Skip to main content

Full text of "Municipal mediation plans"

See other formats





331. i 
v\o. \- 2.5 



Mediation Plans 



has as a major responsibility "to inquire faithfully, honestly, and im- 
partially into labor-management problems of all types, and secure facts 
which will lay the foundations for future progress in the whole field 
of labor relations." Report of Board of Trustees, March 9, 1946, 
page 1031. 

Phillips Bradley Milton Derber 

Director Research Co-ordinator 

Ralph Norton 

Research bv Lucille Brown 


Volume 45; Number 16; October 29, 1947. Published every live days by the University of 
Illinois. Entered as second-class matter at the post office at Urbana, Illinois, under the Act 
of August 24, 1912. Office of Publication, 358 Administration Building, Urbana, Illinois. 
Acceptance for maihng at the special rate of postage provided for in Section 110.^, Act of 
October 3, l')17, authorized July 31, 1918. 


Recent interest in mediation of labor disputes has Ijeen shown at 
all levels of government — federal, state, and municipal. This inter- 
est was given additional impetus when the War Labor Board was 
dissolved at the close of the war and at the same time the number 
and severity of labor disputes was increasing. 

In addition to its regular functions, the U. S. Conciliation Serv- 
ice had shown signs of interest in local and area plans for settling 
labor disputes. A report issued by the American Municipal Associa- 
' tion in Alay, 1947, describes one of these local plans as follows: 

Possibility of future widespread establishment under Federal auspices 
of industrial relations groups similar to the labor-management committees 
provided for by the 'Toledo Plan' is indicated by the creation in late Decem- 
ber, 1946, of a 'Labor-Management Assembly' in Philadelphia under the 
sponsorship of the U. S. Department of Labor. Composed of 22 representa- 
tives of labor, management, and the public, this 'assembly' was set up 
under the supervision of the director of the U. S. Conciliation Service, an 
arm of the Labor Department, and assigned the following functions: 

(1) To review the work of the U. S. Conciliation Service's Philadelphia 
branch office, checking especially the effectiveness of its mediation efforts 
and the impartiality of its conciliations; 

(2) To assist in the mediation of disputes which threaten to disrupt the 
industry or the economy of the area ; and 

(3) To refer such disputes to a 'peace panel,' a subcommittee of the 
"assembly," having an equal number of labor and management representa- 
tives, with the panel attempting to settle the differences but without making 
any findings or public recommendations. 

The extension of conciliation services along regional lines is 
now- in the hands of the newly created Federal Mediation and Con- 
ciliation Service. This agency was set up by the Labor Management 
Relations Act, 1947, to replace the U. S. Conciliation Service and 
is independent of the Department of Labor. 

Among the states. New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, 
Michigan, and Illinois, have functioning mediation and conciliation 

Interest in municipal mediation has been translated into action 
and working plans in only a few cases, including Toledo, Louisville, 
Boston, and New York, among others. The usual practice in cities 
where such plans do not exist is for the Mayor to take action only 
when the "labor sittiation" so obviously threatens the public interest 


as to create serious difficulty in the community. This has been 
described as crisis action and does nothing in the way of removing 
the causes of labor disputes. 

This Bulletin is limited to the consideration of two questions: 
First, what general and specific operational problems are encoun- 
tered by any municipal mediation agency ? Second, under what con- 
ditions should this type of mediation facility be extended to other 
cities, and with what modifications ? Since analysis must wait upon 
description, some idea of the workings of these plans will be given 
before proceeding to analyze their difficulties. 

Toledo Agencies Past and Present 

Any discussion of municipal labor plans must begin with Toledo, 
the trail blazer in municipal mediation. 

