good things (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a fine group,
including forms of Lelia anceps, Miltonia. Bleuana and Hyeana, Calanthe
bella, Bryan, and William Murray, Brassocattleya Maronii, Sophronitis
grandiflora, Ada aurantiaca, Odontoglossums, and a lot of choice Cypri-
pediums (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a showy group,
including some good Dendrobium Phalznopsis and Wardianum, Oncidium
pulvinatum and tigrinum, Cattleya Loddigesii and Percivaliana, Sophronitis
grandiflora, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including plants
of Phalznopsis amabilis Rimestadiana, Pleurothallis Roezlii, a well-flowered
Epidendrum polybulbon, a number of good Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas
and Odontoglossums, Dendrobium epidendropsis and Brymerianum,
Trichopilia laxa, Saccolabium violaceum Harrisonianum and S. bellinum,
and some good Cypripediums, noteworthy among them being C. insigne
Louis Sander (i. Harefield Hall var. x i. McNabianum), having a very
broad white and well-spotted dorsal sepal (Silver Flora Medal). ~

Messrs. Hassali & Co., Southgate, staged a small group of Odonto-.
glossums, including good forms of O. amabile, armainvillierense and others,
also a few good Cypripediums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, staged a very varied group of Cattleya
Trianz, Phalzenopsis casta, and Cypripedium insigne Lager, having the
dorsal sepal suffused with brown (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. E. H. Davidson, Borlases, Twyford, sent a fine example of
Odontoglossum illustrissimum, a very richly-coloured Odontioda Brad-
shawiz, and others.

Mr. S. Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham, sent a fine plant of
Odontoglossum Phoebe magnificum, a pretty O. Rossianz, anda fine form
of Cypripedium Simonii (insigne Harefield Hall var. x Leeanum Clinka-
berryanum).

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

CATTLEYA ENID var. F. LAMBEAU (Mossiz Reineckeana x Warscewiczii
Frau Melanie Beyrodt).—A very large and beautiful form, having broad
pure white sepals and petals, and the front of the lip mottled with bright
purple in front of the light yellow disc. Exhibited by M. Firmin Lambeau,
Brussels (gr. M. Demunter).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CG@LOGYNE INTERMEDIA (cristata Lemoniana Xx Massangeana).—A

graceful hybrid, closely resembling C. flaccida in habit, but the flowers, which

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 67

are borne in short arching racemes, somewhat larger, with white, rather
undulate sepals and petals, and the disc of the lip orange yellow, with three
strongly crested keels. Exhibited by Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons.

LLIOCATTLEYA FIRMINII VAR. ARDENS (L.-c. Ceres X C. Dowiana
aurea).—A handsome form, having copper-red sepals and petals with some
lighter shading, and a dark ruby crimson lip with an orange yellow throat.
Exhibited by M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels.

ODONTIODA MADELINE VAR. PRINCE OF ORANGE (Odontioda Charles-
worthit X Odontoglossum crispum).—Remarkable for having lost the
crimson ground-colour of the former. The flower is of good shape, the
sepals and petals light buff yellow, with some light brown markings, and
the lip very broad. Exhibited by C. J. Phillips, Esq., Sevenoaks.

ODONTOGLossUM AIREWORTH Goopson’s VAR. (Lambeauianum xX
crispum).—A very pretty form, having the sepals and petals lilac, heavily
spotted with brown. Exhibited by H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney
(gr. Mr. Day).

SOPHROCATTLEYA SAXA ORCHID DENE var. (S. grandiflora x C. Trianz).
—A large and handsome form, having broad sepals and petals of a clear
rosy crimson, with some yellow in the throat. Exhibited by Mr. E. H.
Davidson, Twyford.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.
A MEETING was held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on January 2nd,
1913, when the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Cromble-
holme (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, J. Cypher, A. Hanmer, F. A.
Hindley, D. McLeod, C. Parker, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward, A. Warburton,
and H. Arthur (Secretary).

Large Silver Medals were awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden
(gr. Mr. Weatherby); R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden) ;
A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), and Col. J
Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), for fine miscellaneous
groups, and to Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, for a group of
choice Cypripediums.

A Silver Medal was awarded to F. A. Hindley, Esq., Bradford, for a
good group of Cypripediums, Odontoglossums, and Trichopilia suavis.

Bronze Medals were awarded to Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), and H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn, for good groups
of Cypripediums, the latter also containing Cymbidium Holmesii.

Interesting exhibits were also contributed by J. J. Holden, Esq.,
Southport (gr. Mr. Johnson); W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr.
Branch); Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, and Messrs. Keeling & Sons,
Bradford. af

68 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, 1913.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.
Odontoglossum J. Whitmoyer, a large flower of the amabile type, and
well spotted. From Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Cypripedium Lady Dillon magnificum (nitens Ball’s var. x Mrs. Wm.
Mostyn), a large, well-balanced and spotted flower. From W. R. Lee, Esq.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Mrs. F. Sander (Eve X insigne Sander). From J. J.
Holden, Esq.

Cypripedium Rossendale (parentage unknown. From R. Ashworth, Esq.

Vanda Amesiana albens. From Messrs. Stuart Low & Co.

Oncidium crispum var. The Knowle, and Gomeza Barkeri. From
Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

AWARDS OF APPRECIATION.
Lycaste Skinneri var. Her Majesty. From J. J. Holden, Esq.
Cypripedium insigne var. International. From H. Arthur, Esq.
CULTURAL CERTIFICATE.

To Mr, Dalgleish, for fine examples of Cypripedium Leeanum giganteum

and C. L. nobilior.

At the meeting held on Thursday, January 16th, 1913, the members of
Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs
J. Bamber, J. Cypher, J. Evans, W. Hatcher, A. J. Keeling, J. Lupton,
D. McLeod, W. Morgan, C. Parker, F. K. Sander, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward,
A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr.
Mr. Weatherby), for a splendid group of Cypripediums, Odontoglossums,
and Odontioda Cecilia.

A large Silver Medal was awarded to A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
(gr. Mr. Dalgleish), for a group composed principally of choice Cypri-
pediums, Odontoglossums, and Cattleyas.

Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr
Mr. Lupton), and Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, for good mis-
cellaneous groups.

A Bronze Medal was awarded to Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a small group of Cypripediums.

Interesting exhibits were shown by H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn; H. J.
Bromielow, Esq., Rainhill (gr. Mr. Morgan); S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley
Range (gr. Mr. Brown) ; R. le Doux, Esq., West Derby (gr. Mr. Fletcher);
W. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange (gr. Mr. Howes); O. O. Wrigley,
Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), who staged the fine Dendrobium Schuetzei;
Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford; Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield,
and Mr. W. Shackleton, Great Horton.

FEBRUARY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 69

FiIrsT-CLass CERTIFICATES.

Odontoglossum amabile var. excelsum, a large, well-shaped flower,
with undulate segments, evenly blotched with plum-coloured markings.
From Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Cypripedium Princess Patricia of Connaught (Alcibiades X_ nitens),
showing the best features of Alcibiades but more compact, with deeply
coloured spots on a round well-set dorsal. From S. Gratrix, Esq.

Cypripedium x Carola (Thompsonii xX Euryades splendens), a large
flower, of good shape and substance, having a white dorsal sepal with claret
red markings, and broad petals of villosum colour and shape. From Wm.
Thompson, Esq.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Odontoglossum James Barclay, O. Violina Henderson, O. Lord Pirrie,
and O. R. le Doux, all of unknown parentage. From R. le Doux, Esq.

Cypripedium Snowdon Range (Euryades Sir Trevor Lawrence’s var. X
Leeanum). From S. Gratrix, Esq.

Cypripedium waltonense var. W. Stevens (Thompsonianum x Rupert).
From Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Odontoglossum Harryano-crispum Ne Plus Ultra. From Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Brassocatlelia Cooksonii (B.-l. Gratrixie x C. Dowiana aurea).
From Col. J. Rutherford.

CULTURAL CERTIFICATE.

To Mr. Morgan, gardener to H. J. Bromielow, Esq., for a fine plant of

Cypripedium Minos Youngii.

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

SEVERAL interesting flowers are sent from the collection of J. J. Neale,
Esq., Penarth, by Mr. Haddon, including a fine panicle of Seraphyta
multiflora, which is one of five borne by the plant, producing a very
graceful effect. There are fine inflorescences of Dendrobium Dearei and
Phalznopsis, which have done very well this season, a fine Cycnoches
chlorochilon, Phalznopsis Esmeralda, Cypripedium insigne Ernestii and
Harefield Hall var., with C. Rossetti and C. Arthurianum, Cattleya Portia,
Lzliocattleya Issy, and a promising hybrid from L.-c. Clive x C.
Warneri, with bright rose-coloured flowers of good shape, Stenoglottis
longifolia, and, among the more botanical kinds, Liparis longipes,
Bulbophyllum crassipes and Careyanum, Bifrenaria racemosa, Masdevallia
muscosa, triangularis, amabilis and Schreederiana, forming a very pretty
little group.

A fine form of Cypripedium Romulus is sent from the collection of
O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), who remarks
that it was raised in the collection and is now flowering for the first time.

70 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (FEBRUARY, 1913.

It has a broad white dorsal sepal, with a green base and some purple
blotches. It was sent as a form of C. Troilus (a hybrid derived from
C. nitens and C. insigne), for which C. Romulus is a much earlier name.

We have received from Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Langley, two
forms of an interesting hybrid from Cypripedium Thalia crossed with the
pollen of C. Fairrieanum ; also a flower of the seed bearer for comparison.
C. Thalia is partly derived from C. Fairrieanum, and the seedlings show a
marked return to the character of the latter species. The dorsal sepal is
copiously blotched, and one formis much darker than the other. The
seedlings are from the same capsule, and are now flowering for the first
time. They should develop into fine things when the plants become stronger.

THE ORCHID EMBRYO-SAC,
AN important paper on the Orchid Embryo-sac, by Lester W. Sharp,
appears in the November issue of the Botanical Gazette (liv. pp. 372-385,
tt. 21-23). During the spring of 1910 the author visited Jamaica, with a
party of botanists, and took the opportunity of studying the embryo-sac of
a number of Orchids, and these were supplemented by observations on a
few other cultivated species.

Orchids, remarks the author, standing at the end of a great evolutionary
line, the Monocotyledons, and reaching extreme specialisation in other
features, may be expected to show instructive deviations from the usual
type of embryo-sac, and it is through a study of such deviations that a final
explanation of the origin and nature of the angiosperm embryo-sac will
probably be reached.

The species studied were Epidendrum variegatum, E. verrucosum,
E. cochleatum, E. globosum, Phaius grandifolius, Corallorhiza maculata,
Broughtonia sanguinea, Bletia Shepherdii, Ccelogyne Massangeana, and
Pogonia macrophylla. Details showing the course of development of the
embryo-sac from the megaspore mother cell in the different species are
given, but are difficult to summarise apart from the series of fifty-five
figures with which the paper is illustrated. A point of interest brought out
is the variability within the species, involving a reduction of the number
of divisions occurring between the megaspore and the egg. When a single
megaspore produces the 8-nucleolate sac there are three such divisions;
when a similar sac arises from a daughter cell, two megaspores thus taking
part in the process, there are two divisions; and when the megaspore
mother cell gives rise to the sac directly, four megaspores are involved and
the egg is separated from the megaspore by but one division. It was hoped

“to discover among these advanced angiosperms a situation parallelling that
in animals, in which the product of the reduction divisions at once becomes
the egg.

(See et Oe ry eS sy

2 ie tS see NE a)

pose Ces

LS ee OO

FEBRUARY, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 71

As is well known, the ovules of’ Orchids do not develop. far unless pol-
lination has occurred. in most of the species here reported the pollen tubes
are found growing among the ovules before the prophases of the reduction
division in the megaspore mother cell, in one or two species they are not
present before the embryo sacs reach the 2- or 4-nucleate stage. In recipro-
cal crosses between Phaius grandifolius and Bletia Shepherdii it was found
that in both cases the pollen tubes develop in great numbers and grow down
the ovarial cavity, in which ovules develop and produce embryo-sacs in
smaller numbers, but in the same manner as after normal pollination. ‘In
no case, however, was fertilisation or an embryo seen resulting from crosses
between these two species. Thus the stimulus necessary to the develop-
ment of ovules with embryo-sacs may be furnished by foreign pollen incap-
able of effecting fertilisation.

In all the species in which fertilisation was observed it is of the usual
type; one of the two male nuclei fuses with the egg nucleus, while the other
fuses with the two polars. Also in all the species examined the endosperm
nucleus disorganises without dividing, thus accounting for the elimination
of endosperm from the Orchid seed.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Westminster, during February, on the 4th and
18th, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour, 12 o’clock
noon. The following meeting will be held on March 4th.

The Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will hold
meetings at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on February 6th and 2oth.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection
from I to 4 p.m. The following meeting is fixed for March 6th.

We learn that the Monton Grange collection of Orchids, formed by
G. H. Peace, Esq., is being dispersed. The collection is well known in
the Manchester district, and we believe contains many choice varieties. A

notice appears in our Advertisement columns.

CaTTLEYA ABEKENIZ.—M. Gust. H. Miiller Abeken, Lange Voorhout,
Den Haag, informs us that a seedling of exceptional beauty has flowered in
his collection. It is a cross. between Cattleya Rothschildiana and C.
Dowiana Rosita. It is most like a fine C. Rothschildiana in shape, but has
yellow sepals and petals, and the lip is intermediate in character, with a
rose-coloured margin. He cannot trace any record of this cross, and wishes ~
tt to be recorded under the name of Cattleya Abekenia. C. Rothschildiana
is a hybrid from C. Gaskelliana and C. Dowiana.

72 ‘THE ORCHID REVIEW. [FEBRUARY, 1913:

C@LOGYNE INTERMEDIA.—We have received from Messrs. James
Cypher and Sons, Cheltenham, a flower of Ccelogyne intermedia (C.
cristata Lemoniana X Massangeana), which received an Award of Merit
from the R.H.S., on January 21st last. It is a charming little plant,
having short arching racemes of flowers, somewhat resembling an enlarged
C. flaccida, the colour being white, with an orange yellow disc to the lip
and three strongly crested keels. The white colour raises a difficulty
about C. Massangeana, but Mr. Cypher states that only the pollen of
C. Massangeana and C. oculata were used and the capsule from the
latter did not mature.

—_s

THe New CattLeya Houser at Kew.—A new Cattleya house has
been erected at Kew, which should prove a valuable acquisition, as none of
the earlier houses were specially adapted for Cattleya culture, and
the space available was limited. It stands to the north of the existing
range, and its erection necessitated the removal of several trees.
The grass bank and chains clothed with Ivy, which form the
boundary of the terrace on which the range is built, have been extended
along the front of the new house. The dimensions of the structure are:
Length 46 feet 9 inches, width 20 feet, height to eaves 6 feet 6 inches, to
top of ridge 13 feet. The sides and central benches in the house are of
teak. The principal rafters are iron and the woodwoik deal. Heywood’s
patent system is used in the glazing. The house is now furnished and its
utility is likely to be well tested during the coming season.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

ANGR&CUM SESQUIPEDALE.—Garden, 1913, p. 7, with fig.

CaTTLEYA Fapia.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 3, with fig.

C@LOGYNE INTERMEDIA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 57, with fig. (called
** C. cristata’ by mistake).

CYPRIPEDIUM DEMETER.— Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 3, lig. I.

CyPRIPEDIUM IonA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 43, with fig.

ODONTONIA FIRMINII.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 21, with fig.

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

rchids ave named and questions answered here as far as possible. Correspondents aré
sasted to et e the native country or parentage of plants sent. An ADDRESSKD postcard must be
pins ‘if a reply by post is desired oteeet a postcards should be used), Subjects of special interest
will be dealt with in the body of th
F. J. Le M.—Brassavola “satan iu ndl,
- C. M.—Thanks for note, which shall appear next month.

- B.—The rusty markings on the base of the Cypripedium leaves are caused b
thrip, probably when the leaves were young. Fumigate if the insects are still present, oF
sponge with insecticide if the attack is only local.

W. B.—Received with thanks. Next month.

a
a
.

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

VoL: XXI.] aber 3 MARCH, 1913. (No. 243.

OUR NOTE BOOK.
‘“ AN, ATROCITY.—-The daily papers give accounts of the destruction of
many valuable Orchids at the Royal Gardens, Kew, England, by the
militant suffragettes.. It is very difficult to convince one’s self that members
of the fair sex, of good breeding and refined associations, could ever be
guilty of such an atrocious act of savagery.

‘O woman! lovely woman! Nature made thee to temper man; we
had been brutes without.’

Thus sang the poet over two hundred years ago. Is it possible that the
time is coming when the sentiment will have to be reversed? We are
sorry for Kew, for, in a way, its loss is the loss of the entire horticultural
world. We are sorry for the misguided marauders who imagine they can
help their cause by venting their fury upon the flowers!”

The above is from the issue of Horticulture for February 15th, which
has just reached us, and we cannot improve upon it. The outrage was
committed during the early hours of February 8th, and was discovered by
the night stoker about four a.m., and he at once called the policeman who
was on night duty, who summoned the foreman and the Curator. A lot of
glass had been smashed, and the plants thrown about in all directions, and
some of them broken to pieces, or the leaves and a large number of spikes
torn off. The latter would be more easily seen in the dark. A few plants were
practically ruined, and many badly damaged, these including Odonto-
glossums, Phalzenopsis, Dendrobiums, Cymbidiums, Ccelogynes, Lycastes,
Cattleyas, Cypripediums, and Epidendrum Wallisii. The Ancectochili—a
good collection—were broken into fragments, perhaps considered specially
valuable because placed under bell glasses. It was estimated that 136
piants suffered in various ways. The damage is estimated at about £150,
including some £4 worth of glass. The marauders obtained entrance by
smashing a pane in the door of the insectivorous house and climbing
through, whence they passed into the main range of Orchid houses. They
ultimately got clean away, leaving a card—on which was written *‘ Votes
for Women”’—a bag containing some iron bolts, and two blood-stained

73

74 THE ORCHID REVIEW. {MaRCH, 1913.

handkerchiefs, the latter showing that they did not escape scot free from
the encounter. The weather favoured the raid, being very rough, with
heavy rain. Fortunately, there was no frost, and mats were at once
requisitioned and the glass quickly replaced, so that the damage under this
head was not serious. A fine collection of Orchids just presented by Sir
George Holford was in the new Cattleya house and thus escaped, with the
exception of a few Cypripediums that were in bloom in the Show houses, of
which a few leaves and flowers suffered.

It is suspected that the marauders obtained access through the adjoining
Mid-Surrey Golf Grounds in the Old Deer Park; at all events a week
later the putting greensthere were badly damaged. In the early morning of
February 2oth the Tea Kiosk near the Temperate house was discovered to
be in flames by the night stoker, who, by the light of the illumination, saw
two women hurrying away. He blew a policeman’s whistle, and constables
took up the chase and arrested two women when hurrying across the golf
grounds. Two fire brigades were quickly on the scene, but too late to save the
building, which was practically reduced to a heap of ashes. The damage
is estimated at about £1000. Whether there is any connection between
these outrages or not remains to be seen. At the subsequent police-court
proceedings the women were remanded for a week, bail being refused, in
consequence of which it is reported that a book and some papers were flung
at the chairman of the bench of magistrates.

We have just had a correspondence respecting the number of unflowered
seedlings that are being sold without record of parentage, or with records
that seem incredible or impossible when the seedlings flower. A
correspondent has been particularly unfortunate in this respect, but it is
difficult to suggest a remedy. Another phase of the same difficulty has just
confronted us. Flowers of a number of seedling Odontoglossums that were
obtained at a Sale were submitted for determination, with the Sale numbers.
We suggested that the Sale Catalogue might contain the missing records,
but this proved not to be the case. At these Sales a few numbers are reserved
for plants in flower that may be brought in on the morning of the Sale, and
in the case of seedlings flowering for the first time they are sometimes sold
without any record. In the absence of information one can only trace the
characters of the parent species, and suggest names that are plausibly correct,
but in the case of secondary hybrids the method is not conclusive, as has
been frequently pointed out, and most recently at page 8, where eleven very
diverse forms of Odontoglossum percultum from the same capsule are
figured.

—_—

See eee

Pere

Se

Marcu, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 75

Many hybrids of doubtful or unrecorded parentage are submitted to us
for determination, and one can only deal with them as if they were natural
hybrids, without the advantage of knowing that they must have come from
a limited number of species that happen to grow together. It is rapidly
becoming impossible to state the origin of these complex plants by
examination of their characters, and we. can only urge once more the
importance of keeping accurate records.

—__—+>0<-— —
GROWING SPHAGNUM MOSS.

Av Orchid growers are aware of the value of live sphagnum moss for its
great assistance in promoting the healthy growth and development of the
plants, for without doubt, this moss, when it. is alive and in healthy ~
condition, is the ingredient in the potting compost, from which an Orchid
derives much nourishment. I was much interested when looking over the
collection of Orchids formed by T. Daws, Esq., J.P., of Ewhurst, Sussex,
to note the way in which the sphagnum grows on the benches and on the
pots of his Orchids. He attributes this chiefly to his being able to
replenish it when required from a living bed of sphagnum. Mr. Daws
hunted the many woods in this district for sphagnum moss several years
ago without result, when at length he came to a large pool of water by the
side of a wood, in the centre of which a very small quantity was growing.
The place seemed ideal for its cultivation, so, with the help of one of his
men, a ditch was dug to let out the surplus water, and when this had
lowered itself, a large bed of decomposed debris, like a large island, was
revealed, with clumps of willow and birch growing in it. Asa result of the
draining the sphagnum increased from the original .small amount, which
was only enough to fill a hat, at such a rate that now an area of some
twenty yards long by seven yards wide is completely covered with thick
short growing moss. He has thus, at some short distance from his house, a
constant supply of nice compact growing heads of living sphagnum. It is
obvious that sphagnum moss which can be procured so fresh must possess
far better qualities than that sent out for sale after having been kept in
sacks for at least several weeks, and is especially useful for top dressing.
Where Orchid growers have a shallow depression which will hold water, it
is quite easy to grow one’s own sphagnum. It does not require running
water, but likes to have it standing at an even height, if possible a few
inches below the level of some willow clumps, around which it will grow in
the greatest profusion. It seems to like shade, direct sunshine on it during
the summer months turning it yellow, but providing water is kept round it not
much harm will be done. The planting of a new bed in the first instance
is by no means difficult, and if a genial autumn follows an astonishing
amount of growth is quickly made. C. ALWyNn HarRIson.

76 THE ORCHID REVIEW: [MakCH, 1913.
ORCHID BREEDING.
THE MAKING OF A ‘‘ SCARLET CRISPUM.”’
EVER since the advent of the remarkable Odontioda Vuylstekez, in 1904,
the making of a ‘‘ Scarlet crispum ” has been the ambition of the hybridist,
and the first milestone on the road was passed when, less than three years
later, Odontioda Bradshawiz flowered with Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.,
and received a First-class Certificate from the R.H.S. It had been obtained
by crossing Cochlioda Neetzliana with the pollen of Odontoglossum

crispum—we believe a blotched form of it, though the blotching did not

come out in the hybrid—and bore a spike of thirteen flowers, of a brilliant

Fig. 20. -ODONTIODA BRADSHAWLA COOKSON’S VAR.

shade of cinnabar-scarlet. They were, however, rather deficient in size
and shape. A better-shaped form was raised in the collection of the late
Norman C. Cookson, Esq., by crossing a good typical white O. crispum
with the pollen of Cochlioda Noetzliana. this being one of the few cases in
which this Cochlioda has been successfully used as the pollen parent. It
was called Cookson’s variety. The photograph (see fig 20), Mr. Cookson
informed us, shows the exact size of the flowers when taken, being carefully
checked with callipers. This form is the nearest approach to O. crispum
in size and shape that we have seen, but it is by no means scarlet, as the

March, 1913.] _ THE ORCHID REVIEW. 77

margins of the petals and tips of the sepals are lilac mauve in colour, and
Mr. Cookson remarked in his letter that it was curious that another cross,
with the blotched O. crispum Graireanum as the pollen parent, should give
very much smaller pure scarlet-flowers, without spotting or blotching.

There are now several fine pure scarlet forms of O. Bradshawiz in
existence, and the question has been submitted to us as to how far they can
‘be utilised in breeding the much-desired scarlet crispum, for the secondary
hybrids of Odontioda Vuylstekee have shown a great loss of the scarlet
colour. Major Hurst has stated that the common practice of mating a
primary hybrid back to one of its parents cannot be expected to succeed,
because such a mating implies the presence of a “‘ single dose” only of one
of the two characters concerned, and he suggests that a simple solution of
the problem would be to mate two primary hybrids together that will give
a “double dose” of each of the two characters that the Orchid breeder
wishes to combine—in this case the scarlet colour of the Cochlioda with
the larger size of the Odontoglossum—and he says it is obvious that this
can be done simply by mating two of the F1 hybrids together, and, if
the case is a simple one, the desired result should be reached in F2, on the
average in one plant out of every sixteen raised.

This means, if we understand it aright, that if two primary hybrids were
mated together, each of which contained a ‘‘ double dose” of the size of one
original parent and the colour of the other, these characters would break up
and recombine, and among the seedlings there would be, on. an average, one
in sixteen combining the size of one original grandparent with the colour of
the other, hence the desired ‘‘Scarlet crispum.” But no such primary
hybrids exist, for there is. no species with large scarlet. flowers to begin with,
and such primary hybrids as are available only contain half a “‘ dose” of
the désired characters, the other half consisting of what the breeder is
trying to eliminate. Further, there is no evidence of such complete
Separation of character as would justify the hypothesis. Segregation of
previously combined characters has certainly been observed among hybrids,
but blending of diverse characters is a far more familiar feature.

It would be a very. simple matter to make the experiment of crossing
two primary hybrids together, to see whether there is such a “‘royal road
success. Indeed we believe that such crosses have already been made, and
the result is now awaited with interest. In other groups such crosses are
common, but we cannot recall one giving results parallel to the above
hypothetical case.

But to return. to the steétion of how far the pure scarlet forms of
Odontioda Bradshawiz can best be used in the production of a ‘‘ Scarlet
crispum.” Recrossing with the Cochlioda is out of the question, for that
would still further reduce the size of the flowers, and in recrossing with

78 THE ORCHID REVIEW. { Marcu, 1913-

Odontoglossum we should suggest using the finest pure white form that we
could get, preferably one that had a tendency to produce spikes with few
large flowers. Whether this would eliminate the rosy tinge seen in
secondary hybrids of Odontioda Vuylstekeze remains to be proved, but so
far as we know these have been raised from. blotched Odontoglossums,
and these often have a tinge of rose in the ground colour. The ideal second
parent we should suggest would be a fine Odontoglossum crispum virginale,
as the complete absence of rose and brown, even from the column and the
crest of the lip, should give the scarlet of the other parent full play, and
some of the scarlet forms of O. Bradshawie have apparently colour enough
for a much larger flower. We suspect that the ‘scarlet crispum ” will not
be obtained at a single step, particularly as regards size, and here restriction
of the number of flowers on a spike should be aimed at. It will be in.
teresting to see what the secondary hybrids of Odontioda Bradshawie are
like, and they are already beginning to flower, for Messrs. Charlesworth &
Co. exhibited Odontioda Latona (Odontoglossum spectabile x Odontioda
Bradshawie) at the last Holland House Show, and this was described as a
richly-coloured form with some darker blotches (O.R., xx. p. 247).
R.H.S. ORCHID COMMITTEE.

THE following constitute the Orchid Committee of the Royal Horticultural
Society for the current year. New members are indicated thus* :—

Fow er, J. GURNEY, Glebe Lands, South Woodford, Chairman.

VeiTcH, Sir Harry J., V.M.H., F.L.S., 34, Redcliffe Gardens, S.W.5
Vice-Chairman.

Hotrorp, Lieut.-Col. Sir GeorcE, K.C.V.O., C.I.E., Westonbirt,
Tetbury, Glos. ; Vice-Chairman.

CoLMAN, Sir JEREMIAH, Bart., V.M.H., Gatton Park, Reigate; Vice-
Chairman. |

O’Brien, JAMEs, V.M.H., Marian, Harrow-on-the-Hill ; Hon. Secretary.

ALEXANDER, H. G., Westonbirt Gardens, Tetbury.

ARMSTRONG, T., Sandhurst Park, Tunbridge Wells.

ASHWORTH, Evian, Harefield Hall, Wilmslow, Cheshire.

Botton, W., Wilderspool, Warrington.

Bounp, W. P., 112, Station Road, Redhill.

BROOMAN-WHITE, R., Arddarroch, Garelochhead, N.B.

BuTLer, W. WaTERS, Southfield, Norfolk Road, Edgbaston.

CuHapMan, H. J., Oakwood Gardens, Wylam-on-Tyne.

CHARLESWORTH, J., Lyoth House, Haywards Heath.

Coxns, W., Normanhurst, Rusper, Horsham.

Cookson, CLIVE, Oakwood, Wylam-on-Tyne.

(CRAWSHAY, DE Barri, Rosefield, Sevenoaks.

MARCH, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 79

Curtis, C. H., 2, Adelaide Road, Brentford, Middlesex.
CYPHER, JAMES, V.M.H., Queen’s Road, Cheltenham.
Dye, A., Tring Park Gardens, Tring.

*FLory, SIDNEY W., Amyand Park Road, Twickenham.
Hanpory, F. J., F.L.S., Brockhurst, East Grinstead.
HaTcuer, W. H., Rawdon, Leeds.

*HunreER, G., Blenheim Palace Gardens, Woodstock, Oxon.
Low, Stuart H., Bush Hill Park, Enfield.

Lucas, C. J., Warnham Court, Horsham.

McBeay, A. A., Cooksbridge, Sussex.

Moore, Sir F. W., M.A., V.M.H., Roy. Bot. Gdns., Glasnevin, Dublin.
Moore, G. F., Chardwar, Bourton-on-the- Water, Glos.
Moss, J, S., Wintershill House, Bishop’s Waltham.
OGILVIE, F. MENTEITH, 72, Woodstock Road, Oxford.
PoTTeER, J. WILson, 219, Ashley Gardens, S.W.

Roire, R. A., A.L.S., 12, Lawn Crescent, Kew.

SANDER, F., V.M.H., St. Albans.

SHILL, J. E., The Dell Gardens, Englefield Green.
THOMPSON, W., Walton Grange, Stone, Staffs.

TuHwaltEs, R. G., 23, Christchurch:Road, Streatham, S.W.
Wuirte, W. H., Burford Lodge Gardens, Dorking.
WItson, GuRNEY, F.L.S., Glenthorne, Haywards Heath.

SELENOCYPRIPEDIUM MALHOUITRI.

AT a meeting of the Société Nationale d’Horticulture de France held on
November 28th last a curious hybrid, said to have been obtained by
crossing Cypripedium Harrisianum with the pollen of Selenipedium
Schlimii, was exhibited by.M. Eugéne Boullet, of Corbie, under the name
of Selenocypripedium Malhouitri (Journ. Soc. Nat. Hort. Fr., 1912, p. 706).

The flower is said to have retained the dorsal sepal of the mother plant,.
modified by some maroon and red spots, which replace the maroon and
green lines of C. Harrisianum., The petals are linear, much reduced in:
breadth, and lined with maroon on a green ground. The lip is smaller than
in S. Schlimii, curved and projecting in front, and the colour green, much
spotted with red brown. Although not of much interest from a decorative
standpoint, it is said to quite dispel a very general idea that the two genera
cannot be crossed together. Only two seedlings were obtained, one of
which died when very young, so that the plant is at present unique.
We should be much obliged for a flower of this interesting plant, for
previous crosses between the two genera which we have seen did not show
any hybrid character. M. Boullet is said to havea capsule nearly mature
on C. Leeanum crossed by S. Schlimii.

that they we
being forced
eighteen hundred miles by
from Shanghai on March r4th
Arboretum,

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

{MARCH, :913-

CHINESE CYPRIPEDIUMS.
WHEN figuring the Chinese Cypripedium Franchetii, at page 358 of our
last volume, we alluded to two other Chinese species which have been
introduced from the Thibetan borderland by Mr. E. H. Wilson, namely,
C. luteum and C. tibeticum. These, through the kindness of the Editor of
Horticulture, we are also abie to figure.

five years, flowered for the first time in cultivation at the Arnold Aboretum

in May, 1g11, when the photograph was taken, and Mr. Wilson remarks

C. LUTEUM (fig. 20), which has been known to science for nearly twenty-

Pig. 2%.

CYPRIPEDIUM LUTEUM.
si " LN, | c ° + . . ee
ere only about half their usual dimensions on account of theit
1. The roots were

dug up in October, Igto0, transported some
oy porters, boat, and steamer, and finally shipped
, 1911. They were received at the Arnold
Boston, on April 12th, were potted and kept in a

sreenhouse,

ie

W.

4
¥

REVIEI

ie)
dL
poe
wy
fondle
cos
al
v
Fon
ov
v
2 8]
—
.
~
U
al
tz)
a

ORCHID

~
4
4

THE

CYPRIPEDIUM

82 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (MarcH, 1913-

and on May 6th the flowers were expanded and the photograph was taken.
Mr. Wilson remarks that although the roots were a full six months from

the time of collecting to that of planting they came through in good shape, |

and hundreds are growing. freely in the Abcretum nurseries. Their
hardiness, as judged from the altitude at which they occur in a native state,
and from plants growing in association with them, is assured. It grows
from mine to eighteen inches high, and has solitary clear yellow flowers
with usually a few spots or blotches of orange brown on the face of the lip.

C. luteum was originally discovered by Pere David, at Moupine, E.
Tibet, in June, 1869, and was described by Franchet in 1888 (PI. David.,
ii. p. 126). Afterwards it was collected by Delavay around Tali, in the
province of Yunnan, where it was said to be common at about 10,000 feet
elevation. Since then it has been met with by various collectors in Western
China at altitudes varying from 8000 to 11,000 feet. Mr. Wilson remarks
that its habitat is the margins of woods and thickets, and is also found on
scrub-clad boulders stranded in bogs. Around Sungpan, in the extreme
north-west corner of Szechuen, it is abundant in thin woods of spruce and
silver fir, growing near the margin of certain glacial torrents which are
_surcharged with. petrifying -limestone. Nevertheless, having . seen it
growing in a variety of soils, he hesitates to say that a calcareous soil is
necessary. A cool moist situation and plenty of leaf soil would seem the
essentials.

In habit, vigour, and general appearance the species closely resembles
the North American C. Regine, and indeed has been confused with it, for
the remark that the latter had “recently been discovered in Western China,
on the borders of Tibet, together with the remarkable little C. arietinum,
also a native of Canada and Eastern North America” (O.R., i. p. 269), was
based on a dried specimen of C. luteum. At that time no specimen 0
C. luteum was available for comparison, and the two are much alike except
in colour, which cannot be made out from dried specimens. We may now
hope to see the species alive, as living plants might now reach this country
at any time. ,

C. TIBETICUM, as found in its native home in the month of June, is
shown in fig. 21, from a photograph taken by Mr. Wilson. He remarks
that it is widely spread along the Chino-Thibetan borderland and on the
Alpine moorlands, between 10,000 and 13,000 feet elevation, and is
numerically one of the commonest plants. It occurs in countless thousands, aS
indicated by the photograph, and is possibly the finest of all red-flowered

_hardy Cypripediums. The flowers are solitary, very large, with sepals and ©

petals striped and reticulated with reddish purple on a paler ground colour,
and the pouch usually dark maroon purple, rarely paler. This species was
introduced to cultivation several years ago, Mr. Wilson having sent a few

ati

Marcu, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 83°

plants to Messrs. James Veitch & Sons in April, 1905, which flowered a
Coombe Wood in the following June. Its history was then given in our
pages (xill. p. 194), and soon afterwards a figure appeared in the Botanical
Magazine (t. 8070). A year later it was exhibited at the Temple Show,
and received a First-class Certificate. A considerable number of plants are
now in the Arnold Arboretum. It may be added that, owing to the width
of the block, we were unable to insert the name at the base. The picture,
however, should be viewed from the side.

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR MARCH.
By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
Wit the advent of March the season of growth is rapidly approaching,.
and there will be plenty to occupy both the hands and the minds of those
who have the care and attention of a large collection of Orchids.

TEMPERATURES.—Owing to more favourable conditions outside, the
temperatures may now range a few degrees higher all round, both night and
day, than those given in the January number. The atmospheric conditions
must naturally follow the temperatures, and more moisture may now be
safely used. A humid atmosphere may now be maintained in all the
divisions, and the conditions must be conducive to free and healthy growth.
The sun’s power at this season is often considerable, and sufficient to warm
the houses during the daytime without the aid of fire heat, but sufficient
artificial warmth is requisite to maintain the temperatures at night.
During periods of bright sunshine a hot dry atmosphere must be avoided,
as these conditions always bring in their train thrip and other pests which
do irreparable damage.

VENTILATION.—The greatest care must be exercised during the present
month, and often, instead of opening the ventilators too wide, it may be
advisable to use the blinds to keep the temperatures down to their normal
level. Fresh air must be admitted on all favourable occasions in every’
department. I have never yet seen plants thrive in stuffy, badly ventilated.
houses, but care must be taken that no draughts are caused, for one is as
much of an evil as the other.

WATERING must still be done with discretion, for growth is not yet
active, and the smaller amount of fire heat necessary to maintain the
temperatures, and the greater amount of humidity in the houses, entails less
evaporation from the compost. Care should be taken that the plants.
actually require water before it is applied tothem. The usual caution must
be displayed in applying water to all newly-potted plants, as this, to my
mind, is often the cause of many plants not doing satisfactorily.

SHADING, that was put into position as advised last month, will now
come into general use, but must not be applied to excess, and the plants.

84 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MaRCH, 1913-

should receive as much light as possible, especially at this season of the
year. Owing to the sunless season of last year, and the great number of
wet, dull days we have experienced during the winter, the plants should be
inured to the heat and light of the sun gradually. Heat and light are
-essential to some classes of Orchids, and these should be kept apart from
the shade-loving kinds, which are incapable of withstanding an excessive
amount of light.

CypRIPEDIUMS.—The potting of these useful winter-flowering plants
should be attended to as fast as they pass out of flower. Should there be any
danger of the compost becoming decayed before another season, it is much
the best practise to repot them now. The compost advised in the January
number will answer their requirements. The sooner the potting of this
family is completed the better, for plants that are well established and
rooted yield flowers of improved quality.

EpIpENDRUMS.—Such Epidendrums as E. radicans, and the hybrids
FE. Burtonii, E. O’Brienianum, E. Boundii, and others, are rooting freely,
and any that have become unsightly and require repotting may be attended
to. They may be grown as single stems in small pots, or several may be
placed together to form specimens. The long straggling stems should be
taken off, just below where the new aérial roots are pushing forth. When
grown as single stems they are easily potted, but when several are grown
together it requires some little pains to make a well-balanced and even
Specimen. This is best accomplished by starting with the tallest growths
in the centre and placing the others round it until the sides of the pot or
pan are reached, where the shortest growths will make a finish. The above
succeed in an intermediate temperature. E. vitellinum, although disliking
root disturbance, must have attention when. the compost becomes
decomposed and sour. Plants that are developing new roots should
receive attention, especially if there is any danger of the compost becoming
-exhausted before another season’s repotting comes round. If the compost
is sweet, and the pots sufficiently large, they may with safety be left over
until another season. This species succeeds best at the warm end of the
Cool house. Epidendrums thrive in a similar compost to Cattleyas, but
must not be potted so firmly. Freshly-potted plants should be watered
sparingly until the new roots have entered the compost and the growths
get some two or three inches long, when liberal supplies of moisture may be
afforded them.

EPIPHRONITIS VEITCHII.—This pretty dwarf bigeneric hybrid, which
some growers find difficult to cultivate to their satisfaction, is continually
pushing roots from the stems, and should be dealt with in the same manner
_as Epidendrum radicans, which is one of the parents. It is desirable to
place five or six shoots in a shallow pan, and suspend them in a moist

Marcu, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 85

position in an Intermediate house: It will succeed in a similar compost to-
that used for Epidendrums:

DEcIDUOUS CALANTHES.—These desirable winter- fiswéelae Orchids,,.
having been kept dry and resting since their flowering period, will now be
commencing to grow, and should be repotted before they push new roots to-
any length, otherwise there is danger of their being broken. The compost
should be shaken from the old roots, which should be shortened, leaving
them just long enough to hold the pseudobulbs in position. Leave the
pseudobulb of the previous year’s growth with the new shoot, any older
ones being removed. These may be placed upon a layer of sphagnum
moss or half-decayed leaves in some shallow receptacle, and be placed in a
warm temperature, when they will quickly produce new growths, which
may be potted up in the same way as the leading.growths. Plants may be
placed singly or several together, but in either case the pots must not be
too large. Owing to the quantity of water required when in full growth,
the base of the pseudobulbs should be kept below the rim of the pots. A
suitable compost consists of half peat and half loam, from which all the
fine particles have been taken, mixed with some sphagnum moss and dried
cow manure. I am aware that many advocate a much more substantial
and richer compost, but I prefer to rely on generous feeding when the plants
are thoroughly established. During the early stages of growth discretion is
needed in the application of water to the compost, an excess being often
the cause of these plants being unsatisfactory. Whilst in growth they
require plenty of heat and atmospheric moisture, and should not be exposed
too much to the sun’s rays. During the past season these delightful
Orchids have been shown in wonderful condition, and in several cases ‘from
gardens which do not make a speciality of Orchids, and undoubtedly by
such means the love of Orchids is fostered.

-THUNIAS, as they commence to grow,’ must be repotted before they
commence to push forth roots. They will succeed in the same
compost as the preceding, and under the same conditions, except that they
require a sunny position well up to the glass. They must be sparingly
watered until their flower spikes appear at the apex of ‘the newly-made
stems. ;

Pualvus, likewise, will succeed in the same compost, and under the same’
conditions, both as regards temperatures and other details. Those that are
in need of new rooting material should have attention just before the new
growth commences to push roots.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA, also some ‘of its hybrids, are pushing forth
flower spikes from the partly-developed pseudobulbs. The plants may be
watered whenever they become dry, and towards the end of the month may
be placed in cooler quarters. The warm end of the Cool house or the

86 THE ORCHID: REVIEW. (MaRCcH, 1913.

coolest end of an Intermediate house will answer their requirements. At
this season every precaution must be taken against the attacks of thrip and
other insect pests, mild periodical fumigations with some reliable vapourising
compound being the best remedy.

DenpRosIUMs of the deciduous section will now make quite a gay
picture in our houses, and the season can be prolonged for some consider-
-able time by bringing some on gradually and keeping others back in cool
quarters. Noattempt at forcing those varieties that are at all scarce should
be attempted, as fine flowers are not made by subjecting the plants to
‘unnecessary heat. D. Phalznopsis and its numerous varieties that are
developing new growths, and that are in need of fresh rooting material,
may have attention as soon as new roots are observed to be pushing from
‘the base. The most important detail in the cultivation of this class of
plants is to give them plenty of heat, moisture, and light whilst in full
growth, with a dry rest after blooming. This and the allied species will
succeed in a similar compost to the deciduous section.

Cattleyas, Lzliocattleyas, Brassocattleyas, and others that have passed
-out of flower and are commencing to make new roots, should have attention
as regards repotting. It is necessary that the compost in which these
various Orchids are grown should be kept in a sweet and healthy condition,
as no Orchids resent sour material more than these. A suitable mixture is
comprised of the following materials; equal portions of peat, polypodium,
Ar. and osmunda fibres, and sphagnum moss, all thoroughly cleaned and
used in a rough state. If any difficulty is found in getting good peat fibre
it may be left out, potting the plants quite firmly ip-the other materials.

VaNDAS.—Such plants as Vanda teres, V. Hookeriana, the hybrid
V. Miss Joaquim, with Renanthera coccinea, and other species which
succeed under the same conditions, should be placed in their growing
-quarters, as no gain is likely to accrue from extending the resting
season. These plants enjoy all the light possible, therefore the lightest
‘possible position in the East Indian house or plant stove should be selected
for them.

PLEIONEs.—The late-flowering Pleiones, such as P. humilis and P.
Hookeriana, should have attention as regards new rooting material, should
it be necessary. A compost as previously advised for such varieties as P.
maculata, P. lagenaria, and P. Wallichiana, which are now growing
vigorously, will satisfy their requirements.

PHALZNoPsIs that have bloomed and are commencing to make new
roots may have any attention that is necessary. They are best grown in
baskets suspended from the roof and not placed too near the glass, as they
are liable to suffer from extremes of heat and cold. Healthy established
plants that have roots clinging to the baskets in which they are growing

iar serees hopes Via oooaet

SRR en

Sea es

Marcu, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 87

should not be disturbed, beyond removing the old decayed rooting material.
This should be carefully picked out, the drainage made good, and the
receptacles carefully filled up anew. Those in need of fresh receptacles
should have any clinging roots carefully detached with the aid of a thin-
bladed knife or similar article. Select for each plant a suitable basket or
suitably-drained small pan, then work the compost carefully amongst the
roots. The Cattleya compost is a suitable rooting medium for them. These
plants require an abundance of moisture in the atmosphere during active
growth, and even during the winter months it is not desirable to keep the
house in which they are growing as dry as others.

GENERAL REMARKS.—We have now passed the worst of another winter,
and our plants will respond to the more genial conditions. No attempt yet
should be made to rush the plants into growth, but let each individual wake
up, so to speak, and start its season’s work in its own way, giving each the
best care and attention, according to its needs, at our disposal. Every
effort should be made to eradicate insect pests that trouble us, as, if
unchecked, these parasites are continually doing much harm.

HYBRIDS RAISED BY M. CH. MARON.
WE have received from M. Ch. Maron, Brunoy, Seine et Oise, France,
records of a few fine hybrids raised by him which have not yet been
recorded in our pages, with the place and date of exhibition. M. Maron
raises a large number of seedlings every year, and this is only a selection, a
good many others not having yet: been exhibited.

BRASSOCATLELIA ANDRE Maron (C. Schroedere X B.-c. Leemanniz).
—Paris, November 23, 1911.

BRASSOCATLELIA AURORA (L.-c. Ernestii x B.-c. Leemanniz).—Paris,
March 9g, rgrr.

BrassocaTL&LIA BEAvcIS (L.-c. Fournieri xX B.-c. Leemannize).—
London, October 24, 1911. This was recorded as B.-c.-l. Baucis (O.R.,
XIX. p. 342), without parentage, and we are glad to be able to make the
correction.

BRassocaTL#@LIA Leonarpi (B.-l. Helen x C. Mossiz).—Royal
International Horticultural Exhibition, Chelsea, May, 1912.

BRAssOCATTLEYA D1ETRICHIANA (C. Fabia Vigeriana x B.-c. Lee-
manniz).—Brussels, March 23, 1910).

CaTTLEYA Muritto (C. Maronii x C. Dowiana Rosita).—Brussels
International Exhibition, October, 1gIo.

CaTTLEyA Sicinp (C. Dowiana aurea X C. Adonis).—Paris Autumn
Exhibition, rgrr.

L#LIOCATTLEYA ALPHAND (C. Fabia Vigeriana X L.-c. callistoglossa).
—Brussels, October, IgIo.

88 THE ORCHID REVIEW. | MARCH, 1913.

CHONDRORHYNCBHA LIPSCOMBIZ.
WE have now the pleasure of giving an illustration (fig. 23) of Chon-
drorhyncha: Lipscombiz, a pretty species which flowered in the collection
of Mrs. Lipscomb, Wilton Grove, Wimbledon, in December, 1911, and was
shortly afterwards described (Rolfe in. Kew Bulletin, 1912, p. 133). It is a,
native of Panama, and was discovered by Mrs. Lipscomb’s son, Mr.
Lancelot Lipscomb, in unexplored bush on the hills near Las Cascades,
and also near Bohio. The photograph represents the plant as growing in
its native habitat, on the branches of high trees, and a second photograph
was sent, giving a side view of the flower. Only part of the leaves is shown.
A living flower was sent with the photographs, and Mrs. Lipscomb:

Fig. 23. CHONDRORHYNCHA LIPSCOMBI#.

remarks that this flower is quite as good as in the photograph and the
leaves are better. The flower sent is the second that the plant has borne
this winter, and another appears to be coming. The scape is rather longer
than in the wild specimen. The flowers are white, with some light purple
veins on the lip. The species is allied to C. albicans, Rolfe, but has longer
leaves, larger flowers, and a distinctly lobed lip. The genus now contains
eight species, of which the remarkable C., Chestertonii is the best known.
It is nearly allied to Warscewiczella, and requires similar treatment. The
habit and absence of pseudobulbs would indicate that the plant is acti

through the greater part of the year, and should not be subjected to a dry

VE

rest, as are some other Orchids. It is a very interesting acquisition.

MARCH, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW.

ONCIDIUM CHEIROPHORUM.

om
~
[4
ae
~
aw
—
_
~
=
~
_
~
_
~
a

ak at ue Pe ar ; yr
THE annexed figure represents a remarkably fine:specimen of the charming
little Oncidium cheirophorum, which was shown in the collection of

go THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MarcH, 1913.

F. Ducane Godman, Esq., South Lodge, Horsham, by Mr. G. Giles. It
was exhibited, with several others, at the R.H.S. Show of Autumn-flowering
Orchids held at Westminster last November, and attracted much attention,
both from Orchid fanciers and from gardeners who regarded it from a
purely decorative standpoint.

The species was discovered by the Polish collector, Warscewicz, on the
Chiriqui Volcano, Central America, in December, 1848, being found
growing on oak trees at 8000 feet elevation, where the temperature is said
to fall as low as 40°-45° Fahr. at night. Plants were introduced, which
flowered for the first time in Europe in the collections of Senator Jenisch
and Consul Schiller, at Hamburgh, in 1852, when it was described by
Reichenbach (Bot. Zeit., 1852, p. 695). According to the latter, it next
appeared in public at Mr. Bridges’ sale at Stevens’ Rooms in 1856. Its
history was given by Reichenbach in 1871 (Gard. Chron., 1871, p. 168), the
author remarking: ‘‘ We feel much pleased to obtain it now from several
of our London correspondents, as from J. Day, Esq., Messrs. Veitch &
Sons, &c. One correspondent informs us that the anther is smooth, and
has gigantic wings projecting from the column, just like a large old-
fashioned bonnet. Though we should feel much frightened at such a
creature with a nose like the beak of the anther, yet we feel quite
enchanted at such a genial comparison, which reminds us of Dr. Lindley’s
often very funny and witty allusions. It is, indeed, the best philosophy to
draw amusement from flowers, and we believe that Orchids are quite
unrivalled in the endless riches of queer and astonishing formations they
present, so often exceedingly difficult even toa monographer. The large
crest would afford a very nice saddle for some insect, tasting, perhaps, the
honey from the two warts at the base of the lip. We despair, however,
of the insect being able to assist the act of fecundation, for the great wings
and the formidable processus of the column, if presented like the trunk of
an excited elephant, would be such impediments as to make selfish honey-
drinking egotists out of the little hexapods.”’

O. cheirophorum is one of the prettiest of the small-flowering species,
and one that succeeds well in the Odontoglossum house, producing 4
profusion of its graceful inflorescences. It is figured at t. 6278 of the
Botanical Magazine. The specific name, ‘‘ Wallflower-bearing,’’ refers to
the yellow colour resembling that of some species of Cheiranthus. For the
loan of the block we are indebted to the Editor of the Journal of Horticulture.

Two very pretty companion plants were exhibited in the same group at
the Show in question, namely the rosy lilac Oncidium ornithorhynchum,
and its white variety, album. They are natives of the mountains of Mexico
and Guatemala, always at considerable elevations, and succeed well under
the same treatment as Oncidium cheirophorum.

8 Sai ll

Marcu, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. gl

SOCIETIES.
RoyaAL HORTICULTURAL.

AT the fortnightly meeting held on February 4th last there was a good
display of Orchids, and the awards consisted of seven medals, two First-
class Certificates, and three Awards of Merit.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), J.
O’Brien (hon. sec.), de Barri Crawshay, Gurney Wilson, J. S. Moss,
W. H. White, A. Dye, J. E. Shill, J. Cypher, H. G. Alexander, J. Charles-
worth, F. Sander, F. J. Hanbury, S. Low, J. Wilson Potter, W. Cobb,
T. Armstrong, W. Bolton, R. A. Rolfe, W. H. Hatcher, C. H. Curtis, C. J.
Lucas, Sir Harry J. Veitch, and Sir Jeremiah Colman.

H. J. Bromielow, Esq., Rann Lea, Rainhill, Lanes. (gr. Mr. Morgan),
sent Cypripedium Euryades New Hall Hey var., a very fine and hand-
somely-blotched form, and C. Alcibiades illustre, with a very broad green
and white dorsal sepal. ;

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
sent two very fine plants of Odontoglossum Lady Roxburghe (cirrhosum X
percultum), one of them bearing a large panicle of seventy blooms.

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent
Odontoglossum Cassandra (Urania Xx crispum), a pretty cream white
flower, spotted with red-brown, and having a very spiny crest, O. Calypso
(triumphans X Lambeauianum), a well-shaped flower, most like the latter
in colour, and O. Cleopatra (Carmania X Vulystekei), having light yellow,
heavily blotched sepals and petals, and a white lip, blotched with purple in
front of the yellow crest.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent the hand-
some Odontoglossum Wiganianum Goodson’s var. (Wilckeanum X Rolfez),
having clear yellow sepals and petals, spotted with purple brown, Odontioda
Thwaitesii, Odontoglossum Cassiope Fairlawn var., and Lycaste xytriophora
with six flowers.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent Cymbidium Gottianum var. Dawn (eburneum X
insigne), a beautiful white form, with a rosy zone round the front of the
lip, C. G. var. The Pearl, another charming white form, having a few
purple spots on the lip and a purple column, Cypripedium Constantine, a
handsome form of unknown parentage, having a broad white dorsal sepal
veined and spotted with purple, and Leliocattleya Dorothy (C. Schroederee
X L.-c. Doris), having a spike of four light yellow flowers, tinged with
Salmon pink, and the front of the lip crimson.

C. J. Phillips, Esq., The Glebe, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Bucknell), sent
Odontoglossum Antiope var. Reseda (Rossii X Edwardii), a very pretty

92 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MaRCH, 1913.

form, having bright purple flowers, tipped with lilac, and a light yellow
blotch on the disc of the lip, and O. Phocis (Phoebe x Solon), a finely-
blotched flower.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a brilliant group,
including some fine white forms of Lelia anceps, the pretty Brassocatlelia
Joan (B.-l. Gratrixie x C. Octave Doin), Brassocattleya Veitchii var.
Queen Alexandra, B.-c. langleyensis, Brassolelia Gratrixiz, a well-bloomed
Sophrolelia Psyche, Leliocattleya bella, Phalenopsis Schilleriana,
Trichopilia sanguinolenta, the chaste Zygopetalum Mackayi Charles-
worthii, Miltonia Warscewiczii, the clear yellow Oncidium splendidum
aureum, Odontioda Cassiope and Diana, with a number of good Odonto-
glossums and Cypripediums (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a select group’
including some good Dendrobium Wardianum, Phalenopsis Schilleriana,
Stuartiana and Sanderiana, Calanthe bella, William Murray and Bryan,
Lycaste Skinneri, Ada aurantiaca, Spathoglottis Colmanii aurea, Cypri-
pedium Boltonii, C. Venus, C. Gracez, C. aureum Surprise, and other
good Cypripediums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a pretty group, including
some good Leliocattleya callistoglossa, Cattleya Frederickiz, Miltonia
Warscewiczii, Brassolelia Helen, Cypripedium Venus Orchidhurst var.,
Odontoglossum percultum, O. armainvillierense, and others (Bronze
Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a showy group,
including Lelia superbiens with three spikes, Cattleya Fabia, C. Triane
alboviolacea with the front of the lip slaty blue, another form with a sharply-
defined purple blotch at the apex of the sepals and petals, white and
coloured forms of Lycaste Skinneri, Dendrobium Wardianum, Ansellia

confusa, Gomeza Barkeri, Cymbidium Wig , an intense blue form
of Vanda ccerulea, and a number of Cypripediums (Silver Banksian Medal),

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, sent a group of Cattleya Triane, showing
a wide range of variation, and including some with variegated and flaked
sepals and petals (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a good group of Cattleyas,
Leliocattleyas, Odontoglossums and Cypripediums, the latter including C.
Vandyck (hirsutissimum Xx Mons. de Curte), C. Milo, C. Lathamianum
Sander’s var., a yellow spotted form of C. Priam (Niobe x _ insigne
Sanderz), with the dark spotted type, the rare Lelia Lundu, Eria rosea,
the pretty little Pleione yunnanensis, Saccolabium bellinum, Gongora
truncata, Eulophia lurida, Dendrobium gracile, Ornithidium densum,
Odontioda Bradshawie, Gomeza planifolia, Pleurothallis cardiothallis, and
a fine specimen of Epidendrum laterale (Silver Banksian Medal).

Marcu, 1913 | THE ORCHID REVIEW. 93

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a good group, including
Miltonia Warscewiczii, Lycaste Skinneri, the distinct Oncidium anthocrene,
Odontoglossum Doris, a well-spotted O. Lambeauianum, Odontioda Devos-
siana, the fine Cattleya Triane Courtauldiana, C. Ianthe, and some good
Cypripediums, including home-raised forms of C. insigne Sander, and a
batch from C, Countess of Carnarvon X Euryades (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, sent Cattleya Trianez
coerulea and violacea, both white forms having some slaty blue on the front
of the lip, and a hybrid from Cypripedium aureum virginale x Venus, a
prettily spotted form most like the latter.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

CymBipIUuM Lapy CoLMAN vaR. GOLDEN QUEEN (Veitchii x Tracy-
anum).—A very beautiful form, bearing two spikes of flowers having
unusually yellow sepals and petals with dotted brown lines, and a yellowish
white, well-spotted lip. Exhibited by Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

OD(C NTOGLOSSUM ARDENTISSIMUM Expor.—A very large and handsome
form, bearing a spike of twenty-one flowers, with white sepals and petals,
heavily blotched with violet-purple. Exhibited by Baron Bruno Schréder,
The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cympipium J. Davis (Schreederi X insigne).—A distinct and pretty
hybrid, in which the influence of C. insigne is well shown. The spike is
erect, the sepals and petals pale buff with red-brown lines, and the lip
white, with some red-brown spots and markings. Exhibited by J. Gurney
Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis),

ODONTOGLOSSUM AMANDUM (Pescatorei X Wilckeanum).—A very hand-
some form, bearing white flowers of excellent form and substance, with
large claret blotches at the apex of the sepals and petals, and a purple band
on the lip in front of the crest. Exhibited by C. J. Phillips, Esq.,
Sevenoaks.

Oncipiopa Cooxsoni1& (C. Neetzliana X O. macranthum).—A striking
hybrid, having an elongated branched inflorescence, bearing numerous
reddish orange flowers, most like the Oncidium parent in shape, but
smaller, the lip being three-lobed, with a yellow crest. Exhibited by
Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

At the meeting held on February 18th there was a very fine display of
Orchids, and the awards consisted of no fewer than five First-class
Certificates, with one Award of Merit and eight medals.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, J. S. Moss, R.
Rolfe, Stuart Low, F. M. Ogilvie, F. Hanbury, T. Armstrong, C. H.

94 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MarcH, 1913.

Curtis, W. Cobb, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, J. E. Shill,
W. P. Bound, H. G. Alexander, A. Dye, W. H. White, de B. Crawshay, J.
Wilson Potter, Sidney Flory, W. Bolton, R. Brooman White, C. J. Lucas,
and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), staged a fine
group, to which a Silver Flora Medal was awarded. The centre was made
up of good plants of Phaius Norman, with a number of Lezliocattleyas,
Odontiodas, and Odontoglossums on either side, the latter including varieties
of O. armainvillierense, O. Wiganianum, the richly-coloured O. Amethyst,
and O. Lambeauianum Harry Goodson, a pretty light yellow flower with
numerous purple spots.

Miss Baker Baker, Elmore Hall, Durham (gr. Mr. Roberts), sent Bletilla
hyacinthina alba, a narrow-leaved white-flowered form, said to have been
received from Darjeeling, where it-may possibly have been collected, as no
Indian habitat is known.

S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr. Brown), sent a magnificent
plant of Odontoglossum crispum Leonard Perfect, bearing a spike of
fourteen very fine flowers, with a large purple-red blotch on each of the
segments, and a chestnut brown blotch on the lip.

Lieut.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent examples of Cymbidium Alexanderi and C. Gottianum,
Cattleya Triane Castor, a well-coloured form, and Lzliocattleya Valeria
(luminosa X Dora) having buff yellow sepals and petals veined with rose.

F. J. O. Montagu, Esq., Mundford, Norfolk, sent Cypripedium Mrs.
Montagu (aureum Surprise x Leeanum Clinkaberryanum), most like the
former, but larger and more yellow in colour.

F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr. Balmforth), showed
the handsome Odontioda Mrs. F. M. Ogilvie, bearing a spike of fourteen
flowers, and a well-grown plant of Odontoglossum crispum Lady Jane.

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), sent
Odontoglossum crispum Perdita, a prettily blotched form, and Cypripedium
Ophir (exul X Calypso), most like the latter in character.

E. de Q. Quincey, Esq., Oakwood, Chislehurst (gr. Mr. Lees), sent
Cattleya Triane The Admiral, a pretty hybrid between Cypripedium
concolor and C. Godefroyz, and a hybrid Dendrobium.

Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr.
Shill), sent Odontoglossum crispum var. The Dell Sunrise, a fine white
form, with slight ruby red margin to the petals and an occasional claret
coloured spot.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including some fine forms of Odontoglossum eximium and armainvillierense,
two plants of the charming O. a. xanthotes, one bearing a large branched

Maxcu, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 95

spike, O. Phoebe magnificum, some good examples of Lelia anceps
Schroederiana, Miltonia Roezlii, a good plant of Angraecum citratum with
four spikes, the rare A. Leonis, Brassocatlelia Joan, a pretty yellow hybrid,
Sophronitis grandiflora, Vanda Amesiana, Brassocattleya Sedenii, Cattleya
Tityus, Odontioda Bradshawiz, some showy Leeliocattleyas, and others
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, containing over
fifty fine forms of Cattleya Trianz, including a few white forms, Dendro-
chilum glumaceum, Eria amica, some good forms of Laliocattleya Trimyra
(L.-c. Myra x C. Trianz alba), buff yellow with claret-coloured lip, the
variety alba, from the same seed pod, having white segments and a yellow
throat to the lip, Odontoglossum Fletcherianum, O. nevadense, some good
O. Pescatorei, Ada aurantiaca with eight spikes, some good Cypripediums,
Lycaste Skinneri and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a good group,
including Phalznopsis Schilleriana, Zygopetalum crinitum, some good
Calanthe Bryan and Lycaste Skinneri, a fine example of Angraecum
superbum, Cattleya Trianz, and some good Cypripediums (Silver Banksian
Medal).

The Liverpool Horticultural Co., Gateacre, sent a group of hybrids from
Lelia Cowanii and Cattleya Trianew, showing much variation in colour,
some being buff yellow and others having the front of the lip purple; also
a few other hybrids, and examples of Cattleya Harrisoniana (Silver Banksian
Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a good group,
including some richly-coloured Leliocattleyas, choice forms of Cattleya
Triane, C. Percivaliana and var. Little Gem, a pretty white variety with a
pink front lobe to the lip, a pretty light purple Lzliocattleya from L.-c.
Gottoiana x C. Dowiana aurea, Odontoglossum Zephyr, the rare Angrecum
Leonis, and some well-flowered examples of Dendrobium Wardianum
(Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, staged a good group of Cattleya Triane,
showing much variation, and including a few forms having flaked petals
(Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, staged a nice group, including
some examples of Lelia anceps Schroederiana, Cattleya Triane, Cymbidium
Gottianum, C. Schlegelii, C. Veitchii, some fine examples of C. insigne,
Odontoglossum crispum and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

M. Maurice Mertens, Ghent, sent Miltonia Bleuana nobilior, and a few
hybrid Odontoglossums and Odontiodas.

IRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.
BRASSOCATTLEYA AMABILIS GOopsON’s VAR. (B.-c. Leémania x C.

96 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MaRCH, 191 3.

Mossiz).—A very richly coloured form, of excellent shape, having rosy mauve
flowers with a large amount of yellow on the disc of the lip. Exhibited by
H. S. Goodson, Esq.

BRASSOCATTLEYA MENDA (B.-c. Veitchii Queen Alexandra x C. labiata
Virginia). A beautiful blush white flower, of excellent shape and substance,
and having a broad crimson line-like blotch on the well-fringed lip, in front
of the yellow disc. Exhibited by Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom
(gr. Mr. Hunt).

CATTLEYA TRIANZ THE Baron.—A beautiful white flower, of excellent
shape, and the lip blush pink in front of the light yellow disc. Exhibited
by Baron Bruno Schrdéder.

CYMBIDIUM ALEXANDERI FOWLER’s var. (insigne X Veitchii).—A very
large and beautiful form, most like the former, and having blush pink sepals
and petals with dotted rosy lines, and the undulate lip cream white with
dark red veining. Exhibited by J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S.
Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis).

ODONTOGLOSSUM AMETHYST GLEBELANDS VAR. (Lambeauianum X
eximium).—A fine form, having deep reddish claret flowers, with some
white markings on the lower part of the segments and a white front to the
lip. Exhibited by J. Gurney Fowler, Esq.

AWARD OF MERIT.

CaTTLeya Lepa (Percivaliana xX Dowiana aurea).—A very pretty
hybrid, with deep rose, moderate-sized flowers, and some, yellow veining in
the throat of the lip. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.

MANCHESTER & NoRTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

A meeting was held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on Thursday,
February 6th, when the members of Committee present were: Z. A.
Ward, Esq. (in the Chair), R. Ashworth, J. Bamber, J. Cypher, J. Evans,
A. Hanmer, Dr. Hartley, A. J. Keeling, J. Lupton, W. J. Morgan, C.
Parker, F. K. Sander, H. Thorp, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), staged a magnificent
group, composed principally of Lycastes and Cypripediums. Among the
former were L, Tunstillii, L. Imschootiana, and many choice varieties of L.
Skinneri, while the latter included many of the choicest winter-blooming
kinds, with a few seedlings raised at Bridge Hall. There were also two
nice plants of Cymbidium insigne. A Gold Medal was awarded to the
gardener for excellence.

Silver-gilt Medals were awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden. (gr.
Mr. Weatherby), and R. Ashworth, Esq., Northchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), for
very fine groups; the former.composed. principally of Se in
variety, the latter a more general group.

Marcu, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 97

A Large Silver Medal was awarded to A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
(gr. Mr. Dalgleish), for a fine group of Odontoglossums and Cypripediums
in variety, with Miltonia Bleuana.

Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr.
Mr. Lupton); S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr. Brown), and
Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, for good mixed groups.

A Bronze Medal was awarded to Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a small group of choice Cypripediums.

Interesting exhibits were also sent by H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn;
H. J. Bromielow, Esq., Rainhill (gr. Mr. Morgan); Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co., Haywards Heath; Mr. J. Evans, Congleton; Messrs. A. J.
Keeling & Sons, Bradford; Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, and Mr. W
Shackleton, Bradford.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Cypripedium King Ferdinand (Hera Euryades X Mrs. Mostyn), a fine,
well-shaped flower, very bright in colour. From S. Gratrix, Esq.

Odontoglossum Ceres var. Rossendale (Rossii x Rolfez), with large
flowers of good colour, and well spotted. From R. Ashworth, Esq.

AwarRps OF MERIT.

Odontoglossum Harlequin and O. eximium var. Ellis Markindale.
From S. Gratrix, Esq.

Cypripedium Wellesleye (Venus X insigne Harefield Hall var.). From
Rey. J. Crombleholme.

Odontoglossum Northern Star (Wilckeanum xX ?). From Z. A. Ward,

sq.

Odontioda Diana var. Fire King. From R. Ashworth, Esq.
Cymbidium Wiganianum (Tracyanum X eburneum). From H. Arthur,
Esq. :

BoTANICAL CERTIFICATE.
Bulbophyllum Dayanum. From Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.
THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F:.B.H-S.
Most of the Cypripediums of the insigne class and others of the winter-
bleoming section will now be ready for repotting, if it is necessary. Remove
the plants with care from their pots, shake off the old soil, and cut away all
roots and leaves which are dead. Several composts are used for these
Orchids, but I prefer a mixture of good yellow loam, mortar rubbish,
crushed crocks, and sphagnum moss. I do not consider osmunda fibre or
Peat are necessary for these terrestrial Orchids. The fresh pots should be
filled to two-thirds of their depth with clean broken crocks, and the soil
should be pressed firmly round the plants, taking care that the crowns are

98 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MARCH, 1913.

not buried under the. compost. One should endeavour, in potting
Cypripediums, to see that the base of the plant is always slightly above the
rim of the pot. Keep any newly-potted plants almost dry at the root for
several weeks, until it is seen that fresh roots are being emitted into the
new compost... Frequent syringing over the leaves will prevent the plants
from shrivelling. On bright sunny days it may be necessary to lower the
blinds for a few hours in the middle of the day, otherwise the sun might be
liable to scorch the leaves. It should be remembered that more shading is
required now than during the next and following months, for all Orchids
are at this time more subject to the various conditions of the weather, by
reason of having passed through the winter, which is a very trying season
for them.

As the days grow longer more water will be required. As previously
remarked, no set rules can be given with regard to the number of times any
Orchid should be watered, but the following may serve as a guide. Any
plants in full growth should receive a good dose every other day, whilst
those at rest should be given a small quantity about twice a week. Maintain
as far as possible an average temperature of 55°-60° Fahr. during the day, with
an optional drop of five degrees at night. It need hardly be remarked that
fire heat must be employed for maintaining the correct.amount of warmth
up till the beginning of next month, for on no account must the house be
shut up early in the afternoon with a view to keeping it warm enough
without the use of the fire.

OnciDIuMS.—The time has now arrived to repot the winter-flowering
Oncidiums, which comprise such well-known kinds as O. concolor,
crispum, divaricatum, dasytyle, fexuosum, Forbesii, Gardneri, incurvum,
ornithorhynchum, tigrinum, and varicosum. I am firmly convinced that
the deterioration of these plants may be effectually checked by annual
repotting, and the compost recommended consists of two parts osmunda
fibre to one of sphagnum moss, and a few oak leaves may be added with
advantage. The plants must be kept almost dry until fresh roots are
observed from the base of the bulb.

ODONTOGLOssuUMS.—Several members of this genus will be in flower
during this month. Having been asked several times for a selection of a
dozen hybrids of moderate cost, I would recommend the following:
Adrianz, ardentissimum, Clytie, Ceres, Fascinator, formosum, Hallio-
triumphans, Jasper, Lambeauianum, loochristiense, Rolfee, and warn-
hamense. For amateurs a very interesting speculation is the purchasing of
unknown seedlings of Odontoglossums. These frequently produce flowers
of wonderful colouring and good shape, whilst there is always the additional
attraction of blooming a new variety.

There are some Orchids which are entirely unsuitable fot cultivation in

Marcu, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 99

an amateur’s house, and a few words concerning these may be found
acceptable. On no account attempt to cultivate any Odontoglossums
which have the following for’ one of their parents: QO. Cervantesii,
hastilabium, Rossii, or Uroskinneri. Cymbidium Devonianum and elegans,
Cypripedium bellatulum, Charlesworthii, Godefroyz, and niveum are also
unsuitable for cultivation by amateurs.

CYMBIDIUMS.— Many of these will now be throwing up their flower
spikes, and should receive copious supplies of water every day, with an
occasional dose of weak liquid manure. The following are the best for
amateurs; C. eburneum, insigne, Lowianum, Tracyanum, tigrinum, and
Winnianum.

Next month I hope to describe the method of starting imported Orchids.

: OBITUARY.

Gust. H. MuLver-ABEKEN.—It is with great regret that we have to
announce the death, on February r1gth, after a long illness, of Herr Gustave
H. Miiller-Abeken, of Lange Voorhout, Den Haag, Holland, in his 48th
year. The deceased was a keen lover of Orchids, and the possessor of a
good collection, from which a number of interesting things have been sent
tous. Among them we recall the interesting Brassocattleya sandhaghensis
(B. Digbyana x C. Schilleriana), which was figured at page 241 of our 17th
volume, and C. Abekenie (Rothschildiana x Dowiana Rosita), which was
described at page 71 of our last issue. His name is commemorated in Cattleya
Muelleri, a beautiful white hybrid derived from C. intermedia alba and C,
Peetersiz. He has been a subscriber to the Orchid Review for the last
twelve years.

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.
Four interesting seedlings are sent from the collection of Dr. Hans
Goldschmidt, Essen-Ruhr, Germany, three of which have been raised by
himself, Leliocattleya callistoglossa x Lelia cinnabarina has. bright
yellow sepals and petals, with a tinge of salmon-colour, and a bright rose-
purple undulate lip, with narrow purple lines on the yellow disc. It is a
form of L.-c. Lowii (Orchid Stud-Book, p. 108). A seedling from Cattleya
Leopoldi x Lelia cinnabarina has narrow rosy sepals and petals, and a
three-lobed rich rose-purple lip with a white base. Dr. Goldschmidt
remarks that many plants of this cross are flowering, but not one of them
Show the yellow colour of the Lelia cinnabarina. It is a form of
L,-c. Diogenes (O.R., ix. p. 37), raised by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.,
from the reverse cross, in which the orange-yellow colour of the Lelia
parent predominated. Leeliocattleya Fournieri X callistoglossa has white
sepals and petals, strongly recalling those of Cattleya intermedia, one of

100 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Marcu, 1913.

the original grandparents, and the lip is somewhat three-lobed, and the
colour purple, with a yellowish throat and some narrow purple lines. All
these three were raised by Dr. Goldschmidt. The fourth is a brilliant
Sophrocatlelia of unknown parentage, which we fail to identify. The
shape of the flower indicates Lelia pumila very clearly, and we can only
suggest that it mav be a form of S.-c.-l. pumeximia. The sepals and petals
are broad, violet purple in colour, the lip entire, very undulate, much
darker than the petals, and the column white. It is a brilliant little flower,
and should be taken care of.

Three interesting Cypripediums are sent by Mr. Wm. Brooks, White-
cross Nurseries, Weston-super-Mare. One is a seedling from C. villosum
and C. exul, and is fairly intermediate between the two, with a well-blotched
dorsal sepal. It is known as C. villexul. One from C. insigne and C.
Germinyanum is a form of C. Chouvettii (Orchid Stud-Book, p. 144), and
has a much spotted dorsal sepal and some purple at the apex of the petals.
The third is a richly-coloured seedling of unknown parentage, though we
believe it to be a form of C. aureum, but deeper in colour than the original
form. It has more yellow on the dorsal sepal, while the petals, lip and
staminode are orange buff with a little warm brown shading. There are
many very minute brown dots at the base of the dorsal sepal and petals.

LIPARIS LACERATA.

Tuis brilliantly-coloured Liparis has just flowered in cultivation, a plant
which was imported from Borneo having flowered in the collection of the
Hon. N. C. Rothschild, Ashton Wold, Oundle. An inflorescence has been
sent to Kew. The species was originally met with on the Lamao River,
Borneo, by Burbidge, and was described from a drawing made by him
(Ridl. in Journ. Linn. Soc., xxii. p. 284). It was afterwards collected in
several localities in the Malay Peninsula, Perak, the Larut Hiils, Gunong
Raye, and the Lankawi Islands, while a specimen collected in Tenasserim
by Griffith has proved identical. It is allied to L. latifolia, Lindl., and
bears a graceful arching raceme of six to eight inches long, and very
numerous flowers, with buff coloured sepals and petals, and a bright red,
pandurate lip, which is strongly denticulate in front. It is one of the most
attractive species in the genus. R.A. R.

THE HYBRIDIST.
CYPRIPEDIUM BROADOAKSIENSIS.—This very charming hybrid is sent from
the collection of F. Wrigley, Esq., Broadoaks, Bury, by Mr. W.
Mickleraith, who states that it was derived from C. Hitchinsie x C.
Niobe. It is thus a combination of the four handsome green-leaved
species, C. insigne, Charlesworthii, Spicerianum and Fairrieanum, 1 nequal

Marcu, r913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. Tot

proportions, and a particularly happy one. The shape is excellent, the
dorsal sepal being 24 inches broad, very slightly concave, deeply channelled
up the centre, and reticulated and blotched all over with red purple on a
rosy lilac ground. The petals are 2 inch broad, by less than twice as long,
and the lip is short and broad, lined above and spotted below with reddish
purple on a light ground. The lip is short and broad, deep red-brown in
front, and the staminode is whitish with a bright yellow centre. In shape
the hybrid. is most comparable with GC. Charlesworthii, whence the rosy
ground colour is also derived, while the markings are as clearly derived
from C. Fairrieanum. It is a seedling flowering for the first time, and
should develop into a very handsome thing.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during March, on the
4th and 18th, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour,
12 o’clock noon. | The following meeting is fixed for April 1st.

Meetings of the Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will
be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on March 6th and 20th. The
Committee meets at noon, and exhibits are open to inspection from I to
4p.m. The following meeting is fixed for April 3rd.

The Garden, in its issue for February tst, under the. heading ‘‘ Workers
among the Flowers,” publishes a portrait of Major C. C. Hurst, F.L.S.,
Director of the Burbage Experimental Station, and co-Editor with Mr.
R. A. Rolfe, A.L.S., of the Orchid Stud-Book, a work which is described as
the only one of its kind ever compiled.

In the Report of the Council of the Royal Horticultural Society for the
past year reference is made to the removal of the Great May Show to
Chelsea in future. The Society has received much kindness from the
Master and Benchers of the Temple in being allowed for so long a time to
make use of their gardens, but for several years past the feeling of attach-
ment to the Temple Garden and dislike of the crowding have been
Struggling together for the mastery; and now that the International
Exhibition has proved that people will go to Chelsea, the Council have
unavoidably come to the conclusion that it is their bounden duty in the
interest of the vast majority of the Fellows to move the show in future to
Chelsea, which affords a site nearly three times as large as the Temple.
The Great May Show will accordingly be held on May 2oth, 21st and
22nd, 1913, on the site of and ina similar tent to last year’s International,
and the Council hope that. Fellows will individually invite and encourage
their friends to attend. ,

102 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MarcH, 1913.

The Autumn Orchid Show and Conference are also alluded to. Ten
years ago it would have been thought impossible to produce a Show of
Orchids at the beginning of the month of November. Certainly no one
would have dreamt of such a glorious display as was to be seen at the Hall
on the 5th of that month. The Hall was nearly filled with magnificent
exhibits, which not only spoke of wonderful cultural skill, but also strongly
emphasized the excellent work done by hybridists in bringing about such
an extended season of flowering, and the debt of gratitude due to them
from all lovers of flowers.

There is no mention of a repetition of the event, but in the Book of
Arrangements for the current year there is a notice under the usual
fortnightly meeting on November 4th that Orchid judging commences at
Io a.m., and the Orchid Committee meets half-an-hour later, which
suggests that Orchids will be a special feature at this meeting.

The Lecture Room of the Society has been equipped with the very
latest pattern of Epidiascope. It is constructed for ordinary lantern and
for microscopic slides, and also to throw enlarged reflections of actual
objects (flowers, insects, &c.) on to the screen. As regards objects to be
reflected, the apparatus cannot bring into equal focus those which are more
than one-eighth of an inch thick. When preparing specimens this fact
should be remembered, and sections made of a thickness not greater than
that mentioned. The operator can generally bring a flower into focus by
placing it under a piece of glass. The lighter in colour the object is, the
better the reflection. The apparatus has a water-cooling tank, so that no
danger exists to slides from scorching by the arc lamp.

R.H.S. ScrenTIFIC COMMITTEE.—The following references to Orchids
exhibited at meetings of the Committee are taken from the official report
(continued from page 39) :—

January 7th, 1913 :—

Apiopa St.-FuscienN.—Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath,
sent a hybrid between Ada aurantiaca and Cochlioda Neetzliana, with
narrow-petalled flowers of a deep red colour on a many-flowered raceme.
This cross was first shown at the International Horticultural Exhibition at
Chelsea by Mons. Graire, and it had been raised by Messrs. Charlesworth
simultaneously. The Committee unanimously recommended that Certificates
of Appreciation should be awarded to both M. Graire and Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co.

CYCNOCHES CoopERti.-—Messrs. Sander showed a plant under this name
which was thought by some to be identical with C. pentadactylon, but Mr.
Rolfe reports that, though very similar in structure to that species, it is

nd

MaRcH, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 103

quite different in colour, the sepals and petals being of a nearly uniform
mahogany-brown, and there are also some differences in the details of the
lip. It would, therefore, appear to be sufficiently distinct to warrant a new
name, and the Award of Merit recommended, subject to the name being
found correct, therefore stands.

EPIDENDRUM CILIARE X L#LIA CINNABARINA.— Mr. J. O’Brien showed
flowers of a hybrid between these two plants, pointing out that, though not
very conspicuous, the markings on the lip followed the remarkable fringing
of the Epidendrum parent, and the form of the lip was markedly elongated.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA X ODONTOGLOSSUM' CRISPUM.—At the
corresponding meeting last year M. Firmin Lambeau showed a seedling
of this cross, and the Committee requested that further plants of the same
raising should. be shown when the opportunity occurred. M. Lambeau now
sent two more plants bearing flowers very similar in appearance, and
leaving no doubt that the parentage stated originally was correct.

January 21st.: DENDROBIUM FUSCESCENS.—Mr. O’Brien showed a
specimen of this curious species with brown flowers from the Himalayan
region. It is figured in Griffith’s Ic. Pl. Asiat., t. 309, and belongs to the
section included by Lindley in his genus Sarcopodium (Fol. Orch.), along
with D. Coelogyne, D. amplum, and D. rotundatum. Lindley considered
the genus Sarcopodium intermediate between Dendrobium and Bulbo-
phyllum, but later botanists have divided it, putting some of the species in
Bulbophyllum and some in Dendrobium. It may be noted that the
technical descriptions published of the species describe two orange spots on
the column, but there are really three colours, one of them being quite
low down.

GHENT QUINQUENNIAL EXHIBITION.—The following British Orchidists
have been selected to act as members of the Jury at the coming Quin-
quennial Exhibition to be held at Ghent from April 26th to May 4th: Sir
Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Sir Harry J. Veitch, Sir Frederick W. Moore,
and Messrs. H. G. Alexander, de Barri Crawshay, C. H. Curtis, Stuart H.
Low, James O’Brien, H. T. Pitt, R. A. Rolfe, F. Sander, and Gurney
Wilson.

ORCHIS LONGIBRACTEATA.—In a note on ‘“‘ The Riviera Flower Season,”
Mr. H. Stuart Thompson remarks (Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 99) that in the
Hyeres district Orchis longibracteata was out in sheltered spots by the
marshes on January 21st. This handsome Orchid is very abundant in
certain places, and attains two feet in height later in the spring.

Mr. G. I’Anson.—Mr. G. I’Anson, who has been with Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co. for a number of years, has been presented with an oak cabinet

yO4 | THE ORCHID REVIEW. [MarcH, t913)

on leaving the firm. He has a long experience of Orchid culture, having
been previously with Messrs. Hugh Low & Co., and he would be
glad to hear from anyone requiring his services, either in a private or
trade collection.

We have received from Mr. Gosto Behary Seal, Calcutta, a photograph
of part of his plant house, including a number of interesting Orchids,
among which we can distinguish a fine example of Arachnanthe Lowii in
bloom, and some Cattleyas, and Phalznopsis, which are grown with palms
and other foliage plants.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

BRASSOLZLIA VAR. RIDOLPHIANA.—Bull. Soc. Tosc. Ort., 1913, p. 11,
with coloured plate. A white-flowered form of B.-l. Veitchii, raised from
Lelia purpurata X Brassavola Digbyana.

CC@LOGYNE CRISTATA, Lindl.—Bot. Mag., t. 8477.

CyMBIDIUM J. Davis.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 115, with fig.

CyMBIDIUM LowIANUM (a well-flowered specimen).—/Journ. Hort., 1913,
i. p. 131, with fig.

CyYPRIPEDIUM IpINA.—Gard. Chron., 1913, 1. p. 131, with fig.

La&:LIOCATTLEYA FIRMINII VAR. ARDENS.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 81, with
fig.

ODONTIODA MADELINE VAR. PRINCE OF ORANGE.- Gard, Chron., 1913,
1. p. 92, fig. 45.

ONCIDIUM CHEIROPHORUM.—Journ. Hort., 1912, ii. p. 591, with fig.

SOPHRONITIS GRANDIFLORA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 99, with fig.

—_+>0 <-—__
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

{Orchids ave named — a answered he “ as far as possible. Corresponden’s
requsedt to give the native try or parentage of plants sent. An ADDRESSED postcard must be
es reply by post is dissed tebe ad, ar postcards Gone be used). Subjects of special interest

tl dealt with in the body of the wo

H.T. P.—We wpeigotsy - gs thanks receipt of donations to the Frank Ashton
Relief Fund and also to t . W. Wilks’ Testimonial Fund, both of which have bern
frowarded to the proper posed

A.A.P.—Phalzenopsis Hebe, Rchb. f.

ee ee received with thanks.— Mrs. F.B.L. ; G.B.S.

qa: .W., next month

We suite veaesiea aes the Gardeners’ Chronicle Office a copy of The sia Note
Book, by Robert Woodward, jr. Its object is to enable horticulturists and others to keep
records of the behavior of the recent trees, &c., in their collections. ach pa ies is ane
vided with ruled spaces for the Name, Origin, Habitat, Soil, Situation, &c., with a spac
for notes of subsequent behavior. It is well adapted to the purpose, and sich seat
should be very useful for reference.

Catalogue received.—Messrs. Hassall & Co., Chase Side, Sere London, N.,
containing a large selection of species, varieties and hybrids, with prices

|

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

VoL. XXI.] APRIL, 1913: [No. 244.

OUR NOTE BOOK.

THE great event of the coming month. will be the Quinquennial
International Horticultural Exhibition to be held at Ghent from April
26th to May 4th. Ghent has long been famous for its Quinquennial
Exhibitions, but the one of 1913 forms part of a much larger Exhibition,
which will remain open for several months. The Horticultural Palace will
be a permanent building about a ‘third larger than the Crystal Palace, and
covers a site of seven acres, in the centre of the Town Park, an extent of
nearly ninety acres of well-wooded picturesque country. As already
announced, eighty-nine classes are devoted to Orchids, and a very fine show
is anticipated, in which Belgian, French, and German exhibitors, with
some of our leading nurserymen, will take part. Among. other interesting
classes we may mention that Gold Medals are offered for collections
demonstrating the favourable influence of symbiotic fungi in the germination
of Orchids, also to nurserymen for the greatest number of hybrids raised in
their establishment, together with their parents.

Apart from the constant stream of hybrids, several very interesting and
handsome Orchids have appeared at recent meetings of the R.H.S. On
March 4th a fine spike of Eulophiella Peetersiana, with seventeen flowers
and buds, was exhibited by Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., and a fortnight
later a plant of the original E. Elisabethz was staged in a choice group
shown by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., together with well-grown examples
of Phaius tuberculosus and simulans. It was interesting to see how distinct
the two latter are in habit and yet how closely they resemble each other
in the shape, colour, and markings of the flowers, a resemblance which
enabled one of them to masquerade under the name of the other undetected
for many years. It may be remembered what a discussion the appearance
of the original plant of Thouars caused on its appearance in gardens for the
first time some twelve years ago. We believe the plant was soon lost, and
the present one came from a new HS ae

The malicious destruction of a lot of valuable Orchids at Kew was.
105

106 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913+

reported at page 73, and we believe that nothing has been discovered about
the offenders. The following, however, appears in the report of a speech
by Mrs. Pankhurst, the ‘‘ militant’ leader, at the London Pavilion, on
February 10th: ‘‘ There were people who said it was wrong to destroy in a
single night choice flowers which had taken years to reach that pitch of
perfection, but how many lives were sacrificed in collecting the plants from
the swamps where they grew, and what a useless sacrifice that was as
compared with the great benefits which they hoped would come out of the
destruction of these Orchids at Kew? Was it not necessary for women to
do these things in order to call attention to the horrors that people had to
suffer in the production of these beautiful flowers?” We believe the
remarks of the producers of the destroyed Orchids were much more
appropriate to the occasion.

And there is another significant reference to the matter. The militant
leader has been arrested and committed for trial on a charge of having
feloniously counselled and procured certain persons, whose names are
unknown, to commit another outrage, and among the evidence produced
before the magistrates we find it reported that in a speech made at the
London Pavilion the accused spoke of the destroying of Orchid houses,
window-breaking, and cutting telegraph wires, and referred to herself as the
head and front of the movement, and as having, in many cases, incited
people to do these acts.

SowING ODONTIODA SEEDS.—With respect to the note on page 56, Mr.
R. Brooman White, Arddarroch, kindly advises our correspondent to sow
some of his Odontioda seeds on the compost of young seedling Odonto-
glossums. He finds nothing so successful, as the conditions suitable for
the latter are equally so for the Odontiodas. This, we believe, includes a
little extra warmth as compared with the established plants. The
experience of Mr. J. S. Moss (see page 115) is also interesting in this
connection.

GIFT OF ORCHIDS TO KEw.—We learn that Sir George Holford, on
being informed that a new Cattleya house had been built at Kew, generously
presented to the gardens a large number of species and hybrids from his
collection at Westonbirt. Included in the gift were many specimen plants
of Brassocattleyas, Leliocattleyas, and other hybrids, also a number
of hybrid Cypripediums and Cymbidiums. It will give some idea of the
value of the gift if we repeat what we were told by Mr. F. Sander, who had
seen the plants selected for Kew before they left Westonbirt. Questioned
as to their value, he stated that, if the plants had been purchased in the

Pec cies)

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 107

open market, they could not have been bought for less than £500. It is

particularly gratifying to find that the national collection of plants is not

overlooked by the great owners of private collections. Kew does much to
foster a love of horticulture among the people, and the gift of Sir George

Holford is certain to be greatly appreciated by the thousands who visit

those popular gardens.—Gardeners’ Chronicle.

—_—_—$«>-0<e———_
ORCHIDS: THEIR POPULARITY AND CULTURE,

A PAPER read by Mr. H. G. Alexander, Orchid grower to Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.
at a recent meeting of the Bath and District Gardeners’ Mutual Improvement
Association.

The cultivation of Orchids, commencing over a century-and-a-half ago,
has always been an extremely attractive subject, for in this tribe of plants
we have the most exquisitely curious and beautiful of all Nature’s
productions. The extraordinarily-formed flowers are rich in every shade
and blending of colour, some of which possess fantastic habits, yet always
elegant and often replete with the richest perfumes, or emitting the most
refreshing and delicate odours. Orchid growing was at one time looked
upon as exclusively the privilege of the few, and as a craze. This, like
‘many of the old ideas associated with the cultivation of these interesting
plants, was, as seen in the light of present-day knowledge, very extra-
ordinary. Formerly, there were several reasons which caused many who
admired them to hesitate before undertaking their cultivation. The high
price which nearly all the showy kinds commanded was in itself a serious
Matter, to say nothing about the uncertainty that existed as to their
‘growing after large sums had been spent in procuring them. In the early
‘days, Orchids, as soon as received, were consigned into houses wherein a
hot, steamy atmosphere without ventilation was maintained at all times, a
method adopted to imitate the damp, close jungle in which all tropical
‘Orchids were then supposed to have their home.

It was towards the middle of the nineteenth century that a change of
system in growing Orchids under artificial conditions was brought about by
Joseph Cooper and Donald Beaton, two of the ablest and most scientific
gardeners in this country in those days. These cultivators, grasping the
truth in the direction that more attention should be paid than hitherto
to the climatic conditions under which Orchids grow at the various altitudes
in the tropics, adopted their cultural treatment accordingly, by commencing
to keep a more reasonable temperature, and admitting fresh air into the
houses. Somewhere about the same time Mr. Paxton, afterwards Sir
Joseph Paxton, adopted a similar treatment, and an improved method of
Potting, with special regard to efficient drainage and extra attention to
Toot development. These were the chief deviations from the established

108 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913-

practice, and in them we see the approach to the cultural routine of the
present day. Another change that had an enormous influence on the
cultivation of all plants under glass, and contributed in no small degree to
the improvement and extension in the cultivation of Orchids, was the
heating of glass-houses by means of the hot-water system. Then followed
the modern plant house with the improved methods of ventilation and
means for the promotion of humidity.

How to popularize Orchid growing has for many years past occupied
the minds of those who have been associated with these plants. Neverthe-
less, one could scarcely expect much advance in this direction until a fair
idea of their modest needs became more common and widespread than
hitherto. For upwards of a quarter of a century there has been much
evidence as to the right and wrong methods of employing the various
necessities in connection with their culture, and I venture to say there is no
branch of modern horticulture that exhibits such wonderful progress as is
shown in the cultivation of Orchids. Their popularity to-day is greater
than any other class of plants that require to be grown under glass, and the
ranks of their admirers are ever increasing. Who will say that their
popularization is not still in its very infancy? The Royal Horticultural
Society, without doubt the leading society of its kind in the world, has
recently erected at Wisley a very large and elaborate structure for the
cultivation of Orchids. This fact alone is of sufficient evidence to one and
all of the popularity of Orchid growing, and of the greatest importance that.
every gardener must in these days have a good knowledge of their
cultivation. All students at Wisley thus have every facility for acquiring
proficiency in the art. The good and necessary example set by the Society
should encourage the forming of collections, large or small, and all
gardeners to study the nature of these plants in order that they may be:
fully prepared in case of necessity.

It is by no means necessary to have a complete range of greenhouses;
before embarking on Orchid culture. Anyone wishing to add grace to the
ordinary run of greenhouse plants will find one or two houses amply
sufficient to successfully grow a very large and representative collection of
beautiful Orchids. In forming a small collection, I always advise keeping
to the best known and easiest grown kinds, selecting them to suit the house
they are to be grown in. For example, it is useless to try to grow Cattleyas
and Odontoglossums under similar conditions. Both are of fairly easy
culture, and essentially Orchids for the small collector if arranged in 4
suitable house and temperature. If only one house is devoted to their
culture, I would always advise keeping this at an intermediate temperature,.
that is, a minimum winter temperature of 50 to 55 degrees by night and 55
to 60 degrees by day, these figures to rise in summer five degrees by

Apri, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 109

artificial heat, and rising up to 80 degrees when the sun is bright. In this
temperature it is possible to grow a great variety of Orchids, including
some of the showiest and most beautiful kinds in existence.

Taking into consideration the nature and general character of Orchids,
especially the epiphytal species, one does not wonder that to master the
essentials of their successful cultivation a longer time is required than is the
case of other plants. By this I mean that growers fail to recognise the
treatment necessary to enable them to keep their plants in a thriving state for
an indefinite period. It does not require more than an ordinary acquaintance
with Orchids to see by the character of their growth that Nature has made
a special provision for their continual existence. In the bulbous species
such as Cattleyas, Lzlias, Dendrobiums, Odontoglossums, Oncidiums,
Lycastes, and others, the roots which nourish the plant are confined to the
newly-made pseudobulbs, while the roots of the old back bulbs die after a
lapse of time, but the better the cultivation the slower the decay. The
advancing growth, however, suffers in no way by the death of these roots,
providing the old pseudobulbs they have been supporting are removed, for,
if allowed to remain, they have to be supported by the newer growth, which
naturally very seriously hinders the young bulb’s formation and maturation.
It is in this renewing of the tenure of life that Orchids differ from other
plants. The removing of the old pseudobulbs should be done during the
process of repotting, cutting them away from the last three or four leading
ones; any that are removed from rare and valuable kinds, will, providing
the eyes are sound, eventually start into growth, and, in due time, valuable
Stock is secured from material which, had it been allowed to remain, would
only have been detrimental to the parent plant.

In the bulbless species, Vandas, Aérides, Angrzecums, Saccolabiums,
and Phalznopsis, for example, the natural provision for their existence is
equally apparent the lower part of the stems, after the leaves and roots
they produced are decayed, die gradually upwards, but the upper part is
quite independent of the dead portion below, which has simply to be
removed to enable the plant and its source of nourishment to be again
brought in contact. This renewal of its existence is a peculiarity of this
type of plant. In evidence of this I may say there are at the present time
plants of Vanda, Aérides, and other distichous-leaved kinds in the
Westonbirt collection that have been growing there for over fifty years.

It is impossible to lay down any rules as the best for the culture of
Orchids. The plants are often found thriving under such very opposite
treatment, and as one cannot be certain that the conditions and
Surroundings are in all cases precisely similar, much more can be done by
Suggestions than by definite advice. I will, however, venture to say that
Observation and common sense are very important factors if combined with

110 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 19: 3-

that system of culture the nearest approach to Nature, which must be the
best, and most probable to lead to satisfactory results in the growing and
flowering of these plants. The cause of failure in not a few instances that
come under my notice is traceable to keeping too high a temperature.
Nothing is more injurious to the plants, and many would be far better in
cooler quarters than are often allowed. A very important matter is to
see that a lower temperature is kept at night than in the day, for nothing is
more injurious to plant life than high temperatures at night, nor is anything
more contrary to natural conditions. So sensitive are all plants, and
especially Orchids, to atmospheric influence, that no matter how well they
are treated in other ways, they cannot long continue in a satisfactory
condition of cultivation unless a proper atmosphere is maintained about
them. Orchids, with few exceptions, do not mind, but thoroughly enjoy
sun heat, if moisture and air are abundant, so long as they can obtain a
cool night air for their recuperation after the heat of the day.

The state of the atmosphere is without doubt of equal, if not more
importance, than the potting compost for the plants to root in—a condition
that not only applies to Orchids but to the majority of other plants. Light
is the very life of most plants, but it is Jess under our control than any
other factor. Possibly in no other cultural detail are Orchids, and many
other plants, so liable to be mismanaged as in respect to shading, and I
would urge all young growers to make a special point of grasping the full
value of this most essential element, light, for it is of the greatest
importance, and nearly all plants pine for it in our dull, sunless winters,
of which the present one is a melancholy example. The great influence
that light has upon Orchids will be seen in the plants grown in it, for not
only are these more free flowering, but the enduring properties of the
blooms are greatly increased, frequently to the extent of lasting twice as
long as others grown under more or less dense shade ; moreover, the plants
are hardier, so to speak, that is, they are not so susceptible to the effects of
slight errors of treatment in other ways.

In the case of those kinds that need a high temperature, with the ever-
accompanying moist conditions of the atmosphere, it is not always possible
to give them air in the amount received when growing naturally, but it is
possible to a considerable extent to make up for this deficiency by giving
the plants as much light as they will safely bear; for, with plants under
glass, light has a similar correcting influence over deficiency of air to that
which the presence of plenty of air has over inefficiency of light. I suppose
there are few engaged in Orchid cultivation to-day who have not noticed
during the past season the healthy vigour and growth of nearly all Orchids
that benefit by heat and sunshine—sure evidence of how very beneficial was
the hot weather of 1911, when during that rare and ideal summer we enjoyed

APRIL, 1913 | THE ORCHID REVIEW. Tit

in this country so many months of brilliant sunshine. I fear the season of
1g12 will not give us such satisfactory results. I will not suggest that
Orchids, except just a few, will bear full exposure to light, but the aim
should be to control it in keeping with the plants’ requirements. Shading
should be employed to break or diffuse the sun’s rays, instead of totally
obscuring them, as is so often the rule. Light, more than heat, is, in my
opinion, most necessary to harden the tissues and to give to the foliage
that robust and finished appearance so pleasant to the eye of all good
cultivators. (To be concluded.)
ORCHIDS AT WINTERSHILL HALL.

AN old-established and very interesting collection of Orchids which we have
just had the pleasure of seeing is that of John S. Moss, Esq., Wintershill
Hall, Bishops Waltham. Pleasantly situated on an eminence of about 400
feet above sea level, and withina dozen miles of the south coast, it possesses
the advantage of a clear breezy climate, with a complete absence of urban
fog, the result being visible in the health and vigour of the Orchids grown
there. Plenty of light, especially during the winter months, is a very
important factor in the successful culture of Odontoglossums.

Mr. Moss has long been an enthusiastic Orchidist, and if the collection
is not large it dates from a period of over thirty years ago. It is comprised
in four houses, though we saw a few Ccelogyne cristata alba in bloom in
another house, also two or three Cypripediums, the only ones in the
collection.

The Cattleya house is a three-quarter span of 50 feet by 15, witha
southern aspect, and heated by nine rows of hot water pipes. There are
top and bottom ventilators, and the shading consists of a single lath roller
blind, running on a frame situated about 15 inches above the glass. Most
of the plants are accommodated on the centre and side stages, but a few are
Suspended from the roof, especially a nice batch of Cattleya Dowiana aurea,
all selected extra fine varieties, which are in thriving condition. At this
Season very few Cattleyas are in bloom, but we noted a few forms of C.
Trianz, and a good C. Lueddemanniana with well shaped flowers. There
were also three plants of the distinct Brassavola glauca in bloom, a plant of
Leeliocattleya Haroldiana (L. tenebrosa X C. Hardyana), which came from
M. Pauwels, and two or three plants of a very free-flowering scarlet Epiden-
drum derived from E. Schomburgkii and E. radicans. The latter is some-
thing like E. O’Brienianum in habit, but scarcely as tall, and the flowers
show distinctly the character of E. Schomburgkii. We also noted Vanda
tricolor in bloom, and a plant of Zygopetalum Mackayi bearing a capsule as
the result of crossing with Odontoglossum Uroskinneri. This plant of
Zygopetalum has a remarkable history. It is the fourth generation of

412 THE ORCHID REVIEW. { APRIL, 1913.

Z.™Mackayi crossed with the pollen of Odontoglossum crispum, but in every
case the Zygopetalum has been reproduced pure and simple, this result being
clearly due to a kind of parthenogenesis, the Odontoglossum pollen causing
the ovules to develop without fertilisation being effected. Hybrids are not
expected on this occasion, but the capsule seems to be following the normal
course of development.

This house contains a good collection of Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas and
allies, and among hybrids raised in the collection were pointed out Cattleya
Mantinii, Brassocattleya Veitchii (with very short bulbs), and a number of
Brassavola Digbyana hybrids, which include seedlings from Cattleya
Dowiana aurea, C. Mendelii, C, Mossiz, Lelia purpurata and L. tenebrosa
as the other parent. There were also a few imported plants of Cattleya
Warscewiczii and C. Dowiana aurea mixed, which may possibly contain
examples of C. Hardyana. A plant of Vanilla planifolia is trained on a
wire beneath the roof, and is approaching flowering size.

The next is a small house originally put up for raising Cattleya seedlings
in, but Mr. Moss being now chiefly occupied with raising Odontoglossums
this house is occupied with other things. A little batch of Miltonia vexillaria
was growing with remarkable vigour, also a few plants of Epidendrum
vitellinum autumnale, a branching variety which was obtained from Messrs.
Mansell & Hatcher. Some plants of Vanda ccerulea were establishing them-
selves, and we also noticed a few Cymbidiums and a very strong seedling
‘Odontoglossum, raised from O. Edwardii and O. coronarium by Mr.
Armstrong, which should produce a very curious hybrid.

The Odontoglossum house is a span-roofed structure 40 feet long by 12
feet broad, running east and west, with side stages and a path down the
centre. lt is provided with top ventilation and shutters at the sides, and is
shaded on the south side with a lath roller blind fixed about 15 inches above
the roof glass. One noteworthy feature it possesses is that the sides and end
wall are built hollow, with cross ties here and there, and the air cavity pro-
vides a very efficient check against fluctuations in temperature. The house
is provided with two rows of piping on each side, and Mr. Moss believes in
a rather higher temperature for Odontoglossums than is sometimes given,
especially in the winter. He also finds that in this breezy situation the
ventilators have often to be used with great moderation to prevent an undue
loss of heat and moisture.

The house contains a select collection, a process of weeding out the
poorer and ordinary forms having been carried on for a long time, and we
noted some choice forms of Odontoglossum crispum and a lot of hybrids, a
number of which have been raised in the collection. Hybridisation has
been carried on for a considerable time, and we saw seedlings in every stage,
including a good number in flower, while capsules from some very promising

APRIL, 191 3.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 113

crosses are maturing. The plants generally are in thriving condition,
and some examples of remarkable vigour were pointed out. Mr. Moss does
not consider that seed bearing gives any appreciable check to strong well-
rooted plants, and he pointed out several that were bearing capsules and a

florescence, and also producing young growth at the same time.

strong in

Among plants in tlower we may first mention a strong example of the
beautiful O. crispum Mossiz, which appeared among some imported plants
some eight or nine years ago. The flowers are of excellent shape, and one
measured four inches across the petals. The segments are very broad, well
toothed, and bear very large, more or less confluent red-purple blotches,

the ground colour having a little rosy suffusion (see fig. 25). This plant is

OSSUM CRISPUM MOSSI.

Fig. 25. ODONTOG
being used by Mr. Moss for hybridising as often as possible, and it promises
to be an excellent parent. O.c. Rossendale was bearing a strong spike of
eleven flowers, measuring four inches across, the colour being white with a
large cinnamon-brown blotch on each segment—an excellent example of
good culture. O. c. Luciani is another gem now throwing up a spike.
Another form of O. crispum bore two spikes of fifteen flowers each. O.
Rossii and triumphans were also in bloom, with a very large plant of O.
luteopurpureum, which bore long spikes of twenty-five and seventeen
flowers, the latter the only plant of the species in the collection.

The hybrids in bloom were very interesting. O. illustre crossed with a

blotched crispum was represented by six plants, showing great variation in

114 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913-

colour and in the amount of blotching. Three forms of O. Maritana
(sceptrum X Rolfez) were also very different, one being light yellow with
‘small dark blotches, one yellow with heavy brown blotches, and the third
mostly brown with a few yellow markings. They came out of the same
capsule. An extreme case was seen in two seedlings from O. Queen
Alexandra x O. crispum Mossiz, where one seedling had light yellow
flowers with many red-brown blotches, and the other dark maroon-brown
sepals and petals, with a few whitish markings, and the base of the lip
heavily blotched with brown. <A few forms of O. Fascinator, derived from
O. Adriane X O. crispum Mossiz, were very interesting, one having large
white flowers very regularly blotched with red-brown, somewhat recalling
O. Adriane grandiflorum (O.R., xiii. p. 185, fig. 40), which we suspect is a
wild form of O. Fascinator. This plant was flowering from the first-made
bulb, and was producing two spikes, though under three years old from the
date of sowing the seed. The other had large blotches and would have
passed as a blotched crispum. OO. exultans (excellens xX crispum Mossiz)
had very round yellow flowers, well-blotched with red-brown. O. eximium
was producing a spike of five heavily-blotched: flowers, and a seedling
derived from a good O. crispum crossed with O. crispum Mossie, called
O. c. Kenchii, had a good round shape and very heavy purple blotching-
The number of heavily blotched seedlings in flower was remarkable, and
the almost entire absence of yellow was curious. Mr. Moss has only
bloomed during the present season one white unspotted seedling among
O. c. Mossiz crosses.

Some other interesting things were in bloom. Miltonia Harwoodii
Moss’s variety (M. vexillaria x C. Noetzliana) has fine magenta-rose
flowers, most like the Miltonia in shape. It is a young seedling flowering
for the first time, and a few days earlier had received an Award of Merit
from the R.H.S. Odontioda Mossiz (C. Noetzliana X O. maculatum) is a
very distinct hybrid which also received an A.M. at the same meeting. It
has bright rose-red sepals and petals and a somewhat three-lobed lip,
reddish buff in colour. A plant of O. Charlesworthii bore two racemes of
intense crimson flowers. There were two very diverse forms of O.
Bradshawiz from the same capsule, one bearing sixteen scarlet flowers, and
the other salmon-buff, as if the red had been bleached out. This was
called var. Prince of Orange. The parents were C. Neetzliana and a fine
blotched crispum. There was also a very fine scarlet Odontioda
Bradshawiz, very near the desired ‘‘ scarlet crispum,” in bloom, bearing
also a ripening capsule as the result of crossing with O. c. Mossie. We
noted also Lelia Jongheana and a good plant of Sophronitis grandiflora
in bloom. Among plants showing for flower we noted a fine specimen of
Odontoglossum nevium with fifteen spikes, and O. Wilckeanum X

APRIL, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 115

Edwardii with a large branched spike which has been developing for about
twelve months.

Among plants not in bloom were pointed out some seedlings of Odonto-
lossum Uroskinneri in thriving condition, some from O. maculatum X
escatorei; O. crispum Magali Sander, O. c. Britannia, O. c. Sherlock
Holmes, O. c. Queen
Marguerita, and a lot of
other choice things. O.
Jasper (fig. 26). 4s. a very

handso

y
i

—

e hybrid from O.
amabile and O. crispum,
which was purchased at
the Tankerville Sale, but
which was originally
raised by Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co. Mr. Moss
specialises largely In

blotched Odontoglossums

mAVUOOULLIO,

and it is from these that

most of his numerous
seedlings have been
derived.

A small house has been
erected for raising seed-
lings in, and the experi-
ment has been attended
with great success. Its

dimensions are fifteen feet

ong by twelve feet wide,
and it really forms an ex-
tension of the Odonto-
glossum house, with the
door at the other end.

i fag See ee 7 +
Chis is shaded only by a

] 1 oes ‘ ‘
‘ath roller bind, except in

the heat of summer when

Fig. 26. ODbONTOGLOSSUM JASPER.

a layer of tiffany is

stretched on the glass. Seedlings germinate here very freely, and the secret
of success Mr. Moss would express in the one word “climate.” ene
temperature is kept higher than in many collections, and he pointed out
that the thermometer then stood at 68° Fahr.—this in an afternoon in
March.

The seeds are sown on the compost of growing seedlings, t

116 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ApRIL, 1913.

newer the compost the better, in fact he usually sows the seeds
immediately the plants are potted. He also avoids the use of leaf-mould,
‘because it harbours the maggot of the fly that is so destructive to Odonto-
glossum seedlings. They may possibly germinate better with a little leat
mould in the compost, but his experience is that it is more than counter-
balanced by an increased loss of the seedlings, and he fumigates regularly
‘twice a week at seasons when the fly is troublesome. We noticed a lot of
Pinguicula caudata in flower, and remarked, jokingly, “‘ These are not
Orchids.” “No,” he replied, ‘‘ they are fly catchers,” and then came the
information above given. The identity of this fly is apparently not known,
but Mr. Moss believes it lives naturally in decaying leaves anywhere, and 1s
brought with the compost into the house, where it becomes troublesome.
We handled many pots on which the young seedlings were germinating
freely, in various stages, and we saw also an experiment that is being tried
of sowing the seeds on canvas, as in the case of Cattleyas, the pots being
covered with a piece of cardboard. They appeared to be germinating
freely, but it is a question whether this method would give light enough, in
which case a piece of glass might be tried.

As soon as the young seedlings can be handled they are pricked off and
placed under a hand light until established, there being several glass cases
in the house for this purpose. Many interesting crosses were pointed out,
including Odontioda Charlesworthii crossed with O. crispo-Harryanum,
with O. Pescatorei, and with blotched and white forms of O. crispum ;
Cochlioda Neetzliana crossed with Odontoglossum Rolfee ; O. Uroskinneri
crossed with C. Neetzliana, this being the solitary instance in which this
Cochlioda has been used as the pollen parent. Generally the capsule
begins to develop and then goes off. Odontoglossum maculatum has been
successfully used on several occasions. Odontioda Mossiz has just been
mentioned, and Mr. Moss has flowered O. maculatum x Pescatorei, an
interesting cross though not of much value, and seedlings were pointed out
of O. maculatum crossed with both O. Uroskinneri and O. Vuylstekei. O.
Hallio-crispum X madrense is represented by a good-sized plant, and we
noted also O. mirificum xX crispum Mossie, O. nevium x crispum, and a
batch of O. Ossulstonii. O. Adrianz x Pescatorei was in bloom, but was
an ordinary form, with large dark blotches on the sepals.

Mr. Moss has a very able lieutenant in the person of Mr. Kench, a keen
cultivator, who has long presided over the various departments of an
interesting general garden, where Orchids may be regarded as first
favourites. Mr. Kench is a keen hybridist, and has a careful record of all
the crosses made, which Mr. Moss posts up into a book when the seedlings
are pricked off, and thus there isa complete record of everything raised in the
collection. Mr. Kench could probably relate some interesting experiences,

peeks:

APRIL, £913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 117

for the work has been in hand a good many years, and the present success:
is the result of keen powers of observation and a good many experiments,
with doubtless the usual crop of failures. One matter on which the
evidence is conflicting is as to the development of the fungus said to be
necessary for the germination of Orchid seedlings, but Mr. Kench has an
idea that the spores are present in the Odontoglossum seed pod, and that
they germinate with the young seedlings when the conditions are right-.
Healso thinks that the fungus may develop when the seeds themselves are
not fertile, in which case one might have the fungus without any Orchid.
seedlings. It would be a very interesting matter to know how far this
fungus is subject to cultural control. One practical point, however, comes:
out of the experiments that have been made, namely, that no seed-bed is
equal to that of a young growing seedling.

Mr. Moss has long found Orchid growing a delightful hobby, and we
may congratulate him and his able gardener on the excellent condition of
the collection, and also express the hope that the fascinating work of
hybridising Odontoglossums and the allied genera, to which attention is
new being specially devoted, will be attended with further success. We
shall hope to hear of the progress of some of the promising crosses already
mentioned.

ORCHIDS AT EWHURST, SUSSEX.

THE collection of Orchids formed by T. Daws, Esq., J.P., is a very
representative one, and contains many features of interest. It may be
described as essentially an amateur’s collection, for the services of a skilled
grower are not requisitioned, Mr. Daws himself undertaking such important
matters as watering and potting. One thing which impresses itself upon
an observer is the number of different genera which are successfully grown
side by side, and this affords ample proof that every item in their culture
has been mastered, and the general excellent health possessed by all the
plants testifies to how well they are grown.

At the time of writing, Dendrobiums are making a fine display, those in
bloom comprising many plants of D. nobile, Wardianum, Rolfe, Juno,
nobile, and nobile Cooksonianum, one plant of the latter carrying thirty-seven
of its curiously marked blossoms. Besides being heavily-laden with bloom,
one plant of D. Rolfez has a new growth over three feet in length, and
this should afford a grand display next season. Cypripediums are now
mostly over, but there are still a few Calypso, insigne, Leeanum superbum,.
Acteus, and some Selenipediums out, including a plant of the rather
rare S. Schroeder. Several unnamed seedling Odontoglossums are
throwing up their flower spikes, and a good plant of O. Vuylstekez has
just passed out of bloom. Odontiodas are well represented, comprising.

118 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913.

well-grown plants of Bradshawiz, Charlesworthii, grata, Lutetia, and
Vuylstekez.
- Oncidium tigrinum, with a spike of forty-seven blooms, is a very
conspicuous object, whilst Miltonia cuneata is carrying five flower spikes,
and a healthy pod of Miltonia spectabilis crossed with Oncidium is
approaching ripeness. Two pods of Oncidium maculatum crossed with
Odontoglossum Vuylstekez are swelling well. Several other Oncidiums,
with Epidendrums and Calanthes, are in bloom, whilst a large collection of
‘Cattleyas and their hybrids are growing well, and emitting plenty of roots.
-One plant calls for special mention ; it is Cattleya citrina, with seven perfect
leads. Should they all flower the plant will prove a splendid attraction.
From the above short notes it will be seen that a very varied collection
is possessed, and Mr. Daws must be congratulated on the remarkable
health and vigour of all the Orchids. C. ALwyn HARRISON.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
Now that the sun is gaining in power, and that warmer weather is
experienced, more shading and an increased amount of ventilation will be
needed. The blind should be lowered as soon as the rays of the sun fall
directly on the roof glass, and it should be left down until all fear of the
plants being scorched is removed. Personally, for the purpose of shading,
T prefer a blind made of scrim or tiffany to one of wood laths, as a more
even shade is afforded by the use of the former.

Air can now usually be admitted through the top as well as the bottom
ventilators, and from now to the close of autumn the house should always
have a free current of air passing through, and on warm nights a little
ventilation may now be safely given. The following is a sure test as to
whether the atmosphere of the house is sufficiently ventilated for the well-
being of the inmates. On entering, does it feel conducive to a lengthy
stay or is it such that one feels stifled? If the latter, then it is at once
apparent that there is too little ventilation.

The following figures may serve as a rough guide to the temperatures
required this month :

By day, 55°-65° Fahr.

At night, 50°-60° Fahr.

Providing that an average of 55° Fahr. can be maintained at night without
perforce closing the house unduly early in the afternoon to retain the heat,
a fire is no longer necessary.

Plants will require watering more or less as advised last month, but
much has to be left to the good judgment of the grower, for climatic
conditions vary in different parts of the country, and moreover Orchid

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 11g

houses, ever in the same locality, vary considerably in their power of
retaining moisture. As regards damping down I like to do this about 9.30
a.m., before the shading is lowered, thoroughly wetting the path, staging,
pots, and earth underneath. If handy, this operation can be more quickly
and effectively performed if a hose with a fine spray is used than by mere
syringing. Damping should be done again about three p.m., when the
blind is raised, and this time the plants themselves may receive a slight
sprinkling. Be careful to use only rain water for application to the plants,
and probably for the spraying of the Orchids a fine syringe will be best.

Cymbidiums Lowianum and Tracyanum will probably be opening their
buds, and considering that, if kept cool and dry, the blooms will remain
eight to ten weeks in perfection, they are without doubt some of the best
for amateurs’ collections. Lycaste Skinneri, also, should be in bloom
during this month, and its fleshy pink flowers possess long lasting qualities.
‘Care must be taken to prevent any water from touching the blossoms,
or they will immediately become spotted with brown, and be disfigured.

This is a suitable season for procuring any imported Cool house
Orchids, as many cases of them arrive during this month. As soon as any
plants are received, pot them up singly in pots small in proportion to their
size, and only in crocks. Give only enough water to prevent the bulbs
from shrivelling, but damp surroundings are necessary. After several
‘weeks young roots will be seen to be forming, and then the plants should
be repotted as practised for established Orchids, and treated accordingly,
with perhaps a slight increase in the amount of crocks employed, and a
small decrease in the supply of water.

SUGGESTED ADDITIONS.

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM.—This is a magnificent secondary hybrid
raised from O. crispum and ardentissimum, which is a robust-growing
plant, and produces in the spring months a long flower spike, bearing large
well-shaped blooms, the sepals and petals of which are white, more or less
Spotted with reddish brown, whilst the lip is similarly coloured, and has a
beautiful yellow crest. It has been in existence several years, and healthy
Seedlings, which would blossom from their next bulb, can be procured at a
Teasonable price.

INCONSTANCY OF UNIT-CHARACTERS.—To the mutationist unit-characters
are as changeless as atoms and as uniform as the capacity of a quart
Measure. . . . Actual unit characters are modifiable under selection ;
only one blindly devoted to a contrary theory will be able long to shut his
yes to this fact. For several years I have been engaged in attempts to
modify unit-characters of various sorts by selection and in every case I have

Met with success.—CASTLE.

120 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913-

ANGRAECUM EICHLERIANUM.
Tuis distinct and striking Angraecum has been known for upwards of thirty
years, having originally flowered in the Royal Botanic Garden, Berlin, in
1882, when it was described and figured by Dr. Kranzlin (Berl. Gart. Zeitt.,
1882, p. 434, fig. 102). It is said to have been introduced from Lunda,
near Kassamba, in the gorges of the Loango River. Afterwards it was
sent from the South Cameroons by Braun. For some years it remained
rare, but in 1898 drawings of an Angrecum from Old Calabar, Nigeria,
were sent to Kew by Mr. J. H. Holland, Superintendent of the Botanic
Gardens, Old Calabar, and proved identical. They were accompanied by

living plants, which flowered in 1goo, and the species was soon afterwards

Fig. 27. ANGRECUM EICHLERIANUM.

figured in the Botanical Magazine (t. 7813). In 1896a plant that had been
introduced from the Congo by M. S. Bieler flowered in the Brussels
Botanic Garden, and was described and figured under the name ol
Angrecum Arnoldianum (De Wildem. in Trib. Hort., i. p. 83, t. 6), but

J
proved identical with A. Ejichlerianum. The plant here figured 1s
reproduced from a photograph Maen by Mr. E. Miethe in the Palmengarten

Frankfurt, last July. The species has erect stems, bearing numerous aéria!

roots, ovate-oblong, somewhat bilobed leaves, and axillary one- or two-
flowered racemes of large light green and white flowers. The three spott 1
leaves belong to an Aroid (Scindapsus pictus) that was growing behind.

>

APRIL, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 121

KEW NOTES.
SOME very interesting Orchids are flowering at Kew, but the houses are
temporarily closed to the public on account of the recent suffragette
outrages. The plant of Eulophiella Elisabethe is in robust condition and
bearing five spikes. It requires warm house treatment, and an abundance
of moisture during the growing season. Eria hyacinthoides is a Javan
species, and very effective when well grown. It now bears thirty-four
spikes of pure white flowers. Megaclinium Bufo is a curious plant which
was described by Lindley over seventy years ago, and soon lost sight of, but
was recently re-introduced by Mr. J. Anderson from the Gold Coast, with
M. eburneum in the same clump. Cirrhopetalum campanulatum is a
charming little plant in a five-inch pan, and bearing tive of its elegant umbels

Fig. 28. CIRRHOPETALUM CAMPANULATUM.

of purple-rose flowers. It has more than doubled in size since the annexed
photograph (fig. 27) was taken three years ago, and has frequently flowered
since. The remarkable viscous secretion which exudes from the flowers
may be seen in the figure, in hanging drops at the end of the sepals.
Physosiphon Lindleyi, grown in a six-inch pan, is bearing twenty-
eight spikes of orange-red flowers, which remain long in_ perfection.
Odontioda heatonensis is a gem, bearing seven beautiful spikes. Sarcochilus
Fitzgeraldii and S. Hartmannii are also flowering well, together with the
handsome Aérides Houlletianum, Dendrobium teretifolium, and a lot of
Other showy Dendrobiums, species and hybrids.

122 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913.

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR APRIL.
By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.

THE outside conditions are now more favourable for the plants grown under
glass, and the greater amount of light we have recently experienced has had
a most stimulating effect upon all Orchids. It is astonishing the influence
light has upon the plants at this season of the year, how it apparently
stiffens up the limp and flaccid growths. Everything now will be on the
move; new roots are pushing, together with new growths, and things in
general will move very rapidly, and where large quantities of Orchids are
grown some amount of forethought and energy will be necessary to keep
pace with the times, as regards repotting and other details. :

TEMPERATURES.—The increased temperatures advised last month may
continue now right through the growing season, an exception, of course,
being made in the case of the Cool house, which should be kept as cool as
possible during the summer months. Artificial heat should be discontinued
here as early as possible, as fire heat is of no benefit to these plants, and
should only be used to maintain the temperatures at the proper figures.

WATERING.—The plants will now begin to take up more water at the
roots, and with the longer and brighter days evaporation will take place
rapidly, therefore more water should be given to the plants and the supplies
of atmospheric moisture should be increased. The more humid conditions
will be conducive to healthy growth, but excess in either case must be
strictly guarded against.

VENTILATION must have attention at all times, and I am certain if this
question had more attention we should not see so many Orchids in such a
bad condition as we often do. The proper proportions of heat, air, and
water are the main factors in the cultivation of garden plants, and Orchids
are no exception to the rule. Stuffiness should not be allowed in any of
the divisions, but the usual precaution against draughts must be observed.

SHADING will now require attention, and it will be well to repeat the
advice concerning the benefits of shading Orchids during early spring. It
is well to remember that when emerging from the dull weather of winter
the plants are somewhat soft, and the growths are limp and flaccid, and
such growths therefore are unable to withstand sudden or long spells of
bright sunshine. The plants should be gradually inured to the light and
sun, as by neglecting to shade them at this season much harm may accrue,
and many plants may be disfigured for several seasons.

DENDRoBIUMS.—As the species and hybrids pass out of flower, and
commence to push forth new growths and roots from the base of their
_pseudobulbs, any necessary repotting should be attended to. The
disturbance of plants well established in good material should be avoided,

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 123

and only the loose, sour, and decomposed compost should be picked out
with as little disturbance as possible. Well-drained pots, pans, or baskets
are suitable receptacles for these plants, and the potting compost should
consist of equal portions of peat, polypodium and osmunda fibres, and
sphagnum moss. Pot the plants moderately firmly, keeping the base of
each plant slightly below the rim of the receptacles. During the early
stages of growth only sufficient water should be given to keep the plant
plump and the rooting material moist, but when the roots enter the new
material more liberal supplies may be given. From the time that the
plants are established until their pseudobulbs are fully developed a hot,
moist buoyant atmosphere is necessary. The plants delight in a clear light,
but at the present time, owing to their being repotted, shading is necessary.
Young seedling Dendrobiums may also be repotted at this season. The
usual methods of propagation, by cutting the bulbs into lengths and sticking
them into pots of clean sand, or laying them upon growing sphagnum moss
may be practiced.

MiLtTonias.—Plants of Miltonia vexillaria and its hybrids that are
pushing up their flower spikes must not be allowed to suffer for the want of
water at the roots, but a moderately dry atmosphere must be maintained,
or there is a danger of the flowers becoming spotted. When the flowers
are opened under cool conditions, as advised last month, they are of a much
better colour, and last longer in bloom.

CaTTLeyas, Laxias, and L&@LIOCATTLEYAS.—Any necessary repotting

must be attended to when these plants have passed out of bloom and are
making new roots. There will be quite a number of the hybrids as well as
some of the species, which will arrive at the proper stage during the present
month, and it is wise to carefully note the plants so that they may be done
before the roots attain any great length, when there is less danger of their
getting broken or injured. If this routine is carried on systematically each
One will get attention in its proper season, and many Cattleyas resent
disturbance at the roots at any other time. Cattleya gigas, C. aurea, and
their hybrids are now starting vigorously into growth, and must be carefully
watered until the growths get nicely away, when they may have more
liberal supplies. They should all be placed in the warmest position in the
Cattleya house. Lelia anceps that are in need of repotting should be
completed at once, as they.delight in a long season of growth, and if left
too late they often fail to re-establish themselves.

Lycastes.—Plants of this genus, species or hybrids, will develop new
growths as they pass out of flower, and any that are in need of new rooting
material should be repotted. Specimens that are potbound should be given
larger pots, sufficiently large to acommodate them for at least two seasons.
Plants that have lost their roots, from a too liberal supply of water or from

124 THE ORCHID REVIEW. {APRIL, 1913

any other cause, should be carefully shaken out and placed in pots just
large enough to hold them. Dead and decayed roots should be removed.
Lycastes succeed in a similar compost to the green-leaved Cypripediums.

Puatus.—The species and hybrids of this genus will also require
attention at this season as regards repotting. They succeed in a similar
compost to that advised for Lycastes. Owing to the large quantity of
water required at the roots when in full growth, it is essential that the pots
should be well drained. With the exception of P. tuberculosus, which
delights in a high temperature, an intermediate temperature will answer
their requirements.

SPATHOGLOTTIS.—These useful Orchids also succeed in a_ similar
compost to the two preceding genera, and will now need attention as
regards repotting. The plants require the temperature of the warmest
house, and must not be exposed to strong sunshine at any time. When in
full growth they require liberal supplies of water at the roots, and frequent
spraying on the undersides of the leaves, to prevent attacks of red spider
and other pests.

CaTASETUMS, CyCNOCHES, and MormMopeEs.—As the young growths of
these quaint and fascinating Orchids are seen to be pushing from the base
of the pseudobulbs they should be repotted. They require this attention
annually, and succeed in a similar compost to Cattleyas. The pots must
be well drained, and the plants potted moderately firmly. The pseudobulbs
should be made secure, as, being heavy, they easily sway about, and if this
is allowed they cannot establish themselves properly. No water must be
given to the plants for some considerable time, as should the compost
become wet from any cause there is a danger of the young growths
decaying. The plants like a light position in the warmest house when in
active growth, and should be rested in the same way as Dendrobiums.

C@LOGYNE CRISTATA, as the plants commence to make new growths,
may be repotted. Those that are in good condition should not be
disturbed, as no Orchid resents being pulled to pieces more than this, and
after being disturbed it often shrivels much. Where a considerable stock
of this old favourite is grown it is desirable to repot a few plants each year,
as they seldom flower satisfactorily the first year after being disturbed, in
fact it is the best practice to remove any flower spikes which appear that
season. A compost similar to that used for the green-leaved Cypripediums
will answer their requirements. Any other Ccelogynes that have passed
out of bloom and are making new growths may also have attention. The
sweet-scented C. sparsa must not be overburdened with compost about its
roots. The majority of these plants delight in an Intermediate house
temperature during the summer months, and when well established and in
full growth, an abundant supply of water at the roots.

Apri, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 126

ANGULOAs that are pushing up their flower spikes are best potted directly
the flowers fade. Use a similar compost to that advised for Coelogynes. They
are best grown in pots, which must be well drained, in fact no Orchid will
succeed in a badly-drained compost. These plants grow best in a light
position in the Intermediate house. They must be sparingly watered after
repotting, but when well established a liberal supply should be given. No
moisture should be allowed to remain in the centres of the young growths.

MAXILLARIAS.—Those species of Maxiliaria which flowered during the
winter months, and are now becoming active at the roots, should be repotted
ifin need of fresh rooting material. These plants will succeed either in
pots, pans, or baskets, and a compost comprised of equal parts of peat,
polypodium and osmunda fibres, and sphagnum moss will answer their
requirements. After being disturbed they should be placed in a shady
position, and watered caretully for some time. M. Sanderiana and others
that flower at this season should not be potted until their flowering period
is over. All these species will succeed either at the warm end of the Cool
house, or the Cool end of the Intermediate house.

AERIDES, SACCOLABIUMS, and ANGR&CUMS that require new compost
should have attention at once, as with the more favourable conditions of
growth they will push roots rapidly. Plants of similar character that are
inmates of the East Indian house may also have attention, should they be
in need of it. A suitable compost for this class of plants is made up of
equal portions of osmunda fibre and sphagnum moss, cut up moderately
finely and mixed well together.

ONcIpIUMs.—Those Oncidiums which flower during the winter months
will now be starting into growth, and if in need of fresh rooting material
may have attention whenever new roots are seen to be pushing from the
base of the new growths. - Oncidiums succeed in a similar compost to
Odontoglossums, but they may have a more liberal supply of half-decayed
Oak leaves given them. Those that are now developing flower spikes may
have water afforded them whenever they become dry.

ODonTOGLossuM ciTROsMUM.—As the flower spikes are observed to be
pushing from the centres of the young growths, they may have slightly
more water at the roots. As soon as the flowers are over the plants may
be given new rooting materials, should they be in need of it. Not being a
Strong rooting subject, the receptacles should not be over large. They will
Succeed either in pans or baskets in a light position in an Intermediate
house. The usual Odontoglossum compost will answer their requirements.

GENERAL REMARKS.—We have again reached the busy season, and, like
our plants, must become active, as Nature is exacting in her demands, and
unless each plant receives its exact requirements at the proper time, the

t results cannot be looked for. This, in practice, may be hard to

126 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ApriL, 1913.

achieve, but those who do their best at least deserve success. All insect
and other pests, which at this season especially may do irreparable harm,
must be diligently searched for and eradicated. A clean start means, in
most cases, a clean ending.

SOCIETIES.
RoyAL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held in the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on March 4th, when there was a fine display of Orchids, and
the awards consisted of four medals, one First-class Certificate, six Awards
of Merit and two Cultural Commendations.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
and Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Sir Harry J. Veitch, Sir Jeremiah
Colman, Bart., J. S. Moss, Stuart Low, Gurney Wilson, F. Sander, R. G.
Thwaites, F. J. Hanbury, F. M. Ogilvie, T. Armstrong, A. McBean, W.
Cobb, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, W. P. Bound, J. E.
Shill, H. G. Alexander, W. Bolton, de Barri Crawshay, W. H. White, A.
Dye, S. W. Flory, and C. Cookson.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
staged an interesting group of rare species, including the handsome
Zygopetalum rostratum, Acanthophippium bicolor, Bulbophyllum _bar-
bigerum, Pleurothallis Grobyi, Cirrhopetalum picturatum, Dendrobium
fusiforme with six racemes, and others.

Walter Cobb, Esq., Normanhurst, Rusper (gr. Mr. Salter), sent the
handsome Odontoglossum Lawrenceanum Cobb’s var., with very large
flowers, a fine Odontioda Bradshawiz, O. Cooksoniz The Gem and Cobb’s
var., and Sophronitis grandiflora Cobb’s var.

Mrs. Norman Cookson, Oakwood, Wylam (gr. Mr. H. J. Chapman);
sent a very fine form of Odontioda Bradshawie with a spike of thirteen
flowers.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, showed fine forms of
Odontioda Bradshawiz, Charlesworthii, and Zephyr, Odontoglossum
Twyford Gem (Rossii rubescens X formosum), a very pretty hybrid, having
the sepals and petals spotted with dark red and the lip bright rose-
purple, and Brassocattleya Dora (C. Trianz alba x B.-c. Veitchii Queen
Alexandra), a very promising white flower with a greenish tinge on the
sepals and lip.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent Odonto-
glossum percultum var. Mrs. Goodson, a handsome variety, O. armain-
villierense, and O. Captain Humphrey, of unrecorded parentage, but
apparently partly derived from O. Uroskinneri.

M. H. Graire, Amiens, France, sent ee eee Saturne

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 127

(nebulosum Xx Harryano-crispum) a blush white flower, spotted with
brown, and most like the former in character.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent
a fine spike of Eulophiella Peetersiana with seventeen flowers and buds,
which had been in flower for the last month.

F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr. Balmforth), sent
the handsome Odontoglossum Harwoodii Shrubbery var., and Odontioda
Charlesworthii Shrubbery var., a very fine richly-coloured form.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent
Sophrocatlelia Marathon Ashtead Park var., a handsome rose-purple
flower, with claret-coloured front lobe to the lip.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a very fine group, including
some good Dendrobiums and Odontoglossums, noteworthy among the
latter being O. princeps (O. crispum Luciani x Lawrenceanum), a hand-
somely-blotched flower, O. Thompsonianum, Renanthera Imschootiana,
Cattleya Parthenia Prince of Wales, some fine C. Trianz, Brassocattleya
Maroniz, Odontioda Bradshawiz, Lycaste gigantea, and other good things
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a group of choice’
Orchids, including the rare and handsome Phaius simulans with three
spikes, Sarcochilus Hartmanni with eight spikes, and S. Fitzgeraldi with
five spikes, several well-flowered plants of the charming Angreecum citratum,
Cattleya Trianz Backhouseana, good forms of Odontoglossum Jasper, O.
Elaine, and Odontonia Cybele (O. cirrhosum xX Miltonia candida), a
remarkable hybrid, having lanceolate sepals and petals, white blotched
with chestnut red, and the lip ovate, acuminate and crisped, the column
white, with some red markings at the base, and some similar blotches in
front of the crest (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a good group, including
some good Cattleya Trianz, white and coloured forms of Lycaste Skinneri,
Angreecum sesquipedale, the brilliant Sophronitis grandiflora, Dendrobium
nobile virginale, D. Findlayanum, and others, Masdevallia Hincksiana, M.
caudata, &c. (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, saga a pretty group,
including Cattleya Suzannae Hye de Crom, some good C. Trianz, the
variety Painted Lady having broad purple handsome petals, the rare D.
linguzeforme, Coelogyne pandurata, Ansellia africana, Cypripediums, &c.
(Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, sent a good form of
Dendrobium Sybil, raised from D. crassinode and D. Linawianum. The
Original record was D. Linawianum xX bigibbum, but the latter has long
been suspected, and now proves erroneous.

128 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ApRIL, 1913.

Messrs: Hassall & Co., Southgate, sent Brassocattleya Veitchii Queen
Alexandra, a good B.-c. Menda, a fine white Odontoglossum crispum, and
a few hybrid Odontoglossums.

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, sent a good form of ee Schroederze
and a selection of C. Triane.

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent Odontioda St, Fuscien,
and a fine Cattleya Tityus var. Excelsior (Enid X Octave Doin).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, showed a fine plant of
Eulophiella Elisabethz with two spikes of flowers.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM ALPHA.—A large and remarkably handsome
form, having the flowers closely blotched with claret red, with only the
margins and some narrow lines between the blotches white. Exhibited by
Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA TRIANZ CoLossaL.—A remarkably large and handsome form
having broad rose-purple sepals and petals, and the much crisped lip claret
purple in front of the orange disc. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L.
Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

DENDROBIUM BIGIBBUM LaDy CoLMAN.—A charming blush white variety.
Exhibited by Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

LALIOCATTLEYA SMILAX PRINCE OF ORANGE (L.-c. Charlesworthii x C.
Enid).—A handsome form, having deep orange-coloured flowers, with the
front lobe of the lip claret. Exhibited by Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean.

MiLttoniopA Harwoopir Moss’s_ var. (C. Neetzliana x Miltonia
vexillaria)—A very fine form, having the flowers deep magenta-rose in
colour. Exhibited by J. S. Moss, Esq., Wintershill Hall, Bishops Waltham
(gr. Mr. Kench).

Opontiopa Mossi# (C. Neetzliana X Odontoglossum maculatum).—A
very distinct hybrid, having broad magenta-rose sepals and petals, and
an expanded three-lobed lip, salmon buff in colour. Exhibited by J. 5.
Moss, Esq.

ONCIDIODA COOKSONIE RALLI’s vAR. (C. Noetzliana x Oncidium macran-
thum).—A richly-coloured form, having broad, reddish orange flowers, with
a yellow apex to the lip. Exhibited by Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

CaLOGYNE PANDURATA.—To Mr. J. E. Shill, Sitiones to Baron Bruno
Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green, for a fine specimen, bearing two
spikes of its large green and black flowers.

SOPHROLZLIA PsycHE.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to Sit
Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., for a well-grown plant with about sixty
flowers.

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 129

At the meeting held on March 18th there was again a fine display, and
the awards consisted of six medals, one First-class Certificate, four Awards
of Merit, and two Cultural Commendations.

_ Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair),
J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), R. A. Rolfe, Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., J. Wilson
Potter, F. Sander, R. G. Thwaites, F. M. Ogilvie, F. J. Hanbury, T.
Armstrong, A. McBean, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, ye By
Shill, H. G. Alexander, A. Dye, W. H. White, S. W. Flory, C. J. Lucas,
W. Bolton, J. S, Moss, de Barri Crawshay, and Gurney Wilson.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent the very distinct and striking Brassocattleya Alexanderi,
Brassocatlelia Figaro (B.-l. Jessopii X B.-c. Leemanniz), a very distinct
yellow flower, with some rosy brown markings on the lip, and Odonto-
glossum Griselda, a large yellow hybrid, with some red-brown blotches
about the centre of the segments.

Walter Cobb, Esq., Normanhurst, Rusper (gr. Mr. Salter), sent
Odontioda Cooksoniz The Gem, a fine scarlet form.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier), sent
cut flowers of a beautiful series of hybrid Dendrobiums, among which the
fine D. Lady Colman was noteworthy, also the rare Queensland D. Smilliz
and D. Johannis.

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent a
small group, including the fine Odontioda harvengtense Crawshayanum, O.
Nerissa, O. Solon, two pretty forms of Odontioda Bradshawie, one having
orange-coloured sepals and petals and a more yellow lip, a good O. Charles-
worthii, and the pretty orange-coloured O. Carmen.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, showed Odontoglossum
James O’Brien (Duvivierianum Xx harvengtense), having light yellow sepals
and petals, with large claret-brown blotches, and a large blotch on the lip,
which is nearly white in front, Sophrocatlelia Hon. Barbara Wilson Orchid
Dene var., and Cattleya Suzanne Hye de Crom Orchid Dene var., having
the sepals tinted with rose, and the front of the lip rose-purple.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent Lzliocattleya
,Charmien (C. Triane alba X L.-c. bletchleyensis), a large white flower with
some lilac markings on the lip.

M. Jules Hye de Crom, Ghent, showed the fine Miltonia Hyeana Stella,
bearing four spikes.

F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford, showed Odontioda Red
Riding Hood (Odontoglossum Rossii X Odontioda Bradshawiz), most like
the former in general character but with red markings.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Cattleya
Trianz Empress of India, a large and we ll-coloured form.

130 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (APRIL, 19T3.

Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill),
showed Cattleya Schroedere Madame Dina Beaumer, a large white flower,
with faint lavender tinge on the lip.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a choice group,
containing many showy Dendrobiums, Lzeliocattleya Olivia, several yellow
hybrids with the front of the lip claret coloured, a pretty Leliocattleya from
C. Percivaliana x L. anceps Schroeder, having blush white flowers with
some brown markings on the yellow disc of the lip, Odontioda Cupid,
heatonensis, Charlesworthii and Bradshawiz, Miltonia Bleuana, and a few
good -Brassocattleyas, Cymbidiums and Odontoglossums (Silver Flora
Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including good examples of Phaius tuberculosus and P. simulans, the rare
Eulophiella Elisabethz, Odontioda Charlesworthii, a beautiful example of
Odontoglossum armainvillierense xanthotes, O. eximium, Cattleya Suzanne
Hye de Crom, the fine Leliocattleya Dominiana var. Prince of Wales, and
others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a fine group, includ-
ing Dendrobium Wardianum, D. Brymerianum, some good Cattleya Schree-
dere and C.S. alba, Leliocattleyas, Oncidium concolor, Sophrolelia Leda,
and other good things (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including good
forms of Cattleya Schreederz, Brassocattleya Leemanniz, three of the fine
purple B.-c. Siren, Ccelogyne flaccida, Trichopilia suavis, Masdevallia
elephanticeps, Vanda ccerulescens, Sarcochilus Fitzgeraldii, Renanthera
Imschootiana, Leliocattleya Electra (L. Latona x C. Trianz), Odonto-
glossum Landolphus, O. Niobe (elegans X armainvillierense), O. eminens
(spectabile x Arlequin), O. Groganii, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Mr. Sidney Flory, Tracy’s Nursery, Twickenham, staged a good group,
including examples of Oncidium concolor, O. Cavendishianum, the rare
Eulophia Saundersiana, Coelogyne sparsa, Pleurothallis Grobyi, Odonto-
glossum Pescatorei, Clytie and Phocis, Cattleya Triane alba, and others
(Silver Banksian Medal). |

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a good group, including
Cattleya Lueddemanniana Stanleyi, two good Angrecum sesquipedale,
Renanthera Imschootiana, Brassocattleya Menda, Odontoglossum Ossul-
stonii, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. J. Evans, Manor House, Key Green, Congleton, showed a rich red-
flowered form of Oncidioda Cooksoniz.

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, showed Lycaste
Skinneri alba, Cattleya Schroeder, and a pretty Leliocattleya (L.-c.
luminosa x C. Triane).

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 131

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

BRASSOCATTLEYA CLIFTONII MAGNIFICA (B.-c. Veitchii xX C. Trianz
Uplands var.).—A remarkably fine form, having rosy mauve sepals and
petals, and a deep rose-purple lip, with a paler fringed margin. Exhibited
by F. Menteith Ogilvie, Esq.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CaTTLEYA MaGNeEtT (Mossie X Whitei).—A very richly-coloured hybrid,
bearing four fine rose-purple flowers, and the lip entire, with some claret-
coloured veining. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O.

CATTLEYA TiTyus SHRUBBERY VAR. (Enid x Octave Doin).—A_ hand-
some variety, having broad blush white sepals and petals, and the lip
broad and crimson in front of the yellow disc. Exhibited by F. M.
Ogilvie, Esq.

CATTLEYA TRIANZ ALBA SOUVENIR DE. Louis VERDONCK.—A very fine
pure white form. Exhibited by M. Jules Hye de Crom.

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM CoBB’s VAR.—A very fine white form, bearing
a spike of fourteen flowers, with a large red-brown blotch on each segment.
Exhibited by Walter Cobb, Esq.

. CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

ODONTIODA BRADSHAWIL&.—To Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., for a
strong plant, bearing four panicles, and producing a very fine effect.

OponToGLossuM Rossii and O. PULCHELLUM.—To Mr. W. H. White,
Orchid grower to Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., for a very fine pan, containing
several varieties of O. Rossii, and two plants of O. pulchellum, the best
bearing eleven spikes.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

At the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on February
2oth the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in
the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, J. Cypher, J. Evans, A, Hanmer, D.
McLeod, W. J- Morgan, C. Parker, F. K. Sander, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward,
Wm. Thompson, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Large Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden
(gr. Mr. Weatherby), for a group of well-grown Odontoglossums. and
Cypripediums in variety, with Lycaste Skinneri alba.

Silver Medals were awarded to S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr.
Mr. Brown) ; A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish) ; Col.
Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton); and Messrs. Cypher
& Sons, Cheltenham, for good mixed groups. Col. Rutherford’s group
contained a promising Brassocatlelia (C. Octave Doin X B.-l. Gratrixiz).

A Bronze Medal was awarded to Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a group of well-grown Cypripediums.

134 THE ORCHID REVIEW. LArnesisatdl

Interesting exhibits were staged by O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr.
Rogers); Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge; Messrs. J. Charlesworth & Co.,
Haywards Heath; Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, and Mr. W.
Shackleton, Great Horton.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium West Point Monarch (Mrs. Cary Batten xX Alcibiades),
and C. Lady Dillon ‘‘ West Point” var. (nitens ‘ Ball’s” var. x Mrs.
Mostyn), both from S. Gratrix, Esq.

Cattleya Trianz Snowflake, from Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

AWARD OF APPRECIATION.

Odontioda Schreederi (Odontioda Bradshawie xX Odontoglossum
crispum), from Mr. W. Shackleton.

CULTURAL CERTIFICATE.

Odontoglossum crispum Leonard Perfect, a very finely-grown plant with
a spike of fourteen flowers, from S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr.
Brown).

At the meeting held on March 6th, the members of Committee present
were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs. J. Cypher, J. Evans,
Dr. Hartley, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, G. Morris, F. K. Sander, W. Thomp-
son, H. Thorp, A. Warburton, Z. A. Ward, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gt.
Mr. Gilden), for a beautiful miscellaneous group, including many well-
grown Odontoglossums, Cattleyas, Dendrobiums, Odontioda Charles-
worthii and keighleyensis, Miltonia Bleuana and Warscewiczii, with
Cymbidium insigne and eburneum.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden
(gr. Mr. Weatherby); S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr. Brown) ;
Col. Rutherford, Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton); and A. Warburton, Esq.,
Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), for choice miscellaneous groups.

A Silver Medal was awarded to Messrs. James Cypher & Sons,
Cheltenham, for a nice mixed group, in which was a plant of the rare
and pretty Sarcochilus Fitzgeraldii.

Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), was
awarded a Bronze Medal for a good group of Cypripediums in variety.

Interesting exhibits were staged by J. J. Holden, Esq., Southport
(gr. Mr. Johnson); W. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange (gr. Mr. Howes) ;
Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge; Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.,
Haywards Heath; Mr. D. McLeod, Chorlton-cum-Hardy; Mr. J-
Evans, Congleton, and Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, the latter staging
a fine group of Dendrobiums, Cypripediums, Odontiodas, Odontoglossums,
and others.

Be

APRIL, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 133

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

Odontioda St. Fuscien Ward’s var. (O. Adriane x C. Neetzliana), a

good flower, very dark in colour, from Z. A. Ward, Esq.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Richard Ashworth (Lathamianum giganteum xX Leeanum
Clinkaberryanum) ; Odontoglossum Cloth of Gold (Wilckeanum X amabile) ;
O. Leeanum majus (Black Prince x General Roberts), all from R. Ashworth,
Esq., Newchurch.

Odontioda Zephyr West Point var., and Cypripedium Duke of
Marlborough (Leeanum Lavertonianum x Adrastus Marie, from S.
Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range.

Odontoglossum A. E. Thompson, parentage unknown, and Cypripedium
Mrs. E. G. Guest (Thompsonianum xX Alcibiades), from Wm. Thompson,
Esq., Stone.

ORCHIDS FROM HESSLE.

WE have received a beautiful series of Cypripediums from the collection of
W. P. Burkinshaw, Esq., Hessle, E. Yorks (gr. Mr. J. T. Barker).
Specially noteworthy among them is a fine twin-flowered scape of C.
Euryades New Hall Hey var., having the dorsal sepal heavily blotched
with dark purple on a white ground, and richly-coloured petals and lip.
The shape is good, and as the green of the dorsal sepal is reduced to a small
area at the base, it should make an excellent parent for hybridising from.
C. Euryades King Edward VII. has a very dark, heavily-blotched dorsal
sepal, recalling C. Boxallii atratum. It was raised in the collection. C.
Chantecleer Hessle var. (insigne Harefield Hall var. x Thalia) is a very
fine form, also raised in the collection, and having the dorsal sepal nearly
three inches across, and very heavily blotched with purple on a white
ground, with a small green basal area, and the petals broadly dilated at the
apex, and suffused with purple. The clear white C. Boltonii is represented by
a two-flowered scape, other fine things being C. aureum Surprise, C. Minos
Youngii, C. Thompsonii magnificum, C. insigne Sanderianum, C. Leeanum
Lavertonianum, C. chrysotoxum Victor, and C. Euryades Hessle var. A
flower of C. insigne Harefield Hall var. is also enclosed, in which the lip
has failed to free itself from the column, and thus is curiously crumpled up
—probably an accidental occurrence. Other interesting things are the
pure white Leeliocattleya Boylei var. Kerchovee, a very charming thing,
Brassocattleya Edgar Wigan, and a white form of B.-c. Veitchii (C.
Mossiz bellissima x B. Digbyana), a fine form, but not quite so pure in
colour as var. Queen Alexandra. They form a very beautiful series,
and illustrate the decorative value of the plants during the dull winter
months. " :

134 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [APRIL, 1913.

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

A PRETTY seedling of very good shape is sent from the collection of O. O.
Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury, by Mr. Rogers. The colour is yellow
with a brown suffusion, and there is a marked resemblance to C. villosum
and C. Leeanum in shape. We should have considered it as a form of C.
aureum, but it is suggested that it may have come from C. Sallieri
Hyeanum X cenanthum, from which several somewhat similar forms are said
to have flowered. That would make it a form of C. triumphans, but there is
none of the rich colouring of C. cenanthum about the flower. It is a form
to be taken care of. A very beautiful form of Odontoglossum triumphans
is also sent, having clear golden yellow sepals and lip, and one large warm
brown blotch on the centre of each sepal. The absence of even a speck of
brown from the petals and lip give it a very striking appearance. It is
quite typical in shape, and keeps constant, for a notice appeared at page
126 of our nineteenth volume. It may be called O. triumphans var.
Wrigleyi.

A flower of the very handsome Leliocattleya Sunset Southfield var.
(L. Jongheana Cabralii x C. Percivaliana Westfield var.) is sent from the
collection of W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield, Edgbaston. The flower
is bright rosy mauve in colour, with the spreading shape of the former, and
measures six inches from tip to tip of the petals, which latter are two inches
broad. The lip is three-lobed, and much crisped, the front lobe being rosy
mauve with a rich dark brown veined blotch, while the disc and interior of
the side lobes are orange-coloured, with some brown down the centre and
five obtuse keels. The two parents have formed a particularly happy
combination, and the plant should develop into a very fine thing.

DENDROBIUM NOBILE COOKSONIANUM.—A fine plant of this handsome
variety is now flowering in the collection of T. Daws, Esq., Ewhurst,
producing an aggregate of thirty-seven blossoms, which are borne on
exceptionally long stems. The peculiar maroon blotches borne on the
petals of this Orchid render it very striking. The variety originally appeared
as a sport in the collection of Mr. Theodore Lange, Heathfield House,
Gateshead, whence it passed into that of Norman C. Cookson, Esq., but
now has become fairly plentiful, thanks to the ease with which Dendrobiums
can be propagated, and is one of the most delightful Orchids for an
Amateur’s mixed house. Several flowers of this plant have been cross-
fertilised with a view to ascertaining whether it can be raised true from
seed, as was the case with D. nobile virginale. In the same collection are
also flowering, amongst other things, a plant of Oncidium maculatum and
Odontoglossum Vuylstekez, which have been intercrossed. C, Ac Hy:

APRIL, 1913.] THE. ORCHID REVIEW. 135

THE HYBRIDIST.
L#LIOCATTLEYA SyYRINX.—Raised in the collection of H. T. Pitt, Esq.,
Rosslyn, Stamford Hill, it is said from L.-c. Phoebe x Ballii, though there
is no trace of the orange colour of Lelia cinnabarina, which should have
come through both parents. It is a seedling flowering for the first time,
and the flower is rather small at present, and the colour pink, with an
orange yellow throat to the lip.

L&LIOCATTLEYA PROMEN#&A.—Raised in the same collection as the
preceding, from a hybrid between L.-c. Gottoiana and Lelia Cowanii x
Cattleya Frederickia. The flower is light rose-purple, with a very un-
dulate lip. It is also a first flower from a small plant, and should improve
much when the plant becomes strong.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
THREE meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during April, on
the rst, 15th, and 2gth, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual
hour, 12 o’clock noon.

Meetings of the Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will
be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on April 3rd and 17th. The
Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection from
1to4p.m. The following meeting is fixed for May 1st, on which date the
Annual Meeting will also be held.

The 17th Quinquennial International Horticultural Exhibition will be
held at Ghent from April 26th to May 4th next. Judging will take place
on April 25th. We may add that the name of Mr. John S. Moss should
have been added to the list of jurors given at page 103.

The first part of a very interesting paper, entitled ‘‘ Orchids, their
popularity and culture,” by Mr. H. G. Alexander, Orchid grower to Sir
George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., appears at page 107. It was read at a
meeting of the Bath and District Gardeners’ Mutual Improvement
Association, held at the-Chandos Hall, Bath, on February 13th last. A
full report appeared in Keene’s Bath Journal for February 15th, for which we
are indebted to a Bath correspondent.

THE Kew Orcuip House OuTRAGE.—Since our note at page 106 went
to press the following has appeared :-—At the West London Police Court
On March 28th, Olive Hocken, 32, an artist, on whose premises the
Suffragette ‘“‘ arsenal” was found, was committed for trial on four charges

of conspiracy, one of which was in connection with the damage to the

136 THE ORCHID REVIEW. padi, dodee

Orchid houses at Kew. On the previous day Maria Elizabeth Hall, a
caretaker, said the accused was a tenant of the first floor of the premises at
Campden Hill Gardens for about two years. The afternoon before the
Orchid houses at Kew were damaged another lady was with Miss Hocken
in the studio, and the same evening a motor car, driven by a lady, came, and
some parcels and long wooden poles were taken from the studio and
strapped to it. The car left the studio about 10.30 with Miss Hocken
and another lady as passengers. About four o’clock next morning she
heard the door bang and the noise of some one moving about. There was
another lady with accused that morning. Witness had to clean two pairs
of ladies’ boots, and they were very muddy and had grass on them.

As to the Kew fire outrage reported at p. 74, we may add that one of
the women has been sentenced to eighteen months’ imprisonment, to find
sureties for good behaviour for a further period of two years, and to pay the
costs of the trial. The case of the cther woman is not concluded, she
having endangered her life through adopting the “‘ hunger strike.”

CyPRIPEDIUM BROADOAKSIENSIS (page 100).—Mr. F. Wrigley, Broadoaks,
Bury, writes that this isa seedling purchased (the source is not stated), not
raised in the collection.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.
ANGRZECUM:ANDERSONII, Rolfe.—Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 146, fig. 65.
BRASSOCATTLEYA MENDA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 158, with fig.
BRASSOCATTLEYA VEITCHII THE DELL VARIETY.—Gard. Mag., 1913, P-

183, with fig.
CATTLEYA TRIAN& AND VAR. ALBA.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 369, with figs.
MEGACLINIUM TRISTE.—Gard. Chron., 1g13, 1. p. 131, fig. 60.

—_s

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

[Orchids are named Gey ch pated cba py eae at a as possible. Currespondents are
requested to ‘sive the native or parentage of pla An ADDRESSED fostcard must be
nc ody a reply by post is dened pet at d, rly spasiceeds heaid be used). Subjects of special interest

é dealt with in the body of the work. |

.H.—A good dark form of Dendrobium nobile. There is no evidence of its bei ing

a hybrid, and we presume that it came om vo an importation. The term “ Florists’ flower”
can only be gee to inipraved garden

+ he ris irs sigaatea, ‘Lindl. It i me usual Lycaste treatment.
C.K. Dendsobiem undulat R. note is hel
R.C.K.—A good ake color form of Cattleya a Tri ase
}.5. Hi. yc ee a natural hybrid between L. Skinneri and L. lasioglossa.
Photographs 1 received with thanks.—J.S.M.; R.C.K.; C.K
Catalogues received.—Catalogue of the Monton Grange Collection of Orchids ; from
Messrs. A. a Kesting & Sons, Bradford. Catalogue of Orchids, Cacti, and other Mexican
plants ; from Juan Balme & Co., eo ae City. Catklorae Général ; from M. Jules de Cock,

i ids.

RECFIVED.— One and All Ga i denine, 1913. From the Agricultural and Horticultural
Association, Ltd., 92, Long Acre, London, W.C., a useful and well illustrated issue, but
do not find anything about Orchids.

THE ORGHID REVIEW.

VoL. XXI.} MAY, ty13. [No. 245.

ORCHIDS.AT HAYWARDS HEATH.

VisiTors to the Royal Horticultural Hall on April rst were greatly
interested in a plant of Cymbidium Humblotii bearing a magnificent
panicle of over 100 flowers, for which Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. received
both a Cultural Commendation and a First-class Certificate. A few days
later we had the pleasure of seeing half-a-dozen fine plants in bloom at
Haywards Heath, one of them bearing two spikes, and the sight will not
soon be forgotten. They came out of an importation of Madagascar
Orchids received about two years ago. The plants when imported were in
excellent condition, probably the finest consignment ever sent to Europe,
and no difficulty was, experienced in getting them to grow from the
commencement. They were fixed on upright rafts of teak-wood, and a
mixture of osmunda fibre and fibrous loam was worked along and under the
rhizome, which proved to be an ideal rooting medium for them. The
species should open up another field for the hybridist now that Cymbidium
hybrids have been taken so much in hand since the introduction of the
beautiful C. insigne. Of course it remains to be proved whether C.
Humblotii will unite freely with the Asiatic species.

The importation of Madagascar Orchids just mentioned was a
Particularly fine one, coming to hand in splendid condition. It included,
besides the Cymbidium, Eulophiella Peetersiana and E. Elisabethze, Phaius
tuberculosus (sent as a new species), and P. simulans, Grammangis Ellisii,
Angreecum articulatum, citratum, Germinyanum, recurvum, eburneum,
and sesquipedale. These all established themselves splendidly, with the
€xception of Eulophiella Peetersiana, of which only three were saved.
These particular plants were sent home as found growing on a species of
Pandanus, and the collector advised Messrs. Charlesworth not to disturb
them, as he felt sure that they would establish themselves very quickly if
Potted up at once and put into a warm humid house. The result was
anything but satisfactory, but of E. Elisabethe every plant has done well
and flowered this season. At the present time there are two magnificent
Specimens in flower, one with:six spikes and the other with five (this having

Toad leaves and particularly fine flowers), besides smaller plants with one,
137

138 THE ORCHID “REVIEW. [May, 1913.

two, and three spikes each. It has seldom been seen in such fine condition.

Phaius simulans (so long called P. tuberculosus in gardens) was treated
in the same way, and placed directly under the shade and protection of the
Cymbidium, the spreading foliage cf which, with its thick texture, gave to
the more delicate and shade-loving Phaius the nearest approach to its
natural conditions of growing that could be thought of, and the results
have more than justified the most sanguine expectation. Over a dozen
plants were in bloom, one bearing a spike of twelve flowers, and another
had particularly dark markings on the lip. We have never before seen it
in such fine condition and flowering in such profusion. On looking at these
‘plants’ one could hardly realise that the species has proved difficult to grow.
The position chosen is the south end of the Phalznopsis house, with
-adequate shading and special provision for aconstantly moist atmosphere.
A warm, moist, well-shaded corner is evidently what this species requires.
We need hardly say that the opportunity of using this beautiful Orchid
-again for hybridising is not being lost, and several of the Indian species
have recently been in flower, as well as the hybrid P. Norman. Of course
‘much of the ground has been covered before by the late Mr. Norman
Cookson, but some of the hybrids are rare, and there is plenty of scope
for further experiments. The single plant of P. tuberculosus was just
passing out of bloom (see p. 144, fig. 29).

Other Madagascar Orchids in flower were Eulophiella Peetersiana with
two very fine spikes, Angraecum sesquipedale and Germinyanum, nice
batches of A. citratum and Sanderianum, several AZonia polystachya, one
of them with over 20 spikes, giving a very graceful appearance, and the
very distinct Aéranthes grandiflorus throwing up several spikes. In the
same house we noted the rare Arachnanthe Cathcartii in bloom, with
Bulbophyllum barbigerum, Listrostachys Chailluana, Phaleenopsis Aphro-
dite and P. Stuartiana. A batch of strong plants of Grammangis Ellisil
was interesting, also Eulophia paniculata with fleshy variegated leaves.

Passing to the fine range of seedling houses, it was interesting to begin
where the seeds were germinating and the young seedlings pricked off,
and thence to pass successively through the different houses where the
plants are grown on until they reach the flowering stage. The process was
repeated in both the warmer and cooler divisions, the latter being specially
interesting because of the great progress being made in raising Odonto-
glossums and Odontiodas.

A house is devoted to Odonticdas of flowering size, and we noted in
bloom forms of O. Bradshawie, Cassiope, keighleyensis, Hippolyta,
Charlesworthii, Diana, Cooksoniz, heatonensis, Craveniana, and others.
We counted an aggregate of 141 spikes, including many of great beauty and
very rich colouring. One form of O. Bradshawie bore a panicle with nine

May, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 139

side branches and seventy flowers, forming a picture. Many others were
noticed elsewhere, and various secondary hybrids were beginning to flower,
and showed great diversity in coloration. Three of these were specially
striking, and as Messrs. Charlesworth kindly gave us a series of flowers it
was possible to study them in some detail. Two forms of O. Royal Gem
(Vuylstekeze x Odontoglossum armainvillierense) were very diverse, one
having a white ground with a large rosy blotch above the base of the
segments and some small spots towards the apex, while the other had a rosy
ground with numerous darker spots. Four seedlings of O. Joan (Charles-
worthii X Odontoglossum armainvillierense) were producing their first
flowers, and showed a wide range of variation. One had light yellow ground
colour, and the sepals and petals barred with rich red brown, the ‘ip being
pandurate, with a large red-brown blotch in front of the crest, and numerous
smaller spots at the base. A second was larger, and so much more blotched
as to have only yellow lines all over the segments, while the similarly-
coloured lip was deltoid in shape. A third was again larger, with a deltoid
lip, and many basal spots, while the other segments were heavily blotched
with red on a yellow ground. The fourth had almost brick-red flowers,
with traces of yellow lines, and a deltoid lip with a very broad base.
Lastly may be mentioned five seedlings of O. Patricia (Charlesworthii X
‘Odontoglossum Phoebe), showing a remarkable range of variation. As they
are described in the Scientific Committee’s Report at page 167 their
characters need not be repeated.

Passing along to Odontoglossums, another remarkable case of variation
Was pointed out. Odontoglossum Scottianum, named in compliment to
Sir Benjamin Scott, of Carlisle, showed several distinct forms out of the
Same batch. The parentage is rather interesting, viz., O. oakwoodiense X
armainvillierense. O. oakwoodiense is a plant of Mr. Cookson’s, which we do
not distinctly remember, but it is said to be either a form of O. Wileckeanum
or a natural hybrid between O. luteopurpureum and some other species.
The results obtained from crossing this with a finely spotted O. armain-
villierense were very extraordinary. There were in flower plants which to
the casual observer looked like pure spotted armainvillierense, others more
like large plain Pescatorei, and some looking fairly intermediate but with
the blotching more inclined towards the brown of the luteopurpureum.
There is also a plain white form resembling a particularly good O. crispum,
the flower being almost round, and of splendid substance. Upon looking
at it carefully one can see a slight influence of O. luteopurpureum in the
lip, but to all intents and purposes it looks like a pure crispum. One very
Pretty form had'the ground colour of the lip clear yellow, and a tinge of the
Same colour in the sepals and petals, showing clearly a-reversion to the
8tound colour of O. luteopurpureum.

140 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (May, 1913

A large number of other hybrid Odontoglossums were seen in bloom, and
we were particularly struck with their sturdy growth, large firm bulbs, and
the quality of the spikes and flowers, features that indicate the excellence
of culture carried on here. Odontoglossums are not always seen in this.
condition, and we asked Mr. Charlesworth for the minimum winter
temperature of the houses. His reply was 52° F. for the established plants
and 56° for the seedlings. We have seen lower figures advocated, and we
are firmly convinced that a low winter temperature is one of the causes of
failure in Odontoglossum culture. We took notes of many interesting
things, but have not space to enumerate those seen in bloom. A number
of capsules told of further progress in hybridising, and many interesting
experiments are in progress.

There are houses of seedling Cattleyas and Lzliocattleyas, in all stages,
and we were much interested in some of the crosses, and particularly with
the experiments being made to increase the number of yellow-flowered
hybrids, which, however, proves to be a very difficult business owing to the
amount of reversion to purple that takes place. A batch of seedling
Cattleya Dowiana aurea was pointed out, obtained from the best forms of
this Cattleya without hybridisation, and this should give some excellent
yellow forms when the seedlings flower. Several fine Cattleyas and Lzelio-
cattleyas were in bloom, and here, too, we noted some surprising examples
of variation, particularly Brassolelia Gratrixie x Cattleya Octave Doin
with both salmon-coloured and mauve varieties from the same capsule.

Among the species many fine things were in bloom, and we can only
enumerate a few of them. A plant of the handsome Oncidium Claesii was
bearing a long trailing spike with ten side branches, and a large number of
its handsome purple flowers. A lot of Trichopilia Backhouseana were
coming into bloom and promise a very fine display. A batch of Oncidium
concolor showed the effect of massing, and the result was brilliant. Some
Cattleya citrina were in bloom, one of them having a twin-flowered scape.
There were two plants of the distinct reddish Polystachya paniculata
blooming well. Several plants of the charming little Miltonia Phalaenopsis
were blooming freely, also a batch of M. Roezlii, while a house of M-
vexillaria was a forest of spikes, and the plants in the most robust health.
A promising seedling from M. vexillaria chelseiensis fertilised with M. v-
memoria G. D. Owen was beginning to expand, and one could just see a
large dark blotch on the lip. A fine lot of the handsome Phaius Norman,
and a batch of Zygocolax Charlesworthii were also in bloom.

But we must close our note book, for it is impossible to enumerateza
tithe of the interesting features of this model establishment, and we must
congratulate Mr. Charlesworth and his manager, Mr. Smith, on the
progress and excellent culture that are everywhere apparent.

May, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 14

ORCHID-CULTURE IN ENGLAND AND AUSTRALIA.
I sPENT six months of last year in England, during avhich time I
attended the International as well as other Flower Shows, and perhaps a
few observations from one who is trying with more or less success’ to grow
Orchids in Australia may be interesting to your readers.

Iam quite sure from what I have seen that England, nobuirhesadtne
its want of sunlight, is an ideal country for growing Orchids under artificial
‘conditions ; the soft moist air, mild temperatures, and absence of scorching
sun, such as we have here, give English growers advantages which few
others possess. No doubt English gardeners. in all departments of
horticulture are extremely skilful, but I think the much maligned English
climate has a great deal to do with the magnificent results attained. I can
only say that the high cultivation andthe splendid quality of the Orchids
shown at the International has exceeded anything we could ever hope to
attain to in this part of Australia. I have never seen Cattleyas shown here
that would compare with them, and the same remark applies to most other
varieties.

Here in Sydney our shirts is too cold and eee to. grow the
majority of the more hardy Orchids in the shade- or bush-house as they do
in Queensland, and yet it is hot enough to make their cultivation under
glass somewhat difficult. Glass. houses here in the summer are apt to
become too hot altogether unless heavily shaded, and we have considerable
difficulty on account of the dryness of our atmosphere in keeping the
humidity necessary in the houses with a sufficiency of ventilation. We are
largely dependent on English gardening publications, including the
valuable Orchid Review, for hints as to how the various kinds shall be grown,
‘but such information in our climate is often most misleading, and finally we
have to gain our local experience.

Cattleyas and Leliocattleyas I am growing under much more shade
than is recommended in England. The glass has a good coat, of paint and
the lath blinds are let down during the hottest part of the day, but in the
‘Winter season we give them more light. The plants are sprayed over once
or twice a day during the growing season, according to the weather and
atmospheric conditions. Owing to the scarcity of labour in this country all
the watering has to be done in this way. Under these conditions I am
getting fair results, but nothing approaching the English standard of
Culture. .

Dendrobium nobile and its hybrids we keep in a well-veritilated but
lightly-shaded house during the growing season, but as soon as the plants
have made their growth in the autumn we put them in a shade- or bush-
house with a few sheets of glass over them to keep off excessive rain. They

‘142 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (May, 1913.

are practically in the open air till they show their flower buds. Plants thus.
ripened off flower and grow well with me.

The hardier Cypripediums grow and flower well in a cool, shaded glass-
house with no artificial heat, and with the ventilators and usually the door
open all:the year: round night and day. The plants do not grow so:
vigorously or propagate so quickly as they do in England, but such difficult
varieties as C. Fairrieanum and C. Charlesworthii do fairly well under this
treatment. I have plants of C. insigne and C. villosum thriving in the
open bush-house. Lelia anceps I could never get to flower when grown
under glass. I am now growing them successfully hanging from the roof
of the bush-house ; they do not, however, show the vigour of the plants-
grown in England. Dendrobium nobile tried under similar conditions.
absolutely failed.

Cymbidium Lowianum, also the hybrid C. Lowiano-eburneum, grows.
most vigorously and flowers well in the open air in any partially-shaded
position, and I have several specimen plants in tubs which measure four
feet across.

It is quite impossible to grow Odontoglossums or the cooler Orchids im
this warm climate. Our main difficulties in Orchid culture are the sudden
changes of temperature and humidity, and the excessive heat and dryness-
of the atmosphere.

In conclusion, allow me to bear testimony to the wonderful hospitality
accorded to myself and other visitors from Australia by the Committee
of the Royal International Horticultural Exhibition. We were most
generously entertained, and we took it as a great compliment to our
adopted country. ARTHUR YATES.

Sydney, N.S. W.

CCELOGYNE PANDURATA.

A RECENT issue of Horticulture gives a figure of Coelogyne pandurata, which
is described as an ideal flower for St. Patrick’s Day. ‘“ How ridiculous it
seems to dye white carnations green for St. Patrick’s Day!” remarks Mr.
M. J. Pope, who has on numerous occasions been asked what is the name
of these green pinks which people see in the florist’s store prior to and on
St. Patrick’s Day, but at no other time of the year. Now, if florists are
anxious to serve the dear people from the Emerald Isle with green flowers
on St. Patrick’s Day, why don’t they look around Nature’s storehouse first
and see what they can find in that line before degrading our honourable
profession by putting a faked article on the market. Ccelogyne pandurata

has the most lovely shade of green anybody could possibly ask for, and it —
usually blooms about this time. The only part of the flower that is not
green is the pandurate lip, which has some jet black blotches bordered in

May, 1913] THE ORCHID. REVIEW. 143-

part with white. Too bad that the lip isn’t harp-shaped instead of fiddle-
shaped! How appropriate it would be! Like all Ccelogynes, it is of the
easiest possible culture; a shady place in a warm greenhouse or stove will
suit it. During the growing season it must have a liberal supply of water,.
and it must not be kept dry for any length of time, even during the resting
periods.
ORCHIDS OF THE FLORA CAPENSIS,

THE appearance ofa first part of the Orchids of the Flora Capensis, by Mr..
R. A. Rolfe, A.L.S., was mentioned at page 376 of our last volume, and
the concluding part having now appeared a short summary may be
attempted. Orchids occupy a prominent place in the Cape Flora, though
the majority are terrestrial, and very few of them are generally cultivated.
The present enumeration deals with 496 species, belonging to forty-seven
genera. The tribes are very unequally distributed, Ophrydez coming first
with thirty-two genera and 358 species, Vande second with eight genera
and 128 species, Epidendrez third with three genera and six species, and
Neottiez last with four genera and four species. Eulophia is the largest
genus, having seventy-two South African species, Disa following closely
with sixty-nine, after excluding Lindley’s genera Monadenia, Herschelia,
Forficaria and Schizodium, which were included in Disa by Bolus, though
here they are recognised as distinct. Satyrium has fifty-two species,
Habenaria thirty-seven, Disperis thirty-six, and Holothrix twenty-four,.
while no fewer than fourteen genera are represented by a single speeies.
Seventy new species are described and five genera, the latter being
sections of large genera now considered distinct. As already remarked, most.
of the species are terrestrial, the exceptions being Angraecum, Listrostachys,
Mystacidium, Polystachya, Ansellia, and Megaclinium, which together
ageregate thirty-six species. Among the few species familiar in gardens.
may be mentioned the Peerless Disa grandiflora, the ‘‘ Pride of Table:
Mountain,” D. rosea, D. tripetaloides, Polystachya pubescens, Ansellia.
gigantea, Listrostachys arcuata, Mystacidium filicorne, Satyrium coriifolium.
and princeps, Stenoglottis longifolia and fimbriata, Cynorchis compacta,
and Bartholina pectinata. A few others are occasionally met with in
botanical collections, where they have a rather precarious existence owing
to difficulties in their culture. Very few of the species extend into Tropical
Africa, and a feature of their distribution is that a large number, including
a few of the smaller genera, are limited to the south-western region. The
work contains keys to the genera and species, full descriptions, references,
and synonymy, witha detailed account-of their geographteal. distribution.
The arrangement adopted is that of Bentham and Hooker’s Genera.
Plantarum.

THE ORGHID- REVIEW. [May, 1913.
PHAIUS TUBERCULOSUS.

THE annexed figure represents-the terrestrial Phaius tuberculosus, Blume,
which was originally described and figured by Thouars. under. the name. of
Limodorum tuberculosum (Orch. Iles Afr., t. 31), and for which an epiphytic
species, now known as P. simulans, Rolfe, did duty in gardens for so long.

The mistake was detected when plants of both were introduced by M.

Fig. 29. PHAIUS TUBEKCULOSUS.

Warpur about twelve years ago (O.R., ix. pp. 41-44

1

Messrs. Charlesworth

ot both species (see pp. 130, 137)-

& Co. have agatn introduced plants [
According to M. Warpur, P. tuberculosus grows on’slopes in the hig
in half-dry humus, at an altitude of 1, t
an intermediate temperature for it. P. simul

lower elevation, and requires more heat and moisture.

ans climbs on tree trunks at

rh forest,
200 to 1,500 feet, He recommends

A |
a

May, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 145

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
‘WirTH the advent of May the weather begins to get warmer, and as the sun
gains in power somewhat different cultural requirements are needed. Fire
heat is usually not necessary, yet should exceptionally cold and damp weather
prevail, it would be of advantage to have a little warmth in the pipes,
otherwise it might be impossible to give any ventilation. One should
endeavour to maintain the following average temperatures :—

Day, 58° to 65° Fahr.

Night, 55° to 60° Fahr.

Watering should be done with care, every plant being examined with a
view to ascertaining whether it is in need of water. A great point to be
remembered in regard to successful Orchid culture is to try and keep the
plants always in an even state of moisture, not too damp nor too dry, but,
as I remarked last month, the grower can alone determine how often this is
necessary.

Damping down should be done liberally, a moisture-laden atmosphere
being of absolute necessity. I find that on bright days it is usually needed
at 9.30, midday, and about three p.m., but when the weather is dull and
cloudy once at Ir a.m. is often sufficient.

Shading will now be needed as soon as the sun begins to shine directly
upon the roof glass. Towards the middle of this month the roof glass
should be painted with a weak solution of flour, lime, and water. Only
apply a thin coating, and this will be found to break the force of the sun’s
Tays without excluding at the same time any necessary light. Where,
moreover, this shading is employed, the blind can be lowered later and
raised earlier than would otherwise be the case.

Any imported Orchids which were purchased last month will now
probably be emitting some roots, and, if this is the case, they may be
potted up, as advised in my last month’s article. For the first week after
potting give only enough water to prevent shrivelling, but keep the
Surroundings very moist.

Lycaste Skinneri will now probably be over, and should repotting become
a matter of necessity it should be done at the present time. Leave only
' three back bulbs to support the new lead and cut off all dead roots. Place
to one side of the new pot so as to allow for future growth. For compost,
use a mixture of loam, osmunda fibre, and moss. Be very careful not to
have the base of the bulbs below the rim of the pot, otherwise decay will
probably set in.

Cymbidiums, if requiring attention, should be taken in hand this month
and treat as advised for Lycaste. Iam strongly in favour of the under-

146 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913-

mentioned soil; good yellow fibrous loam, a little cow dung, osmunda
fibre, and sphagnum moss. Use pots two sizes larger than the ones
previously occupied by the plants, for Cymbidiums are strong growers, and
do not like frequent root disturbance.

Any Orchids which are in need of fresh surface soil, without removing
enough to disturb the roots below, may be top-dressed, using a large
proportion of sphagnum moss.

SUGGESTED ADDITION.

ODONTOGLOSSUM PESCATOREI.—A very suitable species for an amateur’s:
collection. It bears some likeness to the universally popular O. crispum,
but the flowers are smaller, and are borne in great quantity on long
branching spikes, frequently sixty or more blossoms being produced. The
sepals and petals are white, and the disc of the lip yellow crested with a
few purple spots. It continues long in perfection, and may be procured at
a very reasonable figure. It was originally known as O. nobile. The
variety Sandere is unique and beautiful.

ORCHIDS IN ANT’S NESTS.

A very interesting note on some Tobago Orchids which grow in ant’s
nests has been sent by Mr. W. E. Broadway, of the Botanic Station,
Tobago. It is an extract from a letter by Mr. G. H. Sander, who is
stationed at Trafalgar, in the central and cool part of the island. In
sending a couple of plants of Epidendrum fulgens Mr. Sander remarks:
“The species is getting scarce round here. It is usually found on the tops
of very big trees growing in the bottoms of wet valleys, so that without
clearings they are not easy to obtain. Also they are always on an ant’s
nest in the same manner as Coryanthes speciosa and Epidendrum
xanthinum. I wonder why these three are almost invariably on ant’s
nests and the majority of the rest of Tobago Orchids usually free? On the
tree where I obtained this E. fulgens there was a mass of Ornithidium
confertum quite free from ants, also a big clump of Catasetum tridentatum,
and yet E. fulgens was alive with them.”

A similar fact was recorded by Im Thurn with respect to two
Epidendrums which grow in the Eldorado Swamp, Mount Roraima.
He remarks that they, ‘‘ unlike any of the others, are invariably associated
with ants, either because these creatures prefer to make their nests in the
roots of the plants, or because the seeds of the plants find their most
suitable nidus and germinate in the ant’s nests.” One of these species is
called E. Schomburgkii, Lindl., but a comparison of the dried specimen
shows it to belong to what Lindley called E. Schomburgkii var. confluens,
which is identical with E. fulgens, Brongn. The other is called E-
elongatum, Jacq., though a note explains that it is a species having the

May, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 147

facies of E. elongatum, but flowers of a peculiar shade of scarlet. A second:
note speaks of E. elongatum, ‘its stems varying in height from one to:
eight feet, its verbena-like clusters of flowers varying in colour of different
plants, some pale yellow, some fawn colour, many pure rich pink, dark.
purple, and even mauve.” ,This extreme variability is curious, and suggests
that more than one species may have been confused together.

As to the reason why these plants find a congenial home in ant’s nests-
a note by Rodway in the case of Oncidium altissimum is suggestive.
After giving a graphic account of an experience in obtaining this plant (see
O.R., iii. p. 40), he remarks: “ On the fork of a tree the Orchid had found
a congenial habitat, where it grew and flourished for years, developing a
great mass of roots to be occupied by the immense horde of ants, who, in
return for house accommodation, undertook to keep off the enemies of the:
Orchid, of which the cockroach was one of the most inveterate. . . + +
Is not this one of the reasons why the ants are so ready to take up their
abode among the Orchid roots? Where its food was to be found the
cockroach would certainly come, and the ant as certainly find its prey.”
The benefit may be mutual, and-we would suggest that the roots of the
Orchid may provide a suitable nesting place for the ants, as is certainly the
case with Schomburgkia and Diacrium.

The history of Epidendrum fulgens has already been given (O.R., v. p-
264), and it may be added that Mr. Sander’s note supplies a new locality
for the species, which was already known from the adjacent island of
Trinidad, as well as from Guiana and Brazil. E. xanthinum was originally
described from Brazil, and so far as I can find has not previously been.
recorded from the West Indies. R. A. R

THE BASIS OF MENDELISM.—Unit-characters are not things in them-
selves distinct and separate from the organ concerned ; each is a quantitative:
variation plus or minus in some one character possessed by the organism.
Each- quantitative condition of a character tends to persist from cell-
generation to cell-generation. When two quantitatively unlike conditions
of a character are brought together in a fertilised egg, they tend to keep
their distinctness in subsequent cell-generations and to segregate into
different gametes at reproduction, .e., they Mendelize. Only by figure of
speech are we justified in recognising a unit difference between them. That
difference might equally well be half as great as it is, or a quarter as great,
or a thousandth part as great. A mono-hybrid ratio would result equally in
each case upon crossing the two quantitatively different stages. It is the
Substantial integrity of a quantitative variation from cell-generation to
cell-generation that constitutes the basis of Mendelism. All else is
imaginary.—Pror. W. E. CASTLE.

248 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR MAY.

By J. T. Barker, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks. *
DurinG the present month Orchids generally will be in growth, and every
encouragement should be given them to build up and mature themselves as
quickly as possible. The summer temperatures must now be maintained in
all departments. When the outside conditions are mild and genial, the
heat and light from the sun must be husbanded in every possible way that
is conducive to the welfare of the plants, but during a cold spell allow a
slight fall in temperature. The following figures are safe and reliable for
the different departments during the next three months :—

Cool house: Night, 55° to 60°; day, 60° or as cool as possible.

Intermediate house: Night, 65° to 70°; day, 70° to 80°.

Warm houses; Night, 75°; day, 75° to 85°.

These figures are given as a guide, but local conditions vary, and every
cultivator must use his own discretion according to circumstances. Undue
fluctuations of temperature should be avoided. During extremely hot
weather the thin-leaved Cool-house Orchids are easily injured by excessive
heat or a dry, parched atmosphere.

ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE may now be used most liberally, and with the
increased amount of ventilation that will be necessary no harm is likely to
accrue from this source, provided the temperatures are maintained. Avoid
a hot and dry atmosphere, also a wet and cold one, as both are harmful for
any length of time.

VENTILATION.—The ventilation of the houses must have every attention,
especially in the southern districts where the sun has much power. Air
should be admitted in every department on all favourable occasions.
Ventilation during hot and dry weather needs some forethought, as if used
in excess the humidity of the atmosphere is soon lost, and draughts may be
easily caused which may do irreparable harm.

WATERING may be carried on as advised last month right through the
growing season, but in no case should plants be kept in a saturated
condition indefinitely, but the compost should be allowed to become dry
between each application of water to the roots.

SHADING also must have attention, as the blinds should not be down
when not required. On the other hand the sun must not be allowed to
shine on the plants when there is a danger of the foliage suffering. These
small.matters.are essential’if.the best results are to be attained.

CATTLEYAS, La#Lias, L&LIOCATTLEYAS, and others of the summet-
flowering section, which comprise many plants of complex parentage and
great beauty, are now pushing up their flowers within the sheaths, and it is
advisable that the plants should be thoroughly cleaned before the flowers

May, 1913 | THE ORCHID REVIEW. 149

push out, as there is a danger of them getting damaged if left to a later
period. When in bloom the plants may be moved to drier and slightly
cooler quarters, which will be the means of the flowers lasting longer in
perfection and be more accessible to those who object to the humidity and
heat of the growing houses. The potting of the plants, as they go out of
flower and begin to push roots at the base of the pseudobulbs, should have
attention whenever it becomes necessary.

CyYPRIPEDIUMS of the winter-flowering section which have not been
repotted should be done at once if they require it, as, if left too late, they
fail to produce flowers satisfactorily the following season. The plants this
season appear to me to carry their flowers much later than usual, as at the
time of writing many are even in full bloom. The summer-flowering
section, such as C. Lawrenceanum, niveum, Godefroye, bellatulum,.
Curtisii, and their numerous hybrids will be better cleaned and placed in
their flowering quarters, where no water from the syringe may reach them.

CYMBIDIUMS include some of the most easily-cultivated and stately
Orchids. Amongst the best known and most useful are C. Lowianum and its
variety concolor, C.eburneum, erythrostylum, giganteum, insigne, grandi-
florum, Tracyanum, and numerous hybrids. They should not be disturbed at
the roots, until really necessary, as the plants bloom more freely and produce:
finer flowers when the pots are well filled with: roots. Those plants that
have not sufficient room to develop the present season’s growth should be
Tepotted, also any in which the compost has become decomposed. In potting
plants of this character it is often a difficult matter to know what to do.
with the roots, as with healthy specimens they are often one solid mass.
Whenever possible it is best to disentangle them without breaking them,
picking out as much as possible of the old decayed compost with a pointed
Stick. The pots should be well drained, and of a larger size than is general,
and what would be considered a large shift in most cases is in this one not
unusual. A similar compost to that used for the green-leaved Cypripediuu:s,.
with slightly more loam fibre, will answer their requirement, and the plants
may be potted moderately firmly. Extreme caution is necessary in the
application of water to the newly-potted plants until the roots get fairly
hold of the compost. The best time to repot is whenever the half-made
Pseudobulbs are about to produce new roots. These Cymbidiums grow best
in a shady position in a cool Intermediate house, with plenty of fresh air.

ZYGOPETALUM with its allies, comprising Bollea, Pescatorea,
Warscewiczella, Huntleya, Promeneza, Batemannia, and Kefersteinia, form
fee interesting little group. The majority do not resemble Zygopetalum
in habit of growth, and, with the exception of Promenza, possess no
Pseudobulbs. Z. Mackayi, the best known and the most generally grown,
May be regarded as a typical example. These plants delight in a shady

450 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (May, 1913.

position, with an abundance of moisture around them, and an average
temperature of about 60°. These plants at the present time will be growing
fast, and should any be in need of new rooting material they may have
attention. Their surroundings should be kept moist, and the plants may be
-sprayed overhead two or three times a day on favourable occasions. Even
weak sunshine must not be allowed to reach them. They will succeed ina
mixture of fibre and moss, in equal portions, but the stronger growers may
have a small portion of loam fibre added. The dwarf-growing Promenzas
are best grown in small well-drained shallow pans, which may be suspended
over a tank or in a shady cool part of the Odontoglossum house. The
-quaint-flowered Chondrorhyncha Chestertonii requires the same treatment
as Zygopetalums, with which it is closely allied.

DENDROBIUMS.—Plants of D. thyrsiflorum, densiflorum, Farmeri,
chrysotoxum, fimbriatum, and others of the racemose section will now be
showing their flower buds, and should be afforded slightly more water at
the roots and a slightly warmer temperature, which will assist the expansion
and development of their flowers. Plants of D. formosum that are pushing
forth new roots, and are in need of new rooting material, may also have —
attention. This plant revels in plenty of heat and light whilst in growth,
with a long rest after flowering. D. infundibulum, Jamesianum, and other
members of the Nigro-hirsute section succeed best grown in a cool inter-
mediate temperature instead of a warm one. The compost advised last
month for Dendrobiums will also answer the requirements of this section.

SoBRALIAs and other terrestrial Orchids that are showing their flower
spikes will benefit by an occasional watering with weak liquid manure
water, especially if at all pot-bound. When in this state weak manure
water is beneficial to terrestial Orchids, but to epiphytic ones, in my opinion,
it is most harmful.

ODONTOGLOssuMs.—Such plants as O. grande, Insleayi, Williamsianum,
and others of this section, when their growths are fairly started and before
they push roots, should, if necessary, be repotted. I do not recommend the
system of top-dressing as often recommended, for if the compost 1s
decomposed on the top that at the bottom of the receptacle is in a worse
condition. They require a slightly higher temperature than the Cool
house. Plants of O. Rossii and its hybrids will also require attention as
regards repotting as they pass out of flower and their young growths get
nicely away. They thrive grown in shallow pans suspended in a cool
Intermediate house, in a position where they do not receive a super-
abundance of light. O. triumphans and its numerous hybrids may also be
repotted at this season if their growths are in the desired condition.

Vanbas.— The present is a good time to renew the rooting material of
any of the autumn-flowering Vandas, such as_V. ccerulea, Amesiana,

May, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 154

Kimballiana, and the natural hybrids from them. The whole of these
plants will grow satisfactorily in clean picked sphagnum moss. Plants
after being disturbed should be shaded until they get re-established, as if
subjected to too much light they may lose their leaves.

Cuysis.—Plants of C. bractescens, C. Limminghei, and others that have
finished flowering and are in need of new material may be repotted. Those
that were repotted last year, and need no disturbance now will require
abundance of water at the root, being in full growth. The plants grow
well in a similar compost to Cattleyas, in half pots, suspended in the
lightest position in the Cattleya house. Small yellow thrip attack these
plants persistently, and they should be frequently fumigated to destroy
these pests. When established and in full growth the plants should receive
copious supplies of water at the roots.

Oncipiums of the Cyrtochilum section, include O. macranthum,
serratum, lamelligerum, corynephorum and several others. These plants
are of comparatively easy culture if afforded a cool intermediate temperature.
They should receive all the light possible during the winter months, and be
protected from strong sunshine during the sunny ones. The plants should
not be allowed to produce flower spikes until they have become fairly strong
specimens. Repotting may be carried out at any time when the young
growths are producing new roots. A compost as advised for similar plants
will answer their requirements.

GENERAL REMARKS.—The present month is perhaps looked forward to
more than any other in the year, owing to the R.H.S. Show, when the
Orchid grower sallies forth from the different parts of this and other
countries to note the continual progress which is going on in our
profession. Many are the re-unions made year by year at this Mecca of all
Orchid lovers, and it is chiefly at these times that we miss those that have
dropped out by the way. How short is the life of even the longest, and how
little he can accomplish in the space of time given him, therefore whatever
is attempted should be thorough, as only by this means can we hope to
leave anything to posterity.

——_0<——- —
AUSTRALIAN ORCHIDS.
‘‘A FEW notes on Australian Orchids would be acceptable to us at the
Antipodes.” Thus writes an Australian correspondent, and he will be glad
to see a note from a compatriot at page 141.

Australian Orchids are not common in cultivation, with the single
exception of the genus Dendrobium, which contributes several interesting
Species to our collections, and among them the beautiful D. Phalznopsis,
which was originally described from Queensland specimens, though most of
the plants now in cultivation are believed to have come from New Guinea

152 THE. ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913-

or the adjacent islands. ‘Then we have D. bigibbum, D. superbiens, and
D. Goldei, all having very attractive purple flowers... D. speciosum is a well-
known white flowered species which makes an imposing display when well
grown, and between this and the pretty little rose-coloured D. Kingianum
there seems to be a curious set of natural hybrids whose history has already
been given (O.R., xvi. p. 88). D.undulatum is a very robust species bearing
long pendulous racemes of bronzy flowers, while in D. Johannis the spikes
are erect, and the flowers of a dusky blackish brown. Somewhat
approaching the latter in habit but differing in colour, we have D.
canaliculatum, which is sometimes met with, also the dwarfer D.
gracilicaule. D. emulum has short racemes of white flowers. D.
tetragonum is a remarkable species, and rather rare in gardens, while

Fig. 30. DENDROBIUM LINGUIFORME,

D. Smilliz is the single representative of the Pedilonum section, and has
dense spikes of white flowers, tinged with rose, and the lip green. D-
teretifolium is a very graceful plant, bearing long whip-like leaves and
pendulous spikes of white flowers with very narrow segments, and when
well grown is very effective. Lastly we may mention the remarkable little
D. linguiforme (fig. 30), and D. cucumerinum (Bot. Mag., t. 4019), i0
which the leaves have been well compared to little gherkins. Plants of
this remarkable species are in the collection of Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.,
at Gatton Park.