A series of disastrous strikes, threatening to disrupt the indus- 
trial life of the community, resulted in the original Toledo Industrial 
Peace Board. The Board was inaugurated in 1935 with the aid of 
Edward F. McGrady, then Assistant U. S. Secretary of Labor. The 
Board as it was finally constituted was made up of 18 members — 
five management, five labor, and eight public representatives. The 
key to the successful operation of the Board was its director, 
Edmund Ruffin, a former newspaper reporter, who maintained 
direct and vital contact with the parties involved in any controversy. 
He called upon Board members only in those cases proving impos- 
sible of direct and immediate settlement by him and was largely 
responsible for the success of the Board. There was no established 
procedure and no compulsion to use the Board or to abide by its 
suggestions. The only pressure was that exercised by the local news- 
papers, which consistently emphasized the public interest in the 
peaceful settlement of disputes. 

Board Policies. The policies of the Board drawn up by 
McGrady to insure its successful operation were quoted in the 
Toledo City Journal of January 22, 1938 as follows: 

1. The Board will never at any time have authority to order anyone to 
do anything. 

2. Co-operation between labor, management and the Board will be 
entirely voluntary. 


3. Members of the Board will represent the conimunity at larj^e rather 
than an}' faction or group. 

4. The Board shall merely mediate, which is to say make recommenda- 
tions or suggestions, which ma\- be mutually approved or rejected. 

5. The Board shall never arbitrate, which is to say it shall not, even by 
mutual request, make "binding" or "final" decisions which both sides must 
accei)t. These might lead to loss of confidence in the Board no matter how 
fair the decisions. 

6. The Board will never take a vote on the rightness or wrongness of 
the issues in a dispute. No judge or jury attitude will ever be displayed. 

7. The Board will operate with an irreducible minimum of publicity. 

8. The Board will not interfere with or assist in union organization 

9. The Board will take no positions on such questions as "open shop" 
or "closed shop." 

.\lth(jugh operating on a small scale, the Board handled success- 
fully over 100 major and minor disputes. The substantial reduction 
in the amount (^f labor conflict in Toledo won national fame and 
gradttally other cities facing the same problems took notice of it, 
sent observers, and adopted similar plans. 

During the war the functions of the Toledo Industrial Peace 
lUjard were gradually assumed by the National War Labor Board 
and other wartime government agencies. As a result, the Board was 
disbanded in 1943. 

In 1945 as the war's end seemed imminent, it was decided to 
appoint a committee to study labor-management relations in Toledo; 
If conditions warranted, machiner}- was to l)e set up to prevent and 
settle fitture labor conflict. 

Postwar Committee. After many meetings and discitssions, 
the committee drew up an Industrial Relations Charter enumerating 
the principles upon which operation of any mediation group would 
be based. The principles entimerated in the charter included the 

1. That management and labor each recognize and respect the preroga- 
tives and responsibilities of the other. 

2. That there be made available for voluntary utilizati(Mi, mediation, 
fact-finding and arbitration facilities. 

v3. That an educational program to promote better understanding be- 
tween management and labor be imdertaken. 


This Charter contained also the structural framework of a proposed 
Labor-Management-Citizens Committee and was adopted by the 
planning committee in November of 1945. In February, 1946, a city 
ordinance was passed establishing a permanent LMC Committee 
and incorporating the Charter into law. By June of that year a per- 
manent office was opened and a full-time Executive Secretary ap- 
pointed. The members of the original investigating committee were 
appointed to the permanent LMC Committee. 

The LMC is made up of 18 members receiving no salary for 
their work — six each from labor, management and the public — 
appointed by the Mayor for one year. The purpose of this Commit- 
tee, as stated in its enabling ordinance, is that it should act as 
". . . the directing body for the purpose of implementing and 
effectuating the purposes and principle of the Charter . . ." 

Dispute Procedure. When a dispute arises or threatens and 
the services of the LMC are desired, the case is first referred to 
the office of the Executive Secretary. The Secretary may attempt 
to settle the matter personally, but if the dispute is too serious or 
too complex to be settled at this level and mediation by the panel 
is desired, preliminary interviews are held with the parties con- 
cerned. The Secretary then draws up a statement of the issues in- 
volved in the dispute, including the position taken by each party, 
and submits it to a tri-partite panel selected by the Chairman to 
mediate the case. 