Sarcochilus Fitzgeraldii and S. Hartmannii are both pretty little
representatives of a rather large genus, whose members are not often met
with in cultivation. Phaius grandifolius and Calanthe veratrifolia are tw0

May, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 153

well-known Orchids which extend their area to Australia. A few others
are occasionally met with in botanical collections, including representatives
of the remarkable Australasian group Diuridez, which form such a large
element of the Australian flora, and which are beautifully illustrated in
Fitzgerald’s work on Australian Orchids.

It may be added that Bentham enumerated about 228 species of
Australian Orchids in the Flora Australiensis, belonging to forty-eight
genera, the largest genus being Caladenia, the Spider Orchids, with twenty-
seven species, Pterostylis and Dendrobium, twenty-four each, Prasophyllum,
twenty-three, Thelymitra, sixteen, and Diuris, thirteen, but a number of
others have since been described. About two-thirds of the species belong
to Diuridz, only a few of the twenty genera having outlying representatives
in New Zealand, and the Malayan Archipelago. The other third of the
species belong to twenty-eight genera which extend from Asia, but a good
many of the species are only Australian. It would be very interesting to
know if any of the native species are cultivated in Australian gardens.

Fitzgerald believed there were a few native hybrids, and he made some
experiments in hybridising, but we .do not know with what results.

ORCHIDS AT VENTIMIGLIA,
A VERY successful attempt is being made in the well-known gardens of La
Mortola, situated between Mentone and Ventimiglia, to grow Orchids in the
Open air, by fastening them on to the bark of living trees and old tree
stumps, and possibly a few notes taken during a recent visit may be of
interest to readers of the Orchid Review.

It is obvious that, considering the climate of the Italian Riviera is not
extremely warm, the best success is obtained from those Orchids requiring
Cool house cultivation in this country. The collection comprises several
Oncidiums, including brevifolium, crispum, dasytyle, Forbesii, incurvum,
and maculatum, whilst a strong plant of the first-named was producing a
branched panicle of over fifty flowers. Several nice healthy pieces of
Odontoglossum crispum and O. triumphans, Ccelogyne cristata, and
Dendrobium superbiens were also noted. But undoubtedly the Orchids
which succeed best in this district are Lelia anceps and albida. Several
Plants of the former were pushing up their long slender flower spikes.

This magnificent garden was planted many years ago by the late Sir
Thomas Hanbury, and is chiefly celebrated for its splendid collection of
Cacti and Succulents. Mons. A. Berger, the able curator, is very sanguine
as to the prospects of being able to possess a representative collection of
Orchids, and as soon as it is seen that those already obtained can be
Successfully cultivated a greater number will be procured.

C. ALwyn HARRISON.

154 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

SCHOMBURGKIA WALLISII.

In 1877 Reichenbach described a New Grenadan Orchid, from dried
specimens collected by Gustav Wallis, under the name of Bletia
(Schomburgkia) Wallisii (Limnaa, xli. p. 116), with the alternative name
of Schomburgkia Wallisii, ‘‘ pro hortis,’’ but the species appears to have
been lost sight of ever since. It was said to have ligulate, undulate sepals
and petals, and a three-lobed lip, with obtuse side lobes and an oblong
acute front lobe, with a broad depressed keel on the disc. The flowers
were said to be of the size of S. marginata, and yellowish brown in the dried
state. A Schomburgkia has now flowered at Kew which has the characters
of the lost species. It was sent by M. Patin, from New Grenada, under
the name of Cattleya Deckeri, but proves different. It bears a very general
resemblance to the Venezuelan S. Lueddemannii Prill (Bot. Mag., t. 8427),
but the lip is different in structure and colour, having broad obtuse side
lobes and a very acute front lobe, while the apex of all the lobes is brown
in colour. The disc is very convex behind the yellow crest, but terminates
in a sudden depression just above the base. The plant is also much like S.
Lueddemannii in habit, having clavate pseudobulbs eight to ten inches
long, and bearing two leaves from twelve to fifteen inches long. It is
interesting to recognise the plant after so long an interval. R.A. .R.

THE ROMANCE OF ORCHID HunTING.—Mrs. G. B. Wilson, Philadelphia,
writes :—“ Regarding your article at page 45,1 should like to confirm the
remark: ‘The writer does not believe that either one of the collectors
mentioned told the stories as published,’ &c., &c. In probably go per cent.
of the newspaper and other articles concerning my collection the material
was furnished by some one of my gardeners. The articles have appeared
to me quite as ridiculous as they did to your contributor.”

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on April 1st, when there was a fine display of Orchids, and
the awards consisted of seven medals, five First-class Certificates, three
Awards of Merit, and one Cultural Commendation.
Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair); Messrs.
J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, R. A. Rolfe, J..S. Moss, J. Wilson
Potter, F. Sander, A. McBean, W. Waters Butler, F. M. Ogilvie, W. Cobb,
J. Charlesworth, J.. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, H. G. Alexander, W. oF
Bound, A. Dye, W..H. White, C. J. Lucas, S. W. Flory, W. Bolton, F. J-
Hanbury, de Barri Crawshay, and F. Peeters, visitor.

May, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 155

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), staged
a fine group, to which a Silver Flora Medal was awarded. It contained
some good blotched seedling Odontoglossum crispum, hybrids of O.
Edwardii, Oncidium concolor, Chondrorhyncha Chestertonii, Epidendrum
Wallisii and E. Stamfordianum, Cattleya Triane, Cirrhopetalum appendic-
ulatum and Mastersianum, Zygopetalum Perrenoudii, and some good
Leliocattleyas.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), received a
Silver Banksian Medal for a good group, including the pretty little
Odontioda heatonensis, O. Patricia (Odontioda Charlesworthii x Odonto-
glossum Phcebe), white, with large red-brown blotches and much yellow on
the lip, O. Bohnhoffiz, Bradshawie, Vuylstekeze and Goodsoniz, Odonto-
glossum armainvillierense Dayanum, O. Vuylstekei, O. Dixonie (Edwardii
xX Wilckeanum), and others.

W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield, Edgbaston, sent Cattleya Tityus
Southfield var., a very handsome form.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
sent Odontioda Bradshawie marginata, and a fine spike of the South
African Lissochilus speciosus, with eight yellow flowers.

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent
Odontoglossum Dirce (harvengtense X armainvillierense), very heavily
blotched with dark purple.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent Cattleya Schroederz
Davidson’s var., a large blush white form.

John’S. Moss, Esq., Wintershill Hall, Bishops Waltham (gr. Mr.
Kench), showed Odontioda Bradshawiz ardens, a very large scarlet form,
bearing a splendid spike.

F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford (gr. Mr. Balmforth), showed
the handsome Odontoglossum Ossulstonii Shrubbery var.

C. J. Phillips, Esq., The Glebe, Sevenoaks, sent the handsome
Odontioda Royal Gem (Odontioda Vuylsteke# x Odontoglossum armain-
villierense), a pretty cream white form tinged with pink and very regularly
spotted with red, and Odontoglossum Valeria Glebe var. (Edwardii x
Vuylstekei), a dark claret-coloured flower tipped with rose.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Odontioda Cooksoniz
Ralli’s var., and a fine O. Charlesworthii with three flower spikes.

Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Beardwood, Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton),
showed a plant of the rare and handsome Cymbidium Parishii.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group,
including the handsome Leliocattleya Dominiana Orchidhurst var., a
pretty hybrid from L.-c. Doris and Cattleya. Schreedere, having apricot
yellow flowers and a crimson lip, Zygopetalum Armstrongiz, Cypripedium

156 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

Rossetti, Dendrobium nobile virginale, D. Wardianum, a pretty yellow
form of D. Wiganie (sigmatum xX _ nobile virginale), Odontioda rose-
fieldiensis, and a very distinct hybrid from O. Vuylstekez x Cochlioda
sanguinea, Odontoglossum Andersonianum, O. Rolfez Xx armainvillierense,
O. polyxanthum: x Rolfez, O. crispum Kinlesideanum, Brassocattleyas.
and Brassolzlias (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a oa group, including
numerous good forms of Cattleya Schreedere, many plants of Renanthera
Imschootiana, Scuticaria Hadwenti, Vanda ccerulescens, Odontonia St.
Alban, some good Odontiodas, Megaclinium maximum, Zygopetalum
Perrenoudii, Pholidota ventricosa, a plant of Cymbidium I’Ansonii,
introduced from Annam, a pretty hybrid from Cypripedium glaucophyllum
and C. Niobe Westonbirt var., &c. (Silver Flora Medal).

Mr. S. Flory, Tracy’s Nursery, Twickenham, staged a good group,
including fine examples of Dendrobium Wardianum, Cattleya Schroedere
and var. alba, C. intermedia, Saccolabium ampullaceum, Lycaste Skinneri,
Trichopilia. suavis, Bulbophyllum pavimentatum, Pleurothallis Grobyi, P.
tridentata, Restrepia elegans, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a good group,
including some well-flowered. Dendrobium Wardianum, aureum, and
chessingtonense, Oncidium concolor, Cattleya intermedia alba, C.
Schroedere, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a small group, including some
good forms of Cattleya Schroedere and Mendelii, two plants of C.
Lueddemanniana Stanleyi, Lzliocattleya Gottoiana, Brassocattleya M aronii
and Lycaste Tunstillit (Bronze Banksian Medal).

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, staged a small group, including
some finely-grown Cattleya Schreedere, C. Brenda, Leliocattleya Ganymede
var. Hermes, Miltonia Bleuana, a richly-coloured Odontioda Lambeauiana,
some finely-blotched Odontog loasuay crispum, and O. triumphosum
(cirrhosum X_ triumphans).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, showed Leeliocattleya Boylei
Langley variety, a pretty blush white form, and Brassocatlelia Medina.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

BRASSOCATTLEYA HEATONENSIS VAR. Canary (C, Hardyana x B.
Digbyana).—A beautiful variety, having light yellow sepals and petals, and
a paler lip with some purple markings at the base. The plant bore two
spikes of three flowers each. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford,
K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

CympBipiuM HuMBLotil.—A stately Madagascar species, with arching
leaves and an erect panicle five feet high, with six side branches and about
110 green and black flowers. Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

May, 1912.] THE ORCHID REVIEW.

157

CYPRIPEDIUM ROUNDHEAD (Earl of Tankerville x nitens).—A hand-
some hybrid, with a nearly circular flower of great substance, having a
greenish yellow dorsal sepal with large chocolate brown blotches and a

Fig. 31. CYPRIPEDIUM ROUNDHEAD.

‘road white margin, and the petals and lip yellowish tipped with brown
Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford (fig. 31, which is reproduced from
@ photograph kindly sent to us by the exhibitor).

188 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Mays 1913

L#LIOcATTLEYA DOMINIANA SOUTHFIELD var. (L. purpurata Xx. C.
Dowiana aurea).—A remarkably fine form, having light purple sepals and
petals, and a very broad intense claret purple lip. Exhibited by W.
Waters Butler, Esq., Edgbaston.

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM WARNHAM CounrT VAR. (armainvillierense X
crispum » Lyciani).—A handsome round. flower, with .semarkably broad
sepals and petals, very heavily blotched with reddish purple. Exhibited by
C. J. Lucas, Esq., Warnham Court, Horsham (gr. Mr. Duncan).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA INTERTEXTA JULIETT& (Mossiz alba xX Warneri alba).—A
charming pure white variety, with a light yellow disc to the lip. Exhibited
by M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels.

ODONTIODA COOKSONIZ RALLI’S VARIETY (C. Neetzliana * O. armain-
villierense)—A handsome form, bearing a spike of eighteen fine deep
scarlet flowers with a blush white front to the lip. Exhibited by Pantia
Ralli, Esq.

ODONTIODA KEIGHLEYENSIS ignifica (C. Neetzliana x O. cirrhosum).—A
fine form, with darker scarlet flowers than the original. Exhibited by
Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

CyMBIDIUM HuMBLoTII.—To Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., for the finely-

grown plant mentioned under First-class Certificates.

At the meeting held on April 15th the awards consisted of seven medals,
three First-class Certificates, two Awards of Merit, and one Cultural
Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, J. Wilson Potter, W.
Thompson, F. Sander, F. J. Hanbury, W. Cobb, F. M. Ogilvie, A. McBean,
T. Armstrong, J. Charlesworth, W. H. Hatcher, J. E. Shill, H. G.-
Alexander, W. P. Bound, A. Dye, W. H. White; C. J. Lucas, S. W.
Flory, W. Bolton; C. Cookson, J. S, Moss, de Barri Crawshay, Sir Jeremiah
Colman, Bart., and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Twyford, gained a Silver Flora Medal for a choice
group, including a handsome Leliocattleya Aphrodite, Odontoglossum
armainvillierense xanthotes, Aurora, Nesta, Dora, a handsome O. crispum.
with a claret-coloured blotch on each segment, O. Andersonianum X
amabile, a few good Miltonias, and several brilliant Odontiodas.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), staged a pretty
group, including specimens of Cattleya intermedia alba, Masdevallia ignea,

Odontoglossum crispum xanthotes, and several other good ee

and Odontiodas (Silver Banksian Medal).

May, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 159:

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), sent a noble specimen of Cattleya Schroederze the Baron, and
Odontioda Bradshawiz Holford’s var., a large and brilliant scarlet form.

W. R. Lee, Esq., Plumpton Hall, Heywood.(gr. Mr. Branch), sent
Odontioda Bradshawie Hestia, a very fine scarlet form, with the margin of
the segments rosy lilac, and the apex of the lip cream white, and O.
Evadne, a very pretty hybrid, having a salmon red zone round the base of
the segments, and the rest white, tinged and dotted with rose.

Wm. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange, Stone (gr. Mr. Howes), sent
Odontioda William Thompson, a well-coloured flower, the finely-blotched
Odontoglossum Ilene and Princess Mary, all of unknown parentage, and O.
crispum J. Howes, a good blotched form.

Walter Cobb, Esq., Normanhurst, Rusper (gr. Mr. Salter), sent
Odontioda Bradshawize Cobb’s var.

G. Evans, Esq., Shenstone (gr. Mr. Povey), sent a well-flowered blush-
white Brassocattleya.

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis), sent
Cattleya Robert de Wavrin Fowler’s var., a pretty rose-coloured form of
good shape.

C. Alwyn Harrison, Esq., Oneglia, Italy, exhibited well-flowered plants
of ‘Dendrobium Wardianum, D. nobile, D. crassinode, and its richly-
coloured variety Barberianum.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent
the pretty Brassocatlelia Triune, a yellowish white flower, tinged with
lilac, and the lip suffused with purple.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Lzliocattleya
Dominiana:Ralli’s var., a rosy form with dark purple-crimson lip.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including Miltonioda Ajax, [Epilelia macro-cinnabar, Masdevallia
Troglodytes, Cypripedium concolor Xx exul, of intermediate character,
some brilliant Lzliocattleyas, Odontiodas, Oncidium concolor, Odonto-
glossum Scottianum, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Mr. Sidney Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham, staged a fine group of
Cattleya Schroeder, Odontoglossums, Lzeliocattleyas, Odontioda Charles-
worthii, Chysis bractescens, Saccolabium ampullaceum, Acanthophippium
bicolor, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group of Cattleyas,.
Leliocattleyas, Odontiodas, Odontoglossums, Renanthera Leatoat rae
_ Brassocattleya langleyensis, &c. (Silver Flora Medal). "

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a pretty little group, including
Some well-flowered Trichopilia Backhouseana, Miltonia Bleuana,
Cymbidium Veitchii, Odontoglossums, &c. (Silver Banksian Medal).

160 “THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

Mr. C. F. Waters, Balcombe, staged a good group of Lycaste Skinneri,
showing much variation, with Cattleya Mossiz, C. Mendelii, and a few
Odontoglossums (Bronze Banksian Medal).

Messrs. J. & A. A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent the pretty. Lzliocattleya
Trimyra, Miltonia Bleuana and M. vexillaria memoria G. D. Owen, and
two very richly-coloured forms of Odontioda Vuylstekez.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

BrAssOcATLZLIA KiNG EMPEROR (L.-c. callistoglossa x B.-c. Veitchii).

—A remarkably fine hybrid, eight inches across, the sepals and petals white

tinged with rose, and the lip deep mauve purple with paler margin, and a

yellow disc with some purple at the base. Exhibited by W. R. Lee, Esq.

L&LIOCATTLEYA LUMINOSA Ho.trForp’s var. (L. tenebrosa Walton
Grange var. X C. Dowiana aurea).—A superb form, with the sepals and
petals deep yellow, and the lip uniformly deep purple. Exhibited by
Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

OpDoNTOGLossuM PrscaTorREI Lapy HoLrorp.—A large and very
beautiful variety, with flowers 34 inches across, the sepals tinged with lilac,
the petals with an occasional purple spot, and the lip white with the usual
markings on the crest. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

"MAxILarra FLETCHERIANA.—A fine Peruvian species allied to M.
Hubschii, and having short and broad white segments, with narrow lighter
purple lines, and the lip with some purple markings, and a yellow disc.
Exhibited by Messrs. Sander and Sons.

ODONTOGLOSSUM Mrs. THOMPSON (parentage unknown).—A beautiful
hybrid, having the flowers deeply blotched with violet on a white ground,
and the front of the lip and margin of the fringed petals white. Exhibited
by Wm. Thompson, Esq.

_ CULTURAL COMMENDATION

OponToGLossum Dixoni# (Edwardii x luteopurpureum).—To Mr.
Wm. Balmforth, gr. to F. M. Ogilvie, Esq., The Shrubbery, Oxford, for a
finely-grown plant, having a branched spike over five feet long. It was
exhibited as Odontioda Devossiana, under which name it was purchased.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

At the meeting held on March 2oth, the members of Committe present
were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, Dr.
Hartley, F. A. Hindley, A. J. Keeling, D. McLeod, C. Parker, H. Thorp,
Z. A. Ward, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Gold Medal was awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr.
Weatherby), for an excellent group of Se Miltonias, Brassia
brachiata, and others.

SS

May, 1913.} THE’ ORCHID REVIEW. 161

A Silver-gilt Medal: was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden), for a nicé mixed group of Cattleyas, Dendrobiums, Odonto-
glossums, Odontioda Charlesworthii, Cymbidium insigne, and Renanthera
Imschootiana. . erg ae

A Large Silver Medal was awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Black-
burn (gr. Mr. Lupton), for a fine group of Odontoglossum crispum,
Pescatorei and hybrids, with Leliocattleya Dominiana and a few Cattleyas
and Cypripediums.

A Silver Medal was awarded to F. A. Hindley, Esq., Bradford, for a
good miscellaneous group of Cypripediums, Dendrobium nobile virginale,
Dendrochilum glumaceum, Ccelogyne Massangeana, and Lycaste cruenta.

A Bronze Medal was awarded to the Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a small group of Cypripediums.

A Special Vote of Thanks was given to O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge
Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), for a group of Dendrobium nobile and hybrids,
with Cypripediums and Lycastes in variety, some of the latter carrying
nine and ten flowers.

Other interesting exhibits were staged by O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury
(gr. Mr. Rogers); Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge, and Mr. W. Shackleton,
Great Horton.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Odontioda daltonense (O. Phoebe X C. Noetzliana) ; a good flower, three
inches across, of even colour; from J. H. Craven, Esq., Keighley (gr. Mr.
Corney).

Odontoglossum Rossii majus Ward’s var. ; a large well-set rosy flower,
3¢ inches across; from Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Oncidioda Cooksoniz Ashland’s var. (Oncidium macranthum x C.
Neetzliana) ; flowers of the macranthum shape, bronzy scarlet in colour;
from R. Ashworth, Esq.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Odontoglossum tripudians Ward’s var.; O. crispum Snowball and
- Miltonia vexillaria Cringlewood var. ; all from Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Odontoglossum triumphans Hesperidas, Cattleya Trianz Ida and Odonto-
glossum illustrissimum; from R. Ashworth, Esq.

At the meeting held.on April 3rd the members of Committee present
were: Messrs. Z. A. Ward (in the Chair), J. Cypher, J. Evans, A. Hanmer,
Ax J, Keeling, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, W. Morgan, C. Parker, Wm.
Thompson, H. Thorp, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Gold Medal was awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr.
Weatherby), for an excellent group, a special feature being the Odonto
‘glossums, species and hybrids, and a nice batch of Oncidium concolor.

162 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ May, 1913.

Silver-gilt Medals were awarded to A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
(gr. Mr. Dalgleish); S. Gratrix, Esq., Whalley Range (gr. Mr. Brown);
Wm. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange (gr. Mr. Howes), and Col. ds
Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), for very fine groups.

A large Silver Medal was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch
(gr. Mr. Gilden), for a fine miscellaneous group.

Silver Medals were awarded to W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr.
Branch), for some well-flowered plants of Dendrobium Wardianum ; to S.
Gratrix, Esq., tor the handsome Odontoglossum crispum Samuel Gratrix,
and to Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, for a good mixed group.

Bronze Medals were awarded to the Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a group of Cypripediums, and to Messrs.
A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, for a mixed group.

Interesting exhibits were staged by H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn; Mr.
W. Shackleton, Great Horton, and Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge
Wells, the latter including a promising hybrid from Dendrobium
chessingtonense Xx Ainsworthii.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Odontoglossum eximium Ilene and O. Princess Mary, the latter of
unknown parentage, and of almost solid colour; from Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Brassocattleya Cliftonii magnifica, a magnificent flower of almost perfect
shape, with brilliantly-coloured lip; from W. R. Lee, Esq.

Odontoglossum Harlequin West Point var., a flower with brilliantly-
coloured markings; from S. Gratrix, Esq.

Odontoglossum amabile Fairlight, one of the largest flowers ever placed.
before the Society, fully four inches across, with broad flat lip ; from Col. J.
Rutherford, M.P.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cattleya Gratrixie, Lycaste Fairy Footsteps, Brassocattleya Maronie
West Point var., and Odontoglossum Royal Purple ; all from S. Gratrix, Esq,

Odontoglossum Walton Gem, O. eximium Violetta, O. Wm. Stevens.
O. amabile His Majesty, and O. a. Dorothy; all from Wm. Thompson, Esq-

Leliocattleya Lady Blanche and Odontoglossum Yellow Prince ; both
from Col. J. Rutherford, M.P.

Odontoglossum Purple Queen ; from Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Odontoglossum Thompsonianum Vine House var.; from A. Warburton,
Esq., Haslingden.
GHENT QUINQUENNIAL.

The seventeenth Quinquennial . Horticultural. Exhibition brought
together a magnificent display of Orchids, over half the eighty-nine
classes being filled, though in a good many cases there was only a single

May, I913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 163

exhibit. Many of the groups were very rich and varied, but some of the
details must be left over until our next issue. Judging took place on
April 25th, the Orchid Jury being grouped in three sections, as follows :—

I. Messrs. Baron van Roetzelaer (President), Otto Beyrodt (Secretary),
A. A. Peeters, James O’Brien, Ch. Maron, and F. M. Ogilvie.

2. Messrs. le Chevalier T. J. Quarles van Ufford (President), R. Allen
Rolfe (Secretary), J. S. Moss, Oscar Fanyau, Ch. Dietrich, H. G. Alexander,
H. J. Pitt, Dr. Capart, and F. Peeters.

3- Messrs. Firmin Lambeau (President), Stuart Low (Secretary), Em.
Duchesne, Em. Joly, F. H.-C. Sander, Gurney Wilson, R. le Moinier, and
G. Vincke.

The Show was. opened on April 26th, in fine weather, and an official
visit was paid by their Majesties the King and Queen of the Belgians in
the afternoon, in the presence of a large and brilliant gathering.

The Orchid awards were as follows :—

For the best and most varied collection of exotic Orchids (Amateurs),
the large Gold Medal of special design, offered by His Majesty the King,
was won by M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels, by acclamation and with
felicitations of the Jury.

In a similar class for Nurserymen, the CEuvre d’Art, given by M. F.
Lambeau, President of the Cercle des Orchidophiles belges, was won by M.
Th. Pauwels, Meirelbeke.

For the best and most varied 100 exotic Orchids (Amateurs), the CEuvre
@’Art, value 200 francs, offered by M. L. Tillier, Paris, was won by M.
Charles Dietrich, Anderghem.

In the same class for Nurserymen a similar prize was won by Messrs.
Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, with felicitations of the Jury.

For the best and most varied 50 Orchids (Amateurs), the CEuvre d’Art,
value 150 francs, was won by M, Joseph Hemptinne, St.-Denis-Westrem.

In a similar class for Nurserymen, M. Em. Praet was first, MM. A. and
G. Janssens, Merxem, second, and M. Rene Beheils Van Poucke, St.
Nicolas, third.

For the best and most varied 30 Orchids, the Gold Medal, value roo
francs, was won by M. Th. Pauwels, M. Emile Praet being second.

For a new hybrid (excluding Cattleya, Lelia, and Cypripedium),
the Silver-gilt. Medal was won by M. Firmin Lambeau, with C.

mbeauianum.

For a new bigeneric hybrid, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. F.
Lambeau, with Brassocattleya Princesse Elisabeth var. M. Lambeau.

For the best collection of Orchids trom Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and
Ecuador, the Gold ‘Medal, value fifty francs, was won by M. Maurice
Verdonck, Gentbrugge.

164 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

For the finest collection of Indian Orchids the Gold Medal was won by
M. M. Verdonck, M. Emile Praet being second.

For a collection of 15 specimen Cypripediums (Paphiopedium) and
Selenipediums, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by Madame A. de Schryver-
Block, Gentbrugge.

For a collection of 12 well-flowered Dendrobiums, the Silver-gilt Medal
was won by M. M. Verdonck.

For a collection of 25 well-flowered Dendrobiums, the Gold Medal,
value fifty francs, was won by M. Maurice Verdonck.

For the best collection of 20 Leliocattleyas (Amateurs), the Gold Medal,
value fifty francs, was won by M. M. Henri Vacherot et Leconfle, Boissy-
St.-Leger, France.

For the best Lelia or Leliocattleya hybrid, M. Firmin Lambeau won
the Silver-gilt Medal, by acclamation, with Leliocattleya Firminii var.
Ville de Gand, M.M. Henri Vacherot and Leconfle being second.

For the finest Cattleya hybrid not yet in commerce, M. F. Lambeau
won the Silver-gilt Medal, by acclamation, with Lzeliocattleya Roi Albert
(L.-c. Martinetii x C. Warscewiczii), a very large and richly-coloured
hybrid.

For the best and most varied lot of 50 plants of Odontoglossum crispum
(Amateurs), the Gold Medal, value too francs, was won by M. Joseph
Hemptinne, with felicitations.

In a similar class for Nurserymen, the Gold Medal was won by M. M.
Verdonck.

For the best and most complete collection of Odontoglossums, species
varieties and hybrids, the Gold Medal, value 150 francs, was won by M. Ch.
Maillard, St. André, Lille, France.

For a collection of 12 Odontoglossums obtained from seed, the Gold
Medal, value fifty francs, was won by M. Leon Hye de Crom, Gand.

For the best Odontoglossum crispum obtained from seed the Silver-gilt
Medal was won by M. F. Lambeau, with O. c. Reine Elisabeth.

For the best Odontoglossum hybrid, the Gold Medal, value fifty francs,
was won by M. F. Lambeau, by acclamation and with felicitations, with O-
Ville de Gand.

For the best lot of Phalznopsis, the Gold Medal, value fifty Paks was
won by M. Th. Pauwels, Meirelbeke, M. L. Hoornaert, St. Nicolas, being
second.

For the best and most varied lot of 12 Vandas, Aérides, Angrecums,
and Saccolabiums, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Gust. Vincke-
Dujardin, Bruges, with a group of Vanda tricolor and suavis.

For the best and most varied lot of Oncidiums, the Gold Medal, value
fifty francs, was won MM. Jean Van de Putte & Cie., Ledeberg.

7

May, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 165

For the most varied lot of 50 Orchids, used for cut flowers (each variety
to be represented by 10 examples), the Gold Medal, value 100 francs, was
won by M. M. Verdonck, MM. Jean Van de Putte & Cie., Ledeberg, being
second.

For the most beautiful Aérides M. Th. Pauwels won the Silver-gilt
Medal with A. Houlletianum.

For the best Cattleya, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau, with C. intermedia alba x C. Schroederz alba, bearing three
racemes of white flowers.

For the best Coelogyne the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau, M. Th. Pauwels being second, both staging C. pandurata.

For the best Cymbidium the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau, with C. Humblotii, M. Jos. de Hemptinne being second with an
immense specimen of C.,Lowianum.

For the best Cymbidium hybrid the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M.
Th. Pauwels, Meirelbeke, with C. Pauwelsii var. André.

For the best Cypripedium, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th.
Pauwels, Meirelbeke, with C. Alcibiades var. Roi Albert.

For the best Dendrobium, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. M.
Verdonck, with D. thyrsiflorum bearing twelve racemes, Sir Jeremiah
Colman being second with D. Lady Colman

For the best Epidendrum the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th.
Pauwels, Meirelbeke, with Epidendrum radicans.

For the best Lycaste the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th. Pauwels,
with L. Skinneri alba, MM. Jean Van de Putte & Cie., being second.

For the best Masdevallia the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th.
Pauwels, Meirelbeke, with a fine specimen of M.° Pourbaixii, M. Jos. de
Hemptinne being second with M. ephippium.

For the best plant of Odontoglossum crispum a Silver Medal of the First-
Class was won by Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., with a charming rosy variety.

For the best Odontoglossum other than O. crispum, the Silver-gilt
Medal was won by M. Firmin Lambeau with O. luteopurpureum.

For the best Oncidium the Silver-gilt Medal was won by MM. Jean
Van de Putte & Cie, Ledeberg, with a very fine O. Cavendishianum.

For the best Odontioda the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau with felicitations, with the magnificent O. Coronation, Sir
Jeremiah Colman being second with O. Bradshawiz.

For the best Phalznopsis the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau with P. amabilis, M. Hoornaert being second.

For the finest Phaius, a Silver Medal of the First-class was won by M.
Th. Pauwels, with P. Norman.

(To be concluded.)

166 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

FLoweERs of two. very diverse and pretty seedlings from Odontoglossum
polyxanthum x. Rolfez are sent from the collection of E: H. Davidson,
Esq., Twyford. One has pale yellow flowers, with very large red-brown
blotches on the sepals, an occasional small spot on the petals, and a rather
small lip with a large red-brown blotch, while the other is more yellow,
with darker brown spots on all the segments, and the lip very large, rounded
and slightly concave.

OponTiopa Aspasta.—A very distinct hybrid raised by Messrs.
Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, from Odontioda Vuylstekez X
Cochlioda sanguinea. It has rather broad whitish sepals and petals, with
large rose-purple blotches, and a narrow white lip with a large rosy blotch
at the apex, and a few small spots round the whitish toothed crest.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
THE next meeting of the Royal Horticultural’ Society will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, on Wednesday
{not Tuesday), May 14th, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual
hour, 12 o’clock noon.

The next meeting is the Great Spring Show, to be held in the Royal
Hospital Gardens, Chelsea, on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, May
21st, 22nd, and 23rd.’ Class 1 is: devoted to Orchids, and Silver Cups and
Medals will be awarded according to merit. The Orchid Committee will
meet in the Committee Tent at 10.30 a.m. Single plants for Certificate
may be entered up to May 15th.

A meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will
be held at the Coal Exchange; Manchester, on May Ist, on which day the
Annual Meeting will also be held at 2.30 p.m. The Committee meets at
noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection from I to 4 p.m.

R.H.S. Screntiric CoMMITTEE.—The following references to Orchids
exhibited at meetings of the Committee are taken from the official report
{continued from page 103) :—

February 4th :—

Lz#2uia Lunpu (Rchb. f. & Warm).—Mr. R. A. Rolfe exhibited, 00

behalf of Messrs. Sander & Sons, a plant of this dwarf Brazilian species,
remarking that it is allied to L. Regnellii, but is easily separated by ts
habit of flowering on the undeveloped growth, a character which it shares
with Cattleya Walkeriana. The leaves are narrow and fleshy, and the
flowers solitary, pale lilac with a veined blotch on the front lobe of the lip.
It is quite unlike any other Lelia in cultivation. Its history is given 1"
the Orchid Review (xviii. p. 62).

May, 1913,] THE QRCHID REVIEW. 167

ONcIDIODA CooKson1#.—The Orchid Committee referred the plant
Oncidioda X Cooksoniz to this Committee. It had been exhibited by
Messrs. Charlesworth. The cross is rather a curious one between
Cochlioda Neetzliana ? and Oncidium macranthum ¢, and the hybrid
has something of the long raceme of the pollen parent, while the flowers
are larger than the seed parent and somewhat different in colour. It was
first raised by Mr. Cookson. A Botanical Certificate was unanimously
recommended to the plant.

March 4th :—

ODONTOGLOssUM SATURNE.—Mons. H. Graire, of Amiens, showed this
curious hybrid between O. nebulosum and O. Harryano-crispum. _ It closely
resembles O. nebulosum in the form of the flowers, which are white, closely
spotted with light brown and rose.

OponToniA CyBELE.—Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. showed this cross
between Odontoglossum cirrhosum and Miltonia candida grandiflora. Mr.
O’Brien showed illustrations of both the parents, and called attention to the
fact that the tabular labellum of Miltonia candida did not appear in the
slightest degree, the broadly ovate-spathulate labellum of the hybrid being
perfectly flat. The colouring of the petals and sepals (broad bands of
brown) were from the Miltonia, but the apiculate reflexed tips of the
segments were as in Odontoglossum cirrhosum. The dark red lines
characteristic of cirrhosum also appeared at the base of the labellum. A
Certificate of Appreciation was awarded to Messrs. Charlesworth.

VARIATION IN SEEDLINGS.—Mr. G. Wilson showed flowers of two
Orchid hybrids from the same seed pod. They were totally different in
colour, one being ofa brick red and the other white with a few red spots.

April 15th:

OponTiopa Patricta.—Mr. R. A. Rolfe exhibited paintings and flowers
from five seedlings obtained by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. from Odontioda
Charlesworthii (Cochlioda Neetzliana x Odontoglossum Harryanum)
crossed by Odontoglossum Phoebe (O. cirrhosum xX O. crispum), and
showing a remarkable range of colour variation from the same capsule,
Two were of a peculiar shade of dark claret red, and another brilliant
orange brown, these being self-coloured except for a little yellow on the lip.
A fourth was yellow with large transverse red blotches, and a fifth claret
purple with a darker mottling. The differences in shape were not great
except in the lip, the fourth being most like the Odontioda parent and the
others more deltoid, as in the Odontoglossum. Flowers. of both parents
were also shown.

EPIDENDRUM KEWENSE.—Mr. Rolfe also showed a series of paintings
of E. kewense with its parents. and offspring. The bright yellow E-
Xanthinum crossed with the deep purple E. evectum gave the salmon-

168 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1913.

coloured’ E. kewense. ‘The latter, re-crossed with the original purple
species gave purple hybrids with a yellow crest (not a purple crest as in E.
evectum), but re-crossed with the yellow species gave flowers of a reddish
salmon colour, one, however, being more orange-coloured. When E.
kewense was self-fertilised the offspring showed a gradation between the
deep yellow of E. xanthinum through various shades of salmon to cerise
and light rosy purple. The two extremes were primrose yellow (much
lighter than E. xanthinum), and clear purple with a white crest touched
with yellow in the centre. It was explained that primary hybrids are fairly
uniform in character because the reproductive cells (pollen and embryos) of
the parent species which unite to form them are uniform, but a hybrid,
being a mosaic and combining two distinct ancestries, does not form
reproductive cells of uniform character. Incompatability comes into play,
and ancestral characters that do not blend are represented in these cells in
varying proportions, thus giving rise to that marvellous diversity often seen
among secondary hybrids. A series of quantitative differences was apparent
in the flowers shown, the colour being represented in very varying
proportions. Characters or qualities are adaptations, and of varying
degrees of antiquity, and their stability, acquired through a long series of
generations, illustrates what may be termed the persistence of specific
character in organisms.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.
CaTTrLeya A. Dimmock.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 513, with fig.
C@LOGYNE PANDURATA.—Horticulture, 1913, p- 501, with fig.
CymBipium LowIANvM (a specimen).—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 247, with fig-
CyPRIPEDIUM RoUNDHEAD.—Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 230, -fig. TOT.
ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM WARNHAM CouRT VAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913,
p- 235, with fig. ; Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 246, fig. 107.

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

[Orchids ave named a “0 questions of rote as far as possible. Correspondents aré
requested to Pais the native country or parentage of pla An ADDRESSED fostcard must be
ei tif a reply by post ts desired (abroad, vei "isteards apald is used), Subjects of special interest

Il be dealt with in the body of the

H.G.—Lealiocattleya Cappei 4. saasaelia x‘C. Warscewiczii).

C.F.K.—We do not find a record _ this cross. A note is held over.

H.T.P.— Many thanks. Next m

saga notes and articles are coheed postponed through pressure on our space.

We have received from Messrs. Sander Sons, St. Albans, an interleaved copy ° of
ee pytes of Orchid apiteSiamy Shee , pamphlet list of additions for 1912. The arrangement
is same as in the earlier editi

piteicern RECEIVED. We lise received the Illustrated priced —— _ Orchids
of Messrs, J. & A. M cBean, Cooksbridge, containing a fine selection of species hybrids,

with prices. There is a coloured plate of the handsome Letliocattleya H soe hy with
photographic representations and i of several handsome hybrids, and views in the
establishment.

5 Ep ge eee

)
,

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

Vor. XXI.] JUNE, 1933. [No. 246.

THE R.H.S. CHELSEA SHOW.

THE Spring Show of the R.H.S., so long known as the Temple Show from
its association with the Temple Gardens, and which was suspended last
year on account of the Royal International Horticultural Exhibition, was
held in the grounds of the Royal Hospital, Chelsea, on May 2oth, 21st, and
22nd, and was a great success. The weather was fine throughout, and the
area available being about trebled not only permitted a great extension of
the exhibits, but also gave increased comfort to visitors, who were present
in large numbers on each of the three days. On the opening day the
Show was visited by Her Majesty Queen’ Alexandra, Princess Victoria, and
the Duchess of Fife, who were evidently delighted with the magnificent
display.

With the Orchids we are alone concerned, and some idea of their extent
and quality may be formed from the awards, which numbered three Gold
and four cther Medals, eight Silver Cups, eight First-class Certificates,
thirteen Awards of Merit, and four Cultural Commendations.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr.
Alexander), staged a magnificent group in a space of about 200 square feet,
to which a Gold Medal was awarded. The plants were splendidly grown
and flowered, and included some beautiful examples of Oncidium Marshall-
ianum, a fine series of Cattleya Mossiz varieties, aggregating about 200
flowers, a fine specimen of C. Skinneri, several good C. Dusseldorfii
Undine, with C. Mendelii, Schroederz, intermedia alba, and others, fine
examples of Lzliocattleya Fascinator, Britannia, Glaucus, luminosa, Gold-
crest, callistoglossa, Hyeana, Ophir, Ballii, and others, many fine Miltonia
vexillaria, Phalaenopsis amabilis, and Renanthera Imschootiana, Brassavola
Digbyana, with a beautiful series ot its hybrids, including Brassocattleya
Euterpe and the fine Brassocatlelia Veitchii, Sophrocatlelia Marathon,
Lycaste Imschootiana, Cymbidium Alexanderi and tigrinum, and a fine
Series of Odontiodas and Odontoglossums, among the latter being O. Acme
(sceptrum x Rolfez), most resembling the former. The group was
beautifully arranged with palms and ferns.

169

470 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JUNE, 1913.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
staged a brilliant group, to which a Silver Cup was awarded. It contained
‘some fine Miltonia vexillaria, a number of brilliant Odontiodas, including
O. Bradshawiz with three immense panicles, the fine varieties Lady
Colman and Gatton Queen, both bright scarlet forms, O. Vuylstekez with
two large panicles, some beautiful examples of Oncidium pulchellum
and macranthum, Zygopetalum rostratum, Brassodiacrium Colmanii,
Dendrobium Victoria-Regina, Physosiphon Loddigesii, a lot of Coelogyne
Parishii, Saccolabium ampullaceum, some brilliant Cattleya Schroedere,
‘Skinneri, and Murrayi, Stelis parvula, and a brilliant series of Odonto-
glossums, including many fine O. Thompsonianum, one having a clear
white ground, O. Queen of Gatton, O. crispum solum and many others.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, staged a choice group,
including some fine forms of Lzeliocattleya Aphrodite, Phalznopsis
amabilis, a blush white Cattleya Mendelii, and others, Odontoglossum
crispum xanthotes, O. c. Luciani and other blotched forms, Odontiodas,
&c., with Trichopilia Hennisiana in front (R.H.S. Standard Cup).

W. P. Burkinshaw, Esq., Hessle, Hull (gr. Mr. Barker), sent Cattleya
Lueddemanniana Schroederiana, white, with some purple markings on the
lip, and Miltonia Bleuana Hessle var., with two spikes,

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis), sent
the fine Cymbidium woodhamsianum Fowler’s var., with two racemes.

M. H. Graire, St. Fuscien, sent Odontioda Charlesworthii St. Fuscien,
with a fine spike of twenty flowers.

M. Jules Hye de Crom, Ghent (gr. M. Coen), sent a fine example of
Miltonia Hyeana, bearing large white flowers tinged with rose.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a magnificent
group in a space of 200 square feet, to which a Gold Medal was awarded.
The centre contained many brilliant varieties of Lzliocattleya Fascinator,
L.-c. Dominiana, Sylvia, Golden Glory, Ulysses var. delicata and others,
while on either side was a most brilliant assemblage of Odontoglossums
and Odontiodas, and at either end fine specimens of Miltonia vexillaria
Empress Augusta Victoria and some seedlings from it. We noted also
M. Roezlii, good specimens of Cymbidium Humblotii and Pauwelsil,
Chysis aurea, Odontonia Lairesseze, some good Trichopilia Backhouseana,
Calanthe veratifolia, Phaius Wallichii, Coelogyne pandurata, Oncidium
pulchellum, Epidendrum vitellinum, a well-flowered Masdevallia Courtauld-
jana, Cypripedium bellatulum album and Queen of Spain, Vanda
Charlesworthii and teres, some very fine Cattleyas and Brassocattleyas,
Odontioda Chantecleer, Patricia, Queen Mary, Enchantress, Diana, and
Charlesworthii in numerous examples, with a brilliant series of Odonto-
glossums, noteworthy among them being the.handsome O Empress of

aE RR ing

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 171

India, forms of O. crispum, eximium, and amabile, with O. Phebe,
Harryanum, Aquitania, the yellow O. luteopurpureum Vuylstekeanum,
and O. armainvillierense xanthotes.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, also received a Gold Medal fora
very rich group, in which some of the showy things were massed in front
of a very high and effective background, while the centre and side
elevations were arranged in pyramidal fashion, with intervening dells.
Cattleyas and Leeliocattleyas formed a brilliant assemblage, with good
forms of Cymbidium Pauwelsii, Schroederi, and Gottianum, Phalzenopsis
amabilis, Brassocattleya mirabilis (C. Mendelii x B.-c. Leemanniz), many
fine Miltonia vexillaria and Bleuana, Odontonia St. Alban, O. Roger
Sander, and O. Lairessez solum (M. Warscewiczii x O. crispum solum),
with a very dark lip, a very fine Cattleya Suzanne Hye de Crom, Maxillaria
Fletcheri, Lycaste peruviana, Scuticaria Hadwenii, Coelogyne integerrima,
Anguloa Clowesii, Bollea Lalindei, Aérides Houlletianum, Brassavola
fragrans, Masdevallia Estrada, Saccolabium gemmatum, Dendrobium
Leeanum ampliatum, and many other rare and botanical species, with a
brilliant series of Odontiodas and Odontoglossums.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, were awarded a Silver
Cup for a brilliant group of 200 square feet, which was well carried up
behind, and undulate in front. At the back two fine examples of Ceelogyne
Dayana stood well up on pedestals, with Cymbidium Lowianum, some fine
Phalzenopsis amabilis and Lelia purpurata, many Lzliocattleya Fascinator,
Aphrodite, and Hyeana, Dendrobium chessingtonense, some fine Brasso-
cattleyas, Ccelogyne pandurata, a well-flowered Cattleya Skinneri alba,
Sophronitis grandiflora, some fine Miltonia Bleuana, St. Andre and
vexillaria, the latter including the handsome var. memoria G. D. Owen,
Bulbophyllum Ericssonii, Pescatorea cerina, Maxillaria tenuifolia, Cypri-
pedium Faire-Maud, C. villosum x. bellatulum, and a lot of fine Odonto-
glossums and Odontiodas.

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, received a Silver Cup for
a very fine group, containing many good forms of Lelia purpurata, Cattleya
Mossiz and Schroedere, a brilliant lot of Lzeliocattleyas, including L.-c.
Hyeana splendens with twenty-eight flowers, Epidendrum O’Brienianum
and Boundianum, Masdevallia rosea, Courtauldiana, Veitchiana, and
ionocharis, Cypripedium callosum Sandere and Maudie, some excellent
Miltonia vexillaria, Vanda teres and ccerulescens, Renanthera Imschoot-
jana, Maxillaria Sanderiana, Diacrium bicornutum, Ccelogyne Dayana,
Dendrobium Thwaitesie, some well-flowered Brassocattleyas, and a
beautiful series of Odontoglossum crispum and others.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, received a Silver Cup for a
handsome group, the centre of which was largely made up of Renarthera

172 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Junn, 1913.

Imschootiana and Phalznopsis amabilis, forming a brilliant contrast, while
in front were many fine Cattleya Mendelii and Schroederz, with white and
coloured C. Mossiz, C. citrina, Oncidium Marshallianum, concolor,
undulatum and Cavendishianum, Brassia verrucosa, Dendrobium
chrysotoxum, Dearei, dixanthum, Brymerianum, thyrsiflorum and
densiflorum, Stanhopea tigrina, a well-flowered Bifrenaria Harrisonize
pubigera, Vanda Charlesworthii, and some good Odontoglossums.

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, received a Silver Cup for a
large and handsome group, including a very fine series of well-grown
Odontogiossum crispum, O. c. xanthotes, O. armainvillierense, Gladys,
Pheebe, O. sceptrum aureum, O. luteopurpureum Vuylstekeanum with four
racemes, O. amabile Princess, O. Uroskinneri splendens, Cattleya Suzanne
Hye de Crom, a fine series of C. Mossiz and Mendelii, Brassocattleya
Mendelosa (B. nodosa X C. Mendelii), Oncidium macranthum, Miltonia
Phalznopsis, a fine lot of M. vexillaria, and numerous Odontiodas, including
Bradshawiez, Lambeauiana, Charlesworthii and Vuylstekez, these being
chiefly massed in the front of the group.

Messrs. Mansell & Hatcher, Rawdon, E. Yorks, received a R.H.S.
Standard Cup for a large and effective group, arranged in three prominent
banks with intervening dells. The centre consisted largely of Renanthera
Imschootiana and Miltonia vexillaria, and the sides contained a lot of well-
flowered Lzliocattleyas, while between were many excellent Odontoglossums,
Cattleyas, &c. We noted good examples of Trichopilia Backhouseana,
Brassocattleya Leemanniz, Acineta Humblotii, two fine Schomburgkia
Wallisii, Epidendrum aromaticum, Angraecum Sanderianum, Lycaste
aromatica, Masdevallia Imogen, Physosiphon Loddigesii, a Goodyera with
white-veined leaves, that came with Phalenopsis amabilis, Dendrobium
Apollo, Odontoglossum citrosmum album, Pheebe, and various others.

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, received a Silver-gilt Medal for a
good group, including a series of Odontoglossums and Odontiodas, Cattleya
Skinneri alba with over twenty flowers, C. Dusseldorfii Undine, C. Mossiz,
C. Schroedere alba, some fine Miltonia vexillaria and Renanthera
Imschootiana, Oncidium pulchellum, a good Dendrobium Bronckattii,
Leliocattleya Ballii, and various others.

Mr. Sidney Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham, received a Silver
Flora Medal for a good group, including many fine Cattleyas and
Odontoglossums, Lzlia purpurata and the white L. p. Queen Alexandra,
Lycaste Deppei, Odontoglossum platychilum, Miltonia Roezlii, a well
flowered Masdevallia O’Brieniana, a nice batch of Ancectochili, and 4
series of Trichopilia Backhouseana in front,

Mr. Harry Dixon, Spencer Park Nursery, Wandsworth Common,
received a Silver Banksian Medal for a good group of Odontoglossums,

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 173

Miltonia vexillaria, Cattleya Skinneri alba and intermedia, Brassolelia
Jessopti, Epidendrum ~ Boundii, Ccelogyne» pandurata, Cypripedium
bellatulum, Cymbidium Lowianum concolor, Odontoglussum Thompson-
ianum, and other Odontoglossums.

Mr. C. F. Waters, Balcombe, received a Silver Banksian Medal fora
group composed chiefly of Odontoglossum crispum and Pescatorei, with a
few Cattleya Mendelii and Mossiz, Renathera Imschootiana, Lycaste
Skinneri, Masdevallia Houtteana, Oncidium leucochilum, and Cyyripedium
niveum and bellatulum.

Mr. J. Evans, Manor House, Key Green, sent Odontoglossum Evansiz
and O. Ruby Gem, two handsomely blotched hybrids.

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a number of Orchids
in their Gold Medal group of Stove and Greenhouse plants, including some
good Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas and Odontoglossums, Disa Luna, Lelia
cinnabarina, Brassocattleya Morna, Miltonia vexillaria, &c.

ODONTOGLOSSUM LONDESBOROUGHIANUM.
IT is a profound puzzle to several of our Orchid growers why this remark-
able species so seldom flowers in cultivation, and we have been asked for
information of its habitat, in the hope that this may suggest a suitable mode
of treatment. Unfortunately very little is known about it. It was
introduced by Messrs. Backhouse & Sons, of York, and flowered for
the first time in cultivation in the collection of Lord Londesborough,
at Norbiton, Surrey, in December, 1876, when it received a First-
class Certificate from the R.H.S., under the name of Oncidium
Londesboroughianum (Gard. Chron., 1876, ii. p. 756), and although
Reichenbach afterwards described it as Odontoglossum Londesborough-
lanum (i.c., p. 772), we believe that it actually belongs to Oncidium, with
which it agrees better in habit, structural details, and colour. It is a
native of Mexico, and according to Mr. John Day, who figured it in
December, 1879 (Orch. Draw., xxv. t. 73), was introduced by Messrs.
Backhouse & Sons, in 1870, when both he and Mr. Wilkins, of Leyton,
bought plants. After Mr. Wilkins’ death his collection was sold at
Stevens’ Rooms, and it was this plant which was purchased by Lord
Londesborough, and flowered as above recorded. Mr. Day’s plant died,
and the one figured by him is said to have come “last September from
Messrs. Backhouse, who made a vast importation of it from Mexico last
winter and spring.’’ Messrs. Backhouse state that they do not know the
habitat, though their collector informed them that it grows on shelving
Tocks, fully exposed to the sun, where the temperature rises to 120° F, in
the day time, and falls to 50° F. at night. They believe that they have
received Odontoglossum citrosmum from the same region, if not from the

174 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JUNE, 1913.

identical district (Gard. Chron., 1879, i. p. 342). This would suggest a
position near the roof glass of the Cattleya house, where it would receive
a maximum of light and heat. Owing to its climbing habit a raft forms a
suitable receptacle to grow it on. Its flowers should appear during the

autumn before resting, and its non-flowering may often be due to the fact

—

that the bulbs are not strong enough. The leaves are deciduous, and the

plant requires a good dry rest during the winter months.
ODONTOGLOSSUM GEORGIUS REX.

THE annexed figure represent the handsome Odontoglossnm Georgius Rex,

for which Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, received an

Fig. 32. ODONTOGLOSSUM GEORGIUS REx.

Award of Merit at the recent R.H.S. Show at Chelsea, and is reproduced
from a photograph kindly sent by the exhibitors. It is said to be a hybrid
from O. Rolfeze crossed with some blotched O. Harryanum hybrid, but
which one is uncertain. It bore a very fine inflorescence of magnificent
flowers, whose shape is well shown in the figure, while the markings are
dark claret colour ona white ground, slightly suffused with rose. The lip
is good in shape and colour, and the hybrid is altogether a fine acquisition.

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 175,

ODONTOGLOSSUM CORADINEI.
Ir is interesting to record that Odontoglossum Coradinei has been raised
artificially, or at all events a hybrid from O. Lindleyanum x crispum
which has long been the accepted parentage of this plant. The doubt lies
in the difficulty in ascertaining the actual origin of O. Coradinei. This
plant was originally described and figured by Reichenbach over forty years
ago (Gard. Chron., 1872, p. 1068, fig. 251), as a beautiful thing—probably
a hybrid between O. triumphans and some species of the group of O.
odoratum. It was gathered by Messrs. Chesterton and Coradine, and was
exhibited some time previously at a meeting of the R.H.S. by Messrs.
James Veitch & Sons. The flowers were said to be sulphur yellow, with a
large brown blotch on the lip, and one or two others on each of the sepals
and petals. A plant with such a parentage could not then have appeared
among QO. crispum, but there is the possibility that the origin was incorrectly
interpreted. At all events, O. Lindleyanum and O. crispum ultimately
became the accepted parents, and many natural hybrids showing the
character of these two species are now known, though it must be admitted
that they do not agree very well with the original figure. — They, however,
differ greatly among themselves. The point may be cleared up when the
Reichenbachian Herbarium is opened. Jt was in the hope of throwing
light on this matter that, in June, 1997, I crossed O. Lindleyanum (a rather
poor form being the only one available) with the pollen of an unblotched
O. crispum, and the first of a small batch of seedlings has now flowered at
Kew. The seedling is most like O. Lindleyanum in character, having a
long column with narrow wings, a long-stalked, sharply reflexed narrow lip,
with a solid brown blotch in front, and rather narrow yellow sepals and
petals, with a few round brown spots. Of course the seedling is not yet
fully developed, and it will be interesting to see what variations there are

among the other seedlings.

RITAIA HIMALIACA.
A PLANT of this curious little Himalayan Orchid was recently received at
Kew, and is now flowering. It was described by King and Pantling some
years ago (Ann. R. Bot. Gard. Calc., viii. p. 156, t. 214) as a new genus.
nearly allied to Appendicula, but differing in habit and in various structural
details. It was dedicated to Mr. Rita, of the Khasia Commission, who had
assisted the authors in their work. Ceratostylis himalaica, Hook. f. (Fl.
Brit. Ind., v. p. 157; Hook. Ic. Plant., t. 2101) was cited as synonymous.
A comparison of the plant, however, shows that it is a true Ceratostylis,
and far removed from Appendicula. The plant forms a pendulous mass
several inches long, the stems being somewhat branched, and bearing

176 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913.

pendulous leaves of lanceolate shape, while the flowers are borne in the
axils of the leaves, and are usually solitary and not at all conspicuous.
They are under + inch in diameter, and white-tomentose behind, somewhat
resembling an Eria, while the colour is whitish green, with purple margins
to the petals, and the swollen apex of the lip yellow. The pollinia are
eight in number, clavate, equal, and attached to a small mass of white
viscous matter. The species is a native of -Eastern Nepal, Bhotan, the
Khasia . Hills, and Sikkim, in the latter occurring at Tendong, at 5000 feet
elevation. I had not previously seen it alive. i. Ask,
Se caiaelon

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM VAR. PRINCESS MARY.
WE have received from Messrs. Wm. Bull & Sons, Chelsea, the photograph
here reproduced of the beautiful Odontoglossum crispum var. Princess

Fig. 33. ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM VAR. PRINCESS MARY.
Mary, a seedling raised by them, and whi
out of a batch of 300 to 4oo seedlings from the same seed pod.
1es large and distinct,

ch is said to have been the best

segments are broad and well fringed, and the blotct
and of a clear claret colour, with a broad white margin to the petals and
lip. The seedling is said to be six years old. On May 17th the raisers, by
Royal Command, had the honour of showing this beautiful variety
Royal Highness at Buckingham Palace, and we learn that it will in future

L

grace the Royal Collection.

The

to Her

JuNE, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 177

ODONTONIA CHOLLETII.
THE annexed figure represents a very striking hybrid, raised by Messrs.
Sander & Sons, Bruges, from Odontoglossum Harryanum crossed with the
pollen of Miltonia vexillaria. The plant may be described as fairly
intermediate in habit, but the leaves show the influence of the pollen
parent in shape and colour, and the flower is also most like the Miltonia
in general character. We saw several seedlings at Bruges, including the
one that bloomed last year, which is now bearing a capsule, the aim being
to get a batch of secondary hybrids from such a promising plant. Messrs.

Fig. 34. ODONTONIA CHOLLETII.

Sander, however, had a flower painted by F. Bolas, which they have kindly
lent to us to photograph and illustrate. The flower, as will be seen, has
the expanded shape and broad lip of the Miltonia parent. The ground
colour may be described as white, suffused with light purple, and the
markings crimson-purple, with here and there shades of brown. The large
blotch at the base of the lip, which appears dark in the figure, is deep
Orange colour. The column is short, as in the Miltonia parent. The
markings on the basal half of the lip resemble those usually seen in hybrids
of Odontoglossum Harryanum, but there is a purple suffusion in front of

178 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913-

these which has not come out in the photograph. It is a handsome hybrid,
and should develop into a fine thing when the plant becomes strong. It is
named after M. Chollet, Messrs. Sander’s able hybridist at Bruges. We
know of only one other hybrid with which it is at all comparable, namely,
Odontonia Vuylstekei (O.R., xviii. p. 209), raised by M. Ch. Vuylsteke
from Miltonia vexillaria and Odontoglossum amabile, which is very nearly
allied, for the Miltonia parent is common to both, while Odontoglossum
amabile is partly derived from O. Harryanum. Odontonia Firminii (M.-
vexillaria X O.crispum), though somewhat similar in shape, is very different
in colour. A promising development would be the intercrossing of M.
vexillaria with some of the large and very highly-coloured hybrid Odonto-
glossums now in existence.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.

By C. Atwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
DurinG this and the following months, one of the main items in the
cultivation of Cool Orchids is to keep the temperature within the limit of
65° F., and should the weather prove hot this isa matter of some difficulty,
but the following hints may be of help to a beginner: Keep the house well
saturated with moisture, damping down usually three times daily, at ten
a.m., midday, and again in the afternoon. Lower the blinds about ten, and
do not raise them until the sun is not shining on the house. Admit as
much air as possible by means of the top and bottom ventilators, and by
these means it will be found that the internal temperature of the house can
be kept near the prescribed degree.

Although not of vital importance, I am strongly in favour of having the
blind raised a few inches above the roof glass, as by this method a free
current of air can pass between this and the glass, thus enabling the latter
to be kept cooler than would otherwise be possible.

All plants in flower and actively growing must be kept well supplied
with water, and a dose may probably be needed once a day, but any which
are passing out of bloom and entering upon their season of rest must be
kept drier, merely giving sufficient to kept the compost moist, not wet.

Odontoglossum grande will now be starting into growth, and should be
repotted, using a mixture of two parts osmunda fibre to one each of oak
leaves and sphagnum moss. Place the plant at the warmest end of the
house and in such a position that it will get plenty of light. Pot fairly
firmly, and be careful to see that the base of the bulbs is not buried in the
compost, but is slightly above it. In my opinion, however, it is now too
hot to repot other species and hybrids of Odontoglossum. I prefer to defer
it until the beginning of September, when a better start will be made.
Thrips are liable to be troublesome now that the warmer weather has set

June, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 179)

in, and a sharp watch must be kept for any appearance of these insects..
Should any be present, fumigate with tobacco powder, having removed
previously any plants which are in flower, or just bursting their buds.

Cymbidiums should now be rooting well, and may receive liquid cow
manure once a week. Since these Orchids are such vigorous rooting
subjects, and owing to their disliking frequent repotting, I am convinced
that some stimulant is necessary to encourage them, and liquid manure
has been found eminently satisfactory. An application of this should be,.
however, immediately followed by a dose of pure rain water.

CYPRIPEDIUM FRANKEANUM.
WHEN the natural hybrid Paphiopedilum Frankeanum was described five
years ago (O.K., xvi. p. 29) the history of its two parents, P. Curtisii and P.
tonsum, was given, showing that the latter originally appeared quite
accidentally in an importation of the former, which it resembled so closely
in the foliage as not to have been recognised until it bloomed. We could
not then find a record that the cross between the two had been made in
gardens, and remarked ‘“‘ we hope it will now be attempted.” At the
Brussels Botanic Garden a few days ago M. Gentil showed us a seedling in
bloom that had been obtained from C. Curtisii crossed with the pollen of
C. tonsum, and also gave us a flower, which agrees well with the natural
hybrid sent by M. Theodore Franke. The leaves bear a general resemb-.
lance to the original P, Curtisii, whose characters on the whole predominate
in the flower, though the petals are not so drooping, the blackish spots few
in number and not regularly arranged, and the hairs on the upper margin.
rather longer and much less numerous, characters also noted in the wild
hybrid. The dorsal sepal is shortly acuminate, and closely striped with
purple and green, and the lip has rather more of the tonsum character. It
is very interesting to have the origin of the plant proved experimentally.
R. A.

Ke
ORCHIDS AT KEW.
THE Orchid Houses at Kew are looking very gay just at present, there
being quite a good display of flowers, both in the warm and cool divisions.
A number of botanical species may be seen in bloom, a few of the most
interesting being as follows :—

Promenza xanthina is a charming little Cool house subject, and grows-
best when suspended from the roof-glass in pans. The flowers are bright
citron-yellow, spotted with red on the side lobes of the lip.

Kefersteinia graminca is a very rare plant, allied to the preceding. It
has no pseudobulbs, and the leaves are five to nine inches long, and the
Scapes about five inches high, the sepals and petals being light yellowish.

1180 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913.

-green, with lines of brownish-red spots, and the lip yellowish spotted with
ed-purple. A plant of Stelis muscifera, grown in a five-inch pan, has
‘thirty-eight erect spikes, with from twenty to thirty brownish-red flowers on
each.

A good plant of Pleurothallis Birchenallii is flowering on almost every
-growth, the dark red flowers being very large, and recalling those of P.
scapha. It is an exceptionally good grower. Physosiphon Loddigesii is
-another very floriferous Cool house subject. The plant is growing in a six-
inch pan, and has no fewer than forty-six spikes, with about twenty
yellowish-brown flowers on each spike.

There are also many interesting Masdevallias in flower, M. Schlimii
ibeing especially fine. The plant is bearing a dozen spikes, with five flowers
on each. M. tridactylites is a curious little plant that is flourishing. The
stems are very slender, and the flowers are curious in shape. The upper
‘sepal is yellow and red, and the lower sepals purplish-red, with clear
yellow lateral tails. Masdevallia O’Brieniana is quite a dwarf of the genus,
‘but it is very free flowering. The flowers are borne on short stems, and
‘somewhat resemble M. simula, but are larger, and much more yellow.
M. simula is also flowering profusely. Aérides japonicum, like those
-already mentioned, will thrive in the Cool house. It is a diminutive
“species, with short leathery leaves and drooping racemes, each bearing six
or eight whitish flowers, barred and spotted with purple. It is advisable to
‘Suspend this plant from the roof-glass. He ia 3:

ODONTONIA BRUGENSIS.—A remarkable hybrid, raised in the establish-
ment of Messrs. Sander & Sons, Bruges, from Odontoglossum Edwardii
‘crossed with the pollen of Miltonia vexillaria. The plant is most like the
Miltonia in habit, to which it bears a marked approach in the shape and
colour of the leaves, and in having the flowers well expanded and the lip
relatively broad. The example seen bore a short four-flowered scape, which
has now been sent to us. The flowers at present have an expanse of one
-and a quarter inches, and the colour is light violet-purple, with a buff yellow,
oblong, tuberculate crest, and a darker purple zone all round it. The
petals are also darker at the base, and measure four lines across, while the
lip is over half an inch broad, and somewhat pandurate. The column is
most like that of the Miltonia parent, with narrow entire wings. Itis a
‘very distinct and remarkable hybrid, and has obviously not reached its full
development. Indeed, we are told that a form with larger flowers and a
broader lip has previously bloomed. We may add that we saw seedlings of
considerable size from the same cross in the collection of M. Firmin
‘Lambeau a few days earlier, when it was an interesting speculation as to
‘what the flowers would be like.

wenliseiagese

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 181°

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR JUNE.

By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
THE temperatures given for last month will still hold good, likewise such’
details of general management as the ventilation of the houses, watering
the plants, and the amount of atmospheric moisture. Shading must not be-
neglected whenever the sun’s power demands it, as plants are seriously
disfigured, if not killed outright, when allowed to become scorched. Owing:
to the sunlessness of the past two months the climatic conditions have not
been favourable to Orchids, therefore as the plants start every inducement
should be given them to produce healthy and robust growths, for it is much:
easier to keep a healthy plant growing than it is to bring an unhealthy one
back to the normal condition.

FLOWERING PLANTS.—During the summer months it is good practice to
place all plants that are in bloom in a house where the conditions are slightly
drier and cooler than the one in which they made their growth, as there is-
less danger of the flowers becoming spotted and ruined by excessive moisture.
Where the number of plants grown will not allow of a house being thus-
Set apart, the driest and coolest position should be selected for those in-

loom.

CATTLEYAs.—Amongst those which are in flower at the present time are
C. Mendelii, C. Mossiz, and their innumerable hybrids. C. Trianz and C.-
Schroederze, with their hybrids, are commencing to make new roots, and
Should the compost show signs of exhaustion fresh materials should be-
given. These plants are as easily grown as any others, provided a few
simple details are followed. The first is to keep them in a sweet and
healthy rooting medium; the second to repot them at those times when:
they are producing new roots, and the third to water very sparingly after’
repotting, as no plant will root freely into a saturated compost. If
thus treated they soon re-establish themselves in the new material, and-
receive the least check possible. Another reason why Cattleyas do not
thrive in many places is want of air. The atmosphere should be kept-
buoyant at all times, as a stuffy house is detrimental to them. Lastly, they
delight in abundance of light, but are not capable of withstanding strong.
sunshine.

Plants of C. Warscewiczii (gigas) that are now making strong growths,-
and showing their flower sheaths, should have abundance of light and heat,
and be supplied with water whenever they become dry. This plant, owing
to its short season of growth, should receive generous treatment after
growth commences, or it will not develop strong pseudobulbs, and it is folly,
to expect flowers from weak ones. Plants in bloom and those that have-
not made flower sheaths will greatly benefit by being placed under the:

182 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913.

conditions advised for flowering Orchids. When the flowers are faded the
plants should receive sufficient water to keep the pseudobulbs plump and
healthy. The drastic drying process, often called resting, is most
debilitating, and not conducive to flowering. C. Dowiana, and its variety
aurea, having now started into growth, may be placed in the warmest
position in the house, and must receive generous treatment if the growth is
to be satisfactory. These plants should be carefully watered until the
flowers open, and when these fade should be treated as advised for
C. Warscewiczii. C. Lueddemanniana (speciosissima) is another species
that delights in the temperature of the warm Cattleya house, and may be
‘treated in the same manner as those previously mentioned as _ regards
repotting. It can be taken as a general rule to repot any Cattleyas, Lzelias,
or Lzliocattleyas a few weeks after their flowering period, providing they
-are making, or about to make new roots. C. Warneri and its hybrids grow
under similar conditions to the preceding, and the earliest plants will be
producing flowers.

La ias.--By this time the roots of L. anceps, L. albida and other
-winter-flowering Orchids will have obtained a good hold in the new
-compost which was afforded early in the present year. As they delight in
abundance of light, air, and sun heat, the plants should be inured to it from
the commencement of their growth. These Lelias dislike artificial heat or a
.close atmosphere, but revel in a humid atmosphere with plenty of sun heat
and air, both day and night. Under these conditions they will make strong
‘hard pseudobulbs, with thick leathery leaves, and produce flower spikes
in abundance at a later period. Syringing or spraying with tepid soft
-water overhead, both morning and evening, whenever the weather is bright,
is highly beneficial, as the foliage and rooting material soon dries under
these conditions. The plants should not receive an excess of moisture at.the
roots, but sufficient to keep the compost moist and the bulbs and leaves
healthy. L. monophylla is a little gem that is now producing its flower
spikes in the Cool house, and should be kept well up to the light, but a
position where they will dry quickly must be avoided. It may receive
abundance of moisture at the roots, but must be carefully shaded from
sunshine. Should repotting be necessary it may be done after flowering.-

L#&LIOcATTLEYAS.—The remarks made respecting the two preceding
genera are also applicable to these, and need not be repeated. The
majority are of easy culture.

MILTonIas.—Few plants produce flowers in such abundance as
Miltonia vexillaria, and where grown in quantity their flowers may be
-enjoyed throughout the summer months. Plants that flowered early will
have passed out of bloom, and should be afforded a short rest. Nothing
-should now be done to induce growth, for the longer the period of rest this

June, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 183

species enjoys the stronger will the growth be when the season of activity
commences. For some weeks it will only be necessary to keep the compost
moist, but on no account must the plants be allowed to suffer for want of
moisture either at the roots or in the atmosphere. In damp and cold
localities the cool Intermediate house is the best place for this Orchid at
this season, but in more favoured districts the warm end of the Cool house
is more suitable. The hybrids, M. Bleuana and M. Hyeana, should always
be given a position in the Intermediate house. They make their growth in
the same way as M. vexillaria, and require similar treatment, with the
exception of temperature. They thrive in a slightly higher temperature
than M. vexillaria at all seasons.

CypRIPEDIUMS.—Such plants as C. bellatulum, b. album, niveum and
concolor, with their hybrids, C. Boltoni, Venus, Mrs. E. V. Low, Vipanii,
and others that have recently flowered, should be repotted if necessary. Well-
tooted specimens in good material, and with room to develop, should not be
disturbed. These plants are best grown in pots, which must be provided
with ample material for drainage purposes. They are often considered
difficult to cultivate, which is usually attributable to faulty treatment.
Failures are often caused by the excessive use of the water pot, especially
during the winter months. Many succeed in growing these plants in a
compost in which loam preponderates, but I find they thrive quite satis-
factorily in a compost made up of two parts peat fibre, one part loam
fibre, and sphagnum moss, with some small pieces of mortar rubble added.
The plants must be potted rather firmly, and should be elevated close to
the glass in a warm Intermediate house. The greatest secret as regards the
successful culture of this plant is to give water at the roots only when really
dry, and never to apply water overhead.

ODONTOGLOssUM cITROSMUM and O. URosKINNERI.—Plants of these
Species may be repotted as they pass out of bloom, should they require ‘it.
The pots must not be too large, and the drainage must be perfect, the pots
being quite half-filled with clean crocks. The usual Odontoglossum
compost is quite suitable, and the plants must be potted quite firmly. O.
¢itrosmum thrives suspended quite close to the roof of either the Cattleya
or Mexican house, whilst O. Uroskinneri will succeed best at the warm
end of the Cool house.

Ca:LoGcynrs.—Such plants as C. asperata, and others that flower at this
season, should be repotted, if necessary, when their growths are well
advanced, and about to push forth roots. Owing to the immense quantity
of water these plants take up when in full growth, the pots or pans used
must be well drained, and the compost must be placed around the plants
moderately firmly. They should be grown in a warm humid corner of the
East Indian house, and be well shaded from strong sunshine. The species

184 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913+

that produce pendulous flower spikes are best grown in shallow pans, which
may be suspended when in flower, where they will be seen to great
advantage. Some of the species are of a rambling character, and are
difficult to keep in a compact form, therefore it is advisable to sever the
rhizome behind the second or third bulb, and when the back bulbs have
produced a break they should be potted into small receptacles, when they
will soon make flowering plants. Propagation from back bulbs is most
interesting, and it is really astonishing how soon many of the small pieces,
even of valuable varieties, grow into useful flowering plants.

GENERAL REMARKS.—The cultivators aim during the present month
will be to push on with the different details of work, such as potting and
cleaning, and that general routine which comprises practically the everyday
life of the modern Orchid grower. To the enthusiastic grower, there is
always something new coming under his observation, so unlike some of the
callings of fellow workers, and whatever the drawbacks of our profession
may be, it certainly has much to interest us. Continual watchfulness 1s
necessary to combat the different foes which infest our plants, and the
usual remedies should be applied at the earliest possible moment and thus:
prevent a bad outbreak.

MESSRS. WM. BULL’S ORCHID EXHIBITION.

Tue annual Orchid Exhibition held at Chelsea by Messrs. Wm. Bull &
Sons always contains many features of interest, and upon our recent visit
the effective manner in which the Orchids were placed, here and there in @
setting of ferns, showed up the beauty of each plant to advantage, and
called forth much admiration. Undoubtedly the main attraction of the:
show was the magnificent new Odontoglossum crispum var. Princess
Mary, whose well-shaped flowers are blotched with vivid claret (See p- 176).
Other good forms were Premier, Diadem, and Marjorie.

Many good plants of Leliocattleya Aphrodite & Baden-Powellii were
observed, together with a good specimen of Dendrobium Wardianum
hololeucum. Three well-grown specimens of D. thyrsiflorum, carrying

eight, nine, and eight gracefully pendant flower spikes respectively were

much admired, whilst Odontioda Bradshawiz, Dora, and Vuylstekez wer
of good colouring. Several plants of the deep purple Odontoglossum
Fletcherianum (cirrhosum X Edwardii) were bearing long flower spikes,
whilst batches of the better-known Brassavola hybrids, such as. Brasso~
cattleya Maronii, Brassolelia Helen, and several others proved very
attractive.

Altogether the exhibition reflected great credit on Messrs. Bull, the
grouping of the other plants, such as Amaryllis and Carnations, with the
Orchids, producing a pleasing effect. C. ALwyNn HARRISON.

June, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 185

ODONTOGLOSSUM ELFRIDA.
THE annexed figure represents a striking and beautiful Odontoglossum
raised in the collection of Mrs. Norman Cookson, Oakwood, Wylam, from
O. Uroskinneri X armainvillierense (ardentissimum), and is reproduced
from a photograph kindly sent by Mr. H. J. Chapman. The flower, as
will be seen, is of excellent shape, the sepals.and petals being very broad
and round, and the lip strongly pandurate, with a well-expanded front lobe.
The markings are also very regular. Mr. Chapman remarks: “I think it
is a lovely thing, the ice-white ground forming a striking contrast to the
violet-purple markings. The characters of both parents can be very clearly
traced. The hybrids of O. Uroskinneri are not yet a very numerous class,

but the one with which it is most comparable is O. Goodsonii (O.R., xvii.

Fig. 35. ODONTOGLOSSUM ELFRIDA.

Pp. 280), of which O. Pescatorei Charlesworthii was the second parent, and
which has much more purple blotching in the flower. This received a
First-class Certificate fram the R.H.S. in August, 1909. The difference in
the present one arises from the addition of O. crispum in the ancestry.
The other Uroskinneri hybrids of which we have records are O. Eleanor
from O. cirrhosum: O. Groganiz, from O. Edwardii; O. Marie, from O.
Charlesworthii : O. Stamfordianum, from O. bictoniense album; Odontioda
Euterpe, from Cochlioda Neetzliana; O. Seymouriz, from C. vulcanica,
and O. Irene, from Odontioda Charlesworthii. Odontoglossum Groganiz

has a very interesting history, and some remarks on O. Uroskinueri as a

parent appeared at p. 133 of our last volume.

186 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913.

SOCIETIES.
GHENT QUINQUENNIAL.
(Concluded from page 165).

For the finest Selenipedium the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th.
‘Pauwels, Meirelbeke, with S. caudatum Sandere.

For the finest Sobralia the Silver-gilt Medal was won by MM. Jean Van
de Putte & Cie, with a fine S. macrantha.

For the finest Trichopilia the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Th.
Pauwels, with T. Hennisii.

For the most remarkable exotic Orchid, species or variety, of a genus
‘not in the preceding classes, the Silver-gilt Medal was won by M. Firmin
Lambeau, with Eulophiella Elisabethe.

For the best basket decorated with Orchid flowers, and for the best
Bouquet of Orchids, M. L. Van ili oii Ghent, gained two Silver-
gilt Medals.

Lastly, for the best hanging basket decorated with plants in flower, M.
A. Vanden Heede, Ghent, received the Silver-gilt Medal, the plants used
being several good Odontoglossum crispum,

Some handsome groups were staged in the non-competitive classes,
prizes being awarded as follows :—

The ‘‘ Val Duchesse” prize, offered by M. Ch. Dietrich, Vice-President
of the Cercle des Orchidophiles, Brussels, was awarded to M. Jules Hye de
Crom, Ghent, for a very fine group of Miltonias and other Orchids.

An CEuvre d’Art, value 500 francs, was awarded to M. Ch. Vuylsteke,
Loochristi, for a magnificent group of hybrid Odontoglossums and
‘Odontiodas.

An CEuvre d'Art, value 250 francs, was given to Messrs. Stuart Low &
Co., Enfield, for a very fine collection of Orchids.

A Gold Medal, value 1oo francs, was awarded to Messrs. Duchesne &
Lanthoine, Watermael, Brussels, for a collection of 50 well-grown Odonto-
-glossum crispum.

Gold Medals of similar value were also awarded to M. Maurice
Verdonck, Gentbrugge, for a collection of 75 Orchids; to Dr. Baillion,
Ghent, for 75 Orchids, and to M. Arthur Muesser, Woluwe St.-Lambert,
for a collection of Odontoglossum crispum.

Silver-gilt- Medals were awarded to M. Th. Pauwels, Meirelbeke, for
Eulophiella Hamelinii, and to M. Joseph de Hemptinne, St.-Denis-
‘Westrem, for Brassocattleya amabilis var. M.. Th. Pauwels.

From the preceding report it will be seen that the prize list was an
extensive one, though there were a good many blanks, including classes for
the most numerous species, for three new Orchids of different genera, for a

Jung, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 187

collection of hybrids, for Brazilian, Central American, and Congo Orchids,
for Ancectochili, for Masdevallias, several classes for Cypripediums, several
others for the Cattleya group, for bigeneric hybrids, for Miltonias, and for
twelve Odontiodas, the latter coming rather as a surprise in view of recent
developments.

The exhibition on this occasion was held on a new site, in the grounds
of the Great International Exhibition to be held from May to November.
The Orchids were staged in a set of twelve rooms, near the Central
Azalea Hall, six on the ground floor and six in an upper gallery, and the
arrangement, though showing individual groups to great advantage, did not
enable one to obtain such a good idea of the display as a whole. It also
sometimes confused plants that were competing in different classes, unless
the distinguishing labels were carefully examined, at the same time
separating groups entered in the same class, and in a few cases gave the
judges a good deal of running about. The idea evidently was to keep the
plants of individual exhibitors together, in whatever class they might be
entered. The quality generally was excellent, and many plants of great
interest were shown, some of which we shall attempt to notice in glancing
through the contributions of individual exhibitors, though anything like a
complete report is impossible.

The exhibit of M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels (gr. M. Demunter pere),
occupied a room to itself, and made a very fine display. The group which
gained the King’s prize was remarkable for richness and variety, and
occupied an area with about 50 feet frontage. The back was made up of
tall spikes of Cymbidium insigne and C. Pauwelsii, Oncidium Marshallianum,
Renanthera Imschootiana, Phalznopsis amabilis, and other tall things,
while in the centre were numerous handsome Brassocattleyas, including
B.-c. Princess Elisabeth (B.-c. Maronii x C. Mossi), some specially fine
B.-c. Vilmoriniana, B.-c. Leemannie and B.-c. langleyensis, a_ brilliant
Series of Cattleyas and Leliocattleyas, conspicuous among them being C.
O’Brieniana alba, C. Lueddemanniana Stanleyi, L.-c. Lucie and Golden
Glory. There were many fine Miltonia vexillaria, among which M. v.
memoria G. D. Owen with twelve flowers was conspicuous, also some
excellent M. Bleuana and M. Hyeana, while the numerous Odontoglossums
were well grown and beautiful. Odontiodas included the bronzy red O.
Charlesworthii Lambeau’s var., the superb O. Coronation with fifteen
flowers, some good O. Bradshawize and O. Chantecleer, the latter almost a
reversion to a very fine Cochlioda Neetzliana. We also noted Phalznopsis
Artemis, Masdevallia Veitchiana with fifteen flowers, and others too
numerous to mention. Among noteworthy plants which were successful
in other classes we may mention Odontoglossum_ Reine Elisabeth, a seed-
Jing of excellent shape, blotched with claret on a white ground, O. Ville de

188 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JUNE, 1913.

Gand, a. very heavily blotched and handsome hybrid. Cymbidium
Lambeauianum, a large creamy white flower tinted with rose and a dark
red band on the lip, and Eulophiella Elisabethe with six spikes.

M. Ch. Dietrich, Anderghem (gr. M. Demunter fil.), included in his
beautiful exhibit a fine series of Cattleya Schroederz varieties, among which
Chantecleer was a fine rose-pink form with bronzy orange throat, some
good C. Mendelii, C. Schilleriana, some beautiful examples of Miltonia
vexillaria and Bleuana, numerous Odontiodas and Odontoglossums, Den-
robium nobile, Saccolabium giganteum, some brilliant Brassocattleyas and
Leliocattleyas, with Oncidium concolor in front, and O. Marshallianum
and a fine lot of Cymbidium Pauwelsii and others behind. It was a rich
and beautifully arranged group.

M. Jules Hye de Crom, Ghent (gr. M. Coen), staged a remarkable
series of Miltonia vexillaria, including both white and rose-coloured forms,
with the handsome variety memoria G. D. Owen, and many beautiful
examples of M. Hyeana, showing a wide range of variation, the variety
Madame Hye de Crom bearing two spikes of four and five flowers, with
white ground, a rich ruby red mask with radiating lines at the front of the
lip, and a trace of rose-colour at the base of the petals. We also noted a
remarkably fine Cattleya Schroedere alba var. Louis de Hemptinne,
bearing seven flowers with exceptionally broad petals, C. Suzanne Hye de
Crom, another very beautiful albino, C. Lueddemanniana alba, Cymbidium
Pauwelsii, Odontioda Graireana, a well-flowered Masdevallia caudata,
Odontoglossum percultum, O. crispum Oakfield Sunrise, and numerous
other choice things.

M. Leon Hye de Crom, Ghent, exhibited a dozen fine blotched Odonto-
glossums, noteworthy among them being a superb O. amabile, O.
Ossulstonii, and O. Orion, a richly-coloured form.

Count Joseph de Hemptinne, St.-Denis-Westrem, exhibited a beautiful
group of well-grown plants, including fine forms of Cattleya Schroeder,
C. S. alba, Miltonia Bleuana nobilior and some good M. vexillaria, a
selection of Odontiodas and Odontoglossums, with Odontoglossum
Edwardii, Dendrobium pulchellum, Phalznopsis amabilis Rimestadiana,
Cymbidium Pauwelsii and insigne, Oncidium Marshallianum and other
good things. His fifty Odontoglossums were also very well grown, and the
Cymbidium Lowianum an enormous specimen crowded with spikes.

M. L. Hoornaert, St. Nicholas, staged some good plants in his second
prize group of Phalenopsis, mostly P. Schilleriana and P. amabilis
Rimestadiana, the latter being also second for a single specimen.

M. M. Henri Vacherot et Lecoufle, Boissy-St.-Leger, France, staged
some good examples of L.-c. Lucie, bright yellow with crimson on the lip,
and others, in the class for twenty Lezeliocattleyas.

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 189

Dr. Baillion, Ghent, staged a beautiful group of seventy-five Orchids in
a non-competitive group, including a fine Phalznopsis Schilleriana,
Cymbidium Pauwelsii, the albino Cypripedium memoria Alma Gevaert, a
beautiful Brassocattleya Marie, and some good Odontiodas, Odonto-
glossums, and Oncidiums.

M. Ch. Maillard, St. Andre lez Lille, staged some beautiful things in
the class for the best collection of Odontoglossums, including O. eximium,
loochristiense, concinnum, Charlesworthii, Doris, and others, with a
beautiful example of Odontioda Ajax.

M. Arthur Meusser, Woluwe-St.-Lambert, also staged some good things
in a non-competitive group of Odontoglossums.

M. Th. Pauwels, Meirelbeke, made a remarkably fine display in the
Nurserymen’s class for the best and most varied group of Orchids. The
back was made up of numerous plants of Cymbidium Pauwelsii, C.
Alexanderi, C. Humblotii, C. Lowianum concolor, some fine forms of
Odontoglossum Thompsonianum and other O. Edwardii hybrids, with
Oncidium Marshallianum and O. superbiens, and fine examples of
Dendrobium Phalenopsis, pulchellum and Jamesianum, while in front
was a brilliant series of Odontiodas and Odontoglossums, Chysis
bractescens, Cattleyas, Lzliocattleyas, and Brassocattleyas, a very fine
Maxillaria Sanderiana, some excellent Miltonias and Odontocidium
Edwardatum (O. Edwardii x O. serratum), while a plant of Odontioda
floribunda, with a great panicle of twenty-two branches crowded with
flowers was also remarkable. The group had a margin of Oncidium
concolor in front. His winning group of Phalenopsis Schilleriana and
amabilis, and of thirty exotic Orchids, were also excellent in quality, while
the Trichopilia Hennisii, Lycaste Skinneri alba La Perle, Cypripedium
Alcibiades Roi Albert, Selenipedium Schroeder, S. caudatum Sandere,
Masdevallia Pourbaixii, Epidendrum radicans, Phaius Norman, Cymbidium
Pauwelsii var. Andre, and Aérides Houlletianum, which received the prizes:
in their respective classes, were also noteworthy. Eulophiella Hamelinii
with two spikes, was awarded a special prize.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a very rich and
varied group, in which the Odontoglossums were specially remarkable,
including a brilliant series of O. eximium, blotched seedling forms of O.
crispum, QO. illustrissimum Black Prince, O. Wilckeanum Imperator,
Thompsonianum, Aireworth, Dora, and others, while Odontiodas contained
the bronzy red O. Joan, superb forms of O. Bradshawiz, Charlesworthii,
Lutetia, Diana, Latona, Wilsonii, and Edna, Leliocattleyas included
the apricot yellow L.-c. Feronia, and some purple forms, while the yellow
Brassocattleya Joan var. Rayon d’Or, and forms of B.-c. Veitchii and
others were very attractive. The group also contained the striking purple

1g0 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1973.

Oncidium Claesii, some fine O. Marshallianum, Eulophiella Elisabethe,
Cymbidium Humblotii, with four racemes, Phaius simulans, CHonia
polystachya, Zygopetalum Perrenoudii, Vanda Denisoniana, Leptotes
bicolor, Maxillaria Sanderiana, Odontocidium Fowlerianum, Ccelogyne
pandurata, some excellent Miltonia Bleuana and vexillaria, the latter
including var. Lyoth, a beautiful rose-coloured seedling with a crimson
mask on the base of the lip, and others too numerous to mention, forming
one of the richest and most beautiful groups in the show.

M. Ch. Vuylsteke, Loochristi, staged a remarkable group of Odonto-
glossums and Odontiodas in a glass case of seven métres frontage, and
containing over sixty plants. Noteworthy among the Odontoglossums
were O. Aiglon var. giganteum, an immense flower, heavily blotched with
purple on a white ground, some brilliant forms of eximium, percultum,
and amabile, Pomona, suffused with slaty blue and a white margin,
Saturnus, deep blue purple, Diamant, a fine white, Armide, maroon-purple,
Queen Elisabeth, white with purple blotches, La Candeur, white with an
occasional purple blotch, Lawrenceanum, and O. excellens Themis, a large
yellow form. The Odontiodas were brilliant in the extreme, and included
Etna, intense scarlet, Gloria Mundi, a large and richly-coloured form,
Brilliant, deep rose-colour, Vulcan, intense crimson, Blushing Bride, a
lovely blush pink form without a trace of scarlet, Pierrot, white, with light
flesh brown blotches, Vuylstekez Enchantress, a large and very beautiful
form, formosa, a deep scarlet with traces of yellow lines, almost a reversion
to a large Cochlioda Neetzliana in shape, and many others.

M. Maurice Verdonck, Gentbrugge, carried off most of the prizes in the
geographical groups, and his group of Orchids from Peru and Colombia
contained good examples of Masdevallia coccinea, amabilis, Chimera, and
ephippium, Odontoglossum cirrhosum and_ polyxanthum, Cochlioda
Neetzliana and vulcanica, Miltonia Warscewiczii, and others, while among
the Indian group were good examples of Phalznopsis Schilleriana and
amabilis, Dendrobium Phalznopsis, and others, Cymbidium insigne and
Schreederi, Cypripedium tonsum, Chamberlainianum, Rothschildianum,
barbatum, &c. The groups for twenty-five and twelve Dendrobiums
contained well-flowered examples of D. nobile, Wardianum, densiflorum,
chrysotoxum, infundibulum, crassinode, and others, while his fifty Odonto-
glossum crispum was a well-grown lot of the typical unspotted form, and
made a fine show. The group of fifty Orchids for florists’ work included
good representatives of many popular varieties.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, staged a fine group of showy
Orchids, including some good Dendrobium Wardianum, Miltonia vexillaria,
Cattleya Schroeder and Trianz, Lzliocattleya Dominiana, Brassocattleya
langleyensis, Maroniz, and’ Fowleri,; fine specimens of Odontoglossum

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 19F

spectabile, and others, Cymbidium Lowgrinum with two racemes, the rare
Pleurothallis Birchenallii, Polystachya paniculata, Odontioda Charles-
worthii, a fine Oncidium lamelligerum, and a lot of good O. concolor in front.

M. Emile Praet, Mont-St.-Amand, staged a number of good things in
the premier group of fifty Orchids (Nurserymen), the centre of which was
made up of a pyramid of Dendrobium. Phalenopsis, Renanthera
Imschootiana, and Phalenopsis amabilis, while in front were some good
Leliocattleya Hyeana, Brassocatleyas, Miltonia vexillaria, including var.
leucoglossa with four spikes, Odontoglossums, a fine Odontioda Vuylstekez,.
and others. He also gained the second prize for thirty Orchids and for
Indian Orchids with good collections.

M. M. Van de Putte & Cie., Ledeberg, staged some good plants of
Oncidium Cavendishianum, sarcodes, and others, in a group of Oncidiums,.
and it was a fine plant of the former that secured the prize for the best
Oncidium. They were also first for a Sobralia, with S. macrantha, second
for Lycastes, with L. Skinneri, and second for fifty Orchids (Nurserymen)
with a well-arranged collection.

M. M. A. & G. Janssens, Merxem, staged some good things in their
second prize group for fifty Orchids, among which Odontoglossum crispum
roseum, Cymbidium Pauwelsii, with Cattleya Lawrenceana, Mendelii and.
Schroederze were conspicuous. In the same class M. Rene Beheils-Van-
Poucke, St. Nicholas, was third, his group also containing some interesting’
things.

Messrs. Duchesne & Lanthoine, Watermael, staged a beautiful group of
fifty plants of the typical Odontoglossum crispum, as a non-competitive
group, to which a Gold Medal was awarded.

Orchids were also used with great effect in many groups of floral.
decoration, for which they are eminently suited by reason of their graceful
scapes and charming colours.

RoyaL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on April 29th, when there was a rather small display of
Orchids, and the awards consisted of four medals, one Award of Merit, and
one Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present : J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), andi
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), R. Brooman White, J. Wilson Potter, W.
Cobb, R. G. Thwaites, T. Armstrong, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, J. E.
Shill, A. Dye, W. H. White, W. Bolton, C. J. Lucas, Gurney Wilson, and.
Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr-
Alexander), sent a very fine specimen of Cattleya Enid Westonbirt var-

a92 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (June, 1913.

bearing a spike of six magnificent flowers, also C. Prince Olaf Westonbirt
-var., and the blush-white C. Schroederze Luna.

G. W. Bird, Esq., Manor House, West Wickham (gr. Mr. Ridden),
showed Odontioda Kitty (O. wickhamiensis x Odontoglossum armain-
-villierense), with rich claret-red flowers.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent Cattleya
Mendelii Blanche, blush-white with a white lip, Odontoglossum illustre
Radium, and O. hellemense var. Watsonianum (harvengtense x crispum),
a richly-blotched form.

Lord Grantly, Oakley Hall, Colchester (gr. Mr. Mabbett), sent a plant
reputed to be a cross between Chysis bractescens and ‘‘ Phaius Swin-
-burnei,” which, however, appeared to be identical with the Chysis.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent
‘two good specimens of Brassocatlelia Triune.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent finely-
coloured varieties of Odontoglossum Aireworth and O. Doris, also
‘Odontioda Vuylstekei Ashtead Park var. (C. Neetzliana x O. Pescatorei
Veitchianum), with flowers of uniform deep rosy scarlet.

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a fine group, to
‘which a Silver Flora Medal was awarded. It contained some good forms
of Miltonia Bleuana, M. vexillaria, and Odontoglossum crispum, with
Coelogyne nitida, the striking Chondrorhyncha Chestertoni, Brasso-
catlelia Leeana, an Eria with orange-red flowers, some yellow
Dendrobiums and Oncidiums, Masdevallia caudata, M. Houtteana, M.-
bockingensis, and others.

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, received a Silver Banksian Medal for
a group of Odontoglossums, Miltonia vexillaria, and Lzliocattleya Ballii.

Mr. A. W. Jensen, Lindfield, Sussex, received a Silver Banksian Medal
for a good group, including some excellent Odontoglossum crispum,
Oncidium Marshallianum and Cattleya Mendelii.

Mr. C. F. Waters, Balcombe, also received a Silver Banksian Medal for
a good. group of Cattleya Mendelii and Schrcedere, Miltonia vexillaria,
‘Odontoglossums, Lycaste Skinneri, and other showy Orchids.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, sent the beautiful Lzliocattleya
Boylei var. Kerchovez, and Cattleya Mendelii Dreadnought, a large rosy
lilac form with the front of the lip violet-purple.

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, sent Brassocatlelia Geraid
{B.-l. Veitchii X Lzliocattleya bletchleyensis), a large and showy hybrid
‘with soft rose-pink sepals and petals and a rather darker lip.

AWARD OF MERIT.

ODONTOGLOSSUM AMABILE ZEUS.—A very large and handsome form,

shaving broad white sepals and petals, blotched and spotted with reddish

See nae
aia

JUNE, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 193

purple on the lower halves, and the lip with a dark purple blotch in front of
the yellow crest. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford, K.C.V.O.
CULTURAL COMMENDATION
EPIDENDRUM LEUCOCHILUM.—To Mr. W. H. White, gr. to Sir Trevor
Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., for a very fine specimen, bearing six spikes of
from eight to fifteen flowers, with greenish sepals and petals and a white lip.

At the meeting held on Wednesday, May 14th, there was a very small
display of Orchids, doubtless on account of the Spring Show to be held at
Chelsea a week later, but the quality was good, and the awards consisted
of four Cultural Commendations, three Awards of ‘Merit, one Botanical
Certificate and one medal.

‘Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
and Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, A. McBean,
R. A. Rolfe, Walter Cobb, J. Cypher, H.-G. Alexander, A. Dye,
W. H. White, S. W. Flory, and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

Sir George H..Kendrick, Whetstone, Edgbaston, Birmingham (gr. Mr.
Macdonald), was awarded a Silver Flora Medal for a group of a dozen fine
plants of Dendrobium pulchellum (Dalhousieanum) all derived from one
original one. The plants were four to five feet high, and bore three and
four spikes each.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), showed
a small group of choice and well grown Orchids, including the remarkable
Dendrobium thyrsiflorum Galliceanum, in which the lip is shell-shaped
and paler in colour than the type, a fine clump of Cochlioda sanguinea with
numerous spikes, Leeliocattleya Fascinator, and fine examples of Odonto-
glossum crispum Oakfield Sunrise, with a spike of thirteen flowers, O. c.
Rossendale, and O. c. purpurascens. -

W. R. Lee, Esq., Plumpton Hall, Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), sent
Odontoglossum Pavlova, of unrecorded parentage, and bearing a spike of
eleven claret-coloured flowers.