If the panel is unsuccessful in settling the dispute, it may refer 
the dispute to the full committee. The LMC may, at its discretion, 
choose to sit in on the case, but ordinarily will do so only in disputes 
proving considerably detrimental to the public welfare or hopeless 
of settlement elsewhere. 

In addition to its mediation work, the LMC has done some arbi- 
tration. As of April, 1947, four cases had been handled. This 
activity is in distinct opposition to the policies of the former Toledo 
Peace Board and to those principles generally accepted by authori- 
ties on mediation. To cope with the problem of arbitration, it was 
decided in February, 1947, to draw up a list of arbitrators for those 
desiring this service. In addition to this, having found that the full 
18-man committee could not effectively handle arbitration cases, the 
Committee provided that arbitration proceedings be handled by 


panels or bv single arbitrators. As a result, either the piibhc mem- 
bers of the LMC serve as arbitrators or the Committee arranges for 
other competent men to serve, as individuals or as panels of three. 

First Year Record. By the end of its first year of full opera- 
tion, July 1, 1947. the Committee had handled 78 local labor dis- 
putes. Twenty-two of these were strikes, of which the Committee 
settled 14 and gave minor assistance in eight. The Committee helped 
avert work stoppages in 39 other disputes which had reached the 
strike stage. 

In the first half of 1947, man-days lost from local strikes ap- 
proximated 13,500, as opposed to 56,060 man-days lost in the first 
six months of 1946. The decline was approximately the same as 
for the country as a whole. 

During the period from October, 1946 to March, 1947. there 
were no strikes. This halcyon period was brought to an end in the 
latter month with the eruption of three strikes, only one of which, 
as a local dispute, could be handled by the LMC. It was settled in 
four and one-half days. 

Boston's Industrial Relations Council 

In 1941. a number of important business and labor leaders set 
up the Industrial Relations Council of Metropolitan Boston.* Their 
purpose, as stated in a pamphlet, "The Boston Story," issued by the 
Council on October 1, 1946, was to promote "better understanding 
and the solution of labor problems through continuous and closer 
personal contact and accjuaintance among the representatives of 
these two groups." The Council is basically bi-partisan in character. 
Each of its major committees — Executive, Conciliation, and Advis- 
ory — includes an equal number of union and company representa- 
tives. The Executive Committee includes, in addition, one public 

When disputes arise, participants may apply to the Council for 
help in settlement. Three Chairmen of the Conciliation Committee 

* Another agency was created on March 5. 1947. This was intended to handle 
the grievances of employees of the city of Boston. This committee recently 
had its membership increased from six to nine, and now includes three officers 
from Boston's municipal staff, and three men each from the AFL and the CIO. 
Grievances are handled in all cases by the three city officers and by either the 
AFL or the CIO group, depending upon the luiion affiliation of the aggrieved 


(one for industry and two for lal)or, from tlie AFL and the CIO 
respectively ) select a panel from among the members of the Execu- 
tive Board or affiliated members of the Council. It is this panel 
which does the actual mediation. To minimize industrial disputes, 
the Council has now incorporated a contract-reminder service simi- 
lar to that of New York City. Union and management Council 
members are encouraged to notify the l^^xecutive Director of their 
contract expiration dates. 

Other Services. In addition to the usual mediation facilities, 
the l)Oston Council has suggested that its members make use of 
several other services. Where the mediator supplied by the Council 
has little success in settling the dispute, the Council will submit a 
new list to the parties so that they may choose a new conciliator. 
Furthermore, the Council is willing to draw up a list from which 
members may choose a General Chairman to supervise the negotia- 
tion of a new contract. This Chairman acts as a moderator, merely 
drawing up the basic rules of procedure, preparing the agenda, and 
guiding the discussion along logical channels. If negotiations bog 
down and the parties wish the Chairman to act as conciliator, he 
may do so. If the dispute is not settled In- conciliatory methods, 
arbitration is suggested. 