C. Alwyn Harrison, Esq., Lyndhurst, Watford, sent Lzliocattleya Elsie
Lemare, with blush-pink sepals and petals, and a rose-purple lip with deep
yellow throat, and Odontoglossum Ianthe Harrison’s var. (armainvillierense
X Hallii-crispum), a white flower well blotched with cinnamon-brown.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Odont-
ioda Sandere (C. Neetzliana x O. ciigeaeuiss bearing seven very brilliant
rosy scarlet flowers.

Mr. R. A. Rolfe showed flowers of two interesting hybrids, grown at
Kew, the crosses having been made by him to prove the parentage of natural
hybrids. These were Odontoglossum Lindleyanum x crispum, yielding a
yellow flower blotched with brown, referable to O. Coradinei with rather

194 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913-

narrow segments, and Lelia Boothiana xX Cattleya intermedia, giving a
blush-pink flower, with the front of the three-lobed lip purple, not quite
identical with Leliocattleya amanda, though thought to be a form of the
same hybrid. The flower shown was from a spike of five.

The Liverpool Horticultural Company, Gateacre, Liverpool, staged an
interesting group, including forms of the variable Lzliocattleya Cowanii,
L.-c. highburiensis, L.-c. Schilleriana x Mossiz, hybrids of Lelia cinna-
brosa and others, also Cypripedium bellatulum Queen of Spain, with light
rose-pink blotches.

Messrs. J. and A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent Odontioda Lambeauiana,
a richly-coloured form, with traces of a white ground showing in the lip.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

BRASSOCATLELIA VEITCHII THE DELL var. (L. purpurata xX B.-c.
Veitchii)—A remarkably large and richly-coloured form, having the sepals
and petals tinged with rose, and the lip deep rose-purple shading off to rosy
lilac at the fringed margin. Exhibited by Baron Bruno Schréder, The
Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill).

L#LiocaTTLEYA Fascinator-Mossi# BuRFORD VAR.—A large and well
shaped hybrid, having blush-white sepals and petals with a small purple
apex to the latter, and the front of the lip violet-purple with a pale margin.
Exhibited by Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart.

ODONTOGLOSSUM PHG:BE SPLENDENS (cirrhosum X crispum).—A large
and striking form, having broad acuminate white sepals and petals, with a
few very large maroon blotches. Exhibited by Messrs. J. and A. McBean.

BOTANICAL CERTIFICATE.

LISSOCHILUS STREPTOPETALUS.—A very fine specimen, bearing eight
spikes of flowers, with bright yellow petals, and the smaller sepals green
striped with brown. The plant was collected in the N’gongo Hills, at
8300 feet elevation, about 30 miles from Nairobi. Exhibited by William
Van de Weyer, Esq., Smedmore House, Corfe Castle.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

BRASSOCATTLEYA NIVALIS.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to
Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., for a fine specimen bearing nine racemes of
nearly white flowers, and producing a very graceful effect.

DENDROBIUM FaLconEeRI.—To Mr. Branch, gardener to W. R.
Lee, Esq., Heywood, for a finely grown specimen some 24 feet high and
bearing about 200 flowers.

DENDROBIUM PULCHELLUM (Dalhousieanum).—To Mr. C. J. Salter»
gardener to the Right Hon. Lord Lawrence, Chetwoode Manor, Bucking-
ham, for a noble specimen, over six feet high, and bearing thirteen racemes
of flowers. A similar award was given to Mr. Macdonald, gardener to
_ Sir G. H. Kenrick, for a group of twelve plants of the same species.

JUNE, 1913.] - THE ORCHID REVIEW. 195

New York NATIONAL SHow.
AN account of the Third National Flower Show, held at New York early in
April, is reported in Horticulture for April 12th and 19th. It is remarked that
a much sought-for exhibit was the sensational Odontioda Bradshawize-
(C. Neetzliana x O. crispum Mary Colman) sent over by Sir Jeremiah
Colman from England. The flowers are rich vermilion, and the plant bore’
two fine spikes. The awards in the Orchid section are reported as follows :

Orchids in flower, 100 sq. ft.—Gold Medal and rst, Julius Roehrs Co. ;
2nd, James Goodier, Trenton, N. 4; 3

Orchids, twelve plants.—Silver Medal and rst, Anton Schultheis; 2nd,
W. A. Manda.

Orchids, six plants.—Clement C. Moore, Hackensack, New Jersey (gr-
John Mossman).

Brassocattleya.—1st, Clement Moore; 2nd, Lager & Hurrell, N. J.

Orchid, Specimen.—Silver Cup, Ist, Sir Jeremiah Colman, Gatton Park,
England; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Cattleya Mossize.—tst, Lager & Hurrell; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Cattleya Schroedere.—First, Mrs. F. B. Van Vorst (gr. A. Anderson) ;
and, W. A. Manda.

Cypripediums.—tst, Lager & Hurrell; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Dendrobium, twenty plants.—Gold Medal, W. A. Manda.

Dendrobium nobile.—1st, Sidney M. and Austin Colgate, Orange, N. J-
(gr. Wm. Reid); and, W. A. Manda; 3rd, Lager & Hurrell.

Dendrobium Wardianum.—W. A. Manda.

Dendrobium, Specimen.—1st, Julius Roehrs Co. ; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Hybrid Orchid, raised in America.—Gold Medal, 1st, James Goodier ;
Silver Medal and 2nd, W. A. Manda.

_ Leeliocattleya.—rst, Lager & Hurrell; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Any other Bigeneric Hybrid.—1st, W. A. Manda; 2nd, Lager & Hurrell.

Odontoglossum.—1st, Julius Roehrs Co.; 2nd, Sir Jeremiah Colman.

Oncidium, specimen Lzelia, and Cypripedium hybrid.—W. A. Manda.

Vanda.—rst, Lager & Hurrell; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Specimen, any other Orchid.—1st, Lager & Hurrell; 2nd, C. C. Moore.

Group of Hybrid Orchids.—Gold Medal to Clement C. Moore.

Orchid species.—1st, Clement C. Moore; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Orchid hybrid.—1st, Clement C. Moore; 2nd, W. A. Manda.

Corsage of Orchids.—1st, Max Schiling ; 2nd, Boston Cut Flower Co.,
Boston.

A late arrival at the show is said to have been a case of Orchids from
W. A. Manda’s English branch, which came in remarkable condition after
Mt te the water-nine days. Hybrid Odontoglossums, plants and cut —
blooms, and Cypripediums were the principal item (Gold Medal).

4196 . THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JUNE, 1913.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.
AT the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on April 17th, the
‘members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the
‘Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, J. Bamber, A. Hanmer, W. Hatcher, A. J.
Keeling, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, W. Morgan, C. Parker, F. K. Sander, H.
Thorp, A. Warburton, E. H. Davidson, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Gold Medal was awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr.
Weatherby), for a magnificent group, composed chiefly of Odontoglossums
of the crispum section, with some very fine hybrids and other good things.

Silver-gilt Medals were awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden), whose group included the original Odontoglossum Pescatorei
xanthotes, imported several years ago, and A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
{gr. Mr. Dalgleish), for very fine mixed groups.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Black-
burn (gr. Mr. Lupton), and W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch),
for choice groups.

A Silver Medal was awarded to J. Lawson, Esq., Sharples, Bolton (gr.
Mr. Pountain), for a group of very fine, well-flowered plants of Dendrobium
Wardianum and Odontoglossums in variety.

Bronze Medals were awarded to Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), for a small group of Cypripediums, and to Messrs
A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, for a good miscellaneous group.

Interesting exhibits were staged by W. Thompson, Esq., Walton
Grange (gr. Mr. Howes); H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn; Mr. E.
Davidson, Twyford; and Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells.

FIRSsT-CLAss CERTIFICATES.

Odontoglossum Mrs. Thompson (parentage unknown), a large flower,
with wavy segments of almost solid colour; and Odontioda Wm. Thompson,
of good’colour, 23 inches across, both from Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Brassocatlelia King Emperor (L.-c. callistoglossa x B.-c. Veitchii), a
magnificent flower, over eight inches across, with broad petals and lip, the
latter with a yellow throat and deep maroon band, from W. R. Lee, Esq-

Odontoglossum crispum militare, a good round flower, very bright, and
of almost solid colour, from A. Warburton, Esq.

Odontoglossum crispum Orchid Dene var., a large flower, with fringed,
heavily blotched sepals and petals, from Mr. E. H. Davidson.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Odontioda Bradshawie Hestia, and O. Evadne, from W. R. Lee, Esq-

Odontonia Edna (O. Wilckeanum x Miltonia Warscewiczii), and
Leliocattleya Mrs. Temple Ashlands var., both from R. Ashworth, Esq.

Odontoglossum crispum var. J. Howes, from Wm. Thompson, Esq-

Odontoglossum Dreadnought, from Z. A. Ward, Esq.

June, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 197

Odontoglossum Aurora (Rossii rubescens X Lambeauianum), and O..
crispum rotundum, both from Mr. E. H. Davidson.

Dendrobium Harveyanum, from Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

AWARD OF APPRECIATION.

Odontoglossum cordatum aureum, from R. Ashworth, Esq.

BoTANICAL CERTIFICATE, 2ND CLASS.

Epidendrum Lambda, from Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

At the meeting held on May 1st the members of Committee present
were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, J.-
Bamber, J. Cypher, J. Evans, Dr. Hartley, A. J. Keeling, J. Lupton,
D. McLeod, W. Morgan, C. Parker, A. Warburton, E. H. Davidson, and’
H. Arthur (Secretary).

Silver Medals were awarded to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr.
Mr. Lupton); Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham,; Messrs. A. J. Keeling
& Sons, Bradford ; and Mr. D. McLeod, Chorlton-cum-Hardy, for good
miscellaneous groups.

Interesting exhibits were staged by Mrs. Gratrix, Whalley Range (gr.
Mr. Brown); J. Leemann, Esq., Heaton Mersey (gr. Mr. Smith); O. O.
Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers); and Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge.

A Bronze Medal and Cultural Certificate were awarded to O. O,
Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), for three plants of
Anguloa Clowesii, one carrying seven flowers. |

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Brassocatlelia Triune var. Gratrixie (L.-c. Hyeana X B.-c. Schroedere-
Digbyana), a magnificent flower, with a wide, drooping, well-coloured lip;.
from Mrs. Gratrix.

Odontoglossum Jasper Orchid Dene var. (amabile X crispum), a
large, well-spotted flower on a rosy ground, and O. Aireworth Borlases
var. (crispum XX Lambeauianum), a very fine form, of almost solid
colour, from Mr. E. H. Davidson.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cattleya Enid var. illustris and C. Mendelii var. Regina, both from J.
Leemann, Esq.

Leliocattleya Duchess of Connaught (L. harpophylla x C. Schroeder):
from Mrs. Gratrix.

Cattleya Schilleriana splendens, from P. Weathers, Esq., Old Trafford.

The Annual General meeting was held at 2.30 p.m. R. Ashworth,.
Esq., was appointed President and Hon. Treasurer of the Society, with the
Rey. J. Crombleholme, Chairman, Z. A. Ward, Esq., Vice-Chairman, bis.
Thorp, Esq., Hon. Auditor, and H. Arthur, Secretary.

198 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913.

A Committee was appointed, and the prizes were presented to the
-successful exhibitors as follows :—

S. Gratrix’s Cup, to Z. A. Ward, Esq., gr: Mr. Weatherby.

E. H. Davidson’s Cup, to Z. A. Ward, Esq., gr. Mr. Weatherby.

Cypher’s Gold Medal, to Z. A. Ward, Esq., gr. Mr. Weatherby.

Z. A. Ward’s Gold Medal to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., gr. Mr. Lupton.

O. O. Wrigley’s Gold Medal to A. Warburton, Esq., gr. Mr. Dalgleish.

Sander Prizes, Mr. Lupton (gr. to Col. J. Rutherford, M.P.), Mr.

Marshall (gr. to Rev. J. Crombleholme), equal Firsts, and Mr. Weatherby
(gr. to Z. A. Ward, Esq.), Third.

The Society’s Gold Medal (for Amateurs without gardener), to H.
Arthur, Esq., and Silver-gilt Medal to F. A. Hindley, Esq.

A Gold Medal and Prize to Gardener (given by a member of the Society),
“was presented to R. Ashworth, Esq., (gr. Mr. Gilden,) for meritorious
exhibits during the session.

Several prizes were offered for competition during the coming session,
-due notice of which will be given.

EE aah ail ta nth at
ORCHIDS IN SEASON.
A SPIKE of a fine deep red form of Odontioda Bradshawize bearing twenty-
-one flowers, is sent from the collection of Mrs. Fielden, Grimston Park,
Tadcaster, by Mr. G. P. Bound.

Several interesting seedling Odontoglossums have been sent from the
collection of H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill, by Mr. F. W.
Thurgood. O. crispum Mrs. Pitt is a good round flower, irregularly
blotched with claret colour on a white ground, and O. c. ‘Flambeau has a
purple suffusion on the petals and cinnamon-brown on the petals, leaving
the apex and margins white. A third shows some influence of O. Harryanum
in the markings on the lip, and a fourth is yellow with a few brown spots,
and shows an approach to O. Wilckeanum in shape. A fifth recalls a
heavily blotched O. excellens, or some other O. triumphans hybrid. Lastly
three are seedlings of O. Edwardii. All were raised in the collection, and
_are very promising.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.

Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during June, on the 3rd
and 17th, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour, 12
-o’clock noon.

The following meeting is the great Summer Show, to be held at Holland
House, Kensington, on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, July 1st, 2nd,
and 3rd. Cups and Medals will be awarded according to merit. The sixty-

SSM =

I ee

June, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 199

guinea Coronation Challenge Cup will be awarded by the Council, in open
competition, to what, in their opinion, is the most meritorious group in the
Show (excluding the winner of the two previous years). The Judging will
commence at 10 a.m., and the Orchid Committee will meet half an hour
later.

The next meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid
Society will be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on June 5th. The
Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection from 1
to4p.m. The following meeting is fixed for July 3rd.

The following competitions are announced for the coming year :—

Silver Cup, and Prize to Gardener, for general excellence, presented by
R. Ashworth, Esq.

Medals, and Prize to Gardener, for Cypripediums, presented by J. J.
Bolton, Esq.

Silver Cup, and Prize to Gardener, for Odontoglossums, presented by
Mr. E. H. Davidson.

Medal, and Prize to Gardener, for Cattleyas, presented by Mr. J. Evans.

Objet d’Art, and Prize to Gardener, presented by Messrs. Charlesworth

Co.

Prizes for Groups, presented by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

Medal, for Arrangement, presented by Messrs. Cypher & Sons.

Medal, presented by the Botanic Society of Manchester.

SUMMER EXHIBITION AT GHENT.—A second Horticultural Exhibition
at Ghent is being organised by the Cercle Horticole van Houtte, to be held
in the Palace of Horticulture, from August 9th to 18th. Orchids will form
one of the leading features of the Show, and num2rous prizes are offered.
Schedules can be obtained from the Secretary, M. Francois Spae, Ghent.
Entries must be sent by July 25th at the latest.

We learn from Horticulture that a 4000 dols. collection of Orchids, native
to many foreign countries, has been offered to the city of Omaha, Neb.,
free by Mrs. George A. Joslyn, in addition to tooo dols. in money with
which to care for them. The Joslyn residence was badly damaged in the
tornado, and probably half of the plants in their private greenhouse were
destroyed. Park Commissioner Hummel has asked the city commission
for 3000 dols. with which to build a greenhouse in Hanscom Park, where
the plants could be kept.

We learn that the collection of Orchids formed by Sir William Bass, at
Byrkley Lodge, near Burton-on-Trent, is to be dispersed under the hammer
by Messrs. Knight, Frank & Rutley, early in July.

‘200 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JUNE, 1913-

Honour FoR Mr. R. A. Ro_FE.—We are pleased to learn that the
French Académie Internationale de Géographie Botanique has awarded to
Mr. R. A. Rolfe its Scientific Medal in recognition of his work among Orchids.

In addition to his valuable work in the Kew Herbarium, Mr. Rolfe has -

edited the Orchid Review since its commencement in 1893. The honour is
conferred upon Mr. Rolfe at a fitting time, as it marks the coming-of-age of
the Orchid Review.—The Garden.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

CATTLEYA TITYUS SHRUBBERY VAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 333, with fig.

CaTTLEYA ZEPHYRA.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 741, with fig.

CYMBIDIUM SCHLEGELII.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 234, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM AUREUM HyEANUM.—/Journ. Hort., 1913, i. p. 421, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM ROUNDHEAD.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 338, with fig.

LA&LIOCATTLEYA BRITANNIA WESTONBIRT VAR., Gard. Mag., 1913, P-
377, with fig.

L#LIOCATTLEYA NELLA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 335, with fig.

OpONTIODA BRADSHAWI&.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 337, with fig.

ODONTOGLOSSUM AMABILE VAR. ZEUS.—Gard. Mag., 1913; p. 311, with fig-

ODONTOGLOssUM Empress OF InDIA.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 379, with fig-

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM ARMSTRONGI&.—Gard. Chron., 1913, 1. P-
350, fig. 150.

ODONTOGLOSsUM PESCATOREI Lapy HoLrorp.—Gard. Chron., 1913, i-
p- 283, fig. 120.

ODONTOGLOSSUM PRINCEss MARY.—Gard. May., 1913, p. 345, with fig.

OponToGLossuM THaIs.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 336, with fig.

OponTonia L2&LIA SANDER.—Gard. Chron., 1913, i. p. 349, fig. 149.

PHAL#NOPSIS SCHILLERIANA (specimen).—Horticulture, 1913, p. 426,
with fig.

— > 0«
ANSWERS TO ee ee

[Orchids <i xe and questions peated as far fh oes sible cbt neg are
8 rr apa re apy shige: or parentage ve ioe sent, ree DRESSED postcard must be
od reply airy esire abroad rly tcard ‘ns ld b i é
will be dealt with in the body of the ve] : pe A ea a as ea

R.C.K.—Ca — boundise edia, a South Brazilian species, readily distinguished from
C. Harrisoniana by its narrower white sepals and petals, and the bright purple lip.

De, 1. G. Ey ass aromatica, Lindl.

E. ontoglossum Charlesworthii, a hybrid between O. triumphans and O:
Harryanum. Probably it got among t eO.c crispum by accident, as you suggest
‘ Hoes BOK received with thanks. —H.G.A.; W.B. & Sons ; Sander & Sons ; C. & Co.;

t.

W. T.—Please forward record Me parentage, as otherwise it is difficult to fit these

complex hybrids into ae correct plac
Owing to the pressure on our space iis month, some important Continental and other
notes are unavoidably postponed, also the Orchid awards at the R.H.S. Chelsea Show.

Atak CORCOELLD. REVIEW

-- VoL. XXI.] JUBY : 86x32. [No. 247.

A BRITISH NATURAL HYBRID ORCHIS.
ORCHIS BRAUNII.

Orcuis latifolia and O. maculata are now flowering profusely, and the
question has again cropped up as to whether they are really distinct or only.
forms of one variable species. Mr. F. Escombe has sent to Kew a fine
series of both, together with some perplexing intermediate forms, which
were gathered in a marshy meadow at Shawford, near Winchester, and
remarks that there seems to be a continuous gradation in size, colour, and
markings between the two. He asks whether it is a case of fluctuating
variability in a comprehensive species or hybridisation between two separate
species? We believe it to be the latter. It was a similar intermediate
form from the same district that was recorded in 1883 by Townsend, in his
Flora of Hampshire (p. 341), under the name of O. latifolio-maculata, and
this hybrid has since been recorded from several other British localities
where the parent species grow intermixed, as Headington Wick Bog,
Oxfordshire, in 1886 (Druce, Fl. Oxford, p. 294), Egg Buckland, Devonshire,
in 1889 (Rolfe in Gard. Chron., 1889, ii. p- 10), and Trewedna Valley,
Cornwall, in 1909 (Davey, Fi. Cornw., p. 425). Recently it has been sent
from Gibbons Brook, East Kent, by Mr. John Cryer, of Shipley, Yorks,
and we believe that other localities have been recorded. On the Continent
it is known under the name of O. Braunii, having been described by
Halacsy in 1881 (CErst. Bot. Zeitschr., Xxxxi. p- 137) from specimens
collected between Hainbach and Steinbach, Lower Austria, and since
then it has been found in Germany, Switzerland, and France.

The parent species, in their typical forms, are quite distinct, and largely
occupy different stations. . latifolia usually occurs in bogs or wet marshy
meadows, and has stout, fistular stems, rather broad, suberect green leaves,
and large purple flowers with some purple spots on the lip, while O.
maculata prefers drier heaths, meadows, and similar stations, and has more
Slender solid stems, narrower spotted leaves, the basal ones more spreading,
and much smaller white or pinkish flowers, lined with purple on the more
Strongly three-lobed lip. The hybrid, as generally understood, may be
described as intermediate, but has somewhat slender solid stems, spotted

202 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JULY, 1913.

leaves, and purple flowers with darker line on the lip. It. is thus most
like O. maculata in vegetative characters and O. latifolia in the flowers, but
there are some perplexing variations, probably reversions, for the limits of
hybridity are not known. The Devonshire hybrid is interesting in this
connection, for in 1880 T. R. Archer Briggs recorded finding O. latifolia
with spotted leaves at Egg Buckland, but remarked that the form with
spotless leaves was far more common (Fl. Devon., p. 324), and nine years
later he sent examples to Kew from this locality as probably hybrids, found
together with the two parents in rough pasture land.

On the Continent plants with spotted leaves have been figured as forms
of O. latifolia, and the question arises whether the spots may not be due to
hybridity. Townsend also mentions this spotted-leaved form, and remarks
that the lip has nearly equal lobes, with spots forming continuous lines.
The allied O. foliosa supplies a possibly parallel case. It is a native of
Madeira, and has plain green leaves, but the late Mr. C. Wolley Dod, in a
paper on ‘‘ Spontaneous Hybrids among Hardy plants,” remarks: ‘‘ Orchis

foliosa makes hybrids with O. maculata. I have for many years grown O. |

foliosa as a hardy plant. Some years ago I noticed spotted leaves among
them, but now that I have picked out many of these plants I find plain
leaves are as common in.them as spotted. The flower spike is longer, the
flower smaller, and the general character and habit partake of both parents”’
(Gard. Chron., 1899, i. p. 179). The seeds germinate freely in suitable
spots. We should like to see examples of this hybrid.

We should say that O. Braunii may be looked for wherever the two
parents grow intermixed, and here also might be found other intermediate
forms of quite doubtful identity, as the following considerations will show.
It is now known that when a fertile hybrid is self-fertilised, or re-crossed
with either parent, partial or even complete reversion sometimes takes
place, and forms appear among the seedlings that would be referred to one
or the other parent species if their origin were not known. Such forms are
probably common in nature where species that will hybridise happen to
grow intermixed, and this would account for the series of perplexing
intermediate forms seén in the present case. In such localities hybridisation
may have been going on for an indefinite number of generations, and thus
obliterate the natural limits of the species. It isa significant fact that
these intermediate forms do not occur where the species grow separately,
though of course the species vary within their own limits.

It would be interesting if someone would make the cross, in the hope of
reconstructing the hybrid, or self-fertilise a typical example of the wild
hybrid, and let us see what reversion such a batch of seedlings would show.
The chief difficulty would be to get the seedlings up, but our hybridists
would be equal to the task if they would attempt it. R. A. ROLFE.

Juty, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 203

* THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
THE warm and sunny weather that we have lately been experiencing has
had a beneficial effect upon the growth of the plants, enabling new bulbs to
plump up and become well matured, and where this is the case satisfactory
flowering can be confidently expected. Endeavour to keep the internal
temperature of the house as near to 65° degrees as possible, this being best
achieved by judicious damping and shading, with abundant ventilation.

Should really seasonable weather still continue, damping the floor,
staging, and pots will usually be needed three to four times a day, the
plants themselves receiving a gentle spray overhead.in the late afternoon.
Keep a strict watch for all insect pests, and sponge the leaves of all the
Orchids at frequent intervals. Although abundance of fresh air is of the
utmost importance for the successful development of cool Orchids, yet be
careful never to give ventilation in such a manner that draughts are caused.

In specially constructed Orchid houses the bottom ventilators will be
found to be placed under the staging, and on a level with the hot water
pipes. In the majority of amateur’s greenhouses, however, the ventilators
are made to open level with the staging. Personally I would always advise
the intending cultivator to have these altered if constructed on the latter
plan, as better success with cool Orchids will be gained in houses with the
bottom ventilators constructed under the staging.

At the recent Chelsea Show amateurs must have been much struck
with the magnificent Odontoglossum hybrids to be seen in every group, and
how that those of early raising are procurable at moderate cost, I would
advise their cultivation in place of the old species, as they are freer
flowering, and, . being of stronger constitution, will better submit to
indifferent treatment at the hands of a beginner.

It is still, in my opinion, too warm to attempt the repotting of any
Orchids, though any plant intended for exhibition at the summer shows
may receive a top-dressing of sphagnum moss, care being taken, however,
not to remove sufficient of the old compost to disturb the roots.

Odontoglossum grande should by now have recovered from the effects of
Tepotting, and will probably require a good dose of water daily, as it must
be grown in a position where it can get much sun, and will consequently
dry more quickly than other plants which are well shaded.

The present is a good time to increase the stock of any Odontogiossums
possessed, by severing the rhizome connecting the pseudobulbs. A clean
sharp cut must be made, leaving two bulbs to support the new lead. Do
Not remove the severed portion until a growth is seen to be forming, and it
is by no means certain that every back bulb will start again into growth.

204 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913-

ORCHIDS: THEIR POPULARITY AND CULTURE.
(Concluded from page 111). au
ANOTHER important requisite in the culture of all Orchids is full and free
ventilation, not only during the daytime but also by night, when it can be

managed without creating a draught. It needs only to be considered that '

the greater portion of Orchids are epiphytes, growing, in their natural
conditions, on the branches of trees and, in many cases, isolated positions
on hill sides, to convince anyone that they are subject, in their native
home, to a circulation of air, therefore under cultivation they should be
supplied with abundance of this very important element, in fact, it is
absolutely necessary, for as it is with light so it is with air. If there is any
shortage in the supply of either of these factors the whole substance of the
plants, leaves, bulbs, and roots, are deficient in the solidity indispensable to
keep up a healthy existence. Judicious use, therefore, of the ventilators of
the houses is always important at all seasons of the year. To freely
ventilate the houses on hot, sunny days, and to admit air only by a chink
on dull days and by night is, to my mind, a most absurd practice. This
close-shutting system, especially at night, with a view to keeping up 4
desired temperature, produces on plant life an amount of mischief difficult
to calculate. I never could see the reason why ventilation, if so beneficial
during the daytime, should not be equally so during the night. Fresh air
all night, with reasonable temperature, must be more conducive to health
and vigour than anything approaching a stuffy atmosphere.

- The proper atmosphere of an Orchid house is one in which the air is
constantly changing, keeping the temperature in accordance with the
occupants ot the house, and sufficient moisture in the air to create @
buoyant feeling, so heat, air, and moisture, to use a familiar expression, g°
hand in hand. Whenever the temperature permits of free ventilation the
atmosphere requires to be replenished in a like ratio. A constantly changing
and well-balanced temperature is one of the most important points in the
culture of these beautiful plants.

Speaking of moisture brings me to a very important matter, and that is
the watering of Orchids. There is no more important operation connected
with their culture, and none oftener mismanaged. Who will say this does
not apply to the cultivation of all plants in pots under glass? Even the
most experienced practitioner needs all his wits about him if the work is tO
be done with despatch. In watering a mixed house of Orchids this is
especially the case, even when all are in full growth, allowance always
being necessary for the condition and quantity of compost about the roots,
and the comparative vigour of the plants. The majority of the terrestrial
kinds require proportionately more water at the roots than the epiphytal

at

=

JULY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 205

kinds, as they do not possess in a like degree the power of drawing
supplies from the atmosphere. This is an interesting faculty which is
being considered more and more by growers of the present century. The
ability of epiphytal kinds to take up little or much moisture is mainly
determined by the amount of air they receive, and also by the light and
description of the house in which they are grown. Light and air naturally
enable any plant to take up more moisture by means of its roots, and these
organs of nutrition must be in a suitable medium. Any great excess of
moisture will cause young roots in course of formation to die prematurely,

-and often times result in the death of the older ones. Rain water is
‘preferable for all plants as being purest and most natural, and Orchids
‘should receive no other, especially epiphytes, for in their natural state they

can never experience the effect of any other kind.

With regard to the roots of Orchids, and compost for same, most
Orchids, when growing naturally, have their roots in a great measure
exposed to the air on trees and rocks to which they cling, with the head
of the plants extending to the light, and generally where decomposed
vegetable matter has accumulated within reach of their roots. It is
obvious, therefore, that if the roots of such epiphytes are potted in a
compost which is at all adhesive, they will very soon perish; at the same
time, loosely-potted plants do not grow so strongly as when a more or less
substantial material is employed, and firmer potting practised. English
peat of the best quality for epiphytal Orchids is now almost unobtainable
in large quantities. From the early ‘nineties there has been an increasing
scarcity of this material, but it is only about ten years since osmunda fibre
from America and polypodium fibre from the Continent have been proved
to be satisfactory substitutes. These materials have gradually found favour,
and are now extensively used as a rooting medium for Orchids. The early
€xperiments, which led up to its extensive use, were carried out at
Westonbirt. Other necessary materials employed in the potting of Orchids
are good fibrous peat, fresh sphagnum moss, clean crocks, charcoal, and
coarse silver sand. Some good turfy loam of a not too sandy description is
required for strong-growing plants such as Cypripediums, Calanthes,
Cymbidiums, Phaius, Pleiones, and other kinds.

The process of potting Orchids is not difficult, and cultivators should

‘Make a golden rule of never to pot a plant until the roots show signs of

activity. When repotting is done just before new roots actually do appear,
the compost is fresh and sweet for them, and they seldom fail to take
advantage of it. There is no special season for potting Orchids, but the
observant cultivator watches his plants, affording them fresh food when
they need it. Teak-wood baskets, perforated pots and pans, and common
garden pots of the usual pattern are all used as receptacles. Of the three I

206 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (JULY, 1913-

prefer the latter for the majority of Orchids, and shallow teak-wood baskets
for Phalznopsis and small-growing epiphytes. One main point is to secure
perfect drainage—a point some are apt to overlook, but the fact is, the
more water a plant requires the more perfect drainage should be given,
‘otherwise the compost soon becomes stagnant and sour. Over-potting
should at all times be avoided, and the rooting material employed should
be worked in amongst the roots, pressing it firmly about them, for, as I
have already remarked, loosely-potted Orchids never thrive well, and loose
compost retains too much water. Experience teaches me that it is not the
quantity of water afforded the plant which influences it for good or ill, but
the amount actually absorbed and retained by the compost, and that the
healthiest Orchids are those that require water most often; hence the
compost should be firm, and ona well-drained bottom.

Another matter in connection with the cultivation of Orchids, and one
in which some growers, beginners especially, are liable to make mistakes is
the treatment during the resting period. This term “rest” is, I fear, often
misunderstood. It does not imply a periodical shrivelling of the plant by
withholding water and lowering the temperature, but more of what I may
term a compromise as regards temperature and atmospheric condition.
The resting period of most Orchids takes place more or less during the
winter, a time of year when the temperature is lower and evaporation is not
so rapid, and it is then that the plants require less atmospheric moisture
and water at the roots. It is principally on this point that a considerable
amount of knowledge and experience is required to adapt the varying
conditions so as to meet the needs of the different plants. For example,
the distichous-leaved section require more frequent watering during their
inactive period than any pseudobulbous kinds, Vandas, Phalenopsis, and
similar kinds requiring sufficient moisture in the rooting material to keep
the foliage plump and firm.

Orchids which are over-dried during winter will often lose many of their
leaves when the sap begins to circulate freely in the spring. On the other
hand, too much moisture when:the roots are inactive leads to damping;
spot, and other attendant evils. The impression existing in the minds of
some growers that a severe drying of Cattleyas, Lzlias, Dendrobiums, and
other pseudobulbous kinds is necessary to induce them to flower is a great
mistake. Those Orchids that require keeping dry at the root during their
season of rest benefit to an extent dependent on the conditions under which
they have been grown. If cultivated on common-sense principles, with as
much light and air as they require, the leaves and pseudobulbs are solid
and stout in texture, especially those which are evergreen, the plants are,
materially, better able to bear a lengthened period of drought without
‘shrivelling to the extent which proves injurious to the foliage. While there

JuLy, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 207

is no royal road to Orchid culture other than the long and certain one of
observation and practical experience, Orchids can be grown, and successfully,
by the born gardener who is a good cultivator of ordinary greenhouse
plants, if he takes to them and really studies their wants, and, since so
many of the most showy and useful kinds are sold so cheaply, a large
measure of quiet enjoyment can be derived from these interesting plants
without extravagant expenditure.

In conclusion I will remark that the one matter which has, more than
any other, revolutionised Orchid culture is the art of hybridising and
raising seedling Orchids. The important part of Orchidology has created
an entirely new interest, and fanciers are no longer dependent on
importations of the plants from foreign countries. At the present day
seedling Orchids are raised freely, and these home-raised plants more often
than not are far more easily cultivated than imported plants, naturally
so because they are acclimatised from birth. This combination of
circumstances could scarcely fail to make for advancement, and it is to
these, together with the reduction in price of Orchids, and last, but not
least, to the intelligence and sagacity of our practical growers, on whom
laid, in the past, the responsibility of cultivating rare and costly collections,
that the wonderful progress is due, and which has exploded for ever the
idea that England is, as Sir Joseph Hooker once observed, the grave of
tropical Orchids.

A very interesting discussion ielicwed: Mr. Challis, gardener to the Earl
of Pembroke, in the course of his remarks said his experience had been that
it was better to have the house dry at times. During the last twenty years
he had been trying to see what dryness Orchids would bear, and as far as
Cattleyas were concerned he found that unless they were in an extremely
sunny window the house was better without moisture than in a saturated
house. Mr. Challis also raised the question of manures, especially pointing
out that Orchids in their wild state received a certain amount of ammonia
and carbonic acid from the air.

Mr. Alexander said he had experimented on Vandas with various
manures, but he found that those which were without manure did much
better than those which had been manured. Fresh air and light » was the
very life of everything on this earth.

Mr. Tauser regretted, that Bath at the present time had gone down in
Orchid culture. He thought all employers should keep just a few in order
that when their younger gardeners left to go elsewhere, where there might
be a large collection, they would not go without experience.

Mr. Alexander, who had brought with him a choice collection of blooms,
then gave an interesting history of their parentage, and one which he
Showed, a hybrid between Cymbidium Lowiannm and C. insigne, he

208 THE: ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913

mentioned had been in bloom since the first week in’ December, and he
would guarantee would last in water for six weeks. By the kindness- of Sir
George Holford, Mr. Alexander also brought about thirty paintings of
Orchids by Miss Waters Anson, who is a well-known painter of flowers,
which were‘very much ‘admired: A hearty Vote of Thanks'was accorded
to Mr. Alexander, who, ‘it was pointed out, was a Bathonian by birth.
ODONTOGLOSSUM SEEDLINGS.

PHOTOGRAPHS of two choice seedling Odontoglossums have been sent to
us from the collection of F. S. Roberts, Esq., Bannerfield, Selkirk, together

Fig. 36. ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM VAR. FLETCHERI.

with a flower of each, and we have much pleasure in figuring them. Mr.
Roberts writes : ‘‘ Quite a number of fine varieties have bloomed from each
batch of.seedlings, but my- gardener, Mr. Clark, and_I are agreed that, so
far, these two are the best. In each case the seed was sown in the summer
of 1908, and both plants are flowering from the fourth bulb. As the plants
are small the spikes were disbudded, and only two blooms were taken.”
Figure 36 represents a seedling obtained from O. crispum apiculatum
fertilised with the pollen of O. c. Lucianii, and, as will be seen from the
figure, the seedling is of excellent shape, with broad toothed segments, and
the ground colour white, with one large round purple blotch on each. It

Jury, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 209

is a very charming form, and we suggest for it the name of O. crispum var.
Fletcheri. Figure 37 shows a seedling raised from O. crispum Jeanette
crossed with the pollen of O. armainvillierense (ardentissimum).. This also

Fig. 37. ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM VAR. CLARKII.

has an excellent shape, and broad segments, with a white ground colour,
slightly tinged with rose, and numerous’ large claret-coloured blotches on
each, while the lip has one large blotch in front of the crest, and a few
smaller spots at the base. This we propose to call O. eximium var. Clarki.
Both are charming acquisitions.

+

CONTINUOUS ORIGIN OF UNIT-CHARACTERS.—The brilliant progress in
heredity of the last nine years, beginning in 1903 with the rediscovery of
Mendel’s law, should not blind us to the four.broad inductions from
paleontology, that transformation is a matter of thousands or hundreds of
thousands of years, that to the living observer all living things may be
delusively stationary, that invisible tides of genetic change may be setting
in one direction or another observable only over very long periods of time,
that discontinuous mutations or saltations may be mere ripples on the
surface of these tides.—Dr. H. F. OSBORN

210 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JuLy, 1y1z

ORCHIDS FOR CUT BLOOM,

THE collection of Orchids formed by Messrs. Swan & Price, St. Albans, is
mainly for supplying the cut flower trade, and on calling there the other
day we found many interesting features. On entering the first house a fine
batch of Dendrobium Phalenopsis at once arrested our attention, with
another large consignment of the same species just unpacked. Many plants
of D. formosum and Dalhou-nobile weré also pictures of health.

In the next house were many fine plants of Cypripedium bellatulum and
niveum, all in robust condition, and comprising such excellent varieties of
the former as Queen of Spain, Oakdene var. and album. Many white
Cattleyas were also pointed out, mostly not in flower, but a nice C.
Mendelii was just opening its flowers, whilst two grand specimens of C.
Fabia’ x Leliocattleya callistoglossa were just starting into growth.

The next structure was entirely devoted to Cattleyas and their allies.
A good batch of imported C. Mossize and Lelia purpurata were
re-establishing themselves nicely, whilst in bloom were C. Schroedere with
white sepals and petals, Brassocattleya Maronii and Thorntonii, Brasso-
lzlia Helen and Veitchii.

Two following houses were filled with the choicest of Cypripedium
hybrids, from which a grand display of bloom is expected this winter, one
structure alone being devoted to C. insigne Sandere.

The corridor connecting these houses contains a_ large beach of
Cymbidiums, white Lzlia anceps in great variety, and about three hundred
plants of a very good type of Dendrobium Wardianum.

We next came to two low-built structures, in the first of which an
exceptionally fine batch of unflowered Miltonia vexillaria were growing
finely. Some idea can be conveyed of the robustness of these Orchids
when it is remarked that the majority carried three spikes to one bulb, and
in one case I observed five. A very good type of Odontoglossum crispum
is possessed, whilst the only known example of O. c. Ethel Rogerson had
large, well-shaped flowers, blotched with vivid claret. A fine plant of
Oncidium crispum was also in bloom.

The last house contained large batches of Odontoglossum seedlings,
including many O. Edwardii crosses, and Odontiodas of the last named, O-
Bradshawiz, a good O. Charlesworthii and O. beechensis (O. Rolfe x C-
Neetzliana) making a good display.

_ The collection is in thriving condition, and reflects the greatest credit
upon Mr. W. C. Price, who has the entire charge of the Orchids, and who,
it will be remembered, was formerly Orchid grower to the late Mr. E. J-
Rogerson, and Calendar writer to the Orchid Review,

C. ALWYN HARRISON.

Juty, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 2IP

LALIA PURPURATA AS A PARENT.

THE appearance of a hybrid between Lelia purpurata and the remarkable:
Cattleya citrina, under the name of Leliocattleya Freak (as recorded at
. page 221) calls attention to the possibilities and limitations of the former as.
a parent. No other species has given such a series of magnificent garden
hybrids as has this fine Lelia, which the late Mr. B. S. Williams once-
remarked had often been designated the “‘ King of Orchids,” on account of
its merits as a free-growing and showy exhibition plant. Its qualities.
remain, and it to-day the species is less popular than formerly the eclipse is
largely due to the brilliancy of its own children. Look at the hybrids.
comprised under the names of Leliocattleya Canhamiana, Aphrodite,
Dominiana, and Fascinator, to mention only a few of those obtained by
crossing L. purpurata with the Cattleyas of the labiata group. And the
list might be extended, for it has been crossed with every member of the
labiata group, and the changes are now being rung with the secondary
hybrids, which promise some further additions.

In the Orchid Stud-Book we find no fewer than forty-seven hybrids for
which L. purpurata is partly responsible, namely, twenty-four Cattleyas,
thirteen Leelias, five Lzeliocattleyas, two Epidendrums, and one Brasso-
cattleya, with Brassavola Digbyana and Sophronitis grandiflora, and the
list has since been extended, chiefly among secondary hybrids.

The series commenced with Lzliocattleya’ Dominiana, which flowered:
for the first time in 1878, though at that time the Lzlia purpurata parentage
was not known. In fact the second parent was said to be “‘some Laelia,
probably elegans,” which reminds us that the plant so long known as Lelia
elegans is itself a natural hybrid between L. purpurata and Cattleya
Leopoldii, though it was long supposed to be a wild species; in fact it
originally appeared and was described under the name of Cattleya elegans.
before the existence of Lelia purpurata was known. It is now called
Lezliocattleya elegans. The other natural hybrid of L. purpurata is L.-c.
Schilleriana, which was originally described under the name of Lelia
Schilleriana, and afterwards confused for a long time with L. elegans. The
point was ultimately cleared up, and Since then the parentage of both:
natural hybrids has been proved experimentally.

The hybrids of L. purpurata with the long-bulbed Cattleyas are less.
showy, chiefly due to the smaller flowers and less brilliant colours of the
latter, and partly also to the fact that the entire lip of the one does not
combine well with the three-lobed lip of the other. L.-c. elegans and.
Schilleriana, however, belong to this group, and were formerly extremely
popular. Crosses with other Lzlias are not to be’ compared with the
Lzliocattleyas in point of beauty, though with the L. cinnabarina group L.

212 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

purpurata has yielded two or three free-flowering hybrids’of novel colour.
Sophrolelia heatonensis, the hybrid with Sophronitis grandiflora, is a
charming little plant, but the combinations with Epidendrum are not of
much account, the small flowers and different shape of the latter, and in the
case of E. radicans the straggling habit, not forming a good combination.
The hybrid with Brassavola Digbyana is more promising, while Brasso-
catlzlia Veitchii, in which the characters of L. purpurata and Brassocattleya
Veitchii are combined, is remarkably handsome. It is perhaps here and
among the secondary hybrids of the Cattleya labiata group that further
developments may be expected.

Leeliocattleya Freak is remarkable for having almost the habit of
Cattleya citrina, with greenish yellow sepals and petals and a whitish lip
striped with purple. It might be interesting to re-cross it with the Cattleya.

ORCHIDS AT BRUSSELS.

M. FIRMIN LAMBEAU’sS COLLECTION.
ORCHID culture in Belgium, as elsewhere, is advancing with rapid strides,
and the magnificent group for which M. Firmin Lambeau was awarded the
King’s prize at the recent Ghent Quinquennial Exhibition will long be
remembered, A few days later we had the pleasure of seeing the collection
itself, and now propose to describe a few of its leading features, though the
difficulty of giving an adequate account of such a fine collection in the space
at disposal necessitates the suppression of many interesting details. Like
many others, the collection had a small beginning. M. Lambeau began
to grow Orchids in 1897, a few plants then finding a home among
-miscellaneous greenhouse subjects. The arrangement was temporary, and
a year later a Cool house was built for Odontoglossums, which was followed
by another for Cattleyas and others requiring a warmer climate. The
results were favourable, and the collection grew until eighteen houses of
various kinds were successively built. M. Lambeau then moved from
Chateau Precklinden to his present residence, Villa Vogelsang, near
Brussels, where he has built an entirely new set of houses on the latest
principles.

These houses are ten in number, and their dimensions twenty-two
metres long by three and a-quarter wide. They are disposed right and left
of a centre corridor some six metres wide, the total area being about 1000
square metres. The houses are arranged with a central path and side
stages, and ventilated by a system of gearing fixed in the central corridor.
The heating is by means of two central boilers, each of which can be
isolated by means of valves in case of accident. The potting shed and
general workroom is situated at the end of the corridor, so that everything
«an be done without taking the plants outside.

JULY, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 213

We now come to the plants themselves, which are estimated to exceed
ten thousand in number, with a large number of seedlings not yet potted
off, in fact an extensive series of hybridisation experiments is in progress, a
few of which we shall be able to mention. Passing from the Corridor into
the first Cool house we noticed about twenty Odontiodas in flower, together
with the Cochlioda Neoetzliana parent, among them being the pretty little
O. Graireana and O. loochristiensis (C. Noetzliana xX O. gloriosum), also a
few Odontoglossum Clytie (Edwardii x Pescatorei),O. Adrianzeand others,
with a fine lot of seedlings in various stages, the tiny pots of the smaller
ones being plunged about thirty together in pans of moss to prevent
drying of the compost. Among the larger ones a particularly interesting
batch from O. Edwardii x Miltonia vexillaria was pointed out, and the
question as to what they would be like can now be answered, for this
hybrid was described at page 177 under the name of Odontonia brugensis.
Lath roller-blinds are used as shading, with an additional thir coat of
whitening for the summer months. We noted also a layer of tobacco
stalks laid on the hot-water pipes, which is said to be a very effective check
to thrip.

The next house contained a very fine lot of Odontoglossums in spike
and flower, the latter including about thirty good spotted forms of O.
crispum, a fine O. amabile with clusters of purple spots near the base, and
many other hybrids, while the magnificent Odontioda Coronation carried a
spike of fifteen flowers. Here were many seedlings, and all plants were in
robust health. This house was divided, and in the second half were a lot.
of typical O. crispum in bloom, with examples of O. Pescatorei, four good
plants of O, pulchellum, a few O. Rossii, O. Thompsonianum, and a few
Masdevallias, including M. coccinea, M. ephippium, and a good plant of
M. Arminii with fourteen flowers. We noted a pan used by M. Lambeau
which gives excellent results. It contains a central pedestal on which the
plant stands, and is thus elevated above a small surrounding pool of water
which helps to keep the plant cool and moist. The pedestal has a hole
through the centre, so does not obstruct the drainage.

The next house contained many Miltonias in excellent health, including
M. vexillaria with a nine-flowered spike, the beautiful varieties G. D. Owen,
Queen Alexandra and chelseiensis, M. Bleuana, and a self-fertilised form of
the same, the first of a batch to flower. It is most like M. vexillaria, with
a rosy basal blotch to the petals, and is very promising. Here also was M.
Bleuana X M. vexillaria G. D. Owen, the base of the lip being yellow and
brown without any crimson mask. We further noted Odontonia Firminii,
from M. vexillaria and an unspotted O. crispum, some large unflowered
seedlings from O. Pescatorei x M. vexillaria, Cochlioda Neetzliana x M-
arewices. in spike, young seedlings of Odontioda Charlesworthii x M-

214 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913

vexillaria, a number of young Cymbidiums, some good Oncidium Marshall-
ianum in bloom, with Lycaste cochleata, Maxillaria Sanderiana, Sobralia
macrantha alba, Saccolabium curvifolium, and others.

Passing into a Cattleya house, where the plants were in robust health,
‘we found examples of C. Mossiz, C. Schilleriana, and a few others in
bloom, and the beautiful C. Warneri alba in sheath was pointed out, also a
batch of seedlings from C. Skinneri x Brassavola Digbyana. Batches of
Lelia anceps and Cypripedium Rolfei were in thriving condition, also three
plants of Vanda Marguerite Maron, while Dendrobium ageregatum and
D. nobile were in bloom. The Cattleyas are grown in osmunda fibre.

The next house contains a lot of Cattleyas in all stages, and we noticed
‘seed pods on C. Schilleriana and various others, also two Phalzenopsis
Lueddemanniana in bloom, one of them with six spikes, with Catasetum
™macrocarpum and the handsome C. splendens var. imperiale, the latter the
type plant. Here was also a good batch of Vanda ccerulea.

The seedling house proved extremely interesting, and contained thousands
of plants in various stages, from the tiniest germinating seedlings, in fact
hybridising is practised on a very extensive scale. The seedlings are grown
in the usual closed frames,.and are sown on canvas and then pricked off
and grown on in the usual way. We were much struck with the freedom
with which some of the seeds germinate, but M. Lambeau remarked that
this applies chiefly to the primary hybrids, for some of the secondary
crosses have proved much more difficult. The seedlings generally were in
thriving condition, and contained many whites, but we cannot ennumerate
them. They are carefully recorded by a system of numbers, and already
‘over a thousand seedlings of Cattleya, Leliocattleya and Brassocattleya,
have flowered, while a large number are approaching that condition. M.
Lambeau will have abundant material to select from.

We now passed through four other houses largely devoted to the
Cattleya group, and we noted a lot of good C. Schroeder, C. Mendelii
x Lelia cinnabrosa, with acuminate segments and the colour of the former,
C. Skinneri x L. tenebrosa, with two spikes of purple flowers, Lzlio-
<attleya Hyeana, two L.-c. Doris with deep orange flowers, L.-c. Myra
with white sepals and petals, Brassocattleya Maronii, Epidendrum
Parkinsonianum, a few Phalenopsis amabilis, Renanthera Imschootiana,
and others. A lot of white Cattleyas not in bloom were pointed out, and a
capsule of C. Mossiz Wageneri x C. Warscewiczii alba, a very promising
cross. There are others, for M. Lambeau purchased the plant of C.
Warscewiczii alba and used it on all the whiter forms that were available.
The beautiful white form of C. Adonis (C. M. Wageneri x Warscewiczii
Frau Melanie Beyrodt), was also pointed out, and numerous batches of
unflowered seedlings.

JuLy, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 215

The Cypripedium house contains a fine collection of choice varieties,
the majority not now in bloom, but there were many C. Lawrenceanum,
good examples of C. Helvetia, bellatulum, Helen, glaucophyllum, and
several hybrids of the latter, which prove rather disappointing, being dingy
in colour and inferior to their parent in point of beauty. The plants are
grown mostly in yellow loam, and are in excellent health. M. Lambeau
pointed out quantities of seedlings, and remarked that here they germinate
with the greatest freedom, while if sown on fibre they are washed down
among the compost and lost. . Miltonia Roezlii grows well here, and was in
bloom.

Passing along the Corridor, where several Oncidium sphacelatum were
in bloom, with Angraecum sesquipedale, Cattleya Skinneri, and a few others,
we came to the large workroom, where M. Lambeau showed us a very fine
series of paintings, among which we noted Miltonia Bleuana var. Peetersiz
with a deep rosy blotch on the sepals and petals and a pale margin, M.
vexillaria x var. Leopoldii, a large rosy flower with a crimson mask on the
lip, Catasetum splendens var. imperiale, Odontonia Firminii, Lzeliocattleya
Firminii, Odontoglossum crispum Souverin, white with red spots round the
lip, Odontioda Coronation and Vogelsang, both very handsome, Cattleya
Trianz coerulea, with a second painting because the flowers had altered so
much when the plant became strong, the handsome C. Enid var. Firmin
Lambeau, C. Warscewiczii alba, C. Hardyana alba, and another very
charming ally, from C. Mantinii (Bowringiana X Dowiana aurea) recrossed
with C. D. aurea, giving a flower like the latter in shape, but rather smaller,
and with white sepals and petals and a very rich crimson lip. It is
another case of white coming from the union of yellow and purple.

We congratulate M. Lambeau, and his able gardener, M. de Munter, on
their success, for the collection is indeed in excellent condition, and the
seedlings. are so numerous that the building of additional houses is
contemplated, and for this the necessary land is available. We shall hope
to record some of the results from time to time.

EPIDENDRUM AMBIGUUM.—A plant of this graceful and pretty Central
American species is now flowering at Kew, having been obtained from
Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, under the name of E. Candollei. It
originally flowered in the collection of S. Rucker, Esq., of Wandsworth, in
July, 1846, and was sent to Dr. Lindley for determination, and figured in
the Botanical Register (1847, t. 53), under the name of E. elatum, Batem.
When Lindley came to revise the genus the mistake was detected, and the
Species was then described under the name of E. ambiguum, Lindl. (Fol. Orch.,
Epidendr., p. 18), with the habitat “ Wild in Guatemala.” The flowers
were described as pale yellowish green, very sweet scented, and the lip

216 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (Juy, 1913,

straw-colour, spotted and streaked with rose. It was placed next to E.
aromaticum Batem., to which Lindley well-pointed out it was more nearly
allied. It may have been from one of G. Ure Skinner’s importations.
Since then it seems to have been little heard of. The Kew plant bears a
graceful panicle, over a foot high, with seven branches and about eighty

flowers. R.A

ODONTOGLOSSUM EMPRESS OF INDIA.
THE annexed figure represents the very beautiful Odontoglossum Empress

of India (parentage unrecorded), which was exhibited by Messrs.

Fig. 38. OponroGLossum Empress oF INDIA.

Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, at the present Show of the R.H.S-
at Chelsea. It bore aspike of nineteen flowers, and made a beautiful
picture. The shape of the flowers is well shown in the figure, and the
colour may be described as deep blush, with chocolate-coloured, markings,
and the blotches on the lip decidedly darker in colour. It is a very
charming acquisition, and apparently shows the influence of O. crispum
and some O. Harryanum hybrid.

JuLy, 1913.] LHE ORCHID REVIEW. 21

“I

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HorrIcuLTURAL.
THE following list of awards made at the R.H.S. Spring Show, held at the
Royal Hospital, Chelsea, on May 2oth, 21st, and 22nd, were crowded out of
our last issue.

Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair), and
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), H. G. Alexander, F. Sander, Jj. E. Shi,
}..Cy em H. J. Chapman, Gurney Wilson, F. M. Ogilvie, R. G. Thwaites,
J. S. Moss, W. H. Hatcher, S. F lory, Sir Jeremiah Colman, Stuart Low,

Fig. 39: CATTLEYA LAWRENCEANA. Mary-REGINA.

W. Cobb, A. Dye, W. P. Bound, J. Wilson Potter, C. 1: Lucas, ®.
Brooman White, W. H. White, W. Bolton, E. Ashworth, F. J. Hanbury,
and R. A. Rolfe.

The special judges for Orchids, including the Davidson Cup, were: W.
Bolton, de Barri Crawshz ry, and J. Gurney Fowler.

THE DavipDsoN CupP.

The Davidson Cup for the best Cattleya in the Show, not a hybrid, was
awarded to Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, for the beautiful
Cattleya Lawrenceana Mary-Regina, bearing two spikes of flowers, which

were more distinctly blush in colour than when previously exhibited.

218 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

CATTLEYA EMPRESS FREDERICK VAR. ALBA (Dowiana aurea X Mossiz
Reineckeana).—A beautiful form, with cream white sepals and petals, and
a deep yellow lip, with pale margin and some crimson lines at the base.
Exhibited by Messrs. Mansell & Hatcher, Rawdon, E. Yorks.

L#LIOCATTLEYA BoyLEI GATTON VAR. (L. anceps Stella x C. Trianz).
—A beautiful large and blush white variety, with the disc of the lip yellow.
Exhibited by Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park (gr. Mr. Collier).

L#LIOCATTLEYA BRITANNIA WESTONBIRT VAR. (L. Canhamiana X C.
Warscewiczii).—A very large and handsome form, having rosy lilac sepals
and petals, and an intense purple-crimson lip, with yellow in the throat.
The plant bore two spikes, of three and four flowers. Exhibited by Lt.-
Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

L#LIOCATTLEYA SyLviA PRINCESS VICTORIA LovIsE (Ascania X
Phcebe).—A very beautiful form, bearing two spikes of deep yellow flowers,
with the front of the lip crimson, and some veining in the throat. Exhibited
by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath.

MILTONIA CHARLESWORTHII (Hyeana xX _ vexillaria memoria G. D.
Owen).—A large and beautiful deep rose-pink form, with a crimson mask
at the base of the lip. Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

ODONTIODA CHANTECLEER ORCHIDHURST vaR. (C. Neetzliana X
Odontioda Cooksoniz).—A large and very dark scarlet form bearing a very
fine inflorescence. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

ODONTOGLOSSUM OTHMARSCHEN (parentage unrecorded).—A very large
and handsome form, approaching O. mirum, and having broad sepals and
well-toothed petals, with solid claret blotches on a white ground. Exhibited
by Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill).

OpONTOGLOSSUM QUEEN OF GATTON (triumphans Xx _ percultum).—A
very fine form, bearing a spike of fifteen deep yellow flowers, heavily
blotched with ced-brown. Exhibited by Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

BRASSOCATTLEYA VILMORINIANA VAR. ETNA (C. Mossize X_ B.-¢
Leemanniz).—A very large and handsome form, with bright rose-coloured
sepals and petals, and a broad, well-fringed, and richly-coloured lip, with a
yellow throat and some dark lines. Exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

BRASSOCATLELIA EXCELSIOR (L.-c. George Woodhams X B. Digbyana).
—A large and richly-coloured hybrid, having rosy purple sepals and petals,
and a rich rose-purple fringed lip, with some dark veining in the yellow
throat. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

CaTTLEYA MENDELII May QuEEN.—A beautiful white form, with the
front of the lip rich purple, and the throat yellow. Exhibited by Messrs:
J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge.

JULY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 219

CYMBIDIUM GOTTIANUM SUPERBUM (eburneum X insigne).—A beautiful
blush white form, with some rosy spots on the lip. Exhibited by Messrs.
J. & A. McBean.

LZLIOCATTLEYA APHRODITE SPLENDENS.—A large and beautiful form,
with blush white sepals and petals, and the lip intense purple-crimson, with
a yellow throat. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

L#&LIOCATTLEYA GANYMEDE HOoLFoRD’s VAR. (Le atone st *€,
Schroederze).—A handsome form, bearing spikes of six and eight flowers,
with copper yellow sepals and petals, and a rich crimson front lobe to the
lip. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

ODONTIODA CHARLESWORTHII PERFECTION (C. Noetzhana x O.
Harryanum).—A very fine deep crimson form, with a broad, light red lip.
Exhibited by Messrs. J. & A. McBean.

ODONTIODA CHELSEIENSIS VAR. ST. FusciEN (C. vulcanica x O.
crispum).—A large and handsome variety, bearing a fine spike of over
twenty rosy lilac flowers. Exhibited by M. Henri Graire, Amiens, France.

OponToGLossum GerorGIUS-REXx (Rolfe xX ?).—A very large and
handsome hybrid, which was figured at page 174 of our last issue. The
flowers are heavily blotched with claret-purple on a white ground, slightly
suffused with crimson and the lip very broad. Exhibited by Messrs.
Charlesworth & Co.

ODONTOGLOSSUM EXIMIUM ARMSTRONGI& (armainvillierense x crispum
var.).—A handsome form, bearing a spike of nine violet-purple flowers, with
very broad white margin to the segments. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong
& Brown.

ODONTOGLOssUM ILLUSTRISSIMUM WESTONBIRT VAR. (Lambeauianum
X armainvillierense)—A large and handsome form, having rosy claret
flowers, the segments tipped with blush white, and the lip white with dark
base. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

OvonTonta La&tia SANDER (M. Warscewiczii X O. amabile).—A hand-
Some hybrid, most like an enlarged edition of the former parent, and having
the sepals and petals heavily blotched with red-purple, and the broadly
€xpanded lip white in front. Exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

Oncipilum McBEaniANuM (macranthum x superbiens).—A handsome
hybrid, most resembling the former, and bearing a spike of numerous
flowers, with olive brown sepals, and the petals light yellow barred with
brown. Exhibited by Messrs. J. & A. McBean.

ONcIpDIODA CooKson1& ILLusTRIS (C. Neetzliana X O. macranthum).—A
very handsome form, having the flowers of a distinct orange-scarlet shade.
Exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.
CaTTLEYA Mossta MAHOMET.—To Mr. H. G: Alexander, Orchid

220 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

grower to Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford, for a finely-grown specimen, bearing
three spikes, the two best each with six richly-coloured flowers.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA SNOWFLAKE.—To Mr. H. G. Alexander, for a
noble specimen, bearing sixteen spikes and an aggregate of eighty-five
flowers.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA VIRGINALE.—To Mr. H. G. Alexander, for a
beautiful specimen bearing 125 flowers, with rosy sepals and petals and a
white lip.

SOBRALIA MACRANTHA ALBA.—To Mr. J. Davis, gr. to J. Gurney Fowler,
Esq., for a noble specimen bearing about three dozen flowers and buds.

The Council has awarded to Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., a Silver-gilt
Cup, in place of a Silver Cup, for his fine group of Orchids.

At the meeting held on June 3rd there wasa fine display of Orchids, and
the awards consisted of one Gold and eight other medals, three Awards of
Merit, two Cultural Commendations, and one Certificate of Appreciation.

Orchid Committee present : J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), and
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), J. S, Moss, J. Wilson Potter, Gurney
Wilson, R. A. Rolfe, F. Sander, Stuart Low, F. M. Ogilvie, J. Charles-
worth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, G. Hunter, W. H. White, S. Flory, W-
Bolton, R. Brooman White, de Barri Crawshay, T. Armstrong, Arthur Dye,
C. H. Curtis, J. E. Shill, Sir Harry J. Veitch, and Baron Sturlen, Holland.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), staged a very
fine group, on the stage to the left of the entrance, a Gold Medal
being awarded. It contained a fine series of Odontoglossums, noteworthy
among them being many forms of O. crispum, O. Goodsonii (Uroskinnert
X Pescatorei), O. amabile roseum, O. Wilckeanum Goodson’s var., O-
eximium Leopoldii, and O. armainvillierense Herbert Goodson, Odontioda.
Cecilia (C. Neetzliana x O. Wiganianum), Anguloa Clowesii, Bulbophyllum
galbinum, Scaphosepalum gibberosum, Masdevallia ignea, coccinear
Veitchiana, and Rushtonii, Brassolelia Veitchii, Cymbidium Lowianum,
some good Leliocattleyas, Cattleya Mossiz Wageneri, C. Lawrenceana,
C. Mendelii, Miltonia vexillaria, and numerous other good things.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, staged a choice group,
including Cattleya Mossiz Golden Reef, a large light-coloured form, with
some oblique yellow veins on the petals, suggesting staminodial influence,
Odontoglossum crispum xanthotes, O. c. Mabel, a finely-blotched form,
Lezliocattleya Cowanii, and a few others (Silver Banksian Medal).

E. R. Ashton, Esq., Camden Park, Tunbridge Wells, sent Odontioda
Adrastus (Odontioda Bohnhofia x Odontoglossum crispum), having
acuminate white sepals and petals prettily blotched with red

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),

JuLy, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 221

sent the handsome Leeliocattleya epicasta Gatton Park var., Catasetum
Colmanie, having greenish yellow flowers spotted with brown, and the
crest of the lip brown, and two plants of C. Cliftonii, one bearing a male
the other a female inflorescence.

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis),
showed Odontoglossum crispum Ruth, a handsomely blotched form.

M. Henri Graire, Amiens, France, sent Odontoglossum Saturne
(apterum X spectabile), a pretty pale yellow hybrid, blotched with light
brown, and an ample, somewhat elongated lip.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent plants of
the striking purple Oncidium Claesii, with a long twining panicle of purple
flowers, two forms of Leliocattleya Fascinator-Mossiz, and three L.-c.
Canhamiana Burford var., with white sepals and petals and a rich purple lip.

].Iucas, Esq,, Warnham Court, Horsham (gr. Mr. Duncan), sent
Odontoglossum Eva (cirrhosum X Kegeljani), having light yellow acuminate
sepals and petals spotted with brown, and a good form of O. triumphans.

E. G. Mocatta, Esq., Woburn Place, Addlestone (gr. Mr. Stevenson),
sent Odontoglossum Jasper Woburn Place var., a finely-coloured form,
bearing two spikes.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent a richly-
coloured form of Odontoglossum Aireworth.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent

. Leliocattleya Lady Roberts (L.-c. Euphrosyne x C. Dowiana aurea), a

handsome hybrid, having magenta-rose sepals and petals, and a claret-
coloured lip, with yellow veining at the base.

~ R. Brooman White, Esq., Arddarroch (gr. Mr. Smith), sent a finely-
flowered example of Odontoglossum Wilckeanum The Kaiser.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a very fine
group, including a beautiful series of Odontoglossums and Odontiodas, the
latter comprising ©. rosefieldiensis, Charlesworthii, Bradshawie, and
Vuylstekez, in numerous examples, forms of Lelia purpurata, Cattleya
Mendelii and C. Mossi, among the latter being C. Mossie Wageneri
taised from seed, a nice lot of Leliocattleya Canhamiana, Martinetii,
Ophir, and others, two very fine Coelogyne pandurata with spikes of twelve
and thirteen flowers, Bulbophyllum galbinum, Masdevallia Courtauldiana,
Epidendrum atropurpureum, Cymbidium Lowianum concolor, Microstylis
congesta, and a nice lot of Miltonias, Brassocattleyas, and Brassolzlias
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a brilliant group, including
many Lzeliocattleya Canhamiana and Fascinator, L.-c. Caledonia (C.
Mendelii x L.-c. bletchleyensis), a blush white hybrid with rich purple-
crimson lip, L.-c. Hibernia (C. Schroedere X L.-c. bletchleyensis), a pretty

222 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

rosy flower with orange throat to the lip, L.-c. Kathleen (L. tenebrosa x
L.-c. Canhamiana), a richly-coloured hybrid, a beautiful series of Miltonia
vexillaria, Bleuana, and St. Andre, good examples of Phalznopsis
Aphrodite, Trichopilia tortilis, Backhouseana, and suavis, some good
plants of Dendrobium Dearei, Maxillaria fragrans and Sanderiana, Eria
marginata, Angrecum Leonis and Sanderianum, Lusia Amesiana,
Epidendrum patens, Renanthera Imschootiana, Promenza_ xanthina,
Saccolabium gemmatum, Habenaria carnea, and some good Odontc-
glossums and Odontiodas (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including Miltonia Roezlii, and a very fine M. vexillaria Empress Augusta
Victoria bearing thirteen spikes, several good Trichopilia Backhouseana,
Vanda teres, Oncidium Kramerianum, Zygopetalum Brewii (Perrenoudii X
rostratum), fine examples of Lzliocattleya Fascinator and Canhamiana,
Odontioda Charlesworthii, Odontoglossum Doris, and others (Silver
Banksian Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a showy group,
including fine specimens of Miltonia vexillaria and Bleuana, Brassocattleya
Veitchii, Dendrobium Thwaitesiz Veitch’s var., Oncidium pulchellum,
Vanda Denisoniana, Selenipedium caudatum Sandere, Thunia Veitchiana,
Leliocattleya Canhamiana and Aphrodite, Masdevallias, &c. (Silver
Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged an interesting group, including
examples of Lzliocattleya Cowanii, Fascinator, and others, a fine Odonto-
glossum Uroskinneri, two tall plants of O. luteopurpureum, Oncidium
serratum, Miltonia_ vexillaria Cobbiana, Odontioda Charlesworthii,
Trichopilia Backhouseana, Cattleya Mossiz, &c. (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, staged a fine group, including some
good Dendrobium formosum, pulchellum, and crystallinum albens, a nice
lot of Renanthera Imschootiana, Vanda Charlesworthii, Lzeliocattleya
Canhamiana, Miltonia vexillaria and Bleuana, Cirrhopetalum picturatum,
Masdevallia Courtauldiana, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. W. B. Hartland & Son, Ballintemple, Co. Cork, sent a small
group, including Odontoglossum Harryanum and a few others, Cattleya
Mossie and Mendelii, Cypripediums, a pretty Cymbidium Veitchii X
eburneum, &c. (Bronze Banksian Medal).

Mr. H. Dixon, Spencer Park Nursery, Wandsworth Common, sent 4
good dark form of Cattleya Mossiz.

Mr. C. F. Waters, Balcombe, sent a few good Cattleyas.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

ODONTOGLOssuM AIREWoRTH OrcHID DENE VaR. (crispum X Lambeau-

ianum).—A large and richly-coloured variety, with broad rosy segments,

Aan enone teen enn

lip

Jury, 1913, THE ORCHID REVIEW. 223

well blotched with chocolate brown, and the lip white with some purple
spots below. Exhibited by E. H. Davidson, Esq.
ODONTOGLOSSUM LAIRESSEI (Edwardii Xx Cervantesii).—A_ striking

hybrid, bearing an inflorescence of eleven white flowers, with a dark blotch

at the base of the segments. Exhibited by Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart.

ODONTOGLOSsUM NEPTUNE VAR. ST. FUSCIEN (crispum X apterum).—
A handsome form with blush white flowers well blotched with brown.
Exhibited by M. Henri Graire, Amiens.

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION.

LA&ALIOCATTLEYA FREAK (C. citrina xX L. purpurata).—A remarkable
hybrid, having ovoid, 2-leaved pseudobulbs, much like those of the Cattleya
in habit, and drooping flowers, with somewhat spreading greenish sepals _
and petals, and the lip whitish with crimson-purple veins. Exhibited by
C. J. Lucas, Esq.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

CaTTLEYA Mossit#.—To Mr. W. Smith, gr. to Albert Pam, Esq.,
Malting Farm, Little Hallingbury, Bishops Stortford, for a very fine
specimen, growing in the clump originally collected four years ago, and
bearing about roo flowers and buds.

EPIDENDRUM ORGANENSE.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to
Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., for a very fine specimen of this pretty dwarf
species, bearing eighteen spikes of flowers.

At the meeting held on June 17th a few interesting groups were staged,
and the awards consisted of five medals, three Awards of Merit, and two
Cultural Commendations.

Orchid Committee present : J. Gurney Fowler, Esq, (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (Hon. Sec.), R. Brooman White, Gurney Wilson, C. J.
Lucas, W. Bolton, F. Sander, F. M. Ogilvie, F. J. Hanbury, T. Armstrong,
A. McBean, J:.E. Shill, J. Charlesworth, H. G. Alexander, A. Dye, W. H.
White, C. H. Curtis, S. W. Flory, J. S. Moss, Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.,
Sir F, W. Moore, and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), received a
Silver Banksian Medal for a select group, including three good forms of
Odontoglossum eximium, namely, Clarksonii, Goodsonii,-and Leopold, O.
Pescatorei Sidneyanum, white with purple markings on the lip, O. apterum,
O. Lambeauianum St. David, O. G. E. Day, and others.

Sir Mervyn Buller, Spratton, Northants, sent a fine form of Lelio-
Cattleya Martinetii, with copper red a see and petals, and the lip purple,
with darker veins.

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis), sent
a good example of Lycaste Imschootiana (cruenta xX Skinneri), an

22.1 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

interesting hybrid of intermediate character, whose much confused history
has been given in our pages (ii. p. 8; iv. p. 78).

Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill),
sent the richly-coloured Cattleva Warscewiczii var. Marga, and C. W.
delicata, having blush pink sepals and petals, and a white lip, with some
purple in front of the yellow disc.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent the
handsome Cattleya Mendelii His Majesty The King.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including a fine specimen of Grammangis Ellisii, Spathoglottis plicata,
Brassavola Digbyana with three flowers, Cypripedium _ bellatulum
Peristeria elata, Miltonia Bleuana_ rosea, Odontiodas, Odontoglossum
crispum xanthotes, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. S. W. Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham, staged a fine group of
Cattleya Mossiz and Mendelii; Lelia purpurata, Leliocattleya Aphrodite
Canhamiana, and C. G. Roebling, Odontoglossums, Stellis ophioglossoides,
and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, sent some beautiful forms of Cattleya
Mossiz, including the varieties Wageneri, coerulea, and Fletcheri, the latter
white with a faint blush tint, Sophrocatlelia Venus (S.-l. Psyche x C.
Mendelii), Brassdlelia Helen, and Lelia cinnabrosa (Silver Banksian
Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a good group,
including examples of Be naashiocs Imschootiana, Coelogyne pandurata,
Bulbophyllum siamense, and Godseffianum, the fine Oncidium crispum
enfieldense, Cattleya Warneri, Brassolzelia Jessopii, good specimens of
Dendrobium pulchellum, Farmeri, formosum, and various others (Silver
Banksian Medal).

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, sent good examples
of Cattleya Mossiz Wagneri, Leliocattleya Martinetii, L.-c. Aphrodite
King George V., and L.-c. C. G. Roebling.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA GASKELLIANA Farry QUEEN.—A fine white form, with blush
tint on the lip in front of the yellow disc. Exhibited by Baron Bruno
Schréder.

abieiodcun CRISPUM THE BaRONEss.—A very beautiful form, with
broadly fringed sepals and petals, and the ground colour white, with
clusters of pale violet blotches, and chestnut red blotches on the lip.
Exhibited by Baron Bruno Schréder.

OnciDiopa BELLA (C. Neetzliana x O. Marshallianum).—A striking
yellow hybrid, with red-brown blotches, most resembling the Oncidium
in general details of the flower. Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

Juuy, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 225

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

DENDROBIUM VICTORIA-REGINA.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower
to Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford, for a very fine specimen,
bearing a profusion of its striking violet-blue and white flowers. It had
been grown in the Cool house.

ODONTIODA COOKSONI2 FOWLER’S VAR.—To Mr. J. Davis, gardener to
J. Gurney Fowler., Esq., Glebelands, 5. Woodford, for a very fine specimen
of this brilliant scarlet-red hybrid.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

At the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on May 15th

the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the
Chair), Messrs. J. Cypher, Dr. Hartley, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, C. Parker,
G. Weatherby, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).
- A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), was awarded a
Silver-gilt Medal for a group of choice Odontoglossum crispum, including
vars. King of England, Britannia, Marie, Annie, F. K. Sander, Meleagris,
Orion, Bertii, Victoria-Regina, and Franz Masereel, with O. Pescatorei
album, Cattleya Schroedere varieties, and Miltonia vexillaria.

Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), was awarded a
Large Silver Medal for a good group, including Leliocattleyas in variety,
Cattleya Mendelii Duchess of York, Odontoglossum crispum and hybrids, -
with other good things.

Rey. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), sent two
plants of Cypripedium Vipanii.

Mr. J. Stott; Radcliffe, sent a nice varlety of Odontoglossum crispum.

Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge, sent Miltonia vexillaria and three
varieties of Cattleya Mendelii.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cymbidium Gottianum (insigne X eburneum), Leliocattleya gloriosa
(C. Fascinator x L.-c. Empress Frederick). Both from Col. J. Rutherford.

Odontioda Schreederiana Highfield var. (O. crispum X Bradshawiz).
From Mr. W. Shackleton.

At this meeting competitions for the following prizes during the ensuing
session were arranged :—

Silver Cup, and Prize to Gardener, for General Excellence, presented by
R. Ashworth, Esq.

Medals, and prize to Gardener, for Cypripediums, presented by J. J.
Bolton, Esq.

Silver Cup and Prize to Gardener, for Odontoglossums, presented by
Mr. E. H. Davidson. | [P.T.O.

226 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

Medal and Prize to Gardener, for Cattleyas, presented by Mr. J. Evans.

Objet d’Art, and Prize to Gardener, presented by Messrs. Charlesworth
& Co.

Prizes for Groups, presented by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

Medal for Arrangement, presented by Messrs. Cypher & Sons.

Medal, presented by the Botanic Society of Manchester.

York FLoraLt FETE AND GALA.

The fifty-fifth consecutive Show of this Society, held at Bootham Park,
York, on June r&th, roth, and 2oth, will mark another era ih its history.
The whole Show was a great success, and Orchids were more extensively
shown than for some years past.

Among non-competitive groups, first must be placed that of Messrs.
Mansell & Hatcher, Rawdon, Leeds, which was awarded a Large Gold
Medal. The group comprised many fine examples of Cattleya, Lzelio-
cattleya, Odontoglossum, Odontioda, and Cypripedium, besides many
Orchids of botanical interest. The whole was tastefully arranged, and does
credit to this young and enterprising firm.

Another group that was conspicuously good was that of Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co., Haywards Heath, which contained many hybrids of Cattleya,
Lzliocattleya, Odontioda, Oncidioda, Odontoglossum, and others. Con-
spicuous in the centre was a fine plant of Cattleya Hardyana x Lealio-
cattleya Canhamiana, a really fine flower. This select group was awarded
a Gold Medal.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, also exhibited a gronp containing
many good things, including fine examples of Leliocattleya Canhamiana
Rex, Acis, and others. They also had several Orchids of botanical interest,
and were awarded a Silver-gilt Medal.

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, in front of a group of ferns, exhibited
several specimens of Cattleya, the best of which was a superb C. Mossiz.

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, were the only exhibitors
for a table of Orchids arranged for effect, and were worthily awarded the
first prize for a light, bright, and elegant.arrangement.

Messrs. Cypher was also placed first for twelve Orchids, their finest
Specimens being Leliocattleya Aphrodite, Miltonia vexillaria Cobbiana,
Cattleya Warscewiczii, Epidendrum prismatocarpum, and Thunia Marshall-
jana. The second prize was awarded to W. P. Burkinshaw, Esq., The West
Hill, Hessle (gr. Mr. T. Barker), who had fine plants of Lelia tenebrosa
Walton Grange variety with four fine flowers on one spike, Coelogyne
pandurata, Cattleya Warscewiczii, C. Mendelii, Lzliocattleya Canhamiana,
and L.-c. C. G. Roebling. As usual, these competitors were very close
together. Mr. E. H. Davidson, Twyford, Berks., was third, with smaller

Swe ERRe SATs Onaga aaa ES ar Oates oe

JULY, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 227

specimens, which included good examples of Miltonia vexillaria, a fine
Cattleya Mossie Emperor, Lzliocattleya Excelsior (C. Mendelii x L.-c.
Canhamiana), and Odontoglossum Jasper.

There was another close contest in six Orchids, when Messrs. J. Cypher
& Sons were first, their best plants being Oncidium Marshallianum, Lelia
tenebrosa, and Vanda teres. Mr. Burkinshaw was second, having well-
grown plants of Cattleya Warscewiczii, C. Mendelii, L.-c. Lady Miller,
&c. Mr. E. H. Davidson was third, with neat, well-grown specimens.

For three Orchids Mr. E. H. Davidson was first, with Leeliocattleya
Canhamiana, Cattleya Mendelii Twyford Gem, and Odontoglossum Dora,
while Mr. Burkinshaw and Messrs. J. Cypher & Sons were second and
third respectively.

or a new or rare Orchid Mr. Burkinshaw was first, with a fine plant
of Cattleya Mossiz alba, carrying seven flowers.

In the two classes, open only to amateurs for six Orchids and three
Orchids respectively, Mr. Burkinshaw won both prizes. In the former
Lelia tenebrosa Charlesworthii, Cypripedium Boltonii, and Cattleya
Mossiz Reineckeana var. Mrs. E. M. Hanworth were conspicuous, and in
the latter a fine Miltonia Bleuana, and another C. Mossiz Reineckeana var.
Mrs. H. P. Horsley.

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR JULY.
J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.

THE delightful change in the climatic conditions has been advantageous to
most Orchids, although it may have caused the rapid fading of those flowers
which have been open for some time. It will now be possible to treat the
plants in the warmer divisions more liberally, and with the increased light
and heat extra air and moisture may be used in all departments. During
wet and cold days, however, it is necessary to use some caution, as there is
always the risk of spotting flowers if the atmosphere is heavily charged with
moisture, especially if by any means the temperature should fall at all low.
A cold, damp atmosphere is to be avoided at all times.

The temperatures. and general treatment given in the May number
should be continued, except that the ventilation and shading of the houses
will require more attention. As regards shading the plants, some districts
are subject to stronger sunshine than others, and it is obvious that more
shading is required in the South of England than is necessary here in the
East Riding of Yorkshire, where we do not experience that strong sunshine
that prevails in some districts. Sunheat is what all warm Orchids delight
in, therefore it is advisable to close the houses reasonably early in the
afternoon, so that full advantage may be obtained from it. After the great
amount of sunless weather we have experienced this spring, it will be

228 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

advisable to inure the plants gradually to the sunlight, otherwise there will
be a danger of the soft, delicate growths scorching and being disfigured. It
will also be advisable in all the warmer houses to warm the pipes slightly
at night, which will enable the cultivator to leave a little air on at the same
time. Orchids delight in a supply of fresh air at all times, and therefore it
should be given on every possible occasion.

In the cool divisions also more shading will be required in some districts
than in others. No two growers will agree as regards the amount of light
which should be afforded these plants. Some say they should receive
enough light to give the foliage a ruddy bronzy hue, while others prefer
that the foliage should always appear of a pleasing green colour. My
advice is to try a happy medium as far as possible. In this department a
cool, damp atmosphere must be maintained at all times, and spraying may
be frequently done but not carried to the extent of saturating the compost.
Every effort should be made to keep this house as cool as possible,
especially during periods of hot weather.

WATERING must now have most careful attention, as owing to the more
frequent use of the syringe and sprayer, haphazard watering involves a
danger of the compost becoming in a saturated condition. The plants
should be allowed to become fairly dry between each operation. The most
important of all details of plant culture under glass is the application of
water to the roots and in the atmosphere.

CaTTLeyas.—C. Gaskelliana labiata and many others which make their
growth during the summer months and flower during the autumn will have
made considerable progress, and already the pseudobulbs and flower sheaths
are formed. It is advisable at this season to keep these plants elevated
well up to the roof glass, so that they may receive the benefit of the light
and air to consolidate their growths. As soon as these are mature, and the
flowers are commencing to push through the sheath, the water supply at
the roots may be considerably reduced. These later summer and autumn-
flowering Cattleyas resent a super abundance of water at this particular
season, and it is often the cause of the new bulb turning black and decaying.
It may also cause the loss of the roots. Plants of C. Warscewiczii (gigas)
and other summer-flowering Cattleyas, as they pass out of flower, should
‘be placed.in cooler and drier quarters, where they may be inured to. more
light and air to ripen their pseudobulbs. By these means the plants are
prevented from making premature growths, and are induced to take a
decided rest, which is to their advantage.

La#uias.—The Mexican Lelias will be in full growth, and may have
liberal treatment as regards sunheat and water, and every inducement
should be given them to build up their pseudobulbs as quickly as possible.
‘L. purpurata, and the Lzeliocattleyas, of which this species is one parent,

Juty, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 229

may be repotted whenever young roots are seen to be pushing from the
base of the last-made pseudobulbs. Such cool-growing plants as L.
pumila, prastans, Dayana and others are developing new growths. If a
light position can be found for them in the Cool house they may remain
there until their flowers show, but at that stage they will be the better for
the increased temperature of the Intermediate house. These plants may be
afforded fresh compost whenever they begin to make new roots. They are
best cultivated in shallow pans that can be suspended close to the roof
glass. These miniature plants delight in a reasonable quantity of light and
air at all times, and a plentiful supply of water to the roots when in full
growth. The thin-bulbed L. harpophylla should also be kept in a light
position in the Cool house during the hottest portion of the year, and when
the growths are nearing completion should be removed to the Cattleya
house until their flowering period is past.

OponToGLossums.—- Plants of any of the dwarf-growing section, such as
O. Cervantesii, Galeottianium, madrense, Rossii, maculatum, and others
that are in need of new rooting material may receive attention. They are
all best grown in shallow pans suspended at the warm end of the Cool
house. A similar compost to that advised for other Odontoglossums will
answer their requirements. The compost must be placed firmly in the
Pans, as all compost which contains osmunda fibre has the power to retain
moisture in excessive quantities when loose. Water should be given care-
fully until the roots have grown freely in the new compost, after which
moisture should be liberally supplied until the growths are completed.
While in full growth the plants will be benefitted by light sprayings over-
head several times daily during hot weather. All these plants delight in a
moist and humid position, which should be considered when affording them
a position in the house in which they are grown.

COCHLIODA AND ITS HYBRIDS.—C. Neetzliana, vulcanica, and sanguinea
are best grown in shallow pans suspended from the roof of the Odonto-
glossum house. As the numerous hybrids derived from this genera as one
parent will succeed under the same conditions, they may be all treated
alike. Any repotting that is necessary should be done whenever the young
growths are about to push forth roots. With such a diversity of subjects
the repotting of this family will go on right through the season. They
should also be grown in well-drained shallow pans in the same manner as
advised for the dwarf-growing Odontoglossums.

DENDROBIUMS.—The cool-growing species, such as D. Jamesianum,
infundibulum, and others, should, as they pass out of flower and start into
growth, have attention as regards repotting, should it be necessary. Just
as the young growths commence to push roots is the best season for this
Operation. The tall growers do best in pots, the shorter ones in shallow

230 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913.

hanging pans, but in either case it is important that the plants receive
plenty of light. They should be potted firmly in the usual Dendrobium
compost. When growing actively the plants should be liberally supplied
with water at the roots, but when growth is completed much less will
suffice. During the winter months they are best removed to a light position
in a cool Intermediate house.

Oncipiums.—During the present month there are many of the cool
Oncidiums, such as O. Forbesii, crispum, Gardneri, concolor, Marshall-
ianum, and others which may require attention as regards repotting. They
should be repotted when the young growths are from three to four inches
long and are about to emit new roots. The flowers of these species are
produced on pendulous racemes, and are delightful Orchids when in bloom.
They all succeed in shallow pans, and resent having a large amount of
compost placed about their roots, therefore moderate-sized pans should be
used with a good supply of drainage. A similar compost to that used for
Odontoglossums will answer their requirement, but slightly more half-
decayed oak leaves may be added. The warmer-growing Oncidiums, such
as O. Lanceanum, luridum, carthagi , and others of this section may
also be afforded fresh rooting material as they reach the desired condition.
These plants revel in a light position in the warmest house, and whilst the
roots are growing actively they should have liberal supplies of moisture, and
the plants may be sprayed freely during bright days, but during their
resting season water should be sparingly supplied, as their fleshy leaves are
capable of withstanding a reasonable amount of drought without injury.
The cool O. macranthum and allied species that are developing flower
spikes should be given water at the roots whenever they become dry until
their flowers open. The inflorescences of all Oncidiums should be removed
soon after all the flowers are fully developed, as they exhaust the energies
of the plant. Oncidiums include some of the most beautiful and interesting
of Orchids, and it is a pity that so little progress has been made in their
culture as compared with most other groups.

GENERAL REMARKS.—Since my last notes were written another mile-
stone in horticultural history: has been passed. Those who have had
the good fortune of seeing the series of shows held in the Temple Gardens
are fully aware what an important influence the latter have had upon
Orchid culture in this and other countries. At the recent show at Chelsea
Orchids were one of the most prominent features of one of the greatest and
best shows ever held, which must be highly satisfactory to those who, like
myself, look to their popularity for a livelihood. If the strides made during
the next twenty years equal those made during the last it is hard to conceive
what will be attained, and in the hybridisation and cultivation of Orchids
there is an unlimited field of operations.

JULY, 1913.) THE ORCHID REVIEW. 231

ORCHIDS AT KEW.

THE Orchid houses at Kew are still very gay, and many interesting plants
are in bloom. Lycaste peruviana is bearing eight greenish-brown flowers,
with a paler, much-fringed lip. A fine specimen of L. Deppei, having no
fewer than fifty flowers, makes a bold show. Odontoglossum citrosmum
is flowering freely, there being about two dozen spikes of its fragrant
flowers in the Cool house. The plants were grown suspended from the
roof in the Cattleya house, where they thrive well. Eulophia paniculata is
a rare Madagascar species which is flowering in the warm division, the
erect flower spike being quite six feet high, branched, and the flowers
brownish. The pseudobulbs are rather large, and the leaves thick and
fleshy, and marbled with two shades of green. A plant of E. lurida, which
was imported from West Tropical Africa with a Bulbophyllum in the same
clump, is also in bloom. Two plants of Cirrhopetalum robustum are
flowering freely, one being a fine specimen bearing ten flower scapes.
Saccolabium fragrans is a charming little Burmese Orchid, with the leaves
about an inch in length, and three short spikes of purple flowers. Another
little gem to be seen in flower is Hemipilia calophylla, the single ovate leaf
being prettily marked with brown. It bears eight dark red velvety flowers
on an erect spike. This plant thrives in the cool Intermediate house.
Some adventitious growths on the flower spike of an Oncidium attract
attention in the Cool house. They are growing in clusters of four and five
at each node, and rooting freely, so that the species could easily be pro-
pagated by cutting them off and placing them in small pots of compost,
like seedlings. .

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

FLowers of two very diverse seedlings of Lelia Latona (L. cinnabarina X
purpurata) are sent from the collection of H. R. Sterrett, Esq., Heston-
Hounslow. One has rich cinnabar orange sepals and petals, and much
purple veining in the throat of the lip, with a zone of the same colour
beyond, while in the other the lip is almost entirely purple, and the sepals
and petals are partially suffused with the same colour. A nice light form
of Leliocattleya Ballii is also sent. They are seedlings flowering for the
first time, and have not yet reached their full development.

A three-flowered inflorescence of the striking Odontonia brugensis. is
sent by M. Firmin Lambeau, Brussels. The flowers are 24 inches in
diameter, lilac in colour, with a dark violet-purple blotch at the base of the
sepals and petals, and the lip an inch broad, with a violet-purple zone
round the bronzy yellow disc of the lip. The flowers are most like the

Miltonia parent in shape.

232 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [JULY, 1913-

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
THE great Summer Show of the R.H.S. will be held at Holland House,
Kensington, on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, July 1st, 2nd, and
3rd. Particulars were given last month.

Two ordinary meetings of the Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, on July 15th and zoth, ©
when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour, 12 o’clock noon.

The next meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid
Society will be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on July 3rd. The
Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to the eSpeeog of
members and the public from 1 to 4 o’clock p.m.

Mirrowiovk CooPERI.—A distinct and interesting hybrid raised ee
Messrs. Sander & Sons, Bruges, from Cochlioda Neetzliana ? x Miltonia
Warscewiczii $. The flowers are most like the Miltonia parent in general
shape, but crimson red in colour, with a shining patch on the lip, which is
derived from the Miltonia parent. It should develop into a striking thing
when the seedling becomes strong.

———+>0<-__
ORCHID PORTRAITS.

CaTTLEYA Dowiana.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 889, with fig.

CaTTLEYA HarRISONIZ.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 855, with fig.

DENDROBIUM SCHUETZII, Rolfe.—Bot. Mag., t. 8495.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA VIRGINALE (specimen plant). —Journ. Hort., 1913;
i. p. 513, with fig.

ODONTOGLOSSUM AIREWORTH ORCHID DENE VAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913,
p- 411, with fig.

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM THE BARONESS.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 451,
with fig.

ODONTOGLOsSSUM GEORGIUS REX.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 396, with fig.

OponToGLossuM LAMBEAUIANUM.—Journ. Hort., 1913, i. p. 556, with fig.

ONCIDIUM SPHACELATUM.—Horticulture, 1913, p- 780, with fig.

_————>?>0<e————
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

[Orchids are named and questions answered —. Sh a ar as possible. ps st are
requested to — the venink counéry or A ints é of plan An ADDRESSED postcar be
sent tf a reply by post is opened aba ; (fe postcards thbale be used). Subjects y f special
interest will be dealt with in the body of t) Rk).

B.L.—1, Lelia cane: 2 seul ssbitintoacinescn (not Oncidium) ; ; 3, Dendro-
a moschatum.

A.O.--The flower appears to be Trichopilia Backhouseana, not T. suavis alba.
-W.—Received with thanks. Note deferred. h
ae Trustees of the British Museum. pawl with —s Catalogue of Plants of Sout

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

VoL. XXI.] AUGUST, 1913. (No. 248.

- OUR NOTE BOOK.
THREE big Shows have followed each other in rapid succession, and the
circumstance affords some interesting matter for comparison. The Ghent
Show is a little too early for Orchids, but the period cannot be altered,
being fixed by the flowering season of the Azaleas for which Ghent is so
famous. But the Orchids were none the less magnificent, though the
display as a whole was somewhat marred by the fact that it was broken up
between six large rooms, three of which were upstairs, and these at times
were inconveniently crowded. Of course Orchids cannot be staged in an
unheated tent in April, and the alternative was the only practicable one
under the circumstance. Hybrids on this occasion were more to the front
than ever, and in Belgium, as in England, great advances have been made
during the last five years, a fact particularly noticeable in Odontioda,
Cymbidium, and Odontoglossum, which were present in great force. The
excellence of the display was recognised on all hands, and the magnificent
group staged by M. Firmin Lambeau, which was awarded the King’s prize,
will long be remembered. The exhibits of M. Jules Hye de Crom, M. Ch.
Dietrich, Count Joseph de Hemptinne, M. Ch. Vuylsteke, MM. Th. Pauwels
& Cie., and Messrs. Stuart Low & Co. were excellent, while that staged.
by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. was remarkable for its richness and
thoroughly representative character. The Show on this occasion was held
on a new site, in connection with the International Exhibition, and we may
congratulate the Society and its officials on its success.

The Chelsea Show was brilliant in every respect, and reminiscent of the
old Temple Show at its best, without the accompanying disadvantage of
overcrowding, which was inevitable in so restricted a space. The Orchids
- were scarcely so numerous as at the Royal International Exhibition held
on the same spot a year ago, but there was no falling off as regards quality,
and there was the usual evidence of progress among hybrids; in fact, all
the eight Orchids which obtained First-class Certificates were of hybrid
Origin, and all but one of the fourteen to which Awards of Merit were given.
It is difficult to convey an idea of so much brilliance in a few words, but a

234 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AuGuST, 1913.

writer in the daily press made a fairly successful attempt when he described
the Show as “ Fairyland, S.W.,’’ and remarked that ‘‘ the amazing Orchids
make one long for a new colour language to describe the vagueness of reds
that are almost browns, of crimsons that look as if they must have faded
in fairyland, and of shadowy smoke-like blossoms.’’ Another writer
plunged into somewhat mythical finance, and spoke of ‘‘ two Orchids valued
at £10,000,” which were described as ‘‘ the patriotic Orchids the Georgius
Rex and the Empress of India.”’

The Summer Show held at Holland House produced a fine display of
Orchids, though not equal to that of the earlier event, and less disimilar in
composition than might have been expected, though the two meetings were
only separated by the short interval of six weeks. The view has indeed
been expressed that this additional Show is unnecessary so far as Orchids
are concerned. But it must be remembered that this Show is primarily
intended for things which are not yet in perfection when the Spring Show
is held, and as Orchids are curiously independent of season, and their
presence is always welcomed, we may be content with things as they are.
If they persist in flowering at this season they must inevitably gravitate to
such exhibitions, where they are seen and admired by thousands of
visitors. And, after all, have we not the fortnightly meetings of the
R.H.S., and never a blank so far as Orchids are concerned !

And now we return for a moment to the perennial subject of Nomen-
clature, and a cutting from the Field, which has been obligingly forwarded
by a correspondent. ‘‘ Simplex” is ‘‘ assured that even so moderate a title
as Renanthera linschootiana, bestowed on an Orchid, is proving somewhat
of a bar to its popularity as a garden plant.” Perhaps he did not quite
intend this, and if not he must have it out with the printer; but we think
that if he had visited the big shows at Ghent, Chelsea, and Holland House
before penning the said remark it would never have troubled the
_ <ompositor of the Field, for we doubt if, taken collectively, any single
species was exhibited in such numbers as the brilliant Renanthera which
was named after M. Van Imschoot. What might not have happened if it
had been named, let us say, Renanthera simplex? Our critic, however, iS
good enough to say that ‘“‘if any persons are to be commemorated by their
names being bestowed, it would, of course, be insular and unfair that any
should be barred.” He also believes that “arguments can be put forward
against every known system of plant nomenclature,” so perhaps the only
remedy is to have no names at all.

One other matter must close our notes for the present month. In

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 235

recording the new “Odontioda Brindejonc des Moulinais” the Gardeners’
Chronicle remarks: *‘ The name might better be restricted to one of the three
words used or some other name of a single word given.” We thoroughly.
agree, though we say it in fear and trembling, for did we not once take a
similar hint too seriously and act upon it ? though with results that were a
little disconcerting. But the line must be drawn somewhere, and perhaps
the writer felt that things had now reached the limit, and it was time to
speak out. The incident is instructive, and should be read in connection
with the ‘‘ Echoes of a recent discussion” in our January issue (pp. 21-24).
We shall probably reach an agreement yet.

ORCHIPLATANTHERA CHEVALLIERIANA.

SIXTEEN years ago this interesting hybrid between Orchis maculata and
Platanthera bifolia was recorded as British (O.R., v. p. 234), it having been
found by Mr. Arthur Reid, on a large moor near Perth, among a profuse
growth of the two parent species. Its history was then given in detail. It
has now been tound in a hay-field, close to the edge of a copse, about two
miles from Shepton Mallett, Somerset. The finder was Harry Stacy, a
small boy, who recognised it as something unfamiliar to him, and gave it
to Miss Baggallay, Elm Farm, Pilton, by whom it was sent to Kew as
probably a hybrid between Platanthera bifolia and Orchis maculata, which
are said to grow in the same field. It shows an unmistakable combination
of the characters of these two species, the flowers being white and
unspotted, but with two ample rounded side lobes to the lip, an elongated
front lobe, and the spur nearly as short as in O. maculata, which it also
approaches in the shape of the spike. It has very similar characters to the
one previously mentioned, but is very different in colour from that figured
by Camus (Monogr. Orch. Eur., p. 352, t. 23, fig. 743-745), which has lilac-
coloured flowers, and a shorter front lobe to the lip, and thus more
resembles the Orchis parent. It is an interesting discovery, and might
€ncourage further search where the two species grow together R.A.R,

HEXADESMIA MICRANTHA.— An Orchid sent to Kew last year from Cachi,
Costa Rica, by Mr. E. Lankester, has just flowered, and proves to be
Hexadesmia micrantha, a species which originally flowered with Messrs.
Loddiges, of Hackney, in 1884, when it was described by Lindley (Bot. Reg.,
XXx., Misc. p. z). This plant is said to have been received from Guatemala.
It is a small species, having short fusiform pseudobulbs, terminated by a pair
of linear leaves some 2 or 2} inches long, and racemes of about the same
length, with minute whitish flowers, and the disc of the somewhat three-
lobed lip green. The genus is closely allied to Scaphyglottis, chiefly
differing in having six instead of four pollinia. R.A.R,

236 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AUGUST, 1913.

ORCHIDS AT MEIRELBEKE.

THE Ghent week afforded an opportunity of renewing an acquaintance with
the fine Orchid establishment of M. Th. Pauwels & Cie., Meirelbeke, of
which an account has ‘already been given (O.R., xvi. pp. 161-163). During
the intervening five years great progress has been made in hybridising, and
a number of new houses have been built, in which the latest improvements
have been incorporated. We found many interesting features to note,
though, as usual on such occasions, most of the choicer things in bloom
were away at the big show.

The older houses were first visited, and these extend from a corridor
seventy metres long, which is largely devoted to a batch of the handsome
Cymbidium Pauwelsii (Lowianum concolor x insigne), a few of which
were flowering. Passing into the first Odontoglossum house we found both
established plants and seedlings in all stages, many of the former being in
spike, and a few O. crispum and hybrids in bloom. The seedlings were very
interesting. The seeds are sown on the compost of established plants, and
after germinating are pricked off when large enough to handle, and potted
on as necessary. Those in tiny pots are plunged into pans of fibre to keep
them moist. The seedlings include many promising crosses, and all are in
thriving condition.

Two other Cool houses followed, in which we noticed a few Odonto-
glossum Pescatorei and many O. crispum in bloom, and it was interesting
to see both O. Andersonianum and O. Adrianz out of the same importation
of O. crispum. The latter were mostly typical unspotted forms, to the
extent, it was estimated, of about ninety-five per cent. A number of
Odontoglossums were bearing seed pods, and among them a very purple
form of O. percultum which was also in bloom. We noted two Odontioda
Charlesworthii in bloom, with Masdevallia Pourbaixii and M. coccinea,
while a few Oncidium concolor were in spike.

“The next was a Warm house, largely devoted to the fragrant Cattleya
Schroeder, among which we noted a good C. S. alba with three flowers,
and here was a batch of Dendrobium Pierardii, a few being in bloom, and
some small seedlings of Miltonia Roezlii x Odontoglossum amabile, which
should be interesting. Several succeeding houses were devoted to Cattleyas
and allies, including numerous promising hybrids, and fine batches of the
leading species. Here was pointed out a distinct white Cattleya with
orange throat that appeared among C. Mossiz, and which we suspect comes
under C. Mossize Wageneri. A few C. Mendelii and C. Lawrenceana
were in bloom, also a seedling between the latter and Lzlia tenebrosa. A
lot of Cattleyas were bearing capsules of hybrid seed, and were collected
together for convenience of treatment. We noticed also a good Cymbidium

8 pial sas

AuGust, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 237

Lowianum concolor and Dendrobium fimbriatum oculatum in bloom, and
Aérides Houlletianum in spike, while among a lot of Cypripediums was C.
Alma Gervaet (C. Lawrenceanum Hyeanum xX Maudiz), which retains the
albinism of its parents. Then came a house of Brassocattleyas and Brasso-
lzlias, in great variety, and the robust health of the plants, like that of the
collection generally, shows how well the cultural details are looked after.
Osmunda fibre and sphagnum moss are used as compost.

We now come to the block of new houses, each thirty metres long, in
which the latest improvements have been incorporated, and found every-
thing in thriving condition. The Phalenopsis house contained a fine
batch of healthy plants, of which a few P. Schillerianum were in bloom,
while a lot of P. amabilis were in one of the Cattleya houses, together with
extensive batches of C. Lawrenceana and Vanda ccerulea. Here also
were pointed out a number of Annamese Orchids, including the pretty
Cirrhopetalum miniatum, and we noticed plants of Eulophiella Hamelinii
and Grammangis Ellisii, while two plants of Saccolabium giganteum were
in bloom. Other botanical species were noticed here and there in the
collection, though mostly not in bloom.

Another house contained a fine batch of Dendrobium Phalznopsis on
one side and Oncidium splendidum on the other. Some of the latter have
been in the collection for seven years, and were in excellent health. They
are grown in osmunda fibre and kept rather dry. Here were also a few
plants of Dendrobium Wardianum.

Cattleyas are imported largely, and a house was devuied to C. labiata
and C. Trianz, the latter having overflowed into the next house in
quantity, where also we noted a batch of Miltonia vexillaria. Another
house was largely devoted to recently imported plants, which were lying
under sheets of paper on the stages to enable them to plump up again.
Then came a house containing a fine batch of Odontoglossum grande and
Cypripediums, a few of the latter being in flower.

The seedling house came last, and proved particularly interesting. A
number of large square cases with glass tops are used, and into these is put
a bed of cocoanut fibre as moisture-retaining material. The seeds are sown
on canvas, stretched over sphagnum moss and then placed in pots, and
here they germinate with the greatest freedom, in some cases almost
covering the canvas with tiny green globules. In each case is put one or
two plants of Pinguicula caudata, as ‘“‘fly-catchers,” for the fly which
attacks germinating seedlings is as troublesome here as elsewhere. The
house is kept warm and moist, and as uniform in temperature as possible ;
the thermometer, we noted, registered the equivalent of 88° Fahr. There
were thousands of seedlings in every stage, but we cannot attempt to
enumerate the crosses. We noted, however, some seedlings of Cattleya

238 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AUGUST, 1913.

Dowiana aurea that have been obtained to increase the stock of this choice
Cattleya. The seedlings are grown here until they reach a considerable
size, and are then moved on to the other houses as room is required.

Want of space prevents a fuller account of this flourishing establish-
ment, and we must congratulate M. Pauwels and his assistants on their
success. The situation is low, but the air and light are good, and there are
no fogs in the winter to contend with. The houses are well designed, and
the arrangements for ventilation and shading perfect. Under such
conditions, and with the enterprise and attention to detail that is every-
where apparent, one can understand the excellent condition of the collection
and the substantial progress that is being made.

Egnane Weert ee

ORCHIDS AT LOOCHRISTI.

THE name of M. Ch. Vuylsteke is a household word among lovers
of Odontoglossums, and the famous establishment at Loochristi was
naturally one of the attractions during the Ghent week. On calling there
we found that another great development has taken place, M. Vuylsteke
having erected two large blocks of houses on the Belgian system, each
comprising what may be described as six houses in one, the intervening
divisions being absent, and the ridge and furrow roof being supported on
piers, so as to give free circulation of air between the different divisions, an
arrangement which is quite practicable when all the divisions are to be
treated alike, as in the case of Odontoglossums and Odontiodas, which
have long been M. Vuylsteke’s speciality.

An enormous number of plants were in flower or spike in the different
houses, the majority of the Odontoglossums being blotched hybrids in
endless variety, for blotching seems to be quite a dominant character. The
amount of variation among seedlings out of the same batch is remarkable,
though unfortunately the parentage is not known in a good many cases.
The experiments were begun many years ago with a number of good forms,
and the best of the resulting seedlings have again been intercrossed,
probably .with certain additions from outside, but the well-known
polymorphism of secondary hybrids defies all efforts to trace their origin
subsequently unless the batches have been carefully isolated. One such
case was seen in O. crispum Luciani X Wiganianum, where the variation
was remarkable. There were both white and yellow grounds, with
blotching of the most diverse kind. One was a white of good shape, with
chocolate blotches and the disc of the lip bright yellow. A second had
quite different blotches of similar colour and rather poor shape. A third
had a yellow ground with red-brown blotches, and our notes proceed, one
was much like O. loochristiense, another near O. Wilckeanum, while the
next would pass for a blotched O. crispum. But this condition of things

Avoust, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 239

seems almost universal among secondary hybrids, and has been frequently
recorded in our pages.

O. Aiglon is an enormous flower, measuring 44 inches from tip to tip of
the petals, and 42 inches in the other direction. It is the largest form that
has been raised at Loochristi, and has a rosy ground, with a zone of large
red-brown blotches on the sepals and petals, and a large blotch in front of
the yellow disc of the lip. One Odontoglossum was noticed in which the
blotching was heavy and of an almost bluish purple shade, and this was-
said to be one parent of O. gandavense.

Examples of most of the older well-known hybrids were in bloom, with
swarms of seedlings, some flowering for the first time, and showing the
usual variation in the shape, arrangement, and colour of the blotches, and
in the ground colour, which is white, rosy, or occasionally light yellow.
They made a fine display, and we may add that large quantities are grown
for cut blooms for market.

The Odontiodas made a brilliant display, and showed an equally
bewildering amount of variation. The remarkable form called O. Blushing
Bride, from which every trace of scarlet had vanished, was noted at page
190, and here were pointed out nine others from the same batch—Odonto-
glossum Pescatorei 2 X Odontioda Vuylstekez ¢ —including a white form
blotched all over with red, a rosy form with a red zone near the base, a-
yellow with a similar zone of colour, a yellow with pale brown markings,
and others with more of the scarlet colour. Here also was a plant of O-
Vuylstekeze bearing two fine panicles, and another with one of seventeen
branches. M. Vuylsteke remarked that he once had a panicle bearing as
many as 266 flowers, which must have been a fine sight. O. Bradshawiz
showed much variation, and one had a distinct yellow zone round the red
blotches. Two other very diverse seedlings from the same capsule were’
pointed out, the plants being in flower for the first time. O. Chantecleer
is a remarkable reversion, the flower being wholly scarlet and convex in
shape, like the Cochlioda parent, but considerably larger. A great amount
of reversion may be anticipated as time goes on.

A large number of capsules were noticed, showing that hybridising is
being carried on with energy, and this brings us to the younger seedlings,
which are grown separately, and are both exceedingly numerous and in
thriving condition. The one and two-year old plants were in separate
houses, and the little seedlings, both Odontiodas and Odontoglossums, were
pictures of health and vigour. Their flowering will be awaited with much
interest.

M. Vuylsteke also showed us a house of Miltonias, containing a number
of seedlings in excellent condition, and from some promising crosses, which.
we shall hope to hear of later. Some good M. vexillaria were in bloom.

240 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AuGUST, 1913.

Lastly we went into a house of Cypripediums and other things, and
noted a good Maxillaria Sanderiana in bloom. But time was pressing, and
we could not note a tithe of the interesting things seen. The quality of the
plants, however, is well-known, and we must congratulate M. Vuylsteke and
his son, who has long been in the business, on the excellent condition of
the plants and the establishment generally.

OBITUARY.

Jutius RorEurs.—By the death of Mr. Julius Roehrs, horticulture in
America has lost one of its most enthusiastic pioneers in the development
-of the wholesale and retail seed business. Mr. Roehrs had been ill all the
‘winter with a bad cough, and the doctors advised him to go to Capri.
‘There he stayed three months, but, not getting better, he returned to New
York from Naples on June 28th, and arrived home on the 8th of July, and
died on the 2oth inst., in his seventy-third year. Born in Germany, where
he received his early training, Mr. Roehrs, whilst still a young man, emigrated
to the United States, entering private service in Jersey City, New Jersey,
where he cultivated most successfully Orchids, stove and greenhouse plants,
including some of the finest specimens of Phalznopsis Schilleriana and P.
amabilis. The collection was eventually dispersed owing to the death of
the owner, and Mr. Roehrs shortly afterwards commenced business on his
own account at Rutherford, New Jersey. His energetic, vigorous
constitution, amiable disposition, and strict business qualities enabled him
to create an establishment unequalled in America. His keen judgment of
plant novelties prompted him to devote whole houses to particular kinds,
and he visited Europe almost every year in quest of them. Twenty-five
years ago he commenced to cultivate Orchids, which were at that time
almost unattainable in New York flower shops. He began by suspending
and growing them from the roofs of his Palm houses. Gradually the
demand developed to such proportions that his nursery now contains many
Orchid houses of great size and modern construction, and _ includes
thousands of specimens of Cattleya gigas, C. Mossie, C. Mendelii, C.
Trianz, C. labiata, Oncidium varicosum, O. splendidum, Dendrobium
formosum, and D. Phalznopsis, thousands of Vanda coerulea, and many
other useful varieties of Orchids, together with a collection of rare species
and hybrids. His Palm and decorative plant business is also one of the
largest in the country, especially in plants for use at Christmas and Easter-
He leaves a widow, two daughters, and five sons. Three of the latter are
in the business. Each has received a thorough horticultural training in this
country, which, together with their home experience, should enable them to
maintain and continue the excellent reputation of the “* Roehrs Establish-
ment.” —Gardener’s Chronicle.

AvucusT, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 24t

CYPRIPEDIUM VIKING.
THE annexed figure represents the handsome Cypripedium Viking (C.
Buchanianum X illustre) which was exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L.
Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. H. G. Alexander), at the R.H.S
meeting held on December 3rd last, and received an Award of Merit. The
photograph has been kindly sent by the exhibitor.. An analysis of the
parentage allows its characters to be understood. C. Buchanianum was
derived from C. Druryi x Spicerianum, and C. illustre from C. Latham-

ig. 40. CYPRIPEDIUM VIKING.

ianum (Spicerianum x villosum) X nitens (insigne X villosum). Thus
four species are represented in the ancestry, of which C. Spicerianum comes
in through both parents, and its influence is seen in the broad white dorsal
sepal, while the very broad purple band shows the combined influence of
.. Spicerianum, Druryl, and villosum. The short broad petals recall C.
Buchanianum, and the yellow colour suffused and marked with brown show
the influence of both C. Druryi and C. villosum. It is a very promising

hybrid, and should develop into a fine thing.

242 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AUGUST, 1913-

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.

THIS.month every care must be given to keeping the temperature as near
to 65° Fahr. as possible, and this can only be achieved by judicious
damping, ventilating, and by lowering the blinds often as early as 9.30
a.m., and keeping them down until well after five in the afternoon. Look
over all the plants daily, and to all that need it give a thorough soaking.
Personally I prefer giving water at this time of the year in the evening,
being content to rely on damping in the morning to afford the necessary
moisture. :

This is essentially the growing season, and not much is in flower in the
Cool house, which, perhaps, is fortunate, as Odontoglossums, especially if
in bloom during this month, never possess the long lasting qualities which
are such a pleasing feature with the winter and early spring blooming
species and hybrids.

Should the permanent shading of flour and water, which was applied
to the roof glass in May, be showing any signs of wearing off, it will be
found advisable to apply another coating, and all danger of plants being
scorched by the sun will be removed. This liquid shading is indispensable
to a Cool Orchid house, for whilst preventing the sun from entering the
house it does not exclude any light, whereas excessive use of the roller
blind tends to create too gloomy surroundings, and causes the plants to
become weak and spindly. Watch carefully for all manner of insect pests,
thrips and slugs being the most troublesome at this season.

Odontoglossum grande is now becoming well advanced in completing its
new growths, and a little shade from eleven till three o’clock will probably
be needed. A brown scale often attacks this species on the underside o
the leaves. This must be looked for at frequent intervals. It comes away
readily if gently scraped with a sharp knife, and should be immediately burnt.

Although at present somewhat prohibitive in price, some of the earlier-
raised Odontiodas afford a magnificent display in a Cool house, and when
one realises that it is only a few years since the first one made its
appearance, it is astounding the number of primary and secondary hybrids
which are now in cultivation. Fora selection of the best and cheapest I
would recommend O. Bohnhofiz, Bradshawiz, Cooksoniz, ignea, loochrist-
iensis, rosefeldiensis, Thwaitesiz, and Vuylstekez. These require very
similar cultivation to the Odontoglossum hybrids, with,’ perhaps, a trifle
warmer temperature in the winter. Keep them slightly drier at the roots
for a few weeks after flowering, but it should be remembered that these,
and, in fact, all hybrid Orchids, do not need and do not take advantage of
such a period of rest as is enjoyed by the species.

AUGUST, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 243

THE HOLLAND HOUSE SHOW.

THE Summer Show of the Royal Horticultural Society was held at Holland
House, Kensington, on July rst, 2nd, and 3rd, in delightful weather, and.
produced a magnificent display and a very large attendance of visitors.
The Orchids were excellent, both in quality and arrangement, and the
superb group staged by Messrs. Sander & Sons was awarded the Coronation
Cup for the best exhibit in the Show. Two Gold and four other medals,
three Cups, three First-class Certificates, four Awards of Merit, and two
Cultural Commendations were also awarded. Two or three weil-knowm
exhibitors were unrepresented on account of the rival claims of the Bristol
Show, which is reported on another page. . The Committee, Judges, and
Officials were, as usual, entertained by the Council to luncheon, at which
the new President, Field Marshal the Rt. Hon. Lord Grenfell, presided.

Orchid Committee present: Sir Harry J. Veitch (in the Chair), and
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), W. Bolton, Gurney Wilson, A. Dye, S-
W. Flory, R. G. Thwaites, W. H. White, W. P. Bound, Walter Cobb, A.
McBean, Stuart Low, J. Wilson Potter, W. H. Hatcher, H. G. Alexander,
R. Brooman White, R. A. Rolfe, W. Waters Butler, G. F. Moore, F.
Sander, J. Charlesworth, C. J. Lucas, J. S. Moss, F. Peeters, and Sir
Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

The Orchid Judges were: H. J. Chapman, de Barri Crawshay, and J.
E. Shill.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., V.M.H., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr.
Collier), staged a very fine and effectively-arranged group, to which a Large:
Silver Cup was awarded. It contained a charming series of Leliocattleya
Canhamiana, L.-c. Hippolyta var. Phcebe, various Cattleyas, good.
examples of Phalznopsis amabilis Rimestadiana, the brilliant Renanthera
Imschootiana, Epidendrum Boundii, a fine Odontoglossum Lady Roxburgh
with four spikes, O. Thompsonianum, O. tripudians, the pretty yellow
Sobralia Colmaniz, and a pale pink form of the same, some excellent.
Odontioda Bradshawie, Cupid, and Vuylstekez, some well-flowered
Miltonia vexillaria and the white var. Lambeauiana, Oncidium Papilio and
macranthum, Catasetum Cliftonii, Lissochilus speciosus, Brassia bidens,.
Dendrobium Victoria-Regina, D. Alpha, Cirrhopetalum robustum and.
picturatum, Bulbophyllum tremulum and barbigerum, Masdevallia
calura, Eria pannea, Physosiphon Loddigesii, Pleurothallis stenopetala,.
Epidendrum prismatocarpum with five spikes, Lzlia tenebrosa, good
examples of Cypripedium callosum Sander, and other interesting things.

W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield, Edgbaston, sent a richly-coloured.
form of Cattleya Warscewiczii, and C. Clymere, a charming hybrid between.
the preceding and C. Rex, bearing five flowers.

2.44 THE. ORCHID REVIEW. [AUGUST, 1913

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent
the fine Odontoglossum triumphans Lionel Crawshay, O. Boadicea, a broad-
petalled hybrid from the latter crossed with O. armainvillierense, and O.
‘Vesta (bellatulum xX percultum).

J. Gurney Fowler, Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis), sent
two fine examples of Odontioda Lambeauiana Fowler’s var.

M. Jules Hye de Crom, Ghent (gr. M. Coen), sent Miltonia vexillaria
gigantea, a very large deep rose form, M. Hyeana ardentissima, a large
white flower with a dark crimson mask on the lip, and M. H. gracilis, a
charming white form with a rosy flush on the petals and lip.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a magnificent group, which
gained a Gold Medal and the Coronation Cup for the finest exhibit in the
Show. The centre was made up of the graceful Phalznopsis amabilis
Rimestadiana with about forty sprays, and on either side were numerous
white and coloured forms of Cattleya Mossia. At the two ends were
masses of the brilliant C. Warscewiczii Sanderiana, while Lzliocattleyas,
‘Odontoglossums, and Odontiodas, Miltonia vexillaria, Bleuana, and other
fine things made up a group of remarkable brilliance. Among interesting
‘things noted were examples of Odontonia Lelia Sander, St. Alban, and
Magali Sander (M. Warscewiczii X O. armainvillierense), the latter with
‘purplish red sepals and petals, and a blush white lip with some reddish
markings, the interesting Miltonioda Cooperi (described at page 232),
having a slender branched spike of brick-red flowers with lighter apex to the
lip, Odontoglossum tigrinum, gandavense, Uroskinneri album, and others,
Vanda Parishii, Brassia verrucosa, Cirrhopetalum robustum, Saccolabium
curviifolium, Odontioda keighleyensis and St. Fuscien, Ornithocephalus
grandiflorus, Nanodes Meduse, Masdevallia Courtauldiana, the striking
Stauropsis lissochiloides, Peristylis goodyeroides, Cypripedium Sladdenii,
Platanthera iantha, Acineta chrysantha, Dendrobium regium, Eulophia
nuda, and many other interesting things.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, received a Gold Medal
‘for a brilliant group, arranged in undulating lines, and containing a fine
series of hybrids and the showy species of the season. We noted the hand-
some Miltonia Charlesworthii, with rose-pink flowers and a crimson. mask
to the lip, the pure white M. vexillaria La Niege, and other choice forms,
‘Odontoglossum Doris magnificum, O. percultum, O. Olympia, O. President
Poincaré, finely blotched with purple, O. Williamsianum, O. crispum
‘xanthotes Yellow bird, with deep yellow blotches on the sepals and lip,
Vanda parviflora, Odontioda Charlesworthii, Lambeauiana, Vuylstekee,
Chantecleer, and others, Peristeria elata, a fine series of Phalaenopsis
-amabilis Rimestadiana, a fine example of Oncidioda Charlesworthii, O.
Bella (C. Neetzliana x O. Marshallianum), with flowers closely resembling

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 245:

the Oncidium parent, Cymbidium tigrinum, the purple Oncidium Claesii,
Aéranthes grandiflorus, a nice lot of Epidendrum vitellinum, Schomburgkia
tibicinis, Dendrobium Phalenopsis, Lzliocattleya Gottoiana The President,
a noble sp2cimen, fine forms of L.-c. Canhamiana, Aphrodite, Ulysses, and
others, Cattleya Mossiz and var. Reineckeana, Disa Luna, and others.
Messrs. Mansell & Hatcher, Rawdon, Yorks, received a Silver Cup for
a large and very artistically arranged group, in which Phalenopsis amabilis.
Rimestadiana and Renanthera Imschootiana were very effectively combined,
with banks of Cattleya Mossiz, Mendelii, and Warscewiczii, Leliocattleyas,
and Odontoglossums, while in front were Miltonia vexillaria, Trichopilia
Backhouseana and other dwarf things. We noted good examples of
Cochlioda Neetzliana, Oncidium Gardneri, pumilum and unicorne, Lycaste
aromatica, Disa grandiflora, Dendrochilum filiforme, Promenz xanthina,.
crowded with flowers, Odontioda Bradshawie, Lambeauiana, Cupid and
Thwaitesii, the striking Bulbophyllum Binnendijkii, Brassia caudata,.
Miltonia vexillaria Queen Alexandra, the variable Leliocattleya Cowanii,
Odontoglossum crispum Wilckeanum, and others too numerous to mention.
Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, received a Standard Cup
for a very fine group, including a number of Phalznopsis amabilis.
Rimestadiana, Dendrobium pulchellum, Dearei, and Falconeri, Vanda
teres and Charlesworthii, Chysis bractescens, Cirrhopetalum robustum,
Brassavola Digbyana, Stanhopea tigrina, Oncidium unicorne and sarcodes,
Calanthe veratrifolia, Masdevallia muscosa, the fine Cattleya Dupreana
(Warscewiczii X Warneri), some good C. Mossiz and Mendelii, Lelio-
cattleya Aphrodite, Ccelogyne Massangeana and pandurata, Acineta
Humboldtii, Renanthera Imschootiana, Odontioda Thwaitesii and
Vuylstekez, some good Cypripedium niveum, and other interesting things,
Mr. S. Flory, Orchid Nursery, Twickenham, received a Silver-gilt Flora
Medal for a very fine group, containing Cattleya Mossize Wageneri, and a
form with variegated petals, C. Gaskelliana alba, Brassavola Digbyana,
Lelia purpurata, with richly-coloured lip and petals, Lzliocattleya bletch-:
leyensis King George, L.-c. Rubens, and others, a number of Ancectochilus-
regalis, setaceus, and intermedius, Macodes Petola, Odontoglossum
armainvillierense xanthotes, O. Wilckeanum, O. Rossii X spectabile, &c.
Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, received a Silver Flora Medal
for a showy group, including some good examples of Leliocattleya
Canhamiana and Aphrodite, distinct forms of Lelia Latona xX L.-c.
Dominiana, Disa Luna and grandiflora, the latter raised from seed,
Cattleya Harrisoniana, Vanda tricolor, Epidendrum prismatocarpum,
Odontioda Bradshawize, Odontoglossum Jasper, armainvillierense, Solon,
illustrissimum, some good O. crispum, and others.
Mr. H. Dixon, Spencer Park Nursery, Wandsworth Common, received '

246 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AucusT, 1913.

a Silver Flora Medal for a fine group, including Cypripediums, Oncidium
flexuosum and ampliatum, Odontoglossum Pescatorei, a few good
‘Odontiodas, Cattleya Mossiz Wageneri, and others.

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, received a Silver
Banksian Medal for a small lot of choice things, including Cattleya
Mendelii Lambeauiana, a pretty white form with a bluish front to the lip,
‘C. Parthenia, C. Mossiz Wageneri, Nanodes Meduse, Bulbophyllum
Lobbii and barbigerum, Leliocattleya Aphrodite, Epidendrum virens,
Cypripedium Lawrenceanum Hyeanum, C. callosum Sanderz, C. Rossetti
‘Westonbirt var., and C. Goweri magnificum.

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, sent two forms of Cattleya Mendelii, and
‘C. Warscewiczii Mandaiana, a light pink form with some yellow veining in
the throat, suggestive of C. Hardyana.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

MILTONIA SANDER& (M. St. Andre X vexillaria memoria G. D. Owen).
—A charming hybrid, having blush white flowers, with a blackish crimson
mask to the lip and a few short radiating lines. Exhibited by Messrs.
Sander & Sons (see figure on page 256).

MILTONIODA Harwoopit Fow.er’s var. (C. Neetzliana X M. vexillaria).
—A very fine form, with bright cerise flowers and the crest of the lip yellow.
Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

OponTiopa Brew (Charlesworthii x Odontoglossum Harryanum).—A
temarkable hybrid, having deep brownish red sepals and petals, and a
broad lip with some orange splashes and a 7-lobed yellow crest. Exhibited
‘by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CaTTLEYA Mossi# VAR. DREADNOUGHT.—A remarkably fine form,
having rose-pink sepals and petals, and a rich crimson lip veined with
orange on the disc. Exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Sons.

CATTLEYA Mossia VAR. OLyMPIA.-—A charming blush white form, with
tose-purple veining on the front of the lip, and orange in the throat.
Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. ee

CATTLEYA SERENATA (Whitei X Mossiz).—A fine hybrid, with rose-
coloured sepals and petals, and a darker lip with some yellow in the throat.
Exhibited by Messrs. Mansell & Hatcher.

OpDonTIopA WILsontI THE PRESIDENT (C. vulcanica x O. Pescatorei).
—A large and handsome form, having white flowers well blotched with
claret-colour. Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

GRaMMANGIS ELtisir.—To Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., for fine
examples of this striking Madagascar species, one of which bore two spikes
and an aggregate of sixty-four flowers.

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 247

ODONTIODA BRADSHAWI#.—To Mr. J. Collier, gardener to Sir Jeremiah
Colman, Bart., for a very fine specimen, bearing two immense panicles of
scarlet flowers.

ORCHIDS OF SOUTH NIGERIA.
WE have received from the Trustees of the British Museum a copy of the
Catalogue of the Plants collected by Mr. and Mrs. P. A. Talbot in the Oban
district of South Nigeria, by Dr. A. B. Rendle, M.A., and others, with a
short account of the district and the general character of the vegetation by
Mr. Talbot. The Oban district lies within the bend of the Cross River, at
a distance of 40 to 100 miles from the Gulf of Guinea, and is bounded on
the east by the German Cameroons, of which it is botanically an offset. It
is very undulating, with an altitude of 300 to goo feet, and masses of hills
towards the centre forming a clearly marked watershed nearly 4000 feet
high. The annual rainfall averages 175 inches, and the great humidity
results in a very luxuriant vegetation. The forests are predominently
evergreen, though with a large proportion of deciduous trees. The number
of species in these forests is said to be immense, and the collection dealt
with contains 1016 species and varieties, including seventy Orchids, of
which twenty are described as new. Their affinity is almost exclusively
West Tropical African, and a considerable proportion occur also in the
Cameroons, with a few more widely distributed through West Tropical
Africa. The novelties comprise seven Angrecums, six Bulbophyllums,
four Polystachyas, and a single species each of Vanilla, Platylepis, and
Habenaria. Their principal characters are illustrated in a series of four
useful plates. The novelties are described separately, but the whole of the
species collected are enumerated in a systematic list at the end of the work-
A glance through this shows about twenty that we have met with in cultiva-
tion, but few of them are showy, the chief exceptions being Angreeum cauda-
tum, Eichlerianum and Chailluanum, Ansellia africana and Ancistrochilus
Thomsonsianus. There is one matter to which we must take exception,
namely the inclusion of Listrostachys and Mystacidium in Angrecum. It
is not our experience that ‘‘affinity deduced from general characters is at
variance with that deduced from the single character of the pollinia and
their appendages,” nor yet that ‘species obviously closely allied’ are
“artificially separated on this criterion.” The marked __rostellar
differences in these genera are no mere artificial characters, and we find
Saccolabium more difficult to separate from Angraecum by absolute
characters. In fact Angraecum imbricatum has been: described as a new
Saccolabium which shows that resemblances are not always affinities.
‘There is one other consideration, namely that this reversion to an old
arrangement leaves the American genera of the group with nothing to

248 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AUGUST, 1913-

stand upon, yet no American species has the typical Angraecum structure.
We may conclude by saying that the Catalogue forms an important
addition to our knowledge of Tropical African botany, and we may
congratulate Mr. and Mrs. Talbot on their excellent work when residing
in the Oban district.

BEE VISITING CYPRIPEDIUM REGINZ.

WHILST examining the flowers of the well-known hardy Cypripedium
Reginz (spectabile) in the Alpine house at Kew, a small humble-bee flew
by, returning in a few seconds and, without any hesitation, alighted upon
the front part of the pouch and immediately entered the hole in the centre.
On finding that it was trapped it made frantic efforts to return the same way,
but the infolded margin prevented it from doing so. After making the
circuit of the pouch a number of times it then crawled up to the base of
the column and struggled violently to get out by way of one of the small
openings on either side of the column. At first the hole was much too
small to allow of this, and for quite two minutes the bee was half in and
half outside the hole. All the while it was struggling to get out it set up 2
shrill noise with its wings. After a time it became exhausted, remained
quiet for a minute or so, and then recommenced its struggles. This time
it succeeded in releasing itself, and I then saw that it was covered-on the
head and back with a lot of the viscid pollen. Before it flew away it set
about vigorously clearing off the mass of pollen with its feet, leaving only a
trace of the mass which was attached to its back in the first instance.
Although I remained for some time afterwards in the vicinity of the flower
it did not return. C. P. RAFFILL.

(This affords an interesting glimpse of what takes place in a state of
nature, for Hermann Miiller has shown that the European C. Calceolus is
visited by five species of humble-bee, belonging to the genus Andrena, these
being attracted by the colour and perfume of the flowers, and by the hairs
lining the floor of the pouch, which are sometimes covered with drops of
honey. He observed the efforts of the bees to escape by the orifice through
which they entered, but, finding this impossible, they climbed up to one of
the lateral openings at the base of the pouch, thus getting smeared with
the pollen, this in turn being left upon the stigma of the next flower visited-
It appears that even here the bees do not escape without a struggle, and
those that are too large or two weak to push their way through the opening
often perish from hunger within the pouch. He had often found Andrena.
parvula and several species of flies dead within the pouch. It would be
interesting to know the bee which fertilises the flower of C. Regine in 4
wild state, or indeed any of the North American species, which form a very
interesting group.—Ep. |

Aucus?, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 249°

HYBRID ODONTOGLOSSUMS.
WE recently gave an account of the interesting collection of John S. Moss,
Esq., Wintershill Hall, Bishops Waltham (pp. III-117), in which we
alluded to the numerous blotched Odontoglossums that were being raised
there. The annexed illustration represents. a group of fifteen forms that
were in bloom together, and is reproduced from a photograph taken by Mr.
Kench, Mr. Moss’s able gardener. Though greatly reduced in size, they
give an excellent idea of the shape and markings of the flowers, and also of
their relative size, all being photographed on a single plate, post-card size,
and thus on the same scale. They were cut up and re-arranged by our-
selves, so as to bring the different kinds together. Figures 41 to 46 were

Fig. 4t—55. A Group oF Hysrip ODONTOGLOsSUMS.

(Names as in text.—The figures read from left to right.)

derived from O. illustrissimum X crispum, and show a wide range of
variation in the amount of blotching, with smaller differences in size and
shape. In fig. 46 the sepals and petals are almost suffused with dark purple
except for a very narrow white margin. Figures 47 to 50 are seedling
blotched crispums and yary considerably. The one shown in fig.. 48 is
Particularly promising, but all are good. Figures 51 and 52 are forms of
QO. Fascinator (Adriane x crispum Mossi), and 51, it will be noticed, is
Particularly charming. Fig. 53 is O. Doris (Ossulstonii x crispum), and is
a beautiful white form with a well-shaped lip, and a zone of blotches on the
sepals and petals. Fig. 54 is O. exultans (excellens x crispum Mossiz),

250 THE ORCHID REVIEW. {AuGusT, 1913.

and is a heavily blotched form of good shape. Lastly, fig. 55 is a very fine
Q. eximium (Pescatorei Charlesworthii * crispum Franz Masereel), and is—
excellent both in shape and colour. It is a very interesting series, and
affords a glimpse of the work which Mr. Moss is carrying on with such
enthusiasm and success.
NOVELTIES.

Descriptions of several additional novelties from various collections have
appeared since our last notes were given (O.R., xx. pp. 293-294), and may
now be summarised :—

PLEUROTHALLIS REPENS, Rolfe.—A Brazilian species, found in a clump
of Lelia purpurata, and flowered in the collection of Sir F. Wigan, Bart.,
Clare Lawn, East Sheen, in January, 1904. It is an ally of P. Josephensis,
Rodr., and has solitary flowers, striped with purple-red on a pale ground.—
Kew Bulletin, =g12, p. 131.

DENDROBIUM IMTHURNII, Rolfe.—Discovered by Sir Everard im Thurn,
K.C.V.O., late Governor of Fiji, near the Erakor Lagoon, Efate Island,
New Hebrides, and flowered at Kew in August, gis. It is allied to D.
antennatum, Lindl., and bears long racemes of white flowers, with purple
lines on the lip.—l.c., pp. 131, 206. (See also Bot. Mag., t. 8452).

BULBOPHYLLUM CONGESTUM, Rolfe.—Flowered in the Royal Botanical
Gardens, Glasnevin, in September, 1gro. It is a native of Burma and
Yunnan, and is allied to B. odoratissimum, Lindl., but has smaller flowers
with shorter sepals and petals and a yellow lip.—l.c., p. 131.

CIRRHOPETALUM MicHoLitzut, Rolfe. —An Annamese species, collected
by Micholitz, which flowered at Glasnevin, and with Messrs. Stuart Low &
Co., in October, 1910. It is allied to C. retiusculum, Rchb. f., and has
deep yellow lateral sepals, and dark purple lines on the petals and dorsal
sepal.—lI.c., p. 132.

POLYSTACHYA REPENS, Rolfe.—A very distinct species, with creeping
habit, which flowered in the collection of Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., at,
Burford, in November, 1911. It was sent from Uganda by E. Brown, and
has buff yellow sepals and petals striped with brown, and a deep red-brown
lip.—i.c., p. 132.

CHONDRORHYNCHA LipscomBi&, Rolfe.—An interesting Panama species
which flowered in the collection of Mrs. Lipscomb, Wimbledon, in
December, 1gt1.—l.c., p. 133. Its portrait and history were given at
page 88.

GonGora Tracyana, Rolfe.—Introduced by Mr. H. A. Tracy,
Twickenham, through his colleetor, ‘E. Kromer, and flowered in the
collection of Mr. J. S. Bergheim, Belsize Park, N.W., in March, 1911,
and shortly afterwards with the importer. It is allied to G. Scaphephorus,

ee

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 251

but fas very much smaller.flowers, with greenish yellow sepals and petals
and a white lip, all spotted with brown.—l.c., p. 133.

ANGR&CUM ANDERSONII, Rolfe.—A curious leafless species, allied to A.
cespitosum, which flowered at Glasnevin in December, Igrt. The
flowers are semipellucid white, with a broad emerald oe line on the
sepals, a green centre to the lip, and a green column.—1.c.,

PHYSURUS VALIDUS, Rolfe.—A Peruvian species, allied to at eee ee
P. roseus, which flowered in the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, in
January, r911. The flowers are small and white.—l.c., p. 134.

LIPARIS NANA, Rolfe.—A dwarf Annamese species, found on an imported
plant of Cymbidium insigne, and sent to Kew by Mr. Gurney Wilson,
Haywards Heath. It has dark purple flowers.—l.c., 1913, p. 28.

CIRRHOPETALUM MINIATUM, Rolfe.—A charming little Annamese species,
allied to C. gracillimum, and having vermilion-coloured flowers, with yellow
hairs on the margins of the petals and dorsal sepal. It was imported by
Messrs. Sander & Sons, and flowered at Glasnevin in September, 1g10.—
4.€., Pp. 29.

CALANTHE VIOLACEA, Rolfe——A Madagascar species, allied to C.
Masuca. It was imported by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., and flowered in
their Nursery in January, 1912. The flowers are light purple, with a darker
lip and a yellow crest.—l.c., p. 29.

EPIDENDRUM (Nanodes) CONGESTUM, Rolfe.—A small Costa Rican
species, which flowered at Glasnevin in January, 1911. The flowers are
pale green, with a darker lip, and the column suffused and mottled with
red-purple.—.c., p. 30.

STELIS BARBATA, Rolfe.—An ally of S. Endresii, sent from Cachi, Costa
Rica, by E. Lankester, and flowered-at Kew in November, 1912. The
flowers are ochreous green, with rather long purple hairs on the sepals,
and some red-purple on the petals and lip.—l.c., p. 141.

ERIA TRILAMELLATA, Rolfe.—A species of the Cylindrolobus group,
allied to E. truncata, and having light emerald green bracts, and white
flowers with some light brown on the lip. It was sent from Bangkok, Siam,
by C. Roebelen, and flowered at Kew in February, 1913.—/.c., p. 142.

CycnocHEs Coopert, Rolfe.—A South Peruvian species, introduced by
Messrs. Sander & Sons, through their collector Forget, which flowered and
received an Award of Merit from the R.H.S. in January last. It is allied
to C. pentadactylon, but differs in having light mahogany brown sepals and
petals, and the lobes of the lip whitish.—/.c., p. 143. (See page 261.)

ONcIDIUM BIDENTATUM, Rolfe.—Flowered in the collection of Mrs.
Lipscomb, Wilton Grove, Wimbledon, who received it from her son, Mr.
L. J. Lipscomb, when residing in Ecuador. It was found at Huigra in the

Cactus region. It is allied to O. fasciferum, Rchb. f., and has elongate

252 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Aucust, 1913.

panicles of yellow flowers with a large amount of brown on the basal half of
the lip.—i.c., p. 145.

DENDROCOLLA PRICEI, Rolfe.—Sent by Mr. W. R. Price from Formosa
in Ig12 to Kew, where it flowered in February last. It is allied to D. alba,
Ridl., and has pellucid white flowers with some brown and orange on the
lip.—l.c., p. 145.

CLEISOSTOMA ACUMINATUM, Rolfe.—Brought from Formosa by Mr. H.
J. Elwes, and flowered in his collection at Colesborne, Cheltenham, in
February last. It is allied to C. breviracema, Hayata, and has greenish
yellow sepals and petals, striped with brown, and a cream white lip with a
little yellow at the base.—l.c., p. 145.

MYSTACIDIUM GRACILLIMUM, Rolfe.—Introduced from Uganda by Mr. E.
Brown, and flowered at Glasnevin in December, 1911. The flowers are
semipellucid white.—l.c., p. 45.

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on July 15th, when there was a moderate display of Orchids,
and the awards consisted of three medals, one First-class Certificate, and
three Awards of Merit.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), J. S. Moss, Gurney Wilson, J. Wilson
Potter, R. G. Thwaites, F. M. Ogilvie, T. Armstrong, C. H. Curtis, W-
Cobb, J. Charlesworth, W. H. Hatcher, J. E. Shill, R. Brooman White,
W. Bolton, C. J. Lucas, H. G. Alexander, A. Dye, W. H. White, S. W.
Flory, and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
sent the handsome Anguloa Cliftonii bearing four flowers, Catasetum
Colmaniz, a striking flower spotted with red on the expanded yellow lip,
and the crest much thickened and dark brown in colour; and Odontioda
Papilio, having red flowers with some white markings on the petals, a white
front to the lip, and a bright yellow crest.

The Earl of Craven, Coombe Abbey, Coventry (gr. Mr. H. Chandler),
sent Leliocattleya Martinetii Coombe var. (C. Mossize Arnoldiana x Lelia
tenebrosa), having primrose yellow sepals and petals and a purple lip.

A. W. D. Oakes, Esq., Shortlands, Kent (gr. Mr. W. Fane), exhibited 4
fine plant of Aérides odoratum, bearing eight racemes of fragrant flowers-
The plant was imported in 1908.

M. Henri Graire, St. Fuscien, Amiens, sent Odontioda Brindejonc des
Moulinais (O. Devosiana x Odontoglossum Arlequin), with rather small
claret-coloured flowers.

SEs
TSS Basin ab enn

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 253

E. de Q. Quincey, Esq., Oakwood, Chislehurst, sent a well-flowered
plant of Cypripedium Wiertzianum.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including Sophrocatlelia Sibyl (S.-l. heatonensis X L.-c. Haroldiana), a
showy hybrid, with bronzy orange sepals and petals, and a purple lip with
darker veins, Leeliocattleya Ceres, Anguloa Cliftonii, Peristeria elata, two
plants of Catasetum Cliftonii, Cycnoches chlorochilon, Dendrobium
Dearei, a nearly white form of Miltonia vexillaria, Lycaste trifoliata, and
several good Odontoglossums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a showy group,
including Oncidium Kramerianum and amictum, Vanda coerulea,
Cirrhopetalum pulchrum, Chysis bractescens, Renanthera Imschootiana,
Coelogyne Massangeana, Aérides multiflorum, Cattleya Harrisoniana,
Odontioda Thwaitesii, Miltonia Bleuana, Cypripedium Maudie, and a few
Dendrobiums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including a
noble specimen of Vanda ccerulea, with thirty pairs of leaves, and a very
fine spike of pale blue flowers with darker recticulations, several good
Dendrobium Dearei, Ancistrochilus Thomsonianus, Rhynchostylis retusa,
Odontioda Vuylstekez, Charlesworthii, and _ keighleyensis, Maxillarid
nigrescens, Meleagris, and marginata, Bulbophyllum barbigerum, Dend-
rochilum filiforme, Odontonia Megali Sander, Cattleya Rothschildiana, C.
Mossiz Wageneri, and some good Leliocattleyas and Odontoglossums
(Silver Banksian Medal).

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

DENDROBIUM DEAREI MCBEAN’s vAR.—A remarkably fine form, much
larger than the type, and with very broad segments. Exhibited by Messrs.
J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

ODONTIODA COOKSONIZ VENUSTUM (C. Neetzliana X QO. armain-
villierense).—A large and finely-shaped form, having deep scarlet flowers,
with the front of the lip white and the crest yellow. Exhibited by Lt.-Col.
Sir George L. Holford, Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

ODONTIODA THWAITESII PURPLE EmpREss (C. vulcanica X O. Harry-
anum).—A very fine variety, having bronzy purple sepals and petals, and
the lip lilac freckled with white, with the crest yellow. Exhibited by E. H.
Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford.

PAPHINIA CRISTATA.—An old and striking species, seldom met with of
late years. It is allied to Lycaste, and is dwarf in habit, and bears a short
one or two-flowered scape, the flower being large, and claret-coloured with
transverse white lines, and the lip purple with white hairs at the apex.
Exhibited by Messrs. reste hatin & Co.

254 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (AuGusT, 1913.

At the meeting held on July 29th there was a moderate display of Orchids,
and the awards consisted of five medals, two Awards of Merit, and two
Cultural Commendations.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq, (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), R. Brooman White, W. Bolton, Sir Harry
J. Veitch, W. H. White, S. W. Flory, W. P. Bound, J. E. Shill, W. H:
Hatcher, J. Charlesworth, Walter Cobb, C. H. Curtis, T. Armstrong, A.
McBean, F. Sander, Gurney Wilson, C. J. Lucas, R. G. Thwaites, Arthur
Dye, and R. A. Rolfe.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham (gr. Mr./Black), received
a Bronze Banksian Medal for an interesting little group, containing four
good plants of Odontioda Thwaitesii, O. Charlesworthii, Odontoglossum
Harryanum and Thompsonianum, Cattleya Caduceus imperialis, a pretty
light form, C. Warscewiczii Frau Melanie Beyrodt, and several other good
Cattleyas.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
Sent a pretty white -Aérides.called A. odoratum album, Miltonia.vexillaria
Queen Alexandra, and M. v. radiata splendens, a fine form with racemes of
seven and eight flowers.

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent a
small plant of Odontioda Desdemona.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. White), sent
the rare Dendrobium polyphlebium, Odontoglossum Galeottianum, a dwa
Mexican species with white flowers, Bulbophyllum odoratissimum, and a
plant of Maxillaria fractiflexa with six flowers.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent
Odontoglossum eximium var. G. Hunt, and Odontioda keighleyensis
Ashstead Park var., bearing a spike of seventeen scarlet flowers, with white
bars on the sepals and petals, and some deep yellow on the disc of the lip.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a very charming
group, including the rare Paphinia cristata, Houlletia chrysantha,
Peristeria_ elata, Cycnoches chlorochilon, two beautiful examples of
Miltonia Roezlii alba, one with as many as eighteen spikes, M. vexillaria
superba, Cattleya Warscewiczii, Maxillaria Meleagris, Oncidioda Charles-
worthii, Odontioda keighleyensis, Odontoglossum armainvillierense
xanthotes, a good O. crispum, and an interesting Schombolelia from
Lelia tenebrosa and Schomburgkia tibicinis (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a good group, including
examples of Leeliocattleya Nysa, bletchleyensis and Henry Greenwood,
Cattleya Atalanta and Warscewiczii, Miltonia Bleuana, Cclogyne
Mooreana, the rare and pretty. Platanthera iantha, Cirrhopetalum,
biflorum, Ancistrochilus Thomsonianus, Cypripedium Kubele grandis,

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 255

glaucophyllum, and Rosetti, Trichopilia Galeottiana, Odontoglossum
Wallisii, Maxillaria Meleagris, Brassocattleya elegans (C. Aclandie x B.
Digbyana),. Dendrobium regium, Lelia monophylla, Oncidium Papilio,
and the allied O. Sandere, Anguloa uniflora, Brassolelia Gratrixie, and
others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged an interesting little group,
including a good example of Acineta Barkeri with two racemes, Odonto-
glossum percultum, a pretty hybrid from Cattleya Skinneri and Bowring-
iana, of intermediate character, and several good plants of Cattleya
Dowiana aurea and C. Thurgoodiana (Bronze Banksian Medal).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a beautiful little group of
Disa grandiflora, including about sixteen well-flowered plants (Bronze
Banksian Medal).

Mr. W. A. Manda, St. Albans, sent Cattleya Warscewiczii and three
well-flowered plants of C. Gaskelliana.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

MILTONIA CHARLESWORTHII VAR. Mrs. Ratii (Hyeana x vexillaria
memoria G. D. Owen).—A charming pink flower with darker pink spots at
the base of the lateral sepals, and a large triangular dark crimson mask at
the base of the lip. Exhibited by Pantia Ralli, Esq.

ODONTOGLOSSUM QUEEN ALEXANDRA VAR. THEODORA (triumphans X
Harryanum).—A fine form, bearing a spike of eight flowers, with yellow
sepals and petals heavily blotched with chocolate brown, and the lip white
with a large purple blotch and many basal spots. Exhibited by de Barri
Crawshay, Esq.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS

ANGR&CUM EICHLERIANUM.—To Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., for a
very fine specimen, over three feet high, and well furnished with flowers:
from the base to near the apex, the number of spikes being seventeen.

HABENARIA RHODOCHILA.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid-grower to Sir
Trevor Lawrence, Bart., Burford, for a beautiful group of two dozen well-
gtown plants arranged in a Jarge circular pan, and producing a very
charming effect.

Pe Ser 6

CycnocuHEs Forcetu, Rolfe.—Another interesting Peruvian Cycnoches.
has-just flowered with Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans. It belongs to
the section Heteranthe, but differs from C. peruvianum, Rolfe, in the
absence of purple spots on the sepals and petals and in the rather short,
broadly oblong segments of the lip, these not being slender and capitate as
in most of the allies. The sepals and petals may be described as light
green with a suffusion of pale reddish brown, and the lip as dull glaucous.
green. These flowers are, of couree, males.

256 THE ORCHID REVIEW. | AUGUST, 1913.

MILTONIA SANDER.
WE are indebted to The Garden for the opportunity

-

ey

some Miltonia Sanderew (M. St.-Andre X vexillaria memoria G. D. Owen),

)

a

curing the hand-

Fie. 56. MILTONIA SANDER.

for which Messrs. Sander & Sons received a First-class Certificate at the

e}
Pp»
i)

os
“I

+

—

o

*i

recent Holland House Show. Its characters are given at p<

: +
a brilliant acquisition.

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 257

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR AUGUST.
By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
THe temperatures and the conditions as given in the May number may still
be continued, and the remarks there made respecting watering, ventilation,
and atmospheric moisture still apply. The atmospheric condition of the
houses is one of the chief items in the cultivation of all Orchids, and this
must be maintained in a sweet and healthy condition at all times, otherwise
the plants cannot thrive. The recent warm, bright weather has suited the
inmates of the warmer division, and the plants during the last few weeks
have made rapid strides. Everything must now be done to encourage
growing plants to develop and build themselves up as speedily as possible.

During the present month we often have the hottest and driest weather
of the whole year, therefore shading and watering must have the closest
attention, for if the plants are to grow satisfactorily their needs must be
anticipated and every requirement satisfied. It is a good practice to give
those plants that are grown in the warmer houses rather more air at this
season, counteracting its drying influence with rather more atmospheric
moisture, thus enabling the plants to solidify themselves, so that they may
be thoroughly ripened before the cold, sunless winter months are upon
them. The weather we have had this season is in strong contrast to that
of last year, and undoubtedly the plants will show at the next time of
flowering a like contrast in their vigour, and the abundance and quality of
their flowers.

CocHLiopas and OponT1opAs.—Although the genus Cochlioda is small,
it has, through its hybrids, exerted a great influence in our collections.
Crossed with Odontoglossum it has brightened our Cool houses almost to
the point of rivalling the Cattleya house for brilliancy of colour, and as
time goes on still greater strides will be made with these favourite plants,
which can all be grown in a Cool house, and are consequently great
acquisitions. They succeed under the same conditions as Odontoglossums,
and should be grown in shallow pans suspended or raised well up to the
light the whole year round. They are little subject to insect pests ; like all
Cool house Orchids, thrip is their arch enemy, and this must be kept at bay.
Mild fumigations at regular intervals is the safest and best plan to adopt,
as prevention is better than cure. The plants are rather erratic in their
time of growing and flowering, and where many are grown there are nearly
always examples in bloom. The majority are now making their growths
for next year’s flowering, and when these young growths are about to push
forth roots is the best time to give new rooting material to any that may be
in need of it. They should be treated like Odontoglossums, and a similar
compost will satisfy their requirements.

258 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (Aucusr, 1913.

Mittoniopas and OncipiopAs.—Other bigeneric hybrids having
Cochlioda for one parent are Miltonioda and Oncidioda, and will be
much sought after as they become more plentiful. In the cultivation
of these bigeferic Orchids it is always safe to take the treatment of the
predominating partner in the plant, that is, the parent which the plant in
question most resembles. The Miltoniodas require more heat than the
Oncidiodas, and the former are best treated as Miltonias, the latter as
Oncidiums. The whole of these plants appear to have capabilities of
making fine specimen plants, and when this is assured the effect will be
wonderful.

Ca@LocyNnEs.—Plants of C. cristata and its varieties are making rapid
growth, and well-established specimens must not be allowed to suffer for
want of water. Plants which have recently been disturbed should be
watered sparingly until the new roots have become established in the
compost. These cool-growing Ccelogynes should never, in their growing
season, be exposed to a dry atmosphere; a damp situation is greatly to their
liking whilst in growth.

C@LOGYNE PANDURATA.-—Any plants which have passed out of flower,
and which have outgrown their receptacles, may have new rooting material
afforded them, provided they are pushing new roots from the base of the
partly-made pseudobulbs. Owing to its rambling nature, this is a some-
what difficult subject to keep in a limited space, therefore the old back
bulbs should be taken away whenever repotting isdone. A similar compost
to that used for the green-leaved Cypripediums will answer its requirements.
There are other Ccelogynes which, like C. pandurata, thrive in the Warm
house, and may also have attention as regards repotting should they be in
need of it.

CALANTHES.—The deciduous Calanthes, having now filled their pots
with roots, must have more water, with occasional waterings of weak
liquid-manure. This must not be given them too strong, as many cases of
disease are attributable to excessive feeding. It is important that the
plants should receive as much light as possible without being scorched by
the sun. They should be grown near the roof glass, and be allowed plenty
of fresh air, which consolidates the growth as it is made.

CypRIPEDIUMs of the winter-flowering section are now in full growth,
and should be freely supplied with water at the roots, and on bright days
may be sprayed overhead. They may receive a supply of fresh air oP
every favourable occasion, and on warm nights a little ventilation will be
beneficial. When these plants are grown in a hot and close atmosphere
the foliage is limp and soft and the flowers weak.

LA&LIA ANCEPs and its varieties are fast developing their pseudobulbs,
and the flower spikes are also pushing up freely. Liberal supplies of water

SE re

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 259'

at the roots and slight syringings may be afforded them during hot weather.
These plants should not be shaded excessively, as they are sun-loving
plants, and only sufficient shade should be given them to prevent scorching.
The house should be shut up early in the afternoon to raise the temperature
considerably.. It may then be opened again during the night, as the night
air is beneficial to these plants. To sum up the cultivation of these plants:
in a few words, it is warm days and cool nights that they require. These
Christmas-flowering Orchids are worth any amount of pains to flower them
satisfactorily.

CATTLEYAS, L&#LIOCATTLEYAS and allied subjects should be potted, as
previously advised, whenever they are in need of it and are pushing new
roots. I may appear to dwell upon this point toa great extent, but I am
firmly of the opinion that many Cattleyas have been lost in the past by
being overhauled at a season when they would have been better left alone.
In such an extensive family as this it is obvious that they are not all in a fit
condition to repot at any one season of the year. Plants of C. Bowringiana
and its hybrids that are in full growth require plenty of water at the roots
until the new pseudobulbs are formed. Care must be taken that the water
does not settle in the bracts or sheaths which encircle the bottom of the
young pseudobulbs, which is peculiar to this section of Cattleya, as such
accumulation of water often means the loss of the bulb, with its flower
spike, and in some cases may mean the loss of the plant. The cultivation
of all Cattleyas is so simple, and the treatment of one species so much like
the others—with the exception that they require this treatment at a different
season—that I am at a loss to understand why they should be considered
difficult subjects.

PLEIONES.—The various Pleiones, as they complete their growth, should
be exposed to more light, and be allowed more air than heretofore, but
should receive sufficient water at the roots to keep the.compost moist and
the bulbs plump until the foliage falls. After this occurs they will need
water in very limited quantities until the flower buds appear, when the. supply
should be increased until the flowers are fully developed. After the flowers
have faded the plants require sufficient water to keep the pseudobulbs from
shrivelling until they commence to grow in the spring. The cooler-growing
species, P. Hookeriana and P.. humilis, must still have liberal supplies of
water at the roots until their season’s growth is completed.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA AND ITS HYBRIDS.—Towards the end of the month
those plants which flowered early in the season will have commenced to
grow vigorously, and those in need of fresh rooting material should have
attention. The repotting of this family is best extended over this month
and the next, as it is possible to have some one or other of them in bloom
right through the summer months, therefore it is quite obvious they are not

260 THE ORCHID REVIEW. { AUGUST, 1913,

all ready to pot at one time. The autumn-flowering varieties are best left
over until the early spring months before repotting is attempted. A similar
compost to that used for Odontoglossums will answer their requirements,
and a suitable position for them is a moist position in the Intermediate
house. M. Bleuana should be found a slightly warmer position than M.
vexillaria, whilst M. Roezlii, and its variety alba, should be found a position
in the warm Intermediate house.

PHALNOPSIS.—The large flowering varieties, such as P. Schilleriana,
P. Aphrodite, P. Stuartiana, P. Sanderiana, and the free-growing P.
amabilis Rimestadiana, owing to the favourable season, have made
considerable progress with their new leaves. A high sun-heated
temperature is always to their benefit. During the warm weather every
opportunity should be taken to ventilate the house in which they are
growing, as a daily supply of fresh air is important. It is advisable that
the house should be shut early in the afternoons, thoroughly damping the
floors and staging, and everything under and about the hot water pipes.
The temperature should be maintained at night as nearly as possible from
70° to 75°, and should the temperature fall lower no damping down should
be done until the former figure is reached. The chief causes of failure with
these plants are a low, damp atmosphere and saturated sour material at the
roots.

OpoNTOGLOssU Ms.—Towards the end of the month, should the weather |
not be too hot, a commencement can be made with the repotting of these
plants. Take each plant as it gets into the desired condition, and should
there be any likelihood of the compost becoming decomposed, don’t
hesitate to repot, as these plants cannot thrive in sour compost. A
compost as previously advised for this genus will be found quite satis-
factory.

DenprosiuMs.—During the present month many of the Dendrobiums,
especially those of the D. nobile section, will be completing their growth.
It will be necessary to examine them frequently, in order that those which
have completed their growth, and have the terminal leaf fully expanded,
may be removed to a cooler and dryer atmosphere, where they will receive
the benefit of more light and air. They should be exposed gradually to full
sunshine in order to thoroughly mature the newly-made growths, and
should receive sufficient water to keep them plump.

GENERAL REMARKS.—We are fast reaching that season of the year when
we shall have to make preparation for the safe keeping of the plants during
the winter, and it will therefore be. advisable to put everything that. Is
considered faulty in the heating apparatus, or other. things appertaining to
the successful working of the houses, in thorough repair. The work for
the month will consist of the usual routine of potting and cleaning, and

—_—————_——————_ rr ee--”,rr,,lrlrlcl rte
.

AUGUST, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 264

attention to the different matters which makes for the general health of the
plants under our charge. No armistice must be allowed to those foes
which infest our plants and houses, and every means must be taken for
their destruction.

: ORCHIDS AT BRISTOL.
SOME fine Orchid groups were staged in the Horticultural section of
the Royal Agricultural Society’s Exhibition held at Bristol from July rst to-
5th last.

In the class for a collection of Orchids arranged for effect in a space of
Too square feet the first prize was awarded to Messrs. Armstrong & Brown,.
Tunbridge Wells, and the second to Messrs. James Cypher & Sons,
Cheltenham, both staging brilliant groups.

Among non-competitive exhibits the outstanding feature was a
magnificent group of Orchids staged by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford,
K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander), in which the Cattleyas, Leelio-
cattleyas, and Odontoglossums were’ especially brilliant. A Large Gold
Medal was awarded.

A Gold Medal was awarded to Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, for
Orchids, Roses, and Carnations.

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons,.
Bradford, and a Silver Medal to Lt.-Col. Cary-Batten, Leigh Lodge, for
good groups of Orchids.

A deputation from the Royal Horticultural Society was present and
made the following awards for Orchids :—

A Gold Medal to Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Weston-
birt (gr. Mr. Alexander).

A Standard Cup to Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells.

Silver Banksian Medals to Lt.-Col. Cary-Batten, Leigh Lodge, Bristol,
and Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford.

— eo

CycnocuEs Cooperi.—When this striking novelty was described it was.
remarked that the female flowers were as yet unknown, also that the plant
had passed into the collection of the Rev. J. C. B. Fletcher, Mundham
Vicarage, Chichester. Mr. Fletcher now writes that the plant is in flower
again, this time producing three good female flowers, one of which is sent
to us. The colour is chocolate-brown, and on comparison with C.
pentadactylon, to which the species is most allied, we find that the female
of C. Cooperi is rather larger, and the segments relatively rather more
acute. The female of C. pentadactylon is green with some very dark
brown blotches on the base of the segments. Mr. Fletcher must be:
congratulated on having obtained the other sex so quickly.—R.A.R.

262 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Aucust, 1913,

SCHOMBURGKIA THOMSONIANA.

A PLANT of this striking Schomburgkia, that was recently sent from the
‘Grand Cayman Islands, West Indies, by Mr. T. M. Savage English, has
just flowered at Kew, producing a panicle of light yellow flowers with the
front lobe of the lip very dark purple. Two dried flowers were also sent,
with the following interesting note :—

“‘T do not think that there is more than one species here, but it is most
variable in size and colour. It may have a spike a few inches long with
itwo flowers, or even one, or the spike may be as long as six feet six inches
‘with fifty-eight flowers. This is the largest I have found, and the bulb
had five leaves. Its colours may be white, cream, lemon, orange, lilac, or
-dull pink mixed with yellow (like some tea roses), with the lip ranging from
comparatively pale purple to almost black. It is scented in the morning
-only—like lilac—though many plants have scentless flowers, and this seems
to have no reference to their colour. The plant is very common here. I
enclose two flowers, the larger white and the other lemon.”

This throws a somewhat new light on the history of the species, which
has already been given in detail (O.R., ix. pp. 325, 326). It was originally
described by Reichenbach in 1886, at which time nothing was stated about
‘its habit, though two years later a Schomburgkia collected by Mr. W.
Fawcett, F.L.S., in the Cayman Islands was sent to Kew and identified
with S. Thomsoniana. A living plant was also sent, which afterwards
flowered and was figured in the Botanical M agazine (t. 7815). In the mean-
‘time materials were collected by Dr. Strachan, who distinguished two
varieties, albopurpurea and minor, the former apparently agreeing with the
original type. Both were found in Grand Cayman, but Dr. Strachan only
collected the variety minor in Cayman Brac, a small group of islets about
100 miles distant from Grand Cayman, where also Mr. Fawcett’s plants,
-corresponding to the variety minor, were obtained. The living plant sent
by Mr. English belongs here, and agrees well with the one figured except
in having paler yellow sepals and petals.

The significance of this remarkable variation in Grand Cayman remains
‘to be explained. Such a condition of things is parallelled among hybrids,
-and it may be that here the two forms, considered distinct, by Dr. Strachan,
both in colour and size, hybridise together. Further observations would
be interesting, especially as to whether the larger form is absent from
“Cayman Brac, and what variations occur there. In Grand Cayman Dr.
Strachan remarked that the larger variety was the most abundant, and he
»makes no mention of any other variation.

S. Thomsoniana is allied to S. tibicinis, Batem., but has smaller and

-usually more numerous flowers, of different colour.
R.A.R.

AUGUST, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 263

MOSQUITOES POLLINATING ORCHIDS.
A NEW use for mosquitoes is described in a recent issue of Science (xxxvii.
p- 867) by Mr. John S. Dexter, of Columbia University, U.S.A. He
remarks :—-

‘“‘ Early in July, 1912, Miss Ada K. Dietz, who was doing research work
in plant ecology at the University of Michigan Biological Station at
Douglas Lake, told me that she had seen in Ree’s Bog a mosquito bearing
on its head two small yellow masses that looked like pollen. I went to the
bog and found many mosquitoes there. In a few minutes I had caught
a half-dozen or more, all of them females, bearing the yellow masses. On
closer examination these proved to be pollinia of the Orchid Habenaria
obtusata (Pursh.), which was at one time abundant in the bog and in full
bloom. Most of the mosquitoes carried one pollinium, some had two or
three, and one had four pollinia attached to its eyes.

‘This Orchid is small, green, and inconspicuous, but very similar in the
structure of its flower to Orchis mascula, described by Darwin in his book
on the Fertilization of Orchids, and by Miiller in The Fertilization of Flowers.
Also, the complex process of pollination as described in the last-named
book (p. 535) for O. mascula might apply almost unchanged for H. obtusata
with mosquitoes instead of bees for the pollen-bearers.

“*T gathered a number of the plants and a few mosquitoes that were
free from pollinia and put them together in a glass aquarium jar. In a few
days the mosquitoes had removed most of the pollinia from the flowers and
now bore them on their eyes exactly as had those caught outside.

**T did not learn the.name of the mosquito concerned. It was probably
not Culex pipiens, which is mentioned by Miiller as a visitor to the flowers
of Rhamnus Frangula. So far as I know, this is the only case reported in
which mosquitoes seem to be of primary importance as agents of
pollination.”

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS. |
Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during August,
on the 12th and 26th, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual
hour, 12 o’clock noon.

The next meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid
Society will be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on August 21st.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to members and
the public from 1 to 4 o’clock p.m.

Girt oF ORCHIDS BY SIR GEORGE HoLrorp.—tThe last issue of the

264 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [AuGUST, 1913.

Kew Bulletin remarks: ‘‘ The Kew collection of Orchids has recently been
greatly enriched by the gift of about 150 large plants of Cattleya, Lelia,
Leliocattleya, Brassocattleya, Cymbidium, and Cypripedium by Lt.-Col.
Sir George Holford, from his famous collection at Westonbirt. While the
collection of Orchids cultivated at Kew must be essentially botanical, its
main object being to represent the family in as comprehensive a way as:
possible, the great progress made in recent years in the breeding of hybrids,
many of which are botanically interesting as well as possessed of
exceptional claims as garden plants, necessitated the addition of a selection
of them to the collection. Increased accommodation was provided last
year by the erection of an Intermediate house adjoining the T-Range, and,
thanks to Sir George’s generosity, Kew now possesses some of the best of
the Cattleyoid hybrids.”

CLEISOSTOMA SECUNDUM.—This pretty little Burmese species, which
was described six years ago (Rolfe in Kew Bull., 1907, p. 132), has agaim
flowered at Glasnevin. It was introduced by Messrs. Hugh Low & Co.,
who first flowered it, and from whom the Glasnevin plant was obtained. The
flowers are borne in one-sided racemes, some four to six inches long, and are
light purple with a darker front lobe to the lip. It much resembles a
Saccolabium, but has a characteristic 2-lobed callus on the foot of the
column, closing the orifice of the lip. The leaves are narrow, fleshy, and
four to six inches long.—R.A.R.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

CYMBIDIUM EBURNEQ-LOWIANUM (well-flowered).—Journ. Hort., 1913, 1-
p- 606, with fig.

L2LIOCATTLEYA GOTTOIANA THE PRESIDENT.—Gard. Mag., 1913; P-
500, with fig.

MILTONIA SANDER#.—Garden, 1913, p. 352, with fig.

OpONTIODA HArRWwoopitt FowLer’s vAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 521%,
with fig.

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

Orchids are named ase pinta answered here as far rs pednpanae Depp sae ie are

“ ested to give the native country or pa tte ge of plants sent. p postcard must be

ent if a rep! y by post is desired brag ; fbi , ostcards oe i “Wied ’. "habjaets of special’
poy will be dealt with i é body of t rk}.

G.c.— ee” 2 name, which we gue oe” next month.
S.F., E.F.C.—We will examine and r
A.J. K. —Letter ‘llows

Photograph received with thanks.—Mrs. R.

Catalogue received.— We have received from W. A. Ma nda, S. Orange, New Jeisey; 4
establishment of Novelties and Specialities, including a photograph of a Cattelya House in the:

esta

Err The Odontoglossum figured at page 208 under the name of Odontoglnen=
copa 'F leicht should have been ©. crispum Robertsii. Please correct.

bee ORCHID REVIEX, -

VoL. XXI.] oa POM ees ks [No. 249.

OUR NOTE BOOK.

THE following deserves a more permanent record than the columns of the
daily press, whence it was culled for our benefit. The occasion was the
appearance of what is called ‘the new Princess Mary Orchid,” whose
portrait appears at page 176. We have omitted a few lines at the end
which did not relate to Orchids :—

THE ORCHID BUILDERS.

THE BREATHLESS ROMANCE OF THE NURSES OF NEW FLowERs.
NaTuRE is not, on the whole, a gardener. She does splendidly with blue-
bells in the spring, with wild roses in the summer, and berries in the
autumn; but, on the whole, she is too slapdash and fluky and parochial for
the average gardener’s tastes. Her methods are not ambitious enough,
Human gardeners have been trying for untold generations to show her how
to make the most of her astonishing material.

This is especially so to-day with Orchids. Nature does not grow
Orchids as men do. When she produced an Orchid, say, in South.
America, she probably thought she had done very well; but men were not
Satisfied with that. They got another Orchid from Brazil, put the two
together, and produced a third—more beautiful than either of the original
Ones. Nature remains content with bees or other insects for reproduction,
and they, unfortunately, do not care to travel thousands of miles in the
interests of horticulture.

But professional Orchid growers think nothing of travelling over a
whole continent to look for Orchids, and one result is that two plants which
grow in a wild state 4,000 miles apart may find themselves neighbours in a
Chelsea glasshouse—and not only neighbours, but in the surprising position
of being parents of a third Orchid, an entirely new plant, of amazing form
and colour, which unaided Nature could never have produced.

This making of Orchids is one of the few romantic trades_left. In
distant countries collectors wander about for months, climbing mountains,
exploring the banks of rivers, and going into wild places where men have
hardly ever been before. When they find a new Orchid they carefully dig it

265

266 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

up, or take the seed pod, and when they have found enough they send them
back to England. There they are nursed in glasshouses, where the soil
and temperature are made as nearly as possible the same as in their homes,
and in a few years two specially fine plants are selected to become parents
of that triumph of the gardener—a new Orchid.

This improving on Nature is a long business. When the pollen is
transferred from one flower to another—an office performed in the ordinary
way by some insect—the flower quickly withers, and then gradually
produces a large seed pod containing in six months or so thousands of
little seeds. When the pod bursts the seeds are collected and sprinkled on
the surface of a mossy soil under growing plants, just as in a wild state the
seeds fall on to the ground. Soon the seeds swell, and in due time they
are removed into roomier quarters, and eventually promoted to a pot each.
But it is years before they flower, and the gardener who is anxious to see
what he has produced may have to wait six years to know.

But although it is a slow business it is a very exciting one. The grower
never knows what flower he will produce. For all he knows it may be
yellow or green, or white, big or small, round or pointed. Even flowers
that have come out of the same seed pod are never exactly the same. They
will have a family likeness, but there is always some difference. Some-
times the grower fails. The offspring of two magnificent parents may be a
poor weedy thing fit only to be thrown away, and then the care of years is
wasted. But usually the grower can rely on getting a good plant when he
is content with parents that are thoroughbreds, or at any rate are not the
result of several crosses. Nature rebels after a time, and can be improved
upon only up to a certain point. Beyond that point she refuses to go, and
the skill of the grower is in knowing exactly how far he may take
liberties, and, of course, in selecting plants that are most likely to produce
a beautiful and healthy offspring.

The skilled grower is really a creative artist who uses the materials
which Nature has given him as a painter uses his brush. He is always
trying to produce something new, and every year he has his successes and
his failures. His anxious moments are when after, say, six years the bud
of an Orchid opens and he sees what he has created. It may be a weed, or
it may be a triumph of form and colour which will be hailed as the Orchid
of the year.

After the little disquisition on Nomenclature given last month, the
ollowing note in the Gardeners’ Chronicle for August 2nd naturally caught
our eye :—

‘* How PLANTs ARE NAMED.—The following conversation between tw0
experts took place at a recent fortnightly meeting of the R.H.S.: Aw

eo

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 267

‘Have you ever seen this plant before?’ B.: ‘I don’t think I have;
it appears to be something new.’ A.: ‘I know it is new, as it
comes from a place where no collector has ever been. No one here knows
Be 8. * How did it get the name it bears?’ A.: ‘Oh, I named it, as
the Society will not look at a plant that is unnamed.’ B.: ‘ Have you tried
Kew?’ A.: ‘It is no use sending plants there, as they give them any kind
of name; they won’t bother.’ B.: ‘But they will. The collections of
living and dried plants are maintained to enable them to identify plants,
and I know they do a lot of it.’ A.: ‘I wouldn’t ask them. I would
rather name my plants myself.’ B.: ‘Then you would most likely make a
mistake. It doesn’t follow because a plant is not known to cultivators that
it has not already been named by someone competent to doit.’ A.: ‘ Surely
when I introduce a new plant I have the right to name it?’ B.: ‘ But you
must first find out if it is new and nameless.’ A.: ‘ Well, I know this is
new.’ B. took particulars of the plant, went to Kew and found that it was
well known there, a figure of it having been published in the Botanical
Magazine a few years ago.—Eavesdropper.”

Now we were a little curious to know what this plant might be, and a
judicious inquiry served to reveal its identity. On looking the matter up
we find that B. might have scored another point, for not only was a new
name unnecessary, but the one chosen consisted of three words, a practice
which is contrary to the rules. The matter may be read in connection with
a note at page 235. Happily the plant is not an Orchid, so we will
conclude by saying—Horticultural Papers please copy.

ORCHIDS AT BRUSSELS.
MM. A. A. PEETERS & FILs.’ ESTABLISHMENT.
SINCE our previous visit to Brussels, five years ago, the establishment of
MM. A. A. Peeters & Fils. has been moved from St. Gilles to Laeken, where
a fine block of twenty-seven new houses has been erected on the latest
Principles, and these we have now had the pleasure of seeing.

We first inspected a fine series of Miltonia vexillaria hybrids, obtained
from several fine varieties crossed with the handsome M. v. memoria G. D.
Owen. There were some 500 plants, mostly in flower or spike, and showing
much variation in colour, but without reproducing the remarkable crimson
mask of the pollen parent. Some of them had an orange brown disc to the
lip, while others resembled the typical form. Examples of M. Bleuana
(vexillaria x Roezlii) were in bloom, but M. Peeters has also seedlings
derived from the reverse cross, M. Roezlii being the seed parent, and these
are not such strong growers, having more of the Roezlii character. These
are known as M. Bleuana var. Peetersiana. M. Bleuana X M. vexillaria

268 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913.

Leopoldii was also in spike, and plants of this cross have flowered. A few
capsules were noticed, and a seedling Odontonia Lambeauiana (M.
Warscewiczii X O. Lambeauianum) was pointed out. Here were two nice
plants of the miniature Saccolabium fragrans, one of them being in bloom.
They have been here for seven or eight years, having been found in an
importation of Vanda ccerulea. The latter species is represented in
quantity, some being old plants and over two feet high, and M. Peeters
remarked that plenty of light and air was the secret of success.

Coming to the Cypripediums we found a remarkably fine batch of C.
Rolfei, the plants being grown in pure loam, M. Peeters remarking that
this is the only way to grow and flower them well. They are stood on tiles,
and great care is taken not to get the compost too wet, which is considered
highly important. The leaves are handsomely mottled, and and one of the
largest measured nearly a foot long. Last season as many as 150 plants
were in bloom together, some of them having six spikes, and forming a
magnificent sight. M. Peeters remarked that C. Rolfei is a bad parent. It
was hoped to utilise so fine a thing in hybridising, and many crosses with
C. Maudiz, both as seed and pollen parent, have been made, but in no case
has a seed been found. A few of the summer-flowering kinds were in
bloom, including a seedling of C. Schlesingerianum x Fairrieanum, the
latter being of good shape, with a richly-blotched dorsal sepal.

One side of a Cypripedium house was filled with the brilliant Renanthera
Imschootiana, many plants being in bloom. Both it and Vanda ccerulea
are grown in leaf mould, with a surfacing of sphagnum, and very carefully
watered. They are treated much alike, except that the Renanthera likes a
little more heat than the Vanda. Here a good plant of Cattleya labiata
Peetersiana was pointed out, which came out of Messrs. Sander’s first large
importation over twenty years ago.

After passing through a house of seedlings in excellent health, where we
noticed a Vanilla trained on the roof, we came to a fine lot of Phalaenopsis
amabilis Rimestadiana, some of them finely in bloom, and here an
interesting. albino was pointed out. It was not in bloom, but the lip is
said to be without a trace of purple markings. A flower was self-fertilised:
and produced a capsule, but it contained no seed, and the plant was severely
checked by the operation. A good P. Sanderiana was also in bloom. The
compost used for Phalznopsis is composed of equal parts of polypodium
fibre, sphagnum moss, and leaf-mould, and these plants are in thriving
condition. Here was also a fine batch of Oncidium splendidum growing in
leaf-mould, and the plants were as clean and sturdy as any one need wish
to see. Some of them have been grown for fifteen years, A lot of O.
Kramerianum at the end of the house bore about three dozen spikes,
making a fine show.

ee

SEPTEMBER, 191 3.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 269

Passing along the Corridor we noticed some Cypripediums in bloom.
These were obtained from C. Maudie x C. insigne Sander, and the
reverse cross, but all reverted to coloured forms, and M. Peeters remarked
that there was not a single albino in a large batch.

We now passed into a house of Brassocattleyas and other Brassavola
hybrids, all from choice crosses and in robust health. We noticed a good
B.-c. Veitchii in bloom. '

Coming to a series of four Odontoglossum houses, we noticed many
interesting things in flower or spike, including a lot of seedlings showing
remarkable variation. Seedlings from O. crispum Madouxianum, which is
a very dark form, had in many cases much white in the flower, and were
variously blotched, but none were equal to the original form. 0. c.
Madouxianum X O. c. Marie showed a remarkable range of variation,
including both white, rosy, and blotched forms, and O. c. Marie X O.c.
Luciani also contained both white and dark forms. Many seedlings of O.
Fascinator X O.c. Madame Valcke were in bloom, and varied enormously
in the amount of spotting. Some of them would pass for O. Adriane were
the origin not known, while a few others were unspotted, including both
yellow and rosy forms. Among more familiar things in bloom were forms
of O. crispum Lambeauianum, excellens, triumphans, &c., with a few
Odontioda Bradshawie and others. Here were also seedlings of O.
Vuylstekez recrossed with C. Neetzliana, and a lot of other Odontioda and
Odontoglossum crosses, the seedlings being very numerous and in thriving
condition. <A lot of O.crispum from a very old importation were pointed
out, but these were not in bloom.

The Cattleyas formed a fine series, and we noticed a couple of C.
Mossiz Wageneri in bloom, with various others, and a fine lot of seedlings,
but these and other interesting things must be passed over. The estab-
lishment is in excellent condition, and a high standard of culture is
maintained. The use of spent tobacco stalks upon the hot water pipes is
said to be an excellent preventive against thrip, and it is unfortunate that
the duty on tobacco prevents this excellent system being adopted in
England. Hybridising is carried on extensively, only the finest forms being
used as parents, but the many promising crosses must pass unnoticed till
they bloom. We congratulate Messrs. Peeters on the excellent condition
of the establishment generally.

M. DELANGHE VERVAENE’S NURSERY.

One of the things specially impressed upon us by M. Francois Peeters
was the importance of visiting the establishment of M. Delanghe Vervaene,
the originator of the leaf-mould culture of Orchids, who still remains loyal
to the system. We had no difficulty in finding the way, and were welcomed
by a gentleman with a handful of Cattleya flowers, who proved to be M.

27° THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913.

Delanghe himself. Our credentials being in order we were quickly
introduced to the objects of our search, and we were frankly surprised.
We had almost forgotten that as long ago as 1898 we had seen at the
Ghent Quinquennial Exhibition the first-prize plant of Oncidium sarcodes,
with a spike five feet high, also a group of five similar plants, all exhibited
by M. Delanghe Vervaene, of which we remarked that they were grown in
leaf-mould, and potted like ordinary plants, with a few crocks at the bottom
of the pot (O.R., vi. p. 140). We also recalled the fact that some twelve
years ago a Commission was appointed by the Société Nationale d’Horti-
culture de France to report upon the question, and that a summary of its
report appeared in our columns (O.R., ix. pp. 321-324). But we retained a
vivid recollection of the fact that the system had been tried in England,
and was generally voted a failure. In the presence of plants, however, that
were not only alive after fifteen years of the treatment, but also strong and
healthy, and flowering freely, scepticism was at an end, and we felt a strong
desire to understand a little about the matter. And now we will follow our
notes.

About twenty houses are devoted to Orchids, which are grown for cut
bloom. In the first house entered we found a lot of sound healthy Cattleyas
of the labiata group, with a number of Lelia purpurata varieties, Lzlio-
cattleya Canhamiana, Aphrodite, and others, with sturdy plants of Oncidium
splendidum on the side stages. A good number of Cattleyas were in spike
or flower, especially Cattleya Mossiz and Mendelii, and the quality was
excellent. Pots of fairly large size are used; a large crock is placed over
the hole, and the compost, which consists largely of decaying beech leaves
with a few oak leaves, is pressed in very firmly, and the work is then
completed for two or three years. The watering seems to be the one
important matter, and this M. Delanghe does entirely himself, but s°
seldom is it considered necessary that the compost decays very slowly,
giving a steady supply of nutriment to the roots, which remain in a sound
healthy condition. Of this we had ocular demonstration, for M. Delanghe
knocked some plants out of the pots to show us the condition of the roots.
An adequate amount of moisture in the atmosphere is considered of the
highest importance, with ample ventilation, and lath roller blinds are largely
used for shading.

There are Cattleyas in the collection that have been there twenty years;
and one fine form of C. Trianz is now represented by over forty plants,
obtained by dividing one original one. Some of the Lzliocattleyas are said
to grow and flower twice a year. In such a business a succession of flowers
is important, and in some cases this is secured for six weeks by keeping the
plants in different conditions. The succession is further secured by
selecting batches of the species which flower at different seasons of the yeat-

SEPTEMBER, 1913. | THE ORCHID REVIEW. 271

‘The two Leliocattleyas mentioned were raised in the collection, and
there is a lot of seedlings. C. Harrisoniana has been crossed with nearly
all the species of the labiata group, and some of them have flowered. C.
Harrisoniana X Schrceedere is a pretty pink hybrid with some yellow on
the disc. C. granulosa x Warscewiczii is also thought much of.

Cattleyas are extensively grown, houses being largely devoted to C.
Trianz, C. Gaskelliana, and C. Harrisoniana, while another contains various
choice varieties, all in vigorous health, and we noticed many with double
breaks. It may be added that M. Delanghe does not care to see the roots
outside the compost, where he thinks they are not getting enough nutriment.

Oncidium splendidum is grown in quantity, strong, sturdy plants, with
clean healthy leaves, in some cases over ten inches long, and the compost
apparently very dry. There were also many O. varicosum and a few O.
sarcodes, with sturdy plants of O. macranthum. A house of Odontoglossum
crispum and Pescatorei contained many plants in spike or bloom. The
plants were grown on a bed of cinders, but do not compare with the others
in point of vigour. One house contained Vanda ceerulea*and Odonto-
glossums, while another was largely devoted to Cypripedium insigne, with
QO. crispum at the end.

It was very interesting to see the original home of a method of culture
that has been so much discussed, and if any lesson was learnt it is that
everything depends upon the watering. Probably M. Delanghe could grow
Orchids in the more orthodox composts, but at least he has learnt how to
use leaf-mould as a substitute, with a good deal of success. Perhaps the
method is not one for ordinary mortals—it is too much like conjuring.

BRUSSELS BOTANIC GARDEN.

A fine collection of Orchids is grown at the Brussels Botanic Garden, for
not only are three houses set apart for their culture, but others are grown
in an ecologic collection, where they are grown with aroids, ferns, and
various other epiphytes, on trunks and branches of trees to imitate the way
they occur in nature, and besides these a lot of Congo Orchids, with a few
Malayan species, are grown with ordinary stove plants, where they thrive
exceedingly.

Many interesting things were in bloom in the general collection, where
we noticed a fine example of Gongora bufonia with three spikes, G. galeata,
Lycaste aromatica and xytriophora, Dendrobium fimbriatum oculatum and
Brymerianum, the rare Acanthophippium sylhetense, Sarcanthus pallidus,
a fine plant of Cymbidium Lowianum, Mormolyce lineolata, Epidendrum
variegatum and ionosmum, Ccelia Baueriana, a fine plant of Physosiphon
Lindleyi, Lelia majalis, the rare Acineta Hrubyana in spike, and many
others, including some of the more familiar species which we did not \note.
Oncidium was represented by examples of O. flexuosum, Gardneri, concolor,

272 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913

Marshallianum, graminifolium, Harrisonianum, and phymatochilum, and
Maxillaria by M. Binoti, Meleagris, variabilis, and Fernandiana. Of
Cypripedium we noted C. Lowii, barbatum, villosum, and various others,
including the interesting C. Frankeanum, whose history was given at page
179. Some small seedlings of Zygopetalum xX Lycaste were pointed out,
and it will be interesting to see what they are like when they flower.

In a small Cool house we noted in bloom several examples of Pleuro-
thallis stenopetala, the remarkable P. platystachys, Grobyi, prolifera,
Lansbergii, and cuneifolia, Octomeria diaphana, Scaphosepalum ochthodes,
Masdevallia infracta, and various others, with the brilliant Sophronitis
grandiflora. Many interesting things were pointed out not then in bloom,
and we must pass them over.

The ecologic house was particularly interesting, for here one might see
various epiphytes growing in something like natural conditions, these
including aroids, ferns, and similar plants of habit, with of course many
Orchids. Among those in flower were Phalenopsis Lueddemanniana,
Gongora bufonia, Anguloa Ruckeri, a fine Epidendrum Parkinsonianum,
Stelis omalosantha, Maxillaria F ernandiana, with a good many not in
bloom. Most of the plants seemed as much at home as when in pots, and
the effect was very realistic.

Lastly must be mentioned the Congo species, and a few others from the
Malayan region which grow in a similar climate. These are grown in the
warmest house in the garden, in a stove temperature, with aroids and other
heat- and moisture-loving plants, and were thriving amazingly. The point
is emphasized, because formerly an attempt was made to grow them in the
ordinary Orchid houses, where they made little progress, and some were
with difficulty kept alive. There were several plants of Dipodium pictum in
bloom, a really striking Orchid, the remarkable Madagascar Aéranthes
grandiflora, Mystacidium distichum, Phalenopsis Lueddermanniana, the
distinct Bulbophyllum Gentilii, Polystachya mystacioides, polychaete,
affinis, mayombensis, and Laurentii, with a number of others not then in
bloom. A good many of those from the Congo are types of species
described by Dr. E. de Wildemann, Director of the Garden, and thus are
of special interest. Several plants of the striking Sumatran Cirrhopetalum
campanulatum were pointed out, the flowers being just over, and on one of
them we counted as many as sixteen old spikes. Vanilla Lujz, Laurentiana,
and grandiflora are represented by large plants which have not yet reached
the flowering stage.

The collection-shows a marked improvement on what we saw five years
ago, and its present condition reflects the greatest credit on the Curator,
M. Louis Gentil, and his assistants, who find the usual difficulties in
growing such a varied collection in few houses.

273

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

SEPTEMBER, I913-|

THE REICHENBACHIAN HERBARIUM.

THE sixth of May next will witness the twenty-fifth anniversary of the

death of Professor H. G. Reichenbach

the successor of Dr. Lindley as the

?

great authority on Orchids, and the near approach of the event serves to

Fig. 57.

THE LATE Pror. H. G. REICHENBACH.

recall an action which staggered the scientific world, and struck a cruel

blow at the progress of Orchidology for the time being; we allude to the

late Professor’s act in sealing up his entire herbarium and collection of

274 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913.

drawings for a quarter of a century. The consternation caused by this
malicious act still remains fresh in the minds of some of our readers.

Professor Reichenbach died on May 6th, 1889, and an appreciative
Obituary notice appeared in the Gardeners’ Chronicle for May 18th, in which
the deceased’s long services to Orchidology were alluded to in highly
appreciative terms. We may repeat the following paragraph as to the man
and his work :—

‘‘ Reichenbach was possessed of remarkably distinct individuality, which
was as remarkable as his curiously crabbed handwriting which few could
decipher. Short and massive in stature till his recent illness, with a keen
penetrating glance and an aquiline nose, his features revealed something of
the impetuous temper of the man, and his occasional biting sarcasm. His
devotion to Orchids amounted to a consuming passion ; not a scrap, nor a
note, nor a drawing, however rough, came amiss to him if it related to an
Orchid. To him meals and clothes were necessary evils, but his herbarium
was a prime necessity of existence. The amount of his work was
prodigious. Of its quality the botanists of the future will judge better
than we. One thing, however, is obvious, and especially to those who
have had the opportunity of comparing his work with Lindley’s. In
Lindley’s time Orchids were, it may be said, counted by the score, while
in our time the estimate has to be made by the hundred if not by the
thousand. Lindley, with his clear perception, logical mind, and relatively
small material, was able to trace sharply defined, expressive characters in
few words, arranged with rare skill. Reichenbach, with a totally different
frame of mind, was overburdened with the ever-increasing mass of material.
His descriptions and comparisons were often singularly felicitous, his
knowledge of detail enormous, but lacking co-ordination and precision.
He never gave us ina compendious form a complete synopsis of the genera
and species. It is greatly to be hoped that his immense collections and
notes will fall into competent hands (at Kew if possible), for collation and
revision—a task that will, however, require years of concentration, for his
publications are not only extremely numerous, but scattered through a wide
range of publications in almost all European languages.”

A fortnight later the Editor had to announce the following fateful
extract from the late Professor’s Will, of which he had been favoured with
a translation :—

“ My herbarium and my botanical library, my instruments, collection of
seeds, &c., accrue to the Imperial Hof Museum in Vienna, under the
condition that the preserved Orchids and drawings of Orchids shall not be
exhibited before twenty-five years from the date of my death have elapsed.
Until this time my collection shall be preserved in sealed cases. In the
event of the Vienna Institute declining to observe these conditions, the

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 275

collection falls under the same conditions to the Botanical Garden at
Upsala. Should the last-mentioned Institute decline the legacy, then to the
Grayean Herbarium in Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. If declined
by that Institute, then to the Jardin des Plantes, at Paris, but always
under the same conditions, viz., of being sealed up for twenty-five years, in
order that the inevitable destruction of the costly collection, resulting from
the present craze for Orchids, may be avoided.”

In commenting on the same it was remarked: ‘‘ The subjoined extract
from the will of the late Professor Reichenbach . . . will be received
with profound regret. The late Professor had at all times the fullest and
freest access to Dr. Lindley’s Herbarium in the lifetime of that botanist,
and subsequently for the last twenty or more years at Kew. The resources
of that establishment were always at his disposal, while from hundreds of
Orchid growers in this country he received freely and continuously material
for his researches. The notes and memoranda on living plants received,
directly or indirectly, from this office alone must have been very consider-
able, even if they did not form the bulk of the material at his disposal. It
would be affectation to pretend that we do not receive the announcement
‘we have now to make with chagrin and sorrow. The future task of
Orchidists in this country is, by this step, rendered peculiarly laborious and
perplexing.”

The article concluded: ‘‘ Though we may deeply regret that Professor
Reichenbach has clouded his memory with an act which shows equal
‘distrust of the generosity of his fellow botanists and of the strength of his
own scientific reputation, we may rest assured that the scientific study of
Orchids in this country will not be arrested, but that the rich material
which this country, more than any other, affords will not be neglected,
notwithstanding Professor Reichenbach’s ungenerous attempt to paralyse
its study.”

The Journal of Botany also contained a long biographical notice, and
remarked: ‘‘ His knowledge was as unique as is the means by which he has
succeeded in rendering his material temporarily, if not permanently, useless
to those who should continue his work. . . . He was universally
consulted on all matters relating to his vote Order ; and it is to his
correspondence that his herbarium owes its value, containing, as it does,
almost every specimen that he had ever had sent him, with sketches
showing the structure, and copious notes; the whole being arranged with
scrupulous care and neatness. . . Tous in this country he has for more
than twenty years been a familiar figure—coming over for a stay often of
many weeks, and settling down at Kew, where at one time he thought of
permanently residing, so as to be in close proximity to the herbarium,
which contains Lindley’s type-collection of Orchids. . . The news of

276 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913-

his death . . . came upon us as-a surprise; the provisions of his Will
have not only astonished the scientific world, but have attracted the
attention of those to whom the disposition of a herbarium has never
presented any feature of interest. Mr. Hewett Watson, it will be
remembered, labouring under some temporary annoyance, threatened to
make a funeral pyre of his collections; Reichenbach’s disposition of his
collections is, at any rate for the present, scarcely, if at all, less mischievous.
than this. . . The bequest, thus limited, has been accepted at Vienna,
and thus, for twenty-five years at least—even if the plants at the end of
that period are in a consultable condition—botanists are deprived of the
use of this invaluable collection. The result of this provision must be to
impair its value, whilst its usefulness will be reduced to the narrowest
limits.”

In an Obituary notice in the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (drawn up
before the disposition of his herbarium was known) it was remarked: “‘ He
was jealous to excess of any supposed encroachment on his special preserve ;
his resentment of the same was characteristic, and even amusing to those
who were merely onlookers and were not exposed to the brunt of his
attacks. During the last thirty years, that is since Lindley ceased to labour
on these plants, Reichenbach has been the sponsor of an innumerable host
of new species, varieties, and hybrids; every scrap or drawing oF
memorandum was carefully hoarded for his herbarium. This, therefore,
has become the key to his life-long labours, and the destination of it will be
eagerly awaited ; a careful working of it by competent hands will be needed
to clear up the many puzzles in his descriptions, which of late years had
assumed an esoteric character, presuming an almost equal knowledge of
plants to that possessed by the author. The state of his herbarium is also
quite unknown, for during long years past no botanist has been permitted
to have even a glimpse of the collection. . . . At his last visit to this
country Reichenbach was looking forward to his retirement from the
professional chair, with prolonged visits to Kew, and the preparation of a
projected ‘Index Reichenbachianus,’ which was to give a much-needed
guide to the widely-scattered descriptions of species and varieties; but this
last, if even begun, is unfinished.”