"The Boston Story" explains. "The conciliators and . . . the 
arbitrators supplied by the Industrial Relations Council are business 
and imion ofificials who. individually, possess broad executive expe- 
rience and who are prett}' thoroughly ac(|uainted with labor prob- 
lems within the metropolitan area; men who jealouslx' guard 
reputations for fairness." 

In addition to the settling of disputes, the Council attempts to 
create and develop an atmosphere of understanding and co-opera- 
tion between management and labor through informal meetings 
and discussions. 

Boston-Toledo Comparison. The Industrial Relations Coun- 
cil of Boston differs from Toledo's LMC in two major respects. 
First, it is in no way connected with the local government but was 
originated and sponsored by independent local groups. Second, it is 
primarily bi-partite in contrast with the tri-partite set-up of the 
Toledo Committee. The plans are alike in that both offer arbitra- 
tion as well as mediation services. 


New York City Plan 

The plan for municipal industrial peace found in Xew ^'ork 
differs quite sharply from those previously described. 

On October 1. 1946, Mayor William O'Dwyer of Xew \'ork 
established the City Labor Relations Division, consisting of a di- 
rector, a deputy-director, and a counsel, plus a mediator, a secre- 
tar}- and three stenographers. According to the American Municipal 
-Association report, previously- mentioned: 

While the Toledo and Louisville committees have indicated willingness 
to intervene in virtually all labor disputes that are strictl}- local in charac- 
ter, the Xew York plan contemplates such intervention only in disputes that 
vitally affect the public health, safety and welfare. 

The Division, from a list of contract expiration dates, communi- 
cates with management and labor representatives a full month 
before contracts are to expire and urges that the parties begin 
negotiations immediately. If there is no progress within two weeks, 
the Division notifies the State Mediation Board or the regional 
offices of the U. S. Conciliation Service. 

Point of Intervention. The Division itself does not intervene 
until it becomes obvious that there will be a breakdown of negotia- 
tions and possibly or probabl)' a strike. \\ hen it does finally inter- 
vene, the American Municipal Association reports, "... a highly 
elastic approach is followed. In some cases one of the three leading 
members of the Division of Labor Relations, co-operating with a 
state mediator or a federal conciliator, assists in bringing about a 
settlement. In other disputes, a tri-partite committee of outstanding 
citizens, especially fitted to handle the specific case, is appointed by 
the Mayor, with each such committee being dissolved after a settle- 
ment has been reached." There is no permanent panel. Mediators 
are chosen as the need arises. If there is no hope of reaching agree- 
ment or of submitting the issues to arbitration, the Division may 
then ask a committee to make a report to the Mayor, who may, if 
he deems it advisable, make it public. 

Division's Record. From the time of the l)i\ision's incep- 
tion in October, 1946, to June 30, 1947, a total of 39 disputes had 
been handled. Twenty-three of these disputes were settled without 
resort to strike action while in 16 disputes, strikes were already in 
progress at the time the Division intervened. 

10 I. L. I. R. BULLETIN 

Because many of the disputes handled have involved municipal 
employees, in March, 1947, the Division drew up a comprehensive 
plan of procedures for the settling of grievances and requests for 
changes in wages, hours and working conditions in the City 

Experience in Other Cities 

Plans similar to those in operation in Toledo and Boston have 
been considered or adopted elsewhere in the United States. For 
example, the committee in Louisville, Kentucky, organized in July, 
1946, is modeled almost completely after the Toledo committee. 
However, as was pointed out by the American Municipal Associa- 
tion report, there is an important difference with respect to the 
arbitration policies followed by the two committees. "The Louis- 
ville Committee, . . . undertakes to arbitrate only in the case of 
jurisdictional disputes and those involving governmental [munici- 
pal] agencies." 

Mediation plans have been proposed but not adopted in Chicago 
and in St. Louis. More recently, Detroit (May, 1947) and Seattle 
(June, 1947) gave the Toledo plan extended consideration. Kansas 
City, Missouri; Los Angeles, California; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; 
New Orleans, Louisiana; and Rockford, Illinois are also consider- 
ing plans based on that of Toledo. 

The Labor Relations Board in Newark, New Jersey, modeled 
after the original Toledo Peace Board, was organized in April, 
1937, but was disbanded soon after the establishment of the New 
Jersey State Board of Mediation on April 23, 1941. In addition, 
mediation facilities have existed at various times in Centralia, 
Washington; Sheboygan, Wisconsin, and Adrian, Michigan. 

Problems of Organization and Operation 

Despite the differences in organization patterns, most of these 
agencies face essentially the same problems. 

With regard to form, it is not necessary that the agency follow 
any one plan. Assuming that an agency similar to that in Toledo or 
Boston is under consideration, some thought must be given to the 
desirability of a tri-partite as opposed to a bi-partite agency. 


Personnel of Board. The inclusion of public members may 
serve to give greater prestige to the board and may serve to bring 
greater weight to bear upon the other two parties to reach amicable 
agreement. Further, it may be felt that management and labor alone 
on any panel will do little more than argue the merits of a case in a 
partisan manner, so that the public members will help to provide 
the needed measure of impartiality. In opposition it may be argued 
that sound labor-management relations can best be developed where 
public members are not involved in the mediation proceedings. The 
decision must rest upon the particular needs of the community. 

Another major problem in the realm of personnel is that involv- 
ing the caliber of the men chosen to sit on the panel. It is essential 
that these men be leaders in the community and in their respective 
fields if the agency is to command respect. Yet these men have many 
other responsibilities which keep them from devoting the necessary 
amount of time to this kind of work. The effect of this lack of time 
becomes increasingly apparent as the case load of the agency 
mounts. The result may well be that other groups of men, not as 
influential or well known, are needed to cope with the amount of 
work before the agency. The fact that the community leaders are 
less active in the committee may decrease the effectiveness of the 

Arbitration Policy. Confronting even the best-intentioned 
and the most intelligent members is the question : Shall the agency 
combine mediation with arbitration? The position taken by most 
students of labor relations may best be summarized by the follow- 
ing quotation from Kaltenborn's book, GoTcrnnicnt Adjitstuicnt of 
Labor Disputes: 

Mediators should not serve either as arbitrators or as members of an 
'emergency board.' This is of paramount importance. A mediator must not 
be forced to take a positive stand on the basic issues of industrial disputes 
and thereby run the risk of injuring his effectiveness as a mediator by 
alienating one of the parties. Where mediation and arbitration are com- 
bined within the same agency, the functions should be performed by differ- 
ent personnel. Even more desirable is an arrangement similar to that exist- 
ing in New York [state] where arbitration cases are not handled by the 
mediation board or its staff but the parties are encouraged to select arbi- 
trators from a large list of possible arbitrators chosen by the board. 

The New York State Board of Mediation, at one time combined 
mediation with arbitration facilities. However, it soon found that 

^j; OF lu: tiK 

12 I. L. I. R. BULLETIN 

its effectiveness as a mediation agency was being hampered by its 
activities in the sphere of arbitration. Consequently it changed its 
polic\" to the one mentioned above. An awareness of the difficulties 
arising from this ccjmbination has been evidenced by the Toledo 
Committee in its recently changed attitude toward arbitration. The 
policy suggested by Mr. McCirady for the original Toledo Board 
seems to insure the most effective operation of such a board. 