The following extract from the Orchid Album is interesting, because it
affords evidence on a point respecting which doubt has been expressed =
‘We are extremely sorry to find by the published extract from his Will
that his herbarium is not only lost to England, but that it really becomes @
dead letter to the Orchid world by being shut up for twenty-five years.
The Professor told us, when visiting us some time ago, that it was his
intention to leave his herbarium to this country, and we sincerely regret
that any English Orchid-growers should have so bitterly aggrieved him as

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 277

to cause him to have altered his mind and to shut up his numberless
specimens, drawings, and copious notes from everyone interested in this
beautiful and popular order of plants.—B.S.W.”

The doubt alluded to appeared in the Journal of Botany, where the
Editor remarks: “It is difficult to understand on what grounds it should
have been assumed, as seems to have been the case, that the collection
would come to England.” The criticism was more particularly directed to
a remark in the Saturday Review: “It has been understood by all the
universe that . . . _his gigantic and priceless collections would be left
to Kew,” and of this it is observed, ‘‘a more misleading statement it would
be difficult to find.” The following, however, has been written in the Kew
copy: ‘‘ Reichenbach told me more than once that his collections would go
to Kew; but lately he was strongly prejudiced against those who had
taken up the study of Orchids in this country.—W. B. H.”

The foregoing sufficiently indicates the importance of the Reichenbachian
Herbarium and the problematical nature of its contents, but if further
evidence is necessary the reader is referred to the history of Masdevallia
Lowii and Catasetum Bungerothii given at pp. 335, 336 of our third volume,
where the question was asked “ whether, in order to secure priority for a
name, it is sufficient for an author to write a description which does not
apply, refuse to let anyone see the specimen during his lifetime, and finally
lock it up for a quarter of a century after his death ?”

A comment by Reichenbach himself is eloquent in this connection.
When describing Microstylis calophylla he had some difficulty with an
incomplete diagnosis, and remarked: ‘‘ Authors should do more than secure
to themselves the right of priority . . . by such incomplete
diagnoses. Not only should a careful ascinaae be taken, but great care
should be taken to help posterity in discriminating the species. Therefore
the specimen, or those specimens, which furnished the evidence for the
establishment of the species should be distinctly marked as ‘the type of
my species.’ I now always do this in my collection. I regard this as a
fidei commisum for my lifetime that that will have to be distinctly kept
within reach of the men of science after my death.” Comment would be
superfluous.

Evidence of another kind could also be given, but we will conclude with
a paragraph that can only be cited in its entirety from our own pages.
When Reichenbach described Selenipedium Boissierianum he remarked:
*“*We know of only onespecimen . . . and it gives us much
pleasure to dedicate this beautiful plant, ceobably unique in the collections
of Europe, to its proprietor, M. Edmund Boissier, to whom we are under so
great obligations.’ Commenting on this M. William Barbey, the present
possessor of the Boissier Herbarium, remarks: ‘ Unfortunately that unique

278 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

specimen was never returned by Reichenbach to its proprietor. It lies
buried with the rest of the Orchids for twenty-five years, along with other
uniques which had been entrusted to him.’ . . . Perhaps facts may
yet come to light which will suggest a reason for acheaback S preposterous.
act, which no one, not even its eccentric author, has yet satisfactorily
explained.”

Some interesting problems evidently await the opening of the Reichen-
bachian Herbarium.

For the loan of the block used to illustrate this article we are indebted
to the courtesy of the Editor of the Gardeners’ Chronicle.

LAELIOCATTLEYA CLARKII.

A FLOWER of an interesting hybrid has been sent from the collection of E.
F. Clark, Esq., Evershot, Dorset, of which the parentage is given as Cattleya
picturata X Lelia purpurata, the former the plant noted at page 204 of our
sixth volume a3 a natural hybrid between C. intermedia and C. Leopoldii,
the latter a fine dark form with some purple veining in the petals. The
cross was made in 1898, and the seedling, which is said to have been
‘more than once divided,’ has now bloomed. The flower sent may be
described as most like L.-c. Schiileriana in the shape and colour of the
sepals and petals—which are white with a trace of purple veining—but
nearer L.-c. elegans in the strongly three-lobed dark purple lip. From
its composition it should naturally be intermediate between the two, and it
may be added that the intercrossing of L.-c. Schilleriana and L.-c. elegans
would yield a hybrid of identical composition.

The appearance of this hybrid raises a very interesting question.
Cattleya intermedia, C. Leopoldii, and Lelia purpurata grow together in
South Brazil, and yield the three natural hybrids mentioned above, all of
which have also been raised artificially. The two Leliocattleyas are known
to be very variable, and the question is how far this may be due to secondary
crossing in a wild state. Two secondary hybrids have been recorded,
namely, L.-c. Phillip Stokes (L.-c. elegans X C. Leopoldii) and L.-¢.
Queen Alexandra (L.-c. Schilleriana X L. purpurata), concerning which
“ Argutus ” remarks: ‘‘ The wonder is, considering the length of time that
Leliocattleya elegans, Schilleriana, and Lelia purpurata have been
imported and cultivated, that the presence of this and the preceding hybrid
has not previously been known or suspected, as it is quite unreasonable to
suppose that as we have natural hybrids between Cattleya Leopoldii, Lelia
purpurata, and Cattleya intermedia, those hybrids must in some cases, and
as the two undermentioned now prove, have crossed between themselves
and with the parent species. There can be no doubt as to the correctness
of the parents ascribed, as fortunately flowers of the true L.-c. Schilleriana

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 279

were at hand for comparison’ (Garden, 1902, ii. p. 182). The parentage is,
of course, only an inference, but if these two secondary hybrids occur there
may be others, in fact twelve secondary combinations are possible, four of
which have already been made in gardens, and now we have this additional
one from Mr. Clark, which we have not been able to identify with any of
the forms now referred to L.-c. elegans and L.-c. Schilleriana. The matter
has already been dealt with in our pages (O.R., x. pp. 311, 312), and we
may add that we are still without further information about the two
secondary hybrids said to occur wild.

SIMPLIFICATION OF MENDELIAN FORMUL&.,
PROFESSOR W. E. CAsTLE, in a recent issue of the American Naturalist (pp.
170-182) expresses the need for a_ simplification of the Mendelian
terminology now that Mendel’s original conception of segregating dominant
and recessive characters existing in contrasted pairs has been replaced by
the ingenious presence and absence hypothesis. Mendel’s “A” was a
round form of pea, his ‘‘a”’ a wrinkled ; his ‘‘ B” a yellow-seeded pea, his
“6” a green-seeded. But the significance of these terms has now changed.
A still means a round pea, but a is simply a not-round pea; it may or may
not be wrinkled. Likewise B is still a yellow-seeded pea, but 6 is nothing
but a not-yellow pea; it may or may not begreen. For all that b signifies now,
the pea may be blue, violet, indigo, or carmine. The small letters now
mean nothing, yet we read of repulsions or associations between a and B,
or between a and 6. Think of it! How can something be coupled with
nothing ? or nothing be inseparably bound up with nothing? ‘It seems
to me the consequent effect on inheritance is absolutely nothing! We need
to abandon the dual terminology, using only one set of symbols, and in a
single significance. The duplicate set of symbols is the chief cause of the
present confusion. The physiological condition which produces one colour
is as real as that which produces another, and no mere negation; it is
simply different. There are many instances on record in which one and the
same character may behave at one time as a dominant, at another time as
a recessive. Different gradations of colour may result merely from
quantitative variations in cell constituents and consequent activities,
nothing being lost. With a single system every symbol is significant,
and its dominant or recessive character is indicated by the symbol whether
large or small. The original or wild type need not be described in terms of
its mutations; it is simply written normal. New forms arise through
recombination of simple mutations, and each mutation as it arises should
be given some suitable descriptive name, the initial or other significant
letter of which shall be its symbol. The system would be capable of
indefinite expansion without constant remodelling. Mendelians can easily

280 THE ORCHID REVIEW. _ (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

simplify their formule and make themselves more readily intelligible to
themselves and to others. This simplified terminology commits one to no
physiological theory ; it simply states facts. We need not assume that the
wild form contains a number of factors which by mutation have been lost,
unless we choose to do so, but are free to suppose that merely a readjust-
ment hastaken place. The author concludes: ‘‘ That terminology evidently
is most desirable which states demonstrated facts most clearly and simply,
and makes fewest assumptions as to their explanation. Otherwise the
investigator may be led to conclusions based on his terminology rather than
his facts, and this can lead only to disaster.”

ORCHIDS AT KEW.

A fine plant of the brilliant Renanthera coccinea, ‘“‘ the Chinese Air-
plant,” is now flowering at Kew, producing a panicle with six branches and
over 100 scarlet flowers, and making a fine show. A specimen of Calanthe
Dominyi, the first artificial hybrid Orchid, is bearing fifteen spikes of lilac
flowers, and a group of Dendrobium Dearei arranged with plants of the
allied D. Sanderz and D. Schuetzei also make a good display. Stanhopea
tigrina, S. indora, and the distinct S. ecornuta have also flowered well, and
a Gongora recently brought from Ecuador by Mr. W. Fox has been identi-
fied with G. grossa, Rchb. f., only known from deseription. It has flowered
very freely. A plant of the rare Oncidium Warneri is producing a raceme
of nine flowers, with a four-lobed yellow lip, and the sepals and petals
greenish striped with rose. A plant of Ccelia macrostachya is bearing six
dense racemes of rose-coloured flowers, making a fine display. It is grown
in a compost of three-parts fibrous loam and one part osmunda fibre.
Good drainage is essential, and at the present season occasional waterings
of weak liquid cow manure are beneficial. In the same house a number of
Sobralia Veitchii are making a fine show, together with S. Amesiana and
its two parents, S. xantholeuca and S. Wilsonii, also a plant of S. Lowi.
S. Veitchii seems to be very variable, some forms being white with a yellow
throat to the lip, others having a rosy tinge in the sepals and petals. A
plant of the rare Platanthera iantha must also be mentioned. In the
Warm house a small group of the Swan’s neck Orchids are very interesting,
and include Cycnoches maculatum, chlorochilon, and Loddigesii, the latter
the original species of the genus, and showing well the long arching
character of the column from which the genus takes its name. Here also is
a good plant of the very distinct Listrostachys forcipata, with short racemes
of pellucid white flowers, which remain long in perfection. It has the
habit of Oncidium iridifolium, and is very attractive. These are only a few
of the many interesting species now in flower at Kew, and the showy
species of the season are also well represented. H.L.S.

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 281

CATTLEYA FABIA VAR, SUNSET.
AT the Royal Horticultural Society’s Show of autumn-blooming Orchids,
held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, on
November 5th last, two handsome varieties of Cattleya Fabia were
exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr.
Mr. Alexander), namely, Sunset and gloriosa, an Award of Merit being
given in each case. The former is here figured—or rather half the plant,
for there was a second equally fine inflorescence. It is a very fine, deep

Fig. 58. CATTLEYA FABIA VAR. SUNSET.

rose-coloured form, and is remarkable for the large amount of buff yellow on
the lip. The variety gloriosa was also very richly coloured, and had a
broad purple-crimson lip, with some yellow veining in the throat. It may
be remembered that at this exhibition Sir George Holford staged fifty
plants of Cattleya Fabia, bearing an aggregate of over 260 flowers. They
were obtained from two different crosses, one lot being remarkable for the
brilliant colours, the other being lighter and with more yellow in the throat.

282 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

Cattleya Fabia was originally raised by Messrs. James Veitch & Sons from
C. labiata 2 and C. Dowiana aurea 3 , and received an Award of Merit from
the R.H.S. in November, 1894, when it flowered for the first time.

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR SEPTEMBER.

By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
SHOULD the favourable conditions experienced for some time continue, the
temperatures advised in previous Calendars may be maintained, but should
the outside conditions change, and wet and cold weather prevail, the
temperatures may be allowed to fall a degree or two in all departments.

SHADING.—During the present month the plants should be inured to as
much light and sun as possible. The blinds should only be used whenever
the sun is powerful, and likely to scorch the plants. By these means the
plants will become ripened, and produce more and better flowers than if
grown under shady conditions.

ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE must be gradually reduced as the days shorten
and the sun has less power, but in those houses where plants are growing
a genial atmosphere may be maintained for the present month.

VENTILATION at this season is of the greatest importance, as air
combined with light is essential in the important process of ripening the
newly-made growths. A soft, ill-ripened plant cannot withstand the
changeable conditions of the winter months as well as one thoroughly
matured.

WaTERING.—The application of water to the roots will now require
much consideration, as those plants that have completed their growths will
only require sufficient to keep them plump and healthy, whilst those that
are in full growth must have water applied to them whenever they become
dry.
WINTER QUARTERS.—With the advent of September we must prepare
for the winter months, and the plants should be placed in their winter
quarters, where a large number of plants have to be dealt with and room is
limited ; this requires some forethought, so that the plants should not be
handled more than is necessary. The glass should be thoroughly cleansed
from all kinds of dirt and insect pests. Those plants which are partial to
certain positions should always be placed in them.

CYPRIPEDIUMS that are showing for flower should have their scapes
neatly tied to stakes as soon as they become long enough, as, if they become
twisted, they lose much of their beauty and utility. Any plants of the
summer-flowering section that are in need of new rooting material may
have attention as they pass out of bloom, using a compost as previously
advised.

DENDROBIUMS.—The season has been most favourable for the cultivation

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID: REVIEW. 283

of these plants. In the deciduous section those species and hybrids which
produce their flowers early in the new year are now rapidly finishing their
season’s growth. When this is completed, which may be determined by
the end leaf of each pseudobulb being fully developed, they must be placed
in a drier atmosphere, and receive water at the roots in much less quantities,
and only sufficient given them to keep them from shrivelling. An excess of
moisture at the roots of these plants is as detrimental as a parched over-
dry one. Any plants that are still actively growing should have liberal
treatment, and be induced to reach the resting stage, so that they may also
be treated as advised. Plants of D. Phalznopsis that are pushing up their
flower spikes may have water afforded them whenever they become dry, but
when their spikes are removed much less will suffice. In those districts
where fogs prevail in.the autumn it will be advisable to push the plants
into bloom as early as possible, thus avoiding the pernicious effects upon
their beautiful flowers. D. formosum is also pushing up its flower spikes,
and requires similar treatment to D. Phalenopsis. Both require all the
light possible at this season. The evergreen section, such as D. thyrsiflorum,
densiflorum, Farmeri, &c., as they complete their season’s growth, should
receive similar treatment to that afforded the deciduous species.

CaTTLEYAs, L&LIAS, AND THEIR HYBRIDS.—During the present month
such plants as C. Warscewiczii, Warneri, Hardyana, and others that have
passed the flowering stage, will commence to push roots from the base of
their pseudobulbs, and any that are in need of new rooting material may
have attention. Lzlia tenebrosa, L. purpurata, Lzliocattleya elegans,
and their numerous varieties and hybrids will now cammence to grow
vigorously, and may receive similar treatment, if necessary. Any Cattleyas
that are producing new roots may be repotted’at this season, but care
should be taken that only sufficient water is applied to the new compost to
prevent the plant from shrivelling. The new roots will soon enter the new
compost and re-establish themselves, if kept on the dry side. Those
Cattleyas which flower in the autumn, such as C. labiata, C. Bowringiana,
and many hybrids will have finished their season’s growths and be pushing
up flower spikes, and these should only have sufficient water to keep them
plump and healthy, as, if they get water in excess, it will start them into
growth again, and their flowers will be puny or may turn black and fall off.
An excess of water at this season may mean the loss of a valuable plant, but,
still, the other extreme must be avoided.

Cuysis.—C. aurea, bractescens, Limminghei, levis, and the hybrids C.
Chelsonii and Sedenii should be suspended at the warm end of the Cattleya
house, or any similar position, so as to enable them to finish their growths
quickly, and until these are completed, and the leaves commence to change
colour, the plants will require water at the roots whenever they appear dry.

284 THE ORCHID REVIEW. ‘{Seprember, 1913.

When well matured they should be placed with the Dendrobiums in the
resting-house, and treated as advised for that genus.

MASDEVALLIAS.—The robust-growing species should have attention
during the early weeks of the present month, should they require new
rooting material. Although these plants are not grown to the extent they
formerly were, there is no more beautiful object in our Cool houses than a
well-grown specimen of any one of them. Their treatment has been fully
dealt with in former numbers.

ODoNTOGLOssuMs.—The repotting of these plants should be pushed on
with, as it should be the aim of every cultivator as far as possible to get
them all done as early as possible, so that they may become re-established
before the winter sets in. All should be made clean and comfortable before
that season arrives.

ONCIDIUMS are usually represented by plants in flower, no matter what
the time of year, especially if well grown, and how often a well-grown
specimen, even of a most ordinary species, appeals to us! One very pretty
and useful species now in flower is O. obryzatum, its long and much-
branched spikes carrying large quantities of pretty golden yellow flowers,
spotted with light brown, and this at a season when Orchid flowers are not
over-plentiful in most collections. The plants belonging to the O. crispum
section, namely, O. Forbesii, curtum, Gardneri, Marshallianum, and O.
crispum itself, although not flattering to present-day Orchid growers, are
most useful subjects, even if we cannot keep them in a robust condition
over a series of years. O. Marshallianum produces its flowers during late
spring and early summer, whilst the others display their beautiful sprays
during late summer and autumn. O. varicosum is one of the most beautiful
and free-flowering Orchids known, and those plants that are at the present
time producing flower spikes should be placed well up to the light, the
spikes, as they become long enough, being neatly staked up to prevent
accidents. O. ornithorrhynchum and its beautiful variety album, with
others that have been growing during the summer months in the Cool
house, will be better taken and placed in a cool position in the Intermediate
house for the winter months. Oncidiums, after flowering, should be rested,
as they require a decided rest, but on no account should they be allowed to
shrivel.

MILTonIAs.—Continue to repot the plants of this genus as advised last
month, but any that do not reach the desired condition during the present
month will be better held over and potted with the late-flowering kinds in
the early spring. The same remarks apply to any of the hybrids which
have produced their flowers late, and have not yet commenced to grow.

ANGRECUMS.—These and similar plants, such as Aérides, Vandas,
Saccolabiums, and other epiphytic inmates of the Warm house, may now

a 4
EE

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 285

have the water supply at the roots slightly reduced, also much less moisture
in the atmosphere will suffice. Too much water at this season may be the
means of the plants receiving a check, whereby many valuable leaves may
be lost, which will greatly disfigure an otherwise beautiful specimen. These
plants should be gradually inured to more light and air on all favourable
occasions. In order to carry our plants safely through the winter months
it is necessary that they should be prepared by consolidating their growths
as much as possible, and although the present season has been most
favourable for fine, clean, healthy growths, we should not forget that we
may have a severe winter before us.

VANDA C@RULEA will now be in its beauty, and where a house can be
devoted to its culture is a most delightful subject. As the plants pass out
of bloom they should be rested, receiving air on all favourable opportunities
and plenty of light at all seasons. The now-plentiful Renanthera
Imschootiana succeeds under the same conditions as V. coerulea, and this
bright and useful summer-flowering Orchid is a most valuable subject for
summer shows, and where cut flowers are required in quantity is much
appreciated.

TRICHOPILIAS.—The different species which flower in the summer
months, as T. Backhouseana, suavis, coccinea and others may have new
rooting material, should they be in need of it. They succeed best grown in
shallow pans, suspended from the roof of the Intermediate house, and a
similar compost to that used for Cattleyas will answer their requirements.

GENERAL REMARKS.—Once more we have reached that season of the
year when our thonghts and attention must be given to the safe keeping of
the plants through the winter months. No detail should be considered too
trivial to claim our attention, as all these small matters make for success.
Everything that forethought can suggest, such as the heating apparatus, on
which so much depends, should be placed in an efficient state of repair, as it
is at the most critical periods that breakdowns occur. The roofs of the houses
should also be made watertight, as a valuable plant is of more consequence
than a few panes of glass. In smoky districts the roof glass of the houses
should be made scrupulously clean, to admit all the light possible, as light is
an essential factor in the cultivation of all plants under artificial conditions.

——»-0<e—__
SOCIETIES.
RoyAL HORTICULTURAL.
THE usual fortnightly meeting was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall,
Vincent Square, Westminster, on August 12th, when there was a rather
small display of Orchids, and the awards consisted of four medals, two
Awards of Merit, and one Cultural Commendation.
Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),

286 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

and Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, F. J. Hanbury, W. H.
Hatcher, G. Hunter, A. Dye, J. Charlesworth, A. McBean, W. H. White,
S. W. Flory, W. Bolton, de B. Crawshay, R. A. Rolfe, and Sir Harry J.
Veitch.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, staged a choice group,
including well-flowered examples of Cattleya Dowiana aurea, W
Hardyana, Parthenia, and Rex, Brassocattleya Joan (B. Perrinii X C.
Warscewiczii), a pretty white hybrid with rosy spots on the lip, the hand-
some Odontoglossum Woodroffez (Rossii rubescens X Queen Alexandra),
O. Helen, richly blotched with violet on a white ground, and a deep purple
form of O. eximium (Silver Flora Medal).

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), staged
an interesting and varied group, including several good examples of Cattleya
Source d’Or, C. Dowiana aurea, suavior, Atalanta, and Gaskelliana, C.
Armstrongiz X intricata, the distinct Stanhopea saccata, a well-flowered
Promenea xanthina, Maxillaria grandiflora, Angrecum Scottianum,
Miltonia vexillaria and Bleuana, Odontoglossum aspidorhinum and
Uroskinneri, the striking Chondrorhyncha Chestertoni, Cypripedium
Baron Schréder, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

De Barri Crawshay, Esq., Rosefield, Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Stables), sent a
fine example of Odontoglossum Queen Alexandra, and a good Odontioda
Leeana (C. Neetzliana x O. spectabile), having vermilion-red flowers with
a lilac-coloured apex to the lip.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham (gr. Mr. Black), sent
good examples of Cattleya Pittiana and Caduceus, with ten good
Odontiodas, including Charlesworthii, Devosiana, Thwaitesii, Leeana, and
Sandere, forming a very brilliant little group.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including fine examples of Odontoglossum armainvillierense xanthotes,
Rolfez, epicasta, O. Clytie xX crispum, and others, the handsome Miltonia
Charlesworthii, M. vexillaria robusta, the small but richly-coloured M. v.
superba, Cattleya Fauna (Chamberlainiana x Hardyana), a handsome
novelty having yellow flowers with some purple on the lip, the rare
Stanhopea convoluta, Cycnoches chlorochilon, Dendrobium Sandere,
Cypripedium leyburnense, the large-flowered Cryptophoranthus Dayanus,
and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, staged a good group, including
a fine form of Vanda coerulea, good examples of Cattleya Dowiana aurea
and Rothschildiana, Dendrobium Dearei and Sandere, several finely-
grown Odontoglossum crispum, and about a dozen Odontiodas, including
Bradshawie, Diana, Charlesworthii, . Lambeauiana, Thwaitesii, and
keighleyensis (Silver Banksian Medal),

‘SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 287

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, sent a well-flowered
plant of the handsome Dendrobium Hookerianum, having deep yellow
flowers with two dark blotches on the broad deeply fringed lip; also a fine
hybrid from Lzeliocattleya George Woodhams and Cattleya Rothschildiana,
having rich purple flowers with a dark claret-coloured lip.

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, sent a well-flowered
Cattleya Atalanta, and Leliocattleya Ophir E. V. Low’s var.; having
nearly white sepals and ‘petals and‘a rose-purple lip.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged an womaiia
little group, including Lelia crispa with eleven flowers, good examples of
Miltonia Phalzenopsis, M. Roezlii, and M. R. alba, the handsome Oncidium
Lanceanum and O. Papilio, a i Mendeélii, and a fine Cclogyne
pandurata.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, sent Eaelecaliene Phoenix var.
King George (L.-c. Greenwoodii x C. Dowiana aurea), a handsome hybrid,
having cream-white sepals and petals tinged and veined with purple, and a
dark maroon-purple lip with some yellow lines in the throat.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

L#LIOCATTLEYA Urania (L.-c. Ingramii X C. Mantinii).—A very fine
rich purple flower, of excellent shape, — a very broad, darker an
Exhibited by Messrs. J. & A. McBean.

L#LIOCATTLEYA WELLESLEYI VAR. FLAMBEAU (C. Warscewiczii X
L.-c. Martinetii).—A large and very richly-coloured form, having bright
rose-purple sepals and petals, and a broad purple-crimson lip, with some
yellow in the throat and a much crisped margin. Exhibited by E. H.
‘Davidson, Esq.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

CRYPTOPHORANTHUS LEHMANNII.—To Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., for
a very fine plant, bearing about 150 flowers, which are considerably smaller
‘than in C. Dayana.

At the meeting held on August 26th there was a good display of Orchids,
including several choice groups, and the awards consisted of six medals,
two First-class Certificates, three Awards of Merit, and one Cultural
Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), and
‘Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, A. Dye, W. H. White, Sir
Harry J. Veitch, R. A. Rolfe, F. J. Hanbury, A. McBean, T. Armstrong,
W. Cobb, J. E. Shill, W. Bolton, R. Brooman White, and Stuart Low. ~

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), received a
Silver Banksian Medal for an interesting ‘little group, including Odonto-
glossum Thompsonianum, O. Dioscorides (spectabile xX Ruckerianum

288 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913.

Pittianum), Cattleya Source d’Or, Miltonia Bleuana, and vexillaria superba,
Brassocattleya Thwaitesii, Oncidium Wentworthianum, Lzlia monophylla,
Cypripedium Baron Schréder, Leliocattleya Perdita (C. granulosa
Schofieldiana x L.-c. Tydea), a pretty Lzliocattleya from C. intricata and
L.-c. Ingramii, and several other interesting things.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
sent a fine plant of Brassia brachiata bearing racemes of eight and nine
flowers, and another of Pleurothallis velaticaulis, with many racemes of
light green flowers.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent Cattleya
Hardyana Goodsoniz, a form with light yellow sepals and petals and a
richly-coloured lip.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., Burford, Dorking (gr. Mr. White), sent a
plant of Sophrocattleya Chamberlainiana with three flowers.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Odonto-
glossum Euterpe Ashtead Park var.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group,
including well-flowered examples of the handsome Leeliocattleya George
Woodhams, a fine L.-c. Schroder, L.-c. bletchleyensis, a handsome L.-c.
Greenwoodii X C. Warscewiczii, C. Rothschildiana x L.-c. George
Woodhams, Cattleya Hardyana, Warscewiczii, and Mrs. Pitt, Odontioda
Seymouriz (Charlesworthii x Bradshawiz), a handsome crimson form
with much yellow on the lip, with examples of both parents, and other good
things (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including two
good Anguloa Cliftonii, Bollea Lalindei, the handsome Vanda Sanderiana,
Rhynchostylis retusa, a well-flowered Lycaste hybrida (Deppei x Skinneri),
Catastetum tabulare, Lelia monophylla, Oncidium Sanderz, Dendrobium
ciliatum, Ancistrochilus Thomsonianus, Odontonia Farnesiana (O. Edwardii
Xx M. Warscewiczii), with a panicle of purple flowers, Odontioda Devosiana,
Brassocattleya Pluto, Stanhopea peruviana, Cattleya Muelleri and Davisii,
a few good Leeliocattleyas, Odontoglossums, Cypripediums, and others
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a very fine group,
including two good examples of Lzliocattleya Nysa, Gertrude, callisto-
glossa, and bletchleyensis, Lelia Jongheana x C. Parthenia, most like the
former but without keels on the lip’s disc, Brassocattleya Ilione and Thetis,
Cattleya Dowiana aurea, Harrisoniana and Hardyana, Odontoglossum
Harryanum, grande and crispum, Cypripediums, and other good things
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including a pretty hybrid from Cochlioda Neetzliana and Odontoglossum

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 289

hastilabium, and having elongated crimson red sepals and petals, anda
four-lobed yellow lip, Zygopetalum Sanderz, several fine Vanda ccerulea,
Odontoglossum Pheebe, Brassocattleya Maroniz and Moneta, Dendrobium
Phalznopsis, Miltonia Roezlii and var. alba, Paphinia cristata, some brilliant
Lzliocattleyas St.-Gothard, Eurydice, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a good group of Cattleyas and
others, in which we noted examples of Cattleya Gaskelliana and var. alba,
several C. Dowiana aurea, Leopoldii, Thurgoodiana and Hardyana, C.
McMastersiz, a fine plant of Cypripedium A. de Lairesse, Leliocattleya
rubens and bletchleyensis, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

BRASSOCATLELIA THE BARONESS (B.-c. Leemannize X L.-c. Ophir.—A
very beautiful hybrid, having well-expanded, light yellow flowers of great
substance, with some crimson markings on the lip. Exhibited by Baron
Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green (gr. Mr. Shill).

ODONTONIA BRUGENSIS VAR. EILEEN (M. vexillaria x O. Edwardii).—A
beautiful hybrid, bearing an inflorescence of six well-expanded purple
flowers, with a yellow crest to the lip. Exhibited by J. Gurney Fowler,
Esq., Glebelands, S. Woodford (gr. Mr. Davis).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA HARDYANA VAR. Mrs. WATERS BUTLER (Dowiana aurea X
Warscewiczii).-—A large and handsome form, having the sepals and petals
well mottled, and a very large amount of clear yellow on the sides of the
lip. Exhibited by Waters Butler, Esq. (gr. Mr. Jones).

LA&LIOCATTLEYA EtTRICckK (L.-c. bletchleyensis X C. Dowiana aurea).—
A large and handsome hybrid, having lilac-purple sepals and petals, and an
intense purple lip. Exhibited by Messrs. James Veitch & Sons.

L#LIOCATTLEYA MARQUIS DE WAVRIN ORCHIDHURST VAR..—A large
and handsome form, bearing two purple flowers with a darker lip
Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

ORNITHIDIUM SoOpHRONITIS.—To Mr. J. Collier, gardener to. Sir
Jeremiah Colman, Bart., for a very fine plant, about a foot across, and
covered with its brilliant orange-scarlet flowers.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.
AT the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on June 5th, 1913,
the members of Committee present were:—Messrs. Z. A. Ward (in the
Chair), H. Thorp, J. Evans, D. McLeod, Dr. Hartley, J. Bamber, C.
Parker, G. Weatherby, A. J. Keeling, W. Shackleton, A. G. Ellwood, J.
Lupton, J. Cypher, and H. Arthur (Secretary).
R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), was awarded a Large

290 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

Silver-gilt Medal for a fine group, including Odontoglossum Jasper,
Fascinator, and Leeana, ardentissimum and crispum xanthotes, Odontioda
Charlesworthii, some fine Miltonias, Cattleya Mossiz delicata, and Robert
de Wavrin, Leliocattleya Aphrodite, Fascinator, and G. S. Ball, Cypri-
pedium bellatulum, Queen of Spain and R. Ashworth, Godefroye Kaiser
Wilhelm, niveum Ashland’s var., callosum Sandere, grande atratum, and
others.

A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), staged a nice group,
to which a Large Silver Medal was awarded. Amongst the Odontoglossums
were crispum Graireianum, Lucie-Mariz, Capartianum, A. J. Balfour,
moortebeekiense, and Virgin Queen, Miltonia vexillaria Vine House var.,
Cattleya Schroedere Vine House var., Lelia purpurata, and a fine plant of
Cypripedium Rothschildianum, carrying five fully-expanded flowers on one
stem, a Cultural Certificate with Bronze Medal being awarded to the
gardener.

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), staged Phalznopsis
amabilis Rimestadiana, Odontoglossum crispum, white and blotched, and
fine examples of Cypripedium niveum.

Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr. Weatherby), sent an Odonto-
glossum seedling with seventy-four flowers, and QO. armainvillierense
xanthotes, a Cultural Certificate and Bronze Medal being awarded to the
gardener.

Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), sent Cattleya
Mossiz Beardwood var., and a fine variety of Miltonia vexillaria.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a very fine group,
to which a Large Silver-gilt Medal was awarded. Amongst the host of
good things must be specially mentioned, Cymbidium Lowianum concolor;
Cattleyas in variety, including C. Mossiz alba, Leliocattleya Martinetii
Orchidhurst var., Brassocattleya Veitchii splendens, Lelia purpurata
Orchidhurst var. ; a nice collection of Odontiodas, containing several new
hybrids ; Miltonias of the vexillaria type, Masdevallia Harryana, and others.

Messrs. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, were awarded a Silver Medal for
a fine group, including Lzliocattleya Aphrodite, Canhamiana, and
Fascinator, Brassocattleya Veitchii and Triune, Cattleya Mossiz, Skinneri
Temple’s var., Miltonia vexillaria, Bleuana nobilior, Odontoglossum
eximium and Lambeauianum, Thunia Veitchiana and Oncidium pulchellum.

The Liverpool Orchid & Nursery Co., Gateacre, were awarded a Silver
Medal for a group of unnamed Leeliocattleyas, amongst which were several
good varieties, well-grown plants of L.-c. Canhamiana and Dominiana,
Miltonia vexillaria and a few Cypripediums, including bellatulum album and
Godefroyz Sunset, making a nice display. tes

Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, staged a nice mixed group, to

deticieesresk "Rasa

SEPTEMBER, I913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 291

which a Silver Medal was awarded, the Miltonias of the vexillaria section
being very fine, and a Cultural Certificate was voted for one specimen.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, staged Cattleya Mossize Reineckeana,
grandis, Pintadeau and Mrs. E. Ashworth, Leliocattleya Canhamiana
Duchess and Eudora superba.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged Odontoglossum
splendens, Marietta, and eximium.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

Coelogyne pandurata Orchidhurst var., a very fine variety, with fourteen

flowers on one spike, from Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.
AWARD OF MERIT.

Odontoglossum Vuylstykei Ashlands var., and O. Vertumis, both from
K. Ashworth, Esq.

At the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on July 3rd
last, the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in
the Chair), Messrs. J. Bamber, Dr. Hartley, A. J. Keeling, D. McLeod, C.
Parker, W. Shackleton, P. Smith, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward, G. Weatherby,
A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), staged a splendid group,
to which a Silver-gilt Medal was awarded. It contained Odontoglossum
excellens, Harryanum, Pluto, ardentissimum, Fletcheri, amabile, Pescatorei,
Lindeni, Odontioda rosefieldensis, Bradshawize, Miltonia Hyeana, Bleuana
Tosea, vexillaria Fairy Queen, Queen Alexandra, and Lelia tenebrosa
Walton Grange var., Lzliocattleya Canhamiana, Cattleya Mossiz Wageneri,
Masdevallia Reichenbachiana; Trichopilia Hennisii; Cypripedium callosum
Sander, bellatulum album, and Godefroyz var. Sunset.

A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), was also awarded
a Silver-gilt Medal for an excellent group, including Odontoglossum
crispum Hoper and Diadem, eximium Warburtonianum, Thompsonianum,
and others, Odontioda chelseiensis, Cattleya Mossiz Arnoldiana Smee’s
var., Lelia tenebrosa Victor Warburton and Walton Grange var., Lelio-
cattleya tyntesfieldensis, and Canhamiana Fire King, Miltonia vexillaria
chelseiensis, &c.

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), staged some very fine
plants of Phalzenopsis amabilis Rimestadiana, carrying up to thirty-five
flowers on a spike, a Cultural Certificate and Bronze Medal being awarded
to the gardener. He also sent P. intermedia Portei.

Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge, staged two varieties of Cattleya and
Bollea Lalindei.

Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, staged a fine plant of Miltonia
vexillaria Queen Alexandra, and a form of Cattleya Warscewiczii,

292 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [SEPTEMBER, 1913.

POLLINATION OF DISA UNIFLORA.

AN interesting article on the pollination of the brilliant scarlet Disa uniflora
appeared in the Cape Times for April 5th last, which is here summarised.
It appears that Mr. Harold Hamer has presented to the South African
Museum Herbarium a specimen. of a ripe seed capsule, found in Window
Gorge, and he states that many of the other flowers showed signs of a
swollen ovary, which probably means that they have been pollinated and
will eventually produce ripe fruits. This discovery opens anew a con-
troversy on the pollination of this Disa.

Roland Trimen, as early as 1863, opened the subject. He had
examined a large number of Disa uniflora flowers, and in several cases
found that one of the pollinia had been removed, but in no case saw a
stigma with pollen grains adhering to it. He concluded that the remark-
able brilliant colour of the flower is probably attractive to some day-flying
hymenopterous or lepidopterous insect, and suggests that Disa uniflora
offers nearly a parallel case to that described by Darwin, of the extremely
imperfect fertilisation of Ophrys muscifera in England.

In 1888 the late Dr. Bolus monographed the Cape Peninsula Orchids,
and states that he had never seen a matured seed-vessel, nor been able to
detect any insect employed in its pollination, and he thought that the
insect effecting pollination had become extinct, and that the plant was
propagated solely by means of tubers. In 1895 Dr. Marloth read a paper
before the South African Philosophical Society, and mentioned that fully-
developed fruits had been found by Prof. MacOwan, Mr. Kassner, Mr.
Schlechter, Mr. Chas. Ross, and himself, and concluded that the Disa was
pollinated by insects like other Orchids. As a further proof of this Dr.
Marloth was fortunate in capturing a butterfly, Meneris Tulbaghia (the
Mountain Pride) in the vicinity of a cluster of Disas, which had a pollinium
attached to one of its legs. About two years ago Mr. Phillips saw one of
these butterflies with a pollinium adhering to it. These facts go to prove
that Disa uniflora, though chiefly propagated vegetatively, is also some-
times fertilised and produces seeds.

This is the first season this Disa has been protected from being plucked
at all, which will account for its profusion of bloom on Table Mountain
this year, and will probably mean that a larger percentage of flowers,
especially those growing on exposed cliffs, will become pollinated and
produce seed, than when wholesale picking was allowed as in former years.
Vegetative reproduction by means of tubers may be the chief method of
propagation in this plant, as pointed out by Dr. Bolus and Dr. Marloth,
but this only means that the Disa will be preserved in the few localised
areas it is now found in. It is only when it produces seed, which are

>) SE ingaiemamimeanadlil

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 293

sometimes carried away long distances from the parent plant, that
colonisation of fresh areas can take place. These latter remarks will apply
to all those Cape Peninsula plants on the protected list, and lovers of
flowers may confidently expect to find a great increase in these plants in
the next flowering season or two.

In forwarding this article to Mr. R. Dimmer, to whom we are indebted
for a copy, Mr. E. D. Phillips remarks :—‘‘ Some few Sundays ago I went
up Window Gorge myself and saw the Disa fruiting; considerably over
50 per cent. of the plants examined having fruits.”

ODONTONIAS.

THE members of this exceedingly pretty race of bigeneric hybrids are
well adapted for an amateur’s Cool house, for they are free-flowering, and
some of those of earlier raising are comparatively low in price. A position
at the warmer end of the house is best, standing the plants on inverted
pots, and in respect to ventilation, heating, and shading, those methods
usually adopted in regard to the culture of Odontoglossums and Odontiodas
will be found to answer admirably. In the matter of watering the following
hints may be of use: In spring and autumn, a dose every third day; in
summer, usually daily, and in winter once every four or five days. As in
common with the majority of hybrids, these Odontonias take little or no
rest, therefore any attempt at drying them off after flowering, would be
attended with disastrous results.

After the flowering size is reached, repotting is needed every other year,
the operation being best performed when the new growth is from two to
three inches in length. A compost of green sphagnum moss, polypodium
fibre, and a slight addition of oak leaves; these well mixed together and
used in a damp state forms a very suitable combination. Great care should
be taken in the repotting not to place the base of the bulbs below the rim
of the pot. Cotton wool must be wrapped round the base of the flower
spikes, or they are liable to be eaten by slugs, and a whole year’s growing
thereby wasted.

The following comprise a good selection of the best, those having M.
Warscewiczii for one parent being the most vigorous growers :—

). decora, M. Warscewiczii x O. Adrianz.
Edna, M. Warscewiczii X O. Wilckeanum.
Lelia Sander, M. Warscewiczii X O. amabile.
Lairessee, M. Warscewiczii X O. crispum.
Lambeauiana, M. Warscewiczii X O. Lambeauianum.
Roger Sander, M. Warscewiczii X O. percultum.
St. Alban, M. Warscewiczii X O. Pescatorei.
C. ALWYN HARRISON.

2999000

294 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (SEPTEMBER, 1913.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.

By C. Atwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
TuIs month is one of the busiest for the Orchid grower, for preparations
must now be made for the ensuing winter. With this object in view, the
house must be thoroughly overhauled, the paths, staging, and roof glass
washed, the pots scrubbed, dead leaves cut away, and the plants sponged,
after which they should be placed in their winter quarters, with Cypri-
pedium insigne, C. villosum, Odontoglossum crispum, and O. Pescatorei at
the coolest end, and the hybrid and choicer things at the warmest. As an
extra safeguard the staging should be well syringed with a strong solution
of some insecticide, applying it more especially in the corners, and where
the wooden lathes overlap and intercross, these being favourite haunts of
woodlice and slugs.

Although fire-heat will probably not yet be required, yet it will be found
advisable to test the heating apparatus one evening to ensure its being in
proper working order for use in the following month. The following
average temperatures will be found conducive to the healthy growth es
the plants during the autumn :—

Day, 55° to 65° Fahr; night, 53° to 60° Fahr.

Obviously with such a comparatively low degree of warmth, a consider-
able quantity of fresh air can still be admitted, and it is of the utmost
importance that the atmosphere should always feel pure and buoyant,
especially for Cool house Orchids. Until the nights become chilly a little
air can be left on, which is of more value than many growers imagine, for
it enables the plants to recoup after a hot and, perhaps, airless day.
Damping and syringing must now be done in moderation; a slight spray
over the leaves about nine a.m. and a good damping down about five p.m.
will usually prove sufficient. As to watering, growing plants will probably
need a good dose of water every third day, and those at rest once a week,
but obviously these matters depend so much upon the weather that no hard
and fast rules can be given.

The liquid shading that was applied to the roof glass in May must be
washed off towards the close of this month, for the blinds will afford all the
protection necessary, and should only be lowered when the sun is shining
directly on the house, for if overshaded now weak and_ unsatisfactory
flower spikes will be produced by the winter-flowering Odontoglossums, as
light is an important factor in their development.

Odontoglossum grande is now pushing up its flower spikes, and should
be kept as close to the roof glass as possible and exposed to the full sun.
This is an ideal species for an amateur’s house, producing strong spikes of
immense yellow and brown blossoms, which will continue several weeks

|

SEPTEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 295

in full beauty. A sharp look-out should be kept for slugs, as they are
extremely partial to this Orchid, the flower spikes and young roots apparently
forming a special attraction to them.

OBITUARY,
WiLLi1AM HoLMeEs.—It is with deep regret that we learn of the death, on
July 9th last, of Mr. William Holmes, Orchid grower to J. McCartney,
Esq., Hey House, Bolton, in his sixty-second year. The deceased has long
been a prominent supporter of the Manchester Orchid Society, and was one
of the best-known and most highly respected Orchid growers in the North
of England; and the Journal of Horticulture remarks that the groups and
specimen plants exhibited by him at the Whitweek Show in Manchester in
the nineties, when he had charge of the Pickering Lodge collection, have,
it is asserted by Orchid specialists, never been equalled since in Lancashire.
ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.

Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural meee will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, West ter, during September,
on the gth and 23rd, when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual
hour, 12 o’clock noon.

The next meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid
Society will be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on September 25th.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection of
members and the public from I to 4 o’clock p.m.

The following amendments have been made in the list of competitions
for the current session, as published at page 199. The Objet d’ Art offered
by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. is for New Plants; the Medal presented by
Mr. J. Evans for Odontoglossums, and that by the Royal Botanic Society
of Manchester for Cattleyas.

ORCHIDS FROM PENARTH.—Several interesting and beautiful Orchids
are sent from the collection of J. J. Neale, Esq., Penarth, by Mr. Haddon,
including Leeliocattleya callistoglossa, Lustre, Greenwoodii, and elegans,
Cattleya Tacitus and Dowiana aurea, the handsome Oncidium Lanceanum
and Kramerianum, Cycnoches chlorochilon, Cirrhopetalum nutans,
Physosiphon Loddigesii, and several other interesting botanical species.

R.H.S. Screntiric CoMMITTEE.—The following reference to Orchids
exhibited at meetings of the Committee are taken from the official report
(continued from page 168) :—

June 3rd, 1913 :-—

L&LIOCATTLEYA FREAK.—Mr. G. Wilson showed a plant of Cattleya

296 THE ORCHID REVIEW. |SEPTEMBER, 1913.

citrina X Lelia purpurata from the garden of C. J. Lucas, Esq., Warnham
Court, Horsham. The flowers are intermediate in size and colour between
those of the parents, and they are produced on a horizontal spike. A
Certificate of Appreciation was recommended to Mr. C. J. Lucas.
CaTTLEYA Mossi# BUD SPORT.—Mr. E. H. Davidson sent a plant of C.
Mossiz Golden Ray, having the petals marked with yellow like the labellum.
It appears to be a case of irregular peloria, but differing from the usual
form of peloria in having the labellum characters showing in the petals,
whereas in the usual form the petal characters show in the labellum.

July 15th :—Liparis LacERATA.—Mr. J. O’Brien showed an inflorescence
of Liparis lacerata (Ridley, Journ. Linn. Soc., xxii. 1886, p. 284, Malay
Peninsula, Perak, &c., Dist. Tenasserim, Borneo). A small example is
represented in Burbidge’s drawings of Borneo plants in the Natural
History Museum. The species was little known until it flowered with the
Hon. N. Charles Rothschild, and was noted in Gardeners’ Chronicle,
February 15th, 1913, p. 99, from a plant sent to him by a collector in
Borneo. The present specimen, flowering with Sir Marcus Samuel, was
obtained from the same source. Some of the flowers had dropped, but the
spike was about nine inches in length.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

CATTLEYA Mossi (a fine specimen).—Horticulture, 1913, p. 176, with fig.

CaTTLEYA WaRSCEWICZ1I.—Journ. Hort., 1913, ii. p- II1, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM CALLOSUM SANDER&.—Journ. Hort., 1913, ii. pp. I10, III,
with fig.

DENDROBIUM THYRSIFLORUM.—Horticulture, 1913, p. 137, with fig.

ODONTOGLOSSUM QUEEN ALEXANDRA VAR. THEODORA.—Gard. Mag.,
1g13, p. 601, with fig.

STANHOPEA CONVOLUTA, Rolfe.—Bot. Mag.,.t. 8507.

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

Orchids are named and ave esttons answered her. as Ae as esate ard os es are

re —_ ested to oe: the native country or parentage of pike sent, An RESSED postcard be

ent if a reply by post is dries (abroad, dad poseaets should be nee vi aide of P pecta
eee will be dealt with in the body of th ae

y
fies in a cardboard case open at the ends. We s suggest that os pe dig dn would pie
best if gathered hei at rest, freed from m superfluous moisture, and then wrapped in oiled
silk, with proper protection against crushing in the post.

E.F.C.—We do not know whether Cattleya _peaphyroetacen, Rchb. f., is in cultivation at
the present time. We have not seen it for yea

F.D.—A form of Catasetum splendens, baba: which we havea note about.

oa —Thanks for note. We nave corrected the record.

aw
sternal

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

VoL. XXI.]- OCTOBER, 1913. [No. 250.

OUR NOTE BOOK.

THE enormous number of Hybrid Orchids that are constantly appearing
imposes an increasing difficulty in keeping accurate records of them, and
thus preventing as much as possible the unnecessary duplication of names.
This has long been felt by the R.H.S. Orchid Committee, and, although
their records only deal with Certificated Orchids, it has frequently been:
found necessary to alter names through the discovery that named hybrids.
of similar parentage were already in existence. In order to meet this
difficulty the following motion was unanimously adopted by the Orchid:
Committee at its meeting on September gth :—

**In view of the necessity of securing the earliest possible records of new
hybrids, and to supplement the list of plants that have received Awards, the
Orchid Committee recommend that a new record, to be called the Hybrid
Orchid Register, be established, and that Orchid raisers and growers be
asked to bring their new plants when in flower for the first time, even
although they may not be sufficiently developed to enter for Awards, and to-
enter the name, parentage, and name of the exhibitor of the plant on a
Registration form, to go before the Committee. After testing, to prove:
that the name is in order, it shall be entered on the Society’s Hybrid.
Orchid Register, and, once recorded, the name must be recognised for alb
crosses of similar parentage when subsequently shown, unless valid reason:
can be given to prévent it.”

This proposed registration of Orchid Hybrids is a step in the right
direction, and if carried out with thoroughness, and in accordance with the
Rules of Nomenclature which have been drawn up, and widely accepted,
such a Register should be of much value in checking the piling up of
useless synonymy. The difficulty of any list is that it becomes rapidly
out of date, even while being printed, and the only way to prevent this
seems to be to keep it constantly posted up, meeting by meeting, and to
refer to it constantly whenever a supposed new hybrid comes up for
consideration. The matter we believe has been referred to a Sub-
Committee of the Council for consideration and report.

Tv

298 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcroBeR, 1913.

Another interesting generic hybrid has appeared, having been raised
by Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, from Ada aurantiaca and
Odontoglossum Edwardii. It was exhibited at a meeting of the R.H.S. on
September gth, under the name of Adoglossum Juno, and was accorded a
Certificate of Appreciation by the Scientific Committee. It is curious to
see the way in which the very distinct characters of the parents have been
combined, for those of the Odontoglossum parent decidedly preponderate,
both in share and colour, so much so that the influence of the other parent
is quite obscured. Ada aurantiaca would probably combine better with an
Odontoglossum of more nearly its own colour, and-the larger the size the
more likely would the hybrid be to be of horticultural importance. In all
probability it is only the first of a series.

The combination between Ada aurantiaca and Cochlioda Neetzliana is
already known, having been flowered by M. Henri Graire, Amiens, in
August, 1g10, and exhibited under the name of Adioda St. Fuscien. This
has a brilliant red colour, as might have been expected from its parentage,
but the flower largely resembles the Ada parent in shape. It has also been
raised by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, and plants from
both raisers were exhibited at a meeting of the R.H.S. in January last,
when a Certificate of Appreciation was awarded. It will be interesting to
see what other hybrids from this very distinct and brightly-coloured Orchid
are like.

From an announcement on another page it will be seen that Sir Harry
J. Veitch is retiring, and that the Orchid business over which he has so
long presided with such conspicuous success is being separated from the
general nursery and seed business, and will in future be carried on at
Langley by Messrs. S. W. Flory and J. M. Black, both of whom have long
experience to guide them. They have acquired the entire Orchid stock,
including the numerous unflowered seedlings, all derived from selected
parents. The seed business, and the principal part of the seed grounds at
Langley, have been purchased by Messrs. Sutton and Sons, Reading. Our
good wishes follow Sir Harry into his well-earned retirement, which we
hope he and Lady Veitch may long be spared to enjoy. It will be re-
membered that the honour of knighthood was conferred on Sir Harry
on the occasion of the Royal International Horticultural Exhibition held
in the grounds of the Royal Hospital, Chelsea, last year. His portrait
was given at page 41 of our last volume, together with a short account
of his numerous activities, and of the history of the firm of which he
has so long been the head. Our nineteenth volume was also dedicated
to Sir Harry.

OcTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 299

THE REICHENBACHIAN HERBARIUM.

OurR article on the Reichenbachian Herbarium at pp. 273-278 has, we are
glad to find, aroused considerable interest. An old friend, who knew the
late Prof. Reichenbach for over twenty years before his death, writes: “It
was forty-five years ago that I first visited him, and repeated the visit twice
yearly for a long period. There were 130 steps to climb to his high abode,
chosen, as he said jokingly, so that no spilt water might destroy his
treasures. At last, light will be thrown upon his work. He made mistakes,
but he had not the great Kew Herbarium to run to on the spur of the
moment. fle was great, and had a marvellous mind. His memory wants
careful handling. He did endless good, and we have all reaped the benefit
of his sowing.”

We are also asked by another correspondent whether the Herbarium is
likely to be of much use after being shut up all these years? Our reply
must be in the affirmative. We believe that ample means were taken to
preserve the specimens from the ravages of damp and insects, and if this
has been done no fear need be felt as to their safety. The Herbaria of
Lindley and of Wallich are in excellent condition, and even the much older
Herbarium of Linnzus is well preserved. With proper care the lapse of
years scarcely counts in this connection. As to the work having been
carried on very well without the Herbarium, let us be under no illusions.
It has been a long struggle under adverse circumstances, as those who
realise the difficulties involved will be able to appreciate. It is not always
€asy to identify closely allied species from descriptions alone, even when
carefully made from ample materials. What then shall be said for
imperfect descriptions, often made from incomplete or unrepresentative
Scraps, without any attempt to give dimensions, and sometimes without any
indication of the native country ?

Let us give an example. In 1860 Reichenbach described (Hamb.
Gartenz., 1860, p. 424) a new Stanhopea from Consul Schiller’s collection,
as follows :—

*‘ STANHOPEA COSTARICENSIS. aff. St. Wardii, hypochilio pandurato,
inferne profunde intruso, hinc quasi bigibbo, gibbere antico curvato,
transverso, postice utrinque carinato, canali subclauso.

“Von Costa Rica in Herrn Consul Schiller’s Sammlung.”

There is not a word besides, but will anyone who knows Stanhopeas
tell us to which species it belongs? It may be large or small, white or
yellow, spotted or unspotted, in short the description is wholly inadequate.
If the locality is correct, the plant may ultimately be identified with some
Costa Rican species, but in the meantime it may have been described under
Some other name, in which case the law of priority will consign the new

300 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OCTOBER, 1913-

name to oblivion. This law prohibits an author from redescribing a plant
under a new name, although failing to secure for him the one condition
that would prevent such a mistake. The probability is that many species
have been so redescribed, while others have been wrongly identified, simply
because the world cannot wait on posterity, merely to gratify the caprice of
an individual who, though himself receiving ample assistance from his
contemporaries, did not scruple to place all the obstacles possible in the
path of his successors.

A week after Prot. Reichenbach’s death was announced, the following
appeared in the pages of the Gardeners’ Chronicle : “It would be a pleasing
thing to us just now if a subscription were raised to commemorate the
labours of Professor Reichenbach, with a view to found some distinction
connected with Orchids which would be worthy of his name, for I am sure
the proposal would be well received and successful. Being a great lover of
Orchids, it would give me great satisfaction to subscribe, particularly as it
is just fifty years since I first made the acquaintance of Professor Lindley
and became a contributor to the Gardeners’ Chronicle.” In supporting the
movement the Editor spoke of the letter as expressing “a feeling which we
believe to be general among Orchidists,” but shortly afterwards the
conditions of the late Professor’s Will were announced, and, naturally
enough, nothing further was heard of the proposal. It was doubtless felt
that the Professor had successfully erected his own memorial.

Less than a year later the testamentary dispositions of another celebrated
naturalist were announced, and the Chronicle then remarked: ‘‘ What
a contrast this Will presents to that of another naturalist, who thought the
search after the truth (which is science) could be promoted by sealing up
his collections for a quarter of a century. In referring to this matter we
may mention that we have only just ascertained the date of this malicious
will, which was April rrth, 1888. A few days after the testator received,
at the Ghent Quinquennial Exhibition, from the hands of the King of the
Belgians, a Gold Medal, given in honour of the Professor, and as @
testimony of gratitude from the Royal Agricultural and Botanical Society
of Ghent. Surely the recipient of the Medal must have felt that he had
forfeited his claim to the gratitude of his fellows.

The following note, which appeared im the pages of the American
Florist, affords a suitable conclusion to our article :—

“A REICHENBACH INJUSTICE.—A. B. was a very successful botanical
collector, and discovered several new Orchids in the East Indies and
Indian Archipelago. Some of these were imported alive into Europe, and
are now in general cultivation, and the discoverer has received due credit
for them. But he discovered several species, if not some genera, new to
science, and of which he was able only to secure herbarium specimens. Op

OCTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 301

returning to Europe, he sent these, together with complete information
and drawings to Reichenbach, but he has never heard anything further of
them, and now they are locked up in the Reichenbachian Herbarium, to
remain there, sealed from the world, for the next twenty-five years. In the
meantime it is quite probable that C. D., E. F., and others may rediscover
these new plants in their native wilds, and secure living or herbarium
specimens of them, and submit them to the authorities at Kew for
identification of name, and gain the credit of being the original discoverers.
This is very galling, and ill requites the dangers, privations, and sickness
A. B. underwent, his enthusiasm in the field, and his passionate love for
Orchids. But it is a stinging lesson—it teaches us how unsafe it is to trust
our eggs in any one man’s private basket. Had Kew, or some other noble,
liberal, public institution of the kind been entrusted with the identification
and classification of Orchids, no such injustice as that done to A. B. could
possibly have been done.”

DENDROBIUM MICROGLAPHYS.
IT is interesting to recover another of the lost Reichenbachian species.
Dendrobium microglaphys was introduced from Borneo in 1865 by Mr.
Stuart Low, and flowered in the winter of 1867, in the collection of Went-
worth W. Buller, Esq., Strete Raleigh, near Exeter, being described by
Reichenbach (Gard. Chron., 1868, p. 1014). It was described as a species
in the way of D. aduncum, Wall., with stems a span high, ligulate
acuminate leaves, and racemes of whitish flowers with five purple stripes
on the lip. It was probably soon lost sight of, and nothing further seems
to have been recorded about it. A similar plant has now flowered among
the Bornean importations of Sir Marcus Samuel Bart., The Mote,
Maidstone, and has been sent to Kew for determination by Mr. James
O’Brien. The flowers are borne on short racemes, and are over 3-inch long,
with subconivent white sepals and ‘petals, and the lip purple at the base,
‘broken up into five purple lines in the centre, and the apex light yellow.
‘The mentum is saccate, obtuse, and }-inch long. It somewhat resembles
D. callibotrys, Ridl., in habit. The flowers have a pleasant heliotrope-like
fragrance.—R.A.R.
——_+- 0-4
OBITUARY.

Joun Snow Moss.—It is with the deepest regret that we have to record the
death, at his residence, Wintershill Hall, Bishops Waltham, on September
t1th, of this well-known amateur Orchidist, at the age of 54 years. Mr. Moss
had just returned from a visit to the Continent when he was seized with an
apoplectic stroke, from which he never rallied. He had been an enthusiastic
Orchidist for upwards of thirty years, and as long ago as June, 1890, a new

302 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcTOBER, 1913-

Ccelogyne flowered in his collection, which had been received from a friend
in the Nilghiri Hills, S. India, and which was afterwards described under
the name of C. Mossiz, after his wife. Of late years he had taken up the
hybridising of Odontoglossums with considerable success, and an account
of his collection appeared at pp. 111-117 of our April issue. A group of his
hybrid seedlings was figured as recently as August last (see page 249). One
of his most highly prized Orchids was Odontoglossum crispum Mossiz,
which flowered among imported plants, and which he has used much for
hybridising with. It is figured at page 113. His first hybrid was Odonto-
glossum Kenchii (Wilckeanum x Kegeljanii), named after his gardener,
Mr. Kench, and perhaps the most remarkable was Odontioda Mossize
(C. Neetzliana X O. maculatum), which received an Award of Merit from
the R.H.S. in March last, when a similar award was given to a brilliant
form of Miltonioda Harwoodii raised by him. Mr. Moss has been for some
time a member of the Orchid Committee of the R.H.S., and his death
creates a vacancy on that body. He was one of the Jurors at the two last
Quinquennial meetings at Ghent, and also a Judge at the Horticultural
Exhibition held at Brussels last year. He was well known as an
enthusiastic and successful cultivator, and his loss is deplored by fellow
Orchidists and by a wide circle of friends, with whom he was universally
popular. The funeral took place on September 15th at Upham—in which
parish the residence of the deceased gentleman is situated, and of which
parish he had for some years been rector’s warden—in the presence of a
large company of friends and neighbours. On the coffin rested a
magnificent wreath of his favourite Orchids, placed there by his widowr
and there were many other floral emblems. The flowers used for the grave
were principally from the gardens of Mrs. Travers and the Hon. Albert
Hood, the work being carried out with the assistance of Mr. Kench, who
has been head gardener to Mr. Moss for the last seventeen years.
ApDoLPHUS Henry Kent, B.A.—After a long and painful illness, and at
the mature age of 85 years, Mr. A. Hy Kent passed away, on September
12th, at his residence, Mycene, Doria Road, Feltham. Mr. Kent was for
Many years private secretary to Mr. (now Sir Harry J.) Veitch, in which
capacity he was largely responsible for the carrying out of that standard
work, Vettch’s Manual of Orchidaceous Plants, his unremitting care in its
preparation being gratefully recognised in the preface. He was also the
writer of that valuable work, Veitch’s Manual ‘of Conferae, originally
published in 1881, and of which a second and greatly enlarged edition
appeared in x900. He was originally educated as a schoolmaster, but
relinquished the business owing to increasing deafness, when he accepted
a post with Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, eventually retiring ona pension.
Mr. Kent had a good knowledge of Botany and the theoretical and practical

OcroseR, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 303

side of horticulture, as well as of foreign languages. He obtained his
degree in the University of London in 1871. Some years ago he was
elected an Associate of the Linnean Society in recognition of ‘his excellent
work. Deceased was a widower with no issue, and his extensive library of
classical and scientific books are bequeathed to his nephew, Mr. Charles H.
Kent.

WILLIAM BuLL.—We regret to record the death of Mr. William Bull,
eldest son of the founder of the Establishment for New and Rare Plants,
Chelsea. On the death of Mr. William Bull, sen., in 1902, the business
was continued by the sons, under the title of Messrs. William Bull & Sons,
but failing health led to the retirement of the elder in 1909, and he then
went to live at Brighton, where he died on September 8th.

BULBOPHYLLUM BISETUM.

AN interesting little Bulbophyllum was exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Sons
at the R.H.S. meeting held on September 23rd, which proves to be B.
bisetum, Lindl., a species described in 1842 (Ann. Nat. Hist., x. p. 186),
from dried specimens collected in the Khasia Hills by Griffith, the author
remarking that it was a very singular little plant, with flowers as large as
a small pea, and deeply keeled sepals. In 1851 it was described and
figured by Griffith under the name of B. cirrhopetaloides (Griff. Notul., iii.
p- 290; Ic. Pl. Asiat., ili. t. 296, fig. 1), from the same source. It was
afterwards collected by Hooker & Thomson, and by Mr. C. B. Clarke, in
the Khasia Hills, where it grows at 4000 to 5000 feet elevation. More
recently it has been collected in Sikkim, at 5000 to 6000 feet elevation by
Mr. R. Pantling, and is figured in the Orchids of the Sikkim Himalaya
(Amn. R. Bot. Gard. Calc., viii. p. 73, t. 99). Theauthors remark: ‘‘ The
flower is remarkable for the spurs which run parallel to the dorsal sepal
and to the petals, and which are homologous with the spurs of the Burmese
B. xylophyllum.” They are really ;filiform appendages, longer than the
spathulate petals, behind which they are situated, and they arise from the
junction of the dorsal and lateral sepals. Their homology and function are
obscure, but Griffith suggested that they might be appendages of two of
the ribs of the ovary. Lindley called them filiform bracts, and from their
presence he derived the specific name. The pseudobulbs are depressed
Ovoid, produced on a slender creeping rhizome, and bear a single lanceolate
leaf, while the scapes are pendulous, filiform, with a short raceme of many
dull purple and green flowers. A plant of this curious little species
flowered in the Royal Botanic Garden, Glasnevin, in September, 1898.
Sir Joseph Hooker cited B. cariniflorum, Rchb. f., as synonymous, but
according to the original specimen in Lindley’s Herbarium it has much
broader leaves and is otherwise different.—R. A. ROLFE.

304 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (Ocroper, 1913.

CATTLEYA DOWIANA AUREA.
THIS magnificent Cattleya, undoubtedly the finest in the genus, is
unfortunately, not the easiest to cultivate, but from observations of plants

>

in different collections and from my own experience, I am convinced that its
reputation for being shy flowering is due to a wrong system of culture.
The ideal position for this Orchid is to suspend it at the warmest end of
the Cattleya house, only a few inches from the roof glass, and in as sunny
a position as possible, taking care to give it throughout the year as much

Fig. 59. CatTrLeya DowIANA AUREA.

light as possible, shading only for a few hours in July and August when the
sun is shining directly upon the plant. It should never be subjected to a
lower temperature than 55° Fahr., and during the growing season a humid
atmosphere is very necessary.

Another important point in the cultivation of this Orchid is to keep it
in a fresh and sweet compost, and for this reason I consider that repotting
every alternate year is of absolute necessity, this operation being best
performed when the plant, after flowering and resting, is pushing forth new

OCTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 305

roots. The following will provide a satisfactory rooting medium: Two
parts of osmunda fibre,-one part Art fibre, and one of polypodium fibre.
Care must be taken to pot the plant firmly, and not to overwater it, as it is
rather more subject to rot than some of the other species. Lastly I am
positively convinced that much benefit is afforded the plants if the house be
damped every three or four days in the summer evenings with a weak
solution of manure water, of course not touching the plants themselves,
merely spraying the path and stages. C. ALWYN HARRISON.

ORCHIDS AT BRUGES.

A visir to the extensive establishment of Messrs. Sander & Sons, Bruges,
completed our Belgian trip, and proved particularly interesting and
instructive. Great progress has been made during the past five years,
especially in the seedling department, to which we first made our way,
Mr. F. Sander, who acted as guide, remarking that we might as well begin
at the beginning. On passing into the first house we found thousands of
tiny seedling Cattleyas and allies, in various stages. The seeds are sown
on polypodium fibre and canvas, and the seed beds were in many cases
green with tiny globules, all from choice crosses. The work of pricking
them off was in progress, and for this delicate work girls are employed, and
become exceedingly expert, placing the tiny seedlings on three-inch pots of
prepared compost—some eighty or ninety on each—with the utmost
regularity. The tiny leaves soon begin to push, and when more room is
required they are pricked off again. Successive batches were pointed out,
some done the day before, some a week old, some a month old, and others
six or seven weeks old, showing an interesting progression in size. The
seedlings are now potted separately in }-inch and 4-inch pots, these being
then bedded out in square pans of sphagnum moss to keep the compost
from drying up. The temperature ot the house is maintained from 20° to
22° Centigrade (68° to 72° Fahr.). It may be added that the usual trouble
is experienced with the fly that attacks Orchid seedlings, which is
continually being brought in with the polypodium fibre and sphagnum
moss, so that there seems to be no method of stamping it out, though the
usual means are taken to keep it in check. A toad was observed on the
floor of one of the houses, and these are excellent vermin killers, in fact Mr.
Sander has encouraged his men to bring them in by a small payment.

As the seédlings progress they are taken into other houses, and the next
house contains hundreds of boxes of sphagnum filled with the tiny pots,
each containing a flourishing little seedling. A large number of albino
Cattleyas were pointed out, from the well-known C. Mossiz Wageneri
down to the recent C. Warscewiczii alba, and all under numbers, which are
carefully entered in a record book. It was very interesting to go through

306 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Ocroper, 1913-

these albino seedlings, and a few were pointed out having colour in their
leaves when under the influence of the sun. There were also seedlings
from C. intermedia alba, and Mr. Sander remarked that these when crossed
with other albinos never give coloured forms, the white being too intense.
Of course the albinos, numerous as they are, only form a small proportion
of the thousands of seedlings seen in all stages, and which must be passed
over with a brief remark, so large is the establishment and so numerous the
features of interest noted.

We now passed into a Cool house, containing seedling Odontoglossums,
Miltonias, Odontiodas, &c., including a good many in spike or flower. A
batch of Miltonia St. Andre X Roezlii was very interesting, and showed
some reversions towards the latter, while one showed a pretty radiating
blotch at the base of the lip. A seedling from M. Roezlii x vexillaria memoria
G. D. Owen has a very pretty plum-coloured blotch at the base of the lip.
This, of course, is a variety of M. Bleuana. A good dark M. Roezlii was in
bloom. Here also was the attractive hybrid from Odontoglossum Edwardii
X Miltonia vexillaria which was described at page 180 under the name of
Odontonia brugensis. Cochlioda Neetzliana X Miltonia Warscewiczil was
in spike, and this has since been described as Miltonioda Cooperi (see p. 232)-
In other cases Miltonia Warscewiczii has been used as the seed bearer, and
several promising seedlings between it and various Odontoglossums were in
bloom, or spike, and these have been noted elsewhere. One curious cross
was M. Warscewiczii x O. Edwardii. A deep rose-purple form of
Odontioda Cupid (C. Neetzliana X O. ramossisimum) was in bloom, and
batches of other promising Odontiodas were pointed out. A lot of seedling
Odontoglossums were producing their first flowers, and we have examples
and notes of some of them, which we may be able to mention later. Some
promise to develop into very handsome things when the plants become
strong. There was the usual amount of variation between seedlings of the
same batch.

In the next house were some older plants, as well as a lot of seedlings,
and we noticed some good Odontioda Bradshawiz in bloom, including one
with light cherry-red markings on a white ground, two good O. Cooksoniz,
O. keighleyensis with a large panicle of flowers, and examples of O.
Charlesworthii. About 150 Odontoglossums were in bloom, and we noted
some good forms of O. eximium, O. armainvillierense with large round

white flowers and a single blotch on each segment, a very fine rosy O.
amabile, blotched with cinnamon, and the lip very broad, O. bellatulum,
a very fine well-blotched form of O. excellens, O. armainvillierense X
crispum, white with a light purple blotch on each segment, O. loochristienses
examples of O. spectabile x Edwardii, one of which was nearly black, a lot
of Edwardii x triumphans, several of them in spike and bloom, and a very

|

OcTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 307°

promising O. crispum Graireanum crossed with another blotched crispum,.
and having broad white segments densely spotted with crimson-brown.
These two houses contained thousands of seedlings in all stages and should:
yield many choice things when they reach the flowering stage.

A house of the old Pacho type of O. crispum formed the strongest
contrast in point of vigour with the seedlings, and some of the plants have
been here for twenty years, in fact Mr. Sander remarked that they are hard
to grow, but they are prized for the good things that have come out of the
importation.

A house of established Odontoglossums contained many good things in
bloom, including two O. McNabianum (Harryanum xX Wilckeanum), one
of which had very dark flowers of enormous size, a good O. eximium with
clusters of purple spots on a white ground, some well-blotched O-
Pescatorei X Hallii, O. amabile with a spike of fifteen large flowers, fine
forms of O. Wilckeanum, some good O. triumphans latisepalum X
sceptrum, one having a spike of seventeen flowers, two very distinct forms
of O. spectabile, one, from crispum as the seed-bearer, being very dark in
colour, O. cirrhosum Xx Harryanum, with a large branched panicle, O.
harvengtense delicatum, a fine form with a very light yellow blotch on the
lip and nearly white petals, and many others, over a hundred being in
flower. There were also good forms of Miltonioda Ajax, Odontioda Sandere,.
and O. grata. We also noted a number of capsules in the house.

Two other houses of Odontoglossums, mostly seedlings, followed, and
here we noted O. Rolfeze x Pescatorei, almost like a white O. Pescatorei,
some good O, altum, with examples of O. cordatum, maculatum, and
Cervantesii, Odontioda Charlesworthii and Bradshawiz, and a nice batch
of Sophronitis grandiflora. Here were also a number of capsules from
interesting crosses.

We now visited two Phalznopsis houses and found an immense number
of plants in the most robust health. In the first was a batch of P.
Schilleriana, and Mr. Sander remarked that last February there were
about 500 spikes of flowers, forming quite a picture. They are grown in
baskets of osmunda fibre, suspended over a layer of leaves, and since:
flowering had been kept rather dry, but as new roots were beginning to
push the supply of water would now be increased. The plants were
remarkably sturdy and clean, and a single example was in bloom, also a
very rosy form of P. Sanderiana, and a batch of three dozen P. Aphrodite,
forming a beautiful group. A batch of P. Sanderiana was growing near by,
and it was remarked how much alike they were. P. Sanderiana, however,
has usually a broader, redder leaf, and the flowers are more or less tinged
with rose. An albino of P. amabilis was pushing up a spike, the whole
plant showing that peculiar pale green colour so prevalent in albinos. P-

“308 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (OCTOBER, 1913

-violacea was pushing up spikes, and we noted P. Lueddemanniana and
‘two plants of the rare P. leucorrhoda, not now in bloom. Here also we
‘noted a good batch of Angrascum Sanderianum, a few being in bloom, and
-a number of Miltonia vexillaria placed here to hasten their flowering.
Near the door were fine plants of the remarkable Arachnanthe Lowii and
Stauropsis lissochiloides, the latter in spike. Moss litter is placed beneath
‘the plants, which helps to maintain a moist atmosphere.

The second house was chiefly devoted to Phalenopsis amabilis
Rimestadiana, the plants being in baskets, in the most robust health, and
‘many of them in bloom. There was an earlier batch of flowers in January.
These plants are largely grown for cut bloom, as the spikes last well when
-cut, and there is a good market for them in Paris. The paths are formed
of cinders, which help to maintain a moist atmosphere. Here we noted a
‘plant of Sarcochilus unguiculatus bearing two spikes, and one of Dendrobium
Serra, a curious species of the Aporum section.

We now passed through a succession of houses filied with interesting
things. A house devoted to seedling Cattleyas and Brassocattleyas
-contained a varied assemblage of growing seedlings from choice crosses,
among which a batch of C. Dowiana aurea crossed with C. labiata alba
-was pointed out as the source of the beautiful C. Fabia alba. Two houses
of Cymbidiums were largely devoted to the handsome C. insigne, but a
-dozen C. Schreederi were in bloom. The two are said to grow intermixed,
and we understand that a natural hybrid between them has flowered. Of
course there were batches of other well-known kinds, and at one end we
noted a remarkable Peruvian Xylobium, since described as X. elatum,
bearing a very tall scape. Then came a house of Lelia Gouldiana, which
is highly valued for cut flowers, and last winter the house was a picture
‘with seven thousand flowers, which were cut a few days before Christmas
for market. A house of Cattleyas and allies followed, where we noted
several C. Skinneri and var. alba in bloom, C. Warneri X Eldorado, most
dike the latter, C. intermedia alba, Leliocattleya Hyeana, several Lelia
cinnabrosa X Cattleya Mendelii, three of which had buff-coloured flowers
and another purple, with several other interesting things, also many
capsules, and a plant of the rare C. O’Brieniana alba.

Then came more Odontoglossum houses, where established plants and
many hybrids were noted, the latter including a batch of O. Harryanum *X
Miltonia vexillaria, the remarkable hybrid which was figured at page 177
under the name of Odontonia Cholletii, batches of O. Lairessee, and other
crosses between Miltonia Warscewiczii and various Odontoglossums,
Miltonias, hybrid Cymbidiums, &c., &c., which we must pass over.

A house largely devoted to Oncidiums contained many fine O. concolor
and. Marshallianum, with a batch of O. Forbesii, and others, and here we

OCTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 3°09

noted Leliocattleya Boylei var. Kerchovee and L.-c. Cholletiana in spike.
Then came another house containing a fine batch of Cattleya Warscewiczii’
Sanderiana, a few brilliant forms being in bloom, also a lot of C. Schreedere,.
showing much variation, a few C. Mendelii, Epidendrum Stamfordianum,
Brassia verrucosa, Brassavola fragrans, with a spike of nine flowers, &c.

The white forms of Lelia anceps are excellent for cut flowers, and we
found a large house of them, the longer bulbs, as compared with the purple-
flowered typical form, being pointed out. Then came other houses of
Cattleyas and allies, choice Cypripediums, in which we found a lot of the
handsome C. Curtisii nobilior in flower, Miltonias, Odontoglossums, Vanda
coerulea, and miscellaneous subjects, some of which we were obliged to miss
for want of time. In passing through them we noted a few good.
Trichopilia suavis and Backhouseana, Lycaste fulvescens with seven
flowers, a lot of Anguloas in bud, the brilliant Cochlioda Neetzliana,
Dendrobium Kingianum, various interesting Masdevallias, Epidendrum:
glumaceum, Oncidium trulliferum, a lot of Saccolabium bellinum, Coelogyne
Mooreana, &c., &c.

In a house of Dendrobiums we noted good forms of D. Dearei, Sanderz,
and the fine D. Schuetzii, forming an interesting trio, D. Brymerianum,.
crassinode, Jenkinsii, Devonianum, hercoglossum, Bronckartii, and batches-
of the well-known popular species, while Ccelogyne Dayana with several:
pendulous spikes was very graceful.

Our notes have become somewhat lengthy, but we have omitted more-
than we have found space to note, for the establishment is so large, and the
Standard of culture of so high a class that one cannot do justice to it even:
in a long article. The hybrid department is an establishment in itself, and
the seedlings are so numerous that they overflow into most of the other
houses. All are from choice crosses, for the need for selection in the-
parents is now fully realised, and many sterling novelties may be anticipated.
as the seedlings reach the flowering stage. We must congratulate Messrs.
Sander and their able Chef de Culture, M. Chollet, on the excellent
condition of the establishment.

GHENT SUMMER EXHIBITION.
A SuMMER Show, organised by the Cercle Van Houtte, was held in the
Palaise de |’Horticulture, Ghent, from August gth to 17th, and produced a-
magnificent display, though not so extensive and imposing as the earlier
Quinquennial Exhibition held in the same building in April. The arrange-
ments were very successfully carried out by a committee, under the
Presidency of Count Joseph de Hemptinne, and the awards were made by
an International Jury. Orchids were shown in remarkable numbers,-.
considering the season, and in excellent quality, and on this occasion were

310 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcTOBER, 1913.

staged together on sloping stages in three wide tiers at one end of the
‘building, with intervening spaces for the convenience of visitors.

In the Amateur’s Class for the best and most varied group of Orchids,
‘tthe Objet d’Art, value 200 francs, was awarded to M. Firmin Lambeau,
Brussels, by acclamation, with a magnificent group, including some
‘brilliant Cattleya Warscewiczii, C. W. Frau Melanie Beyrodt, C. W.
Deweyi, with a very richly-coloured lip, C. Dupreana, C. Hardyana vars.
Triomphe, ardens, and Vogelsang, three very brilliant forms, C. Peetersii
Comet, C. Pynaertiana, C. Gaskelliana perfecta, a pretty light form, C.
Dowiana, Dendrobium Phalenopsis and Dearei, Oncidium macranthum,
‘Cypripedium Rolfei, and various other fine things, the whole being very
-effectively arranged.

In the corresponding class for Nurserymen a similar prize was awarded,
by acclamation, to MM. Th. Pauwels & Cie, Meirelbeke, the group
containing about 350 plants, including some good Vanda ccerulea, V.
Parishii, Grammangis Ellisii with two fine spikes, Dendrobium aggregatum,
acuminatum, and some excellent D. Phalenopsis, one with a spike of
‘twenty-one flowers, Odontioda Charlesworthii, Lambeauiana, and Diana,
fine examples of Cattleya Warscewiczii, C. Gaskelliana alba, C. Roths-
-childiana alba, with creamy white flowers, Cypripedium Rothschildianum,
Bulbophyllum Lobbii with nineteen flowers, Odontoglossum Gladys with
sixty-six flowers, some good Phalenopsis, Miltonias, and other fine things.

For the best fifty Orchids (Amateurs) the Objet d’Art, value 100
‘francs, was won by Dr. Baillion, Ghent, his group containing beautiful
examples of Cattleya Hardyana, C. Madame Myra Peeters, several fine
~C. Warscewiczii, C. President Henri de Wilde, C. Whitei, C. Thurgood-
iana, the albino Cypripedium memoria Alma Gevaert, C. selligerum, Vanda
-ceerulea, a beautiful Miltonia vexillaria Queen Alexandra, Brassocattleya
Edmondiana, and a number of brilliant Odontiodas.

In the corresponding class for Nurserymen, M. Maurice Verdonck,
~Gentbrugge, was first, his group including a beautiful series of Phalzenopsis
amabilis, Dendrobium regium, Acineta chrysantha, Thunia Marshalliana,
a fine Cypripedium Lawrenceanum, Coelogyne Massangeana, Cochlioda
‘Neetzliana, Odontioda Charlesworthii, and others. The second prize,
.a Gold Medal, went to M. René Beheils, St.-Nicholas, whose group
included fine plants of Dendrobium Dearei and Sandere, Aérides

Lawrencee, Vanda Sanderiana, Cattleya Gaskelliana and Rothschild-
‘tana, Odontoglossum armainvillierense xanthotes, Cypripedium cenanthum,
and several fine Oncidium varicosum.

In an Amateur’s Class for the best twenty Cattleyas, the Objet d’Art,
value 100 francs, was won ou Dr. Baillion, Ghent, with a fine group of
-well-grown plants.

OcTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. gir

In a corresponding class for Nurserymen, the prize was won by MM.
Th. Pauwels & Cie., Meirelbeke, with a fine group.

For the most beautiful Cattleya M. Firmin Lambeau was first, with C.
Comet var. Rutilant, a deep purple form, with a darker zone of colour
round the front of the lip, and the throat orange-brown. The second prize
went to Count Joseph de Hemptinne, St.-Denis, for C. Van Houtte
{Warscewiczii X Rothschildiana), a very promising hybrid.

In the class for Leeliocattleyas or allied hybrids, M. Firmin Lambeau
was first, with Brassocattleya Dietrichiana albescens, having cream-white
sepals and petals, and the lip yellow with a rosy margin.

For the most beautiful group of Miltonia vexillaria, the Gold Medal
was awarded:to M. Charles Dietrich, Anderghem, with felicitations, his
group containing a varied and beautiful display of well-flowered plants.

For the best Miltonia vexillaria or hybrid of the genus, the Silver-gilt
Medal was also won by M. Ch. Dietrich, with a beautiful plant of M.
vexillaria memoria G. D. Owen.

For the most beautiful group of Phalzwnopsis the Gold Medal was
awarded to M. M. Verdonck, with felicitations, the group containing a
series of well-grown plants of P. amabilis, bearing about forty-five spikes.

For the most beautiful group of Dendrobiums the Gold Medal was won
by MM. Th. Pauwels & Cie, the group containing fine examples of D.
Bronckartii, Phalaenopsis, Sandere, acuminatum, and others.

For the most beautiful group of Cypripedes the Gold Medal was won by
M. De Meter, Meirelbeke, with a good group.

For the best and most varied group of Guatemalan Orchids, the Silver-)
gilt Medal was won by MM. Van de Putte et Cie., Ledeberg, their group
including good examples of Odontoglossum. grande, Uroskinneri and var.
album, Epidendrum nemorale and fragrans, Lycaste Skinneri, and others.

An Objet d’Art, value 200. francs, was offered by M. Francis Spae,
General Secretary of the Society, forthe best group of plants imported and
put into commerce by the late Louis Van Houtte. This was awarded
unanimously, and with the felicitations of the Jury, to the Société Anonyme
Van Houtte Pére, whose group included several interesting Orchids.

A good plant of Vanilla planifolia variegata was exhibited by the
Societé Horticole Gantoise, to whom the Gold Medal, offered by His
Majesty the King of the Belgians for a group of forty stove plants, was
awarded.

In a group of new plants not in commerce, for which Messrs. Sander
& Sons, Bruges, gained the first prize, were included Brassocattleya
amabilis and Odontioda Hemptinneana.

Non-CoOMPETITIVE EXHIBITS.
M. Jules Hye de Crom, Coupure, Ghent, was awarded an Objet d’Art-

3£2 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcTOBER, 1913-

value 200 francs, for a beautiful group of Orchids, in which Miltonia
vexillaria and its varieties and hybrids were represented by about 200
well-grown plants, particularly noteworthy being M. Bleuana, M. Hyeana
Flambeau, and M. H. gracilis. Cattleya labiata Susanne Hye de Crom, C.
Dupreana Hyeana, and C. Dowiana Mme. J. Hye de Crom, were also
excellent, with Masdevallia Harryana alba, Cypripedium Gaston Bultel,.
C. Massaianum, and a fine Lycaste Skinneri alba.

M. Ch. Vuylsteke, Loochristi, was awarded an Objet d’Art, value 200
francs, for a beautiful group of well-grown Odontiodas, Miltonias, and,
Odontoglossums, among the former being O. Flambeau and O. Vuylstekee
var. Carmen, and among the latter O. amabile Roi Albert, O. Hisionii, a
beautiful creamy yellow flower, O. Ariadne, O. azureum var. Orion, lilac-
purple, O. Themis, dark purple, O. Minos, O. armainvillierense exornatum,.
and other fine things, all the plants being well-grown and very floriferous.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate, received a Gold
Medal for a fine collection of Orchids, noteworthy among them being good
examples of Bulbophyllum virescens and grandiflorum, Catasetum Reichen-
bachianum, Cypripedium superbiens, with a dozen flowers, a fine plant of
Phaius Ashworthianus, Peristeria elata, Cypripedium Maudie magnificum,
Cycnoches chlorochilon, and some good Odontiodas.

M. Joseph de Hemptinne, President of the Cercle Horticole Van Houtte,
received an Objet d’Art, value 100 francs, for a group of Orchids, including
some fine hybrids of Odontoglossum Harryanum and others, several
beautiful Cattleya Warscewiczii, Cypripedium Rothschildianum, Leelio-
cattleya Black Prince, a very deep crimson-purple hybrid, a fine specimem
of Masdevallia bella, and other good things.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, received an Objet d’Art,
value 100 francs, for a choice group of Orchids in flower, which included
Vanda Sanderiana and Maroniz, Trichosmasuavis, some good Cypripedium
Charlesworthii, a number of excellent Odontoglossums, and other good
things. €
MM. Vacherot, Boissy St. Leger, France, were awarded a Gold Medak
for Orchids and Carnations, the former including Odontoglossum
citrosmum roseum, Odontioda Thwaitesii, Phalanopsis amabilis, a well-
flowered plant of Oncidium pulvinatum, and others.

M. Ch. Maron, Brunoy, France, received a Silver-gilt Medal for a good
group of Orchids, including Cattleya Kienastiana, a fine C. Hardyana,
Lzliocattleya Greenwoodii, Vanda ccerulea and Maroniz, and a number
of good Brassocattleyas.

MM. Jean Van de Putte et Cie, Ledeberg, received a Silver-gilt Medal
for a group of twenty-five well-flowered Oncidium Wentwerthianum, and
another for a collection of Orchids used by florists in decorative work.

OctorER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 313

MILTONIA CHARLESWORTHII.
THE annexed figure represents the beautiful hybrid Miltonia Charlesworthii
(M. Hyeana xX vexillaria memoria G. D. Owen), and is reproduced from a
photograph kindly sent by the raisers, Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.,

eSwortn

Haywards Heath. It will be remembered that Messrs. Char

Fig. 60. MILTONIA CHARLESWORTHII.

received a First-class Certificate for this plant at the R.H.S. Show held
Chelsea in May last, as recorded at page 218. The flowers are very large,
and of excellent shape, while the colour is bright rose-pink, with a remark-

able crimson-purple mask, resembling a butterfly in shape, at the base of

pee
e

314 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcroBER, 1913.

the lip, as in the handsome variety of M. vexillaria from which the pollen
was derived. Messrs. Charlesworth must be congratulated on having
raised such a sterling novelty, one of the comparatively small number
which have retained the handsome marking of the pollen parent. It may
be added that there is a beautiful variety of M. Charlesworthii, called
Mrs. Ralli, in the collection of Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom,
which received an Award of Merit from the R.H.S. on July 2gth last.
CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR OCTOBER.
By J. T. BARKER, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.

THE conditions which have prevailed generally during the present season
have been most favourable to the growth of most Orchids. The majority
of the plants having made satisfactory growth, everything now depends on
the way this growth is matured. When the plants are badly ripened the
flowering period is never so satisfactory as when the opposite conditions
prevail. Light and air are important factors in Orchid culture, and the
amount of sun-heat this season has been above the average, and has enabled
the grower to give abundant ventilation without letting the temperature
fall too low in the houses.

TEMPERATURES.—During the present month we must begin to place
the plants in their winter quarters, and the temperatures of the different
houses should be gradually reduced to the minimum degree. Suitable night
temperatures for this and the following months are as follows :—

East Indian house: 65° to 70° Fahr.

Cattleya and Mexican houses: 60° to 65°.

Intermediate house: 58° to 60°.

Odontoglossum or Cool house: 55° to 60°.

In the case of extremely cold weather a slightly lower temperature will
do no harm, and, in the case of extremely mild weather prevailing, a
slightly higher temperature will be beneficial. Slight variations in
temperatures do not matter, but when the fluctuations are excessive harm
may accrue.

ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE.—With the lower temperature, the humidity of
the atmosphere must be correspondingly reduced, but even at the present
season a genial atmosphere must still be maintained. A parched dry
atmosphere is as harmful as a cold damp one, and the extreme in either
case must be avoided.

VENTILATION.—The admission of fresh air to the houses on all favour-
able occasions is essential to the well-being of the plants, and therefore
should be practised whenever Opportunity occurs. Fresh air and light are
the principal factors in ripening and consolidating the growths of the
plants, and, as previously remarked, an ill-ripened plant cannot withstand

OcTorER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 315

the changeable conditions of the winter months as well as a thoroughly
matured one.

WATERING is another very important factor in Orchid culture, but the
plants vary to such an extent in their individual requirements that no
definite rule can be laid down. I should like to emphasise the great
diversity in the requirements of different Orchids as regards water at the
roots. Two things are mentioned in last month’s Orchid Review which
strongly impress this fact upon me, namely, the case of Cypripedium Rolfei
being grown in all loam in MM. Peeters’ establishment, and M. Delanghe
Vervaene’s Orchid culture in leaves. I have previously pointed out in
these pages the whole matter of watering and composts must go hand in
hand, so to speak, and whenever we alter the latter the former will also
require modifying in accordance with the nature of the compost. If any
uncertainty is felt as to the application of water to the roots at the present
season, it will be wise to err on the side of giving too little rather than too
much.

SHADING.—All permanent shading should now be dispensed with and
the plants inured to all the light possible. In those districts where the sun
has much power it may be advisable to run the blind down on bright days
for an hour or so, especially if there is any danger of the plants scorching,
but the growth being made under such ideal conditions this season they
will not be very susceptible to injury from this source.

ODoNTOGLossuMs.—The repotting of this family should be completed
as soon as possible, and those that are not in the desired condition will be
best held over until the early spring months. Owing to the many hybrids
of very complex parentage, the culture of this family is quite different from
what it used to be when only the species and natural hybrids were grown.
Plants are now found in all stages of growth at almost any season, especially
if the quantity grown is large, and they can therefore be repotted at almost
any season of the year, though it is always advisable to postpone the potting
of any of this family during a very hot period.

DENDROBIUMS, as they complete their growth, should be placed in the
resting house, as advised last month, and sufficient water should be given
them to prevent shrivelling at any time.

CaTTLEyas and allies should be repotted if they are in need of new
rooting material. The present will be found a most suitable season for
repotting many species and hybrids which have passed out of bloom. Any
that are seen to be pushing new roots may have attention in this respect.
I do not hesitate to repot any member of this large family at any season
provided new roots are observed to be pushing. The whole of the plants
repotted must have water applied to the compost with great care until the
new roots have re-established themselves in the new compost. This is the

316 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OcToBER, 1913.

rock on which many amateurs get wrecked in the cultivation of this
gorgeous family.

THunias which have lost their leaves may have the old dried-up pseudo-
bulbs cut away, the new being thoroughly cleaned and the plants put in a
dry moderately cool temperature to rest. A similar position to that given
to deciduous Dendrobiums will answer their requirements. In large
gardens these plants are most useful, and will repay any trouble bestowed
upon them to flower them satisfactorily.

CALANTHES.—All species and hybrids of deciduous Calanthes that are
pushing up their flower spikes from the base of the newly-made pseudobulbs
should be afforded space to develop, and as much light as possible, and also
receive water at the roots whenever they become dry. The late-flowering
varieties, such as C. Regnieri, should have an occasional watering with
weak liquid manure. When the flowers begin to expand drier conditions
must prevail, as a damp humid atmosphere soon causes them to spot
or become discoloured and fall off. Whilst opening their flowers a
temperature of at least 65° should be maintained, but as soon as the
blooms are expanded the plants may be placed in a house with a
temperature a few degrees lower, where they will last much longer in
good condition. As the plants cast their foliage the water supply at the
roots should be reduced.

C@LOGYNE CRISTATA and its varieties, which have now completed their
growth, must have the plentiful supply of water hitherto afforded them
considerably curtailed, as until after flowering they will only require
sufficient to keep the pseudobulbs plump and healthy. At no season of the
year, however, should they be allowed to become quite dry. At the present
season they should receive all the light and air that can be afforded them
in the Cool Intermediate house. It is not advisable to allow those plants
to flower that were made up last spring. unless they are well rooted and
re-established.

Vanpas.—The end of the present month is the best time of the year to
thoroughly overhaul plants of V. tricolor and V. suavis, especially those
that have grown leggy and require shaking out of their rooting material.
There will be far less loss of foliage when this operation is undertaken at
this season than when postponed to a later period. These plants must not
be exposed to strong light at any time, and a cool, damp, and shaded
position in the Cattleya house will be of the greatest assistance in
‘re-establishing themselves without loss of foliage. Although not such
favourites as they once were, a well-grown plant with foliage down to the
pot is a delightful object. Clean sphagnum moss mixed with small broken
crocks forms a suitable compost, and it is very important to fix the plants
firmly in their pots, and to prevent the taller specimens from swaying

OcToBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 317

about, as if it occurs they will surely lose their bottom leaves. Those
plants that are well clothed with leaves, and only require new compost,
should have the old carefully removed and replaced with new. These
plants always succeed much better when stood upon a damp base, and
their surroundings should always be kept moist. V. Kimballiana and V.
Watsonii are developing flower spikes, and should have sufficient water to
keep the sphagnum in a green and growing condition, but when the flowers
are fully open the amount of moisture at the roots should be considerably
reduced and only sufficient given to keep the leaves firm and plump.

TRICHOPILIAS flower at various times of the year, and should therefore
be repotted at different seasons, whenever the different species are producing
new roots from the base of the new pseudobulbs. T. suavis and T.
Backhouseana are most generally grown, but there are others, such as
T. fragrans, T. coccinea, and T. tortilis, that are worthy of cultivation.
These plants grow best suspended near the roof glass in the Intermediate
house, and a similar compost to that given to Cattleyas will answer their
requirements. T. fragrans thrives during the summer months in the Cool
house; but should be returned to the Intermediate house on the approach
of cold weather. Whilst growing actively the plants should be afforded a
plentiful supply of water at the roots, but when the season’s growth is
completed much less will suffice. They delight in a supply of fresh air at
all seasons.

GENERAL REMARKS.—At this season of the year every opportunity must
be taken to push on all necessary work, which is often very pressing,
especially if room is limited. The cleaning and the placing of the plants
in their winter quarters takes up much time, and if it is to be effectual must
be thoroughly done.

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on September gth, when there was a good display of Orchids
for the season, and the awards consisted of three medals, two Awards of
Merit, and three Cultural Commendations.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
and Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), J. Wilson Potter, R. G. Thwaites, A.
McBean, T. Armstrong, W. Cobb, C. H. Curtis, J. Charlesworth, W. H.
Hatcher, H. G. Alexander, W. P. Bound, W. H. White, S. W. Flory, W.
Bolton, Gurney Wilson, R. A. Rolfe, Stuart Low, F. Sander, and Sir
Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),

exhibited a very large clump of Spathoglottis zebrina (Fortunei X plicata),

318 THE: ORCHID: REVIEW. [OcTOBER, 1913.

containing about three dozen plants, the majority with yellow flowers, but
two or three having white sepals and petals, while a few others were tinged
with lilac. All of them most resembled the seed parent in shape.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent a fine plant of
Odontoglossum Ceres, with seven flowers, together with the brilliant little
Sophrocattleya Saxa and Thwaitesii.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (er. Mr Er; G.
Alexander), sent a fine form of the brilliant Leeliocattleya Lustre, having a
broad purple band at the apex of the petals.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. W. H. White),
sent a plant of the striking Listrostachys caudata.

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), sent two
plants of the beautiful Cattleya Hardyana Countess of Derby, with white
sepals and petals and a rich purple lip, Brassocattleya Pittiana and
heatonensis, Cattleya Thayeriana and Source d’Or, and a few others.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Leelio-
cattleya Anthela (L.-c. Phryne x C. Warscewiczii), having yellow sepals and
petals, and a light rose lip, with a paler margin and a few yellow lines on
the disc.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham (gr. Mr. J. M. Black),
sent Odontoglossum Wilsonii (Vuylstekei x Rolfez), a hybrid of good
shape, having yellow sepals and petals blotched with red-brown, and the
lip white with some purple markings at the base.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent
Lzliocattleya Mrs. Donald MacMaster (L.-c. luminosa x C. Dowiana
aurea), a pretty hybrid, having Indian yellow sepals and petals with darker
veins, and a rich ruby red lip.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a very fine
group, including a dozen plants of the brilliant Leliocattleya George
Woodhams, L.-c. bletchleyensis, L.-c. Schroederze Orchidurst var., a very
fine form, L.-c. Rainbow (C. Iris x! L.-c. Phryne), L.-c. Armstrongize
Orchidhurst var. (L.-c. George Woodhams x C. Iris), a pretty hybrid from
L.-c. Myra X Nysa, Cattleya Prince John (Hardyana x Dowiana Rosita),
some fine C. Iris, Germania, and Hardyana, a fine form of Miltonioda
Harwoodii, Odontioda Bradshawiz and Charlesworthii, Brassocattleya
Maronie, and the interesting little Kefersteinia laminata (Silver-gilt Flora
Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a choice group,
including thé handsome Odontonia Edna, some good Dendrobium
Phalenopsis, Oncidium Forbesii, Kramerianum, and incurvum, Cycnoches
Egertonianum and chlorochilon, the brilliant Ornithidium coccineum with
three well-flowered shoots, Leliocattleya Colmaniana, Miltonia vexillaria,

|
|
|
|

OcTOBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 319

Epidendrum ciliare, Calanthe violacea, some good Brassocattleya a
Spathoglottis plicata Micholitzii, Sophrolelia heat is, Leelia I
Bulbophyllum grandiflorum, some brilliant GRestiedas Odontoglossnn
Uroskinneri, and others (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a good group, including
examples of Ccelogyne pandurata, Brassocattleya Veitchii Queen Alexandra,
Cattleya Rothschildiana albescens, some good C. iridescens, C. Euphrasia,
C. Nestor (Harrisoniana xX Iris), and others (Silver Banksian Medal),

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent good examples of Odontioda
Charlesworthii, O. Bradshawie, and O. Vuylstekeew Brightness, the latter
with some white markings on the segments, Brassocattleya Maronii
var. Distinction, a pretty white form with a purple line on the lip,
B.-c. Maronie, Dendrobium Dearei, Leliocattleya George Woodhams,
some good Odontoglossum crispum, and Adoglossum Juno, a remarkable
hybrid from Odontoglossum Edwardii and Ada aurantiaca, which was
referred to the Scientific Committee.

M.Maurice Mertens, Ghent, sent a white form of Cattleya Hardyana,
with six unnamed hybrid Cattleyas, and two blotched Odontoglossums.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, sent plants of Catasetum viridiflavum,
C. microglossum, Angrzecum infundibulare, Lzeliocattleya Phoenix, and an
unnamed species of Warrea.

Messrs. Swan & Price, St. Albans, sent plants of Cattleya Hardyana,
Cypripedium Swanii (bingleyense X Swanianum), most like the former, C.
W.R. Lee, Shillianum, Olga Bagshaw, Princess, and Transvaal.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

LaLIOCATTLEYA GEORGE WooDHAMS (C. Hardyana x L. purpurata).
—A very fine hybrid, most like the latter parent in general character, and
having mauve-purple sepals and petals, and a deep claret-purple lip. The
plant bore three racemes and twelve flowers. Exhibited by Messrs. Arm-
strong & Brown.

ODONTIODA SEYMOURL® ORCHIDHURST VAR. (Charlesworthii X Brad-
shawiz).—A handsome hybrid, most like the former, and having crimson-
ted sepals and petals, and the lip with some buff-coloured markings at the
sides, and a yellow crest. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS.

BULBOPHYLLUM MEpDus#.—To Mr. G. B. Lees, gardener to E. de Q.
Quincey, Esq., Oakwood, Chislehurst, for a very fine specimen, bearing
seventeen of its remarkable inflorescences.

ZYGOPETALUM MAXILLARE.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to
Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., for a beautifully-grown specimen,
bearing seven racemes of numerous flowers.

ZYGOPETALUM MAXILLARE VAR. SANDERIANUM.—To “se W. H. White,

320 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OCTOBER, 1913.

Orchid grower to Sir Trevor Lawrence,’ Bart., K.C.V.O., for a fine
specimen, bearing six well-developed racemes.

At the meeting held on September 23rd there was a fine display of
Orchids, and the awards consisted of seven medals, two Awards of Merit,
and one Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the. Chair),
and Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Sir Harry J. Veitch, J. Wilson. Potter,
R. G. Thwaites, F. J. Hanbury, A. McBean, T. Armstrong, C: H. Curtis,
W. Cobb, J. Charlesworth, W. H. Hatcher, J. Cypher, W. P. Bound,
J. E. Shill, H. G. Alexander, Arthur Dye, W..H. White, S. W. Flory,
W. Bolton, Gurney Wilson, Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., R. A. Rolfe, and
C, -J, ‘Lucas.

Before the commencement of business the Chairman alluded in feeling
terms ‘to the loss which the Committee had sustained by the death of
Mr. John S. Moss, whose decease was so deeply deplored by Orchid lovers.
_ H.-S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), received a
Silver Flora Medal for a fine group, in which Cattleyas and Leliocattleyas
were conspicuous, and included C. Dietrichiana, Pittiana, Venus, Carmen,
Iris,and Warscewiczii, L.-c. callistoglossa, L.-c. Clonia var. Amy Leemann,
L.-c. luminosa, several L.-c. Bryan, and others, with Odontoglossum grande,
Rolfez, and a few O. crispum, Leelia splendens, Sophrolelia heatonensis,
Cypripedium Sanderiano-Curtisii, and a few others.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham Hill (gr. Mr. Black),
received a Silver Banksian Medal for a good group, containing over twenty
plants of Cattleya Adula, showing a wide range of variation, with a few
other good things. .

G. .W. Bird, Esq., Manor House, West Wickham (gr. Mr. Redden),
sent a very richly-coloured form of Cattleya Freya (Mantinii x Dowiana
aurea). = ,

Walter Cobb, Esq., Normanhurst, Rusper (gr. Mr. Salter), sent a good
Cypripedium villoso-Rothschildianum, with two twin-flowered scapes, the
flowers being striped with red-brown ona yellowish ground.

E. H, Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent a few showy little
plants, namely, Odontoglossum Woodroffe, with three very richly-coloured
flowers, O. Twyford Gem (Rossii rubescens X_ formosum), another richly-
coloured thing, a fine O. Ceres, with seven flowers, a good Sophrocattleya
Doris, and “a form of S.-c. Blackii with one very large orange-coloured
flower. ™ Re Gag Me eae

W._R.. Lee, Esq., Plumpton, Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), sent a plant
of Cypripedium Niobe-Leeanum, with two flowers, most like C. Niobe in
general character, but the sides of the dorsal sepal suffused with purple.

|

OctoReR, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW.

Fig. 61. ONcIDIUM CORYNEPHORUM (see p- 323).

322 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [OCTOBER, 1913.

Mrs. Temple, Leyswood, Groomsbridge (gr. Mr. Buxton), sent a fine
specimen of Cypripedium Ashburtoniz, bearing twenty-four scapes, about
fifteen of them being twin-flowered.

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group of
Orchids, including samples of Cattleya Iris, Atalanta, Armstrongiz, suavior,
and others, Lzeliocattleya Marquis de Wavrin, Duchess, eximia, and a fine
hybrid from L.-c. Haroldiana x C. Dowiana aurea, with purple sepals and
petals and a dark blackish purple lip, with another from C. Harrisoniana
Xx L.-c. George Woodhams; also Brassocattleya Maronie, Cypripedium
pedium Niobe, Victory, Holdenii, Baron Schréder, and a few others (Silver
Flora Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a fine group,
including Angraecum infundibulare, Listrostachys Chailluana, Odonto-
glossum armainvillierense xanthotes, Dendrobium Dearei, Oncidium
incurvum and cheirophorum, Odontonia Lairessee, Oncidioda Charles-
worthii, Zygopetalum maxillare Gautieri, Vanda ccerulea, Epidendrum
vitellinum autumnale, Miltonia vexillaria robusta with an eight-flowered
spike, Catasetum macrocarpum, Odontioda Brewii with a very large clear
crimson flower, and the crest of the lip orange, fine examples of Leelio-
cattleya callistoglossa, Dominiana, Bola, Colmaniana, and Thyone,
Cypripedium Rossetti, Fairrieanum, leyburnense, and A. de Lairesse,
Cattleya Parthenia, Antiope, Adula, Alameda, and Sophrolelia Gratrixiz
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a fine group, including the
striking Odontonia McNabiana (O. Edwardii ¢ x M, Bleuana 3), bearing
a spike of ten rich violet-purple flowers with an orange yellow crest, a fine
Miltonia St. Andre, Sophrocatlelia Medeia, Cattleya Iris, nobilis, Mantinii,
mollis, Mrs. Pitt, and Acestis, Dendrobium Dearei, Saccolabium acutifolium
with ten inflorescences, Coelogyne brunnea and Mooreana, two fine Vanda
coerulea, Leeliocattleya Phoenix, Cypripedium Pyrrha (Thalia x Baron
Schréder) and C. Maudiz, the rare Bulbophyllum bisetum, and a few
Odontoglossums (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged an interesting group,
including a fine example of Habenaria Susanne, Oncidium incurvum
album, Odontoglossum grande, the rare Chondrorhyncha _fimbriata
Bulbophyllum grandiflorum, Miltonia vexillaria Leopoldii, M. Phalznopsis,
and M. spectabilis Moreliana, Cypripedium Niobe superbum, Boltonii,
triumphans, Felicity, Argo-Fairrieanum, Thalia giganteum, Leonie
Gratrix’s var., Earl Egerton, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged an interesting group, including
several good examples of Cattleya Dowiana aurea, Hardyana, Iris, and
Minucia, C. iridescens, Thurgoodiana, Adula, and Peetersiz, with Brasso-

OcToBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 323

cattleya heatonensis, Cypripedium triumphans, A. de Lairesse, and others
(Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Mansell and Hatcher, Rawdon, E. Yorks, exhibited Odontioda
rawdoniensis (Odontoglossum armainvillierense x Odontioda Charles-
worthii), a very brilliant and promising hybrid. The tiny plant bore a
single flower, with very broad deep cherry-red sepals and petals, and
a three-lobed lip, the crest of which was orange, and there was also a tint
of orange on the front lobe.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA CYBELE (Lueddemanniana var. Baron Schréder x Gaskel-
liana alba).—A fine blush white hybrid, with a large crimson-purple blotch
on the front lobe of the lip, and the throat yellow. Exhibited by E. H.
Davidson, Esq.

L2LIOCATTLEYA ARMADA (L.-c. luminosa x C. fulvescens).—A very
pretty hybrid, with fawn-coloured sepals and petals, and an open purple lip,
with many pale yellow lines. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford,
K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. H. G. Alexander).

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

ONCIDIUM CORYNEPHORUM.—To Messsrs. Armstrong and Brown, for
a very finely-grown plant, bearing a panicle with seven side branches, and
an aggregate of twenty-five of its beautiful white and purple flowers. This
beautiful species received a First-class Certificate from the R.H.S. in
October, 1905, when exhibited from the collection of E. Ashworth, Esq.,
Harefield Hall, Wilmslow. Its history was given at Pp. 334-336 of our
thirteenth volume. The figure given at page 321 represents Mr. Ashworth’s
plant about one-fourth natural size.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.
AT the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on August 2ist,
the members of Committee present were :—Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the
Chair), Messrs. J. Bamber, E. H. Davidson, A. G. Ellwood, H. Hanmer,
A. J. Keeling, D. McLeod, W. Shackleton, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward,
G. Weatherby, A. Warburton, and H. Arthur (Secretary).

R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), staged a nice mixed
§toup, to which a Silver-gilt Medal was awarded. Odontoglossums were
well represented, including O. crispum xanthotes Charlesworthii, O. c.
Perfection and O. c. Wellmanii, with Odontioda Charlesworthii, Miltonia
vexillaria superba, Cattleya Gaskelliana alba, Hardyana, and Caduceus,
Cypripedium Maudiz, Transvaal, Harrisianum superbum, Oporto, Rolfei,
and Lord Derby, a fine example of Vanda ccerulea carrying twenty-four
flowers on two spikes, and others.

A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), was awarded a

324 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Ocroper, 1913.

Silver Medal for a good group, including Odontoglossum . crispum
vars. Queen Victoria and Warburtonianum, ardentissimum Vanguard,
Odontioda Charlesworthii, Miltonia Schroederee, Cattleya Leopoldii and
Warscewiczii Sanderiana, Cypripedium A. de Lairesse, gigas Corndean
Hall var., Shillianum, Maudie, Olga Bagshaw, Actzus revolutum, and
others.

Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), was
awarded a Silver Medal for a small group of Cypripediums, including C.
Olivia, Lord Derby, Frau Ida Brandt, Chapmanii, Baron Schréder, Rich-
manii, cherubicum, Lord Ossulston Crombleholme’s var., leyburnense
magnificum, and others.

Mr. D. McLeod, Chorlton-cum-Hardy, sent Odontoglossum crispum
Reine Blanche.

Mr. J. Birchenall, Alderley Edge, sent Cypripedium Mars.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Odontoglossum Woodroffez (O. Rossii rubescens X Queen Alexandra).
—The best of its kind, with large flowers of good colour, and well spotted,
and Cattleya Harrisoniana alba Davidson’s var., a good round flower, with
the lip broad at the base, both from Mr. E. H. Davidson, Twyford, Berks.

Odontoglossum crispum virginale Ashlands var., with well-formed
flowers of good substance, from R. Ashworth, Esq.

AWARD OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Muriel Hollington, a nice variety, with large flowers, from

the Rev. J. Crombleholme.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.
By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
WINTER treatment must now be the order of the day, and for this and the
ensuing month the average temperatures should be: By day 55° to 65°
Fahr.; by night 53° to 60° Fahr.

Obviously the above figures can Only be regularly maintained by the
employment of artificial heating, for it is better to have the pipes warmed
and thereby make ventilation possible, than to defer using fire heat, and
endeavouring to keep the house sufficiently warm by closing and relying on
the heat of the sun. One of the main secrets of successful Orchid culture
depends on keeping the temperatures as even as possible, and in having
inside the house a nice buoyant atmosphere.

As the days are now beginning to draw in, less water must be applied to
the plants, and if in doubt as to whether a plant needs water or not, my
advice to the amateur is to wait until the following day. The majority of
the failures sustained by beginners in Orchid culture are due to keeping
their plants in a sodden condition during the long dull winter months. An

Seaiiapceansrmpeaer >x-

ee

OcToBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 325

overdose during the summer does not do anything like the same amount of
harm, as moisture quickly evaporates at that season. Nothing is more
detrimental to the health of an Orchid than to have a mass of chilly damp
moss round its roots, and for this reason I always prefer to have the
sphagnum well mixed together with the other ingredients of the compost,
as it is then more evenly distributed and does not get into a sodden mass.

Damping down will now have to be restricted to twice a day, when
sunny weather prevails, and only once should fogs and continuous rain
occur. The roller blinds may now be removed and stored away in a dry
shed for the winter, as no further shading will be necessary.

The principal treatment this month will consist in carefully going over
every plant, sponging its leaves with tepid rain water, cutting away any
dead or decaying portions, and in keeping a sharp look out for insect pests.

Cymbidiums will now probably be throwing up their long flower spikes,
at least such varieties as Tracyanum, Winnianum, early Lowianum, and
some of the beautiful hybrids of insigne, notably Doris, Gottianum,
Schlegelii, and Pauwelsii. These plants should be placed in as light a
position as possible, watering them well and giving once a week a dose of
weak diluted cow manure.

It is now, in my opinion, too late to attempt the repotting of Odonto-
glossums, and therefore any which were not done last month had better be
left over until the following spring. A plant of this genus, if repotted now,
has not the necessary amount of time to become properly re-established
before the winter sets in and often fails to recover itself until the bright
days of spring commence, and, besides causing the cultivator much worry,
several months of growth are wasted.

During the winter months it will be found a good plan to erect a shelf a
few inches from the roof glass at the eaves of the house, and to place here
any small seedlings and also weakly plants, where they will benefit from
obtaining all possible light. Special care, however, must be taken to avoid
a chill when the plants are so close to the glass, and it may be advisable to
remove them during frosty weather.

—_—>0<2>—_—.
THE WALLICHIAN HERBARIUM.
THE last issue of the Kew Builletin contains an important account of the
Wallichian Herbarium, which was originally presented to the Linnean
Society of London by the Court of Directors of the East India Company,
and which has since been held in trust by the latter for the general benefit
of science. The Herbarium contains an extensive series of Indian plants,
including a large number of Orchids, which were described by Dr. Lindley
in his Genera and Species of Orchidaceous Plants. A demand for additional
space led the Society to desire that the collection might find another home,

326 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Ocroper, 1913.

and at a Special General Meeting held on April 3rd, 1913, the Herbarium
was offered to Kew. The offer was accepted, and the transfer of the
Herbarium took place on July 11th last. The mahogany-faced cabinets in
which the plants were contained were the property of the Society, but these
were transferred to Kew in consequence of the generous gift, by Sir Frank
Crisp, Bart., of the sum at which they were valued by the Council, and
this gift allowed the Herbarium to be transferred intact. It forms a very
valuable addition to the Kew collections.

ORCHIDS AT KEW.

CYPRIPEDIUMS are making quite a bold display, especially in the Warm
division, where a number of species and hybrids are in flower. The
charming C. Maudie (Lawrenceanum Hyeanum xX callosum Sandere)
attracts much attention. Another hybrid which should be useful
commercially is C. gigas, as it is very floriferous, and the flowers are bold
and the dorsal sepal very large and good in shape and colour. C.
Franconia (callosum x Rothschildianum) is another splendid example, the
latter parent being decidedly favoured, and, like C. gigas, it is usually twin-
flowered. C. Minnie (Curtisii x concolor) is much like C. Curtisii in
shape, but has more of the colouring of C. concolor. Among. other
good things in the same house are C. Veronicus, St. Alban, Rossetti,
Kubele, Bella, Asburtoniz and Harrisianum superbum. A nice batch of
Phalznopsis Esmeralda are flowering freely, and these plants do best near
the glass of the warm Intermediate house.

In the Cool house there are some good forms of Cypripedium Charles-
worthii, Niobe Westonbirt var., Baron Schréder, Charlesianum, and
several plants of the beautiful C. insigne var. Sandere. Lelia monophylla
is a very useful subject for the Cool house, and is easily grown. The
flowers are bright orange-scarlet, and will last quite six weeks in perfection.
A good specimen of Pleurothallis pulchella is flowering freely, producing
two and sometimes three spikes at the apex of each growth, with numerous
pale green flowers. Several Miltonias are in bloom, the richly-coloured
M. Cognianxie being especially fine, while the variety bicolor has the
sepals and petals almost white, and the lip prettily suffused with purple.
Two plants of M. candida promise a fine display of bloom, and one
specimen has twenty-two good spikes. One or two other plants which
brighten the Cool house just now are Miltonioda Ajax (Cochlioda
Neetzliana X Miltonia Schroederiana), two plants of Odontioda Charles-
worthii, one being a remarkably fine variety. Several Odontoglossums are
in flower, including some good plants of the popular O. grande and the
diminutive O. Krameri.

In the Cattleya house a numerous series of showy Cattleyas and

ae

OcTOBER, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 327

Leliocattleyas are in flower, and one of the best of the latter is L.-c. Priam
(C. Harrisoniana X L.-c. callistoglossa), having soft pink flowers. Govenia
lagenophora is a plant of great botanical interest, for it has a large sheath
which almost envelopes the erect bulb and forms a receptacle for water.
This sheath should be kept full of water during the growing season. The
flowers are curious in colour, the ovary being bright purple, the sepals
yellow, the petals purple intermixed with yellow, and the lip yellow with
three brown spots on the upper side. Oncidium ornithorrhynchum and its
pure white var. album are flowering well, and several] plants of O. varicosum
are making a fine display. The three pretty little Pleiones, lagenaria,
maculata and precox, are again in bloom, with a group of Vanda
Kimballiana, a good plant of Epidendrum Ruckere with seven racemes,
E. Cooperianum, Maxillaria grandiflora, and various other interesting
autumn-blooming things.

ORCHIDS IN SEASON.
A VERY pretty white form of Miltonia spectabilis with a purple base to the
lip, is sent from the collection of W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield,
Edgbaston. It is said to have been included with other plants as
M. Moreliana dark var. at the Sale at which it was obtained, but proves to
be the original M. spectabilis, Lindl. The two are known to grow
together, and although the white was first described we are inclined to
think the other is the commoner, and thus typical, form. If the plants
were imported this might account for this mixture, for such a case was
tecorded in our ‘pages in 1906 (O.R., xiv. p. 297), when M. spectabilis
var. radians and Moreliana were figured together. All are charming
autumn-flowering Orchids.
ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, West , during October, on the
7th and 21st, when the Orchid Committee will See at the usual hour, 12

o'clock noon.

Meetings of the Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will
be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on October 16th and 3oth.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection of
members and the public from r to 4 o’clock p.m.

The impending retirement of Sir Harry J. Veitch and the disposal of
the nursery business of Messrs. James Veitch & Sons of the Chelsea,
Coombe Wood, Langley and Feltham Nurseries was recently announced.
We now learn that the seed business, carried on at Chelsea for the past

328 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [Ocroprr, 1913.

sixty years has been purchased by Messrs. Sutton & Sons, Reading, also
the principal part of the seed grounds at Langley, and will be transferred
to the latter as from October 1st, 1913. Messrs. Veitch’s Nursery trade
will, however be carried on at Chelsea, Langley, and Feltham until Sir
Harry J. Veitch retires altogether from business.

The Langley Orchid Nursery of Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, with the
entire stock of Orchids, hybrid and otherwises has been acquired as from
October Ist, 1913, by Mr. Sidney Flory, Twickenham, and Mr. HANg ©
Black, Streatham Hill, who will carry on the business under the style of
Messry. Flory and Black, Orchid Nursery, Slough, Bucks. Both the
partners have a long experience, Mr. Flory having carried on the Orchid
Nursery, Twickenham, since the death of Mr. H. A. Tracy, with whom he
had long been associated, and Mr. Black having been for many years
Orchid grower to R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham Hill,
where Orchid raising has long been a speciality. We wish the new firm
success, and it starts under very favourable auspices, for Messrs. Veitch
have an extensive stock. of choice hybrids.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

BULBOPHYLLUM MEDUS&.—Garden, 1913, p. 188, with fig.

CATASETUM MICROGLOssuM, Rolfe.—Bot. Mag., t. 8514.

CATTLEYA LAWRENCEANA. oan. Chron. 1913, li. p. 156, coloured
plate.

CATTLEYA MENDELII QUEEN ALEXANDRA.—Journ. Hort., 1913, ll. p-
303, with fig.

DENDROBIUM DeEAREI MCBEAN’s vaAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 725;
with fig.

L&LIOCATTLEYA GEORGE WoopuHamMs.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 705, with
fig.

ODONTIODA BRUGENSIS VAR. EILEEN.—Gard. Mag., 1913, pp. 649, 662,
with fig.

VANDA SANDERIANA mEcCneS) .—Aorticulture, 1913, p. 361, with fig.

He dahl TO CORRESPONDENTS.

{Orchids are named an d ques aise oe here a ee Bes ett Jost aenede are
requested to give the native country or parent, of plants ED. postcar ust 0¢
sent if a A eb Ly 4 post is desired ( of Sor reply posteards hdl : ee > Subjects “of F sais
interest wil ealt with in the body of th rk}.

made enquiries dea a plant of Renanthera Rohaniana, but have
not yet been able rose secure one. We oa 2 on if any of our correspondents who may
have a aie ies disposal will communicate

F.S.—Lissochilus stylites, Rchb. f. aod} Plearothallis ne sym ca Rchb. f.

with thanks.—Ch. & Co. ; G.B.S.

es received.—Descriptive Ca’ aie Otter of Orchids fron, Mesctt. (As J.
Keeling & st Bradford, Yorks., containing a good selection of species and hybrids, with
prices, and a number of illustrations.

ee eee
<<a

|

aa oA a ms

5

THE ORCHID REVIEW.

VoL. XXI.] NOVEMBER, 10973. [No. 251.

CATASETUM DARWINIANUM,

‘Last autumn a plant of Catasetum Darwinianum at Kew produced an

inflorescence with three male flowers, a single female, and one other in a
transition state, as recorded at page 316 of our last volume. A photograph
and account of the plant have since been given, together with a history of
sexuality in the genus (Rolfe in Kew Bulletin, 1913, p. 99-102, with plate).
The phenomena illustrated were long a profound puzzle to botanists and
plants bearing female flowers were originally referred to a distinct genus by
Lindley, under the name of Monachanthus, while the males of others,
structually identical with C. Darwinianum, were referred to Myanthus,
because differing from the original Catasetum macrocarpum, Rich. When
at length an inflorescence ‘was sent to him by the Duke of Devonshire,
combining two of his supposed genera, he remarked that Myanthus and
Monachanthus must be restored to Catasetum, adding: ‘‘ But which of the
species have their masks on, and which show their real faces, a haw
will not presume to guess.”

The question was the subject of a noteworty paper by Darwin, “ On the
Three remarkable Sexual Forms of Catasetum tridentatum,” published in
1862, in which he sought to show that C. tridentatum, Hook., produced
three different kinds of flowers, representing male, female, and
hermaphrodite states of the same species. He established the fact that
the sportive character of Catasetum, or its ‘curious habit of suddenly
producing flowers of a totally different kind on the same plant, was simply
an abnormal combination of different sexual forms in the same individual,
but he failed to discover that the name Monachanthus viridis included more
than one species, in fact he misread some remarks of Schomburgk, who had
stated that Monachanthus alone bore seeds, and had expressed the opinion
that the three genera formed but a single one. The consequence was that
Darwin, while establishing the fact that Catasetum was male and
Monachanthus female, thought that Myanthus barbatus was a
hermaphrodite form of the same species. This view passed as correct
for many years, until a re-examination of all the records, aided by some
fresh material, enabling the writer to clear the matter in a paper “ On the

32

330 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NoveMBER, 1913.

sexual Forms of Catasetum, with special reference to the remarks of Darwin
and others.”

It was shown that the females of three different Catasetums passed
under the name of Monachanthus viridis, and that Myanthus barbatus was
the male of one of them, and distinct from C. tridentatum, with which it
had been confused. It was also shown that the species could be arranged
in four very natural sections, Eucatasetum, Myanthus, Ecirrhose, and
Pseudocatasetum, whose characters were given.

Catasetum Darwinianum is a native of Mt. Roraima, whence it was
introduced by Messrs. Sander, and flowered at Kew in 1887, producing a
male and a female inflorescence on either side of the same pseudobulb,
thus being very different from the condition in which it more recently
flowered. A painting, natural side, of the plant as it flowered originally is
preserved at Kew. The species was named in compliment to the great
naturalist, Charles Darwin, but was not one of those investigated by him in
his work.

At the present time the females of some twenty species are known,
representing about a third of the genus, so that there is still plenty of scope
for those who may be able to observe the plants in their native wilds or to
cultivate them at home. It is greatly to be desired that this blank in our
knowledge should be filled up.

The economy of fertilisation in the genus isremarkable. The propulsion
of the polinia by means of the sensitive antennze was fully explained by
Darwin, and the method of fertilisation in C. tridentatum was afterwards
described and illustrated by Criiger, who was able to observe the species in
Trinidad, where it is common. The visiting insect is described as a large
humble bee, noisy and quarrelsome, which visits the flowers of both sexes
for the purpose of gnawing some cellular tissue in the interior of the sac.
On visiting the male flowers the pollen masses are thrown on the back of
the insect, and Criiger had often seen them flying about with this peculiar-
looking ornament on them. On subsequently visiting the female flower the
pollinia were caught by the upper margin of the stigmatic cavity, and were
left behind on the retreat of the insect. The function of the sensitive
antennz in the sections Eucatasetum and Myanthus is thus apparent, but
these organs are not developed in the more primitive Ecirrhose and
Pseudocatasetum, so that some other mechanism must be available, which
it would be interesting to work out.

The scarcity of female as compared with male flowers is well known, in
connection with which the following note by Rodway is suggestive: “‘ In
some species of Catasetum there are male and female flowers, quite distinct
in appearance the one from the other, and, what is most curious, borne on
the same plant at different times. It appears as if the Orchid is able to

NOVEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 331

choose whichever of these it is able to bring to perfection. The male’
neccessarily requires a less continuous strain, as it is saved from the labour
of ripening the capsules, which takes several months. When, therefore,
the plant is comparatively weak, only male flowers are produced, but when
the pseudobulbs are plump and strong, females.”

Catasetum is one of the most remarkable genera in the whole family,
and is only paralleled by the allied genus Cycnoches, whose history was
given at pp. 269-274 of our seventh volume. In Mormodes, the other
genus of the group, the sexes are not separated.

CATTLEYA LODDIGESII ALBA.

A VERY fine flower of this chaste variety is sent from the collection of
Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt, by Mr. Alexander,
who remarks that it is one of a spike of seven flowers. It was obtained
under the name of Cattleya Harrisoniana alba Stanley’s variety; but the
absence of the characteristic bright yellow corrugated disc shows that it
belongs to C. Loddigesii; of which it has precisely the shape and the very
ample side lobes. The flower has an expanse of over four inches, and the
petals are over an inch broad. The colour is white, with a pale sulphur
tinge on the base of the front lobe of the lip, which colour extends round
the side lobes near the margin.

The corresponding form of C. Harrisoniana is known as C. Harrisoniana
candida, and has been known for upwards of sixty years. Its original
appearance is uncertain, but it was mentioned by Mr. B. S.. Williams
under the name of C. candida (Gard. Chron., 1851, p. 543), as a beautiful
autumn-flowering white variety, and afterwards it was referred to a variety
of C. Harrisoniana. A more definite record was given by Mr. John Day,
who drew it in July, 1863 (Orch. Draw., iii. t. 41), and again ten years later
(1.c., xviii. t..29). He remarks: “I received this from Messrs. Loddiges & Co.
in 1852, being one of fifty Orchids I bought from them for £50, and which
Mr. Conrad Loddiges said he hoped and expected would be the means of
inoculating me with the love of Orchids. It is a mere variety—white-
coloured—of Cattleya Harrisoniana. It has the same corrugated lip, and
is precisely the same in all respects but colour. It is a very charming
thing, and blooms in August and September when it is much wanted.”
The typical C. Harrisoniana was also one of the fifty, as recorded by Mr.
Day when painting it (Orch. Draw., xi. t. 89), and from this circumstance
we may infer that Messrs. Loddiges obtained it in an importation of C.
Harrisoniana.. It is unfortunate that the names of C. Loddigesii and C.
Harrisoniana have been transposed in some collections—probably through
the sale of imported plants under the wrong names—but' they were
correctly understood in Mr. Day’s time, and he also drew C. Loddigesii

332 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NoveMBER, 1913.
(Orch. Draw., xviii. t. 27), with details of the lip, to show the difference
between the two. The history of the confusion has already been pointed
out (O.R., vi. p. 299; Xil. pp. 353-356). R. A. ROLFE.
ORCHIDS IN SEASON.

FLowErRs of two handsome hybrids, flowering for the first time, are sent
from the collection of H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill, by Mr. F.
W. Thurgood. The first is Brassocattleya Pittiana, obtained from Cattleya
Whiteleye x Brassocattleya heatonensis. The flower most resembles the
Cattleya parent, both in shape and in the brilliant colour, the latter a
character in which ‘many Brassocattleyas are deficient. The sepals and
petals are broad, 2} inches long, and bright rose-purple, while the lip is
rose-purple, with some light yellow in the throat. There are two seedlings,
the lighter-coloured one having the lip more undulate and fringed than the
other. A seedling of this batch flowered last year, and was recorded at
page 338 of our last volume. The latter is called Brassocattleya William
Pitt, and is derived from Cattleya Octave Doin x B.-c. Mariz. The
flower is considerably larger than in the preceding, the sepals and petals
being 34 inches long, and lilac-rose in colour, while the lip is rather darker,
well-fringed, and with some light yellow in the throat. Both should
develop into good things when the plants become strong. ;

Flowers of a handsome Brassocattleya are sent from the collection of
G. Marchetti, Esq., Manor Heath, Halifax, by Mr. J. C. Johnson, who
remarks that the plant is labelled C. granulosa x aurea X B. Digbyana.
This record, we believe, means Cattleya Pittiana (granulosa x Dowiana
aurea) X Brassavola Digbyana. The flowers are much like those of B.-c.
Leemanniz in general character. having light yellow sepals and petals, and
a much fringed lip, with some reddish suffusion. The chief difficulty we
see is that the lip is not strongly three-lobed as in B.-c. Pluto, the hybrid
from C. granulosa. Theoretically this hybrid should be intermediate
between B.-c. Pluto and B.-c. Leemanniz. Perhaps it may be possible to
verify the parentage in future, and to see what other seedlings from the
batch are like.

A flower of the charming Cattleya Venus (Iris x Dowiana aurea) is
sent from the collection of Dr. Hans Goldschmidt, Essen-Ruhr,
Germany. It is most like the C. Dowiana parent in shape, having an
entire crimson lip, with yellow veining, and a rosy suffusion in the sepals
and petals.

A flower of a brilliant form of Lzliocattleya Robsoniz has been sent
from the collection of E. Ashworth, Esq., Harefield Hall, Wilmslow. It
was raised from Cattleya Bowringiana crossed with the pollen of Latia
Ingrami (L. Dayana * C. Dowiana), part of a plant obtained from Messrs-

NovEMBER, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 333

Hugh Low & Co. some twelve or fourteen years ago, and is said to
resemble the seed bearer in habit except that some of the bulbs have one
and some two leaves. It is a remarkably brilliant flower, with very broad
deep rose-purple segments, and some yellow on the disc of the well-
expanded lip. It has retained some of the C. Dowiana fragrance, but the
influence of Lzlia Dayana is hardly apparent.

A very fine form of Cypripedium Leeanum has been sent from the
collection of J. U. Hodgson, Esq., Bebington Hall, Birkenhead. The
dorsal sepal is 2? inches broad, white, with a green base and a few brown
dots, while two rows of purple dots extend to the apex. The petals and lip
are quite typical in character. It was raised in the collection.

PARTHENOGENESIS.
AT a meeting of the R.H.S. Orchid Committee held some months ago
Mr. John S. Moss, Wintershill, Bishops Waltham, “showed a flower of a
fourth generation of Zygopetalum Mackayi crossed with the pollen of

Odontoglossum crispum, which _ still reproduced the Zygopetalum
unmodified. A note on the same plant is given at page 111, and it is now
clear fhat hybrids need never be expected from such a cross. Messrs.
McBean, Cooksbridge, have also crossed Epidendrum radicans with the
pollen of Bletia Shepherdii, and raised about a hundréd seedlings, none of
whicb show a trace of the Bletia, and one has now flowered. It is
evidently another case of parthenogenesis, and the more curious because of
the well-known difficulty of getting capsules of the Epidendrum when
pollinated with other genera. This is probably due to some mechanical
difficulty, either in the relative size or length of the pollen tubes and the
micropyle of the ovules or in the relative times required by these diverse
species to reach maturity, and the ovules then continue to develop and
mature in the absence of fertilisation.

The term ‘‘ False hybrids” has been applied to such cases among
Orchids, and we are asked whether that of ‘‘ Parthenogensis” can be
strictly applied. We believe it can, for the term is applicable to any
sexual bud that matures and reproduces the organism without fertilisation.
Of course in this case there is something additional, for the ovules of
Orchids are only developed as the result of pollination, but the stimulus to
development can be set up by foreign pollen which is not capable of
subsequently effecting fertilisation, hence the ovules proceed no further,
except in the anomalous cases under discussion and others which have
been recorded. It is a case of the development of the ovules as the result
of the stimulus of pollination, and as the alien pollen tubes do not enter the
micropyle of the ovule there can be no transmission of paternal characters.
A note on the subject appears at pp- I41, 142 of our last volume,

334 THE ORCHID REVIEW. {[NovEMBER, 1913.

CCELOGYNE FUSCESCENS AND ITS ALLIES.
THERE is a group of green and, brown autumn-flowering Ccoelogynes whose’
history has been much confused, but a comparison of living flowers from
three different collections, and additional dried specimens, enables some of
the confusion to be cleared up.

CGLOGYNE FUSCESCENS is the earliest known member of the group. It
was described by Lindley, in 1830 (Gen. & Sp. Orch., p. 41), from dried
specimens collected in Nepal by Wallich. It was afterwards collected in
the Khasia Hills by Hooker and Thomson, and in Sikkim by Sir J. D.
Hooker. In Sikkim it is said to grow at 3000 to 5000 feet elevation, flowering
from October to December. It is figured by King & Pantling (Amn. R. Bot.
Gard. Calc., vill. p. 132, t. 182). It is not certain when it was first
introduced to cultivation, for although recorded as flowering at Sion House
in 1843 (Lindl. Bot. Reg., 1844, Misc. p. 1), the record clearly belongs to
the following. The earliest garden specimens we have seen date from
1882, though it may have been cultivated earlier.

CaLOGYNE BRUNNEA was described by Lindley in 1848 (Gard. Chron.,
1848, p. 71, with fig.), from a plant which is said to have flowered at Sion
House in the autumn of 1844, and afterwards in other collections. Its
origin was apparently not known. Six years later Lindley recorded it as C.
fuscescens var. brunnea (Fol. Orch., Ccelog, p. 11), giving the localities as
Khasia, 3000 ft., Hooker & Thomson ; Sikkim Himalaya, 4000 ft., J.D
Hooker. These, however, both belong to typical C. fuscescens, Lindl. In
1865 it was figured in the Botanical Magazine (t. 5494) under the latter
name, when its history was given by Mr. James Bateman. After alluding
to its original introduction, he remarks: “‘ It would seem to have been
almost immediately lost—at all events I am not aware that it has ever
blossomed a second time. This circumstance is the more remarkable since
the plant, which Messrs. Hugh Low & Co. have lately re-introduced, is
now found to grow freely and flower profusely under the most ordinary
treatment. It isa native of Moulmein, from whence it was sent by Mr.
Parish to Messrs. Low. It has already blossomed in several places, but
the finest specimens were produced in Mr. Day’s collection, and from these,
with his kind permission, the accompanying figure was prepared. The
species flowers in the winter months, and continues in beauty for several
weeks.” From a note by Mr. Day it appears that the plant was also
drawn by Mr. Durham, and this drawing is probably now in the fine
collection of Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart. A single flower was drawn by
Mr. Day, but this is said to have been from another plant, imported by
Messrs. Hugh Low & Co. from Moulmein. This species has recently been
collected near Chengmai, Siam, by Dr. Alexander Kerr, who found it on

NOVEMBER, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 335

trees in shady valleys at 4000 to 5000 feet elevation on Doi Sutep. We do
not know if it is in cultivation at the present time.

CCLOGYNE ASSAMICA was described in 1857 (Linden & Rchb. f. in Berl.
Allg. Gartenz., 1857, p. 403). It is said to have been received from Assam,
and to have flowered with Mr. John Linden in December, 1857. Soon
afterwards it was figured by Reichenbach (Xen. Orch., ii. p. 111, fig. 2). It
is most like C. brunnea in the strongly three-lobed lip, but has smaller
flowers, with lighter sepals and petals. There are specimens preserved at
Kew from several collections, and in two cases the plants are said to have
been imported from Burma. It is now flowering at the Royal Botanic
Garden, Glasnevin, in the collection of Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., and
with Messrs. Sander & Sons.

CG@LOGYNE CYCNOCHES was collected by the Rev. C. Parish on Dauna
Toung, Moulmein, at 4000 feet elevation, and was described from dried
specimens and a painting (Par. & Rchb. f. in Trans. Linn. Soc. xxx. p.
147). It was recorded as rare, and is still only known from Parish’s
original specimen and drawing. It has light green flowers, and a strongly
three-lobed lip, with acute lobes, and some radiating brown stripes on the
front lobe.

The foregoing were placed in a distinct section of the genus, called
Fuscescentes, by Pfitzer (Engl. Pflanzenr., Orch. Coelog., p. 42), but he only
admitted two species, C. fuscescens, with three varieties, and C. Cycnoches.
The arrangement does not accord with the characters of the plants, and
there is much confusion. Of the typical C. fuscescens he gives several
localities, of which Burma must be excluded, as belonging to var. brunnea,
while his figures A and B, given as representing the type, belong to his var.
assamica. The latter is based on C. assamica as originally described, with-
out any additional information. Under var. brunnea he includes the original
Moulmein plant and another from Yunnan, having rather smaller flowers.
Then comes a var. integrilabia, with fig. C, based on Lindley’s var. A.—
which is the original C. fuseescens, and the single locality, “ Penang
Wallich, 1962,’ which is erroneous. The fact is Wallich included two
plants under his 1962, one from Nepal, which is C. fuscescens, Lindl., and
another from Penang, the latter being C. macrobulbon, Hook. f., which is
identical with the older C. Rochussenii, De Vriese. Pfitzer’s fig. D.,
purporting to represent C. Cycnoches, was copied from a drawing on the
Kew sheet, but is incorrect, representing a plant with a broader lip, very
obtuse side lobes, and five keels on the disc. It isasad record of confusion.
The materials are hardly adequate at present to say whether C. brunnea
and C. assamica are distinct or forms of a single species, but C. fuscescens
is easily separated by its nearly obsolete side lobes, besides being

geographically distinct. R.A.R,

THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NovEMBER, 1913.

Ww
ww
i>)

A PIONEER ORCHID FIRM.
Messrs. JAMES VEITCH & Sons.
THE retirement of Sir Harry J. Veitch and the sale of the important
business of Messrs. James Veitch & Sons provides an opportune occasion
to review the history of the firm in its long and successful connection with
Orchidology, extending over a period of more than three-quarters of a century.

The initiation of the business was due to Mr. John Veitch, who, towards

Fig. 62. Sir Harry J. VEITCH.

the close of the eighteenth century, came from Jedburgh, Scotland, to enter
the service of Sir Thomas Acland, at Killerton, Devon, and some years later
commenced business there-as a nurseryman. He was succeeded by his son,
Mr. James Veitch, who in 1832 purchased additional land at Mount

ee eee =

NOVEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 337

Radford, Exeter, and thus founded the celebrated Exeter Nursery. It was
to the son of Mr. James Veitch, long known as James Veitch, junr., that
the development of the Orchid business was. due. The latter was born at
Exeter, in May, 1815, and when about eighteen years of age he was sent
for two years to London for the purpose of acquiring experience, and one of
these was passed in the Nursery of Messrs. Rollisson, of Tooting, a firm
famous in the past for its Orchid business. It was on his return to Exeter
from Tooting that young Veitch, taking with him a collection of the Orchid
genus of those days, commenced the culture of those favourite plants, a
taste which he always cultivated with the greatest possible zest, and which
came in time to be ministered to by the introductions of his own collectors,
and by his intimate personal friendship with men like Mr. G. Ure-Skinner
and Colonel Benson, who had .made acquaintance with Orchids in their
native homes.

The Orchids purchased from Messrs. Rollisson became the nucleus of the
collection for which Messrs. Veitch have for so long been renowned, but
Mr. Veitch soon began to import on his own account. In 1840 he sent
William Lobb, a promising young gardener who had been in his nursery,
to Brazil, where on landing he proceeded to the Organ Mountains, and met
with several beautiful and notable Orchids at that time extremely rare
in English gardens, a consignment of which, with other South Brazilian
Orchids, were transmitted to Exeter. Lobb afterwards went to Chili,
Peru, and elsewhere, successfully introducing many plants which are
outside our sphere, but the introduction of four notable Orchids has been
attributed to him, namely Cyenoches pentadactylon, Houlletia Brockle-
hurstiana, Oncidium curtum, and Cypripedium caudatum, the three former
from Brazil, the last from Peru.

About three years after William Lobb left for Brazil his brother,
Thomas Lobb, left for Singapore, afterwards proceeding to Java, where he
successfully introduced the beautiful Phalznopsis grandiflora, afterwards
found to be the original P. amabilis, Blume—and now often grown under
the later name of P. Rimestadiana. Afterwards he went to the Khasia
Hills, Assam, and other parts of North-east India, Moulmein, Lower
Burma, North Borneo, and the Philippine Islands, introducing a remark-
able series of Orchids and other plants, and also collecting a large number
of dried specimens, now preserved at Kew and elsewhere. Among his
successful introductions we may mention Vanda ccerulea, tricolor and
suavis, Dendrobium tortile, cretaceum, albosanguineum, and D.
macrophyllum var. Veitchianum, Cypripedium villosum and javanicum,
Coelogyne speciosa, Schilleriana, and lentiginosa, Pleione maculata,
lagenaria, and humilis, Aérides Fieldingii and A. multiflorum var Lobbii,
Arachnanthe Lowii, Bulbophyllum Lobbii, Calanthe rosea, Cymbidium

338 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (NOVEMBER, 1913.

giganteum, Phalznopsis amabilis, rosea, and intermedia, Saccolabium
miniatum, Spathoglottis aurea, and Stauropsis gigantea. To these must be
added consignments of many previously known species. Much of the
territory visited by Lobb was virgin soil, and few collectors have enriched
European gardens with such a multitude of beautiful Indo-Malayan Orchids.

It was in April, 1853, that Mr. James Veitch moved to London, when
he acquired the old-established Exotic Nursery of Messrs. Knight & Perry,
in the King’s Road, Chelsea, which was ‘then remodelled and improved.
Twelve years later he took his two sons, John Gould Veitch and Harry J.
Veitch, into partnership, thus establishing the business of Messrs James
Veitch & Sons. |

Just before leaving Exeter, experiments were commenced which have
had far-reaching results. It was about the year 1853 that Mr. John
Dominy, one of Mr. Veitch’s foremen, acting on the advice of Mr. John
Harris, a surgeon of Exeter, began to make experiments in hybridising
Orchids, beginning, it is said, with the genus Cattleya. It was, however, a
Calanthe that first reached the flowering stage, in October, 1856, and
opened a new chapter in the annals of Orchidology. A flower was
immediately taken to Dr. Lindley, who is said to have exclaimed at the
sight, ‘‘ Why, you will drive the botanists mad.” He himself seems to
have received a shock, forit was not till nearly fifteen months later that he
recorded the event. Writing in January, 1858, he remarked: ‘‘ On. the
25th October 1856, Mr. James Veitch, junr., of the Ff xotic Nursery, Chelsea,
brought to the writer of this memorandum a flower of a Calanthe which
combined ‘the peculiar hairy forked spur and deeply lobed lip of the white
Calanthe furcata with the violet colour and broad middle lobe of the lip of
C. Masuca. One might have said that the flowers were just intermediate
between the two. . . .. It appears that it had been raised in. the
Exotic Nursery by Mr. Dominy, Messrs. Veitch’s indefatigable and very
intelligent foreman, between C. Masuca and C. furcata. The seed was
obtained in 1854 by crossing these two species, was.immediately sown, and
in two years the seedlings were in flower. . .. . We, therefore, propose,
with much pleasure, that the name of the hybrid be Calanthe Dominii, in
order to put upon record the name of the first man who succeeded
in the operation. He is indeed specially entitled to the distinction, not
only in consequence of having produced other Orchidaceous mules, among
which we understand are Cattleyas, but because of his eminent success in
raising such plants from seed as a matter of horticultural business.”

This marked the commencement of a new industry, and in order to
show how completely it was initiated. by Messrs. Veitch it may be
mentioned that it was not until fifteen years later—when about sixteen
distinct hybrids, belonging to various genera, had been recorded—that a

NOVEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 339

hybrid flowered in another collection. We cannot follow the development
further here, but may add that the history of the question was given in
detail in our first volume.

The business of importing Orchids continued, and in addition to various
striking things sent to Messrs. Veitch through travellers and residents

Fig. 63. CALANTHE Domrnyi (the first hybrid Orchid).

rd , cA 7 }
abroad—prominent among them being Colonel Benson, who sent several
fine things from Moulmein—they employed a number of travellers, several
of whom paid special attention to Orchids, to whom we may now briefly

allude,

340 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NovEMBER, 1913.

Richard Pearce was sent to Chili, Peru, and Bolivia, where he collected
very successfully between 1859 and 1866, and although his work was not
much among Orchids the introduction of Cypripedium caricinum and
Epidendrum syringothyrsus are attributed to him.

John Gould Veitch went to Japan in 1860, proceeding thence to the
Philippine Islands, whence he sent a number of Phaleenopsis, then rare in
British gardens, and finally visiting the South Sea Islands. His
introductions include Dendrobium Johannis, Gouldii, and canaliculatum,
Cypripedium philippinense, and Cymbidium canaliculatum.

Henry Hutton was sent on a collecting mission to the East in 1866,
and spent some time in Java, thence proceeding to other parts of the
Malay Archipelago. His introductions include the remarkable Cymbidium
Huttonii, Saccolabium Huttonii, Dendrobium superbum var. Huttonii,
and th: rare Vanda. insignis.

Carl Kramer was sent to Japan in 1867, and afterwards went to Costa
Rica and Guatemala for Orchids, but the introduction of Odontoglossum
Krameri, named after him, seems to have been almost his only success.

Gottlieb Zahn went to Central America in 1869, seuding home several

consignments of Orchids from the neighbourhood of Chiriqui, from which
Epidendrum physodes and Masdevallia lata were described. He was
proceeding to Costa Rica when he perished by drowning.
_ J. H. Chesterton was a very successful collector for the firm between
1870 and 1878. Originally a valet for a gentleman who travelled much in
foreign lands, Chesterton wished to bring home some of the floral
treasures which he met with, and applied to Messrs. Veitch as to the best
means of packing them. Information was readily afforded, and
opportunities given of seeing plants packed for long journeys, as well as
those recently imported. Nothing more was heard of Chesterton for some
time, but on returning from a visit to South America he came to Chelsea
with a collection of Orchids so carefu'ly packed and cared for that they
arrived in the best possible condition. Messrs. Veitch accepted the offer of
purchase, and subsequently Chesterton entered the service of the firm as
traveller, the special object being the introduction of the much talked-of
scarlet Odontogiossum (O. vexillarium), whose existence had been made
known by Bowman, an earlier traveller of the firm, and afterwards by Wallis
and Roezl, who had made unsuccessful attempts at its introduction.
Chesterton started with but the scantiest information, but he succeeded in
discovering the plant, and safely introduced it to Chelsea, where it flowered
for the first time in 1873. Chesterton alse sent home the fine Masdevallia
coccinea Harryana, M. simula, some fine forms and hybrids of Odonto-
glossum crispum, and other Orchids.

George Downton was sent to Central America in 1871 for Orchids, and

NoveMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 341

forwarded consignments to Chelsea, after which he joined Endres in Costa
Rica, in search of the long-desired Odontoglossum Warscewiczii (afterwards
called Miltonia Endresii), which was successful, for he brought a few living
plants to England with various other Orchids, though the majority perished
en route.

A. R. Endres was a half-caste who had been employed, through Mr. G,
Ure-Skinner, to collect Orchids in Guatemala for Mr. James Bateman.
The latter afterwards recommended him to Messrs. Veitch, for whom he
collected in Costa Rica from 1871 to 1873, part of the time in company
with Downton. His introductions include Miltonia Endresii, Crypto-
phoranthus gracilentus, Polycinis gratiosa, Epidendrum Endresii,
Masdevallia Reichenbachiana and _triaristella, and Cattleya Skinneri
alba. He also sent home a batch of the beautiful yellow C. Dowiana,
then extremely rare.

Gustave Wallis, formerly a collector for Mr. J. Linden of Brussels,
entered Messrs. Veitch’s service in 1870, and was sent to the Philippines,
principally to collect Phalznopsis, and during the expedition discovered the
two striking Cypripediums, Argus and Haynaldianum, also Dendrobium
amethystoglossum. Two years later he went to New Grenada, where he
discovered the very distinct Epidendrum Wallisii, Masdevallia peristeria
and gargantua, Odontoglossum prznitens, Oncidium anthocrene, Pescatorea
Dayana and lamellosa, Cypripedium caudatum Wallisii, and various other
interesting things.

Walter Davis was sent to South America with the special object of
securing a quantity of the brilliant Masdevallia Veitchiana, then extremely
Scarce, in which he was successful, besides discovering other striking
Orchids; M. Davisii, Barlzana, and ionocharis, Cypripedium Boissierianum,
Lycaste Locusta, and others. It is said that during his four years’ stay in
South America Davis crossed the Cordillera of the Andes no fewer than
twenty times, at elevations of 14000 to 17000 feet, and traversed that vast
Continent from one side to the other, along the whole length of the Amazon
valley.

Mr. Peter C. M. Veitch made a long sea voyage in the interests of the
firm, leaving in 1875 for Australia, whence he proceeded to the Fiji and
South Sea Islands, New Zealand, and New Guinea, finally joining F. W.
Burbidge in a collecting expedition to Borneo, and returning to Chelsea in
1878. Although twice he had the misfortune to lose his collections by
shipwreck, he sent a number of interesting things home, among the Orchids
attributed to him being Dendrobium arachnostachyum, Petri, and
tipuliferum, and Spathoglottis Petri.

Guillerme Kalbreyer made a short trip. to West Africa in 1876, during
which he discovered Pachyvstoma Thomsonianus and_ Brachycorythis

342 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NovEMBER, 1913.

Kalbreyeri, the former—now known as Ancistrochilus—being sent home
alive. He then made several journeys to Colombia, sending home fine
consignments of Odontoglossums, Masdevallias, Miltonia vexillaria, and
many other Orchids. His engagement terminated in 1881.

F. W. Burbidge collected in Borneo and the Sulu Archipelago in 1877
and 1878, during which time he made the ascent of Mt. Kina Balu. His
discoveries include Phalenopsis Marie, Cypripedium Lawrenceanum,
Dendrobium Burbidgei, Bulbophyllum mandibulare and B. Leysenianum.
The impressions of his journey are’ recorded in an interesting volume,
entitled The Gardens of the Sun.

Charles H. Curtis collected for the firm from 1878 to 1884, his first trip
being to Mauritius and Madagascar, during which he discovered Angraecum
hyaloides in the latter island. After that he explored Borneo, Sumatra,
Java, and the Moluccas. His discoveries include Cypripedium Curtisii
and tonsum, Coelogyne Dayana, Dendrobium Antelope and leucolophotum,
Eria Curtisii, Phalenopsis maculata, Calanthe Curtisii, and other interesting
things.

David Burke collected for the firm from 1881 to 1897, and is said to
have covered a greater portion of the earth’s service in search of plants
than any other Veitchian collector, with the possible exception of the two
brothers Lobb. He first went to Borneo with Curtis, then to British
Guiana—where he discovered Zygopetalum Burkei and_ introduced
Cypripedium Lindleyanum—twice to the Philippines for Phalznopsis,
twice to New Guinea, once to Burma, three times to Colombia, and lastly
to the Moluccas, where he died in 1897. His introductions include
Coelogyne Veitchii, Cirrhopetalum robustum, and Phaius_ philippinensis.

From these collectors importations of various well-known Orchids were
constantly being received, also numerous other plants which are outside
our scope. For the same reason we have omitted several collectors whose
work scarcely touched Orchids, and among them the last very successful
traveller, Mr. E. H. Wilson, who, however, introduced Cypripedium
tibeticum and the pretty little Dendrobium bellatulum among his extensive
introductions from China.

The important work of hybridising Orchids initiated by Messrs Veitch,
which has so completely altered the character of our collections, has already
been mentioned, and after the retirement of Mr. Dominy, in 1880, the work
was greatly extended by Mr. John Seden during the next fifteen years.
Seden raised an enormous number of hybrids, commencing with
Cypripedium Sedenii in 1873, the most important genera including
Cypripedium, Lzliocattleya, Cattleya, Dendrobium, Lelia, Epidendrum,
Phalznopsis, Masdevallia, Calanthe, Disa, Zygopetalum, Chysis, Sophro-
cattleya, Phaiocalanthe, and various miscellaneous subjects. In 1889 the

November, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 343

seedling Orchids were removed to Langley, near Slough, and six years
later Seden retired, being succeeded by Mr. T. A. Briscoe, who had for
some time been in charge of the Kew collection, and who has since carried
on the work with much success. Some handsome hybrids have already
flowered, but a large number of choice crosses have not yet reached the
flowering stage.

Another important service rendered to Orchidology by Messrs. Veitch
was the production of their Manual of Orchidaceous Plants, which was issued
in ten parts between 1894 and 1897, and which still remains the standard
work on Garden Orchids. It forms two volumes of large octavo size.
Lastly, we may mention the Hortus Veitchit, by James H. Veitch, a
handsome quarto volume, which appeared in 1906, in which the history and
work of the firm in its various departments is recorded, and to which we
acknowledge our indebtedness for some of the facts mentioned in this
article. We regret the loss of an old historic firm, but have the satisfaction
of knowing that the Orchid Department at Langley has fallen into worthy
hands. We look with confidence to Messrs. Flory and Black to uphold the
traditions of the Veitchian firm in the future. And we hope that Sir Harry
and Lady Veitch may long be spared to enjoy their well-earned retirement.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION,
By C. ALWYN HARRISON, F.R.H.S.

THIs month is rather a trying one for the successful cultivation of Orchids,
as, owing to the vagaries of the weather, it is often a matter of extreme
difficulty to maintain even temperatures and avoid fluctuations, which are
so bad for these plants. But by care and intelligent stoking much can be
accomplished, and an average day temperature of 53° to 60° Fahr., with a
drop to 50° at night, should be maintained as far as possible. Continue to
admit air on all favourable occasions, and if the sun shines brightly at noon
and there is sufficient heat in the pipes, the top and bottom ventilators can
usually be opened, but generally air can only be given through the latter.

From now to the beginning of March much caution is needed in the
watering of the plants. An overdose will often result in the loss of an
Orchid, especially if the weather is dull and evaporation slow... Therefore,
on. looking over the plants, it will be found a good plan to leave until the
following day any plant which does not actually require water, for much
less harm is done by a day’s drying than by sas the plant’s roots to be
growing in a sodden mass of compost.

The winter-flowering Cypripediums, such as aureum, Actzus, Boxallii,
Calypso, Elsie, Hera, Hitchinsiz, insigne and its many varieties, Leeanum,
nitens, Rossetti, Sallieri, triumphans, and villosum will now be throwing
up their flowers, and the plants should be carefully looked over, all dead

344 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NovEMBER, 1913.

leaves removed, flowers neatly staked, and leaves sponged. If thus gone
over carefully, their beautiful and long-lasting blossoms are set off to great
advantage. Besides the varieties mentioned there are countless secondary
hybrids, all of which are worthy and suitable for cultivation in an amateur’s
house, and I think the best plan is to visit a nursery and select individual
plants in bloom.

The beautiful Oncidium tigrinum, which, to my mind, is one of the
handsomest of any Orchid yet in cultivation, will now be throwing up its
flower spikes, and must be placed in the warmest and lightest part of the
house, as otherwise the buds are apt to turn yellow and drop off. If not
very strong it will be found best to remove the spike as soon as all the
flowers are open, as otherwise too great a strain will be imposed upon
weakly plants, and much care would be required to grow them again into
strong, healthy specimens. The flowers, however, will keep as long in a
cut state as if left on the plant, providing the stem be cut under water every
day, and a little salt added to the water, which should be changed daily.
The above remarks apply to all the species of winter and spring-flowering
Oncidiums.

. Where there is the necessary time it will be found a good plan to
periodically go through the whole collection, sponging the leaves, removing
any useless pseudobulbs, and in keeping a sharp look-out for all signs of
insect life. Slugs are unusually troublesome at this season, and therefore
must be carefully watched for. Bran or fresh lettuce leaves laid at intervals
on the staging form attractive baits, and many can be caught if a search is
made with a lantern about eight o’clock in the evening.

It is now too late in the year to re-pot any plant, as the winter is near
at hand, and no Orchid ever re-establishes itself satisfactorily at that season.
Potting should only be done when the roots are active and thus able to
avail themselves of the new compost at once.

SUGGESTED ADDITION.

CYPRIPEDIUM LEEANUM.—This hybrid is most suitable for an Amateur’s
Cool house, being free-flowering, of easy culture, and low in price. The
blooms are produced in the winter months, and will keep fresh from eight
to ten weeks if kept cool and dry. Several fine varieties exist, but in the
typical form the dorsalsepal is white, with violet dots and a green base,
the sepals and pouch being yellow, much over-laid by brownish red. No
other hybrid has probably been so much employed by the hybridist, and the
secondary hybrids of C. Leeanum are extremely handsome and comprise
such useful winter-flowering varieties as Actzus, Leander, Lasellei, and
Tracyanum. In fact over forty distinct hybrids from C. Leeanum are
recorded in the Orchid Stud-Book, and others have appeared pine, so that
there is ample material to select from.

ee

NovEeMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW.

345
CYPRIPEDIUM BOLTONI! WITH A THREE-FLOWERED
SCAPE.

THE annexed figure represents the plant of Cypripedium Boltonii bearing
a three-flowered scape, from the collection of W. P. Burkinshaw, Esq., The

West Hill, Hessle, which gained a First-class Diploma at the meeting of

Fig, 64. CYPRIPEDIUM BOLTONII WITH THREE-FLOWERED SCAPE.

the North ot Enecland Horticultural Society, held at Leeds on October jTD
and roth last. It is reproduced from a photograph kindly sent by Mr. J. T.
Barker, who remarks that he has never seen a Cypripedium of this secti

: J ] ee : ] | leece t > ~“ 1] £ 4 ~11]
with a three-Howered scape before. It is doubtless the result of good culture

346 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (NOVEMBER, 1913.

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HORTICULTURAL.
A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
‘West ter, on October 7th, when there was a larger display of Orchids
than has been seen for the last two months, and Cattleyas and Lelio-
cattleyas were particularly well represented. The awards consisted of five
medals, one First-class Certificate, and three Awards of Merit.

Orchid Committee present : J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair), and
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), W. Bolton, Gurney Wilson, R. B. White,
S. W. Flory, W. H. White, A. Dye, J. E. Shill, W. H. Hatcher, J.
Charlesworth, W. Cobb, C. H. Curtis, A. McBean, T. Armstrong, R. G.
Thwaites, Stuart Low, F. J. Hanbury, F. Sander, R. A. Rolfe, and Sir
Harry J. Veitch.

W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield, Edgbaston (gr. Mr. Jones), sent
Cattleya Dietrichiana Southfield var., a richly-coloured form, and a
beautiful example of C. Hardyana alba, with a spike of four flowers, having
white sepals and petals, and a rich crimson lip with yellow throat and
veining.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, showed a beautiful
example of Odontoglossum Smithii, a good blotched O. crispum, and others.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), sent the
beautiful albino Lelia pumila alba, and the handsome Cattleya Rhoda
illuminata, Sophrolzlia Gratrixie, with a good example of Odontoglossum
Ceres.

Sir John Edwards Moss, Bart., Roby Hall, Torquay, sent a flower of
a hybrid Cymbidium, obtained from C. giganteum x erythrostylum, and
showing clearly its origin. The ground colour was green, lined with red-
brown on the sepals, petals and lip, with the column red, as in the pollen
parent. It hes been named Cymbidium Florinda.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent Leelio-
cattleya Maqueda (L.-c. George Woodhams x C. Rothschildiana), a large
and handsome hybrid, with rose-purple sepals and petals and a deep
ruby-crimson lip, and Odontonia brugensis var. Distinction, bearing a
raceme of eight flowers, having pale lilac segments with a violet base, and
some yeéffow on the disc of the lip.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham Hill, sent a pretty little
group, including good forms of Cattleya Fabia, Iris, Adula, Cleopatra,
Dowiana aurea, and others.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a very fine group,
including a beautiful series of Oncidium incurvam and Epidendrum
vitellinum autumnale at the back, some finely-grown and well-flowered

NOVEMBER, 1913-] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 347

specimens of Cypripedium Charlesworthii, C. glaucophyllum x
Fairrieanum, C. Rolfei, leyburnense, Niobe, and other good hybrids, the
fine yellow Phaius Ashworthianus, Pescatorea Roezlii, Angraecum
Buyssonii, Warrea bidentata, Warscewiczella discolor, Dendrobium
Dearei, Miltonia Bleuana nobilior, Phaius' Norman, good examples of
Oncidioda cinnabarina and Charlesworthii, Lycaste hybrida, Cattleya
Mantinii, Lzliocattleya Colmanii, Neleus, Dominiana, St.-Gothard, Pelias,
and others, Odontioda Brewii (O. Charlesworthii x Odontoglossum
Harryanum), the new O. Brunette (O. Bohnhofiz x Odontoglossum
Harryanum), almost black-purple in colour, Brassocatlelia Cooksonii
(B.-]. Gratrixie xX Cattleya Dowiana aurea), a very pretty red and yellow
hybrid, Sophrocatlelia Sibyl, Brassocattleya Maronie and Marie; &c., with
a beautiful series of Odontoglossums (Silver-gilt Flora Medal),

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group,
including some good examples of Cattleya Fabia, Iris, Armstrongiz, Adula,
fulvescens, Rothschildiana, and Dowiana aurea, Leeliocattleya Sand-
hurstiana (L.-c. Norba X C. Dowiana aurea), the handsome L.-c. Mrs.
Donald MacMaster Orchidhurst var. (L.-c. luminosa X C. Dowiana aurea),
L.-c. Thyone, George Woodhams, Greenwoodii, and Norba, Ccelogyne
pandurata, Phalenopsis amabilis, Brassocattleya Maronia, and a good
example of the remarkable Bulbophyllum Ericssonii (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a handsome group, including
a fine series of Cattleya Fabia, C. Iris, C. Rothschildiana, C. Mrs. J. W.
Whiteley, C. Mrs. Pitt var. Golden Dawn, with’ blush white flowers and
much yellow on the very undulate lip, Saccolabium acutifolium and
dasypogon, Oncidium bicallosum aureum, Ccelogyne assamica, Catasetum
macrocarpum, Odontioda Charlesworthii and Bradshawize, Cypripedium
triumphans, C. Niobe-Leeanum, C. Richmanii, some good Odontoglossums,
Leliocattleya Phoenix, and many other good things (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a very pretty group, including
‘some good Odontoglossum grande, Cattleya Dowiana aurea, C. Harrisoniana
alba, C. Iris, Nestor, Hassallii, iridescens, labiata, and Mantinii, Lelio-
cattleya Hera (L.-c. Issy X C. Hardyana), Cirrhopetalum appendiculatum,
and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Bush Hill Park, staged a very effective
group, including a good series of Oncidium varicosum, Dendrobium
Phalznopsis and superbiens, Vanda ccerulea, Odontoglossum grande,
Cattleya Thurgoodiana, Hardyana, and Iris, Brassocattleya Maronie and
B.-c. Pocahontas alba, the pretty lavender-tinted Lzlia Dayana delicata,
and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Flory & Black, Orchid Nursery, Slough, staged ‘a small group
of good things, including. Brassocatlelia Morna superba, B.-c.-l. Eric

348 THE ORCHID REVIEW. | NovEMBER, 1913.

(B.-c. Maroniz X L.-c. Violetta), a very large and promising hybrid, of a
rosy lilac shade, Brassocattleya Ilene (B.-c. Maronie X C. Dowiana aurea),
rosy pink with a fine yellow disc, Cattleya Atalanta, C. Mendelii x
Percivaliana, and others.

Mr. E. V. Low, Vale Bridge, Haywards Heath, sent Cattleya Iris
Prince Arthur, a very distinct form, with bronzy red sepals and petals and
a deep rose-purple lip.

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, sent a small choice group,
including Cattleya Rothschildiana albescens McBean’s var., a charming
blush white form with a yellow disc to the lip, Odontioda Minerva
(Odontoglossum Edwardii X Odontioda Bohnhofie), with a branching
spike of deep red flowers, O. Euterpe, Diana, and Lambeauiana, Vanda
Sanderiana, Odontoglossum amabile, and others.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

CATTLEYA ADULA GLEBE vaR. (bicolor X Hardyana).—A very fine
variety, with broad, rich bronzy yellow sepals and petals, and an ample
deep crimson lip. Exhibited by C. J. Phillips, Esq., The Glebe, Sevenoaks.

AWARDS OF - MERIT.

BRASSOCATTLEYA IRIs (C. Iris x B.-c. Thorntonii).—A charming
hybrid, having bright rose flowers, becoming paler at the base of the
segments, and the disc of the lip light yellow. Exhibited by Messrs. J. &
A. McBean.

CATTLEYA FaBia PRINCE OF WALES (labiata x Dowiana aurea).—A
very large and handsome form, having bright magenta-rose sepals and
petals, with the front lobe of the lip crimson. Exhibited by Messrs. Sander
& Sons.

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRAWSHAYANUM SUPERBUM (Hallii x Harryanum).—
A beautiful form, bearing a spike of ten fine flowers, with the sepals and
petals green, heavily blotched with brown, and the lip white, with some
purple spotting round the yellow crest. Exhibited by Pantia Ralli, Esq.

At the meeting held on October 21st there was a fine display of Orchids,
and the awards consisted of seven medals, six Awards of Merit, and one
Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), Gurney Wilson, W. Bolton, S. W. Flory,
W. H. White, A. Dye, H. G. Alexander, J. E. Shill, W. P. Bound,
G. Hunter, W. H. Hatcher, J. Cypher, J. Charlesworth, W. Cobb, C. H.
Curtis, A. McBean, T. Armstrong, F. J. Hanbury, F. M. Ogilvie, J. Wilson
Potter, R. G. Thwaites, R. A. Rolfe, C. J. Lucas, Sir Jeremiah Colman,
Bart., and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr-

t
|

NOVEMBER, 1912.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 349

Alexander), received a Silver Banksian Medal for a small group of choice
things, in finely-grown examples, including Cattleya Fabia Holford’s var.,
bearing a spike of five remarkably large and richly-coloured flowers, a
beautiful example of C. Rothschildiana, Leeliocattleya Neleus (C. Iris x
L.-c. Ophir), a delicately tinted flower, L.-c. luminosa Canary Bird,
Brassocattleya Leemanniz, Cypripedium Actzeus Bianca, Boltonii, Muriel,
and others.

W. R. Lee, Esq., Plumpton Hall, Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), received
a Silver Banksian Medal for a group of choice Cypripediums, including
€. Rossetti, Boltonii, Thalia Mr. F. Wellesley, Dreadnought, Pallas
Athene, and others, with a fine example of Lezliocattleya St.-Gothard in
the centre.

Mrs. Bischoffsheim, The Warren House, Stanmore (gr. Mr. Jones), sent
Cattleya labiata Warren House var., bearing a spike of four large rose-
coloured flowers with a darker lip.

William Bolton, Esq., Warrington. showed Cattleya Surprise (Triana
X granulosa), a promising hybrid with a strongly three-lobed lip.

H. S. Goodson, Esq., Fairlawn, Putney (gr. Mr. Day), staged a small
group, including Sophrocattleya Rappartiana and eximia, Sophrocatleelia
Niobe, Sophroleelia Irene, Cattleya Maggie Raphael Goodson’s var., &c.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. W. H. White),
showed Cattleya formosa albescens (Trianz alba X Hardyana alba), a pretty
light-coloured form.

His Grace the Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace, Woodstock (gr.
Mr. Hunter), sent Cypripedium Norah (Fairrieanum X Standard), a pretty
hybrid bearing three flowers, having a light-coloured dorsal sepal veined
with purple.

C. J. Phillips, Esq., The Glebe, Sevenoaks, sent Leliocattleya Astorie
Glebe var., a good white form, with the lip rosy crimson in front of the
yellow disc.

H. T. Pitt, Esq., Rosslyn, Stamford Hill (gr. Mr. Thurgood), sent two
good plants of the beautiful yellow Odontoglossum grande Pittianum, the
best bearing two racemes, also Cattleya Thela (Mrs. W. J. Whiteley x
Hardyana), and Lzliocattleya Amecia (L.-c. Wellsiana X C. Mantinii).

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham, sent Odontoglossum
Meredithize (Rossii rubescens..x.venustulum), a very pretty rose-tinted
hybrid, with dark spots, and a ruby red ‘blotch in front of thé lip’s crest,
also good examples of Odontioda Bradshawiz, Leeana, Cupid, and others.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent
Cattleya labiata Empress, a pretty white form with a pink tinge in front of
the lip, and Leliocattleya Captain Starkie Westfield var. (L.-c. Aphrodite
x C. labiata), having a broad rosy lip with darker lines.

350 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ NovEMBER, 1913-

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group,
including several good forms of Leliocattleya Thyone, L.-c. Cappei x C.
Dowiana aurea, Cattleya Acis (Mantinii X Dowiana aurea), C. Armstrongiz
x Dowiana aurea, with bronzy yellow flowers, Cattleya Fabia, Mantinii,
and Armstrongiz, C. Freya Mrs. Frederick Sassoon, a very fine purple
flower with yellow veining on the lip, C. Dusseldorfii, Odontioda Cupid, a
pretty purple hybrid between Odontoglossum Edwardii and illustrissimum,
Cypripedium Baron Schréder, Gaston Bultel, and others, Bulbophyllum
grandiflorum, Cirrhopetalum Fascinator, &c. (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged an attractive group,
including fine examples of Cattleya labiata, Fabia, Mantinii, and a very
dark C. Bowringiana, some good forms of Dendrobium Phalzenopsis, Phaius
Ashworthianus, Masdevallia angulata and calura, Miltonia candida, and
several good Cypripediums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, staged a pretty group of Cattleyas,
including C. labiata, Fabia, Hardyana, Dowiana aurea, Hassallii, Minucia,
Rothschildiana, St.-Gilles, and C. Moira (Fabia x Mantinii), a pretty
hybrid most like the former (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a small choice
group, including Leeliocattleya Saturn (L.-c. Clive x C. Dowiana Rosita), a
pretty lilac-purple flower with dark maroon-purple lip, Cattleya suavior’
C. Fabia and var. alba, Odontoglossum Dora, Trichopilia fragrans,
Listrostachys Chailluana, Oncidium Forbesii, and a plant of Polycycnis
muscifera with a very fine spike.

Messrs. Flory & Black, Langley, Slough, sent Cattleya labiata,
C. Rothschildiana, and Cypripedium Idina.

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Enfield, staged a pretty group, including
some good Oncidium varicosum, Dendrobium Phalznopsis and var. alba,
Vanda ceerulea, Cattleya Gaskelliana alba, Fabia, labiata, Mantinii, Leelio-
cattleya luminosa, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged a good group, including
many fine Cattleyas, Pleione lagenaria, Sarcopodium Ceelogyne, Sievkingia
peruviana, Ccelogyne fuliginosa, Odontioda Devosiana, Catasetum
macrocarpum, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA EMPRESS FREDERICK VAR. AVIA CLIFTON (Mossiz var.
Dowiana aurea).—A beautiful form, having large flowers, with white sepals
and petals, and a broad yellow lip striped with red. Exhibited by Pantia
Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes).

CATTLEYA GRANIRIS (granulosa X Iris).—A showy hybrid ot good shape,
having bronzy-orange sepals and petals, and a carmine-red lip. Exhibited
by C. J. Philips, Esq., Sevenoaks.

NoveMBER, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 351

CyPRIPEDIUM QUEEN ALEXANDRA (Lathamianum xX Charlesworthii).—
A fine hybrid, having a white dorsal sepal with dark purple base, the lip and
petals tinged with purple on a greenish yellow ground, and the staminode
white with a green centre. Exhibited by W. R. Lee, Esq.

ODONTOGLossUM VIVIEN (parentage unrecorded).—A beautiful hybrid
of the eximium type, having very round white flowers, and the broad
segments having a few red-purple blotches about the centre. Exhibited by
Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford.

ONCIDIUM VARICOSUM WESTONBIRT VAR.—A very large and handsome
form, with a remarkably broad lip. The plant bore two fine panicles of
bloom. Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford.

SOPHROCATLALIA Laconia (L.-c. callistoglossa x S.-l. heatonensis).—
A large and showy hybrid, having purple-rose flowers, with darker markings
on the lip. Exhibited by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION

CYPRIPEDIUM PICTURATUM.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., Burford, for a very fine specimen, bearing

about twenty-five scapes, and many of them twin-flowered.

MANCHESTER & NORTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

At the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on September
25th, the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme (in
the Chair), Messrs. J. Bamber, J. Cypher, A. G. Ellwood, J, Evans, D.
McLeod, W. Shackleton, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward, G. Weatherby, and H.
Arthur (Secretary).

Large Silver Medals were awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch
(gr. Mr. Gilden); A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish) ;
Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, and Messrs. J. Charlesworth
& Co., Haywards Heath, for fine varied groups, in which Cattleyas,
Lzliocattleyas and Odontoglossums were particularly well represented.

A Silver Medal was awarded to Wm. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange
(gr. Mr. Howes), for a good group of Cypripediums in variety. Silver
Medals were also awarded to Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, and
Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, for small choice groups.

A Special Vote of Thanks was awarded to O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury
(gr. Mr. Rogers), for a fine exhibit, including twenty plants of Cypripedium
Maudie and thirteen of Epidendrum vitellinum autumnale, a Cultural
Certificate and Bronze Medal being awarded to the gardener for the
excellent cultivation of the latter.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Cattleya Rhoda var. Queen Alexandra, one of the best of the type.

From R. Ashworth, Esq.

352 THE ORCHID REVIEW. |NoVEMBER, 1913

Coelogyne Mooreana, a pretty white flower, with yellow throat. From
Messrs. Sander & Sons.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

Sophrocattleya Blackii, Odontoglossum crispum xanthotes Ashlands
var., O. eximium xanthotes Ashlands var., and O. crispum Tetrarch. From
R. Ashworth, Esq.

With the report summarised above the Secretary encloses a list of
‘Cypripediums that have been deleted from the list, as not being worthy of
Confirmed Awards for points to count in the Competitions. The list
contains 168 names.

At the meeting held on October 16th, the members of Committee
present were :—Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth,
J. Bamber, J. Cypher, A. G. Ellwood, J. Evans, H. Hanmer, D. McLeod,
C. Parker, W. Shackleton, Z. A. Ward, G. Weatherby, A. Warburton,
and H. Arthur (Secretary).

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden), for a very fine miscellaneous group, in which Cattleyas and

* Cypripediums were particularly well represented.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
(gr. Mr. Dalgleish), and Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr. Weatherby),
for fine groups of Cattleyas, Cypripediums, and Odontoglossums, in well-
grown examples.

Silver Medals were awarded to-W. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange
(gr. Mr. Howes), for a small group of Cypripediums in variety ; and to
Messrs. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham; Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans,
and Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, for good mixed groups.

Interesting exhibits were staged by O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr.
Rogers), whose exhibit included a dozen good plants of Cypripedium
Fairrieanum and other good things; Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-
Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall); Mr: W. Shackleton, Great Horton, Bradford,

and Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath.
First-class CERTIFICATE.

Leeliocattleya excelsis (L.-c. Haroldiana x C. Hardyana), of good form
and colour, with a deep maroon lip; and Cattleya Purity (labiata Harefield
Hall x Warneri alba), a large flower, with white segments. From R.
Ashworth, Esq.

Cypripedium Troilus var. Impregnable (insigne Harefield Hall xX
nitens), a large well-set flower. From Wm. Thompson, Esq.

AWARDS OF MERIT.
Leliocattleya Colmaniz (L.-c. callistoglossa X C. Hardyana), and the

b
i
ir
i
§

NovEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 353

fine Odontoglossum grande superbum, from R. Ashworth, Esq., the latter
having been in Mr. Ashworth’s collection for sixteen years.

Cypripedium Arthurianum Walton Grange var. From Wm. Thompson,
Esq., Walton Grange, Stone.

NoRTH OF ENGLAND HORTICULTURAL.

At a show of the above Society held in the Corn Exchange, Leeds, on
October gth and roth, there was an interesting display of Orchids. The
largest exhibit was from Messrs. Mansell and Hatcher, Rawdon, their
group including a series of seasonable Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas, Miltonias,
Odontoglossums, Odontiodas, and Cypripediums, besides a number of
botanical curiosities. They received an award of a Silver-gilt Medal for
their group, and a Second-class Diploma for Lelia pumila alba.

W. P. Burkinshaw, Esq., The West Hill, Hessle (gr. Mr. J. T. Barker)»
also put upa group of fifteen plants, all of which were of merit. They
included Cattleya Rhoda conspicua, which was awarded a First-class
Diploma, Cypripidium Boltonii magnificum, with three fine flowers on one
spike, which gaineda First-class Diploma (see page 345), Cypripedium Lord
Ossulston with twelve flowers of fine size, this receiving a Cultural
Commendation. Cattleya Queen Mary, a pure white Cattleya, received a
Second-class Diploma. The other plants comprised such things as
Cypripedium Our Queen, C. Germaine Opoix, C. Maudie magnificum,
Cattleya iridescens, a fine yellow variety, Leeliocattleya callistoglossa
excelsa, L.-c. Walter Gott, and other good things. A large Silver Medal
was awarded to the exhibit.

J. Hartley, Esq., Morley, exhibited a nice group of Orchids, which
included good plants of Odontoglossum grande, O. Lambeauianum,
Cattleya Fabia, and a fine Cattleya Hardyana, which received a First-
class Diploma.

Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Westgate Hill, Bradford, also had a small
exhibit of interesting Orchids, which was awarded a Bronze Medal.

CYPRIPEDIUM BELLATULUM AND ITS HYBRIDS.
ALTHOUGH remarkable strides have been made in the cultivation, and more
especially in the hybridization, of this genus, it must be confessed that
similar success has not been achieved in the culture of Cypripedium
bellatulum. In very few establishments are plants to be found in flourishing
condition, and one repeatedly hears that they lack good constitution and
are of difficult culture. Where, however, the facilities exist for giving them

- genial surroundings, and the plants are entrusted to an_ intelligent

cultivator, who studies their wants, the results will be in every way
satisfactory for well-bloomed plants of C. bellatulum are very beautiful,

354 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [NOVEMBER, 1913.

and of good shape and well-defined colouring. The following is a brief
outline of the method of culture :—

Cypripedium bellatulum requires to be given a light position near the
roof glass at the warmest end of the Cattleya house, and if the corner
selected be one where moisture does not condense quickly so much the
better, as drip is fatal to the plants. A warm moist atmosphere is needed
throughout the year, and damping the staging and between the pots should
be practised at frequent intervals, care being taken not to wet the foliage.
This Orchid must never be subjected to a lower temperature than 55°
Fahr. in winter, and will only need shade from direct sun. The most
important point in regard to the culture of C. bellatulum is watering.
Providing its immediate surroundings are kept moist, little water need be
applied direct. When at rest, and during the winter months, a dose should
be given only when the compost is inclined to dryness, but as the warmer
weather approaches more may be given. Care must be taken when
watering not to allow any water to touch the leaves, hence any overhead
syringing must never be practised. I find that the best way to water this
Orchid is to immerse the pot up to the rim ina pail of tepid rain water.
Repotting should only be performed when the soil becomes exhausted, and
this operation is best carried out about a fortnight after flowering. Use
plenty of clean broken crocks, and for compost a mixture of good yellow
loam, limestone, and brick rubble.

Many fine hybrids have been raised from this species, as many as thirty-
nine being enumerated in the Orchid Stud-book, fourteen of which are
secondary hybrids, and a good many additions have been made since. A
selection of them is appended :—

Chapmanii (bellatulum x Curtisii).
Cycnides (bellatulum x Swanianum).
Dora (bellatulum x Charlesworthii).
Gratrixiz (bellatulum x vexillarium).
Helena (bellatulum x insigne).
Hopkinsii (bellatulum x Mastersianum).
Hunteri (bellatulum x tonsum).
Lawrebel (bellatulum x Lawrenceanum).
Olenus (bellatulum x ciliolare).
Richmanii (bellatulum x barbatum).
Rolfei (bellatulum x Rothschildianum).
southgatense (bellatulum x Harrisianum).
Wottonii (bellatulum x callosum).

If care be taken’with these hybrids much pleasure can be derived from
them, as healthy plants are very floriferous, and are among the most
charming of the genus. C. ALwyn HarRISON.

aa ganagpaagpagg

pinteieeenietaseer sutra ts:

Novemper, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 355

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR NOVEMBER.

By J. T. Barker, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
SINCE writing my last the weather has taken a great change, and from
clear, bright skies we have had a quantity of rain, with its accompanying
clouds, and already we are experiencing quite dark and dismal weather.
This is not to the benefit of the plants, and every effort should be made to-
admit as much light as possible to the houses. Where the roofs of the
houses are hung with plants to a considerable extent some re-arrangement
will be necessary, so that those suspended from the roof do not impede the
light reaching those placed upon the stages.

TEMPERATURES.—The figures given last month for all the departments.
should be continued, so there is no reason to repeat them. If any difference:
is made it should be a slight reduction towards the minimum, or winter
temperatures, as given in the Januafy number. It is not wise to drop-
the temperatures all at once, or at any given time; a little discretion is-
needed, and should we experience a spell of mild, humid weather it will be
advisable to maintain the temperatures, and admit more air. Fresh air, if
properly admitted, never does harm ; it is draughts which do the mischief.

ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE.—With the gradual reduction of temperatures,
a corresponding gradual reduction of the amount of moisture in the
atmosphere is necessary. No definite rule can be laid down, as the
different houses vary considerably as regards their humidity.

VENTILATION.—The admission of air will, during the present month,.
need a great deal of attention, but, whenever practicable, fresh air must
be admitted. This fact by present-day cultivators is much more practised:
than formerly, and as time goes on is likely to become universal. Orchids.
are not coddled to the extent they were formerly.

WATERING is a matter which must be done carefully at this season.
Those plants which are in growth will require comparatively little, and
should be allowed to become dry before having it applied to them, whilst
those at rest will only require sufficient to keep them plump and healthy.
If at any time there should be a doubt as to a plant being sufficiently dry
to require water, let it remain until you are quite certain. Many Orchids.
are overwatered during the winter months, and receive an insufficient.
supply during the summer when in full growth.

STOKING.—During the present month this essential detail will require-
considerable attention, as upon the amount of care bestowed depends the
healthy or unhealthy surroundings of the plants. Too much fire heat is as
detrimental to plant life as too little. Stuffiness in the houses must always.
be avoided, a nice buoyant atmosphere, without too much fire heat, is the:
ideal condition.

356 LHE ORCHID REVIEW. [NoveMBER, 1y:3-

CATTLEyAS.—In this dull month there will be plenty to interest the
lover of this beautiful genus. . labiata and its many varieties will be in
‘loom, and at this season are much appreciated. There will also be a few
‘C. Dowiana and its variety aurea to add their charms to the picture.
Then, again, there are innumerable hybrids which flower at this season of
the year, making the Cattleya house of intense interest. How often do we
as modern Orchid growers realize the difficulties our predecessors had to
contend with in maintaining a succession of these lovely flowers the whole
yeat round? To-day it is quite an easy matter. C. Lawrenceana should
be afforded the lightest position available, near the roof glass at the
warmest end of the. house. Plants of'C. Trianz, and others which have
‘completed their growths, should be kept only just moist at the roots,
but as soon as the flower-spikes are observed to be pushing up at
the base of the sheaths they may receive more liberal supplies. C.
‘Gaskelliana and others which require repotting may be attended to as
soon as roots are observed pushing from the base of the current season’s
growth, keeping them on the dry side until the new roots are seen to be
nicely at work in the new compost. Excessive watering to new compost
is most harmful, not only causing its decomposition but also injuring the
plant. Many Cattleyas at this season make secondary growths, but I have
not found any ill effects from this, provided the plants are kept in a light
position and kept active until this growth is completed. It is often the
means of the plant making extra leads, and usually occurs with strong
robust specimens. Some varieties are more susceptible to this than others.
‘When once growth has started nothing is gained by checking it; the best
practice is to encourage it to develop as speedily as possible by placing
the plant in a good position and giving water whenever it is required.

CyYPRIPEDIUMS.—Those heat-loving Cypripediums, such as C. Lowii,
‘C. Rothschildianum, and hybrids of this class that are in need of new
rooting material, should be repotted as soon as possible. This section, not
being such rampant rooters as many others, it is not desirable to use too
darge pots. The winter-flowering Cypripediums should have their flower
‘spikes neatly tied up to their stakes as they become long enough.

PLEIONES.—As plants of P. lagenaria, maculata, Wallichii, and others
pass out of flower they should be repotted, and this should be done when
new roots are developing from the base of the new growths. Ordinary
‘shallow Orchid pans without side holes are the most suitable receptacles
for these plants. The old material should be shaken from the roots and all
dead or decayed portions cut away. The finest and largest bulbs should be
selected and made up into clumps of about a dozen or so in a six-inch pan,
the smaller-sized bulbs to the same number being placed in five-inch pans,
‘where they may be grown on for another season. The potting mixture

See arte outM mre

NOVEMBER, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. sary

may consist of the same material as used for the green-leaved Cypripediums,.
but must, owing to the smallness of the plants, be pulled into smaller
pieces. The pans should be filled one-third of their depth with clean crocks.
for drainage, and care should be taken not to damage the young roots
which are pushing, as they are very susceptible to injury. After potting,
the usual care and attention is necessary in the application of water to the
roots until the plants are nicely established. The plants should be grown
suspended during the winter months in a light position at the warm end of
the Intermediate house. The cooler-growing varieties, as P. humilis,
Hookeri, and yunnanensis, having completed their season’s growth, are
best suspended from the roof of the Odontoglossum house, and require only
sufficient water to maintain the pseudobulbs in a plump and _ healthy
condition. The re-pottirig may be done when their flowering season is past.

PHALZNopsis that are developing their flower spikes must now be
watered with great care ; especially so should foggy or bad weather prevail,.
large supplies being no longer needed. It is not good practice to dip the
plants or otherwise saturate the compost. Generally speaking I am
opposed to dribbling of water to plants, but in the case of Phalzenopsis
extreme care is necessary, especially at this season, in the application of
water to the roots. A slight sprinkling round the sides of the baskets,
sufficient to keep the sphagnum moss in a living condition, is all that is
necessary. All the tender, green-leaved species require careful watering,
and should not be subjected to direct sunlight, even in winter.

Mrxican La&.ias.—At the present time many of these plants, such as.
L. albida, L. autumnalis, L. Gouldiana, and the numerous varieties of L.
anceps are developing their Hower spikes, and care should be taken that
none of them are allowed to suffer injury from cold by touching the glass..
The flower spikes should be carefully tied down to neat stakes, so that they
derive all the benefit of whatever light and sunshine we may get. Wood-
lice at this season do irreparable damage to the roots, and should be
frequently searched for and destroyed. During the flowering season the
plants need only sufficient water to keep the compost moist, and afterwards.
still less will suffice, until growth recommences.

BaRKERIAS.—The different species of Barkeria are difficult to cultivate
for long together, and for that reason are very seldom seen. These plants
succeed under much the same conditions as Lelia anceps, exposed to
all the light possible, with a liberal supply of fresh air at all times.

DENDROBIUMS of the evergreen section, such as D. thyrsiflorum,
densiflorum, and allied species, have now finished their growths, and should
be placed in a cool intermediate temperature to rest. Afford them just
sufficient water to keep the leaves fresh and the pseudobulbs from
shrivelling. The leaves should occasionally be examined for red spider,.

358 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (NOVEMBER, 1913.

which may infest them whilst in their resting quarters. It is unnecessary
to state that this should be exterminated.

ODONTOGLOSSUM CITROSMUM generally thrives when grown suspended
in the Mexican house, but now that the plants are about completing their
growths, they will benefit from a slightly warmer and more genial
‘atmosphere until their growths are fully completed. The plants should
still be afforded plenty of water at the roots until the growth is finished.
Plants of O. grande, O. Schlieperianum, and allied species, as they pass
-out of bloom, should be induced to rest by being placed in a dry position in
a cool Intermediate house. . Insleayi and its varieties splendens and leo-
pardinum are producing flower spikes, and must have liberal treatment,
receiving water whenever they require it. After the flowers fade the plants
should be rested and treated in the same way as O. grande. Plants of O.
‘crispum and hybrids may in the early part of the month be repotted, should
they be in the desired condition, that is if the temperature can be
maintained at its proper figures. Where the temperatures run down
considerably during a spell of cold weather it had better be deferred until
the early spring months.

CG@LOGYNE CRISTATA and its varieties are nearing the completion of their
eason’s growth, and will soon be pushing flower spikes from the new
pseudobulbs, at which stage the supply of water at the roots should be
slightly reduced, but not to such an extent as to cause the plants to suffer.
Well-rooted, pot-bound specimens may receive at intervals, until the
flowering stage, weak manure water, preferably prepared from cow dung.
Those Ccelogynes, such as C. barbata, ocellata, and others, that are
‘developing flower spikes, should have water whenever they become dry.

CyMBIDIUMS.— Plants of C. Lowianum, C. Tracyanum, and the many
hybrids that are now showing their flower spikes, should have water
whenever the compost becomes dry, whilst others that are backward in
this respect should be kept on the dry side until their spikes are observed
to be pushing. Plants of C. grandiflorum that have finished their growth
and are pushing flower spikes should be placed in a cool, light position, and
the roots kept on the dry side during the winter. If kept at all moist
‘during the winter months the flower buds invariably turn black and fall off.

GENERAL REMARKS.—The season has now arrived when the cleansing of
the houses and their inmates must have attention. The glass must be made
thoroughly clean, to admit every atom of light possible, and the woodwork,
walls, and stages to destroy any pest which infect such places. The
eradication of all insect pests is more easily accomplished during the
winter months than in the busy growing season, therefore this work should
be pushed on rapidly. It is needless to state that if such work is to be
effectual it must be done thoroughly.

NOVEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 353

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.

Two meetings of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the Royal
Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, during November, on the
4th and 18th. The first will be a Special Show of autumn-flowering
Orchids. The Orchid judging will commence at 10 a.m., and the
Committee will meet at 11.30 a.m. At the second meeting the Orchid
Committee will meet at the usual hour, 12 o’clock noon. The succeeding
meeting will be held on December 2nd.

The Manchester and North of England Orchid Society will hold
meetings at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on November 13th and 27th.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to the inspection
of members and the public from 1 to 4 p.m.

Mr. J. Harrison Dickx.—A representative gathering of members of the
Horticultural Press assembled at the Hotel Windsor, on September 11th,
and presented Mr. J. Harrison Dick with a gold watch, suitably inscribed,
and an illuminated address, to mark the occasion of his departure for
America. Mr. Dick has been for nearly twenty years connected with the
Journal of Horticulture, and for the last two years its chief Editor, and the
presentation bears testimony to the high esteem in which he is held among
his fellow pressmen. Mr. George Gordon made the presentation in a few
well-chosen words, and was supported by Mr. C. H. Curtis, Mr. John
Fraser, Mr. John S. Brunton, and others. Mr. Dick, who was to sail for
New York at: the-end of the month, suitably responded. The Journal of
Hlorticulture will in future be edited by Mr. Horace J. Wright, youngest
son of Mr. John Wright, V.M.H., and for some time assistant Editor of the
Agricultural Economist and Agricultural Review.

Mr. J. GurNEY Fow er, Treasurer of the Royal Horticultural Society,
and Chairman of the Orchid Committee, has taken possession of his new
estate, ‘‘ Brackenhurst,” Pembury, near Tunbridge Wells, Kent, and
desires that communications be sent to him there instead of to Glebelands,
South Woodford. The fine new block of houses is almost completed, and
the collection will soon be removed to its new quarters.

We learn that Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., have removed their Orchid
department to a new branch establishment at Jarvisbrook, Crowborough,
some eight minutes walk from Crowborough station, on the Brighton and
Tunbridge Wells line, and that the removal of the plants is now completed.
A notice appears in our advertisement pages, and a visit of inspection is
cordially invited.