Geographical Considerations. Even where all the problems 
arising from organization and functioning are successfully settled, 
the effectiveness of any mimicipal mediation plan is severely limited 
by geographical considerations. At best such an agency can deal 
only with those disputes which are local in origin and in extent. Just 
as state mediation agencies must limit themselves to disputes origi- 
nating within the state, so mimicipal agencies are similarly limited. 
This was demonstrated in March, 1947. when the Toledo Commit- 
tee could intervene in only one of three current strikes. This is not 
to argue against municipal plans but rather to point up their 
limited scope. 

Other problems arising to distress any such committee are not 
inherent in mediation plans as such. The agency, for example, ma}" 
use its prestige to push extraneous plans calculated to benefit indi- 
viduals or the public. Differences of opinion on these outside mat- 
ters mav be so severe as to hamper seriously the real work of the 
agencv. Individuals may be tempted to use membership on the com- 
mittee as a stepping stone to other positions. These problems are 
the sort that are faced by any agency in the pul)lic eye and can be 
dealt with onlv bv the determined and sincere efforts of the com- 
mittee members to realize the aims of the agency in the manner 
stipulated by its charter. 

Problems of Jurisdiction 

llie idea of the "Toledo Plan" seems to have a great popular 
appeal for other cities. Articles have appeared in leading magazines 
and newspapers urging the wholesale adoption of this plan on a 
nation-wide scale. It may be well to examine the validity of urging 
such wholesale adoption. 


Kaltenborn states that the desirabiUty of municipal adjustment 
agencies "appears to depend upon (1) fre(|uency of labor disi)iUes 
(2) whether there is an effective state adjustment agency." 

The first point is self-explanatory. Where there is little or no 
industrial conflict, there is obviously no need for such an agency. 
The second point may re(|uire a little elaboration. The key word 
here is "effective." Alan}- states have made some i)rovision for the 
conciliation of labor disptites, but where this provision is not 
acti\ated by agencies of the state there may be a real need for 
municii)al activity. Toledo is in a state having no such agency. 

State-Municipal. Cienerally. where there is an efficient state 
mediation board, a municipal agency runs the risk of decreasing 
over-all efficiency by duplication and overlapping. When disputing 
parties realize that they have at their disposal two organizations 
whose jurisdictions and functions overlap, the)' are tempted to take 
neither seriously and to delay until they see where the best bargain 
can be obtained. In the attempt to avoid this situation, both the 
Newark. New jersey, board and a previous New York City 
board were disbanded when effective state mediation boards were 

Nevertheless, in some instances it may be found necessary and 
desirable to have both state and municipal agencies. For this reason, 
in sittiations where state labor disputes machinery is established, it 
woidd appear desirable to permit enough flexibility so that state and 
local agencies may operate side by side. In New York City the late 
Mayor LaGuardia and the present Mayor O'Dw^yer fotnid a need 
for both state and municipal agencies. The same is true of Boston. 
No hard and fast rule can be laid down, but the largest, most highly 
industrialized cities, would probably do well to examine the i)ossi- 
bilities of establishing mediation facilities in addition to those 
provided by the state. 

Where two agencies operate within the same territor\-, they 
must agree upon some mutually desirable jurisdictional and finic- 
tional limitations. According to a report issued by Wayne Univer- 
sity's Institute of Industrial Relations, a serious jtirisdictional 
problem may develop between the state and mtmicipalities in 
Michigan. Here legislation (Michigan State Act No. 157 of 1*^)47) 

14 I. L. I. R. BULLETIN 

has recently been passed which is designed to channel the settlement 
of disputes through the state Mediation Board. Unless this legisla- 
tion can be adapted to permit greater scope to local agencies, this 
report indicates that these agencies may find their effectiveness 
considerably limited. 

Federal-Municipal. In peace time, jurisdictional conflict be- 
tween municipal agencies and agencies of the federal government 
has been rare. The former Conciliation Service did not intervene in 
disputes which could be settled at a local level. The provisions con- 
cerning mediation in the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 
are sufficiently flexible so that the relationship between local and 
federal agencies will probably not change much. In fact, the new 
federal agency is specifically directed to avoid attempting to medi- 
ate disputes which are not interstate by nature. (See Title II; 
Sections 201-205) 

Factors in Toledo Success 

If a municipal agency of some sort is desired, the next question 
may well relate to the kind of agency. Shall it imitate one of the 
agencies already established? No generalization is possible. Condi- 
tions in a particular locality must be carefully studied and a decision 
arrived at which will take into account the peculiarities of local 
customs and conditions. The decision to adopt any of the plans dis- 
cussed earlier or any part of them, must give consideration to 
factors that made for success in other cities and the similarity or 
dissimilarity of conditions in the locality where such a plan is 

As indicated, the Toledo committee has frequently been cited 
as an example of a successful municipal mediation agency. What 
are some of the factors which have contributed to its apparent 
success ? 

Need. One significant factor was the need for the plan. This 
need arose from a history of long and bitter industrial warfare. 
Prior to the original Board, Toledo had acquired an industrial 
"black eye" which kept new industries from entering the area and 
interfered with the operation of those already there. Thus, the first 


Board was based upon necessity and the second, the Labor-Man- 
agenient-Citizens Committee, upon the fear of a repetition of earHer 

Charter Agreement. Secondly, labor, management, and pub- 
lic members were able to agree upon a basic charter which enumer- 
ated the principles upon which Committee action would be based. 
These earlier meetings were of the utmost importance in laying 
the ground-work for future activity. 

Public Education. The public was subjected to an intensive 
"educational" campaign. From the beginning, Toledo's newspapers 
backed the project editorially. The second time such a plan was con- 
templated, the city had as a firm jumping-off place the successful 
operation of the original Board. Toledo management and labor w^ere 
more easily able to work together and Toledo citizenry could view 
with favor where it might once have viewed with skepticism. 

Leadership. Another factor important to the success of the 
plan was the willingness of the leaders in the community to partici- 
pate actively. Both the first and second Toledo plans were able to 
obtain the services of the top-ranking men in management, labor 
and community life. 

If a plan following the organizational set-up of the Toledo plan 
is desired, it is probable that similar conditions are essential to its 
success. But it certainly cannot be argued that to insure industrial 
peace an agency must model itself after the "Toledo Plan." New 
York and Boston bear witness. Where these agencies have suc- 
ceeded, others, differing from that of Toledo, may likewise succeed. 


In summary, there seems to be no single formula for settling 
industrial conflict through a municipal mediation agency. The most 
that can be said is that for any one city a number of solutions might 
prove to be adequate. The success of any plan w'ill depend upon the 
amount of intelligent study given to the difficulties involved and to 
the demands of the particular situation. It will depend too upon the 
honesty, the sincerity, and the effort put into it by its originators, 
its administrators, and its participants. 

16 I. L. I. R. BULLETIN 


The Boston Story of Labor Mamigeniciit Coopcratio)i ; Industrial Relations 
Council of Metropolitan Boston; Boston; October 1, 1946. 

City Plans for Promotiny Industrial Peace; Roy H. Owsley; American Munici- 
pal Association ; Chicago ; May, 1947. 

Government Adjustment of Labor Disputes ; Howard S. Kaltenborn ; Founda- 
tion Press Inc.; Chicago; 1943; pp. 202-213. 

Implications of Recent Labor Legislation for the Functioning of the Detroit 
L.M.C. Committee and Other Local Mediation Agencies; Institute of Indus- 
trial Relations; Wayne University; Detroit; July, 1947. 

The Toledo Plan; Part I, A Digest; and Part II, An Analysis; Institute of In- 
dustrial Relations ; Wayne University ; Detroit ; March, 1947. 

"Toledo Industrial Peace Board," Toledo City Journal: January 22, 1938; p. 42.