As notified last month, Messrs Flory & Black have now taken over the

360 THE ORCHID REVIEW. ~ [NOVEMBER, 1913,

Orchid Nursery of Messrs. J. Veitch & Sons, Ltd., at Langley, Slough, of
which they have acquired the freehold and the entire stock of seedling,
hybrid, and other Orchids. A notice appears in our advertisement pages,
and inspection of the establishment is cordially invited.

An Anglo-American Exposition, to celebrate the Centenary of Peace
and Progress in the Arts, Sciences, and Industries of the United States Of
America and the British Empire, will be held at Shepherd’s Bush from
May to October, 1914. A Horticultural, Arboricultural, and Forestry
Committee has been formed, with Sir Herbert Maxwell as Chairman and
Mr. George Gordon as Vice-Chairman, with Sub-committees for fruit,
flowers, forestry, and sundries. The Gardens of the Exhibition will be
completely transformed in a manner worthy of the occasion.

The Fourth International Botanical Congress will be held in London
from May 22nd to 2gth, rors. Organising and Executive Committees have
been appointed. Membership of the Congress, which entitles to all publica-
tioas, is conditional upon subscribing to its regulations and payment of fifteen
shillings, ladies accompanying members ten shillings. The work of the
Congress will include the different branches of Botanical Science and the
work of Nomenclature, Bibliography, and Documentation left over from the
Brussels meeting, in conjunction with the permanent Bureau and the
Executive Committee. English will be the official language of the
Congress, but any language may be used in the discussions.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

CATTLEYA ADULA GLEBE VAR.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 779, with fig.

CATTLEYA GASKELLIANA ALBA.—Journ. Hort., IyI3, li. p. 397, with fig.

CaTTLEYA HARDYANA ALBA.—Journ. Hort., 1913, ll. p. 397, with fig.

CATTLEYA Mossi (specimen).—Horticulture, 1913, p- 397. with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM PICTURATUM (a. well-flowered specimen). — Gard. Mag.,
1913, p. 797, with fig.

OpvoNTIODA CHARLESWORTHII.—Horticulture, I9I3, p. 401, with fig.
This has a branched panicle, and evidently belongs to O. Bradshawiz.

Onciptum LaNcEaNuM.—Gard. Chron., 1913, ii. pp. 278, 279, fig. 102.

VANILLA PLANIFOLIA (a fruiting braach).—Journ. Hort., 1913, ii. p- 347;
with fig.

— 1.
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

E.A.—Lzliocattleya Robsoniz. The hybrid originally appeared in 1903.

G. H.H.—Pholidots articulata, Lindl. Many thanks for the reference.

J.U.H.—A very fine form of Cypripedium Leeanum.

Photographs received, with thanks.-—J,T.B.

Received with thanks—A.B.R., J.W., Sir H.M., H.G.A., E.A., J.C.J., H.B., F.W.T,
HG. f.U:Ry C.H. ;

{

tare ORC HED tey Lew.

Po. SRI DECEMBER, 1913. [No. 252.

THE R.H.S. HYBRID ORCHID REGISTER.

From the following letter, which has been issued from the Office of
the Royal Horticultural Society, Vincent Square, Westminster, it will
be seen that the proposed Hybrid Orchid Register (see p. 297) has now
taken definite shape :—
** November 28th, 1913.

“The President and Council, acting on the recommendation of a
Sub-Committee of the Orchid Committee, have decided to establish a
Register of Hybrid Orchids at Vincent Square. Mr. R. A. Rolfe, of Kew,
has been appointed Recorder. The Register will include all known Orchids.

‘“The President and Council accordingly invite Orchid raisers and
growers, amateur and professional, to bring their Hybrids, when in flower
for the first time (even though they may not then be sufficiently developed
to enter for award), and to enter the name and parentage of the plant,
together with the exhibitor’s name and address, on a Registration Form,
which can be obtained from the R.H.S.' Office, Vincent Square, S.W-
This Registration Form should be sent with the plant, and it will be
placed before the Orchid Committee, who, after satisfying themselves that
the name is in order, will enter it on the Register. Once so recorded the
name must be recognised. for all crosses of similar parentage when
subsequently shown, unless valid reason can be otherwise produced.

““W. WILKS, Secretary.”

This Register will thus be of an International character, and, being
compiled in harmony with the Vienna and Brussels Rules of Nomenclature,
its value in securing a uniform system of Hybrid Nomenclature will be
incalculable. It now remains for all Orchidists to co-operate in placing the
system upon a permanent footing, and we have no doubt that when once
the necessity of such a standard is recognised they will respond loyally.
There may be a few difficulties at first, which may be regarded as the
inevitable legacy of the past, but they will vanish with the determination

to surmount them.
361

362 THE ORCHID REVIEW. DECEMBER, 1913-]

There are one or two matters in which hybridists can render valuable
assistance. In collecting the records from all available sources a large
number of hybrids have been found without record of parentage, or with
doubtful or contradictory records, and it is possible that this in some cases
may have arisen through inadvertence, sometimes on the part of the
reporter in failing to copy the record supplied with the exhibit. In some
cases hybrids have been overlooked altogether, and in various ways have
failed to get recorded. The present arrangement will afford an opportunity
of remedying the omission, and it would facilitate the matter if such
records were sent to the Recorder direct. The desirability of furnishing
such records will be seen from the fact that only those hybrids can be
admitted whose parents are known. This is inevitable, because the
Register is to be kept in triplicate, each hybrid appearing three times over,
under first parent, second parent, and name of hybrid. In order to be
admitted the record of a hybrid must be complete, and the present
opportunity should be taken of remedying any known deficiencies, each
raiser supplying deficiencies in the records of his own productions. We
now commend the matter to the earnest attention of Orchidists without
distinction of nationality.

ODONTOGLOSSUM GRANDE.
BoTANICALLY, no doubt, Odontoglossum grande reveals itself as an
Odontoglossum, but one or two differences seem worthy of consideration.
Its bulb is, in my opinion, quite different from the ordinary Odontoglossum,
also its leaves and mode of flowering, 7.c., the flower spike coming up with
the young growth; and altogether it looks to meas if it occupied a place
between the Oncidiums and the Odontoglossums. But perhaps the
strongest fact has yet to be considered, i.¢., so far as I know, it has not
been, and will not, cross with any other Odontoglossum. If there are
records I do not know of them, and I should like to ask if, to your know-
ledge, it has ever been done, and, if so, with what variety, and with what
result? Also have the flowers ever been shown? If it has not, I think this
perhaps the strongest argument in favour of its being ‘considered something
distinct from an ordinary Odontoglossum, but if it has my contention falls
to the ground. It would be interesting to have the experience of others on

this question. ' RicHARD ASHWORTH,
Ashlands, Newchurch, President of the Manchester and
Manchester. North of England Orchid Society.

Mr. Ashworth raises an interesting question. Odontoglossum grande
certainly does not bear much resemblance to the Odontoglossums of the
crispum group, and, we believe, has not been successfully hybridised with
them. One record of an experiment with O. grande occurs to us. About

DECEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 363

five years ago Dr. Otto N. Witt wrote, from Berlin: ‘“ Odontoglossum
grande is supposed to give negative results either way with all other
Odontoglossums excepting O. Insleayi and O. Schlieperianum. Last year
I determined to try for myself, and I fertilised two flowers of O. grande
with pollen of O. crispum. Two pods were formed, which grew to a large
size, but after about four months time both fell off in an unripe condition ”
{O.R., xvi. p. 349).

O. grande, Lindl., is the best known member of a small group of allied
Central American species, the others being O. Insleayi, Lindl., O.
Schlieperianum, Rchb. f., and O. Williamsianum, Rchb. f., and none of
them, so far as we know, have yielded hybrids. Curiously enough, O.
Insleayi was originally described by Lindley as Oncidium Insleayi,
Barker, and as such was figured by Bateman, while of O. grande Lindley
wrote: ‘Certainly this is a most extraordinary plant. Its habit is
altogether that of Odontoglossum, with which its unguiculate lip and
peculiar column also correspond ; but the tubercles at the base of the lip
are those of Oncidium.”

It is very difficult to separate Odontoglossum from Oncidium by
‘absolute characters. When Lindley monographed the genus, in 1852, in
‘his Folia Orchidacea, he remarked that it was chiefly distinguishable: by its
column being long, and usually narrow at the base, or at all events not
tumid there. He added, ‘‘and by the base of the lip being parallel with
the face of the column,” but this does not always apply. Bentham also
remarked : ‘‘ The genus is, upon the whole, a natural one, though some-
times very difficult to separate from Oncidium, and occasionally thrown
into confusion by the introduction of species which do not correspond to
the generic character. Thus O. roseum, Lindl., is a Cochlioda, O.
vexillarium, Rchb. f., has rather the characters of Miltonia, &c.”
Odontoglossum contains several distinct sections, of which the O, grande
group is one of the most distinct, but we think that no better place
for it can be found. There are many genera which contain very distinct
‘Sections.

Speaking of hybrids reminds us that we saw the other day, in the
collection of the Hon. N. C. Rothschild, Ashton Wold, Oundle, a capsule
-of O. grande obtained by crossing with the pollen of Zygopetalum Mackayi.
It was eleven months old and apparently perfectly healthy. The plant was
throwing up a new flower-spike. It will be interesting to see whether the
seeds are plump, and especially to see if seedlings are obtained. The
‘Teverse cross was made at the same time, and Mr. Wright showed us some
-of the seeds, which seemed plump and good. Some have already been
‘sown, but we fear that it seedlings are obtained they may simply reproduce
ithe Zygopetalum, as in other crosses between the two genera.—ED.

364 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913-

ORCHIDS AT KEW.
DurinG the past few weeks the weather has been particularly favourable
for keeping Orchid flowers, as usually during November such subjects as.
Lelias, Cattleyas, and more particularly Calanthes and Dendrobium
Phalenopsis, are almost invariably spoilt by fogs in this district. This.
year, fortunately, we have had no bad fogs up to the time of writing, and
both the warm and cool divisions present a good display of flowers.

Some capital forms of Cattleya labiata may be seen, also various hybrids.
of C. Dowiana, C. Bowringiana, and others, one plant of C. Portia havinga
spike with a dozen good flowers. Leliocattleya Tyresias (L.-c. elegans.
var. Turneri X C. Bowringiana), is a very robust grower, and is now
bearing large trusses of flowers, which are good in shape and colour. The
diminutive Cattleya luteola is also in bloom, among many others.

A few of the most interesting subjects in the Cool house may be
mentioned. Stenoglottis longifolia is a terrestrial spectes which produces a
very pleasing effect when several plants are intermixed with other autumn-
blooming subjects, and the flowers last for weeks in_ perfection-
Stenoglottis thrive in a mixture of leaf mould two parts, and peat and
sphagnum each one part, with a little sand added. Several species of
Lycaste are flowering freely, L. lasioglossa and L. gigantea being the best.
One plant of the latter is remarkably fine, having fifteen large greenish-
brown flowers from two bulbs. The pretty blue Dendrobium Victoria-Regina
is suspended from the roof of the Cool house close to Sophronitis cernua,
uow flowering profusely, and the two give a most pleasing effect. Near
them are plenty of Cypripedium insigne Sandere, Fairrieanum, Charles-
worthii, and several of their hybrids, with Masdevallia tovarensis and others.

Among the many things to be seen in bloom in the warm division are
two good plants. of Oncidium bicaliosum, and the very distinct O.
cucullatum, and these, like most of the other members of the genus, will
last for weeks in flower. The charming little Cirrhopetalum campanulatum
is again in bloom, and is much admired. Numerous Cypripediums are
also flowering, including good forms of Mancunian, Actzus, and Maudie,
with many of the familiar autumn-flowering hybrids.

ODONTOGLOSSUM PESCATOREI: SPECIMEN PLANT.

(See Frontispiece).
Tue Frontispiece to the present volume consists of a magnificent specimen:
of Odontoglossum Pescatorei, from the collection of Lt.-Col. Sir George
L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt, for which Mr. H. G. Alexander received
a Cultural Commendation from the R.H.S. on April zoth, rg09. It bears
three spikes and an aggregate of 155 flowers, and forms quite a picture.

SS ee ee et es ene

DECEMBER, 191 3-] ZTHE ORCHID REVIEW. 365

CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR DECEMBER.

By J. T. Barker, The West Hill Gardens, Hessle, E. Yorks.
THE climatic conditions experienced during the past month have been
abnormal, and the amount of light has been most beneficial to all Orchids.
Owing to the very favourable season plants have made satisfactory growth,
and with the delightful autumn sunshine this growth is well-ripened, and
undoubtedly will produce flowers abundantly when the flowering season
comes round. We have again reached the period when we can sum up the
results of our practice, either successfully or otherwise. During the short,
dull days of December it is a very easy matter for plants to go wrong, in
spite of all the cultivator can do for them, especially where the houses are
crowded, or convenience is limited.

TEMPERATURES.—The temperatures of all the divisions will reach their
lowest point during the present month, and should, with slight variation,
be kept at the figures given in the January number. One or two errors are
often made as regards the winter temperatures of Orchid houses. An
excessive amount of fire heat is most detrimental to the plants, as it not
only undermines their constitution but also dries up the compost, which
entails unnecessary labour in watering to keep the plants from shrivelling,
and also causes the compost to become sour and decomposed. A low,
damp atmosphere must be strictly guarded against during the winter
months, as these conditions bring nothing but trouble, and should the
temperatures fall below the requisite degree in any of the divisions, no
harm will accrue provided a dry atmosphere is maintained. Most of the
evils with which we as Orchid growers are troubled are attributable to a
faulty atmosphere in the houses and careless watering. Thrip and other
insect pests are also encouraged, likewise the much-dreaded spot disease,
which is generally brought about by one excess or the other.

WATERING AND VENTILATION.—These two important matters will need
great attention, especially during wet, cold weather. As regards the
application of water to the compost I must again urge the necessity of
moderation, always being sure water is required before applying it. In the
matter of ventilation it should be always a rule to have a little air on some-
where, in all the divisions, as it does away with those ‘‘ stuffy ’’ conditions
which are prevalent in many houses. Some growers are apt to ridicule
the more modern treatment of fresh air to our houses, but I am firmly
convinced that this is a point where many go wrong, and that the great
improvement made in Orchid culture is due to the more rational methods
adopted at the present day. It is not so much on general principles where
the great mistakes are made but in the smaller details of our practice.

MILTONIA VEXILLARIA AND ITS HYBRIDS.—The summer-flowering

366 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913-

varieties of these useful Orchids, which were potted as advised a few
months ago, will now be in active growth, and may have water applied to:
them whenever they become dry. Between each application the compost
should be allowed to become fairly dry. They delight in a moderately damp
position, in a warm Cattleya house, during the winter months, and should:
be elevated well up to the light. The autumn-flowering varieties of M.
vexillaria, Leopoldii and superba, which are at present in flower, or have
just passed out of bloom, may be repotted if the young growths are of
sufficient strength and about to push new roots. The type of M. vexillaria
known as M. v. robusta, which flowers later than the summer-flowering
varieties, may be treated in precisely the same manner as the autumn-
flowering varieties. The hybrids, M. Bleuana and M. Hyeana, which are
irregular in their flowering season, may have new compost given them.
whenever the young growths are in the desired condition. By close
observation of these trifling matters plants may be potted with a minimum.
amount of risk almost at any season. It is surprising that so many do not
succeed with these’plants. Should cold weather prevail, necessitating more
fire heat to maintain the temperatures, constant watch must be kept for
yellow thrip and other insect pests, which, if not eradicated, do irreparable ©
harm. A good pair of eyes is a valuable asset to the cultivator.
PHAL#NopSIS.—These Orchids are among the most difficult to manage
during the winter months. The succulent and sensitive nature of their
leaves, and the absence of pseudobulbs, make them specially susceptible to
injury, which renders extreme care and watchfulness necessary on the part
of the grower. The leaves this season are well consolidated, and will be
better able to withstand hardships than they otherwise would. The well-
ripened plants should pass the winter quite safely in a temperature of about
60°, provided the atmosphere is maintained in a fairly dry condition. A
superabundance of moisture, either at the roots or in the atmosphere, is
most harmful to these succulent plants during the winter months. When
the tips of the roots are sealed over only sufficient to keep the leaves
plump and prevent shrivelling is necessary. Those plants that have not
finished their growth should be kept growing gently through the winter.
ZYGOPETALUMS.—As these plants are now growing freely, they wilh
require water whenever they become dry at the roots. The popular Z.
Mackayi produces its flower spikes at this season, and owing to their colour
are most acceptable. When in full growth these plants require an abundant
supply of water, and, as their thick fleshy roots resent a sour compost, it
may be advisable when flowering is over to repot any that may be in need of
new rooting material. A suitable compost is the kind advised for green-
leaved Cypripediums. Z. Mackayi, Z. crinitum, Z. Clayi, and several
others grow well in a warm shady corner of the warm Intermediate house,

DEcEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 367

elevated near to the glass to receive as much light as possible. The rare
Z. Ballii, now in flower, requires the same treatment as Z. Mackayi. Z.
maxillare and Z. m. Gautieri will thrive under the same conditions, but
succeed best grown on the pieces of tree fern on which they are usually
imported. They are now at rest, and should be suspended from the roof
of the same house, and be kept moderately moist at all times. The
Intermediate house is also the best place to grow such bigeneric hybrids as
Zygocolax Veitchii and others. They succeed under precisely the same
conditions as Zygopetalums. Zygopetalum rostratum and Z. Roeblingianum
should be grown in the warm, moist, plant stove, whilst Z. Burkei requires
Cool house treatment. The miniature Promenza xanthina, stapelioides,
and Rollisonii also succeed suspended from the roof of the Cool house.

CyYPRIPEDIUMS.—The winter-flowering Cypripediums need no words of
recommendation from me, as their floriferousness, the ease with which they
can be grown, and the lasting quality and beauty of their flowers are all
well known. Another great consideration to those who live in large towns,
or near them, is that they suffer less from fog than almost any other Orchid.
Cypripediums are always in active growth, hence absolute dryness at the
roots is injurious. During their flowering season the minimum amount of
moisture at the roots is required. But whenever the compost becomes dry
the plants should have water afforded them, care being taken that they
become fairly dry between each application. A moist atmosphere must be
maintained always, but care should be taken to prevent a saturated one
with alow temperature. During their flowering period a night temperature
from 55° to 60°, with a slight rise during the day, will suffice.

ODONTOGLOssuMS.—The species and the many hybrids of this genus
that were potted in September may be afforded more liberal supplies of
water at the roots, in accordance with their requirements. The new roots
will by this time have made considerable progress in the new compost,
hence they will take up more moisture. The usual precautions are
necessary against the compost becoming in a saturated condition.

L#LIA ANCEPS will be in flower; also L. albida, autumnalis, and
Gouldiana, and with the aid of the numerous Cattleya and Leliocattleya
hybrids it is now possible to make the Cattleya house quite gay at the
festive season, when their beautiful flowers are much appreciated. When
these plants pass out of flower, only sufficient water is needed to keep
the pseudobulbs fresh and plump. The atmosphere should be kept
moderately moist to prevent attacks of insect pests, and fresh air, according
to external conditions, should always be afforded them.

CaTTLEYAS.—Plants of Cattleya Warneri that are now starting into
growth should be placed well up to the light at the warmest end of the
house, and until the plants open their flowers water sufficient to keep the

368 THE ORCHID REVIEW. (DECEMBER, 1913.

compost moist should be given. Any that are in need of new rooting
material should be attended to as soon as the new roots are seen to be
pushing from the base of the pseudobulbs. The general repotting of this
genus is best deferred until after the flowers fade, as at that season
numerous roots push out from the base of the newly-made pseudobulbs,
and the compost being kept on the dry side induces the plant to take a rest.

There are numerous Cattleyas, Leliocattleyas, Sophrocattleyas,
Brassocattleyas, and plants of similar nature, which are in various stages
of growth, and must have water afforded them with discretion during the
dull days of the present month, when evaporation is at its very lowest
point. Care should be taken in maintaining the temperature at the
desired point, as the roots of this family are of a sensitive nature, and,
like all Orchid roots, are easily injured by a chill or excessive moisture.
The atmosphere of the house in which the flowering plants are ering may
with safety be kept on the dry side at this season.

CALANTHES.—As varieties of the Calanthe vestita section pass out of
flower the plants should be placed in a dry position, close to the roof of a
Warm house, where the light will assist to mature the pseudobulbs.
Water must be withheld till after the plants are repotted in the spring.

VANDA TERES, having now completed its growth, and the tips of the
roots being sealed over, should be allowed a long season of rest, affording
only sufficient water to prevent shrivelling. They should receive all the
light possible, in a house having an intermediate temperature. — V.
Hookeriana and the hybrid V. Joaquimiz should: remain in the Warm
house until their growth is completed. V. Amesiana, Kimballiana, and
Watsonii, whilst pushing their flower-spikes, should have the compost kept
moist, but the supply of water should be reduced as soon as the flowers
expand, which will keep them a longer time in good condition. ‘When
their flowering period is over only sufficient water should be given to
prevent shrivelling. These plants need a long rest, and are capable of
withstanding considerable drought without injury.

GENERAL REMARKS.—The chief aim of the cultivator at this season
should be to keep those plants which are at rest practically dormant, and
those that are in a growing state slowly progressing. Growth will be slow
at this season, and nothing will be gained in the end by pushing it. The
cleansing of the plants and the house will take up considerable time, and
should be brought to a conclusion as speedily as possible, so that with the
new year we may be able to deal with matters as they come to hand. I
will close my remarks for the year with what I consider the cardinal
points of our practice, namely the careful use of the water-pot, cleanliness
in all things, a supply of fresh air to the plants whenever possible, and
persistent watchfulness against insect and other pests.

IFCEMBER, 191 3.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 369

ANGRACUM RECURVUM.
THE annexed figure represents the striking Madagascar Angraecum
recurvum which was exhibited at the Royal. Horticultural Society’s
meeting held on November 18th last, by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.,
Haywards Heath, and received an Award of Merit. The photograph
was kindly forwarded by the exhibitors, and represents the flowers about

cr

f natural size. The flowers are pure w

—

lite, and are borne singly on

ct

ha

Fig. 65. ANGR#CUM RECURVUM.
slender axillary pedicels, the spur being slender and about twice as long
as the segments. The leaves, which are not shown in the photograph, are

r

larger than in the one originally figured by Thouars (Orch. Iles. Afr., t. 25).

It is a very distinct and striking species.

37° THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ DECEMBER, 1913

SOCIETIES.
RoyaL HorTICULTURAL.

A MEETING was held at the Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square,
Westminster, on November 4th, when there was a good show of Orchids,
though nothing comparable with the magnificent display seen at the
special meeting held a year ago. Whether the arrangements were altered
because of the autumn show held at Ghent in the previous week we cannot
say, but the notices in the arrangements that Orchid judging would
commence at ten o’clock, and that the Orchid Committee would meet at
11.30, were not carried out, and the meeting resolved itself into the ordinary
fortnightly one. The awards consisted of six medals, six Awards of Merit,
and three Cultural Commendations.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), W. Bolton, Gurney Wilson, S. W. Flory,
W.H. White, Arthur Dye, H. G. Alexander, J. E. Shill, G. Hunter, W. H.-
Hatcher, J. Cypher, J. Charlesworth, C. H.. Curtis, A. McBean, T.
Armstrong, F. J. Hanbury, R. G. Thwaites; R. A. Rolfe, de Barri Crawshay,
Sir Harry J. Veitch, and Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart.

Sir Jeremiah Colman, Bart., Gatton Park, Reigate (gr. Mr. Collier),
staged a charming group, consisting of about twenty plants of the very
distinct Cattleya Portia ccerulea—the best bearing an eight-flowered spike
-—together with the two parents, C. Bowringiana violacea and C. labiata
coerulea, all of which have flowers of a peculiar light slaty blue shade.
There was also a plant of C. Portia Lady Colman, a fine purple form with
an exceptionally large flower (Silver Banksian Medal).

Lt.-Col. Sir George Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr. Alexander),
sent the handsome Odontioda Latona Westonbirt var., bearing ten fine
flowers, and Cattleya Esther (Gaskelliana x Cleopatras a bright rose-
coloured hybrid with the front of the lip crimson.

W. Waters Butler, Esq., Southfield, Edgbaston (gr. Mr. Jones), sent
three good Cattleya labiata, the variety Minnie being very richly-coloured.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchidhurst, Twyford, sent Odontioda Gladys
(Odontoglossum Rossii rubescens x Odontioda Bradshawiz), a pretty
hybrid, having the sepals and petals spotted with Indian red, and the lip
rose with a yellow crest.

F. Ducane Godman, Esq., South Lodge, Horsham, sent a spies form of
Cattleya Mantinii, with lavender-tinted flower.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. W. H. White),
sent the pretty white Vanda Kimballiana alba, Cypripedium Vogelsang var-
punctatum, a well-spotted form, Cattleya Clarkie, and two fine forms of C-
Fabia, one bearing two five-flowered spikes.

DECEMBER, 1913.] THt ORCHID REVIEW. 378

W. R. Lee, Esq., Plumpton Hall, Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), sent the:
fine Cypripedium King George V., and Odontoglossum crispum xanthotes-
Golden Star, bearing a spike of twelve fine flowers, with deep golden
blotches on the sepals and lip.

His Grace the Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace (gr. Mr. Hunter),-
sent Cypripedium Lord Ossulston Blenheim var., a handsome form.

C. J. Phillips, Esq., Sevenoaks (gr. Mr. Bucknell), sent Cattleya
Hardyana alba, with white sepals and petals and a richly-coloured lip, and.
a very red form of Oncidioda Cooksoniz with a well-developed panicle.

Pantia Ralli, Esq., Ashtead Park, Epsom (gr. Mr. Farnes), sent:
Odontoglossum ashteadense, a dark claret-coloured flower with a few white
markings, and the front of the lip white.

R. G. Thwaites, Esq., Chessington, Streatham, sent Cattleya labiata
alba, and a prettily blotched Odontoglossum.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent
Cypripedium Little Gem Westfield var., a well-coloured hybrid of good:
shape.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a very fine group,
including the handsome Paphinia cristata with a two-flowered scape, fine-
forms of Cattleya Dowiana aurea, labiata, Portia, Hardyana, Venus,
Tityus, Enid, Whiteleyz, Fabia, and a good C. Fabia alba, several good
Oncidium Forbesii and varicosum, a richly-coloured Cypripedium Rolfei,.
well-flowered examples of Epidendrum vitellinum autumnale and Maxillaria
nigrescens, Odontoglossum Dora, O. armainvillierense xanthotes, and:
others (Silver-gilt Flora Medal),

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, staged a fine group,
including some good Lzliocattleyas, Brassolelia Veitchii, Cypripedium
insigne Harefield Hall var., C. Gaston Bultel vars. King Edward VII.,-
Germaine Opoix, and Mrs. Spender Clay. Odontoglossum Cooksonii Xx
Rolfez, yellow with brown blotches, Cattleya Dusseldorfii Undine, C..
Armstrongie, Hardyana, forms of C. Fabia, Mantinii, and other good
hybrids of C. labiata and Bowringiana (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Jarvisbrook, Sussex, staged a bright and-
pretty group, including good forms of Dendrobium Phalznopsis, D. P.
album, D. superbiens, Oncidium Forbesii and varicosum, Vanda ccerulea,
Brassocattleya Leemanniz, the rare Lelia Perrinii nivea, Leliocattleya
Ophir, Cypripedium Maudiz, Phalenopsis amabilis, Cattleya Fabia, C.
labiata, and the white-petalled varieties alba, Cooksonii and reedleyensis.
(Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, staged a good group,
including Cattleya labiata, Bowringiana, Pittiz, and Minucia, Dendrobium
Phalznopsis, Cypripedium insigne Sanderz, C. Sir Redvers Buller, C.-

-372 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [ DECEMBER, 1913-

‘Leeanum Clincwbervanei, Phalznopsis amabilis, and others (Silver
Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, staged an interesting and varied
group, including some good Cattleya Fabia, Hardyana, Peetersiz,
Cooksonie, and C. Dusseldorfii Undine, Leliocattleya Saphirata (L.-c.
-Canhamiana X C. maxima), a large blush white hybrid, veined with rose on
the lip, Cypripedium Harold (hirsutissimum xX Leeanum), C.. insigne
Sanderz, C. Priam superbum, Cirrhopetalum Rothschildianum, Micholitzii
_and mundulum, Saccolabium acutifolium, Dendrobium ciliatum, Phalenopsis
Esmeralda, Bollea Lalindei, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Mr. H. Dixon, Spencer Park Nursery, Wandsworth Common, sent a
brightly-coloured form of Odontioda Cupid.

Messrs. Flory & Black, Orchid Nursery, Slough, sent a good form of
-Odontoglossum crispum, a fine Cattleya amabilis, Cypripedium Mary Lee,
and Brassocattleya Puritan (L.-c. Ascania X B. Digbyana), a pretty white
flower, with a fringed lip and some yellow on the disc.

Messrs. Hassall & Co., Southgate, sent a good group, including forms
-of Cattleya Dowiana aurea, labiata, Hassallii, Pitti, Minucia, a fine C.
Mantinii nobilior, and C. Sylvia (Fabia X Dowiana aurea), Cypripedium
Niobe with four flowers, C. Thalia Mrs. Francis Wellesley, and others.

Messrs. J. & A. McBean, Cooksbridge, staged a small group, including
‘the pretty Cymbidium Doris, Cattleya suavior, labiata, and Fabia alba,
Brassocattleya Hyew and Leemanniz, Odontioda Thwaitesii, Diana, and
Bradshawiz, Oncidium cheirophorum, well-grown plants of Odontogiossum
Pescatorei, and others.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

CATTLEYA ANDREANA MCBEAN’s VAR. (Dowiana aurea x Pittize).—A
handsome flower, having rose-purple sepals and petals with a tinge of
yellow, and the lip crimson-purple with golden yellow throat and base.
Exhibited by Messrs. J. & A. McBean.

CyPRIPEDIUM EsTELLA (Godefroye xX Fairrieanum).—A dwarf and
pretty hybrid, fairly intermediate in shape, and having the flower dotted
and reticulated with purple on a cream-yellow ground. Exhibited by
Messrs. Sander & Sons.

CyPRIPEDIUM OLympus (Alcibiades X Leeanum Clinkaberryanum).—A
‘very fine hybrid, having a broad white dorsal sepal with a green base and a
few purple lines, and the petals and lip greenish yellow tinged with brown.
Exhibited by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

L#LIOCATTLEYA OLENUS BLENHEIM VAR. (L.-c. bletchleyensis x C.
Dowiana aurea).—A very fine form, having broad purple-rose sepals and
petals, anda dark ruby red lip, with yellow veining in - throat. Exhibited
iby His Grace the Duke of Marlborough. °

DECEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 373-

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPUM XANTHOTES WESTONBIRT VAR.—A_ very
beautiful form, having very broad segments, with deep golden yellow
blotches on:the sepals and lip. The spike bore eleven flowers. Exhibited
by Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford.

SOPHROCATLALIA NIOBE (L.-c. Gottoiana xX S.-l. heatonensis).—A
handsome hybrid, having large bright reddish rose sepals and petals, with a
darker lip, and some yellow in the throat. Exhibited by Messrs. Charles-
worth & Co.

CULTURAL COMMENDATIONS

CG@LOGYNE FIMBRIATA.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to Sir
Trevor Lawrence, Bart., for a very large and well-flowered specimen.

ODONTOGLOSSUM CRISPO-HARRYANUM THE DELL var.—To Mr. J. E.
Shill, grower to Baron Bruno Schréder, The Dell, Englefield Green, for a
large and well-flowered plant, bearing a spike of fourteen very fine flowers.

SIGMATOSTALIX RADICANS.—To Mr. W. H. White, Orchid grower to Sir
Trevor Lawrence, for a very large.and profusely-flowered specimen.

At the meeting held on November 18th there was a very fine show of
Orchids, and the awards consisted of seven medals, six Awards of Merit,
and one Cultural Commendation.

Orchid Committee present: J. Gurney Fowler, Esq. (in the Chair),
Messrs. J. O’Brien (hon. sec.), de Barri Crawshay, Gurney Wilson,.
F. Sander, R. G. Thwaites, F. J. Hanbury, T. Armstrong, A. McBean,
C. H. Curtis, W. Cobb, J. Charlesworth, J. Cypher, W. H. Hatcher, J. E.
Shill, W. P. Bound, Arthur Dye, W. H. White, S. W. Flory, W. Bolton,
C. J. Lucas, R. B. White, and Sir Harry J. Veitch.

Lt.-Col. Sir George L. Holford, K.C.V.O., Westonbirt (gr. Mr-
Alexander), sent Cypripedium Gulliver (Mrs. Wm. Mostyn x Sultan), a
remarkably dark-coloured hybrid, having the dorsal sepal purple-black
below, with a broad whitish margin, and the petals and lip very dark
purple-brown.

Mrs. Norman Cookson, Oakwood, Wylam (gr. Mr. Chapman), sent
Cypripedium Chapmaniz superbum (Fairrieanum x Calypso), with much
purple veining on the dorsal sepal, two distinct forms of Odontioda
oakwoodiensis (O. Bradshawize x Odontoglossum percultum), a very
pretty rosy flower spotted with cinnamon-brown, and O. Hippolyta
Cookson’s var., a very fine form, having the flower almost entirely orange-
brown with a white margin.

E. H. Davidson, Esq., Orchid Dene, Twyford, sent Sophrolelia Sunray
(S.-l. Marriottiana X L. cinnabrosa), with elongate brown sepals, deep
yellow petals, and a dark purple lip, Sophrocattleya Saxa, Odontoglossum.
nigrescens, and handsome forms of O. Aireworth, Gladys, and illustre.

-374 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913.

Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bart., K.C.V.O., Burford (gr. Mr. W. H. White),

-sent a fine orm of Brassocatlelia Triune (L.-c. Hyeana xX B.-c.

langleyensis), with lilac-rose sepals and petals, and a darker lip with some
_yellow in the throat.

C. J. Lucas, Esq., Warnham Court, Horsham (gr. Mr. Duncan), sent
‘Brassocattleya Maronii Warnham Court var., a very beautiful white variety
with a yellow disc to the lip.

E. G. Mocatta, Esq., Woburn Place, Addlestone (gr. Mr. Stevenson),
sent a good plant of Vanda Sanderiana with two spikes, Odontoglossum
Menier (gandavense x amabile), a fine hybrid, having the sepals and petals
well blotched with red-purple, O. azureum, a pretty light violet hybrid
margined with white, and O. illustre var. Maud, a pretty purple form, with
-a white margin to the sepals and petals and a white apex to the lip.

Mrs. Temple, Leyswood, Groombridge (gr. Mr. E. Bristowe), showed
-a promising hybrid Cattleya, derived from C. Mantinii and C. labiata.

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bridge Hall, Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), sent the
-charming Vanda ccerulea Wrigleyi, bearing a spike of ten beautiful white
flowers with a rose-pink lip.

Francis Wellesley, Esq., Westfield, Woking (gr. Mr. Hopkins), sent
Cypripedium Royal George, and Leliocattleya Lady Oliphant (L.-c. Norba

x C. Souvenir de Queen Victoria), having lemon yellow sepals and petals
-of good shape, and a rose-purple lip with numerous light yellow lines.

Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards Heath, staged a very fine group,
‘including the beautiful white Brassocattleya Veitchii Queen Alexandra,
‘Cattleya Portia, Fabia, Vulcan, Clarkiz, and Antiope, handsome forms of
Lzliocattleya Juno, Aureole, Bola, St.-Gothard, and amabilis, Sophro-

Catlelia Carna, Oncidium Forbesii and varicosum, Miltonia Bleuana, a
well-flowered plant of Maxillaria nigrescens, Vanda ccerulea, Epidendrum
~vitellinum, Odontioda Madeline and Brunette, Cypripedium Fairrieanum
x Niobe, much veined with purple, and a beautiful series of Odontoglossums
ASilver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Veitch & Sons, Chelsea, staged a very effective group,
‘the centre consisting of a number of pure white Calanthe Harrisii, with
-well-flowered C. Veitchii on each side, while the ends were made up with
plants of Cypripedium insigne Sander, Harefield Hall var., C. Leeanum,
Maudiz, and others, with a few good Odontoglossums (Silver Flora Medal).

Messrs. James Cypher and Sons, Cheltenham, staged a good group,
including a well-flowered plant of Masdevallia tovarensis, Miltonia Bleuana,
“Odontioda Bradshawiz, Cattleya Vulcan, Cypripedium Arthurianum
pulchellum, insigne Sanderz, Oddity, and Harefield Hall var., C. Venus
~var. Boltonii, Madame Jules Hye, Minos Veitchii, triumphans, Sir Redvers
Buller, and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

ee ge Ae eT Ie ee i ee Sn Pe eee Sg ah le ee eS CO Raibeng a aiapine guitarra

DECEMBER, 191 3,] TI7E ORCHID REVIEW. 375

Messrs. Flory & Black, Orchid Nursery, Langley, Slough, were awarded
a Silver Banksian Medal for a good group, including Brassocatlelia Morna,
Leliocattleya Osram (L.-c. Violetta x C. Dowiana aurea), a promising
lilac-rose hybrid with darker lip and some yellow in the throat, L.-c.
Taurus (L.-c. bletchleyensis x C. Bowringiana), having purple flowers with a
yellow blotch on the disc of the lip, Cattleya lucida, Cypripedium Germaine
‘Opoix, some good forms of C. Idina, Leeanum, Thalia, and others.

Messrs. W. B. Hartland & Co., Cork, staged a good group, including
Leliocattleya Parysatis, Cymbidium Tracyanum and Maggie Fowler,
‘Odontoglossum Groganie, Cypripedium insigne Sandere and Harefield
Hall var., C. Thalia Mrs. Francis Wellesley, C. fulshawense, Cattleya
Portia and others (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Hassall.& Co., Southgate, staged a small group, including good
forms of Cattleya Fabia, Portia, Hassallii, Mantinii, Dowiana aurea,
Sylvia, Pittiz, Cypripedium Niobe, fulshawense, Minos Youngil, Thalia
Mrs. F. Wellesley, the clear yellow C. insigne Gladys, and other good
forms (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Stuart Low & Co., Jarvisbrook, Sussex, staged a good group,
including Oncidium Forbesii and trulliferum, Miltonia Phalznopsis, Vanda
cerulea, Cattleya Dowiana, Rothschildiana, Fabia, the chaste white C.
labiata alba, and C. |. reedleyensis, the latter with an orange-yellow throat
to the lip, Sophronitis cernua, Odontioda Leeana, and a number of good
Cypripediums (Silver Banksian Medal).

Messrs. Armstrong & Brown, Tunbridge Wells, sent Cypripedium
Arthurianum Orchidhurst var. (insigne Harefield Hall var. x Fairrieanum),
much larger than the type and with large spots on the dorsal sepal, and
‘Odontoglossum promerens var. Bristoweanum (eximium x crispum
‘Graireanum), a well-coloured variety.

Messrs. Sander & Sons, St. Albans, sent Leliocattleya Mauretania
({Canhamiana x Martinetii), a handsome thing, with very broad rosy
sepals and petals and a rosy crimson lip, Cypripedium Royal Monarch
(bingleyense X Leeanum Clinkaberryanum), a very large flower, most like
the latter, but with a pretty rosy lilac suffusion on the dorsal sepal, and C.
insigne Louis Sander (i. Harefield Hall var. x i. McNabianum), most like
the former but with very dark blotches on the dorsal sepal.

AWARDS OF MERIT.

ANGRECUM RECURVUM.—A very striking Madagascar species, with large
fleshy leaves, and numerous solitary pure white flowers produced on long
slender peduncles from the lower part of the stem. Exhibited by Messrs.
Charlesworth & Co. (see figure on page 369).

CypRIPEDIUM CycLops (Acteus X alportense).—A handsome hybrid,
having a large concave green dorsal sepal, spotted with brown, and a broad

ES ae

376 THE ORCHID REVIEIWV. [DECEMBER, I913-

white margin, with the petals and lip shining brown. Exhibited by
Lt.-Col. Sir. G. L. Holford.

CYPRIPEDIUM SCHRGDERI VAR. KENTORE (cenanthum superbum X
Fairrieanum).—A very pretty dark variety, having the dorsal‘sepal: copiously
veined with purple on a light ground, and the petals and lip heavily marked
with chocolate purple. Exhibited by Messrs. Armstrong & Brown.

DENDRUBIUM LEEANUM LANGLEY VARk.—A fine plant, bearing two
spikes of bright rose-purple flowers, with an intense claret-purple lip.
Exhibited by Messrs. Flory & Black.

L#&LIOCATTLEYA FERONIA CHARLESWORTH’S VAR. (C. Enid xX L.-c-
Haroldiana).—A remarkably fine hybrid, bearing a spike of five flowers,
most like the former, and having very broad blush-pink sepals and petals,
and a bright purple lip, with some yellow in the throat. Exhibited by
Messrs. Charlesworth & Co.

MILTONIODA HaARWoOoDII SHRUBBERY VAR. (M. vexillaria x C-
Neetzliana).—A very fine form, bearing a spike of nine large magenta-
rose flowers, with the crest of the lip yellow. Exhibited by Messrs-
Armstrong & Brown.

CULTURAL COMMENDATION.

CATTLEYA PORTIA WESTONBIRT VAR.—To Mr. H. G. Alexander, Orchid
grower to Lt.-Col. Sir G. L. Holford, for a very strong plant, bearing three
spikes, each with seven large bright purple flowers.”

MANCHESTER & NoRTH OF ENGLAND ORCHID.

At the meeting held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on October
30th, 1913, the members of Committee present were: Rev. J. Crombleholme
(in the Chair), Messrs. R. Ashworth, J. Cypher, A. G. Ellwood, J. Evans,
A. Hanmer, W. H. Hatcher, J. Howes, J. Lupton, D. McLeod, C. Parker,
W. Shackleton, H. Thorp, Z. A. Ward, G. Weatherby, A. Warburton,
and H. Arthur (Secretary).

R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr. Mr. Gilden), staged a very fine
group, to which a Large Silver-gilt Medal was awarded. It contained
some good Odontoglossum crispum varieties, Odontioda Charlesworthii,
numerous Cypripediums and Cattleyas, Brassocattleya Maroniz, Lezelio-
cattleya luminosa aurea, Dendrobium Phalznopsis, and D. formosum.

A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden (gr. Mr. Dalgleish), was awarded a
Silver-gilt Medal for a fine group, including Cattleya labiata R. I. Measures,
Mrs. A. Warburton, reedleyensis, alba, and Cooksoniez, C. Fabia
ardentissima, Brassocattleya Veitchii Queen Alexandra (to which a Silver
Medal was awarded), with Cypripediums and Odontoglossums in variety.

W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr. Branch), was awarded a Silver-gilt
Medal for a choice group of Cypripediums, Odontoglossum crispum

|

iy

DECEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 377

xanthotes, O. Ceres Plumpton Hall var., Odontioda Charlesworthii, and
Miltonia Bleuana.

Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr. Weatherby), was awarded a
Large Silver Medal for a group of Odontoglossums in variety, some good
Cattleyas and choice Cypripediums, with a well- -grown plant of Dendrobium
formosum giganteum.

Wm. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange (gr. Mr. Howes), was awarded
a Silver Medal for a group of choice Cypripediums, Cattleyas, and
Odontoglossums.

Rev. J. Crombleholme, Clayton-le-Moors (gr. Mr. Marshall), staged a

‘small group of choice Cypripediums and Epidendrum vitellinum, a Silver

Medal being awarded.

Col. J. Rutherford, M.P., Blackburn (gr. Mr. Lupton), staged Cattleya
Fabia and Cymbidium erythrostylum.

O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr. Rogers), staged a pretty group,
including about thirty plants of Dendrobium Phalznopsis, three D. P.
album, Cypripedium Daisy Barclay, Watsonianum, Boltonii, and other
choice hybrids, Cattleya Fabia alba, Thurgoodiana magnifica, armain-
villierensis, and Mantinii nobilior, with Epidendrum vitellinum and
Dendrobium Dearii, a Special Vote of Thanks being accorded.

Messrs. Cypher & Sons, Cheltenham, received a Silver Medal for a nice
group of Cypripediums, with Cattleya Bowringiana sanguinea, and a good
C. Mantinii nobilior.

Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons, Bradford, were also awarded a Silver
Medal for a group of Cypripediums, Maxillaria picta, and others.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATE.

Cattleya Iris Walton Grange var., a very round flower, of good e even

colour, with bright lip, from Wm. Thompson, Esq.
AWARDS OF MERIT.

Cypripedium Actzus var. leucoxanthum (Bianca X Actzus) ; Odonto-
glossum ardentissimum Violette, and O. Plotinum (crispum Grarieanum x
luteopurpureum), from Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Odontoglossum Ne Plus Ultra, a well-grown plant, with two spikes
(a Cultural Certificate with Bronze Medal being awarded to the Gardener),
and Cattleya Armstrongiz var. Jasper, from Z. A. Ward, Esq.

Cattleya Isidor (Mantinii X gigas), from A. Warburton, Esq.

Odontoglossum amabile var. Bella Donna, from R. Ashworth, Esq.

Cypripedium Tracyanum var. virginale and Oncidium bicallosum,
from Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons.

At the meeting held on Thursday, November 13th, the members of
Committee present were:—Rev. J. Crombleholme (in the Chair), Messrs,

|

378 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913.

R. Ashworth, H. Bell, J. Cypher, J. Evans, J. Howes, F. K. Sander, W.
Shackleton, H. H. Smith, W. Thompson, G. Weatherby, and H. Arthur
(Secretary).

A Large Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to Messrs. Cypher & Sons,
Cheltenham, for a fine miscellaneous group, in which autumn-blooming
Cypripediums were particularly well represented.

A Silver-gilt Medal was awarded to R. Ashworth, Esq., Newchurch (gr.
Mr. Gilden), for a fine group of Cattleyas and Cypripediums, with Sophro-
catlelia Marathon var. Dulcie, Miltonia Bleuana, and others.

Large Silver Medals were awarded to A. Warburton, Esq., Haslingden
(gr. Mr. Dalgleish), for a fine group of Cypripediums, with Leeliocattleya
Decia alba, and others, and to Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., Haywards
Heath, for a fine representative group, largely consisting of hybrids.

Silver Medals were awarded to Z. A. Ward, Esq., Northenden (gr. Mr.
Weatherby), and Wm. Thompson, Esq., Walton Grange (gr. Mr. Howes),
for groups of choice varieties.

Interesting exhibits were staged by O. O. Wrigley, Esq., Bury (gr. Mr.
Rogers)—whose group included the beautiful Vanda coerulea Wrigleyi, V. c.
albens, and Cymbidium erythrostylum—H. Arthur, Esq., Blackburn; Mr.
W. Shackleton, Great Horton, Bradford, and Messrs. A. J. Keeling & Sons,
Westgate Hill, Bradford.

FIRST-CLASS CERTIFICATES.

Odontoglossum eximium var. rubrum, a self-coloured crimson flower of
beautiful shape, with white edges, and O. Helius, a larger flower of similar
colour, with large square flat lip, showing traces of Harryanum parentage,
from Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Cattleya labiata vexillaria La Vierge, a large, well-shaped white flower,
wih purple markings on the lip, and Miltonia ashlandensis (M. v. superba
X v. memoria G. D. Owen), a well-coloured flower, with a brilliant crimson
base to the lip, from R. Ashworth, Esq.

AWARDS OF MERIT. ;

Odontioda Bradshawie var. Aurora, Cattleya Phrygia, C. labiata
Athene, Cypripedium Estella, and C. San Actzeus var. The Queen, from
Wm. Thompson, Esq.

Odontoglossum percultum var. Brunette, from R. Ashworth Esq.

ORCHIDS AT HOLLYSPRING, ASCOT.
Tue Orchid collection at Hollyspring is not a large one, but it comprises
many rare species and a number of interesting hybrids. Three fine houses
are devoted to Orchids, namely, East Indian, Cattleya, and Cool houses,
and the majority of the plants grow vigorously, especially considering the
great variety in each house. The collection was brought together by the

DECEMBER, 1913.] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 379

late Col. Sheppee, who died in March last, and Mrs. Sheppee, in reducing
the collection, has made Kew the fine present of about 260 plants,’ including
several of those mentioned in the following notes.

In the Cattleya house at Hollyspring a very rare Orchid may now be
seen in flower, namely, Odontoglossum Londesboroughianum, a plant most
difficult to flower as a rule, but here it grows remarkably well, in a basket
suspended from the roof, and flowers freely. The stout, creeping rhizomes
and ovoid pseudobulbs give the plant the appearance of an Oncidium, as
also do the flowers, which are bright yellow, barred with brown. The
flower-spikes are about two and a half feet long. The plant requires
plenty of water whilst growing and drought when at rest, when it loses its
leaves and becomes quite dormant.

In the same house several plants of Cypripedium thrive, notably C,
Curtisii nobilior, which has very handsome foliage, C. Chamberlainianum,
C. Rothschildianum, C. philippinense, C. Stonei, and others, also a good
plant ot Brassia Lawrenceana. Cattleya Lueddemanniana isa very distinct
member of the genus which is now flowering freely. Several plants of the
fragrant Zygopetalum Mackayi are in bloom, also the rare Z. rostratum,
which seems to require a rather warmer temperature than other species of
the genus. There are also two nice plants of Arundina bambusifolia, both
flowering freely, and resembling Sobralia in some respects, though much
more slender in habit.

In the warm division many plants grow remarkably well. Cyrtopodium
punctatum is grown in a compost consisting chiefly of loam. This plant is
kept quite dry when resting, and the same applies to Peristeria elata.
Several species of Angreecum and Vanda grow well in this house. Of the
latter may be mentioned plants of V. Parishii, V. Bensonii, V. Denisoniana,
and a beautiful plant of the rare V. Sanderiana, all exceptionally clean and
healthy. Ccelogyne Dayana and plants of Ansellia africana also succeed
here. There is quite a number of Dendrobiums, both species and hybrids,
and these, as indeed nearly every genus in the collection, are exceedingly
well grown by Mr. Swanborough, who has been in charge of the collection
for about fourteen years. There are some good plants of Dendrobium
Dalhousieanum, D. fimbriatum oculatum, and, probably the best of all, a
good specimen of D. sanguinolentum album.

Many of the Cool house subjects are also grown well, among the
Masdevallias being some good plants of the beautiful M. tovarensis, and M.
Davisii, the latter having flowers of a rich yellow colour. Odontoglossum
pulchellum is represented by a few good examples, and there is a good
selection of the usual popular kinds. | Several species of Anguloa, Lycaste,
and many other plants are also growing quite happily in this interesting
collection. Op ee aa ; H.L

380 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, I913.

THE AMATEUR’S COLLECTION.

By C. ALwyn Harrison, F.R.H.S.
Now that the days are short and the cold weather is close upon us, it is
obvious that less air can be given, but, to prevent stagnation of the
atmosphere, endeavour to have the bottom ventilators open, if only for an
hour or two, every day, and by the employment of a little extra heat in the
pipes this should be possible, except in exceptionally severe weather.
Endeavour to keep the temperatures as even as possible, regarding 50°
Fahr. by day and 47° at night as the irreducible minimum. Cool house
Orchids can be grown where the thermometer is kept between 40° and 45°
Fahr. throughout the winter months, but one can better describe the plants
as existing rather than flourishing in such a low temperature, and I am
convinced that the nearer the temperature is kept to 50° Fahr. the sturdier
will be the growth of the plants.

Continue to clean and tie up the flowers of the winter-flowering
Cypripediums, and look over this class with special attention, as they are
subject to attacks of thrip. Any that are over should be moved to the
cooler end of the house, and kept rather on the dry side as regards watering.
Damping down should only. be done on fine days, and the plants themselves
must not receive any overhead syringing, as any water remaining in the
axils of the leaves or centre of new growths is liable to cause decay.

This is the best month to thoroughly clean the house, for, with the
advent of the new year, other important details will have to be performed.
The walls and staging of the house should be well washed with a strong
solution of insecticide, and previous to rearranging the plants scrub every
pot and dip each Orchid head downwards in a pail of weak tepid ‘‘ Abol ”
solution, taking care not to allow the soil to become wet. Then sponge the
plant with tepid rain water, remove any dead bulbs and leaves, and place it
in its correct position. All Orchids in bud or which are completing their
growth should be grouped together at the warmest end of the house, and
so placed that they each get the maximum amount of light. For this
reason the roof glass should be repeatedly washed inside and out, taking
care to remove the green slimy matter which collects under the laps of the
glass. This will enable any atmospheric moisture which collects to pass
away, and prevent drip.

Fire heat can be to some extent economised, and assistance given in
maintaining an even temperature, by lowering the blinds at night, or
covering the roof glass with thick mats. These should, however, be
removed early in the morning, so as not to prevent any possible light from
reaching the plants.

The house should be well supplied with flowering plants at this season,

DECEMBER, 1913.| THE ORCHID REVIEW. 381

as, besides the countless number of Cypripediums from which selection can
be made, there are many winter-flowering hybrid Odontoglossums now in
commerce, together with the beautiful yellow Oncidiums and scarlet
Odontiodas. Several useful winter-flowering Orchids are to be found in the
genus Zygopetalum, and Z. crnitum, Mackayi, Perrenoudii, and Gottianum
will now be throwing up their spikes of showy and long-lasting blossoms.
These Orchids are vigorous growers, and when developing their spikes are
greatly assisted by weak doses of liquid cow-manure every three or four
days. They will also need a good supply of water until the blooms fade,
when they should be kept somewhat drier for several weeks until ready for
repotting.

Having this year given cultural directions for an amateur’s Cool house,
I propose during the following season to describe the monthly work
necessary for the Cattleya house.

SUGGESTED ADDITION.

ZyYGocoLax CHARLESWORTHII.—This pretty bigeneric hybrid can be
procured at a reasonable price, and should be included in every Cool house,
as it is free-flowering and quickly develops into a specimen capable of
bearing several flower spikes. The blossoms are large, and are freely
produced during the winter months, and last three to four weeks in
perfection. The sepals and petals are rich chocolate brown on a white
ground, the large lip being white with a bright purple blotch covering the.
greater part. It is a hybrid between Colax jugosus and Zygopetalum
Perrenoudii, and of fairly recent raising. Two other members of this
genus are also worthy of inclusion, and bloom about the same period
namely :—

Zygocolax Amesianus (C. jugosus X Z. Mackayi).

Zygocolax Veitchianus (C. jugosus X Z. crinitum).

REVIEWS OF BOOKS.
Icones Orchidearum Austro-Africanarum extratropicarum, or figures, with
descriptions, of extra-tropical South African Orchids. By Harry Bolus,
F.L.S., Hon. D.Sc. (Cape), Vol. III., William Wesley & Son, 28, Essex
Street, Strand, London.

The second volume of this important work appeared in r1g11, shortly
after the death of the Author, and was reviewed at pp. 197-198 of our
nineteenth volume. It was then announced that a number of additional
plates had been prepared, which it was hoped to publish. This volume
marks the fulfilment of that promise, and has been prepared by Mrs.
H. M. L. Bolus, formerly Miss Kensit, B.Sc., and assistant to Dr. Bolus,
now Curator of the Bolus Herbarium at Cape Town. It contains one
hundred plates, with text, and is arranged like the preceding volume.

382 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913.

Thirty-six of the plates originally appeared in the author’s earlier Orchids of
the Cape Peninsula, published in 1888, now out of print, and nine are by Mr.
F. Bolus, a son of the author. It is intended to proceed with the drawing
of African Orchids, and materials are invited from those who have an
opportunity of collecting them. The work forms a valuable contribution
to Orchidology.

— Cattleyen und Lelien, Samenzucht und Pflege. Von Anton Hefka, k.u.k.
Hof-Obergartner in Schonbrun-Wien. Mit einem Gelietwort von Anton
‘Umlauft k.u.k. Hofgartendirector. Published by Wilhelm Frick, Vienna
and Leipzig.

We have received a copy of this interesting cultural treatise on the
Cattleya group, which should prove valuable to those conversant with
German. It contains 83 pages and 20 photographic figures, with an Index.
There are cultural directions, methods of hybridising and raising seedlings,
with a sketch of the various species, and other supplementary matters,
including a balance-sheet showing the satisfactory profit of 16 per cent. on
capital invested in growing cut blooms for market.

ORCHID NOTES AND NEWS.
AN ordinary meeting of the Royal Horticultural Society will be held at the
Royal Horticultural Hall, Vincent Square, Westminster, on December 2nd,
when the Orchid Committee will meet at the usual hour, 12 o’clock noon.

There will be no Show on December 16th, but the Orchid Committee
will sit upstairs, and only plants submitted for Certificates will be received.

The next meeting of the Manchester and North of England Orchid
Society will be held at the Coal Exchange, Manchester, on December 18th.
The Committee meets at noon, and the exhibits are open to inspection
from i to 4 o’clock p.m.

We have much pleasure in announcing that the Calendar of Operations
for next year will be contributed by Mr. T. W. Briscoe, late Orchid
foreman to Messrs. James Veitch & Sons at Langley, in succession to Mr.
John Seden, and previously in charge of the Orchid Department at Kew.
Mr. Briscoe’s long experience as hybridist in charge of Messrs. Veitch’s

important Orchid Department at Langley should be of value to the many
readers of the Orchid Review who are engaged in raising Orchids from seed,
a business which is every day gaining fresh adherents.

Mr. GeorGE Gorpon, V,M.H.—The Gardeners’ Magazine for November
22nd announces the retirement of Mr. George Gordon, V.M.H., from the
Editorship of that journal, a post which he has ably filled since the death
of Mr. Shirley Hibberd, in 18q0. The issue contains a portrait and an

DECEMBER, 1913] THE ORCHID REVIEW. 383

interesting biographical sketch of the late Editor. His successor is Mr.
Charles H. Curtis, who has long held the post of Assistant Editor.

R.H.S. ScrENTIFIC COMMITTEE.—The following reference to Orchids
exhibited at meetings of the Committee are taken from the official report
(continued from page 296) :—

November 4th :—

ORGANISMS IN AN ORCHID HOUSE.—Some curious seeds were referred to
the Committee by the Orchid Committee, to whom they had been sent as
insects which infested an Orchid house, without, however, any damage
being traceable to them. They were the seeds of some plant, probably an
Oxalis, which had been scattered by the plant over the house, and bore a
distinct resemblance to minute beetles without legs.

PELorIc CATTLEYA.—Mr. G. Wilson showed a peloric form of Cattleya
labiata alba, remarking that peloric forms of albinos were decidedly rare.

NOVEMBER 18th :—

CATASETUM MACROCARPUM.—Mr. R. A. Rolfe exhibited, from the
collection of Mr. G. Rae Fraser, Letchmore Heath, Herts., an inflorescence
of eight male flowers of Catasetum macrocarpum. Paraic flowers from
the same plant have been before the Committee on two occasions, in
October, 1910, and November, 1912. In the interval the plant has made
two futile attempts to flower, but this year it has produced the male
inflorescence above-mentioned. thus enabling the species to be certainly
identified. Both inflorescences are being preserved at Kew, and the plant
has now been presented to the collection, Mr. Fraser having another plant.

CYPRIPEDIUM INSIGNE WITH THREE LIPs.—Mr. Rolfe also exhibited,
from the collection of Mr. Albert Pam, Wormley Bury, Broxbourne, a
twin-flowered scape of Cypripedium insigne, in which the upper flower was
normal, but the lower had three lips, as in the well-known variety Oddity.
In this case the two lateral sepals are developed separately, and diverge
laterally, the dorsal sepal is reduced in breadth, and the petals are
metamorphosed into lips, which clasp the normal lip.

DENDROBIUM LEEANUM ATROPURPUREUM.—A fine form of Dendrobium
‘Leeanum was exhibited at the R.H.S. meeting held on November 18th last
by Messrs. Flory & Black, Orchid Nursery, Langley. It agrees well with
D. Leeanum atropurpureum, which received an Award of Merit from the
R.H.S. in October, 1900, when shown by the late Sir Frederick Wigan
(O.R., viii. p. 351), and which differs from the original form in its very dark
purple lip. D. Leeanum appears in importations of D. Phalaenopsis, and
is believed to be a natural hy brid between that species and D. superbiens.
Its history was given at p. 334 of our third volume.—R.A.R.

384 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [DECEMBER, 1913

THE ORCHID REVIEW.—The present issue completes the twenty-first
volume of the Orchid Review, and the succeeding one will mark its coming
of age. We believe the record of the work has been one of sustained
progress, and the numerous congratulations and good wishes for the future
which reached us on the completion of the twentieth volume afford a
gratifying assurance that the policy steadily followed throughout has been
widely appreciated. The Orchid Review has witnessed and recorded an
enormous advance in the cultivation, and especially in the hybridisation,
of Orchids, and the present issue announces what we believe will mark
another great development. The work will celebrate its twenty-first
birthday in a new dress, with improvements which we will not anticipate.
We rely on our numerous friends for their continued co-operation and
support in the future.

We regret that the promised Index to the first twenty volumes has
not yet appeared ; the matter, however, has been selected, and we hope to
report progress shortly.

ORCHID PORTRAITS.

ANGRAECUM RECURVUM.—Gard. Chron., 1913, li. p. 374, fig. 132; Gard.
Mag., 1913, p. 899, with fig.

CATTLEYA GRANIRIS.—Gard. Mag., 1913, p. 841, with fig.

CATTLEYA LABIATA.—Journ. Hort. , 1913, ll. p. 429, with fig.

CYPRIPEDIUM OLympus.—Gard. sata. £ -» 1913, p, 865, with fig.; Garden,
1913, p. 576, with fig.

HABENARIA IANTHA.—Gard. Chron. , 1913, ll. p. 300, fig. r10.

PHALZNOPSIS LUEDDEMANNIANA. Ee epee 1913, Pp. 557, 565,
with fig.

SACCOLABIUM GLOMERATUM.—Gard. Chron., 1913, ii. p. 317, fig. 116.

a
ANSWERS TO CORRESFONDENTS.
rchids are named - ings answered here so Aad a possible. Correspondents are
4g ated to give the native country or parentage of plants sent. An ADDRESSED postcard must be

sent reply by post is deinen (abroad, reply postcards Eahoula be used). Subjects of special
peein “will be dealt with in the body of the work]

G.L.—The Orchids sent for name are Pleurothallis hians, Lindl., Oncidium nubigenum,
Lindl., and Sigmatostalix radicans, Rchb. f.
F.D.—Catasetum macrocarpum, Rich.

E.R.—This hybrid between Cypripedium Sallieri Hyeanum and C. Thompsonii is a
form of C. are It is good in shape and colour

Th. P.— y thanks for the records, which shalt be duly incorporated. We hope to
receive others feta time to tim

B.—Cypripedium Pcubi Rchb. f.
C.P.—We will ascertain whether a copy can be obtained. It is a large work.
Photographs received, with thanks.—F.D.
Books recei iyed. —Bolus, Orchids of South Africa ;, Hefka, Cattleyen and Lzelien.

INDEX.

ADA aurantiaca, 298.

Adaptations, 168.

Adioda St.-Fuscien, 64, 102, 298.
Adoglossum rae 298, 319.

Aérides, 55; odoratum, 252; 0. album, 254 ;

Albinism, 15, 1

Alexander, a ee on Some _ Epiphytal
Orchids, 14; Orchids, Their Popularity
and Culture, 1o 07, 2

Amateur’s Collec ca 19, 44, 97, 118, 145,

_ _ 178, 203, 242, 294, 324, 343, 380.
Amateur’s Orchid house, 19.
oe 247 ; Andersonii 251; Arnol-
m, 120; Eichlerianum, 120, 255;
arcs, 2A 75 Serna, 369, 375-
» 204.

Anguloas
Answers to ee ee a0 gr aes ria
136, 168, 2 a seg Sill 328, 360, eh

Arts and as 146,
Arachnanthe Lowii, ped fa ey 58.
Arundina bam busifoiia, 379.

shton, Frank, Relief Fund, 52.

rie Pa 2 pip (X Phaius grandifolius),

; Wallisii, 154.
Bletilla byacinfhina ei 94.
Bolleas and allies
Books, Reviews pt
rise be iatges Orchidear um Austro-
Afric Book
Hefka, ‘Lollleven und L elien,
Botanical Congress, Fourth Ce
60.

Brassocatlelia Andre Maron, 87; Aurora,
ne ;

d oan,

92; King Emperor, 160, 196 ; Leonardi,

87; Me ma, 33; Triune, 374; Veitchii
The Dell var., 19

Brassocattleya amabilis Goodson’s var., 95 ;

= iftonii magnifica, 181; Dietrichiana,

elegans, 255. heatonensis Canary, 156;
lene, 345; Iris, 348; Joan, . 286;
langleyensis, 25, 26; Lindleyana, 52;
Menda, 96; Me ndelosa, 172; mirabilis,
Ea nivali is, 194; Pittiana, 337) Princess
Elizabet th, 187% Puritan, 372; Vilmori-
a Etna, 218 ;Wellesleyz., ree William

Pitt, 332.
Brassolzlia Gratrixiz pe Cattleya Octave
Doin), 140; Veitchii,
Briscoe, 43,
Brussels Botan ic Garden, 271
Bulbophy pi hisecen 303, 3223. Carini-
orum, 303; pscraaicnes, 303; con-
gestum, 250; Medus
Bull’s, nee 'Wm., Orchid Exhibition, 184.
Burbidge “9342s

|

|

Burke, Gavia, 342.

CALANTHE Dominyi, 338, 339; violacea,
n, 62.

251; Vulca
Galaneien a6: decidu ous,

85.
“eo pon of Operations, 26, 53, 83, 122, 148,
227, 257, 282, 314, 332, 365.

eRe on Mende - n Formula, 2

Catasetum, 329 ; Bangers: 277% ——

1; Colmaniz, 221, 252; Darwinian
330, (both sexes of), 329; mac Sceaveaes
(female - er), 39, 383; splendens
imperiale, 214.

Catasetums, 124; bee bine oat y 33,
females known, 330, (sca f),. 330
economy of fertilisation in, "3903 male “and
a os flowers, 330; sportive poses

Cattleya Abekenice, ae Acis, 350 ;
60 ; s (white), 214; nga
Glebe var., Agri eee ze (xX L.-c. callis-
n

Armstrongiz (xX pitolosind se
0, (X intricata), 286; auren

aurea, 304, (seedlings of), 140, 238, (X
Brassolzlia Veitchii), 31, (xX Lelio-
cattleya Gottoiana), 34; sone 245 5

Co gly Undine, 15; Em aah $ Fre-
derick var. alba, 218; E. via
Clifton, re : Enid var. F. Aes ek ary

Esther, 370; Fabia, 282, (x L.-c. callis-
toglossa), 210; F. alb 308 ; F. Prince of:

raised), 33, ( -c. Canhamiana), 226;
H. alba, 346 ‘ s. Wate tler,
9; Harrisoniana, 331, (crosses), 271
(x Schroederz), 271, - e
Woodhams), 322; H. alba Stanley’s var.,
Hic _ 3313 intermed a
Seep s of), 306. Mossize Wagener,
5 x ae yea wits yok ie pe

ieuas 158 : intricata (x L

288; Isidor, 377; labiata alba “Gelfed)
53 GC ,¢ iy belene

Peetersiana, ror ; Lawrenceana (X L

tenebrosa), 236; L. Mary-Regina, 217 ;

Leda, 96; BM 331; L. alba, 331 ;

Magnet, 131; Mantinii

ot
M. Dreadnought, 246; M Golden Reef,
o; M. Maho

t
L. anceps Schreederz), 130 ;
Little Gem, 95 ; picturata, 278 ;

386

Cattleya—
Pittiana Brassavola Digbyana),
32's ee 296 ; Portia ccerulea,
370; P. Wes irt var., 376; Prince
John, 318 ; ow. 3: §23 Raphaelic oan

& var. “61: oths childian Ws
George esa "288; Seem 46 ;
Sigind, 87; Skinneri (x Bowringiana),

Brassavola Digbya dost 3 a

214; Surprise, 349;
b

W.alba, 15; Warscewiczii, 181; W. alba,
14; W. Mandaiana, a Kew Zen obia, 24.
Cattleya house, new, at Kew, 72.
Cattlora, peloric, 383.
Cattleyas, 53, 123, 181, 228, 259, 283, 356,
367 ; in leaf mould, 270 ;__ seedling, 214,
06.

395, 3!
Cattleyas, albino, 305 ; we 306.

Cattleyas, yellow-flower

Ceratostylis himalaica, 1 4 z,

Chel: poate IOI, 290,-253.

Chester My). Ha 34o.

Chondropealum Fletcher <i, 33.
Chondrorhyncha Lipscombiz, 88, 250.
Chysis, 1 31; ‘ oe ctescens, 192.

Cirrhope campanulatum, 121, 272;

Micholtai ll, ey miniatum, 237, 251.
raw isostoma acuminatum, 2523 secundum,

Cochlioda (and its a a : ee
(xo M,

(as the pollen parent),
Warscewiczii), os Cx Ay hatter,
288, (xX O. Rolfeze), 116.

Cochliodas, 257.

Cecelia macrostachya, 280.

Coelias, 28.

Coelogyne sence, 335; brunnea, 334;
cristata, 29, 124, 316, 358; Cycnoches,
335; fimbri aa ‘3733 fuscescens, 334
(and its allies), 334; f. brunnea, 334 ;
integerrima, 171; mee 66, sy
macrobulbon, 335; ie, 302 pan-
durata, I 128, 142, oa : Rocheet ee

Ccelogynes,

Corya cee ce. 146.
ie tin neces Dinas, 287.
s, Charl a ey 383 3
Cyessches 124,
Cooperi, 63, onan, ne prime aaa
OL: Forgetii, 2553 pentadactylon, i ya
e of), 261.

; J. Davis, 93; Lad

eeoral hybri rid,
Conbidea 54,149, 179, 358.

INDEX,

Ls apo Alcinida, 63; Alma Gervaet,
237 ; Amazon, 64 ; arietinum, 82 . Artemis,
60; aekuse anum

bu
, 7 3 aureum virginale
Venus), 93; Beatrice, 33; eerie ek (and
its hybrids S), 353, 354 (cu of), 3535
Boltonii (with three- ‘Towered scape) 245;
B. magnificum, 353 ; broadoaksi
730); ts tn 31, 37; Calceolus {fotalieed
by bees), 248 ; nhamii, 21; Carola,
69 ; Chantecleer Hessle var., 133 ; Chap.

; Charles

mania, Canham,

concolor (x ext), 1 159, as “Godtioys)
9 Con 33; Constantine, 91;
ee ir, 625 eel re) ree (x

h,
icphiasen SA EVA, S45
api s I, ihe Fairrieanum (x

delicrissost ne 23 ‘rankeanum, 179,
roe gat e,60; G
glaucophyliam (nybrids of),
a ia (x Niobe,
Goliath, an : Gul
Hassall Hindeys var.,
593 aie with three ae saat 1.

IG ek re

Iona, 64; Jur 53 ward VII
(xX imsigne Harefield Hall var.). 38;
King Ferdinand, 97; Lady Carlile, 62;
Lady Dillon, 62; I agnificum, 68 ;
Lady Evelyn James, 62; Lato 32
Leeanum, 344; n, 375 » 80
Mary Gratrix, 37; M (xX insigne
Sanderz), 26 John Martendale

Gratrix, 7. :

G. Gues ty 1333 Mrs
Mrs. Harry Bruce, 7, 61;

Niobe- Leeanum, 320; Norah, 3493
Nydia, 33; Olympus, 372; Ophir, 94

ysses, 62; Vandyck, 92; Viking,
ce me a ee in uggeSipgpr a 320 ;
iene cone . Stevens, 69; Wellesley,
97 > oin ont Monae 132.

Loot reversions, 2

Cypripediums, 28, 44, 97, 182 , 367: ; Chinese,
80 ; seedling, 215.

INDEX.

Davidson Cup, 217.

Davis, ter, 341,

Delanghe Vervaene’s Nursery, 269; leaf-
mould culture in, 271.

Dendrobium amethystoglossum, 52 ; bigib-
bum Lady Colman, 128 ; Hho
(x Ainsworthii), 162 ; cu i

Dearei McBean’s var., 25 Fa coneri,
194; rie 102); Ral ct Sn 237 ;
I thurnii, 250; Leeanum; 383; L. a

purpureum s ngley var. 376;
linguiforme, 152; microglaphys, 301;
nobile nia , 1343 n. virginale

£27 9° thyr pais Galliceanum, 193;
Victoria-Regina,
Dendrobiums, 29, 54 OO; (122,220, .262 5

Diacrium bicornutum (x Lelia purpurata),
ee

k, J. Harrison, 359.

Dipedam ictum, 272.
isa grandiflo 3 seed), 245; uniflora
colareae ns But waged 292, (fruit of),
, (pollination of), 2
Dominy, John

S 348:
Downton, George, 340.
Drainage, 206.!

ENDRES, A. R., 341.
S rnity of 1912, 5.

Epidendrum ambiguum, 215; ciliare (x
Lelia cinnabarina). 103; congestum,
251; elongatum, 146, 147; Endresii, 48;
fulgens, 146, 147; kewense,167, (X
evectum), 167, oe xanthinum), 167;

leucochilum, 193 ; organense, 223; radi-
(X

cans, 333, Bletia Shepherdii), 3335
Schomburgkii (x radicans), 111 ; Veitchii
Endresii‘, 48 ; xanthinum, 146, 147.
Epidendrums, nt’s Nests, 146
Epilzlia macro-cinnabar, 159.
Pils Veitchii, 84.
Epiphytes
Eria ri tailicidins 121 ; trilamellata, 251.
Eulophia paniculata, 231.
Eulophiella Elisabethze, 121 Ie7e 150

pager 189, 237; Peetersiana, 105,
7:

Evoi ution of new characters, 16.
Exposition, Anglo-American, 360.

FERTILISATION, 333.
Flory and Black, Langley Orchid Nursery,
3» 359-

Fowler, J. Gurney, 359.

GENETICS,
Ghent astmetisal a tad 105,
135. 162, 186; Summer Exhibiti at
Ghent, 199, 233, 309
omesa recurv:

387

Gongora K phrepass 280; leucochila,
Tracyan

Gordon, God. V.M.H,, 382.

Govenia lagenophora, 32 .

Grammangis Ellisii, 246.

TI;

HABENARIA obtusata, 263; rhodochila, 255 ;
39, 63. 64.

52.
He sture, wonders of, 44.
Hemipilia calophylla, 231.
Heredity,

50.
Hexadesmia micrantha, 235.
Ble oe George, Gift of Orchids to
203.
Holland pene Show, 234, 243.
Hurst, Application of Genetics to Orchid
Breedin ng, 13

» 349.
50) phi Australian, 153; characters

of, 168, (blen Mitel g (incompatability
of), 168, (mosaic), 168, (separation of),
7; “False,” 333 ; names of, a Pa imary,
21; records of (imperfect), 362 ; Register
of, ; productive cells of, 168;
Reversion of, 16 ; Secondary, 168,
agar ssi name of, 22, 23, 43 ; T' :
23; Trigeneric, 5; of unrecorded parentage,
TAS TS ' seheob in, 167 ; varietal names
of,

VANSON, G., 103.

KEFERSTEINIA graminea, 179.
oe Guillerme, 341.
Kench, C., 116.

Kramer, Car » 340.
Kew. Orchids at, 179, 231, 280, 325, 364,
(dam aged), 73; Gift of Orchids to, 106,

263 5 Se ee at, 105, 106 ; Tea Ki osk
burnt down,
Kew Orchid ‘Pane Outrage, 135.

LALIA era 28, 258; a. aE —
65: y(643

iensis, Ro eblingi

brosa eya ems nd elii), aor’
Cowanii (x Caceres Trianz), 95 ; Gou le
— 308 ; Iona

jJongheana (x C. Parthenia), 288
Tati, 231, . L.-c. Dominiana), 245:
Lundii, 166 ; nophylla, 326; pumila
(x tshasauleya, "O phir), 39; purpurata

(as a parent), 211; 5 senebrosa (x Schom
eae cyanea
Leelias, 228.
Leioeattleya Adolph- ae ‘ol ; Alphand, 87 ;
anda, 194; A OSO, 47 ; Amec ecia,

pon ; Paks, 318 ; gf Hee splendens,
; ; Armstrongiz Orchid-

C._Warneri), é: Digbyano-Mossiz, 21 ;

388 INDEX.

Lzliocattleya—
Digbyano-Schreedere, sae Diogenes, 99:
Dominiana, 210; D. uthfield var., 158;

Doris (xX Cattleya Schroeder 155;
Dorothy, 91 ; Duchess of ag page 197 ;

Burfor
191; Feronia Charlesworth’s var., 376;
Firminii ardens, 67 ; Fournieri (x callis-
age 995 Fre ak, Sil 212) 221,7225,
ie it H olford’s var., 219;

eg “Woodha 316) OX Cattleya
Rothschildiana), ap By Cladiators<°57;;
loriosa, 225; Golden Oriole va

221; Lowii, 99; lu (x C. Trianz)
130; 1. Holford’s var., : 18;
Maqueda, 346; Marquis de Wavrin Orchid-
hurst var., 289; Mauretania, 375; rs.

Donald MacMaster, a ; M.D. M.Orchid-
hurst var., ot ; Muriel, 31; Myra (white),
214, (X sa), 318 ; beet an 3493
Olenus Tia exit War.) 372° am, 375;
Perdita, 288; Philip Stokes, ae Phoenix
var. King George, 287; Promenza, 135,

ueen a 278; Rainbow, 318

b 332
Sehihirats: 372; Sandhurstiana, 347;
Saturn, 350; Schillieriana (L.-c. elegans),
278; (xX C. Mossiz), 194; Scylla,

Taurus, 375; Thyone, 350; Trimyra, 95;
Tyresias, 364 ; Urania, 287 ; Valeria, 94;

7
Lzliocattleyas, 270; leaf mould, 116,
Light, importance of, 14, 205
Lindley’s Herbarium, 275; types, 275, 325;
or
Linnean ptosih 299.
Liparis lacerata, 296 ; nana, 251.
Lissochilus sreptopetals, 194.
Listrostachys, 24
Lobb, Thomas, es
Lobb, William, 337-
Low, Stuart, & Co., removed to Jarvisbrook,
359-

Lowiara insignis,

_ Lycaste a 338 ; Imschootiana, 223;
Skinn

ccs, i

MANCHESTER and North of England Orchid,
36, 67, 96, 131, 160. eet 225, 289, 323,
351, 376; Competiti 199,: 2253 2295 3
a: — teed. 352.

Manures. use o
— MsCh., fg citids raised by, +f:

Masdevallia coccinea Harryana, 340 ;
Harryana alba, 312; Lowii, 277; tri-
dactylites, 180; Veitchiana, 341.

Masdevallias,

Maxillaria Fletcheriana, 160.

Maxillarias, 125.

Megaclinium Bufo, 121 ; eburneum, I21.
peepee characters (heritable), 50, (mixed),
50, colour factors, 16, (latent), 15, I

Saas ee 279; ormulze, (simplification
of), 279; segregation, 279 ; symbols, ms ;
ong ology (conclusions based on), 27
terms, 50, (double beg Jo (half ae
77; (single dose), 77; u it-characters, 10,
119, 147, (c noteriat origin of ), i
constancy of), 119, (presence and absence

of), 279.
Mendelism, basisof, 147 ; definition of, Io.
Mendelize, 147.
Microstylis ae lana 7.
Miltonia ashlandensis, 378; Bleuana, 213,
267, (self-fe rtilised), 214, (x vexillaria G,
wen), 213, (X vexillaria Paps”)
267, 268; B. Pe etersiz, 215;
ar 2675 ; owt ebia ag 218, or ay :
rs. Ralli, 255: Endresii, 341; Hyeana
ere 244; H. gracilis, Saas H
oez

x ; alba, 254

Sanderz, 256% spectabils, 327.
(x. One ‘art. £38.20 St (x
Roezlii),. 306 ; vexillaria tybrids ri ext
365, (x O.. exispum), 103, 6X
Leopoldii), 215; v. cme Oe
v. memoria G. D. Owen), 140; La
a 244 5 v. Lyoth preg v. Stott ke,

rginale, 220 Warcewiczii

x O. Bawendi 306.

Miitonias, 28, 54, 182, 259, 365; seedling,

239:
Miltonioda Ajax, 52; Cooperi, 232, me
06; Harwoodii Fowets var., 24
Moss’ s vat, 114, 128; H. Shrubbery var.,

379.
Miltoniodas, 258.
Monachanthus, 329 ; ee 3% 329, 330.
Monton Grange collectio
— pollinating Orchids, 263.

yanthus, 329
ie ccrikon 247; gracillimum, 252.
gyrene — of, 22, 23; correct, 235

prs or ee Sed, 21, 23, 24; of sae
words, 267; to - Bar| or modified,
22 ; vernacular, 21, 23.

Nature as an Orchid grower, 265.

New York National Show, 195.

Nomenclature, 234, 266; Beene Rules,
2%, 23 5 confusion in, 21, 24, 42 ; contra
to rule, 22 ; Echoes of a oaiteat ‘tecasion,
Zi; “tow plants are named,” 266;

INDEX.

Nomenclature—

Law of priority, 299 ; no names at all, 234 ;

of Hybrids, 21, 42, 362 ; of Orchids, 42 ;
R.H. plies to sueties pe ; oa
rules, 22; rules of, 21-24, 42,

North of England Harscatural, “s 3.

OBITUARY—William Bull, 303; William
Holmes, 295; Adolphus Henry Kent, ah A.,
302; John Snow Moss, 301; Gust. H.
Miiller-Abeken, 99; Julius Roehrs, ae
Odontioda Adrastus, Ber Aspasia,
oS oa Z10; ushing Bride,
ala) § ads hawize, re ers Lid; 131.230,
tis "306 360, (X O. crispum Mossiz), 114,
Ob) 77+ Db. mere Vv

(scarlet forms of), son’s a
fia Fae of Orange, 114; Brewii
Brindejonc des eoniinis

246, he 347 ;
235,252; Brunette, 347; Cecilia :
C. Orchidhurst var.,
F (x ‘0. crispo-Harryanum), I1
, Pescatorei),
2193)" 6 soi rina
ooksoniz Fowler
Vary, 22
venustum,
Cupid, 306;

253; > crisp
daltonense,

; Mine dhs)

Riding Hood, 129; Royal G
Sandere, 193; Sch roederi, I 323 Schroeder-

288 ; S.
Purple Empress, 253; Vuylstekex, 239,
(x C. Neetzliana), 269, (secondary
hybrids of), 77 ; Wilsonii The President,
246.

Cdseitinals X Odontoglossum, 116.
gery ‘gee ae ; reversion in, 239;

eeds,
Gdontodsas I 38, Neg 242, 2 57.
Odontocidium oo 189.
Odontoglossum Acm Adrianz, 236 ;
(X Pescatorei), 116 ; AL gra andiflorum, 114;
any 230 gigantea,
orth Orchid Dene var, 222 ; A. Good-
as var., 67; ; amabile F airlight, 10>; A;
amandum, 93; Amethyst
Anaphe, 31;
Andersonianum, 2 Antiope var.
Reseda, 91; 2 Cevdluewas Ss, 9, (x
aus 306 ; a. , 93 ; ashteadense,
Aur 197 3
eadices, 244 ; Calypso. ass
g1; cirrhosum (X Harryanum), 3097;

389

a
osmum, 125, 231, 358; Cleopatra,
ak Clytie;) <213,° 4x crispum), 286 ;
Cloth of old, 133; Cooksonii (xX
olfez), 371 oradinei, 193, (raised
senibenty), 175 ; Crawshayanum super-
m, 348; - Harryanum, :

131; ‘Dell Sunrise,
m8 c peas Spb 8, * 10 ;c. Kench
rd_ Perfe OA 1323 1G
raeian (x Wise 238; c. Lucie-
Mariz, 290; c. Madou ino 269, (
c. Marize), 269; c. Marie (x c. Luciani),
269; c. Mossie, 113 , 114, 302 ; c. Prince
Mary, 176; Roberts, basin 264; C
Rossendale, (13 -¢. Souverin, 215 5
ste (asa parent), eB c. xanthotes

onbirt var., 3733; C. x. Yellow bird,
155.3

363,
5 harven secnnaies delicatum,
ia 192;

irt var.,

379; maculatum
(x Uroskinneri), 116,

116,115; Mari tan itis
307 ; Meni ter, 3743 Meredithiz,
mirificum (Xx he age ais ), 116;
m (* ce rigpum),

Hallii),
Odontioda ee Istekeze), 239; P. Lady
ord, 160; P. Sander.

Var. 1
Gatton, 218°:
ense), 156, (X Pescascineal 307 ;

363; Rossii, 13 (Spec tabile), 245;
Saturne, 126, 167, 221; Schliepe:
363; scintillans Orchid Dene rig ae

39°
Scottianum, 139 ; Smithii, 62 ; spectabile,
Bat sb aced 306 ; " triumphans
latisepalum trum), ae ; ue

; triumphosum, 156
ford Gem, 126, 320; U

of), 185, (x C. Neetzliana), 116; Valeria
Glebe var., 155; Vesta, 244; vexillarium,

» 363: Vivien, 351; Vuylstekez (x
sanguinea), 156; ilckeanum x
Edwardii), 114, as ; Wilsonii, 318;

Odontoglossum steed structure of, 112.
Odontoglossum seeds, to oe II
Odontoglossums, 28, 41, 150, 229, 315;
— ed, 249; miedioe 140 ; for market,
rom Rosslyn, : hybrids, 239,
tae 306, (blotched), 238, (secondary), 238,
239; reversi 238; seedling, 112,
* 206, 213, 239, 306
eedling house, 115; variation
among, I Pea
Odontonia brugensis, 180, 213, 231, 306; b.
Distinction, 346.5 Eileen, 289 ; Chol-
ag til, 177, 30 ; Cybele, 127, 167 ; decora,
: 196, 203 > Farnesiana, 288 ;

lla, 224; cinnabarina,
ce 93, 167; C. Ashlands’
161; C, illustris, 219; Ralli’s
128; Marjorie, 31, 39-
Oncidiodas » 258.
Oncidium ‘altisstannk,
2 ast ee a pi arta
89; coryn Eoces
321, 323; Aapbridicte. 18: { erdiaiariaeh,
ianum, 173;

: :
leaf mouid), 268, 271; tigrinum, 344;
aricosum Westonbirt var., 351 ; Warneri,

147 « bidentatum,

Oncidium and Odontoglossum, 363.
Oncidiums, 54, :. ts 230, 284; of the
Cyrtochilum section, 1

50, (
Builders, 2653

) 108,
(in the ast” 107 ; ions (atmosphere of),
204, (seedling), 237; (destruc icon of, at
Kew), 106; nce of),
154; new, 2 ae Ft,

101, ne 166, 199, 232, 263, 295, a, 359,
382; 266.

Orchid , aaa 1, oe 3 ty ate Index
of, 384; portrait of the Edito

INDEX.

Orchid Stud-Book, 22, 23, 24, 49, 2

Orchids albino, Lene aot
tion, 51 ‘an atrocity,”
261; at Bruges, 305;
267, 269; at Ewhurst,

ai M see

233, (en prnos number
of), 297, Gepiauation of), 29
ing, 342; im

1 99, 134, hss, 198, 231,
3323 leaf-mould for,

of, 205 of, 71, (to
Este 237; Sale of Ean seedlings),
4, (Sir 305,

od

tach AEs Chevalliriana 2 35.

Orchis Braunii, tos 202 ; foli a (x ma
a 2

racteata, 103;

la, 263.

Ornithidium Sophronitis, 289.

Osmunda fibre, 205.

Our Note Book, 41, 73, 105, 233, 265, 297.

PAPHINIA CRISTATA, 253.

Parthenogenesis, 112, 333.

Pearce, Richard, 340.

Peeters et Fils’ Hsiablishwosat 9 267.

igor rea yess ( x Bletia Shep-
dii ’ ee

ie 138, a (and simulans), 105.
Phalznopsis, 86, 260, 357, , (compost
for), 268 ; amabilis snort 268, ve a.

atanthera aie 280,
| Pleiones, 259, 356.

INDEX. 391

Pleurothallis sera 180; repens, 250.
dye ad stimulas of, 3

olypodium fibre, 205.

Poysachy repens, 250.
ORTRAITS—ANGRCUM sree 136
recurvum, 384; quipedale, 72.
BRASSOCATILEYA iia 136; "Veitchii
the Dell var.,136.—Br ASSOLALIA R dolph-
lana, 104. — BULB OPHYLLUM edusze

328.—CATASETUM microgiossum, 328.—
Gietava A. Dimmock, 168; Adula

.

Glebe var., 360; Dowiana, 232; Dupre-
ana The Dell var., 40; Fa ia, 72; Gas-
kelliana alba, 360 ; Graniris, 384 ; ole

alba, 360 ; Harrisonize, 23253
384; Lawrenceana, 328; Me acti cto
Alexandra, 328 ; Mossiz, 296, 360 ; Tityus
Fr, (20 lane 36 ; af bs

wastes Warscewiczii, 296; Zephyra, 200.

—CEL YNE cristata, 104; intermedia,
72 si ndurata, 168. — CYMBIDIUM
Se ee Lowianum, 264; J. Davis, 104;

Lowianum, 104, 168; Schlegelii, 200.

Idina, 104; Iona, 72; Latona, 40;
aches 384 5 hase vag 360; Round-
168, Viking, 40.—DENDRO-

te Beek McBean’s we 328 ;

Andersonii, 40.— MEGACLINUM triste,
136.—MILTONIA Sander 264; vexillaria
virginale, 232.—ODONTIODA Bradshawie,
00 ; bru

232 + ama 200; crispu m
The Baroness, prt ‘aes. of India,
m

Queen Alexandra var. heodora, 296 ;
Thais, D IA Firminii,
Lelia Sander,: 200. ee cheiro.
phorum, 104 ; Lanceanum, 360; sphace-
aya 232: PAL ANGOE intermedia
40 ; ueddemanniana, 384;
e hulesen. 2c0. — SkGCOLaHE e glomer-
atum, 384.—SOPHRO- L#LIO-CATTLEYA
Thisbe, — SOPHRONITIS grandiflora,
104.—ST PEA convoluta, —

o
Sanderiana, 328. — VANILLA planifolia,
360.

- Pseudobulbs, 109.

. we
(ot SARE 2 Da ee Rae SG As een =

REICHENBACH, Prof. H. G., 273, 299;
death of, 273; Gold Medal presented to,
300; “Index Reichenbachianus,” 27
po 300; Will of, 274; Work of,

Se

Ravine: coccinea, 280 Im mschootiana,
234, 268, 285°; “ Rikehocd ina: Y 23a.

Ritaia himaliaca 175.

Rolfe, R. A, Hon our for, 200; Orchids of
the Flora spate 143); Recorder of
R.H.S. Hybrid Orchid Register, 361.

Romance of the Nurses of New Flowers,

2 _
Romance of Orchid Hunting By eae ga te

Royal Horticultural Society, - 59, 91, 126,
70 ;

154, 191, 217, 252, 285, 317, 346 379 5
A Show, 41, 42, fas Conference),
102 ene Show, 169; Epidiasc
102; Fortnightly Shows, 234; Hybrid
Orchid Register, 297, 361 o 30 5 Orchid
Conference, -102; No lature Com-
yoke 21,¢23)5 ‘Orchid Certificates, 42's
id Committee, 78; Scientific Com-

™ ittee, 102, I

»3
Royal International "Horticultural Exhi-

bition

ite eae

Sander & Sons, Bruges, 305.

Schomboleelia, 254.

ee Thomsoniana, 262 ; T.albo-
hag

ben settee 247 ; fragrans, 231, 268.
S, 55-

ea, 262; T. minor, 262; Wallisii,

bodes, Joh

Selenipedium ES 4s

Selenocypripedium seems g Tl, 79-

epee 5 122 5 and water for, 242
18.

242 tiffany for, 1

‘Git maatomele, radicans, e027 3:
Sobralia macrantha alba, 220; Veitchii,
280.

oo ere: 34; Electryon, 65 ;
sas 351 5

» 3733; pumeximia,
hy 2533 Thisbe 59; Venus, 224,

Sid
Sophrocattleya Saxa Orchid Dene var., 67 ;
s, 60.

stfieldien

hophnictin poe 128.

Sunra

Sophro- Lalio-Catleya Carna, 24.
28.

_ Sophronitis grandiflor

Spathoglottis, 29, 124 ; ae BI.
Species, 56.

Specific character, epg of, 168.
Sphagnum Moss, g

Spot-diseases, 365.

opea costaricensis, 299.

Stauropsis lissochiloides, 308.
Stelis barbata, 251.
Ste:

enoglottis longifolia, 364.

Suffragettes at Kew, 73, 74.

oes | INDEX.

THUNIAS, 316.

Thwaites, R. G., Albinism in Orchids, 15.
oads in Orchid houses, 305.

Tobacco stalks, 269,

Trichopilia Gouldii, 32:

Trichopilias, 317.

VANDA CG@RULEA, 14, 268,285 ; c. albidula,
zi c. albocceru oa c: Peet tersiana,
c ere, 12, 33.
Vanidas 316; 368 in ‘the Shan States, 12.
Vanilla planifolia variegata,

3H!
teh, Sir Hatry’ J., 336 ; (retirement of),
So

A ; Jame Ae & Ss
336; John Gould, 340; Peter C. M.,
Veitch Hortus Vettchti, 343 ; Monash “of

Orchidaceous Plants, 302, 343.
Ventilation, 26, 204 ; importance of, 14.

WALLICHIAN So ale 299, 325.

Mage Gustave, 341.

Watering, 27, pa 271, 315, in winter, 20,
aE

Wilson, E. H., 342.

XYLOBIUM ELATUM, 308.

YORK Floral Fete and Gala, 226.

ZAHN, GOTTLIEB, 340.

; X Odonto-

glossum (fourth generation), 111, 112.

ce ae ei; um os rewii, 222 ; Mackay 33 Js

O. ispum), If, 112, 33 x

Croke LED: masiliaae
Sanderianum, 319.

Zygopetalums, 149, 366.

319; m.

LISI: OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Angraecum cca rmailongasag L - 120 | Odontoglossum crispum Mossiz
Angrzcum recurvum 369 | Odontoglossum a ms var. Princess
Beat irarsiegsi langleyen sis Ma: 176
Calanthe siomerae: the first hybrid Odont toglossum crispum Robertsii 208, 264
Orchid 339 | Odontoglossum Dori ‘ =: S49
Cattleya Do owiana au : 304 |: Od apes ero Elfri ‘cla 185
Cattleya Fabia var. hone . 281 |. Odontoglossu oe of India 216
Cattleya La a Mary-Regina . 217 | Odontoglossum exin 249
Chondrorhyncha Lipscombiz eh § Odontoglossum eximium m Clarkii, 209
Cirrhopetalu nulatum 121 |. Od ontoglossum exultans. 249
Cycnoches pentada idin 17 | Odontoglossum Fascinator 249
ripedium Boltonii with a three - _ | Od Lattoeeaey Georgius-Rex 174
owered : 345 he lontoglossum sstissimam x
Cypripedium luteum 80 rispum ee
Cypripedium Roundhead 157 Odontoglossim Jas 115
Cypripedium tibeticu ‘ 8 ontoglos percultum,v varieties of 8
Cypripedium Viking a aes ROR eae Odoatoglobedil Pescato orei
Dendrobium Hee ea 152 Fi iat sPiece
Epidendrum Endresii 48 Odontoglossums, : Sate 3 ed — rid
Editor, portrait of the 4 | Odontonia Chollet
Lzeliocattleya Gladiator 57 |’ Oncidium chemeee wean Suites = ook oe
Miltonia Charlesworthii 313 | Oncidium corynephorum ii gar
Miltonia Sanderz : ‘ 2 “| 256 | Orchid Review, we “pod volumes . -
Odonti Bradshawiz Cookson’s var. 76 | Phaius tuberculos
Odontoglossum nprcdaleanes meth Reicoenbeicky Prof. H. Ce, portrait of 73
Baer toglossum crispum Franz Mase- Rolfe, Mr. R. A. , portrait t of .
Veitch, Sir Harry J., portrait of . 5 aoe

Odontuglossam ‘ctispum, f

blotched

¥ ae
eage
ie
waht